The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApril 17, 1979 TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ.REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APRIL 17 , 1979 Mayor Harbeck presiding 11 Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 21 Communications : a] Robert Polk b] Robert Koch c] Shakopee Community Services d] Metro Council Conference e ] Woodlake Sanitary Service , Inc . 31 Liaison reports from Councilmembers : a] Cncl .Hullander from the Shakopee Fire Department b] Cncl .Lebens from Recreation Board c] Cncl .Reinke from Shakopee Public Utilities Commission d] Cncl .Ward from Planning Commission and Jt. Seven Man Committee e ] Cncl .Leroux from Shakopee School Board f ] Mayor Harbeck from Scott County Board of Commissioners 41 RECOGNITION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANYONE PRESENT IN THE AUDIENCE WHO DESIRES TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA! 51 Old Business : a] Third Avenue Watermain - Webster to Harrison Streets Res . No . 1383 - Ordering Preparation of A Report b] Application by John Clinkenbeard for Taxicab License-tbld 3/6 61 Planning Commission Recommendations : 71 Routine Resolutions and Ordinances : a] Res . No. 1391 - Amending 1979 Pay Schedule b] Res . No. 1392 - Terminating the Deferrment on an Assessment c ] Res . No. 1393 - Supporting Legislation for the Prior Lake- Spring Lake Watershed District Outlet Project Funding 81 New Business : a] 7 : 30 P.M. - Mr. Charles Weaver, Chrm. , Metropolitan Council b] 8: 30 P.M. - Public Hearing on proposed assessment of Demolition Charges - Res . No. 1394 c ] 9: 00 P.M. - Update on Tahpah Park, Ken Oksendahl , Shakopee Jaycees d] 9 : 15 P.M. - Application for Off Sale 3. 2 Beer License by C & 0 Inc . - 409 East 1st Avenue e ] Requesting a public hearing on PCA sludge farm permit - Res . 1395 f ] Standard Oil Law Suit g] K-Mart Project - Agreement h] Board of Review: 1) Motion to continue 2) Motion to close 3) Motion that the findings of the Board of Review be approved and sent to the County Auditor for certification i] Industrial Revenue Bonds - Res . No . 1396 j] City Engineer ' s status report on public improvement projects k] Award bids on 1 ] Sewer Television Inspection System 2] Trailer Mounted Sewer Rodding Machine 11 Appointment to the Community Services Board - Expiring term of Gloria Vierling m] Approve payment of the bills n] Proposed Amusement Tax Bill o ] Pre-Built Homes - Modular p] Tax Increment lobbying expenses q] Proposed ordinance change for amusement rides inspection r Part time building inspector s ] Recommended improvements to city hall 91 Consent Business : 101 Other Business : 117, Adjourn Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator RECEIVED MAR 2 $ 1979 905 Market St. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Shakopee, MN 55379 March 23, 1979 Mayor and City Council City of Shakopee Shakopee, MN 55379 Gentlemen: I would like to request that a 4-way stop be installed at the inter- section of Market Street and Shakopee Avenue, replacing the two "yield" signs currently on Market Street and the two "dip" signs on Shakopee Avenue . This is strictly a residential neighborhood. It is two blocks from Pearson Elementary and, therefore, has many children playing and traveling to and from school and playgrounds. Some of these children travel Shakopee Avenue to avoid the heavy traffic of 10th Ave. I have witnessed many cars traveling in the 50 MPH range on both streets not to mention those in excess of 30 MPH. The dip, which is at the west edge of the intersection, is nothing more than a small bump at the speeds of some of the cars. I complained to the Police Dept. late last summer but I have seen a patrol car only on a couple of occasions cruising through the area. I am amazed that there has not been more accidents at this intersection. It is my belief that a 4-way stop would slow down the traffic and deter some to other streets such as county road 17 and 10th Ave. , both of which are 4 lane streets. I hope this can be done before this intersection adds to the statistics . Sincerely, 1,*o,4AO� Robert Polk r LISTED BELOW ARE NEIGHBORS WHO AGREE WITH ME ON THE ABOVE* e6 5 sa ' . Jk 28 ApAil3, 1979 Lao Spuvue z Shakopee City. Engin.eea C t.ta Hail- Shakopee, Mirznejo.ta 55379 Oeaa MA. Spine, : Last f a U the ci tq .i.»ued a build g pew t to my ne i.ghbo2 f oz a gaAage. The foundation .i j in and it appea" to be at lea i t 30' wide. The pnob.tem to .this: Out a.Ltect wad nevea faUy. deve.Loped becaaAe a .tom a dead end and the .Lot next doo2 waj vacant. (Theje aae the 2ea.4onw the city gave me jeveAai geaaA ago. ) MV lot .fine coveu one half the aiieg, oA you might jack, come] to the middle of the grtave.t in the aUeg. 4cco2ding. .to the VaUey View Addition Uo.t, .theae .cam an 8' )tight of wag on which the cente2 of the atieg jhoadd be laid between paoperc tq t ne4. 9 wouCd appAectate it veAuy much .tf the ci,tV wouLd move .thij a,U.eu overt to i t j pAope z place .4o .thorough .tnaf f i,c .cam maintained on ci N aright of way. yours a j j iAton t4 have .cnf o,7med me that the a.Ltecq iA .indeed not .in .ita pzopen pojiti_on. l.leaae keep me abaeaA.t of anq devetopement j on above mentioned .j tuati.on. your .tozu lV, 2oberrt L. Koch 923 •6. 8th Avenue Shakopee, Minne4o.ta SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY SERVICES 129 East Levee Drive Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 March 19, 1979 Mr. Doug Reeder City Hall 129 East lst Ave. Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Dear Mr. Reeder: Last year, the Shakopee Recreation Board (now Shakopee Community Services) held a community open house called "Shakopee Showcase". All citizens were invited to come to the Senior High School for a special evening with representatives of community organizations and community service agencies-4 They came to observe demonstrations, exhibits, dis- plays, and to register for Recreation Board activities. There was excellent entertainment and refreshments for all. It was an oppor- tunity for area citizens to learn more about the leisure opportunities available to them. Participation in this event was very good, and we billed it as a success that must be repeated again this year. Your organization is invited to join us for our "Community Show- case 1979" on Monday evening, May 7, 6:30-8:30 p.m. at the Shakopee Senior High School. You may have a booth, demonstrations or whatever. Let us know what you need in the way of space and special equipment. Everyone that participates will be assigned an area with a table and identification sign. Please call us at 445-2742 to confirm your interest in participating. We hope many Shakopee Community Organizations will join with us again this year for a very special night. We will handle all publicity and scheduling of this event. Mark it on your calendar, MONDAY, MAY 7, 6:30 - 8:30 p.m. We look forward to having you join with us to better inform Shakopee residents of the leisure opportunities available to them. We will be in touch with further details. Sincerely, U ") Cindy Walz, Program Supervisor lorge . Muenchow, Director P.S. Please notify us by Wednesday, April 11th, of your intent to participate. Doug: ,Z C, In the past the City has had space publicizing= Dutch Elm Disease, Hwy #169 Bypass, Infra Red Films etc in addition to parks & recreation related programs. In addition to the above it would seem to me that the Comprehensive Plan would be extremely appropriate this year. A nice sized booth with council and staff members present to answer questions would be in order. etc. What think ye? G.F.M. i �� J � � f� �'`^✓ PROGRAM 9:30 a.m. Registration OPENING ADDRESS: 10-10:30 a.m. "The Fully Developed Area: Directions of Change"by Charles Weaver,chairman, Metropolitan Council SESSION ONE: 10:30-12 noon "Reinvestment: Results or Promises! Promises!" Panelists: George Latimer,mayor,City of St.Paul Dick Krier,city planner,Richfield Herb Trader,president,City Venture Corporation Tom Berg,former legislator,former chairman,Minnesota House Local and Urban Affairs Committee LUNCH: 12-1:30 p.m. On your own at nearby restaurants. (Take a downtown walking tour.) SESSION TWO: 1:30-3:00 p.m. "Constraints on Revitalization: How Important are the Intangibles?" Panelists: Jerry Allen,president,Criteria Associates Laurie Clugg,chairperson,Association of Metropolitan School Districts, member,Hopkins Board of Education Dick Brustad,president,Nationwide Housing Corporation Moderator: Marcia Bennett,chairperson,Physical Development Committee, Metropolitan Council SESSION THREE: 3:15-4:30 p.m. "Recycling Communities: More Issues than Answers?" Panelists: Sonia Sands,author,"Population Change Due to Housing Renovation in St.Paul's Ramsey Hill Area." Glenn Hanggi,member,St.Paul Planning Commission; member,District 5 Planning Council;former president,Phalen Area Community Council,St.Paul Van White,member,Board of Directors,Phyllis Wheatley Community Center,Minneapolis Moderator: Joan Campbell,chairperson,Human Resources Committee, Metropolitan Council Cost:$2 a person.RSVP to the Council by April 26 by calling 291-6464 if you will be attending. 4°titan O THE CONDITION OF THE OLDER PART OF THE REGION: WHAT DO THE VITAL SIGNS SHOW? You are cordially invited to attend a Metropolitan Council State of the Region conference to analyze changes occurring in the Fully Developed part of the Region. Saturday, April 28, 1979 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The Cortile Landmark Center 75 W. 5th St., St. Paul A .e - Woodlake Sanitary Service , Inc. A Subsidiary of Browning-Ferris Industries,Inc. WASTE SYSTEMS DIVISION April 10, 1979 R FCEINIr9D APR 11 1913 Mr. Walter Harbeck Mayor OF SHAKOPEE City of Shakopee CITY 500 Jackson Park Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mr. Harbeck: We have been advised that the City Council of Shakopee has tabled Resolution No. 1378 which would have terminated our contract with the City, thereby allowing us to continue to serve the residents of Shakopee. You will not regret your decision. To assure the elimination of any problems , we are in the process of imple- menting the proposals outlined in our letter to you of March 28, 1979. These actions should go a long way in the elimination of missed collections. I am also assuming personal responsibility for the collection efforts in your city and in the event there are any problems, I urge you to call me at the office at 941-5174 or after hours at home at 888-4276. These numbers may also be given to any citizen who has a problem and is not getting the proper attention from our office. In case of my absence from the office, all communications should be directed to Ken Tritz. On behalf of Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc. , I wish to thank you for giving us the opportunity to continue our service to the City of Shakopee. Rodney B. Kager Vice President RBK/pjb cc : City Council Members .✓8ouglas Reeder, City Administrator Gregg Voxland, Finance Director Julius Coller, City Attorney 9813 Flying Cloud Drive / Eden Prairie, Minn. 55343 / 941-5174 Ak MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Douglas S . Reeder RE: 3rd Avenue Watermain DATE: April 12 , 1979 The City Council has requested that the staff come up with a method of paying for needed water line in 3rd Avenue without assessing now the benefited property owner. Before the Tuesday Council meeting, Rod , Jack, Lou and I will meet and try to come up with the alternatives for your consideration. I would like to make several comments at this time for your weekend consideration. If there is a way to, in effect, "defer" these assessments then the following must be considered . 1 . Shakopee has not , to my knowledge, deferred assessments in the past,and this would be a very serious new direction for the City to take - no matter how you go about it. 2 . One of the greatest strengths which the City of Shakopee has is that the financial dealings of the City, to this point, have been very conservative , particularly in the area of bonding for public improvement . The trend of having the developer put in his own improvements , and paying for them, has been set and I think should be continued . The problem that the more aggressive growth oriented communities -- Prior Lake , Minnetonka and Eden Prairie, are running into is that they are front ending massive public improvement projects on the hope the future development will pay for them. They are then in the position that they must force, and encourage , development to pay for their improve- ments . Shakopee, on the other hand, has been able to enjoy a modest growth record with very short term bonding and no requirements to finance the projects through hook up charges . There are some big advantages to maintaining this posture, even though we are now faced with a major sewer trunk east of the old town. 3 . I have a big concern that any concept which does not require the benefited property owner to pay their share of the assessment , when the project is constructed , is bad and will set a bad example . Mayor and Council 3rd Avenue Watermain Page Two 4 . This area is not unique in its flow deficiencies . Any policy set here may want to be used elsewhere to convert other deficiencies ,and the money to defer assessments must come either from the Utility Commission, or the City, and I do not believe that either agency can afford to finance the projects needed throughout the City. I have asked the City Engineer to study the entire City to determine where all of the deficient flow areas are, however, this report has a lower priority than some other projects and will not be available for several months . 5 . It is my feeling that in this case the City Council has two choices . First let me tell you what is somewhat unique in this instance . Here we have a project which serves two functions . First, it loops the system and secondly, it provides service to property owners not now served. We will be faced with many instances where the loop does not provide service to property not now served . Choices A. ) Install the improvement which loops the system and serves property not now served and assess it against the benefiting properties . B . ) Do not install the improvement until everyone is ready for it . In this case you will be saying that no further multiple family structures will be permitted until the project is installed and you will be delaying a needed system improvement . DSR: lw , t ; � . . .,.;� 4 ',fit �„ wh l ��a'`" '1 ste "S{ 'ii T�� .;?�'� � �;)�I y.►�r... RESOLUTION NO. 1383 A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF IMPROVEMENT - (Third Ave . , Webster to Har WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve Third Avenue between Webster 4 and Harrison by watermain and sanitary sewer and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes , Chapter 429. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the proposed improvement be referred to for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with alloonvenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in conncection with some other improvement , and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee , Minnesota, held this 3rd day of April, 1979. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of April , 1979. MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Douglas S. Reeder RE: Taxicab License , John Clinkenbeard DATE: April 10, 1979 At the public hearing on March 6th concerning the request for a taxicab license for John Clinkenbeard, the City Council had request- ed that the police reports concerning this individual be released to the Council . The applicant had agreed to this request, however , the Chief of Police has reviewed the regulations concerning the disclosure of this information and finds that he is not able to release it even with permission from the individual concerned. He can only release the information contained in his memo. The City Council will therefore have to consider this license application based on the following: 1. Is there a need for another taxicab company in Shakopee 2 . Is this company large enough to provide effective service for Shakopee 3. Is the company of good business reputation The Council may want to hold up on any further taxicab licenses until the need is determined after the current licensee has begun full operation. One benefit of the taxicab license process is to insure good service by the operation of a good strong company. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council not issue another taxicab license at this time for the following reasons : 1 . Allow time for the current licensee to begin operation and get established 2 . The proposed licensee is a one cab operation which may not be sufficient to provide good service . DSR/jsc CC: J. Clinkenbeard MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Douglas S. Reeder , City Administrator RE: Salary Increases DATE: April 12 , 1979 It is recommended that the following salary increases be made effective following completion of the six month probationary period: Current Proposed City Engineer $23,500 $25,000 Finance Director $19,000 $20,500 Receptionist (Nancy Engler) $ 7 ,196 $ 7 , 904 The City Engineer was hired with the understanding that his salary would be increased to $24, 500 after six months of employment. It is now recommended, that based on his excellent performance , that his salary be increased to $25,000 instead. The Finance Director was hired at $19,000 with the understand- ing that his salary would be reviewed after six months. His performance has been very good and I am recommending that his salary be increased to $20, 500. This still puts him below the former Finance Director and below people in other cities doing the same job; however, I feel it is a sizable increase for now and he will be eligible for another increase in six months . The receptionist ' s salary is the same as previously approved, after six months for this position. DSR/jsc MEMO TO: Douglas S . Reeder , City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, Deputy City Clerk RE: Deferred Special Assessments DATE: April 12 , 1979 In 1967 assessments were levied against properties benefitted by the off street parking lots which were put in that year. Assess- ments on some properties were deferred until such time as the properties are converted to a commercial use . The property across from the post office, at 148 So. Sommerville , is being built upon for a retail automovile sales and service facility and the deferred assessments should now become due . As we discussed with, and which was recommended by, the City Attorney Mr. Coller, the Council may now adopt a resolution terminating the deferment of these assessments , making them now due and payable , and the property owner then so notified. It is recommended that the Council now adopt Resolution No. 1392 , terminating the deferment of 1967 off street parking lot special assessments . jc CITY OF SHAKOPEE INCORPORATED 1670 129 E. First Ave., Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612)445-3650 J, r • March 26 , 1979 Mr . Charles R. Weaver Chairman Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building 7th & Robert Streets St . Paul , MN 55101 Dear Mr. Weaver : We are pleased that you have accepted our invitation to join us at a City Council meeting on April 17th. As you have requested , I will list the items which we will be interested in discussing with you. 1 . The Sludge Farm proposed for Shakopee by MWCC. 2 . The pollution problem with C. I . 3 . The proposed Shakopee Bypass . 4 . The proposed Jackson Interceptor . 5 . The proposed high level bridge across the Minnesota River . 6 . O'Dowd Lake Regional Park proposal . 7 . The Comprehensive Planning process . I will be happy to have our City staff provide you with any information on these matters which you may need . Again, we look forward to having you join us at our meeting. Sincerely, Walt C. Harbeck Mayor WCH/jiw b pp rl �� a r fi o f t�" r o g r c s An 9n.—I(1nnnAuniw C.nnlnvni Y PcL TAHPAH PARK DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1978 PROGRESS REPORT AND 1979 OBJECTIVES KEN OKSENDAHL - CHAIRMAN SHAKOPEE JAYCEES Memo To: Common Council of the City of Shakopee From: The Shakopee Jaycees Park Development Committee - Ken Oksendahl , Chairman Subject: 1978 Progress Report and 1979 Project Objectives Background The Shakopee Jaycees have now been involved in this development effort for over six years . The Common Council of the City of Shakopee at their January 11, 1972 Meeting granted permission for the Shakopee Jaycees to co-ordinate development of this new recreational facility. In the beginning, the Corp of Engineers were involved with the initial road building, however the total project proved to be beyound their capabilities. In 1973 a promotional flyer was developed to interest corporations in becoming involved in this project. Once these corporations became involved the project started to move. The magnitude of this project is beyond the immediate resources available within our organization. Our strategy is based upon co-ordinating a total community effort involving city offcials, parks department, Softball Association, Jaycee Women, and other interested civic or community organizations. Our primary goal is to provide direction and co-ordination of all work and funding TAHPAH PARK 1978 BUDGET INCOME PROPOSED ACTUAL Chapter Appropriations $9, 500 $9,500 Softball Tournament (beer sales) 1 ,000 260 City Park Funds 5,000 5,000 Total Income $15,500 $14,760 EXPENSES Sign Construction 200 150 Tree Transplant 200 153 Completion of Restrooms/Concession 1 ,000 1 ,450 Fence for Field # 3 (outfield) 2,200 2,265 Sewer and water 8,600 N/A Sod for Field # 7 3,300 N/A Total Expenses $15,500 $4,018 Carryover to 1979 $10242 N/A = Project was not run � � v TAHPAH PARK DEVELOPMENT 1978 PROGRESS REPORT During the Summer of 1978 we accomplished a majority of the objectives that were scheduled for completion one or two years ago. This so-called clean-up year used a minimum of budgeted dollars giving us a carry-over of funds for next years extensive park development plans (see 1979 objectives) . The following Projects were completed due entirely to the continuing efforts of the Shakopee Jaycee body: A. Transplanted fifty trees to the Park May 17, 1978. Thanks to the City of Shakopee who purchased those trees , we may someday have trees large enough to sit under and watch good sporting events. B. Completed the siqn at the entrance to the Park. Many favorable comments have been received due to the fact that the project is now complete. C. Completed the block laying inside of the Bathroom/Concession facility. We are now ready for hook-up to city water and sewer. D. Completed the installation of the burglar alarm system to all doors of the concession stand. E. 95% complete with installation of the electric beer cooler purchased by the Softball Association. F. Received updated estimates on a water and sewer system from the City of Shakopee. -G. Received updated estimates on lighting the park complex. +s . v w TAHPAH PARK PROPOSED 1979 BUDGET INCOME PROPOSED ACTUAL Chapter Appropriations (Additional funds 1978) $10,000 $10,000 Chapter Appropriations (carryover from 1978) 5,742 5,742 City Park Funds (carryover from 1978) 5,000 5,000 Total Income 1978 $20,742 $20,742 Chapter Appropriations $10,000 $10,000 City Park Funds 5,000 5,000 Total Income 1979 $15,000 $15,000 Total Income $35,742 $35242 EXPENSES PROPOSED ACTUAL Install outfield fence diamond # 3 $ $ Connect beer cooler to power 100 '4 Install Cabinets in concession facility $ $ Complete electrical hookups 100 Design and Construct Baseball/Football field 15,000 Water and Sewer System 15,000 Blacktop parking lot ( 150 ft) 1 ,000 3,000 Final Grade of Diamonds 7, 8, and 9 1 , 542 Misc Park Projects —�— Total Expenses $35,742 $0 $ means no dollars involved (already paid) * means project not complete +t TAHPAH PARK DEVELOPMENT 1979 OBJECTIVES General Objectives Continue the development and construction of a 40 acre active athletic facility consisting of nine softball fields, one baseball/football field combination, and one soccer/football field combination. Complex to be accessible by a blacktop road with parking facilities for a minimum of 500 cars. All fields to be complete with sod or seeded outfields , back stop, and base pads. Lights and bleachers to be furnished as needed. A centered concession facility, also housed rest rooms will be designed and completed. Trees and shrubs to be planted as needed. In general our goal is to complete as much of the development as possible, paced only by adequate funds and/or equipment. Specific Objectives 1. Develope a comprehensive nark plan, in line with overall City Park Planning, including fencing, lighting, foot paths, concession facility, parking, etc. 2. Install outfield fence on Diamond # 3. 3. Connect the electric beer cooler to power and vent to outside. 4. Install cabinets, countertops , sink, stove, and range hood in the concession facility. 5. Complete all electrical hookup of lights, switches, burglar alarm, etc. 6. Co-ordinate the design and construction of the Baseball/Football field combination including: a. Securing necessary equipment for final grading of that field. b. Purchase and install sod and ag lime. c. Purchase and install fencing as required. Continued 7. Complete the parking lot ( 150 ft of blacktop) . 8. Connect the park to city sewer and water. Major Objective The major objective of the 1979 season is to design and construct a Baseball/Football field combination at Tahpah Park. This project will be complete by the 1980 baseball season through the efforts of the City of Shakopee, the Baseball Association, and the Shakopee Jaycees. In line with this object we hope that the City of Shakopee will allocate the necessary funds to install a water and sewer system to Tahpah Park. For a detailed estimate of the expenses for this project see the letter from the City of Shakopee dated October 26,1978. With the completion of these projects the Tahpah Park complex will be used even more to its fullest extent, including softball , baseball , football and soccer sporting events. - -CITY OF SHAK. ® FFE J INCORPORATED 1870 129 E. First Ave., Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612)445-3650 October 26, 1978 Mr . Ken Oksendahl 1157 Quincy Shakopee , Minnesota 55379 Dear Ken: I have done research on the Tahpah Park sanitary and water service , . The following is what I have compiled . 1 . A two inch service lateral from 12th Avenue to the park should suffice in water needs . The approximate distance would be 1775 feet . Now, if you would decide to go with a - PVC service line , the cost per linear foot would be 50 cents . Connections , curb box and vents would be an additional $375 . However, if you would decide to do it this way, both utilities and public works will not agree to maintain it . This is because PVC is more susceptible of cracking due to freeze ups that occur in the line due to dips that will not drain. The other alterna- tive is a two inch copper service which has more give and will expand during freeze ups . Both public works and utilities prefer to see this material used; possibly saving you money and problems in the long run. The cost of the copper is $3 per linear foot and connecting, curb box and vents are another $170. Also needed with copper line are couplings at $30 a piece . You would need 45 of these coming to a cost of $1350. As for depth, we recommend 7 .5 feet, keeping consistent with City specifications . 2 . Sanitary service would be provided with the grinder pump method. This will require the installation of two pumps , both feasible to handle full capacity, at the cost of $3450. The installation of 1775 feet of two inc,11 PVC approximately 8 .5 feet below the ground has a cost of 50 cents per linear foot . This dimension will vary according to the percent fall of the pipe ; however, it must stay one foot below the water service for health reasons . There will have to be a manhole constructed for the lift pumps and a manhole constructed at the low point in the service line . This would be necessary to drain the service lines to prevent freezing. The pump manhole would cost approximately $675 installed and the smaller service manhole approximately $450. T �r �1 �� a r ( of Pro 7 re _ s V o > > ' ?' f' Ken Oksendhal Page 2 SUMMARY OF COSTS: 1 . Water Service A) Copper 2" copper service (40 ' rolls) $ 3 .00/L. F. _ $5325 .00 6 x 2-2 saddle 20.00 Corp Locks 50.00 Valve 80.00 Valve Box 20.00 Couplings (45) 30.00 ea . = $1350.00 TOTAL $6845 .00 - B) PVC 2" pvc service $ . 50/L. F. = $ 887 . 50 Tee 100.00 Sleeve 40.00 Gate valve 120.00 Valve box 75 .00 Bleed lines or vents 40.00 TOTAL $1262 . 50 2 . Sanitary Service Pumps $3450.00 Pipe 887 .50 Manholes 1125 .00 TOTAL $5462 .50 ✓ NOTE: Labor is not included in these costs . Sincerely, Donald E . Paulus City Engineering Department DEP/jiw Proposed Sewer $ �.. Water Lines to City I ' POiJi)I NG AREA j � 1 1979 Completed Completion Com;feted ` 3 i i k Completed S laygro J ; 1979 pt. Fez Concession Completed Completion P A R K I N G L O T ` 8 (500 Car Cap.) Sim: Ln i L1979 14%10 6 Completed o on r '1 �..-. 0 r Completed has all ' 'ld Football Soccer 6 € I , I , 1 a F TP IPAt i PARK l��;l�,.)ed by the Shakopee Jaycees ;fit ti Law Offices of KRASS, MANAHAN , MEYER & KANNING Chartered Shakopee Professional Building IMETry K.M*y 1221 Fourth Avenue East Philip T.Kanniny Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612)445-5080 April 6, 1979 RED Mr. Douglas Reeder APR - 9 191/9 City Hall 129 East First Avenue CITY OF SI~1AKOPEE Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Doug: Enclosed please find a memo our research clerk has done on our rights to get involved in the PCA permit application of the MWCC for the sludge farm, and our appellate rights thereafter. At this point, I would recommend that the council authorize you to send a letter, or perhaps even consider passing a resolution, requesting both the M14CC and the PCA to notify Shakopee as to any permit application the MWCC makes to the PCA that we request not only notification but inform them that we will be requesting a public hearing on this permit process due to the fact that substantial public interests of Shakopee residents and citizens are involved. I also wonder if the permit process might not be the best time to interject another party. I am thinking specifically of an adjacent land owner making the same requests of the PCA to get involved in the permit process. Bev Koehnen would be an excellent choice. I am concerned that we don't get bounced out somehow simply because we are a municipality. I don't think that would happen but better safe than sorry. I still haven't heard anything from Lennertz on our motion and will get back to you as soon as I do. Yours very tr y,/. KRASS, ,- EYER & KANNING hil Krass PRK:pmh Enclosures • �( .;tom INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Rod FROM: Trevor DATE: March 30, 1979 SUBJECT: Shakopee Sludge Farm I. FACTS The judge in the Shakopee Sludge Farm case has determined that the Waste Control Commission can proceed to dump sludge in the City of Shakopee without Shakopee's approval , after having met all the requirements of the Pollution Control Agency. The next step is going to be for the Waste Control Commission to apply to the Pollution Control Agency for a permit to dump the sludge. II. ISSUES. A. What permit(s) must be obtained by the Waste Control Commission before it may dump sludge in the City of Shakopee? R. What regulatory procedure will be utilized by the Pollution Control Agency to consider the Waste Control Commission's application for a permit to dump sludge in the city of Shakopee? C. What must the City of Shakopee do to insure that it will be notified by the Pollution Control Agency of its actions with regard to the processing of the Waste Control Commission's permit application? D. What must the City of Shakopee do to appear in proceedings before the Agency as an interested party? E. What must the City of Shakopee do to make a comment upon preliminary determination made by the Pollution Control Agency? F. What must the City of Shakopee do to petition for a public hearing on the Waste Control Commission's permit application? G. What must the City of Shakopee do to appeal decisions of the hearing officer prior to the final decision by the Agency? N. What procedures are available to the City of Shakopee to appeal the final decision of the Pollution Control Agency if it is aggreived thereby? I. What must the City of Shakopee do to prevent the issuance of the permit during an appeal from an adverse final agency decision? J. What procedures are available to the City of Shakopee,durs., s an appeal , to initiate a reconsideration of an adverse decision rendered by the Pollution Control Agency? -2 III. RESOLUTION OF ISSUES. A. What permit(s) must be otained by the Waste Control Commission before it may dump sludge in the City of Shakopee? Gordy Meyer, of the PCA, told me that the Waste Control Commission will be required by the Agency to obtain two permits before it may dump sludge in the City of Shakopee. Mr. Meyer cited the Water Pollution Control Regulations hereinafter referred to as W.P.C. 36, as the authority upon which the Agency will rely in making its demand for the two permits. W.P.C. 36 (e)(2)(aa) states , "Any person proposing a disposal system from which sewage, industrial wastes, or other wastes are or may be discharged to waters of the state, where the discharge is to commence after the effective date of this regulation, shall file a complete NPDES application at least 180 days before such discharge is to commence. If the applicant has filed a complete Refuse Act application prior to the enactment of the Act, such application shall be construed to be a NPDES permit application. W.P.C. 36 (e)(2)(bb) states, "A preliminary engineering report on the proposed disposal system and pollutants, and, unless waived in writing by the Director, a state disposal system permit application for the facilities shall be submitted to the Director. Final construction plans and specifications for the disposal system shall be submitted to the Director for review, and a state disposal system permit for the facilities issued by the Director and approved by the Agency prior to solicitation of any construction bids or construction of any part of the disposal system, unless the Director has, in writing, waived such requirement for good cause, and if requested in writing by the applicant," W.P.C. 36 (e)(6)(aa) states, "No person shall construct, install or operate a disposal system, or any part thereof, until an application for a state disposal system permit and plans and specifications therefor have been submitted to the Director, and a permit for such disposal system has been issued by the Director and approved by the Agency. The Director may, in writing, waive the submission of such plans and specifications, and issue a permit subject to the approval of the Agency." W.P.C. 36 (e)(7) states, In the event that a person discharges pollutants for more than one point source, a separate application shall be filed by the person for each point source discharged." B. What regulatory procedure will be utilized by the Pollution Control Agency to consider the Waste Control Commission's application for a permit to dump sludge in the City of Shakopee? W.P.C. 36 (d)(1) states, "This regulation shall govern the procedure for the issuance of NPDES permits and state disposal system permits. To the extent of any inconsistency between the provisions of this regulation and the Agency's Rules of Procedure, MRCA 1-13, this regulation shall control. Otherwise, the provisions of this regulation and the Rules of Procedure, MPCA 1-13, shall be construed to compliment each other." Mr. Meyer, I assume pursuant to this language, told me that W.P.C. 36 will be utilized by the Pollution Control Agency to consider the Waste Control Commission's application for a permit to dump sludge in the City of Shakopee. Mr. Meyer did not indicate that W.P.C. 36 (u)(5) would apply. This states that, "Notwithstanding any provision of this regulation to the contrary, unless the Director or the Agency determines that theeeis. a ` , sufficient public interest in an application, an application for a state disposal system permit which is not subject to the requirements of NPDES and does not have a flow of more than 50,000 gallons per day on any day shall not be subject to the procedural r requirements of Sections (f) , (g), (h) , or (j) of this regulation. C. What must the City of Shakopee do to insure that it will be notified by the Pollution Control Agency of its actions with regard to the processing of the Wate Control Commission's permit application? W.P.C. 36 (h)(2) provides for availability of public notice. Subdivision (aa) states that, "The Director shall mail a copy of the public notice of the permit application to the permit applicant, interested persons upon request, and those on the mailing list pursuant to Section (i ) (3) and to any other interested persons deemed by the Director to have a potentional interest in the permit application or those that may be adversely affected." W.P.C. 36 (i ) (3) (aa) states that, "Any interested person who desires to receive copies of all public notices on a state disposal system or a NPDES permit application for all proposed discharges or those in specific counties of the state as identified in this Section may request that his name be placed on a mailing list of the Agency for such information. Such a request shall be made in writing to the Director and shall be renewed annually. After 30 days' written notification to renew a request, failure to renew the request shall be just cause for the Director to remove a name from the mailing list. W.P.C. 36 (1) (3) (bb) in addition states that, "The written request of any interested person to the Director shall clearly identify the name of the person, the person's address, and the designated county or counties of the state for which the public notice of permit applications is requested." W.P.C. 36 (h) (3) (aa) - (jj) and W.P.C. 36 (i) (2) (aa) - (ff) set forth in detail the contents and information which is relayed in the public notice of a state disposal system permit or a NPDES permit application. D. What must the City of Shakopee do to appear in proceedings before the Agency as an interested party? W.P.C. 36 (d) (2) states, ". any interested person may request at any time during the period a permit application is under review and consideration by the Director that a permit application be an item on the agenda of a regular or special meeting of the Agency. The request shall be made in writing to the Director at least fourteen (14) days prior to a regular or special meeting. The Director may determine whether or not to place a permit application item on the agenda pursuant to a request. The Director shall advise the Agency of all such items he decides not to place on the agenda. The Director shall mail a copy of the regular or special meeting agenda to the person making a theurequestfshallrbeudmtoaappear placed efore the the person who made the q permitted to Agency Rules of Procedure, MPCA 13." Robert Moilanen, a special assistant Attorney General with the PCA, has advised me that it would be wise for the City of Shakopee to become involved with the Agency throughout the whole permit evaluation process. He suggested, for example, that the City of Shakopee should arrange to have its engineers meet with the engineers employed by the Pollution Control Agency to discuss the technical aspects of the permit program, the possible terms and conditions of NPDES and disposal system permits , and the monitoring, recording and reporting requirements thereunder. E. What must the City of Shakopee do to make a comment upon preliminary deter- mination made by the Pollution Control Agency? W.P.C. 36 (g) (1) provides for the preparation of preliminary determination by the Agency. It states, "The Director shall make preliminary determinations regarding a completed NPDES or state disposal system permit application prior to the issuance of public notice, pursuant to this regulation, of the application. These preliminary determinations shall include a proposed determination to issue or deny a NPDES permit or a state dispoal system permit for the discharge described in the application." Subdivision (2) of this section provides for additional determinations which shall be made if the proposed determination is to issue a NPDES permit or a state disposal system permit. These include proposed effluent limitations, a proposed schedule of compliance, and a description of any other proposed restrictions or other conditions. W.P.C. 36 (g) (3) provides for draft permits. It states, "The Director shall prepare a draft permit based upon the preliminary determinations made pursuant to this section for a NPDES or astate disposal permit application." W.P.C. 36 (h) (4) provides a comment, for interested persons. Subdivision (aa) of this section states, "Any interested person, including the applicant for the permit under consideration, may within 30 days following the date of issuance of the public notice pursuant to this Section submit in writing comments on the application or determinations , or both, to the Agency. The time for public comment may be extended by the Director if he determines that such extension of time is needed to facilitate additional public comment." Subdivision (bb) of this section states that, "All comments submitted in writing by interested persons or the applicant during the comment period shall be retained and considered in the formulation of final deter- minations concerning the permit application." F. What must the City of Shakopee do to petition for a public hearing on the Waste Control Commission's permit application? W.P.C. 36 (k) (1) provides for petitions for and determination of need for public hearings. It states, "An applicant, any affected state or interstate agency, the Regional Administrator or any other interested person may, within the 3D days comment period or other applicable comment, provided after issuance of a public notice pursuant to Section (h), file a petition with the Director for a public hearing on an application for a state disposal system or NPDES permit. Any petition for a public hearing shall indicate the reason or reasons why a hearing is required, the interest in or relationship of the petitioner to the application or proposed discharge identi- fied therein, and specifically indicate which portion or portions of the application or other NPDES form or identification constitutes necessity for such public hearing. If the Agency determines that there is sufficient public interest in the application for a public hearing, it shall direct the scheduling of a hearing thereon. Instances of doubt shall be resolved, in favor of holding a public hearing." I asked Mr. Moilanen, a special assistant Attorney General with the PCA, how much public interest is "sufficient public interest" to bring about a public hearing. He stated that he could not give a definitive answer to this question, however, he assured me that from his experience he has never seen the PCA refuse a public hearing upon an issue where any public interest was involved at all. He warned, however, that this is not a total guarantee that we will be provided with a public hearing upon this matter. For the scheduling of hearings and notice requirements, see W.P.C. 36 (k) (2) and (4). G. What must the City of Shakopee do to appeal decisions of the hearing officer prior to the final decision by the Agency? The State of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Rules of Procedure, hereinafter referred to as MPCA 1-13, may be looked to with regard to this type of appeal because its provisions are construed to compliment those of W.P.C. 36. W.P.C. 36 (d) (1)• M.P.C.A. 9 (q) states that, "Any party aggrieved by a decision of the hearing officer during the course of the hearing may appeal such decision to the Agency by submitting notice of such appeal on the Agency anytime after receipt of the hearing officer's recommendation and prior to a final decision on the matter by the Agency. The notice shall be in writing and shall state with particularity the decision being appealed and the prejudice caused by the aggrieved party by such decision. The notice shall be served on all other parties to the matter, who may submit a statement in support or opposition to the appeal ." H. What procedures are available to the City of Shakopee to appeal the final decision of the Pollution Control Agency if it is aggrieved thereby? The right to judicial review, in general , is discussed in 2 Am. Jur. 2d Administra- tive Law 5 556. It states, "The 'right to judicial review` . . . is a complex of the power and right of the court to grant to review sought and right in the person who invokes the power of the court. The right to judicial review may be, as it most often is, granted by statute ." Minnesota provides two avenues of statutory rights to appeal for a judicial review of agency decisions. One method is to appeal pursuant to the provisions of the Minnesota Administration Procedure Act, found at M.S.A. Chapter 15. The alternative method of appeal is by use of one of the extraordinary writs which are now statutory. M.S.A. 515.0424 (1) provides that, "Any person agrrieved by a final decision in a contested case of an Agency . . . is entitled to judicial review thereof ". In order for the City of Shakopee to appeal pursuant to this statute, it must show (1) that it is a person as contemplated .by the statute; (2) aggrieved; (3) by a final decision; (4) in a contested case; (5) by an agency subject to the provisions of this statute. (1) The Minnesota A.P.A. does not explicitly define what is meant by *person . We may argue that the City of Shakopee, as an municipal corporation, must be construed as a person for the purposes of this Act. The reasons are two-fold; first, the powers and functions of local governments include a private power by which they are authorized to act for the advantage of their inhabitants and themselves, �CCi__ty�of Winona vs. Botzet, 169 F. 321 (1901) , and second;municipal corporations are designed ultimately for . . . the welfare of the public and especially the communities where they are established.' 62 C.J.S. Municipality Corporation 529. This function is of carried out, " . . . by regulating or prohibiting those things which are hurtful. Nourse vs. City of Russellville, 78 S.W. 761 ( ). (2) The word "aggrieved" refers to " . a substantial grievance, a denial of some personal or property right, or the imposition on a party of a burden or obligation." In Re Getsu , 186 N.W. 2d 686 (1971). This court held that," . . . 'aggrieved party' to whom the right of appeal is granted under a statute is one who is injuriously or adversely affected by the judgment or decree when it operates on his rights of property or bears directly upon his personal interest." The City of ShakoPee may argue that the dumping of sludge, a potentially very hazardous substance, has sub- stantially aggrieved or burdened the City in its duly to protect and provide for the welfare of the public, especially the citizens of the City of Shakopee. Nourse vs. City of Russellville (supra). Moreoever, assuming the City has a direct property interest in the land upon which the sludge will be dumped, may argue that the issuance of such permits to the Waste Control Commission bears directly upon this property right. (3) The City of Shakopee must show that the decision from which they are appealing is in actuality the final decision of the Agency. W.P.C. 36 (0) (2) defines final determination. It states, Following review and consideration of tentative determin- ations or modifications of the proposed permit made pursuant to Section (g) , comments on the proposed permit received by the Director from the Regional Administrator pursuant to Section (e), comments received from the interested persons and the applicant during the 30 days comment period following public notice of the permit application as provided by Section (h), other applicable recommendations or determin- ations and, if applicable, review and consideration of the public hearing precord on an application pursuant to Section (k), the Director shall make a final S1 a and recommendation regarding the issurance of a permit which then shall be subject to the approval of the Agency. The Director may issue a emit to an a licant prior to a final decision of the Agency, but it Shall be a conditional issuance pendin final approval of the Agency. The Director shall promptly schedule on the agenda of an Agency meetings of all permits subject to approval of the Agency. The Director shall promptly notify the permitee of the Agency's final decision regarding the issuance of the permit. In making its final decision on a permit application, the Agency shall be satisfied that the conditions of a state disposal system permit or a NPDES permit proposed to be issued shall comply with an area-wide waste treatment management plan prepared pursuant to Section 208 (b) of the Act where applicable and any other requirements of the Act, Minnesota laws and all regulations and standards promulgated pursuant to the Act and such laws. The City of Shakopee, then may not appeal a conditional permit issuance to the courts. The City of Shakopee is also precluded from using an extraordinary writ to appeal such an issuance at this time due to the fact that it is not a final Agency decision. Thomas vs. Ramberg, 240 Minn. 1, 60 N14 2d 18. (4) M.S.A. 15.0411 Subd. 4 defines'`contested case as, a proceedinn before an agency in which the legal rights, duties, or privileges of specific parties are required by law or constitutional right to be determined after an agency hearing. The court in Minnesota Public Interest Reseach Group vs. Minnesota Environment Quality Council , 306 Minn. 370, 23 5 prove es c are ication o t s term. In this case a hearing which was held due to citizen petition for an environmental impact statement for construction of an exploratory copper-nickel mine was construed to be a contested case within the administrative procedure act and parties which were aggrieved by the decision were entitled to judicial review under the act. This court further indicated that a presumption exists in favor of judicial review of agency decisions in the absence of statutory language to the contrary. It seems, then, that if the City of Shakopee is successful in requiring a public hearing in the instant case, such a hearing would be construed as a contested case by Minnesota courts. If no public hearing is held we may still argue that the proceedings are definition a contested case within provided by the Act itself. P the (5) M.S.A. 15.0400 Subd. 2 defines"agency"as, " . . . any state officer, board, commission, bureau, department, or tribunal other or to adjudicate contested rthan having n statewide cases." jurisdiction and authorized by law to make It is apparent that this would apply to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. M.S.A 5116.02, Subd. 1. It appears , based on the above analysis, that the City of Shakopee will be able to utilize the Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act to obtain judicial review of an adverse decision rendered by the Pollution Control Agency. If we fail to qualify under the Act or find this alternative,,advantageous, we may seek to obtain judicial review of the Agency decision through a extraordinary writ. Section 15.0424 (1) of the Minnesota A.P.A. states that, " nothing in this Section shall be deemed to prevent resort to other means of review, regress , relief or trial de novo provided by law now or hereafter enacted." Furthermore, we may consider bringing an -eJw14 ad;on aga:rlst tl,e 0 ,for 6e 6ar a;o'y tel:e4. Administrative Agency Practice, William F. Brooks, Jr. , 31 Bench and Bar No. 8, p. 19 (Feb. 1975). Minnesota Statutes Section 116B.10•See(1) Certiorari , M.S.A. 55606.01 - .05, (2) declaratory judgment, Rules Civ. P. , Rule 57,(3) injunction, M.S.A. SS585.01 - .04, (4) mandamus, M.S.A. SS586.01 - .06, (5) prohibition, M.S.A. SS587.01 - .05. With regard to appeals to the Supreme Court, from an adverse decision by the District Court, the Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act provides in M.S. 515.0426 that, "An aggrieved party may secure a review of any final order or judgment of the District Court under Section 15.0424 or Section 15.0425 by appeal to the Supreme Court. Such appeal shall be taken in the manner provided by law for appeals from orders or judgments in the District Court in other civil cases." Therefore, the manner of appeal of adverse decisions in the District Court pursuant to Minnesota A.P.A. and statutory writs is identical . I. What must the City of Shakopee do to prevent the issuance of a permit during an appeal from an adverse final Agency decision? The Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act provides in M.S.A. S 15.0424 Subd. 3 that, "The filing of the petition shall not stay the enforcement of the Agency decision; but the Agency may do so, or the review in court may order a stay upon such terms as it deems proper.- When an appeal from a final decision is commenced under this section in any district court of this state, any other later appeal under this section such final decision involving the same subject matter shall be stayed until final decision on the first appeal ." The court in Midwest Motor Freight Bureau vs. United States 433 F. 2d 212 (8th Cir. 1970), in determining whether to grant a stay of an Interstate Commerce Commission order pending review thereof, stated that a court will consider; (1) whether the petitioner has made a strong showing that it is likely to prevail on the merits of its appeal ; (2) whether the petitioner shows that it will be irreparably injured without such relief; (3) whether issuance of the stay substantially harms other parties interested; (4) and in which direction lies the public interest. J. What procedures are available to the City of Shakopee, during an appeal , to initiate a reconsideration of an adverse decision rendered by the Pollution Control Agency? The Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act in M.S.515.0424 Subd. 5 states that, "If, before the date set for hearing, application is made to the court for leave to present additional evidence on the issue in the case, and it is shown to the satisfaction of the court that the additional evidence is material and that there were good reasons for failure to present it in the proceeding before the agency, the court may order that the additional evidence be taken before the agency upon such conditions as the court deems proper. The agency may modify its findings and decisions by reason of the additional evidence and shall file with the review in court, to become a part of the record, the additional evidence, together with any modification or new findings or decision. ,, MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Douglas S . Reeder City Administrator RE: Standard Oil DATE: April 5 , 1979 The trial date for the court case has been set for September 17th at 9 :00 AM. At the pre-trial meeting on April 4th, it became apparent that Standard Oil may be willing to reach an out-of-court settlement with the City. We will present to the City Council our recommendation on the type of settlement which we think the City Council should consider. We will need the City Council ' s concurrence in order to be able to negotiate a settlement if such is possible before the trial date on September 17th. DSR/jiw MEMO TO: City Council FROM: Douglas S . Reeder RE: K-Mart Agreement DATE: April 12 , 1979 The proposed redevelopment agreement between the City and K-Mart has been drafted by Tom Hay and will be presented to K-Mart for their review. Rod Krass ,and myself ,would like to present to the City Council an outline of that agreement to be sure that the Council is in agreement with the concepts being proposed . We will have the outline at the Council meeting. W • 1979 • BOARD OF REVIEW • • • • • • MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council Acting as Board of Review FROM: The Assessors Office RE: Board of Review - 1979 DATE: March 20, 1979 w Enclosed in this booklet is pertinent data that will assist you in your duties and responsibilities as the Local Board of Review. As you know, the cost sheets and land values implemented in 1978 ' s reassessment are still in effect for 1979 ' s assessment . Therefore , there have been no increases in estimated market values with the exception of new construction and properties that have been improved upon. The items included in the booklet are as follows : Sec . 1 The Duties and Responsibilities of the Local Board of Review and the County Board of Equalization and the Assessor ' s Responsibility to these Boards . Sec . 2 Assessment Codes . Sec . 3 Assessment Codes Definitions . Sec . 4 The Rate Sheet Presently in Effect and its Certifications . Sec. 5 The Land Value Chart and Map . Sec . 6 Verified Sales from 1977 that were Supportive of 1978 ' s Assessment Sec . 7 Depreciation Explained and Our Presently in use Depreciation Table . Sec . 8 An Example of Appreciation. Sec . 9 Summary of Property Tax Law Changes Made in the 1.978 Legislative Session. Sec . 10 Penalties for not Maintaining Standards for a Good Assessment . LM/jiw Attachment • • • Section 1 • THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW AND THE COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND THE ASSESSOR' S RESPONSIBILITY TO THESE BOARDS • • • • • THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW AND THE COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND • THE ASSESSOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO THESE BOARDS INTRODUCTION • A clear understanding of the division of responsibilities between _assessing officials and these boards will hopefully lead to greater cooperation and uniformity in the assessment of property in the state. LOCAL BOARDS OF REVIEb1 • (Minnesota statutes 274.01 ) The local board of review has the function of reviewing the current year's assessrants within the local taxing district. The torn board of each town, the council or other governing body of each village, : borough, and city constitutes the board of review (except that in some- cities, the city charter provides for a board of equalization, which performs essentially *.he same functions as a board of review). The importance of the local board of review cannot be stressed enough..' • This is t•.-here valuation really starts and the responsibility 'or removal of discrepancies is at this point in that assessments are both justified and corrected if necessary+ to becomie just. It is at this point in the assessrent process t-.,here local assessors, through their participation in the local board, have an opportunity not only to view and estimna to the value of property, but to participate in the assessment process. • Equality of assassr.,ant is bbtained at the local board level . The local board r.3v ch2r.ge an individual assess^ant but may not chance an entire item or class. On the other hand, the county ooard of eaualization ehanres assess�ren=s by class or item as %..ell as handling individual • compfaints not ;,resented to a local board. A county board may not reduce an assessor-ent without increasing another assessment, within certain limits. )' , Local boards are closest to the valuation process. They are the persons P*st kno:iledceable of value in thalr co;,,;7unity. Their function, basically, is to assist the local assessor in the detarmination of market value. When a local board achieves equal assessment betvieen the property in their cor..;.unity, a state i.-ncsed blanket or percent increase will not magnify any inequities e:,i sti nn at the local level . By doing a proper job, the local board ►,A l l thus be re:rarCed locally. • ?'ARCS Jt - • The legal responsibilities of a local board of review are as follows: „ 1. The cont assessor fixe t on which each local board of review shall meet, and the local municipal shall and notice of the meeting. The board of r" • adjourn wit it 20 days after the _ nc�ce. JOT / 3 a 2. The loca aard of review reviews the_ assessmentt of district has been taxing district to see that all. taxable property re erty • properly plated on he list and shalluseevthatdit ishplacedsonrthellistytogether has been omitted, the o . with its market value. e�a�-�-�°"; '•' =k'tt hPAr com la nts from any person concerning his /3. Th assessment, and after hearings shall make the cmeetingcof thesboardaof review, • Any non-resident may, at any time before _ file written objection to his assessc'.ew� eor totthesboardrfornitshese objections must be presented by the co unt y asses consideration. ce nts; however, it j/4. Th9 1,Q�aI board of review i ha_ wer Q of assessments rude b th • �aot rrak such reductions in the o county assessor as ore uce a aggregate of assessments y more an one er Clereal errors or double assessments discovered o r o bcted by the. assessor �thout affecting the one percent review may ��limitation. _ • " 5. The board of review has parer to rail _ S5essmsnts; however, n�ty ass PCS d a -fir ivin otice of su h erence intention. Once the local board has adjourned, the countyl�boardnofeequali- to assessments shall be zation. • RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ASSESSORS TO THE LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW Local Assessom (M.S. 274.01 ) • ✓1. Shall attend. 2. Shall bring assessment books and dpmay bedshownetoy and fully "he property owner, document his valuation. The field card but a property owner may not demand to see field aids at rando . Field assessor must use discretion in revealing the contents o his • must contain sufficient information to permit both the local and county asses- sor to discuss upon a factual basis an assessment with a property owner. 3. Shall take part in the proceedings and be an active participant. . • /4. Shall not vote. • a • • • Section 2 ASSESSMENT CODES • • • • • • • :n , 6 • •----------------------------------------------------------------------T---��- +►+► ASSESSMENT CODES ►RESIDENTIAL • HOMESTEAD - WITH HOUSE - - - - - - - - - - 3-16 HOMESTEADED ADJOINING VACANT LOT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4-lb HOMESTEADEU WITr- BLIND CREDIT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3-13 • HOMESTEADED EXTRA RESIDENCE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3-11 HOMESTEADED-JOINT OWNERShIP-1 DISAULEU - - - - - - - - - - - - 3-21 HOMESTEADED-JUI14T UwNERSHIP-dUTH DISABLEU - - - - - - - - - - - 3-13 • HOMESTEADED ADJOINING 1-2-3 UNITS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4-25 HOMESTEADED ADJOINING 4 OR MURt UNITS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4-26 HOMESTEAD COMMERCIAL-RESIDENTIAL--SINGLE VALUE (SEE ALSO 4-17) 3-17 • NON-HOMESTEAU IMPROVED/PLATIEU RESIDENTIAL VACANT LOT - - - - - - 4-07 NUN-HOME5TEAD--1-2-3 UNITS - - - 4-07 NON-HOIESTEAU VACANT LOTS AUJUINING NON-HOMESTEAD 1-4-3 UNITS - 4-07 • NON-HOMESTEAU--4 UNITS OR MORE - - - - - - " - - - - - - - - - 4-08 NON-HOMESTEAD VACANT LOTS ADJOINING NON-HOMESTEAD 4 UNITS OR MORE-4-Od TITLE II -- APARTMENT 8UILOINOS - - - - - - - - - - " - - - - - 4-16 • NON-HOMESTEAD TYPE II UNDER 5 STURIES - - - - - - - " - - - " " 4-06 NON-HOMESTEAD TYPE 22 APARTMENT dUILUING FMHA FINANCED - - - - 4-24 NON-HOMESTEAD SEASONAL RECREAlIUN (HESIUENTIAL) - - - - - " - - - 2-04 • • • AA. . a AGRICULTURE HOMESTEAD--STRUCTURES WITH ENTIRE ACREAGE - -- - - - - - - - - - 1-15 • HOMESTEAD--JOINT OWNERSHIP-1 UISAULEU - - - ' - - - - - - - - - 1-21 HOMESTEAD--ADUITIO14AL LAND UP TO 160 ACRES ♦ - - - - - _ _ - - 2-03 HOMESTEAD--LAND OVER 1.60 ACRES 6UT ADJOINING THt HOMESTEAD - - - 2-OZ • NON-HOMESTEAD--LAND OF HUMESTEAU OWNERS THAT UOtS NOT ADJOIN - - l-Ol HUMESTtAJ PROPERTY HOMESTEADED EXTRA AG DWELLING (PARTNERSHIP) - - - _ _ _ _ - - 1-11 NON-HUMESTEAU--ALL T "' ' 0 HEk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2-22 • HUMESTEAU AG WITH BLIND CkEUIT - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. 1-14 • • • • .---------------------------------------------------------------------�-+ -_ • « COMMERCIAL HOMESTEAD COMMERCIAL-- FOR SPLIT LLASS•IFICATION WHICH - _ - - - 4-17 HAS RESIDENTIAL HOMESTEAv ALSO • HOMESTEAD COMMERCIAL-RESIDENTIAL--SINGLE VALUE (SLE ALSO 4-17) 3-17 NON-HOMESTEAD COMMERCIAL - - - - - NON-HOMESTEAD--NIA & PA RESORT ( 16%) - - - • NON-HOMESTEAU--MA & PA RESORT (30%) - - - - - - - - - - 4-26 NON-HOMESTEAD VACANT LAND - - - - � _ _ _ 4-14 INDUSTRIAL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUbLIC UTILITIES - • SEASONAL-RECREATIONAL-RESIDENTIAL - - - - T IMdERLAND - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEASONAL-RECREATIONAL-COMMERCIAL - - - - - - _ • • • • • • Section 3 ASSESSMENT CODES DEFINITIONS • • • • • • J • --------------------------------------------------ASSESSMENT CODES DEFINITIONS ** ** RESIDENTIAL ** • 3-16 THE FIRST $179000 LIMITED MARKET VALUE (LMV) IS FluUkED AT 20%9 THE BALANCE OF THE LMV IS FIGURE.0 AT 33 1/3%9 4-16 THIS IS AN ADJOINING HOMESTEADED VACANT LOT AND MUST BE LINKED TO A 3-16 WITH A MULTIPLE OWNERSHIP NUMBEk. IF THE PARCEL LISTED AS 3-16 IS LESS THAN $17900 LMV9 TOE 6ALANCt OF THE 179000 WILL BE ASSESSED HEkt AT 20%9 ANY VALUE • OVER 17.000 WILL bE FIGURED AT 33 1/368 3-13 THE FIRST $289000 LMV IS FIGURED AT 5%; THE 8ALANCE AT 33 1/3% WHERE BOTH JOINT UwNERS ARE DISABLED OR WHERE ONE OF THE OWNEkS • IS BLIND. (ADJACENT PKUPtRTY CUUED AS 4-16 AND L1NKEU WITH AN MO WILL ALSO BE ASSESSED AT 5% UNTIL THE TuTAL LMV RtACHES $28.060. 3-11 RESIDENTIAL EXTRA HOMESTEAD ASSESSED Al 20% UN TO $179000 • OF LMV. THE EXCESS IS ASSESSED AT 33 1/3%. THIS CODE IS USED WHERE AN OWNEk RETAINS HIS HOMESTEAD ANU ACUUIRES ANOTHER HOMESTEADED PROPERTY ON WHICH HE WILL PAY THE TAX. • THIS ALLOWS LINKING 6Y M0# OF THE TWO Pr<OPERTIES wITHOUT AFFECTIN THE ASSESSED VALUE. CALCULATION OR HOMESI'EAD CNEDIT CALCULATION OF THE OTHER PROPERTY. NORHALLY THIS PROPERTY WOULD CHA146L • CLASSIFICATION AFTER i YEAR. THIS CODE WOULD ALSO HE U$LU IF THE OWNER ONLY QUALIFIED FOR A MID-YtAR hUMESTLAO UN THIS PROPERTY. �- •-------------------- Ty I5 DISAbLE0+ 3-21 WHERE THERE IS JOINT OWNERSHIP AND ONE PAR THE PROPERTY VALUE 15 DIVIDED by 2+ THLV4 THE ASSLSSLU VALUE • 15 COMPUTED ON ONE—HALF AT 5% UP TO 514+000 AND 33 1/3% UN THE EXCESS- THE UTHLR HALF IS ASSESSED AT CO% UP To $8+500 AND 33 1/3% ON THE EXCESS• (ADJMCENT PKOFLRTY • CODED AS 4-16 AND LINKLU WITH AN MO# WILL OL SPLIT THE SAME WAY. ) LOTS ASSESSED AS RESIDENTIAL NUN-NUMESTEAU AT 401 LMV* 4-07 PLATTED • 4-07 ON E+ Two AtvD THREE UNIT NO uWELLINGS FIGURED AT 40% OF LMV. 4-07 VACANT LOTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THE ONIL+ TWO AND THREE • DWELLING LINITS AND ARt FIGUREU AT 40%• 4-08 FOUR OR MORE UNIT DWELLINGS OR VACANT SOTS WHICH APE A PAkT Of THE FOUR OR MORE UNIT UWELLINGS+ FIGUkcD AT 40%. U IS 4-18 TITLE 11 APARTMENT bUILUINGS. THE LMV OF THE LAN FIGURED AT 40% AND THt LMV OF THt STRUCTURE AT c0Lk. _ D AT 4-06 TYPE II APARTMENT BUILDINGS+ WHERE THE LAND 15 ASSESSE • 40% OF THE LMV AND THE EUILDINGS ARE ASSESSED AT 33 1/3%' -24 TITLE II tMHA FINANCED CONSTRUCTION WHr_RL THE LAND IS 4 - ASSESSED AT 40% OF THE LMV AND THE BUILDINGS ARE NSSESSEU AT 5%. • tv ------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- �.--...r�..�rw rrr-..r-- 4-25 ONE9 TWO OR THREE UNIT UwELLING WHERE THE OWNER KESIUES IN PART OF THE DWELLING. (THE VALUE OF THE OWNERS U;SIT MUST BE • ASSIGNED A 3-169 3-21 OR 3-13 COUE) . It THE VALUE ON THE OWNERS UNIT IS LESS THAN $17+ 000+ 149000 OR 289000 THEN THE BALANCE WILL HE PICKEU UP HERE AT 2025 OK 5%. ANY EXCESS • ABOVE $179000+ 1490009 OR 2B9000 WILL BL ASSESSED AT 40%. IF THE VALUES ARE E14TEREU AS 2 PARCELS THEY MUST bE LINKEU WITH AN MO#. HOMESIEAO CkEUIT WILL BE i-ARRIEU OVER. • 4-26 FOUR OR rAUKE UNIT DWELLINGS WHERE THE UWNER kESIUES IN PART OF THE DWELLING. (THE VALUE OF THE OWNERS UNIT MUST BE ASSIGNED A 3-169 3-Z1 OR 3-13 CODE) . It THE VALUE ON THE OWNERS UNIT IS LESS THAN $1790009 14.000 OR 28.000 THEN THE BALANCE WILL bE PICKEU UP HERE AT 20% OK 5%. ANY EXCESS ABOVE $179000. 1490009 UR 269000 WILL bL ASSESSED AT 40%9 IF THE VALUES ARE ENTERED AS 2 PARCELS THEY MUST of LINKED WITH AN MO#. HOME SfEAU CREDIT WILL BE MARRIED OVER. • • • • ---------------.•--•.---------------------------------------------------------- a+► AGRICULTURE *• 1-15 THE FIRST $17.000 LMV IS FIGURLU AT 16x ANU THE OLANCE OF • THE LMV IS FIGURED AT 30%9 THIS PARCEL MAY CONTAIN MORE THAN 160 ACRES. 2-03 THIS CODE 15 FOk PARCELS ADJOINING THL HOMESTEAD PkUPEHTY WHERE THE HOMESTEAD PARCEL DOES NOT RLAGH 16U ACktS, THE PARCEL LISTED AS 1-15 IS LESS THAN $179000 LMV THLN A PORTION OF THE 2-03 WILL BE TAKEN AT 16% TO BRI,4G THE TOTAL TO • $179000. THE BALANCE OF THE 2-03 WILL bE TAKEN AT 30%. AS MANY PARCELS AS ARE NEEDED TO REACH 160 ACHES MAY 6E COOED 2-039 HOwEVER ONCE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ACHES IN NAkCELS CUUEU • 1-15 b e-03 EQUALS OR EXCEEDS 160 ACRES+ NO HUUIT1UwAL PARCELS SHOULD BE CODEU 2-039 ANY PARCELS OF Or+E OwNEk RLMAINING AFTER 160 HAS BEEN RLACHEU SHOULD 6E COOEU 2-02. • 2-02 THIS IS LAND ADJO114ING THE HOMESTEAD PN,OPEkTY BUT IS OVER THE 160 ACRES WHICH IS ELIG16LE FOR TAX CkEDIT. THIS IS FIGURED AT 30%• (THIS CODE MAY ALSO HE USED TO FOkCE • USE OF SOME PARCELS FUR 16% & HOMESTEAU CKEUIT CONSIDERATION* SEE NOTES. 2-01 THIS CODE IS FOR PROPERTY LISTEU AS NON-HOMESTEAU HECAUSE • IT DOES NOT ADJOIN HUHLSTEADEO PROPERTY AND 15 FIbUkEU AT 30%. 1-11 AGRICULTURAL PARTNERSHIP OR EXTRA HOMEaTLAU ASSESSED AT 16% UP TO $17.000 OF LMV. THE EXCESS IS ASSESSED AT 3U%. THIS CODE IS USED WHERE AN OWNER RETAINS HIS HOMESTEAD AND BUYS ANOTHER HOMESTEADED PROPERTY Oil WHICH HE WILL PAY • THE TAX• THEN THE PROPERTY CAN BE. LINKED by MU# TO HIS UTHt►� +rA�, PROPERTIES WITH OUT AFFECTING THE ASSES:�EO VALUE CALCULATION OR HOMESTEAD CREDIT CALCULATION ON THE UTHER NROPLkTLLS. THERE • MIGHT ALSO 6E A TRANSFER OF RESIDENCE. SITE TO A NON—HOMESTEAD PROPERTY RESULTING IN A MID—YEAR HOMESTEAU EL161kilLITY ON THE NEW PROPERTY. UNDER THESE CONDITIONS TAE PROPERTY WOULD CHANGE CLASSIFICATION AFTER 1 YEAR. THIS CODE WOULD ALSO 6E USED TO IUENTIFY THE RESIDENCE 6 1 ACRE HOMESTEAD Of N MEMOLR OF A PARTNLRSHIP. THIS WILL • ALLOW ALL THE PRGPEkT1ES OF THE PARTNER`)HIP TO 8E LINKLD WITH AN MO#. THERE IS NO HOMESTEAU OR HG CREDIT CARRYOVLR* 1-21 WHERE THERE IS JOINT OWNERSHIP ANU ONE NAklY 15 DISAt$LED• • THE PROPERTY VALUE IS DIVIDED by 29 THEN THE ASSESSED VALUE IS COMPUTED ON ONE—HALF AT 5% UN TO $14+000 AND 30% ON THE EXCESS. THE OTHLk HALF IS ASSESSED AT 16% UP TO tb89500 • AND 30% ON THE tiALA'VCE. (ADJACENT PROPERTY CODED AS 2-03 AND LINKED WITH AN MON WILL ALSO BE ASStSSEU AT 5% UNTIL THE TOTAL LMV REACHES $289000.) • 2-22 ALL PROPERTY WHICH IS NOT OWNED BY A HOMESTEAD OWNER. ASSESSED VALUE I5 FIGURkD AT 30%. (USE 1S OFTIONAL—SAME AS 2-019) 1-14 NLIND CREDIT IS 5% OF THE FIRST $289000 OF LMV ANU THE BALANCE • AT 30%. (ADJACENT PROPERTY CODED AS 2-03 ANU LINKED WITH AN MO# WILL ALSO 8E ASSESSED AT 5% UNTIL THE TOTAL. LMV REACHES $289000.) • • • ---------------------------------------------------------------------�-� • +►+► COMMERCIAL +�+► 4-17 THIS IS A SPLIT CLASSIFICATION ASSESSMENT WHERE THE RESIUGNCE IS LISTED AS A CODE 3-16 PARCEL. BOTH KkE GIVEN A MULTIPLE OWNERSHIP NUMBER. IF THE PARCEL CODED J-16 UOES NOT REACH THE $179000 LMV9 THEN A PORTION OF THE 4-17 PROPERTY IS • ASSESSED AT 2Ui UP TO $179000. THE BALANCE OF THE LMV WILL THEN BE FIGUPEU AT 436. IF THE PARCEL LISTED AS 3-16 HAS LMV OF $17+000 OR OVER THEN ALL OF THE 4-17 VALUE IS FIGURED AT • 43%o WHEN FISCAL DISPARITY IS INVOLVED THE PROPERTY MUST bE SPLIT INTO 2 PARCELS+ OTHERWISE 2 VALUES MAY UE ASSIGNED TO ONE PARCEL- 3-17 THIS CODE MAY BE USED WHERE IT IS NOT DESIRED TO SPLIT THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY INTO A RESIUENTIAL AND A COMMERCIAL VALUE. THE PROPERTY IS ASSESSED AT 20% UP TO $179000 LMV. • THE BALANCE IS A55ESSEU AT 43%. 4-09 THIS IS NON-HOMESTEAD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY AND THE ENTIRE AMOUNT IS FIGURED AT 43%. • 4-10 INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY FIGURED AT 43%9 4-05 THE LAND AND STRUCTURES OF PUBLIC UTILITY PROPERTY FIGUREU AT 43% WITH THE ATTACHED MACHINERY AT 33 1/3%. (THE ATTACHED MACHINERY VALUE IS ENTERED INTO THE (;kEEN ACRES LAND VALUE FIELD. THIS IS FOR PROGRAMMING CONVENIENCE ANU DOES *NOT* INDICATE THE METHOD OF ASSESSMENT.) • • -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -.-.. 2-04 SEASONAL RECREATIONAL kESIOENTIAL PROPERTY FIGURED AT 30%* 4-04 SEASONAL RECREATIONAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FIGURLU AT 30t. • 4-27 SEASONAL RECREATIONAL COMMERCIAL — MA a PA RESORTS ASSESSEU AT 16% FOR 500 FT X boo FT b 8 CABINS. NO HOMESTEAD CREDIT — NO AG CREDIT • 4-28 SEASONAL RECREATIONAL COMMERCIAL - MA & PA RESORTS ASSESSEU AT 30x6. THIS IS THE EXCESS OF THE MA b PA RESORT UvER THE 500 By 800 FT. • 2-19 TIMbERLANU AT 20% AND GETTING 10 MILL AG. CREDIT. 4-12 THIS IS NON-HOMESTEAD VACANT LAND NOT (,LASSIFIEU AS RESIDENTIAL LGTS9 TIMBERLAND• AU LAND. IT IS ASSESSEU AT 4356. • • • • • • • i • Section 4 THE RATE SHEET PRESENTLY IN EFFECT AND • ITS CERTIFICATIONS • • • • • 3 CITY OF SHAKOPEE 1978 RATE SHEET • SO. FOOT BUILDING COST FACTORS [Basement Included] SO. FT. 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 15W 1600 1 1800 2000 2400 2800 3200 M27.15 W EXCELLENT 35.70 35.20 34.70 34.20 33.70 33.25 32.86 32.35 32.00 31 65 31 30 30.85 30.65 30.35 25.75 29.45 28.20 29.05 28.85 O l7 GOOD 34.20 33 70 33.20 32 70 32.20 31.75 31.30 30.6 30.50 30.15 29.80 29.45 29.15 28.65 28.25 27 95 27 70 27.55 27.35 FAIR 32.70 32.20 31 70 31.20 30.70 30 25 29.80 29.35 29 00 28.65 28.30 27.95 29.65 27.35 26.75 26.45 26.25 26.05 25 65 SPLIT FOYER - ENTRY MULTIPLIER = 1.065 [Converted Below] EXCELLENT 38.02 37 48 36 95 36.42 35.89 35.41 34.93 34.45 34.09 33.70 33.33 32.96 32.64 32.32 31.68 31.36 31.09 30.93 30.72 30.51 GOOD 36.42 35 89 35 35 34.82 34.29 33.81 33.33 32.85 32.48 32.1 1 31.13 31.36 31.04 30.72 30.08 29.76 29.S8 29.34 29.13 28.92 FAIR 34 82 34 29 33.76 33.22 32 69 32.21 31.73 31.2 5 30.88 30.51 30.13 28.76 31.57 29.12 26.48 26.17 27 95 27.74 27.53 27.31 • SPLIT LEVEL MULTIPLIER = 1.090 [Converted Below] EXCELLENT 38.91 38.36 37.82 37.27 136.73 36.24 35.75 35.26 34.68 34.48 30.84 33.73 33.40 32.87 32.42 32.10 31.83 31.66 31.44 31.22 GOOD 37.28 36.73 36.18 35.64 35.10 34.61 34.11 33.62 33.24 32.86 32.46 32.16 31.77 31.44 30.79 30.46 30.19 30.02 29.81 29.59 FAIR 35.64 35.09 34.55 34.08 33.46 32.91 32.48 31.99 31.61 31.22 30.84 30.46 30.13 29.81 29.15 28.63 28.61 26.39 28.17 27.95 BASE RATE MULTIPLIERS ROW HOUSE MODIFIER = .090 DEDUCTIONS 1 % STORY 115% 4.25 - BASEMENT • 1%a STORY 135% 2.00 PER SO. FT. 13/4 STORY 155% FOR BELOW AVERAGE DWELLING 2 STORY 165% ADDITIVES • GARAGES 6.75 EXTRA PLUMBING PER FIXTURE 325.00 LOWER LEVEL FINISH 4.00 • 9.00 WALKOUTS 700.00 CANTILEVER (OVER HANG SPLIT LEVEL) 16.00 SUNKEN LIVING ROOM + 200.00 G.A. STAIRWAY 325.00 SINGLE TUCK GARAGE 525.00 FINISHED AREA OVER GARAGE 22.00 DECKS A.00 DOUBLE TUCK GARAGE 1.025.00 HEATED GARAGES +125.00 BRICK 3.60 BASEMENT FINISH 2.50 - 4.00 EXTRA KITCHEN 900.00 FOYER AREA 26.00 EXTRA FURNACE 1500.00 A/C THE COST APPROACH TO VALUE • 1 STORY 950.00 SPLIT a B. LEVEL 1000.00 BASIC DEPRECIATION TABLE 2 STORY 1200.00 OBSERVED CONDITION/RATING OF DWELLING PATIO SLABS 1.15 ACTUAL VERY VERY AGE EXCEL. GOOD GOOD AVERAGE FAIR POOR POOR UNSOUND PORCHES 0-3 0 0-5% 5% 10% 15% - - • 3 - SEASON 12.00 • 18.00 4-8 0-5% 5-10% 10% 15% 20% 25% - - OPEN 3.50 9-13 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% - ENCLOSED (NO HEAT)6.50 14-18 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% - 19-23 15% 20% 28% 30% 35% 40% 50% - FIRE PLACE 24-28 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 50% 60% - SINGLE 900.00 29-38 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 55% 60-43% 70-80% • DOUBLE 1250.00 39.49 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55-60% 65-70% 75-85% FREE STANDING 300.00 50 & OVER -s '• 40% 50% 3.?% 60-65% '0-75% 80-90% • • • July 26th91977 City of Shakopee LeRoy Houser Shakopee, Minnesota • Dear LeRoy, The cost sheet of housing in the City of Shakopee for the year of 1977 that you sent to me is very accurate according to my estimation. ppectively, ±� c Ro er Lambrecht Lambrecht Construction Shakopee, Minnesota • 'i ,t • i • • Cletus J. Link Realty Co. 1400 West 3rd Ave. SHAKOPEE,MINN.55379 Feb 279 1978 Phone: 445-2093 HOMES-BUSINESS-FARMS Mr. and tars. iiousers I have reviewed your 1978 oost ache Jule and have found it to be reasonably accurate at the time of rewiews August 19 1977- As you know, biding costa have been on the increase at the rate of one percent per month. It is difficult Efor us to keep abreast of current costa and will only warrant a bid for 3U days. Cletus Link Construction Co- a e erhardt Realtors %7 Mortgage Bankers Property Managers 1 October 6, 1977 Mr. LeRoy Hauser City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Mr. Hauser: It is the opinion of this office and agents that the cost sheet of housing in the City of Shakopee for the year 1977 is accurate. Co dial Vernelle Clayton Sales Manager I EBERHARDT COMPANY . . . the real estate people . . . since 1935 a( VC/lb f �I f 11 �.. ... eberhardt company shakopee of Ice 104 south Culler • shakopee, mmnesota 55379 • phone (612) 445 6400 ron Lr� Nu lyv aw +t • • • • Section S THE LAND VALUE CHART AND MAP • • • • • • • 1. LAND VALUE CHART Residential Lots • 65 ' to 90 ' ff $10, 000 over 90 ' ff $11,000 Under 65 ' ff $ 9,000 • 50 'x142 ' (7, 100 sq. ft. ) $ 8,000 6() 'x 71 ' (4, 260: sq. ft. ) $ 7, 500 s � • Ag Value 1 - 2 . 5 acres $ 7, 500 a 2 . 5 - 5 acres . $10, 000 14 Vf 7� Site Value in Platted Additions $10,000 J.� • Y- i 1 9) '1 1 i nt4 14 � rf ;4Y 1t } I 4y- k � 3 AGRh f JMIMPR tD 5 GORMAN r 9 N W P —ft A ' MRN _ -LD Hi I Lad ,A- � P r T iI OF SN 40N -OL Z I 5 � � 13` 2 �1� 1 •iiYi••• i•..�i'I� I I j ..� `I• 1• �l' J 4AVE, ` _ I ,}1 t - N �.�\S Si.MIOH NIOM - ( 1 I ' 1 • } •'� } t I JUNI(Nt M16N i I I I I i � I i I N • I .wlsloN CITY OF SHAKOPE N I "-T- � Auc U +oo eoo Izoo o.OwM Or J _�k o0t1 MAN CNCNFO\r ScAto --T- SCALE. E IN FEET l { o j 1 APMOVIO Or +;NAPM • 1 �9 w� sr t DRAWING NO of I� I Ail E • Ord _ • r",` AYf. i -• \ r - a T _ v �.� 61 --lia eu VG 1 PANK .,A.", F 1. • � / -� r C STATE fANY _".� 8A - - _� •i Z •1 ��—� J � • , I 1 .. L _ I -J _AVE _ .." y i i` _-_-_ - 1 11 7 . , r{ Ir / _. cuwwao+I cE vcKoa r 4 MAPK9 i -�` Cw CITY -1- PMN I LIONS PAAK --•_- • I I � I CITY PARK _ f • • • Section 6 • VERIFIED SALES FROM 1977 THAT WERE SUPPORTIVE OF 19781S REASSESSMENT • • • • • prior to�onVinD MINNESOTA DEP�EN.T OF REVENUE Itrer of paedr. �. Address d Purchaser j a Pr,r�h.e.r D VILd IN Nolad , tiaa. "3" n, of Ilexes ❑Tow �P 6. Cwtrrlr R.R $freer or .) City son d ROpartY Transferred (NumberM i NA wowKtAb y�r.t d carwarewee=l t ton fore a attach 2 cgpie d/eye/dese►ipion bent ins! 1i . � tpperipion /Fill/n leya/descript' j 4 �T t dLOCK'NO. 1 I Month 11 year 1Vto an whi q' se purcha egreerrrerrt was made. r 309000+00 Ptrchl Prioi (including mWtgaga and specisf assesenlantsl• s amount of rrron~wouned' hinsry. sops. etcl- 0 J' cltsse Price (furniture. apPlisnws not built in,mac MOO 1 vtilus d personal Property included in ptr Deed Stamp paymenas Icornputed on Item s less Items 10 and 111• s ❑Plew Orlilding ❑Buildi Rsvi:,- Used Residential OF PROPERTY: lard Only ❑Corytrercial []Irduotr-a OPAL INTENDED USE: ❑Agvicultrral qhN (explain) chssed was Seas./Rec• Catrnercial ❑sees./Rec.PAS Odell ❑YES ❑NO The ournber of acres pu► rt used to expend present Ixrmirrg un�t7 ❑ NO aOrrculhral, was Property the property: purchased from• relstrw. a Q�ft. an excha . a forced or auction sale�fY ❑Y� �� . "Ur opinion, was the sale or transfer mode attarr market valued ❑YESy ❑r '*NO". briefly explain why. Iemonte64apaI descriptranl has been examined by me(ur1 acrd to tfre best OlKisce under penalty 43# law. that tnis certrfrcate Irncl �np suPP AurI knowledge and belief it is true. correct and complet l Date .�,r►lPr-r . Sa 2. Sig" too has er or, /�!ti,�G • � .r Rath � face item"" o1 conwYanoo • pocurrNnt No. V 111c1e14 LAW cot f�lln► = �^ T Q Lowe t�-,^� YI Plat•Paroa TOt ACIM '•f • �� Did aid ore 0'7"1' sr �JpD... Le-VV DD ♦ 10.1a3•�I Q Total ��"� Total T j2x,x01 �. , 11•'I!1•>1�) .;,.. Total 4.1x 11) 6.Ile-lyl •.Il��l•. �' 1.111 Z,Q.A 3.11-71 �,�.■ .E , rk M� vrwl A�,or ua rw w.y�n,I `�, w6cvAE507A DEPAfIli�iil HT• CIF REVENtr'IE • p�Ffy+rrer of Dwrak. spa Of Ptxchas Tom. � 2, Address Of r Purchase , 106 E. 6th Ave- u.r 1(4 So. 5979 �. y�y� • hero. • [3 Township 6. County �gtion d frroperty Transfgrad (NunrbW fi Street a R.R.) 5. City of, . 1 pascripti /fill iw /eye esc�iprisn below a attach tepiea aI Jsya/ascription haw rwstrtrrreM d caweyencai • .�•.,• . af• Mp X P►ni.NA1� •� r Month 12 Year -=_= feijMpn which purchase agreerrtartt was nrsde. %WjA urchsea pride (including mWtgM0- and spacial aseesew onial. foul amatnt of wwnpape assunrd• a included in purchase price (furniture. applienoea not built in.mschinery. Crops. etc/. • N value d personal property MV0 •Deed Stamp peymanis (computed on Rent 8 less Items 10 and 111. • New Building ❑Building Previously used 4 OF PROPERTY: Land Only D UCarrrtsrcial 13 industrial Residential IPAL INTENDED USE: ❑Agricultural /Rec. Canntercial ❑ Sells.Alec.Res identISI 001her Iexplainl rt used to expand Present farming unity OYES ❑NO The nurrnber of saes purchased was if ser ultural.was property NO 61 property: purchased from a relative, a gift. an exchange. a forced or auction sales ❑YES m in Your inion, was the sale Or transfer made at Tarr market value? OYES ❑NO NO VMS ' M'•NO' . ',of 1j explain why. + (declare urde.penblty d Iaw, that this certificate /including supplemental legs1 discruption)fool been examined by me (�) and to the best four knowledge and belief it is true. correct and complete. Date Srgnat e of purchases. Sal or Agent /.7- /•3' 7 • Ratio Val. �M OaM RaCO►NO M KI of Conve r 44 AL Indr 't - T 1 Acne pm a roer No "vu INLY Total �•i>A'� Total Total 7j22 8.162-20) Y.p>G•>)e) ` 1-(11 24141) N•71 L pelf/ 6.ifs-1�) �.(lthll) ••.•�.. • • •'' a�. r mm �p,,;e,ror�oigl+rrs rr1YNESOTA DEPARTMENT Of ittrVENUE by lfryisINV of D+sdIR 2. Ad of �Pimehsst!less o1 Puchasat,r B. find ith H. t�oor►�IC► Off --• C01640 69 x1mi:eota Irwnest 9uluwra, fi partnarfihi a, county stn Af Property Transferred (Number 6 Street or R.R.) 6. City ❑Township r Shakopee $Gott t! Ywt 126 Avas>Dlsa, Of �. a �ription —#H in legal dsscription De/ow fir atrach copies d legal descrigion Iran instrument M conveyance.) 3 BLOCK NO. PLAT NAW V w t 1 r r F Month Vsauat __ Year ----' e din which purchase agreement was made. htel'our+Chaq pia linctudino mortgage and special assessments). •—= -•� deal amount of mortgage assumed. s Ojai value of personal property included rn purchase price (funiturs, appliances not built in,machinery, crops. etc)•• Mete Deed Stamp payments (computed on Item 9 less Items 10 and 11 1. 1O__20 New Buildino 0 Buil Previously Used" #KIND OF PROPERTY: ❑Land Only ❑Commercial O Industrial Residential PRINCIPAL INTENDED USE: ❑ AVricullural Seas./Rec.Resident ial ❑Ottnsr lexplainl Seas./Prat. Corrxner�ial Q ' fl agrecultiral, was property used to expanrt¢esent farming unit? OYES ONO Then of acres purchased was Was the properly. ptuchased front a reliliva, a gift. an exctwogs. n forced or auction sale? OYES D ` In your opinion. was the sale or transfer pride at lair mar Mat valued (:J YES ❑NO 11 "NO". briefly explain why. 0>r1 deciara urxter penall�M law, that this cerlrf rcata lincluding supplemental legal description) has been examined by me(ur:1 arid to the be DWELLING year.built��1�- --- story height r'';, no. rooms -� no. baths - no. bedrooms basement percent -- r? basement fin. - 01,• heat + electrical built ins " "'" ,• 1 rooms carpeted Lot sire tr..�� X GARAGE X attached yes no {� single wall double wall wired yes — no j•` OBSERVED CONDITION: Exc. t� 0 2° Good ESTIMATED MARKET VALUES-iy Fair SOLD FOR: r Poor DATE SOLD a r. J I. r% , L %,,, 1. -#AL. tJt/•11 L VALUIG prstedpr,pr torecurd.ny MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE S by Arosrer of Deods of Purchaser 2. Address of Purchaser Of Se 1 I er ion of Properly Translerred (Number b Street or A.R.1 5. ❑ City Township 6. County i Of G , I Dersctiptson (F pit on legal descr.pfnon below or attach 2 copies of legal descn/Mnon from instrument of conveyance.) NO. BLOCK NO. PLAT NAIIE `.r-Ct rF 13n' in Leif.' ,»r t,f VIA , •� at C ,.}i^r Its �r. •'IS' i^ 11r "-rt". �r`ttrt\'r ir,l?t"(►'.21. I'^nCri! ar� 11011C.':: � '►'1n1!ir- at B point on t1`^ CEntfrlire of r.� •,•n• rt,-r ♦Tn, n . r ♦t n f n t - ' - c. .ttl• nr al(' i. .. t._. font n�rt � {' ,_ t_ irtrrs c ..i r. o s i:. eenterlir arcs t'.^ . a. _ • li.., Cr cF _ •'t'� t' r+IZCr r^rt'• -i Ce[ fie:; t '^^GP n s t .91'1 ' f rJ1121 lire 0 r,irt rn c� o 4' t+,_,, a s,)tjt', an..' parallel t^h s::i.' c^rter- ; of ZY." feet to t`'f rpirt cf I , irrt.r '• _ �ile an which purchase agreement was rrrsde. Month 'jL^li:t year 1 `�? -- 101 purchase price lincludrrtg mortgage and special assessmental. ,r Itat amount of mortgage assumed. tat value of personal properly included to purchase price flurniture. appliances not bush in. machinery. Crops. etcl. s /' ,(r r" Me Deed Stamp psyments (computed on Item 9 less Items 10 and 111. ^^ r - _ I C OF PROPERTY: ❑Land Only ❑Nei► Building Q Building Revrously Used NCIPAL INTENDED USE: ❑ ApicuIfisa1 0 Comma#c$a1 ❑Industrial ®Residential St a, 'Rue. Cummerctal ❑Seas. 'Rec.Residential ❑Outer lexplatnl .ti-a"ctoikital, was property used to expand rwesent farming unit) ONES ONO The numttrr of acres purchased was �b thr /rnix,rty Iuchased from a relative. a gilt. an exchange, r found or nucttm salr' OYES tf]NO 1 [ yout optn.nn. was the sale of transfer made al fair market valuer OYES ❑NO •' •'NO" tx set IV explain why. ' n I I,Irr Under tenallV ill law, that heel (eft.l.catt' i,ncludtng supplemental legal descrrlrt.ttn% hJS lm.en endn.,•.t•d UV rite ttral and to the tx`$t I DWELLING year built X sq. ft. story height _ f no. rooms no, baths / I no. bedrooms basement percent _ Z_ 1•-� -- basement fin. heatiYP� ��/ n/n • electricalX built ins rooms carpeted .�, p'" '"�^►`., „r, �. ' : t Lot size X_ .-�f •ru..,a,r,' GARAGE _X a attached yes_,,�no OWN= ` single wall double wall i wired yes no 4i OBSERVED CONDITION: Exc, ` Good ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE Fair SOLD FOR: cjQ� Poor DATE SOLD I E� 18445 "� ?° ►". • . b,�',► CERTIFICATE OF REAL ESTATE VALUE ( ��(� �bv moprio.at Dov%, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE rr ey Reers(e,o/ONdIr. of Pwc Earl A. Hofimaster and Susan F. 2. Address of Purchaser haser s.l l life 1 4589 Oolorado Street S.E. ' r w1awetnce Link and Marlene Link, Prior Lake, Mn. 55372 .+ at�ion d Aupurty Transletred (Number t1 Stteet or R.R.) 6. (City ❑Township 6. County �8 Delknta street of Shati sie Scott sl Descr►pron /fill ,n Iepal descrsprnon below a attach 2 copses of legal description limn instrument of conveyance.) j. NO. BLOCK NO. PLAT NAME f i Ivt "wee (3) , Block 7W (2) , Eagle Bluff 2nd Addition, according to the plat !� thereof on file and of record in the office of the of ftdw t, in and • for Scott 03mty, Minnesota. Deeds . Subject to restrictions, reserve and easements of record, if any -f on which sW -7 - } � purchase Bement was made. h Year t Ixxchase price (including mortgage and special assessmeMSl. 49.000_QQ t amount of mortgage assumed. ` -value ol personal pupetty mcluwk-41 in Wachase Ixrce llurnrture. appliances mx built in. machinery, crops, etcl. ` 3,Q00,00 _ Deed Staml, payments (compulud on Item 9 loss Items 10 and 111. It 1 Ol _nn -- Of PROP[RtY: Lwnd Only (:)New Building []Building Aeviously Used CIPAL INTENULD USE: ❑ Adt,culltsrl ❑CUMMINClel u1ndustrial ❑Resident iaI as. 'Rvk: Cutm.ercrn+l ❑Sues. Nuc.Rosrikrntral ❑alter (explain) I: DWELLING year built—�-�-�- story height ---•�n -- no. rooms _ --- no. baths — . no. bedrooms —j — basement percent •----- r basement fin. heat electrical —_.--_._ r .i ..1 _ built ins — ►►-y` rooms carpeted Lot size aQ---X GARAGE .2�X attached yes no_ ~�� _ •�� 4.. • single wall _ double wall wired yes ------no ( d85ERVED CONDITION: Exc. — f Good lt'14 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE • Fair SOLD FOR: L------ �� Poor DATE SOLD V- ---- ,9 CERTIFICATE OF REAL. ESTATE VALUE t iiredp►ror to recording MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE i r by Rel.sler of Deeds. of Purchaser WilliaM D. Laeina and Z• Address of Purchaser A_ LaC na. UDh nd and wife LINK BROS. , INC. Shakopee , MN 55379 r ♦�tron of Property Transferred INumber & Streat or R.R.) 5. K) City ❑Township 6. County 3 East Shakopee Avenue pf Shakopee Scott I Description (fill in legal desorption below or attach 2 copies of legal description from instrument of conveyance.) i 5 PLAT NAMEJ.E.J. Addition q y NO. 7 BLOCK NO. it -k) .�f Month April Year 1977 on which purchase agreement was made. ' $ 51,70 0. 0 0 I txxchase p ice (including mortgage and special assessrrtentsl. I amount of mortgage assumed. $ I value of personal property inchxied in purchase price (ftxniture. appliances not built an. machinery, crops, e1c). S 1,700. 00 ;' e Deed Stamp payments (cumputtld on Item 9 less Items 10 and 11). S 110. 00 ! OF PROPERTY: ❑ Land Only ( NeN Building ❑Building Previously Used j -"" — Industnat $) Residential CIPAL INTENDED USE:' ❑ Agricultural ❑Cum^'s'e'al ❑ as 'Rec Commercial ❑ Seas..'Rec.Residential ❑Other (explain) r.cultraal, was property used to expand present farming unity ❑YES ONO The number of acres purchased was 1' . e property: purchased from a relative. a grit. an exchange, a lcx a ced auction sales OYES ENO NO i your opinion. was the sale or transfer made at fair market value? ❑YES ❑NO F •'•NO•'. brief ly explain why. _ NO opinion i clare under penalty nl 14,Ar that tthry certificate lincluding supplerrienl 1 legal °, acrrptiurn) has been examined Loy me (us) and to the best ur) knowledge and belief it i5 true. uxrect and complete. Date 4 Sngnatwc of Pw/chaser Ag+nt _ iJ rd DWELLING year built,__ Zir-_—X-4?-_sq. It._jff1 79_---- i story height at,h no. room$ no. baths 044♦ Z 0 l no. bedrooms _ moo �. basement percent basement fin. heat electricalQQ. ,� r s built ins rooms carpeted Let size A/,_—X �� ^! /1✓-i - ""' ' r i GARAGE _j?._—X 24 attached yes_ v no_ single wall _ _ double wail - _ s f 51 y CERTIFICATE OF REAL ESTATE VALUE �{ in �rp/rre pries to pri to record p MINNESOTA,DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 'a s •r by f9apister of Deeds. ,e of PUrct►aser 2. Address of Purchaser ' w8we W. /Milt 110! Nwns St. no of Sellers «tion of Property ransferred (Number 6 Street or R.R.) 5. 10 City ❑Township County �rt i 1109 1� rat• °f Saloom a 1 Description (fill in legal description below Of attach 2 copies of loyal description from instrument of conveyance./ AMMLM NO. V (20 BLOCK NO.Aft i6� PLAT NA 4@ r '! 0 Month d Year L� e an which putctWSe agreement was made- so mschase price (including mortgage and special assessments). :2"a00 A amount of mortgage assumed- 11 value of personal property included in purchase.,price (furniture, appliances not built in, machinery, crops, etc►. s 3 000.00 #. �e Deed Stamp payments (computed on Item 9 less Items 10 and 11). s •yVr I. !) OF PROPERTY: ❑ Land Only_ ❑New Building ❑Building Previously Used � ❑Commercial NCIPAL INTENDED USE. ❑ Agricultural [j industrial Residential leas.,'Rec. Commercial ❑ Seas./Rec.Resident raI ❑Other eexplain) grrculhrral, was property used to expand present farming unit/ ❑YES Z]NO The number of acres purchased was r the property: purchased from a relative. a gift, an exchange, a forced or auction sale? ❑YES NO y your opinion,. was the sale or transfer made at fair market value) OYES 0 N 'NO" briefly explain why. Net fkd eclare under penalty of law. that this certificate linclud+ng supplemental legal description) has be 6n examined Dy me lust and to the best • DWELLING year built__—!-L- -- f story a `•he(ghI no. rooms �1' ► r. no. baths 40 w' I no, bedrooms r basement percent — `J J I basement fin. heat -- ` 4 electrical } r:f, built ins i • rooms carpeted Lot size _4o X GARAGE _�0X ��.� --•• attached yes no single wall double wall t , wired yes no +. • OBSERVED CONDITION: 6 0 ys/ Exc. ✓ ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE Good SOLD FOR: fair Poor DATE SOLD • • Section 7 DEPRECIATION EXPLAINED AND • OUR PRESENTLY IN USE DEPRECIATION TABLE • • • • • k DEPRECIATIONI a' y y Depreciation is loss in value to the property from all causes; physical, functional and economic. • V It is the difference between replacement cost new of a property and the sale price of a property. For example, should it cost $50,000 to build a 1 , 000 sq. ft. rambler, with a 400 sq. ft. attached garage • on a 85 x 142 ' lot new today, and a 10 year old house identical in all respects sold today for $45,000, depreciation would be as follows: $50,000 t $45,000 = 10% Depreciation or 1% per year We have tried to build our Depreciation Tables from market information. To our knowledge we have considered all factors in arriving at our tables. • • DEPRECIATION TABLE • Year Built Percentage 1978 0 1977 0 1976 0 1975 3 1974 4 1973 4 1972 5 1971 6 • 1970 7 1969 7 1968 8 1967 9 1966 10 1965 10 1964 11 1963 12 1962 13 1961 14 1960 15 1959 16 1958 17 1957 17 1956 18 1955 18 1954 19 1953 19 1952 20 1951 20 1950 21-22 1949 22-25 1948 22-25 1947 25-26 1946 26-27 1945 27 1944 27-29 1943 27-29 1942 29-30 1941 29-30 1940 30 Older homes depreciated strictly on observed conditiOg and direct sales. • • • ', • Section 8 AN EXAMPLE OF APPRECIATION • • • • • • ��, CERT,�!CA OF PEAL. EiT VAWIE pr+ j,r;r!ct.^ �i MINNESOTA IE�ARTMENT�0G-REVENUE �• �� .� r da recorr,ny ,. y ' Repster of,Deeds t8me of Purchaser v. 2, Addy s Of Purchaser. " 119 -South Lev3.n Street i ,e y r;ti � t�g.__n; A. Brawn Shakopee, Hai . 55379 'A. c fame of Seller ,. .• , L,., �� .�• Cit ❑Township 6. CQurty ocat t�t Roperty Transferred (Number d Street or R R 5.r 3 Shakopee 26 &Dulth Fuller Street " � � ' ` of aWa. egol ascription (fill in legal description below,a► it taro-. copies a hergal de ript.on from!ns�tr�u^,enfA�oltForrv4�sno �'� �tdrll OT rV V. _ .� '�4 , . r• �I BLOCK Q. 'N_Rt'1 4[1 'IT'�li' '�i. �• �ir"`y the, Nor IR; ' The North^ one halt (mss). of. 5 4 Hloc]c Eighty Three • of the East Ton 10) feet of ?A� Fonr .,( r tat of Scott County, [inaesv ° according( to . i?, City of Shakopee, t iieoord the office o! the Fegfste� ` t Shakopee City on file and. o of Deeds` of Scott County. Kianesota: Vic, '^nf,,� �. .t� ' .. .��. y�''7t7M'ry•��MT.I��f�y'd-� �, � •r :1�5:�6.�:. :� �lYT 1"' i,'.y ,�1i.. y Sr Month 1977 0at8ron(which purchase agreement was rtrade • '".ti'"- i r r . . �. n A'yT37 000.0 ots purchase price (including mortgage and special assessmentdl• � $eveII vho11>< q ' f�13f.a�m�YO1-��UflOafa@.-8ti5 �` � � r''� _ '• "4 11,�i �•d .� DWELLING year built_�7g _ x sq. ft. 9 , story height no. rooms no. baths no. bedrooms basement percent basement tin. heat Fo cE.� g�- -^ r •� I tri electrical 1 • built ins rooms carpeted r1 -_ n - .. Lot size .__-1Q X _ t — —� GARAGE ZD X —1�-- ' RE attached yes no A y single wall double wall wired yes no OBSERVED CONDITION: — --- E Good Goo -- - � __ ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE —LL--� - Fair _---- SOLD FOR: Poor _ DATE SOLD promp/gt*dakw"o wo-ralirep A MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF RJVENUE "• �r.�, palW OY Rapstw 01 I Nest d �urtP.hsuw { 2. Address of Purchaser _. , bwlnu� v. !liner , ,, '�{ L�E._ xt tiro'r ` ' ` °s ftma� r 5537Y. -t�Tf,'Jt't• , f Local Propert ,Transferred )Number aL Street or R.R 5. M city---. ❑Town1ship 6. .k„:yc� t ";yii s. a ! *=fit � F*rljir'�' of OOt1R ii�� try i • ,, ,.. Lagal riptltxt �fil!in ley+l description below a attach co $as d lope/dq rrprion Iran insrrumen! of cjonv`f trace r eta - J } 9 �t ,r:,�. .,N.h�!i►rt. � i' X. /. ":taG ' 7^I ~ � WT N '' K."r P r t �., i Y ` BLOCK NO '1 ��. ,;•t.x PLAT NAW r 1116�,��''qw..� (ii�) of U i� a and tli* 0M ha u (I at" : Imps Ten Wpb o, Lot ro it.�la�� Block im&ty three (63), at sh*opeep 300th COM4a X1 "`"seplaading to tLr plat at Shalcopse C3t,7,CM Me of recoorl! the ott'iesa! of • hd^b .,�:�� t '.�! a:4 r,9-'� 1�f �.yt. . � �.�Y�.''','•�` �r ., ,r r! ��.T r a '�f�� I* y� ,�f� y� { }, ,r�ti� .; l�y.,.� �.�".�'d� '� �A'rl t!, r* .j'w. L•��.it��'* fr:t 1 � r ,Y' . :, ,! t��'� �1f.�*� rt�l.:,. � �! �} ♦n'�• Ti Ninzo 1 ru►7 1 ""%`^RV� �. `� .ear ,y DNS on which lxrehaso mve" sttt was msdi ?'r My �t+; e r f� 1' 1 Month- , ,-ya t Toni) Nurchafe pried encludiip mortgage errs)specitIMssseSi meretsl rY ;p ., {�, �fti+ ,^y' � •: 0000 aZ ;.+. .•6: �1°�". { ;;��..��rryr�ry�l 1 ( � � ..'a � ' {' ' '�ti� t+. {, '•�•r,, � Total amours{of mortgage aistxrtad�!�7i1JIF! ,. „ .1:a<.A. r� ,.3 . �"g"h'; "''"i � ttt�fs •l ,. _. ,." �I�,IrW w irt'N,�v'f' IS: .,• .. ., fkk t.F °„'�.��+''! 1�� t .Total valued personal property included �n purr=hale Race jfvniture, appliances not built in,machi ieiy.,Flops,etC1• r. State Deed Stamp payments 4computsrl an Item 9'”)tams TO and 111. KIND OF PROPERTY: k k O Land Only a!: ONew Building AD Building Reviously Us ed PRINCIPAL INTENDED USE: O Agricultural ❑Commercial 0 Industrial '�Resident Q Sees./Rec. CorrumerCial ❑Seas./Roc.Resident ial !�` O Other (explain) If agricultural• was property used to expand present farming unit? OYES ONO The number of saes purchased was ' Was the property: purchised from a relative, a gift. an exchange. a forced or auction sale? ❑YES 0 NO 1 . In y opinion, was the sale or transfer made at fast market value? OYES ONO ' Ii f 0••, briefly explain why. !, NO OPMON 1 declare under penalty of low. that this cerlitrcate lincludinp supplemental legal description) has been examined by me lus)and to the be "w lour)Unowtedge and beltel it it true, correct and complete- gnat 11GN Siure pl chaser. Seller or Agent Date + �. MERE DWELLING year built X alto 1111. 9 Q•O-- story height no. rooms no. baths ----- no. bedrooms r 4 basement percent btisement fin. • , N i heal •FQttcEn CrQC.. r-�--° electrical j built ins rooms carpeted Lot site "10—X ,�,�.�.-'�.^".a wrcl.►+, l GARAGE -,aQ—X ,2'�� y— attached yes no single wall Nom✓ �� double wall rg "f wired yes --no OBSERVED CONDITION: ' Exc. Try • • • • Section 9 • SUMMARY OF PROPERTY TAX LAW CHANGES MADE IN THE 1978 LEGISLATIVE SESSION • • a • • a: • • SUMMARY OF PROPERTY TAX LU CHANCES MADE Ili THE 1973 LEGISLATIVE SESSIO14 • CHAPTER 476 PERMITS COUNTIES , CITgATIONAND TO BUILD OR BU BORROW TOWNEHALLSr1 THE FARMERS HOME ADMINIST • Chapter 476 permits a county, city or town to borrow up to $100 , 000 froin the Farmers Home Administratioonein order to build or buy a town hall. Thbackamount the loan from the Farmers county or city levies to pay Home Administration is to be considered a special levy. This act was signed into law by the Governor on March 9 , 1978 and was effective as of that date. CHAPTER 518 SETS A TIME LIMIT FOR CITIES AND BEENTPASSEDOTONMAKE • INTO A CONTRACT AFTER A RES OLUTION LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS Chapter 518 requires a county, city or town to enter into a contract for local improvements no later than one y ear after b improve- tile date a resolution has been passed ordering P • ment to be made. However, if a date for entering into a is set in the contract to have the local imprapply.ts The isact was signed resolution, this rule does not apply. into law on b:arch 23 , 1978 and was effective as of August 1, 1978. • CIiAPTER 522 LETS COUNTIES, CITIES AND TOWNS LEVY PROPERTY TAXES TO PAY FOR THE COSTS OF LONG-TERM SIIELTERED WORKSHOPS OR WORK ACTIVITY PROGRAMS • cities and towns to levy pro- perty taxes to pay for the costs of long- workshops or work activity programs. Under this act, the not total levy of a city of the first claos a s ulation ofthecity. to be more than ten cents times the of pa town is not to be The total levy of any other city or 3 pore than 30 cents times its population. There is no limit on how much a county can levy per person to pay for the costs of long-term sheltered workshops or work activity • programs. However, this levy is not to be considered a special type of levy. Rather, the levy is to be made inside the general levy limits placed on both counties and cities. Counties, cities and towns had been permitted, by law, to levy property taxes to pay for the costs of long-term • sheltered workshops or work activity programs. But, that law was repealed in the 1976 Legislative Session. This act is designed to restore the levy and the limits to the levy that had been contained in the law before its repeal in 1976. This act was signed into law by the Governor on March • 23, 1978 and was effective as of August 1 , 1978. CHAPTER 543 EXEMPTS THE CITY OF NEW PRAGUE FROM THE DEFINITION OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA • Chapter 543 excludes the City of New Prague from the defini- tion of the metropolitan area under the fiscal disparities law. Also, the act excludes the City of New Prague from the metropolitan transit area and from the metropolitan area under the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Council. This • act was signed into law by the Governor on March 23, 1978 and was effective as of August 1, 1978 . CHAPTER 567 LIMITS THE REQUIREMENT FOR FILING A CERTIFICATE OF REAL ! ESTATE VALUE OIJ CONTRACT FOR DEED SALES TO THOSE PROPERTIES SOLD ON A CONTRACT FOR DEED ENTERED INTO ON JANUARY 1 , 1978 OR LATER AND ELIMINATES THE REQUIREMENT FOR FILING A CERTI- FICATE WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF SALE Chapter 567 eliminates the requirement that a certificate of ! real estate value be filed for each parcel of real estate sold on a contract for deed before January 1, 1978. Under this act, a certficate of real estate value must be filed for any parcel of real estate selling for more than $1 , 000 on January 1 , 1978 or later. The requirement that a certi- ficate of real estate value be filed within 30 days after ! the date of sale was eliminated. However, a deed for the transfer of property cannot be recorded in the office of the county recorder until a certificate' of real estate value has been first filed in the office of the county auditor. And, if a certificate of real estate value is not filed for a parcel of real estate sold on January 1, 1978 or later, that • parcel is not to be entitled to receive the state paid homestead credit, the taconite tax relief credit, and the state paid agricultural aid credit. This act was signed into law by the Governor on March 23, 1978 and was effective for property sold on January 1, 1978 and later. • 2 D CHAPTER 620 CALLS FOR A FIVE-YEAR DELAYED ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPROVEMENTS y MADE DURING THE REHABILITATION OF CERTAIN RENTAL PROPERTY Chapter 620 calls for a five-year delayed assessment of any value increase that results from the rehabilitation of a building having three or more rental units. Under this act, the owner of a building must apply to the assessor for the delayed assessment before beginning the rehabilitation of ` the building. The assessor is required to approve the application if the expected cost of rehabilitation is more than 60 percent of the total assessor ' s estimated market value of the property. Also, the building must: (1) be more than 25 years old; (2) not be used as a hotel or motel in which the rental units are used by tenants for rental periods of less than 30 days; (3) not be classified for property tax purposes as Title II or Minnesota Housing Finance Agency property; and (4) not have more than 25 percent of the residential units in the building subsidized through Section 8 of the U. S. Housing Act of 1937 . In • addition, the rehabilitation of the building must be fin- ished within one year from the start of construction and before the January 2nd assessment date. The assessor is permited to increase the value of the build- ing for improvements not covered under the application and to raise the value of the building to keep pace with the general valuation increases of similar buildings in the local area. The assessor is required to keep records on the number of buildings and the location of those buildings that qualify for the delayed assessment under this Act. Also, the assessor is to keep a record of the amount of value added to the building as a result of the rehabilitation project. This information is to be used by cities , towns or counties to evaluate the impact of the law change on their property tax base and mill rate. This act was signed into law by the Governor on March 28 , 1978 and was effective for taxes levied in 1978 and later, payable in 1979 and later. This law is scheduled to expire for taxes levied in 1983 , payable in 1984 . CHAPTER 634 ELIMINATES THE REQUIREMENT THAT ELECTORS OF A TOWN MUST VOTE ON PROPOSALS TO IMPROVE TOWN ROADS BEFORE THE IMPROVEMENTS CAN BE MADE Chapter 634 removes the requirement that proposals for improving town roads be put to a vote of a town ' s electors if all the owners of land affected by the proposed improve- ments petition to have the work done. This act was signed into law by the Governor on March 28 , 1978 and was effective on the next day. • 3 CHAPTER 658 • CHANGES THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE MONIES COLLECTED FROM THE TAX ON ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION LINES Chapter 658 changes the method for distributing the monies collected through the tax on high voltage electric trans- mission and distribution lines. Under this act, 35 percent • of the tax is to be distributed to the general revenue fund of the county, 50 percent to the general school fund of the county, and 15 percent to the towns inside the county where the high voltage transmission and distribution lines are located. In determining the amount of money going to a town, the length of the high voltage transmission lines • running across the town is to be divided by the total length of the lines in the county. The result, then is to be multiplied by the amount of transmission and distribution line tax set aside for towns located in the county. However, if the amount of tax to be distributed to a town is more than ten percent of its levy for the year before, the amount • over ten percent is to be paid to the county. Before the law change, 50 percent of the monies collected from the tax was credited to the general revenue fund of the county and 50 percent was credited to the general school fund of the county. This act was signed into law on March 28 , 1978 and is effec- tive for taxes levied in 1978 , payable in 1979 , and later years. CHAPTER 659 • PERMITS COUNTIES TO MAKE A LEVY FOR COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETIES IN ORDER TO HELP THEM PAY FOR THE COSTS OF LIA- BILITY INSURANCE PREMIUMS OR TORT JUDGMENTS Chapter 659 lets counties levy a tax for county agricultural • societies in order to help them pay for the expenses of liability insurance premiums or tort judgments. This levy is to be in addition to any levy limitation placed on counties. This act was signed into law on March 28 , 1978 and was effective as of August 1, 1978. • CHAPTER 672 CALLS FOR THE TRANSFER OF CERTAIN CASES PENDING IN DISTRICT COURT TO THE 'TAX COURT, ESTABLISHES VENUE FOR CERTAIN TAX COURT CASES AND BOTH CHANGES AND MAKES CLEAR THE FILING RE- QUIREMENTS FOR THE TAX COURT _ Chapter 672 permits any case pending in the district court on July 1, 1977 to be transferred to the tax court if the • 4 case involved the state ' s tax laws. Also, this act calls for all tax court cases involving an appeal from an order of the Commissioner of Revenue dealing with property taxes to be heard in the judicial district where the property is located. This act permits a person to file a petition in tax court as soon as he receives notice of a "final determination" of any matter concerning the state ' s tax laws. "Final determination" is defined to include a notice of assessment and equalization received from the assessor, an order of the local board of review, or an order of a county board of equalization. However, a person filing an appeal in the small claims division of the tax court still must first appeal to the local board of review and county board of equalization. In the case of an appeal or petition concerning property valu- ations for which the assessor, a local board of equalization, a county board of equalization or the Commissioner of Revenue has issued an order, the officer issuing the order is to be notified of the filing of the appeal. Also, this act makes it clear that appeals from the assess- ment or taxation of mobile homes and other personal property tax may be filed directly with the tax court or transferred by the district court to the tax court. This law had re- quired that appeals dealing with the assessment or taxation of mobile homes and personal property be filed with the • district court. This act was signed on March 28, 1978 and is effective retroactively to July 1, 1977 . CHAPTER 691 PERMITS THE ELECTORS OF THE TOWN OF WHITE TO SET THE COMPEN- SATION OF THE TOWN ASSESSOR Chapter 691 permits the electors of the Town of White in St. Louis County to set the compensation of the town assessor at the annual town meeting or a special town meeting. This act was signed into law on March 28 , 1978 , and was effective as of August 1, 1978 . CHAPTER 719 CALLS FOR CITIES WITH MAJOR ELECTRIC GENERATING FACILITIES TO BE EXEMPT FROM PER CAPITA LEVY LIMITS Chapter 719 calls for cities with a major electric generating facility located inside their borders to be exempt from per capita levy limits. The electric facility must be capable of generating 500 megawatts or more for transmission and distribution to consumers. This law change results in the cities of Becker, Monticello and Red Wing being exempt from 5 per capita levy limits. The act was signed into law on ' March 28, 1978 and was effective for property taxes levied in 1978, payable in 1979, and later years. CHAPTER 721 CALLS FOR THE QUALIFYING TAX AMOUNT USED IN APPLYING FOR THE PROPERTY TAX REFUND TO BE INCREASED FROM THE AMOUNT OF GROSS TAX ON ONE ACRE TO THE AMOUNT OF GROSS TAX ON TEN ACRES FOR NON-FARM HOMESTEADED PROPERTY; REQUIRES THAT A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF THE TACONITE PRODUCTION TAX MONIES BE PAID TO THE RANGE ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPALITIES AND SCHOOLS; AND PERMITS MONEY TO BE TAKEN AWAY FROM THE NORTHEAST MINNESOTA ECONOMIC PROTECTION FUND IF NOT ENOUGH MONEY IS IN THE TACONITE PROPERTY TAX RELIEF ACCOU14T TO PAY THE FULL AMOUNT OF THE • TACONITE TAX RELIEF CREDITS TO HOMEOWNERS Chapter 721 is the 1978 Omnibus Tax Bill. This act is pri- marily aimed at reducing the state' s income tax. However, three sections contained in the act focus on property tax law changes. A description of the property tax measures contained i^ the Omnibus Tax Bill is given below. Article IX, Section 2 of the act provides that the qualifying tax amount used in filing for the property tax refund is to be increased from the amount of gross tax on one acre to the amount of gross tax on ten acres of residential homesteaded • property. This section of the act is effective for property taxes payable in 1980 and later years. Article IX, Section 3 calls for 0. 20 cent of the tax on each ton of taconite to be paid the Range Association of Munici- palities and Schools. The money is to be used by the Asso- ciation for the purpose of providing an area-wide approach to problems on the Iron Range caused by mining operations. Also, the money is to be used to promote the general welfare and economic development of the cities, towns and school districts on the Iron Range. This section of the act was effective July 1 , 1978. • Article IX, Section 4 calls for money to be taken from the northeast Minnesota economic protection fund if the taconite tax relief account does not contain enough money to pay the maximum taconite tax relief credits under the law. The law had required that the percentages and maximums used in determining the taconite tax relief credits be reduced if not enough money was in the taconite tax relief account to pay for the full amount of the credits called for under the law. This section of the act is effective for property taxes payable in 1979 and later years. • • 6 CHAPTER 722 • DEFINES THE OF FARM OPERATIONS 11RI`: CORPORATION FOR THE `�j CLASSIFICATI ON Chapter 722 defines "farming" for purposes of a family farm corporation to mean the production of agricultural products, livestock, livestock products, milk or milk products or • fruit or other horticultural products. it does not include the processing, refining or packaging of agricultural pro- ducts, nor the provision of spraying or harvesting services by a processor or distributor of farm products. Also, it does not include the production of timber or forest Tproducts or the production of poultry or poultry p ro was signed into law on April 40, 1978. No effective date was given and so, by law, it was effective' August 1, 1978. CHAPTER 726 LETS COUNTIES AND CITIES UNDERTAKE PROJECTS WITHIN LAKE * IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS LOCATED INSIDE THEIR BOUNDARIES AND PERMITS THEI" TO ASSESS THE COST OF THE PROJECTS UPON THE BENEFITED PROPERTIES Chapter 726 permits counties and cities to undertake pro- jects inside lake improvement districts located within their boundaries . And, permits counties and cities to assess the benefited properties for the cost of the projects. Before the law change, counties and cities were permitted to pay for the cost of projects through service charges on the users of services inside the district or a property tax levy on properties located within the district, but not through special assessments. This act was signed into law on April 5 , 1978 , and was effective as of April 6, 1978 . CHAPTER 749 PROHIBITS THE APPEAL OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS UNDER THE PROCE- DURES IN DISTRICT COSRT FOR APPEALING THE VALIDITY OR AMOUNT OF REAL ESTATE TA X Chapter 749 makes clear that the validity of special assess- ments cannot be appealed under the procedures in district court for appealing the validity or amount of a real estate tax assessment. Also, this act increases the period that people have to appeal a special assessment to the district court from 20 to 30 days. This act was signed into law on April 5, 1978 and was effective April 6. 1978. However, the act is not to apply to any appeal filed before April 6 , 1978. • 7 • CHAPTER 756 CALLS FOR THE PAYMENT OF PROPERTY TAX BY PERSONS LEASING REAL ESTATE OWNED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND PROVIDES FOR • /1 A METHOD OF TAXATION FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE FORT SNELLING MILITARY RESERVATION Chapter 756 makes clear that property taxes must be paid on real estate leased for three or more years from the federal government. • This act also provides that the value of property held under a lease from the State of flinnesota for a term of three or more years which is within a federal reservation; conveyed to the State of Minnesota by the federal government; and had been occupied and used by a branch of the armed services of • the United States is to be no greater than the value added to the property by improvements made by the lessee. This section of the act applies to property located on the Fort Snelling f/Iilitary Reservation. The only tax levy that applies to this property at Fort Snelling is the Hennepin County levy; there is to be no levy for school, municipal or • special purposes. This act was signed into law on April 5, 1973 and is effective for property taxes levied in 1978 , payable in 1979, and later years. CHAPTER 766 • EXTENDS THE DATE FOR THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION TO LET COUNTY AUDITORS KNOW OF AN APPORTIONMENT OF A LEVY BECAUSE OF UNEQUAL ASSESSMENT PRACTICES BETWEEN COUNTIES HAVING A COMMON TAXING DISTRICT; REQUIRES ASSESSORS TO FURNISH COPIES OF FIELD CARDS TO HOMEOWNERS; AND MAKES CLEAR THE METHOD TO BE USED IN DE`T'ERMINING THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TAX LEVIES • Chapter 766 extends from September 15 to November 15, the date for the state board of equalization to notify county auditors of an apportionment of a levy. The law had called for the state board to notify county auditors between August 15 and September 15 of an apportionment of a levy to compen- sate for unequal assessment practices among counties having an overlapping taxing district. Under the law, the state board can apportion the levy of a taxing district over- lapping county boundaries if the Department of Revenue ' s sales ratio studies show that the average level of assess- ment in the portions of the district in each county differ by more than ten percent. The extension of the date for notifying county auditors was needed because the information to make the apportionment of the levy was not always avail- able by September 15. This section was effective April 6 , 1978. • This act also permits the owner of a homestead to obtain from the assessor a copy of the field card relating to the most recent appraisal of his or her home. The assessor is permitted to charge the owner of the homestead a fee to cover the cost of furnishing the copy of the field card. • 8 J, There is no effective date for this section of the act, therefore by law it is August 1, 1978. • Two sections of this act deal with the levy made in the seven county metropolitan area by the Metropolitan Council. The first of the two sections calls for the levy limitation of eight-thirtieths of a mill to be applied to the total assessed valuation of all taxable property located in the metropolitan area. In 1977 , the Commissioner of Revenue, acting as the State Board of Equalization, apportioned the levy of the Metropolitan Council according to the adjusted assessed values as determined by the Equalization Aid Review Committee. This resulted in the Metropolitan Council ' s levy exceeding eight-thirtieths of a mill in two of the seven counties in the metropolitan area. The question then arose • as to whether the levy limitation applied to the valuation in the seven counties as a whole or to each county separately. This section makes it clear that the levy limit applies to the seven counties as a whole. The second section dealing with the levy of the metropolitan • Council provides that the Commissioner of Revenue is to determine whether the tax imposed by the Metropolitan Council is within the levy limitation under the law. If at all possible, the determination of the levy limitation is to be made by December 1 of each year. If information fegarding the assessed valuation in any county is not transmitted to • the Commissioner in time for him to make a determination as to whether the tax is within the levy limitation, the Com- rlissioner is to estimate the current assessed valuation in that county for purposes of making the determination. The above two sections of the act are to be effective for pro- perty taxes levied in 1978 , payable in 1979 , and later years. CHAPTER 767 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE PROPERTY TAX LEGISLATION Chapter 767 represents suggested tax law changes that had been proposed by the Department of Revenue. The law changes contained in the act are designed to clear up or correct legislation passed in earlier years and to improve the administration of the state ' s tax laws . The sections of • this act that pertain to the property tax are described below. MAKES CLEAR THAT SALES RATIO STUDIES CAN BE USED IN BOTH THE TAX COURT AND DISTRICT COURT • Section 1 makes clear that the sales ratio studies prepared by the Department of Revenue are to be admissible as a public record without foundation in both the district court • 9 and the small claims division of the tax court. The 1977 ' Omnibus Tax Bill called for the use of sales ratio studies only in the district court and in actions pertaining to the • determination of school aids. However, the Tax Court Bill passed into law in 1977 also called for the use of the sales ratio studies in the small claims division of the tax court. Section 1 removes this conflict in the language between last year ' s Tax Court Bill and Omnibus Tax Bill. CALLS FOR THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE TO REDUCE CERTAIN PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT APPLICATIONS FILED BY PERSONS WIiO LOST THE HOMESTEAD CREDIT OR AGRICULTURAL AID CREDIT AS A RESULT OF HAVING FILED THE CERTIFICATE OF REAL ESTATE VALUE LATE • Section 3 calls for the Commissioner of Revenue to reduce certain property tax abatements filed by persons who lost the homestead credit or the agricultural aid credit as a result of having filed the certificate of real estate value late. Under this section, if a person receives a bigger refund through the state' s property tax refund program as a result of the loss of the homestead credit or agricultural aid credit, and later files a property tax abatement appli- cation to have his or her property tax bill reduced by those credits, the Commissioner can reduce the amount shown on the application to offset for the bigger refund the person had received because of the loss of the credits. The law requires a person buying a parcel of real estate -to file a certificate of real estate value with the county auditor. If the buyer fails to file a certificate of real estate value, by law, he or she is not to be entitled to the • homestead credit and the agricultural aid credit. However, if a certificate is later filed for sale, the credits can be reinstated by the county board up to June lst of the year. This can result in a person receiving a property tax bill that shows a total gross tax not reduced by the credits. In turn, this person can file for a property tax refund based on that property tax amount and, then, later make an appli- cation to the county board for the reinstatement of the credits. Section 3 of the act is designed to close this loophole in the law. ESTABLISHES A NEW CLASSIFICATION FOR CERTAIN HOMESTEADED • RESORT PROPERTY Sections 7 , 8 and 9 pull together into a new classification, the law changes made in 1977 relating to homesteaded resort property. The law changes provided that a portion of home- steaded resort property was to be assessed as class 3b • agricultural homestead property. The new classification is to be known as class 3a property but there are no substan- tive changes in the way such resort property is treated. • 10 CALLS FOR CERTAIN DUPLEXES TO BE INCLUDED IN THE HOMESTEAD CLASSIFICATION • Section 10 provides that an entire duplex is to be entitled to the homestead classification if the owner lives in one of the units already classified as a homestead. If there are three or more units, the value of the real estate must be apportioned between the homesteaded and non-homesteaded portions. The homestead portion is to be classified as • Class 3b, 3c, or 3cc and the other residential units are to be assessed as class 3d. INCREASES THE NUMBER OF ACRES CONSIDERED TO BE A PART OF THE HOMESTEAD ON FARMS OWNED BY FAMILY FARM CORPORATIONS OR PARTNERSHIPS Section 11 increases the number of acres entitled to the homestead credit and class 3b assessment from 120 acres to 160 acres for farms owned and operated by members of a family farm corporation or partnership. This makes the • acreage eligible for the homestead credit the same for all agricultural homesteads. MAKES CLEAR THAT THE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS OF PUBLIC WELFARE PROGRAMS AND THE COSTS OF VOLUNTEER FIREMEN PENSIONS ARE TO BE BUILT INTO THE 1977 PAYABLE 1978 LEVY LIMIT BASE OF COUNTIES AND CITIES Section 13 provides that the amount of the special levy made to pay the administrative costs of public welfare programs in 1976 , payable in 1977 , is to be built into the 1977 , payable 1978 , levy limit base of counties . Also, this • section provides that the amount of the special levy made to pay volunteer firemen pensions costs in 1976 , payable in 1977 , is to be :built into the 1977 , payable 1978 , levy limit base of cities. The 1977 Legislature eliminated a number of special levies • for counties and cities and built the amount of those Levies into their levy limit base. However, a mistake was made in drafting the law that resulted in the amount of the special levy for welfare administrative costs not being added to the levy limit base of counties and the amount of the special levy for volunteer firemen pension costs not being added to • the levy limit base of cities. However, the Revenue Depart- ment did add the amount of those special levies to the 1977 , payable 1978 , levy limit base of counties and cities in order to conform with the intent of the legislation. CALLS FOR THE TACONITE AID TO BE TAKEN AWAY FROM A CITY IF • THE AMOUNT OF CERTAIN AIDS ARE MORE THAN ITS CURRENT LEVY LIMIT Section 35 provides that if the total amount of a city ' s taconite aid, attached machinery aid and local government aid is more than its current levy limit, the amount of aid • 11 over the levy limit is to be subtracted from the taconite municipal. aid the city would have been entitled to receive. Under the 1977 Omnibus Tax Bill, a city' s aid was more than • its levy limit the year before. However, it is more logical to compare a city' s current levy limit to its current year ' s aid in determining the amount of the reduction, if any, in taconite municipal aid. LETS THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE GIVE INFORMATION FURNISHED • BY TACONITE MINING COMPANIES TO COUNTY ASSESSORS Section 36 permits the Commissioner of Revenue to give information supplied by taconite mining companies to county assessors for their use in administering the $10 an acre tax on unmined taconite. Under the 1977 Omnibus Tax Bill, the • information furnished to the Commissioner by taconite mining companies was to be kept confidential for a period of three years. This act was signed into law on April 5, 1978. Sections 1 , 3, 35 and 36 were effective April 6 , 1978. Sections 7 , 8 , 9 • and 11 are effective for taxes levier in 1978 , payable in 1979 , and later years. Section 10 and 13 are effective for taxes levied in 1977 , payable in 1978 , and later years. I CHAPTER 773 LETS COUNTIES AND CITIES MAKE A SPECIAL LEVY TO PAY FOR THE COSTS OF SHADE TREE DISEASE CONTROL PROGRAMS Chapter 773 permits counties and cities to make a special levy to pay for the costs of a dutch elm disease or oak wilt disease control program for taxes levied in 1978 , payable in • 1979 . Before the law change, this special levy was to be terminated with the levy made in 1977 , payable in 1978. This act was signed into law on April 5, 1978 and was effec- tive April 6, 1978 . CHAPTER 786 • EXEMPTS FROM PROPERTY TAXATION THE VALUE OF SOLAR, WIND, OR -� AGRICULTURALLY DERIVED METHANE GAS SYSTEMS Chanter 786 exempts from property taxation the value of . solar, wind, or agriculturally derived methane gas systems used as a heating, cooling, or electric power source of a building or structure. The system must be installed before January 1, 1984 and the property must not be used to provide energy for sale. This act was signed into law April 5, 1978 and is effective for taxes levied in 1978 , payable in 1979, and later years. • 12 CHAPTER 790 / EXTENDS FOR ONE YEAR THE COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION' S { • AUTHORITY TO RULE WHETHER A RECORD IS CLASSIFIED AS PUBLIC OR PRIVATE Chapter 790 extends to July 31, 1979 the Commissioner of Administration ' s authority to rule whether a record is classified as "public" or "private. " The Commissioner ' s authority to rule on the classification of a record had been scheduled to expire on July 31, 1978 . Under the state ' s privacy law, the Commissioner ' s rulings were only effective to this date. • If a law had not been passed by July, 1978 designating a record as "private" that record was to be classified as a "public" record. As a result of this law change, the Com- missioner' s ruling that the Hennepin County assessor ' s field cards are "private" records has been extended one year. This act was signed into law on April 5, 1978 and was effec- tive as of April 6 , 1978. • • • • • • 13 • • • • Section 10 PENALTIES FOR NOT MAINTAINING STANDARDS FOR A GOOD ASSESSMENT • • • • • • Chapter 423 ARTICLE VI Penalizes Taxing Districts Whose Assessors Do Not Meet Certain Good Assessment Standards • • In order to make sure that properties are more uniformly appraised throughout the state, Article VI calls for local governmental aid monies to be taken away from cities or towns not meeting certain standards for a good assessment. An assessment district is to lose aids in the amount of $1 per person if the coefficient of dispersion in its assess- ments for the year before is more than ten percent but less than 12. 5 percent. If the coefficient of dispersion in its assessments is at least 12 . 5 percent but not more than 15 percent, an assessment district is to lose aids in the amount of $3 per person; and if the coefficient of disper- sion is more than 15 percent, $5 per person. The coeffi- cient of dispersion is a statistical measure of how closely properties are appraised in relationship to the average assessment level. The coefficient of dispersion is small if most properties are appraised close to the average , and large if most properties are appraised far from the overall average. The coefficient of dispersion for a taxing district • is to be determined by the Equalization Aid Review Committee. The 1970 federal census population figures are to be used in determining the amount the local governmental aid taken away from an assessment district. Also, if two or more cities or towns enter into an agreement for the assessment of properties, they are to be considered a single assessment district, All • towns and cities appraised by the county assessor are to be treated as a single assessment district too. The penalties for not meeting the standards for a good assessment are to begin in the calendar year 1980. • O Pr - . f U a mss- 4i-uA 0PEE SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED MUNICIPAL CONSULTANTS 800 OSBORN BUILDING• SAINT PAUL,MINNESOTA 55102•(8121 222-4241 OSMON R.SPRINGSTED,President DAVID L.GOBLIRSCH,Senior Vice President ROBERT D.PULSCHER,First Senior Vice President CAROLYN J WILLS,Vice President&Secretary-Treasurer RONALD W.LANGNESS,Senior Vice President KINGSLEY D.FORNESS,Vice President. 9 April 1979 Mr. Douglas Reeder City Administrator City Hall Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Mr. Reeder: I am returning the data you gave us relative to the proposed Valley Industrial Center - I project. It is our understanding this application for $1 ,000,000 is being made by a partnership comprised of the North American Life and Casualty Company and John Brooks Hauser. It is our further understanding that Northland Mortgage Company will serve as underwriter for the project and will place the mortgage note with one of its institutional investors. This project appears to meet the major requirement of your policy for commercial development financing, including: 1 . The security will be a mortgage on the property and improvements, and the note will be sold to an institutional investor. 2. Northland Mortgage Company is an acceptable underwriter. 3. The building value, according to the application , will be equal to more than 90% of the requested note value. If satisfactory arrangements have been made for the payment of public costs, then items 1 - 5 of your criteria would appear to have been met. I Mr. Douglas Reeder, City Administrator City of Shakopee, Minnesota 9 April 1979 Page 2 You may wish to inquire as to the nature of the partnership regarding degrees of ownership and liability; and the role each of the partners will play in the transaction. This letter should not be considered an endorsement of this project, nor should it be construed in any way as an opinion regarding the need for financing assistance, or the financial viability of the project. If you have any further questions about this matter, please feel free to contact me. Ve.r sincerely yours, Robert D. Pulscher First Senior Vice President :js enc. CI'T'Y OF SHAKOPEE APPLICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS Date : March 28, 1979 North American Life and Casualty Company and .John Brooks Hauser Applicant Name ' (Valley Industrial Center - I , a Minnesota General Partnership) Address ' 5244 Valley Industrial Blvd, P.O. Box 272, Shakopee, MN 55379 _ Phone : 445-3242 Location of Proposed Project (address and legal description) : Valley Industrial Boulevard South (approximately 5 acres in the East part of Lot 1 Block 2 Valley Park 1st Addition Please answer fully all of the following questions . Requested documents may be attached : 1 . Specific proposed use of the facility . Office/Warehouse 2 . A list of all of their facilities owned or operated by the applicant . none 3 . How many new people will be employed in Shakopee as a direct result of this proposed project? approximately 12 4 . What is the proposed date for start of construction? Completion of construction? April 1979 - completion September 1979 5 . The estimated cost of the facility classified by: a) Building construction. $922,500.00 b) Furnishings or non-fixed equipment . noise c) Land acquisition . $90,000.00 d) Property development . e) Professional fees . $40,000.00 1) Architectural engineering . ' included in a) Building construction Application for Ii'dustrial Revenue Builds Page 2 2 ) Le ga l $11 ,700.00 3) Fiscal interim Construction interest $35,800.00 f) Other (detail ) . 6 . Applicant ' s legal interest in the land . none 7 . Audited financial statements of the corporation for the immediate past three years . 8 . A description of the corporation, including a resume of owners if privately held, or a resume of major officers and the board of directors of publicly held corporations . 9 . If interim construction financing is required, a commitment for such financing from a reputable lender . 10. A statement as to the final financing vehicle as to whether the instrument should be bonds , mortgage revenue notes , or unsecured debt . mortgage 11 . Method of payment to the City of all public cost . payment from escrow fund and cost if needed 12 . The resume of the underwriters including a listing of five other comparable offerings which have been placed with that under- writer . 13 . A listing of all other corporate debt by amount , date of obli-ation, annual required payments , obligee, and type of security . see financial statement igned (Date) Valley Industrial Center Business Purpose 'the purpose and business of the Partnership shall be limited to the acquisition of land and construction of an office/warehouse to be located on Valley Industrial Boulevard south, and the operation of the project as a rental operation, including maintenance and management of the property, construction and repairs to the property, marketing, leasing of the property or portions thereof, and any and all other, activities necessary or desirable ill the judgment of the parties to carry out the stated purpose. NORTHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY March 14, 1979 Honorable Mayor and City Council City Hall Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Re: Proposed Issuance of Commercial Development Revenue Bonds of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (Valley Industrial Center One, a Minnesota General Partnership Project Owner) Gentlemen: At the request of Valley Industrial Center One, we have been asked to provide you with a resume of our qualifications as a source of funds on the above referenced project and to list five comparable offerings which we have recently placed. Northland Mortgage Company now services approximately $1 billion in mortgages in the United States, with offices in St. Louis, Kansas City, Phoenix, Des Moines, Omaha and Milwaukee. We represent the following lenders : American National Insurance Company Central Life Assurance Company Connecticut General Life Insurance Company Crown Life Insurance Company The Great-West Life Assurance Company Home Life Insurance Company Life and Casualty Insurance Company of Tennessee Lutheran Brotherhood Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Modern Woodmen of America The Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York National Fidelity Insurance Company Nationwide Life Insurance Company New England Mutual Life Insurance Company North American Life and Casualty Company Northwestern National Life Insurance Company Occidental Life of California The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company of Philadelphia Washington National Insurance Company Western Life Insurance Company 6600 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH ` MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435 ` TELEPHONE 612/920-4555 NORTHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY Honorable Mayor and City Council Page 2 March 14, 1979 Locally, we have financed such projects as the IDS Center, the Baker Block, Southdale Shopping Center, and several hotel/motel facilities along I-494 in Bloomington. The following is a list of deals we have recently arranged tax-exempt mortgage financing on: Skyline Square Office Building Burnsville Federal Land Shopping Center Burnsville Thriftway, Inc. Shopping Center Burnsville Marshall Square Shopping Center Marshall R & C Burgess Office/Warehouse Building Plymouth We feel well qualified and more than adequate to serve as underwriter on this proposal. Should you or any members of your staff have any questions regarding our qualifications, I would be happy to answer them at anytime. Very truly. yyo1urs,�� William D. Balsiger Vice President WDB:l f Enclosure I R C+� RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROJECT UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, REFERRING THE PROPOSAL TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES FOR APPROVAL, AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AND PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the City) , as follows : Section 1. Recitals. 1 . 01. The Legislature of the State of Minnesota, in Minnesota Statutes , Chapter 474 , as amended (the Act) , has found and declared that the welfare of the State requires active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce through governmental acts to prevent, so far as possible , emergence of blighted lands and areas of chronic unemployment ; has authorized municipalities to issue revenue bonds to finance, in whole or in part, the costs of the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement and betterment of projects , including any properties , real or personal , used or useful in connection with a revenue producing enterprise engaged in any business; and has authorized municipalities to enter into "revenue agreements" , as defined in the Act , with any person, firm, or public or private corporation or federal or state governmental subdivision or agency (the "Contracting Party" ) providing for the payment by the Contracting Party of amounts sufficient to provide for the prompt payment of principal of and interest on the revenue bonds. 1 . 02 . Pursuant to the authority of the Act , it has been proposed that the City issue its revenue bonds in an amount sufficient to pay all or part of the costs of the acquisition, construction, improvement and betterment of certain real and personal properties within the City to be used by Valley Industrial Center One , a Minnesota general partnership (the Partnership) , as a 62 , 400 square foot office warehouse project (the Project) , and to make the proceeds of the sale of those revenue bonds available to the Partnership, who will agree to pay the City amounts sufficient to pay promptly the principal of and interest on the revenue bonds, and to cause the Project to be constructed. The Project is presently estimated to cost $1, 000 , 000. 1 . 03 . The existence of the Project would add to the tax base of the City , County and School District in which the City is located , and would provide increased opportunities for employment for residents of the City and surrounding area. 1 . 04 . The City has been advised that conventional commercial financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that OOP the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be significantly reduced, but that with the aid of municipal financing, and its resulting low borrowing costs , the Project is economically more feasible . 1 . 05. The City has been advised that revenue bonds of the City could be issued and sold upon favorable rates and terms to finance the Project. 1 . 06 . There has been presented to this Council a form of Memorandum of Agreement relating to the issuance of revenue bonds of the City to finance costs of the Project. Section 2 . Approvals and Authorizations. 2 . 01. On the basis of the information given the City to date , it appears that it would be in the best interest of the City to issue its industrial development revenue bonds under the provisions of the Act to finance all or part of the costs of the Project. 2 . 02 . The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City and the issuance of revenue bonds for such purposes and in an amount not to exceed $1 , 000, 000 approved , subject to approval of the Project by the Commissioner of Securities and of the purchasers of the bonds as to the details of the bond issue and provisions for their payment. 2 . 03 . The form of Memorandum of Agreement is approved and the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute the Memorandum of Agreement, with such changes as the City Attorney may approve, on behalf of the City. 2 . 04 . In accordance with law, the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Commissioner of Securities for her approval of the Project. The Mayor, City Clerk, City Attorney and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Commissioner with any preliminary information she may need for this purpose, and the City Attorney is authorized to initiate and assist in the preparation of such documents as may be appropriate to the Project, if it is approved by the Commissioner. Section 3. Special Obligations. In all events, it is understood, however, that the bonds of the City shall not constitute a charge , lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable upon any property of the City except the Project, if it becomes the property of the City, and each bond, as, and if issued, is payable solely from the revenues from the -2- 4 Project and property pledged to the payment thereof , and shall not constitute a debt of the City. Adopted: 1979. Mayor Attest: City Clerk (SEAL) -3- MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT THIS MEDIORANDUII OF AGREEMENT, dated as of , 1979 , between the City of Shakopee , Minnesota (the City) , and Valley Industrial Center One, a Minnesota general partnership (the Partnership) , provides as follows : 1. Preliminary Statement. Among the matters of mutual inducement which have resulted in this Agreement are the following : (a) the City is authorized and empowered by the provisions of Chapter 474 , Minnesota Statutes , as amended (the Act) , to issue revenue bonds to defray, in whole or in part, the costs of a project as defined in the Act; (b) the Partnership has proposed that the City , pursuant to the Act , issue its revenue bonds to defray , in whole or in part, the costs to be incurred in connection with the acquisition of certain properties , consisting of the acquisition, construction, furnishing and equipping of certain real and personal properties within the City to be used by the Partnership as a 62 , 400 square foot office warehouse project (the Project) , and that the City and the Partnership enter into a lease, sale or loan agreement or similar agreement satisfying the requirements of the Act (the Revenue Agreement) ; (c) the Partnership wishes to obtain satisfactory assurance from the City that the proceeds of the sale of the revenue bonds of the City will be made available to finance costs of the Project; (d) subject to due compliance with all require- ments of law, the City by virtue of such statutory authority as may now or hereafter be conferred by the Act, will issue and sell its revenue bonds in an amount not exceeding $1 , 000 , 000 (the Bonds) to pay in whole or in part the costs of the Project; (e) the Bonds shall be special obligations of the City and the principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be payable solely out of the revenues derived from amounts payable to the City by the Partnership pursuant to the provisions of the Revenue Agreement. 2 . Undertakings on the Part of the City. Subject to the conditions stated in (d) of paragraph 1 hereof , the City agrees as follows : (a) that it will forthwith submit an application for approval of the Project to the Commissioner of Securities of the State of Minnesota; (b) that it will authorize the issuance and sale of the Bonds, pursuant to the terms of the Act as then in force; (c) that, if it issues and sells the Bonds , it will as requested by the Partnership enter into the Revenue Agreement with the Partnership. The lease rentals , install- ment sale payments , loan payments or other amounts payable under the Revenue Agreement will be sufficient to pay the principal and interest and redemption premium, if any, on the Bonds as and when the same shall become due and payable. -2- 3 . Undertakings on the Part of the Partnership. The Partnership agrees as follows : (a) that it will use all reasonable efforts to find one or more purchasers for the Bonds ; (b) that contemporaneously with the delivery of the Bonds the Partnership will enter into the Revenue Agreement with the City under the terms of which the Partnership will provide security to the City for payment of sums sufficient in the aggregate to pay the principal of and interest and redemption premium, if any, on the Bonds as and when the same shall become due and payable . 4 . General Provisions . (a) All commitments of the City under paragraph 2 hereof and of the Partnership under paragraph 3 hereof are subject to the conditions that within twelve months from the date hereof (or such other date as shall be mutually satisfactory to the City and the Partnership) , the Commissioner of Securities of the State of Minnesota shall have approved the Project and the City and the Partnership shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the Revenue Agreement, the Bonds and of the other instruments and proceedings relating to the Bonds . (b) If the events set forth in (a) of this para- graph do not take place within the time set forth or any extension thereof and the Bonds are not sold -3- within such time , the Partnership agrees that it will reimburse the City for all reasonable and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses which the City may incur at the Partnership' s request arising from the execution of this Agreement and the performance of the City of its obligations hereunder, and this Agreement shall thereupon terminate. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Agreement by their officers thereunto duly authorized this day of 1979. THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA By Its Mayor Attest: (SEAL) Its City Clerk VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CE14TER ONE By Its -4- v MEMO TO: Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator FROM: James Karkanen, Public Works Superintendent RE: Bid Tabulations of TV Sewer Inspection System DATE : April 17 , 1979 There were three bidders who answered our TV Specifications, opened at 2 :00 PM April 16, 1979 . Because there are two different types of TV systems on the market, we wrote two sets of specifications to accomodate as many manufacturers as possible . The systems basically perform the same results but use a different type of signal to transmit the audio and RF signal from the sewer camera back to the TV monitor in the control (operators ' ) station. The specifications were identified as SPEC "A" and SPEC "B" . The base bids are as follows : Cues Manufacturing Company Deliver (Cues TV System) SPEC . "B" $17 ,785 .00 ays Itasca Equipment Company (Cherne TV System) 23 ,323 .00 30-45 days Wisota Sales Inc. (Underground Survey System) SPEC . "A" 25 ,970.00 60-75 days Wisota Sales, Inc. , bidding the Underground Survey System (UGS) was bidding under SPEC . "A" . They were the highest bidder. They also failed to submit a price for a power winch at the upstream manhole. This power winch is used to drag the 1/2 inch TV cable from the control unit (van) to the upstream manhole in order to hook up the camera. If a power winch is not used, then manual power must be employed to drag the cable the three block distance to the upstream manhole . This item was a bid item to all bidders and was considered a $1500 to $2000 deletion. I believe that this item is very important to operate this TV system. Itasca Equipment Company bid the Cherne TV system under SPEC. "B" . The specifications called for 1500 feet of TV cable and a reel large enough to accomodate it . By using 1500 feet of cable, we' re capable of stringing and surveying at least three blocks of sewers with a single set up . Itasca only bid 1000 feet (two blocks) of cable . The representative informed me that the factory is going to start manufacturing 1500 feet reels and cables in the near future . That doesn' t help us at this moment . They still only bid 1000 feet which is a substantial savings in money to them. Douglas S . Reeder -2- April 17 , 1979 I believe that the City should purchase the optional items them- selves with quotations from two or three different sources in the Twin Cities area . This will result in substantial savings in the total cost of these items . We found that the distributors generally purchase these items at about the same price that we can, then add their profits to these prices . I 'm suggesting that we contact two or three manufacturers , obtain quotations , then act to purchase them at a later date . This will also allow us to look further into the audio-visual items in greater detail . It must be noted that this specifications were for the basic component system for the sewer television system. It is our intent to install the system ourselves in a step van which will be purchased separately in a short time. A trailer for the upstream manhole set up will also be fabricated at a later date . Our recommendation is to award the apparent low bid to Cues Manufacturing Company for the purchase price of $17 , 785 .00. We have budgeted $30,000 for the TV inspection system. After purchasing the optional hand held cameras , video tape recorder, TV monitor, microphone , cassette and communication equipment ; plus purchasing the step van, adding installation costs , out total package price for the complete system should be in the neighborhood of $25 ,000 to $26,000. JK/jiw gr( z) MEMO TO : Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator FROM: James N. Karkanen, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Tabulation of Bids for Hydraulic Sewer Rodding Machind DATE: April 17 , 1979 Bids were opened at 2 :00 p .m. April 16, 1979 for the hydraulic sewer rodding machine. The sewer rodder specifications was an- swered only by the Flexible Pipe Tool Co. of 3601 Park Center Blvd. , Mpls. The equipment bid was a SRECO Hy-Power Model HS-38 which meets or exceeds our specifications. The bid price was at $12,821 . We were allowed $1600 trade in of our 1963 Flexible rodder for a net bid price of $11 , 221 . We had budgeted $12 ,000 for this item. SRECO is the new name for the old Flexible Sewer Rodder. It is our opinion that this sewer rodder is, by far, the more superior rodder on the market today. It is our understanding that there is only one rodder in Minnesota that is not a Flexible, at this time. The City of Eagan has just purchased an identical model HS-38 at a cost of $11 ,000 in January of 1979 . Other SRECO Rodders recently purchased in the past three months are Austin - $11 ,000 and Aitken - $11 , 200. We ' re recommending that the Council purchase the SRECO HS-38 from Flexible Pipe Tool Co. in the amount of $11 , 221 . JNK/klk at S1 MEMO TO: City Council FROM: Douglas S . Reeder RE: Appointment to Community Service Board DATE: April 12 , 1979 The Council has requested to make an appointment to the City position on the Community Service Board which is now filled by Gloria Vierling. Her term expired April 1 , 1979 . Mrs . Vierling is interested in reappointment for another term. DSR: lw s gIn 1979 CITY OF SHAKUPEF _ CHECK REGISTER — _ _ —_ 04_lZ 19 _pAG 1 z CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRiPfION, ACCOUNT NO., mv. N P.O. N MESSAct , Ofl0300 03/21/79 — 43.94- KOKESH ATHLETIC SUP. GEN, SUPPLIES 11-4220-811-P1 3761 ° 080300 n3/21/79 43.94 KOKESH ATHLETIC SUP. GEN.SUPPLIES 11-4220-911-81 3761 ; to 0 n ,z 'o 101003 04/11/79 18.50 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY GEN.SUPPLIES 01-4220-441-44 �+ 101003 04/11/79 1.49 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY SMALL TOOLS 01-4225-441-44 101003 04/11/79 _ — 1410_44 --_ AUTO CENTRE SUPPLY _._•EQUIP MA_ZNj, ___ _ 0j-4230.�31 3�__-_—________--____._-_.!+o +� ioioo3 04/11/79 146.31 AUTO CENTRAL JUPPLf, VEMIC MAINT° 01-4232#31to3i 14) 1010n3 04/11/79 249.27 AUTO} CENTRAL SUPPLY VEHICLE' MAINT., 01-4232b421.42 +�) 101004 n4/11/79 92.74 ANDERSON ELECTRIC GEN.SUPPLIES 01-4220-311-31 7490 8274 27 101006 04/11/79 37.50 AIRCOMM COMM.SY9.MAINT. 01-4233-311-31 27953 ` 37.50 * ,: J 2 .tlr _1-0100e 04/11/14 __.168.16-------�71K�N9 �IR�EQ�IPOLN_.aU PlIE��_�_--_�1w22�±32 L- �32Zd, -- 3 168.76 + _ a. 101012 n4/11/79 5$x14 AStLEFORD •E1iU1P; VEHICLE MAINT, 01-4232-621-62 1363 I; j 101013 n4/11/79 2.75 DENNIS ANDERSON TRAVEL EXPENSE 01-4330-311-31 !47 ll 101013 04/11/79 _ 27-°50-_-- DENNIS ANDERSON ____--_ __.TRAVEI_EXPgNgE_ __--.-.-4-1-4332-311-31. i '- io1013 4/11/74 .$0 DENNI�ANDER90N ?RI�VEL EXPENSE 01. -311031 °i 2.73 ,► -_ - �' !'f f *tte�.tt ��. 101015 04/11/79 12._00 ALPHA_ TOOL_ PRODUC_T9— - - E-O-U P._.M._A. N.T. 03-.4230•.421_._42 _ 3Q5�.------------- - 3 101 t n4/11/79 30.43 AIR-HYDRAULIC SYS. FQUIP.MAINT, 01-4230-421-42 114713 los 30,43 + ++ ** •-cKs 52 -- 10t030 04/11/79 _ _--- 9.90 --- -- WALT ALKEPMAN TRAVEL EXPENSE 01-4330-651-65 _ 9.90 + I,, _ I 101031 nu/11/79 23.48 HILL 9 fiUGGERY PERSONAL EQUTP. 01-4223-421-42 1f4J. �� • "I 23.99 * I7, _ . ***.CKS 1i I 1979 LI TY OP SHAKUPEF- - ---- ---- -- - - -- -- -- CHECK _REGISTER - ._.__. -- --- - - -- -- - --- _ _0.4__j7_,79 __PAGE_ 2- LHECK 1,40. UATF AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT 140. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE a RI 94 BERENS GEN.SUPPLIES 11-4220-311.31 101033 nu/11/79 31. 1e 31.94 * 7 71°I _.j0103y 0a/11�79 - - -`x5,10—� BATTERY- IhoSee S'ERV. VEHICLE MATNT. A1-4232442!-42 86911 +,o 45.10 * „ ***-Cgs 1 to 04/11/79 - 3 456,37 ---- --.-BANK R9 L�� -----.-._�lN a�RE�!,.KEMIT,_----.___41�a92�-g11•o1__-T j R� 101031 04%11/79 39456,37- SWERS LIFE INS• PREM, REMIT• tl3-4925-911- - -- 17 q 1'11V37. 04/11/79 3906.37 BANKERS LIFE tFia* PREM. REMIT, A3-4925 911+91 I,o 1 .CKS + _ _ _. --_ .. .. _ ..._.... ...__.._-_.___.._ _ -•--�.—_._ .—__.__.----___.._-_..e..-�- _�.� .�_-. �—_�..�__._._._—.__._ 115 0 ^I 101040 -14/11/79 133, 1+ BRYAN AGOREGA'T�EJ- ROAD MATERIALS 01�4ag0-427-42 3 177.56 * ri 101041 -14/11/79 -25.9-3 _ - BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS ROAD MATERIALS--- ---- 01.42g0•g27-42 _ -__._. --___ ____ _�},• 25.93 * I 101042 04/1079 --'51.50-- ROD SWINGER --- CENASUPPLIL�S - -- A1-482b�321-32 --- 51.50 1.34* .:, I� 'n «• ---------•------- ***-CKS « ^I :-1 1*0«!«046 n14/11/79 2l.TS * — —BREEGGEMANN__GEORP�----TRAVEL EXPE(0EE ----- -- -1•_g33.�-31.1�31�_-�_ I41 - - 14� Ifi 101051 04/11/79 6.00 BEN FRANKLIN CEN.9UPPLIFS 01-4220-121-12 26 --6,00 *--- - - -- - - -- - -- -1491 ***-CKS 101061 n4/11/79 2.77 COAST TO COAST GEN.SUPPLIES 01-4220-121-12 - n4 All 04/11/79 19.65 COAST TO COAST GEN,SUPPLIES 01-4220-421-42 -- i•. ^., ._ 101061 04/11/79 - - - -25.93- COAST COAST-_-.-_-- _--- R04D_MATER19L.0.___.____ �_41-4244-42Z•92 ___.__------_-.-_- -- ---_-- _-- 101061 04/11/79 25,93 COAST TO COAST ROAD MATERIALS 01-4240-427442 44 22.42 a- l7 4' #***** ***-CKS e, 41 !41.004 -14/11/79 27 IS_ _ CLAY9_.PRINTING _. .. __.QFFICE SUPPLU -_ -_----- s I ee e7 s. 101070 n4/11/79 27.50 CAPITOL ELEC. INC GEN.9UPPLIFS nl-4220-411-41 4536 ,; I 1979 CITY nF SHAKOPF.E CHECK REGISTER 7 72 (t (.HECK tln. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DE3CRIPTON 4C000IYt N0, IN V4 N P.O. At "ESSAGE ' 4 �41 13,242.04 ;e IU1076 04/11/79 10,74 CHAPIN PUB, LEGAL NOT PU8 55-4350-911-91 49630 :01 n , 4 1 iI •***** - ***-CKS �tni t;+ tu1076 n4ifU19 t�I . 200 '. ***-CKS — t „I 10101;7 n4/11/79 7444S _ '• -- - `!:74 S'A CONTINENTAL t . 2/ I IM 101093 04/11/79 46.93 DUNNING 9 HnWE. GEN.SUPPLIES 01-4220-321-32 101493 04/11/79 _ 3320 DUNNjN _� 101093 04/11/79 1.80 DUNNING 3 HOWE, GEN.SUPPLIES 01-4220-622.62 101093 04/11/79 2.42 . DUNNING 3 HDWE, OEN.800LIF$ 01-4220-62S-62 =:I 101093 04/11/79. 101093 (1 4/11/79 9.54 DUNNING S HOWE. EQUIP.MAINT, 01-4230-421-42 3> 101493 04/11/79 1.45 DUNNING 9 HOWE. VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-421-42 I - 4 11 -CK3 4J ft,;. 101121 04/11/79 20.18 EASTMAN DRUG GEN.SUPPLIES 01-4220-321-32 ° 101121 04/11/79 12.98 EASTMAN DRUG GEN.SUPPLIFS 01-4220-421-42 33.16—* _4n « KS 11)1 123 04/11/79 124.71 ENVELOPE SALES CO. OFF. SUPPLIES 01-4210-121-12 6(10233 124.71 + }***}* **-CKS !�� 14 IS7 4 ' 101131 nu/11/79 _941$,83 _ ._._.._. ELCC -- , E9L1p .. _� -. - -- - -4511 35L�35 .7_8092 @ cud RC ,718.83 — --- -- - - --_�N * lot !.' 1-11132 n4/11/79 229.00 _ EXECUTUNE OF MPLS._.-- COPAM,3Y3.MAINI, nl-4233-311-31. 3909_. X34 au Sao 101153 n4/11/79 14.79 FIRST NATIONAL PANK GEN.SUPPLIES ni-4220-15t-15 171 � h 101153 04/11/79 _14.70 FIRST NATIONAL RANK PROF. _SERVICES ^1-4.315-151-15 101153 n4ill%79 14.1n- FIRST NATIOF+AL RANK PRnF. 9EPVICES ni-4315-151-15 , 14.7n **}**} ***-CKS 1 LL ' ;' ---1979 CITY OF SMAKUPEE--__—_._� ------------__ €S1L_FEG�9iER _—___ _-----_---_-- --_-- ------._ f 1 CHECK Ytl. DATE AMOUNT VENOOP ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCULINT NO• INV# N PoUs K MESSAGE I; 101157 n4/11/79 96.90 FLEXIBLF PIPE TOOL EAU;P.MAINT. 71-423n-911.91 4304 96.90 * , - ---- — --- ,q - 80OKS-- - --- O1w4394w321-32 444e 101158 04/11/79 9600- FIRE Wto `AOSRA ObOKS 01-4394.321-32 4446 99.00 * 1! I• � 1A 117, I. le 14� 04/11/79 818.50 GENE HAVER FARMS 61ACN,` RENTA6 01.4352-432-42— ID 1f v ***-CKS ,, 14 1 ioiztu . 04/11/79 6,00 HENia��i= 3 TC -----ri JCL MAINTJ 4 +aP32.3 1.31— : I 101224 04/11/19 3000 MENNEN+3 KELLY t " VEHICLE 14 AI tA 01.4232 4421.42 27 101224 04/11/79_.-- - -- - -- .�.L3� ►L y_._`_ _�J�IiIYE �$� IS�:I.C.x—� V.E�I.bLE_.�S�t� ��OL"4.C32±k21�Q2_�_.._.�� ---------- . 41.00 , 3r ki =1 101234 04/11/79 660,00 HANKINS CHEMICAL CHEMICALS O1.422i*427r42 65214 C **A•CK9 'as ',I 101241 04/11/79 X9,70 MARo1:R ROM_ Utz* 9pOKS 02%4394.141.14 61130 (�2 19,410 A nt *##### , I 101250 04/11/79 1.94_9.00—.—_ ISBERC_RIESENDER6.__._— --PLANNING__—_______�._-01� ;� - -- -- 14949600 ,cl YJ F11 Irq 41 101255 04/11/79 19.36 ITT GRINNELL CO. VEHICLE MAINT. 01.4232-321-32 742847 s� 41. 101256 04/11/79 93,20 IN0t1StRIAL DOOR C0 _ GEN.SUPPLIE9 01+4220.441.44 4443 1-82 Isl I67 ****** ***•CKS �. ff 101259 n4/11/19 132.00 IRM CORP. F.GUIR.MAINT& 01.4230-311131 °I 101259 n4/11/79 666.00 IRM CORP. E8UIP#MAIN1. 01-4230-411-41 694447 �e .al T ****** ***-CKS 7 1; 101267 04%11/79 49.00 ICBn RUCKS 01-4394•!41-14 11093 • Xt� 45.00 * i, - ***-CKS 1979 CITY Of SHAKOPEE -_—CHECK REGISTER _ _ _ _ ------- ._._._- _----------- - 04 17 79 _POGO _ CHECK N0. UATE _ AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M Pj06 N MESSAGE r � • 101291 04/11/79 339.32 KRARS A MANAHAN LEGAL SERVICES 01-4310.161-16 ° r. 101291 04/11/79 92.40 KRASS & MANAHAN LEGAL SERVICES 01-4310.163.16 °y 101291 04/11/79 500.10_ _ KRA13 6 MANAHAN LEGAL JERYICEg—_—^_ 0L�g3JQ-i�5-1¢ 101291 -- 6 4 i i U74__— — -� 35.00 KRa89�MAN-Ti NAN LEGAL 9ERVICE� 59-4310ti-011-91' 966482 * to it („ 10 101292 04/11/79 93.47 KOEHNEN-$ STANDARD VEHICLE, MAINT. 01-4232-311-31 43.47 * Igo ***-CKS ;a 1. Y Sr_ 101302 _04/11/19.-- --------. t .. XREME� >A .Ike ___ YEHICI. IA 1�7_ Qi .l� r_4 ��_oz iret I,. ,. - - - -- 205.80 ----- 17 h` **R• ' i� f, 20 101311 04/11/79 151.50 LAW ENPORCEMENi CE1u,5UpPLIEg 01-4220.311-31 1343 ,z _ s ***-CK9 I� ^� 101314 04/11/79 9S&40 _ATOU10 SHOE S?ORE E9UY A2NT. 01 9230.625.62 22 I; Y 20 9Si40 A a z, zc 101315 04/11/79 - - 395.51 LOGIS EUP EOUIP.RENTAL 01-4384-151-15 1164 395.51 � ibi3t6 04%i1i7� - ---'- —'---� �— -- LATHt�OIA PAINS �l�PLY- �€N,3UPP•L�Ed 01+4220621.62 46573 I 32 27.06 Ivil- 101336 04/11/79 238.90 __ MINN._ EY VALLEY FENCE,_--GEN„SUPPI ='+ 101336 04/11i7q NWR ---- --"23�,�50' MIi, VALL FENCE GEN,SUPPLIES 01-42200625e62 101336 04/11/79 238090•' MINN. VALLEY FENCE GEN,SUPPLIE8 01.4220-62562 "` _ _ _ _ _ _238.90 +�• _ _.. .._ . 101337 04/11/79 10.95 MINNESOTA TRACTOR EOUIP.MAINT. 01-4230-421-42 1226 M1z1 10.95 .n **RR*• *,YR-CKS A] - 101341 n4i13i79 58.85 MAC�JUEEN EQUIP. E41UIP.mAINT. 01-4230-421-42 1822 ^- 58.85 4" 101342 04711i79 - ---Si- e5 - MALKER904 MOtO09 - VEHICLE MATNT. 01-4237-311.31 5. 101342 04/11/7.9 74.02 MALKEPSON MOTORS VEHICLE MATNT. 01-4232-421-42 > R** ** ***•CK ! 101344 04/11/79 -7,BQ. - LARRY MARTIN TRnVE.I EOFN9E 01.4330-141-iq ♦ '°l 7.80 + !01345 04/11/79 8400 MFUA PE,OKS 01-4394-151-15 v.. E ,t 1419 CITY r)F SHAKUPEE ----.--,- -_ - ---- CHECK_REGISTER ---------.-_------------------.---Q4�I_.7Q___P1lGE -b�_ - _� CHECK NQ. DATE AMOUNT VENDUR ITEM DtSCBIPTION ACCOUNT N0: INV, M P.O. M MESSAGE 8,00 7 A 7 O 101349 04/11/79 511600 MOBIL UIL MOTOR FUELS 01.4222-42i-4230842 - ;; _ _ _- -- _ - -5.41390#._...r.�__ .._------=-•_. �12 „ �,e,►�*• ***-CKS ;o - ioi35i o4/ti/T4 i. - 01.4220*421-42 14 101351 04/11/79 3:94 MOTOR PARTS GENOUPPLIFS 01-4220-621P62 1D !' 101351 04/11/19 101351 04/11/79 16.93 MOTOR PARTS VEHICLE MAINT. 01.4232-311.31 101351 04/11/79 16:93- MOTOR PARTS VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-311-31 I21 �^I 101351 .. _ 04/11/79 _._ .__ 79,.23 MOTOR PAR _ YEHICLE MAIN . _41_4?3. -4L-42 _t_ - ------------__,2f 101351 04/11/79 �0 -�-MOTOR PA�tO VEHICLI_I NYN A 01.42326621r6Z `' 101351 04/11179 i0►34. MOTOR PARTS VEHICLelMAINT. 01-4232-621*62 I" a _-- 101351 04/1.1/79 - -----1Qt3A_ MS�ISIR14$1$:.__�____ ____._�tEF1CL�MAIIIT��-- -_ --01�423�• �Ll ��_---- -------- , 101351 04/11/79 1155 MOTOR PARTS VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-622-62 r 101351 04/11/79 122.40 MOTOR PARTS CAP-EQUIP. 01-4511-621-62 3 .,•._ 23519 -,e-- _- .__o. s- o L ni 101374 04/11/79 55.00 MARSHALL 9 SWIFT SUBSCRIPTION 01-4391-141-14 55.00 • ;-° - ;,I ***-CKS 1013A0 04/11/79 _63 a*..tov1.PMENi_�Q._--,__.._.EqUIe.MI�fN�:t-_�.--------91'gZ30�3i1.32 1.0733----. 1013140 n4/11/79 .00 MPLS. EQUIPMENT CO. EQUIP.MAINT. n1-4230-321-32 10733 101380 04/11/79 63.00 MPLS. EQUIPMENT CO. EQUIP.MAINT. 01-4230-321-32 10733 ---- 63.00 ***-CKS , 101386 n4/11/79 23.79 NW BELL PHONE BILL 01-4321-111-11 101386 04/11/79 205.83 Nw BELL PHONE BILL 01-4321-121-12 101386_ 94/11/79 - - 47.58.---.--___Nw BELL---.-___---_.-' -._-. PHONE._AILI,---- ---------.01-4321-141-14.. _-__-_------ "' - - - "'; 101316 n4/11/79 73.72 Nw BELL PHONE RILL 01-4321.151-15 fa 44I 101386 04/11/79 36161 NW BELL PHONE FULL - 01-4321.182-18 h� "' _ 101386 04/11/79 _ -__. .. 2.23.QD _.._...-- Nw. BELL .__- _ _- _. .._..PHONE.. RILL b'' 101316 n4/11/79 38.27 Nw QELL PHONE BILL 01-4321-321-32 101386 04/11/79 23.79 NW SELL PHONE BILL 01-4321-331-33 101386 04/11/79 95,16 - -Nw 1ELL--- - --- - - _ -_ -----PHONE_-.914'1'•---------_.-..._ O1r9321-4.11-4.1-------•---------- ------- +�: 101386 n4/11/79 45.98 Nir SELL PHONE BILL• 01-4321-421-42 " 7O 101386 04/11/79 23.79 MMf PELL PHONE RILL 15-4321-191-19 .� 1 101387 04/11/79 9,426.35 MW SERV, ST, EQUIP. CAP-FQUQP. 01-4511-421-42 829.52 �+ _ ***•CKS j : �L 101397 04/11/79 18,317.34 Nw pI 6-imUUs ooAD CnF;4T. 54-4514.911-91- 1979 CITY OF SHAKOPEE CHECK REGISTER — 04_11 eAG.�_7 _ . ^CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR . ITEM DESCRIPTJON ACCOUNT NO. TNV. Y P.O. M ME9SICE a 18.317.34 a 0 10114o1 n4/11/79 14,i31 NAT. .FIRE PROTECTION SUBSCRIPTION 01-434f-321-32 790650 414 14;37,o ** *** ***-CKS ,v ' 101412 04111 j1q __ ------"-� �w ----- PITNEIMiES -- OFF�9UPPLIE9. T' T 01+�I �d• 1+12 136b36___.___.__ _- e ! 14� 101412 n4/11/79 '234131 PITNET POWES OFF.COUIP.RENTAL 01•4383.1Z1•i2 109365 I,a ,sl 101412 04/11/79 1Q 9 P-11NE Bti.Pl°.�: OE.l.•.E_41 -F—A RATft�" ei!+l d !+3iL3L149;a1E �_!?. :er- _— 521.11 * 72 ( .0 101429 04/11/79 516jo0 POWER SUPPLY CO. GEN.9UPOPLIEb 01-422n-321w32' 37173 ( " 101430 014/11/79 4.80 TOM PEICK TRAVEL EXPENSE 01-4330-411-41 ,, ? 480 7 =;�r 101448 04/11/79 27.90 REYNOLDS WELDING GE�J.SUP—PL IE9 01-4220-421-42 6877 101449 04/11/79 33.25 REYNOLDS WELDING GEN.SUPPLIES 01.4220-441-44 -- I ,a 101449 n4/11/79 69195 RADIO SHACK OFf. SUPPLIES 01-4210-421-42 54103 �. a --101449 04/11/79 * 1.128.84 :i 101450 04/11/79 84.00 RIES HEATING -___-_.--_—B.IDG..,—MAINj,__—__ * 01-�-101li50 P4/11%79 _ _ _ _. -----9,0�--- — RI€y HEATING 9LDG MAINTa 01-4231.311-31 101450 04/11/79 55.66 RIES HEATING OLD96 MAINT. 01.4231-321-32 ',! 101,150 04/11/79 205,4Q_: _AIE9 KATt NG.__-__,_ -- Q1.R. :a.._Ml1XhLi__--_-.___- ____ Q1.423I-441 401 101450 10/11/79 18.00 RIES HEATING BLDG. MAINT. 01-4231-621-62 �0; 372.06 * o A7 G6 .__ - - _ .__—_—._.____—_—______....._—.— -......_.__ - .a 4:� ***.+* - - _ ***•CK 1614 44; Ins 101453 n4/11/79 40 50____ ---- RACE!-OIL _._ _MOTOR_-.FgfL,$_6.1.UF1,__.-•_ Of•,0222-42i!42_.1'�QSS___._. �..—. -------.._ .h:� �GI 44.50 * �6 nu/11/79 s I� 101461 129.21 RuFFRiDGE-J�H��SON r,EN,SUPPLIE3 01-4220.621.62 93327 w� 7n ***-CKS (71 101469 04/11/79 3.60 RON$ SHAKOPFE CLNRS. F11111P.tiAINT. 01-473n-321-32 41695 �y * i» LL E� _1979 CITY OF SHAKOPEE A _- -- _.-_--T CHECK._RE613TER CHECK N0, DATE A110UNT VEND00 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N06 INV. N P.0. 0 MES31GE , ___...:.ice_... '' 101875 04/11/79 198.00 9TREICMER GUNS INC ,3EN.SUPPLIE9 01-4220-311-31 12204 ° 198,00 * ° 9 191477 _ ..-_- 04/31/79.._ ...____.. _ f0�.,55---- -- .sUEL_BUb1NE�- =_ __ OFE3{1ppLIE3---.----_.__ Oi•42Ld« 2i�i2 ---- --_-----------...... ,a 10 101477 04/11/79 3.06 SUEL BUSINE33 OFF. SUPPLIES 01-4210-141-14 13 11 101477 04/11/79 21.00 SUEL BUSINESS OFF, SUPPLIES 01-4210-151.15 ee 12 --.i0i-477_.__ - _ . ../79 _- _ -__ _ b•�-,7�- , ---�uEL_@��LF.;1�.,---..-___OEF._S-UPPLIE�.._._._,Q1-92.1.0-3.i.i-3L.«_�_._-.--------_- ,a 101477 04/11/19 - - 4, SUEL RUBINESS OFFA 6UPP1 E8 01-4210+411-41 " 14 101477 04/11/79 18,53 SUEL BUSINESS 00, 9UPPL ES 01+Ot10+421.-p2 Igo > " 101478 04/11/79 266.40 SHAKOPEE LUMBER GEN.SUPPLIES 01-4220-421•&2 101478 04/11"/79 --- -_-_ ____-_1?•25 ----�AKQPE .�MB�R_-_.-. 301478 04/11/19 11.75 SMAKO�E LUMbEN VEHICLE MAINT, 01+4232-321.32 . s� 240640 1 27 2 r 22 101479 04/11/79 598.63 SHAKOPEE VALLEY PUB, LEGAL NOT, PUB, 01-4350-121-12 21 101479 n4/11/79 15.23 SHAKOPEE VALLEY PUB, LEGAL NOT° PUB, 54-4350-911-91 I;;( I 101480 04/11/79 403.92 SC6tt CTYiSHER}tp ' MAINt, o1-4z33-311-51 2 04/11/19 488.28_--- __�COLT,Ct.tAB.FiE�LE� "- CIlMM��Yai._M�INILa_:_ _-.__.OLw?� -32L-32 « -_-- - -- 31, c zol 872.20 1► 13: C _p i3c , i Z2 101484 04/11/79 32.00 STARK-B- CLEANING BLDG, MAINT. 01-4231-181-18 i,, ';I... 10148.4 ..---- A4/11/79_ . _. .._ _ _-- --_LB�yQ _____-_ 31A!?K��...CLEA.HINO._-_.._._._...._FUG--MAIK`f.-- -----_---. _ 41-4Ulol82i.18.- --- - --- _---------`:" T to1484 n4i11/79 17.00 STARK-S CLEANING BLDG. MAINT•. 01-4231-311-31 �40 101484 04/11/79 26.00 STARK-S CLEANING BLDG. MAINT. 01-4231-421-42 3t" 101485 04/11/79 56,52 SPUC BLDG. MAIN?, 01-4231-181-18 „I 1 01495 - - 04/11/79 �._ELECa_A.TT.ENENI'__.._____ (+1.4370-18i�f8 101485 04/11/79 127.21 SPUC ELEC, 3TTEMENT 01.4370.182-18 164 A11 101485 04/11/79 149.74 SPUC ELEC. STTEMENT 01-4370-311-31 1.2 -A 101485 04/11/79 t. .--._ - -113.177-..--._ 01485 64/11/79 299,46 SPUC ELEC, STTEMENf 01-4370-421-42 44 101485 04/11/79 211.77 BPUL` ELEC. 31TEMENr O1«4370-427-42 •5 -101485__. _..__ 4/11/79 - ---_._._____..------Z.4►0Q-.._-.._- .9PUQ l014p5 04/11/79 18.25 SPUC ELEC. 37TEMENT 01-4370-625-62 °1 101485 04/11/79 55.38 SPUC ELEC, STTEMENT 01-4370.628.62 Iel '^ _101485 04/11/79 104,00 SPUC ELFC STTEM-N 0 -43 0-639-1+ it fo14e5 �4/fi/79 5.00 gaUC - - -WATER BILL 01-4312-181-i8 °O 101485 04/11/79 34,00 SPUC% WATER BILL 01-4372311.31 �ua 61�__ 101485 - 04/11/79 0 00. WATER: °? 101495 n4/11/79 4.00 SPUC WATER BILL 01-4372-639-62 7 1 .595.57 * li0 i. 101488 04/11/79 2,944.15 911611HRAN Eryr.. F(X. .9FHyjrf.9 23-431?-911-91 796574 _ ____._._ ..__. ��' �' --r1979 CITr 9F SHAKUPEE --------- ---- ---- --- - CHECK REGISTER ------------- --- -- - - ---- --94_x—L9- AGF 9 _ z CHECK ND. GATE AMOUNT-•- VENDOR ITEM UESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. N R.O. A MESSAGE 2,944.1S • -- --- ——__._._ ---- ° a 101499 n4/1t/79 13 19 SOPERAMERICA —MOTOR FUE41_ _ 0.1-4222-.311-3.1_jO1p __—..____.__..�� 1ui4e9 n4/11/79 6. 3 SU�ERAMERICA VEHCIEI MAINT. 01-4232-311-3t ,O ° 2002 * n ,V 101011 - n4/11/79 t3.00 ST: FRANC I9 HpSPITAL BLOOD TESTS 01-4425-311-31 " 00. 3 1 141 ,1 * � -_ , Il ***-CKS to } ( ;� 101492 n4/11/79 _---- ---� qs —_ $►1AXC11'EE.HbWE<— -a�,.�1► .lupF1:ILA� ---- `---_0I!�4�2Si�121�A1s'_ _ � ._._ !� +, 101492 04%11%79 38.41 SHAKOPEE HOWE; GEN.SUPPLIES 01+4220-621-62 2i � 101492 04/11/79 4.56 SHAKOPEE HOWEr GEN.SUPPLIES 01-4220-622-62 z- } 101492 04/11/79 24j23 SHAKOPEE HO 14 OL-g225-.6216.2_ _-_— -4 ai d r ****** + I2-1 101499 n4/11/79 10.80 u µ SCOTT CTY.TREAS. OFF. SUPPLIES �T 01-4210-1St-15 101499 04/11/79 _-Ioloo'92 T—_ SCOTT CTrtj.!ZEAS._ TAX_ 9TMj,�_ _— ��`� - Y za! = 101500_ --- -- — - Q3 ±r' • 4,799.20 • ****R* -CKg_ X 3�j 41-.. .._._ , 101505 04/11/79 978,46 sfATE TREASURER 1URCHARGE Rtmlt6 93.4929-911.91 :; R***** ***-CKS _ -- —_401 4.50 +� ° 71 ' 'n 101530 04/11/79 150.00 TRAVEL. DES-IONS _ _ TRAVEL_ EXPENSE___._ _.__ _ _ _11-!!330 101530 (W/11/7V 150.00 TRAVEL_ DESIGNS TRAVEL: EXPENSE- 01-4330-411.41 no 4.: 300.00 +� a� fA 4e' 101531 (14/11/79 24.44 H.R. TULL CO. GEN.SUPPLIES nt-422n-321-32 22320 i 24.44 * Io, e,l 101541 04/11/79 556,2 ----- - UNIFORMS UN4ImI.TED . . . . CLnTHING 556.20 :o r. 10154e )4/11/79 15.00 U.S. PU9T-ASTER POSTAGE - 01-4320-311-31 ._.__ . _ ._ _.....___ ___..-__ _-_— 15.0� +► _ J ' 't 5L` _ -.. �*ALsCK3_. LL 1979 CITY OF SHAKUPEE CHECK_REGISTER _ _. __0.4.11.,.7.9-PAGE-A 0------ = CHECK NO. OAT AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO, xNV;,. * P.O. M NE83AGE _ a " 101565 04/11/79 t,495.80 VON KLUG R ASSOC. PROF, SERVICES 15-4315-196-19 ° ' 1,495.80 * o - ,► ,► • ***-CKS �o !01577_-- - - (ti4/11/79 1 a1� _ 3i0.�lPLL�15 _3A -,t t1 $� _PICK+UP._-- -- ------.0-1�y373�181Ri8_ ._.�_.� _----'-2 101571 n4/11%79 3.02 WOUDLAKE SANITATION TRASH PICK-UP 01-4373-18218 ho Is" 101577 04/11/79 26.88 WOOOLAKE SANITATION TRASH PICK-UP 01-4373-311-31 101577 04/11/79- ._. _. 15.13 WOOD�.AKE_SAN TATI.ON_ _-_--.IRA9H .PICK-UP 101577 04/11/79 cb,g �� WOODOKE 9ANl5fl-bN TRASH PICK-UP 01-4373-421-42 17 14-. 10!577 - 04/11/79 .. 26.88 '. OtOODLAKE SANITATION TRASH. PICK-UP. 01-4373-622-62 - 10 I9 101577 .-.-.-- 04111/7-9�.__._.._ k 5'3- l _ — -.wClOOL3KE_.86NI.2VIAlil- -.. TRASK_ I.Cx±11P_ -----.----- -Qi�?9.373�!2.L1-2i._—:_. ___ _.: �—_:'`��__!o 69968.22 * 122 z ' ' 101578 n4/11/79 24 5 T�tITIR!Q"7i?MN OFF,_oUP%..I.� 19 101578.._. 04/11/79 --•-- -- — 3-- --- N OFFt' SUPPLIES 01+4210 411-41 �_� ***-CKS x 101584 04/11/79 0 wJLtCQX_ PAPER_C _._ Al IE , a 101601 04/11/79 36.48 ZIEnLER INC EOUIP.MAINT. 01-423n-421-42 26003 err i 36,48 * --- —.— - - - ---- 14; :1 ****** ***-CKS 4 1ut6nb 04/11/79 168.60 Z CO. GEN.SUPPLIE9 0l-0220-321-32 98214 4'_ • � en 3 ****** ***-c KS 41 :o 192485 14/11/74 _SLUG_ '^ 1024x±5 04/11/79 5100- SPUC WATER PILL 01-4372-181-18 102485 04/11/79 4.00 SPUC WATER BILL 01-4372-639-62 102485 A4/11/79-- UO- --, ---._SoU4. _______-.._.- --.-- _.-WATE-R_SILL__.-- -_- ____-- - _01-4372_634�F2__.._--- _ --_-_- <: - _ _ -� �. 4f - i,i7 c _t 48 017.99 FUND 01 TOTAL 67 11519.59 F'7ND 15 TOTAL a�1 - -- _. -- --- --- Zl94q.75-- _ _...._. FUND-23 TOTAL.- � . "1 !•100.92 FUND 41 TOTAL 35:00 FUND 52 TOTAL 167 s -- - I0101m,I. ---- __._FUND ..59_TOTAL _ _-:_ __: __. - --- --- — --- _.-- - - _ _.—_�._____ a„ 50.74 FUr4D 55 TOTAL o - 96.90 FUNV 71 TOTAL 77 lb�b_98.45 FUNr- 81 TOTAL - - -- ------_--_ ------- 978.06 FIIND A3 TOTAL I„ 89.7.75.37 - TUTAL DEBIT ACCOUNT CREDI1 ACCOUN"' AMOI N f _BATCH REMARKS VENIIUR CHE_C;K A"_ J1 ..4330.421 .42 01 . 1010 .000.00 9.90 Travel Expense Todd Brinkhaus 9 .90 01 .4391 .311 .31 " 12.00 Subscription Criminal Just . Pub. 12.00 01 .4315 .321 .32 " 59. 25 Physical Exam Chaska Med. Center 59 . 25 01 .4394.311 . 31 " 14.31 Books; JOssey-Bass , Inc . 14. 31 01 .4391 . 311 .31 " 15 .00 Subscription Nat. Counc . Crime 15 .00 01 .4980. 911 .91 25 .00 Refund Perkins 25 .00 01 .4425 .311 . 31 " : " 87 .00 Blood Tests St . Paul Ramsey 87 .00 01 .4390. 311 . 31 405 .00 School St. Cloud State 405 .00 01 .4315 .711 . 71 60.00 Prof . Services Software Con. 120.00 71 .4315 . 911 . 91 71 . 1010.000.00 60.00 747 .46 747 .46 General Fund 01 687 .46 San. Sewer 71 60.00 747 .46 { r (mot f F ` ROBERT J. 5CHMITZ �� -. v� � • - - Senator 36th District Jordan, Minnesota 55352 - - Office: State Capital St. Senate St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 (612) 296-7157 State of Minnesota April 3, 1979 Mr. Douglas S. Reeder City Administrator City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mr. Reeder: Enclosed is a copy of the bill I had drawn up for the Shakopee Amusement Tax, per your request. I would appreciate it if you would look the proposed bill over, . and let me know whether or not it will meet your needs. Sincerely, ert J. Schmitz State Senator 36th District RJS/ch Encl. JED 'ec , Isis CV OF Sp� COMMITTEES • Vice Chairman, Local Government Transportation General Legislation • Electionsy 79-2567 <REV1SUR > HW 1 A b l l t for an act 2 relating to the city of Shakopee; permitting the 3 city to impose an amusements tax; providing for 4 its administration . 5 6 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF KINNESOTA: 7 Section 1. Subdivision 1. The city of Shakopee may 8 impose an amusements tax on all or any class of sates of 9 food , refreshments, services , or merchandise served or 10 provided in all or any class of bars , restaurants, halts , 21 cabarets, or other open or enclosed public places where 12 entertainment , except mechanical music alone, is afforded 13 the patrons. The tax shalt be at a rate set by the city . 14 Subd. 2. As far as possible a tax imposed under this 15 act shall be collected by the commissioner of revenue along 16 with the state general sales tax imposed by Minnesota 17 Statutes , Chapter 297A9 at the same time, in the same 18 manner , and subject to the same rules and the same interest 19 and penalties for nonpayment . 20 Subd. 3. On Apr i f 15 and quarterly thereafter or at 21 other times and intervals as prescribed by rules adopted 22 under this subdivision , the state shall , after deducting 1 W 79-2567 <REVISLR > HN 1 the costs of collection , distribute the net amount of the 2 tax to the city of Shakopee. The commissioner shall adopt 3 rules as necessary to make practicable the collection of 4 the tax provided for in this act , with the state sales tax. 5 Subd. 4 . Money received by the city of Shakopee from 6 taxes levied pursuant to this act may be spent for any 7 authorized purpose. The amount of the money shall not be 8 included within the definition of any limitation imposed on 9 taxing or spending or as part of the cost of government 10 within the meaning of any statutory or charter limitation. 11 Sec . 2. This act shall be effective upon approvat by 12 the governinq body of the city of Shakopee and compliance 13 with Minnesota Statutes , Section 645 .321 . 2 M E M 0 To : Douglas Reeder, City Administrator _ From: LeRoy Houser, Building Inspector Re : Pre-Built Homes - Modular Date: April 5 , 1979 Attached you will find a copy of the laws governing prebuilt homes . The homes and plans are approved by the State and inspected during construction in the plant by the State. On application for Building Permit they submit ; (a) Survey; (b ) Set of plans with make and model number; (c ) Heat loss calculations . I inspect the footings , foundation, plumbing below floor line and total vent system on final plumbing. The units which Mr. Johnson is erecting are approved and do meet minimum code requirement . Local inspectors do not nor does local government have any authority to legislate them from town. Restrictive deed covenants are the only way to keep them out. I also inspect the visible building components such as floor frame , end wall sheathing for type and to see if it complies with the nailing schedule ; attic ventilation, smoke detectors, fire separation between garage and dwelling, door closure between garage and dwelling; building trim and kitchen hood vents; heating system for location and clearance in front of all valves and fresh air directly to the furnance from the outside . LFH :plk STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION SAINT PAUL 406 METRO SQUARE BUILDING CODE 7TH AND ROBERT STS. DIVISION ST. PAUL, MN :15101 April 6, 1979 LeRoy Hauser, Building Official City of Shakopee 129 East First Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Manufactured Buildings Dear Mr. Hauser: The regulations governing manufactured buildings are contained in the Minnesota Prefabricated Structures and Manufactured Buildings Code which has been incorporated into the Minnesota State Building Code. The regulations may be found in Volume 2 of the Minnesota Code of Agency Rules 2 MCAR 1.10301 through 2 MCAR 1.10336. Section 2 MCAR 1.10306 Certification, states "Manufactured buildings and building components which are sold, offered for sale or installed in the state shall bear a seal evidencing fthe State Building Inspectors Certification of Code Compliance. Such certification shall be conclusive on all agencies, instrumentalities and municipalities of the state. The meaning of the code is clear and requires that all municipalities must accept the Manufactured Building Seal as evidence of compliance with the State Building Code, and must issue a building permit if all other local requirements are met. The code assigns the responsibility for inspection of the closed portions of a manufactured structure to the State Building Inspector, and assigns to the local authority the responsibility for determining that the installation is completed in accordance with its certification (2 MCAR 1.10311). The code allows the local enforcement agency to inspect all portions of the structure, provided such inspection does not require the removal of permanent parts of the structure. The code requires that evidence of non-compliance found must be reported to the State Building Inspector. The goal of the code is to allow the sale of manufactured structures that meet the minimum requirements of the State Building Code in all areas of the state. The code also provides procedures for obtaining remedial action if a structure is found to be deficient, and imposes the responsibility for enforcing the code on the State Building Inspector. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Page Two LeRoy Hauser April 6, 1979 2 MCAR 1.10314 contains the requirements relating to the application for, and issuance of building permits for manufactured structures If we can be of any further assistance please call me at 612/296-4628. Respectfully, BUILDING CODE DIVISION R. I . Hauck L- Section Chief `' Manufactured Structures RIH/cc M E M 0 To : City Council From: LeRoy Houser, Building Inspector Re : Housing Date : April 9 , 1979 For your general information I would like to bring you up to date on terminology and definitions regarding housing. MOBILE HOMES : . . . . . . . Is a dwelling unit on wheels that is mobile and can be moved from location to location without modification of the under frame . The under frame is steel and is affixed to the unit itself. The wall sections may be constructed of 2x3" , unlike the modular or prebuilt which have 2x4" walls . MODULAR : . . . . . . . . . . . . Is a dwelling unit that is composed of standardized units or sections for easy construction. You may order the standard section of one model and keep ordering and adding onto the base unit . This unit is much like the prebuilt . PREBUILT : . . . . . . . . . . . A prebuilt unit is a dwelling unit that is constructed entirely in- a factory in one or two sections, shipped to the construction site and set on a foundation. The under frame of this unit is always constructed of wood, unlike a mobile home . The prebuilt, upon delivery, is slid off the trailer and wheels used for shipping and is no longer mobile because the plumbing, heating and foundation system are all below floor level and connected to the structure . TRACT HOUSING : . . . . . . Is usually a development where the builder uses one or two model homes for the entire tract. They may be stick built on site, modulares or prebuilts. STICK BUILT : . . . . . . . . Is a dwelling unit entirely constructed on site by the builder. LFH:plk All I- ALL-AMERICA CITY MAIN t 202 East Jackson Street Box 3368 M, y y�hl. M�9 April 3, 1979 s R E EF I QED Dougl as S. Reeder APR - 4 1979 Clerk-Administrator City Hall CITY OF SMAKOAM" 129 E. lst Avenue Shakopee, MN. 55379 'L Dear Mr. Reeder: When we first wrote to cities requesting contributions to defray tax increment lobbying expenses, we thought that city officials were acquainted with the proposition. After our letter was received, a number of cities raised questions concerning the matter so that additional information is clearly indicated. The question of a special assessment to support tax increment lobbying was first discussed and agreed to at a meeting of the League/NAHRO Committee meeting in Alexandria in August of 1977. The issues were again discussed and supported at a similar meeting in July of 1978. Based upon these understandings, a budget was drawn and an assessment schedule established. Both are enclosed for your information. Please note that the budget does not support. the League of Cities lobbying staff, but pays for technical back up and the services of a special counsel , namely, Jim Holmes. The technical staff and attorney Jim Holmes have already worked to produce the League supported tax increment bill S.F. 257 and H.F. 451 . We expect to support the enactment of these bills vigorously. We hope that you will join us in financing this effort. Your assessment amount is included in the assessment table. Please forward your pay- ment to the League of Minnesota Cities, 300 Hanover Building, 480 Cedar Street, St. Paul , MN. 55101 . William Bassett, City Manager can Otterson HRA/St. Cloud cc: Mayor Mankato is an affirmative action,equal opportunity employer. NAME OF MUNICIPALITY POPULATION ASSESSMENT Albert Lea 19,418 $ 717.00 Amboy 571 50.00 Annandale 1 ,234 75.00 Appleton 1 ,789 100.00 Austin 26,210 955.00 Beaver Creek 235 50.00 Benson 3,549 162.00 Bird Island 1 ,309 75.00 Bloomington 81 ,970 2,906.00 Blue Earth 3,965 176,00 Breckenridge 4,200 185.00 Brewster 563 50.00 Cambridge 2,720 133.00 Cannon Falls 2,072 125.00 Clarkfield 1 ,084 75.00 Crookston 8,312 328.00 Dawson 1 ,699 100.00 Detroit Lakes 6,352 260.00 Duluth 100,578 3,558 00 Edina 48,940 1 ,750.00 Eveleth 4,721 203.00 Farmington 3,104 146.00 Fergus Falls 12,443 473.00 Glencoe 4,217 185.00 Grand Marais 1 ,301 75.00 Granite Falls 3,225 150.00 Hastings 12,195 464.00 Hopkins 13,428 507.00 Hutchinson 8,142 322.00 Jordan 1 ,836 100.00 Lake Crystal 1 ,807 100.00 LeCenter 1 ,890 100.00 LeSueur 3,745 169.00 Luverne 4,703 202.00 Madelia 2,316 125.00 Mankato 30,895 1 ,119.00 Marshall 10,194 394.00 Milroy 247 50.00 Minneapolis 390,000 10,000.00 Minnetonka 35,776 1 ,290.00 Moorhead 29,687 1 ,077.00 Morris 5,366 225.00 Mountain Lake 1 ,986 100.00 New London 736 50.00 Northfield 10,235 396.00 North Mankato 7,347 295.00 North St. Paul 11 ,950 456.00 Pelican Rapids 1 ,835 10000 Pipestone 5,328 224.00 Red Lake Falls 1 ,740 100.00 Red Wing 12,834 487.00 Richfield 47,231 1 ,691 .00 Robbinsdale 16,845 627.00 (OVER) NAME OF MUNICIPALITY POPULATION ASSESSMENT Sauk Rapids 5,051 $ 214.00 St. Cloud 42,223 1 ,515.00 St. Louis Park 48,833 1 ,747.00 St. Paul 309,000 10,000.00 South St. Paul 25,016 913.00 Starbuck 1 ,138 75.00 Stewartville 2,802 136.00 Virginia 12,450 473.00 Waconia 2,445 125.00 Walnut Grove 736 50.00 Waseca 6,789 275.00 Watkins 785 50.00 Willmar 13,362 505.00 Windom 3,952 176.00 Winona 26,438 963.00 Worthington 9,916 385.00 Zumbro Falls 203 50.00 Wayzata 3,700 167.00 Chanhassen 5,054 214.00 d D NAME OF MUNICIPALITY POPULATION ASSESSMENT Sauk Rapids 5,051 $ 214.00 St. Cloud 42,223 1 ,515.00 St. Louis Park 48,833 1 ,747.00 St. Paul 309,000 10,000.00 South St. Paul 25,016 913.00 Starbuck 1 ,138 75.00 Stewartville 2,802 136.00 Virginia 12,450 473.00 Waconia 2,445 125.00 Walnut Grove 736 50.00 Waseca 6,789 275.00 Watkins 785 50.00 Willmar 13,362 505.00 Windom 3,952 176.00 Winona 26,438 963.00 Worthington 9,916 385.00 Zumbro Falls 203 50.00 Wayzata 3,700 167.00 Chanhassen 5,054 214.00 b PLANNING TO USE TAX INCREMENT FINANCE NAME OF MUNICIPALITY POPULATION ASSESSMENT Ada 2,076 $ 125.00 Anoka 13,298 503.00 Aurora 2,531 126.00 Buffalo 3,275 152.00 Cokato 1 ,735 100.00 Columbia Heights 23,997 877.00 Cottonwood 794 50.00 Dodge Center 1 ,603 100.00 Excelsior 2,563 127.00 Faribault 16,595 618.00 Floodwood 650 50.00 Gaylord 1 ,120 75.00 Golden Valley 24,246 886,00 Hollandale 287 50.00 Lakeville 7,556 302.00 Litchfield 5,262 222.00 Little Falls 7,467 299.00 Madison 2,242 125.00 Monticello 1 ,636 100.00 Montevideo 5,729 238.00 New Prague 2,680 131 .00 Olivia 2,553 127.00 Onamia 670 50.00 Owatonna 15,341 574.00 Princeton 2,531 126.00 Redwood Falls 4,774 205.00 Rochester 53,983 1 ,927.00 Rush City 1 ,130 75,00 Savage 3,611 164.00 Shakopee 7,780 31000 St. Peter 8,331 329.00 Sobieski 189 50.00 St. James 4,027 178.00 Thomson 159 50.00 Tower 699 50.00 Trommald 82 50.00 Warren 1 ,990 100.00 Watertown 1 ,390 75.00 Winton 193 50.00 Zumbrota 1 ,929 10000 i 1979 Session Tax Increment Budget_ Period covered by April , 1978 - May, 1979 Expense Personnel - Salaries $30,898.33 Benefits 4,325.77 Office expense - Rent 1 ,718.48 Telephone 1 ,603.00 Secretary 420.00 Mailing 250.00 Photocopying 450.00 Travel and Expense 1 ,600.00 Consultant' s Legal 36,000.00 $77,265.58 * If the Legislature passes a Tax Increment Financing Bill prior to flay, the assessment proceeds will be returned on a proportioned basis . A MEMO TO : Mayor and City Council FROM: Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator RE: Building Inspector DATE: April 10, 1979 The attached memo from Leroy Houser details our summer inspection schedule and indicates that we are in trouble unless we have some help . It is my recommendation that we try to find someone for the summer to help us keep up with the workload . We would use him primarily in housing inspections . We would bring the name and qualifications of the person to you for final approval . It is estimated that the cost would be less than $6 ,000 and the amount of building permit fees over the amount budgeted would cover the cost . DSR/jiw l M E M 0 To : Douplas Reeder, City Administrator From : ],Choy Houser, Bui ldinj; Inspector Subject : Projected Permit Fees/Additional Temporary Help Date : April , 1979 As you know the construction season is upon us. The projected construction volume far exceeds any year we have had in the past . Listed below are the projections of inspection hours, both total and during the summer months of June , July and August , and estimated permit fees for the 1979 season. # Insp.Hrs. # Insp .Hrs . Project Proj . Fees During Const During Summer, K-Mart $ 56 ,000 800 260 Valley Ind . Park (3 possibly 5 bldgs ) 6 , 000 45 20 Rahr 12 ,000 60 30 Valley Fair 4 ,000 112 112 Apartments (3) 12 ,000 560 150 Comm. Projects (4 ) 6,000 50 40 Res. Remodel (75 ) 3 , 700 150 75 Houses ( 100) 25 , 100 500 250 Plan Review & Issue Permits 250 100 $124 , 800 2, 527 1 ,037 Office Time & Telephone 520 120 3 , 047 1 , 157 It is my opinion that the projections are on the light side. Even if I have projected slightly high, it is physically impossible to handle the work load by myself. It is by this memo I request serious consideration be given to allowing me to hire an inspector for the summer months . The above income projection (Bldg. , Plumbing , Sprinkler, Heating & Plan Review Fees) and work load , warrant it . 1,FH :pl.k MEMO TO : City Council and Mayor FROM: David A. Dacquisto RE: Recommended Improvements to City Hall DATE: April 12 , 1979 It is recommended to the City Council that changes be made to the office landscaping of City hall . This will be done to create an effective environment for work and to develop a more efficient use of the structure . The main thrust of the proposal calls for conversion to an open office concept with the removal of all non-bearing walls in the front office area . Presently located there , are the receptionist , Treasurer, and Assistant Treasurer. In place of permanent walls , movable partitions would be installed . This would create an attractive efficient use of space . By their impermanent nature it is possible to move the partitions as needs for office space and design change. Cost savings in the future will be realized through the use of movable partitions . As needs in the office change, design corrections may be made simply by changing the arrangement of partitions . The only cost incurred would be for labor and that would be minimal . With building and labor costs continuously rising, office alterations in the future would be prohibitively expensive. A second step would enlarge the lunchroom by moving the east wall 3 ft . This would provide enough room to place the refrigerator and coatrack in the lunchroom. The rear door would then be remodelled as an entrance . The hallway would be designed in a way that focused attention down the hall and to the reception area . DAD:nae r� y 33 r In J 0 n L I P