HomeMy WebLinkAboutJanuary 31, 2001 TENTATIVE AGENDA
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
ADJ. REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 31, 2001
LOCATION: 129 Holmes Street South
Mayor Jon Brekke presiding
11 Roll Call at 5:00 p.m.
2] Pledge of Allegiance
31 Approval of Agenda
4] Mayor's Report
51 Approval of Consent Business — (All items noted by an * are anticipated to be routine. After a
discussion by the Mayor, there will be an opportunity for members of the City Council to
remove items from the consent agenda for individual discussion. Those items removed will be
considered in their normal sequence on the agenda. Those items remaining on the consent
agenda will otherwise not be individually discussed and will be enacted in one motion.)
6] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS — (Limited to five
minutes per person/subject. Longer presentations must be scheduled through the City Clerk.
As this meeting is cablecast, speakers must approach the microphone at the podium for the
benefit of viewers and other attendees.)
*7] Approval of Minutes — none
8] Personnel Issues
a. Adoption of Resolution Terminating Daniel Schumacher as Ice Arena Maintenance Operator
b. Resignation of Planner I, Beth Thorp
91 Discussion of Residential Development Proposals, Implementation of Planned Residential
Districts, Setbacks
10] Discussion on Prior Lake Outlet Channel Feasibility Study Analysis — Please bring your
feasibility report from the January 9 meeting.
11 ] Council Concerns
121 Other Business
13] Adjourn o February 6, 2001
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Alfemnrandum
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Termination
DATE: January 25, 2001
FQFff : f 1 e - Y [ /]
The Council is asked to adopt a resolution terminating the employment of Daniel
Schumacher, Ice Arena Maintenance Worker.
Dan Schumacher was hired in August as the City's Ice Arena Maintenance Worker. As
with all employees, he was subject to an initial six -month probationary period.
Based on performance, Mr. Schumacher was notified on January 18 by Facilities and
Recreation Director Mark Themig that his probationary period had not been successfully
completed, and that his services were no longer needed as of that day.
In order to make this official, Council should adopt the attached resolution.
If the Council concurs, it should, by motion, adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 5478
A RESOLUTION TERMINATING THE EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF
PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEE DAN SCHUMACHER
Mark McNeill
City Administrator
RESOLUTION NO. 5478
A RESOLUTION TERMINATING THE EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF
PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEE DAN SCHUMACHER
WHEREAS, Dan Schumacher was employed by the City of Shakopee beginning
August 9, 2000; and
WHEREAS, all non - police employees are placed on six month probationary
status; and
WHEREAS, Dan Schumacher has not satisfactorily completed the probationary
period of the City of Shakopee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and the City Council of
the City of Shakopee that the employment status of Dan Schumacher be terminated
effective January 18, 2001, with payment for unused vacation to be made to him.
Adopted in
Shakopee, Minnesota, held this
day of , 2001.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
session of the City Council of the City of
City Clerk
CONSENT 3. b
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Resignation of Planner I, Beth Thorp
MEETING DATE: January 31, 2001
Introduction:
By letter dated January 15, 2001, Beth Thorp tendered her resignation from the position
of Planner I effective January 29, 2001. Council is asked to accept Ms. Thorp's
resignation with regret, and authorize the appropriate city officials to take the necessary
steps to fill the vacated position.
Action Requested:
Council is asked to accept Ms. Thorp's resignation with regret, and authorize the
appropriate city officials to take the necessary steps to fill the vacated position.
G
R. Michael Leek
Community Development Director
Cc0131 /ResigBethTUmp
► ECE1 UE
January 15, 2001
R Michael Leek
Community Development Director
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee, MN 55379
Michael-
Please accept this letter as my formal resignation effective January 29, 2001. I've
enjoyed working for the City of Shakopee and I'm grateful for all the wonderful
opportunities I've had with the City. However, I have decided that staying at home with
my family is most important at this time.
Sincerely-
Beth Thorp
cc: Mark McNeill, City Administrator
1 W O T WL
Mem
T: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Discussion of Residential Development Proposals, Implementation of
Planned Residential Districts, Setbacks
MEEETING DATE: January 31, 2001
ik I1 I'
Council will be asked to discuss the above -noted items, and provide City staff, as well as project
proponents with direction regarding them in line with the Council's current thoughts.
Accompanying this memo are reduced copies of the plans submitted for review by Centex,
Ryland Homes, and Town and Country Homes. Town and Country's proposal is undergoing
EAW and CUP review, while Centex and Ryland have had PUD concept reviews before the
Planning Commission. Representatives of these developers will be present, and have asked to
make a brief presentation(s) before the Council's discussion. Members of the Planning
Commission are also expected to be in attendance for the discussion.
1 1 1>
Provide direction regarding the Council's wishes as they relate to the implementation of the PRD
zone, and acceptability of setback variations as presented in the attached proposals.
R. Michael Leek
Community Development Director
gAcc\2000\cc0 13 14orkshop.doc
01/16/01 TUE 16:44 FAX
H CENTEX
11 innesota Division
January 16, 2001
Mayor and City Council
129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee,MN 65379
Dear Mayor and City Council,
Z002
1240o whltewater Orlvo
Suite 120
Minnetonka. MN 553
Phone: 952 -936 -7833
Pax; 932 -938 -7839
Over the past three months, Centex Homes has been working with city staff and the
planning commission on a concept plan for a 20 acre parcel currently zoned Planned
Residential District (PRD). We were originally informed that a PUD would be necessary
to develop streets less than 32' in width and to have some relief to the front yard
setback standard. Recently, I received a letter from Michael Leek stating the council's
desire to maintain a minimum street width of 32' or 36' when more than 200 daily trips
occur. Therefore, the remaining question is if the council will be receptive to consider
flexibility to the setback standards.
Before we go any further with our plan, Centex Homes would appreciate the opportunity
to discuss with the City Council the setback issue as well as your vision of the Planned
Residential District. If the City Council is not interested in discussing the possibility of
some design flexibility at a future workshop, please inform staff tonight. I hope the
council is open to discussing the matter and look forward to the scheduled workshop
meeting.
Sincerely,
- , 4 �;�Z
Steve Rch
Land Development Manager
Centex Homes
P
p � O
g� g� o .s
p g�
I t l l 1 4 0 a
s s vv9. 6Z 17 •vId S
t• zf.�Id•••••t• j..•ACl'i ,r �
I : J; i5
Ii11Nt 9�' 1 ;
°
I 'r —'� -. V ••.qL. -. (S �NIg 'A tal lv
� ttt \•• 1 .A•
..!.... - �^ ` I :..li t71: `•.:j .`•(j'61 r•VS' h ...�d t; •• � 11 M ACp'L V`
i t
- '). ..... --:1.3 ..:...:• L .'n it In BCP'L
1 C ®VA�
• L8
' q1 55
1 -
� � A
- 81 C.I
55 55 SS
tt
ua - BYAEET —
-� —
S5 D3 S 3O A' U
ooh L.t q
to n,
:R lob. LLf'C r t.
53 I. R1 rd
I I too a5 53 ee +e O
[� 139
I I ' [ = Z n 11'66 9C R'L •~^ �
P
cccz :;
e• [t®'[ X: on
c.1 on
1 1 �7 N N
. • t I 11 b. 9C9 r
L1.1
\\ \ \ \\ h �� •� 4 '11 b. LSC•11
P_
�
01
of t
07
mN J J
WNO:r
0
�� r:
1 t1�
s0
-
^ R
4o 0
I-
I
� ttt \•• 1 .A•
..!.... - �^ ` I :..li t71: `•.:j .`•(j'61 r•VS' h ...�d t; •• � 11 M ACp'L V`
i t
- '). ..... --:1.3 ..:...:• L .'n it In BCP'L
1 C ®VA�
• L8
' q1 55
1 -
� � A
- 81 C.I
55 55 SS
tt
ua - BYAEET —
-� —
S5 D3 S 3O A' U
ooh L.t q
to n,
:R lob. LLf'C r t.
53 I. R1 rd
I I too a5 53 ee +e O
[� 139
I I ' [ = Z n 11'66 9C R'L •~^ �
P
cccz :;
e• [t®'[ X: on
c.1 on
1 1 �7 N N
. • t I 11 b. 9C9 r
L1.1
\\ \ \ \\ h �� •� 4 '11 b. LSC•11
P_
�
01
u
I
I c,
I h
I q
4
I cj
c1.
a
a
a
� s �
C n
tv �.
rn
v
J I[r[
I�
I ^~
" I
ll I 3JZ.II000N I \I
of t
07
mN J J
WNO:r
u
I
I c,
I h
I q
4
I cj
c1.
a
a
a
� s �
C n
tv �.
rn
v
J I[r[
I�
I ^~
" I
ll I 3JZ.II000N I \I
Z/
° d
07
mN J J
WNO:r
0
�� r:
1 t1�
s0
-
^ R
Z/
° d
07
mN J J
WNO:r
iJJ rM1. LL'
/
oI)
/ r
I
0 I i^
I I I I
l oc . os �
Oil L J
. _ . _ . I O)
L- -4 ' --- - -� - - -J
IP
1
1 •
OS
0 0
J LL
U CT z
me
9 g
{ o n m n
rl a {Z # n
Ito g o m m N
R V
9 �
o w
T h 0 S g
,01 ° y $ $ $
K O n N tD YI c;
6
it
ti
t
® O T
p r� �(
CL
Ea...l ^ �.2. • � i '':,1_ ,( cc 1 •! rt � -�--� !
:I• �� .1.. . *q' I �j 1 {-; -`�, � r , -Gr' � ,•S i »�"3m'�.�...� �:.��.. yi� \ \ " j�� i -.
r
� ig .r•f:OL1•.-.1..j
•t •-' ,.j I)�1!1 ^ + a .nn�nnTi N :_•
FS
el. ..4i' -�..,� I ,Jl ;_..f- n t1.�- :...:' .;...;nt.i )
lr + .'7 ) l f l rrTdLt 1 — , _ al7 c_ i11141a1d ��.. __...- .•:.:. `.
J .
0v90N _. 1 b, r•
_ _00'OS � b_
- — =' ,= =." ' i�lrl lv l� _ _ , ° L. 00_QiL.. _.......
Do
e
at
� 'illy
I
Rim E
0
?3 W
d
v N
3nWvi£IF tJ3
` §GI I I I III I I 1 ;
'tL- MN-OVOY MADOO.—
x
0
N
,1�
7
r i
W
Z
J
d
O
Of
Q.
f- N
Z
w
Dow
w
Z
w
O w
V)
Q
w
LL)
Z
J
O
ry
r
u
c
N
N
V
.
W
p O
, 7F
O
O ,
CL
.0
0
O
3
N
d
4 �
V
l�
N
O
S
O_
�w
w a-
:2 <
O >
S
Y
U
Q
m^
�-Z
w
(n � N
z
Z
O
LL-
O
Y
U
Q
w Z
U)� N
H�
Z
O
Of
l�.
S
F
U)
w
w ry
O
Q Q 6
0
4
I_p f
0
N
O)I
1
N
ri
u
0 m"
m
O_
10
O
8
ry
x
U
o s
LL
0
O
u
�
S
Y
CV
U
U')
Q
m
O O
m
ry
U
LL.
O
Y
U
¢
m
Z
w
O w
V)
Q
w
LL)
Z
J
O
ry
r
u
c
N
N
V
.
W
p O
, 7F
O
O ,
CL
.0
0
O
3
N
d
4 �
V
l�
N
O
S
O_
�w
w a-
:2 <
O >
S
Y
U
Q
m^
�-Z
w
(n � N
z
Z
O
LL-
O
Y
U
Q
w Z
U)� N
H�
Z
O
Of
l�.
S
F
U)
w
w ry
O
Q Q 6
0
4
I_p f
0
N
O)I
1
N
ri
u
0 m"
O_
10
O
8
x
o s
0
Ci
u
�
S
4:
:t
•
1,
I�
W
I
d
z C5
♦
------------------ --------- ------------ 0 z
------------------- ---------------- - --
I - - - --------------------- 09
LLJ
V)
as
---------------
x LLI
-j z z
X
V)
ANI - -
-- ------
CL
---------- ---- ----------
----------------- :-.--
-Y - -----
0 -------
----------
0 ---------------
-------------------- ------
z ----------- - - ------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
--------------- - - -
------ Ld
:.�- P2 N
Y.
ttz -----
-k
.2 LLI
"k Lj
- - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - -
----------------- 6
-- ,
- -------- - --
----------------------- it
x 1 N
L % .% 1 ; - - - -' � \ \ \\ C= ` ' �' � �� /, x
% It
-7
C)
x
LLI
-----------
x
01 1
-----------
N
------------
-------- ---
, R
x
---------- - -
H "s 611
D "
ti
� ms \ \\ 2
- -----------
%
-------------------
------------------------
0*6*L
0 �
N1
0
0� m
CL t
--------- - - - - -- ----
4i
Z-ol x
V)
z
W --- --------------
ra
<
z
O 14 \ \ \ \ 6SL \\ �
V)
A
L
(.5
0
Ui
' I S9L V
N
919t
ob
Ld
X Lu
-4 - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -
--nQL z
x (D
z
- - - - 5,
- - - - -
- )r7 - - - - � LLJ 7
-i byU X V194
tS U N
N ------------ -----------
-J
C3
8
X I X
rr
� � M
Vi
x
--------- - - - - -- ----
4i
Z-ol x
V)
z
W --- --------------
ra
<
z
O 14 \ \ \ \ 6SL \\ �
V)
A
L
(.5
0
Ui
' I S9L V
N
919t
ob
Ld
X Lu
-4 - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -
--nQL z
x (D
z
- - - - 5,
- - - - -
- )r7 - - - - � LLJ 7
-i byU X V194
tS U N
N ------------ -----------
-J
C3
8
X I X
rr
UW1 • 0 •'
Mem
TO: Mayor & City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Discussion on Prior Lake Outlet Channel Feasibility
Study Analysis
ATE: January 9, 2001
Attached to this memorandum is a Prior Lake Outlet Channel feasibility analysis
prepared for the City of Shakopee and the Prior Lake- Spring Lake Watershed District by
Montgomery Watson and WSB & Associates, Inc. as authorized on August 3, 1999.
BACKGROUND:
On August 3, 1999, a feasibility report for the upgrade and improvement of the Prior
Lake Outlet Channel between the City of Shakopee and the Prior Lake -Spring Lake
Watershed District was authorized and reimbursement agreement entered into between
the City of Shakopee and the Prior Lake - Spring Lake Watershed District for the
feasibility report preparation. Currently, the City of Shakopee has a Joint Powers
Agreement with the Watershed District for the outlet flow for Prior Lake drainage into
and through the City of Shakopee. In the future a revised Joint Powers Agreement will
be needed to address further costs to upgrade the improvements of this channel as
development occurs both in the City of Shakopee and the watershed district.
A feasibility report was prepared to address the design alternatives and cost estimates
with those alternatives for upgrading the channel to meet the ultimate in future design
flows of this channel, from the outlet of Prior Lake to Blue Lake in the Minnesota River
Valley. Also included are some costs split options between the various entities that
benefit from an improved channel.
The main purpose for this discussion item at a Council work session is to introduce the
main findings of this feasibility study and have Council discuss various cost split options
that are included in the feasibility analysis. The Prior Lake -Spring Lake Watershed
District will also be reviewing this feasibility report and will be providing comments on
the report. Staff recommends discussion on the design alternatives by the City Council
for information purposes and Pete Willenbring, of WSB & Associates, will make a
presentation on this. Staff will be asking Council for some direction in the design
alternatives as well as cost split options with the Prior Lake - Spring Lake Watershed
District.
Also, staff will be able to provide a brief update on the Blue Lake Outlet Channel
Feasibility Report at this meeting.
To review the feasibility analysis of the Prior Lake Outlet Channel report and discuss the
design alternatives for future upgrade of this channel and associated costs, as well as
discuss cost split options between the City of Shakopee and the Prior Lake - Spring Lake
Watershed District and the City of Prior Lake.
Bruce Loney I � r
.Public Works Director
BL/p-,p
CHANNEL
IZ
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Parkland Purchase
DATE: January 31, 2001
The Council is asked to authorize the purchase of 4.88 acres of parkland over and above
what was dedicated for park within the Pheasant Run VI Addition.
BACKGROUND:
In December, Natural Resources Director Mark McQuillan and I met with the developers
of Pheasant Run VI, to negotiate the purchase of park property east of Sun Path School.
The Pheasant Run VI Addition had been required to dedicate approximately 6 acres of
land for a park. 10 acres are already owned as a result of earlier area park dedication
activities, and an additional 10 acres of land is currently the subject of a condemnation
action with Gene Hauer. The intent has been to provide a 30 acre park parcel that would
be a soccer complex.
At the December meeting, Mr. Ames expressed a willingness to sell the property for
"what he had into it ". He did provide us with the costs for that. (See attached) Those
costs amount to approximately $277,000 (there is a interest carrying cost per day until
day of closing). The total is approximately $56,700 per acre.
So as to provide for this acquisition in a timely manner, and minimize the additional
interest expense, the Council is asked to authorize purchase.
The approximately $277,000 was anticipated in the 2001 Budget, with funding to come
from the Park Reserve Fund.
I recommend that the Council authorize purchase of the 4.88 acres, and direct that a
closing be established as soon as possible, with the appropriate City officials authorized
to execute a purchase agreement.
�
If the Council concurs, it should, by motion, authorize purchase of a 4.88 acre parcel of
land from the developers of Pheasant Run VI Addition, for park purposes.
Mark McNeill
City Administrator
UV-1U-
I City Area Map
I P.-j- 2
BETTENDORF ROHRER KNOCHE WALL, INC. PAGE 20
p c ,4 ) 4L
ti
ti
00
LL-
vi
I C)
ZZ
Z)
c
U WA
---------------
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
SUBJECT PLAT MAP
1
I
ILI
IjI
Qc
—
- - - - --
------------
--- - - - - --
=—----------
Lr uj
cc
vi
lu
00
LL-
vi
I C)
ZZ
Z)
c
U WA
---------------
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
SUBJECT PLAT MAP
pa:i s
January 12, 2001
Mr. Mark McNeill
City Administrator
City of Shakopee
128 Holmes Street South
Shakopee, MN 55379
Re: Pheasant Run VI Addition - Additional Parkland Purchase by City of Shakopee
Dear Mr. McNeill:
As per our meeting of December 11, 2000, with yourself and Mark McQuillen we are
submitting to you a request for payment for the 4.88 acres of additional parkland over and
above the required 10% dedication as required within the Pheasant Run 6 th Addition Plat.
As we indicated in our meeting we have compiled all costs associated with the two
parcels.
Raw Land Cost @ $50,000 per acre $244,000.00
Infrastructure Cost (see enclosed) $22,861.55
Interest Carrying Cost (Land) $2,237* per month * *$9,830.36
(Interest as of 01/12/01)
'Total X276.691.91
*This figure has been calculated from the date of closing on August 31, 2000.
* *Interest to be prorated to date of closing @ $2,237 per month or $73.53 per day.
After you have had a chance to review this please contact me and let us know how' you
would like to proceed. -70
Regards,
Shawn L. Dahl
Enclosure
cc: ' Raymond "Butch" Ames
Pheasant Run of Shakopee L.L.P.
2500 west County Road 42 • Suite I I • Burnsville, MN 55337 • (612) 894 -2440 • Fax (612) 890 -9281
. http://www.PheasantRunHomes-com
13
JAMEs R. HILL, INC
PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS
2500 WEST COUNTY ROAD 42, SUITE 120, BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 (952) 890 -6044 Fax 890 -6244
December 27, 2000
Mr. Shawn Dahl
Pheasant Run LLP
2500 West County Road 42, Suite 200
Burnsville, MN 55337
RE: Pheasant Run 6th Addition
Dear Shawn:
Pursuant to your request we have estimated the construction cost for the public improvements
adjacent to the park property within the above referenced project. We have estimated these costs
based upon a front foot basis. To obtain the front foot cost we used the total cost of each the sanitary
sewer, watermain, storm sewer and street construction divided by the total length of street in
Pheasant Run 6th. We then applied this cost to the park frontage on the public improvements. We
have included the street frontage for Williams Street even though it has not been constructed. We
anticipate the construction cost to be consistent with the construction cost of Cardinal Drive.
The construction costs are as follows:
Sanitary Sewer
$71,908.00
Watermain
$83,556.00
Storm Sewer
$84,811.75
Street Construction
$ 139.590.66
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION
$379,866.41
Total Front Footage 5160 Feet
COST PER FRONT FOOT $73.62/F_F.
The total park front footage is 270.03 feet. Therefore the park's infrastructure cost is 270.03 ft x
$73.62/ft or $19,879.61.
The total cost would be construction plus engineering and surveying. The engineering and surveying
is 15% of construction or $2,981.94 for the park property.
These items added together will equal the park's construction cost for Pheasant Run 6th. This cost is
$19,879.61 + $2,981.94 or $22,861.55.
This cost excludes interest, attorney fees, gas, telephone and electric costs.
If you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
JAMES HILL, INC.
oel G. Cooper, P.
President
- b / Pig C/ / - nct y45
2
a
(D
N
N
O
O
/ -1J;
C)0
i0
0
O
tD
:� -
.O
0
CD
,0
0
p
!O
O
N
- -
. co
CO
O O - -
p
- 'O 01010. O
0
O.O.
O'U) I
O
O O O C) O O
O 010 0 O
O
O
Ln
r
.O. Ul -T1LD ;U)iu).
O
N
O -
-
co
i
(vj
CD
j iOIO_-- i0
-�
- ----- --- --
1
•� 0I O ;
'O O O;O :O'
•,
O
�O.O I O' .010 'O
,OI O' BO O O
O
LA
!O ;O O.O, .0
I 1
O
CO iM M. L Q
I c'j
N
I--:,
I
O
CD C)!
1
'OiO. '0010 'O'
O
_
0;(D
10
CD
O' ,O' O'O �OlOiO O'
O
O
it) LO
I
Ot
O
O 'O '0 ;01 t0 : :.0 ;0 .O
'p'M
0
O
r'
M; -
N
.0: O• pip!p
ILO
r :
-
0
N
M'
gyp r LD
O
co
CI)
cli
O 0101
•O Ol Lr)I
OIOIO O O
10 'O.O
O
O
O O
O O
'O -
;O
O
O
O:
to Lo,0 !
OI to '.r. O'O
N
O O
O
IM CO! CO 1 0 0.
CO
O
- jcqt
N
N
r CO
U) O'
i r M
LO
'O
O O:OO O. O O;O - "- - --
00
'O 0 0: O O
O
O'�010' O; IOi O
-
O
IO
"O
010.010:0. 10 O "O'
O
O
OI OIOi I O iL , O
LD
C 0; O'O. O O O -
p
0
"
CD•O!CD; j i0' : ! O
t�
'O
O.Oi0�0 O'O
'N
0
O
CD
U) I
0 I O � M' M O
I I
1�
UJ
U) O'OJ O r f� N 1
r
N
i
U
O
(na
NU'U�C O. C' ; rnV)J) W m y C C'O'NKy N'to�r - OTT iC-
O) O), m m 0 LA: > m>
@ d
N
@ N@ O @ p N Q) @ c, N N p O N N N N N O@ >>
'
7
U-
C C. C- C C C C C C C_
'O 'a �'�.� � a,-O N @�. E,J •O J
4 '
. a' a a mo d''" .N., :�!�IQ' '2'�' _ -..� �',� �:�;� �''Q. N. N
@ C
@ @ Y. Y- J J N
.
Q) (D' °
co
N'
` L'Y
N' O 5, O @-
N' O' O' N N
Wi n =,.C, � 7i'�. 7, • � ILLILL ,
: M :3 L
(0' m m (D (9 @ m @' @,LL' m @ m CO m @ @ N
mmm:mm;mlmmlmlUUc9cn'cn -
- - ._. i - - -
C9, a c�a'
--
a. aQ 'aQC7 aaa C7aaU Q:Q;aaaaa.aa-,(l �
- - 0 - - --- - - -- -- - -
m
O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o
0
0
--- - - -
0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 - O O O O CD O 0 0 0 O O O' 0 O O
O
-
0
m
E.
o o CD olo 0 0 0 0 0 0
o'.". o. o.o o o'o 0 C o"
(D
0
.0
0 0 0 0 0 Cl C 0 0 0. .o'o 0 o:0O O'o 0 0 0 0.0 0 0
C C C 0 o o C C 0'0. :c C 0 C 0'0 0'0 C 0.0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
-
o in:0 C :) in M, C:) CD, C:) 0 o
0 • n CD i CO. CO CD ' O O O O O
ri
O
0
U)
0 0 0 0 �_ m o 0 00 0 0 0 o'ui 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
U) O of � O - N p O) O c7 c l . C) to : C � U]' N uo U) O U) - U) • I 0 O
O
0
U)
tlJ
r.to O- CI) CO U) r I
c')
(D
O
N N N :(D O r�� 'N 1� C
_ _ �- m
m
M
N
U
-
-
C >
O O
@ @
C O
0.
CJI CA
r N @ O Y L 0
E i
Q@
Q O °25 @ a) 0 rn @ (` T a
>O
O> co
C
O> O US O @
u) .N d O. L .0
CO :`
n >> >
� C O CO
Q. O T
E CD C p
U ..n c0
~ =.J@ @ ` ;�.�� ( 0 U >_ d� N _
y
- .O O m C A d �O (6
@
�i�
O O 0 @ LA 0 0 0 O J@ U
r
' C O@ •�
O
C Q) @. m@ U
-� a U) U
U E
@
Q
O' 2) C C y r h W C 3
J C J
@ "O C- O O
dam
O LL = C N
C C__ @- @ 7.0 C
'O O
�"
C O ` .' O (n Y 0 0 0 co @ 2 7 Z >. m O
m(n @ >- C C @ @ U) r O).DY - -O U i� CO
a Y N
@ N O U a' _ U _
C O O
O . U3 N` a
m
C Y O_ O V) @@ C O C - Q @ N
Y X N 70 'O _I J O a Y Y (n a' Y D@@ N L O a @ U@ C
Q, O C LL m.-0 a a) m2 C C O O
O
@ a W L O O L EY @@ Y U �'M a H @ C a
CZ CL) cu m
a.3 m m O a a a 0
O � W F-
Q@ d d O Q)m C� T� O n X� O O
m @ .
W W 'U '�
U)
Y mY y a a•>
2 -c 2= a
- 0 c W .c -f6
@ a @@ o m w a 3 c a`� a J m i cn Q
0 U
C m O m O ( @ U O) m` L
@ C C O i :- C C i
U
Q
a L a L a a. L >. T C 7 0 L N T O Ch
U O C` L 2 a @ L °) E V)
Im
Cn m
J S E u) a F '- N w
@ .0 L E E V U > E
N d@ O C O_ D_ N �n O. O C U -@ C O
—° c@
a)
o 7 o@> 2 E.2 @>> O L c o :
(O
r
c@ L a o Y o E E .m = c L a @= a� — E @
O O Y @ O 7 >> 0 0 @� 0 o a) E O L�@ 7 o 2
LL UU mU U) b- W J�mmUJU
J
JU)U) T- 22Saa UUZF- J�OQm >aY 0 Q
O
r r r r r r _
Z
_
@
Q
C-
d
H
M
M U M M U fnM M Cn Cn Cn C/7 Cn Cn C!J Cn Cn Cn (n (n Cn Cn Cn Cn (n fn Cn Cn M a
W
TZ
ZZZ ZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZ Za
a'a'���Q��Of x x � � X 2 Cr_ a' Cf � Tf x a' X a' a' x a' x X�
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q C Q Q W
22222222222222222�a
an. a a anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaammCLw
_ -)
2
a
(D
N
N
O
O
/ -1J;