HomeMy WebLinkAboutJuly 24, 2001 TENTATIVE AGENDA
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
LOCATION: 129 Holmes Street South
Mayor Jon Brekke presiding
1] Roll Call at 7 :00 p.m.
2] Pledge of Allegiance
3] Approval of Agenda
41 Mayor's Report
JULY 24, 2001
51 Approval of Consent Business — (All items noted by an * are anticipated to be routine. After a
discussion by the Mayor, there will be an opportunity for members of the City Council to remove
items from the consent agenda for individual discussion. Those items removed will be considered
in their normal sequence on the agenda. Those items remaining on the consent agenda will
otherwise not be individually discussed and will be enacted in one motion.)
6] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS — (Limited to five minutes
per person/subject. Longer presentations must be scheduled through the City Clerk. As this
meeting is cablecast, speakers- must approach the microphone at the podium for the benefit of
viewers and other attendees.)
*7] Approval of Minutes: June 5, 2001
*8] Approval of Bills in the Amount of $324,495.13 plus $72 for refunds, returns and
pass through for a total of $396,687.05
9] Public Hearings: None
10] Communications
11] Liaison Reports from Council Members
12] Recess for Economic Development Authority Meeting - None
131 Re- convene
14] Recommendations from Boards and Commissions:
*A] Amending the Resolution Establishing the Environmental Advisory Committee —
Res. No. 5561
*B] Text Amendment to City Code Regarding Multiple- Family Residential (R -3) Zone —
Ord. No. 603
*C] Rezoning from AG to R2 for property located north of 17�' Avenue extended, east of
CSAH 17 and west of CSAH 83 requested by Tollefson Development — Res. No. 5560
TENTATIVE AGENDA
July 24, 2001
Page —2-
14] Recommendations from Boards and Commissions continued:
D] Rezoning from AG to RIB for property located north of Valley View Road and east
of CR -17 — Ord. No. 604
151 General Business
A] Parks and Recreation
B] Community Development
* 1. Registered Land Survey — Render -Bank Limited Partnership — Res. No. 5559
*2_ Upgrade of Domain Server for the Community Center Building
*3_ Extension Agreement with WSB Inc. for EAW for Removal of Historic Structure
C] Public Works and Engineering
1. Extension Agreement for Proposed EAW on Blue Lake Watershed Outlet
D] Police and Fire
E] Personnel
* 1. Amending the 2001 Part-Time Pay Plan — Res. No. 5563
*2. Sergeants Contract - 2001 Cost of Living Adjustment
F] General Administration
* 1. Premises Permit (Pull -tabs) for Shakopee Hockey Association - Res. No. 5562
*2. 2001/2002 Property and Liability Insurance Renewals
3. Meeting Dates — Budget, CIP
*4_ Tobacco License — Twin Cities Avanti Stores, LLC (Food n Fuel)
16] Council Concerns
171 Other Business
181 Recess for executive session to discuss litigation
19] Re- convene
20] Adjourn to Thursday, July 26, 2001, at 5:00 p.m.
Mayor Brekke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with Council Members Link, Morke,
Sweeney, and Amundson present. Also present: Mark McNeill, City Administrator, Bruce Loney,
Public Works Director /City Engineer; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; R. Michael Leek, Community
Development Director; Tim Thomson, City Attorney; Gregg Voxland, Finance Director; Tracy
Coenen, Management Assistant; Dan Hughes, Police Chief, Mark Themig, Recreation and Facilities
Director; Mark Mc Quillan, Natural Resource Director.
The pledge of allegiance was recited.
The following items were added to the Agenda. 15.B.4 Suspension of Certain Work Hours for
Construction Activities and 15.F.10 Setting Meeting Dates for CIP and Budget Review.
The following item was removed from the Agenda. 15.C.1 Acceptance of Grant for Updating Mobile
Data Computers.
Amundson/Link moved to approve the Agenda as modified. Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Brekke reported on the continuing meetings with the local jurisdictions (Prior Lake,
Shakopee, Scott County and Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux) on the Land Trust issues. Mayor
Brekke was hoping to have something definite on the discussions to report for the next Council
meeting.
The following items were added to the Consent Agenda. 14. B. Proposed Amendment Regarding
Home Occupation in the Rural Residential Zone; 15.B.4 Suspension of Certain Work Hours for
Construction Activities and 15.C.3 Amending City Code relating to Open Burning.
Amundson/Sweeney moved to approve the Consent Agenda as modified_ Motion carried
unanimously.
Mayor Brekke asked if there were any citizens present in the audience who wished to address any
item not on the agenda.
Raymond DeGeorgeo, 7385 Berkshire Court, approached the podium to address the City Council on
trees a sub contractor was able to destroy. Mr. DeGeorgeo had graphics to support his point. Mr.
DeGeorgeo felt the City of Shakopee still needed a tree ordinance. Mr. DeGeorgeo asked for a
motion that evergreen trees be planted on the other side of the pond, near his home, larger than Code
stipulates. Mr. DeGeorgeo would like trees planted that are at least 4" in diameter and 15' high. The
developer has discussed this with Mr. DeGeorgeo. Mr. DeGeorgeo is trying to cover with these trees
what was taken out. Mayor Brekke asked that this item be put on an Agenda as a future meeting
issue.
Official Proceeding of the June 5, 2001
Shakopee City Council Page 2
Amundson/Sweeney moved to approve the meeting minutes for April 3, 17, and 23, 2001. (Motion
carried under the Consent Agenda).
Amundson/Sweeney moved to approve the bills in the amount of $310,106.91 plus $38,456.03 for
refunds, returns, and pass through for a total of $348,562.94. (Motion carried under the Consent
Agenda).
Mayor Brekke opened the public hearing on the proposed vacation of a portion of an easement within
Lot 4, Block 1, Canterbury Park 1' Addition.
Mayor Brekke stated that Ryan Construction has asked that this item be continued until the June 19,
2001 City Council meeting to allow time to consider additional information_
Morke /Amundson moved that the public hearing on the proposed easement vacation within Lot 4,
Block 1, Canterbury Park 1 Addition be continued until the City Council meeting on June 19, 2001.
Motion carried unanimously.
Cncl. Amundson introduced Carol Schultz, Executive Director of the Shakopee Convention &
Visitors Bureau (CVB), who gave the Shakopee Convention & Visitors Bureau Financial Report.
Cncl. Amundson gave a few introductory comments. Carol Schultz gave a brief background on the
tax collected by the City of Shakopee from the motels for the Shakopee Commerce and Visitors
Bureau. A report of the financial condition of the CVB was included in the Council members
packets. There are four areas of revenue resources. There is: 1) lodging tax, 2) matching dollars
application to the Department of Tourism; 3) partnership with Mystic Lake for their hotel property,
4) interest Income. There are four areas of expenditures. They are: 1) General Administrative, 2)
Payroll Expenses, 3) Building Expenses, and 4) Marketing Expenses_ CVB has an outside CPA that
creates monthly reports. The CVB funds are not co- mingled with the Chamber of Commerce funds.
The CVB does do marketing and their business is increasing. The Web site and the AAA Tour book
appear to be the best methods of advertising.
Cncl. Sweeney reported that the Shakopee Public Utilities Meeting for June 4, 2001 was held in City
Council Chambers and was televised for the first time that evening_ The Shakopee Public Utilities on
June 18 is going to sell through auction $12,000,000 worth of Revenue bonds for the upgrading of
electric and water facilities. The anticipated interest rate is 5.5% with the bonding extended out to
the year 2030. The I -Net was discussed. The direction given to Mr. Van Hout from the Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission was to go out for a proposal for consultants to review what is available
and what the cost structure would be for an I -Net for the School District, Shakopee Public Utilities
and the City of Shakopee_
Cncl. Amundson reported on Vision Shakopee and the Huber Park improvements. The Shakopee
Rotary Club has committed $50,000 towards the improvements in Huber Park.
Official Proceeding of the June 5, 2001
Shakopee City Council Page 3
Mr. Leek reported on the request for preliminary plat approval for Valley Green Corporate Center I'
Addition. Mr. Leek oriented the proposed preliminary plat drawing. The proposal creates nine lots
within 295 acres for business park and commercial development along CR 83. On the plat drawing
the approximate 747 (ordinary high -water elevation) contour for Dean Lake was denoted. The
proposed roadway system to serve the nine lots was shown_ The lots range in size from 15 acres to
90 acres in size. The PIanning Commission has recommended approval to the City Council of this
plat with conditions. Mr. Leek highlighted some of the conditions. Three significant issues were
discussed: 1) park dedication (to be in the form of cash in lieu of land and also approximately 15 acres
of land for park purposes); 2) Shore Impact Zone (presentation by Jeff Schoenbauer of the Parks
Master Plan for the Southbridge and Dean Lake Area), 3) the condition relating to the mitigation plan
in the AUAR relating to the traffic analysis. According to Mr. Leek, this is really the beginning of
working with builders and the developer on the building of the lots within the Shore Impact Zone.
Mr. Leek addressed the City's ecological consulting team duties and use. This terminology grew out
of the Park Master Plan.
Cncl. Sweeney felt the Environmental Review Board recently established by the City Council could
very easily look at this plat for ecological concerns_ It appeared to him that the City did not have to
hire an Ecological Consulting Team.
There were some comments on the street names. It was felt that a conscious decision needed to be
arrived at naming the new alignment of Eagle Creek Boulevard to 17` Avenue and Corporate Center
Drive in the preliminary plat for Valley Green Corporate Center l Addition. Mr. Leek addressed the
street naming. It was felt the entrance to Valley Green Corporate Center really was a through City
Street and should be named as such.
Mr. Schoenbauer gave a broader perspective on the ecological team concept and conservation in
general. Mr. Schoenbauer had a graphic of what he was trying to accomplish within the context of
the public realm with a weaving of trails in the Southbridge, Dean Lake, Valley Green Corporate
Center area. It was felt by Mr_ Schoenbauer the opacity of the ordinance as it pertained to the west
Dean Lake area and the 150' setback area could be met. Mr. Schoenbauer wanted to see this opacity
met in an ecologically viable way for the City. There are great opportunities to increase the public
realm and to connect the entire trail system around Dean Lake and through Southbridge and Valley
Green Corporate Center. The Parks Master Plan in the west Dean Lake, Southbridge, and Valley
Green Corporate Center area plays a huge role in that region-
The comments from Pat Lynch, of the DNR, and his comments on the preliminary plat of Valley
Green Corporate Center were discussed. Mr. Leek stated that the bulk of the comments from Mr.
Lynch's letter regarded the Shore Impact Zone around Dean Lake. Mr. Leek felt the preliminary plat
and the comments from Mr. Lynch were consistent. Mr. Schoenbauer addressed the degree of
screening he was hoping to accomplish from the building to the lake. Mr. Schoenbauer wanted to
accomplish this in an ecologically friendly way as well as meeting the requirements of the ordinance.
Jon Albinson, Valley Green Business Park, approached the podium to answer any questions. Mr.
Albinson also commented on the opacity_ Valley Green Business Park was going to do an opacity
study to determine which areas needed more opacity than others along the shoreline of Dean Lake
Official Proceeding of the June 5, 2001
Shakopee City Council Page 4
and what kind of trees should be used to meet this opacity requirement. Mr. Albinson wanted the
study to define the corridors that needed special treatment. Mr. Albinson stated the 150' strip along
the shoreline is meant to include the City's trail corridor. Mr. Albinson stated that the City would be
granted full easements by Valley Green Business Park any place within the 150' shoreline for trail
easements. Mr. Albinson stated that he was willing to work with City staff, and Brauer and
Associates to identify the trail corridor recognizing that some of the trail may fall within the 150'
shoreline impact zone, and some of the trail may fall outside of the 150' shoreline. Mr. Albinson
stated that he was satisfied with the resolution and conditions as presented.
Sweeney /Amundson offered Resolution No. 5539, A Resolution Of The City Of Shakopee,
Minnesota Approving The Preliminary Plat Of The Valley Green Corporate Center I" Addition, and
moved its adoption.
Sweeney/Morke moved to amend the language in condition IIa by striking the words "and the City's
ecological consulting team ". Mr. Sweeney wanted condition IIa to read, "The applicant, as well as
their successors or assigns in interest, shall work with the City to maintain the Shore Impact Zone. In
addition, the applicant, successors, or assigns, and the City shall identify locations for and sizes of an
additional `ecological buffer zone'_" Amended motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Brekke asked for comments from the audience.
Kathy Gerlach, 4855 Eagle Creek Boulevard, approached the podium. She stated she was really in
support of the plan Mr. Schoenbauer explained tonight. Ms. Gerlach had previously given comments
to the Council and Ms. Gerlach will give Ms. Cox the comments also. Ms. Gerlach would like to see
the City's relationship continue with Brauer and Associates. Ms. Gerlach did have concerns
regarding the water levels stated for Dean Lake. She recommended not draining the lake below the
normal water level. Mr. Loney discussed the water level.
Steve Carlson, STS Consultants, working with Valley Green Business Park on the design of Valley
Green Corporate Center, approached the podium to clarify that one of the areas near Dean Lake does
flood in the spring by its nature. There was no intention of the storm pond to lower Dean's Lake.
The storm pond is there to protect the lake.
Gary Sorenson, 4915 Eagle Creek Boulevard, approached the podium with some concerns regarding
the traffic issue. He was concerned about the frontage road along Eagle Creek Boulevard and Mr.
Sorenson did not want a repeat of the traffic problems that are occurring on Southbridge Parkway
and CR 18. Mr. Sorenson wanted the City to stay on top of these issues. Mr. Loney stated in talks
with Ryan Companies, the builder on the Valley Green Corporate Center site, Ryan companies has
stated that the build out of the site is approximately 5 to 7 years. The traffic will not be coning all at
once. There will be time to address the traffic issues. Mr. Loney stated when CR 21 is built, CR 21
will relieve some of the traffic on CR 83, too. There is the condition from the AUAR regarding the
level of traffic at the intersection of CR 16 and CR 83 in Resolution 5539 that has to be adhered to.
Mayor Brekke asked the audience for anymore public comments. There was no response.
Official Proceeding of the June 5, 2001
Shakopee City Council Page 5
Motion carried unanimously on Resolution No. 5539, as amended.
Mayor Brekke commended the residents, the developer, and City staff for all of the extra hours
extended on this issue to help come away with positive results for everyone_
Amundson/Sweeney moved to refer the proposed language for the Text Amendment Regarding
Home Occupations in the Rural Residential (RR) Zone to the Planning Commission for review at
their June 7` 2001 meeting. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda).
Amundson/Sweeney moved to authorize the publication of notice in the "EQB Monitor" and
distribution of the draft AUAR for review and comment for Opus and United Properties on Fourth
Avenue. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda).
Amundson/Sweeney offered Resolution No. 5536, A Resolution Of The City Of Shakopee,
Minnesota Approving The Preliminary Plat of Shakopee Crossings I' Addition, and moved its
adoption_ (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda).
Amundson/Sweeney offered Resolution No. 5541. A Resolution Setting The Public Hearing Date To
Consider The Vacation Of Easement Lot 4, Block 2, Within Minnesota Valley 2 nd Addition, and
moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda).
Amundson/Sweeney moved to direct staff to install a traffic sign on Vierling Drive east of the first
driveway into the Crossroad Center commercial development that states "right lane must turn right"
(Motion carried under the Consent Agenda).
Amundson/Sweeney moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute an amendment to
Easement No. 1999 -55 between the City of Shakopee, Evergreen Heights and Reliant Energy
Minnegasco. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda).
Cncl. Link questioned if the property acquisition of the NE Quadrant of Harrison Street and 5`
Avenue would be a holding pond for the proposed development east of the property acquisition. Mr.
Loney stated that this would not be a holding pond for that development. This would actually be a
storm water pond for West Side Storm Sewer with some treatment for the water it contains before
the water enters the Minnesota River.
Dave Grommesch, 8948 Neill Lake Road, Eden Prairie, MN, approached the podium and questioned
the placement of this storm water pond and the ponds that the River Bend Townhome project would
be constructing. Mr. Loney responded to the placement of the ponds_ Mr. Loney stated that it was
very difficult to combine the two areas of the ponds.
Amundson/Link moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into a purchase agreement
for Lot 8 and Lot 9, Hussman Addition at a purchase price of $15,000. Motion carried unanimously.
Amundson/Sweeney moved to approve the suspension of City Code Sec. 10.60 Noise Elimination
and Noise Prevention, Subd. 3, Hourly Restrictions on Certain Operations, D. for E. H_ Renner &
Official Proceeding of the June 5, 2001
Shakopee City Council Page 6
Sons for Wednesday, June 6, 2001 to Friday, June 8, 2001 to conduct a 24 hour pumping test which
is required as part of Well No. 10 construction; and for Allied Blacktop, Inc. to begin work early one
day (4:00 A.M.) to seal coat streets in the downtown area to avoid traffic in this area; and to direct
staff to publish notice of the suspension terms with the conditions as recommended by staff:
1. Approval is contingent upon minimizing noise exposure near residential areas, and
2. If residential complaints are received by the City, the suspension can be revoked at the
discretion of the City Engineer.
(Motion carried under the Consent Agenda)
Amundson/Sweeney moved to approve the purchase of the Extractor/Washer and Dryer from BDS
Laundry Systems for a quote of $7,195. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda).
Amundson/Sweeney offered Ordinance No 599 Fourth Series, An Ordinance Of The City Of
Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending City Code Section 10.29 Open Burning, and moved its adoption_
(Motion carried under the Consent Agenda).
Mark McQuillan, Natural Resource Director, reported on the new play equipment for Holmes Park.
The request tonight was for Holmes Park only. The equipment would be purchased from two
different companies, Earl F. Andersen, Inc. and Webber Recreational Design, Inc. This equipment is
designed for use in a neighborhood park. A resilient surface for accessibility is also part of this
package. Cncl. Sweeney thought the park was being made more usable and that this was a legitimate
use of the Park Reserve Funds. The only equipment that is being removed from the park is some
swing sets. Cncl. Sweeney thought perhaps the old swing sets could be reused in a park that did not
have swing sets. Cncl. Sweeney was willing to go along with the purchase of the new equipment as
long as the old equipment is reused in another neighborhood park. If the equipment is reusable, then
the equipment should be reused.
Sweeney/Link moved to authorize staff to purchase the new playground equipment for Holmes Park
from Earl F_ Andersen, Inc_ and Webber Recreation Design, Inc. at a cost not to exceed $36,732.47.
Motion carried unanimously.
Sweeney/Morke moved the funding to come from the Park Reserve Fund for the purchase of the new
playground equipment for Holmes Park. Motion carried unanimously.
Sweeney/Morke moved that an attempt should be made to reuse playground equipment that is
removed from a park if the equipment is deemed usable. Motion carried unanimously_
Amundson/Sweeney moved to authorize a one -year extension to the current agreement with Midwest
Coca -Cola for vending services at the Community Center and Aquatic Park. (Motion carried under
the Consent Agenda).
Amundson/Sweeney offered Resolution No. 5537, A Resolution Of The City Of Shakopee,
Minnesota, Approving an Application from the Shako Valley Amateur Hockey Association to
Conduct Annual Off -Site Gambling, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent
Agenda).
Official Proceeding of the June 5, 2001
Shakopee City Council Page 7
Amundson/Sweeney moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute a lease agreement
with the Shako Valley Amateur Hockey Association to sell pull -tabs in the municipal parking lot at
2` and Lewis during Derby Days, August 3 and 4, 2001, for $0. (Motion carried under the Consent
Agenda).
Amundson/Sweeney offered Resolution No 5540, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
Approving Premises Permits for the Shakopee Rotary Club, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried
under the Consent Agenda).
Amundson/Sweeney moved to approve an amendment to the on -sale Sunday and on -sale intoxicating
liquor licenses of T.L. Foods LLC to allow outdoor drinking with the condition that access be from
the interior of the restaurant with screening as required by the Chief of Police and pursuant to the
conditions outlined in Conditional Use Permit No. PC99 -60. (Motion carried under the Consent
Agenda).
Amundson/Sweeney offered resolution No. 5542, A Resolution Establishing July 10 and July 24 h As
Regular City Council Meeting Dates, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent
Agenda).
Amundson/Sweeney moved to approve a workshop meeting with Jackson Township to discuss
annexation issues to be scheduled for Tuesday, July 31", at 5:00 p.m. (Motion carried under the
Consent Agenda).
Mark McNeill, City Administrator, reported on the Derby Days request for funding. The Derby Days
Committee approached the City requesting a contribution of $2,000 to support the rental of portable
toilets for the Derby Days celebration. Two years ago the City split this expense with Shakopee
Public Utilities. Because SPUC will be making other contributions towards Derby Days this expense
will be entirely the City of Shakopee's if the council chooses to make the contribution. No money has
been set aside in the budget for this contribution.
Morke/Link moved that the Council expend $2,000 for the rental of portable toilets during the Derby
Days activities, August 2 — 5, 2001.
Cncl. Sweeney stated that the City is making substantial contributions to Derby Days in other areas.
It was felt that Dick's Service could be asked to supply the portable toilets. There was discussion on
the toilet rental.
Motion carried unanimously.
Morke /Amundson moved that the funding to cover the expenses of renting the portable toilets was to
come from the Sanitary Sewer Fund. Motion carried unanimously.
A recess was taken at 9:05 p.m.
Official Proceeding of the
Shakopee City Council
The meeting re- convened at 9:15 p.m.
June 5, 2001
Page 3
Mark McNeill gave the staff report on the budget discussion for police hiring and building fund. This
will be a discussion item tonight. There was a discussion at the last meeting to hire some more police
officers and a preliminary discussion on some of the larger capital items. The action on the police
hiring was deferred until tonight because it was felt that there would be some firm action by the
legislature on levy limits by this meeting. What is apparent at this time, is that the levy limits are
likely to be for two years. An eligibility list does need to be established for police officers, the current
list has expired. If the Council does decide to increase the number of police officers that decision will
need to be made by the I" of September. The building construction plan is rather aggressive at this
time. Mr. Gregg Voxland, Finance Director, put together a couple of scenarios assuming that
revenues would be coming in at different rates. The first scenario was with revenue coming in at a
very slow rate. The Police Building and the Library Building could be done probably by the end of
the year 2003. In 2005 the Public Works Expansion would be started and it would be finished in
2006. In 2007 the City would be looking at building the new City Hall. Overall with this scenario the
City of Shakopee will be at a $3.2 million deficit in 2007. The second schedule shows a brighter
picture. Actually the construction of the Public Works expansion and the new City Hall buildings will
be done a year ahead of schedule according to this scenario. The CIP will be looked at in July and
some decisions will need to made then_ May need to look at other alternatives, if the current plan is
found to be too aggressive. Mayor Brekke suggested one of the alternatives would be to look at a
common site for the Police Station and City Hall on Gorman Street. Cncl. Morke suggested looking
at the option of putting the library on a referendum. There was discussion on police hiring that led to
Cncl. Sweeney explaining the impact of the tax capacity decrease, decided by the State Legislature,
on the City of Shakopee.
Sweeney /Amundson moved to direct staff to undertake testing for an eligilbility list for the hiring of
police officers. Motion carried unanimously.
There was some discussion on the Building Fund. Mayor Brekke would like to see an alternative that
shows the Police Station and the new City Hall combined on Gorman Street_
Cncl. Sweeney addressed the FY02 budget process appointment consideration. He felt the present
Council has had very little experience in budget reduction and that it would be helpful to have local
governmental retirees who have had experience in budget reduction, to sit in on the budget meetings
and advise the Council on responsible areas for reduction in services_
Morke /Amundson moved to direct staff and Cncl. Sweeney to contact Mr. Vern Lang, Mr. Dick
Mertz, and Mr. Joe Ries to serve in an advisory capacity to the City Council during the upcoming
budget deliberations. Motion carried unanimously.
Amundson/Sweeney moved to accept the matching grant funds from the Metropolitan Planning Grant
Program for a Natural Resources Inventory and to enter into an agreement with the Kestrel Design
Group to facilitate the Natural Resources Inventory at a cost not to exceed the project total of
$50,000. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda).
Official Proceeding of the
Shakopee City Council
June 5. 2001
Page 9
Amundson/Sweeney moved to approve the SPUC meetings to be broadcasted live and send such
recommendation to the Cable Access Corporation for funding. (Motion carried under the Consent
Agenda).
Mark McNeill stated that a time needed to be established to meet and review the CIP and do budget
reviews. Staff proposed some possible meeting dates.
Special meeting dates were set to discuss the CIP and budget reviews on July 26` August 16` , 22n
23` and September 11` at 5:00 p.m.
A recess was taken at 9:42 p.m. for the purpose of conducting the Economic Development Authority
meeting.
The meeting re- convened at 9:52 p.m.
Mr_ Leek addressed the question on MUSA within the City of Shakopee.
Sweeney/Link moved to adjourn to Tuesday, June 19, 2001_ Motion carried unanimously. The
meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
dith S. Cox
City Clerk
Carole Hedlund
Recording Secretary
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance director
RE: City Bill List
DATE: July 19, 2001
1 9
CONzz NT
Introduction and Background
Attached is a print out showing the division budget status for
2001 based on data entered as of 7/19/2001.
Attached is a regular council bill list for invoices processed
to date for council approval.
Also included in the checklist are various refunds, returns,
pass through, etc. totaling $72,191.92. The actual net expense
amount is $324,495.13.
Action Requested
Move to approve the bills in the amount of $396,687.05.
N
V r
M
ri
O '
W m
c0
� d
T
c
O
N
t4
O
H
c
n O
O T
o a
(D o
O m
m
O m
o 3
LL
(j Q
2 W
c
0
o.
U
O
U)
Q)
Z
J h
Z n 2
W m
U'
d Z U
J OJ Z W (D Z U
Z U J > W Z O
Q Zl
LL Z F � o> Q m �, Z W W LL
m
< Z W =O w O Z Q
w O J W U O p W ~ Q D W
< }Q U J Z w J
LL J O U LL lL ? W m (n LL O
O
c cD
j o
Q
m m
[1 M M
W
Cq CO
Cl) Cl)
t I
C tD CD
C V 'IT
(Cf
m
CO m
M M
O O
m c
� m c-
m
L lM tq
C � �
O N N
cc
C �
m Q
3
U
0 0
0 0
0 0
m m
M M
(0 m M (q
� m
c �
c 3
Q m
0
a
U
F-
Z
W
CL
ll
O
J
W
W
} O
F F- F'
Z
O
o U o
v v
0 0
O O
lq IM
j o
Q
O O
m m
11 C 7
w o
M ccl) C',
d' V
N
m
m
O
tq
M
m
tq
m
M
N
tO
N
M
Cl! O
n U�
m
m
N
U
0
0
O
O
m
0
C
7
Cl)
N
_
n
n
N
O m
O
O
O
M
n
—
cc c
tq
In
O
V
N
co
U
w
UM LO
w
V
w
m
U)
Q
n
7
tq
N
n
M
N
W
n
M N
M
O
V
W
O
C
O'
O
O
cO
N
N
O
n
m r
m
r
tq
N
d
M
7
C
IM
n
M
V
V
<P
C V
V
tq
M
'
x o
W
i
N
O
co
m
N
O
N
N O
to
m
to
w
N
N
l0
(q
V
I- n
In
m O
M
m
n
lq
O
N
V
O
co
N
O
n
M
O
M N
O
O
O
M
O
N
m
7
n
IM
m
O
N
to
<-
V
O
IM
V
lM t{
O
m
M
M
N
m
r•
Cq
M
C
ICS
(D
O
N
M
<'
m
N
n
m
M
�{
N
O
to n
N M
n
V'
W
N
V'
M
m
m
V
m
=
LO
m
c7
O
m
V
m
m
c0
O
co
N O
V'
m
N
<f
N
T
C
n
N
V
M
Uq
-:
IM
M
V
O V'
(q
O
N
V'
M
N
D-
IM
Q
n
IM
O
Iq
c0
N
n
CO
M
LO
N
UM
C
N
o
C
M co
Co 'T
n
N
m
N
m
O
Uq
m
n
w E
ci
w
n
In
m
N-
ro
r cc
o
O
n
r
M
W O
m
U
N
W
CO
M
M
O
co
V O
m
Oi
V
V
O
LL U
0 N
M
O
m
O
C 4
n
O
tD
Co
Co IM
O
O
n
O
N
N
N
r
M
N N
d'
N
Q C
2 O
U � O
LL
0
m n
F-
n
M
O
N
cO
co
co
N
N
n co
m
V_
n
M
U C
n
n
tM
O
tq
tq
n
O
th
n n
tq
M
N
(c
d
w
o
Q'
N
to
m
o
n
tq
V
O
to
m
m
co
n
w
M n
Cl)
m
O
C
co
m
n
t0
n
-5
co
x
FL
C
q
CIO
IM
M
n
C
'�t
cc
It
(O
M
M
R
m
M lcO
(D N
N
ID
N
O)
IQ
-1'
(q
`
IM
R
c
N
N
O
W
(O
7
N
M
O
V'
C .
d Q
U
0
0
0
0
0
0
C.
0
0
0 o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Cl
0
0
o
n
0
O
0
co
0
m
0
O
0
n
0
M
0
c0
0
c-
o 0
m n
o
n
O
M
o
O
o
n
O
C
M
tq
cc
Iq
C%)
I t
IQ
N
N N
O
a
co
O
N
O
c0
M
N
m
V
w
M
c
n
N
O
c6 �N
m
n
r
N
N
m
Iq
M
M
N
IM
<T
N
n
M
n
n
Cl) Cl)
U) CD
Cl)
m
n
•-
m
co
O
O
O
cc
7 m
C 'O
N
Oj
c �
Q m
T
c
O
N
t4
O
H
c
n O
O T
o a
(D o
O m
m
O m
o 3
LL
(j Q
2 W
c
0
o.
U
O
U)
Q)
Z
J h
Z n 2
W m
U'
d Z U
J OJ Z W (D Z U
Z U J > W Z O
Q Zl
LL Z F � o> Q m �, Z W W LL
m
< Z W =O w O Z Q
w O J W U O p W ~ Q D W
< }Q U J Z w J
LL J O U LL lL ? W m (n LL O
O
c cD
j o
Q
m m
[1 M M
W
Cq CO
Cl) Cl)
t I
C tD CD
C V 'IT
(Cf
m
CO m
M M
O O
m c
� m c-
m
L lM tq
C � �
O N N
cc
C �
m Q
3
U
0 0
0 0
0 0
m m
M M
(0 m M (q
� m
c �
c 3
Q m
0
a
U
F-
Z
W
CL
ll
O
J
W
W
} O
F F- F'
Z
O
o U o
v v
0 0
O O
lq IM
j o
Q
O O
m m
11 C 7
w o
M ccl) C',
d' V
N
m
U
O O
Z Z
LL O LL
Q, O LL O
Z
Q O Q
Of ¢ Of
w
Cl
n O n
O n O
m
O
tq
m
O
Lo
0
U
CI
to
N
to
m
L
C
O
�
CD
m
O
r
cq
Co
In
O
LO
C �
N`
Q
U
0
0
0
0
6 N
C 'O
c 3
Q Co
0
0
7
Cl)
CI _
0
C
7
Cl)
N
_
U
O O
Z Z
LL O LL
Q, O LL O
Z
Q O Q
Of ¢ Of
w
Cl
n O n
O n O
V)
o r
M
m
r LL
z
z z z
w
w w w
w w w
w
U
w w w
00 U
W
U
w
w O w w
U Q 00
W CD CD
()< ¢ ¢
O
a' K F
O O O
F
�
0
w Z oc K
0 0 0
w Q Q Q
O
LL LL LL w
w
2
LL
ai
LL 2 LL LL
Q
LL 2 2 2
� J ¢~ J
~~
U
z
U LL
H
ai W Z CO W
w ¢
o¢
U) V) v
Q a Q¢
F'
z
¢ r a w
w z
z
z
Q
¢¢ 0
F-
F- W F F-
W
F- w Z w W U
w
w F-
U
w Z
W w
w
C�
z
o (� w C7 O Z
U Z
0
C� z C� O O
W Z
w
U Z w Z 2 z w
W w W w O
w
w w m
w
D
w
x x O z° Q
Q°°
O U°
0 °°
0 w 0 0 a 0 w° a
O
0 �°
J
z
p
W
W Q
W
°
�p
Z
a O Q w o Z
Z Z
o
o z
Z
0 z Q Z Z Q Z a
Z
Z ( m
O
H¢
Q¢
Q
Q
..
O
O O 2 O O
0
0
0 0 J 0 0¢
Z
O O J z o ¢° O z LL¢
Q¢
Q
U
Q
z
z
z
L'
O
WF-
Q
J
w U
w
m F
Q U
J
� Q Q Q � M h Q ~ ¢ �i p
w W O
¢ r
'�
O
w
N W
W
W W O r W O
w
W U
w
w W W W
W
C� w
W W S W f/J O
Elf J w U Z X J -
D
U W
J
O
J
J
a W
J W
a
2
C
_
cL ZQ J
J d
U J
J Z
U� O U J U O U m
-J
O
W
J s >
O a r
¢
Q
z
O w
x f-
O w
O F
O
x
U
m
w m
�'
m
w
z F- ? to
z
o to
o z
w
?� w P
O w� In w
O w
a 0
3 w O w O w o 0°
o w U a X a F K a W U
a
a LL Q
7
N (n
a cn
(n
W
d 0) W
fn
a'
(A (f) LL � In
O z
Z
x m
U
°
O
to
z
LL
=3
C7
Z
W
W Z
U
U
U
o
U O tD
LL
W
g w=
J U U
rn
w
�
J
J m
w CO w z W o W '
U W J W J O CO
Z w
W
w
J
m
Q
O r-
W
w
z � a a s¢
r~
a
m
m
a
}
n o
U
O to O
C7 w 2
o
S2 z� to < m a Z
w
LL
t
a
w
LL
w
w
K
S
w m K
K Z W W
W O- o Z w
Z
Z)
D
Z
N
Q LL
a
W
LL y a LL
U .
z
W
a
LL °¢ LL
Z
W g=
Z
`" o "' W Q z
Z
2
z
m
w
w
M w
Z
p ~ _
Z=
m
o
m z W a m
° Q
z
m m z m¢
w
a W CL 0 o
a
Q a
a a w
v
O
U w
0
o¢ o o w
w
a
O m F
w w
p m LL
J a U W a w O o
a h
LL
w Q
m �
w a
w
0
gQ c � Q
w¢
w a J ¢ x
LL a
w
Q ¢ w o
� p 2
o
a g
w x C
r F-- m w o w U ci m
C
w
C
w 0 0
0
0
J O
ti
p l a0 p
0°�
U
p
W ¢
p
Z
w
U
2 U
o j
j
W LL F
p ¢ O 0
w
LL
°
>
O O Q
w
W ° U Z d m
w
w
h-
R
U r O
U
J z z J U w
to
a
O w
U
W= a Q
l w o
Z¢ Q W 0O S
W
O
z?
w w
K
F-
U
a s
¢ O
m U O W
a W _
U
U cr �>
U - w .>
Q Z fn
°
W
d w
W m
M
F 0_'. W p
to
O
w w J
U
`_" W¢
a
w z O O W W 0 a w IQ'- w
z
U
j U
j
O
j
O
J
X
Z z
O w h 0
z o
U O c
w w L
r
F Q
m w C7 C7 �p z z w 0 U
z
U
~
Q
Q
x
U
z�¢ F a
¢ z
W
OU a a a g
m m
z¢ a r R V U w m z
0 rn z
U
a z
p
a¢
O
w
>R9a¢
> >r¢nww¢oa�
0-
D
~z
w ° Z (!)U)z
�'°''�OY¢e
W-
M Z Z a
U
W w �'-
�?
O
O a
x x
Q
w
O
OW
O w Z Z O LL
Q
0
U 2 S 2 a
Z Z
>>
W m °° p J�
>¢¢ Q¢¢¢¢¢¢¢
m
m m m
m
m
m m
m O
D
U
> V
O
s y g z
Z m
m
W m m m m
'd
M O O O M
O to M O M M O O O O O)
O
O
CO to
O)
`
O
O N
O r
O
O
O
O
_
C
O
O
co O O W CO O
O O O N Lq O
N
ch N
to
N
O O O O co
O N N O f l N C O O 0 O O N
O O m O a0 �' O m
O
W � 01
r
� w W m
(A N M m
O
w
O
O
= M
o LO
O
O
M O O M M LL'i
to to r O n
r
r O
cvJ
cNO tD N O O O tD W
C O) t--
O r
O O) to c0 O R r� C7 M O N
t- N
N
r N
N
N
O
tD
Q
N (O r
7 N M V
O) N
r
r-
r M r
r
CV
04
O
J
w
W
K
U
Y n
CO (P O N M O O
r N M d' cA m
N M V to co t` a oc) 0 O N M C co (D r O O) O
O O O O O N N N N N N N
m rn rn m rn m
to
LO
(o m rn rn rn
U ap m O m D7 O w W O O O O w O O O O O O
m m w m
d m co m m m m m m ao m m m m eo rn m m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn m M
L O O) (A O) O) 0) O) O) O o1 O) Q) W QI O) O) O) O1 m O) to O) O) O) 01 O) O) m O) W O) W m (A Q7 O) O) to M (A O
to (o t0 O O O [o to to O to O O to c0 to co co O w O cD O O fD (o O
O to
co
O co t0 to c0 O
O CO
O
O O O
O N
V
M
M
W cc
n a cc
W m
W 5
a of
Y �
Q Y
= U
L
LL U
U
U
U
0
Cl O
O
N
N
0
O
J
(7
w
Y
U
f- F- F- F-
Z Z Z Z
W w W W
2 2 2 �E
W W w W
C7 C7 C7 C�
Q Q Q Q
Z Z Z Z
Z Z
F- W Z F- Z W z w F-- Z Z Z F- W W w w F- F- Z W W Z F W F-
Z U W Z ¢ Z U Z Z W w W Z Z Z� O Z Z w Z w Z W
W Z - W U w w LL w O w 0 w W W W Z W w w g W w 2
w W w W Z Z Z� Q Z Z W W U' z C 0 z W w Z z Q< W W 0 Z Z Z O W Y Z O Q w W (9 = Z Z Z Z Z U LL O W < LL Z Z LL Z Z Q Q J Q Z Z O O < Z Z Z Q LL O Q Z Q LL < U Z Z O
N Wa' U W o O W W a W o 2 o K U< W W W w << 2 W O W W O W JO U w
c Q U Y J w W a' U a' a a w Q J a W U w m U Q a W K w J w U J U -! 2'
w a w m U U Q a w Q U w O O Z w U U w w O a U U O w Q¢ U J Q O°
FY w Q Ir Q m F- W O O m D M- = co J O S W W W O w W W= F- (n W O a Y U O Z? O p
m LL (? U a LL U w m w' w a w 2 LL U w w a f0 O U ti wx a' a 2 E E U U W w a ti U W a D U a N
O
m
O
r;
(7
Z
Z
00 (n Z w J Z U J m CO U m m (D m w U J 1
U W W U m W W m W W W W w W w U w m I
o v d Z F� Z a} a m a a a W a J a Ja w a Y W i
Co Z Z a Q U m Q S d D w>- D Z D Z� F' 5 7 5 U W D M F I
' Q
� Q (O W U W U w Q U Q U 7,;W5 U U U W N W W> i
j O F- C7 C7 U' j
Of U U` P w U Q a w w F Q w I Z F F U F- Z U F- Q U H F- F- j¢ r a Q 1
c w Z Z Q 2 j= R 2 2 Q= m Q S to Z Q Z Q S Q Q Q Q;= Q= S
LL 0 0 D D a U W a a K U 7 a U Q Z a F- I- K U w U P
O Z J J w D t- >= w LL w a a w d w 0- w D m w w w of w 0
10 Q U m m O W� (j� W W 0 O U a O 2 O O CL m O a m O>- a O O O F-� O 0
Cl) Z
? O U z Z U U
a U CO a U a F z W z Z zz
F _ _
} O U O W J Z O z Z Z Of m F - J Q w F-
F U W 2 d n Y Z Z Z LL z a w a . F _ WW 0
}} (O m U O Z, O w ca a a_'_ (i U .,m.:� m m W- (n 0 Z W 2 V? LL Q~ J w R 2 Z w J W> W o m co W 0 a V M Z Z_ z J..
O Q p U ( a O 0 z V O Z m a 2< Z a w a w Z o
a a w wo
to Z U U¢ _. a' Z W . a' 1 Z)= fn U J o o w W W Z W J Q ? U to
Q Q O z W J 2 G O} N Y w W a' U a' w W W J m z a' Q Q
== S? g 0 0 0 0 a . U � � Q J J Q w J - 0 a W W Q W W U U U U U U U U U U 0 0 0 0 W W W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 0 0 0 (!) = S
O
Z
CO z
z F-
c m Q Z Z w
a 2 = S -I z
0 Z¢ U m m a 0
J W U= a
W Q
F- Z
LL W Q, Z Z F- W
Q a U LL P: F- Z
F- 5 z z z w o
O
2 w U w m m O w
O O O , O W O O M Co O O <f w O m � O w Cl) c0 c0 O V rn V P W r rn O O C CD O O C' W O la7
C O R O O O N V 01 O O tM M rn M O M � M 4? O rn (D m M m r O �? N O O O rn M O N
=O O n O co Lo m O o) ? �_ tM In N N to tM O co tM co O m u) R M m t7 'V' O O r.- C> tM O O 1` O M
E N M N C) � V M N rl V N n t• 00 tM CO N — M C' rn r o) (O M o) O R 1- V 1- O M C' 0) N O
M N c0 rn tM to to N W M N M c0 N N r to V O N m O O O N V W N
Q — M N c- N V' — <- — e- N V
Y n M rn O N M V tM (o t-- M m O N M R M w f— N m O N M V tM O r.- w m O N M R to co 1`
U N N N M M M M M M M M M M V V et C' Q V V V V tM tM O tM tM m m tM tM to O (O M m co O co co
� rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m m rn m rn m rn rn rn m m m rn m rn m rn rn rn rn rn m m m m m m rn rn rn rn m
= m m m m m m m m rn w rn m rn rn rn m m m m m m m m rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn m rn rn to m m m rn rn rn
U c0 t0 co 0 c0 O t0 t0 co t0 [D t0 O O t0 to to O O M O w o O to O O tD to O O to f0 t0 to to w w w w O
U
Z
C)
z
Z 2
z
O N
m
U U
Z)
F'
= z
O a
w
D F
a U
U U
U
O CO
Z
P
=
m
O
U m
m
LL O>
t
W
S
O W>
F F-
z z
a
Z ai
w w
O Q
O D
= =
S _
Y z
z Z
O O O , O W O O M Co O O <f w O m � O w Cl) c0 c0 O V rn V P W r rn O O C CD O O C' W O la7
C O R O O O N V 01 O O tM M rn M O M � M 4? O rn (D m M m r O �? N O O O rn M O N
=O O n O co Lo m O o) ? �_ tM In N N to tM O co tM co O m u) R M m t7 'V' O O r.- C> tM O O 1` O M
E N M N C) � V M N rl V N n t• 00 tM CO N — M C' rn r o) (O M o) O R 1- V 1- O M C' 0) N O
M N c0 rn tM to to N W M N M c0 N N r to V O N m O O O N V W N
Q — M N c- N V' — <- — e- N V
Y n M rn O N M V tM (o t-- M m O N M R M w f— N m O N M V tM O r.- w m O N M R to co 1`
U N N N M M M M M M M M M M V V et C' Q V V V V tM tM O tM tM m m tM tM to O (O M m co O co co
� rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m m rn m rn m rn rn rn m m m rn m rn m rn rn rn rn rn m m m m m m rn rn rn rn m
= m m m m m m m m rn w rn m rn rn rn m m m m m m m m rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn m rn rn to m m m rn rn rn
U c0 t0 co 0 c0 O t0 t0 co t0 [D t0 O O t0 to to O O M O w o O to O O tD to O O to f0 t0 to to w w w w O
o c�
m
IL
IL
w
Cw7 U Z (D
Z Q
Z Z Z r
z W g g w O z
F - o W
Z r z Z (n r U) Q Q Q z w F- W 04 N W r Z r
F- g W O D U W z I"' W N w w Z z K z w Q w O p W LL W
Z w 2 w Q Q Of w q z l- O Z LLJ W Q 2 Z r 0 Z (n W
u. M O W O RRI- Q O U O W ttrrQ (� W z o U` W Z o o (7 Z U U> Z ¢ W Q r¢ Cl) Z
-- Q Q Q Z Q Z Z w Z F W Q FW- Q O a O p O Q Z 0 LL w E U J ¢ z¢ O J Z Z¢ w¢
LL z O z z ¢ Z z Z
z o¢ g O Z Q LL Q W C� 1= Q r s Q 5 3 J w 3 ¢ U Y U w
w w Q F 0 w 0 0 0 U W >' U Z W w r 2 U d d" � x J 0..
x Z z U z y a� U U Y o U U w U 3 D p w¢ z 0 > z aai o o w > w 0 a O
m ° - m U a u d a? z U o a a w p a U m a LL w a a w w Z W w U v? a a c� W a w a
W N
p m r' O C�
y W r z z_
_ I Z Z
(q L Q
LL U W of
0 Z CO w 5 w� U)
o U z m U U w J W m 0 Q O
U U n w r r r} w w a w f!J 2 d Q U w Q r (U 7 CL
a fn w 2 a m co (i > d Z z w w w r) d w Q D U D W W W Z r
U Z m w r r r C7 � j U' r D o z z w W O < W Z W J w g p U z co
W Z
CD ai w w w a m m F Q w m z¢ = w w= z z i w> s 0 a¢ Lij
o w 0 w w w j O w w a 6 d U j> 2 F- LL LL a U i w z O p z O w p w n w w o w 0 CL
V x (n > x x a s s >>> 0 m O w LL n W r a w r p
F- W o r r w r r O 0 O m tl O U m Q U (9 r¢ w 0
Q o¢ O O r a 0 0 w w w o r r 0 } a O a O O m U w U)
z
U z d O
r
W z W O Z U U
-� (/) J 0 Z � Q Z ? U U
W Z U a W w w p _j C7 z z R z
Z w O W °? m Q D Q .(� Z r q m~ 2 0 O U g p
> g } J F- 2' x U w V' U Z W :Z - O `� O w O F- r W > U z
w Z z 2 w ¢ U w a - Z Z? W (� z m z z W z => w v w} w Z O m
W w Z w a I ?~ W a _� _ w F- 0 0<= m -� O F g o w w r w o o Z� w Q w z in
O z W ¢ z p §¢ W z w Z U O I O O p a s z m z Z z m 0 0 o W m (n W 0 Cf) a z= w 2-j o z o w z = w LU z w w¢ o w Z z o w 3 a w a w o ° o a
Al 3 0} w
x 33g
j Y Y Y Y Y w Y Y -2 2 2 2 2 Z Z O O a a U. IL a a o 0
6
O O O O tfJ rn W O N C N N CD W r- M O O c tD m O O C � O O r Iq O q O � O � m M CD
ti
v o 0 0 o m m ui r
1� O u eA O m c0 O m M m _ W r w M m t N u7 O ( r O N N r N N N m m co t0 O
p O n M w N O m rn W N - (cl - 0 N N o r 1� m cc M � V � f) Cli E r- > O ¢ L w cli co
0
O
N
N
U
O
J
(7
W
U # u7 (D T-- O m O N a] K to c0 1� O rn O N M C to O ti O m O N c7 V 5 m O O
O m rn O N C7 t f� 1� r CO m m m O N W oD aD m m m m m m m m N m O] rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn O O O O O O O O O
LO LO r- m m n r r n
0) m rn m m m rn rn rn m m m m m m m m m m m w rn 11> m o 0 0 0 0
tr U m c c M m m m m c c m c m m CD m c m m W m cmo 0 0 0 o o^ a
o v
M
M
O �
O m
P- a
z
Z
F
W
W
2
w
Lli
z
z
W
¢
Q
Z
O
Z
2
Z
Z
J
p�
Z
z
2
J
F
F
z
Z
U
F
J
O
J
x
z
U
2
F
w
w
F
F
w
F
z
W
w
O
m
F
F
w
M
W
z
W
¢
0
�
W
CWT
0
z
W
z
w
w
w
z¢
z
z
z<
z
Q
°'
Q
Q
O
w
0
w
W U'
W U'
WU'
0
Z
z
O Z
w
H
0
W V e w
O
w
0
0
°-
w
w
Q
LO
co
Z
w
z<
r_
Z
Q
Q
Q_j
Z�
Z
Q
O
D
Z
Q Z
W
Z
Q
Q
Z
Z
g
Z°
z
Z
J
Q
Q
Q
(
LLL
U-
J
U
Q
m
0
w
W
Z
w
w
Q
Q
¢
Q
U
m
3 Z
F
} i
W
Q
Z
Q
Q
Z
F
F
w
N
Q
a
m
o
o
w
x
2
W
Y
Y
Y
W
U
W
x
O Z
W
O
Y
O
U
O Y
x
O
d
a
w
W
z
W
W
c
Y
Of
Y
Q
Q
Q
w
a
0
m
0
J
0
K
w
W
w
X
w
In
O
F-
x
W Z
U
a
o�
W
�
U
W a
w 0
W
0
a
0
-i
W
U W
u)
w
0
Y
w
o
U
Z
J
J
x
W
a
¢
W 4?
Q
z
W
O
w
W
W
x
W
O
J
J
J
- �
O
a'
O
(n
2
F
In
J 2
m
x
0
(n J
W
x
Q
2
W
F-
F-
w
U
d
m
a
2
U
W
a
U
�?
U
(�
U
w
(L
U
U
U
a
a}
W ¢.
m
w
W
U to
W
0
a
w U
U
m
0
a
U�
m
U
Q
co
O �
_
"
Z
O
LL U
)
Q
C
F'
¢
z
m
W
J W
W
J
m
J 0
(n
m
W
U)
U_
J
(n
U U n
W
W
W
J
m U
U
m
W
CO Z
W
W
J
W
m
w
o
z
O
d
Cl.
r F
m
F
}
C
w
IL
a
F
z
(L
d
a
a
'a
Q
r
F
U
a
x
F
Q
CL
m W
Q
a
a
x
Q
a m
a
x
W
a
x
W
x
0
a
x
m
Z
a
x
c
w
F
2
z
z
0
x
w
w
W
m
z
W m
w
m
Q
(n vi
W
m
w
cn
z
m
p
U
z
x
z
z
z
d
z
m =
z
z
z
o
w
w
w
w
w
z
J
c
z
z
z
z
W
O
J
U
O
m
W
Z
Z
Z
Z
w
W
�•
Q
QQ
C7
Z
W
W
W
Z
O
Z
Q
S
Q
Q
H
Q
x
Q-
S
Q Z
S
F-
Q
x
H
Q
w
t-
Q
¢
a
F
Q
c
p
a
S
Q
x
W
o
o
o
o
w
a
W
U
S
m
m
w
U
Q
a
U�
¢
a
U
Q
a=
w
U
F
w
o
o?
m
U
of
z
z
Z
W
0
o
U
w
o>
U
w
w
Z
W
w
a
w
n
W
cn
w
F-
U�
W
o
Z
(n
0
7
2
J
J
o
w
a
U
J
_ l
J
x
J
a
W
F
Q
a
w
W
O
W
a
x
F-
D
W
a
x
F-
w
W
a
p
U
w
a
m
2
Q
w
a
v
U
Q
Q
o
P
2
5
z
a
w
w
2
u.
F-
F
2
W
o
2'
2
ci
O
O
a
U a
0
0
2
o
w�
0
CO
2
J
w
0
¢
a
o
o
w
O
L)
O
m
m
w
o
5E
w
m
LL
LL
O
Z
co
m
U
w FF
1
U
Z
OU
~
z
U
U
tr
Z
CL
w
}
O
O
rn
Z
Z
F
U
Q
(=
w ?
(L
U
U
p
LL
Z
O
Z
CL
W
z
Q
w
w
F
z
E
w
a
W
O
Cl)
�
z
°�
F}
m
w
o
0
0
w
F O
cn m
z
s
w z
Z j
w
w
0
-
}}
o
Z
z
Z
J
Z
W
Cl
,Z
a'
a'
R'
; O
a r
W 2
�.
y
0
W
m
U
a
a'
U
m
IW
Q
cn
C7
C7
J
z
a¢
U¢
x
O
O
O
O
Q
a
g¢
ul
Q
w 2
U
J
m o
W
o
F
J
F-
W
w
W
W
W
w
3
F
�
Z
O
w
w
w =
F
W
S U
U
C7
cq
Z a
0
p
D
2 {
Z
K
}�
h
0
Z
0
w
O
x
Z
_
F
r
W
w
Cl)
�-
0
W
z
U'
2 '
W
O
o
O
O
p
W
O W
W
W
W
Q
O
x W
a
Z
0
W
w
J
W
p
O
F
F
J
o
W
Y
w<
0
0
0
U
0I-
0
U-
U
U d
O
a
O
a
a
W Z
O
Z
m
Q�
0
O
F
W
(�
a}
w
C7
=
w
w
o
z
Q
Q
Z}
F
2
LL
U/)
I
F
F-
F
F
F->
w YY
Y
Y
Z p
W
d
O
Q F
U
z
-j Q
J
W
F
L
J
x
J
tL
O
m
w
2
0
0
0
O
O
w>
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
>
z o
m¢
W
w
F
J
Y
U
U
W
w
d
W
w
w
w
Z
0
O
D
°�
O
U
U
U
U
U
U
W
W 2
x
S
S
x W
Z
Z
O 0
a
F-
F-
x
O
Q
p
Q
O
O
tq
r
N
O
(p
O
M
O
O
V
m
C
r
N
O>
O
O
O
O
O
((7
O
O
O
O
r
O
O
O O
O O
V'
cq
O
•
O
O
O m
O cq
O
O
O
N
oR
O O
O m
N
O
O
O
O
r
O
N
In
r
O
O
(O
O
N
M
N
C
U
Ld
L6
O
O
co
O
M
M
co
r
N
r
O
O]
W
M
O
O
O
(D r
r
to
to
V
M
O
O
W
r N
V)
r
O
T
M
,
O M
O C'
N
M
V)
O
�
M
O
M
V
N
O
M
O
r
(A
a'
N
O
(p
LO
co
O
Cl
O
cl)
O
N
—
V
O
O
r
O
N
Cl)
(n
M
N
Q
O
M
O
(3J
M
—
(n
of
( n
a-
(0
N
(p
R
co
N
V
O n
N
Cl)
N
1_
O
N
N
O
J
w
U
(y
#
Y
O
O
N
M
C'
LL�
O
r
OJ
01
O
N
Co
R
lf)
(D
r N
N
O
N
O
M
M
N CO
M M
7
M
t0
M
(D
M
r N
M M
W
M
O
N
M
V
4J
(U
r
N
V
O
V
to
a'
U
m
L
p
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
N
O
O
N
O
O
N
O
O
N
O
O
N
O
0
N
O
O
N
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
a
O O
O O
Co
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
Cl
O
O
O
O
O
Cl
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cl
O
U
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r r
r
r
r
r r
r
r
r
r r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
o
M
o m
m
EL
� EL
F-
z
z
z
w
w
w
2
2
2
w
w
w
U
U
Q
U
U
U
¢
U
U
¢
O
O
0
0
O
O
O
LL
LL
<
LL
u
LL
<
LL
Ll
<
W
¢
W
w
~¢
�
0
Q
(
�<°w����Ww��t¢
-���w
C7
c7
>
Z
U
U
z
U
Z
z
— C7
C7
Z
Z
Z
z
Q
a
w
U
Of
o¢H�
w w
U U¢
2
Q
Q¢
2
w
U
Z
O
O-,
O
Z Z
�
U-i
Z
O
O
w
U
0
0
0
0¢
U
U O
p
U
J-
U
U
O
S
S
K
Z
P
a'
a'
J
a'
F-
J a'
W
J
J
J
N
N
F-
F
z
Q
F.._
Q
W
J F-
F
J
J
J
¢
_
c
W
W
O
w
�
W
W
O
W
W CJ
O w
w
O
O
O
w
W
N p
w
w
�i
}
Of
O w
Q �i
Q
w
a
`o m
m �
cn
a
cn
0
a
m U �
m
co
co
O
U)
U
L
¢
a
(n
¢
a
Q
a
LL
U
z~
z
z
.�
O
Q
w
O
O
} O
Q
V
O
Q
Q
F-
O
X
z
O
0 o
U
U
00
U
U
r
W=
Z
W
W
a
j
z
w
m
d
o
w
O
O
N
ra
w
z
w
z
F
U>>
n
W
)-ow
w
w}
z
a
W
w
z
o
O
O
¢
a
o Q
a
W
z
C
w
W
X
X �
a
w
x
W
W
W
O
J
w
W
J
W
W
W
O
V
J
W
J
W
2
P
D
O
LL
LL
LL
u-
LL
w
O
(� W
Q Z
S
F- S
J
W
Q
W
LL
W
FL
W
J
w
¢ (F-
r-
Z
Y
O
2
o
2
J�
g a
r-
=
o
o
t-
CO
U
U
W
Z)
U
W
V
F-
Z
>
CK
w
U
w
Q
m
a
cd
tr
0
Q
a
d
O
m
U
U
W
U
F
z
�
af C9
U
to
w
Q
u
Z
J
W
O"
V
a Q
U
F - i
ai
w
J
= 1
J
O
O
W
Q
5
�
W
W
a'
w
w
m
O
F
Y
w
�'
O
z¢
U
w
D
F U
°~
U
Z
Q
z
U
�
od=
U
Z
:3
J
m
Q
W
�QQ
z
U
v�
S
O
U
X
U=
>
Q
Q
m
m
U
W
�?
Y�
� m
m�>>
j m
O
F-
C
m
O
C
N
C]
m
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
0
N
to
N
r
O
O
Co
O O
to O
O
R
to
C?
M
m
(O
r
r O
O
O
E
'7
C
W
r
cl)
to
N
V
O
r
N
c`)
r
m
N
N
(h m
m (p
o
N O
m m
co co
-'r
M
v
m
r
O
co
r
m
c0 r
co m
cc
CD
o
p
¢
co
v
110
m
m
co
N
N
O
J
CD
W
Y
U
#
U o
to
to
N
C)
m
C'
to
to
to
(o
to
r
to
co m
to to
O
to fD
N
co
co
V
co
to
(O
O
co
L
0
O
C)
r
O
r
o
r
O
O
n
O
O
r
O
O
r
O
O
r
O
O
r
O O
O O
r r
O O
O O
r r
O
O
r
O
o
r
O
O
r
O
O
r
o
0
O
r
co
Cl)
o m
IL
IL
L ,
w E
d E o
O = rn
2 v �
� m
LL t
O U
U
C _
U O O
U
r
C
0
O)
ch
O)
O
O
C)
M
m
O
O
O
N
V
0
O
O V
O r
O N
m
O
O
O
O
O
m
N
O�
V
O)
W
p
E
Q
N
O
OJ
(p
N
O
W
N
N
O
N
(O
N
O O
N SR
V
O
R
7
W
CO
N
O
O
M
N
8
w
N
co
(p
(p
I.
N
N
V
m
Cl)
W
y
m
O
H
°
U
0
LL
0
O
m
LL
LL
W z
Cn
O
Y
(n
Z
°
°
~
0o
w
W
O
W
Z
lL
Z
E
U
Z
W
ti_
m
D
O
O
w
m°
F
z-
w
c7
0
IL
cn
z
m�
w
a
LL Q
2 w
a
o
X�
w
0
Z
Y
M
W
9
0
� W
O
J
3
W
U)
Y c(D
H
W
Q
m
Q
U
O
m x
W
5
m
to
w
((j p_
O
O
O
O
N
O O
O
O
LO
O
D E
O
p0
c
°'
o
0
'7
o
m LO
w
m
r—
o
O
0
O
0
0
N
0
N
0
V
0
0
V
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
From: Mark McQuillan, Natural Resource Director
Subject: Resolution No. 5561 amending Resolution No. 5495 with Revisions to the
EAC Responsibilities
Date: July 17, 2001
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is being asked to adopt Resolution No. 5561 amending Resolution No.
5495, establishing an Environmental Advisory Committee for the City of Shakopee.
BACKGROUND
After careful review, the EAC recommends the following changes.
5. The Committee shall have the following Charges:
a. Review land use and development proposals.
b. Develop and recommend policies, ordinances and procedures for the
management of natural resources, wildlife habitat and conservation
development.
c. Provide direction for the creation of greenways and protection of cultural
and ecological assets within the community.
d. Provide guidance concerning community -wide environmental education
programs.
e. Pros —and Develop and recommend policies, ordinances and
procedures to enhance water conveyances, water quality, wetlands,
woodlands, grasslands, soils, wildlife habitat and healthy urban forest.
ALTERNATIVES
1) Adopt Resolution No. 5561
2) Table for further information from staff.
3) Do nothing.
RECOMMENDATION
Alternative #1.
Motion to approve Resolution No. 5561, A Resolution amending Resolution No. 5495,
establishing an Environmental Advisory Committee for the City of Shakopee and move
for its adoption.
Mark J. McQu' an
Natural Resource Director
Items shown in bold have been added.
Items shown with a stillkeugh have been stricken.
T
3 1
!, '
WHEREAS, on the first day of March, 2001, City Council adopted Resolution No. 5495,
establishing the Environmental Advisory Committee for the City of Shakopee, and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Advisory Committee recommends minor revisions to
the Resolution to clarify its duties and responsibilities, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 1 O THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA,
1. An Environmental Advisory Committee is hereby established, composed of five
(5) members, to be appointed by the City Council, and to include representatives
from the community.
2. Terms on the Committee shall be three (3) years in duration to be calculated from
March 1, 2001. Terms of the initial appointments shall be staggered so as to
provide orderly transition for future appointees.
3. The following persons are hereby appointed to the Environmental Advioory
Committee for terms of the office as follows:
a. Charlie Kubler for a one -year term expiring February 28, 2002.
b. Russell Kennedy and Jeff Rienhard for a two -year term expiring February
28, 2003.
c. Steve Menden and Mary Pennington -Hoyt for athree -year term expiring
February 28, 2004.
And, the foregoing shall hold their office until their successors are appointed and
qualified as provided by law.
Items shown in bold have been added.
Items shown with a stnlethfeugh have been stricken.
4. Members of the Committee shall serve without compensation and not directly or
personally benefit from any recommendations of the Committee. Members shall
annually select a Chairperson, Vice Chair and Secretary, at the first meeting in
March. A majority shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.
Where not otherwise stated, the business of the Committee shall be governed by
Roberts Rules of Order Newly Revised.
5. The Committee shall have the following Charges:
a. Review land use and development proposals.
b. Develop and recommend policies, ordinances and procedures for the
management of natural resources, wildlife habitat and conservation
development.
c. Provide direction for the creation of greenways and protection of cultural
and ecological assets within the community.
d. Provide guidance concerning community -wide environmental education
programs.
e Pr an d Develop and recommend policies, ordinances and
procedures to enhance water conveyances, water quality, wetlands,
woodlands, grasslands, soils, wildlife habitat and a healthy urban forest.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee.
Minnesota, held this day of , 2001.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Items shown in bold have been added.
Items shown with a s6-1ethfeuo have been stricken.
► a
CITY OF SHAKOPEE ,
Memorandum C 0 N S E 11
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Text amendment regarding the Multiple - Family Residential (R -3)
Zone
MEETING DATE: July 24, 2001
At its July 10' meeting the Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance consistent with
staffs March 22 memorandum for action at the next meeting. That draft ordinance is
attached for the Council's consideration.
1. Approve Ordinance No. 603 as presented.
2. Approve Ordinance No. 603 with revisions.
3. Do not approve Ordinance No. 603.
4. Table the matter for additional information.
1 1 1
Offer and pass a motion consistent Alternative No.1 consistent with the Council's
direction.
R. Michael Leek
Community Development Director
=1 DES] V WK112
1 I 1 / ' 1 1
■ 1 1 1 111 1
■I 1' 1 11 � ■
T HE 1 THE 1 1
FOLL AS
Section 1 - That City Code Chapter 11, Zoning, Section 11.32. MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R -2), is hereby amended by adding the language which
is underlined and deleting the language which is stnae k thfe
Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of the medium density residential zone is to provide an
area which will allow five and one -one hundredth two and one -half 5.01 to eight
(8) residential dwellings per acre and also provide a transitional zone between single family
residential and other land uses.
Subd. 2. Permitted Uses.
A. residential structures containing two (2) to her {4) or more dwelling units.
Subd. 5. Design Standards.
A. Density: a minimum of five and one -tenth (5.01) and a maximum ei ht 8 of
eleven (44) dwellings per acre. Streets shall be excluded in calculating acreage.
Section 2 - That City Code Chapter 11, Zoning, Section 11.34. MULTIPLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R -2), is hereby amended by adding the language which
is underlined and deleting the language which is stf:u k thfeug - :
Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of the multiple - family zone is to provide an area which
will allow ) eight and one -one hundredth (8.01) to °i&ee 41 twelve (12) multiple -
family dwelling units per acre, and also provide a transitional zone between single - family
residential areas, medium - density residential areas and other land uses.
Subd. 5. Design Stan dards.
D. Density: a minimum of seven (7) eight and one -one hundredth (8.01) and a
maximum of ei&een (!8 ) twelve (12) dwellings per acre. Streets shall be
excluded in calculating acreage.
1 Density bonuses in Planned Unit Developments UDs) — In the
event that a proposed PUD in the R - 3 Zone exceeds the
requirements for parking or open space, the City Council may Grant
a density bonus of up to two (2) dwelling units per acre to allow a
densi , of up to fourteen (14) dwelling units per acre.
E. Open Space: A multiple - family dwelling_ project shall provide at least 15% of
the project area as open space, as that termed is defined in Sec. 11.50, Planned
Unit Development District Subd. 5 Design Standards, B.
Section 3 - That City Code Chapter 11, Zoning, Section 11.61, Parking, Subd. 4.
Required Number of Parking Spaces is hereby amended by adding the language that is
underlined and deleting the language that is stfuek thfe ig :
Amend Table 2 as follows;
1. Residential and Lodging
a. Single - family, two - family, 2 per dwelling
m ultiple family dwellings
b Multiple - family dwellings 2.25 per dwelling
Section 2 - - Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its
passage and publication.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota held the day of 1 2001.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Published in the Shakopee Valley News on the day of , 1999.
PREPARED BY:
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee, MN 55379
2
1 •. 1 � Memorandum
•1
Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
Julie Klima, Planner II
ONSET
Amendment to the Zoning Map — Rezone property from Agricultural
Preservation (AG) Zone to Medium Density Residential (R2) Zone
ME ETING DATE: July 24, 2001
CASELOG NO.: 01 -081
INTR ODUCTION:
Tollefson Development has requested that the City amend its zoning map to rezone property currently
zoned Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Medium Density Residential (R2) Zone. The
property is located north of 17"' Avenue extended, east of CSAH 17, and west of CSAH 83. The City
Council reviewed this request at its July 10, 2001, meeting and moved to deny the request and direct
staff to prepare a denial resolution.
Attached for the Council's consideration and action is a draft resolution of denial.
1. Approve Resolution No. 5560, A Resolution Denying a Request to Rezone Property from
Agricultural Preservation (AG) to Medium Density Residential (R2).
2. Do not approve Resolution No. 5560, A Resolution Denying a Request to Rezone Property
from Agricultural Preservation (AG) to Medium Density Residential (R2).
3. Table the decision and request additional information from the applicant and/or staff
1 1 1=
Offer and approve a motion to approve Resolution No. 5560, A Resolution Denying a Request to
Rezone Property from Agricultural Preservation (AG) to Medium Density Residential X).
r
ie Klima
anner II
g_\cc\2001 \cc0724\reztollefson- denial. doc
1 goo 11 r
• I Vol I
L e i YZ 0 1p
WHEREAS, Tollefson Development, applicant and property owner, has requested the
rezoning of land from Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Medium Density Residential (R2)
Zone; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as follows:
The North Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 17,
Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the
Planning Commission on June 21, 2001, at which time all persons present were given an
opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council heard the matter at its meeting of July 10, 2001, and found
that the proposed rezoning is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the area of the City
within which it is located and voted to deny the request to rezone.
NOW, TUEREFORE, BE rr RESOLVED BY THE CrrY COUNCIL OF THE CrrY OF
SHAKOPEE, SOTA, as follows: that the request to rezone property described above from
Agricultural Preservation (AG) to Medium Density Residential (R2) is hereby denied.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
held the day of , 2001.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
Mem
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Julie Klima, Planner II
S JECT: Amendment to the Zoning Map — Rezone property from Agricultural
Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban Residential (R -1B) Zone
MEETING DATE: July 24, 2001
INTRODUCTION:
Thompson Land Development has requested that the City amend its zoning map to rezone property
currently zoned Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban Residential (R -1B) Zone. The
property is located north of Valley View Road and east of CSAH 17. Both the adopted
Comprehensive Plan and draft Comprehensive Plan guide this area for Single Family Residential
purposes.
PIANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
At its July 5, 2001, meeting, the Planning Commission took public testimony and reviewed this request.
After review and discussion, a motion to recommend approval of the rezoning request was approved
unanimously. Provided for your reference is a copy of the July 5, 2001 memorandum to the Planning
Commission.
1. Approve the request to rezone property from Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban
Residential (R -1B) Zone.
2. Deny the request to rezone property from Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban
Residential (R -1B) Zone.
3. Table the decision and request additional information from the applicant and/or staff.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer and approve a motion to approve Ordinance No. 604, approving the request to rezone
property from Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban Residential (R -1B) Zone.
i
J lie Klima
Tanner II
g Acc\ 2001 \cc0724\rezthoinpsonr lb. doc
WHEREAS, Thompson Land Development, applicant, and Joan Schultz, property owner,
have requested the rezoning of land from Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban
Residential (R -113) Zone;
WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as follows:
That part of the south fifty acres of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 17,
Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota lying northerly of County Aid Highway 79
(Valley View Road), EXCEPT therefrom the following described tracts:
A strip one rod wide along the westerly boundary of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter
starting at the Northwest corner of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter and extending in a
southerly direction to a point where said one rod strip intersects the public highway, and
Beginning at the southwest corner of said Section 17 and running thence North on the Section
line 1395 feet to the center line of County Aid Road No. 79; thence South 73 degrees 23 minutes
East along the center line of said road or at an angle of 106 degrees 37 minutes to the right 714
feet to the southwest corner of the land herein described, thence North parallel to the Section
line 125 feet; thence East to an angle of 90 degrees 35 minutes to the right 686.7 feet to the
1/1 e line; thence South on the sixteenth line 433 feet to the center line of County Aid Road
Number 79; thence northwesterly along the center line of said road about 960 feet to place of
beginning.
WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the
Planning Commission on July 5, 2001, at which time all persons present were given an
opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council heard the matter at its meeting of July 24, 2001, and found
that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the area of the City
within which it is located.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1 - That the zoning map adopted in City Code Sec. 11.03 is hereby amended by
rezoning the property referenced herein, from Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban
Residential (R -1B) Zone_
Section 2 - Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage
and publication.
Passed in
Minnesota, held this day of
Attest:
Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
2001.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
Published in the Shakopee Valley News on the day of 7 2001.
M i
cyrInerf F
Mem
TO: Shakopee Planning Commission
FROM: Julie Klima, Planner II
SUBJECT: Amendment to the Zoning Map rezoning property from Agricultural Preserve
(AG) to Urban Residential (R -1B)
MEETING ATE: July 5, 2001
REVIEW PERIOD: May 21, 2001 - September 18, 2001
CASELOG NO.: 01 -086
Site Information:
Applicant: Thompson Land Development
Property Owner: Joan Schultz
Location: North of Valley View Road, south of Alden Avenue and east of CSAH 17
Adjacent Zoning: North: Urban Residential (R -113)
South: Rural Residential (RR)
East: Urban Residential (R -113)
West: Agricultural Preservation (AG)
MUSA: The site is within the current MUSA boundary.
INTRODUCTION:
Thompson Land Development has requested that the City amend its zoning map to rezone property
currently zoned Agricultural Preservation (AG) to Urban Residential (R -113). The property is located
north of Valley View Road, east of County Road 17, and south of Alden Avenue (please see Exhibit A).
The approved 1995 Comprehensive Plan and the draft Comprehensive Plan guide this property as single
family residential.
The City's Comprehensive Plan sets basic policies to guide the development of the City. The purpose of
designating different areas for residential, commercial, and industrial land uses is to promote the location
of compatible land uses, as well as to prevent incompatible land uses from being located in close proximity
to one another. The Zoning Ordinance is one of the legal means by which the City implements the
Comprehensive Plan_ Under Minnesota statute, zoning is to conform with a city's comprehensive plan.
The proposed rezoning is consistent with the adopted and draft land use plans. Exhibits B and C
provide a listing of the uses, both permitted and conditional, that are allowed in the Agricultural
Preservation (AG) and Urban Residential (R -113) zones. Copies of the land use plans are available
for viewing at City Hall and will be made available at the July 5, 2001 meeting.
FINDINGS:
The criteria required for the granting of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment are listed below with proposed
findings for the Commission's consideration.
Criteria #I That the original Zoning Ordinance is in error;
Finding 3 Development of the suhject property for residential use will he consistent with desired
development patterns for this area of the City.
Criteria #4 That the comprehensive plan requires a different provision.
Finding 44 The requested zoning is consistent with the adopted and proposed Comprehensive Plan
land use map.
ALTERNATIVES:
1 _ Recommend to the City Council the approval of the request to rezone the subject property from
Agricultural Preservation (AG) to Urban Residential (R -113).
Z. Do not recommend to the City Council the approval of the request to rezone the subject property
from Agricultural Preservation (AG) to Urban Residential (R -1B)_
3_ Continue the public hearing and request additional information from the applicant or staff.
4. Close the public hearing, but table the matter and request additional information.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No_ 1, recommend to the City Council the approval of the request to
rezone the subject property from Agricultural Preservation (AG) to Urban Residential (R -1B).
ACTION QUESTE
Offer and approve a moti on D: l the approval of the request to rezone the
on to recommend to the City Counci
subject property from Agricultural Preservation (AG) to Urban Residential (R -1B)_
4 u1 i lie Klima
a
Planner II
,-Aboaa-pc\200 1 \07- 05\rzot -Schul tz. doc
Los
r -
-------------
- -------------
7 <
RR
0
Zoning Boundary
Parcel Boundary
s
§1122
S 1, p The purpose of the agricultural preservation zone is to pceserve and promoz
agriculture in the unsewered areas of the City which are suitable for such use, to prevent scatteri
an d worog non-farm growth, and to prevent premature expenditures for such public services
roads, sewer, water, and poiceL and fire protection-
y J.. 2. Perm U t agricultural « pre z•; no structure or _ >• �': b
use e xcept for one of •: - of - following use
A.
agricultural uses;
S.
single family detached gs;
C.
forestry and nursery uses;
D.
seasonal produce stands;
E.
riding academies;
F.
utility services;
G. public recreation;
H. public buildings;
1. day care facilities serving twelve (12) or fewer persons;
J. adult day care centers as permitted uses, subject to the following conditions: The
adult day care center shall:
page r•w•a in MG
1111
§11.22
C. in a multifunctional organization, any space occupied by persom
associated with the multifunctional organization while participants
are using common space; and
5. comply with all other state licensing requirements. (Ord. 482. May 15,
1997)
J. group famiy day care facilities serving fourteen (14) or fewer children; or
K. residential facilities serving six (6) or fewer persons.
Subd. 3. Cond j ai Uses. Within the agricultural preservation zone, no structure or land shall ba
used for the following uses except by conditional use permit:
A. commercial feedlots, which include yards, lots, pens, buildings. or other areas or
structures used for the confined feeding of livestock or other animals for food, fur,
pleasure, or resale purposes;
B. (Deleted. Ord - 501, September 18, 1997)
C. retail sales of nursery and garden supplies;
D. cemeteries;
E. churches and other places of worship;
F. agricultural research facilities, which are facilities specifically operated for the
purpose of conducting research in the production of agricultural crops, including
research aimed at developing plant varieties. This tens specifically excludes
research regarding the development or research of soil conditioners, fertilizers, or
other chemical additives placed in or on the soil or for the experimental raising of
animals;
G. animal hospitals and veterinary clinics;
H. kennels. A kennel is any premise in which more than two (2) domestic animals,
over six (6) months of age, are boarded, bred or offered for sale;
L public or private schools having a course of instruction approved by the Minnesota
Department of Education for students enrolled in K through a 12, or any portion
thereof;
J. commercial recreation, minor,
K. utility service structures;
L day care facilities serving thirteen (13) through sateen (16) persons;-
, adult day care centers as conditional use, subject to the following conditions: The
adult day care centers shall:
1, serve thirteen (13) or more persons;
p•q• rm"d m 1997
1112
2. provide proof of an adequate water and sewer system if not served by
municipal utilities;
3. have outdoor leisureirecreaation areas located and designed to minimize
visual and noise impacts on adjacent areas;
4, the total indoor space available for use by participants must equal at least
fourty (40) square feet for each day care participant and each day rare staff
member present at the center. When a center is located in a
multifunctional organization, the center may share a common space with
the multifunctional organization if the required space available for use by
participants is maintained while the center is operating. In determining the
square footage of usable indoor space available, a center must not count:
a. hallways, stairways, closets, offices, restrooms and utility and
storage areas;
b. more than 25°0 of the space occupied by the furniture or
equipment used by participants or staff; or
C. in a multifunctional organization, any space occupied by persons
associated with the multifunctional organization while participants
are using common space;
S. provide proof of state, federal and other governmental licensing agency
approval; and
6. comply with all other state licensing requirements; (Ord. 482, May 15, 1997)
N. residential facilities serving from seven (7) through sixteen (16) persons;
0, wind energy conversion systems or windmills;
P. relocated structures;
Q, structures over two and one -half (2 -1/2) stories or thirty -five (35) feet in height;
R. developments containing more than one (1) principal structure per lot; or
S. other uses similar to those permitted by the subdivision, upon a determination by
the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, may be allowed upon the issuance of a
Conditional Use PermiL (Ord. 528, October 29,1998)
Subd 4 pwmitted'Accessory u ses. Within the agricultural preservation zone the following uses
shall be permitted accessory uses:
A. machinery and structures necessary to the conduct of agricultural operations;
-=
p W .,,~d in s
1113
1 §1122
C.
fences;
D.
recreational equipment;
E
stables;
F.
swimming pools;
G.
solar equipment;
H.
tennis courts;
I. receive only satellite dish antennas and other antenna devices;
J. home occupations contingent upon approval of a home occupation permit; or (Ord_
5o1, September 18, 1997)
K. other accessory uses, as determined by the Zoning Administrator.
Subd S. Design Standard Within the agricultural preservation zone, no land shall be used, and
no structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following requirements:
A. Maximum density: one dwelling per forty (40) acres.
B. lot specifications:
Minimum lot width: 1000 feet.
Minimum lot depth: 1000 feet_
Minimum front yard setback: 100 feet.
Minimum side yard setback- 20 feet.
Minimum rear yard setback: 40 feet.
C. Maximum height: Thirty -five (35) feet. Grain elevators, barns, silos, and elevator
lags may exceed this limitation without a conditional use permit.
Subd 6 Additional Requirem
A. All dwellings shall have a depth of at least twenty (20) feet for at least 50% of their
width. All dwellings shall have a width of at least twenty (20) feet for at least 50% of
their depth.
B. All dwellings shall have a permanent foundation in conformance with the Minnesota
State Building Code. (Ord. 31, October 25, 1979; Ord. 264, May 26, 1989; Ord-
279, December 1, 1989; Ord 304, November 7,1991; Ord 317, July 7, 1994; Ord
435, November 30, 1995)
SEC. 11.23. Reserved-
pWQ,v,.w in 1997
1114
s ;
§11.28
A. All dwellings shall have a depth of at least twenty (20) feet for at least 50% of their
width. All dwellings shall have a width of at least twenty (20) feet for at least 50% of
their depth.
B. All dwellings shall have a permanent foundation in conformance with the Minnesota
State Building Code. (Ord. 377, July 7,1994; Ord. 435, November 30, 1995)
SEC. 1127. Reserved.
SEC. 1128. URBAN RESIDE ZONE (R-1 B).
Subd. 1,_ Purpose, The purpose of the urban residential zone is to provide an area for residential
development where public sanitary sewer and water are available.
Subd Permitted Uses. Within the urban residential zone, no structure or land shall be used
except for one (1) or more of the following uses:
A, single family detached dwellings;
B. existing single family attached dwellings;
C. existing two (2) family dwellings;
D. public recreation;
E. utility services;
F. public buildings;
G. day care facilities serving twelve (12) or fewer persons;
H. adult day care centers as permitted uses, subject to the following conditions: the
adult day care center shall:
1. serve twelve (12) or fewer persons;
2. provide proof of an adequate water and sewer system if not served by
municipal utilities;
3. have outdoor leisure/recreation areas located and designated to minimize
visual and noise impacts on adjacent areas;
. the total indoor space available for use by participants must equal at least
forty (40) square feet for each day care participant and each day care staff
member present at the center. When a center is located in a
multifunctional organization if the required space available for use by
participants is maintained while the center is operating. In determining the
square footage of usable indoor space available, a center must not count:
a. hallways, stairways, closets, offices, restrooms, and utility and
storage areas;
psgo revised in 1997
1129
§11.28
b. more than 25% of the space occupied by the furniture or
equipment used by participants or staff; or
C. in a multifunctional organization, any space occupied by persons
associated with the multifunctional organization while participants
are using common space; and
S. comply with all other state ricensing requirements. (Ord. 482, May 15,
1997)
I. group family day care facir'dies serving fourteen (14) or fewer children;
J. residential facilities serving six (6) or fewer persons; or
K. single family detached residences previously constructed as accessory uses to a
church, where the resulting lot meets the design standards found in Subdivision 5 of
this Section. (Ord. 496, August 21, 1997)
Subd 3. Conditional Uses. Within the urban residential zone, no structure or land shall be used
for the following uses except by conditional use permit:
A. churches and other places of worship;
B. (Deleted, Ord. 501, September 18, 1997)
D. cemeteries;
D. public or private schools having a course of instruction approved by the Minnesota
Board of Education for students enrolled in K through grade 12, or any portion
thereof;
E. bed and breakfast inns;
F. utility service structures;
G. day care facilities serving thirteen (13) through sixteen (16) persons;
H. adult day care centers as permitted uses, subject to the following conditions: the
adult day centers shall:
1, serve thirteen (13) or more persons;
2, provide proof of an adequate water and sewer system if not served by
municipal utilities;
3. have outdoor leisuretrecreation areas located and designed to minimize
visual and noise impacts on adjacent areas;
page rowed in 1997
1130
§11.28
4. the total indoor space available for use by participants must equal at least
forty (40) square feet for each day rare participant and each day care staff
member present at the center. When a center is located in a
mutfunctional organization, the center may share a common space with
the multifunctional organization if the required space available for use by
participants is maintained while the center is operating. In determining the
square footage of usable indoor space available, a center must not count:
a. hallways, stairways, closets, offices, restrooms and utility and
storage areas;
b, more than 25% of the space occupied by the furniture or
equipment used by participants or staff; or
C. in a multifunctional organization, any space occupied by persons
associated with the multifunctional organization while participants
are using common space;
5. provide proof of state, federal and other governmental licensing agency
approval; and
6. comply with all other state licensing requirements. (Ord. 482, May 15,
1997)
1. residential facilities servicing from seven (7) through sixteen (16) persons;
J. relocated structures;
K. structures over two and one -half (2 -1/2) stories or thirty -five (35) feet in height;
L, developments containing more than one (1) principal structure per lot; or
M. other uses similar to those permitted by the subdivision, upon a determination by
the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, may be allowed upon the issuance of a
Conditional Use Permit. (Ord. 501, September 18, 1997; Ord. 528, October 29,
1998)
Subd 4 Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the urban residential zone, the following uses shall
be permitted accessory uses:
A. gages;
B. fences;
C. recreation equipment;
D. gardening and other horticultural uses not involving retail sales;
E. communication service apparatus/device(s) as permitted accessory uses, subject to
the following conditions:
1. shall be co- located on an existing tower or an existing structure;
p" mmod in 1991
1131
§1128
2. must not exceed 175 feet in total height (including the extension of any
communication service device(s) apparatus);
3. fights and/or flashing equipment shall not be permitted unless required by
state or federal agencies;
4, signage shall not be allowed on the communication service
device(s)/apparatus other than danger or warning type signs;
5, must provide proof from a professional engineer that the equipment will not
interfere with existing communications for public safety purposes;
6, shall be located and have an exterior finish that minimizes visibility off -site
to the maximum extent possible;
7, applicable provisions of the City Code, including the provisions of the State
Building Code therein adopted, shall be complied with;
g, all obsolete or unused towers and accompanying accessory facilities shall
be removed within twelve (12) months of the cessation of operations at the
site unless a time extension is approved by the City. After the facilities are
removed, the site shall be restored to its original or an approved state. The
user of the tower and/or accompanying accessory facilities shall be
responsible for the removal of facilities and restoration of the site;
9, the applicant shall submit a plan illustrating all anticipated future location
sites for communication towers and/or communication
devices (s) /apparatus;
10, wireless telecommunication towers and antennas will only be considered
for City parks when the following conditions exist and if those areas are
recommended by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and approved
by the City Council:
• City parks of sufficient size and character that are adjacent to an
existing commercial or industrial use;
• commercial recreation areas and major playfields used primarily by
adults;
11. all revenue generated through the lease of a City park for wireless
telecommunication towers and antennas should be transferred to the Park
Reserve Fund; (Ord. 479, March 13, 1997)
••.
G. tennis courts;
H. home occupations contingent upon approval of a home occupation permit, (Ord_
5o1, September 18, 1997)
L solar equipment; or
pogo raved in INS
1132
§1129
J. other accessory uses, as determined by the Zoning Administrator.
Subd S. Design Standards. Within the urban residential zone, no land shall be used, and no
structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following requirements:
A. Maximum density: five (5) dwellings per acre. Streets shall be excluded in
calculating acreage.
B. Maximum impervious surface percentage: 50%
C. Lot specifications:
Minimum lot width (single - family detached): 60 feet; _
(existing two - family dwelling): 70 feet
Minimum lot depth: 100 feet
Minimum front yard setback: 30 feet
Minimum side yard setback: 10 feet
Minimum rear yard setback: 30 feet
D. Maximum height: No structure shall exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height without a
conditional use permit.
Subd. 6. Ad ditional Requirements
A. All dwellings shall have a depth of at least twenty (20) feet for at least 50% of their
width. All dwellings shall have a width of at least twenty (20) feet for at least 50% of
their depth.
B. All dwellings shall have a permanent foundation in conformance with the Minnesota
State Building Code. (Ord. 31, October 25, 1979; Ord. 60, May 14,1981; Ord. 159,
February 28, 1985; Ord. 264, May 26, 1989; Ord. 377, July 7, 1994; Ord. 435,
November 30, 1995)
SEC. 1129. Reserved.
pps rased in 1997
1133
IMM&M
Minnesota's Enduring Standard of Value
9 May 2001
To the attention of : Honorable Jon Brekke, Mr. Robert Sweeney, Mr. Gary Morke, Mr. Cletus
Link, leis. Deb Amundson, lair. Michael Leek, Planning Commission and Staff Members
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee, MN 55379
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Over the pasts years Orrin Thompson Homes has been very active in the City of Shakopee. In a
continued effort to contribute to the community we are asking for rezoning from agricultural to
Rl -B on 9.27 acres adjacent to our Prairie Village Community. This 9.27 acre parcel is a
continuation of Prairie Village and will most likely be called Prairie Village 7th addition. We
will continue to market our "University" home product which has proved to be very successful in
this community.
As we plan for the future of our community we endorse the Valley View project and would like
to see it proceed as scheduled. With the improvement of Valley View we agree to pay the lateral
benefits as per the City Engineering Assessment policy, with this we will expect consideration
for the +/- 1 acre R.O.W taking along Valley View. If for any reason this project does not
proceed as scheduled we would expect the S araz n Street improvements to commence this
summer.
This rezoning request is consistent with the comprehensive guide plan and we look for a
favorable decision.
Respect lly ubmitted:
Cory L er
Orrin Thompson Homes
8421 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 300 o Golden Valley, Minnesota 55426
(763) 544 -7333 phone (763) 544 -9086 fax
/S X3.1,
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
CASE NO.: 01096
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Mark Noble, Planner I
SUBJECT: Approval of a Registered Land Survey
Render -Bank Limited Partnership (Applicant)
DATE: July 24, 2001
coil I Li
Introduction
Render Bank Limited Partnership is requesting approval of a Registered Land Survey for a
platted parcel of property. The property is located at the southeast corner of Vierling
Drive East and County Road 17 (Exhibit A). The property will consist of three (3) lots,
one each for Applebees, Arby's /Sbarro, and Kwik Trip /Jiffy Lube. Scott County
Recorder/Registrar of Titles has requested this process over a minor subdivision process
as a way to simplify the legal descriptions for the property.
Alternatives
1. Approve the Registered Land Survey submitted by Render Bank Limited Partnership,
subject to conditions recommended by staff.
2. Revise the conditions of approval for the Registered Land Survey, and approve subject
to the revised conditions.
3. Do not approve the Registered Land Survey.
4. Table action on this item and request additional information from the applicant and/or
staff.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Registered Land Survey submitted by Render Bank
Limited Partnership, subject to conditions (Alternative No. 1).
Action Requested
Offer Resolution No. 5559, a Resolution approving the Registered Land Survey submitted
by Render Bank Limited Partnership, subject to conditions, and move its approval.
3
�
1110
g \commdev \cc\2001 \0724\RLS- Render.rtf
RESOLUTION NO. 5559
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, APPROVING THE
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY SUBMITTED BY RENDER BANK LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
WHEREAS, the property upon which the request is being made is legally described as
follows:
Lot 2, Block 1, VIERLING PLAZA, Scott County, Minnesota;
WHEREAS, all notices of the public hearing for the Registered Land Survey were duly sent
and posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard
thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, as follows:
That the Registered Land Survey submitted by Render Bank Limited Partnership is hereby
approved subject to the following conditions:
A. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the filing/
recording of the Survey:
1. Approval of title by the City Attorney.
2. The developer shall provide easements along property lines and as
needed along shared utilities and public utilities.
B. The following conditions shall apply after the filingirecording of the Survey:
1. The developer shall pay existing levied special assessments or may
request that special assessments code be reapportioned against new lots.
If request is approved, developer shall pay the current fee for
reapportioning each assessment code and agree to the City Engineer's
reapportionment.
2. If subject site is platted in the future, drainage and utility easements shall
be dedicated to the City along all lot lines, and as required by City Code,
prior to the issuance of building permits.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to approve and accept said Registered Land Survey.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
held the day of 1 2001
Jon P. Brekke
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
R LS Subdivision due to request by Scott
leg County to simplify the descr
I
I I �
V
Zoning Boundary
Parcel Boundary
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY N0.
v
` I 6 e I
L \
♦\\ W
/ V)
LLJ
__j . ..........
\ cc
♦ / LJL
f ♦ y
_ r
i
VIERLING _ DRIVE o
- - - 100 - N86 °24'32 "W 360.99 - - -- --
- - - =� -48.71
- _ - - --- 5218=
DRAINAGE -
L_ J `- p UTILITY EASEMENT � - - - - - - -
\� '°3 rL O 5 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGASCO
z I ai 2Q TRACT A TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT
PER DOCUMENT NO. 58437
Z `� p W r ` ` `� - , - -DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT
< T ;/ PER t/EIRLING ADDITION
♦ v 0 2
L _ `/ DRAINAGE AND
i UTILITY EASEMENT
L1J
-- � N89 - E 36 76 T 1
Lll ® O f< i 1 i i K I i
L1J
0 `� I N TRACT B 00
/
L —J \ J - 10 /� - DRAINAGE AND
< -I- I -i U77LI TY. EASEMENT p
<c - _ -i \ z r,
/ - C) N89 ° 42'59'E 365.62
TRACT C \
L' LL O I
L1_
`-'
-DRAINAGE AND
NI
\ /// UTILITY EASEMENT -�
t;
s60 2 S7 ?,, \ r 10 -5
10-1 �
F
22 0 > \ 1 I
N89 ° 42'59 "E 166.52
/ D 0 T R/ W
P L A T N 0. 7 0— 5
STATE HIGHWAY N0. 169
DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND
ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED
ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, VIERLING PLAZA
PLAZA HAVING AN ASSUMED BEARING OF N00 0 43'18 "W.
0 100 200 300
SCALE IN FEET
SHEET 2 OF 2
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum CONSENT
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Upgrade of Domain Server for the Community Center Building
MEETING DATE: July 24, 2001
'11 1
Staff has been informed by LOGIS that problems with the running of the Park and
Recreation Department's main software, Class, relate to the inadequate size of the current
domain server. In addition, the additional server capacity will be needed to support
software upgrades that will need to be made as a result of Microsoft's impending
discontinuation of support. For that reason, staff recommends that the server upgrades
proposed by LOGIS be made at this time. Total cost of the upgrade is estimated to be
$5,880.00, and will be born by the MIS budget.
1. Approve the proposed expenditure of MIS funds to upgrade the domain server for the
Community Center building.
2. Do not approve the proposed expenditure of funds.
/ 1 �'`
Approve the proposed expenditure of MIS funds to upgrade the domain server for the
Community Center building.
D
R. Michael Leek
Community Development Director
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor & City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Extension Agreement with WSB & Associates, Inc. for Proposed
EAW on Blue Lake Watershed Outlet
DATE: July 24, 2001
INTRODUCTION:
Previously, a feasibility report was authorized by the City Council and prepared by WSB
& Associates, Inc. on alternatives for the Blue Lake Watershed Outlet. This agenda item
is for the City Council to consider authorizing a discretionary EAW for the Blue Lake
Watershed Outlet alternatives. It is proposed that the City's engineering consultant, WSB
& Associates, Inc., prepare the EAW. Costs of the EAW preparation are to be paid from
the City's Storm Drainage Trunk Fund.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council accepted the Blue Lake Watershed Outlet feasibility report on April 17,
2001 and directed staff to submit to the various agencies and organizations for comments.
The report was distributed to the following:
• Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
• Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community (SMSC)
• Prior Lake — Spring Lake Watershed District (PLSLWD)
• Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD)
• Scott County
• Shakopee Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA)
Comment letters were received from the DNR, SMSC, LMRWD, which are attached for
Council review. Also included is a letter dated April 17, 2001 presented to the City
Council by Linda Lehman, a hydrogeologist representing SEPA.
This report and comment letters were presented to the City's Environmental Advisory
Committee on July 11, 2001, and the committee voted 5 -0 to recommend that an EAW
be prepared for this outlet. The reason for this recommendation is that more analysis is
needed on the possible impacts to downstream water resources such as Dean Lake.
Attached is a proposal from WSB & Associates, Inc. on the preparation of the EAW and
the associated tasks. All three alternatives in the feasibility report will be analyzed in the
EAW.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Offer a motion authorizing an extension agreement with WSB & Associates, Inc.
for preparation of the EAW for the Blue Lake Watershed Outlet.
2. Do not authorize the extension agreement.
3. Table for additional information.
1 I 1. p
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 in order to determine the Blue Lake Watershed
Outlet alternatives for the future development of this area. This EAW will provide
additional information to address questions and concerns. Also, continued discussions
between the City and SMSC will be able to occur during this EAW process.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer a motion authorizing an extension agreement with WSB & Associates, Inc. for the
preparation of an EAW for the Blue Lake Watershed Outlet.
B ruce Loney
Public Works Director
BLpmp
EAW
der
s" te r` sr '
Re: Updated Scope of Services to Prepare an Environment Assessment Worksheet for
Blue Lake Watershed Outlet
Project No. 1281 -01
Dear Mr. Loney:
Outlined below, please find an updated Scope of Services to prepare an Environmental
Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Blue Lake Watershed Outlet for the City of
Shakopee. As discussed, while a mandatory EAW may not be absolutely required for this
project, the requirement is open to some debate and the residents seem to have extensive
concerns related to the project that may warrant the preparation of a discretionary EAW on
the part of the City. By preparing a discretionary EAW, the public and the regulatory
agencies will have opportunity to review and comment on the project prior to submitting
permit applications for the project and allow the City to address these issues through the
EAW review process.
Three different alternatives have been proposed for the Blue Lake Watershed Outlet as
outlined below:
Alternative 1: Construct storm sewer along County Road 83 to the K -Mart Linear
Pond
Alternative 2: Construct storm sewer north along County Road 83 to County Road
16 and then to Dean's Lake.
Alternative 3: Construct greenway corridor east to Prior Lake Outlet Channel
The environmental impacts associated with each of these alternatives will be evaluated from
County Road 83 downstream to the Minnesota River as part of the EAW. Outlined below
please find a description of the tasks to complete this work, costs associated with the tasks,
and potential schedules for the EAW.
4150 Olson'
Memorial Highway
Task 1 - Project Management /Meetings
This task entails coordinating the activities of WSB Staff working on the project and
Suite 300
reviewing the information that is developed with appropriate City Staff and Council
Minneapolis
members. This task also includes two meetings with City Council to review the
Minnesota
EAW.
55422
763541.4800
F:\WPV7IN\1281- 02\052301bl.wpd
763.541.1700 FAX
Minneapolis - St. Cloud - Equal Opportunity Employer
Mr. Bruce Loney
City of Shakopee, MN
July 10, 2001
Page 2
Task 2 - Collect Background Information
Background information associated with the proposed construction and potential
impacts of the alternatives for the Blue Lake Watershed Outlet will be collected from
a variety of sources including the City, residents, consultants to the Dean's Lake
Homeowners Association, Minnesota Historical Society, the Department of Natural
Resources, the Watershed District, Scott County, the Soil and Water Conservation
District, and the US Fish and Wildlife Service. This data will be reviewed and
analyzed to address the environmental concerns of the project. It is anticipated that
one public meeting will be held as part of this task.
Task 3 - Identify Past Land Use and Existing Cover Types
Information from the City and agencies will be reviewed to determine past land uses
along the each of the potential outlet alignments that may present environmental
concerns such as soil contamination. Any concerns will be discussed within the
EAW. The existing and proposed cover types will be determined based on field
visits, aerial photography, and the proposed concept plans.
Task 4 - Ecological Review of Alternatives
As part of this task, a site visit of each the proposed alternative locations will be
conducted. The purpose of this site visit will be to evaluate the proposed project
alternatives for fish and wildlife habitat and review potential impacts on these
resources. This field review will be discussed in the EAW and the impact of the
Blue Lake Watershed Outlet on these resources will be evaluated.
Task S - Evaluate Project on Water Quantity
As part of this task, a hydraulic /hydrologic analysis of before and after conditions
will be developed for each alternative. This analysis will include existing and
proposed discharge rates, volumes, and anticipated water fluctuations within the
channel. This analysis will be discussed in the EAW and the impacts for each
alternative will be evaluated.
Task 6 - Evaluate Project Impact on Water Quality
The land owners and residents near Deans Lake are very concerned about the water
quality of the lake. As such, the impact of the Blue Lake Watershed Outlet on water
quality of Dean's Lake will be an important issue to address within the EAW. The
impact of each alternative on the surface water quality of Dean's Lake will be
evaluated using a water quality model. If water quality impacts are anticipated, a
mitigation plan will be discussed within the EAW.
FAWP VVW1281- 02 \052301b1.wpd
Mr. Bruce Loney
City of Shakopee, MN
July 10, 2001
Page 3
The relative impacts on groundwater infiltration and quality will be also evaluated
for each alternative. These impacts will be evaluated in a general, non - quantitative
analysis since a detailed groundwater analysis is not anticipated as part of this task.
Task 7 - Address Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures
The EAW will address erosion and sedimentation control measures to be taken
during and after construction for each alternative. The potential project site of each
alternative will be evaluated for steep slopes and highly erodible soils. The amount
of soil to be moved or excavated will also be determined and discussed within the
EAW.
Task 8 - Evaluate Impact on Historical Resources
Information from the Minnesota State Historical Preservation Office, which will
include information on archaeological, historical, and architectural resources, will be
evaluated for each alternative. If impacts to these resources are anticipated, a
mitigation plan will be developed in conformance with State standards.
Task 9 - Identify Impact on Public Infrastructure
As part of the EAW, any new or expanded public services that are required as part of
each alternative will be identified.
Task 10 - Evaluation of Cumulative Impacts
As part of this task, the cumulative impacts of each alternative on the surrounding
area will be evaluated. Cumulative impacts could include increased development
near the outlet channel, long -term impacts on directing water downstream, and
impacts on surface water elevations in the area.
Task 11 - Submit EAW and Respond to Comments
As part of this task, the EAW will be provided to City Staff and City Council for
review. Once authorization from the City has been received, WSB will distribute the
EAW to the required agencies and EQB Monitor for the 30 -day review. WSB will
follow -up with the EAW review process and respond to comments generated by the
public review process.
It is anticipated that there may be significant comments associated with the public
review of this EAW. Following completion of the review process, we will present
the findings of the EAW to the Council and provide a recommendation relative to the
need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
The cost estimate to prepare the EAW as outlined above is estimated to cost $26,300 with a
range from $22,600 to $31,100 with a not -to- exceed cost of $31,100. A proposed project
F:MP VMd \1281- 02 \052301b1_ Wpd
Mr. Bruce Loney
City of Shakopee, MN
July 10, 2001
Page 4
schedule is attached. Based on the proposed timeline, the EAW process could be completed
by December 4, 2001.
Please call me at (763)287 -7188 if you have any questions or to authorize the work
associated with this project.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Pete Willenbring, P.E.
Vice President
attachments
C. Michael Leek, City of Shakopee
F: \WP WIN\1281- 02 \05230IN.wpd
TIME LINE TO PREPARE AN EAW FOR BLUE LAKE WATERSHED OUTLET
TASK
TIME LINE #1
Authorization to Proceed*
July 11, 2001
1.
Data Collection
July 11 - August 6,2001
2.
EAW Development
July 11 - September 24, 2001
4.
City Staff/Council Review of EAW
September 24 - October 2, 2001
5.
City Council Authorizes Submittal of EAW
to Review Agencies
October 2, 2001
6.
Submit EAW to EQB Monitor
October 8, 2001
7.
Publication in EQB Monitor
October 15, 2001
8.
EAW Comment Period
November 14, 2001
9.
Respond to Comments
November 14 - 26, 2001
10.
City Staff / Council Reviews Responses to
Comments
November 26 - December 4, 2001
11.
City Council Determines Need for EIS
December 4, 2001
12.
Decision Notice Published in EQB Monitor
December 24, 2001
* Schedule assumes authorization to begin work by July 11, 2001. If authorization to
proceed is given at a later date, the schedule may be delayed.
F: \WP WIN\1281 -02 \052301 bl.wpd
Estimated Estimated
Hours: Hours:
Approximate Minimum minimum Maximum Maximum
Task Billing Rate Estimate Subtotal Estimate Subtotal
r
,f & 3? 'gq�p h
•Y C �1Y` - K
Principal $99 10 $990 15 $1,485
Engineering Technician $65 2 $130 5 $325
Biologic $65 4 $260 7 $455
Subtotal
16
$1,380
27
$2,265
`cer
-i r
r
r �,
rK
�� P AR
� 'x�4`.
t
���iElGg����.�.t+<x:'�`"H
gar,` t _ � �y
hs� r
F
r
�: � ,
'i`_� '
Principal
$99
10
$990
15
$1,485
Engineering Technician
$65
2
$130
5
$325
Biologic
$65
10
$650
12
$780
Subtotal
22
$1,770
32
$2,590
f i���C4T4tC�[icRt ELE��'
' v'�F'
,S' < ''C*z" o F'A ?wTN c,"`-
`,''Stan. 4'�'
3, }✓
„;+
ve
�`Y�S3i:��_ai..�v:
�
`.v�4.�',- 4 .i�.z_:�.!n - e��" - s �z�`. v. Y�N�wa.xa_....�sw... �
c�vv<:�a`Y, -�
` aJ:�..+�"sm.. <
ix'i'`,T1�t E"•,.G�n� .�'
�+:.�� vmi`�
.:i:��..s..'�v�+.�.°_
Principal
$99
1
$99
1
$99
Engineering Technician
$65
1
$65
1
$65
Biologic
$65
5
$325
5
$325
Subtotal
7
$489
7
$489
0.
? + rte ,
� . 77
_F
Principal
$99
1
$99
1
$99
Engineering Technician
$65
1
$65
1
$65
Biologic
$65
12
$780
16
$1,040
Subtotal
13
$944
17
$1,204
�. y` iF''\ C.
z `�
s`t�"x , ` F -Ts �t-�A 5
11 7 M g'\ t
ro- w�a{3v zx y.
4�- a` -,.as- '
'r' `.,v
�0.y� 1��,,��"��i t
t`a..
vxff s r ,
g"ss�,xz- �
�v
�i�"` ''�
,�
�i
R;
- w
.F`�y, 4
>w
,°€` v5
���':1.. ''
�"
Principal
$99
15
$1,485
24
$2,376
Engineering Technician
$65
35
$2,275
42
$2,730
Biologic
$65
5
$325
10
$650
Subtotal
55
$4,085
76
$5,756
"` ' ?) :yY
''�
,�.
04.C£v"`�,�ck�.
Principal
$99
15
$1,485
24
$2,376
Engineering Technician
$65
35
$2,275
42
$2,730
Biologist
$65
1 5
$325
10
$650
Subtotal
1 5
$4,085
10
1 $5,756
7� Addxess�oszaratrS�drnrentatror
r
t ;
Contrrr�lfeasssre�'
Principal
$99
5
$495
7
$693
Engineering Technician
$65
10
$650
15
$975
Biologist
$65
8
$520
12
$780
Subtotal
23
$1,665
34
$2,448
v
Principal
$99
1
$99
1
$99
Engineering Technician
$65
1
$65
1
$65
Biologist
$65
5
$325
5
$325
Subtotal
7
$489
7
$489
a.,
�
"�.t.,»,/+Jv.:�
<..,.mw�x2�.
3.sf'. r<,Lea`w.v.S ,�>`bYoLi�"
3iwri„�.�u...,:.:m.z,. ..� � v�...,...su,� ��ax.?;m4. �e..._W &...M.,v.a'c.�
Principal
•."�... �.._.e.r.�.�ra.,...�
$99
a...ax...,,zN. .. a_..a.'Jrwa».:�.'F
4
_ a__
$396
.�w.YS
4
$396
Engineering Technician
$65
5
$325
6
$390
Biologist
$65
7
$455
8
$520
Subtotal
16
$1,176
18
$1,306
- �•i.�i
ta��$»,r�:s� �,�a
� 'w »n�f«�:.
»�ur� ...- w.z�u�n��.+.�e- ...wk�.�:.,..,....+m r.ra .'.a�a&A... ,__, .-w�JF
b, a.N( a�YW..nZ ..,.R
..v.�wYrsf �.��i:w�.
�
5
$495
Principal
$99
4
$396
Engineering Technician
$65
5
$325
7
$455
Biologist
$65
8
$520
10
$650
Subtotal
17
$1,241
22
$1,60
Sttr��Nentr�on , x
�' Y T+{✓"
rrcrs
r
ti' t `� 2 }
z
1 Y
z
ai �i .�Sai
r 2
� �'
S
`'`� �
3 "� �.
�F
� � ��.x�w,✓ `2s
,�,� �.�` :,t'x. �
ref ���.€
��*` � = `�'�
��S„utz"
� _ k
MI, S �" ,�„ �Y c�lM
Principal
$99
27
$2,673
37
$3,663
Engineering Technician
$65
20
$1,300
27
$1,755
Biologic
$65
20
$1,300
27
$1,755
Sub total
67
$5,273
91
$7,173
TOTAL $22,597 $31,076
To: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
From: Mark J. McQuillan, Natural Resources Director
Subject: Blue Lake Watershed Outlet EAW
Date: July 12, 2001
Bruce,
After careful review of the Blue Lake Watershed Feasibility Report and comments taken
from the various regulatory agencies and interested parties, the Shakopee Environmental
Advisory Committee went on record at its July 11, 2001 meeting recommending on a 5 -0
vote the City Council conduct an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the four
alternatives proposed in the feasibility report.
Mark J. McQuillaW
Natural Resources Director
Technical & Regulatory Evaluations Group, Inc.
13231 Henning Circle NE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Voice (612) 496 -0594 Fax (612) 496 -2097
E -Mail - Illehman@aoLcom
I / I I I
Apil 17 2 I!
Good Evening Mayor and Council Members, my name is Linda Lehman, I am a licensed
hydrogeologist in the State of Minnesota and President of Technical & Regulatory Evaluations
Group. I have significant environmental concerns regarding several action items on your agenda
this evening. I would like to first take a minute to give you some background hydrologic
information about the area of Dean's Lake, Blue Lake and Eagle Creek watersheds, then I will
specifically address the issues individually.
Backgound
Last fall, I was retained by the citizens surrounding Dean's Lake to investigate the reasons for
the declining lake levels. Dean's Lake is a unique water resource, in that it has essentially little
in the way of natural inflow. It is largely sustained by the level of shallow groundwater in the
region and therefore its level is considered to be a surface expression of the water table. Over
time the natural rainfall - recharge relationships have been disrupted. The reasons for this could
be numerous, but suspected are underground pipelines creating permeable conduits and surface
water retention ponds with outlets lower than the water table which could be draining away the
groundwater in this region.
Due to rapid growth in the southwestern suburbs and the concern over protecting some of our
more important water resources such as the Boiling Springs, Eagle Creek and the Savage Fen,
the Metropolitan Council organized the Southwest Metropolitan Area Ground Water Working
Group to advise the City governments in the area about how best to handle the development
pressures with as little adverse impact as possible to these valued and sensitive natural water
resources. Subsequently the Metropolitan Council and the DNR have developed working
groundwater models of the region around Boiling Springs, Savage Fen and Eagle Creek.
At the January meeting of the Working Group, we discussed the problem of Dean's Lake and the
need to find out what is causing the lowering of the water table. The proximity of some of the
projects being considered this evening to Boiling Springs and their effect on maintaining the
water levels in Eagle Creek is problematic. These resources are dependent upon a continued
recharge from the shallow groundwater system. It was decided by the Working Group and
Metropolitan Council to therefore request a groundwater monitoring plan be developed to try
and ascertain the causes for the decline around Dean's Lake.. The Lower MNWSD was placed
1
yy
, T .
in c of this study. This study was just started and a consultant is to be hired to compile
ex information first. After this, monitoring well placements will be discussed.
IMM
The Low_ er Minnesota River Watershed District in their January 18, 2001 letter from Kevin
Begalke to R. Michael Leek, regarding their review of the Shakopee Crossings, First addition
grading and drainage plan had several important comments, which have apparently not been
considered for Shakopee Crossings and other nearby developments. They are as follows:
"There has been considerable concern about how this and other projects and the storm
ponds, might impact the groundwater feeding Boiling Springs and Deans' Lake. I would
recommend that the storm water ponds be lined ponds, rather than infiltration ponds to
avoid any lowering of the groundwater table."
"Further I would sug that the elevation of the ponds or the elevation of the outlet
structures be equal to or higher than the water elevation of Dean's Lake. This again,
would help minimize any potential for lowering of the groundwater table in the area."
"Utilities in this sandy soil should be constructed with seepage collars so that the
groundwater is not improperly drained for the site area. There is a reasonable proximity
to Boiling Springs and therefore any interference with that groundwater occurrence
would not be considered acceptable."
Why is this significant and being brought up tonight?
I am telling you this tonight in the hopes that some of these projects can be looked at in terms
loss of recharge, impervious surface, potential drainage of the water table in the region and also
in terms of environmental impacts to Dean's Lake and other important resources of the region,
before being pushed through. It may take a little time for the groundwater study to be completed
and interpreted, but as the old saying goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Groundwater cures are expensive.
Regarding the Storm water Feasibility Study of Option 3.
It is my opinion that the Environmental Consequences of Option 3 have not been properly
2
r
Dean Lake Bypass Project as follows:
"It was generally agreed that this bypass project was being considered for the following reasons:
To protect the quality of water in Deans Lake from being impacted as a result of
additional runoff rates and volume being directed to Deans Lake from the upstream water
shed which will be subject to development in the future."
"Construction of a partial bypass of water around Deans Lake represents a responsible
Storm water management activity that has the potential to protect Dean's Lake from
accelerated degradation in the future."
It would be more environmentally appropriate to bypass Dean's Lake with the contaminated
Storm water runoff, as in Option 1. The costs of Option 1 appear to be much less expensive than
Option 3 $2,983,000.00 vs. $3,745,000.00 for 3A and $5,442,000.00 for 3B. Therefore, I
request that before approving this project that an environmental assessment of these options be
made. If there is not sufficient capacity in the K -Mart pond, for Option 1 to be viable, then the 1
- 2 million dollar difference in cost between option 1 and 3 would go a long way in expanding
the capacity of an already degraded system vs completely ruining a rare and relatively pristine
groundwater fed lake.
The feasibility study is inadequate because it does not evaluate the environmental consequences
of any of these options. We also have not heard whether the Sioux Community will grant,
permission for Option 3.
If you have any questions, please feel free
LO
MINNESOTA RIVER
WATERSHE
Scott County Government Center
200 4" Avenue West
Shakopee, MN 55379
Tel: (952) 496 -8842, Fax: (952) 496 -8844
May 17, 2001
Bruce Loney
Public Works Director
129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee, MN 55379 -1351
Dear Mr. Loney:
Terry L. Schwalhe, President
Office: (612) 404 -5312, Fax: (612) 404 -5318
Wallace E. Neal, Vice President
Office: (952) 884 -1632, Fax: (952) 884 -7726
Glenda Spiotta, Secretary
Office: (952) 471 -0590, ext. 285, Fax: (952) 471 -0682
Edward A. Schlampp, Treasurer
Office: (612) 920 -4398, Fax: (612) 920 -0086
Ron Kraemer, Asst. Treasurer
Cell: (651) 335 -8305, Fax: (952) 894 -3235
Kevin D. Bigalke, Administrator
Office: (952) 496 -8842, Fax (952) 496 -8844
The Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Board of Managers (District) would like
to thank you for giving the District an opportunity to review and provide comments on
the Blue Lake Watershed Outlet Feasibility Report. The District commends the City of
Shakopee on your efforts to identify a design that will address the storm water issues of
this area.
The Board of Managers has reviewed the Feasibility Study. At this time the Board does
not feel that it has had enough time or information to make a recommendation for a
design to use for this area. The District feels that more information is needed on the
design alternatives identified in the Study and offers the following comments for your
consideration.
1. The District feels that none of the four design alternatives adequately incorporates
infiltration into the designs. As you are aware, this area has a 0.1 cfs /acre
discharge rate requirement. Because of the porous and permeable nature of the
sandy soils in this area, infiltration is the ideal method to use to meet the
discharge requirement.
�. The District does have concerns with each of the individual design alternatives
discussed in the study.
Alternative 1
1. This alternative appears basically to be a big pipe to remove the water off site into
an existing pond.
2. The design does not describe how ponding requirements as defined in the
Shakopee Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan will be met. Will
ponding be required onsite for each subdivision or will a larger "regional" pond
be constructed before outletting via the pipe?
3. Alternative 1 does not appear to incorporate any infiltration into the design.
4. The District recommends that infiltration basins rather than the traditional lined
NURP pond design be studied and used. By incorporating infiltration ponds, the
sizing of the pipe could markedly be reduced.
5. Also, with designed infiltration basins onsite, there may be very little actual
runoff or discharge from the area.
Alternative 2
1. The District does not feel that design alternative 2 is an option. If water were
going to be discharged into Dean's Lake properly, it would be more practicable to
use the Prior Lake Outlet Channel rather than building a new storin water
conveyance system.
2. Again, this alternative does not incorporate infiltration.
Alternative 3
1. The District feels more study and information is needed on this design alternative.
2. The study describes this alternative a very large open channel.
3. The study again does not discuss infiltration as part of this design.
4. It appears that this design is essentially a large channel that will act as a regional
stormwater pond. If so, will it be designed as a regional infiltration basin?
Currently, very little water runs off from this area.
5. The District recommends that this alternative be studied further as an infiltration
pond, not a NURP pond.
6. The District also has concerns about the volume of water that would be going to
Dean's Lake from this design if it were not designed as an infiltration basin.
What will the impact of discharging the volume of water from this area be on the
existing Prior Lake Outlet Channel? What will the impacts be on the Lake of this
volume of water and the potential bounce in Dean's Lake?
7. The District likes the idea of creating a greenway corridor as part of this design.
We cominend the City for looking beyond their stormwater needs and identifying
a way to create a community amenity.
Alternative 4
1. The District needs more information as to why this design is considered
temporary.
2. If more ponding, preferably infiltration basins, is needed to meet the 0.1 cfs /acre
discharge requirement then that should be a design requirement.
3. How often would pumping of the ponds really be needed?
4. If designed for infiltration, rather than as NURP ponds, it is possible that the
ponds would not have to be pumped except under very extreme conditions.
5. The District recommends that this alternative be studied further as a permanent
alternative incorporating infiltration basins.
The soils of the area need to be identified and their permeability and porosity evaluated.
How deep do these soils go? It is the District's understanding that these soils are 50 to 60
feet in depth. If this is the case, they would provide an excellent conduit for stormwater
to be delivered to the groundwater table.
Overall, the District also has concerns about the quality and quantity of water being
discharged from the design alternatives. The District has identified Dean's Lake as a
Level III water body supporting fishing, aesthetic viewing activities and wildlife in the
District's Water Management Plan. The DNR also identifies Dean's Lake as a Natural
Environment water body. What will the impacts be to the Prior Lake Outlet Channel, the
K -Mart Linear Pond, Dean's Lake, as well as Blue Lake further downstream?
The District has had concerns brought to them by the residents of the Dean's Lake
Watershed regarding impacts on water quality and water quantity from the Prior Lake
Outlet Channel and Dean's Lake water level fluctuations periodically during the last few
years. The District is interested in the comments and concerns of the Prior Lake -Spring
Lake Watershed District, Scott County, the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community,
and the residents of the Dean's Lake Watershed regarding these issues and the design
alternatives identified in the Blue Lake Watershed Outlet Feasibility Report. Has there
been public input meetings regarding this study? The District feels that all of these
parties need to provide input on the study.
Because of the concerns raised in the items listed above, the Board of Managers does not
feel it can provide a recommendation on a design at this time. The Board also
recommends that further study be conducted to determine the benefits /impacts that
incorporating infiltration into the designs will have on the project.
Again, the District commends the City of Shakopee on your efforts to begin to identify a
design that will adequately address the stornwater runoff, water quality, and water
quantity issues as this area begins to develop. On behalf of the Lower Minnesota River
Watershed District Board of Managers, I thank you for giving the District an opportunity
to review and comments on the Blue Lake Watershed Outlet Feasibility Report. We look
forward to working with you on this and future projects.
Very truly yours,
Kevin D. Bigalke
District Administrator
cc: LMRWD Board of Managers
Paul Nelson — PLSLWD
Peter Willenbring — WSB & Associates
Stanley Ellison — SMSC
Scott Allen — Scott County
Kathy Gerlach — SEPA
IvE nnesota Department of Natural Resources
Metro Waters - 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 -6793
Telephone: (651) 772 -7910 Fax: (651) 772 -7977
June 6, 2001
'_ ��O_
Mr. Paul Nelson ;
Prior Lake - Spring Lake Watershed District {f t
16670 Franklin Trail SE, Suite 110
Prior Lake Minnesota 55372
RE: Feasibility Analysis, Prior Lake Outlet Channel
Dear Mr. Nelson:
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Feasibility Analysis for the Prior Lake Outlet Channel, dated
November 21. 2000, which was prepared for the City of Shakopee and the District, in a joint effort by WSB &
Associates and Montgomery Watson. Several interested parties last met March 26, 2001, at the Prior Lake library
to discuss the report.
Much of the report and our discussions on March 26 focused on how to equitably share costs for channel
improvements amongst the benefitted interests. The DNR will not take a position on that matter, and will leave it
up to the assorted local jurisdictions to come to some agreement in that regard.
Issues regarding stability of the Prior Lake outlet channel are longstanding. Slope, soil type, and the additional
hydrology provided from Prior Lake have had a measurable impact on the outlet channel I think there is agreement
that something must be done to accommodate current and anticipated future flows.
The DNR is supportive of a plan that maximi the original design efficiency of the Prior Lake outlet structure and
channel. From a regulatory perspective, our jurisdiction is limited to the outlet structure itself (and subsequent
operation), and most of the outlet channel itself, including several basins downstream of Prior Lake.
Segment 1, as depicted inthe report, is not regulated by DNR, with exception of Jeffer's Pond (DNR #70 -77W) itself
and the wetland immediately southwest of it (DNR 470- 153W).
All of Segments 2, 3, and 4, including Pike Lake ( #70 -76P) and Wetland #70 -249W are DNR protected waters. The
southerly approximately 1000' of Segment 5 (to the 90 degree bend towards Dean's Lake) is also regulated by the
Department.
Most of Segment 6 encompasses Dean's Lake itself. Dean's Lake is aNatural Environment basin regulated by DNR
It has been the subject of a number of groundwater studies over the years, and its hydrology has been altered by the
additional surface water it receives from the Prior Lake outlet since the early 1980's.
DNR Information: 651- 296 -6157 • 1- 888 - 646 -6367 • TTY: 651- 296 -5484 • 1- 800 -657 -3929
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Who Values Diversity
®'® Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a
®M�' Minimum of 10% Post - Consumer Waste
Paul Nelson
June 6, 2001
page 2
That portion of Segment 7 south of TPI 101 located in Sections 2 and 3 (about 2000) is a DNR-re
watercourse. Much of this has been degraded over time by the additional inputs from the Prior Lake outlet, and the
discharge from quarry dewatering at the adjacent and now abandoned CAMAS quarry.
The entire reach of Segment 8 is regulated by the DNR.
DNR is interested in the impacts of the proposed project on both the channel and the basins within the outlet chain.
In particular, what is the anticipated bounce in Jeffer's Pond, Pike Lake, and Dean's Lake for the 2, 5, and 10 year
storm events? As a rule of thumb, for basins with outlets, the ordinary high water elevation (O should be
reached or exceeded in response to a 5-year 24 hour storm event. Is there opportunity for the District or others to
provide for infiltration and additional storage on top of the bluff?
As I have indicated m the past, the DNR is not supportive of an armored channel from Prior Lake to Blue Lake, and
will not entertain a permit application for same. Attempts should be made to minimize riprap and structural facilities
in the design. We would expect any proposal that is submitted for permit approval to incorporate design features
which look to restore a more natural channel. This could be accomplished through incorporation of meanders in to
the channel, creation of a shallow floodplain, re- establishment of aquatic and transitional vegetation, or some
combination of these or other features. I do acknowledge that there will be situations that do warrant a hard, armored
or structural application to ensure channel stability and minimize future maintenance expenditure. These might be
expected at select locations along the project where crossings, slope, topography, or soil types render natura
na tion
impractical.
In addition to the channel improvements, there maybe opportunity to also create a trail corridor or greenway. Please
contact me to put you in touch with DNR staff who may have grant opportunities available for such components.
In closing, DNR recognizes the need for channel improvements to address existing and future anticipated flows
through the Prior Lake outlet channel, much of which is mapped as a DNR-protected watercourse. Final design
should incorporate measures to improve not only the hydraulic efficiency of channel, but the ecological integrity
of the channel as well.
Thank you for the opportunity to review the feasibility study. Please call me if you have any questions.
in
Patrick J. Lync�h Il
1 � � Ist
Area Hydr
c: Bruce Loney, City of Shakopee / Pete Willenbring, WSB & Associates
Bud ®smundson, City ofPrior Lake Lower Minnesota River Watershed District
Stan Ellison, Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community
2330 SIOUX TRAIL NW ® PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372
TRIBAL OFFICE: 9528445 -8900 ® FAX: 952 ®445 -8906
Subject: Comments on Blue Lake Watershed Outlet Study
Mr. Loney,
OFFICERS
Stanley R. Crooks
Chairman
Glynn A. Crooks
Vice Chairman
Lori K. Crowchild
Secretary/Treasurer
From an environmental perspective Alternative Three is the best solution to the problem. The
other alternatives may create environmental problems such as treating the water. These can be
dealt with but the feasibility study does not include treatment options or costs for treatment.
Alternative Three is an effective means to reduce runoff and increase infiltration. Due to the
surficial geology of the area this solution can be expanded upstream for a significant distance.
This area is located on a flood plain bench consisting of alluvium from the glacial River Warren.
As such, any area along the middle bench, both east and west of County Road 83, will be suitable
for infiltration.
One note of concern is that there does not appear to be any plans for a constructed waterway
upstream from County Road 83, and Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community lands should not
be considered unless the City of Shakopee intends to develop a waterway that acts as a series of
rate and volume control ponds through other developments.
I have included several notes on the benefits and disadvantages of each option. They are listed
below.
Alternative 1— Constructing a gravity outlet north along County Road 83 to the
Kmart linear pond.
Benefits
a
Polluted storm water surges will bypass Deans Lake.
Prior Lake outlet channel may not need a significant upgrade from the current
condition.
Disadvantages
• Watershed it altered. Low water levels in Deans Lake have been a concern in
recent years.
• An RCP pipe offers no opportunity for infiltration in an area where infiltration
may be greater than 10 inches per hour (Table 1, Figure A).
Water quality problem is not addressed. Water is not treated beyond what can be
expected at the individual subdivision storm water ponds.
Alternative 2 — Constructing a gravity outlet north along County Road 83, then
along the County Road 16 right of way to Deans Lake.
This option is least preferable because of the water quality implications for Deans Lake.
Benefits
• Additional water quantity for Deans Lake.
• Prior Lake outlet channel may not need a significant upgrade from the current
condition.
Disadvantages
• Biological and/or economic impacts from the expected water quality degradation
are not addressed. Water is not treated beyond what can be expected at the
individual subdivision storm water ponds. This will almost certainly degrade the
quality of water in Deans Lake and beyond.
• An RCP pipe offers no opportunity for infiltration in an area where infiltration
may be greater than 10 inches per hour (Table 1, Figure A).
• Watershed is altered, although not as extensive as in Alternative 1.
Alternative 3 — Constructing an open channel gravity system east from County
Road 83 across the Mdewakanton Sioux Property to the Prior Lake - Spring Lake
outlet channel.
Benefits
• Water follows original watershed flow direction.
• If designed to maximize infiltration and storage the Prior Lake outlet channel
may not need a significant upgrade.
Disadvantages
• If designed to maximize rate and volume control, and infiltration, this will likely
be the most costly alternative.
Again, Bruce, the review by Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community has been done at the
staff level. There will have to be additional discussions at the Council level regarding storm
water management, easements, and other land related issues. If you have any questions, please
do not hesitate to contact me at (952) 496 -6145.
Sincerely,
G illiam Rudnicki
SMSC Tribal Administrator
4F
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
From: Mark Themig, Facilities and Recreation Director
Date: 18 July, 2001
Subject: Amending the 2001 Part-Time Pay Plan, Resolution No. 5563
INTRODUCTION
City Council is asked to amend Resolution No. 5459, a Resolution approving the City's
2001 Part -Time Non -Union Employees Pay Plan.
BACKGROUND
The attached action continues our plan to address behavior issues that have occurred at
the Community Center, particularly over the winter months.
In order to aid in the enforcement of the Zero Tolerance Policy and improve
accountability, part-time staffing during evening and weekend shifts has been
restructured to include the new classification, Service Desk Attendant.
Under this structure, the Building Supervisor will have overall responsibility for the
facility, while the Service Desk Attendant will be primarily responsible for guest check -in,
program registration and general information.
REQUESTED ACTION
If City Council concurs, it should, by motion, adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 5563
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 5459 WHICH ADOPTED THE 2001
PART -TIME PAY PLAN FOR THE PART -TIME NON -UNION EMPLOYEES OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Mark Themig
Facilities and Recreation Director
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 5459 WHICH ADOPTED TH__2
00 FOR • •
EMPLOYEES OF OF •
WHEREAS, on December 5, 2000, the City Council of the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota, adopted Resolution No. 5459, approving the 2001 Part-
Time Pay Plan for the part-time and seasonal non -union employees of the City of
Shakopee; and
WHEREAS, the city's Park and Recreation Department has developed a
Zero Tolerance Policy for the enforcement of facility rules and regulations; and
WHEREAS, to aid in the enforcement of the Zero Tolerance Policy and
improve accountability, part-time staff on duty at the Community Center during
evening and weekend shifts has been restructured to include the new
classification, Service Desk Attendant. The Building Supervisor has overall
responsibility for the facility, while the Service Desk Attendant will be primarily
responsible for guest check -in, program registration and general information.
THEREFORE, it is necessary to amend the part-time pay plan by adding
the Service Desk Attendant classification, Grade F to the 2001 Part-time Pay
Plan.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the attached schedule of the 2001 Part-time
Pay is hereby amended to include the classification of Service Desk Attendant,
Grade F.
Adopted in
held this
day of
, 2001.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
TI
session of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
City Clerk
Amended 7/19/01
Start
6 months
1 year
2 years
3 years
Title
Grade
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Accountant
M
$13.6258
$14.0265
$14.4273
$15.2288
$16.0303
Engineering Inspector
M
$13.6258
$14.0265
$14.4273
$15.2288
$16.0303
Building Inspector
M
$13.6258
$14.0265
$14.4273
$15.2288
$16.0303
Snow Plow Operator
M
$13.6258
$14.0265
$14.4273
$15.2288
$16.0303
Recreation Instructors
L
$12.7821
$13.1581
$13.5340
$14.2859
$15.0378
Not Used
K
$11.9909
$12.3436
$12.6963
$13.4016
$14.1070
Not Used
1
$11.1997
$11.5292
$11.8586
$12.5174
$13.1762
Asst Aquatic Manager
I
$10.4995
$10.8083
$11.1I71
$11.7348
$12.3524
Code Enforcement Officer
H
$9.7993
$10.0875
$10.3757
$10.9522
$11.5286
Recording Secretary
H
$9.7993
$10.0875
$10.3757
$10.9522
$11.5286
Office Clerical Worker
H
$9.7993
$10.0875
$10.3757
$10.9522
$11.5286
Water Safety Instructor
H
$9.7993
$10.0875
$10.3757
$10.9522
$11.5286
Building Supervisor
H
$9.7993
$10.0875
$10.3757
$10.9522
$11.5286
Arena Supervisor
H
$9.7993
$10.0875
$10.3757
$10.9522
$11.5286
Maintenance Laborer
H
$9.7993
$10.0875
$10.3757
$10.9522
$11.5286
Mechanics Helper
H
$9.7993
$10.0875
$10.3757
$10.9522
$11.5286
Engineering Intern
H
$9.7993
$10.0875
$10.3757
$10.9522
$11.5286
Student Intern
G
$9.1895
$9.4598
$9.7301
$10.2706
$10.8112
Lifeguard
F
$8.5797
$8.8321
$9.0844
$9.5891
$10.0938
Water Safety Aid
F
$8.5797
$8.8321
$9.0844
$9.5891
$10.0938
Recreation Leader
F
$8.5797
$8.8321
$9.0844
$9.5891
$10.0938
Service Desk Attendant
F
$8.5797
$8.8321
$9.0844
$9.5891
$10.0938
Unused
E
$8.0476
$8.2843
$8.5210
$8.9944
$9.4678
Rink Attendant
C
$7.0356
$7.2425
$7.4495
$7.8633
$8.2772
Recreation Asst.
C
$7.0356
$7.2425
$7.4495
$7.8633
$8.2772
Aquatics Assistant
C
$7.0356
$7.2425
$7.4495
$7.8633
$8.2772
Amended 7/19/01
PARKS AND RECREATION
SHAKOPEE DEPARTMENT
.M= PFME S,«
01 61:111111 •
POSITION: SERVICE DESK ATTENDANT
Pay Grade F: $8.5797- 10.0938 per hour
10 -20 Hours /Week including evenings, weekends and holidays (varied
schedule). Non - exempt position.
OBJECTIVE:
This part -time position provides a wide variety of information to guests on the phone and in- person.
They operate a cash register, reconcile cash through cash procedures, process program registrations
and Community Center admissions and memberships, and clean tables /chairs in the lobby when
needed.
RELATIONSHIPS
Acts under the supervision of the Recreation and Facilities Director and /or Recreation Supervisor.
RESPONSIBILITIES:
1. Provide quality customer service and assistance to all individuals using the Shakopee
Community Center.
- Greet all patrons in friendly and courteous manner upon arrival and departure.
-Check in all recreation program participants and room rental customers.
- Register participants for recreation and collect fees, sell memberships and punch card
passes.
- Balance and receipt all revenues daily.
2. Enforcement of facility rules and regulations.
- Zero Tolerance Policy
- General Operations Policies
QUALIFICATIONS:
1. Strong oral and written communication with organizational skills required.
2. Experience working with people in a service oriented position.
3. Able to work independently, assessing situations and responding in a decisive and fair
manner.
Shakopee Parks and Recreation Department
1255 Fuller Street South
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Phone 952 - 233 -3830 — Fax 952 - 233 -3831
Pmtd PARKS AND RECREATIO
• ' E DEPARTMENT
C01YEvfl=PMESNCM1857
POSITION: BUILDING SUPERVISOR
Pay Grade H: $9.7993 — 11.5286 per hour
10 -20 Hours /Week including evenings, weekends and holidays (varied
schedule). Non - exempt position.
OBJECTIVE:
This part -time position is responsible for the coordinating the day -day activities in the Community
Center. This includes providing information to guests, enforcement of Community Center use policies,
on duty supervision of Community Center staff (service desk), overseeing room set -ups, following
safety & security procedures and general upkeep of the facility.
RELATIONSHIPS
Acts under the supervision of the Recreation and Facilities Director and /or Recreation Supervisor.
RESPONSIBILITIES:
1. Provide quality customer service and assistance to all individuals using the Shakopee
Community Center.
- Greet all patrons in friendly and courteous manner upon arrival and departure.
-Check in all recreation program participants and room rental customers.
- Register participants for recreation and collect fees, sell memberships and punch card
passes.
- Verify the balance and receipt of all revenues.
2. Oversee all areas of the Community Center to maintain an organized, clean and safe facility.
- Perform custodial duties as necessary in all rooms and notify appropriate personnel
when maintenance is required.
- Prepare rooms for programs and rentals as needed.
- Monitor all equipment to assure items are in good working condition.
- Responsible for unlocking and locking of building at appropriate time.
3. Enforcement of facility rules and regulations.
- Zero Tolerance Policy
- General Operations Policies
QUALIFICATIONS:
1. Minimum qualifications include one year of customer service experience and high school diploma
or equivalent.
2, Desired quaiifications include six months of supervisory and /or managerial experience, additional
customer service and supervisory experience, current CPR & First Aid certifications.
3. Must be 18 years or older.
Shakopee Parks and Recreation Department
1255 Fuller Street South
Shakopee Minnesota 55379
Phone 952 - 233 -3830 — Fax 952 - 233 -3831
Is - ., E O �,
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Sergeants Contract — 2001 Cost of Living Adjustment
DATE: July 18, 2001
nrm
The Council is asked to approve a cost of living adjustment for the Police Sergeants
bargaining unit for 2001.
The City is in the 1 st year of a two -year contract with the Police Sergeants bargaining
unit, represented by Local 279 Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. Since 1994, the
amount of salary increase as a cost of living adjustment has been determined by an...
"increase equal to the average percentage increase for the Stanton Group Six
Cities (10,000 —25,000 population). This would be based upon the average of
those contracts settled by July 1 of the year in question; any increase would be
retroactive to the beginning of the year."
As of July 1 there were seventeen cities whose first line Police supervisors had settled
contracts. In averaging those increases, the increase is 3.49 %.
Adjustments for employee wages were provided for in the 2001 operating budget. Note
that the Sergeants unit has increased from three members, to five members this year.
1 1 1,;
I recommend that the City Council approve the modification for the 2001 Pay Plan for
Police Sergeants by granting a 3.49% increase.
'' ` @ ' !,
If the Council concurs, it should, by motion, authorize the appropriate City officials to
execute modifications to Appendix A for the year 2001, for the Police Sergeants
Bargaining Unit of Law Enforcement Labor Services Local 279.
l k ' 9!
Mark McNeill
City Administrator
MM:tw
V
MONTHLY WAGES
2001
SERGEANTS
For 2001 and 2002, pay plan shall be adjusted by a cost of living increase equal to the
average percentage increase for Stanton Group Six Cities (10,000 - 25,000 population).
This would be based upon the average of those contracts settled by July 1 st of the year in
question; any increase would be retroactive to the beginning of that year. The anniversary
date for a future step increase will be June 1, and added to the pay plan in effect on
12/31/01:
Sergeants who were appointed to their positions on 8/19/98 shall be placed at Step 6
effective January 1, 2001; Step 7 on June 1, 2001; and Step 8 on June 1, 2002.
2000
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8
80% 85% 87.50% 90% 92.50% 95% 97.50% 100%
$3,884.98 $4,127.78 $4,249.19 $4,370.59 $4,492.00 $4,613.40 $4,734.81 $4,856.21
2001
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8
80% 85% 87.50% 90% 92.50% 95% 97.50% 100%
$4,020.55 $4,271.84 $4,397.48 $4,523.12 $4,648.76 $4,774.41 $4,900.05 $5,025.69
07/12/Z001
�a • •
STANTON GOUP V & Vi
cvMM u IR
STANTON GROUP V
1 Bloomington
2,5 Brklyn Park
1 Plymouth
2,7 Coon Rapids
Eagan
1 Burnsville
Minnetonka
1 Eden Prairie
1,5 Edina
5 Maple Grove
St Louis Park
1 Blaine
1 Apple Valley
1,2,3,8 Lakeville
1,2,5 Woodbury
1 Maplewood
1 Richfield
12 Rosevilte
1 Cottage Grove
1 Brooklyn Center
1,5 Fridley
3 Ivr Grove Hgts
1,2 White Bear Lk
1,6 Oakdale
AveragesforV ...
STANTON GROUP VI
1,2,9 Crystal
7 New Brighton
New Hope
Golden Valley
1,2,4 Champlin
1,2 West St Paul
1.7 Columbia Hgts
1 Anoka
1 Hastings
1,2,7 Hopkins
1,10 Savage
1 Shakopee
1 Chaska
Stillwater
Lino Lakes
1,2 Prior Lake
1 Robbinsdale
Mounds View
1,7 No St Paul
1,2 Rosemount
Average& for Vt.
67,476 $4,287 -00 $4,427.00
63,940 $4,030.75 $4,141.15
62,979 $4,392.00 54,524.00
61,904 $4,120.83 $4,294.25
60,073 S4.354.13 $4,484.13
58,705 $4,399.00 $4,531.00
52,691 $4,388.80 $4,511.87
50,681 $4,288.27 $4,395.73
47,235 $4,490.42 $4,625.17
47,164 $4,647.00 $4,795.50
44,244 $4,616.17 $4,664.17
44,852 $ -00 $4,336.00
43,468 $4,472.75 $4.606.92
38,506 $3,808 -13 S4,109.73
38,645 54,019.83 $4,140.50
35,355 $4,180.94 $4,306.37
34,261 S4,386.62 $4,541.25
34,306 $3,989.68 $4,109.00
30,630 $4,308.00 $4.437.00
28,535
28,525 $4,340.17 54.460.99
29,151 $4.271.00 $
26,485 $4,273.17 54,394.92
26,061 $4,220.57 $4,34720
14,282149 S4.425
$5,044.00
$4,660.90
$5,187.61
$4.933 -08
$5,099.47
$5,137.00
$5,059.58
55,103.69
$5,205.62
$5,465.88
55,465.88
$5,000.00
$5,185.00
$4,549.23
$5,030.33
$4,823.81
$5,111.21
$4,682.63
$4,995.36
54,982.00
$5,002.03
$5,026.24
$4,892.58
$4,874.93
55;025;75
6.68% $5,381.00
3.50% $4,824.03
3.00% 55,34317
4.00% 55.130.42
3.50% $5,278-00
3.99% S5,342.00
3.01% $5,212.08
3.52% $5,283.20
3.00% 55,361.79
3.00% S5,629.86
3.00% $5,629.86
3.50% $5,175.00
3.05% 55,34100
13.91 $5.296.05
3.00% $5,181.24
4 .03% 55,015.21
NS
2.00% $4,776.28
3.00% $5,145 -22
3.14% 55,138 -35
3.00% 55,152.14
NS
NS
3.48% $5,04476
3.82% $5223.13
23,677 $3.992.00 $4,112.00 $4,235.00 $4,362.00 $4,493.00 $4,628.00 3.00% $4.767.00
22,854 54,090.78 $4,193.05 S4, 339.91 $4,470.11 $4,550.26 $4,886.56 2.95% $5,032.13
21,610 $4,329.03 $4,454.67 $4,602.00 S4,740.00 $4,883 -00 $5,029.00 3 -50% $5,205.00
21,001 $4,491.00 $4.621.00 54,789.00 $4,933 -00 $5,106.00 35,259.00 4.04% $5.471-46
20, 385 $4223.85 S4, 346.34 $4. 32423 $4,458.28 $4,567.62 $4,725.25 3 -00% 54,867.01
19,521 $3, 921.42 $4,031.22 S4,153.07 $4,281.82 S4.418.64 $4,572 -53 3.50% $4,732.57
18,699 54,163.00 $4, 277.00 $4, 405.00 $4,537.00 $4,896.00 $4.860.00 3.50% S5,030.00
17,964 $4.309.00 $4,438.00 $4,571.00 $4.708.00 $4,849.00 S4,994A0 3.00% $5.144 -00
18,079 53,69T.00 $3,817.00 $3, 931.00 54,152.00 $4,380 -00 $4,626.00 3.24% 54,776.00
16 .887 $3,963.31 $4,102.81 $4,226.41 $4,353.20 $4,483.80 $4,66449 4.03% $4,852.46
17,040 $4,073.50 $4, 175.33 $4, 300.58 $4,429.58 $4,651.00 54,884.00 5.03% $5,129.75
16,043 34,150.00 $4,278.65 $4,404.87 $4,514.99 S4,676.18 $4,85621 RO
15,361 $4.035.39 $4,281.00 $4,431.00 $4,577.00 $4,761.00 4.03% $4,953.00
1 5,143 $4,700.00
NS
15,053
14,687 $4,117.00 54,117.00 $4,368 -00 84.508.00 $4,643.00 3.53% 54,807.00
14, 149 $4,213.22 $4, 339.52 $4, 469.81 $4,603.90 $4,742.02 $4,884.28 3.50% $5,055.23
12, 859 $4, 336.25 $4, 465.07 54,599.02 $4,736.99 $4,879.10 $5,025.48 3.00% $5,17624
12,801 S4.106.44 S4, 250.17 $4,377.68 54,509.01 $4,644 -28 $4,857.92 3.00% $5,003.66
13,146 $3, 903-67 S4,020.75 $ $4,317.50 S4,490.1T $4,658 -58 3. 21.67
54 118:76' b ¢;237.63 i 34:36% 45 . 54,43€.80 : $4:6601`3 $6,1323.07 . • 3.49' /s 73.87
$4,585.00
$4,265.35
$4,660.00
$4,430.67
54,619.33
$4,701.00
$4.638.40
$4,517.06
54,763.92
$4,898.17
$5,011,50
$4,488.00
54,745.13
$4,232.80
54.466.08
$4,457.75
S4,677.49
$4,224.00
$4,571.00
$4,577.92
$4,527.88
$4,526.83
$4,477.20
�4,58�195;
$4,723.00
$4,393.35
$4,800.00
54,590.08
$4,757.91
54,842.00
$4,773.60
$4,697.33
$4,906.84
$5.045.08
S5,152.12
$4,623.00
$4,887.48
$4,425.3.0
$4,663.63
$4,591.48
$4,817.81
S4,350.72
$4.708.00
54,715.25
$4,663.72
$4,662.63
$4,600.26
54,712.84
$4,878.00
$4,525.15
$4,944.00
$4,766.25
$4.888.75
$4,987.00
$4,912.27
54,908.80
$5,054.00
$5,306.68
$5,306.68
$4,808.00
$5,034.00
$4,535.83
$4,803.75
$4,683.31
$4,962.34
$4,481.24
$4,849.16
54,855.00
$4,856.34
$4,836.95
$4,837.50
54,733.73
54,8144.7$
AVERAGES V $ .VI S4,2iz 90 S4 345:49' : $4, $4,6 17.06 $4,773. I0 $4,938 3.73% SS ,i 07.94
Pop und
Populations as fo in the League of Minnesota Cities 2000 Directory of Minnesota City Officials
1 Eligible for overtime pay
2 Eligible for longevity pay
3 Iver Gry Hgts & Lakeville: Longevity built into wages.
4 Champlin: New base rates established due to Longevity effective 111197.
5 Non -Union
6 Moved to Group V as of 111100
7 Eligible for Deferred Comp.
8 Lakeville- 711102 - $5509.21
9 Crystal 7/1/02 - $4934
10 Savage: 7/1102 - $5388.25
NS Not Settled
RO Re- Opener
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Shako - Valley Amateur Hockey Assn. Gambling License
DATE: July 18, 2001
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
f
C 0 1 1 „x '"us N T
The Shako - Valley Amateur Hockey Association is making application to obtain a premises
permit in order to sell pull tabs at Saba's Sports Bar, 911 East 1st Avenue.
The permit will ultimately be issued by the State Gambling Control Board. When application is
made, the Board requires that the local unit of government pass a resolution specifically
approving or denying the application.
VFW Post #4046 has discontinued their gambling activities at this site.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Offer Resolution No. 5562, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Approving
Premises Permit for Shako - Valley Amateur Hockey Association, and move its adoption.
,E
A.t.�. � 1” '
Judith Cox, City� Clerk
JSC /j s
RESOLUTION NO. 5562
• • 1'
WHEREAS, the 1990 legislature adopted a law which requires municipal approval in
order for the Gambling Control Board to issue or renew premises permits; and
WHEREAS, the Shako - Valley Amateur Hockey Association is seeking a Premises
Permit for the site at Saba's Sports Bar, 911 East 1St Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS:
That the Premises Permit for the Shako - Valley Amateur Hockey Association at Saba's
Sports Bar, 911 East 1 St Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota, be approved.
Adopted in adjourned regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this 24 day of July, 2001.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
IS F,
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: 2001/02 Insurance Renewals
DATE: July 18, 2001
Introduction
Council is requested to approve of the renewal of property and
liability insurance coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities.
Background
Attached is a list of property /liability insurance premiums for
the renewal of the present coverage with the League of Minnesota
Cities insurance Trust (LMCIT). The policy period is August 1,
2001 to July 31, 2002.
Basic Policy
The policies proposed are basically the same as current coverage.
The premiums are slightly larger than last year but more items
and value are covered. The total deposit premium has increased
from $214,974 to $222,695 covering the City, SPUC and EDA.
All of the coverages are from the League of Minnesota Cities
Insurance Trust.
There is more detail available on the policy for any Council
member that desires it.
Optional Coverage
Quotations were not requested for the following coverages (same as
last year) :
Flood
Earthquake
Garage keepers
PIP (auto coverage)
Volunteer accident
Asbestos removal liability
$200,000)
Open meeting law defense
Joint Powers contracts
(in excess of basic coverage of
Fire works
Utility poles and lines - SPUC
Independent Administrative Boards
Umbrella Policy
Sewer backup - $1,000 no fault coverage
Premise medical - no fault coverage
Business interruption - SPUC
Extraordinary expense (loan for disasters)
The city budget contains $167,300 for insurance (not counting
employee group or work comp. insurance) and deductibles across
all funds, excluding SPUC. SPUC shares in the cost of the
insurance and their share for this year has not been determined
yet, last year it was $75,000.
One of the items for the renewal of the property /liability
insurance is to decide whether or not to waive the monetary limits
on municipal tort liability. Last year Council decided not to
waive the limits. Council in the past has not waived the monetary
limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04.
The current limit is $1,000,000.
Action Requested
Move to accept the property /liability insurance renewals from the
League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust with a deposit premium
of $222,695 and not waive the monetary limits on tort liability
established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04.
Gregg Voxland
Finance Director
I- \finance \dots \insure \pzp1ia01
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
-7-
*Premiums at Inception of Policy & Does Not Include Interim
Endorsements or Updates
2000 -2001
2001 -2002
PROPERTY
$ 33,271
$ 39,358
INLAND MARINE
$ 4,019
$ 4,580
CRIME
$ 989
$ 1,135
MUNICIPAL LIABILITY
$122,347
$118,240
ERRORS & OMISSIONS
INCLUDED
INCLUDED
AUTOMOBILE
$ 50,443
$ 55,219
BOILER & MACHINERY
$ 3,905
$ 4,163
TOTAL PREMUIM
$214,974
$222,695
*Premiums at Inception of Policy & Does Not Include Interim
Endorsements or Updates
f` f
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Meeting Dates — Budget, CIP
DATE: July 18, 2001
1► '•1 •
The Council is asked to consider some changes in dates previously established for City
Council workshops.
NO DIP,
Budget - At the meeting of July 10 the Council established budget workshop dates for
August 16 22 23 and September 1 l However, since that time, the Mayor has
been notified of a work conflict that he needs to accommodate. We are suggesting
instead Monday, August 13 Tuesday, August 14 and Thursday, August 16 as a
substitute for the previous dates. Thursday, September 6 and Tuesday, September 11
should be held in reserve.
Finance Director Gregg Voxland indicates that it is unlikely that we will have necessary
information from the State and County to finalize a budget by August 16 Therefore,
the Council should plan on meeting in September, probably on September 6th.
Workshop Meeting — Rod Kelsey, of Riley, Dettmann & Kelsey has indicated that he
would like 45 minutes to an hour to meet with the City Council to review the preliminary
results of his pay plan study. Knowing the Council's other meeting obligations, and also
looking at an hour being a short workshop by itself, the Council is asked to consider
commencing a meeting at 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 26 in advance of the previously
scheduled CIP meeting, which begins at 5:00 p.m.
• • 0
The Council should indicate whether a 4:00 p.m. start on July 26 for a pay plan
discussion, and budget meeting dates of August 13 14 16 and September 6 and
11 are acceptable
Mark McNeill
City Administrator
MM:th
a�
Z
,~-)
r4
00
m
N
N
C
d
r
Lo
(O
N
to
E
U1
N
� H1 �oHN
VI NO�tDN O
M
O
c
ca
•L
LL. MO�NM
LL.
O rINM
N
m
J
Q ntNN..
N
ON
�
O
O
N
O
�e
U
=
An
E
m
E N
�.
E
v
c n
O
U
m
m
O
m
U Y
c
c
o
co
a
E
o.
E
E
0
on
IR
0
ri
in
�
O
O
O
V)
— E
M
`° E
m
E
Qj U
E
V
c O
c
2 V)
v
w¢
Q
a
C)
0
M
O
ry
O
m
m
C
C
N
O)
N
N
7
m
C
-0 O N
p
0
L
=3
O
U
U
n U
O O
�+
u
a 3r w
U
a E
E
E E
O
O
O o
O M
°o
Ln t0
I�
�O
ON
N
m
N
IN
�+
N
m
Cl
m
J+
'O p
N
aU'
'�
Ln
U
CL Y
O
g
O O
a
`°
a
cn
E
E
E
E
CL
0
C)
0
IR
0
°
Ln
L
L
a�
Z
n
L
2
O
L
N ��
N
�
>
g> M �v ^ i Nfn
O
N
N
N
T
N N
LL.
N
In�01N
E �
v
v v ° i H a�
t0:
M
~
N
N
N N C
ON
O
O. N
•O O
Ln
pp O
E
N NO�tpNO.
d E
E
T
u a U
O
U
0 0 cn
CD
�
U Y
O
m
U CL
Q-
E E
E
CL CL
° o ° o
Q
CD
0
Ln r"
LO
ON
ID
N
O
E
01 n
m E
E
Ln
U
E�
0
c
U
O v)
v U
w
0
0 0
O M
O
Ln kD
n
co
01
I
N N
01
N
7 N
N
,.
aj
V
V
V
�
(J
U
U w
U
CD
o 0
0
C)
O M
O
L M
Ln LO
r,
01
t-0 fN
E
AS Ik
t
'0
• V
,
N
_C
2
(O
Y
a
� U
L
E
a
AV A
• m
0
n
• Q
0
00
ljj
I�
n
L
2
O
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Application for Tobacco License
Twin Cities Avanti Stores, LLC
DATE: July 20, 2001
INTRODUCTION:
CONSENT
City Council is asked to consider an application for a tobacco
license for Twin Cities Avanti Stores, LLC.
BACKGROUND:
Application has been made by Scott Stevens, Twin Cities Avanti
Stores, LLC, to sell tobacco at retail at 234 West 1 Avenue.
Twin Cities Avanti Stores, LLC is purchasing Food n Fuel from
Avanti Holdings, Inc.
For training purposes, Twin Cities Avanti Stores, LLC have advised
that they plan on using the training materials provided by the
City from Minnesota ASSIST, Minnesota Department of Health and the
American Cancer Society.
The Police Department has conducted the customary background check
and has learned of nothing that would prevent the issuance of a
tobacco license.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Move to approve the application and grant a tobacco license to
Twin Cities Avanti Stores, LLC dba Food n Fuel, 234 West 1St
Avenue, effective July 25, 2001 through December 31, 2001, upon
the surrender of the license to Avanti Holdings, Inc.
is \clerk \jeanette \licenses \avanti
i 1 ;�
July 24, 2001
Mayor Jon Brekke
Dear Mayor Jon Brekke:
SUBJECT: RESIGNATION
I am submitting resignation from Shakopee City Council effective
I am getting married in the spring of 2002 and will be moving to Edina_ I am submitting my
resignation now to allow the citizens of Shakopee to choose my replacement through election this
fall_
I have enjoyed my time serving the citizens of Shakopee and will always keep an eye on Shakopee as
it grows.
Sincerely,
Gary orke
cc: City Council: Robert Sweeney, Deb Amundson, Cletus Link
City Administrator: Mark McNeill
City Clerk: Judy Cox
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Womnrnnd -y'r w
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Closed Session —July 24, 2001
DATE: July 20, 2001
Following the regular portion of the July 24 City Council meeting, the Council will be
asked to go to closed session to discuss condemnation proceedings.
Mark McNeill
City Administrator
I►�1 Iii i1