Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/16/1993 MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items DATE: March 12 , 1993 1. Attached is the Building Activity Report for February. 2 . Attached are the January 13th, February 1st and 8th, 1993 minutes of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 3 . Attached is correspondence from Janet Williams, Director of the Scott County Library System regarding their 1992 Annual Report. 4. Attached is correspondence from Certainteed regarding the odor at the Shakopee facility. 5. Attached is the Police Newsletter for Council review. 6. Attached are the February 17, 1993 minutes of the Shakopee Community Development Commission. 7 . Attached are the revenue and expense reports as of 2/28/93 . 8. Attached is the March 17, 1993 tentative agenda for the Energy and Transportation Committee. 9. 1 Attached are the March 4 , 1993 minutes of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals and the Planning Commission. 10. Attached is a memo from the City Planner advising of a public hearing on March 25, 1993 at 7: 30 P.M. The public hearing is on proposed land use plan amendments and will be conducted by the Planning Commission. Proposed changes to the Racetrack District are included. 11. Attached is a copy of SPUC Res. No. 396, Amending the Water Rates for the City of Shakopee. 12 . Attached is a memo from the Building Department addressing Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) Credits Forthcoming to the City. 13 . Attached is a memo from the Public Works Director updating City Council on the status of the Market Street/Minnesota Street Railroad Crossings. 14. Attached is a letter from Fred Corrigan, Executive Director, The Minnesota Transportation Alliance, regarding transportation funding legislation. / I CITY OF SHAKOPEE BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT - FEBRUARY 1993 February 1993 February 1992 No. No. Valuation No. No. Valuation Month Y.T.D. Y.T.D. Month Y.T.D. Y.T.D. Single Family-Sewered 8 13 1, 068,935 4 12 944,874 Single Family-Septic 1 2 168, 000 - 1 75,400 Multiple Dwellings 4 5 520, 179 3 4 405, 107 (# Units) (YTD Units) (8) (10) - (6) (8) - Dwelling Additions 1 3 36, 500 - 1 12, 000 Other - - - 1 1 1,500 New Comm. Bldgs - - - 1 1 85, 000 Comm. Bldg. Addns. 1 1 6, 000 - - - New Industrial-Sewered - - - - - - Ind. Sewered Addns. - - - - - - New Industrial-Septic - - - - - - Ind. Septic Addns. - - - - - Accessory/Garages - 2 31, 540 - - - Signs & Fences 3 9 11, 043 3 5 7, 300 Fireplaces/Wood Stoves - 1 1, 200 - - -- Grading/Foundation - - - - _ - Moving - - - Razing - - - - 1 12 , 380 Remodeling (Res. ) 2 3 6, 080 1 6 16,760 Remodeling (Inst. ) - - - - - Remodeling (Comm/Ind. ) 4 11 1,478, 125 1 8 1, 005, 000 TOTAL 24 50 3 , 327, 602 14 40 2, 565, 321 No. YTD. No. YTD. Electrical 39 83 34 65 Plumbing & Heating 35 64 22 67 Total dwelling units in City after completion of all construction permitted to date 4 , 817 . , CITY OF SHAKOPEE BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IN FEBRUARY, 1993 9814 Novak Fleck 1077 Aster Lane House 77,490 L 8 B 1, Meadows 7th 9815 SuperAmerica 1155 East 1st Avenue Sign 100 9816 DeMars Signs 835 West 1st Avenue Sign 2, 695 9817 C. I. Realty 1541-45 Roundhouse Cir. Twinhome 105,036 L 8 B 1, Eagle Creek Junction 3rd 9818 Dennis Hippen 2015 Foothill Trail Remodel 750 9819 Leslie Schultz 228 West 8th Avenue Window 1, 000 9820 Mike Menke 1060 So. Madison Addn. /Deck 24, 000 9821 Diane Sullivan 120 So. Holmes Sign 100 9822 Jack McGovern 124 So. Sommerville Remodel 4,500 9823 Goodwin Builders 1226 Prairie Lane House 140, 000 L 2 B 1, Prairie Estates 2nd 9824 Cletus Link 1440 W. 3rd Avenue Addn. 6,000 9825 C. I. Realty 1517-21 Roundhouse Cir. Twinhome 103, 369 L 5 B 1 Eagle Creek Junction 3rd 9826 C. I. Realty 1528-32 Roundhouse Cir. Twinhome 103,369 L 11 B 2, Eagle Creek Junction 3rd 9827 Ankeny Builders 1100 Shakopee Town Sq. Remodel 708, 000 9828 Perkins Restaurant 1205 E. 1st Avenue Remodel 65, 000 9829 Novak Fleck 936 Aster Lane House 70, 000 L 1 B 2, Meadows 7th 9830 Laurent Builders 1120 Polk Street House 70, 000 L 10 B 1, Minnesota Valley 7th 9831 Novak Fleck 1097 Aster Lane House 70, 000 L 9 B 1, Meadows 7th 9832 C. I. Realty 1544-48 Roundhouse Cir. Twinhome 103,369 ,. L 13 B 2 , Eagle Creek Junction 3rd 9833 Detail Home Bldrs. 1187 Heritage Drive E. House 67, 642 L 4 B 3 , Heritage Place 3rd 9834 Gerold Bros. Const. 823 Cortland Circle House 140, 000 L 1 B 9, Beckrich Park Estates 9835 Jerome Miller 485 Marschall Road Remodel 21, 000 9836 Novak Fleck 728 Dakota Circle House 72,892 L 1 & 2 B 6, Meadows 7th 9837 Novak Fleck 1362 Sage Lane House 72, 000 L 5 B 4, Meadows 7th Total: $2, 028,312 2 MTNUTFS OF THE �HAwDovR Pt1RT.TC TITTT.TTT MM; , .. . N (Special Meeting' The Shakopee Public Utilities convened in soec-iat_ sacsion on January 13 . 1991 at 4 : 30 P .M. in the Utilities meeting room. Mt:MRFRS PRESENT: mr i g i one rs K i.rchmp ier . Cook and O'Toole. Also liana. ger flan Hout Motion by Conk . Aa.,onded by O'Toole? to Adjourn. `n e7;-.1-- " ; 7.= Session for the o::rpe)s?s of oer$onnpl .1r.1 parform.3nce . M;^ti ,-Jn carried Motion by Gook, serondpd by ' Tool? to ?!3 ionrn from avocni- i ,;e ses:,i.on . Motion carrier' _ Motion by o'Toole . seconded by rook that the ''',- tin.:: ^� Ad4ourned. M- tion --arried . .TTF ST /.- -;_2 /4„,14,7 1....- T,c 7:^,r 'Rout . 14anacrer 1 I 2arbara Menden .-Co, ;mission Secretary MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION The Shaonee Public Utilities Commission convened in reaular session on February 1 . 1993 at 4: 30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Kirchmeier, Cook and O'Toole . Also Liaison Sweeney, Manager Van Flout and Secretary Menden . Motion by O'Toole , seconded by Cook that the minutes of the January 4 , 1993 regular meeting be approved as kept striking the word not from the street construction on Webster St . is being done at this time from 4th Avenue to 6th Avenue. Motion carried. BILLS READ: Post Office 75 . 00 City of ShakorSee 20 .032 . 00 ARA/Cory Refreshment Services 78 . 00 American Casting and Mfg. Corp. 378 . 60 American Test Center 1 , 200 . 00 R.W. Beck and Associates 6 . 581 . 61 Bentz Construction , Inc . 216 . 00 Border States Electric Supply 114 . 08 Business Essentials . Inc . 209 . 01 Burmeister Electric Co . 678 . 81 C & NW Transportation Co. 1 , 260 . 00 Chanhassen Lawn and Sports 532 . 29 City of Shakopee 258 ,898 . 04 City of Shakopee 335 . 22 City of Shakopee 899 . 69 City of Shakopee 84 . 43 City of Shakopee 115 . 17 Clay' s Printing Service 142 . 23 Cooperative Power Co. 45 , 235 . 65 Cy's Amoco and Tire Center 234 . 54 Deputy Registrar #135 5 , 563 . 31 Diamond Vogel Paint Center 89 . 89 Ditch Witch of Minnesota, Inc . 375 . 70 Dressen Oil Co. 269 . 25 Feed-Rite Controls, Inc . 1 , 340 . 33 General Office Products Co. 179 . 54 Genuine Parts Co . 20 . 60 Glenwood Inglewood 10 . 09 Gopher State One-Call . Inc . 234 . 64 Grayhar Electric Co . . Inc . 4 . 999 . 31 14 D Electric Co. 64 . 28 Hatch Company 103 . 09 Rance Cable Testing and Locating 214 20 Tr,nerial . Tnc . 9P 07 Lpef Pros . , Inc . 'NA . 22 Pay T,emeiux 57 nri N-V Thermoaas Co . 8 . 79 Minneaascn 173 . 03 Minn . Dept . of Natural Resources 3 . 258 . 00 7nvirnnTpntal Quality Board 447 . 86 Minn . Municipal Utilities Association 635 . 00 mirn . Valley Testina laboTtories , Inc . 770 00 M1-or Parts Service Co . , Inc . 287 . 44 Mitch Mullins 202 . 50 Northern Sanitary Supply . Inc . 28 . 76 Northern States Power Northern States Pnwer Co . 312 . F2 Northern Stat eq Power ( r1 1 . 107 . 47 Pitney Rowes 50 . 20 Power Process Equipment Tnr . 361 . 38 Reynolds welding Supply Co . 4 . 62 Serco laboratories 252 . 00 Shakopee Chevrolet OlOsile Pontiar- Inq 771 Shakopee Public Utilities commies'.° 266 . 26 Shakopee services . Inc . 41 F7 Simon-Midwest Tn- 89 . 315 . 86 Southwest SuburbPr. 314 . 09 Stars Cleaning Se'rvices . Tra- ' 77 . 47 Dean Struck 67 . 68 Total Too) 195 . 37 Louis Van Rout 59 . 65 Voss Lighting 985 . 21 Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. 976. 13 Woodhill Business Products 1 , 761 . 24 Yarusso ' s Fardwr,.= Co . 195 . 23 Master Electric 3 . 376 . 00 ABM Eouiprner;t and Supply . Inc . 425 . 00 Northern States Power Co . 386 , 509 . 39 Motion by Cook . seconded by O'Toole that the hills he allowed and ordered paid . Motion carried . Mr . Richard Brown , Plant Manager of Ladbrooke Racing was present to request the Commission remove the minimum hillina for a ten inch meter which would disable the fire system if it were disconnected . There also was a request made to remove the minimum billing for the electric billing also. The Commission will take both requests under consideration at the present time . A communication from Judy Cox confirming the reappointment of Terry O'Toole for a three year term expiring March 31 ,1996 . Liaison Sweeney gave the liaison report on certain issues discussed at length at the Council meeting. Kevin Favero , R .W. Beck was present for a discussion on the substation site. The sites have been narrowed down and some specific sites were favorable to the Commission . A recommendation was made to direct Mr. Favero to look into acauirina site 4 , looking at the typography, the vegetation , the costs to be incurred, the Ieast impact on development and to pursue at all speeds . Following the recommendation of our consultants . R.W. Reck and Associates Motion by Cook, seconded by O'Toole that the Commission ask R .W. Beck and staff to locate the best site in the area called site #4 in the January 22 , 1993 site selection criteria and have them look at the rectangles North and South of County Road 78 and West of Co.Rd . 17 looking at approximately 2 20 acre rectangles . That they locate the best site within that area and come back to the Commission with a recommendation as soon as possible . Motion carried . The Manager asked the Commission if there was any interest on their part for the Shakopee Public Utilities to take part in a feasibility study to pave the a ravel driveway and repave the parking area around the Shakopee Public Utilities Building . The Commission expressed interest and will take part in the feasibility study at this time. Manager Van Rout reported on the purchase of some cable to the low bidder in the amount of $17 , 500. 00 . A communication from Barry Stock regarding the downtown alleys and undergrounding the electric was given to the Commission by Manager Van Rout . A discussion followed as to many problems including cost , location of transformers, easements , etc. It is the recommendation of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission that some of these questions be answered before a joint meeting is scheduled. The electric rates will be increased early in 1993. The decals for the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission vehicles was discussed. It was recommended that we try and match the other trucks when we put a decal on the new truck. Motion by O'Toole , seconded by Cook to grant an exception to Canterbury Downs for their quarterly minimum water rate for the ten inch meter located in the Admin Building our Account Number 39-240 and bill an appropriate amount for the water consumed . Motion carried . The load curtailment contracts have haer, sent out for 1993 . The signed agreements will determine participation . The final plat for Milwaukee Manor has been approved by City Council . There were six fire calls for a total of 3 hours and 55 minutes . There were no lost time accidents for January , 1993 . A special meeting is scheduled for February 8 . 1993 at 4 : 00 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room for the purpose of waae discussion . The next regular meeting will be held in the Shakopee Public Utilities meeting room on March 1 , 1993 at 4 : 30 P.M. Motion by O'Toole . seconded by cook that the meeting_ be adiourned . Motion carried . \ . Barbara Menden , -o . ission Secretary MTNUTES OF THF SH RCPFF PTIRtTC TTTILTTTF:, COMMTSST ON (Special Session ) The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in special session on February 8: 1993 at 4 : O" P .M. in the Utilities meeting room. 1 MVMBFRS PRESENT: Commissioners Kirchmeier and O'Toole. Also Manager Van Hout . .7im Cook had advised that he would arrive a few minutes after the startina time . y^.} inn by O'Toole . seconded Kirchmeier to adjourn to executive session . Motion carried . Jim, Cook arrived and took his seat . Motion by O'Toole , seconded by Kirchmeier to adjourn from _ executive session . Motion carried . M^+ ion by O'Toole , Seconded by Kirchmeier that the meeting be adiourned . Motion carried . ATTEST: .1) i iX?.=4 A Loin VarHout . Manager I l A/ ` Barbara Menden . C.:. ,,ti sion Secretary 3 SCOTT COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM 428 S. HOLMES ST. SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 (612) 496-8.30 February 25, 1993 City of Shakopee Shakopee City Hall 129 E. First Ave. Shakopee, MN 55372 ATTEN: Dennis Kraft , Mayor Laurent City Council Members RE: Scott County Library System 1992 Annual Report Enclosed are copies of th'e Scott County Library System 1992 Annual Report. This is an overview of our 1992 library activities in the county. We also included a 1993 calendar bookmark. As you can see, library use in Scott County was impressive during the past year and our per capita use is above the national average. More important than the items checked out , are the number of people who come through the doors of the library throughout the year. The residents are coming to the library for a number of reasons and most often the public library is the first contact that a person makes when they visit a city. We are truly the information resource of each local community. We thank you for your continued support of life-long learning in your community. Please call me at 496-8331 if you have any questions, comments or suggestions. S {tcerel y, -net Williams, Director .cott County Library System JW:dlm Enclosures CertainTeed Corporation 3303 E. 4th Ave. CertainTeedPO Box 506 El Shakopee. MN 55379 February 24, 1993 pgr-kx-tip Mr. James M. McCann MAR 0 11993 Enforcement Unit Compliance and Enforcement Section CITY OF ShAnOPEE Air Quality Division Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette St. Paul, MN 55155 re: Shakopee Facility, Odor Dear Mr. McCann: This letter is submitted as a monthly progress report required by your letter of September 5, 1991. It outlines activities concerning the odor issue at our facility in Shakopee since the last report dated January 5, 1993. During the month of February, Huntington Energy Systems continued construction of the thermal oxidizer equipment. CertainTeed engineers visited the fabrication shop in Reading, PA. during February to see the progress and plan for the installation. Huntington people and their subcontractors visited the Shakopee plant site on February 23rd and 24th to finalize installation plans. The control room construction is completed and we are now installing the electrical equipment. The thermal oxidizer equipment installation will begin in March. Current activity per the schedule is as follows: Activity Target Date Status Purchasing and March 5, 1993 Deliveries start week of delivery of March 8th Control room March 12, 1993 Complete in March See attached Gantt chart for delivery and installation schedule. Mr. James M. McCann page 2 February 25, 1993 Mr.Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator with the City of Shakopee has requested to be copied on these monthly progress reports in order to keep the citizens of Shakopee better informed. Our next progress report will be submitted in early March, 1993. Sincerely, 74,v-c.r.)_---- Gary (Di. Swenson, CPE Principal Plant Engineer GAS:mr cc: C. Carfrey J. Quaranta K. Everhart L. Hawk R. Krause M. Noone N. Robinson R. Wagner B. Stock, City of Shakopee (attachment) M al crl1 Q) O+ O I Q N 5 C 3 O 2 %- .Q L O 2 41al e O _, V Cl 0 O b Z V 0 OJ (/) • Q 1 F ,C e .ri 1 C -J03 3 3 N -) Y 0 N O _ J L 1 v V Q 0 L cr 0 L O - O ,,a a i v N W 0 i< 01 O 2 n 'n V v a 0 Z V 0 v rn - }} 0 -J 0 F.. Z z = W 1 J O O CI Z W QQ x m cc a 2 cc 01- LLi I0 z0 as w Z 0 W > NWc UW 01 WL'1Q1 Ld�W� 2 Lai(NI ZWN AWN AWN �W� 3N aWC1 W ai01 W 0101 a 0101 D 010 O en 61 W en 01_, a 01� Z 01 ,,C4 U 0101 U 01 0) a 01 Y F- --Ne vY .- LL Y .- OYr Y01 Cl_ Y Q1 DY `" CC -Y 4•- Z Y .- CI *- M ? 3 �3 a3 I }3 W3 ` E3 < a3 j a3 1 w3 1., 03 > LA-03 1--1 O w r-%N O li 00 N O in j tf)j Z0 -5 O O 1-00o Z O O -C 0 O < O > 0N �p0 aNM �.O =M.� (X 05 aM0 aN � ZOO 5.- OZ Q1 U F- ►7 Z ." O .- C/) C/) M < a N 0 N r.2 - W M 0 C O 0 M rn rn v rn I Q - N 3 •O L L Cl M u- • rn c 01 0 U U O O Z • 0 O - v en • J 7 O i - v N — c'1 O 0 en L I U Q N CP•M O i - 0 0z a w � N Y C Q al 0 _ r 7 J) V N O 0 O Z • 0 O N Ql • OI 7 Q Z O Z E. O w O Z co Z � < L,JM OUP') WM ZL,IM ►=3I (A ` 03 ` g3 I �3 0 I Ztoo Ulm �OM< O - p5 s 0 a � �cn 8 N N z N U L. 0_ O z VI C 0 City of Shakopee ;�i- o ''� POLICE DEPARTMENT ,0z KO,o 4, r o .t ;�`� 1 o <(`� 476 South Gorman Street A '• ►i. It SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 vO L le Tel. 612/445-6666 f • v � ;b Fax. 612/445-2313 y0AKOPFz 477,140.cP� °� i NNESo • 07,' `;ii , ,�a i' ' The Police Report An inside look at police activity. March 12,1893 "Police Academy 93" In Progress Crime Prevention News "Police Academy 93" is an opportunity National Night Out - is a nation wide for the police department and the program designed to heighten` crime community to share ideas and express and drug prevention awareness in the goals. The Academy is a way for the community and to strengthen police department to find out what the neighborhood spirit and police needs or desires of the community are, community relations. Officer Ron and also a way for citizens get a close- Scherer recently met with members of up look at their police department. the K.C. Hall to start planning neighborhood activities for this event, The first session was held March 4th, which will be held in August. This will and included a tour of the Police be Shakopee's second "Night Out". . Department, information about illegal drugs, and an overview of the records Bicycle Registration - Shakopee unit, patrol division and investigation Police and St. Francis Regional unit. We also explained our Crime Medical Center are joining together to Prevention program and ended with a promote bicycle safety and bicycle question and answer session. registration. On March 8th Officer's Scherer and Forberg met with St. The second session was held March Francis Regional Medical Center 11th and explained traffic investigation, representatives to organize this event. traffic law enforcement, DWI's, training, Watch for more information in the near and also ended with a question and future. answer session. The final session is scheduled for March 18th and will cover D.A.R.E., youth services and budgeting. go cseavE a zotect Juvenile Alcohol and Drug Violations Police are required by state statute to Five Juveniles Arrested in report alcohol and drug violations to Thefts from Locker Room the juvenile's school district "Chemical Abuse Pre-Assessment Team". To help facilitate this requirement we have On February 11th, the Hutchinson implemented a new form, which basketball team reported the thefts of officers carry with them and complete several items from the locker room at at the scene of contact with a juvenile the Shakopee Jr. High School. On violator. The form is then mailed to the February 16th, Officer Ron Carlson school district in which the student is arrested five juveniles for the thefts and attending classes. (A copy is attached.) was able to recover most of the property. County Attorney's to Two Arrested In Ride With Officers Snowmobile Thefts Chief Steininger and Tom Harbinson, On February 27th, an adult male and a of the Scott County Attorney's Office, juvenile male were arrested for the have held several meetings to discuss thefts of three snowmobiles and a how to achieve better results in court. snowmobile trailer. Two snowmobiles As a result, the suggestion for county and a trailer were stolen from the attorney's to ride with officers on patrol Glenn Ellyn neighborhood on February has been approved. The goal of this 26th. The third snowmobile was stolen activity is to improve communication from Vierling Drive on February 27th. and understanding between Both males were charged with felony prosecutors and officers on the street, theft. which is the first step towards working together towards more effective prosecution. Cars Damaged in High Statistics School Parking Lot January and February Statistics are Three vehicles parked in the Sr. High included. School parking lot on the night of March 6th were heavily vandalized. Windows were smashed out, beer poured on the cars and tooth paste smeared on them. Watch for future information. Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 8:57 am Crime Summary Report - UOC Page: 1 Monthly Report For January 1993 SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Print Only First ISN Print ALL LGN Codes U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation 9301 . . . 1 LOST, PERSON 9303 . . . 1 LOST, PROPERTY 9311 . . . 2 FOUND, PERSON 9313 . . . 6 FOUND, PROPERTY 9314 . . . 7 FOUND, ABANDONED OR STOLEN VEHICLE 9400 . . . 53 MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT ( 10-50, ALL OTHERS) 9420 . . . 5 MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT (10-52, PERSONAL INJ) 9450 . . . 7 MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT (H&R NO INJURY) 9452 . . . 1 9461 . . . 1 PEDESTRIAN-MOTOR VEH. , PERSONAL INJURY 9520 . . . 5 ACCIDENTS, PUBLIC-OTHER, ALL OTHERS 9522 . . . 6 ACCIDENTS, PUBLIC-OTHER, FALLS 9530 . . . 15 ACCIDENTS, HOME, ALL OTHERS 9531 . . . 2 ACCIDENTS, HOME, FALLS Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 8:57 am Crime Summary Report - UOC Page: 2 Monthly Report For January 1993 SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Print Only First ISN Print ALL LGN Codes U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation 9535 . . . 3 ACCIDENTS, MEDICAL, HEART ATTACKS, HOME 9540 . . . 2 ACCIDENTS, OCCUPATIONAL, ALL OTHER 9542 . . . 1 ACCIDENTS, OCCUPATIONAL, FALLS 9561 . . . 1 ANIMAL BITES, DOG 9600 . . . 1 FIRES, ALL OTHERS 9601 . . . 2 FIRES, SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 9603 . . . 1 FIRES, COMMERCIAL 9606 . . . 1 FIRES, VEHICLE 9710 . . . 1 MEDICAL, SUICIDE ATTEMPT 9715 . . . 2 MEDICAL, SUICIDE THREAT 9722 . . . 1 MEDICAL, BODY FOUND, ADULT FEMALE 9740 . . . 1 MENTAL PERSONS 9800 . . . 79 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC 9801 . . . 6 DOMESTICS Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 8:57 am Crime Summary Report - UOC Page: 3 Monthly Report For January 1993 SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Print Only First ISN Print ALL LGN Codes U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation 9802 . . . 23 PUBLIC ASSIST/MOTORIST ASSIST 9803 . . . 5 DETOXIFICATION 9805 . . . 41 SUSPICION (PROWLER, OPEN DOOR, VEH. , PERSON) 9806 . . . 6 ATTEMPT TO LOCATE/CHECK WELFARE OF PERSON 9807 . . . 1 WEAPONS COMPLAINT (HUNTERS,SHOOTERS,FIRECRAC) 9808 . . . 7 SNOWMOBILE COMPLAINTS 9809 . . . 38 VEHICLE COMPLAINTS (MUFFLERS, PARKING) 9812 . . . 4 STALLED VEHICLE, REQ TO PARK, NOTIFY OFFICER 9813 . . . 3 FIGHT (BARROOM, GANGS, ETC. ) 9815 . . . 9 JUVENILES (COMPLAINTS ABOUT) 9816 . . . 1 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 9817 . . . 8 DISPUTES (CUSTOMER,PATIENT,PERSON, OTHER) 9818 . . . 29 DISTURBANCE (LOUD MUSIC, LOUD PARTY) 9824 . . . 9 CIVIL DISPUTES, COMPLAINTS Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 8:57 am Crime Summary Report - UOC Page: 4 Monthly Report For January 1993 SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Print Only First ISN Print ALL LGN Codes U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation 9825 . . . 7 GUN PERMITS, REQUEST TO ACQUIRE 9826 . . . 1 GUN PERMITS, REQUEST TO CARRY 9827 . . . 8 PRANK 9-1-1 CALT,S 9828 . . . 10 ANIMAL COMPLAINTS (BARKING, RUNNING LOOSE) 9900 . . . 4 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICER 9901 . . . 49 ALARM 9902 . . . 5 ESCORTS, FUNERAL 9905 . . . 3 WARRANTS/SUBPEONA/SUMMONS (SERVICE OF) 9909 . . . 1 BAR CHECKS, BUSINESS CHECKS, WALK THROUGH 9911 . . . 1 MESSAGE DELIVERY (EMERGENCY-OTHER) 9913 . . . 24 ASSIST OTHER POLICE AGENCY 9914 . . . 2 ORDINANCE VIOLATION (DISPLAY AFTER-HOURS,ETC) 9915 . . . 2 ESCORTS, ALL OTHERS 9923 . . . 1 LITTERING Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 8:57 am Crime Summary Report - UOC Page: 5 Monthly Report For January 1993 SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Print Only First ISN Print ALL LGN Codes U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation A5351 . . . 4 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-F A5352 . . . 3 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-A A5357 . . . 1 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-POLICE A9500 . . . 1 TERROR-THRT INFLT BH-UNK WEAP A9502 . . . 1 TERROR-THRT INFLT BH-UNK-WEAP-ADLT-ACQ B2330 . . . 1 BURG 2-UNOCC RES FRC-D-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT B2365 . . . 1 BURG 2-UNOCC RES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM PROPE B2390 . . . 1 BURG 2-UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT B2494 . . . 1 BURG 2-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM TH B2930 . . . 1 BURG 2-ATFRC RES-D-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT B3764 . . . 3 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEF B3894 . . . 4 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM T CO211 . . . 1 FORGERY-UNK LVL-UTT POSS-CHECK-PERSON CO212 . . . 1 FORGERY-UNK LVL-UTT POSS-CHECK-BUSINESS Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 8:57 am Crime Summary Report - UOC Page: 6 Monthly Report For January 1993 SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Print Only First ISN Print ALL LGN Codes U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation CO2E2 . . . 1 DC508 . . . 1 I0060 . . . 3 CRIM AGNST FAM-UNK LVL-NEGLECT OF A CHILD I0070 . . . 4 CRIM AGNST FAM-UNK LVL-MALIC PUNISHMENT C I0109 . . . 1 J3500 . . . 7 TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQ L1071 . . . 1 CSC 1-UNK ACT-AQUAINT-UNDER 13-F L7074 . . . 1 L7A77 . . . 1 M3001 . . . 3 JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER M4106 . . . 1 LIQUOR-PROCURING LIQUOR FOR A MINOR M4199 . . . 3 LIQUOR-OTHER M5350 . . . 1 RUNAWAY N3030 . . . 2 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 8: 57 am Crime Summary Report - UOC Page: 7 Monthly Report For January 1993 SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Print Only First ISN Print ALL LGN Codes U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation N3190 . . . 12 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASING COMMUNICATION N3210 . . . 1 DISTURB PEACE-MS-FALSE FIRE ALARM P3110 . . . 18 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT P3130 . . . 1 PROP DAMAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT T0060 . . . 1 THEFT-UNK LVL VAL-FRM MAIL-UNK PROP TCO29 . . . 1 THEFT-FELONY-501 TO 2500-BUILD-OTH PROP TC999 . . . 1 THEFT-FELONY-501 TO 2500-SELF-SERV GAS-OTHER TF029 . . . 1 THEFT-GM-201-500-BUILDING-OTHER PROPERTY TF159 . . . 1 THEFT-GM-201-500-MOTOR VEHICLE-OTHER PROP TG019 . . . 1 THEFT-MISD-LESS 200-PERSON-OTHER PROPERTY TG021 . . . 1 THEFT-MISD-LESS 200-BUILDING-MONEY-OTHER NEG TG029 . . . 3 THEFT-MISD-LESS 200-BUILDING-OTHER PROPERTY TG099 . . . 2 THEFT-MISD-LESS 200-SELF-SERVICE GAS-OTHER PR TG229 . . . 1 THEFT-MISD-LESS 200-STREET-DRIVE-LOT-OTHER PR Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 8 :57 am Crime Summary Report - UOC Page: 8 Monthly Report For January 1993 SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Print Only First ISN Print ALL LGN Codes U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation TG990 . . . 1 TG999 . . . 1 U0992 . . . 1 U0993 . . . 1 FRAUD-UNK LVL-OTHER ACT-501-2500 U2553 . . . 1 U3068 . . . 1 MISD THEFT BY SWINDLE OR TRICK $200 OR LESS U3288 . . . 1 MISDEMEANOR SHOPLIFTING $200 OR LESS VA021 . . . 2 VEHICLE THEFT RELATED-FEL-AUTO VA022 . . . 3 VEHICLE THEFT RELATED-FEL-TRUCK-BUS VA024 . . . 2 VEHICLE THEFT RELATED-FEL-THEFT-SNOWMOBILE VB021 . . . 1 VCO22 . . . 1 VE110 . . . 5 VEHICLE THEFT RELATED-MISD-PARTS FR MV-OTHER X3080 . . . 1 CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 8:57 am Crime Summary Report - UOC Page: 9 Monthly Report For January 1993 SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Print Only First ISN Print ALL LGN Codes U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation X3250 . . . 1 *** AGENCY GRAND TOTAL: 638 Fri 0'-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 1: 30 pm Citation Summary Report - UOC Page: 1 Monthly Report for January 1993 File Type : Citation Print ALL LGN Codes SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Including Juv. Water/Traffic Records U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation 9000 . . . 1 CARELESS/RECKLESS DRIVING 9001 . 45 SPEED 9009 . . . 1 ILLEGAL U-TURN 9017 . 1 HEADS LAMPS OFF WHILE OPERATING VEHICLE 9021 . . 1 LOUD MUFFLERS 9030 . . 4 STOP SIGN VIOLATION (FAIL TO STOP FOR) 9032 . . 4 SEMAPHORE VIOLATION (RED STOP LIGHT) 9080 . . 1 MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS 9100 . . . 4 PARK IN "NO PARKING" ZONE 9104 . . . 1 PARK BY FIRE HYDRANT, RR CROSSING, SIGNS 9106 . . 2 PARK IN HANDICAPPED ZONE 9107 . . 2 WRONG WAY PARKING 9108 . . . 1 ABANDONED VEHICLE (ORD) 9110 . 17 PARK IN SNOW REMOVAL AREA (SNOWBIRD) 9111 . . . 1 PARK IN FIRE LANE (ORD) 9118 . . 4 MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS (RES. PKING ONLY) 9200 . . . 2 DRIVE AFTER CANCELLATION 9201 . . . 1 DRIVE AFTER REVOCATION 9202 . . . 2 DRIVE AFTER SUSPENSION 9203 . . . 2 NO MINN. DRIVERS' LICENSE 9204 . . . 1 EXPIRED DRIVERS' LICENSE 9205 . . . 1 MORE THAN ONE D/L IN POSSESSION 9206 . . . 1 NO DRIVERS' LICENSE IN POSSESSION Fr=i 'C1-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 1:30 pm Citation Summary Report - UOC Page: 2 Monthly Report for January 1993 File Type : Citation Print ALL LGN Codes SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Including Juv. Water/Traffic Records U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation 9215 . . . 33 NO CURRENT REGISTRATION/EXPIRED PLATES 9236 . . 4 OPERATE VEHICLE WITHOUT INSURANCE J3500 . . . 6 TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** GRAND TOTAL . 143 Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 11:52 am Crime Summary Report - UOC Page: 1 Monthly Report For February 1993 SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Print Only First ISN Print ALL LGN Codes U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation 9301 . . . 2 LOST, PERSON 9311 . . . 1 FOUND, PERSON 9312 . . . 1 FOUND, ANIMAL 9313 . . . 4 FOUND, PROPERTY 9314 . . . 3 FOUND, ABANDONED OR STOLEN VEHICLE 9315 . . . 4 FOUND, RECOVERED STOLEN PROPERTY 9400 . . . 21 MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT ( 10-50, ALL OTHERS) 9420 . . . 3 MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT (10-52, PERSONAL INJ) 9450 . . . 3 MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT (H&R NO INJURY) 9470 . . . 2 9520 . . . 7 ACCIDENTS, PUBLIC-OTHER, ALL OTHERS 9522 . . . 3 ACCIDENTS, PUBLIC-OTHER, FALLS 9524 . . . 2 ACCIDENTS, PUBLIC-HEART ATTACKS 9530 . . . 11 ACCIDENTS, HOME, ALL OTHERS Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 11:52 am Crime Summary Report - UOC Page: 2 Monthly Report For February 1993 SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Print Only First ISN Print ALL LGN Codes U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation 9531 . . . 4 ACCIDENTS, HOME, FALLS 9540 . . . 3 ACCIDENTS, OCCUPATIONAL, ALL OTHER 9561 . . . 1 ANIMAL BITES, DOG 9601 . . . 1 FIRES, SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 9604 . . . 1 FIRES, INDUSTRIAL 9606 . . . 1 FIRES, VEHICLE 9712 . . . 1 SUICIDE ATTEMPT, ADULT FEMALE 9722 . . . 1 MEDICAL, BODY FOUND, ADULT FEMALE 9800 . . . 47 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC 9801 . . . 12 DOMESTICS 9802 . . . 26 PUBLIC ASSIST/MOTORIST ASSIST 9803 . . . 2 DETOXIFICATION 9805 . . . 40 SUSPICION (PROWLER, OPEN DOOR, VEH. , PERSON) 9806 . . . 11 ATTEMPT TO LOCATE/CHECK WELFARE OF PERSON Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 11:52 am Crime Summary Report - UOC Page: 3 Monthly Report For February 1993 SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Print Only First ISN Print ALL LGN Codes U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation 9807 . . . 1 WEAPONS COMPLAINT (HUNTERS,SHOOTERS,FIRECRAC) 9808 . . . 2 SNOWMOBILE COMPLAINTS 9809 . . . 40 VEHICLE COMPLAINTS (MUFFLERS, PARKING) 9812 . . . 1 STALLED VEHICLE, REQ TO PARK, NOTIFY OFFICER 9813 . . . 5 FIGHT (BARROOM, GANGS, ETC. ) 9815 . . . 15 JUVENILES (COMPLAINTS ABOUT) 9817 . . . 6 DISPUTES (CUSTOMER,PATIENT,PERSON, OTHER) 9818 . . . 18 DISTURBANCE (LOUD MUSIC, LOUD PARTY) 9820 . . . 2 REPOSSESSION OF VEHICLE (NOTIFICATION) 9823 . . . 1 TRESPASSERS (BEER PARTY/KEGGERS) 9824 . . . 15 CIVIL DISPUTES, COMPLAINTS 9825 . . . 3 GUN PERMITS, REQUEST TO ACQUIRE 9827 . . . 5 PRANK 9-1-1 CALLS 9828 . . . 12 ANIMAL COMPLAINTS (BARKING, RUNNING LOOSE) Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 11:52 am Crime Summary Report - UOC Page: 4 Monthly Report For February 1993 SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Print Only First ISN Print ALL LGN Codes U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation 9829 . . . 1 TAXICABS LICENSE, APPLICATION FOR 9901 . . . 36 ALARM 9902 . . . 6 ESCORTS, FUNERAL 9905 . . . 5 WARRANTS/SUBPEONA/SUMMONS (SERVICE OF) 9908 . . . 1 HOUSE CHECKS 9909 . . . 1 BAR CHECKS, BUSINESS CHECKS, WALK THROUGH 9910 . . . 1 EXTRA PATROL REQUESTS 9913 . . . 19 ASSIST OTHER POLICE AGENCY 9915 . . . 1 ESCORTS, ALL OTHERS 9922 . . . 1 LOITERING 9923 . . . 2 LITTERING A2D23 . . . 1 A3253 . . . 1 ASLT 3-SUBSTANTIAL INJURY-HANDS ETC-ADLT- A5351 . . . 7 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-F Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 11:52 am Crime Summary Report - UOC Page: 5 Monthly Report For February 1993 SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Print Only First ISN Print ALL LGN Codes U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation A5352 . . . 1 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-A A5353 . . . 3 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-S A5355 . . . 1 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHILD-A A5357 . . . 1 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-POLICE A9500 . . . 1 TERROR-THRT INFLT BH-UNK WEAP A9663 . . . 1 B2334 . . . 2 BURG 2-UNOCC RES FRC-D-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT B3760 . . . 1 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT B3894 . . . 2 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM T CO212 . . . 1 FORGERY-UNK LVL-UTT POSS-CHECK-BUSINESS D0505 . . . 1 I0060 . . . 2 CRIM AGNST FAM-UNK LVL-NEGLECT OF A CHILD I0070 . . . 3 CRIM AGNST FAM-UNK LVL-MALIC PUNISHMENT C J2500 . . . 2 TRAFFIC-GM-DRIVE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF LIQUO Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 11:52 am Crime Summary Report - UOC Page: 6 Monthly Report For February 1993 SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Print Only First ISN Print ALL LGN Codes U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation J2700 . . . 2 TRAF-ACCID-GM-AGGREVATED VIOLATION J3500 . . . 4 TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQ L3033 . . . 1 LA002 . . . 1 M3001 . . . 1 JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER M4199 . . . 1 LIQUOR-OTHER M5313 . . . 1 JUVENILE-CURFEW M5350 . . . 4 RUNAWAY M7399 . . . 1 OTHER-CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER M8199 . . . 1 CRUELTY TO ANIMALS-OTHER N3030 . . . 5 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT N3190 . . . 12 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASING COMMUNICATION P2110 . . . 2 PROP DAMAGE-GM-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT P3110 . . . 12 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 11:52 am Crime Summary Report - UOC Page: 7 Monthly Report For February 1993 SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Print Only First ISN Print ALL LGN Codes U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation P3120 . . . 1 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PUBLIC-UNK INTENT TC159 . . . 2 THEFT-FELONY-501-2500-MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP TF021 . . . 1 THEFT-GM-201-500-BUILDING-MONEY-OTHER NEGOT TF059 . . . 1 THEFT-GM-201-500-YARDS-OTHER PROPERTY TF111 . . . 2 TF159 . . . 4 THEFT-GM-201-500-MOTOR VEHICLE-OTHER PROP TG009 . . . 1 THEFT-MISD-LESS 200-OTHER PROPERTY TG021 . . . 1 THEFT-MISD-LESS 200-BUILDING-MONEY-OTHER NEG TG029 . . . 2 THEFT-MISD-LESS 200-BUILDING-OTHER PROPERTY TG099 . . . 3 THEFT-MISD-LESS 200-SELF-SERVICE GAS-OTHER PR TG159 . . . 2 THEFT-MISD-LESS 200-MOTR VEHICLE-OTHER PROP U3287 . . . 1 THEFT-SHOPLIFTING U3288 . . . 2 MISDEMEANOR SHOPLIFTING $200 OR LESS U3289 . . . 1 POSSESSION OF SHOPLIFTING GEAR-MS Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 11:52 am Crime Summary Report - UOC Page: 8 Monthly Report For February 1993 SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Print Only First ISN Print ALL LGN Codes U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation U3998 . . . 1 MISD FRAUD VA022 . . . 1 VEHICLE THEFT RELATED-FEL-TRUCK-BUS VA024 . . . 1 VEHICLE THEFT RELATED-FEL-THEFT-SNOWMOBILE VB021 . . . 1 VB024 . . . 1 VB111 . . . 1 VD110 . . . 2 VEHICLE THEFT RELATED-GM-PARTS FROM VEH-OTHER VE110 . . . 2 VEHICLE THEFT RELATED-MISD-PARTS FR MV-OTHER X3080 . . . 1 CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS *** AGENCY GRAND TOTAL: 532 Fri 03-12-93 Shakopee Police Department Time: 1:36 pm Citation Summary Report - UOC Page: 1 Monthly Report for February 1993 File Type : Citation Print ALL LGN Codes SBN : All Print ALL U 0 C codes Including Juv. Water/Traffic Records U 0 C Total U 0 C Literal Translation 9000 . . . 1 CARELESS/RECKLESS DRIVING 9001 . . 37 SPEED 9007 . . . 1 IMPROPER CHANGE OF COURSE 9029 . . . 1 ORD. EXHIBITION DRIVING/UNREASONABLE ACCELER. 9030 . . 3 STOP SIGN VIOLATION (FAIL TO STOP FOR) 9032 . . . 5 SEMAPHORE VIOLATION (RED STOP LIGHT) 9100 . . . 7 PARK IN "NO PARKING" ZONE 9109 . . . 10 OVERTIME PARKING (ORD) 9201 . . . 1 DRIVE AFTER REVOCATION 9202 . . . 3 DRIVE AFTER SUSPENSION 9215 . . . 10 NO CURRENT REGISTRATION/EXPIRED PLATES J3500 . . . 4 TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** GRAND TOTAL . . . 83 *Z OFFICIAL PROCEEDING OF THE SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 17, 1993 The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. with the following members present: Albinson, Miller, VanHorn, Unseth, Dirks, Phillips and Brandmire. Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator was also present. Miller/Unseth moved to approve the minutes of the December 16, 1992 meeting as kept. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock gave a brief economic development update. He noted that the prison is doing a major expansion with ground breaking expected for this spring. Mr. Stock also reported that the Valley Ice Arena Analysis should be completed within the next five (5) days. A Committee of the Whole meeting will be scheduled for March 1, 1993 to discuss this issue in greater detail. Mr. Stock also noted that negotiations are currently under way for the property south of the Senior High School. The City is currently looking at acquiring approximately 57 acres with 30 acres to be sold to the School District. Mr. Stock also noted that the appraisal for the former Pelham Hotel site has been completed and negotiations are under way for acquisition. Discussion ensued on the possibility of developing a city newsletter. Mr. Stock stated that there are several options available to the City in terms of completing a newsletter. He shared with the Committee several alternative ways of approaching a newsletter that are being utilized by surrounding communities. He went on to state that the primary costs involved in completing the newsletter are staffing, mailing and printing. Design is also a factor that must be taken into consideration. Mr. Stock stated that the City of Savage contracts with a private individual who provides production services and typesetting. The Savage newsletter includes advertisements. The individual under contract is responsible for selling the ads and keeps all ad proceeds. The City contributes approximately $10, 000.00 per year to the contractor. Chaska contracts with a graphic arts firm who provides layout and typesetting services. The City prepares the majority of the stories for inclusion in the newsletter with editorial review by the contractor. The design cost is approximately $75. 00 per page. This of course does not include printing and mailing. Mr. Stock stated that the City of Prior Lake produces their newsletter in house. All stories are provided by staff. Layout, typesetting and printing are provided by a local printer. Prior Lake annually budgets approximately $10, 000. 00 for their quarterly newsletter. Mr. Stock stated that the Recreational Department presently co- sponsors a brochure with the Shakopee Community Education. The brochure is distributed to every household in Shakopee on three Official Proceedings of the February 17, 1993 Shakopee Community Development Commission Page -2- different occasions annually. The brochure is printed on newsprint. Mailing costs and production costs are split equally between the two jurisdictions. The current cost to the City to participate in the brochure is approximately $33 .48 per page. Given the budget limitations and time constraints, Mr. Stock stated that he felt it would be best to pursue expansion of the Community Education/Recreation brochure. He stated that a section of this brochure could be dedicated to City issues. We could incorporate topics from the monthly updates from City Hall to be included in the brochure. Costs would be minimal for this type of service. Mr. Miller stated that he felt the City should embark on a free standing newsletter that could be directly distributed to each household independent of other information. Mr. Miller questioned how the Chamber of Commerce produced their newsletter. Ms. Dirks stated that the Chamber newsletter is produced by Chamber of Commerce staff with printing completed by a local printer. Mr. Stock noted that one of the primary cost factors involved in distributing a newsletter are the mailing costs. He stated that with bulk rate mail it would still cost approximately $1,500.00 to reach every household in the community per issue. Mr. Stock went on to state that the 1993 budget did not include funds for a City newsletter. Mr. Albinson stated that he thought staffs proposed approach wold at least get the ball moving in terms of a City newsletter. He thought that it would be appropriate to recommend to City Council that funding be included in the 1994 budget for a free standing City newsletter. He hoped that at least one issue of the recreation brochure could be completed prior to budget time to show City Council what could be accomplished. Mr. Miller stated that he feared that if we participated in the Recreation brochure that the information would get lost and that over time staff would not pursue a free standing newsletter. Brandmire/Unseth moved to request staff to produce a City newsletter in conjunction with the Community Education/Recreation brochure and that funding be included in the 1994 budget for a free standing City newsletter. Motion carried with Commissioner Miller opposed. Discussion ensued on the Star City One Year Economic Development Plan. Mr. Miller stated that the City newsletter option discussed should be included in goal number 3 . Miller/Phillips moved to approve the 1993 One Year Economic Development Plan as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion ensued on the Three Year Economic Development Plan. Commissioner Dirks questioned whether or not the plan to contact at least one existing Shakopee business per month should be carried Official Proceedings of the February 17, 1993 Shakopee Community Development Commission Page -3- forward in 1994 and 1995. Mr. Stock responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Albinson stated that the titles on the pages noted that the plan was the five year work plan and not the three year work plan. Mr. Stock stated that this should be changed. Miller/Vanhorn moved to approve the Three Year Economic Development Plan as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion ensued on the Downtown Rehab Grant Program. Mr. Stock stated that for the past several years the Community Development Commission has requested the Shakopee HRA to continue the Downtown Rehab Grant Program. Mr. Stock stated that there are several persons interested in participating in the Rehab Grant Program this year. He requested the CDC to recommend to the HRA that the program be continued in 1993 . Mr. Stock stated that the 1993 HRA budget did allocate $25, 000.00 for this program. It was the consensus of the Committee that the Downtown Rehab Grant Program should be continued. Discussion ensued regarding the relatively slow activity surrounding the program. Mr. Albinson stated that many of the downtown property owners are continuing to wait and see what impact the mini by-pass will have on their property prior to investing dollars in their buildings. VanHorn/Miller moved to recommend to the Shakopee HRA that the Downtown Rehab Grant Program be continued in 1993 . Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Albinson gave a brief report from the Transportation Coalition. He stated that funding for the Bloomington Ferry Bridge has been included in the Governors Budget but that the bridge completion date will probably be pushed back to 1996. He stated that the southerly bypass completion date has also been pushed back to 1996. Mr. Stock gave a brief Scott County Economic Development Coalition report. He noted that the Economic Development Coalition is planning on a Economic Development Day at Mystic Lake on Friday, May 21, 1993 . Developer's, Broker's and business prospects interested in Scott County will be invited to this event. Mr. Stock gave a brief report on the mini by-pass projects enhancements that were included in the downtown redevelopment study which was completed by the CDC several months ago. Mr. Stock stated that several meetings have been held between MnDOT officials and staff and they are working on incorporating several of the enhancements into the mini by-pass project. He stated that he would report back at the next meeting with further information. Discussion ensued on the status of the old City Hall facility. Mr. Stock stated that the City is interested in leasing the space. Ms. Dirks questioned the impact of ADA on leasing the facility. Ms. Dirks stated that if the lessor employs 20 employees or less and there are no building improvements on the site the City would not incur any liability in bringing the building up to ADA standards. Official Proceedings of the February 17, 1993 Shakopee Community Development Commission Page -4- It was the consensus of the Committee that this issue should be looked into in greater detail and that the possibility of a small business incubator program be investigated for the former City Hall facility. It was the consensus of the Committee that staff investigate the possibility of the City's acquisition of the shoe shop building across the street from City Hall. The building is presently boarded up and presents an eye sore to the downtown area. Mr. Stock stated that he would place this item on the next agenda for further discussion. Mr. Stock noted that in March it would also be appropriate to include the election of officers as an agenda item. VanHorn/Miller moved to adjourn the meeting at 7: 10 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. W W W W W w W W W W W W W W W N W W W W W W W N W W W W w w W W W w W W W W N W W W m„O /1> A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A C W W W W w W W C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C r r r C II O WWWWIJNNNrr00000 CO 0)0AAAAA CO MIJIAAAAAANNNNrr co AOOZnt. mow OVIArO40(00o40)A -4 rrao0)WNr -4 00(nAWNrO(OW4OUIN -4 OAOp n m 0 0 110 mm3N<v mr0m>Nv> -4 DNN-3Sr -40 ONNf mXmc0X0mr-4C) -4 rm-vo n -1 zzl-+ZDO1-4ODOmUDro > 0-I-400>C) > O-4mrnrmrCI-4,-Im►-Iz> > 0,-.1M011 00NQrcmrZ3rUrD3 r ODDrO0D r 0331 -ItnC)m0>w r ocno'-ui `'� -I 1-I, O rZ 14-40 VmmmZ44 m-4-41-1m-4-41-11-4>-i ,r,D mmr023r01.=c0r 00m nO Zz m0 0 MDV) z ri mmmOr r- rrn7' -I>000 M 07m -1 r+Dm u m rnrn-oM-< Urnprn00O01-I z 0 mm I-1 ti-4 vmz/-to+CmrM D xi-MC)n to ' • mmcm mm rrXm3-fXU) -4 >>> A C) 9.m)41-4ZZC-I i-1 mm X G) -4m n C) amC3�11- =0<rn m rn-I m -0-Ir4-IX m m0 m00000-IC)rMM m 0-<Z u m r-,r+rODZ<mr+Z0ZO0v M mOOMO Z z-173DD 1-Immo--,DD to --0-I mut-4 Z24-1<I-+m1-1x$V Nm-I07cD G) D3 N NPDh+rr-u-uz zC)ZZ D0-1=11-10 000DM00<1-1 r( 0 -1 0 I I Hrn m PZ-1--I rrnmr(rn00 ><VDD n-1 I-- rn1--10<00C I-I < Z l/) 01-4m0vvmMU1-imZSX DXr n 1-I 0'11C 9.0ozrnmm3 < m -31-I Z7:) mm330O NI-Il-I 77 n O mmO m <Dm m >J ODZ R. 0 azrll-a m mcncn r-1 flu z Dm>, -11 ND VPZZ Z rr10 V 33-4-402 mm -4 Cu 0 7: m 01-1-0-1 A 3 I-4Z V Orn H1-+00PU) ►+ Zn M N m 3DOZO S m C)-I= 1n M -4-4 mm m Ou N 1-4 Z V m > Z m rn W MX 00 3 U) II -n Z MO O -4 rI 3 X4-4 I-I II 11 0 D 3 rr 1-4-1 -I II M r-4 M U)m m r CO -I -10 N u -41/1D C4 C N N II M0 >, m n D m rn m u --I m < n 4-4 m m 3 n O 3 Z rn u Z m C Z to z m -11I -4 to I n n 1 II u U I n u n m N n 77 U) N N n m-i N fA - - n <1-4 W O) Ar N r V WW u m3 0 r Nr AV V VI- rA A r r0 0) W VI VrUI u ZD NONNrrONoo NA00 W 000)000) -4,1 00 NW Ac0)0 AN 01 r 000-4 n C-I - - - n m m 00000NOO)O NOOA (O 00N000NN N WOO 00000)0000 0 0 OWO) II 0 000000000 0 0000000 0 000 00000000 0 0 0 0 u D .'O r1 ,I N m 000000000000000 0 0000000 0 00000000000000 0 000 11 0m ZO C'11 n 0 m n N N to \ .'o= n N mD n DXC \ 00 N N u 00m CO my VI l)1 N Vf n -I Z M W -IM N N AC)r UI V t-1.11 N r (O (O A A p C S Z m r(Or0) rU1(0V NAAW N U1(D 0 Ar W0)V1- UI Vt VI n r -I W O)0)O) UI W N(0 UI (D 00 r 0] r CO W CO OM 000)0(0 V A A ,I UIrOU10000Amoo0ooW N OONW000 0) U10VIOWU100(D000000 0) 0)00 II 000A0000000000s4 W 000W000 UI 00000000000000 V V00 I1 00A0000000000000 A 000A000 0 00000000000000 00 0000 II U n u n n W n MD-C N N N u <0- U1 N W r 0) UI a M--I-4 00 N A00A (D -4 rU1 W Wrr0) - W A 00 U' a ZC >0 00N0) NUINO NVr(D UI OW N AN 00w000 UI 00 00 (0 milli-. V000) 0)W UIN VIN C COO)W r 0oW N NVUIWNUI V(DOr V 0 r CO n 000000)000)A00000)0 UI OONW000 V UIUIUVmwrv0U10000 V AOW n p 00A0000000000000 A 000A000 Or 000000)00000000 co UIOW u 1 II II N n< CO I I n D D C N N N N n .'O 00 I I I - I - n 1-i-IC) I I 4 I I I I N I I 4 Ar N 0) I Ww 11 DCm IWI r NIS I I WM r I VW rA r I I r 1 rot. IM N M O)r0 II ZD-f 4O)N r OAW rW0(0 0) 000)W VV A NW OO)AW AN 0) 0) 0)00r 11 (11 - - I 1 - - - ,. - . . . UM --I A(ON0)0(0AW(O 0)NWA A 00W000NN (O NON (0000)rrV00 A N rW0) n 0 N(O(OCOWCAVNNr0w0 W 00000)OWN V VNAWVAN0000O0 W 0 0000W n rAAVIOANA0)000AA(0 A 00N0)000 N UIUIUIVN0(ON000000 N 000) u I, 00(7)0000000000000 0) 0000)000 (0 00000A00000000 N 00-.J II H H77 n m v n 0 m n m7J r N n rr C) N W Nr0)1n NrN 00(0 r r Nr r00 N r n <m 00N00WONCUI0000CNr W 00Wr000 W 00(0-40rW000)Wr0000) N rON IIMZ (00)NNOrrUI C.)000000(0W (n 00AN000 W W ONO0)rU CDW 00000 U1 W VOW 11 LnNOVO,10N000NCNN W 0ON00000 (D WO(DOWVV0WC000C 0) VIOV u .1 N WW N (4(4 W W Cl) W V) (4(4(4(4 W W W W W W W W 0 C C (0(0 C 0)0)C)0) C 01 C AAAAA A A AA A AA W Z W NN W NNNN W 0 W (0000)V VVVVV VW 4)I c4 0 -1 r0 -4 WNr0 -4 O -I 0001- co-4WNrONO m 0 0 0 0 C) C) --4 -10 -4 C)M4.43 -4 -41 --1 OZZC)>-< MMMMM -1 M D MM D OmzF-+ D I-1 D -4000000000mm Z r Dm r ZZ--40) r Z 4- MZ ZZCC0000-41'1 M zao -i-iPC) I ml 1 C)r-irrrrCC 0 a -4 ND 3 z(i)MP -41 t/) 0 MMWM-4x NN M D .M '1-4 4-4 H MI- r4 x mmto 04/)DC/)mm N r D M4-4 0) W 0)r Z 9* D z4NNCDDr-ZOm C) Z MZ C) C -ID D M M m rl 1 41-I C)C)/-4 r13 D C)C) ."C ' N G) m -I Z Cl) '*1 C) 0000-4-1010-400X r/ C '1 '1 r I--4 m 0 m MMMZ4-oriM100CD Z m X0-4 I- 0 0 R. M N mZZ0<< r-1NZVM --I 0 .M OM D Z C '1 D-1-I MM'ZN 00 -' Co ID Z v) N -*1 m -41 -I -4-1m00-4Zm 0 -4 Z m 0 1-4 0 MMM M4-4m ZMNN Z O H MO 0 M -1 .'D Omm MM01-00 -4 Z r11 C -*1 N Zmm Nt/) m x D mm Cl) m N \ N m r 0m 4-4 m '+1-4 N -1 mo o < mQC 0 to 4-4 N oz N C) A N m x -41 N 1-4 C '0 Z 0 - 3 -4 M H N N N MN H O r r M-4 II- - N N - <M u N r N 0o r r r r r 0 m; HW O) -400 W ON 0 0 C) rWWrrNr N ZD U N W A(0 0 CON00 N N r VIWN0V(Or00C) 0 C-I o- - - - 11 r V WA N ON00 0 0 (0 40(401 UI Vr0000 0 0 H O 0) 0)0 N ON00 0 0 (0 00000(00000 0 0 IIA A AO 0 0000 0 0 0 000000000000 D M rl II . . . . • . . . . N m-i H O 0 00 0 0000 0 0 0 000000000000 <-< m0 0 00 0 0000 0 0 0 000000000000 0 m -41 z O C-01 0 m N N \ XIX N MD C) CO MX 11N DXC \ 00 HN N N C)0 M Co MM . H .4 N N N O) W -IZM W -4m HO 0 0 to VI 01 00 C-IM m 11- N - DMZ II C) 0 0 4)1 0 r r V r N N to WN r -4 II (0 W W C) 0 r C) 0) V 0o r000A NA IIA N NO r 000r A A V 000N,IA0000rC II O) 0 00 0o 00000 V V A 000C0A0000NN H ..4 0 00 r 000r C) 0) CO 00000000000r 11 N N MD-C H W N N r <0• UW A A N r r N �1 m-I-I 11 W 0 0 N r 0 0 W NW rV 1C• 11- - - - - - - - CDO " M 0 0 N ()I V 00 00 r V oN0 WN Mr-. m451 C) C) V V 0 00 00 (0 A N r r r A MO II 02 A AO 0) 000W W W N 000r-41-00000r HO 0 00 O) 0000) O) O) W 0000)0(0000000 HW 0 00 W 000(4 A A W 0000100000004-- 114i V► < W II II I DDC u 4)I r 44 r m C)O 41. I I I I N 4 I-4-10 nom r N 00 r r I I I 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 A D C m 11 (0 N W00 N 1 Or CO (0 W I I 1 1 WWNNN4 A ZD--i )r11-H ^4 W A(0 V 00 040 r r W (41(4N(04714Ar OO Of rN Of- 11- - - 1 - - - UN V WA (0 00)ON r 4- V rN A40Ar0000(4-4 0 um N NO A OAO(0 r r CO 0)00(00000A00000)40 1101 O 00 r 0000) 0) C) V 00000W000000000 IIA 0 00 W 000(4 W W W 0 0 0 W O r 0 0 0 0 0(0 H .-4 0 00 V 000-4 O) M V 00000000000(0 M my OM rnz M II 4-4C) m H r V r r r r r <m 40 H O W AO r 000W 0 0 0 N00A0-400000A MZ (1 11 W A 0)O V 0400tH O) O) V 4)10)A0000V0000Om N u O) A 00 0 0410N V V V Ar0V0 0)000000 A N A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A N A A A A A A A A A A A A T1n 0 V C 0 C A A A A A A A C..)W C)4.34-34.34.4(.34.3w N N N IVNN N C CII W N W UI CO COWWWWWrCDOOOCA AWNNrrUTAAWNrr CO -40 AWNNNNrrOOZ11C-I O -4 0 -4 Om-40W00000000r00)00NOONU10 -4 OrNrUANrrONrO II m r-1 01 m 01 OI -i-4v-nv3'Dma33O 0 OZC2ImMu0 0ZO n --1 Z D 0 D 0DmCCr44110--1ZMOmmOrlzmDOCODM D OOZmmr-+r-4m<D<>0 n 1 r C r ZrOMMOZZr+0r<DrUr073<C1-1-1-4M r 3mmDOMOMM )mCr u M r-1 -4Mm0 0-4MI-cZm<M-IHMnm,-1r0m= v73rr4rDDMmam N 0 • 77 C) v N r-/0m0 m>mr-1M17omvDxm2X-oV 0 > v MMv-IC) -IN-IN HM -n D 3 C Z M77 1-r731Dr+-4-XC)C)0DII.: 11--1 m ZMrxD-C 1-4 M 0110 C v m v 0-1-I1-+ rCOM-<ZZ1+\Om v)ZZmZDr1 v 000 mm 3 13Tm u C) Z w Z v MD-(M D Z C)C)C/)UZ m1.40-IZC)c:1 v) D -<R•MZ m m-IZ u M O -1 --1 r ZX -1 Z C70m\1ICm rnOr+ -4 mNG) 0 -103 Cl) I I I Misr D rI C) 1r1 In MM vZW FZC/)'0 3r Z mOmr 11 -ImmMz u v O r m 1 DO 0 \M CO0 NDCna,3D0 C/) Z 03Zr1 0 m3-IID N-i M Cl) XZ C N< CO r-I r MDI-4 C m 0—AM Z 3-0 C)r a r-1 m m \() N Or r N 04-4X - r DM m v n O M X Id 0\ MO rI -1 Cn MZ-4 0 CO Z 'ill Z D v vv Om to m m 711 r r Cl) CnN Cu 1 m N me 0 x Z m <m c r m RID Z u H Z rn OW r w f) < DZ Cro m v Z-1 On Z 0 7I HI- \ z m rt -120 M Cl) < OH n C) N < DM -4 0 C) HZ H M MO n -4 N 1-0 77 m 0 C) C) OZ u 1 C C) > > N Zm D m I1 M v rn D-1 rI Z N n D m N Cn r-I Z -4 II Z N 00 1-I Cl) n N MZ Z N M NN 0 I1 M N n 71 N cn I- N n I n u N n u u n N m M M n m N r. w N n X-I M - n v H W 0 W r Or W r N r r N r u m 3 O 0 A N NrWWNAW rN 0)rCD bo COWNCO W N00 r NrUI -4A-4 n ZD r r N 0 N rO UIN CON-)A UI U1 COrNrU1 CAA VI CO A 0 WN OA UI C000r WV-I u0-4 • - - - - - - - - - - n M M A A Cit 0 0 Ar-WA -iANO(OW0000U0AWOON A AO 0VN000AWA n 0 0 0 CO 0 0 COO A UI UI 0NOr 000W W 0ONNOON CD ON 1'.)NO o0 A0 COO oo u 0 0 0 0 000000000000000000000000 0 0000000w00A00 I1 A n D Mrs O 0 0 0 000000000000000000000000 0 000000000000 N N X--1 0 0 0 0 000000000000000000000000 0 000000000000 n O m-< 'I ZO n OM N 0 m N N N n \ M2 N N MD IID A CO M7 M II C73C \ 00 M N r 11 -10m CO .'OV CO A r r A 1 N r co n CZv W -IM co C.) CA co r 0 OrAW0) 0 W W CoA OOWUf N D--Im RI - - - 1 - - - - - - - 111-2Z r r-.1 COAW O AOC) V NrCDA Oo V UI UI -1 CD 1-.1--4 n 1 M -I UII0rNO CO -4-4Arr OOrA0 O co CO CO CD -J00 N 0 0 0 O 000N0000OA0rOANO-40000000OU) A OOONOONOOC>NO II O 0 0 W 000NO COW UI 00 COO- r0it0A00(00NW Cit CD 000x00 V OOWN-1 u 0 0 0 CO 000NONW00)00)0A0A0000rUCOCOO r 000C)00UIW0ACDA n t N n n Nm M M nXD< 4 Cit w N vC) N A r r r W co N rN mit u m-C1 -I Or40 iOo r rrr V Wr0AD W O W VV ArN IIZC• M - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • - - n N D 0 W CJ r CAwr00N01 r 4V(..) U1 00ANC UI N 111 co0 CWUI HMI-. UI 0 r ANC)orWA CO 00V0rCO 0000Nr C.) W -) CD OA OOWCO N O 0 0 CO 000VA0o(OCO1-00o0AAAVNOOA-)NUI0 0 OAON000UIO -IAU1 N O 0 0 UI 000w00000OVO03AAOr0003AU000 r 000r0000C00Nvr n 0 0 0 0 000W0-400000000A00r0000)000 N 0000004000000A u to N u u 4, M n CO I I n < C M r N r nDDO I I - I I I I I II 1 n MC)C) CO CD co I- I liar ! I 1 W I I 1 11 I I UI I r I r r N I 00 n1-4-1M 0 0 r N I r I NNrAW 1 rN 1 I Ar(0-4 OONN OO CO N CO I NOW 1 UIWN HDC-1 r r 00 0 N C) 4COVrNOAAwCrArUIWN0AW O WA wAUIr Nr000A 11 ZD u n r 1 0 0 A 0 0 0 4CD UI NrA 00 r1ON 00 A N OWV4J W CD AN 0-4N-4UI00)0000 nm 0 Cit UI V 0 OA0r-NI-OONONOArA001WV0000 Cit OA WN00o00000C0 II 0 0 0 0 000-10r00000rO0UIUIw-40OUIN-1AW CO OOONCOONCOOO)O n 0 0 0 N 000wUA00-40N04-00000004-0A4-0 co 00000004-4-0-4N00 II O 0 0 0 000UAWV000NOUI0A0000AANNr 0o 000AOOrODN00 II It n um") II x nvm II m C) r N Z m N N r r r r rrr r 0 r 1-1- N r n O Z 0 0 0 O 0000Ar00VO430-10)AOAO0tnrmAr V 000000A0)0Uw0 um-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ii O 0 0 0 0 0000V0Aral 0N0 A COrCD 0000x000 UI UI 0 0x0000000 CODA COr II 0 A A W 000000 V V 0 VO NO UICOr 4.30 00 A CO A A 0 A 0000(000(0A0 AO CD II m (n O C CO Z CO c-+ O --( m 0 0 L) --1 --I m D z r m 0 rn D• miN r D 0 Z -'1 N H C �) Z m --1 70 H (n O O 0 D --i m to m v) 1 (Si X-I I - -D H (D rn 3 I v Z D t V (1)-i - rnm I A 0 1 00 df I 0 0 0 I • > mf+ I 0 0 (n X-4 0 0 -0< 0 m rn ZO N M o m N N N.) m> I > C) CO - 1 69 OIC \ 00 I w --(073 CO 73v 1 w CZZ) w -1m I w D-(rn m - r S Z co -4 A 4 I • O I CJ O I O 0 1 rn w X D rn -D0 1 Cr) m 0 zC• ni D 1 (D m r• co 4,9 1 (D 0 I o) o I ) O (A co I I < C to DDO 3:3C)G) I () 1-1�m 1 r DC rn Z D 1 A rn 0 0o d) 1 0• 0 w 0 100 0 ✓ P▪ m v N X m N -0 73 II rn 0 v II z m I r a OZ (n I r 0 u m--( (i • 11 0 I O O■ N) O) 0 111 TENTATIVE AGENDA Energy and Transportation Committee Shakopee, Minnesota 7:00 P.M. March 17, 1993 Chairman Drees Presiding: 1. Roll Call at 7:00 P.M. 2. Approval of Minutes - November 18, 1992 3. Policy for Late Submittal of Vanpool Driver Reporting Sheets 4. 1993 Goals and Objectives 5. Spring Clean-up Day 6. Informational Items: a. Legislative Activities - Opt Out b. Legislative Update - Opt out c. Shakopee Showcase - April 19, 1993 d. Recycling Monthly Report e. Dial-A-Ride Monthly Report f. Dial-A-Ride Saturday Service Report g. Van Pool Monthly Report h. Business Update from City Hall (January 1993) i. Business Update from City Hall (February 1993) j. Business Update from City Hall (March 1993) 7. Other Business a. Next Meeting - May 19, 1993 8. Adjournment Terrie A.Sandbeck Assistant City Planner CITY OF SHAKOPEE Please Call Aggie or Terrie at 445-3650 if you cannot attend the meeting. . 9 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Regular Session Shakopee, Minnesota March 4, 1993 MEMBERS PRESENT: Madigan, Kelly, Mars, Joos, Christensen, Zak, Spurrier MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Lindberg Ekola, City Planner Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant Planner Nancy Deziel, Recording Secretary I. ROLL CALL Chrmn. Mars called the meeting to order at 7: 30 p.m. Roll call was taken as noted above. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. III. APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 4, 1993, MEETING MINUTES The meeting minutes were approved as presented, with Comm. Joos abstaining. IV. RECOGNITION OF INTERESTED CITIZENS Chrmn. Mars recognized anyone in the audience wishing to speak on any item not on the agenda. There was no response. V. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE TO THE REGULATIONS REGARDING ACCEPTABLE BUILDING MATERIALS AT 800 WEST FIST AVE. Chrmn. Mars opened the public hearing to consider an application for a variance to the regulations regarding acceptable building materials at 800 West First Ave. The Assistant Planner stated that Rahr Malting Company is requesting a variance to allow the use of building materials not listed in the Zoning Ordinance for the side of the building which abut residential zones or face a public right- of-way. The applicants are proposing to cover a portion of their new malt tower with an off-white colored metal cladding. Rahr has found it necessary to insulate portions of the new malt tower to minimize heat loss from the structure. The effect of this heat loss had not been anticipated until recently. The metal cladded areas would cover the main air flow ducts for the germination and kiln portion of the malt Minutes of the Page- 2 Board of Adjustment and Appeals March 4'1993 house. Heat loss from these areas would adversely affect the operation of the plant. She stated the applicants are proposing to cover these portions of their new malt tower building with an off-white colored metal cladding. The proposed material is similar to the material which was approved in November of 1992 for their new rail load out building. She stated that photographs have been included in the staff reports which illustrate the existing building materials used on this portion of the site. The existing load-out building exterior is covered with galvanized steel, and the existing kiln building is covered with an off-white colored steel clad panel. The Assistant Planner stated the proposed material for the malt tower is the same material and color as that used for the existing kiln building and proposed load-out building. However, the approval of this variance would make the proposed material more visible to the surrounding area than the previous request that was made by Rahr. Staff has requested that the applicant provide a sample of the material and photographs of the malt tower illustrating where the steel panels are proposed to be installed. She stated that Section 11. 60, Subd. 5 states that the Board of Adjustment and Appeals may approve the use of an otherwise unacceptable building material if it finds that: 1. The quality and appearance of the proposed materials is consistent with the standard which has been set within the district; and 2 . The approval of the use of these materials will not result in a detrimental effect on adjacent property values. She added that staff is recommending approval of the application for a variance to section 11. 60, Subd. 5, Acceptable Building Materials. Chrmn. Mars asked if there were any questions of staff. There were none. Chrmn. Mars asked the applicant or their representative to step forward. Paul Kramer, Rahr Malting Co. , 800 W. 1st Ave. , stated that Rahr Malting has looked at the design of the malt house and the heat loss to the structure and found that without some sort of insulation the malt house won't operate correctly in cold weather. He stated he is not aware of any other material to hold insulation in and has not looked into any other materials. Miinutes of the 'NM- 3 Board of Adjustment and Appeals March 4,1993 Chrmn. Mars asked if there were any questions from the Commissioners of Mr. Kramer. Chrmn. Mars asked if they were planning to use the same material they used last year on their rail load out building. Mr. Kramer answered yes. Chrmn. Mars asked Mr. Kramer the status of the condition requiring the planting of trees to the rear of the rail lines that was discussed back when they were before the Commission for the expansion of their rail shed. Mr. Kramer stated the status of that was that they do not own the property along the rail line and they haven't contacted the railroad yet as to whether they can plant trees there. He stated they would probably have to check with the Highway Dept. too, since there isn't much room between the highway and the rail line. Chrmn. Mars asked if they had taken any action on the tree planting issue. Mr. Kramer stated, no, that they have not. Comm. Spurrier and Comm. Joos stated that they would like to see Rahr come in with some choices and at least show the Commission that they have looked into other types of materials that could be used. Discussion was held on the use of the proposed material and other materials and their appearance. Discussion was held on the maintenance and life expectancy of the proposed material. Chrmn. Mars asked if there was anyone in the audience who would like to come forward and speak on the issue. There was no response. Motion: Comm. Joos/Christensen moved to close the public hearing. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Zak moved to offer Variance Resolution No. PC-654, A resolution approving a variance to Section 11. 60, Subd. 5, Acceptable Building Materials, and move its adoption. Chrmn. Mars asked if there was any discussion. Minutes of the Page- 4 Board of Adjustment and Appeals March 4,1993 Chrmn. Mars asked if they could put conditions on a variance. The City Planner stated that, yes, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals does have the authority to put conditions on a variance. Chrmn. Mars stated that they might want to make a condition of review. Discussion was held about having Rahr Malting Co. bring in some sort of plan or model showing what the building would look like with the proposed material or some other material. Motion: Comm. Joos/Madigan moved to table the original motion until the next meeting allowing Rahr Malting Co. to bring in models or plans of what the completed structure would look like with the proposed material or some other type of material, and additional facts about the proposed material. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. VI. OTHER BUSINESS: ELECTION OF OFFICERS Chrmn. Mars recommended that they hold the election of the BOAA officers after the election of the Planning Commission officers. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Zak so moved. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. VII. ADJOURNMENT The Board of Adjustments and Appeals adjourned at 8:20 p.m. OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Session Shakopee, Minnesota March 4 , 1993 MEMBERS PRESENT: Madigan, Kelly, Mars, Joos, Christensen, Zak, Spurrier MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Lindberg Ekola, City Planner Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant Planner Nancy Deziel, Recording Secretary I. ROLL CALL Chrmn. Joos called the meeting to order at 8 : 20 p.m. The roll call was taken as noted above. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was amended to add items 9b, view of the Land Use Plan Amendment; and 9c, election for the Board Of Adjustment and Appeals. The amended agenda was approved. III. APPROVAL OF THE FEBRUARY 4, 1993, MEETING MINUTES The minutes were approved as presented with Chrmn. Joos abstaining. IV. RECOGNITION OF INTERESTED CITIZENS Chrmn. Joos recognized anyone in the audience wishing to speak on any item not on the agenda. There was no response. V. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AMENDING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 376 TO ALLOW EXPANDED HOURS FOR MINING OPERATIONS LOCATED WEST OF CR 83, SOUTH OF CR 16, AND NORTH OF VALLEY VIEW RD. Chrmn. Joos opened the public hearing to consider amending Conditional Use Permit No. 376 to allow expanded hours for mining operations located west of CR 83 , South of CR 16, and north of Valley View Rd. The City Planner stated that on the table before them was a letter from the applicant requesting that the item be continued to allow for further study of noise levels. The City Planner stated that the applicant is requesting an amendment to allow the hours of operation to be expanded from 8 : 00 a.m. to 5 : 00 p.m. Monday through Friday, to 7 : 00 a.m. to 7 : 00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. The existing gravel mine is located south of CR 16 and west of CR 83 . He stated the applicant has requested the amendment in Minutes of the Page- 2 ShakoPee Planning Commission March40.956 the past. The applicant is requesting that the public hearing be continued in order to provide additional information. Chrmn. Joos asked if the applicant or their representative would come forward and address the Planning Commission. Tom Zwiers, 9390 267 St. W. , Lakeville, Mn. , stated that the sound and part of the visual of their video was erased. He stated they would have to redo it in the spring and then come back before the Commission. Chrmn. Joos reminded the audience that it was a public hearing and invited anyone wishing to address the issue to step forward. There was no response. The City Planner stated that on the table before the Planning Commission were two additional letters that were sent in recently. One from Beverly Koehnen and the other from Kenneth and Shirley Rutt. Chrmn. Joos asked if there were any other comments or questions from the Commissioners. Comm. Spurrier asked the applicant what would be the appropriate timing because they need to table the action to a specific meeting and they need to know what that timing should be. Mr. Zwiers stated they should start up around the end of April or the beginning of May. Chrmn. Joos asked if the June meeting would be possible. Mr. Zwiers stated that would be best since they have to get Twin City Testing come out and have someone do the noise analysis, the sound, and the visual. The City Planner stated that June would be an appropriate time frame for staff. The City Planner stated also that the applicant has invited the Planning Commission out into the field, as noted in their letter, to review the testing results. The City Planner stated that it might be a good idea to add the scheduling of this meeting as agenda item No. 9d. Chrmn. Joos asked if that was okay with the Commissioners. The Commissioners replied in the affirmative. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Zak moved to continue the public hearing to the June meeting. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Minutes of the Page- 3 Shakopee Planning Commission March 4,1993 VI. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: TO CONSIDER THE REZONING OF A 60 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CR 17, APPROXIMATELY 1/2 MILE SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF VIERLING DR. AND CR 17. Chrmn. Joos opened the public hearing to consider the rezoning of a 60 acre parcel located on the east side of CR 17, approximately 1/2 mile south of the intersection of Vierling Dr. and CR 17 . The City Planner stated that since the last public hearing, staff has completed the research requested. He stated they inventoried other communities where hospitals or other large institutional facilities are located. A copy of the research was provided in the staff report. He stated one of the communities they contacted was Burnsville about their Fairview Ridges facility. Their hospital is located in the R-3C district. This is the highest residential zoning district in the City of Bloomington. With that particular facility, the underline zoning is a Multi-family Residential Zoning District. The City of Edina has a specific district which is entitled the Regional Medical District. They have worked with Southdale in creating a specified district for those uses including the medical facility that is in that community. In contrast, the cities of Robbinsdale and Minneapolis have defined two district designations for their facility within their community. The Planning Commission requested that staff take a look at the R-4 , Multi Family Residential District. The R-4 district does list hospitals and clinics as conditional uses in the R-4 district. If one were to look in the R-4 district there are a series of performance standards that go with the types of projects that occur. In apartment type buildings, there are larger setbacks and screening requirements. Basically, in reviewing the schedule for St. Francis hospital, the R-4 zoning district would provide St. Francis with necessary underlying zoning provisions for the proposed schedule for the first two phases of the project. He stated that one other point in terms of research that it was discovered in the process that it is very common for communities to utilize the Planned Unit Development process for medical centers. He stated staff would encourage the use of the PUD process for a project of this magnitude. He stated it provides flexibility and it allows the Planning Commission and the City Council to review the proposed development in thorough detail. The City Planner stated that based on the research, staff is recommending that the property be rezoned to R-4, subject to Minutes of the Page- 4 Shakopee Planning Commission March 4,1993 three conditions. 1. ) Involving the PUD process; 2 . ) The subdivision platting of the property; and 3 . ) That only institutional land uses be allowed on the site until the surrounding area becomes a part of the urban service area. Condition No. three is a policy that was carried down from the Metropolitan Council to the City of Shakopee in amending the Comprehensive Plan. Chrmn. Joos asked if there were any questions of staff. There were none. Chrmn. Joos asked the applicant or their representative to step forward and address the Commission. Brian Weinreis, St. Francis Regional Medical Center, stated that they do concur with staff's recommendation and that he is available for any questions. Chrmn. Joos wanted to make sure that Mr. Weinreis understood that staff was recommending alternative No. 1, to rezone the property to R-4, and asked Mr. Weinreis if they were willing to abide by all the conditions. Mr. Weinreis stated, yes, they would. Chrmn. Joos asked if there were any questions by the Commissioners of the applicant. There were none. Chrmn. Joos asked if anyone in the audience would like to speak to the issue. Sharron Burnhagen, 11080 Oregon Curve, Bloomington, MN, stated that she owns the property immediately north of where the medical center is going to be built, and she wanted to know the impact of the zoning on her property. She questioned if her property would be zoned R-4 , commercial, or whatever she applied to have it zoned. The City Planner stated that she would still have the right to come forward and request rezoning on her property and that her property doesn't have to necessarily fall into the same R-4 designation. Ms. Burnhagen asked if it was correct that no rezoning would happen to her property unless she came in and requested the rezoning. The City Planner stated that was correct. Chrmn. Joos asked if anyone else would like to address the Planning Commission on this issue. There was no response. Minutes of the Page- 5 Shakopee Planning Commission March 4,1993 Discussion was held on spot zoning and how to avoid spot zoning in the R-4 . Discussion was held on the Burnhagen 10 acre parcel and the zoning possibilities for that property. Discussion was held on the flow capacity that has been allocated to that 10 acre tract and the availability of that use for the 10 acre parcel. Motion: Comm. Madigan/Mars moved to close the public hearing. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Motion: Comm. Mars/Zak moved to offer a motion to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning to the R-4 Zoning District subject to conditions, and move its approval. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. VII. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER THE REZONING OF THE EASTERLY 10 ACRES OF AN 18 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CR 17 AND NORTH OF VIERLING DR. Chrmn. Joos opened the public hearing to consider the rezoning of the easterly 10 acres of an 18 acre parcel located on the east side of CR 17 and north of Vierling Dr. Chrmn. Joos wanted it known that he is in the process of buying a piece of property in another subdivision from Mr. Dahlke. The City Planner stated that the applicant is requesting that the City rezone 10 acres of land. The land is currently zoned B-1, Highway Business District and is located near the northeast corner of CR 17 and Vierling Drive. The applicant is requesting that the easterly 10 acres of his 18 acre parcel be rezoned to R-2 , Urban Residential. He stated the applicant currently owns 18 acres at this interchange area and that this property is currently zoned all B-1. He stated the request would be to rezone the eastern 10 acres of this 18 acre parcel to the R-2 designation. The City Planner stated that in the staff report they provided some research as to what has happened at the CR 17/ Bypass interchange. He stated this will be a primary entrance point to the City of Shakopee. The 1980 Comprehensive Plan designated approximately 170 acres of land for commercial development at the CR 17/Bypass Minutes of the PNM- 6 Shakopee Planning Commission March 4,1993 interchange. The draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan designated approximately 110 acres in the four quadrants of this interchange. In 1992, the City approved an amendment to the 1980 Comprehensive Plan which allowed St. Francis to relocate the hospital to the southeastern quadrant of the CR 17/Bypass interchange. This amendment reduced the amount of commercial land use in the interchange area by approximately 12 acres. With this amendment, the amount of designated commercial land uses in the interchange area would be reduced to approximately 98 acres. During the public hearings for the draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan, concerns were raised with respect to the CR 17/Bypass interchange. The interchange was identified as being the primary entrance point to the urban area of Shakopee. The amount of land area for commercial development at the interchange was questioned as not being adequate for the future development needs. The planning consultant from BRW agreed with this concern and recommended additional land area south of the bypass to be designated for commercial uses. The consultant stated that the land use plan should accommodate the long range commercial possibilities of this important interchange in the City. Typically, mid-density and high-density residential uses are located in areas near commercial uses and major streets. As noted in the Comprehensive Plan, these uses are intended to provide for attached housing resulting in higher densities. These uses provide a transition area between commercial uses and single family neighborhoods. He stated the site is adjacent to the Upper Valley Drainageway, the City Trail System, JEJ Park, the Junior High School, and Country Village Apartments. These facilities or uses are beneficial to the development of higher residential densities. As proposed in Exhibit C, many of the residential lots would only allow single family detached houses. The R-2, or single family detached units, are contrary to the land use perspectives established in the Comprehensive Plan. Based on these perspectives, staff cannot support the R-2 rezoning request. The incorporation of higher density attached units could be feasible on the subject site with further study and design. Three recommendations were identified in the staff report. Minutes of the Page- 7 Shakopee Planning Commission March 4,1993 1. Recommend to the City Council denial of the application to rezone the east 10 acres of the 18 acre site from B- 1 to R-2 . 2 . Recommend to the City Council approval of the application to rezone the 10 acre parcel from B-1 to R-2. 3 . Request that the applicant amend his proposal to incorporate higher density residential land uses. The City Planner stated the action requested is to offer a motion to recommend to the City Council denial of the application to rezone the 10 acre parcel from B-1 to R-2 , and move its approval. Chrmn. Joos asked if there were any questions of staff. Chrmn. Mars asked for clarification on the location and what was being proposed by the applicant. Chrmn. Joos asked the applicant or their representative to step forward. Tim Keane of Larkin, Hoffman, Daly and Lindgren, Bloomington, stated that it is an unusual request to ask for a down zoning but in this case it would add to the practical use of this property. Mr. Keane gave a presentation supporting their request. Chrmn. Joos asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Discussion was held on the different zoning possibilities for the proposed property. Comm. Spurrier stated that he doesn't think the buffer is a major issue given the views of the Commission in the past. Chrmn. Joos reminded the Commissioners that the public hearing was still open and that he would like the Commissioners to direct their questions to the applicant at this time. Comm. Christensen asked the applicant if they considered Mid- density Zoning when they were planning their plot of land. Mr. Keane stated, yes, they have, but that they also have to be able to accommodate the market place. Comm. Mars stated the last time Mr. Dahlke was before the Commission they discussed the possibility of using trees as a buffer and asked Mr. Dahlke what his ideas were on that. Minutes of the Page- 8 Shakopee Planning Commission March 4,1993 Dale Dahlke, 1279 Limestone Dr. , Shakopee, stated the shaded area on the site plan could be landscaping or whatever the engineering or planning departments would require. He stated that he feels that the area is there to make that transition to the R-2. He stated Mid-density housing is not in demand and that is why he is proposing it the way he is. Comm. Mars stated concern over the impact of zoning from B-1 to R-2 . Chrmn. Joos asked if there were any more questions for the applicant. There were none. Chrmn. Joos asked if anyone in the audience would like to address the Planning Commission concerning the issue. There was no response. Motion: Comm. Zak/Kelly moved to close the public hearing. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Vote: Comm. Spurrier/Mars moved to recommend to the City Council the approval of the application to rezone the 10 acre parcel from B-1 to R-2 . The City Planner stated that the amount of commercial area has been reduced over that area. He stated it is very hard to identify a specific acreage amount of commercial that's needed. Comm. Mars stated that he feels they should draw more attention to the bypass and a little less attention to the Vierling Dr. area. The City Planner wanted to clarify that Multi-Family Zoning would serve as a transition between commercial and single family uses. Buffers would consist of landscapes, berms, etc. The City Planner stated there are other alternatives that could be considered, such as apartments, etc. , but rezoning to the R-2 would allow only single family homes, twin homes, or duplexes. He stated that rezoning to the R-3 would allow for single family, twin homes, and also three and four-plexes. Discussion was held about the proposed street layout. Comm. Spurrier stated that he doesn't feel B-i is the appropriate zone for the proposed 10 acre parcel. He stated that he feels rezoning to R-2 would be a more appropriate use. Minutes of the Page- 9 Shakopee Planning Commission March 4,1993 Chrmn. Joos asked if there were any more questions or comments. There were none. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. The Planning Commission took a 10 minute recess from 9:40 to 9:50. VIII PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE STONEBROORE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF STONEBROORE 2ND ADDITION, LOCATED SOUTH OF CR 78, EAST OF CR 79 AND WEST OF TIMBER TRAILS ADDITION. Chrmn. Joos opened the public hearing to consider an amendment to the Stonebrooke Planned Unit Development and the Preliminary Plat of Stonebrooke 2nd Addition, located south of CR 78, east of CR 79 and west of Timber Trails Addition. The Assistant Planner stated that Laurent Builders is requesting an amendment to the PUD in order to: 1. Reallocate four of the unused twin home lots from the 1st Addition into the 2nd Addition; 2 . Change the proposed commercial development of Outlot A into two single family residential lots; and 3 . Allow a 32 car expansion of the golf course parking lot. Concurrent with this request, the applicant is requesting approval of the preliminary plat for Stonebrooke 2nd Addition. The proposed plat is 22 . 6 acres in size and is located in the northwestern portion of the PUD. The Shakopee City Council approved the final PUD for Stonebrooke in July of 1987 . The PUD included 74 single family lots and 9 twin home lots (18 units) for a total of 92 dwelling units. The approval of the PUD also included the eighteen hole golf course. Outlot A, located directly south of the golf club house, was reserved for future development as it had not been determined at that time if commercial development was appropriate in that area. She stated the 1st Addition of the Stonebrooke PUD was approved by the City Council in January of 1988, and it included the golf course, 25 single family lots and 5 twin home lots. The original PUD approved 27 single family lots and 4 twin home lots to be platted with the 2nd Addition. Minutes of the Page-10 Shakopee planning Commission March 4,1993 Although the approval of both the PUD and the Final Plat for the 1st Addition allowed 5 lots to be developed with twin homes, the applicant is proposing that all 30 lots within the subdivision be developed with single family homes in the 1st Addition. Outlot A from the 1st Addition is located directly south of the golf course clubhouse. The outlot was reserved as it was not determined at that time if commercial development was appropriate in the area. The applicant is proposing to plat this outlot into two residential lots and eliminates the proposed commercial development. The platting of these two single family residential lots would increase the gross density from . 47 units per acre (94 units) to .48 units per acre (96 units) . The applicant is proposing that Fairhaven Drive be constructed approximately 1300 feet east of CR 79 and dead end until Phase 3 develops. The Preliminary Plat illustrates Fairhaven Drive as being constructed through the PUD and connecting with Wood Duck Trail. Off of Fairhaven Drive, two permanent cul-de-sac streets (Abby Point and Cambridge Way) would be constructed with Phase 2 . The Assistant Planner stated that the subdivision regulations states that cul-de-sac streets are limited to 1, 000 feet within the rural service area. The current regulations don't address temporary or phased construction of streets. The subdivision regulations would prohibit Fairhaven Drive from being constructed beyond this 1, 000 foot dimension, and only allow the developer to plat six of the proposed lots off of Fairhaven Drive. In May of 1992, the City Council adopted an interim policy on cul-de-sac street lengths. This policy included a 200 average daily trips formula as one criteria in granting variances to overlength streets. This interim policy was effective until September 1, 1992 . On February 24, 1993 , staff received a letter from Kent G. Harbison of Fredrikson & Byron. This firm represents Bert and Bonnie Notermann in their dispute with the Stonebrooke Golf Course and Laurent Builders over the development of the Stonebrooke PUD. Mr. Harbison requested that copies of this letter be provided to the Planning Commission. She stated staff has identified three alternatives in the staff report: 1. Limit the construction of Fairhaven Drive to 1000 feet east of CR 79 in conformance with the current subdivision regulations. A total of 9 dwelling units could be constructed. Minutes of the Page-11 Shakopee Planning Commission March Al,1993 2. Recommend the re-adoption of the policy for establishing criteria for overlength cul-de-sac streets. One of the criteria considered with the previous policy was the 200 average daily traffic volume. If this criteria were applied, either Block 8 or Block 13 could possibly be final platted in the 2nd Addition. A motion to table consideration would also be needed with this alternative. 3 . Recommend denial of the proposed PUD amendment and the preliminary plat. Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission continue the public hearing and table their recommendation to the City Council regarding this proposal to allow the City Council to consider the readoption of the overlength cul-de-sac street policy. Chrmn. Joos asked if there were any questions of staff. There were none. Chrmn. Joos asked the applicant or their representative to step forward. Randy Laurent, Laurent Builders, stated that he did not have a presentation at this time. Chrmn. Joos asked if there were any questions for Mr. Laurent. There were none. Chrmn. Joos reminded the audience that it was a public hearing and invited anyone wishing to speak to the particular issue to step forward. Kent Harbison, representing Bert and Bonnie Notermann, stated that had the Notermanns received proper notice of the original Planned Unit Development from the developers in a timely basis, they would have voiced much stronger objection to the original proposal. Mr. Harbison made a presentation outlining the concerns of the Notermanns that they wanted the Planning Commission to be aware of. Discussion was held between Mr. Harbison and the Commissioners on the concerns that Mr. Harbison listed. Bert Notermann, 812 E. CR 78, Shakopee, gave a presentation on his wildlife refuge and expressed his concerns about the applicant's proposals. Chrmn. Joos asked if there were any questions for Mr. Notermann. Minutes of the Page-12 Shakopee Planning Commission March 4,1993 Comm. Mars asked if the private wildlife refuge was posted. Mr. Notermann replied, yes, that it was. Chrmn. Joos asked if anyone else in the audience would like to address the Planning Commission on the issue. Dalles Plekkenpol, 2433 CR 79, stated concern over the increased number of twin homes being proposed. Steve Heller, 620 CR 78, stated concern over the proposed twin homes. He also stated that he can verify some of Mr. Notermann's concerns regarding the people using the golf course because he has witnessed them also. Chrmn. Joos asked if anyone else would like to address the Planning Commission. There was no response. Chrmn. Joos asked Mr. Laurent if he would like to step forward at this time. Mr. Laurent stated that he would go along with tabling the recommendation to the City Council. He addressed the cul-de-sac issue and the twin home issue. He stated that he feels people have a misconception regarding twin homes and he wanted to assure everyone that they would not be putting up cheap housing. He stated they do not have a problem designating two sites for each unit. Chrmn. Joos asked if there were any questions for Mr. Laurent. There were none. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Zak moved to continue the public hearing until the April 8th meeting. Discussion was held about whether the Commission would have to wait until the litigation was concluded in order to get some of their questions answered that would enable them to make a decision on the matter. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. IXa. OTHER BUSINESS: ELECTION OF OFFICERS Comm. Joos was voted in as Chrmn. of the Planning Commission by unanimous vote. Comm. Mars was voted in as Vice Chrmn. for the Planning Commission by unanimous vote. Minutes of the Page -13 Shakopee Planning Commission March Al, 1993 Comm. Christensen was voted in as Second Vice Chair for the Planning Commission by unanimous vote. IXb. OTHER BUSINESS: SET PUBLIC HEARING LAND USE DATE The City Planner stated they were looking to set Thursday, March 25th at 7 : 30 P.M. as the meeting date for the public hearing for the amendment to the Land Use Plan. Also added to that agenda would be a Final Plat request for approval for Prairie Estates 3rd Addition. X. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10 : 45 p.m. XI. REOPENING OF BOAA FOR ELECTION OF OFFICERS Comm. Mars was voted in as Chrmn. of the BOAA by unanimous vote. Comm. Kelly was voted in as Vice Chrmn. of the BOAA by unanimous vote. Comm. Zak was voted in as Second Vice Chair of the BOAA by unanimous vote. XII. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10: 50 p.m. ' Of MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Lindberg S. Ekola, City Planner RE: Proposed Land Use Plan Amendments 1990 Comprehensive Plan DATE: March 10, 1993 NON-AGENDA INFORMATION ITEM: In preparing the East Shakopee Area Transportation Study and the Comprehensive Sewer Plan it has been determined that several changes or revisions are needed on the Land Use Plan prior to the further efforts by the City's consultants on these projects. Staff is preparing a Land Use Plan Study to address the land use issues which have been identified. A public hearing has been scheduled for the Planning Commission for Thursday, March 25, 1993 at 7: 30 P.M. to review the proposed Land Use Plan Amendments. The Land Use Plan and the Planning Commission recommendation will be brought forward to the City Council at the next available meeting. Included with the Land Use Plan Amendment will be proposed changes to the Racetrack District. If members of the Council have any questions or would like additional information, please contact me at 445-3650. Thank you. RESOLUTION # 396 A Resolution Establishing Water Rates In and For the City of Shakopee BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, in regular session assembled on the 1st day of March, 1993 , that the following water rates shall be, and hereby are established for all users of water furnished by the City of Shakopee through the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission; 1 st 6 , 000 Gal . per quarter: $6 . 49 per Quarter next 94 , 000 Gal . per quarter: $0 . 98 per 1 , 000 Gal . next 900 , 000 Gal . per quarter: $0 . 76 per 1 , 000 Gal . over 1 , 000 , 000 Gal . per. quarter: $0 . 59 per 1 ,000 Gal . The minimum billed in any quarter shall be: METER SIZE : 5/8 x 3/4 inch $6 . 49 per quarter 3/4 inch 6 . 49 per quarter 1 inch 27 . 00 per quarter 1 1/2 inch 43 . 30 per quarter 2 inch 64 . 90 3 inch per quarter 4 inch 108 . 00 per quarter 6 inch 162 . 00 per quarter 8 inch 216 . 00 per quarter 324 . 00 per quarter 10 inch 433 . 00 per quarter The new water rates will be used and will be effective immediately following the normal March , 1993 meter readings , and will apply to all water use thereafter. Passed in Regular Meeting of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission held this 1st day of March , 1993 . Barry Kirdhmeier, President ATTEST : i '9-- MEMO TO: Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator FROM: Fulton Schleisman, Building Official Jeanette Shaner, Secretary RE: Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) - Credits DATE: March 9, 1993 Attached please find a report from the MWCC which summarizes the SAC credits forthcoming to the City. As noted in Ms. Selby's letter dated February 25, 1993, MWCC has approved credits totalling $10, 600. 00 at this time. Accordingly, this will mean revenue to the City in like amount which will be realized over the next couple of months depending on the volume of SAC collections. The Building Department is continuing to develop and monitor additional credits as they occur. For example, the structures removed for the downtown bridge/bypass construction will engender credits when the properties are covered by new construction. We are currently doing the necessary research to optimize the potential credits. The estimated credit revenue for this project area is $15, 000 - $20, 000. We will continue to monitor the SAC credit situation and supply timely notice of projected revenues. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612 222-8423 February 25, 1993 Jeanette Shaner Building Department City of Shakopee 129 E. 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Ms. Shaner: This letter is in reply to your credit request remitted to us on November 10, 1992 . A review of the records for the City of Shakopee results in previously unclaimed SAC credits amounting to $10, 600. This credit amount was determined by using the SAC rate in effect at the time of new use of each site. The attached MWCC 92UCR form provides the detail regarding the redevelopment of the various sites. This $10, 600 credit should be applied to offset charges on your next monthly report (s) . Enter this amount into the SAC Credit Balance area of form MWCC 92A and attach the white copy of the approved 92UCR form. This credit balance must be depleted prior to making any cash payment. If I may be of further assistance please contact me at 229-2118 . Sincerely, /ice ,/da— ,Z�r Sandra L. Selby Administrative Assistant SLS:mu Attachment Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer x IP J J J I al Ui Ul U1 U"I Ui U) Ui W 1 m0 U1 > • W W J CO a) cn cn to In u-i U1 co Io T 3 N N 1- UI W W W W W W W O O fA IA U7 J J J J J J l0 m = O m77 O o 0 c c�,4 n ym z a ---i • • \ V \ •• m n. 7 n a C :o$ NiO Ni W l0 F-' I-- 1--' I--. F- N F-' U'1 m -O m ,A c ' o a o m 1 III II II II I I n � CD cn O - 0 I--, I-' I--, F-' F-' F-' F-+ I-- F-' F-. I✓ I--' m :;(7 - w I S1) Lc) to Lc) Lc) Lc) l0 lD l0 l0 l0 l0 l.0 CO CO CO CO OD CO CO 00 CO CO CO J q' O n al (D Cr) 0> a1 OO U7 W Ni Ni Ni Ni Ni Ni a1 Tri c 3 cn 11- n n o ( o rt CD D F-' I-. CO F- fA fl=. Ni Ni N Ni N N 3 Q A m o o W W W W W Ni F-' W ' C) Co Pt, 3 m W al 00 cl J W co W a1 ,�A•Sl: al �`�" a = _� n-' co m m t'i ty �7 Y 1 E E -'::i' c) 5 -er, (D g• 3 • • • co rt (D (D (D (D t i (D _:.::-::.:•?::' O _• F co = Cl) I-. cn (n Cl) (n Cl) (n — a E. o K H F F F-' rt N 0 rt rt rt rt rt rt > to I i N Cl) S i (D 0 a * D F, E 7 rt rt K Ni K SZ U7 \.(n U7 .A a=. .A O = L) k0 o 'c' (n rt rt rt. rt rt rt m O l0 0 SZ Cl) Cl) mo n Ni o C C �' rt rt m ^ .: 'T1 >' .' ff II I-' C (D CD < < < < < < o. s c f ; 1--, (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D3:1' „ v (D (D it rt 5 0 711 ii 3 a () (D (D (D (D (D (D o m C7-Jo w > oil C ,- m n .-. c ���) c = m :Dr n f c)^ 0 Cn (n Cn cn 7'./ Cn cn CA cn m m m Z;" ..�ti-:i>:s}}:::::::: ::::.........:::::: -........... i:<�: ::: i:.2::ii:ii:� :: -i,. CC p NOoZ n A)O m m a.o co n m f't1<�. m • c° o 1 0 1- 01 ? o 3 ` D: ao lfl I--. 1- F I--' f--. F-' I-. ::X:cr '..:: 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 0 p) rn C7 m F-' I-. I-. F"' I-. I-' I-. I--' I-. F-a I-. I--' > :=t: - -' M l0 l0 l0 lfl l0 lD to lI) lfl l0 lfl 1/40 m _71.3 0 co CO lD CO co 00 CD a) a) co co J � * `fl D J J Y U1 W Ni Ni ' Ni Ni Ni NJ 01 : :3 C W if = ' Q v O: ,y n x �, x ro ro ro ro ro ho ro Fd Po it <' m In. :: F £ F K Sv Sv Sv Sb SL Sv Sy Sv Sb ir::::::: c • '•C .4'< F'• K K K K K K K K K > � ° %% (—_, rT < x x x x x x x x x o D > ::::: s rt 1--' rt F-' Sv F • F• F'• F F• F• F' F to tort y '<'1 c rt F-. rt F-' (D 1C.2 .R • • LQ • • LQ y C K G) tl t-1 L-1T S' v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c) o ,/, K rt- rtrt rt rt rt rt n 0 H 1 t. -.. r r 11) z m .. S SD Sv m o_ ''.....7-) (D (D (n m - o m w .---...-.......•,..,-,- ..---1 m K m ET m CD m S C ' ,, „. �, m n m i m : :. ::- :• cn o c � : -{.:::: { >:�>:�:i:-:-:o: {{y :-�: »:{: i:ii�i: i� iii�_;: {•%�'•:i ::::`•:%%;::;_>:�:;:>:;:; :� ;:{.;:: .,:�>. . '9 � OC1;. - • O:i ' n. -ii.�:LiF > Q Mi .Vii:;:.. 0 .+rx:.. •::}:::i is __ O ........... ili i::'vl..{} :1.;l., ~i2�i-?:, is�3CT%.�:, m\L'vi: ��r^�]ti.\h......... --: :.: :::: .......:.... ii: V Nag Igifi •'moi :::':•{i: : :::n...:..:...... :... ........vim T MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director RE: Market Street/Minnesota Street Rail ad Crossings DATE: March 10, 1993 NON-AGENDA INFORMATIONAL ITEM FOR COUNCIL In December, 1992, the City Council directed the City Attorney to write a letter to the Chicago & NorthWestern Railroad threatening legal action due to the lack of action regarding the installation of the new signals at the above referenced railroad crossings . Staff would like to update Council on this issue. The railroad has completed the installation of the signals at both crossings and the signals at Minnesota Street are fully operational . The only remaining work is to install the rubberized crossing at Market Street in order to open this crossing up. This work cannot be done until spring thaws are complete and the construction season resumes . Based on the above action, staff has decided not to send the letter to the railroad as directed by Council and staff wanted to notify Council of this decision. TAMI/RAILROAD.DH DH/tiv FRED 1.CORRIGAN Executive Director j I IERRY-ANDERSON THE MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION / Assr.Exe<wwe Dtreaor FILLIF1111%1 FORMERLY MINNESOTA GOOD ROADS,INC. March 9, 1993 / Mayor Gary Laurent City of Shakopee City Hall - 129 E. 1st Ave. Shakopee,MN 55379 Dear Mayor Laurent: Once again Governor Arne Carlson has reneged on his promise to support transportation funding legislation in 1993. The Governor's latest actions will impact not only the state transportation systems serving your City, but also the revenues your City will receive from the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund. The Minnesota Transportation Alliance supports Senate File 794, a transportation funding bill introduced by Senators Chmielewski, Langseth, Hanson and Belanger. The bill creates a mobility trust fund, increases the motor fuels tax by 5 cents per gallon dedicated to the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund, imposes a 1% transportation tax on the sale of motor vehicles dedicated to the mobility trust fund for transit and other transportation purposes, amends the definition of highways and permits highway trust funds to be used for additional purposes in a highway corridor. We have included the language of this bill with this mailing. I urge you and your City Council to contact your legislators in support of S.F. 794 and to outline the state and city projects in your area that will be delayed without an increase in state funding. We hope you will contact the Governor to tell him that he cannot put the state's investment in transportation infrastructure at risk by failing to support funding legislation. We urge you to contact Mn/DOT Commissioner James Denn and your local Mn/DOT District Engineer and discuss the impact of no funding increase to your transportation program. The Commissioner is your agent in administering the state-aid highway funds in the Highway Trust Fund. We need the assistance of your City Council if we are to be successful in passing a transportation funding bill in 1993. Now is the time to get involved. Thanks for your support of The Minnesota Transportation Alliance. Yours sincer , Iz -r ��'y l F).ed J. Co • /Executi irector Enclosed: Alliance Legislative Position Summary - S.F. 794 Star Tribune Editorial - 3/5/93 St.Paul Pioneer Press Dornfeld article - 3/8/93 cc: Dave Hutton, Shakopee City Engineer 3402 UNIVERSITY AVENUE S . MINNEAPOLIS,MINN 55414 612-379.7227 FRED J.CORRIGAN 1 1 1 ____ Executive Director JERRY.>NDERSON THE MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION Aso Executive Director PILLIMIAILLl FORMERLY MINNESOTA GOOD ROADS,INC. TRANSPORTATION FUNDING ALLIANCE LEGISLATIVE POSITION (Adopted by Alliance Board of Directors - 2/19/93) The legislation: • increases the motor fuels tax by 5 per gallon • amends the definition of [road or highway] and defines [highway purpose] • makes changes to the distribution of highway aid allocated to cities • permits the use of the additional revenue from the increased motor fuels tax to the trunk highway fund for non-highway transportation infrastructure investment • proposes a new formula for distribution of County State-Aid Highway (CSAH) funds • defines "Public Transit facilities " • establishes the Mobility Trust Fund and the Surface Transportation Fund • provides for an annual gasoline and special fuels tax rate adjustment • dedicates to the Mobility Trust Fund the proceeds from a 1% transportation tax on the purchase of any motor vehicle purchased or acquired in Minnesota. The proposed taxes would raise: • $110 . 0 million per year from a 5 motor fuels tax increase • $49 . 0 million per year from the 1% transportation mobility tax. 3402 UNIVERSITY AVENUE SE. MINNEAPOLIS,.MINN 55414 612379.7227 H. F. Revisor's draft 93-1003= S.F. SUBJECT: Omnibus transportation funding bill AUTHORS: s COMMITTEE: s ANALYST: John Williams, 296-5045* DATE: * nVFgyru This bill contains three articles. The first expands the uses for which dedicated highway user tax revenue may be expended and makes changes in the municipal state-aid street system. The second article creates a Minnesota mobility trust fund for both transit and highway purposes. The third article increases the state motor fuel tax to 25 cents per gallon and piovides for a one percent increase << .he motor : ; iicie excise tax with the t;' nue dedicated to the mobility rust fund. Article 1 County Highway and City Streets Section 1 Definition of "highway." Amends the definition of "highway" in the laws governing the trunk highway system and highways generally. Presently the definition includes all classes of highways including cartways and bridges. This section would expand the definition to say that a highway is a right-of-way and related facilities designed primarily for the efficient transportation of people and goods. 2 Definition of city. Defines "city" in highway law to include both statutory and home rule charter cities. This is a technical change. Research Department Minnesota House of Representatives 600 State Office Building H. F. 3 Highway purposes, fuel tax revenue. Provides that revenue in the trunk highway fund derived from the fuel tax increase in article 3 may be expended for projects in trunk highway corridors that include transit facilities and are designed to (1) maximize federal ISTEA (intermodal surface transportation efficient act) matching funds, (2) contribute to achieving federal clean air act standards for congestion mitigation and ambient air quality standards, (3) relieve congestion, (4) conserve energy, and (5) reduce highway damage and other costs of highway use. Specifies that these are "highway purposes. " Defines "public transit facilities" as capital facilities (other than vehicles) that provide regular transit service to the general public. 4 Mileage of municipal state-aid street system. Increases the maximum mileage of the municipal state-aid street system from 2 , 500 to 3 , 000 miles. (Under both present law and this bill the MSA mileage also includes former trunk highways turned back to city jurisdiction. ) 5 Determination of population. Allows a special census, or a population estimate by the metropolitan council or state demographer, to be used to establish population for purposes of eligibility for the municipal state-aid system. Under present law only the most recent federal ten-year census may to used to determine population. Extends for the 1990 census the same provisions that were made for cities that became ineligible for the MSA system after the 1980 census but were still within 15 percent of The minimal 5, 000 population figure. Under this provision those cities' MSA apportionments will be phased out over three years rather than immediately. 6 Municipal screening board. Changes the composition of the municipal state-aid screening board that screens money needs for the MSA system. (Money needs account for 50 percent of the MSA distribution formula. ) Presently the board is made up of one city engineer from each transportation department construction district, plus the city engineer of each first- class city. Under this section it would be consist of two city engineers from the metropolitan construction district, one city engineer from each of the other districts, and the city engineer of each first-class city. 7 Effective date. Makes the article effective January 1, 1994 . Article 2 Funds for Transportation Section Research Department Minnesota House of Representatives 600 State Office Building H. F. 1 Transit assistance fund. Provides that the transit assistance fund receives money from the mobility trust fund established in section 2 . The transit assistance fund was originally set up to receive the transit share of dedicated revenue from the motor vehicle excise tax. 2 Mobility trust fund. Establishes the mobility trust fund and provides for its uses. Subdivision 1. Establishment. Establishes the fund. Subd. 2 . Apportionment. Makes an unspecified apportion of the fund between the transit assistance fund and the surface transportation fund (provided for in section 3) . Subd. 3 . Investment. Provides for investment of money in the mobility trust fund. 3 Surface transportation fund. Amends the purposes for which the surface transportation fund may be used. Subdivision 1-2 . Establishment, uses. Establishes and recodifies the surface transportation fund. The surface transportation fund was established in 1991 legislation generally to provide a fund to pay for a number of activities that are now being funded from the trunk highway fund. These activities in the 1991 law were public safety department activities on driver licensing and motor vehicle registration, Mn/DOT permit and highway beautification programs, motor carrier regulation, repayment of various kinds of transportation ;:;(-=rids, .:a: .: oad grade crossing pot cticn, ar:d the t :a:;_.l) .ation study board (inactive since 1991) . This section would add: -- maintenance and improvement of trunk highways and local state-aid highways and streets; -- bridge repair and replacement; -- highway safety programs; -- transit system planning and design, transit vehicle purchase, and other transit assistance. Subd. 3 . Apportionment. Provides that money remaining in the surface transportation fund after the legislature has made appropriations for the uses that were lawful in the 1991 legislation must be allocated on the basis of population to each of the Mn/DOT construction districts. Specifies that of the money allocated to each district, 62 percent must be for trunk highway projects and 38 percent for eligible projects (including both highways and transit) proposed by cities and counties. Subd. 4 . Investment. Provides for investment of the surface transportation fund. Research Department Minnesota House of Representatives 600 State Office Building H. F. 4 Repealer. Repeals the existing law establishing the surface transportation fund. 5 Effective date. Makes the article effective July 1, 1993 . Article 3 Vehicle and Fuel Taxes Section 1 Fuel tax increased. Provides that the state tax on gasoline is raised from 20 to 25 cents from July 1, 1993 , to March 31, 1994 . Subsequent rates are as provided in section 2. (Under present law an increase in the state gasoline tax automatically applies to the state tax on diesel fuel. ) 2 Annual fuel tax increases. Provides that the fuel tax rate will be adjusted on April 1 of each year by a formula that increases the tax by the previous year's rate of inflation, further adjusted by the rate of change in fuel consumption in the state. Under this formula, if the rate of consumption goes down, the inflation adjustment goes up, and vice versa. 3 Motor vehicle excise tax. Imposes an addition one percent transportation tax on top of the present 6. 5 percent motor vehicle excise tax. The revenue from the tax would be dedicated to the mobility trust fund. 4 Effective Date. Makes the article effective July 1, 1993 . Research Department Minnesota House of Representatives 600 State Office Building cnv':y = _ _ _ ' = � ;. fir- _ ' _'` C D to Cr r� r; OO =- -, —•-� = = - _.^. _ - to_. - r; _ •_r n r, = W C ^• < < r = :< ^ r: -.v •• -- - H `! r: C-�., ur _ G .• C .n n - -- C N r: cfn �, _n - yk = nom� _ =s_ r - w n 0 cr C ynC C.r �pC�' rO - _par% _ t _ 23 y'- _ _ , - C _ n JtCCID 7 _ ;nom ^ OHnr<< u" - n � 23In = � 'v ;< - :n n V) n n < n j n vii 7- n - - - =•n O = . /� C C C r: - -t p _ n 23 -. n w ��/ 3 A nCA _ nv —= =•n n _ y _ 33 k rn = I C...7' r. I -_23 r• a2. -, _ =.• C 7 - I r: '', O Op v v' pop + -OO D n.0 = n ^•n > n n _-3 rr n - n my j.7 5 � G v C • < < n • S co �'n n ....•012 r- > O :ii ,a a Sr v _ — _ .• vX QN �� -, N r) F3' C n : _ O nrp ao < - - CO One CD Z: J— v' n < p • < y n^— . , l 33 O_.yjo0 yr1 n rrycn • y O n .� JV' :A p -. ^ Oamn = pp. _ n -• < _. = .. G _ O �n m =: G _ 0, 23 n - -n = -•yp - -tO -13- On an ' '' c- mi r) 7- O c. n n _ O rC n - .i v Cp n = n -• _ -. n 77 O ' N n -• < : C OCr9n H (A = n = O < O -?_ _• 1.•4 n - -• C N '= G._ O `. -•O Ori -- < -, O 4.4^ O 0 2) m-, .•-N ` nom _- 4 3e •r3 as -•:a, N Sn -0 =a' "'� - n -•2 -' - n = -�- - °°0o _ ^ ny r_ n � O7 n �� ( � '' In r)•O ,-n �_ .'n- x _ A < --' A = CD a7 .� _ _. - -'n .-". -v —rJ V; 0. y n _ n_ �_ A- -•- _.= J n y n e'9 - `7 A _.b9 0 N n 7 7. 0 -• C. _ `7 = n n O = to JC. - xi mau •2uo1 o0; 1e; 10; lamuonenlels e u! sluawanoldw! a2puq pue riemy2!y sa a a e away;a uo lead uo ang o)paalo;uaaq sey l!suel)'2uipun} uaym awn a le 2u!pan; )!sue11 paseafu! uo au!!ayi ply y ley; yl y; • in asealau! ue lnoy)!m sleari om) layloue y;!m 2uole o2 lou)y2!w riays,-slaxewmel )xau uollaala-a1 .0; u2ledwea o) s)uem 1o} 2uole dwg of alge aq 1142iw waisris alelslno Auew sulaauoa tp!ym 'we.2old uosj.1 3 ana!laq slap) :axly xel a pod riemy2ly ay; an .ado; nluo Ilea am uo!)an1)suoa riemy2!y s.alels ay; u! aloy -dns o) 2u!sn;a1 alai., sueallgndag-luap ala; punole a2elnoa am 1ea,S a uogl!w Sgt ay; 2nld of 2u!ypou -uadapul asnoli asneaaq sem 1! !Ae s -1}exldsu! uea am agrievi„ -p!es aoy4 ,•'ans saop la2pnq uospeO ay; 'lanoaloy!; an slanlasgo awog •2nld a4; pallnduos aq a uo ;uaujanow awos )a2 01 antepa)u!1d -pep 'a2exaed ay; l!anun 0l aauala}u0a aq riw am 'Aem ues!)1ed!q e u! 1ay1a2ol uana ale salnpayas snq mau at ala;aq scald s,uuaQ jo ana ayi uo 'lanamoH xlom am ;! ley) uo!u!do ay) jo a1•aM„ xaolq 2ulddoya ay) uo ;las)! pu!; moo •(,;sasodlnd 1Semuelq ) pappjsal sanuanal 'aas 0) 4x!1 Plnom nay) ate )1SUe1) 'S66I u! lle;11oys la2pnq ams mau Si asn 1!aq)) l- o} -xaed }o put ay) ri}!Pads o1 papadxa ale 1ay)oue Jo pooy!lax!I ay; uanlrj •lsaq le xe;au!lose2 jo asn ay;2u!;)!wlad a2ueya •1ew1IjM-' I'uosuyo f ueaQ lapea' ri)!1ou uo!)nlos rilerodwa; e aq pinom sun Ing [euo!lnl!)suoa e pue xel au!lose2 ay) -!yl{a)euas pue'au!xsrg-9,dQ `aoy!; 1a2o13 •xaam )se! para}}o ay suo!)epuawwoaal u! asealaw uolle2 a luaa-g e 10; 2ulllea .$uoI lapea7 rillloleyy a)euas 'xaam sup awn 1a2pnq pas!na1 al{) u! '3!sue11 10; uo!ll!w mg e uo 2ulxlom sem 'uual sawef '1a -awns anss! all uo )Uawaal2e ue a21o3 Szt apnpu! p!p uoslleD '1!PaJa s!y oi -uolss!wwoa uo!1e)lodsuel)s'H -Piss! ay) ool ICJ .O J 01 11o);a ue u! 2unaaw sem slolelsl2al •1o)aop ay; pue rilaaol2 ay; 0) sd!1; le!) uo dlyslapeal 1a;;o,Slleuy pinom uoslle3 late u0;lEn.E1s na! j aney rills a o aleadde 1! 'ole sxaam ma} e I!lun ;o dno12 uespled!q e `pate ;cel Jo sV -uassa 2u!xedi ril[ ;;.p Pl � P •x>>; ri$laua lelapa; t uo Pill )!swell 10; 2U!o2 sanuanl lenuue u! uo!l s.agwnu 2u!seanu!alaym 'sapunoa a)e)l 3 -11w 6q$ all; Jo 110;111w LZt lseal le 111!m -lno Oz )noge u! saa!nlas ;ism* ;Pune ua 12e'xe) eu so olds s u u 3u! a p!Saj 01 paaoj uaaq 'sue°uo xe)sales luaolad I mau e asodw! dlay mom os 10 uogl!w gt aylouV 1ci awjl Hyl nn; s!„ sun ley; aaam SalElosuui� nmoM_ Os1P -,• -nnnv4 v swap C (o vrj, au![oseE ayi asealau! — IR y)as2ue'ayi cjiapla 'luno ay) 1o; rillligow .aleal2 Ise! p!es aH -anss! 2u!pun} uo!le)lodsuell UI ltsuEll axil — pinom ley) 'slsala)u! )1SUe1) pue 2u!p!nold pue uo!)sa2uoo ay}e.; 2upnp ay) wo1; un.; pue ;no sey uoslle0 auiy riemyb!y;0 uo!)lleoz e'aaue!IIV uonepod -a1 'luaolad gI Aq d!yslap!1 )sooq o) pal -nod 'lean an!)naasuoa p!y) ay) 103 -sue1Z e)osauu!yq ay; Aq [esodold V■ -aadxa s!spa salnol ssaidxa mau 8z snld -prey riluald :lamsue )ualedde ayi 3ovd°v Patio; -. •pun; lelaua2 s•a;eis ay) wo1} )!suer) `aalnras alnol 1e[n2a1 Jo sa[!w uo!ll!w g.g Lspaau uo!)e)lodsuel) le)!n paw Vd 1VIssv l. uo! 1w :.to} uounw La ap!nold pue xe) au!losea ppe pinom riayi •slaluaa 2u!ddoys way; dial{ 01 lean e uo!ll!w SZIt 10 [ --aq)u!asealau!)ua3-g e y2no.1q)sriemy2!y ;o;sow -sgny leuo;2al gI pue sumolumop OOit layloue pu!;o) aq 1! pinoa prey mol euo!)! a ue Om) ay) P e ro s a2 n a!uo1 P s•a)els ay) r' 10; lean a uo!ll!w O;It I PP unole aa!nlas az!ue210 o) asod lig sll ;) 4 ) P y y as!e1 plum.. ley; 'uopuriio-I,yG -ylas2ueZ -old sapua2e )!suer) leuo!2a. 'sJea.S om) o) u0gnlos 2u!)se1 e a21o}o;a2elnoa pue yip); vas Aq palosuods a.nseaw V V. lxau ay; lana uo!ll!w NS)sapow a 1o,y uo!s!n ay;4 neyl slapeal ualedde s,)3 lou �•f • .s!Iodeauu!y1 pue lned -is umo) .sgin 1ouJano2 ay; ra )!au ley;; -umop uaamlaq awll!er)y2!I e }o u0) -qns ay; saw! 1! 2u!puedxa pue saw aloa -)!swell pue ' -annsuoa alq!ssod ay;1o; algellene spun; ay) in aalnlas 2u;soldw! 'wa)sas snq ay) s:Semy2!11 10} 2u!pun} pasealau! Jo anss! axew osle lnq 'sluawanoldw! aa!nlas az!le)!nal 0) aaueya ay; s,)! `ease ol)aw ay; uo auo eaynt).l— lowle3 1) le ' L snq aaueu!; pinom riluo lou ;I -)!sue.) ay; 1o,d za)egap sun u!axes)e s,)eyM x y 1 3 y) 0}awn Si 10; ;ley pue saemy2!11 ro; }ley 'lea% e -aui1 s 00Z4 ,epeau s)luauaa mom sl is aa� o� •au!lose2 0; xe; sales ley; ;uautp! S'9 s,ale!D o,aATAJfS of u nous TTSUI• IT p ayi Pualxa pinom ley;'PIa134a!13-'I,dO`e!P -leo eulmpg •da2;pue'lied -is-T4Q'sed -ded npues vas Aq palosuods Ial V■ a �_ TO auk do ..�alsnLu S.�olEjs aj urD :alV l ay) p 11"I` uo aq 11!m slesodo.d aalyi Weal 1V 'weld • ulpun; Hsuel)-AemaN a 10; 2ulysnd A anuquoP ll!m ria;) palea!pu! aney sJO; -els!2al cax Jo lagwnu e 'rila)eun).od p13dNbOQ N3A31S -ploy uo paaeld 2u!aq ale s1Pu)s!p 1!ayl • S1VIJI01Iag SS32Id 2I13\OId snluaw3 ueuL!e43 •11f 113Q4[23'H Q1IVN113$ sainleadpoliP3 6u!6eueyy bo•I•,7OQ N3}3 smaN/1ol!P3 6u!beueyy NVN1113-A IQNIy1J 1o11P3 abed!epol!P3 )IaV'1J.( (1'1VN023 luep!sald eo!A•JS/1O11P3 AciNnl)iUN IVM luep!seld/laysognd 11344123 •13 11313d £661. "i3 1-1021VW 'AVONOW Vtr OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 16, 1993 Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 7 : 00 PM with Cncl . Vierling, Lynch, Beard and Sweeney present . Also present : Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator; Karen Marty, City Attorney; Barry Stock, Asst . City Administrator; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; Dave Hutton, Public Works Director; and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk. Lynch/Sweeney moved to approve the agenda with the addition of 13b) Human Services Billing. Motion carried unanimously. Liaison reports were given by the Councilmembers. Mayor Laurent gave the Mayor' s report. Mayor Laurent asked for comments from anyone in the audience wishing to speak on any item not on the agenda. There was no response . The following items were added to the consent business : 8a) Jack Van Remortel regarding acquiring water from Savage, i'lb) Purchase of 1993 Dump Truck, and 13b) Billing Agreement . The following item was deleted from consent business : lie) Boy Scout Storage Space - Recreation Building. Lynch/Beard moved to approve the consent business as corrected. -� Motion carried unanimously. Lynch/Beard moved to allow the Backstretch R.V. Park and Campground to connect to the City of Savage water system provided that approval is granted by the City of Savage and further that the R.V. Park will discontinue operation no later than November 15, 1993 , and further that the water line be removed no later than December 15, 1993 . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Lynch/Beard moved to inform Mr. Van Remortel that he will be responsible for acquiring the necessary permits for this project and, if necessary, acquiring any easements for this project . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Mr. Ekola gave a presentation on the preliminary and final plat of Century Plaza Square 4th Addition lying south of 4th Avenue and west of Marschall Road. The City would like Mr. Link to dedicate 7 feet of land on the north side of the plat, along 4th Avenue for a right turn lane . Cletus Link, 1216 Jefferson Street, did not feel obligated to dedicate the 7 feet of land since his property would be the only property on the block to have to dedicate additional land. He stated this dedication may cause building set back problems . • Official Proceedings of the February 16 , 1993 Shakopee City Council Page -2- Mr. Ekola stated that the City may have to buy 7 feet for right of way from the other property owners to the west since they were not required to do this at the time of building their property. It was also mentioned that Mr. Link would not be losing any value on the property since it will not alter the development as originally planned. Mr. David Darryl, architect for the proposed construction on 4th Avenue, advised Council that they could live with the additional 7 foot dedication, that the proposed building would fit within the setback requirements . Jon Albinson suggested that Mr. Link grant a 7 foot drainage and roadway "easement" which would give the City what it needed to complete the proposed turn lane and the easement could then be included in the set back requirements . Sweeney/Vierling offered Resolution No. 3741, A Resolution Approving the Preliminary and Final Plat of Century Plaza Square 4th Addition, and moved its adoption. Lynch/Vierling moved to amend the Resolution by adding a sentence to condition 5 , stating prior to the recording of the final plat, a grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer. Motion carried unanimously. Motion carried unanimously as amended. Mayor Laurent opened the public hearing on the proposed improvements to Webster Street between 3rd and 6th by street construction and storm sewer at 8 : 05 PM. Mr. Hutton gave a presentation on the proposed improvements to Webster Street and explained the feasibility report . It was stated that a partial reason for this paving was for the Rahr Malting force main. Mr. Hutton stated there is sewer, water and storm sewer in this area and they should not need to be replaced. The estimated construction costs would be $41, 000 including a 10% contingency and 5% administrative fees . This project would be 100% assessed to the benefitted property owners . Mr. Hutton explained the methods of assessment . The estimated cost per lot owner would be $4, 100 . Judith Cox explained the payment options and the senior citizen deferment option for the audience. Ken Klehr, represented his mother, Mary Klehr, who lives at 924 West Fifth Avenue, stated that his mother was on a fixed income and could not afford the assessment fee. Mr. Klehr felt that noise and dust were not a problem since the street has little traffic. It was suggested that Council postpone this action. Official Proceedings of the February 16 , 1993page -3- Shakopee City Council Sue Weckman-Kreuser, represented her parents, Hubert and Evelyn, 938 West Fifth Avenue, felt this was an unnecessary improvement since no one has complained about the noise or dust . It was suggested that Rahr Malting pay for the improvements if that is the reason these improvements were being made . She stated that the majority being assessed are on limited incomes . Tom Greening, represented his mother, Mathilda Greening, informed Council that he agreed with the earlier comments and that this is not a needed improvement . Glen Graber, 919 Fifth Avenue West, stated that he would not like to see the improvements done because there are no problems with the street as it is now. Mayor Laurent closed the public hearing at 8 :45 PM. Mr. Hutton undergroundinformed force e beneath the driveable portion of put be built he street . Discussion ensued on whether to improve Webster Street now or wait until the land owned by the Women' s Correctional Facility, to the west, is developed. Beard/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3745, A Resolution Ordering an Improvement and the Preparation of Plans Project and Specificationso 1993-4, for or Wester Street, 6th Avenue to 3rd Avenue, moved its adoption. Motion failed unanimously. Mayor Laurent recessed the City Council meeting at 8 : 50 P.M. until 9 : 04 PM. Mr. Hutton gave a presentation on the proposed improvements to the alley between Market and Outlot A of Eastview Addition, and Minnesota and Dakota Streets from 7th North to the alley by street construction and storm sewer. The drainage problem along Minnesota and Dakota Streets is a severe problem and should be dealt with by paving. The estimated cost of the alley paving is $16, 600, the street construction is $31, 500 and storm sewer is $23 , 500 . The total project cost is about $71, 700 . The street and alley assessment is 100% to the property owners on both sides . However, Dakota Street will be 25% assessed since it is a reconstruction and storm sewer will be paid for out of the sewer fund. Mayor Laurent opened the public hearing at 9 :21 PM. Shirley Green, 905 East 7th Avenue, did not feel a ny that improvements then needed to be done to Dakota Street . Sugg estedrm sewers being put in on Minnesota Street would be helpful and, therefore, the paving of the alley would not be justified. 4 Official Proceedings of the February 16, 1993 Shakopee City Council Page -4- Tony Green, 905 East 7th Avenue, wanted to know what specific improvements were needed to Dakota Street and exactly why the alley needed to be paved. Mr. Hutton responded. Al Appenzeller, 837 East 7th Avenue, wanted to know where the storm sewer would be constructed. Mr. Hutton responded. Patricia Ploumen, 805 East 7th Avenue, was concerned how the paving of the alley would effect the driveways in the alley. She was also concerned whether the property value would be increased because of the paving of the alley. Mr. Hutton responded. Ann Zaun, 913 East 7th Avenue, did not feel the paving of the alley was necessary since it is a dead end alley. Jeane Myhro, 819 East 7th Avenue, was interested whether studies had been done to show the maintenance costs of this alley compared to other alleys in Shakopee . She also wondered whether there would be a traffic increase expected in the alley. LeRoy Menke, 1185 Shumway Street, felt he would not be obtaining any benefit from the alley, therefore, should not be assessed for it . Mr. Menke stated that he would be building a retaining wall between his development and the alley and would not have the benefit of using it . Mike Dixon, 813 7th Avenue East, was concerned about Dakota Street being built through and felt the new street would be opening up the alley for further traffic as a short cut from the new project . Mayor Laurent closed the public hearing at 9 : 50 PM. Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3746, A Resolution Ordering an Improvement and the Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Alley located between Market Street and Outlot A of Eastview Addition (Blocks 309, 314 and 317 of Wermerskirchen' s Addition) and Minnesota Street/Dakota Street from 7th Avenue North to the Alley, Project No. 1993-5 and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Ekola gave a presentation on the preliminary/final plat of Milwaukee Manor. He suggested deleting number 6 of the report, which requires reimbursement for a traffic analysis which has been paid. Staff also suggested changing from "prior to approval" to "prior to recording" for items 9, 10, 11 and 14 of the staff report . LeRoy Menke, 1185 Shumway Street, brought to Council' s attention some storm sewer and ditch concerns for his project . It was suggested that the City should pay for the improvements to the holding pond as far as the storm sewer was concerned. Mr. Menke also mentioned the City Public Works building being an eye sore and that it should be fixed up. Official Proceedings of the February 16, 1993 Shakopee City Council Page -5- Mr. Hutton commented that the pond has not functioned properly since it was built and, therefore, felt that it was up to the Council to decide if Mr. Menke should pay for the improvements or if the City should contribute some type of aid to the project . Council members felt this matter did not need to be addressed at this time and asked Mr. Menke to make a formal request at a later date. Beard/Vierling moved to offer Resolution No. 3742 with amendments suggested by Lindberg Ekola, A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Plat for Milwaukee Manor, and the Final Plat for Milwaukee Manor 1st Addition, and moved its approval . Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Ekola gave a presentation on the final plat of Valley Park 11th Addition submitted by Jon Albinson. Staff suggested to add the wording, prior to the recording of the final plat" in the resolution for items 5 and 6 . Also item 7 of the Planning Commission recommendations should be deleted since the NPDES permit was taken care of prior to the meeting. Mr. Ekola stated that the United States Army Corp of Engineers would like the developer to obtain permits from them to address their concern that this project would not effect the surrounding properties . Jon Albinson, Valley Green Business Park Limited Partnership, stated the request from the Army Corp of Engineers was a standard form letter for wetlands, and since no water is being displaced, a permit is not required. Mr. Albinson showed some concern as to the wording of number 3 of the resolution, which requires the developer to provide one site observation and compaction testing building pads by a registered professional soils engineer for the areas where native soils are displaced or where the building sites are filled. He stated that they are not preparing the building pads for an industrial site as would be done for a residential area. Vierling/Beard offered Resolution No. 3744, A Resolution Approving the Final Plat of Valley Park 11th Addition, with the deletion of condition number 3 regarding building compaction testing of building pads, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Lynch/Beard moved to approve the Board of Adjustment and Appeals Commission and the Shakopee Planning Commission 1992 Annual Reports . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Lynch/Beard moved to offer Resolution No. 3747, Rescinding Resolution No. 3123 and transferring the Duties and Responsibilities of the Community Youth Building Committee to the Shakopee Park and Recreation Advisory Board. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Mr. Hutton stated that if Council adopted the resolution ordering a report on improving McKenna Road, staff could continue to do a feasibility report . Official Proceedings of the February 16 , 1993 Shakopee City Council Page -6- Beard/Lynch moved to remove 11a) McKenna Road Upgrade from the table . Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Vierling offered Resolution No. 3748, A Resolution Ordering the Preparation of a Report on an Improvement to McKenna Road, From CR-16 to the South Corporate Limits, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Lynch/Beard moved to authorize the purchase of a 33 , 000 lb GVW single axle dump truck from North Star International in the amount of $47, 877 plus additional features in the amount of $1, 268 from Crysteel . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Lynch/Beard moved to transfer from the Capital Equipment Fund to the General Fund $464 , 617 . 32 for the purchase of equipment in 1992 . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Lynch/Beard moved to transfer all remaining assets for the Recreation Fund to the General Fund in order to close the former. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Lynch/Beard moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the agreement between ISD #720 and the City of Shakopee for the mutual conveyance of assets between the two bodies . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Beard/Vierling moved to direct staff to prepare a lease agreement with the Shakopee Boy Scouts for storage space in the former Recreation building at a rate of $1 . 00 per year with a 60 day cancellation provision. Motion carried with Cncl . Sweeney abstaining. Lynch/Beard moved to remove from the table the City Hall refuse container screening. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Lynch/Beard moved to direct staff to proceed with the indoor storage trash option for the New City Hall facility. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Lynch/Beard moved to approve bills in the amount of $506, 483 . 17 . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Lynch/Beard moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to submit an application and execute an agreement with Scott County for a Spring Recyclable Material Collection Day. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Cncl . Vierling wanted to get more information on the County Road 18 project . She stated that the County Road 21 option would cost approximately $7 . 5 million. Jon Albinson voiced concern about a possible delay to CR-21 turning into a four-lane road. He feels that if CR-18 were to be made into Official Proceedings of the February 16, 1993 Shakopee City Council Page -7- a four lane now, then the CR-21 reconstruction would be delayed. He feels that CR-18 from CR-16 to CR-42 should remain at two lanes . There is nice land in this area for residential development . He also believes that CR-21 is a necessary artery to serve the Dean' s Lake area. Cncl . Sweeney commented that the State Legislature, through Representative Orfield' s bill, will be eliminating the possibility of any additional housing availability in the Southwest suburbs and also a drive for low-income housing. It was suggested that Council direct the liaison to the County Board to encourage the County Board to move CR-21 to an urgent matter and construct the road as necessary. Cncl . Beard wanted to see some safety measures taken on CR-18, such as passing lanes, right hand turn lanes and some traffic lights . Jon Albinson advised Council to make a motion and present it to the County Board to show support of the previous position taken by Council . Joe Kelly, Eagle Creek Boulevard, agreed with Mr. Albinson that Council should reaffirm their earlier position. Lynch/Vierling moved to recommend to the Scott County Board of Commissioners that County Road 18 between County Road 16 and County Road 42 have a 2 lane cross section reaffirming the former action and position taken by Council . Motion carried with Cncl . Sweeney dissenting. Lynch/Beard moved to offer Resolution No. 3749, A Resolution Accepting Work on the Tahpah Park Sprinkler System, Project No. 1991-4 and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) The Council set a Committee of the Whole meeting for March 1, 1993 at 7 : 00 P.M. and March 23 , 1993 , at 8 :30 PM. Lynch/Beard moved to authorize the appropriate city officials to execute the billing agreement dated February 16, 1993 , from Scott County Human Services providing for payment of $52 . 00 a trip for transportation of detox persons to Dakota County Receiving Center in Hastings, Minnesota. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Mayor Laurent recessed the City Council meeting at 11 :23 PM for an executive session to discuss personnel issues, labor negotiations, land acquisitions and litigation. Mayor Laurent re-convened the meeting at 11 :25 P.M. and stated that the Council just came from an executive session where there was discussion involving personnel issues, labor negotiations, land acquisition, and litigation. Council took no action during the executive session. Official Proceedings of the February 16, 1993 Shakopee City Council Page -8- Vierling/Lynch moved to suspend Mr. Joe Honermann for 15 days as a result of an altercation between himself and his supervisor. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Vierling moved to suspend Mr. Harry Pass for one day as a result of allowing the unauthorized consumption of alcoholic beverages in a City building. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Vierling moved to suspend Mr. David Hutton for one day as a result of not exercising proper supervision. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent adjourned the meeting at 12 : 11 A.M. to Tuesday, March 2, 19 I 9 33 at 7 : 00 PM. ill (, 64(..-,J ith S. Cox y Clerk Debra Zabel Recording Secretary OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MARCH 2, 1993 Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 7 : 03 PM with Cncl . Vierling, Lynch, Beard and Sweeney present . Also present : Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator; Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator; Karen Marty, City Attorney; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; Dave Hutton, Public Works Director; and Judith S . Cox, City Clerk. Beard/Lynch moved to approve the agenda with the following additions : 15c)MauriceMnDOT ans Lightingnition;Contract5b)for Meeting169 bridge . With SPUC; andnd Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent recessed the City Council meeting for an H.R.A. meeting at 7 : 05 PM. Mayor Laurent reconvened the City Council meeting at 7 : 07 PM. Liaison reports were given by the Councilmembers . Mayor Laurent gave the Mayor' s report . the die Mayor Laurentasked itemcomments not onrom theanyone agenda. n Theruveas nno ce wishing to speak on any response. The following items fetter and 13k)dd to consent usiness : 13f)Disbursement High Pressure Sewerof City Funds . Vierling/Lynch moved to approve the consent business as corrected. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent opened the public hearing on the appeal by John Clark of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals decision to uphold a staff interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance regarding the use of a mobile home structure in the Racetrack Zoning District, Appeal Resolution No. CC-653 , at 7 : 18 PM. Mr. Ekola made a presentation and explained to Council that the area is zoned RTD and therefore the mobile home is not permitted on this property site . Mr. Ekola stated that Mr. Clark was unable to attend the meeting and had asked for this decision to be tabled until the next City Council meeting. Council members discussed directing Staff to look into rezoning the Racetrack District since the racetrack is no longer in operation. Mayor Laurent asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak on the appeal . There was no response. Mayor Laurent closed the public hearing at 7 :28 PM. Official Proceedings of the March 2, 1993 Shakopee City Council Page -2- Sweeney/Lynch moved to table the appeal by John Clark until Mr. Clark has the opportunity to be present . Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Lynch moved to direct Staff to initiate the process for rezoning the RTD to something else. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Lynch moved to approve the Shakopee Economic Development One Year and Three Year Work Plans . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Mr. Stock gave a presentation on the options for more 8-hour parking spaces in the Second Avenue parking lot . Mr. Kraft informed Council that the Marquette Bank would lease space to the City for approximately $15-20 per space monthly. Mr. Paul Schwaesdall, Pablo' s, wanted to see the parking left as it is currently because the summer traffic and tourism will generate more customers and he does not want to see the two hour parking spaces reduced. He stated that commuters are taking up the 8 hour spaces . Mr. Stock stated that Shakopee does have several park and ride lots for commuters and suggested publication of them so the public knows where they are . Mr. Bill Wermerskirschen, Bill' s Toggery, suggested making more 8- hour parking on the South side of Second Avenue . Greg Ries, Arnie' s Bar, was concerned with the City Hall parking lot taking up space for the City vehicles nights and weekends. Cncl . Beard suggested moving the City vehicles to the City garage to be stored at night and on weekends. Sweeney/Vierling moved that the City Administrator direct the parking of the City vehicles to the public works area evenings and weekends . Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Hutton explained why he would not like to have the City vehicles moved to the public works area. Sweeney/Vierling moved to designate the South side of Second Avenue as 8-hour parking from Sommerville to Fuller. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent thanked people for coming and for their comments. Official Proceedings of the March 2 , 1993 Shakopee City Council Page -3- Mr. Kraft suggested if Council wished to bond for an aerial truck that there could be a sale of equipment certificates without a referendum. Sweeney/Vierling moved to allow Shakopee Fire Department to publish and obtain bids for the purchase of an Aerial Platform Apparatus . Motion carried unanimously. Lynch/Beard moved to declare the 1975 aerial platform truck surplus property. Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Lynch moved to authorize the Fire Chief to submit a sealed bid, to Beatrice City, Nebraska to sell the 1975 aerial platform. [Truck to be sold as is, (no warranty) ladders are the only equipment to be on the truck. Bidder must present registered check for the truck at the time of transfer. Transfer to take place in Shakopee . ] Motion carried unanimously. Brad Larson, Scott County Engineer, updated the Council on the developments in the traffic volume in the area of County Trunk Highway 18, CR-16, and CR-42 that have occurred over the last couple of years . Mr. Larson gave a presentation on the past and future developments on the Bloomington Ferry Bridge and Highway 18 . Randy Gerdes, Consultant, Strager, Roscoe, Fausch, presented the projected figures for traffic volume for the year 2010 and also the noise impact for the roads involved. Mr. Gerdes suggested that in the year 2010 with CR-21 in place traffic would be expected to be 14-18, 000 trips per day and a range of 3-7, 000 on CR-18 . If CR-21 was not in place, CR-18 would be approximately 12-13 , 000 trips per day which would require a 4-lane road. Mr. Gerdes stated that a noise wall would not be effective along these roads and did not feel the 3 decibel noise increase would be discernable to the human ear and should not cause a problem. Discussion followed. Councilmembers didn' t see a need to reiterate their previous advisory position to the County Board. Council l recommended two lanes along CR-18 between CR-16 and CR-42 , bu recognizes that the County Board must make the decision on 2 lanes vs . 4 lanes for the good of the County. They are the decision making body. Mr. Hutton informed Council that the City of Shakopee has to approve all plans and specifications by resolution since these roads are located in Shakopee . Mr. Larson stated that CR-21 construction is not on the County' s five year plan. Official Proceedings of the ` March 2, 1993 Shakopee City Council Page -4- Joe Kelly, 8920 Eagle Creek Blvd, stated that he had noise evaluations done on his property and found that he did not exceed the night or daytime standards . He would like to see CR-21 built to a four-lane instead of CR-18 . John Mikkonen, 8673 McGuire Court, thought that CR-21 would be built to a four-lane only when the traffic increases required it . Mr. Hutton stated that if turn lanes would be put in on CR-18, this cost would be the City of Shakopee' s . Jon Albinson wanted Council to be aware of the limited benefits the construction of four lanes on CR-18 would have for Shakopee . He suggested also, that if CR-18 goes to a four-lane road to make it rural with no curb and gutter. No action was taken on the County Trunk Highway 18 Roadway Width Between CR-16 and CR-42 . Judy Cox informed Council that the additional information requested for the Shakopee VFW Post 4046 application for a premises permit had not been received. Sweeney/Lynch moved to table the application from the VFW for a premises permit . Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent recessed the City Council meeting at 9 : 10 PM until 9 :20 PM. Mr. Hutton stated the grader he would like authorization to advertise for bids would be used for grading alleys, ball fields, warning tracks and for blacktop purposes . Councilmembers suggested looking into hiring out for a bobcat, renting a unit from another city or public works department, leasing or buying a used grader. Vierling/Beard moved to direct Staff to look into renting, leasing or buying a used grader. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Lynch moved to authorize the advertisement for bids for a high pressure jetter as outlined in the specifications prepared by the Public Works Director. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3756 A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 3736 Adopting the 1993 Pay Plan, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Official Proceedings of the March 2, 1993 Shakopee City Council Page -5- Vierling/Lynch moved to appoint Vernice Takumi to the position of Accountant/Research Analyst at a starting salary of $29, 794 effective March 8, 1993 . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch moved to approve the applications and grant a Consumption and Display (Set Up) License to the Shakopee Ballroom and Banquet Center, 2400 East 4th Avenue; and the Fraternal Order of Eagles, 220 West 2nd Avenue . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Mr. Kraft stated that the City Attorney needed help for the prosecutorial cases, but they would have to come up with the money to hire someone. It was suggested hiring an in-house, half-time attorney which would cost approximately $15, 000 a year or contract with the Scott County Joint Prosecution Association. Mr. Kraft stated there was $10, 000 in the budget for a part time secretary. Sweeney/Lynch moved to authorize the City Administrator to contact Scott County and proceed with the hiring of a half-time attorney. Motion carried unanimously. Ms . Marty stated that Holmes and Graven submitted a proposal to revise the zoning ordinance for a cap of $6, 000 and Larkin, Hoffman is proposing to do the work for a cap of $7-15, 000 plus disbursements . Sweeney/Vierling moved to accept the proposal submitted by Ron Batty of Holmes & Graven, Chartered. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Lynch moved to direct staff to contact the League of Cities to convey the City of Shakopee' s support for the proposed enabling legislation allowing city staff to pay certain claims without presenting them to the Council for audit . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch moved to approve bills in the amount of $251, 105 . 51 . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch moved to approve Resolution No. 3751, to increasing the Shakopee Fire Department man power by 3 . To give the department total membership of 38 . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3752, A Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications for T.H. 101/169, State Project No. 7005- 60 (101=187) within the City of Shakopee and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Mr. Hutton gave a presentation on the feasibility reports prepared for Atwood, Fillmore, Naumkeag, Spencer Streets, and 4th and 8th Avenue . It was also stated there would need to be public hearings Official Proceedings of the March 2 , 1993 Shakopee City Council Page -6- for all of these improvements before reconstruction was started, and all the improvements are 25o assessed. Cncl . Sweeney suggested to drop the improvements of 8th Avenue, Atwood to Spencer Street at this time. Vierling/Beard offered Resolution No. 3753, A Resolution Receiving a Report and Calling for a Hearing on the 1993 Street Reconstruction Projects, Project No. 1993-7, and to have the public hearing March 30th, 1993 starting at 7 : 00 PM, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Lynch moved to offer Resolution No. 3754, A Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications for Stage 3 of the Bloomington Ferry Bridge/County State Aid Highway. 18 Project, County Project No. S . P. 70-618-27 and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch moved to adopt Resolution No. 3755, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Releasing Lot 1, Block 1, Halo Second Addition from the development agreements Relating to the Shakopee Valley Square Planned Unit Development, and clarifying that Resolution No. 3207 does not Apply to Lot 1, Block 1. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3750, A Resolution Apportioning Assessments Among New Parcels Created as a Result of the Platting of the meadows 8th Addition, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3743 , A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Approving a Premises Permit for the Lions Club of Shakopee, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch moved to offer Resolution No. 3758, A Resolution in Honor of the 85th Birthday of Mr. Maurice Stans, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Council decided to put the downtown underground utility discussion on the 16th of March agenda and submit the funding to SPUC for review. Vierling/Lynch moved to offer Resolution No. 3759, Approving Agreement with MnDOT for Lighting Along the Mini Bypass, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent recessed the meeting for an Executive Session to discuss litigation and property acquisition, at 10 : 18 p.m. Official Proceedings of the March 2 , 1993 Shakopee City Council Page -7- Mayor Laurent re-convened the meeting at 10 :33 p.m. No action was taken by the City Council during the Executive Session. Mayor Laurent adjourned the City Council meeting to March 16 , 1993 at 7 : 00 PM. The meeting adjourned at 10 :34 p.m. . tkialdc) tth S. Cox y Clerk Debra Zabel Recording Secretary /Da) MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner RE: Appeal the Decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals - Mr. John Clark DATE: March 5, 1993 INTRODUCTION: The Board of Adjustment and Appeals has reviewed an application for an Appeal of an Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance submitted by Mr. John Clark. Mr. Clark is appealing the interpretation of Section 11. 05, Subd. 8, which regulates mobile homes. At their February 4th meeting, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals moved to uphold the interpretation of the City Administrator and informed the applicant that the mobile home structure must be removed from the site by June 15, 1993 . Mr. Clark appealed the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals to the City Council. The City Council held the public hearing regarding this appeal at their March 3 , 1993 , meeting. The City Council tabled making a decision on the appeal by Mr. Clark until he could be present. Staff has contacted the applicant and he has stated that he can be present at the March 16, 1993 City Council meeting. BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of the staff report dated February 24, 1993 regarding this appeal. Please refer to the staff report for the Background and Discussion. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Uphold the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals and affirm the interpretation of the City Administrator, requiring the applicant to remove the mobile home structure from the site by June 15, 1993 . 2 . Interpret the City Code so as to allow mobile home structures to be used for storage facilities within the RTD. 3 . Continue the public hearing to allow the applicant or staff to provide additional information. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS RECOMMENDATION: The Board of Adjustment and Appeals recommends Alternative No. 1, to uphold the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals and affirm the interpretation of the City Administrator, requiring the applicant to remove the mobile home structure from the site by June 15, 1993 , for the following reasons: 1. The subject site is located within the Racetrack Zoning District (RTD) . The approval of this appeal would permit mobile home structures to be used as storage structures within the RTD. 2 . Section 11. 36, Racetrack District (RTD) regulations, does not list mobile home structures as either a Permitted nor a Conditional Use within this Zoning District. 3 . Section 11. 05, Subd. 8 states that mobile home structures are permitted as a Conditional Use within the Agricultural and Rural Residential Zoning Districts only. 4 . State Statute 16.B. 60 defines agricultural buildings as structures designed, constructed and used to house agricultural items. The mobile home structure was not designed and constructed to house agricultural items. If the applicant wishes to design and construct an agricultural building, staff would suggest that the applicant apply for the Administrative Waiver from the PUD approval process and submit a site plan verifying compliance with the ordinance requirements. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Appeal Resolution No. CC-653 , A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, which states that the City Council upholds the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, and affirms the City Administrator's interpretation of Section 11. 05, Subd. 8, that mobile home structures are permitted as a Conditional Use within the Agricultural and Rural Residential Zoning Districts only, that are not permitted within the RTD for use as storage structures, and that a mobile home structure does not meet the definition of an agricultural building as defined in State Statute 16B. 60, and move its adoption. APPEAL RESOLUTION NO. CC-653 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA. WHEREAS, Mr. John Clark, applicant, and Mr. Eugene Hauer, owner, have filed an application dated December 3 , 1992, for an Appeal to the Decision of the City Administrator under the provisions of Chapter 11, Land Use Regulation (Zoning) , of the Shakopee City Code, Section 11.04 , Subd. 4; and WHEREAS, the applicant is appealing the City Administrator's interpretation of Section 11.05, Subd. 8, Mobile Homes, which states the following: Mobile homes shall be regulated by Section 4 . 60 of the City Code (Mobile Home Park Regulations) , except that mobile homes shall be a conditional use in the "A-1" and "R-1" Districts for agricultural purposes if they meet the following standards: A. Property must be being used as an agricultural use. B. Mobile home may not be the only occupied residential structure on the property. C. The persons living in the mobile home must be related to the farm operator and must work on that farm. D. The mobile home may be placed on the property for one 5 year term and the permit may be reissued for additional 5 year term or terms at the discretion of the Planning Commission. E. The conditional use must be reviewed on an annual basis; and WHEREAS, the present zoning for the parcel on which the Appeal is being requested is designed as Racetrack District (RTD) ; and WHEREAS, the applicant is appealing the interpretation of Section 11. 05, Subd. 8 to allow mobile homes to be used as storage structures within the Racetrack District (RTD) ; and WHEREAS, the property upon which the request is being made is legally described as: Section 8, Township 115, Range 22 , 1. 6 Acres in the North 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4; and WHEREAS, notice was provided and on January 7, 1993 , the Board of Adjustment and Appeals conducted a public hearing regarding this appeal, at which time it heard from the City Planner and invited members of the public to comment; and WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals continued this public hearing to their February 4, 1993 , meeting, at which time it heard additional comments from the City Planner and invited members of the public to comment; and WHEREAS, upon hearing the advice and recommendation of the City Planner and upon considering the suggestions and objections raised in a public hearing duly held thereon; and WHEREAS, the aforementioned application for an Appeal to the Decision of the City Administrator to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals was denied for the following reasons: 1. The subject site is located within the Racetrack Zoning District (RTD) . The approval of this appeal would permit mobile home structures to be used as storage structures within the RTD. 2 . Section 11.36, Racetrack District (RTD) regulations, does not list mobile home structures as either a Permitted nor a Conditional Use within this Zoning District. 3 . Section 11.05, Subd. 8 states that mobile home structures are permitted as a Conditional Use within the Agricultural and Rural Residential Zoning Districts only. 4. State Statute 16.B. 60 defines agricultural buildings as structures designed, constructed and used to house agricultural items. The mobile home structure was not designed and constructed to house agricultural items. WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals allowed the applicant until June 15, 1993, to remove the mobile home structure from the site; and WHEREAS, Mr. John Clark, applicant, and Mr. Eugene Hauer, owner, have filed an application dated February 11, 1993 , for an Appeal of the Decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals under the provisions of Chapter 11, Land Use Regulation (Zoning) , of the Shakopee City Code, Section 11.04, Subd. 4. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, as follows: That the City Council upholds the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, and affirms the City Administrator's interpretation of Section 11. 05, Subd. 8, to not allow mobile homes to be used as storage structures within the Racetrack District (RTD) . Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 19 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner RE: Appeal the Decision of the City Administrator - Mr. John Clark DATE: February 24 , 1993 INTRODUCTION: The Board of Adjustment and Appeals has reviewed an application for an Appeal of an Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance submitted by Mr. John Clark. Mr. Clark is appealing the interpretation of Section 11. 05, Subd. 8, which regulates mobile homes. At February 4th meeting, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals moved to uphold the interpretation of the City Administrator and informed the applicant that the mobile home structure must be removed from the site by June 15, 1993 . BACKGROUND: The applicant moved a mobile home structure onto his place of residence at 2100 Eagle Creek Boulevard. He is renting the farm building site from Mr. Eugene Hauer. The subject site is 1. 6 acres in size. It is located within the Racetrack District (RTD) and within the Mandatory Planned Unit Development (PUD) area. (See Exhibit A. ) The site is currently being used for agricultural purposes. Agriculture is a non-conforming use of the land within the RTD. A non-conforming use is defined in Section 11. 02 as, "Any use of land, buildings, or structures lawfully existing on the effective date of this Chapter which does not comply with all the regulations of this Chapter or any amendments hereto governing the zoning district in which such use is located" . The structure was brought to staff's attention by Shakopee Public Utilities (SPUC) . The applicant had requested that electrical service be provided to the structure, and SPUC questioned whether the mobile home structure had received an approved Building Permit. Staff determined that a Building Permit had not been approved for the structure, and a letter was written to the applicant on November 25, 1992, informing him that permits are required to move in or construct any building within the City of Shakopee. After becoming informed that building permits are required, the applicant submitted an Application for a Building Permit for the mobile home structure, and indicated that it would be used as a "storage trailer" , and not as living quarters. The applicant informed staff that this structure was intended to be used as a storage structure for seed and small tractor parts. On December 1, 1992, another letter was written to the applicant stating that the Zoning Ordinance does not permit mobile home structures within the RTD. The applicant submitted an application to appeal staff's interpretation of Section 11. 05, Subd. 8 of the City Code. DISCUSSION: Staff conducted a site inspection on January 20, 1993 . The subject site is currently being utilized for agricultural uses. Exhibit A illustrates the property ownership pattern and zoning. Exhibit B is a copy of a letter from Mr. Clark. Copies of photographs of both the interior and exterior of the mobile home structure have been attached to this staff report. (Exhibit C. ) Many of these photographs were taken from C.R. 16 so that the Board of Adjustment and Appeals could see the visibility of the structure from this road. A number of residential homes are located along the bluff to the south of C.R. 16. The mobile home structure that is under discussion measures 12 ' by 60' in size, and was manufactured in 1981. It has steps and a deck leading to the entrance door. There are no kitchen or bath facilities, and there is no plumbing connected to the structure. A furnace is attached to the exterior of the structure. However, it was not operating during the site inspection. State Statute 16B. 60, Definitions, State Building Code, which was adopted by reference by the City of Shakopee, defines an agricultural building as the following: "a structure on agricultural land as defined in section 273 . 13 , subd. 23 , designed, constructed, and used to house farm implements, livestock, or agricultural produce or products used by the owner, lessee, and sublessee of the building and members of their immediate families, their employees, and persons engaged in the pickup or delivery of agricultural produce or products" . Mobile homes were not originally "designed and constructed to house farm implements" . They were designed and constructed for residential use. Based on the State's definition of an agricultural building it is staff's opinion that the subject structure does not appear to meet the definition in that it was not designed and constructed to house farm implements, livestock or products. The structure is only being used to house agricultural items. Therefore, the mobile home structure should be removed from the site. The applicant is in need of additional tool and equipment storage space. Currently there are several agricultural buildings on the site which have been designed and constructed to house agricultural items. The PUD ordinance allows the construction of agricultural structures in the RTD. Section 11. 40, Subd. 7 . C, Administrative Waiver, states that the City Administrator has the discretion to waive the Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval process for adoption of a PUD when the following condition is met: "1. Properties Located within a Mandatory PUD Area. Properties which have not previously gone through the PUD platting process will not be required to submit a PUD when it functions as an existing agricultural operation or when the following conditions are met: (a) The changes in the building location or size do not affect more than 10% of the site area and/or floor space. (b) The changes in landscaping, parking, and drive arrangement, or site improvements do not affect more than 10% of the site area. (c) The changes comply with all requirements placed on the zone in which the property is located. If the applicant were to obtain an Administrative Waiver from the City Administrator, he may be able to obtain a building permit to construct an accessory structure for agricultural storage purposes. However, this waiver could not provide approval to move a mobile home structure into the RTD. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Uphold the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals and affirm the interpretation of the City Administrator, requiring the applicant to remove the mobile home structure from the site by June 15, 1993 . 2 . Interpret the City Code so as to allow mobile home structures to be used for storage facilities within the RTD. 3 . Continue the public hearing to allow the applicant or staff to provide additional information. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS RECOMMENDATION: The Board of Adjustment and Appeals recommends Alternative No. 1, to uphold the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals and affirm the interpretation of the City Administrator, requiring the applicant to remove the mobile home structure from the site by June 15, 1993 , for the following reasons: 1. The subject site is located within the Racetrack Zoning District (RTD) . The approval of this appeal would permit mobile home structures to be used as storage structures within the RTD. 2 . Section 11. 36, Racetrack District (RTD) regulations, does not list mobile home structures as either a Permitted nor a Conditional Use within this Zoning District. 3 . Section 11. 05, Subd. 8 states that mobile home structures are permitted as a Conditional Use within the Agricultural and Rural Residential Zoning Districts only. 4 . State Statute 16 .B. 60 defines agricultural buildings as structures designed, constructed and used to house agricultural items. The mobile home structure was not designed and constructed to house agricultural items. If the applicant wishes to design and construct an agricultural building, staff would suggest that the applicant apply for the Administrative Waiver from the PUD approval process and submit a site plan verifying compliance with the ordinance requirements. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Appeal Resolution No. CC-653 , A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, which states that the City Council upholds the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, and affirms the City Administrator's interpretation of Section 11. 05, Subd. 8 , that mobile home structures are permitted as a Conditional Use within the Agricultural and Rural Residential Zoning Districts only, that are not permitted within the RTD for use as storage structures, and that a mobile home structure does not meet the definition of an agricultural building as defined in State Statute 16B. 60, and move its adoption. EXHIBIT A . ._ ..: . . . - 4M.M10.41111...M•MM• • .• S. •11.4.M.1 saL•as.a.m..4..11AMMAIILAIL11•111=1.ISSI,.. ..••.'.. •..... .•....•...•...44'.1 --r- 1 ! I •___ ___.... • • • , - - • • . • i • - • i . • , 6111•11=111=14•01101111 . . R4 :. . .. , .. • . •• . . . _ _______. - . RTD i , ..: . ., ., . . , ,....4„, ill. 41,.. • : .. . 47 :-..s."'"2.:%• .. ; : , . Ili i c 7 1,-•-rf:71- -..., ..... __--------1- , - . .. •\...!:- ------,-. .i.7.-- -.--•-;.---, : !--...-.4,,,. • I --- .---, ! , • , ----..`%. • i __. , ....L.NL. • . ...._ ... . I ! :-..,...... ---r•c2,,,,, /--,..,‘1 -,,,'74.1/4,... • I .t :.... _!•11 ',.1.4_1_,„.`)......,:N.,.. />,,, ''''-....4%.• - , ---, - ,---r".. .v-' : . •c. r A • / .---,..'Ie. ::--,17..:-: ,NfiA _ • -AU 1 ___L:1 L j, 1-.-Ny yN, r'.--4/ ' .. .• . -,.. .... ----.- r- 21' ---; -, ..<- ...--• •.,,,-.;'•i -7•,,:%. ,..- iL.--4 4- SUBJECT SITE !,;.• .< • . . . , -,„•••• .......?:.....,F,.. ....;t: ---'•--Z' ;---4.-- 1- il 1---4-::- \\( 1/41j '''-..:. • • ' -- %. •.:::%':?:?••ir's•:.,.... _ r _ -7. •7,.'": .', . •;', ''.•,-*3-,-, -.-1-7-1 r-.---i-.3 1---.---I 21\_t-1-;,i,,,k--...tgA.-:•••‘, -- -- ----- ... : .... .. r • • r f"- ..4 . .- - AG AGRICULTURE \\, .. • ......-:7,4,.; ....,, , .., 44%. .‘..‘:•--:',. . aaaA -\\ .- ;4 ./.-.... < i f .' '----- ... . .....• , 2.--, .... .• - . ; a "•.. •-•.... • R 1 RURAL RESIDENTIAL :7.--T\ ,-‘,;;-;‘,..,_(( \ \ N...4.-..i,, ! 1 R2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL -• • ..•--... •--,,, , i...--,...,.7-"..--,...:7-..i i : • --,.. • i --.) 4. :7:\ or", ,-:.1 i•.*-----:::-:::?:\.t.k i •',1-;:-.-;72:4:-_--.. / / ..)---,... • :::: ;•••.,..,,.. R3 MID-DENSITY RES. .1:-,-- ,,.... /:-...-.?..- , -;.,..4,,,.;:t:::--r T-7-..i ii 1‹:,--t. / 'P'i '';i '''..,,4*•.,. •3 1.4: ' ..,f, ,--,- .. i : :,..-,.. . .r•'. "I .' t • ',": , R4 MULTI FAMILY RES. •:, .• .x;if. tli.k.-A......1.. 1 J. 7.....,..:1/4•"---;7-. ;-,...MI -03'\..t.?,\' N?'„----r-- -e*,d,•,.... • -- *••! LI dr.- NA-nr. ,...7— ....,1 ! ----- I -:-----“--"\-- - - ••• ,• / v...R.,.$ B 1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS --,---•---• ?-- -,-;...4, ' . .Z '3 ' t 1 46.7 i i .%.. ' ;• L--.....:..--e 1. —..' . , `4,,!-....r;..... . . . - . • • B2 COMMUNITY BUSINESS -------'":77 171 : , ' - -'--*4---1N-ing, I . .. , B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS -----;"--r—i ....! 14 t ri,,J 1—L....i -7_.1 " : • --- , k- ..-• ... f---1.---s , 1-• i i•24"-' 3 • '''. %-•:--f-"••••• .1 . ..•.....,.., .....„ 1 ''; 12;ki:121..4'—L I ,4j I y1/4\t•-4 _,,. ..„. .... / • I 1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL •--1 1---r-7 i-ITTTI • 1'.-- l'-.L.•-:- ----- ! ......-- ; 7:1 .1 k--1--J' aivt..1 , 12 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL -•:••• ,.,E1V- . S SHORELAND 1 -- -- _ _ - - - - .... - -- FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT, - -- _ . • _ ..1. _ i , I . .....•_. - - _ ____ _ --.. MANDATORY PUD _ -- , _. .- RTD RACETRACK DISTRICT- - -- _ • , . ._ - Zoning Map City of SHAKOPEE _ . . . . .. .. • • • .. . _ , . . . .. .. .„ .. ... , ._: . EXHIBIT B a(%)-1 ritv A Z-1 gitt • / 6 . iN.e a • , , o • • • a, AV/Lbc-i „ 1-1,er-(1 -176 , , , azidiv-z • av,„„ , v d - • /\ / 0 EXHIBIT C 2100 EAGLE CREEK BOULEVARD Photographs taken Jan. 20, 1993, by Fulton Schleisman, Bldg Official . -- --: ..r.,,,q-... _.. . ..,..-,: : -----, --,---- ...: -, .... -....; ... . — .,. . „ -. • • • • . _. - . .0 •. •.: ---- 41.1 • --...r4.vt.li•all; .i ... lar44.4%I' : -e(1..Vil*IA% ' ' IP?' • • ' * -----...ift."4. -t ...- ,,1 .. ... . . - . ...,_. - „••• ''.„4 ';::-A,2,.`- • . :rif s SC{ .44.-.- - - 4....z......_,.., ..-.!. % . _. . ..,.. ..-i,..- - -,- • ' - V' . . ,.,-,.. .**17•2!! • N. ,%TA, - ; .-1 ,,...fri•tre-v... r,...t"-•-•-, . •-,-__ . ''' '''.- - '4' ..* t ir148/• p.,.,...i,!.4.,4vv .. . .... . , , '.4. -, :.-k • •., '• -- •.V- •, , ,....;, •. .• 1 .-!,• Jo If. . ,:. -.. -,., --- . --1 ' -' t '•'1•• '' ,- -• .... II. ts .-7—v,:•-. t I:..• ,.,...:.- 't 0....,.... t 4.'"?. a,_ , •,,,,,,4 , I.- I r •dilor . ,_ . . .• - J • • "41" 4ir- - . • - • e--.-i - . ,,,. .1b..-A. • I.-1 . ., ,.• 4- ,•1,,t . ,.•\ . •_i_ .•'i. '. . .20 -0. :-:%.' •NiVitze-41.V.744;v0 .• ;•-.7' -41i',".•..,,e14.1 i -...4.4%..,,,, 4. 4..f?:‘,.1 • . "an-.01.=..,-......,,, . .3... . -?S.M.Ik‘..&16,'IS.r..4 . .:-.i....r• ",‘,.411*.,' , •-- •-• ft,-INV 01,- NI ... .11.f4 /..Y.., ,,i7,,,m0. 1 . . _ . .• -1.-:.-s' 4 (,,, , -- - t.,-1,...,:-,,,T,:a.„.. , .1. . 4‘...',- .....,:, ._ .‘ 1( ' . .., .; , ' '.'4'7,......ik'. ...,.m.• — s .-•„,,, - 1.4.---„ rts.:„.. tc.„.-, ....-.. ; -., ,,,, , ,, ,,. . • -.. • , ... .- .,...:.:, ,!..., .,-.:.•%. ,I$is..,4„-,....„. ,a,..... .. . , •_---._..k. ; aa,... .- = ti . ,.,A, 6...t....4 't' •, ,.. !e.r. 'ilk A. 111 'F. :t itiolFt"::• 'Ie . • -4...1 .:1,„ • 4%1;.1, - •,, , -* •11 7*•..;;,••• .-.'..• j, '...+. 1, -- -........,• • • I• . . • ,,•-•"' ' '11110.f'-'. . -.. '. '''' -1,A461 4 ...:. 1 .f. .:•,..,..c ._ ... , . ...... ,. . •....., ---4'. — • -,... -9',7 :-.1, . . . .. . _. ,. •• - • :,,.... • -:. •• ..._ i .• __. • . .. , • ..... .. ....,, A.-_._ ' . .. ,...,.. IA '1'1 fli IT,/.fr _ ----a...---wim ..k.,r__:... .;-•-,..t.A.-:-•:-•:- '--:-'.,- - - - . • _ - - - - . •••_., ,• , , . _.•_._ . _-• •._ :,..... 4%, :4. . -•-, . __ __ ..--- . . . _ ''')---•t\11%._.1 \,, if,: •.,..va- -,..,: .\•.-•%NN ..._'.,,- •••441;, _ •.:. ,../,_.---,-i,,jcp-r._-_-,•...i,...,i.. -, ‘ 0 ... r IS& gAit•-34,4,-, • .4,1t,,,t . . 46 • ,-- „. .,..... •-_.N.-.110k .i i 4. --1-. AA*• 44.. •VP(80.: <,......---- , ...-.;....\:sill,AL.,•i•...r.-.. ;14iff 4.. .4r.%, . - 1..4. -,--i. . ..: nn . •-.`,41:114‘\‘‘, - ,k...:.. ,.:4-:A' : :- 4 rz -- - . At 1 ••;e••,p:,IC•43.; • • • -:;••••• - . ___ - ,• ---0,- — % i,.".. -..-- - ,, a - • • , 4,..- - -- -- ' - 111 i •.. •• •-• ---..'-•ri..r'.o..•.'':i0i..:.C%...4%• ' A. .,i. r..g..,-.,li kie..,,--...,,....:•,.:-•1k'i..7je.?14i:.;.0it0.t0..A_r8.,1.s.'.I'$I.x.1•.•'.,.,1.;-,.tv.,..,I.;•l...,.,t.'-A'P.-,j....-9i;.,1.:. 'i.,1I' ' l6----;1 • '. . . . . - _, ‘r3 IA . A4 - . ... -__.._g.'•.4,. ,...-4,•..'..:. 1..6._. •.. •• ;. - -g. . .., .„,,.... ..........._\ . . -447,1-, _•••••,;....-_,--, - = .• ' . . .. . . . .., • -,, ... 1 - \ * - • • - - --,==.04-. , . -.. • . __ 1 _._ ;---"' _ • i • _ - . , . _ ..•:i _ --- -. -- .;cit•-;5., _"•,, .,.....„. . • , -_ '7.4---'".. "."•7:''''7.1P---.7';' .;*".-_-``,7'-'-'7''' 1:-.-.. - .::: -'''-::- -zAativ:i-,..=•-:A.,=.:.....:...-..x...v--....--....-7.-..:.....n.,....:-..z.--- -.,4sact.,....z.Aa.....g....-..;.14,??.....,..H--.,--. ._L.-... ,.. , .. • • ,. k.2.:4;.,.,......,.......,,.,:.,......„ • ,, .ion !....''¢'” 0 .. • 4 �6 * .•, • • .4:4141".4,44E 1" , `- _—y•�i ^*.!...�,+ i••,x .44 %� `` -�•fi . • - 1(1 4-1` v.-0 6" X7,1 `y.-i ' <.',\ - 1. �. ,_ , - ; . ,i - 4S • 1 .- _ _ .4.-'4474.1"' i. .17.3::•:. ---' • '.".'.. . . _ i ".. • . ..tiir- - _ - -. ..... .... ..z .... ... - Ili.. . : , - . - a y j A ' ;:y 2 ••,-a• ~_ ♦Y •. = �=_tea yC• i..'IyV M _ _-� .,. ,. . .I . _ . .... _, ____ „.6.„.4 ... _ __ _. et, . _ ... _. . . _ _ __. ____ _ _1,7„.:.......i.„..Ii.......„..,...,?....z........ .:.:„.:,..,..,.....,_ _____,.. . . i' •.• - 1-'_ • - . . _ . r . 11,.......:._____: ,...,.. _.1.....,...... .... ..7,..,...=._:,.L....,.........;....._: ..L._...„...,:„...,:.,:: � i " - --- - -:rte R -- - �'1 r• 2-1,--1. •— ___ • . f • I . , i. , ..... 4i ' _-...--....„,....i...k:: \ , . ,, -:2:154t.;1.:,.'1./i 6r4;k411°;.'11 • • ..s..sma,a: Ie wo _ ... ,.... . NI .... , . ._....,,4„. .,._ . . 4. • •la; • V 'I. i • ig.( . .,., ._ . :: '..1, c -:. , .•.•: ...... -3,-..--......::,,,It.,:, b_......... ...„.7-: 3.1., —.It- •:-,. - Ar..- rt.... - .. It. 1:.; •. : -...,-:,'.-4M '1 rZir---41 to. • I • Xia_i ' 1 . . ,...--1,-....,7W . ':::;i3it-'0,-ft 4 ._ • . i. - 4-. e,..:• I '. ''....----7......ii V........- a. 4 t. TV 7....e.:::... -411 ..- - Mb.- . .........0440; ... _ - ---. -_- _ ).....,_ _:,...........,„—..,-,....-- — . -- • • , ..,. . •....r.,.._.:. --.--..*----"----.---- — 1. T:li`• . A - - 1 ---: = . ,- — 1 - ---;--- .-.:1 ,a1 - • tlf. ti 1. . • !..,--., ..:!, i - ..A.- :4- - • 'I O =._',•"-F--....‘„..). .-...;.. - .. i , ..--'..., ...., : 4' ' - -'rel ..,__ ofti ... 47 P . _ 4;- ----.._-__-__-_-,-.-.--- t'' .,-,''1 im. IWO •:f7,ii,W. iii 4. ---4 -- ,• --..% -- •, '' 4. L ' '• ' .-1-1'.--- 1 r 1.-... -'' , •''' „......• . . 1 :.i. ..Z ._ . . ., . . ...-tel . ,.. , ________....-; •^" ----"r -; _ . . . 7 .'44'tC,:'l-t-1:"..‘i i .itt ''',.:1 "; '- • . l. 1,,, 1 .‘,..?'- r. % .. • 7-7"-- : % i i ' I 1 ;- A '''.: • -1 15 ---- - i ..... • -_ .. .,i -..1p... f..f c: 4... . .. ... • __ . _ . _ ._ . _ -- -t- -tivr-----..., ., . . •.: .-- _ ., -..-.-., -.- .:- ----, , , --, -..... 4,- --- ,, •..,_...w, ,r . ' ' ',1 '..- 1. •4- 1-* V-. . .,,... _T. 1.,,..`"I'ir•C I I___ —, -••••• , - iit-- i.".4 - -- -•li .•-r*. - ' ' . • ‘'- _ .„,,,A• ....... , •i [ -. _ , _f :.,i k •-2.,...-' - ;•1" t i _,., • i-.•••-f. _ . - - . • . . -'1.--••••,,••..". I . - •'. . i - \ I .....-:. ,•••••••'••=-..-- • --. - I -i 1 : 1 ,.1---....z•::. ' - :- - ' :-...-- -••••.. . _,_. "--;L. "'=•-.;-_.•-•,----''''•ft.--=.1-'1,-- - '• -- I , .... • .. - i.7_--•,•..- --. • --••-- .- • tr,t-t-.'---,-,----T.'- -- . •-•,,,e---- -,.__,..:..- . . ,..,..• • , _. C E•16 ' - - ' . -,•_:.iiiir" .-.• • p-::::, k''_ . •c..47-4.'4i '...••• ••,:, I -•-••.45i5,31*-- . , . r.-• t •••..: • - _ . - . .........., • . f ti :1 : Lis.--... , : -- . I. L...'i__. 1. . . • - 3 F: • A:,--- • I . • . ......!. ;,,•:. I -. • _ ••-ZliC • .- k..- % '-e-*P-:'' - ,...-- ' ••• . 41...a., -;- .: , ...:1—. • • "2 • ..1. -'0 -•-•• .. . ___ , ... -_- _ . I I -i . . . . . • --• . ril , I I t •-7,----4 ---.' .• ... --.:, .._ .. ••,. .. Zr .._ 1 . ... - •IA-1 - - --7:-i. •: . . i . '''' 1 , • W.7.7 ......• j .., . . . ' i . - . - I I tt ...._ ..... • 01.....4.j''. •,...., ..i. _LE-0:4 ' I ..x ifi-r:s ,,.., • s .. ..• . „ L - -0 ' -- - !. - . .. . -, ,...). _ •- ......,, ,........... , 4 • . • .._ . , t 1 • t !• , . . ,,,,,....„.„•„„-„4. 14-.•''',..... A- IL 4..,,I ,5 ' • - ,. • IF .3 . ft,47^ _ .._ 4 • i.0 ---,:!.---• 1 P .,- 1.:._,..-L___. .,;-,L - - • -_ ; . . - . — ;. . ...._ - .,......... . ,.,i _. • , - _ _ .. . . — ' # ## .• ! ; 11 ...,-... - 4t,...-A ii. i W• ., .. ... . . . . . . . . _ . . . , . . – ... 4161; 411":11 , • . _ ..._. — _ _ .. ... , . .. . .. / • - III' • -. - . . . - ., .. •_••••,......1:-':.', ,...•.,-- . . . . ... , . . . •••[ .--,-- . . • t.i•-••••••:::- • (I- ” :•ft " 1- - • . _ „. . • .•i ..;: , ll'_ 1.v..4 4., .,, ,.....,---,,,, - II . . . . . .. . ...... __ immic, ::,; . _, :...; i _ _ ,z: . ._ - - ---.,-- .. j'S.” ,s• . .:mer:z.iir a ITTergifF• 1 1 - '-' A i . ^..•?M`:"... .--- •I 'Ill% -', ..,.. ..--....--.... I 1 ‘ -- t. ... 1 fir I. • 4111, • ilr -:-.-.. i .. ai- .' . •;:-:-.-- Alig",71 • 7. .."1150,2 . - • lb- - r- - . _ • . --- . - _ . .._ ._ . . TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ.REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MARCH 16, 1993 LOCATION: New City Hall, 129 Holmes Street South Mayor Gary Laurent presiding 1) Roll Call at 7: 00 P.M. 2] Approval of Agenda 3] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 4] Mayor's Report 5) RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS 6) Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. ) *7) Approval of Minutes of February 16th, and March 2nd, 1993 8] Communications: None 9] Public Hearings: None 10] Boards and Commissions: Planning Commission: a] Appeal by John Clark of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals decision to uphold a staff interpretation of the zoning ordinance regarding the use of a mobile home structure in the Racetrack Zoning District, Appeal Resolution No. CC-653 - tabled March 2nd b] Rezoning Request from St. Francis Regional Medical Center - Ord. No. 353 Park and Recreation Advisory Board: *c] New Playground Equipment for Memorial Park 11] Reports from Staff: *a] Department of Natural Resources Shoreland Grant Application *b] Approve Bills in the Amount of $360, 210. 17 c] Application for Premises Permit - American Legion d) Insurance Requirements for Tattoo License - memo on table *e] Tahpah Park Concession Stand Improvement Project TENTATIVE AGENDA March 16, 1993 Page -2- 11] Reports from Staff continued: *f) Milwaukee Manor Subdivision, Storm Sewer Oversizing Reimbursement *g] Stop Sign Request - 5th & Sommerville Street *h] Vehicle Diagnostic Scope *i] Maintenance Worker j ] Alley Grader - tabled 3/2 *k] Pike Lake Road 1] Downtown Alleys - Underground Utilities 12] Resolutions and Ordinances: *a] Res. No. 3763 - Authorizing Delivery of A Deed to Extinguish an Easement in Weinandt Acres 1st Addition *b] Res. No. 3761 - Approving Plans & Specifications for Stage II B of the Shakopee Bypass *c] Res. No. 3762 - Approving Agreement With MnDOT for Shakopee Bypass Covering City's Cost Participation for Ponds, Storm Sewers and Sidewalk *d] Res. No. 3760 - Ordering Improvements and Ad for Bids for Improvements Within Valley Park 11th *e] Ord. No. 355 - Eliminating Inconsistencies in the City Code Relating to Personnel Management Duties 13] Other Business: a] Metropolitan Development Investment Framework b] Budgeting Direction/1994 c] 14] Recess for an executive session to discuss land acquisition and collective bargaining 15] Re-convene 16] Adjourn Dennis R. Kraft City Administrator UPCOMING MEETINGS: March 23rd - Committee of the Whole March 30th - City Council (Public Improvement Hearings) ) D3 MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Lindberg S. Ekola, City Planner RE: Application For Rezoning For St. Francis Regional Medical Center - From Agriculture (Ag) to Multi-Family Residential (R-4) DATE: March 5, 1993 INTRODUCTION: At their March 4, 1993, meeting, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the application to rezone the proposed new medical center site from Agricultural (AG) to Multi-family Residential (R-4) . The proposed site is located approximately 1/2 mile south of the Vierling Drive/CR 17 intersection. (See Exhibit A. ) BACKGROUND: Staff has researched the zoning methods used by other metropolitan communities where hospitals or other large institutional facilities are located. A summary of that research is attached as Exhibit B. The Comprehensive Plan completed by BRW in 1990 recommended the creation of an institutional district for the area to the southwest of downtown. This land use category was intended to be a compact arrangement of public buildings and private land uses. The private land uses included the existing St. Francis Hospital and its related parking and private medical office buildings, professional office buildings, and single family and multi-family housing units. The text and land use map from the 1990 Comprehensive Plan are attached as Exhibit C. After the Committee of the Whole's review of the 1990 Comprehensive Plan, St. Francis requested that the City process a comprehensive plan amendment in order to allow the relocation of a new medical center outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) . The amendment was approved by the Metropolitan Council on June 25, 1992 , subject to five policies. The principal restriction established with these five policies limits the proposed site to institutional uses until such time the adjacent area becomes a part of the MUSA. Staff has identified three alternative underlying zoning districts which the property could be rezoned to in order to allow for the medical center to be located at the proposed site. Each of the alternatives would require either text and/or map changes to the Zoning Ordinance. The alternative districts include: 1. Create a new "Institutional" zoning district. 2 . Rezone the property to Highway Business, B-1. 3 . Rezone the property to Multi-Family Residential, R-4 . DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission discussed the three alternative zoning districts for the new St. Francis site at their February meeting. After the discussion, the Planning Commission directed staff to further research the R-4 option and provide information on how other cities regulate medical centers in terms of zoning. Based on the research shown on Exhibit B, several approaches have been taken by area cities in terms of the underlying zoning districts established for medical centers. Fairview Ridges in Burnsville has an R-3C district designation or their highest density residential district. The City of Edina has established a specific district, titled the Regional Medical District. Robbinsdale and Minneapolis have a combined residential-commercial district designation. The City of Shakopee's R-4 district is primarily intended to allow multiple dwellings on properties where adequate transportation services exist and have a proper relationship to other land uses. The R-4 district lists hospitals and clinics as conditional uses. The R-4 district also has a series of performance standards including larger setbacks for taller buildings, landscaping, screening and building material requirements which can more effectively regulate the proposed type of development. Attached as Exhibit D is a copy of the R-4 district regulations. The west property line of the proposed site is adjacent to CR 17, a minor arterial street. The 1990 Comprehensive Plan recommended a collector street to be constructed along the north end of the St. Francis site. CR 17 and the future collector street will provide the St. Francis site and other properties in the area with adequate transportation facilities. The Land Use Plan for the area around the proposed site recommends commercial and a mix of residential densities. The land uses are being planned in such a way as to minimize impacts of commercial development on future single family neighborhoods south of the Shakopee Bypass. With the changing health care needs facing the region, the proposed medical center will likely encompass a broader range of land uses than the existing St. Francis Hospital. Up to this point, St. Francis has proposed that the primary uses will include a new hospital, a clinic, medical offices, an emergency heliport and long term care facilities. It is likely that a range of residential uses, medical retail uses and some recreational facilities will also eventually become a part of the medical center site. Exhibit E is a copy of the proposed construction schedule for the medical center. For the uses proposed in the first two phases of the construction schedule, the R-4 district would provide St. Francis with the necessary underlying zoning provisions. As shown in Exhibit B, the Planned Unit Development (PUD) review process is commonly used by cities for medical centers and other large public facilities. Staff would encourage the use of the PUD process for the proposed medical center instead of the conditional use permit process because it provides a more comprehensive analysis. The PUD process allows flexibility and encourages creativity in the site planning process. Section 11.40, Subd. 3 of the Zoning Ordinance states that for those uses requiring a conditional use permit, the PUD procedures may be used in lieu of the conditional use procedure. For a project of this magnitude, it is staff's opinion that the PUD process is the more appropriate review method for both St. Francis and the City. At some point in the future, the City will need to address the creation of an institutional district as recommended by the Comprehensive Plan. There are several large facilities including the existing St. Francis Hospital, where the current underlying zoning district may not provide adequate land use controls. Attached as Exhibit F is a list of sites where the potential application for an institutional district could be feasible. At the March Planning Commission meeting, Ms. Sharron Bernhagen, owner of the 3 .4 acre parcel and the 16.29 acre parcel to the north of the St. Francis site expressed concerns over what would happen to her property. Her property is currently zoned Agricultural. With the St. Francis request, her property will not be rezoned. As shown in Exhibit G, the south half of the Bernhagen property (10 acres) is located in the recent 70 acre MUSA expansion area. The south 10 acres of the Bernhagen property is subject to the five policies established in the St. Francis comprehensive plan amendment including the institutional use limitation. Exhibit H is a list of the five policies. There are two basic alternatives to providing sewer service to St. Francis: 1. Wait for the South Shakopee Trunk Sewer Line; or 2 . Connect with the VIP Interceptor Decisions on who should pay for what utilities will be further addressed during the Petition for Improvements and subdivision platting processes. FINDINGS: Section 11. 04, Subd. 7 of the City Code states that amendments changing the boundaries or regulations of any existing district shall not be issued indiscriminately, but shall be based on findings or criteria including, but not limited, the criteria listed below: Criteria #1 The original zoning ordinance was in error. Finding #1 The zoning ordinance has not been found to be in error. Criteria #2 Significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place. Finding #2 Significant changes have taken place in the community goals and policies. Based on these changes, the Comprehensive Plan was amended to allow St. Francis to relocate to the proposed site. Criteria #3 Significant changes in City-wide or neighborhood development patterns have occurred. Finding #3 Significant changes will occur in the development patterns in the CR 17/Bypass Interchange area with the construction of the Bypass. The Comprehensive Plan has been amended to recognize the changes. Criteria #4 The amendment is necessary to implement the Comprehensive Plan's growth management program. Finding #4 The rezoning of this parcel from Ag to R-4 would not be in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan's growth management program. ALTERNATIVES: 1 . Rezone the property to Multi-Family Residential (R-4) . 2 . Rezone the property to Highway Business (B-1) . 3 . Create a new "Institutional" zoning district. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended approval of the application to rezone the property to Multi-Family Residential (R-4) , subject to the following conditions: 1. The PUD process shall be used for the review and approval of the new medical center. 2 . The subdivision plat for the property must be recorded for the site prior to the release of any building permits. 3 . Only institutional land uses will be allowed on the site until the surrounding area becomes a part of the urban service area. Retail sales may be allowed only if they are accessory to institutional uses. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Ordinance No. 353 , an Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map to Rezone Property Located on the East Side of County Road 17, Approximately One-Half Mile South of the Intersection of Vierling Drive and County Road 17, from an Agricultural (AG) Zoning District to a Multi-Family Residential (R-4) Zoning District, and move its adoption. ORDINANCE NO. 353, FOURTH SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD 17, APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF VIERLING DRIVE AND COUNTY ROAD 17, FROM AN AGRICULTURE (AG) ZONING DISTRICT TO A MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-4) ZONING DISTRICT. WHEREAS, on January 12 , 1993 , Brian Weinreis, Vice President of St. Francis Regional Medical Center, submitted an application requesting rezoning from Agriculture (AG) to Highway Business (B- 1) of land owned by Raymond C. Hennes and Roselle M. Hennes and described as follows: The Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) , the north 21. 15 feet of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) and the South half (S 1/2) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) , all in Section 18 , Township 115, Range 22 , Scott County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was scheduled for February 4 , 1993 , and was continued to March 4 , 1993 , to determine whether said property should be rezoned from Agriculture (AG) to Highway Business (B-1) , Multi-Family Residential (R-4) , or a newly created zoning district to allow for the proposed medical center to be constructed; and WHEREAS, notices duly sent and posted, and all persons appearing at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed this request at their public hearing on February 4 , 1993 , and March 4 , 1993 and voted to recommend denial of the rezoning request; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended that the site could be rezoned from Agricultural (AG) to Multi-Family Residential (R-4) , if the applicant agreed to the following conditions: 1. The PUD process shall be used for the review and approval of the new medical center. 2 . The subdivision plat for the property must be recorded for the site prior to the release of any building permits. 3 . Only institutional land uses will be allowed on the site until the surrounding area becomes a part of the urban service area. Retail sales may be allowed only if they are accessory to institutional uses; and WHEREAS, the applicant has agreed to these three conditions. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1 - That the zoning map adopted by reference in City Code Sec. 11. 21 is hereby amended by rezoning the property located in the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) , the north 21. 15 feet of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) and the South half (S 1/2) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) , all in Section 18, Township 115, Range 22 , Scott County, Minnesota, from Agricultural (AG) to Multi-Family Residential (R-4) . Section 2 - Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1993 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney Published in the Shakopee Valley News on the day of , 1993 . EXHIBIT A ;�Q-^JI ___I�E__�CJ' 1i✓�^—• •-.�y _ '.r�+rJ-���_'-�f. `_�\ M • i � 'i i� '•• (f_ I N ',1,;': 1lFi i I it It• h I $ { zi =1' L e., \1 Ir I`• ht iw~ISs.:- '.. ,,•47,-,....-7-;..<,•tr . ::. I L :! 1 .. ! 11 �' .�_=i' �'1. :i._��'_ .a_�l 11�ij,' :1�Ilsi.��:�-_.: ,, �1•..".y\`c',ti F" �f• -EE 1 i.- _ .. ,7 is`= 1t ' 7 7�7 r•,...;-—y'! •.F- S 4 P) II • ,:.%;•.. 's **A•7..•Fi4 fwd• .1. it --,.;-:._ .....:: ! i ..,i ' *.":""f'f'.." ,......-----3--... ...—t _. ..- -- ,...._ jI ;- - -- .�, ( MATCH LINE , — — — 4 { 1 — 1 ; „o 4111 1 :, o Y.Ind Ha Dr,OA. .. . __ . ' _ , . '\ c I - <: '- :: , • I A G l -_-- 1. . 'f'....- . .---J L 8 z II:•;?:1•OkaUt I • • : �-. ti I i ! i IL:tit pr, 124 TM.ST. •: w I H { I 1 e*',ATE I 3n•:.•;._NDR o i --`{t 1 S om-... { I 1 I '` 'CC PC 77 I 1 I I . . . ( F I I TURE I "1 i 1 ` ' AG AGRICULTURE • I+ _3 i R1 RURAL RESIDENTIAL Hl I R2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL T 3 R3 MID—DENSITY RES. i 4 ; ^ i R4 MULTI FAMILY RES. ' _�!. I ,20 ; ! B1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS •..==. ( B2 COMMUNITY BUSINESS ►-ipi -I I B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS j ! i ► I _ 11 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL re --=--\ ` 12 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ` I >>-.. c , C-RC e. —, S SHORELAND - ► 1 7 .e, oT :caE 1 r ! FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT, ; �, • ; —•—•• MANDATORY PUD : ' ,-'' r RTD RACETRACK DISTRICTi i -' •.7': — -` • Zoning Map City of SHAKOPEE EXIIIBIT B RESEARCH FOR PROPOSED REZONING ST. FRANCIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER February 9, 1993 Medical Facilities Burnsville Fairview Ridges Planned Unit Development Zoning: R-3C, Highest Density Residential. The City of Burnsville does not have an Institutional Zoning District. Conditional Use Permits required for hospitals in residential districts. However, a PUD was required in this instance because of the size of the development. It includes a church, elderly housing, etc. in addition to the medical center. Edina Fairview Southdale Planned Unit Development Zoning: RMD, Regional Medical District. The RMD allows hospitals, medical offices, dental offices, clinics and laboratories as permitted uses. Recreational facilities, living quarters for medical staff, helistops and medical retail are allowed as accessory uses. Minneapolis Hennepin Medical Center No PUD process involved. Permitted Use. Zoning: B4-C2 (Central Commercial District) , with the cleaning and medical supply portion of the development zoned for industrial uses. A planned unit development overlay zoning district is not required. Robbinsdale North Memorial Hospital Planned Unit Development Zoning: RB (Residential - Business) . With the recent expansions to the existing North Memorial the City of Robbinsdale has required the hospital to follow the PUD process. The underlying zoning district, RB, allows a broader range of residential and commercial uses including medical campus for North Memorial. Other Facilities Hastings Dakota County Government Center Zoning: PI , Public Institution Districts. The PI Zoning District is very broad. It permits not only governmental buildings, but hospitals, dormitories, and residential care facilities. Lino Lakes Men's Reformatory Prison Zoning: PSP District (Public and Semi-Public District) . No PUD process involved. Prisons are a permitted use. Shoreview Community Center Not a Planned Unit Development Zoning: R-1, Single Family Residential. Public Quasi- Public Facilities area a Permitted Use. Shoreview does not have an Institutional Zoning District EXHIBIT C .] 1,--_ `—, I - t ' 1 I 1 i aml 4 I 1 . MU_ i1 p1 i I Air I, I II- F-7-r------- 0 *-- o .;• .s 27 �1�► � I < 0 .-C., F 4-) U) C.) \ 0 v ILI 1 3-i '0 -- 3-1 41 ". • M .., i/ z< (...) -- •Rr 'O .r- 5 C ^� ,-H S ' 8 '.' 8 .';' g `,:i9 54 • - • irt 1 iial - Ion i . ..._. _,„ r, 4...., aillm. )-• 3 1 .i :-3 ri f3 U N • 1MO 1 / ; CZ --x '''' 1a O O D U w I!_!� 19O _ - .r.v� B ti,.ri U U w •.-1 s-) U 1 • t �i�. . - Cin u ti to CJ VI X O U1 C Oa 1 _ I 1L � mi __ In � U T35O . • 1 L � 1 Cl) •.i c3 r3 1~ U •-1 " - -r. I me 1.7=_J- O N .-i : c r3 li� U /A U) r C, tT N 1 t� .c' • II 1 �o2 I • r • C U U U1 U) to .� !Il�� MI* �� 1 s+l771 E711-1 f r{ o.. U) O •r1 U S2 :•z Tj �- /fit► _ c Cl) 0 •r-1 14 w 11 ' t 1i 0 X U CL w ;-.) "' - _ 5 I U >, • •r1 tri : �efts gatL - t2 , I••-i st C 1. i L trl Mr -to iL , \ \ t 2 al :-t 'CS H rJ - C v U 1-1 •'-i Cl) CLO _ _J Z Q ri •ri r-i �^ O 1-1 Q 4 -4Z' U . ,--4 ! g • U O -� w r—i ' O , i 171 ID 71 cl, O • O OO Xd U L.)1.1'D t- U U - U r3 a) U) C ) r R- 1..... . 1I J 5 N CJ Uri ---1 O --.r— 4- tr., - rU4 ,•r101 U N. 1 - U \ I ! HH . a U17I — U Ur =v ' �• ' ' _ .i 'LS O ' 1 o In U rv - 0 \ 0 � .;.J CO U) 4-) 14 •ri G.) \. 11 S 1 1 1 c r0:7_1 c i a s a) ! !GIVfl 4-4 ,� c, U >, \k — k, --i'— _ f _: LE---- _— ,.1 c 4. _____, r, ,.., --4 ,-{ ..0 5 til c — , C O O rJ S1 Sa -P w �t rIr 1 - - _� _ O tr 1J •,--4 RS • - e I. 1_4, - _____j- Li flj( CLU •;-J J, ea 5 ri 411,2 c 6 li ' r . < l •49 —AI - ,., • • l I 1 I / : o 1 — 1 EXHIBIT D 3 11 . "_' - A. Open off-street parking space not to exceed three spaces per dwelling unit. B . Garages . C . Fences . D. Gardening and other horticultural uses where no sale of products is conducted on the site . Subd. 5. Lot Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Require- ments. A. No building hereafter erected shall exceed two and one-half (2-1/2) stories or thirty-five (35) feet in height . B. The following minimum requirements shall be observed subject to additional requirements , exceptions , and modifications set forth in other Sections of this Chapter : Minimum Lot Area (Single Family Detached) : 9, 000 sq.ft . Minimum Lot Area Per Unit (Two-Family Dwelling) : 5, 500 sq. ft . Minimum Square Footage Per Multi-Family + and Townhouse Unit: 4,000 sq.ft. Minimum Lot Width (Single-Family Detached) : 60 feet Minimum Lot Width (Two-Family Dwelling) : 70 feet Minimum Lot Width (Townhouse & 3-6 Units) : 100 feet Front Yard: 35 feet Side Yard : 10 feet Rear Yard: 30 feet SEC. 11.28. MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-4) . Subd. 1. Purpose. The R-4 Multiple Family Districts are intended to provide a district which will allow multiple-family dwellings where properly related to other land uses, and adequate transportation services exist. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. Within any Multi-Family Residential District no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: A. Multiple dwelling unit structures under 30 feet in height . B . One and two family residences . C . Townhouses . D . Public recreation . E. Essential services . F. Community residential facilities subject to the following conditions: 1. It shall not be located in a two-family dwelling . 2. No more than 16 community residential facility residents may be housed in excess of the persons allowed by the definition of "family", except that structures designed or newly built specifically for such use may allow a greater number provided that all other conditions of conditional use permit are met . -304- j 11 . 25 3. The minimum lot size is that prescribed for one-family dwellings . 4. A minimum distance of 300 feet will be required between lots used for community residential facilities. Source : Ordinance No . 31, 4th Series Effective Date: 10-25-79 G. Class II day care facility . Source: Ordinance No . 254 , 4th Series Effective Date : 5-26-89 Subd. 3. Conditional Uses. Within the Multi-Family Residential District no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: A. Community center . Source : Ordinance No. 31, 4th Series Effective Date: 10-25-79 B. Multiple dwelling unit building over 30 feet in height. Source: Ordinance No. 60, 4th Series Effective Date : 5-14-81 C. Nursing homes . D. Nursery schools . E. Accessory offices retail sales . F. Churches. G . Commercial recreational. H. Cemeteries . I . Hospitals and clinics . J. Schools. K. Local government buildings . L. Residential group homes, subject to R-3 conditions . Source : Ordinance No . 31 , 4th Series Effective Date : 10-25-79 n. All structures in excess of 45 feet in height . Source: Ordinance No. 60, 4th Series Effective Date : 5-14-81 N. Bed and Breakfast Inn, subject to the following conditions : erator 1. In the R-4 District the owner or op shall reside upon thproperty submit the operationnoft pthe for approval by thePlanning Commission, for facility. 2. The establishment must comply with State Health and Building Code requirements . ( _2-1-39 . 3 1: . ns 3. Only guests shall be served . 4. The facility shall be limited to five guest rooms or a maximum guest capacity of ten. 5. The buildings must be at least 75 years old . 6. Guest stay shall be limited to thirty (30) days . 7. Off-street parking shall be p=o.'id_•? i.. accordance with the parking requirements of this Chapter . A minimum of one space per guest room and one space for the operator shall be required . 8. Signage shall be in accordance with the provisions of the City Code regulating signs . Source : Ordinance No . 159 , 4th Series Effective Date: 2-28-85 0. Private clubs and lodges . Source : Ordinance No. 203 , 4th Series Effective Date : 7-10-86 P. Class I day care facility . Source : Ordinance No. 264, 4th Series Effective Date: 5-26-89 Subd. 4. Permitted Accessory Uses. Within any "R-4" District the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses: A. Same as "R-3". Subd. 5. Lot Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Require- ments. A. The following minimum requirements shall be observed subject to additional requirements , exceptions , and modifications set forth in other Sections of this Chapter . Minimum Lot Area Per Family Unit (Townhouses) : 4 , 000 sq.ft . Minimum Lot Area Per Family Unit (Multi-Family Structures) : 1 bedroom 2,400 sq.ft . 2 bedroom 3 ,000 sq.ft . 3 bedroom 4 , 500 sq. ft . Minimum Lot Width (Multi-Family) : 100 feet Front Yard : 50 feet Side Yard: One-half height of building or fifteen (15) feet whichever is greater . Rear Yard: 40 feet - - . ---- --- 5 11 . _ 3 Highrise Setback Regulations : The location of a highrise structure (30 feet or higher ) shall be a minimum of four (4) times the height of the structure from the nearest R-1, R-2, or R-3 District line or principal structures . Source : Ordinance No. 96, 4th Series Effective Date: 11-11-32 Subd. 6. Performance Standards. A. Acceptable Building Materials. (For applicable provisions , see Section 11 . 60 , Subdivision 5) . B. Required Parking Setback. (For applicable provisions , see Section 11. 60, Subdivision 6) . C. Landscaping Requirements. (For applicable provisions , see Section 11 . 60, Subdivision 7) . D. Screening. (For applicable provisions , see Section 11 . 60 , Subdivision 3, Subparagraph D) . 1. Roof Top Facilites . (For applicable provisions, see Section 11.60, Subdivision 3, Subparagraph D, Item 1. 2. Parking Areas. (For applicable provisions, see Section 11. 60, Subdivision 3, Subparagraph D, Item 2) . 3. Outdoor Storage and Trash Handling . (For applicable provisions , see Section 11. 60 , Subdivision 3 , Subparagraph D, Item 3) . 4. Loading and Service Areas. (For applicable provisions, see Section 11.60, Subdivision 3, Subparagraph D, Item 4) . Source : Ordinance No . 246 , 4th Series Effective Date : 6-17-88 SEC. 11.29. HIGHWAY BUSINESS (B-1) . Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Highway Business District is to recognize development opportunity and need for commercial establishments fronting on or with immediate access to major highways. Permitted land uses should take advantage of the highway access in a manner which other business districts are not afforded. Also acceptable are quasi-industrial and wholesale enterprises that do not meet an industrial setting and have considerable customer contact . Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. Within any Highway Business District, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses : A. Motels, motor homes, hotels (lot must have 400 square feet per unit . -305- , __ _ EXHIBIT E PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE St. Francis Regional Medical Center Source: November, 1992 EAW Construction Date Building Functions Employees Square Feet Phase I September, 1993 Clinic/Medical Office 80 17,000 sf Phase II Spring 1994 Hospital (70 beds) 80 160,000 sf Spring 1994 Medical Office 110 34,000 sf Later Phases 2000-2005 Clinic (2nd floor) 80 17,000 sf 2000+ Long Term Care 60 17,000 sf (140 residents) 2000+ Clinic/Medical Office 110 34,000 sf March 31, 1993 Option Date for St. Frances on property purchase. EXHIBIT F List of Sites: Potential Application for the Proposed Institutional District February 9, 1993 Municipal City Hall SPUC Public Works/Police Future Community Center Fire Station - Existing and Future City Parks Municipal Parking Lots ISD 720 Senior High School Junior High School Sweeney Elementary Central Elementary Pearson Elementary County Courthouse State Women Correctional Facility Federal Post Office Private/Non-Profit Existing St. Francis Hospital Proposed St. Francis Medical Center Churches Cemeteries Private Schools EXHIBIT H XI. INSTITUTIONAL USES To provide a site for the St. Francis Regional Medical Center in Shakopee. a. Only institutional land uses will be allowed in the proposed expansion area and no residential or commercial uses will be permitted until the area becomes part of planned expansions tro the urban service area as approved. by the Metropolitan `council. Retail sales may be allowed only if they are accessory to the institutional uses . b. Encourage the development of a safe and efficient transportation system. Ensure that all street and driveway intersections are located and spaced to maintain a high degree of mobility. • C. Only institutional uses may be connected to the existing City sewer system until the surrounding area becomes part of a planned expansion to the urban service area. d. All storm water drainage requirements of the City of Shakopee, the Shakopee Basin Water Management Organization and the Lower Minnesota Watershed District must be met. e. All heliport facilities must meet the required federal, state, regional and local goverment policies and regulations . Encourage the reservation of flight path corridors for helicopters to promote compatibility of future area development; --....kwzr. v $ or •-•• orie op.,iftimw ........!--- TAlw •N.! .;„...''' .......- . n r . .. ..4 .-I--- sI hi' '0 li+ 'NW I.. NIL,.......1/1•••••• 61147 . . ,_,1‘.--•,4 •Alt • 111..--4.01111`. ..'111 ..I .IC. •'• •-..•••••,11.'i.;:s . . .it A2,...-4*. 1.4.;*1 , 1...........isik....illa Irwilaill...160.0,0107".111111611 Ilk, .,iNlitr.11110, 1"'tj''.:, st.P.':'4%.4.1 410 1 ,":::itql . ••.F..1 , 1161116k, .• .k,„..s.tfo...,5,..foti!!.....,i:Lo. ' ,,,,,..,...11 ...,;• 1„,,.. • ..-.:-; . . ,,e...- -.• .„------------411116, NI .,,- -1.. -.,.7 ,:. , 1•1.1.. - t '.±.-•pti ifiii•::.. , ::,:::, 4, • soot. 1111 oXvh, ., . . . • !11!If., . .'-!.':•-,ixl. ., 1't! *.:::....' • * 1 • --zr- : kig - ' ell; •'111' '4•1i•'... ''t••:1:' . .!•"; V::: • - • '4- - • • 't, '... . 41 1. •%1 t,' ••••-.• III vas 1. % `.;Thl .fit,.i! :.,6-tiA :,.;,:•474-ait\ - ..........., . ........,...,- -1 1 Se 1 I bk --- : ' . • us• LIST g. • . rA et.°4 1,,,41,. . 3 F TAION% .1? A...-',. •Arki mu .111 116. 1.10 likiv . L • `." rard%ii;i gole•OW•-' • - L•CI*. Siti .%iiiiiioll1/4, 1116. . ....- :•'-i., 1;i1GR'A. 1,:z,R ..... - •• ,i •• •11. .• ,t, .ci. •:.,‘,.-..1::,:r2,..;,r..: 7.-11..;:li...1 io.:4', ..!.,... .7' ‘.7 l f ..._,1-4F.'k .., . ‘....,..t..1: ; ;11:1':;:P/P,' Ail.42 'VI!•1 'iv-11, ' •A• T..._ : • ..}:„.i..t,i ,,,,t„..„ rspio... r'11... . iciik4.;•64 i. 1 ..1' 4'3t 4. '•' 4' ilk IMLIOA. N L II l ‘ik 3,70.v."46, • i 1. ,,,,tt„,,,,i.. . '. .reill..4„.t*%" ti .. • ; r w .. liZA.,ir 1'4 ,,;4• ie• ,',... 7.v. .,:., : 4'41. : a.r,a4Bei:64...1th . ,:•.7s. 1 sz. till ...t., S"I I i WI. •"';M:41:t.:.. a ...iti. i'''.. ...,!".. . lc?' 4t.'%.*. : ._ 11 1 1 7:hlk liklikh:14 ,- bib. . :41...1,..2...„:.;ir,,4,.,:;.• ...,40::...,i,iii;;:liti7: :;: 4, c : : ..:..if:::.....•:...,. .. 'i• 44131"! _.-. :.;".,...g • -,.- vri91 Its: ...„,.„:, a., --el. -. , .,...: .. _. . -1.,,, 4....ymrazt.. , :. .:• ,r).,...,,-c• .7• _-7•_-.-J ... ..L. NI ..., migi E 1 1 ,.7Liill‘11111, IL., .. . *1.,: t..,: ..: 7.•••.:, -1.. :.•tfbiqc...... i,..i.:...ti.l....:•.;,,;,1 IlL b. I.. I h.% kl& • )1 k 1.1 I 611 Rd I•I& . 1... .,4.i...,+,60:, --.. la -1. .......,,,..„-:..!........-• . . . ,. lompliami.... .4.040.4 ,11,..A,_-,_-: . • .. .....ei!..i!: : .,1 .:..,:i...?,;. . • I, .., .• ,:- :.. .,..,... '1';0;c7,1r4t?ert,‘:•,. ..L.ey ••• `4,;:.-.1t"...... • ineW,:..41PAPV. Ptet7J?.,..:''''c4. :,,i0.' ;:,..''''.0:,::i'''..r.....-:„,,,...*•::: .,...A,..7ak •'14144 :C• '.."•: • . .1;'•••::•;:t.:i•i..r.N::...tiftri*".;:ft'A.:0,4Ar-AM'''''.4 .„ . ••• •1*.;''•',4';',..:' elf 4;:f4'.., ,,tr. ' .4:14,r,`"•t:4.•,:i . • • :•• .h, . .: ,..•• .4.46.4.•••..L.,,,,,._.07_ ril reS, *.• • ::•..i:;:•••.:;,'''':?"--,:i :Fi.'•:0 •U'illit#: .:MA4,4:...:.A -, •. • i 015 f•-,5420%941: .Zi..•';...:- .Aibi41 '. '' .' i..-'' ‘V-Z", '-' .11'';31, . .• . • .ii':, 1):,,-gi ,.iiii ii.• l'-.,;' . '..q ,' 3•... ',..• r. ti .*;•Cir:::'.7:::!sle();:' -'1('.. 411P14-t613-4.:.'.42.i.:.''....:f:.1.4.,,,..„4-24.'''-...i...,..4.,:.4::.. .. r...., „.,,.;. , 1 ..LI-,- , -. .: ,,- ....*.4,.,,,w,„,..,.„:„:„.,..4.„-„,„. .,..,..dn.,..4,:„.•.,..p:::..,.,...„*......„km„ft-&::v0,11,4 • ,.2.4. •- .• ..•. ,•,.„ .„-..--..., L ,,....,•,.,..... smi.:.;:limul..-Ta!". ' . .*,. . ,,,',..4r.•.!.*6.0',*:!',..-,,,,:,.,•:,:',,,,:•-•••;3'.1ni.'rv.- , , ' A•••;,;',i. iii:4,.,Vaj 37.71. -,i,e.-•.• . 1:4i'41317: :;t::,' -''lk r: , : r. • ! . ,.,,... ,4,-• , .4.,,..,1 ..,..i;, ,,:::,,,, ,f...... , i..,*...i.m.:W.„,wri'..:-:..,;!..•,:.?:....'ipp,4. ::: -i•i.. :k,.1•.. :.W.s.. .41.- : - 1,„ .. ,.,.. in:o..W .4.,0N.-.,.%,i:.*-.•:.'lit s„•,,,-!:.•-, -•s-:, ;. ••••, m. •••••• ' .,.PAP,SI:,,a4.:."•/.1r:-,•••°:'. .., • ... ,•,.: ,-. -ii,...,,.:4r•••:-'44:a hinfi'Pctr6.1h4alkiili,.. ,' .4 i,..... .(.1" 1;4'' I'' • .'.'.1 .. ; ‘"...-Iiiiqrt,t, ,:,:kteRPN:wk: ...A.' •.'•.:-• ...,-.0%, ..'. A•.iii':.•-;ige*., I pi,-,14,-02.--,".. - ,.. . .,1,4,i,,,.. - 'd. '..4 1 'V."7.' ••: ' .i.'4k... 'Walt r:•:41 priu-,;4*: :'*•:*•,..,:,..v:::: --4 -,::,.. e'. ...1. ''''i'.:M:P•A•v:'••'<:"... •.4 ,.''•'!i••A.•:.r- , • . ,o, 4.., n,•.,-,', . . ' ..: , . ,..t.s..4,t ,,::-,,::,-,-+,...,.:,,,,,,.. - -".4:-.- 00:-,..,..,..-:-....r. -....- . .., ..,,,....., . .:it i.n. Aim -. .'... L'' ..% '- 4" IA- -„.-••4 . 71,.., . . Ittim It,,.,•-•,.-- -, .,,,,, .. . -... . t ,- ,--- --?- - . . - •- arm-A.,4-,,..a.po,;.,,,,:•..,....:.0.,,-,..-?".;.....:.-.0ft, .k).54, ?:...e., .,.g....0 .:3 , ,8 - ...„ ,. •.. .,,,,,,-,...-, ., . .• ,,, •,... • . .,....:0,,,Tom: ........,...,..,::.,,,.. g-,.,:,. ts:..6:,...,.0.* .,4 ! 3 z t.,. . -,4-.4 1,...j, .,,r, . .__. -..- .- ; - • . -. - . - •- - _ % Go :04.im.i 4,1.4. ,:•,,,,k,,, ,..'• k.,X,•••: ::V;KS„,,...,','. 1ft:...K....M:-..M:::':. 'C••: .-- . :•:.••• ' i...' ."' .1„ 3 .va.:!...z::: :,.A.N-ptim vil::....•4:,,*:-.t .,::.;:.•.•':'.4:•....:,,:i<.:•-:::,K..0; ;-......, :, .....i:.,,i.,:'ii ,.' . .Ana.ii,enri3.45:... ••7..0,..55.: !.......,..„..k....`70,.., ......:::il.,44.;:',•wmAi.• ie.' ,*-.,,. ,A:.:::.p.m:i•;:•'..:ia.,:wmft:00:g..x.• ,;:,..i,•izw,....*,,- ;,;,.,.,..,, ..., „.0«.1.., ,„:57.• ual•;u.;,;..., ,. ,, LI, a.;:giVi,.:k va4ekii•'....k -• ,K-Alva! porAtt-rail .. . .- .- .. • ... - • .,•„•,,,„.v.;.•5: ..,,,,•:,,,,,,,•,,,m,p.4,-. • . vr...!,3„:0.•... . 4,. .-- IN4 ‘ SA LINE ._ „„,„,,,,_.„,„:.„...„..,.::.,::x„,r;••...:. ....•• ,.........-,, ,..„ .: •. .,...,:,,..,.„,,,,,„,:.......„.•,...'.",...,..........• • . „,....., . _ ..„, ....:_,,..,„ . PRE. 1q612 ' EI.',,:11,4,1:‘%..Z, ,-.i•./..- -$16:14 ••••%. I I .1-1- ......--ism"'""" ow 0034:Aff4f..: ..fr *ti• A.,, • .. 4.....--.., km.0:mo,.... s 1 0.., .. ,-.it.; . 1 04.0A0.,M:'••• •". • •- •.. -...-.- 1 1004 :r ° NI HAG • ... SHAKOPEE - JACKS .• . . . . . . . . . . .. •• . . , . ". Mao. -,v PEATY , 1 ) • . . • - • . 0 RAN • 15 5 TE- 1 (00fac- cn r•-• ct 1 17 ... 0 18 - riONNIN=1,,MI 0 •-• WI, IIMEMEnr........i : • Et4 111 -- - Sik iNto . . . .: 14.1 - • LA.11 H C3 = l Z L .et = C') CO RD 77 _ )--i ..: _ ____ _ • Li- r. . • s St. CD t-• . , ... 1 .•;,[:. • = • ..i il Ig 4 CI, ›iim .. •• . . ' . ' ...tr• = 1. • ! ....... 6 • • 1.- CONSENT i6C__ Memo to: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator From: Barry Stock, Community Services Director Subject: New Playground Equipment for Memorial Park Date: March 9, 1993 Introduction At its February 22, 1993 meeting, the Shakopee Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommended to the City Council that the appropriate City officials be authorized to prepare plans and specifications and solicit bids for new playground equipment at Memorial Park. Background In 1976, as part of the Bi-Centennial Celebration and Re- dedication of Veterans Memorial Park, the Shakopee Rotary Club purchased 11 pieces of timberline Playground Equipment for Memorial Park. Today, for various reasons, only 2 pieces remain. Memorial Park is a road side community park used primarily for picnicking, hiking, biking and sometimes High School x-county running meets. During the school year, it is often used as a resting place for school groups that visit Valleyfair or Murphy's Landing. Memorial Park is also the site of many large group picnics. For example, the VFW and Legion Clubs have their annual picnics at Memorial Park. The VFW attracts as many as 400-500 people to their annual picnic. Needless to say, two pieces of playground equipment is insufficient for a community park. Staff recommends having a large central play area with modern play equipment. The area should have enough equipment to accommodate 20-30 children at one time; meet U.S. Product Safety standards and guidelines; be accessible for those with disabilities; have separate play areas for different age groups and have interconnected play units for continuous play. Estimated cost of a project of this magnitude is about $50, 000. The 1993 Park Capital Improvement Program identifies $25, 000 in the Park Reserve Fund to install new playground equipment in Veterans Memorial Park. Staff did present a plan for new playground equipment to the VFW Club. However, we haven't heard back from them as to whether they plan to contribute to the project or not. Arrangements are being made to meet with the Legion Club to see if they have an interest in the project. Should both organizations decline to 1 participate, perhaps the $50, 000 project could be done over a two or three year period. Otherwise, we can keep the project within the $25, 000 budgeted amount and expand at a later date. There are adequate funds in the Park Reserve Fund to do an expanded project this year at Memorial Park if council so desires. The Park and Recreation Advisory Board is recommending that two bid options be prepared in terms of project scope. Option #1 would approximate a project in the area of $25, 000 and option #2 would focus on an expanded project in the $50, 00 price range. This option would provide staff with more time to solicit funding from the American Legion and VFW. It would also provide us with a firmer grasp of the project cost. Upon reviewing the bids, a recommendation will be prepared for Council approval in regard to which option to pursue. Alternatives 1. Prepare Playground Equipment plans and specifications for bidding two options in terms of project scope. 2 . Change the scope of the project by raising the fund allocation from $25, 000 to $50, 000 and do the project this year. 3 . Change the scope of the project by raising the fund allocation from $25, 000 to $50, 000 and do the project over a two year period. 4 . Keep the project within the $25, 000 budget allocation with no plans of further expansion. 5 . Change the scope of the project from a $25, 000 fund allocation to $50, 000 and do the entire project in 1994 . 6. Do nothing. Recommended Action Staff recommends alternative #1. Action Requested Move to recommend the appropriate City officials be authorized to prepare plans and specifications and solicit bids for new playground equipment at Memorial Park. Specifications to include two bid options in terms of project scope. 2 CONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner RE: Department of Natural Resources Shoreland Grant Application DATE: March 4 , 1993 INTRODUCTION: On July 3, 1989, the revised Statewide Standards for "Management of Shoreland Areas" rules became effective (Minnesota Rules Part 6120.2500 - 6120. 3900) . The City of Shakopee must upgrade the land use controls in the shoreland ordinance by September 1, 1994, to comply with the new rules. DISCUSSION: Staff has recently been informed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) that the City can apply for a matching grant for an amount up to $5, 000 from the State of Minnesota to assist in the shoreland ordinance update. Attached is a copy of the "Shoreland Grant Application" . Since the Shoreland District is a part of the Zoning Ordinance, the completion of this grant application would provide up to $5, 000 in matching grant funding for this portion of the ordinance update. The deadline to submit this application is March 31, 1993 . ALTERNATIVES: 1. Apply for grant money assistance of up to $5, 000 matching fund dollars to assist in the City's updating of the Shoreland Management Ordinance to make it consistent with the new statewide standards. 2 . Do not apply for grant money assistance. 3 . Table the decision and request additional information. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1, that the City apply for grant money assistance of up to $5, 000 matching fund dollars to assist in the City's updating of the Shoreland Management Ordinance. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer a motion directing staff to submit the Shoreland Grant Application to the DNR, and move its adoption. STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SHORELAND GRANT APPLICATION WHEREAS, the State, as provided. by Minnesota Statutes 103F.201-221 and Minnesota Rules parts 6120. 2500 through 6120. 3900 pertaining to Statewide Standards for "Management of Shoreland Areas"; and WHEREAS, the State is authorized by the Laws of 1991, Chapter 254, Section 5, Subd 3 to provide grant assistance for Cities to adopt a shoreland management ordinance consistent with statewide standards. NOW THEREFORE, subject to available funding, it is hereby requested by the City of Shakopee. MN that an agreement be entered into by the State of Minnesota, acting by and • through the Commissioner of Natural Resources and the City of Shakopee, MN , to provide grant money assistance up to $5,000. 00 matching fund dollars, for the purposes of adopting a shoreland management ordinance consistent with statewide standards. BY: Mayor DATE: • • BY: City Administrator BY: City Clerk CONSENT There are not anticipated "budget versus actual expenditure" problems within division totals apparent at this point (3/93) for the 1993 budget. Attached is a print out showing the budget status as of 03/12/93 for 1993 based on data entered as of that date. Included in the bill list is the return of the balance of the developers deposit for Heritage 2nd. The assessments covered have been paid. _3i/2/9 3 CITY OF SHAKOPEE EXPENSES BY DEPARTMENT CURRENT YEAR ANNUAL MONTH TO PERCENT YTD BUDGET DEPT DEPT NAME BUDGET ACTUAL DATE EXPENDED BUDGET PERCENT 00 N/A 0 -16,741 -89,860 0 0.00 0 11 MAYOR & COUNCIL 69,140 2,637 10,895 16 17,284.83 25 12 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 246,770 7,362 44,096 18 61,692.09 25 13 CITY CLERK 110,960 3,692 18,193 16 27,739.86 25 15 FINANCE 264,540 8,313 34,163 13 66,134.64 25 16 LEGAL COUNSEL 131,820 3,756 19,755 15 32,954.58 25 17 PLANNING 288,740 8,004 34,935 12 72,184.59 25 18 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 114,160 4,855 17,344 15 28,539.54 25 31 POLICE 1,302,920 55,864 298,056 23 325,729.44 25 32 FIRE 805,820 831 19,397 2 201,454.68 25 33 INSPECTION-BLDG-PLMBG-HTG 128,780 5,004 22,819 18 32,194.59 25 41 ENGINEERING 332,090 6,897 43,552 13 83,022.09 25 42 STREET & ALLEY MAINTENANCE 682,720 14,269 85,157 12 170,679.18 25 44 SHOP 148,120 5,104 14,845 10 37,029.63 25 46 PARK MAINTENANCE 315,940 4,708 34,585 11 78,984.09 25 48 GARBAGE COLLECTION 513,550 39,206 79,262 15 128,387.25 25 61 POOL 150,300 0 4,110 3 37,574.70 25 64 RECREATION 194,110 5,663 34,721 18 48,527.31 25 91 UNALLOCATED 177,000 2,662 97,060 55 44,249.97 25 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 5,977,480 162,086 823,085 14 1,494,363.06 25 17 PLANNING 360,860 14,269 49,337 14 90,214.74 25 TOTAL TRANSIT 360,860 14,269 49,337 14 90,214.74 25 12 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 64,870 1,020 4,032 6 16,217.22 25 TOTAL HRA 64,870 1,020 4,032 6 16,217.22 25 00 N/A 889,400 0 0 0 222,349.98 25 TOTAL CAPITAL EQUIP REVOLVING FUND 889,400 0 0 0 222,349.98 25 • C) C) X 0 Z r r H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H CO V 0% %0 CO V 0% UI 4, W N H Z t' 0 C) r r H H H r H r H H H H r H H H 0 x .o .o .o .o .o %0 .o .0 .0 .0 .a .0 .o .a .0 .0 x to •0 .0 .o .0 •0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .o .o .o .0 .a .0 .0 t=7 C) w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w C) 7C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 7C ZI w w w w www w w w w w w w w w 0 til \ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ a 0 0 0 0 H r r r r H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H .0 .0 .0 H H H H H H CO N1 1.3 IV NI IV tV t=) Cl) H 01 C) '2 x CII <I)<I) C) </3<A </></) NNN<INN CO CO <1)<A 7C 'T, H H t%3 IV UIHHHH 00 H H <I)</> . . . .. .y<0 <I)<I) . H HH 00 <I)<) 4, r u+ rrLit H -v)to 00 )...3 L.) 0. 0. iv N., <n<1) 00 00 UI UI CO CO .Iw4, '00 UI UI .0 .0 .t V UI UI UI UI .r` w<I) <I)<0 0 L-3 La 00 t.) t.) 00 0% HH .o4, 00 00 H H .o .0 0% 0% rear .0 .o C W taut OO OO 00 co UI .o .0 co V 00 OO NN r r 00 4. 0% V 0. 0. y UI UI 00 00 H H 0i, W 01 LA 00 00 VI ILA W W 00 IV0. 0% A . * * * * * * * * * * * * H N • 0 a a 0000Pil 03 y x z0 .0 C '17 0 0 0 0 H _) 0 Jd C/3 0 H H aC 0000 mo 0 HHRH Pi .0.0 .o MI O tII Z C7 N N N to 0 t r t=) C) ttr3 t40 W Z Z "A / 9 Z t4 C-1 CII H H H 7y 0 Cl) v) C) I tri tzi 71 •o H 04 0 H x z CI C C0 tar'' O c C) 7Z�C Z z C 0 'b �' Z y 0 v) Cn hn 7d L-1 Z C40 H 0 04 o z r r z00 10 C y � � z 011 0cI CI .0 = C VI w H 73 H�+ CO 4, P31 0 C UI Z X 0 03 0 ° d y z t4 to H Cr) H O 73 z H H H Pt 03 H z H a 0 Z z C) 03 0 0. 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %0 .a .0 .0 .0 t, Un H CO V H H H w V H CO CO CO CO CO 4, CO CO H W V+ UI In W H H H r H H H C C)) H V t.) 0 r c.) tV H H r r o 0 0 0 0 C) I I I I I I I I I I to 0 4- 4- 4, tV 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, A A N N N N N til 0 NI UI Iv H 4, 4, 4. t.) w w H H H H H H ,ro Z " w w .t H H H . - %0 CO H .t .I .t V .t y 0 0 0 V 0000 0 UI 0 CO Co W H lV 0 0 v+ .0 0 0 0 0 0 to 0 0 H H H H 0 0 4, 0% 0000 0 r o 0 r 4-- 4, r H 0 0 .0 to 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 0 0. 0. 0. 0. Z V V 0. .0 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 CO r 4, r r r 0 r A 0 N H 0% .a .0 %0 .0 CO W V 0% H .o C) CO ts) z 0 z Ub Co 0 to 7i V 0 0 0 H H H R H H H H 1-3 H H H H .Z' 04 x x x Pi 7y 7d 70 70 Pi 70 7d 7d ZI 7d 7y 7i a a t• r 0 0 ..... 0 Z W Ni N N N N N N N N N H H O .O CO J O. vt 1 W N H 0 •O Z t" 0 H H H H H H H H r H r H H H H H C) x .o .o .D 1/40 .D .D 1/40 .0 .O 1/40 .D 1/40 .a 1/40 .O .O x t11 .0 .D .o .o .0 .0 .0 .0 1/40 .D 1/40 .0 .D 1/40 .O .D t1] 0 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w 0 7C \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 7C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :v w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w C7 CI \ \ \\ \\ .- \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ a 0 O O 0 o O O o 0 O O o O o O O O H H .D ,p '.p .0 '0 .O .O 1/40 .D 1/40 .O .O .D 1/40 1/40 .O t11 y C11 0 7y X tr1 0 <I> <n v> 7C "4 r r H r SII <o <i) H .4- r v)v) r <n <I) N v) N {n<n{n r <n<n <n v> <n v) v+ v+ <n <n r r rn O. v+ v+ CO 1/40 CO CO A w CO O. N N A CO w w 01 01 0 0 r r 0 0 v> <a 0 v+ v+ 0O v+ Joo ra• A Aow Nor .o .0 0 co Co r r .p- Z• O. a. Z O O 0 0 O. V+ O A O. J -.1 .D CO N J V+ A 1A 0 0 .0 .O 0 0 � L 0 0 '-3 0 0 0 0 0 -4 w H .O N •O .D 0 J O. H O. O. O O N N 0 0 A 0 0 * * * * * * * * * * * * Ni 1-. o C) C) C) 0x 0x 0 0 0 0 C� C0 to co co 9 H OX 9 9 tom-' tom-' b b Q' '�C C .p En 1-ti cn cn rn '0 9 g [ z z sr to z t" 71 w�' y as g z to ael el CO CO y CC) t' H .O . Cl) �3 13 d 0 0 0 73 0 7a H a t ril < N Co z P 0 O r t CO 0 hi Iv Xs t--4to z 0 H Cl) C./) VIH En 0 ril tri H Cl) xO 0 t=1 00 0 9 C ;c 7J ZH H Cr CC) H a 0 1-3 En 0 P•C hi hi trl trl ba 0 '3 0-3 VI tri Iz1 tri �' a ra t717d 7V ,0 ,0 C hi CI t11 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 d C .0 0 0 �. C H t+] t• t' C C C om' 1-3 C H H ril Ti' H H t' t11 Cr, H H H H [11 t" t' C.1 CI ro ,-C1t7 'v ro ro ro hi hi H 1-3 d hi Cl) Cl) XX HH X XX X (n Cl) t17 t.1 z H 0 0 C11 C11 Ill [11 a CaZ CI 0 z d H H z z 0 z z z z z Z Z t4 '' 0 0 H H 0 CI C11 H H H 0"3 C/> H C/1 H � XX H N C i� t' r H H z hi H H H '-3 H H Cl) Cl) z z H ill z z Z Z H Zy C/) C11 H PI c z z H z z a a Z 0 H H zz �' zz z Z Z tn1 t00 � � VI � Cr/ VI Cl)n tl1 CTI O. co O O O O O O o 0 O O 0 N 0 Z a Ln r W W r r W W r r 1` W N CO r 1� n .D N N r co a) r N v1 O. 4:- r w N H Z 0 v+ O. r r N H H H H H r N ta I I I i I i I I I I I I J` •I C11 Cl 4▪) A A TV -Ps -P. A l � 4 A NJ A � N Z H N N N N W W N N N N N v N A 1-3 H H 0 0 H N N 0 0 0 0 H co 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 H H o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 00 J 0 < J J J -.4 J J -.4 J J J J J J r H r 0 -4 H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 W N H H 0 0 •0 •0 J -4 Co O. U' 0 H to z 0 z ro Cd 0 tri b Po 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 09 a X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Cl t" N C) C) x o 9 94- 94- 9 94- 94- 9r V 4- V4- 94- 94- 94, x 0Z 4, 4, F A W W W W W W W W W H W tV r 0 %0 CO V 0% Ln A W N r Z r 0 C) r r r r r r r r r r r r r r H c) x .0 .0 %0 %0 '0 .0 %0 '.0 .0 .0 .0 '.0 '.0 %0 .0 x t'l .0 '0 "0 .0 .0 .0 .0 '.0 %0 .0 %0 .0 '0 %0 %0 tli C) w w w w w w w w www w w cd w C) 74 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ 74 o o o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 La w w w w w w w www w w w w0 N. N. N. \ N. N. \ \ \\\ \ N. N. \ a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H %0 .0 %0 .0 .0 '0 .0 .0 %0 .0 %0 %0 %0 %0 '0 C) V) H CP] 0 7y x 010 -CO to 74 Ki r H 70 to to N-Co -CO'Cl) V V t/)03t/)to 'Cl)N) to{A'Cl)'Cl) -co to .- . iA'Cl) .CO t/) H W 4) -CO t/) 4, -Ps N N .0 '.0 W W r r W W V r . r N N 0 0 W (..) . 4, 0 w to 0, CO V+ V. 4, 4, 0'. 0% 1� . r r 0% 0% V+ VI VI Ui 0 0 Co CO 0 0 0 0 � c'. 0% 00 00 00 ww Ln UI 00 HH 0000 0o v. v+ c. 0% 00 1z-3 %0 '0 00 00 00 tV t., 00 00 NI F.3 0000 00 4, 4, V V 00 * * * * * * * * * * * * * r N • 74 71 x x x x o 0 0 G) ►,y t=7 d d 0 Z a 0 0 C+1 Cxl 0 0 0 a H 9 r Cil Q 7d '=i Z H �C! C �Cf x '=J Cxf 7C .0 Z Z H ti f7' Z Z 7d 7'tll Z o d a w P r r zzz CTI 'A H 0 .0 Cl) 0 r!, 0 r PI 0 C H H H 7o Cl) Z C 1-3 CO Po Z H PI H 000 0 a Cl) Z 0 PI 0 a z Z t~ � PIPI PI R' H Pi CI Pi 1-4 canPzi fti 0 0 tri '.0 a 'v hi En a H C) C) C) a o 00 ►v O O C O O o O z z z G7 Cif H 0 H H r 'ri '=f H r C '=i '=i '31 r 'ii 3c1f x H til CI hi H Ca PI PI C�1 H r 'Cif X Cl) PI X r 7d Pi 7y H H Cl) C�1 a a En cn til a \ C=7 PI PI a H z CO z C) C) H H Z C) Cl) z z z C) Z G) H C7 H rl H H Z Z H 1-4 0 Cii Cil 0H Z 47 Cl) 0 C/) C C a a C VI \\\ C Cl) Pm. C) H r r H H Cn ti VI C, t• 70 H H H H H Cl) C) C) C) 1-3 b H Z H H Cl) En Z H H xxx H 'v CO hd '-3 N N C=i Cx7 H Cif PI 0 0 0 CPI r L-4 H PI 7d Pi Cif Co Z 0 0 0 Cl) H 7o H 0 H 0H HHH Cl) 0Hz En CEn Cl) En a En CA H H H zzz H H H zzz o 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 000 0 0 0% 0 La CX) 03 r Ln r 03 w w H Co r tV H Z a H N N 0% Co w u+ w r r V. t..3 tV r 0% tv 0 0 r Vi V w r r r r 0 w N H X 0 • c) I I I I I I I I I II I I I CO 0 4, w w t, A r w 4, 4, 4, 4, w *' PI q N F W W N .. W W W W A N In La 4, V V H H V w '0 .0 '0 V r tv r H 0 V V 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 .a` 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 r 0 0 o r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V VZV 4, V -4 .4 V V V V -4 .t V 0% " N IN .0 tv I, tV r r r H r r r tV 0 V' 0'. � N r 0 %0 Co Co Co V 0% VI CO H 0 til 0 L w o Ca 7y b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% co x x x x x x x x xxx x x x x a CD r w 0 C) x o ND CD Z N UI v+ 1 . A F A H N r 0 CO v O. v+ A Z C'1 0 C) HH rrrr Hr-HHHHHHHHH r H H r r r 0 x .p .o .0 .o .0 .0 .o .0 1/40 .0 .0 •0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .o .o .0 .o x Cil .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 •0 .0 .0 .0 1/40 .0 .0 1/40 1/40 1/40 1/40 .0 .0 VD W '0 W n x 4D Co wwcaw wwwwwwwwww w w w \\ \\\\ \\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7d Lo w w w w w w w w w co w w w w w w w w w w w 0 CTI 0• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 H � O . O . 0 '0 .O .o .o .O •0 .O . .D .D .O .D .O .D .0 •O .D •O H til C") 7d Cil CI .N -CO -CO <A 7C 7 HH NN 7C -CO -CO {!) -CO - ' < - -CO H <A <A H <A O. <A -CO -CO H N <A<A <A<A H H O. O. <A <A H H <A <A v. UI -4 <A O. H Co <A <A <A . .- -CO rn r -4 H H w -4 -4 -4 O. O. CM O. O. rn w w r r 0 La -4 O\ N 1/40 -4 - -4 CO O. w H 0 0 Ln v+ w 1/40 H Ln v+ v+ lr 0 0 N N N N r H Z L� 0 . V O. J V J N CO 1/40 Ln -P. 0 H OD w O. . -) V O. O. 0 0 -4 V -4 -4 N N H 7d O. O O\ -4 H N) N N .P.• -P. 0 0 Ch w -I co LA J ." cr. O. (..>)F w 0 0 H* X' H H I-,* 0 0 r i(. 7F * N XXXX XXXXXXX XXX Fry��y HHHH HHHHHHHHHH Cil C) H '" H ZZzZ 00000070000 H 0 00 7C 0 .r)u ZZZZ tzt E E E E E E E E E E 7 .a til ril ril til til Czl Cil til til Cil 0 [ r+ H w Pt b C) 0 C] C) V) V) (11 V) V) V) V) Ci) V) V) 0 til Cil Cil H H 0 0 0 0 H H H H H H H H H H C/) rC Cil ti) r-' 00 IR R a) ti, tz, tuwt� et, trrCs, al L, z z a ;a Pil .xl COOOOOOCaa H a ril0 ril VI V] Cn V] C/] V) Cn U) X H a C a Cn Z 0 rorororororohirororo Cl) H H H b 00 C < 7d 7' o m 7d pim 7d m 0 ''d 'b Cro. rC 0 til 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PI C7 t7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 0 C7 17 H FC V) V) V) Cn V) V) V) (I) V) V) [aa [il C• il H Z C) XX brobro 0000000000 ril 'b 0 ril txl rd 00 7d 7d 7d 7' rd ro rd ro ft rd rd rd ro ra .0 7d 0 .0 .0 7:1 H H 0 0 0 0 til til t=l til Cil [=7 Cil til [il Cil C 0 Z C C 0 'o PV Cid) CCa CC/) CCa H H H H H H H H H H 3C Ci) N M X Ci) tri ril Cr) C/) Cl) C/) HHHHHHHHH H tri Cl) tri til Cil Cl) as H H H H ZZZZZZZZZ4 Z H Z z Z H C7 ril Cil 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H ZZZZ Z C0 H H Z Vim) VI VI Cn V) V) V) V) V) V) V) a ra, C) � � ta" ta' ta' r aaaa. aaaaaa r H Q, Q, IV b ro ..0 b 1-1:1IV ro rd hl C) H H ti) V) V) Cn b b b It b rd b b b ro CCL-4 ri V) 0HH � V rrrir4VI rri) HHHHHHHHHH 'XI 0 til Cil 'Pi H Cb CO C C C C [=l til Cil Cil Cil Cil CT) Cil til ril C t l Z Z H Z H H CI C) C) C) V) N V] V) VIC) H Z Z 0 C) CI til Ci) til [ilC C] O tri z z Cn Cn V) Cn C/) ril by v.) H N CA H Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. O. 0 0 0 00 z a -..1 .P. -C•• HHH . C' . HH •ow N N A A A co c> HN HNNN H -4ODNAH0. UIHH H H N .- v H C C) Hr ro• rr HI + F+ HHHHHHH N N H ~' I I X O i I I I I II i I I i i I I i I 1 t F .- 1C 1 1 F .. 4 , A A . A A A A � til C N N w w w w N N N N N N N N N N VI w w N N w 7d Z N N H H H H H H H H H H H H H H v+ H 1/40 r r H N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0000 0000000000 0 0 0 00 0 0 H 00 0000 0000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O La w N N N N w w w w w w w w w w w w w w N N 0 A .O 1/40 .D 1/40 w w w w w w w w w w vt N H 0 OD �l H 0 Cil z 0 z Rb t" o til b P3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 00 X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 9 r r C') C) x v A V A 9 A 9 A 9 A V A 9 A 9 - 9 V A 9 - V A N Z O\ O. O. O. O1 In In In U V+ In V, H L•3 Ni H 0 .o Co .) 01/4 v, 4' w Z t" 0 a H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H C) x .o .0 •0 .0 .0 .o .0 .0 .0 .0 .o .o .0 .0 .o .o x trl .D .O .0 1/40 1/40 1/40 1/40 .0 .0 1/40 1/40 '0 .0 .D .0 .0 CTi 0 L.) w w w w w w c..) L.) w w w w w w w 0 7C \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 7C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;v w w w w w wwwww w w w L.) w w C C=1 \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ a c) O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o o 0-3 H .D .o '0 .O .D .0 .0 .O .0 1/40 .0 .0 1/40 1/40 1/40 .O CTi V) H [Ti a PC x Eli •C/3•C/3 4> a Co 0) to to H V) <A <n v) 7C 'r1 H H Ni Ni Co w V, V, w PO . </) <I) - </)</I N V) </) V) <A V) H 0 0 Ni Ni Co CO 1/4.0 1/40 A Ni v <A 0' O. V) <I) w w Ni Ni V)V) 1/40 .0 <I) </) . 0 0 .0 .o <n <n to In 0 0 0 .0 Co Co L.) 0 L.) w as a. .L, 4, H H H H H H 0 O. O. CO 0D 00 Co v J 0 0 w J w In w w In In 0 0 Co 03 In In Ni Ni In V, C~ w w In In O. a. A Ni Ni to Ni V, V, A v � v 0 0 .L, 4 0 0 4- 4, 0 0 H 4' 4- ....1 ,..I w w 0 0 to v, w Ni a. 0 03 4, 4, 0 0 w w 0 0 v, In 0 0 * * * * * * * * * * * * H Ni PC) 0 O O O O O O Z 0 0 Z Z H 0 H V) Cr1 V) V) V) V) Cn b C H \ .o 1 G) O H CTi z O V) H V) .o P:) PZI H DC C/) X X X X X H w Cl) C 7d V) R'' R', Q'' Q'1 Q'' 'Ti b H tli H VI VI aaaaa Crr1 H H .o tC MI H� C/) C V) v0) V) CC/) CC/) a 0•3 a t� H < •• C7 > C9,) a 0 0 0 0 0 cnn tri Cr) 0 anano a d o c) rri 74 Z `n ro zzzzz r) 7:$ �' 7y 0 a a 0 n O rTi PcH Z 0 HH X 0 VI w 01:1 11:1 071 ro 0 C 0 Cr) e/ 0 0 ro ,o C :V PO P:1 1 0 H ,O 0 Z 0 b H CTi 0 H 0 0 0 0 z H 0 C CT) H Z 70 CTl H C• 'Ti 'TI 'ri 'Ti H C' H V) O 'Ti O ",d b C7 CTi CT1 CTi Cr1 H H b Z CTI C H H X H cn C/) V) C/) z H a X jJ til a H CI Z V) V) V) C/) G') rC VI d Cr) X C' Z Z G) H H H H CTi z Z t71 Cr) cn 0 H 0 0 0 0 2 Cl) H Cr) 0 Cr) Z z z z z a Cr) 0 C' VI V) CilH r'r ' C- r' aaaa �` c [210 a Cl) H Pd rz3 Cn V) V) En H b H HZ CT1 tr1 CTf CTf pe H a 0 1-33 CTI C C C C as Cr) r t0-' o Cn HHHH a cm c) a triz ''s.. Z tT1CMrlitil a V) C/3 V) V) Cr) H z H z rn 0 0 rn 0 0. 0 0 O. 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 LA 4, w Ni H as .) r v, .0 4. 03 A w Co .) Z a .0 Ni w H Co 0 w H N H Ni A 4' H H H q C') N .4' H Ni H Ni H H H H .) 0 H w o H x a I I I I I I r r r r r r r - Ni r Ni 4- tri 0 VI Ni Ni In N w w w W 1' w N Ni 4, H w x, Z L.) H H v, w H H H H .0 Co H r w ..1 .0 1-3 0 v, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UI v, 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0, O O O O H O 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 O 0' 0 0 O 0 Z .) -4 '4 '4 .4 '4 '4 -4 O. "4 -4 -4 C 4' A � 4- 4, 4- A A 4, 4, 4, w w w w 0 O. V, 4, w Ni H H H H H 0 .0 01/4 03 -1 H a r=1 z 0 z R 'v a) 0 Cx) pl b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z 0, x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x (t, a r• ,,,, C) C) .p.. .p. tv NI x) O V � ra rs) .p. .. 4:, CC)) rn rn rnH J J W N F-. 0 'D Ca J O' v+ Z ri 0 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H x h7 H H H H H 'D 'O 'O 'D 'O 'D 'O 'O 'O 'D 'D 'O co co co 'D •D 'D 'D'D 'O 'O 'D 'D 'O 'D 'O 'O 'D D tr) C) � 'D 'o ' •D •D 'D 'o U) 'D W W W W w W CO W W W W w w w O Pq \\ \\ \ CO ..............\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ PC 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %d LO wwwwwwww CO w LO LO LO \ 9 \\ \\ \ \ \\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ H O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H'D [r) 'O 'O 'O 'O 'D 'D 'O 'O 'O 'D 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O1-3 t=1 C) X x CII C) <" if> n LAH H H <n- <n <n <I) <n <n 1� N 'O CO -Cl) <A </) -c/a<I) Ln </)<p<l) H <n <I) )- <I> v> -co -Cl) <n 0 0 v) <n <n-co </)<n 'D O CO C\ W W N Na F 4> r .L- to 4> O' A 'D 'D Ln LI' O' O\ r H 4> 4> H H O O O O' O to to Ln W W On W v+ W O tJ W r CO C' O' O O v+ v+ r r CO CO u' Ln Z O O H N 'D O O O O W O' 'D O' r O' O' 03 O\ A O O O O O' O' CO Co 0 0 -3 O O v+ H O O O O 'O J w J J J J 'D J M3 N C> C> CD O W 00 O H Yr * N V1 C) cn En Cl) cn Cn cn En En En V) VI cn Cl) � o 71 t ro roro oo h x z Z H Cd VD H t• 0 o z x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl) o 0 H w l 2 ,1:1 :1 )-c1 ro ro II) )71 ro 1-0 )1:1 01:1 171t' til tri Cr1 C=1 Cr7 t21 C+7 Cr1 Cr1 C21 Cr1 Cr) Cr) CT) C) izi Cl) tri H y Cr] CII Cr7 Cr7 Cr7 Cr1 Cr7 Cr7 C37 CICr"' Crr) VO H H V) V) 0V) V) VI V) 'r1 "C 9 C) C V) V) 0 H C4 C=1 Cr1 tri Cr) Cr1 tr1 Cz7 0 Z tri 7C ZZ Crl NO o 0 � Pi rroXXPiisXPiX X 'id CC t-' Z cc Z CIcccccccc C7 d X d HHHHHHHH ro V) H , . Cl)) 0 01 ` 1-3 CO O 01 CO CM Cr1 C21 Cr1 Cr) CT1 Cr) Cr) tr1 0 `D N V) En Cn VI V) V) En Cl) ON Z• z 'O3 N 00 Om Al Al ro ro ro Cr) C C C C C Q C O rr7 ro w o w 0 .0 H H H H H H H H .0 %v C '-s, X IT, H H H H O C HHHHHHHH Q0 tH' r CI H tri to tI ' t Z Z 'r7 H t' t " t-' C-' C" t• C4 C7 X X H H CII hi HHHHHHHH ''d CII C7 H H v) % H H H H H H H H X CO H -3 H H X C) Z Z Cn tr) '-C +-C 'C rC 0-C 'C 'C +-C Z H Z z Z Z C7 +� \\3 1-1 Z H Z Cil to cn V) fl) cn VI Cn H 0 Cl) o O V) tr1Z 11:1 'Id Z Cr1tr7tr7tr7tIItri til Cr1 Z Cl) C) V) C) CO � r cccccccc r CO H t' C' H HHHHHHHH H b Z b H VH ) H H Cl) Z 00000000 Z Cn Cn CII H tri tr1 [z) tr1 Cr1 Cr7 Cr) tri X X Pi C21 tH 1--I Hx1 Pi H H H Z Z L-11 0 H Cl)H Cl) Z 0 G) II Z CCC) Cr) Cl) Cr) [r1 Cl) .0 .0 0O' 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 00 Or Z a CO CO H O' W W r r W r A W ON O' A N, -P- N.) N Z C) O 0 W H H H CO CO N CO N H N N A H H r O' C) O O r r N r N r H H H N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I H H I I II td 0 � til C� 0 0 La A F L La La A L A A ND W W W W W W W COW N W In N W N � H O O W W H N Ch CD 00 CD 00 C) C) CO A r N H J J "' 0 H O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O O O W N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O O O O 0 O 0 O O H O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 Z O O O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 J -4 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J -4 A A In In In In In In LI' In V+ In In V+ Ln LAP. W LA 0 'O CO J H J J CO CO O' V' P. C) CII z O z R ,-0,d O tri TI w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 Z CD Q X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x a r O. 0 C) rr r J` r .- r 0o v -.I --I -.I .J H 0 mD CO O. v+ z r 0 0 H H H H H H H H H H H r r H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H C) x .D .D .DmD V) mD mD m) Va vD V) .D .D .D '.0 '.0 '.0 '.0 1/40 vD m) V0 .0vD .0 .o .0 .DmD q) x tri .0 .0 .o .o .0 .o .o .o t0 .0 .o .0 .D .o .a .0 .D .0 .0 .o .o .o .o .a .o .o .0 .D .o .D r+1 c) W W W W Co W Co W W W W W Co W Co W W W W W W W W Co W CO W W W W 0 7C \\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \\\\\ \ \\\\\.\\\\\\ N 00000000000 0 0 00000 0 00000000000 ;d W W W W W W Co W W W W W W W W W Co Co CO W W W W W W W W W CO W C7 rr1 \\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \\\\\ \ \\\\\\\\\\\ a 0 00000000000 0 0 00000 0 00000000000 H H .D .D .D .D .D t0 .D .D .0 .D .D .O .D .0 .D .0 .D .D .0 .D .a .D .D .0 .0 .0 .0 .D .D .D til to H tz1 c) W X to N 0 <n <n H <n 7C '4 H H 0 H N <n <n <o <n -co - - - <0<n </><n - </><n<I) v> H <0<I><0 H <n <n <na> <n O. <I>-V3 F. F. H <I) <0<0 <nv> O 00 W W .0 . N W F W H W <n <n - • tr A 4, v H Na co O. <n o0 co N N %.I H H H Lo CO H H 00 ,I O. CO to Ja O Ln CO Na H 0 F. H O %.I .0 W --I N v O O O CO 00 co .D .D W 00 Co CO .O H CO O. 0 W 0n .D H H to Cl O v .J .D N O 0'. .J O to -I O O W W H .- H J` J` 0. O O to 00 H .0 0' 4, O rn to Ln H to H 4, N J D. .0 W 00 00 00 H to to A .- .D Na .J .D r v O O 0 v -.4 Cm H W H Co -4 .D Na * * * * * H N C Cl Cl Cl Cl 0 Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl H cn to to to to cn to to to to m to to to to m N E H H H H H H h1 h1 hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi H to to to to Cr) to cn cn v) cn to to H 9 C C C C C C C C C C C .D 2 il ii CC n C) C) C) C) Cl C) C) C) C) C) .0 11 tt4 r4 t4 V4 CI V4 11 11 tl Al r C) C) to cn cn v) v) r W to to to to to to In to to to to C H C) H H H H H H H H H H H 9 ,HC r r r r r Z .D CI n C7 C) C] C) () C7 n n C) t'7 t=1 tri trn to to C 00000000000 0 rC 'rl 03 . > > > H tT Na MM iso M is M M M M M M FA H H H H H Cl 0 5d 0 CD CD CD CD H :d H W 0 rn z Po C H z 0 H H H H H H H H H h1 g O to Co 170 Co to to C) Cl C C C C C C C Cl C Cl tr1 tri t4 t=1 t=1 tr1 t4 tl t=1 ;d H by Cl C CCC C H H H H H H H H H H H rr r r r r r r r 0 cn m H H H H H H O H H H H H H H HH H H t4 til t4 t4 t4 t4mf4t4 'x1CD r rrrrr rrrrrrrrrrr hi hihdhlh) rohihlhlrrlrrl C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 HHHHHHHHHHH CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC to r H H H H H H H C) H H H H H H H H H H H O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O to r H 2 2 2 2 2 2 rt, rC r4 rC rC rC r4 rC rC rC rC 222222222H > 2 C) 0 C) 0 0 0 9 t4 trl t4 m 14 t4 t=) m V4 O 2 C) N cn to to to to to to to to to to tr1 9 o cn e� W W W W Po W Po W W W n r C C H H H H H H C C C C C C C C C C C 7d W ''d 2 2 2 2 2 2 b H H H H H H H H H H H H cn h1 H H H H H H 9 CD 0 C) 0 C) 0 C) 0 C) CI CI h! Po H a r4 r4r4r4t4 til r4tri t4 tri tri H a tin to o H VIz C) rn Cl) 0 o O o 0 o o o o o. O O O 00000 .D 00000000000 HHWJ` HHHHHNH W r Hc. WHH Co W 4% La rnHHrnrnJ` OmLa Z9 O. In W H ".I Na H U) 00 H Na H CO CO Na Na Co Co A Na N H N 0o 0) N N N N In C, C) HHHHHHHHHHH N H FOUHNH O HHHNHNOOO. ,IJ` - `.i.' C.) I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CZ 0 4% 4` 4% 4% 4% 4` 4, 4% 4% 4, 4% J` 4% 4` 4% 4% 4` N J` rrr .r` .r - - - - ` rn C W W W W W W W W W W 4% N Na N N N N N) N) W W W W co W W W W W co "DC7 2 Na N Na N) Na Na N Na N H W H W W W W W W H CO CO Co Co CO CO CO CO Co Co CO H H H H H H H H H H 0 0 0 0 00000 0 00000000000 00000000000 0 0 00000 .D 00000000000 00000000000 O 0 00000 .J 00000000000 H 00000000000 0 0 00000 to 00000000000 Z �1 -.I .J �I ..I �I �J .J v �I ,I �J V ,I ,I %.I .J .J ,I -.I %4 -.! �I �I ,I .J ,I J �J �J G' O. 0' Ch O. ON O. 0' 0. O. O. cn 0' O. to Ln Ln to to to to Lm LA to to to to to to to 0 to LA In LA N to to In to to to W 0 .D .a .D .D .D v - v v v v v -4 v v V H C) tln z 0 2 g ,"0 0) O r7 PC b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 00 a t-4 _... ��z =� ,r._. . n C') M 0 4' 4- 4' - 4- 4, - V - V .- V 9 V . x O H .O .0 st3H -4 O\ U' . co N co 0 Z r LO N H J rn v+ O n H H H H H 1-' H H H H H H H H H x = H .Ho .0 � '0 � .0 .D .0 .0 .0 .0 .o .o .o .0 [Ti 0 MI .o U) `a .o U) 4> U) w w w w w w w n 7C .0 .o .o \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\\\�\ 7% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :d O o 0 o W w L.> C,) www w L.> U> t7 ril H 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H H H H 00 up 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 '0 .o .o .o .o [r7 H 0 0 0 `D �O VO tri n x tri n 4> {n W W N PC U> - <A<A <A <A <A H <A<A - - <A {A N <I) <A <A .0 .0 Ca to A ..p- <A<A <A<A H H N<A H <n<A . - .- <A <A . H H H H N O. H Co CO w co CO 03 U> W W W 0 0 H H H V+ V+ H H w w w O H H .o N O O 4, J J 0 0 0 0 0. Cr., O. O. W W .o 1/40 0 V+ V+ N N N N a. C» .- N W .0 N Z 0 '.0 L0 %o .o CA Co w w 0 0 4, A H H 0 0 0 VI V+ CO Co H N 0 H W J H H M 0. O. 0. V+ V+ H H N N 0 0 A .- V+ V+ 0 0 0 O 0 O O .0 W H J H H O. H * * * * * * * * * * * tri ti n 9 N N C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 o r 9 '-d H '9 '9H H H Cl) C/) Cl) Cl) Cl) C/) C/) HG7 cm H r C C C E E E U) n n C=1 tml Cl) Cl) Cl)C0 Cl)VCl)omCl)rCCA Cl) Cr/ 70 0 Z 0 ''y %� Cl) H H H H H H H 0 Z Cl)ro H H r '3 n n n n ud n n C M H C n 0 C9) 7d0 C O O O O O o C=7 N rri H IA n tri CTI z H Pi Pi * H H H H HH La 0 Z „+ z Ca C/) VI 7d C ro tr7 VI n tli tri 0 0 n n ro ro H H H H H H M .0 H 9 .0 .0 H ro 0 0 iv 0 [xi t+7 C=i Cr[z�7 [17 to 0 H Z C H 'Z 'Z 'O Cl) M tr=7 [[4 tl7 trl7 tri t� H 9 Cori ' 'dd H 7:i 7:1 � 0 xxxxxx VI CCli ) 77 CCTi CC�i hC H � CCTi En CII 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z H ZZZZZZ C H Z N H Z Z Cl) 0 n n O tri Cr7 to tri tr7 [xi � CI tri Cli Z n 9 � C Cl) � c\n r � ✓ H ro txiM a tri c H 0 0 H H CO z Z H rCA \� H Z E tr7 Z Z H H n n n rri En Ell El En H H Z H H zz 0 0 •o .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 9 CA CA W 1W-' N N N CO N A CO N N N H n H H H H H H H v+ H H N H H 0 H X n N W i0 0 H H H I + , , + + + CA 0 A VI H H F r A WWW ) H VI H H N) NCH C..1 W ca W W W W 71 z H J J 0 0 CO H � %0 H N N N N N N N H 0 0 N J 0 0 0 0 O O 00 H H H H H H O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 -4 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 0 J 0 0 0 J J J J J J J J J J < 0 0 0 J J J -.4 a. a. a\ O. c1 a. a. o. a. 01 0 co 0' U' 10 a` -4 N A Vf ..n V+ V7 V+ .T H -4 Q\ V+ .D J O. H H n tri z 0 z Pro to o t11 P:, Ts ro H H H H 0 ro ro ro ro x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 0 CD r 03 C) 0 - L LnaVIv . .- .- ND 4-4, VI Z O O 0 0 .D .D .D .D .D .D FA W N I-' 0 .D CO v O\ Ln 4- Z r 0 0 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H C) x .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D x rrl .v .O .D .D .D .D .D .D .O .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D r'i C) W 1.) W L4 C4 w w C.) w C.) w w w w w w w w l.) w CJ w C) 7C R\\\\ \ \\\\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\\\ 7C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pi w w w w CO w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w d rrl � "5% ���� �� �� � �"5% a C) H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 00000 0 0000 0 00 0 00 0 0 0000 rr1 V) H [II o 'rd x rxi <n </> <n H <n v> <n<n <n <n <n H H <n <n 7C 'r1 N tV H -4 CO Co Co Co .o H CO A 4, H H 77 N N H <n </> O 0 -) </> H O\ .D V> <n -I -I .D Na N -4 O �I Co Co Na Na <I) -Co to</> CJ to W N Na -4 O. N Na O\ 0) CO O. O. .D N N v Ln N Co Co Co CO 4- <n H N <A 0 CO CO N Co N H H H G) V O 0 In lr O. .0 -I H H .D In W .- 4, N N C..' -4 H C) -I Cl Z O O O O O O O A Ch N O. O O O C.I. A O O. O. .L In 00 O O In In A W O N v y 'i O O O O 0 0 O Co 0 0 0 Co 0Yr 0 H. N .D n In v v 0 O 0 O H* * * . O N -I O`* * H N tri tzl c) P:1 rri tri tri tri 'z3 77 O VIV) ran vai 9- .HD '8 b b b b r17 0 C7 Cd Cd C) .0 ,O H H v1 '< H H H H .D t0' t0' t0' t0' t0' t i 'rd ro 'rd 'ted 0ril C4 9 a R5 o z z z z cn En w rrr- rr C HHHH a HH C7 00 00000 a H HH rrl trim! Z Z H H H H H H 0 0 0 0 H rri C4 V) rri C7 C7 Ci C7 .D H H H H H O 'r1 'rl 'rl '4 O H d tl C) 77 ;n ',d 7d C 0 0 0 0 0 77 7c, Co r37 0 Cri V1 x 0 4" r~ Or C rrl N ZZZZZ ro Pt ro b Z a s Z c c tri 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 H Cl Cl Cl rr1 z z C Z C7 C) C) C) C) C) Z W W to b7 'C 7C 74 0 0 V1 0 ZZZZZ C) rrrr C ftioi H H 77 H H H H H HHHHr/) V) Z ;d Pir r r r Pi Pi Pi P:1 " " " " En c) 0 ' a a a a 9 9 9 CO CO 0 0 H 000067 '4 '4 'r) n7 'dro O z z z z z ren r4 r4 r4 h7 C4 Z CD 0c 'e '0c r< 'Hc 'ye 'Hrg r4 r4 e ril r4 r4 rri rri td X X X X CD 'r1 'ry td 0 Cd rrl C) 0 0 0 0 ,0 ,o ,o ,o .0 C 0 0 0 0 o H H Cl C11 C4 ,0 'd b b 'd Cl Cl Q C H H H H H Z O H H b b C O [4 Crl Cr] r4 H H H H H r-+ 0 0 0 0 'r19 r O 0 H • 'r1 rro tithd 'd "0 ti 7d777dPC 'd d V) V) 'd a as a H H H X C) H H H H rrl r4 rr1 VI r17 Z '_! 'ri '17 ft) r4 rt) 'C Z H H rr1 H H H H ZZZZZ 0 Cl 0 C C Z tI > 0 V) V) z Z Z Z Z t1 H H H H H V) r4 rrl rri r=1 C) H td V) H E O O O O C4 rrrr r17 0r 0 V)V) V) v) rn rrl >a >- a VO v) v) VI V) C) H H H H H Q+ Q+ Q'' a- C) a a 'd 'd hi 'd hiH zzzzz x COCO a Fdroro 'd 'd H H H H H r r r r o hi r r H< r r r r H tri tri Crirr7rrl O, C. 00 0 a rrlrri a HHHH H zzzzz COISI ed MI t-4 'e a7 rrl t 1 F t71 0 a a a a a 77 W 77 77 \ a C' V) v) rn V) z z z z z z H H H H HCO;v rrl rri L-4 C4 r=1 z z z z F - + tri VI VVI CO VI H z 0 0 0 0 0 O. 0 0 0 0 0 .D .D O. .D .D 0 .D 0 0 0 0 CO H A W 4- Na -I O. 4- to H CO CO N CO CO C.> 00 W C) 4- H Z a H "4 H W Na H H Na N) H O. H H H A i H 4- l.) Na H �IC) H H H H O. Na H H H H H 0 0 N 0 0 W O H H H O. X 0 i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I c CO O 4% 4% 4, A A 4- A A A A A Na N A N N 4, N A .A A 4, r4 Cl N N N Na Na In N N N N (.a H H In Na N In Na Na Na N Na Pi Z 4% 4% 4, 4, 4% Na Na Na Na Na .D -I -4 Na 0 0 In H H H H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Na N N 0 C.) H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 o H H 0 0 0 r .D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 O 4- 4- O 0 0 O. O. 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 O -I -I O O 0 .0 Ln 0 0 0 0 Z 0 0 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -I 4- 0 0 0 0 < .D `D .D .D `D N .D .D .D .D .D 00 CO CO Co CO CO 0o Co 0 N N N N N �I H H H H O .D Co O v -4 v J H 0 rt Z 0 z R Ni Oa o VI Pc 'o P) HHHHH H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H Z OQ hi hi h7 h7 'd b b h7 'd AO b 'd hi 'v 'd d 'd b 'v b b 'd Q fD a r .D C) C) x 0 U' 9 � 9U, 9U 9U' 0 0 0 0 0 H CO -7 O. U' .' Z r+ o C) r r r r r r r H H o x .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .o .O x C=7 .O .O .o .O .D .D .O .O .O n x N w w w w w w w w o0000 0 0 0 0 7d wwwww w w w w Cy rxi �.......-�....... a H H H H H H H H H H HH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C=7 H VI x rxl to to ti) t/)N C) Cr.) to to to to H H H H 7C "h 0 A N N O O H N to /) N t/) J J o CO O. O. N N to H -.1 H N) to to N In V+ O. O. A . 01 O. Co 0 0 N In �l N O. 0 O. O. N.) N 4) w 0 0 CO Z H .O A A U J v N N) v J J N N) 0 H J N O. 0) O. 0 N) w v' H H V„LA 0 H N '< PC "C •C )-C C 'b a H C) 'x7 C113 xacxx w � � cncn � H P:$ VI C0 Cil C0 VI C.1 x .O xxxxx •;) le 0 el• E E H ci) d 0 0 C) C) f) C) C0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 C 0 e z H broroill b 4t 1-3 VI VI til VI rzi r 0H ri o Cs7 H H H H H H Cl) HHHHH H C c) ZZZZ ' Cl) e 0 c) 0 c) 0 tri Q C C C Q C-4 H H H • b b b b C/) 0 Pt b b 11:5 ,T1H L-4r H r H H H H H H H H C 0 C=7 C/7 C=7 C=7 VI H Z N C/) O C=7 C/) 0 0 0 0 0 .O 0 COO H O` A H H H H Z H H H H .1 H N C rHHrr 0 t.71 0 II CO o I I I I I ' no w � z A A A N N3 H H H H H H H H H 0) 1-3 H 0000 Co H0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co o O 0000 H 0 r O. 0 0 0 0 0 .- O. H 0 0 0 0 0 v 00 v w Z 00 0 0 0 0 0 .O .O .D .O 10 .O 1, A A w H C) C=7 z 0 z IV CO 0 Cxl b 00Q HHHHH H H H H Z fD Id 'vhdroho ro ho ,-0 hO a H r-' O _ • hi hi hi 'xi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi n 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C C 0 0 d 0 0 Z z z z z z z z z z z z z c C) 0 0 C7 0 C7 t3 0 0 t, :, 0 0 Z 0I-Ir CO co CO - - r r r r r .- r 0 0 1-- W F-• W r W W W N N N I– 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 C3N 2, W v, r 0 r r rxi n x t=i O hi cn cn r r r C7 n b H 0 Ci) H 9 H a •o '.O '.o cn 0 H <PZi L-' 0 Z NO '.o '.O P. ro Z O H 0 Z H H W N r Z H O HC t 0 H X X C) b tt'Pi H Itt ►C b b b t=i h7 Cn ..4 "H,d po H Cn 0 0 0 n 0 P C c Z rn < < < a Cal < z 1-3 H >Cn t 0 Z tli Z b hi t=7 d '=i rn 70 z d z P CI d H H H O r N r W to W to to to to to to to o. r to to 00 Co to to r to r CO NO O W v+ O V O r N vi ON ON 2, Q" •• W N N ON CO N F-' to Co N ON Co �! N N ON F--. W VO CO 1-, �! ON O O W O ON O+ v+ O VO 0 to UI VI Cm Co W •0 N 0 V+ r VO 0 ON In c. 'D W CO 2, 0 N N W v . 0 Q\ 0 0 A 2, N CO O\ N In O'. * b Co OQ N r Iic MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Cler]c(� RE: Application For Premises Pei it - American Legion DATE: March 12 , 1993 INTRODUCTION: The Shakopee American Legion has submitted an application for a premises permit for the Rock Spring Supper Club, 1561 East 1st Avenue. BACKGROUND: The Shakopee Lions Club currently has a premises permit for the Rock Spring Supper Club through July 31, 1993 . City Council approved this premises permit in 1991. (They also have a premises permit for Dangerfields. ) The Lions Club has discontinued selling pull tabs at the Rock Spring Supper Club. The American Legion has been asked by the Rock Spring Supper Club to sell pull tabs. The American Legion is interested in obtaining a premises permit for the Rock Spring's (through the remainder of the Lion's licensing period - until July 31, 1993) and until their licensing period expires on March 31, 1994. The American Legion also has a premises permit for their facility at 1266 East 1st Avenue. (All premises permits for one organization expire on the same date. ) Before the Gambling Control Board will approve a premises permit, they must receive a resolution of approval from the local governing body. Assuming that City Council would not want to approve two premises permits for the same establishment, I asked the American Legion to provide correspondence from the Lions Club stating that they no longer wish to be licensed and have discontinued selling pull tabs at the Rock Spring. If the correspondence is available before Tuesday night's meeting, I will place a copy on the council table. I spoke with a representative from the Gambling Control Board and learned that more than one premises permit can be issued for the same location. The lease for the space where the pull tabs will be sold must be different for each premises permit. This is the second time the City of Shakopee has been asked to approve more than one premises permit per location. The VFW asked for a premises permit for Cheers 2 Ya. This application was tabled on March 2nd because the VFW had not obtained a letter from the current licensee stating that they no longer wished to sell pull tabs at Cheer's 2 Ya. City Council may wish to adopt a policy limiting premises permits to one per establishment. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt resolution approving premises permit (providing a correspondence is received from the Lion's Club by Tuesday's meeting) . 2 . Table the request for a premises permit, if a correspondence is not received from the Lion's Club by Tuesday's meeting. 3 . Adopt resolution approving premises permit, regardless of whether or not a correspondence is received from the Lion's Club by Tuesday's meeting. 4. Adopt resolution denying premises permit. 5. Direct staff to prepare an amendment to the gambling regulations to limit premises permits to one per location. 6. Other RECOMMENDATION: Alternatives 1 and 5. Staff recommends that only one permit be approved per location and that approval be granted only if a correspondence is received from the Lion's Club. If received by Tuesday, a copy will be placed on the council table for Tuesday's meeting. ::..-y. : ..4. 'V-.,3L•....- 3 ifiYi. v :_.'....V.''i"..16 '� - FOR BOARD USE ONLY LG214 __ BASE# (7/29191) -_ - PP# «� � FEE _�" - Minnesota Lawful Gambling ... s�� CHECK Premises Permit Application - Part 1 of 2 INITIALS • DATE yw *: •r_ ..rte:- 4-- : 4: ,_. _ , .. .. .:..w . ::vr:.:.i?v..Sv},i�•b..: r+P'; rn.x {N ..X,}J:p:4Ui..Y:±}i:ihi.i}i.i•a'{:;•.U?.Sx::::...�v:•i.:_.w } x�:?.v:..:•iY.v.:K?v:4v::ryw:n4}?:< !?}i?:}}.•?:j?}?.j:•}nlNv.± ;±:rti.r.±}..:.n...M:..:J`F:}A..x.v?,?....:v. ,rf fF v :+?}M1�'•• .:r:.±ii.,.•::.• ±`:< .• , � ir.4? ri. i .. .. .. ��t....:. y\..:,vv?:..r:ii}}:?w.:;n?.?.?..v,,?::?v:.}r}i::r}}}w??}:{x.}}}?i?'r:..*1.•w;v:}??}i.ii}}i?(:i-i;4:�:±± r�'. nY '4:::t.2.:•::?:::::::::::-.§'<::$,:::::4::::‘,"'? . : i•:..N ::?Yf..:*„ }.,; . t .is .. „ i • s ?.. 4•;:•:4.-.S..s.:.>.> .?:•.},.,4i..rr..: }>..::.:::::.:;:..;r.,:}.:•....?.: ...,:rrrp.:+nw.i:.,ti . .i.J.,; :ry1-.:x } ;fir-:u's`.. r}:r}.:•. :. =, - - Class of premises permit - Renewal -- (check one) Organization base license number n A($400) Pull-tabs,tipboards,paddlewheels,raffles,bingo Premises permit number g B($250) Pull-tabs,tipboards,paddlewheels,raffles (l New ❑ C($200) Bingo only . - --- ❑ D($150) Raffles only xr•x.,-.•r•.v:--- n..x+..... rnv wr. ,....::.::r'-... :: rYiii: y iY v t:.,,,..:•:%: r. x x.v :i:,:s ;. . Kw:v ...... : ..vx, ... Y.: 7r � trf..•:}.-�vf. ,+?< _. ::r�:::::±:±:.. �E...�.•n�rt+wr:,. :.•::}:�:•:.'�.�J"..�.'-:.:::....-:-::?r•:.::;:,,...-a.. ..:. rrx„y^..�4�;F•. .:fi'r f... .,r�Ai g,'<(2iY�'<° 'Y• �,: i:::`?:2- ����.-? k,'�.�',Y+.:•:, j, n}y,.' '`.;psi.,, .rffi f A ?y • - : rn 3 v ..'' :•.;frr`.•h:. K7�•�!KL_1,.,�1 ir.'�rQ�KL�V�F ',y .}::?•.-}?:. .... :. .�;t� k.,- ::.4•::•.� r ...... v.:•:.�?:•.a:.�r.•.::.,:. ..... ... ... .. . Name of Organization rncr'CzV\ 1-- i O,i\--- `Y(� • D k .# �' - •• Business Address of Organition-Street or P.O Box(Do not use the address of your gambling manager) _ 1).-(46 r (S,-1 AVext ue_ — P.0, gz 26 L City State Zip Code County Daytime phone number c -ke pce_ ....V 1}Ft1,11-7,1,-.13e4170111-1, Mt) S-S31, Sc.o-tt (GIL) qq5- --5-253 Name of chief executive officer(cannot be your gambling manager) Title Daytime phone number ._ `^_ Mar--in XevC, Y Commander- ((911) 75g-33)2 44.' ` Bingo Occasions -s,:'--,! - If applying for a class A or C permit, fill in days and beginning & ending hours of bingo occasions: No more than seven bingo occasions may be conducted by your organization per week. -- Day Beginning/Ending Hours Day Beginning/Ending Hours Day Beginning/Ending Hours to to to toto ' to to - If bingo will not be conducted,check here ED - �V.KRI�• ^YHe ��..yi�i�iJr3:..::. .. /V..�..i�...i..i....L..f�.i..� •• ..n:....•..i ...•.-Y...:..4Y. :x#?.i}..�?.i.i.ii.ii..?i.:.:..:.�i.:±k:.....'..i..: mr:m::.�i..:i.•..v:.:: .n:. v 'v::?:.:ii:!}�.:.} . : } ii4: }: : J . y :' ' . :.�::......iy.-f.fJ..iiiiiii}:?i::.jtf:.:..'.r..:':o-.::.:::.::.::..*f:•�i: .ivC.::.i. i:.......::....-:.:.:....::w:::.:,.........:.:...i.............-:.i:.,:,.:}w::. ±,. i .,:�: i - . Name of establishment where gambling will be conducted .:.. _. Street Address(do not usepost office box number) t�0 Srino S� r Lb 156,1 Fr 1� hVer+ta_ ,e_ Is the premises loi ated within city trhits? LSYes O No If no,is township n organized n unorganized = unincorporated ' City and County where gambling premises is located OR Township and County where gambling premises is located if outside of city limits , S 1101a p� SGo{f Name and address of legal ownerof premises City State Zip Code • (l t 1 Gk CZvrt b-)r` .950 W' w oc.r1an&it( SA.. MO S--C37 9 Does your organization o n the building where the gambling will be conducted? = YES (NO _ If no,attach the following: • a copy of the lease(form LG202)with terms for at least one year. • a copy of a sketch of the floor plan with dimensions,showing what portion is being leased. _, _ -- A lease and sketch are not required for Class D applications. �+:4K.,v, iMii lin C 1 nle ntDo ndY its `a PO tiQX ntlmbEh< s `»::>>< :':”:»:`:<i><':':>::<; ��.- :�Yddress:of storage:::space:>of:gamb q p Address City State Zip code - 15(oL Er ls). AVfV1k-e, She*-0p�-c_ W3 S53--/ _ -_ :. k4.:.t . - • Afinnesota Lawful Gambling - .,:;...,-.;_,.:,::,,..-.,__-:::,-..,,a-4, Premise Permit Application - Part 2 of 2 .• . : ' - _ - •.K.+�,{.-..ru;yvr/,.!.vp•:a.:}n�i:°wy<;2� 5 ,.:r So:Y 'tr.4:G:;•:;g:; ':i�(�{:;:;Y,j'� .< '.�$S}t i:2t ./,,. 'YG:;..., • .mv. .r�� ..nµ a,:.,.}y,n{e:........:•J„-:•:: r•::•: :..:.,.:>. ...;.. .. ..oy.. r.$ n...o{{C:4':r.:. ...t.....:v..-..... �mbittng���Bank:>�cCoun�:Yr# mtai�an«.J}}::.J.>:.:}..{4.2:• ..2 Bank Name Bank Account Number C�kcaev�s �..�� 00- 5.7 Fr- , ti tate p ." : _ .. l <0 0 s +1— A u e,, ,,_ E . 6 ka 1-rt. rn N s'-Y-3-7 2 , _ ..<v:.v •<,,. .•:r•... .<t:.aal.�a{<.r ..t.u,..�,....;{{ •r<}•{• ..iQ�frJY KHaYFW�'''Fi"J,{G.:::-vJy%::;'{:;�: yk�rf f..2 .p, ...:.;.••tilt,fM :` .. ... ... ... ^_- �,. ..,.ts::.. .i� 'i8�1•:......:..:::.._�.,. :<a'2•::•r ';..wt:Giy3L•0G!?u^/c `?<h.M.grtSc?,.-:..;{{N �9 '�Jo�4•}�. :;t13 ii`J`'::'.`''`}� ./.,i 1r'� /i} _. . ..:.t ;v'{w st : ... ,,r.i::. K;$ ftua3s�ac:::::{:4•::....{:..w::{d•; - 3.g54r>tr,'K J,:p�'• S'} i ,r����-�'z:;:;Tr;:F rKs':.Y's«'N3'<'T� b°O[i�S: ��� .•::.:::.. ., ;:{. .. ..tM ant79 E'�9r7d1B' .....:.:,.:.{{ Title Name Addresss ,: :_ r i S-2-S.1 N ki Powa 4 L k, 12k. 6 aw.b(,,-� �1� art-cc - �ra�ci C ISGt�1 Gee v' r, - _ .,:, .0 .1-A..--Zv-\ \' 1)v 0'\"*.v.1/43 a�lg4(0 E , Cecb,-- 1_L Or. CofrA►1vnAer - CEO :.:.. r.. r J .:v: .::. :. ::. ::n r Y:Y {:r.:J:.::v; ........r ...................... ..... ........ ..x::::::•:.r....,.. r>.r::r::.:.:::::}.,:r{..:.::...: ...rrrr,:r.r::: :....:::Yrjt'{:i`!%:J.'>r;<%�!:,. ....r...;..S!{•L• .`Y'rir�.. ::/{..r,:.::::CIV.:.�:.v..{::4n\....4?OC-..4.{!.. -.:... ..:......:...... exzt. Gambling Site Authorization •1 am the chief executive officer of the organization; I hereby consent that local law enforcement officers,the •1 assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful opera-_ _ board or agents of the board,or the commissioner of -...w.- tion of all activities to be conducted; • -= revenue or public safety,or agents of the commissioners, -±' .1 will familiarize myself with the laws of Minnesota may enter the premises to enforce the law. . .L....-..,...—_ <:rt.. governing lawful gambling and rules of the board and -- Bank Records Information agree,if licensed,to abide by those laws and rules, • The board is authorized to inspect the bank records of the including amendments to them; gambling account whenever necessary to fulfill -any changes in application information will be submitted °.. requirements of current gambling rules and law. to the board and local unit of government within 10 days :. Oath of the change;and . I declare that: •1 understand that failure to provide required information •I have read this application and all information submitted or providing false or misleading information may result in • r‘_ to the board is true,accurate and complete; the denial or revocation ofthe license. ; >.,;_ ._,;;-, ,-. _-all other required information has been fully disclosed; - Signature of chief executive officer Date :Yr . .:,. t.. ..,.::. •r.:.:.. .. >< '.:Ty::vY...4;-,}.. ':,;:�.v:i - - . .. . ..t..: ... n .. ..r . . ........:: k......r.. .n.... t::v: .. ..m.:::.:., r. :Jm" r :::imrr.Nr.. r.r�:..:. •.}:i�.v ':::•:.`... ::r::::r.}:::J}:}.:-r}i.Yri:t�}: ":.:.. !.!..:... ... iii Tcarnme. t< cnotuedgemeizC ;; nw . Y4 : r:w3f +4Cg ✓-Y'l:uvf;:;%�i : . ...... .. 4. A coov of the local unit of government's resolution aa- _, 1. The city'must sign this application if the gambling prem- proyina this aoolication must be attached to this aoolication. ises is located within city limits. 5. tf this application is denied by the local unit of government, 2. The county"AND township"must sign this application if it should not be submitted to the Gambling Control Board. ti:s gambi:rg prsm'ses it!^--sated within a township. .. 3. The local unit government(city or count ) must pass ay Township: By signature below,the township acknowledges resolution specifically approving or denying this application. that the organization is applying for a premises permit within township limits. - - City' or County" Township" - •City or County Name Township Name City of Shakopee Signature of pars n- U�Yr1e ivinr /application Signature of person receiving application ,�a� ' ' " Titlet I Date Received Title I Date Received Ci� Clerk 3/9/93 - Refer to the instructions for required attachments. Mail to: Gambling Control Board Rosewood Plaza South,3rd Floor 1711 W.County Road B LG214(Part 2) Roseville, LIN 55113 ( 712SY91) RESOLUTION NO. 3764 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, APPROVING A PREMISES PERMIT FOR THE AMERICAN LEGION POST #2 WHEREAS, the 1990 legislature adopted a law which requires municipal approval in order for the Gambling Control Board to issue or renew a premises permit; and WHEREAS, American Legion Post #2 is seeking a Premises Permit for the Rock Spring Supper Club, 1561 East 1st Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: That the Premises Permit for the American Legion Post #2 at the Rock Spring Supper Club, 1561 East 1st Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota, be approved. Adopted in Session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1993 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney it look rShakopee Lions Club P.O. Box 254 • Shakopee, MN 55379 �y ! ANAT\0� March 15, 1993 To whom it may concern: • The Shakopee Lions are no longer selling pulltabs at the RockSpring. Our lease agreement expired and we did not renew the lease. cL ames J. Stree land, Jr. Gambling Manager •SuTgaaw TTounop s ,gg6iuoq Aq pazedazd aq qou pTnoo uoTgewzo;uT asuaoTT agq 'uoTgeoTTdde agp 3o uoTssTwgns ager alp oq ena ' TTounoD ALTO ag: Aq paMaTAaz aq gsnw asuaoTT SuTooggeq agy •oTTgnd agq goagozd oq uoT3oe ou axeq oq asoogo pTnoo osTe am .uo coaTToo 0.4 ginoT33TP ATSnoTzogou aze spuoq 'ATageunlzo;un •eoueznsuT 3o peagsuT puoq e azTnbaz pTnoo am 'sazTsap TTounoO ATO alp 3I • quawgsTTgelsa SuTooggeq age SuTgTSTA woz3 esti Aew gDT4M swaTgozd woz3 oTTgnd alp goagozd oq AeM aTgeuost?az e ST aoueznsuT 6uczTnbax •aoueznsuT azTnbaz qou saop sTTodeauuTW • aoueuTpzo sTTodeauuTW eq woz3 abenbueT uo paseq ST aoueuTpzo ooggeq znO •pagoequoo aq oq eAeg pInoM aoueznsuT AgTeToadS agT.M oqM sabezaxozq za6zeT alp suoTgdo pue sap-Fad zo3 qnq 'ssauTsnq Atm, _to; aTgeTTene sT aoueznsuT getp pagegs au • quawgsTTgelsa 3o adAq sTgp zo3 aTgeTTeAe sT aoueznsuT 3T zaznsuT zno paNse I ( • quasazd qe squawusTTgegsa SuTooggeq Aue eAeq qou saop exuogauuTW) •aoueznsuT azTnbaz saop eNuogauuTW geup sageDTpuT gozeasaz Aw 'zanaMog •aoueznsuT sa.Tnbaz A To eaze ozgaw zagpo ou gegp aw pawzo;uT seg 'dnzgsii ;jar //cell-10'4'4P s ,ATagegs •zw • squawaxTnbaz aoueznsuT zaquao a&essew alp uo paseq ST Pup 'TeoTdAq sT abenSueT aoueznsuT SuTooggeq agy • quauaiTnbaz aoueznsuT age oq SuTgoacgo owaw pagoegge agt papnTouT pup 'uoTgeoTTdde UP TTugns pTp Ate '2W ' E661 '6 uozew uO • TTounop o: uzngaz oq gsazaquT 3o uoTpeoTpuT quaTOT33nsuT peg 33egs 'TTeo auogdaTaq P uegp azow SuTgpawos zo uoTgeoTTdde UP gnotpTM • au pup NaaTO A TO agp tpoq Aq oq pa6zn SuTaq agTdsap 'uoTge3TTdde UP gTwgns 4ou pTp aH •aoueznsuT pazTnbaz agp uTeggo qou pTnoo aq Telp SuTAes 'Aaenzgaa uT pup Aaunuer uT am pauogdaTaq ATagegS •2W •SuTooggeq aoTpoezd oq zapzo uT 'E661 'L uozeW Aq asuaoTT e uTeggo oq pazTnbaz SPM aq gegp wTg SuTsTApe 'sooggey apTS PTTM sunt oqM 'ATagegS ueTzg •zW oq uoTgeDTTdde pue .zaggaT e quas NaaTO A TO agq 'E661 '6T Azenuer uO •SuoTSTAozd Mau eqq g4TM aoueTTdwoo oquT auoo oq (E66T 'L gDISW TTqun) sAep 06 uaAT6 azaM squawgsTTgegsa 6uT4STXa •SuTooggeq SuTwzo;zad aTdoad pup squaugsTTgegsa SuTooggeq SuTsuaoTT zo3 squawa1Tnbaz 3o SaTzas e papTAozd goTgM 'aATgoa33a aweoaq ZS£ 'oN aoueuTp2O ' E661 'L Azenuer uO :aN11O2t.)DVS aoueuTp2O asuaoTZ ooJgey :SU £661 '9T gDIIW :S,LFia Aauzoggv ATO 'AgaeN uazex :W0213 zogeagsTuTwpy ATO 'g3ezx sTuuaa :Oy W n a N V E O W S W ril . _ . ___. • The Council may wish to consider the insurance issue at the time it considers the application. ALTERNATIVES : 1 . Direct staff to prepare an ordinance repealing the insurance requirements in Sec. 6 . 52 . 2 . Direct staff to prepare an ordinance amendment to replace the insurance requirement with a bond requirement. 3 . Table for additional information. 4 . Take no action, which sustains the existing insurance requirements . RECOMMENDATION: Take no action. [16 MEMO] Attachment -------) -- ------ --------- CICC" , .D_ i — — n s• _ - - $ i • - - _ .C. - }-- 0 -\a--= -Ct- - - • t_ lb_& . _ to, ul.a_____D,s ___ , --- --t--(-) _3±-t-c-\.., ,,, , _- --ii ,_ _ , A, % . 1..,LA-Ato 741k-Lcs)-6,____. - 4-9 I! se, 10 % 6 • PLLAD. ' oma-- • k6. A--)------ -- .. --- - ..7)--- .... bi_ tho,k _ .._.. N-- \L- 0,._0,-Q saw 4 k? _ • _ _ : . t_____. \___ S),.. .:3 CK-t , (r) \ a) i 135 - -no LI . At ) r 011 1.1 iQ _ _____ D % - • _ I. I Ili 0 rt e_a fU A-Am .111 . ) V _ \ 0._C)._,Ci-- 9-__LL_L-0__-____I- 1 L-1-0-_- i . a - - , 2-ta_Acl-LP-a9,- 1-7) CONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Tahpah Park Concession Stand Improvement Project DATE: March 10, 1993 INTRODUCTION: Last year the City of Shakopee solicited bids for the Tahpah Park Concession Stand Improvement Project . All bids were subsequently rejected due to the unexpected high cost . The project plans and specifications have been redesigned in an attempt to reduce project costs . BACKGROUND: The Shakopee Jaycees have committed $60, 000 . 00 to the Tahpah Park Concession Stand Improvement Project . A reimbursement agreement with the Jaycees calls for annual payments from the Shakopee Jaycees in the amount of $10, 000 . 00 per year over the next three years with the remaining balance to be paid on or before June 1, 1997 . Funding for the project will initially be allocated from the park reserve fund. Initially, we expected the improvement project to cost approximately $60, 000 . 00 . The low bid submitted last fall was in the amount of $113 , 102 . 00 . In an attempt to bring the project into line with what has actually been allocated for the project, a redesign of the building plan and specifications has been undertaken. The project primarily consists of expanding the restrooms within the facility to accommodate larger groups and comply with ADA specifications . A small equipment storage room and a third covered wing is also being proposed for the project . While substantial modifications have been made to the design as compared to last years plan, we still expect that the bids may exceed the $60, 000 . 00 allocated funding amount . However, we believe that this project and the Shakopee swimming pool are the two top priority park improvement projects . Of all City parks, these two facilities receive the greatest use . If bids come in above the $60, 000 . 00 allocated amount, staff will be recommending that the park reserve fund be utilized to offset the cost overrun. In order to determine where we will actually come in in terms of project cost, it will be necessary for us to solicit bids for said project . It would therefore be appropriate at this time to authorize the appropriate City officials to solicit bids for the Tahpah Park Concession Stand Improvement Project . Following the bid submittal deadline, staff will be presenting the bid amounts to City Council for final approval . A status update of the park reserve fund will also be presented at that time . ALTERNATIVES : 1 . Authorize the appropriate City officials to solicit bids for the Tahpah Park Concession Stand Improvement Project . 2 . Do not solicit bids for the Tahpah Park Concession Stand Improvement Project . 3 . Table action pending further information from staff . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternatives #1 . ACTION REQUESTED: Move to authorize the appropriate City officials to solicit bids for the Tahpah Park Concession Stand Improvement Project . TAMI\ADMIN\TAHPAH93 BAS\tiv CONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator I FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director RE: Milwaukee Manor Subdivision DATE: March 10, 1993 INTRODUCTION: Mr. Leroy Menke has requested reimbursement for additional storm sewers related to the above referenced subdivision. BACKGROUND: On February 16, 1993, the City Council approved the final plat for the Milwaukee Manor Subdivision. To effectively develop this plat, it was required that a new storm sewer outlet be constructed for the City' s storm water retention pond in Eastview Addition to the new storm sewers in Dakota Street . This retention pond is located outside the boundaries of the Milwaukee Manor plat . Currently, the outlet from this pond in ineffective because the pipe is too large, which results in the detention pond not holding any water. There would be some benefits to the City to downsize this outlet pipe, making the pond function as originally designed. Secondly, the pond outlet currently does not discharge into any dedicated drainage easements . Staff has worked with the developers engineer in redesigning this outlet to correct the above two deficiencies . The developer, Mr. Leroy Menke is now requesting that the City reimburse for a portion of the storm sewer costs associated with his development that are solely for the benefit of the City detention pond or are for oversizing costs to handle the additional storm water volumes from the detention pond. The developer is requesting a reimbursement of $12, 000 . 00 for these costs . (See Attachment #1) Staff has reviewed the developers costs and also performed an independent calculation on the amount of storm sewer costs attributed to the City' s pond. Based on this analysis, staff recommends a total reimbursement of $8, 000 . 00 for these storm sewer costs . (See Attachment #2) The developer has agreed to this amount . Staff is requesting authorization to reimburse the developer $8, 000 . 00, to be paid from the Storm Drainage Utility Fund. ALTERNATIVES: 1 . Approve the request . 2 . Deny the request . 3 . Table the request for additional information or discussion. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1 . ACTION REQUESTED: Move to authorize reimbursement of up to $8, 000 . 00 to Mr. Leroy Menke for purposes of storm sewer oversizing associated with Milwaukee Manor subdivision, to be funded from the Storm Drainage Utility Fund, upon completion and approval of the work by the City Engineer. TAMI/MENKE.DH DH/tiv i-M9e#41- . /4- _5 -rdifft) Br oleo .f. f.0-01.-cd. /130 A70 ' D -r 1 I ( 1104 '/C T ° in, fq nr 04,e 1 y1 .10 + /Tr- 3J3 '10 , ezv /6/9C70. eS Aa . ob Zoo ' 44 .• N t-40.“ l 7d %�e,O, u e 0, 720/ •1 A'1.g1 .t 3yd. �,a �d iw.)a , D& /P4/0. qfl v/deil .s.req c rME ,©D a , .# �r D r494'. 01-4,1a / h/ 3 t3 l o . ‘i ° ♦1N e'tn-bc /9 ./04^e P,N. 7 Ta fil. M. / oo - I3344,.*.. -74-r-A4 / s/ 7a.o Ob r I 45 /6 l T i 'C' 20 fiol e 3 a ao. D.&•" .,e vi e>r r .06 , , r• 4' ,//VA c 11`' if1,2R ATTACHMENT #2 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS ESTIMATE FOR STORM SEWER OVERSIZING ASSOCIATED WITH MILWAUKEE MANOR ITEM UNIT COST TOTAL COST 1 . Pond Outlet Structure $ 900 . 00 $ 900 . 00 2 . 270 feet of 18" Pipe @ $ 20 . 00/LF $5, 400 . 00 3 . Catch Basin/Manhole $1, 000 . 00 $1, 000 . 00 Total $7, 300 . 00 Plus 10% Engineer (Design) 700 . 00 TOTAL COST ESTIMATE $8, 000 .00 TAMI/ATT#2 .DH CONSENT )10 , MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Directo<)16 SUBJECT: Stop Sign Request - 5th Avenue & Sommerville Street DATE: March 5, 1993 INTRODUCTION: Staff has received a citizen request for stop signs at the intersection of 5th Avenue and Sommerville Street. BACKGROUND: Attached is a letter from Ms. Mary Kaye Keohen of 718 Sommerville Street requesting stop signs at 5th Avenue and Sommerville Street. Ms. Keohen's letter is self explanatory regarding her reasons for requesting stop signs. On past stop sign requests, the City Council has been consistent in directing staff to perform a warrant study in conformance with the State Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (M.U.T.C.D. ) prior to acting on these requests and staff recommends continuing to follow that process. Once the warrant study is completed, staff will submit the results back to the City Council, along with a recommended action. ACTION REQUESTED: Direct staff to perform a warrant study to determine if additional traffic control devices are needed at the intersection of 5th Avenue and Sommerville Street. DEH/pmp STOP 918 Sommerville Street South Shakopee , MN 55379 445-7472 February 26 , 1993 Mr. Dave Hutton , City Engineer City of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee , MN 55379 Dear Mr . Hutton: The reason for this letter is to request a stop sign(s) at the intersection of 5th Avenue and Sommerville Street . With the school located on the corner and the church next to the school , I would think that there is enough traffic to warrant stop signs . I have lived in Shakopee for over two years, and not having any stop signs at that intersection has always bothered me. So when my husband said that there was an accident at that intersection earlier this week , I decided it was time to voice my opinion. Thanks for taking my request into consideration . Sincerely , :11A ail Kay Mary Kaye Keohen 0 0 kfl bLII ) 1 , MEMO TO: DENNIS KRAFT, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DAVE HUTTON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 11, SUBJECT: VEHICLE DIAGNOSTIC SCOPE Vi DATE: MARCH 4 , 1993 INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting authorization to purchase a new vehicle diagnostic scope for a total price of $18 , 007 . 00 BACKGROUND The Shop Division of the Public Works Department includes $20, 000 in the 1993 Capital Equipment Budget for the purchase of a new vehicle diagnostic scope. A diagnostic scope is essential for analyzing today' s engines and to provide proper vehicle maintenance on the over 50 vehicles from Public Works, Administration, Engineering, Building Inspection, Police and SPUC being maintained by the City Mechanic. The current diagnostic scope is a Marquette Analyzer which was purchased in 1980 for $7 , 000. This scope is outdated and cannot be used on many of newer vehicles. It also cannot perform all of the testing required to meet the new engine standards for emissions. Staff has obtained quotes from two vendors for a new scope. The quotes are summarized in Attachment No. 1. Both scopes were provided to the City Mechanic to use on a trial basis and both machines performed very well. The technology on today ' s scopes has substantially improved over the current scope and they can both perform the additional testing desired, such as compression tests, which are currently not possible. The Snap-on Tools scope has a few more desirable features and is slightly lower in cost than the Sun Electric Scope. The City Mechanic recommends purchasing the Snap-on Tools scope because of its size, versatility, overall cost and because it is very user friendly. ALTERNATIVES 1 . Authorize staff to purchase a diagnostic scope from Snap-on Tools Corporation for a total price of $18 , 007 . 00 . 2 . Authorize staff to purchase a diagnostic scope from Sun Electric Corporation for a total price of $18 , 292 . 99 3 . Direct staff to obtain additional quotes. 4 . Deny the request. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED Authorize the appropriate City officials to purchase a vehicle diagnostic scope from Snap-on Tools Corporation for a total cost of $18, 007 . 00, to be funded out of the Capital Equipment Budget. equip/scope ALTERNATIVE NO. 1 VEHICLE DIAGNOSTIC SCOPE Summary of Quotes Received Snap-on Tools Corp Sun Electric Corp Model : Counselor II MCS 4000 Base Price: $16, 262 . 00 $16, 547 . 99 Plus Computer Scanner 1, 745 . 00 1, 745 . 00 Total price: $18 , 007 . 00 $18 , 292 . 99 NOTE: Base price includes all taxes and trade-in on old scope. CONSEJT MEMO TO: DENNIS KRAFT, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DAVE HUTTON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ' ‘ SUBJECT: MAINTENANCE WORKER ' DATE: MARCH 10, 1993 INTRODUCTION Council authorization is needed to fill the new Maintenance Worker position for the Public Works Department. BACKGROUND The 1993 Public Works Department budget contains funds for the hiring of an additional Maintenance Worker. On December 15, 1992 the City Council authorized staff to advertise for this position utilizing the Scott County Personnel Office. The recruitment and screening process was completed by County Personnel Staff. Over 170 applications were received and, after prescreening, a total of 76 applications that met the minimum qualifications and received the top score were forwarded to City Staff. Upon review of those applications and subsequent interviews, staff has selected a candidate for this position. Six candidates were interviewed and a job offer has been made to the selected candidate. Staff is requesting City Council authorization to hire Mr. William Egan for Maintenance Worker in the Public Works Department, starting at Step 1 of the Union Pay Plan of $11. 58 per hour, contingent on the appropriate City of Shakopee pre-employment requirements. ALTERNATIVES 1. Hire Mr. Egan as recommended by the interview team. 2 . Do not fill the position. 3 . Direct staff to continue the interview process. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED Move to appoint William Egan to the position of Maintenance Worker at Step 1 of the Union Pay Plan of $11 . 58 per hour effective March 22 , 1993 . II $x MEMO TO: DENNIS KRAFT, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DAVE HUTTON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ALLEY GRADER .(; DATE: MARCH 11, 1993 INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting authorization to advertise for bids for a new alley grader. This item was tabled by the City Council on March 2 , 1993 for additional information. BACKGROUND On March 2 , 1993 staff requested City Council authorization to advertise for bids for a new alley grader. The Council tabled this request for additional information. The following items were asked to be investigated: • The need for this equipment based on its annual use. • Utilizing private contractors. • Utilizing shared equipment with other cities. • Purchasing a used alley grader. • Lease-to-own option. Staff would like to address each one of these issues separately. Need For This Equipment Due to the large number of gravel alleys in Shakopee, an alley grader is an essential piece of maintenance equipment for the Public Works Department. There are over 7 miles of gravel alleys in the City. The full size Caterpillar road grader used on the gravel streets is too large for the narrow gravel alleys. Typically, all gravel alleys are graded a minimum of twice per year and often up to 3 or 4 times per season to correct erosion problems after rainfalls . The alley grader is also an essential piece of equipment for leveling asphalt for street patching and is used for grading gravel shoulders on rural paved streets, grading all ballpark infields in the spring, grading the warning tracks periodically during the season and miscellaneous grading or landscaping. Attachment No. 1 is a listing of the annual usage for the existing alley grader. As indicated, it is currently being utilized approximately 105 days per year or about 40% of the available annual working days (260) . In 1989 the Public Works Department purchased a used 1978, Raygo alley grader for approximately $6000. Upon purchase, an additional 1. $4000 was spent to purchase parts to make this equipment operable. Since the initial purchase, the amount of maintenance required to keep this vehicle operational has far exceeded the normal anticipated maintenance costs. Because of these maintenance costs and the amount of down time associated with this equipment, staff requested and received permission to include a new alley grader in the 1993 Capital Equipment Budget. Staff feels that the need for this equipment was also justified in 1989 based on usage and the current request is for replacement of an existing grader, as opposed to adding a new grader to our fleet. Another factor to consider is the possible increase in usage due to the new grader having a cab and a heater, such as for assistance in snowplowing. The current Raygo does not have a heater making it unavailable for cold weather usage. Utilizing Private Contractors Staff has talked to suppliers, contractors, other units of government, etc. to try and find available contractors who a) have this equipment and b) would be available to do this work on a contract basis. It is quite apparent that there are very few contractors who have this type of equipment, with the exception of small asphalt driveway contractors and who would be available for the number of days needed to do the maintenance currently being done by the existing alley grader. There is a driveway contractor in Prior Lake who has a small grader that would be available for around $45 per hour, but due to their own business workloads, they would not be available for continuous contract work except for a few days early in the spring. Northwest Asphalt of Shakopee is a fairly good sized paving contractor who also has this type of equipment. They indicated that they could do this work for $60/hour (with operator) , but they need at least 2-3 days notice once the paving season starts. For the amount of use to fit our needs, (100 days per year) contracting this out would cost about $25-35, 000 per year assuming 4-6 hours of use per day. In 2 years, it would cost the City as much as purchasing a new one. In addition, the current level of service for responding to alley complaints would decrease due to the advance notice required by contractors. Sharing Equipment With Other Cities None of the surrounding adjacent communities currently have this type of equipment. The main reason for this is that most cities do not have the large number of miles of gravel alleys that the City of Shakopee has. The following is a summary of how the neighboring communities handle this issue: 2 . Chaska - utilizes a tractor with a drag, similar to what is used on infields at baseball diamonds, for their alleys. Savage - same as Chaska. Prior Lake - uses a contractor for the ball infields each spring. The City of Shakopee does belong to an organization called the Regional Mutual Aid Association. This organization provides lists of equipment from all participating communities making the equipment available for rent by other communities. The alley grader could be added to this list making it available to the above communities for rent, which would help recoup the costs of buying this equipment, although it is not possible to determine the amount of use by other communities and the subsequent amount of revenue this would generate on an annual basis. Scott County recently purchased a used alley grader from the City of Duluth for $25, 000 . They put in and got the bid on a 1976 Fiat Allis grader with a cab to replace their 1957 Allis Chambers grader with no cab. The County uses this grader for shouldering and blacktop patching. They grade the shoulders on the County Highways in the spring and fall as well as several times a year and after each rainfall . There are some County highways that require almost continued shoulder maintenance. The County has indicated that since they basically need the grader during the same times we do, it would not be available for the City of Shakopee ' s use very often. Purchase of a Used Alley Grader The City could expect to pay anywhere from $10, 000-20, 000 or more for a used alley grader depending on its age and hours used. Chances are that any organization selling a used grader would probably be selling an older model (+10 years) versus a newer model (2-5 years) . Since the current alley grader was purchased used (11 years old at the time of purchase) and it is quite clear that the City essentially purchased somebody else' s problems, which required substantial maintenance improvements to make it operational, staff does not see any benefit to purchasing another used grader. If this is the desire of Council, staff would propose to keep the current alley grader and continue to pour maintenance dollars into a piece of equipment that has exceeded its useful service life. 3 . Lease-To-Own Option Most suppliers will offer this as an option. The terms of the lease can vary from 1-5 years and typically the interest rate charged is 6-8%. At the end of the term the City has the option to purchase the equipment for a set price, usually a percentage of the purchase price. Again, these factors are set at the beginning of the lease term. They usually require a monthly payment, with the first and last months lease paid up front. The lease-to-own option is attractive to buyers that do not have enough capital to make an outright purchase, but due to the interest charged, the final cost of the equipment at the end of the lease is greater than an outright purchase. In addition, a leased purchase would come from the divisions operating budget rather than the Capital Equipment Budget. Based on the City' s Capital Equipment Fund, the Finance Director does not recommend utilizing the lease-purchase option. SUMMARY Based on the above research, staff feels that purchase of a new alley grader to replace the old alley grader is warranted solely by the use it receives, but also due to the lack of any real viable alternatives. Shakopee is unique from other cities in that we have a large amount of rural roads, gravel or paved with gravel shoulders, (26 square miles of land area) and also a large number of gravel alleys. The 1993 Public Works Capital Equipment Budget includes $60, 000 for the purchase of a new alley grader. The specifications for the alley grader have been completed and are attached for City Council approval . Staff is requesting authorization to advertise for bids for the new grader. The 1978 Raygo grader would be traded in as part of the new purchase. In regards to the specifications, it has been suggested that a cab is not necessary for this type of equipment. Because this equipment is used in early spring, late fall, after rainfalls, etc. , a cab is desirable to provide protection from the elements, heat for cold mornings, etc. With a cab and a heater, it could also be used in winter for snowplowing the alleys, which it currently cannot. The best time to grade is right after a rain or during light rains and therefore the operator should have protection from the rain, sun, etc. The work can often be quite dusty and therefore a cab would be important to keep the dust out. Because the doors must be kept shut a lot of the time for dust reasons, it gets extremely hot in the cab, hence the request for air conditioning. If the City Council wishes to delete the air 4 . conditioning, staff would not object, but staff does feel it is a relatively inexpensive item for the benefits received. The bid opening is scheduled for March 25, 1993 . ALTERNATIVES 1. Authorize staff to advertise for bids for an alley grader as outlined in the specifications. 2 . Authorize staff to advertise for bids for an alley grader, but revise or amend the specifications as directed by Council . 3 . Deny the request and direct staff to do one of the following: A. Continue using the existing alley grader. B. Look for a used alley grader. C. Bid out this work for contract service. 4 . Table the request. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED Move to authorize the advertisement for bids for an alley grader as outlined in the attached specifications. 5 . ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ALLEY GRADER Annual Usage Summary 1. Grading Gravel Alleys Spring - 20 days Fall - 20 days Misc (after rainfalls, washouts, etc. ) - 15 days 2 . Blacktopping - 10 days 3 . Infields/Ball Park Warning Tracks - 20 days 4 . Shouldering Rural Streets, Misc. Blading - 20 days TOTAL DAYS PER YEAR 105 DAYS CITY OF SHAKOPEE NOTICE OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR ONE (1) NEW MOTOR GRADER (ALLEY MAINTAINER) BIDS CLOSE APRIL 13 , 1993 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: The City of Shakopee will receive bids at the office of the City Clerk until 10: 00 a.m. , on APRIL 13 , 1993 , at which time they will be publicly opened in the council Chambers of the City Hall, 129 South Holmes, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 , by the City Clerk and Public Works Director or their designees and will then be tabulated and will be considered by the Council for: ONE (1) NEW MOTOR GRADER (ALLEY MAINTAINER) according to the specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk, 129 South Holmes, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 or the office of the Public Works, 500 Gorman Street. Each bid must be accompanied by cash, certified check, or bid and performance bond acceptable to the City in an amount equal to at least five (5%) percent of the total amount of the bid, payable without condition to the City of Shakopee. The security shall be subject to forfeiture in the event the equipment is not furnished by the date specified, if the bidder is designated by the City Council as the lowest responsible bidder and a purchase order is executed by the Public Works Director. The City of Shakopee reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any informalities or irregularities herein as they deem to be in the best interest of the City. By order of the City Council: JUDITH S . COX CITY CLERK INSTRUCTION TO BIDDERS 1. GENERAL A. INTENT OF CONTRACT It is the intent of these specification to describe a new Motor Grader as furnished. It is the intent of the City not to be restrictive to any one manufacturer, however, the unit desired must meet the enclosed standard and any unit furnished which does not comply with the specifications may be rejected and returned to the bidder. All units bid shall be current production model machines furnished as specified and ready to operate. All parts required for a complete unit and necessary for safe operation shall be furnished. It shall be equipped with the equipment and published literature for the unit. The complete unit as furnished shall meet all current federal highway safety standards and all current OSHA requirements. Catalog information showing the make, model and complete specifications of the unit the bidder proposes to furnish shall accompany the bid. If the bidder' s proposal is not in strict accordance with these specifications, the bidder must so indicate and describe any deviations in the proposal . Bidder shall supply the City with names and addresses of other cities or construction companies, preferably in the 7 county metro area, who have the type of machine that is being bid so the City can inspect a similar unit and possibly drive it before bid opening day. B. WARRANTY The successful bidder shall guarantee the unit and appurtenances for a period of at least (1) one year from the date of delivery. Any manufacturers warranties which exceed the 1 year period shall also apply. All warranties proposed by these specification and proposal shall apply where applicable. The supplier shall guarantee the machine against defective materials and/or workmanship. Any material found defective within the guarantee period shall be replaced at the manufacturer' s expense including labor. C. SERVICE The bidder shall state in the proposal the location of the nearest stock of repair parts or service shops which may be called if required. 1. D. DELIVERY The successful bidder shall deliver the complete unit ready for operation to the Public Works Dept. , 500 Gorman St. , Shakopee, Minnesota. Bidder shall state delivery date, or delivery under this contract must be made within ninety (90) days following contract award. E. PAYMENT Payment will be made within 30 days following the acceptance of the equipment received. The trade-in machine will be available at the time of delivery of the new machine, with 24 hours notice. F. NON-DISCRIMINATION The contractor shall be in compliance with all applicable federal and state statutes regarding non-discrimination and equal employment opportunity. Failure to comply with such statutes and/or affirmative action program may lead to the non-award of the contract or once a contract has been let, the cancellation of such contract. G. TAX EXEMPTION The City of Shakopee is subject to State sales tax only. H. IN SERVICE TRAINING A trained factory representative shall provide the City with training and instruction in the operation and maintenance of the unit at no cost to the City. I . MANUALS The successful bidder shall furnish the City with: 2 operator ' s manuals lubrication chart 2 parts manuals 2 complete service and repair manuals J. AWARDS Award of contract by the City of Shakopee will be based upon but not necessarily limited to the factors of (1) Price; (2) Parts and service; (3) Analysis and comparison of specifications details; (4) Delivery date; and (5) Past experience with similar or related equipment. It is the intent of the City of Shakopee to award the bid to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the specifications, provided that the bid has been submitted in accordance with the bid requirements. 2 . The City reserves the right to waive any informality or irregularity in any bid received; and to award the bid which is in the best interest of the City.The City Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Bids will be opened at 10: 00 a.m. on March 25, 1993 at which time they will be reviewed, tabulated, and then considered by the Council for award the following scheduled Council meeting date. K. TRADE-IN The City will trade-in one used Raygo Razor Motor Grader, Model Razor 350 , Serial #72B0170D equipped with front back fill blade and moldboard blade, which may be inspected at the Public Works Building at 500 Gorman Street, Shakopee, Minnesota, phone 612-445-2211. This unit is considered to be in good condition. L. BIDS Proposals or bids must be written and conform to the form hereto attached and directed to the City of Shakopee, Minnesota. All bids must be sealed and marked "BID ON MOTOR GRADER" and must be accompanied by a certified check, cash or bid and performance bond payable to the City of Shakopee, for not less than five (5%) percent of the total bid price. In case the successful bidder fails to furnish the equipment by the time frame desired by the City, the security (certified check, cash or bond) shall be forfeited to the City as liquidated damages. The bidder shall not stipulate in his proposal any conditions not contained in the contract conditions prescribed by the City. The City reserves the right to hold all bids for ninety (90) days. 3 . CITY OF SHAKOPEE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BID SPECIFICATION FOR ONE (1) NEW ARTICULATED MOTOR GRADER INTENT OF CONTRACT: Furnish and deliver to the City of Shakopee, Public Works Department one (1) new MOTOR GRADER (Alley Maintainer) meeting or exceeding the specifications in this proposal. Bid price to include the cost of the new machine LESS trade-in of one used unit. GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS : Units bid shall be currently advertised and produced models with all the latest changes and features offered as standard whether called for in these specifications or not, except where specifications call for a substitute feature or item in lieu of manufacturer' s standard. WEIGHT: The basic operating weight of each machine, without additional equipment, shall not be less than 9, 500 lbs. Specify weights of the following: Basic Machine Weight: Additional Equipment: Cab Weight: Front Mount-Back Fill Blade Weight: TOTAL WEIGHT OF MACHINE ENGINE: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Displacement: Not less than 144 C. I. D. Cylinders: Not less than 4 cylinders Cycles: Four (4) Horsepower: Not less than 55 H. P. Fuel : Capable of operating on #2 diesel fuel . Fuel tank capacity: 25 gallons minimum. Air cleaner: Safety element dry-type 2-stage, if possible, with service indicator. Muffler: Low noise type. Rain cap on exhaust stack if discharged vertically. Starting aids: Low temperature assistance such as glow plugs. Anti-freeze: To -40 degrees F. Block Heater: Frost plug type 110 volt TRANSMISSION: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Type: Hydrostatic drive, with one handle operating forward and reverse. Will except manual 4 speed selected transmission coupled to a velvet shuttle type power drive. 4 . REAR AXLE: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Shall have dual oscillating rear tandem drive axle. Shall oscillate lz' . Ground clearance to be a minimum of 8" . Differential type gearing shall match with type of transmission on the machine excepted. BRAKES : Shall have the following preferred specifications: Operating brakes shall have hydraulic disc type. PARKING BRAKE: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Shall have emergency disc type. STEERING: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Type: Articulated. Assistance: Indicator to show degree of articulation. Wheel Lean: 10 degrees left or right, hydraulically controlled. Articulation: 27' to 37' left to right and hydraulically controlled. Turning radius: Maximum 20 feet with steering and articulation. Steering Column: Adjustable with all controls at finger tips. Steering: Full power. HYDRAULICS : Shall have the following preferred specifications: Type: Constant response at all engine speeds. Minimum 10 gallon/minute pump. Filter: Full flow with magnet. Hydro tank shall be no less than 25 gallons capacity with magnet and screen. Temperature gauges numbers and low oil level indicator. Oil cooler mounted in front of radiator. Shall provide hydro blade float for front blade. MOLDBOARD: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Length: Minimum 8 ' - Maximum 10 ' Height: Minimum 12" - Maximum 16" Cutting edges: 5/8 thick with bolt pattern to match those of cutting edges that the city uses, punched holes in blade and moldboard. Blade lift: Above ground level minimum 10" . Blade cut below ground level (minimum 4") . Blade side shift minimum 30" . Blade shall have a forward pitch function hydraulic, if possible. Blade rotation left or right 45° . Blade shall have down pressure minimum 4500 lbs P. S. I . All blade functions should be hydraulically controlled except where noted above. FRONT MOUNTED BLADE: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Length: 7 feet minimum. 5 . PAINT: Manufactures ' s standard color yellow. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM: System: 12 volt. Alternator: 50 amps minimum. Battery: Heavy duty. Shock resistant. Lights: Two headlights - cab mounted. Front and rear turning signals with 4-way flashers, stop lights. Cab dome light. Instrument panel light. Blue strobe, top cab mounted, Warn-A-Lite type or equal . Back up alarm - electric. All electrical function shall turn off with key. MANUALS : Two operator' s manuals; two complete shop repair manuals of all components ; two parts books. All manuals to be delivered to the City before payment will be made. MANUFACTURER' S SPECIFICATION: A complete set of manufacturer' s specification and illustrated descriptions shall be furnished with the bid. GUARANTEED MAINTENANCE: The vendor contractor hereby agrees to furnish all parts and labor required to keep each unit in good operating condition for 1 years or 1, 000 hours, whichever comes first. In addition, the warranty repairs shall be handled as follows: There will be no charge for the first year repairs except for normal day-to-day consumed items (oil, filter, grease, etc. ) EXTENDED SERVICE PLAN: Shall give copy of specific' s of what is covered and how long, parts and labor. MAINTENANCE: The Shakopee Public Works Department agrees to provide such preventative maintenance and daily and monthly services as described by the manufacturer. SERVICE FACILITIES-DOWN TIME: The bidder will certify that he maintains an adequate stock of parts and employs qualified servicemen within the area available. TRAINING PERIOD: The successful bidder agrees to provide a training program for City employees, at time of delivery in sufficient scope to assure efficient and economical performance and maintenance of the equipment. The successful bidder shall perform the first scheduled maintenance checking over machine which will include the training program for the maintenance persons at the City maintenance Department. 7 . CITY OF SHAKOPEE BID PROPOSAL FORM 1. MAKE & MODEL OF EQUIPMENT BEING BID: COST $ 2 . LESS TRADE-IN TOTAL TRADE VALUE $ (-) 3 . PURCHASER PAYS ONLY THIS AMOUNT $ This total will determine the best total bid available to the City for a contract. 4 . OPTIONAL EXTENDED SERVICE PLAN $ DELIVERY DATE DAYS AFTER AWARD NOTE: Bidder must bid on all items and will be paid only Item #3 . Failure to bid on all items will disqualify bid. Respectfully submitted, Printed Name of Bidder: Signature of Bidder: Address of Bidder: Telephone Number: State whether bidder is: Individual : Firm: Partnership: By: Names of Partners: Titles: Address: Corporation: Telephone Number: State in which incorporated: Bid and performance security in the amount of 5% of the Base Bid accompanies this proposal , the same being subject to forfeiture in the event the equipment is not furnished by the date specified, if the undersigned is designated by the City Council as the lowest responsible bidder and a purchase order is executed by the Public Works Director. 8 . rONSE1\1T MEMO TO: DENNIS KRAFT, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DAVID HUTTON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: PIKE LAKE ROAD DATE: MARCH 11, 1993 INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting Council authorization to add Pike Lake Road to the Municipal State Aid System. BACKGROUND Attachment No. 1 is a summary of the State Aid System requirements . Please review that summary as background information for this item. Currently, the City of Shakopee has 1 . 65 miles of undesignated mileage that is eligible to be put on the system. This amount will continue to grow as Shakopee expands. Recently, the City sent in a request to add Spencer St . between 4th Ave . and 10th Ave . to the system and, if approved, would reduce our undesignated mileage to 1 . 12 miles . Based on last years allocation, the City receives about $26 , 000 per year per mile of State Aid Street . By not designating all the available mileage (20%) the City is not maximizing our annual allotment . The City of Prior Lake recently contacted staff regarding a request to add Pike Lake Road to their State Aid System. Since part of this road is located in Shakopee and part is in Prior Lake, they cannot add this road to their system unless Shakopee adds it to ours, since all State Aid routes must either connect up with another State Aid route (city or county) or a Trunk Highway. Pike Lake Road is located between McKenna Road (old CSAH 21) and County Road 18 and runs in the north-south direction between County Road 16 and County Road 42 . It is currently a gravel road. Approximately 0 . 50 miles of this road is located in Shakopee and about 1 . 0 miles is in Prior Lake . Prior Lake is now requesting that Shakopee add Pike Lake Road to our system, so that they can add it to theirs . The first step in the process is to send a preliminary request to MnDot and, if approved, a formal Resolution would eventually be needed. Cities have until March 31 of each year to submit the preliminary requests in to MnDot and have until May 1 to submit the formal resolutions . Pike Lake Road page 2 ALTERNATIVES 1 . Add Pike Lake Road to the State Aid System. 2 . Deny the request . RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 . Pike Lake Road is located on the correct spacing between C.R. 21 and C.R. 18 for a future City collector street . Since staff attempts to utilize the City collector streets on the State Aid System, this road appears to meet that criteria. Because the City has adequate mileage to add to our system and because the request will accomodate another governmental unit, staff recommends adding Pike Lake Road to the State Aid System. By adding this road to the system, the City does NOT have to upgrade the road at this time or any time in the near future. ACTION REQUESTED Move to direct staff to submit Pike Lake Road to MnDot for consideration on the City of Shakopee' s Municipal State Aid System. Dave\Pike ATTACHMENT NO. 1 SUMMARY OF THE MUNICIPAL STATE AID SYSTEM The City is allowed to designate 20% of its street mileage on the State Aid System. As the City continues to grow each year and expand its total street mileage due to construction of new subdivisions, additional State Aid mileage must be continually added to the system. A State Aid Route must connect up with another State Aid Route, either City or County, or a Trunk Highway. It is assumed that streets on the State Aid System will need to be upgraded every 25 years . The City determines exactly when any State Aid Street needs improvements . Just because a street is on the system does not mean it needs immediate upgrading. The City receives an annual allotment of funds to be used for State Aid System improvements. The allotment is distributed amongst all eligible cities (over 5000 population) based on a formula of 50% population and 50% needs . Needs are defined as the estimated costs it would take for the City to completely upgrade all State Aid Streets over the 25 year period. Based on that formula the City of Shakopee is receiving approximately $400 , 000 per year to upgrade our system, although the exact amount varies each year. This amount accumulates if not spent each year, but the maximum allowed to accumulate is 3 times our annual allotment . There are 2 important facts to keep in mind regarding the State Aid System: 1 . If the City fails to add new streets to the system, the amount of "undesignated mileage" continues to grow. The more undesignated mileage a City has the less "needs" it has and the amount of annual allocation is not maximized. 2 . If a City does not spend down its balance fast enough, it will grow to exceed the maximum allowed (3 times the annual allotment) and the State may elect to penalize that City by taking some of its balance . . •th Vesterironspor OM w r❑ _Creek I Rice' akr MUNICIPALITY OF '-''r S H A < E I- PREPARED BY THE CHANHASSEN CARVE. ° Cd' \A JESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATON �' '`- - 41" Co.— 'Inn( ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION � ..i IN COOPERATION WITH ,.'�.. Tr•°""U,S, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION �4 ii"/1, 10 . FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ()NIL ^ ,y�,) .:141,11 • ==.- .i i C s 1600' — o SCALE uoo' 3200' �r $ ,:'� cp. `,..•0011 wig* r- 1992 )00 4111". JIM'. " . ' • la' . cE %oa r. .. : 4% 4-stikoP• .,,�,�. 's,nRE�IHL A w,ma,.A....II[1. •-� + 4. . - : - . -ri ,�•. -,i` 1E-10kIITI1H -..-. f IrM . ' :.killp 3 igutfi ,.,. 77'J r:: •:i •111114 ""I �. •• • . �. LEGEND _ .. � _ INTERSTATE TRUNK HIGHWAY_— is • i A> US.TRL K HIGHWAY—. C3 --- -40%rig ..� I t STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY..... OO .••'' � •' 1 www COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY_. t • seo� n q4 i . G. m a MINTY ROAD +. KM CI. CORPORATE LD "'-•' + •i' PUBLIC ROAD 0 I. PRIVATE ROAD �a • �� ._ + + g t ofikapS a -.0 + + i ,s„v„ 0� �/ Lake 41 11 4 ✓ i/r----,J 3 ;IPAL STATE AIDhLla . __� BEET SYSTEM r///_ LEGEND \{ �u �' STATE AD STREET-Oa + 0 OO Ti HOO .. _.. Schne,% r - La ll 'di ® gyp, /� Ww a r . ».+�... U.S.CENSUS-PM11.739I „`- T ® 1990$HW�EE M. S A S MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator / til FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE : Downtown Alley' s - Underground Utilities DATE: March 8, 1993 INTRODUCTION: Council has directed staff to place on the City Council agenda the discussion of the downtown underground utility issue and pending alley improvements . If the downtown alley' s are to be reconstructed in 1993 , resolution of the downtown utility line issue must be resolved as soon as possible. BACKGROUND: Last year the downtown alley' s were scheduled for reconstruction. However, the project was delayed pending the results of the SPUC underground study. The underground feasibility study has been completed and cost estimates have been developed for the project . Shown in Attachment #1 is a correspondence from Mr. Lou Van Hout, Utility Manager, summarizing the cost estimates for undergrounding the overhead utility lines . Note that Mr. Van Hout' s correspondence attempts to group the various line items by the respective party responsible for funding. Mr. Van Hout has indicated that the first four line items represent the customer owned equipment which is usually covered by the customer (Average cost is $8, 000 . 00 per block) . In addition to the first four line items represented in the feasibility analysis, it should be pointed out that the customers would also be responsible for the cost of undergrounding their service line and connection costs . These costs are not included in the total cost estimate and could vary substantially from property to property. The customer owned equipment cost (first four line items) could be assessed to the property owners in each block. Other financing options for the customer owned equipment include tax increment funds or the capital improvement fund. Funding the City' s portion (main underground conduit and alley street lighting) could either be partially assessed or picked up using the proceeds from the tax increment fund balance or capital improvement fund. (Average cost - $17, 250 . 00 per block) Mr. Van Hout' s correspondence also indicated the costs the Utility Commission would normally cover. (Average cost - $14, 875 . 00 per block) The underground feasibility study looked at the possibility of undergrounding ten blocks in the downtown area. On March 8 , 1993 the Public Works Director and I traveled each of the blocks to determine if they were indeed suitable for undergrounding and alley resurfacing. Shown in Attachment #2 is a map indicating the alleys that we are recommending for reconstruction and also those alleys where undergrounding is being recommended. Attachment #2 also indicates existing overhead lines and underground conduit . Based upon our survey of the area, we have put together a new cost summary utilizing the figures represented in the feasibility study report . (See Attachment #3) Using the assumptions developed by Mr. Van Hout in his correspondence we have also broken down the cost by group consistent with Mr. Van Hout' s grouping. Note that our analysis also includes $8, 000 . 00 per block to reconstruct the targeted downtown alleys . Staff is proposing a zonal assessment approach to cover the cost of resurfacing the alleys . City Council should discuss at a later date whether or not the alley should be assessed at a reconstruction rate, new construction rate or something in between. Staff is recommending that an informational meeting be set for Tuesday, April 6, 1993 to discuss with the alley improvements and undergrounding utilities . If public sentiment favors undergrounding we would then proceed with the MN Statutes Chapter 429 improvement process to complete the process . ALTERNATIVES : 1 . Authorize the appropriate City officials to set an informational meeting for Tuesday, April 6, 1993 to solicit comments on the downtown alley and overhead utility line improvement project . 2 . Authorize the appropriate City officials to set an informational meeting at a Committee of the Whole session on Tuesday, April 13 , 1993 . 3 . Forego the informational meeting and direct staff to initiate the 429 improvement process for the downtown alley and underground utility project . 4 . Terminate discussion on the underground utility issue and direct staff to initiate the 429 improvement process for the downtown alley improvement project . 5 . Table action pending further information from staff . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1 . ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the appropriate City officials to set an informational meeting for Tuesday, April 6 , 1993 to solicit comments on the downtown alley and overhead utility line improvement project . TAMI\ADMIN\UNDERGR BAS/tiv -441 ( TO: Barry Stock , Asst . City Admin . FROM: Lou Van Hout , Util . Mgr. RE: Downtown Alleys, U.G. Electric DATE: 1 /27/93 Enclosed are two revised spreadsheets from our consultant which shows the concepts we discussed on 10/1/92 . Page 1 shows ten blocks in the project , Page la shows eight blocks . Please note that there are two sets of totals and subtotals on each spreadsheet . For page 1 the top half is for blocks 21-25 , and the lower half is for blocks 28-32 . Top and bottom figures must be added together to get the costs for that nage . • Explanation of Subtotals : Each line-item on the spreadsheet represents a single type of component in the overall project . The line-item costs are subtotaled in the right hand column on the spreadsheet to aid in discussing a sensible way to allocate the project costs . The grouping of the line-item costs was based on an assumption of the benefit received. Using the figures on page 1 as reference, the assumptions used to develop the grouping for the subtotals , and the associated cost allocations are : - The first 4 line-items represent : - Those items which would normally be customer owned equipment . $54 , 270 plus $26 , 730 = =8 _:000 - The next 2 line-items represent : - The main underground conduit which produces the major aesthetic benefit to the area by providing for the wiring to be put underground. - New streetlights (actually alley lights ) which would normally be a City , or an__ assessed cost . $93 , 000 plus $79 , 500 = 117? 50.0 - The next 11 line-items represent : - Hich and low voltage cables , transformers , connection boxes , and misc . eauipment , which are assumed to provide a betterment to the electric utility System. This was assumed a SPDC cost . $85 . 535 plus 563 , 250 = $14$1.785 In C o g 0 0 N .1 0. 0 M 0 4.. V1 CO CO iN in NN 0 n CO O Ps p .t N N M N N in NJ V NI 01 C0 M N `M O N M 3 -'0000 00 000100000000 -.0000 00 00000000000 C NOO 00 O.ONVA000000M 014,1(-.O 00 O.t.-0MOO44000 ✓0' -NO 00 0PCON-001000 o 0.01-1(110 N0 •O IA 00 NON 0 0 o� I-•N IA J N o3, In M M� CO N NP V1 ✓ 1--0..44N. •t V> IA N.t °p VA PIAN ✓ uN NMMM 6764 MMMN�MMMMM I-0- M44 MM M AN NN MMM 0 se V . 0000 00 00000000000 0 0000 00 00000000000 0 m 0.--NAO 00 O449JIA440044MON /- OPNO 00 OMM11100000044 P .-.n V1.t 00 M ON OVA O tP- N O•M- 00 M •O tN JO O M a ''\'''''s\--, +MN MM M MN AN M �t YM NM 4444 M N M M �t p l m M m M C 47 00 0 04- 000M04-4-004-0 000/4 O.,- 0004-0.-0004-0 ✓ NO.. 0 J 3 .N 0 J 3 0 344 3 J N 34- . 3 3 P•• 12 C CC L o 0000 00 00000000000 O 000 00 00000000000 0 / MMOO 00 0.tMO44NN0MMM N.- 300 OCO440 00 O44CSO44M4444NON IA Y/j rt•00 00 03 1(1 0 P 010 N 00 0 SVA 0 p dp Y MMM 4-44 MM N M �t l Y44N N 6464 N MM N. M M �, M \ m 0000 0.- 000440004-000 OOON 0..- 000N000004-0 O\ 1,..0.- N 03 k Ory N 0 0 L \ 1 1-▪ \ N.0 M 3NM.-' M .t N �� _ .. V 1 04 0000 00 0 D00000000 N �C000 00 00000000000 O ✓ 4400'0 00 ONI004444MONN M NIN0 00 OMNNMMOONNo v1 ✓ MP\ 00 04411044 in 0 M M 010 0 VA VA .- a N BONN .O.- M MMN P m I M 44 N.- M N N M N E Y MMM MM 44 MM N �t I. Y ON 44 M M M V LI L--. NL m C • y7 m 0 O y ..,...74p0, O.- 000-t.-000.-oo O O.- 04- 000000.-000 N 0 44 6 244 . �� Z 4 V 22 a U 8 ••••C N O ✓ 0 C✓ O m 0 W 0000 00 00000000000 0 0 00 00 00000000000 O U ✓ MCp.t0 00 OOOOMNM64o44M N N o 00 OJMVIMMONOMN CO `.-� • f-NO 00 ppm° V1 N / pp.. '0P 00 001 h VA IA 02 U N MPM b4- M M P 11( N ••O•- M'44 64 N P CO X•- ANN M N NN N IA M 44 64 M M M c•.•-• •C1 I 44 44 44 44 0406/06) V>•-CO Y m \ 0 <Vi O L 4. 0 LV- O 0000 0.- 000300004-00 `0 OM 0.- 0004,-004-04-00 >4.4044- 0 2 N ONO OO J N OP 3,4<m> 4, ✓ .t C0 M 3.-3 N M .t 111 4-C 0! 4,4, LInU3O >• C O•-✓M to ✓ 04,U V 0 L • J Of- 030 ✓0 d1(✓Uw.t 0 < U O L 6! C O! 0000 00 00000000000 0 0000 00 00000000000 0 704.44-.4-. 0W-4 ✓ IAM 0 00 O •00004/OMAN IAN IAO 00 044--0440444444044 .- L • InY L0 P 00 M 6401440 O m C0 1!'10 00 M IA 0 0 0 4-•CD>• .-L ON L K. IV� N 0' 1 44 •N.t �p M NIA N MI 0•. M 3 IA in [pC 44 4,E200 ✓ p0� co Y 44 6444 M 446444 M .T YM M NM 44 44 44 M M 0U •C I L U EN.- E L M YO w7... Ip N m CO 01--•04, '000 4,0 000M 0.- 00044.---O--000 0000 0.- 000440.-000'-0 C .1-.C C 01 0 N- •0 O .t.t CO 04 V1.- 0 J CO L 0 -. 0 C to N .- N .t .t'- .t .t •- -✓•-✓ .- '00✓01>X L-J L 4-q 40 L•V••-V O TALC 2104- 00 0 •! L✓✓_ 61 L to 6!CO 013 3•- aa V C V) 61.t ✓✓✓ • ✓ • ✓✓✓ • • • • • • • • ✓✓✓ • ✓ • ✓✓✓ • • • • • • • • -01-0 OL O L w4-4 4-43 v-w4- 4JC0O6C000 w•► O 4-C wwv- 496WEm478)4 •- M ✓0C \\\V \V \\\VVVVVVVV \\\V \V \\\VVVVVVVV 0✓ ✓CC3.-- 0000 •- 000000 00000000000 0000 0000000000000 C �-V I- 1 N in 01 0 111 01 A N1 6!• 4 .30 0) •M •O • 0 IA 0 A 0 V •M •0 • • • 440 V01A O IA • ✓Y✓ 0-,N > 4464_44 6444444• V 444 . N44O � [ . V .- 6444 (' PAN M4 - A." M44N (' OPAN UVOCLC M MM MNMNN44 M MM MMMMN44 0 2004- EU LN U30 CZ 0 _ « _ « •-4 In 0) O -8 C/1 m 0• •Y Y m ......0' 4)L 4)C 1 VI I- 0 0 > UV V .000 0 > V U V ZOO ✓✓ 00 " � U` •0 8.--.U.- 0 0 OA '-1( •• LL•-0/-•C- CV ✓0 04 O •- c. a - U appmrCL<Wn U X N -gL aLLa • V `✓aEa NO -g 1' at. V e.-,.:LaLt O \« � 01 ,..,,,,-0 .v ...,,,,,,,- \« U m MM 0VUMMN' ..- 0000 - C.- 0 • • 0000L 0 • • O� \EE0. -UI • 11 0� \EE0. '-V) • . . ti.t, 4 0Ve4) €LLLL -E-& V: 0, UU€CCCCC ."M= .f1(l MVIKIMVIIMM-HI-4 .'-M= •IC/ MIAMUNMM,..1- < ✓ P 0 M 0 ✓ N 0 0 N O N 0 N 0 0 0 0 N N ✓ ✓ J in M in .0 .0 .- 1- CO N N 44 M N N N N M 4- 44 M -0000 00 0015100000000 -.0000 00 000100000000 CinN00 00 OdNin00000044 CA..-O 00 ON000OMOOMM _ C LO...-NO 00 d0•CO N.50in000 ✓ 151 CO t- 00 0.-Min NO 00 O .O co0 C . . . •. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-Nin.N 151 151MM- NNPin ✓ r N CO CO OJM PM Nt-NCO •O P C) M.--N, M MH.- M.-rM 0 .-• V1 '41.4 N O C 444444N M MM `- MM M M )-- a 0000 00 00000000000 0 0.-M1O 00 OMC0151M004,4414044 N •-•0111.5 00 M ON 0 in 0 !- N N N N N N 0.... M 'NN In CO Y 40/414,4464 N M N M M M M N .t C N 0000 0.-- OOOM0.--.--00. 0 NPM O J J JNN J J N .... O O ........... O .... O O ........... O 444100 OO OJMOMMHOMHM C- NMOO OO OJMOMOMOMMM I� Jd0 00 OJ in O P Jd0 00 OJ In 0 O P J _ _ _ J _ ...QQ. . . . . . . ..pp. . ..p. . . . . . . . .p. NHM MM MN N N .0,t mi NAM «M MN M 44 M .Jt m N m N 0000 0.- 000 N000.-000 0000 0.- 000 N0.-0.-000 O C�0.- N 0J NO.-• N 0J L c..1•0 M ..7,-. N d M J N co L V 2 m C) 0000 00 0015100000000 In 0000 00 0015100000000 in ✓ MOI-0 00 OCOCOOOMMMOMM M MONO 00 OCOCOOOMNMOMM M C) MPN 00 ON-in ON 41 0 NI0•t- 00 O/-in ON V1 0 CO 0 E Y MMM NN 44 MM M .fit MMM IN .ONN.15 MM M MM MN N .t V U L.... N L- M I- CD C i 0000. 0- 000,-000.-00 0000' 0.- 000.5.-000'00 O V 777 ON- N OMM 77 ON- N OMM ✓ C)z INN M J.. X PN M J•-•- U ✓q 7 6 EU Y LL U U ✓ 0 V O M0 CG 0 W 0000 0 0 00000000000 0 0000 O O 00000000000 0 UT ✓ 44 0.5 0 00 0000401401#6401014, N 4/40.).40 0 0 0000440444404444 N w✓ • ✓ I-NO 00 00.00 V1 N NNO 00 00'00 0 151 N 02 U N MPM _d.- M M P .- N MO•N d.- M `mi v P V1 X•^ MMM M N MM M In MMN M 44 MM M N N 04, •CC) i Y 44 44 Y M 44 NOWOM 0 ,-.-00 Y CL m 0 <0 0 L ✓ CJ Lr. O 0000 0.- 000.40000.-00 0000 O.- 000-4O.-00.-00 >✓ C)•^ 0 2 N N OVIO N N 01510 in 54<0> 4)4) J00 M .5.--.5 .5 0 M ..1••-•5 C_>,i�.-02.= O ✓ L V U 3 0 ✓ O+O-•U CM 04. . . 04.020 4,04)134,04-.50 < UO.CV C V 0000 00 00000000000 0 7O4141✓ C0- L . M. CM0MNM � q 0> E.-L N O ^ 00' 00 MinNO 0N - . N O. M «NJ M VU 0 C N 4, E 3 O O -V M NM 4,1 U -CV C✓E�C . M .. _ N L .. ....m.., moo CmCVO 000N0. COO . 0. 000 ^\C -CO0 1.- .0 0 .?JC LOE-LCCN - 00✓O»KL-L 4-C471.-V..-410 CALCI 2"0.4- OC L✓✓= V L N ✓ C VCU).1C)J•^ 4,414, w w C •.C 414141 w w co C7 C)C7 m CJ C7 C) w w w • v✓- 0 v✓-V-•4-0 m C3 CO W CC Cfl C) ST L 0 rC V O o ",.........4) \W \\\CWWWWWWW \\\W .....0 S. V V V V V V V V U0 -'V✓U C C V V 0000 O O 00000000000 .0.0.0.0 O O 00000000000 C E C T- m V \L 0000 00 InOln 0000000 0000 00 In0N151 0000000 V^ . • L C 0 •M •O N.N 0 in 0 in 0 in •M •0 •N-C.)0 in 0 in 0151 • 4,-1/4, O-tV > - in 1510•.-N 0 • N- 0.144 - - - - 0.4--M 0 • IN.�ppM •• - . V V. - L 111-11(0 U C MM.- in.-- MMM N N..0p PinN NA.- In. «...«.4' N N..pp O.151N U V O C L0 C� O M OM M 0 M M M M M M MN M O N M H M N 0 3 0 0 -^E U 1-0 U 30 0 0 0 C7 =CC C CO,1 S « = << q0131- TS N 0 » 0 >> C Q CO CO • . ..1,-.Y CC • • •-11-IC VLV L CA I- 0 0 >> U U V .000 0 > U U V .000 L•-- V ✓ V •Li< ✓O ✓ •V Vi V UV-O <✓✓0 41 •00 VUCO.in "LC-°C 0 V Lt L tt L 8 CNF-OC<WO U x N . . . -gL •aaa •.g✓ a Qa N . C as V g✓-K-Kts O S..« U Of P'SM' V V UMM N- \<<U C CF ,p.„-.. . .„,„ 000in 0_, �UEE�EEj a. -- ny`yy - 0000 iO.J \E E6C a•-tn{• Ct - •JEa ."NN L 151 �QQ C C C 4 ANN` 1!1 L U= i0 C qC C t0 t L (7 (J L L L t • L L C a✓ i ✓ QD In u aS L L L L a a✓ ✓ QO In CI C) a n L L L L to �.-mx ..to NIinh in CA MM r-4-44 �.-M= JN NIin MN Vi MM I-)--f-4- < [44,1 -'''. ....'". " ) 4 ' A OOD .. = .. i l )1E \ it FULLER 1----' . ik , vv\V g .=-.1----- -..,-.7. ;-:"- \\ E - -!_ ! . ' ' T" .T.f._---- HOLMES ...____ = 6;41 ' 1 IliliE - Nab —....... ; t , ' Im.iii . % 1 -- Di !!1, LEwi S mII *4. . i xN j, ) A . ) 1 i 1 vAN � ii / SOS ME?VVI;.LE • / . : O.. / NI : � i /V.1 /; - N SFE• CER - O I 111(7.17 ,.. FILLMORE rj r b 0 SCOTT Axy x O MI L] 0 te.,=X a r �' 1 cn ! m col ei 0 ATWOOD 1I I— • - o S,.r S.L 5 5 r, ►. o * * * U 1 u, m a, 01m MM M MWM, W11J _ r_ . r— i r. . r_ r_ i r_ r_ . ._ r_ . , , _ . r_ 1 11 . r� o AWN' Waren 'Ili 1 E S IIIK� = HOLM w 00019004M000004 AiNION„ 41, iii. •-•••••• 1WWWW^114000001W I.IM, ' LEWIS _ o UWirdieseamodmes. & k& . WAVAVAIO "V : E�III •., •Hi•••••. 444 \\. \ r,Ili t% ••� rr ••�orww•�� 'i•' _col d .•••. SOMMERVIttE ' "" "' • "- _ �•�" �' cn o, O1 �\\\�: �\� wi,f� J • P''• b'7 yy SPENCER / r ' ~ ~ b 0 0 W -0 0) I M p b b b L - LsT. FILLMORE U - o n o tzib Z3 o m -a co co h `b N co h N N 1-•c Attachment #3 Proposed Downtown Alley and Underground Work Cost Breakdown Undergrounding Costs - Blocks 22 , 23 , 24 , 25, 29, 30, 31 1. Customer Costs - First Four Line Items - $60,280 2 . City Costs - Next Two Line Items - $109,500 3 . SPDC Costs - Remaining Eleven Items - $102,295 Alley Surfacing Costs - 21, 22 , 23, 24, 25 $8, 000 per block Total Cost - $40, 000 Assessed Portion - To be determined. , ci 4W, #3 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O J O O O O OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F"ain O co O O O 0 49 CO U) 69 0 0 69 69 0 69 p r CO to Cr O O 0 O N 0 to o n F o N N N N O M N R N U) CO E9 E9 69 69 N 69 49 (9 69 (9 69 E9 a69 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 II 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) 0 U) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J i- U ui 0) r o 0 o r� m R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < 49 69 0 to 0 69 49 N to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F. Z Q (� V9 069 69 0 N N 0 U) 0 U) 0 U) 0 d 69 43 49 (9 FA 69 M 69 ~ `VO N 0) M CO 0 r 0 O 0 M O r r O O r O Z C N N K V N Q 0 0 1- L L L L L L L L L L O Z 0 • V ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ci: ll ll N Li N IL IL It N (0 c0 CO CO (O tO CO 2 W w W W W W W W W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (CC R 0000 00 00000000000 0 0000 00 00000000000 0 V ¢ r0i 0 0 0 0 o v to 0 69 69 69 0 o» 49 690 ¢ o m 0 0 0 0 n o uoi o tqi 0 v (� 0 0 0 o v_ o rn • p n o n o 0 o r to o n U N (D M O co O O U O Cl U) 69 69 69 - fA69 69 d9 69 69 69 69 N N 69 69 69 VT 69 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II 1 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o IIII 2 •,:t. O O O O O O U) O U) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J W M O 0 0 0 0 0 U) O t0 o O O O O O O O J I- V tri of r o 0 o n m c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q F- tri of r o 0 o n co v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0. < Z �v69 49 v9 0 0 69 69 69 n 0 0 on 0 u°i 0 °n I- 0 -Z U- �' v9 41 49 0 69 69 E9 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I' • a Q f9 N V N (D 0) U) N • a N N CM fA 69 69 fA fR E9 O II'�' �1 f9 49 f9 (9 69 E9 f9 F9 M W CO ^V O O O 0 0 r 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) 0 .- 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 • F- N- 0 r N 0 O F 0 CM N 0 CO Z N (0 CO V N Z M M C N Q O U 0 UF- L L LL L L L L L L F- L L L L L L L L L L Z LL lL lL Cu IL N IL IL IL eCC (C A ro (U6 as (UO A Z LL U Cr (VO (LLL IJ lL (UC 66 (U6 9 R e0 (�0 r^ 0 W W W WW W W W W W = W W W W W W W W W W Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o o O O O O O o 0 o O o O 0 0 J 0 0 O O 0 0 O o O O O O O O O O o 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O O o O O O O 0 F- O O O O O O O O U) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l� F" o O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O k. H O H9 O h 0 0 0 0 W CO 0 0 69 f9 69 0 69 E9 FQ.. O N wi M N M 69 ton O O N N M 69 N (O 69 N 69 N M O) 1� 0 0 O N. U) O N U) O ,/..). U � » co F9 • U i9 69 i9 69 69 69 M 49 69 e1 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ii p o o 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to ii N 0 0 0 0 0 0 (n o n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o J W o 0 0 0 0 0 U) O to o 0 0 O O O O o O F- U tri 0 r o 0 o t� (0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < F- tri 0) r o 0 o N- (D V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o < Z CEJ to F» of co) o f9 vi e9 n N o (0n o voi o v0i �' Z V i9 COoLO o 69 69 e9 n N o tn, o (0n o ton F' Ud O 69 u9 N R N 0) U) N d N 69 N 19 v9 69 69 0) 69 CM F- CO r1 N 63 N f9 f9 F9 49 F9 CO^V ^ Y0on0 Nr 0MM6- ro00r00 - 000r � r 0000000 - 000 - CC Q N Cl K r r Q r V O 0 0 I i t• C L L L L L L L L L L _- _ L L L L L L L L L L W Z it LL LL (0 LL (°0 Ll. LL LL (UO (UO (VO N N cUCCC Z IL It. Cr: (('-(5) LL (UO ll. li lL (°0 9 (°6 t°0 N (UO 6 N C W W W W W W W W W W W W WWWWUJUJWW T W OO 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 o O O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 O o O O O O O o o O O o O O O 0 O 0 O O O . 00 . 0 . 00 . . . O O O O oO O O O O O O O O O O O O O C Q Q (n t CO R ca 0 O O O O O O to 69 69 69 O 69 69 N Q U 49 o C O O O O C 69 o fA 69O Nf O 69 69 co '1 1 F pU h N O O O (O O 0) 00 O � N to N 0 p p co D 0) 6 1- f4O O o uO U) 6 " Ito o to LO 4 W co:: � � v 9 v � tqN 9 69 63 o o O o O o O o o O o o O O o O O II Q O O O o O o O O O O O O o O O O O II W N o 0 0 0 0 0 to o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W N-14 0 0 0 0 o o to o to o to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • F- to o r 0 O O h O V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < F- U) o r o O O t` U) C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < Z U f9 N N M 69 O K! fA N (� N O U) O U) O In ~ Z V N N 69 M 69 0 N N N t- N 0 U) 0 U) 0 U) 0 E 16 N N N C N (D 0 U) N O • d N U9 69 N N 69 fA (9 69 O 1 V3 69 69 FA 49 6H f9 f9 ry� �f F- 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 '7 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 F' 0 0 0 M r 000 0 0 - 0 00 ,- 0 - 0 0 Z R O r M C 6-V ' Z r N M V O 0 I- _c L L L L L L L L Sc F- L L L Sc L Sc Sc L L Sc O0 UCVUCOVN 0 ° N NUO3 Z it It IL (O IL (O It IL It 0 (O AS (C CO CO CO Z CL IL IL L R) ILL L6 66 e0 03 CO O W W WWWWLUWWW 0 W W W W W W W W W W C7 (7 Q Q 7 co 0 ci ci Y Y a F- F- o U U se se 00 1- 0 U (� (� o U U U v ^ to • > > r t m et ro gi •2 Qo c la r .0a m m W0 a s n ° U L r L L W o ° '- M M a °a U L L L L Q C p c a M co a . ca. ca. ca. a N- ¢ ¢ 0 c a a a a a 0 0 0 $ U g, o E E .) g w `) M M N oo 0 0 U o U E m .CI M M N N N In r U U d LL (� to y to y N N (n J r E E a C C C Z r r .: ° J r p o 0 c.) ci L t ro co° co A a s La to La o °m ° a a m A m CL s CO co0. O M M M F ~ F F M �7 M to M C. M M F- F- 1- F- CONSENT / -2.. 0L, MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Adminiptpator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Extinguishing An Easement i Weinandt Acres 1st DATE: March 11, 1993 INTRODUCTION: Mr. Harry Weinandt, developer of Weinandt Acres 1st and 2nd, has requested the release of a temporary easement in Weinandt Acres 1st Addition. BACKGROUND: Mr. Weinandt subdivided his property in two phases, Weinandt Acres 1st and Weinandt Acres 2nd. In the event that the 2nd phase was never recorded, the Planning Commission and City Council required a 60 foot roadway easement when the 1st phase was platted to insure access from Marcia Lane to Marschall Road. The second phase, Weinandt Acres 2nd, has been platted and the roadway from the 1st Addition to Marschall Road has been dedicated. Since the original temporary roadway easement no longer serves a purpose, and it crosses three lots in the 2nd addition making them undesirable lots, it is appropriate to release the roadway easement. The Planning Department has reviewed the location of the temporary easement and has approved its release. Upon approval of the release by City Council, the City Attorney will prepare the quit claim deed releasing the temporary easement for execution by city officials. ALTERNATIVES: 1] Release temporary easement 2] Do not release temporary easement RECOMMENDED ACTION: Offer Resolution No. 3763 , A Resolution Authorizing Delivery Of A Deed To Extinguish An Easement In Weinandt Acres First Addition, and move its adoption. RESOLUTION NO. 3763 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DELIVERY OF A DEED TO EXTINGUISH AN EASEMENT IN WEINANDT ACRES FIRST ADDITION WHEREAS, under date of September 10, 1980, an easement was executed by Harris Weinandt and wife Lillian Weinandt running in favor of the City of Shakopee for the purpose of providing a 60 foot roadway easement, among other things, from Marcia Lane to Marschall Road across Outlot A, Weinandt Acres First Addition, Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota, and said easement was filed for record in the Office of Register of Deeds of Scott County, Minnesota on September 16, 1980 as document number 177502 . WHEREAS, a roadway from Weinandt Acres First Addition to Marschall Road has been dedicated through the platting of Weinandt Acres Second Addition; and WHEREAS, the City no longer requires the above described easement and the same serves no useful purpose and should be released and discharged of record. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Shakopee City Council that the easement described above be and the same hereby is released and discharged. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a quit claim deed to discharge the same of record be made and signed by the proper City officials and delivered to the present owner of the above described property. Adopted in adjourned regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 16th day of March, 1993 . Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form , City Attorney ROADWAYS WITHIN WSINANDT ACRES 1ST AND 2ND ADDITIONS 29TH AVE , P' (__) Subject Temporary \-\`P Easement "\Ov • \' ,\\ .\ e ,,,,- c,-\-s ‘ 4,,, /y,c,/, , cp' VIKI COURT 0 SANE •_.♦...+.j..-�1. ....._��.T.�i ♦ ...�. w_._____ J-...�....a�..._.._..__._� t�ar. _._a�_. ...�u♦J_� _._.f_•.+.♦.�..u.u. .....�.FY _._ . ..i....r......J. �.�a�i�.R._ ASAI De° ),Za) n Ofi‘ S\t:A ‘ RESOLUTION NO. 3763 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DELIVERY OF A DEED TO EXTINGUISH AN EASEMENT IN WEINANDT ACRES FIRST ADDITION WHEREAS, under date of September 10, 1980, an easement was executed by Harris Weinandt and wife Lillian Weinandt running in favor of the City of Shakopee for the purpose of providing a 60 foot roadway easement, among other things, from Marcia Lane to Marschall Road across Outlot A, Weinandt Acres First Addition, Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota, and said easement was filed for record in the Office of Register of Deeds of Scott County, Minnesota on September 16, 1980 as document number 177502 . WHEREAS, a roadway from Weinandt Acres First Addition to Marschall Road has been dedicated through the platting of Weinandt Acres Second Addition; and WHEREAS, the City no longer requires the said easement and the same serves no useful purpose and should be released and discharged of record. , , VEDby Shakopee W • that theNOWeasement THEREFOREdescribedBEITRESOLin Exhibit, "theA", attached heretoCity and made a part hereof, be and the same hereby is released and discharged. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a quit claim deed to discharge he same of record be made and signed by the proper City officials and delivered to the present owner of the above described property. Adopted in adjourned regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 16th day of March, 1993 . Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form , City Attorney Part of Res. No. 3763 EXHIBIT "A" An easement for road purposes being 60 feet in width the center line of which is described as follows: Commencing at the most westerly corner of Outlot A thence North 38°18'52" East a distance of 400. 95 feet; thence North 18°30'00" East a distance of 30. 00 feet to the point of beginning of said road easement. Thence South 71°30'00" East a distance of 175 feet; thence on a tangential curve to the right having a central angle of 33°15' and a radius of 315. 00 feet a distance of 182.80 feet; thence North 51°45'00" East a distance of 477 feet; thence East a distance of 624. 28 feet to the west right-of-way of Marschall Road and there terminating, the said lines of said easement shall be lengthened or shortened to intersect the west right-of-way of Marschall Road, all in Outlot A of the Plat of Weinandt Acres filed and of record in the Office of the Scott County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota. nistrator S MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kr�a'f` ! t`� J 1 b FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director 1 I. RE: Shakopee Bypass - Stage II B � DATE: March 10, 1993 J INTRODUCTION: MnDOT has requested City of Shakopee approval of the plans and specifications for Stage II B of the Shakopee Bypass as well as execution of Cooperative Agreement No. 70463 covering the City' s cost participation for this stage. BACKGROUND: Stage II B of the Shakopee Bypass consists of the construction of the two bridges at the CSAH 17 and C.R. 83 crossings, as well as reconstructing the County highways within the bypass limits, providing storm sewer and construction of the City' s linear detention ponds along the bypass right-of-way. The plans and specifications for this stage of the project have been completed and MnDOT is proposing to take bids on this stage on April 2 , 1993 . Prior to the bid letting, the City of Shakopee must approve of the plans and specifications . Attached is Resolution No. 3761, which approves of the plans and specifications for this project . MnDOT also is requesting that the City execute Cooperative Agreement No. 70463 covering the City' s cost participation for this stage . According to the terms of the original Memorandum of Understanding, the City will pay for all costs associated with the linear detention ponds, which were designed in conformance with the Mill Pond Drainage Basin Stormwater Management Plan. The City is also required to pay for the appropriate share of the storm sewer costs on the County Highways . The total estimated cost for the City' s share is $822 , 946 . 69, which also includes an 8% engineering fee. The majority of these costs are pond or storm sewer related. The total amount of the project being bid by MnDOT is estimated at $4 . 5 million. Attached is Resolution No. 3762 which authorizes the appropriate City officials to enter into Cooperative Agreement No. 70463 with MnDOT. ACTIONS REQUESTED: 1 . Offer Resolution No. 3761, which approves plans and specifications for Stage II B of the Shakopee Bypass, and move its adoption. 2 . Offer Resolution No. 3762, authorizing the appropriate City officials to execute Cooperative Agreement No. 70463 covering the City' s cost participation in this project for ponds, storm sewers and sidewalk estimated at $822, 946 . 69 . TAMI/BYPASS .DH DH/tiv �,�Nr+Esor1041,6; Minnesota Department of Transportation f Metropolitan District Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 oF TaOHadley akdale Office, 3485 Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 Reply to 593-8503 Telephone No. March 9, 1993 Mr. David E. Hutton, P.E. Public Works Director City of Shakopee 129 E. First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379-1376 Re: S.P. 7005-54 (T.H. 101) Shakopee Bypass (Stage 2B) At CSAH 17 and at Co. Rd 83 in Shakopee Cooperative Construction Agreement No. 70463 and Municipal Plan Approval Dear Mr. Hutton: As you know, Mn/DOT is planning to take bids on April 2, 1993, for the next major contract on the Shakopee Bypass (Stage 2B). This project consists of grading, bituminous surfacing, storm sewer, box culverts and Bridges No. 70014, 70039, and 70040 on two crossroads (CSAH 17 and Co. Rd. 83). It also includes pond and swale construction on Mainline TH 101 between Co. Rd. 79 and CSAH 17. Enclosed are four copies of the proposed Cooperative Construction Agreement No. 70463 with the City of Shakopee. This agreement provides for payment by the City to the State of the City's share of the costs of the pond, swale, storm sewer and walk construction to be performed upon, along and adjacent to CSAH 17, Co. Rd. 83 and T.H. 101 within the corporate City Limits. Three copies need to be executed by the City. The fourth copy is for your use until we get a fully executed copy to you later. Please present this agreement to the City Council for their approval and execution which includes original signatures of the City Council authorized City officers on all three copies of the agreement. Also required are three copies of a new resolution passed by the City Council authorizing its officers to sign the agreement on its behalf. A suggested form of such resolution is enclosed. Also enclosed is a copy of the Construction Plans and Proposal together with a recommend form of resolution for Municipal Plan Approval. Please review the plan documents for presentation to and approval by the City Council. 007 MINNESOTA 1990 An Equal Opportunity Employer Mr. Hutton March 9, 1993 Page 2 Please forward the executed agreement and resolution copies along with the plan approval resolution to me as soon as possible (not later than March 30). We cannot open bids until we have the executed agreement and resolutions "in our hands". If you have any questions, please call me at 593-8503 or Jerry Stark at 593-8496. Sincerely, C. 9triN--4-'"" Timothy C. Johnson, P.E. Final Design Engineer Enclosures TCJ:cml State Project 7005-54 (101=187) Fed. Proj. NH 5407 (31) RESOLUTION NO 3061 APPROVING PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS FOR STAGE IIB OF THE SHAKOPEE BYPASS At a meeting of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, held on the day of 1993, the following Resolution was offered by • seconded by , , to wit: WHEREAS the Commissioner of Transportation for the State of Minnesota has prepared: plans, special provisions, and specifications for the improvement of Trunk Highway No. 187, renumbered as Trunk Highway No. 101, within the corporate limits of the City of Shakopee, at CSAR 17 and at County Road 83; and seeks the approval thereof; NOW, THEN, BE IT RESOLVED that said plans and special provisions for the improvement of said Trunk Highway within said corporate limits of the City, be and hereby are approved including the elevations and grades as shown and consent is hereby given to any and all changes in grade occasioned by said construction. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City does hereby agree to require the parking of all vehicles, if such parking is permitted within the corporate limits of said City, on said Trunk Highway, to be parallel with the curb adjacent to the highway, and at least 20 feet from any crosswalks on all public streets intersecting said trunk highway. Upon the call of the roll, the following council members voted in favor of the Resolution: and, the following council members voted against the adoption of the Resolution: whereupon the mayor and/or the presiding officer declared the Resolution adopted. Dated , 1993 Mayor Attest City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF SCOTT ) CITY OF SHAKOPEE ) _ _ 1-- /_I' __.1__'_7_ 1_ _ _._-1 1_ __7 __ •__ ___ _f____\ _C .L _ 70463 CITY OF SHAKOPEE RESOLUTION NO. 3762 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH MnDOT FOR SHAKOPEE BYPASS COVERING CITY'S COST PARTICIAPTION FOR PONDS, STORMSEWERS AND SIDEWALK BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Shakopee enter into Agreement No. 70463 with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to-wit: To provide for payment by the City to the State of the City's share of the costs of the pond, swale, storm sewer and walk construction and other associated construction to be performed upon, along and adjacent to County State Aid Highway No. 17 (Marschall Road) at its intersection with proposed Trunk Highway No. 101 (Shakopee Bypass) from Engineer Station 1403+43.25 to Engineer Station 1441+00.8, and upon and along County Road No. 83 (Canterbury Downs Boulevard) at its intersection with proposed Trunk Highway No. 101 (Shakopee Bypass) from Engineer Station 25+63.3 to Engineer Station 67+38 within the corporate City limits under State Project No. 7005-54 (T.H. 101=187) and State Aid Project No. 166-020-04. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers are hereby authorized and directed to execute such agreement. CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Scott City of Shakopee I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Shakopee st a sshowduly by the miauthoriznutemseting g thereof held on the day of the meeting in my possession. City Clerk . CONSENT 1 .12 MEMO TO: DENNIS KRAFT, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DAVE HUTTON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: VALLEY PARK 11TH ADDITION C DATE: MARCH 10, 1993 INTRODUCTION Attached is a petition for public improvements as submitted by Mr. Jon Albinson, Valley Green Business Park, for the Valley Park 11th Addition. BACKGROUND On February 16 , 1993 the City Council of Shakopee approved of the final plat of Valley Park 11th Addition, as shown on the attached map. The standard City Developers Agreement allows the developer the choice to construct the public improvements themselves or to petition the City to construct the improvements and to assess the costs back. The owner, Valley Green Business Park, has petitioned the City to construct Park Place from 10th Avenue to 12th Avenue, including street, watermain, sanitary sewer, storm sewers, sanitary and water services, street lighting and electrical service. The street lighting and electrical service will be installed by SPUC and billed directly to the developer, while the other improvements would be constructed by the City and assessed. The petitioners have waived their right to a public hearing prior to ordering the improvements and since they represent 100% of the property owners that would be assessed for this project, no public hearing is required. The plans for these improvements have been prepared by the developers engineer and are approximately 95% completed. Staff has reviewed these plans to make sure they meet City Specifications and there are just a few minor revisions needed yet. SPUC has also reviewed the plans and except for a few minor revisions, the mainline watermain is acceptable to them. There is still an issue with the water services that the developer is attempting to resolve with SPUC staff, SPUC ' s consultant and the City Engineering Staff. Basically, the developer is caught between the SPUC policy regarding water services and the City policy regarding street cuts on new streets (none allowed for 5 years) . Industrial development is different than residential development in that it is difficult to determine the exact size of the lots until a prospective buyer determines the size needed. For that reason, this plat only has 3 large lots, which includes 1 large lot each abutting the new street, Park Place. SPDC policy only allows 1 water service per platted lot or if additional services are installed, any unused services must be removed. But if the developer installs additional services that ultimately would need to be removed, the City' s street cut policy may prohibit it. The street cut policy states that no street will be cut open for 5 years minimum, although the preference is to never cut a street open unless absolutely necessary. City staff is not convinced that removing unused water services is necessary from a health safety viewpoint and before this is done the impacts on the pavement structure by a street cut should be considered. The S . P.U. Commission has directed the SPUC manager to further research this issue regarding the need to remove unused water services. The developer is attempting to resolve this issue with SPUC staff and any changes to the water service design can be made during the construction. As an interim solution, staff could postpone installing the final wear course of asphalt for 1 year to allow the developer and SPUC additional time to research this issue, but the developer does not feel this will be necessary. The Sanitary Sewer Services are not a problem, because additional services will be stubbed out for the future lots and if these services are not utilized, they do not need to be removed. Attached is Resolution No. 3760, which accepts the petition, orders an improvement and authorizes the advertisement for bids for this project. ALTERNATIVES 1 . Adopt Resolution No. 3760 . 2 . Deny Resolution No. 3760 . 3 . Table Resolution No. 3760. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED Offer Resolution No. 3760, a Resolution which accepts the petition, orders an improvement, and authorizes the advertisement for bids for this project and move its adoption. • • VALLEY r'ARK ELEVENTH A D D I TION SgcO, :4.t J r I, �y ti"a UK I .a•aaa.rr \'' 6 t` 'a•r�o'o• „P 5 0� / y/ I I I ;taus L pt t. a.ffa.ir•Sell, Ie� �a`9'faY• i M•�f'3n C M ` / a' • 437 Nrtf J ��yg1� 610.B. H roo .� 2k93Jsti. a•rAt� -t. ----- 06 F'W ;per -7°"'s-'---- Z3!i'11 orf: �: o P :war: A'•� • I.....N'ffa.�a 1 it amen»flaw•aas ;, �• ` / fid. I� N. i G t ; !, a a ^�-� —PARK PLACE .-w i i I ` I e IrTr C. la I —... ...-1. ....... z r.3K ridnd 0401f/M kr lino, Ia • 1 :J 2 �o Ot4. iV i pp O -en Yon ROMMnMfM I _ !V �1, r i 1CALL �N NI LY+n+.Na 141030- 1 1 v x ,I boned*sift jilt:r of a �v I _$ 4 • :• TENTH z J 71 I L • TII: fb��•r=— r •0 .c�...c ..�._..�, n• iti 2 lir; u c1 ��.iM sv V saarasars�ar ..y.A'--ii 'r-- �+ � .-.....�.,�. - E _f. 0x;•41* R.L.S. r�- T R C 7 • • 'ETERS.PRICE&SAMSON LAND SURVEYORS.LTD. o.ANNA SOAK SAVAGE MINNESOTA SAM•Siiiaf>J/ - SHEET 2 OF 2 5 OVallcy . Crccn BUSINESS PARK February 26, 1993 Ms. Judy Cox HAND DELIVERED CITY OF SHAKOPEE 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Petition for Public Improvements Dear Judy: Enclosed is a Petition for Public Improvements for the construction of improvements to Park Place, the new street in the approved Plat of Valley Park 11th Addition. We have reviewed the sequence of events necessary to build this road with Dave Hutton and find that the normal procedure of this Petition being filed with the filing of the Plat and the Developer's Agreement poses too much of a delay in our efforts to provide for the road being completed by August 1, 1993. We are, therefore, submitting this Petition for Public Improvements prior to the Developer's Agreement with the understanding that the public petition will be processed through City Council for the purpose of advertising for bids. We would appreciate this being on the Council agenda no later than March 16 for their action to advertise. We understand the contract for these improvements would not be let prior to the actual filing of the Developer's Agreement. We would find this acceptable inasmuch as the Developer's Agreement will probably be prepared for filing around mid-April. Based on the timeline discussed with Dave Hutton, the sequence of events leading up to the construction of these improvements, based on our submission of this public improvements petition, should accommodate a completion of Park Place by August 1. This would be necessary for the proposed development which will be taking place on the northwest corner of this plat on a portion of Lot 1, Block 1. We understand that a minor subdivision will probably also be necessary and will do so at the appropriate time. Dave Hutton has in his possession a copy of the previous feasibility study done on this project, and should have complete engineering work available as of March 1, per Engelhardt & Associates. I have requested Joe Adams of SPUC expedite his review of these plans inasmuch as they received a copy of the engineering for the watermain quite some time ago but have not responded as yet. 5276 Valley Industrial Boulevard South•Shakopee.Minnesota 55379•Telephone: (612)645-92136• Facsimile:(612)445-9372 0 Ms. Judy Cox Page Two February 26, 1993 If you have any questions, please call. Otherwise, we look forward to being at Council for their action on this item on March 16. Respectfully, V EY GREEN BUSINESS PARK 6A..../ on R. Albinson Project Director JRA:j mcx-041 Enclosure cc: Dave Hutton Lindberg Ekola Karen Marty P.S. Dave, if you want to schedule a planning review meeting on this prior to March 16, please let Engelhardt and me know. CITY OF SHAKOPE EETITION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS The undersigned hereby petitions the City of Shakopee to install the followin improvements where noted and to assess them pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429: . Park Place UiliNigi9SW9Z3Z2K from the existing cul-de-sac to 12th Avenue by constructing 1 )watermain and services, 2) sanitary sewer and services, 3) stormsewer, 4) street lighting and 5) electrical service. (improvements requested) . The undersigned hereby waive the right to a public hearing prior to Council ordering the imporvements and also waives the right to a public hearing prior to the levying of the assessments related to said improvements. The undersigned further voluntarily waives all rights to appeal said assessments which shall be assessed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 as a result of the installation of the above improvements. I/we understand that by signing below I/we waive the right to appeal and later challenge the amount of thespecialasses ent. Dated this A/ day .04435.4 , 1993 . VALLEY GREEN BUSINESS PARK L'IMTr't;ll PARfi RSHIP By: Valley Green Bu/ iness Park Inc_ its ��/�7 c eneraall 8• ., / Bv: iii Its: 7_,' P; STATE OF t ) ) (INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT) COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD =) On this ,yam day of . '� (i_k/ , 19g before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared (JO Qnde( irXwIZ .a.5 Vice R`-3,cl of being sworn, did say that said instrument was executed as their free act and deed. ~ / 2 No ary This instrument was drafted by: . . City of Shakopee JENNIFER E.MUSSER 129 East 1st Avenue Notary Public Shakopee, MN 55379 CONNECTICUT My commission expires JUL 31. 1997 RESOLUTION NO. 3760 A Resolution Declaring the Adequacy of a Petition, Ordering the Improvements and Authorizing the Advertisement for Bids for all Public Improvements located within Valley Park 11th Subdivision Whereas, A certain petition requesting improvements to Park Place, located in Valley Park 11th Subdivision, consisting of street, saniitythe City Counc 1 on March 16, sewer awater vices has been filed wh1993 , and Whereas, the petitioners waive their right to a public hearing prior to ordering the improvements, and Whereas, the plans and specifications for the improvements have been prepared in accordance with City of Shakopee specifications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1 . The petition is hereby declared to be signed by the required percentage of property owners affected by the project and this declaration is made in conformity to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429 . 035 . 2 . The improvements are hereby ordered as hereinafter described: Construction of Park Place within Valley Park 11th subdivision, including street, sanitary sewer, watermain, and sewer and water services. 3 . David E. Hutton, Public Works Director is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement and shall prepare the plans and specifications for the making of such improvements . 4 . That such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file and of record in the Office of the City Engineer, are hereby approved. 5 . The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin and advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements . The Advertisement for Bids shall be published as required by law. Adopted in Regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 16th day of March, 1993 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney 02/22%93 14:20 FAX 612 445 9372 VALLEY GREEN 4-+-> ALLIANZ X008 CITY Of SHAKOPEE PETITION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS The undersigned hereby petitions the City of Shakopee to install the followin improvements where noted and to assess them pursuant to Minnesota statutes Chapter 429 : Park Place ? sW9a} from the existing cul-de_sac to 12th Avenue by constructing 1 )watermain and services, 2) sanitary sewer and services, 3) stormsewer, 4) street lighting and 5) electrical service. (improvements requested) The undersigned hereby waive the right to a public hearing prior to Council ordering the imporvements and also waives the right to a public hearing prior to the levying of the assessments related to said improvements. The undersigned further voluntarily waives all rights to appeal said assessments which shall be assessed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 as a result of the installation of the above improvements. I/we understand that by signing below I/we waive the right to appeal and later challenge the amount of the special asses ent. Dated this 02 y day of /11/.44,, , 1993 . VALLEY GREEN BUSINESS PARK LIMI'rty PARTNERSHIP Sy: Valley Green Bu mess Park Inc. its � general .aj !f/� �� L/r Its: P; STATE OF Ma1iar ) (INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT) COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD -) On this 72./ day of rcbruci.t/ , l99 D before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared ��£',7 de !�• X i 7z LC.5 Vire. Oe/2 t being sworn, did say that said instrument was executed as their free act and deed. j gni vl /. •771 No ary This instrument was drafted by: City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue JENNIFER E.MUSSER ee MN 55379 Notary Public Shakopee, CONNECTICUT My commission expires JUL 31. 1997 Rev. 3/92 CO1\ SENT EXPLANATION TO ORDINANCE 355 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: Law Department PURPOSE: To eliminate the inconsistency in City Code Sec . 2 . 05, Subd. 5 .C. and Subd. 6 . REMARKS: The City Code includes personnel management duties in the City Administrator' s duties . In one section it authorizes the Administrator to make recommendations for terminating or suspending employees, subject to Council approval . In another section, it seems to authorize the Administrator to take the action and simply file a notice with the Council . In order to reconcile these sections, both have been rewritten. The City Administrator, in Sec. 2 . 05, Subd. 5 . C. , is being given authority to suspend employees . Since notice of the suspension is filed with the Council, the Council can revise the action if it thinks that is appropriate. In Sec. 2 . 06, the authority to terminate employees is reserved in the Council, and the Administrator may only make a recommendation. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Ordinance No. , an ordinance amending Chapter 2, Administration and General Government, Sec . 2 . 05, City Administrator, by repealing paragraph C of Subd. 5, Duties, and repealing Subd. 6, Suspensions, Terminations and Appeals, and adopting one new paragraph and subdivision in lieu thereof, relating to the same subject, and move its adoption. Submitted by: /4'4—/M!orp City Attorney , [25MEMO] ORDINANCE NO. 355 , FOURTH SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ADMINISTRATION AND GENERAL GOVERNMENT, SEC. 2 . 05, CITY ADMINISTRATOR, BY REPEALING PARAGRAPH C OF SUBD. 5 . , DUTIES, AND SUBD. 6, SUSPENSIONS, TERMINATIONS AND APPEALS, AND ADOPTING ONE NEW PARAGRAPH AND SUBDIVISION IN LIEU THEREOF, RELATING TO THE SAME SUBJECT. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS : Section 1 - That City Code Chapter 2, Administration and General Government, Sec. 2 . 05, City Administrator, Subd. 5 . , Duties, is hereby amended by repealing paragraph C, and adopting one new paragraph C in lieu thereof, which shall read as follows: "C. Interview and screen all prospective City employees as permitted by law and shall make recommendations to the Council before the Council makes any appointment; suspend employees as necessary; make recommendations for terminating [and suspending] employees and may suspend any employee until the next Council meeting when the Council shall affirm, modify or reject the recommendation for termination [rescind the suspension] . " Section 2 - That City Code Chapter 2, Administration and General Government, Sec. 2 . 05, City Administrator, Subd. 6, Suspensions, Terminations and Appeals, is hereby repealed, and one new subdivision adopted in lieu thereof, which shall read as follows : "Subd. 6 . Suspensions, Terminations and Appeals . Notice of [termination or] suspension and recommendations for termination must be in writing and shall specify the grounds thereof and must be served [forthwith] upon the suspended employee and filed with the Council . The Council shall act on the recommendation for termination at their next meeting. Any Department Head or employee [so] suspended or terminated may request a hearing before the Council by serving ten (10) days' written demand on the Council for such hearing and also by serving such notice on the City Administrator. The Council shall hear such appeal within fourteen (14) days after the service of the notice and shall render its decision within seven (7) days after the hearing is closed. " Note : The bracketed language [thus] is deleted; the underlined language is inserted. Section 3 - General Provisions . City Code Chapter 1, General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty For Violation, and Section 2 . 99, Violation a Misdemeanor, are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 43 - Effective Date . This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1993 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest : City Clerk i Approved as to form: _ �'� ' Agar City Attorney Published in the Shakopee Valley News on the day of , 1992 . [25MEMO] -2- ,Ai_g4 .1,5-,-„, ItiL: AA A 4i METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ds�i-: Mean Par( Centre. 230 fast Fifth Street. Sr. Paul. tl.\ 55101-1634 612 291-6359 F-IX 61' 291-6550 77Y 613 291-0904 DATE: March 12, 1993 TO: Persons Interested in Revision of the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework SUBJECT: Discussion Paper - Options for Change Last fall the Metropolitan Council began examining and revising the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework (MDIF), the Council's regional growth management plan. The MDIF sets forth Council policy for managing the region's resources -- its highways,sewers, parks, airports, solid waste facilities -- and the public dollars spent on them. Since then, the Council has been working to identify significant regional revitalization and growth issues that should be addressed in a revised development and investment framework. Council staff has prepared the enclosed discussion paper suggesting different options for guiding future development and change in the region. Options for Change is not a plan or draft framework. It is a discussion paper. We have used a few important issues to demonstrate how either of the two options would affect a new framework. A discussion about the options will help the Council identify effective approaches it might take for dealing with issues in the new framework. Because of your interest in regional issues, the Council would like your reaction to these options and their implications for how the Council manages growth. We will hold informal discussions with several organizations around the region in March and April, but also invite you to comment via facsimile or through participation in meetings we are holding in April. On Friday, April 2, from 8:30 a.m. to noon, we will hold a planning forum in the Metropolitan Council Chambers, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul (see map on opposite side). Because the meeting format is one of small group discussion, we need to reserve adequate meeting space. Please r.s.v.p. for this forum by calling our Research and Long Range Planning Department at 291-6363. We also will hold a public meeting to receive comments from individuals and organizations on Wednesday, April 14 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. If you have any questions about the Options for Change paper or the revision process, please call Anne Hurlburt, manager of our Comprehensive Planning Division at 291-6501. We look forward to hearing your thoughts about this very important topic. Sincerely, ‘.- g- z Dottie Rietow Chair DR/gp 2DR030d43 Enclosure Recycled Paper _ n H (3E-. arii V U c a 047 \I C. > H 7 r: '---1) E--. a. -d 3 = o > _ oa c , y y � = o3G° •� c o a, ta C CC C '= C ,....4 0::0 :: i.-.. C - Q L G1 _? L r Y, c s N U 'SCLC' 74‘si L X - \ Avl \ ,-,..f„.„,.,- S a 0 1. o'70LCfol �I.. 1j *54- 7, '2' ''\t \io 4.„ 41 ..c ei"-s- O. * "' l 10 rs,.. 4.t,S -‘ r.--r) 4 AP" No ` r c E-'c 0 s41P' 10 yL o / mmo r •L G-. 4111111kr V -i _ U �,ti U VI c o CO pplo /7 i . ::>:,,,41.). H -- 3J �` c3 _s — co �C• \ c cr c h r Ua c is U c c c > >, 7 E- c F.-. E� L Options for Change: Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework Public Discussion Paper • Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St. St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612 291-6359 TDD 291-0904 Publication No. 640-93-035 March 11, 1993 --- - - -- -:- - r.Ti- _r:' ^.-^ ?.r,—;`'`''—."r.r-.e-.:..::.-.r:✓-_ti.r-s.�s=.:x.,r_.�as�.es.;4' ...- -:.:r..a.._ - -- - . .... � _. ,+cam; .._ .�-'- — - Metropolitan Council Members Dottie Rietow, Chair Stephen B. Wellington, Jr., District 1 Dede Wolfson, District 2 _ Patrick C. Leung, District 3 Carol A. Kummer, District 4 Martha M. Head, District 5 Barbara Butts Williams, District 6 Esther Newcome, District 7 Susan Anderson, District 8 Roger Scherer, District 9 Jim Krautkremer, District 10 Polly Peterson Bowles, District 11 Sondra R. Simonson, District 12 Mary H. Smith, District 13 Bonnie D. Featherstone, District 14 Kevin Howe, District 15 E. Craig Morris, District 16 Tough Challenges...and a Framework for Change The Twin Cities area is a good place to live--highly rated schools, fine parks, advanced health care and a strong sense of community. It's near the top of the list in many national rankings. And, most important, people who live here give it high marks. But it's also facing tough challenges. For example: • In a recent letter to the St. Paul Pioneer Press, two long-time St. Paul residents said that living conditions in the city were forcing them to leave. They pointed to high taxes, poor services, junk tires in front yards and "sloppy, run-down rental properties." Not all parts of the central cities have these problems, but there are growing concerns about decay in the older parts of our region. • Developers of a housing development in a St. Paul suburb diverted water drainage away from a local tamarack bog. As a result, the bog was eventually destroyed. Despite strong environmental laws, the region's precious natural heritage is slipping away. • A company in one city was persuaded to relocate to another because of tax-supported subsidies. In this competition, the region as a whole didn't get any new jobs or tax base. They were just shuffled from one city to another. The list goes on. For example: - • Many poor people, especially in Minneapolis and St. Paul, can't get to where the new jobs are--in the region's fast-growing suburbs. • The leaders of some cities would like to see their communities get a bigger share of the region's future jobs and people. • As people move out to rural areas, many of them demand all the benefits of city services, even though it may cost more to provide those services. There are other issues, too. But they all have something in common. They hold the key to revitalizing the region and making sure it grows in ways that benefit everyone. The region has to meet those challenges if it hopes to keep strong and successful in future years. A New Framework The Metropolitan Council, the Twin Cities planning and coordinating agency, is taking a lead role in dealing with these challenges, to shape the future of the region. Last year it talked with many people and groups to get their opinions about what issues are facing the region. Now the Council is working on a framework for change to deal with those issues--a "metropolitan development and investment framework." The framework will replace the one the Council adopted in 1986. This discussion paper is a stepping stone on the path to a new framework. The Council realizes that the "physical" networks that hold the region together--the highways and the sewer systems, for example--are important to the region's future. But it also realizes it must look at social and economic issues. The broad scope of the Council's effort can be seen in four important values the Council spotlighted in its Metro 2015 goals for the region, adopted by the Council last year. The framework is a first step toward making the Metro 2015 goals a reality. 1 The four values are the foundation for the new framework: Healthy communities--strengthen the economic and social health of communities, and their quality, safety and vitality. Economic growth--increase the number of jobs and tax base in the region. Environmental quality—protect the environment and use natural resources to shape new development Efficient, effective government services--rethink and redesign government services so that customers (taxpayers) get the best value for their money. What's in This Discussion Paper This paper is not a plan. It is not a draft of the framework. It suggests ideas for action that the Council can build on for drafting a framework. The paper doesn't suggest ideas for all the issues the Council thinks are important It focuses on a few: • Strengthening the health of the region's older areas, including the central cities; • Developing a regional economic strategy that would help the region as a whole gain new jobs; • Respecting the environment; and • Investing in public facilities like airports and sewer systems. The Council wants to get a sense of whether its general approach to these key issues is workable. If so, the Council can use that approach to come up with ideas for other issues. What We'd Like from You Solving the region's problems requires the best thinking of concerned people and organizations. We'd like your reaction to how strong a role government and the private sector should play in trying to solve these problems. As you read this paper, please think about the following questions: • Which ideas do you think would be most effective in solving the problems facing the region? • Which ideas should be explored further by the Council as it develops the framework? • Which problems would require the strongest actions to solve them? We plan to hold two forums on this discussion paper: - April 2--for informal discussions in small groups, and - April 14--a public meeting for people to make formal presentations. We will also hold informal discussions with organizations around the region. To give us your comments, you can FAX your response to the Council (291-6464), or write to the Council at this address: Framework Metropolitan Council 230 E Fifth St. St Paul MN 55101 The Council hopes to hold public hearings on a draft framework in October, then adopt a plan in December. It expects to make recommendations to the 1994 Minnesota Legislature for carrying out the framework. How Do We Get There? This paper sketches out two options for guiding the revitalization and growth of the region. They are really two 'ends" of a range of choices. There are certainly other options, but the Council thinks these represent the range of the most workable solutions. Both options are intended to reach the same basic goals for the region. But they differ in the specific ideas each would use to do that. Range of Options Option 1: Option 2: 'Responding to 'Shaping the Market Forces' •••••••••••••••••••••••••• Region' This paper suggests different ideas for each option. The best solution for a problem may be a blend of ideas from each option, maybe more from "1" to deal with one problem, more of "2" to deal with another. In short, it's likely the Council will "mix and match" options to come up with the best solution. Both options are stronger than the Council's current framework. They provide stronger incentives or controls to deal with the growth and revitalization of the region. Under either option, the Council would become more active in taking steps to achieve goals that benefit the region as a whole. Option 1: "Responding to Market Forces" Option 1 emphasizes responding to trends of the private market, while compensating for some of the market's undesirable side-effects. While Option 1 would influence market trends to some degree, it would not control or direct them. Ideas for influencing market trends would emphasize the following: • Use incentives to influence market Option 1: Responding to Market Forces decisions and to address social and economic problems. • Work to remove barriers that get in the Influence market trends with way of the private market bringing about Incentives; redistribute dollars to address problems needed changes. , ,. • Anticipate the needs for public services generated by market trends, and make sure they can be provided as effectively and efficiently as possible. • Develop policies and programs to lessen the negative effects of market trends, such as: redistributing dollars to help "needy" areas; providing services, such as housing assistance, 3 expanding transit, increasing social services, matching people with jobs in other parts of the region_ Option 2: "Shaping the Region" Option 2 counters the trends of the private market, where necessary. Rather than reacting to the trends and compensating for them, the Council would proactively pursue its goals for how the region should grow and change. Ideas for shaping the region would emphasize the following: • Take positive steps to deal with social and economicroblems. Make sure that every ry Option 2: Shaping the Region part of the region contains a mix of opportunities (for example, housing, jobs, Counter market trends through shopping, schools) for people of all regional policies and investments incomes and at all stages of their life (for example, young couples with children, middle-aged "empty nesters" with grown- up children, elderly people who may have some trouble getting around). Each part of the region would look more like the region as a whole. • Use additional dollars for services that are needed to make all areas of the region attractive and safe, especially the older parts of the region like the central cities. • Make the region's pattern of development more compact and efficient than the one current market trends have produced. This would be done through additional regional controls on development. • Expand the urban part of the region only in limited circumstances. Fewer opportunities for development at the edge of the region would make filling in remaining vacant land and redevelopment more competitive and strengthen the value of existing homes and businesses. Possible Council Roles • The roles of the Council to carry out its policies and plans would be different under Option 1 and Option 2. The same would be true for other agencies, organizations and individuals that have a part in molding the region's future. Choosing Option 1 or 2 will set the range of possible roles that the Council will explore further as it develops policies to address the issues facing the region. The roles that the Council could play fall into five general categories: Managing and Regulating Activities This role would give the Council the most control over an outcome. It would include: • Developing and carrying out programs; or building, operating and maintaining a regional system (for example, the Council's activities to provide lower-income people with housing 4 assistance through its Metro Housing and Redevelopment Authority, also, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's responsibilities for the regional sewer system). • Regulatory or administrative programs (for example, the Council "certifies" that a facility like a waste-to-energy plant is needed before it can be built). Reviewing the Programs and Plans of Other Governmental Units This gives the Council some control but less than the one above. It includes: • Reviewing programs or plans of other agencies and local governments to make sure they carry out regional policies (for example, the Council's review of local comprehensive plans and its review of metro agency implementation plans). Giving Technical Assistance This role hinges on providing information. It includes: • Carrying out research and providing information that affect the entire region (for example, the Council's research efforts and its Data Center). • Making technical expertise available to individual communities or operating agencies (for example, training programs). • Proposing models that can be imitated (for example, model ordinances, demonstration projects, manuals). Providing Funds This creates an incentive for other agencies to carry out policies. It includes: • Providing funds for programs carried out by others, such as low interest loans (for example, the Council's planning assistance loan program). • Administering funding programs paid for by others (for example, the Council's role in distributing funds for programs serving elderly people). Coordinating Activities and Resolving Disputes These can be effective when there is opportunity for agreement, but an agreement can't be imposed. They include: • Creating forums for sharing ideas (for example, the Council's State of the Region event). • Developing and adopting intergovernmental agreements for sharing authority or dollars (for example, the Council's work to create the 911 emergency phone system). • Operating a "clearinghouse" for information (for example, the Intergovernmental Resource Center). • Taking an active role in solving problems cooperatively (for example, regional trunked radio). • Resolving disagreements among local governments and regional agencies (for example, the Council's "metropolitan significance" reviews of projects affecting more than one city). 5 SUMMARY • OPTION L OPTION L RESPONDING TO MARKET FORCES SHAPING THE REGION CURRENT FRAMEWORK • Influences market forces to address • Uses direct intervention to address • Uses regional systems like highways social and economic problems. social and economic problems. and sewers to promote orderly and economic development; does not address social and economic problems directly. • Emphasizes incentives and removing • Uses controls or regulation. • Emphasizes coordinating regional barriers to influence market forces. systems and local plans; does not use direct incentives or regulations. • Puts few constraints on market; local • Directs market based on regional goals. • Same as Option 1. governments and development community direct development. • Redistributes dollars to needy areas to • Redistributes development to counter • Distributes dollar investments in reduce the undesirable effects of the market trends. regional systems like sewers and market. highways based on priorities for different parts of the region. • Decentralizes problem-solving. • Provides greater regional direction and • Same as Option 1. authority; includes involvement in areas like education and economic development. • Continues to expand urban • Allows less expansion at fringe; more • Same as Option 1. development in response to market redevelopment and filling in of demand at the "fringe" of the urban remaining vacant land; higher densities area; continued low- density in existing commercial centers and along development major highways; expansion of urban area only if it would provide full range of services,jobs and housing. • Plans for construction of sewers and • Uses existing regional facilities first; • Same as Option 1. highways at locations and capacities to focuses new investments in locations support market demands. that meet regional goals. • Increases access to jobs by building new • Increase access to jobs by building more • No corresponding policy. roads and expanding transit service. housing where the jobs are, and locating more jobs where the housing is. • Provides information to promote the • Provide job training and targeted • Gives priority to regional facilities that region's business climate. economic development efforts. serve economic development rather than residential development. • Reduces the environmental harm • *Design with nature" to incorporate • Supports maintaining environmental caused by development. environmental features into quality but docs not have specific development decisions. strategies to achieve the goal. • Emphasizes Council role of reviewing • Emphasizes Council roles of • Same as Option 1. plans of other governmental units, implementing and regulating activities, providing technical assistance and reviewing plans of other governmental coordinating the activities of others. units, providing technical assistance and coordinating the activities of others. 6 How the Options Compare How would Option 1 and Option 2 deal with some of the major problems facing the region? Some ideas for action are listed under each option. These ideas are only examples; there are many others that were raised in discussions the Council had last year with many individuals and groups--for example: • "Balancing" growth around the region instead of having it occur in a few areas. • Improving people's access to jobs from where they live, and looking at what that means for transportation in the region. • How we organize ourselves through government to deal with important regional issues. • Making social services and other public services more efficient and effective, such as coordinating school building needs. The Council intends to deal with those issues in the framework, even though they may not be discussed here. Issue: Strengthening the Social and Economic Health of Older Areas • Of the 255,000 new jobs the region gained in the 1980s, only 5,000 went to Minneapolis and St. Paul. Most of the rest went to the fast-growing suburbs. • Minneapolis and St. Paul have only 28 percent of the region's population but half of its poor people. Parts of the central cities and older suburbs are experiencing trends that threaten the health and vitality of the entire region. There's a widening gap between the condition of the older areas of the region and the newer suburbs. The central cities have a deepening and spreading concentration of poverty. They have greater needs for certain kinds of public services (especially for children). Their public facilities—streets and sewers, for example—are old and expensive to maintain. The central cities are in a worsening financial position to deal with the problems they face. Option 1: Give more aid and investment incentives to older areas, but allow growth to happen as it has in the past where the market is strongest. Ideas for Strategies: • Provide aid to needy areas, drawing on the wealth of better-off areas. For example, Option 1: Give more aid and investment- : w change the tax-base-sharing "fiscal incentives to older areas, but Iet growth . .'' disparities" law to provide additional aid to happen where the market is strongest cities based on their social and economic % need Or fund programs to strengthen older areas through taxes or fees collected on new development. 7 • Target incentives--such as tax-increment financing, enterprise zones or reduced prices for public services—to make older areas more attractive for development. • Remove or reduce barriers to encourage redevelopment. For example, help pay the clean-up costs of businesses moving to locations possibly contaminated by pollution. Council Roles: • Reviewing programs and plans of other governmental units. • Providing technical assistance. • Providing funds. • Coordinating activities and resolving disputes. Option 2: Direct development so that all areas provide services and housing for people of all incomes. Slow development in the growing suburbs to maintain property values of existing housing, especially in central cities and older suburbs. Ideas for Strategies: Option 2: Direct development so all • Upgrade public services in older areas areas rovide services and housingfor PH.' (safety and security, education, people of all Incomes; slow development neighborhood amenities, historic in growing suburbs { preservation) to attract people of all incomes. • Give areas that aren't already providing a "fair share" of lower-income housing a target number of such units they must provide. Enact programs to make sure they are built. • Put tight restrictions on expanding the region's urban service area. For example, an expansion might be allowed only when it promotes the goal of "balanced" communities with a full range of housing, jobs and services. • Remove blighted properties to create redevelopment sites for commercial or industrial firms to create jobs. Council Roles: • Same as Option 1, plus: • Managing and regulating activities. Current Framework Policies • Encourage opportunities for people of all incomes to live and work throughout the region, but does not have strategies to make that happen. • Emphasize regional systems like sewers and highways as way to maintain the older portions of the region; does not address social and economic problems directly. • Rely on local governmental units for strategies to redevelop older areas. • Do not have strong "carrots" or "sticks" to encourage revitalization. • Council role is limited to reviewing plans of other governmental units, technical assistance. 8 Issue: Designing a Regional Economic Strategy • Many efforts of different organizations are under way in the Twin Cities area to attract new businesses and encourage existing businesses to expand, to create new jobs and tax base. But these efforts are focused on different local areas of the region, and not necessarily on boosting the total of new jobs and economic base in the region as a whole. There may be a need for the Twin Cities area to create and carry out a regional strategy for economic development and redevelopment. With no regional plan or approach, cities in the region often compete against each other to attract development and redevelopment. In this competition, cities subsidize a business to attract it, but there may be no net gain for the region. A regional strategy could better position the region to find its niche and compete in the global economy. Such a strategy should address the many ingredients needed for economic growth, like a well-trained work force, or a transportation system that links the region to world markets. A regional economic strategy might promote telecommunications as a key regional system to support economic development. Option 1: Provide basic public services to support business and improve the business climate to promote economic development and redevelopment. Ideas for Strategies: • Make sure the region has adequate, state-of- the-art public facilities that support Option 1: Provide basic public services development, focusing on services to support business and improve the traditionally within the authority of regional business climate to promote economic development(sewers, highways, transit, .. ._lopment and redevelopment airports and parks). • Anticipate trends that are affecting the region's economy and develop public policies that react to them. • Look for ways to improve the business climate. For example, reducing restrictive regulations and easing the corporate tax burden. • Promote the attractiveness of the Twin Cities area to business. Council Roles: • Reviewing programs and plans of other governmental units. • Providing technical assistance. Option 2: Provide basic services to support business but also target additional areas for government action to promote economic development and redevelopment. Ideas for Strategies: Option 2: Provide basic services to • Include ideas under Option 1, plus do the support business but also target following: additional areas for government action to • Determine what makes the region well promote economic development and positioned to succeed in the world economy redevelopment (for example, work force, resources, location, existing industry) and target efforts to those areas. 9 _ _ ,--._-.----ems;=F=-�_.�_ . _�•�.--�--- • Make sure that the region has vital services not traditionally within the authority of regional government. For example, telecommunications. • Encourage the business community, educators and state government to work together to make sure that the region's workers are prepared to compete in the world economy. • Reduce unhealthy competition among the region's cities for economic development. • Pursue economic development efforts that will increase the region's total number of jobs and strengthen its economic vitality. Council Roles: • Same as Option 1, plus: • Managing and regulating activities. • Providing funds. Current Framework Policies • Make sure region has adequate public facilities that support development, specifically sewers, highways, transit, airports and parks. • Develop policies in response to trends that affect the region's economy. • Could change investment priorities for different parts of the region to take advantage of economic development opportunities, but does not search out such opportunities. Issue: Respecting the Environment • In a Twin Cities suburb, a large stand of trees was cut down and many wetlands were drained and filled to build a shopping center. Water running off the parking lot now goes into a nearby lake, rather than being absorbed and filtered through the wetlands. The project went through the necessary environmental reviews but was approved without changes that would have protected the local natural features. There are numerous governmental agencies that are responsible for environmental protection and environmental regulations are "piecemeal." As a result, expectations that developers have to meet aren't always clear, and some environmental protections "fall through the cracks." For example, there is no consistent policy for protecting environmentally sensitive bluffs and steep slopes along the region's major rivers and streams. Also, because environmental regulations are fragmented, a project may have to be delayed until it gets all the necessary environmental permits. Most environmental regulations emphasize reducing the negative effects of development. The challenge is to design development projects so that natural features are "built into" the project as an asset, rather than as something to overcome. Option 1: Rely on local comprehensive plans to give guidance to the private market to reduce environmental harm. Ideas for Strategies: Option 1: Use local plans to give guidance to • Require city, township and county private market to reduce environmental harm plans to include protections for environmental features in their comprehensive plans. Private developers take their guidance from those plans. 10 • Incorporate protection of natural resources in all regional plans. For example, transportation and sewers. Council Roles: • Reviewing programs and plans of other governmental units. The Council would require changes to local plans if they affect a resource that's important to the region as a whole. • Providing technical assistance. • Coordinating activities and resolving disputes. Option 2: Provide strong direction from the regional Ievel to the private market about how and where it's appropriate to build. Ideas for Strategies: Wit Option 2 Provide strong direction to private v ,vi; Provide strongdirection for • market about how and where it's appropriate tti "designing with nature" through a build region-wide plan. Plan would rf provide guidance for private and public development based on the suitability and sensitivity of the environment (air, land and water). The scope of a regional plan would be expanded to include features that aren't adequately protected now, like steep slopes and bluffs. • Require local comprehensive plans to be consistent with the regional plan. Council Roles: • Same as Option 1, plus: • Managing and regulating, by developing and carrying out a regional environmental plan. Current Framework Policies • Share goal of protecting environment as in Options 1 and 2, but environment is not a focus of the framework. For example, framework supports environmental quality in development decisions, but does not have strategies to achieve goal. Issue: Investing in Public Facilities The Council makes many decisions about the need for public facilities in the region, like highways and transit, sewers, airports and water supplies. The framework needs to give the Council guidance in making those decisions. Other facilities may require some regional direction, including libraries and schools. The examples below cover sewers and airports. Sewers • Water in the ground or runoff from rain often seeps or flows into sewer pipes of the regional sewer system. This relatively "clean" water is added to the sewage carried in the pipes and increases the amount of waste water going to sewage treatment plants. This can increase the need to expand sewer lines and treatment plants before they would otherwise have to be. 11 Central sewer service is vital for most urban-scale development.. The framework must try to make the regional sewer system as cost-effective and efficient as possible. It must look at the system's relationship to other vital services (such as transportation) and the region's development pattern. The framework must also deal with the water quality of the rivers where sewage plants discharge treated waste. Option 1: Provide new or expanded sewer services in response to market forces and local plans. Ideas for Strategies: 4�tw x • Expand sewage treatment plants and Option w 1•• Provide neor anded sewer# �P extend regional sewer lines to support services in response to market forces and:;;::: growth forecasted by the Council. seivc °slocal plans • Oversee the regional sewer system to .h , make it more efficient to reduce the need for and cost of service. Council Roles: • Reviewing programs and plans of other governmental units. • Providing funds through bond sales. • Coordinating activities and resolving disputes. Option 2: Use the sewer system as a tool to shape the region's development pattern, rather than respond to market forces and local plans. Ideas for Strategies: • Provide new or expanded sewer service only to carry out overall regional •Option 2: Use the sewer system as aiol " objectives. For example, to slow growth to achieve overall regional planning } at the urban fringe or to "balance' objectives �``: growth in the region. • Do not provide new or expanded sewer service when there is available capacity elsewhere in the region or where the framework does not encourage development. • Evaluate the cost of new or expanded sewer service based on cost-effectiveness and how much it would affect the water quality of the region's rivers. • As in option A, oversee the regional sewer system to make it more efficient to reduce the need for and cost of service. Council Roles: • Same as Option 1. Current Framework Policies • Same as Option 1. 12 .•, .. - . ,.a-:=x.-_c:....: - ..=-r.,-_--.,r >- .'r.= .r.. -- -- .-.rte—--• -r. ==- -_.. - ....:..�.-a-'^: Airports The Council is participating in an effort to determine how best to meet the region's future airport capacity needs—whether additional airport capacity is needed and, if so, whether to expand the current airport or build a new one in Dakota County. A decision will be made after completing the "dual-track" planning process undertaken by the Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commksion. Under current law, it will conclude in 1996, when the Minnesota Legislature will decide how to best meet the long-term airport needs of the region. A. Expansion of Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport One alternative under study is to expand Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP). Some existing development, particularly in Minneapolis and Richfield, would make it difficult to expand the airport further. Any effort to expand MSP must look at how affected land use in adjacent areas can be changed to lessen the impact of airport development and operations, including safety, roads to the airport, aircraft noise and storm water runoff. In addition, expansion efforts must also look at new development to make sure that it is compatible with airport development and operation. Option 1: Provide incentives for local governments and land owners to develop and redevelop affected land to reduce the effects of airport development and operation, including safety and aircraft noise. Ideas for Strategies: • Encourage local governments to make land use adjacent to an expanded airport more compatible with airport operations by using incentives to promote the redevelopment of incompatible (primarily existing residential) uses. • Provide incentives to landowners to lessen the impacts of airport operations. For example, redevelopment, sound-proofing, changed building design. Council Roles: Option 1: Provide incentives to develop • k Reviewing local comprehensive plans. and redevelop land to reduce effects of mf:: • Coordinating activities. airport development and operation • Resolving disputes between local .., " governments and the airport operator. Option 2: Require local governments to plan for developing and redeveloping affected land and by providing regional assistance to local redevelopment efforts. Ideas for Strategies: • Require local comprehensive plans to be consistent with regional plans for the development and operation of the region's major airport. • Provide incentives to landowners to lessen the impacts of airport operations. For example, redevelopment, sound-proofing, changing building design. • Establish and carry out regional programs to directly assist Option 2: Require local governments to redevelopment efforts of local plan for developing and redeveloping g governments, such as financing for land to reduce effects of airport acquiring land. development and operation 13 Council Roles: • Managing and regulating, including developing and carrying out a regional plan for areas affected by the airport's development and operation. • Reviewing local comprehensive plans. • Coordinating activities and resolving disputes. • Providing funds for redevelopment and other efforts. Current Framework Policies • The current framework does not specifically address expansion of MSP because it was adopted before the dual-track process began. B. A Possible New Major Airport Another alternative under study is to build a new major airport in Dakota County if it is needed to meet future air-travel demand. This is the other track of the "dual-track" planning process. Under this alternative, the Council must determine what it thinks is the best way to coordinate a potential new airport with existing development. The existing airport is a major employer and produces a great deal of highway traffic. In addition, over time, airports typically produce a significant amount of"spin-off' development that also translates into jobs. The major question for the region is where this development occurs--within the current urban area, in an expanded urban area, or within an "island" (on the airport property but separate from the urban area). Because the Council has authority in the three to five miles around a new airport, it is in a better position to influence the timing, location and type of new development around a new airport than it is with other development. Option 1: If a new airport is built, direct spin-off development to locate along highways connecting it to already developed areas or in existing commercial and industrial areas. Ideas for Strategies: • Do not add any land initially to the urban service area as a result of a decision to build a new airport, because little spin-off development will occur for many years. • Support development that will occur in later years by: - expanding the urban service area in designated locations along major highways connecting the airport to the remainder of the developed portion of the region, or - encouraging development to locate in existing commercial industrial areas with convenient access to the airport. • Encourage development of transit routes to reduce reliance on the automobile for transportation links to the airport. Council Roles: Option 1: Direct spin-off development • Managing and regulating, including from a new airport to connecting developing and carrying out a regional highways or existing commercial and plan for areas affected by the airport's industrial areas development and operation. • Reviewing local comprehensive plans. 14 • Coordinating activities and resolving disputes between local governments and the Council. Option 2: If a new airport is built, restrict development around the airport site; direct spin- off development to locate within the current urban service area. Ideas for Strategies: • Develop a new airport as an "island" by preserving agricultural land between the Otzon 2.:.'Restiict development around airport and the urban part of the region a new • :airportand preserve farmiartd Restrict development around the airport the.airport and the urban part site to only those activities that must be of region: located there (aviation support facilities such as freight handlers) and accommodate them within the airport site. Direct spin-off development to locate within the existing urban service area. • Focus on redeveloping the MSP site as well as filling in existing commercial and industrial employment centers, rather than developing land near a new airport site. • Link a new airport to the developed portion of the region with a high-speed transit line. Council Roles: • Same as Option 1. Current Framework Policies • The current framework does not specifically address building a new airport because it was adopted before the dual-track process began. • • 15 More Information The Council's Work to Date The Council began its work to update the framework in 1992 by developing a set of goals for the region. These goals describe what the region should be and what is should offer its citizens by the year 2015. These goals, developed with the help of many organizations and individuals between March and September of 1992, are contained in Metro 2015: Vision and Goals. The Vision and Goals describes what the region could be; they do not explain how we will get there. A revised framework is the first step in carry out that vision in all of the planning that the Council does. Immediately after completing the goal-setting effort of Metro 2015, the Council held many discussions on issues to be addressed by the new framework. Many issues were identified during public discussion of Metro 2015 as central to achieving the vision. Others were identified by the Council when the framework was last revised, in 1986, or in other planning efforts (such as the Council's recent water-related planning efforts, transit and airports planning). To encourage discussion, the Council issued a report (Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework, Staff Report: Background and Issues) in September 1992. Public forums were targeted to local government staff and officials and to the development and real estate community. The report was discussed with all of the Council's advisory committees, as well as with many other groups such as the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and the Twin Cities Developers Council. Reactions to the issues were discussed by the Council and summarized in a report (Comments on the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework Background and Issues Paper, Staff Summary) at the end of 1992. More Details About Next Steps During March and April, the Council will seek ideas and reactions from the public about the two options described in this discussion paper. The Council will hold public forums and get reactions in a variety of other ways, including presentations to many of the same groups that were involved in developing Metro 2015 and in identifying issues for revising the framework. At the end of this discussion phase, the Council will give its direction on preferred options through its framework Work Group and Committee of the Whole. In making its decisions, the Council will consider the public comments it has received, as well as the criteria it has developed based on its vision and goals. The schedule is for the Council to make these decisions by May 1, 1993. Following the Council's direction, the Council staff and the Work Group will conduct additional study and develop specific proposals through a number of issue papers. These papers will discuss: • Linking jobs and housing, and the implications for transportation. • The relationship of the environment to development and redevelopment. • The relationship of human investments to development and redevelopment. • Economic development and investments in public infrastructure. • Regional governance and finance. • Strategies for implementation. 16 The Council will seek public comments on these proposals through public meetings tentatively scheduled for August. A draft of the new framework will be prepared for formal public hearings, expected to be held in October. The Council hopes to adopt a new framework by the end of 1993, and be prepared to make recommendations to the Minnesota Legislature for any actions needed in the 1994 session. Read More About It For more background information, you may want to look at the following publications. All are available from the Council's Data Center (291-8140). Metro 2015: Vision and Goals Publication no. 640-92-104 Metro 2015: Vision and Goals: Summary Publication no. 640-92-104A Trouble at the Core: The Twin Cities Under Stress Publication no. 310-92-116 Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework (adopted 1986) Publication no. 640-88-122 Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework Summary Publication no. 310-90-077 Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework, Staff Report: Background and Issues Publication no. 640-92-097 Comments on the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework Issues Paper Publication no. 640-92-133 Evaluation of the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework Publication no. 640-93-031 Inventory of Human Investment in the Twin Cities Area Publication no. 400-92-112 Summary of Human Investment in the Twin Cities Area Publication no. 400-92-113 Inventory of Twin Cites Metropolitan Area Public School Facilities Publication no. 400-92-109 The Twin Cities Area in Perspective Publication no. 400-92-134 17