HomeMy WebLinkAboutDecember 19, 1978 r `
r TENTATIVE AGENDA
SPECIAL SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 19, 1978
Mayor Harbeck presiding
11 Roll Call at 5 : 00 P.M. -- Council ' s option on agenda!
21 Adjourn at 6 :00 P.M.
31 Roll Call at 7 : 00 P.M. for Adj .Reg. Session
41 7 : 00 P.M. Joint Meeting with Jackson Township re : sanitary sewer service
5] Recess for a Special H.R.A. Meeting
61 Reconvene
71 Approve Minutes of December 5, 1978
81 Communications :
91 Liaison reports from Councilmembers :
a] Cncl .Hullander from Shakopee School Board
b] Cncl .Lebens from Recreation Board
c ] Cncl .Reinke from Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
d] Cncl .Ward from Joint Seven Man Committee
e ] Cncl .Leroux from Shakopee Fire Department
f] Mayor Harbeck from Scott County Board of Commissioners
101 RECOGNITION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANYONE PRESENT IN THE AUDIENCE
WHO DESIRES TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA!
11 ] Old Business :
a] Res . No. 1332 - Authorizing the Making and Delivery of A Quit
Claim Deed - tbld. December 5th
b] Ord. No . 17 - Park Dedication, Public Sites and Open Spaces
tbld. December 5th
121 Planning Commission Recommendations :
131 Routine Resolutions and Ordinances
a] Res . No. 1345 - Accepting Work on 1977-1 Improvement , Project
No. 1 (Eaglewood and Horizon Heights)
b] Res . No. 1346 - Ordering Preparation of A Report on An Improve-
ment (Holmes St . from lst to 10th)
c ] Res . No . 1347 - Adopting the 1979 Pay Schedule for the Officers
and Non-Union Employees of the City of Shakopee Minnesota
d] Res . No . 1348 - Minn. Department of Transportation Federal
Aid Form No. 111
e ] Res . No . 1349 - Authorizing the City Engr. to Obtain Needed
Engineering and Technical Services from the Mn. DOT
141 New Business :
a] O' Dowd Lake Property - Current purchase with FY 178 grant and
application for future acquisition' s grant :
1 ] Res . 1344 - Authorizing the Purchase of Property on O'Dowd
Lake for Park Purposes
21 Motion authorizing the appropriate officials to execute
an amendment to the Option Agreement for purchase of
property on O' Dowd Lake
3] Res . 1343 - Authorizing Filing of Application for Grant
to Acquire Open Space . . .
4] Res . 1342 - Adopting the City of Shakopee ' s 5-Year Action
Plan for Parks and Open Space
b] 8 : 30 P.M. - Application by new stockholders for liquor licenses
for Wittles , Inc . dba/Rock Spring Supper Club
Tentative Agenda
December 19 , 1978
Page -2-
c] Report on the alley behind City Hall
d] Report on Engineering Staffing
e ] City Engineer ' s status report on public improvement projects
f ] Discussion on 3rd Avenue extension to CR-17
g] Approval of Revised By-Laws of Shakopee Fire Department
Relief Association (approved by Fire Dept . 12/11/78)
h] Award bids for police cars
i ] DeGross Claim:
11 Authorize payment of $6 ,000 to Agnes DeGross
21 Approve bills for appraisal services : Sharkey Appraisal
Services - $300; Wiley Appraisal Inc. - $350; Patchin
Appraisals - $512. 50
j ] Sale of City land
k] Approval of bills
I ] Industrial Revenue Bonds for Perkins Cake & Steak
m] Set public hearing for K-Mart Tax Increment Project - Redevelop-
ment Plan - January 2nd
n) 10:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of the Suspension-
Revocation of the Sunday and On Sale Liquor License of
The Original Doc Holliday' s , Inc . - located at CR-89 and Hwy 101
151 Consent Business :
161 Other Business :
a] Authorize purchase of equipment in Engineering Dept . & Res .
No . 1350, Amending 1978 General Fund Budget
171 Adjourn!
-- H A P P Y H 0 L I D A Y S ! --
TENTATIVE AGENDA
SHAKOPEE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
SPECIAL SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 19, 1978
Chrm.Lebens presiding
11 Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M.
21 Approval of Minutes of December 5 , 1978
31 K-Mart Tax Increment Project - Redevelopment Plan
4] Other business :
51 Adjourn.
Nancy Engman
Executive Director
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE
SHAKOPEE HOUSING � REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
REGULAR MEETING SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA DECEMBER 5 , 1978
Chrm. Lebens called the meeting to order at 7 : 30 P .M. with Comm. Ward ,
Leroux, and Hullander present . Comm. Reinke was absent .
Leroux/Hullander moved to approve the October 3 , 1978 , Minutes , as
kept . Motion carried unanimously .
Ward/Leroux moved to authorize the execution of a contract with the
City of Shakopee for operation of the 1978 Community Development
Program. Motion carried unanimously .
Hullander/Leroux moved to recommend to the City Council that an agree-
ment for appraisal services be executed with "Patchin Appraisals Inc ."
for completion of the appraisal work necessary for the 1978 Community
Development Program, for a sum not to exceed $4 ,800 . 00 . Motion
carried unanimously.
Leroux/Hullander moved to recommend to the City Council that a contract
for relocation services be executed with Von Klug $ Associates , Inc . for
the relocation work required for the 1978 Community Development
Program, for a sum not to exceed $11 , 395 . 00 . Motion carried unan-
imously .
The Execute Director reported on the status of the 70 elderly units ,
stating that funds have not as yet been approved .
Hullander/Ward moved to recommend to the City Council that the City
acquire the properties involved in the 1978 Community Development
Program (4th and Minnesota ) at a price to be determined through the
fair market appraisal process . Motion carried unanimously .
Hullander/Leroux moved to adjourn at 7 : 45 P .M. Motion carried unan-
imously .
Nancy Engman
Executive Director
Iz-
MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing & Redevelopment Authority
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Proposed Redevelopment Plan for Tax Increment Project
DATE: December 14, 1978 .
Attached is a proposed redevelopment plan for the K-Mart Tax
Increment Project . This must be approved by the HRA and then submitted
to the Planning Commission and the City Council . The City Council will
hold a hearing on it before they can approve it .
The appropriate representatives will be at the City Council
meeting to discuss this plan.
DSR/jsc
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
for
Valley Industrial Park Redevelopment
Project No. 1
The Housing and Redevelopment
Authority in and for the City
of Shakopee
A. Table of Contents
B. Description of Redevelopment Project
1. Legal Description
2. Statement of Need
3. Redevelopment Plan Objectives
4. Proposed Redevelopment Activities
C. Property Acquisition
1. Property to be Acquired
2. Cost
D. Land Use
1. Permitted Use
2. Additional Regulation
E. Site Preparation
1. Preparation Activities
2. Estimates of Costs
F. Land Disposition
1. Lease
2. Disposition Value
G. Financing
1. Tax Increment Certification
2. Estimated Tax Increment
H. Relocation
I. Redeveloper Obligations
J. Modification of Plan
B. Description of Redevelopment Project
1. Legal description:
Lot 1, Block 1, Valley Park, 3rd Addition,
City of Shakopee, Minnesota
2. Statement of Peed
The Redevelopment Project consists of approximately
one hundred (100) acres located along County Road 83 ,
south of Valley Industrial Boulevard, in the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota.
The land within the Redevelopment Project is
open and undeveloped. It is located within the City,
but because of location, layout and drainage has not
been developed by private enterprise and therefore is
stagnant and unproductive. Through acquisition and
installation of necessary utilities and improvements
by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, this vacant
and unused property can be readied for private redevel-
opment and thus contribute to the health, safety,
welfare and economic well-being of the City.
3. Redevelopment Plan Objectives
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the
City of Shakopee through this Redevelopment Plan, seek
to achieve the following objectives :
a. To provide logical and organized land
use for the area consistent with the City compre-
hensive plan.
b. To eliminate blighting influences which
to date have impeded potential development in the
area.
C. To provide safe and adequate drainage in
the area.
d. To provide adequate utilities and other public
improvements and facilities to enhance the area for both
new and existing development.
e. To stimulate commercial and industrial
development in the Project area and in the City.
-2-
f. To provide increased employment and to
supplement the financial and tax base of the City.
g. To provide maximum opportunity, consistent
with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for
redevelopment by private enterprise.
4 . Proposed Redevelopment Activities
Redevelopment activity in Valley Industrial Park
Redevelopment Project No. 1 will consist of the following:
a. Acquisition of real property within the
Redevelopment Project.
b. The construction and placement of all
necessary utilities, including water, gas, sanitary
sewer and storm sewer.
C. The construction of municipal well and water
storage facilities.
d. The sale of tax increment revenue bonds
to finance items (a) through (c) pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 462.551 and 462 . 585.
e. The sale of the improved site to a private
developer for the purpose of constructing a one-story
warehouse and distribution center containing approxi-
mately Nine hundred and seventy thousand (970, 000)
square feet, together with truck docks, office complex
and maintenance facility.
C. Property Acquisition
1. Property to be Acquired
Subject to execution of a redevelopment contract
with a private developer which (1) provides assurances
of construction satisfactory to the Housing and Rede-
velopment Authority and (2) enables the sale of tax
increment revenue bonds in an amount sufficient to pay
for the Redevelopment activities described in Section
B4 , the Housing and Redevelopment Authority will acquire
all property within the Redevelopment Project as de-
scribed in Section B1.
-3-
2. Cost
It is estimated that the cost of acquiring the
property described in Section B1, through negotiation
or condemnation, will be approximately one million
one hundred thousand ($1 , 100 , 000. 00) dollars.
D. Land Use
1. Permitted Use
All new development on land acquired by the
Mousing and Redevelopment Authority in the Redevel-
opment Project shall be as permitted in the
category of the Shakopee zoning ordinance.
2 . Additional Regulation
All new development on land acquired by the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in the Redev-
elopment Project shall be used in a manner consis-
-tent with this Redevelopment Plan as well as all
applicable state and local codes and ordinances ,
including provisions of the Shakopee zoning ordinance.
E. Site Preparation
1. Preparation Activities
Activities by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
to prepare the site for development may include the
following:
a. Tree removal and/or relocation.
b. Excavation of unstable soil and replace-
ment and compaction of granular fill to accommodate
development construction.
C. Placement of water, gas, sanitary sewer
and storm sewer utilities.
d. Administration, planning and engineering
required to obtain bids for improvements, issue
bonds and implement resale of land.
-4-
2 . Estimates of Costs
Administration
Planning and Cost Analysis $_
Engineering, Surveys and Tests
Legal --
Capital Costs
Land Acquisition $1,100 ,000
Excavation and Fill 720 ,000
Utilities 700,000
Water Storage Tank 1,100 , 000
Municipal Well 250 ,000
$3 ,870 , 000
F. Land Disposition
1. Sale
Prior to acquisition of property within the Rede-
velopment Project, and subject to all required public
hearings, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority will
enter into a Redevelopment Contract with K-Mart Corpo-
ration. The Contract will contain such assurances and
guarantees as are required by Minnesota Statutes,
Section 462 . 525 and as will enable the sale of tax
increment revenue bonds.
2. Disposition Value
Prior to disposition of property within the Rede-
velopment Project, the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority shall, as an aid to it in determining the
rental therefore, place an estimated fair market rental
value upon the land, such value to be based on planned
use and taking into consideration the restrictions and
limitations imposed by this plan and estimated to be
$700 , 000.
G. Financing
1. Tax Increment Certification
Upon approval of this Redevelopment Plan by the
City Council, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
shall request the County Auditor to certify the Project' s
original assessed value pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 462. 585 . Assessed value in excess of this
-5-
certified amount, attributable primarily to value added
by redevelopment, will result in tax increment. This
tax increment will be pledged to the retirement of debt
incurred by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to
finance the redevelopment activities described in
Section B4 .
2. Estimated Tax Increment
Estimated costs of Housing and
Redevelopment Authority $
Estimated costs of Redevelopment
Project to be financed by the
private developer
Estimated annual debt service
Estimated annual tax increment
See Appendix "A"
H. Relocation
The property within the Redevelopment Project is vacant
and unoccupied. Therefore, there will be no relocation obli-
gation pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 117 . 52 .
I. Redeveloper obligations
The general requirements to be imposed upon the
redeveloper are:
a. To redevelop the land within the Project
in accordance with this Redevelopment Plan.
b. To submit all construction plans to
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority for review
and approval.
C. To commence and complete the construction
of improvements within such reasonable period of
time as determined by the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority.
d. Not to discriminate on the basis of race,
color, creed, sex or national origin in the construc-
tion of the facility or in the employment of personnel.
-6-
A
e. To devote the land only to the uses permitted
by this Redevelopment Plan for a period of twenty (20)
years from the date of the conveyance by the Housing
and Redevelopment Authority.
f. To pay promptly when due all real e.state
taxes and special assessments.
g. To take no action which would cause the
property within the Project to become exempt from
real estate taxation for so long as tax increment
revenue bonds are outstanding.
h. To comply with all applicable provisions of
the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act, Minnesota
Statutes, Section 462. 411, et seq.
J. Modification of Plan
The Redevelopment Plan may be modified at any time
before or after the sale of the Project area provided the
modification shall be adopted by the Authority and the City
Council upon such notice and after such public hearing as is
required for the original adoption of the Redevelopment
Plan: Provided, however, that where the Authority determines
the necessity of changes in the approved Redevelopment Plan,
or approved modification thereof, which changes do not alter
or affect exterior boundaries, or do not substantially alter
or affect the general land uses established in such a plan,
such changes shall not constitute a modification of the
Redevelopment Plan nor require approval by the City Council.
-7-
6
1311 1 L,DABU RESIDENTIAL LOTS
LOTS 51";1 V I CL:1> WITH SEWER & WATER
Er11 le H1uC1':3 �)nd �,•I
J , E .J n(I 28
Westview :3rd 1
Westview 4th 1
Westview t)tll
Prairie View 1st 1 + 3 Outlots
Pr-airie View grid 8
Jackson View 14
Minnesota Valley lst; ,
Minnesota Valley 2nd 18
117 + Various Lots in f,)
1,OTS SERVICED WITH WATER ONLY
sec . 8 along; Mauer '1'rai I 3
3
LOT'S WITHOUT ANY SI:IiV I CI�;S
Ea1;.1 ewoo(I I s ,
Eag,1 ewood
Eapl ewooci :3rd 4
Hori,%orn Ilei.ghts I :A 2y
Florizora Hei rht:i ;'rid
Horizon Height"; :3rd 6
Riverview E:;tate;> I
Deerview Acres 7
Tirnber Trai I s ,,I
Killarney 1I.i 1 1 r3 16
Montecito Ile.if,laL:: 'r�d
Deans Lake Area
Maras Area ,
I ? I
PROPOSED PLAT";
Jackson View ;,ncJ ;3;3
Prairie View 3rd
Minnesota Val Iey ;3rd 70
Hillside Estates 14
Weinandt Acre.,; 3?
Hauers 2nd 41
Eag 1 ewood 4th 3,3
There fi gures Lnc ieato lots that. remain in developers name. Some of
those that have been :,old sti I I rema i n vacant.
CITY OF $ H4 ]KOpE
,. E
129 kart First Avenue, Shuku
• P ��: pee, Minnesota 55379
M E M O HRA Agenda : Other Business
�w
Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: Nancy Engman, HRA Director
SUBJECT: Survey & _TopOgraL:�hical Work on 4th & Minnesota
DATE. ___ December 1_9 , 1978
Two firms have submitted proposals to complete survey
and topographical work completed on Fourth and Minnesota
Street . The ' firms and estimates are as follows :
a) Suburban Engineering $3500.00
b) Schoell & Madson $4850.00.
This survey work does not include the Fox and Weiler
property as a recent survey of the property already exists .
Some additional work may be required on that survey in order
to relate it to the survey work on the remaining parcels being
required . This would be done at additional costs . , My
discussions with Suburban indicate that the maximum cost for
these extra work items would be $1000, which is still lower
than the competing proposal .
I recommend that we hire Suburban Engineering for this
work. They can start on the project immediately, and the
survey work is needed for completion of the appraised
reports on these properties .
Action Required : Authorization for the appropriate
official to enter into an agreement with Suburban
Engineering for survey and topographical work on
NE/jiw 4th and Minnesota Street in Shakopee .
MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder , City Administrator
RE: Proposed Park Dedication Ordinance
DATE: December 14 , 1978
Attached is a survey of neighboring communities which we conduct-
ed this week and a broader survey conducted by another city some time
ago . It is apparent from these surveys that there is no science to
requiring park dedication.
In the first example the dedication requirement on a 40 acre ,
120 lot plat varies from two to six acres and from $6,000 to $33,000.
I have , however , made some conclusions from the surveys .
1 . I believe we should let the industrial and commercial dedica-
tion go as proposed on a per acre basis payable at time of plat or at
time of building permit if a developer ' s agreement is signed.
2. The per unit basis for a cash donation for residential property
has some merit and I would propose the following alternative :
$250 per single family lot
$400 per duplex
$ 75 per bedroom for multiple family units
If cash is required , this gives the developer with the very large
lots a break because he will pay only for each lot and not on a per
acre basis . If and when the lots were further subdivided in the future ,
a park dedication would be required each time a new lot was created.
The one problem with this approach is that from time to time the
City Council will have to raise the per unit donation to keep up with
the increasing cost of land and recreation equipment .
If this concept is acceptable , I will have the ordinance ready
for the next Council meeting.
DSR/jsc
:�edicatl:.n
city Yes No Cash Dedication Land Dedication Combination Dedication
y "Anoka X 10% of the total cash value of Amount of land equivalent to 10% Combination of land and cash
land of value of land for Parks, equivalent to 10% of the
Playgrounds , Public Open Space value of land
or Storm water holding areas.
Arden Hills X Residential Residential No Provisions in Ordinance
Cash Dedication according to Land Dedication according to
value of land x percentage in same table as cash except per-
table below: % centage of total land area being
Gross Density/Acre Dedication subdivided
0-2 dwelling units 10%
2-3 it 11%
3-4 01 12%
4 or more City Council discretion
of 12 to 15%
Commercial or Industrial Commercial or Industrial No Provisions in Ordinance
Dedication not to exceed 15% of Same as cash except 15% of land
land value to be determined by area to be developed
the council
Blaine X RI, R2 and FR Districts RI , R2 and FR Districts No Provisions in Ordinance
15% of fair market value of land 10% of land to be subdivided
to be subdivided.
R3 and R4 Districts R3 and R4 Districts
12' % of fair market value plus 12' % of land area to be subdivided
equivalent amount of $50 .00
apartment unit or residence unit B1, B2, B3, I1 ,and J2
permitted 5% of total proposed area
Brooklyn Center X No Policy or Ordinance No Policy or Ordinance No Policy or Ordinance
Brooklyn Park X Lot size 100 ' wide or larger 5%, Lot size 100 ' wide or larger 5%, No Provisions in Ordinance
Lot size less than 100 ' wide 10% Lot size less than 100 ' wide 10%
of fair market value of land to of total land to be subdivided
be subdivided _
• ,�. •! ,{... r . _ C!Gl-' •.i,r,'•'i- ` CiC� F G' i 1 d.t e:.nS.•. C... ..,�._�C��`` ,
le Y
C+ i
C.ty Yes No Cash Dedication Land Dedication Combination Dedication.
Burnsville X Residential % of Residential % of Combination of cash and
t City Councils dis-
cretion aa
Units/acre Contribution/acre Units acre Contribution/acre land land
1-6 10% 1-6 10%
7+ 7.5% 7+ 7.5%
of fair market value of land of total land area being sub-
being subdivided divided
Commercial/Industrial Commercial/Industrial
5% of fair market value of land 5% of total land area being de-
beina developed velo ed
Coon Rapids X Residential Residential No Provisions in Ordinance
Dwelling units/acre Percentage Dwelling units/acre Percentage
0-1 5% 0-1 5%
2-3 105'. 2-3 10%
4-5 12% 4-5 12%
6-7 14% 6-7 14%
8-12 16% 8-12 16%
13-16 18% 13-16 18%
of fair market value of land to of total land to be subdivided
be subdivided
Industrial Industrial
5% of fair market value 5% of land area
Commercial Commercial
3% of gross land area 3% of gross land area
Cottage Grove X Residential Residential Any combination of land and
Cash Dedication as per table be- cash subject to council ap-
low: 10% of undeveloped land proposed proval
Single family dwelling--$150/unit for subdivision plus additional
Double family dwelling--$150/unit cash according to following
table
Apartments and Townhouses-
1 Bedroom $35/Bedroom Single family dwelling $50/unit
2 Bedroom $35/Bedroom Double family dwelling $50/unit
3 Bedroom _ $35-/Bedroom
Apartments .and Townhouses-
1 Bedroom $10/Bedroom
2 Bedroom $10/Bedroom
3 Bedroom or more $10/Bedroom
1 -
^ ty Yes No Cash Dedication Land Dedication Combination Dedication
Cottage Grove Commercial/Industrial Commercial/Industrial
(Cont. ) X Cash Dedication equivalent to fair 10% of land to be subdivided
market value of land to be sub-
divided, dedication not to exceed
500 acre
Eagan X Residential Residential Combination of land and
Single Family $120/unit 10% of total area to be subdivided cash dedication at the
Duplex/Townhouse $100/unit Councils discretion not
Mobile Homes $100/unit Commercial/Industrial to exceed 10% of Land/
Apartment $ 75/unit No Provisions in Ordinance
Cash value.
Based on land value of 3000 acre
Eden Prairie X Residential Units Fee Per Reasonable portion of land equiv- No Provisions in Ordinance
Per Acre Unit' alent to cash dedication
Single Family Detached $275 .
Other Residential Uses $200 .
Commercial/Office/Industrial
1200 acre
Edina X 5% of cash value of all land with- 5% of total land to be subdivided Combined dedication not to
in subdivision or developed exceed 5%
Golden Valley X 10% of fair market value of land 10% of total land to be subdivided No Provisions in Ordinance
to be subdivided
Hopkins X Subdivision Ordinance requires Same as Cash Dedication Same
5% dedication of staff and council
discretion to obtain something
they want.
Inver Grove Proposed Residential Proposed Residential No Provisions in proposed
Heights X Using formula for land dedication Amount of land to be dedicated Ordinance
to determine area, then apply shall be computed according to
fair market value to land for following formula:
cash dedication persons
(#units) (persons/unit) = 250
=acres of land to be dedicated
Commercial Industrial
2 to 5% of gross land
Dedication '
city Yes No Cash Dedication Land Dedication Combination Dedication
Maple Grove X No Provisions in Ordinance Residential No Provisions in Ordinance
Land dedication according to fol-
lowing table : Dedication
Dwelling units/acre Requirement
0-3 5%
4-5 7. 5%
6-8 10%
9 - add 1% for each dwelling
unit over 8
Commercial/Industrial
' % of total land area
Mounds View X Residential Ded.• Residential No Provisions in Ordinance
Dwelling Units/acre Per Acre 10% Land Dedication
0 72 $100 Commercial/Industrial
2. 1-3 $150 10% of total land area to be
3.1-4 $200
4 . 1-5 $250 developed
Over 5=10% of fair market value
Commercial/Industrial
10% of fair market value of
total lard area
Rosemount X Council may require cash in lieu 4% of land/dwelling unit per acre No Provisions in Ordinance
of land at fair market of land to in subdivision. (0 . 4 x acreage x
be dedicated number of dwelling units)
Council may request more land if
deemed necessary.
St. Anthony X X Only require dedication on P.U.D. Only require dedication on P.U.D. No Provisions in Ordinance
which. is 10% cash value of total which is 10% of total land area
land to be developed. City is being developed.
90% developed.
city Yes No Cash Dedication Land Dedication Combination Dedication
\1
Shoreview X Residential 10% of total area to be sub- No Provisions in Ordinance
Cash Dedication according to divided residential, commercial,
following table : Ded./acre or industrial
as fair
market val-
Dwelling units/acre ue of land
0 3%
2.1 4%
3.1 5%
4. 1 6%
5. 1 or more 10%
Commercial/Industrial
10% of fair market value of total
land area to be subdivided.
Woodbury X Residential Residential No Provisions in Ordinance
10% of fair market value of tot- 10% of gross land area
al subdivision or $300/lot which Commercial/Industrial
ever is greater.
Commercial/Industrial 10% of gross land area
10% of fair market value of the
undeveloped land.
Duplex-$400/lot
Multiple Dwellings-$100/unit or a
percentage of fair market value
according to the following table,
which ever is greater.
% of gross
area or fair
Dwelling Unit/Acre market value
0-2 D.U./Acre 10%
2 . 1 -3.0 D.U./Acre 11%
3 . 1-4.0 D.U./Acre 12%
4 . 1-5 .0 D.U./Acre 13%
5 .1-6 .0 D.U./Acre 14%
6. 1-7.0 D.U./Acre 15%
7.1-8.0 D.U./Acre 16%
Dedication
City Yes No Cash Dedication Land Dedication Combination Dedication
. % of gross
area or fair
Woodbury Market
(Cont. ) X Dwelling_Unit Acre Value
8.1-9.0 D.U./Acre 17%
9 .1-10 .0 D.U./Acre 18%
10. 1-11.0 D.U./Acre 19%
11 .1-12 .0 D.U./Acre 20%
12 . 1-13.0 D.U./Acre 21%
13. 1-14.0 D.U./Acre 21%
14 . 1-15 .0 D.U./Acre 23%
Fridley X Residential Residential Option of land dedica-
10% of gross area to be subdi- 10% of gross area to be subdivid- tion or cash payment is
vided ed at discretion of the
City Council
Commercial/Industrial Commercial/Industrial
3% of aross area to be subdivided 3% of gross area to be subdivided
Maplewood X Acre Demand (AD) = No Policy in Ordinance No Provisions in Ordi-
# of Dwelling Units x Pop./D.U. nance
Population Standard of 100
Park Charge : This Project=
AD (A.C.+D.C. )
No. of D.U.
A.D.-Acre Demand for the project
A.C.-Currently adopted/acre Acqui-
sition cost
D.C.-Currently adopted/acre De-
velopment cost
Project : Subdivision of 25 single
family lots
Population Standard: Single fam-
ily dwelling 4 people/unit
Currently Adopted Acquisition
Cost : $6 , 000/acre
Currently Adopted Development
Cost : $6 , 000/acre
Dedication
City- Yesi No Cash Dedication Land Dedication Combination Dedication
1,
Maplewood 25 units x 4 eople/unit=100
�
(Cont. ) X A.D.= --p
100 100
=1 Acre
Park 1 ($6 , 000+ $6 , 000 _ 12 .000
Charge= 25 Units 25
Park Charge :$480 .00 collected at
the time of building permit
issuance
PARK DEDICATION QUESTIONNAIRE
By: Shakopee , Minnesota December 125 1978
WHAT IS THE REQUIRED DEDICATION FOR:
Industrial Property -
City Cash Land Comments
Burnsville 5% of the current 5%
market land value
Chanhassen $1000/acre 100 people/ The cash formula is a proposed formula .
acre City Admin. would prefer the cash formula
be based on density.
Chaska 5% of the raw land 5%
value
Eag&n No charge No required City Council feels the high taxes paid should
dedication satisfy park dedication.
Eden Prairie $1200/acre No land City buys park land needed . Per chance develop-
accepted ment is in proposed park site , acreage is
determined on type of proposed dwellings .
Prior Lake 10% of raw land value 10%
Savage 10% of current 10%
market land value
I
Park Dedication Questionnair (cont . ) Page 2
r
WHAT IS THE REQUIRED DEDICATION FOR:
Commercial Property
City Cash Land Comments
Burnsville 5% of the current 5%
market land value
Chanhassen $1000/acre 100 people/ The cash formula is a proposed formula .
acre City Admin. would prefer the cash formula
be established on density .
Chaska 5% of the raw land 5%
value
Eagan No charge No required City Council feels the high taxes paid
dedication satisfies all park dedication requirements .
Eden Prairie $1200/acre No land City buys park land needed . Per chance develop-
accepted ment is in proposed park site, acreage is
determined on type of proposed dwellings .
Prior Lake 10% of raw land value 10%
Savage 10% of current market 10%
land value
Park Dedication Questionnaire (cont . ) Page 3
r�
WHAT IS THE REQUIRED DEDICATION FOR:
Single Family -
City Cash Land Comments
Burnsville 10% of current market 10%
land value
Chanhassen $235/unit 100 people/acre
Chaska 5% of raw land value 5%
Eagan $240/unit 10% Cash fee would change each year according to
the market value .
Land dedication would only be accepted if
in proposed park site plan.
Eden Prairie $275/unit Acreage according Land dedication would only be accepted if
to unit built in proposed park site plan. City buys
park land needed .
Prior Lake 10% of raw land 10%
value
Savage 10% of current market 10%
land value
Park Dedication Questionnaire (cont . ) Page 4
WHAT IS THE REQUIRED DEDICATION FOR:
Multiple Family -
City Cash Land Comments
Burnsville 10% of current market 10%
land value
Chanhassen Three or more dwelling units 100 people/acre
occupying independent floor
levels -
Efficiency = $63/unit
1 bdrm. = $80/unit
2 bdrm. = $143/unit
3 bdrm. = $190/unit
4 bdrm. = $230/unit
Chaska 5% of raw land value 5%
Eagan $150 - $200/unit 10% Land dedication would only be accepted if
it were in the proposed park site plan .
Eden Prairie $200/unit Land would not Land dedication would only be accepted if
be accepted in Park Development Plan and then based
upon, unit built not land value .
Prior Lake 10% of raw land value 10%
Savage 10% of current market land 10%
value
Park Dedication Questionnaire (cont . ) Page 5
WHAT WOULD BE THE REQUIRED PARK DEDICATION IN CASH/OR LAND FOR: Example #1
40 Acre plat with water & sewer
120 single family lots (11 ,000 sq. ft . average)
Assessors current market value - $4000/acre
Sale price of lots - $15 ,000 each
City Cash Land Comments
Burnsville 10% of current market 10% (4 acres)
land value ($16 ,000)
Chanhassen $235/unit ($28, 200) $235/unit x 120 I Land dedication would be on the equivalent
$4000 = 7 acres raw land value -
Chaska $6 ,000 ($3000/acre) 5% (2 acres) Would not be figured on the $4000/acre ;
I instead on a raw land value of $3000/acre
Eagan $240/unit ( $28 , 800) 10% (4acres) The 4 acres would not be enough for a neighbor-
hood park. Therefore, land dedication would
only be accepted if next to another plat
which could provide the needed additional
land for park or if the 4 acres were the only
available last park site within area .
Eden Prairie $275/unit ($33 ,000) 4-6 acres This formula is under change .
Prior Lake 10% ( $16 ,000) 10% (4 acres) A fee of $100/dwelling is charge at the time
of building permit issuance .
Savage 10% ($16 ,000) 10% (4 acres) Land would only be accepted if it were in the
City ' s Park Development Plan. A fee of
$100/dwelling would be charged at the time
of building permit issuance .
Park Dedication Questionnaire (cont . ) Page 6
WHAT WOULD BE THE REQUIRED PARK DEDICATION IN CASH/OR LAND FOR: Example #2
40 acre plat with no sewer and water
13 22 acre single family lots
Assessors current market value - $4000/acre
Sale price of lots - $20,000 each
City Cash Land Comments
Burnsville 10% ($4000) 10% (4 acres) Density has no variance .
Chanhassen $235/unit ($3 ,055) No land No platting is allowed in areas not having
accepted sewer and water.
Chaska $3000/acre ($6000) 5% (2 acres) Cash is figured on a straight $3000/acre which
is considered raw land value .
Eagan $240/unit ( $3120) 10% (4 acres) Platting would under current practice be
unapproved . If approved, cash in lieu of
would be $3 , 120 with the understanding that
when lots would be subdivided, additional
cash would be received at the current land
rate . Land dedication would be carefully
looked at , if even approved .
Eden Prairie $275/unit ($3 ,475) Little over Land dedication would not be accepted unless
2 acre land was very desirable such as shoreland
or scenic vista . This acreage would be
considered "reasonable" per City Ordinance .
Prior Lake 10% ( $400) 10% (4 acres) A $100/dwelling fee is also charged at the
time of building permit issuance .
Savage -0- -0- No platting is allowed in areas having no
sewer and water.
�W
• M
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
INCORPORATED 1870
129 E. FIRST AVE. 55379
yt
F
CERTIFICATE OF COLPLETION
TO: Common Council
City of Shakopee
Shalcop3e , I-Ann.
Date : October 30, 1978
Contractor: Northwest Bituminous
Completion Date : October 10, 1978
The above named contractor has completed a construction contract for:
Street Construction in Horizon Heights and Eaglewood
Contract dated June 12 , 1977
Wo-k comrr3nccd : June 20, 1977
GIlorIc corns-)leted : October 10, 1978
!ork ).ccnpted : October 17 , 1978
Init= contract est?.mate : $112 ,443 .28
Total cc,,tA :t complete in place
(incl. ci QnLe ox-ders ) : $127 , 530.87
Less withol-ling 0-/.:---
Lass prey .oL :=' ;,a.Sn-1er_t : $104, 365 .20 --
Charges and Deductions :
1'.IYT:!I�T�T r?ii; 'T`� T1. 18, 17 .34
\ �—.
•�nR T RITtlWN0115 CO., INC
n
i y Ln; i er — Contractor,/ y Ti11ts
c ZZ S 17O
Date
The Heart of Prc gress c, �' ey
1
i
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
HOLMES STREET AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING
Shakopee , Minnesota December 11 , 1978
The meeting was called to order at 7 : 10 PM by Chairman Ray
Siebenaler.
Attendance : August Dellwo, Jr. , James Groff , Fred Kerber, Ray
Siebenaler, Ron Weiler, William N . Wermerskirchen, Sr.
Wermerskirchen/Kerber moved to approve the minutes of November 27 ,
1978 , as kept . Motion carried .
The City Engineer reported that information on sanitary sewer
relining was not available .
The City Engineer noted that information requested by the Committee
was the content of a Feasibility Report , that Council must order
preparation of the Feasibility Report , that the Committee could
ask Council. to order preparation of the Feasibility Report to be
submitted to the Committee for review, informal public hearing and
recommendation to Council ; whereupon Council would establish final
project scope and assessment formula . Discussion followed.
Weiler/Wermerskirchen moved that Holmes Street Ad Hoc Committee
request that Council order a Feasibility Study of Holmes Street .
The scope of the study to include necessary street reconstruction,
curb, gutter and sidewalk construction, sanitary replacement or
renovation, water main construction and storm sewer construction.
The Committee further requests that the Feasibility Study be
delivered to the Committee for review and informal public hearing
after which the Committee would make final recommendations to
Council regarding the scope of the project and the method of
assessment .
Roll Call : Ayes - Dellwo, Groff , Kerber, Siebenaler, Weiler
Wermerskirchen
Noes - None Motion carried .
It was agreed that the next meeting would be called by the Chairman
to review preliminary reports on the Feasibility Report .
Groff/Weiler moved to adjorn. Motion carried .
Jon W. Erichson
Acting Secretary jiw
MEMO TO: Mayor & Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder , City Administrator
RE: 1979 Salaries
DATE: December 14, 1978
Attached are my recommendations for the 1979 salaries for all
city employees . Many of the salaries are already set by labor contracts ,
previous agreements or by the Recreation Board. In addition, we have
seven employees who are still on probation and will not get an increase
at this time . Of the 41 permanent city employees , you will only be
setting new salaries for eleven employees .
The salaries of those employees who are not exempt by the president ' s
7% guidelines do stay within the guidelines . The October to October
cost of living is 10. 2%.
In addition to the salary increases , I am recommending the following
changes in fringe benefits . These increases do not now fall under the
president ' s guidelines .
HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM
1 . City share for non union employees increase from $70 to $80
per month to cover expected increased costs
2 . City pay full cost of health insurance for department heads .
This will currently increase the city share by $30 per month
for these seven employees .
DSR/jsc
TABLE I .
NON EXEMPT EMPLOYEES
EMPLOYEE EVALUATION % INCREASE 1978 PROPOSED 1979
RECOMMENDED SALARY SALARY
Spurrier After 6 months -- $23, 500 $24, 500 after
probation
DuBois After 6 months -- 23, 500 On probation
Houser Superior 8 22 ,000 23, 760
Karkanen Superior 8 22 , 256 24,036
Voxland After 6 months -- 19,000 On probation
Engman Good 6 14, 800 15 , 688
Martin After 6 months -- 13,000 On probation
Cox Superior 8 12 ,000 12 ,960
Kirkpatrick Good 6 10,865 11 ,516
Knudson Good 6 10,502 11 , 132
Heinz Superior 8 10, 616 11 ,465
Witkowski After 6 months -- 9,193 On probation
TABLE II .
EXEMPT NON-UNION EMPLOYEES
EMPLOYEE EVALUATION %INCREASE 1978 PROPOSED 1979
RECOMMENDED SALARY SALARY
WILLEMSSEN Temporary -- $ 8, 320 $ 8, 320
ENGLER After 6 months -- 7 ,196 On probation
WOSTREL After 6 months -- 7 ,196 On probation
MOHRBACHER Good 7 8, 307 8, 888
COLLER 7 14, 980 16 ,000
ERICHSON Superior 24 12 , 500 15,500
/ .
TABLE III .
EXEMPT UNION EMPLOYEES
EMPLOYEE PERCENT INCREASE 1978 SALARY 1979 SALARY
Hanel -- $20, 328 No contract
Kaley -- 20, 328 No contract
Bisek 9 19,004 21 ,000
Anderson 9 18,240 19, 860
Carlson 9 17,160 19,068
Doyle 9 18,000 19,620
Lawrence 9 18,000 19,620
Nosbusch 9 17 ,160 19,068
Poole 9 17 ,497 19,620
Scherer 9 18,240 19, 860
Flynn -- 13,800 On probation
Fleck 16 16,800 19, 620
TABLE IV.
PUBLIC WORKS
EMPLOYEE PERCENT INCREASE 1978 SALARY 1979 SALARY
Pass 5 . 9 $15 ,808 $16 , 744
Cheever 7 .4 15 , 392 16 , 536
Heller 8. 6 15 , 122 16,432
Dircks 7 . 2 15 ,288 16, 390
Doege 7 . 2 15 ,288 16 , 390
Gelhaye 4. 7 14,893 15 ,600
Honermann 4. 7 14,893 15,600
Brinkhous 4. 7 14,893 15 , 600
Lureen 4. 7 14, 893 15, 600
Neisen 4. 7 14,893 15,600
TABLE V.
SHAKOPEE RECREATION BOARD EMPLOYEES
Muenchov, 10 21 ,186 23, 300
Walz 19 10, 500 12 ,500
Lewis 7 . 5 8,400 9,030
� 4 6L,
MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder , City Administrator
FROM: Nancy Engman , Administrative Assistant
RE: O' Dowd Lake
DATE : December 14, 1978
THIS YEAR' S PURCHASE:
The appraisal completed for the purchase of lake property on
O'Dowd in February of 1978 indicated a value of $139,500 for purchase
of the remaining three lots on the penninsula, and eight lots entering
along the main shoreline . I have attached excerpts from the appraisal
indicating these values .
The owners had agreed to hold the three lots on the penninsula
and seven lots on the mainland for sale to the City for $130,000;
provided, these values were supported by an appraisal .
It was my proposal to the owners that we amend the option agree-
ment and buy a single additional lot this year for the higher price and
reflect the credit of the additional $9, 500 to the third year ' s
purchase .
I recommend that the City pass Resolution 1344, Authorizing the
purchase of the eleven lots on O'Dowd Lake for $139, 500. The subsequent
action would be to pass a motion authorizing an amendment to* the option
agreement to reflect the adjustment .
This purchase involves approximately 1300 feet of shoreline and
approximately 7 .0 acres .
NEXT YEAR' S PURCHASE:
The City has been programmed for funding for a third year ' s
purchase on O'Dowd Lake . I have enclosed the letter indicating the
total amount programmed and the local share required for that funding.
The full application is due January 12th, and Resolution 1342 , and
1343 must be adopted and included in the application.
I have attached a copy of the 1979 Revisions to the "Action Plan"
that would be adopted through Resolution 1342 .
The City has been programmed for $125,000 worth of funding for
1979. The amendment to the option indicates that we may buy the
remaining six lots in the option for $115,500. I still feel we should
apply for the full amount of funding as :
O'Dowd Lake
December 14, 1978
Page -2-
a] we could possibly purchase an extra lot with the additional
money; and,
b] we do not know what values the appraisal will place on the
six lots and should be prepared to cover those values with the
grant funds
I recommend that the City adopt Resolution 1343 authorizing the filing
of an application for park acquisition with a total cost of $125,000.
I will outline the purchase as six lots ( I through N) , that the
owners have agreed to hold for us . We can amend the agreement prior to
next year ' s purchase to reflect lower costs or an additional lot if the
appraisal indicates this is possible . This purchase includes
approximately 900 feet of shoreline and 5. 56 acres .
The owners have asked me whether the City intends to continue
to purchase parkland after next year. I feel we should continue with
the application; however , I think we should request that they investigate
the possibility of donating portions of the property to the City to
cover part of the cost of the local matching share . The tax benefits
realized through donations could make this approach feasible .
NE/jsc
a
p11T[H1n RPPRR15RL5 111[. 4444 WEST 18TH ST., (1-494) MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55435 • PHONE 612-835-6531
February 10 , 1978
City of Shakopee
129 East 1st Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
RE: Residential Lakeshore
Property on O'Dowd Lake
Shakopee, Minnesota, as
revised to include only
11 lots
Gentlemen:
We have this date made, at your request, a revised appraisal of a
portion of the O' Dowd Lake property which was appraised by us for
the City of Shakopee on September 26 , 1977 . At this time the prop-
erty appraised contained 43 lots and 2 islands. This current
appraisal considers only 11 of the lots previously appraised, as
follows :
Lots A through H in RLS 47 , and Lots A, B, and O in RLS 45,
Scott County, Minnesota. This includes the portion of Lot
O which lies westerly of RLS #45 and which is shown in the
plat layout in this report.
Based on our inspection of the property and careful consideration of
the many factors influencing market value , it is our opinion that its
value, as of February 10 , 1978 , is the sum of $139 ,500 . 00
ONE HUNDRED THIRTY NINE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS
The undersigned, hereby certifies that he has inspected the property
and investigated all information believed to indicate the value ,
and that to the best of his knowledge and belief, the statements con-
tained in this appraisal are correct, subject to the limiting con-
ditions herein set forth; also this appraisal has been made in con-
formity with accepted professional standards.
Certified to this 10th day
of February, 1978
=rj. -PRAI AL
Howard Wagenhals, MAI-SREA
c /in, ' A.S.A.
Manager, Real Estate Appraisals Vice President
Senior Member, American
Society of Appraisers
7819 5
APPORTIONMENT OF TOTAL COMBINED VALUES
OF 11 LOTS IN RLS 45 & 47 BASED ON GROSS
SALES LESS COSTS AND EXPENSES
Indicated Discounted
Developed Developed Development Net Lot To Present
Value Value Cost & Value Before Lot
RLS 47 8-30-77 2-8-78 E & D Discount Values
Lot A $25 , 400 . $26 , 200 . $2 ,958 . $23 ,242 . $18 ,800 .
Lot B 15 , 700. 16 , 200 . 2 ,958 . 13, 242 . 10 ,700 .
Lot C 17 , 000 . 17 , 500 . 2 , 958 . 14 ,542 . 11,750 .
Lot D 17 , 100 . 17 , 700 . 2 , 958 . 14, 742 . 11,900 .
Lot E 16 , 400. 16 ,900 . 2 , 958 . 13,942 . 11,250 .
Lot ,F 15 , 000. 15 ,500 . 2 ,958 . 12 ,542 . 10 , 100 .
Lot G 17 , 800. 181400 . 2 ,958 . 15, 442. 12 , 500 .
Lot H 18 , 600 . 19 , 250 . 2 , 958 . 16 ,292 . 13,200 .
Totals
8
Lots ($143 , 000. ) ( $147, 650 . ) ($23, 664 . ) ($123, 986 . ) ($100 ,200. )
RLS45
Lot A $20, 000 . $20, 700 . $2 , 872 . $17 , 828 . $14 , 450 .
Lot B 16 , 000 . 16 , 500. 2 , 872 . 13,628 . 11,000 .
Lot O 19 , 400 . 20, 000 . 2 , 872 . 17 , 128 . 13, 850 .
Bbtals ($55 , 400. ) ($57 ,200 . ) ($8, 616 . ) ($48 , 584 . ) ($39 ,300. )
Totals
11
Lots $198 , 400 . $204 , 850 . $32 , 280 . $172 ,570. $139,500.
(100%) ( 103 .25%)
Indicated values of individual lots per discounted
cash flow analysis $139 ,500. 00
PATCHIN APPRAISALS. INC.
'+ OP'P'ICE OF' LOCAL AND URBAN AFP'AIRf3
MINNESOTA STATE PLANNING AGENCY • CAPITOL SQUARE BUILDING • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 65101 • PHONE (612)296.3091
LAV!CON/LCMR Grant Funding
For Park and Recreation Projects
Rural Town Center
KNIE, ADDRESS, & PHONE NO. OF PERSON REGION 11— COUNTY Scott
RESPONSIBLE FOR APPLICATION:
Walter Harbeck, Mayor SPONSOR'S NAME:
City }fall , 129 E. 1st. Ave. City of Shakopee
Shakopee, Minn. 55379
PROJECT NAME:
ACTION PERSON: (COORDINATOR) O'Dowd Lake
Nancy Engman
TITLE: Administrative .Assistant
ADDRESS: 129 E. First Ave. Shakopee, NIN.
ZIP: SS379� AfU -CUD-E-. 612 PHONE: 445-3650 (check)
PROGW 1ED LAWCON $ 64,000.00 PARAGRAPH (g) x
PROGWU El) LCHR $ 32,000.00 PARAGRAPH (h)
WORKSHOP MEETING DATE, TIME, & PLACE:
Metro (Morning)
PARTIAL FUNDING OR FULL FUNDING x (check)
PROGRAMMED PROGRAMMED
ESTIMATED LAWCON STATE LOCAL
LINE ITFJ-iS TOTAL COSTS ASSISTANCE ASSISTANCE SHARE
pCQ: S.67 Acres
DEV: N/A
SUB-TOTAL: 125,000.00
AUDIT: 3,000.00
GRAND TOTAL: 128,000.00 64,000.00 32,000.00 32,000.00
DEV. COSTT. ITEMS , QUANTITY, LENGTH, ETC. DOLLARS
TOTAL
:,-0. 0AY: x DEV, ONLY: ACQ. & DEV. :
AN EQUAL CPPORTUfOW T''y'f7COYER ,7;z s)
Appendix "F"
1979 Revisions
A. O'Dowd Lake
Land Acquisition
1979
5. 56 acres $125,000.00
E. City Expenditures for Municipal Parks & Recreational Facilities
1979 Estimated City Expenditures :
Swimming Pool 31 , 825 1979 Recreation Board
Municipal Parks 150,610 Expenditures : 89,201
<< CITY OF SHAKOPEE
`' slt t4 col 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
NMEMO
TO: Douglas Reeder, City Administrator
FROM:Bo_ Spurrier, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Engineering Department Staff Requirements
DATE: December 12 , 1978
Anticipating design work the City will perform during 1979 and in
the future , it is necessary to hire an Engineering Aide II as soon as
possible .
An Engineering Aide II would be a person with two years training
beyond high school at a vocational school or college in drafting,
roadway construction or civil engineering . Experience in drafting
would be considered in lieu of formal training.
Responsibilities would include office and field work. In the
office , the person wculd •make project drawings and maps and perform
some calculations . In the field the person would perform inspections
and other semitechnical work.
Starting salary for an Engineering Aide II should be $10,000 to
$13 ,000 annually .
It is estimated that 75-85 percent of the new employee ' s time
will be billed to projects .
MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder , City Administrator
FROM: Bo Spurrier , City Engineer
RE: Third Avenue Extension
DATE: December 14, 1978
Pursuant to the request of the City Council , I have asked
Mr. Jack Anderson, a traffic engineer, to comment on the effect of
extending Third Avenue through to CSAH 17 .
As the attached letter indicates , there would be no adverse
effect on CSAH 17 . Further, if traffic problems developed on Third
Avenue , additional stop signs would correct the problem.
In view of Mr. Anderson' s remarks , I would recommend that the cul-
de-sacs on the Furrie ' s 2nd Addition plat be deleted,that Third Avenue
be extended to CSAH 17 . The developers should construct all of Third
Avenue from CSAH 17 to existing pavement near Shawmut Street . This
would facilitate vacating Shawmut Street each side of Third Avenue .
HRS/jsc
AH Jack Anderson Associates
165 WTRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
ildwood Ave. White Bear Lake Minnesota 55110
12/12/78
EctiCEi`y��
fir Bo Spurrier, P.E. , City Engineer
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue tliY �r; ,��F.;� ►-+�
Shakopee, MN. , 55379
Re: Proposed extension of Third Avenue to C.S.A.H.
Dear Mr Spurrier,
Pursuant to our telephone conversation of yesterday, I have reviewed
my previous recommendations in my letter to Chet Harrison 10/5/77.
I can confirm my opinion that the extension of Third Ave would not
cause any unusual problems on C.S.A.H. 17.
It is not anticipated that traffic signals would ever be required
at the proposed Third Avenue intersection because of the limited
number of movements involved in a T intersection. However, if
signals proved necessary, the spacing is such that progression speeds
would be about 34 mph between T.H. 101 and Fourth Ave.
Additionally, favorable conditions would exist to handle large
volumes of turning and crossing movements at Fourth Avenue.
As much as possible, private driveway access in the area of this
new development should be oriented to proposed Third Avenue rather
than directly on to CSAH 17. This is recommended in the interest
of preserving the traffic carrying capability and safety of CSAH 17.
I would further recommend the installation of STOP signs on Third
Avenue in the residential area west of the proposed development
to encourage traffic to use Fourth Ave. The recommended signs
need not be erected right away pending development of undesireable
through traffic on Third Avenue. The City Council has the authority
to have the signs erected without fear of violating warrants.
Please call if you have additional questions.
Very truly yours,
?Jack ;d. Anderson, P.E.
• �,�• , 426-5777
t
December 14, 1976
MEMO TO DOUG REEDER
FROM GEORGE MUENCHOW
SUBJECT: PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD PARK AT 3RD & NAUMKEAG
1. This is not the first time that a resident from that block has
requested minimal neighborhood park facilities with emphasis on
the ice skating function. I can recollect at least two other
instances in the past 10 or so years.
2. At those times the callers were informed that if facilities of
this type would be constructed it would take place on the so
called city owned Gorman Street area now presently occupied by
the Police and Public Works Departments. City maps as recent
as 1974 refer to this area as Gorman Park, although to my
recollection it never was officially designated as such by the
City Council. The temporary athletic facilities that were housed
there (three softball fields and one baseball field) were constructed
in house and just happened over a period of time. Property for one
of the fields was leased from Gene Hauer.
3. The people that called at those times were told that the John P.
Wermerskirchen Hiawatha Park was serving as their neighborhood
park recognizing that that was too far a distance for pre-schoolers
to travel alone.
4. Philosophically, neighborhood parks should serve the residents
within a radius of - 1/3 wiles. Third and Naumkeag is a little
over j mile from Hiawatha Park.
5. My recommendation at this time is to deny the request on the basis
that the area is served by Hiawatha Park. Granted that the distance
is greater than the recommended norm, but yet in most situations in
life there are always those on either extreme that are not served the
same as those in the ideal middle.
6. I find it difficult to support the compromise of constructing a
neighborhood park in the re-development area being proposed near
Fourth & Market. This is awfully close to Hiawatha Park and would
in my opinion be improper usage of taxpayers money.
7. I have not had the opportunity to discuss this matter with Chuck
Riesenberg. The above is my own independent analysis.
CITY OF $
�Z 129 East First Avenue, Shako
pee, Minnesota 55379
,'C��. ���.• tip`/
MEMO
TO: _ Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator
FROM:_ Gregg M. Voxland, City Treasurer
SUBJECT: Purchase of Police Squads
DATE: December 19 , 1978
The tabulation of bids opened December 13 , 1978, is attached .
The Aspens exceed the specified wheelbase, bucket seats
specified are not available and limited slip differential
is not available with the standard axel ratio, which is --
desired by the Police Department . The Malibus cannot be
ordered keyed alike .
Malkerson' s bid of $20, 536 . 26 is $2 ,085 .24 higher than
Southside ' s bid of $18,451 .02 .
The Malibu is smaller on the outside and has more interior
room. Burnsville currently has Aspens and had Chrysler
products previously to this . They are satisfied with the
Aspen. Bloomington currently has Novas and also tried two
Volares (basically the same as Aspen) and reported unsatisfactory
maintenance experience with the Chrysler projects .
Therefore , it appears to me that the Malibu is a better
vehicle for the City of Shakopee , but there is a large price
difference ($2 ,085 .24) . If the Council were to reject all
bids submitted, it is possible to buy under the Hennepin
County contract . The cost for three squads (Malibus) under
this procedure would be $18 , 864 .00. It appears that buying
through Hennepin County would best serve the interests of the
City .
GMV/jiw
Attachments
I
I
O�
-3- bID TABULATION SHEET CITY OF SHAKOPEE DECEMBER 13 , 1978
3 POLICE SQUADS 10:00 A.M.
NAME South Side Malkerson
Dodge Motors
MAKE Dodge Chevrolet
Aspen Malibu
DELIVERY 60/90 days 90/120 days
NET BID
(no trade) $18 ,451 .02 $20, 536 . 26
ALTERNATE UID
(trade-in) ------ $19 ,336 .26
Wheel Base
DEVIATIONS 112 . 711 Not keyed alike
Bucket Seats
N/A
Limited Slip
Diff ..
l
s
Hennepin County Contract 8318
Iten Chevrolet award bid for mid-size police patrol sedans
Base Bid $5938
Option positraction 26
R.H. mirror 8
Bucket seats 105
350 V-8 163
2 white doors 48
$6288 each
$18 , 864 for total
NOTE : Alternate engine may be somewhat less and bucket
seats may be $5 less if unable to obtain cloth seats.
Malkerson $20, 536 . 26
Southside 185451 .02
Hennepin
County 18,864 .00
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
MEMO
TO: _ Mayor and City _Council
FROM: Douglas S . Reeder, City. Administrator
SUBJECT: DeGross Claire
DATE: December 7 , 1978
In accordance with the attached agreement , the three
appraisers -met and submitted damage estimates as follows :
Patchin Appraisals - $12 ,800
Wiley Appraisals - 4,000
Sharkey Appraisals - 3,000
In accordance with the agreement , the City must pay
$6 ,000. This is a totally unjustified award and based totally
on the basis that the City had some responsibility for the
seven inch ( 7") rain storm and the position of the dirt on
the lot .
If it were not for the agreement , I would recommend that
we deny any payment and allow the court system to decide .
However, we did enter into the agreement .
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the
payment of $6 ,000 to Agnes DeGross in accordance with our agree-
ment and also authorize payment of the three appraisers used
in the process . Their bills have not yet been submitted .
Funds will have to come from the Contingency Fund .
DSR/jiw
Attachment : Agreement
cc : Rod Krass , Assistant City Attorney
Julius A. Coller , I1 , City Attorney
AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, J. & R. Construction, Inc. , has filed a claim against the City of
Shakopee for damages it claims to have sustained as the result of certain alleged
errors on the part of the City of Shakopee and its agents and employees in
connection with the erection of a dwelling on
Lot 2, Block 7, Minnesota Valley First Addition to the City of Shakopee; and
WHFRFAS, the claims as made are both substantial and serious, but in the main
they are -all denied and disputed by the City of Shakopee; and
WHEREAS, several conferences have been held between the claimant, its agents
and representatives and the: City of Shakopee, its officials and employees, and it
became obvious that the best interests of all parties would best be served by
compromising and settling the above matter on an amicable basis , but the claimant
and the City have been unable to arrive at any damage figure;
THEREFORE, THIS AGREEMENT IS MADE AND ENTERED INTO BY AND BETWEEN THE SAID
CLAIMANT, J. & R. Construction, Inc. , hereinafter referred to as the Claimant, and
the City of Shakopee, hereinafter referred to as the City, as follows :
1. The Claimant hereby agrees to name arid appoint an appraiser within ten (10)
days of the signing of this agreement to determine to what extent, if any, the above
mentioned house has been devalued for the alleged reason that the elevation of the
dwelling was improperly set by the City.
2. The City hereby agrees to appoint an appriser within a like period of time
to determine to what extent, if any, the above mentioned house as been devalued for the
alleged reason that the elevation of the dwelling was improperly set by the City.
3. IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties hereto that the two
appraisers referred to above will forthwith consult with themselves and name and
appoint a third appraiser. The three appraisers will then meet and hear the
presentation of both parties , and shall then immediately and individually, in writing,
set the figure they believe said property has been devalued, if it has been, by
virtue of the foregoing described situation. The actual damage figure to be awarded,
if any, shall be the average of the two closest individual damage figures.
4. The City agrees to accept as binding upon it the monetary amount, if cany, so
determined and to forthwith pay said amount to the Claimant as a full and :-'
n
naymant of any and all claims of the claimant against the City of Sahkopee that it
now has or might subsequently arise out of or by virtue of the above referred to
incident.
5. The City further agrees to pay the fees and proper expenses of the three
appraisers.
6. The Claimant for itself, its successors and assigns, agrees to accept as
binding upon it, its successors and assigns , the monetary amount, if any, so deter-
mined; and to accept the same in full and final payment of any and all claims it or
its succ ors and assigns have or might have now or in the future against the City
arising out of or by virtue of the above referred to situation.
7. IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties hereto that each party
waives any and all right of appeal from the determination of the appraisers.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands this
l �
3day of 1978.
J. & R. CONSTRUCTION, INC.
BY: At
- �
� II
Authorized Offcer
THf_ CITY OF SHAKOPEE
BY —
Its Mayor
BY:-
Its City Administra":'V
CITY OF SHAKOPEE ,
i 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
MEMO
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator
SUBJECT: DeGresg C1 ni m 7
DATE: December 14, 1978
The appraisers fees for the process used to determine
the damages to the DeGross house are as follows :
Sharkey Appraisal Services $ 300.00
Wiley Appraisal , Inc . 350.00
Patchin Appraisals _512 .50
$1162 . 50
It is recommended that the City Council approve payment
of these bills from the Contingency Fund.
DSR/jiw
� ;, oFeENa; CITY OF SHAKOPEE
1 \� 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
J Y./
MEMO
TO: _ Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator
SUBJECT.Proposed Sale of Land
DATE: December 7 , 1978
Halo Investment has requested the sale of a 50 foot
strip of land now owned by the City of Shakopee as indicated
on the attached map.
This land is not in the flood plain and could be used
by the developers to expand the three lots which they now
are considering. This land would also abut Bluff Avenue if
it were ever extended and thus would give the City someone
to assess for that construction.
The February 1977 appraisal of the adjoining property
for the City found a value of 42¢ per square foot for
similar property in the back with no road access . If you
appreciated the payment by 10% for each of the two years to up
date the value this would show a value of 51¢ per square foot .
This would indicate a value of $13 , 132 .50 for this strip,
assuming that the area is accurately figured. Before the sale ,
we would require the survey required of the plat .
It is my recommendation that it is in the best interest
of the City to sell this property at this time for the following
reasons :
1 . The City has no use for the property . This
would not cut off our access to the river area .
2 . If we built Bluff Avenue to the east , this would
give us someone to assess.
3 . By allowing the expansion of the lots as proposed,
they become more buildable and, therefore , should
bring in more tax dollars.
DSR/jiw
Attachment
,I
IVI l)Iv
. .. ..............................
f-------------------T-
------ ---,---- I -
Jut / • sue (
0
1 r 1
VIP
v: NL
I 4
��ezt- ; <
dw
� s 1
• T •�•,rte, :•►�•' .-• • • • 1 `• • • •/' � 4 • •r• •�. • \ — \ �—-- - -`' ----j-- -—
y
�� __ pSf.SO / ` '�•' •�•,>M vSglJ{ �, •. ee�/��� /( >j"x )
ct
� l
• �- •���......�.;?0.111 SB� \ .- -- M Q ZQ11�5 � � �- 62.091 \. 1 I i � j�� � �/ �i ( I _ I
�-/" �-��„ �_=-�.'.-„' — --�' — '` �`_ —— _, �t s�`)'�•ss a `\ \ I I I I I III —•— eu— � ��__�, t / �Ilk
11 sot` - \�I\•. ;`l �\ ,� 11!I� �--. I / i.
•is 9u
?vb7
— 115161 M_00.Z0.2B
-�2'/d PA•',7 0,77 t hid
0 0/'71 ?P"407 0`10
,2. VZM V—r �e V -7
i L •
147t• L I I Y OF bHAIPUPLE CHECK REGISTER 12 14 19 PAGF 1
LNtCh IV''. UAtE AM!1UN1 vFrvDUR I_IEM UESCRIPIION ALCUUNT NU. INV. N F.U. q MESSAGE
ll5v/6 to/14/70 5.31 LY S STANUARD 348093-- -- --01-4340-321-32 —
tl3ule it/14/7n 5.31- CY S STANUAHD 34.8093 01-4390-321-32
.00
— -----
****# ***-LK5
S4",iu3 1c/1a/la 41.17 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY GtNERAL SUPPLIES 01-4220-421-42
Sam(,n5 It/14/7t 2.88 AU 10 CENTRAL SUPPLY GtNERAL SUPPLIES 01-422n-441-44
.14!'v o.5 12/14/78 _ 30.46 AUIU CENTRAL SUPPLY EwU1P. MAINT. 01-4230-321-32
i4tt4l%s 11114178 28.07 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY EWUIP. MAINT, 01-4230-421-42
lyu�r.5 1ol/14178 18.35 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-141-t4
uriv! s to/14/78 _4.38 AUTO LENtRAL SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-311-31 J
140.41 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-411-42 — --
34MUO5 1c/14/7b 10514.00 AU10 CENTP.AL SUPPLY CAPITAL FWUIP. 01-4511-441-44
1 780 e? * _
**w•(;KS
34t• tc/14/lt 20.00 AIRLUMM CUMM.SYST.MAINT. 01-4233-311-31 26b75
20.00
�4hpP! 12/14/7b 62.40 A.8.0ILK PHODULTS EWUIP.MAINT. 01-4230-311-31 53690
* * �.
•+*-LKS
346ufs 121140b 24.47 UENNIS ANDERSON THAVEL EXPENSE 01-4330-311-31
24.47
****#
w*w-(,KJ
348114 (2/1u/lb I.1S3.e0 ASSULIATEO ASPHALT PHTLHIN6 MAILS. 01-4?41-417-42 262
1 .153.20 *
4NUcU 1c/in/76 351.99 AMERICAN GIST. CU, GtNERAL SUPPLIES 01-4220-311-31 e436t
- - - .-_ __ _--------- ---------- 557.99 *
j4µ4r� __--11/14/7tf 9.09 A K M INUUS.TRACIUR GLNLRAL SUPPLIES 01-4220-441-44 b4388 --_ ------
4hur'r 12114i7o 82.111 A R M INDL13. IRACTUH EWHIP. MAINT. 01-4250-62t-62 b405ts
91.23 * —- - - ------- -------
#*##*#
***-LKS
X114116 13U.J7 ----- nAPTLPY i-HSE. SERV. VEHICLE MAINT. --- 01-42.32-421-42 69292 -
C 1Su.u7 •
***-LKS
34H-u_Z .— to/lil/7t 3.494.29 bAwRt!'S LI1-F. ktMIT-µL 91-4925-911-91__
t 10 it 1:r Z)O�K�J't t. 0-trr, Ott I OLH 18 14 IM PAGE 2
[LhtLh wIt. U A%It Ai.,IlUN1 vtwouw Ilk" UtUNIPION ACCOUNT Nu. INV. s F.U. 0 MtSbA6t
s4klt;4U lel14l7h ukYArd A6uktGATtS WUAU MILS. 01-4240-40-40
34 m u it it le/14/7o 74.01 okYAN A(-UkL6ATtS PATLHIN6 IYOLS. 01-4241-4e7-4e
48641 Ite 4 7 ti 16.90 oRYAO KULK PPIDUULT5 RUAU MTLS, 01-Q240-4e7-4e
1145 e9j's9.e0 tcOv w. bal(tR O)Htk PhOP.SENVICtS 01-4315-341-34
Ad 1459,deo
34flut,j o.04 LOA3L_I" CUAST G&-NtRAL
�4bfobj le/14/lb 3.3h IWASI ILI CUAST MiSCELLANLOUS 01-4990-121-1e
4b461 1g,11417b 6,16 LOAST 70 CUAST MASLELLANtOUS 01-4990-311-31
4blih 1 1e/14/76 16,64 LOASI W CUA§T MISCELLANEOUS ni-4990-331-33
3e.UO
4d0ti-4 14/14/70 b. 10 LLAYS I'HiNIING PKT6, 8 RLPHO. 01-4351-311-31 1006
6.10
-LK Z)
�
4eOlt le/14/lb 19360.29- LARGILL INC, PATCHINU MTLS. 01-4241-432-4d
,
4MV7/ le/14/16 1,46b.29 LANGILL INC, PAILMIN6 MTLS. 01-4241-432-49
48o11 12/14/76 1.360.24 CANGILL INC. ILE CUNTROL MTLS 01-4244-432-42
du/1f le/14/78 130.0 LLUTLH & U-JUINT VtHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-4el-4d 17t78
**A-LKZ
le/L4/7o 11.45 WONALD CAkLSUN I"AvEL tXPEN$t 01-4330-311-31
11.4s
***-LKS
3 e ttjo L) UNNr LO, S i Gh 8 0 1!!4?!2 0 n4 4e
.1 L
3e.uo
341t)W4 3 1e/14/1M ?v.sh UUivNjN6 S hok-E. Gr-NLRAL SUPPLIES 01-42[0-141-14d
b S4tl'l=jfb ! - --- -- — ----]
.48 UUI%NIN6 5 hOoE. GLNtkAL SUPPLIEb 01-4220-bel-be
34b11-J$ le/14/lt 25.tl5 UUNNiN6 5 mDaE. EZiUIP,MAINT. 01-4250• e1�3e
1-4
1978 LI IY III ,r 0'i vtF LLECK REGISTER 1? 14 18 F•AuE 3
IL MECI f4h. LA It AmQUNI VENOUR ITEM UESCRIPTION ACCUUNT NU. INV. a P.U. a MtaSabF —I
--- ---- ------- - ---
348ii4j` ---- IC/l4/)n---- ----?U.SFI� — UUwN1NG S HIIIrE. VEHICLE MAI1�11.-------- ----01-4251.121-12
34HkoQ3 le/14/74 5.31 UUNN1NG S HOWE. CONFERENCE & SCHOULS 01-4390-321-32
52.47 *
-- - - --
***-LK3
348U48 11/14/78 47.56 IEHERENCt UOYLE GENHAL SIIPPLIS 01-41220-311-31
41.5h
***** ***-LKS
418_121 _— 12/14/78 15.98 EASTMAN 'DRUG CUNFERENCE ri S[HUUL- 01-439_0_-32_1-32 _
3uF+121 tr/14i7r 3.56 EASTMAN DRUG M SLELLANE.OUS 01-4990-311-31
19.54
4F11?r 1211Q/7n 11010 NANCY ENGMAN THAVEL EXPFNSt 01-4330-121-12
11.10
***-LKS
3481?,h 12/14/7b 82,00 ES5 BRUS GENERAL SUPPLIES 01-4220-451-45 3491
92.00
**-LKS —---
348151 le/14/78 ?7.67_ EAkL FLECK TRAVEL LXPFNSE 01-4330-211-21
27.62
****. ***-LKS
Sa�+iSl 12/lill7o 964.bo --—FLEXIBLE PIPE. IUUL GENERAL SUPPLIES 71-4220-911+91
964.b0 *
4815a ie%4/78 114.00 FIRE INST. ASSN. CUNFEkEr4CE & SCHOUL 01-4390-321.32 4338
--- -- - -�- 114.00 * -- ------ ------.— _------------- —.. _
— *i*-LKS
3481P1 11/1 i1/76 ?b.00 b b H SANITATTUN TKASM PICK UP 01-4373-628-62
***** ***-L'KS
30145 lell&178 046.0n 6fIPHER STATE TRUCK VEHICLE PAINT. 01-4232-421-42 10959
I -
we.bf)
**- KS
34911'+ to/14i7tr lu.Un HhJ-J h-S '-KELLY VCHICLE MAIHT. 01-4232-311-;l
3492� 1 it/111/78 IC.50 HFNWd N-S SKFLLY VEHICLE MA1,47. 111-4232-41.1-42
349?.111 -11/lui-7r+ ---- -----I1.bo — rlt,jNtk-S SKFLIY VEHICLE r•AiwT, n1-423?-hel-tie_--
;u.u0
•
4F4 fr•y Ie/i1+//n All.Ui1 - - FENNY hFiftP OTHER PPf'F.bEKV1CLS OI-4315-141-14
IS 7 b L I y Olt tqEuj rtk
___�! 4
L mt ..10. ist.It Ao0UN 1 1104 Ut8Cr(j) 110ij ALCUUNT NU. LiV. w P.U. 6 MLSbAkok
***-LKS
34t)e 3 3 le/14/76 75.50 tiUuSt OF PRINT GLNLRAL SUPPLIES 01-4220-331-34
3 4 to,!l 1c/.L 0 1 b 2U.4n HOuSt OF FmINT PkN16. Y HEIiRQ. 000
314b,:_i3 le/14/Its 2U.90- HOUSE OF PRINT PKNIG. kEFRU. 0I-435I-151-15
34de3.) . 1ell'i'Fiv eu.,#I) hOuSt. uP PRINT P"N16. 16 KEPHU. 01-4351-151-15
q —EPRO, Al-a35 I-jUmj�1.JAQ
48e;;- 1c/140ts 20.90 HUUSk UF PKINT PKNIG, 16 KFPRU, 01-4351-411-41 4760
Obvio
***-LKb
t)-46 HANK ULNEWAL SUPPLIES 0 1-42,20-bg�-&,3
—
5.46 Ok
34be54 I e I 141 f b 10 u u o IL)b 1.11-t INS. RtMIT-IUS d1-49e7-911-91
***-LKS
34be91 le/140b e3v.o0 „BASS & MANAmAN LLGAL SERVICES 01-4310-11:11-1
s4t,e,-�i 1,:/t4/ 70 55.00 KRASb & MANAhAN LLGAL SERVICES 01-4310-163-1:
es tj.U_q_
e%1,: le/14/10 45.70 KULHNEh-S SIANOAKE) MUTUW FUELS 01-4222-511-31
4x y le/14/Its 15.43 KULHNLN-5 3TANUAND VtHICLEMAJNJ , 01-02S2-311-31
3 4 M c I /1 J, It, 41.50 MILHA14U AALEY kill,I t UNM 01-4223-311-31
to/l4/Iv o7e.42 LOUIS ESP LuIJ1P.RLN1AL 01-4364-151-15
old.42
i u LAIHK('-P' PUNI 5UPPLY (;LI`JkNiL 5UPioLika 01-4220-oel-64 5344d
•....k ***-LKb
lure"a -.. . 461.1 +.) m! t L A4 1 im- UK _L9 j-q2_e?-,4e1.-48 .45o21
t�� yt - ----- 0
14
,7..I
I
197n L I I Y Ilf '►HAIWItE LHLCK HEGISTLR 12 14 18 PAuE 5
C�tCn 1+U. UAfk AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM UESCkIPTIEIN ALCUUNT NU. IAV. a P.U. a MESSAGE _
L— — -49-! --- — ----- --- - - i
34bsti1 ie/l4/Ib 3.58 MUIUH PARTS G NERAL SUPPLIES 01-4220-Y21
3ut'351 Ie/l4/7b 13.90 MOIOH PAk73 GENERAL SUPPLIES 01-4220-441-44
3ab351 14/14/70 4.26 MIIIOk PARTS VLHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-141-14
413 b151 le/14/78 21.138 MOTOR PARTS VLHICLE MAINT, 01-4232-421-42
�4ti551 le/14/7N 1*77 MOTOR PARTS VEMICLE MAINT• 01-4232-6?1-62
45,39 •
348i52 12/14/71+ 54.x0 MINNEGASLO NATL.GAS. 01-4371-181-18
341+3`,.: I2/1,4/7e 96.00 MINNEGASLO NMTL.GAS. 01-4371-182-18
4r.35e to/14/78 - - 279.58 MINNEGASCO N TL.GAS. 01-4371-311-3
i 4835e- 12/14/78 559.17 MINNEGASCO NATL.GAS. 01-4371-421-42
4635c le/14/76 113.13. MINNEGASCO NATL.GAS. 01-4371-611-61
14N.5 tit lc:/lu/Iti 33.4? MINNEGASLO NATL.GAS. 01-4 71-6e2-62
1.136.10
*#*#• ***-MKS
x8355 12/14/76 25.00 M. SAFETY CUUNCIL DUES 01-4391-421-42
uRStu le/14/18 70.00 MILAN. POLLUTION CON, CUNFERENCt 8 SCrHOUL 01-4390-421-42 1I
70.00 *- — -- - - ---- - ------1
•##... ***-LKS
I
4NSe+.i le/1f1/7b 35.36 MPLS. STAR PHN1G. 8 HEPRU. 01-4351-6el-62 317197
35.36
34ti,h5 le/14//b 3,123.60 MINN. VALLEY• SURF. RUAU LONSTRUCTIUN 55-4514-911-91
30123.60
�***** ***-LKS
3uN371 12/lit/Ia 5.00 mAMA DUE 01-4391-lel-12
b.u()
#*##• ***-CKS
Sur >• 1 le/14/lb 3.u0u.U0 IaR1.vHL.f-aRUEF�.LEN, GtNtRAL SUPPLIES 01-4J_20-656-65
3.uou.00
***-LKS
34it3r3 _—tlilu<Its 152.00 wM.MUELI,E,R 8_SUN$ PATLHIIIG MTLS+ __- DI-4241-427-42
�34P3..,� Ie/l��/Its u75.e0 W-V ✓t1.L It( 011014 01-4321-121-12
i's i;shr, 1e/la/7a 34.01 EtL TLI tPtil_IIjE
. -
.^
^ '
�/ / V ''�-: '�^`.,' f--� LHtCK RE61bTER 1214-18_-PA
,^/I- ^*/m"/ vFn»ua I!sn osoc°zr,Inw ucouo"r ou" x°v. * P.U. * mtmoMA !
I el 46.53 ILI[ hisvp
J^ /"/w//° .511.19 ;h~ *tL L 7EU"no^e 01~*321~311~31
3 o .3
^^^^^° ^^*~LKb
Itt K 3---]
»^««`o ,d//o//* 1.69 pAwu p/LppHnpp mLwEpAL ouppLIam 01~*220~411~wt 659ne
| ` i
w^" e Po.00 *^woLo p^nu wwcmIwcH, nLw,xL 01~4302~656~65 /
�
`~^^' ' .", .`,'" 1.28 "'.`` ~°"^~="" �
30!"11 le/14/78 54e.b I SULL PUSPILSb GENERAL SUPPLIES 01-4220-141-14
`
aok./^ /e//^//° u,»» uxxxuptE Luwncx GtwEp^L oopPLIo uubl
p.x^/, 1 e/1*/1* /�I.ts b^xpupLF VALLEY rum" LLnwL wuTIcso o1~4u5o~tax~te |
�y"�7�-_ �_-1x1L��Iv ��x� aHAyuP tL_V&l��Y �Uo^ �' �� �-x��u^__--_ -- y�c4�����t�0�-_- �� _ ' �� _ �__'_�— �l
i"+/" 1 1"~ /" vp^"op0 vmLLs, puu. LLa"L w»/ots 51~4350~911~q/
~ /44.4p ^ '
14
^°^" /e//« 5 x/uI / c,v.upLpo cuw^..oYu/..»1w,., 01~4235~311~31
* j 14'^^" Jlo,/s bLo,/ L/1l,u*t*/p+ cUw°.arx,.*xIw,. 01~4233~3ax~32 |
1971% LT Iv uF L)HaKU�-tF LHtCK HE61STLP 12 14 18 PAGE 7
tr.r, UAIL AHOUNI VENOUR I!EM UESCRIPTION ALCUUNT NU, Iry V. 0 P.U. N MESSAGE _
y.lHithl - '-- 12 7l4 7 lh ---'1 .425.60 --- -I-SHAKUPtE F1Rt UE1'T, ---- SALAk P.I. - 01-413a•32i-52--- --------
1.925.60
aNut�4 12/14/76 24.10 STARK-S LLLANING BLD66 MAINT.. 01-4231-181-1$ _
3 4/111/16 16.30 STAPK-S CLLAw1NG SLUG. MAINT. 01-4 31-18 •1�
iubo# u 12/14/7r 11.00 STARK-S CLEANING BLDG, MAINT. 01-4231-311-;1
34F'ux4 1c/lu/lh 13.00 STARK-5 LLEANING BLOC. MAINT. 01-4231-421-42
75.40
LV41o5 _ td/14/76 438.03 SPUC ELECTRICITY 01-4370-181-18 _
3uNu. S tc/l4/76 85.21 SPUC ELELTkILITY 01-4310-18 -18 -
34K1IH5 12/14/7!+ 147.73 SPUC ELECTkILITY 01-4310-311-31
34)•1:1'5 12/1Q/7t± 100.33 SPuc ELECTRICITY 01-4370-321-32
4ttu4 12/14/7a 295,47 SPuC ELECTRICITY 01-4370-421-42 I1I
uyux5 12/111/78 229.04 SPUC ELECTRICITY 01-4370-427-42 - 1
uHURS _12/14/78 81.69 SPUC ELECTRICITY 01-4370-611-61 Jl
SwNaKS - )�/14/lri 35.15 SPUC ELELTkICI1Y 01-4370-622-62 --
iafr4H5 14/14/7tl 45.25 SPUC ELECTkILITY 01-4370-625-62
348 uh5 1r/l4/78 93.35 SPUC ELECTkILITY 01-4370-628-62
1.551.76
+,w*** *�►*-CKS
3411444 12/lu/7a 39.00 ST, F-RANLIS HOSPITAL HLOOD TESTS 01-4425-311-31
39.00
;)16441 !d/1U/7b 124.00 SCHRUEUFH MFG, GLNRAL SUPPLIES 01-4220-421-42 1198
SaNuv1 1c/14/76 31.08 SChRUEVER MFG. EWU1P. MAINT. 01-4230-421-42 119A
lc/14/76 13.15 SHAKUPEE HUNS. GtNERAL SUPPLIES 01-4220-421-42
r31ru�e lc/1/1/70 11.50 SHAKUPLE HUWt. GtNERAL SUPPLIES 01-4220-621-62
�i4f+a9i It/14/7A 12088 SHAKUPLE HUNt. MISLELLANEUUS 01-4990-311-31
- - - ----------- ----
31.53
***-LKS
3uru9c 12/14/78 21.10 SIGNAL SYSTEMS IWC. GtNERAL SUPPLIES 01-4220-153-15 b5420
21,70 «
t _
3� ."t:yr - 1r/lu//t+ 56.65 �SHAKUPLE FURU J VLH1CLE MAINT, ^�01-4232-321-32 66716
34t•v4r 1c/1'�/1� 11.75 SHAKUPEE FURu VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-6et-62 47730
7U.b0
****. ***-LKS
t4°U-`4'+ -- --- 1c/lu/ lr ---------------12.40 SCUTI LTY. CCM.Stkv. ---PhNIG. 8 HVPRU. -- - X11-4351-1ST-15---
12.40
- 4,404.33 - ---STNrdi�A41 011_ mulUR FUELS nt-u22?.-911-91 lJo8U
u,t�Ua.33 +
+.►►►. - ***-LK6
f �
LL!
19 Its L_IIY sir $HAVLIFCE CHECK NE6TSTLR 12 14 78 PAuE A
LHECK Nn. ualIk AIAOUNI VENDUR IIEH DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NU. INV, 0 V.U. K MESSAGE
1ur ,sc--- it/14/7K 29.80 VALLEY IhD.PkONAr�E GtNtRAL SUPPLIES 01-4220-421-42
29.80
!I5b2_•_____ 12/14/70 111.424 _VIKING SCEEI DINE—AL SUPPLIB __01-4220�451+45 9
47.24
•t,�+CKy
48511 12/14/78 10.15 r10UDLAKE SANITATION TRASH PICK UP 01-4373-181-18
°.-I I( 12/14/78 3602 PQUDLAKE SANITATION TkASH PICK UP 01-4373-1312+18
3,4#4 711 12/14/76 2.6.68 wUUOLAKE SANITATION TRASH PICK UP 01-4373-311-31
3ur3511 12114/7b 15.13 V+UUDLAKE SANITATION TRASH PICK UP 01-4373-321-32
X40 li _ J2/Iu/7d 26.08 NOUDLAKE SANITATION TRASH PICK UP 01-4373-421.42
5 4h�1 t it/14/76 ,46.88 hnUDLAKE SANITATION TRASH PICK UP 01-4373-622-62
+#4571 12/14/id 60.423.70 wpUDLAKE 8ANITATION TkASH PICK UP 01-4313-711-71
6.540_64
#.•R t
*+*-LKS
r ahn1 12/14/7d 41.30 ZEP MFG. ' GtNERAL SUPPLIES 01-4220-441-44 29675
_
-- 41.50 * —--- — -- —
...... ***-LKS
13.935.40 FUND 01 TOTAL
14.27 FUND 51 101AL
34123.60 FUND SS TOIAL
964.60 FUND 71 TOTAL
- - ---- — --3.'594.29 FUND 81 TOTAL — ----- _ —— - ------- —----
41.b32.i4 TOTAL
DEBIT ACCOUNT CREDIT ACCOUNT AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR CHECK AMT. CHECK #`
December 19, 1978 Bills to Council
01 .4330.311 . 31 01 . 1010.000.00 82 .00 Travel Expense Americanna Ventures , Inc . 82 .00
01 .4220.153 .15 " " 10.00 General Supplies American Press 10.00
01 .4990.411 .41 " " 29 .00 Miscellaneous Assurance Glass Co. 29 .00
01 .4391 .411 .41 " " 100.00 Dues Am.Water Work Assn. 100.00
01 .4390.321 . 32 " " 8 . 79 School & Conf . Blumgerg Photo Sound Co . 8 .79
01 .4330. 121 .12 " " 4.50 Travel Expense Judy Cox 4.50
01 .4380. 911 . 91 " " 825 .00 Land Rental Chgo .Milwaukee,St .Paul & 825 .00
Pacific RR
01 .4232 .421 .42 " " 73 .50 Vehicle Mainc . Doddway Frame 73 . 50
01 .4232 .621 .62 " " 22 .50 Vehicle Maint . Gopher Glass Co . 22 .50
01 .4390.121 .12 " " 35 .00 Conference Govt . Trng. Service 35 .00
01 .4230.621 .62 " " 10.51 Equip . Maint . International Harvester 10.51
01 .4391 . 141 .14 " " 45 .00 Dues Intl .Assoc .Assessing Ofcs . 45 .00
01 .4314. 171 . 17 " " 973 .00 Planning Isberg,Riesenberg 973 .00
01 .4312 .411 .41 " " 275 .95 Engr .Services Instant Testing 275 .95
01 .4232 . 321 . 32 " " 396 .30 Vehicle Maint . Kennedy Transmission 396 . 30
01 .4220.181 . 18 " " 129 .60 General Supplies Ed Leaveck 129 . 60
01 .4519 .631 .62 " " 208 .20 Other Improvement Mn. Valley Fence 208 . 20
01 .4224.421 .42 " " 51 .34 Safety Supplies George Mulholland Co . 51 .34
01 .4230.311 . 31 " " 100.00 Equip .Maint . Mn.Dept .of Public Safety 100.00
01 .4391 .141 .14 " " 75 .00 Dues N.A. I . F.A. 75 .00
DC-BIT 'ACCOUNT CREDIT ACCOUNT AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR CHECK AMT. CHECK ;"
December 19, 1978 Bills (Page 2 )
55 .4517 .911 .91 55 .1010.000.00 80,809 . 72 Watermain Constr . Orfei & Sons, Inc . 80,809 .72
01 .4220. 311 .31 01 .1010.000 .00 47 . 32 General Supplies Office Electronics 47 .32
01 .4243 .622 .62 it " 23 . 75 Grounds Maint .Mtls . Pioneer Hi-Bred 23 . 75
01 .4391 .121 .12 if " 7 .00 Subscription Prior Lake American 7 .00
01 .4330.111 .11 " " 40.66 Travel Expense Radisson South 40.66
01 .4220.121 .12 " " 23 . 75 General Supplies Rich/Lynn Corp. 23 . 75
71 .4382 .911 .91 71 . 1010.000.00 195 .00 Machinery Rental Ryback Digging & Trenching 195 .00
01 .4512 . 141 .14 01 . 1010.900.00 242 .00 Capital-Ofc .Equip . Riverside Office Products 242 .00
01 .4231 . 181 .18 " " 167 .40 B1dg.Mainc . Ries Heating 577 .44
01 .4231 .311 . 31 " " 90.00
01 .4231 . 321 .32 " " 73 . 80
01 .4231 .421 .42 " " 144 .00 "
01 .4230.321 . 32 " " 102 .24 Equip . Mainc .
01 .4250.427 .42 " " 546 .00 Striping Mtls . Traffic Marking Services 546 .00
01 .4315 .653 .65 !' " 2 ,265 . 20 Other Prof .Service Trio Tree Services 2 ,265 .20
01 .4390.411 .41 " " 30 .00 Conference U of Minn. 30.00
01 .4390. 141 .14 " " 35 .00 Schools U of Minn . 35.00
01 .4220. 711 . 71 " " 112 .00 General Supplies Water Products Co . 112 .00
01 .4330. 121 .12 " " 13 .95 Travel Expense Jane Wostrel 13 . 95
1
88,423 .98 88,423 .98
FUND TOTALS
01 General Fund = 7 ,419 .26
55 ' 78 St . Imp . = 80,809 . 72
71 Sewer Fund = 195 .00
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
Date IV,✓Em6f�
Applicant Name : Perkins ' Cake & Steak, Inc.
Address : 4917 Eden Avenue, Edina, Minnesota 55424
Phone : (612) 929-1333
Location of Proposed Project (address and legal description) :
Lot 2 , Block 1, Halo First Addition to Shakopee
Please answer fully all of the following questions . You may attach
requested documentati.ons :
1 . What is the specific proposed use of the facility?
24 hour family, sit-down, restaurant
� . What is the project ' s estimated minimum and maximum size and/or
capacity? 4885 sq. foot building seating 172 customers on
1 . 229 acre parcel .
3 . How many new people will be employed in Shakopee as a direct
result of this proposed project ? 80-100
4 . What is the proposed date for start of construction? Completion
of construction? January 1979 - July 1979
5 . What is the estimated range of costs for the facility :
as Building construction . $320, 000 . 00
b. Furnishings . $150, 000 . 00
c . Property development . $ 80 , 000. 00
d . Land acquisition . $135 , 000. 00
e . Professional fees .
Application for Commercial Development Issues Page 2
1 ) Architectural engineering
2 ) Legal/ Underwriting 30 , 000 . 00
3) Fiscal
f . Other (detail ) .
6 . What is the applicant ' s legal interest in the land?
Applicant has option -to purchase .
7 . A list of all members of any corporation , partnership or
other organizations which will have a legal and fiscal
interest in the ownership and management of project and that
identification of that interest , and listing of credit and
professional references for all interested parties ( if
applicable) . The restaurant will be owned and operated by
Perkins ' Cake & Steak, Inc . , a Minnesota corporation .
8 . Resume of any person, partnership , or corporation which will
own or manage any portion of the facility .
See Attached
9 . If any of the project is to be leased to other parties , an
identification of those parties and a showing of commitment
for that interest . N/A
10. If interim financing is required , a showing of a binding
commitment for that financing from a reputable lender .
None required
11 . Statement as to the fiscal financing method to be used such
as bonds , mortgage revenue notes , or unsecured debt .
Bonds
12 . Statement as to whether the financing instruments will be
sold to individuals , insurance companies , savings institutions
or other .
Professional institutions only.
13 . If considered appropriate by the City , a financing feasibility
report may be required which will detail those physical
service and financial factors which will indicate possible
success or failure of the proposed facility . \
See attached statements .
14 . Method of payment of all public cost to be incurred in develop-
ment of the property .
Perkins will reimburse the City of Shakopee .
Application for Commercial Development issues Page 3
15 . Name of the underwriter or investment banker who will be
selected to place the final financing . A list of at least
five other issues which have been completed by the underwriter
or banker shall be provided .
See attached statements
16 . Name of the proposed trustee to be designated .
Trustee of municipal choice or National City Bank of Minneapolis
Perkins ' Cake & Steak, Inc .
BY:
OZ�
(S /CI ed TS: 27/Qcc or
(Date)
i
RESUME: GEORGE H. HALVORSON
Educational Background:
Attended University of Minnesota from 9/38 to 6/43
Graduated with BBA
Attended Columbia University from 8/43 to 10/43 while serving in the
U. S. Navy
Attended Harvard University from 8/45 to 10/45 while serving in the
U. S. Navy
Attended University of Minnesota Graduate School from 9/46 to 6/47
Graduated
Business Background:
Mr. Halvorson was employed by Bache Halsey Stuart Shields Incorprated
from June of 1960 to October of 1977.
Mr. Halvorson was a Registered Representative, Vice President, Registered
Principal, Institutional Manager and Co-Branch Manager of Bache's
Minneapolis office.
While employed with Bache, Mr. Halvorson was licensed and/or registered
with or by the New York Stock Exchange, the American Stock Exchange, the
Chicago Board of Trade, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. , and the following states:
Arizona, California, Illinois, Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota.
As Co-Branch Manager of Bache's Minneapolis office, Mr. Halvorson helped
supervise between twenty and thirty registered representatives in the
retail business, and had complete supervision of the Institutional Department
in Minneapolis.
As the Institutional Manager, Mr. Halvorson participated in the organizing
and distribution of real estate tax shelters, oil and gas programs, corporate
and municipal bond issues, and many new stock issues. Attached are examples
of the types of bond issues that Mr. Halvorson was involved in. Exhibit I
represents one weeks municipal calendar of new issues and Exhibit II represents
one weeks corporate syndicate calendar.
In October of 1977, Mr. Halvorson joined First Corporate Services, Inc.
Mr. Halvorson is a owner, Director, President, Registered Principal,
Chief Operating Officer and Compliance Officer of the corporation. 'In this
capacity, Mr. Halvorson supervises all other registered personnel (three at
present) and their transactions.
RESUME: GEORGE H. HALVORSON
Page Two
Business Background: Continued
First Corporate Services, Inc. is a member of the National Association
of Securities Dealers, Inc. and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board, registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
licensed by the State of Minnesota.
Since joining First Corporate Services, Inc. , Mr. Halvorson has completed
and privately placed an Industrial Revenue Bond Issue for Perkins Cake &
Steak in Alexandria, Minnesota and has privately placed many mortgages.
First Corporate Services, Inc. has currently succeeded in having resolutions
passed by the City of Inver Grove Heights for a Budget Power Store; the
City of Vadnais Heights for a medical clinic for Bethesda Hospital; the
City of Blaine for a Perkins Cake & Steak restaurant; the City of Shoreview
for a office and warehouse building for Tektronix, Inc. ; and the City of
Maplewood for a Wendy's restaurant.
14v
MEMO TO : Mayor & City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder , City Administrator
RE: K-Mart
DATE: December 14, 1978
Attached is a memo which outlines the tentative agreement concerning
the Tax Increment Project at a meeting attended by Helen Lefler, K-Mart ,
Bob Pulscher , Tom Hay, Jeff Molde , Bo Spurrier , Lou Van Hout , James Holmes ,
Gary Eastland, Pat Griffin and Doug Reeder.
Since the writing of that memo several items have changed:
1 . It is now apparent that K-Mart will still have to build their
own 300,000 gallon storage tank for fire protection so that their
total benefit will be the lower figure of $3, 210,000.
2 . Because of the above , K-Mart requested that we lower the sale
price of the land to K-Mart from $700,00 to $520,000 in order that they
could get a round $2 ,000,000 direct benefit according to their figures .
I have said absolutely no, that the offer given is as far as the city
can go and the best we can do.
3. The installation of the watermain outside of the Tax Incre-
ment project , using special assessments , means that some liability could
fall on SPUC because of the costs of oversizing the pipe . The oversizing
is estimated at $75 ,000. It is my recommendation that this $75,000 either
be assessed directly to Scottland and not to SPUC or that the price of
the land purchase price from Scottland be reduced by a like sum. I assume
Scottland would prefer the cash and accept the 10 year assessment .
I do not think SPUC should have to bear this cost if we can avoid it .
CONCLUSION:
I am very pleased with the progress to date and the proposed tax
increment project . I think there is something for everyone in it and
makes good sense . We still have many details to work out , the major
one being the type of financing (G.O. bonds or revenue bonds) . The
schedule on the last page is a very tight schedule which I think will
be hard to meet .
DSR/jsc
ti
CITY OF SHAKOPEE °
INCORPORATED 1970
129 E. First Ave., Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
P (612)445-3650
F<r
f
m
MEMO TO: Helen C. Lefler
Real Estate Representative
K-Mart Corporation
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
City of Shakopee
DATE: December 11 , 1978
This memo is to set forth my understanding of the agreements reached
in our meeting of December 7th, 1978 in the office of Daugherty, Dawkins .
I will present to the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority ,
on December 19th, a proposal that the following be included in a Redevelop-
ment Plan for the 100 + acre area proposed to be purchased by the K-Mart
Corporation for the construction of a warehouse facility.
A. :Property purchase $1 , 100,000
B. Project site work including
grading and filling of site 7205000
C. On site utility construction 7003000
D. Construction of 1 . 5 million
gal . municipal water
storage tank 1 , 100,000
E. Municipal well 250,000
TOTAL $3 , 870,000
The redevelopment plan will call for the sale of the property with
improvements to K-Mart for $700,000. This will make the amount of
financing by tax increment $3 , 170,000.
In addition I will propose to the Shakopee City Council that the
following be constructed and assessed against the benefitting properties :
A. Storm sewer project needed to drain the K-Mart site and other
industrial land owned by Scottland - $300,000
B. Watermain installation from the proposed storage tank to the
proposed well - $250,000
C. Installation of Sanitary Sewer on County Road 83 as far South as
possible - $100,000
Helen C. Lefler
December 11 , 1978
Page -2-
Scottland agrees to pay all assessments levied against the K-Mart
property at the time the assessments are levied.
It is further understood that K-Mart will do the following when
needed:
1 . Submit , as soon as possible , a definate estimated value of the
proposed warehouse facility
2. Provide land to the City for the proposed water storage tanks
3. Provide adequate assurance that a tax increment sufficient to
pay the debt service on the bonds will be available
4. aubmit, as soon as possible , a detailed list and description of
work to be included in site work and on site utility construction
DSR/jsc
CC: Tom Hay ✓
Robert Pulscher ✓
Jeff MoIde i/
Bo Spurrier ✓
Lou Van Hout
James Holmes
Gary Eastland
Pat Griffin ;/
ESTIMATED BENEFITS OF ALL PROPOSED WORK
SCOTTLAND K MART CITY
Site Purchase $1 , 100,000
Site Work 720,000
On Site Utilities 700,000
Off Site Watermain $210,000 40,000
Off Site Storm Sewer 200,000 100,000
Municipal Water Tank"- 500,000 to $600,000 to
800,000 300,000
Off Site Sanitary Sewer 50,000 50,000
Municipal Well 1253000 125 ,000
TOTAL BENEFIT $585,000 $3 , 210,000 to $725 ,000 to
3 , 510,000 425 ,000
If the proposed municipal water storage facility can take the place of
both the elevated storage facility and the ground storage facility proposed
for the K Mart Warehouse , than the benefit to K Mart is $800,000. If
K Mart must still construct a ground storage facility, 'hen the benefit
to K Mart would be $500,000.
12-11-78
PROPOSED ADAPTION SCHEDULE
December 14th City Council and Housing Authority Agenda
mailed for December 1.9th meeting.
December 19th A . Housing Authority adapt Redevolopment Plan
and send to City Council and Planning Commission .
B. City Council set date for public hearing .
December 20 - 28th Planning Commission reviewal Redevelopment Plan.
December 28th City Council agenda mailed for January 2nd meeting.
January 2nd , 1979 A. Public Hearing held on Redevelopment Plan.
B. City Council adapt plan (or table to January 9th . )
C. City Council make determination of financing
structure (or table to January 9th) .
January 4th City Council agenda mailed for January 9th special
meeting if needed .
January 9th City Council special meeting to adapt Redevel.opmei,t
Plan and/or financing structure if needed .
February Proposed Bond Sale .
February 6th & 20th Regular City Council meetings in February .
12-11-78
,F
MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Memo from Bo Spurrier dated Dec . 14, 1978
DATE: December 14, 1978
In reviewing the memo ' from the City Engineer, I find no great
problem in substitution of a radio for a traffic counter and the
Engineer feels that there is a great need for the radios . The price
break available by ordering two radios immediately is worth reallocating
the 1978 appropriation. The 1979 Engineering appropriation will be
reduced accordingly at a later date .
As far as the -..')lculator is concerned, the City Engineer feels
strongly that this piece of equipment will significantly enhance the
productivity of his department and desires the purchase as soon as
possible . The calculators now being used, as a stop-gap measure in
that department , are owned by other employees .
In the normal course of operation, I would not support the use
of the contingency appropriation in this manner; however, when the need
is justified and savings can be achieved by the timing of purchases ,
I feel it is warranted.
Recommended action: Increase Engineering Capital Equipment and
decrease Unallocated Contingency by $860.00. Resolution No . 1350
GV/jsc
MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
FROM: Bo Spurrier , City Engineer
RE: Capital Purchases
DATE: December 14, 1978
After reviewing the remaining 1978 capital equipment purchases to
be made and the anticipated 1979 purchases , I found a need to shift
emphasis .
I noted that the 1978 budget included traffic counters . I have
more use for two-way radios and propose to reallocate capital funds for
purchase of a two-way radio . The radio manufacturer plans on across
the board price increase in late December 1978, since there is a simular
allocation in the 1979 budget , I propose to order the second radio now
to take advantage of cost savings (approximately $160 for the two radios).
Since the radios would not arrive until February 1979, 1978 and 1979 funds
would not be disbursed until that time .
The second area of concern is calculators . With the Engineering
Department performing more complex computations , it will be necessary
to have calculators which perform most engineering computations . The
need for at least one hand held programable calculator, immediately,
is great . One such unit would alleviate some of the problems , but we
still need another machine which is in the budget for 1979. One calculator
is $225 .00.
HRS/jsc
r �
� f
s
x
w �
C
P
4 ,
Or
w I tY
rr-
x
y�$�Y [ TT frill,
i N S
F
e
f ..,�
xb„
r` -W lwl
y n�
y
r
v
n
4
t.
.N
_
tot....
n t
>
}
�w
n
i� Hk
s
m
c
�i
J
f
R", A,
3 e
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
General Fund
Expenditure Report by Division
November 30, 1978
Division Budget YTD Exp . Bal . Avail . %
Mayor & Couticil 20, 763 19,268 1 ,495 92 .8
City Admin. 94, 232 78,410 15 , 822 83 . 2
Elections 2 , 200 3 , 153 ( 953) 116.0
Assessor 37 , 937 31 , 974 5, 963 84. 3
Finance 60, 326 50,567 9, 759 83 . 8
Legal 25 , 300 29, 610 (4, 310) 117 .0
Planning Comm. 41 ,000 11 , 165 29, 835 27 .2
Govt . Bldg . 48,418 40, 269 8, 149 83 .2
Police/School Liaison 22 , 673 17 , 115 5 , 558 75 . 5
Police 386 , 508 325 , 732 60, 776 84 .3
Fire 71 , 972 56 , 530 15 ,442 78. 5
Inspection 37 , 562 29, 329 8, 233 78.0
Insp . Electr. 2 , 300 2 , 222 78 96 . 6
Civil Defense 18, 991 1 ,508 17 ,483 7 . 9
Animal Control 4,050 3 , 558 492 87 . 8
Engineering 67 , 624 58 , 901 8 , 723 87 . 1
Street & Alley 256 , 272 204, 958 51 , 314 80.0
Shop 22 ,803 19,067 3 , 736 83 . 6
Storm Sewer 7 , 918 7 ,482 436 94. 5
Weed Control 820 268 552 32 . 7
Pool 31 , 515 30,897 618 98.0
Parks 128 , 994 98 , 900 30,094 76 . 7
Forestry 43 , 126 193743 23 , 383 45 . 8
Garbage 80,050 71 ,083 8, 967 88 . 8
Unallocated 903724 48, 148 42 , 576 53 . 1
1 , 604,078 1 , 259 ,857 344, 221 78 . 5
11/12 = 91 . 7%
O 1S78 CITY CF SHANU'EE R E V E N U E R E P 0 R T AS OF 11-30-78 PAGE 1
FUNC 01 CENFkAL FUND C U R R E N T M 0 N T H Y E A F T O 0 A T E
ACCOUNT/CESCkIPTION ES1. kEVENUE ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT EST. RFVENUE ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT
_. . 3011 L;-:N. LFVV - CUW:NT _ _ ._ .00 968.8 4529941.00 237.078.09 215.862.91- 52.3
3012 SP.LEVV - JUUG[-MENTS .00 19429.00 747.63 681.37- 52.3
3013 INVALIU LBJECT .00 .00 .00 .00
_ 3014 INVALIC LbJECT 000 000 .00 000
3015 SP. LEVY - MATCHINU FUNDS .00 62,940.00 32,855.86 30,044.14- 52.3
3C16 SHACE TREE CISEASE 2,511.71 25#087.00 15,636.85 99450.15- 62.3
_.._3017 INC. IND. 6 COMM. CEV. ._ _ 000 _ 429123.00 229013.64 201109.36- 52.3
3020 CEL. FRLPEFTY TAXES .00 119000.00 91337.95 1►662.05- 64.9
3021 P:NALTIES 6 INTEREST .00 .00 .00 000
+*�+
1A.AH 29511.71 5951520.00 317#710.02 2779809.98- 53.4
_-- 3111 LICLCF LICFNS=S -------------_-- -..___. .00 __-. -- --_-.- .- _ -_ 321800.00 --.-33,661.70 861.70 102.6
3112 BEER LICENSES .00 31720.00 49349.38 329.38 108.9
311: BINCC LICENSES 100.00 50.00 105.00 55.00 210.0
_ 3114 CIGARETTE LICENSES _._._ _ 000 520000 218.00 302.00- 41 .9
3115 MISL. BUSINESS LICENSES .00 .00 708.00 708.00
31?0 COG LICENSES 10.00 1, 500.00 19044.50 455.50- 69.6
++*t LICENSES G PERMITS 110.00 38,590.00 399786.58 1r 196.58 103.1
3130 .00 .00 .00 .00
«++• .00 .00 .00 .00
31:1 PCLL TABLE LIL:NSE5 .00 1,775.00 850.00 925.00- 47.9
3132 BUILDING PERMITS 29387.00 22,000.00 27,463.30 51463.30 124.8
•*** LILENSFS 6 PERMITS 29387.00 239775.00 289313.30 4,538.30 119.1
--- 3132 _ .00 .00 .00 .00
*+** .00 .00 .00 .00
3133 FLLMBING PLkMITS 589.00 69200.00 9#295.32 3,095.32 149.9
31 24 PrLFANICAL PERMITS 220.00 3,400.00 4,861.79 19481.79 143.6
3135 WELL PERMITS 61.00 450.00 713.50 263.50 158.6
31 2E SEFFk E WATER PERMITS 110.00 400.00, 980.00 580.00 245.0
3137 ELECTRICAL PERMITS 60.00 29800.00 29956.50 196.50 107.0
313E STFEET OPENING PERMITS 50.00 300.00 470.00 170.00 156.7
3139 MISC. NGN-BUS. PEkNITS .00 25.00 6.00 19.00- 24.0
314C UTILIIV INS. PEkMI1S .00 .00 .00 .01
++«� LICENSES 6 PFRMIIS 1#090.00 13,575.00 19r343.1i 59768.11 142.5
_ 3? 10 FECEFAL ,RANtS 711.11 47x405.00 309569.03 16,835.97- 64.5
3320 SIt1E CkANTS 499890.Y4 30,278.00 E49806.14 341528.14 214.0
3:=0 LULAL CUVT. AIU 529634.75 2109539.0C 210039.CO .00 100.0
3331 ATTtCHFC MACH. AID 14x654.00 109000.00 29,308.00 199308.00 ZQ3.1
33:2 STATF tWV.NAINT. AIF .00 14000.00 129622.50 19377.50- 90.2
3334 PULILE STATE 4IL 229397.56 18,000.00 229397.56 4097.56 124.4
..r
3335 FIFE STATF Ali) .0.3 .00 .00 .00
1578 C 1 lY LF SHAKOPFE k F V E N U E R E P O R T AS OF 11-30-78 PAGE 2
FUNC 01 LENERAL FUND _ ._._ . .. C U R R E N T M 0 N T H Y E A F T O D A T E
ACCLLNI/CESLRIPTILN EST. REVENUE ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT EST. REVENUE ACTUAL - VARIANC- PCT
_ 3340 CCLNIY ROAD C BRIDGE AIC _ _ __. .00 .00 .00 .00
3360 SPLC PYMT.IN LIEU LF TXS. 209032.00 2569000.00 2209352.00 359648.00- 86.1
**** GRANTS & AIDS 160020.36 5869222.00 590094.23 4,372.23 100.7
34:1 INVALID LBJECT .00 .00 .00 .00
3510 ENG. GRADE FEE ----____ __ .__ _ __ 24.00 _ _. 240.00 303.00 63.00 126.,'
3511 PLtA LHECK FEE 576.50 39500.00 49841.48 19341.48 138 '
3512 ASSESSMENT S5ARCFES 41.00 150.00 122.00 28.00- 81,
_ _ 3513 SALE CF MAPS __.. ... _ 12050 200.00 ..403.00 203.00 201.5
3514 PLATS-REILN-VAR-CONC.USE 202.00 19000.00 29723.00 19723.00 272.3
3515 SURVEY CHECK FEE 24.00 240.00 306.00 66.00 127.5
__.3517 MISC. FFUPEFTY RENTALS..____ __...250.00 _ _ _. 79350900 49640.00 29710.00- 63.1
3518 STREET REPAIR 896.35 2,500.00 19464.35 19015.65- 59.4
3520 SNCb REMLVAL .00 11000.00 525.00 475.00- 52 5
3521 PLBLIC INURKS RENTALS __ _. .00 _ _ _ 50.00 .00 . 50.00- .0
3522 6FEC CLTTINL CHARGES .00 50.00 .00 50.00- .0
3523 MISC.PB.WKS.SERVICES .00 100.00 269.59 169.59 269.6
_._.524 SALE LF LITY PkUPEkTY .00 .00 191b0.98 19180.98
3530 ACCICENT REPORTS .00 150.00 102.00 48.00- 68.0
35?1 MISC. PULILE SFRVICES .00 .00 250.00 250.00
3532 PULNC FFFS L FINES _ _ _. _ ... 70.00 350.00 746.00 396.00 213,1
3`.33 F1PE CALLS 6 STANDEY FEES .00 6,000.00 39850.00 29150.00- 64.1
3!24 F1RF NUMFEk FEES .00 100.00 .00 100.00- 0
-.3540 SEASLA IICKFTS-POOL _._.____________.__.__ .. . .00 __ _ _ _ . 15,879.00 _ 119759.00 4,120.00- 74, 1
3_41 ACMISSIDNS-PCOL .00 4,100.00 4,439.10 339.10 108.3
3542 Sh1MM1NG LESSONS .00 5,807.00 4, 167.00 19040.00- 82.1
3543 MISC. PULL INCOME _. ._ _.._.__ .___ .._. ... .00 600.00 _ 255.82 344.18- 42.6
3610 LCLNIV COURT FINES 3,407.80 239000.00 279467.93 4,467.93 119.4
3731 GAREAGE CULL. LHARGES .00 80,000.00 669796.76 139203.24- 83..5
__. 374C STATE SURCHARGE FEE _. ._ .00 .00 .00 .00
3810 INIEREST 10296.01 79000.00 8,615.31 19615.31 123.1
382C CCNCESSILNS-PLOL .00 3,400.00 3,355990 44.10- 98.7
_ _ 3824 SALE CF GASLLINE 690.05 49400.00 49909.20 509.20 111.6
3b 30 PFkhANENT TkANSFERS .00 176,525.00 649284.56 929240.44- 47.7
385C CLNTk1BUTIUNS L CUKATIL N .00 500.00 11000.00 500.00 200.0
38.1 INCLSTFY AGREEMENT _ .00 .00 4,95.8.32 4,938.32
3673 CEVFLUPEP.S LEPOSIT .00 .00 69370.89 69370.89
3950 8EFLNCS & kEtilBURSEMENTS 42.10 11000.00 4,448.83 3,448.83 444.9
3951 INS. CLAIMS L SETTLEMFNTS .00 .00 .00 .00
3SSC MISLELLAP;FUUS 116.39 500.00 1, 506.C2 1,006.02 301.2
**»* OThER REVENUES _ 7,652.70 345,691.00 256,681.04 89,009.96- 74.3
_ _- FUND TOTALS 174,071.77 1,603,373.00 1,252,428.28 3509944.72- 78.1
O 1978 CITY CI SHAKOPEI E X P E N D I T U R E R E P O R T AS OF 11-30-78 I Pd GE 1
FUNC__. 01 CENEkAL FUND _._- __.__ C _U__R k- E N T M 0 N T N_ Y- ..E A k -T 0 D_A T .E
ACLULNT/CESLkIPTICN APPRLPRIATION ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT APPRO?RIATI(IN ACTUAL VARIANC7 PCT
___41C0_SALARIES-FULL TINE _ ____441042.28 __..__619,466.00 51$,.831.25._ _100,634.75 _ 83.8
4110 INVALIC UbJECT .00 .00 .00 .00
4112 OVERTIME-FULL TIMF 494.66 8,330.00 5,235.64 3,094.36 62.9
____4130 SALARIES - 'PART TIME _. _. -7,133.15 859884.00 _ _..._ 821.525.56 _39358.44 96.1
4131 CVERIIME-PAFT TIME .00 .00 .00 .00
41:2 SEVERANCE PAY .00 .00 .00 .00
_-_414Q_PFRA 2 824.14 51,455.00 "35,678.40 159776.60 69.3
4141 PENSICNS-FICA 1,306.08 229073.00 179236.51 4,836.49 78.1
4142 PEN5ILNS-FIVE .00 4,608.00 .00 49608.00 .0
___._4150 .HEALTI- L LIFE 1NSUPANCE _ _.__1,439.91 - 309310.00 " . " _ 18,350.59_ 11#959.41 60.5
4151 hUFKfrNS COMP.INSUkANCE .00 32,751. 00 29,283.79 39467.21 89.4
4152 UNE111ILCYMFNT CLMP. .00 11000.00 .00 11000.00 .0
**+* PEFSCNAL SERVICES 579240.22 8559877.00 707,141.74 1489735.26 82.6
____.421C OFFICE SUPPLIES � 11.47 .__ _ 3,850.00 __._31376.91 473.09 87.7
4215 INVALIC C)bJECT .00 .00 .00 .00
4220 6ENEFAL SUPPLIES 29949.45 21,150.00 18,833.15 2,316.85 89.0
-5221_LhFh 1CAL S _ . __ _ -__ .OQ_ _ __...____._ ___ _ _2,900.00 -_ _ -2-e 637.31 262.69 90.9 _
4222 MOTCF FUELS E LUBRICANTS 467.52 30,325.00 259088.35 59236.65 62.7
4223 CLLTFING-PEF.S.EUUIPMENT 337.85 21500.00 3, 180.80 680.80-127.2
_. .4224 SAFETY SUPPLIES - ------- ---------_ . .00 -- - ---------_--- _ _ 1.600.00 _ __ 458,85 1#141.15 28.7
4225 SMALL IOCL PURCHASES 387.96 39250. 00 19950.97 19299.03 60.0
42:0 FVLIP.MAINT. L kF"PAIR 917.97 120 00.00 14,224.47 1,324.47-110.3
-_4221 uLCG.MAINT C REPAIF- .-_.-_._ __ __.228.70 ._ _- 5,450.00 49374.32 19075.68 80.3
4ii2 VEF-ICLE MAINT. L REPAIR 19395.60 20,400.00 1892E5.83 2,134.17 89.5
4233 COPP. SYSTEM MAINT. 133.40 49200.00 4,364.27 164.27-103.9
4234 UTIL.5YST_M MAINT. L CCN._____ __ _._ .00 5000.00 _ 599.53 49400.47 12.0
424C kGAC MATERIALS 256.60 4,900. 00 3,628.08 871.92 80.6
4241 FATO-1NG MATERIALS 722.60 6,000.00 5, 330.90 669.10 86.8
4242 SEAL CCA11N6 .00 20,000. 00 19,356.55 643.45 96.8
4243 GPCLNCS MAINT. MATERIALS 38.00 39000.00 955.95 29044.05 31.9
4244 ICE CCNTkUL MATERIALS .00 39000.00 870.00 2,130.00 29.0
_ 4250 SICNSCSTKIPING MATERIALS _ 109.50 6000.00 39005.02 3,694.98 44.9
4203 INVALIC UbJELT .00 .00 .00 .00
** $ SUPPLIES L,FEPAIRS 7#956.62 _._ . 156,725.00, 130,_501.26 26,223.74 83.3
43CO INVALIC LbJECT .00 .00 .00 .00
_ 4310 LEGAL SEFVILFS 29054.93 25,00,7.00 34,125.63 9,125.63-136.5
4311 AUCIT L F►N. SEERVILES .00 69000.09 5,853.20 146.80 97.6
4312 ENGINEERING SERVICES 1, 374.00 189650.00 11,353.00 79297.00 60.9
"4'13 ECF CESIGN L SUFTtitRF .00 .00 15.00 15.00-
4314 PLAKNING 1,850.00 24,500.00 5,950.00 18,650.00 23.9
4315 CTFEF FPUF. SERVICES 532.70 509070.00 32,453.66 17,616.14 64.8
**+� PPLFESSILNAL SCRVIFS 51810.93 1241220.00 89,650.69 34,569.31 72.2
__432C POSIAGE 430.00 2,810. 00 2,641.75 168.25 54.0
4321 1FLFFhLNE 1,175.74 11,050.00 10,816.18 233.82 97.9
CCPPLNICAT ILNS 1,605.74 13060.00 13,457.93 402.07 97.1
^ 1S 78 C I I V LF SHAKUP=E E X P E N D I T U R E R E P O R T AS OF 11-30-78 PAGE 2
FLAD. CI GENERAL FUND ___.._.._ ._____________ _C..U__R R E N T M 0 N -T. H_ ____ __ . .. Y .E A_P T C D A T E
ACCLUNT/CESCFIPTIUN APPROPRIATION ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT APPROPRIATION ACTUAL VARIANCF PCT
4_3C _TRAVEL EXPENSi ___ _ _ ._ 226.51 __. _ _ 7,.530.00 -__5-s_134.51_- 2,395.49 6£!.2
**++ TRAVEL 226.51 7,530.00 5,134.51 2,395.49 68.2
4350 LEGAL NUTICFS PUBLISHING 673.97 7,225.00 79505.15 230.15-103.9
4351 PRINTING 6 REPRODUCTION 324.17 4,250.00 5006.56 756.56-117.8
**** PRINTING S FvPROCUCT 998.14 119475.00 12,511.71 1,036.71-109.0
43_E0 C5N. 6 LIAb. INSURANCE___ .00• _ _. ____. __ _ 49740.00 ANS48.40 6,108.40-228.9
43E1 PkCP. 6 LUILF.R INSURANCE .00 79686.00 7,164.39 521.61 93.2
43E2 VEFICLE 6 FIUIP.INS. .00 12,562.00 11,989.07 572.93 95.4
**** INSURANCE .00 249988.00 309701.86 5,013.86-120.1
__....4370 ELECIR.ICITY _....__-. 19354.71 _. _ _ 219.700.00 __. 1.79-372.46 49327.54. 80.1
4371 NAILRAL LAS 6 hTG 293.56 129220.00 119406.16 813.84 93.3
4:72 INATER .00 19584.00 19232.42 351.58 77.8
--4373_GARB.CISPOSAL/OUMP_CH6S_. --_62679.22 ________ .___. ____---__._-._____ 80,130.00 _ _-__.73s202,-74-_. _ 69927.26 91.4
43EC LAND RENTAL .00 19200.00 469.52 710.48 40.8
43E1 BUILCING RENTAL .00 .00 364.14 364.14-
____.43E2 ..MACHINERY RENTAL ____._-�___.___ _.,__- .00 _ __._ ._._- 39150.00 19742.66 _ 1,407.34 55.3
4?E3 UFFILE FGUIPM_NT RENTAL 294.87 39900.00 39298.39 601.61 84.6
4384 EOF E(wLIPMFNT RENTAL 874.43 189750.00 14,223.93 49526.07 75.9
**** UTILITIES 6 RENTALS 9,496.79 1429634.00 123, 332.42 199301.58 86.5
4390 CCNFERENLES 6 SCHOCLS . . _._ _915.00 _.- 119195.00 - .- 89167.56 _. 39027.44 73.0
4351 DUES 6 SUBSCR1PTIGNS 128.50 59250.00 4,905.59 344.41 93.4
4 2-92 LICENSES .00 355.00 426.75 71.75-120.2
-_4393 AkIRCS 6 INCF.i4NITIES'. _--- ---------•__--- _. .00 - _ .00 _11_25Q.00__-- 19250.00-
43S4 HCCKS 6 PAMPHLETS 152.25 19880.00 19516.60 363.40 80.7
435E MEETING EXPENSE 69.65 820.00 698.71 121.29 85.2
+*+• CCKF,SCHLLLS,d00KS 19265.40 19,500.00 16,965.21 29534.79 87.0
-441C-JANITORIAL SERVICES -__ _-_- 982.92_ _ - _ - 9,750.00_-_-_1.12-?95.04„_ _ 29045.04-121.0
4411 CURRENT uSE CHAR(,ES .00 850.00 .00 650.00 .0
4425 BLLCC TESTS 13.00 300.00 234.00 66.00 78.0
**+• PRISLN HUARC GJANITU 995.92 109900.00 12,029.04 1,129.04-110.4
_45CS LAFIIAL-LTHFR .00 149800.00 . - - 16,005.93 _-_ - 1,205.93-108.1
4510 CAPITAL - VEHICLES .00 33,200.00 299228.31 39971.69 88.0
4511 CAFITAL-EOUIPt4FNT 421.00 65025.00 239166.34 42,658.66 35f.2
-__-4512 LAPIIAL-UFFILE ECUIPMENT 19127.08 81,463.00 3,531.22 4,931.78 41.7
4513 FCh 6 EASEMENT COSTS .00 .00 .00 .00
451E SERER CLNSIkUCTILN .00 .00 .00 .00
451S_-LTHP IMPROVEMENTS _ 00 28,600.00 _13,020.49 - 15,579.51 _ 45.5
+**• CAFITAL 6 IMPRCVMNIS 19548.08 150,688. 00 84,952.29 659935.71 56.3
1S7b CITY CF SHAKOPEE E X P E N D I T U R E R E P C R T AS OF 11-30-78, PAGE 3
_ FLKD 01 CENERAL FUND _ __C_U-, R_ R- E .N i M 0 N T H _ Y E A R _ T 0• D A T E
ACCLUNT/CFSCKIPTIUN APPRCPR-I AT ION ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT APPRUPRIATION ACTUAL VAPIANCE PCT
-__411C PEPNANENT TRANSFERS _ _.-___ .00 _ __ 269333.00 -269333.00 .._ .00 100.0
4940 MEFCHAND1SE FUR RESALE .90 11500.00 1962201.7 122.17-108.1
4950 IN%ALIC OBJECT .00 .00 73.00 73.00-
-._. 45EC REFLNCS -_-_______-...________ 15.60 600.00 _ _ 1900144. ._ __ 401.44-166.9
49E1 SALES TAX .00 750.00 623.00 127.00 83.1
45E2 TA}E'_ .00 .00 .00 .00
-_49SO L+ISCELLANEUUS 19105.39 _._ 1.075.00 __.59548.57 .39473.57-423.1
4991 CONIINCENCY .00 55.223.00 000 559223.00 .0
•*++ LTFEF EXPENDITJRES _ 19120.99 _ 659481.00 349201.18 - 519279.82 40.0
__._.. _. FUNC TOTALS __._ tl81265.34 ____ __ __ _ 19604078.00 l9.259t879.84__ 3449198.16 78.5
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
A7
tR, 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
r
A11'
MEMO
TO: - Douglas S . Reeder , City Administrator
FROM: Jon W. Erichson , Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: West Side Storm Sewer Assessments
DATE:_ November 27 , 1978
West Side Storm Sewer Assessments that were paid prior
to the October 10th deadline amounted to $128,330. This is
approximately 23% of all pending assessments that have been
paid . There were 701 assessments of which 417 are paid .
I
r
The Minneapolis Star Fri.,Dec. 15, 1978
'Shakopee puzzlin'
sewer- lant toxin is
by WALTER T.MIDDLEBROOK WHILE MINNESOTA Pollution and residential—in the soi
S Minneapolis Star Staff Writer
Investigators from the Metro- 1 Control Agency (PCA) officials metropolitan area, includir
�iolitan Waste Commission have * ,, !` don't see the suspected PCBs as an of Minnetonka, Chaska, Sl
to ' immediate problem, they fear in- and Prior Lake,Dougherty
en scurrying to determine the r
ti 1 creasing levels could be dangerous. "We think we may have
source of increased levels of a � ° �< (the source),"he said,but h.
highl toxic chemical, believed to � �°" Tests of-the sludge samples from
y the lent revealed levels of the tox- not Identify it.
be PCBs, at the Blue Lake sewage ;x P . However,Hora is not Sur
treatment plant. is chemical ranging from 2 to 11 single source will ever
PCBs,or polychlorinated biphen +` � ,°° a parts of the chemical per million "There are probably a lots
yls, are found in industrial oils ' parts of the sludge.Only one of the sources causing he large
used in the production of electrical `Y 7 samples' contained I I aparts per lem,"he said. 8 g
ar
transformers and capacitors. Their million;'others were in the 6-to-7
The commission doesn't'
use has been banned nationally be- ' P arts range and many showed 2 to as that much of a'problem
Cause they have been shown to „ . 4 parts per million.
technical standpoint,„ Do'
cause cancer and birth defects. >t l A Less than one part pe nt.r million said. "But from a emotiona
High levels of a toxic chemical °?• � � would be considered good, said point,it could be a problem.
were found in sludge Sam les tak-
g P ' ;' Marvin Hora,'senior biologist with Especially in light of th
en from the sewage treatment ` r`. the PCA.He said the Federal Drug vious protests over the; c4
plant on Hwy. 101 in Shakopee Administration has recommended sion's request for asludge-d
from March to July. However, that if more than 10 parts per mil- landfill in Shakopee. ,
sludge-sample testing, the results
of Which were not available until lion are found, the sludge should t
i not be applied to land.
September and early October,have Readings in the n to 10 parts per
proved inconclusive. million are in the "gray” area,
Richard Dougherty, the waste Hors. said: `'There's no easy an-
gontrol commission's chief adpil saver."
istrator, said experts still are not I
sure whether the-sludge contains ' Dougherty .feels that the levels
PCBs or a similar toxic chemical. of the toxic chemical might have
leveled off since the earlier read-
THE SAMPLES were taken be-
ings were taken.
cause the waste commission wants "We have not,seen those kinds
to use some land that it owns in ' ti of readings" since the commission
Shakopee to dispose of the sludge '. ., ; began its intensive investigation in
from its Blue Lake facility The PCB LEVELS SUSPECTED November,he said:
plant produces about 90,060 gal- Se
wag plant sludge probed
lens of sludge a day. PART OF the problem in finding
There are at least two ways of where the suspected PCBs are
disposing of the sludge: Burning it has challoaged the council's deci- coming from is that'the Blue Lake
Ind'dumping it or plowing it into Sion, Redder said, and the Cage is plant treats sewage from many
land. before_t6e courts. sources—industrial, commercial
Sludge has a high nutrient value,
and it is being used as fertilizer qn
three.';experimental plots in the
Twin Cities area and in other areas
of the country.
However, sludge from the Blue
Lake plant is not used on land;it is
transported by truck to another
treatment plant in Eagan Twp.and
urned, which oxidizes any PCBs
the sludge and disperses them
armlessly into the atmosphere. ,
ThC Shakopee City Council had
denied the commission's request
for A P�rmit to use land a mlle
souttt Q the Blue Lake plant as "
1aandfill because of "inadequ
proof" assuring,the safety of y
residents, said` Douglas -Hee r,
city administrator.
Protests from ;area residents
played a considerg"ble. role in the
decision to deny kite permit, lie,
said.
The waste control �commission
METRO CLEAN AIR COMMITTEE
4�y
1829 PORTLAND AVENUE,MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55404 • 871-7332
z
December 13, 1978
Douglas Ruder, City Adm.
City of Shakopee
129 E. 1st Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Mr. Ruder:
The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 and their impact on Minnesota
communities will be studied at a conference for public officials
the evening of Wednesday, January 10, 1979, at the Thunderbird
Motel in Bloomington.
We invite you to be our guest at the dinner and conference, which is
described in the enclosed brochure. Please make your reservation
by completing and returning the attached form by January 5.
We will be happy to answer any questions you may have about the
public officials' conference if you will call (612) 871-7332.
Sincerely,
Barbara L. Hughes /
Director
Enclosure
BLH/da RECEiviv
DEC 1
CITY Of SHAKOPEE
SPONSORED BY THE AIMERICAN LUNG ASSOC!ATION OF HENNIEHP!N COUNTY
jr f F; METRO CLEAN AIR COMMITTEE
<, ` 1829 PORTLAND AVENUE, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55404 • 871-7332
December 7, 1978f ,✓. ��, i ,C
Douglas Reeder, City Adm.
City of Shakopee
129 E. 1st Ave. ' r
Shakopee, MN 55379
f
Dear Mr. Reeder:
I want to thank you for allowing time at a recent meeting of your city
council for a brief presentation on the Clean Air Act. Work is pro-
gressing on the writing of the regulations, and we will soon have more
detailed information than we have been able to present to date.
The first two of four issues of SIP News have been mailed, and another
issue is in the making. If there is specific information you would like
to have presented in a future SIP News, we would like to hear from you.
Also, we will be happy to send you a supply of either of the printed
pamphlets you have received if you wish to make them available to the
public through your office.
The conference for elected officials which I mentioned in my presentation
will be held on Wednesday, January 10, 1979, at the Thunderbird Motel
(Highway 494 at the 24th Ave. Exit) , starting with dinner at 6:00 p.m.
and adjourning by 10:00 p.m. We hope that at least one elected official
from -your city will want to attend as our guest and take advantage of
the opportunity to learn what the Clean Air Act means to Minnesota and
to your city, to represent your constituents ' interests, and to voice
the opinions of your city council . A formal letter of invitation and
final program agenda will follow.
One section of the State Implementation Plan, dealing with Prevention
of Significant Deterioration (PSD) , will be of particular interest to
suburban city governments. I am, therefore, enclosin excerpts from
the October 16, 1978 issue of "Environmental Report" National League
of Cities) which offers a good discussion of PSD and the role elected
officials have in the preparing of regulations.
Sincerely,
A�� OL�t�_ �
Marjor hristensen
Project Director
Enclosure
MC/da
SPONSORED BY THE AMERICAN LUNG ASS=3(7,*A7ION nr J1_-'JNE'PW COUNTY