The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFebruary 19, 1980 4 TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ.REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 19, 1980 Mayor Harbeck presiding ' Roll Call at 7:30 P.M. Joint Meeting with the Utilities Commission Approval of Minutes of Jan. 8th, and. Feb. 5, 1980 4] ommunications: Governor Albert Quie Scott - Carver Economic Council, Inc. c] 5 - Liaison Reports from Councilmembers: a] Cncl.Colligan from the Fire Dep't; Jt.Seven Man Committee b] Cncl.Hullander from Scott County Criminal Justice Advisory Comm. c] Cncl.Lebens from the Community Services Board d] Cncl.Leroux from the Shakopee School Board e] Cncl.Reinke from the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission f] Mayor Harbeck from Scott County Board of Commissioners 6] RECOGNITION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANYONE PRESENT IN THE AUDIENCE WHO DESIRES TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. Old Business: a] Ice Arena !3'R2 1 . Planning Commission Recommendations: reliminary Plat of Macey Second Addition, consisting of 4.5+ acres lying W of Dakota, S of 4th, E of Market and N of RR tracks (PC 80 -1P) Applicant: City of Shakopee ,. Action: Approve /Deny Planning Comm. Recommendation: City Admr. will report 4xpi vot 9] Routine Resolutions and Ordinances: Notl ak a] . No. 1564, Setting Fees for City Services Res. No. 1565, Preliminary Approval of IR Bonds for J & B 40 No Enterprises es. No. 1566, Denying Conditional Use Permit for Home Occupation ala for Dallas Herrgott Res. No. 1567, Res. of Appreciation to Kathy Kirkpatrick A l) 9 :e0 ,/I. Res. No. 1569, Final Approval of IR. Bonds for Perkins 10] New usin s: 8:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Shakopee's Community Development Programs Approving Plans on 4th and Mn. Project Improvements OP J J . proving Specs on Domolition of structures at 4th & Mn. site Conditional Use Permit for Vickers Oil V //l/II /NPTIOn J cm- ij e] Appointment to Police Civil Service Commission. No 140 In -: ] A send City Policy on Industrial Revenue Bonds. 4j' 9:30 P.M. Robert Martin, Business Mgr. School Dist. #726. rr'' ice! Authorized purchase of tank and set bid letting for truck .�QLf ' jr, Au horize purchase of fire equipment .. 'Authorize purchase of engine analyzer TENTATIVE AGENDA February 19, 1980 Page -2- Approval of the bills olmes Street Reconstruction Project - Res. No. 1568, Receiving Report (80 -3) 11] Consent Business: Appraisal of City buildings/ b] Interfund Transfers t✓ 12] Other Business: ier Approve- Surveying Services from CR -16 & CR -83 to Hwy 101 & CR -89 b] ---- /1i0t444.S F/iti. " ,4140)./ 4 (� VR kMmtr 3� 13] Adjourn to Tue• , da a• . . -_ -.— 980• Douglas S. Reeder City Administrator O p TN.E.3 .L.4.... '-'L L' kr / 9 a y, ,� M ° ` STATE OF MINNESOTA 11P0 F• 4,Ih. J OFFICE OY THE GOVERNOR ALBERT H. QUIE "2 8 1 98 p GOVERNOR ST. PAUL 55155 C!y 1F SJAKO P January 24, 1980 The Honorable Walter C. Harbeck Mayor of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 RE: S.P. 27- 618 -38 and S.P. 70- 618 -05 Federal Project No. BFBM 5003(9) County State Aid Highway No. 18 Between T.H. 494 and T.H. 101 Dear Mayor Harbeck: We received your letter of concern about unnecessary bridges and the lack of more adequate facilities on County Highway 18 across the Minnesota River. The article written by Mr. Coleman of the Minneapolis Star was researched. It was found that the bridge the article referred to is in the informal discussion stage yet. The feasibility and the design have not been determined yet and is at least a few years off. Both Dr. Tomasi's representative and the Olmsted County Engineer agree that all discussions have been in the spirit of cooperation and they have no reason to believe that the spirit of cooperation will not continue. The article was apparently very premature when it suggested that an unnecessary or over - designed bridge was going to be built in front of Dr. Tomasi's property. . A new bridge on County Highway 18 across the Minnesota River is progressing. The Project Development Report was approved by the Federal Highway Administration on November 29, 1978. Shortly thereafter, a committee was formed to select a consultant to carry on the preliminary design phase. A consultant (Barton - Aschman) was selected with the contingency that they could not start until money was available. On April 5, 1979, Hennepin and Scott Counties were notified that up to $200,000 would be available through federal legislation for preliminary. engineering. This money is a 76.74 percent federal, 23.26 percent local matching grant. The Counties have submitted programming for this money to the State. The State Legislature, . through the 1979 budget bonding law, has made available to the Counties up to $300,000 per project for matching and subsidizing federal monies for preliminary engineering. AN EOE A'_ OP °C'F' UNITY iVi'_r' "r_'i The Honorable Walter C. Harbeck January 24, 1980 Page 2 The Counties requested the full $300,000 on October 22, 1979, and the amount should be available when State bonds are sold this month. The five percent limit on interest paid on State bonds does not apply to these bonds. Upon release of the money, a formal agreement can be executed with the consultant and the preliminary engineering can begin. Attached is a copy of the time schedule established by the Counties and approved by both the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Your suggested approach, the use of tolls, for funding new highway construction has merit, but I doubt we will start that concept in Minnesota since we have no precedent here. Therefore, the issue is how can we best provide a constant funding level to accomplish the needed improvements, rehabilitation and maintenance? I have proposed a limited development level. To accomplish this, my proposal to the Legislature consists of: 1. A 4% sales tax on gasoline. 2. Bonding for the uncompleted interstate system. 3. Phased transfer after 1981 of the excise tax on motor vehicles from the general fund to the trunk highway fund. 4. Bonding for bridges. Your active support would be greatly appreciated. S' er y, ALBE T H. QUIE GOVERNOR Attachment:' 1 • 6 • PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REPORT CSAH 18 from I -494 to T.H. 101 • Hennepin County • Scott County • This Project Development Report has been prepared and submitted for the above referenced highway section in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Trans- portation Action Plan Guidelines. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION This project proposes to improve County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 18 between southern Hennepin County and northern Scott County. CSAH 18 will be located within a designated corridor between 1 -494 and Trunk Highway (T.H.) 101. The CSAH 18 project will include construction of one or more bridges across the Minnesota River. • PROJECT PATH SELECTION Based on the Mn /DOT Action Plan guidelines, it is proposed that development of this action will follow a major level path as shown below: - Project Development Report - Fall 1978 - Preliminary Location Report - Spring 1979 • - Draft Environmental Impact Statement - Spring 1980' - Location Public Hearing - Fall 1980 .• -Final Environmental Impact Statement - Fall 1981- - Preliminary Design Study Report - Spring 1982 - Design Public Hearing - Fall 1982 - Design Study Report - Spring 1983 • -Right of Way Acquisition - Fall 1985 - Plans, Specifications and Estimate - Fall 1985 • - Advertise for Bids - Spring 1986 -1- '44'4. 4 ' . V l' ° N�� STATE OF MINNESOTAR j p�1 ' `(' OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR v ALBERT H. QUIE GOVERNOR ST. PAUL 55155 F E B .1 i. MO February 7, 1980 Dear Mayor: The State of Minnesota will again hold the Conference on Natural Disasters on Friday, March 14, 1980, at the Sheraton -Ritz Hotel, 315 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, Minnesota, as a part of the State's Preparedness Program. Please consider this an invitation to you, members of your City Council, and your City Civil Defense Director to attend. The winter of 1979 -1980 has been very mild up to this point. Historically, heavy precipitation generally occurs in the latter part of February and March. We only have to recall the winter storms of 1965, 1966, and 1969 to verify this. It is my concern that we do not permit ourselves to become complacent. Municipal and county governments must be prepared to respond immediately to any threat to life and property, and the State of Minnesota must be prepared to support you. This year, the Conference will focus on changes in regulations relating to both public and individual assistance which have occurred since last year's Conference. These changes will have a great effect on assistance to areas devastated by spring floods. In addition, Mr. John Graff, Meteorologist in Charge of the National . Weather Service Forecast Office of Minneapolis, will present the spring weather outlook for 1980. If your schedule will permit, I encourage you to attend. Should your community be damaged by a disaster, the information that will be provided at this Conference will be most important to you. With best personal regards, I am Sincerely yo s,. i aM i IZI4- • ALBERT H. QUIE GOVERNOR ._. . f AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER =i3 a '.. • GZ f CL,- • 7 STATE OF MINNESOTA D EPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES B5 - State Capitol St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 GOVERNOR'S NATURAL DISASTER CONFERENCE March 14, 1980 Sheraton -Ritz Hotel 315 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, Minnesota REGISTRATION FORM • Registration for the Governor's Natural Disaster Conference $11.00 per person (Price includes Luncheon and Registration Fee.) Name Organization Name Organization Name Organization Name Organization Please return this form with your remittance no later than FEBRUARY 28, 1980 to: Minnesota Division of Emergency Services Room B5 - State Capitol St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Attention: Honey Harkenrider PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: TREASURER - STATE OF MINNESOTA Total Amount Enclosed $ ,Registration will be in the Foyer outside of the Cotillion Ballroom from 7:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. 2 -6 -80 • • • 1,SN'";0,17.!- .�� • • • CITY ®E SHAK ®]PEE 309N te • `�. .. 'V • INCORPORATED 1870 Ii s b 129 E. First Ave., Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445 -3650 5 -` • fV .f� • • . i. e „ . December 21, 1979 ` • The Honorable Albert Quie , Governor, State of Minnesota • • 520 Federal Building ••. • Ft. Snelling •. St. Paul, MN 55111 • , • Dear Governor Quie: • • This letter is to bring to you my concern in the area of • State funding for the construction of the new bridge and roads . in the Metropolitan area. As you know so well, we are currently having severe problems in strecthing the funds available for • highway and bridge construction and maintenance. '• The alternative normally put forth to combat the lack of ' sufficient funds-is an increase in the gas tax. This idea seems ' appropriate since we are already taxing that commodity and since''' ' • ,,. , it is a use tax. It is my feeling, however, that the'gas tax should be used to maintain the existing roads and'that.by remov- ing new construction this funding source will allow better -main- tenance of these roads. Some other source of funding should be ' ' found for new construction of needed roads. The "other source" I refer to is the use of tolls on new • facilities to pay for the cost of the new facility. Many other states have',realized for a number of years that the most ..realistic way to fund new construction is through the use of tolls on the new facilities. This allows the actual users of •• the new facilities to pay for their construction and not people • who are buying gas for•use on city streets or other existing roadways. The use of tolls is best suited to pay for the co•stof major • highways and bridges which are heavily traveled by many people•from• . • throughout the Metropolitan area and the•state. The'use of tolls should be limited to the initial construction costs and then the toll should be removed and the gasoline tax be used for'maintenance purposes. :This financing method lets the people who will use the • • new facility pay for it • • The r1Cc7rl of %fir jr ss Vol icy An Eoual 0000rtunity Emolover ' (-F * . ' ' ae Honorable, Albert Quie -2- December 21, 1979 • I hope you will give this concept your careful consideration . ':','. as you again consider alternative methods of providing money for '.•''' the construction of work in the state. This concept was, of course, discussed in past legislative sessions for specific propals namely the bridge across the Minnesota River. I believe the reports and proposals prepared for that matter would be of use , in again bringing forth this concept, of which time, I strongly • .'believe, has come in Minnesota. • I appreciate your interest in this request and will be . happy to work with you in any way you feel appropriate. Sincerely, , . . 4,., , p_./ 1 / 4 4- , - ;Z4,..,46, 0 ,-,, 5:___ .' ......', Walt C. Harbeck • . , .'h: Mayor - City of Shakopee . WCH /ljw . • • . , . ;; -. • I • • • • • • • • • • • ' r . r. , / J qeott_cakiet 2eoo'nie (iouei, Aie ( "Irr= Slxth and Oak ntl w ;hd Es�•i:IU „rErk•If.,;n C A P CARVER, MINN. 55315 (.Il.,sh,l �a11 J V11 Vlt. t; (:Il,nl i.:•n, :. � 79/8 1 Hr110 1'la.ne Phunu 449 2302 hra r, ,3:,rr•1 New I1r,11Jue COMMOTION FEB 0 . PNUOQAM 11 .IU,rauI1 L Kal,yun FEB l).:.•. r fi CITY OF SHAKOPEE January 30, 1980 . Mayer Walter Harbeck City of Shakopee Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mayer Harbeck, • I am writing in regard to two openings the Scott - Carver Economic Council Board of Directors currently has open. I would appreciate it if you could share the following information with your board or council. Due to the recent resignation of Joe Ott, Belle Plaine and the unexpected death of Clarence Welter there are currently two positions vacant on the SCEC Board. These two positions are .appointed positions which represent the private sector of_SCEC's Board composure. SCEC also has elected public officials (County Commissioners) who serve and persons representing low- income citizens make up one -third of the Board. It is the intent and hope that quite possibly you or a member of your board or council would be interested in serving on the SCEC Board. SCEC is a private non- profit social service agency basically serving Scott and Carver Counties, however SCEC does operate some programs outside the two county area. Programs which you may be familiar with that SCEC operates are C.E.T.A., Youth Community Conservation Improvement Project, Department of Energy Weatherization Program, Emergency Fuel Assistance, 70001 (a high school drop out program), Senior Nutrition (senior dining sites), Outreach and Assessment, !lead Start, Community Food F, Nutrition, Housing Program and many special demonstration type programs. All these programs are directed toward the economically disadvantaged. The SCEC Board is responsible for the planning, development and policy decisions for the successful implementation of the programs. It is an eighteen member Board and meets the 1st Tuesday (evening) of each month. I know that 1 have only covered the very basics about SCEC, however I hope that I have quite possibly initiated further interest on your part and if so I would like to further discuss the openings with any interested persons at their • w k Page 2 • convience. 1 can be reached at 448 -2302 or by dropping me a line at the Scott -. Carver Economic Council, 6th and Oak, Carver MN 55315. Thank you for your time and patience in reviewing this letter. Sincerely, • Jul41s n L. Kenyon • Executive Director JLK:pr • • • • • • • • • P 011 DATi. :: , ^ February 14, 1980 CASE: 1SO -1P ITEM: ' reliminary Plat, Macey Second Addition APPLICANT: City of Shakopee LOCATION: 4th Street and Minnesota • - -- . ZONING /LAND USE: R -2 Urban Res identinl /Resident. is l , Open Storage, Commercial AREA: 5.44 Acres APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Chapter 12, SUhd ivi s i on Regulations; Section 11.2.6, Land Use Regulations PUBLIC HEARING CASE HEARD BY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL WILL HEAR THIS CASE ON: March 4, 1980 PROPOSAL: The City of Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority is requesting approval_ of a preliminary plat in order to re- plat 22 residential lots. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY: Surrounding Land Uses: North - R -2 /Single family residential South - R -2 /Abandoned rail line, vacant East - R -4 /Duplexes West - R -2 /Vacant, single family home Land Use Plan: Low density residential. URBAN SERVICES AVAILABILITY: Sanitary Sewer: Lateral extension to be constructed on Minnesota St. Storm Sewer: Drain to sewer on Fourth St. Water: Extension to be constructed on Minnesota Street. Parks: Hiawatha Park 1/4 mile Transit: MTC 1/4 mile PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The proposed plat is consistent with the Land Use Plan. 2. The plat consists of 22 residential lots and an outlot. Outlot A is being platted As an nit :lot in order to keep options open for the maximum utility of the property fronting on Market Street. If the property were platted hak - O - Valle Amateur _ y Hockey Inc Building Fund. Campaign a■ P.O. E3ox'200 Shakopee, MN 55379 ;+.✓ .i �'•I It:. I Y . es ti h '4 � n - • • • JAN3 1 1,);11: CITY OF SHAKOPEE January 31, 1980 • Honorable Mayor and Council Members: The Shak -O- Valley Amateur Hockey Association Building bland Campaign Committee requests your approval to construct an • ice arena on city property. The location of this property is across from the city swimming pool approximately where the present out -door hockey rink is now located. The Campaign Committee requests use of this land until the arena is complete and debt free at which time it will be turned over to the city. We will submit all plans for your evaluation and approval. We would appreciate tentative approval at this meeting.. We also request that one member of the Council be appointed to serve on the Ice Arena Committee. Thank you for. your consideration. • -• Representing Ice Arena. Building Committee Clint Hammer • Chuck Kreuser • • • 2 ,.� Sh.ak -O- Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc. . Building Fund Campaign P.P. Box 200 Shakopee, MN 55379 • PROJECTED HOURS OPERATION - 6 months - October to•March 31st October • Hours Weekdays 3:30 to 10:45 138 Weekends 7:30 am to 10:30 pm 104 2-+2 November Weekdays 2:30 pm to 11:00 pm 126 Weekends 7:30 am to 10:30 pm 282 Dec ember 307 Hours January 271 Hours February • 244 Hours March 277 Hours . Total 1623 Hours 1,623 Hours at $50.00 per hour = $81,1500.00 This is an estimated projection but will give some idea of available ice. • k'4; , m / • z , Volunteers lend a hand for ice arena . - g A few supporter of the Shak-O. According to Clint Hammer, were obtained from the arena Saturday. It took the men until elation still hoped 4e complete Its ...,.. ,.. Valley Amateur Hockey through midnight Saturday before the fund•rahing activities this autumn s • 1 " - r • tion found out last wee Aaaocla• association epokeaman, Madison, weekend Just Wis., meatpacker Steve Badallch The abother art e cost of D the y second -hand equipment was removed and load- and begin work on the arena 1 how hard it is to dismantle an Ice offered to donate the Ice refrlgera• equipment ran around $20,000, ed on a semitrailer, a 40-foot building. However, U the. rune- .arena. tion equipment from the five -year- about one -tenth of what It might flatbed trailer and two 20 -foot box raising Is not completed until later y' fK , .. '.. The men spent a total of 1 old bankrupt arena if the Shakopee have cost flew. trucks. this year, construction would begin r couple days In Schaumberg, 111„ group would pull it from the Most of the Shakopee volunteers All of the equipment, except for next spring. where they took apart the interior suburban Chicago site. The other drove down to Schaumberg lest the refrigeration units and fans on Most of the donations to the of the defunct Northwest Ice Arena equipment, which included Wes- Thursday night and began work at the 40 -foot flatbed, was brought to project have come from local • for transport of Shakopee and chers, infra -red beaters, dashers 0 am. Friday, said Jim Hoey. The Shakopee Sunday. How said two Individuals and businesses and n Installation In the proposed Shake- with plezlgtas, a skateaharpener, work conUnued until 10 pm. Fri. men would return to Schaumberg total about hall of the $500,000 pee Ice Arena. • scoreboard and sound system also day end resumed about 0 :30 e.m, this weekend for that remaining originally sought for the protect. load. That $500,000 was set as the goal "The equipment is In good Defore the association located and shape and we took everything out obtained the equipment at to • '" - of the inside of the arena that we reduced price. could," Hoey said. "About the only Along with Hammer and Hoey, . . thing we need now for the inside of the following volunteers aided le the wrong is the Lambohl, the the work utSchaumber8 last week- j mapoe hlne e ic use . to Wemea'tre . and r .e.atesur- end: Kevin Map+ke, Doug Fess, h ek p Tom Kogeq.lohn Collins, BW Witt, , looking a Ic." Chuck Er hU Heapenheide, Al Earth, B�gis Bob Scheel- Bad gft of Chica i ce Hameraealdtbahoctwaur deraadGeneH.naes. . boo build g effort . Ic pledg arena . A group of Shakopee w party. Hammer said he was ncour- nears halfway point . head Into suburban ChicaI W es no b Ibis ' Hammer estimated the coat of aged by the latest developments .. weekend to disauemble and track the secondhand equipment would contained in the Badallch gift and back equipment from a bankrupt nor to the range of $20,000. If the the additional low -coat interior lea arena that wW ald the drive In local arena enthusiasts were to equipment. Fundraising Is going well for An ice arena steering commit. bulding a local lee facility. purchase the equipment new, the Persons who might be interest- the proposed Shakopee Ice Arena, tee Is in the process of being Cunt Hammer, spokesman for coat could range as high as ed to misting the volunteers in according to the latest report from named, Hammer aaid.Wben the the Shak-O-Valley Amateur Heck- $240,000. their removal of the equipment the Shak O- Valley ' Amateur committee is completed, It will ey AsaoclaUoa, Inc., geld the volun- • Such a savings, Hammer mild, from the suburban Chicago site Hockey Association, with nearly. oversee all expenditures for the teens would be workng to remove would be • boost for the Ice arena should contact the local fund- half of the necessary money arena, secure the lease for land the lee refrigeration equipment fund - raising effort which currently raking office immediately at 115- pledged. near Sweeney School from the city and portions of the Interior from . Is hovering around hallway on its 7912, Hammer said, Especially According to association official and work with the building corn- • the Northwest !n Arena for reps,. = attempts to reach, the original total needed are a truck driver, an Clint Hammer, the fund is mittee to erect the structure, in Shakopee. of $500,000. enclosed trailer tractor and other approaching 50 percent of the goal Hammer said the association. According to Hammer, Mad- volunteers to help with the dlsas• of between $500,000 and $000,000. . still hopes to get the building up leen Wis., aaatpapeker Steve Bed• However, Hammer explained, aembling. The funds to date have been this year, but added be did not aleh has offered to donate the lee • the coat ,savings which will be gathered mainly from local real• know how soon the structure would refrigeration equipment from the , , realised from purchasing the In another matter concerning dents and businesses with corner. be ready for skating. hr flue -year-old neence.adul arena Northwest Ice Arena equipment, the arena, Hammer said local ale and foundation gilts expected Although professional fund- which 1341 purchased earlier if the could help the association to bring arena oUIclais are working with in the next few weeks a boards of raiser Al Finkle has left Shakopee group would remove It from Its the cal of the overall project to city officials to arrange a (ease directors gather for autumn meet• after his 12.week assistance, the current home. Other equ1pmeet closer to $400,000. Included In that agreement *tub as bleachers, dashers with . revised total 4 $372,000 for the +Ice • It is the (or lokthe nl of south the a Shakopee Inds. group's .[Ilea remains open from mateur plexlgiss, oli hire fed baton, a building to be constructed on a site hakes association to turn the "The 'people' part of this giving about 9:50 to 11 a.m. and frets $tat. -afro Skate-sharpener, scoreboard and near Sweeney Elementar Sebool arena over to the city when the has been terrific," Hammer said. about 1:30 to phone p.m., 'Hammer r0 Elementary "We were "looking for around said. The phone number at the wound um= from the arena • and the 30,000 in refrigeration and project is completely paid for In $ lg $200,000 from buai Woes and hail• office, at 121 S. Holmes, 4 NS -7992; would be purchased from second ' interior equlpmeat. three years, viduais In Shakopee. We're close to that." . • Fiv cities pass the • 9.ctlon t /h9. / /whek Valley Nswdacn War 3.1171 • E itorial Opinion hat t0 b uHd . . ..„ . d ice ar enas Bond issues fa in referendums .. •• A ded effort • " .By Guy Litanies 1977 and raised $370,000. Crookston 3250.000. not yet enough for an are - 1 - - . Blatt Writer J , bout .130 by23Flool arena, which na. ' There a e group of people working diffidently in this town who are opened In 107tl. - • . • Voters In Hutchinson, Minn., reject. High school hockey teams, youa c eserving of some public recognition. for their efforts, ed a referendum for a $300,00n White voters across the nation reject hockey leagues and recreational . uwtmmteg pool In 1973 and another school bonds, residents of five small skaters use the arenas In the five Members of the Shuk- O -VaUey Amateur Hockey Association, Inc, • fora 5334,000 skating rink k 1975. Minnesota communities have donat- cities that leave constructed them. and their supporters ere buddinb a fundraising drive to privately finance • . ed "12.2 million In cash and almost The Alexandria. Buffalo and Hutch- an indoor ice erena that would be built on a site near Sweeney "We said, 'Forget you. We're going to 1300,000 In labor and materials to Inson arenas double u civic centers Elementary School. The ice enthuaasta are workalg to cove the cost of go to the people willing to contrib. build Ice arenas since 1975. Meson- for trade shows and other events. the arena the . ate.'" said Curt Bradford, s local drla's 9,800 residents gave $500,000 Brainerd and Crookston are collect- • o ugh private donations rather than going through the public Realtor end attorney. after voting down a 8300,000 arena Ing more donations so their arenas - funding route, In 1974. Brainerd. population 11,600, can be used as civic centers. Bradford, restaurateur Dick Lenz donated $478.000 for a similar pro. , The fundraisers indicate their drive is right around halfway and tarm•macklaery dealer Emmett ject. and Buffalos are • 1,100 residents - The Brainerd and Buffalo arenas a towards the 0500,000 originally projected la the arena. Most of that has McCormick appealed to the loves contributed $310,000 for an arena In run by private directors other , but oer 9 coma in donations Iron individuals, (smiles and local businesses who , residents for demotions to build that city. completed facilities were donated to an ice area. A 11•wak Ned drive municipal governments to operate. are pledging amounts over a three•yar penod. Major foundation and - beginning April 1, 1078, raised Among these cities, only Alexan- Most are operated at a profit or at a ' corporate donors currently ere studying the association's proposal for 8515,000, and a 130-by.240 -foot 'retie dries city council contributed large small loss, action in the next few weeks. opened In 1977. sums of money, passing a $300,000 - - bond Issue. Some of the other gov Those Involved say It often is easter • The association not only has tenacious hand =natsers. Iho members la Crookston, voters rejected a ernments donated land, however. to get donations for arenas than II Is are using thee u well. 71ri. weekend, a SI.5.mllilon bond- Issue for • pool to gel votes for school bond issues to ng tngenwlµ group of volunteers is and ice arena la 1975. Ward. Dreshman and Reinhardt Inc., build arenas. There are many rot• journeying to Chicago to pull i p the refrigeration equipment and interior fund misers from Worteingta, Ohio, sons: - from a defunct,' five-year old suburban arena, The refrigeration ' "1 just decided. 'Let's quit talking— directed each fund drive. The firm equipment is being donated by a Madison, Wis„ meatpacker and the . Let's do something, '• said Joe also bed less successful drives In • Donations ere deductable on in- . . total cost of the equipment is expected 10 come in around $20,000, French, a local l fertilizer anufac• Willmar and Eden Prairie; when come taxes. School bonds Increase rather than anywhere from eight to 12 limes that amount later. French and a committee asp. lease efforts ailed, the clues passed taxes. , pealed to Crookstoa's 9000 residents referendums to build arenas. A drive " ' during a two-mooth campaign le In Skopee so tar hat continued on raised about ti page 5D We commend this organization for its efforts. They are attempting es leg - to create a facility which they strongly believe wilt be for the betterment - - of the community. • Donations usually ere made by During that vmd. the resident asked and Shakopee. He sant that when cilium who use the arena or who for the donation. Sharp sold. - larger donors contribute, smaller do- believe it will benefit the comment. nors usually follow, lee wen hi* ty. A school bond taxes users of the "I1 wouldn't be effective from me," • wren. and nonusers alike - said Sharp, who speaks with o soft Auer 0:5 benefactors were asp. I am sure most people . are It would be very easy sit • back drawl end was well liked in Meson- proached, persistent, well•organlzed ware that a committee 1 area. now and say, "Shakopee didn't ba k • Under the plan developed by the dria. often being invited to dinner at committees contacted other poten. aware that working very area ea help nd , why "Souk we help Ohio fund raters. neighbors appeal the country club and In residents' teal donors. In Hutchinson. 466 pea toward the goal k funding a Scott Them "' D potential donors for money. homes. Were outsiders. We come pie pledged amounts from SS to 8 8 Neighbors seldom appeal to voters la In for a short period and were gone 075,000 County Indoor Ice Arena In Shako- ' Hey, people, to costa are going support a school bond. These people the here. They're go- pee, - up very lad. I thlak we all agree• ing to be using the facility," . Ward, Dreshman and Reinhardt usu. The project must be fundd ed by we need 1 tacWty such as this In • Donated arenas frequently cost any charged less than 5 percent of private roec d ust be f by Ind!. Scott County. The ume to do less than those built Ihtough school The appeal for money specified that the money donated, plus expenses. priv priv and businesses. When It is something about It a sew. A wail bonds because bonds often Include the arena would help local people. In completed, It will be turned over and see attitude Is a guarantee of • money for other projects. boosters sir for example. arena enthused more 1 tun about It me more D boostes stressed that hockey play. enthused 1 get," said Michael Wle• to the city for operation by them as failure. Face It, U the project does a municipally operated. and there- not go ahead, no one will come to "Add t have to add surnaming," said travel to distant towns for games h en, on Aleknndna banker who D y p you to collect your pledge, se all - Du Wayne Peterson, a 000 pr accountant and practices could be unsafe and helped lead Inc arena drive here ., by non•taxed facility. who contributed to the Hutchinson unhealthy. said Allan Finkle, a fund "Every day I go by the arena- 1 walk you are out is the camp It cat you arena. it was fun. We got to see peo- raiser from Syracuse, N.Y. In and it's such a Omit It's a feeling The uses and benefits of such a k mall It In to the Pont Office Box pis talking about one project and not of pride to see what a community • facility extend far beyond the ice , Shakopee! If it goes ahead, you ns argument. 11 won't a "Our high school ream was rad " lc- can do if people get behind u1. y getting Into ea a D hockey interests and ladtide such have the option of spreading your matter of not contributing. It was a Inset Litchfield:' Bradford said. activities as family skating, curl- tax deductible contribution out matter of how much." "We'd leave at 10 p.m. Then Me kids •'I wouldn't wont to give any commit. mg, broombballall, i ndoor tennis, over three years. Moat Important, would come back and shower. We n1ty the impression that Ms a patsy" archery, , and means, you will have had a part In Ward, Dreshman and Reinhardt had kids whose grades were going saki Don Peterson, a funeral duce - achemore. providing a desperately needed helped develop Bud unity. The firm down. It's 22 miles each way " for who led Inc Buffalo arena drive you know, a group of Prior facility for our area. her raised more than S3 billion since and Is the unsalaried manager of the As yo Lake residents a arkro very of Prior - 1900; said Donald R. Hannum, chair. The fund raiser's role In the appeal arena. inc "' given five years of m. to achieve nstsucha project about The time is now, people. Let's man of the board. it raised more was to talk about the arena's cost, sense effort to It. I mink mere her to J D j pull logelber and ;bow cur kids than 565 million In 1975. Sharp said. "and about what kind of be somebody willing 10 do that. two years ago and fell short of that they are more Important to as . gift we would need from him (Inc 1 reaching the geal. Many people than are past differences o! One of me hem's fund raisers, J.E. donor) to have a successful cam. "em I can go home on a legendry --v and businesses held op on their opinloa (Corky) Sharp of Clinton. Mks., woo palgn" night and probably have had 1,000 ry _" pledges is "see how It was going" retold money for Alexandria and Inds under N use Inc facility That's SW before they committed themselves. Shsaaatt Brabant described u typical one In Hutchinson, five businesses where you get your lift That's worth • r AS • member of that committee Prier Lake visit 10 a Mlmmota town. Sae said pledged $199,000 of the 5545.0110 more than pay," l''.; who put many hours al effort into site W studied its financial sea naiad. - the "Prior Lake Arena, It was a and accoropanied a resident a sat bitter pill to swallow when we the Weise potential donor for a cos- "They 051.011311 a pattern M giving' called It quits. trlbi+oa tor other people," said Finkle, who worked In Crookston, Hutchinson a it r - INTRODUCTION There is an attempt underway in the community whereby the Shakopee Ice Hockey Association intends to conduct a fund - raising campaign to garner sufficient funds to construct an indoor ice arena. This is planned to commence within the next month (June 4 to be exact). The Ice Hockey Association hopes to completely finish the arena within a three year time period. One plan of action the Ice Hockey Association is entertaining involves the construction and operation of the ice arena for three seasons and then turning ownership of the facility over to the City of Shakopee for a nominal price. Another avenue open to the local hockey association is to retain ownership of the facility indefinitely. Buying land from the school district and building an arena on school property is a third alternative, while the fourth option entails the associations purchase of private land and building the facility on this land. This arena is planned to be constructed on the site where the present public outdoor rink is situated in Lions Park. The City would donate the site to the association. ._Details involving site improvements such as parking facilities plus land costs such as sewer and water extensions and hook -ups have not been decided as of yet. The report which follows includes an investigation of five ice arenas focusing on the operation of these five arenas. Hutchinson's Civic Arena, Farmington's Municipal Arena, Apple Valley's Sports Arena, Burnsvill.e's Ice Arena and Hastings' Civic Arena are the five arenas scrutinized in this report. . Reasons are varied for selecting these arenas from a myriad of ice arenas located throughout the state. One reason involves the Shakopee Ice Hockey Association's intentions of constructing a building similar to that of Farmington's and designing the interior of the facility like that of Hutchinson's. The ice making equipment found in the Farmington Municipal Arena is favored by the Shakopee association, while Hutchinson's arena was built by funds garnered by a fund - raising campaign very similar to that planned by the local ice hockey association. Finally, each of the five arenas (Especially Apple Valley, Hastings, Farmington and Burnsville) selected to be investigated in this report are located near the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, just as is Shakopee. The business and community climate they exist in is very similar to that found in Shakopee. • A -2- Hutchinson's arena and Farmington's arena were personally visited by several City staff members while telephone conversations with the managers of Hastings Arena, Apple Valley's arena, and Burnsville's arena accumulated much of the general information and management insights found in this report. Budget and operating information was gathered from actual financial records provided by the management of three ice arenas - Farmington, Hutchinson and Hastings. General budget information on Burnsville's arena and Apple Valley's arena was collected from telephone conversations with the arena managers. • • -3- THE HUTCHINSON CIVIC ARENA Employees Manager The manager of the Ice Arena also serves as the manager of the Municipal Liquor Store. His annual salary is $19,000 with one -third or $6,000 budgeted to the ice arena. Arena Superintendent The Arena Superintendent receives an annual salary of $11,400. This individual graduated from the Dakota County Technical Institute which offers a degree in Arena Management and Maintenance. The Arena Superintendent works in the arena the entire year and is responsible mainly for maintenance of the facility. Part -Time Help The Hutchinson Ice Arena has utilized CETA employees and work study students from the Hutchinson Area Vocational Institute to assist during the ice season. Under the work study program, the City pays for 20% of the workers wages with either the state or federal governments paying the balance. The Area Vocational Institute and CETA employees are paid the prevailing minimum wage. It should be noted that the CETA program terminates this September. When weekend tournaments are in full swing, three employees are on duty during any one period of the tournament. The operation of the ice arena is entirely divorced from the City's Recreation Department. Physical Characteristics of the Arena • Hutchinson's ice arena is 135' by 235' with a ceiling height of 28'. Concrete blocks ten to twelve feet in height constitute the walls while the roof is constructed of steel. The arena manager acknowledges that the ceiling could be slightly higher to facilitate "broomball activities. Bleachers capable of seating 2000- 2500'persons are offset to one side of the arena. These bleachers are set above the lockerrooms, restrooms and storage areas for the ice surfacing machine. This number. of bleachers, the manager admitted, is not necessary since an average high school game draws about 700 persons. Week-end tournaments may attract a greater number of persons, perhaps up to 1200 1500.• 7 -4- Four locker rooms are found in the Hutchinson Ice Arena - two complete with full shower facilities for high school teams and two smaller rooms to provide dressing areas for youth hockey teams. A small area allows the local high school coach to maintain an office while simultaneously providing space for referees quarters and an emergency, treatment center. An arena office and concession stand -ice rental room are located near the front entrance of the building. Direct access between the two rooms is not provided and this design convenience would save wasted time and energy according to the ice arena manager. At the end of the arena opposite the entranceway is a large overhead door which permits the ice surfacing machine an exit to the outside while at the same time allowing an entranceway for vehicles. This is imperative for maintenance reasons and the use of the arena for other functions such as auto shows. After two complete winters, foundation problems are developing near the entranceway of the building. Adequate soil tests combined with competent construction practices should be assured when under- taking a project such as an ice arena. A sprinkler system was installed at the time of construction in 1976 at a cost of $18,000. The sprinkler system was not a budgeted construction expenditure. It was, however, required by the City Building Inspector. Construction Costs Construction of the Hutchinson Arena began in 1976. Approximately $475,000 covered the cost of the structure plus all fixtures. A more specified breakdown of costs follows: $420,000 - included building, refrigeration system, locker room equipment, lights, heating system, etc. $ 45,000 - included bleachers, boards, scoreboard, sound system, zamboni, etc. $ 10,000 - included contingency costs. $475,000 It should be noted that the $45,000 expenditure for bleachers, boards, etc. was an extremely economical purchase. A hockey arena in North Minneapolis was terminating operation during the time the Hutchinson arena was under construction and this equipment was bought at bargain prices, to'say the least. Duplicating a similar purchase would be extremely difficult. • • -5- The zamboni (ice surfacing machine) was purchased second -hand from the North Minneapolis Arena mentioned earlier as part of the $45,000 used equipment purchase transaction. This zamboni, however, has since expended its usefulness. The City of Hutchinson has priced several makers of zamboni's and has discovered that the cost lies in the $20,000 to $22,000 range. • It is recommended that any ice equipment (including the refrigeration system and zamboni) that will be part of an arena operation turned over to the City of Shakopee be purchased new and from a reputable firm. Other fixtures, such as bleachers, boards, sound system, score- board, etc. are urged to be purchased used providing, of course, that this equipment is in satisfactory condition and the prices are competitive. The construction cost of $475,000 should be kept in perspective not only in light of the bargain transaction regarding the fixture purchases, but also that construction had taken place in 1976. Increased costs have inflated this cost and the Hutchinson Civic Arena manager estimates that to build a similar structure in 1979, $800,000 to $1,000,000 would be needed. The valuation of the Civic Arena is expected to be $1,000,000 when the building is debt free. Method of Financing Construction Contributions and pledges by.local businesses and individuals financed the construction of the arena. A professional fund - raiser, the same 'Individual that the Shakopee Ice Hockey Association has engaged, was hired by the Hutchinson Hockey Association to conduct the fund raising campaign. Contributions and pledges were arranged to be paid in installments up to three years, if so desired. As of April, 1979, payment of final 3 -year installments were anxiously expected so that final construction costs could be closed. Ice Making Equipment The Hutchinson Civic Arena contains the same ice making equipment as the Hastings Civic Ice Arena.. (Please refer to page 4 of the "Energy Comparison Study" attached to this report). In order to avoid undue repetition, further discussion of the ice making equipment will not appear here. A necessary point will be noted . at this time,' however, regarding the preference of the City as to the selection of a type of ice making equipment. It is recommended that • • -6- the direct refrigeration ice making system employed in the Farmington Arena be used in a Shakopee Ice Arena. For reasons of energy savings, ice making efficiency, maintenance reliability and anticipated life of equipment, the direct refrigeration ice making system is preferred over the primary /secondary type refrigeration system. Hours of Operation During the Ice Season In operation for ice activities, the Hutchinson Ice Arena operates from approximately November 1 to March 15. During the ice season, the arena is fully scheduled for ice time from 3 p.m. to 10:30 - 11:00 p.m. Saturday's schedule is from 8:00 a.m. to 11 :00 p.m. while on Sundays the ice arena opens at noon (unless a hockey tournament is scheduled, then it opens at 8 :00 a.m.) and closes between 10 :00 and 11:00 p.m. Use of Arena During the Ice Season A breakdown of the use of the facility follows in scheduling priority order: 1. Hutchinson High School 2. Hutchinson Youth Hockey 3. Local Mens Broomball League 4. Ice Rental for Various Groups * 5. Open Skating * Includes ice rental income received from a number of church groups, 3M Club, Girl Scouts, out of town hockey teams, Hutch Merchants Hockey Team and broomball practice sessions. The ice rental schedule is $45 per hour during prime demand time (3 p.m. to 10 p.m.) and $35 per hour after 10 p.m. and weekend mornings. Hutchinson High School signed a $9000 contract with the ice arena for the 1978 -1979 school year which entitles them to 240 hours of ice time plus 40 hours of free ice time (e.g. tennis, indoor track, physical education classes, etc.) In part for this slightly reduced hourly rental rate $37.50) the High School has pledged $8000 toward the purchase of a new zamboni (ice surfacing machine). The Youth Hockey Association rents the arena for $4500 per season for practices and games. This rate is substantially reduced; the City feels that giving the association a break is justified since it garnered the pledges to construct the facility and it volunteered numerous hours of labor in operating the arena. This work involved erecting the bleachers and hockey boards before the season opened, ticket takers and ticket sellers for all activities (including High School games), scoreboard operators and all concession stand help. Money from the associations percentage of the net revenues from concessions are turned back into buying ice time for the youth hockey teams. In addition, the youth hockey association rents the arena -7- for tournaments at a rate of $40.00 an hour. Four tournaments were held this past winter involving 60 -80 hours of ice time rental. A total of 224 hours were reserved for open skating in 1977 -78. Prices charged during these hours were $1.00 for adults, $.50 for High • School ages and younger and $.25 for skate rentals. Open skating was usually reserved in two to three hour blocks of time. • When scheduling ice time, priorities must be made and committments must be honored. Scheduling of priorities is a very important aspect and should be treated as such. This fact should be kept in mind when and if a Shakopee ice arena begins operation. Off - Season Activities During the off - season, the high school rents the arena for physical education and sports (tennis & track) activities. A circus is held in the arena anually, as well as several music concerts which, according to the arena manager, were not very successful. (Competition from other facilities, high school, armory, etc. account for the decreased-off-season demand for the arena). Other annual attractions in the arena include an auto show and a builders show. Approximately $4000 in 1978 was garnered in the form of rents from off - season promotions. Revenues Actual revenues totaled $54,003.12 in 1978. A more specific breakdown "of revenue sources is available, however, following is a list of revenues as outlined in the sections of this report under the headings of Use of Arena During the Ice Season and Off- Season Activities: High School Contract $9000 Youth Hockey 4500 2 y Youth Hockey Tournaments(80 hours 0 $40)3200 Is Mens Broomball League 1500 *Advertising (approximately) 10000 Off- Season Promotions 4000 $ 32200 *Advertising signs are hung upon one wall for a rental price. The ice arena manager estimates that $10,000 is collected from this source annually. The difference of $21,803.12 ($54,003.12 - $32,200) is made up of revenues from open skating, concessions, vending receipts and rental of ice time to various groups at the $45 per hour rate. • • . . . -8- ` Expenditures Following is a budget of expenditures for the Hutchinson Civic Arena showing, by object description, 1977 -1978 actual expenditures and the 1979 amounts adopted by the City Council: BUDGET OF EXPENDITURES, HUTCHINSON CIVIC ARENA 1977 1978 1978 1979 OBJECT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL APPROPRIATED ACTUAL COUNCIL Wages - Regular 9,995 12,000 13,899.81 18,100 Wages - Overtime - - 181.50 - Wages - Temporary 3,423 10,000 3,580.90 9,000 Wages - Temp. Overtime - - 12.19 - Vacation Pay - - 304.00 - Holiday Pay - - 646.76 - Sick Pay - - 336.30 - PERA - - 1,216.48 .745 FICA (City Portion) - - 727.35 797 Health & Insurance - - 586.29 1,143 Total Personal Services $13,418 $22,000 $21,491.58 $29,785 Supplies,Repair, & Maintenance Office Supplies 159 150 43.13 50 Operating Supplies 6,090 . ' 5,000 538.93 - Motor Fugl & Lubricant 207 400 446.39 400 Cleaning Supplies - - 2.00 50 Shop Materials - - 119.17 100 Food (Concessions) - - 7,074.56 6,000 Repair & Maint. Supply. 3,072 1,000 3,085.52 3,500 Equipment Parts - - 97.86 40 Building Repairs - - 2,894.59 500 Sign & Stripping Material - - 302.93 - Utility Maint. Supply - - 24.45 25 Small Tools 1,041 500 59.83 100 Utility System Maint. - - 101.40 - Total Supplies, Repair and Maintenance $10,569 $7,050 $14,790.76 $10,765 - -9- Expenditures Cont. 1977 1978 1978 1979 OBJECT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL APPROPRIATED ACTUAL COUNCIL Other Services and Charges Other Contracts 1,252 350 131.00 50 Communications 344 400 271.91 200 Postage - 50.00 75 Travel,School,Confernece 289 200 80.90 120 Car - - 16.00 - Advertising - - 1,146.70 1,000 Printing & Publishing 571 750 190.92 100 Utilities 6,997 8,000 16,441.75 14,000 Contracts,Repair &Maint. 1,533 1 1,015.41 - Total Other Services and Charges $10,986 $11,200 $19,344.59 $15,545 Miscellaneous Dues and Subscriptions 125 50 41.75 50 Capital Outlay Improvements other than Building 12,566 2,000 - 500 Machinery & Equipment 16,104 - 397.88 400 Furniture and Fixtures - - 773.00 - Total Capital Outlay $28,670 $2,000 $1,170.88 $ 900 1 TOTAL AMOUNTS $63,768 $42,300 $56,839.56 $57,045 • • 2 45t " - -10- Comparing the arenas revenues in 1978 of $54,003.12 to its 1978 actual expenditures of $56,839.56 shows an operating deficit of $2,836.44. Considering the well managed operation of this arena (a concensus of the Shakopee City Administrator and Administrative Assistant), it should be noted that ice arenas generally operate with a deficit. Several comments should be noted regarding the budget of the Hutchinson Civic Arena. As mentioned earlier, one -third or roughly $6,000 of the arena manager's $19,000 annual salary is budgeted toward the arena, the balance is budgeted toward the municipal liquor store. • CETA employees and work study students from the Hutchinson Area Vocational Institute are utilized by the arena and this approach significantly reduces the expenditures for wages. Funds for the CETA program are planned to be reduced this fall and guidelines to the program are becoming more restrictive as to the type of jobs eligible for the program (indications are that jobs which do not train individuals for a career position will be phased out of the program.) In addition, the availability of CETA employees is not always known. Another budget item which should be scrutinized concerns utility costs. As evidenced by the budget, the Hutchinson Civic Arena had utility costs of $16,441.75. This amount is significant when compared with the 1978 appropriated amount ($8000). The Civic Arena manager estimates that utility expenses necessary to operate the ice making equipment, lights, heaters and water heaters amount to roughly $100 per day. This fact should be acknowledged and more importantly, one should remember that energy costs are rising daily. Other Costs to the City The City of Hutchinson orginally paved the parking lot adjacent to the Civic Arena. Snow plowing of the lot and mowing of the grass encompassing the arena are also performed by the City. Neither of these two costs are reflected in the arena's budget. Insurance for the structure is covered by the City's blanket insurance policy and this cost likewise is not shown in the arena's budget. Water is supplied from City water mains and these costs are absorbed by the City of Hutchinson. Considering these costs not in their budget, it may very well cost an additional $10,000 - $15,000 ($67,000 to $72,000 in expenditures) to operate the Hutchinson Civic Arena. Z -11- FARMINGTON MUNICIPAL ARENA Employees Manager The manager of the Farmington Municipal Arena is also the Head of the City's Park and Recreation Department. His monthly salary is $1450. This amount will increase to $1800 per month the next budget year. Assistants Two persons assist the manager in operating the municipal arena. As with the manager, these two full -time employees also'work in the City's Park and Recreation department. One assistant, Recreation Technician III, receives $7.02 while the other assistant, Recreation Technician II, receives $5:08 per hour. Part = Time Help Farmington's Municipal Arena utilizes part -time CETA help in its operation as well as employing several other persons to serve as ticket sellers, ticket takers and scoreboard operators during games. Again, it should be noted that the CETA program will be undergoing changes in its guidelines and funding this fall. The salaries of the manager and the two assistants are budgeted 50% toward the arena and 50% toward the parks and recreation depart- ment. Any routine maintenance matters can be handled by the regular employees. If the need arises for major repairs regarding the refrigeration system, a company repairman is on call 24 hours a day at a rate of $50 per hour. During ordinary operation of the arena, one person is on duty. Special activities, such as tournaments or high school games, require that the manager, an assistant to operate the ice resurfacing machine, a ticket seller, a ticket taker and a scoreboard operator be on duty. Members of the police reserve act as security during hockey games. The concession stand is rented to the Farmington Ice Hockey Association; the City in return receives 25% of the gross sales. Volunteer help, to perform part -time duties, the manager informed Shakopee City staff members, fizzled out after the first year or two . of operation forcing the City to hire the part -time help mentioned above. A • -12- Physical Characteristics of the Municipal Arena • Farmingtorn,Municipal Arena is 240' x 120' with a ceiling height of 22 ° . Metal and pre -fab masonry compose the walls of the structure while the roof is insulated and of metal construction. It should be noted that the Shakopee Ice Hockey Association is planning to construct a building similar to Farmington's structure. Permanent bleachers capable of seating 500 persons line one side of the arena while the opposite is designed so that 500 portable bleachers (from the high school football field) can be moved into the arena. Located on the end of the arena where the entranceway is situated are the ice /refrigeration equipment room, a locker room complete with shower facilities, the zamboni storage room (equipped with a large overhead, door allowing ingress and egress to the building), another completely equipped locker room and the office which extends out towards the rink for a couple of feet. This arrangement of the office allows supervision of the entire premises. A series of vending machines line the entranceway opposite the office. Bathrooms complete the series of rooms in the arena. The concession stand is situated in the mezzanine which occupies the entire space above the series of rooms described above. No sprinkler system is found in the Farmington Municipal Arena. Construction Costs Construction of the arena began in 1975 and was completed in 1976. $670,000 was budgeted toward the construction of the Farmington Ice Arena and approximately $669,000 was expended on construction costs. Following is a rough breakdown of construction costs: $320,000 Shell of the structure $250,000 Ice making equipment, piping, cement floor, zamboni ($13,000), dasher boards with plexiglas $100,000 Interior finishing including locker rooms, office, bathrooms, etc. $670,000 Farmington also indicated that a significant amount of dollars should be calculated to serve as operating capital for the first year of operation. Depending on time of opening and breadth of operation, this figure could range from $15,000 to $25,000. • A 7GY -13- The City Manager estimates that to build a similar structure at todays inflated prices, $1 million would be needed. This figure could be shaved, perhaps to $800,000 if volunteer labor was utilized. (The $800,000 does not include parkirg costs). • Method of Financing General Obligation Bonds were issued by the City of Farmington to provide the $670,000 of construction funds. These bonds are to be paid back on a 10 year inflated basis with 30 year refinancing of approximately $550,000 to occur at that time. Ice Making Equipment Farmington's ice making equipment is fully described on page 4 of the attached "Energy Comparison Study ". Briefly, this system includes a primary system whereby direct circulation of refrigerant to steel pipe located in a concrete slab under the ice sheet. No secondary medium of refrigerant is used as in the primary /secondary system installed in the ice arenas of Hutchinson and Hastings. As evidenced by the "Energy Comparison Study ", the primary refrigerant system used by Farmington is substantially more efficient than the primary /secondary system installed in the Hutchinson or Hastings Arenas. A design element, however, necessary for the primary system requires subsoil compactment be done and a heating pad be installed in the soil beneath the concrete slab to avoid frost heaving of the concrete and rupturing of the refrigerant pipes. Since the Shakopee Ice Association favors this type of direct primary refrigerant system, care should be made that these design elements are followed to insure against costly repairs several years into the future. Hours of Operation During the Ice Season Farmington's arena opens in mid- October and closes about April 1. The normal weekday finds the arena in operation from 3:15 p.m. to 11:45 p.m. with one hour of figure skating and 12 hours of open skating interspersed throughout the week and weekends. The arena is open from approximately 7:00 a.m. to 11 -12 p.m. on weekends. Use of the Arena During the Ice Season Following is the 1978 -1979 breakdown of the use of the facility in scheduling priority order: 1. Farmington High School 100 hours practice time,40 hours game 2. Lakeville High School 100 hours practice, 40 hours game time • -14- 3. Prior Lake High School 20 hours practice, 32 hours game time • 4. Farmington Youth Hockey 220 hours 5. Lakeville• Youth Hockey 220 hours 6. Rosemount Youth Hockey 280 hours 1,052 total hours * * Does not include time for open skating or figure skating. The Farmington Municipal Arena charges a flat rate of $45 per hour for ice time and $35 per hour for times other than during regularly scheduled hours (before 3:00 p.m. and after 11:00 p.m.). No exemptions are made on this rate. In the case of the rental policy for high school games, the following arrangement is used: 4 hours of ice time @ $45 = $180 plus a flat rate of $65 or 65% of gate receipts, whichever is greater. For each high school hockey game the arena is assured of at least $245. The manager of the municipal arena stated arenas are business operations and should be treated as such. No rate reductions are given to anyone and active solicitation of paying customers for ice time is a high priority of the arena manager. This philosophy should be kept in mind in the instance of a Shakopee Arena. Off- Season Activities Off- season activities in the Farmington Municipal Arena are almost non - existent. The arena manages stated that Farmington was located too close to the Twin Cities. Shows, concerts and exhibits will not occur, he feels, in places such as Farmington because of the availability of facilities in the Twin Cities. A similar situation exists in the case of Shakopee. This point should be kept in mind when anticipating possible revenues from off - season activities in an arena. Revenues and Expenditures Following is the Farmington Municipal Arena Budget including receipts, expenses and net income for the years 1977 (actual), 1978 (budgeted), 1978 (actual)and 1979 adopted: • • • • -15- 1977 1978 1978 1979 • ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL ADOPTED Revenues Spectator Admission 5,600 5,900 4,952 7,340 Ice Rental 47,352 38,000 47,569 45,000 Merchandise Sales 2,281 2,500 2,879 4,000 Skate Sharpening 1,909 2,500 2,109 2,500 Vending Commissions 2,825 1,500 3,144 5,000 Advertising Fees - 500 - 700 Instructions 1,090 1,200 2,474 4,000 Concessions • 990 1,216 1,503 1,600 Miscellaneous 457 680 2,410 - Open Skating Admissions 1,060 1,500 1,000 Summer Activities 356 1,200 600 C.E.T.A. Reimbursement 885 10,708 4,778 5,934 TOTAL REVENUES 64,805 67,404 71,818 77,674 Expenditures Salaries 14,068 28,281 24,023 26,634 Employee Benefits 1,300 2,605 2,391 4,294 Utilities 13,556 20,000 13,738 19,950 Travel and Conferences 137 100 241 200 Maintenance of Bldgs & Equip 3,141 2,342 4,822 3,880 Professional Services • 1,300 2,000 825 2,400 Merchandise for Resale 1,367 1,000 2,745 2,000 General Supplies 1,806 1,500 1,570 2,985 Dues and Subscriptions - 25 - 160 Advertising - 200 - 250 Insurance 3,224 2,974 2,568 2,500 Miscellaneous 320 501 197 100 Sales Tax 300 • - - 400 Administrative Expenses - - 1,500 - TOTAL EXPENDITURES 40,820 64,808 54,620 67,753 TOTAL OPERATING INCOME 23,985 2,596 17,198 9,921 (Expend.). An operating income of $17,198 seems impressive on the surface, but many other factors are involved in the case of the Farmington Ice Arena. It should be remembered, however, that bond repayments of approximately $60,000 per year must be made on the municipal arena. As mentioned iin the discussion of the Hutchinson Civic Arena, CETA regulations and guidelines are expected to change this fall. Salary expenditures should likewise be discussed. 50% of the salaries of the regular employees are budgeted toward the arena while 50% of these salaries are budgeted toward the Parks and Recreation department. -16- Utility expenditures remain another cost which is important in the operation of an ice arena. Farmingtons actual utility costs were stable from 1977 to 1978, averaging roughly $13,500 for each year. This average compared,to the Hutchinson Civic Arena's utility expenditure of $16,441 in 1978, is dramatic considering that both arenas operated for about the same number of days in the year. An explaination for this fact may involve the difference in the ice making equipment used by each city. Farmingtons ice making equipment is much more energy efficient than that system used by Hutchinson. This comparison is outlined in the attached "Energy Comparison Study ". Keep in mind that Hutchinson employs the system found in the Hastings Arena. As stated earlier in the discussion of the Hutchinson Civic Arena, it is recommended that the Shakopee Ice Hockey Association select the direct primary circulation system similar to that of Farmington's Municipal Arena if the association should construct an ice arena. As a final note, a major price difference between the two types of systems does not exist. Other Costs to the City • The City of Farmington plows snow from the municipal arena's parking lot. Maintenance of the lot and possible future paving of the lot will be done by the City. A `t, • ' -17- HASTINGS CIVIC ARENA • Employees Manager The manager of the Hastings Civic Arena is employed full -time by the arena for the entire year. Salaries for the manager and the other employees reached $27,181 in 1978. Regular Employees One employee works full time in the arena and serves primarily as a maintenance person. This position has been filled by a CETA employee. (A full -time, year -round position such as this one would be eligible under the new CETA guidelines. Temporary positions, on the other hand, will be restricted). Temporary Employees One person is hired to work full time during the ice season • (October 1 to April 1). Physical Characteristics of Building Hastings Civic Ice Arena is 130' x 240' with a maximum roof height of 37'. The walls of the building are constructed of masonry while the roof is composed of laminated wood. An important aspect of this arena as opposed to the arenas of Hutchinson and Farmington alludes to the fact that Hastings Arena is not insulated. This condition contributes greatly to the exorbitant heating bills this arena incurs. This building, similar to the structure, does not contain a sprinkler system for fire control. Construction Cost Construction of the Hastings Civic Ice Arena was completed in December of 1974 at a final cost pf $730,000. No specific breakdown of costs is known at this time; however, the manager of the arena estimates that the ice making equipment together with the concrete slab cost $110,000 in 1974. The total construction cost includes all fixtures resulting in the finished product. Method of Financing The citizens of Hastings approved a referendum allowing the City to issue $560,000 of revenue bonds. The balance of the construction costs ($170,000).was obtained through federal revenue sharing funds. This source of federal funds, by the way, is no longer an active federal program. Ice Making Equipment Hastings ice making equipment was one of two systems under study in the "Energy Comparison Study" (please refer to page 4 of the attached study). • • • • • -18- Basically, this system is a primary /secondary circulation system whereby ' a prime solution is forced through the plastic pipes laying on top of the concrete mat and beneath the ice sheet. As the "Energy Study" exemplifies, this system is substantially less energy efficient than the direct primary system. Hours of Operation During the winter season (October 1 - April 1), the Hastings School District rents the arena in the morning and early afternoon. Ice time is sold from 3:00 p.m. to 10:30 - 11:00 p.m. Weekends find the arena in use from 8:00 a.m. to 10:30 - 11:00 p.m. Since the arena is not insulated, the arena is not used for any purpose in the off- season. Cooling costs would be too great considering the revenue off - season functions would generate. • Use of Arena During Ice Season Following is the list of uses in the Hastings Civic Ice arena in priority order: 1. Hastings High School 2. Red Wing High School 3. Hastings Youth Hockey Association 4. Red Wing Youth Hockey Association 5. Mendota, Inver Grove Heights, Youth Hockey Association The Hastings Civic Ice Arena charges a rental rate of $50 per hour for ice time. No discounts are given to. anyone. For high school games, the arena is leased for $275 for a two hour block of time. The high schools must also supply two game referees and all receipts are retained by the high school. Hastings and Red Wing high schools each paid between $7000 and $8000 for ice time this past hockey season. Hastings Youth Hockey Association bought about 270 hours worth of ice time while the other youth hockey associations listed above paid for lesser amounts of ice time. ' Revenues Following is a list of income for the Hastings arena for the years 1975 through 1978: CATEGORY 1975 1976 1977 1 Ice Rentals 9,189.24 3,642.50 2,661.50 3,518.00 Open Skati 4,320.55 4,785.50 6,128.00 3,608.75 Hardgood Sales 275.51 I 241.81 464.74 896.05 Acct Receivable 31,449.35 3,901.25 38,662.33 41,529.48 CD/ Skate Sharpening 1,856.70 2,031.00 2,069.65 1,755.00 Vending Receipts 1,997.44 ?,214.56 2,334.34 2,365.13 Skating Instr. 790.00 1,895.50 4,624.00 2,628.00 Hardgood Tax 10.92 9.52 12.54 24.57 • Concessions 4,498.29 4,473.31 3,696.70 2,981.15 TOTAL 54,387.80 56,194.95 60,653.80 54,306.14 A -i9- 2 C. A noticeable decline in receipts can be detected from the above figures. • Receipts for open skating, skating instruction and concessions are appreciably lower. This trend can be attributable to a decline in interest in skating in the community from the 1977 to 1978 season (primarily because outdoor rinks were in really good shape that year). The arena manager acknowledged that interest in open and figure skating fluctuates substantially each year. Expenditures Following is a list of expenses for the Hastings Civic Ice Arena by categories for the years 1975 through 1978: CATEGORY 1975 1976 1977 1978 Salaries - Regular 157556.09 12,955.04 1T:17.00 27,181.62 Salaries - Temporary 6,178.04 6,920.73 7,945.47 8,717.48 Telephone 641.96 489.08 528.38 556.04 Postage 50.00 7.50 6.00 20.93 Advertising 1,504.40 369.95 290.35 496.10 Printing 135.15 •237.80 270.07 117.50 Light & Power 18,297.93 16,879.10 17,623.17 16,112.12 Maint. Office Equip. 398.02 • 111.55 - 2,600.62 Maint. Misc. Equip. 595.98 3,718.91 3,946.46 '104.40 Heating 6,000.00 5,287.41 11,754.93 11,731.14 Rubbish Hauling 318.00 - - - Office Supplies 215.21 • 49.84 75.82 76.55 Janitorial Supplies 399.41 1,125.25 1;272.38 603.62 Equip. Parts, Acces. 900.60 2,189.07 2,025.48 2,567.23 Small Tools 1,702.78 84.97 156.69 307.79 Gasoline & Oil 524.55 397.07 435.03 936.84 Chemicals 564.82 1,117.01 97.77 281.91 Med. & First Aid 55.45 - 61.40 - Insurance - 3.00 33.00 - Rent Mach,. & Equip. 1,208.11 1.17.40 774.00 275.00 Sub & Memberships 66.00 25.00 125.00 183.00 Cost- Merchandise Sold 2,989.68 2,446.99 2,530.00 2,636.92 Refunds 80.00 11.25 46.00 295.00 Sales Tax 303.63 378.42 396.72 333.14 Bldg & Structure 1,548.15 - 5,784.88 - Furniture & Equip. 921.05 - - - Other Improvements 11,181.29 4,003.91 40.00 6,763.11 Machine & Equipment - - 4,272.00 2,510.37 Experts and Consultants - - 1,000.00 - Conferences and Schools - - - 144.00 Mileage - - - 431.29 TOTALS 72,136.30 59,226. 75,352.95 85,983.72 Most noteable costs involve salaries, light and power, and heating. The sudden jump in salary expenditures from $13,865 in 1977 to $27,181.62 in 1978 will be off -set by the replacing of the second full -time individual with a CETA employee. f . -20- • Exorbitant heating costs may be attributed to several factors. The lack of insulation in the ceiling in addition to the forced air concept of circulating heat plus the use of natural gas and propane gas as fuels all contribute in part to high heating expenditures. The Manager of Hastings Civic Ice Arena stated the light and power expenditures are as low as possible. The ice making equipment, given its primary /secondary circulation nature, is operating as efficiently as it can at this point. Reference should again be made to the "Energy Comparison Study" attached to this report, noting the real energy savings realized between the ice making system used by Farmington's arena to that utilized in the Hastings arena. Expenses and Income Following is a list of income compared to expenses for the years 1975 -1978: Income Expenses Net Loss 1975 $54,387.80 $72,136.30 $- 17,748.50 1976 56,194.95 59,226.25 . - 3,031.30 1977 60,653.80 75,352.95 - 14,699.15 1978 54,306.14 85,983.72 - 31,677.58 These figures speak for themselves. Care should be taken that a quality building is constructed by the Shakopee Ice Hockey Association to avoid some of the pitfalls experienced by the Hastings Arena (lack of insulation, primary/ secondary type ice making equipment, natural gas fuel, etc.). Other Costs to the City The Qiir of Hastings plows snow from and maintains the arena parking lot. Water is also supplied by the City. Insurance costs are covered by the City's insurance policy and the estimated $3,000.00 cost is not shown on the arena's budget. Although not associated to the City, the $13,000 purchase price of the zamboni (ice resurfacer machine) in 1975 was supplied by a local booster . club. n 0..' . -21- 4 . The information presented in this report to this point is summarized as • • follows: I HUTCHINSON FARMINGTON HASTINGS i 1. Employees - ;Manager -1 /3 of salary Manager Manager regular I budgeted to arena, Two Assistants Maintenance (CETA Arena Supervisor Budgeted 50% 50 Full time year -round I arena Part -time CETA and work study Three for games No Flnployee s . Temporary - Hill -time No Yes Volunteer Help Yes - heavily No - failed No 2. Physical 235' x 135' 240' x 120' 240' x 130' Characteristics 28' ceiling 22' ceiling 37' roof of Building 1 • 3. Seating . Capacity 12000 -2500 1000 700 4. Total„ ($475,000 completed $669,000 completed $730,000 completed Construction in 1976 in 1976 in December 1974 Cost (see report) 5. Sprinkler Yes ($18,000) No No System 1 6. Financing j Hockey Assoc. fund City issued $560,000 G.O. Bonds . raising campaign • $670,000 G.O. Bonds $170,000 Fed. Revenue 1 sharing Hinds 7. Ice Making j Primary /Secondary Direct primary iPrimary/secondary Equipment Circulation refrigerant • 8. Length of • Nov. 1 - March 15 Oct. 15 - April 1 Oct. 1 - April 1 Operation 9. Hours of 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. 3:15p.m. -11:45 p.m. 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. Operation 8 a.m. to 11 p.m. 7 a.m. - 11 p.m. 8 a.m. to 11 p.m. Prime Ice Time (weekends) (weekends) (weekends) 10. Priority of Hutch High School Farmington High School Hastings High School , Scheduling • Hutch Youth Hockey Lakeville High School Red Wing High School Broomball League Prior Lake High School Hastings Youth Hoelce3 Group ice rental (not next season) Red Wing Youth Hoc#ce3 Open & figure skate Farmington Youth Hockey Mendota, Inver GroyE . Lakeville Youth Hockey Youth Hockey • • Rosemount Youth Hockey Open & figure skatiTA Open and figure skate I7,000 11. Rental Rate $45 /hr prime time $45 /hr prime time $50 /hour , $35 /hr remainder $35/hr remainder 1 1. 12. Discount Youth Hockey & High No No School (see report) i A -22- 7 ``' HUTCHINSON FARMINGTON HASTINGS ' 13. Off Season • Concerts, Auto & Non- ead.stant ;None Activities boat shows, circust 1 !$4,000 in revenue • 14. Total 1978 i$54,003.12 $71,818.00 $54,30 • Revenue 1 C ern Ci 15. Total 1978 1$56,839.56 C 0 $54,620.00 $85,983.72 Expenditures 1 13 000 1 13 bit 16. Utitility 62 Light &Pow 1 F cpenditureb � $16,) i)�1.75 $13,738.00 $ 6 Li g h t & 1978 $29,37 i 17. Net Income or ;$- 2,836.44 $17,198.00 $- 31,677.5 Loss 1978 1 (debt service costs: (without debt service costs) 18. Other Costs :Initally paved Snow plowing. Snow plowing. Absorbed by City, parking Lot. • Maint. parking lot. Maint. parking lot mow plowing. 1 Future paving lot. Water. 'Insurance. I Water. Insurance. • 1 Local bank bought ' Local club purchased zamboni($21,000) zamboni in 1975 • Water. - ,($13,0 • • SAMPLE CONSTRUCTION BUDGET • Following is a sample construction budget derived from various sources of information. This budget in no uncertain terms is to be taken as exact; it is . merely a rough guideline. The final cost estimate should be in the range of the fund- raising goals of the Shakopee Ice Hockey Association and the fund- raising goal should be adequate to build a quality arena. 1. General Construction (structure /insulation) $370,000 2. Furnishings (dasher boards, scoreboard, sound system, 65,000 bleachers, construction of offices, locker rooms, etc.) 3. Electrical Work (Power, Lighting equipment and installation)40,-000 • 4. Mechanical Work (Plumbing, Heating, Ventilation Equipment 45,000 and Installation) 5. Ice System ( Equipment /Piping /Controls 145,000 6. Zamboni (Ice Surfacer) 20,000 • 7. Site Preparation (Digging, Grading, Fill) 75,000 TOTAL . $760,000 ' Items 1, 5, 6, totalling $535,000 were derived from actual cost benefits; items 1 and 5 from the ice hockey association and item 6 from the manager of Hutchinson ►s arena where a local bank recently purchased a zamboni for $21,000 plus. The cost estimate for item 2 is very conservative and this figure is relative to the availability of used equipment. Items 3 and 4 were derived from divided in half the estimates of the 1974 Municipal Ice Arena Feasibility Study beca}.se of (a) the extremely high estimated costs and (b) the use of volunteer labor the local hockey association wishes to utilize. In fact, all of these items are subject to change dependent on voluntary labor. Item 7 is a very conservative estimate again dependent on the availability of voluntary help. The total construction estimate does not include parking lot construction, sewer and water extensions and hook -up charges, building permit applications and operating capital for the first season of operation. These three costs could range from $150,000 to $200,000 or more. In discussing water availability to the arena site necessary for adequate fire protection with the City Engineer, the following estimates of costs were made: Auxilary power $5,000 Auxilary pump 5,000 $10,000 Extension of pipe from 10th Avenue' addition to this $10,000. • -24- 7Q • • It should be noted that the engineer estimated these costs without knowing the size of the structure, the building materials used or the availability of a • sprinkler system. This estimated cost for water availability may be low or high but this cost must be picked up by someone - the City or the ice hockey • association. • Voluntary help is an important labor saving device but it is not always dependable. A real concern of this staff member concerns the various cost cutting techniques which can be used in an instance such as the construction of this arena. It is hoped that quality does not suffer in attempting to reduce costs. The City will be closely following the construction of this arena (as it does with all construction within the City) to insure that too many cost - saving devices which will affect the quality of the facility will not be used. Operating Expenditures The total operating expenditures in 1978 of the three ice arenas studied in the preceeding report averaged $65,814. Utility costs averaged $15,089.88 for the Hutchinson and Farmington arenas, while light and power costs reached $17,623.17 and heating costs were $11,754.93 resulting in a total utility expenditure of $29,378.10 for the Hastings arena. Telephone conversations with the managers of the Apple Valley Sports Arena and Burnsville Ice Arena were also held regarding operating expenditures and revenues for the year 1978. The Apple Valley Sports Arena had an .operating budget of $93,600 including $47,000 for salaries and personal services and $30,000 for utilities. Primary revenue sources were $34,000 from sale of ice time and $12,000 from tennis. Figures from other income sources were not available. Apple Sports Arena is open year round with tennis as the main off- season use. The sports arena also has an extensive contract with the school district for use of the facility. Burnsville's Ice Arena operates its ice facility year round. During 1978, expenditures for this arena totalled $154,000 and revenues attained the $150,000 mark. Utility expenses account for a major portion of the arenas expenditures and the arena manager acknowledged that a 10% annual increase in utilities cost is budgeted. . • The Shakopee Ice Hockey Association intends to reduce their operating expenses by volunteering much of the labor. The plan is to hire an arena superintendent who would be primarily responsible for maintenance purposes. Management of the arena, however, the local hockey association informed this staff person, is to be a responsibility a few members of the association. This intended course of action is strongly recommended against by City Staff. • • • • . A _ �5_ 7 In discussions with managers of hockey arenas and in a telephone conversation with the former manager of the Alexandria Ice Arena, who is presently Parks and Recreation Director at Belle Plaine, several facts were brought out in the open concerning ice arena operation and management. One of these facts relates to the operation of the arena - is it to be self - sufficient (are revenues to be • relatively close to expenditures ?) or is the arena to be heavily subsidized by • local govespment? In modern times of public clamor regarding public spending coupled with the' fact that governments should be accountable for their actions, a self - sufficient ice arena is definitely favorable. . Managers of arenas stated that if an arena is to be operated like a business, • it should be managed like a business. That means a manager, in a business -like manner, must make a conscious effort to insure that the arena is self- sufficient. Efforts must be directed toward those groups, such as high schools which will buy • • ice time. No groups should be given discounts but the situation in Shakopee raises legitimate questions on this matter. Since the hockey association will solicit funds to construct the arena and it will also donate labor in varying capacities in the operation of the arena, some sort of suitable arrangements could be made ' in the purchase of ice time. Attempts should be directed, however, on insuring that the operation of the arena remains self - sufficient. The hockey association • should support their ice arena. Management of an ice arena, according to present and former arena managers, involves a well- experienced person who can establish rapport with crowds and teams and is attuned to arena promotion and public relation activities. Manage- ment requires techniques of tact and patience as well as a willingness to assume responsibility in a decision making role. The local hockey association may lack persons who possess the experience to perform these activities. • In other conversations with the local hockey association, tentative plans call for the hiring of a person recently graduated from the Dakota County Technical • Institute which offers a program in "Arena Management". .Further discussions with a former ice arena manager who serves on the board of directors of this program and who has also participated in various seminars sponsored by this program admits that persons pursuing a degree in the "Arena Management" program are heavily trained in arena maintenance and less intensely groomed for actual arena management. This informational source advised against hiring a recently graduated person from the Dakota County Technical Program to assume management of an arena mainly because these persons have.mot had the necessary experience to adequately . an arena. • , Another reason for recommending against the local hockey association managing the arena involves the number of hours included in the operation of an ice arena. ' Assume that the arena is open for active use from 3 -11 p.m. on weekdays and 8 a.m to 11 p.m. on weekends. This schedule demands that someone in a decision making capacity must be present for over 70 hours per week. Multiplying this figure by an October 1 to April 1 (26 weeks) results in 1820 hours. .This •is an extremely high number of•hours to donate ones,ti.me for expecially considering that managing an arena is no easy task. A lot of difficult, spontaneous decisions must . be . made from time to .time. • • -26- Perhaps no quicker and more complete dampning to voluntary zeal can occur than from a too -high demand, both from a pressure standpoint and a time stand - point, placed upon volunteers. Taking too much, too soon, upon itself may be a grave mistake for the local hockey association to make. Revenues Reiterating that the Shakopee Ice Arena can expect operating expenditures between $50,000 and $75,000 and according to sound business practices that an ice arena should be self - sufficient, revenues from operation should match or exceed operating expenditures. In order to accomplish this fact, efforts should be directed toward those groups able and willing to buy substantial amounts of ice time. These groups include high schools, other hockey associations and company groups. The future Shakopee Ice arena should not discourage the patronage of any of these paying customers. A telephone survey of three area high schools - Shakopee, Chaska, and Prior Lake - was recently conducted regarding the buying of ice time if a Shakopee ice arena were actually built. Two questions were asked: (1) What is the budget of your school's hockey program in general and what is your school's budget for ice time in particular? and (2) If the proposed Shakopee arena were an alternative to their present situation, would their school district be willing to buy ice time from it? Shakopee School District The telephone conversation was conducted with Dr. Robert Mayer, Superintendent of'Schools. He acknowledged that the school board had approved a budget of $2,500 to buy ice time for 1979 -1980 season at the LeSueur facilities. This amount does not include transportation, hiring of referees for games, etc. Confrohted with the second question (Would the school district be willing to buy ice time at Shakopee arena ?) Dr. Mayer answered in the affirmative but admitted that he did not think the school board would increase the budget for purchasing ice time from the $2,500 to $3,000 range. The school board has been quite firm in controlling spending for its extra-curricular activities, Dr. Mayer said. Chaska School District Mr. Amundson, Superintendent of Chaska Schools, was interviewed with respect to its hockey program. The Chaska School Board has approved an operating budget of $5,227 for the 1979 -80 school year. This amount does not include the rental of ice time, but costs for transportation ($3,125), equipment ($1,532), hiring of officials for games ($530) and $)40 for miscellaneous costs. In addition to the $5,227 worth of expenditures mentioned above, the athletic director of the Chaska School District acknowledged that the school expended $14,000 for ice rental for practice sessions from its capital outlay budget. Also, the district has a contract with the St. Louis Park Ice Arena, whereby the School pays $175 for the use of the arena for each home game. This $175 comes out of gate receipts; and the arena and school share 50 -50 any amounts over $175 taken in from gate receipts. If both varsity and junior varsity games are to be played, the rental price climbs to $275. -27- Usually ten home varsity games are played each Y g p y year for a total •of $1,750 and five home junior varsity games for a total of $500. • (This latter figure was caluclated by subtracting $175 (rental price for ',4 a varsity home game) from $275 (rental price for both varsity and junior varsity home games) and multiplying by the number of junior varsity home games.) • The athletic director seemed enthused at the possibility of a Shakopee Arena. Assuming that suitable ice rental time was available, the athletic director estimated that Chaska High School would be willing to buy 75 -80 hours worth of ice time for practices in addition to scheduling ten home games in the Shakopee arena. These estimates are purely hypothetical contingent upon school board approval. Assuming that Chaska would be able to buy the ice time mentioned in the preceeding paragraph from the Shakopee ice arena, $3,600 (80 hours x $45 per hour) pluss $2,250 (home game costs using the contract of the St. Louis Park arena) or $5,850 would be available to the proposed Shakopee arena from the Chaska School District. Prior Lake School District • Discussing the budget of the Prior Lake School District with the District's athletic director, he acknowledged that $7,650 is budgeted toward the hockey program (including transportation costs) for the 1979 -80 school year. This amount is exclusive of the rental cost of ten varsity home games and five junior varsity home games. Assuming that suitable ice time was available in a Shakopee Ice Arena, Prior Lake's athletic director estimated that the district would be willing to buy 60 -80 hours of practice time in addition to the costs involved in renting the arena for ten varsity games and five junior varsity games. Sixty to eighty hours of ice time multiplied by $45 per hour equals $2700 - $3600 the Prior Lake School District would be willing to pay for practice ice time. Added to this figure would be $1750 (10 home games multiplied by $175 per game) for varsity home games pluss $500 (5 home • games multiplied by $100 per game) or $2,250 for home hockey games. Assuming these figures, $4,950 - $5,850 would be available to the proposed Shakopee arena from the Prior Lake School District. • Total Anticipated Revenue The combined revenue available from the three school districts surveyed, given all the assumptions stated, would be as follows: • • � l -28- . SCHOOL DISTRICT ESTIMATED REVENUE Shakopee $2,500 - $3,000 Chaska $5,850 Prior Lake $4,950 - $5,850 TOTAL $13,300 - $14,700 Bear in mind that these figures reflect the availability of suitable hours - but the number of suitable hours are limited. Repeating that the estimated expenditures of the proposed arena will range between $50,000 and $75,000 and that the estimated revenues from the Shakopee, Chaska and Prior Lake School Districts range from $13,300 to $14,700, a deficit of $36,625 $60,300 still exists. This differnece would have to be made up from other activities. Off- season shows, exhibits, activities, etc. cannot be depended on since, as mentioned earlier, Shakopee is located too near to the Twin Cities where a myriad of ideal facilities are located. Area:youth hockey leagues would book some of the time of the proposed arena. Following are the number of participants in Shakopee's Park & Recreation Department Youth Hockey Program for the past three seasons: SEASON NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS 1976 -1977 171 1977 -1978 185 1978 -1979 165 Five different age groups are found in Shakopees youth hockey league. One of these age groups, the squirts (9 -10 year olds), played fourteen league games during the 1978 -1979 season. Youth hockey tournaments would require some of the ice time on weekends, while youth hockey leagues from surrounding communities would likewise book some of the hours available of the proposed arena. It has been pointed out by other arena managers that no groups should be given discounts in ice rental prices. Even though the local hockey association will have constructed the arena, they should feel obligated to support the facility. Mention was made earlier where some sort of agreement could be arranged whereby a reduction in the rental price for youth hockey games would be exchanged for voluntary labor supplied by the Association. A definite value of the volunteer labor would have to be determined in this case, and the appropriate discount in price would have to be calculated. Again, every effort should be made to insure that the arena operates in a self - sufficient manner. -29- The local mens broomball league has had six teams during each of the last two seasons. 102 team members in 1977 -1978 and 96 team • members in 1978 -1979 participated in the league. Ten games and two . play-off games were played by broomball teams last season. It should be noted that outdoor rinks will still be available in the City and it may very well be that the mens broomball league and /or some of the youth hockey teams would prefer to play outside rather than inside the proposed arena. Other uses of the arena may include open skating - figure and hockey - and appropriate hours should be scheduled and rates should be determined. Concessions remain another revenue avenue which should be investigated in a judicious manner. Again, an experienced manager is needed to effectively operate the arena. In terms of the anticipated revenues, income may approach expenditures if good management practices are followed and efforts are directed to solicit those groups willing and able to afford ice time. Even though these manager practices are employed and efforts are directed toward those groups able to afford ice time, revenues may still fall substantially short of matching expenditures. • CONCLUSIONS Based on the information presented throughout this report, the following conclusions concerning the proposed Shakopee arena can be drawn: 1. Operating expenditures are expected to range between $50,000 and $75,000. 2. Utility costs are a major portion of expenditures and are expected to rise dramatically in the future.•. 3. Revenues may approach the $50,000 - $75,000 range of expenditures if: a. Those groups such as high schools which are able to afford ice time are solicited. b. Effective scheduling according to priorities is determined and followed. c. Experienced, effective management of the arenas' operatiop occurs. d. No discounts are given to any groups. e. Possible revenues may still be substantially short of meeting expenditures. 4. The estimated final construction cost of the arena ranges between $750,000 and $800,000. 5. Substantial differences exist in energy efficiency between available types of ice making equipment. -30- 7a' 6. Other costs to the City are involved once the City owns the structure. Some of these costs are parking lot construction, maintenance and snow removal, insurance and provision of water. 7. Several persons involved with hockey arenas have indicated a • fear that the interest in hockey may be a passing fad. • RECOMMENDATIONS As mentioned in the introduction to this report, one option avail- able to the local hockey association involves the construction of a hockey arena through the solicitation of funds from the community, operating the arena for three years and then turning ownership of the facility over to the City of Shakopee. Based on this option and in light of the information presented in this report, staff offers to the Mayor and City Council the following recommendations that: 1. A quality building and ice arena facility be constructed. It will require that sufficient funds be raised to construct a quality building. 2. The City staff be allowed to review and comment on construction plans and the.City Council should give final approval on the building design and construction type before fund raising campaigns begin. 3. The City and local hockey association arrive at an agreement involving the payment of extensions of watermains, payment for possible needed improvements for adequate water protection, payment of parking lot and landscaping costs, and the terms of turning over the ownership of the facility from the local hockey association to the City. 4. Before any construction commences and preferably before any funds are collected, contracts should be signed with the potential users of the facilities (local high schools) to insure at least some income. 5. To operate an ice arena in Shakopee an estimated net revenue of $50,000 to $75,000 are needed and the sources of these revenues should be clearly stated by the Hockey Association. 6. In the event that ownership of the facility is assumed by the City, no outstanding expenses, construction, operating or otherwise will be likewise assumed by the City. 7. A professional arena manager should be hired before final design is completed and construction begun. Some sort of off - season employment must be found, perhaps as manager of the municipal pool; 8. Some type of written agreement be accepted by both the local hockey association and the City of Shakopee regarding recommendations 1 - 7 listed above before any fund raising campaign commences. ,..,,9. Any ice facility should be operated only for the skating season. No other uses appear fin<.acial1y feasible, • -31- 61.-/ • 10. The concession sand should be operated and volurita labor for part -time duties should be provided by thee hockey association. 11. Portable bleachers now owned by the City and used outside in the summer should be utilized in the arena. No real need to purchase bleachers exists but an access to transport the bleachers into the arena is needed. 12. Alternate methods of supplying ice should be explored and a cost /benefit analysis prepared. For example, it is possible to build a structure with a roof and sides and uses only natural ice. This structure could double as a picnic shelter in the summer if the sides were removable. 13. The arena should be constructed as a total package and not built partially. Funds to complete the entire project should . be available before construction starts. i A + / //, a • SUPPLEMENT TO REPORT ON SHAKOPEE ICE ARENA Ice Rentals for Arenas Hutchinson High School Contract $ 9,000 Youth Hockey 4,500 Youth Hockey Tournaments (80 hours @ $40) 3,200 Mens Broomball League 1 ' 0 _ TOTAL $18,200* * Does not include rentals for open skating. Farmington Farmington High School 100 hrs.•ppractice time @ $45 4,500 Farmington High School 10 home games @ $245(contraet)2,450 Lakeville High 100 hrs practice time @ $45 4,500 Lakeville High 10 home games @ $245 2,450 *Prior Lake High 20 hrs practice time @ $45 900 *Prior Lake High 8 home games @ $45 • 1,960 TOTAL HIGH SCHOOL $16,700 Farmington Youth Hockey 220 hours @ $45 9,900 Lakeville Youth Hockey 220 hours @ $45 9,900 Rosemount Youth Hockey 280 hours @ $45 12 TOTAL. YOUTH HOCKEY $32,400 • TOTAL 1978 -79 Season :$49,140 • * Prior Lake will not be able to rent ice from Farmington for - the 1979- 80'season. , • Hastings Hastings High School . . 7,000 a�,Qf30 • • Red Wing High School 7,400 - $19Q::, Hasting6 Youth Hockey 270 hrs. @.$50 13 . . .. • • •$27.,.500 -29,509* * Plus an undetermined amount for the Red ding :•Youth Hockey Asgic i$tJon and Mendota and Inver Grove Heights Youth Hockey Assgciat�,Q .' • • , . a, June 1, 1979 ' . • • r • • • q• ct Preliminary Plat, Macey Second Addition February 14, 1980 Page -2- at this time, the lots would be excessively deep with direct access onto Market Street, which is a collector street. 3. At the request of the Planning Commission, the staff has re- designed the plat to include the provision of more • two- family house lots. The two - family home lots were designed to accommodate two - family homes with tuck -under garages. The homes with the tuck- under garages will insure additional storage space on lots where it is not economically feasible to construct basements due to surface rock. 4. The lots as presently designed, meet the minimum standards of the R -2 district. • • 6. The lots will all be cleared of present structures with the exception of the house on Lot 1, Block 2. 7. The cul -de -sac has been extended to the southern extreme of the plat to permit the possible extension of Minnesota Street or permit public access to a possible trail on the abandoned rail right -of -way. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat. • 9 � Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. J59 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SALE AND ISSUANCE OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS UNDER THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT TO FINANCE A PROJECT THEREUNDER, SECURED BY PAYMENTS TO BE RECEIVED PURSUANT TO A LOAN AGREE- MENT AND A PLEDGE AND ASSIGNMENT OF THE CITY'S INTEREST IN THE LOAN AGREEMENT AND PAYMENTS • THEREUNDER TO A TRUSTEE, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the City) as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Recitals. 1.01. General Authority. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended (the Act), to issue its revenue bonds and .to make secured or unsecured loans to finance the acquisition of real property and the acquisition or construction of buildings and improvements on such real property and the installation of machinery and equipment of any and all -kinds and any other personal properties - deemed•necessary in connection with a project, as defined in the Act. 1.02. Proposed Project and Bonds. Representatives of First Corporate Services, Inc. (the Agent) and Perkins 'Cake & Steak, Inc. (the Company), a Minnesota corporation have proposed that the City acting under and pursuant to the Act, issue and sell its $600,000 Commercial Development • Revenue Bonds-(Perkins 'Cake & Steak, Inc. Project), Series 1980 (the Bonds) for the purpose of defraying the costs of a Project (the Project) consisting of acquisition of certain land, and construction thereon of one or more buildings :and certain other related improvements to be used by the Company as a family restaurant. Pursuant to the proposal, the proceeds of the Bonds will be loaned by the City to the Company and the Company agrees to make payments sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds. The City will assign its interest in the Loan Agreement (as hereinafter -defined) to a Trustee (as hereinafter defined). 1.03. Prior Approval. On January 16, 1979, this Council. adopted a resolution giving preliminary approval to the Project and authorizing preparation of necessary • documents.. • • 1.04. Project Cost. The Company and the Agent have advised this Council and this Council hereby finds that the estimated costs of the Project to be paid out of Bond • proceeds are approximately as follows: .,:, wrn±+�wy• �aa+Nr+ • Construction $402,000 Equipment 150,000 Architectural and Engineering Fees 10,000 Legal Fees 9,500 Interest During Construction 10,500 Agent's Commission 18,000 Total $600,000 All costs of the Project in excess of the proceeds of the. Bonds available therefor are required to be paid by the Company. • 1.05. Documentation. Forms of the following documents relating to the Project have been prepared and submitted to this Council and are hereby directed to be filed with the City Clerk. (a) a Loan Agreement (the Loan Agreement), to be dated as of January 15,•1980, proposed to be made • and entered into between the City and the Company pursuant to which the City loans the proceeds of the Bonds to the Company; • (b) a Mortgage and Security Agreement (the Mortgage), to be dated as of Janaury 15, 1980, executed by the Company, as,Mortgagor, and The Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis, in Minneapolis, Minnesota (the Trustee), as Mortgagee, pursuant to which the Company secures payment of the Bonds; (c) an Indenture of Trust (the Indenture), to be dated as of Janaury 15, 1980, proposed to be made and entered into between the City and the Trustee, creating and authorizing the issuance of and establishing the terms and conditions of the Bonds; • (d) a Guaranty Agreement (the Guaranty), to be dated as of Janaury 15, 1980, by which Holiday Inns, Inc. (the Guarantor), which owns all of the outstanding capital stock of the Company, will guaranty to the Trustee the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds; and . (e) a Private Placement Memorandum (the Memorandum), dated as of December 15, 1979, pursuant to which infor- mation relating to the City, the Company, the Guarantor, the Project, the Bonds, and the documents described herein will be given to the purchasers of the Bonds by the Agent. Section 2. Findings. • It is hereby found; determined and declared that: -2- • (a) the Project, as defined herein and in the Loan Agreement, constitutes a project authorized by Section ' 474.02, Subdivision la of the Act. (b) the purpose of the Project is and the effect thereof will be to promote the public welfare by encouraging and retaining the location, retention and development of economically sound industry and commerce within the City so as to prevent, so far as possible, the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; by promoting the use of available resources of the community thereby retaining the benefit of its existing investment in educational and public service facilities; by dicouraging the movement of talented, educated personnel of mature age to other areas, thus preserving the economic and human resources needed as a base for providing governmental services and facilities; and by encouraging more intensive development of land ih the City to provide an adequate and better balanced tax base.to finance the increase in the amount and cost of governmental services; • (c) the Project is to be located in the City, at a site which is readily accessible to employees residing within the City and the surrounding community; (d) the Project when completed will add to the tax base of the City and overlapping taxing jurisdictions; (e) the Project has been approved by the Commissioner of Securities of the State of Minnesota, as tending to further the purposes and policies of the Act: (f) the financing of the Project, the issuance and sale of the Bonds in the principal amount of $600,000, the execution and delivery of the Loan Agreement and the Indenture and the performance of all covenants and agreements of the City contained in the Loan Agreement and the Indenture and of all other acts and things required under the laws of the State of Minnesota to make the Loan Agreement, the Indenture and the Bonds valid and binding obligations in accordance with their terms, are authorized by the Act; (g) it is desirable that a series of Commercial Development Revenue Bonds in the amount of $600,000 be issued by the City upon the terms set forth in the Indenture, under the provisions of which the City's interest in the Loan Agreement and the payments thereunder will be pledged to the Trustee as security for the payment of the principa] of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds; • .(h) the loan payments required by the Loan Agreement are fixed, and are required to be revised from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenue sufficient to provide for prompt payment of principal of -3- and interest on all Bonds issued under the Indenture when • due; and the Loan Agreement also provides that the Company is required to pay all expenses of the operation and main- tenance of the Project, including, but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and insurance against all liability for injury to persons or property arising from the • operation thereof, and all taxes and special assessments • levied upon or with respect to the Project site and payable during the term of the Loan Agreement, and pursuant to the • Mortgage the Company has mortgaged and granted a security interest•in certain described facilities comprising the Project, as defined in the Mortgage; • (i) under the provisions of Section 474.10 of the Act and as provided in the Loan Agreement and Indenture, the Bonds are not to be payable from nor charged upon any funds of the City other than the revenue pledged to the payment • thereof; the City is not subject to any liability thereon • and no holders of the Bonds shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing powers of the City to pay any of the Bonds or the interest thereon nor to enforce • payment thereof against any property of the City; the Bonds shall not.constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City except its interest in the Loan Agreement; each Bond issued under the Indenture shall recite that the Bonds, including interest thereon, are . • payable solely from the revenues pledged to the payment thereof; and no Bond shall constitute a debt of the City • within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limiatation. • Section 3. Authorization and Approval of the Project, Loan Agreement, Indenture, Mortgage, Guaranty and Memorandum. The-City is hereby authorized to provide for the acquisition, construction and equipment of the Project and to pledge and assign the revenues therefrom and its interest in the Loan Agreement, all as provided in the Loan Agreement and the Indenture. The forms of Loan Agreement, Indenture, Mortgage, Guaranty and Memorandum referred to in Section 1.05 are approved subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the City Attorney and the Mayor; which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by • execution of the Loan Agreement, the Indenture and the Bonds by the Mayor and City Clerk. The Mayor and City Clerk are directed to execute the Loan Agreement upon execution thereof by the Company, and the Indenture upon execution thereof by the .Trustee. Copies of all of the documents shall be delivered, filed and recorded as provided therein. The Mayor and City Clerk are also authorized and directed to execute such other instruments as may be required to give effect to the trans- actions herein contemplated. • -4- Section 4. The Bonds; Terms, Sale and Execution. • • 4.01. Authorization. In anticipation of the collection of revenues of the Project, the City shall pro- ceed forthwith to issue its Bonds dated as of January 15, 1980, in the form and upon the terms set forth in the Inden- ture and this resolution. The Bonds are sold to the original purchasers thereof at the prices and upon the terms • • specified in the Memorandum. The use of the Memorandum by the Agent in connection with the sale of the Bonds is hereby approved, and the Agent is hereby directed to prepare and distribute to the original purchasers a supplement to the Memorandum, which supplement shall set forth the matur- ities of, and interest rates to be borne by, the Bonds and identify the Trustee. • 4.02. Execution. The Mayor and City Clerk are • hereby authorized and directed to execute the Bonds as prescribed herein and in the Indenture and to deliver them to the Trustee, together with a certified copy of this resolution, the other documents required in the Indenture, and such other certificates, documents and instruments as may be appropriate to effect the transaction herein contem- plated. The Trustee is hereby appointed authenticating agent pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1. • 4.03. Modifications, Absence of Officers. The approval hereby given to the various documents referred to above includes an approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifi- cations thereto, deletions therefrom and additions thereto . as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by the City Attorney prior to the execution of the documents. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. In the absence of the Mayor or City Clerk, any of the documents authorized by this resolution to be executed, may be executed by the acting Mayor or acting City Clerk respectively. Mayor Attest: • City Clerk • • -5- • /o&) MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Jeanne Andre, H.R.A. Director RE: Public Hearings Scheduled for Feb. 19, 1980 DATE: February 14, 1980 Hearings regarding community development block grants (CDBG) will be held next Tuesday. They were advertised in the Feb. 6th issue of the Shakopee Valley News. An afternoon hearing at 2:00 P.M. will be conducted by the staff. An evening hearing (8:00 P.M.) will be conducted before the Council. Two separate issues will be discussed ' at each session. The first issue to be addressed is the amendment of the Shakopee 1977 CDBG (Bluff Avenue Improvements). The amendment requests that funds remaining at the completion of this project ($16,389.13) be transferred to the Shakopee 1978 CDBG (4th & Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project). This amendment was filed at the suggestion of HUD officials. If the money is not transfered, it will revert to the Federal Government. Blasting and fill costs of the 1978 CDBG are higher than anticipated, so we welcome the opportunity to divert extra funds to that project. A public hearing on this amendment is necessary to comply with HUD regulations. The second issue to be addressed is the City's performance on present and completed Community Development Block Grants. According to HUD regulations, the City is required to hold a public hearing each year to hear citizen comments on the planning,. implementation and results of all CDBG's. Shakopee has received three grants for which comments are invited: a] 1975 City -wide home improvement loan program b] 1977 Public utility improvements on Bluff Avenue c] 1978 Neighborhood Revitalization Project at 4th and Minnesota Streets JA /jsc E- -<l Distributed by: MINNESOTA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION September, 1978 :Izzzazmizzen F 1 NA .-,. t 1 NG , ...,.., E 4 76-4! 2� 01 --3 L ,3 �i�► �' -11- '' '''''' aii, I- r - .......,_yr .. pi '-, ,--.-.. ___ ,i, - - . fil ri p e . if it----- ----._ _ . . 'el r. - ‹.1.: •-nliA 1. — - 1,i iir ',."-- ..._ . 1 S III= r 4 -1,,e,* , ,t,,,..:.$1. ....._____:......,_ .1/4.-= 7 • Imo'' _ 7 �` k--. 1 MI NNESO T ; - 197 BY MINNESOTA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES • EDUCATION COMMITTEE • al6=22=30a WIEZZA .... • . E;J'OCATRN ! EVE . • • ... 1 . • „..... 4 k; • F ' (r y 1 T.-XL:11'r -.11_\ r� is IF • , F ! - e y.� w i Vii. 1 1 7 i ___ __ �/ ° .4... • 7 � �� s �Si y k.... . fil .. . — Wif .0.1tAti•-•,.., - VT. 1.41tri j �If= ;S f �a x tti iN yM L. 2 r� t� 1 a . u . All r ,•� • , - . ' 3e J �i 'films _ • _____ --- . _ T I I L. D 0 I. LA 3'.0 LOCAL LEVY + STAT ......... . . , . . . • i. :of .„,,,...,-. 1\ . . TOTAL pioLit Rs Si* `•\ 1 PUPIL UNITS �� _ . , r: .: . FORMULA ALLOWANCE if a � . ■ ' fir / t I 1 • i s 4i i y + ` _ _ • <.� 1 1111 x' 4i x • r 1 ; o M .."410 1. 1 tilintilie, •7 - ..;-1/1i4- ,.., 1 , sa ClIt f L; •V •.. . 4`.x . MILL RAT X r 1 • . TAXABLE VALUE X 11 �� 1r. w 1 r M I ,� 1 • . , , STATE Ai) • .1.4 k s � C • .4 ' i e . ;:+ Or TOTAL DOLLARS - LOCAL LEVY = , t 0� , r : �4 : ,, � _ � • -2- -ter r1iN . • i • 6. UFARS - Uniform Financial Accounting and Reporting System - Used to manage finances so that districts provide programs within the resources available. 7. School Funds - A set of financial accounts to manage school operations. Fund Number 1 - General Fund - General operations of school - salaries and related expenses - supplies - custodial operations 2 - Food Service Fund - School lunch program 3 - Transportation Fund - Pupil transportation 4 - Community Service Fund - Community programs . . • 5 - Capital Outlay Fund - Capital Programs - acquisition of and - - repair of buildings - equipment • • • .t 1 :. • . Cx }f.2 e+f :rO ro:.�? tint) • • -4- ar MINNESOTA SCHOOL FINANCE TERMS 1. Foundation Aid Program - the method by which schools are financially supported by the state. As of 1971 the aid formula replaced local taxes as the major source of school revenue for operating purposes. Foundation Aid • . • . a.' Establishes the basic level of finance - includes state and local sources standardizes educational expenditures b. Equalizes differences in property wealth Foundation Aid = Foundation Aid Formula Allowance - Local Effort + Agricultural Tax Credit • • 2. Categorical Aids - Additional resources for specific school programs. a. Transportation aid b. Special education aid c. Vocational education aid d. Child nutrition aid • • 3. Assessed Valuation - A value set upon real estate or other property as a basis for levying taxes. The value is determined by each local assessor. 4. Equalized Aid Review Committee (EARC) - A 3- member committee establishe to normalize property values based on assessment practices and market values. - 'Commissioner of Revenue - Commissioner of Education - Commissioner of Administration • 5. Pupil Weighting - A weighted count of•pupils used to determine state ai Students Pupil Units . One Kindergartener _ .5 pupil units One Elementary = 1.0 pupil units One Secondary = 1.4 pupil units -3- • R r :; 7 '' v ' rv '''' „d ? - •.•-,.,*.., 4 , ; -„c' t ,...,-,.. 3 , r f.7 . 70'r 4 46: e r, ..... „ „ � ...•;:•. Via•`;::' t � 1 • . • .I -' � fl /�T. }` . Y � j air .;:-.••; • A r jr"‘ . ,, j . :. .. , .,::: q.,-. • ..,...,.... ....../ . -•,, - -- - .;71.- , - T . r ,..--- -- .,: ,..--;:: - " . • !..t. 4-. .. `` L •. i. "� _ ! t. . "� Y-' �, -�` - •. • Ji: '. . i, : fi t.': .. . � --Li • .r : ...... -,;. -...'" , ,,.., k ..>•••• -...4, ___, - ....1. - di:. • , 7........i .7,- . C.: .. fi 1 1 L . . ..4 ... ; ,.. .... . 'A% — 'n 4 .■...7:4;:"" - ' .' ''''' .1 Example 2 Low Valuation in District • • • Gopherville School District Number Pupil Units = 1000 State Formula Allowance $1095 per pupil unit EARC (Adjusted Value) = $7,500,000 (change) • Formula . • • Formula Allowance' - Local effort = State Aid ($) Formula # Pupil Adjusted Allowance x Units - (28 mills) x Value = State Aid - -.!> $1095 x 1000 - .028 x $7,500,000 = State Aida; $1,095,000 - $210,000 = $885,000 • LOW VALUE DISTRICT State Aid per pupil unit = • $885.00.! 1 r;.Sl,t:�, / ". ..t i A9 2 i J Local Property Tax Effort = 28 adjusted mills • Percent State Aid = 80.8 Percent Local Revenue = 19.2 -6- .... .„ l.,...... r ' L . r , . -.. . (...r_.......• ...\ 4 * ..3•(-Cr ...., , ., t .., .. 4.0,7, , ..,,, . ,:- '''' 7 ,... .•;feci, . ... . be : .4' ; N: IL-;. `;■‘01` .1- LI (--, .. .0 . . % ...' 1 AL . - _...10. -..,, ..-.-, i , ' - : ..., -_,. ice Y _�: /i :a.. Example 1 Average Valuation In District Gopherville School District Number Pupil Units = 1000 State Formula Allowance = $1095 per pupil unit EARC (Adjusted Valuation) - $15,000,000 • Formula 1' Formula Allowance - Local effort = State Aid ($) • Formula # Pupil Adjusted Allowance x Units - (28 mills) x Value = State Aid a $1095 x 1000 - .028 x = $15,000,000 State Aid $1,095,000 - $420,000 = S675,000 • .: ,,., AVERAGE EXPENDITURE State Aid Per Pupil Unit = $675.00 DISTRICT Local Property Tax Effort = 28 adjusted (mills Percent State Aid = 61.6 • Percent Local Revenue = 38.4 -5- • Comparison O of State Aid and Local Revenue Contribution Gophervi1le School District • Number Pupil Units = 1000. State Formula Allowance = $1095 per pupil unit Valuation Low Average • High Adjusted Va 1 ua t i on $7,500,000 $15,000,000 $30,000,000 Local Property Tax Effort 28 mills 28 mills 28 mills Local Revenue Cont r i but ions $ 210,000 $ 420,000 $ 840,000 State Aid Contributions $ 885,000 $ 675,000 $ 255,000 Percent State Aid 80.8 61.6 23.3 Percent Local Revenue 19.2 38.4 76.7 Total Revenue A v a i l a b l e $1,095,000 $ 1,095,000 $ 1.095,000 • ,ve /,' \'' , -8- .. _ __ • _ -- /6 [1(1xit I - oou 1, ylrlr J ... L, :4: --+—.: � ► f • till V1111 (t — 111 ler ,ial,,o gtofil v" II t�l� pin J • ... i t C di Id d ~ 4 to: � } , ' -- I :. � • O 1 � �• AIOC a -, - .... a .. P 6 TA / igid22E 12#0% tErSIN 1 : i , . 1 r * \ - ..- a } 0 0* c.. ,_ :-- - \li i'Diil eY2T2 i ft .0 -_-:._ A 7T mL__In___, . ..,,, ,. a , • Example 3 High Valuation in District Gopherville School District Number Pupil Units = 1000 State Formula Allowance = $1095 per pupil unit EARC (Adjusted Valuation) _ $30,000,000 ' (change) Formula • Formula Allowance - Local effort = State Aid ($)••• Formula I{ Pupil Adjusted ': " Allowance x Units - (28 mi l ls) x Value = State Aid ($) $1095 x 1000 - .028 x $30,000,000 = State Aid $1,095,000 - $840,000 = S255,000 HIGH VALUE DISTRICT State Aid per pupil unit = $255.00 Local Property Tax Effort = 28 adjusted mills Percent State Aid = 23.3 Percent Local Revenue = . 76.7 -7- coz-) le r 000, • • 31). Example 4 Declining Enrollment, Option A • Average Expenditure District Gopherville School District Pupil Units 1975 - 76 = 1300 • • Pupil Units 1976 -77 = 1200 Pupil Units 1977 = 1100 Pupi Uni ts 1978 -79 = 1000 • State Formula Allowance = $1095 per pupil unit EARC (Adjusted Valuation) = $15,000 Declining districts may average the number of pupil uni ts for the current year and the prior 2 years plus of the 3rd prior year for • aid purposes. Thus, (1,000 + 1,100 + 1,200 + 325) 3 = 1,115 Pupil Units Gopherville has 1,115 pupil units for aid purposes. Formula Formula u Pupil Adjusted Allowance x Units - (28 mills) x Value = State Aid ($) $1095 x 1115 - .028 x $15,000,000 = State Aid $1,220,925 - $420,000 = $800,925 Without the averaging, Gopherville would have only generated $675,000 in foundation aid (an additional income to the district of $125,925). Total revenue available per actual pupil unit (with averaging) $1,220,925 ; 1000 = $1,220.92 Total revenue available per actual pupil unit (without averaging) 51,095,000 ' 1000 = $1,095.00 Additional Aid (with averaging) per actual pupil unit = $125.92 -9- 'Example 5 Declining Enrol lment , Opt ion B • Average Expenditure District Gopherville School District Pupil units 1975-76 = 1000 Pupil units 1976 = 1050 Pupil uni ts 1977 - = 1100 Pupil units 1978 -79 - 1000 State Formula Allowance = $1095 per pupil unit EARC (Adjusted Valuation) = $15,000,000 Declining districts may include 60% of the loss of pupil units between the prior year and current year. Thus, a reduction of 100 pupil units would net a reduction of 40 pupil units in the calculation of state aid in the year fol lowing' the loss. Districts that would gain more from this provision than from 3k year averaging are those where the enrollment has not been declining steadily. Gopherville has 1060 pupil units for aid purjoses. Formula Formula 11 Pupil Adjusted Allowance x Units - (28 mills) x Value = State Aid ($) $1095 x 1060 - .028 x $15,000,000 = State Aid $1,160,700 - $420,000 = $740,700 . t Without the "cushion effect" Gopherville would have only generated $675,000 in foundation aid (an additional income to the district of $65,700). • Total revenue available per actual pupil unit (with cushion) $1,160,700 1000 = $1,160.70 Total revenue available per actual pupil unit (without cushion) . $1,095,000 1 1000 = $1,095.00 Additional Aid (with cushion) per actual pupil unit = $65.70 -10- • fir • • Example 6 Fast Growth District (A district growing at greater than 2% increase per year) Average Expenditure District Gopherville School District Number Pupil Units - 1977 -78 = 965 Number Pupil Units - 1978 -79 = 1000' State Formula Allowance = $1095 per pupil unit EARC (Adjusted Valuation) = $15,000,000 a Note - an increase of 35 _kupil units = 3.6% growth Rule - If districts grow at greater than 2% increase per year they add .1 unit x the number of units increased for each percent (rounded to the next whole percent) of increase up to a maximum of .5 additional units. Thus: an increase of 35 units at 3.6 (rounded to 4) growth would add an extra, 14 units. 35 Units x .4 = 14 extra units Formula Formula ; Pupil Adjusted Allowance x Units - (28 mills) x Value = State Aid ($) $1095 x 1014 - .028 $15,000,000 = State Aid $1,110,330 - $420,000 = $690,330 . Total revenue available per pupil unit (with "fast growth" provision) S1,110,330 1000 = $1,110.33 . Total revenue available per pupil unit (without "fast growth" provision) S1,095,000 1000 = $1,095.00 • • -11- Example 7 AFDC Aid Average Expenditure District • Gopherville School District Number Pupil Units = 1000' (with 30 AFDC pupils) State Formula Allowance = $1095. per pupil uni t EARC (Adjusted Valuation) = $15,000,000 `Note - the State allows an extra .5 pupil units to be added for each AFDC pupil. 30 pupils x .5 = 15 extra pupil units (they are allowed to add 15 to 1000 = 1015 units for aid purposes) • Formula Formula # Pupil Adjusted Allowance x Units - (28 mills) x Value = State Aid ($) $1095 x 1015 - .028 x S15,000,000 = State Aid $1,111,425 - • $420,000' = $691,425 Without the extra AFDC Aid, Gopherville would have only generated $675,000 (an additional income to the district of $16,425) Total revenue available per pupil unit (with AFDC) _ $1,111.43 $1,111,425 T 1000 Total revenue available per pupil unit (without AFDC) = $1,095.00 $1,095,000 f 1000 • \) Extra Aid per Pupil Unit = $16.43 • -12- • Example 9 Districts with Grandfather Levy Gophervi1le School District Pupil Units 1978-79 = 1000 Above Average Expenditures = $1200 Formula Average Allowance = $1095 per pupil unit EARC (Assessed Valuation) _ $15,000,000 This district receives aid at the statewide average rate, but it is allowed to levy an excess levy to meet its higher authorized expenditures. The excess levy is based on the amount per pupil uni t the district was over the state average expendi ture in 1971 when the formula was instituted. Assuming the district was $105 per pupil uni t above average in 1971,. it is permitted to levy an addi tional $105 per pupil uni t each year based on the current pupil units. Formula for 1978 -79 Formula r Pupil Adjusted Allowance x Units - (28 mills) x Value = State Aid ($) $1095 x 1000 - .028 x S15,000,000 = State Aid $1,095,000 - $420,000 = $675,000 Levy x Pupils = Excess Levy allowed $105 x 1000 = $105,000 Total revenue available to this district is: State 'Aid + Average Levy + Excess Levy = Aid $675,000 + $420,000 + $105,000 = $1,200,000 • • Total revenue available per pupil unit (with excess levy) = $1,200.00 $1,200,000 1000) Total revenue avai lable per pupil uni t (without excess levy) _ $1,095.00 (S1,095,000 1000) -14- Example 8 AFDC - Impact Concentration Average Expenditure District GophervilLe School'District Number Pupil Units = 1000 (with 100 AFDC Pupil Units (i0% AFDC)) State Formula Allowance = $1095 per pupil unit EARC (Adjusted Valuation) = $15,000,000 In addition to the extra .5 pupil units, the State allows extra impact aid if the percent of AFDC is above 5%. Impact Aid Schedule h AFDC Increased P.U. New Total 6% to 7% = .1 (plus .5) = .6 7? So 8% = .2 (plus .5) _ . 8°° to 9% _ .3 (plus .5) _ .8 9% to 10% = .4 (plus .5) _ .9 *10? to 110 = .5 (plus .5) = 1.0 11% and above + .6 (plus .5) = 1.1 ;; Gopherville has 10% Thus: 100 AFDC Pupil Units = (100 x .5) = 50 extra plus (.5 x 100) regular AFDC Aid = 50 Total - 100 P.U. f • Formula Formula 1 Pupil Adjusted Allowance x Units - (28 mills) x Value = State Aid (S) $1095 x 1100 - .028 x $15.000,000 = State Aid $1,204,500 - $420,000 = $784,500 Total revenue available per pupil unit (with normal & IMPACT AFDC) S1,204,500 1000 = $1,204.50 Total revenue available per pupil unit (with NORMAL AFDC) S1,149,750 1000 = S1.149.75 Total revenue available per pupil unit (with NO AFDC) 51,095,000 - 1000 = $1,095.00 -13- • • «•,.�!i 5 _te Example 1 ■ I' 7 a,; ,Ty 3 ti - S Transportation Aid �c�; ,9 �.•:2.; , e.# ;$.ts „1* 1 u! . -**.: 1 :". :1 ” .!. ._.: all . .:• r ..." : : 11 ;s rt. - 17 , t.,„ . - . . :',.; : .: ...Ai . ,, .., 4 ' :. i 1 ,. , , . :j: . .71:2 • 1 4 r 3'' � _ mi The State pays to each school district: / - _ 1 1. The actual cost of transporting pupils for authorized services* in 1978 -79, not to exceed 127% of the cost of transporting pupils for authorized services in 1975 -76 * *; • 2. Minus the amount raised by a 1 -mill local levy. * Authorized transportation services include transportation of: 1. Ali pupils living one mile or more from school. 2. Private schools within the district. 3. Handicapped students. . 4. Secondary vocational students in vocational centers. 5. Shared -time students. 6. Board and lodging for handicapped children. 7. Transportation to jointly offered (between districts) classes. ** Adjustments may be made if a district adds new authorized categories ^ between 75 -76 and 78 -79. J ' Example �---- Gopherville School District Number Pupil Units = 1000 Number Actual Students - 835 Number Students Transported = 500 EARC = $15,000,000 • • 1975 Base Year • Transportation Program or Contract Cost = $50,000 Base Cost = $50,000 a 500 Students = $100 1978 -79 Calculation Allowable increase = 27% above 1975-76 Base = $127 500 Students x $127 = $63,500 Transportation Cost = $63,500 Minus 1 mill Levy = 15,000 • State Aid = $48,500 • Example 11 Special Education The State pays: , 1) 69% of the salaries of teachers and essential personnel to a limit of $12,000 per full -time salary plus 5% of the • total salaries as an acknowledgement of administrative costs; plus 2) 50% of supplies and materials (to a limit of $50 per student); plus 3) 60% of the difference between the foundation aid formula allowance and the amount of a contract or tuition charged a home district for special education services provided by contract or in a residential facility. Example Gopherville School District Number Pupil Units - 1000 Number of Students receiving special education instruction 110 Number Special Education Staff - 5 1. 5 Staff @ $17,000 each = $85,000 $85,000 x 69% = $58,650 (Aid is $11,730 per teacher) d plus $85,000 x 5% = $ 4,250 Total Aid = $62,900 2. Equipment and material cost = $ 2 $2150 x 50% _ $ 1,075 (Maximum would be 110 x $50 = $5500) 3. Contracts for special education services with another district 1 @ . $ 4,500 1 @ $1,900 ($4,500 - $1095) $3,405 x 6o% = $ 2,043 ($1,900 - $1095) $ 805 x 60% = $ 483 Total Aid = $ 2,526 Total Special Education Aid = $66,501 D p0 VD e n -16- �11 • • . • • �•2 6- • • O• .)! - - ^'• -� 1 :f Example 12 Secondary Vocational Education Aid The State pays: 1) 50; of the salary of essential licensed personnel; plus . 2) 50% of necessary equipment; plus 3) 50% of necessary teacher travel between instructional sites and to vocational student organization meetings 41th the state. • Example Gopherville School District • Number Pupil units - 1,000 Number Certified Vocational Teachers - 5 1. Salary Essentiai Personnel 5 teachers @ $17,000 each = S85,000 $85,000 x 50% _ $42,500 State Aid 2. Equipment $1,500 x 50% _ $ 750 State Aid 3. Travel . $3,000 x 50% S 1,500 State Aid Total Aid = $44 750 Total Cost a 589,500 -17-. • Example 13 Adult Vocational Education Aid The State pays: 1) 75% of the salaries of essential licensed personnel; plus • 2) 50% of the cost of necessary travel between instructional sites. Example Gopherville School District Number Adult Vocational Pupils - 110 Number Certified Vocational Teachers - 4 (Adult Program) 1. Salary Essential Personnel 1 full -t-me teacher @ $18,000 = $18,000 3 part-time teachers @ $4,000 each = $12,000 Total Salaries = $20,000 $20,000 x 75% = $15,000 State Aid 2. Travel $2,200 x 50% _ $ 1,100 State Aid Total Aid = $16,100 Total Cost = $22,200 • • -18- V J lot . • All 1 .4 111 ti : -: "a, �".... sigiagia p7fitt Example 14 Post-Secondary Vocational Education Aid (Area Vocational - Technical ,Institutes - AVTIs) The State pays: 1) S2240 foundation aid for each student full -time equivalent minus the amount raised by the $2 per day tuition and minus the amount of federal aid. 2) Categorical aid for high-cost programs, 3) Capital Expenditure Aid to replace and repair equipment. Example • Gopherviile School District AVTI Number Students- Average Daily Membership (ADM) = 500` Tuition and Fees = 5220,000 Formula ' 500 ADM x $2,240 aid - $220,000 tuition = State Aid •51,120,000 - $220,000 = $900,000 Foundation Aid plus: Categorical Aid (High Cost Program) S200,000 Capital Expenditure Aid = S200,000 Total AVTI Aid = S1,300,000 • • * 1 ADM = 1 student who attends 175 days per year, 6 hours per day , ..1n Example 15 Community Education Community Education programs are designed to provide the school district residents with the opportunity to utilize educational facilities and p rograms during non - school hours. [ • Community Education Funding 1. $2.00 per capita local levy authority 2. 50 per capita state aid allowed for approved programs in distirct6' that levy at least $1.00 per capita 3. District allowed to charge fees for each course Example Gopherville School District Number of District Residents - 5,000 State Aid @ 50 /capita - $ 2,500 'Local Levy @ $2.00 /capita - $10,000 User fees - $ 2,000 • Total Revenue = $14,500 Expenses • One-half time Director - $ 8,000 Advertising - $ 500 Salary of instructors & indirect costs - $ 6,000 Total Expenses - $14,500 OrHoe Ft "Pr CA" / a ad 67 "1)4 It A2.41 /4.,‹ 1.07. -20- . Example 16 • Agricultural Farm - 320 acres Homestead Non - Homestead Agricultural Agricultural Total Farm (160 Acres (Remaining Containing Bldgs) 160 Acres) - Limited Mkt Value $150,000 $100,000 $250,000 Assessed Value $•42,620 $ 30,000 $ 72,620 Gross Taxes County (40 mills) $1705 $1200 $2905 Township (10 mills) $ 426 $ 300 $ 926 School (55 mills) $2344 $1650 $3994 Total (105 mills) $4475 $3150 $7625 Reductions Agricultural Tax Credit (Ag Mill Differential) -$639 - $300 - $939 (15 mills times assessed value of homestead, 10 mills times assessed value of non - homestead) Homestead Credit • Tax Reduction - $325 - - $325 Net Property Tax $3511 , $2850 $6361 The total amount of the agricultural tax credit is paid to the school district by the state. The school district is paid an amount of the homestead credit equal to the ratio of the school districts adjusted mill rate“ to the total adjusted mill rate times the amount of the • homestead credit reduction. • 5o*' (too X 325 = $162.50) Tax relief aid paid to the school district: $939 - (ag) + $162.50 (homestead) = $1101.50 - Taxes without these credits - $7625 Property tax reductions - $1264 Taxes after agricultural tax credit & homestead credit reductions - $6361 *This tax may be adjusted by other factors also, such as the property tax refund credit. '`'`An adjustment is made for the agricultural tax credit. In the example, the adjustment is 5 mills. -21- Property Tax Relief Aids Agricultural Tax Credit (ag mill differential) * As part of the foundation aid payments in August & November, the state pays districts the amount of the agricultural mill rate differential. This amounts to 15 mills on homestead agricultural property and 10 mills on non - homestead agricultural property. The agricultural mill rate differ- ential provides school tax relief to agricultural property owners. This payment is not reduced by the aid recapture` provisions. (Formula allowance - local effort + agricultural tax credit = foundation aid) Homestead Credit The state also pays a portion of the homestead property owner's school tax through the homestead credit. Forty - five percent of all property taxes on homestead property up to $325 per homestead are deducted from the homeowner's tax bill and that amount is then paid to the appropriate taxing districts by the state in a ratio of the taxing districts' mill rate to the total mill rate for the taxing area after an adjustment is made for the agricultural tax credit. • -22- Example 17 City Urban Homestead Limited Market Value - $60,000 Assessed Value -$17,733 • Gross Taxes County (35 mills) -$ 621 City (30 mills) -$ 532 School (55 mills) -$ 975 Total (120 mills) $2128 Reduction Homestead ,Credit', -$ • New Property Tax ** $1803 • . Of the homestead credit, the school district is paid an amount equal to the ratio of the school district's mill rate to the total mill rate times the amount of the homestead credit reduction.* 55 (120 X 5325 $149) Tax relief aid paid to the school district- _ $149 Tax without this credit - $2128 :s Property tax reduction - $ 325 (a 15? reduction) Tax after homestead credit reductions- $1803 *No property in example city eligible for agricultural tax credit, * *This tax may be adjusted by other factors also, such as the property tax refund credit (circuit breaker). • -23- • • APPROPRIATIONS 1 97 8 1979 Foundation Aid $611,600,000 $627,520,500 Transportation 75,115,000 80,010,000 Special Education 66,225,000 81,240,000 Community and Adult Education 2,309,000 2,380,000 Secondary Vocational 16,000,000 16,200,000 Adult Vocational 4,500,000 5,450,000 AVTI Foundation Aid 59,675,000 56,100,000 AVTI Categorical 7,668,000 7,645,000 AVTI Debt Service 7,608,380 7,814,865 AVTI Capital Expenditure 6,000,000 6,000,000 Other Programs 6,836,110 5,212,150 • Totals $863,536,490 $895,572,515 Biennial Total $1 Agricultural Tax Credit $ 19,045,000 $ 35,000,000* Homestead Credit (School Portion) $126,215,000 $127,737,000* Total State Aid to School Districts: $1,008,796,490 . $1,058,309,515 Biennial Total $2,067,106,005 * estimates • -24- I / MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Tank Truck (Fire Department) DATE: February 14, 1980 1. Attached are the specifications for a cab - chassis for a new Fire Department tanker. The tank on the present truck is in very poor condition and has been repaired several times. The present chassis is not suitable for its application since it has inadequate brakes and an insufficient frame. These spec- ifications should provide us with a truck sized to meet our needs at the lowest possible price without sacrificing quality. Request Council to approve these specifications and set bid opening date for March 10, 1980 at 11:00 AM. 2. I have received quotations for furnishing a tank for the new tank truck. The quotes conform to the needs determined by the Fire Department. The tank is a 3,000 gallon stainless steel tank with fittings and mounted on our truck. We are proposing to buy stainless steel because it should eliminate the corrosion problems we have with our present steel tank. Our current tank is steel and is seven years old. The rust and corrosive effects of the sand in the water have destroyed the steel. Steel tanks can be coated for corrosion but the sand would scour off the coating. A stain- less steel tank should have a life probably closer to twenty years as compared to the seven years for the current tank. The quotes we received are for a baffled tank with manhole and fill opening, dump valve with three -way discharge and a drain. This is a simple basic tank, no pump, platform or compartments. The quotes are: Arrow Tank and Eng. Co. $10,005.00 Yarusso Mfg. Co. 7,000.00 Yarusso Mfg. Company is located in Shakopee and Rod Bassinger, who is familiar with tank construction, is satisfied that they can produce a quality tank for us. Recommend Council award the tank quotation to Yarusso Mfg. Co. for a price of $7,000.00. This unit has been in the Five Year Capital Equipment list and is in the current budget at $30,000.00. It is estimated that the tank and chassis will come in at under $30,500.00. ' Douglas S. Reeder -2- February 14, 1980 6 Y/ 3. From what I have been able to find out, I think the drive line specified is the best one for this use. Ford and IH should be able to bid on this truck. Chevrolet does not offer a two -speed axle in this type of truck and this would not meet these specifications. GMV /jiw • f MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director SUBJECT: Fire Dept. Tank Truck DATE: February 8, 1980 • I have met with representatives of the Fire Dept. concerning the proposed tank truck. I believe we are in agreement as to the specifications and type of unit we are after. The specifications are prepared and coming to you and the Council with a separate memo. I think we are down to the basic truck needed and there is nothing significant we can change to lower the cost with- out jeopardizing performance or safety. The only questions I see for the Council to address are do we need a tanker of this size (3,000 gal.) and do we need a stainless steel tank versus a steel tank? I feel we should go with stainless steel as it will provide a much more ser- viceable tank and last much longer and therefore be less expensive in the long run. As for the size, it would be larger than most fire tankers, but is not the largest either. The Fire Dept. feels they can be more effective with this size unit by having more water on scene sooner and by hauling more water per ( trip with possibly fewer trips per fire. We do have a large rural area and a growing industrial park that is not totally served by water service. To cut back to a 2,000 gallon tank would probably put us close to maximum load- ing for a single axle truck. I recommend we go with the 3,000 gallon stainless steel tanker. GV /klk • • NOTICE TO BIDDERS • Notice is hereby given that bids will be received until 11:00 a.m. CST on 10 March, 1980 at which time they will be opened and tabulated in the City Hall Building in the City of Shakopee, Minnesota. Tandem Cab Chassis in accordance with specifications on file in the Shakopee City Hall, Shakopee, Minnesota. All bids shall be sealed; envelope shall be plainly marked "City of Shakopee Tandem Cab Chassis March 10, 1980," All bids will be referred to the City Council for action at Council meeting to be held on March 18, 1980 at 7:30 p.m. Bids shall be good for thirty days. The Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids, or to waive informal- .. ities or minor irregularities therein. Douglas S. Reeder City Administrator By order of the City Council Dated February 21, 1980 i1& • CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Specifications for a Tandem Cab /Chassis 1,. Instructions to Bidders A. Bid must be typewritten or written in ink. B. Bid envelope must be sealed and bear the inscription "Bid for Tandem Cab/ Chassis" as well as the name and address of the bidder. C. Bid envelopes shall be addressed to City of Shakopee, Director of Finance, 129 E. First Ave., Shakopee, Minn. 55379. D. Bids must be accompanied by a certified check, cashier's check or bid bond, • payable to the City of Shakopee, in the amount of one thousand five hun- dred dollars ($1,500.00). 2. Contract Period: The contract period shall commence as of the date of the award (approximately 3 -18 -80 ) and terminate 4 -9 -80 If an order is not placed prior to the termination date it shall be considered cancelled as of that date and the City shall not be liable for any claims by reason of cancellation. 3. General Specifications: The vehicle called for herein shall be new, currently advertised, standard production models (1980 model year, 1979 model year ac- ceptable). 4. Delivery: A. Bidders shall quote on the basis of delivered price and all quotations shall include all transporation and delivery charges. • B. The delivery point shall be the City of Shakopee or any reasonable location that may be designated by the City of Shakopee Finance Director. 5. Delivery Date: Bidders shall indicated on the attached Proposal Form the number of calendar days after receipt of order by which time the truck shall be delivered to the City. Purchase Order shall be issued to the successful bidder by 4 -4 -80 6. Proposal Form: All items on the Proposal Form shall be completed. 7. Manufacturer's Specifications: A complete set of manufacturer's specifications and illustrated description shall be furnished with each bid. 8. Warranty: The successful bidder shall furnish manufacturer's standard new truck warranty and shall promptly replace or repair defective material, parts, workmanship and /or inadequate design, at no cost to the purchaser, in accord- ance with such warranty. /'A Specifications for a Tandem Cab /Chassis Page 2 9. Manuals: One (1) parts manual and one (1) service manual shall be provided. Vehicle prices are not constructed to include the cost of such manuals. Bidders are requested to show a unit price per manual, as a separate charge. However, any bidder not showing a price for the manuals will be required to provide the manuals at no additional cost to the City. Vendor shall furnish operations manuals, repair manuals,lube charts, and parts books at the time of delivery. 10. Bid Security: Money deposited as represented by the certified check, cashier's check, or bid bond accompanying the proposal shall be held until delivery is completed. 11. Bid Award and Acceptance: Award shall be based on, but not necessarily lim- ited to the factors of price, delivery, experience with the product proposed, evaluation of the bidders ability to service the City in terms of the require- ments as called for in the specifications, general reputation and experience of bidder, the nature and extent of company data furnished with this bid or furnished upon request by the City at any time prior to bid award, financial responsibility of the bidder, size and location of bidder's facilities, quality of product or service, analysis and comparison of specifications detail, dis- count offered and bidder's ability to meet delivery requirements. The City reserves the right to award or reject any bids where such action is deemed to best serve the interests of the City of Shakopee. 12. Terms: Net thirty (30) days. 13. Deviations: Alternate bids or exceptions to specifications shall be made on a separate sheet of paper. • GV /klk TANDEM CAB CHASSIS Wheelbase: 194 -204 CA 126 -130 Frame: Section modulus including reinforcements not less than 15.9 with a rbm of not less than 1,749,000 inch lbs. Engine: Gasoline driven V8 design, 429 CID minimum, 4BBL carbuerator, full flow oil filter, fuel filter, air cleaner, governor. Transmission: Clark 390 Clutch: 2 plate 13" minimum Axles: Front 12,000# capacity minimum Rear 34,000# capacity minimum, tandem, two speed, 7 :17/9:77 ratios, interaxle differential, driver controlled lockout Springs: Front 6,000# capacity each minimum at ground Rear Hendrickson RU340 minimum Brakes: Service - Full air, minimum 12cfm compressor, rapid build up dual air tanks with wet tank located at low point in system, low air pressure buzzer, "s" cam brakes. Furnish and install air dryer with electric heating element. Parking -. Air parking brake. Steering: Power assist Electric: Alternator - 80 amp minimum Battery - 12 volt 77 amp minimum, maintenance free. Wheels and Tires: Cast spoke design, first line tube type tires 10.00 x 20 - 14 PR regular tread front,12 ply rear, mud and snow tread rear, rim size 8.0 2 pc, furnish spare rim. Furnish mechanical backup alarm R.R. Fuel Tank: 50 gallon capacity minimum Cab: Cab to include the following items; Dual sun visors and arm rests Dual exterior rear -view mirrors 6 "x16" retractable, 8" R.H. convex mirror Dual exterior grab handles Insulated head liner Heavy duty insulated rubber floor mats Full depth foam padded bench seat - H.D. vinyl Page 2- Tandem Cab Chassis Specifications Instruments: Standard panel including air pressure gauge Dual air horns Color: Fire Department red, Black frame Additional: Tow hooks - underside of front frame All hoses silicone • GV /klk / PROPOSAL To be opened 3 -10 -80 11:00 a.m. CST For the furnishing and delivery of Proposal of: a tandem cab /chassis for the City of Shakopee, in accordance with the attached specifications which were submitted with this Proposal and upon which this Proposal is made. Address: City, State and Zip Code: Phone: Tandem Cab /Chassis Price: Manuals Parts Service Make and Model of Vehicle Delivery Date of Vehicle GV /klk MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder City Administrator FROM: Gregg M. Voxland City Treasurer RE: Fire Department Equipment DATE: February 14, 1980 There is $3,000 in the budget for grass rig equipment. The Fire Department has been converting a military surplus 4 x 4 and they now need the tank and pump unit. I have two quotations for the equipment. The quote from Minnesota Warner is for $3,960. This is $14. higher than the quote from Mid Central but includes a 9 h.p. engine instead of a 7 h.p. engine. There is also $2,500. budgeted for fire hose which the Fire Department has determined it will not purchase this year. This will cover the difference on the grass rig equipment. Action: Motion to authorize purchase of grass rig equipment from Minnesota Warner in the amount of $3,960.00. GMV /jiw I® ,DfCN,I CITY OF SHAKOPEE i 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 1:,-:, :'K . � 1 a MEMO ' T o : Douglas S. Reeder City Administrator FROM: Jim Karkanen Public Works Manager SUBJECT: Engine Analyzers DATE: February 14, 1980 The Public Works Department has recently received quotations from three different manufacturers for an engine analyzer, to be used by the City mechanic for tuning and servicing engines in the Public Works Maintenance' shop. This engine analyzer will be replacing a Sun "Model 740" engine analyzer which has been outdated for several years because of its inability to test and tune the newer engines in our fleet. We are virtually testing and tuning all of our newer engines "by ear" because of the sophisticated ignition systems, and lean burn pollution packages provided, on all of the newer engines. The advantages of the newer analyzer over our current engine tester are as follows: 1. Infra -red exhaust emission - enables us to measure exhaust carbon- . monozide and hydro- carbon emissions as pollutants and to insure accurate carburetor settings. . 2. Test engine and electrical voltages up to 25 volts - necessary on vehicles which use a 24 volt electrical system, such as loader, grader° and military type vehicles. 3. Fuel injection features - we believe that many vehicles will be converting to fuel injection systems in the near future such as staff cars, possibly squad cars, etc. 4. .The newer analyzers are better equipped to test and analyze four cylinder engines than our current Sun "Model 740 ". We believe that our staff cars, etc. may possibly soon be of the four cylinder class. The newer analyzers can isolate these cylinders and -test one cylinder at a time for "power balancing ", to isolate a cylinder for bad valves, cam shaft problems, compression, etc. This gives us a better method of isolating "bad cylinders" for trouble shooting. • The "bad cylinder" can be isolated on the oscilloscope so the mechanic can compare it to other cylinders. This will also show spark and dwell irregularities on the scope when the pattern is " upshifted" (or isolated) . 5. Venturi vacuum pump - This feature enables us to connect the machine to the engine vacuum (at any location on the engine) and introduces pressure to the system while the engine is off. Thus, it enables us to trace any vacuum problems or leaks on the vehicle. Before this feature was introduced, the mechanics had to work on a trial and error basis because vacuum pressure was on the whole engine system. . • ° � (now the testing can be isolated on a certain system because the engine analyzer can provide the vacuum for the testing. 6. The newer analyzer features a "no start" cranking test which enables us to test and measure vehicle starting systems. We can measure amperage "drain" on the battery and starter, by cranking the engine through the tester system. This will also then measure coil pickup, voltage through the spark plug wires, point dwell while the engine is cranked through the tester. 7. The newer analyzers can test and measure magnetic timing which is used on some vehicles in our fleet today. The magnetic timing is generally used on vehicles which feature "lean burn" engines. 8. The newer analyzers also can load up the electrical systems to test the lighting systems wiring, alternators, charging rate, etc. This enables us to determine if the charging rate is proper. The quotations are as follows: "Marquette" Model 40 -880 $6,810.40 (includes trade -in) Auto Tech, Inc. Roseville, MN "Sun" Model 1115 $7,278.80 (includes trade -in) Sun Elect. Corp. Eden Prairie, MN "Pulsar" Model 976 $5,300.00 (includes trade -in) Chacago,IL Auto Central (Shakopee) We're recommending that we accept the proposal from Auto Tech, Inc. of Roseville for • the "Marquette" Model 40 -880 engine analyzer for $6,810.40. This tester,was by far more impressive and superior to the other testers. The Pulsar ($5,300.00) couldn't provide the infra -red exhause emission testing feature which is a $2,500.00 item. The digital readout of the Marquette 880 was far superior to the•standard gauges of the Sun1115. The best feature of the Marquette tester is that the electronic component system inside of the tester is placed in separate slide -in modules. If phe car manufacturers introduce a newer engine feature which outdates the Fester, a module can be removed and updated, or replaced with a module which has the newer circuitry built in. This also features easier repair po the analyzer, by simply removing the defective circuitry and replacing 1.t. Also, this machine has space for additional modules to be inserted • j.n case of newer features to be added to the tester. This feature will lessen the chance of our tester being outdated within a few years. The ,sun machine can not offer this feature. • rb The City of Crystal has just purchased a Marquette 40 -880 and had nothing but praise for its' performance. They previously had a Sun machine. The Capital Fund has $5,000 for the engine analyzer, so we're suggesting that some of the money for the brake drum machine in our budget be used for the purchase of the tester. We feel that the purchase of the analyzer is far more important than the brake drum machine. We can look for a used brake drum machine at a later date. This engine analyzer is not to.be confused with the "computer" type analyzers on the market. This Marquette analyzer will, however, offer the same testing procedures with a digital readout, but does not offer a "print out" feature. We feel that the newer type engine analyzer is vital to our tuning, testing and adjusting of the engines of the City fleet. JK: nae • • O ) 6 • Af 4 �1 tie �. utote ;ti 2448 Prior Avenue North • Roseville, Mu rio sota 55113 • (612) 633 -2536 • December 26, 1979 Jim Karkane City of Shakopee Public Works Department Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Jim: Enclosed is some additional information on the Marquette 40 -880 Oscilloscope analyzer w /dual scale HC /CO Infra -Red Instrumentation which you and Perry requested. I have noted some of the features of the 880 as a comparison to Sun's 1115 model. Some of these are included on the 1115A model, however, many important features are not. Some of these are: ,Screen size -- although both have a 19" diagonal measurement, the Sun has only an 10" sweep vs. Marquette's 16" • sweep. Pattern shift - -Sun has no shift available for critical • diagnosis of points open /module off portion where problems such as dwell irregularities occur. Pattern upshift- -While Sun can upshift one cylinder over • their parade pattern, Marquette can upshift one or any number of cylinders for comparative purposes. Control Module Marquette's accessory test leads Distributor Pick up allow you to perform tests on these Fuel Infection and many other electronic devices that are becoming so prominent on today's vehicles. Digital read out and Used on Marquette 880 on all functions prompter lights other than tachometer and vacuum to give accurate and easy to read info - mation on the test performed with no confusion as to what scale is on or what mode one is reading or testing from. • • • Expanded tach - -5 RPM accuracy on cylinder balance or carburetor adjustment - -an absolute necessity for the sensitivity of today's vehicles. Full vacuum testing functions- -not just a vacuum gauge but a calibrated vacuum source. Full self calibration built in - -No need for random service calls if there are any questions on the accuracy of your equipment. Marquette allows you to check it yourself, giving you full assurance of accuracy at any time and gives you instant knowledge on lead problems (70% of all service calls) while the machine is operating. Adaptability -- Probably Marquette's biggest advantage - -the scope is designed to be updated consistently- -every part and portion, including the infra -red, so that it will not become obsolete. Your investment is a solid one no matter what Detroit does to the • vehicles. As I said, these are but some the more important features of Marquette over Sun equipment. In addition, you 'get the unparalleled training and support of Auto Tech as I described in my first letter. I'also feel that our price is competitive as quoted below: 40 -880 Marquette Oscilloscope analyzer with dual scale HC /CO Infra Red List Price $ 9995.00 Your Price 7196.00 Less trade Sun 740 00.00 ' $ 6 41 -444 Cylinder Leakage Tester $ 114.00 These prices are good until February 1, 1980 at which time Marquette will have a price increase. Please make your decision carefully, Jim. I honestly feel that no one can compare features with Marquette, especially features that are important for today's and tomorrow's vehicles. Sinc r y yours, _. ' �� L_____ ....... Tom Bur son r TBB /ne i Jo QUOTATION and BID To: City of Shakopee DAT 1 2-14 - 500 Gorman Street _ REQUEST Shakopee, MN 55379 REPLY TO • ATTN. Jim Korkanen Gentlemen: 12-14-79 This is our Quotation as per your Request dated /or the following items. Item Quantity Model and Description See Net Ext. Exhibit Unit Price 1 Sun 1115 Infra -Red engine performance tester 7628.80 - w /Mag -81 and CCL-82 and all other adapters and accessories. • Less trade 740 Scope and Vat -26 tester 350.00 total $7278.no Terms. 30 days F.O.B. _ Plus All State and Federal Taxes Where Applicable. Delivery 5 days _ days after Receipt of Firm P.O. Price Firm for 30 days Thank you for your request and may we be of further service to you. Very Truly Yours Su Electric Cor • . i PI �v ' _ ,r ■/, • • ,`i •, �}t ` � •a,� p � " 't f � T � I ,� N h 1 +� ryl� r {�. 'i t 34 , ,rt `'� �... a ' y 1 • k,., Y q L ,4 J , 7t n 51 . y i y '�" (M F ' 04: 1 n. . r'lr' $t '{x is 6'.. 1 4!v 6, 4 , 2 ,_,:t �• �y V i�4 . 1t .' / ELECTRIGCORPORATIONtee LECTRIC CORPORATION i ;� Y Y, l Ast ..•aU Vi' { lifer,. y ` r' i 4 „ 4 y '• s . , �r v b �t ..rgw a �-4 R�,,, � " : � ..H �u , s ht �t� k:'>,7u .�•r) 2YSTAL LAKE, ILLINOIS 60014 • 815- 459 -7700 • CECIL L. MATHESON ZONE MANAGER Printed in U.S.A. Minneapolis South Region: 14850 Martin Drive „ rd..,, Pr, rir MinnpSn'•:; 'phnp.. !'.r71 Q,7 .r.,1- „_ . I 0 K ....., . . t_ i . i i , . crto ITY of 9HAKQPEE . . ... _.__.. CHECK REGISTER ' _._ -_- -- -- __•- -_-;- — •__ -_ 02 14 a0 PAGE 1 '. I CHECK NO. DATE 1 - . AMOUNT . VENDOR .,,-.:.•.',.,,.:.;'..,..,::!:-.....:. M .; ITE DESCRIPTION i ACCOUNT N0. INV. a P.0, q MESSAGE • h • • j • j 005003 02/14/80 139,94 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINT, 01 =4232 ®321 ®32 Ia eft 139.94* 16 j1 .'i * * * * *# i ' ' 1_ 045006 02/1 '4/80.._ . __.... _. _ .: .2.31 ;.00.. -_. _......:._.A IR.COMM_____ _�_— _. ::.:� ` ..00Mt4.SYST MAINJ..._--- ,- . : .__01..4233 - 11 3 1.3z7b3j_;__. -_ ri 0 02/14/80 30.00 AIRCOMM COMM.SYST.M 01.4233 321 - 32.32727 — -- _ „ " , ! 261,00 * ,• - _ ..... _.._.... - - -- - - -- - -- - - --• -- • -• - -- - - - - - ---t i' * * * ** *a¢�C1c9� I' , t; r i • ” • 0 0 ?/14/80 3, 690 �.__. BRAUN ENGINEERLNG. ;'° •. ENGRo.SE:RV_ICE,8_ • __ - ___ . 56 4312.911 91 • 53612 - � ; 3,690,25 * ' i . ; 1,:-: • i• * * * * ** * ** -CKS t ( 11" •` 0+ • • 0 ?/14/80 • 198,07 CLAYS PRINTING '`,...t.. PRIG, & REPRO. • 01 =4351- 121 - 12.3617, • •I : i ,''. 198.07_. *.. - - - - -.: �__.. __ _ — =._ 't CI !` : , * *# * ** * ** -CKS • I . . ' 005091 02/1 . 300,00 ' -- DON�NELL CO, BLDG,MAINT. • 01- 4211 - 622=62 ° - 71 • 045091 02/14/80 1,770.00 DONNELL CO. ...SIGNS 01- 4250 - 421 -42 , 2+.070.00 # # # # *# * ** - CKS Li 045093 02 /14/80 7.38 DUNNING 3 HOWE. VEHICLE MAINT. :01- 4232 - 321 -32 5019 7 * - 1 f 0 02 /10 /P0 - --• 10,25 -- . LATOUR_SHOE_STORE — _____ EQUIP.MA ____ — _ 01 74230 - 621 762 10.25 * _ — -- ___,_______[...1 * * * CK$ cd r r 1 0 02/14/80 18.27 LATHROP PAINT SUPPLY BLDG. MAINT. 01 -0231- 181 -18 35811 j °: 18.27 * • # #* -CKS' �1 045327 02/14/80 3.70 LANO IMPLEME"'T ___...._ EGUIP.MAINT. 01 -4230- 421 -42 118127 _. �; 3.70 * - I' i,, * * * * ** ' * ** -CKS r j Ise ct 1 .... , ; .0 02/10/80 • 3,239,45 _ • MILAN. ALLEY. FENCE ._._. ..... NLUGS. &STRUCTURE 01- 4508 - 421 -42 _..__ ... �._- ...._.. _- ic 1- 045336 02/14/80 5,720.55 M1NN.VALLEY FENCE dLUGS.6STRUCTURE 21 - 911 -91 I:„ �: 8, * .mot. l ,i • •• -_• - - _.. I%. t ** i't'j * * * * ** it-CKSM Iv. .•` • 045302 (12/1 000.00 "0oDY5 INNVESTORS .... OTHER PROF,StRVICES 2 4315 - 911 -91 -.. ...___________ ..._._13) . -•; • 1. . 1979 CITY OF SHAKOPEE CHECK REGISTER 02 14 80 PASE 2 C. i CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT _ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. P.O. # MESSAGE I' l'i 400.00* • _ }r }'w a***** . a* *-CKS IT • • I 045405 02/14/80 • 140098.82 " ORFEI .R "SONS " • OTHER ,IMPROVEMENTS 56 - =911 -91 r° ■-! 14009.8,82.. * ,� 1. as * * ** ** *mCKS }'' • • i• 045"12 0 .. -. - - - O85 16 • - ^ --- . __ .- _ . PITNE.Y BITE - -.. g .7.7 W i z - f a - T O W P.RNtL, • - - -• 01011383 - 121.12' -- --- - ---7--- l" ( .j" 285076 a ,,., { i ■ i•• 045414 02/14/80 19.40 PAKO FILMSHOPS • GENERAL SUPPLIES . 01•4220 - 141.14 041382 �' . , .. ! i 0 02/14/80 , 970.22 - SHAKOPEE VALLEY PUS. LEGAL NOTICES 01 -4350- 121 -12 I;, I . 045479 02/14/80 74.05. SHAKOPEE VALLEY PUB, LEGAL NOTICES 01- 4350 - 131 -13 ,; . • 045479 02/14/80 - -- 29.57 - ----- 3H4KQPEE- VALLE9- PUR:---` LEB7 [C "NOTItE3- ..--- ...--- - - - -13 ®4350= 911= 9i------- _----------- -- - - -- - ' -- _. "'' 045479 02/14/80 54.27 SHAKOPEE VALLEY.PUB'' - -•LEGAL NOTICES • 23. 4350.911 -91 i' I • 045479 02/14/80. . _.• • _ 81. A1 -___ - EG LEGAL NOTICES .24- 4350- 911.91 '„ 045479 02/14/80 50.07 SHAKOPEE VALLEY PUB. LAL Nt1fiICE'S' - - - - - 55;4$50;913a91 - - - - - - -- - - -� ' • - ••� 1,358.99 ,358.99 * 1 :', • _.._. . ----- -_... -- �I I ' 0 02/14/80 10108,64 • SUBURBAN ENG. ' ENGR.9ERVICE9 01- 4312.411 -41 ___._..__.__ ___ __._ 1 ; •. 045488 02/14/80 14,951.00 SUBURBAN ENG. EMGR .SERVICES__..._._.- °-- •-- - - -56- 4312- 911�g1 • � - °. 16,059.64 * i • 045489 02/1.4/80 27;03 SUPER 11MERIC --- --•--- - :..__.- GENERA[ SUPPLIES• - -- 01= 4220 ;31131 • 045489 02/14/80 1.91 SUPERAMERICA MOTOR FUELS • 01- 4222.311 -31' r! . . !r :i _:2 • • • 045532 02/14/80 12.114 SA }J0 MECHAAIICAL - - 7 BLOC, h.AINT. - 01 •4 2•1621 • 62 2412 i •! 12.14 * , - r} • 045533 02/14/80 27.18 SUNOANCE MEDICAL OTHER PROF.SERVICES 01- - 121 -12 HI ''' 0.45533 02/14/F0 41.00 ' SUNDANCE MEDICAL OTHER PROF.SERVICES 01- 4315- 321 -32 ;;; �. !''1 68.18 * -, '', * * * * ** * * * -CKS • - 1 -, 045535 02/14/80 2.909,75 SEARS. CAPITAL 18 °OTHER 01- 4509- 1 -18 ' __I `I 2,908.75 * ,,, N, * * * * ** , . * * *- CK p " a 1': . 17,1 1 • •, i 0 - 02/14i80 • 175.00 XEROX CORP. OFFICE E1!JI1'.R!•1TL. 01 - 311 -31 b06052 1.�• • • . .., , .. . _ • . . _ ______ ............_ . 1--- ' . . . • Li_; i . ' . . ... 197q CITY OF SHAKOPEE CHECK REGISTER 02 14 80 PAGE 3 1 '. . . .. . CHECK mO. DATE AMOUNT '. ' .: - VENDOR' • . - - '•:-• -•••• ITEM DESCRIPTION 'ACCOUNT' NO. INV. a P.O. 4 ESSAGE • • ' 1 „ . " .., r ' . . ,, . . . . , • , . .. , , . , 175.00 * ! . , ! „ -------- *3 ( rd 045601 02/1 16.00 . ZIEGLER INC . - ',:.. ".. ',: EDUIP O MAINT. • -.- ;:' . • ; •. 01. 36517 - , , ..• ' - '. ' •• 1 1-; ( I '1 ****** • ***-CKS ;41 . 1,1 . w .-, 4543 ' 01/22/80 144.07 . DOUGLAS YESS - • . -... .• PT • SALARIES • . ,-, 144.07 *, . . , : ',, • . ' ',-. , .i. .• " - ' ' -. ' - : •,' - : • . :. • -' :!,:i •ii- H . - - ........,.- • . t ‘'', . ;. '• 4552 01/22/80 28 90 ALDY GRAPHIC ' GEN SUPPLIES 01-4220-411-41 • PAUL t r . ' __.-__ . . .. 4553 01/22/80 .._. ___ ,27,82...... -14AKPAI. _._, ..L.. .1` - ,, VEHICL ,..KAPi:(.::................._, 01•1232321-3 MANUAL 27.82 * ,.. 4550 01/22/80 . ......_ 12,62 BETHANY_CORp GENOUPPLIES 71-4220-911-91 . mANuhL . 12.62 * • . ' , :..1 . .1 .- -, • - • , , .. . . . 1 ' • 4555 n1/22/80 ... 145.00 • _CONT4RESEAR_CM • ' ,. - • ..CHEmIc48......... /.....____ .... ._-_01.'4 ___ UA!.. _11 . ■ - 145.00 * HI 01/22/80 153. COmMERCIAL ASPHALT PATCHING mAT. 01- mANUAL • 153.95 * • • ( :' .. . ....... 4557 01/22/80, . , ... 28.88 .DENNIS RuFF.,___st_oc.....mA.INT ._ - ....____:_. 0 1 r u 2.1710 ..le ___tqiuni. ______ J.,• 28.88 * ...I .L 4550 01/22/80 0,R8 TROY puenis BLDG. MAINT. 01-4231-181-18 PANU4L icr -1 I 8 84 8 * . . • f 1 1:1 • 4559 01/22/80 .. . 45.00 _ . __LEROY, DELL.1 . _____ ____.___ ,MA INT . 01•4231-1.f1.1.•1 45.00 * ' I 456n nt/22/80 : 1 DRE5SEN... _..,... A - 190.25*- - 1-, , ! Fl 4561 . 01/22/80. 1.50 ENABLERS ' • . ' DUES.SUBSCR/PTION 01-4391-311-31 mANUhL 1 .-- . _ 7.50 * k1 _456? \ 01/22/80 3.80 RAY FOSLID ' MILEAGE 01-4330-321-32 MANUhL 1."1 .... ... .. . _. . r•:‘; 3.80 * 1 - • ; 9 ,..i 4563 01/22/80 . . , .40. o o ... . . . HENN, TECNCTPs. CONF 1,. SCHOOLS 40.00 * I-0 p . ...-1 , 4560 01/22/80 • 46.38 GREG HERGOTT . BLDG. MAINT. 01- ! irr 46.38 * • .:,.1 . V] • I , _4565 . 01/2/R0.. 55.20 1NDTRIAL RPUSH GEN.SMPPLIES 01 ANUAL ____P . . ... . • ' . . . .. . ._ ______ ... ____ ... • -- • •., . . . . . • ' I . , ! . • . . • 1979 CITY OF 5NAKOPEE . • CHECK REGISTER 02 14 80 PAGE 4 . . CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT . VENDOR . . • -'-', 7 . ITEM DESCRIPTION . •.^...,.• ..- . . ACCOUNT No. 1'v. a P.O. a MESSAGE 1 • LI 4565 01/22/80 - .42.60 GEN.SUPPLIES 01-4220-441-44 - • MANuAL I ( I , ' 4565 01/22/00. . 69.15 • - - • GEN.SUPPLIES 01-4220-621-82 • mANUAL 1 - .!TIII , • 166.95 * I?", 11 • 4586 . . . . . . . ..- . •- i' I 01/22/80 . - 213.53 ••INST. SERVICES ': ' -' 01-4233-311‘.31.•-:•'. *:,•. '1- MANUAL • • ..... . . l' • Fn ( " 4587 01/22/80 19.76 GEORGE JOHNSON MILEGE *01- 4 330-141-'14 - MANUAL ,.., • 19.76 * : ,.. . . . . . . . .. • . . . , - • ,. -, • . - ' • ( r 4566 01/22/80 , 84,00 ' CHAD KRAAyENBRINK.r, ::: '--. BLDG, MAIN/. - " .01042314;181 : ' . . ..- : MANUAL' 84 00 * ',.. - • , -,., - „ i:.: - ; : ,-: ; . ,. : • '. _ - - ......• - - . .. • . •. : : IT1 • (.. ;.- 4569 01/22/80 198,00 NID-CENTRAL FIRE .. ' GEN: SUPPLIES • 01-4220-321-32 0ANuAL i• • . • 198.00 * I" • • ... ,•, i I ' . - ..% .• . : : • . . . • ,:r 1 d ( 1 ' 4570 01/22/80 924430 : - ARNOLD .„,..,.'•••-••: PROF. SERVICES 24-4315-911°91 - ',.. • : ,.• MANUAL h% :. •••( !, 1 _ . •924,30 • : • ::-'.:-•.•:.", .- •:: . ... - .',: - •.• -• -• •:" . - ..I- . i• j ( ! ' 457, 01/22/80 7.22 GENE PASS . MILEAGE 01- . mANuAL •:,,■- ; • ... _7.22 * h . -- 1 ( • 4572 01/22/80 19,25 • . JIM REINKE -.., ' ': BLDG, MAINT.', - 01-4231-181-18 : . *- - MANUAL • 'CI : ■ t 19.25 * _ • . - t , . . . 1:•:1 .... 4 573 . • 01/22/80 19.25 808 RIES BLDG: RAIN/. - AIN/. 01-4231-181-18 • : MANUAL 19.25 * 1 A . .. • . . ._ , . ... .. __ ._. _ _ . . ._ _ ___________. ________ _____________ .........______ _ ___ -• ____ _ .. . .- 4574 01/P2/81 55.00 . __ _55.00 * . REV.sHRG. ADV.SERV. , - •BOOKS' . • 01-0394-151-15 • • 0 • (, 4575 01/22/80 20.00 ED SIEBENALER GEN.SUPPL/ES 01-4220-421-42 MANUAL 1 20.00 * • ..:' ' .. 1 • • 1 (: 4576 01/22/8n 11.00 STATE BD/ASSESSORS LICENSES • 01-4392-141-14 . •41ANUAL 4 A • ; LI • -. 11.00 * 4577 01/22/80 80.00 ST. CLOUD UNIV. • SCHOULS _ 01-4390-311-31 mANuAL 80.00 * 0 1,• . .. .. . . - ' r 4578 01/22/8n 13,757.52 STATE TRES> . ' FICA REMIT. • 81-4922-911-91 • MANUAL H rd L 4574 01/22/80 '12.00 VALLEY TIRE VEHICLE MAIN/. 01-4232-311-31 A'ANuAL I- !. • • 12.00 * . . .•., 1.. 4580 . 01/22/80 3,070.1 VAN SICLE A ASSOC. ENG. SERVICES 01-4312-331-33 . . vANUAL • r's i 45 01/22/80 370.10' VAN SICLE A ASSOC. . EmG. SERVICES . 01-4312-331-33 ' MANUAL ,J 1. Lisa 01/22/80 370.18 VAN SICLE A ASSOC. ENG. SERVICES 01-4312-331-33 fANUAL ...* 4580 01/22/80 - 370.18- VAN SICLE & ASSOC. ENG. SERVICES • 01.4312-331-33 pANUAL I- ; 4580 , 01/22/An 370.18 VA-1 SICLE !I. ASSOC. EQG. SERVICES 01-4312-331-33 . • mANUAL ., • r . 4580 01/22/80 . 370.18- _ VA' SICLE A AS EN SOC. - G. SERVICES 01-4312-33133 ' -7- ------ nNVAL 01/22/80 370.18 VAN SICKLE F. ASSOC. . ENG. SEPVICES . 01-4312331-33 mANUAL v,I • (7 a58n . 1,1 . 3,070.18 * . • • ,..12 ._ .. . . . . .. - • . . . ._. __. . _ . . ._ .. .... .. . __-____ . . . . • '~ . 0- � -. .‘ ^ . '.--- � - "i � L..-1 . • . , . . • •• 1 , _ 1979 cIry OF SHAKOPEE [| � ' ( ~/ CHECK O. DATE VENDOR , Accnu�r �wv # r u n MESSAGE �{ _ ^ � AMOUNT ' � - - �� 4581 01v22/80 2012.50 VIKING PIPE *°ur SERVICES 0100315-451-45 -°'"~L • (. . 4S8� 01/22/80 '�� ' . '. s n � 01/22/80 �. - - '��-�� T� sc * *u � �' 9 o � � WEBER * �xuoc v� ~�"y_��^- � ° ° (|"| WEBER 7 S w' 01..0511321.•32 ,| • ' ' _ • . 3.i60.94 __ ~_'_' (.` ***°»* "*" C"6 . ` ii,,,, 01/22/80 � �� • �� ----'--- �Lhzm -MENDEN T *»«� • ( '| 1.786.71 ^ ` I' . �� ' - |' oSpr 01/22/80 24-4990-911.-91 ~ *u«L (`1 [ . cv 2z " . . !1 0598 • 01/22/80 A[Ol8 (`� ' � ?••'/l . . '- . ` - —'-----�-- u k - . 4599 01/22/e0 45.16 JEANNE ANDRE MILEAGE 15;4330-191-19 `°-"^` / ( | 1 � - ^ ! -, �aov o��c�oo � 1037.00 IoB[nm nzsmcnncns ��.� 'PLANNING � vx~43;v~^'^1' �w""~� . , • ) (| | . ` ` ` • � , . . . . -' � • :: ' l °^^^^° ^~^- cKu 1 �** v/ run� 11 TOTAL ., �� ' 28.57 • FUND ^~ ....^ • . /_-` ' 45.16 . ( ~ � TOTAL 5020,55 ---- -~ ---^ -'--: -------^ ------------'----� --------'------- ----'- ----------' • '-- � /'i . 54^27 FUND 23 TOTAL | • 3071.07 ruwo 24 TOTAL | . 150"07 FUND s5 TOTAL ' 32.740.07 - — r � - ! FUND 56 TOTAL ' ( i • 12"62 • FUND 71 TOTAL . ` . t: .13.757652_ ' '_- - pVNn'81'Jo.T.AL_-'---_-' ` —_-_� �� !,� . 78022.05 • TOTAL . ` ' ..| . '------------'�—��`�'� � r , Li . . ''' _ ... . - ' ' . -- '.� __--__�---_--�----_______� -__' I:I • . _ .... __ _ • _ . _ • . - .- _- - - . ' . .- - - . _ ----- -,. -- __--- ..... _ - ' --- ' -_ - ... _- --- _'--_-- `-- `- ' W .1 . - � - � - . - - ' - - - _-. _ � - - - � � • ' � _ --' ___.- -- - ' �---__'-- / i' . . ' • C4 "It L] � C� • . :-.1.... ' � - —_ _- � - � . - � � " ' . . i . . liip priTv OF SHQKOPEE • CHECK REGISTER 02 14 80 PAGE 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT •VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NC'. INV. # P.O. N.NESSAGE 04500 02/14/80 102.00 ADAMS PEST CONTROL OTHER PROF ;SERVICE' 01 -4315- 16336 064211 I' I • 102.00 * . *** -CKS • 1. 045008 , 02/14/80 .. .._...- :- - ---- °259.96.-- _ __._.AIR -COMM -.._ ----._.--_ _. ..._:_�CP. .MM .$YST.MA1MT._..•- -- ,01- 4233311 °31 • • ;' I 045008 1)2/14/80 139.72 AIR COMM • COMM.SYST.MAINT. 01 -4233- 321 -32 ' _.-.__.___.__..____ _ ____._._._____ :'1 0 02/14/80 i•3.50 AIR COMM - COt•SM.SYST.MAINT. • 01 °4233- 421 -42 I''I 1)13.18 * ,- ` CKS rl 045014 02/14/80 40 AMERICAN NAT. BANK PRINCIPLE PYMT. 45.4610 911 -91 ' - '1 045014 02/14/80 8.045.00 AMERICAN NAT. BANK INTEREST PYmT. 454611- 911 -91 ('1 045014 02/14/80 _ -__ • _ 3 . -- • .._. - -.- 7.00 AMERICAN NAT. HANK _ AGENT FEES __- _.___• _ _ __ - 45- 4612 - 911 -91 I, i 045014 02/14/80 , 85.000.00 AMERICAN NAT; HANK _ - PR Pit IOU PYMT. -_ 54- 461U;911 -41 - -- ------------- 04501 02/14/8 196265.00 AMERICAN NAT. BANK INTEREST PYMT. 54 -4611- 911.91 • 1• 045014 02/14/80 •... -• .-_ 73. 66..:_ - --..__.AMER • ICAN • .NAT.__BANK_. '_ _„._AGENT.•, FEES_.... .:..__.' __-. -6 81 91 9 ----- _____,.____.____.__._-. - _- • I'•! 152.420.66 * - • • 1 * * * *** ** *-CKS._ „l 3 ; "� 045017 02/14/80 10.26 ANDERSON ELECTRIC GENERAL SUPPLIES • 01- 4220 - 42142 .. . . -_ ___:..10.26 • I * - -_.. _ • i L 1 ; ri oun2r.C 02/14/80 95 ;60 - APwp- _ - _- - - SitHOUlS 6 CONFR.- . ___-7-0F.4340= 4i1 =41 -_ _ ....._ . --- ' - 7 -- - 0 95.00 * . • - ._...._..._.._... - - -- *- CKS 1 . 04502 02/14/80 85.00 ASCE ..... - _ - -- - DUES R SURSCR. I • : _ 01 -4391- 411 -41 • 1-1 85.00 * Li I ; • 045026 02/14/80 19.95 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY SMALL TOUL PURCH. 01- 4225 - 4 -44 - 0 02/14/80 50.51 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY • EOUIP.MAINT. 01 -4230- 621 -62 _ I 045026 02/14/80 . 12.95 - AUT0 CENTRAL SUPPLY• - - ' -- • MAINT. 01-4232 Si1 045026 02/14/80 • . 113.88 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY ' VEHICLE MAINT. 01 -4232- 321 -32 I' 045026 02/14/80 -.. 38.94 .... AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY...... VEHICLE MAINT. . .01- 4232 - 421 -42 •_. !': 045026 02/14/80 86.71 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINT. 01- 4232 621 -6 2 322.94 * 1. 1 045027 . 02/14/80 29. JEANhNE - TRAVEL Exp. 15 -4330- 191 -19 . 2 * • ._...... .... . ._.. * * * _ • 045030 02/14/80 18.50 ASSN METPO.MUN. SCHf & CONF. 01 -4390- 111 -11 1 •I 045030 02/1 9.25 ASSN.t'ETPO.NUN. - SCHOOLS & CONF. 01° 121 - 12 „'. 2 * • 0-45831 =9 ?:/4 71.00 ALlY GRAPHIC GFNFRAL SHFcLits 01- 4 [20- u11 -41 9.12.:1-6 r 1980 CITY OF SHAKOPEE --- ...._ -- _CHECK- REGISTER.._. - _ ____ .._._ . _ ... _ .____..__._ _ -__ 14 80 PAGE' • 2 I CHECK ENO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEm DESCRIPTION ACCOUN1 NO: INV. 4 P.O. ,4 MESSAGE Ii 7.1.00* !ill * * * * ** , * ** -CKS 1 "{ 045051 02/14/80 49442.61 BANKERS LIFE - • = REMIT-8 L 81 , .. { .4,442.61_ : - _.:.- 0 045052 02/14/80 • 47.79 BATTERY WHSE,INC, VEHICLE MAIMT. 01 =4232- 421 - 42••5182 47, *..._. - - ... - ....._._.. .... j' 045053 02/14/80 24,20 BERENS GENERAL SUPPLIES - 01-4220-311-31- . • . I , ; , � _ .. __ _._ ___._24.20•_ *.._.__ •_ --_ - -- ----._ � ._.____:___— ...:..:.'____.._�.. ._:__<.._ : :_...___ -- � �- I ''i * * ** ** * ** °CKS • 1 014 505 8 02/14/80 5.00 GEORGE BREEGGEMANN DUES' 6 SU89CR, - 01 491 32- 32'____..__. _. J ^j 5.00 I J! . • - _ _.... - _ .�._ _..._ _._._.._ _.....__ __ -- -- _ ** — ChS h ': 045065 02/14/80 1,197.90 - BUSINESS FURNITURE _CAPITAL OFC.EDUIP._ _ .01 451233.1 -33 18392 ! , , 10197.90 *. e ; -- - _ - * * *- ui I 045068 02/14/80 150.00 THOMAS G. BR0W1IELL TRAVEL EXPENSE _ 01- 4330-311 -31 1 150.00 * -- - __..._ - - -•._— -- - - - - — - -- - - . — ;,,� . * ** -ChS • :1 0 02/14/80 20.00 CAPESIUS AGENCY • LIAB.INS. 01 -4360- 311 -31 1 , 045n82 02/14/80 211.00 CAPESIUS AGENCY LIAB.INS. .22- 4360 - 911 -91 f 2 31. 0 0*..__.._ I. * ** -CKS ,,1-.1, 045093 02/14/80. 62.50 CHASKA MEDICAL CTR. OTHER PROF.SERVICE 01- 4 31.5 - 321 -32 itd 62.50 * i * * * * ** * -CK I- I ' , 045102 02/14/80, . , - COPY EOUIP.. INC. _, _ _, . APITAL OFC.EQUIP. 01- 451,2 - 4.11 -4t. 7 .- 490.00 * ..; * * * -GKS ! 'E 045105 02/14/80 2.00 CYS STANDARD VEHICLE M1INT, 01- 4232 - 331 -33 5211 ' . ............. -_... . -- - -... _ _ _. • .__, 045106 02/14/8n 1,469.15 JULIUS A. COLLER II LEGAL SERVICES 01 -4310- 161 -16 { 'I 1, I * ** -CKS _" 1145 30 -02./1:4/80 8.77 nU!!NTNGS HD?‘E. - . GENERAL SUPPLIES 01- 4226.421 -42' 1980 CITY OF SHAKOPFE • __ ... CHECK REGISTER _..__ ......_ '_- -- 02 1 80 PAG ._._.j._,__ - -. . ' "' CHECK NO. DATE • AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NQ. INV. tt.P,U, # MESSAGE• u _ .---- - -i. . -_._ ,- __ ...___.___..,__- G ENERAL SUPPLIES 01-42 421. _ ICI 0 5130 02 /t 4/84 2 1.64 DUFlNINGS HDWE. • 045130 02/14/80 3.38 DUNNINGS HDWE, GENERAL SUPPLIES 01- 4220 - 621 -62 1 045130 02/14/80 • . _ •_ 25.74 _ _._•_•_ . _• DUNNINGS HDP1E, GENERAL SUPPLIES 01- 1220- 622 -62 _ ._...__._ ..,_ _ • SMALL TOOL PURCH. ' _ __- . - -_ . -- ._. -_ 1� 0 02/14 /80 13.33 OUNNINGS ND wE . '• � - '01- 422S- 421m42 -�• 045130 02/14/80 11.33 DUNNINGS HDWE.• SMALL TOOL PURCH. 01- 4225 - 621-62• r 0 02/14/80. _._..__ 15.P0. HDWE,_,.- _' ERUTP.MAINT, _ , 01- 4230 - 4 1 � 045130 02/14/80 12.68, DUNNINGS HDWE, BLDG.NAINT. 01- 4231 - 181 -18 , 0 02/1 2.65 DUNNINGS HOVE. BLDG.1AINT. 01- 4231- 622 -62 I' 1 045130 02/14/80 9.90 DUNNINGS HDWE ' BLDG,MAINT, '01-4231-639-62' { 045130 02/14/80 1.26 ' RUNNINGS HDWE: _ _ _ - VEHICC M$INY, - 01 4232 ®32 m3? _. - _. _.._ __.....__ • • I' 125.68 * , 045133 02/14/80 64.35 w S.DARLEY GENERAL SUPPLIES 01- 4220 - 421 -42 K19541 _ - 1 64,35 * ii 4 045134 02/14/80. •._ . ___._:___- B5-. IO _..____:____EA _______ _, _ FUELS __.--- _-- ..__._.__._ -4222- 321-32 ------------ - -. 1'; 045130 02/14/80 - 30.00- EARL F.DRESSEN MOTOR FUELS 01 - 422 - 4 2 1 =4 2 440539 55.10 * 045147 '02/14/80 . .._ ..._ 24, - - EASTMAN DRUG _- __' ___..__ GENERAL SUPPLIES 01 . - •._._.._-- - - 4220 - 311 - - 24.08 * % - ' - I -; * * * -CKS • 1 1 ' , 045151 02/14/80 21.33 ENVELOPE SALES - OFFICE •SUPPLIES 01 -4210- 311 -31 621236 1 1 - 21.33 * - .- -- -- _ __.__ _- _..__.__._._..:__..__._... -._ * * * * ** * **-CK9 I , •; o45i70 • 02/111/80 ' - .225.000,00• __ _ FIRST NATO St PAUL •�•--- .FR•IF',CIPLE• PYMT; - - _ - • - 4/1=4610 - 9119t -- " -------- * --- --- _ .._ -.- _.. - .,_ __ -.. • , :,r 045170 02/14/80 47,520.00 FIRST NAT. ST.'PAUL INTEREST PYMT. 44- 4611 - 911 -91 '.1).-._ 045170 02/14/80 • • 153.18 FIRST NAT; ST. PAUL PAYING AGENT . 44 - 9 -91 - -.__:_.. _.__. . - -- .- - _ 272,673.1.8 * • I 1• 045172 02/14/80 165.83 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL GENERAL SUPPLIES 71- 4220 - 911 -91 5058 1 - :. - - •165.93 * 1'1 0 02/14/8n 46.55 EARL FLECK _._ TRAVEL EXPE`'SE 01- 4330 - 211 -21 1 045173 02/14/80 1 EARL FLECK MEETING EXPENSE 01 -4396- 211 -21 1 60.70 *. H . 04517 02/14/80 - 87.78 JOHN FLYNN _ •.- , TRAVEL EXPEt - 0t- 4330 - 311 -31 .. ..._ _ ___:____ . .1~ 04517 02/14/80 21.00. JOHN FLYNN MEETING EXPENSE u1 - 311 -31 • r: •045174 02/14/80 1.071.94 JOHN FLYNN . REFUNDS & REP+d. b1- 3950 - 311 -31 1 , 1.180.72 * i *. :- 045175 02/14/ 5.00 Tim I3ERENS DUES & SU8SCR. 01 -4391- 321 -32 t ..: 5,00 1., .i • • i 1980 CITY OF gHAKOPEE CHECK REGISTER _......_ .__ 0 PAGE _._... 4 ( -i CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM,DEBCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV. k P.O,' MESSAGE 045176 02/14/80 159.21 FRANZ ENGR.REPROO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 01 -4220- 411 -41 8605 ' i 15 9.21 * • * * * * ** * * * - CKS ... 1 + 045185 02/14/80 .. .... _ 4 V _ ._ •_. 4 232 - 311 3 =,_.. _ • �" 00•:..._ .._..._GUPHER_9TAT.E.:TRUCK._ _ :__ EHYCLE,MAIN ?. _Ql° • i 4.00 * • i' **** ** * ** -CKS !' 045188 o?/14/80 . 329.40 •GENEAL OFFICE PRO, OFFICE SUPPLIES A 01- 4 210 - 331 -33 649902 , • 829,40. A._:. __ _._ ' * ** -CKS I 0 02/14/80 .-_ — .__--- -13,F6 _ _ _ ._..__- • HARMON9ThDa i E. RICO K 7 GENERbL—SUPPLIES . 7-• -- --- b1- I12a0 =421- 42_..1.5916+._._...----- -- - - -. . ... .__.. (hi 045 ?04 02/14/80 5.27. HARMONS HOWE.' HANK .• SMALL TOOL PURCH, "01 - 441 -44 16310 - o';' . 04520 02/14/80 . .. . _.-.._- _-_1 __.,___- 1iARMQNS. .> H _ ; HDWEo_ANK._ - _ - ,BLDG.,_ MAINT.___-__.__ ..._-_ :____ 9.1 °423.1'4.81'16 15968 ' . i..i 38.85 * ( � ,, . 045205 02/1 81.1.9 - --- _.- - _ -- LEROY R _._ OUSER___ _:_._— -___9CHOUL9_ & - _CONF._ _ ____ 4390 - 331 33 ____...._ - ._ _ . - (,: .. --. __._ .- ._,.____ 81.19 it 4 ;t . -. : * * * * ** ' -- _ _ - -- — * ** - i ! , i 045209 02/14/80 24,96 HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP. EQUIP.MAINT. 01- 4230 - 421 -42 '•i 0 02/14/8.0 24 96- HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIP. BLDG. MAINT. 01- 4 230 - 421 -42 _.,— .__.. _._. _._._ _ ., r, o 02/14/80 24.96 HAYOEN- MURPHY E�UhP. - - BLDG. MAINE. -- — - - 01 42 - 421'42 ' 045209 02/14/80 500.00 HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP, CAPITAL- EQUIP. 01- 4511 - 421 -42 103896 _ . . 5 2 1 4 . 9 6 *. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. _ . _ _ _ _ i * * * * ** * ** - CKS H 045211 • 02/1 6.25 HENNENS SKELLY . VEHICLE MATNT. 01-14232-311-31 34 i'i 045211 02/14/80 12.50 NENNE_NS SKELLY VEHICLE MAINT, 01 - 421 -42 11 18.75. * _.._.__._.. __.._ - -_ -.. --- _._ —.__ .. ..__.--- ._....:_..__......._. -- _ -• ("I * * * * ** . , ***...CKS i " 045215 02/14/80 28,71 - - -- - HOUSE OF —PRINT -- __ -__ -- ._ 6 REPRO, - - ... --_ 01 ; -1 4681_ I- 045215 02/14/80 13.90 HOUSE OF PRINT PRTG, & REPRO. 01 - 331 -33 4564 . i 1 ( _ .I . i * ** -CKS i °i 045220 02/14/80 325.00 . .MARK H1'RD•AERIAL -- , .. - GENERAL SUPPLIES 01- 4 220 - 411 - 41 _ - i ' , 325.00 * i•. n * ** -CKS _� , +i' 045 ?34 02/14/80 50.00 ICMA _ DUES R SURSCR. 01- 4391- 121 -12 012041 j .'( 50.00 * ,i` 045235 02/14/80 100.00 IDs LIFE INS..... RFNIT +I+.)S 81- 497.7 -911 -9 1,_ I - _ i • • 1980 CITY OF SHAKOPEE CHECK REGISTER 02 14 au t',GE 5 I . '': CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT ` VENDOR. - ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCn NO. 14V, V P.O. li MESSAGE 100.00 * 045238 02/14/80 76. INSTANT TESTING ',� ENGR,SERVICES 01 411-41 1 • 045238 • 02/14/80 , ____ 254,00 _..`._ _.INSTANT.TEBTYIJG : e_ ....__._:,.:.ENGR. SERVICES._ _.___...___.__._ ®U __ - .__._- . --_ -- , 330.00 0 I ' i a ** * ** - - - ** * °CKS - I 045243 02/14/80 • 1,259.31 INTERSTATE DIESEL CAPITAL-EQUIP . 1 421 42 01 451 f !•, * * * *** - - * ** -CKS 1 0452S6 02/14%80 _ . -- 'GEORGE JOHNSON JR. - TlAVEL EXPEFeE___' 61m4130;1711m14-_._- _..___... _ -- ---- --- - ......_._.._ i '-1 045267 02/14/80 - 36,50 KOEHNENS STANDARD VEHICLE MAINT. 01 =4232- 311 -3i i 36.50 a , :; , ., * * * * ** * ** -CKS -i H 0 . 02/14/80 664,00 KRASS 6 MANAHAN LEGAL SERVICES 01- 4310 - 161 -16 0 ' 02/14/80 • 659.00 KRASS 1 MANAHAN LEGAL SERVICES 01 4310 - 162 - 16 .1. 1 045270 02/14190... - $35.04 - KR4S9 .. �PANANAf3 - - - — LEGAL' SERVICES - __- OIeG10 -163 1 i 045270 02/14/80 248.00 KRASS It MANAHAN LEGAL SERVICES • 23 -4310- 911 -91 1, 045270 • 02/14/80 _ _ ..... __222.75...________ ___KRASS__ MANAHAN LEGAL SERVICES _ 24 -4310- 911 -91 '. ;''1 045270 02/14/80 .0 33 KR4 1 MANAHAN - - _.... - - _ _ __._ - -_•-- •• _ -- g LEGAL -' 53 -4310- 911 -91 - 2,861.75 * ** * ** i �' : 0115290 02/14/00 . ..... - 9.00 ... _... LEAGUE OF ►+r1.CITIE9 , DUES R SURSCR. 01- 4391 - 331 -33 ' * * * * ** * ** - CKS , 01152 02/14/80 • 723.92 LOGI9 EDP EGUIP.NNTL. 01- 11 384 - 151 -15 . . -_.. __ 723.92 * ,.... .. 1 H. i 045301 02/14/80 .340.00 LOCAL UNION 4320 -' `- - .., IT'%UNION DUES 81= 4924 - 911 -91 • 340.00 * • I 045302 02/14/8n 6.20 LANDEYS ERUII'.MAIMT. ' 01- 1 1230 - 421.4? 11 �•' •' t _ 6.20 * . . . - ..__. • �l• * * * * ** • , A ** -CKS • `' _ 0453:18 0 ?/111/80 • 46.88 1- 4 ALKERSON MOTORS VF.HJCLE h,AI' T. 01 -14232- 311 -31 58866 _ , . . '---'' . . ( - '' ' � ''---'---� - ,�' ' '` I'. . 19e0 CITY OF h*^xnpsc p2 14 8 _PAGE 'u • �/ . - (. i '� -- . CHECK *�. DATE VENDOR ' ITEM uESCx/,//u° ACCOUNT "" ^". , . . 4 ,^.."~^ .! ' � � ! o«ss�n oa/�«�oo ma o uw�wcxuon nu/uxu np��/°�,, n~�� "^ --=~"-"^^-�^ '.'~ ( ' 4�� nn ^` vus9�v o��*roo � � 01-391-121--a- x�x �� ' (� - (. , ' ` ' j_ . |"| °^^°*^ "*°~^~" , / "i . • 045322 02/14v80 � �� _� a�^55 �c�oLL��ynP» 1°+�T~_____'__"l�2*=�s�i�z�_79�__ '_-___' ' ( ..! . � � ' ) .! ^***^^ � �_ _�'____��_.��` _=__�__`�_ ' ��_�___��___,__�. `� ' ___�__��____ [ � 10 a � ' | '| uug3za oa/,u�no • 37,2o MIDWEST HVC EouIP.w«IwT" 01,4230-4 as 3 eV_�- ■ -� --�--,'--'--�� ' � - ' '-�' ' '------ • - � � ' ' ii.�� \ , � ' ' ' ' *^*~ c�� '" ] �**°*^ ' ' `� ' ' ` ^ ! � ` � ' � '� ! �J ' '�� ' ' � '' � ` �� ^ '^` � �- `' ` ' ` �'� /��'' � ' �o 3n oa��oo -- - --'--'�-------'- ---� ' � ��'--------'-------- - � | � | / ' -`` - - ~ ] ! 26.08 * ' ' ''---- ------� �� """ ^^n / ^^^^+° ' � �( ~� , ^ '' � � . • 0 02/14/80 - - ......_ ___ ..67t3.7_0-. _______ NzpmcoAwCw v4. __0^ ^~e^3 «5337 • 02/14/80 53.44 " z��o�oo ns oo nznw�*^o�u mp/� °°" "^-`°'^-..^-~ :/ » «S337 2v14mo 18925 wIww[suocO 0 ot~us71~asq~ha � � !'| ____ ____p��"��____----_ • -.- _-' --�----� ---'---'---- - / � • `' o45338 02/14/80 67.71 MINNESOTA 7wACron ^' ` EnD1p.MuIw7" 01~4230~421~4e 46338 / '. __- �77��.� --' , '_ i ' 'i °*°*^° .".-^°3 | ^. -- �u��o�� o��u/*� ' � - -' - -�� - �� - - m4iNf---,� - ----- ht~42 t7 �2s ' '' 0«5346 02/14/8n 20~71. • MOTOR PARTS ` . ' ' VEHICLE MAINT. 01~4232~421~42 . � ��^�l ^ __ - -�-'---- '---- ------ — -� ' '---�-'--- -- —��----^----- /. ' ' ^^"~r^» � . • ^*^^** i vvs�/p �pv�uvoo ' -- ��;60' - ` * ' --- ��LS�SfAR& TRIBUNE ----- TO" & REPRo� 01-4351L151-15-16821-- �- --- -- -- -- 1-- . / 29,60 * ! � [ . � . ' - _- --- -'- -' . -' --- . - --_ ------ _- . ____ - _ ' .- ' - ' ---- _____ _____-_-- --_- '- --- '! °+^^^° ' |] . 045352 02/14/80 v _ 5F ~ oo � • *rn^_____________. � ncnno�u�o cOwr. _ � _ 01~^39o~1s1_x5 --____-+�- ' |c . 55,vV� |' ' ' o45553 02/14/80 . 642,72 _ *^non~nyxow� _, _'__ _ cLoTMlwo ox~4�z�_�a��so _ � _ !� ��Z,�Z � ' � ' +� |! �^***^ . � � ' � �- ' � � `_ __ _ _� . __ � __ __ ` /i !` ' ~''/ 0o53e7 02/1 26,20 o^ SELL TELFppouE ox~«s21~t11~1\ /� ) i`/ 005387 n2/10/6n 196,80 . *n opL � .. � � TpLsppnwE 01- .. _ ___ _ ______--_'u • i I, 1480 CITY OF 9HAKOPF.E CHECK REGISTER 02 14 80 PAGE 7 _ 1:I CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT • - VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPT19M ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.0 0 MESSAGE - 4 ; 045387 02/14/80 53.90 LL • • TELEPHONE 01 =43321- 141 -14 ''i 045387 02/14/80 85.18 NW BELL TELEPHONE 01- 4321 - 151 -15 ' 045387 02/14/80 92.34 NW BELL TELEPHONE 01-4321-182-18 1•;1 045387 02/14/80 .... - 347.81 _ ii BLL E . -- TELEPHONE - --- -.. »� - :'•' 045387 02/14/80 38.67 Nw BELL '' TELEPHONE 01- 4 321 - 321-32 ' i ° i • 045387 • 02/14/80 _ -- -.• -2 . --- - --- - - NW . BELL = - -- :._._,:.:___TELEPHONE ••, __.-.._._.� ___ _ -4321 ®331 -33 i.. _ "i 045387 02/14/80 ON 111.58 NW BELL - TELEPHE , 01-4321-'41141 - 1 0 02/14/80 55.99 NW BELL .TELEPHONE 01 -4321- 421 -42 I, I. 045387 02/14/80 26.20 NW BELL - TELEPHONE 1S 4321 - 191 -19 j _..- .._.___ _.� - -. -. -•- I ,.., -.._ - - - 1 k . ! asp *a* _._.._ : **oCK_. I. I 045428 02/14/80 425.00 • PATCHIN APPRAISALS OTHER PROF.SERVICES 13 -4315- 911 -91 79321 • 425.00 - - - - - - - ___�.�_._ -._. _ .. *** 1 0454 02/14/80 12.00 PEARSON FLORISTSS C : MISC.EXPENSE 01 -4499- 111 -11 26025 12.00 * . Pi I i , 1 i _ 045457 . 02/14/80 ____ .__._._: 9.47__ _ _.___.-__RADI-Q_ SHACK___._ OFFICE SUPPLIES__ ;____ -� 01- 4210 - 121 -1- 2_073451 - ___-•.. __ _.__-_.._-. •___ il , ,i 9.47 * 1 , , * * * -CK9 I I 045461 02/14/80 45.80 REYNOLDS WELDING • GENERAL SUPPLIES 01- 4220 - 421 -42 47949 I I 02/14/80 _ - 35.00 _REYNOLDS WELDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 01- 4220 - 441 -44 ': - 80.80 * ._._._.____......._ 1I 1'.I 0 45462 02/14/80 15.60 RICH LYNN CORP. GENERAL SUPPLIES 01- 4220 - 121 -12 78508 1 15. 0 • to I *• * * ** . 045468 02/14/80 10.30 ROBERTS OPUG GENERAL SUPPLIES 01- 4220 - 121 -12 2169 i , 10.30 * - - • * * * * ** ' 045475 02/14/80 13.50 RAY RUUSKA TRAVEL EXPENSE 01 -4330- 411 -41 ! I LJ 13.50 * • ''! '045476 02/14/8n 33.00 ROB -GLD INC, - •EQUYP i4A1A'T. of -Lin0. 621-62 1543• 1,1 33,00 * - - - • ,_,j '111 045499 02/14/80 • 7.05 SCOTT CTY. TREASURER GENERAL SUPPLIES 01- 4220 - 151 -15 - pi 7.05 * i .! * * *.C',,5 1. • 1 1.980 CITY OF.SHAKOPEE : _CHECK_REGISTE . R_ . _ ... ._..... 02 14 80_ PAGE H •.1 CHECK NO. DATE AmoUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. r P.U. R MESSAr.E ,_, 1 0 0'2/14/80 219. SHAKOPEE FORD VEHICLE SAINT. 01 - 421 -42 t : ( ; - .219.45 * y' • 1 _ l e 1 1 045503 02/14/80 11.02 . SHAKOPEE HDWE, .GENERAL•SUPPLIES 01 -4220- 421 -42 (1 1 •005503 02/14/80 17.74 SHAKOPEE•HOWE. ' GENERAL SUPPLIES 01 -4220- 441 -44 . 1Oi` • 1 ": _ 0 . 02/14/80 ' _ ... .___..__24.69. __:_.__-__.SHAKOPEE . _._�._.9HAKOPEE ._ _.. 01- 4220 - 621 -62_. �__ -.• -_; •, ' 1:1 . . HDWE:-__ ,__.:�....�.GENERaL=.9UPPLIES _._..._ _ _ ._ ..... _.__ : .: .._____ ,._,+ °; • 1,1 045503 . 02/14/80 . 18.70 SHAKOPEE HDwE. GENERAL SUPPLIES . 01- 4 220 - 622 -62 ! .' 0 • 02/14/80 6,79 SHAKOPEE HUN•E, VEHICLE MAINT, 01 -4231- 311 -31 I' .. 79.54 .... 1" � - - - - - .I •i.1 0115505 02/14/80 24,23 SHAKOPEE LUMBER ' , - GENERAL SUPPLIES 01- 4220 - 42142 I ,• 045505 • 02/14/80 21,28 SHAKOPEE LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES' 01- 4220- 441 -44 ! . ;", 045505 02/1 2.61 _ _ _ SHAKOPEE LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES • 01.4220-621-62 1- 1 1' 045505 02/14/80 . , 83.70 SHAKOPEE LUM BLDG; MAINT. -- •• - O1 °231 - 62 __. . _.. _ _.. - - -.. . ... - ___ ___ _. ; ( : 131,82 * , r - 22 ; 045508 02/14/80 623,38__ __ SHAKOPEE-_ VALLEY_ PUB _ „_. __ 01 ®4350 - 121 -12 �, i i 0115508 02/111/80 • 6.72 SHAKOPEE VALLEY PUB. PRIG. R REPRO. ___ - _ . o1 -4351- 151 - �- _,! ( • -' 045508 02/14/80 • 6,72 SHAKOPEE VALLEY'PUB. PRIG. & REPRO. 01-4351- 181 -18 �.,, •-: ...0 02/14/80 ... .. _ ....__ 4 1. 33-________ SHAKOPEEa_. Y. 4L.. EY.. eUB; .•:�.'- _LEGAt._ 13 °4350 - 911-91 :._._ ' - . _._ ..._,.. :. . l 045508 . 02/14/80 ' 7.82 SHAKOPEE VALLEY PUB. LEGAL NOTICES + 22 - 911 -91 •` i 0 02/14/90 61.87 SHAKOPEE VALLEY PUB. LEGAL NOTICES 23 -4350- 911 -91 I I ! - ". 045508 02/14/80 54.12 . __ • __ - _,____ SHAKOPEE VALLEY PUB. LEGAL NOTICES 24 -4350- 911 -91 ! •.•i 1''i 005500 02/14/80 . 52.67 , SHAKOPEE VALLEY PUB: LEGAL NOTICES 55 0350 - 91 i - i -'- - •- ��• - -�- ••�- - -` •- -- -`� • } 850,63 * • ! -`i r 1 045512 02/14/80 • -_ 5.00, _:TOP _9IEBENALER _ DUES 8_ 9URSCR. _ _ bt -4391- 321 -32 .-J 5.00 * i i ' 1 " 0 02/14/80 60.06 SPUC ERUIP.MAINT. 01- 4230 - 639 -62 J 045517 02/14/80 207.80 _.._ •_,_ SPUC __ _ __,. BLDG. MAINT. 01- 4 231-_4 4 1 -4 ! ('' 045517 02/14/80 310.50 SPUC . POSTAGE 01- 4320 - 1 -14 • ' 045517 02/14/80 315.89 SPUC 'ELECTRICITY 01 -4370- 181 -19 ' .: • ` 0 02/14/80 252.80 + . .. ... SP 1C__ ..._._...:_ _.____.._.,...___.ELECTPICITY .. .. _...... ....01 -4370- 182 -18. __ 0 02/14/80 . 181,66 SPUC ELECTRICITY 01 -4370- 311 -31 1 „I °i 04 02/14/80 127.21 SPUC ELECTRICITY 01- 4370 - 321 -32 1 045517 02/14/80 1 SPUC ELECTRICITY 01- 4370-351 -35 _ •__._ ° . ' 1 04 02/14/90 363.34 SPUC - ELECTRICITY 01 -4370- 421 -42 - -.'. - __. f '1 045517 02/14/80 246,81 • SPUC ELECTRICITY • 01- 4370- 427 -42 `' , I•" . 0 4 5517 ')2/14/80 ' 111.56 . SPUC _. ._ ._ • ELECTRICITY 01. -0370- 622 -62 � j• •' 045517 02/14/80 23.20 SPUC ELECTRICITY 01 -4370- 625 -b2 'l• 045517 02/14/80 160.92 SPUC ELECTRICITY 01-4370 - 62 - 62 ,- 045517 02/14/60 • 115.60 _SPUC . ELECTPIC1TY 01- 4370 - 639 -62 I + ; 2.496.85, * 1 -, 7 005518 02/14/80 3.053.25 ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL._.. OTHER PFOF.SERVICE9 01 - 911 -Y1 ( 1 ' " .. ^. � ! . ' k. 1980 CITY OF SHAKOPEE . CHECK REGISTER . 02 14 80 PAGE 9 / CHECK *n, DATE • . | ' 645518 ba/�o;u - / ' o«s5�» - o �/1�/u � . • � ~..,~.^� ' |'/ `^ ~ ( .~ ^°^^*^ ~ � / . °"._^"~ . ' , ` . � [[� 0 � 02/14^80 ' w ��----- 01-0231-181-18 ----'--'--'------ • ^ o4s92o 02/14/80 17.00 ~'-^^^ CLEANING • "`°~ ^°^~' . 01-4231-182-1" li i • • |' / 045520 02v14/8 |'| 005520 • oa/m/a - � - -~ [ �� - ^ � ~^--^~^- ~^ | t' 'J - ^ ^'- -~^-- - ` ' ~ -- ~-'' .. . � ' " `, . ' ( `� - � ^^^^+ 1. '- - -. ~ ^- - --- ' ``! • 1- : 045522 oa/m/u0 w |' ' � ' 20,Z* *` . ----------- ` ' « • / , � � ' ` ' ' ' .` : . ��^^^*^^ ..- � ' '• ' '� ' � '' ' ' *«°~c^n ' � |' ��------------- � ! 045525 02/14/80 18,487.00 SUBURBAN ENG. ENGR.SERVICES 56-4312-911-91 ' ' . " . . , � i • • � _ ' -�»�9�? ��_-__--_.--_ - - - � _ �______�' - � ' ' � • • � . � ��- _- ,� ', . . .' ` , ] ouss�o 02/14/80 /� 005526 o2/tu/�o 67.75 �U�� BUSINESS �oU�p ; ^ OFFICE SUPPLIES ' • 01~4210~121~12 ` �' EQUIP. -: |' 005526 02y14/80 52 �5 SUEL ouulwEbo��o�� ---- ' U �P��E - �U�p�l�� ------- '��«��~l9'�' ----------------- ''' " " �] ' ' ` ' os 5a oa��*�no | « � '= ^" v""` �"�^~"�o�"�"^' OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-171-17 ^ ' �«5sa6 02/14/80 --^- EL BUSINE EQUIP. '^~^ SUPPLIES 01-4210-311-31 ` j o*ssz6 oa/Iu�Vv -- - ' - '� - a�5� - _ --- �'8b�L - �U8I�E8 F10EDUPPL[�' �77u� i��-331�33----------' -' -----7' '-(j � | 4. '] oossz+ 02/14/80 16.25 - , oucL BUSINESS EQUIP: ` OFFICE SUPPLIES ' 01~4210~421~42 � ' ` • ' o«ss�� v��^�oo �5.0� � pucL BUSINESS [ .. w 0.4230.-141-14 oyIp�%m?0.4230.-141-14 � �u�~�4 |'� U o/ o�5s�� 1o/po • - � . - .'' --^ ~ ---^. ~ ~' . ^~ . ^^^. .^ --.^ ^ . / . o455ea 02/14/80 43.47 oosL BUSINESS [nuIp" • orrlcs SUPPLIES |.! ' .' _�+V -- --- -__-� __ ' !, � • ' � ' LI � .' ^*^^^^ . • . ' H ~"~ | i `i� o�s5s1 02/i 4/80 � -- -'��66-' ' — '§kAx�0��y[---'----- • --(50.-AA2v?: '' - � 5.00 * ' -- | �. . . � � �. -- __ - . _--__- -- -_�_-__--_' _ -'-. � -�-' -_--�' ' 9 ' � � . - '--------,--''--' -''---� K �— ' 005534 02/14/80 �1A,00 SCHILZ ORNAMENTAL_ _�_''_��"n, �*`"T. o1~u2��o�~1a ^�3s |` 1 ° ' � � ' ' � � '- ' - - --' �- ----- i ' ` • Li *^^^^^ . 045536 02/14,80 • 7"782,20 c/7Y OF SHAKOPEE LT DEPOSITS ' 54~2340~911~91 '/ 7,782.20 * . '_ � . � . _ _ __. _ |. • ' I- . *^^~ck» ',."1 • 005'5S0- oz/iii/tin 2s �7 JIM 7xck rr�v[L �VPcu6� ot~ ^33o~��x�� ' - ' ' ' --- - - | /� . • " � 25.27 * • [�" � . |�/ ****** . • � . • -�' -__��x�� __-�� • ' LI...! • . . • I Ir.: . . . • . . • . 1980 CITY OF SHAKOPEE . CHECK REGISTER . 02 14 8u PAGE 10 - - . ;•;< %. I ■ CHECK NO O. DATE AMOUNT.. • ' i : ' VENDOR ' -• :,••• :'•`, :!., ' - ITEM DESCRIPTION .. ACCOUNT No. INV. '-a P.O. # HESSAGE . .. _ . 1 :I . . ' . •• ___________ • • . ... 045c76 ' 02/14/80 30.00 U OF M 'SCHOOLS I CONF. 01b.4390-411011 117610 (*I 0 02/t4/60 27.50 U.OF M , ' • ' . SCHOOLS & CONF 01-43904.121-12 117610 . . IT 045576 02/14/80 18.00__p OFM"SCHOPIS & CONF. : 1._.01.!..°119- .1.1 _____,..._.........____ ri 045576 02/14/80 . • ! 90:00 - _ , U OF M • • ; • ...,,. r4,- ' & CONE: ' . - : 01.. . •. _ ..- :-: , • . , 1:•••4 . **CKS F-1 .. . . . , (." i': • . - . ti 045600 . 02/14/80 8.55 GREGG VOYEAND * MEETING EXPENSE 01-4396-151-15 • • Ir,1 • .t . * - • * '. ' • 1-. • ,- .„ . ., , . • •.,..) " 045601 . 02/14/80 . . . ........ ,.. 1 :281,70:„... 1...,....9ANLICE=ALLEN ... :::' - EN • .1,1 1,281.70 a . . • , L'd ! . i Am** _ : ! , . . 045619 02/14/60 11:00 . wEST PUBLISHING.2;.800KS .• f" • 01 ../ ' -- - - - . 1 i .00 0 . , . • ', $ - . - - . ... ' . ,%:, . . . , . , • , -; I I ( :1 0a56.2.0 02/14/80• 81.60 ViILCOX PAPER CO. OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-121-12 107463 1:4 81.60 * -, . ,. : .,., • f . **a-cKS 1 1 . . . . . . • - rf r • ****** • , .. • .. :: • • • . 1* i i • 045624 02/14/80 85.26 wAHC& WAHL • i0OiP.MAINT. 01- ;; ( I .1 • 1'1 23,732.29 FUND 01 TOTAL • ' • 1 ■- ; _ 99.12 FUND 15 TOTAL % 1 ! 218.82 FUND •22 TOTAL r! •a,r; 563.87 FUND 23 TOTAL . , - VA i • 276.87 FUND 24 TOTAL • - . 1 , •-,... t i 272,673.18 FUND 44 TOTAL •-.-„, • . • •1 1 ...,, . .-.. , . • : : e., • • i*. 33.00 FUND 53 TOTAL 1 . ;•••1 112,120.86 FUND 54 TOTAL . :•I _ , 52.67 FUND 55 TOTAL . . [77 16, FUND 56 TOTAL • . . • 165. . FUND 71 TOTAL • . ;.-1 c.i • . f. 5,954.55 • . . . _FUND.81. TOTAL_ ' . . . . . ; 0 , 482.926.39 TOTAL 1 i 1 -- - • . , . . i ' • ; 1 i •; i..-:.! !. I 1 ,. 4: • . - • . . . - - • . . i .. . ....! . . , . . .. . . . . . .. . DEBIT -A COUNT CREDIT. ACCOUNT. AMOUNT _BATCH -: REMARKS - VENDOR- CHECK AMOUNT CHECK 01.4394.331.33 01.1010 • - 115.00 - Books Cole Publications 115.00 01.4244.432.42 1,100.63 - Ice Control Mat. Comm. of Transp./State of MN 1,100.63 . 01.4391.321.32 " - ' 25.00 - Subscriptions Fire Engineering 25.00 - 01.4391.321.32 , " _ _ 15.00' - - "- • Fire Chief Magazine 15.00 . 01.4315.432.42 375.00 , - Prof. Services.. Great Lakes Weather. Service - 375.00 • 01.4391.121.12 ' '• " _ - 25.00 Dues Intl. Inst. of Mun. Clerks 25.00 01.4410.181.18 " - 28.42 Jan. Services Marie Lebens 28.42 01.4410.181.18 " ` . -- , 73.08 it Rose Mertz 73.08 01.4391.311.31 " 15.00'_ Dues Thomas A. Morgan 15.00 01.4391.111.11 " 10.00 it Minn. Mayors' Assn. 10.00 01.4391.421.42 " 12.00 II Mn. St. Super. Assn. 12.00 01.4410.181.18 " 24.36 Jan. Services Clarice Neubert 24.36 23.4330.911.91 23.1010 582.00 Travel Expense Northwest Orient 582.00 • 01.4391.121.12 01.1010 8.00; Subscriptions Prior Lake American • 8.00 01.4373.711.71 It 7,157.60 Garbage pick -up Woodlake Sanitation 7,216.07 01.4373.181.18 II 9.08 " 01.4373.182.18 II 1.51 it - 01.4373.311.31 II 13.44 " 01.4373.321.32 it 7.56 " 01.4373.421.42 " 13.44 " 01.4373.622.62 " 13.44 • DEBIT ACCOUNT CREDIT AMOUNT-. BATCH REMARKS VENDOR CHECK AMOUNT NO 23.4509.911.91 23.1 17,848.84 Other Imp. Valley Ind. Park, Ltd.. 17,848.84 • 4661 22.4508.911.91 22.1010 43,000.00 • Capital - Land Al Rybak 43,000.00 :'4662 01.4390.111.11 01.1010 60.00 Conference League of Minn. Cities 60.00 4663 15.4394.191.19 15.1010 1.60 Pamphlets Nab Trust for His.Preservation 1.60 4664 81.4931.911.91 81.1010 420.00 Savings ded. 1st Nat. Shakopee 420.00 4665 81.4923.911.91 " 4,697.55 PERA ded. PERA 4,697.55 4666 DEBIT ACCOUNT CREDIT 'ACCOUNT • AMOUNT .BATCH REMARKS VENDOR - CHECK AMOUNT CHECK NO. February, 1980 22,4981.911.91 22.1010 - 2,299.08 • Taxes - Scott Cty. Treas.' - 2,299.08 :4640. - 81.4931.911.91 -- 81.1010 - - - 420.00 - Savings Ded. - First Nat. Shakopee 420.00 - 4641 81.4923.911.91 " 4,698.20 PERA Ded. PERA - 4,698.20 - 4642 01.4223.311.31 01:1010 - 278.17 Uniform Allowance Dennis Anderson 278.17 4643 01.4223.311.31 278.17 " - Ronald Carlson 278.17 - 4644 01.4223.311.31 '-' -. 278.17 " Teherence Doyle 278.17 4645 01.4223.311.31 " - • 278.17 It John Flynn 278.17 - 4646 01.4223.311.31 278.17 Russell Lawrence 278.17 4647 01.4223.311.31 "- 278.17 it Gary Nosbusch 278.17 4648 01.4223.311.31 " 278.17 It Gerald Poole 278.17 4649 01.4223.311.31 " 278.17 Ronald Scherer 278.17 4650 01.4223.311.31 " 139.09 " Donald Bisek 139.09 4651 01.4223.311.31 139.09 it Earl Fleck 139.09 4652 01.4330.121.12 m 200.00 Travel Expense Douglas Reeder 200.00 4653 23.4 23.1010 177848:8 - 4 Other. InpL. SeuLLland rc. 1-7 -4-8-7-84 4654 ;/e' /, 22.4508.911.91 22.1010 2,294.15 Cap -Land Acq. Hill- Globel Moving 2,294.15 4655 22.4508.911.91 46.15 Leroy & Sharon Heitz 46.15 4656 22.4312.911.91 368.00 Eng. Services • SuburbanEngineering 368.00 4657 22.4315.911.91 1,170.45 Prof. Services Von Klug & Assoc. 1,395.45 4658 22.4508.911.91 225.00 Cap -Land 22.4315.911.91 1,480.00 Prof. Services Dorsey,Windhorst,Hannaford 1,480.00 4659 01.4390.151.15 01.1010 84.24 Conference Radisson Arrowwood .. 84.24 ' 4660 • - DEBIT ACCOUNT CREDIT• ACCOUNT • : _. AMOUNT -- -BATCH REMARKS - VENDOR - - • - - CHECK AMOUNT CHECK NO. fr .. . q'19 11 ii 6i0 - - 144:07 • 45�s3 - ' 1 81.4931.911.91 814010 - 420 ;00 Payroll savings - 1st. Nat. .Shakopee " - 420.00 4544 81.4923.911.91 "- - - - 4,290.51 PERA With PERA 4,290.51 -. - 4545 - 24.4509.911.91 24.1010 - 210,000.00 - Other Imp. MN State Hsg Finange Agency 210,000-.00 -" 4546 24.4980.911.91 2,170.00 Refund 200 Levee Drive Assn. 2,170.00 4547 01.4390.111.11 01.1010 • -: - - 135.00 Conference League of Cities 135.00 4548 -.74,-.4411-7-9117-914 / 4 ft b d/5 71 1010' 60 -0- 2078 - 1M- .- I onst-allmeats -- Me- t- re-- W-as -t-e- Control -6--1--,136 4 71.44 2- 97- 1.-91 1 —" - -1;346,40 . Res -y 01.4390.311.31 01.1010 600.00 School Bloomington Police Dept. 600.00 4550 • 01.4394.111.11 n - 6.25 Pamphlets Office of State Registrar 6.25 4551 01.4320.121.12 01.1010 400.00 Postage U.S. Postmaster 400.00 4606 81.4931.911.91 81.1010 420.00 Savings Ded. 1st Nat. Shakopee 420.00 4601 81.4923.911.91 n 4,639.08 PERA ded. PERA 4,639.08 4602 81.4920.911.91 " - - 10,058.85 Fed. With. 1st Nat. Shakopee 10,058.85 4603 81.4921.911.91 " 4,314.58 State With. Comm. of Revenue. 4,314.58 4604 54.4610.911.91 54.1010 120,000.00 Principal 1st Nat. St. Paul 146,094.00 4605 54.4611.911.91 n 26,010.00 Interest 54.4612.911.91 " 84.00 Paying Agent 01.4370.351.35 01.1010 47.73 Elec. Stmt. , Minn. Valley Electric 78.04 4607 01.4371.427.42 30.31 " 01.4321.351.35 n 15.80 Phone Bill NW Bell 47.40 4608 01.4321.121.12 " 15.80 " 01.4321.421.42 n 15.80 " . . . . DEBIT ACCOUNT CREDIT - : ACCOUNT - - AMOUNT - BATCH REMARKS VENDOR. .- - CHECK AMOUNT - CHECK NO. it ' 01. 01.1010 . -- 6.74 '. - -- - Office Supplies Ames Office Supply' 6.74 4610 • 01.4371.321.32 " -- - -. -- • • • - - - 597:08• - Gas Stmt Minnegasco 597.08 4609 • 01.4371.182.18 "- •. - - . : . . - • - • 80.66 .- . - 01.4371.622.62 " - 152.65 . ". - • 01.4371.639.62 - - - 149.36:- _ - " 01.4371.181.18 " - - 255.72 - " - 01.4371.311.31 t1 385.91 11. .. - 01.4371.421.42 - -- 771.83 '.' 01.4390.331.33 "- 412.00• - School - LeRoy Houser 412.00 4611 01.4351.411.41 " 5.00.. • Printing Harry S. Johnson Co. 5.00 - .4612 01.4230.621.62 " 522.80 Equip. Maint. S & R Sales 522.80 4613 81.4924.911.91 81.1010 340.00 • Union Dues Local Union 320 340.00 4614 81.4927.911.91 " - 100.00 Def. Comp. Remit. IDS Life Ins. 100.00 4615 81.4926.911.91 " 139.21 • MBA Ded. /Cancer Prem. Minn. Benefit Assoc. 139.21 4616 81.4926.911.91 II 7.50 Cancer Prem. Lone Star Life 7.50 4617 01.4330.311.31 01.1010 150.00 Car allowance Tom Brownell 150.00 4618 01.4310.161.16 " 1,469.16 Legal Services Julius A. Coller II 1,469.16 4619 11.4315.811.81 11.1010 40.00 Prof. Services Mn. Comm. Ed. Assn. 40.00 4620 11.4315.811.81 " 17.00 " Al Lebens 17.00 4621 11.4315.811.81 " 20.00 " Comm. of Ed. 20.00 4622 11.4391.811.81 It 10.00 Membership MAPRA 10.00 4623 11.4385.811.81 10.00 Film rental Henn. Cty. Pk Res. Dis. 10.00 4624 11.4315.811.81 17.00 Prof. SErvices Roger Knudsen 17.00 4625 11.4980.811.81 6.00 Refund David Loftness 6.00 4626 11.4371.811.81 . - 48.35 Gas Stmt. - Minnegasco . . 48.35 4627 RESOLUTION NO. 1568 A RESOLUTION RECEIVING A REPORT HOLMES STREET (80 -3) WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted on December 19, 1978, a report has been prepared by H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer and dated May 14, 1979 with reference to the improvement of Holmes Street between First Avenue and Tenth Avenue by watermain, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, sidewalk, curb, gutter and bituminous surfacing, and construction of the Holmes Street storm sewer, and this report was received by Council on February 19, 1980. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the improvements of Holmes Street in accordance with the report and the assessments of abutting; and benefitting properties for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost the improvement of $1,776,540.00. 2. The work of this project is hereby designated as part of the 1980 -3 Public Improvement Program. Adopted in adj. regular session of the City Council Of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 19th day of February, 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of February, 1980. City Attorney MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder • City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland Finance Director RE: Appraisal of City Buildings DATE: February 11, 1980 There is budgeted for 1980, $10,000 for an appraisal of City buildings. Since budget time, I have reconsidered and • reduced the scope of work I consider necessary. I have received two quotations for a limited appraisal. One from General Adjust Bureau for $2,500.00, and one from Marshall Stevens for $3,500.00. Request Council to authorize retention of GAB for appraisal not to exceed $5,000:00. This will give me latitude as to the scope of the appraisal once GAB gets started and I have a chance to review in detail what work will be preformed. Action: Motion to retain General Adjustment Bureau for appraisal of City building for an amount not to exceed $5,000.00 GV /jiw [/ hft • • /I 13 MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator FROM: Gregg M. Voxland, Finance Director RE: Interfund Transfers DATE: February 13, 1980 A duplication has occurred on interfund transfers. Request Council void the transfer of $3,060.00 from Revenue Sharing to General "Fund and $2,165.00 from the Capital Equipment as originally contained in 'my memo dated 12/13/79. Action: Motion to void the transfers of funds as per the ' Finance Director's memo of February 13, 1980. GMV /ljw J/ l :v MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator RE: Staff Trip to Kmart Office in Detroit DATE: February 11, 1980 • On Thursday, February 7th, Tim Keane, Bo Spurrier and myself met with the following Kmart officials to discuss the realignment of the driveway entrance to the Kmart facility off of County Road 83: Charles Miller, Manager - Construction Department Harold Scarlet, Vice President - Construction Department Eva Fara, Architect of the Project Helen Lefler, Attorney - Real Estate Department Jim Held, Engineer - Construction Department I believe the meeting was very worthwhile and brought discussions on the problem we've had with the road alignment back into an understanding which will allow some kind of solution to be reached. While the Kmart officials did not absolutely agree to move the road at their cost, they have agreed to do the design work necessary for the relocation of the road and to determine the cost of that relocation. I assume that once this has been accomplished that we again have to discuss with them the costs involved in that relocation. We presented to them several alternatives for the relocation of that road and I believe, we generally agreed that the best alternative was to move the entrance to the Kmart Warehouse slightly to the north and to move the road in the proposed plat slightly to the south and therefore, allow them to line up the intersections. We also discussed with Kmart the cash -flow situation in the Tax Increment Project. As it now exists, there is no actual cash -flow problem, however, the cash -flow is still very tight and is important that the City keep tract of the expenditures made by Kmart and the contractor's constructing the water tank, the well and the road to insure that the schedule of payments on these contracts does in fact coincide with the proposed schedule which was used to make the various investments of the bond proceeds. We indicated to Kmart that it is important that the last $290,000 worth of contracts which the City will let for Kmart in completion of the $1,820,000 commitment,be made no sooner than July of 1980. We also indicated that as soon as possible, we need to reach an agreement on exactly what type of construction would be included Mayor and City Council -2- February 11, 1980 in this last phase of the City involvement with the project. They • were in general agreement that they saw no need for us to disburse cash before July, and I will be writing a letter to them to confirm our conversation on that matter. They fully recognize that it was in fact, the City who was going to let these contracts any- way and that, therefore, we were pretty much in control of the timing of these last contracts. The Kmart people were also concerned about the installation of the storm sewer for the Kmart project. As you will recall, this is the storm sewer project which we recently requested Barr Engineering to design for the City. Even with the use of an alternate consulting engineer to speed the project, we will not be able to have this project in place before the April rains come. Kmart feels that they may very well have a substantial part of the roof on the building before the April rains come and therefore, they are concerned that there is a need for some method of disbursing the storm water collected by the roof and put into the storm system which they have constructed on site. In order to answer this concern, we will probably have to recommend to you some time in early March that the City enter into a small contract to complete the temporary construction of storm sewer facilities to carry away the water from the Kmart site should there be a great deal of rain this spring. We think that these temporary measures can be done rather. quickly and inexpensively and will bring to you a proposal as;soon as possible. The cost of these temporary improvements will be charged against the storm sewer project which will be a Chapter 429'Special Assessment Project against the benefiting properties in that area. Finally, we discussed with the Kmart officials the advance for the next payment on the current construction project. They have agreed that they will by mid - February advance us another $600,000 to pay the contractor for the work done to date. It appears that the closing on the project where Kmart will be buying the property from the Housing Authority will occur sometime in early March. It is at that time, that we will have to repay Kmart for the approximately $1.5 million they have advanced to the Tax Increment Project for payment of the contracts now under construction. We will continue to draw interest on this money until that time. DSR /jiw cc: Rod Krass ,-4,_ va or / "f United States Department of the Interior IN REPLY REFER TO: � � FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE i- - I I- 1 Federal Building, Fort Snelling Twin Cities, Minnesota 55111 PL February 8, 1980 DIECEIV:: FEB 1 1 1980 Honorable Walter Harbeck, Mayor 129 East First Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Dear Mayor Harbeck: On behalf of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, we would like to extend our appreciation for the parti- cipation of your agency in the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge and Recreation Area status meeting, held January 16, 1980 in the Bloomington Coun- cil Chambers. The meeting was well attended and was extremely helpful in identifying many issues of concern regarding the Minnesota Valley project. The issues fell into three basic categories: 1. Interrelationship with local recreational activities, 2. Land acquisition funding, 3. Transportation crossings. A list of the issues that were raised is enclosed for your information. It ' will be our responsibility to address these issues in an appropriate manner during the planning phase of the project. Participation is a key to making the planning process work, and we appreciate your cooperation to date. The Minnesota Valley planning team will be arran- ging a series of meetings and workshops to gather public input to the plan. We will keep you advised of our schedule and progress as work proceeds. If there is any way we can be of further assistance to you, please let us know. () o Si c rely, AUA James Dustrude John C. Tietz Minnesota Valley Coordinator Chief, Office of Refuge Planning Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Enclosure Y W .Y v SUMMARY OF COMMENTS FROM PARTICIPANTS MINNESOTA VALLEY PROJECT, STATUS REPORT, JANUARY 16, 1980 Transportation - - Concern over the County Road 18 river crossing. - -There should be a mechanism to preserve (protect) transportation corridors throughout the valley. - -Land acquisition should be undertaken in a manner such that 4F and/ or 6F can be avoided or minimized. - - Concern for the 169 crossing (between Chaska and Shakopee). Local Recreation -- Concerned with the type of interface the plan will have with local and regional park systems and trails. - - Insure compatibility with all recreational planning efforts (local level). - -Will planning effort (Minnesota Valley) include the Recreation Area as well as the Refuge? - -How will management of the entire corridor be handled? Will it be left up to local units of government? - -Trail corridors (outside Minnesota Valley project area) should be considered and connected. - - Encourage coordination with all agencies so that there is no dupli- cation of activities. -- Insure the incorporation of the Minnesota Valley Trail in the plan. Funding for Acquisition - -The possibility of LAWCON "grants" should be explored to aid local communities. - -Not much help can be expected from the communities in acquisition of Recreation Area lands at the present time (priorities are with other projects). -- Concern for how aid and funding will occur. - -How many agencies, units of government, etc. should be land owners in the valley. What affect will multiple ownership have on management? Boundaries /Fencing - -How are Refuge boundaries determined? - -Will the Refuge be fenced (controlled access)? General Comments - - Interest in pushing for "public use" of the Refuge. - - Delight to see progress and believe this area to be an important con- tribution to the recreational activities of the area. S - 3 - - Consider damage to property (vandalism), litter, and damage to crops when trail use /planning is discussed. -- Conflicts will likely occur because of existing zoning and /or con- flicting land uses which exist adjacent to the Refuge units. Con- flicts may be resolved through close coordination. -- Consideration should be given to adjacent land (land use), i.e. bluff lands, in the study. - - Consideration should be given to the establishment of a nature inter- pretive center in Burnsville. - -The headquarters does not seem to be located in the center of the Refuge. Scott County is concerned that activities on the Refuge respond to their needs. • • • 4�j tN! of . °, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY e �; o 'IP. � B.__' /m MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION. CORPS OF ENGINEERS , P.O. BOX 103. DOWNTOWN STATION • ;� Y OMAHA. NEBRASKA 68101 / , • • NOTICE 31 January 1980 All persons interested in the National Hydroelectric Power Study being conducted by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers are invited to 11•, a public meeting co- sponsored by the Corps' North'Central Division and Missouri River Division on March 4, 1980, in Minneapolis, Minnesota. 7 Col. C. A. Selleck, Jr., the Corps' Missouriltiver Division Engineer, ====J will preside over the meeting, which is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. at the Radisson Hotel, 45 South Seventh Street. The event is expected to end by mid- afternoon. Information on the purposes and progress of the study will be presented. In addition to discussing nationwide aspects, representatives of the Missouri River and North Central Divisions will describe study efforts in their area to date and the work which lies ahead. Members of the public are invited to attend the meeting and to express their views on the role of hydroelectric power in the attainment of our Nation's future energy goals. In arriving at a firm estimate of time and space requirements for this meeting, persons intending to speak are urged to mail a card to the Missouri River Division Office, Corps of Engineers, P. O. Box 103, Down- town Station, Omaha, NE 68101. In addition, preparation of the meeting record will be facilitated if speakers furnish a written text of their remarks either before or during . 7:j the meeting. - -.1,, Y j s , t NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER STUDY REC-ENED IN= • PUBLIC MEETING, 4 MARCH 1980 r . FEB .11 80 1 1980 i RADISSON HOTEL, MINNEAPOLIS, MN CITY OF SHAKOPEE AGENDA i OPENING REMARKS COL, C. A. SELLECK 10:00 AM t STUDY EFFORTS (NATIONWIDE) MR. 'R.'J. McDONALD * : 10:30 °`` STUDY EFFORT (MARCA) MR. C. T. GARVEY , . 10:50 ., STUDY EFFORT. (MAIN) MR, JOSEPH RAOUL, JR. 10:50 fl PUBLIC COMMENT - 11:00 BREAK 12 :00 ' ig, ,E .: i PUBLIC COMMENT 1:30 PM SUMMARY COL. C.A. SELLECK . 2:30 * NATIONAL STUDY DIRECTOR • CORPS OF ENGINEERS INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES '' E FT. BELVOIR, VA. e i t f . El NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER STUDY PUBLIC MEETING, 4 MARCH 1980 RADISSON HOTEL, MINNEAPOLIS, MN . FACT SHEET • Why conduct a National Hydroelectric Power Study (NHS)? It was'directed by Congress in Section 167 of PL . 94-587, The Water Resources Development Act of 1976. • What are the study objectives? - • - . What Define US need for hydropower. Define physical limits to, increased hydropower.' Analyze existing policy regarding hydropower. ' — - ,;,,,.., Determine feasible increases in hydropower generation. Identify the environmental and social effects of more hydropower. Recommend hydropower programs and policies to Congress. m‘mni .....] . • Who is doing the study: . Common elements (policy, computer programs, contracts to define . need, etc) are being managed by the Institute for Water Resources (IWR) . Studies of specific damsites are being done by Corps;Dis'trict Offices. Divisions will readjust study boundaries along line "established for Reliability Councils. Ill • Missouri River Division (MRD) will publish a report on'the Mid - Continent Area Reliability Coordination Agreement (MARCA) area. North Central Division (NCD) will publish a report on the Mid- America Interpool Network (MAIN) area. • What are Reliability Councils? . 1 MARCA and MAIN are components of the National Electric Reliability Council (NERC) ilill , NERC is a voluntary association of utilities to augment reliability and adequacy of bulk power supplies. ® What has been done to date? Thousands of projects have been screened for economic feasibility. MARCA started the study with 15,000 projects; is now studying 100. MAIN started the study with 6,000 projects; is now studying 600. • What remains to be done? --"]-1 Screen remaining projects based on their environmental and social impacts. Make final economic evaluation. • ] % Prepare Regional Plans for each Reliability Council Area for various estimates of future loads and environmental constraints and write Regional Reports. Submit Regional Reports to IWR for use in preparing the National Report. ® What kind of input could I make to this study? Comments on trade -offs between: Hydropower and recreation. • Hydropower and irrigation. :: Hydropower and environmental impacts. Criteria of strict economic merit and help via grants or low interest loans. Anything else you consider pertinent to the study. 1, ® Will there be other public meetings? '' ::::j 1 Yes. When our analyses are nearly completed and the time to prepare Regional Plans is at hand (perhaps in August) another meeting will be held to discuss specific findings. ; ® How will public input be used? We must always' remember that there are many publics, and they view our studies from differing perspectives. If a community•or a responsible group discloses facts which make a hydro project objectionable it no doubt will be dropped from consideration. If a utility or dam owner points out economic costs not detailed in our broad survey which make the power plant too expensive, it will fall out. On the other hand, demonstrated need and enthusiastic support for an efficient project will give it high priority in the final ranking. Ili 7 • • • 1111- NOMINATIONS FOR C. C. LUDWIG AWARD � FOR DISTINGUISHED MUNICIPAL SERVICE IIII IIII Deadline March 15, 1980 league of minnesota cities TO: Mayors, Managers and Clerks in Member Cities For the 18th consecutive year, the Board of Directors of the League of Minnesota Cities is pleased to ask for your nomination for the C. C. Ludwig Award for Distinguished Municipal Service. The deadline for nominations is March 15. With the deadline only two months away, there may be instances where it poses a problem for nominating groups. If so, please let me or the League staff know as soon as possible. Our aim is to see that any candidate receives the fullest possible consideration. 1 , Those among you who knew the late Clarence Ludwig, League Executive Secretary from 1935 to 1958, know what fine attributes of public service were exemplified in his own life and ideals. Over the years, the stature of the award has grown so that nomination is recognized as a high honor. You can add to this stature by seeing to it that if you have a highly qualified per- son among your officials or employees, he or she is promptly nominated for this year's award. The award plaque will be presented at the Annual Conference to the official or employee of a member city who has,.in the opinion of the judges, the most outstanding record of public service for a city among those nominated for the award. The judges may, at their discre- tion, present two awards when nominees meet the standards of excellence contemplated for the award. When two awards are presented, however, one must go to an official of a city of less than 10,000 population. For this reason, small as well as large cities are urged to submit nominees. For your guidance in preparing your nomination, instructions and a copy of the rules are enclosed. One copy of the nomination form is enclosed and additional copies are available on request. You may be interested to know that the committee of judges is composed of Minnesotans who are themselves'distinguished in public service. In addition to the form, the judges rely heavily on Supplementary Documents as outlined on page two of the award form. Your attention'is also directed to the criteria enumerated under "Eligibility for Award" (see the first page of award rules). Material presented should help the judges make their decision based on these criteria. If you wish to present a variety of docu- ments in making your nomination, we recommend that it be enclosed in a notebook, binder or scrapbook. All information regarding nominees must be sent to the League office. If any material in support of your nominee will be submitted after the March 15th deadline, please let us know that in advance. The award will be presented during the League's Annual Conference, June, 11 to 13, in Duluth. Sincerely, ,' , 0 / t / � G-o se Latimer May F, St. Paul President, League of Minnesota Cities 300 hanove^ building. 480 cedar street, sav - t oau;, minnesota 5510^ '73-23222-2861 ' RULES FO G. O. LUMIG AWARD FOR DISTTNGUISHEp MUNICIPAL SERVICE • • ,t. 1. ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE. The award: to be known as the C. C. Ludwig Award shall be • • made in accordance with: the following rules to a deserving Minnesota municipal official or employee of a city, village, borough, or town which is a member of the League of Minnesota Cities. The award shall be made at an appropriate time during the annual convention of the League of Minnesota Cities. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR AWARD. The award shall be made to the official or employee who has in the opinion of the judges, the most outstanding record of public service for a city among those nominated for the award. To be eligible, an official must have been in • office sometime during the year preceding the deadline date for submitting nominations. In making their determination, the judges shall take into account the following factors: a. The extent to which breadth of vision, statesmanship and unselfish concern for the general good have been characteristic of the nominee's public life. In the evaluation of this characteristic, importance shall be attached to the following: (1) Service above and beyond that which is required by the nominee's position. . (2) Contributions of the nominee in the interests of improved municipal govern- ment through national, state, county, municipal, professional, or other . public organisations or agencies. • • b. The nature and extent of the improvement in municipal government or nominee's municipality attributable to nominee's municipal service and the lasting character of such improvement. • c. The respect in which nominee is held by the community, and the influence nominee has had in raising the prestige of municipal government service. d. The length of nominee's municipal service. This factor shall not be considered as important as other criteria except that service of the nominee should have been long enough to have established a pattern of continued, unselfish conduct in office. • • No'award shall be made in any year in which, in the opinion of the judges, no nominee meets the standards of exellence contemplated by these rules. The judges may make two awards in one year when, in their opinion, two nominees meet the standards contemplated by these rules; provided, however, if two awards are made, one must be made to an official of a municipality of less than 10,000 population. 3. NOMINATIONS. Nominations may be submitted by any one of the following: a. The council of a member city; • b. Any 10 citizens of a member city; or c. Any civic organization concerned with local government. • The nominations shall be mailed or delivered to the office of the League of ,Minnesota Cities no later than March 15 of the year in which the award is to be made. I•.'ailed nominations shall be postmarked no later than the last date for submission of nomi- nations. The nominations shall be made upon forms prepared and distributed by the League Executive Director. Suitable and timely announcement shall be made soliciting nominations for the award. • 4. JUDGES. No later than the last day for nominations each year, the president of the League of Minnesota Cities shall choose three or five persons as judges to select the C. C. Ludwig Award winner for that year. Judges shall'be outstanding Minnesota citizens or public officials who are not eligible forte award, except that if five judges are appointed no more than two may be members of the Board of Directors . of the League of Minnesota Cities. 5; These rules may be amended in general or in any particular at a recuiar or special meeting of the Board of Directors of the League of Minnesota Cities. • G INSTRUCTIONS FOR NOMINATING CANDIDkTES FOR THE ANNUAL , C. C. LUDWIG AWARD FOR DISTIINGUISHED MUNICIPAL SERVICE .Nominations may be made by a city council or by 10 citizens of the city or by any civic organization concerned with local government, such as a local League of Women Voters, a Chamber of Commerce, service clubs. The person nominated must be (or have been during the year ending March 15) a Minnesota municipal official or employee but not necessarily from the city making the nomination..- If the nominee is from another city, the nomination form may be left incomplete if information is insufficient. If the person to be nominated has been nominated in a previous year, it is not necessary to duplicate information and supporting material already available. A simple letter re- submitting the nomination will be sufficient but it should be supplemented with any additional information that may be of importance to the judges. -Size of the city will not be a factor; individuals will be evaluated in terms of their contributions as compared with the general nature of the problems and challenges facing the city. PLEASE BE SPECIFIC IN ANSWERING QUESTIONS. References to concrete examples and situations will necessarily be of greater significance than general•statements in evaluating the nominees.. • • Those making the nomination will want to keep in mind the .following factors which the judges will take into account in determining the winner of the C. C. Ludwig Award: • 1. The extent of which breadth of vision, statemanship and unselfish concern • for the general good have been characteristic of the nominee's public life. In the evaluation of this characteristic, importance shall be attached to . the following: (a) Service above and beyond that which is required by the nominee's position. (b) Contributions of the nominee in the interests of improved municipal • government, through national, state, county, municipal, professional, or other public organizations or agencies. 2. The nature and extent of the improvement in municipal government or nominee's municipality attributable to the nominee's municipal service and the lasting character of such improvement. 3. The respect in which the nominee is held by his/her community, and the influence he /she has had in raising the prestige of municipal government service. 4. The length of nominee's municipal service. This factor shall not be considered as important as other criteria except that service of the nominee should have been long enough to have established a pattern of continued, unselfish conduct in office. Please consult the rules for more specific information on eligibility and timing of the nomination., • NO }JINATION FORM (If additional space is needed, use reverse side or attach extra sheets. Please be as specific as possible in answering all questions.) . Naze of Person Nominated Date from the City of _ _._ Age of nominee Present Municipal Position , a position held since 19___ Previous Public Positions held: YEARS 19 to 19 2. • 19 to 19 • 3. 19 to 19 19 to 19 Positions held in Organizations (County, Regional, State, National) of cities or city officials. 19 to 19 2 . 19 to 19 3• 19 to 19 Other Public Service (as chair or member of citizens' committees or organizations, etc.). Indicate also the achievements, in general terms of the committee or•organization while the nominee was a member or the nominee's contribution or record as a member: Name of Committee or Organization Year(s) Nature of Work . Office Held 2. 3. • • 4. 5. Local Elections in which Nominee Has Been a Candidate: Office Scugnt Year(s) Result • • Nomination Form . - 2 - Municipal Accomplishments for which Nominee waa Wholly or Partly Responsible (and role of nominee in the accomplishments) : • 1. 2. 3. • 4. 5. Awards or Citations for Municipal Accomplishments: . 1. 2. 3. • 4. • Other Evidence that Nominee is Held in High Public Esteem: • • Other Facts Bearing on Nominee's Qualifications to be the Award Recipient: 1• 2. 4. Supplementary Documents. The nomination may be supported by any other material bearing on the factors which the judges are required to take into account in determining the a- ward winner. (This material may include, but need not be limited to, (1) newspaper edi- torials, articles, and pictures; (2) letters of appreciation from citizens or other of- ficials; (3) letters of recommendation from public officials or community leaders.) This nomination is submitted by: a. Name of organization b. The City Council of c. The following ten citizens of • Name . Street Address (if any) s a, { till 1 iiiiiffi—n-T1 . 144 league of minnesota cities - January 25, 1980 TO: Officers of League of Minnesota Cities Affiliated Organizations FROM: Darlyne M. Lang, Office Manager League of Minnesota Cities • SUBJECT: 1980 LMC Annual Conference • Your assistance is asked in formalizing the program structure for the 1980 League of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference to be held in Duluth, June 11 -13, 1980. Since space needs with the Duluth Arena - Auditorium and hotels must be confirmed shortly, an indication from affiliated organizations regarding their potential plans is required. The enclosed questionnaire has been developed based on past participation. Whatever informa- tion you can provide at this time would be greatly appreciated. Also enclosed is a general outline of this year's conference format. As in past years, time has been set aside for Association lunches on Thursday, June 12. Although we realize that much planning lies ahead, I would appreciate if you would return the form to this office by February 15th at the latest. We face a February 25 deadline for printing the preliminary schedule in our monthly magazine, Minnesota Cities. Thank you. DMLglb 300 hanover building, 480 cedar street, saint paul, minnesota 55101 C61 2) 222 -2861 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1980 CONFERENCE Affiliated Association Programs Name of Association: • Completed by: Yes, we wish to participate in 1980 No, we do not wish to participate in 1980 1. Type of event (check all that apply) Workshop Business meeting • Board meeting • Other 2. Meal function (check all that apply) Breakfast • Lunch Dinner Reception 3. Time frame (Please indicate the days plus starting and ending times of each event on the chart below) Wednesday Thursday Friday Morning Lunch Afternoon Dinner Evening 4. Speaker (if appropriate) A. A speaker has been designated and contact made by this association. Yes No Name Topic B. A speaker is needed. Yes No • Topic OVER