HomeMy WebLinkAboutApril 18, 1978 %. 0 TENTATIVE AGENDA
ADJ.REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APRIL 18, 1978
Mayor Harbeck presiding.
1 . Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M.
2 . Approval of Minutes of April 4, 1978.
Communications :
a] Senator Anderson - Re : nighttime transmission
b]
4. Liaison reports from Councilmembers :
a] Cncl .Hullander from Shakopee School Board
b] Cncl .Lebens from Recreation Board
c ] Cncl .Reinke from Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
d] Cncl .Ward from Joint Seven Man Committee
e] Cncl .Leroux from Shakopee Fire Department
f ] Mayor Harbeck from Scott County Board of Commissioners
5 . RECOGNITION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANYONE PRESENT IN THE AUDIENCE WHO
DESIRES TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA!
6. Old Business :
a] 1978-1980 Police Contract - tabled 4/11
b] Eleventh Avenue Storm Sewer - tabled 4/11
7 . Planning Commission Recommendations :
a] Preliminary Plat of Minnesota Valley 2nd Addition, lying south
of Minn. Valley 1st Addition
Developer : Gary Laurent
Action: Approve/deny
Planning Comm. Recommendation: Approval with conditions
Joint 7-Man Land Use Comm. Recommendation: Approval
b] Request for rezoning of 40 acre tract lying South and Southwest
of Minnesota Valley 1st Addition from R-1 to R-2 and R-3B
Applicant : Gary Laurent
Action: Resolution No . 1240 (R-2) ; Res . No. 1241 (R-3B)
Planning Comm. Recommendation: Approval
Joint 7-Man Land Use Comm. Recommendation: Approval
c ] Rezoning of that part of SE-14 of Section 12-115-22 , lying
East of CR-89, not now zoned I-1 , (except currently developed
residential area) from R-2 , C-1 , and R-1 to an I-1 zone
Applicant : Planning Commission initiated action
Action: Resolution No . 1242
Planning Comm. Recommendation: Approval
8. Rout ' e Resolutions and Ordinances :
a] Res . No . 1239, Supporting the Construction of An Elderly
Highrise in the City of Shakopee
b] rd. No . 4, Defining Vandalism, Placing Responsibility for Acts
of Vandalism In Certain Cases and Prescribing A Penalty for
the Violation Hereof
9. New Business :
a] 7 : 45 P.M. -Presentation on small bridge on Hwy 169 North of river
by Mr. Al Pint , Minnesota Dep ' t . of Transportation
8:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - 78-1 - Sanitary Sewer Service
b] e
Extension to Cretex Co property (T.H. 101) - Res . No. 1243
r A
Tentative Agenda
April 18 , 1978
Page -2-
c : 30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - 78-2 - Naumkeag, Gorman and
`-- J .E.J . 2nd Addition - Resolution No . 1244
1 1` 9 : 00 P .M. PUBLIC HEARING - 1978 Community Development Program -
__�' Minnesota Street from 4th Avenue south to railroad tracks
e ] Recommendation to Scott County Human Services on the Community
Health Services Plan
f] City Code - Liquor Licenses - Discussion
g] Appointment to Shakopee Recreation Board to fill expired term
h] Dean' s Lake Storm Sewer Assessment - Res . No . 1245
i ] Holmes Street Project -- Ad Hoc Committee
j ] Electronic Election Devices
k] Quarterly Financial Report
11 'Authorize payment of the bills
10. Consent Business :
eement with Shakopee Public Utilities Commission regarding
of CR-83 Watermain
b]
11 . Other Business :
a]
b]
c ]
12 . Adjourn .
Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
I
1
TENTATIVE AGENDA
SHAKOPEE HOU ING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ADJ.REG.MEETING SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APRIL 18 , 1978
Chrm. Lebens presiding
1) Roll Call at 7 : 15 P.M.
2) Approval of Minutes of April 4, 1978.
3) Executive Director ' s Report :
a] Public Housing Application
b] Update on M.H.F.A. new construction
4) Other Business :
5) Adjourn
Nancy Engman
Director
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE
SHAKOPEE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
REGULAR MEETING SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA APRIL 4 , 1978
The meeting was called to order at 7 : 30 P .M. by Chairman Lebens
with Commissioners Leroux, Ward, Reinke , and Hullander present .
Reinke/Hullander moved to approve the Minutes of February 7 , 1978 ,
as kept . Motion carried unanimously.
There was no new business .
Leroux/Reinke moved to adjourn at 7 : 35 P.M. until Tuesday, April 18 ,
1978 , at 7 :15 P .M. Motion carried unanimously.
Nancy Engman
Executive Director
M E M 0
TO: HRA Commissioners
FROM: Nancy Engman, Director
RE: Public Housing Proposals
DATE: April 13, 1978
The Dept . of Housing and Urban Development has funds available
for a public housing program for constrction of three and four
bedroom single family homes . The homes would be constructed by
private developers and sold to the public agency, who in turn rents
them to families qualified under the Section 8 income guidelines .
The families pay one fourth of their gross monthly income toward
the rent . These funds are used to pay for the maintenance and
management of the units . The Federal Government provides the funds
to initially purchase the homes from the developer, and thus , there
are no mortgage payments .
Both the Metropolitan Council and Scott County HRA have approached
me about placing some of these homes in our community on a
scattered site basis . Logically, I think Scott County would be the
better group to go with because they could more closely supervise
the units .
I have attached a map that indicates existing vacant lots that
would be suitable for these homes . There is the possibility that
a duplex could be put on some sites and we could undertake activities
to clear dilapidated homes and make new sites available for the
program.
We do not need to designate the exact locations for the homes at
this point . I merely want to point out that lots do exist and the
program would be workable in our community. The County has offered
us between S and 10 new homes under the program. They will not
receive a funding approval until September, and thus , would not be
constructing the homes until next year .
The County would like to know whether we are interested in par-
ticipating in the program . I think it would be advisable for us
to become involved . There has always been a great demand for
3 and 4 bedroom rental units . The work involved for the City
would be minimal as the County would be the responsible agency.
NE:plk
r Q
a _ �
I
.I
1 .a'
�0-
• n -
1
111 � '. .��,'/ � 1 � t/Nk1e'NS•
i
a;
dbu
� 11
9 u J
4t O'k
1
`
717-71
_ 1S i�
Lu L
M-P-
N ,I
� 11
J
4,
T 1 13A11Vw p l _
�I � m3S,
ccd11���'''111111 ..
I
z 1 , –
1
1 CC -
sr
I
'"" - •--- I
Sul
S3N 70H
'•ni �a ¢ 1
• � G �� 1 C
V —J
at
AT a5 ZS J1IX5'
ILA 4
IN
- - -
i
� 1
5 W
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA APRIL 4 , 1978
Mayor Harbeck called the meeting to order at 7 : 35 P .M. with Cncl .
Leroux, Ward, Reinke , Lebens , and Hullander present.
The Mayor gave a brief invocation .
Hullander/Lebens moved to approve the Minutes of March 21 , 1978 ,
March 23 , 1978 ) and March 28 , 1978 , as kept . Motion carried unan-
imously.
Cncl . Hullander reported to the Council that the School District
will definitely be reducing its contribution to the Recreation
Board in the next budget .
Cncl . Hullander informed the Council that the dues for the League
of Metropolitan Municipalities will be increasing. He also
stated that the Commissioners would be discussing the legislature
wrap-up at their next meeting and that they would be preparing a
report which will be distributed to all the communities .
Cncl . Hullander also reported that he had received several complaints
concerning the garbage pickup , mainly that of damaged garbage cans
and covers being left off. There were also those people whose
garbage had not been picked up .
The City Treasurer stated that he had observed the garbage crew on
the job and that they seemed to be putting the garbage can lids on.
He requested that if any Council members receive calls from citi-
zens whose garbage has not been picked up , that they should call
the City Hall and the garbage will be picked up the next day.
Cncl . Lebens reported that she had received a telephone call from
a Mrs . Schmidt who was concerned about what the City was doing
regarding the sewage fee .
Cncl . Ward also reported receiving telephone calls concerning the
garbage pickup .
Cncl . Ward asked the City Enginerr if he knew whether County Road 16
would be resurfaced. The City Engineer had no knowledge of such
resurfacing , but agreed to investigate the matter and report back
to the Council .
Mayor Harbeck reported that he had attended the County Board of
Commissioners meeting. Discussed at the meeting was the tree
disposal program, bridges , and several proposals for the Human
Services Building.
Mayor Harbeck noted that the new Codification does not include a
Fence Ordinance . Considerable discussion followed concerning the
advantages and disadvantages of requiring a building permit in
order to construct fences .
Mayor Harbeck informed the Council that four of the present CETA
positions will be terminating the end of May. Discussion followed
concerning the possibility of permanently filling the vacating
CETA positions .
Mayor Harbeck asked for comments from the audience - there were none .
Ward/Reinke moved that when the City Council adjourn , it adjourn to
Tuesday, April 11 , 1978 , at 5 : 00 P .M. , recess for dinner, and return
at 7 : 30 P .M. Motion carried unanimously.
Ward/Reinke moved to table the Consulting Engineer' s fee schedule ,
the Eleventh Avenue Storm Sewer , Planning Commission Recommenda-
tions , Resolution No . 1234 , Resolution No . 1228 , Resolution No . 1229 ,
Resolution No. 1235 , Resolution No. 1236 , Ordinance No . 3 , Discussion
of the 1978 Swimming Pool Operation , Report on Riverside Park
Improvements , 1978- 1980 Police Contract , and the Authorization to
Proceedings of the City Council
Page - 2- April 4 , 1978
Enter into an Agreement with the Dog Catcher , until Tuesday , April
11 , 1978 . Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux/Lebens moved to open the Board of Review. Motion carried
unanimously.
The City Adm. explained how the market value , limited value , and
assessed value are determined. He also outlined the duties of
the Board of Review. He explained that the Board will have 21
days to review the assessment and that the persons concerned
would he noti_ Lied of the Board' s decision .
The The following citizens were present and spoke to the Board questioning
their Estimated Market Value:
Werner E. Brown (#2 in 35) - Reinke/Ward moved to table until April 11.
The City Assessor will examine the property. Motion carried unanimously.
F. T. Connolly (##411 in 1) - Ward/Lebens moved to table until April 11.
Mothion carried unanimously.
Tom Ess (#12 in 24) - Leroux/Hullander moved to concur with the City
Assessor ' s recommended value of $73, 765. Motion carried unanimously.
Paul Holtz (#775 in 1) - Ward/Leroux moved to table until April 11. The
City Assessor and Mr. Holtz will meet prior to that date. Motion carried
unanimously.
Alfred P. Jurewiez (#2-' in 27) - Hullander/Lebens moved to concur with
the City Assessor ' s recommended value of $48, 925. Motion carried
unanimously.
Robert G. McCullough (#17 in 29) - Harbeck/Ward moved to table until
April 11 . Motion carried unanimously.
Harry T. Notermann (#18 in 18) - Hullander/Ward moved to concur with the
City Assessor ' s recommended value of $49, 745. Motion carried unanimously.
Michael Pearson (#68 in 4) - Hullander/Leroux moved to table until
April 11 . The City Assessor will examine the property. Motion carried
unanimously.
Don Plekkenpol (#10 in 5) - Hullander/Lebens moved to concur with the
Assessor ' s recommended value of $29, 165. Motion carried unanimously.
Peter Schmidt (#16 in 2) - Ward/Hullander moved to concur with the Assessor
recommended value of $31, 785. Motion carried unanimously.
Harold Schmidt (#13 in 901 & 7 in 3) -Ward/Leroux moved to table until
April 11 . Assessor to examine the property prior to that date. Motion
carried unanimously.
LeRoy Stocker (#1 in 10) - Reinke/Ward moved to concur with the Assessor ' s
recommended value of $51, 280 . Motion carried unanimously.
Wayne Stockman (#20 in 22) - Ward/Lebens moved to table until April 11 .
Motion earried unanimously. Mr. Stockman will meet with the City Assessor
prior to that date to review his IRS income.
Mrs. R.O. Sweeney (#48 in 906) - Hullander Ward moved to table until
April 11 . Motion carried unanimously. The Assessor will examine the propert
Mrs. R.O. Sweeney (#172 in 4) - Ward Leroux moved to concur with the
Assessor ' s recommended value of $30, 800. Motion carried unanimously.
Harris Weinandt (#2 in 930) - Ward/Reinke moved to table until April 11.
Motion carried unanimously.
Proceedings of the City Council
Page - 3- April 4 , 1978
Rubc,:i Wa�s�j�d. l, �r'r'u� i11 12) - Leruux/Reinke uiuv�'d t., t.:ble until April 11 .
Motion carried unanimously. The City Assessor will examine the property.
Billy White (#20 in 33) - Ward/Reinke moved to concur with the Assessor ' s
recommended value of $56,830. Motion carried unanimously.
The following persons attended the Council meeting and also had questions
concerning their property values. The Board could not make decisions
since they did not have any background information, but will do so at the
April 11th meeting:
Mr. Jahns, Rebuen Patrikus, Doris Dunlop, Paul Johnson, George Valek
and Walter Muhlenhardt.
Ward/Leroux moved to continue the Board of Review Lentil April 11 .
Motion carried unanimously.
Reinke/Leroux moved for a five minute recess at 10 : 30 P .M. Motion
carried unanimously.
Hullander/Lebens moved to reconvene at 10 : 43 P .M. Motion carried
unanimously.
Ward/Leroux moved to continue the public hearing on
the 78- 1 Improvement Program. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. William Price , from Suburban Engineering, presented an additional
supplement to the study on the proposed water main. Considerable
discussion followed concerning the proposed sanitary sewer and
trunk and lateral sewer costs .
Ward/Hullander moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried
unanimously.
Ward/Hullander offered Resolution No. 1223 , A Resolution Ordering
Improvement and Preparation of Plans , and moved its adoption . The
City Adm. read the Resolution . Motion carried unanimously.
Cncl . Ward requested that a special assessment policy be prepared. The
City Adm. informed the Council that a rough draft of an Assessment
Policy Manual would be brought before the Council in May.
The City Adm. made a presentation of two options for the restriction
of further residential subdivisions in Shakopee . One plan called
for a "Ten Acre Policy" which would increase the minimum lot sizes
in unsewered areas from 2 . 5 acres to 10 acres and the other option
consisted of a moratorium which would prohibit any platting of
unsewered areas until the Comprehensive Development Plan is adopted.
Several residents were present and spoke against both options .
Considerable discussion followed concerning the need for any restric-
tive policy.
Ward/Leroux moved to table Ordinance No . 2 until April 11 ,
1978 . Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux/Ward offered Resolution No . 1230 , A Resolution Ordering the
Preparation of a Report on Improvement , and moved its adoption .
The City Adm. summarized the resolutionMotion carried unanimously.
Leroux/Hullander offered Resolution No . 1231 , A Resolution Receiving
a Report and Calling a Hearing on Improvement , and moved its adoption .
The City Adm.summarized the resolution. Motion carried unanimously .
Ward/Hullander moved to table Resolution No . 1232 , A Resolution
Receiving a Report and Calling a Hearing on Improvement 78- 3 .
Motion carried unanimously.
Ward/Leroux offered Resolution No. 1233 , A Resolution to Initiate
the Vacation of an Easement in Eaglewood 3rd Addition, and moved
its adoption . The City Adm. explained the resolution. Motion
carried unanimously.
ti
Proceedings of the City Council
Page -4- April 4 , 1978
Ward/Leroux moved to authorize the purchase of fire equipment in
the following amounts :
a) $3 , 126. 00 from Conway Fire and Safety
b) $2 , 771 . 00 from Akins Fire Equipment
c) $392 . 00 from Metropolitan Fire Equipment
Roll Call : Ayes - unanimous Noes - none Motion carried.
Leroux/Reinke moved to authorize the advertising for bids for the
tennis courts . Motion carried unanimously with Cncl . Ward abstaining .
Leroux/Reinke moved to set a hearing for the 1978 CD Program
for April 18 , 1978 , at 9 : 00 P.M. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Treasurer explained to the Council that a new rate struc-
ture will be proposed for the 1978 Swimming Pool Operation.
Leroux/Reinke moved to adjourn at 12 : 55 A.M. until Tuesday, April 11 ,
1978 , at 5 : 00 P .M. Motion carried unanimously.
Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
WENDELL R. ANDERSON '
MINNESOTA
1;
A I 'Zs 1 CrtiYf e� z of es Zenaf e
WASHINGTON,D.C. 20510 ��
"Fc- ..
c I y
April 5 , 1978
Mr. Douglas S . Reeder
City Administrator
129 E. First Avenue
Shakopee , MN 55379
Dear Mr. Reeder:
Thank you for your letter to my office urging my
support for H .R. 637 .
At this time , the bill is in the subcommittee on
Communications in the House of Representatives; a companion
bill has not been introduced in the Senate. At such time ,
I assure you I shall keep your comments in mind.
I would like to suggest that your daytime radio
station file an application for nighttime transmission with
the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in Washington,
D.C. I was advised by the FCC that such an application
should include an interference study. The FCC suggested
you contact your consultant engineer in the event you should
wish to file an application.
If I can be of assistance in this or other matters
in the future , please let me know.
Best wishes.
Sincerely,
414auvcr" 6L'/��
Wendell R. Anderson
WRA:kj : s
`I
NOTICE OF HEARING ON
PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 78-1
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of
Shakopee will meet in the Council Chambers of the City at 8:00 P.M. ,
or thereafter, on the 18th day of April , 1978 to consider the making of
the improvements hereinafter described, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes ,
Sections 429.011 to 429. 111 , and that the estimated cost of each
improvement follows the description thereof :
Southern part of Highway 101 right-of-way from a point 600 feet
west of the centerline of Shiely' s private road to Shiely' s
private road, thence southerly 900 feet from Highway 101
right-of-way along the right-of-way of Shiely' s private road,
thence easterly approximately 1320 feet from the centerline
of Shiely' s private road - Trunk Sanitary Sewer
Total estimated cost of said improvement - $146 , 230. 00
The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is part
of the South one-half of Section 2 and part of the North one-half of
Section 11 , all lying within Township 115 , Range 22 , Scott County,
Minnesota .
Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed
improvement will be heard at this meeting.
Dated this 31st day of March, 1978.
Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Y
111!!!/ ��✓
NOTICE OF HEARING ON
PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT 78-2
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of
Shakopee will meet in the Council Chambers of the City at 8: 30 P.M.
on the 18th day of April , 1978 to consider the making of the improve-
ments hereinafter described, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes , Sections
429.011 to 429. 111 , and that the estimated cost of each improvement
follows the description thereof :
Naumkeag Street from 1st Avenue to Bluff Avenue - Watermain,
Curb, Gutter , and Bituminous Surfacing - $30, 300. 00
Gorman Street from 4th Avenue to Marschall Road - Watermain,
Storm Sewer , Curb, Gutter , and Bituminous Surfacing - $177 , 400. 00
J .E.J . 2nd Addition - all streets contained therein - Curb, Gutter,
Bituminous Surfacing and Sidewalks - $75 ,480.00
Total estimated cost of said improvements - $283 , 280,000
The area proposed to be assessed for such improvements is : East
Shakopee Plat : B23 , L6 ; B24, L5&6 ; B31 , L1 &L8-10 incl . ; B32 , L1-3
incl . , and part of Government Lots 4 and 5 in Section 6-115-22. J.E.J.
2nd Add 'n. : Blocks 1 and 2, and part of section 8, township 115 , range
22 lying East of Austin Street , West of the Chicago, Milwaukee , St . Paul
and Pacific Railroad, and immediately adjacent to J. E.J. 2nd Addition.
Part of the property lying within the South one-half of Section 6-115-22 . .
Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed
improvements will be heard at this meeting.
Dated this 31st day of March, 1978.
Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
,;Main Office 571-6066
6875 Highway No. 65 N. E.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432
INC.
0 l !?'!!, '41ur,itr xc' .ti r South Office 896--6510
VmvmnmrnN/ LWOW= 1101 CHU Road
��-
Land Sunvym; (,aarl Pti,tisville, Nlinricsota 55337
March 29 ,1978
REPORT
GOR"AN STREET
TO: City of Shakopee
SIbu'i-ban Engireering,Inc.
KNECT: 1970 improvement - Gorman Street from 4th Ave. to CSAH #17
�Suppler,-.anl. to report 3/16/73)
'.10 AW estimated the cost of Wrovinq Sorman Street
on the prasant alignment as compared with the Report of 3/16/78
Ynich srzoscd rzalimmint of Gorman Street to intersect with
Kim0a; at fth Avenue.
02 total Vartn of tne projz= cons idared in the first study with
t4a =1010 is abouz ( 13) ten feet longer than the
'cot Math folloaing the existinn ali ;nmient. The dii'l.er-2nce in
as Yztnd cost for this difference in length is notconsidered sign-
if,cAt and t0refora the costs used for March 16th Report should
A wSof for either alignment.
02 PrNact is Nasible �,%'i tlout t:ia realiment but it is recommend-
e! that ; utu-a Plans should consider correcting the undesirable
KKK in the intapsections of norman and Naumkeag Streets at 4th
Annue.
RaspacEfully submitted,
slounK 10&WEE RVH�-Jljj \NC.
Jiliam E. Price, P. E.
jFP/lh
t
M E M O
0/
To: Douglas S. Reeder, Administrator
From: Nancy Engman, Administrative Assistant
Subject: Community Development Public Hearing
Date: April 13, 1978
The regulations have been finalized governing the 1978 Community
Development Program. There is only 3.4 million dollars available
to fund competing communities in the Metropolitan area.
I have previously reviewed with you the two separate categories
in which we can apply for funds. The first category is "single
purpose" activities which are similar to projects we have done
in the past. Only 1.2 million of the total 3.4 million in funds
will be reserved for applications that are made in this category.
The remaining 2 .2 million in funding will be reserved for the second
program category called the "comprehensive program".
It was evident at the HUD conference I attended, that many more
communities were interested in the single purpose program category.
This reinforces my first impression that the comprehensive program
is the area in which we should be competing for funds. I do feel,
however, that even in this category our chances for funding will
be more difficult than in previous years. We will be competing
with a larger number of communities and many of them will receive
preference over us because of their former participation in the
old Federal categorical grant programs.
The project activities as I presented are virtually unchanged. I
have attached a copy of the proposed subdivision for the area and
have forwarded it to the Department of Housing and Urban Development
for a determination of its feasibility for 235 home construction.
I expect a response before the hearing on Tuesday evening.
A review of the proposed subdivision indicates that portions of
property owned by two additional homeowners would need to be
acquired to achieve the desired layout of lots. I have sent
letters to these property owners inviting them to the public
hearing.
At this point, it appears that the total package can be put together
and submitted to HUD prior to the May 15th deadline. The only
problem I foresee is that there will be some debate at HUD as to
whether or not our project is a comprehensive program. The
Page 2
April 13, 1978
definition allows for much subjective judgment on their part.
If we are put into the single purpose category we would be
asking for approximately half of the total money that ' s available
to the Metro area. I think this would be an unfavorable position
to be in.
A final point for consideration is that we can become part of the
Scott County HRH' s application if we choose. They will be asking
for approximately $400,000 to establish a rehabilitation grant
program throughout the County. In my opinion the chances for
funding are good because the project will rank high and the County
has not been funded previously. We would have to execute a coop-
erative agreement with them to become a part of that application.
In my opinion if HUD feels the subdivision is feasible for 235
housing, we should proceed on our own and try to make a case for a
comprehensive program. Although reactions in the surrounding
neighborhood are mixed regarding the project, I have received many
inquiries from residents who wish to purchase the new homes. I
think the completed project would be an asset to that area, and
would perhaps prompt private developers to continue to work on the
surrounding properties.
After the close of the public hearing Tuesday evening, we should
decide on a project and authorize submission of the preliminary
application.
NE:pk
�J I
�� �a-�c.r�G.�a� � ,c. 1 O �� w\ b► \ti a i ,;. o„c .� � - ..I h
T�.• s . s nccJcJ �o .
11v\8a.c� � IIL
clay �. \01 Co.— ,a.r \ �S t�ctala� a�cto�i �hc
,»
ooh
bock c \o�♦ \� � , o.t\ Y ar8 daLw«.. Ab 0-4%4D
M
h`-'h, �O tC[Y�C4 orb 4t fl\a� �n� QVCA \m 4
L �OWtr \�hC. t
�h� �ac..•/•n "1O �V �a•�ti OpGt\ft,K� a�acA v �4
z
10< hazy 49 'pa\Wain to a^V
t
�� 0.r. accpai A VO 1 � `� � %o�
Olr� he c•,01 a.n8 L, �p o�. ant_ %,a
S�tcat
�,.. .b1�h �, LkO ' w .1� cw�jl.v.� .. C�►1 $� i4c. ,
i
o.-i
1.0� 5 IL V.
o� ��o �. �0 %0604
\Q ja00 agw..ct
\Z.o 00
La o �• \z.o lolaou
L o} ` !. ��0. I S DO S
1.01 a `CO Y.\yU 12%A 00
�-01 Ot go x \tea 12Voc� ZS �,�r,,c c
i
t.ot 1�j go +. N�a �2•l.0o s��.�.�c � �
1-pt \\
jr
�t)
X800 �1
N
Nnn
r..n
NV r
a
t '
w
f f
y
t -
�c M
-
Ir Jr,
� � - -
T
4 _
M E M 0
TO: Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: Nancy Engman, Administrative Assistant
RE: Final Recommendations regarding the structuring of
Scott County Health Services .
DATE: April 13 , 1978
Richard Howard was present at the February 21st meeting of the City
Council to explain the alternatives being discussed as a bases for
implementing Community health services in Scott County. At that time
the City Council chose to postpone any reactions to the plan until
position papers were completed in all four of the following areas :
a) Health Officer Structure
b) Uniform Health Ordinances
c) Environmental Health Services
d) Disease Control in Scott County
All papers are now complete and the final meeting of the subcommittee
is scheduled for April 19th. At that time a decision will be made on
what recommendations should be sent to the Human Services Board . If
the City has any comments , they must be forwarded to the subcommittee
at that final meeting .
I have attached summaries of alternative methods of structuring
in all four of the areas studied . In every area the alternatives
provide for either a centralized county structure , a county munici-
pality shared structure, or a decentralized structure with more of
the costs falling on the municipalities .
As I have stated previously, I feel the recommendation of the City
should be to centralize the implementation of Community Health Services
at the County level . The specific services the County anticipates
getting involved in include :
a) food protection
b) ;pater supply sanitation
c) wastewater disposal
d) general nuisance control
e) environmental health education
f) disease control in Scott County
In all of these areas the City has been receiving the services from
the Minn. Dept . of Health. We are discussing a transfer of this
authority from one outside agency to another, and not discussing re-
moving any existing programs from the City.
M E M 0 Page 2
I want to emphasize that the County is looking for a policy
direction from the cities on what role they wish to play in
implementing these programs . The structuring, and level of service
to be provided is the responsibility and authority of the County by
virtue of the Community Health Services Act .
It has been my understanding that the City' s disagreement in this
area has been with this basic transfer of responsibility for providing
services from the State Health Dept . to the County. I want to re-
emphasize that they are not asking our reaction to this transfer - it
has already taken place .
The County is asking us what role we want to play in providing the
services they have taken from the State . I do not recommend our
getting involved in the programs . I think it should be centralized
at the County.
NE/ji
Attachments
You- reed . -+-hi s oVI 2-zM-1
ALTERNATIVE HEALTH OFFICER STRUCTURES FOR SCOTT COUNTY:
The following are two alternatives which may be developed to meet Scott
County' s present and future needs for a health officer structure under the
Community Health Services Act. For each of the alternatives listed, a des-
cription has been provided, the advantages and disadvantages listed and the
effect of the structure on future program development is defined.
ALTERNATIVE 1: COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER ONLY
Description
Under this structure, the municipalities of Scott County would no longer
need to hire a health officer. the powers of all the local (municipal) health
Officers would be consolidated into the County Health Officer. Thus, the
County Health Officer would have the following basic duties for the entire county:
- make investigation and provide reports on communicable disease as
directed by the State Board (Department) of Health (M.S.A. 145.03);
- enforce all laws and regulations on public health (M.S.A. 145.03);
- have right of entry for health inspection of buildings, conveyances,
or places where contagions, infection, filth or other cause of
preventable disease exists or is reasonably suspected (M.S.A.' 145.04);
- employ medical help to control communicable disease (M.S.A, 14 -05).
Please note that public health personnel could be hired to assist the
County Health Officer in fulfilling these duties.
Advantages
1• Efficiency could be increased with only one health officer coordinating
and functioning instead of numerous health officers duplicating the
same function.
2. Costs to the municipalities would be reduced as only one health officer
would be paid and public health professionals would be hired by the
County.
3. A more active role would be given to the County Health Officer.
Disadvantages
1. The needs of the municipalities for a local health officer may not be
met as efficiently.
2. Additional public health personnel probably would have to be hired
by the county to act as agents of the County Health Officer. Additional,
costs would be incurred by the County to provide personnel as needed.
Effect on Future Pro ,ram Development
This alternative of counsolidating the health officer structure at the
County revel could hasten the development of uniform standards or procedures
�^ throughout the County. This is and should be the goal of any local public
health program or department i.e. , to develop a uniform system of managing
public health problems throughout the area within their jurisdiction. With
health powers consolidated at the County level this could be accomplished
quite efficiently. However, such development may hinder the future (10-15
years) development of city health departments in those municipalities that
would have sufficient population size to do so.
«AL„TERNAT� VF_ COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER AND APPOINTED
DEPUTY MUNICIPAL HEALTH OFFICERS
Description
This structure would provide a network or system approach to health officer
needs for County residents. The municipalities of Scott County would appoint
a local health officer for their community much as they do now. However, the
municipal health officer would become a Deputy Health Officer to the County
Health-Officer:--This-De ricer would continue to function as the
local- MUn1rtp6-T _1WAa1tTi--off_icer-but-w6u report_tO_ h _Xu _ hGF"" as
well.--The CQUnty Health officer-Jetnuld repor— ' and F ovt�tP .�o�t�a� guidance
to the County Health_ Board. The -Go Health
Officers would have the same basic duties as described in Altepna-true--&1- above.
Advantages
1. Would meet the needs of the local municipalities for a local health
officer.
2. Would provide better structure and accountability to the. undefined
public health structure which currently exists for Scott County.
3. A better system of reporting problems or disease outbreaks could be
established.
4. May. require less professional public health staff being hired to act
as agents for the County -He-attic off jeep. - -- -- - -- -- -
Disadvantages
1. The need to communicate with more health officers for decision-making
may reduce the efficiency of such a system.
2. Fragmentation and/or duplication of responsibilities may continue to
occur.
Effect on Future Program Development
This alternative would probably contribute to slow the development of a
uniform public health standards or procedures throughout Scott County. It would
require considerable more work and staff hours to develop such a system since all
the local health officers should be involved. However, this would provide greater
certainty that the municipalities were actively involved in public health program
development. It would also maintain the option for the municipalities to develop
city health departments in the future if the population growth' would justify it.
n ,
CYou recd . -�h�s o� 2• � � - ��',
ALTERNATIVE 1 : CENTRALIZED COWTY HEALTH ORDINANCE DEVELOPMENT
Description
Under this model , the Scott County Board of Health (Human Services Board) would
develop a comprehensive set of environmental health ordinances and related health
ordinances of a specific and possibly stringent nature. The Human Services Board
as a Board of Health would assume the role of primacy in carrying out the educational,
inspectional , and enforcement activities of these ordinances. Under this centralized
alternative a fairly comprehensive program could be developed. The County Board of
Health would assume delegated authority from the State Department of Health for such
functions as well water code enforcement, wastewater or sewage disposal control,
public accomodations control (food, beverage and lodging establishments), and com-
municable disease control. Additionally, the County Board of Health would develop a
general nuisance control program to be adopted by the municipalities. The ordinances
developed would be stringent enough that adoption of stronger ordinances by the
municipalities would serve no purpose since they would not have the personnel to
enforce them.
This centralized system would probably utilize only the single county health
officer. It would not be impossible however to adopt the deputy health officer concept
(see position paper #1) to this alternative of ordinance development.
The estimated cost to Scott County Human Services of this approach of ordinance
and program development would be in the neighborhood of $252,000 to $30,000 per year
for at least the first five years. The costs would primarily be incurred from
hiring additional personnel and some technical equipment. Costs would be covered by
the Com=unity Health Service subsidy monies.
Advantages
1 . Efficiency and cost effectiveness could be realized as control would be
centralized at the County level. Administrative costs could be minimized
and more effort could be placed in direct service. The system of ordinance
development and program development would be simplified.
2. Costs would be recovered totally by Scott County Human Services through the
Community Health Services subsidy and possibly a licensing fee system.
3. The municipalities would not need to hire a health officer and the County
would be responsible to manage and carry out the health ordinances. The
municipalities would gain an additional local resource to assist them in
managing health problems.
Disadvantages
1. From the municipalities viewpoint, the County would assume a leadership
role in developing ordinances or regulations.
2. Additional costs would be incurred by the County Human Services Board to
develop, adopt, and carry out ordinances. If the Community Health Services
subsidy were cut, the County would have to pick up the costs.
ALTERNATIVE 2: COUNTY-CITY COOPERATIVE HEALTH ORDINANCE DEVELOPMENT
Description
In this alternative, compared to the previous one, the County Board of Health
(Human Services Board) would take a lessened leadership role in developing
Ienvironmental health and other health ordinances. The ordinances that were developed
would be less comprehensive and less stringent than a centralized program. The
County Board of Health would assume the minimatedelegateoder grams from to State
Department of Health based upon need, e.g• ,
accomodations control and communicable disease control. General nuisance controlThe
and control of other health problems would be the responsibility of the cities.
County Board of Health and its agents
offer
cities in special problems. The c ities
health nuisances and could, at their discretion, adopt ordinances more stringent than
the County' s (see Appendix 0.
Under this alternative, the deputy health officers would be required (see
Alternative 2 - Position Paper ##0 to maintain the d cities involvement in management
of public health problems by adopting their
An estimated cost to Scott County Human Services for this approach year ordinance
and program development would be approximately $13,000 to $15 9000 per y as only half time personnel may be needed.Community County
reddby
would be reimbursed through the Y Health Service
the municipalities may be partially reimbursed by Scott County Human Services.
Advantages
1. From the municipalities viewpoint, there would be greater involvement by the
cities and townships in ordinance development and public health management.
2. Better communication and cooperation may be developed between the County and the
municipalities.
3. The potential for developing future municipal health departments would exist as
the population increases.
D is_advanta es
1. Overall cost effectives compared to
adman #1
trative more
financial resources (taxpayer's
costs for both County and municipality.
2. Uniformity of ordinances would be more difficult to attain since the County
would develop parts of tneeded e ordinances
desired.regulations
Fragmentation of regulatory the municipalities
regulatoryresponsi-
would develop others as
bilities would undoubtedly occur.
ALTERNATIVE 3: DECENTRALIZED COUNTY - STRONG MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT OF ORDINANCES
Description
The ultimate goal of ordinance and program development under this alternative
ty
would be to form a strong city
mcouldccontractt foreservices.frThishalternativenwould
and/or other municipal governments
give the Scott County Board of Health the weakest role in direct service provision
but it still would maintain control over Community Health Service dollars that
would become part of the public health effort. This alternative of regulatory
cooperation and program development is exemplified by Blue Earth and Clay Counties
here in Minnesota. The county contracts with the Mankato (Blue Earth) and Moorhead
(Clay) municipal health departments for services to the county board of health.
Also, a number of municipalities may form Joint
powers
services, develop ordinances that are stronger than the aCountenss hirecoMIM health
purchase equipment to provide environmental health or other health services. Scott
d
County Human Services and the HSB as a Board of Health would adopt the needed
ordinances, supply some funding through the Community Health Services subsid
for program development and contract for services from the municipal(s) health moni-
department.
Under this alternative, deputy health officers would be required (see Alternative
2 - Position Paper #1) since the municipalities would have the greatest role in
managing environmental health or other health services.
Costs to Scott County Human Services would probably be substantial during the
first five years for program development and assistance to the municipalities. A
rough estimate may be approximately $40,000 to $500000 per
year.
program development, the municipalities would probably pick upmostfofrtheicosts.
Advantages
1. From the municipal perspective, program and ordinance development would be
controlled to a greater extent by them. Ordinance development and program
management would be at its most local level.
2• From the County's perspective, future costs for environmental and other
community health services would be reduced as municipalities would take a
greater leadership role.
Disadvantages
1. This system of community health services would be fragmented and he
less than uniform ordinance development. nce result in
2. Cost-effectiveness may be reduced since administrative costs to both the County
and the municipalities would increase.
3. Ordinance development would be complex.
vos:+;&w% ?a.Qe r 3
ALTER.NA`T'IVE METHODS FOR PROVIDING EI\1VlR0i,tijiEIN`['AL HEALTH SERVICES
Alternative MethodsThe*` o-re, 4he. e-vivIr-an-
V%ev%+*_V areas Scc}+ Ceuh+3 wa64t5 +o
gWt 'Involued 'tn .
Centralized County-Municipality Decentralized
County
scription County Assumes County and municipalities Municipalities asE
responsibility develop agreements on joint responsibility for
for program responsibilities, program developmer
development. (Cities form joint
powers agreements)
rvices Authority dele Authority delegated from Authority delegate
Food gated from MDH MDH to county. from MDH to county
Protection to county. municipal health
icensing and department. .
spection of County would contr
od estabmts. for services.
ter Supply Authority dele Authority delegated from Authority delegate
nit a_tion gated from MDH MDH to county. from MDH to county
lan review, to county. municipal health
suance of department.
rmits and County would contr
spection of for services.
yr wells) .
stewater Authority dele Authority delegated from Authority delegate
sposal (Plan gated from MDH MDH to county. Activity from MDH to county
view, issu- to county. coordinated with existing municipal health
ce of permits Activity coord programs. department.
d inspection inated with County would contr
systems) . existing pro- for services.
neral Nuis- County would County would assist munic- Authority delegate
ce Control. assist munici- ipalities in developing from MDH to county
omplaint in- palities in general nuisance control municipal health
stigationsor developing gen program. Costs borne prim- department,
isances, rod- eral nuisance arily by cities and muni- County would contr
ts, animals, cont. prog. hosts cipalities. for services.
rik, etc. ) . borne by county.
viron. Healtr Provided by Provided by county environ- Municipalities wou
izcatio.a county envir- mental health personnel. determine size and
orkshops, onmental health Costs borne by the munici- scope of program
esentations personnel. palities. development. Cost
governmental Cost borne by borne by the muni-
d community county. cipalities.
pups; train-
for in-
7!cto rs and
ctrl gov.
f icials) .
rsonnel for 1 full time 1 time to full time sani- 1 full time sani-
t few years sanitarian or tarian or envirorunental tarian or environ-
environmental health specialist. mental health spec:
health :,pecial. a-1 i st.
l :>t,
ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR PROVIDING DISEASE PREVENTION ANVONTftl, cr
: These pe'ocS -4w 1%V0 uts : ► Cawt►r►wus Ur Valk (thc� • coMwY.►ital.t:
►states awil t) Mow►e►9ev►."A o4 d�seasa oo}b�tc�.fcs .
The following are three alternative models which could be
utilized to develop a Disease Preventipn and Control Program for
Scott County. These alternative methods can be defined as
Centralized, Decentralized, and County-Municipality Sharing.
Alternative 1: Centralized County
Under this structure, the county would assume the responsi-
bility for program development. The surveillance component of
this program could only be carried out under this centrallized
structure, since this is one of the stipulations of the National
Immunization Initiative. The County Health Officer and his
designated agents would be responsible for the investigation and
reporting of communicable diseases as directed by the State
• Board of Health (M.S.A . 145.03 ) . All private physicians would
be responsible for reporting any communicable disease to the
County Health Officer and designated agents who would then report
these diseases to the state health department.
Management of disease outbreaks could be carried out under
any one of the three alternative structures. Under the central-
ized structure the county would be responsible for program
development, implementation of the program, and the hiring of
personnel.
The estimated cost for the program (1st year) under all 4 F«
three structures would be in the range of $129 000--$15, 000
(participation in the National Immunization Initiative accounts
for $11,000) with the county covering 100f of the costs.
required for this program would be a Personnel
and a -k time sanitarian, time public health nurse
Alternative 2: County-Municipality Sharing
Under this structure the county and municipalities would
develope agreements on joint responsibilities. The county may
delegate powQrs to the municipalities for those municipalities
wanting to develope and implement their own programs.
The estimated cost for the pro ram (1st year) under this
structure would be in the range of 12,000-$15,000 with the county
providing 60% of the costs and the municipality
required for this program would be a p public Personnel
and a J time sanitarian at the county level, municipalities would
secure their own personnel-probably a local health officer.
Alternative 3: Decentralized
Under this structure, the municipality assumes the responsi-
bility for program development and implementation. The munici-
pality would form its own health department and the county
would delegate authority to the municipal health department. The
municipality must secure its own qualified personnel.
The estimated cost for the pro ram (1st year) under this
structure would be in the range of 12, 000-$15,000 with the county
providing 40, of the costs and the municipality 60%. Personnel
required for this program may be a J time public health nurse
and a i time sanitarian at the county level, the municipality
must -hire its own health officer or othe- . Ua?;_::-.ec t•esonnel.
October 1L, 1y77
City Administrator
City of ahakopee
14' 9 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota
Dear air,
This brief resume is intended to summarize my background for con-
sideration for an appoint:aent to the ahakopee Recreation Board.
For the last seven and one-half years I have liven and workea in
ahakopee and presently am employed as a family practice physician at
the Shakopee Medical Center. In the past, ray wife, Joan and I have
particiapted in several community affairs. !Mine include the Jaycee's
and the Parent-Teacher Council at dweeney Elementary School. Joan's
activities are much more extensive.
We both have particiapted in softball, volleyball and tennis and
recognize this as an important part of the quality of life in ahakopee.
Our children are now old enough to start participation in the many
varied recreational programs that 6hakopee has to offer. We both feel
th::t particiapation in community activities and organizations is an
integral part of our lives and plan to continue to work on community
projects.
I feel qualified for the Recreation Board. I favor no special
sport or activity and represent only my own feelings toward organization
of a community recreational program. I have working knowledLe of most
common sports having played football, basketball, track and baseball in
high school and have played intramural sports in college.
Thank-you for your consideration.
Jincerely,
Donald K. Lynch
r
9 �
M E M 0
TO: Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: Chester J. Harrison, City Engineer
RE: Dean' s Lake Storm Sewer Assessment
DATE: April 13, 1978
I have studied the assessment very carefully. The following inform-
ation is relative to this matter :
I . I had an Abstract check made on this property to
verify property lines and ownership .
2 . Mr . Bill Smokel (County Surveyor) took the abstract
information and verified the data on the county
quarter section maps .
3 . Everything has been completed to my satisifaction
at this time .
Conclusions
1 . There are thirteen lots on this plat map . I believe
that two of these lots are unbuildable because of
the relative elevation to the Lake and the soil types
(organic) that lay over the surface of the land .
2 . I recommend assessing 11 lots at a cost of $_ 816 .05
per lot based on a total construction cost of
$_ 8,976 .50
Please review the attached map . If you have any questions please
contact me .
The assessment hearing should be set for May 16, 1978 .
CJH/ji
Attachments
iv L LA If
14t� , ORE L Nt ALRIAI- FHOTO
DATED AU GUST 1957
N THE NW CGkNLk OF GUV T_ 5 d NE k_GF SEC 15
I �
a b�t
b 52 99E AC \ .
HARLES GRIFF IN
129795 w \
W
- Wa _ 1 ncr � Ca � r 4•
f s cc �', ;' cD �n n m W
QD
O
i N� I 4 J ,7/ �
cr a1
lh (7 7 �
W
c) �� Q
f O v7 w I _ _ Q
N I i I
w i -1 1 cr
n j W
� t \ •T
I N 'y� N
I•, ' `� �" /y: ,.v `t �,ZJ►f'' - T l0 N It
Fi, J.lrcl I V) N IN1 (n r; (!)T W
x ?99EAA
n r-
4 I� v CONNIE
ORGEMANN
�
121801 1
92
c' ! �; 337.09
j oal C� p 0) L C. PARK '—
$
�? W f v ,,,LE .O
u 1
S' 99D E 5 q
1 m c HOWARD BORCHARDT
ii
L Inc' 118827 Gl
N
<
----- -- I_- o
2
1 t::
J W
._ O
CK
i Z I
!
MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Holmes Street Project
DATE : April 13, 1978
The Council should discuss again the formation of a committee
to consider the Holmes Street Project .
The attached outline of that Committee was prepared by Mayor
Harbeck. I may have some suggestions for changes at the Council
Meeting.
DSR/jsc
Holmes Street Project
Ad Hoc Committee
12 Participants
Area
River to 10th Avenue
Scott Street to Spencer
should area be larger or smaller
Projects to be Considered
Streets and curb & gutter
Sanitary sewer
Watermains
Storm sewer system
Sidewalk & trees
Areas of Funding
Each project
In put From
City Staff
Consultant engineer
Length of Study
Time
Project Start Up
Time
WCH/jsc
Mar . , 1978
MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder
RE: Electronic Election Devices
DATE: April 13 , 1978
Following the last election, the City Council directed me to
investigate the purchase of automatic voting machines . I have done
this and would like to discuss the possible inclusion of funds in
the Capital Improvement Fund, (when that is revised) for the purchase
of machines for the 1979 election.
Attached is some background material .
DSR/jsc
CES EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
Quantity Description Unit Price Total Price
29 Model III-A Votomatics with $ 300 . 00 $ 8 , 700 . 00
Self-Contained Booths
4 Votomatic Demonstrators 60 . 00 240 . 00
4 Transfer Cases 17 . 50 70 . 00
2 Precinct Ballot Counters 1 , 850 . 00 3 , 700 . 00
1 Manual Crimper 185. 00 185 . 00
1 Single Row Mask Punch 925 . 00 95 . 00
1 Ballot Assembly Aid 150 . 00 150 . 00
TOTAL $13 , 970 . 00
Start up supplies and ballot cards for the 1978 elections will be
approximately $1,000.00.
F.O.B. , Berkeley , California, r!
The above prices are firm until March 31 , 1978 .
J�� ��,�T•P n/ n
{
t
IF
COMPUTER ELECTION SYSTEMS 7300 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55435(61 2) B31-586B
March 10 , 1978
Mr. Doug Reeder
City of Shakopee
Mr. Michael McGuire
City of Prior Lake
Mr . Thomas Markus
City of Savage
Gentlemen :
You will find, attached, the pertinent data that will help
you and your Councils decide to go to the CES Punch Card
Voting System.
The advantage of joint purchase of CES equipment is that
assembly equipment can be shared and the quantity price
break for Votomatics would be less per unit .
There are 37 states presently using the Punch Card System,
with over thirty communities in the State of Minnesota.
In the 1976 General Election , approximately 20% of the
total national vote used the Punch Card System. Speci-
fically , Shakopee, Prior Lake, and Savage would benefit by
using the CES Votomatic System because :
Less work will be required from the precinct
workers , recruiting minimized.
Computerized results will be faster and more
accurate than ever before .
Elimination of tally crews .
Enthusiastic acceptance by voters .
Low investment and operating costs .
r
Mr. Doug Reeder - 2 - March 10 , 1978
Mr. Michael McGuire
Mr . Thomas Markus
. Cost savings in subsequent elections .
In addition , the Votomatics are simple to use . Various
studies have shown that voters , both young and old, prefer
the Votomatic to any other system of voting .
If there are any questions , please feel free to contact me
at : (612) 831-5868 .
Very truly yours ,
COMPUTER ELECTION SYSTEMS
William G. Nelson
Sales Representative
ep
Attachments
cc : T. C. Barnes
CES
1001 Eastshore Highway
Berkeley , California 94710
D. G. Crosgrove
Box 838 , R.F.D. #1
Heber City , Utah 84032
J
CES EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Quantity Description Unit Price Total Price
(Shakopee, Minnesota)
29 Model III-A Votomatics with $ 285. 00 $ 8 , 265. 00
Self-Contained Booths
4 Votomatic Demonstrators 60.00 240 .00
4 Transfer Cases 17 . 50 70.00
2 Precinct Ballot Counters 1 , 850. 00 3 , 700.00
TOTAL $12 ,275. 00
(Prior Lake , Minnesota)
16 Model III-A Votomatics with $ 285.00 $ 4 ,560. 00
Self-Contained Booths
2 Votomatic Demonstrators 60. 00 120. 00
2 Transfer Cases 17 . 50 35. 00
2 Precinct Ballot Counters 1 , 850. 00 3 ,700.00
TOTAL $ 8 ,415.00
(Savage, Minnesota)
10 Model III-A Votomatics with $ 285 . 00 $ 2 , 850.00
Self-Contained Booths
1 Votomatic Demonstrator 60. 00 60. 00
1 Transfer Case 17. 50 17. 50
1 Precinct Ballot Counter 1 , 850. 00 1 ,850. 00
TOTAL $ 4 , 777. 50
COMPUTER ELECTION SYSTEMS 7300 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55435[61 2l 631-5866
ASSEMBLY EQUIPMENT - SHARED
CO2 Crimper $1 ,280.00
Single Row Mask Punch 925. 00
Ballot Assembly Aid 150 .00
$2, 355.00
F.O.B . , Berkeley , California.
The above prices are firm until
March 31 , 1978 .
COMPUTER ELECTION SYSTEMS 7300 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435(61 2l 831 5868
1978 GENERAL FUND BUDGET
Expenditures by Department as of March 31 , 1978
DEPARTMENI MAI.. EXPEND. 1978 BUDGET YR. TO DATE %
Mayor and Council 13249 . 30 20, 763 4, 105 .09 19 . 8
Administration 8 ,062 . 13 865851 20,087 .05 23 . 1
Elections 49.46 25200 923 . 99 42 .0
Assessor 3 ,408. 24 43 , 0142 11 , 301 .66 25
Finance 8 , 732 . 13 59,047 16,095 . 99 ICZD
Legal Counsel 3 , 864. 33 25 , 300 8 , 304.49 =8
Planning Commission 681 . 75 41 ,000 4, 940. 75 12 . 1
Govt . Bldgs. 2 ,806 . 59 48,418 11 , 821 . 74 24 . 4
Police/School Liaison 1 , 539 . 80 22 ,491 43447 . 67 19 . 8
Police 25 ,919. 77 3653845 89,438 .08 24 .4
Fire 4, 291 .87 71 , 972 125166 . 21 16 . 9
Bldg. Inspection 2 , 395 . 67 30, 916 63808.41 22 .0
Electrical Inspection - 2 , 300 - -
Civil Defense 7 .20 18 , 991 98 . 91 . 5
Animal Control 275 .00 4,050 912 . 61 22 . 5
Engineering 35488 . 56 723062 16 ,884. 70 23 . 4
Street & Alley 15 ,434 . 91 246 , 239 54, 784. 19 22 . 2
Shop 13352 . 52 21 , 522 6 , 367 . 58 29 . 6
Storm Sewer 995 . 10 7 , 918 13750. 52 22 . 1
Weed Control - 820 - -
Swimming Pool .55 37 ,584 965 .47 2 . 6
Parks 7 ,617 .50 126 , 539 233012 . 75 18 . 2
Forestry 155 . 87 423826 739 .42 1 . 7
Garbage Collection 6 , 376 .58 80,050 193942 . 38 24. 9
Unallocated (includes
contingency) 1_2 ,488 . 55 130, 501 19 , 343 .08 14 . 8
TOTAL $11_1 , 193 . 38 $1 ,610, 147 $3353242. 74 20.8
Normal Percentage = 3/12 = 25 .0%
FEC/klk
I I � 1 11 X11 111 11
i
I
III ME 1 11
IN 11
11 Hill
I
G-
1978 CITY OF SHAKOPEE R E V E N U E R E P Q R T AS OF 3-31-78 PAGE 1
FUND n1 GENERAL FUND C U R R E N T M O N T H Y E A R T O D A T E
ACCOUNT/DESCRIPTICN EST. REVENUE ACTUAL VAPIANCE PCT EST. REVENUE ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT
3nll GEN. LFVY - CURRENT .10 452,941.00 .00 4529941.00- .0
3112 S?.LEVY - JU06EMENTS .00 1,429.00 .00 1,429.00- .0
3013 SP. LEVY - LAWS OF LEGIS. .00 .03 .00 .00
3014 SP.LEVY-PERA & FICA .00 .00 .00
3015 SP. LEVY - MATCHING FUNDS .00 62,940.00 .00 629940.00- .0
3016 INVALID OBJECT .10 259087.00 .00 25087.00- .0
3117 INS 'ALID 03JECT .00 T 42,123.00 .00 42,123.00- .0
3023 DEL. PROPERTY TAXES .00 11,000.010 3,455.83 7,544.17- 31.4
3121 PENALTIES & INTEREST .00 .0+) .00 .00
**** TAXES .00 595, 520.00 3,455.83 592,064.17- .6
3111 LIGUQR LICENSES .00 32,800.)) .00 32,800.00- 0
3112 aEEP LICENSES .00 3, 720.03 .00 3,720.00- .0
3113 °I�:GO LICENSES 1.00 50.)) 5.00 45.00- 10.0
3114 CI3ARcTTE LICENSES 12.00 523.3-3 205.00 315.00- 39.4
3115 MISC. RJSINESS LICENSES .00 .00 .00 .00
3130 n^G LICENSES 55.'?0 1,50).00 585.00 915.00- 39.0
3131 PCCL TA3LE LICENSES .00 1,775 00 OJ 1,775.00- 0
3132 RUILOIRG PERMITS 2,339.0;1 22,010.00 5,589.15 16t410.85- 25.4
3133 PLUM3ING PERMITS 457.51 6,200.)0 2,)15.45 4,184.55- 32.5
3134 'AECH�NICAL PERMITS 337.50 3,400.)] 11588.91 1,311,09- 46.7
3135 WELL PER:4ITS 22.'30 450.)J 61.00 389.00- 13.6
3136 SEWER & eiATER PERMITS 140.00 400.00 200.03 200.00- 50.0
3137 ELECTRICAL PERMITS 269.50 2 00.3.JI 636.51 21163.50- 22.7
3138 STREET ;;PE+NING PERMITS 15.00 3')).00 65.00 235.00- 21.7
3139 MISC. NON-BUS. PERMITS 2.00 25.00 2.00 23.00- 8.0
3140 UTILITY IiS. PEttMITS . 1) .)) .00 .00
**** LICENSES & PEER.MITS 3,700.50 75,940.00 109953.01 64,986.99- 14.4
331^ FFOFRtL GRANTS 4,151.96 41,405.00 12,375.42 34,529.58- 27.2
3320 STATE GRAINS 257.80 30,273.00 61670.20 239607.80- 22.0
3330 LC�-AL GOVT. 410 52,634.75 210,539.)0 52,634.75 157,904.25- 25.0
3331 ATTAC4FO MACH. AID .00 1Ot00J. )) .00 13,000.00- .0
3332 STATE HWY.MAINT. AID .00 14,000.00 7,012.50 6,987.50- 50. 1
3334 POLICE STATE AID .)0 18, 10).),1 .0) 18,003.00- .0
3340 COUNTY RJAJ F. BRIDGE AID .00 .00 .00 .00
3360 SPUC PYMT.IN LIEU OF TXS. 20,032.00 256,000.00 60,096.00 195,904.00- 23.5
**** GRA'4TS & AIDS 77,176.51 5861222.13 1391238.87 446,933.13- 23.8
3510 ENG. GRADE FEE 27.00 240. Y) 48.00 192.00- 20.0
3511 PLAN CHECK FEE 356.75 3,503.)) 1,711.9) 11788.10- 48.9
3512 ASSESSMENT S-ARLiiES 23.00 150.30 28.00 122.00- 18.7
3513 S'=LE 3F MAPS 17. 10 200.0) 253.01 53.00 126.5
3514 PLATS-REZQN-VAR-COND.USE 50.J-) It000.)J 1)0.00 900.00- 10.0
3515 SURVEY CHECK FEE 27.00 240.)) 48.00 192.30- 20.0
3517 MIS' . PR;:PERTY RENTALS 423.10 7,35)..30 1,142.00 6t208.00- 15.5
1518 ST EET REPAIR .00 2,50J.00 101.00 2,399.00- 4.0
3520 SNC'W REMUVAL .00 1,0-3).1) 525.00 475.00- 52.5
3521 PUF•LIC WORKS RENTALS .1^ 5).OJ .00 50.00- .0
I
Cr
1978 CITY OF SHAKOPEE R E V E N U E R E P D R T AS OF 3-31-78 PAGE 2
FUND ^1 GENERAL FUND C U R R E N T M 0 N T H Y E A R T O 0 A T E
ACCOUNT/DESCRIPTION EST. REVENUE ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT EST. REVENUE ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT
3522 WEED CUTTING CHARGES .00 50.00 .00 50.00- .0
3523 MISC.Dri.WKS.SERVICES .44 100.03 .00 103.00- .0
3524 SALE OF CITY PRJPEKTY .00 .00 60.48 60.48
3534 ACCIDENT REPORTS .00 150.00 14.00 136.00- 9.3
3532 POUND FEES S FINES 158.40 S" ✓ 350.00 409.00 59.40. 116.9_
3533 FIRE CALLS S STANDBY FEES .00 A 69000.00 1,150.00 4,850.00- 19.2
3534 FIRF NUMBER FEES .00 100.00 .00 1.03.00- .0
3540 SEASON TICKETS-POOL .00 18,88).30 .00 18,881.00- .0
3541 ADMISSICNS-PCOL .00 5,680.00 .00 5,680.00- .0
3542 LESSONS .=74 79003.01 .00 7,003.00- .0
3543 MISC. P60L INCOME .�0 800.00 .00 800.00- .0
3610 COLW Y COURT FINES 2,131.33 239000.00 6,427.32 16,572.68- 27.9
373r INVALID OBJECT .10 .00 .00 .00
3731 GARBAGE CGLL. CHARGES 6,6.19.28 80,000.00 20,546.53 59,453.47- 25.7
3310 INTERF_ST 1,557.96 7,000.00 3,456.02 3,543.98-
382:. CCNCFSSICNS-PC0L .01) 4,203.03 .00 4,200.00- .0
3824 SALE OF GASOLINE .00 4,400.00 956.45 3,443.55- 21.7
3830 PERMANENT TRANSFERS .00 176,525.)0 .00 176,525.00- .0
3850 CC"JTP.I9UTIONS G UGNATICN .00 500.00 .00 500.00- .0
3851 INDUSTRY AGREEMENT .00 .01 4,958.32 49959.32
32.54 INVALID OBJECT .00 .10 .00 .00
3950 REFUNDS 6 REIMBURSEMENTS 427.45 1,000.00 1,227.45 227.45 122.7
3951 INS. CLAIMS E SETTLFMENTS .14 .T) .00 .00
3990 MISCELLANEOUS 15.40 500.00 227.84 272.16- 45.6
* * OTHER REVEA UES 11,838.17 352,465.00 43,390.31 309,074.69- 12.3
FUND TOTALS 92,615.18 1,610,147.00 197,088.02 1,413,058.98- 12.2
Cr
1978 CITY OF SHAKOPEE E X P E N n I T U R F R E P R T AS OF 3-31-78 PAGE 1
FUND 01 GENERAL FUND C U R R E N T M O N T H Y E A R T O D A T E
ACCCUNTIDESCRIPTIJN APPROPRIATION ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT APPROPRIATION ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT
4100 SALARIES-FULL TIME 47,432.26 586, 578.00 132,111.62 454,466.38 22.5
4112 OVERTIME-FULL TIME 423.19 89333.00 1,729.85 6,600.15 20.8
4130 SALARIES - PART TIME 4,035.48 91,054.00 9,640.78 81,413.22 10.6
4132 SEVFRIN'CE PAY no .11 .00 .00
414') PER.A 3,371.66 46,897.OJ 9,257.29 37,639.71 19.7
4141 PFNSIONS-FICA 1,581.37 21, 749.00 4,448.60 179300.40 20.5
4142 INVILIO OBJECT .00 4,603.00 .00 4,609.00 .0
415 HEALTH LIFE INSURANCE 1,740.14 28,303.30 49812.24 23,490.76 17.0
4151 WCFKNENS CJ:4P.INSURANCE .00 33,111.04) 21,530.63 119583.37 65.0-
4152 Ur•�E:'PLr�YMENT COMP. .00 1,073.3') .00 19001.100 .0
**** PERSONAL SERVICES 58,514.10 821,630.03 183,531.01 638,098.99 22.3
4210 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,138.32 3,850. )0 19971.63 1,878.37 51.2
4215 INV:LIO OBJECT .00 .00 .00 .00
422n GE':FRAL SUPPLIES 1,902.52 21,300.00 6,014.34 15.285.66 28.2
4221 CHEYICALS 343.77 3,000.M 768.12 29231.88 25.6
4222 'ACTOR FUELS E LUBRICANTS 4,277.55 30,325.)0 8,998.99 21,326.31 29.7
4223 CLOTHING-PERS.EJUIP`Ar:NT 82.40 2,51n.0.1 766.95 1.733.05 30.7
4224 SAFETY SUPPLIES 155.60 1,600.70 279.27 19320.73 17.5
4225 SM?LL TUOL PURCHASES 249.55 3,250.30 692.13 2,557.87 21.3
4231 EQUIP.M.-AINT. E REPAIR 680.38 12,800.0) 4,220.18 d,579.82 33.0
4231 SLOG MAINT E REPAIR 164.04 59450.,)0 1,023.91 4,429.39 18.7
4232 VEHICLE MAINT. 6 REPAIR 632.^5 20,400.90 5,628.59 14,771.41 27.6
4233 CCM'1. SYSTE 4 AALNT. 149.24 4,200.00 199.89 4,701.11 4.7
4234 UTIL.SYSTEM AAINT. C CON. .JO 59030.03 599.53 49400.47 12.0
4240 RCAD MATERIALS .00 4,507.00 133.11 49361.89 3.1
4241 PATCHIN1i MATERIALS .00 5,003.)•) 94.80 5015.20 1.4
4242 SEAL COATING 00 2),11J.)0 .00 20,0"x.00 .0
4243 GROUNDS MAINT. MATERIALS .GO 3,000.00 .00 3003.00 .0
4244 ICF C'INTROL MATERIALS .00 31 00J.)0 870.00 2,130.00 29.0
4250 SIG'!SF.STRIP ING MATERIALS 612.74 61700.J) 735.40 5,964.60 11.0
**** SUPPLIES C REPAIRS 109378.15 156,875.)0 32,987.84 123,887.16 21.0
43')-1 INV^-LIO OBJECT .00 .03 .00 .00
4310 LEGAL SERVICES 119353.33 25,00).)0 15,732.39 9,267.61 62.9.
4311 AUDIT C FIN. SERVICES . )0 6,0)).4)0 .00 69000.00 .0
4312 ENGINEErtING SERVICES 1,275.95 189650.00 5,712.70 12037.30 30.6
4313 EDP DESIGN E SUFTWACE 15.10 .00 15.01 15.00-
4314 QL^^.N 1 N .110 24,5JJ.)J .00 24,503.00 .0
4315 OTHER PAGF. SERVICES 861.00 50,070.03 13,531.31 36,538.69 27.0
**** PRCFESSIUNAL SERVIES 13,5?5.28 1249220.33 34.991.40 89,223.60 28.2
4370 POSTAGE E00.04 2,805.00 1,016.97 1,788.03 36.3
4321 TELEPHO E 1,319.14 11,100.00 2,6d2.58 d,417.42 24.2
#*** CCN'4UNICATIONS 1,919.?3 13,90.00 3,699.55 10,205.45 26.6
4330 TPAVEL EXPENSE 344.20 7,53).03 1,027.62 6002.38 13.6
**t= TPAVEL 344.20 79530.00 1,02 .62 6,50Z.38 13.6
1978 CITY OF SHAKOPEE E X P E N G I T U R F R E P 9 R T AS OF 3-31-78 PAGE 2
FUND 01 GENERAL FUND C U R R E N T M O N T �: Y E A R T O 0 A T E
ACCOUNT/DESCRIPTION APPROPRIATIC:V ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT APPROPRIATION ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT
_ 435!? LEGAL NOTICES PUBLISHING 1,734.28 7.225.0•) 19479.65 5,745.35 20.5
4351 PRINTING C REPRODUCTION 1,572.50 4,225.00 1,633.60 29591.40 38.7-
**** PRINTING & REPRODUCT 2,606.78 11,450.00 3,113.25 8,336.75 27.2 "
4360 GEN. E LIAR. INSURANCE 23.00 4,740.00 43.00 49697.00 .9
_ 4361 PROP. E BOILER INSURANCE .00 7,611.00 .00 7,611.00 .0
4362 VFHICLE F. EQUIP.INS. .10 129562.30 .00 12,562.00 .0
**** INSURANCE 23.00 24,913.00 43.00 24,870.00 .2
4370 ELECTRICITY 29233.71 22,100.00 4,280.88 17,819.12 19.4
4371 NATURAL GAS E HTG 3,044.30 129200.00 8,248.85 3,951.15 67.6"
4372 WATER .00 1,384.00 168.00 1,216.00 12.1
4373 GARS.DISPOSAL/DUMP CHGS. 6,427.77 80,130.00 20037.71 60,092.29 25.0
4330 LAN') Et E N T A L .00 1,200.11) .00 1920J.00 .0
4331 BUILOINi; riENTAL .00 .00 On .00
4332 MACHINERY RENTAL .00 3,150.00 899.13 29250.87 28.5
4383 LIFFICt: EQUIPMENT RENTAL 339.29 3,90).)1 972.53 2,927.47 24.9
4334 EOP EQUIPMENT kENTAL 5,910.58 18,750.00 8,268.86 10,481.14 44.1-
**** UTILITIES F RENTALS 13,002.65 142, 814.00 42,875.96 99,938.04 30.0'
439^ CCNEERElvCES E SCHCCLS 347.69 119184.00 2,037.35 9,146.65 18.2
4391 DUFS & SJ3SCRIPTIONS 243.50 5925J.10 1,454 00 3.796 00 27.7 '
4392 LICENSFS .00 355.00 14.00 341.00 3.9
4394 BCCKS & PAMPmLETS 10.00 1,88).00 322.90 1,557.10 17.2
4396 "FETING EXPENSE .nn 82J.)•) 31.00 789.00 3.8
**** CCNF,SC4O3LS,3C0KS 611.19 19,489.00 3,859.25 15,629.75 19.8
4410 JANITORIAL SERVICES 932.92 0V C 9,750.03 3,931.68 5,818.32 40.3
4411 W..I ENT USc CHARGES .00 850.00 .00 850.00 .0
4425 BLOOD TESTS .00 300.30 65.00 235.00 21.7
**** PRISr.., BOARD &JANITO 962.92 109900..)0 3,996.68 69903.32 36.7
4509 CAPITAL-OTHER 500.00 14,800.03 5JO.00 14,300.00 3.4'
4510 CAPITAL - VEHICLES .00 33,200.)0 4,575.00 289625.00 13.8
4511 CAPITAL-EQJIPrlEVT 2,6!)3.42 65,825.00 7,534.04 58,290.96 11.4
4512 CAPITAL-OFFICE EQUIPMENT 336.13 8,463.)) 1,106.64 79356.36 13.1
4513 VrN & EASEMENT COSTS .10 .30 .00 .00
4516 SEWFP CONSTRUCTIQN .00 .00 .00 .00
4519 CTHFR IMPROVEMENTS 256.59 28,60).0-) 4,646.19 23,953.81 16.2
**** CAPITAL & IMPROVMNTS 3,751.14 150,389.00 18,361.87 132,526.13 12.2
4710 PFRMA'lFNT TRANSFERS .nn, 26,333.00 59000.00 219333.00 19.0
4940 ME?CHANDISE FOR R M LE .JO 11800.00 .00 1,800.00 .0
AS50 INVALID OBJECT 39.00 .33 39.00 39.00-
- 4980 REFUNDS .1 550.00 126.10 423.90 22.9
4991 SALTS TAX .?J 801).00 .00 301.00 .0
O�-
1978 CITY CF SHAKOPEE F X P F N C I T U R E P E P 0 R T AS OF 3-31-78 PAGE 3
FUM0 01 GENERAL FUND C U R R E N T M 9 N T H Y E A R T O D A T E
ACCOUNT/OESCRIPTIJN APPROPRIATION ACTUAL VARIA"CE PCT APPROPRIATION ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT
4982 TAXES .10 .00 .00 .00
4990 MISCELLANEOUS 456.73 � G., ` 1105).00 1,590.21 540.21-151.4
4991 CONTINGENCY .30 95,000.00 .00 95,00 .00 .0
**** OTHER EXPENDITURES 495.73 125,533.0-3 6,755.31 113,777.69 5.4
FUND TuTALS 111,193.38 1,61),147.-30 335,242.74 1,274,904.26 20.8
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES
MARCH 31, 1978
% General Fund Jt. Rec. Rev. Shrg. Pk. Res. Comm. Dev. HRA P.S. Bldg.
1
01 11 12 13 14 15 21
Jan. 1, 1978 Cash Balance 721.00 981.60 757.37 (1,817.21) (4,085.67 5,880.57 5,796.93
Revenue + 197,088.02 11,202.58 18,201.90 11,376.66 - 420.21 -
Sale of Investments + 511,496.86 7,000.00 36,000.00 - - 15,000.00 -
Transfer from Savings + - 5,000.00 - - - - -
Expenditures - 335,242.74 19,402.59 - 206.80 566.00 2,463.27 56.90
Purchase of Investments - 297,000.00 - 54,000.00 - - 18,000.00 -
Transfer to Savings - 72,000.00 - - 9,000.CO - - -
March 31, '78 Cash Balance $ 5,063.14 4,781.59 959.27 352.65 (4,651.67) 837.51 5,740.03
March 31, '78 Investments 51,000.00 - 44,000.00 - - 18,000.00 -
varch 31, '78 Savings 81 000.00 12 000.00 - 9 000.00 4,000.00 35,000.00 -
TOTAL CASH, INVESTMENTS & SAVINGS $ 137,063.14 16,781.59 44,959.27 9,352.65 (651.67) 57,837.51 5,740.03
Dt.Serv. PIR '67 Imp. '68 Imp. '71 Imp. '72 Imp. '73 Imp.
31 41 42 43 44 45 46
Jan. 1, 1978 Cash Balance 578.56 123.32 16,441.C4 6,589.07 1,147.38 2,459.16 4,855.80
Revenue + 605.40 5,000.57 - - 634.59 2,112.65 232.60
Sale of Investments + 109,000.00 150,000.00 - - 10,000.00 138,000.CO 64,000.00
Transfer from Savings + - - - - - - -
Expenditures - 73,993.65 96.49 33,852.01 - 11,047.50 55,004.81 57,766.71
Purchase of Investments - 36,000.00 111,000.00 - 6,000.00 - 87,COO.CO 11,000.00
Transfer to Savings - - - - - - - -
March 31, '78 Cash Balance $ 190.31 44,027.40 (50,293.05) 589.07 734.47 567.00 321.69
March 31, '78 Investments 36,000.00 185,000.00 - 6,000.00 20,881.25 102,000.00 11,000.00
March 31, '78 Savings - - - - - - -
TOTAL CASH, INVESTMENTS & SAVINGS $ 36,190.31 229,027.40 (50,293.05) 6,589.07 21,615.72 102,567.00 11,321.69
73 Ser. B '74 Imp. '75 Imp. 175 Temp. '76-1 Imp. '77 Imp.B '77 Imp.A
47 48 49 50 51 52 53
Jan. 1, 1978 Cash Balance 5,276.12 1,165.88 304.04 1,288.35 4,069.92 982.69 3,271.61
Revenue + 3,020.90 3,219.97 884.30 595,743.88 23 ,665.47 2,863.00 4,230.50
Sale of Investments + 114,000.00 301,COO.CO 40,000.00 19,798.77 159,000.00 230,000.00 20,000.00
i Transfer from Savings + - - - 19,000.CO - - 15,000.00
Expenditures - - - 24,790.00 614,433.75 37,016.44 75,531.17 6,612.46
Purchase of Investments - 120,000.00 302,000.00 15,000.00 21,000.CO 115,000.00 158,000.00 32,000.00
Transfer to Savings - - - - - 25,000-00 - -
March 31, '78 Cash Balance $ 2,297.02 3,385.85 1,398.34 397.25 5,718.95 314.52 3,889.65
March 31,78 Investments 120,000.CO 150,000.00 75,000.00 21,000.00 142,000.00 738,OCO.00 32,000.CO
Match 31,78 Savings 25,000.00 - - 88 000.00 25 000.00 32,000.00 7,C00.00
TOTAL CASH, INVESTMENTS & SAVINGS $ 147,297.02 153,385.85 76,398.34 109,397.25 172,718.95 770,314.52 42,889.65
'77 Imp. C '78 Imp. Sewer Trust
54 55 71 81
Jan. 1, 1978 Cash Balance 686.10 - 877.28 1,837.43
Revenue + 15,352.99 - 100,491.21 75,318.06
Sale of Investments + 705,000.00 - - -
Transfer from Saving + 27,000.00 - 36,000.00 17,000.00
Expenditures - 617,415.72 1,139.62 100,317.95 78,5 5.21
Purchase of Investments - 93,000.00 - 30,000.00 -
Transfer to Savings - 27,000.00 - 6,000.00 15,000.00
March 31, '78 Cash Balance $ 10,623.37 ( 1,139.62) 1,050.54 570.28
March 31, '78 Investments 93,000.CO - 80,000.00 -
March 31, '78 Savings - - 14,000.60 33,779.49
TOTAL CASH, INVESTMENTS & SAVINGS $ 103,623.37 (1,139.62) 95,050.54 34,349.77
ITY CF SHAKGPEE CHECK RFGISTER 04 12 78 PAGE 11 /
CHECK NO. DATE AMCUNT VENDOR ITEM OESCRIPTICN ACCCLNT NJ. INV. S P.O. # YESSA3E
i =CJ3 uti112/76 17.50 ALTC CENTRAL SUPPLY GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-421-42
_'C3 1411Z/78 19.95 ALTO CENTRAL SUPPLY GEN. SUPPLIES 01-422C-441-44
3 ;;4/1c171 1.35 ALTC CENTRAL SUPPLY GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4224-621-62
1 0 C 3 04/12/7•1 103.59 ALTC CEN7i4AL SUPPLY ECU IP.N:INT. 0 L-423C-311-32
11'2�03 04/12/73 13.34 ALTS CENTRAL SUPPLY E0LIP.MAINT. 01-4230-421-42
1°'C J? ;4fi2178 2C.6o ALTC CENTRAL SUPPLY ECLIP.rAINT. _ CL-423C-622-62
^.;J3 04/lLJld 15.20 ALTC CENTRAL SUPPLY VEHICLE AA1NT. 01-4232-3il-31
L,f1G17d 17.14 ALTC CENTRAL SUPPLY VEh1CL_ 'IAI\T. U1-4232-321-32
2/73 6.92 AUTO CENIRAL SUPPLY VEHICLE "A 1.4 T. J1-4232-331-33
I. ZC03 ;4/14:/76 223.17 ALTO CENTRAL SUPPLY VEI-ICLE TAINT. 01-4232-421-42
i�2 C J3 04/i2/78 18.74 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINT. JL-4232-621-62
462.9E * ---
..
iQZJ^6 04/12/70 11.25 A I R C 0 P m CCvM.SYS.MAlNT. 01-4233-311-31
iJ_C06 U4/LLi73 12.5C AIRCOMM CCMM.SYS.,44INT. 01-4233-421-42
23.75 * -- - - -
1?2012 C4/12/Td 7.CO ASTLEF3RJ EQUIP. VEHICLE MAINT. 31-4232-621-62
7.00
_-t--�• *s*-CKS -
432.^C ARCCN CCN51RUCTICN MTRM.IIN 15-4517-145-19
S:4112l76 13,742.50 AFCCN CC%STFUCTICN gCAC CC4ST. 52-451E-9il-91
J'JZ4
j4/l.:/7d 18,742.5"v- ARCCN CCNSTRUCTION CTHER IMP. 52-45-19-911-91
?324 4!11/76 18,742.50 AFCCN C"ISTRUCTiCN CTI-ER I`".P. 52-4519-911-51
:'?•:'4 ;4f11/7o '+32.G0- ARCCN CC\STkUCTIC� ATR VIA IN 54-4517-511-91
:4/lG/T3 432.00 ARCCN CC'.'STRL'CTICA MTr�AI1. CCVST. 5+-47L7-411-91
19,174.30
***-CKS
2033 J4/iZ/7d 15.54 6ERENS GEN. SUP-)LIES Ji-422J-lil-18
15.`4
j4/1t/76 51.24 BATTERY inhSE. S=RV. VEHICLE 11:1`*T. 01-4232-421-42 29573
34 u4112/70 106.61; 2ATTERY 1,HSE. SERV. VEHICLE M.>1NT. 71-4232-111-71 29405
157.84 *
04/11/73 2.75 9RIESE INC. TRACTCQ E:lir.'"aiVT. 01-4230-621-o2 31282
:4/ic/76 372.32 6RIESE INC. TPACTCR ELUIP.%!AINT. 01-423C-621-62
375."'7 *
:;' ;27 04/12/78 3,101.86 2ANKEFS LIFE h S L INS. X31-4525-Sit-91
3,1C1.E6
��:�J 04/11/76 66.26 BRYIN AGGFEGATFS RGAO .MATERIALS 01-4240-421-42
1978 CITY OF SHAKOPEE CHECK REGISTER 04 12 78 PAGE 2
CHECK NO. DATE AMCUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOLNT NO. INV. 9 P.C. k MESSAJE
66.26 * --- -
**#* ***-CKS
102061 04/12/78 1.43 CCAST TO COAST GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-121-12
132061 04/12/76 .42 CCAST TO COAST GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-411-41
1020E1 04/12/711 1.62 CCAST TJ COAST GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-621-62
3.47 *
102064 U4/12/78 76.90 CLAYS PRINTING PRINTING 01-4351-121-12 7514
76.90 # - - --
#*t** **#-CKS
102072 04/12/78 11097.17 CCMM. OF PERSONNEL FICA REMIT. 31-4922-911-91
11.397.17 =
###*## ***-CKS
102084 J4112/78 1CO.00 CCNR4CY BODY SHCP VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-311-31 7026
1C0.00
***-CKS -
102089 04/12/78 15.40 CGM-PAK CHEMICAL GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-321-32 5230
- 15.40
102093 04/12/78 28.10 DUNNING S HUWE. GEN. SUPPLIES 31-4220-181-18
102J93 04/12/78 1.08 OUNNING S HC'nE. GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-441-44
102093 04/12/78 17.83 CUNNING S hCAE. GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-t21-62
102093 04/12/78 32.06 CLNNING S HCnE. GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-622-62
1S_:93 04/12/73 16.20 CLNNING S HCWE. GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-625-62
102293 J4/i2/78 6.08 GUNNING S HCWE. SMALL TOOLS 01-4225-622-62
1J2C93 U4112/78 16.61 CLNNING S H Co.E. E1..UIP.NAINT. 01-4130-321-32
102093 0411el78 13.45 OLNNING S HCWE. EQUIP.MAINT. 01-423x-621-62
102C93 04112/78 2.25 CLNNING S FCnE. ECLIP.M4INT. 01-423C-6Z5-62
132093 04/12/76 2.C2 OLNNING S HCwE. eLCG. 'MAINT. 01-4231-oZ5-62
102093 C4/12/78 27.10 CUNNING S HCWE. VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-321-32
164.78 # -
***-CKS
102121 64/12/73 9.94 EASTMAN DRUG MISC. 01-4990-411-41
9.S4 *
*x C#k ***—%K1
102151 04/12/78 335.88 EARL FLECK TRAVEL EXPENSE 01-433C-211-21
102151 04/12/78 66.62 EARL FLECK MEETING EXPENSE 01-4396-211-21
4C2 .5C *
1978 CITY OF SHAKOPEE CHECK REGISTER 04 12 78 PAGE 3
CHECK NC. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NU. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
t*ta* ***-CKS
102153 04/12/78 5.58 FIRST NATIONAL BANK MI SC. _ 01-4990-151-15
5.58 *102157 04/12/78 627.11 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL GEN. SUPPLIES 71-4220-911-91 3502
627. 11 $
##*** ***-CKS
.02189 04112/78 188.1.0 GCULDS EGUIP.MAINT. 01-4230-622-62 46253
188.CG #
**## * ***-GKS
102191 04112/78 34.50 MICHAEL GCLCBERG SC1-OOL 01-439C-331-33
34.50 #
102224 04/12178 3.CO HENNEN-S SKELLY VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-311-31
102224 04112/78 4.5C HENNEN-S SKELLY VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-411-41
102224 04/12/78 19.1.0 HENNEN-S SKELLY VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-421-42
26.50
#***** ***-GKS
102230 04/12/78 1,638.2C HAYDEN-MURPHY ECUIP. CAP.-EQUIP. 01-4511-421-42 69105
1,638.20
102235 04/12/78 2.23 HARMONS HCWE.HANK GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-141-14 4739
2.23
:ter*s ***-CKS
102238 04/12/78 1 ,175.30 HARMGNY HOUSE CTHER I•MP. 01-4519-181-18 3358 -
1 ,175.3G
*# $T* ***-CKS -
102251 04112178 _ 20.00 ICMA BOOKS 01-4394-121-12 022852
20.00
*#**** ***-GKS
102259 04/12/ld 60.00 IBM CORP. EQUIP.MAINT. 01-4230-141-14
102259 04/12/78 120.00 IBM CCRP. EQUIP.MAINT. 01-42j0-311-31 3YL127
180.1.0
1978 CITY OF SHAKOPEE CHECK REGISTER 04 12 78 PAGE 4
CHECK V0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.C. 9 MESSAGE
102291 04/12/78 150.CC KRASS E MANAHAN LEGAL SERVICES 01-4310-161-16
102291 J4/12/78 607.50 KRASS E MANAHAN LEGAL SERVICES 01-4310-162-16
102291 04/12/78 40.CC KRASS E MANAHAN LEGAL SERVICES 01-4310-163-16
102291 J4/12/76 470.01, KRASS 6 MANAHAN LEGAL SERVICES 01-4310-165-16
102291 04/12/76 60.00 KRASS 6 MANAHAN LEGAL SERVICES 52-4310-911-91
1327.50
102292 04112/78 54.19 KCEHNEN-S STANCARC VEHICLE MAIA T. 01-4232-311-31
54.19
****** ***-CKS
102313 04/12/78 44.00 LA HASS MFG. VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-421-42 5424
44.00
sttta3
-. . ***-CKS
102316 G4/12/78 23.84 LATHRCP PAINT SUPPLY GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-621-62
--- - -
102316 04/iZ/7b 12.66 LATHRCP PAINT SUPPLY CEN. SUPPLIES 01-422C-651-65
102316 04/12/78 92.91 LATHRCP PAINT SLPFLY EQUIP.MAINT. 01-4230-622-62
129.41
+►***** ***-CKS
102341 04/12/78 20.63 MACCUEEN EQUIP. EQLIP.MAINT. 01-4230-421-42 2007
20.63
102342 J4/12/73 26.82 MALKEFSON MCTCRS VEHICLE 01-4232-311-31
26.82
-CKS
102349 04/12/78 441.00 MOBIL OIL MCTCR FUELS J1-4222-421-42 86953
441.CO
sTt=*s **r-CKS
107_351 04/12/78 1 .91 MOTOR PARTS GEN. SUPPLIES 01-42?0-421-42
102351 04/12/Td 15.24 MOTO& PARTS EC'JIP.MAINT. 01-4230-421-42
102351 04/12/78 6.37 MCTCR PARTS VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-311-31
102351 G4/12/7d 29.12 MCTCR PARTS VEFICLE MAINT. JL-4232-421-42
1J2351 04112/78 44.64 MOTOR PARTS VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-621-62
97.23 -
,��***
102353 u4/12/78 8.25 MILAN. VALLEY ELEC. ELECTRIC 01-4370-427-42
102353 151.83 MINN. VALLEY ELEC. CAP-OTHER 01-4509-427-42
160.C8
102355 04/12/78 43.1,E MN. SAFETY CCUNCIL SAFETY 3UPPLIS 01-4224-421-42 4480
43.C6
1978 CITY OF SHAKOPEE CHECK REGISTER 04 12 78 PAGE 5
CHECK NG. DATE AM-CUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTIGN ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.J. # MESSAGE
r*** * *
KS
102377 102377 04/12/78 5E.75- MINN. BENEFIT ASSN. CANCER INS. 81-4S26-911-91 _
102377 04/12178 58.75 MINN. BENEFIT ASSN. CANCER INS. 81-4526-911-91
102377 04/12/78 58.75 MINN. BENEFIT ASSN. CANCER INS. 81-4926-911-91
58.75 * _-. -- - - - - - - ---
***tom*
***-CKS
102386 04/12/76 501.84 N++ BELL PHCNE BILL 01-4321-121-12
102386 04/12/7b 37.1p NM BELL PHCNE BILL 01-4321-151-15
102386 04/12/76 51.25 NIA BELL PHCNE BILL 01-4321-182-18
102386 C41i2/78 14.56 Nk BELL PHCNE BILL 01-4321-183-18
102386 04/1Z/73 266.49 NW BELL FHCPtE BILL 01-4321-311-31
12386 04/12/74 53.84. N+r BELL _ PHCNE BILL _ 01-4321-321-32
102386 C"4/12/78 65.34 NN BELL FHCNE BILL 01-4321-421-42
990.50
***-CKS----
102412__._._ 04/12478 151.50 _ PITNEY 30V,ES GEN. SUPPLIE _ 01-4220-121-12 137352
102412 04/11/78 229.59 PITNEY B06ES CFF. ECUIP.RENTAL 01-4383-121-12 96791
381.C9
# ;* ***-CKS -- -
102414 J4/12/76 . 23.15 PAKC FILMSHOPS GEN. SUPPLIE 01-4220-311-31 26000
102414 04/12/74 2. 19 PAKC FILMSHOPS CEN. SUPPLIE 01-4220-411-41 77392
25.34
***-CKS -- -.
102420 . ._ . . 04/11/78 . _ _. _. _20.00 _ HARCLC PASS GEN. SUPPLIES __ __ .01-4220-611-62
1242.0 04/12/78 10.00 HARCLC PASS MACH. RENTAL 01-4382-421-42
12420 04/12/78 10.Cc HARCLC PASS MACH. RENTAL 01-4382-451-42
40.00 * - - - - --- -
a-*tom* ***-CKS
102448 04/12/78 28.50 REYNOLDS bELUING GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-441-44
102448 04112/7d 123.40 REYNCLDS wELDIrIC EC;LIP.MAINT. 01-4230-421-42
-.. _ 151.90 *.
102449 04/11/76 139.50 RACIO SHACK GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-111-11 150056
102449 Q4112/70 70.30 RADIO SHACK GEN. SUPPLIES J1-4220-411-41
102449 04/12/78 yQ !� 5.S5 RACIC SHACK GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-421-42 61380
1-02449 04/12/74 70.30 RADIC SHACK GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-441-41
102449 C4112/76 70.30- RADIO SHACK GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-441-41
132449 04/11/78 95.CG RADIU SHACK CAP-OFF. EuUIP. 01-4512-331-33 150056
102449 04/12173 84.40 RADIC SHACK LEGAL NOT. PUB. 54-4350-911-91
102449 04112/76 84.40- RACIC SHACK LEGAL NOT. PUB. 54-4350-911-91
310.75
+*x** ***-CKS
1978 CITY OF SHAKOPEE CHECK REGISTER 04 12 78 PAGE 6
CHECK NC. DATE AMCUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
102453 04/12/76 64.38 RGCO CIL MOTOR FUELS 01-4222-421-42 11656
64.38
***-GKS-
102459 04112/78 126.48 JOHN PIES GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-321-32
- -- -
126.48
* .. -._ -- ---- ------_-- - -----
*ez *t ***-CKS
102461 04/12178 180.81 RLFFRIDGE-JCHNSCN EQUIP.MAINT. 01-4230-421-42 88102
180.81
102462 04/12/78 40.3C 4ICH/LYNN CORP. CEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-121-12 5E088
40.3J *
srt,rT* ***-CKS
102465 J4/12/78 21.50 RING FIRE EXTG. EQUIP.MAINT. 01-4230-321-32
21.50 *
***-GKS.._..
102467 04/12/78 20.CO RIES CHARLES EZUIP.MAINT. 01-4230-321-32
102467 C4/12/78 12.00 RIES CHARLES 80CKS 0I-4394-321-32
32.00
102477 J4/12/73 19.45 SUEL BUSINESS OFF. SUPPLIES 01-4213-111-12
_ - _-
1C2477 04/11/713 12.55C SUEL 2USINESS OFF. SUPPLIES 01-4210-141-14
_01.477 G4/12/7d 17.30 SLEL EJ�i�ESS CFF. S PPLiES 01-4210-3ii-31
1',2477 Wi2/76 26.23 S:.EL ?U�.INESS CFF. SU-'PLIES 01-421J-331-33 _
102477 041112/76 14.55 SUEL e SINE SS CFF. SU?PL.LS GI-4210-411-41
102477 04/12/78 19.45 SLFL E J 5 1 N Z S S CFF. SUPPLIES J1-421J-421-12
12477 04/12/78 19.45- SLFL E'JSI`:ESS CFF. SURPLiES 31-4210-421-42
IC2477 J4/1 2/7b 7.95 SUEL EUSINESS CFF. SUPPLIES 01-4210-421-42 - - - ---
I:'_47.7 04/12/73 124.26' SLFL °USI'.:SS Cc's. SOPPLiES 01-4223-121-12
ivZ477 04/12/78 147.50 SUEL E•JSI%i SS GEN. SJ?PLiES 01-4220-lol-16
102477 04/12/78 48.CC SLz-L EJSII\ESS ECLIP.MAIN T. CI-4230-311-31
102477 04/12/78 35.00 SUEL 8USINESS CFF. E .UIP.RENTAL 01-4333-i41-14
453.64
102478 04/12/70 21 .60 SHAKCFEE LUMB_R CEn. SLPPLIES J1-422J-141-14
1.2478 04/i2/73 29.52 SHAKCFEE LUM^ER CEA. SUPPLIES 01-422Q-ti21-42
102478 04/12/76 3.24 SHAKCPEIE LUMB ER GEN. SU?PLIES 01-4220-611-62 -
I 0042478 04/12/7d 23.32 SHAKOFEE LUMBER. GEN- SUPPLIES 01-4220-622-62
102478 04/12176 5.40 SHAKOPEE LUMBER BLCF. MAINT. 01-4231-622-62
1,)2478 04/12/78 22.14 SI-AKCFEE LUMBER 8LCF. MNINT. 01-4231-625-62
i112473 04/12/78 374. 15 SHAKIiF�E LUM3cR CAP-�vUIP. 01-4511-625-62
479.41 *
102479 J4/12178 19216.45 SHAKCFEE VALLEY PL9. LEGAL NOT. PUB. 01-4350-121-12
102479 04/12/78 13.88 SHAKOPEE VALLEY PLF. LEGAL NJT. PU8. 01-y350-i65-16
-r 1978 CITY CF SHAKOPEE CHECK REGISTER 04 12 78 PAGE 7
CHECK NC. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
102479 04/12/78 35.41 SHAKOPEE VALLEY PUB. LEGAL NOT. PU3. 51-4350-911-91
102479 04/12/78 84.4C SHAKOPEE VALLEY PLB. LEGAL NOT. PUB. 54-4350-911-91
102479 04/12/78 42.89 SHAKOPEE VALLEY PUB. LEGAL .NOT.,-PUB. 55-4350-911-91
1,393.03
1024881 J4/12/7d 1,084.60 SHAKOPEE FIRE CEPT. PT FIRE DEPT.. 01-4130-321-32
1.,084.60
102483 04/12/78 155.36 SHAKOPEE TIRE VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-311-31
155.36
102484 04/12/78 36.20 STARK-S CLEANING BLDG. MAINT. 01-4231-131-18
102484 04/12/78 16.20 STARK-S CLEANING BLCG. MAINT. 01-4231-182-18
102484 04/12/78 16.CC STARK-S CLEANING BLCG. MAINT. 01-4231-311-31
102484 04/12/74 1u.O0 STARK-S CLEANING BLCG. MAINT. 01-4231-421-42
78.4C
102485 04/12/78 52.95 SPUC BLDG. MAINT. 01-4231-634-62 2033
102485 04/12/74 212.45 SPUC ELECTRIC BILL 01-4370-181-18
102485 04/12/78 140.65 SPUC ELECTRIC BILL 01-4370-182-18 _ _
102485 04/12/78 173.13 SPUC ELECTRIC BILL 01-4370-311-31
102485 04/12/74 117.13 SPUC ELECTRIC BILL 01-4370-321-32
LC2485 04/12/7d -_ .. 346.26 _ _. SPUC ELECTRIC BILL 01-4310-421-42 .
102485 04/12/78 169.43 SPUC ELECTRIC BILL 01-4370-427-42
102485 04112/76 144.95 SPUC ELECTRIC SILL O1-4370-611-61
102435 U4/1,L/78 43.70 SPEC ELECTRIC BILL _ 01-4370-622-62
1O24E5 04/12/78 40.75 SPUC ELECTRIC ti ILL 01-4310-625-62
102485 04/12/78 22.06 SPUC ELECTRIC BILL 01-4370-628-62
10,2455 04/12/78 _. 5.G0 SPUC hATER BILL_. 01-4312-141-18
102485 74/12/78 42.66 SPUC 'AATER BILL 01-4312-311-31 - - --- --
132425 04/12/78 85.34 SPUC WATER BILL 01-4372-421-42
102485 04/.2/78 _. 8.00 SPUC __ hATER BILL _. _--_ 01-4372-611-61
102485 04/12/78 55.00 SPUC WATER BILL 01-4372-628-62
1,669.46
102488 04/12/78 433.25 SUBLREAN ENG. ENG. SERVICES 01-4312-411-41 786202
102489 04/12/76 127.5C SLBUR?AN ENG. ENG. SERVICES 15-4312-195-19 786204
1O24E8 04/12/7ti 19613.0C SLELREAN ENC. ENG. SERVICES 52-4:12-911-91 786201
102488 04/12/78 210.00 SU8UREAN ENG. ENG. SERVICES 53-4312-911-91 780203
102488 84/12/78 3,694.25 SLBUREAN ENG. ENG. SERVICES 55-4312-911-91 786206
69O78.CC
102489 04/12/78 44.EC SLPERCMERICA GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-311-31
132489 04/12/73 .75 SUPERAMERICA MOTOR FUELS JI-4222-311-31
45.55 - -- -
102490 04/12/76 13.00 ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL BLCOD TESTS 01-4425-311-31
13.CJ x _
1978 CITY OF SHAKUPEE CHECK REGISTER 04 12 78 PAGE $
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. 0 MESSAGE
102492 04112/78 3.96 SHAKOPEE HOWE.- GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-311-31
102492 04/12/78 5.65 SHAKOPEE HUWE. GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-421-42
102492 04/12/78 15.51 SHAKOPEE HOiKE. GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-621-62
102492 04/12/78 1.97 SHAKOPEE FDYiE. GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-625-62
27.09 # - - - --
102494 04/12/78 37.15 STEIN-S INC. EQUIP.MAINT. 01-4230-441-44 2485
37.15 $
102497 04/12/73 15.95 SHAKOPEE FORC VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-411-41 62494
15.9:
--
102.499 04/12/76 14. 10 SCCTT CTY. CEN.SERV. GEN. SUPPLIES 01-4220-151-15
14.1" m
;�t#: ##*-CKS
102502 04112/78 29.64 SHAKOPEE HOUSE MISC. J1-4990-311-31
29.64 #
102503 04/12/78 7.00 STEMMER FARM E GAR. EQUIP.MAINT. C1-4230-625-62 36
7.00
#****# ***-C KS
1025v5 04/12/78 879.93 STATE TREASURER SURCHARGE REMIT. 31-492;-511-91
879.93 $
--
102513 04/12/78 2.80 SCOTT CTY. RECCRCER GEN. SUPPLIES J1-422G-141-14
2.8U
***-CKS
102515 04/12/78 2,COO.CO SOVIK MATHRE. SATHRUM PLANNING 01-4314-171-17 919
2,C00.00 * -
# **## ***-CKS
102519 04/12/78 17.75 SLALVE MAINTENAKCE GEN. SUPPLIES J1-4220-321-32 163
102519 04/12/78 53.25 S6ALVE MAINTENANCE GEN. SUPPLIES Ji-4220-441-44 162
71.CO
T*#t** ***-CKS
102.541 04/12/78 23.95 UNIFORMS LNLIMITEC CLCTHING 01-4223-311-31
1978 CITY CF SHAKGPEE CHECK REGISTER 04 12 78 PAGE 9
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NU. INV. M P.O. 8 MESSAGE
23.95 * - -
' i
102542 04112178 13.CO U.S. FOSTMASTER POSTAGE 01-4320-211-21
102542 04/12178 13.00 U.S. POSTMASTER POSTAGE 01-4320-311-31
26.CO #
�rutr #**-CKS
_- 102562. _ __04/12178 _ _ 86.25 VIKING STEEL GEN. SUPPLIES. _-- 01-4220-451-45 78057
86.25 * ---------- - - ----
*z�za�
102577 04/12/78 17.79 WGCDLAKE SANITATICN TRASH PICK-UP 01-4373-181-18 !
i
-_ 102577 04/12/78 _ _ 3.02 WCCCLAKE SANITATICN TRASH FICK-UP 01-4373-182-18
102577 04/12/78 26.88 WOOOLAKE SANITATICN TRASH PICK-UP 01-4373-311-31
1J2577 04/i2/78 3.02 WCCCLAKE SANITATICN TRASH PICK-UP 01-4373-321-32
102577 04112173 26.88 WCCCLAKE SANITATICN TRASH PICK-UP 01-4373-4i1-42
102577 U4/1G/78 26.EE WCOOLAKE SANITATICN TRASH PICK-UP 01-4373-621-62
102577 04/12174 6,326.54 WCGDLAKE SANITATICN TRASH PICK-UP 01-4373-111-71 i
6.431.C1 -
� rt
**--C KS
102E01 04/12/78 139.62 ZIECLER INC ECUIP.MAINT. 01-4230-421-42 T
139.62
a
-CKS
*r-ar-at
?3 Q3�- 9� FUNC 01 TCTAL
559.5C FLNC 15 TOTAL -- — ---- .__
35.41 FUNC 51 TOTAL
20,415.50 FUNC 52 TCTAL
210.CC _ FUND 53 TOTAL
84.40 FUNC 54 TOTAL
3,737.14 FUNC 55 TCTAL
_ 733.71 FLNC 71 TOTAL
15,437.71 FLNC BL TCTAL
65,462.C7 TCTAL __
DEBIT ACCOUNT CREDIT ACCOUNT AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR CHECKvAMT. CHECK # `"
April 18, •1978
01.4210.121.12 01.1010.000.GO 11.70 Office Supplies Ames Office Supply 11.70
01.4250.431.42 It 204.00 Sign Materials Goodin Co. 2C4.00
01.4390.421.42 if 34.50 School Govt. Trng. Service 34.50
01.4230.321.32 IT 280.98 Equip. Maint. Larson Diesel, Inc. 280.98
01.4232.321.32 It 300.40 Vehicle Maint. Ladder Towers, Inc. 300.40
01.4394.141.14 it 19.50 Books R.S. Means Co. 19.50
01.4511.321.32 667.75 Cap-Equip. Minn. Wanner Co. 667.75
01.4220.411.41 5.20 Gen. Supplies John Weigand 5.20
01.4391.421.42 7.94 Subscription Mechanix Illustrated 7.94
53.4980.911.91 53,1010.000.00 1,937.86 Refund of Sp. Assess. John L. Ries 1,937.86
01.4990.311.31 41.1010.000.00 25.00 Misc. Shakopee Floral 25.00
01.4220.311.31 232.81 Gen. Supplies Sportsman Center 232.81
01.4394.311.31 5.95 Books State of Minn. Register 5.95
01.4220.411.41 17.76 Gen. Supplies Schoell & Madson 17.76
01.4315.311.31 10.00 Prof. Services Sundance Medical Clinic 10.00
01.4394.141.14 70.00 Books Urban Land Institute 70.00
01.4315.161.16 if ty 25.00 Prof. Services Wermerskirchen Abstract 25.00
3,856.35 3,856.35
01 .4512 . 331 . 33 " 95 .00 Cap=Off . Equip. Radio Schack 240. 45
01 .4220. 111 .11 " ". 139. 50 Gen. Supplies
01 .4220.421 .42 " 5 :95 "
01 .4220. 411 .41 70. 30 Rogers Co. 70. 30
01 .4220. 311 .31 62 . 32 " Uniforms Unlimited 62 .32
01 .4225 .441 .44 " 22 . 71 Small Tools Auto Central 22 . 71
4, 252 .13 4, 252 .13
�U
TO: Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: Fredric E . Christiansen, City Treasurer
SUBJECT: SPUC Agreement for Watermain Costs
DATE: April 13 , 1978
The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission has decided to pay their
share of the oversizing costs fcr the County Road #83 watermain
over a ten year period. This is acceptable to the City.
Action Required : Authorize the proper officials to sign the agree-
ment with the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission for payment of
over-sizing costs.
FEC/klk
r, +
s
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
Original Amount: $21, 649. 57 beginning 3-7-78 @ 7%.
DATE INTEREST PRINCIPAL TOTAL UNPAID BALANCE
7-15-78 $ 539.76 $2 , 164.96 $2 , 704.72 $19,484.61
7-15-79 1, 363.92 2, 164.96 3, 528.88 17, 319.65
7-15-80 1, 212 . 38 2, 164.96 3, 377 . 34 15, 154.69
7-15-81 1,060.83 2 , 164.96 3, 225.79 12,989.73
7-15-82 909.28 2, 164.96 3,074.24 10,824.77
7-15-83 757 .73 2 , 164.96 2 ,922 .69 8, 659.81
7-15-84 606. 19 2, 164.96 2 , 771 . 15 6,494.85
7-15-85 454.64 2 , 164.96 2 , 619.60 4, 329.89
7-15-86 303.09 2, 164.96 2 , 468.05 2 , 164.93
7-15-87 151 . 55 2 , 164.93 2, 316.48 ---
#r�rrraa�ri aaaraaaaaraa oa ��aR
'iaara rewweas� . $
rwae +.owewaw�� .
r i r r eti e r a w e e w w w t a cy`"a
brrrrr +ree.r awsaw �
- r r r r<b s era• a• • � �
Cha1"a.gm rely oeear wags,
•rr• •eer 5w w n; +s
eralara� °i eeoae sar�"s�s
irla� lee• *raw
�s•es •ewe awms
lrrrr� ,re i ie� a w m �
Mo .�a�� �ver�jT,, ,were• �raea`W .a.as. �
�i.Bi.JL bJ�rI{J �er+alarle eaeaee.. o°{ sw``6
rrr®r® .aa
�rrr� ON!, ®6%
r!!f »aw'll ;NUJ
4;w@
,arp •ae YrK
lreeer! aseeeraooae . �
WEDNESDAY, MAY 3 lr !!a®arl�a �a+ea�rRr�wio s�emw®web
!r!!!e W '_e_e_e.re•w a w w w . w
10:00 - 12:00 Noon Registration
12:00 Noon Opening Luncheon
Keynote address by Francis Naftalin
2:00 - 5:00 Coping with Change Skill Development Session
Two sets of concurrent sessions 2:00 and 3:30 P.m.
*Managing Conflict in a Changing World
*Organizational Change: Making It and Taking It
*Citizen Participation:: Problems and Potential
*Nuts and Bolts of Organizational Cooperation
*Working Together: Men and Women
*Avoiding Professional Burnout
*The Now To°s of Citizen Participation
`Overcoming Barriers to Communication
%Career/Life Planning: Strategies for Mid Career-Renewal
5:00 - 6:00 Social Hour
6:30 Banquet
8:30 Dance
THURSDAY, MAY 4
9:00 Minnesota Demographics on the Move
9:45 Implications for the Good Life in Minnesota
Panel Discussion
11 :00 Concurrent Workshop Sessions
*Aspects of Literacy in Minnesota: Definitions, Dimensions,
Delivery Systems
*Reaching Special Adult Group:: The Disadvantaged, Mentally
Retarded, Learning Disabled
*The Older Adult: Special Needs for Education
*Developing the COCa MUD i t.y: A Process
*Changing Leisure: Patterns
12: 15 Luncheon
Technological Changes and Their Implications for
Education and Leisure
1 :45 Concurrent: Workshop Sessions (two sets)
*Resource Networking/Educational Brokering
-The Impact of Energy on Programming
*Accountability: Measuring Effectiveness in the Human Services
%The Multi-Service Center: Vacant School Buildings, New
Construction
*It's A Matter of Access--Breaking the Architecture Barrier
*Forecasting the Future: Can Wei Should We?
*The Future of Minnesota's Energy
*The Older Adult: Programming and Promotional Strategy
*The Older Adult: Existing Programs
4:00 Conference Wrap-Up
The Move from Talk to Action
SPEAKERS AND WORSHOP LEADERS
CHARLES BROTEN, Coordinator, Older Adults Program, University of Minnesota Morris
LEE COLDY, Training Director, Colby, Sands and Associates
WILLIAM COX, Co-Director, Multisource
SCOTT ERICKSON, President, Futures Systems
JEAN HAMMINK, Executive Director, Minnesota Literacy Council , Inc.
ROBERT HANLE, Director, Career/Life Planning, Metropolitan State University
JOHN HOYT, JR. , Deputy Director, Central Solar Energy Research Institute
DONNA KNIGHT, Human Resources Planner, State Planning Agency
JIM KRAMER, Director of Community Education, St. Louis Park
DAVID LANEGRAN, Associate Professor and Chairman, Geography Department,
Macalester College
RAY LUNDGREN, Adult Group Advisor, Minnesota Association for Children with
Learning Disabilities
ROGER MC CANNON, Director, Continuing Education and Regional Programs,
University of Minnesota Morris
ANDREA MOLBERG, Assistant Progessor of Counseling Psychology, College of St. Thomas
FRANCIS NAFTALIN, President, Minneapolis Library Board; former co-chair Commission
on Minnesota's Future
MARY NOTERMANN, Executive Director, Southside Services for Retarded Citizens
ROSEMARIE PARK, Assistant Professor, Adult Education, University of Minnesota
ARMAND PAULSON, Director of Parish Support of the National Staff of thq American
Lutheran Church
DAN PATTERSON, Director of Community Education, Worthington
GRETA PLOETZ, Director of ABE and Adult Special Programs, Mounds View
Community Education
HAZEL REINHARDT, State Demographer, State Planning Agency
MARLIN WOLLWAGE, Assistant Director, Community Social Planner, Suburban Community
Services
JOHN SCHULTZ, Chairman Department of Recreation, Park, and Leisure, University of
Minnesota
STEVE ROOD, Planner, Community Health and Welfare Council
A joint conference sponsored by. Minnesota Community Education Association
Minnesota Recreation and Park Association
Minnesota Association of Continuing Adult Education
In cooperation with: Minnesota Community College System
State Department of Education
MINNESOTA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION
415 Blake Road North
Suite 6
Hopkins, Minnesota
933-3573
If TO: MRPA MEMBERS
FROM: RICHARD J. JORGENSEN
If
If
ItDATE: APRIL 7, 1978
ii f
nirpa SUBJECT: NEWSLETTER
If
If
Ii
IR I "COMMUNITY EDUCATION" LEGISLATION ADVANCES
House and Senate committees responsible- for elementary and secondary education are
ii considering ""community education" legislation which could heavily impact public
ii recreation systems.
it
ii The proposed "Commurtity Schools and Comprehensive Community Education Act of 197811
tE would extend and expand the Community Schools Act of 1974 which expires this year.
If The bills, S. 2711 and a similar unnumbered amendment in the House, are being
11
considered as a part of other amendments to the Elementary and Secondary Education
DP Act.
if
11 The House Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary and Vocational Education completed
11
11 its markup of the comprehensive bill , H.R. 11282, earlier this week. The full
it
House Committee on Education and Labor is expected to begin markup on April 4.
S. 2711 was introduced by Senator Harrison Williams (D-NJ) chairman of the Senate
si Committee on Human Resources. Rep. Dale Kildee (DMI) introduced the House amendment.
Portions of both proposals are of particular concern to lay and professional recreation
ii leaders. Major features of S. 2711 include:
CI
�,A statement of "findings and policy" which declares that "the school is the
principal institution for the delivery of services and may be the best instrument
for the coordination of fragmented services...";
ss *A broad definition of "community education" which includes recreation, cultural
activities and aging prograims, among others;
*Authorization of a 5-year, $240 million grant program to state education agencies
it
(with 80 percent passed on to local education agencies) for community education
si activities;
*Authorization of a 5-year, $45 million program for colleges to ""train teachers
who have not been able to find teaching (positions) and to retrain teachers who
have been laid off. .."" to perform community education functions.
The House Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary and Vocational Education chaired
if by Rep. Carl D. Perkins (D-KY) has accepted the Kildee "community schools" amendment.
it
This version states that the school "is a primary institution for delivery of
A,
services" (S. 2711 refers to schools as The primary institution. . .) , and substantially
Ii modifies language giving HEW authority to- provide grants to employ or retrain
teachers unable to find work. The Kildee amendment would make grants available
if for "training programs to institutions of higher education (to) assist full-time
ii training for personnel ... engaged in or who intend to engage in community
Itl education programs."
ii S. 2711 is being considered by the Senate Subcommittee on Education, Arts and
13 Humanities which is expected to begin markings shortly after the Easter recess.
Q
it
The subcommittee is chaired by Senator Claiborne Pell (D-RI ) .
fl
id
tt
If NKPA Executive Director John H. Davis said the proposals could "cause duplication and'
11 ii
t adversely affect the quality and delivery of comprehensive recreation and park
11 sery ices."
I il Davis said any federal legislation dealing with community education issues should:
ii Provide specific authority for public park and recreation systems to have a major
11 role in community education planning-, require that school systems receiving federal
if education aid make facilities available to public park and recreation agencies for
it recreation and other functions; prohibit the establishment of community edcuation
!1 programs and overlapping organizational structures which duplicate existing recreation
I agencies; allow public recreation agencies to be direct receipients of federal
i
11 t 11 community education" assistance; and require state and local education agencies
1
if to utilize persons with professional training in recreation when recreation is a
ii major component of community education programs.
rt
rt
if Reprinted from NRPA Washington Action Report of March 24, 1978.
ii
I
f MRPA TO OFFER TICKETS TO KICKS GAMES
ii i
Wednesday, June 28 and July 12 will be MRPA nights at Met stadium. We are reserving
ii a large block of tickets for both nights. Further information to follow in the
I next mailing when final arrangements have been completed.
si
rr
ii 1978 CONFERENCE CHAIRPERSON DELIVERS
if
11 Marcia and Rick Pease are the proud parents of a girl named Jamie, born
if
it March 30. Last year's conference chairperson, Gretchen Blank and husband Eric,
11
6 also had a daughter born during her term.
tt
tt
ii JOHN PERKOVICH APPOINTED TO STATE COMMUNITY SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCIL
if
Past MRPA President Jack Perkovich has been appointed by Governor Perpich to represent
ii the first congressional district on the State Community School Advisory Council.
st
it
ii MRPA TO SPONSOR THE HERSHEY NATIONAL TRACK AND FIELD YOUTH PROGRAM IN MINNESOTA
if Details regarding the state 'track and field program will be forthcoming. The
ii state meet will be held by July 4 so community preliminary meets, if necessary,
it will be held in June.
ii
LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE IS DEVELOPING LEGISLATIVE PLAN
ii Ben Withhart, Legislative Chairperson, reports his committee has a target goal to have a
ii legislative plan to be adopted at our annual conference in September. Members will
ii have the opportunity to give input to this plan either by phone, mail or at a meeting
ii for the membership to be held hopefully before June. Several Board/Commission members
have been active on this committee including Pat Buettner and Mary Kenny from
it,11
Bloomington, and Nancy Anderson from Minneapolis.
tY
fl
II
ft
it
Metropolitan Council
0#" 300 Metro Square Building
o
Q Seventh Street and Robert Street
0 4 � Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
w Telephone(612) 291-6453
o� w° Office of the Chairman
yip, 'tiS
�IN Ctt
April 11, 1978 Metropolitan Council Referral
File Nos. 5715 - 5720
To Whom it may concern:
The Co ,
unties of Anoka Carver, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott,
and Washington have jointly submitted their proposed
master plans for the disposal of diseased tree waste to
the Metropolitan Council for review and approval , as
required by the Metropolitan Solid and Hazardous Waste
Act (Minnesota Statutes, 1976) .
The plans will be reviewed by the Council ' s Solid and
Hazardous Waste Management Advisory Committee at 2 : 30P .M.
on Tuesday, April 18 , 1978, in the Metropolitan Council
Chambers. The Physical Development Committee of the
Council will consider the Advisory Committee 's report on
April 27 , 1978 , at 1: 30 P .M. The Metropolitan Council
will take action on the proposed plans at 4 :00 P .M. on
May 11, 1978 . -
You are cordially invited to attend these meetings or
to submit written statements regarding the proposed
master plans for the Council ' s consideration. questions
regarding the content of the master plans should be direc-
ted either to the individual counties or to the offices
of the Metropolitan Inter-County Council at Suite 265 ,
Metro Sauare Building, St.. Paul , Minnesota 55101 (tele-
'1ho e: 222-1749) . if you llay.e questions regarding the
Metropolitan Council 's review of the master plans , please
contact Lynne Takemoto of my staff at 291-6412 .
Sincerely,
e ohn Boland
Chairman
RATE INCREASE NOTICE Copy ;
NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
PUBLIC HEARING
Public Hearings will be held commencing at 2:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m.
Thursday, Apri,l _ 20, om o
,1.918., in the Large Hearing oT ���he Public
Service Commission, American Center Building, l60,_,EA.5#;, .Kellogg Boulevard,
St. Paul , Minnesota, concerning Northwestern Bell Telephone Company' s
application for a general rate increase. Any persons who wish to make
statements before the Hearing Examiner regarding such concerns as
Northwestern Bell 's adequacy and quality of service, level of rates, or
other relevant matters may appear. It is not necessary to be repre-
sented by an attorney at this Public Hearing.
Northwestern Bell filed a general rate increase with the Minnesota
Public Service Commission on December 2, 1977. The Commission must
decide by December 2, 1978, how much of an increase, if any, will be
approved. The public hearings will provide an opportunity for persons
affected by the proposed increase to present their views.
The increases total about 18.5% and are designed to increase North-
western Bell 's annual revenue in_T n"ne`ota by $49.6 million ($21 .2
million after taxes) . They are part of a $63.2 million increase pro-
posed to the Minnesota Public Service Commission which would increase
rates about 21 .5%.
The rate changes described in this notice have been requested by
Northwestern Bell Telephone Company. The Minnesota Public Service Com-
mission may either grant or deny the requested changes, in whole or in
part, and may grant a lesser or greater increase than that requested
for any class or classes of service.
Evidentiary hearings for formal intervenors will be held at 9:30
a.m. in the Large Hearing Room, Public Service Commission, Seventh Floor,
American Center Building, 160 East Kellogg Boulevard, St. Paul , Minnesota,
on the dates listed below:
May 1-5 Cross-examination of Company witnesses
June 19-23 Cross-examination of Intervenors
July 24-28 Cross-examination of Rebuttal Witnesses
Information about the hearings may be obtained from the Office of Hearings
Examiner, 1745 University Avenue, St. Paul , Minnesota 55104.
The proposed rate schedules and a comparison of present and proposed
rates may be examined by the public during normal business hours at
the Department of Public Service, 790 American Center Building, 160
East Kellogg Boulevard, St. Paul , and at Northwestern Bell 's office
at 70 W. Fourth Street, St. Paul , Minnesota.