Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
September 04, 2001
TENTATIVE AGENDA CITY OF SHAKOPEE REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 LOCATION: 129 Holmes Street South Mayor Jon Brekke presiding 1] Roll Call at 7:00 p.m. 2] Pledge of Allegiance 3] Approval of Agenda 4] Mayor's Report 5] Approval of Consent Business — (All items noted by an * are anticipated to be routine. After a discussion by the Mayor, there will be an opportunity for members of the City Council to remove items from the consent agenda for individual discussion. Those items removed will be considered in their normal sequence on the agenda. Those items remaining on the consent agenda will otherwise not be individually discussed and will be enacted in one motion.) 6] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS (Limited to five minutes per person/subject. Longer presentations must be scheduled through the City Clerk. As this meeting is cablecast, speakers must approach the microphone at the podium for the benefit of viewers and other attendees.) *7] Approval of Minutes: July 26 and July 31, 2001 *8] Approval of Bills in the Amount of $217,534.82 plus $77,721.40 for refunds, returns and pass through for a total of $295,256.22 9] Public Hearing=: None 10] Communications 11] Liaison Reports from Council Members 12] Recess for Economic Development Authority Meeting 13 ] Re- convene 14] Recommendations from Boards and Commissions: TENTATIVE AGENDA September 4, 2001 Page —2- 151 General Business A] Public Works and Engineering 1. Recognizing the Public Works Department for work on the Community Youth Building and on the Skate Park — Res. No. 5578 2. Letter of Credit Analysis for Private Developments 3. 2001 Traffic Studies for Various Areas in the City of Shakopee 4. Parking Restrictions for Snow Removal B] Police and Fire *1. 2001 -2002 D.A.R.E. Educational Services Agreement *2. Amendment to Fire Relief Association By -laws — Res. No. 5571 C] Parks and Recreation D] Community Development * 1. Vacation of 4` Avenue between Cass and Webster Streets — Res. No. 5569 *2. Final Plat for Providence Pointe I" Addition (formerly Heritage Square), located north and south of a westerly extension of 17` Avenue to CSAH 79 — Res. 5579 3. Contract for Planning Consultant Services E] Personnel *1. Employee Termination F] General Administration * 1. Shakopee Rotary Club Premises Permit for the Sale of Pull -tabs — Res. 5576 *2. On Sale Intoxicating Liquor License — Great Lakes, Inc. — tabled 8/21 *3. Copier Purchase for Administration Department 4. City Hall/Police Property Acquisition 5. 2001 EDA Tax Levy and Budget — Res. No. 5574 `6. Setting Proposed Maximum 2001 Tax Levy, Collectable in 2002 — Res. 5575 7. Canceling Debt Service Levies for 2001/2002 — Res. No. 5577 8. Workshop Meeting 9. Garbage Exemption — Christopher Henderson 16] Council Concerns 17] Other Business 18] Adjourn to Monday, September 10, 2001, at 5:00 p.m. wag ADJ. REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 0 I sl Mayor Brekke called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. with Council Members Link, Morke, and Sweeney, and Amundson present_ Also present: Mark McNeill, City Administrator; Bruce Loney, Public Works Director /City Engineer; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; R Michael Leek, Community Development Director; Gregg Voxland, Finance Director, Tracy Coenen, Management Assistant; Dan Hughes, Chief of Police, Jason Bullard, Assistant Finance Director and Mark McQuillan, Natural Resources Director. Members of the Planning Commission present were: Terry Joos, Mary Romansky, Larry Meilleur, and Mark Houser_ Members of the Park and Recreation Advisory Board present were: John Collins, Jeff Kaley and Kathy Gerlach. The Agenda was approved as presented. This meeting was to begin the discussion for the 5 year CIP review. This was a joint meeting with the City Council, Planning Commission and the Park and Recreation Advisory Board. Mr_ McNeill stated that the CIP is a planning document as well as a financial document_ He stated that the two major questions to be discussed tonight are the Building Fund and the Park Reserve Fund. The City had anticipated having four (4) major buildings constructed over the next five years without the use of a referendum. The construction of the four buildings was dependent on development fees. The construction schedule in place now is a very aggressive schedule for building and with the slowdown in the economy and capturing of development fees, the City building plan should be adjusted. The Library, Police Station, an addition to the Public Works building and a replacement for City Hall are the four building projects needed within the next five years. A more conservative approach was being suggested now for the building construction of the City's facilities. Mr. McNeill presented a graphic showing the dollar amounts now anticipated by the City in each year for the next five years. There were some large maintenance items that the City was in the process of going out for bids on now. The new Library and the new Police Station needed to be discussed and some decisions needed to be made on the construction of these facilities. In an effort to save some money, he explained that the Council has decided that the new Police Station and the new City Hall would be consolidated rather than building the new City Hall on 2` Ave. The City had been specifically setting aside funds for the new Library for six years and many Council members felt these funds should still be used for a new library. There was discussion on the prices for the construction of all buildings escalating each time their construction is looked at. Mayor Brekke agreed that the funds that were earmarked for Library use should be used for the new Library. It was felt that the new Library project should move forward. Mayor Brekke asked if a case could be made for the Police Station being a referendum item. Public safety was the most important directive of the City Council. All the buildings the City is projecting constructing are critical. There is a need for the buildings but the money is not there without touching taxes. Cncl. Sweeney stated he would be more comfortable pulling funds from other funds for the Police Station. Cncl. Sweeney suggested a transfer be made from the Sewer Fund to the Building Fund making possible the complete unds needed construction of the new Police facility with the City remembering that these borrowed f Official Proceedings of the July 26, 2001 Shakopee City Council Page —2- to be paid back to the Sewer Fund. Cncl. Sweeney had no problem going to referendum on some items but as far as the needed buildings were concerned, these buildings were not referenda material. These buildings had to be done. Cncl. Sweeney wanted to concentrate on how the City could fund a new Library in 2002 and new Police Station in 2003. Cncl. Sweeney felt the money could be transferred from the Sewer Fund to the Building Fund. Some of the other projects really needed to be Iooked at. Does the project need to be done immediately or could the project possibly wait. Mayor Brekke polled the Council. Should the new Library move ahead for Spring 2002 construction? It was decided 4 —1 that the new library should move ahead. The new Police Station will be constructed in 2003 with some borrowing to occur from the Sanitary Sewer Fund or other internal fund. Mr. McNeill volunteered to provide a report of the Sanitary Sewer Fund so the Council could make a decision on whether the new Library and the new Police Station should occur simultaneously to provide a cost savings. There was discussion on the timing of park dedication payments. Mr. Loney, Public Works Director /City Engineer, reported briefly on the sanitary sewer, storm drainage and street projects he identified for the CIP. Some of the projects would be contingent on redevelopment plans. Mr. Loney reported on the River District Trunk Sewer. This area is seeing problems this year. This year the City has experienced significant inflow /infiltration into the sewer system_ The payment to the Metropolitan Council for treatment of this problem is no longer reimbursable from FEMA. Therefore, it is felt by staff that the improvements made to the River District Trunk Sewer would be cost effective. Because the Townships can't be assessed by the City of Shakopee, the Council was reluctant to purchase Trunk Storm Sewer Easements on the Townships property. Blue Lake Drainage easements may need to be purchased_ An agreement with the PLSLWD is being worked on to upgrade the channel so ultimate flow can be handled for Prior Lake, Prior Lake Watershed and the City of Shakopee. The improvement to the channel can be done over time and is dependent on development fees_ Mr. Loney presented some street projects, sidewalk projects and bike trails, he identified for the CIP. Some streets needed signalization but the signalization could be assessed to the commercial properties in the area_ Some of the street projects are developer driven. Cncl. Sweeney wondered if at some point a downtown improvement special district could be established where assessments could be spread around the benefited properties. There was discussion on some of the street improvements. Pedestrian bridges along with reconstruction of some streets were discussed. Cncl. Sweeney felt what projects could be put on hold for 2002 and perhaps 2003 should be but on hold because these would be the crunch years money wise_ Cncl. Morke wanted to see split phasing lights at CR 17 and 10` Avenue and CR 17 and 4` Avenue very soon. He wanted the County encouraged to move on this project. Mark McQuillan reported on the possible land acquisition (43 acres) on the east side of O'Dowd Lake. There were residents at the Park and Recreation Advisory Board meeting that expressed their Official Proceedings of the July 26, 2001 Shakopee City Council Page —3- disapproval of the possible land purchase at O'Dowd Lake. The Park and Recreation Advisory Board has gone on record stating that the O'Dowd land purchase does meet the City's Comprehensive Park Plan objectives in terms of acreage and location, but the Park and Recreation Advisory Board does wish to determine the viability of acquiring the property without jeopardizing the current park projects. The cost of the land was a concern to the Park and Recreation Advisory Board. The Park and Recreation Advisory Board would like the opportunity to view the property before a recommendation is made. The subject site was identified by Mr. McQuillan. It was figured that the land out at O'Dowd Lake would cost considerable money to improve. Mr_ McQuillan did state that the public who attended the Park and Recreation Advisory Board meeting where concerned about the process of the possible purchase of the land by Lake O'Dowd. The general public would like to give public input. The City Council decided to wait for an appraisal on this item before there was more discussion_ Jeff Kaley, Park and Recreation Advisory Board, stated the Park and Recreation Advisory Board was in favor of this proposed new park area by Lake O'Dowd but only to purchase the land at this time, and do the park improvements several years down the road_ For all of the park projects to be successful, it was thought some of the tax levy would need to be earmarked for parkland. Park dedication fees would not be enough. There was some upgrading of playground equipment in the CIP for 2002. Mr. McQuillan would like to continue the relationship with Minnesota Tree Trust Program in doing some landscaping in the small park, owned by the City now, around O'Dowd Lake. Mr. McQuillan explained other park projects that he would like to see done in the next few years. The Southbridge Master Park Plan along with other park projects will need to be reviewed each year. Cncl. Morke was concerned about the priority of some park areas. Mayor Brekke would like to see some projections that show a direct levy contribution to the Park Reserve Fund and the impact the direct levy would have on the budget. Brekke/Link moved to adjourn the meeting to Tuesday, July 31, 2001 at 5 :00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 7:00 p-m. 9 L aith S. Cox City Clerk Carole Hedlund Recording Secretary ADJ. REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JULY 31, 20% Mayor Brekke called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. with Council Members Link, Morke, and Sweeney present. Council Member Amundson was absent. Also present: Mark McNeill, City Administrator; Bruce Loney, Public Works Director /City Engineer; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director; Tracy Coenen, Management Assistant, and Mark McQuillan, Natural Resources Director. Members of the Jackson Town Board present were: Gerry Mareck and Don Hedlund, and Rose Menke, Township Clerk. Item D was removed from the agenda. The Agenda was approved as amended. Mayor Brekke explained that Item D was to be a discussion between the City of Shakopee and the Jackson Town Board on an orderly annexation agreement between the two entities. The focus of the annexation was to be on the undeveloped areas of Jackson Township. In a past meeting it was apparently stated that future meetings between the City of Shakopee and the Jackson Town Board would be held a neutral site. This meeting was therefore deferred to a future date where both parties could be comfortable with the setting and the Agenda. It was felt that full representation of both parties needed to be present to effectively conduct a meeting. It was noted that the purpose of the workshop meetings was to focus on the land use, extension of sewer and water and focus on the undeveloped areas of the Township. If there were impacts on the developed areas, then Jackson Township would hold meetings and have public hearings to discuss the issue before any decisions were made_ Mayor Brekke stated there would be no annexation of developed areas within Jackson Township in the near future. Mr. McNeill, City Administrator, presented the cleaning services for City buildings that the City of Shakopee currently has, and the desire of the City of Shakopee to hire a new cleaning service. Sweeney/Morke moved to authorize staff to explore RFP's for a new cleaning service for City facilities. Motion carried unanimously. A member of the audience wanted to hear some input (feelings, plans) on the annexation process_ Mayor Brekke stated that there needed to be discussion with the Jackson Town Board Officials. In light of the new County Comprehensive Plan there is a need to have this discussion about the land use issues and the extension of the sewer and water. There really is no official position that the City of Shakopee has or that the Jackson Town Board has. The focus is on the undeveloped areas. Cncl. Sweeney pointed out that the only way the City can extend sewer and water to any township area is if the area is annexed. Sewer and water extensions can only be assessed to areas within the City of Shakopee, therefore these areas will need to be annexed by the City of Shakopee or a town of Jackson will need to be created and that town will need to get into the sewer and water business. As of now Jackson Township has no right -of -way to the Blue Lake Storm Water Drainage Channel. A goal of the annexation discussions is to discuss the Urban Reserve areas located on the County Comprehensive Plan and the extension of sewer and water to these areas. Official Proceedings of the July 31, 2001 Shakopee City Council Page —2- The Urban Reserve area is basically undeveloped farmland today with expectations that the School District will be developing some of this undeveloped area in the near future. There is no urgency to discuss the developed areas. Cncl. Link asked about the annexation process. Mayor Brekke noted that there are a variety of processes that could be looked at. If a landowner is adjacent to the City, the landowner can petition the City of Shakopee for annexation. The Township can say Yes or No and the process goes on. Gerry Mareck helped to clarify a few issues. He stated that he did not think anyone in the audience in Council Chambers was interested in the process and the ways to carry out the process at this time. The only interest from the Jackson Town Board in annexation was brought forward several months earlier because they saw a future need for an orderly annexation for if and when there are properties interested in annexation. The orderly annexation agreement states only the things that are to be done if and when properties are annexed to the City. Other than for this need there is not much interest in annexation. There is interest in talking about an orderly annexation agreement because the Jackson Town Board would like to now what is coming so they can prepare. Sweeney/Link moved to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 5:15 p.m. ith S. Cox City Clerk Carole Hedlund Recording Secretary coA3 212- ?1T CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance director RE: City Bill List DATE: August 30, 2001 Introduction and Background Attached is a print out showing the division budget status for 2001 based on data entered as of 8/30/2001. Attached is a regular council bill list for invoices processed to date for council approval. Also included in the checklist are various refunds, returns, pass through, etc. totaling $77,721.40. The actual net expense amount is $217,534.82. Action Requested Move to approve the bills in the amount of $295,256.22. 0 (n r N O Cf) O O M M O m a m �N � M c a c m Q [D T c O N N F c n ❑ O T O � U U` a O m O m 0) a t n W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n O CO M o n M (D CO n n CO O n M CD M (n CD V to N N_ N_ O_ O (D N O (D M N M R (D Co Cl) n N M n N M co N V n n M M M n M O V N CO M (O N M n CO O M r CO O N r 0 C) O co 0 M 0 U z ❑ C7 J � z w U ME z v 0 O 2 Z a z w J !qq~� � U z Z Z j � O � m U Z W C, Z m O Q w Q z r O w O K z Q< g U W O Q O Z J W U w ? w z d Y _j W Q� z O Wp of Cl) a Z o Q Z 0 0 0 U U u. J C U U` (L ti z W (4 cn d Z) o O r r r CD f7 N M N V O O r 0 n n N N tD CO > o Q M M n n d M M W U' � C 'C p V V c m m (p Cl) co ca (I1 (n In V V (O (O C) 0 CD ❑ � M M N N } m � co') co 00 L U q c n n O M C � m co L) U O 0 0 (D M n c m to 3 M c a c � Q [� c O a v O 0 0 0 c M co F Z w 2 IL O J W W O F F z O ° U ° r O O v c M M > o Q I O M t] x o W i i OR 0 m M M mI v a cc co O O C C co co � � O N N ❑ C F � } m W W ,c O O c M M O lII C � d QO 3 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V Cl) Cl) f0 m N N � tT c a c � Q CD co M O CD M n N N V n M M n M O M O Z) � n O w - r 7 CD (-- O tO 0 7 Co 7 M V' cc o (n V M - 7 M V V' M V n 7 Q n V V n M N CO cD M N r M n O n O 7 n CO (O M N co V M CO D) Cn co co d C CO tO co co R CO (D tO (D Cn LO c0 tO N CO W co v N v o co cq n n m M m tD (D m i o n m n n CO N M O O c0 N O n CV N n V r l O r M O O r O 07 (D n M N 7 (O O V V M V (D N n O M N O M V (O (D O O O M N LL7 tO M to M Cc) c Cp lO O N r O N 7 O M r co M M N n M m tO C M N N � m N o co CO M M co M co N M R CO O co c cc (O N n C M n r co r M O M M M N m M n M M V N (O a V O n " N t() N co d W E cD N c) O tD CO co O co CO r r n r M V n M c N cc V M 7 M n N O M M 'R W O V O O O M M M O M lt] n N M (O n N U ❑ V n M W N ` r M V CO CO M C.O 0 O � N r co N N CA V M M (O r M N M M } m r M Q 1 = = O r (A D O LL 0 F P- _ _ (O CD n 7 (O N O M N U C N CO CO cq O (O N O M O M (O M m D_ L M M N N M R (D N M " w co M n o N O CO r V n 7 n co (D o M M cO M N co X w C p CD LO O M N CO CA O N v r N r CO r R O <{ M M CO r V O n (O M O O c f6 R U) 7 V N N tO (O M N V N N M c d Q 3 U m �N � M c a c m Q [D T c O N N F c n ❑ O T O � U U` a O m O m 0) a t n W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n O CO M o n M (D CO n n CO O n M CD M (n CD V to N N_ N_ O_ O (D N O (D M N M R (D Co Cl) n N M n N M co N V n n M M M n M O V N CO M (O N M n CO O M r CO O N r 0 C) O co 0 M 0 U z ❑ C7 J � z w U ME z v 0 O 2 Z a z w J !qq~� � U z Z Z j � O � m U Z W C, Z m O Q w Q z r O w O K z Q< g U W O Q O Z J W U w ? w z d Y _j W Q� z O Wp of Cl) a Z o Q Z 0 0 0 U U u. J C U U` (L ti z W (4 cn d Z) o O r r r CD f7 N M N V O O r 0 n n N N tD CO > o Q M M n n d M M W U' � C 'C p V V c m m (p Cl) co ca (I1 (n In V V (O (O C) 0 CD ❑ � M M N N } m � co') co 00 L U q c n n O M C � m co L) U O 0 0 (D M n c m to 3 M c a c � Q [� c O a v O 0 0 0 c M co F Z w 2 IL O J W W O F F z O ° U ° r O O v c M M > o Q I O M t] x o W i i OR 0 m M M mI v a cc co O O C C co co � � O N N ❑ C F � } m W W ,c O O c M M O lII C � d QO 3 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V Cl) Cl) f0 m N N � tT c a c � Q CD co z ❑ O U- K D Z 0 O ~ Y Q w w Y U W Z) � n O V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V O W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W C ( 0 CA N V V V V V V V V j V O O m m O O m m m m M m m m LT M m M � CT A A A A A A A A N N O CD W V m Ol A W N O CO m V m CT A W N O CO W V m m A W N O CO W V m CM A W N x N V N N D W A m s 11 m s m A m O CT -i N W O W OD j m O A m W 3 V N N 4 N A A V Cn m W N m -t V A N W cn m A N CO N N m O V W O O N N Ol m _ Ot (T CT CO CT N M M N OJ W O O N m A m CT W A m m o 9V O O O m V O GO N V W O O C l 0 O m O O O O O O O O O m O N o O O O O Ja O O J (O A o m dD O O OD CO CT A N O O tJ T O W V O O O O O O O O m A O O O m co O O O O CT O O m CT V O W Cl A m O N N m m m m v v A 0 0 0 O O O O 0 w w w w w w w w w - w w w w D D D D D D D D N O w K m< D D m c 1> 0 O 0 0 m D D Q , c-< 0 O C -n CCD o n c° ¢O ={ m- D n� r D o z c D 0� I n D� w U z z i - < v r D 0 0 m m m w r 1 r O O m s:o r < z 0 m X D x x O O..rD x M: X- Z.. z._ 0 0 a0.. x cn z O D z�� D ca m m m m O o x D m z v z c r m O Z.. D r - � . - {I. � ? c O O n z z - i - O v O m m m �° Z M , - 0 0 m D x z D j m 0 m z O m m 0 - D O 1 n O C - i N ?t m Q , O D � z z m v Ox ;o v D z 0 m 0 x v m � m Z 0 _< y m O x K K v m x n 0 CD in O m m r- rn rn - O c < w Q. z O D m 0 3 < O m i co x z - O i D O O z °< X D < O O = z m m O p m w m c p CO C n O n co ; x m fn - n x 0{ 0 w n O g O O m w m - K 0 n n O O m O O m m m K K O m A C7 0- 0 0 n m m A D n m c c - n Z z - D - i O O C r D D - D i P Z 0 T 2 m Z Z C C c c m m m m c O O m r == Z D C C Z o x m D x x D M M X x x K z M A x m x m A D x x i n m m� z z n m m r A z z O z r m x C 0 m m z z n D z z Z z A z Z m C Z m m G7 0 _i O z z CA m m -i 'm -i m G7 n O m r n n -i -i r m -i [7 m n - i n m fA C -i � 0 m m D_ - D_ fn m co� m fA (n D m oC m C y m C z Ian 'o m rn v 0 0 -DG { z -- z --i -DG O h m � O O z �� v z -Dt > v O m --i n0 W m r m w C r- 0 0 m w m m m z D co O co =i O O m =1 m m m D w m O D O M co m �' m m z o z m m r- m r z z m m r- m D D m y m D D D m m D rn D z z z z z z z O O G) O 17 O O m x 0 x m x v v w m m m m v M m m v m 3 D z v z m m z O w 0 -n m m m m w r -o m M D w w m m to m 0 0 - i w w z r O z - ' w O w D w O 0;10 x 0 m x -i A 0 v O 55 m O O D O v N m m z m m m o r O r- m m A - m n z m m o m O m o m rn m m m m j rn m m O r m 5 0 m A m O m m O m M 0 0 m d m 0 - O K O X -m i O K O D D n D D o O D z m or m N - �_ `2 > D D :E ::E m o K m `2 D `2 ip n D z z r D r- z D z 0 0 3 r - ;a Z C o m O C O D D D C C z c z D D C D C p T Z D Z Z C D r C C D Z D�y z r z D a z z z z z z m m -420 z z 0 D z� z m z c r� m m m m z m m v o m m m x D ° z O z z m m m v v K m G m K m° z z m m z m 3 m A m� m z m m m z z Z D m m z z r z o - z i - zi o z - z i z i 'i Z O Z x x X i m m m r r m m Uzi m m m m -i -i z z z Z D D D -4 O O O m m m K K R: m m m z z z --i -1 -i m 0 w 0 0 Z7 (7 m m O r O O N N O O O Q O 0 c O O m I" in n 2 � D CD O m m N m m m m � m W 0 0 0 W � 0 V-4 0 0 � V � 0 0 0 V V V V V V 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V V v V V V V V V-4 V V-4 V -4 -4 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V-4 V -4 -4 � V V � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W W W W W W W -4 0= W O A N A A N A N j A j j A A A A p A A A A A W W W W W W W O O O O O O O O O O tD W- tD W CD CD' N W CD co O W W O W N O CD W V O m O A W W N 0 ;c in C W N O W W V m W A W N O W W V W (n A W N O W W V W (n A W n m m G) r- 0 G) N N co W A �_ A N W O V N CO O A O --' W co W N Cn tD W W V A N A O W W W V W O W W V W V _ V p W V W V V W CD W N D p O O G .. Q A (n O O W W O O A O Ul O O W O A O tD O IV Cn O p m co N W CO N O CD A W W to W N Cn W W W W CD N A O Cn W O O V W co O O N O O IJ O CO <D p A O m V W V W W A N O V IJ A O O W Cn O O O W W .�.. O O O O O CD W W O O W A W O O O W O O V A O O O A O O O O A W O W 3 K 3 g K r r D c 0 T. T. ;r, T. ;r, T. -. _ Z ' . Z n S S S O t m m m m m ai' m Z O m- D D --I G) G) Q O Q G) - n - n � O. O m m� -n O m I m .. O z z z m m m m Q Z o o r r m. < r m m : m Z: D c 0 0 w Z O 0 z m)> A - o z z m N m 0 Q.Q r m m m m r m O m v m c) z rn D m= O o M Z m .n t v:m m o m °- Z� D 1 < 2 Z v Z° m [` z Z m 0 r m Q m x. _ T . -- m m z - Q ZZ-I Z- A -4 X �. � { z 0 --4 r- S m m T D m �O m '< C f Z m D x O � �'1 S r r "- . <- n {' �' c c O m �' to z n RD- co m m O D r- Z m Z. m z O D p 5 D m - m ;u 55 X C / 7 - m i D 2 -t Z U) m O D m Z C > T O - C S x y m D D Z m O Z { Q- m G) y 0 (A CO m m D K r m w '2 � m o .D co . n c x Q 0 S O w z 0 Z G N -1 O T m -< O m � Q �' 2 � -1 _ Z - I - U) � Z D O c D m -n Z to O 0 0 0 z C) p co z G) G) �_ D CO > y S p j O S m Z Z .G O Z z 0 0 CO T Z Z p O O O n Q Q i m G) n Q T O m 0 0 0 - A j m 0 -C O O m 0 0 0 D O� O m m 0 O T v Q O�� m� to � T� O M m 3 D O Z Z O m 2 c 0 0 Z Z .T D c Z c p cc S 0= -- t z c i F m z m z t � O mii O m a ni o_ m 0 n m w A v O 00 T (q T m Q T T o m m < n -D T -� A m m x m m m T -- t m o T 1 O A v Q - D S x A s Z z x �" m m S y D z C p �' O z ... ,ii m m m Z O m m rit m m m D m z X� _{ D m D m m D n O m z n i Z D G) Cl) 1 G) z z m o c z T O z z z w c z Z m z� m -< z - r z 0 T O G) O K m O T v G) > D m c7 A Q y 0 0 T m O G T m m O < ? n 0 c m w< z> cn z m CO C m r co (�!� m co cA m N D c = m D z D -qZ-I m (/� y C - Z I " - Z I 4� o 3 S co S S x Co m -t x W CA D -1 D S D T z T In c W O O O O z m 0 m m O =a O m z m m '- O m m a O m D m m Q w cn G) m v, m m N m `� 0 S Z S D o - O D D D m D_ D -i T Z Z Z Z Z Z Z c 2 Z G) Z G) Z Z G) G) Z G) Z Z G) G7 t x D m O 0 O T T O O Z m O T ;it O< O m O Z m z Q T x 0 m m m x 'D ;U C :i] < O p cZii Or n a m O Q n n T Z r �� Cp n m m v n c O m n� Q n m C 3 w it C> w ( m m 0 O O m m m T O �< m n n T 0) T r m T r � r� A 2 m m�� T D x D m > m a�rt�tt D r D O -i 3 c -O `2 Y Z =� D z- z C D r D D r m y g m i r - D G) D D Z Z m D Z c m z c m z O Z Z z m Z c b Z Z m Z y Z i Q K z G) m 3 m m D m G) O y m 0 m z D m m O D O K m m m Z m m m K y m y ON z Z Z G) m ? m G) n x m z -zi m Z Z n 1� Tmt K i � -i - K m r r r r r r r z z z m 0 Z Z z D z Z -I Z Z i Z Z Z Z G) G) G) 0 m K K K K 3 K 1 -1 -1 � -1 1 -4 T �o d W m 0 m o 0 N A W M C M s a m a M (p co a z z Z z z Z z z W 2 W 2 w :2 W �E W 2 W :2 W 2 w 2 w W W W W w w w �w F Q� W Q F' z Q a' Q a' Q Z Q: O F- Z Q a Q s F- F- Z Q F- a Z W z Z z W z z W O Z w Z Z z Z w W W W F- W J W W z w z W J W W W ZO W 2 W w W W W W W W 2 W U` O w Q w 2 Q 2 2 2i � Z W 2 z Q Z O Z z 0 Z C7 W o q g W Q z Z Z Z m Q p z Z O Z O Z Y W Z Z z Z ::)Z< Q Q Z LL LL y . a z p z z z z LL z a Q LL 0 0 0? Q p O O z z p< z LL> Q J ¢ Q ~ O Q i ¢ Q w ¢ ¢ � Q F ¢ ¢ G c� rG ns } Q ¢ Q 2 ¢ Q a w � �- 3: 2 z m -' IL 2i ¢ �= U f U p W w O w w Z w W a a W W W w U O U m O w Z N O Y O z W J O W W a J? O W K J 0 U J O a O a' m O a a U J a U K U a U a O U � U J O >- Q a �L U a U a O U J a a O U¢¢ W h U U Z Q z a U U J z W m w w QQ U m O U w 0? O x U m x O O m w w w x 0¢ m w w x O x w Y? m Z m O g W rn o m W U w U Y m O a w Z a o Q w m U a m w m w m w a K w m a 2 a a m a m w m U w LL F w a a O m OD v m s Z Z Z Z Z Z z U (Y m z O U 5 5 5 F- p m m p Z m W m Z -j m O p Z) m p x x J a Z x x m >- m } z Z w= m m a m } w z} U O c} o¢ F z¢ >¢ F m w m W w x m ¢ m ~ ¢ p a a O ¢a m O a w a z F F. m w a W w a g F m z r w w F m¢ � O = W a W Z W> w Z ::) W C D w n L ' w ¢ W m Q >> m w (n > z W W 0 Q W aQ C7 W m Q O K O Q z w¢¢¢� ¢ W U` d z0 z z Q¢ Q Fz-.- ¢¢>� a-J d Q m w x x? O w x a w m w LL U U U W U ¢ m o W t F U w U p F U > z U LL z o O p -i a z F z U t= a m w w Q_ Q z �>> F a w F a s a m V o j C7 0 0 0 W w O W w w¢ m ? a z O a W Q W z x F O rn a 7 a K 0 0 W a W 0 O Q¢ a z O d O z ¢ d w d m U> F U F- a C7 a U� U 2� O U t- m F- a m >- >- ZE O 2 Y- a CU F F- U w O W p U z O ? F- ( Q v w O o C) > m w D w O LL O U w 0 Z Z Z w Z a Q O p x z W �i z m r z w n a m W m U m O Z O a J � m K m w 2> Z) m W w m Y a E J� W U U 0 0.5 w� z ¢ W K >- C� w a z x Z m 0 0¢ W `z 2 ¢ 2 a a w w m W E F p a ¢ w m W g m CL U 0 x Q w z O O V w X o~ Q z z Q w w z¢ z w w w o m a z -' ° s w F w 0 O w F z m z ¢ z w 2 W U' W O Z C7 w C7 O O O p a d d t7 F >i g z O F o W x m o m= Z p 0 z Fgi ¢ F- m LL a' S Y F- z l -W i o 0 a > o x 0 U w WW O W X z o~ Z w m-, a w Z w J Q W LL 5 = o o m m z w w o z 55 W 2 m (n m w CC m Q Q W F- W W> O D >- U U U W x x 2 W 0 a F- F- F- F- >- 0 Z W O a > `G z O 0 a a n- a a o a w a a W m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m F- > > > > O O O N O O O (O O m O 0 O O 'Q O O O N O O O O O O O � O � O O O N O (p O M O O O O O O O O O M O co O O O O O LO N N 0 O p O C : O t0 ((J c0 O (O O c0 O aD O O O m � O O O � CO 4 M � 6 O (O O (A � (L7 O m O N M M Cl) O O O M O O C C N O 0 m — OJ r N (O m r m m (O r co O O t0 r r �- co M O � 0 O m Ln o O E N O C (D ( n N C, O N r M r Cl) (O m � N co (O O � M (D O Iq M M Cl) O CO O M (O O O O Q N r r (O O .- O N N C) O J U w X U ( V (n n 00 m O N M m M M co M r m M n m O Cl) C' C' N C' M C' C' C' (() V CO r C' C' M V m C' O ((� ((� N Lo CO Lo C' ( � ((� (O r m 00 m O M O N M M co C' O U L C' N " O N C' O C4 N 0 O N O a N C' O N C' O M O 0 M C' O Cl) V O Cl) C' C' O O co C' O 0 O C O C' O C' O O O O a 'IT O C' O 0 O 0 C O O V O V O C' C' O O C' "T O O O - a O O O n O r a O r O n O r O n O n O a n U n n r r r r n n n r r r n r n n n r r r r r r n r n n r n n n r n m Q Q 0 0 LL w U W W W W W W W W W W W W W W Q W U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U z LL' cr LL W w w 2 K LL' Q: w 2' Of w Of w 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 F- LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL W U z Z ¢ Y (n Y (n - Y W F Y O) F Y Z (n o F 0 Y 0 Y (n H Y Ul H Y Y Y Y Y Y Y (n (n (n Cn to to (n O F H F W F O Z ~' Z F I F F F z Z W O U' U` U` O O C9 U` U` W J LL' ¢ D: 2 5 K¢ D K D D D n 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 LLI 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¢ J 0 o U j O o 0 0 0 U( 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 o 0 0 m 0 W W F- W M F- W K F- W J J J w F- J O O W F- X F- K F- W J w w W X w cf F- -t F- F- F- F- F- F- c w In W 0 K• W W W W O W W W W W W W N O FF - if } ¢ W ¢ a rn o m m m m m W (L w w 0� 0 0 0 0 a. m m m 0 m m O Y at m ¢ y { } LL U F 0 U z z o f�- FF- p C w Q Q o F- U Q U U o n U ¢ Z Q J of of _ U ~ U O w a w m Q W Q o F- Z V) -j O J N w a g n w w w w w KS .6 06 w r H W W d' 0 a J J J J y a> U Z z z F- z U F 0 z LL 0 F- W m W W W W W D¢ F- F- 0 z z 0 0 Of w O O LL w ¢ Il.. W 3 W a- (O LL LL } LL¢ LL p p LL a_ a a w W¢ m w w w 0 a w 0 m d a m o o O V w 5 J J LL Z LL' LL LL W (/� J W U ¢ J w a w W F- W¢ F- �i LL o w¢¢ w 0} 3 0 p w LL O � O LL w O W w 0 2 J O F- F- 2 0 Z W J U w LL J > Z U) F W O OU Of W a z a U w z w m o Z x O� z p m w w w W a z o LL Q�¢ -' w O W w V) F Z { O -j= o F X z w z � LL O w U v w 0 w m w U Z W g w� w 0 w p o m w > O W 3 w ¢U` 0 0= w Q' w 0 ¢ p o o , 0 Z 0 F o c W W ` F 0 W J J w iU- ¢ U D EL a O Q w R K 0 mIU > x ¢Q N¢¢ ¢ U U w o C7 x �? -, O O¢ U U x m a w¢ z z 0 m m m> 0 F- c O r- In N O tp N O O p O (h c� ip N p =O E 6 N N m 6 an Q h c 4 (O c0 CJ N d c� O tO m n O Q N O Q Q N o> O O ¢ O) n C6 m N N (O Q c� Q N Q tO Q) N N N O J U' W of Y rm LO LO Y U t tO O Co (O n (O GD O O (O O n N Q M 1� n n n (4 n CO (O n n CO c0 O O Cl) Q tO n n co m co co co c0 U o n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 0 o o n n n n o n 0 n C n CDC 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n n n n n n n 0 a m ca o� d L W m W E CL E o O o Y S U O U O LL t O U } F- j U O co C (O O N !- 1n to r r V (o O N O O A o V O o W t0 (p O O to r 7 C to t0 M C CO Ch M N T (p ate-- t0 i- to C7 O'J t0 C7 CO N � to to co to to � N ¢ 7 CO tq ` O 1_ 47 O 10 r- N V O r N N m O F Q W V- Z w n LL O LL F Y W to U W W Z Z (9 �' W O Z (� > W W O Z (D LL Of w W g U 0 z? 5 O O LL O J ~ ~ W 2 Q jE w m w W Z W O LLJ Z ¢ 0 O u U � U D K d M LL U Y � W (D O w p¢¢ w a U to to m m m w U m to t1 O O O N O V O W O N N O N LO O O O O O O O O O to O N V U') E O 0 0 0 0 m T to w 0 0 O U O N O N 0 N O '7 O C O 7 Q 0 O r O !� ti r O O 0 O O Cl 0 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting 1. Roll Call at 7:00 p.m. 2. Approval of the Agenda September 4, 2001 3. Approval of Consent Business - (All items noted by an 4 are anticipated to be routine. After a discussion by the President, there will be an opportunity for members of the EDA to remove items from the consent agenda for individual discussion. Those items removed will be considered in their normal sequence on the agenda. Those items remaining on the consent agenda will otherwise not be individually discussed and will be enacted in one motion.) A.) 4 Approval of Minutes: 4. Financial A.) 4 Approval of Bills B.) 2001 / 02 Tax Levy and Budget Adoption Resolution 5. Small Cities Development Program A.) Activity update from Carver County HRA - (will be on table) 6. Other Business: 7. Adjourn to September 10 (workshop) ?... to review Economic Development Strategic Plan with ED Advisory Committee... 91 just adjourn, and adopt the Economic Development Strategic Plan at the Oct 2 nd regular meeting. edagenda.doe July 1 2001 Members Present: President iZTorke, Amundson, Sweeney, Link, Brekke Members Absent: None Staff Present: Mark McNeill, City Administrator, Bruce Loney, Public Works Director /City Engineer; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director; Jim Thomson, City Attorney; Paul Snook, Economic Development Coordinator, Tracy Coenen, Management Assistant; Mark Themig, Facilities and Recreation Director, and Mark McQuillan, Natural Resources Director. I. Roll Call: President Morke called the meeting of the Economic Development Authority to order at 7:20 p.m. Roll call was taken as noted above. Approval of Agenda: Sweeney/Link moved to approve the agenda as presented. Motion carried unanimously. Approval of the Consent Agenda: Items removed from the Consent Agenda were: 3.a (partial) May 1, 2001 meeting minutes and 4.a approval of the bills. Sweeney /Amundson moved to approve the Consent Agenda as modified. Motion carried unanimously. A.) Approval of the minutes for May 15,2001: Sweeney /Amundson moved to approve the May 15, 2001 meeting minutes. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Sweeney /Amundson moved to approve the minutes for May 1, 2001. Motion carried unanimously with President Morke abstaining. Present Morke was not in attendance at the May 1, 2001 meeting. IV. Financial: A.) Approval of the bills: Commissioner Brekke had a question on the bills. Commissioner Brekke felt the amount of the bills from Carver County HRA was too much to be passed under the Consent Agenda. Mr. Snook explained that the bills included reimbursements to Carver County H.R.A. for contractors for work done under the Small Cities Development Program. Amundson/Sweeney moved to approve the bills for the EDA in the amount of $84,411.88 for the period 06/01/01 to 07/05/01. Motion carried unanimously. Official Proceedings of the Shakopee Economic Development Authority July 10, 2001 Page —2- V. Small Cities Development Program: A.) Activity Update from Carver County : Mr. Paul Snook, Economic Development Coordinator, updated the EDA on the Small Cities Development Program (SCDP). Mr. Paul Snook stated that basically not much has changed from thepFevious month's report regarding the Small Cities Development Program. The percentages that have been allocated to this date for each of the three categories are as follows: 63% for Single - Family Residential, 68% for Rental Residential and 4.5% for Commercial. A total of 44% of all the money funded for the Small Cities Development Program has been allocated. Mr. Snook discussed the possible extension of the target area and the extension of the grant period for the Shakopee Small Cities Development Program (SCDP). Several months ago the City Council asked the EDA to apply for an extension of time for the grant monies from the Small Cities Development Program_ When the EDA applied for a time extension and the reallocation of funds, they were told that they should wait a while_ Recently, the City of Shakopee has been in contact with DIED, Ms. Leona Humphrey, Shakopee's representative at DTED. What is necessary is a grant modification agreement. This can be done with a letter to DTED and Resolution No. 5557. Mr. Snook oriented where the target area is now for the SCDP and also the proposed extension areas for the SCDP. Brekke/Link moved to recommend to the City Council approval of Resolution No. 5557. Motion carried unanimously. VI. Other Business: There was no other business_ Adiournment: Sweeney/Brekke moved to adjourn the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 7:30 p-m. Motion carried unanimously. Judith S. Cox, EDA Secretary Carole Hedlund, Recording Secretary CONSEOT `. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: President & Commissioners Mark H. McNeill, Executive Director FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director SUBJ: EDA Bill List DATE: August 30, 2001 Introduction Below is a listing of bills for the EDA for the period 08/03/01 - 08/30/01. Action Requested Move to approve bills in the amount of $186.57 for the EDA General Fund. Check Date Check Number Vendor Description Amount 8/15/01 70260 Intertechnology telephone $ .79 8/29/01 70442 Scott Co Treas. 2001 TIF billing 168.00 8/29/01 70433 Qwest telephone 18.57 Total $187.36 Annual Current Month YTD Exp. Avail. Description Budget Actual Balance Balance % % 02190 EDA-' 19 EDA 234,520.00 7,001.04 127,359.22 107,160.78 54.3 45.7 02190 EDA 234,520.00 7,001.04 127,359.22 107,160.78 54.3 45.7 A a �m , SAKOPEE EDA Memorandum TO: EDA Chairman and Commissioners Mark McNeill, EDA Director FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: 2001/02 Tax Levy And Budget Adoption Resolution DATE: August 28, 2001 Introduction Attached is Resolution Number 01 -4 which requests the Shakopee City Council to consent to the tax levy for the EDA, levy a tax for the EDA and adopts the 2002 budget. Background There are two statutes under which a tax for the purposes of the EDA may be levied. The major differences as far as the levy is concerned are: MSA 469.107 has broader purposes allowed than 469.003 but the distinction is not clearly defined. Basically, the HRA levy is for redevelopment. The EDA levy is for redevelopment and new development and is included under the city's levy limit. Resolution No. 01 -4 has been prepared with a levy of $20,300 under the HRA levy MSA 469.033 and $60,880 under the EDA levy MSA 469.107. Last year the levies were $47,010 under the HRA levy MSA 469.033 and $47,010 (after reduction for HACA) under the EDA levy MSA 469.107. The proposed budget is attached with appropriations in the amount of $317,180. Included are the tax payments to ADC from the City and the County. Other costs not included but borne by the General Fund HRA EDA 469.033 469.107 Levied by EDA City City consent yes yes Under City levy limit no yes 2001/02 EDA levy limit $190,942 $240,401 Taxable Market Value rate .0144 .01813 MSA 469.107 has broader purposes allowed than 469.003 but the distinction is not clearly defined. Basically, the HRA levy is for redevelopment. The EDA levy is for redevelopment and new development and is included under the city's levy limit. Resolution No. 01 -4 has been prepared with a levy of $20,300 under the HRA levy MSA 469.033 and $60,880 under the EDA levy MSA 469.107. Last year the levies were $47,010 under the HRA levy MSA 469.033 and $47,010 (after reduction for HACA) under the EDA levy MSA 469.107. The proposed budget is attached with appropriations in the amount of $317,180. Included are the tax payments to ADC from the City and the County. Other costs not included but borne by the General Fund of the City are utility costs, administrative overhead such as accounting and bill processing /payroll, publishing, postage, and other employees time on related issues. Some allowance ($3,700) has been made in the wages amount for charge -ins from Community Development. The EDA needs to adopt a proposed maximum levy and budget amount by September 15 for certification to the County Auditor. That levy will be used for the tax notice mailed to property owners. Action Offer Resolution Number 01 -4, A Resolution Setting The Tax Levy For 2001/02 By The Economic Development Authority For The City of Shakopee And Adopting The 2002 Budget, and move its adoption. � Gregg Voxland Finance Director g: \budget02 \budres02 RESOLUTION NO. 01 -4 A RESOLUTION SETTING THE TAX LEVY FOR 2001/02 BY THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE AND ADOPTING THE 2002 BUDGET WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority (EDA) in and for the City of Shakopee was created pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.051 et seq., as amended, and WHEREAS, Section 469.107 states that for economic development purposes, the governing body of the municipality may levy a tax at the request of the EDA, and Section 469.033 states that for redevelopment purposes, the EDA may levy a tax with the consent of the governing municipality, and WHEREAS, the By -Laws of the EDA for the City of Shakopee provides that a budget be prepared on an annual basis, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the EDA hereby requests the City Council of the City of Shakopee to levy a special tax of $60,880 pursuant to MSA 469.107 to be collected in 2002 for the EDA by the City of Shakopee. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the EDA levies a special tax of $20,300 pursuant to MSA 469.033 to be collected in 2002 by the EDA and hereby requests the City Council of the City of Shakopee to consent to such levy. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the attached 2002 General Fund Budget be approved with total appropriations in the amount of $317,180. Adopted in session of the Shakopee Economic Development Authority for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of September, 2001. Chairman ATTEST: Executive Director EDA FUND 2002 BUDGET ACTIVITY: Activity includes the operation of the Shakopee Economic Development Authority. The EDA's mission is to enhance the quality of life in Shakopee by expanding and strengthening the local economy; broadening the city's job base and increasing its revenue base through facilitating the preservation, expansion, creation and attraction of quality businesses and related jobs. Implement strategies and administer various programs (grants, loans, etc.) to accomplish above activities. Staff must maintain EDA records and prepare materials for policy decisions by Commissioners. The Commission is comprised of the Mayor and City Council. Section 469.107 of the Minnesota Statutes states that the governing body may, at the request of the authority, levy a tax in any year for the benefit of the authority. The tax must be not more than 0.01813 percent of taxable market value. OBJECT DESCRIPTION: Description of lines items: Wages & Benefits: EDA Director, EDA Coordinator, share of City Staff including Planning Director. Professional Services: Legal and other consulting costs. Small Cities Development Program $124,000 included in supplies & services- Dues/Training/Travel: Membership dues for professional economic development associations such as the International Economic Development Council, Economic Development Association of Minnesota, and Mid - America Economic Development Council. Various conferences and training courses sponsored by professional economic development associations as outlined above. Miscellaneous: $ 92,750 for ADC Telecommunications, Inc., local effort assistance. ADC II does not affect 2002 budget. CITY OF SHAKOPEE 2002 BUDGET EDA FUND BUDGET SUMMARY Revenue Taxes Intergovernmental State Aid Charges for Service Interest Miscellaneous Total Revenue Transfers Total Revenue and Transfers Expenditures 1999 2000 2001 2002 Actual Actual Budget Proposed $109,058 $632 $94,020 $ 81,180 96,048 85,514 80,500 66,000 124,000 16,323 35,344 8,000 13,000 1,000 229,962 240,284 234,520 222,429 121,490 182,520 284,180 45,000 Excess (Deficiency) Of Revenues 50,000 33,000 267,429 121,490 232,520 317,180 Personal Services 55,133 56,354 69,520 69,930 Supplies & Services 174,829 183,930 32,500 154,500 ADC Payment 132,500 92,750 Contingency Total Expenditures 229,962 240,284 234,520 317,180 Excess (Deficiency) Of Revenues over Expenditures & Transfers 37,467 (118,794) (2,000) - Fund Balance December 31 $417,186 $298,392 $296,392 $296,392 Note: 2001 ADC pmt city @$50,000 & county @$82,500. Note: 2002 ADC pmt city @$33,000 & county @$66,000. Note: State Aid is from the Small Cities Development Program this is a pass through grant and is included in supplies & services on the expense side $124,000. EDA 400 400 Materials 2002 Budget Business Unit Business Unit - 2190 2191 126,000 Description Benefits Management Total Wages FT - Reg. - 56,850 56,850 Wages OT - Reg. Telephone 300 - PERA 500 2,950 2,950 FICA 200 4,350 4,350 Health & Life 4,280 4,280 Dental 300 - 300 Workers Comp 200 Building Rent (IS FUND) 200 Compensated Absences 1,000 1,000 Retirement Benefit 1,000 1,000 - Total Personnel 5,780 64,150 69,930 Operating Supplies 400 400 Materials - Equipment Maintenance - Professional Services 126,000 126,000 Attorney 20,000 20,000 Other - Postage 100 100 Telephone 300 300 Printing /Publishing 500 500 Advertising 200 200 Insurance 2,400 2,400 Property Insurance - Rentals - Equipment Rent - Building Rent (IS FUND) 1,500 1,500 Other - Conf / School / Training 1,000 1,000 Travel /Subsistence 500 500 Dues 1,000 1,000 Subscriptions /Publications 600 600 Designated Miscellaneous 92,750 92,750 Total Supplies & Services - 247,250 247,250 Capital Expenditures - Expenses Charged Back Total $ 5,780 $ 311,400 $ 317,180 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Economic Development Authority FROM: Paul Snook, Economic Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Small Cities Development Program (SCDP) - update MEETING DATE: September 4, 2001 Enclosed is the August 2001 update on the Small Cities Development Program (SCDP) from the Carver County HRA. In summary, the HRA reports the following SCDP funding activity: Amount % of Funds Amount Committed/ Committed/ Funded Allocated Allocated Single Family Residential (goal: 30 units) $369,000 $231,310 63% Rental Residential (goal. 30 units) $121,500 $82,500 68% Commercial $251,250 $11,215 4.5% (goal. 15 units) TOTAL $741,750 $325,025 44% Note: The numbers in parentheses next to the property types listed above indicate the "rehabbed property unit goals" by property type for Shakopee's SCDP program, set by the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development. been making progress on obtaining bids and will be put on the waiting list if we receive many new applicants (the program allows for 60 days to obtain bids, but we can extend this if no one else is waiting for the funds). One of the three remaining applicant's home is listed on the Historic Register and the HRA is working with the Historical Society to make sure the improvements meet the Secretary of the Interior's work specifications. Amount Funded $369,000.00 Amount Committed $151,834.60 (closed on their loans) Amount Allocated $ 79 475.00 (have been approved) Balance Remaining $137,690.40 Applicants that- -have closed HRA Loan Number: NO NEW APPLICANTS TO REPORT Household Composition: Loan Amount: Gross Income: Improvements: Market Value of the Property: Rental Rehabilitation • ■ Any rental owner may apply for the program as long as their property is located in the targeted Small Cities Boundary. 51% of their rental units need to be leased by tenants at or below 80% of Metro Area -Median Income, and the rents for all of the units would need to be at or below the Fair Market Rents. If the property is in the targeted area, and both the tenant's income and rent are within the allowable limits a property owner would be eligible for a deferred loan up to $10,000 per unit. A maximum loan amount is currently under advisement with city staff. The owner is required to match these dollars with a 50% match. This is a secured loan, which will be forgiven after seven years. Compliance of rent restriction and tenant characteristics is in force for the full seven years. The loan is forgiven on a pro -rated basis of 14.28% per year. - After their application has been approved, Bill Schwanke, the HRA's Rehab Advisor, will schedule an appointment to inspect the rental property to determine what improvements should be incorporated into the scope of work. Bill will draw up a work write -up for the homeowner to submit to contractors. It is the responsibility of the homeowner to select the contractor(s). Commercial Rehabilitation Project MIMIC Any commercial property owner may apply for the program as long as their property is located in the targeted Small Cities Boundary. Note: this boundary is the small area located in the core downtown area of the bigger Small Cities targeted area. Priority is -given to owner occupied structures or where leases are currently in place. Building improvements must be directed toward correcting defects or deficiencies in the property affecting the aesthetics or the property safety, energy consumption, structural/mechanical systems, habitability or handicapped accessibility of the property. Owners are eligible for 50% of the total commercial repair costs, with a maximum loan up to $25,000. The loan is a deferred loan for seven years; which is pro- rated in case of sale. Commercial Rehab Summary Currently Carver County HRA has received 2 new inquiries; this is in addition to the original 12 from our initial marketing of the program. Out of those inquiries six have completed their applications. Our second commercial loan closed on April 27 th , 2001. One of the four is currently working with our rehab specialist to obtain bids and close on their loan. One of the original inquiries from last fall has just recently submitted their completed commercial application; our rehab advisor has met w/ the applicant and is devising a scope of work. One of the preliminarily approved commercial applicants has recently dropped from the program; due to potential relocation. Amount Funded $251,250.00 Amount Committed $11,215.49 (closed on their loans) Amount Allocated $0.00 (have been approved) Balance Remaining $240,034.51 AP7 that have closed HRA Loan Number: Loan Amount: Gross Income: 0 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor & City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Recognition of Youth Building Remodeling and Skate Park Construction by the Public Works Department DATE: September 4, 2001 INTRODUCTION: City Council is asked to recognize the performance of the Public Works Department in the remodeling of the Youth Building in Lions Park and for the construction of the Skate Park by the Community Center. BACKGROUND: On February 6, 2001, City Council authorized the Public Works Department to act as the general contractor to perform the repairs and remodeling needed for the Youth Building in Lions Park. After architectural review of the building, the estimate for all repairs to be bid out would be at a cost as high as quarter of a million dollars. The Public Works Department utilizing much of the labor within the department and two sub - contractors, Minnesota Plumbing and Choice Electric were able to do the work at a substantially lower cost. The cost to date for the Youth Building repairs amounts to $68,128.75 plus Public Works labor. With this remodeling and repair, the Youth Building was restored to have handicapped accessible bathrooms, new carpet, new storage facilities and repairing and restoring building interior that was badly needed. On April 3, 2001, the City Council authorized the Public Works Department to serve as general contractor for construction of the Skate Park pad by the Community Center. The Public Works Department utilizing its labor and equipment with occasional rental of equipment was able to install the necessary drainage facilities and the required excavation and grading work to construct the Skate Park facility. The Public Works Department also utilized sub - contractors for the paving, fencing and irrigation system to complete the project. The Public Works Department will also install the landscaping and turf establishment. This project was designed by the City's Engineering Department and the Public Works Department did the construction within the time frame as desired by the Park Advisory Board. The Skate Park has since opened and is being utilized quite frequently on a daily basis. During the remodeling of the Youth Building and construction of the Skate Park the Public Works staff, under the leadership of Michael Hullander, was able to complete these tasks and still maintain the maintenance functions that are necessary for the operation of the City. This was accomplished by planning these extra projects into a work schedule in order to save the City dollars and to produce a higher quality product for the benefit of the citizens. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 5578, A Resolution of Accommodation to the Public Works Department and move its adoption. ruce Loney Public Works Director BL/p-p MEMO i i is TO THE PUBLIC71; 7M — nfrEi E AS, the City Council of Shakopee authorized the Public Works Department to act a general contractor for the Youth Building repairs and Skate Park construction; and WHEREAS, the amount of repairs for the Youth Building repairs was estimated at $250,00.00 if the work was contracted out; and V*'HEREAS, the Public Works Department acting as the general contractor was able to complete the Youth Building repair prod ect under $100,000.00 including labor, materials and subcontractors; and WHEREAS, the Public Works Department acting as the general contractor was Ax able to construct the Skate Park facility by the Community Center this summer; and WHEREAS, the Public Works Department did an outstanding job in completing this project while maintaining an acceptable level of service on City maintenance activities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: that the Public Works Department is hereby commended for their outstanding performance and commitment in completing the Youth Building repairs and Skate he Pesidents o construction saving fashion he Community of Shakopee. that was in the best interest of t Adopted in _______ session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 2001. Mayor of the City of Shakopee City Clerk q ® 0 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor & City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Letter of Credit Analysis for Private Developments DATE: September 4, 2001 INTRODUCTION: At the August 21, 2001 City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to review the Letter of Credit policy for public improvement projects associated with private development in the City of Shakopee. BACKGROUND: On November 5, 1997, the City Council changed its policy in the developer agreements for a Letter of Credit percentage of 25% for the guarantee of the payment of assessments associated with public improvement projects. At this meeting the Council adopted a policy to require a 75% Letter of Credit amount to be used for financial guarantee of assessments associated with developer projects. This policy has worked well for the City of Shakopee for those public improvement projects that have been ordered in conjunction with the same time line as the private developments being constructed. In the situation with Sarazin Street and Valley View Road, in which the developers of Prairie Village and Pheasant Run have petitioned the City for the improvement of those streets, the City Council has not yet ordered the improvement project for those streets. Standard practice for City staff has been to place pending assessments on properties that will benefit from City improvement projects that have been ordered by City Council. These estimated assessments are utilized by mortgage companies as a future encumbrance on the property and require an escrow deposit to be incorporated in the closing with the sale of that property. In other words, mortgage companies require an escrow payment by the developer for the pending assessments, which is held by the mortgage company until the assessment is adopted and levied by the City Council. After the levy of this assessment, the mortgage company will take the escrow deposit and pay off the assessments for the public improvement project. Staff believes that a 75% Letter of Credit is sufficient when the project has been ordered in conjunction with the development of property. The pending assessments along with the Letter of Credit does give the City substantial security for the payment of assessments for the public improvement projects. In the situation where the City has not ordered a project, the Letter of Credit does not cover 100% of the potential of the assessment nor are there any pending assessments, as the project has not been ordered. In this particular situation, staff would recommend a higher percentage of Letter of Credit be required by developers to be issued to the City of Shakopee, until such time as the project has been ordered and then the Letter of Credit could be reduced to 75 %. At the August 21, 2001 City Council meeting, City Council expressed a desire to raise the Letter of Credit amount to either 100% of the estimated assessments or 125% of the estimated assessments. Staff would also recommend that this Letter of Credit could be reduced once a project has been ordered and pending assessments placed on the developer's property. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Determine the amount of financial security the developers must provide prior to a public project being ordered by the City Council. 2. Do not change the current policy. 3. Table for additional information. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend Alternative No. 1, to determine a percentage amount for the Letter of Credit security for the payment of future assessments on public improvement projects. This percentage should either be 100% of the estimated assessments or 125% of the estimated assessments and be incorporated in the developer's agreement between the City and the developer. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve a motion dete the amount of financial security the developer must provide on a public improvement project, prior to the project being ordered by the City Council. Bruce Loney Public Works Director BL/pmp LETTER/CREDIT Is'-6-s- CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor & City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director SUBJECT: 2001 Traffic Studies for Various Areas in the City of Shakopee DATE: September 4, 2001 INTRODUCTION: The City Engineering Department has conducted several traffic studies throughout the summer months for stop sign warrants. Attached to this memo are the traffic studies and staff's recommendations. BACKGROUND: Throughout the year, staff has received requests for traffic sign studies from residents, Council and staff. Attached is a traffic study on various intersections in the City and are as follows: • Pheasant Run Street • Barrington Drive • Vierling Drive and Crossroad accesses • Valley Park Drive and 12 Avenue • Adams Street & 6th Avenue • Adams Street & 4 th Avenue • Market Street & Shakopee Avenue The City of Shakopee prepared a signing plan to address the signage in the City and policies for traffic control signage. Per City Code, the installation or removal of any traffic regulatory signs must be authorized by the City Council. Included in the Signing Report is the current "Stop Sign" Policy that is adopted by the City. Study areas were investigated for stop sign control and to review the level of traffic speed. Study Area #1 - The traffic studies along Pheasant Run Street is that this street is acting as a local collector street. In fact, French Trace Avenue, Quail Drive and Pheasant Run Street is the main street serving the Prairie Village, French Trace and Pheasant Run developments. Staff is recommending that stop signs be installed along all side streets that intersect with this route. The traffic volumes, accident history and driver confusion on intersection priority are reasons for this recommendation. Study Area #2 — The conclusion is for 30 m.p.h. speed limit signs to be installed off of the County roads to alert and remind motorists of the speed limit on local roads which has been done previously. Study Area #3 — Staff has performed turning movement traffic counts at fifteen intervals for determination of the volume at intersections along Vierling Drive to the commercial district. It is recommended that WSB & Associates, Inc. be authorized to perform a traffic analysis to determine the level of service and what improvements, if any, should be done. Attached to this memo is a proposal from WSB & Associates for $2,800.00 to perform the traffic study. Study Area #4 — Valley Park Drive and 12 Avenue study shows no change. Study Area #5 — Adams Street & 6 th Avenue does not meet the warrant criteria for a 4- way stop condition. The warrant for speed is met as a number of cars are exceeding 30 m.p.h. and also traffic volume. City policy is for three out of five warrants to be met for an all -way stop condition. Recommendations at this time is for more police enforcement and to restudy the intersection at a later date. For Adams Street and 4 th Avenue, the recommendation is for no change at this time. Study Area #6 — The intersection of Shakopee Avenue and Market Street does not meet the warrants for either a two way of four way stop conditions. However, this intersection does have yield signs on Market Street and staff would recommend changing the signs to stop signs due to a pedestrian school route to Pearson Elementary. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Direct staff to install stop signs and other signs as recommended to the intersections in Study Areas #1 and #6. 2. Direct staff to install stop signs in other locations as determined by the City Council. 3. Authorize WSB & Associates, Inc. to perform a traffic study along Vierling Drive by Crossroads Center. 4. Table for additional information from staff. IN 17 N Is le Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 and No. 3. ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Direct staff to install stop signs and other signs as recommended to the intersections in Study Areas #1 and #6. 2. Approve a motion authorizing WSB & Associates, Inc. to perform a traffic study along Vierling Drive by Crossroads Center at a cost not -to- exceed $2,800.00. t � Bruce Loney Public Works Director BL/pmp STOPSIGNS Re: Proposal for Engineering Services Vierling Drive West of CSAH 17 Dear Mr. Loney: WSB & Associates, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal for professional engineering services for development of a traffic study for Vierling Drive west of CSAH 17 in the vicinity of the Boulder Ridge and Crossroads Center commercial district. The City Council and local residents in this area have expressed concerns with the traffic operations on Vierling Drive and at the intersection of CSAH 17. The primary issues with respect to traffic operations in this area are the delays and backup of traffic at the access points to the developments and on CSAH 17. With the Boulder Ridge and Crossroads Center development nearing completion, now is an opportune time to re- evaluate the geometries and traffic control along Vierling Drive. Based on our understanding of this project, we have developed a scope of services and cost estimate to complete the traffic study. Scope of Work Task 1— Data Collection Available data will be collected from Scott County and the City of Shakopee. This data will include the existing traffic volume data collected by City Staff and County Staff, and crash data to be assembled by City Staff. Task 2 — Intersection Analysis A. Traffic Based on the traffic volume information, WSB will conduct a traffic analysis of each intersection to document the current level of service and capacity. This will include determining AM, PM and daily levels of service, and average delays at each intersection. 4150 Olson B. Traffic Control An analysis of the existing two -way stops and future potential Memorial Highway signalization of the development access will be conducted. Suite 300 C Crash Data A crash analysis will be conducted using the previous three years of crash Minneapolis history at each intersection. This analysis will document the crash and severity rates in Minnesota each intersection and conclusions will be made as to type of crashes and if there are any patterns of any specific types of crashes. 55422 763.541.4800 763 - 5411700 FAX Minneapolis • St. Cloud - Equal Opportunity Employer Mr. Bruce Loney, P.E. City of Shakopee August 13, 2001 Page 2 D. Geometric Analysis A geometric analysis will be conducted for Vierling Drive, which will review the horizontal and vertical alignments, as well as lane requirements and vehicle storage requirements. Task 3 — Conclusions and Recommendations Based on the traffic analysis, crash analysis, recommendations for potential improvements will level estimated cost for each proposed improvement, and geometric analysis, conclusions and be prepared. This will include a planning Task 4 — Report Preparation An intersection traffic engineering study will be developed documenting the data collected, results of each analysis, and the conclusions and recommendations of the study. This report will be submitted to City Staff in a draft format for their review. Following review by City Staff, a final report will be prepared and submitted to City Council for review and approval. Estimated Cost The estimated cost for preparation of the traffic study based on the above scope of services will be as follows: Task1 — Data Collection .................................................................... ............................... $300.00 Task 2 — Intersection Analysis ......................................................... ............................... $1,500.00 Task 3 — Conclusions & Recommendations ....................................... ............................... $500.00 Task4 — Report Preparation ............................................................... ............................... $500.00 Total ................................................................................................ ............................... $2,800.00 If you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (763) 287 -7183. Once again, we appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Shakopee and look forward to working with you on this project. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Charles T. Rickart, P.E. Associate / Project Manager c: Bret Weiss, WSB & Associates, Inc. f PAshakopEE\misc \081301 Vierling Dr W of CSAH 17.doc Erik Alan Wiebold . 1843 Quail Drive Shakopee, MN 55379 Dakota Home Phone 952 -402 -9343 Hello my name is Erik Wiebold and due to my work schedule, I am unable to attend this VERY important meeting. Fortunately my neighbor Matt Rude has "given up his time" to speak on behalf of some of us. (Thanks Matt) I believe the issue at hand is the stop sign placement in the pheasant run addition. As a resident who has been here for 3 years, I can only say it's about time! I'm sure I see it much worse than other residents as Quail Drive and Pheasant Run Street meet at my home. I'm sure many of you do not understand the volume of traffic that takes place on these 2 roads. As much as nobody wants to admit it, these are the MAIN through streets for over 200 homes in the neighborhood. Construction traffic does NOT use Valley View which only increases the burden on the streets and traffic flow as well. I guess some questions that I would like answered are ... In the Townhouse development across from the new Holiday Station, why do they have stop signs already? How come there are no signs in the French Trace and Orrin Thompson development? I also understand that there is to be a sign at the intersection of Pheasant Run and Quail on the East side and that this was dictated by "foot traffic" due to access to SUN PATH and the Park H W do you study FOOT TRAFFIC? Did you have someone sitting out there counting the number of people that walk by? Or did you use a "Average" method of taking the total number of residents in the development? If the path between the two homes is there to help people get to the school and park, wouldn't that intersection at least require CROSSWALKS Another thing that I doubt nobody took into consideration ... Every intersection in this development is a SCHOOL PICK IT P T! ! ! There needs to be signs up in this development and future developments, I believe that the role of a community and community government is to listen to the PEOPLE of the community! We really don't need to spend money on studies to tell you what all us resident already know! As we discuss this issue at hand, please don't use the excuse that "DRIVER ATTITUDE is the root of some of these problems. That maybe true but us members of the community need to take a stand for our protection. If any of you read the Friday edition of the Star Tribune, there was a article about a 18 year old in Pennsylvania being charged with manslaughter because he was driving 70 through a residential and lost control jumping the curb and runnin over 2 children. DON'T LET IT COME TO THIS! Could we also get some speed limit signs posted, what exactly is the residential speed limit. And if it's 30mph how can we get that changed? The reason I ask is because Vierling to the East past the fire station is 35. How can this be only 5 mph higher than ours when it's a full 4 lane road, and NO home face the street? I notice numerous times cops parked along there doing "speed traps ", maybe we need speed traps also especially when the construction traffic is leaving between 3p.m. and 5p-m.. In closing I want to thank you for your time and hope you will help us 'in being PROA 'in our quest for neighborhood and city. And please remember those of the COMMUNITY are - - I you have • ,• In one other un- related item, can someone check into the law regarding hunting near schools and home. Over the past weekend, there were goose hunters in the field to the east of Sun Path shooting. That's getting a little close. Sincerely, CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor & City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Consider Revised Parking Restrictions for Snow Emergency DATE: September 4, 2001 INTRODUCTION: The Public Works Department and the Police Department would like to discuss the current snow ordinances on parking during snowy weather for the City of Shakopee and possible revisions in this ordinance. BACKGROUND: The City of Shakopee has had calendar parking during snowy weather or snow emergencies between November 15 and April 1 St and allowed parking on one side of the street during these snow emergencies. The ordinance for parking restrictions is in the City Code, Section 9.50, Subdivision 2 and is as follows: • Between November 15 and April 1 St , inclusive, parking is prohibited on the west and south side of streets or avenues on odd number days for the day beginning at 2:00 A.M. and until 6:00 A.M. and on the east and north side of streets or avenues on even number of days for the day be ginnin g at 2:00 A.M. and until 6:00 A.M. Also the City Code prohibits parking on 2 nd Avenue, between Sommerville Street and Naumkeag Street. These parking restrictions described in the City Code will be in effect and enforced when weather conditions warrant plowing and will continue in effect until the same roadway has been plowed or removed to the full width of the roadway. Plowing operations per City Policy, which was adopted previously, begin when the snow accumulation is 2 inches or more. For snow emergency routes, which are those routes designated as the main routes that have the highest priority for snow removal. The City Code prohibits parking on either side of those streets. Another issue staff would like to discuss with City Council is the towing provision in the City Code and this provision currently states that a person in violation of the parking restriction outlined in Section 9.50 shall be initially tagged and shall have 4 hours from the time of the citation is issued to remove the vehicle or be subject to be towed at their expense. This requirement is in areas not designated as snow emergency routes. In order to discuss this issue, staff has enclosed the following: • Current City Code on parking restrictions during snowy weather, Section 9.50 • Copies of other City's ordinances that deal with snow accumulation, snow removal or snow emergencies. Staff did receive a number of City's ordinances in regard to snow removal and these Cities are as follows: • Richfield • Robbinsdale • Brooklyn Park • Crystal • Hastings • Prior Lake • Eden Prairie • Edina • Bloomington • Savage • Chaska In almost all of these Cities except Chaska the snow emergency parking restrictions for the entire City could be summarized as follows: After a snowfall of at least 2 inches, parking is prohibited on public streets, highways and alleys in the City and on property owned or leased by the City. Parking may not resume on the street, highways or alleys until it has been plowed and snow removed to the curb line. Parking may not be resumed on property owned or leased by the City until the property has been plowed to perimeters thereof. Staff desires to discuss this issue with City Council because of the growth of the City and the problems with calendar parking versus prohibiting parking on either side of the street. Staff s opinion, in most areas of the City, is to keep vehicles off of the streets and alleys until those facilities have been plowed to the full width and would result in a safer and less costly snow removal operation. Also the Police Department feels that the current calendar parking restriction is somewhat confusing and has been difficult to enforce. Staff will make a presentation on this item at the City Council meeting or this ite could be moved to the September 10, 2001 work session meeting. The items for discussion will be as follows: 1. Whether the City Council wishes to change the calendar parking for the City of Shakopee in its entirety or for a portion of the City. 2. Should the City Council change the towing provision in Section 9.50 to remove the requirement of a 4 -hour waiting time to remove a vehicle that has been tagged and may be in need of removal. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Discuss the parking restriction code for snow emergencies and provide staff with direction on whether to revise the current code or not. 2. Table for additional information and to the September 10, 2001 Council meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council discuss the parking restrictions that is currently allowed in the City of Shakopee with the Public Works and Police Department's staff and provide direction on revisions to the City Code. ACTION REQUESTED: Provide direction to the City staff on any revisions to the City Code on parking during street maintenance snowy weather in the Central Business District or table to September 10, 2001 Council meeting. 4 ' ruce Loney r/ Public Works Director BIJpmp RESTRICTIONS 5 141jK C §9.50 Chapter. When any police officer finds a vehicle unattended upon any street or municipally -owned parking lot in violation of any parking regulation, such officer is hereby authorized to impound such unlawfully parked vehicle and to provide for the removal thereof and to remove the same to a convenient garage or other facility or place of safety, provided, that if any charge shall be placed against such vehicle for cost of removal or storage, or both, by anyone called upon to assist therewith the same shall be paid prior to removal from such place of storage or safekeeping. (Ord. 1, April 1, 1978) SEC. 9.42. UNATTENDED VEHICLE. Subd. 1. Engine Running. It is unlawful for any person to leave a motor vehicle unattended while the engine is running. Subd. 2. Kevin-ignition. It is unlawful for any person to leave a motor vehicle unattended with the key in the ignition. (Ord. 1, April 1, 1978) SEC. 9.43. VEHICLE REPAIR ON STREET. It is unlawful for any person to service, repair, assemble or dismantle any vehicle parked upon a street, or attempt to do so, except to service such vehicle with gasoline or oil or to provide emergency repairs thereon. (Ord. 1, April 1, 1978) It is unlawful for any person to park a vehicle on any street for the purpose of selling merchandise thereon or therein, or advertising any merchandise for sale or a forthcoming event. (Ord. 174, June 27, 1985) SEC. 9.45. INOPERABLE VEHICLES. Passenger vehicles and trucks in an inoperative state or without a current license plate, shall not be parked in Residential Districts for a period exceeding seven (7) days. "Inoperative" means incapable of movement under its own power and in need of repairs. (Ord. 338, August 6, 1992) SECTIONS 9.46 - 9.49. Reserved. SEC. 9.50. PARKING DURING STREET MAINTENANCE, SNOWY WEATHER, AND I CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. Subd. 1. During Maintenance. There shall be no parking on any City street, alley or public parking lot when all or any of said street, alley or public parking lot is designated and/or posted for maintenance work by proper City officials or employees. Subd. 2. Snowy Weather. A. Between November 15th and April 1st, inclusive, parking is prohibited on the West and South sides of Streets or Avenues on odd - numbered days for the day beginning at 2:00 o'clock A.M. and until 6:00 o'clock A.M.; and on the East and North sides of Streets or Avenues on the even - numbered days for the day beginning at 2:00 o'clock A.M. and until 6:00 o'clock A.M. page revised in 1995 845 001 S)49)�0 vPee §9.50 B. Between November 15th and April 1st, inclusive, parking is prohibited on both sides of Second Avenue between Sommerville Street and Naumkeag Street. C. The parking restrictions described in this subdivision will be in effect and enforced when weather conditions warrant plowing and shall continue in eff ect until the same roadway has been plowed or removed to the full width of the roadway thereon. - Subd 3 Parking Hours in the Central Business District, There shall be no parking on the following streets in the Central Business District between 2:00 o'clock A.M. and 6:00 o'clock A.M.,to -wit: Second Avenue, First Avenue and Levee Drive between Sommerville and Fuller Street and Lewis Street, Holmes Street and Fuller Street between Second Avenue and Levee Drive. Subd 4 Snow on Public Right -of -Way. No snow shall be removed from private property and subsequently deposited on public right -of -way such as, but not limited to, streets and alleys. Subd. 5. Hardship. Upon showing of undue hardship in individual cases, the Council may grant modification or exemption from the above upon notifying the City Engineer, the Street Department and the Police Department. Subd. 6. Unlawful Act. It is unlawful to park in violation of this Section. Subd. 7. Towing. Persons in violation of the parking restrictions outlined in this Section and parking on designated snow emergency routes, shall be tagged and towed at their own expense. In areas not designated as snow emergency routes, persons in violation shall initially be tagged and shall have four hours from the time the citation is issued to remove their vehicle or be subject to tow at their own expense. Subd. 8. Snow Emergency Routes. The following streets shall be designated as snow emergency routes: Fourth Ave. from Fuller St. to County Road 83 Harrison St. from Third Ave. to Sixth Ave. Fuller St. from Rrst Ave. to Fourth Ave. and Sixth Ave. to Trunk Highway 169 Market St. from First Ave. to Tenth Ave. Scott St. from First Ave. to Sixth Ave. Shakopee Ave. from Tenth Ave. to Eleventh Ave. Sixth Ave. from Holmes St. to Tenth Ave. Spencer St. from First Ave. to Tenth Ave. Tenth Ave. from County Road 69 to Shakopee Ave. Third Ave. from Harrison St. to Fuller St. Twelfth Ave. from Adams St. to Taylor St. Vierling Drive from 12th Avenue to Fuller Street Vierling Drive from County Road 15 to Taylor St. Preserve Trail, from C.R. 18 to Stagecoach Road Stagecoach Road, from Preserve Trail to C.R. 101 Southbridge Parkway, from C.R. 18 to Windsor Lane 17th Avenue, from Weston Lane to 1 /2 Mile East of Sarazin Street Taylor St. from Vierling Drive to 12th Ave. Holmes St. from 4th Ave. to 6th Ave. 12th Ave. from Vierling Drive to Valley Park Drive page revised in 1999 E. r 08 -24 -01 09:38 From- KENNEDY & GRAVEN +6123379370 T -336 P -02/05 F -451 Richfield City Code 1305.13 (Rev. 1996) (h) when a police officer or other agent authorized by the citg of Richfield has probable cause to believe that the vehicle is stolen or lacks proper registration: or 0 08 -29 -01 09:38 From- KENNEDY d GRAVEN Robbinsdale City Code +6123379310 T -336 P.03/05 F -451 1305.07 (Rev. 1997) 1305.07. Parking in congested zones Subdivision 1. General rule It is unlawful to park a vehicle or permit it to stand upon a street in a congested zone for a period of time longer than one hour during the hours between 8100 o'clock a.m. and 6100 o'clock p.m. Subd. 2. Congested zones It is unlawful to park a vehicle or permit it to stand upon a street which has been designated a one hour zone for more than one hour. When a one hour zone is in an area in which parking by resident permit pursuant to subsection 1305.15. the one hour restriction does not apply to vehicles bearing resident permits, but allows non - permitted vehicles to remain on the street for not more than one hour. 1305.09. Restricted parking Subdivision I. Four hour rule Except as otherwise provided in this code, no person in charge of a vehicle may park or permit the vehicle to stand upon a highway, street or alley in the city or on property owned or leased by the city, for more than four consecutive hours between the hours of 12 o °clock a.m. and 8 o'clock a.m. nor for more than six consecutive hours at any time. Subd. 2. Trucks In an industrial, commercial, or multiple dwelling area where off - street parking area or truck standing spaces are provided, those vehicles must use the designated area for parking, loading or unloading. Subd. 3. Snow After a snowfall of at least two inches, parking is prohibited on public streets. highways, and alleys in the city and on property owned or leased by the city. Parking may not resume on a street, highway or alley until it has been plowed and the snow removed to the curb line. Parking may not be resumed on any individual property owned or leased by the city until the property has been plowed to the perimeters thereof. (Amended, Ord. No. 91- 14, Sec. 1) 1305.10. (Added, Ord. No. 96 -10) Prohibited parking Subdivision I. Notwithstanding any provision in this section to the contrary, the parking of any truck - tractor, semi - trailer, truck tactor' and Simi- trailer combination on commercially zoned private property is prohibited except in the following circumstances (a) where such parking is necessary in connection With construction activity which is actually occurring on the property pursuant to a valid and current building permit; (b) for a period of up to 12 hours, or such longer time as permitted in writing by the police chief, where such parking is for the purpose of unloading or loading materials, supplies or inventory to be used in connection with the business activity occurring on the property; but not for the purpose of storage of such materials, or inventory pending sale; (c) where such vehicles are actually being offered for sale or lease by the business located on the property, but only if such sale or lease activity is permitted by this code; 08-2.9 -01 09:39 From- KENNEDY & GRAVEN +6123379310 -- T-336 P.04/05 F-451 (2) Commercial vehicles described above shall include but are not limited to buses, dump trucks. tow trucks, truck-tractors, step vans, cube vans, delivery trucks and the like. (B) Commercial vehicles, trailers, farm vehicles, farm equipment, and construction equipment are subject to all other provisions of this ordinance; however, the prohibitions of This section do not apply to the following: (1) Commercial vehicles that are actually in the process of being loaded or unloaded in the due course of business. (2) Commercial vehicles that are directly ancillary to construction and parked within 1,000 feet of the related construction site. (3) Vehicles licensed with disability plates, or displaying a disability parking certificate. (4) One -ton passenger vans used solely for transporting persons. (5) Vehicles with Minnesota license plates carrying a designation of "SB" (school bus). ('72 Code, § 725:32) (Ord. 1993 -720, passed 5- 24 -93) Penalty, see § 10.99 FIRMENdam It is unlawful, except for a physician on an emergency call, to park or leave a vehicle on a street when there is more than two inches of snow on the street and snow is falling or has fallen within the previous 24 hours or snow is blowing or has been blowing within the previous 24 hours. (`72 Code, § 725:33) Penalty, see § 10.99 It is unlawful to park a vehicle upon a roadway for the principal purpose of displaying The vehicle for sale.' washing, greasing or repairing the vehicle except repairs necessitated by an emergency. ('72 Code, § 725:36) Penalty, see § 10.99 17 08 -a -01 09:39 From- KENNEDY & GRAVEN Crystal City Code +61MT9310 T -335 P.05/05 F -451 1310.05, Suba. 6 (Rev. 1999) Subd. 6. angle pakina Angle parking is prohibited on public streets or alleys within the city_ Subd. 7. Snow em= Dcy After a snowfsll of at least 1 -1/2 inches in the city, parking is prohibited on public streets and alleys unul and after the street or alley has been plowed and the snow removed to the curb line. Subd 8. City narkil2&Jot It is unlawful to park a truck in the city parking lot 4oining Becker Park 1310.07. PWJaa timer Subdivision 1. ��n_eral cute A vehicle may not be parked within the city on a public street or alley Detween the hours of 3.00 am. and 6:00 am. on any day. A vehicle, except a governmental vehicle, may not be parked in any -city- owned or operated parking lot between the hours of 3.00 am. and 6:00 a.m. on any day. A truck may not be parked on any public street, avenue, alley, or otner public way for a continuous penod of more than two hours unless actually eneazed in loading or unloading in the duc course of husincs�,. For purposes of Mis section, the term "truck" means a self - propelled motor vehicle not operated on rails, having capacity of one ana one - half tons or more, or any tractor or trader or combination thereof; and the term "governmental vehicle" ineana (a) a vehicle owned or controlled by the federal government. the state, or any political subdivision or instrumentality thereof, ana (b) a vehicle owned or controlled by an employee of the city or any joint powers organization of which the city is a member. (Amended, Ord. No. 99 -11. Sec 1) Sahel. 2 p rmjg temporary pe�nnus During tnt period from April l to November 30 and on legal holidays and the days preceding and following legal holidays, the city manager is authorized to issue temporary perrrus for the parking of a vehicle on a, street between Lie hours of 3:00 am. to 6:0u a.m. when in the manager's judgment special circumstances exist justifying the issuance of the temporary permit and the purposes of this section will not be impaired thereby. The permit is to be issued for a specific motor vehicle at a specific residential dwelling unit and must be prominently displayed in the interior of the vehicle. A temporary permit issued under this subsection is not transferable to another vehicle. One temporary permit may be issued under this subsection without a fee. The fee for the issuance of additional temporary permits under this subsection is set by appendix IV. For purposes of this subdivision, the term ''legal holiday' means: New Years Day. Martin Luther King Day, Presidents' Day, Mcmcnal Day, Independence Day, Columbus Day, Veterans' Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. (Amended, Ord. No. 95 -8, Sec. 1) Subd. 3. Cicy narld tg ots tempo�arlr t>er ts . The city manager is authorized to issue temporary permits for the parking of a vehicle in a city owned or operated parking lot between the hours of 3:00 am. to 6.00 a.m. when in the manager's judgment special circumstances exist justirying the issuance of the temporary pertrut and the purposes of this section will not be impaired thereby. The pernut is to be issued for a specific motor vehicle and must be prorrunently displayed in the interior of the vehicle. A temporary permit issued under this subsection is not transferable to another vehicle. One temporary permit may be issued under This subsection without a fee. The fee for the issuance of additional temporary permits under this _subsection is set by Appendix N. (Added, Ord. Nu. 99 -11, Sec 2) 1'/ AUG -29 -2001 14 =56 CITY OF HASTINGS (:::�D 6514377292 P.01/21 TOTAL P.01 08/29/01 WED 14:57 FAX 6124474263 �klo P2 L i� CITY OF PRIOR LAKE M o t or Vehicles and Traffic ➢ Within fifty feet (50') of the nearest rail of a railroad crossing. Within ten feet (10') feet of the opposite the entrance to any fire station, and, on the side of a street within seventy five feet (75') of said entrance when properly sign posted. - ➢ Alongside or opposite any street excavation or obstruction when suc stopping, standing or parking would. obstruct traffic. ➢ On the roadway side of any vehicle stopped or parked at the edge or curb of a street ➢ Upon any bridge or other elevated Wucture upon a highway, except as otherwise provided by ordinance of the City. ➢ At any place where official signs prohibit stopping Whenever a no parking sign is properly displayed. In areas where there is curbing, and when such curbing adjacent to the roadway is painted yellow. ear officer with ➢ On a street, when directed to proceed by any P authority to direct traffic. ➢ On any street for the purpose of displaying it for sale. ➢ On any street in any one place for a longer continuous period than forty eight (48) hours. On any: street in the City between the f until o 'clock ((2 50 ®Atha and six o'clock (6:00) A.M. from Nov ember following year. 4 be ranted by the Police Chief for a one day period with advance A variance may 9 notification from any individual residing within the City. 04: Snow r"en R °"ulations: In order to expedite the prompt and efficient 901.3 y arson to stop, removal of snow from the stree of the City, on unlawful Public street within the City stand or park any vehicle or permit it to stand between the hours of two o'clock (2:00) A.M. and six o'clock (6:00) A.M. after a during which has been an accumulation of continuous or intermittent snowfall nd the snow has been plowed two inches (2") or more of snow on any street, an or removed to the full width of the street. Any motor vehicles parked in violation of this subsection may be towed pursuant to Minne eanor sh punishable by a fine of Violation of this subsection shall be a petty twenty five dollars {$25.00). 901.305: n - Commercial Vehicles: (1) Definition: "Commercial motor vehicle" and/or alraillc��ense shall design primarily be defined as a vehicle with motive power, and /or trailer, com o designed for carrying a trailer as for the transportation of people or property, previously defined. ntial Street: It shall be unlawful for any person to park any (2) parking on Reside City of Prior Lake 901 /p3 r If i The Council may, by resolution, establish loading zones to be used for the specific purpose of loading or unloading merchandise from a commercial vehicle or vehicles temporarily being utilized in the transport of merchandise. Such loading zones shall be installed by order of the City Manager where in the judgment of the Council a commercial loading zone is justified and duly sign-posted- SECTION 8.12. UNATTENDED VEHICLE Subd. 1. It is unlawful for any person to leave a motor vehicle unattended while the engine is running. Subd. 2. It is unlawful for any person to leave a motor vehicle unattended with the key in the ignition provided, however, that public road maintenance or public safety emergency equipment, which by its nature is difficult to restart, may be kept running if the vehicle is secured and locked so as to prevent access to its driving controls by the public. If the ignition is secured by a key, such key shall be removed from the vehicle_ SECTION 8.13. VEHICLE REPAIR ON STREET. It is unlawful for any person to service, repair, assemble or dismantle any vehicle parked upon a street or attempt to do so except to service such vehicle with motor fuel or to provide emergency repairs thereon but in no event for more than twenty-four (24) hours. SECTION 8.14. PARKING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADVERTISING OR SELLING VEHICLE It is unlawful for any person to park a vehicle on any street for the purpose of advertising such vehicle for sale. SECTION 8.15. SNOW ACCUMULATION. It is unlawful for any person to park a vehicle on any street after a continuous or intermittent snowfall during which there has been an accumulation of two (2) inches or more of snow on any street and until the same has been plowed or removed to the full width of the roadway thereon. Source: City Code Effective Date: 9 -17 -82 SECTION 8.16. PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED PARKING. Subd. 1. Statutory parking privileges for physically handicapped shall be strictly observed and enforced. All handicapped parking signs are to be permanently affixed. The handicapped parking sign shall be approximately 18" x 24" or larger with a blue background and white letters bearing the handicapped insignia and shall state - HANDICAPPED PARKING - STATE PERMIT REQUIRED - POLICE WILL ENFORCE. Police officers are authorized to tag vehicles on either private or public property in violation of such statutory privileges. Police officers are also authorized to tag any vehicles blocking access to handicapped parking spaces even though they are not actually parking in the space. Subd. 2 _ It is unlawful for any person, whether or not physically handicapped, to stop, park, or leave standing a motor vehicle (1) in a sign - posted fire lane at any time or (2) in lanes where and during such hours as parking is prohibited to accommodate heavy traffic during morning and afternoon rush hours. Source: Ordinance No. 69-84 Effective Date: 4-5 -84 SECTION 8.17. PARKING ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT CONSENT. It is a misdemeanor to park or abandon a motor vehicle on the property of another or upon an area developed as an 8 -5 E �iryW o CD n CD ^� �. s r: a o 't3 G. --� 0 G. CD a. n � G � c O a. O O _ C 00 CD < A� 0 v� y CD CD CD O O CD v� 0.0 `r3 -' 't9 ✓ r =+ O < to QQ = x � '; =' = o A� F� O o w cD o v' 0 a- v� CD r .'T C C O -+ CD O UQ C Q O CD CD CD 0 CD CD O CD CD C - °, - � < a< C.. w C n a. ,� Ora T . O E3 (� r A+ CD ^ = CD O C CD CD ° C9 CD n .�+ O C C r -- - 0 , m S C7 r. CD r o , C CD = c CD CD C C ma„ QQ a C O O re G ZD - • r c a. r h (D n CD cn ; (D „O CD � A Cn m A, << O O 'c3 cn CD n V .+ O QC = O O -=' y. `CS CD O ~ � O CD ►t C CD '� �- `C CD C •c _"S' CD Q -• CD CD CD °-s CD G " n O CD < + cn cD rr cn cD \ C. cn C cn m C p cn X 00 (�D O O (iD UG N �? C• r BCD �_ O t ° CD A.. '' �"1 C D O CD '"' �_ a+ AV CD < ^� ° CD _; p O - � [I] CD ✓ -S TS Zy C (D O < O O r .� Q - Z < <n O n CD v ' w y C� O C. cn ^' CD -- CD f- _ r� te• ES OG r Cp v ... C a r O ✓ ° CD CA CD `LS C C r '- +- / oa�• J o o�.0CCD -z °ate Q QcnZD ao o+� '� G fD v� y CD r. S -- r O p O CD o CD C C� ,; O CD •' ac p ti � CD a; CD i Q M CD r Q7 ' = = = -$ CD CD O .= + < O O `rS a. t CD °Q� �oo�� C p�GC 2 os� :��o�G' cDO En CD ° o CD U?.o `C . �p x° ° O a ° vc C C ''' �••t ✓ CD ✓ r vi A°7 C7 CS C .-+ -, A% O r N CD n p .ter.. 0 � � a. � �. y � .:, � O 't3 CD � :5 O r O C z O CD C - 6, 0 _ ^t C CD CD r a. < O .p� CD < O O CD V r O� - C C) n CD O C S. Q m Q A� `O C7 CD -n O O A) a CD -s r r O - Q CD 00 C `t C - o =r p O CD `C CD n O D Cj v CD C7 o ✓ C� O CD Do N y UV m CD O O CD rn CD < ' < C 0 C " - h C "C `CS < CD to CCDD CD O CD O . r C . ,� O C -t . CA E9 Q CD 0 U3 CD C . � C CAD cr = CD e-. A) '.:.'1 (n -"' 0 E, < X C" a. CD a r N cD O C C �_ O O OQ p 20 ° ~s �' c�i � � �G (D p c O O O �_ : "1 AD C r � CO 11 c; r C C C O CD CD r r Cl" -t p7 (.A CD p ° CD aka- o C� 0CD �o�• ° n' � o ocD C 0 �� cDacD o m�oo� <o�n CD cD('D - ' <o `off < �� `.°� X� o c CD D � (D < a. � �D m ° CD �� a O � ch O< = (D < O a- to — = - a. � O C r CD CD CD pD _ `�'� s C O cD < C ' X - 2 C O O O CD CD . CD C+ < fD C/1 . C -1 C O s + n h O " CD p A £' C CD O Q' 0 . ti CD ^t CD • > 0 = r0 CD CD r O n 4 O v O i < C) 0 CD CD CD CD O CD ° r to CD �. ° C1 O �- O • t r CD C r O CD •-t cn CD -1 ) .�... Ar ,•.. �� O O �O O aO a- o ��� O n y �' CD CO M (D 'C3 I C C7 C�j r O A� O_ • (D X" QQ < < C CD O n C (D y a < a . < �. rn CD CD C� CD t� CD X O ?� O CD r (D O O' CD QO O O co C sy cD s o -s 00 13 SflV C_ b Truck parking its prohibited on 123rd Street from Ottawa Avenue to Natchez Avenue except between the hours of six lock (6:00) A.M. and ten o'clock (10:00) P-m., during which tune truck parking is permitted on the north side of 123rd St=reet from Ottawa Avenue to Natchez Avenue, and on that pc(rtion of. the South side of 123rd Street one hundred and eleven feet (111') east from Ottawa Avenue. r B. Truck Zones and.Loading Zones: 1. Zorfes are Hareby Established, Signs Posted: The City Council may, I resolution, establish spaces in streets as loading zones or truck 2� The hours of eight o'clock (8:00) A.M. to Six o'clock (6:00) j_.M. of any day except Sundays, New Year's Day, Memorial Day, July 4,;= Labor Dayz Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day, or Such other time aCthe City Council may specify in the resolution establishing the zori shall be the loading zone or truck zone hours. The Public :storks Iirector -shall mark each such zone by appropriate signs. 2. Parking Restrictions: a Truck Zones: During truck zone hours, no person shall skl,op, stand cr . park any vehicle except a truck in a truck Vine. No person shall stop, stand or park a truck in a truck zone during truck zone hours except to receive or discharge p or freight and then only for a period of no longer tj�an is necess for the purpose. b`M Loading Zone:. During loading zone hours, no person shall sav, stand or park any vehicle in a loading zone except to r1%ceive or discharge passengers or freight and then only for a period no longer than necessary for the purpose. No person s +Zell occupy "a loading zone with a vehicle other than a truck f;r more than five (5) minutes during such hours. 3 Property " owner Initiative: Any person desiring the e tab,ishment of a loading zone or truck zone abutting premises occupied "by him /her shall make written application oherefor.:to the City Council. If th® Council grants the request; the proper City officer shall bill the applicant for the estimated coat of placing signs and of painting the curb. t lien the , amount is paid to the City Treasurer, the Public Trtbrks Director shall install the necessary signs and paint the C. i. mi. -Trailers - No person shall allow a semi - trailer to stand d be parked on any public parking lot between twelve o'clock 412:00) midnight and eight o'clock (8:00) A.M., except in an - Jtergency in order to change tractors. 6-2-8: PAINING DURING SNOW REMVAL A. ProhitS.ted Parking: No person shall park any motor vehicle in an unplow :fid area of :any.street or road for a period of forty.eight (48) [ 30VAVS �0 AiIo : Q juaS ��, aRpj X�a� .1F.:bl �0 /8Z /BO •999ZZ88Z19 S14 V hours After a Ewo inch (2 ") or more snowfall until the snowplowing �^ is coaypleted in the street, road or area involved_- B. Removal of Vehicle, Redemption: If motor vehicles have been parked to such a snow storm, they shall promptly be removed by owner 'br person having control over such vehicle upon accumulation of twcr or more inches (2 of enowf all and any motor vehicle parked in violation of this Section may be removed, without notice to the owner, to any parking lot or garage. designated by the City Council and such vehicle may be redeemed by the owner only upon paying the cost of removing, touring and storage to any party having the claim for services rendered in the removing, towing and storing of said motor ;vehicle. For purposes of this Section, any person who operates or allows smother to operate his vehicle in the public roads pr streets of the City shall be deemed to have consented to the removal and storage of said vehicle under the terms of this Sectidh, and consent shall extend to the storage thereof without liability for 4Lny damage to such vehicle or its contents while being removdKi or so stored. C. Lien, - =Sale of Vehicle: All fines and costs levied under this Section, including the cost of removal and storage, shall be a lien upon the vehicle in question and if not paid within fifteen (15) days # #ollowing the removal of such vehicle and the imposition of fines In the event of prosecution, the City may sell the property in the mz.�nner provided by Section 4 -4 -4 of the Savage City Code. 6 -2 -9: SIGNS POSTEDa The Public Works Director shall cause signs to be posted in all areas where parking is limited or prohibitid, indicating such limitations or prohibitions. 6 -2 -10: TMPO ID OF ILL$GALLY P VEHICLES. Any police officer may remove a vehicle from a street to a garage or any othc6r place - of safety when the vehicle is left unattended and constituted.; an obstruction to traffic or hinders snow removal or street improvement or maintenance operations. Such vehicle shall not be :fees'for towing and storage are paid. released until the 6 -2 -11. yip 'PI4N� The presence of any motor vehicle on any street when standing or parked in violation of this Chapter is Prima facie evidence that the registered owner of the vehicle committed or authorized the commission of the violation. Unless otherwise )pecifiaEi any violation of this Section shall be a petty misdemeanor 1 z I S F/e a6ed`•EZ6# tai `8E =V1 L0 /8Z /80 `- 9SHZZ88ZL9 3JdnGS _�0 AlIO :Aq ;uaS O 16 `O w - Oc cD to 00 N ° cn � J a� O Z o O 0 CD C) CAD y CD Z = - C1 _ 0 CD CD CD p B - CD CD -- = O C CD C y `CS CD CD CD -t 0 ul A� R O O O (� -r �p O n C] tD 'C3 O" -) - O+ n D CAD O OC O QQ C O ^Q C P� CD m x' 0 CAD n p� r O C- �� O Z CD = m k v O CD C D �' AD W ® � ' CD QC CD . . CD T t d 0 L/1 C CD S A: CD CD _ CD Sy ^ O p h AD a. w ® , V a CD r p v CD O CD G per. .+ n CD CD < CD < Cl. CD CD CE TS r to p O CS O O p a. Z O p� CD O CD CL s O CL n rn CD 0 ro CD CD AD N N �' CD cn „ s (D m a -cs ° Gn n c< O< CD N `a 00 � p n CA C O Z5 C D CCD O UG 0 O CD An CD a. O p ' C O •`- Q CD cn Cl. CD O C A: Qp O CD p. O a' = -1 -c O t� CD � CD pD � • p O 16 `O w - Oc cD to 00 N ° � J O 16 B 00 N �D O UC O C\ O J .y rA A > c 0 Q C o r^ << p < n D p O CD O 00 0 0 CD 1 10 � O •-•' � ' - � O A C dq =r cD E. O 7 CD _ CL OC - n O CD y � a �p • CD 0 r \O C) "a cn p O O u cn CD ^' o = a 0 ` Aj m A En CD 0 r Q. O. O_ �° CD O O cn U2 v � � `C C UC O C\ O J .y > c Q 00 � O •-•' R. G' ' - � O A C dq 7 CD _ CL OC CD y � a C)C • *-0 r \O (D CD .-. A O CD r Q. O. O_ CD v � � x CD cD C i"� O CD C O CD n -+ -� CD CD UC O C\ O J .y Ion U P Ing so as to Lmpeft Snow removal prohibited. No vehicle shall be operated or parked In a manner or place that obstructs or Impedes the City Street Department In clearing or removing snow from the City streets, alleys or parking lots. (Ord. No. 183, Sec. 1,1/8/ During the period of November 1st to April 1st inclusive, parking on the streets Of the City Of Chaska shall be permitted as follows: Whenever snow accumulates on the City streets to a depth necesst2ting plowing and removal operations, andor whenever a snow emergency has been declared to exist by the announcement of same by the Mayor or his designated representative on a local radio station Chapter 14, Page 5 )g AUG -30 -2001 08 51 AM CHASKA MKCPL SERVICES 612 448 7356 P.03 Sect ion 99. Towing away of vehicles in violation at division. (a) In addltion to any fine as set forth in Section 013(a) of Chapter 1, any vehicle which shall be parked or standing in violation of this division may be summarily removed without notice to the owner or operator by officers of the City Police Department or by persons. employed or designated by them, and stored in any appropriate place. All necessary costs and expense of towing, removing and storage of such vehicles shall be first paid to the person or persons designated by the Police Department by the persons claiming the vehicles before release of same. (b) The City, its agent or its employees, shall not be responsible for any damage to such vehicles .removed in accordance with the provisions of this division. (Ord. No. 1133, Sec. 6, 116/69) r -• • im Section 40. Purpose- in order to preserve civic beauty, to assure public health, safety, and welfare by preventing congestion and traffic hazards, to prevent unauthorized use and trespass on vacant property, and to prevent damage and erosion problems associated with oft -road vehicle travel on unimproved surfaces, It Is necessary to regulate the Individual sales of vehicles within the City. Section 41. Display for sale prohibitad. No person, business, assouabon or corporation shall store, display or park, or allow the storage, display or pGUkinp of an Individual vehicle for the oo a splaying sign Indicating that i a veh�fc ind is i f c o ' sale. phone number, address, or other identifying information consignment, lease, trade or exchange as follows: (a) Upon any public right -of -way, easement or any other public property; or Chapter 14, Page 6 19 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum To: From: Date: Subject: Introduction: Honorable Mayor, City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator Dan Hughes, Chief of Police August 29, 2001 2001 -2002 D.A.R.E. Educational Services Agreement Cn 'U. The Police Department is seeking approval of the 2001 -2002 D.A.R.E. Educational Services Agreement between Independent School District 720 and the City of Shakopee. Background: State Statute allows school districts to levy a tax for every resident of the school district for the purposes of funding drug education programs within the district. This levy is commonly referred to as the D.A.R.E. tax. Independent School District 720 elected to levy the D.A.R.E. tax a number of years ago. In past years the District and Department have used the funds to subsidize many of the programs the Department conducts in the schools. D.A.R.E.(Drug Abuse Resistance Education), G.R.E.A.T. (Gang Resistance Education And Training), Officer Friendly, Halloween Safety, and bike safety are examples of programs we plan to provide in the schools during the 2001 -2002 school year. These programs coupled with numerous hours of liaison activity should have a direct positive impact on our youth and their relationship with the police. Council approved a similar agreement for the 2000 -2001 school year. Budget Impact: The agreement identifies $31,802.00 as the amount the School District determined as available to pay the City for services during the 2001 -2002 school year. It is anticipated this amount will grow proportionately as the City and District population increase. The District is not requesting additional services from the Police Department for the term of this agreement. Action Requested: If Council concurs, they should, pass a motion authorizing the appropriate City officials to enter into the D.A.R.E. Educational Services Agreement between Independent School District 720 and the City of Shakopee for the 2001 -2002 school year. D.A.R.E and Educational Services Agreement Independent School District 720 and the City of Shakopee This Agreement is made and entered into the day and year set forth below, by and between Independent School District No. 720 (hereinafter "School District: ") and the City of Shakopee (hereinafter "City"). The parties enter into this Agreement pursuant to Minnesota Statute 126C.44. For purposes of this agreement, the School District's participating elementary schools are, Pearson, Sweeney and Sunpath. For purposes of this agreement, the School District's participating secondary schools are the Shakopee Junior High and the Shakopee Senior High. The parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The City agrees to provide a state certified police officer, certified as a D.A.R.E. instructor, to Instruct the D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) program in the School District's elementary schools. 2. The City agrees to provide a state certified police officer in each of the School District's elementary schools for the purposes of educational programming (i.e.: Officer Friendly, Halloween safety, bicycle safety). 3. The City agrees to have an officer available to the District's elementary schools on an "on call" basis for police liaison services. These police liaison services shall include, but not be limited to, prevention of delinquency, protection of life and property, and law enforcement. 4. The parties agree that the police officers assigned to provide educational and police liaison services in the schools are employees of the City and its Police Department. The officers shall operate under the administration and supervision of the police department, but will work in cooperation with school administrators to achieve mutually agreed goals for the police department, school and students. 5. The City agrees to provide approximately sixty percent (60 %), of an officer's annual work hours in services to the School District. In return the School District agrees to pay the City 531.802.00 for these services. The payment shall be made upon receipt of an invoice from the City. 6. This Agreement is effective for the 2001 -2002 school year. This Agreement dated this day of Board Chair, Anne Tuttle Superintendent, Jon McBroom Mayor, Jon Brekke 2001. City Administrator, Mark McNeill Police Chief, Dan Hughes City Clerk, Judith Cox ® a CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum Coi TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director SUBJ: Fire Relief Association By -laws DATE: August 29, 2001 Introduction The Fire Relief Association (FRA) is proposing changes to the by -laws that require Council action because additional city contributions are required. Background In 1995, the by -laws were changed to have the pension benefit level being based on the Stanton wage survey for the next five years. That time has passed. For five years starting in 2001, the new benefit level would be an incremental increase of about 15% per year to $7,500 per year of service, which is the current state maximum. This was reviewed with council in June and approved with the contingency that the council would be able to do so under the levy limit. There are other minor changes to the by -laws, most notably is the requirement that a member attend 35% of the fire calls /drills to continue to be a member of the association. The FRA has the authority to change the by -laws and benefit level. When the new benefit level requires an increase in the city contribution, council must approve of the change. The City Attorney has reviewed the revisions. Action Offer Resolution Number 5571, A Resolution Approving the By -Laws Of The Shakopee Fire Department Relief Association, and move its adoption. regg Voxland Finance Director g: \finance \docs \firedept RESOLUTION NO. 5571 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE BY -LAWS OF THE SHAKOPEE FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, the Shakopee Fire Department Relief Association has rewritten it By -laws and has submitted them to the City Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, that the attached by -laws of the Shakopee Fire Department Relief Association, consisting of ten articles, and dated June 24, 2001 are hereby approved. Be It Further Resolved that Resolution Number 4246 and previous by -laws are hereby superseded. Adopted in City of Shakopee, September 2001- session of the City Council of the Minnesota held this day of Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk • �' - � • l Benefit levels Approved by the Shakopee City Council , 2001 Approved by the Shakopee City Council July /August F 2001 CHANGE: Delete all references to $3.00 dues and replace with annual dues. Reason; dues amount keep changing CHANGE: Change annual meeting to be in April or May, this meeting will be for the previous year, Del, third Monday in December. Reason: annual reports our done in April or May, have more reports and records. ADD: The board can require an independent medical exam at the expense of the Relief Association and withhold payments to the member until the findings of the exam are complete. Reason: make sure medical leaves our ligament CHANGE: Change vested amount to 5 years from 10 Reason, members wanted this, state statue allows it to be at 5 years, can be higher ADD /CHANGE: Early vested and deferred members earn an annual rate of 5 %. This is retro active and covers all members presently (6- 2001)on early and deferred rolls for all years they have been on the pension rolls Reason, presently bylaws state the rate of return earned by the fund up to 5% max. 5% annually would make it easier and fairer. 5% is state max allowed DELETE: Delete, requirements that early vested and deferred members pay dues. Reason, they can trot collect for what the dues go for. The old thought is this way we could keep tract of inactive members, we have their money, they will contact us. Not worth the hassle of collecting. DELETE: Delete, benefit formula Reason, this out dated, riot being used anymore. DELETE: Delete. exception to investment policy regarding limited partnerships Reason, limited partnership has been sold DELETE assets allocation Reason, this is decided by the Relief Board and can change. The investment fiend policy outlines what can and can not be used as tools of investment. ADD: Add, 35% call requirement, members will be paid for years of service in which they met or they exceed the 35% call requirement. Any member not meeting the 35% requirement for 2 or more years in a row will be paid the benefit level which was in force 2 years or more, the amount will be equal to the years they did not make the 35% requirement in a row, of their separation date. Reason, city passed benefit increases based on a 35% call requirement. The Relief Officers offered this bu >ed on survey results of members and discussion at a prior meeting. PAGE Definitions............................. ............................... 3 3 ARTICLE I: Objectives ................... ............................... ARTICLE II: Organization ................. .............................. ARTICLE III: Elections and Appointments . ............................... 4 ARTICLE IV: Duties and Responsibilities . ............................... 5 10 ARTICLE V: Qualifications .............. ............................... ARTICLE VI: Reinstatements, Impeachments, Dismissals .................. 12 13 ARTICLE VII: Meeting Procedures ........ ............................... 14 ARTICLE unds.................... ............................... VIII: Funds. .................................................. 16 ARTICLE IX: Benefits -- -- -- -- ------------- •------ •- ••-•--•-•---- • -• -•• ARTICLE X: By -Law Alterations and Amendments .......................... 20 ATTACHMENT A: Funds Policy / Per Year of Service------ ---------- - - - - -- 21 2 DEFINITIONS 1. As used in this document, "The Association" shall refer to the Shakopee Fire Department Relief Association. 2. As used in this document, "The President" shall refer to the President of the Shakopee Fire Department Relief Association. 3. As used in this document, "The Vice President" shall refer to the Vice President of the Shakopee Fire Department Relief Association. 4. As used in this document, "The Secretary" shall refer to the Secretary of the Shakopee Fire Department Relief Association. S. As used in this document, "The Treasurer" shall refer to the Treasurer of the Shakopee Fire Department Relief Association. 6. As used in this document, "The Trustees" shall refer to the Trustees of the Shakopee Fire Department Relief Association. 7. As used in this document, "The Board" shall refer to the Board of Trustees of the Shakopee Fire Department Relief Association. 8. As used in this document,-"Member" shall refer to any Shakopee Fire Department Relief Association member in good standing. ARTICLE I Objectives Section 1. This organization shall be known as the Shakopee Fire Department Relief Association. Section 2. The objectives of this organization shall be to: a. provide pension benefits to the members b. provide death benefits to member's spouse, family or appointed beneficiary. C. provide disability benefits to the members. d. provide aid to sick or disabled members or survivors of any deceased members. Section 3. The Shakopee Fire Department Relief Association is a governmental entity that receives and manages public money to provide retirement benefits for individuals providing governmental services of firefighting. 3 ARTICLE II organization Section 1. The Association shall be composed of active members of the Shakopee Fire Department, any members in good standing on the deferred pension roll and any members in good standing on the early vested pension roll. Section 2. There shall be a Board of Trustees composed of the following: a. President b. Vice President C. Secretary d. Treasurer e. Two (2) General Trustees f. Three (3) statutory ex- officio Trustees: 1. Chief of the Shakopee Fire Department 2. Mayor of the City of Shakopee 3. Treasurer of the City of Shakopee Section 3. The order a. b. C. d. e. f. of accountability shall be as follows: President or President Pro Tem Vice President Secretary Treasurer Senior Trustee(s) Junior Trustee(s) Section 4. Special Committees may be formed as deemed necessary by the Association. Section 5. The members on the early vested and deferred pension rolls shall not have voting rights in the business of the Association. ARTICLE III Election and Appointments Section 1. Election of Officers and Trustees shall be held at the annual meeting of the Association. Section 2. The President, Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer, and two General Trustees shall be elected by the membership to serve a three (3) year term on a rotating basis. The terms of the President and a one (1) Trustee shall be concurrent, 4 the terms of the Vice President and Secretary shall be concurrent and the terms of the Treasurer and one (1) Trustee shall be concurrent. Section 3. The Treasurer of the Shakopee Fire Department shall not also serve as the Treasurer of the Shakopee Fire Department Relief Association. Section 4. If a vacancy (other than a vacancy caused by removal for cause of an Officer or Trustee) occurs during the term of any Officer or Trustee, the remaining members of the Board of Trustees shall elect a member of the association to serve for the unexpired term of the vacated position until the next scheduled meeting of the Association. Section 5. If an officer or trustee is removed from office per Article VI, Section 1, his /her replacement, elected at the same special meeting, shall serve out the unexpired term of the removed Officer or Trustee. Section 6. A person who has been properly qualified shall be appointed to membership in the Association by the Board of Trustees. Section 7. All elected Officers, Trustees and Committee Members shall assume their respective positions, duties, and responsibilities after the annual meeting at which they were elected. ARTICLE IV Duties and Responsibilities Section 1. The duties and responsibilities of the Board of Trustees are: a. The Board shall act as trustees with a fiduciary obligation to the members of the Association, to the City of Shakopee, and to the State of Minnesota. b. The Board shall meet at least four (4) times during the year. C. The Board shall prepare modes and plans for the safe and profitable investment of the funds of the Association, and whenever loans or investments are made, to investigate and pass upon the securities offered and to attend to the drawing and execution of the necessary papers. d. The Board shall order an audit of the books and 5 accounts of the Secretary and the Treasurer annually, according to law, and shall submit a written report on the condition of the Association to the members at the annual meeting. e. The Board shall have exclusive control of investments for the Association funds, in conformance with state statutes. f. The Board shall conduct an investigation to determine if an applicant is physically and mentally sound, so as to prevent unwarranted risk of liability of benefits, to the Association. Section 2. The duties and responsibilities of the President are: a. He /she shall call and preside at all Association and Board of Trustee meetings, to preserve order and to decide all points of order that may arise (Roberts Rules of Order Newly Revised Shall Prevail). His /her decisions are subject to an appeal by the members of the Association. b. He /she shall see that all subordinate Officers execute their obligations and duties to the best of their abilities. C. He /she shall countersign all checks issued by the Treasurer and all other Association documents which require his /her signature. d. He /she shall be a member of all committees and shall exercise careful supervision over the affairs of the Association. e. He /she shall enforce the due observance of Minnesota State Statutes, the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the Association. f. He /she shall receive such salary as may be fixed by the Board of Trustees, subject to approval of the Association, and payable from the Special Fund of the Association. g. He /she shall be an active member of the Shakopee Fire Department. h. He /she shall obey all laws pertaining to the Association. 0 Section 3. The duties and responsibilities of the Vice President are: a. He /she shall assume the duties of the President in his /her absence. 1. In the absence of both the President and Vice President it shall be the duty of the Association to elect a President pro tem., who shall perform the duties incident to the office. b. He /she shall sign all Association documents which require his /her signature. C. He /she shall oversee the functions of all committees. He /she shall also, if necessary, assume responsibility for the completion of these committees responsibilities. d. He /she shall be present, if possible, at all association functions. e. He /she shall be an active member of the Shakopee Fire Department. f. He /she shall obey all laws pertaining to the Association. Section 4 The duties and responsibilities of the Secretary a. He /she shall keep a true and accurate record of the proceeding of all meetings of the Association and of the Board of Trustees. b. He /she shall keep a correct record of all amendments, alterations and additions to the bylaws in a separate book from the minute book of the Association. c. He /she shall keep a roll of membership, with the date of joining, resignation, and discharge, leaves of absence, dues and assessments paid and relief or pensions furnished. d. He /she shall prepare all paperwork and attain required signatures for relief benefits due to membership and insure benefits are distributed appropriately. e. He /she shall give notice of all special meetings of the Association and of the Board of Trustees, in accordance with Article VII, Section 2. 7 f. He /she shall send written notice by registered letter of dues due date at least 20 days prior to due date to all persons on the deferred or early vested pension rolls, with notice to be sent to last available address. g. He /she shall receive all monies due the Association and pay the same over to the Treasurer, taking a receipt from the Treasurer. Failure to perform such duties, may result in the impeachment and /or expulsion of the Secretary from the Association. h. He /she shall jointly, with the Treasurer, prepare, process and file all correspondence, reports and statements required by law. I. He /she shall keep all records open for inspection by any member of the Association at reasonable times and places. j. He /she shall receive such salary as may be fixed from time to time by the Board of Trustees, subject to approval by the Association and payable from the Special Fund of the Association. k. He /she shall be present, if possible, at all Association functions. 1. He /she shall be an active member of the Shakopee Fire Department. M. He /she shall obey all laws pertaining to the Association. Section 5 The duties and responsibilities of the Treasurer are: a. He /she shall receive from the Secretary all funds belonging to the Association and hold them subject to the order of the President. While holding said funds, the Treasurer shall invest them in accordance with state law and the Bylaws in order to maximize the return to the Association. The Treasurer shall keep the Board of Trustees informed of investment activity and shall follow the directives of the Board of Trustees for investing. b. He /she shall keep separate and distinct accounts of the Special and General Funds. A C. He /she - shall prepare for each meeting of the Board of Trustees a report of the assets and liabilities of each fund. d. He /she shall prepare for each meeting of the Association a report of the assets and liabilities of each fund and, upon request, provide a copy to any member. e. He /she shall perform the obligations of his /her position, failure to do so may result in the impeachment and /or expulsion of the Treasure from the Association. f. He /she shall deliver to his /her successor in office or any committee appointed by the Board of Trustees to receive the same, all monies, books, papers and other items pertaining to this office immediately upon the expiration of this office. g. He /she shall be bonded, prior to entering office, in an amount equal to 10 percent of the assets of the Association; however, the amount of the bond need not exceed $500,000 unless otherwise required. h. He /she shall prepare and file jointly with the Secretary all reports and statements required by law. I. He /she shall sign all checks and all Association documents which require his /her signature. j. He /she shall receive such salary as may be fixed by the board of trustees, subject to the approval of the Association and payable from the Special Fund of the Association. k. He /she shall be present, if possible, at all Association functions. 1. He /she shall be an active member of the Shakopee Fire Department. m. He /she shall obey all laws pertaining to the Association. Section 6 The duties and responsibilities of the General Trustees are a. He /she shall be present, if possible, at all Association functions. 9 b. He /she shall be an active member of the Shakopee Fire Department. C. He /she shall obey all laws pertaining to the Association. Section 7 The duties and responsibilities of the Active Members are: a. He /she shall be present,if possible, at all Association functions. b. He /she shall pay to the Association annual dues, payable on or before the date of the annual meeting of the Association. C. He /she shall be an active member of the Shakopee Fire Department. Section 8 The duties and responsibilities of the Ex- Officio Members a. He /she shall be present if possible at all Association functions and fulfill the duties of the trustees. ARTICLE V Qualifications Section 1 Qualifications for membership within the Association are: a. He /she shall be a member in good standing of the Shakopee Fire Department. b. He /she shall submit, in writing, an application for membership on a form supplied by the Secretary of the Relief Association. All applications for membership will be reviewed and acted upon by the Board of Trustees, or said committee as appointed, within sixty (60) days from the date of application. C. He /she shall pay an application fee. d. He /she shall pay dues within thirty (30) days of due date. e. He /she shall be a member in good standing on the early vested pension roll or the deferred pension roll. 10 f. Each member shall be entitled matter upon membership. Votil permitted. All votes, unless vote, shall be conducted by a majority cannot be determined Officer in charge of the vote hands. to one (1) vote on any zg by proxy is not specified prior to the voice vote. If a by voice vote, the shall ask for a show of g. No applicant may be excluded except if the member has some medically determinable physical or mental impairment or condition, which would constitute a predictable and unwarranted risk of imposing liability for an ancillary benefit at any age earlier than the minimum age specified for receipt of a service pension. Section 2 Qualifications for membership on the early vested pension roll are: a. He /she shall be a member who has served for more than five (5) years, but less than twenty (20) years, as an active member of the Shakopee Fire Department. Said member may retire from the Shakopee Fire Department and be placed on the early vested pension roll. Section 3 Qualifications for membership on the deferred pension roll a. He /she shall be a member who has served for more than twenty (20) years as an active member of the Shakopee Fire Department, but has not reached the age of fifty (50) years. Said member may retire from the Shakopee Fire Department and be placed on the deferred pension roll. Section 4 Qualifications for membership as a disabled member a. He /she shall be a former member who has been permanently disabled due to injury or sickness while an active member and is no longer in active service with the Shakopee Fire Department. 11 ARTI Re±nstatements, Impeachments, Di-sm-issals Section 1 Impeachments a. A general trustee or officer may be removed from office. b. Cause for such removal shall include, but not be limited to, the breach of duties as set forth in Articles IV and V of these bylaws. C. Any or all elected officers may be removed by a 2/3 vote of voting members present at a special meeting called for that purpose. d. Notice of the meeting at which the impeachment is to be considered shall be given to each member and shall include the purpose of the meeting. e. The officer(s) shall be furnished with a statement of the particular charge(s) at least five (5) days before the special meeting. f. The officer(s) shall be given an opportunity to defend themselves against each charge at the special meeting. Section 2 Dismissals a. Any member of the Association who fails to pay the dues within thirty (30) days of the time when such payment is due, stands suspended from membership and forfeits all rights and benefits thereunder by such non - payment without any action by the Association, or any Association officer. b. Any member who fraudulently claims benefits from, or attempts to defraud, or defrauds the Association may be removed from membership status (dismissed) after a formal hearing by the Board of Trustees to substantiate and clarify the charge(s) against the involved member with a report given at a special meeting called for that purpose. A 2/3 vote of the Associations voting members present at this special meeting is required for dismissal. The charge(s) against said member shall be made in writing and submitted to the Secretary at least thirty (30) days before the formal hearing by the Board of Trustees. A copy of said charge(s) shall be served, via registered 12 mail, upon said member at least thirty (30) days prior to the hearing. The dismissed member shall forfeit all further rights to benefits from the Association. Section 3 Reinstatement a. Any suspended or dismissed member can only be reinstated by submitting their application in writing, presented at a regular or special meeting of the Association, accompanied by a sum of money equal to what he /she would have been required to pay to the Association during the period of suspension had he /she not been suspended, plus a reinstatement fee and upon the favorable vote of 2/3 of the voting members present. If the reinstatement is unsuccessful, the money shall be returned to the applicant. ARTICLE VII Meeting Procedures Section 1 The annual meeting of the Association shall be held in April or May; this meeting will be for the previous year. The place of the meeting shall be designated and may be changed from time to time by the Board of Trustees. Notice of the annual meeting shall be posted at least ten (10) days in advance. Section 2 Special meetings of the Association or the Board of Trustees may be called by the President or 2 members of the Board of Trustees, or 250 of the members of the association. Members or trustees shall be notified by the Secretary of such special meetings and the object of the meeting shall be contained in such notice. This notice shall be given five (5) days prior to the special meeting. Section 3 The meetings of the Board of Trustees shall be held at the registered office of the Association in the city of Shakopee unless noticed for another place within the state as designated by the board. Section 4 A majority of the Board of Trustees then in office, and 60% of the members of the Association shall constitute quorums for the transaction of business at their respective meetings. Section 5 Roberts Rule of Orders, Newly Revised, shall prevail at all Association meetings for matters not specifically covered in these by -laws. 13 Section 6 The Order of Business shall be: a. call to order b. Roll call C. Reading of minutes of previous meeting d. Reading of reports and minutes of Board of Trustees meetings e. Reports of officers f. Nominations for membership g. Reports of special committees h. Unfinished business I. Election of officers and trustees (annual meeting). j. New business k. Adjournment ARTICLE VIII Funds Section 1 The funds received by this Association from dues, donations, fines, application fees, entertainments and other miscellaneous sources shall be kept in the General Fund of the Association and may be disbursed for any purpose reasonably related to the welfare of the Association or its members, as authorized by the majority of the membership or of the Board of Trustees present. Disbursement from the fund shall be in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and Rules and the bylaws of the Association. Section 2 All funds received by the Association from any tax sources, and all funds or property donated or granted to the Association for the benefit of this fund shall be kept in a separate account on the books of the Treasurer known as the Special Fund and shall disbursed for the following purposes only: a. Payment of member's service pension benefits in accordance with these bylaws. b. Payment of ancillary benefits in accordance with these bylaws. C. Administrative expenses as limited by Minnesota law. d. All other expenses of the Association shall be paid out of the General Fund. 14 Section 3 All salaries -paid for administrative purposes will be fixed by the Board of Trustees, subject to the approval of the Association, and payable from the Special Fund of the Association. Section 4 The Board of Trustees shall authorize all disbursements from the Special Fund of the Association. Section 5 No disbursement of funds of this Association shall be made except by checks drawn by the Treasurer and countersigned by the President. Except when issued for salaries, pensions and other fixed charges, the exact amount of which has previously been determined by the Board of Trustees or the members, no check shall be issued until the claim to which it relates has been approved by the Board of Trustees. Section 6 All money belonging to this Association shall be deposited to the credit of this Association in such banks, trust companies, savings and loan associations or other depositories as the Board of Trustees may designate. Funds not needed immediately to pay the expenses of the association may be invested as follows: a. The Board of Trustees shall determine in accordance with MSA 356a.06, Subd. 8, the minimum liquidity required in accordance with the Investment Fund Policy as stated in Attachment B. Such determination shall be documented and retained for three years. b. Remaining funds not subject to clause (a) above may be invested in accordance with MSA 356a.06 with the State Board of Investment, in certificates of deposit, savings accounts, or governmental obligations. All investments shall be in accordance to the investment policy of the Association. C. Funds shall be invested with the criteria of preservation of principal, liquidity, yield and diversification. All investments shall be in accordance with the Investment Fund Policy as stated in Attachment B. 15 ARTICLE IX Benefits Section 1 Application for benefits a. All applications for relief or pension benefits shall be made in writing on forms furnished by the Secretary. b. All applications for disability benefits shall be submitted to the Board of Trustees at a regular or special meeting of the Board. The application shall be accompanied by a certificate from the attending physician or surgeon setting forth the nature of the illness or injury, the cause and duration thereof, the length of time the applicant has been unable to perform the duties of a firefighter, and an estimate of the time at which the applicant will be able to return to his /her duties as a firefighter. C. All applications for pensions shall be submitted to the Board of Trustees at a regular or special meeting of the Board. d. All applications for pensions shall state the age of the applicant, the period(s) of service in and the date of retirement from active duty in the Shakopee Fire Department, the length of time he /she has been a member of the Association, and such other information as the Board of Trustees may require. e. No benefits or pensions shall be paid until an application there of has been approved by a majority vote of the Board of Trustees. The boards decision shall be subject to appeal by the members of the Association. f. No other benefits shall be paid to or on behalf of any member who has received a service pension. g. For purposes of computing benefits of pensions payable under Article IX, sections 2 and 3, a "year of service" shall be defined as a period of 12 full months of active duty in the Shakopee Fire Department, beginning on the date when the member became an active firefighter in the department. If a member's period of active service has not been continuous, parts of years may be added together to compute full years. 16 h. Members will be paid for years of service in which they met or exceeded the 35% call requirement. Years of service below 35% will not count as "years of service." Any member not meeting the 35% requirement for 2 years or more in a row will be paid the benefit level which was in force at the last year they made the 35% requirement. Section 2 Disability Benefits a. The officers and trustees can require an independent medical exam at the expense of the Shakopee Fire Department Relief Association. If a member of this Association shall become totally and permanently disabled, to the extent that a physician or surgeon acceptable to the Board of Trustees shall certify that such disability will permanently prevent said member from performing his /her duties in the Shakopee Fire Department, the Association shall pay to such member the amount accrued for each year that he /she served as an active member of the Shakopee Fire Department. If a member who has received such a disability pension should subsequently recover and return to active duty in the Shakopee Fire Department, any dollar amount paid to him /her as a disability pension shall be deducted from his /her service pension. Section 3 Death Benefits a. Upon the death of any member of the Association who is in good standing at the time of his /her death, the Association shall pay to the beneficiary, as named in the most current Relief Association Beneficiary Form, the amount accrued per the calculation in Attachment A, for each year that he /she served as an active member of the Shakopee Fire Department. Section 4 Pensions a. The Association shall pay to each member who shall have served as an active firefighter in the Shakopee Fire Department for a period of twenty (20) years or more prior to his /her resignation from said Fire Department, and who has reached the age of fifty (50) years or more, and who has been a member of the Association for at least five years, the amount accrued per the calculation in Attachment A, for each year that he /she has served as an active member of the Shakopee Fire Department. 17 b. A member of the Association who shall have served in the Shakopee Fire Department for at least twenty (20) years, but has not reached the age of fifty (50) years may retire and be placed on the deferred pension roll. When he /she reaches the age of fifty (50) years, and provided that at that time he /she has been a member of the Association for at least five years, upon application therefore he /she shall be paid the amount accrued per the calculation in Attachment A, for each year that he /she served as an active member in the Shakopee Fire Department. He /she will not be eligible to receive any of the benefits provided for in Article IX Section 2. C. Pensions payable to members on the deferred pension roil shall be based on the amount payable per year of service in effect at the time of retirement. d. During the time that a member is on the deferred pension roll, the Association shall add to the amount payable to such member interest, compounded annually, at the rate of 5% per year. This covers all members on deferred rolls and covers past members who are presently on the deferred roll. e. No less than thirty (30) days before becoming eligible to receive a lump sum pension, as accrued, a member of this Association may make an irrevocable election that such pension shall be paid to him /her in a number of annual installments. If the member who has made such an election dies before all of his /her pension has been paid to him /her, any amount thereof remaining unpaid will be paid, in a lump sum, to his /her beneficiary. The Association shall add interest, compounded annually, at the rate of 5% per year to the unpaid amount of installments owed to any member. f. Upon written request from the retiring member, the Secretary or Treasurer shall directly transfer the service pension amount into an Individual Retirement Account under Section 408(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. Section 5 Early Vested Pensions a. If a member shall have served for more than five (5) years, but less than twenty (20) years as an active firefighter in the Shakopee Fire Department, he /she may retire from the Fire Department and be placed on the early vested pension roll. When he /she reaches the age of fifty (50) years, and provided that at that time he /she has been a member of the Association for at least five (5) years, he /she shall upon application therefore, be paid in the following manner: Completed Years of Service Nonforfeitable Percentage of Pension Amount 5 40 percent 6 44 percent 7 48 percent 8 52 percent 9 56 percent 10 60 percent 11 64 percent 12 68 percent 13 72 percent 14 76 percent 15 80 percent 16 84 percent 17 88 percent 18 92 percent 19 96 percent 20 'and thereafter 100 percent 1. During the time that any member is on the early vested pension roll, he /she will not be eligible to receive any of'the benefits provided for in Article IX. 2. Pension payable to members on the early vested pension roll shall be based on the amount payable per year of service in effect at the time of such early retirement. During the time that a member is on the early vested pension roll, the Association shall add to the amount payable to such member interest, compounded annually, at the rate of 5% per year. This covers all members on early vested rolls and covers past members who are presently on early vested rolls. 19 7MrPTrT.iR X Section 1 Amendments a. No amendments shall be made to these bylaws unless proposed at a regular or special meeting, at which time the amendments shall be referred to a special committee who shall present a report at the next regular or special meeting, which will be held within sixty (60) days. b. All members shall receive a copy of the proposed amendment(s), by mail, at least ten (10) days prior to meetings at which the amendment(s) are to be voted on. C. Any proposed amendment must be adopted by a 2/3 vote of the Association members providing a quorum is present. d. If the amendment(s) shall change the amount of pensions benefits, approval of the Shakopee City Council must be obtained before such change may take effect. 20 ATTACHMENT A Investment Fund Policy The funds received by this Association from dues, fines, application fees, entertainments and other miscellaneous sources shall be kept in the General Fund of the Association and may be disbursed for any purpose reasonably related to the welfare of the association or its members. The Special Fund assets of the Relief Association must be invested in securities that are authorized by Section 69.775. These investments include Certificates of Deposit and Savings Accounts with federally insured Savings and Loans, Savings Banks and Banks, investment in Government Securities, and investments with the State Board of Investments. The governing board of the Association may select and appoint investment agencies to act for and in its behalf or may certify funds for investment by the State Board of Investment under Section 11A.17. The governing board of the Association may select and appoint a qualified private firm to measure management performance and return on investment, and the firm shall use the formula of formulas developed by the State Board under section 11A.04, clause (11). The purpose of the investment policy is: to direct the investments of the fund; to balance the risk /return of the investment; to invest in prudent investment vehicles as described above; to calculate the funds future benefit obligations; to manage the earnings of the fund to provide a return based on the weighted average of all investments, which takes into consideration changes in the economy and inflation /recession so as to maximize that return without potential risk of the principal invested; to maintain a mix of investments. Per year of service amounts: Year / Amount 1994 $2263.00 Year / Amount 1998 $3062.00 Year / Amount 2002 $5000.00 Year / Amount 1995 $2332.00 Year / Amount 1999 $3347.00 Year / Amount 2003 $5750.00 Year / Amount 1996 $2498.00 Year / Amount 2000 $3847.00 Year / Amount 2004 $6600.00 Year / Amount 1997 $2688.00 Year / Amount 2001 $4400.00 Year / Amount 2005 $7500.00 Members of the Association will be paid the "per year of service" level that is in force at the time of disbursement. The 'per year of service" level changes on August l The "per year of service" year is from August 1 st tp July 31 Benefit amounts would not be retroactive back to January 1 st of said year. 21 /S CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum CASE NO.: 01085 TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Mark Noble, Planner I SUBJECT: Vacation of Street Right -of -Way for 4 Avenue between Cass and Webster Streets MEETING DATE: September 4, 2001 '!1 Darren Giese, 408 Cass Street, has submitted an application for vacation of street right -of -way for 0 Avenue between Cass and Webster Streets. On August 21, 2001, the Council reviewed this request and directed staff to prepare a resolution approving a vacation of street right -of- way for 0 Avenue between Cass and Webster Streets, with a condition that a trail easement be reserved over the entirety of the right -of -way. 1. Approve Resolution No. 5569, a resolution of the City of Shakopee approving the vacation of street right -of -way for 0 Avenue between Cass and Webster Streets. 2. Do not pass Resolution No. 5569. 3. Table the decision to allow staff or the applicant time to provide additional information. Offer a motion to approve Resolution No. 5569, a resolution of the City of Shakopee approving the vacation of street right -of -way for e Avenue between Cass and Webster Streets, and move its adoption. Mark oble Plan r I g: \cc\2001 \0904 \vacgiese. doc RE SOLUTI ON O ST REET A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE VACATING ', �' : L r STR EETS, OF r PEE, SCOTT CO UNTY, MINNESO interest: 2. That the Street right - of - -way described above does not serve further public purpose for street purposes; and 3. That the street right -of - -way described above is hereby vacated. 4. That a trail easement be reserved over the entirety of the right -of -way. After the adoption of the Resolution, the City Clerk shall file certified copies hereof with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Scott County. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the day of , 2001. Jon P. Brekke, Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Judith S. Co-, City Clerk PREPARED BY: City of Shakopee 129 Hohnes Street South Shakopee. MN 55379 I, Judith S. Cox, City Clerk of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 5569, presented to and adopted by the City Council of the City of Shakopee at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the 4th day of September, 2001, as shown by the minutes of the meeting in my possession. Dated this day of - 2001 Judith S. Cox, City Clerk FROM: Julie Klima, Planner II SUBJECT: Final Plat of Providence Pointe MEETING DATE: September 4, 2001 VIEW PERIOD: July 13 — September 11, 2001 Site Information: Applicant: Town & Country Homes Property Owners: Same Location: South of Hwy 169 and west of 17 Avenue East Current Zoning: Planned Residential District (PRD) Adjacent Zoning: North: Highway 169 South: Agricultural Preservation (AG) East: Highway Business (B 1) and Multiple Family Residential (R3) West: Jackson SA: The site is within the MJSA boundary. Introduction: Town and Country Homes is requesting Final Plat approval of Providence Pointe. The property is located south of Hwy. 169 and west of 17 Avenue East extended (Exhibit A). Considerations: 1. The Preliminary Plat for this development was approved by the City Council in May 2001. The Preliminary Plat was named Heritage Square, however, the name of the development has since been changed to Providence Pointe. This change was made in an attempt to avoid confusion with other similar named developments. 2. The Final Plat for Providence Pointe is in substantial conformance with the Preliminary Plat. ted that the Final Plat should be titled Providence Pointe I' 3. The City Clerk has commen Addition, as there will be future phases developed. 4. The City Attorney has commented that the dedication language will need to be revised to include "drives, avenue, streets, way and circle ". 5. The Preliminary Plat sets forth area to be dedicated for park purposes. The final plat of the I' Addition shall be revised to include that area to be dedicated for parkland. 6_ The Fire Inspector has commented that changes to watermain and hydrant locations are to be approved by the Fire Inspector. 7. The Police Department has commented that the illumination of house numbers is helpful in locating a specific address in emergency cases. Alternatives: 1. Approve the Final Plat of Providence Pointe, subject to the conditions contained in the attached Resolution No. 5579: 2. Approve the Final Plat of Providence Pointe with revised conditions. 3. Do not approve the Final Plat of Providence Pointe. 4. Table a decision in order to allow time for the applicant and/or staff to submit additional information or make any necessary revisions. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1, approval of the final plat, subject to the conditions listed within Resolution No. 5579. Action Requested: Offer a motion to approve Resolution No. 5579 and move its adoption. J Klima P anner II o: \cc\ 2001 \cc0904\tpprovidencepointe.doc 2 RESOLUTION NO. 5579 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF PROVIDENCE POINTE WHEREAS, Town and Country Homes, applicant and property owner, has filed an application dated and received July 13, 2001 for final plat approval; and WHEREAS, the property upon which the request is being made is legally described as follows: The North Half of the Northwest Quarter excepting therefrom the north 10 rods thereof, Section 18, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota; also excepting. That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 18, Township 115, Range 22 West, shown as Parcel 57 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat Numbered 70 -4 as the same is on file and of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Scott County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, all notices of the public hearing for the Preliminary Plat of Heritage Square (nka Providence Pointe) were duly sent and posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Shakopee Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat, and the City Council approved same on May 1, 2001; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the final plat at its meeting of September 4, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. OFT E CITY OF S AKOPEE, MINNESOTA, as follows: That the Final Plat of PROVIDENCE POINTE is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: I. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the Final Plat: A. Approval of title by the City Attorney. B. Execution of a Developers Agreement with provisions for Plan A and Plan B improvements, as well as payment of engineering review fees, and any other fees as required by the City's adopted fee schedule. 1. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 2. Electrical system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 3. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 4. Installation of sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems, and construction of streets in accordance with the requirements of the Design Criteria and Standard Specifications of the City of Shakopee. 5. The developer shall be responsible for payment of Trunk Storm Water Charges for the residential portion of the plat, Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges, security for the public improvements, engineering review fees, and other fees as required by the City's adopted Fee Schedule for the entire plat. 6. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City Engineer and the Shakopee Public Utility Commission approve the Final Construction Plans and Specifications. 7. The public parkland shall be dedicated with the final plat. C. A MnDOT drainage permit will be required for this development. D. The landscape plan shall be revised to clarify the number of shrubs that meet minimum size requirements under the City Code. E. Trees planted in the boulevard areas of the public streets in this plat shall be the responsibility of the homeowners association to maintain and replace. F. The plat and other relevant documents shall be revised to include turnarounds for shared driveways in excess of 150 ft. in length. G. The plat shall be renamed to Providence Pointe 1S` Addition. H. Dedication language shall be revised to include the dedication of drives, avenue, streets, way and circle. I. Park dedication requirements are met with the dedication of parkland as depicted in the preliminary plat. The final plat shall be revised to include the total area to be dedicated for parkland purposes. J. Changes to watermain and hydrant locations are to be approved by the Fire Inspector. H. Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following conditions shall apply; A. Building construction, sewer, water service, fire protection and access will be reviewed for code compliance at the time of building permit application(s). B. No berming, ponding, signage, or landscaping shall be located in MNDOT right - of -way. C. Any work within the Scott County right -of -way will require a utility permit from the County_ D. Any required sound mitigation on this site shall be the responsibility of the developer and their assigns. THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that approval of the final plat of PROVIDENCE POINTE does not constitute a representation or guarantee by the City of Shakopee as to the amount, sufficiency or level of water service that will be available to lots within the plat as they are developed. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the day of , 2001. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk in j V l FM'al Plat of Providence Park • • Bo Parce Bounda N �p� W E SHAKOHE S Cgw.armYPn��e�.� 08/29/ 14:49 FAX 952 937 5822 W Professional Services, Inc. PLANNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING Date: August 29, 2001 WESTWOOD PROF. . r To: Julie Klima City of Shakopee From_ Chris Moehd Regarding: Providence Pointe Project No.: 20 -1056 Number of pages including this cover letter 5 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Plume 952- 937 -5150 Fax 952. 937 -5822 Toll free: 1- 888 - 937 -5150 E -mail: wps@westwoodps.com TWIN CITIEWETRO 5T. CLOUD BRAINERD Please call 952- 937 -5150 if you do not receive all pages or experience difficulty receiving this transmission. Purpose: As you requested Remarks: Julie Atta ched is a copy of the final plat as you requested_ _____ Copy to: Krista Flemming, Dwight Jelle Desig,v I the FumeToday -.since 1972 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FACSIMILE MESSAGE IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED SOLELY FOR THE USE OF THE PERSONS OR ENTITIES NAMED ABOVE. IF YOU ARE NOT SUCH PERSONS OR ENTITIES, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISTRIBUTION. DISSEMINATION OR REPRODUCTION OF THIS FACSIMILE MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR. PLEASE IMMEDIATELY CALL US COLLECT AT M") 0 17.11 an 08/29/01 14.49 FAX 952 937 5822 WESTWOOD PROF. SERVICES d e ► � I 2f iL ga 1�4j c e j afi fi 9 a yy nn . zr rs z ._a Lu 5 cc 0 . E Om s a c0 z s a FF 5 g s S 5 x . gy S ti 7A� SY t E Om s a c0 z s a FF 5 g s S 5 x . tYae c K t g$aa II § � `s ► ie �'� 3 fl 2 € y e��d A i S ��Eg3 3 Sse � N L k8E i _,1af alai E Om s a c0 z s a 08/29/01 14:50 FAX 952 937 5822 WESTWOOD PROF. SERVICES LgJ UU3 /UUu _ G8LS1/ � n �L 11_J { I r - , n ; 1 I I Cl 8 u I h � � S 7 EEO ------------ Lorne O- I I a 3 .K1t.00 N k � �� , I • I ir � I I ' y w A w g a � .+ 5� I U L wv )..�s4ao• ` Nr ' j I = r 2 •mw. r ,I ? 1 � 1Ka..om i I r �, % I W d i jtirn.i � II � nl S i• Q • L O � b a a 3 m � ma II A ^ J I µ a 5 z i I� la tZ ( II 7 i. 2 � 2 R i t. aaa C� <" _ s s�z Y I t s § p L _ � ;= ZZ>.lZ.00H 3Z 33 7 O . v,,, m m -a-• oe e °-G _ _ - l: .i 2 .J: � i.1 — T t Z[Q9Z 3ZD,lZ.DQN .... _ _f__— _______ 08/29 A:50 FAX 952 937 5822 WESTWOOD PROF. SERVICES Lqj UU4 /UUO 6� �2 _x FE w �� i� ny a g�bs ma a mrs M C L U B.� 0 0 Z mrt T $� � Q. T ° T 8 ° y gy = T T gig T 2�?a Lu vMl 2 � g q m:r m aft I ma mu ma osa c c J .KUJa v ' .S miw a 1 as 1 a 0 g K Y�3 �e$ ma mu mrs mac mu mze mrt T $� � T 8 T ° T 8 ° y gy = T T gig T 2�?a a Y vMl g q m:r m mu ma mu ma osa 1 'g 4� C u v+ m ° vMl Y" J .KUJa v ' miw • t' a S A ID mSA 6 fiM it r.xr �' mw Jx,,.n� /•:? . --- ...111 I 08/29/01 14:51 FAX 952 937 5822 WESTWOOD PROF. SERVICES J.wr' . •ar• -_— u , m ___ ___ .rm s'w rrs a g` } la L U 1, y LU � �• ''� aka r �_ __ _ rta I zrm -- s'9 TSt1 aA ^ °f i �63 1& 005/005 1 YaT�fG � B f� W n'ri`,oa '• a` i apw a -_� - ' frrJ,•.�irt� %mss �'� `Q° f - `'su ma: >•.nrlr.ze r • :ir._r.m• m I � l, � 2 1 < b ?�Y �3 r 'ba• ma m F m R m� oo a a y.iJ�.mr fl �4 8� 1 r-I $ 1 m q4 A a zt� ,ra. i �t -! � ' r� _�.Lrz mac, ) Jur,za r = H - { I J ic.aa � -- I \ l �t yrttfa++ I � 18 gA ^t t 4 � 4 4 8 9i i8 •1 - ` • ).rK4my I l___ — m4r __ -1 H M ga vy"" 8Y 8 h 18 1 Xi t $ ii��.nnr g I I I 4 m•r, ).utf.so. g 1,1Ga(.eor M1 6 $� rO � C io mrt ma ma mn mu ma mu ®��:C rose z i I aim :_ P P : $ :• 3 z g 1 z14mr g L - - -- mst� - - - -J 3 „ 8g 8 p 8tg8R1181_8A':84:8a:a — 5 4 mb+ ., r 'c r--- i.�ur.00M- --� 1 �4 : 2 8 4 g • a4 lutr.m++ I I a mgr I - mu mu ma -rcu- m»� t4 I .I I° ,y y;P msrl ).rftr.e0 lfttl..iw J.IK + ��• 5 I matt I 3t — 1 S A 81 ® I $ ; L___ mAr ____J• T7 La mw J.nlv..r � )JUr.m. r I I � mzr mu ma mu ma maa m: mu mrr m I gl Q 12 a ° ' :,j= P P P P P � • P P r a ' EI t8 — -- - ? H=_ H�1 8�: 8�� H 8,;.i 8•,i 8�� H 8 a 8 } a L ---- �� --- -J e� arm mn mn ma ma ma m'a mu mw ma I: 81 IH � r"..� wttr a :u,,00 r - +ma meet unel •. � St � Ig met . .l!.'el[ melt 1rUr.mr 2rLL .oe+ lrli4[sr�- � I I IUr.mir —__ j 1 it AI EI i I I i I I .I I 7 I I • � •�3 31 Is : ii •�a gl $= I $ r: �� -� � E •I H� $ I If ros� IR ms.r $ $ d4z o $�58 °'• mru } L U 1, y LU I s$8 z; ^ °f i �63 1& 005/005 1 YaT�fG � B f� W n'ri`,oa '• a` i apw a -_� - ' frrJ,•.�irt� %mss �'� `Q° f - `'su ma: >•.nrlr.ze r • :ir._r.m• m I � l, � 2 1 < b ?�Y �3 r 'ba• ma m F m R m� oo a a y.iJ�.mr fl �4 8� 1 r-I $ 1 m q4 A a zt� ,ra. i �t -! � ' r� _�.Lrz mac, ) Jur,za r = H - { I J ic.aa � -- I \ l �t yrttfa++ I � 18 gA ^t t 4 � 4 4 8 9i i8 •1 - ` • ).rK4my I l___ — m4r __ -1 H M ga vy"" 8Y 8 h 18 1 Xi t $ ii��.nnr g I I I 4 m•r, ).utf.so. g 1,1Ga(.eor M1 6 $� rO � C io mrt ma ma mn mu ma mu ®��:C rose z i I aim :_ P P : $ :• 3 z g 1 z14mr g L - - -- mst� - - - -J 3 „ 8g 8 p 8tg8R1181_8A':84:8a:a — 5 4 mb+ ., r 'c r--- i.�ur.00M- --� 1 �4 : 2 8 4 g • a4 lutr.m++ I I a mgr I - mu mu ma -rcu- m»� t4 I .I I° ,y y;P msrl ).rftr.e0 lfttl..iw J.IK + ��• 5 I matt I 3t — 1 S A 81 ® I $ ; L___ mAr ____J• T7 La mw J.nlv..r � )JUr.m. r I I � mzr mu ma mu ma maa m: mu mrr m I gl Q 12 a ° ' :,j= P P P P P � • P P r a ' EI t8 — -- - ? H=_ H�1 8�: 8�� H 8,;.i 8•,i 8�� H 8 a 8 } a L ---- �� --- -J e� arm mn mn ma ma ma m'a mu mw ma I: 81 IH � r"..� wttr a :u,,00 r - +ma meet unel •. � St � Ig met . .l!.'el[ melt 1rUr.mr 2rLL .oe+ lrli4[sr�- � I I IUr.mir —__ j 1 it AI EI i I I i I I .I I 7 I I • � •�3 31 Is : ii •�a gl $= I $ r: �� -� � E •I H� $ I If ros� IR ms.r $ $ d4z o $�58 °'• mru 0.3, CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum 1 t TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Contract for Planning Consultant Services MEETING DATE: September 4, 2001 rff' ! 1 1 Requests for proposals (RFPs) were sent to eight (8) planning firms for the development of a new comprehensive plan and a corridor study for the Downtown, First Avenue, and river front areas. Proposals were received from two (2), URS and Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. (NAC). After a panel interview conducted by st4 staff concluded that NAC would be best suited to provide the planning services sought by the City. The estimate of fees for both studies was from $92,000 to $114,000 for URS and $50,550 for NAC. Attached to this report is a copy of a possible contract for services provided by NAC, as well their proposal. 1. Authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into a Contract for Professional Planning Services with NAC as presented and upon review and approval by the City Attorney. 2. Authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into a Contract for Professional Planning Services with NAC with revisions and upon review and approval by the City Attorney. 3. Do not approve entering into a contract' for services with NAC. 4. Table the decision to allow staff to provide additional information. 1 1 1' 1 • 1 Staff recommends either alternative 1 or 2. Offer a motion to authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into a Contract for Professional Planning Services with NAC either as presented or with revisions and upon review and approval by the City Attorney. R. Michael Leek Community Development Director gAcc\2001 \0904\NAC.doc 1, 1 J; U • q111 1 1111 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners @nacplanning.com August 28, 2001 • _ •_ • • This AGREEMENT made this day of 2001, by and between SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, hereinafter referred to as Client, and NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC., hereinafter referred to as the Consultant, relating to the employment of Consultant as follows: 1. The Consultant has completed and submitted a proposal dated June 22, 2001 for updating the Shakopee Comprehensive Plan and preparation of Special Area Studies and the Client, after due consideration, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in order to obtain the products described ih detail in the proposal. 2. The proposal is attached hereto as Attachment A and incorporated herein by reference_ For purposes of determining the scope of services to be performed, the proposal is considered to be an integral part of this Agreement. B. PRODUCTS TO BE PROVIDED BY CONSULTANT Consultant shall provide the products and services as described in the proposal which is attached as Attachment A of this Agreement. C. PRODUCTS TO BE PROVIDED BY CLIENT The following products are to be furnished to the Consultant by the Client 1 . Available relevant material pertaining to completion of the project. 2. Background information and Consultant product review through meetings and interviews with officials, staff and designated citizens and other interest groups as specified by Attachment A. City of Shakopee August 28, 2001 Page 2 The Consultant shall begin work on the project within one (1) week following the Client's approval of this Agreement, and shall be totally completed within seven (7) months from the date of work initiation, unless delayed for reasons of unexpected emergencies, forces beyond the control of the parties, or by request of a party acquiesced in writing by the other party. In the event the Consultant's performance of services hereunder is delayed due to acts of the Client or at the request of the Client and such delay exceeds sixty (60) days, the Consultant shall have the right to renegotiate the contract to account for rising costs before - resuming work and shall not be penalized for any delay resulting therefrom. The Client shall pay the Consultant: 1. On a monthly basis, based upon invoices submitted on a time and expense basis pursuant to the fee schedule attached as Attachment B, for work completed to an amount not to exceed Fifty Thousand Five Hundred Fifty ($50,550.00) for production work described within Attachment A of this Agreement. 2. All costs incurred will be due and payable to the Consultant upon receipt of an invoice showing the work completed and the cost of said work. For any invoice not paid within thirty (30) days, the Consultant will have the option of interrupting work without termination of the contract. A service charge of one (1) percent per month will be added to each invoice not paid within thirty (30) days from the date of invoice. 3. For any work authorized by the Client, documented in writing, which is beyond that described in this Agreement, such work shall not be included as part of the maximum dollar limit stated in paragraph F.1 above, but shall be compensated at established billing rates as described in the attached Standard Rate Schedule (Attachment B). City of Shakopee August 28, 2001 Page 3 1. It is mutually agreed that this Agreement is not transferable by either party to a third party without the written consent of the other, except as described in paragraph A.3 of this Agreement. 2. The Consultant's reports and other materials prepared in the performance of this Agreement are instruments of services and remain the property of the Client. However, any further distribution of these reports by the Client must note the Consultant as the source. 3. In the case of lawsuits or legal actions by a third party brought against the Client in which the Consultant is named, the Client shall assume responsibility and expense for legal defense of the Consultant, unless such lawsuit or legal action is the result of the actions or inactions of the Consultant. 1. This Agreement may be terminated by either party delivering to the other party written notice of termination, in which case this Agreement shall be terminated as of 9:00 AM on the tenth (10th) day following receipt of said written notice (termination date). 2. The Consultant shall have the right to retain those materials which are the direct result of work performed by Consultant for which Consultant is due payment from Client. Consultant shall deliver to Client all such materials upon payment by Client for such work performed. 3. In the event of termination by the Consultant, the Consultant shall forward to the Client on or prior to the termination date any unearned fees or retainers held by the Consultant. All materials held by the Consultant shall be returned to the Client within seven (7) days of the termination date. City of Shakopee August 28, 2001 Page 4 4. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall be paid only for work actually performed prior to the Consultant's receipt of the Notice of Termination. Payment shall be based upon the hourly rate set forth in Attachment B of this Agreement. Total payments shall not exceed, however, the "not to exceed" amounts set forth in paragraph F of this Agreement. NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. n ! Conditions Herein Agreed To: SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Jon Brekke, Mayor Mark McNeill, City Administrator I- Date Date Please Sign and Return One Copy Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies P & MA - City of Shakopee Page Introduction............................................................... ............................... 1 Section One - Background and Qualifications .......... ............................... 1 Section Two - Issues and Work Program ................. ............................... 5 Section Three - Firm Qualifications .......................... ............................... 11 Section Four - Project Budget ................................... ............................... 18 Section Five - Project Schedule ................................ ............................... 20 Appendix...................... ............................... ............................... 21 Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2001 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies P" City of Shakopee The City of Shakopee is requesting proposals for consulting services to assist with the update of the Comprehensive Plan and develop special area studies for four specific areas of the community. The City, with its setting adjacent to the Minnesota River, proximity to the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, abundance of natural features, commercial /industrial base and large land reserve, is in a highly desirable position to attract additional residents, business and industry. Shakopee is an established river front community that has recently experienced tremendous growth due in part to favorable market conditions, location and major transportation improvements including the completion of the new Bloomington Ferry Bridge Crossing and Highway 169 Bypass. The recent construction boom has expanded opportunities for business, retail, industrial and residential housing, but has also created new issues associated with the relocation of retail and businesses from the traditional downtown area to the 169 Bypass. The rate and intensity of development has put pressure on local government services and has resulted in the need to re- evaluate the community's Comprehensive Plan. In response to Shakopee's request for proposals, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. (NAC) has formulated this submission. We believe that our firm is uniquely qualified for this project due to our familiarity and experience with Scott County. Our staff serves as the consultant planner for the City of Elko and we have spent the past year working with Scott County to update its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations and have experience with the City of Belle Plaine. The initial section provides information on NAC's background and qualifications. This is followed by an outline of our proposed work program, specific comprehensive planning, area study, and facilitation experience and personnel to be assigned to the project. The final proposal section consists of the project budget and detailed time line under which we would complete the City's Comprehensive Plan update and special area studies. Relevant work examples and staff resumes are included with the submission. NAC is a community planning consulting firm which has served local government for more than twenty five years. Since 1973, we have assisted more than 130 communities with a broad range of planning projects, including Comprehensive Plans and plan updates, development regulations (e.g. zoning and subdivision ordinances), development project review, special studies including parks, trails, and community facilities, street scape plans, architectural guidelines, and redevelopment plans. NAC has experience working with Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2001 1 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies mo t F City of Shakopee several communities including New Hope, Wayzata, Oak Park Heights, Mendota Heights and Marine on St. Croix in the development of special area studies and downtown revitalization plans. Our client communities are located throughout Minnesota. Approximately half of our current client list of thirty are metropolitan area cities and we serve more than a dozen in greater Minnesota and the "collar" counties surrounding the Twin Cities area. NAC has extensive experience working in the southwest metro where we serve as the planning consultant for the City's of Lakeville and Elko and have just recently completed a Comprehensive Plan and development regulations update for Scott County. As a complement to this work, our exposure to a wide variety of metropolitan cities and development issues has allowed us to apply the fullest range of contemporary planning techniques. Special Area Studies Wayzata NAC has worked with many communities on special area studies which have similar characteristics to the four areas identified within the City of Shakopee. While working as planning consultant to the City of Wayzata in the 1990's, NAC was involved in numerous land use, parking and design studies for the downtown area. In addition, our firm worked with the City in establishing tax increment districts, implementation of parking regulations, and a parking ramp as part of a redevelopment project. NAC assisted the City of Wayzata in the development of its Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and environmental regulations and in development review that is consistent with the City's version of its downtown area. In cooperation with Wilson Development Services, NAC was involved in the planning for and implementation of a plan to develop the West Lake Street of Wayzata. The area had consisted of an older office building, a truck storage facility, and the site of Wayzata's first waste water treatment plant. NAC assisted the City in land use planning, in conducting a site design contest, and in securing a developer to implement the vision for the property. Wilson Development Services provided assistance in acquisition and relocation of the existing businesses. The development, consisting of high end twinhomes and office buildings, is now complete. Oak Park Heic7hts Since 1978, NAC has provided planning assistance to the City of Oak Park Heights including comprehensive planning, ordinance updates, and development review. In 1991, the City annexed 392 acres in order to allow construction of the Stillwater Area High Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2oui 4 Com rehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies A A City of Shakopee School. For the remaining area, NAC participated in the development of land use and transportation plans and in implementing these plans through development review and approvals. The area is almost two - thirds completed with a small shopping center and other commercial businesses. Throughout the planning process, NAC and the City worked closely with the Metropolitan Council in assuring compliance with regional plans and sewer extension. Additionally, NAC has assisted the City in the development of Design Guidelines so as to unify the appearance of the area and assure high quality building and site appearance. New Hope NAC has been involved with the City of New Hope since 1975. In recent years, we have been directly involved with the analysis and evaluation of two areas of the community. The first area involved the 42 Avenue Corridor Study. This study evaluated street scape, commercial redevelopment, and transportation networks along this corridor. NAC's involvement included meeting with property owners, evaluating property ownership and land use patterns, making recommendations for improving traffic circulation off of County Road 9 and establishing the commercial land use patterns that were compatibly integrated with the adjoining residential neighborhoods. The second area of interest was done in conjunction with. a Livable Communities Grant in 2000. This area included the Hosterman Junior High School site and extended along the Bass Lake Road street corridor, involving a number of redevelopment sites. With the closing of Hosterman Junior High School, the City wants to investigate the potential for redevelopment of this large tract of land. Additionally, we were asked to evaluate what land use patterns and traffic circulation patterns in this area of the community may work while fulfilling Livable Communities objectives established by the Metropolitan Council. NAC evaluated the site and adjoining properties to establish a residential development pattern that was integrated with commercial development at the intersection of Bass Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue. A second target area within this study was the 5400 Block of Winnetka Avenue which involved very deep single family lots that under - utilized the space that was available. NAC prepared an analysis of utilities and transportation to illustrate how the land could be resubdivided in a manner that was compatible with the adjoining land uses and remove the access points off of Winnetka Avenue. NAC is now in the process of assisting the City of New Hope with a Livable Communities Grant to implement the strategies that were already identified in the land use concept plans. Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2001 3 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies P P P Marine on St. Croix City of Shakopee NAC was asked to assist the City of Marine on St. Croix in illustrating or preparing a Village Center concept plan for their historic downtown. Marine on St. Croix is one of the oldest cities in Minnesota and has served as a freestanding growth center in northeastern Washington County. Their downtown consists of a number of historically significant buildings. The task before NAC and a local task force was to illustrate how the Village Center may grow by providing some new development sites as well as how that new development may be integrated within the historical character of the community. Through the process of community meetings, NAC designers were able to meet with the citizen task force to define both traffic circulation patterns, needed parking arrangements, as well as defining building sites that can be integrated into the Village Center without disrupting the theme, feel and character of the area. This work was completed in January of 2001. In the following pages, we hope to communicate our commitment to providing planning services which address the specific issues faced by the City of Shakopee. We believe that the role of the consultant is to help the community understand its options, set its land use and development goals, and implement effectively designed strategies to achieve those goals. Plans work when the community has a sense of ownership in the plan itself. In our experience, that sense of ownership is gained when the community sets the agenda and identifies the issues to be addressed. Our work program for Shakopee is designed to elicit involvement and participation from all areas of the community including residents, local organizations, business owners and government jurisdictions. NAC's approach actively promotes public participation in the planning process. The review of the Comprehensive Plan update will help to develop consensus in the City's response to development needs, the delivery of public services, growth direction, and the many other issues which affect the use of limited community resources. We seek to provide a useful tool in the community's decision - making process which will continue to guide policy for the foreseeable future. Finally, NAC believes that the plan is essentially a policy document. Answers to specific land use and development questions come from the City's general approach to land use management, and the City's goals for itself. We strive to help the community create a consistent policy approach to its land use issues. In this way, the City is able to make the best use of its Comprehensive Plan over the years, even though individual development issues change regularly. Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 1uui 4 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies P Cdy of Shakopee At NAC, we think that the longevity of our relationship with so many of our current clients is based on this approach. We hope to have an opportunity to work with Shakopee on a Comprehensive Plan and special area studies which: (1) Address the issues important to the community in a complete and efficient manner; (2) Provide a truly comprehensive guide to making short and long term land use and development decisions; (3) Ensure implementation of the selected land use and policies through zoning and subdivision ordinance and design guideline updates. • •- _•, -. Issues for the Shakopee Comprehensive Plan Based upon the request for proposals letter, the work program has been based on an initial understanding of what the City hopes to accomplish with this planning process and the issues that are currently facing the community. We anticipate that much of the Comprehensive Plan documentation that is currently under review by the Metropolitan Council, will provide a good information and mapping base to start from. The overall Comprehensive Plan -will need to be reviewed based upon recent development, current demographic information and trends. The bulk of the work program, will involve the development of the specific area studies identified in the Request for Proposal. The four study areas will require detailed land use and transportation analysis to develop revitalization plans that address business retention and re- investment, neighborhood vitality, river front redevelopment, land consolidation, historic preservation as well as pedestrian /transportation management. The broadly defined issues identified above are familiar to those faced by many cities in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, including NAC clients. The members of the consulting team that will be working with Shakopee have had the opportunity to work with these issues through day -to -day or Comprehensive Plan projects with NAC client communities. NAC, however, always applies the experience of these past projects within the unique context of the client community. Due to the differing objectives, development demand, regional market, and various other characteristics, there can be no standard answer to a community's concerns. Therefore, NAC recognizes that creativity can be just as important as experience in addressing planning issues. The work program is designed to ensure Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2uu1 5 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies P P P City of Shakopee creative planning approaches which respond to the unique and varied character of Shakopee. This approach incorporates a flexibility that allows the City to address individual neighborhoods and planning areas with creative strategies that are most appropriate to the issues faced in each area. The update of a Comprehensive Plan and development of area studies are, for NAC, a highly individualized process. Each step of the project is determined by the outcomes of the previous steps. However, there is a defined outline to our approach which entails five general phases of work. These are: (1) Issue Identification, (2) Inventory, (3) Policy Planning, (4) Development Framework, and (5) Implementation. These phases are defined below. Issues Identification At the outset of the project, NAC seeks to determine the most specific set of issues possible which must be addressed by the Comprehensive Plan update. The purpose here is two -fold. First, this work allows the City to focus the planning work on the areas which are of critical importance to the community, and to avoid spending valuable attention on issues which are of little consequence to the City's decision- making. Second, it assures the City that the Comprehensive Plan will address all of the issues which are real and present in the community, making sure that the plan does not miss anything which could be overlooked with a more routine process. We anticipate that the existing Comprehensive Plan will require modification to incorporate issues associated with recent development pressure and infrastructure improvements which have 'occurred in the community. The study areas will require specific attention in the issues identification phase to account for the unique circumstances of each area. The process for issue identification is formulated at the beginning of this stage, and is structured to meet the City's objectives for the plan. As a first step, a project initiation conference would be held with City Council, Planning Commission, City staff, and consultants. This would be followed by a series of "follow -up" interviews with the City Council members, Planning Commission members, City staff, consultants, and other community leaders and residents in order to identify issues which may be apparent only to certain sectors of the Shakopee community. In order to achieve a high degree of familiarity with the public perceptions on growth and other issues, NAC will conduct two workshops, one with residents in general and the other with business owners to discuss philosophies and concepts of growth for the City. NAC also proposes to conduct four Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2001 0 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies P W A I City of Shakopee neighborhood open house sessions with the residents /businesses within each of the specific study areas to ascertain site specific issues and opportunities related to the study area. Areas of concentration for the Comprehensive Plan update will be identified during this initial phase of work. The product resulting from the Issues Identification phase is a report to the City which lays out a "strategic plan" for the remainder of the Comprehensive Plan pro&am. This strategic plan will guide the remaining work program, both in content and format. In addition, it forms the first section of the Comprehensive Plan document. Issue Identification Tasks Project initiation meeting with the City Council, Planning Commission, City staff and consultants. 2. Conduct community interviews. 3. Two community workshops. 4. Four neighborhood open house sessions. 5. Preparation of report to the Planning Commission. 6. Identification of additional public participation needs. 7. Presentation of Issue Identification report to the Planning Commission. MI The community will identify the primary issues which the Comprehensive Plan update will address through the Issues Identification process. To supplement that process, NAC will modify the City's inventory of existing conditions from the current Comprehensive Plan to update the information and to develop an information base for each specific study area. The inventory process occurs concurrently with the Issues Identification process in order to accomplish two objectives. First, the scope of the plan is focused during the Issues phase. The Inventory data which is of principal interest to the community can then be presented in fuller detail. Second, the Inventory itself helps to identify some of the City's comprehensive planning issues, and provides a check on the Issues Identification phase of work. As a unit, the Inventory section describes Shakopee at a particular point in time. Each of these categories is emphasized according to their relevance identified in the Issues phase. The product of the Inventory phase is the second major chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, consisting of text, charts, and maps illustrating the most relevant of the collected information. This chapter provides a single resource for data on the City's condition at the time of the Comprehensive Plan project. NAC will work with City staff and other City consultants to complete the maps for the Inventory. Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2001 7 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies P"A City of Shakopee A Planning Commission meeting would be planned near the end of this stage to discuss the draft Inventory report, and finalize any additional details of the presentation of the data. Inventory Tasks 1. Collect maps, records, and other data available through the City or other sources. 2. Work with the City staff and consultants to map the available data to illustrate relationships with other issues. 3. Highlight noteworthy issues apparent from the collected Inventory. 4. Cross -check the physical Inventory information with issues and information collected at the community workshop and interviews. 5. Prepare a summary report with comments on the relevant topic areas raised by the Inventory analysis. 6. Meet with the Planning Commission to discuss the Inventory results. 7. Finalize the Inventory chapter for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan. •3 a At the beginning of this stage of work, the existing conditions in the community will have been documented, and the issues important to the community agreed upon. The next work phase is to determine what modifications are necessary for the policy plan of the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the community's current objectives. A part of this process is the development of a consistent set of integrated policy positions which clarify, and identify the more general goal statements. Whereas the Inventory illustrates where the City is, the Policy Plan describes where it wants to be. From a practical standpoint in the City's development 'decision-making process, policy planning provides a base line against which unplanned development proposals can be measured. In the City of Shakopee, for instance, gauging the impacts of new development in various areas of the City will depend on how well a proposed development project is consistent with the City's established goals, objectives, and policies. The published policies give the City a solid defensible basis for approving or rejecting proposed development requests. Similarly, prioritizing the City's resources can best be accomplished when the goals are clear. The Goals and Policies allow the City to answer the question. How thoroughly does a development option meet the City's goals? And which goal is the most important? Clear goals permit more efficient use of the City's resources, or at least, a full understanding of the costs of different choices. The product of the policy planning phase is the third chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. This section consists of a series of general goal statements, with an increasing level of Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2009 E Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies City of Shakopee definition to more specific policies. Policy planning requires at least one meeting with the Planning Commission and City Council, in addition to others whom the City believes appropriate in these discussions. Policv Planning Tasks 1. Consultant development of goal and issue categories for policy consideration. 2. Preparation of Goals and Policies report. 3. Meeting with Planning Commission and City Council to review draft Goals and Policies. 4. Finalization of Goals and Policies chapter. 5. Additional meetings as may be necessary. Development Framework The fourth major chapter of the Comprehensive Plan consists of the physical plans and programs which lay out the City's proposed land use, transportation system, parks and recreation planning and other community facilities plans. We anticipate that the development framework will require the bulk of work associated with this project as there is a need to plan for future growth areas. The special area studies will comprise a significant part of the development framework as these areas require immediate attention to address business retention, neighborhood vitality and redevelopment. The breadth of this chapter is determined, to an extent, by the issues which are identified in the early stages of the planning process. Each step in NAC's planning process is tied to the others in this same way. In this section, the City's plan for directing development would be established. This "Development Framework "' identifies the areas of Shakopee in which development of various types will be considered. In addition to the land use element of the plan, transportation planning will identify roadway improvements necessary to support the expanding land uses. Throughout the planning process, but especially during this phase, NAC will work with City staff and its consultants to provide input and analysis of the impact of engineering related plans and to provide the required Comprehensive Plan maps. The City Engineer's input will be sought in the following areas: updates to transportation, surface water drainage, waste water and water issues. Based upon the plan alternative selected by the City, a draft Comprehensive Plan will be prepared with the following elements: Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2001 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies P p • Land Use and Growth Management • Transportation and Infrastructure • Community /Public Facilities • Housing • Public Safety • Economic Development • Park Trail, Recreation and Open Space Development • Industrial /Business Development • Central Business District • Environmental Analysis • Coordination with Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances �z City of Shakopee The Development Framework phase will typically require two working conferences to determine a concept plan alternative and a Development Framework chapter. NAC will also conduct reviews with the City staff as necessary to discuss initial changes or alternatives for community consideration. Development Framework Tasks 1. Preparation of concept plan and alternatives, as appropriate. 2. Presentation of concept plan and alternatives to the study area neighborhoods /businesses. 3. Presentation of concept plans, alternatives and study area recommendations from neighborhoods /businesses to the Planning Commission. 3. Development of draft Development Framework chapter utilizing input from the Planning Commission. 4. Update and development of sub - chapter plans 'supporting the land use element (transportation, utilities, community facilities, etc.). 5. Presentation of Development Framework to the Planning Commission and City Council. 6. Finalization of Development Framework chapter. Implementation While the comprehensive planning process is largely complete at this point, little value will come of the planning effort without a significant level of attention to how the elements of the plan will be implemented. A summary section to the City identifying its options for integration of the Comprehensive Plan as part of its decision - making process will be drafted. A meeting with the Planning Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2001 10 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies P"A City of Shakopee Commission will be necessary to discuss implementation strategy and prioritize projects. An open house /public meeting will be conducted to receive public comment on the plan. Planning Commission public hearings will be held in conjunction with the open house. NAC will then finalize the plan for approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. Implementation Tasks 1. ' Prepare Implementation section. 2. Meeting with Planning Commission to discuss Implementation. 3. Provide final copy of plan for City approval. 4. Conduct open house /public hearings. 5. Final City Council approval of the plan. Related project Experience Over its 25 year history, NAC has been involved in literally hundreds of comprehensive plans and related projects. However, the following selected list of work examples attempts to more specifically demonstrate the firm's experience in matters which parallel the issues and concerns which currently confront Shakopee. Of the cities listed below, many are included in the Twin Cities Seven County Metropolitan Area and have been subject to Metropolitan Council review and approval. We highly encourage you to contact these or any of our current or past clients since we believe these references are the best testimonial to our commitment to quality planning services. Comprehensive Plans Albertville Contact Person Phone: Big Lake Contact Person: Phone: Clear Lake Contact Person Phone: 1996 Linda Goeb, City Administrator 612/497 -3384 2000 Patrick Wussow, City Administrator 763/263 -2107 1999 Marilyn Bujalski, City Clerk 3201743 -3111 Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2001 11 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies p P P Clearwater 1995 Contact Person: Debby Millner, City Clerk Phone: 3201558 -2428 City of Shakopee Delano 1993 Contact Person: Kathleen Miller, City Administrator Phone: 7631972 -0550 Detroit Lakes 2000 Contact Person: Larry Remmen, Community Development Director Phone: 507/584 -6821 Mendota Heights Contact Person Phone Monticello Contact Person: Phone: 2000 Jim Danielson, Acting City Administrator 651/452-1850 1996 Jeff O'Neill, Deputy Administrator 763/295 -2711 New Hope 2001 Contact Person: Kirk McDonald, Community Development Director Phone 763/531 -5100 Oak Park Heights 1999 Contact Person: Kris Danielson, Community Development Director Phone: 6511439 -4439 Otsego 1998 Contact Person: Mike Robertson, City Administrator Phone: 7631441 -4414 Rockford 1999 Contact Person: Nancy Evers, City Administrator Phone: 763/477 -6565 Scott County 2001 Contact Person: Michael Sobota, Community Development Director Phone: 9521496 -8366 Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 200 1 12 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies PM*A City of Shakopee Wayzata 1990 Contact Person: Sarah Smith, Planner Phone: 9521474 -0234 Housing Studies Belle Plaine 1998 Contact Person: Joanne Foust, Community Development Director Phone: 952/873 -5553 Belle Plaine 1993 Contact Person: Joanne Foust, Community Development Director Phone: 952/873 -5553 Lakeville 1996 Contact Person: Robert Erickson, City Administrator Phone: 952/985 -4400 Natural Resources Plans and Ordinances Big Lake Current Project Contact Person: Patrick Wussow, City Administrator Phone: 763/263 -2107 Lakeville 1992 Contact Person: Robert Erickson, City Administrator Phone: 952/985 -4400 Otsego 1999 Contact Person: Mike Robertson, City Administrator Phone: 7631441 -4414 Albertville Current Project Contact Person: Linda Goeb, City Administrator Phone: 7631497 -3384 Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2001 13 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies P P p Buffalo 1999 Contact Person: Merton Auger, City Administrator Phone: 7631682 -1181 Lakeville Contact Person: Phone: Oak Park Heights Contact Person: Phone: City of Shakopee 2000 Steve Michaud, Park and Recreation Director 9521985 -4400 1999 Kris Danielson, Community Development Director 6511439 -4439 Scott County Current Project Contact Person: Michael Sobota, Community Development Director Phone: 9521496 -8366 Sherburne County 1996 Contact Person: Dave Anderson, Park Committee Chair Phone: 6121241 -8257 Special Studies: Buffalo Highway 55 Frontage Road Study Buffalo Lakefront Redevelopment Contact Person: Merton Auger, City Administrator Phone: 763- 682 -0070 Lakeville Town Center Architectural and Landscape Guidelines CBD Plans Contact Person: Robert Erickson, City Administrator Phone: 952 - 985 -4401 Little Canada Contact Person: Phone: Marine on St. Croix Contact Person: Phone: Architectural Guidelines Joel Hanson, City Administrator 651- 484 -2177 Village Center Concept Plan Ginger Bolin, City Administrator 651 - 433 -3636 Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2001 14 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies A P A City of Shakopee Mendota Heights Town Center Redevelopment Study /Implementation Contact Person: Jim Danielson, Acting City Administrator Phone: 651/452-1850 New Hope 42 Avenue Redevelopment Study 42 "d Avenue Street scape City Center Market Study Winnetka Center Market Study (NAC/Wilson) Contact Person: Kirk McDonald, Community Development Director Phone: 763/531 -5100 Oak Park Heights West End Commercial Plan Contact Person: Kris Danielson, Community Development Director Phone: 6511439-4439 Wayzata Wayzata Downtown Study West Lake Street Plan Contact Person: Sarah Smith, Planner Phone: 9521474 -0234 Project Personnel NAC is a multi - disciplinary firm that will utilize a group of specialists in its team approach to the Shakopee Comprehensive Plan update and special area studies. NAC has a core of 11 employees, along with three associates. Our core staff consists of two principals offering a combined 40 years of experience in planning, design, finance and administration. Our support staff includes four senior level planners, a landscape designer /planner, a GIs specialist/planner, and two secretaries. Our three associates provide specialty expertise in areas of redevelopment, acquisition, government finance, market research, landscape architecture, and community planning. Using this team approach, NAC can provide a full range of services that may be required to complete the proposed work program. For the Shakopee project, NAC will assign two of its senior staff and two associates to guide and produce the project. Alan Brixius will lead the NAC team as project manager and will be involved in all aspects of the Comprehensive Plan process and plan development. Deborah Garross will assist and be responsible for all project meetings, plan formulation and implementation of the planning and development regulations. Anne Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2001 15 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies City of Shakopee Deuring and Cynthia Putz Yang will provide assistance in the development of conceptual site plans, architectural guidelines, and design charettes. Dan Wilson will assist the team by providing expertise in market research, finance, and redevelopment efforts. The support personnel staff will include Jason Lindahl, and secretarial staff. Alan Brixius has over 20 years of experience in comprehensive planning and development regulations preparation and implementation. He serves as the staff consultant to the Cities of Delano, New Hope, Lakeville, Lino Lakes, and Spring Park. He has recently completed comprehensive plan updates for the Cities of Lakeville, New Hope, and Lino Lakes and a zoning ordinance update for New Hope. Mr. Brixius also assisted Scott County in the development of a Comprehensive Plan update and development regulations. Alan has extensive experience in site planning, neighborhood revitalization, economic development and livable communities planning and implementation. Deborah Garross has over 16 years of experience in comprehensive planning and development regulations preparation and implementation and site planning. Prior to joining NAC, Ms. Garross served as the Assistant City Planner with the City of Prior Lake for ten years and Comprehensive Planner with the City of Woodbury. Ms. Garross currently serves as NAC's primary planner in Big Lake and Hanover. In Big Lake she has recently completed their Comprehensive Plan and is currently updating their development regulations. Ms. Garross assisted Alan Brixius in the development of the Scott County Comprehensive Plan update and development regulations and also assisted with development of the Mendota Heights Comprehensive Plan and Albertville Park and Trail Plan update. Dan Wilson is the principal of Wilson Development Services, and brings over twenty five years of experience in municipal finance and market' research. Mr. Wilson will both supervise and be directly involved with the financial aspects of the special area studies. Mr. Wilson's experience includes economic development and fiscal analysis for scores of local governments in Minnesota and Wisconsin. Recent projects include a Retail Market Study and acquisition /relocation assistance for the City of Wayzata, the Buffalo Retail /Housing Market analysis, and ongoing economic development assistance to the City of Hopkins. Anne Dearing is a NAC associate who is a registered landscape architect. Ms. Deering has had extensive experience with street scape /design gateway designs and landscape plans within transportation corridors. While employed at Westwood Professional Services, Ms. Deuring was the primary project designer for the Downtown Hopkins Streetscape Design Project, the Earle Brown Heritage Center Streescape Design and Landscape Plan and Ms. Deuring also prepared the Downtown Shakopee Streetscape Plan in 1986. Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 1uu� It. Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies City of Shakopee Cynthia Putz -Yang has been with NAC for over two and one -half years. Ms. Putz -Yang is the staff consultant to the City of Sunfish Lake. She has worked on a comprehensive plan for Marine on St. Croix and has prepared zoning ordinance updates for the City of Sunfish Lake. Ms. Putz -Yang has extensive experience in computer and presentation graphic applications in addition to landscape architecture and gateway design projects. Mason Lindahl is a Planner /GIS Specialist who has recently joined the staff at NAC after working as an Assistant Planner for the City of Anoka for two years. Mr. Lindahl has extensive experience in GIS mapping and computer graphic applications, in addition to community planning experience. As may be necessary, other staff specialists from NAC can be drawn upon if unique issues or topics arise. These needs would be determined as the project progresses. Resumes of the staff team members are included in the proposal. Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 1uui 17 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies City of Shakopee Following is a breakdown of our estimated project budget for the Shakopee Comprehensive Plan Update and special area studies. The plan and special area studies have been divided into separate projects due to the fact that we anticipate conducting a general update of the Comprehensive Plan while spending considerably more time developing the special area studies. The fees include all charges, including staff work, expenses, attendance at a total of 22 City meetings for the Comprehensive Plan, and the cost of printing all draft reports and other materials. The cost of printing final copies of the Comprehensive Plan is not included in this project budget due to the uncertain nature of the final documents, such as color printing and document length. Upon request, a representative estimate can be generated. Preliminary Analysis Senior Staff: 45 hours @ $80 per hour = $ 3,600.00 $ 6,100.00 Support Staff: 50 hours @ $50 per hour = $ 2,500.00 Land Use Options Senior Staff: 50 hours @ $80 per hour = $ 4,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Support Staff: 20 hours @ $50 per hour = $ 1,000.00 Character Sketches Senior Staff: 100 hours @ $80 per hour = $8,000.00 $12,000.00 Support Staff: 80 hours @ $50 per hour = $4,000.00 Plan Development Senior Staff: Support Staff: Comprehensive Plar Senior Staff: Support Staff: Expenses* 145 hours @ $80 per hour = $11,600.00 $14,850.00 65 hours @ $50 per hour = $ 3,250.00 i Update 100 hours @ $80 per hour = $ 8,000.00 $10,000.00 40 hours @ $50 per hour = $ 2,000.00 $ 2.600.00 TOTAL: $50,550.00 * The expenses in this category include all costs for mileage and other travel related expenses, including travel lime to and from meetings and inventory fieldwork. Printing expenses in this quote include the cost of prinfing preliminary drafts of the plan or its individual elements. Attendance at meefings in addition to those listed in the project schedule will be billed on a time and expenses basis as indicated in the NA rate schedule on the following page. A copy of the documents and maps will be provided on diskette. Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2001 18 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies P"A City of Shakopee NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, RATE SCHEDULE f;1 Staff Member Rate Per Hour Principals (Directors) .............. ............................... $65.00 to $120.00 Associates .............................. ............................... $50.00 to $120.00 Senior Analyst ........................ ............................... Senior Landscape Architect .... ............................... Senior Planner ........................ ............................... $50.00 to $90.00 Senior Urban Designer ........... ............................... Senior Public Administration Specialist ................. Analyst.................................... ............................... GISSpecialist ........................... ............................... Landscape Architect ............... ............................... Planner ................................... ............................... $20.00 to $60.00 UrbanDesigner ...................... ............................... Public Administration Specialist ............................ Aide........................................ ............................... Technician .............................. ............................... $15.00 to $40.00 Secretary................................. ............................... Outside Consultants .............. ............................... Supplies................................ ............................... Mileage................................... ............................... Expert Testimony .................... ............................... Per Job Basis Actual Cost + 15% $35 Per Mile Hourly Rate - Minimum Charge $500.00 Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2001 19 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies Pt's City of Shakopee As shown below, a chart of the Comprehensive Plan update process is provided. We have illustrated a work schedule which develops a plan document for adoption by March 2002. This is an aggressive schedule due to the significant amount of information and decision - making that will be involved in the process. NAC is committed to meeting this schedule, and has devoted sufficient senior and support staff toward that end. The primary sacrifices of shorter schedules are typically in the time available to review draft documents, and the flexibility in meeting scheduling. However, a more cohesive process will often result, leading to a superior product. To compensate for this concern, NAC will propose to undertake an intensive organizational and communication program so as to assure a full understanding of the issues and decisions at all levels, including the public, staff, and City officials. Moreover, NAC will maintain schedules and provide information in a manner which allows for efficient review by the City. With a clear time line, and effective communication both within the community and between the community and the consultant, the City should have the informational necessary to make the many decisions which are encountered in the comprehensive planning process. Award Contract # Project Initiation Conference Planning Commission Meeting /Workshops (with City Council and public invited) Public Hearings * City Council Approval Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2009 20 PROJECT SCHEDULE Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2002 2002 2002 Issues Identification n Inventory Policy Planning 9 ment Development P k Framework Implementation >?'< <I » Award Contract # Project Initiation Conference Planning Commission Meeting /Workshops (with City Council and public invited) Public Hearings * City Council Approval Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2009 20 Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies P"A City of Shakopee Resumes: Alan Brixius Deborah Garross Dan Wilson Anne Deuring Cynthia Putz -Yang Jason Lindahl Project Examples: Lakeville Comprehensive Plan and Growth Management Monticello Comprehensive Plan Update Wayzata Lake Street West End Streetscape Duluth Canal Park Drive Streetscape Architectural Design Guidelines Streetscape Projects Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. June 2001 21 I li w .t r f1 Staff Member Rate Per Hour Principals (Directors) .............. ............................... $65.00 to $120.00 Associates .............................. ......... ...................... $50.00 to $120.00 SeniorAnalyst ..... ............... .......... . . . . .. ....... ........... Senior Landscape Architect .... ............................... Senior Planner ........................ ............................... $50.00 to $90.00 Senior Urban Designer ........... ............................... Senior Public Administration Specialist ................. Analyst.................................... ..... .......................... GISSpecialist ......................................................... Landscape Architect ............... ............................... Planner ........................................ ....... ................... $20.00 to $60.00 Urban Designer.... ................................................. Public Administration Specialist ............................ Aide........................................ ............................... Technician .......... $15.00 to $40.00 Secretary................................ ......... ................. . . . .. Outside Consultants ............... ............................... Supplies................................ ............................... Mileage................................... ............................... Expert Testimony .................... ......... ......... ............. Per Job Basis Actual Cost + 15% ,$.35 Per Mile Hourly Rate - Minimum Charge $500.00 CITY OF SHAKOPEE ,Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: Employee Termination DATE: August 28, 2001 (;iii3SENT The Council is asked to terminate Recreation Supervisor John Lehner effective October 23, 2001. John Lehner was hired by the City of Shakopee on January 31, 2001, as Recreation Supervisor in charge of aquatics. On July 3I' he was notified that his probationary period was being extended by up to an addition 90 days. On August 24` Facilities and Recreation Director Mark Themig and I met with Mr. Lehner to advise him that we are recommending that his employment be terminated due to an inability to satisfactorily perform the job duties of the position. Because Mr. Lehner is a Veteran, the effective date of this would be October 23, 2001, unless he chooses to resign before then. Since his notification on August 24` he has been suspended with pay. I recommend that John Lehner be terminated from his job as Recreation Supervisor for the City of Shakopee, effective October 23, 2001. • ► • )iN l RPPROVC Ede Notice o'-�- /�,teHt t o If the Council concurs, it should, by motion, erminate John Lehner as Recreation Supervisor effective October 23, 2001. MMAh CC: Mark Themig A �f" Mark McNeill City Administrator Marilyn Remer S F. s CITY OF TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SUBJECT: Shakopee Rotary Club Premises Permit DATE: August 28, 2001 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Cu l The Shakopee Rotary Club is making application to obtain a premises permit in order to sell pull tabs at Pablo's Mexican Restaurant, 230 South Lewis Street. The Rotary Club is currently licensed to sell pull tabs at Turtle's Bar and Grill, Pullman Club and Arnie's Bar. The permit will ultimately be issued by the State Gambling Control Board. When application is made, the Board requires that the local unit of government pass a resolution specifically approving or denying the application. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Offer Resolution No. 5576, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Approving Premises Permit for the Shakopee Rotary Club, and move its adoption. JSC /j s Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 5576 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF APPROVING PERMIT FOR SHAKOPEE ROTARY WHEREAS, the 1990 legislature adopted a law which requires municipal approval in order for the Gambling Control Board to issue or renew premises permits; and WHEREAS, the Shakopee Rotary Club is seeking a Premises Permit for the site at Pablo's Mexican Restaurant, 230 South Lewis Street, Shakopee, Minnesota. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: That the Premises Permit for the Shakopee Rotary Club at Pablo's Mexican Restaurant, 230 South Lewis Street, Shakopee, Minnesota, be approved. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, this 4th day of September, 2001. - Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk l �_ CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM Judith S. Cox, City Clerk { = - __... SUBJECT: On Sale Intoxicating Liquor License — Great Lakes, Inc. DATE: August 31, 2001 INTRODUCTION: City Council is asked to consider an application of Great Lakes, Inc., DBA Shakopee Ballroom, for an on sale intoxicating liquor license and for a set -up license (consumption and display license). BACKGROUND: Great Lakes, Inc. has made application for an on sale intoxicating liquor license at 2400 East e Avenue. Great Lakes, Inc. is purchasing the ballroom from Shakopee Ballroom and Banquet Center, Inc. They also desire to obtain a consumption and display license. The Police Department has conducted the background investigation. The investigation has produced nothing that would prohibit the issuance of the licenses. The evidence of liquor liability insurance and fees for the licenses have not yet been received. No license will be delivered until after these are received which will be shortly after the closing on the business. The application for the liquor license was advertised for Council consideration on August 21, 2001, at which time it was tabled because it was not in order. It should be removed from the table before any action is taken. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Remove from the table the application from Great Lakes, Inc. for an on -sale intoxicating liquor license. 2. Approve the application and grant on sale intoxicating liquor license to Great Lakes, Inc., DBA Shakopee Ballroom, 2400 East 4 Avenue, conditioned upon surrender of the existing license and meeting all conditions of the city code. 3. Approve the application and grant a consumption and display license to Great Lakes, Inc., DBA Shakopee Ballroom, 2400 East e Avenue, conditioned upon meeting all conditions of the city code JSC /jms I: Jeanette/Liquor /GreatL akes CM OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SUBJECT: On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Great Lakes, Inc. DATE: September 4, 2001 INTRODUCTION: . The applicant, Great Lakes, Inc., for an on -sale intoxicating liquor license has asked that the application be tabled to the September 18, 2001, City Council meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Remove from the table the application from Great Lakes, Inc. for an on -sale intoxicating liquor license. 2. Table the on -sale intoxicating liquor license application from Great Lakes, Inc., 2400 East 4 th Avenue, until September 18, 2001. Judith S. Cox, City Clerk / 5 F- 3 1& CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum Ot a ih�,! S E N T TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: Copier Purchase DATE: August 29, 2001 The City Council is asked to authorize purchase of a Minolta digital copier from Loffler Companies, in the amount of $17,297.73. The FY 2001 budget includes $17,000 for a replacement photocopier. The copier to be replaced is the one which currently does Council packets; it is six -years old, and has 1,103,854 copies on it. It is in need of replacement, due to frequent breakdowns. Staff examined a number of copiers, and is recommending that a Minolta Di -620 Digital Copier be obtained. It has several features that will be useful to the City operation. The old copier will be traded in. The price for this copier was obtained from the State bid price; therefore, it has met the competitive quote process. BUDGET IMPACT: Total cost is $17,297.73, which includes delivery, installation and training. $17,000 was provided in the budget for this. If the Council concurs, it should, by motion, authorize the purchase of a Minolta Di -620 Digital Copier from Loffler Companies, in the amount of $17,297.73. Mark McNeill City Administrator ula 15 F a CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: City Hall/Police Property - Acquisition DATE: August 28, 2001 The Council is asked to authorize an appraisal be done for the purpose of an offer to purchase a one acre parcel of land located adjacent to the site currently in condemnation action for the new Police /City Hall site. On September 27 and 28 a condemnation panel will hear information to determine a value for a 5.439 acre parcel of land located across from the current Public Services building on Gorman Street. This property would be the site of a new Police Station, to begin construction in Spring of next year. Recently, a decision was also made to add a new City Hall as a second phase, and not to locate it on a site located west of the Stans Museum. Attached is a conceptual drawing (exhibit #1), which shows how a Police Station, and how the potential City Hall might fit. As shown, it does; however, in the opinion of the architect, it would be a "tight" site with little green space. An option to relieve some of the crowding would be to acquire a 1 -acre parcel of land that is adjacent to the south and east, owned by Shakopee 84 Partnership. I spoke with the owner of that parcel, to inquire as to the asking price. With assessments, he said that it was $155,000. It is zoned commercial (B -1). He is interested in selling to the City, and indicated that he would be flexible how a price might be determined. There are two options: Wait until the condemnation panel for the 5.439 -acre parcel establishes a value. This would then be basis of beginning negotiations with the Shakopee 84 Partnership. However, the owner does correctly note that that is a smaller parcel, and therefore may have a different per acre value. Both sites are zoned B -1 commercial. 2. Direct that an appraisal be done, as an offering price to the owner. The owner could chose to accept, or, that could be then the basis for an eminent domain hearing, should the Council so chose to proceed. 17 D' I recommend that a full appraisal be done of the Shakopee 84 Partnership property. It is expected to take 4 to 6 weeks, and the cost will not exceed $4500. If the Council concurs, it should, by motion, direct that staff order an appraisal be done of the Shakopee 84 Partnership vacant lot, located on Gorman Street, east of the Police Station subject property. Mark McNeill City Administrator MM:th CD I L®r GP P C/) V Ix 3 II a- LLJ LLJ n T13 752 1. D—/ CD CD yN o - I U I CD U U I ( °O C> CD C) . Is —J �o CD —J tD U CD U CD rT*I) CU Li CU �� i� i i 1 e ', c ----------- U3 CD CD CD c CC) 3 oi I ED bi A —X—X CC) CL 11MOVIAM. X CD LLJ 2: ,D < CD E CY CY < =1 0- •'l < 0i CD C/) CD LLJ CD :E D/ oll cu LLJ C/O Lj Q� CD CL Lj CD F— <z CL C I D CD LLJ Ctf CD O cr� Li f f� Cu �o -V U X =D al Li CL G G I IPPLP Ix !"C-1 MNWL CD I L®r GP P C/) V Ix 3 II a- LLJ LLJ n T13 752 1. D—/ CD CD yN o - I U I CD U U I ( °O C> CD C) . Is —J �o CD —J tD U CD U CD rT*I) CU Li CU �� i� i i 1 e ', c ----------- U3 CD CD CD c CC) 3 oi I ED bi A —X—X CC) CL 11MOVIAM. X CD LLJ 2: ,D < CD E CY CY < =1 0- •'l < 0i CD C/) CD LLJ CD :E D/ oll cu LLJ C/O Lj Q� CD CL Lj CD F— <z CL C I D CD LLJ Ctf CD O cr� Li f f� Cu CD 0 CD 0 CL CD IGN LLJ N Li 0i Li PPLP u CD CD CD Ln CD CU N CD d CD Gp MNWL w C4 cu — 1 4 Lj C � j cu CD LLJ Li Z CD cu LD cu Ln CD CLI ` ! � ` ( | � . . �- ! TPAMC F. CITY OF SHAK ®PEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: 2001 EDA Tax Levy Consent Resolution No. 5574 DATE: August 28, 2001 Introduction Attached is Resolution Number 5574, which consents to the EDA tax levy. Background State law MSA 469.107 provides that the City Council may levy a tax at the request of the EDA for economic development purposes. Further, MSA 469.033 provides that the City Council may consent to a levy by the EDA for redevelopment purposes. Accordingly, the attached resolution is provided for Council action. Action Offer Resolution Number 5574, A Resolution Levying A Tax At The Request Of, And Consenting To The Levy Of A Tax By, The Economic Development Authority For The City Of Shakopee, and move its adoption. regg Voxland Finance Director g: \budget02 \budres02 RESOLUTION NO. 5574 A RESOLUTION LEVYING A TAX AT THE REQUEST OF, AND CONSENTING TO THE LEVY OF A TAX BY, THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority for the City of Shakopee was created pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.091 et. seq., as amended, and WHEREAS, Section 469.107 states the governing body of the municipality may levy a tax at the request of the Authority, and WHEREAS, Section 469.033 states that for redevelopment purposes, the Economic Development Authority may levy a tax with the consent of the governing municipality, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the City Council levies a special tax of $60,880 pursuant to MSA 469.107 to be collected in 2002 for the Economic Development Authority by the City of Shakopee. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Shakopee consents to a special tax levy of $20,300 pursuant to MSA 469.033 to be collected in 2002 by the Economic Development Authority. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of September, 2001. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk JS F. (�. City of Shakopee Memorandum TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: 2002 Proposed Tax Levy and Budget Resolution DATE: August 28, 2001 Introduction Attached is Resolution Number 5575, which sets the proposed maximum 2001/2002 tax levy. Time frames The existing law requires that Shakopee certify a proposed budget, budget hearing date and proposed maximum tax levy to the county by September 15 . The City has to certify the final levy to the county by December 28, 2001- Changes Two changes have been made for the General Fund tax levy from information previously discussed. One is that the $33,000 special levy authority for tax abatement projects does not apply to the current Shakopee situation. Second, in getting the estimated levy limit, the state and I had used the actual transit tax levy for the previous year (certified in September 2000) in the calculations. The tax levy certified to the state in June 2000 was the maximum levy which was used to get the actual levy limit. The result of both items is that the actual levy limit is $130,187 less than estimated. The General Fund budget status currently is a deficit of $22,860 which can be resolved by; 1. leaving it as it is showing a deficit budget 2. expenditures reduced 3. revenues increased 4. use fund balance including the $20,000 for imaging system not used 5. Count on under spending the budget as has been done previously This issue does not have to resolved now because the tax levy will be the maximum allowed and the final budget will not be adopted until December. Tax Levy The proposed maximum tax levy for 2001/02 is a General Fund levy of $6,590,773 plus a debt service levy of $156,760. The General Fund levy last year was $3,661,763 including $234,586 for debt service. The increase in the gross levy for the General Fund (excluding debt service) is $3,163,596 or 920_ The large increase is partly due to the loss of state aids and the overhaul of the property tax system by the state. Other factors include reduction of the SPUC contribution and the rapid growth of the city. Additionally, the part of the EDA levy for economic development purposes in the amount of $60,880 will be shown as a General Fund levy as per the State Department of Revenue_ Last year the amount was $47,010_ Total levy for the EDA yields a balanced budget_ The transit levy for local transit services has been eliminated and replaced by funding from the Met Council. The total tax levy by the city on the tax capacity (including general fund, EDA and debt service but excluding fire station bonds debt service) is an estimated increase of $2,590,143 or 60 %, from $4,216,020 to $6,826,163. The decision to reduce the levy can be made at a later date because it is the maximum proposed levy being adopted now. The levy for the fire station bonds is already set by previous action and is increasing from $261,939 to $267,068. However, due to the accumulation of funds from the 5% over -levy requirement and interest earnings, it is reduced to $125,000 for next year. This levy is on the market value of real estate and not the tax capacity value. Governmental Funds Budget The Council is required to certify a proposed budget to the County Auditor by September 15 Council may change the amount up or down for the final budget. The resolution includes the Governmental Funds Budget proposed expenditures in the amount of $18,414,086 (net of special assessments per State Auditor). The budget is not fixed_ The comparable number last year was $18,764,334. Alternati 1. Adopt resolution as drafted. 2. Increase or decrease amounts for tax levy or budget in the resolution. Action Offer Resolution Number 5575, A Resolution Setting Proposed Maximum 2001 Tax Levy, Collectable In 2002, and move its adoption. Giegg Voxland Finance Director g: \budget02 \budres02 City of Shakopee, Minnesota 2002 Annual Combined Budget Summary General Fund Special Debt Revenue Service Funds Funds Capital Total Projects Governmental Funds Funds Revenues Taxes Licenses And Permits Intergovernmental Federal State Local Charges For Service Fines And Forfiets Miscellaneous Revenue Interest Earnings TOTAL Revenue Expenditures General Government Public Safety Public Works Recreation Debt Service Miscellaneous Total Expenditures Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures Other Financing Sources And (Uses) Bond Proceeds Interfund Transfers In Interfund Transfers (Out) Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues and Other Sources Over Expenditures and Other Uses Property Tax Levy Required to Support This Budget $6,639,460 $ 81,180 $ 1,516,760 $ 15,345,500 $ 23,582,900 1,570,350 540,000 2,110,350 45,000 45,000 297,660 437,000 654,000 1,388,660 25,000 25,000 1,558,700 70,000 1,628,700 200,000 200,000 91,000 1,190,000 1,281,000 250,000 28,000 136,900 291,950 706,850 10,677,170 616,180 1,653,660 18,021,450 30,968,460 3,022,740 317,180 3,339,920 4,261,400 4,261,400 1,826,690 603,870 15,730,000 18,160,560 678,800 1,920,000 2,598,800 3,674,774 3,674,774 848,630 1,353,000 2,201,630 10,638,260 921,050 3,674,774 19,003,000 34,237,084 38,910 (304,870) (2,021,114) (981,550) (3,268,624) 725,000 (786,770) 33,000 483,000 (30,520) 0 1,241,000 (817,290) $ (22,860) $ (271,870) $ (1,568,634) $ (981,550) $ (2,844,914) $ 6,590,773 $ 81,180 $ 281,760 $ - $ 6,953,713 RESOLUTION NO. 5575 A RESOLUTION SETTING PROPOSED MAXIMUM 2001 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 2002 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, COUNTY OF SCOTT, MINNESOTA, that the following amounts be levied as the proposed maximum tax levy in accordance with existing law for the current year upon the taxable property in the City of Shakopee; General Levy $6,590,773 Plus Economic Development Authority $ 60,880 Debt Service Levy $ 156,760 Debt Service - Fire Referendum $ 125,000 (Market Value) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proposed expenditures for the Governmental Funds Budget for 2002 is $18,414,086. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy to this resolution to the County Auditor of Scott County, Minnesota. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of September, 2001. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk City of Shakopee Memorandum TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Canceling Debt Service Levies For 2001/02 DATE: August 27, 2001 Introduction Resolution No. 5577 cancels debt service levies for certain bond issues that have currently have adequate funding. Background Attached is the resolution canceling debt service levies for taxes payable in 2002. No provision is made for a tax levy in pay 2002 for the upcoming improvement bond issue. Requested Action Offer Resolution No. 5577 A Resolution Canceling Debt Service Levies For 2001/02, and move its adoption. 'Z� Gregg Voxland Finance Director g: \budget02 \budres02 RESOLUTION NO. 5577 A RESOLUTION CANCELING DEBT SERVICE LEVIES FOR 2001/02 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, COUNTY OF SCOTT, MINNESOTA, that the following debt service levies are canceled: 1992A Improvement Bonds $ 20,778 1995B G.O. Revenue Bonds 158,330 1996A Improvement Bonds 76,089 1997B Improvement Bonds 32,398 199813 Improvement Bonds 66,096 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following tax levies be made for taxes payable in 2002: 1991A Improvement Bonds $36,495 1995A Improvement Bonds 62,715 2000A Improvement Bonds 57,550 1997 Building Bonds 125,000 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy to this resolution to the County Auditor of Scott County, Minnesota. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of September, 2001. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk t CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: Special Meeting DATE: August 29, 2001 The Council is asked set a special Council meeting on September 10 to consider pay plan issues. BACKGROUND: In July, the Council set a number of dates to deal with budget issues, including two in September —Thursday, September 6 and Monday, September 10 Because work on the budget proceeded more quickly than anticipated, the Council is able to adopt the maximum tax levy at the September 4 meeting. There is, however, a need for the Council to meet in one of those pre - determined sessions. Consultant Rod Kelsey has requested from 30 to 60 minutes to follow -up on the earlier presentation on the pay plan, and have Council adopt it at that meeting. In addition, the Public Works Director and Police Department would like to discuss parking restrictions during snow emergencies. If other topics for a workshop present themselves they may be added to this meeting. ACTION REQUIRED: The Council is asked to set a special meeting date for 5:00 pm, Monday, September 10 to consider pay plan issues. P� /*VW Mark McNeill City Administrator I Y, F_ . City of Shakopee Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Tracy Coenen, Management Assistant SUBJECT: Exemption to Garbage Service— Christopher Henderson MEETING DATE: September 4, 2001 Introduction Mr. Christopher Henderson is requesting City Council to grant him an exemption to Ordinance No. 594 that mandates garbage and recycling pickup for single- family dwellings located that are served by MUSA. Background Mr. Henderson contacted me on August 30, 2001 to indicate, as in his memo, that he did not want and/or need the City's garbage service, because he uses his parents garbage service. I explained to Mr. Henderson, that as city staff, I would not grant his exemption for two reasons 1) it did not follow City Ordinance No. 594 that mandates garbage and recycling pickup service for single family dwellings in MUSA (he resides at 225 Bluestein Avenue, which is served by city water and sewer) and 2) it is not consistent with City Council's precedent, set on March 27, 2001, when City Council denied Mr. Allen Hastings request for an exemption for similar reasons. I informed him that he could make an appeal to the City Council at the September 4 meeting. Staff Recommendation Deny Mr. Henderson's request for an exemption for the garbage service with Dick's Sanitation. This will help to maintain the uniformity and equity of the citywide garbage service. Action Required 1) Deny Mr. Henderson's request for an exemption to the City's garbage service (Ordinance No. 594). 2) Grant Mr. Henderson's exemption to no longer be a part of the citywide garbage service contract. 3) Table. Trac % �enen Y Management Assistant Aug -30 - 2001 11:45am From- UNITEDHEALTH GROUP 952 - 883 -6190 T -110 P.002/002 F -011 Christopher D Henderson 225 Hluestem Ave. Shakopee, MN 553 79 952833 -615 Thsons for this is that I Dear Council Members, I am requesting an exemption for garbage service The small . e rea live alone and do not generate enough garbage for me to d land housely I cannot afford it. amount of garbage I do have I am able to simply brig y parents Thank you for your consideration, i Christopher D. Henderson bN TAVbLZ To: Mayor and City Council From: Mark McNeill, City Administrator Subject: Skate Park Landscaping Date: September 4, 2001 •I 1 Council should be aware that some neighbors of the Skate Park facility have called to complain about noise from the Skate Park. The major concern is on the "thump" that occurs when the skates go from the asphalt surface to the composite ramps. The Police Dept was asked to determine if the sound violated the City's noise ordinance. They monitored on two occasions at four locations; including some locations in the - adjacent neighborhood. While the "thumps" are audible, they did not violate the noise ordinance. Mark Themig is contacting the manufacturer of the ramps to see if there is anything that can be done to muffle the noise. I did not receive a response from him prior to his leaving on vacation. He returns September 17'. An alternative that is also being looked at is to construct a fence along the top of the berm to act as a sound wall. Using the same materials and construction methods as was done on the CR 17 fence for the five houses across from the hospital, 220 feet of that fencing would costs $11,000. In addition, there would be some changes needed to the sprinkler system already in place. I do not know whether there would be an appreciable difference in the sound as a result of the construction of a wall. It might benefit those residents directly across the street from the Skate Park, but there can be no assurances of that without a professional study being done. It will likely not change things for those living further up or down the street. One other problem with a fence would be that it would reduce visibility for drive -by surveillance. We will continue to work to find a solution, but the Public Works crew needs some direction now so that the landscaping can get finished. The original plan was to put — n shrubs and trees on the berm. We propose to have the crew do that now; if the decision is later made to place a fence along the top, those plantings will have to be moved. I would appreciate any thoughts that you have on this. The PRAB will likely be discussing the noise issue at their next meeting, but that will not take place until September 24 We would like to have the landscaping finished before then. U/sAAL Mark McNeill City Administrator ffITITEC M4ff M Volume Data +Aevant Intersection Data MMOMMM Engineering Department City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (952) 445-3650 • ' Il 1 • City of Shakopee 2001 Traffic Data Table of Contents CoverSheet .................................. ............................... ...........................Page 1 Tableof Contents.......... Page ........................................ ..............................P g 2 -3 Recommendations........................... ............................... ...........................Page 4 -6 StudyMemo ................................ ............................... ...........................Page 7 -8 Shakopee Stop Sign Policy Pages 9 -14 Location Map ...................................................... ............................... ...Page 15 Study #1: Pheasanst Run Overview ..... ............................... ..........................Pages 16 -18 Study #I a: Pheasant Run Street and Mathias Ave ................... ..........................Pages 19 -30 Study #lb: Pheasant Run Street and Blue Jay Street ................ ..........................Pages 31 -39 Study #lc: Pheasant Run Street and Quail Drive ..................... ..........................Pages 40 -48 Study #ld: Pheasant Run Street and Ponds Way ..................... ..........................Pages 49 -58 Study #2: Barrington Drive .............. ............................... ..........................Pages 59 -67 Study #3: Vierling Drive Accesses ...... ............................... ..........................Pages 68 -84 Study #4: Valley Park Drive and 12' Ave ............................ ..........................Pages 85 -92 Study #5: Adams Street Overview ...... ............................... ..........................Pages 93 -94 Study #5a: Adams and 6 th Ave .......... ............................... ..........................Pages 95 -103 FA Study #5b: Adams and 4 th Ave ......... ............................... ..........................Pages 104 -111 Study #6: Market Street and ShakopeeAve ......................... ..........................Pages 112 -122 DATE: August 29, 2001 T®: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director FROM: Dale Gade, Engineering Intern SUBJECT: 2001 Stop Sign Study After studying the intersections listed in this report, recommendations have been made for three intersections in the City of Shakopee. Traffic Study #1: Due to the existing traffic pattern in the Pheasant Run development area using French Trace, Quail Drive, and Pheasant Run Street as minor collectors. My recommendation is to install stop signs on adjoining local collector streets to help enforce the rule of right -of -way. Doing so will reduce the number of accidents which will rise due to continual development of the Pheasant Run area. Traffic Study #2: Barrington Drive currently has a speeding problem. Speed limit signs are posted per city guidelines. Stop signs in this area is not a feasible option. My recommendation is further police enforcement. Traffic Study #3: The accesses to Vierling Drive do have a high traffic volume resulting in the rule of right-of-way being ignored, which creates an increased risk of accidents. This intersection is currently under further study. Traffic Study #4: After further investigation, Valley Park Drive and 12` Avenue is operating within expectable allowances. There is no history of accident problems, no speeding and no high pedestrian traffic. My recommendation is to study this intersection again when the business district is more developed. Traffic Study #5a The intersection of Adams Street and 6th Avenue, currently a 2 -way stop, meets 2 of 5 requirements for a 4 -way stop sign installation. However, 3 of 5 requirements must be met to justify a 4 -way stop sign installation. While accident history does not show a rule of right -of- way problem, there is a significant speeding problem. My recommendation is for further police enforcement and for future study of this intersection. All other data collected in the studies in this manual should be kept on city file for future reference and possible traffic control changes. lal'A I- z Q W n El 0 PONDS WAY W T Al y lz <�,' PHEASANT RUN N N T W 'S- Q _ L-4J u z W Q lL 1S NIZVZJVS d N 0 C CM CL O Q i n. O 0 �In u I— L� z I- P W O n a n F.ls dla�dQ F ViFIS3N NIN J- 'is i3> NVN > 1 n 11 L CC ,,(] D F > F7 7�-3 L1 r �91 -P 0 I • III LD z <I z n ED rK Cl- AL YSB ssociares. Inc- 4 0 Olson Memorial Highway S, e 300 Minneapolis N nesota 5422 7F'- 541.4800 7 - 541.1700 FAX To: Bruce Loney, P.E. Public Works Director City of Shakopee From: Charles T. Rickart, P.E. Transportation Engineer Date: August 13, 2001 Re: Pheasant Ruiz Street Traffic Study Review SB Project loo. 1281 -20 As requested, I have reviewed the intersection studies your staff completed for the intersections along Pheasant Run Street. Based on my review, I offer the following comments: 1. Pheasant Run Street from Valley View Road to Quail Drive and, Quail Drive from Pheasant Run Street to Sarazin Street are currently acting as local collectors based on the existing traffic volumes and pattern of traffic. 2. With additional development in this area, traffic volumes will continue to increase. ffi Pheasant Run Street will provide the major access to Valley View Road and Quail Drive to Sarazin Street, for this future traffic. 3. Based on the review of the traffic volume data, it appears that when Valley View Road is paved, additional traffic will travel south along Pheasant Run Street to Valley View Road. 4. Currently, based on the existing traffic volume data and crash data along the corridor, most of the intersections along Pheasant Run Street do not meet two -way or all -way stop signs warrants. Based on the above conclusions, I would recommend the following: 1. Although the intersections along Pheasant Run Street and Quail Avenue do not meet stop sign warrants, two -say stops should be considered, stopping the cross streets. Based on the existing traffic movements, this is the pattern that most vehicles would be expected in this area. This will be proactive anticipating future traffic growth on this roadway_ 2. The intersection of Pheasant Run Street and Quail Drive signed as a one - should be way stop, stopping the westbound approach on Quail Drive to Pheasant Run Street. This would also require additional signing indicating that the other specific movements do not stop. Minneapolis St. Cloud - Equal Opportunity Employer Mr. Bruce Loney City of Shakopee August 13, 2001 Page 2 3. Future all -way stops at Quail and Mathias Avenue should be considered after this area has fully developed. If you have any questions or comments concerning my review of these traffic studies, please contact me at (763) 287 -7183. FAwpwin \1281 -20 \08130 bl_doc 'z'rafnc Conditions: The traffic conditions of an intersection include: • Traffic approach volume; Q he intersection; ® Speed of zatnc approaching Number of turning vehicles in an intersection; ® Vehicle makeup (i.c. tntctts, buses, etc.) To�oara�hic Conditions: The topographic conditions of the intersections are the physical features in the area, including: Bade of each approaching roadway; Location and size of adjacent buildings or strictures; . Angle of the intersection; ® Ceome nCs (number of lanes) of the intersection; ® If s school, nark or _najor pedestrian �enerater is located in the area HLgnan Factors: Human factors are very difficult to define - They can include: The age of a drive: How a driver responds to certain situations; ® physical attributes of the driver Based on these conditions and factors, potential intersec ezin�whattype ofmtersectiontcontrol determined- Several techniques have been developed .o i are is warranted at a spev.nc location. policies for two -way and all-way stop sib discussed below. Shakopee Slgmisg secdon 11 WSB Projea No. 1014..6 tersection Control Policies: When .. - ,• ,_ + es f or and sig c ontrolled intm=ctions, me c ond i tions • •: • • • J • h co nditions • :a • di • m r. • a h uman r. •, of the n. en t should be utilized when evaluating th engineenn • • a = Analysis Procedure: the nerd and location of two -way or all -way stop sign control can The best procedure in evaluating 4 Section 2B -5. be found in the Minnesota Manual on U o T�� �� oP p �� o procedures should Based on those warrants, the followin� Y be followed: Step I: Request for intersec control evaluation T•nis request can come from ether a resident, the City Council, or from s observation of tion_ If a reques es , de of o e intersection, must aparticslar intersec ccorLpanv heoeq� 80 ° ,'0 of the house: ^.olds :vithin 3 ,00 . A stop sign installation :_quest form is included in Appendix D- Sten ,- Data collection should be conducte First phase This step in the procedure aluation p tep and the send phase t o would collectina the data necessar! for the initi be the data collectior. required for a c intersection control stu (Step 4). T'ne data required for each phase is listed below. Ph -- A - sae Daily T,-,T=-!-c - VoluTne data. Accident summarY- Initial site visit Phase_= Traffic speed- ® Vehicle classification- . Pedestrian data ® Intersection topoaphic information gr Detailed accident data. shakapee Sigtsing s ccsoR A WSB Proj"r .Vo- 1014.-'S ® Detailed site visit viewing the intersection operations for the peak hours of a typical day- I nit i al ... An initial o f t h e intersection should be co mpleted to determine if a detailed i control study should be performed. This evalualion is something that can be traffic • . ie as •. • r• • road geometr T'nis procedure is as follows: a A. um traffic volume: If a daily volume of more than 1000 vehicles per day on all combined approaches exists, the intersection is a candidate for an intersection control study or, B. Accident history: If there are snore than two reported accidents per year in the previous two years or, three accidents in the previous 12 month period, of a type that is core table with stop si control �I.e. rrgnt angle or turning in front of another vehicle), an intersection is a candidate for an intersection control - if the intersec does not meet these requirements ao further study will be completed without direction from cirr council. A letter to the resident requesting the information, outlining he =s wlll'oe sent by the Public tiVorts Director. This letter will include the City's policies for appeal of the eng -nuts decision. Sten 1 : Inte -secnon Control Study If the initial evaluation concludes that an intersection control study is necessary, the following procedures wiil'oe `oilo�ved to deter- nine xhich type of tr:r =lc control is required. A Irterseczon overar_on analysis: T'nis would involve analyzing the operation ofthe intersection using he c,urentversion ofthe High`Nay Capaci tiianual. to determine the Level of Service and potential delays on specific approaches. 'r' analysis can be conducted for either a two -way or four -way stop sign controlled intersection. Shakopee Signing ' Seci= a Wyg project Na 1014.6 B. Cone ' IArterial Intersections: The analysis procedure should only be used for the ' ections of collector or arterial roadways. The =al Proc as outl in the MnMT - TCD should be conducted to determine if a two -way or four -way stop signed controlled intersection should be h These proce3tires are as follows: •q'w�wav stov sign controlled intersection I. Intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right -of -way road is unduly hazardo or, 2 Street entering a through highway or street or, 3. Unsignalized intersection in a signalized area or, 4. A combination of high speed restricted sight distance and serious accident history indicating a need for control by a stop sip or, All-wav 5.100 sisn control: I W - here 7affic siais ar° .yr =ed '-r rgPnt�y ze°ded, the all -way stop can be an meter= measure or. ?_ An accident problem ndicarng that ave or more reported accidents of a type susceatibie to correction by a multi -way stop sign installation in a 12 -7ncnth pe ^.od or, 3. lviinimum trartc volumes: a. A total vehic•,tlar-rolumeehtering the ntersection from encroaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any eiQnt hours of an average day and b_ The combined vehicular and oedes�: an volurne from the minor street or nigh- must average at least 200 units per hour for the same eght hours, with an o ;r..l.cr i see... o vemc traffic .:lar trac of at ', least 30 seconds per, vehicle during the maximum hour but C. When the 81 approach geed of the major str� t traffic exceeds 40 ', the requirements can be reduced to 70 %. C. Local Street Intersection: wo Local This analysis procedure should only be used for the intersection of t streets. This analysis uses the data as collected in Step 2 of the stop sign control policies. The analysis procedures, as outlined below, should be Shakopee Signing ' se=n Lt WSBPMjeaNO. i01A.:b con d uc ted to dettermine if a two-way or four-way stop sign controlled i should be in�ed. The procedures are as follows: I. If the major street traffic volume is more than 1000 vehicles per day and the minor street traffic volume is less than 50% of the major street traffic volume. 2. There has been more than two reported accidents, per, year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous year of a type correctable with stop sign installation. 3_ The pedestrian volumes across the minor approach (that which would be stopping) is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during the A.tif. and P.I. peak traffic hours. 4. If the safe stopping sight distance of the minor approach is res�-:cted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and %or vertical roadway aliment or by other permanent obsu.letions" If two of he Lour conditions are met. this intersection .vould be a candidate or �� o way stop sig.-r control. All -Wav Stop Sign Cont-ol 1. If the , naJor street =Ec volume is more than 1500 vehicles per day and the minor street traffic volume is greater. than 750 vehicles per day. 2. There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reposed accidents in the previous year of a type correctable with stop sign installation. 3. If the pedestrian volumes crossing any approach is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during *he A.tii. and P.If. peak traffic hours. 4 If the safe stopping sight distance on the uncontrolled approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and/or vertical roadway alignment or other permanent obstructions. 5. If the 35 percentile speed in the intersection is greater than 35mph and the highest reported speed with two or more observations is greater than 45mph. If three of the five conditions outlined above apply, this intersection is a candidate for all -way stop sign control. Shakopee Signing SdCdM II WS.8 project Na 1014.26 shakop- sigma seed= 11 WSB Pro %cG Na 1014.'6 �� , � � � �� __ } __ c _ cm �1 r, J �I dddS n< u I ? nl J 1 I tj l = r V W U .: awo� Cl w, of _, Q w -Iw w� Of �Z-J ZzDw d 2w 0-1 0 E- I - =C4 - i � ar xZ � �LJ> Q- - WQ U 1 0 �S - r - IIdHOS2NW o L � � 1$3�+ W W c.i > EVERGREEN > S Q e O U) fV O U] N II O J Q U In W W H W z W L LL L3 W z W � W a r V J W W UJ w OZ �� Engineering Department City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (952) 445 -3650 I I /.:L . ' max '. .. ate � x fiT -" .:ac , _ r-- h, .( . ' � .: � .. a pi I 1 1 Pheasant Run Street South - Heading Northbound Pheasant Run Street North - Heading Southbound I IIIIIIIIIIIIMIIMIF NC- I ; : . i I I 1 I Mathias Ave West - Heading Eastbound Mathias Ave East - Heading Westbound 1 i I Intersection Photos: SHAKOPEE III COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 Pheasant Run Street and 1 Engineering Department Mathias Ave. City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 II (952) 445 -3650 May 29, 2001 I Does the Intersection of Pheasant Run Street and INIathias Avenue Meet the Warrant for a Two-Way Stop Sign? A stop sign is warranted if two of the following four conditions exist: (Conditions are from the Shakopee Suing Manual, October 26, 1998) 1.) If the major street traffi lume is more than 1000 vehicles per day and the Minor street traffic volume is less than 50% of the major street traffic volume. The major street, Pheasant Run Street, does meet the requirement for traffic volume with an average daily count of 1476. The minor street, Mathias Avenue, has an average daily count of 731 vehicles. This intersection does meet the requirement. 2.) There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous years of a type correctable with stop sign installation. The intersection of Pheasant Run Street & Mathias Avenue had zero (0) reported accidents in 2000 and three (3) reported accidents in 2001. The intersection does not meet the requirement. However, data gathered for 2001 reflects accidents from January through May and more accidents could occur during the remainder of 2001 resulting in the requirement being met. 3.) The pedestrian volumes across the minor approach (that which would be stopping) is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during the A.M. and P.M. peak traffic hours. The intersection of Pheasant Run Street & Mathias Avenue does not meet the requirement. 4.) If the safe stopping distance of the minor approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and/or vertical roadway alignment or by other permanent obstructions. Sight distance is not an issue at this intersection. The intersection does not meet the requirement. Does 4 1 1, of 1 Run Street and Nlathias Avenul; Meet the i for 1 Stop is A stop sign is warranted if three of the following five conditions exist: (Conditions are from the Shakopee Signing Manual, October 26, 1998) 1.) If the major street traffic volume is more than 1500 vehicles per day and the minor street traffic volume is greater than 750 vehicles per day. The major street Pheasant Run Street, does not meet the requirement for traffic volume with an average daily count of 1476. The minor street, Mathias Avenue, has an average daily count of 731 vehicles. The intersection does not meet the requirement. However, construction of new housing has not yet been completed and may result in increased traffic, which could result in the conditions being met in the near future upon completion of the subdivision. 2.) 'There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous years of a type correctable with stop sign installation. The intersection of Pheasant Run Street & Mathias Avenue had zero (0) reported accidents in 2000 and three (3) reported accidents in 2001. The intersection does not meet the requirement. However, data gathered for 2001 reflects accidents from January through May and more accidents could occur during the remainder of 2001 resulting in the requirement being met. 3.) If the pedestrian volumes crossing any approach is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during the A.M. and P.M. peak traffic hours. The intersection of Pheasant Run Street & Mathias Avenue does not meet the requirement. 4.) If the safe stopping distance on the uncontrolled approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and /or vertical roadway alignment or by other ep permanent obstructions. Sight distance is not an issue at this intersection. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 5.) If the 85` percentile speed in the intersection is greater than 35mph and highest reported speed with two or more observations greater than 45mph. The speed at this intersection was found to have an 85 percentile speed of 28 mph. The intersection does not meet the requirement. av 29. 2009 �y x May J 1 LVV 1 Pheasant Pheasant M athias Mathias Time Run St. Run St Ave. (East) Ave. (West) Run St. (North) (South) Ave. (West) 14:30 64 117 27 54 15:30 69 157 33 71 16:30 80 142 21 88 17:30 87 96 32 81 18:30 62 101 21 59 19:30 55 71 10 65 20:30 40 38 10 39 21:30 23 15 9 26 22:30 5 10 10 13 23:30 7 3 4 5 0:30 2 2 1 3 1:30 0 1 0 2 2:30 0 0 0 1 3:30 0 9 0 0 4:30 8 43 5 5 5:30 32 137 1 1 6 6:30 84 130 31 68 7:30 85 90 38 66 8:30 61 78 24 41 9:30 59 84 31 33 10:30 58 120 38 40 11:30 77 115 29 54 12:30 66 112 62 67 13:30 69 115 62 44 �y x May J 1 LVV 1 Pheasant Pheasant Mathias Mathias Time Run St. Run St_ Ave. (East) Ave. (West) (North) (South) 14:30 83 149 36 56 15:30 77 167 33 98 16:30 99 147 42 96 17:30 78 127 39 94 18 :30 83 121 20 72 19 :30 73 64 22 71 20:30 35 41 16 37 21:30 14 18 9 29 22:30 6 5 1 12 23:30 4 1 4 6 0:30 0 2 0 0 1:30 0 1 0 2 2:30 0 3 1 2 3:30 1 10 0 3 4:30 9 52 4 6 5:30 38 134 5 15 6:30 82 119 22 58 7:30 81 92 36 61 8:30 55 82 31 46 9:30 61 96 36 34 10:30 58 138 36 37 11:30 104 103 34 60 12:30 75 80 35 48 13:30 58 99 41 36 CITY �w� 06-06-01 O SHAK DATE PREPARED: D aily • • Re .. [ Aivj,L,� 0 0 p MATHIAS AVE. z D a' z Q Q w smw� =� M� Total Daily Volume Entering Intersection: 4313 W a w l� �wl �M� �, � South — 41.2% North — 25.7% West — 21.7% East -- 11.4% INTERSECTION PHEASANT RUN ST. & MATHIAS AVE. IN SHAKOPEE FRO 05 29 O1 TO 05 31 O1 SOURCE Traffic Counts E E �-� ......................... g ......... 0 0 0 0 ............ L L E Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Y d L O- L R 000000000000000000000000o d n0000000000000000000000000 e A 5 L E L T Y L C L `c < - as E oY no- 00000000 o o n m ° -...n E- Yon - -n ^0000 -nnmo n-�no� 8 � 2 L J �$ EononRmoo_YOOOO. °:,Q 3__n R °- nr °� °mm- n0000nR:$S__n °�- e i ® ^ L L O Zg E n�o, n nnn000n_ n:�- nnnc En�Tin:��i= ._0000n°e°.nnn =�r°.o A - tn3 O E _ �^„�nnn00000-- o^�_' ° ° � n „$_ E`-= an °- '�•,n °_no- 0000 -. � °� °e`yR® i Ua� c i En mn « .nnn�n.n E..nnnn m -oo oo 0000 - - -ev .�no.om W� IL ^ w � - 8;ams ^m «_ ol CZ �. � €RRRRRRR�RR�ARR�RRRRRRRRRs a�� °..RRARRo9R.4.oRRRRRR�RmR°oRR�o mr� ou fns Om ° Om c t E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .............. o L lj �ll��d o O O OOO OOOOOOOOOOOOO OOO^ 00 O L ............ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t > E $ t L O 3 T T � L i 5 L L _ oN o. ^Na o 0 oo N.. N •+ _ y _ J L n ¢ iN C a L a m i .�_ - L - o 0 � � €RRRRRRRRRRRRRRR�RRRRRRRRs � €RRRRRRR�RRRRRRRRRRRRRR.R�' c— a m a om ° y w M W-j ixiencnai I Ma l r 51- Jl, t = STATE_ aP 53 N Veh. #1 was traveling East on Mathais Rd. approaching Pheasant Run St. at the same time as (eh. #2 was traveling North on Pheasant Run St. )river #1 stated that she saw Veh. #2 put didn't judge he speed properly and approached the uncontrolled itersection at a high rate of speed. Veh. #1 Struck /eh. #2.in the middle of the intersection. No injuries, (ehicle #2 was towed due to damage. I I I PATR gley Shakopee PD — ®st+F o oR UNT PCSTN AG SE E_ ECT RSTRN 1 �K.C-00 ( TO nCSP I TRA.`6?CRT vVsITS ES E. Q amer ❑ xrcuanca Q omen Q xnu�anc® _ Q omer Veh. #1 was traveling East on Mathais Rd. approaching Pheasant Run St. at the same time as (eh. #2 was traveling North on Pheasant Run St. )river #1 stated that she saw Veh. #2 put didn't judge he speed properly and approached the uncontrolled itersection at a high rate of speed. Veh. #1 Struck /eh. #2.in the middle of the intersection. No injuries, (ehicle #2 was towed due to damage. I I I PATR gley Shakopee PD — ®st+F o oR A ■ A TRAFFIC i Pheasant Run St. and Blue Jay Engineering Department City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (952) 445 -3650 I 1 I I rr I Pheasant Run Street South - Heading Northbound Pheasant Run Street North - Heading Southbound I I � I v I I Blue Jay St. - Heading Eastbound I 1 - I l im iiiil Intersection Photos: SHAKOPEE I 0 - IMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 1 Pheasant Run Street 1 I Engineering Department and Blue Jay St. City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street i I Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 s July 24, 2001 (952) 445 -3650 I r Does the Intersection of Pheasant Run Street and Blue Jav Street Meet the Warrant for a Two-Way op Im A stop sign is warranted if two of the following four conditions exist: (Conditions are from the Shakopee Signing Manual, October 26, 1998) 1.) If the major street trafri&amlume is more than 1000 vehicles per day and the Minor street traffic volume is less than 50% of the major street traffic volume. The major street, Pheasant Run Street, does not meet the requirement for traffic volume with an average daily count of 424. The minor street, Blue Jay Street, has an average daily count of 526 vehicles. This intersection does not meet the requirement. However, construction of new housing has not yet been completed and may result in increased traffic, which could result in the conditions being met in the near future upon completion of the subdivision. 2.) There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous years of a type correctable with stop sign installation. The intersection of Pheasant Run Street & Blue Jay Street had zero (0) reported accidents in 2000 and zero (0) reported accidents in 2001. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 3.) The pedestrian volumes across the minor approach (that which would be stopping) is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during the A.M. and P.M. peak traffic hours. The intersection of Pheasant Run Street & Blue Jay Street does not meet the requirement. 4.) If the safe stopping distance of the minor approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and/or vertical roadway alignment or by other permanent obstructions. Sight distance is not an issue at this intersection. The intersection does not meet the requirement. �• A stop sign is warranted if three of the following five conditions exist: (Conditions are from the Shakopee Signing Manual, October 26, 1998) 1.) If the major street traffic volume is more than 1500 vehicles per day and the minor street traffic volume is greater than 750 vehicles per day. The major street Pheasant Run Street, does not meet the requirement for traffic volume with an average daily count of 424. The minor street, Blue Jay Street, has an average daily count of 526 vehicles. The intersection does not meet the requirement. However, construction of new housing has not yet been completed and may result in increased traffic, which could result in the conditions being met in the near future upon completion of the subdivision. 2.) 'There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous years of a type correctable with stop sign installation. The intersection of Pheasant Run Street & Blue Jay Street had zero (0) reported accidents in 2000 and zero (0) reported accidents in 2001. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 3.) If the pedestrian volumes crossing any approach is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during the A.M. and P.M. peak traffic hours. The intersection of Pheasant Run Street & Blue Jay Street does not meet the requirement. 4.) If the safe stopping distance on the uncontrolled approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and /or vertical roadway alignment or by other permanent obstructions. Sight distance is not an issue at this intersection. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 5.) If the 85" percentile speed in the intersection is greater than 35mph and highest reported speed with two or more observations greater than 45mp. The speed at this intersection was found to have an 85` percentile speed of 28 mph. The intersection does not meet the requirement. Pheasant Pheasant Blue Jay Time Run St. Run St. St. (East) (North) (South) 14:30 24 28 30 15:30 38 29 51 16:30 24 25 37 17:30 24 19 26 18:30 29 20 24 19:30 14 18 20 20:30 10 4 7 21:30 13 11 13 22:30 5 5 4 23:30 0 0 0 0:30 2 1 2 1:30 0 0 0 2:30 0 0 0 3:30 0 0 0 4:30 14 16 14 5 :30 36 34 39 6:30 26 30 31 7:30 22 26 22 8:30 33 29 28 9:30 20 19 22 10:30 20 23 32 11:30 19 19 24 12:30 25 19 31 13:30 24 27 26 Time Pheasant Run St. (North) Pheasant Run St. (South) Blue Jay St. (East) 14:30 25 24 39 15:30 36 34 52 16:30 29 26 39 17:30 36 25 26 18:30 14 15 21 19:30 16 19 23 20:30 9 8 22 21:30 3 4 10 22:30 4 3 9 23:30 1 0 1 0:30 3 1 4 1:30 1 1 0 2:30 1 3 4 3:30 8 5 0 4:30 16 16 16 5:30 29 31 39 6:30 28 19 32 7:30 23 20 23 8:30 23 29 29 9:30 24 30 33 10:30 32 29 32 11:30 24 26 41 12:30 30 28 37 13:30 29 29 37 g u l l" , CITY OF SHAKOPEE DATE PREPARED: Daily Traffic Volume Report 07 -Z4 -01 Cn (k i Z Z) NORTH a' 33 Q W a- BlueJay t. Now 526 414 Daily Volume Entering Intersection: 1373 Total North — 31.5% South — 30.1% East — 38.3% INTERSECTION PHEASANT RUN ST. & BLUE JAY ST. IN SHAKOPEE FROM 07 18/01 TO 07/20/01 SOURCE Traffic Counts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b O b t0 O� b< d O A< •- h � �® b O m t7 A< N < O Q� Q N t7 N M I N N N N N t7 N M N Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w h M A t'f M e7 A t7 t7 h ly Pl e7 M h c7 'Inn c7 f'1 t7 h t') y T A y A 7 m t 3 c 0 V m O C t O y. C O 3 N � O � C N L u ' Y o ft m a 3 CL O Q N � � m O V CO L � g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 O L a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m s vq es�wy q L q q L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f L N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W� O mi Cn ------------------------ T N� E ?? Cf N ----------- L C N ? m ? ? N O m^ 0 0 0 o 0 M m n? M N N^ f7 m L g m N N m 0 N O^ O O O O O m n f m m n. ? m f L ----- 4 d 0 n • ri • $. m Q• � W O m f ^ N O ^ 0 0 0 � 4 A N N� N� ^� N N N N N ^ N ._ r �' oon000 oo . .Inln n c ° �_�i, n n roc-; C A Q m 4 O L E p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 o N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N L E o N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m L 6 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^ 0 0 0 0 0 4 e L E ? p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 O^ m n L n n L d n O m N L O N N L m c `O E ?mm��nninN ^000 ^o�mf�nm�� ^gym i a o 0 n • V N L n N N N N H 6o N r 7 E ? N m n m Of O N A O^ N l7 f Yf m n m O O N A r H L Z A _ p 0 m m • 1 Engineering Department City of Shakopee I29 Holmes Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (952) 445 -3650 1 1 ._-_ I 1 1 Pheasant Run Street North — Heading outhbound I g 1 i z . �� .�«, ,£ ?•,ss -. % Tr` ' i 4441jk 44 ' ,t.:,r -r tgill I iti d ? .0 - i 3 ± % T r , y I Quail Dr. — Heading Eastbound Quail Dr. — Heading Westbound I 1 _�_ __ —_ i 1 Intersection Photos: S HAKOPEE I COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 Pheasant and Run uail Dr Street 1 1 Engineering Department Q. City of Shakopee i 129 Holmes Street 1 Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 July 23, 2001 (952) 445 -3650 I • I Does the Intersection of Pheasant Run Street and Quail Drive Meet the Warrant for a Two-Way Stop Sign? A stop sign is warranted if two of the following four conditions exist: (Conditions are from the Shakopee Signing Manual, October 26, 1998) 1.) If the major street traffic volume is more than 1000 vehicles per day and the Minor street traffic volume is less than 50% of the major street traffic volume. The major street, Pheasant Run Street (south) and Quail Drive (west), does meet the requirement for traffic volume with an average daily count of 1288. The minor street, Quail Drive (east), has an average daily count of 386 vehicles. This intersection does meet the requirement. 2.) There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous years of a type correctable with stop sign installation. The intersection of Pheasant Run Street & Quail Drive had zero (0) reported accidents in 2000 and zero (0) reported accidents in 2001. The intersection does not meet the requirement. However, data gathered for 2001 reflects accidents from January through May and more accidents could occur during the remainder of 2001 resulting in the requirement being met. 3.) The pedestrian volumes across the minor approach (that which would be stopping) is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during the A.M. and P.M. peal: traffic hours. The intersection of Pheasant Run Street & Quail Drive does not meet the requirement. 4.) If the safe stopping distance of the minor approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and /or vertical roadway alignment or by other permanent obstructions. Sight distance is not an issue at this intersection. The intersection does not meet the requirement. Does the Intersection of Pheasant Run Street and Quail Drivf; Meet the i, Sign? A stop sign is warrapted if three of the following five conditions exist: (Conditions are from the Shakopee Signing Manual, October 26, 1998) 1.) If the major street traffic volume is more than 1500 vehicles per day and the minor street traffic volume is greater than 750 vehicles per day. The major street, Pheasant Run Street (south) and Quail Drive (west), does not meet the requirement for traffic volume with an average daily count of 1288. The minor street, Quail Drive (east), has an average daily count of 386 vehicles. This intersection doe not meet the requirement. 2.) There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous years of a type correctable with stop sign installation. The intersection of Pheasant Run Street & Quail Drive had zero (0) reported accidents in 2000 and zero (0) reported accidents in 2001. The intersection does not meet the requirement. However, data gathered for 2001 reflects accidents from January through May and more accidents could occur during the remainder of 2001 resulting in the requirement being met. 3.) If the pedestrian volumes crossing any approach is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during the A.M. and P.N1. peak traffic hours. The intersection of Pheasant Run Street & Quail Drive does not meet the requirement. 4.) If the safe stopping distance on the uncontrolled approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and/or vertical roadway alignment or by other permanent obstructions. Sight distance is not an issue at this intersection. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 5.) If the 85` percentile speed in the intersection is greater than 35p and highest reported speed with two or more observations greater than 45mph. The speed at this intersection was found to have an 85` percentile speed of 28 mph. The intersection does not meet the requirement. .111Iv 91 2001 July 25 2001 Pheasant Quail Dr. Quail Dr. Time Run St. (East) (West) Time (South) 11:30 89 26 77 12:30 61 23 69 13:30 63 26 69 14:30 70 29 72 15:30 54 28 64 16:30 94 27 85 17:30 89 23 93 18:30 63 19 74 19:30 53 18 62 20:30 63 24 70 21:30 26 6 28 22:30 8 3 9 23:30 4 2 6 0:30 4 0 4 1:30 5 1 4 2:30 1 0 1 3:30 1 0 1 4:30 10 2 12 5:30 41 5 41 6:30 97 18 96 7:30 102 26 92 8:30 91 22 80 9:30 62 18 43 10:30 101 24 77 July 25 2001 Pheasant Quail Dr. Quail Dr. Time Run St. (East) (West) (South) 11:30 114 30 88 12:30 68 29 64 13:30 99 19 67 14:30 77 23 81 15:30 67 26 68 16:30 97 26 97 17:30 88 28 89 18:30 103 27 109 19:30 62 11 61 20:30 43 12 52 21:30 20 12 24 22:30 8 6 15 23:30 5 0 5 0:30 4 0 3 1:30 5 0 4 2:30 3 1 1 3:30 0 2 1 4:30 14 3 16 5:30 37 9 43 6:30 104 23 91 7:30 95 28 98 8:30 79 23 76 9:30 95 34 74 10:30 84 29 70 DATE PREPARED: 07 -27 -01 I Quail Dr. � woo 1263 —� Total Doily Volume Entering Intersection: 2961 I South — 44.3% West — 42.7% East — 13.0% INTERSECTION PHEASANT RUN ST. & QUAIL DR IN SHAKOPEE FROM 07/23/01 TO 07/25/01 SOURCE Traffic Counts C h C A H O 4 3 c O U p C O q ^ A W ° o 0 N t � m � � N Q a� O m j � o b � N w p � L L L CL E E E °4 Y Y IS urrd lueseaud L t t E E m o o n 1 L p —0000000000000 0 000000000— n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L L ^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e f 0 0^ L v v v L L 0 0000 0 0 p L o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000000 v CL N O O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0^ O^ O O m L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0^ ^ 0 0 0 L L ^^ O f^ f t7 f ^ ^^ O ^ 0 0 0000-0-- 0 0 0^ 0 ^^ L tp � � CL C CL CL ^00000 ^0�nf�neeo p L �nNOOOOO ^ N�N n N ino L L L Q ^ Q Q c o N lo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0l0 o ,.;l000000000000000000000000�c `o h c 7 c N m L 4 3 c 0 y U m c O N C • N � � N � t N Y 3 � Y O N T3 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N o 0 0 0 0 0 0^ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- o L L 0000000000 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C W y 7 0 Z Y e L cL p 0 0 0 0 0 N N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c T m L o N N C m m N O O N m t O A c7 t�l t7 N m t7 f7 N^ m ? t0 N t7 O^ m V? N CS N n m L EmNmN ^ou> mm�n�o ^000�nm <�nom ^n N t O L Q ^ O p N r u � L T j n D ^ N m ^ yCVCC � m O m N � (q O N j • O nn �i ��eQi egi��i, �i �i �i �i ° n egi �i ° n �i ��i e ° n �i, �i � m O Y L E p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0< O O O O O O O O O O N O N O O m Y m L ¢ y� 0 N 0 C N O CL n n L A m N EmNrnnm Non',r ''' N m N N L N b L Q � O p r V t ---------- QI ^ Q O) W n n n N N Yj O 7 •n 0 n,��i N c ^ ^ ~ _ a � O - m O t';. 1 � I 1 X 1;1,/ • Engineering Department City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (952) 445 -3650 I , I ,.. . . .. , ._. ... . I I - I _ I . „. ... • 1 I Pheasant Run Street South - Heading Northbound Pheasant Run Street North - Heading Southbound 1 I , $ 40 I 41 1 _ I .. . ' 4 I 0 - - I I ffillialwasismaiwasaiseriiw&„ I 1 I Mathias Ave West - Heading Eastbound Mathias Ave East - Heading Westbound I I • N 1 Intersection Photos: t I SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 Pheasant Run Street and I Engineering Department 1 Ponds Way I City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street 1 I Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 July 25, 2001 (952) 445-3650 I L___ _ _ I I Does the Intersection of Pheasant Run Street and Ponds Way Meet the Warrant for a Two-Way op Sign? A stop sign is warranted if two of the following four conditions exist: (Conditions are from the Shakopee Signing Manual, October 26, 1998) 1.) If the major street trafli ume is more than 1000 vehicles per day and the Minor street traffic volume is less than 50% of the major street traffic volume. The major street, Pheasant Run Street, does meet the requirement for traffic volume with an average daily count of 1046. The minor street, Ponds Way, has an average daily count of 406 vehicles. This intersection does meet the requirement. 2.) There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous years of a type correctable with stop sign installation. The intersection of Pheasant Run Street & Ponds Way had zero (0) reported accidents in 2000 and one (1) reported accidents in 2001. The intersection does not meet the requirement. However, data gathered for 2001 reflects accidents from January through May and more accidents could occur during the remainder of 2001 resulting in the requirement being met. 3.) The pedestrian volumes across the minor approach (that which would be stopping) is more than 15 pedestrians per hounduring the A.M. and P.N1. peak traffic hours. The intersection of Pheasant Run Street & Ponds Way does not meet the requirement. 4.) If the safe stopping distance of the minor approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and/or vertical roadway alignment or by other permanent obstructions. Sight distance is not an issue at this intersection. The intersection does not meet the requirement. Does the Intersection of Pheasant Run Street and Ponds Way Meet the Warrant for a Four-Way Stop Sign? A stop sign is warranted if three of the following five conditions exist: (Conditions are from the Shakopee Suing Manual, October 26, 1998) 1.) If the major street traffic vo ume is more than 1500 vehicles per day and the minor street traffic volume is greater than 750 vehicles per day. The major street, Pheasant Run Street, does not meet the requirement for traffic volume with an average daily count of 1046. The minor street, Ponds Way, has an average daily count of 406 vehicles. This intersection does not meet the requirement. 2.) There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous years of a type correctable with stop sign installation. The intersection of Pheasant Run Street & Ponds Way had zero (0) reported accidents in 2000 and one (1) reported accidents in 2001. The intersection does not meet the requirement. However, data gathered for 2001 reflects accidents from January through May and more accidents could occur during the remainder of 2001 resulting in the requirement being met. 3.) If the pedestrian volumes crossing any approach is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during the A.M. and P.TNI. peak traffic hours. The intersection of Pheasant Run Street & Ponds Way does not meet the requirement. 4.) If the safe stopping distance on the uncontrolled approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and /or vertical roadway alignment or by other permanent obstructions. Sight distance is not an issue at this intersection. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 5.) If the 85` percentile speed in the intersection is greater than 35mph and highest reported speed with two or more observations greater than 45mph. The speed at this intersection was found to have an 85` percentile speed of 28 mph. The intersection does not meet the requirement. RE CITY OF SHAKOPEE DATE PREPARED: Daily Traffic Volume Report 07 -30 -01 Total Daily Volume Entering Intersection: 2905 North — 45.9% South — 26.1 East — 21.8% West — 6.2% INTERSECTION PHEASANT RUN ST. & PONDS WAY IN SHAKOPEE FROM 07/25/01 TO 07/27/01 SOURCE Traffic Counts ke Jul 25, 2001 City of Shakopee Volume Data - Pheasant Run SL and Ponds Way July 25, 2001 A July 27, 2001 ime Pheasant Run St. (North) Pheasant Run St. (South) Ponds Way Ponds Way (East) (West) 14 :00 60 30 27 4 15:00 67 44 21 12 16:00 106 63 45 8 17:00 115 62 45 13 18:00 91 46 44 5 19:00 79 49 39 8 20:00 76 47 37 8 21:00 49 28 23 5 22:00 29 10 17 4 23:00 9 5 4 0 0:00 6 4 2 0 1:00 4 3 1 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 3:00 1 0 1 0 4:00 2 0 2 0 5:00 27 14 14 4 6:00 64 41 16 5 7:00 110 50 61 17 8:00 56 41 25 9 9:00 47 23 36 13 10:00 63 50 25 15 11:00 66 42 25 17 12:00 69 36 36 6 13:00 77 48 33 25 gamma" 1 1 Pheasant Pheasant Ponds Way Ponds Way Time Run St. Run St. (East) (West} (North) (South) 14:00 68 41 31 9 15:00 107 70 56 18 16:00 114 62 47 13 17:00 118 48 74 4 18:00 118 64 48 11 19:00 79 45 31 6 20:00 69 47 42 13 21:00 50 34 22 5 22:00 35 10 22 0 23 :00 11 6 5 0 0:00 10 6 3 3 1:00 8 5 3 0 2:00 1 1 0 0 3:00 2 1 0 1 4:00 5 3 2 0 5:00 26 17 9 5 6:00 58 34 25 4 7:00 87 39 46 7 8:00 64 31 32 9 9:00 82 44 39 18 10:00 60 30 34 28 11:00 73 49 41 15 12:00 80 39 46 10 13:00 70 53 29 2 L 4 1S �/4f WeuG L rz Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 m m L N N L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m f L f L 4 m L y � N. N N. ^ O N O ^ 0 0 0 ^• O O t'f �O N N O- 0 0 n w � a r tl J C p© �O � m �O Y Y �tJ �l1 CJ - 0 0 0 0 t7 N�� n N N n•n m L d O n f n m L N- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^^ g O V 10 A N N f f7 l7 N 10 N t7 N N (�I f7 N � h N r 3 nnn n n�i�� r ^ ^ - ^ ^ ^ N N N N ^ �• '.• r- C � m O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m L CL E o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 m N L E o N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N L E o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Y L d E O N O O O O O O ^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T L E N p 0 0 0 0 ^ O O O O ^ 0 0 0 0 ^ 0 0 0 0^ 0 0 m L O E ----------- O O O O O Y N N^ O N CL N n L f E ^ n H t L N E N m L m S� E ^<o ^Y ^ou�000000000- o� ^N ^N -N � N o a 8 0 � f7 Y t'f N N N f t7 t7 C7 Y N� N S C 4 N r N C A O Q m t i C p C n n N h N G7 n A O H O i ®G Cts' of S lZ< NJCAp 1p r0! Tmpdgoa - ®® 3 i 1' 1 1 1 Y .f m Barrington Drive - Heading Eastbound by Counters Barrington Drive - Heading Westbound by Counters 1 1 1 c : , :;, mss• � °:Itor .-,* t'- a_1.>:sil:'Y' r - i I I Barrington Drive North of CR 78 - Heading Northbound Barrington Drive East of CR 79 - Heading Eastbound 1 1 Intersection Photos: 3 SHAKOPEE E 1 COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 i I Barrington Drive I Engineering Department City of Shakopee S 129 Holmes Street 1 Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 May 29, 2001 (952) 445 -3650 1 E 1 SHEET NO. i 1 Ell :1 1;, 1. BARRINGT ❑N DRIVE TRAF STUDY YSB J1111111 L d - ssociares.Inc- To: Bruce LoniT, P.E. Public J orks Director Ch v of Shakopee From: Charles T. Rickart, P.E. Transportation Engineer Date: August 13, 2001 Re: Barrington Drive Traffic Study Review fVSB Project No. 1281 -20 As you requested, I have reviewed the traffic study completed by your staff for Barrington Drive between County Road (CR) 79 and CR 78. Based on my review I offer the following comments: 1. The traffic volume counts reflect closely the traffic that would be expected on this roadway. There are approximately 3' 3 homes located on this roadway. Assuming 9 to 10 trips per day per home. This can be translated into approximately 300 trips per day. If we assume that 50% of the traffic (150 vehicles) travel to CR 79 and 50% (150 vehicles) to CR 78, this is very close to the 138 vehicles counted. 2. Traffic counts that were completed will not significantly change over time. There appears to be no additional land for development of new lots. 3. The speed limit of Barrington Drive was measured at the 85` percentile of' 3 MPH. Based on that data, the speed limit could be set at 35 MPH or 30 MPH. Based on the above comments, I would make the following recommendations: 1. Post the speed limit along the roadway at 30 MPH. With the curves in the road and the measured speed limit, this would be reasonable. Signs would need to be installed. 4 0 Olson Memorial Highway rim S - e 300 Minneapolis R ,nesota - '__ 122 763 - 541 -4800 i 1.541.1700 FAX If you have any questions or need additional information on this review, please contact me at (763) 287 -7183. F: \wpwin \1281 -20 \081301 bl2.doc __ Minneapolis St. Cloud Equal Opportunity Employer CITY OF SHAKOPEE D aily Traffic Volu Re DATE PREPARED: O -2o -01 Barrington Dr ive M �* Total Daily Volume Entering Intersection: 132 West — 48.5% East — 51.5% INTERSECTION Barrington Drive IN SHAKOPEE FROM 06/18/01 TO 06/20/01 SOURCE Traffic Counts Does Barrington Meet I' • Warrant for h Stop Sign? A stop sign is warranted if two of the following four conditions exist: (Conditions are from the Shakopee Signing Manual, October 26, 1998) 1.) If the major street traffic volume is more than 1000 vehicles per day and the Minor street traffic volume is less than 50% of the major street traffic volume. The major street, Barrington Drive, does not meet the requirement for traffic volume with an average daily count of 132. There is no minor street as Barrington Drive is the only street along this run. Barrington Drive does not meet the requirement. 2.) There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous years of a type correctable with stop sign installation. Barrington Drive had zero (0) reported accidents in 2000 and zero (0) reported accidents in 2001. Barrington Drive does not meet the requirement. 3.) The pedestrian volumes across the minor approach (that which would be stopping) is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during the A.M. and P.M. peak traffic hours. Barrington Drive does not meet the requirement. 4.) If the safe stopping distance of the minor approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and/or vertical roadway alignment or by other permanent obstructions. Sight distance is not an issue. Barrington Drive does not meet the requirement. CO S14AKOPEE =E SRqCF- 11 City of • •.• Volume ♦ _ D rive June 18, 2001 to June20, 2001 UMMU Barrington Dr. Barrington Dr. Time (East to West) (West to East) 10:00 4 3 11:00 3 3 12:00 4 5 13:00 3 6 14:00 4 7 15:00 4 4 16:00 12 6 17:00 7 6 18:00 2 3 19:00 3 2 20:00 3 7 21:00 5 1 22:00 1 1 23:00 0 1 0:00 0 1 1:00 0 0 2 :00 1 0 3:00 0 1 4:00 1 0 5:00 3 4 6:00 0 3 7:00 3 3 8:00 0 3 9:00 3 2 UMMU Barrington Dr. Barrington Dr. Time (East to West) (West to East) 10:00 2 2 11:00 3 2 12:00 1 5 13:00 3 5 14:00 6 2 15:00 4 7 16:00 6 6 17:00 6 3 18:00 7 7 19:00 5 1 20:00 3 4 21:00 3 1 22:00 1 2 23:00 0 0 0:00 0 0 1:00 0 0 2:00 0 0 3:00 1 1 4:00 2 1 5:00 2 7 6:00 4 3 7:00 1 3 8:00 2 1 9:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O r O O r r 0 c7 r O r r 0 0 0 0 0 r r r O r o �I O O O N co m m n r N r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O r r 0 0 l r O O r 0 0 0 N N O r r O 0 0 0 0 r O r O O r 0 0 0 0 o r o o r r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N M r M tD � t0 CO r m C] t7 r 0 0 0 0 r N N Q r N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CL c E E m a L E E m m � � cc CL E s E ,�0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 v v m L p m m v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S L C v v e L CL L E 4 S L E S E m � M � L a m 0 r N O r r r r .- N r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r O N O N N N S L C L a � m N S C C ° C L a N I t n y j�ti.G�vt „�.,�,„� i�^:; r':an,i L a p M 000000r0000000000000000o r S C � C L CL E S E O O O O O O O O r O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r o _ 1a} m °< r4 big. N Ir ao cc l y � z �y° m 'E0000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ? t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O r O O r r 0 c7 r O r r 0 0 0 0 0 r r r O r o �I O O O N co m m n r N r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O r r 0 0 l r O O r 0 0 0 N N O r r O 0 0 0 0 r O r O O r 0 0 0 0 o r o o r r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N M r M tD � t0 CO r m C] t7 r 0 0 0 0 r N N Q r N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y m W O � o `\ O O N O Q N Y � O m � � N � m U � 7 W U V L E N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c a m t L D c E o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c c ° Q m m L E N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C N Mf L E p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G N m Q L E 4 L E 4 m M L a M a O N E N N E N L a Q O o O r m • U L N c CL Q r � m = o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c 7 E O^ N f7 <� •D 1� m 01 O W N <7 C A N f7 <� fD 1� m Q r C � G D m o N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m L E o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m N L E O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N L E O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N m Q L E 4 v L E c7 p O N 0 0 � � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0^ O •D 4 m n L a O n Of m N L a N N a N m L n -- Q O o C c L N q O O N � m = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W f • F O' N <7 < N f0 i� m O N N N N G � N a7 <� (C i� © O U T � T p m O IN OM , Engineering Department City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (952) 445 -3650 I ,, . R r t a I .. , ,�,.. Tasha Blvd North - Heading Southbound Tasha Blvd South - Heading Northbound g g `pi's y ., 4'''-'7; t a' x r LE FT 1 ITURN ...,..r. i '.4. Trip it ., _ _ I 1 1 Vierling Drive East - Heading Westbound Vierling Drive West - Heading Eastbound I I I Intersection Photos: SHAKOPEE I COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 . Vierling Drive and I Engineering Department Tasha Blvd. City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street I Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 July 27, 2001 (952) 445 -3650 I I r ,.:—,- .�..M.�.. ._.. J • : .. I I Heather Street North - Heading Southbound Heather Street South - Heading Northbound ._._. -_ 3 u . f if I Vierling Drive East - Heading Westbound Vierling Drive West - Heading Eastbound I --__ -._ I Intersection Photos: I SFTAKOPEE COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 Vierling Drive and 1 Engineering Department Heather Street City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street I Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 July 27, 2001 (952) 445 -3650 1 I StE£EY hEtJ. pomw SHAIMPEE omanmvmmsmmw 1 VIERLING DRIVE AND CROSSROADS ACCESSES City of Shakopee I li Volume Data - Vierling Drive and Crossroads Accesses July 11, 2001 to July 12, 2001 SFLAKOPEE CCNQAUNMa PRIDE SIT-= 1857 ily 11, 2001 Intersection: Tasha Boulevard and Veirling Drive Entering Entering Entering Entering Entering Entering Entering Entering Entering Entering Entering Entering from North from North from North from East from East from East from South from South from South from West from West from West Time Heading Heading Heading Heading Heading Heading Heading Heading Heading Heading Heading Heading West South East North West . South East North West South East North 8:00 0 1 0 2 35 39 37 0 4 14 61 0 8:15 0 1 2 4 27 38 44 0 4 15 56 2 8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 :45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:00 1 1 3 5 31 45 36 1 6 13 43 1 9 :15 0 2 6 1 28 49 39 0 9 10 56 1 9:30 3 5 2 7 43 48 38 1 8 12 28 0 9 :45 0 2 3 8 34 44 44 3 4 7 40 0 10:00 1 2 4 4 28 46 37 1 7 14 44 0 10:15 1 3 1 5 37 81 47 0 12 15 57 1 10:30 2 2 7 4 43 55 66 2 7 17 37 1 10:45 2 2 5 9 36 60 44 1 7 9 30 3 11:00 5 2 11 7 43 64 60 0 6 9 64 0 11:15 4 0 2 7 53 84 58 0 15 13 52 0 11:30 8 1 14 14 71 87 78 3 16 12 74 0 11:45 4 3 4 16 82 87 72 1 10 14 79 1 12 :00 4 2 16 18 81 87 70 0 9 12 94 2 12:15 7 2 21 20 57 71 82 2 8 19 81 1 12:30 7 2 17 17 68 85 75 2 8 6 94 2 12:45 7 0 19 15 67 62 73 0 10 10 57 0 13:00 7 3 17 10 53 59 65 1 2 9 58 2 13:15 5 2 13 11 58 76 63 2 2 9 72 2 13:30 4 3 9 12 32 71 59 0 7 17 44 1 13:45 2 0 14 13 56 67 56 2 4 14 67 2 14:00 4 2 16 10 46 86 68 1 12 9 57 2 14:15 2 1 11 7 80 72 50 2 10 8 67 0 14:30 7 1 10 6 72 93 72 0 5 10 65 1 14:45 5 2 21 18 67 68 58 2 7 8 84 0 15:00 4 2 15 12 76 78 58 5 19 14 53 2 15:15 3 0 12 9 73 71 67 1 9 9 54 0 15 :30 3 0 15 19 76 65 68 0 8 9 51 1 15:45 4 2 12 16 77 81 71 0 9 22 56 0 16:00 5 0 11 8 83 106 78 2 18 24 63 5 16:15 11 3 9 14 85 100 90 1 18 21 75 2 16:30 4 1 13 10 97 107 92 0 10 14 95 4 16 :45 8 1 14 11 111 93 88 1 11 19 73 3 17 :00 6 1 14 9 105 106 76 1 4 11 76 1 17 :15 6 1 8 11 95 100 98 1 12 16 81 6 17:30 4 1 9 16 106 121 99 2 13 15 76 2 17:45 4 1 6 19 114 89 91 1 12 14 76 1 18 :00 4 0 11 12 116 105 93 1 14 16 76 2 18:15 4 1 2 20 113 105 89 2 13 17 68 4 18:30 5 1 6 9 95 8 8 86 4 16 14 63 6 Daily Vehicle Count City of Shakopee Volume Data - Vierling Drive and Crossroads Accesses Juty 11, 2001 to Juty 12, 2001 SIJA-KOPEE CC)1v 2L.JNr1Y PRIDE SnvCM 1857 ily 12, 2001 Intersection: Heather Street and Vierling Drive Entering Entering Entering Entering Entering Entering Entering Entering Entering Entering Entering Entering from North from North from North from East from East from East from South from South from South from West from West from West Time Heading Heading Heading Heading Heading Heading Heading Heading Heading Heading Heading Heading West South East North West South East North West South East North 8:00 0 1 1 1 21 11 4 0 5 9 79 0 8:15 0 0 0 0 23 4 6 0 8 7 67 0 8:30 0 3 1 1 31 5 5 0 3 7 61 3 8:45 1 0 2 1 22 11 2 0 9 8 66 4 9:00 1 3 0 3 29 11 5 0 5 6 45 3 9:15 3 2 1 2 21 8 0 0 1 5 37 1 9:30 0 0 1 1 34 10 7 0 8 3 45 1 9:45 2 1 2 1 35 9 6 0 4 6 32 1 10:00 3 1 2 1 27 7 10 1 7 6 27 2 10:15 1 3 1 1 39 7 3 0 11 6 41 1 10:30 3 2 3 1 36 21 14 0 6 12 44 -2 10:45 1 2 0 0 30 24 13 2 17 14 32 2 11:00 4 3 0 1 37 34 20 2 24 19 38 3 11:15 3 1 2 1 43 28 29 5 21 10 46 6 11:30 4 1 9 1 48 59 38 3 15 19 45 6 11:45 7 2 7 4 44 48 41 3 33 22 50 7 12:00 7 7 6 1 41 48 37 1 21 22 53 0 I 12:15 5 2 5 2 38 44 53 6 21 9 49 3 12:30 7 6 6 1 53 37 32 3 16 4 30 2 12:45 6 3 4 6 36 26 35 4 21 11 51 9 - 13:00 8 1 4 4 42 37 32 2 21 13 40 6 13:15 9 0 8 2 45 22 40 4 15 15 41 0 13:30 4 2 3 3 37 24 27 2 19 20 41 0 13:45 6 2 5 1 35 28 22 3 22 16 37 6 14:00 11 0 10 5 45 22 22 2 12 8 23 0 14:15 2 2 5 2 44 29 27 1 23 12 27 2 14:30 4 1 4 2 36 38 21 1 19 15 53 2 14:45 5 3 4 3 41 33 23 4 25 8 28 1 15:00 3 0 3 1 57 32 15 0 15 7 20 2 15:15 0 3 4 4 62 30 36 2 15 15 39 3 15:30 4 1 5 3 52 32 30 1 26 16 32 1 15:45 2 1 8 4 62 32 36 2 24 13 39 3 16:00 2 4 5 1 44 27 35 3 39 19 51 5 16:15 13 2 4 3 64 25 34 6 25 20 29 9 16:30 6 1 8 3 65 37 18 1 30 25 55 4 16:45 9 0 3 2 88 44 34 4 39 21 63 3 17:00 8 0 6 3 70 47 39 2 35 25 53 1 17:15 10 4 5 1 59 43 49 13 37 18 67 6 17:30 6 2 13 7 91 37 20 2 25 16 38 3 17:45 6 1 11 8 72 55 13 2 32 14 27 3 18:00 4 0 2 4 83 45 27 4 51 16 61 7 18:15 11 3 9 3 72 46 38 1 54 19 58 4 18:30 7 1 11 4 78 53 51 11 19 21 63 6 Daily Vehicle 03 Count CITY OF SHAKOPEE DATE PREPARED: Daily Traffic Volume Report 08/17/01 VILKLIINU UMI VC Total Volume Entering Intersection: 13338 Entering from: North Heading: East — 3.0% Entering from: South Heading: West — 2.9% North South — 0.5% South North — 0.4% North West — 1.3% South East — 20.5% East South — 23.5% West North — 0.5% East West — 20.6% West East — 19.5% East North — 3.3% West South — 4.0% INTERSECTION TASHA BLVD. AND VIERLING DRIVE IN SHAKOPEE -- Date: 07/11/01 SOURCE Traffic Counts VILKLIINU UMI VC CITY OF SHAKOPEE 'HA KOPEE Daily Traffic Report DATE PREPARED: 08/17/01 VIERLING DRIVE I Total Volume Entering Intersection: 8536 Entering from: North Heading: East — 2.3% Entering from: South Heading: West — 10.3% North South — 0.9% South North — 1.2% North West — 2.3% South East — 12.2% East South — 14.9% West North — 1.6% East West — 23.8% West East — 22.5% East North — 1.2% West South — 6.8% INTERSECTION HEATHER ST. AND VIERLING DRIVE IN SHAKOPEE Date' 07/12/01 - SOURCE Traffic Counts ►t 3 033 7 a� saw 2t teJ c ®. - r f a 7 OQtM 7 � 3) ANDI SVTE AMBLXANC£ RUN K &43MS) \ r 14 on I n US ru ME iI it =Immffwq■ ■.� FKXfM *. RDz PORT CA FEAZURE lj==7 - , 2 zr L IV ? c a" ? ❑ OTI AMBULANCE SERVICE(S) A.'Q;OR SUUT-. AMtRA.A— OESCRPTICK C)AAFr.Es P--NDW- NO OR Cr W)ONS &9---D IlVell- VZI�7— ( -4-0 �, go ME ® _ Fobft—T&WZ: : m it OWN o oast µ sEnvrc£tst �r+oioa sure n.esuureca Rur+raa�Ewsl pESCSt;PrXkl CMARCaes ver+araG. APLJ OR GTATIONS l5°,UED - OFFICE AT lYYW ®AOGE e. Ar 0 AGENCY �`_ - MEN OEM CAS co" C•wd C,oli 7 Omh AMBLA.ANCE SERVK:E(S) AND/OR STATE AMBULANCE RUN MA*3£R(S) f OESCRPTYk'l C14AC£S 7E1OMa, A1e0 Ofi GA7K? 6 ' 0 _ j � � 1 i *SCRPTCXI CPARGES PENDING. AND OR O W *NS *SUED k I-n 7 aaq i c. 7 Cal 7 ❑ rna a.+e 7 aa� AID /OR SLQE RUN r I.&eER Sl *SCRPTCXI CPARGES PENDING. AND OR O W *NS *SUED k I-n 0 2000 -6637 THIS IS A TAPED PHONE CONVERSATION THAT TOOK PLACE ON 7/17/00. SPEAKING ARE OFFICER ANGELA TRUTNAU AND ANTHONY ANDRE CALIGURI. Transcribed by Donna Hyatt AT: Officer Trutnau AC: Anthony Caliguri AT: All right. This is a taped statement for ICR 2000- 6637. I'm Officer Angela Trutnau. It is July 17` at 1103 AM. I'm speaking with Anthony Caliguri and Anthony, could I get you to spell your last name for me? AC: C- a- 1- i- g -u -r -i AT: And Anthony was intersection of Saturday, July Caliguri, it is switch involved involved in an accident at the Vierling Drive and Tasha Boulevard on L5 at 1444 in the afternoon. Mr. your belief that there was a driver with the other vehicle? AC: Yes, there was. AT: What did you see? AC: Through the rear -view mirror, I looked up and I saw one on top of the other and then I saw legs and arms and I saw that the driver had, had ah, switched over and jumped into the passenger side and the passenger squeezed in under him and got into the driver's ah, ah, section. AT: All right. Did you see which individual was.driving at the time of the impact? AC: Yes, because I - just as soon as it happened, I looked and saw what - they looked so much alike to me at the time and ah, I didn't know and then I saw there for a moment and I looked up again and all of a sudden I saw arms and legs and one trying to get over to one side and one trying to get into the other side. AT: Okay, so you couldn't tell me which one for sure was driving at the time? AC: I don't think so, no. AT: Okay. And then - 1) AC: All I saw was the switch. AT: And at the scene of the accident, you told me that you believed they had switched drivers, correct? AC: Yes. AT: Okay and I, at that time, told you that one of the individuals did not have a driver's license. AC: Right. AT: Right. One of the drivers, one of the individuals by the name of Andrew stated that he was the driver and the passenger of the vehicle, by the name of Luke Struck, stated that he was the passenger. Luke, at this time, has only a permit. AC: Oh AT: Okay? AC: Right. AT: So you're concerned about your insurance rates going up at this time? AC: Yes, yes. AT: Have you been involved in an accident prior to this? AC: I've been driving 67 years, Honey, and I've had three rear -ends. AT: Three rear -ends? AC: The last one, 10, 12 years ago. AT: Okay. Okay and you were on your way to Canterbury Park at the time? AC: Yes AT: You were turning right from the AC: Yes, the ah, I had just got back from the gas station. AT: Okay, the SuperAmerica right there? AC: Right AT; And you were turning right to head east on Vierling, correct? AC: Right. AT: And you pulled out into which lane? AC: I pulled out and got into the center la AT: Okay. So you didn't establish the rigs first before you changed to the center AC: No. AT: And which lane were you in at the time then? AC: I was right in the center lane. Right center lane. There was a car ahead of slow down. AT: Okay. And ah, did you see the truck cc you? AC: No, I heard screeching of brakes - and tt but it was some time before I got hit. AT: Okay, did you - so you did not see the heard it? AC: No. AT; Okay, all right. What I'm going to do conclude this statement unless you have to add. AC: No, this will be fine. AT: I'm going to conclude the statement. I AM. IF `§� I IF I _Y - I I t I Valley Park Drive - Heading Northbound 1 I i a , e- � K • I 4.i., _ �- i .. nz i , I) - ,„ _ - -', ', _ N „ A -/' ` ''r 1 I 12th Avenue - Heading Eastbound 12th Avenue - Heading Westbound I i 1 I I Intersection Photos: 4 1 1 i S HAKOPEE g CUIVLMUNTl Y PRIDE SINCE 1857 , Valley Drive Park & 12th I Engineering Department Avenue City of Shakopee E 1 129 Holmes Street I Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 ! August 3, 2001 (952) 445 -3650 I .] I Does the Intersection of Valley Drive Park and 12' Avenue Meet the Warrant for a Two-Way Stop Sign? A stop sign is warranted if two of the following four conditions exist: (Conditions are from the Shakopee Signing Manual, October 26, 1998) 1.) If the major street traffic volume is more than 1000 vehicles per day and the Minor street traffic volume is less than 50% of the major street traffic volume. The major street, Valley Park Drive and 12 Avenue West, does meet the requirement for traffic volume with an average daily count of 2153. The minor street, 12 Avenue East, has an average daily count of 861 vehicles. This intersection does meet the requirement. 2.) There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous years of a type correctable with stop sign installation. The intersection of Valley Drive Park & 12 Avenue had one (1) reported accidents in 2000 and zero (0) reported accidents in 2001. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 3.) The pedestrian volumes across the minor approach (that which would be stopping) is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during the A.M. and P.M. peak traffic hours. The intersection of Valley Drive Park & 12 Avenue does not meet the requirement. 4.) If the safe stopping distance of the minor approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and/or vertical roadway alignment or by other permanent obstructions. Sight distance is not an issue at this intersection. The intersection does not meet the requirement. R'Poes the Intersection of Valley Drive Park ♦ 12 1h Avenu'O Meet the Warrant for a Four-Way Stop Sign? A stop sign is warranted if three of the following five conditions exist: (Conditions are from the Shakopee Signing Manual, October 26, 1998) 1.) If the major street traffic volume is more than 1500 vehicles per day and the 'nor street traffic volume is greater than 750 vehicles per day. The major street, Valley Park Drive and 12 Avenue West, does meet the requirement for traffic volume with an average daily count of 2153. The minor street, 12 Avenue East, has an average daily count of 861 vehicles. This intersection does meet the requirement. 2.) 'There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous years of a type correctable with stop sign installation. The intersection of Valley Park Dive & 12 Avenue had one (1) reported accidents in 2000 and (0) reported accidents in 2001. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 3.) If the pedestrian volumes crossing any approach is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during the A.M. and P.M. peak traffic hours. The intersection of Valley Drive Park & 12 Avenue does not meet the requirement. 4.) If the safe stopping distance on the uncontrolled approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and /or vertical roadway alignment or by other permanent obstructions. Sight distance is not an issue at this intersection. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 5.) If the 85 percentile speed in the intersection is greater than 35mph and highest reported speed with two or more observations greater than 45mph. The speed test at this intersection was not conducted, as speed is not an issue here. The intersection does not meet the requirement. • 1! • 1l Valley View 12th Ave. 12th Ave. Time park (East) (West) 11:30 137 52 193 12:30 161 32 206 13:30 150 35 134 14:30 54 8 59 15 :30 40 22 63 16:30 26 2 24 17:30 24 12 28 18:30 27 6 23 19:30 27 9 29 20:30 10 9 11 21:30 11 0 11 22:30 4 2 6 23 :30 5 3 4 0:30 8 3 8 1:30 34 73 113 2 :30 107 92 162 3:30 167 54 184 4:30 130 60 129 5:30 103 66 119 6 :30 85 49 122 7:30 147 102 209 8:30 224 102 275 9:30 140 34 132 10:30 141 103 214 • 1l Valley View 12th Ave. 12th Ave. Time park (East) (West) 11:30 155 55 175 12:30 150 40 201 13:30 110 21 99 14:30 62 11 66 15:30 55 14 65 16:30 24 2 17 17:30 18 5 21 18:30 18 1 27 19:30 29 7 36 20:30 14 5 14 21:30 8 6 12 22:30 10 2 14 23:30 15 1 17 0:30 7 2 12 1:30 40 75 118 2:30 121 95 158 3:30 128 52 179 4:30 119 23 92 5:30 74 55 99 6:30 87 53 124 7:30 156 78 218 8 :30 183 68 235 9:30 156 55 140 10:30 139 66 173 DATE PREPARED: 08 -06 -01 12TH, AVE. 0 Y Q D_ W J� J i Total Daily Volume Entering Intersection: 5166 North- - 37.2% West — 46.2% East — 16.6% sm I INTERSECTION _ VALLEY PARK DR. & 12TH AVE IN SHAKOPEE _FROM 08 01 01 TO 08 03 01 SOURCE Traffic Counts C3 ODD a a orw Do" amw /1/ - T. r - I X . -. *-; e 2 — - ul i Engineering Department City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (952) 445 -3650 200 0 200 SCALE: 1 " = 200' SHEET No. ADAMS STREET S]HIMOPEIE a W7 TRAFFIC STUDY Engineering Department City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (952) 445 -3650 . I ., _ $ �5, , ...... ._ .._,� .... . m . _. . . , °,0.► 1 , _ 7,- .-, is -� Adams Street South - Heading Northbound Adams Street North - Heading Southbound I • _ ; t i v I I 6th Ave West - Heading Eastbound 6th Ave East - Heading Westbound I ill - 1111 11111°1111 Intersection Photos: SHAKOPEE I COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 Adams Street and 6th Ave. I Engineering Department City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street I I Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 August 20, 2001 I (952) 445 -3650 I 100 0 100 SCALE: 1 " =100' SHEET NO. ADAMS STREET AND 6TH AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY Does the 1 1 1 of Adams Street and 6th Avenue Meet the 1 for 1" Stop Sign? A stop sign is warranted if two of the following four conditions exist: (Conditions are from the Shakopee Signing Manual, October 26, 1998) 1.) If the major street traffic volume is more than 1000 vehicles per day and the Minor street traffic volume is less than 50% of the major street traffic volume. The major street, 6th Avenue, does not meet the requirement for traffic volume with an average daily count of 2377. The minor street, Adams Street, has an average daily count of 1401 vehicles. This intersection does not meet the requirement. 2.) 'There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous years of a type correctable with stop sign installation. The intersection of Adams Street & 6th Avenue had zero (0) reported accidents in 2000 and one (1) reported accidents in 2001. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 3.) The pedestrian volumes across the minor approach (that which would be stopping) is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during the A. M. and P.M. peak traffic hours. The intersection of Adams Street & 6 th Avenue does not meet the requirement. 4.) If the safe stopping distance of the minor approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and/or vertical roadway alignment or by other permanent obstructions. Sight distance is not an issue at this intersection. The intersection does not meet the requirement. Does the 1 ! .1 of Adams 1 1 1 6th Avenue Meet the I for 1 11 Sign? A stop sign is warranted if three of the following five conditions exist: (Conditions are from the Shakopee Signing Manual, October 26, 1998) 1.) If the major street traffic volume is more than 1500 vehicles per day and the minor street traffic volume is greater than 750 vehicles per day. The major street, 6 th Avenue, does meet the requirement for traffic volume with an average daily count of 2377. The minor street, Adams Street, has an average daily count of 1401 vehicles. This intersection does meet the requirement. 2.) There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous years of a type correctable with stop sign installation. The intersection of Adams Street & 6 th Avenue had zero (0) reported accidents in 2000 and one (1) reported accidents in 2001. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 3.) If the pedestrian volumes crossing any approach is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during the A.M. and P.M. peak traffic hours. The intersection of Adams Street & 6 th Avenue does not meet the requirement. 4.) If the safe stopping distance on the uncontrolled approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and /or vertical roadway alignment or by other permanent obstructions. Sight distance is not an issue at this intersection. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 5.) If the 85 percentile speed in the intersection is greater than 35mph and highest reported speed with two or more observations greater than 45ph. The speed at this intersection was found to have an 85 percentile speed of 37 mph. The intersection does meet the requirement. August 8, 2001 Adams Adams 6th Avenue 6th Avenue Time Street Street (East) (West) 6th Avenue (North) (South) Street 12:00 53 122 178. 112 13:00 51 110 165 111 14:00 53 153 200 104 15:00 39 151 213 128 16:00 47 173 250 167 17:00 38 165 237 142 18:00 32 115 165 100 19:00 24 112 129 81 20:00 22 86 109 70 21:00 19 64 102 60 22:00 12 53 70 38 23:00 10 28 29 17 0:00 1 10 17 7 1:00 4 12 14 9 2:00 1 4 5 3 3:00 6 7 7 7 4:00 8 11 14 10 5:00 26 58 72 40 6:00 42 138 184 106 7:00 34 155 208 110 8:00 26 104 151 84 9:00 27 93 145 81 10:00 37 90 127 88 11:00 43 112 150 85 August 8, 2001 Adams Adams 6th Avenue 6th Avenue Time Street Street (East) (West) (North) (South) 12:00 58 143 173 118 13:00 34 83 157 112 14:00 39 121 188 114 15:00 51 160 222 125 16:00 33 172 254 166 17:00 45 175 231 141 18:00 28 111 164 112 19:00 28 107 160 101 20:00 24 78 108 80 21:00 27 71 83 48 22:00 21 83 90 33 23:00 9 36 55 31 0:00 11 21 24 15 1:00 6 7 12 6 2:00 1 3 5 3 3:00 6 9 4 4 4:00 14 17 19 14 5:00 25 60 63 35 6:00 31 134 179 87 7:00 38 174 230 118 8:00 37 108 155 88 9:00 31 93 145 92 10:00 47 92 140 94 11:00 41 78 123 84 CITY OF SHAKOPEE DATE PREPA I I AKO I'' ICI �;., - 08-09-0 6TH AVE. - N am 791 2962 1 Total Daily Volume Entering Intersection: 7554 South — 28.2% North — 8.9% West — 23.7% East — 39.2% INTERSECTION ADAMS STREET & 6TH AVENUE IN SHAKOPEE FROM 08 06 01 TO 08 08 O1 SOURCE Traffic Counts tYat1$ A+++P! m Q t O a � c ° � N � m d N N 3 Q a = Q O t � O n Q m a t^ 3 d Q � Q W� Wu O r Z u L m O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O. O O O O ------------------------ I� C . ^ e O N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m a Y ^ v L d 4 L a E m r m O m N m e c7 m n N m N m m^ TI 9N m � to to m n n e M n 7 m m N- O N O N e e e e m N M n N f m 0 [7 N N M L a n N uJ e N e n m 0 0 0 0 n m e OI f7 m m N N L d N tD a E ------ N O O - O O O O O O --- O O e O O o [V m U m N O m O n h m m N O m r v e N e m N n 0 Cld N N N N ^ ^ ^ 0 N H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q E - iii v - - n - - O Q m tD h L N s a N n ,E _ Y v L d m m O> a n 0 ^ m m 0 m O e CJ N M O e e N r r N^ m N C c7 N M N Y L d E mmm� ^ ^ mrem�N Nrn�tn come n L a a7 N L n N N t 6 - N t0 L � a O 7 O o 04 � 0 r U y O � r p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a QE o 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 D • H N f7 a to <p n m Qf T � m ] Q m I o� o� A SWE AWSULMCE F&N S) —. i ®...o 1 9 A.- 1 Engineering Department City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (952) 445 -3650 1 1 4 H ) r • t I Adams Street South - Heading Northbound Adams Street North - Heading Southbound 1 3 k m 7 r �a - k — e I _ _. 1 1 - , -.....ks„,. i 1 4th Ave West - Heading Eastbound 1 1 E r____ E E 1 ;1; Intersection Photos: t 5 f SHAKOPEE 1 CC/ 1M NITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 i Adams Street and 4t" Ave. I Engineering Department City f Shakopee ee P 129 Holmes Street 1 Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 August 20, 2001 E (952) 445 -3650 i 1 g 1 100 0 100 SCALE: 1 " =100' SHEET N0. ADAMS STREET AND SHAKOME 4TH AVENUE 1 �q?=lW TRAFFIC STUDY IF 1 i I W 1 ' '1 Meet the 1 for T Stop Sign? A stop sign is warranted if two of the following four conditions exist: (Conditions are from the Shakopee Signing Manual, October 26, 1998) 1.) If the major street traffic volume is more than 1000 vehicles per day and the Minor street traffic volume is less than 50% of the major street traffic volume. The major street, Adams Street, does not meet the requirement for traffic volume with an average daily count of 617. The minor street, 4th Street, has an average daily count of 125 vehicles. This intersection does not meet the requirement. 2.) 'There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous years of a type correctable with stop sign installation. The intersection of Adams Street & 4 th Avenue had zero (0) reported accidents in 2000 and zero (0) reported accidents in 2001. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 3.) The pedestrian volumes across the minor approach (that which would be stopping) is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during the A.M. and P.M. peak traffic hours. The intersection of Adams Street & 4 th Avenue does not meet the requirement. 4.) If the safe stopping distance of the minor approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and/or vertical roadway alignment or by other permanent obstructions. Sight distance is not an issue at this intersection. The intersection does not meet the requirement. Does the Intersection of Adams Street and 4th Avenue Meet the 1' for 1 Stop Sign? A stop sign is warranted if three of the following five conditions exist: (Conditions are from the Shakopee Signing Manual, October 26, 1998) . 1.) If the major street traffic volume is more than 1500 vehicles per day and the minor street traffic volume is greater than 750 vehicles per day. The major street, Adams Street, does not meet the requirement for traffic volume with an average daily count of 617. The minor street, 4th Street, has an average daily count of 125 vehicles. This intersection does not meet the requirement. 2.) 'There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous years of a type correctable with stop sign installation. The intersection of Adams Street & 4th Avenue had zero (0) reported accidents in 2000 and zero (0) reported accidents in 2001. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 3.) If the pedestrian volumes crossing any approach is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during the A.M. and P.M. peal: traffic hours. The intersection of Adams Street & 4 th Avenue does not meet the requirement. 4.) If the safe stopping distance on the uncontrolled approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and /or vertical roadway alignment or by other permanent obstructions. Sight distance is not an issue at this intersection. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 5.) If the 85" percentile speed in the intersection is greater than 35mph and highest reported speed with two or more observations greater than 45mph. The speed at this intersection was found to have an 85 percentile speed of 38 mph. The intersection does meet the requirement. M 11 •, 1 1 t , Adams St. Adams St. 4th Ave. Time (North) (South) (West) 15:00 50 51 7 16:00 33 35 9 17:00 30 31 5 18:00 27 28 6 19:00 26 27 5 20:00 28 27 2 21:00 27 23 7 22:00 17 19 4 23:00 7 12 6 0:00 0 0 0 1:00 1 6 5 2:00 1 1 0 3:00 9 9 0 4:00 10 11 1 5:00 21 20 6 6:00 48 50 6 7:00 45 45 5 8:00 32 31 6 9:00 32 33 6 10:00 29 31 4 11:00 40 40 2 12:00 33 42 15 13:00 42 44 7 14:00 43 46 7 •, 1 1 t , Adams St. Adams St. 4th Ave. Time (North) (South) (West) 15:00 39 36 9 16:00 40 45 5 17:00 33 39 6 18:00 32 35 5 19:00 40 41 2 20:00 13 15 7 21:00 20 19 4 22:00 19 20 6 23:00 7 11 0 0:00 3 3 5 1:00 1 1 0 2:00 0 0 0 3:00 7 7 1 4:00 11 11 6 5 :00 16 18 6 6:00 39 39 5 7:00 27 29 6 8:00 24 24 6 9:00 33 29 4 10:00 33 30 2 11:00 45 39 15 12:00 32 36 7 13:00 30 32 14 14:00 36 35 7 CITY OF SHAKOPEE DATE .. • Daily Traffic Volume Report 08-16-01 .. . m 7 C Q ? O � O C N m � YI � h c � y 3 Q. Q � � o Q C ' O O � m � d � � Q i �I m d � L rE p , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 0 p m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m S �J M1tasceud � L 'c n m m C E 'Q � N L t0 L a h m C L CL E CL E 7 4 v 'p _ CL L a - 4 m Y 'D L a n L a rf � L E M ,D N O. E O m N CO v Q to (") L a L a N � N N L L Y' dNl SS�tg nt p ell o 0 r o $ f m o ' u'r ° oO p '•t t4 > - �Cl m n t7 01 N 0 0 Vf t7 O N� < tD N C) f�f N N N N O fD O N O< C7 t7 t7 < V C O L N N o tp N O N to T o c7 < C7 f7 R N C] O n c7 N N N c7 M M C� CJ O > 2 g�4� C C 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S O O O O O O O O O O O O coo g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0$ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O o O 000 o o O O O 000000 N C7 < - O 0 . m O p � m . • ruvpt= 1= 1 1 t 4' J..: �• Tr 115:14 A.t '';'' :.• X ;` ,aft.. �" _ 1 Market Street South - Heading Northbound Market Street North - Heading Southbound 1 , . F N . si" i 4 „.a, - lam .- 1 Shakopee Ave West - Heading Eastbound Shakopee Ave East - Heading Westbound 1 poiliiii 1 Intersection Photos: SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 Market Street 1 Engineering Department and City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street Shakopee Ave. 1 Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (952) 445 -3650 August 24, 2001 200 0 200 SCALE: 1 " = 200' SHEET No. W& MARKET ST AND SHAK®PEE SHAKOPEE AVENUE 1 cammumypmxsm=mW TRAFFIC STUDY Does the Intersection of Market Street and Shakopee Aven Meet the op Sign? A stop sign is warranted if two of the following four conditions exist: (Conditions are from the Shakopee Signing Manual, October 26, 1998) 1.) If the major street traffic volume is more than 1000 vehicles per day and the Minor street traffic volume is less than 50% of the major street traffic volume. The major street, Skakopee Avenue, does not meet the requirement for traffic volume with an average daily count of 769. The minor street, Market Street, has an average daily count of 697 vehicles. This intersection does not meet the requirement. 2.) There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous years of a type correctable with stop sign installation. The intersection of Market Street & Shakopee Avenue had one (1) reported accident in 2000 and one (1) reported accident in 2001. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 3.) The pedestrian volumes across the minor approach (that which would be stopping) is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during the A.M. and P.M. peak traffic hours. The intersection of Market Street & Shakopee Avenue does not meet the requirement. 4.) If the safe stopping distance of the minor approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and/or vertical roadway alignment or by other permanent obstructions. Sight distance is not an issue at this intersection. The intersection does not meet the requirement. Does 1 - Intersection of i; 1 Shakopee Meet the 1 for 1 Stop Sign A stop sign is warranted if three of the following five conditions exist: (Conditions are from the Shakopee Signing Manual, October 26, 1998) 1.) If the major street traffic volume is more than 1500 vehicles per day and the minor street traffic volume is greater than 750 vehicles per day. The major street, Shakopee Avenue, does not meet the requirement for traffic volume with an average daily count of 769. The minor street, Market Street, has an average daily count of 697 vehicles. This intersection does not meet the requirement. 2.) 'There has been more than two reported accidents, per year in the previous two years or, three reported accidents in the previous years of a type correctable with stop sign installation. The intersection of Market Street & Shakopee Avenue had one (1) reported accident in 2000 and one (1) reported accident in 2001. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 3.) If the pedestrian volumes crossing any approach is more than 15 pedestrians per hour during the A.M. and P.M. peak traffic hours. The intersection of Market Street & Shakopee Avenue does not meet the requirement. 4.) If the safe stopping distance on the uncontrolled approach is restricted by less than 300 feet by horizontal and/or vertical roadway alignment or by other permanent obstructions. Sight distance is not an issue at this intersection. The intersection does not meet the requirement. 5.) If the 85` percentile speed in the intersection is greater than 35ph and highest reported speed with two or more observations greater than 45p. The speed at this intersection was found to have an 85` percentile speed of 30 mph. The intersection does not meet the requirement. • 1 11 Time Market St. (North) Market St. (South) Shakopee (East) Shakopee Ave. (West) 12:00 39 36 52 50 13:00 42 33 37 43 14:00 39 35 44 44 15:00 68 54 58 55 16:00 67 62 66 63 17:00 66 43 66 69 18:00 62 43 72 62 19:00 40 36 47 57 20:00 43 41 44 39 21:00 24 23 31 28 22:00 13 12 19 20 23:00 6 7 17 15 0:00 2 7 15 15 1:00 5 4 6 8 2:00 1 0 2 1 3:00 1 2 3 1 4:00 2 2 7 8 5:00 15 11 11 6 6:00 35 26 20 18 7:00 47 36 31 26 8:00 36 28 35 29 9:00 40 36 26 21 10:00 32 29 32 33 11:00 35 31 43 47 Daily Vehicle 760 63 84 58 Count ;• 11 Time 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 Market St. Market St. (North) (South) 52 38 30 29 49 40 59 52 83 63 72 55 56 45 53 50 40 33 24 16 25 16 2 2 7 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 8 7 18 12 37 30 37 37 36 31 32 27 13 22 0 45 Shakopee Shakopee Ave. Ave. (West) (East) 41 39 42 40 41 40 62 58 66 63 71 70 70 68 68 65 44 33 31 34 20 10 13 13 14 10 8 8 3 3 3 3 6 7 11 7 21 14 33 25 35 31 27 28 27 21 43 42 CITY OF SHAKOPEE DATE PREPARED: I�t�? I'' ICI T Re 08-24-0 SHAKOPEE AVE. Ln w Y Q 745 ® - fin Mam X9 Total Daily Volume- Entering Intersection: 2931 North - 25.5% South - 22.0% East - 27.1 % West - 25.4% INTERSECTION MARKET ST. & SHAKOPEE AVE. IN SHAKOPEE FROM - 08/20/01 T_0 08 22 01 SOURCE Traffic Counts t o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r o 0 o r + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m L L m m L '1S iw erN E E CL CL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m '4 m m t L L L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 1 O m 'a v L L CL o. E E v v L L a °- a r o o r o r o r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r r r o r o o r r r 0-0000-0000N r r r o o r y 4 , m L L CL c L C O. CL N M O N r N < m N r l7 r m !� ---- r r N m --- FI m t D N N L L n n . N r r r r r r r r N N r r r r r r r N N L L N O a CL a a - - `� 77 Goys U H O m � O C7 �O m m t� <' � t7 r .- r r N t7 C') N t7 < n N > N =? d. w o H o I� go y r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w j o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = UJ R y M � ,q,g tV fM ? m I� m Qf N N N N r N t7 C �A f0 t� m W O Q r N t7 C �d fG t� 9 Q� C N N C�V O N C7 < in m !. m Q) O r m poi+,e^4,�'�;t�i,'�"�z.. �� rrr'- r.-r r T N C rrrrrrrr r m 0 N 0 0 0 c> O N N o m N O H O vi s ��w m L m m L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m t h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m e L O. Y e L a Y m L a Cl O L a E r� o� r o m n� e , m e � �n r• o N °" `` �^ M m N L a N N L n p N e t7 N N e f7 �O t7 M N 0 0 0 0 0 0 �• �• N C') O f7 O N m O ^ O �V o r � w m N O m N m m m N 0 l7 a t7 m N N O O r m O N m m m e e N H N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q E iv vi e�rimrmu�c— NVio: =ci ci viii is �m cio� a CD �p o � [D = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m t E m m L E m m L E m L E m e L n E Y L n Y m L a a E M L a `+ E r�NC�rM�O�Orno� —mono cD n M N L n E A m m e N �R m N 0 0 [7 m m m e 0 N N N L n "� E Neemr�ee�c�NOO�- �000.- oo�m�o ^ Q O e N m � a O N o r 0 O � O N m N O m m h N m t7 O e �'1 N r t7 O O m m r r m N f7 O nl r N N O 3 r w j o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cue c J l "' L i ' / Y I awe ONSifEEiNaiE -• -..- - .- �+ NiF - C77Gd ®N ®E -:.� - I � � ®FT ®g ® I ijoJ7E S /1S i�IJTE a _ CAfp lM, i7� PQdT ��c / gA7tYE y 1 �s a w 1 -7 Ig . r7 - -- o ,.. —A 0 0 1 SERVK743) AND/OR STUE AWKXANCE RUN NUMBEP(S)