HomeMy WebLinkAboutFebruary 20, 1979 TENTATIVE AGENDA
ADJ.REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 20, 1979
Mayor Harbeck presiding
1 ] Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M.
21 Approval of Minutes of January 23, 24, and February 6th, 1979.
31 Communications :
a] Howard Heller family
b] Mn. Housing Finance Agency
c] Scott County Board of Commissioners
d] Hennepin County Park Reserve District
41 Liaison reports from Councilmembers :
a] Cncl .Hullander from the Shakopee Fire Department
b] Cncl .Lebens from Recreation Board
c ] Cncl .Reinke from Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
d] Cncl .Ward from Planning Commission and Jt . Seven Man Committee
e ] Cncl .Leroux from Shakopee School Board
f ] Mayor Harbeck from Scott County Board of Commissioners
51 RECOGNITION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANYONE PRESENT IN THE AUDIENCE
WHO DESIRES TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA!
61 Old Business :
a] On Sale & Off Sale 3. 2 Beer License for the Jabberwocky
Tavern, 109 East 1st Avenue - tbld 1/16
b] Appointment to Police Civil Service Commission
71 Planning Commission Recommendations :
a] Request for conditional use permit to move in a house onto
property located on the E 10C ' of W825 ' of Gov' t. Lot 5 ,
Sec . 15-115-22 , lying No. of CR-16.
Applicant : Edward R. Effertz, 4915 Eagle Creek Blvd.
Action: Conditional Use Permit Res . No. CC-195
Planning Comm. Recommendation: Approval w/conditions
81 Routine Resolutions and Ordinances :
a] Res . 1367 - Requesting 1978-79 Local Planning Assistance
Grant Funds from the Metropolitan Council
b] Res . 1368 - Amending the 1979 General Fund Budget
c ] Res . 1369 - Vacating Certain Streets & Amending Res . 1090
d] Res . 1370 - Requesting Mn. DOT to Install Turning Lanes on
Holmes Street
e ] Ord. #18 - Amending City Code - Requiring certain employees
to be bonded
91 New Business :
a] 8:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Subsidizing Ambulance Service in
Shakopee
b] 8:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Increasing Sewer and Garbage Fees
1 ] Res . 1371 - Setting Garbage Fees
21 Res . 1372 - Setting Sewer Rates
c ] Award bids for two pickup trucks
d] Authorize hiring of individual for Public Works Dept .
e ] City Engineer ' s status report on public improvement projects
f ] Authorize paynent of the bills
g] Transportation allowance for City Engineer
101 Consent Business :
ill Other Business : S Q-
12 ] Adjourn.
Douglas Reeder , -:y Adm nistrator
9
�'��
l n �a
V V
�.�ZON�GIYGi �. �/ZeL��Y
ar+ce;e�rLco��ou.� .fie ra�orirea.,o� g�
���
l
tti�0[�Ct�1C��0O� IOO U?Ong �UCN��c��
February 12, 1979
Mayor Walt Harbeck
City of Shakopee
129 E. lst Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear Mayor Harbeck:
The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency is pleased to inform you
that it has selected and, through the Department of HUD, has
reserved Section 8 housing assistance payments funds for the
Shakopee Seniors development at Levee Drive and Atwood. The
proposed development contains 60 units of elderly housing housing.
The developer is John Bergstad, Minneapolis. The
assistance payments will n�awithqualified
federalrenters
Section $a funds
of their income toward r e
paying the remainder.
"Selection" means that the Agency has inspected and approved the
site, reviewed the proposed development, and will commence mort-
gage processing within 30 days.
Assuming that the proposal is
financially feasible, the Agency will continue work toward a firm
mortgage commitment. It normally takes between five and eleven
months from the time of selection until construction can begin.
Close cooperation is encouraged among the city, the Agency, and
the development team. We would appreciate your informing your
cials of appropriate city departments development
contact t. The tAgency will again
e
notifications regarding approximately
contact you at feasibility approval which could take app
two to four months from selection.
Attached is a copy of the Agency' s letter notifying the developer
of this selection.
2 —
The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency is looking forward to working
with the developer and your city in providing needed housing for
the residents of your community. If you have any questions, please
contact Dianne Orbison, Housing Development Officer, at 296-3029.
Since el
J es J. olem
Executive\:7i.rector>
JJS:mo ` J
Enclosure
January 16, 1979
Mr. John Rerostad
Bergstad I�eVE'ioprre'lt Corporation
2214 IDS Tower-
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
FE: SHAKOPEE SENIORS
Levee Dr i v & 1"I tVJ'0Od
Shakoopp. Minnesota
MHFA x'78-026
Dear Mr.. Bergstad:
41e are pleased to inform you that the Minne_ota Housing Finance Ageinliedafo- thete.
the Shakopee Seniors proposal for Feasibility Processing and has applied
reservation of the necessary Section 8 fun:'s with the U. S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development.
A formal application consisting of a non-rerurd:r �lf'
Application Fee in th`, ar:ount
f $15 per dwelling unit and the items 1 i sted b�irUm� ?�^` s to br''f i nanci al analysi
o p
days. Feasibility Processing includes a thorough miY, number of units , and otn...
and review may chan'J_
aspects of program ra-m,:
The reservation application for Section 8 units alas based on the follo�ring pro9
TO SECTION 8
PI_IT
TYPE OF HOUSING TAL P1U�lS UNITS__--
ELDERLY/FAF1IL.Y)
_—
_" --- 60 60
Elderly
Housin Development Officer (IIDO) assi,ned to this proposal is Dianne Orbison.
Ther Processing Agent should contact the F1 0 a' 296-3 29 trot schedutedan Initial
You _ fter the following forms and information
Meeting .: � �--.
Updated and Completed 201 (3 copies)
_- Updated 202 (2 copies) 003-9110 (Copies are attached)
Develop.- ent Team Qualification Forms
Evidences of continuing land control
Loc,ttion n;ap with corr2r rcial and o'ab� ��hservices located, site pla ,
with alternatives , and site photo9
Zoning ordinance
Current waiting lists and rental surveys
2
Ap
you f'-)I- Y�ljr
on this hr
%•jorl-i nq YOU d�v
S i n c o
;--S 3. o em
ve D ectOv-
A-ti ng Exe
JJS:pr
Attachment Conservative Mortgage C01-I'Da!'y
CC: Al Witch, 'ficer
Dianne Orbisor'l. VHFA Development O-F,
COUNTY COURT HOUSE - SHAKOPEE, MN. 55379 (612) 445-7750 :5
F ebrllar j 12, 1779
9
The Honorable Walter Harbeck
Mayor of Shakopee
1305 West 6th Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Re: Open Forum Meeting Notice
Dear Mayor Harbeck:
This year, as in the past, many issues with serious impact on local
government services, finance, planning and development have groAn out of
the activities of the State Legislature, the Metropolitan Council and other
governmental agencies. It is with this in mind that I have scrEduied an
"open for-am" meeting of city, township and county officials to ,offer an
opportunity for cooperative discussion of these issues in order to i.aentify
their impacts on our jurisdictions and exchange ideas on ,ghat joint or
separate actions might be taken. This- Forum will also be open to discussion
on any topic of common interest that might contribute to this +brai.nstorming"
session..
I have also chosen this oucorta ity to share with you the accomolisrments
of the Northern Scott County Task Force, a voluntary organization of northern
Scott County communities dedicated to dealing with several major issues con-
fronting its member jurisdictions, and have scheduled a presentation early
of
the Greeting to review an all-encompassing report outlining
the task force.
Details of the meeting are as follows:
DATE: Wednesday, March 77 1.979 '
TIME: 7:30 P.M. Convene: Fresez ration on Task Force
Report
8:10 Question and Answer Period
8:30 Coffee and Rolls
9:00 Open Discussion on Issues cf :hztA l
Interest
PEE: Assembly Room, Court House 111, Shakopee
I sincerely hope that you look upon this meeting as a valuable opo ortu ity
to exchange views and -air concerns between local units of government and it is
in this spirit that I invite you and other officials and staff of your juris-
diction to attend this meeting. I am confident that you will find it an
interesting and beneficial experience.
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS " {
�N.
WM. KONIARSKI, District 1
ANTHONY WORM, District 2 ICE C, 1 4 1979
DENNIS HRON, Chairman, District 3
DOUGLAS HAFERMANN, District 4
ROLAND BOEGEMAN, Vice-Chairman, District 5 � �
Scott County Is An Equal Opportunity Employer ,
-2—
Sincerely,
Dennis L. Hron, Chairman
Scott County Board of Commissioners
DLH:np
cc: Mr. Douglas Reeder, Shakopee City Administrator
County Commissioner Dennis L. Hron
James Barton, Metropolitan Council
James Uttley, Metropolitan Council
Kenneth Riesgraf, Planning Director
E. W. Prenevost, Highway Engineer
v
'-�.
r
N
3 ,�
HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE DISTRICT
P.O.BOX 296 MAPLE PLAIN,MINNESOTA 55359 TELEPHONE 473-4693
February 8, 1979
BOARD
OF COMMISSIONERS
JUDITH S.ANDERSON
CHAIRMAN
BLOOMINGTON On behalf of the Scott-Hennepin Park Advisory Board,
CHARLES R.PIHL
VICE CHAIRMAN this notice is sent inviting you to attend a public
ORONO meeting regarding the Development Concept Plan (master
WILLIAM BARBEAU plan) for Cleary Lake Regional Park.
ST.LOUIS PARK
The Park Advisory Board is preparing this Development
SHIRLEY A.BONINE
MAPLE PLAIN Concept Plan for the Scott County Board of Commissioners ,
Hennepin County Park Reserve District Board of Commissioners
AMLIA and the Metropolitan Council . A presentation will be made
of the plan and the various elements taken into consideration
DAVID DURENBERGER in its preparation followed by an opportunity for questions ,
MINNEAPOLIS
comments , etc. The public meeting is scheduled:
ALAN K.GREENE
MOUND Tuesday, February 27, 1979
LAWRENCE F.HAEG 7:30 p.m.
ROBBINSDALE
JUNE HEGSTROM 1,4estwood Elementary School Cafeteria
MINNEAPOLIS Prior. Lake, Minnesota
LISA HOLLENDER (located two blocks east of Hwy. 13 on Co. Rd. 44)
MINNEAPOLIS
RAYMOND N.SEAGREN Kindly call if you have any questions regarding this
MINNEAPOLIS
meeting.
CLIFTON E.FRENCH r
SUPERINTENDENT Gregory A. Mlack, Secretary
Scott-Hennepin Park Advisory Board
(473-4693)
M 3J�
� a
634 West 2nd Ave . ,
Shakopee , MN. 55379 •
February 11 , 1979 •
Mr. Walter C. Harbeck,
1305 West 6th Ave . ,
Shakopee , "MN. 55379
Dear Mr. Harbeck,
Attached for your information is a copy of a letter to Mr.
Krass dated the 7th day of February 1979 •
I would suggest that you and the other members of the council
expend more effort in answering Questions in future Interrogatories
with fact and less in evasions .
In making available to you the convenience of Interrogatories,
instead of Oral Deposition, I had expected more cooperation.
Thank You for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
XZOK-� _
August B. Dellwo,(�-Jr-
634 West 2nd Ave . ,
Shakopee , MN. 55379 •
February 7 1979 •
Mr. Phillip R. Krass,
1221 East Fourth Ave . ,
Shakopee , MN. 55379 •
Dear Mr. Krass,
Thank You for the Answers to Interrogatories by Mr. Walter
C. Harbeck dated the 14th day of January 1979 in reply y Q ues-
tions in Interrogatories dated the 27th day of November,
1978 .
I apologize for not having acknowledged the receipt of those
answers before this
wersetohmakeesurewthatamy to memory rhad a couple
not failed
points in thane ans
me .
I het questionsu and oI have aX few dcomments maboutg o
thepoints
evasions s of of t t q
that I intend to challenge .
Answer to Interrogatory #1--Since Mr. Harr was one of the
few eo le to speak in favor of the project at . the April_, 197
public hearing at the Shakopee
toigheSchool ,
Ton re understand the
e
r eat amount of stud he gave
as he voted to implement the protect at the same council meeting
it which he was sworn in!
The fact that the engineez•ing was done by a licensed engineer
does not guarantee the best and most economical plan, in fact the
greed and arrogance' of the professionals produces just the opposite
result, as witness the Co . Rd. West End Storm
takerthe
Hauer Add'n. Big Ditch and e into Shakopee Professional Bldg. in the Co . Rd. 17 project
we find that the storm and sanitary sewers are in the
same trench alongside one another;
the result of the grades and
levels which were set by a licensed engineer, being 'ignored and
the building being built in total disregard thereof. Why were the
rg ades and levels not enforced by the licensed engineer.
The second and third sentences in Answer #1 are nothing more
than a lot of "evasive pollution" , totally uncalled for by Ques-
tion #1 . Mr. Harbeck did not answer the final portion of that ques-
tion, namely; " "why did he vote to accept the emasculated version"?
Despite any of your "obvious opinions" all of us in the West End
had hoped that there would be at least a minimal benefit, but
there is none east of Harrison
Answer #2 is not supported by the facts and if city hall is
endowed with clairvoyant abilities as to our "obvious intents" ,
then they would not have continued to pursue the West End Fraud,
as they would have envisioned the "inevitable result" , which they
perhaps are now beginning to perceive . I will also demand an an-
swer to that portion concerning
1ith the Ddisregard
19f Judge Breunig' s
warning in his Memo of e
Page 2.
Phillip R. Krass ,
February 7 , 1979 •
Since the toslnterrogatories�mperhapst inflammatory
and evasive Answers your intents
should be opened to question.
At the April 11 , 1977 Prehearing Conference , I made the state-
ment "that the mayor was considering holding a referendum. " Your
��
reply was Why, I didn' t know that! " This after you had informed
Mr. Weinblatt of that fact about a month earlier, this apparently
being an attempt to con Mr. Weinblatt that it was a top secret
matter. When Mr. Weinblatt called me on some other matter within
a day or two of your call, I mentioned that we had heard thata
referendum was being considered, he immediately asked that I trace
that back to it' s source . I did, and it was Mr. Ward who had made
the statement at a Joint Powers meeting, and had added "that it was
probably the only way to settle the matter. " It was also at about
this same time that the hearing referee bit �as discussed, but the
council would not submit to his decision, u
Why???? Some more professional arrogance?
Answer #3 is not responsive to the question, and the determin-
ation of who is responsible or irresponsible is only one of the
purposes of this appeal and any other actions that may follow. In
any case , Mr. Harbeckfssome of last hisperson
renentwho
actionsshould
andehisostateirre-
sponsibility in view o
ment of last Memorial Day weekend.
Mr. Hullander and Mr. Leroux' s answer can only be construed
as arrogant and defiant evasiveness.
Mr. Reinke ' s annhinsdtatementsndemandlchallengeP of
no substance and a couple of s
There will be challenges to Mr. Price ' s answers .
I would very much like to accept Mr. Ward' s inswersaas true intents, but the record indicates that his
per-
formance are not one and the same .
In the most flagrant evasions, I will restate the questions
once in more simple language . This is a paradox in view of the
extensive questionedaaurinmy formal
takingeducation-an
depositiansattempted put-
down-that were pos g the
If after restatement the answers are not responsive , I will
be of the opinion that the respondents would find it more conven-
ient to be orally deposed, and I will act accordingly.
Please thank Mr. Meyer for teriodcourtesy
correspondence . that
hope
extended to me during our brief p
that I accorded him treatment in kind, as that was my intention.
Thank Youl
Sincerely,/0 lell&
r
Aug st B. Dellwo, r•
.j
3 �
STATE OF MINNESOTA
' ovv][CE OF THE GOVERN'O'R
ALBERT H. QUIE ST. PAUL 55155
GOVERNOR
January 10 , 1979
The Honorable Walter C. Harbeck
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
129 E. First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear Mayor Harbeck:
It is a pleasure to receive your kind invitation to
dinner and a council meeting in the City of Shakopee in the
near future. Thank you for thinking of me .
My schedule during the first two months of the
administration is completely given over to the pressing
activities of assembling my legislative program, budget
and staff .
Thus , I will be unable to accept your invitation.
I hope you will extend my greetings to everyone
in attendance. My best wishes ,
nce
ERT H. QUIE
Governor
Haim
.SAN 12 1971
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
r
STATE OF MINNESOTA
OFFIC3 OF TuEGovERNOR
ALBERT H. QUIE ST. PAU1. 55155
GOVERNOR
February 15, 1979
Honorable Walt Harbeck
Mayor of Shakopee
1305 West 6th Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear Mayor Harbeck:
We are approaching the time of year when nature can
once again cause problems for many of us. The effects of
the disasters of 1978 continue to be with us. It is my
concern that the State and its political subdivisions be
prepared to protect life and property should we be subjected
to any disaster that may occur.
As part of the State's Preparedness Program, I am
calling a Conference on Natural Disasters to be held at
the Sheraton-Ritz Hotel, 315 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis,
Minnesota, on Friday, March 9, 1979, starting with regis-
tration at 7:30 a.m. Please consider this an invitation
to you, members of the governing body, and your Civil
Defense Director to attend.
In addition to a presentation on the Spring Weather
Outlook for 1979 by Mr. John Graff, Meteorologist in Charge,
National Weather Service Forecast Office, we will be discuss-
ing other disaster related subjects.
With best regards, I am
Sincerely yours,
ALBERT H. QUIE « !!
Governor
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
DIVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
B5 - State Capitol
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
GOVERNOR'S NATURAL DISASTER CONFERENCE
March 9, 1979
Sheraton-Ritz Hotel
315 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, Minnesota
REGISTRATION FORM
Registration for the Governor' s Natural Disaster Conference $11.00 per person
Civil Defense Coordinator
Name Dennis Anderson Organization City of Shakopee
476 Gorman
Name Organization Shakopee, Minn. 55379
Name Organization
Name Organization
Name Organization
Please return this form with your remittance no later than February 26,
1979 to:
Minnesota Division of Emergency Services
Room B5 - State Capitol
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Attention: Ms. Honey Harkenrider
PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: DISASTER CONFERENCE
Total Amount Enclosed: $
Registration will be in the Foyer outside of the Cotillion Ballroom from 7:30 a.m. to
9:00 a.m.
]_/24/79
PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Reg . Session Shakopee , Minnesota February 8 , 1979
Vice Chairman Coller called the meeting tn order at 7 : 40 PM .
Present were : Comm. Koehnen, Colligan & Rockne . Comm. Marschall
arrived at 7 : 50 PM. Absent : Comm. Perusich and Chrmn. Schmitt .
Also present : Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator.
Colligan/Koehnen moved to approve the minutes of January 25 , 1979
with the amendment to Page 5 in Item 6 "berns" and not "ferns" .
Motion carried.
' Rockne/Colligan moved to open the public hearing on the request
for Conditional Use Permit to move in a house onto property
located on the E 100 feet of W 825 of Government Lot 5 , Section
' 15-115-22 , lying No. of CR 16 . Motion carried .
City Admin. passed out photographs of the house to be moved .
The house is presently located in Hopkins .
\� Ed Effertz , applicant , was present for discussion. He stated he
needed approval as soon as possible since the house is already
to go and he needs to start digging on the basement as soon as
a decision has been reached on the Conditional Use Permit .
Koehnen/Rockne moved to approve Conditional Use Permit No . PC-195
regarding moving the house on to the property located on the E
100' of W 825 ' of Gov' t . Lot 5 , Section 15-115-22 , lying No . of
CR 16 with the conditions that it is brought up to Code within
six months , a Building Permit be obtained and proof of ownership
provided on the land which the home is to be placed. Motion
carried .
Prairie View 3rd Addn :
Discussion was held on the rezoning of the property .
Rockne/Colligan moved to set a public hearing for February 22 , 1979
at 7 : 30 PM on the request for rezoning of Prairie View 3rd
Addn. and on the preliminary plat thereof . Motion carried.
Continuation of the Public Hearing on the Re-Naming of CR 83
to be placed on the agenda for the February 22 , 1979 meeting to
allow time for the City Admin. to speak with Prior Lake .
Comprehensive Development Plan:
Discussion was held on the location of the public hearing for
the Comprehensive Development Plan. The Planning Commission
recommended leaving the decision of the location to the City Admin.
MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: Nancy Engman, Administrative Assistant
RE: Resolution Requesting Planning Grant Assistance
From the Metropolitan Council
DATE: February 8, 1979
As you are aware the city received an entitlement of planning
funds from the Metropolitan Council last year (1976-1977) . These
were part of the funds appropriated by the Legislature to offset
the costs of comprehensive planning dictated by the Land Planning
Grant .
The Metropolitan Council is now offering the City an additional
$10, 622 as a 1978-1979 grant . These funds are also provided by
the State Legislature to be used for comprehensive planning purposes .
The proposed Resolution and executed copies of the grant agree-
ment must be returned to Metro Council by March 14th if we are to
receive the money .
NE/jsc
e
` k
RESOLUTION NO. 1367
t
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING
1978-79 LOCAL PLANNING ASSISTANCE GRANT FUNDS
FROM THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
WHEREAS , the Metropolitan Land Planning Act , Minnesota Statutes ,
Section 473 .851.-473 . 872 , requires that the City of Shakopee prepare
and submit a comprehensive plan to the Metropolitan Council. ; and
WHEREAS , the Metropolitan Council and the City of Shakopee
entered into a contract , numbered 77109 and dated January 6 , 1978,
for a Local- Planning Assistance Grant for 1976-77 grant funds in
the amount of $9 ,247 .00 to assist the City of Shakopee in carrying
out the required planning; and
WHEREAS , the Metropolitan Council has allocated $10,622 to
the City of Shakopee in additional grant: funds for 1978--79 ; and
WHEREAS , the total grants from the Metropolitan Council will
not exceed 75 percent of the total cost or 100 percent of the
remaining cost of carrying out the required planning which is
documented in Appendix A of the above referenced contract . '
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Shakopee requests the additional
1978-79 grant funds and authorizes the appropriate officials to
execute the Agreement Amendment to the above referenced contract
on behalf of the City of Shakopee .
Adopted In session of the City Council of
the City of Shakopee , Minnesota held this day of
1979.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
C i t Crk '
y
Approved as to form this
day of _-'
City Attorney
f
RESOLUTION NO. 1 i()8
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1979 GENERAL FUND BUDGET
WHEREAS, the 1979 General Fund Budget was dully adopted by Resolution
No. 1313, and
WHEREAS, The City Council has approved pay adjustments and the hiring
of an additional employee, and
WHEREAS, The City Council appropriated monies to buy three police squad
cars out of the 1978 Budget,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA, that the 1979 Budget be amended as follows:
Account Increase Decrease
Administration
Salaries - Full time 21720
PERA 136
Pensions-FICA 104
Health & Life 315
Workmen's Comp. Ins. 80
Assessor
Salaries- Full time 89751
Salaries - Part time 4,000
PERA 482
Pensions - FICA 535
Health & Life 474
Workmen's Comp. Ins. 11000
Other Prof. Services 4,000
Finance
Salaries - Full time 11461
PERA 137
Pensions - FICA 151
Health & Life 25
Workmen's Comp. Ins. 100
Inspections
Salaries - Full Time 9,610
PERA 530
Pensions - FICA 591
Health & Life 218
Police
Salaries - Full time 141578
PERA 1,462
Pensions - FICA 105
Health & Life 790
Workmen's Comp. Ins. 43
Capital - Vehicles 191000
t
Account Increase Decrease
Engineering
Salaries - Full time 14,350
PERA 245
Pensions - FICA 213
Health & Life 690
Workmen's Comp. Ins. 480
Streets
Salaries - Full Time 221828
PERA 810
Pensions - FICA 21203
Health & Life 1,460
Shop
Salaries - Full Time 21310
PERA 130
Pensions - FICA 145
Health & Life 120
Workmen's Comp. Ins. 89
Forestry
PERA 56
Unallocated
Contingency 43,145
807351 80,351
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota held this th day of February, 1979.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this th
day of February, 1979.
City Attorney
RESOLUTION #_1369
A Resolution Vacating Certain Service Drives Herein Described and Portions of Shawmut
Street and Legion Street Herein Described
WHEREAS, Two service drives hereinafter described were platted and dedicated to
the public use in and by the Plat of the American Legion Addition; and
WHEREAS, That part of Shawmut Street and that part of Legion Street herein
described are dedicated streets; and
WHEREAS, It has been made to appear to the Council that it would be to the best
interests of the general public to vacate said portions of the said service drives
and Shawmut Street and Legion Street; and
WHEREAS, The Council has set a date for a public hearing at which time to
consider the vacation of said portions of said service drives and streets and due
notice of the hearing has been given, as prescribed by law; and
WHEREAS, All persons desiring to be heard on the matter were heard at the public
H
hearing in the Council Chambers in the City of Shakopee; and
WHEREAS, The Council has been fully advised in all things;
b THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE That:
A. It finds and determines that the vacation of a portion of the service drives
hereinafter described and the two public streets is in the public interest and they
serve no further public need as service drives or streets;
B. That the following portions of the service drives and streets as hereinafter
described are hereby vacated, to-wit:
1. That part of the 30 foot service drive as platted in American
Legion Addition lying north of and abutting Lot 3 of said plat,
except the East 17 feet of Lot 3;
2. That part of the 40 foot service drive as platted in American
Legion Addition lying north of and abutting Lots 1 and 2 of said
plat;
3. That part of Shawmut Street North of the right-of-way line of
the Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Company and south of
the south line of First Avenue;
4. All of Legion Street, dedicated by the American Legion Addition to
the City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the northerly right-of-way of the
Chicago Northwestern Transportation Company and the westerly right-
of-way of County State Aid Highway 17 from which the south quarter
corner of Section 6, Township 115, Range 22, bears S4° 42' 35"W,
a distance of 3,584.24 feet, Thence S 79° 43' 33" W, a distance of
80.01 feet to the southeast corner of Lot 4, American Legion Addition,
Thence N o° 48' 33" E along the easterly line of said Lot 4, a
distance of 242.20 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 4,
thence N o°48' 33"E, a distance of 30.53 feet to the southerly right-
of-way of Trunk Highway 101, thence N 79° 44' 03"E along the southerly
g �
right-of-way of said Trunk Highway a distance of 27.50 feet to the
westerly right-of-way of County State Aid Highway 17 , thence S 10°
17' 25" E along the westerly right-of-way of said County State Aid
Highway a distance of 267.63 feet to the point of beginning, con-
taining 0.330 acres more or less.
C. That the City reserve, however, to the City of Shakopee, its licensees
and franchise holders a perpetual 16-foot wide easement on and under the said
vacated streets and a perpetual easement on and under those portions of the
vacated service drives for utilities with the right to install , maintain, repair.
lay and re-lay the utilities by the City, its licensees and franchise holders.
D. That Resolution No. 1090 passed in the adjourned regular session of the
Shakopee City Council held the 26th day of July, 1977,be and the same hereby is
rescinded.
E. After the adoption of this Resolution, the City Administrator shall file
certified copies hereof with the County Auditor and the Recorder-Registrar of
Scott County.
Passed in session of the Shakopee City Council held this
day of 1979..
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk-Administrator
Prepared and approved as to form
this h day of February, 1979.
City Attorney
MEMO TO: Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg M. Voxland , City Treasurer,UV
DATE: February 15 , 1979
RE : Employee Bonds
The City Code specifically mentions the City Administrator as
requiring bonding . Because this position is delineated, the
blanket bond coverage we have does not satisfy the legal
requirement of the Code . The blanket bond of $50,000 is the
broadest of the standard bonding coverages . A separate bond
on the City Administrator would merely be duplicating unless
higher limits are deemed necessary. I recommend that the City
Code be amended to delete the mention of the City Administrator
position with reference to bonding per attached draft ordinance .
Also, we currently redundant coverage on the Assessor, Treasurer
and Deputy Treasurer . I recommend these policies be dropped.
Action required : Ordinance to amend City Code , motion to
allow separate bonds on Assessor, Treasurer and Deputy Treasurer
to be cancelled or allowed to lapse .
GMV/jiw
Attachment
h
w
ORDINANCE NO. 18 Fourth Series
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE AMENDING SHAKOPEE CITY CODE, CHAPTER 21
ENTITLED"ADMIiNISTRATION AND GENERAL GOVERNMENT" BY REPEALING SUBDIVISION 7,
SECTION 2.05
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION I: Shakopee City Code, Chapter 2 Amended as follows:
Subdivision 7 of Section 2.05 of the Shakopee City Code is hereby
annulled and repealed.
SECTION II: Provisions after Adoption
Afteradoption, signing and attestion,this ordinance shall be
published once in the official newspaper of the City and shall be in effect on and
after the day following such publication.
Adopted in _ session of the Shakopee City Council held this
day of 1979.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Administrator
Prepared and approved as to form this
5th day of February, 1979.
Julius A. Coller, II
City Attorney
PERSONNEL POLICIES
FOR
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
FEBRUARY 28, 1979
INDEX PAGE NO_
Purpose. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Scope of Policy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Appointments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
Probationary Period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
WorkHours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vacation Leave With Pay . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' ' 5
GroupInsurance . • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' • " . . . .
Sick Leave • • • • • • • • • • • • " " * ' * "
MilitaryLeaves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Maternity Leave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Leaves Without Pay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Jury or Witness Duty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Rest Periods and Holidays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Resignation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Severance Pay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
GrievancePolicy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lay-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Disciplines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unlawful Acts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
PERSONNEL POLICY FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Section 1 . Purpose :
Purpose of this Personnel Policy is to establish a uniform and
equitable system of personnel administration for employees of
the City .
Section 2 . Scope of Policy
Subdivision 1 . Personnel Covered - Except as otherwise
specifically provided, this policy applies to all employees
of the City except the following:
1 . All elected officials .
2 . The City Attorney and the Health Officer.
3 . Members of City boards , commissions and committees .
4. Volunteer fire fighters and other volunteer
personnel .
5 . Emergency Employees .
6 . Other employees not regularly employed in
permanent positions .
Subdivision 2 Provisions superseded in certain cases :-
Any employee included in a collective bargaining agreement
entered into in accordance with the Public Employment Labor
Relations Act , Minnesota Statutes Sections 179 .61 or any
other agreement entered into between the City of Shakopee
and a group of employees shall be
-2-
exempt from any provision of that part which is inconsistent
with such agreement . Any employee within the jurisdiction
of a personnel board or civil service commission estab-
lished under Minnesota Statutes Chapters 44, 419 , or 420
is exempt from any provision of this part which is incon-
sistent with such statute or rules and regulations adopted
thereunder . Nothing in this part is intended to modify
or Act, MinnesotanStatutes1Sectionse197 .45 Veteran' s
to 197 .481 .
Section 3 . Definitions :
Full-Time Employee : An employee normally scheduled to fill a full-
time position with an on-going regular work week of at least forty (40)
hours (excluding scheduled break periods) .
Immediate Family: Shall mean mother, father, husband, wife , son,
daughter, brother, sister, or grandparent of the employee or spouse .
Part-Time Employee: An employee scheduled to fill a part-time position
with an on-going regular work week of less than forty (40) hours
(excluding scheduled work breaks) .
Permanent Employee : Shall mean an employee who is appointed to a
permanent position effective completion of a probationary period.
Position: Shall mean a specific employment , calling for the performance
of certain duties and carrying of certain responsibilities of one
individual .
Probationary Employee : Shall mean an employee originally appointed to
a permanent full-time or part-time position subject to a probationary
period .
Temporary Employee : An employee who is appointed on a temporary basis ,
either full or part time , for a continuous period of time not to
exceed one year.
Section 4 Appointments :
Subdivision 1 : General
Every appointment to municipal service shall be made by the City
Council on the basis of merit and fitness promotion whenever It
shall be the intent to fill vacancies by p
practicable . When required by law or by the City Council , merit
and fitness shall be ascertained by written, oral , or other
examinations designed to evaluate the ability of the candidate to
discharge the position for which the examination is held. A
physical examination may be required by the City Administrator for
any position.
-3-
Subdivision 2* Applications
All applicants for a position with the City of Shakopee are required
to file an application on forms provided by the City . Any applicant
giving false information or making false or misleading statements on
the application shall not be considered for the position or will be
subject to immediate dismissal with complete loss of benefits .
Section 5 Probationary Period:
Subdivision I . Purpose - The probationary period is an
intregral part of the selective process and shall be
utilized for observing the employee ' s work, for securing
the most effective adjustment of the employee to the
position and for rejecting any employee whose performance
does not meet the required work standards .
Subdivision 2 . Duration - Every original appointment
and every promotional appointment is subject to a
probationary period of six months after appointment .
Subdivision 3 . Termination - The City .Council
may terminate a probationary employee anytime during the
probationary period if in the City Administrator'
-s
opinion the working test indicates that the employee is
unable or unwilling to perform the duties of the position
satisfactorily or that his habits and dependability do
not merit continuance in the position. The employee so
terminated shall be notified in writing of the reasons
for the termination and shall not have the right to
unless appeal
in Mi veteran, n h
nnesotaStatutes Secion 197 .46shallcbeure
prescribed
followed .
A permanent employee ter inated during the probationary
period from a position tcwhich he has been promoted or
transferred shall be reinstated to a position in the
class from which he was promoted or transferred unless
he is discharged from the City service . If a permanent
employee promoted or transferred to a position not in
the competitive service is terminated from that position,
he shall be reinstated to a position in the class from
which he came unless he is discharged as provided by the
rules.
Subdivision 4. Extension -- Any employee' s probationary
pe riod may be extended for an additional six (6) months
if the City Administrator requests and the City Council
approves such extension.
-4-
Subdivision S . Completion - An employee who has completed
the period of probationary service and who has not
received within thirty (30) days of completion of that
period, a written notice from the City Administrator
upon approval by the City Council that his services are
terminated or his probationary period extended in
accordance with Subdivision 4, shall be considered to
have successfully completed the probationary period and
attained the status of permanent employee.
Subdivision 6 . Vacation and Sick Leave - During the
initial probationary period vacation leave and sicK leave
shall be earned and may be used. If employment
terminates prior to completion of the initial probationary
period, no payment for accrued vacation or sick leave shall
be allowed .
Section 6 . Compensation:
Subdivision I . Amount - Employees of the City shall be
compensated according to the schedule established by the
City Council annually by resolution. Any wages or salary
so established is the total remuneration for employment,
but shall not be considered as reimbursement for official
travel or other expenses which may be allowed for the
conduct of official business .
Subdivision 2 . Evaluation - Evaluations of each City
employee at least annually shall be used by the City
Administrator in recommending salaries and wages to
the City Council .
Subdivision 3 . Temporary and Part Time Employees -
Whenever an employee works for a period less than the
regularly established number of hours a day, days a
week, or weeks a month, the amount paid shall bear
the same relationship to the full-time rate for the
position as the time actually worked bears to the time
required for full-time service . Temporary employees
are not entitled to sick leave, vacation leave, or
holidays with pay . Permanent part time employees are
entitled to sick leave , vacation leave and holidays with
pay earned for the time actually worked .
Subdivision 4 . Overtime - Employees to whom the state
fair labor standards act applies shall be compensated
for overtime rates at one and one-half the regular rate
of pay . To the extent permitted by law, compensatory
time off shall be taken as approved by the City
Administrator.
-5-
Section 7 . Work Hours :
Work schedules for personnel shall be established by the
appropriate department head with the approval of the City
Administrator. The regular work week for employees is five
eight-hour working days in addition to a lunch period, Monday
through Friday, except as otherwise established by the
department head in accordance with the needs of the
department .
Section 8 . Vacation Leave With Pay:
Subdivision 1 . Amount - All part time and full time employees
sEall earn vacation leave in accordance
with the following schedule : For part time employees this shall
be computed on the basis of time actually worked.
From 0 through 5 years of continuous
employment - 10 days
From 6 through 15 years of continuous
employment - 15 days
16 plus years of continuous employment 20 days
Subdivision 2 . Accrual - No more than ten days of
accrued vacation leave can be carried beyond December
31st into a new calendar year, unless specifically
authorized by the City Administrator with the approval
of the City Council which approval shall be granted only
for unusual circumstances . All accrued vacation in
excess of this maximum shall be stricken from the
accrual records and lost,
Subdivision 3 . Terminal Leave - A permanent employee
who is separated for any reason shall be paid for any
accumlated unused vacation leave , provided, however,
that should an employee resign without giving two weeks
written notice , except for reasons of ill-health, he
shall forfeit his right to accumulated vacation leave .
Subdivision 4 . When Taken - Vacation leave may be used
as earned subject to approval by the department head of
the time at which it may be taken.
Section 9 . Group Insurance :
Hospitalization, major medical and life insurance coverages shall
be provided to all permanent and probationary employees after 30
days of continuous service, with the City paying a minimum of $75
toward the total cost of these coverages for the individual
employees and their dependent coverage premiums.
-6-
Section 10. Sick Leave :
Subdivision 1 . Amount - All part time and full time
employees shall e entitled to sick leave with pay
at the rate of one day for each month of full time
service . For part time employees this shall be
computed on the basis of time actually worked . Sick
leave may be accumulated to a maximum of 100 days .
Subdivision 2 . Purposes - Sick leave may be granted
when the employee is unable to perform work duties
due to illness , disability , the necessity for medical ,
dental , or chiropractic care , childbirth, or exposure
to contagious disease where such exposure may endanger
the health of others with whom the employee would come
in contact in the course of performing work duties .
Sick leave may also be granted for a maximum of three
days for death or serious illness of an employee ' s
immediate family .
Subdivision 3 . Proof - To be eligible for sick leave
with pay, an employee shall :
1 . Report as soon as possible to his
department head the reason for his absence .
2 . Keep his department head informed of
his condition if the absence is of more than
three days duration.
3 . Submit a medical certificate for any
absence if required by the City Administrator .
Subdivision 4 . Penalty - Using or claiming sick leave
for a purpose not authorized by Subdivision 2 may be
cause for disciplinary action under Section 20 .
-7-
Subdivision 5 . Accrual During Leave - For the purpose
accumulating adolf-t-f-o—nal vacation or sick leave , an
employee using earned vacation leave or sick leave is
considered to be working.
Section 11 Military Leave :
Every employee to whom Minnesota Statutes Section 192 . 26 or
192 . 261 applies is entitled to the benefits afforded by those
sections,
Section 12 Maternity Leave :
Any permanent , full-time or part-time employee shall be granted a
maternity leave without pay upon approval of the City Administrator.
A maternity leave of absence shall not exceed five months duration.
Section 13 Leaves Without Pay:
The City Council may grant any permanent employee a leave of
absence without pay for a period not exceeding 90 days except
that it may extend such leaves to a maximum period of one year
in case the employee is disabled or where extraordinary circum-
or sick� leavet judgment ,
beeftssallraccrueuduringeasleave of absence
or
without pay .
Section 14 Jury or Witness Dui:
When an employee performs jury duty or is subpoenaed as a
witness in court or voluntarily serves as a witness in a case
in which the city is a party, the employee is entitled to
compensation from the City equal to the difference between his
regular pay and the amount received as a juror or witness .
_Section 15 Rest Periods and Holidays :
Subdivision 1 . Rest Periods - Every regular employee ,
when working under con itions where a break period is
practicable , shall be granted a 15-minute break period
in each half of the employee' s shift . Each department
head shall schedule rest periods so as not to interfere
with work requirements .
Subdivision 2 . Holidays - The City Hall shall be closed
for business on each such holiday, but employees may be
required to work on paid holidays when the nature of
their
redttosworktonsa conditions
required re
-8-
off within 30 days thereafter as the department head
determines unless consideration is given to this
factor in determining work schedules . Part time
employees are entitled to pay on a holiday only if they
would normally be scheduled to work on that day of the
week designated as the holiday and they shall be paid
only for the number of hours they would have worked .
Subdivision 3 . Holidays - The following holidays
prescribed and regulated by Minnesota Statutes Section
645 .44 Subdivision 5 for public offices shall be observed,
plus the observance of Good Friday.
DATE HOLIDAY' S CELEBRATED
1 - January 1 New Year' s Day
2 - Third Monday in February President ' s Day
3 - Friday before Easter Good Friday
4 - Last Monday in May Memorial Day
5 - July 4th Independence Day
6 - First Monday in September Labor Day
7 - Second Monday in October Columbus Day
8 - Fourth Monday in October Veterans Day
9 - Fourth Thursday in November Thanksgiving Day
10 - December 25th Christmas Day
All employees shall receive such holidays off with pay,
and whenever a major holiday falls upon a Sunday, the
following Monday shall be observed in lieu thereof .
Whenever a major holiday falls on a Saturday, the preceding
Friday shall be observed in lieu thereof . If any
allowable holiday occurs during the employee ' s scheduled
vacation, it shall not be counted as a part of said
vacation.
Section 16 . Resignation:
Subdivision 1 . Procedure - Any City employee wishing
to leave the service in good standing shall file with the
City Administrator, at least fourteen (14) days before
leaving, a written resignation stating the effective date
of the resignation and the reason for leaving. Failure
to comply with this procedure may be cause for denying
such employee future employment by . the City o.f Shakopee
and denying terminal leave benefits .
Subdivision 2 . Unauthorized Abse ceXnauthorized absence
from wor or a period of three 3) consecutive working
days may be considered by the Cityi.Administrator as a
resignation without benefits .
-9-
Subdivision 3 Re-employment : No employee who has resigned
will be considered for re-emplo meearwhasoelapsedxaftertthe
if a period of more than one y
effective date of his resignation.
Section 17 Severance Pay:
Any permanent employee wn°shall separated
receive afrom
lumphis
sum position
paymentbtorincludent ,
discharge , or resignation nused vacation leave , p lus an amount
compensation for all accumulated u
equal to one-third the value of allcwagelscadle. Providedcthatlated
on the basis of his current y or
should any employee
ofeilgnhealth without hegiving ltwo
forfeitshis written
rightntolall
except for reasons
accumulated leave.
Section 18 . Grievance Policy:
It is the policy of the City insofar as possible to prevent the
occurrence of grievances and to deal promptly with those which
occur . When any employee grievance comes to the attention of a
supervisory employee , the supervisor shall discuss all relevant
circumstances with the employee , and his representative if he
so desires , consider and examine the causes of the grievance , and
attempt to resolve it to the extent that he has authority do do
SO . If the grievance ishot dealt with satisfactorily at that
level , the grievance may be carried up to the next higher
administrative level , including the City Council .
Section 19 . Lay-offs :
After at least two weeks notice to the employee , the City
Council may lay off any employee whenever such action is necessary
because of shortage of work or funds , the abolition of a position,
or changes in organization. No permanent or probationary
employee shall be laid off while there is a temporary employee
serving in the same class of position for which the permanent
or probationary employee is qualified, eligible , and available .
Section 20. Discipline :
Subdivision 1 . In General - City employees shall be
su ject to discip inary action for failing to fulfill
their duties and responsibilities , including observance
of work rules adopted by the Council . It is the policy
of the City to administer disciplinary penalties without
discrimination. Every disciplinary action shall be for
just cause and the employee may demand a hearing or use
the grievance procedure of Section 18 with respect to
any disciplinary disciplinary action which he believes is either
unjust or disproportionate to the offense committed .
The supervisor or department head shall investigate any
allegation on which disciplinary action might be based
before any disciplinary action is taken.
Subdivision 2 . DisciDlinary Action Steps - Except for
severe in ractions , i.scip inary action against any
employee shal be progressive and follow the steps
listed below in numerical order:
1 . Oral reprimand .
2 . Written reprimand . A written reprimand shall
state the employee is being warned for misconduct ;
describe the misconduct ; describe past actions
taken by the supervisor to correct the problem;
urge prompt correction or improvement by the
employee ; include timetables and goals for improve-
ment when appropriate ; an*utline future penalties
should the problem continue . The employee shall be
given a copy of the reprimand and sign the original
acknowledging that he has received the reprimand .
The signature of the employee does not mean that he
agrees with the reprimand. The reprimand shall be
placed in the Cityy ' s file on the employee but shall
be removed from thefile after one year from the
date of issuance if there has been no subsequent
reprimand and no other disciplinary action has
been instituted .
3 . Suspension without pay. Prior to the suspension
or as soon thereafter as possible, the employee
shall be notified in writing of the reason for the
suspension and its length. Upon the employee ' s
return to work, he shall be given a written
statement outlining further disciplinary actions
should the misconduct continue. An employee may
be suspended pending investigation of an allegation.
A copy of each written statement shall be placed
in the employee ' s personal file , but if the suspension
is for investigation and the allegation proves false,
the statement shall be removed and the employee shall
receive any compensation towhich he would have been
entitled hhd the suspension not taken place .
4 . Dismissal . The Council may dismiss any employee
after the employee is given a notice in writing at
least five days before the effective date of the
dismissal . The notice shall contain the reasons
for the dismissal ; the employee ' s rights under these
rules and the veterans ' preference law if he is a
veteran; and a statement indicating that the employee
may respond to the charges both orally and in writing
and that he may appear personally before the City
Council .
i
' -11-
Subdivision 3 . Other Disciplinary Actions - The
following other disciplinary actions may be taken
against any employee after steps 1 and 2 on Page
11 have been followed :
a . Involuntary demotion. This step shall be
taken only if the employee does not have the
ability to function at the higher level .
b . Forced transfer to a comparable position
under a different supervisor. This step
may be taken only if the problem is due to
personal incompatibility between the
supervisor and employee .
C . Withholding a salary increase o4t decreasing
the employee ' s salary . The employee shall be
notified in writing of the action and the reasons
therefor . A copy of the notice shall be placed
in the employee ' s file . In no case shall an
employee ' s salary be decreased below the minimum
of the salary range of the class .
Subdivision 4. Hearing - In any case of suspension,
isa , or demotion, the employee shall be granted
• hearing before the council if the employee submits
• written request for such a hearing to the Council
within five working days of notfication of the
action taken. The hearing shall be held within ten
working days from the date the request is filed or
at the next regular City Council meeting if none is
held within ten working days .
Section 21 . Unlawful Acts :
Subdivision 1 . Fraud - No person shall willfully
or corruptly make any false statement , certificate,
remark, rating or report in regard to any test , certificate
or appointment held or made under the City personnel
system, or in any manner commit or attempt to commit any
fraud preventing the impartial execution of the provisions
of these regulations .
Subdivision 2 . Bribary - No person seeking employment
to or promotion in t shall either directly or indirectly
give , render or pay any money, service or other valuable
consideration to any person for or in connection with
his test , proposed appointment or proposed promotion.
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S . Reeder , City Administrator
RE: Ambulance Agreement
DATE: February 1 , 1979
Attached is a proposed Ambulance Subsidy Agreement with
St . Francis Hospital . This agreement has been worked out with
the City of Savage and the hospital and I think is a more reasonable
approach than initially requested.
As you will recall , the original request was for a subsidy of
$1 . 75 per capita which would have amounted to $18,522 for Shakopee .
The attached agreement calls for a three year agreement with
the following costs :
1979 - $1 . 15 per capita
_ $12 , 213
1980 - 1 . 25 per capita = 1 . 25 X Metro Council population
1981 - 1 . 25 per capita = 1 . 25 X Metro Council population
This agreement has the following advantages :
1 . It insures better (para medic) service for Shakopee
2 . It is at a lower cost than originally requested
3. It is much cheaper than operating a local "volunteer"
ambulance service
4. It is in line with the subsidies given by other cities
to the major ambulance services
5. It is a three year agreement which avoids requests for
large increases at least for three years
Recommendation
The City Council , at budget time , allocated $18,000 in the contin-
gency fund for the purpose of possibly funding this subsidy. It is
recommended that the Council now authorize the Mayor and City Administrato
to enter into this three year agreement contingent upon the acceptance
of the agreement by all the other cities and townships .
DSR/jsc
SCOTT/FRANCIS
AMBULANCE SERVICE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the Cities of Savage and Shakopee and the Townships of
Sandcreek, Louisville and Jackson, Scott County, Minnesota
(hereinafter referred to as Scott/Francis) are authorized under
Minnesota Statutes, Scction 471 .476, to provide ambulance service
by contracting with any person, firm or other political subdivision
upon such terms and conditions as may be agreed upon, and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes , Section 471 .59, permits two or more
governmental units to jointly or cooperatively exercise any power
common to the governmental units (such as providing ambulance service
as above described) , and
WHEREAS, St. Francis Hospital Ambulance Service, has submitted a
proposal dated August 8, 1978 (which was subsequently altered through
negotiations) for which ambulance service would be provided for three
years beginning July 1 , 1979 for a per capita per annum charge of
$1 .15 for the year beginning July 1 , 1979, $1 .25 for the year beginning
July 1 , 1980 and $1 .25 for the year beginning July 1 , 1981 , and
WHEREAS, the Scott/Francis Communities desire to jointly assure that
adequate ambulance service is available and recognize that a public
subsidy is necessary for the purpose of receiving adequate ambulance
service,
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements
of the parties hereto, said parties hereby agree as follows:
A. St. Francis Hospital Ambulance Service hereinafter referred to a5
St. Francis) agrees as follows:
1 . That it will operate an ambulance service in a professional
and businesslike manner during the term of this Agreement
including, but not limited to, its' other commitments
herein contained.
C�
2. That it will , at all times , provide and have available
within the jurisdictions of the participating communities
two(2) properly equipped ambulances meeting all current state
licensing requirements. From July 1 , 1979 , or the date the
Advance Life Support operations begin, whichever is later, to
July 1 , 1980, one (1 ) of said ambulances (primary) shall be
continuously staffed twenty-four hours per day with two (2)
qualified paramedics, if possible
, or with one(1 ) qualified
paramedic and one (1 ) Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) .
After July 1 , 1980, the primary ambulance shall be staffed
with two (2) paramedics. St. Francis will attempt to staff
the other said ambulance (backup) , when needed, with quali-
fied paramedics and/or EMT's. If staffing personnel is not
available for backup ambulance, St. Francis will secure another
qualified ambulance service to answer call . This shall not
be construed as an obligation of St. Francis to have, at all
times , two (2) ambulances in said area if one or both leave
said area for the purpose of transporting, to a medical
facility, a patient load that originated within said area.
3. That it will , notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement, provide ambulance service in such a manner that
the response time within each Scott/Francis Community shall
be a maximum of twelve _L12) minutes, ninety percent (90%)
of the time.
4. That the rate schedule described in Section B. shall remain
in full force and effect for the term of this Agreement.
5. That it will furnish, on a monthly basis, a report to
Scott/Francis Communities, itemizing, on a community by
community basis , data related to all responses, including, but
not limited to, date, nature, point of origin, destination
and response time.
�l
6. That it will furnish annually to each Scott/Francis
convnunity financial information, itemized in reasonable
detail , on its operations within the service agreement area.
Additionally, it agrees to permit, at reasonable times , the
Chief Administrative official of each Scott/Francis com-
munity or their designated representative, to review and/or
audit its financial records.
7. That it will hold harmless each Scott/Francis community from
any and all claims or legal action resulting from operation
of the ambulance service. St. Francis shall file with Scott/
Francis, upon execution of this Agreement, a certificate of
insurance naming each Scott/Francis participant as an addi-
tional insured under St. Francis' insurance policy in the
following minimum amount: General liability - $300,000 Single
Limit and $100,000 Property Damage, Auto Liability -
$ 250,00/5 00,000 and $ 100,000 Property Damage.
8. St. Francis shall coordinate basic first responder education
and provide on-going education for the Shakopee and Savage
Police Departments, and the Scott County Sheriffs Department.
This is not to be construed that St. Francis shall be
responsible for the training and/or skill levels of these
first responder units.
9. When a patient requests, the St. Francis Ambulance Service
will take the patient to the facility of his choice within a
forty (40) mile radius, unless it is in the best interest of
the patient to take him elsewhere as determined by the
ambulance personnel .
B. Scott/Francis Communities a-grees as follows:
1 . To pay St. Francis Ambulance Service, upon receipt of invoice
once every three (3) months during the term of this Agreement
the following amounts from each Scott/Francis city for
ambulance services described herein beginning 7/l/79.
C11, c�
A. Savage 1 ,190.25
B. Shakopee 3,053.25
C. Sandcreek 454.25
D. Louisville 247.25
E. Jackson 488.75
TOTAL QUARTERLY 5,433. 75
2. For the following years 1980 and 1981 the rates shall be
determined by using each jurisdictions current populations
as established by the Metropolitan Council multiplied by
$ 1 .25 per capita per annum.
C. Agreement Term:
1 . This Agreement shall become effective upon the approval and
execution of the Agreement by St. Francis Ambulance Service
and all five communities within Scott/Francis.
2. This Agreement shall be effective July 1 , 1979 and shall
terminate June 30, 1982.
D. Cancellation:
1. Either Scott/Francis or St. Francis Ambulance Service shall
have the right to terminate this Agreement, with cause,
by providing the other party with ninety (90) days written
notice by certified mail .
E. Equal Opportunity EmplOyer
St. Francis recognizes that the Scott/Francis are equal opportunity
employers and hereby agrees to adhere to a policy of non-discrimin-
ation and Equal Employment Opportunity.
• cj-) Q./
Approved this day of December, 1979.
St. Francis Ambulance Service
By — President
and
Secretary
Approved by Scott/Francis Communities as follows:
Date of
Council
Approval
Savage By — and
Mayor Clerk
Shakopee By _ arid
Mayor Clerk
Sandcreek By and
Chairman
Louisville By and
Chairman
Jackson By and
Chairman
'r
9
MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
SUBJECT: 1979 Sewer Rates
DATE: February 15, 1979
Pursuant to staff meetings and re-evaluations of factors involved, the follow-
ing data has been developed.
The proposed 1979 Sewer Fund Budget has been revised and is included herein.
Data on revenue needs and rate proposals is presented on a cash basis because
cash flow is the primary concern in developing the 1979 rates.
Cash needs for the fund for 1979 are:
Expenditures per revised budget $ 474,707
Less non service charge revenues 4,500)
Revenue needed from service charge 470,207
Less: MWCC Flow Pymt. 363,162
Debt Service 19,500
50`,� Capital Outlay X21 00000
Total needed from availability $ 66,515
Based on target receipts of $65,545 for availability, the following rate op-
tions may be considered:
Present Rate 4 Rate A
Connection charge $/yr. 20 20 22
Flow maint. charge $/mg 35 40 40
Flow o/1000g Flow/usage .55 .71 .59
Rate 4 and A should provide revenue for 1979 as follows:
Connection charge 2500 customers for 1 qtr. @ $20 1yr. = 12,750
Connection charge 2550 customers for 3 qtr. @ $22/yr. = 429075
Flow Maint. 402 mg for 1 qtr. @ $35/mg = 3,500
Flow Maint. 402 mg for 3 qtr. @ $40/mg = 12,100
Total Availibility Revenue 70,425
Note: Flow maintenance charge is paid by 22 customers.
The Metro Waste Control Commission charge to the City of Shakopee for 1979 is
$403,443• Estimated flow is 700 mg. revenue projected from flow/usage charges
is as follows:
1979 Sewer Rates
Page 2
7 0 mg/yr. @ 55o/1OOOd for 1 qtr. $ 96,250
g/Yr• @ 590/1OOOg for 3 qtr. 309 750
Total flow revenue $ 4—
Availibility Revenue
Flow Revenue 709425
Other Revenue 406,000
Total Revenue 0
$ 480,925
The difference between the $403,443 that MWCC charges us and what we are
trying to recover through the flow charge and our actual cash payments of
$363,162 is that MWCC is paying the debt service through us and a y in us
on installments for purchase of the City Sewer Plant and refund on final
cost allocation for 1977.
Revenue of $480,925 shown above and total budget expenditures of
$
approximately 9
balance. The credits from MWCC for the 1 llocat7 on
and purchase of our plant approximately offset the cash draw downforone
half the capital expenditures through the availability charges. The other
half of capital outlay will be recovered through availability charges next
year.
Projections for revenue are based on the assumption that flow will remain
stable for next year. Projected revenue balances cash outlay as shown above.
However, there is a delay in collection of bills so that as of 12/31/79 it
is expected that there will be a decrease in the cash balance over the year
of approximately $10,00.
The differential in the flow charge from the previously proposed rate #5 and
the current proposal of Rate A is due to revision in budget, and a decision
to tie the flow part of the rate to the MWCC gross charges using any credits
to increase working capital and provide cash balances to cover unexpected
repairs and capital outlay.
The average residential flat rate equivalent for the present rate is $4.65,
for rate #4 it is $5.91 and for rate A it is $5.37• The flat rate equiv-
alent is necessary because the rate can be calculated individually for com-
mercial customers but the utility billing machine does not have the capacity
to bill residential customers individually. With this equivalent flat rate,
indutrial, commercial and residential
rate. (as a class) users all pay at the same
The current proposal of Rate A is a significantly smaller increase in charges
to users and is predicated on a t.ightrr budget. Barring unforeseen large ex-
penditures for repairs to the sewer system, the fund should be in acceptable
condition at year end.
GMV/klk
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
SEWER FUND BUDGET
979
Account Actual Budget Estimated Budget
1977 1978 12/31/78 1979
REVENUE
3136 Permits 758 700 - -
3336 MWCC Payments 1905 11000 617 1,000
3710 Sewer Service Chg. 342165 4369325 394,100 4769425
3711 Sewer Conn. Chg. 63,425 459000 449288 -
3810 Interest earned 5j477 5,000 59647 39500
3950 Refunds 343 - - -
TOTAL REVENUE $413,714 ___$4d8-025 W4 4 52 $480,925
EXPENDITURES
4100 Salaries - Full time - - - 15,000
4112 Overtime - Full time - - - 400
4130 Salaries - Part time - - - 300
4140 PERA - - - 865
4141 FICA - - - 960
4150 Health & Life Ins. - - - 610
4220 Gen. Supplies 2128 29500 31633 39000
4230 Equip. Maint. 414 11000 11404 1,700
4232 Vehicle Repair 6 300 299 350
4234 Util.Sys. Maint. 1,475 40,000 49033 10,000
4310 Legal Services 56 100 - 100
4312 Eng. Services 16127 21000 3,434 2,500
4315 Other Prof. Serv. - - 7,390 5000
4350 Legal Notices 26 50 - 50
4351 Printing 48 60 - 50
4360 Gen. & Liab. Ins. - - 203 230
4361 Prop. & Boiler Ins. - 200 - 100
4362 Vehicle & Equip. Ins. - - 312 330
4382 Machinery Rental 8f 150 195 150
4384 EDP Equip. rental 3,17 3,600 - -
4393 Awards & Indemnities 63 1,500 11131 19500
4411 Current Use Chges. 321917 357,519 355,291 3639162
4413 E.C. Deferrment 10948 6,750 69750 69750
4412 Reserve Capacity 60,56 46,778 411659 -
4980 Refunds 9,62 - 53 -
4990 Miscellaneous - - - -
426j341 46 21559 4257787 395,072
4511 Capital Equip. 59 - - 421 000
4710 Transfers 17,000 37,0()0 - - 37 000 19,500
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3 93 499,559 4 2,74 2,7 474,707
GMV__/klk
and than chow a ra to at w yet a
Above, children at Central check in the mirror to see how well they had brushed. (Claire Robling photo.)
Sewer, ar a e rate l es S
to be consi*dered .dt E�
. a.
ti
The Shakopee City Council will hold a public hearing month,"Reeder explained. "This compares to the above tl
at 8:30 p.m. on Feb. 20 to, consider increasing sanitary survey as a quarterly charge of $17.73, which is still tl
sewer service charges. below the average of current rates." w
An increase is being considered at this time due to The proposal for rates is designed so that all classes tt
higher charges from Metropolitan Waste Control Com- of users (residential,commercial and industrial) pay for
mission for treatment of sewage and rising costs for the sewer service at the same rate based on their. c
City's operation.of the system. flow/ usage. h
"Also,revenues for 1978 fell short of projections,and Residential users are billed on a flat rate basis p
there is a significant amount of new and replacement (same amount per month) which is determined based on a
equipment being considered for purchase,"according to average residential water use: Because the proposed
City Administrator Doug Reeder. "With the increase rate is based on an anticipated implementation date of b
proposed, the sewer fund should be able to man4in or May 1, residential sewer charges for the year of 1979 A
experience a slight deterioration in its cash position would rise approximately 18 percent. "However, it is i
based on projected cash flows.'' advisable to Deep in mind that 10 percent of the 18
In a recent survey of 14 area communities, percent relates to the 197$shortage," said Reeder.
Shakopee's current residential rate of$13.95 per quarter Also scheduled for adjustment with the March 1
Was found below the average-af;19,41. The highest rate billin#_is the mite for garbage service for those customers C
surveyed was $33.75 and the lowest was $12.$4. who Are billed ' by tbip Shakopee Public Utilities �o
Under consideration is the proposal to change the Commission and are not senior citizens.
rate to a flow charge of 71 cents per gallon, up from 55 "The rate increase is 14 cents per month,which is the
cents per gallon; and the charge for large flows from$35 increase to the hauler under the terms of the contract s
per million gallons to $40 per million gallons annually. approved by the council last year," Reeder explained. d
There is no proposed change in the service charge of$20 Residents who wish to be heard on this matter are
per year. being urged to attend the Feb. 20 hearing, in the
. "What this equates to for the residential customer is Shakopee City Hall council chambers. Entrance to the s
a change in the flat rate from $4.05 per month to$5.91 per council chambers is in the rear of the city hall. p
p Pupils lose ke to school i
a
d
by Jerry Barney
Y Y Senior High Principal Mike Walsh In other action- Monday night, the
From now on, students won't be said that previously, there have been board approved:
allowed to drive Shakopee School occasions in which students have y
District-owned vehicles. driven school vehicles to athletic -An increase, from $60 to $62 per
Citing safety and ligbility con- events. The new policy, which elimi- student, for behind-the-wheel driver F
siderations, the Shakopee School nates this, is expected to make more education. r
Board passed a resolution to that bus rental necessary, and cost the -The resignation of faculty mem-
effect at a Monday night meeting. school district an additional $3,000 a ber Robert Kieber, effective March 9 t
"The only exception to this policy year, Walsh said. contingent on the hiring of a suitable f
shall be if,the district hires a young replacement.
b
person to operate one of the lawn The policy also says that staff p
mowers during the summer season," members who operate school-owned -Long-term substitute teaching
the resolution says. "Further, no vehicles shall have proper licensing contracts for Mary Sparta (129 days,
student shall be allowed to drive or for that purpose. Those who operate $7,391.70); and Nancy Rossman (86
otherwise use his/ her own vehicle buses must have the additional li- days, $4,764.40). 1
for school use," it continues. cense class as required by law."
a�3n
Rees to head Alternative
Energy Subcommittee �. x.
X 9Y
Representative Tom Rees, IR-E1- Rep. Rees is the'only freshman
7 t ?to,has been appointed as chairman of iegi.slator to serve as ? s0c,)mmittee'
°Ih. A xta
,-i... tII. _>.�,.. ca n,�w.•pnJ.1 u.if`n � .. '+s rte. u _r� ,,,,,,.
9
RESOLUTION NO. 1371
A RESOLUTION SETTING GARBAGE FEES
WHEREAS , the City of Shakopee has previously entered into a
contr.-act for garbage and refuse collection; and
WHEREAS , said contract provides for a price increase of 14¢
for regular urban customers effective with the January 15th to
February 15th billing cycle ,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKOPEE:, MINNESOTA, that garbage and refuse collection fees shall
be $3 . 26 per month for urban residences and $2 . 1.0 per month for
senior citizens in urban residences .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Resolut Lori No . 1209 is hereby
repealed in its entirety .
This resolution shall. be in force and effect for bills sent
out on or about March 1 , 1979 .
Adopted in Regular Session of the City Counci-1 of the City
of Shakopee , Minnesota , hell this th clay of February , 1979 .
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City C1er.k
Approved as to form this th
day of February, 1919 .
C:i i y Attorney i
� t�A= CITY OF SHAHOPEE
' r 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
4
,ors ra � 1
MEMO
TO: _ Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg M. Voxland , City Treasurer
SUBJECT:Truck Bids - February 16 , 1979
DATE: February 20, 1979
Two bids for trucks were received by bid opening time . The
bid from Waconia Ford is $236 . 90 less than the bid from
Malkersons . However, the Ford bid does not meet specifications
on springs and rear axle capacity .
Recommend award of bid to Malkersons per specifications and
bid of $12 ,023 . 90
i
GMV/jiw
CITY OF SHAKOPEE February 16 , 1979
`6 BID TABULATION SHEET
4 :00 PM
NAME Waconia Malkerson
Ford Motors I
t '
' I
MAKE Ford Chevrolet
I �
i
i
DELIVERY 30/90 days 60 days
I
i
1
NET BID I '
$11 , 787 .00 $12 ,023 . 90 I
i
ALTERNATE BID
I
1
1 Rear axle 200
DEVIATION ! lbs. under '
S
Rear springs
260 lbs . ea.
under
Front springs
225 lb. ea.
under
MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder , City Administrator
RE: New Employee , Park department
DATE: February 15 , 1979
The 1979 budget allowed for the addition of one new employee
in the park department . We received over 30 applications and
interviewed the top five applicants .
After review of the applicants , it is our recommendation that
Dick Cheever is the best qualified applicant for this position.
He has worked for the City on a part time basis for several years
and we have been very satisfied with his work.
Council Action:
Motion to hire Dick Cheever as a Park Maintenance Man at
$6.00 per hour with an increase to $6. 50 per hour after successful
ccmpletion of the probationary period. (The current rate for the
park crew is $7 . 50 per hour. it is anticipated that this new
employee would be equal in salary to the rest of the crew after
two years , however , this may have to be open to negotiations next
year. )
DSR/ jsc
r cacti e�t5 - 1�flol;ca�mn of tf icy and Cheever lS
eel 1--0-1(f I I/ce, dafa.
c*scx vpolo��n o� PO 71) v^6r �
_
3-- / . ^ ' ' ^,ouw� vsmpue 7{pw opacx,p7In* ^ccuomr w].' ,wv. * p.'o.* *1 ""nSi^np
25,00 awE§lCuwr1TY u CYY~ - nuF81 nUn,
25,00 +
°
--- -----p5-90--------- AV?O-CEw?nW['8uPPLT'--' - nFlv-.AUnP\ IFS
»e/15/79 5"«s xo?o cc*rmAL *o*pLv SMALL rnnLn (11:4221;:(11:4221;:441:44 1~�z� ~�ux~«o
e �
^ � mv 11300 uoYO CEw?put oonpLv VEHICLE w4Iw?, o1~*23p-311~nt
''
v«^ /� ^ Y-«/1s/79 - -` -u,OV— '--'uUY� CEmYw�L 8DnPL ' VEp1CLC M«YNT. -'
oQ^4'1)3 11//15/7 9 p»,uo xurn CENTRAL ouppLv vE*IcLp *xrwY,
o*^,.`� "a�s�/v 9*.06 xuro uEm7nx� ����» vEwlc�p wmwr" »�,u����ua���^�L
---- -- ' -- '--- �«S�VFa---- '-- -- — ------ - ----' — --'----
r
p' _ -- - 77,"3�m8-��' ---*'w-ope*o* cLpereT,C ----n-EN.IUPPL I.Fo o�~upan~«w~mo �op7
^°m~c°o
o 15/19 190.02 AKINS FIRE EQUIP, EQUIP. MOINT. 01-4230-121-32 9100
('46023 02/15/79 JACK ANE)EPSON A150C. ENG. SFRVICES Al-4312-411-4t
.14.61) AMES OFFICE SUPPLY OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-t2l-12 3A24
222o-66 i
04h033 02m5/79 11,51 eEnFm$ GEwouppl-us 01-4?20-181-18 2a
\_o4o»�.� - 02/19/79 __- 82.50 aEnEw8 sEm,mupp��Fm 01-4220-311-31 27
- '-- D� -�- ---- ' -- --- - ' ' — - -- - ---------------
4, ------ --'-- -'----��
s
~
0*6037 odvis/7" 3,730,5a uuw°rno Ll'F "nL nEVIT, m1.4921.5~9ti-nt
1 f
1 1
191'4 1l IV I'F jH rim IIPtt CHECK REGISTER 07 PO 79 PAGF P
C.,frC I- is A,af1UNT VENOOR tTFM DFSrRTPTInN ACCOUNT NO, TNV, # P.O, r -FASACV
+.++.. -
#A#_CI(5 --
udr al x/15/79 5.0n ROD BASSINGFR VEHICLF MAINT. 01-4232-321-32
.0o
AAkA++
0A6 ,5u n�/15/79 86.00 BULLSEYF RELOADING rEN.4UPPI-IFS nl-4221-311-11 401721
86.00
•++-CK3
1-.69 COAST TO EOA3T --01-4720-
n.,. (,1 12/15/79 4.89 COAST TO COAST GEN.SUPPLIFS 01-4221-411-41
- o'l 12/15/79 19.6.2 COAST TO COAST GEN.SUPPLIES - _ 0�-422 -021-a2—_____•_-_.__
i purrbl 11 ?/15�74- -1-- 1x19 COAST TO COAST GEN�9UPPLIES n1-4228-441-44
27.39 #
***-CKS
046. 64 02/1`+/79 161.40 CLAYS PRINTING PRINTING nt-4351-12t-12 1324
161.40 #
poi-,165 112115/79 - 331647.00 CAPESIUS AGENCY NORKM_ENS COMP.INS. 01.4151.011-9l 5041.-- i
11/15/79 - -- -- -----___ .__._.. _._._. -- -- - - - - - - -- - - --
our.bl,5 X0.00 CAPESIU9 AGENCY GEN. INS, n1-4360141-14 59A3
33.667.00 #
------- ----------------------
- ---J
�#++#+ ###•CKS
046-13 02/15/79 55.50 RONALD CARLSON TRAVEL ExPENSE Al_-4330-311-31
------ --- - -- -
UTh`I�".i u�/15/79- ----- ----- --z0,67�------ R(INALD CA�L30 ALHOOL n1-4391-311-31
76.18
o'le r�7 02/15/79 32.73 CONTINENTAL SAFETY FQUIP.MAINT. n1-0230-32f-32 57038
##
046093 nl/15/79 15.60 DUNNING 8 HOWE, PEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-311-31
046093 02/15/79 -- - -11.65 DUNNING S HOWE. CEN. SUPPLIES 01-4221-421-42 -_
0 4 F+u 11./1 / 9 266.22 - -_ - DUNNING 9 HDWE.-- --- - -CCQTHING �1.4223.321.32
omhn93 o2/15/79 11.94 DUNNING S HOWE. BLDG. MATNT. ni-4231-622-62
305.41 #
18.00------WILLIAM ENGEL
046124 n2/15/79 5.25 WILLIAM ENGEL TRAVEL EXPENSE A1-4330-321-32
23,25 # --
0"1-1 -.__ FIHE INST. ASSN. __._..�UFS. n1-4391-32t-:2
191'4 I.Itr ,I Sill)V-01 ,f, CHECK REGISTER 07 ?0 70 PAGF A
LrilC ;V. :r If AMOUNT VENDOR TTFM DFSCRTPTION ACCOUNT NO TNV. N P.C. k 'A F'ASAgF
S.Oif *
aaaaaa a.a–CK9
F v 62?4 02/19/79 20.00 HENNEN4 SKELLY MOTOR FUELS 01-4?2?•331-13
6?14 n?/15/79 9.75 HENNEN-9 SKELLY VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-311-31
aaaa.a ***-CK9
04f," 1v fjz/15/79 158.40 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIP. FUTP.MAINT. nl-4?30-634-62 85836
158.40
as*aaa *a*-CK9
D7f6?33 ---- t<Z7I577Y- - ---�7�b------F[fUSE-IIF PRTEIT- - ---BEN;- �iE�--- -- --�i=n� ►- 1i=1t 3o T-
0 4 f_2.4 5 02/15/79 51.65 HOUSE OF PRINT GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-331.33 2440
as*aaa ***-CK9
(� -II46�1-------- t;77i5/79------ --56;DIf--------i�Fii--------------- -------SUES -- - - - -----_-7f1�Y39�1�1� 032h��--------- -----------
50.00
046253 X2115179 104.44 ITAICA FOUIP. GEN. SIIPPLTE9 ni-422n-42t-02 9?2411
' �S- *
aaaaaa ***•CK9
046?_91 02/15/79 855.00 KRASS 9 MANAHAN LEGAL SERVICES 01-4310-161-16
046291 02/15/79 20.00 KRASS 3 MANAHAN LEGAL_ SERVICFS 01-4310.163-16
__ — EGAL
dd6c9i----i771577� AKEN _-_— L 3E4V UT ---
F-D46Z�e - �12ji5774 -3�I.75- KDENfiER-� 3T11A6AR6 MOjOsf FUELS 61-L���=Ti1-31
046?9? 02/15/79 17.26 KOEHNEN-S STANDARD VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-311-31
52.01
a*aa*a ***-CKS
i_
040312 - 6271517v — -`- i 00 _- -- LEb�uE ��Miu;-CtTiE� - - oA631? ---e1=4391=i2i-02—_
046312 02/15/79 20.00 LEAGUE OF MN. CITIES SURSCRTPTIOI, n1-4391-141-14
1.195.00
*aaaaa ***•CK9
_ 046327 i77I517q__._ �a�.._ 13T30 I1�PLFh1`Nfi_. E�iIIP,MAW.
046327 02/15/79 32.84 LAND IMPLEMENT EUUIP.MATNT. 01-4230-639-62 106251
36.97_
****** ***-CK9
D-4634-2 02IiSJ7� --�–__--- �I17 A9--- -- MALKE�S(1N M'��1TfIF2S VEHjtLE MATNT, nl-4?3?-ZI1- 1 S�Ohu
L I
I I y F CHECK RFGISTER 02 PO 74 PAGF 4
CHECS 1'. 0A IF AmnUNT VENDOR OEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO@' TNV, 0 P.'O.' # MEISAG F
64i,Aue, 62/i�j74 - -ni-4ili.321-32 502A4
156.94
_i i-;lk iT
046348 02/15/79 310.00 ROBERT MC ALLISTER PROF. SERVICES 01-4315-361-36
l4hi4� 615.10 MOBIL OIL MOTOR FUELS 01-4222-421-42 011n7q
**'I*-CI(3
Oukb-;Sl 02/15/79 3.29 MOTOR PARTS GEN.SUPPLIFS 01-4220-321-32
046351 02/15/79 6.40 MOTOR PARTS GEN.SUPPLIFS 01-4220-621-62
0 4-6 35 1 T)2 It
046351 Oe/15/79 ??.Os MOTOR PARTS VEHICLE MAINT, 61:4232-621062
046351 (4/15/79 127.96 MOTOR PARTS CAP.EQUIP* 01-4511 w441-44
244.38
146152 62/15/79 321.96 MINNEGASCO GAS STATEMENT 01-4371"18118
046357 6 2/15/"
,046352 NNEGASCO w4371•182o16
U46351 112/15/79 538,96 MINNEGASCO GAS STATEMENT 01-4311-311-31
ne/15/79 104647 M I N N E G A$C 0 GAS STATEMENT 01-4371o321-32
646351 6,3/15 i79 -0T-7 AS—— MINNEGASCO 01-4371-421-42
o4b3s2 n2/19/79 248:85- MINNEGASCO CAS STATEMENT 01-4371-622-62
006352 02119179 248.85 MINNEGASCO GAS STATEMENT 01-4371-622-62
f0461S2 2 it'l.T/-T'V
046152 0 2/I5/79 226,72 MINNEGASCO 4AS STATEMENT 01-4311-639*62
2,669,16
***-Cws
f -1-771`15/79 1, to I , 1 14
046363 n2/15/79 44.96 MPLS, STAR PRINTING 01-435I-411-41 14677
OU6363 02/115/79 9110 MPLS, STAR SUI)SCRIPTION sisus
0'16 s 7 1; 02/15/79 12.00 MN, ST, SUP, ASSN* DUES 01-4391o421-02
12.00
***.Cws
-6 f;42i0-;Tflf 2 t 4
07____M I TE
1.00
046382 ()2/I5/79 650.00 mO(JnYS INVESTORS PROF. SEPVTCFS 55-4315-Q11-Q1
• 650.00
1979 CITY OE SHAKUPLE CHECK REGISTER 0? ?0 70 PAGF s
CHECK NO. UAIE AMOUNT VENDOR— — -ITEM OESCRIP7ItIN ACCOUNT NO, tNV. a P 'O. w "FgSAGr
,. ""0AF3F8_ _..__rZ7IS7T4----- -------- - 5Z�Ti-- --- --1V•MT-�QCt PflON�'AICC__-_—_._ __...-7f���3Z1�12���2_—__._
046386 X2/15/79 33.50 NW BELL PHONE PILL 01-4321-151.15
04638b 02/15/79 50.27 NW BELL PHONE RILL 01-4321-182-16
s3'96 -----rt77I5774--`- - -zS�-S�-- "_HECY---- -----pp -GILT. Ifi-=4321-'3iT•3i — - _ - ------
046386 02/15/79 58.25 NM BELL PHONE BILE 01.4321-321.32
0463$6 02/15/74 8.50 NW BELL PHONE 9ILL • 01.4321-351.35
_-GA63ri�+ --- --,?7I57T9---- - - ---7I;ss _ `--AIT�3ELC___._______.--_-•- aaONE -PfILL
1 ,02q.1u # -
3BT-- NN3ER V.`3Ti EQOIF#"--"FVWP;mW Nr. 7f��T0�i-•�0�5r,!'—-- — - - -
123.00
046411 02/15/79 100.00 PATCHIN APPRAISALS PROF. SERVTCES 01-4315-121-12 7928
*#**#* ***•CK8
046414 02/15/7v 86.16 PAKO FILMSHOPS GEN.SUPPLIFS 01-4220-141-14 854A
-- - - - ------- --
06.16 *— ----- -- --- -- — - - —------- ------- ----
***a* ***.CKS
L
- __FL —--
021I5774-------------Z,S-.ab--- -`PE71A$DN �R19T� MI�C. —_—_ ---------��-�14�-�i��•12 13'fuZ--------
25.00
046448 02/15/79 42.55 REYNOLDS MELDINO 04.3UPPLIES 01.4220-441-44 !7446
#**•CKS
046450 02/15/79 36,00 RIE9 HEATING SLDG.MAINT,, n1.4231-311-31
046450 02/15/79 77634 RIES HEATING BLOG,MAINT. _— Olm4231-622.62 — —-
046452 02/15/19 15.80 DAVID RAQUET RMALL TOnLM n1-4225-441-44 30013P --
C
##*#*# ***+CKS
- --------�I—ftfZ�"ji-i-7l-gbu�i�l-----------------. ..----
4.00
*#*-CKS
046465 02/15/79 . 69.00 RING, FIRE EXTG, FGUIP.MAINT. 01.4230-321-32 47 ^I
#**#** ***•CKS
1979 LITY i!F SHAKOPEE CHECK REGISTER
0? 70 79-24GF
CHECK Nf). 0ATk AMOUNT I VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO*" INV. 0 0:0. 9 MESSAGF
046467 b21/I S171
23.10
W-j-j-j7-
046477 02/15/79
SUEL BUSINESS OFF* SUPPLIES 01-4210-1-21--J2
046477 0 p 71;i 7 q 6.09- SUELgUi 'OFF.-SUPPLIES- ---
046477 n?/15/79 54.36 SUEL BUSINESS OFF SUPPLIES
046477 0,>/15/79 38.75 SUEL BUSINESS OFF, SUPPLIES 01-4210-311-31
04677 -------
046477 02/15/79 116176 SUEL BUSINESS OFF# SUPPLIE$ 02-4210-411-41
046477 08/15/79 22.02 SUEL BUSINESS OFF, BUPPLIEB 4
0t--4230-121-t2
046477 ()?/15/79 138.94 SUEL BUSINESS CAP-OFF.FQUIP. 01-4512-311-31
706.72
04647e 11.31 SHAKOPEE LUMBER GEN.SUPPLIrs 01�4220-421-42 933*
u.3-t
046479 02/15/79 776.85 SHAKOPEE VALLEY P118. LEGAL NOT PUR. 01-4350-121-12
046479 02/15/79 8100 SHAKOPEE VALLEY PUB, PRINTING ni-4351-121-12
" Odbu7q- -- -112115-iT9 ` 6 7b-- SHAKOPEE VALL__EY_F6r.____JFWN G
046479 02/15/79 20*00 , SHAKOPEE VALLEY PUB4 PRINTING 01-435I-411-41
046479 01/15/79 47,42 SHAKOPEE VALLEY PUB4 LEGAL NOT PUB. 13•4350-911-91
55-4350-911-91
938.72
FIRE DtPtb Pt FIRE DEP _01-MO-32t-32
5,364.00
I 046484 02/15/79 48,00 STARK-5 CLEANING SLrG. MAINT. 01-4231-181-18
046484 (,2/15/79 16.40 STARK-$ CLEANING SLOG. MAINT.
01-4231-182-18
0 40,4 8 d4 5/79 17.00 STAPK-3 CLEANING BLps. f4iiNt.
04f)41;4 412/15/70 13.00 STARK-S CLEANING FLOG. MAINT. 61-4p3t 421-42
0464h5 412/15/79 40*00 SPUC A L 0 G.M A I N T 61-423t•182-18
n2/15/79 283.35 SPUC FLEC.STATEmENT MI-4170-181-18
6 4 6 ,1, ;5 ( :/15/14 214.57
04b"A5 0,1/15/79 210.27 SPUC FLFC.STATEmF0T 01-437A:311-31
0464P5 0e/15/79 150.73 SPUC ..FLFC.STATE"EVT 01-4376-321-32
1-6u6_4_ss spuc tLtt.*I�tittijEi4t-------(ii-'4t!��4ii-.;4i- —
046LIA5 oe/15/79 57,65 SPUC ELFC.STATEMENT 01:4370-622-62
046(485 4111/15/19 18,25 spuc FLEC.STATEMENT 01*4370-625-62
646405- spuc
046485 112119179 120.40 SPUC FLFC.STATEMENT
621.35
_SsilsliRmii4 soHvj[Es
1979 CITY OF SHAKOFF.F CHECK REGISTER 02 ?0 74 PAGF 7
�HECh NO. GATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO, TNV. N P.O. 4 4F_SSAGF
04648F - 02/1sIT4 - -------3.03s:tT ----_gpBlTA9?N Fad„---- --__`E`�v�•_ ERVI�ES -- =E3iZ- i�fi=vi-To oi__ —___
6.536.17
046499 02/15/79 . 26,00 ST, FRANCIS HOSPITAL BLOOD TESTS 01-4425.311-31
046ti92 o2/15/79 r 9.95 SMAKOOEE HOMEN 6EN.SUPPLIES 01+4720 421.47
0464v2 02/15/79 4,16 SMAKOPEE HDME6 GEN,SUPPLIES Ai+4220.622.62. ,'
ri-
**A##* ***-CKS
046495 X2/15/79 10.20 SIESENALER TOM TRAVEL EXPENSE tt1.4330-321-32
0u6uv5 '42/15/79 15400 SIESENALER TOM CONFERENCE 01-4390-321-32
Or6uv5 n21i577� __ ---.--_--5.00 _ ..__.5UF'$- ___ o1�u391=371-32_-
30.20
F*Odh499 02/15/7Q 2.40 SCOTT CTY CEN,$ER' ' GEN.SUPPLIES
-- -. - _ ---- --- -- 2 --- _�_._—.
0461.30u 02/15/79 9,014.40 STANDARD OIL MOTOR FUELS _ 01-4222.421.42 18631
***kA* ***•CKS
04650'4 (12/15/79 4,103.39 SPRINGSTED INC PROF. SERVICES 55-4315-911-91
4,103.39
L1
15.00
---------------
046,344 ud/15/79 114.140 UNION 76 MOTOR FUELS 01-4222.421-42 2172
046SII�7 771577q-- - - - -----f.00- _ —IjnIn -7 --- - - _--- _- -VEHICLE M itWT -- --_ 141-423 -331=33
116.40
b575-----�s77i57T4—`-----5�i;0�— --���—_-------------�Cii3�L ---------- --.. ��:4���._�.�`12 —.—_.._____---------• l
Ou6545 '42/15/79 18.00 U OF M SCHOnL 01-4390-141.14 214
7 J
72.00
A*kkkA ***-CKS
-bs6---- GE9;4UPPLIFS--- -u�
. 046556 �??/15/79 44.70 VALLEY INb.PROPANE r.EN.SUPP1.tF1 ni+4220-63Q-b2 6765
47.70 * _..- - ----__ .. --•-- . _.__.
1979 L I T Y (IF SHAKOPEE CHECK REGISTER 07 Po 70 PAGF A
CHECK NO. UATF AMOUNT VENnOP ITEM DF8CRlPTjnN ACCOUNT NO. TNV. # P:o: m -Emgarr
***.CKS
006577 02/15/79 18.15 WOODLAKE SANITATION TRASH PICK UP 01-4373-181-18
0'16577 02/I5/79 26,88 WOODLAKE SANITATION TRASH PICK UP 01:4373-311:31
0 6577 02/15/79 15.13 WOOOLAKE SANITATION TRASH PICK UP 01-4173-321-12
646577- X2/15779*- ofv ---- --- -- ---
73-421-42
04x,577 02/15/79 26:88 WOODLAKE SANITATION TRASH PICK UP 4373-627-62
04hb77 112/15/79 6,323.40 V40ODLAKE SANITATION TRASH PICK UP
0065RS (-2/15/79 123.51 MONTGOMERY WARDS GEN.SUPPLIFS 01-4220-421-42
04603tk3 02/15/79 53.95 MONTGOMERY WARDS GEN.SUPPLIES 01-4220-441-44
04f,5PX_"-'_ j IS -il R6-s tL?FT RIND--
333.9 7
***-MKS
046601 02/15/79 116.88 ZIEGLER INC EQLJIP.MAINT 01-4230-421-A2 19394
04 JS b 2 P2/15/70 173.30 ZEP MFG..,
173.30
6 To-APT.-I f VU k U_Ti TOTAL---
97.42 FUND 13 TOTAL
- 3,500.00 .--FUND 22 TOTAL
$0.00 FUND—1-2—TOTAL
7,820.01 FUND 55 TOTAL
3,730.52 FUND Sl TOTAL
04,676.12 TOTAL
D"k 8'i T ACCOUNT____ CREDIT P,CCOUNT AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR _ C_HECK AM_T_ . CH F:
T' C.►
BILLS PAID IN FEBRUARY BUT CHARGED AGAINST 1978 BUDGE _ � � D
01.4230.321.32 01.1010.000.00 10.00 Equip. Maint. Air Comm 10.00
01.4315.361.36 " " 87.61 Prof. Services Adams Pest Control 87.61
01.4512.151.15 it It 142.88 Cap-Off. Equip. Business Equip. 142.88
01.4511.421.42 " it 9,465.00 Cap-Equip. Hayden-Murphy 9,465.00
01.4312.411.41 " " 258.25 Eng. Services Instant Testing 258.25
01.4220.441.44 if 1.20 Gen. Supplies Lano Implement 1.20
01.4511.411.41 it 1,572.38 Cap-Equip. Motorola 29397.38
01.4511.421.42 it 825-00 it
01.4230.621.62 " " 14.54 Equip. Maint. Motor Parts 14.54
01.4383.121.12 " " 218.02 Off. Equip. Rental Pitney Bowes 218.02
01.4350.121.12 " " 404.09 Legal Not. Pub. Shakopee Valley Pub. 434.20
54.4350.911.91 54.1010.000.00 12.62 "
55.4350.911.91 55.1010.000.00 17.49 it
01.4220.421.42 01.1010.000.00 28.43 Gen. Supplies Shanus Truck Line 28.43
01.4222.311.31 if it 106.78 Motor fuels Supermaerica 106.78
81.4929.911.91 81.1010.000.00 882.43 Surcharge Remit. State Treasurer 882.43
41.4315.911.91 41.1010.000.00 687.00 Prof. Services Scherer Tree Service 762.00
13.4315.911.91 13.1010.000.00 75.00 "
01.4394.121.12 01.1010.000.00 135.00 Books West Pub. 135.00
01.4315.121.12 it it 88.50 Prof. Services Brennen & Assoc. 88.50
01.4314.171.17 if it 22285.00 Planning Isberg, Riesenberg 21285.00
01.4220.421.42 it it 379.80 Gen. Supplies Old Dominion Brush 379.80
211197.02 21,197.02
Fund 01 19,522.48 Fund 54 12.62
Fund 13 75.00 Fb:iu 5 5 17.49.
Fund 41 687.00 Fund 81 882.43
211197-02
DEBIT ACCOUNT CREDIT ACCOUNT AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOi< C}iEC:_K AM7 _ CH1: r ==
February 202 1979 Handwritten Bills
01.4391.141.14 01.1010.000.00 92.50 Dues AIREA 92.50
01.4210.121.12 it it 48.46 Off. Supplies Amsterdam PrintinZ 48.46
01.4392.141.14 it it 8.00 License Fees Board of Assessors 8.00
01.4391.411.41 it it 28.00 Subscription Construction Bulletin 28.00
71.4315.977 .91 71.1010.000.00 481.84 Prof. Services Clear Water Research 481.84
01.4511.421.42 01.1010.000.00 130.64 Cap-Equip. Crysteel Dist. 130.64
01.4390.311.31 it " 124.00 School John Flynn 656.50
01-4330-311-31 " " 532.50 Travel expense
01.4232.421.42 it " 35.00 Vehicle Maint. Hwy. 101 Auto Salvage 35.00
01.4220.311.31 it " 105.95 Gen. Supplies Kapak Corp. 105.95
01-4220-321-32 it " 10.60 It Mark Klein 10.60
01.4390.111.11 it 48.00 Conference League of Mn. Cities 48.00
01.4391.411.41 " " 50.00 Dues MN. Soc. of PE 50.00
01.4390.151.15 " " 30.00 School MN. Assn.Urban Mgt.Asst. 30.00
01.4391.621.62 " " 20.00 Dues Mn. Pk.Sup.Assn. 20.00
01.4392.421.42 " " 14.00 License State of Mn. 14.00
01.4232.321.32 " " 126.57 Vehicle mAint. Manders Diesel 126.57
01.4220.441.44 " " 39.00 Gen. Supplies MA Associates 80.66
01.4220.311.31 " " 20.83 it
Ol. 4220-321-32 ►r „ 20.83 it
01.4990.321.32 " " 30-23 Misc. Peter Robarge 30.23
01.4394.311.31 " ►' 5.50 Pamphlets Sup. of Doc. 5.50
01.4230.311.31 " " 11.00 Equip. Maint. Streamlight, Inc. 11.00
O1.4230.311.31 " " 31.50 . " Tele-Terminals
31.50
DEBIT ACCOUNT CREDIT ACCOUNT -- AMOUNT BATUI RF:.MiARKS VENDOR CH�:CY. -AMT. C}(I
_ _. , ------A . -
February 20, 1979 Bills Page 2
01.4391.311.31 01.1010.000.00 5.00 Dues Washington Cty.Sheriff- 5.00
22.4315.196.19 22.1010.000.00 303.40 Prof. Services Von Klug & Assoc. 303.40
3,493.35 3,493.35
Fund 01 2,70$.11
Fund 22 303.40
Fund 71 481.84
3,493.35
MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Car Allowance - City Engineer
DATE: February 15 , 1979
When we hired the City Engineer we discussed having either a
car allowance or a City car. At that time it was Bo ' s preference
to have a City car and therefore we have not given hia. a car
allowance to date with the understanding that when he moved to Shakopee
he would get the full use of a City vehicle .
He has now been delayed in his moving plans longer than he
expected and has requested to go on a car allowance until he does
move . If and when he does move to Shakopee , he would still prefer
the City car and the car allowance would end.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize a car allowance
of $100 per month for the City Engineer. This is the same amount
granted to the Chief of Police and I believe an adequate amount
based on his usage .
DSR/jsc
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
r kl 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
MEMO
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator
SUBJECT: SAC Rebates
DATE:_ February 15 , 1979
Attached is an explaination of the recent rebates in SAC
issued to several of our neighboring cities (Chaska &
Savage) . We were not included because we do have MWCC
interceptors in Shakopee (the VIP) .
DSR/jiw
Attachment
Business Item "J"
ME T R O P O L I T A N W A S T E C 0 N T R 0 L C 0 M M I S S I O N
350 Pietro Square Building, Saint Paul, ,Minnesota 55101
222-8423
MEMORANDUM December 11, 1978
SUBJECT: Compliance with Minnesota Supreme Court Order - City of Brooklyn Center
et al, Plaintiffs, vs. Metropolitan Council, MWCC, et al, Respondents
(SAC Lawsuit)
During October, 1972, after a 9-month intensive joint study and Public meetings,
the Metropolitan Council and Metropolitan Seer Board approved and adopted a new
method for allocation and collection of Reserve Capacity Charges. This new method of
allocation is referred to as S.A.C. (Service Availability Charge) and provides that
the allocation of reserve capacity for treatment works and interceptors among
municipalities will be based on annual sewage flow to be discharged into the system
from new sewer connections and/or new building construction during each budget year.
The SAC unit charge is applicable to each 100,000 gallons of annual sewage volume and
was established as follows: $275 for 1973; $300 for 1974; $325 for 1975; $350 for 1976;
and $375 for 1977. This policy was adopted by the Council and Board and is attached
as Exhibit "A". The time period for this policy was for 5 years which was subject to
review Prior to December 31, 1977.
During the 1978 budget approval period, the SAC method of allocating reserve capacity
was extended for a two year period and SAC unit charge was established at $400 for
1978 and $425 for 1979.
Shortiv after the SAC concept and its policies of allocating Reserve Capacity Charges
were adopted, the City of Brooklyn Center along with approximately 30 other
municipalities took legal action against the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan
Sewer Board. The Plaintiffs argued that the SAC system of allocating Reserve Capacity
was arbitrary and unreasonable and contrary to legislative intent and statutes.
Approximately one year later, the District Court, in December, 1973, determined that
the SAC concept of allocating Reserve Capacity was proper and authorized by the Sewer
Act. During February, 1974, this Court further ruled that the SAC concept was reasonable.
The Plaintiffs then appealed the District Court determination to the Minnesota Supreme
Court. The brief filed by the Plaintiff is attached and identified as Exhibit "B" .
The Commission's brief to the Supreme Court is attached and identified as Exhibit "C".
The Minnesota Supreme Court's original decision is attached and identified as Exhibit "D".
The Commission took issue with the Supreme Court's original decision and filed with
the Supreme Court a Petition for Rehearing which is attached and identified as
Exhibit "E". The disagreement which states that the "Boards reserve capacity cost
allocation policy and the application of the statute to Maple Plain clearly indicates
the authority to allocate interceptor reserve capacity costs. Furthermore, the statutes
do not reruire that a local unit of government must be using an interceptor before it
can be allocated reserve capacity costs and that it is reasonable as to Maple Plain that
interceptors now exist which may have been designed to serve and are intended to serve
maple Plain and payment for excess reserve capacity costs are now required." Plaintiffs
then filed with the Supreme Court a response to the Commission's petition for rehearing
which is identified as Exhibit "F".
Business Item "J"
Page 2
M E M O R A N D U M
On May 6, 1976, the Minnesota Supreme Court issued its final Order on this matter
which is identified as Exhibit "G". A portion of the Court Order provides that-
"No local unit of government within a given sewer service area is required to
pay interceptor reserve capacity charges until it is determined by the Board
that, during the budget year in question, a specified quantum of unused capacity
in one or more service area interceptors has been reserved for the benefit of
such local unit of government. "
The Court further directed:
"Our review of the record does not demonstrate to us that any such reservation
of unused interceptor capacity was made for the village of Maple Plain during
the period in question. Accordingly, we reverse as to Maple Palin and remand
to the district court for the purpose of evaluating what sum of money paid by
Maple Plain under these circumstances should be returned to that village with
appropriate interest. "
A series of meetings has been held since the decision of the Court with Legal Counsels
of the Conmission and City of Maple Plain. The staff has prepared a proposed formula
relating to the allocation of Reserve Capacity costs that is acceptable to the City
of Maple Plain and it is further anticipated that the District Court will concur with
the proposed settlement formula in accordance with the Minnesota Supreme Court
directive and order.
The Court, in effect, has ordered that the SAC charge, which includes debt service
for treatment works and interceptors, be apportioned between treatment works and
interceptors and that the SAC charge be applied to the City of Maple Plain which
includes debt service for treatment works only. In addition, in complying with
the Court Order, there exists within the Metropolitan Disposal System eight other
rrnunicinalities similar to Maple Palin that do not have interceptor service at the
present time. Those municipalities include Bayport, Chaska, Cottage Grove, Hastings,
Medina, Savage, Stillwater and Farmington. The City of Farmington has been provided
interceptor service effective January 1, 1975. In order to apply the allocation of
reserve capacity costs on a uniform basis to all municipalities, it is reccumended that
these municipalities who were not cited by the Supreme Court Order be treated in the
same manner as the City of Maple Plain.
The proposed formula uses as its base the 1973 debt service costs for reserve capacity
for Treatment Works and Interceptors to Total Reserve Capacity Costs. The resultant
percent factor would be applied to the 1973 SAC unit charge of $275 which then
establishes the special SAC charge for municipalities who do not receive interceptor
service. The calculation is as follows:
Business Iten "J"
Page 3
MEMORANDUM
Reserve Capacity Debt Service Amount Percent
Treatment V7orks $1,632,972 27.3%
Interceptors 4,339,425 72.7%
TOTAL $5,972,397 100.0%
1973 SAC unit charge $275 (Treatment works 27.3% = $75.00)
(Interceptors 72.7% = $200.00)
The Standard SAC unit charge has increased by $25.00 each year since 1973. It is
proposed that this special SAC unit charge also be increased each year on a uniform
increment basis. For the period 1973 through 1978, the average debt service percentage
applicable to treatment works is 36.5%, therefore, 36.5% of $25.00 = $9.13 or say
$10.00 increase each year. It is recommended that the special SAC unit charge be
established at $75.00 with a $10.00 annual incremental increase as follows:
$75 for 1973; $85 for 1974; $95 for 1975; $105 for 1976; $115 for 1977; $125 for
1978; and $135 for 1979. It is further recommended that the Supreme Court directive
be applied to all municipalities that are not being served by interceptor service.
The net financial effect of this Court Order recruires refunding to the nine indicated
} municipalities a total sum of approximately $939,061 for the years 1973 through 1977.
In addition, the estimated refund for 1978 (10 months) is $183,975, or an estimated
total refund of $1,123,036.
A review of the SAC Reserve Fund indicates a balance of $4,473,268.66 as of December 31,
1977. It is further estimated that the 1978 fiscal year will result in an addition
of $3,170,000.00 to the SAC Reserve Fund resulting in an estimated fund balance of
$7,643,268.00 as of December 31, 1978. It should be noted that the $3,000,000 transfer
in 1973 to the SAC Fund is included in this total. The proposed refund to the
affected municipalities will not have any severe financial impact on the SAC Reserve
Fund. The proposed refund is equal to approximately 16% of the estimated fund balance
as of December 31, 1978.
This matter will require approval by the Metropolitan Council. Upon approval of the
C n-nission and the Metropolitan Council, refunds should be made for the years 1973
through 1977 as indicated in the attached Exhibit "H". Refunds for the 1978 fiscal
year will be made on or before April 1, 1979. Municipalities that do not have inter-
ceptor service should be advised of the Special SAC unit cnarge for 1979 of $135.00.
On October 3, 1978, Mr. Richard J. Schieffer, Schieffer & Carson, Ltd. , Legal Counsel
for the City of Maple Plain, transmitted his letter along with a City Council Resolution
(Exhibit "I") agreeing to the proposed Court ordered settlement.
In addition, this entire matter and related exhibits have been reviewed by Chairwoman
Lukermann and Carol Flynn, Chairperson of the B, F & P Carynitte, along with Mr. Tom
Hay, Dorsey, Windhorst, Hannaford, Whitney & Halladay, Legal Counsel for the Commission.
The Legal and Administrative staffs of the Metropolitan Council have also been apprised
of this matter. It is anticipated that upon approval by the Commission, the Physical
Development Committee and Metropolitan Council will review and take appropriate action
at their regular meetings during January, 1979.
Business Item "J"
Page 4
R E C O M M E N D A T I O N
It is recommended that the Con-mission approve an amendment to the Policy on
Reserve Capacity Charges as required by the Court Order; authorize the refunding_
of SAC charges to the COUnunities of Bayport, Chaska, Cottage Grove, Hastings,
Maple Plain, Medina, Savage, Stillwater and Farmington in accordance with the
formula proposed in this r.enurandum and as directed and ordered by the .Minnesota
Supreme Court; that the special SAC unit charge for 1979 for municipalities that
are not provided interceptor service be established at $135.00• and that this Court
ordered settlement is subject to the approval of the District Court and the
Metropolitan Council.
VR-ird . gherty, Chef i trator
RJD:ACG•od
RECEIVED
FEB 1 4 1979
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Il
Business Item "J"
M E T R O P O L I T A N W A S T E C O N T R O L C O M M I S S I O N
350 Netro Sc_n=e Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
222-3423
RESOLUTION NO. 78-353
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING COMPLIr,NCE WITH
MM�1NES(7TA S(PRA^E COURT ORDER N THE
. R OF THE SAC L:AI SUIT
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Metropolitan Waste Control ConTcdssicn approves an
amendment to the Policy on Reserve Capacity Charges as reaui.red by the 'Ii=,esota
Supreme Court Order; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Commission hereby authorizes the refunding of
Service Availability C,harces (SAC) to the co=. unities of Bayport, Chaska, Cottage
Grove, Hastings, 'Maple Plain, Mte-3ina, Savage, Stillwater and FarmLington in
accordance with the proposed formula and as directed and ordered by the 't=-esota
Supreme Court; and
BE IT FLTC71-:ER RESOL'v7ED, That the Special SAC unit charge for 1979 for municipalities
that are not prcvided L--:terce.tor service be established at $135.00; and
( BE IT FURTNTR RESOU,7ED, That this Court ordered settlement is subject to the approval
of the District Court and the Metropolitan Council.
Adopted this 19th day of December, 1978
MET R 0 P 0 L I T A N WASTE C 0 N T R 0 L C 0 M MI SS ION
By By
Barbara L. Lukermann, Chair.,�man Richard J. Dougherty, Chief Acmiristrazcr
ACG:ai
HUI ES S'L< ,.li tiUC CUMiU' TELL IAA STING
2-12-79
Meeting called to order at 8:15 Y.N. by Chairman flay Siebenaler
Attendance: Kay Siebenaler Bill hermerskirchen
Hon Weiler August Dellwo
Jiro Haduenz George Hies
Fred Kerber
There were no minutes of the previous meeting...
Jon Erickson and Bo Spurrier presented their feasibility report
The committee made no rectciw,iendations regarding the topics of roadway,
curb and gutter, turf restoration, sanitary sewer and storm sewer.
After much discussion on the topic of sidewalks - it was moved by Hon
Weiler, seconded by George flies that the didewalk between 9th and 10th
avenues NOT be constructed as proposed. Motion carried.
It was also moved by Jim Aaduenz, seconded by George Hies that the cost
of replacing any and all sidewalks between 1st and 9th avenues be paid
by the City of Shakopee rather than by the homeowners or business places
on Hodanes Street. lotion curried.
After some discussion on the topic of wateru"ins - it was moved by George
Ries, seconded by Jim Aaduenz that the Shakopee Public Utilties Commission
pay the entire cost of installing a new proposed watermain between 2nd and
5th avenues. Motion carried.
WilerAerber moved to adjourn. Motion carried.
James W. Haduenz
Secretary.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
FEASIBILITY REPORT
REHABILI'T'ATION OF HOLMES STREET
Ist AVENUE TO 10th AVENUE
Nk1AAA1kY
Prdpared by :
Approved Ko Submittal
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Title Page No .
I Introduction 1
II Roadway 1_2
III Curb and Gutter 3
IV Sidewalk 4
V Turf Restoration 5
VI Watermain 5-6
VII Sanitary Sewer 7-9
VIII Storm Sewer 9
IX Recommendation 10
REHABILITATION OF HOLMES STREET
1st Avenue to 10th Avenue
INTRODUCTION
Holmes Street is one of the oldest and heaviest used
residential streets in Shakopee . It serves as a link between
North and South sides of urbanized Shakopee . The present
condition of Holmes Street warrants for certain improvements
to be made . Pursuant to the recommendation of the Holmes
Street Ad Hoc Committee , City Council ordered the City
Engineering Department to investigate the feasibility of
reconstructing Holmes Street . This preliminary report covers
roadway, curb and gutter, sidewalk, watermain, sanitary sewer
and storm sewer.
ROADWAY
Holmes Street has the Minnesota Department of Transporta-
tion classification as a minor arterial street . Minnesota
Department of Transportation (MDOT) has a maximum projected
average daily traffic count of 7720 vehicles between 1st and
2nd and 6800 vehicles between 2nd and Shakopee Avenue . The
current condition of Holmes Street is deficient in structure
and is rapidly deteriorating . Holmes was originally graded to
fourty-four feet in the early 1900' s and then was surfaced in
1929 with fourty-four feet of bituminous , which is the present
status .
Recommended design criteria for Holmes would have the
road designed to be a 9 ton full depth asphalt pavement . The
-2-
roadway width is proposed to be a fourty-four foot wide urban
design which would include curb and gutter . Fourty-four feet
will allow for two driving lanes not divided and two parking
lanes . The new roadway will provide for a considerable reduction
in maintenance costs and serve as a central link between the
North and South sides of urbanized Shakopee .
- J
PROPOSED DESIGN
Le
99 �
I
.1 i
i
i
1�2 u OF X39 WCAkINI, COLAWA
--- 7' of 2331 by SE COURSE
8� ± SULSCUT FOR COMPACTION A', kt:QMV4CD
-3-
CURB AND GUTTER
Holmes Street presently has three ( 3 ) different types of curbing .
I . DIRT BANK CURB
2 . HIGH BACK CURB
3 . B-6-18 CURB AND GUTTER
Of these three (3) types of curbe , the B-6-18 curb and gutter is
recommended and the most effective .
PROPOSED DESIGN
B-6-18 Curb and Gutter
1/Z"R 6" 3"R'
1:3 8wor
i 3" R. Use 2-5/8"Radius
= R •. for 4" Curb
$ DESIGN R
•� 3ra`
There is approximately 3080 linear feet of high back curb on
Holmes . This curb varies from a height of 2" all the way to 13" .
In the areas where the curb is only 2" , storm water exceeds the
height of the curb and the curb doesn' t serve as an obstacle for
cars . In areas where the curb is 13" high, people are faced with
many inconveniences . When parking cars , the high back curb prevents
passenger doors from being opened , and presents difficulties for
people stepping up or down from the curb . The high back curb makes
use of a bituminous gutter . With a bituminous gutter and a concrete
curb, maintenance problems increase because the curb and gutter
shift independently of each other. The gutter carries runoff and
any voids between the curb and gutter allows for water to penetrate .
Water penetration will lead to curb and pavement failure .
-4-
Holmes Street has 1860 feet of B-6-18 curb and gutt(•r . h1„sc „1
this curb and gutter is in fair to poor condition. The life expectancy
of the road is to be 25 years and the existing B-6-18 curb will. not
last that long . Much of the existing curb will have to be removed
to meet any grade changes that occur in the road .
SIDEWALK
Holmes Street is a central link between the North and South sections
of the urbanized city . Both sides of Holmes Street have sidewalk from
1st Avenue to 8th Avenue . From 8th Avenue to 10th Avenue there is
approximately 1400 feet that has no sidewalk.
A preliminary survey was conducted and sidewalk from 2nd Avenue to
8th Avenue was studied . Sidewalk that is in poor condition was so designate
The sidewalk that has been designated will be removed and replaced at
the discretion of the Project Engineer . The replacement of sidewalk
will match that which was removed in width.
The area from 8th Avenue to 10th Avenue that has no sidewalk will be
designated for sidewalk. The style of sidewalk that is proposed is 4”
deep by 5 feet in width. The sidewalk will have a slope of one fourth
inch per foot and slope towards the road. A distance of five (5) feet
will be maintained from the back of the curb to the edge of sidewalk.
This area is required for snow storage from street plowing . In areas
where trees are in the way, every possible effort will be made to
i
route the sidewalk around the tree .
The stretch of sidewalk from 8th Avenue to 10th Avenue will have
a minimum setback of 13 ' from the residence of 940 S . Holmes . The
setback for the remaining homes is approximately 30 feet , which is a
normal distance between a home and a sidewalk .
-5-
Turf Restorat ion
All areas disturbed by construction will be restored by so(ldine .
Sod has the definite advantage that it offers immediate restoration
and provides for an equal restoration to that of which was disturbed .
WATERMAIN
The City of Shakopee ' s water distribution system consists of a
gridiron network of mains known as a lateral main network. This
lateral main network generally consists of east west laterals . In
1976 a municipal water study was conducted for the City of Shakopee
by Schoell and Madson, Inc . One of the conclusions arrived at by
Schoell and Madson was the need for more North-South laterals . West
of County Road 17 there is only one watermain that is continuous from
10th Avenue to 1st Avenue , which is located on Lewis Street . Schoell
and Madsons report recommended construction of North-South lines if the
opportunity arose .
Holmes Street has a 6" watermain from 10th Avenue to 5th Avellut:
and then from 2nd Avenue to 1st Avenue . The stretch from 5th Avenue
to 2nd Avenue has no watermain.
A 6" watermain from 5th to 2nd would provide greater flows to
the downtown area and would also provide for a loop. The reason for
only a 6" main is because this line would serve primarily as a loop
line , where as anything larger would be a trunk main. This area doesn' t
require a trunk line with the 8" watermain down Lewis .
The extension of the watermain from 5th Avenue to 2nd Avenue is
the only watermain construction that can be justified and recommended
at this time .
-6—
Iq �J � k °
(.�
1 I--
Is
1 � �
I
F-1 3 •
A U w LLB
, r
e s ff �pt All-
fix Ok 6. -
-7-
SANITARY SEWER
The present sanitary sewer on Holmes Street ranges from 8" to
12" . The condition of the Holmes Street sanitary sewer ranges from
good to poor condition . The Holmes Street project is considering
reconstructing the road so all necessary sewer work for the next 20
years should be done at this time . The area that requires excessive
maintenance is from 7th Avenue to 2nd Avenue. There are four alterna-
tives to be considered for the rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer .
The four alternatives are :
I) Foaming
II ) Line Existing Line
III ) Replacement
IV) Do Nothing
Alternative I
Foaming the lines consists of injecting a foam that contains a
root killing ingredient into the line . This method has of yet not
been extensively used . Foaming has a projected life expectancy of
three (3) years . This would require that the lines would have to be
foamed every three years . Additional problems that would be encountered
by foaming would be the large number of holes that would remain in the
pipe where the roots had penetrated . With so many joints and large
concentrations of roots, this would amount to an excessive number of
holes in the pipe . Through these holes material will be able to
infiltrate. Material that has infiltrated will leave cavities around
the sanitary sewer. These cavities could lead to road and sanitary
sewer failure .
-8-
Alternative II
Lining the existing sanitary sewer pipe would consist of pulling
a liner through the existing pipe . The line from 7th Avenue to 5th
Avenue would be lined with a pipe that has an outside diameter (O.D. )
of 7 . 125 and from 5th Avenue to 2nd Avenue will have an O.D. of 8 . 625 .
The type of pipe used for sliplining has less frictional resistance
than a clay pipe . By sliplining pipe size decreases but less frictional
resistance more than makes up for the decrease in capacity. Pipe size
will not be decreased to the point where the projected flows can ' t be
handled .
Sliplining sanitary sewer pipe has some advantages and disadvantages .
The advantages with sliplining is that it is approximately $3 . 50
a foot cheaper than replacement of the existing line. Sliplining
can be done in less time which eliminates many of the inconveniences .
The disadvantages are that sliplining is a relatively new concept .
It might be hard to find contractors willing to bid on sliplining.
Holmes Street has an excessive number of services of which all would
have to be dug up in the sliplining operation, which might greatly
increase the cost of sliplining .
Alternative III
Replacement of the existing sanitary sewer with a new pipe line
is the traditional practice for sewer rehabilitation projects . If the
sanitary sewer line was to be replaced, a 10" line would be installed
from 7th to 2nd . This line would provide for capacity to handle projected
maximum flows .
Advantages to installing a new line are the procedures for
installation are well known. Life expectancy for this new line would
exceed that of the road and the quality of job that is done can be
closely monitored .
I
-9-
Alternative IV
Alternative IV is to do nothing at all . In consideration of the
present condition of the sanitary sewer , alternative IV will have to be
ruled out . The sanitary sewer condition is such that some type of
rehabilitation work has to be done .
STORM SEWER
Presently Holmes street is being served by a series of culverts
located at intersections . At the intersections of 1st Avenue and Holmes
Street there are 18" R.C .P . located on the east and west of Holmes
which runs to the river .
The present system is a location of frequent flooding and creates
numerous maintenance problems. The size of the drainage basin makes
it impractical to handle the drainage by overland flow. The system
that is proposed would consist of storm sewer pipe together with all
necessary catch basins and leads . This storm sewer system would be
connected into the one that crosses 1st Avenue . By doing this , consid-
erable expenses are eliminated . The estimated area that this storm
sewer would serve is approximately 60 acres .
-10-
RECOMMENDATIONS :
It is recommended that the project be constructed as described
herein with the following significant concepts .
1 . Holmes Street roadway construction take place from
First Avenue to Tenth Avenue .
2 . B-6-18 curb and gutter installed from First Avenue to
Tenth Avenue .
3 . Continuous sidewalk First Avenue to Tenth Avenue .
4 . Six inch (6" ) watermain loop Fifth Avenue to Second
Avenue .
5 . Sanitary sewer rehabilitation by one of two methods :
a) Slipline
b) Replacement
Intention would be to bid both and accept the lowest
responsible bid .
6 . Storm sewer from First Avenue to Tenth Avenue .
The estimated cost of the project is as follows :
Street Construction $ 250,000
Curb Construction 35 ,000
Sidewalk Construction 50,000
Watermain Construction 37 ,000
Sanitary Sewer Construction 62 ,000
Storm Sewer Construction 112, 500
SubTotal $ 546,500
Engineering Services 32 , 800
Inspection and Testing 17 ,000
Assessment and Administration 5 ,000
TOTAL $ 601 ,300
Less State and Federal Funds 362 , 500
Amount to be Assessed $ 238,800
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S . Reeder , City Administrator
RE: 208 Study
DATE: March 6 , 1979
The latest version of the 208 Study offered by the
Metropolitan Council still has several serious defects which
need to be brought out into the open.
1 . Septic Tank Inspections
The policy still requires excessive inspection main-
tenance and record keeping for rural lot sizes of less
than 5 acres . When properly controlled , these require-
ments could be moved at least down to 2� acre lots . This
requirement for 2� acre lots can not be based on
engineering requirements , but rather are probably designed
to cause economic hardship on cities or counties who
do not adhere to the recommended 1 .0 acre minimum lot
size in rural areas .
2 . Jackson Interceptor
The staff analysis indicates that "there has been
no commitment by the Council to construct an interceptor
to serve Jackson Township . Even though Jackson is
allocated a flow, no Metropolitan facility will be
constructed until they meet the appropriate criteria"
(1000 acres or . 5 mgd flow must be conveyed by an up-
stream community to qualify as a Metropolitan facility) .
A new chart has been attached which eliminates consideration
of the Jackson Interceptor. This chart indicates that the
alternative to phase out the Chaska plant and pipe the effluent
to Blue Lake by an interceptor on the south side of the Minnesota
River is an alternative that was considered in the 208 analysis
and is not to be given further consideration or study .
I have never seen this chart before and feel strongly that
it should be eliminated or the status of the Jackson Interceptor
be changed to at least allow further consideration.
DSR/jiw
Attachment
48
208 PROJECTS ALTERNATIVES FOR 201 DETAIL STUDIES
MISSISSIPPI RIVER SERVICE AREA
ST. CROIX RIDER SERVICE AREA
FACILITY NAME AND ALTERNATIVE CATEGORY* FACILITY NAME AND ALTERNATIVE
AS DESCRIBED IN 208 PLAN A 8 CATEGORY
AS DESCRIBED IN 208 PLAN
A B
ANOKA: No recomendation BAYPORT: No recommendation
I. Expand plant 1985/3.5 1993/5.2 X 1.-Expand at or near site - Bayport
2. Phase out to Metro YPort X
X 2. Phase out to Still.
3. Phase out to Fridley via r.r. route X
4• Land application X 2A. Phase out to Still. via Hwy. route X
X 3• b 3A. Phase out to Cottage Gr. or
FRIOLEY: No recommendation Hastings X
T. New plant - without Anoka - 25 mgd 4 Land application X
2. New plant - with Anoka X
' 30 mgd X STILLWATER: No recommendation
3• New interceptor to Metro X 1. Expand sludge - still. b Oak Park only
4. Land application X 2. Expand 2 site - Still., Oak Pk., Bay-
X
p
METRO: Recommend #7 and no other recommenda- 3. b3At Phase out to Cot. G. or Hastings X
tions 4. Land application X
IA. With b w.o. Anoka @ 5.2 m g d X X
2. b 2A. With b w.o. Fridley/Anoka @ 36 mgd X
LOWER ST. CROIX CITIES: No recommendation
3• b 3A. With b w.o. C.S.O. Flow X No alternat ves de ineated untl1
4. With Medina -thru Plymouth X rural area 201 is completed
5. With Tri Lakes X
6. With old Vill. of Lake Elmo X
7. With Woodbury X
8. Land application x MINNESOTA RIVER SERVICE AREA
LAKE ELMO: Recommend 03 CHASKA: No recommendation
1•ETA. Tri Lakes b old VIII. Of to Cottage 1.Expand at or near site - Chaska only
Grove or Hastings X 2. Phase out to Blue Lake - via So. side river X X
2. Tri Lakes b Vill. to Valley Branch X 3. Phase out to Blue Lake - via No.
3. Old Village land application X 4. Land application side river X
3A. Old Vill. b Tri Lakes land application X
4. Tri Lakes to Metro X
X BLUE LAKE: No recommendation
5. Old Village to Metro X Expand in 1999+
6. Old Vill. to Cimarron 2. Evaluate interceptor capacity in present X
X
WOODBURY: Recommend 42 area X
I.ETA. Intercep. to Cottage Gr. or Hastings X SAVAGE: No recommendation
2. Interceptor to Metro X 1. Expand at or near site - all of Savage X
ROSEMOUNT: No recommendation - 2. Phase out to Seneca X
I. Expand Phy/Chem Plant 1987 3. Phase out to Blue Lake X
X
2. Phase out all flow to Empire X 4. Land application X
3. Phase out P/C - construct biological X SENECA: No recommendation
4. Land application X Expand at site - after 2000
5. Present P/C and new biological X X
COTTAGE GROVE: No recommendation MAPLE PLAIN: No recommendation
1. New or exp. 2.5 mgd plant - C. G. only X • Expand at or near site X
2. New 11.8 hgd plant - Stillwater to C. G. X 2. Phase out to Blue Lake - via Orono Int. X
3. New 7.9 mgd plan - Lake Elmo to C. G. X 3• Phase out to Blue Lake - via Mound Int. X
4A. Int. C. G. only to Hastings X 4• Land application X
48. int. Stillwater to C.G. to Hastings X MEDINA: No recommendation
4C. Int L. Elmo to C. G. to Hastings X 1. Phjs0 out to Metro - via Plymouth
5. Land application X 2. Phase out to Blue Lake - via Long Lake X X
Hastings: No recommendation 3• Expand at or near site X
I Expand for Hastings only x 4• Land application X
2. Expand for Hastings b C. Grove X
3. Expand for L. Elmo to Hastings X
4. Expand for Stillwater to Hastings X Alternatovas11Considered in 108 that are acceptable for
5. Land application - Hastings only X
detailed 101 analysis
VERMILLION RIVER SERVICE AREA * Catagory "B"
Alternatives that were considered in 208 analysis and
EMPIRE are not to be given further consideration or study.
C Expand w.bw.o Rosemount in 1995 X X Other alternatives not listed are not eligible for
1. wand application X X 201 study detail.
m
9. to
71 Ot
ISE,
. .1 1 1_4
LE
rj ly_?'4�ev 9r—
IT
T 'Wag
El; y-
-TT
'r r ZE
Ml_
ap
is
OE I
IT
_Lz_
sz
tz
Ez It
3 111,,.Vlj _O(Y/5-Ohly
< < 1004
-177bl
ZZ,
02
6T' b c 'A 0.41=1V 2171 250 W C"_tw-tr 'A.071we
Fl?
CY
I
es v
-FIJIli4l
Sl!M
rA► 'gA
El
Div 11.4
6
—61 4 WW:1�74_11
-1 7
9
Of
l2d I'lly I ?T'
r
41
_j r7(v
ITI
Ov"!
V
Cu2WIE
ZI ll 01 6 tt L 9 s 1 E z
2-6 -31.J VoSl
S-rveii-i vlaW(�i -SY-PA W"y
TWIN Cl TY SECTION
1
EVENTS
3 7 i
a REGISTRATION —2nd FLOOR LOBBY
a
Beginning at 7:30 A.M.
t CONCURRENT SESSIONS
{ 8:30 A.M. — 5:30 P.M.
LUNCHEON —MENOMINEE ROOM
GOV. AL OUIE, INVITED SPEAKER
Beginning at 12:00 Noon
Presents SOCIAL HOUR — MENOMINEE ROOM
NINETEENTH ANNUAL Cash Bar P.M.
REGIONAL SYMPOSIUM
EVENING PRESENTATION
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1979 Menominee Room
6::30— 7:00 P.M.
THUNDERBIRD MOTEL — BLOOMINGTON, MINN. Speakers: Dave Benforado, 3M
2201 E.78th St. Russ Susag, 3M
Mike Bolduc, 3M
Topic: "Presentation of Special
COMMITTEE CHAIRPEOPLE Wastes Workshops Results"
David Fradin General Chairman
Environmental Balance Association DINNER — MENOMINEE ROOM
Dave Benforado, 3M Special Wastes Beginning at 7:00 P.M.
Workshops Mike Bolduc, 3M Special Wastes
Program
Jane Borowicz, Pillsbury Co. Publicity
Watson Fearing, 3M Financial
Eric Hockert, 3M Technical Program
Hubert Huls, Serco Laboratories Registration
Bill Johnson, 3M Registration
Jim Luck, Honeywell Engineer and
Society Program
Charles Noddings, 3M Publications
Don Sinner, Economics Lab Arrangements
Russ Susag,3M
Special Wastes
Panel
Matthew Tirrell, University of Student Coordinator
Minnesota
TWIN CITY SECTION
— j
i
i
,
NINETEENTH ANNUAL
REGIONAL SYMPOSIUM
; a"d
PROGRAM
SESSION I SESSION 11
"DEALING WITH SPECIAL WASTES" GENERAL AND TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS
SHOSHONE ROOM WINNEBAGO/YAKIMA ROOM
MORNING SESSION MORNING SESSION
Technical Presentations "The Chemical Engineer and Society"
Moderator—Mike Bolduc,3M Moderator—Jim Luck,Honeywell
Welcome
Welcome Don Sinner,Economics Lab
8:30 ; David Fradin,Environmental Balance Association AICHE Twin City Section Chairman
Symposium General Chairman
=Chemolite ing from an Industrial Producer's Viewpoint: Objectives of National and Local Sections of AICHE
9:00 or,Secured Landfills,3P Program. Ro bert Marshall,University of Wisconsin
,3M Company
ation in Governmental Activities
Review of the Federal "Hazardous Materials"Regulations and The Chemical Engineers'Particip
Rep.Gordon Voss, Minnesota House of Representatives
9:30 Further Plans
i
Al Corson,U.S. EPA 1
' 10:00 COFFEE BREAK COFFEE BREAK
Review of the Minnesota"Hazardous Materials"Regulations, The Employment Picture for Chemical Engineers
10:30 I Intent,and Plans Lee Ponto, IT Placement Office,University of Minnesota
Jim Kinsey, MPCA
11:00 r Operation e` a Secured Landfill Government Contracts in Fluidized Bed Coal Burning Studies
Cliff Chandler, Nuclear Engineering Corporation Robert Sirany,Fiuidyne Co.
11:30 Special Waste Handling in Minnesota Monitoring Special Wastes A Practical Approach
Robert Pojasek,Energy Resources Company Hubert Huls,Serco Laboratories,Inc.
AFTERNOON SESSION AFTERNOON SESSION
Special Waste Panel Discussion and Workshops General Technical Papers
Moderator—Eric Hockert,3M
2:00 Panel Discussion Optimization of the Ozone-Plus-Ultraviolet Radiation Process
as a Wet Oxidation Technique for the Treatment of Wastes
"Identification of Issues" 1 Containing Stable Cyanide Complexes
Moderator—Russ Susag,3M t L.L. (Tom)Altpeter,Jr. (speaker),R.H. Forester,D.B.Streeter,
A.L.Vausher,E.J.Conway,Midwest Research Institute
Panelists will include the morning speakers from Session I along Development of a Membrane to Remove Acidic Components
2:30 1 with other representatives of government,industry,and from Coal Gasification Streams
academia. Edward J.Conway,Midwest Research Institute
I
3:00 Characterization of Power Plant Flue Gas Desulfurization
Wastes.Allen F.Volesky (speaker),
H.M.Ness,Grand Forks Energy Technology Center,DOE
3:30 COFFEE BREAK COFFEE BREAK
4:00 Workshops— Let's Solve the Problem Issues Leach Tests: Successes,Failure,and Concerns
Moderator—Dave Benforado,3M Cary Perket,St.Croix Research
4:30 Here is your chance to mold the day's information into an outline of Tests of Stoker Fired Boiler for Emission Control
Problems,Solutions,and Barriers for handling special wastes in Minne- and Efficiency.
sota.Groups of 10-12 participants will focus on the main issues brought James E.Gabrielson (speaker),Peter L.Langsjoen,KV B, Inc.
out in t feel will be the y he Panel Discussion.Each workshop's output will be summarized. Fault Tree Analysis of Heat Recover Devices
5:00 In the Evening Presentation,a statement of what you
future public policy on handling special wastes in Minnesota. Paul A.Chapman,General Resource Corp.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
(DETACH ALONG LINE)
REGISTRATION FORM
AICHE — TWIN CITY SECTION — REGIONAL SYMPOSIUM
THUNDERBIRD MOTEL — BLOOMINGTON
FEBRUARY 22, 1979
Make checks payable to:
Name American Institute of Chemical Engineers
Symposium Registration $25 before Feb. 16
Company (includes luncheon and dinner) $30 day of Symposium
Address Receipts provided upon request. No refunds after February 16,
1979. Pick up tickets at registration table on February 22,
ZIP 1979.
Please indicate session preference to aid Arrangements
Committee in assigning rooms.
Pre-register now by mailing completed form and remittance Session I Session 11
before Feb. 16 to: W.C.Johnson ❑ AM ❑ AM
3M Center Bldg. 230-S 125 ❑ PM
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 El PM
NAME
ADDRESS
ZIP TELEPHONE
ORGANI7A.TION
1 . Are you interested in receiving periodic publications outlining solid and
hazardous waste meetings, conferences and other environmental activities?
YES NO
2. Has your organization scheduled future meetings relating to solid and
hazardous waste that you would like published by REEC? If yes, please
state time, date, place, any registration costs, featured speakers, and
meeting forms below: (or attach information).
3. Would you, or your organization, like to participate in a conference in
1979 focusing on the optimum technology and siting process for managing
Minnesota solid and hazardous wastes? The conference would involve govern-
ment agencies, legislators, industries and a cross section of the public
from potential site areas in the seven-county Metro area.
a. Yes, I (or my organization) would like to attend a 2-day conference
on solid and hazardous waste management.
YES NO
b. . How many persons from your organization would probably attend.
c. Would each representative be willing to pay a $20 registration fee to
defer conference costs If no, how much could you afford?
$15 $10 $5
d. What would be the best time of the year, and week days to attend such
a conference for you?
e. Which topics are you most interested in discussing and receiving
information?
S
T
A
M
P
To: METRO REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL
EDUCATION COMMITTEE
Centennial Office Building
Box 5
658 Cedar Street
St. Paul , Minnesota 55155
environmental -education council
February 5, 1979 -- - - 3
O
To: INTERESTED MINNESOTANS
.bongo From:
Metro Regional Environmental 7
Education Council `' _
P. t�
SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE PLANNING -- - -
The Metro Regional Environmental Education Council is currently reviewing
the need for solid and hazardous waste planning in Minnesota. The group
C consists of persons with a variety of professional and environmental
Interests, whose primary purpose is to develop better ways to communicate
with and involve public officials and citizens in institutional decisions
•.+.ter impacting the environment.
G'L'S
Managing solid and hazardous waste is a serious national and statewide
c�
problem. Repeated improper disposal and treatment of toxic wastes moti-
vated Congress to pass the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act in 1976.
Intent of the act is to provide a national effort to deal with wastes
from "cradle to grave, " and to utilize methods of treating wastes to
minimize adverse environmental impacts.
As part of that effort, in 1978 the Minnesota Legislature established a
Joint Legislative Committee on Solid and Hazardous Wastes and charged it
to develop recommendations for a comprehensive state waste management pro-
gram. The Committee is co-chaired by Sen. Gerald Willett and Rep. James
Casserly. It is felt that the program should address the issues of resource
recovery, hazardous waste, source reduction, and public participation.
The goal of waste management is to achieve environmentally-sound land dis-
posal of solid and hazardous wastes„
These issues will need to be evaluated in terms of various criteria:
1 . Environmental effectiveness - Can the program prevent or correct
negative environmenta an public health impacts? Can the program Ln
achieve other goals -- such as energy recovery?
2. Cost - How much will the various economic sectors be willing to pay
Tor a cleaner environment? The cost of safe treatment and disposal
of some waste will greatly increase. Will the consumer be willing
to buy products at a higher cost.? Will smaller businesses be able
to afford the high cost of some treatment methods and still remain
solvent? _.
15
3
r e MN Environmental Education Bd.
Centennial Office Building
Box 5 - 658 Cedar Street
an equal oPPorl -ufy tmpinytr St. Paul , MN 551555
February 5, 1979
MEMORANDUM
3. Administrative feasibilit - Some programs may or desirable, but realis-
tically impossi le, because of
A program to deal with these issues is being developed by the Minnesota
t State
Planning Agency in cooperation with the
Minnesota Energy Agency for the Joint Legislative Committee on Solid and
Hazardous Wastes.
The Metro Regional Environmental Education government, earnestly gbelieves that
decision-makers at all levels of govt
must keep apprised of developments regarding this issue. Inevitably, the
result will be to lrecyclinarcenter, landfill ,sorhany combinationtof�these uine
recovery facility, recycling
some area(s) of the state. The affected public will ll untoubtedly havlocalhostile
reaction to proposed sites. It may
citizen uproar over proposed sites, but it is hoped that mutual efforts can
minimize complaints that, "we weren't informed."
The issue is everyone's rSP°We,alliuse industrialaproductseandwmanyrMlnnesotans
hazardous waste byproducts.
hold jobs with industries th�tltrtoutht wastes.
desert" wilSimplistic
resolvestatements
this national
"shut industry down or stn
afford
problem. It is a complex issue binvolving
losses9 the cost1of productstrlegalorestraints,
protective measures, possible J o
and local planning. Impacts on physical , social and economic environments
are also at stake. Throughout the process ttor will toema needetoisksatoearisks
vs. benefits, (i .e. how much are we willing
able levels) .
It should be kept in mind that even with the best available technology, there
is no such thing as a 100 fil-safe an be
waste es sermanagement technology arrives. Today's technology
until the "perfect
t practices e
does produce far superior r been caused byimproperSuncontrolla
uncontrolled practices in
Many current problems have
years past, that have now surfaced. There is a need for education regarding
old practices and new techniques. Much has been
earned about siting pro-
cedures in order to minimize harmful environmental
To assist the legislature's Joint Committee on Solid and Hareri
he Metro REEC will be publishing p odic newsletters
and interested citizens, t
listing upcoming meetings and seminars addressing ttheissue
REEC will solid
alsoaorganize
hazardous waste. If there is sufficient interest,lvement in technology and site decisions
a conference focusing on public invo
for managing solid and hazardous waste.
In conclusion, we hope that you will continue to be informed of the onqoing
efforts regarding this issue in Minnesota. Please attached questionnaire us intodayesstnq
this critical problem by completing the q
Sincerely,
Kenneth Bombach
William Seeley
Members, Metro Regional Environmental Education Council
(e
0
c+ cn cD o (D Q
CO :3 x cn v
C+ J.
-0 C") CD Cn O
n) cD :3 :
C C1 0 nl L .j t/7
Zc+ O O
(n cD --h Z
cn (D O W Y
- c+ n V)
0) o?S
J J
CL m Z
� � W
XI c
0 �
n+ Q
Ct
J.
o O
V
n W
C
C1
J.
J
an open invitation
We need your views concerning O
the region's environmental ed-
ucation needs and ways to meet
them. Membership vacancies
sometimes occur so we welcome
applications at any time.
To obtain more information
about us or to request an ap-
plication form, please contact:
Metro Regional Environmental
Education Council
Box 5, Centennial Building
658 Cedar Street
St. Paul , MN 55155 c
29F-23F8 i
In 197E the legislature con- members represent the region's
cluded that one 12-member coun- diverse backgrounds and points
cil could not adequately serve of view--including business,
the densely-populated metro labor, industry, education,
area and five, seven-member government and voluntary or-
task forces were added to sup- qanizations.
port the work of the Council .
Each task force concentrates
Anoka upon the environmental educa-
Region 11 tion needs of a different seg-
:rt. ment of the community includ-
ing kindergarten-twelfth grade
teachers/students and leaders;
post secondary educators/stu-
dents, the general public, and
elected officials.
Carver
Dakota A full-time coordinator is em-
Scott ployed by the Minnesota Envi-
ronmental Education Board to
facilitate the work of the
what we do Council and its task forces in
Region 11 .
who we are We identify environmental edu-
cation needs and priorities of Activities of MEEB are reviewed
We are 42 people from the sev- the region. We communicate and funded each biennium by
en-county area including and with and facilitate cooperation the state legislature. Council
surroundin4 the twin cities. We among other agencies, organ- and task force members serve
belong to a statewide network izations, and individuals con- without pay but may be reim-
of nearly 200 volunteers who cerned with environmental ed- bursed for actual expenses re-
believe that: environmental ucation in its many forms. We lated to program activities.
issues are among our most pres- gather resources, initiate,
sinq problems. . .it is not too create, co-sponsor and encour-
late to make a difference. . . age programs and oro,iects to
education is the key to in- meet environmental education
formed environmental attitudes needs. the approach
and actions. Although we advocate education
Like 12 other Regional Environ- the Organization as a way of bringing the cit-
mental Education Councils in izens of Region 11 the infor-
the state, we were established The Metro Regional Environmen- mation needed to make sound
by the legislature in 1973 to tal Education Council is com- environmental decisions, we do
work under the authority of nosed of seven at-large members not take official positions for
the Minnesota Environmental and five task force chairper- or against particular environ-
Education Board (�IEEB) . sons. Council and task force mental policies or actions.