The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutJune 05, 1979 TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ .REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JUNE 5 , 1979 Mayor Ha�beck presiding 11 Roll Call at 5: 00 P.M. 2] Joint meeting with the Holmes Street Ad Hoc Committee 3] Adjourn. JUNE 5 , 1979 REGULAR SESSION 1] Roll Call and invocation at 7 : 35 P.M. 2] Approval of Minutes of May 15th, 1979 31 Communications : a] Minnesota Good Roads b] David McGuire c] 4] Liaison reports from Councilmembers : a] Cncl .Hullanderfrom the tShakopee Fire Department b] Cncl .Lebens from Commisio c] Cncl .Reinke from ShakopeCommbssiontandtJts Sevens Mann Committee d] Cncl .Ward from Planning e] Cncl .Leroux from Shakopee School Board f ] Mayor Harbeck from Scott County Board of Commissioners 51 RECOGNITION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANYONE PRESENT IN THE AUDIENCE WHO DESIRES TO SPEAK ON ANY ITE M 61 old Business : j public a] 79-3 Third Avenue Sanitary SeserNo. 1422 , Orldering Improvement hearing held May 22nd. . and Preparation of Plans 71 Planning Commission Recommendations : a] Request for a conditional use permit for a self-service gasoline station to be located East of Marschall Road extended and North of Hwy 101 on Lot 3, Block 1 , Halo 2nd Add'n. in a B-5 zone Applicant : Vickers-Minnesota Oil , 7645 Lyndale Ave . So. Action: Conditional Use Permit Res . No. CC-207 Planning Comm. Recommendation: Approval w/conditions b] Request for a 344 sq. ft. variance to permit the erection of an accessory building 8 Applicant : Scott Lucius , 528 East 1st Avenue Action: Variance Resolution No. CC-208 Planning Comm. Recommendation: Approval w/conditions c] Request for: a] 3' variance to e75ifootevar erection for a garage 27 feet from the street curb, sq. ft . garage Applicant : Keith D. Kraai , 969 Fuller Street Action: Variance Resolution No. CC-209 Planning Comm. Recommendation: Approval d] Request for conditional use permit for an outdoor building materials yard in a B-5 vert operations oe , to be located on Hwy 169, just North of Norther Applicant: St . Regis Papper Co. , P.O. Bo 26499, 3340 Republic Avenue , St. Louis Park, Action: Conditional Use Permit Res . No. CC-204 Planning Comm. Recommendation: Approval with conditions Tentative Agenda June 5 , 1979 Page -2- e ] Preliminary Plat of East View 1st Add'n. , 20 acres West of Nehl ' s Add'n. , So . of railroad tracks , and North of Shakopee Ave . (Drees property) Developer: Bill Chard, 104 Oakwood Drive , Belle Plain, 56011 Action: Approve/Deny Planning Comm. Recommendation: Approval w/conditions f ] Request by Robert Wolf that the cittheode be change tool to add to the Conditional Uses in a B- model making shop Applicant : Robert Wolf Action: Set public hearing Planning Comm. Recommendation: Approval 81 Routine Resolutions and Ordinances : a] Res . No . 1425 Ordering alley East of Avenues b] Res . No . 1426 , Setting A Hearing to Consider the Renewal of the On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License and the Sunday Intoxicating Liquor License for the Original Doc Holliday' s , Inc. 91 New Business : a] 8: 15 P .M. PUBLIC HEARING - 79-7 County Road 83 Sanitary Sewer and Watermain -- Res . No . 1427 , Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans b] 8: 30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Application for On Sale 3.2 Beer License for Valley Racquetball & Handball Club Inc . - June 5-30. c] 8: 35 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - 79-6 Valley Industrial Blvd. So. Roadway Construction and Storm Sewer Res . No . 1428, Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans d] 9:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Application by Paul Scherber for an On Sale and Off Sale Liquor License for House of Hoy, Inc. , 101 East 1st Avenue -- Preliminary Approval e] 9:05 P .M. PUBLIC HEARING - 79/80 Off Sale Liquor License Renewals f ] Mn. Restoration Site - request for loan & waiver of permit fees g] Scott/Carver Economic Council Inc . - Extension of lease & authorize improvements h] Recommendation of two physicians to serve as Deputy Health Officer i ] Proposed meeting with M. D. Ramsdell , MWCC j] Termination of probation period for Asst . Assessor k] Accept resignation of Assessor/Bldg. Insp. effective June 15th. 1 ] Commercial Revenue Bonds - K-Mart Store m] Authorize submission of a preapplication for 1980 LAWCON/LCMR Grant n] Discussion on holiday garbage service o] City Engineer status report on public improvements p] Discussion on amending City Code dealing with beer licenses issued on City owned land -- Ord. No. 22 q] 10:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Amending City Code dealing with on sale liquor licenses -- Ordinance No . 23 10] Consent Business : c 11] Other Business : L 121 Adjourn to Tuesday, June 19th at 7 : 30 P.M. Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator i I i TENTATIVE AGENDA Shakopee Housing & Redevelopment Authority June 6 , 1979 Regular Session Chrmn. Hullander presiding : 1) Roll call at 7 : 30 PM. 2) Approval of Minutes of May 1st and May 15 , 1979 . 3) Motion to Approve Payment of the Following Bills : 46 375 . a) Von Klug and Associates , Inc . - $1 , 2'26,15 b) Paul W. Wermerskirchen Abstract Co. , In- c) Capesius Agency, Inc . - $35 -00 4) Update on 1978 Community Development Block Grant Program. a) Initiation of Eminent Domain Proceedings . b) Alteration of Development Plans . 5) Update on Senior Citizen Apartment/Community Center Complex. 6) Other Business: a) Proposed Eagle Creek Townhouses . 7) Adjourn. James A. Dittrich Deputy Director PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY p Regular Session Shakopee , Minnesota May 1 , 1979 Chairman Hullanderkealand Lerouxepregent ,ordommatWard O M was absent . Comm. Lebens , Rein , Lebens/Leroux moved to approve the Minutes of April 3 , 1979 , as kept . Motion carried unanimously . Reinke/Leroux moved to authorize the payment of bills as presented . Inc . - $ 1 ,259 . a) Von Klu g & Associates , 46 :L09 .00 b) Paul W. Wermerskirchen Abstract Co . , Inc . - $ c) Payment for Property Owned by LeRoy Heitz and wife in Fourth and Minnesota Project Area - $ 4 d) Payment for Property Owned by John Theis and4ife in Fourth and Minnesota Project Area - $ e) Payment for Property Owned by Edward Rein and wife 7 ,000-00 in Fourth and Minnesota Project Area - $ Motion carried . Roll Call : Ayes - unanimous . Noes - none Mr . James Dittrich, Deputy Director , updated the Commission on the 1978 Community Development Program 1979 . ifsthististnotrthescase, the Ciptyfwill will be signed by May 31 , initiate eminent domain proceedings . tonpApril 26 , 1979 , thmoBtgagesfunder in the MFHA committed $320,0 its Public Priority Project pilot program. Hii presented� Council with a revised plan for the p p osedenor citizen ighrise which will include a senior citizen community center . The City Engineer discussed the possibility of a pedestrian crossing at First and Fuller for the senior citizens who will live in the senior citizen highrise . He reported that the State requires a minimum of 150 persons using the crosswalk per hour and the construc- tion of the crosswalk 120 feet from the closest driveway . The City will submit its application to the State Department of Transportation asking them approval of our request for a pedestrian crosswalk. The City Adm. discussed briefly with the Commission the arrangement of the tax increment finance project for the senior citizen highrise . Reinke/Lebens moved to adjourn at 7 :47 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. James Dittrich Deputy Director /lw PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Special Session Shakopee , Minnesota May 1.5 , 1979 with Comm. Hullander called the meeting to order Cat 7: 30 pMarrived Comm. Reinke , Lebens , and Leroux present . late . Leroux/Reinke moved to approve the Minutes of May 1 , 1979 , as kept . Motion carried uananimously . During property acquisition negotiations , an error was discovered in the calculated square footage of property in question was Fox and Ron Weiler. A review Patchin Appraisals , Inc. , and a performed by the appraisers , ft - revised appraisal amending the square .footage from 54 ,939 sq. at $0.35 per square foot to 75 ,169 sq ft . at $0. 35 per sq. with a new value of $26 ,309 was performed by the appraisers on March 20, 1979 . On May 15 , 1979 , the reviepmarketrvaluenoftthisrland. Res . 79-7 to be in accord with the f air is needed to correct the error. a Resolution Amending Reinke/Lebens offered Resolution NR 7ew raisers Report and Resolution No. 79-3 Accepting the Review App Establishing Just Compensation efor m Each Pro jest to be Acquired Through the 1978 Community Dev p adoption. The Deputy Director read the Resolution. Motion carried. Roll Call : Ayes - unanimous . Noes - none the The Deputy Director presented airough estiatefof the City sycost involved in the tax increment f projec highrise . Comm. Ward arrived at 7 : 35 PM and took his seat . Leroux/Reinke moved to direct the City staff to proceed with development of the tax increment project for the elderly highrise . Discussion followed . Motion carried unanimously- Leroux/Reinke moved to authorize the payment of bills as presented . a Payment of property owned by Harold Fox an and Weiler in the Y - Fourth and Minnesota Project area $265309 -00, b) Replacement Housing payment in ti-eform of ar Rental ssistancty in the Fourth and Minnesota project area $3 ,434.46 Payment to Donald and Ann Marie Jeurissen,- rsof . Motion carried . Roll Call : Ayes - unanimous . Noes - none x Page 2 Proceedings of the May 15 , 1.979 Shakopee Housing & RedeveLopmcnt Authority e De uty Director updated the Council on the 1978 Community Th p Development Prog ram . two The City Engineer rep�hecStatetDepartmenthof Transpordtation for alternative plans to hrise. the pedestrian crosswalk in connection with justificationlrep he The State DOT Engineers are composing aUeltoJthe location of for the need of a pedestrian crossing nature of persons residing in the high- highrise and the physical ossibilit that the rise . The DOT engineers have indicated a possibility roved mid-block crossing (between Atwood and Fuller) will be app by the State Highway Commissioner. Leroux/Lebens moved to adjourn at 7 : 55 PM. Motion carried unanimously - James Dittrich Deputy Director a MEMO TO: HRA Commissioners FROM: James A. Dittrich, Deputy Director RE: Initiation of Eminent Domain Proceeding DATE: May 30, 1979 Several property owners in the 4th and Minnesota Neighbor- hood Revitalization Project have een rdlbycaagt in accepting the City' s purchase offers as d et appraiser . Due to time restraints involved, it is ,therefore , recommended that eminent domain proceedings be initiated ty owners against these proper . This action is authorized by paragraph 51 subparagraph 5 of Resolution No . 79-3 which states : That the authority' s staff and its attorneys are hereby authorized to acquire the subject eprop by purchase ,donation, or proceedings in domain if necessary . Property owners involved are : a . Mr. and Mrs . James S. Manders b. Mr. George Ries C . Mr . Al Ryback d, Mr . George Castanguay These property owners h ave theevalueiofe their fproperty tde- offers by the HRA according to the e termined by a qualified app r . The City Attorney is presently preparing the necessary papers to commence the eminent domain proceedings and will pa obably file them on June 11 , 1979 with the District Court. P r JAD: lw r MEMO TO: HRA Commissioners FROM: James A. Dittrich Deputy Director RE: Alteration in Development Plans in the Fourth and Minnesota Project DATE: May 31 , 1979 ent meeting which included the City Administrator , iy A recrepresentative Engineer , City Attorney, contracted surveyor , and myself of the acquisition and relocation cons ultthe initiation of indicated that , due to time constraints ,torrencing problems associated eminent domain proceeding ro erties , acquisition of with the registering of acquired p P the arce d in the Fourth and Minnesota Asrojectareaacould P all not be accomplished until late this year . elopment plans the Fourth and Minnesota alteration in the dev, Project area was deemed to be necessary. A course of action discussed during this meeting in attempting to deal with the above mentioned problems included the platting to be p installation of public water and sewer services and platted of a section of the project area . Properties be include the Fox and Weiler property and part of the Sienaler Approximately five to six buildable lots will result property. from the platting . five At this time , plans include Mortgagesroft$40 ,000 eachoforlthese homes ifi the project area. Mortgages g the Minnesota homes will be part of the package already reserved by Finance and Housing Agency . Cit Engineer is presently developing specthe at.ons in order The y to advertise for bids for the installation of the wager and sewer lines . JAD/jiw A.CITY OF SHAHOPEI- 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee Minnesota 55379 MEMO TO: HRA Commissioners_- FROM: Director James A. Dittrich, De ut SUBJECT: Additional Surve j and Platting Work to be Conducted by Suburgan ng• DATE: June 15 1979 Several developments have necessitated than de Minnesota dproject area by and platting work to be conducted in the t Suburban Engineering- developments concerns the surveying of an additional 10. 5 One of these P reed to sell to the in to acquire this land so that an additional one foot strip west of the eekland Mr. & Mrs . John Thies aveB increasing the City . The City is seeking or two lots can be platted west of Minnesota Street Y ots added benefits can be achieved famiby homesnd moderate income number of 1 purchase single-family groups who will be able to p r Property and the Ryback property will likewise need to The Fox and Weiler Engineering . This property had been recently surveyed be surveyed by Suburba g t of the surveyed land. e or ' but State law requires that the surveyor who had by anotherCs,�theysurveying can sign off on the p actually will also produce the hardia�ll and reproducibles Suburban Engineering from the City Engineer' s manuscripts for the final P work and It is expected , at this time , that the additional surveying platting work will not exceed $3 , 500. s i ,.. ;,eeki n� zi[1 �iut h0 ri zat i_on f ritionalCsurvey Lworkoandtplatting City St ", � far add an agreeent with Suburban Engineering work. JAD:nae MEMO TO : Douglas S . Reeder , City Administrator FROM: James A . Dittrich , HRA Deputy Director RE: Proposed Eagle Creek Townhouses DATE : May 30 , 1979 Enclosed please note the proposal for housing assistance to be provided by the 1�sSundeP Department Section Housing program.UrThese Development for 43 un units are proposed to be constructed 200' southeast of the intersection of County The proposed 43 units include 23 two-bedroom units , 15 three-bedroom units and five four-bedroom units . Also enclosed are Tables 11-1 describing Housing Assistance Needs of Lower-Income Households outlining the Three Year g ears Year G 980. for the City of Shakopee applied for the y s Housing Both of these tables wwas submitdtedfrom in its 1978City ' Community Assistance Plan which Application. Development Block Grant App As indicated by Table 11-1. , 156 owner households (76 elderly and handicapped , 26 small families of 4 or less persons , and 54 large famielderlf and 145 renter households (53 Y family and 38 large family) are expected 56 unitsrofht are no subsidized assistance for the years housing currently under construction on Dakota Stree included in these figures . goals for Table III indicates that the City ' s three year housing assistance include 165 units for renters . Of these 165 rental units , 95 units (70 elderly and handicapped , 7 small family and 18 large family) are tof e provided under nwly newly constructed rental units - The g 7 osed senior constructed units will be nearly met by the prop citizen hi-rise . Douglas S . Reeder May 30 , 1979 Page -2- The Metropolitan Council ' s Definition of Municipalities Fair Share Allocation of Areawide Need For Low and Moderate Income Housing Opportunities indicates that Shakopee ' s areawide needs range between 360 to 900 housing units for the ten year period of 1980-1990. This includes subsidized housing rental units and assistance for new modest-cost housing units . Is 10 unit thelMetropolitanet Shakopee y Council . Other points concerning the proposed subsidized housing units which should be noted include the fact that 1!I three- bedroom units and five four-bedroom units are part of the proposal . This fact is important in meeting the needs of larger families . Also , the availability of mortgage money for the construction of rental units by the private sector should be kept in mind . Conversations with various apartment owners/managers within the City have indicated that their units are presently rented and vacancies are low. Each of the apartment owners/ managers contacted have indicated that the new proposal may have an effect on their apartment ranging from adverse re- percu$sions to an undeterminate effect . The City has the opportunity to comment to HUD on this proposal either favorably or unfavorably until June 11 , 1979 . JAD: lw Feaw1 Agroa+d amt w0.ssm 19" U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URtAN DEVELOPMENT 1. NAME OF APPLICANT COWAUNITY DEVELOPMENT III.=GRANT PROGRAM Cicy of Shakopee MOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMUR TABLE 11.1 — HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER-INCOME HOUS1EHOLDS B — 7 1 $ D IS 2 7 T 3. PERIOD OF APPLICASILITY w E. DATE OP SURVETISI USED CM ORIGINIAL Q RE V IEION.DATE FROM: 197$ TO: 1980 O AMENDMENT,DATE NUMtER OF HOU IMHOLDS ALL HOUSEHOLDS ALL MINORITY HOMHOLDS ALL FEMALE44UWED HOt! MOLDS ELDERLY SMALL LARGE ELDERLY SMALL LARGE EL WALY SMALL LAX" STATUS OF HOUSEHOLDS /1-2 (1-2 FAMHLY 11-2 FAWN" PAWLY FAMILY FAMILY � fAWLY REQUIRING ASSISTANCE Owes) /s r ff�► TOTAL Al N• (S r TOTAL Paartd W r !Sr TOTAL &W Am ataw ARNIM SOW AIW mum MANDI- I-raar� Oe asev "ANC/ Nash �� CHA 01101- /� Oaaaalat/ CAPPED CAPPED W Ito) (6-2) 1" (b-s) 1011 Ia-21 le Z♦ (9.4 1♦t1 I♦21 (Ng 46.0 I A. Total Owner Houmhoift 20 T 14 Ikon of Imm 2 and X 156 76 26 54 2 Owner Households to be D1ipi'w0 during*Is 1 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 O 0 0 three yew p.oRsn 3 Ownr Hem.haid 41 20 7 14 f d; t Perci Imp of Tow 49 %, 17 % 3 4 % by Household Type 100% 5 L Tod Flow Mwtahold I amn of lime 4 7 and V 145 1 53 54 1 36 0 0 0 o 39 ua 15 10 E Renta.HauaAoids m be Diaplaoad during*4 three y.r poops. 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 Renw Housshoid/ (-&W kW dapAw-0 66 53 10 3 0 1 - a 39 l 1 10 E Households Expected to Reside 78 / 35 0 9 Perorate of Tod by Hdunhoid Type 100% 37 % 37 % 26 % NARRATIVE [Attach addWowd&%wm it neesery) I. Data aoutvs and methad. 2. Special homing needs of Iowerina rae hwghalda. RaWmes Form MUO.70159,which is ODaoles Pte 1 of 2 Peon Hu0.7=18-78) aj C 1,Wen A06I4Iwtl y-yt A� UYY No MT N1�/l UOi UtrAN11.tN1 U/ 111II.;,IN/.. ANl/1.NYAN Dt Vt 4OYM1 N( �)� U��"P��a�p(]ee L-UMMLINII• /.tyt1l.YMlNI MIULG UNANI PNUt.NAn. -;♦A:P41GA�JTION/ONANT NU-MYkN I,UtjO1Nti Abilti(ANI:t Pt AN TAy/t I11 111Htt YkAH iIUUSING pN()GHAM B 7 8 ) 111Htt YEAH GUA4 rtluuu ur Arrucwaltll Y fit V. ♦ lx Dw1o1wA� .NUM 19 ti0 I u pulkic11. C7 1978 - u, i Ip�p - - - 1• 1ii h./' [� AMkwOMLNf.DAYS ��wcftw( t�pt11111 ►A&Qi br 11 lN/tw>+1+� ALL IAMIt r /ypkulgG T VPLfI AND WUif&:t6 Ut "OUIi1NU wsaw►aTAOIC� f/W1.Y Tr�E TOil1► N M JI/Y If�won all-- 70 16 22 32 1 1 A. 1u/.1 Gwp lu. Il.w•u.y ANUla/lca Jos; NwMOa1M/f' z ( Nrw GunNlu•UUn ANI/1a/11:a la fItMMYUMI.q 20 0 I (ruin of hors J a.1//4) - -1 - -- frJr.Nly Arru1r4P/uylaltM-` _ ♦ U111a1• - ---- oN./..l.J.la.u.l Arr.rlNKr 600►►urnauwMr. 50 16 1Etl 1 1 , 6 - -- Lwwu..o.,y urwlulurrnt Yluck Grease t•rllr.ruy ANnrrJ PIUy1WN �-�_.,.,_ � '` - 9 of total Goals foe 1/u..►.ny AIrHlarlca ItM Iio11Mt►rrrl il1Ml 23 3a 1L 46 x �� Pru.rl se,w of Iwwr/.uf.J ry/.a lU C Tull(ioal/Jos pal.•.wy Ar/Nta"O IW RMIM 16 I INn of 1.11Rr 11. 11 40.0.. .1 11 1 Nrw Nrm.1 uw.0 9 S Iru.n Illl.n.n Il a•ll 111 7 -1z 1r•Ir/.ny A►►.rIr.IPIUYIrw 10 14 ►lrl.llal.la•yn u/Nr/rt.l Ural• 0 0 0 Ip 4u,IN/wu.ly Ir.wl/lwrw►OWL If Ij_�tMMT x ir Ifi - - - (a.Mr dly ANIr►aY?/sfra/rrk 1) _ I11hr1• y IY t•.t1.1.Y IIv..1/1 UM/t 70 4 x — Iru.n ullulm IY.n//ll►I T - . _.._�r---�^ r .r.rl �1 U Tut.1 t..,.lr jut is....u/1y A"Mao .It"tuaipabv left PrlLrurr�Ir of Iluuwt.uW TrVa zz Total moils lo/IFOdsowr A..w"w.nW UWW by IOp� 4S 33 21 of►M.ura11WJ Trw NAHHADVE IA41dIA«A41100 AboonJim"" ryMw�11�� !J I r••wllwa talru w 1►lavid"hp"'AGO11 lot 1M MtlndkapPm • z Dow dw the ICI tY .it,sib Inlfid/wwW "609mv• �/ memo 7. r/C.GI Ilur /IIa,N 'N/I r1 OYL,YNMr Mi �� wl ~dw eudfh- � ! c►,tcll Is wrr►lcwk/l NNIM♦ES ip MVMiwA•r TATS HtHlM� , ,►wp.TYi�M»�. Nrwaces too-"t,u 1 /U1 tb Ia..ALdI M OwselsoN ' +k ,yEM� DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT °f MINNEAPOLIS AREA OFFICE 6400 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55435 RFMON V May 11, 1979 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1IDII MAY 1 4 �� of Mayor Walt Harbeck 129 E. 1st Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Mayor Harbeck: We have received the enclosed proposal involving housing assistance to be provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development _in your jurisdiction through the Section 8 program. Pursuant to Section 213(x) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, your unit of government has the opportunity to object to our approval of any proposal on the grounds that the proposal is inconsistent with your local housing assistance plan as approved by HUD for your jurisdiction. This is also your opportunity to endorse the project =if you wish. You are required to submit any objections based on the above grounds no later than 30 days after receiving this letter. if you do not intend to object, please notify us as soon as possible, to expedite our review pro- cess. if the project conforms to your IIAP but for any reason you do not recommend approval, please explain. We may receive more than one project proposal, for your community following an advertisement of fund availability. Your careful review and ranking of these proposals as they relate to your housing needs will assist )us incur selection process. Please notify us of any anticipated housir_o p which may have a higher priority than the project here submitted and ex- plain your criteria when ranking projects. Your comments are needed to select the best project for your community. Sincerely, Thomas T. Feeney Area Manager Enclosure Project No. MN46-0010-085 Y Form Approve OMB NO.6$-R0676 ,- U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FEDERAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION - PROJECT MORTGAGE INSURANCE Project Number: Project Name: Eagle Creek Townhouses proposed TO: Rnthschi ld Financial Cn�DOrotion and the FEDERAL HOUSING COMMISSIONER. The undersigned hereby requests a loan in the principal amount of $ 616.300 to be insured under the provisions of Section 221(d)(3)__.__ of the National Housing Act,said loan to be secured by a first mortgage on the property hereinafter described. nstuance of advances during construction ®is, ❑is not desired.❑Feasibility (Rehab.) ❑SAMA ❑CondiCtionall D Firm Type of Mortgagor: ❑PM [RLD ❑B-S ❑NP Permanent Mortgage Interest Rate 7-1 90• A. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: 6.State and ZIP Code 1.Street Nos. 2;Street 3.Municipality 4.Census Tract b.County 200' E 'nt s ction of Co.Rd. 17 8t 7.Type of reject: 8.No.Storie 9.Foundation: 9a.Basement Floor: ❑ Elevator ❑ Walkup Slab on Full Partial Crawl Structural Slab on [R Row(T.H.) ❑ Detached ❑ Semi-Detached 2 ® Grade ❑ Basement ❑ Bsmt. ❑ Space Slab ❑ Grade 10. 11.Number of Units 12.Number 13.List Accessory Buildings and Area 13a.List Recreation Facilities and Area of Buildings Proposed Revenue Non-Rev, ❑Existing 43 8 laundry building tot lot SITE INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION 14.Dimensions: 16.Yr.Built 16a. ❑Manufactured Housing ®Conventionally Built irregular ft.by ft.or 235 224 w.ft. proposed ❑Modules ❑Components 15.Zoning: recently changed,sll m t evi r 16b.Exterior Finish 17.Structural System 17a.Floor System systtem Heating- s R-3 wood siding wood frame joist 9� B. INFORMATION CONCERNING LAND OR PROPERTY: 19. 20. 21. 22.If Leasehold 23a. 23b. 24.Relationship-Business,Personal or Date Additional Costs Annual Ground Outstanding Other Between Seller and Buyer Acquired Purchase Price Paid or Accrued Rent Total Cost Balance - 2/8/`79 s72,000 $ 0 $ 0 s 72,000 $ 72,000 business 25.Utilities: Public Community Distance 26.Unusual Site Features: from Site Water ® ❑ 200 t ❑ Cuts ❑ Fills ❑ Rock Formations ❑ Erosion None Sewers IR ❑ at Site ❑ Poor Drainage ❑ High Water Table ❑ Retaining Wells ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ Off-Site Improvements C. ESTIMATE OF INCOME: Living Area Unit Rent Total Monthly Rent i i y 27.Number of Family Type Unit (Square Feet) Composition of Units Per Month for Unit Type Al lowanee- 23 896 2BR, LR, DA, Kit. , B 41 396 s 9,108 32 3 1 ,056 3BR, LR, DA, Kit, B - HC 460 s 1,380 34 12 1,036 313R, LR, DA, Kit, B 436 $ 5,242 34 5 1,282 4BR, LR, DA, Kit, 1-1/213 477 $ 2,385 36 s s 28. TOTAL ESTIMATED RENTALS FOR ALL FAMILY UNITS : 18,105 29.Number of Parking Spaces: Open Spacer 86 C i 0 per month ❑ Attended PS Self Park Covered Spaces a t per month 30.Commercial: Jry Area aro Ground Level 225 sq.ft., a s 5/du/MO per sq.•ft.lmonth 5 Other Levels sq.ft., a S per sq.ft./month 31. TOTAL ESTIMATED GROSS PROJECT INCOME AT 100%OCCUPANCY S 18 320 32. TOTAL ANNUAL RENT(Item 31 x 12 months) 1219, 33.Gross Floor Area: 34.Net Rentable Residential Area: 36.Net Rentable Commercial Area: 45,780 sq.ft. 42 618 w•ft. n• 36. NON-REVENUE PRODUCING SPACE Type of Employee No.Rooms Composition of Unit Location of Unit in Project D. EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES INCLUDED IN RENT: (Check Appropriate Items) 37. EQUIPMENT: 38.SERVICES: 39.SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: ❑ Heat [] Hot Water tt ❑ Prepayable Ranges(Gas ot1(c.) ❑ Dishwasher Non-Prepayable Elec.) ® Carpet LRUR GAS: ❑ Cooking ❑ Air Conditioning ❑ G( Refrig.( b. Principal pp Vp� t� Drapes rods only ELEC.: ❑ Heat ❑ Hot Water ($ Air Cond.(� tp.mr1Y)R Balance i { ❑ Swimming Pool C Cooking ❑ Air Conditioning JI Kitchen Exhaust Fan r,. Annual ( j Lights,etc.,in Unit X Laundry Facilities ❑ Tennis Court Payment$ Dispos.d ❑ Other(Seecify) OTHER FUEL: Heat ❑ Hot W ter WATER Wi OTHER sewer K trash d. Remaining i I removal -2- E. ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL EXPENSE: G. ESTIMATE OF REPLACEMENT COST: ADMINISTRATIVE: 36a. Unusual Land improvements $ 1. Advertising ,••, .,,,,..... $ 36b. Other Land Improvements...S 2. Management............. i 36c. Total Land improvements............. . t f3. Other .................. S STRUCTURES 4, TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE ,. .$ 37. Main Buildings.......•••• S QPERATING: 38. Accessory Buildings...... . $ b. Elevator Maintenance Expense$ 39. Garage•••••••••••••••• . $ 6. Fuel(Heating and Domestic 40. All Other Buildings...... . $ Hot Water•........ $ 41 TOTAL STRUCTURES...... $ 7. Lighting&Misc.,Power.. ,. $ 42, General Requirements.................. $ S. Water .................. $ FYES: 9. Gas ............... .... $ 48• Builder's General Overhead 10. Garbage& Trash Removal... $ &----%... ......... $ 11. Payroll ................. $ 44. Builder's Profit @ %.• $ -- 12. Other .................. $ 45. Architect's Fee-Design 13. TOTAL OPERATING .. ...... $ 4 %.•.,,,,,,.. $ -- MAINTENANCE: 46, Architect's Fee-Supervisory 14. Decorating.............. $ @ ------%........... $ 15. Repairs ................ S 47. Bond Premium........... $ --- 16. Exterminating ........... i 48. Other Fees............. . $ 17. Insurance............... ! 49. TOTAL FEES...............$ 18. Ground Expense.......... $ bo, TOTAL for All Improvements 19. Other.................. $ (Lines 36c+41+42+49)............. $ Y0• TOTAL MAINTENANCE......$ 51. Cost per Gross Square Foot............... $ 21. Replacement Reserve(0.0060 x Total for 62. Estimated Construction Time....•...•.•••. monk' Structures,Line 41)................... f . CARRYING CHARGES AND FINANCING: 24• TOTAL EXPENSE........... $ %53. Interest _months TAXES. on i ....... S - 23. Real Estate:Estimated Assessed $ 64. Taxes.................. _ Valuation$ @ $ bb. insurance............... i per$1000 i b6. FHA Mts.Ins.Pre.(0.6%).. t _ 24. Personal Property:Est.,Assessed 67. FHA Exam.Fee(O.g%)..... i ._ Valuation i @ 68. FHA iaspec.Fee(O.b%).... i i per$1000 $ 59. Financing Fee(_%)••••••$ 25. Employee Payroll Tax. „ ... $ 60. AMPO •••• ••..'. i 26. Other................... i 61. FNAdAIGNMA Fee(-%)- $ 27. Other .................. i ...... $ _ TOTAL TAXES ............ $ 62. Title and Recording 28• 63. TOTAL CARRYING CHARGES&FIN.... i I EGAL ORGANIZATION k AUDI'r FEE: 29. TOTAL EXPENSE AND TAXES ............. i _ 64. Legal.................. $ F. INCOME COMPUTATIONS: 65. OrgaMUSUOo............ 30. Estimated Project Gross Income 66. Cost Certification Audit Fee $ (Line C32,Page 1). .$ 67, TOTAL LEGAL,ORGANIZATION &AUDIT FEE $ % 68. Builder&Sponsor Profit and Risk.............$ 31. Occupancy(Entire Project).................. ...... $ 32. Effective Gross Income(Line 30 x Line 31)..... $ 69. Consultant Fee.•....•••••••• 33. Total Project Expenses(Line 29)........... i 70. Supplemental Management Fund.. $ �--- 34. Net Income to Project(Line 32-Line 33).... i 71. Contingency Reserve............I.......... $ % 72. TOTAL ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT COST 3b. Expense Ratio(Line 29 -by Line 32)....... (Excluding Land or Off-Site Cost) H. TOTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SETTLEMENT: (Lines 60+63+67+68+69+70+71).... $ 73. LAND(Estimated Market Price of Site) _ 1. DEVELOPMENT COSTS(Line 72)........•• $ &Q-ft.®i -per 2. LAND INDEBTEDNESS(Or Cash required 74, TOTAL ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COST OF for Land Acquisition).................. $ - PROJECT(Line 71+Line 72). ............ $ ------- 3. SUBTOTAL(Line 1+Line 2).............. i Source of h to meet Requirements Amount Cas 4. Mortgage Amount......1. $ 5. Fees Paid by Other than Cash $ $ 6. Line 4 plus Line 5 Subtotal.. .............. $ 7. CASH INVESTMENT REQUIRED $ (Line 3-Line 6)..................... $ 8. INITIAL OPERATING DEFICIT .......... $ $ 9. ANTICIPATED DISCOUNT............... $ 10. Working Capital(2%of Mortgage Amount).... $ $ 11. Off-Site Construction Costs..... ........... $ 12. TOTAL ESTIMATED CASH REQUIREMENT $ (Lines 7+8+9+ 10+ 11)............... $ TOTAL $ C � 3- A>,4ES DRESSES AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS OF THE FOLLOWING: 1.SP N _. O*(S): N . ddress and ZIP Code: 12.CONTRACTOR: Name,Address and ZIP Code • Eagle Creek Partnership to be determined c% Louis R. Lundgren Lundgren Associates Hamm Bldg. , Lower Concourse L— St. Paul, MN 55102 L Telephone Number: (612) 244-4765 Telephone Number: Name,Address and ZIP Code: 3.SPONSOR'S ATTORNEY: Name,Address and ZIP Code: la. James B. Druck 8� Associates, P.A. L. A. Spitzack 1709 Cargill Bldg. 627 - 17th St. S.E. 110 South 7th Owatonna, MN 55060 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (507) 451 -3710 (612) 339-7665 Telephone Number: Telephone Number: 1b. Name,Address and ZIP Code: 4.ARCHITECT. Name,Address and ZIP Code: F Lundgren Associates Hamm Bldg. , Lower Concourse St. Paul, MN 55102 L— L_ Telephone Number: (612) 224-47'55 Telephone Number: J. CERTIFICATION : The undersigned,as the principal sponsor of the proposed mortgagor,certifies that he is familiar with the provisions of the Regula- tions of the Federal Housing Commissioner under the above identified Section of the National Housing thereof that to the pre of bigte to knowledge and belief the mortgagor has complied,or will be able to comply,with all insurance of the mortgage under such section. The undersigned fyrther certifies that to the best of his knowledge and belief no information or data contained herein or in the ex- in any way flse or incorrect and that they are truly descriptive of the project or prop erty which hibits or attachments listed herein are mortgagee d that the proposed construion will not violate zoingordinances o eestrictions� intended as the security for the P r of record. The undersigned agrees with the Federal Housing Administration that pursuant to the requirements of the FHA Regulations,(a) neither he nor anyone authorized to act for him will decline to sell,rent or otherwise make available any of the property or housing in the multifamily project to a prospective purchaser or tenant because of his race,color,religion or national origin; (b)he the requirements with federal,state and local laws and ordinances prohibiting discrimination;and (c)his failure or refusal to comply �1 of either (a)or (b)shall be proper basis for the Commissioner to reject requests for future business with the sponsor identified or to take any other corrective action he may deem necessary. Apri 1 30, 1979 Sign ' ( ponso Date: r> Louis R Lundgren n in neral Partner REQUEST FOR COMMITMENT: O Conditional O Firm TO: FEDERAL HOUSING COMMISSIONER: Pursuant to the provisions of the Section the the eofa Comm�menteto insure the foregoing mortgagee covering the property delcribed above. a It able thereto, request is hereby ma f p� After examination of the application and the proposed security, the undersigned considers h ch will bear interest at and is interested ill making a loan in the principal amount of $ months according to amortization plan agreed upon. require repayment of principal over a period of Insurance of advances during construction O is, O is not desired. is subject to adjustment so that the total will It is understood that the financing expense, in the amount of$ not exceed _ %of the amount of your commitment. $ , which is in payment of the application:fee required by FHA Regu- Herewith is check for lotions. Signed: (Proposed Mortpiee) Address of Mortgagee: FOR FHA USE ONLY Date Received Amount Code Schedule EE Received By f: O Library 0 Grocery store © Drug store: 4 5 O Bank Clothing store 1 � � 23 LYMAN�BLVD. _ q'CFr _-_•]19_x__ _- Shakopee Medical Center I BLVD. VU i 24 ` � �7¢f, i - Q Minnesota Valley Mall with LAKE o� A grocery shore, drug store, I c several clothing stores and a ASSEN ; 1 pTONpE% % wide variety of other shops. -- I EY D° CBp Central business district with �o o bank, library, drug store and s H ST.W. 8 J a wide range of shops and 'A I - - busi nesses. 101 I o E o Z— E- C� ----- 3. 9s t — - --26— c0 :W Ro. NO. tt — SA•— --- I E% d EDEN P;R� -- - -—— 4TH ST.` QU- 169 c�ouD°%'� 101-- �— I o_ h' AKOTA L L.A. 112 Y - I I ,.•TA w.4 0 „ .•' � GRAS „[ RICE , G9 ,yo 1 DICE , I --�--36-- --- 110{--------�---- --- � � • — 35— 112 �?' i 169 Ro I 1 I 101 � N � Y � SHAKOPE $ 101 , TNO`' a Z •[ `G 1 Y• ' smi ► o ° s � • � i I I R 169 2 �o , I ' SH KOPE § H - s I ` Z Y - AK s 1 TM AYL. • • u TM � r I — 'A , , ,, Y-f M �tT N� i � arc•= 1 _ I .R c �. Q ► ! i Z O ii 1 t LrrT�.Yt 1200 d EE &AP154 Ai v OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA MAY 15 , 1979 Mayor Harbeck called the meeting to order at 8 : 00 P .M. with Cncl . Leroux, Lebens , Reinke , Hullander, and Ward present . Hullander/Reinke moved to approve the Minutes of May 1 , 1979 , and May 2 , 1979 , as kept . Motion carried unanimously . Ward/Reinke offered Resolution No . 1416 , A Resolution of Appreciation to the Shakopee Police Department , and moved its adoption. The City Adm. read the Resolution . Motion carried unanimously. Hullander/Leroux offered Resolution No . 1415 , A Resolution of Appreciation to Mr . John DuBois , and moved its adoption . Mayor Harbeck read the Resolution. Motion carried unanimously . A framed copy of the Resolu- tion was presented to Mr. DuBois . Ward/Leroux offered Resolution No . 1417 , A Resolution Appointing the Chief of Police , and moved its adoption. The City Adm. read the Reso- lution . Roll Call : Ayes - unanimous . Noes - none . Motion carried . The City Adm. reviewed a letter received from the National League of Cities inviting the City of Shakopee to join the League . Hullander/Reinke moved to table action on the letter until May 22 , 1979 . Motion carried unanimously . A letter from the City of Roseau was reviewed concerning flood plain revisions and notice of a meeting on June 12 to discuss mutual City problems . The Shakopee Chamber of Commerce sent a letter to the Council recommend- ing the withdrawal of Doc Holliday ' s liquor license . Discussion followed. Hullander/Leroux moved that the City staff notify Doc Holliday ' s that the City will not renew its liquor license on June 30 ,1979 , and direct the City staff to draft a proposed liquor license ordinance that will require 50% of its income to be derived from food, in any establishment with over a specified number of square feet . Motion carried with Cncl . Leroux voting "no" . Lebens/Hullander offered Conditional Use Permit No. CC- 206, Billiard Parlor in B-Ozone, Jim Sheehan, and moved its adoption. 'The City Adm. read the Conditional Use Permit . Mayor Harbeck asked for comments from the audience concerning the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit . Dr. Muralt , representing the Shakopee Chamber of Commerce , stated that the Commerce prefers commercial enterprises along 1st Avenue . Mr . Reuben Ruehle , Ruehle Jewelry, stated that he thought the concept of a billiard parlor was a good idea , but that the proposed location was not . Mr. Dan Stiefel , First National Bank of Shakopee , stated that he was opposed to the proposed location of the billiard parlor. Mr . Earl Fleck, Shakopee Juvenile Officer , stated that a previous billiard parlor owner in Shakopee had run into considerable problems operating a billiard parlor on lst Avenue . Upon motion from the Chair , shall Conditional Use Permit No . CC- 206 now pass? Motion failed unanimously. Leroux/Ward moved to open the public hearing amending the land use regulations in a R- 3B zone . Motion carried unanimously. The City Adm. explained the proposed Ordinance . There were no comments from the audience . d Proceedings of the City Council Page -2- May 15 , 1979 Leroux/Ward moved to close the public hearing . Motion carried unanimously. Hullander/Lebens offered Ordinance No . 21 , An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee , Minnesota, Amending Shakopee City Code Chapter 11 Entitled "Land Use Regulations" (Zoning) By Adding to the Permit Uses in Section 11 . 27 as Hereinafter Set Out and By Adopting by Reference Shakopee City Code , Chapter 11 and Section 11 . 99 , and moved its adoption . The City Adm. read the Ordinance . Roll Call : Ayes - unanimous . Noes - none . Motion carried. The City Adm. reminded the Council of the Annual Association of Metro- politan Municipalities meeting on May 24 and the State League Convention on June 13 , 14 , and 1S . Cncl . Hullander reported that he has received five or six calls in the last week concerning the general housekeeping around the City and requested that a press release be submitted relating to storage of cars , housekeeping , etc . Cncl . Hullander reminded the City Adm. of the termination of the notice for removal of the mobile homes at Malkerson Motors . Cncl . Reinke reported on the items which were discussed at the recent Utilities Commission meeting. Cncl . Leroux inquired as to what can be done for better traffic control exiting Valley Fair . The City Eng . will investigate the matter. Mayor Harbeck recognized anyone in the audience who wished -to speak on any item not on the agenda . There was no response . Leroux/Hullander moved to remove the request of Robert Koch for realign- ment of the alley behind his home from the table . Motion carried unanimously. Mr . and Mrs . Robert Koch were present and explained the alley situation to the Council . Ward/Leroux moved to direct the City Eng. to prepare a feasible report on what it will take to repair the alley problem. Motion carried unanimously. Ward/Reinke moved to remove the request of Robert Polk for a 4-way stop sign at Market and Shakopee Avenue from the table . Motion carried unanimously. Ward/Lebens moved to deny the request for a 4-way stop sign at Market and Shakopee Avenue . Motion carried unanimously. The City Adm. explained to the Council the new method for determining liquor license fees which will involve basing the fee on physical size . Mr. Tony Strupeck of the Shakopee House was present and stated that he was opposed to the large increase in his liquor license fee , stating that he does not think it is fair for smaller sized establishments who gross more to pay a smaller liquor license fee . Mr. Dave Riegger Rock Spring , suggested increasing Shakopee liquor licenses in accordance with other neighboring cities . Mr . Dick Hanover , Richard' s Pub , stated that he feels he is being penalized because he does not serve food and objected to the increase of his liquor license fee . Hullander/Ward offered Resolution No . 1400 , A Resolution Fixing the License Fees for the Sale of Beer, Liquor , Wine , Setup Licenses , Liquor Licenses , Club Licenses , and Temporary Beer Licenses as Provided by Section 5 . 06 of the Shakopee City Code , and moved its adoption. The City Adm. read the Resolution. Roll Call : Ayes - unanimous . Noes - none . Motion carried. r: 5i Proceedings of the City Council � . Page -3- May 15 , 1979 Ward/Leroux moved for a five minute recess at 10: 05 P .M. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Reinke moved to reconvene at 10 : 15 P .M. Motion carried unanimously. Ward/Reinke offered Resolution No . 1410 , A Resolution Receivin Report and Calling a Hearing on an Improvement , Valley Industrial Boulevard South from County Road 83 to Toro , and moved its adoption. Mr. Dan Johnson, Suburban Engineering , explained the proposed improve- ment project to the Council . The City Adm. read the Resolution. Motion carried unanimously. Hullander/Leroux offered Resolution No . 1411 , A Resolution Declaring the Adequacy of a Petition and Ordering the Preparation of a Report 79-5 (Valley Industrial Park 5th Addition) , and moved its adoption. The City Adm. read the Resolution. Motion carried with Cncl . Lebens voting "No" . Ward/Leroux offered Resolution No . 1413 , A Resolution Receiving a Report and Calling a Hearin on Tm rovement 79-7 , CR-83 Watermain & Sanitary Sewer, and moved its adoptpion. Mr. Dan Johnson explained the proposed improvement project and costs . The City Adm. read the Resolution. Motion carried with Cncl . Lebens voting "No" . Ward/Hullander moved to grant the preliminary approval of the prelia p,,ary plat of Century Plaza Square 1st Addition with changes as ,indicate4 . by the City Adm., which :include :changjng. the' plat to n plat and the conditions of the'Planning Commission which' vere: -1) r&V0rabJf. Title Opipion of the_ City Attorney; 'Z) 'Acceptable' Developers "A re��iatp be executed including the construction of Gorman Street and needed utilities; 3) Park dedication be in cash; 4) Location of proposed watermain now shown in the Utility Commission property be moved to current alignment of Gorman Street; 5) Ten foot utility and drainage easements be shown on ali lot lines . Motion carried unanimously. The Council reviewed the final plat of Minnesota Valley 3rd Addition and agreed to take action on May 22 , 1979 . Hullander/Ward offered Conditional Use Permit No. CC-202, two family, . dwelling in an R-1 Zone, Killarney Hills Addition, requested by Robert Sweeney and John Vohnoutka, and moved its adoption. The City Adm. read the Resolution. Roll Call: Ayes - Ward and Lebens Noes Leroux, Hullander, Reinke, Harbeck Ur-'t ior tai2ed. .. , ,. ...... _.___..._... ....,.....:.t........fs._...,...a.. .c<. — —� _.:..a.•.4•.4M igyi, '►�'f,', '..A'.W�l`i '�b' `,a`` r.,cvMawL ''Fy Ward/Lebens ..moved tQ adjourn no layer than 12 : O0 midnight, lion r 0.F carried unanimously, ,r Hullander/Leroux moved to rename County Road 83 to Duffy Road. Motion carried unanimously. Hullander/Leroux moved to accept the 1978 Annual Report of the Planni#$ � Commission as presented. Motion carried unanimously. Harbeck/Reinke moved to table Ordinance No. 20 . Motion carried .unani- mously. Ward/Leroux moved to table Resolution No . 1408 . Motion carried unanimously. Ward/Reinke offered Resolution No . 1409 , A Resolution Ordering Prepara- tion of a Report on An Improvement , 12th Avenue Sidewalks , and moved its adoption. The City Adm. read the Resolution. Motion carried unanimously. Proceedings of the City Council Page -4- May 15, 1979 Cncl . Hullander reported that he and the City Adm. m-. t with the_ Scott County Historical Society and discussed their fire protection of the restoration site . The Society is in the process of preparing its report . The City Adm. presented the proposed contract with K-Mart for the Council ' s perusal . Reinke/Ward offered Resolution No . 1414 , A Resolution Determining the Necessity for and Authorizing the Acquisition of Certain Property By Proceedingsin Eminent Domain, and moved its adoption. The City Adm. read the Resolution . Roll Call : Ayes - unanimous . Noes - none . Motion carried . Reinke/Leroux moved to authorize the hiring of Howard Clarence Staska as a temporary part-time Building Inspector at an hourly . salary of $6 .00. Roll Call : Ayes - Ward, Leroux, Hullander, Reinke , Harbeck Noes - Lebens Motion carried. The City Eng. reported that the Holmes Street Ad Hoc Committee requested a joint meeting with the Council to discuss alternatives in establishing assessment policies for the Holmes Street project . Reinke/Leroux moved to authorize the payment of bills as presented. Roll Call : Ayes - unanimous . Noes - none . Motion carried . Ward/Reinke moved to concur with the Finance Director ' s recommendation to negate the interfund transfer of $28,833 . 88 dated September 1 , 1978 . Roll Call : Ayes - unanimous . Noes - none . Motion carried. The City Eng . reported on the status of the current public improvement projects . Ward/Reinke moved to authorize the alteration in the Capital budget to purchase a two-way radio , scanner , and drafting equipment for the Engineering Department instead of the nuclear density machine . Roll Call : Ayes - unanimous . Noes - none . Motion carried. The City Attorney informed the Council that the Order was issued for the condemnation of the extension of the road through the Sludge Farm. Reinke/Leroux moved to adjourn at 11 : 57 P .M. to Tuesday, May 22, 1979 , at 5 : 00 P .M. Motion carried unanimously. Douglas S . Reeder City Administrator MINNCE OTA 3 GOOD 3402 UNIVERSITY N(NUE, S.E. ROADS MINKMOLIS 55414 J6Q) 379,,7227 APR1q ,. _ OFFICERS Rb�'F,�T M. JOHNSON 'LARRY SCHAUB April 16, 1979 Executive Director President `�°�� Morri CITY P OF s s F 'PAUL C.HEDBERGrs ,� .� Vice President Blue Earth 'JOHN R.BORCHERT Vice President Eagan 'WARRENS WOODRICH Dear City Official : Vice President Hopkins *VERNON KORZENDORFER Secretary Do you know that every time there has Detroit Lakes *ROBERTF PUERINGER been an increase in your MSA allotment due to Treasurer Minneapolis an increase from gas tax or license fees , ONE BOARD OF DIRECTORS organization has been the principal push behind RAYMOND ANDERSEN Bloomington that effort? *DELBERTF.ANDERSON Starbuck 'NORMAN E.AROUETTE Minnetonka Yes , we' re referring to Minnesota Good JOHN BAILEY,JR. Minneapolis Roads , Inc. , and we urge your city to join. The L.R.BARTLEY Saint Paul fee is nominal and the benefits have been great. WILLIAM J.BENJAMIN,JR. Minneapolis WILLIAM H.BLATTNER,JR. Avon Right now M.G .R. I . is promoting a concept MARVIN F.BORGELT Inver Grove Heights of inflation-proofing the highway user contribu- EUGENE L.CANNON St.Cloud tion. The idea is to tie the gas tax to the cost GEORGE DAHLVANG Minneapolis price index, thereby insuring an increase in high- PHILIP S.DUFF,JR. Red Wing way funds over the next few years . A P EBERL Minneapolis LITTON E S.FIELD St.Paul Enclosed is a paper explaining the concept 'ASH FISHER Minneapolis and indicating the amount your municipality would RAY FOSLID Shakopee receive over the next few vears if this concept is WILLIAM H.GARY Saint Paul adopted by the Legislature. *ROLLIN B.GLEWWE South St.Paul DAN GUSTAFSON Minneapolis We again urge you to join this worthwhile 'JOHN V.HOENE g g y West St Paul organization, but we also urge you to become in- LEW HUDSON Worthington volved in securing adequate funding or our streets 'HERBERT O.KLOSSNER g Y g Hopkins and highways . Senator DELORES KNAAK White Bear Lake 'WILLIAM KONIARSKI Belle Plaine Sincerely, JOHN A.KUETHER Milaca KENNETH B.LAW Hastings DR.SIDNEY M.LEAHY Saint Paul VERNON J.MAAS Canby CHARLES A. SIGGERUD MARLOW V. PRIEBE 'ROBERT J.McFARLIN Minneapolis EDWARD J.MORRISON Director of Public Works Director of Public Works Morris City f Burnsville City of Hutchinson THOMAS D.O'FALLON y y Hill City L M.G. R. I. Director President, City .P.PEDERSON St Louis Park JERRY PETERMEIER g En ineers Association Grand Rapids 'E.J.RENIER �7, / r Minneapolis I DONALD W.RICHARDS Moorhead WAYNE RISER Morris A.LLOYD SHANNON Duluth CHARLES A.SIGGERUD Burnsville CHARLES J.SWANSON Stillwater JACK SWOFFORD Golden Valley ` RICHARD VAN KREV ELEN /0 C7U North LV•Mankato �Y/��r — CHRIS VAN LITH Minneapolis N.TED WALDOR Saint Paul JERRY WEYRENS St.Cloud 'Executive Committee "THE CITIZEN l I /' ,(') VOIC(" Minnesota Department of Transportation j April 11 1979 THE CONSL''.IER PRICE INDEXED FUEL TAX The Need for Stable IIighway Revenues Four levels of government (state, county, city and township) are directly re- sponsible for the,maintenance and improvement of roads in Minnesota. Road user revenues, including motor fuel taxes and vehicle registration fees, are split be- tween the state (620) , the counties (290) and municipalities (9%) . For all levels, the real costs to maintain current highway programs are growing much faster than revenues from current sources. Since 1967,. highway construction costs have risen 120% while highway revenues, including Federal aid, have risen only 84%. In 1978, construction cost rose 21% over 1977. As the buying power of the highway dollar decreases, increased emphasis has been placed on maintenance. Unless actions are taken, Minnesota's road systems may be facing the same problem that our rail branch lines are facing -- deteriorating conditions, lower maintenance levels, still poorer conditions. What Needs To Be Done A highway user fee should be instituted which will better keep pace with in- flation but will not accelerate inflation. A fine balance must be established between insuring that adequate highway user fees are available and fueling inflation through increased driving costs. The im- pact on Minnesota's economy and employment must be considered. Minnesota business and industry are dependent on a good transportation system. Also, about 7,400 Min- nesotans are directly employed in the highway construction field with salaries totalling over ;130 million per year. A reduction in the actual level of highway construction, caused by a 21° increase in construction costs, could have a signif- icant impact oil employr..ent not only in the field of construction, but in related in- dustries as well. The Consumer Price Indexed (CPI) Fuel Tax Proposal The CPI, developed by the U.S. Department of Labor, is a statistical measure of , the average change in prices for a fixed "market basket" of goods and services. The CPI is prepared for 28 different rietropoli.tan areas throughout the United States. It is proposed that the CPI for the Twin Cities metropolitan area be used for index- ing fuel taxes in the State of Minnesota. The CPI fuel tax should be adjusted on an annual. basis and be based upon changes in the CPI during a preceding 12 month period. The per gallon tax on fuel should be adjusted to the nearest tenth of a cent. For administrative simplicity, the fuel tax should be applied only at the wholesale level as it is today. A floor of 9 cents per g ' established. All Clian es iii the `a l u 1 �S.,d11Vlt �iIUliIU bL CStaulished. g �e-. CcTttS per gallon �c«: jiiviliu be cal- culated using a base rate per gallon of 9 cents. The initial tax adjustment should take place on June 1, 1979 and be based on the changes in the CPI from January 1_978 to February 1979. After the initial adjustment, all subsequent fuel tax adjustments should be implemented on June 1 and be based on the change in the CFI during the previous February to February period. As an example, an increase of 1.0 percent in the CPI would result in a 10 percent increase in the motor fuel tax. Analysis indicates that trends in highway construction costs closely parallel changes in the CPI as shown on the next page. Linking the motor fuel tax to the CPI instead of directly to the highway construction cost. index has the advantage of pro- viding a more stable revenue source, without the cyclical and sometimes sudden fluc- tuations which occur in construction costs. Since increases in construction costs would not bring automatic increases in revenue, an incentive would be provided to i t , �01 the construction industry not to exceed the general rate of-inflation. HISTORICAL TRENDS TWIN CITY CONSUMER PRICE INDEX AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX FOR MINNESOTA ' 250 ZOO --------------- --- . 150 ------------------ -- 1 TWIN CITY CONSUMER PRICE lNDEX�fYa i MINNESOTA HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION INDEX Bose Year 1967=100 50 --------- --------- 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 An additional advantage .of the CPI motor fuel tax is that it would be essentially "self-policing" because a CPI motor fuel tax is not likely to result in windfall reve- nues. CPI revenues would tend to increase during times of inflation and remain stable or decrease during deflationary periods, therefore, additional controls in the form of tax rate ceilings or other constraints should not be needed. Since the CPI fuel tax would only keep pace with the general rate of inflation and not exceed it, such a tax should not significantly increase inflationary pressures. It is proposed that the CPI fuel tax be implemented effective June 1, 1979 with a tax rate adjustment based on changes in the CPI between January 1978 and February 1979. The actual change in the CPI between January 1978 and February 1979 is 11.20. A 11.2% increase in the CPI would result in a tax of 10.0 cents per gallon on June 1, 1979. Under this alternative, the estimated additional revenue during the 1980-81. biennium would total $19.7 million to the State, $18.7 million to the Counties and $5.7 million to the Cities. Estimated additional revenues for FY 1981-85, based upon a projected 7% annual increase in the CPI and a 2% annual increase in fuel con- sumption, are presented below. CONSTMER PRICE INMEX FUEL TAX REVENUES (Above current revenues in millions) FY 1980 FY 1981 FY 1982 FY 1983 FY 1984 FY 1985 Cents per gallon 10.0 10.7 11.5¢ 12.3¢ 13. 1.E 14.0¢ State $14.6 $25.1 $36.8 $49.7 $64. 1 $80.0 County 6.9 11.8 17.3 23.4 30.2 37.6 City 2.1 3.6 5.3 7.2 9.3 11.6 The CPI Fuel Tax Proposal will accomplish two very important objectives: - provide $63.8 million in additional funds during FY 1980-81 to cities, municipalities and the State to offset a portion of the additional costs caused by increased highway con- struction cost, and establish a mechanism which will help highway revenues keep pace with highway costs and improve the effectiveness of all levels of government to deliver projects which have under- gone extensive 4-6 year planning and preliminary design periods. The attached appendix presents a detailed breakdown of the additional. revenues which would accrue to each of the states, counties and municipalities during FY 1980-85 as a result of the CPI fuel tax. All calculations are based on 1979 CSAH and MSAS ap- portionment factors. Distribution of the CSAI1 and MSAS funds among the counties and municipalities may change as factors in the apportionment formula change. CONSUMER PRICE _INDEXED FUEL TAX PROJECTED ADDITIONAL COUNTY REVENUES (thousands of dollars) FY1.979 FY1960 FY1981. FY1982 FY1983 FY1984 FY1.785 8 .3 141 .3 07.0 280.0 361 .3- 450.6 A] Tt I N 0 ) 2 ANOKA 0 . 0 69.8 119.8 175.6 237.5 306.4 382. 1 BE'Ch:ER 0.0 76.3 131 .0 192.0 259.7 335.0 417.9 BCLTRAMI 0.0 99. 1 170.2 249.4 337+'3 ' 435.2 542.7 BEN'TON 04-0 47.3 811 . 1 118.9 160.8 207.5 258.8 BIG STONE. 0.0 40.3 69.2 1.01 .4 137 .2 177 .4 '220.8 B1 Li E. EAR TI-1 0.0 106- :) 1 X32.0 26 6<.6 360.ci 465.3 580.3 BROWN 0.0 67.5 1154.8 169.7 229.5 296. 1 369.3 CARLTON 0.0 63.7 109.5 160.4 216.9 279.9 349.0 CARVER 0.0 65.4 112.3 164.5 222.5 287. 1 358. 1 CASS 0.0 103.0 176.8 259.0 350.4 452. 1 563.8 CHIF'1'E1tlfa ?. 0 cf•q,q 9) 135.8 183. 7 237.0 295.6 CHISAGO 0.0 56. 1 96.4 141 .4 191 .0 246.4 307.3 CLAY 0.0 84.6' 145.3 212.9 2038,0 371 .5 463.4 CLEARWATER 0. 0 55.2 94.8 138.9 187.9' 243.5 302.4 COOK 4.0 44.4 76.2 111 .6 151 .0 194.8 243.0 COTTONWOOD 0.0 55.0 94.4 138.2 1 X37.4 241 .3 344.9 CROW WING 0.0 86.5 148.5 217.6 294.3 379.7 473.5 DAKOTA 4.0 106. 1 182.2 267.0 361 . 1 465.9 58111 DODGE 0.0 56.7 97.4 142.7 193. 1 . 249. 1 31.0.7 DOUGLAS 0.0 66.8 114.6 168.0 227.2 293. 1 365.6 FAIF:I,AULT 0. 0 73.6 126.4 185.2 :.'50. 6 323.3 403.2 FILL? Or:L 0.0 117. 202. 5 2 .7 401 .3 51-7.8 -11>15- 3 _ FRECEDOM 0.0 78.6 134.9 197.•7 267.4 345.0 430.3 GOODHUE 0.0 84.6 . 145.2 212.7 287.7 371 .2 . 463.0 GRANT 0.0 40.3 69.2 101 .4 137.2 177.0 220.8 HENNEF'IN 010 443.3 761 . 1 . 1115. 1 1508.3 1946.0 2427.0 HOUSTON 0. 0 68.8 118.2 173. 1 ' 234 .2 -302.2 376.9 HUBBARD 01.0 55.4 95.2 139.4 i88.6 243.4 303.5 ISANTI. 0.0 44.2 76.0 111 .3 150.5 194..2 242.2 1".TASC:A 0.0 138.x; 237.x; 348 4 47J. 60E3 .0 7.58..' iAC:t:SOt! 0.0 75. 1 `:?. 6 J. 9 . 9 2::;6,.9 1z`�1 .4 41.3.3 KANABEC 0.0 47. 51 . 1. 118 . 9 160.;3 207.5 '58.8 3 Ki'-1d:C�:I:YC3H J: 0 +0 r?. 14 ': :' :'08.4 ?81. . 9 3153.7 -4'15 + I KITTSON 0.0 4;5.9 11 . '. 1,.'i.9 4.4 2(09 .5 361 . 1. KOi:)C:1.1IC1-11.1`G 0.0 75.::1 1.2g _ `; 1X9.9 M6.9 331 .4 4:13.3 v FY1979 FY ` 98O F.Y1981 F'Y' 982 FY1983 FY1984 FY1 ' 85 ^ LACEQUI PARLE 010 62^4 107, 1 156 ,9 212^2 273^8 ' 1 5 "" 0^O 60^5 103^9 [ ;2. 2 2O5 9 2 65 7 a , ^ LAKE OF WOODS 0^0 51 ^4 88^3 129^4 175^ 1 225^9 331 ^4 ^ ^ ^ 281 ^7 LENSUEUR 0^0 65^2 111 ^9 164^0 221 8 �86,2 356 9 ' L 1Oc uux 0^ 0 46 ^ 7 80 . 2 117^5 158 , 9 ^O5. 1 255 ^8 - . .` 0.0 61 ,4 105^4 154 ^5 209^0 69, 6 336.2 MAHNOMEN 0^O 4O,3 69^2 1O1 .4 1.37.2 177 O 22O ! MHkSHALL 0^0 94 ^3 161 . 9 237 3 32O ^9 414 ^ ^U MARTIN ^ ^ ^ ^ 1 516 4 0^O 82^8 142+2 20k81+4 28| � '- ' ^ ^ "� ^y J63^7 453^6 MC L OD MEEKcR 0^0 48^0 82^4 12O.8 163^4 ' 210^8 262+9 MILLc LACS O°O 47^ 7 82^0 120, 1 162.4 2O9~6 261 ^4 ' � 0^0 48^7 83^6 122^5 165,7 213^8 266 ^7 MORRISON O,O 69^6 119 ^ 5 175^O 236 , 8 3O5^ 5 3O1 O ."°cx O^O 82^ 1 141 ^O 2O6 5 279 3 360 4 449 ^ MURRAY O^O 57^ 1 � 98^O 143^6 194 ^2 250^6 312 ^5 NICOLLET 0, 0 51 ^6 88^ 6 | 29^8 175 5 226 � 282 5 NOBLES - ^ ^a , O^0 67,6 116 1 17O O 23O 3 - ^~� " NORMAN � ^ ^ ^ » �'6 ^7 37O 1 N. O^0 72^7 124^8 182^8 24 ; ^3 319^ 1 397 ^9 OLMSTED . OTTER TAIL 0^0 87"O 149^4 218^9 296^ 1 382^ 1 476,5 0^0 161 ^ 9 278,0 407.3 55O,9 710^8 886^5 PENNINGTON �^O 5O 3 86 3 126 3 171 ' PINE ^ ^ ^ ^ 1 2�0^7 275 3 pIpESTO�E O,O p6,5 1.65,7 242,8 -~3 ^4 �23^ 7 528°4 0^0 42^6 73~ 1 1O7^ 1 144^ 9 .87,0 233^2 POLK POPE 0^0 143^8 246^9 361 ,7 489^2 631 ^2 787 2 RAMSEy 0^0 46^9 �80^6 118^0 159^6 206^0 256 ^9 0^0 194^0 333^2 488^2 660^ 3 851 ^ 9 1O62 ^5 ` RED LAKE 040 40^3 2 101 ^4 137 2 ' 177 O 220.8 REDWOOD O^O 72,4 124 ^3 182^ 1 246 ^4 317 ^ 9 396^4 ' xEMYiLLE O^O 86^8 149^O 218^2 295 ^2 38O ^9 475.~O RICE ROCK 0^0 57^4 98^6 144*^5 1'95^4 252^ 1 314 ROSEAU O^O 45^4 78^O 114^2 154^5 199^3 24` 6 0^0 78^0 133,9 196, 1 265^ 3 342^3 42"^9 ST LOUIS 0^0 399^2 685^5 OO4^3 1358 4 1752 7 2186 O SCOTT O^O � 66^9 ! 14^ 9 168^3 227 ^ 7 293 ^7 ' 366 ^3 � SHERBURNE O^O 40^3 -69^2 1O1 ^4 137^2 ^ 1 `7^0 ,2O^8 ' SIBLEY O^O 56^7 97 ^3 142^6 192 8 248 8 31O 3 5TEARNS O^O 118^6 203^ 7 298, 4 403^7 520^8 649 ^5 0 ^0 58 ^ 3 1OO^1 146^ 7 198 � 4 256 `O 319^3 STEVENS SWIFT �^O 40^7 69^ 8 1O2^3 138^ 4 178^ 5 222^ 7 TODD O ^0 54 ^3 93^ 3 136^7 184 ^9 238 ~5 297^5 O ^ O 74 ^ 5 128 ^ 0 187 - 5 253^6 327^2 4O8 ^ 1 TR�VERSE O°O 42^O iO5^8 143 O 184 6 23� 2 ' WABASHA 0^0 82 ^ 0 .14O^8 20k,') 279^ 1 36O ^ 1 44u^ 1 ' . CONSUMER PRICE INDEXED FUEL TAX PROJECTED ADDITIONAL, CITY REVENUES (thousands of dollars) FY1979' FY1980 FY:1.981 FY1982 rata- 8m- FY1 , u i FY1.98�4 FY19,.,J ALBERT LEA 0+{,' 1.4.6 2 + 1 36.8 49.8 64.2 _-_ 80. 1 ALEXANDRIA ANDOVER 0.0 6.8 11 . 7 17.2 23.2 . 30.0 ANDOVER 37.4 0.G 914 16+ 1 23.5 31 .8 41 . 1 51 .2 ANOh:A 0.0 10. 1 17.4 25.5 34.4 44.4 5 .4 APPLE VALLEY 0.0 14.2 24.4 35.8 48+4 4 62,.rz f1TiEt•! HILLS 0. 0 71.8 A 5. 1 8+7 12.7 17+2, 2 `' 27..7 AUSTIN C,+r`,' 16+3 28+0 rc BEMIDJI 41 + 1 JJ.J 71 + .,' t;9. �} U.0 10.9 18.7 27+5 37. 1 41. f' BLAINE 0.0 15+7 27.0 39+6 53+5 69.C> 86+ 1 BLOOMINGTON . 0.0 61 .2 105.2 154. 1 208.4 268a9 335.4 BRAINERLi 0.0 14.5 24.9 36:5 19. 4 63+7 79.5 BROOKLYN CENTER 0 ; 27.0 46 67+9 9 r, t'•4 . .!. <. r 11846 - 147. 9 BROOKLYN PARK 0.0 24+6 42 a BURNSVILLE 61 .9 83.7 108.0 134. 7 0` �' 1.1- •3 57.2 83.8 113.4 146.3 182.4 CHAMP1_IN {?+0 6.7 11 . 5 16+0 22+7 29.3 36.5 CHANHASSEN 0.r} C 1-4 A S I. �'� 0.0 4.:_ 7. 1 10.5 14.2 18+3 6.6 11. . , 16.5 22 2 3,J. . CHISH0LM ••3 8.43 r� 0 O.0 : .4 9.3 13+ 7 18.5 .8 23 29.7 CL11011E7 0+ 0 18.2 3i + COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 0+0 11.9 4�.8 61 .9 :'9+ ' 99+6 ='w?. 1 3�.3 43+ 7 5t COON RAPIDS r 0 �) • 70.4 {�+'J 22 0 Z� rc r_ • yr .9 JJ+5 7"J' .) 9t a J 120.7 7 COTTAGE GROVE A:;. {., 22.5 38.7 56.7 CROOKS T Oi`�# t., a l 99+0 123.4 0.0 10.3 17.7 25.9 :?;;, :l. 45+2 CRYSTAL 0.0 1.9+ X37.0 108 8 34.0 49.9 67+;; 08.6 .5 DETROIT LAKES 0. 0 5.9 1011 14.8 20+0 25.9 32.3 DULUTH 0.0 104.0 178.7 261 +8 . 3,"i•fL . 1. 456.9 569+8 EAtTAN .0 0 . 22+5 38+ 7 56.7 98+; 123,4 EAST BETHEL 0+0 7+ 1 12.2 17.9 24 .2 EAST GRAND FORKS 0. 0 r- -, 31 .3 39.0 J+ 9.8 1.4.4 1.9, ..:} :'i=-. 1. 31 +2 EDEN PRAIRIE 0.0 20+ 1. 34 +6 JO+;- 64366 83a °; 110.3 Eli INA _ 0.0 ;:9. 7 68. 1 �> , yy 174 +2 t� ff�� 1 9 7 +v 1..J'J a U 21-1. 3 LL..h RIVER � 0.0 1.4�oi3 112.6 2� .? �Xd r? c r; EL.Y �� .�. ,tea.., 47.,., )9. 3 0.0 w�.4 9.3 13.6 18.4 23.7 29+15 E:.VEL7H 01 0 '1. 7 c 9 �. _ 4+ d 1.9+ .., ?..,. 2 31. .4 FF'tIR°fnh!T 0.0 10+3 1.7. 26. •� x F��LCni�! f-IE]:GI_I3�8 �_ {} 3J. 1 4J+::S ,.,u +.., 0+0 3. :1. 5+4 7.9 1.0.6 13. 7 17. 1 i O'EEE C '0r� t>'60Z, 90T ' T 0°0 JNIOIG3W M0113A Z*Ezg 9*6TV T *rZF- tr'0trz T 't,9T S S6 0'0 lHOMM L`E8b 8`!82 9'00£ z zZ-Cly L.` TST 2"88 0`0 VNt?NIM 6 * V67 tr'9T.z z 4 EST S'SET 9 4 IL6 6'2S 0 4 0 HIIA-iIM E'9 TE • 9°ESs. 9`96T E.9t7 T '66 8'LS 040 NVMNOI.VM L 'Z.9v 0°/-9z tt`V8f, z°0Tc:. S'ztlT 9428 0' 0 NOIONif-IaVM 8'6%,E S' V9Z 0'S O i: S° T 9 T t r E01 t'4 09 0°0 V J3SVM t_4 T EZ 8°S8T 0' t7v T V*90T r ' .L z'zfy 0�0 t,��°d:1�IVM 9.86'fAA tx86TAJ F.86TAA Z 6T kA T^6'GAA 0 6TA.-1 (SZ_6T),.J ti ' FY1979 FY1980 FY1981 FY1982 FY1983 FYI-984 FY1985 FARIBULT O^O 11 ^9 2O^4 29 ^8 4O ^4 52 ^ 1 65^ 0 FER8US FALLS 0,0 9^3 1660 233,4 31 ^ 6 40^8 5O^ 9 FSIDLEY _ O^O 17 , 7 30,4 44 .5 6O^2 77^7 96^9 _ GOLDEN VALLEY 0.0 23^5 40^4 59.2 8O, 1 103.3 128,8 GRAND RAPIDS 0^0 6.2 10^6 15,6 21 ^ 1 27^2 33^9 ' HAM LAKE O^O 6^0 10^2 15°O 2O^3 26°2 32^6 ' . HASTINGS 0^0 , 9^6 16^ 5 24^2 32^7 42,2 52.7 HERMANTOWN 0^0 12,8 22^O 32^3 43^6 56,3 70,2 HIBBING O^0 11 ^2 19^3 28^3 38,3 61 ^6 HOPKINS O^O 11 ~0 18^9 27,7 37~5 48,4 60,4 HUTCHNISON 0^ 0 6~2 10^6 15^5 21 ,0 27, 1 33,8 INTERN/FALLS O^O 4^4 7 ^5 11 .,O 14^9 19^2 23.9 INVER GR/HEIGHTS O^O 10^5 18^ 0 26.3 35 ^6 46^0 ' 57 ^3 LAKE ELMO O^O 2~9 4 ,� 7^ 2 9^7 12~5 15^6 LAKEVILLE 0^0 15^4 26^5 38,8 52^5 67^8 84 ^5 LITCHFIELD / 0^0 5^2 9^0 13, 1 17^8 22^9 28^6 LITTLE CANADA 0^0 4 ^7 8^0 11 ^7 15^8 20^4 25^5 LITTLE FALLS ' O.O 7^3 12,5 18^3 24,8 32^0 39~9 LUVERNE O , O 2,6 4 ^5 6.6 8^9 11 ^4 _ 14^3 O O 24 1 4". . -1 6O 8 82 MANKATO ^ ^ O 105^8 132^0 ^ ^ MAPLE GROVE 0^0 21 ,3 36,5 53^5 72,4 93,4 116.4 ' MAPLE WOOD 0,0 26,9 46^2 67^7 91 ,6 118,2 147^4 MARSHALL ' 0.0 8.2 14+ 1 20 7 28 0 36^ 1 45^0 � ^ MENDOTA HEIGHTS 0^O 9^3 16^0 23^4 31 ,7 40^9 51 ,0 MINNEAPOLIS 0,0 356 ^ 1 611 ^7 8�6 ^0 1212^ 1 1563^9 1950^4 MINNETONKA O^O 37^ 1 63^8 93^5 126^4 163^ 1 203^4 O O 5 9 10 2 14 9 2O 2 26^O 32^5 MONTEVIDEO ^ , , , , _ MOOR HEAD ^ ^ ^ ^EAD 0^O 25^9 44 ^4 65^ 1 88^0 113^5 141 ^6 0+0 5 8 1O O 14 6 19,7 25^5 31 ^8 MOUND � O^0 8^ 3 14^3 2O,9 28^3 36^5 45^5 O O 7 2 12 4 18 1 24 5 31 ,6 39^�� MOUNDS VIEW ^ ^ , , , NEW BRIGHTON 0^0 12~7 21 ,8 31 .9 43^ 1 55 ^ 6 69.4 NEW HOPE O^O .13^ 2 22^6 33^ 1 44 ^8 57^ 8 72, 1 � NEW ULM O^O 11 ~7 20, 1 29^5 39^8 51 ^4 64 ^ 1 NORTHFIELD O,O 8^ 9 15,3 22.5 30^4 39^2 48^9 NORTH MANKATO 0.0 6,3 10^8 15,8 21 ^3 27^5 34^3 NORTH ST. PAUL O~O 7^9 13^5 19^8 26.8 34^6 43^2 OAKDALE O^O 9^2 15^8 23,2 31 °3 4O ^4 5O^4 OROHO 0^0 24 ^3 31 ^4 39 ^ 1 ^ �WATONNA 000 14 ^3 24 ,6 36°0 48^7 62.9 78^4 ~ O 0 6 6 11 3 16 6 22^4 28^9 36 ^ 1 PIPE STON ^ ^ ,E , PLYMOUTH O^O 20^0 88 ^ O 1O9^7 PRIOR LAKE O^O 8. 1 13~8 20°3 27^4 35, 4 44^ 1 � , . . 'FY1979 FY1980 FY1981_ FY1982 FY1983 01984 FY '985 RAMSEY ' RED WING O^O 8^5 14~6 21 ^5 29^0 37^4 46 . 7 O~0 14~3 24,5 ' 35^9 48^6 62,7 78 ^2 RICHFIELD 0^0 24^6 42^3 62,0 83^9 108.2 135.0 .~""^"Sun LE 0.0 10,4 17^ 9 26^2 35^4 45^7 57^O ROCHESTER O°O 39,6 67^9 99^5 134^6 173^7 216 ^6 ROSEVILLEO,O _ 25^7 44^ 1 64,6 87^4 112~8 14O 7 ~ . , ANTHONY , 0^0 6^0 10^4 15^2 20°6 26.6 33^ 1 ~ . ^ "L"uu 040 48^8 83,8 122^7 166^0 214 ^2 267^2 ST, LOUIS PARK O^O 3 5^4 60^8 89. 1 12O^5 155 5 1 �3 9 ~ ' ^ '"»L PARK ' � 0^O 269^9 463^6 679,2 918^8 1185^4 14r8^4 ~ . ^ PAUL 0^0 4^7 8^ 1 11 .8 16.0 2O ^6 / ^ ^ ^ 25.7 ST PETER 0.0 SAUK RAPIDS O^O 6^ 1 1015 15^4 20, 9 26,9 � 33,6 ' SHAKOPEE 0O 6^2 1O^6 15^5 21 ^0 27, 1 33,8 ^ �, 1 13^9 20^ 4 _ 27^6 35.7 44.5 SHOREVIEW SOUTF| ST pAUL 0^O 7^3 12~5 18^3 24 ^7 31' , 9 ' 39.8 SPRING LAKE pARK 0^0 15^5 26^ 7 39^ 1 52.9 68^3 85^ 1 . 0,0 4,4 7^6 11 ,2 15^ 1 15 24 ^3 STILLWATER 00 10^2 17^4 25^6 34^6 44,6 i5 6 . .^^. "^, FALLS V.0 7^6 13^ 1 19,2 26*0 33 5 ~ ^ . 'VIRGINIA O^O 9^7' 16^7 24^5 33,^ 1 42^~7 41 ^8 53^3 WASECA � WEST ST PAUL 0^0 4 ^3 7^4 10^9 14.7 191,0 8123.7 WHITE BEAR LAKE 0^0 14^8 25^4 37^2 5O`4 65^ 81 ^O ^ 0,0 18,9 32^5 47+6 64^'4 83^" ^ , l 103°7 �WILLMAR �WINNON� O^O 14^5 24^9 36^5 49~3 63~ 6 7�� 3 WOODBURy D^O 19^ 1 32,7 48^ O 64 . 9 83 ~ 7 104~4 0^0 11 ^ 9 20^4 29^9 40~5 52^2 65^ 1 WORTHINGTON 0^ 0 7+9 13 6 2 ' ' ^ � ^ 0,O �7.O 34^9 43.5 ' ' ' ' | | i MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator RE: Request to Begin Condemnation Proceedings DATE: May 31 , 1979 The attached request to have the City of Shakopee begin condemna- tion proceedings is the apparent result of the failure of negotiations between the developer and a private land owner to purchase the needed land. This plat (Sandlewood 1st) needs the connection of the road between the road in Prior Lake and the end of the plat in order to insure good emergen, access to both residential areas . As you are aware , I am not a proponent on 22 acre subdivisions in this area of the City; however, if we continue to allow 22 acre plots , this plot certainly meets all reasonable requirements and it is reasonable to have the City condemn the needed property for the street connection. If the City does agree to proceed with condemnation, it should be under the terms of a written agreement between the City and the developer that all costs connected with the condemnation will be paid by the developer and that the developer will continue to try to reach a negotiated settlement even while the condemnation is proceeding. Without this road connection, I would recommend denial of the plat or a complete redrawing of the plat . DSR/jsc l.it .:c;l,..i rlisir<�tor 11 Y CY afik'OPE-E lal_�pee, c:"4 .11ear Thi..s litter concerns our negotiations vlitli Dun .er for the desired road easeu:ent ,,.ece :sary to co-Inect Sa ldlewood arith Martindale Drive. Our efforts to purchase this easerrier '. for a rosasor alrl e a-0, justifiable price have not been successful. It i,ould be our desire to appear ir. frog t of the Slal.opee Council on flay 2c?, 1 �'Ju. At this 'ti>re lve ll ask that corlder„natior. proceedings are t,eeun r_;, the cit,, to ohtai-U right-of-way for the road. Sincerely, ?, J a �f David C. McGuire DUvl/c, 5IVED MAY 2 3 1979 CITY OF SHAKOPEE 3c.. J'AURPHY'S LANDING a Minnesota Valley Restoration of IE340 -IBSO Box 275 Shakopee, Minnesota, 55379 Margaret MacFarlane Executive Director May 31, 1979 Mr. Douglas S. Reeder,City Administrator City of Shakopee �otA rAlssr Nssro� 129 East First Avenue Shakopee,Minnesota 55379 -° Dear Mr. Reeder: As the Minnesota Valley Restoration Project is a non-profit educational *-'C41 •1 NY1R0• corporation, may I respectfully request a waiver of the local building, park fees and penalty fees for the structures involved in the HUD grant. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely, Margaret Ma arlane Director MM/rlm RECE100 .,:� MAY 3 1 1979 CITY OF SHAKO EE MEMO TO : Douglas S . Reeder City Administrator FROM: H . R. Spurrier City Engineer RE: Third Avenue Watermain DATE : June 5 , 1979 I have analyzed the existing distribution in the vicinity of Shakopee Friendship Manor, approximately 200 feet east of Third and Adams and at Fourth and Adams . On June 1 , 1979 , flow tests were conducted in order to determine the amount of water available in the areas noted above. Fire hydrants were tested at Fourth and Adams , approximately 200 feet east of Adams and at Third and Harrison. The purpose of these flow tests was to determine the maximum and minimum amount of water available for fire flow under actual field conditions, then using theoretical computation determine the amount of water available under adverse conditions . The table below indicates the fire flow required at each location, the maximum flow available under ideal conditions and the minimum flow available under adverse conditions during peak use in the summer. e TABLE I Available Fire Flow Required Maximum Minimum Location Fire Flow Fire Flow Fire Flow 3rd & Harrison 1 ,000 gpm 1043 595 3rd & Adams 1 ,500 gpm 680 388 4th & Adams 1 ,500 gpm 714 200 As the table above indicates, there is inadequate supply for fire protection as recommended by Insurance Service Office in all but one case and that is for 3rd and Harrison under ideal conditions. Another point of concern was the problem of line damage in the event a pumper truck connected to the watermain. Present practice of the Shakopee Fire Department is to use "soft" suction hose . By using "soft" suction hose the possibility of creating a vacuum in the pipe line is reduced and if only 2� suction is used, there would not be enough water drawn to create damaging conditions. Due to the present practice of the Fire Department , this problem will not occur. MEMO TO: Shakopee Planning Commission FROM: David A. Dacquisto RE: Vickers-Minnesota Oil DATE: May 21 , 1979 Request : The applicant , Wickers-Minnesota Oil , requests a Conditional Use Permit for a self-service gasoline station. Location: The property is located North of Highway 101 and East of Marschall Road extended on Lot 3 , Block 1 , proposed Halo 2nd Addition. Analysis : The proposed site is zoned B-5, General Business District . The area is Commercial in nature, with Perkins being built to the west , . A & W and Shakopee Ford to the south and its situation on Highway 101 the main commercial strip for Shakopee . To the east of the lot is an existing, trailer park. The proposal would be in line with plans for development of the Highway 101 Highway Business District. Recommendation : Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for a self-service gasoline station. As the station would abut property residential in use an opaque 6 ft . fence is recommended as stated in City Code Section 11 :05 , Subd. 1 .B . R DAD/jiw MEMO TO: Shakopee Planning Commission FROM: David A. Dacquisto Assistant Zoning Administrator RE: Scott Steven Lucius Variance Request DATE: May 21 , 1979 Request : The applicant, Scott Lucius , is requesting a 344 sq. ft. variance toallow him to build an accessory buildin of 994 sq. ft. (650 sq. ft. is the present maximum. Location: The property is located at 528 East First Avenue. Analysis : Mr. Lucius proposed to construct a new 28' x 35 ' 6" garage on his property. The garage would be 994 sq. ft . It is a three stall garage which opens onto the alley. All the proper setback requirements have been met including 20 ft. setback from the alley. The lot is 60' x 142 ' for a total of 8520 sq. ft . No accessory building may exceed 10% of the lot area. A maximum allowable Variance. for this property would be 200 sq. ft . allowing the construction of an 850 sq. ft . building, rather than the 994 sq. ft. building proposed. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends disapproval of Variance request based on the fact the proposed accessory building would cover more than 10% of the lot area. Staff further recommends approval of a 200 sq. ft . variance to allow the construction of an 850 sq. ft.' accessory building. DAD/jiw MEMO TO: Shakopee Planning Commission FROM: David A. Dacquisto Assistant Zoning Administrator RE: Keith D. Kraai Variance Request DATE: May 21 , 1979 Request : The applicant , Keith D. Kraai , requests a 3 foot variance from the Shakopee City Code to permit the erection of a garage 27 ft . from the street curb rather than 30 ft • as required. Applicant also seeks a 75 sq. ft. variance to allow him to build a garage building of 725 sq. ft . Location: The property is located at 969 Fuller St . at the corner of Fuller and 10th. Analysis : Mr. Kraai proposes to construct a 725 sq. ft. garage 27 ft . from the curb. This requires' a size variance of 75 sq. ft. and a setback variance of 3 ft. The setback variance would line the garage with the house and the lot and with homes and garages along 10th Avenue, making the request appropriate. The increase in size of garage would be within allowable limits on the lot and would not harm or hinder the neighborhood. The garage would open onto 10th Avenue. Presently there are a number of garages which open onto 10th Avenue. While front street access would be preferred, this would not be a basis for turning down the request. Recommendation: Staff recommends appFQv41 of `both size and setback variance requests . DAD/jiw t MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dave Dacquisto Asistant Zoning Administrator RE : St . Regis Paper Company Requesting Conditional Use Permit DATE : April 19 , 1979 I wish to revise my recommendation to you in the memo of April 12 , 1979 . Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of the St . Regis Paper request for a Conditional Use Permit . This is conditioned upon St. Regis Paper Co . agreeing to meet the following stipulations : 1 . St . Regis Paper Co. must refrain from storing creosote-coated materials on the property covered by the Conditional Use Permit . 2 . There must be maintained a 30 foot side and rear lot setback to be used as a fire lane.,/v6 7Wi IW(ew fwo /) NON 1=L�vm�Abc e SvRFioc e 0" 774tJ MXP.O 3 . Fire lanes of 12 feet in width must be maintained between stacks of stored materials . 4. Stacks must not exceed 16 feet in height . 7"lePuA L !i PIyPw p DAD/jiw MEMO 7 TO: City Council FROM: David A Dacquisto , Ass ' t . Zoning Administrator RE: Alternative Road Alignments for East-View DATE: June 1 , 1979 A number of alternatives have been suggested for the road alignment for East-View. These were all discussed at the May 24, 1979 meeting of the Planning Commission. The following is an analysis of the road alignment options : Alternative 1 : This alignment suffers from two factors , each of which prohibit this choice . First , there would be only one access to the area . No road alignment which provided only one access to the area would be acceptable . For fire control two access roads are required for an area . Secondly, the access road would cross railroad right-of-way and we could not secure a crossing at this time . Also , abandonment of the rail line is not a certainty at this time . Alternative 2 : This is basically alternative one except two access roads are provided. Again, we would not , at this time , be able to secure crossing through the rail right-of-way. Secondly , we would have to cross land the City requires for expan9fon of City facilities . Thirdly, we would be requiring the developer to cross land to Gorman over which he has no control . Locking him into this alignment would make his position in negotiating for the land untenable . Alternative 3 : This alignment requires a connection to a private road owned by Mr . Wiggins . The private road is smaller than normal City streets . In any case , it would not be advisable to rely on crossing private property for access to the development . Secondly, this alignment would provide a through street from 7th through the development and out on County Road 17 . This would create more traffic for the neighborhood than the proposed alignment . By creating a through street , people would drive down 7th and 8th and through the development as a short-cut to County Road 17 . Alternative 4: This is similar to alternative 3 , however, it uses railway right-of-way to build a road connection out to County Road 17 . Again, unacceptable traffic flows would be channeled through the 7th and 8th Avenue neighborhoods . The problem of railway right-of-way also enters into this proposal . We are not certain, at this time , when the railway right-of-way will be available to us . City Council -2- June 1 , 1979 7-2-- Alternative 5 : This alternative has two access roads exiting on Shakopee Avenue . The two roads would not be acceptable because of the grade involved . Cars would have problems with it in winter and would not have adequate visibility for entering Shakopee Avenue . It would not be acceptable to have two roads which would run into B .F. Pearson School , as these would . The speed at which cars would be entering Shakopee Avenue and the lack of visibility could result in tragic accidents in front of the school . Alternative 6 : This alternative provides a through street from 7th Avenue on to Shakopee Avenue . Eighth Avenue would be made into a cul-de-sac in the development . Again, there is the unacceptable grade and visibility to Shakopee Avenue . The cul-de-sac is far longer than we would allow. Long cul-de-sacs cause for too many maintenance problems . There would also be the problem of 7th Avenue traffic passing through the development to Shakopee Avenue , increasing neighbor- hood traffic flows . Recommendation: Having looked at the alternatives , and having reached agreement with the people of the neighborhood, we have concluded the proposed alignment is the best possible for the neighborhood. It provides the best alignment for the new development and provides the least automobile impact on the neighborhood . DAD:nae ALT& RAI qT/ Ut 1 p s c r 0 v n A QC C„ 4 Q 7TH g rN n 0 k q CANOL� LvYCK fNq k olose 'f 2 t 0 v ^1 M 7TH gTN Q ti O Y 4 GANOLI wtCK fNq K o PF[ i r 0 1 Q �o K ,47 O a .4 7TH gTN r r H d Y Q Q �A�vDt�w1'CK 1Nq KOTit r N { z a 0 V h 1 A ` s - N q 0 7TH 5 t Q H 4 at Q C-ANOtiwttK 4 fHA k oP�E �r xly r Ct 0 v h 1 /cl of V Q -7TH �rN 0 4 CK SKA is o PFD co .� x r 0 v n Q 4C C4~1 u $'N a A, �r U 7 T►f g rN Q v ti Q FANOL6 fHAKooff MEMO TO: Doug Reeder City Administrator FROM: David A. Dacquisto Assistant Zoning Administrator RE : East View 1st Addition DATE: May 31 , 1979 With regards to the East View Plat submitted by Bill Chard, the Planning Commission dealt with the issue of road placement at their May 24, 1979 , meeting . At this meeting, the Planning Commission considered for 22 hours the question of how best to situate the roads . Concerned citizens from the affected area were present to voice their concern. All comments from the citizens present were taken under careful consideration. They voiced their opinions on various alternative road alignments . Each alternative was dealt with at length. The merits of the alternatives were discussed and the problems with them brought to light . In the final analysis , it was decided by all present ; Planning Commission members , staff and citizens , that the proposal submitted was the best possible alternative with the least impact on the neighborhood of all alternatives suggested . People of the neighborhood present at this meeting left satisfied that the Planning Commission' s decision to approve the plat as submitted was best for everyone . DAD/jiw May 22 , 1979 Mr . Douglas Reeder City Administrator Shakopee City Hall Shakopee , Mn. 55379 Dear Mr . Reeder : We would like to request the city of Shakopee to consider amending the City Code , Chapter II - Land Use Regulations - Section 11 . 32 to add the conditional uses in a B-5 General Business District the use of a tool and die model making shop . We are trying to get our business going in an existing building. This building on First street has just the right amount of square footage and is presently used as a mill-work shop . Mr . Fetzer wants to sell and we want to buy it . We plan to upgrade the building with a new roof and to upgrade the parking lot adjacent to the building. We are using a computerized machine for the model making and would be happy to demonstrate it for council members . This is a new field and could make a difference in your thinking. Please consider it.. We sincerely thank you for your time . A MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Douglas S . Reeder City Administrator RE: Historical Site Water System and Waiver of the Building Permit Fee DATE: May 31 , 1979 The Minnesota Restoration Site has requested that the City of Shakopee do two things : A. Waive the Building Permit fee , the penalty fee and the park fee for the construction of apart- ments at the restoration site . B. Grant a loan to the Restoration site to allow the construction of a well and installation of a pump and standby generator to provide fire protec- tion. A. Building Permit Waiver: The Council has the authority to waive the local fees on the Building permit , but not the State charge and the MWCC charge . It is recommended that the Council waive the local charges which amount to $ 1 , 371 .00. B. Loan: In order to provide an adequate water supply to these buildings in the historical site , the City has been insisting on some type of new system. The Historical site people have now come up with a system which the City Engineer can accept , however, they lack the funds to construct it . They are requesting that the City and the County each loan 1/2 of the cost (estimated at $32 ,000.00) and that they repay the money with no interest when they can. It is my recommendation that we agree to this only with the following conditions : 1 . The City Attorney issues an opinion which states that it is e legal public purpose. 2 . That an agreement is entered into with the following minimum requirements . a. ) Repayment in five years from the date of occupacy or less from the; first source available including a pledge of 25%, of the rent receipts for this purpose. b. ) Agreement that grants will be sought for the purpose of repaying these funds and that q high priority be given to thf s lase of any grant 'received. DSR: lw a CITY OF SHAKOPEE INGOR100RAT90 ti170 129 E First Ave., ShakuNee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445-3650 May 31 , 1979 Ms . Margar('t McFarlailt't Miunf,sk>ta Val ley Resturatioll Highway 101 Shakopee. , MN 55379 Dear Ms . McFarlane : At a mk,eting attended by Mayor Walt Harbeck , Dennis Hron, Douglas Rccder , Jim Digovanni , H. R . Spurrier , Ken Platt and yourself. , specific requirements for a fire system were discussed . It was agreed by the City and those in attendance that the fire system would consist of the following: 1 . 1vuU g . p .m. well with electric three-phase pump capable of pumping at a rate of 1000 9 .p •m- 2 . 1'he well located in such a manner that it would be accessable to a fire truck. 3 . pump being capable of operating from a mechanical or electric standby auxillary power system. it is further understood that this system satisfies the fire flow requirements of the City of Shakopee provided future develop- closer ment does not place any larger buildings or buildings any than existing buildings including the proposed apartment units . I must reemphasize that should any larger factlLty be c onstructedontheMinnesotaValleyRestorationsite , here would be a possibility that the above described fire system would not satisfy fire flow requirements . Sincerely , H. R. Sp rier , Y . E. City Engi er IiRS/ jiw cc : Mayor Walt Harbeck Dennis Hron Douglas Reeder W"1;1A'IC_, J290 CHAPTER 9 , 06 .:n uruiria«ck F,ruvi.,liilg✓ fur the Cunveyance of Certain Lands to the Scott County historical Society, Inc. $ and Attaching; Certain Conditions Thereto and Placing Certain Restrictions Thereon infi];Itr:AS, Tile Scott County Historical Society, Inc. , hereinafter referred to as the Society, is a duly incorporated non-profit society under and pursuant to the lakes of the State of Minnesota, and 611ERJ1AS, Said society has made a serious study for the development of an historical site and park to be located on certain property hereinafter described and has discussed the plans evolved as a result of such study with the City Planning Couunission of the City of Shakopee and the Common Council of the City Of arid tl{e Society has secured funds for further study and development and is in the process of securing other and additional funds for said purpose, and WifEREAS, The Society has alleged and demonstrated that a prime condition prerequisite to the securing; of additional private and other funds for the further developments of said historical site and parr is the acquisition of legal title to said land, and WIlEREAS, The Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee has on June 18, 1968 by a unanimous vote of all of its members duly determined that the City property hereinafter described would serve a superior public use and purpose if in fact developed and used as contemplc►ted by the Society, and that it is not desirable for public purposes in its present state and use, and has recommended the conveyance of said land to the Scott County Historical Society,' Inc. for such purpose. TIIEF11'ORB, THE COITION COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of 30A,KQM DUES ORDAIN SECTION Is Adopting and Approving the Findin&g of the Planning Commission The Common Council hereby adopts and approves the fia4ngo of the Planning Commission chat the property hereinafter deworibsd is no longer needed by the City of Shakopee for its present use and purposes and it is not desirable for public purpose in i is present stag;, and the Council has no plan for the further r• des S C' IQ�1 Its �Arr;cti.ii (;(),,voN; ON ', ;„ r,Ur► ("ouncil of ttiu laity of ;jhako,)ee hereby authorizic6 and approves tile: conveyance ;acid transfer of title to the Scott County Historical Society, Inc. for the nominal cornsideration of One and no/100------- Dollar ----------------- the followinL; described tract of land, to-wit; Tlie following part of the City property, which City property is described as follows, to-wit: Government Lots 1 and 2, Section 32, 'Township 116 North, R<tnVe 22 West; that part of Government Lots 1 and 2, the Northwest .;uarter of the Northeast quarter, and the Northwest ..quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 5, Township 115 North, Ran,;e 22 1Jest lying North of the North line of State Trunk Highway X101, being Route #1879 which said property to be conveyed by this deed is more particularly described as follows; lying last of the following line: Beginning at a point on the centerline of the West bound lane of Trunk Highway ,¢101, distant 1071.07 feet (as measured along the centerline of said lane) Last of the West line of Section 5, Township 115, R,+n� u 22; thence North at right angles a distance of 202 feet; thence deflecting to th-i West at an angle of 870481 a distance of 67.75 fuct; thence deflecting to the North at an angle of 23010' a distance of 251.4 feet; thence deflecting to the North at an anL;le of 2)0)6' a distance of 403.1 feet; thence North a distance of 130 feet more or les:3 to a point 30 feet Nortle'of the Aiorth bank of the lull reek; thance Easterly and parallel to said North bank to the Minnesota River and there terminating. Excepting; therefrom the following described tracts: 1. The Northeast (quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast quarter, Section 5, Township 115 North, Range 22 West, lying North of the North lire of State Trunk Highway #1019 and Reserving, however, unto the City of Shakopee all right, title and interest in all structures and improvements in and on anu the right to possess for a period not to exceed ten years -frow and after January 1, 1969 the following tract, to-wits The South Half of the Southeast quarter of Northwest quarter of Northeast quarter of Northwest quarter of Section 51, Township 115 North , Range 22 West lying North of the North line of State Trunk Highway #101, and Reserving further, as a roadway, a strip of land 50-feet in width, the center- line of which coincides with the centerline of the existing traveled roadway as presently located and traveled; said strip of land being located in the Northwest (4aarter of ;section 5, Township 115 North, Range 22 West and running in a general on w. Highw li � NZ?►4 �t i1Sl:.'lUu IL: l.1_ii1.L<ii,i., i t n: 1'11u(,i• ii 'IL Said transfer anti cunvuyance above authorizuri and dire;ctett shall be upon OW following conditions, limitations, restrictions and further reservations, to-wit: A. The site is to be devc,lopad for and used as art Historical Society Park and Museum at the sole cx}):nse of the Scott County Historical Soeietyp Inc. acid the said development shall be comtuenced within twelve (12) months from the adoption of this ordinance and shall continue thereafter under the direction of Said Scott County Historical Society, Inc. for the benefit, use and education of the general public, and upon such reasonable; non-uxal.usive restrictions and li.►aitations as may be adopted by said society. B. `!'hat the site at►d aid improve►►ents and betterments placed thereon shall not be sold, encu►uberc:d, wortLat;od or hypothecated, and that the Society shall keep said property free of any and all liens and other Atachments at all times. C. That thu Society shall hold the City free and harmlese from any and all claims ar-isitt,; out of tt►e use and development of said site as aforementioned and will defend the City against any and all claims of whatever kind# Y%&tµr.o or dosarip- tion, and before opening to the public shall file with the City of Shakopee a public liability policy with the City of Shakopee and Scott County Historical Society, Inc. named as assuredS thereunder. L. That the Society maintain at all times, a minimum active, paid-up membership roster of one hundred 100 Scott County residents. E. That the Society file complete annual financial statements with the City of Shakopee, indicating all monies directed to$ and received for# the Shakopee project to be developed on the htereinbefore described 14nd; and verilAn that at least a substantial amount of all said monies be committed for the physical develop►net;t and artifacts to be placed on and for the ►gaintenaoce of. paid project, on said land above described. F. That the Society hold at least two general meetings per yaar and an r i 'lames �t :11L J, Ut l :/ L i :il�.0 i.' ailf!J 5:11UIi1J� 1'1i.( �UL 11!Cl.11'1'LI1 cA[l�' il., bility (1a11181(;e5 or iniiov llity whatsoever to said ;society. H. 1'hLAt, should the a()cioty fail to attract the anticipated financial support and to develop anu use andproperly maintain said site as proposed and hereinbefore set out, or fail to comply with any of the terns o-t this ordinance, title to said site together with all improvements and betterments thereon shall revert :to and become vested in th:: City of Shakopee free and clear of any claims of any person, firm, corporation or a:jsociation; and any dispute or question as to the Society's performance hure-.nder shall be in the first instance determined by the Common Council of the 'ity of Shakopee at a public hoaxing to be held after thirty days' written notice to said society spccifying the ,grounds for said hearing, with the right of the Society to appeal to tile, District Court of proper jurisdiction within thirty days after said huarinC and deterrgnation by the Council. I. That the Society by accepting this conveyance waives any and all claims that it now has or may hereinafter have for its own benefit or the general public or for its invitees and licensees against the City of Shakopee for any reason or cause that arose, arises or might arise or result from the operatign of the present sewage disposal facilities operated by the City of Shakopee in the vicinity of the sewage above described property of any future/disposal operations carried on in the vicinity of the above described land. SECTION Id: Separability Each and every section, provision and part of this ordinance is separable .. from any other section, provision or part, and, should any sectionA provision or part be field unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, provision or part hereof. SI;.CTIOf! V: Acceptance by the Society and When in Force This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its I nevi I } I I.• l n, .,l' Charts of sill �l '4W Passed in Ad j .Hey:. su:3slun of Lho Couuaun Council of thu City of Shakopee held this day of December 1y6 8 " Ltv Presi f e Common Council City Recorder d this a f jjecembej7 196$ . mayo t Ci y of Shakopee Prepared anti approved as to form this 13th day of December, 1968. City Attorney oe r 14- CITY OF SHAKOPEE INCORPORATED 1870 129 E. First Ave., Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612)445-3650 ' ,c May 31 , 1979 � Ms . Margaret McFarlane Minnesota Valley Restoration Hiway 101 Shakopee , MN 55379 Dear Ms . McFarlane : It is my understanding that we have reached the following agreements in our meeting of May 31st in the Shakopee City Hall . 1 . No further construction will take place on the two apartment buildings until the permits have been issued by the City Council . 2 . you will submit a letter to the City of Shakopee requesting the City to waive the local building, park fees and penalty fees and I will present this to the City Council at their meeting of June 5th. 3 . The City of Shakopee will issue the Building Permits for this project when the electrical and mechanical plans have been submitted and approved. 4 . The requirements concerning the load strength, sound transmission and fire separation for the apartments can be met in a number of ways and the City is requiring only that the appropriate State Building Code requirements be met in some manner. We would suggest that you work out the specific type of construction with your engineers and architects . 5 . I will present to the City Council your request for a loan of 50 percent , the cost of constructing the water system when it has been approved by Scott County. I understand that there will be an agreement prepared which will set forth the specifics of the loan. r � 1 1 z r f v 1' r 7 re s s ' r t A-C---1 n............u..c.....i....e. Ms . Margaret McFarlane -2- May 31 , 1979 6 . I will ask for an opinion of the City Attorney- concerning the legality of the City loaning the money for this project . Sincerely , Douglas S. Reeder City Administrator DSR/jiw cc: Mayor Walt Harbeck Dennis Hron H. R. Spurrier , City Engineer scoff-CahUeh �cohoVniC 000d, gV- Corpor,ite Officers Sixth and Oak CAR Mr. Wallace Ess-Chairperson CARVER, MINN. 55315 Chaska Mr_Joe Ott-Vice Chairperson Phone' 448-2302 Belle Plaine Mr. Clarence Welter-Secretary Treasurer COMMUNITY New PragLIE � PRACTION OGRAM Mr Jodson L Kenyon Executive Director MAY 2 4 May 22, 1979 CjTy of SHAK OPEE Doug Reeder - City Administrator City of Shakopee Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Doug, I am writing on behalf of the Board of Directors of Scott-Carver Economic Council to express its appreciation to the City of Shakopee for the use of the city 's Eagle Creek Hall. SCEC has made excellent utilization of the building for a base of op- erations for a Thrift Shop and intake and referaZ base for many of our programs. It has certainly filled a large void that existed in SCEC's programming. Many low-income citizens in Shakopee and surrounding areas have benifitted from the use of that building. I am also writing to request an extension of that lease for another year with the same terms. This would extend the lease from June 1st 1979 thru May 31, 1980. In addition SCEC would like to suggest undertaking some energy saving activities on the building which would not aZter the structure to any extend but would certainly make it a more viable structure. Things such as adding insulation in the ceiling, installing "plastic insider" storms, building a vestibule for the front doors and studding and insulating certain walls. The cost factor for this would be approximately $1000.00. SCEC has done a complete energy audit on the building and SCEC would be in a position to definitely furnish labor for the work at no cost to the City and depending on the scope of the work could possibly assist on materials. We feet that both the City would have a building whose value to the community has increased and that SCEC because of the cost of utilities which SCEC pays would save also. I wish to thank you in advance for your consideration of this extension. Respectfully yo , Judson L. Kenyon Executive Director "An Equal Opportunity Employer" A. COUNTY COURT HOUSE - SHAKOPEE, MN. 55379 (612) 445-7750 EXT.399 1979 ' 0 Mr. Douglas Reeder City Clerk 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mr. Reeder: 1. Dick You may r.e(.dll di�.alSSiO1lS in 1977 between the city Counci , Howard (Scott County iiL-uan Services Planner) ; 'and me concerning Community health Sclvices a.-,d -he County Health 01ficer ^onc.ept. In t},ose meetings, c.. t c•.ities expressed an interest in having their own Deputy Health Officer. At this time, I would lit a you to submit the names of two pl►ysiciatib accc,taole t^ you as a Deputy Health officer. The Deputy Health Officer would serve as an adjunct to the County Health officer when he/she is un_. avaiiable nor service: to the .ommunity. Arta, :ie1 is a^ unsigned copy of the contract between the two principals; `ae Scott Gout-cy Human Service Board and the Deputy Health Officer. Spice Llae two additional sii;nator:es of thosF i.mpor::aril: t'� t^.e work of the Deputy Health Officer. Ditties, •:ompensation, author_ty, etc. are detailed ;.1-1 i:he contract. A .,e mn. eLed contract will be sent for our records. Th4nk you c r �_ t' c � y ror yc;ur participaticrl in *this cooperative effort. Sin:crely, ,r: B. Smith, Dir2ctcr Human Start;i cos Ac'auinistration AL--achment - Deputy Health Officer Contract HUMAN SERVICE ADMINISTRATION Susan Baxter Smith, Director Scott County Is A. Loual Opportunity Employer SCOTT COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES BOARD DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT entered into and executed this day of 1979, between the Scott County Human Services Board as a Board of Health of the County of Scott (hereinafter BOARD) and the DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER. WHEREAS, the BOARD has general authority and responsibility for the development and maintenance of an integrated system of. community health services pursuant. to Minnesota Statutes 145.914 subd. 1 and WHEREAS, the BOARD has responsibility to and shall ensure responsible medical consultation and direction by employing or contracting with a practicing licensed physican pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 145.914 subd. 6, and WHEREAS, the CITIES of Scott County desire to retain the option to main- tain a DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER to assist in protecting the public's health, NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED: I. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE SCOTT COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES BOARD RELATING TO HEALTH OFFICERS FOR SCOTT COUNTY: A. The BOARD shall annually appoint a physician to be the COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER/MEDICAL CONSULTANT and fulfill the duties of that office. B. The BOARD shall annually request the municipality to submit the names of two local physicians they find acceptable to be appointed DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER to the COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER. C. The BOARD shall reimburse the DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER for services rendered in fulfilling the duties of DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER as specified in II-A-F. The reimbursement for services rendered by the DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER shall be made in accordance with the TERMS OF PAYMENT AND CONDITIONS OF PAYMENT specified in sections V-B and V-C respectively. II. DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER'S DUTIES A. The DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER shall report to the COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER or his/her designated agents any and all public health or human services problems or needs that are the responsibility of the BOARD, including for ex, ample communicable disease cases, child abuse and neglect, environmental health problems, etc. B. The DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER shall consult with and assist the COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER in the identification and development of the medical aspects of health services and human services development. C. The DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER shall assist in the develop- ment and maintenance of standards in the medical aspects of health services and human services programs at the discretion of the COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER. D. The DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER shall participate in community health and human services education programs at the direction of the COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER. i I E. The DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER shall assume and fulfill the medical responsibilities in disease prevention and con- trol and environmental health services at the advice or direction of the COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER. F. The DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER shall assume and fulfill the medical responsibilities in providing consultation and assistance to immunizations, screening, and other com- munity clinics or activities at the advice or direction of the COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER. III. THE HEALTH OFFICER FURTHER AGREES TO THE FOLLOWING: A. The DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER shall at his/her own expense procure and maintain general liability and professional liability insurances to cover himself/herself in amounts and types appropriate to provide adequate protection rela- tive to the activities as described within this agreement. B. The DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER shall annually furnish the BOARD with a certificate of insurance indicating coverage for compensation, general liability and professional liability while performing the activities described under the terms of this agreement. IV. TERM OF CONTRACT: This contract shall be effective on the 1st day of July, 1979, and shall remain in effect until the 31st day of December, 1979, or until cancelled or terminated as pro- vided herein. V. CONSIDERATION, TERMS AND CANCELLATION OF PAYMENT A. Consideration for all services and duties performed and goods or materials supplied by the DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER pursuant to this contract shall be paid by the BOARD as follows: 1. The DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER shall be compensated for the services rendered at the rate of $50.00 per hour when acting in the capacity of DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER to the COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER. Payment for the terms of this agreement shall not exceed $1,000.00. 2. Reimbursement for travel and subsistence expenses actually and necessarily incurred by the DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER in performance of this contract will be paid by the BOARD at the current rates for mileage, meals, etc. These payments will be trade only when the DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER acts in the capacity of the DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER. B. TERMS OF PAYMENT: Payments for Compensation shall be promptly made by the BOARD to the DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER for services rendered according to the terms of this agreement. Payments will be made to the DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER by the BOARD fol- lowing reception of an invoice by the DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER_ to the COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER for services rendered. C. CONDITIONS OF PAYMENT: All services and duties performed by the DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER pursuant to this contract shall be performed to the satisfaction of the BOARD and the COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER, and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances and rules and regulations as a condition of payment. VI. CANCELLATION: This contact may be cancelled by the BOARD or DEPUTY HEALTH OF- FICER at any time, .with or without cause, upon sixty (60) days written notice to the other party. -2- i VII. ASSIGNMENTS: The DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER shall neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this contract without the prior written consent of the BOARD. VIII. AMENDMENTS: Any amendments to this contract shall be in writing. MEDICAL CONSULTANT/ SCOTT COUNTY HUMAN COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER SERVICES BOARD CHAIRMAN Dr. Anthony Spagnolo Shakopee Medical Center 1335 E. 10th Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 DEPUTH HEALTH OFFICER SCOTT COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES DIRECTOR ADDRESS: Susan B. Smith ;,3,_ x q CITY OF SHAKOPEE INCORPORATED 1870 129 E. First Ave., Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612)445-3650 t•; l�{ t' May 29 , 1979 Mr. M. D. Ramsdell 3101 Keating Court Burnsville , MN 55337 Dear Mr. Ramsdell : Mayor Harbeck has asked me to respond to your letter of May 23rd concerning the MWCC. First of all , I want to congratu- late you on your appointment to this most important body. I am sure you will find your involvement with the Waste Control Commission to be rewarding. This Commission is certainly faced with many opportunities to accomplish their duties in an ever more complex environment . We would enjoy having you attend one of our City Council meetings . The Shakopee City Council normally meets on the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of each month. If it would be convenient for you, we would like to have you attend our meeting on July 17th at 8 :00 PM. We do have some meetings before that date, but the agendas have already grown quite long and we do want to have enough time to discuss with you our position on several matters. Of interest to the City are the following matters : 1 . The proposed sludge farm in Shakopee. 2 . Construction of the Jackson Interceptor. 3 . Hazardous waste disposal . 4. Future plans for Blue Lake . If you are available on this date , or if there is a more convenient time for you, we would appreciate your meeting with us . If you can let us know your preference , we will schedule you for a meeting. Again, thank you for representing us on this most important commission and for offering to meet with us . Sincerely, Douglas S. Reeder City Administrator DSR/jiw cc : City Council T 11co rogress cl y An Equal Opportunity Employer r May 23, 1979 The Honorable Walter Harbeck Mayor of Shakopee 1305 W. 6th Avenue Shakopee, Minn. 55379 Dear Mayor Harbeck: I would like to introduce myself to you and your Political Unit. I am M. E. Ramsdell (Ed) and have been appointed to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission for our area. I am very interested in developing a positive working relationship with you to insure I represent and articulate our districts view points to the Waste Control Commission. Could you please provide me with your normal meeting schedule so I may schedule an appearance at the earliest. Thanks in advance for your cooperation. Sincerely, M. E. Ramsdell 3101 Keating Court Burnsville, MN. 55337 Phone Numbers: (Home) 612-894-5664 (Bus. ) 612-853-4991 a MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Douglas S. Reeder , City Administrator RE: Larry Martin, Asst . City Assessor , Probation DATE: May 31 , 1979 Attached is an evaluation of Larry Martin during his probationary period with the City of Shakopee . I concur with the evaluation and feel very confident in his ability to carry on the entire assessing function for the City of Shakopee upon the resignation of Leroy Houser . It is my recommendation at this time that you adopt the attached resolution increasing Larry Martin' s salary from $13 ,000 to $14,000 per year effective June 1 , 1979. In addition it is recommended that you appoint him as Acting City Assessor for the City of Shakopee effective June 15th. It will probably be my recommendation that he be made the City Assessor at some time in the future , if his performance continues to be good. DSR/ jsc CITY OF SHAKOPEE 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 .Q MEMO TO: .___Douglas FROM:--LeRoy Houser SUBJECT: __Larry Martin -7 Six month evaluation DATE:—.._May_...23_1�Z�--- - Mr. Larry Martin' s six month probation will be completed at the end of May. During the six months Mr. Martin has worked under me, he has shown an exceptional amount of ability, ambition and responsibility. He has demonstrated an exceptional amount of patience in dealing with the public and exactness and detail in his work. He has the ability to handle the responsibility of 'City Assessor" and I am confident he can provide the City with an excellent and supportive assessment . I personally feel Mr. Martin is an asset and a credit to our staff. It is by this evaluation, I recommend Mr. Martin be employed as a permanent employee. Any consideration that could be given to Mr. Martin in providing him with a pay increase will be appreciated. LFH:plk i MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Douglas S . Reeder City Administrator RE : Building Inspector DATE : May 31 , 1979 Attached is the resignation of Leroy Houser effective June 15 , 1979 . I have taken the liberty of advertising for a Building Inspector in the Minneapolis Star and Shakopee Valley News . I am advertising for a Building Inspector only with a starting salary range of $20,000 to $23 ,000. It is my hope to have a recommendation for an appointment at your next meeting on June 19th. It is my feeling that we will not be able to find a combination Assesser/Building Inspector and I am confident enough in Larry Martin that I am recommending we totally split the jobs at this time . We will be lucky to find a competent Building Inspector. DSR/jiw Attachment a May 30, 1979 Honorable Mayor & City Council 129 E. lst Avenue Shakopee , Minnesota 55379 Effective June 15, 1979 , I am terminating my employment with the City of Shakopee . I have accepted a very challenging position with York Development Corporation. At this time , I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the cooperation and support afforded me by all past and present members of local government and local government staff. It has been a sincere pleasure and privilege serving you and the people of this fine City. Respectfully submitted, LeRoy F. Houser SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS 800 OSBORN BUILDING SAINT PAUL,MINNESOTA 55102 (612) 222-4241 OSMON R.SPRINGS TED,Pre-,itlent DAVID L.GOBLIRSCH.Senor V.ce President ROBERT D.PCLSOHER,First Senor V,en Pureitlent CAROLYN J.WIL LS,Vice President a Secretary-Treaaarer RONALDW.lANGNE6S.S,iro V,cePio'i",1t KINGSLEYD.FORNESS,V.cePresident 30 May 1 979 Ca �l SC OWN D Mr. Doug Reeder MAY 3 1 1979 City Administrator City Hall C17y OF SHAKOPEE Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: Request for Issuance of Industrial Development Bonds for K-Mart Shopping Center Dear Mr. Reeder: We have reviewed the material you sent us and compared that data to your requirements for approval of commercial development issues. The data submitted conforms largely to your requirements with the following exceptions: I. It appears that the issuance of bonds for this program is contemplat- ed. Your policy relative to these programs requires the issuance of one or more mortgage revenue notes, rather than bonds, if a commercial project is to be constructed. •2. There is no specific breakdown of total costs for individual requirements of the issue such as building, furnishings, property development and cost of issuance. In the event you require the issuance of a mortgage note or notes for this program, your policies require a certification that real estate value is equal to at least 90% of the total face amount of the notes issued. That certification is not included in the material submitted. It is possible that certification cannot be made available at this time, and if notes are used, the construction and or final lender may have to provide that for you after a review of final cost estimates and construction plans submitted by the developer. The application indicates that Lynch and Lynch of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is to be designated as bond counsel. The City in the past has selected bond counsel, and I believe has used the Dorsey office for issues of this type. In the event you wish to designate a different firm as bond counsel, you might wish to consider retention of your own legal counsel for the purpose of reviewing all legal documentation required by the issue. A review and approval of the indenture of trust and the 9 Mr. Reeder 30 May 1979 Page 2 mortgage documents would seem to be particularly critical. Approval of your counsel of the documents should be a condition of any resolution expressing intent to issue these obligations. Prior to passage of any final resolution, we would suggest you review the final terms of the proposed K-Mart lease, the proceeds which are to be pledged as partial security for the payment of the obligations. You will want to satisfy yourselves that the required lease payments and term will be sufficient to pay the entire cost of the obligations when due. I am returning the material you sent us relative to this matter. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact us. Ver sincerely yours, i5 =-zc,d t-1, 4, Robert D. Pulscher First Senior Vice President Enclosures /cep r L MEMO TO : Douglas S . Reeder City Administrator FROM: James A. Dittrich Assistant Administrator RE: Submission of LAWCON/LCMR Pre-application DATE : May 31 , 1979 Pre-applications for the Fiscal Year 1980 LAWCON/LCMR Grant are due to the State Planning Agency and Metropolitan Council for review by June 29 , 1979 . Grants up to 75 percent of the total project costs are available . A breakdown of revenue sources for project costs are as follows : LAWCON Grants 50% LCMR Grants 25% Local Share 25% A limit of $100,000.00 for the total grant amount has been set . Because of the grant limits and the breakdown of revenue sources for meeting project costs , $132 ,000.00 is the maximum project cost . Due to a maximum of $100,000.00 available for acquisition purposes in the rural area (of which O'Dowd Lake is a part) allocation, I feel it is necessary for the City to alter its grant application this year. My recommendations are : a) Submit a preliminary grant application to solicit funds to acquire approximately eight lots each at $15 ,000.00 around O'Dowd Lake. This acquisition is on the northwest ,end of the lake, adjacent to the 1979 proposed purchases . The total cost of the project is approximately $130,000.00. The local share would be made up from part of the proceeds of the O'Dowd Bond sale provided that this bond sale is approved . b) SubmSi�o�an5econd preliminary grant application for the4ndevelopment of the JEJ Park which is located south of 11th Avenue and east of the Jr. High School . The planning consultant , Chuck Reisenberg, is presently working on development plans for JEJ. The local share for the JEJ development costs would come from park dedication funds . Iii" Douglas S . Reeder -2- May 31 , 1979 More detailed information will be available at the June 6th City Council, meeting. City staff is seeking a motion from the City Council to submit two pre-applications for LAWCON/LCMR funds . JAD/jiw CITY OF SHAKOPEE 129 East First Avenue Shako }t pee, Minnesota 55379 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Douglas S . Reeder City Administrator ator SUBJECT: Holiday Garbage Schedule DATE: June 1 , 1979 Apparently Shakopee is the only community served by Woodlake where the garbage service is delayed on holidays . Everywhere else the garbage is collected on the regular schedule for every holiday except Christmas . If the City Council would prefer this arrangement , which may end some confusion that results on each holiday, I think we could get this changed . DSR:nae ' 4 ORDINANCE NO. 2 3 -_ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5 OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY CODE BY PROVIDING A NEW PARAGRAPH H TO SUB- DIVISION 4 OF SECTION 5.02, ENTITLED "ESTABLISH- MENTS ELIGIBLE". Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Shakopee as follows : Section 1. The Shakopee City Code, Chapter 5, Section 5.02, is hereby amended to provide the following new Paragraph H thereto: "H. Establishments Eligible. No on-sale liquor license shall be issued or renewed for any establishment which contains more than 6,000square feet unless: 1. Said establishment qualifies as a restaurant as defined in this Chapter; and 2. Said establishment receives at least 50 percent of its gross receipts from the sale of food for consumption on the premises. For purposes of this Paragraph, "square feet of space" is defined as customer used floor area. " Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Adopted by the Shakopee City Council this day of June, 1979. By the City Council for the City of Shakopee Mayor Walter Harbeck ATTEST: Douglas S. Reeder, Administrator PREPARED AND APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Krass , Mahanan, Meyer & Kanning Assistant Shakopee City Attorneys 1221 Fourth Avenue East Shakopee, MN 55379 A CITY OF SHAKOPEE ;"}J 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 MEMO A/ TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator .,,.. SUBJECT I ce Arena DATE: June 1 19 7 9 I have sent you a staff study on the feasibility of the proposed ice arena . I am suggesting that the City Council discuss this matter as soon as possible and suggest that possibly a 5 :00 P.M. meeting on June 12th would be an appropriate time . I and several Council members will be meeting at 8:00 P.M. with the Seven Man Joint Committee on that evening, but a 5 :00 P .M. meeting would work. The ice arena committee is ready to go shortly and I believe we need to get everything agreed to before they begin raising money. DSR:nae a I / MEMO TO: Douglas S . Reeder City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland Finance Director RE: CETA Position DATE : June 5 , 1979 In response to the letter from the County concerning the possibility of new CETA positions , I would like to submit an application for consideration of the Council and the County. The position involved would be in support of improved purchasing procedures , improved processing and follow-up on invoices , maintaining an improved and more efficient filing system, provide skilled secretarial supports and fulfill an important function allowing a division of duties in the receipt/disbursement cycle for much improved internal control . GV/jiw MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council ' FROM: Douglas S. Reeder , City Administrator fi RE: Holmes Street Reconstruction DATE: June 1 , 1979 - - -� CONCLUSION: After reviewing the Holmes Street Project and comparing the current status with the needed schedule to construct it this year , I must now report to you that it is now no longer possible to construct the Holmes Street Project this year. This conclusion is based on the following assumptions . 1 . It is desirable to have this project designed and inspected by by city staff , rather than by consultants 2. It is not desirable to begin to construct the project on a piece meal basis 3. It would be virtually impossible to have this project under construction this year -- even using consultants until August which would leave a mess in a high traffic area all winter 4. The construction of the VIP trunk sewer and the completion of the 4th and Minnesota Project have a higher priority In addition, we have determined that the results of not constructing Holmes Street this year are not as severe as we had expected. We will stand to lose no more than $5,000 in State Aid by not committing the money now. We will of course lose additional money because the cost of construc- tion will continue to rise; however, we feel these efferts of the delay are at this point more reasonable than attempting to do the project now. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that this meeting between the City Council and the Holmes Street Ad Hoc Committee be used to cover the following matters : 1 . Determine and agree on the scope of the project which the City Council wants the Committee to consider: a] Storm sewer should include the entire drainage area and construction of replacing pipes in any street torn up for storm sewer construction b] Water should include the senior citizen highrise project c] Sanitary Sewer analysis should include any street being torn up for storm sewer construction 1 . I Holmes Street Reconstruction June 1 , 1979 Page -2- d] Sidewalk policy? e ] Road and curb and gutter should include examination of any street torn up by any of the above utilities 2 . Discuss in more detail the alternative assessment policies and their impact on the individual property owners using the attached informa- tion. Agree on some general assessment policies or request additional information from staff . The attached computations give the alternatives you requested at the last joint meeting. I need to clarify one other area of concern--the levy limit . If we issue general obligation bonds to pay the city' s share of the cost of any project , the annual interest and debt retirement payments on these bonds will not be included in our mill levy limit. This means that it will not increase our potential for a levy limit concern, but it would still increase the property taxes each year in an era when such increases in taxes are not highly thought of . Ata the eachspecific shouldebeof mills levied for public improvement deb t retirement set at some maximum level . 3 . Agree on a Time Schedule for this project. The following is suggested for discussion purposes : June 5th - Set scope of project June 19th - Set general assessment policy July 3rd - Joint Agreement on project July 11th - Accept Feasibility Study and set public hearing August 1 - Committee hold Public Meeting August 21 - Committee report to City Council results of public meeting and project recommendations Sept . 4 - Council hold public hearing Sept . 18 - Order preparation of plans and specifications Nov. 20 - Accept Plans and Specifications and order project Nov. 21 - Submit project for state and metro approval Jan. 2nd - Request project bids Feb. 5th - Award project bid Feb. 19th - Sell project bonds a, Holmes Street Reconstruction June 1 , 1979 Page -3- March 1st - Start Construction Sept . 1st - Complete Construction Sept . 10th - Hold Assessment Hearing, Approve Assessment Roll If an agreement can be reached on the above matters , and stick very closely to the above schedule , I believe the Holmes Street project can become a well considereretotadlargetarealofeShakop project , which will result in major improvements DSR/ jsc T r HOLMES STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 50% Assessed - 50% Paid By City r TAX SEWER ITEM TOTAL COST ASSESSED STATE AID FAU FUNDS CITY LEVY INCREMENT SPUC FUND 1 . Roadway $216 , 750 $53 ,975 $162 , 775 2 . Curb & Gutter 124 ,850 655960 58,890 3 . Sidewalk 43 ,490 $43 ,490 4. Watermain 98,610 $70, 000 $28,610 5 . Sanitary Sewer 99 ,340 49 ,670 $49 ,670 6 . Storm Sewer 1 , 193 ,500 596 %750 417 ,635 179 ,115 TOTAL $1 , 776 ,540 766 ,355 639 ,300 43 ,490 179 , 115 701000 28,610 49 ,670 40% Assessed - 60 % Paid By City 1. Roadway 216 , 750 43 , 180 162 , 775 10, 795 2 . Curb & Gutter 124 , 850 52 , 768 58 ,890 13 , 192 { 3 . Sidewalk 43 ,490 43 ,490 4 . Watermain 983610 70, 000 28 ,610 5 . Sanitary Sewer 991340 39 , 736 59 ,604 6 . Storm Sewer 1 , 1933500 596 ,750 417 ,635 179 , 115 TOTAL $1 ,776 , 540 732 ,434 639 ,300 435490 203 , 102 70, 000 28,610 59 ,604 NNEOPWI- HOLMES STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 30% Assessed - 70% Paid By City TAX SEWER ITEM TOTAL COST ASSESSED STATE AID FAU FUNDS CITY LEVY INCREMENT SPUC FUND 1. Roadway $216 , 750 $32 ,385 162 ,775 $21,590 2 . Curb & Gutter 124,850 39 ,576 58,890 13 , 192 3 . Sidewalk 43 ,490 43 ,490 4. Watermain 98 , 610 70,000 28, 610 5 . Sanitary Sewer 99 ,340 29,802 69,538 6 . Storm Sewer 1 ,193 ,500 5963750 417 ,635 179 , 115 TOTAL 1 , 776 ,540 698,513 639 ,300 43 ,490 227 ,089 70,000 28,610 69 ,538 20% Assessed - 80% Paid By City 1. Roadway 2165750 21,590 1623775 32 , 385 2 . Curb & Gutter 124,850 26,384 58, 890 39 , 576 { 3 . Sidewalk 43,490 43 ,490 4. Watermain 98, 610 70,000 28,610 5 . Sanitary Sewer 99 , 340 19,868 79 ,472 6 . Storm Sewer 1 , 193 , 500 596 , 750 417, 635 1795115 Total 1 , 776, 540 664,592 639 , 300 43 ,490 2511076 705000 28 , 610 793472 AVERAGE ASSESSMENTS 50% Assessed Residential Non-Residential Unit Average Unit Average Item Assessment Assessment Assessment Assessment 1 . Roadway $ 8 .01/ff $ 576 . 72 $16 .03/ff $ 1 ,154. 16 2 . Curb & Gutter 9 . 79/ff 704 . 88 19 . 59/ff 1 ,410 .48 3 . Sanitary Sewer 15 . 37/ff 1 , 106 . 64 30. 74/ff 2 ,213 . 28 4 . Storm Sewer 0 .084514/sf 720.06 0. 169027/sf 1 ,440. 11 TOTAL $ 3 , 108 . 30 $ 6 , 218 .03 40% Assessed 1 . Roadway $ 6 .41/ff $ 461 . 52 $12 . 82/ff $ 923 .04 2 . Curb & Gutter 7 . 83/ff 563 . 76 15 . 67/ff 1 ,128 . 24 3 . Sanitary Sewer 12 . 29/ff 884. 88 24. 59/ff 1 , 770.48 4 . Storm Sewer 0 .084514/sf 720.06 0. 169027/sf 1 ,440. 11 TOTAL $ 2 ,630.22 $ 5 ,261 . 87 30% Assessed 1 . Roadway $ 4 . 81/ff $ 346 . 32 $ 9 .62/ff $ 692 . 64 2 . Curb & Gutter 5 . 88/ff 423 . 36 11 . 75/ff 846 .00 3 . Sanitary Sewer 9 . 22/ff 663 . 84 18 .44/ff 1 ,327 . 68 4. Storm Sewer 0 .084514/sf 720 .06 0 .169027/sf 1 ,440. 11 TOTAL $ 2 ,153 . 58 $ 4,306 .43 20% Assessed 1 . Roadway $ 3 . 21 /ff $ 231 . 12 $ 6 .41/ff $ 461 . 52 2 . Curb & Gutter 3 .92/ff 282 . 24 7 . 83/ff 563 . 76 3 . Sanitary Sewer 6 . 15/ff 442 . 80 12 . 29/ff 884 . 88 4 . Storm Sewer 0.084514/sf 720 .06 0. 169027/sf 1 ,440. 11 TOTAL $ 1 ,676 . 22 $ 3 ,350. 27 HOLMES STREET STORM SEWER ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL 18" Leads L.F . 2 , 754 $ 17 . 00 $ 46 , 818 18" RCP L.F . 1 ,900 21. 00 39 , 900 21" RCP L.F . 1 ,370 23 . 60 32 ,332 24" RCP L.F. 1 ,520 26 .30 39 ,976 30" RCP L.F . 2 ,350 30. 00 70, 500 36" RCP L.F . 1 , 160 . 40. 00 46 ,400 42" RCP L.F . 760 52 . 00 39 , 520 48" RCP L.F . 760 64 . 00 48, 640 54" RCP L.F . 1 , 050 76. 00 79 , 800 66" RCP L.F . 390 100. 00 39 ,000 72" RCP L.F . 860 115 . 00 98,900 Outlet Structure EA . 1 15 , 000. 00 15 , 000 Catch Basin EA . 68 1 , 190. 00 80, 920 Standard Manhole EA . 24 900. 00 21 ,600 Special Manhole EA . 9 2 ,500. 00 22 ,500 Railroad Crossing EA . 1 5 ,000. 00 5 , 000 Rock Excavation C.Y. 2 ,000 25 . 00 50, 000 Bituminous Restoration L.F . 10,370 10. 00 103 , 700 Borrow TON 1 , 700 4. 00 63800 SUBTOTAL $887 ,306 10% Construction Contingency 88, 731 SUBTOTAL 976 ,037 6% Technical Services for Design 58,563 SUBTOTAL 11034,600 3% Technical Services for Construction 31, 000 SUBTOTAL 1 ,065 ,600 12% Improvement District Cos t (Interest , Administration, Legal Fees , collection, etc . ) 127 , 900 TOTAL $1 , 193 ,500 - r l � HOLMES STREET - STORM SEWER x� Niv, IV � C f . w a FILL r -- 4 ' 4 r - , tf3 r , l t r I 2 ; 14 �r 1 # , L- __. � r ti - - r- - - - - - - - W H . �r m _ rr ' _.. v MEMO TO: Douglas S . Reeder, City Administrator FROM: James A. Dittrich, Administrative Assistant RE: City of Roseau Letter to Mayor Harbeck DATE : May 18, 1979 In a telephone conversation with Patrick Moren, Attorney for the City of Roseau, the intent of their letter to the City of Shakopee was discussed. One of the reasons for this letter was to garner Shakopee ' s support for a legislative bill allowing local units of govern- ment the ability to disregard the MDNR' s requirement of a one foot freeboard in relation to establishment of flood plain regions . In the establishment of flood plain regions by the use of historical data, hydrological tests , etc . , the federal government (Department of Housing and Urban Development) established areas which would be affected by 100 year floods . (A 100 year flood, theoretically, would occur once in every 100 years) . The MDNR decided, without legislative mandate, to add an additional one foot of height (or freeboard) to the flood plain levels . This act, according to the City of Roseau, adds undue hardship to the City andCommunity in increased and building costs without particular justification or benefit to the community. This bill is nearly through the legislature and should be passed in the near future . Governor Quie is expected to sign the bill into law this summer. The other reason for Roseau' s letter was to solicit Shakopee ' s attendance at a state-wide meeting to discuss mutual municipal problems . To be held in conjunction with the 65th Annual League of Cities Conference, this meeting is scheduled for 7 :00 PM on June 12th in the Center Great Hall at the Radisson South Hotel , 7800 Normandale Road in Bloomington. Whether the City of Shakopee should support the legislative bill is a moot question since the bill is expected to become law in the near future . On the question whether the City should become involved in the state-wide meeting to discuss mutual problems , I recommend that the City seriously consider sending a representative to this meeting. Topics which would interest the City include a discussion of the mutual difficulties in confronting federal and state bureacracies and possible solutions to this problem . . Douglas S . Reeder -2- May 21 , 1979 ♦ derived from the shared experiences of other municipalities . Discussions of particular problems such as the sludge farm and traffic problems may also result in possible solutions derived from the experiences of other cities . JAD/jiw