Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/25/1997 TENTATIVE AGENDA SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 25, 1997 LOCATION: 129 Holmes Street South Mayor Jeff Henderson presiding ADJOURNED REGULAR SESSION 1] Roll Call at 7:00 P.M. 2] Approval of Agenda 3] Continuation of public hearing on whether or not the City of Shakopee should modify the enabling resolution that created the Shakopee Economic Development Authority (EDA) to provide that the members of the City Council shall serve as the board of commissioners of the EDA - Res. No. 4610 4] New Copy Machine 5] Other Business 6] Adjourn * * * * * WORK SESSION 1] Roll Call following the adjourned regular session 2] Approval of Minutes: November 18 and 26, 1996 and January 16, 1997 3] Street Light Policy 4] Street Overlay Assessment Policy 5] Other Business 6] Adjourn CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: EDA Structure and Effectiveness DATE: January 17, 1997 INTRODUCTION: The Council is asked to discuss the effectiveness and structure of the Economic Development Authority. BACKGROUND: On February 6, 1996, the then newly elected City Council established by resolution a restructured EDA, consisting of five citizens at large, and two Councilmembers. The citizens at large were appointed to terms of six years, which have staggered ending dates. After operating for a year under the new system, Mayor Henderson has expressed concern that the format is duplicative and delays developers unnecessarily- oftentimes, the same presentation must be made to both the EDA and the City Council. For that reason, he is proposing to reconstitute the EDA membership so that the City Council alone serves as the EDA. PROCESS: The City Attorney advises that to make this change, publication must be made for two consecutive weeks notifying the public of a public hearing. The public hearing would be held, and the City Council could then modify the enabling resolution that created the Shakopee Economic Development Authority, should that be their desire after taking public input. Mayor Henderson proposes that this be done, and that a special meeting be held Thursday, February 6th; at 4:30 PM for a Public Hearing. A notice of the public hearing, and copy of a resolution which would change the membership, should that be the Council's desire, is attached. ACTION REQUIRED: If the Council wishes to make the change as proposed by Mayor Henderson, it should, by motion, call for a public hearing to be held at 4:30 PM Thursday, February 6th, to consider modifying the enabling Resolution No. 4381, relating to the EDA membership. Mark McNeil City Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 4610 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 4206 REGARDING THE CREATION OF AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BY CHANGING THE MEMBERSHIP OF GOVERNING BODY OF THE AUTHORITY WHEREAS,the City Council created the Shakopee Economic Development Authority(the "EDA) by Resolution No. 4206 approved April 4, 1995 (the "Enabling Resolution"),pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.1081 (the "EDA Act"); and WHEREAS, the Enabling Resolution initially designated a seven-member board of commissioners of the EDA, consisting of all City Council members plus two citizens appointed by the Mayor and approved by the City Council; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 4381 approved February 6, 1996, the City- Council modified the Enabling Resolution to provide that the EDA board of commissioners would consist of seven commissioners appointed by the Mayor and appro\red by the City Council, at least two of whom must be members of the City Council; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 469.092,Subd. 2 of the EDA Act,the City Council may modify the Enabling Resolution at any time; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 469.095, subd. 2(d) of the EDA Act, the Enabling Resolution may provide that the members of the City Council shall serve as the commissioners of the EDA; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined to further modify the Enabling Resolution, and on this date held a duly-noticed public hearing regarding modification of the Enabling Resolution at which all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: 1. Resolution No. 4206, A Resolution Creating an Economic Development Authority, is hereby amended by repealing paragraph 3 of the Enabling Resolution,and replacing it with a new paragraph 3. reading as follows: 3. The City Council of the City of Shakopee shall serve as the board of commissioners of the EDA. The term of EDA commissioners will coincide with their term of office as members of the City Council. A vacancy is created in the membership of the commission when a City Councilmember ends Council membership. 2. The Enabling Resolution remains in full force and effect and is not modified except as provided herein. SJBl1614S SSt155-24 3. This resolution is effective upon approval 1y the City Council. Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota this day of , 1997. Mayor Attest: City CIerk SJB116145 sRISS-24 3 272300100 City of Shakopee CLASS #203 Attention: Judy Cox 77 LINES 129 Holmes St . S. Shakopee, MN 55379-1328 203 Legal Notices NOTICE OF PUBLIC STAR TRIBUNE HEARING • a division of Cowles Media Company NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Shakopee will meet on Tuesday,Feb.25,1997 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council STATE OF MINNESOTA l Chambers in City Hall, 129 J pee, Strsot Sototc, Shako- COUNTY OF HENNEPIN SS. pub,cMinnesota,aring o to conduct ti a COUNTY 1 AFFIDAVITOF PUBLICATION public hearing a the question of modifying the enabling res- olution that created the Shako- peeAut Economic(EDevelopment pursuant to I Diane Kise,being duly sworn,on oath says she is and during all times herein stated has been an Minnesota Statutes,r Sections I! employee of the Star Tribune, publisher and printer of the newspaper, published 7 days a week,known as Star 469.090 to 469.108. i Tribune and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: Summary of Modification to the Enabling Resolution • (1)Said Newspaper is printed in the English language in newspaper format and in column and sheet The enabling resolution that form equivalent inprintedspaceleast to at 1200square inches. (2) Said newspaper and is created the EDA was approved q P Per is printed daily by the City Council on April 4, distributed at least five days each week.(3)Said newspaper has 25 per cent of its news columns devoted to news 1995 and modified on Febru- ary 6, 1996. Under the.en- of local interest to the community which it purports to serve and does not wholly duplicate any other publication. abling resolution as modified, the board of commissioners of (4) Said newspaper is circulated in and near the municipality which it purports to serve,has at least 500 copies the EDA consists of seven members appointed by the regularly delivered to paying subscribers and has entry as second-class matter in its local post office.(5) Said Mayor and approved by the City Council, at least two of Newspaper purports to serve the city of Minneapolis and vicinity in the County of Hennepin and has its known whomthe Council. The bproposed office of issue in the City of Minneapolis, in said county. (6) Said newspaper files a copy of each issue modification en Cit d es that members of th Council immediately with the State Historical Society.(7) Said newspaper is made available at single or subscription commissionersom serve as the board of prices to anyperson,partnershipor other unincorporated association requesting the news a newspaper and makingthe Theirrsas EDA the EDA. tp p p ios terms would commis- applicable payment. (8) Said newspaper has complied with all foregoing conditions for at least one year. sinners coincide with their terms as Council members. Hearing She further states on oath that the printed copy of the matter hereto attached as a part hereof was cut from the columns of the Star Tribune, and was printed and published therein in the English language,on At the publichearing aya per- the following days and dates: Monday, 10 February 1997;Monday, 17 February 1997;and that the Aon wishing to express a view regarding the modification to' the enabling resolution will be following is a printed copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z,both inclusive,and is hereby acknowledged heard orally or in writing.At the conclusion of the hearing or. as being the size and type used in the composition and publication of said notice, to wit: any adjournment thereof, the City Council will take whatever action it deems necessary with j regard to the proposed modifi- cation.A copy of the full text of I t klm ttmvx the modification to the en-j abedef ghij nopgrs yz abling resolution is on file for I public inspection in the office I of the City Clerk at City Hall during normal business hours.IoSt.. .BY ORDER OFCOUNCILt �kt s. Judith S.Cox Diane Kise City Clerk Dated:February 7,1997 subscri r: and sworn to ore m' this 17 day of February, 1997 � . Al t _, ; VICKI L HUSOME .-44 yNOTARYPUBUG-MINNESOTA . �.. My Commission ExpiresAfl.31,2000 #3 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: City Council FROM: Paul Snook, Economic Development Coordinator SUBJECT: EDA Mission Statement and Work Plan DATE: February 11, 1997 Introduction: Staff has provided the enclosed EDA Mission Statement and 1997 Work Plan as background information for the February 25th public hearing. Background: On November 13, 1996,the EDA held its regular meeting and a special work session to develop a Mission Statement and Work Plan for 1997. Based on the work session, staff prepared a revised Mission Statement and 1997 Work Plan. The EDA board unanimously approved the revised Mission Statement and 1997 Work Plan at the November 27, 1996 EDA meeting. Action Requested: No action requested at this time. This item is informational. 1 SHAKOPEE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) MISSION STATEMENT, 1997 EDA WORK PROGRAM,AND 1997-2001 WORK PROGRAM MISSION STATEMENT: The Shakopee EDA is committed to the maintenance and expansion of the local economy, the enhancement of existing community and economic resources, and the development of new community and economic resources which are consistent with both the existing and envisioned character of the City of Shakopee. Chief among the community's existing resources are; • A historic and still vital downtown; • It's location on the Minnesota riverfront; • An unparalleled tourism/entertainment attraction in ValleyFair, Canterbury Park, and the nearby Minnesota Renaissance Festival and Mystic Lake Casino; • A strong diversity of commercial and industrial businesses; • A strong diversity of available housing. In order to accomplish its goals,the Shakopee EDA may make use of any and all powers granted it under Minnesota Statutes and the City's enabling resolution. 97WKPLAN.DOC 1997 WORK PROGRAM Downtown Target Date Blocks 3 &4: Property acquisition by the City 2/1/97 Demolition 4/1/97 Development of Building/Financing plans 4/1/97 Construction 1998 Courthouse: Continue to work with Scott County on justice center Ongoing Rehab Program: Develop expanded program for TH 101 and CR 17 2/1/97 Entry Signage:Develop purpose and concept plan for entry signage into city 3/4/97 Solicit proposals with signage designs 6/1/97 Select signage design and oversee construction of signage 8/1/97 Riverfront Plan: Review existing river-front plan,modify as needed 3/1/97 Historic: Work with Chamber/CVB and Murphy's Landing on ferry project 1/1/97 Assist Murphy's Landing with Mill and other historical projects 1/1/98 Marina: Explore potential for marina/harbor/boat launching on the river 1/1/97 Explore potential for a riverboat on the Minnesota River 1/1/98 Promotion Develop information package 2/1/97 Incentive Program Adopt Policy 1/1/97 Historic Preservation Develop Community-wide inventory 2/1/97 Bluff Avenue: Develop Revitalization Plan Blocks 3 &4: Review building analysis with consideration of hist. pres. issues First Avenue: Develop plan for historical structures along First Avenue Develop programs to guide historical preservation plan 97WKPLAN.DOC Mall Expansion Centres Group: Work with Centres Group in parcel acquisition for mall expansion 1/1/97 Assist with mall expansion project on an as needed basis 1/1/98 Community Blighted Parcels: Develop policy/plan to deal with the removal of blighted structures to improve the tax base and aesthetics of the city Ongoing 97WKPLAN.DOC *Li CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Jerry Poole, Deputy Chief SUBJECT: New Copy Machine DATE: February 25, 1997 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: A police department memorandum placed before Council during it's February 18, 1997 meeting requested authorization for appropriate City staff to enter into lease and service agreements for a new photocopier. The Council asked for additional proposals before making a decision and tabled the matter until the February 25, 1997 meeting. The attached proposal reflect quotations from three firms for similar photocopiers. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Do nothing. 2. Authorize appropriate City staff to enter into lease and service contracts with American Photocopy. 3. Authorize appropriate City staff to enter into lease and service contracts with:D.C. Hey. 4. Authorize appropriate City staff to enter into lease and service contracts with CDP Imaging System. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Alternative#2 is recommended. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to authorize appropriate City staff to enter into a lease and service contract with American Photocopy for the photocopier identified in Proposal#1. Jerry Poole Deputy Chief Proposal #1 American Photocopy Toshiba 3550 Copier $177.53 per month Service/Maintenance $161.50 per month Total $339. 03 per month Proposal #2 D.C. Hey Sharp SF-2030 Copier $256. 00 per month Service/Maintenance $179. 00 per month Total $435. 00 per month Proposal #3 CDP Imaging Systems Minolta EP-3050 Copier $275.00 per month Service/Maintenance $180. 00 per month Total $455. 00 per month All three proposals are for 36 month leases and include a purchase option at the end of the lease. American Photocopy AN ALCO STANDARD COMPANY SHAKOPEE POLICE ADMINISTRATION 476 GORMAN STREET SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 ATTENTION: JERRY POOLE February 6, 1997 TOSHIBA OFFICE SYSTEM PROPOSAL STATE AND LOCAL INVESTMENT EQUIPMENT WITH TRADE-IN Toshiba 3550 Copier With Reversing Automatic Document Feeder, 20-Bin Sorter and Stand * $ 177.53 per Month V.I.P. Maintenance Agreement $ 161.50 per Month Total $ 339.03 • Leasing Program: 39 Month Toshiba Zero %Easy Lease. * 3 Months Deferred * No Advance Payments * Interest Free(Zero%)Financing * Fair Market Value Purchase Option * Valid until February 28, 1997. • V.I.P. Maintenance Agreement includes unlimited service calls, all parts including drums and fuser rollers and supplies. Excludes paper and staples. * Annual Agreement of 120,000 copies billed annually at $ 1,938.00. All overages billed at $ .017 per copy. * Includes Performance Guarantees (Repair or Replacement). * Delivery, Installation and Training- $ 125.00. Please call with any questions. Thank you, 63a4 Ili/14(64 Patrick Sunder Sales Representative AMERICAN PHOTOCOPY, INC. 6300 BURY DRIVE•EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55346•TELEPHONE(612)934-4384•FACSIMILE(612)934-1417 N. [EU AN ALCO STANDARD COMPANY SHAKOPEE POLICE DEPARTMENT Copier Proposal February 19, 1997 Propose: Sharp SF-2030 Copier, including • 30 copies per minute • Reversing automatic document feeder • Automatic duplex unit • (2) 500-sheet paper drawers • 50-sheet bypass • 20-bin sorter • 50-200%reduction/enlargement Purchase Price $7,199.00 36-Month FMV Lease $ 256.00/month SERVICE/ SuPPUEs: Includes all black toner, black developer, parts, labor and drums on all emergency or preventive maintenance calls. Plus, all Security Blanket guarantees are included. 1. D. C. Hey guarantees your equipment to perform to manufacturer's specifications as long as you own it,or we will replace the equipment at no charge. 2. Guaranteed four-hour service response or 5%credit. 3. Guaranteed trade-in schedule to insure optimal trade-up allowance of your present equipment. 4. All parts and supplies are guaranteed to be Sharp, not generic. 5. Free delivery of all supplies. 6. Risk-free guarantee (We perform or you don't pay). $0179/copy; 10,000 copy minimum ESTABLISHED 7948 • IMAGING SYSTEMS Copy MOW")P0.ME_ 6 Ceder Avenue SoaC t.Wirmazamds,ItAN 5542''.54/51 Mt 21 661 4665 S AM:WM POLICE DEPARTMENT A "ELATION: JERRY POOLE • COPiER PROPOSAL February 24, 1997 PROPOSE:Minolta EP 3050 CS-Pro Series Copier * 35 Copies per minute Reversing Automatic Document Feeder * Automatic Duplex Unit * Dual Drawer(500 Sheets each) * 20-Bin Sorter • • Purchase Price $ 7,599.00 36 Month FMV Lease $ 275.00 per month SERVICE AND SIMPLIES& Includes all parts,labor and drams. Also includes all black developer and black toner. $ .018 per copy for a minimum of 10,000 copies per month. • hN e:Cr'ti OPPOPrrrerrr:Arernwwrtrs w*flCM C4 ALQi;'A CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: New Copy Machine DATE: February 21, 1997 Bid quotes for this item were not available at the time of mailing. This item will be placed on the table. Sa_} Proposed Community Development Commission A five person citizen advisory body charged with seeking out specific projects and developing plans/concepts to enhance Shakopee's economic growth and community image. All projects and plans shall be designed to promote and support existing businesses, industries and residents as well as attracting new commercial investment and residents to Shakopee. Initial Specific Charges: Within 1 year bring the EDA/City Council a realistic short-term (3 year) concept plan for the downtown/101 corridor. As part of that plan, propose at least one new project to be initiated in 1998. Special emphasis should be placed on identifying blighted or urgent need areas. Within 18 months present a long term (4 -10 years) community enhancement plan with goals, timelines, preliminary funding requirements, and possible funding sources. Aggressively work with the citizens, businesses, civic and professional organizations, other city commissions and boards, government agencies and public entities to generate enthusiasm, support, and funding for projects. Monitor and advise the EDA/City Council on status of projects and plans on no less than a quarterly basis. The Commission shall also meet annually with the EDA/City Council, in joint session, to establish and modify this charge. Staff support for this body would primarily consist of the Economic Development Coordinator with additional support provided by the Community Development Director when appropriate. The President of the EDA shall also appoint one EDA commissioner to act as a non-voting liaison to provide information and policy guidance. Term of appointment shall be 2 years. Term of appointed for 3 of the initial members shall be 3 years to allow that no more than 3 members shall be up for reappointment at the same time. The commission shall meet no less than once per month. Funding for this commission shall be budgeted annually by the EDA and all expenditures reviewed and approved by the EDA. TENTATIVE AGENDA SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 25, 1997 LOCATION: 129 Holmes Street South Mayor Jeff Henderson presiding ADJOURNED REGULAR SESSION 1] Roll Call at 7:00 P.M. 2] Approval of Agenda 3] Continuation of public hearing on whether or not the City of Shakopee should modify the enabling resolution that created the Shakopee Economic Development Authority(EDA) to provide that the members of the City Council shall serve as the board of commissioners of the EDA - Res. No. 4610 4] New Copy Machine 5] Other Business 6] Adjourn WORK SESSION 1] Roll Call following the adjourned regular session 2] Approval of Minutes: November 18 and 26, 1996 and January 16, 1997 3] Street Light Policy 4] Street Overlay Assessment Policy 5] Other Business 6] Adjourn OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 18, 1996 Mayor Henderson called the meeting to order at 4:35 P.M. with Councilmembers DuBois, Sweeney, and Link present. Councilor Zorn was absent. Also present: Mark McNeill, City Administrator; Gregg Voxland, Finance Director, Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director, and Bruce Loney, Public Works Director/City Engineer. Sweeney/Link moved to approve the minutes of September 9, and October 14, 1996. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. McNeill explained that the filling of the Economic Development Coordinator position has been on hold while the Community Development Director was being hired. The Economic Development Coordinator position is a full time position which was included in the budget for 1996. The Administrative Assistant position was also included in next years budget. He said that Paul Bilotta, former employee, has inquired about current job opportunities. Paul has computer skills which we need that are currently being performed by outside vendors, as well as Economic Development experience. Mr. McNeill recommended that a position entitled "Director of Economic Development and Special Projects" be created, should Mr. Bilotta be available. He also provided a proposed job description showing 75% of the work involving the Economic Development duties and the remainder of time involving transit issues and M.I.S. systems. The City currently contracts with a variety of vendors; however, scheduling has been a problem and it creates an expense. The creation of this position would divide other portions of the previous Assistant City Administrator job descriptions into other positions. By doing this, the Administrative Assistant and the Economic Development Coordinator positions could be consolidated into a single position. $42,000 was budgeted for the Economic Development Coordinator and $28,000 for the Administrative Assistant, and several thousand dollars in consulting computer fees. He explained that if the position was re-advertised as proposed, it is unlikely a more qualified candidate would be found. A discussion ensued as to legal requirements for external advertising of this position, and a recommendation was made to advertise externally within the local framework. Mayor Henderson discussed the advantages and disadvantages of contracting for computer services and expressed concern for maintenance support, which has discontinued since the departure of Paul Bilotta. He added that a potential catastrophic breakdown is not budgeted for. A discussion ensued relating to the amount of money the Council wishes to spend on an Economic Development Director. Mr. McNeill explained the importance of the availability of someone to respond and added that there are conflicts between the responsibilities of the Economic Development Coordinator and the Economic Development Director. Mr. McNeill said that this is one of the reasons that if Mr. Bilotta is chosen this would be a function within the Administration Department. Official Proceedings of the November 18, 1996 Shakopee City Council (Worksession) Page -2- To emphasize the advantage of not having to contract for computer support, Mr. Sweeney explained the advantage of having Mr. Bilotta's expertise almost two years ago when the computer system crashed, adding that had he not been able to repair the system the City would have had to pay a very large amount of money to a contractor. A discussion ensued regarding metro-wide advertising for this position and the necessity for a full time M.I.S. consultant. A discussion ensued as to how to cost effectively provide the service without a full time consultant for potential catastrophic events, a step 2 salary, and the role of the Economic Development Coordinator. Mr. Sweeney said that a number of functions have been carried out by various staff as there has not been a designated person in that area. He explained that the City Administrator has a large number of issues to deal with and it is the Council's responsibility to implement Mr. McNeill's request for assistance in carrying out assigned functions. He added that the Council had previously agreed to supply additional staff as needed. Mayor Henderson explained that the Economic Development Authority needs an additional person and that Mr. McNeill also needs an assistant in order to function properly. He said the inclusion of the M.I.S. position would be a savings and a benefit to the city. Sweeney/Link moved to direct staff to prepare the appropriate action with respect to the recommendation to advertise metro-wide for the position of the Director of Economic Development and Special Projects for consideration at the November 19th City Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Link moved to direct staff to present the related job description for the position of Director of Economic Development and Special Projects to the Council for action at the November 19th meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. McNeill explained that the departure of the former Assistant City Administrator resulted in a re-evaluation of the City's personnel function. He discussed options for "recentralizing" personnel duties. One option related to what had been done recently and the other to what had been done prior to 1992. Internal and external equity as they relate to points were also discussed. Mr. McNeill explained that in Savage, the City Administrator is responsible for labor negotiations and the Assistant City Administrator does all hiring functions. However, they are considering contracting that function through Scott County, as Shakopee has been doing. He explained that staff had been directed to see what the job responsibilities were of Ms. Remer. He added that due to a change in title change and job responsibilities, Ms. Remer's comparably worth points were dropped Official Proceedings of the November 18, 1996 Shakopee City Council (Worksession) Page -3- to 61. It is because of this reduction in points that she has been "frozen" at an annual salary of $37,945 since 1992. Mr. McNeill explained that should job responsibilities be reassigned, Ms. Remer would be the logical person to have responsibilities such as payroll, salary adjustments, and the development and evaluation of the employee benefits program assigned. A discussion ensued regarding Ms. Remer's "frozen" salary and reduced comparable worth points. It was explained that some of Ms. Remer's job responsibilities were distributed to other departments and rather than reduce her salary it was frozen until inflation and/or the cost of living caught up. A discussion ensued regarding assignment of point values and the purpose of the payroll plan and criteria. Mr. McNeill explained there are a number of positions that need to be re-evaluated as some employees have outgrown their positions or duties. A discussion ensued regarding exempt and non-exempt employees and Mr. McNeill said this would be considered a confidential position and would qualify for overtime. A discussion ensued relating to point assignments, changes, and their impact on the budget. Sweeney/DuBois moved to direct staff to prepare for Council consideration the job description for the Payroll Benefits Administrator position and other matters associated with the position. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Voxland distributed a copy of the Operating Statement for the sanitary sewer, storm drainage and refuse funds. He said staff has not had sufficient time to review the Transit Fund information but will have it available for the December meeting. Mr. Voxland explained that the sanitary sewer revenue due to the flow fee is in line with Council's previous target of one million dollars and suggested no change. The trunk portion of the revenue is also in line with projections and he suggested continuing to increase the rate for inflation of construction costs. The base portion of the sewer fee is in good position and Council may want to consider a rate reduction. The operating fee portion of the storm drainage revenue is far below the accumulated depreciation figures and Mr. Voxland recommended increasing the base rate to close the gap with accumulated depreciation. A discussion ensued regarding changes to the enterprise funds, and Mr. Sweeney recommended reducing the base rate for the base portion of the Sanitary Sewer Fund by $51,000, increasing the base portion of the Storm Drainage Fund by $51,000, and no change to the Refuse Collection (as recommended by the Finance Director). Official Proceedings of the November 18, 1996 Shakopee City Council (Worksession) Page -4- Sweeney/Link moved to direct staff to present to Council for approval an increase in the base portion of the Storm Drainage Fund by $51,000, and a decrease in the base portion of the Sanitary Sewer Fund Account by $51,000, and to make no change for Refuse Collection. A discussion ensued regarding the income tax impact of the rates on individuals and businesses. Motion carried unanimously. A discussion ensued regarding the impact of the vehicle policy on the average employee. The biggest change is the addition of a mechanic's evaluation of vehicles. Sweeney/DuBois moved to direct staff to bring the vehicle policy to the Council for adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Sweeney discussed the Metropolitan Council's efforts to over see the water system and explained that they do not have the State authority to pick this up as a system at this time. Sweeney/DuBois moved to adjourn the worksession. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 6:01 P.M. tota e) . 0/K dith S. Cox City Clerk Esther TenEyck Recording Secretary OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 26, 1996 Mayor Henderson called the meeting to order at 5:03 P.M. with Councilmembers Robert Sweeney, Burl Zorn, and Cletus Link present. Cncl.Jane DuBois was absent. Also present: Mark McNeill, City Administrator; R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director; Bruce Loney, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Gregg Voxland, Finance Director; and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk. Scott County Board Members present: Ralph Malz, Scott County Commissioner; Gary Cunningham, Scott County Administrator; Art Bannerman, Scott County Commissioner; Wilma Behm, Scott County Commissioner; Dick Underferth, Scott County Commissioner; and Edward Mackie, Scott County Commissioner. Mr. Cunningham introduced Greg Davies, project manager of the Justice Center Project and Master Plan. Mr. Davies approached the podium and explained that the presentation of the Scott County Master Plan Study includes a 5-phase approach recommended by the team working on the project. Members of the architectural firm were also present to present the Plan. Michael Cox approached the podium to discuss the process in which the master plan was created, the 5-step process of the plan, and the schedule and what to expect. He explained that the master plan consists of a site large enough to accomplish the goals, access and parking He explained the function of the activities on the site and also the inner-relationships among the town. He listed three important factors of the master plan as being time, efficiency, and meeting expectations of goals and objectives. Mr. Cox stated that input was solicited from the County Engineers and City staff and Engineers to organize traffic and the site. Mr. Cox described the acquisition of the site as a 2-phase process. Phase one consists of a 3-square block area with the current court house, the parking lot, and the hospital site. The second phase is an acquisition approach due to the fact that additional parking and/or facilities will be needed. Mr. Cox discussed the effect of the bypass and how the public would arrive at the site. He explained that it has been concluded that the majority of the traffic will come from the east and west. However, there was not one specific street they felt they could focus on. He said the creation of the 5-block square which involves the closing of streets is a critical issue as it relates to the continuous development of the buildings and the site. Mr. Cox explained that in looking at the inner-relationships of the buildings the County realized a need for user friendly connections for entry and orientation of the site. He explained that this is the reason for suggesting one major location for parking, with buildings close by to orientate them to each other, and linking services and the Justice Center both internally and for orientation. He said the goal of the County is for visitors to see from the front door, a service center for county services Official Proceedings of the November 26, 1996 Shakopee City Council (Worksession) Page -2- and the Justice Center with its counter and services. Mr. Cox explained that there may come a time when there is a need to search for weapons and suggested confining entry to one point. The completion of the master plan (step 5) is anticipated to be between 2020 and 2050. This step develops a campus plan that develops functions met between buildings and the partnership back to the downtown area. Pathways or walkways and links for vehicles and pedestrians were also suggested. Step 1 is to build a new Justice Center, demolishing the library building, and addressing parking issues to match the need. The estimated time frame for total completion of construction is 1998. Step 2 is the renovation of the existing courthouse and court services, potentially demolishing the annex, and addressing short term parking thus completing the short term master plan. Step 3 envisions a time frame between 1999-2010, looking at the incremental acquisition of sites, incremental completion of a potential law enforcement building, and collaboration of parking with the church on Atwood. Step 4 involves the completion of additional parking and additional acquisitions to the north thereby completing the 5-block master plan between 2010-2020. This envisions the completion of the jail construction, walkways and buildings as shown on the master plan. Step 5 involves the potential of any additions to any of the building complexes. The time frame is between 2020-2050. In response to a question as to the purpose of narrowing 4th Avenue, Mr. Cox explained that 4th Avenue is expected to be a neckdown street with slower traffic for safety reasons. In response to a question as to whether it is good planning to plan a jail across from a church or a school, Mr. Cox explained that the County has not seen any adverse effects of jail buildings near a school and said that escapes are rare from modem facilities. When the County was looking at land within the County, there was a desire to focus downtown and there is a desire to have linkage between the jail and the Justice Center. Chuck Rickart, WSB & Associates, approached the podium and explained that the City had authorized them to look at the issues involved with the Justice Center and the impacts of the traffic around the Center. He said that Fuller Street was designated as the north-south collector years ago. He explained that because of the bypass a signal was installed on Fuller and T.H.169. He added that the County Road designation also goes through this area. He said that approximately 75% of the traffic is coming from the south and the west to the existing courthouse. Existing traffic counts were conducted in October, and based on the traffic counts, there are approximately 4,000 cars a day on Fuller, 2,300 cars a day on Atwood and 1,800 cars a day on Holmes. Official Proceedings of the November 26, 1996 Shakopee City Council (Worksession) Page -3- For Step 1 traffic on 4th Avenue was reduced from 4,500 to 2,200 cars a day. Traffic on Holmes increased from 1,800 to 4,400 and traffic on Scott Street increased from 715 to 2,200-2,300 cars a day. (Based on the analysis and 400 employees and 3,600 trips per day). In Step 3 the traffic moved from Scott to Atwood to between 3rd and 4th Avenues with parking on the north side of the site. (Based on 500 employees and 4,500 trips per day). Currently the collector street is Fuller Street from Hwy. 169 to Apgar and Spencer. The east-west collectors are 6th Street to Fuller and up to 4th Avenue and Sommerville. Scott Street has been looked at as a potential collector to Hwy. 169 to 10th Avenue. Depending on what happens with the bypass, minor changes may be needed at the traffic signal on Scott Street. Various options for south of 10th Avenue were suggested. If a continuous north/south street is desired Scott could be brought down into Apgar and relocating Fuller into Scott, or Apgar into Fuller is also an option. Jogging the designation and school impacts were also discussed. In response to a question as to whether one way streets were considered, it was stated that they would not be advantageous as continuity is important. In response to a question as to when public hearings are required, Mr. McNeill explained that a public hearing would be appropriate at the time of the proposed closure. Action by this Council can't be binding on a future Council. Two public hearings may be needed. In response to a question as to the positives and negatives of building over Fuller Street, it was explained that a via duct would be needed over the entry point and the biggest concern is that of safety and not having cars and pedestrians entering at the same point. The completion of the Justice Center is anticipated to occur the end of 1998. The following summer months will involve some action for Fuller Street to be completed in 1998. A discussion ensued regarding the possibility of a skyway and/or a walkway under the street which led to a discussion regarding safety issues. Cncl. Zorn asked if there was any County assistance available to the City to make Fuller Street the north/south collector. Mayor Henderson stated that there are three options: Atwood, which is not really an option, Apgar, which has a problem with the railroad tracks, and Scott, which appears to be the only choice by default. The biggest problem is the connection south of 10th Avenue as there is a developer interested in developing the land. The City is interested in the time table for breaking ground as the closure of Atwood will affect short-term traffic around the area. A willingness on the County's part to work with the Council in order to find a solution to Scott Street, . . Official Proceedings of the November 26, 1996 Shakopee City Council (Worksession) Page -4- and redesignating it a north/south collector is needed as well as additional information from the traffic study. A discussion ensued regarding impacts on adjacent properties. Cncl. Sweeney pointed out that by not closing 4th Street, a main set of east/west utilities will not be dug up and re-routed. Traffic counts at changing locations due to the bypass were recommended immediately. Mayor Henderson suggested waiting until late next summer to get a more accurate count. Mr. Cunningham stated that there are costs and benefits in having the Justice Center remain in Shakopee. He said there is a cost participation policy and assessments that the County would pay for any improvements to land and roads adjacent to the County buildings. He said that the County and the City could work together to develop something acceptable in terms of cost participation. He added that there is a seal of $11 million on this building to insure that no additional taxes are needed. The question is can the City Council support the concept if the details can be worked out with cost participation. Mayor Henderson explained that the City does support the County's efforts. Also, our concerns are that our resources are also limited and that if we assess we will have upset citizens. The biggest concern is to have an agreement in place for the potential costs: i.e.: crossing/relocation of light. Horst Graser, Gold Nugget Development, approached the podium and stated that they own 17 acres of vacant property south of 10th Avenue. He explained that the decision regarding the traffic south of 10th Street would affect his schedule. He said that it appears that Scott is likely for a collector and that it bisects their property and would seriously affect the value of the property. He encouraged consideration of the effect that the vacation option has on his property. He said that zoning has crossed his mind and it may no longer be a single family neighborhood as envisioned. There was a consensus that staff would price out the options immediately as well as obtain current traffic counts. Mr. Cox stated that the time frame for construction is early spring or summer and the design process will continue until that time. The County needs to request a formal closing of Fuller before public hearings can begin. Commissioner Matz reported that today the County Board came up with a policy on tax increment financing. Mr. Cunningham stated that his impression of the Board's hearing of the draft policy on tax increment financing was that the Board was in support of economic development in the county. He said that the law allows the County to participate in tax increment financing but that the Board can not allow taxes to be decreased. Official Proceedings of the November 26, 1996 Shakopee City Council (Worksession) Page -5- Mr. Cunningham said that if at any time the City staff would like to review the policy the County would be more than willing to walk them through it. He said that they would be interested in the City's comments on the draft policy. Mayor Henderson thanked the County for their support with issues involving tax increment financing for ADC Telecommunications. Cncl. Zorn stated that both the City and the County have sent letters to the Metropolitan Council. He said he would have liked to have taken a stronger stand on the amount of agricultural preservation in Scott County. Sweeney/Zorn moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 6:52 P.M. Mayor Henderson thanked the County Commissioners for coming to the meeting tonight. di tir /� (�. (� Irrdith S. Cox City Clerk Esther TenEyck Recording Secretary OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 16, 1997 Mayor Henderson called the meeting to order at 4:35 P.M. with Councilmembers Jane DuBois (at 4:37 P.M.)Burl Zorn, Bob Sweeney, and Clete Link present. Also present: Mark McNeill, City Administrator; Bruce Loney, Public Works Director, Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; Mark Huge, Fire Chief; Mary Athmann, Fireman; and Tom Pitschneider, Fireman. Mr. Huge identified the members on the fire department who have been working on the new fire station committee headed by Cncl.Link and Mary Athmann. Present from the architectural firm of Boarman Kroos Pfister Rudin& Associates, Inc. were Dave Kroos and Paul Mickelberg. Mr. Mickelberg explained how the new fire station will be located on the site and where the parking would be situated. The length of the building including the bays for the trucks would face Vierling Drive and the parking and main entrance would be to the West. He identified the various uses for the spaces within the foot print on each of the two floors of the building. He identified a couple of alternatives to the bids that Council may wish to consider to allow for future expansion. The total gross footage for the two floors has been reduced to under 25,000 sq. ft. Cncl.DuBois suggested that the training room might be available for other city functions. Mr. Mickelberg explained the landscape design as proposed. Mr. Kroos explained the cost estimate and what is included in each category: Property cost impacts, including utilities and permits $ 425,232 Construction estimate, including site improvements 2,410,471 Other expenses, including professional fees, equipment, financing 421,683 Contingency 5% 141,608 Total Schematic Budget $3,398,993 Mr. Kroos stated that they recommend bidding four or five alternatives that could be considered by Council when the bids are received. They are still looking at other costs to bid as alternatives. As it looks now, everything is on track for the cost estimate. Sweeney/DuBois moved to direct staff to continue on with the fire station project as presented. Official Proceedings of the January 16, 1997 Shakopee City Council (Worksession) Page -2- Mr. Loney explained that there is blanket gas easement on the site and that the gas line is going to have to be lowered at the City's expense. He said that there is a major transmission line running through the City. He recommended meeting with Minnegasco on the relocation now. It was suggested that the City select a site for the dirt that has to be moved for the new station in order to keep the costs for dirt removal down. It was noted that there is an 8" sanitary sewer line in CR-16, but none in Vierling Drive. Motion carried unanimously. Zorn/Sweeney moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 5:39 P.M. Judith S. Cox `City Clerk Recording Secretary WoIeI- SSSS CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor& City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Street Light Policy for the City of Shakopee DATE: February 21, 1997 INTRODUCTION: This memorandum will identify the past practices of the City in regard to street lighting and discuss the issues relating to establishing a street lighting policy. BACKGROUND: Street lighting is installed in the City primarily at the time of new subdivision installation. The current City Code under Chapter 12, Section 12.06, Subd. 6 states "the subdivider shall provide for installation of street lighting and operating for a period of three (3) years as prescribed by the Utilities Manager". In addition to the ordinance, the City requires the developer to enter into a developer's agreement to install street lighting. In this agreement, "Street lighting, electrical systems and water systems are to be installed in accordance with the requirements of Shakopee Public Utilities Commission". Attached to this memorandum are existing policies and resolutions in regards to street lighting labeled as Attachment No. 1 and as follows: • Administrative Policy No. 142 -New Street Lights and Maintenance. • Administrative Policy No. 130 - Lights in Rural Subdivisions and Street Lights in New Subdivisions. • Council Minutes of August 9, 1977 • Resolution No. 1144 - Establishing Payments by Shakopee Public Utilities Commission to the City in Lieu of Taxes. • • Resolution No. 3298 - Adopting a Policy for Decorative Street Lighting In review of these documents, SPUC has been the entity responsible for determining the street light standards, spacing length, street light locations and also responsible for maintenance and power for the street lights, with the ownership of the street lights to the City. The City is required to pay for the installation or replacement of street lights. The City has paid for the street lights over the years, mainly through developers or special assessments to benefiting properties, and on occasion through the Capital Improvement Fund for street lights on collector streets. The desire expressed from the Council and developers, is for more street lights being installed, and that a clear policy on street light standards has never been adopted by the City. Attached also to this memorandum are copies of policies for street lighting labeled as Attachment No. 2 and as follows: 1. City of Prior Lake Residential Street Lighting Policy. 2. City of Savage Street Lighting Standards Upon review of these policies, a Street Lighting Policy for the City should address the following items to some degree: 1. Street Lighting Standards A. Type of Fixtures B. Spacing and Location of Street Lights C. Different Standards for Different Land Uses (Residential, Commercial, Industrial) D. Existing Subdivisions vs. New Subdivisions E. Rural vs. Urban Subdivisions F. County Roads 2. Funding of Costs A. Initial Installation of Fixtures B. Replacement of Fixtures C. Operating Costs D. Maintenance Costs On street lighting standards, it is typically the electrical utility company working with the City to compile a list of light fixtures to be used as the standards. SPUC has established standard fixtures in which they will maintain. A memo from Joe Adams, Shakopee Public Utilities Commission's Administrative Assistant, is included in the report which addresses the street lighting practice over the years and details current standards and examples of lighting fixtures. Mr. Adam's memo is labeled Attachment No. 3 and contains following information: 1. Memo describing street lighting standards, past poli 2. Data sheets on street lightin P cies and practices. g standards currently in use. 3. Resolution #272, clarifying factors used in the determination of the contri Utilities Commission to the taxes. City of Shakopee in lieu from the Shakopee Public Operation and maintenance costs are being provided in lieu taxes to the City. by SPUC as consent of aimplementingtotheCiy. Any change in current Part SPUC the contrib al c- a new policy. Policy should have approval o- The cost to operate and maintain a street light is currently this informationcostto should be maintain a by being hae been askedto addressethe leCouncil the the F calculated by SPUC staffanc subject coststo generate and maintain' February 25, 1997 1997Worw ssios SPUC e February 25, work session on the fan street lighting. The current practices for street lighting standards and follows: funding of costs are summarized as STREET LIGHTING STANDARDS A. Type of Fixtures 1. Residential street -24 foot fiberglass poles with pressure sodium (H.p.S.)lamp. 100 watt high 2. Collector Street (north of Shakopee Bypass) 250 watt cobra head style luminaries. 40 foot wooden poles with 3. Collector Street- (south of Shakopee Bypass) - 34 foot fiberglass poles with a 250 watt H.P.S. lamp in shoebox style luminaries. 4. Industrial Park - 34 foot fiberglass pole with 250 watt H.P.S. lamp with shoebox style luminaries. Question: Does City Council have any objections over the style of lighting fixtures currently being utilized? B. Spacing and Location of Street Lights 1. Residential - At intersections, ends of most cul-de-sacs and at points between intersection when the spacing is greater than 600 feet. 2. Collector Streets - At intersection and at points between intersections where the spacing is greater than 300 feet. 3. Industrial Areas - At intersection and at points between intersections where the spacing is greater than 450 feet. Question: Does City Council feel the spacing of street lights for residential streets, collector streets and industrial areas is adequate or not? C. Existing Versus New Subdivisions 1. In existing areas, any new street lights would typically be similar in style to the surrounding lighting fixtures. Installation costs have been assessed to benefiting property owners. The cost of preparing the feasibility report and conducting the public hearing is approximately 30% - 40% of the street light cost. Staff would strongly recommend that if a street light is to be installed under the current criteria, that the petitioners enter into an agreement with the City to pay for the light upfront and forego the 429 Special Assessment procedures. Question: Should Council adopt a policy for paying for the street light upfront for installation of street lights in existing areas that are requested by residents in lieu of special assessments? D. Rural Versus Urban Residential Subdivisions 1. Currently the same standards are being applied to a rural as well as urban residential subdivision. Many rural lots can have a width greater than 300 feet and could possibly have two street lights along the lot. Question: Should there be a different spacing standard for rural residential subdivisions versus urban residential? E. County Roads 1. The current practice is to request the County to perform a warrant study for street lighting at intersections. If warrants are met, the County installs the light with the cost of operation and maintenance to the City. Also any street lighting along a County Road for instance to light a sidewalk or trail the City installs would be the City's obligation and a policy standard does not exist at this time. Question: Should the City install street lights at all intersections of streets to County roads and request the County to pay for appropriate share or continue with current cooperative agreement policy? Question: Should the City establish a policy to install street lights along County Roads particularly in the urban area and request the County to pay for appropriate share or continue with current cooperative agreement policy? FUNDING OF COSTS A. Initial Installation of Fixtures 1. New subdivisions - developers will pay for the street lighting system and enter into an agreement with SPUC. 2. Existing subdivisions - new street lights would be paid for by benefiting properties either by special assessments or upfront payment. 3. Collector streets and County roads -if sufficient traffic volume exists, the street lights could be considered for traffic safety and a benefit to the Community as a whole. These street lights should be paid by the City out of the Capital Improvement Fund. B. Replacement of Fixtures 1. The replacement of fixtures is a maintenance cost to the City. C. Operating Costs 1. The power for street lighting is contributed by SPUC and is also deducted from the gross sales in the determination of the contribution from SPUC to the City in lieu of taxes. In essence, the City taxpayers are paying for 23.77% of the power and SPUC rate payers are paying 76.23% of the operating costs. D. Maintenance Costs 1. SPUC donates relamping maintenance services for street lighting. The purpose of this memo and the attachments is to inform the Council on current street lighting practices and standards in Shakopee, and to obtain direction on various policy issues relating to street lighting in order to formulate a written policy for street lighting in the City of Shakopee. RECOMMENDATION: In review of current practices in Shakopee and in comparison to other Cities, staff would have the following recommendations: 1. The current fiberglass decorative street lights for residential streets, and fiberglass shoebox style street lights for collector streets and industrial areas, are acceptable light fixtures for new subdivisions. Existing subdivisions should utilize the style and wattage of nearby street lights unless this style is not available. 2. The current spacing of lights for collector streets and industrial areas is acceptable. Residential urban street light spacing of 600 feet may be too long and staff would suggest a spacing of 300 feet to 400 feet. Rural residential spacing should remain at 600 feet. 3. In existing areas, if additional street lighting is requested and meets the new standards, a petition shall be signed by 60% of the property owners from 150 feet either side of the proposed street light location. If then approved by the City Council, the street light shall be paid for prior to the installation. Method of payment shall be as directed by the City Finance Director. 4. Along County roads, direction should be given to staff to establish or not, standards for street lighting in Urban Areas. ACTION REQUESTED: Discuss street lighting practices and standards and provide direction on a written policy to be developed for City Council and Shakopee Public Utilities Commission's approval. Bruce Loney Public Works Director BL/pmp STLIGHTS 41°- ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY NO. 142 Subject : New Street Lights (Maintenance of) Date Adopted: June 30, 1986 Source of Authority: City Council Minutes • Shakopee City Council June 30, 1986 Page 2 � �-�i►-,a,,/ Leroux/Colligan moved to direct staff to work out tentative language for an agreement with SPUC for signal light maintenance. Motion carried unani- mously. The City Admr. summarized the reasoning for the paper exchange of the fees for electricity being provided to the City by SPUC. Because of the Local Government Aid formula, the City would be eligible for $7,000 to $8,000 more if this is reported. It would just show up on the audit as a billed service instead of a free one, either monthly or at the end of the year. Commissioner Cook emphasized that changing the accounting procedure was no problem, but SPUC doesn' t want to lose control of the authority for mainte- nance of the street lights. The SPUC Manager said the City Council has always had the control of whether or not street lights go in, and SPUC takes careofthe maintenance of them. He pointed out that the $40,000 is the cost to SPUC, but the benefit to the City is more like $120,000, which is not reflected. Discussion continued regarding where the final authority would lie for putting in street lights of a certain design or efficiency. Leroux/Wampach moved to direct staff to work with the auditor to come up with an accounting procedure for acknowledging the transfer of the cost of utilities from SPUC to the City. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Wampach moved to maintain SPUC's authority for maintenance decisions regarding street lighting and implementation of all new street lights; with any variances to be mediated between the City and SPUC. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion followed regarding the ordinance to be drafted to allow the City to place delinquent utility bills on the tax rolls. The SPUC Manager stated at this time there are some apartment building owners who do not want the utilities turned off at any time and have signed agreements that they are responsible if the renter doesn't pay his bills. Comm. Cook said this prob- lem accounts for about $6,000 loss out of $4 million dollars of income, and therefore he doesn't think the paperwork would be worth it. The SPUC Manager suggested just using this technique to go after the larger accounts. If this language was in the Ordinance, it would still be up to SPUC to get • the necessary information and agreement from the property owner. The City Admr. was directed to do some further research on this item and check with the City Attcrney about possible discrimination if the agreement is sought with some property owners and not all. Comm. Cook asked if the zoning is proper for SPUC to move its pole yard to the water tower in the Industrial Park; and he was answered it was I1 or 12 but that SPUC should check with the City Planner on all requirements. SPUC said they would be ready to move the poles before the trees were ready to be planted. The SPUC Manager asked for a different location for the dumpsters for the annual clean-up program. He said they often block the only door chat is big enough for semis, and there is a lot of broken glass left afterwards. • ///4-4,-t.z./. 141/ ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY NO. 130 Subject: Lights in Rural Subdivisions Date Adopted: August 28 , 1985 Source of Authority: City Administrator According to Lou VanHout, SPDC Manager, they do not nave a standard method of locating lights. They usually place lights at intersections and cul-de-sacs. Lights placed between depend on distances from intersections or cul-de-sacs. Locations also may be based on property owners wishes. Subject: Street Lights in New Subdivisions Date Adopted: May 17, 1988 Source of Authority: SPUC Manager Per Lou VanHout, SPUC Manager, per a telephone conversation For new subdivisions , Lou' s requirements for street lighting are as follows : 1. Street light at each corner and at each cul-de-sac 2 . If a street is over 1,000 feet a street light is required every 600 feet i,<14 7d1 1/ OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ.REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AUGUST 9, 1977 Mayor Harbeck called the meeting to order at 5:03 P.M. with Cncl. Hullander, Reinke, Ward and Leroux present. Cncl.Lebens was absent. Also present were Utilities Commissioners Bishop, Nolting and Reinke; the City Adm. ; City Treasurer; and Mr. Van Hout and Mr. Leaveck from the Shakopee Public Utilities. Hullander/Leroux moved to reconsider Variance Resolution No. CC-147, a size variance from the Sign Ordinance, which was -acted upon at the July 26th meeting. Cncl.Hullander explained that the reason for his motion is because the applicant would like to make another proposal at this evenings meeting. Discussion followed. Motion carried unanimously. Hullander/Leroux.:moved .to .table •Variance :Resolution No. .CC-147. until. the next -regular session. Motion-:carried .unanimously. . Discussion commenced on the contribution of the_Shakopee .Public - Utility Commission to the General Fund of the City of Shakopee. The City Administrator and the Utilities Manager prepared a memo, which was distributed prior to the meeting, explaining the problem and recommending a solution. The present contribution is 12% of gross revenue. They recommended that this formula be changed to 22.5% of gross .margin. Mr. Jerome Jaspers of Jaspers, Loosbrock Inc. ,. stated that he felt this was a better formula for the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. Commissioner Bishop stated that he felt this formula would -allow :the Utilities to increase .their reserves. The--present formula was not allowing them to do this. The City Adm. and the Utilities Mgr.-also .recommended_that the contributiot of the Utilities be set at /2.5% of the gross margin with 'a minimum contribution of $230,000 per _year. Secondly, they recommended that _the City pay for the cost of electricity for ,city buildings .and that the percentage of gross- margin be .adjusted-to reflict theseadditional costs. - Thirdly, they recommended that the Utilities continue to provide free service :and -maintenance -for- the--street .lighting. . Ward/Hullandermoved to concurwith the. three recommendations-and that the city staff draw .up- the appropriate resolLtion :or ordinance to : reflect.'this. Motion -carried-unanimously.;. Ass't. .City Attorney Rod 'Kress -reported :that_he ,had:,received a _letter from Mr. Allendorf .of:.Rahr:,asking _that the:-industries --be kept-informed :on the -progress of -the negotiations with Northern .States :Power.- He -is keep ing them informed. Commissioner Bishop reported .that._the-_Utilities:will be:--meeting with the representatives from N.S.P. again tomorrow.:. The._current• draft 'of an - agreement looks good.. . Mayor Harbeck suggested that:°the Utilities set a goal for increasing their reserves. Discussion followed. The Auditor, Mr.-Jaspers, passed out.copies of the 1936. audit for the_. City of Shakopee and will be at the. August 23rd meeting for discussion. . Commissioner Bishop thanked both the City Adm. and the Utilities Manager for their efforts in putting together a proposal that both the City and the Utilities can live with, but neither are over joyed with. It is nice to be able to work together. Mayor Harbeck concurred with Commissioner Bishop. Leroux/Reinke moved to adjourn at 5:47 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator , , , ..-:-,..". •* -',..'"•:-. 1.,,71' - _.4.,, , '1.'.1•-4"-t•...,-;-.1.-• • -r led/CA' '10/ ill RESOLUTION NO. 1144 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PAYMENTS BY THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION TO THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE IN LIEU OF TAXES BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE AS FOLLOWS: I i 1. The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission did, by Resolution No. 193 dated 12/12/77, agree to and therefore shall contribute to the general fund of the City of Shakopee an amount annually equal to the greater of the following: a. $240,383.00 or b. 23.77 per cent of its gross margin, gross margin being defined as the total gross sales minus the total cost of purchase energy. 2. Said payments shall commence on Jaunary 1, 1978. One- twelfth of the annual amount shall be paid monthly on the first day of each month commencing January 1, 1978. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of SHakopee, Minnesota, held this 13th day of December, 1977. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: 1 lG =%i City Clerly Prepared and approved as to fors, this 31A day of , 1977. �// I SS, P •HAN,' EYER & KANNING Assistant City Attorneys HOyl,,, ) ('i1 �, M-L1 '/ Resolution No. 3298 A Resolution Adopting a Policy For the City of Shakopee For Decorative Street Lighting WHEREAS, on October 9, 1990 the City Council discussed the lack of a policy allowing for more decorative street lighting to be constructed in platted subdivisions by a developer and/or a property owners association if so desired; and WHEREAS, the Utilities Manager has identified the need for such a policy and has proposed such a policy for allowing decorative street lighting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. A special street lighting agreement may be adopted with the approval by the City Council for street lighting in approved subdivisions where a property owners association exists. 2 . The following format shall be used as a guide in drafting such agreements: DEVELOPER and/or HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION shall agree to: Furnish and install (or cause to be installed) : streetlight light fixtures, standards, and miscellaneous hardware as shown on drawing(s) approved by SPUC. Furnish and install (or cause to be installed) : underground wiring from point of supply to each street light location, including all wiring within pole and fixture, using material and methods as shown on drawing (s) approved by SPUC. Locate streetlights as shown on drawing(s) approved by City of Shakopee and SPUC. Maintain an inventory of replacement globes, ballasts, and standards, and furnish same to SPUC personnel for repairs as needed from time to time. Replace the fixtures, standards, and miscellaneous hardware at the end of their normal service life with new equipment approved by SPUC. SPUC may agree to: Provide on behalf of the City of Shakopee, until terminated by SPUC action: �Pr/ Li / Energy used by the streetlight system. • Routine maintenance and lamp replacement, using lamps and photocells which are common to a significant portion of other streetlighting systems maintained by SPUC. Routine maintenance to wiring. Installation of replacement globes, ballasts, and standards, furnished by the developer or homeowners association. City may agree to: Accept the responsibility of furnishing energy and maintenance to the streetlighting system as City responsibility until terminated by city Council action. 3 . Any such agreement shall be written and designed to place all responsibility on the Developer and/or Homeowners Association, except as otherwise specified above. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 9th day of October, 1990. • - - Mayor of i of <hakopee ATTEST: f City Clerk / Approve91 as to form this day of , 19 771 6:2t; --� City Attorney ' C 7 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING POLICY ( Yd/%°e/YZI 2_1Z‘ 'gS ./ BACKGROUND: The City intends that this street lighting policy promote the safe travel of city streets in a manner both fair and affordable to the City and its residents. Residential street lighting promotes pedestrian and traffic safety to the extent that the City shall approve street lighting where warranted by such concerns. Lighting requests shall come either by recommendation of the City Engineer or by resident petition. The capital costs of residential street lighting shall be the responsibility of those residents, or any portion of those residents, determined to be affected by the light. NEW SUBDIVISIONS: All lighting plans require approval by the City and the utility responsible for street light operation and maintenance. In new subdivisions street lights shall be placed at intersections, every 300 feet between intersections where intersections are more than 600 feet apart, and at the ends of cul-de-sacs where the distance from said end to the intersection of the cul-de-sac with the street is greater than 300 feet. Within their developments, developers shall also install lights to City standards at the intersections of residential streets with collector streets. The developer shall pay the full capital cost of every light to be installed; this includes poles, fixtures, underground wiring, and a!! appurtenant work. The developer shall pay operation and maintenance for the light system until the City accepts the project, at which time the billing shall be transferred to the City. 100 or 150 watt high pressure sodium lights in traditional or cobra-head style (as approved by the City and the utility) shall be the standard for new subdivisions. Where a portion of the development is already lit, new lights shall match in style and wattage those already in place. In cases where developers wish to install more lights than warranted by city policy, or wish to install non-standard lights, monthly operation and maintenance becomes the responsibility of the development's residents through their homeowner's association or similar organization. The City will not take over such non-standard systems, though City approval shall still be required. EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS: Where traffic safety clearly warrants, a street light may be placed upon the recommendation of the City Engineer's office. The basis of such warrants shall be a minimum Average Daily Traffic of 2000 vehicles or a layout such that, in the City Engineer's estimation, significant improvement in safety might be obtained by the placement of a street light. Since the benefit of such installations extends to the City as a whole, these will be done at City expense. When residents request additional lighting for their neighborhoods, they must do so by petition - signed by 60% of the neighbors affected by the proposed light. The affected area shall be 100 linear feet on either side of the proposed light, on both sides of the street. The placement of the proposed light shall be specified in the petition. Petitioners shall approach the City prior to circulating their petition to obtain direction as to where street lights are warranted for their neighborhoods. Lights shall be approved only as they meet the following warrants for existing subdivisions: intersections, between intersections at intervals of 300 feet where the distance between intersections is greater than 600 feet, and at the ends of cul-de-sacs where the distance from said end to the intersection of the cul-de-sac with the street is greater than 300 feet. If approved, each street light shall be purchased by the affected residents. Payment shall be made prior to the installation of the light and shall include the cost of poles, fixtures, underground wiring, and all appurtenant work. The method of payment shall be as directed by the City Finance Department. The City shall assume operation and maintenance costs for a light from the time it is energized by the utility. In existing developments new lights shall match in style and wattage those already in place. If no lights be currently in place, then 100 or 150 watt high pressure sodium lights in cobra-head or traditional style shall be the standard. BBSL.ARCH Update:2/07/95 ,TY OF SAVAGE 6128822656; 02/05/97 11 :29; jetfax #375;Page 2/3 2 Street Lighting Standards - City of Savage Residential Area Local Residential Streets- Typicallightinstalled in this area is a"Decorative"style street light . Light is mounted on a dark brown fiberglass pole, 14 feet above the ground. Light is available only in 150 watt high pressure sodium. Lights are installed at ail intersections and the end of cul-de-sacs. Lights are also installed on a 300'to 400'spacings between intersections. Residential Collector Streets-Typical light installed on these types of roadway are the "Shoebox"light. This light is mounted on a short arm(usually 4'to 8',depends on the pole setback from the curb)attached to a dark brown fiberglass pole,30' above the ground. This light is installed at major intersection and along collector routes. Lights are installed on a 300' to 400' spacing plans usually alternated from one side to the others depending on the width of the road. Lights come in two wattage, 150 and 250. Commercial and Industrial Area Local and Collector Street- Typical lights installed in these areas are the"Shoebox" light. This light is again mounted on a short arm(usually 4' to 8', depends on the pole setback from the curb)attached to a dark brown fiberglass pole,30' above the ground. This light is installed at major intersection and along the streets. Lights are installed on the 300`-400' spacing and usually alternated from one side to the others depending on the width of the road. Lights come in two wattage, 150 and 250. Plan Approval - All lighting plans are submitted to the City for approval. The plan is usually reviewed and approved by the Public Works Superintendent with input from the Engineering Department if necessary. 4//eC/nlek-/- MEMO TO: Bruce Loney,City Engineer FROM: Joe Adams, SPUC Administrative Assistant `'• 1 RE: STREET LIGHTING STANDARDS DATE: 2/19/97 As requested,we have put together a packet of information concerning street lighting standards and policies used in the City of Shakopee. Attached are data sheets on what is currently in use. The standards have evolved over the years as the distribution system went from being overhead to underground and as new materials became available. Over time a street lighting practice has also evolved,although I would hesitate to call it a policy since I am unaware of any street lighting resolutions passed by the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. I will attempt to provide a synopsis of the state of street lighting in Shakopee, starting with the downtown area. The downtown area has special street lighting that was installed starting a number of years ago with the first phase of the downtown streetscape project,the MNDOT construction of the mini-bypass,the second phase of the downtown streetscape project and the downtown alleys undergrounding project. The downtown streetscape project caused two types of lighting to be installed. Street lighting is provided by 250 watt high pressure sodium(HPS)lamps installed in "shoebox"style single luminaries (fixtures)extended from 35 foot concrete poles. Street lights are energized by our pilot wire system which is controlled by a single photoelectric eye mounted on a power pole located at the Lewis Street Substation. Decorative lighting is provided by 100 watt HPS lamps installed in"acorn" style single or double,luminaries mounted atop 13 foot concrete poles. Decorative lights are energized from seconcbry service wires controlled by time clocks inside service cabinets along the streets. The time clocks are seasonally adjusted to allow the pilot wire system to turn on the decorative lights at dusk and off at approximately 1:45 am,except for those on Lewis Street and First Avenue which remain on all night. The MNDOT mini-bypass project installed street lighting on the new bridge and along the mini-bypass from approximately Atwood to Main Streets. These street lights are similar to the decorative lights in the downtown streetscape project area except the poles are made of steel. These street lights are energized from secondary service wires controlled by separate photoelectric eyes mounted atop three different service cabinets. The downtown alley undergrounding project required a new light be installed mid-block in each alley where the power poles were to be removed. The lighting standard used is similar to the street lights in the downtown strectscape project arca except the poles arc made of steel. In the older parts of Shakopee, generally north of Shakopee Avenue,we maintain an overhead distribution system. Street lights are either attached to a wood power pole, i.e. a pole with overhead distribution circuits attached,or a free standing street light pole. The street lighting standards are a globe style luminaire,mounted at the end of a metal arm anywhere from 3 to 20 feet in length,with either a 250 watt mercury vapor or 100 watt high pressure sodium(HPS) lamp. Wattage is not a true indication of light levels,which are measured in lumens. HPS lamps are more efficient,i.e. use less power(wattage),and provide better light quality,compared to mercury vapor lamps. Mercury vapor lamps are not installed in new street lights and are being replaced with HPS lamps when they burn out. Street lights are mounted as high as possible on power poles,but below the power lines. When a street light pole is required it is usually a 40 foot wood pole that is buried 6 feet into the ground. The lamps are typically 32 feet above the ground. The streets in old Shakopee are laid out in a grid pattern with spacing between intersections generally 330 feet. I believe each intersection has a street light with additional lights at intermediate positions where the grid pattern is broken. As you know,when a new plat is approved by the City Council,the developer is usually required to pay for street lighting as determined by the Shakopee Public Utilities Manager. This applies whenever the plat is inside our designated service territory. There are still some areas of the city that are outside our service territory. These are generally located in the industrial park,a portion of which is served by Northern States Power Company;and an area generally south and west of the intersection of Polk Street and 13th Avenue,which was formerly part of Jackson Township,and is within Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative's service territory. The developer must sign an underground electric distribution agreement with us to get underground power installed in the plat. A part of the underground agreement addresses street lighting requirements. The cost of each street light is generally charged out at$700 apiece with some modifications,e.g. cost is reduced to$350 if the light can be mounted on a pre-existing power pole. The$700 fee is intended to cover the installation cost and operation,i.e. electricity,& maintenance,i.e. re-tamping,costs for three years. After the initial three year period, operation and maintenance costs are"donated"to the city. I believe the operation cost is classified as a"cost of energy"factor in the calculation of the Utilities Commission's contribution to the City of Shakopee in lieu of taxes. That effectively reduces the amount of the contribution by 23.77%of the"cost of energy"expense. Installation of new street lights occurs when we install the underground electric power in the plat. The underground service wires to each street light are buried alongside the primary cable in a joint trench wherever possible. This results in considerable cost savings. Stand alone street lighting projects with underground wiring can run between $2,000 to$3,000 per light depending on the style. It has been our practice to install street lights on local streets in new plats at each of the intersections,the ends of most cul-de-sacs and at points between intersections when the spacing is excessive. This is a judgment call. I believe the idea has been to keep the spacing down to somewhere around 600 feet maximum. That is to say,if intersection spacing is greater than 600 feet,additional street lights would be installed at intermediate points. These intermediate points must be at lot corners so as not to interfere with potential driveway locations and are usually placed near either a transformer or a service pedestal. The street lighting standards we now use in new residential plats are 24 foot fiberglass poles that are buried 4.5 feet into the ground. A post mount colonial style luminaire (fixture)with a 100 watt high pressure sodium lamp is mounted on top of the pole at a height of approximately 19.5 feet above ground level. When the distribution system first started being installed underground,generally south of Shakopee Avenue,we installed 24 foot laminated wood poles for street lights. However, we cannot purchase these anymore so hence the switch to fiberglass. This occurs generally south of Tenth Avenue. Now,whenever one of these laminated wood poles needs to be replaced it is with a fiberglass pole. There is a part our service territory inside the city limits that was purchased from Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative. A portion of this acquired area was already developed with underground distribution including street lighting. This is primarily the Hauers Additions and the Hillside Estates Addition. The street lighting standards in these additions consists of 18 foot fiberglass poles that are �� � buried 4.5 feet into the ground. A post mount colonial style luminaire(fixture)with a 100 watt high pressure sodium lamp is mounted on top of the pole at a height of approximately 13.5 feet above ground level. As for collector streets,e.g. Vierling Drive,we install different street light standards and decrease the spacing that is used on local streets. Street lights on collector streets are installed at each intersection and at points between intersections where the spacing is excessive. The spacing should be approximately 300 feet between street lights. The developer is supposed to pay for the street lights at the intersections with local streets and the City of Shakopee is supposed to pay for the street lights at the intermediate points and at intersections with County Roads. This policy is being followed on Vierling Drive as it is constructed across the city. I've enclosed a copy of a memo on the subject written by your predecessor,Dave Hutton,concerning the Vierling Drive project between County Roads 17 and 16. On collector streets north of the Shakopee Bypass;we are installing 250 watt HPS lamps, in cobra head style luminaries,mounted at the end of 10 foot arms atop 40 foot wood poles that are buried 6 feet into the ground. The lamps are typically 32 feet above the ground. On collector streets south of the Shakopee Bypass;we are installing 250 watt HPS lamps, in shoebox style luminaries,mounted at the end of 6 foot arms atop 34 foot fiberglass poles that are buried 6 feet into the ground. The lamps are typically 30 feet above the ground. In the industrial park the developer,Valley Green Business Park,did not want street lighting that utilized wood poles. After much discussion and research into alternatives for more pleasing aesthetics and concern for our ability to support too many different standards,an agreement was reached whereby we are installing the 250 watt HPS lamps, in shoebox luminaries,mounted at the end of 6 foot arms atop 34 foot fiberglass poles. Due to the nature of the industrial park with its lack of intersections and minimal pedestrian traffic,we and the developer have generally settled on street light spacing of approximately 450 feet. This was a compromise between the 600 foot spacing on the local streets and the 300 foot spacing on the collector streets. It should be noted that even 300 foot spacing results in"dead" spots along the road. There is a distinction to be made between street lighting and the more intense roadway lighting that one might find on a heavily traveled highway in an urban area. Spacing of lights for roadway lighting is more on the order of 100 to 150 feet maximum. That about covers our standards and practices. There are some other miscellaneous areas of lighting such as the street lights atop traffic signal poles at various intersections and First Avenue east and west of the mini-bypass with its roadway lighting on older style aluminum poles. Another type of lighting we install is security lighting,which can sometimes be confused with street lighting since some of the same standards are used. We offer the rental of security lighting to our electric customers. It is supposed to be available only if it can be attached to an existing power pole,although in the past there have been some exceptions to this rule and we have installed our lights on customer owned poles. This type of lighting is usually desired to light driveways,parking lots or sometimes signs. I realize that this is probably more information than you expected but I make no apology for its length. Street lighting is an issue that is hard to put ones arms around. Especially here in Shakopee where we have so many different styles. As I mentioned to you on the phone today,I will be taking some photographs of street lights to illustrate the different styles and forwarding a set to you when they arc developed. Please call me with any questions concerning this information. C: Lou VanHout,Utilities Manager fol t9 : T 2,11-97 uioc ivy, wood PDe 5 CRo use-M/n/os AA, So 31-PS C.0 no n-rF tf€ -( it 6 VX a5 5 -- 3E1/ # 1 n( mc•- irk -w' 14 14355 / be r-� 1As5 e- a / P/ �y � P C71.4uvt 6 ILv/'2- ,4- ri A�-�- ITT Amo Et�T p_� W ft 5 5H & $a� /5-30/71/3 ¢/3 3 . s- ...,r. Amp` s 11- 5701 o gide '.�' /00 W / z GtAtiy r H P.5 1- 3 ' +o go' yrs e+-L- o Po e-71--- PV L e __ t n , circ # a it7-570/3-4 W -'-P c 'c t y►'k a v t C o L-M t w,-L ¶, N f L frt-M. Let a(- � w v D ct /55 51#"E3PEytae r F‘ 13-e 1 L-0465 - 0-0- 6� A) __ B5-IS -oi-pus-4A-og r it 'Ft w5s -611-z) AF-z- �s_� -o,-n►5 4 8 311-1 Fi be rq l a s5 -- b n v N z. 13 W-3.54(0-Ns-c4-0 ti 442:"_1(itamgagotpii.,./,-1 Ai Li &4-4-7-7A2,-- fitebxn., sra6 ST N 6�'R-ls ca r- ,,( C 611/77_ IJ L r Pale_ Douai Gni inz -c0 /'/ m4/4D ilo-3-2�5- r o U) sgoe X - 3 //,.4.An4 57_6124)e4 (2) Type B Units ( L ^ The luminaire/standard combinations shall be: 5(.0 (' Sterner Lighting/Centrecon (Victorian) Standards 1/ Model No. A850-508;100 QTBRZ-GR luminaire ' ? � l ' fluted standard o'e O. CEO-3.6-TV-SP-613 octagonal standard With minimum cable entrace hole 1 3/4" by 12" or Union Metal Lighting/Union Metal Concrete Standards Model No. 705-B-12-WG luminaire-100LX-QD-TM Octagonal standard fluted not available With minimum cable entrance hole 1 3/4" by 12" or Visco Lighting/Ameron Concrete Cat. No. MK-19C/21C/FP-118/100HPS-120V/AD-PLT/CTBS/IES IV luminaire Cat. No. SK-12FL/MKS 10/CB/GFI/DE/CTBS/GL embedded/standard Octagonal standard fluteded not available with minimum cable entrance hole 1 3/4" by 12" or Architectural Lighting/Stress Crete Concrete Model No. ALN414-CLX-cast top-100HPS-BLE luminaire Model No. TEC-17-C-X-O-CSA-SF-140-OCT base-E10 octagonal standard fluted standard not available 1111 With minimum cable entrance hole 1 3/4" by 12" or the approved equal 1111 Contractor shall furnish two extra standards and four extra luminaires to the City. 1111 1111 1111 U • ii U 58. m nJ N1rel UI _• c0 en y a t O ID ._9 4 _ cr "rd wI- N 1�' O.<V 15ut Z 1.' VI r-� WZ-NI iG M1;1 Z 2 L i .A J W�(] J WU. W 2 y ► 1 'V, (._, :^"...,— W,) d 11J 11, �w Q Z i- ----.-.---, a� �0. Z o W �' 'L n o u O • rtri 6 o� z Z r r o-� Pia- U Qy o• o Ili l I1 .i< "i J, I 4In OW- a- Q V -• r.vm/j C N- JWW (r) ,I^ Cr,« N N • �SC f'1 �j.-N A o z s 3' I-- 14- ov - 2 DI- {- Q W > Q. _�1 � ow �ff 20 \ .G I a y S ` f dw Z V )" 1-- v o 7 n n' I . o r �A�iwg wQ W �' Z8. ` WZ • G a39' J W i 6l L- J` y{ � I` U U � , �� . .s W o �� .E UP-) = 112/1-S z _ 1"--t` - rQ oWr4 z NNW6 V) . Z Q Z o 0 pc W Q 14 rillill !. o pG= J tx gs� 11.11n?�' 1 ' WI- f: •�Z ZQv _)(41. 1E14+�',819 1^ 1'-I0 LI U co 0 -€0� Sr--�l.( \W U Orc)pc Y= iii°, ?' `. — - tin_1 06 q Nm '1i11 33 1 Z .UJectLi 1 vi =x�¢ NQS"� SSS55133 1••`:1 0 \..i 1 11-I in Z f J — A o - LI-t-r n v1 tD O A m in 1�1 wOX•J 4 11- -r V .Ir 54 1 „O-4; „el r _- 11 I-It' 11'-,C 1 U U (3) Type C units The lighting standards shall be the same of Type B units with the following exeptions: The standards will be adaptable to mount twin luminaires spaced Uapproximately 24 inches apart on light centers. The luminaires shall be the same as Type B units except twinfit Y(� The luminaire/standard combinations shall be: _ Sterner Lighting/Centrecon (Victorian) Standards 111 Mode No. A850-508-100 ?0 B'Z-GR-(twin) luminaire •c; , • ` "' _ fluted standard 'odel `o i 02.9-TV-TAD-SP-613 octagonal standard With minimum cable entrance hole 1 3/4" by 12" or 1 Union Metal Lighting/Union Metal Concrete Standards Model No. 705-B-12-WG-2 luminaires-100LX-QD-TM Octagonal standard fluted not available 111 With minimum cable entrance hole 1 3/4" by 12" or Visco Lighting/Ameron Concrete Cat. No. AC/MK-20C/MK-19C/FP118/MK17C/100HPS-120V/CTBS luminaire Cat. No. SK-12/FL/MKS10/CB/GFI/DE/CTBS/GL embedded standard Octagonal standard fluted not available with minimum cable entrance hole 1 3/4" by 12" or Architectual Lighting/Stress Crete Concrete Model No. ALN414-CLX-cast top-100-HPS-BLE luminaire Model No. TEC-17-C-X-O-CSA-SF-130-K63-OCT base-E10 Octagonal standard fluted not available With minimum cable entrance hole 1 3/4" by 12" of the approved equal 506. HANDHOLES See Section 400, SP 430. I I I 59. 4 I s r ec lei 03 u! '- - 0 00 = — Q w W 2 O O 7 Ot IP— L _s fIJW ./ ,-. ,„JWZJIf• J W< 6o--• rig_ WI r°C ' j �N.� WU Nd J' gip. '...-=‘../ 4.-.• In_ C"N Z I W in z z"z u.i t C gen:, �oa W € • Q OJ nJVI `P �`� �9�r 1,1 U Yl� .g.,J•Q ��u - <y.n 10.. 14 . - < W4I O •O,• o V 6 iQ N / �l. `� Q . r« vJ — V ci I \--=-M 8t.; _ 20 -l.. _ Z W A LL O e- ^ r M WZL___,,,1 4 01 •T �T.. .� ✓I O W. s Fcr W z @nl 1 IIL .� U U `a • rIti1 .sg (CAL- N 01 ' u 1 il"Vq; 4 • --so3a Z IWY ' I 11.1 /1t,•1 i;1 s i; tc r-WW� 11- N W 8 F rr 4 i N a sx .y-1 . 4 its' it} '•Uli4, U VI 14 "VITA i 4•Vii" W • I- W 0 O Z� p 2 O Q N Z o °1 _^ o A U L -�.r LI In p�(3 I 4.1 x v, F->- W 0 0 N� F WI- JI✓ T j cc< eil- • jt— all- wU u= O Ca ✓ - ^ OW i O nIv> - n. p O 1:11 vi � m7 % VoZ O Z( =W Li 1- Q f- Q cc) .-, � W Q- Z OZC 0J QZ \ i Q r � 1 Id :_7' ¢ tuz< W Mw \„.._ uZ WS J % p 0_43 c4 o ri- °CI � �X J^ C MSQW.."1.1W 1v O—per, n,J — I;tU<< \\..(3.:(:1 ,> -tea_" r( r azar[.1:114_IS I'}11'I : .-" "--r-1 II N it .�L - 1I�!illI._s, \/Z I o „QI —. on Q 01 11�_1� O-,4� 1 „ 8 c C , . ................ ida , r z J j Z Z W z PR1 t--IT�b Pt�l_ pc � < i < o 17A1zK g4P-c,NzEW e1.lAMEL F1 N E�jH I 0,--1FII I IAL PND riTTE ft_3 Z 1 9 ilz.,6...5.5. 1:z=> _ All APPRox. 911 111 a S. per,. -►-4;c-�i-� P�Rry 4 r,AG.0 7cTVRE 2 17 — SP�u1-AR 4,,,_- �.,‹ N < ,N? 0 W it Q .\,z. 1/4- 4 i SIL 1CATi ili .l) X65 F�F��►GTcR v u L Jg L£.5. Typ- 'sr m o 11111 �.TFc'T7 �cS-.K�T�jTA;NLE�� —� }-isRD 1 .5E-T .XR -*/S ! 44Tt-+ 14,TR. YSt...rrS \\.m.,- .iz 'In6&rr ,L�1'cST c�c"t P''`fZT�`�=►SET (41.) . ‘ ID o 1-4P5 1 7a::,V f -LAST U.L. ,�FPitCET� 4,...,5 0,..... ._r ( >vtc a) �' < + S.9- 5E1- � 4."5 Z \ 'i.41, ...c. �(�11tz� QUI D15fJ>JECT PLurq 3 To 91...1 P FTI-" Ft GbNGRa T ITEMS SHOWN ON THE SHOP DRAWINGS MAT BE FURNISHED WITH CORRECTIONS SHOWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH ME lOLE0 s doting this duwinp i cu srlth tG.atementl ,evlcw dos of OM.50 mnde II the shop ilm.:t0�rs. Ihis ahu C:is•ooYln. 1.01• O tevycw do nol rdiow co,•uocta from com,.�•' z of rhe duw i.nl end coh..0.:h- d,.s'+'• t the wowed of pm:at.l cc rdormr...co th,i..l..rm:.twn r•Yi•.cii ir.i..•p end a end pleill, contVH••'cc wi: yosponstbl5 t:.....y.I ..br'cauon 0 ...d domni.li05Sy w•ots, 9 doc•menn. the c`i �s• ,: cenclebeS all gutsate C p.CCfief end lh...-t,o of _0drp..1,.mi.p haun.woreIn se 9 with .h_1 rl:.R Oho.b_dssy t aid sahstectot7 n..:oet. INC. • ROIERI A.ELLER ASSOCIATES, {� By �` x Dae —��II S _12-f q.,c) `76 fr. c Y f---/917(p 11 / NFei , .off er Prz& The paving contractor shall place concrete pavement around the base of the light standard after the pole has been placed. This will be constructed in a manner 101 as to aid in the structural integrity of the pole assembly. Install cables and conduit and continue 6 inch amounts of backfill and tamping until 2 inches above grade. Continously check the standard for verticle position with a plum bob during the above steps. If poor soil is encountered such as soft clay, loam, or poor soil containing large amounts of silt the engineer should be contacted for special backfill instructions . (1) Type A Units IThe luminaire/standard combinations shall be: 7* -C I igh i9g 'l;Marauet e) Ge�` Model o. MQ19 T=1}013-N=250S="2O.0 luminaire standard U or Keene Lighting (SAR)/Union Metal Concrete Standards Model No. SAR-253-L-XF-ARC luminaire Model No. 700-P35-WF-613 standard or Kim Lighting (EKG)/Ameron Concrete Cat. No. 1A/MOD/EKG 401/250 HPS-120V/CTBS-LS luminaire Cat. No. SK-34/FL/MK-SSIO/EL-A/CB/GFI/DE/CTBS/GL embedded/standard or Spaulding Lighting/Stress Crete Concrete Model No. HT11-250-HPS luminaire Model No. TEC-42-C-X-0-CSA-SF-140-OCT base-E10 standard or the approved equal Contractor shall furnish two extra standards and luminaires to the City. I 11'13 APR 2 7 92 t-c? 111 Thak.Pub.Utilities Comm. I rA-LL POLE-s FIXTURE TD FE1 MOUIJ lE D 180° CAST ALUM. TOP CAP TO 14.1-I. W/(2)3/8 Y" _ 1'I S.S. BOLTS- V III (2 )IN LONG Y 3.1/211 O.D. HALF TUBING - t Ta to ii(2)1/C DIA.: I" 17 THREADED ' : Ij1WIDE x 142" CDJPLING 3"0.C• EM TO I•I/4"TAP ED • �'...,�• : WIRE 110.E 31.1/2• • VEO - 9 TYPE-A) I. _1 LE 0 iGCLLAII IDLE WT, —1,500 LBS 141ve.o.staE .O (1n) REGD. `.Zl NOTE: ARCHITECT TO SPECIFY FINISH. ((013) 14I T,IA.MOLt3 LOCATED ON • 0 f•CIV 3-1/1"OIA. VW GYCL[ 1 �J 11 M iFES-100N OUTLET 1.CM MOL[ ca O° TO H.N. E-- -- ( [V.1eI..E < i-; .Ci Li POLE TOP MOUNT DETAIL • 11,u1 sNo•.N nM IPI sllor Dti�5;wM yl/.(C4iD.aCf'.11111 IIMlY� wY al d ::1M: •1'.. ..1�.�`.. •• 1/2•CLCAA COvin (TM ‘:::t":::;',:..1". ^e'� � .,..,Ls,L.ssoa„ .vrc. 1[1.2rACSTRESfnO MEI. *MU Af/Y •-•21 - ' 1i1_I 1-31n•.ALL Ir?3 3/8m x I 1 BRASS A._T_., _ �I (.3RUUUDING LUG IN H.N. FRAME SA.[IZ Sr1AAL HAND MOL[` _ /ITCH,AST* A.12 S •Y[ uLO OA 1 0 5P14•L HIVE [AYE COMM ASTM A.ft • Milt CLAMP/Y `_.— i'•I/4"x 7"HANUHOL.E I fW/CAST ALUM. TYPICAL POLE SECTION 10" DIA. 11-_-_,------ FRME_ 4 COVER y�i�ENTRIANCES,1( ) 'CABLE° Er(I)Q 270° I 1,I) RE:CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MN. -ilii[ I'' CENTRECON, Inc. VEO- .9 S(`13) 1130 NORTON AVE. [V[RE TT WA.0[200 „mow, NE P.O.OO[ 211 12051 23[•2010 • N0. REVISION OAI( 1 Q-4 .54-IIJ°N.J-7:01-1 /illP °Al E£3 _)/h:a .I-$I(7j.1 gllll On. Sr OWE.NO. .— CA.OE J-6103-1 F A a N i N p� I 19" SQ. a � 0 PLAN VIEW 6" 1 EXISTING POLE, (SPECIFY IF ROUND OR SQUARE) ELEVATION VIEW IF ROUND, GIVE (TYPES "A-1" & "A-2") CIRCUMFERENCE AT POINT OF ATTACHMENT LUMINAIRE SPECIFICATIONS SO THAT ARM MAY BE HOUSING: 19" SQ. X 6" HIGH ONE-PIECE MITER BEND EXTRUDED ALUMINUM RADIUSSED TO FIT. WITH ALUMINUM CANOPY FORMED TO THE HOUSING. REFLECTOR: DIE-FORMED ONE-PIECE ALUMINUM FORMING A SEALED OPTICAL ASSEMBLY WITH DOOR FRAME. TO PROVIDE A TYPE III I.E.S. DISTRIBUTION PATTERN. DOOR FRAME: EXTRUDED ALUMINUM WITH E.P.D.M. GASKET. DIFFUSER: CLEAR REFRACTOR ACRYLIC. • ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS o„t,•t ,7 : w BALLAST: 250 WATT/120 VOLT, C.W.A. CORE AND COIL MOUNTED IN LUMINAIR . aa,,..,y' ,a,°"J�n awa.G:°.,.::n•Fw+rte �,,,��,,r,� �--,�•'";M;;,': LAMPHOLDER: PORCELAIN MOGUL BASE. LAMP: 250 WATT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM, BY OTHERS. �1 t• n tw`"ter ,v,...0 .'' '^;'°K. �'"'�'"o..e..:..w•.J:.,•"d° �sat. MOUNTING SPECIFICATIONS ARM: 2" X 4" X 8" LONG EXTRUDED RECTANGULAR ALUMINUM. °"' Y��►► TIE-RODS: (2) 1/2"-13 CADMIUM PLATED STEEL. BACK-UP PLATE: 7 GA. STEEL WITH (2) 1/2"-13 CAPTIVATED NUTS. NOTE: SEE IS-2989 FOR MOUNTING PLATE. FINISH FACTORY APPLIED DARK BRONZE BAKED ACRYLIC ENAMEL. ( JOB NAME "CITY OF SHAKOPEE" M/PROJECT N4 M# 148887 SEM REVISION OATS AUTN1 DR CR rjro o �o o � ( ^ 1\ 11003 DMES STERNER LIGHTING SYSTEMS INCORPORATED 09-02-87 /I�, MARQUETTE TO MOUNT TO EXISTING POLE Winsted,Minnesota 55395(612)473-1251 C BERNHAGEN SCALE E1 DWG.NO. " 2Pp- 32293- 00 ) "360,1 Ire, COOPER UTILITY LIGHTING 50-400 Watt OVX Single Door • 281/4w ill 11V4" 46411 Fixture Width=131/4" • - • . :- Specification Features • Die-cast aluminum housing&aoor • Fixed-in-place birdguard • Oast-in pipe stop&level rg s:2ps • Die-cast two-position latcn • Anodized aluminum rerlector • ANSI wattage source•aces • Grey polyester powder coat finish' • Encapsulated starter • Porcelain lamp socket • Removable refractor • Pastic terminal block • Two-bolt/one bracket slipritter Ordering Information Catalog Number Logic 1st,2nd&3rd Digits= 4th&5tn Digits= 6th Digit= 7th Digit= 3th C;gt= atr : '= 0:n 0 c.t= i to-15th Digits= Product Family Lame''/attage Lame Type- Ballast Type- `/c,tage- 0 str ...:on Cct'or.s *OW 50=50W S=HPS C=CWI =12 01/ ce =CASCO -=Pho:occntrc; 70=.0W V=,1ercur; =Reactor HPF 0=2CEV ,ce :l Peceotace 1C=1C0W D.1=Metai Haze M=Magnetic Regulator 4=240V `'.ce.1-1 .'av 13=13.3W- N=rfi Reactance NPF =277`✓ 'Omer cc stn .,ons&c..:c-s 17=-75W 5W R=Reactor NPF 3=480V A.aace. Consu,t act 20=2COW SV=CNA F=120.2-0:vireo '20V 25=250W P=Hi Reactance HPF P=240.v,PCR•.wren '20`i 24=250/400 wirea 250 K=10KV CWA- W=Muiti-tac.:.mea ' 40=400W N=Muiti-taa..v,rec 27-V 42=400,250 wired 400 Catalog Lamp Lamp Ballast Photometric Input Net Wt. Shipping Number Wattage Type Type Voltage Distribution Watts (Lbs.) Volume OVX5OSR22E4 50 HPS React.NPF 120 II MSCO 60 13 Pac'ee OVX7OSR22E4 70 HPS React.NPF 120 II MSCO 62 12. ''cm. OVX1OSR22E4 100 HPS React.NPF 120 II MSCO ::8 15 3.5 cu. ".. OVX15SR22E4 150' HPS React.NPF 120 II MSCO 175 16 OVX2OSCW2E4 200 HPS C'.VI Multi-Tap II MSCO , 28 '':r AA. Ft, ` `250 .,a.'`n HPS :. :. - 'Multi-Tap.. .:-Ill MSC0* t .";297 . ' Ot` `! AT' , '�F , �400 ''""�F1PS CWA Multi-Tap III MSCO •dE5 5 OVX24SWW3E4 250/400 HPS CWA Multi-Tap III MSCO 297 35 OVX42SWW3E4 400;250 HPS CWA Multi-Tap III MSCO 465 35 OVX1OVN22E4 100 Merc. Hi React.NPF 120 II MSCO 122 18 OVX17VN22E4 175 Merc. Hi React.NPF 120 Il MSCO 217 19 OVX17VWW2E4 175 Merc. CWA Multi-Tap II MSCO 204 21 OVX25VWW3E4 250 Merc. CWA Multi-Tap III MSCO 295 26 OVX40VWW3E4 400 Merc. CWA Multi-Tap III MSCO 450 33 OVX17MWW2E4 175 Met.Hal. CNA Multi-Tap II MSCO 210 28 OVX25MWW3E4 250 Met. Hal. CWA Multi-Tap III MSCO 295 31 OVX40MWW3E4 400 Met. Hal. CWA Multi-Tap III MSCO 460 35 filo ' Other finish colors available.Consul factory. ' 150 watt units are for S55 lamp. NOTE:Acrylic is standard on units 50 watt through 150 2Refer to technical section for tamp'oallasv'voltage <Avadaole in 120/240 dual voltage or single voltage only, watt HPS and 175 watt mercury Glass is standard on 200 compatibility. (120.208,240,277,or 480)50-150 watt. watt.250 watt and 400 watt units. EPA(Effective Projected Areal.87 Square Feet ROADWAY JOSLYN Manufacturing Co. Luminaire Supports Standard Steel Luminaire Supports 0 for Wood Poles (continued) Hot Dip Galvanized r A Mg B '1t "STh UPSWEEP WITH 2 TIE RODS C Illt Dimensions Pole q _ ��t� Nominal Attachment Horizontal Rise Centers lb Length(Ft) (Inches) (Inches) Weight Catalog No. A B C (Lbs.each) J738 SERIES J738010 10 27 6 41.0 J738012 12 35 8 48.0 J738014 14 43 10 54.0 J738016 16 51 12 61.0 J738018 18 59 14 67.0 A 1 *' 1-1/4"A-FRAME WITH 1 TIE ROD 8 11111 " Dimensions Pole Nominal Horizontal Rise Centers Attachment I �� Length(Ft.) (Inches) (Inches) Weight l IW Catalog No. Lj,yy, B C Lbs VS r E, 1 014 �.y:. nn each) i(:, x YY.tee 7( C J743 SERIES 43012 12 4• 20 45.0 J743014 14 51 22 52.0 J743016 16 56 24 62.0 J743018 18 61 26 71.0 J743020 20 66 28 85.0 NOTE: For grounding lug assembly(J771018), add suffix "G" to standard catalog numbers.(Example:J743020G) 01996 Joslyn Manufacturing Co.•9200 W.Fullerton Avenue•Franklin Park.IL 60131•Phone:312-625.1500/800-323-0742•FAX:800-443-7380•International FAX:312-625-0090 LS-3 American Electric Security light Package The luminaire package is shipped as a unit package.Each package is placed in one shipping , carton and contains the following material required to satisfactorily complete the installation. • • • A universal die cast aluminum NEMA head available with 100,or 150 watt high ", M ressuresodium,or100wattor175watt mercu ballast. '_ �� ' a '` ` '•.ti•`' - • Luminaire is supplied with a 5 ft,#14 lead wire;one black,one white for 120 volt and ; _eq.., , .,-t,:-.1 = two black,one white for 240 volt. • • Type V distribution reflector-refractor assembly—acrylic. � • One photoelectric control for 120 volt circuit and 1,000 watt capacity. - • Either a high pressure sodium or mercury DX lamp. "� • , • One aluminum pipe bracket measuring 11/4 x 24". x '" s-x `^ - 1 • Mounting bracket hardware: -*`•••,•,.:. {it? t - . 1. One 5/8 x 10"thru bolt with square washer and nut. .�' -' - ; • 2. Two lag screws. 6► Si,= `=�d '1 •I,e ailIPMSNMENINI , .., :....140, "- r . y, Catalog Number Watts Source Volts Ballast Type Bracket Length,In. I Refractor LUMINAIRE/BRACKET 1111Mgitkitik.i5fle,4100' 4 ,HPS to i .'_'" •;120 4 { ",Reactor r • 24 "--,14:4*Nalaf 11-57065-61PKGB 150 HPS 120 Reactor 24 TypeV 11-01825-61PKGB 175 Mercury DX 120 Lag 24 Type V 11-01835-61PKGB 250 Mercury DX 120 Lag 24 Type V LUMINAIRE ONLY* Mr 1'"v`- ,. 100 ':- -L HPS a:- _ ' " 120 .:< Reactor_ _ -,,.--- ,t TYPe. .r;Vk''. 11-57065-6 150 HPS 120 Reactor — TypeV 11.1825-6 175 Mercury 1220 Lag — Type V ' Excludes arm,lamp,wiring,and photocontrol. REPLACEMENT PARTS Catalog Number Description womb SD-55-BVH HPS starter board f' 01-01820 175 W ballast mercury 120 V 01-01830 250 W ballast mercury 120 V V 11-01820 175 W ballast and head mercury 120V 11-57060 150 W HPS ballast and head 120 V ¢' ��_ 11-57010-0000A 100W HPS ballast,head,and lamp 120V f 11-57010 100 W HPS ballast and head 120 V /� 11-5-6 Optical assembly / Alkiiiiiii4& '.."4- ”. `.err-•r. _* r- 1'``- • July 1993 PResc13. Lighting 2 6ft. MAST ARM SeriesMaledAteaite® BO, BA, BB, DIRECT BURIAL BC, BD, BHS/, At SINCE 1897 BS, BX POLE DIAMETER STANDARD RECOMMENDED MAX.SIZE OF EACH LUMINAIRE 4, NOMINAL WEIGHT HANDHOLE CATALOG MOUNTING SHAFT (LBS.I SHAFT SHAFT LOCATION WEIGHT 80 MPH 90 MPH 100 MPH NUMBER 9" HEIGHT LENGTH INCLUDES TOP BASE FROM BASE (LBS.) EPA' EPA' EPA' JC (FT) (FT) ARM(SI (IN) (INI (IN) PER IUM (SO.FT) (SO FTI (SO Fl) E.WITI ONE MAST ARM1 16 19---".6-53-471.- 6.5 66 75 3.2' 3.2' 3.2' 8019.10 18 , 21' 57 4.1 6.8 66 75 3.2' 3.2' 3.2' B021.10 20 23' 65 4.1 6.8 66 75 3.2' 3.2' 2.9 6023.10 20 221" 78 4.6 7.3 66 75 3.2' 3.2' 3.2' 8}'124-16 22 25' 71 4.1 6.8 66 75 3.2' 3.2' 2.4 8025.10 22 25' 85 4.6 7.3 66 75 3.2' 3.2' 3.2' BH25-10 25 28'9" 92 4.5 8.3 78 75 3.2' 3.2' 2.4 BS30-16 ' 25 281" 124 4.7 8.4 78 75 3.2' 3.2' 3.2' BH30.16 30 331" 105 4.5 83 78 75 2.6 1.5 0.7... BS35-16 i 4:1''.-....':•',:i; c,: 4431:111,7-X +.' -,8 4 78 5 0111.1;;' a 'L4 t2" 3.2'i°',BH35-16f 35 39'9" 183 6.2 11.7 90 75 3.2' 3.2' 3.2' BA41-16 40 45'9" 210 6.2 11.7 102 75 3.2' 3.2' 1.8 BA47-16 40 45'9" 292 6.4 11.8 102 75 3.2' 3.2' 3.2' BB47-16 SHAFT LIGHT POLE WITH TWO MAST ARMS LENGTH 20 23' 75 4.1 6.8 66 75 2.2 1.2 0.6 8023-20 25 281" 102 4.5 8.3 78 75 1.6 0.8 - 8S30.26 • 25 28'9" 134 4.7 8.4 78 75 3.2' 3.2' 3.2' BH30-26 30 33'9" 155 4.7 8.4 78 75 3.2' 2.9 1.9 8H35-26 30 33'9" 198 4.9 8.5 78 75 3.2' 3.2' 3.2' BX35-26 • 35 391" 193 6.2 11.7 90 75 2.8 1.7 0.7 BA41-26 35 39'9" 265 6.4 11.8 90 75 3.2' 3.2' 2.6 BB41-26 35 391" 308 6.6 11.9 90 75 3.2' 3.2' 3.2' BC41-26 40 459" 220 6.2 11.7 102 75 2.0 1.0 - BA47-26 40 459" 302 6.4 11.8 102 75 3.2' 3.1 1.7 8B47-26 O 40 45'9" 351 6.6 11.9 102 75 3.2' 3.2' 3.2' BC47.26 LIGHT POLE WITH FOUR MAST ARMS 18" STD. 25 28'9" 122 4.5 83 78 75 1.1 0.5 - BS30-46 25 28'9" 154 4.7 8.4 78 75 3.2' 3.1 ^ 2.2 BI-130-46 .M� 30-46 1, 25 28'9" 193 4.9 8.5 78 75 3.2' 3.2' 3.2' 8X30.46 30 33'9" 187 6.2 10.9 78 75 3.2' 23 1.5 BA35-46 • t . 30 331" 248 6.4 11.0 78 75 3.2' 3.2' 3.1 8B35.46 35 39'9" 213 6.2 11.7 90 75 1.9 1.1 0.5 BA41-46 35 391" 285 6.4 11.8 90 75 3.2' 2.7 1.7 BB41-46 35 39'9" 328 6.6 11.9 90 75 3.2' 3.2' 3.2' BC41-46 40 451" 322 6.4 11.8 102 75 3.2' 2.1 1.1 BB47-46 Y �► 40 451" 371 6.6 11.9 102 75 3.2' 3.2' 2.6 BC47-46 40 451" 444 6.9 12.0 102 75 3.2' 3.2' 3.2' BD47-46 (0) 'Poles are not rated above 3.2 EPA as the mast arms are not rated for luminaires greater than 3.2 EPA. EPA recommendations are calculated per AASHTO Standards and include a 30%gust factor.See Post Top section tri r EPA rations without arms Calciil?tinns are hasarl nn poles with h2nriholes YF:•.«'.:I•• r. • -. .,... r. ...Vl vol.: .IM yr. • . . • •Cpt*Number . ,•. • • ' !:..„.•••; • tuxrnaster. powerA.(Lia WaRaama cls eeltaet tYoe Peas Vit.0.De,) 8ecaptede {. { • •RPS CUTOFF LUMINAIRE 100 WATT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM •i 1.P Cu o 1 I 240/27e _ • . • 2401277' Lag Auto High 27 53.6F112-AJ • 120 Regulated High 27 .53-56212-AJ • Luminai r • 120 • Reactor High 22 53-55912-AJ• 120 Reactor Normal 19 53-57012-AJ • High Pressure Sodium • 208 Regulated High . 27 53-564124.) 70 to 400 Watts 240 'Regulated High 27 53-56312-AJ SERIES 53/54&153/154 240 Lag Auto Normal 27 53.57312-AJ ' 4277 Regulated High 27 53.58512-AJ • 480 Regulated High 27 53-58812-AJ r • • y: EPS CUTOFF LUMINAIRE 150 WATT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM t:`<: 120/206' ":? 240/277* Lag Auto High 28 53-5F162-AJ • - , . --_ 120 Regulated High 28 53-58282-AJ •'° 120 Reactor High 22 53-55962-AJ • 120 Reactor Normal 19 53-57082-AJ FEATURES 208 Regulated High 28 53-55482-AJ .240 Regulated High 28 53-58362-AJ t •Dle cast aluminum housing for long-life performance 240 • Lag Auto Normal 28 53-57362-AJ •Low profile,cul-off configuratlon.presents a contemporary 277 Regulated High • 28 53.58562-AJ silhouette 480 Regulated High 28 53-58862-AJ •Power-Pads electrical system for Installation and mainte- EPS CUTOFF LUMINAIRE 200 WATT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM Hance ease • i •"Breathing seal".,developed by American Electric for 120 Regulated High 40 163.062J3-AJ . . filtering.contaminants from entering optical assembly 208 • Regulated . High 40 153-064J3-AJ t *Ideal for applications: 240 Regulated High ' 40 153.063J3-AJ • • Parking.lots 277 Regulated High 40. 153-065J3•AJ' i; Roadways Malls '480 Regulated High 40 153-088J3-AJ :Shopping Centers "MULTI-VOLT LUMINAIRES:All multi-volt iuminelres are prewired for 120 volt • Corporate Headquarter Complexes operation but are easily fiaid-reconnectable for 208,240 or 277 volt opentlon. • Hospitals • • NOTES Ordering Data • 1.STANDARD DISTRIBUTION for TO lb 150 weft units Is IES TYPE II.Also • available in 1E8 TYPE ID.To order,change the last number before the High Pressure Sodium suffix from 2 to 3.(Example:53-5F112-AJ to 53.5F113-A1) • '. Primary Catalog Number ApDro�, tom PaatOCantro1 2.STANDARD FINISH la Dark Bronze-other colors available,contact vest NW True lector Ht.Iu0 Receptaau factory If required,• HPS CUTOFF LUMINAIRE 70 WATT 111011 PRESSURE SODIUM 3.PHOTOELECTRIC CONTROLS and LAMPS are not included.Order 120/208 separately. • 240/277' Lag Auto High 26 53.5F1 E2-AJ • 4•FIXTURE WITHOUT PHDTOCONTAOL RECEPTACLE maybe ordbred by 120 Regulated High 25 63-562E2-AJ • changing the catalog number prefix from 53 to 54,or 153 to 154. • (Example:53.5F1E2-AJ to 54-5F1E2-AJ4 .• 120 Reactor High 22 53-559E2-AJ 5.50 HERTZ BALLAST(control gear)is available for all luminaires.Contact • 120 Reactor . Normal 19 53.570E2-AJ factory'for Information. 208 Regulated High : 25 53-584E2-AJ 0 100 WATT HPS unit with 100 VOLT LAMP Is available,contract factory for Information. 240. . Regulated High 25 53-583E2-AJ 7.240 VOLT LUMINAIRES•with photoelectric control receptacles are wired .v 240 La9 Auto Normal' 25 53-573E2-AJ for 240 volts to the receptacle. •.... 277 Regulated High 25 53.565E2-AJ • 8.For more information contact your local American Electric representa- 480 Regulated High 25 53-588E2•AJ r Uve. • ;il .. 14 ' 0 . : . . • Thomasf Betts -29- aer8 60:t7T S66T—LT—TT Ira. . tti tireitodium= Options/Accessories Catalog Number >. •Rimm Poen Acme. vetePomo:duol vnn : West toe Rom int.uoa.t Receptacle Factory Installed Upon Request . a i !l/i4 WS CUTOFF LUMINAIRE 260 WATT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM.• •Level Indicator X1.;".'At s= *Twist-Lock Photocontroi Receptacle .�.T7:{fit Melted` HI•h 42- 153.0H133•AJ I (Photocontrol not Included) t 0 =eguiated High 42 153-08233-AJ •Lightning Arrestor 208 ' Regulated High 42 153.08433-AJ •Hinge Keeper 240 Reactor High 40 153-05833-AJ •Decorative Colors P. • 240 Regulated High 42 153-06333-AJ •Fusing 277 Regulated ' High 42 153-06533-AJ Field Installed r f 480 Regulated High . 42 153-08833-AJ •Decorative Rectilinear Arm I i- •HPS CUTOFF LUMINAIRE 310 WATT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM I s 120 Regulated High 42 153.062L3-AJ 1'41}1 1-11---*-- D—1'1 ' 208 Regulated High 42 153.064L3-PJ1 ( 04,., 240 Regulated High 42 153-063L3-AJ It tt 277 Regulated High 42 163-065L3-AJ r TENON •f 480 . Regulated High . 42 153-066L3•AJ et-2%-►I 2"IPS l HPS CUTOFF LUMINAIRE 400 WATT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM ENO VIEW BIOE VIEW 1 120/208 (f.. 240/277' Regulated High 45 153-0H143-AJ Cemenseon 120 Regulated High 45 153-06243-AJ estates Ntmhw A 0 C 0 t t.. 53-1-H,for 70-150W 2.031" 2.781" 3.25" 8" lo 208 Regulated High 45 153.06443-AJ i :'153.1-H,for 200-400W 2.031" 3.631" 4" "10 240 Reactor High 43 153-05843-AJ v. NOTE:Pole must be drilled to match dimensions shown. �> 240 Regulated High 45 153-08343-AJ i F 277 Regulated High . 46 153-08543-AJ •Decorative Wall Mount Bracket 480 Regulated High 45 153.08843-AJ 0F 'MULTI•VOLT LUMINAIRES:All mulU•voit luminaires are prewired for 120 volt FRONT VIEW .i t• operation but are eeally fold-reconeectable for 208,240 or 277 volt operation. X 4 1 1.... '-� ;11 ►boa. �,� ... .-L.t � j H rt Om BACK VIEW t • 1'DIITRIBUTION for 250,310 and 400 watt ohs Is lES'TYPE ill only. ►'�8•e. MOUNT BRACKET ` 2.STANDARD FINISH Is Dark Bronze-other colors available,contact 810E VIEW ;I' factory II required. Catalog NumouA 80lmem oil o t 3.PHOTOELECTRIC CONTROLS and LAMPS are not Included.Order e•� « • ,� "r : e. separately. 41 63-1-W-H,for 70-150W 5.687 4.687 2.781 2.031• •s, 4.FIXTURE WITHOUT PHOTOCONTROL RECEPTACLE may be ordered by 153.1-W H,for 200-400W 5.687"4.687"3.531"2.031" changing the catalog number prefix from 153 to 164.(Example:153- NOTE:Surface mutt be drilled to match dimensions shown. OH1334.1 to 154.011133•A1) 5.00 HERTZ BALLAST(control pear)is available for all luminaires.Contact •Pole Mount Plate t factory for Information, • • Catalog No.53-1-H-WM 1` 1 8..150 WATT HPS unite with 100 VOLT LAMPS are available,contact for Series 53 'o•.t WIREWAY t r• factory for Information, Catalog No. 153-1-H-W M 12112 - 7,240 VOLT LUMINAIRES wtih photoelectric control receptacles are wired for Series 153 - for 240 volts to the receptacle. 0.s THRU hOLT 1 S.Far more information contact your local American ElectrIc representa• POLE MOUNT PLATE �/ ;: .tivi. •Polycarbonate Shield(for flat lens only) ' { Catalog No.53-8/SHIELD for Series 63'a` ':,. Catalog No.153.8/SHIELD for Series 153 •Poles—Steel,Aluminum,Wood,and Fiberglass are avail- I, able. For ordering data,refer to the Pole section of this I catalog, i ' 111) 1 ThamasWetts AV. I",. -30 • S0'd 92):17T S66T—LT—TT ROUND TAPERED Series s e BA, BB, BC, BD, SINCE 1897 DIRECT BURIAL BH, BS, BX ,, POLE DIAMETER STANDARD RECOMMENDED TOTAL LOADING NOMINAL HANDHOLE CATALOG MOUNTING SHAFT SHAFT SHAFT LOCATION 00 MPH 90 MPH 100 MPH 120 MPH NUMBER 1.1 HEIGHT LENGTH WEIGHT TOP BASE FROM BASE WEIGHT EPA' EPA* EPA' EPA' (FT) (FT) ILBS i (IN) (IN) (IN( (LBS.) (SO FT) (SO.FTI (SO FT.) SO FTI DAxRQ;P13LEOONSTRUCTION fBS) 10" 2.9' 5.0 54 150 16.3 12.5 9.9 6.7 BS13" 12" 15 29 2.9 5.3 54 150 10.7 7.9 6.1 4.1 8S15* 13" 16 30 2.9 5.5 54 150 10.2 7.6 5.9 3.9 BS16" / 13 17 33 2.9 5.6 66 150 10.2 7.6 5.9 3.9 BS17" 404 *2.9;A?- 57 #116 :150 * Y 97 :71 56' 37 r. ,BS181 16" 20 44 2.9 6.1 66 100 7.3 5.3 4.i 2r "BS20" 16 20 60 4.6 7.3 66 200 16.2 12.6 10.1 6.7 BH2O F,.'51,k1K9 r = 6.666 A '<100 ° *A.1�x ;: 4.6 i 3b;�,`Itt2 2n-iW24�r 24 72 7.3 66 200 112 8i' -g.8.. 4.5- 8F12r 25 30 82 4.4 8.3 78 100 6.2 4.7 3.6 2.2 BS30 25 30 114 4.6 8.4 78 200 14.5 11.2 8.9 5.9 BH30 25 30 153 4.8 8.5 78 300 20.1 15.7 12.5 8.2 BX30 25 30 185 6.4 10,4 78 300 23.2 18.2 14.3 9.0 BB30 25 30 217 6.6 10.5 78 300 33.5 26.2 20.8 13.6 BC30 SHAFT LENGTH 30 35 95 4.4 8.3 78 100 3.7 2.6 1.9 0.8 BS35 30 35 135 4.6 8.4 78 200 10.5 8.0 6.2 3.8 BH35 30 35 178 4.9 8.5 78 300 14.8 11.4 9.0 5.6 BX35 30 35 216 6.4 11.1 78 300 19.7 15.2 11.7 7.1 BB35 30 35 253 6.6 11.2 78 300 28.7 22.4 17.4 11.0 BC35 30 35 309 6.9 11.3 78 300 37.4 29.1 22.9 14.8 8035 35 41 179 6.2 11.7 90 300 8.1 6.0 3.9 1.3 BA41 35 41 253 6.4 11.8 90 300 143 10.8 7.8 4.0 BB41 35 41 297 6.6 11.9 90 300 21.8 16.6 12.5 7.2 BC41 35 41 362 6.9 12.0 90 300 29.0 22.1 17.0 10.3 8041 40 47 205 6.2 11.7 102 300 6.4 4.3 2.4 - BA47 40 47 290 6.4 11.8 102 300 12.2 " 8.8 6.0 2.5 BB47 40 47 340 6.6 11.9 102 300 19.2 14.1 10.4 5.4 BC47 40 47 415 6.9 12.0 102 300 25.8 19.3 14.5 8.3 BD47 18 STD. • Do Not Use For Side Mount Applications-Use BO Series • DO NOT USE WITH TENON MOUNTED ARMS OR FOR MULTIPLE FIXTURE APPLICATIONS-USE BO SERIES •*NOT AVAILABLE CAPPED. HANDHOLE: Standard 21/2" x 5" )11 Optional 2'/" Round,or 4" x 6" or 4"x 12" on Some Models TENONS: 2'/e",3"(4"on Some Models) All poles are polyurethane coated and individually wrapped.Flared base for installation stability and grommeted wire access hole standard. All EPA calculations are based on poles with handholes. 'EPA ratings for capped pole are same as for tenon pole. •EPA recommendations are calculated per AASHTO Standards and include a 30%gust factor. (� - i. Ordering Date µ , American . x i�t r, High Pressure Sodium Revolution Primary Power '�ADOrox. � with Photocontrol ' ' volts 'Ramat Type Factor Wt.(Lbs) Receptacle K: '..4'....'.- - AMERICAN REVOLUTION 50 WATT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM fra�li�l�ac�,.ur •• tt t' Mercury Vapor 120 Reactor Normal 32 247-57083-6 .L7v ;1A.. 100 to 175 Watts SERIES: 247/248 AMERICAN REVOLUTION 70 WATT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM - 120 Reactor Normal 34 247-570E3-6 120 Regulated High 38 247-562E3-6 208 Regulated High 38 247-564E3-6 �` 240 Lag Auto Normal 36 247-573E3-6 • - r -. 240 Regulated High 38 247-563E3-6y 277 Regulated High 38 247-565E3-6 480 Regulated High 38 247-566E3-6 A. ;�fe AMERICAN REVOLUTION 100 WATT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM ., \X24: r eactQc47:57013-6 '-..Mormal :- �' 240 Lag Auto Normal 37 247-57313-6 .,+'"'"• AMERICAN REVOLUTION 150 WATT HIGH PRESSUE SODIUM '47 120 Reactor Normal 36 247-57063-6 "' 240 Lag Auto Normal 38 247-57363-6 ".--44. Mercury Vapor Catalog Number Power Approx. with Photocarool 3Primary Vo Ballast Type Factor Wt.(Lbsl Receptacle . . • . • AMERICAN REVOLUTION 100 WATT MERCURY VAPOR FEATURES 120 Lag Auto Normal 26 247-1813-6 •All die cast aluminum housing for long life,strength and 120 Regulated High 28 247-1213-6 dependable service 208 Regulated High 28 247-1413-6 •Hinged top housing for easy lamping and maintenance 240 Reactor Normal 24 247-1613-6 •Traditional styling for complementing early American 240 Regulated High 28 247-1313-6 motifs 277 Regulated High 28 247-1513-6 •Quick,easy mounting to 2-3/8"to 3"O.D. poles 480 Regulated High 28 247-2513-6 •Ideal for applications: Residential streets NOTES Office Complexes 1.STANDARD DISTRIBUTION PATTERN is IES TYPE III,other patterns Campuses available.Contact factory. Parks .. 2.STANDARD FINISH is Black-other colors available.Contact factory. Condominium Complexes3.PHOTOELECTRIC CONTROLS and LAMPS are not included.Order separately. Hotels- 4.FIXTURE WITHOUT PHOTOCONTROL RECEPTACLE may be ordered by Motels • changing the catalog number prefix from 247 to 248.(Example:247-1823-6 to 248-1823-6) 5.50 HERTZ BALLAST(control gear)is available for all luminaires.Contact factory for information. 6.STANDARD DIFFUSER is acrylic.Polycarbonate diffusers are available,to • order,change the catalog number suffix to 8.(Example:247-1823-6 to 247-1823-8) 7.INCANDESCENT UNITS(150 watts maximum)are available.Contact factory. 8.BALLAST TYPES AND WATTAGES other than those listed are available. Contact factory. 9.For more information contact your local American Electric representative. AMER/CAN ELECTR/CT M Division of FL Industries Inc -49- goumaven 61s 18671 • (6011 14?1545 MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, Acting City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, City Engineer ).,, �/ SUBJECT: Vierling Drive Street Lights'"`'' DATE: November 8 , 1988 INTRODUCTION: Attached is a request from Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative regarding the installation of street lights on Vierling Drive. BACKGROUND: Last summer , staff discussed the concept of providing street lights on Vierling Drive due to its collector street status. At that time , the City Council directed staff to obtain cost estimates from both SPUC and the Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative ( MVEC ) for the installation of these additional street lights . The existing street light policy is for the developer or the City to pay for the installation of new street lights at the intersections only. Due to the fact that Vierling Drive is proposed to be a collector street with minimal accesses, staff felt that additional street lights would be warranted . The City Council agreed and consequently directed staff to obtain the cost estimates for the additional street lights . Attached is a response from the MVEC regarding the additional street lights on their portion of Vierling Drive. As indicated in their letter, the street lights would be spaced approximately 300 feet apart. This is the normal spacing that is currently provided for street lights in the part of Shakopee that is on the grid street pattern. The estimate as shown on the MVEC proposal is $10 ,000 .00 for placing the electric lines and street lights on this portion on Vierling Drive. The developer of Hauer ' s 4th Addition will pay for the street lights at the intersections of Emerald Lane and Jasper Road with 13th Avenue . SPUC has prepared a preliminary design for their portion of Vierling Drive, which is from Hauer' s 4th to the west . Their design is based on approximately 300 foot spacing also. This portion of Vierling Drive is not currently under any development, therefore, exact street intersections are not known at this time . Staff and the utility manager feel that street lights should not be placed on this portion of Vierling Drive until exact intersections are known. Therefore, they will be submitting a estimate to install street lights at the time that development occurs so that the placement of street light will occur at the intersections as well as additional spacing . LSPUC does feel that a street light should be installed at the intersection of Vierling Drive and County Road 17 and will be submitting _ILO yz request to City Council for payment to cover this item 04,0y L ftp If Council chooses to approve of the MVEC proposal and authorize the installation of street lights on Vierling Drive at 300 foot intervals , staff would like to remind Council that they will be committing themselves to pay for these additional street lights throughout the entire length of Vierling Drive as it goes from the east to the west along the entire route. ALTERNATIVES: 1 . Approve of the Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative request to install street lights on Vierling Drive for an estimated amount of $10 ,000 .00 . 2 . Deny the request. 3 . Request additional information or cost estimates based on some other criteria. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 , to enter into an agreement with Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative to install street lights on Vierling Drive at 300 foot intervals for an estimated amount of $10 ,000 .00 . ACTION REQUESTED; Move to direct the appropriate City officials to execute the agreement with Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative to install street lights on Vierling Drive from County Road 16 to Emerald Lane for an estimated amount of $10 ,000 .00 . DH/pmp VIERLING Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative • E • 20425 Johnson Memorial Drive, P.O. Box 125 C -4. : I Jordan, MN 55352 (612)492-2313 • Oc_tooer 13. 1.3G6 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Lave Hutton, City Engineer • City of Shakopee Thomas Graham 129-E-F i rst Ave. President 1 Shakopee. MN 5537 Henderson Dear Dave: Melvin Ische y Vice President ! Enclosed is Minnesota Valley Electric Cocoerat ive' s estimate Norwood i of charges to install and extend a street 1 ight i're system 'I along 13th Avenue from Co. Rd. 16 to Emerald Lane in Shakopee. Edward Halloran Sec rereasurer ri The lights are approximately 300' apart alternating from Le Center �t eitner side of the street. using 35' cc;ies with 12 foot mast My ron Boegeman arms. Either a 150 car 250 W HPS cobra head unit is available Shakopee at the same installation charge. The r,,crrthly rate would be $8. 75 for a 150w HPS and $11. 50 for a E50w HPS. MVEC will John Wagner { maintain the system providing re-lamoino and normal repair at New Prague no extra cost to the city. MVEC would own the lights and wire system and provide normal maintenance for the rate. We Rodney Marek do not see the need for a conduit system, therefore, no costs Montgomery have been included. George Stauff Kilkenny The costs provided are based on areas ore-graded but not sodded or planted with trees. Keep in mind that construc- John Carlson tion between N��vemoer 1 and May 1 is s'_i p )ect to winter Henderson charges. A copy of the street plans would be helpful in com- pleting this installation. We need to determine where tne Donald Frankhauser lights and wire are to be installed in tne boulevard. If re- Savage storat1on is necessary, we would suggest that the city handle this end of it, rather than pay for linemen to do landscaping GENERAL MANAGER. or re-s'-:ct i rirj. Roger Geckler _ _ Thai-k. you for contacting us for input on tne pry: iect. It 1s ri! i .. unde'r'standing other orooc.sals are tieing solicited on this cro- lect as well . Please keep in mind, the ori' lect is clear.i`, within MVEC.' s assigned service area and that we would oppose: any orocc•saI which would not include plans for the Cc..: oerat1vF to Provide the power for this system. Please call us if von_ have any questions. We look forward to working with you. Very truly yours. MINN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE on Jabs Coordinator LeveIopments/Com' 1 Accounts • Enclosures I. PHJ -_ RESOLUTION #272 A RESOLUTION CLARIFYING FACTORS USED IN THE DETERMINATION OF THE CONTRIBUTION FROM THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION TO THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE IN LIEU OF TAXES WHEREAS, ^'he Shakopee Public Utilities Commission and the Shakopee City Council did meet in joint session and did agree on the classification of factors in the determination of the annual contribution as described in Shakopee Public Utilities Commission Resolution #193, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the calculation shall be as follows: GROSS SALES: ELECTRIC: WATER: Residential Electric XX Residential Water Heating XX Rural Sales XX Rural Water Heating XX Commercial Sales XX Customer Penalties XX Power Adjustment XX Water Pumping XX Water Sales XX Total Gross Sales XX XX COST OF ENERGY: Wholesale Electric XX Power for Pumping _ XX Total Cost of Energy XX XX Gross Margin XX XX Times 23.77% .2377 .2377 Payment to City XX XX Passed in adjourned regular session of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission this 15th day of March, 1984. President: Wallace Bishop ATTEST: Barbara Men en, Commission Secretary wb RK StSS iody CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor& City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Street Bituminous Overlay Assessment Policy DATE: February 21, 1997 INTRODUCTION: At the January 7, 1997 City Council meeting, Council discussed the merits of proceeding with a street reconstruction's project versus a street overlay project for 1997. Further discussion was held, in particular to the funding sources and whether to assess 25% of the overlay to property owners. A motion was made to discuss the funding and special assessments for street overlays to a work session. This memorandum will outline the pros and cons of assessing a bituminous overlay improvement project to benefiting property owners. BACKGROUND: The current City Assessment Policy has no assessments for bituminous overlays and seal coats, but rather funded by the Pavement Preservation Fund. The Pavement Preservation Fund is funded by general tax levy funds and is in the Street Division. Bituminous overlay projects have been done over the past years, such as the 10th Avenue and Swift Street overlay, once a lateral storm sewer system was installed in this area. Staff had proposed at the January 7, 1997 Council meeting to consider a larger street overlay project, as a pavement management strategy, to extend the pavement life of street pavements in the City of Shakopee. A bituminous overlay is considered a structural maintenance improvement to the existing bituminous pavement, in which a pavement life can be extended from 10 - 20 years. This type of pavement rehabilitation selection is best applied to a pavement that is 15 - 20 years of age, and does not have extensive alligator cracking or severe load related distresses in the pavement. Bituminous overlays are one rehabilitation pavement strategy in order to extend the life of the pavement, versus the option of allowing the pavement to deteriorate with minimal maintenance until the street can be totally reconstructed. Staff is selecting streets to overlay that would be cost effective, and at the appropriate time in which the underground utilities are in good shape, and a total reconstruction project would not be necessary for several years. In discussions with Erland Lukanen, Braun Intertec Pavement Management Consultant, a bituminous street overlay if applied at the right time and at a recommended thickness of 2 inches can extend the life of the pavement from 15 - 20 years. One of the reasons for this extended pavement life of 15 - 20 years is the fact that much of Shakopee, in the current urban area, has good granular soils in which the pavement is constructed on. Staff has done a street overlay assessment policy survey of nearby Communities to indicate as to what level they assess for bituminous overlays and this is shown on Attachment No. 1. In this attachment, most of the Communities do not assess bituminous overlays, but pay for them out of the General Fund or Municipal State Aid Funds. In the case of Bloomington, they set up an Infrastructure Replacement Fund. The main reason, for no assessments on bituminous overlays, is this is considered a maintenance function and thus the 429 Special Assessment Procedure is not conducted for these projects. Staff has done a calculation on a typical street block in which a mill and overlay would be done on a bituminous pavement and is labeled Attachment No. 2. The cost calculated is as follows: A 25% assessment rate, assuming taking into account corner lot adjustments for City blocks, would be $3.00 per front foot. A typical lot width of 80 feet would then have an assessment of approximately $240.00 per lot. Staff estimates that approximately 2% - 4% of the project costs would be to administer the special assessments for preparing the feasibility report, conducting public hearings and preparing the final assessment rolls. The cost of administrating the special assessments would be approximately $.40 - $.80 per lineal foot for the bituminous overlay project. The factors to consider on whether to change the policy in regard to street overlays and to assess a portion of the project to benefiting properties should be as follows: • Is there a special benefit received from a bituminous overlay project to abutting properties? • Previous bituminous overlay projects have not been assessed. • Cost to administer the 429 Special Assessment Policy for this project. In staff's January 7, 1997 memo on the street overlay project consideration, outlines the pavement management cost to the City and the general tax levy put forth in association with street reconstruction projects, bituminous overlays, crack sealing and sidewalk repairs. Staff was initially proposing to combine the street overlay costs with another 429 assessment project, in order to have the funds for the project and paid over a period of time. This would be similar to a street reconstruction project, in which the 75% of the street reconstruction costs is funded by the City. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Do not change the assessment policy for bituminous overlay projects. 2. Provide direction to change the assessment policy for bituminous overlays, and to assess a certain percentage of the project costs to benefiting property owners. 3. Table for additional information. RECOMMENDATION: Staff does not have a recommendation as this is a policy decision on the funding of bituminous overlay projects. Staff would only point out that it appears that more Communities are considering bituminous overlays and maintenance operations, versus a major improvement project. ACTION REQUESTED: Discuss the street overlay assessment policy and provide staff direction on this issue. 4.6i7ey Bruce Loney Public Works Director BL/pmp OVERLAY ATTACHMENT NO. 1 STREET OVERLAY ASSESSMENT POLICY SURVEY CITY PROJECT ASSESSED Savage 0% Assessed, General Fund or MSA Prior Lake 40%Assessed Chanhassen 0% Assessed, General Fund or MSA Lakeville No Policy as yet Bloomington 0%Assessed, Infrastructure Replacement Fund Eagan 50% Assessed, City will obtain appraisals before and after to determine benefit Eden Prairie 0%Assessed, General Fund Hopkins 0%Assessed, General Fund ATTACHMENT NO. 2 1997 MILL AND OVERLAY PROGRAM STREET: HARRISON ST. 12TH - 13TH AVE. 900'X 38' UNIT TOTAL ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS QUANT. PRICE COST 1 ADJUST MH CASTING EA 4.00 $150.00 $600.00 2 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EA 3.00 $85.00 $255.00 3 PAVEMENT MILLING SY 1170.00 $1.60 $1,872.00 4 BIT. TACK COAT GAL 190.00 $1.00 $190.00 5 2341 WEAR-2"THICK TON 418.00 $25.00 $10,450.00 CONSTRUCTION COST= $13,367.00 10%CONTINGENCY= $1,336.70 SUBTOTAL= $14,703.70 25% ENG/ADMIN. = $3,675.93 GRAND TOTAL= $18,379.63 ASSESSABLE FRONT FOOTAGE= 1530 25%ASSESSMENT RATE= 18,379.63 x.25/ 1530= $3.00 PER FF TYPICAL LOT WIDTH=80'x 3.00/FF= $240.26 PER LOT PROJECT SUMMARY TOTAL ASSESSED COST= $4,594.91 TOTAL CITY COST= $13,784.72 GRAND TOTAL= $18,379.63