HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 20, 1979 TENTATIVE AGENDA
ADJ.REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MARCH 20, 1979
Mayor Harbeck presiding
11 Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M.
21 Communications :
a] City of Roseau, Flood Plain Management Legislation
b]
31 Liaison reports from Councilmembers :
a] Cncl .Hullander from the Shakopee Fire Department
b] Cncl .Lebens from Recreation Board
c ] Cncl .Reinke from Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
d] Cncl .Ward from Planning Commission and Jt . Seven Man Committee
e ] Cncl .Leroux from Shakopee School Board
f] Mayor Harbeck from Scott County Board of Commissioners
41 RECOGNITION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANYONE PRESENT IN THE AUDIENCE
WHO DESIRES TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA!
51 Old Business :
a] Subsidizing Ambulance Service in Shakopee - tbld 2/20
61 Planning Commission Recommendations :
a] Request for a 55 foot variance from the building height
requirements in an I-1 zone to permit erection of a structure
not to exceed 100 feet in height , Block 37 , Original Shakopee
Applicant : C. K. Allendorf, Rahr Malting Co.
Action: Variance Resolution No. CC-197
b] Request for a variance from the front yard set back require-
ments to permit the erection of a building 20 feet from the
front lot line in a B-3, Community Shopping District
Applicant : Cletus J. Link, 1400 West 3rd Avenue
Action: Variance Res . No . CC-198
Location: E 180' of N150' of Lot 2 , East Shakopee
c ] Preliminary and Final Plat of Hall ' s First Addition, lying
So of Highway 101, East of the Stagecoach Museum Inc . , No of
the Chicago NW RR and W of the Easterly Corporate limits of
the City of Shakopee in Section 12-115-22
Developer: William F. Hall
Action: Approve Preliminary & adopt Res . No . 1376 approv-
ing Final Plat
71 Routine Resolutions and Ordinances :
81 New Business :
a] 8: 00 P.M. - Elderly Housing Project
b] Refuse Collection
c ] Authorize hiring of graduate intern as a planning ass ' t.
d] Accept resignation of Ass ' t. City Engineer
e ] City Engr ' s . status report on public improvement projects
f ] Report on sludge farm
g] Report on tax increment legislation
hi to , CAS
91 Conse t Business :
101 Other Business :
111 Adjourn
Douglas S. Reeder,
City Administrator
TENTATIVE AGENDA
SPECIAL SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MARCH 20, 1979
Mayor Harbeck presiding
11 Roll Call at 7 :00 P.M.
2] Joint Meeting with the Utilities Commission:
a] Watermain loop on 3rd Avenue between Webster and Adams
b] Watermain loop for Clifton Project
c] Official depositories
31 Other Business .
41 Adjourn.
Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
edy o R' 0iF au
BOX 307 * ROSEAU, MINNESOTA 56751 x TELEPHONE [218] 463-1542
MAYOR: Milton A. Arneson
COUNCILMEN: Rodney L. Norquist, Roland W. Fredrickson, Bernie Burggraf, Richard A. Jackson
CLERK-TREASURER: Leland E. Lunos CITY ATTORNEY: Patrick D. Moren
February 19, 1979
The Honorable Walt Harbeck
Mayor of Shakopee
1305 West 6th Street
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Re: Flood Plain Management
Legislation
Dear Mayor Harbeck:
It is my understanding that your city has experienced some
degree of involvement with the National Flood Insurance
Program administered by the U. S . Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) - Federal Insurance Administration
and by the State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources
(DNR) .
I would sincerely appreciate your cooperation in having the
subject matter of this correspondence placed on the agenda
for your next city council meeting and request that this
letter be read at said meeting to your city council.
For a number of years, our city council has attempted to
reach a reasonable understanding with the federal and state
government agencies having jurisdiction over flood plain
management matters, namely HUD and DNR. These attempts have
been less than satisfactory. The end result, has always
been the same; no attention is given to solutions which we
sincerely believed to be reasonable and in the best interests
of the citizens of our community. All local input, including
the actual history of our flooding situation, appear to be
ignored.
It was the unanimous opinion of our city council and of the
vast majority of our constituents who have addressed them-
selves to this issue that our city should oppose involvement
with the National Flood Insurance Program with the attendant
flood plain management criteria required by both federal and
state legislation.
J
We were, however, not so provincial as to be unaware of the
futility of electing the option of nonparticipation in the
federal program. As you are aware, severe sanctions are
imposed on nonparticipants including loss of financing from
such sources as FHA, VA, and loss of grants and other programs
ordinarily available to local units of government. This is ,
of course, a subtle form of extortion apparently precluding
the exercise of any reasonable option by those local govern-
mental units designated by the federal government for inclusion
in the program.
The immediate problem to be addressed by our city council is
the intransigence of the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources. In addition to the dictates of the federal
legislation requiring protection against the regional flood
(also referred to as the 100-year flood) , the DNR has arbi-
trarily decreed an additional requirement of one-foot of
freeboard. This additional burden, which compounds elevation
and flood-proofing expenses , results in severe economic
hardships for our city and its inhabitants.
The Minnesota flood plain management legislation requiring
each participating city or county to enact an ordinance
which must be approved by the Commissioner of Natural Resources ,
is set forth in Minnesota Statutes 104 . 01 - 104 . 08 . Nowhere
in the statutes are there any references to the imposition
of an additional one-foot of elevation or for that matter,
of any protection supplemental to that required by the
federal legislation. The imposition of the additional one-
foot referred to by the DNR as "freeboard" is a classic
example of the exercise of arbitrary administrative fiat,
severely resented by myself and our entire city council.
The DNR rationalizes the imposition of the additional one-
foot by reference to power conferred by the Minnesota
legislature on the Commissioner of Natural Resources to
issue rules and regulations necessary to carry out the
purposes of the state and federal law.
It is interesting to note that most state governments have
not deemed it necessary to supplement the federal legislation
with state statutory language. It is our understanding that
out of the fifty (50) states , only approximately fifteen
(15) states have adopted supplemental flood plain legislation.
We have further been led to believe in our conversations
with HUD officials, that on an overall basis , the State
-2-
P_ C-1
of Minnesota currently imposes the most restrictive and
demanding requirements of any state having adopted additional
or supplemental flood plain management legislation.
In September, 1978 , our city reluctantly passed a variation
of a model flood plain ordinance deleting, however, the one-
foot of freeboard demanded by the Commissioner of Natural
Resources. our council did not believe this deletion to be
a unilateral expression of protest, having had, prior to
adoption of the ordinance, a meeting with HUD and DNR officials ,
including the Commissioner of Natural Resources. At the
conclusion of this meeting, our council was led to believe
by the Commissioner of Natural Resources that our ordinance
would be accepted without the controversial one-foot additional
requirement. The Commissioner stated, however, that he
could not approve any ordinance until it was passed by the
council and submitted to him. Following passage of the
ordinance and submission to the DNR, our city council was
informed by the Commissioner of Natural Resources that our
ordinance was not acceptable and we were given a deadline to
pass an ordinance deemed to be in compliance. Moreover,
this action prompted HUD officials to advise our city council
that unless the city received an approval of our ordinance
by DNR, HUD would declare our city to be in a state of
noncompliance with all the harsh sanctions resultant therefrom.
At that point our city was faced with the option of either
throwing in the towel and buckling under to the bureaucracy, or
electing nonparticipation, which with its obvious built-in
coercion factors, was not likely a viable alternative.
After considerable reflection, our city council pursued a
third option, novel perhaps, but possibly a portent of
things to come. We commenced a legal action against the
Commissioner of Natural Resources in the District Court for
the State of Minnesota requesting the Court to issue a Writ
of Mandamus designed to require the Commissioner of Natural
Resources to accept our ordinance as passed by the city
council. It was our considered opinion that the Roseau City
Council was still the governing body of the city and that as
far as we knew, the Department of Natural Resources had not
yet usurped this function. This legal action is currently
in progress and one hearing has been held in District Court.
We have recently been advised by HUD that if our ordinance
has not been accepted by the Department of Natural Resources
-3-
by April 2, 1979, HUD will hold us to be in noncompliance.
In the event that our action against the Commissioner of
Natural Resources is not resolved by April 2 , 1979, and HUD
does not extend their deadline, our city will commence an
action in the Federal District Court for the State of
Minnesota requesting an injunction or restraining order
preventing HUD from implementing its threatened action.
We believe that the mood of the people of this state reflects
an abhorrence to the heavy handed tactics displayed over
these past many years by the DNR. We propose that the
time has arrived for city and county governments throughout
the state to join forces in cooperating and assisting each
other on problems similar to the one currently being experi-
enced by our city.
Our city council suggests all interested units of local
government consider sending representatives to a joint
meeting to be held at some convenient location at a mutually
agreeable date and time. Would your council be interested
in such a meeting?
If your city identifies with our situation, we would appre-
ciate receiving a letter of support or a resolution from you
requesting deletion by the DNR of the one-foot additional
freeboard required by the Commissioner' s rules and regulations.
You may also wish to consider in any resolution a recommendation
that the Minnesota legislature review the entire flood plain
management legislation and the powers conferred upon the
Department of Natural Resources in this and other matters.
I would be pleased to answer any inquiries you may have
regarding the subject of this correspondence.
Thank you for bringing this matter to the attention of your
city council.
Sincerely yours,
-sue
;ton A. Arneson
Mayor of the City of Roseau
MAA: jl
-4-
o� LIONS CLUB
Post Office Box I I I
Shakopee, Minnesota
March 21 1979
Common Council
City of Shakopee
Shakopee, MN 55379
Gentlemen:
The members of the Shakopee Lions Club unanamously support an action by
the Common Council of the City of Shakopee to subsidize the St. Francis
ambulance program. This program is vital to the citizens of Shakopee,
as well as those who reside in the surrounding area. A discontinuance
of this service would be a tragic loss to the community. We therefore
urge you to approve the proposed ambulance subsidy contract with St.
Francis Hospital.
Yours very truly,
L. chmld
Secretary
z
LAR 5 1979
QTY OP SHAKOKE
K
PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
(Excerpt)
Adj . Reg. Session SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA August 24, 1978
Koehnen/Colligan moved to open Public Hearing on Hall ' s 1st Addition --
Preliminary and Final Plat . Motion carried.
City Admin. explained the proposal plat to the Commission.
A variance for a moritorium is needed before the Plan can be approved .
Don Woodward was present representing the proposal and to answer questions
from the Commission.
Marie Klavestad was present in the audience concerned with the type of
equipment which would be used and where the equipment would be run.
Doug , also representing the proposal stated all equipment
would come directly off Highway 101 .
' owner of the Stagecoach was present in the
audience and questioned the type of business this would be .
This is a sales type of building. No manufacturing is involved.
Discussion was held on the driveway. It appeared to Chairman Schmitt
that there was a common driveway to both parcels . The plat reads
"existing driveway for common use" .
City Admin. explained that the builders have no desire to build a
road at that point .
Chairman Schmitt asked for questions from the Commission.
Discussion followed on the driveway .
This is unsewered property.
This property is currently zoned Highway Commercial .
Questions on the drainage proposal were raised. Discussion held.
Chairman Schmitt asked for comments from the audience . There were none .
Colligan/Rockne moved to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried.
Chairman Schmitt asked for comments or recommendations from Staff .
Staff recommendations were:
1 . ) The name be changed to Hall ' s 1st Addn. , deleting the first two
initials .
C,
Proceedings of the
Planning Commission (excerpt) -2- August 24, 1978
2 . ) No Developers Agreement is needed .
3 . ) A favorable Title Opinion has to be obtained .
Discussion was held on the drainage system and the driveway.
Perusich/Colligan moved that the Planning Commission recommends approval
of PC-184 to waive the moritorium on platting to allow approval of
Hall ' s 1st Addn. Motion carried .
Colligan/Rockne moved to approve the platting of Hall ' s 1st Addn. with
the recommendations given from Staff . Motion carried .
NOTE: CITY COUNCIL TABLED VARIANCE, PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL
PLAT BECAUSE OF MORi .TORIUM. MOR.iTORIUM NO LONGER IN
EXISTANCE AND COUNCIL MAY NOW CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY AND
FINAL PLAT -- NO VARIANCE REQUIRED. 9/5/78.
J
ISBERG, RIESENBERG, CHELSETH AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
2116 Second Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404 612-871-5628
Report to the Shakopee City Council and Staff:
AN OVERVIEW OF THE ELDERLY HOUSING PROJECT SITE SELECTION PROCESS
March 13,1979
I, Introduction
February 12 of this year, the city was notified that the Minnesota
Housing Finance Agency(MHFA) had selected Shakopee for the construction
of a 60 unit elderly public assisted project at Levee Drive and Atwood.
While the city is actively involved in the project by providing the site,
MHFA contributes permanent financing and HUD commits a full 30 year,monthly
60 unit, section 8 tenant subsidy (the government helps pay for
rent to make up the difference between fair market values and 25% of the
person' s monthly income).
Realizing Shakopee has worked hard for years to get such a project and
that elderly housing is a key community concern, it appears that the
best development site is in question. More specifically, there is
concern that the site selected by MHFA for development is not the best
location in Shakopee to place an elderly housing project. The purpose
of this brief report is to review the site selection process by:
1) providing information on site selection criteria either pointing
out better sites or supporting the one selected, and 2) attempting to
explain the MHFA/HUD housing programs so the city may appropriately
deal with these agencies.
II .
Identifying an Elderly Housing Site Selection Criteria Process
The following criteria dictate the components which go into selecting a
good site. These criteria are graphically displayed on the accompanying
maps.
1) Zonin - since the present ordinance permits multi-family dwelling
construction (highrises) in the CBD, the CBD zoning district is an
obvious first component of a good site.
2) Land Needs - preliminary information indicates that a 60 unit,
six - seven story high structure with parking lot and green area
consumes around a one-half block area parcel of land. Shared overflow
parking with nearby parking area may also be beneficial . Therefore,
a one-half block parcel of vacant land is necessary for the project.
Also considered in the selection process will be one-half block
sites sparsely occupied with vacant, dilapidated structures capable
of HRA acquisition and land write-down. The application of a small
tax increment project is feasible on an elderly housing project,
even though 60% of the tax base is abated.
3) Close to Services - it makes good sense to position elderly housing
within walking distance of the basic needs: such as shopping
buil(food
and drugs), medical offices, religious institutions, public
(city hall , library, post office) and even public transit.
-1-
4) Highrise View - Because of any ur feeldinterestingdvistapsrsuchmasit
creates for the elderly,
man
wn activity an important site selection
scenic open space or downto
criteria. In Shakopee's case, the river does pose an open space
view while almost any place in the Central Business District if
elevated a few floors offers observation of downtown activity.
5) Undesirable Site Characteristics - Opposite of good site selection
characteristics, a few influences pose onsetos the
itu functioning
and use of a good elderly housing . In
two potential undesirables Most important, hazard
M traffic
esthetic characteristics. M p
load congestion causes noise and critical
problems. Secondly, HUD
which prohibit elderly site selection within 300 feet of a
railroad.
III . Resulting Sites
With these major site selection advances theafollowi simple
downtown
site search was conducted which
each site' s strength and weaknesses (see chart) .
1) Levee & Atwood
good - in Central Business District
- predominantly vacant
- close to services
- good riverfront view
bad - safety problem with crossing First Avenue
2) Fuller & Second
good - in Central Business District
- vacant
- close to services
bad - within HUD's 300 foot railroad noise area
3) Holmes & Third
good - in Central Business District
- close to services
- no major site limiting characteristics
bad - not quite a one-half block parcel
- needs extensive acquisition/clearance/land write-down and
possibly relocation assista nce
-2-
4) Sommerville and Fourth
good - no limiting site characteristics clearance
- partially vacant, one house may distance to services
- still within reasonable walking
bad - out of Central Business District prohibitive
- acquisition/relocation costs may be p
5) Lewis and Levee
good - in Central Business District
- predominantly vacant
close to services
- good riverfront view
bad - safety problems crossing First Avenue, but light at
Lewis is in.
IV. Miscellaneous Influences on an Elderly Project
The MHFA project selection process and mortgage commitment will , more
than any one factor, influence the construction of an elderly develop-
ment.
Four related concerns: ly
ed
1) Elderly housing projects are extreme
lyTo°makeltheepicture even tmore
funds with greater need than supply.
demanding, HUD and MHFA within the last year have narrowed new
housing developments for 19 Senext1yearrrHUDrfundingfis�expecteds
elderly subsidy. Additionally, project selected
to be diminished by budget cuts and inflation. The
in Shakopee is the result of a residual allotment from HUD to MHFA
outside its 1978 yearly allocation. MHFA
2) Due to the Shakopee selection coming as a residual allotment,
mortgage underwriting is proposedetonomicdfeasiibility i0s tightened
year loan terms. This means
up from typical projects. cess
3 The MHFA site/developer selection FA board lselects ronly usitesdthat
may not be open to change. The MHFA and only after staff review
have been proposed by a developers)
and investigation. The situation in Chaska last year points this
out.
4 Some form of city land write-down to the developer may have to take
place on the p ro j ect for economic feasibility, especially due to the 30 year mortgage situation, and in p articular with the placement of
new traffic control signals or construction of senior's meeting
facility.
-3-
r cn x -n r r
M o o c M o
< 3 < C-)
M 3 3 m D
S N 0--4
Qo < eo O
M M f
N Qo 'Y O O
i1 0-
O
C
Z
c+
x x x x CBD Location
X X X Available For
Acquisition (Vacant)
X X X x Nearby Services
River
Good Vistas
'< X Downtown
X Railroad Noise Problem
Unsafe Pedestrian
Crossing
s
V. Conclusions/Recommendations
No one site in Shakopee can satisfy all the criteria discussed. Therefore,
the selection of "the best" site comes down to a trade-off of site
characteristics. Obviously some people have greater personal preference
for one site than another.
My recommendations:
1) Two of the five sites, Holmes & Third and Sommerville & Fourth,
should be dropped from consideration due to extensive cost of site
clearance and need for rezoning.
2) Discussions with senior citizens have taken place and should continue
by explaining the MHFA process and information on site selection.
3) Try to accept the Levee and Atwood site, if not, the city jeopardizes
losing the project. Attempts to provide a controlled intersection
at Atwood should be discussed with the developer.
4) Only if very strong opposition against the Levee and Atwood site
arises should the city oppose its development, and then preferably
with MHFA staff.
-5-
utiji}{•v, ...........
: -}:'.?v..::i:i?�iri:;;: vr
:..$-.{;+• ,,JJ..,} Y:y,:}:•• \•yy;, ;.+} }%yng r.\C�: ...y4i{!<i•;i}}::<:yr:
k:ti f>.a ;�iti":F:n t�Q .'�3 tt`4{'"^•h,,,�� �ii'4> il';pc:'•is ::3•:::+.$:{,r•r::.
:.,�;>:,5,.,v' •k.n. •. J,.f�-�� / •^.a+o:f}:>.:.?C? ':.;y:•;j,�:..Y.fi,y'w}yti. .)st.`,:;::${,r,..;;:•:S.f{,:..:i;,.,
'V •"'..?. .}�.%,''%;.;,y{ YY> :: rRrC,.fi} 3;�:7 ...�:•r.`};S: ^=4:•r.: ,.,fi}.}}:.�{.i::••h
vx KS'6 :rv:- . •:J...N.::_�}:':: kf. •.?�.•.•.•Y ':•T: rnY}..}::\•i•wr:
T.:r..n. }.:..�.. �.0 tivo } lj:k:j}y?:•::::�:::i%'i:;ii i::: ..}i3
�v} Tt}#y....:......H:::n:?}.�•,Yi}.v.,::.::?i::.v:::;•-..., ..•. .KSv'!. vr. ...M1yy .....:..,4.'f^,Y'.
r.?. '� ..ti?- ;: warMY�WM!I�MWYM�Yw .:.... .... ...MrnW"' <;�:.:.':;:`}:k;5k'Y•:;.r;.
+:•h}'.:=F• ..'::.:\ij: ............. :. i h ::' "�'kYt%JY+<^tiArjvi},'fi,.:}
...............
:�!%:% fir.'{;q?:}' r.rT•w �"�-+
• Y. fiyv} +:f:4•, :�?S?r fi::ti}:;}:i";i?':i::�:,vii:
Ir
Services
f :.n .. x:. F}�iiv:ii!;:::.i:h;::•}v?• ..:::::.: ... 4 J } ....... %},.:{4':::
:.,. .. Yfv.:... .v.T? ... .r:}.}::•; :.gin.. .......::•:••, n xr4:':{r•}i':.:
... .. ..... .. ..w:n.:•x.. rx.}:.:?:F;::•.?•}}i:.{;n!Y.•, } T^.:"{_''Jf... ::n•,N:•.<"•:h ,v,•:•/.•±
'v{.-. .. r v ,%,sa;'� S'A..!. '.r� /n{• ..} :K:....•}}:%lv:..S....:v n}.:..
Yip{{ ::::n}:�•.::::.::::•::::::::.
• •v. {:•Kr{-.. ..•.vh.. ....- .::Y}:•i:.}:::i'}::}.ii'.:�:.i::i::::..
..r�
CHURCH
C
n\a. K0.K .Y......v,Y.!i{{}:•YhvYx{.}:K:::•iii
n•:;.: , :h:• :•...::.... ::•.,... ...................... vx...:J r.Yn•vrY::::r: :^i''r' .. .............T.......:'
;S:a^\.S•:::::.fi{�.v:rr}•. t'i{.... r:,:,•••:::?..-.\ i••>}::::::::,::...:.:..!.;::... x:. ...:)•.........? :::r.n• {t....{........... :}:.;:::s:
+�
Y'v.AiF` =',a. '•Z:}:}t%<$i?::v.{•}:hi'Y{{ F•rS:•YY�+%"
Jn� �•,n+r v
.,-Y;�F':a:.. T.. ,�"{.}:•:: ••{}"tir.�:.. n.� :. v).'r ...Ir.., ., v:.4:•}
,.;;SY.f:.x,,.�V..rr:;...,?.. :::::::: ?:;.r;�::.:::•f.:+..+:..::T...,.{.....................t.;f{;aFw-:.xvr.:.,:..r:}:::.r {),.5:::;::::}:!{.;.;...;;}.:x{•:.f:::...
GROCERY
- v.:{'�.::.;:..rfY::::.::::.,•.:::. . ... .:. ...w..:.r::{.Y::::::'.:. .:.:.:::::::::::.:?.}:.; ?.:.. a;..:h..x.:'.' :};k::i::.'::i>:::
.M
h}ti. .i}iyf y .n. t ••,
v1:\.. ... .. }.�:^Y.={C:....r:::4Y;•:f}: :i}i: - vf.. .:S� :•r:v '}+:ii•:'ti i:::i::;:
. 'fif :N•n. :
{�:; rr.K.}:4;}rnYYY}Y}:!4iYYi::. }•n• .�:h}.
......... ... ,.... :.Kvv 1....�.��{�...:;•w,v •'•„ n.: ..n...............:.... .x� ..7, \..{•:f:{:f {.::::::::-• ;i:::t4i}i:::l:iiili
nC,;•,,.• nw: :..yf}3,{.r{n,}?;:i'+:f::::,v{,.} rF•i:rw:....:::::f.nF.,{\•}F: ...f�,,:ii:%v.?�7.'t .:•.,:Y.:}
'•= F•' L LIBRARY
\v
J 9�• :.
'x
Y'
R
M
k
Y$
'1
.•1F_nn
ICAL
AWTM S•
•4.,
.Y.:.
P POST OFFICE/CITY LL
•K:i �i{C�..
..Ff.
;T{
{.t�fx{....
Ji}•Y
{:{i:iii'ri:�i:'•
- :......... 'iii:
-:.J.:?::::. ...:.... .:.�n•: :::n::::::.. .....::::::::..}Y}}.{•: .�:..:. � !S%i•?}ij:}::� � Y�' in�M�,v:i::i
•. ih +�vn•:v::::.r:?::!::.{. rn•: X:Fh=:.......... ...:}}}i)}iY:: {"......,.... v. ::::'
..:..;F?�.nl..: :v:::.v::: :J .... ..,:•:::v:/.•.{:!::nx:n..v::::::::..........: ..n•:....:..v:T.:}w. •::.
.. ,...,... Land Use
'df�'f f- J� f �• •.
rx .
. ;
PARKING
n
. N
..R:..r..r: VACANT
/.S
r... n:..^CH4:r.J. .:.:..::.:::..�fYri}. .... :::.%....: r. •Hn J•...: .::}
v... r. n.. :�5.. ...F.... ... •::nj�r�. •} .vn:nw.v{.y::,}:{'i•:N}:•:'•:i::'r::
.v
.. -.... ..::it..:...:'.>•r.>y}-..::•::::.•::...............::.::.,•.:..,::::::.,•:::}::::>.............::::::..
:Y
..y
Y.
,ft.
J..
,,�{{ f}:%• 4:�:•:. •' ,::. W:i.Hi{. nv::.�: :::::}:i:•i:;ii:}::^ii:::iiii:�:ii::':i�
.Y•: r,r�.. .,.p .�..r :xff..': :v:F,.-:v:.....:ii:•'r:ti?.v;
:,. {v.{...' �....... {� •yfr..na{rr. .. F.:,i;..:::,-::.r:•• .... •}..�s• ,•k•}}}i:;{•:;:;.>::::Y::}}:.:
::.•r•.r}:�..:.::`�'.{'..{•�..:.�..:..:.}.:.}..::.:•.::.:•;.::•✓::};:}..:}:$.:.a.:;.:..:.:t.(.{..',q:Y")n}'..}$...:.fi.,�..%..'.•..v.':`S:.,Jk•.r..i.,:�,.4..�....�•..{>::.:•/...,'..Y:.fn•.:-,:.G....f.n.,::+..•.•t..•.c..�.•.•}.'l?.{.�.}..:.}}�.::•H.�'f:...{:.r,•:f....n{.•r:v.,.:..d::•.{.::...::}..:::.a.::...:}�..::...::5.:.::.•.::}..:::.{.::...:i>..:}:...:::..<n}...->.�..::.-.::}..:}...x:..r...Y••r�C{v....,.:..,..T.•.::.::...::..,•.:n:•:..........:....n...•..:.-.........w:::::::::::ri.}.>.:.::.:..Y}<:y;:.v::t
•:.:^,,.:•:.•}:r.:.::.::.:::::.:n•.}•.::•.i:.::•.::c.:.>:.:::::.:>::.•.i:.::.:+..>:.::..>:.;.:}.::•.:i
Y2: v.}.:.:'i::i.:i.:r.::.::.::.::.:i.:i.::.:.i•.::..:::.::.?::•.?:.?:
..
1-5 PROPOSED SITES
...:: :::ni:..:-...i ,a,n.......\
�p� . a-}r f},i};. };'4'r'}::in.."vv,+:},. u:ith.•}Y}::•>i{�r.- {':•}+'i:
^.}. •K^:•'•:•• ..1. :%ti}:iiiii:ii:•}??i:�i:>:jiii•r' �.r ..tt.
.. .Jf:.,.f •.::.:nv: :n.n............t n• .•i: }Ty n•.y} .;.v
r.F ..F. .:.r.Q.r Y''{4 hr'..v 4•:,:'i'\•ii:%:
�{'.r�x:Y..ar....." ,r n:,• .={}r:}r.i...xl...{.••::.r::n•.:}v.::?.::.}:..:}:..:::}.{:{.:::.:::..::..::.J:w::.:h::•nY::Yr?:i.tii:••r•;i.y:'.-}>.::;.n.•}i.v}i.}s.::.:'.:..:•}>.h•}h:}.:::.Y:::,::n.!�:;•:!:.}:.:i:.:.:.::::}:..h:::...:{..M..::.::.:•:..W{.3:.%r.'.r..:••x.:::.:w:.v:::::::::.::..::..:n..:.^.•.::::w:!..•. .•-.. ...::.......�...:.,,..i,.v.•F}'�x.•x..:::.:ti:i:ti{Yn i{;}.:`Y',}T.:.r:.:::�n,i..:.:A•:.:v:nH:..-}:::.•
i}{Y+>.:•i:•�'':
//, 3n0 RAILROAD NOISE Ci
Kh:C•. ...{ri
.. f .fJ ....r..................:.. .... ...n.m .. v.:•}r .:. v v: }::::::•:•}}}}}}:•-:•:::..:::::::.:.vn}}}}}':::::::::::n}xv.:?:�'r}:?::::::::::.':i:::::'.`:
.:}.{ti. r : .� .. .� ..fw{ti{:{•Y:::�.m...{::<::;>;:.}}}:::.::f}i}::;:»::::i>
AREA
IMPACT
..!�':,... ...•n:--:•:.r:}:..r::........... :>:Siiiii i5•n}•'::!'is i:;::
.,yv
,nf. :Yrfr^:.)#•::{: :.:xw.• ;T.h.:,. >}:'t}' :.yf). .Y.,y,... %c<::::".•::ii::'::>:, <:'
{:;?:rr .h : ..J �::n'i':y::jfi,'l:ri:'ri'it::4Kf:is�r// ..,;k n.{{}v.',.ri'•}• i},Y•y �':4i2.t::'::r{f•,•,y; fr^v)tG:.:}! f:•)viL:Y:ti•.7;:r.
,r F!-}:,.r is{:{.S.;+{j r�,{•',.;�fr/••u.::ly:: :{}}r„M,v,Y:: {� .•i\. ?. Y}�.•:'8:.i:ti:}} ir.v:.:}:...
�;..: .:)e: +hfJE•.'FkY'.;ix{..•'=.FfJ::q.r ...hi9'.�� .�•••'��.•.r•r•,J'.�.,.: ..:. 'i.3.+`•v):. .• .{}�y}„:ki•:' .:.:•k}i}:; C'•.-: -F.:r':
•?::' •�:.. :r}� :.�Yn':}. K :.. ...v r•..::i3r.:{nyra•;: .!}..t...{{:i:?o{ j� :•r.JS::9;3 Y.9•:..
CBD LIMITS
Shakopee Elderly Housing Project
k
ISBERG, RIESENBERG, CHELSETH AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
2116 Second Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404 612-871-5628
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL AND STAFF
FROM: CHUCK RIESENBERG
RE: ADDITION TO ELDERLY HOUSING SITE SELECTION REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 1979
Two additional bits of information are worth passing on which deal with
Shakopee' s elderly housing project on mitigating adverse site character-
istics at the Levee & Atwood and Fuller & Second locations.
1 . Fuller & Second
The Railroad noise impact at this site, although not complying with
MHFA/HUD standards, may be mitigated in a number of ways. First, the
structure itself could be positioned on the southern half of the
parcel furthest from the track with parking and landscape buffering
on the northern part, plus using building design techniques of acoustics.
2. Levee & Atwood
The placement of a pedestrian crossing point at Atwood would be
imperative with the closest existing crossing at Holmes, which is a
very difficult crossing due to traffic islands and frequent truck and
car turning motions.
»n.�.
■ ■� ��jam`■� ■ TNFV AL6iv-
Shakopee Elderiv Housina Proiect
!Y �
ISBERG, RIESENBERG, CHELSETH AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
t 2116 Second Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404 612-871-5628
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL AND STAFF
FROM: CHUCK RIESENBERG
RE: ADDITION TO ELDERLY HOUSING SITE SELECTION REPO°T
DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 1979
Two additional bits of information are worth passing on which deal with
Shakopee's elderly housing project on mitigating adverse site character-
istics at the Levee & Atwood and Fuller & Second locations.
1 . Fuller & Second
The Railroad noise impact at this site, although not complying with
MHFA/HUD standards, may be mitigated in a number of ways. First, the
structure itself could be positioned on the southern half of the
parcel furthest from the track with parking and landscape buffering
on the northern part, plus using building design techniques of acoustics.
2. Levee & Atwood
The placement of a pedestrian crossing point at Atwood would be
imperative with the closest existing crossing at Holmes, which is a
very difficult crossing due to traffic islands and frequent truck and
car turning motions.
ti
■
1.... +•v....•.\•.
+.v....•,:.\ ..� ...v)i^.,<;:+}YYY}-„nor}>Y...•.}>:.::.}:.:•:::............ icy; ,...... }}��,, ;;•.
....,�:•.::::::::}:::}iii;•}iiYY:C: i.4 :.{n.;. ..+?i:'i::n+
+ '.:v.. ...•..•n.:.?K6.��YVti!P,::+ :::. r. ., vY::Y:::.h•}i::::::q}.v:...:•::: ..:. ...
,.. ...v{,�:•....�...... ... ii::iY:`vY}Yi;:;:.;•:::...•.;}.n.:::::::::Yi;{4Y::•:}Yi}i::. w::::. AVU,
rrry ::::::::::.>:., '::>:::.Y::QYY:•'F,.i::ii:i<}r••::•::•::i::::. ...,,.,. .t+v::.v::..
� � ® ■ ® 7�t1I�D aa�1u�
■ ■
MA
OLL
Shakopee Elderly Housing Project
nug
Mkip
March 14, 1979
The Honorable Robert J. Schmitz
State Senator
328 State Capitol
St. Paul , Minnesota 55155
RE: SHAKOPEE ELDERLY HOUSING
Levee Drive
Shakopee, Minnesota
MHFA 1#78-026
Dear Senator Schmitz:
The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) has received the petition regarding the
selection of the above-named housing development, and MHFA staff is reviewing the
concern expressed over the amount of traffic in the central business district and
its affect on the tenants of the proposed development in Shakopee.
An explanation of why this development was chosen may help you understand the
circumstances which gave rise to your constituents' concerns. In January 1978,
until the deadline of February 28, 1973, MHFA advertised for proposals for the
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development' s (HUD) 1978 Fiscal Year funding
of the Section 8 housing program. Two proposals for housing for the elderly
in Shakopee were submitted: one for a site located at 3rd Avenue and Fuller Street
and the other to be located near Levee Drive and Fuller Street. During the
selection process, the staff found both Shakopee sites to be well located in
terms of proximity to services, and both proposals had community support in the
form of letters and newspaper articles.
As you may know, the 3rd Avenue site is adjacent to railroad tracks which are fre-
quently used during both daytime and evening hours. It is a policy of both MHFA
and HUD to avoid constructing residential units within 300 feet of railroad tracks
because noise and other environmental factors associated with such locations make
them unsuitable for residential purposes. During the review of the sites, HHFA
staff contacted the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the sponsors
of both sites to make them aware of our concerns regarding the railroad tracks.
The final decision of MHFA, after careful consideration, was that the 3rd Avenue
site was unacceptable for the use proposed. The Levee Drive site presented no
environmental concerns and it offered both active and passive view6 for the resident
one toward the bridge and downtown and one across the Minnesota River and park.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Jenator Kober-c J . Z)c,pm1C`
The review process also involved of the traffic
intersection situation
atHolries
Highway 169 and it revealed that there
Street located tUro blocks from the site which allows safe crossing to the beginning
of the concentration of commercial services.
Although the Levee Drive eras judged to be suitable, it ,was not selected for
processing at that time because of funding
In late 1978, a limited amount of Section $ ecaupeumostfofdthee1979 allocation
HUD from the 1978 Fiscal Year allocation. B
to use
is limited to use for family developments, the r�,The Levee DriveosiaecinsShakopee
the 1978 recaptured funds for elderly housing.
was one of the proposals selected by MHFA and confirmed by HUD with the reservation
of subsidy funds for 60 units of housing for the elderly.
Since that time, the sponsor, in response of Transportation
otatopinvestigateresidents
and INFA, had discussions with the Department
methods of improving pedestrian access to the commercial services.
Be assured that it is the objective of the Agency to provide the best possible
housing for the low and moderate income residents of Minnsota, and
from staff
will support the sponsor' s efforts to improve pedestrian th
Levee Drive site.
If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to contact the Housing
Development Officer assigned to this development, Dianne Orbison, at 296-3029.
Sincerely,
James J. Solem
Executive Director
/rk
cc: John Bergstad
Dianne Orbison
Leag� r ic�17 x� `t:i:� i _;;���lk; ��: ' �.� tri h and F�1Llccitlorl 1r1 the St.
ama.84 S.6th Mne55i402(612)338-0791•
I rE
F L 8 2 6 1979 February 21 , 1979
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
TO THE MAY AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL:
The collection of garbage and refuse is one public service in which the munici-
palities of the Twin Cities area have the opportunity now to begin to respond to
the public's urgent pressure for a more cost-effective government.
The Citizens League has recently done an updating -- from its original 1975
study -- about the problems and opportunities for local government, in the solid
waste system. This has produced a clear and simple list of "dos" and "don'ts".
I think you will find it helpful . . . in the look we hope you will take at the
way the system is working -- and the way it might be improved -- in your munici-
pality.
We say again what we said in 1975: That the Twin Cities metropolitan area now
has, by and large, an effective and low-cost system for collecting garbage and
refuse. (See the memo attached.)
But it should be, and can be, made more efficient, with some changes that could
be introduced fairly easily. And -- to our surprise, and concern -- we found a
need for municipalities to guard against the danger of losing the positive ele-
ments of the system that exist at present.
Let me take the latter part of the problem first.
In any chars es in the waste collection system the most important thin by far
is to avoid an more o t e c t i e non-c% et t ve attars ements introduced
severe ears ago, or exam e n t e cit of M nnea o s. s is an especi-
a y mportan cons era ion, currently, n t. au w ere the concept of a
d as one element of an ordinance
citywide master contract is frequently propose
providing for and requiring the mandatory pickup of garbage and refuse in the
city. The assumption seems to be that these two features of a refuse collection
system are necessarily tied together. They are not; and they must not be.
Municipalities -- as policy decisions and operating experience in a number of
well-managed the p
imortantddesirable$elements have, and do
effectivevandsimultaneously,
all three of the important
refuse collection system.
These are:
1 . The mandatory collection of refuse and garbage combined:
Imogene Trsrchel Peter A.Heegaerd Archibald Spencer Staff
Officers Directors Dean Lund W James L.Holland,Jr. Prank Welters Executive Director
Raymond D.Black Harty Norton Hobert W.Wallace Tad%oldsne
President Martha Norton William O.Whitt VarM C.Johnson 'John W.Windhor"
WaVne G.Popham W.Andrew Boss Robert E.Owens past Presidents Stuart W.Lack,Sr. .Decanted Associate Director
Vice Presidents Fred C.Cady Roper Palmer Great E.Lockhart Paul A.Gdle
Allan R.Boyce Pat Davis$ Madore Perlman Charles S.Bellows John W.Monty MembershiP Orfector
Eleanor Colborn Joseph L Easley Daniel K.Paterson Francis M.BoddV Arthur Naltalin Calvin W.Clark
A.Kent Shamblin Leo Foley James R.Pratt Charles H.Clay Norman L.Newhall,Jr. Research Associates
Fran0lf M.Soddy Joan Forester Solvaig Premeck Eleanor Colborn Wayne H.Olson !twi',am Veto,
John Cairns Scotty Gillette Rosemary Rockenbaeh Rollin H.Crawford '1_406 C.Park Barry Richards
Secre!vey David Graven Mary Rollwagen Waite D.OurfN Malcolm G.PfundV Brad Richerds
Nov—�.0 von Paul�r 6tn goon 1.Seek* J,°.°inn ,e^..+t a,-W. ,
-2-
2. The efficiencies of a single truck moving down a particular street, or alley.
3. Open bidding for the work, with vendors competing on both price and service
differentials.
Outside the central cities, the principal opportunity for additional economies
in refuse col ection lies in reducing the number of miles driven by the refuse
trucks. The basic effort, here, should be to arrange for a single operator to
cover an entire area. If the service areas are kept small , and the contracts
are let for no longer than the five-year period needed to recover an operator's
original investment in his trucks, the overriding objective of price competition
can be preserved in the process. Again: The experience in several suburbs
demonstrates that this can in fact be done.
Again, St. Paul presents a special case, requiring particularly careful handling
by that city' s elected officials .
In order for St. Paul to avoid the risk of some significant increase in the price
of refuse collection to homeowners, the city government should approach its
decision by building off of the existing system -- in which homeowners buy refuse
collection services, based on price and service, from a large and diverse group
of refuse haulers. Specifically:
1 . The city should first encourage, and make it possible for, homeowners to get
together to buy this service jointly, within the city's planning districts
and through the district planning councils. This would achieve the one-
truck-per-alley objective, while retaining the competitive bid system.
2. A second choice would be for the city to run an open bidding system, on
behalf of the residents of the various individual planning districts. The
city would act as the agent; bidding would be P individual district. The
city would become exclusively a buyer: St. Paul government would eliminate
the small refuse collection operation now run by the Public Works Department,
which is high-priced and used generally only by persons (in most cases, the
elderly) who do not pay their own bills but have the city pay the charges for
them. Employees would be transferred to other city work.
In the memo attached to this, you will be interested, I think, to look at the
numbers that reflect the differences in homeowner cost which presently exist in
the Twin Cities area, from municipality to municipality, and from one kind of
refuse collection arrangement to another.
It is important to be wary of the normal practice of quoting the cost for refuse
collection service in dollars per homeowner per month. This obviously produces
a modest figure. We are all aware, however, of how rapidly the dollars mount up
when that figure is multiplied first by the 12 months of the year . . . and then
by the 450,000 houses in the Twin Cities area . . . and then multiplied again,
say, by 10 or 20 years. Very few citizens of the Twin Cities area would not be
delighted to have 50t per house, on that basis.
-3-
In closing, let me come back to what I said at the beginning about what is at
stake for local government in its response to the public's pressures for expendi-
ture reduction.
The Citizens League in 1978 looked at this larger question -- raised especially,
of course, by Proposition 13. It was the view of that study committee, endorsed
by the Citizens League board of directors, that sweeping restrictions on local
government' s spending and revenue-raising would not be appropriate in Minnesota.
But this conclusion assumes, clearly, that discrete and effective action would
be taken by local officials and administrators on their own initiative, to deal
with the problems of cost control in the service delivery system. It was an
assumption, in other words, that local officials would use the scalpel , if the
public or the state would refrain from swinging the meat axe.
The Citizens League has expressed its view that local officials will respond to
that challenge.
The service of garbage and refuse collection is one of the most desirable, and
one of the most feasible places to begin . . . particularly because it is so
much more an opportunity than a problem.
We hope you will give the following statement prepared by our Community Informa-
tion Committee your early attention. We stand ready to help in any way we can.
Wayne G. Popham
President
Citizens League
84 South Sixth Street February 21, 1979
Minneapolis,MN 55402
338-0791
REFUSE COLLECTION: GETTING BETTER SERVICE FOR LOWER COST
Refuse collection is one of the basic services neces- Cost disparity by competition and service. As one
sary for the functioning of modern society. The might guess, the cost of refuse collection vanes in
service provided is important to individual house- part by the amount of service provided. For exam-
holds and to the entire community. Regular,depend- ple, some haulers charge their customers up to
able service is so important that few individuals and $2.00 per month extra if they must carry the refuse
local government officials in this region appear to pay from a location within the yard, rather thane eking
much attention to what it costs, as long as the job it up at the curb or in the alley. However, h
gets done. appears to be more a factor of the organization of
the collection service than the service provided.
Neglect is costly. Currently, the cost per household
for refuse collection in the region varies threefold,or Take municipal collection in St. Paul, and Robbins.
as much as $5.00 per month, with much of the vari- dale's contracted service, again as examples. In St.
ation in price being unrelated to the service pro- Paul,city crews provide curb and alley pickup service,
vided. Additionally, serious problems with uncol-
while in Robbinsdale much of the normal household
lected garbage have been reported in some neighbor- waste is carried out from within the residents'yards.
hoods, and many streets and alleys are subjected to If the carry-out service is in fact worth substantially
extra wear and tear when several different refuse cost of$ 2. Surb ormon is ice ,Then particularly advantageous
collection trucks each serve only part of the house- vis-a-vis the St. Paul charge of $6.04 per month.
holds in a given neighborhood.
Organization is key cost factor..In the 1975 Citizens Minneapolis, St. Louis Park,and Edina(Morningside)
League report, Taking the Waste out of Minnesota's provide extra services. In the cities of Minneapolis
and St. Louis Park,the haulers regularly pick up large
Refuse,the League found that refuse collection costs bulky
and yard wastes as part of their weekly
vary widely, depending on how refuse collection is Y
organized within a community. The League found collection service. This contrasts with the general
that contracting with private haulers for service to practice of assessing an extracharge for large items.In
a community tended to get the best rates. A phone Minneapolis the total service expense was about
survey done in January, 1979,provided data showing $4.69 in 1978. In 1979 the cost will increase, since
that this relationship remains true today. the city's negotiated contract with the private haulers
provides for an escalator equal to the increase in the
local consumers price index from November to
Robbinsdale cost low . St. Paul city crews and November,or about 10.2%.
some individual arrangements high. Currently, rates
run from $2.51 per month for weekly service under a St. Louis Park has a contract that runs through 1982
citywide contract in Robbinsdale, to $6.04 per at $3.62 an extra 18 cents per month for administration and
per month,with the city charging residents
month for 50 pickups per year by city crews in 20%
of St. Paul . . . up to$7.50 per month for some indi- an
vidual arrangements in some suburban communities. billings.
In Robbinsdale, the net cost to the average resident The City of Edina just let a contract for the Morning-
is particularly favorable, since it is financed out of side area residents for 1979. Under the contract
twice-weekl service will be provided for $4.50 per
property taxes, which are deductible on one's income month, with extra charges for large, bulky items.
M return. However,the Robbinsdale figure does not The contractor bills each household directly for the
cover the administrative cost the city incurs in set service. The city requires that all refuse be kept in
set-
ting up and administering the program. Both in St. y q
enclosed areas out of sight from the public. Accord-
Paul municipal collection, and in Robbinsdale,there ingly, most residential stops in Edina require carrying
are extra charges for large,bulky items, such as fur- the rubbish out from within garages.
niture and household appliances. This is generally
true for most arrangements between a private hauler
and individual households.
-2- '
Savings substantial. While the Edina (Morningside) resi- The median price among 26 haulers serving St. Paul and
dents get twice-weekly service for $4.50 per month, prices first-ring suburbs was $4.50 per month for curb and alley
we received over the phone from private haulers serving service and $5.00 per month for in-yard carry-out of house
the balance of Edina with once-a-week service ran from wastes.
$5.00 to$6.00 per month.
RECENT STUDIES FIND LACK OF COMPETITION COSTLY
The Minneapolis/St. Paul Study done by the State Planning The Report of the Municipal Finance Commission to
Agency for the Legislature found that: Minneapolis could Mayor Albert A. Hofstede and the Minneapolis City Coun-
have saved approximately one million dollars a year if all cil just completed in January recommended that: Before
work had been done by private haulers, and a competitive the current collection contract expires, the City should
rate had been negotiated or obtained through bids . . . St. devise a less costly, more competitive alternative contract-
Paul is considering alternatives to its present open hauling ing system such as bidding out individual routes to private
system, and is facing the same kinds of pressures that led contractors and city crews.
Minneapolis to deal exclusively on a non-bid basis with a
consortium of private haulers (Summary Report, p. 70).
OBJECTIVES OF A GOOD SYSTEM
The League finds that it is useful to examine some of the ence in Blaine, Columbia Heights, Deephaven, Edina (Mor-
characteristics of a good refuse collection system. ningside), Excelsior, Farmington, Hopkins, Minneapolis,
Robbinsdale, St. Louis Park, Shakopee, Stillwater and
* A regular, complete and dependable pick-up of White Bear Lake shows that a community's refuse collec-
refuse should be provided all households. tion needs can be met in an efficient and effective way by
organizing the system on a community-wide basis.
* The provision of the service should be mandatory.
Those communities letting competitive bid contracts with
* Refuse collection should be organized officially private haulers have shown that considerable savings to indi-
with only one truck collecting along any given sec- vidual households can be achieved through this process.
tion of street or alley. Indirect savings are achieved when the system is financed
out of general municipal funds, and the resulting property
* The system should be responsive to the concerns of tax is deductible on one's income tax return.
individual households and neighborhoods served.
Public billing for refuse collection is cost-effective vis-a-vis
* The system should be designed to promote price having the users pay the contractor directly,since it can be
competition among alternative vendors and keep incorporated into regular water and sewer billings, and
down the cost to the community. there is less likelihood of non-payment. However,the same
advantage could also be achieved through some other form
Current experience shows the way. Several local munici- of centralized billing . . . perhaps through a contract with
palities now largely meet the above objectives. The experi- the electric or gas utility.
.3-
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Those suburban communities not now contracting for Provide Flexibility. In the first case, the Planning
citywide regular and complete residential refuse collec- Council would have some flexibility over what ser-
tion should do a feasibility study of the relative advan- vices are provided and how they are organized. For
tages of such an arrangement. The larger communities example, the refuse collection might be merged with
may find it desirable to divide the community into seve- a program to recycle materials separated out at the
ral neighborhoods or community refuse collection dis- individual household level.
tricts, each with its own separate refuse collection con-
tract. Eliminate City Crews. St. Paul would no longer need,
and should no longer retain, its municipal refuse col-
Multiple contracts could allow more vendors to compete lection crews under the new mandatory collection
for the business and allow community input into the system proposed.
monitoring and evaluation of the service provided. Some
portions of a municipality might like or require a differ- Funding Options. The new system could be financed by
ent type of service. For example, residents in areas with special property tax assessments,charges added to the
alleys are likely to find carry-out service relatively less water billings, the general fund (property tax), or a
attractive than those without alleys. property tax levy restricted to duplexes, triplexes,
and single-family dwellings. Either general fund
Specific areas a feasibility study should explore are: financing or a levy restricted to the types of property
serviced would allow the expense to be deducted on
What service is to be provided; the homeowner's income tax return.
How the service would be monitored and complaints 3. Minneapolis should now take a portion of the city
handled; served by municipal refuse collection crews and let it
out on a competitive bid contract to a private firm.
How the system would be financed;
The results of this effort should be used to determine
The length of the contract; the relative merits of dividing the entire city into compe-
titive bid districts for the conversion to that process at
The provision for any cost adjustments on a the time the city's current contract with Minneapolis
term contract;and Refuse,Inc.,expires.
Provisions covering the assurance of the contractors' Background. Minneapolis now has a mandatory system
performance of residential collection, using both public and private
haulers. Municipal crews collect 45 per cent of the
refuse, and an organization of private haulers called
2. St. Paul should move to a mandatory residential refuse Minneapolis Refuse, Inc., (MRI) collect 55 per cent of
collection system with competitive bid contracting the refuse.
within the 17 community planning districts.
• If there is adequate interest within a Community The Minneapolis system was set up in 1970 when the
Planning Council, the City should give the Planning City went to combined wet garbage and refuse collec-
Council authority to be the contracting agency tion. A group of 49 private haulers formed MRI to nego-
within guidelines established citywide as to the ti ate a single contract with the City. Each hauler was
funds available per household and minimum stan- given his same market share within MRI as he had in the
refuse collection market in Minneapolis in 1968.
dards.
* If there is not a desire on the part of a Community As part of the current five-year contract, the city crews
Planning Council to assume this responsibility, the increased their share of the collection 1,500 households
City should let refuse contracts directly for the dis- each of the first two years and are increasing their share
trict on a competitive bid basis. 1,000 households per year the last three years.
-4- '
The Minneapolis system assures the private haulers com- alley, and only 19 per cent involve a carry-out from
pact, well-organized collection routes.Since it is paid for within the yard.
by property taxes, reimbursement for service is assured. One would expect that the expense of collection would
As noted previously, the standard refuse collection in be fairly comparable with first-ring suburban communi-
Minneapolis does provide for the regular pick-up of ties that have organized a citywide mandatory collection
bulky items for which there would be an extra charge in system. This assumes that the pick-up of large bulky
most communities. However, 81 per cent of the stops items is at least offset by the lower costs of servicing the
provided by the private contractors are at the curb or per
following table, the cost m tll u shown in
fact much ch higher.
� -5-
REFUSE COLLECTION ARRANGEMENTS IN TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA
Total
Type of Service Monthly Nature of Contract
Community Curb or Alley
.Out Costs Agreement Period Financing
ANOKA X $3.75
Negotiated N.A. City Billing
Extra Items (Ad.Included)
at Curb
Competitive 1977 through City Billing
BLAINE 100% Ad. Included) 1979
Ad. lncluded) Bidding
October 1977 City Billing
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 50% 50% $3.30(.40 Competitive
Ad. Included) Bidding to Oct.1980
100% $3.x54 Competitive May 1977 to City Billing
Limit Bidding
DEEPHAVEN 30 May 1979
Limit
$3.17 Competitive March 1978 to City Billing
EXCELSIOR 100% Bidding March 1979
Negotiated 5-year to Property Tax
MINNEAPOLIS 8196 19% 6I Included July 1980
Ad. lncluded Contract
10.3%Escalator
Some Mostly $2.51 (No Competitive January 1979 to Property Tax
ROBBINSDALE Ad.Included) Bidding January 1980
100% $4.0008 Negotiated 1978 through Special Annual
ST.LOUIS PARK Ad.Included) Contract 1982 Assessment
Mostly Some $3.12(.10 Competitive To March 1980 City Billing
SHA KOPE E Ad.Included)
Negotiated Yearly price– City Billing
STI LLWATER 100% d3included) 6 yr.
WHITE BEAR LAKE 100% $4.28(.45 Competitive Juuly11,1978 to City Billing
Ad.Included) Bidding
1009L $4.50 2/week Competitive 1-1 through Hauler Bills
EDINA-MORNINGSIDE (No Ad.Inc.) Bidding 12-31 yearly Quarterly
FARMINGTON 100%
$4.50 City Crews — City Billing
HOPKINS 70% 30% $5.50 lest. City Crews
N.A. Property Tax
$203,000/3,000
Dwellings)
MINNEAPOLIS N.A. N.A. Property Tax
Ad.I
(City Crews) 74% �6%
Ad.Included)
ST. PAUL $6.04 N.A. N.A. City Billing
(City Crews) 100`x'
INDIVIDUAL N.A. Hauler Bills
HOUSEHOLDS• X $3.75-5.00 Set Price
($4.50/mo.)
INDIVIDUAL N.A.
HOUSEHOLDS • X $4.50-7.50 Set Price
($5.00/mo.)
• Sample of 25 haulers
f kr CITY OF SHAKOPEE
129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
MEMO
istrator
TO: Do RP �iPr
FROM: Gre M. Voxland Finance Director
SUBJECT: Garbage Quotations
DATE: March 13 1979
e contract as it presently
I have discussed the terms of our garbag items were brought out:
stands with Shakopee Services . The following
1 . The hauler (Shakopee Services) can handle commercial oVets
(containerized) IAW our present contract . He is
the concept of limiting the contract to residential service only .
refer a one year contract . He quoted rates
2 . The hauler would p it
for one year (1979) . I feel that if a contract is awarded ,
Also , a one year rather ntwo
should be for a full year.
year eases the cash flow problem related to bonding for the
He feels that a $40 ,000 bond is more than is necessary
hauler .
since it represents about sildmbt
eableeton and
make other
would default , the City shou
in less time than that .
to Shakopee Services , he would desire
3 . If the contract would g o ui ment to assure
60-90 days notice in order to acqu ire
the Phe City.
the level f service he desires to provide
MEMO TO: Douglas S . Reeder
City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland
City Treasurer
RE : 1979 Garbage Service Quotations
DATE: March 6 , 1979
I have received three quotations to date for City garbage
service for the balance of 1979 . They are :
G & H Sanitation $3 .45 & $2 . 65
Mark' s Sanitation $3 .45 & $3 . 35
Shakopee Services $3 .25 & $2 .10
These are monthly rates and ebill would
foreedd to a add
dean to
additional 10 cents (10¢) per
cover our other costs associated with the service .
These quotations were made under somewhat tentative
conditions and the details would need to be worked out in
the form of an agreement or a contract .
Also , it should be considered to limiting service to
residential customers onl ( single family and duplexes
and individual townhouses . This would simplify the
situation involving containers , and was the preferred
arrangement by many of the haulers that I contacted.
GV/jiw
i
C
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S . Reeder , City Administrator
RE: Hiring of Graduate Intern As A Planning Assistant
DATE: March 14, 1979
David A. Dacquisto is available to serve a six month graduate
internship with the City starting in the month of April .
The program is identical to the one under which Janes Dittrich
was hired as Nancy Engman' s replacement .
David is a graduate student with a degree in Urban and Regional
Studies . He has already completed an undergraduate internship for
the City of Mankato in transportation planning.
David' s courses and work experience have given him a firm back-
ground for assisting the City in its planning efforts . David' s
responsibilities would center on review of plats , zoning requests ,
and monitoring the City' s comprehensive planning efforts .
We do need assistance in these areas and the City has budgeted
for this position. It will be full time with a salary of $800.00 a
month. I recommend Dave be hired to start in the month of April .
DSR/ jsc
1U �
March 15 , 1979
Mr. Douglas Reeder
City Administrator
129 E . lst Ave.
Shakopee, Minn. 55379
It is hereby with this letter that I submit my
resignation as Assistant City Engineer, effective
March 30, 1979 . I have accepted a similar position
with the City of Austin, Minnesota.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank the
City of Shakopee for giving me the chance to gain
valuable experience. I will forever be indebted
to the City of Shakopee for this experience.
Sincerely,
Jon W. Erichson
_ - THIS 11TrER WAS SENT TO r RIBEPS OF
BLUE LAKE SLUFXT' DISPOSAL COr"""ITrF�:
Carol Flynn, C;len Wallace,
Burt Oenis and ,Tim Daly
March 13, 1979 "RECEIVF
Ms. carol Flynn MAR 15 l�
1 4741 Elliot Avenue
Minneapolis, MR 55407 CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Dear carol:
The next Ong of the Blue Lake Sludge Disposal. Advisory
ccnmittee
will be held on ?Hatch 22, 1979 stat'the Blue Lake Treatment Plant
report O
of the repo n Status 1979 which was prepared by staff, and a co►�y of the
dated January Judge Lenertz relating to
Scott County District Court decision by to familiarize yourself
lawsuit that has been pending. I would ask you
in preparation for our next meeting.
with these
examine the
As you lam, the original charge Of our Cfrni.ttee was to
relative merits of the Shirco incineration method as cM1.0artA to
land spreading of sludge. Time constraints now camel
ssion any rwMrendations or findings
back to the Waste Control Co mi s be prepared
that we may have. Therefore, I would ask the ttee sbould be
to reach conclusions at our next meeting. ee Ccm
prepared to decide at least the follaaing qu
1. Would the Shirco incineration method be recamnend
2. If so, what caveats or conditions would be attached'
3. Would land spreading be ride'
1
i
� 4. If so, what caveats or conditions would be attache ?
i
If you have any questions, Please give me a call.
i
Very truly yours
i
Richard A. Beens
Chairmn, Blue Lake Sludge Disposal Ccmnittee
I
RAB:Pd
IIIzcl.
I Richard J. Dough', B. J. Harringtcui,
Walter K. Johnson, William G.
cc. Barbara L. Lukermaruz► Moore,"Drug Reeder
350IMETROJOURREBLDG. i
7TH G, PAUL(T n 55101 1
E I ,
ry
Law Offices of MAR 13 1979
KRASS, MANAHAN . MEYER & KANNING CI
R.Kress
Chartered
John M.Manahan
Shakopee Professional Building Barry K.Meyer
1221 Fourth Avenue East Phiffp T.Kanning
Shakopee,Minnesota 55379
(612)445-5080
March 12, 1979
Ms. Kathleen Morris
428 South Holmes Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
Re: Waste Control Commission -vs Shakopee and Scott County
Dear Kathleen:
Enclosed please find copies of motion and accompanied
documents I am making on the sludge farm case. We have set it
for 9:00 a.m. on the 19 of March -in Shakopee recognizing that
Judge Lenertz may be elsewhere and we may have to do some traveling.
I attempted to reach you today prior to setting the time but was unable
to do so and hope you or someone from your office will be able
to attend the hearing. I would like a chance to talk to you about
what the county would like to do ultimately with this decision.
Yours very truly,
KRASS, MANAHAN, MEYER & KANNING
Chartered
Phillip R. Krass
PRK:mjj
CC: Doug Reeder
Law Off ices of
KRASS, MANAHAN , MEYER & KANNING
Phillip R.Kress
Chartered m v John M.Manahan
! . _s Barry K.Meyer
Shakopee Professional Building Philip T.Kanning
1221 Fourth Avenue East
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 MAR 13 1979
(612)445-5080
Karc� 12, 1979
�Y..i�,
Mr. Dave Graven
Holmes, Kirchner & Graven Law Firm
4610 IDS Center
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Dear Mr. Graven:
Enclosed please find my notice of motion, motion, proposed
new findings and affidavit. These are served upon you pursuant
to Minnesota sconversationoanduagreement.aThanka h our
March
you for your
courtesy.
Yours very truly,
KRASS, MANAHAN, MEYER & KANNING
Chartered
Phillip R. Krass
PRK:mj j
CC: Doug Reeder
WV
Law Offices of ►a � 4 1
}'CRASS, MANAHAN , MEYER & KANNING HAKOpftIIpR.Kress
Chartered John M.Manahan
Shakopee Professional Building Barry K.Meyer
1221 Fourth Avenue East Philip T.Kanning
Shakopee,Minnesota 55379
(612)445-5080
March 12, 1979
Honorable Lawrence L. Lenertz
P.O. Box 4
South St. Paul, MN 55075
Dear Judge Lenertz:
I have spoken with Mr. Graven and subject to your approval
established a hearing on my motions relative to the Waste Control
Commission lawsuit for Monday, March 19 at 9:00 a.m. in Shakopee.
Both Mr. Graven and I understand that you may not be in Shakopee
that day and we are fully prepared to attend your chambers wherever
they might be located. If you could simply let me know where they
are I will contact Mr. Graven and we will both be present at 9:00
o'clock. Thank you.
Yours very truly,
KRASS, MANAHAN, MEYER & KANNING
Chartered
Phillip R. Krass
PRK:mjj
CC: Dave Graven
Doug Reeder
1:
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF SCOTT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL
COMMISSION File No. 23226
Petitioner,
-vs- NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION
CITY OF SHAKOPEE,
COUNTY OF SCOTT
Defendant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TO THE ABOVE NAMED PLAINTIFF AND DAVID L. GRAVEN, ITS
ATTORNEY, AND TO THE COUNTY OF SCOTT AND R. KATHLEEN MORRIS, ITS
ATTORNEY:
YOU WILL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on the ,,19th day of
March, 1979, at 9:00 a.m. or soon thereafter as coL //el can be
heard in the District Courtroom in the District Courthouse in the
City of Shakopee County of Scott, the undersigned shall make the
attached motions based upon the files, exhibits, and minutes of
the court in this matter together with the attached Affidavit.
MOTION
Comes now the Defendant City of Shakopee and does move
the Court for its order as follows:
1. For an order granting a new trial under Rule 59 of
the Rules of Civil Procedures for District Courts and in particular
subdivision four thereof. The newly discovered evidence pertains to
the existence of polychlorinated biphenyls, commonly known as PCBs.
2. In the alternative, for its order granting ammended
findings of fact and conclusions of law in the manner proposed on
Appendix A, attached hereto and part hereof.
I \w of F1(FS 3. In the alternative, for an order ammending the con-
RASS and NIA\APIA\
CHARTERED endix B which is attached
1221 4-f11 A\V. E.
cl usi ons of law in the manner said forth in App
111\KOPEE. M.N. 55379
hereto and made a part hereof.
A'RIOR LAKE: OFFICE
305 CENTRAL A%E. N.
Y.O. BOX 253
RIOR LAKE, NI\. 5$372
U � ,
4. For such other and further relief as the court may deem
just and proper under the circumstances.
That said Motion will be made upon all the files, records
and proceedings herein; upon the gorunds set forth in the Statutes
of the State of Minnesota; upon the grounds set forth in the attached
papers; and upon such other and further grounds as to the Court
may seem just and equitable.
KRASS, MA & KANNING
CHART
i
' R. K s
A orney for Defendant
1221 East Fourth Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Telephone: 445-5080
i
6
r
i
i
i
{
t
}
f
LAW OFFK FS
BRASS and MANAHAN
CHARTERED
1221 4 171 AN V. E.
SII%KOPEF., Nh. $5379
PRIOR LAKE OF'F1C'F. j
305 CENTRAL A%'E. N.
P.O. BOX 253 `
PRIOR LAKE, M.N. 55372
J))
tl
1.
P
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF SCOTT DISTRICT COURT
---------------------------------------------------------------------
METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL
COMMISSION
Petitioner, PROPOSED
AMMENDED
-vs- FINDINGS OF FACT,
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND
CITY OF SHAKOPEE ORDER FOR JUDGMENT
COUNTY OF SCOTT
Defendant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The above-entitled matter came duly on before the undersigned,
one of the judges of the above-named court, at the Courthouse, Shakopee,
Scott County, Minnesota, on May 30, 31, June 1, 2, 5, and 6, 1978.
David L. Graven and Larry M. Wertheim, of the law firm of
Holmes, Kirchner, & Graven, 4610 IDS Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402,
appeared for the Plaintiff. Phillip R. Krass and Michael Boo, of the
law firm of Krass, Manahan, Meyer & Kanning, 1221 Fourth Avenue East,
Shakopee, Minnesota, 55379, appeared for the Defendant City of Shakopee.
Dennis Patrick Moriarty, Scott County Attorney, Courthouse, Shakopee,
i
{ Minnesota, 55379, appeared for the Defendant County of Scott.
The court having heard the testimony adduced and considered
the evidence, the arguments of counsel and the submitted briefs, and
;i
being advised in the premises, makes the following Findings of Fact,
Conclusions of Law and Order for Judgment.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Metropolitan government was established by statute, and a
state administrative agency, denominated the Metropolitan Council , was
established to, among other, things, coordinate a planning and development
guide for a designated metropolitan area, which includes Scott County,
1.Aw01 EKES Minnesota. Among its other- powers and duties the Metropolitan Council
RASS and MANAHAN
('II.ARTERF1) is to develop a plan for the collection and processing of hazardous
1.121 4T II A+E. E.
;u+KOreE, SIB. 55379 waste in the metropolitan i tan ar�pa.
(Stat, 473. 149)
PRIOR LAKE OFFICE
30 CfVFRAI. A%1,. ti.
PA). "OX 253
'RIOR LAKE, NIX. 55372
i
r
2. As part of the metropolitan government certain commissions
were established, one being the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission,
with specific purpose and duty, "with the council ," to "operate and
maintain all interceptors and treatment works for the collection, treat-
ment and disposal of sewage in the metropolitan area." (Stat. 473.502)
3. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission constructed
s,
a facility as part of its duty and policy under the law, in the City
of Shakopee, Minnesota, which is now in operation.
1 .
4. As part of the process of handling sewage and end result f
of the process results in a composition of material known as sludge* .
which results when the sewage material is gravity thickened, undergoes
anaerobic digestion and centrifugal dewatering.
5. The end result, sludge, is a hazardous waste, the known
it
hazards being a heavy concentration of nitrogenous products and heavy
metals. There is also a possibility of a harmful-to-human environment
3
of virus, bacteria, or chemical content therein.
6. There are at the moment two principal methods of disposing
y
of sludge: (a) incineration, and (b) spreading on bare land and raising
crops thereon. The latter method handles the nitrogen problem but leaves
the heavy metals probably no deeper than eight inches beneath the ground
surface. If incinerated, the resulting waste, still hazardous, must
be somehow disposed of.
S
7. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission plans on estab-
3i
lishing a sludge-handling facility in Shakopee, and has purchased bare
land in Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota, described as about 593 acres
already under exercised option to the MWCC with a total acreage planned
of approximately 700 acres, being located in Sections 15, 16, 21, and 22
in Township 115, Range 22, and bound
;; ed on the east by County Road 21,
on the west by County Road 83, on the north by County Road 16, and
partially on the south by the Shakopee-Prior Lake border, upon which
l.AN' 01 FICk:S
to spread the sludge and plant crops.
RASS and AIANAHA\
CIIARTERLD
1221 4TH A%E. E.
1LiK(11'Et:. %1\. 55379 2
PRIOR LAKE: O k 1('t:
xkS CENTRAL A%E. N.
P.O. BOX 253
RIOR 9.AKE. N1\. 55372
a.
f
8. The policy, duty and plans, including the crop planting,
of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission are not an agricultural
activity but are all part of the policy, plan and duty of the Metropoli-
tan Waste Control Commission to dispose of sewage waste, and the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission is not in any sense engaged in
any agricultural pursuits.
9. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has been given
the authority under Section 473. 504 Subdivision 9 of Minnesota Statutes
to acquire, construct, operate and maintain all interceptor and treat-
ment works necessary for the collection treatment and disposal of
sewage in the Metropolitan area.
10. The City of Shakopee is a statutory city authorized under
�
�nes�ta Statutes Section 462. 357 Lo regulate land use within its j
corporate boundaries through zoning. i
11. The City of Shakopee is charged by Minnesota Statutes
Section 462. 351 Subdivision 1 to plan for the area within its torpor-
+ ate boudaries.
'F 12. The property is generally zoned R-2, residential , with
i
a small portion zoned C-2 conservation and under neither of these two
uses is the disposal of sewage a permitted use.
13. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission applied for a
5 conditional use permit to allow it to dispose of sludge on the above
' described property, and said conditional use permit was denied byf.
et I
unanimous vote of the City Council of the City of Shakopee.
14. The City of Shakopee has paramount interests in this matter
do to the health and welfare of its citizens being at stake, due to the
zoning and planning powers and obligations it has relative to property
located within the City of Shakopee including the subject property and
finally due to the fact that an alternative cheaper method of disposal ,
infrared incineration, has been discovered by the Waste Control Commission.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
LAW M+K[IS
BASS and MANAHAN
01AR EKED 1. The proposed use by the Metropolitan Waste Control
A
1221 41 %. $5374
Commission of the property in question is not a permitted use under
PRIOR LAKE OFFICE
wS CENTRAL AN'E. A.
P.O. Boa 253 3
RIOR LAKE. %IN. 55372
the City of Shakopee zoning ordinance.
2. That the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission is not
a superior governmental body to the City of Shakopee or the County of
Scott.,
3. That a balancing of the public interests require that
under the findings set forth above the City of Shakopee's public interest
in zoning is paramount to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's
desire to spread sludge within the City of Shakopee.
�y
4. Plaintiff' s prayer for declaratory judgment as set forth
in its prayer for relief is in all things denied.
r
!' ORDER FOR JUDGMENT
{i
Let judgment be entered accordingly thirty days from and after
i the date hereof. 1
1�
rr
{� Lawrence L. Lenertz, Judge
First Judicial District
Dated: March 1979.
i�
i
i 1
t
�y r
4
I! i
{s
{,q
is
r'
r
LAW 0H ICES
RASS and MANAHAN
CHARTERED
1221 4TH A%E, E.
i111K01'E:E, �i\. 5537Y t
PRIOR LAKE OFFICE 4.
?05 CENTRAL A%E. N.
P.O. BOX 253
'RIOR LAKE. %IS. 55372
t
PROPOSED AMMENDED CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The end product of the Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission Shakopee Sewage Facility, commonly known as Sludge, is
declared to be a hazardous waste under the terms of Minnesota Law
and in particular under Minnesota Statutes 116.06 Subdivision 13.
2. That any storage, transportation, or disposal of hazar-
dous waste on the property owned by the Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission within the City of Shakopee shall be in accordance with all
i
E.
f laws and regulations, Federal , State, and Regional dealing with hazardous
s? waste.
r:
3. Upon the express conditions that the Metropolitan Waste
Control Commission has full approval of its plans and procedures and
all details by the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Pollution
Control Agency, and the Environmental Protection Agency, and is
operating under all laws and rules established by and for said agencies,
f it may proceed with its program to establish sludge processing facilities
c
on its Shakopee plant and dispose of the same on land hereinbefore
described without any necessity of having local government approval ,
ai thlat^ Pity or Vounty.
(# 4. There is no estoppel in this case, the Metropolitan Waste
'!
Control Commission cannot abrogate its duties u nder the law even if
�i
i it desired to do so.
1
c
i
i+
1�
1� 4
LAW OFFICES
RASS and N1ANAIIAN
CHARTERED Appendix B.
1221 JTII A%V. E. 4
SIIAKOPEE, M%. $5379 }}
i
PRIOR LAKE OFFICE �€ 4
165 CENTRAL A%E. N.
P.O. BOX 253 4
'IUOR LAKE, Vii\. $5372 t
d
1
a
STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF SCOTT
METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL
COMMISSION
Petitioner,
AFFIDAVIT
-vs-
CITY OF SHAKOPEE,
COUNTY OF SCOTT
Defendant.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
County of Scott )
PHILLIP R. KRASS, beiny duly sworn upun uath deposes arid
says as follows: That he is the attorney for the City of Shakopee
one of the Defendants in the above entitled to matter. That subsequent
to the trial in this matter which was held from May 30 through June 6,
and subsequent to the courts findings of fact conclusions of law order
for judgment signed February 21, 1976, an article appeared in the
Monday, February 26, 1979, Minneapolis Tribune relative to toxic chemicals
found in sewage sludge wherein it appears representatives of the
Plaintiff have acknowledged existence of toxic chemicals called PCBs
in the sludge that the Plaintiff intends to spread on the farm land over
which this litigation insued. The City of Shakopee was unaware prior
to this said article of the existence of said PCBs in the Blue Lake
Waste Water Treatment Plant Sludge and at no time previously had any
representatives of the Plaintiff acknowledged the existence of said
toxic chemicals in the sludge it intends to dump in Shakopee.
Due to the questions being raised in the attached article
and by others relative to PCBs, the City of Shakopee feels it is
necessary for the court to take and receive evidence relative to the
PCBs and their potential hazards relative to the City of Shakopee's
I.AW 011'ICES
(ASS AR El,\N,\Ir`'N claim that its zoning interests in said land are paramount.
CHARTERED
1221 4'1 If A\E. E.
.11.\KOPF:F:, \I\. 5537v
PRIOR LAKE: OFFICE
P.O. BOX 253
RIOR LAKE, 55372
yy
i
i
In the alternative the City of Shakopee has proposed
entirely new findings of fact conclusions of law and an order for
judgment for the court to consider.
Should the court reject the first and second motion of
Defendant City of Shakopee, the City of Shakopee would propose that
the court consider amending its first conclusion of law to more accur-
ately encompass and reflect the findings that the court has made and
the City of Shakopee has proposed an alternate conclusions of
law for the court's consideration.
i
Further affiant saith not.
1 R. Krass
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 1) day of /4A.LC'.,/i 1979.
i
Notary Public �!
4
3
Xw"" PATRICIA MARY SCHMIDT
k+ ' NOTARY PUBLIC•MINNESOTA
NENNEPIN COUNTY •
Ny COmmisalon Expires Nov.11.1985 I
`d`wIIId�iNPMI7I..NN �t
f
1
t�
t
1
i
1
1
i
LAW OFFICES
(ASS and MANAWLN
CHARTERED
i
1221 4TII A%F. E.
114KOPEE. %IX. $5379
q ,t
PRIOR LAKE OFFICE 1�
SOS CENTRAL AVE. N.
P.O. BOX 253
AWN LAKE. MN. 55372
i'r<<
winneapDo is' Sludge
Continued from page 113
Johnson said higher than usual con-
centrations have been found in the
" waste of a Shakopee roofing firm.
But he contended that such dis-
charges are not enough to account
for the over-all levels found in the
sludge.
Lukermann said further efforts V11
Metro news be made to trace the'PCB sources
and to monitor the chemical's con-,
CORtJCS/TV Radio Monday ; centrations in the sludge.
February 26
1979 ! The PCB Issue could become more I
than academic if the commission
wins a lawsuit with Shakopee. The
agency wants to use farmland there
to spread some of the sludge from Its
Blue Lake treatment plant on the
Minnesota River. But Lukermann
said.nearby residents objected, and
the city would not approve a permit.
The commission filed suit last sum-
mer,and a decision is expected soon.
Lukermann said that if the commis-
e a shot wins and if it rams convinced eoludge Toxic chemicals found in s that PCB concentrations do not case
a threat, it probably will proceed
with its plans to spread sludge on the
By flan Wascoe Jr... disposal of sludge,according to plans Johnson said he does not regard the tratiors found In the sludge fall with. Shakopee land.
Staff Writer, -of the commission•and the Metro- • commission's method of land-sprentd- in a "gray area between known' But If enough questions are raised to
.r _..r.a ,��..'. politan Councll. Sludge is the solid '. Ing as hazardous because the 'PCB .,•Safe iy-and known. bazard�
Toxic chemicals called PCBs h6ve ;;r*sldue of treated4'awage,; -- concentrations ro very low End t>c-'"�a�,til ,a eancentrattoa of ene milli- make spreading unwise or politically
been found In the sewage nudge that °.' caiise the sludge is'plowed 106 farm- gram or-less pgr.kilogram of sludge:~.. unacceptable, the commission may
is being spread on farmland near.the :Vialter Johnson,the commission's dl- • land, It is not spread on testy foliage is considered safe. The range of,one s , have to rely entirely on incineration.
'twin Cities. rector of quality control, estimated that Is then eaten by dnimals or to 10 milligrarris"may or may not be � Although Johnson said the agency's
that no more than 80,000 tons of "people, he said. Such direct con- of concern," he snid. Concentrations furnaces are hot enough to destroy
But metropolitan, waste-control offs- ' sludge are spread on land each year sumption is the only wny that PCBs In the commission's sludge have the PCBs—more than 1,200 degrees
slats say they don't plan Ao change -about 10 percent of all the sludge have been shown to enter the food been measured at three to 11 milli- — Incineration poses potential air
iheir land-spreadiag procedures yet produced at the commission's treat- •chain,he said. grams — usually less than five, he pollution problems.
because they have no proof that tee ment plants. The rest is burned and mod• `Meanwhile, the Metropolitan Coun-
ICB concentrations are harmful. the ash trucked to landfills. "We're just going to put it'on the ell, parent agency of op*11t ste OUn-
ground and plow it in and grow The source of the PCBs Is unknown,
'nere Is no evidence that (the land- PCBs stands for polychlorinated bl- corn," he said. 'You're not going to, even though the commission takes mission, has called for as much land
;;,reading method) would be an envi- phenyls. Since the 1920s, PCBs have eat the soiL" samples from different parts of Its spreading as passible, within envi-
foamental hazard,"said Barbara Lu- been used as insulating fluids, is systems,.. ronmental and health limits.It's part
*ermann, chairwoman of the Metro- heavy-duty electrical equipment. Nevertheless, Lukermann said, the •+ ' of.a growing movement.to recycle
olltaa Waste Control Commission, More recently they have been asso- concentrations are "enough to mike "We're not finding it at the obvious the Twin Cities'wastes.
r,an interview last week. ciated with birth defects,cancer,and me concerned." sources," Lukermann said. "It's a The recent PCB findings have not
liver ailments in fish and laboratory mystery story." led recent .offtclsla to predict t
�� A spreading could become a ma• animals An aura of uncertainty'hangs ever
j,.r Otemative to Incineration for the the issue, because the PCB concen• Sludge continued on page 4B change in that emphastli, but they
'admit uncertainty about how danger-
f. ous the problem could become.
197Q LILY 1W SHAKUPLE REGISTER ol Po 79 P&GF____l
LHLLK NO. DATE AMOUNT WENDUR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. TNV, N P.O. 0 ME9SAGF
074003 4.05 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4?20-121-32
Ol4O03 03/15/79 9.71 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY SMALL TOOLS 01-4225-441-44
014003 03/15/79 50.58 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY FUUIP,MAINT, 01-4230--421-42
074(103 03/15/79 21,09 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY EWUIPsMAINT,
074003 03/15/79 167,12 AUTO CENTRAL VEHIC LE MAINT.
674v03 03/ici/19 S5.15 -----AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY FWUIP,MAINT6
01:4230-621-62
§UPPLY
_ FF V 01-y23?-321-Z2 L
01JU03 03i15/79 46.66 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY
074003 03/15/79 88.30 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINT, 01-4232-421-42
0/4003 03/15/79 52.20 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY VLHICLE MATNT 01-4232-621.62
490 H6
07400b 03/15/79 561.25 EARL F. ANDERSON SIGNS 01-425n-421-42 18899
561.29
0740oo 03i15/19 38,41----- AK_ IN_SFIRF _EQUjP_.___ GtN, suPPLIES 01-4220-321-32 9235
014008 03/15/79 198.00 AKINS FIRE EQUIP* CAP-EQUIP. 01-4511-321-32 926n
040-14 03/15/79 - - 9450 ___-A E ST CONTROL PROF. SERVICES 01-4315-361-36 4319
94:50
074ulb 03/19/79 LN, SUPPLI E S. 0 I-4U0-1J2.t!t4?
__I_t454.7 --------
074021 n3/15/79 72,34 ARNIES MARINE FUUIP.MAINT. n1-4230-121-12 1794
_34
07402e 03/15/79 85.78 ANCON ENTERPRISES GLN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-141-14 10666
074022 03/I5/79 A5,78 ANCON ENTERPRISFS GLN. SUPPLIES 01-422-0-411-41 _j_Q066
ENG% _SFRVICES. olw431
17
074023 03/15/79 2,137..00 JACK ANDERSON, ASSOLq I
2,137.00
***-CI(S
014029 03/15/79 63.50 A & M INEWS.TRACTnk EWIJIP."AINT. mt-4230-621-62 65647
63.5 0
0!4034 03 l5 45.95 BATTERY WHSE. SER_V. VEHICLE MATNT. 01-423?-311-31 74945
• 074034 03/15/79 73.49 bATTEPY hHSF. SERV. VtHICLF PAINT. 01-423?-421-42 78692
I 119.38
w
1979 LItY_UF_._S�HAKUPEE_ --- _._ _---- ...---_--.- -_.-_---•._ CHECK REGISTER --- -_- --- - - - - - ---_-03 0_19__ PAGE 2 _.....
CHECK NO, VATE AMOUNT VENOUR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO, IN V, N P.U. A MEg34GF
####** ***-CKS
074037 -- --- —�_3/_15/79 __...------_---3-•�.1.LS�_ _`— _BANKER"_If_E . ------.---- — Hal.—IN�.�3E►3II._-------.11l_-&925-911_-4.L_—,.--- - _----
3.751.84 •
074u4u 03/15/79 29.16 BRYAN AGGREGATES ROAD MAT. 01-4240-427-42
_- .- 29.16-" - -
A**•CKS
074061 03/15/79 15.09 COAST 10 COAST OFF,8 SUPPLIES 01-4210-331-33
074061 03/15/79 17.50 COAST TO COAST FEN,SUPPLIES 01-4220-421-42
fl.99__---_CQASI�Il_&t1ASI —SM.PLL_1 0 1 _111-4225-421-42 — —---
074061 03/15/79 2,18 COAST TO COAST EWUIP,MAINT* 01-4230-321-32
074061 03/15/19 .79 COAST TO COAST ° 9LOG6 MAINZ. 01-4231-18t-18
____._.�LO(i.•_.1lALrLt,_ —.-O.L�423L•3.1L-.ii.---_------------_-----
51.27
074064 03/15/79 3,70 CLAYS PRINTING OFF. SUPPLIES 01-4210-141-t4 1527
074067 03/15/79 18.00 JULIU3 A. COLLER II MISC, 01-4990-161.16
18.00 * -
*#** ***-CKS
07-4078 _ . 03/15179 -. 121.50 _CY__-S -S.TANDAKD _ _VLHICLE _MAINT.--- 01_-4232.-311-31 --.----------_-------__.
( - 127.50 * l
If 014079 n3/1S/79 61.15 _...CL.UTCH_.A--V-JOINT .__...-_... EWl1IP.MAINT.`.__-
61. 15
-
0740A2 03/15/79 296.00 CONWAY FIRE &SAFETY CAP-FOU1P. nt-4511-321-32 16510
_._ 296.00
*###*#
014691 03/15/79 134.00 DONNELL CO. 91GNS 01-4250-421-42
134.00
****** -
***-CKS
014093 03/15/79 1b.20 UIINNING S HDAE. GLN.SUPPLIFS 01-4220-181-18
074093 03/15/79 9.74 DUNNING S HOWE. GEN.SUPPLIFS 01-4220-321-32
• 074093 03/15/79 4.13 DUNNING S HI?AF. EWIfIP.MAINT. 01-4230-321-32
30.01
1979 CITY OF SHAKOPE_E CHECK REGISTER 03 ?0 19 PAGE 3
I LHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCUUNT N0.
INV. N P.O. a MESSAGE
- `— ***-CKS —
0741042 03/15/79 55.20 D 3 A-_ENTERPRISES MUTOR LUBRT_CANTS _ 01-4222-311-3A_775
55.10
[-07*4103 03/15/79 2ge.ge DYNA BY9IEMSP. MAINT._ _ _ _
248.88
07ul21 03/15/79 10.32 EASTMAN DRUG GEN.SUPPLIFS 01-4220-321-32
----
074122 03/15/79 6.60 NANCY ENGMAN TRAVEL EXPENSE 01-4330-121-12
_..-- ----- - - --- -- 6'60*--
***-CKS
074124 05/15/79 30.00 WILLIAM ENGEL P1 FIRE DEPT, 01-4130-321-32
074124 03/15/79 4.50 WILLIAM ENGEL TRAVEL EXPENSE 01-4330-321-32
3v.50 *
• •#*-CKS "
014131 03/15/79 14. 72550 ELECTRIC SERVICE CAP-EQUIPMENT. 01-4511-351-35 g
141,725..50 # °
***-CKS
*sir* * -- - ----- - — -- - -
074150 03/15/79 75,00-_-_ FONDER CAR►ET__GL,NG.,—___iBLOG�_MAINT_*--_
75.00
074151 03/15/79 _32.25 EARL FLECK TRAVEL EXPENSE 01-4330-311-31
I_ _ --------------32.25-*- - --- ------ — --- -- - --- ------ -- -- —
S--
074158 03/15/79 15.00 FIRE INST. ASSN. RUOKS 01-4394-321-32 4566
_ 15.00
*#***# ***-CKS
070180 03/15/79 10.16 GE:NDREAU LUCKSMITH GtN.SUPPLIFS 01-4220-321-32
10.16
#* ***-CKS
074220_ 03/15/79 11.05 -HOWIE HFLLER TkAVFL ExHENSE - n1-4330-62.1-6
U74422U 03/15/79 1.90 HO%IE HELLER CONFERENCE 01-4390-621-62
16.95
R
074224 03/15/79 12.4210 HFNNEN-3 9KFLLY Fu'llP. MAINT. nl-4?3n-421..42 _
r
i
1979 CITY OF SHAKOPEE —T R E V E N U E R E P 0 R T A9 nF 1_3 LZR_ A
FUND 0 1 GENERAL FUND C U R R E N T M 0 N t.H Y E A R T Q ,D A 'T E ;
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION _— ___ $TAR.EIL1N.U1~__._--____1�C111A-L_ �►�FIANC�_P-Cr EST. REVENUE—�____AttUAL__ VARIINCE_.__OILL_�_
3011 GEN. LEVY - CURRENT 7,620.63 "00 7,620.63 7,620,;O 79.?
30-12 SP.LEVY - JUDGEMENTS _ .QO. SOD .,00_
015 w, a Y - MATCHING FUNDS .OQ X00 ,00 ,00
L 3016 SHADE TREE DISEASE too ,OQ .60 A4Q
3017 INC. INDL_R_COMM�OE1�.r_ _____------_-- -- X44--- --- ----_ —402_ - -.�
3020 DEL. PROPERTY TAXES .00 ,00 .00 ,00
3021 PENALTIES 1 INTEREST .00 on .00 .00
-- ---------------
***• TAXES On -1.620:63 7.620.63
_3111_LIQUOR_LICENSE3__--- _ -00 _— 40-4------__�90
3112 BEER LICENSES i .00 %00 .00 f1
3113 BINGO LICENSES 200.00 '00 200,00 'o:000
3114 CIGARETTE LI.CENP_U 306.00 ,00 306_90 1Q�-0Y 0
3115 MISC. BUSINESS ICEN8ES .QO 1,00 ,00 X00
3130 DOG LICENSES 20,06 ,00 20.00. 20..06
---3131_POOL_jABLE_4ICENSEB --------_-- :41t-_—__ -- _41151- 0.0���Oi►_�--�
3132 BUILDING PERMITS 1.176.50 ,00 1.176,50 1.176,56
3133 PLUMBING PERMITS 347.00 ,00 347,00 347, 00 g
3134 MECHANICAL PERMIT�9 549.75 .On 549.7 ,___ 5i44tZK_ A
3135 WELL PERMITS 11600 0.00 17.00 17to
3136 SEWER 9 WATER PERMITS 20.00 Atoo 20,00 Po"00
-3137 ELECTRICAL_PERMIS$_- --- 439..
3138 STREET OPENING PERMITS 44.00 ,00 44.00 44100 A
3139 MISC. NON-BUS. PERMITS .00 .00 .00 .00
i*** LICENSES R PERMITS 3,134,75 .on 3.114.75E 4.7S
'3310 FEDERAL GRANTS —_—_ ___� 711.13 ,'00 7, Lt Ll- �-
3320 STATE GRANTS 30,128.00 100 10.129.00 1o,128,00
3330 LOCAL GOVT. AID .00 '00 no ,09
3331 ATTACHED MACH, A .00 -,00 ,Q0 _-_-- --_
F3332 STATE HWY.MAINT, AID 70741,50 100 7.747.50 7.747;50,
3334 POLICE STATE AID .Ob ,00 ,QO , X00
3340 COUNYj ROAD & 9R1OGE_AID_ _J .�Q --- __ _---400_ --_—.__ .0.0.--_._.�„__.._,.f0�.___.V..
3360 SPUC PYMT.IN LIEU OF TXS. 20,032.00 .00 20.032.00 20.032.00
_**** GRANTS_6 AIDS _ 30&418,61 :0o 38.614.61__-�B.IiLfl.tiL�__�
I 3510 ENG, GRADE FEE 6.00 '00' 6400 0 06
.3511 P .___-PLAN AN CHECK_ FEE_- _ _ 7_14 Z.5_ ----. — ,00 .___ __._Z0-219 _. —Tlg4%25 ,--- — _J
j _
3812 ASSESSMENT SEARCHES - 10000 .00 10.00 10,00
3513 SALE OF MAPS 42.05 ,00 42,05 42,05
3514 PL AT8-REZON-VAR-COQ,-U9�___ __ 50.00 ,-tO.Il__
515 SURVEY CHECK FEE 6.00 '00 600 0,00
S17 MISC, PROPERTY REPITALS 250.00 %06 250,00 250100
I_ .-35-1-8 STREET__NEPAIR------ - - ------- •04_ . --.__- _-_-__--_tDQ _-_-_ _ _ 08 �tl2
3520 SNOW REMOVAL .00 ,On .00 ��-�%00- -+___�
3521 PUBLIC WORKS RENTALS .00 -t On 4n0 %06
- 3522_hEED_CUT_TI1jG CHARGES--- - ------ - -00_-----
3523 MISC.PB.WKS.SERVICES 11,00 on 71,00 1I,00
• 3524 SALE OF CITY PROPERTY 202.00 .O0 202600 202.00
LiJ '
L_0 a_QE_9tlAKDPF F_ _ R F V F N If E_ R_F P II R T •e OF---L-34-..73_ pJ►GF
FUND O1 GENERAL FUND C U R R E N Y MO4 YH YE AR T DATE
AC COUNT/DESCfR1PI.1.0N_ .rk8t, REVENUE AVNA.L— VARIANCE_—EC1 _.&EyElutlL__—__._.--ACTUAL yikouNCE_._PC�—__
3530 ACCIDENT REPORTS 55.00 '00 55.00 SS�OA
3531 MIOSL, PQLjCL__SEgyICE9 .00 �Oq Rip �II1L__
3532 POUND FEES R FINE$ 19400 {60 „ M90 19.00
3533 FIRE CALLS 6 STANDBY PEES 2,600,00 '00 ?4600.00 2.600%00
---3534 FIFE NUMQER_.FEES----- ------------ --------g•s0--- --- —100 — --__p.RD.._
3540 SEASON TICKETS-POOL '00 X00 .00 X00
3541 ADMISSIONS-POOL ,00 .0n .00
3542_SwIMMING LE9_40N8 _ -0n ---_S0m 0p_._-_ �Op
!F3543 MISC. POOL INCOME .00 ,00 10 "00
3610 COUNTY COURT FINE$ 1,796.49 "00 i,796.89 1479640
- 3-7-3-1 _GARB AGE-CQLLi__CNARGE9 - ---- --- ----- --•.0� X00--- -.40-- " --�Ad
3810 INTEREST .00 '00 .00 -- %00 —
3820 CONCESSIONS-POOL ,o0 .00 .00 1%00
_3ezy 9ALE_Qf G!9.QLIdE___ 33g.On s00 316 00 A;B�OII--
'r 3830 PERMANENT TRANSFERS .00 X00 .QO Oft
3850 CONTRIBUTIONS i DONATION .Od i00 .00 %oQ
L._3e5L_INPUBiBY_AGBEI~hEHt------- ---- --.00
3872 SP.ASSESS.-COUNTY .00 '00 .00 00
3873 DEVELOPERS DEPOSIT .00 X00 . .QO %00
3954_REF"N _9_A�EIY-11Jg9E►1EN19— 641__x? �QO 691.07
3990 MISCELLANEOUS 76.25 . ;06 76.25 76.21
--
•+!«*._O-THEF4-REVENUES_—_ IIO_
----E4l►VIZ-LO.IALS<_—. --5ti,294T60 .0n 5h .Pga A0 56.24u,6-0- I .
❑ L, _C LLY i SH_ALUPt E - E X P F N T T 11 R F R E-P O R T _ AS OF lzA'j-q_-RA G9 f
FUND O1 GENERAL FUND C .0 R R E N Y M 0 N H Y E A R T D A T E
ACCOUNT/DESCRIPTION--•- ---- _-_APLRdPRIA.iIDN�----AC�tlIIL-------.StARI-ANGE__PC1-_iiD ROP_Il ,tljnN___._-____&CTWL vAOAM k-.-_--ki-_-_.
4100 SALARIES-FULL TIME 24.623.55 64SA966,00 24.623.55 671�34Z�45 3.5
41L2-9-YERIIME-FULL_TIME 13n-41 AAA An 330.43 _6,AIIn
(4130 SALARIES - PART TIME 1444914? A00168,06 1.449-p2 78 AT1.8�S0 1.¢
L4140 PERA 14655.09 - 541615100 1.635.09 53,AO39491 346
4141 PEMSIGN$-FICA_ _.__. fl11.Z5-- 3,,84L�Oa-��.�s1I .7e�-____ z3%0At,,2A 1-4-,---
4142 PENSIONS FIRE .00 1' 14429.00 1 no 1,4529 00 10
4150 HEALTH R LIFE INSURANCE 855.39 } 324159%00 55.39 31,1303o4 61 7.7
415LWORKMEN.3&QMP INSURANCE .00,INSU
$ -:3611% 14109 tau-T�6i.3o�►�.0.4--�A
4152 UNEMPLOYMENT COMP, .00 14000,00 .00 1.Ob0.00 0
}
•• R PERSONAL_ 3ERVILE9._ _-290- 5.6Z AA;i.124..b; A-4.
4210 OFFICE SUPPLIES .00 4,810,00 .00 4,,810;OQ .�
4220_GENERP_.L..3U"' I.E$ .00 20;860,On -00 -2a�8.A4i00-^^-S
L4221 CHEMICALS .00 . 3300�00 " ,00 3;3004,00 �0
4222 M010R FUELS t LUBRICANTS 400 $d,{140400 no ?_dA100'On -0
4223 GLOZNING-.P_E 91EQUIPIaENL_ 2, 0336 t1y-00a100 6 _1-..716tha� 3S-6
4224 SAFETY SUPPLIES .00 950400 .00 95040Q .0
4225 SMALL TOOL PURCHASES .00 310S0%00 .00 3,lOSOt00 .0
42.30 _E i4s �ao 4i3�ga ! q
F-4231 6LDG.MAINT b REPAIR rob " 71755�Ob .00 T,AT'35 00
4232 VEHICLE MAINT. t REPAIR .QO 191d00�00 '00 19A800�OQ t�
4233 COMM._SYSTEH_.MAINT.------ ------ -- -----------+IIO 4 15D_;0A_ --_00 Si'.L5II.�0O ,n a
4234 UTIL.SYSTEM MAINT. 6 CON. .00 5.000100 .00 5,4000,00 ,0 a
4240 ROAD MATERIALS .00 4.1500%00 ,00 41500400 .0
4?41-Y-ATCHING__MAJERIALS____. _ -ADO t._nnn_aQ .00 bla- loo- �a s
F4242 SEAL COATING 604 9+1,1000400 .00" P2000400 J
4204 g243 .GR0UN09 MAINT, MATERIAt,!1 --- V r00 21000406 .00 2400040;ICE JONIROL-MATERIAL ---- --,0.0 31bO.Q 0.0»___ .00 --104
4250 SIGNSSSTRIPING MATERIALS .00 69500.00 .00 6.500.0; .�
*•*+4 SUPPLIIS__R_REPAI.8 2.2 5-36_ fb2'Ago on 2-:175-36 606 b24�ba 1 4
4310 LEGAL SERVICES 14335,67 25,i000�04 1.335.67 i'366q�3 °S,1}
1---.4311 AUDIT-_&__Fl-k.._.SERVICEB_-- _� 6,4.00,Od___ -0---
4312 ENGINEERING SERVICES .00 7.000400 .00 79000409 .;
4313 EDP DESIGN L SOFTWARE .00 400 .QO 400
F431.4 PJ.ANNING 000 -- g;� II-------F-DI a'_ata.t0�----4-
I 4315 OTHER PROF, SERVICES 40.50 321130.00 dh„50 12.044.5; .3
L__ PRQFESSIQNAL.SEEi_VIL9--- - t.416�1L:� - __ _____7 8..53D;_ f..._ tfi,_Lt _.jj_.AA:Bi_s�+L-
4320 POSTAGE .00 3;198;00 .00 3�19a�0A ,q
4321_TELLMNE _ -A4.0n IA'&U-0; 30-00✓ !3.536. 40
�++** COMMUNICATIONS 34.00 164768.00 50.00 i64734.0; .!
4330 TRAVEL EXPENSE 477.15 7.090,00 477.15 6.612.85 A.7
--'4*••_-_IRAVEL--------- - - - -- -------- 471.1��--- -1.-0-40,0^ '`,' nZ2.75---6+61285--bra--
4350 LEGAL NOTICES PUt?LISHING on 8,470;0; .;n R';4yci;0n
1979 C I T Y OF SHAKOPEE _ E X P E N D-I T U R E R f P 0 R T _- _ __�S�E�i•�1:14______AGF___2
LFUND 01 GENERAL FUND C U R R E N T M 0 N. N Y E A R T O D A T E
ACCOUNT/DESCRIPTION_-_-_-�PP�QpR_LLl4II.tQt1___--�CS�lAL� VARIANCE._-_Pct aPP.BIlPRLtLIQ6t___ _ ICI.u1�L JCERSANClr_Pmt--
4351 PRINTING 9 REPRODUCTION .00 3,853,00 .00 3.853.00 ;n
****
PRINTING 6 RE PRODUCT 600 12; 2 .00 .00 12,3 3 Ob 06
L4361
4361 PROP, 6 BOILER INSURANCE .00 74746AOO .00 -7,,746,00 .0
4362 VEHICLE 6 EQUIP.INS. .00 13.025.00 .n0 13.025.On .0
***+► INSURANCE .06 33;TS a0 .00 3 239.00 e
4370 E4ECYRt.C21r i-i+Alis .e0 14fi6i.5,Qq-__ Q
4371 NATURAL GAS 9 HTG .00 t4,920,00 .00 t4,,920,00 t0
4372 WATER .00 1,605,00 no 1„6e5'OQ .A
4373 GARB.DISPOSAL/DUMP CHGS. .Q0 84,4839 roe .n0_m4.933tDo.._ -
4380 LAND RENTAL .00 16400%00 .AO 1,4004OO .A
4361 BUILDING RENTAL .00 %00 .00 - X00
L4382 MACHINERY REN1A�-_�-_-_-- ,00 3.01.04;dO �QD 1 1
ullOQ__
4383 OFFICE EQUIPMENT RENTAL .00 5„000100 .00 5,,900%09 .0
4384 EDP EQUIPMENT RENTAL .00 19,200.00 .00 t9420o.0e .e y
a
**** UTIL�TIE9 RENTALS AO r 1S0,S19.40 '.e0 i50.S79.0a .0
[___4390 CONFERENCES_!_$CNQ0_0_.. _._�_
�Q9y50 _� 11ai�Q�CQ- 394..50_-_1d;Tq�fl-3.x.6__._ °
4391 OUEB 6 BUHSCRIPTIONS 100000 5.350,00 100.00 5021;0%on I.o
4392 LICENSES 6.00 305,00 6.00 299,0() P.m
4393 AWARDS_6 INDEMNI_T-IEO .00 R +0.0 _:00
[_4394 BOOKS L PAMPHLETS - 11rA00 'T 1.b00 00 12.00 1.58000 ,4
4396 MEETING EXPENSE 7,00 620.00 7.00 613.00 1.1
**** CONF,SCHOOLS,BOOKS 524.50 19,065.00 - 524.50 t8.540.5n- P.
4410 JANITORIAL SERVICES -_ 1,129.46 _ _ -11,6LO�QQ t.t29..g6 tO..45A i_v,j__�„
4411 CURRENT USE CHARGES „00 850,00 .00 650,�R ,0
4125 BLOOD TESTS •00 330.00 600 330.00 .A
**** PRISON BOARD RJANIT0 1.129.46 - 12.790.00 14129.46 11.660.54 4.A
4509 CAPITAL-_OTHER .00 _ L- VEHICLES 0
Q CAPITA!. - - 3.00Q,�.Q --��----i3�d�Q�OQ__,_.�-..,
00 25t6000o .00 25,16001%06 '01 6
4511 CAPITAL•EGUIPMENT •00 S1A358..00 .00 5143S8,00 to
4512_CAPITAI.�OFFI-CE EA�IIPMEN.T _.----__. -.-_.._--- -.4.4 -. B�LIS40.0
4519 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS .0e - 26,300.00 .00 26.300.00 .A
CAPITAL-6 IMPROVMNTS_ - _j� _ t?4-,�43.-09 - -00�12N.493.00--�Q-__._
4710 PERMANENT TRANSFERS .00 27.'800,06 .00 27;800ZOQ �Q
_g940._MERCHANDISE_FOR_R_"ALE__-..-------- --.--------- �QO ..+_..._._._._._._ ____L65-0...00-__..-------►00-----1-�6SQ�00___ ,d_---.
4950 INVALID OBJECT .00 '00 .00 On
4980 REFUNDS .00 6-50,00 .e0 650%OA �e
4981 SALES TAX _--
_�.6D_O0 tIlO_ -_--.IlIl- '60.0-'00
1
4990 MISCELLANEOUS ,OA 8000 .00 I'An0'o0 .e
4991 CONTINGENCY .Oe 116.000.06 .00 1180000.00 .0
h-
L--j
1979 CIT—OF_VAKME_ — F Y P F N Q [T () _—E A E P n R t A3 Df �•t�•Z4___— —PALE ; __
FUND 01 GENERAL FUND C U R R E N T M d N t N V E A R T O D A T E
__ACCOUNT/DESr-RIPTION._ ___...._ AL vAhlikeE PCt APPap PC--
i
1504500- n .00 190-goo l--
--FUND---i0TAL3-
a
C '
9
ar. >
a
_
*'
1979 CITY OF S H AxUPLE -_
� puwo 01 aLmsnxL ruwo c V x n s w Y M n w / * _ v u w ° . " v o ^ E
| ^ccouw//oeucwIP r/uw _ _ _- �ymU ^� _ _ ���,u��� �?
_ _____ - � --� -_ _
3011 GEN. LEVY coxnEwr .on *0*95n2.00 7,620.63 ooI,gyl.ur~
1.9
�o�a
|'-- oP�LEyv ~ JUUCEMLwmS - ----'-------------------------- 110180.00
--_ . '-� --- -- . ` o~n --------- 11,19 0.00- .,o n»
lois p, Uvf � kxf4IN� 0w � 31�19a^n lo 6A .6
3016 SHADE /neE DISEASE °n 269069^o0 ,00 w,06v°uw
3017 INC. 1mn, » COMM. oE«~ Dn *~� �.q� _x -
_
ioa ui. pxptoY, ikxto 00,00 .00 10"00O.o*~ .0
|�
3021 PENALTIES o Im/Ex*n7 .on ,00 ,mo .n«
"^^°' �����- - ----- -'--- ---------- -- ----_� -.00------'---' 2°00 7,620"61 512,771.37~ 1.�
i
3111 LIuuon LlcEwaso 25.00
- ' -'--- -------- g ---------------------- ,u�oyn.mnQ�-------- ��»�» �^"*31i* *Etx Licc"oEo X_- J
-
3113 oxmnu LIccwoso 100°00 400.00 900000 100.00~ 75.0
3114 ���xxc/,�
|' - �lcEmoea ' - --------'----------''-----------' _--'------'-- �20.V
-- �-- _-_-4190» s�
3115 wIoc. 000z*EoS Llc0__0 ----- "on- - 6�o,uv - .0n w5o°Vn~
3130 uno LlcEwScu 180600 700,00 200^00 500~06~ am""*
3151 pouL TABLE L\temocS 60(1"0V' - 5N,o q^gnn'
�
1
3132 boILuiwG PLOmi/S 2.177.50 269000.00 3.Dsu~60 ?2,646~00~ xp.9
3133 PLon*Iws pcnwI/n 444.50 91000"00 791,50 8"208,So~ w.9
313* wc:*xmICxL pEpMlr§L �9 "00 1500"00 �u3"?54^§16�25�-��^�_
3135 WELL PERMITS '--- ' ----- '------------- ou~Vn-----'--�'-----��----------,7sn"oo'----- '61^00 6A9.00~ 8.1 �
3136 mcwsw u W^/sn psnwx7o 130^00 700.00 xsn"on 590,00~ 21^4 |~
| 3137 EiLrTnI C-AL.pE*m%}P ��0^50 3"$VO.O�__ �5S~�U-_-___'D��Q5^00.`'��^�__-_'|
3138 o,x*E` opc�Iwo peR�if§ --- too 250.00 40,00 206.00~ Xv,m �
3139 MISC. wnw~muo, PERMITS .on 25.00 "oV 25,00~ .w �
»t*o UTILITY-INu"'-pEn��l�L- - - --_ _ _-- - ^0
°^*°-LIcewpso u pammIYS *92349 25
n�,�r�,uo Y,3*�.nn rp,o���oo~ m.� | �
|/ -`- --- - -------------- ------------' ----------'---------- -- ' - - ------'- -------''--- ---- -�- ~
3310 Fcoc*^i-Gnxw/n e80.87 14,318.00 I,s91.48 i2"776,Sp~ 11.1
3320 om,E Gwxw/o ^vo ?s.mna.00 10^128,00 15,70*.00~ 3q.p
3330 LOCAL GOVT. AID "Vo--_-__� �1o^»�a.vo__-__�__-__-�.V0____- 1o"8�� "?__'
u31 m/^L*Lo *Acn^ i��- .Oo 904000000 .00 30"000.00~ .»
{ assa um/s *wv.m^xmr, All) too 14,05.00 7,747.sn 6,277.90~ S;.p |
| 3334 puLIcc ol^/s AID _ _ ,00 _ _- _ -_ _. _ Z397Vo"oo
3340 COUNTY xuxo u unInG"t xih .no so,000,00 .on nw,o»o.o«~ .»
3360 opuc pYM,.Iw LIEU up mo, 20,032.00 240,394.00 400«64.00 aoo^spn.o«~ x*./
GRAN7S kiDS'--' --' -- -' -- - -----' 2001207 - -' -- -' --' - - 692,355.00 --S9.5300qm ----632$8p-4.'o?-- 14.6 -
|
| oym cwo, Go^oc FEE __._ _ __ __ 2o,V0� _ __ _'_ __ -- __' 840"00 -3V^0V_-__�' ��1V^Oq~� 1�.� '
3511 PLAN c*cLx �tc - 7�9.�5 «,5oo.00 1^469,so 3^011.50- 37.*
3512 ^nxcau*cw/ nmxc*Ea 3.00 150,00 13.00 137.00~ m.r
3513 SALE OF *»puL -5V.Vo_- _ -� - __- -_-' -*o«^Vo_-_ o�"o ��v^9��_��"n-_'-
351" pLma-xEzow~x�*~�hWh�UuE - '-- - - --oo1,on 4,000.00 531.00 3,469.00~ 13.9
'
3515 ou^vLv c*ccx FEE 24.00 2*0^00 30.00 �1o.Vo~ 1o.9 |
| 3511 MISC. pnupsn/v nemixLm _ _ 250,00 _ _ 4.290"00 V0.oVL _3 .?�V.«n~ 11.w. �
3bla SpELi nEpmo 910.e5 e1500.00 Q10.2* x"SnvJ 36."
3520 awuW »Ewuv^L 1,175,00 600.00 1,175.00 s/s,00 xps,w
3521 pooL/c ruexs mEw/wLV _ .00 so.on - .»O - - _ S».«»~ °A
� ( ss?e ~eo cu//Iws cHx*oEo .00 so.ov ,nu 110.00- .»
� |
3523 mIoc.pn.~Ku.uLoxocn 21.56 soo.o^ 207.44~ 30.9 |
i ' - ----- - ---- -' -- ' ]
'
LLJ
1979 .cz/Y-of aH^wuPts - R-�-K� MLV-� 9 �-��l M_�-_'___ _--__ �� AS OF -__- -pu8F_'
| ruwu nl nEmLn^L pumn c u R e E w T w o m r w Y E A o r o n w T c |
| Accuuw//uEocmlpTlnw _ ESY"_HENENUE.-_-----xCTUaL____. VAR lANce-_'PCT___EOT.^'wE«smoE_--_-__&CJuxL.__-_-vARIxmmE -Pcr . ]
3ba4 SALE OF Ll/, p*opswrY ,vo .00 202,00 202.00
3530 xCLIu[N}_RLPunyS o� ---t5V.V055.o0- __.�_---�5.00.� 36.7-_
3*31 wIoc^ pnLfte ncnvlcEo "oo a50100 "»o 25V.00� .n
| ysua pouwn ^ELo u rIwsa .Vo m»v,00 19.00 ?nt"o»~ 2.4 |
| 3-333 IInL C«LLS_m. SJumnBY �FEES _-_--'_-_ -_--_-_-__��LVO _' �9.�nO^oV �_--__��"��0.0A_____�"��V.n0~ 3V.1L' ]
3534 FIRE. mowucn `ELo ,on 50.00 8.90 *1.50~ 17.0
uyoo uswnuw //cxs/m~punL .ov 179000.00 .nV tY"o»$.00~ .»
_ 3541 ^nnlySIu@S-puVL_ --- _----_--___--_ _.0 0 _'____-51090^0.0
'| � 85"�o0��t - JL
yy*a uwInmIws LEounw* "on 5,200,00 "on 5,200.011-3543 wxuc. puuL IwCumc "uV 800.00 "oo ^w o
-_ J 3*xo �oww�, �uunT r�w�o �m"oOo.00_- -__ �n � �9_ _?1n@w.51w_x4.9
|
3731 oxxoxst LOLL. L*wnupm 6,599.22 96,000.00 6,999,22 79,400�79~ r,r
3810 zm/cweoT .on 16,0*0.00 .»« t*,»»«.«»~ ^»
--3*20 cuwcEouIumS~pUwL - _---_ ____---_--__---__'_ _"00 -___.-3"woo�on_--_-__----_°�u-_-__-_�^*8u .�—O_ _
3624 muLL OF mxnuLIwE '� Sns°53 49600,00 8*3.93 3,171;6.47- Im,n
| 3830 PsxwxwcwT rwAworeno "oo . tSS9485100 .n* lms"oms,00~ ^o |
[ 3850 LowTmluu]jDwS uoOnwTIuw ----''_-- .00--__�__________________-S0$^om_- __---___�-.Uo-_____�_5oo��o�_ ,m_-_-J
3851 /moonrxv xGxecmcw/ ,00 .00 .00 ,n*
3872 ap.xuoEnm,~couwr, ,on .un ,vo .un
,_3873_UllEL0_eE1S_11PUSIT 'oo
3950 wsrownu w ncIMouxnsnEwTn 540"00 9_0'0 o-n^,oum u t-_,_2_3t'.,�ouY--__-__3_*-7_6_8^,9o�9_~ 24.6
3990 MIucLLL^weuoo IlI"m* soo^oV 187"89 312,11~ 37^*--_--
'|
;~
' - - ' _ ' _ - ___-_�--� --___-__.__-__---__� --' _----- - - ---- - -------- ---' --------'-- - -'--� ' �
*°^^ u,oE* xsvcwuEn 14,009.45 3n5,515.00 20^"50,06 364,5+4,94- 1.4 �
x
[---- ---FUND -TOTAL$ '�— --� --39--07 -- ��-
' | �
'
` - - ' - ' - - — - ---- - - '--� - - --' - -- --- ------'---------'
' -- - - - - - - -- -- -- --- ------'- --- ----- - '
_
� !
° \ !
1979 CITY OF SHAKUPLE E X P E N 1) 1 T U R E R F P 0 R T AS (IF ?-?8-79 PAGF I
F-
FUND 01 GENERAL FUND C U R R E N I M 0 N T H Y E A R T 0 0 A T E
ACCOUNT/UESCkIPTION APPROPRIATION ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT APPROPRIATION ACTUAL VARTANCF PC
0100 SALARIES-FULL TIME 48,591.34 703t304,00 73,214.89 630,OA9,11 10.4
4112 UVtRlIME-FULL TIME 2,087.32 6,380.00 2,417,13 39962.21 37.0
f aiAu SALARIES - PAR1 TIME 7078 4102 X4,168.00 9 _2 A 5.i4- 74.934.56 11.0
4140 PENA 3,633.35 5423900 5,266,44 48,97-0,56
4141 PENSIUNS-FICA 1,816,30 .-94-..
41142 PENSIONS-FIRE .00 10529,00 .00 1,529.00 on
4150 HEALTH & LIFE INSURANCE 1,782.12 i j 359185.00 2,637.51 32.547,49 7.5
4151 AUNKMENS CUMP.INSUNANCE 92,9
4i52 ONtmpLuYAW COMP. 302.98 1,000400 302,98 697,02 30.3
PERSUNAL SERVICES 99_1644.43_-. -11.6
4210 UFPILE SUPPLIES 534,14 49810.00 534,14 4,275.86 11.1
4220 6ENEHAL SUPPLILS U-9 U., 1-99-06643_5 4 4
1422 1 LHL�.ItAj.S 17300 3,300.00 171.10 3,126.70
4222 MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS 9,798,65 264180,00 9,798.65 18,381,35
4223 LLUTHING-PLRS,LQUIPMENT ----422.7.3.. Malt_
4224 SAFETY SUPPLIES 600 950,00 .00 950.00 .0
4225 SMALL IOUL PURCHASES 21,25 3,050.00 21,25 3,026.75 .7
4230 L(JUIP.MAINI. K REPAIR 1x098.01 1428TO49q 6 9
4231 bLU6*MAINt & REPAIR 259.68 25996$ 7.495.32 S.3
4e32 VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIR 783,55 19,800.00 761,155. 19,016.45 4.
4233 COMM, SYSTEM MAINT,_
4234 UTIL.-SYSTEM MAINT. 9 CUN. 100 51000.00 .00 51000.00 .0
4e40 ROAD MATERIALS 600 4,500.00 .00 41500.00 on
4241 PATCHING MATERIALS a 0 0 6,000.00
.0Q 6-1019 a
4e42 SEAL CUATING 00 22,000,00 :00 220000.00 .0
4243 GRUUNnS MAINT. MATERIALS 400 2*000*00 .00 2, 000o00 .0
i 4244 ICE CONTROL MATERIALS
%POO 2000.0
0250 SIGNS&STRiPiN_ G MAiERIiLi 600 69500.00 .00 6.500.00 .0
SUPPLIES & REPAIRS 14 t102.96 162
4310 LEGAL SERVICES 2,210.67 25,000,00 3,546.34 21*453,66 14,2
4311 AOUIT & FIN. SERVICES
4312 LNGINURING SERVICES 283.50 7*000.00 283.50 6,716.50 4.1
4313 EDP DESIGN & SOFTWARE .00 .00 .()0 .00
4314 PLANNING ..-#00 89000*9.0 __8t000*m0"____ on
1 143jS (AHLR 646.06 U,00.00 726.5�0 31,403.50 �.3
PRUFESSIONAL SLRVIES 3110 0117 -..-781530.00 73,913.66 9.8,
4320 PUSTAGE 315.00 31198.00 315.00 2,8S3.00 q.8
4321 TELEPHONE 1,029,14 13,570.00 1,,n.61.14 t2,506_,,86 7 9
_ _ _ _ _
COMMUNICATIONS 1,344,14 16,768.00 1 ,17A.14 15.3.9.81,
4330 TRAVEL ExPENSF 981.15 7,090.00 1 ,45A.lU 5.611.70 20.6
TRAVEL 98I.I5 7100.00 1 ,059.10 5,611.7m 2006
• 4350 LEGAL N0110ES 1,UtiL15Hlt,4G, 9CU,d5 8,470.00 9441.A5 7,575.15 11.2
~
t 11
1v7v �LIlv OF o*^*upsc -E-�� R-E -N D. 1_I-U-R '�-_'�i�L��/l �. I_' _�_-A�'nE__�r�a~7�_---- p»GE_- -�-_
/ ruwo ox GENERAL rowo c u p n s w T m n m Y * Y c « m Y O D N Y m |
! AccoumuosucwIprInw ApppupxlmIom - ^tTuxL _-_ AAM1AmCe--'P.tt_- xppnupxTxrION A-C-TwpL._ - v^nlxwcc -p V |
4351 pn/w/l*m o pEpnouoc/Iow 6+9,71 »^oss.00 669.71 3,r3,e9 17,*
^^^�-PR DOiN-fi-f 00iA66 uief - - -� ��--- --------------'---- --�� ��� --��^r�o,�m- xn"o-
�
4360 sEw, u Lt^13._Dx$w8ANCC
4361 peup. » BOILER IwounxwCs .on ' 70746"00 .00 7,7*6,0» ,n
436e vk*IcLE & Euo[p.Imo. ' "nn 13902S°00 too 13,0P5.00 on
-'-__'____--__-_ ---__________-_--_'
^^^^ /-moonxwcE 2o°$0 _ 33,1259000 � 20.0* ��*�n�°nw ^v
� o�/o ���cYx\c�7, 9.3 |
4371 m^/ux^L GAS m */o 2,669,76 149920,00 2,669,76 12,250.24 xr.y
4372 w*/en ,on 11605^00 ,on 19605.00 ."
4373 o^xu"oIVpn5xL/kV*pcMG3._ �,��V.��_-_�----___'__ "m��.VO__--__-�°�w�°§�____-2����m.�2-- r,o_
4380 Lxmo Rew/AL ^nn , 16*0*~00 ^uV 1^*Vn"mo "w
|
43e1 BUILDING nEmruL "$V ,uV ^Vu ^mw |
|
4302 ~«c*ImtnY *EwYxL °00___-__��X�u°o*--__,�_' |
4383 uppzcs suuIpwEw/ nEm/xL ,on 59900,00 ,ou 51900°00 ,w
osmo tup EouIpwEm, wswrxL too t9,200,00 ,vo 19,200,00 ,n
--__-rw_
^^w urlLirien 9 �cmLS lo°'933°0 1500579000 10,933,49 t99"mwS,Sv r,n �
| "
|
43*0 LuwFkwewLcyu oc*O0L* _-_---____-iX"��8.u� _-_-___���~1m_-_---�o°2r���� n.-_ | �
4391 uuLn o ouoacxIprIown 1,581,60 . 5,39o,on t,681,60 306*8040 31,* «
*392 LIccwnEn 44.50 � 305.00 50.90 2,54,50 16.6 n
4393 Aw^nua » INDEMNITIES-, '-_--__-_ --__-_-__-__-__ ---_--_-- 00_--_ o---
4394 mnoxn u pxmpmLEru m1091 1060$000 93"91 10506"09 q."i
|
43v6 MELT/w6 ExpcmnE 23*1* ' ' � � 620°00 30,7* swq°3o Is.o | �
Lowp,oc*uoLo,ounxn 2"2*7.39 1990*5.uo 2,771.89 16.2n3.1/ 14.5
4*10 J^*IlnxIxL oL»vICEu '_ - _ - _-_--'_--__--_-'�.V5�"��-_-`_---_-_-- �,mXu.0 s.62_____��^*�*
4411 LuvnL*, USE c*^nop* ^on 050.00 ^V$ 890°00 .»
|
4425 m�uoo /ca7u �m°oo �9w�oV ��^n� �»o,uo Y.9 |
�_____-
^^^^ poIoum ouxxn mxwI/u 1,082,16 12,790,00 P921t.62 10,578,38 17,3
osop �«pll��~ulxsx _ _ - -._ _ .o�_-_ ��"vVu.V0- _- . _.��_'__.-13^Ooo.u0 _ .O __
| ' ' ' '- �� - - - -- --- ----- -' ----
4510 cApzlxL ~ vEwIcLLn ,00 6,600^00 .on 60600.o» .o
|
4511 Lupx/oL~LuuIpnew/ 25e.60 5105e.00 25n^6a SI.uwv.00 .1i \
| 4512 cAp/IuL~op�ILc cuoIpMFwT - - _ �3o.�o _ - _-_- _84 1 IR5~00 _ -_ --13n.9 w--____u^0 4 6.0 6- _1.7- !
obxv u,ncx Im^xuvEMEw/o ,00 260300.00 ,00 n6,300,04 .v
^^°° mpIl»L « Impn-U»wm/m --- _ _- ��7"�* _---__ 105,943"00- --_ -1 P .4-__-
!
|
4710 pcxw^wEw/ /nxwurEno "Vo 27,800000 ,00 27.800"00 .* |
. o*ov MexCm^*nIoE FOR opS^Ls "nO_ -_ - - - _ _ 19690.00 - --- .Vo - 10690.00- _.o -_J
ovso Iwv^LIu uoJEL, .00 ^vo ^ov ^oo
*vmo oeowoo .on 650.00 .no 65,0.0» .^
4»01 SALES }«w .on 600,00 .00 608.00-- _ .o -_
4990 MIu:LLmmsuuo 65.52 l,noo,00 os.5e 1,734.49 3 0 fo
w |
4991 cnw`/w6c:cv ,no 7*,855.00 ,00 74,8-15.00 ,n |
1979 CITY OF SHAKUPEE - _ E X P E_N D I _T U R E,R E P n R T �— T V AS OF 2-?8^7Q —_PAGF 3 _
I FUND O1 GENERAL EUNU C U R R E N T M 0 N T H Y E A R T n D A t E
ACCOUNT/UESCHIPTIUN APPROPRIATION ACTUAL VARIANCE__ PCT APPROPRTATION_ __-...VARIANCE PCT
**** OTHER EXPENDITURES 65,5E _-1.07355._00 65.152 _101.2A9L4A__
FUND TOTALS t�J9i,5y3 5t 1 65q 663 0,0� 171 08 A83 577 �23 __in 3
j
0
1
L Ll
fJ
i
1979 LIIY OF_ SHAKUPEE__. - - - - -- -- - ------CHECK NEGISTLR_.._.._—..-_. - -- - -- - - - 03_2U 70 PAGE if
CHICK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. N -ESSAGF
074214 03/15/79 7.50 HFNNEN-S SKELLY EWUIP. MAINT, 01.4230-621-h2
19.50 •
:...., ***•CKS
I
014230 03/15/79 --333640 __._._ _ _....HA.YDEN-M-U-RPHY_.-E9UZP._.-_-GEN._BUPP.LIEg.___ _-___-__01!9220-421-42.. 86454.
333.40
I) 074,133 03/15/79 24.95 HOUSE OF PRINT OFF„ SUPPLIES 01.4210-311-31 3057
014233 0.3/15/79 _._ 900 __..___HQUSE_QE_.PRIML._-----_OFF._SUE'?LIES_.____-.__ 1._4,2 -021_-._32.31.34-
014,133 03/15/79 15.15 HOUSE OF PRINT PRINTING 01.4350.121.12 3127
49.10
014 35 03/15/79 3.118.._ .-__.H RMDNEJi WE UPTL1F. -L-4.220.-.6 22-62-iIl522
3.08
---"-**-CKS--
014231 03/15/79 13.85 LEROY HOUSER Misc. 01-4900-141.14 152270
...... ***-CKS
014239 03/15/79 261.81 "ALTER C. HARBECK CONFERENCE 01-4390.111.11
U,4e4u 03/15/79 99.50 HUUSON MAP CU. GtN SUPPLIES 01-4220-311-31 8759
99.50
*.**.► ***.CKS
074250 03/15/79 2,85-2..00 _ _ __._ _ISBEItG_ RIE9EN6EfiG__.-_ -__�' _A.N.N.ING�_:..� ______ ____01 .4.3.1p .1.7_L•.17 919.. _ _. __-_____ _. __
2.857.00
074251 _--.- 03/15/.79__-_- Di'!139L-12.L-_1Z4QQ_54-
105.00
. 074251 03/15/79_. - 33.1 ._..__. -._--INTL.a_-HARVE$.l.E.R_. .__.�- ---_ _EWUIP.MAINTI._..--- ___-__QJ!423�•?�2L-.b2_S�T11_.-_-
.._. ._ 33.14 * ------ --
0742e4 03/15/79 624.00 G.F. JUERGENS CONST, BLOG.8 MAINT, 01-4231-311.31
624.00. +►_ ._
.,+*.. ***.CKS
6 070291 03/15/79 1.015.50 KRASS a MANAHAN LtrAL SERVICES 01.4310-161.16
• 074291 03/15/79 410.00 KRASS & MANAHAN LEGAL StRVICES 01-4310-163-16
014291 03/15/79 290.00 KRASS k MANAHAN LEGAL SLPVICF9 01-431D-165.16 ..._.__. ._._.._ _.__. _
1979 LITY OF SHAKUPtE LHECK REGISTER
- -- 03 70 79 PAGF 5
LHECK F40. UATE AMOUNT VMUR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NU, INV. M P.O. 0 MESSAGE
Ulu2 01 03/15/79 3U.U0 KRA33 B M4NAHAN LEGAL SERVICES 52-4310-911—ol
1.745.50
I O1u292 03/15/7Y 24.60 KOEHNEN-S STANDARD MOTOR FUELS O1 4227 Zit-31
074242 03/15/79 24.38 KOEHNEN-S STANDARD VEHICLE MAINT, 01:4232:311:31
48.98
*R*-CK$
0743OU 03/15/79_ 121.90 — - -KOKESH ATHLETIC SUP. —-- 6EN.SUPPLIEB
121.80 * I
— ***-LKS .
074315 03/15/79 1,175.84 LOGIS EDP E9UIP..RENTd_--, 01-4384-_151-15 1143
- l#*****
0743x7 03/15/79 5,99 LANG IMPLEMENT VEHICLE MAINT, 01-4732-421-42 106825
##t#** ***-CKS
474329 03/15/79 5.92 RUSSELL LAWRENCE SCHOOL 01-4390-311-31 a
5.92
#****t ***.CKS
i
074342 03/15/79 _ _ 80.64 R$ --. ---- ._._YEHICLE .MAINT._ 41-MR-=11+
014342 03/15/79 53,39 MALKERSON MOTORS VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-421-42
134.03
C 3 -
074349 03/15/79 $38.00 MOBIL OIL__-- - MUTUR FUELS _.._ .._ 01-4222-921-92. 37T?-Q6__ .__ __ _._--
AP,UO * --
i
074351 03/15/79 6.43 MOTOR PARTS GEN.SUPPI.IES 01-4220-421-42
Oi4351 03/15/79_ 29.27 MOTOR PARTS MUTUR FUFL4
074351 n3/15/74 600.43 MOTOR PARTS — VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-311-31
01431 n3/15/79 46.22 MOTOR PORTS VEHICLF MAINT. 01-4232-421-42
074351 03/15/7.9 34.67 _ _ MOTOR PAkTS- _ .__ _ .-__ - VEHICLE MAINT.
710.02
074352 03/15/79 296.36 MINNEGASLO _ HIG. STATEMENT
074352 ()3/15/79 121.88 MINNEGASLO HIG. STATEME?,'T 01-4371-182-18
074352 03/15/79 537.43 MINNECASLO H1G. STATEMENT 01-4371-311-31
074352 03/15/79 673.70 MINNEGASCO Hire STATEMENT 01-4371-321-32
• I074352 03/15/79 1,074.85 MINNEGASLO HIG. STATEMENT 01-4371-421-42
074352 03/15/79 189.11 MINNEGASLO HIG. STATEMENT 01-4371-627-62
074352 03/15/79 174.94 MINNEGAALO HIG. STATEMENT 01-4371-4.39-62.
1979 LIIYUh -SHAK.UPLE F 6 ----
1 F 19 _P�A G —-
LHLCK NO. UAIE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO, INV, 0 P.O. 4 MESSAGE
3,074.,'7
F
074386 03/15/79 25.02 NW HELL PHONE RILL ni-4321-ilt-11
074386 03/j5/79 PILL.-_ _ ___ - - __ ____ ____J
07439t, 03/15/79 50.04 NW BELL PhnNE BILL 01-4321-141-14
07438b 03/15/79 83.54 NW BELL PHONE SILL 01-4321-151-I5
074386 _ 03/I5/79 N W JIE L L_ PHONE 0 1 r 4 3 2 Lml 8 2!--1
074386 03/15/79 . 42.03 NW BELL PHONE BILL 01-4321-321-32
014386 074386 _63/15/79 211,01 NW SELL PHONE BILL 01-4321-311-31
03/IS/79
01438b 03/15/79 8.50 NW BELL PHONE RILL 01-4321-351-35
07438#3 03/I5/79 121l01 NW BELL PHONE BILL 01-4321-411-41
074386 ____Ph0Nl__8ILL ______0I_-!!_1d2I-421,42
13/15 t7 9 e-0
07438b 03/15/79 25.02 NW BELL PHONE SILL 15-4321-191-19
960,65
014387 03/15/79 58.52 NW SERV. ST. EQUIP* EWUIP.MAINT. 01-4230-311-31
074387 03/15/79 58.52 NW SERV. ST. EUUIP, EwUIP,mAINT. 01-423n-021-02 0369
074412 03/15/79 2q2.22 PITNEY BOWES nFF.FQUIP.PENTAL 01-4383-121-12 InO977
292.22
0744Ub 03/15/79 st"A 0 -_REYNOLDS.. KLDIAG_..... -4?2 0-4 21-�_A
***.Cgs
0.1
0144ab 03/15/79 33.25 REYNOLUS WELDING GLN.SUPPLIFS 01-4220-041-44
90.55
***-Cxs
0 7-li-a 5 1- 03-/15/7-9 301.7-1--------REDFIELD -ELE-OH.K. EU-UIPMA-INT.
301.71
074462 03/19/79 19.20 RICH/LYNN cnRP. OLN.SUPPLIES 11-4220-121-12 6719b
***-Cgs
03/15/79 7.50 RING FIRE EXTG, AL6G_.541-Wi. 01-4231-182-18 42
1.50
***-CKS
0144161 03/15/79 17.00 RIE1 CHAkLES sUnKS 01-4394-321-12
11.(10
•
***-CK3
1979 CITY OF bHAKUPEE _-CHECK REGISTER 03 20 79 PA6F 7
CHECK NO, DATE AMOUNT VENT)UR ITEM DESCRTPTION ACCOUNT NO. TNV, N P.O. 0 MESSfiGF
674471 63h5/79
074477 03/15/79 5.77 SUEL BUSINESS OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-141-t4
074,471 03/15/79 74.40 SUEL BUSINESS OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-421:0-31-1-31
SUPPLIES oI 49io';0i
01: _ -41
074 0 4210
7 03/15/79 10.50 SUEL BUSINESS OFFICE SUPPLIES 421-42
074477 01/15/79 25600 SUEL BUSINESS_____. EWUIP.MAINT._.
074477 0 12.95 SUEL BLI3INESS 01-4230-311.31
074477 03/15/79 123.75 SUEL BUSINESS CAP-nFF.EQUIP. 01-4512-311-31
074478 03/15/79 8,56 SHAKOPEE LUMBER GLN,SUPPLIES 01-4220-622-62
014478 03/15/79.1--. 70.,80_ t I IP a.M A
79.36
074479 03/15/79 411,63 SHAK E VALLEY PUB, LLGAL_-NOT PUB. 0 -4350-1211 12_
074479 SHAKOPEE VALLEY PUB. LEGAL NOT PUB. 55-4350-911-91
***-CKS
074484 03/15/79 STARK,-9__SLL4_NtNG F%LDG_,_
074484 03/15/79 16,40 STARK-$ CLEANING BLDG. MAINT. 01-4231 182-18
074484 03/15/79 17.00 STARK-S CLEANING BLDG. MAINT. 01-4231-311-31
07448S 03/15/79 66.45 SPUC PUSTAGF 01-4320-141-14
074495 03/15/79 33 43-- SPUC FLEC,STATEMENJ __01-4V71
u 03/15/74 i ilk --
07405 03/15/79 44�s i�
�4 SPUC FLEC.STATEMENT 01-4370-182-18 ttII
074485 03/IS/79 191,87 spuc FLEC.STATEMENT 01-4370-311-31
SPUC -------ELFC-$TATFmENT
0744Hb 03/15/79 383,73 SPUC ELFC.STATEMENT 01-4370-421-42
014485 0-S/15/79 258.36 SPUC FLEC,STATEMENT 01-4370-427-02
0744145 03/15/79 i!Io-68 SPUC ELEC.-STATEmENT___01--4370-622-42
674465 -71.89 sok FLEC.STATEMENT 01-4370-625 62
074485 03/I5/79 63.67 SPUC ELEC,STATEPAENT 01-4370-628-62
074485 03/15/79' 146,40 ___._FLFC.STATEMEN
0448t) OS/15/79 146.40 SPUC ELEC. STATEMENT 01-7370-639-A2
074485 03/15/79 146.40- SPUC ELEC. STATEMENT 01-7370-639-62
2,0A3.02
RRRRRR ***-Cxs
074486 03/15/79 1.03b.00 SU811RBAN ENG. F14G. SEkVICES 01-4312-41t-41 796q77
1,03b.00
074469 8.72 SUPERAMFRILA GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-311-31
074489 03/15/79 134,99 SUPERAMFRTCA MUTUR FUELS 01-4222-311-31 716
143.71 *
074490 03/15/79 13.00 ST. FRANCIS HnsplTAL BLOOD TESTS 01-4429-311-31
- 13,00 *
***-Cl(s
0744Q1 03/15/79 b.08 SflAKoPEF HI)WE. rL11I.SUPPL IF S
�
'
uLJ
1979_LlTypp SxxxuPEs _ _ _,_-CHECK nFsI8rE*- 03-2 u_7 n ' r^op «
{ c*uc^ NO o"/s wmuwwY vEmmOn fTfm uFSCmxPTInm xCcouNY wV" Iwv, w P.O,. w mEnSxmr |
| 0_3__/_1s_/i9___
o,"*�� n �sv,p 8.52 SxunopEE *DwE, nEm,00ppLIES 01-4220~4*1~44
ow"ve 03/xs/79 2s,93 omuxopEE oowE. nLnc, wAzwr^ 01-4231~62p~62
,- 3_�-_-___-___-_-_-_'___'_-_--'� __-__- � - - ----� � �------------
°°^-c«» |
074499--- 03i15/79- - a.50 � ucorrC?v,,nE«m. mImc" 01~4990~151~lS
2.50 ^ '
- -_ - _'_ _0_ _ _ ____-_'__-____ -_----_--___--__
^�*~��u
| o7*so� _ ^/xs/7v ' - - I
3.89 *
- 07450b.----- 03/lS/79_--
21,14 *
07*513 03/15/79 2.00 ncorY Crv, nEconoEn MISC. 01~4n90~121~12
-0141513V.S/15179 _---__�^Vn 1~onvn.1a1-1e _�� �_-_'-_-___- '
3.«» ^ | :
| | ~
**w~cu�_-_| �
�
014521 03/15/79 *,34 wOw^Ln oCmEeen nLxoOL 01~439»-311-11 �
� *.3* * _
|
014522 0*15/79 7.50 oop,or nuc.ocpl.31 ouoxm 01~41*4~81~12 | `
| 7.50 ° � _ _ _--� _ _ ' -- ___ _ � _ ��--_� _ -_ _______-' -_--- __|
074523 03/15/79 14.50 ocurr cT,.nvevc,un cEw,nuppUFo 01~4,20~141~t4
14,51 ^ ___ ____ __ _______ _ __ __ - _ _ ___ - - - -- --
**m~Cxm |
' | _ __� -�- - _ _ __- _ � - -___��- ___� '`.]
o/*�^� o�/�s/7p 100,35 u*IrunMu owLIwl7cn nLw,sunpLIry n/-0000~u11~11 116?36
100.35 °
���
� |
| ow5oo _ 03/15/79 _t�^5o - uw��w /� - v�Mlc�[��orm�. . _'-o�.w�����1�~�1_9^V0-- -�
17.50 °
^u
|
07�'357 03/15/7* aa,on vTxImn lw». cEwTcn oc*uoLImn nt~4390~321~32 1?3013 |
***~cxu ~/
074563 03/15/79 109.�l VISIBLE cnwp, noppLv uLw,suppL/rn nl-4z2«~151~`s 459560-- -- --- �
~ � 109.51 ^ | w
_____ __ __ _____- ---
o/o56* oy15//9 l,i^ ueEnG vux/Awo pLo�, u^/*T. oi-"zs�~1o1~1m
1979 L IV Ut SHAKUPEF LHECK RE6TSTER - _ _ --^ - - -- 03 701!-PAGF Q
i
(,HECK wu, unit AMOUNT VENDOR IIEM DESCNIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. N P.O. k NESSAGF
074564 u3/15/79 12.30 GREGG VTIXLANU TRAVEL EXPENSE 01-4330-151-15
13.64 #
j 074572 03/15/79 - _ 93.57 _WILLI-AMS HUWE. GLM.SUPPLIE9___
93.57 • --
074573 03/15/79 57.00 WEST PUB. yunKS 01-4394-121-12
014574 03/15/79 130.00 UNIV,_OF WISCONSIN _ SGHOOL_,
--
###.##
*- KS
I 074577 03/15/79 18.15 WOUDLAKE SANITATION TRASH PICK UP 01-4313-181-18 1
074577 03/15/79 3.02 ._ WOUDLAKE $ANITATI.ON -- TRASH PICK. UP --__,__-_ 01-0373-182-_18 J
-. -. - -- - - -- -- - - ---- ----- -
014571 n3/15/79 26.98 wOUDLAKE 3AwjTATION TRASH PICK UP 01-4373-311-31
074577 03/15/79 15.13 WOUDLAKE SANITATION TRASH PICK UP 01-4373-321-32
074577 03/15/79 - _ 26,_88 - _—W000LAKE_SAN;TATION TRASH PICK UP _0L-4373-a2.1-42
074577- 03/15/7v ?6.e9 w000LAKE ii6I TATION TRASH PICK UP 01-4373-622-62 - — — -
U14S77 03/15/79 69838.64 WOODLAKE SANITATION TRASH PICK UP 01-4373-711-71#RR### _
*w#.CK$ ..
--73- - . '- 0144230-421-4 - -- - -�
13.00 •
##AR#R
***-CKS FUND 01 TOTAL
- ---121_.80 FUND 13 _TOTAL _ - --
25,02 FUND 19 TOTAL - - ---
30.00 FUND 52 TOTAL
- -
141,.20_ _ . FUND-.SS iTAL - - _._-. ------_
39751.b4 FUNS Al TOTAL
49•2A3.48- -- - TOTAL-- ---- --- --
• 1
I
DEBIT ACCOUNT CREDIT ACCC)UN !. AMO('Nf BA1 li
REMARKS VFti'UUR CE(E'(:K r�.M'
-_-_ __
March 20, 1979 Handwritten Bills
01 .4390.311 .31 01 . 1010.000.00 172 . 56 School Americana Ventures 172 . 56
01 .4220 . 141 . 14 it it 13 . 29 Gen. Supplies Albinson 13 . 29
01 .4390 .311 .31 to it 85 .00 School ATOM 85 .00
01 .4220 . 321 .32 to it 34. 79 Gen. Supplies Advance Ambulance 34. 79
01 .4232 .421 .42 it " 316. 38 Vehicle Maint. Barco Bearing 316 .38
01 .4230 .421 .42 to " 20 . 50 Equip .Maint . Martin Bush Iron 20. 50
01 .4232 .421 . 42 " 14. 95 Vehicle Mair_t . W.L. Petrica 14 . 95
01 .4394. 141 . 14 " " 32 .00 Books Quality Services , Inc .32 .00
01 .4315 . 331 .33 " " 2 , 148 .00 Prof. Services Wiggin Realty 2 , 148 .00
01 .4220.321 . 32 " " _ 7 .02 Gen . Supplies Weber & Troseth 7 .02
2 , 759 .49 2 , 759 .49
Fund 01 2 , 759 .49
4
MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Projected General Fund Budget
DATE: March 29, 1979
Attached is a projected 3 year General Fund Budget. Due to uncertainties
in several areas, it should be taken in the context of the trends it por-
trays. The obvious conclusion, based on assumptions used in developing
the data, is that expenditures are increasing faster than revenues and
the City Council will have to make appropriations on a priority basis for
1981.
There are some steps that can be taken to ease the situation for the op-
erating side of the budget. Several sources of revenue can be used for
operating purposes but are not included in the projections. The largest
of these sources are Revenue Sharing, Industry Agreement and additional
payments by SPUC under the new agreement. According to the Capital Items
Budget - Summary dated 8-15-78, the level of these sources is as follows:
1979 1980 1981 1982
Industry Agreement $ 100,000 100,000 - -
Revenue Sharing 94,351 85,000 85,000 85,000
SPUC - 15,000 35,000 55,000
$ 194,351 200,000 120,000 140,000
There are planned capital expenditures associated with these revenues.
These also have to be dispersed in priority.
GMV/klk
A.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Projected Budget - General Fund
1979 1980 1981 1982
Revenue:
Levy Limit Base 762,050 925,000 1,004,560 1,100,790
Ind. & Comm. Dev. 32,369 30,000 30,000 30,000
Del. Tax 10,000 14,000 16,000 18,000
Licenses & Permits 86,375 92,000 98,000 103,000
Intergovernmental:
Federal 14,318 10,000 10,000 10,000
State 119,626 124,000 128,000 131,000
Other 274,384 280,000 282,000 284,000
User Charges 145,430 148,000 150,000 152,000
Fines & Forfeits 28,000 29,000 30,000 31,000
Other 212,085 115,000 116,000 117,000
TOTAL REVENUE $1,684,637 $1,767,000 $1,864,560 $1,976,790
Expenditures:
Personal Services 965,063 1,032,617 1,104,900 1,182,243
Supplies 163,350 181,100 200,200 220,000
Travel & Conferences 26,155 28.000 29,000 30,000
Insurance 35,174 38,000 40,000 42,000
Utilities & Communications 195,850 213,500 232,700 253,600
Prof. Services , 80,555 80,000 80,000 80,000
Transfers (Jt. Rec. ) 27,800 30,000 32,000 34,000
Other 78,635 90,000 90,000 100,000
New Personnel - 52,000 99,840 126,000
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES 1,572,582 1,745,217 1,908,640 2,067,843
Capital 136,643
Total Expenditures $1,709,225
GMV/klk
RAHR MALTING CO. �& I
SINCE 1847
GENERAL OFFICES,567 GRAIN EXCHANGE,MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55415,PHONE 612/335-6874
Charles K.Allendorf,Executive Vice President-Operations
March 19 , 1979
Shakopee City Council
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Gentlemen
The Rahr Malting Co. is contemplating the expansion of its malting facilities
in Shakopee. At a public hearing of the Planning Commission held March 15 ,
1979 , to hear the Company's request for a height variance a question arose
regarding the potential effect on the water table of the increased production
capacity.
Process water for the plant operation is currently supplied from deep wells
drilled to the Jordon Vein located on Company property. The malting process
can be characterized as a natural germination process where barley is steeped
in water to bring its moisture content to a level where germination will begin.
Once germination has begun, periodic applications of water are made to maintain
vigorous growth and then finally, when the desired growth has been achieved,
excess moisture is removed through kilning to stop the germination process.
Recognizing the necessity for the conservation of water the Company has been
experimenting with new technology in which the barley moisture is increased
through the use of a spray system rather than using total immersion. Testing
has shown this system to produce results equal to the immersion system with
a resultant reduction in process water requirements of approximately 30%. The
Company is now in the process of converting all of its existing facilities to
this technology.
The plans for the proposed expansion will also incorporate this technology with
he result that when the added capacity becomes operational the total water
usage will be no greater than current demand and the net impact of the total
facility on the water table will be unchanged.
Sincerely
C . K. Allendorf
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA • SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
41.0
}
- k 4 3
3 � 4
IT' S TINE TO THINK SPRING ! !
WF%0%0%0%0%0%0----------- ---------
� n
85th Year of Publication Gibbon, Sibley County, Minnesota 55335 Thursday, Feb. 22, 1979 No. 52
WINTER 'S FIRST BLIZZARD IMMOBILIZES AREA Associated'Press
Cincinnati streets under water
Cincinnati policemen checked a truck that was abandoned in flood
waters in the eastern section of the city. Some streets were Under 5
The first real storm of this Cars were stranded every- were well below the zero During the day. Saturday, another inch of snow fell. feet of water Friday after the Ohio River ran over its banks.A 100-mile
winter season immobilized wh @re. Seven foot drifts in mark and with the low wind the mercury climbed to just Monday we experienced stretch of U.S. Hwy. 52, from Cincinnati southeast to Portsmouth,
this whole area last week some areas were not uncom- chill, this was probably a above zero, but generally ` j Ty U F YH A K0 pt-:RR. G. J. GERMANN
more drifting and even some
Thursday, February 15. mon. record low setting night. hovered around zero until 1
schools were closed again. OPTOMETRIST
M ��'(, 1, A N 18'/z North Minnesota Street
V 1 S
Although only several inch- On Saturday areas leading Friday morning the mercury Sunday when it climbed As of Monday, February 19, L 0 slightly and then dropped we had 58 days of con- �- NEW ULM, MINNESOTA 56073
es of snow fell, it brought out of Gibbon, including as at minus 18 degrees at „ �
$ back to the zero mark. secutive below-freezing �� b( �r E �'1 y MAR 6 1979
with it conditions that were TH 19, still had spots where 8:00 a.m.. The sun shone [
P During the night Saturday weather. The record is 62
inconvenient and dangerous. brightly, but it proved to be /�j �
there was only one lane of and early Sunday morning days.
v
Winds gusting from 40 to 60 traffic. Judging by Highway a bitter cold day in spite - y
miles per hour blocked roads the sun. It was twenty be- - �c•�'�
5 from Minneapolis, Win- y h n�1 with big drifts and cut visi- throp must have been on the low zero Friday night and a- tC '1�C CL 4k A DA I' 7- � ' I U F bility to almost zero. The edge of the worst part of the gain Saturday morning. e e 6)JO R C Gi-FL Px A N / O S�/A P,wind and drifting snow moved storm. Zero visibility forced O R � P E N F F/ / S u from west to east. Some The storm came on the � ,+ p _
at least one Gibbon couple heels of the warmest day this Zero temps prevailed for Pla h1 N A H F A D f'O1� �� � �R,IJ 0$
3 points schools were cancelled. Oth- into the ditch between Win- y #16 Jon Spaude, p . �v
year. A high of 28 degrees the icy racing at Clear Lake #40 Jeff and Pete Gu is-
ers in this area, like Gibbon, g8 f 9
throp and Gibbon and big afternoon. Fol- point
sent the students home by drifts blocked that road. was recorded at 2:00 p.m. last Sunday a ber g, 1 Po
9:30 a.m.. All the loose Wednesday. The previous lowing are the racing results: #75 Larson Seed Farm, 1
Stalled vehicles blocked "X'.Q- ti 1't eah �cs+l\s
snow on the ground, prior to man area roads. high for 1979 was 24 degrees, #50 Don Haas, 9 points point �'Y/
Y on January 19 and 21. The #13 Jacques Seed, 7 points POWDER PUFF �/ �1� pAh"�& �sE vOIK
Thursday's storm, was temperature had been below #90 Crow's Nest, 6 points Connie Turtle, 1st -� �- -g'✓1�Q (t a
whipped up and this was a #78 Brad Spaude, 5 points Jean Spaude, 2nd � 1E R IE L .f-
big factor in the blocking of The winds subsided after freezing for 54 days. Margaret Larson, 3rd �
all roads. midnight. Temperatures #66 Dale Isaacson, 4 $
Perfect cond :lions needed to avoids pring floods
Sr. PAUL P�O EE RESS DISPATCH
By HUGHES hester,
Austin and Red River Valley areas, ac- decreasing flood potentials which now exist over Graff said limited or minor flooding could occur
Staff Writer Feb.24,1979 3 Saturday cording to Graff,who heads the Twin Cities office. southern Minnesota and southern Wisconsin," in the Zumbro River Basin, posing a threat to
He said avoiding spring floods would take"a very Graff.'s statement said. Rochester, Zumbro Falls, Theilman and communi-
The only way large areas of the Midwest — in- slow warm-up with melting during the day and Specifically, he said, moderate flooding is most ties northward. Rochester suffered the worst dam-
cluding Minnesota — will escape moderate to se- freezing at night, coupled with less than normal likely to occur in the Root River Basin in southeast- age in its history in a flood last July.
vere spring floods is if this winter's snow melts un- precipitation." ern Minnesota. Moderate flooding also is possible in CITY OFFICIALS and county civil defense direc-
der ideal conditions, meteorologist John Graff said Meanwhile, city and county officials from around the Cedar River Basin around Austin, center of two tors are urged to take note of the flood potential in
Friday. the state are scheduled to attend the annual Gover- major floods caused by heavy rains last summer, their areas, Graff said. Interviews with many of
In their second special flood statement of the nor's Natural Disaster Conference March 9 to assess and rivers and tributaries southeast of Rochester. them Friday show they are closely monitoring the
year,National Weather Service officials said weath- the situation and review flood plans. GRAFF DEFINED moderate flooding as water situation.
er conditions during the next two to three weeks will MINOR FLOODS COULD occur along the Missis- rising as high as flood stage to "moderate The Kansas City River Forecast Center said that
be critical. Special statements were issued simulta- sippi River in the Twin Cities, Hastings, Red Wing, overflows." because of the severe nature of the snowmelt poten-
neously in Kansas City and the Twin Cities. Lake City, Wabasha,Winona and cities in between. That term was applied to the Red River Valley tial, it will begin issuing forecast updates more fre-
Communities along the Minnesota River from also. The current outlook there is for moderate quently.
SO dE FLOODING is virtually assured no matter Communities
to Mankato could experience minor flood- flooding from the Bois de Sioux River to just north Severe flooding is now possible in many areas of
how gradual the spring thaw, NWS officials at the ing as well,lie said. of Fargo and on to Grand Forks. southern Wisconsin, Iowa, northern Illinois, some
Kansas City River Forecast Center said. "Temperatures and precipitation during the next Too quick a spring thaw also will cause ice jams areas of North and South Dakota and Montana,fore-
The threat in Minnesota is stron;est in the two to three weeks will be keys to increasing or at bridges,causing rivers to backup,he said. casters said.
Lamberton News- 6 Winter engulfs area Made/ia, Minn. Vo% 108, No. 35
Thursday, February 21, 1979 g Thursday, Feb. 22, 1979
DR. GEO. J. GERhdANN
Winter again engulfed the Store personnel did not get to Lamberton Monday afternoon In E OPTOMEMST
southwestern part of Minnesota work on Thursday. Some who when he drove through a deep
last week as strong winds, an did remained overnight in town. cut in the highway near Garvin NEW brings AR
ULM, HNN. 56073
inch of new snow and frigid Steve F laig, Dennis Rue and Corner. The visibility was bad izzard �A^ 7 1979
temperatures curtailed many Bob Hadland left Lamberton as drifting snow was going over MAR
scheduled activities, closed about 6:30 a.m. Thursday for a the cut.Rodney's car gotcaught
schools and made traffic come meeting in the Twin Cities. in the drift and he stopped. He ■
to a sliding halt. They encountered very little then was struck by another car
Thursday morning most ris- snow problems until they left coming through the cut. Rue's standsti
ers were greeted by blowing New Ulm on their return trip. car was totalled but he was not
snow with a light snowfall that They became stuck on Highway injured.
blocked nearly all roads and 14 near Essig, got pulled out, Tuesday afternoon light flur-
caused huge drifts. There was and spent the night at Wagon ries again began falling and The first major blizzard of the season hit
little traffic along roads and Wheel West in Essig. before they stopped another 3 Madelia and most of Minnesota last
even Highway 14 became block- Thursday's temperature dip- inches had fallen. Winds pro- Thursday, bringing strong winds which
ed in some areas as the winds ped to a low of minus 25 and pelled the snow during the were clocked at 40 miles per hour in the
caused hard, compacted drifts. Friday's low was a minus 29. night, again blocking some area and from one to two inches of new
Classes at Lamberton Com- Saturday's low was a minus 15 rural roads.As of 8 a.m. classes snow.
munity School were called off while Monday's low was 9 at LHS were two hours late for Many motorists were stranded as the
both Thursday and Friday, above. Mondav the high temp Wednesday. storm moved quickly across the state rt;
giving students an extra long recorded at the SW Station was Some schools in this area, bringing a strong northwestern wind, one
weekend. Classes were not 33 degrees, the first time it has which had classes scheduled for which evoked a wind chill of some 80 below
scheduled for Monday of this been over freezing since President's Day had to call zero.
week, President's Day, and the December 17. school off or some let students
MADELIA SCHOOL buses were sent out
school kept this schedule, rea The frost depth at the SW go home early because of and began picking up children before
Boning that numerous plans had Station on February 19 was 22 drifting snows, making visibil- school officials decided that the storm was
been made for the long holiday. inches. ity very poor and road condi- `. �
Classes resumed as scheduled lions sli er as warmer tem s moving in too quickly and school could not 4
Tuesday morning. formed P e on the roadways.p be held. Bus drivers were contacted by t
radio and told to turn around and take
those children whom they had already A COMMON SCENE on township roads Is like the one above with just one lane open and
picked up back home. snow piled higher than the tops of vehicles. [Photo by Joe Paffell
DR. G. J. GERMANN
OPTOMETRIST
1B'/z N❑. MINNESOTA STREET
NEW ULM, MINNESOTA 56073 April 11, 1978
$t.Paul Pioneer Press
• o
��
Wed.,March 22, '78. MINNESOTA
r
LIE
............
.......... ..
ON:
bi.
............
p®y
G V
{
r
, r
,L: F
z..
a
(pI
i
r
'
Col. Forrest Gay, local Army Corps of Engi- ards while dredging — a standard he says is un-
neers chief, examines a sample of water which reasonable and cannot be met.—Staff Photo by
would meet Pollution Control Agency stand- Sully Doroshow
Corps chief says PICA water
standards too hard to meet
By LEWIS PATTERSON mentally questionable. The costs dredging a given area but causes
Staff Writer associated with many of the re- much more turbidity.
Col. Forrest Gay, chief of the quirements are prohibitive and A representative of the Minne-
Army Corps of Engineers for the would not be wise expenditures apol.is Grain Exchange asked
St. Paul district, Tuesday told of taxpayers money. what effect use of the slower
the Minnesota Pollution Control At the press conference, Gay method and in emergencies only
Agency the Corps cannot comply displayed four
containing ng aried would There will be some shipping.
with PCA terms for dredging the amounts of foreign matter mea- of barges and there could be
Mississippi River. sured on the basis of "Jackson traffic jams,"Gay replied.
The Corps dredges the river to turbity units." One labeled 25 "Will these things happen?"he
keep arsine-foot channel open for units, Gay said, was the amount was asked.
barge shipping.
Gay said PGA demands relat- of turbidity (muddiness) allowed "It's up to the PCA," Gay
y the PCA. replied.
of l b
water quality and disposal The water in the container "But what about farmers?"
re sludge "exceeds the bounds was slightly cloudy in compari- the Grain Exchange representa-
asonableness and thereforre e son to a container of distilled wa- tive asked. "They've got to get
he could not execute the pro- ter next to it. The others, 50 and the grain off their hands and
posed amendment handed him 100 units, were more cloudy but shipped."
by the PCA last Friday. a viewer could see through the "I think there will be delays,"
The Corps chief said at a press
conference that unless the P container holding 50 units. Gay said. "I think thought should
CA be
relaxes its requirements dredg- "There is no way we can com given to rail shipment."
cost is three to four
ing will be done on emergency ply in dredging to keep water as times higher. They can't afford
only. He said he called the press clear as the PCA regulations it"the representative said.
conference because the matter demand," ,
Gay said. "I hope the PCA will consider
needed public attention. Gay said the Corps would re- everybody in this matter," Gay
The PCA was notified of the spond to emergencies and would said, "not just environmentalists
Corps' decision in a letter dated use the older derrick-barge and fishermen and sightseers."
Tuesday and sent to Sandra Gar- method in dredging — scooping The proposed agreement sub-
debring,PCA executive director. up river bottom sediment and mitted by the PCA requires the
"Many of the requirements (in placing it on a barge to be hauled Corps to submit 10 reports,some
the agreement proposed by the to a disposal point. He said it within 15 days of the effective
PCA) are physically impossible would not use the hydraulic sys- date of agreement, some vvitlun
for us to comply with,"Gay said tern which sucks sediment along 30 days,some by Nov. 30. ,-.
in the letter to- Gardebring. with much water from the river
1 "Some of the requirements are bottom. The hydraulic system is ( OV technically unsound and environ- theee to four times faster in I
SAC K SIDE
season's first towboats come down Lake Pepin
St. Paul,Minn. Q
April 8, 1978 a
� a
pill VIII
a
� a
The Emma Borner,first towboat to reach St. Paul this season, grain and coal for the downriver return trip to St. Louis,Mo. Ice
pushes 15 empty barges up the Mississippi River toward St. Paul jams forced the upper river season to be the latest since the
late Friday. The towboat docked below the Lafayette Bridge on April 7 opening in 1960. —Staff Photo by Joe Oden
the downtown side of the river. The barges will be loaded with
Minneapolis Tribune — -- -- -
Wed.,Mar.22, 1978
/�
WHEREAS Bulk Mississippi River Barge Traffic is econom-
Army will ical and reliable for needed coal, machinery, etc. in
notmeet Minnesota for Winter warmth and service.
WHEREAS Minnesota Farm Products are moved safely
dredging. and cheap by river barges to benefit Minnesota Farmers.
WHEREAS needed upper Mississippi River Reservoir
standard capacity is in short supply to serve River Barge traffic.
By Dean Rebuffoni WHEREAS Flood Control measures can be made cheaper
Staff Writer
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and efficient by added river reservoir capacity.
said Tuesday that it cannot meet
stringent requirements set down WHEREAS needed Full Employment will result in shorter
by Minnesota officials for control-
ling the corps' dredging activities work hours requireing (a) attractive (b) wholesome
in the Mississippi River this
spring, and suggested that this
could cause shipping delays, recreation for a calm peaceful public order:
ccorps'topaeaofcer,have`urned NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
the army engineers and the Minne-
sota Pollution Control Agency A New Ulm Dam and Reservoir on the Minnesota
(PCA) from "partners to adversar-
ies." Of all the states in which the
corps dredges waterways, he said, River be reconsidered for (1) Flood Control (2) Silt Control
only Minnesota has directed that
the army engineers comply with (3) Water Purity (4) Mississippi River Barge Traffic (5)
such stringent requirements in its
dredging.
Attractive Wholesome Recreation (6) Self Sufficient
Col. Forrest T. Gay III , the corps'
St. Paul District engineer,said that Electric Power (7) Etc.
many of the PCA's requirements
for dredging are "physically im-
possible" for the corps to comply
with, and that some "are techni-
cally unsound and environmentally
questionable."He said costs associ-
ated with many of those require- °
ments are "prohibitive and would
not be wise expenditures of tax-
payers'money."