HomeMy WebLinkAboutFebruary 05, 1980 .
TENTATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 5, 1980
Mayor Harbeck presiding
1] Roll Call'at 7:30 P.M.
2] Approval of Minutes of Dec. 18th and 21, 1979; and Jan. 2nd & 15th, 1980
3] Communications:
a] Shakopee ,Community Services
b] League of Cities re: Legislative Action Conference
c] League of Cities re: Board Vacancies
d r Bus Riders
e Metropolitan Health Board
t
4] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers:
a] Cncl.Colligan from the Fire Dep't.; Jt. Seven Man Committee
b] Cncl.Hullander from Scott County Criminal Justice Advisory Comm.
c] Cncl.Lebens from the Community Services Board
d] Cncl.Leroux from the Shakopee School Board
e' Cncl.Reinke from the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
f] Mayor Harbeck from Scott County Board of Commissioners
5] RECOGNITION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANYONE PRESENT IN THE AUDIENCE
WHO DESIRES TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA.
6] Old Business:
a] Public bearing on applications for On Sale & Sunday Liquor
Licenses by Garcia's Inc. - continued from Jan. 15th
7] Planning Commission Recommendations:
a] Final Plat of Ziegler 1st Addition, a 40 acre tract lying W of
CR -89, S of Hwy 101, and N of RR tracks
Developer: Ziegler Inc., Rauenhorst Corp., 7600 Xerxes Ave. So.
Action: Resolution No. 1559
8] Routine Resolutions and Ordinances:
a] Res. No. 1555, Amending the 1980 Pay Schedule
b] Res. No. 1556, Abating Special Assessments
c] Res. No. 1562, Setting Forth City Council Procedural Policy On
Appointments t� City Boards and Commissions
d] Res. No. 1560, Giving Preliminary Approval to Industrial Revenue
Bonds for Ashland Inc.
e] Res. No. 1561, Giving Final Approval to Industrial Revenue Bonds
for Scottland Inc.
9] New Business:
a] 8:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Industrial Revenue Bonds for J and B
Enterprises
b] 8:40 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a conditional use permit
for a home occupation to construct a pole barn for storage and
maintenance of tracter trailers, to be located at 2540 Marschall Rd.
in R -1 zone
Applicant: Dallas Herrgott, 1069 Van Buren
/
Action: Resolution No. 239
Planning Comm. Action: Approval of Res. No. 239 granting request
c] Dog Catcher Agreement
d] Appointment to Police Civil Service Commission
e] Discussion on limits on Industrial Revenue Bonds
f] Discussion on reclassification of Dep. Treasurer & Assessing Sec'y.
•
TENTATIVE AGENDA
February 5, 1980
Page -2- -;
g] Fire Service Rates
h] Outstanding Fire Call Bills
i] Authorize filling CETA Position
, j] City Engineer's status report on Public Improvements
k] Approving Plans & Specs on 4th & Mn. Project Improvements
1] Approving Specs on Demolition of structures at 4th & Mn. site
m] Discussion on assessment policy for reconstruction
n] Res. No. 1557 - Receiving A Report and Calling A Hearing On
An Improvement - 80 -1 (San. Sewer Laterals for NZ of 8- 115 -22)
o] Res. No. 1558 - Declaring Adequacy of A Petition and Ordering
Preparation of A Report -80 -2 (East View 1st Add'n)
p] Res. No. 1559 - Receiving A Report, Ordering An Improvement,
and Directing Preparation of Plans - 80 -2 (East View 1st Add'n.)
q] Change Order No. 1 (amended) for rough grading at Kmart site
10] Consent Business:
a] Approving Interfund Transfers
b] Liaison appointments
11] Other Business:
a]
b]
12] 10:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Revocation or suspension of On Sale
3.2 Beer License of Brook Superettes, Inc., 615 Marschall Road
13] Adjourn to ...
Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
. i
, L
TENTATIVE AGENDA
( SHAKOPEE HOUSING AND,REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
REGULAR SESSION
FEBRUARY 5, 1980
Chrm.Hullander presiding.
1] Roll Call at 7:30 P.M.
2] Approval of Minutes of January 2nd and 15th, 1980
3] Review of plans for Neighborhood Revitalization Project at 4th and
Minnesota Streets prior to advertisement of bids for demolition,
and review of plans for street and utility improvements
4] Transfer of $1,234.04 from the 1977 Community Development Fund
to the H.R.A. Fund
5] Approval of the Bills:
a] Dorsey, Windhorst, Hannaford, Whitney and Halladay, professional
services for sale of tax increment bonds for elderly highrise,
- $1,480.00, from bond proceeds
b] Von Klug and Associates - $1,395.45
4th and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization
November Services 801.78
Appraisal for Heitz relocation 150.00
Elderly Highrise
• November Services 368.67
Estimate for moving expense for
Mendens 75.00
c] Leroy and Sharon Heitz moving expenses, $2,340.30
Telephone installation 46.15
Cartage (by Hill - Global Moving ,
Service) $2,294.15
d] Scottland Inc., for costs incurred developing Lot 13,
Block 1, Valley Park 5th Add'n., for the Industrial
Park water tank, $17,848.84, from bond proceeds.
6] Other business:
7] Adjourn.'
Jeanne Andre
H.R.A. Director
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Annual Meeting Shakopee, Minnesota January 2, 1980
Chrmn. Hullander called the meeting to order at 740 PM with Comm.
Lebens, Leroux, Reinke and Colligan present. Also present:
Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator; Jeanne Andre, Administrative
Assistant; H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer and Julius A. Coller, II,
City Attorney.
City Attorney administered the oath of office to Commissioners
re- appointed Hullander and Leroux and newly appointed Commissioner,
Dean Colligan.
Lebens /Reinke moved to approve the minutes of December 4, 1979,
as kept. Motion carried unanimously.
Lebens /Hullander moved to appoint John Leroux as Chairman of the
HRA.
Comm. Reinke stated that since the HRA is involved in two major
projects, he would like to see Comm. Hullander continue as Chrmn.
' for 1980.
Lebens /Hullander moved to withdraw their motion to appoint Comm.
Leroux as Chrmn. of the HRA. Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux /Reinke moved to nominate Comm. Hullander as Chrmn. of the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority.
Leroux /Colligan moved that nominations cease and a unanimous
ballot be cast for Comm. Hullander as Chrmn. of the HRA. Motion
carried unanimously.
Hullander /Reinke moved to nominate Comm. Leroux as Vice - Chrmn.
of the Shakopee HRA.
Leroux /Reinke moved that nominations cease and a unanimous ballot
be cast for Comm. Leroux to service a Vice - Chrmn. of the HRA.
Motion carried unanimously.
Reinke /Hullander moved to nominate Comm. Lebens as Secretary of
the Shakopee HRA.
Leroux /Reinke moved that nominations cease and a unanimous ballot
be cast for Comm. Lebens as Secretary of the HRA. Motion carried
unanimously.
v
Official Proceedings of the Page -2-
Shakopee HRA January 2, 1980
Leroux /Reinke moved to approve the plans and specifications on the
highrise for the elderly pending final approval by the Shakopee
Building Inspector.
Roll Call: Ayes - Hullander, Colligan, Reinke, Leroux
Noes - Lebens Motion carried
Admin. Asst. asked for input from the HRA on the goals of the
Metropolitan Council for the 1980 -1982 Subsidized Housing Allocation •
Plan. Discussion was held. No recommendations made at this time.
Reinke /Lebens moved to approve the following bills: VonKlug and
Associates, August Services on Neighborhood Revitalization Project
in the amount of $150.00; Scott County HRA for services under the
August 8, 1978 agreement for the amount of $1200.00; Administrative
fees for the Metropolitan Council HRA Section 8 Existing Program in
the amount of $280.50; National Asso. of Housing and Redevelopment
Officials (NAHRO) annual membership in the amount of $30.00 and to
the Minnesota Chapter of NAHRO annual membership in -the amount of
$25.00.
Roll Call: Ayes - Hullander, Reinke, Leroux, Lebens
Noes - none
} Abstain - Colligan Motion carried
Reinke /Leroux moved to approve the following bills: Paul Wermerskirchen
Abstract Co., for abstract continuation for George Ries property
in the amount of $41.00; Julius A. Coller for advancement for Eminent
Domain proceedings on the 4th and Minnesota Project in the amount
of $101.94 and to 200 Levee Drive Asso. for return of advancement for
purchase of highrise site in the amount of $69,685.60.
Roll Call: Ayes - Hullander, Lebens, Reinke, Leroux
Noes - none
Abstain - Colligan Motion carried
Admin. Ass't. reported on the progress of the 4th and Minnesota
Project stating that providing all the properties are vacated,
demolition should occur in the month of March 1980.
Leroux /Reinke moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting
adjourned at 8:00 PM.
Douglas S. Reeder
Deputy Director, HRA
•
•
Y - y
PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Special Session Shakopee, Minnesota January 15, 198
Chrmn. Hullander called the meeting to order at 7 :30 PM with Comm.
Reinke, Leroux, Lebens and Colligan present. Also present: City
Admin., Douglas S. Reeder; Admin. Assistant, Jeanne Andre; Ass''t.
City Attorney, Rod Krass.and Mayor Harbeck.
Reinke /Lebens moved to approve Special Meeting Notice. Motion
carried unanimously.
Leroux /Lebens moved to approve the minutes of December 18, 1979, as
kept. Motion carried unanimously.
Reinke /Leroux moved to concur with the recommendations of the Admin.
Ass't. and not to appeal the Commissioners Report on Eminent Domain
Proceedings for the 4th and Minnesota Project. Motion carried
unanimously.
Discussion was held on the proposed 1980 time schedule for the 4th
and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project as set up by the
Admin. Asst.
Leroux /Reinke moved that George Castanguay be allowed to stay and
rent the Rein Trucking troperty, until March 31, 1980, per request
by Robert Miller, with the understanding that the City will proceed
with the street and utility construction.
Leroux /Reinke moved to amend the motion to include the other businesses
in the area also who feel that it is necessary to stay through
' March but still with the stipulation that the City will go through
with street and utility construction. Motion carried unanimously.
Upon question from the'chair, shall the main motion as amended now
pass? Motion carried unanimously.
Admin. Ass't. reported that the closing has been completed on the
property for the Elderly Highrise and that all necessary agreements
had been reached with John Bergstad, Developer.
Leroux /Colligan moved to appoint Jeanne Andre as Executive Director
of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Motion carried
unanimously.
Hullander /Lebens moved to approve the bill to the University of
Minnesota for the workshop fee for Jeanne Andre in the amount of
$20.00.
Roll Call: Ayes - unanimous
Noes - none _ Motion carried
• Proceedings of the Housing & January 15, 1980
Redevelopment Authority Page -2-
Reinke /Lebens moved to approve the payment of the balance of the
relocation allocation fund in the amount of $1,786.71 and the
payment of the telephone installation due to the relocation in the
amount. of $28.25, as well as the missing option payment in the
amount of $250.00 to the Mendens.
Roll Call: Ayes - unanimous
Noes - none Motion carried
Colligan /Leroux moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting
adjourned at 7:50 PM.
Jeanne Andre
Executive Director
Housing and Redevelopment Authority
•
MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director
RE: Policy on Storage of Goods Necessitated by Relocation
DATE: February 5, 1980
The question of interim storage has arisen in the relocation of
certain business tenants in the Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood
Revitalization Project. According to HUD relocation regulations,
we are permitted to pay for storage of goods removed during
relocation for up to one year. However, the individual authority
involved can establish the conditions under which it will be
considered necessary to store goods, and reimburse the tenant
for expenses so incurred.
I recommend that the HRA reimburse for storage only when a new
site has been established for relocation, but is unavailable at
the time the tenant must relocate. Storage costs will then be
paid from the time of vacation from the project site until the
new site becomes available, not to exceed one year.
JA /jiw
•
•
0 )
� Minnesota
Tom Rees ` r%
District 36B ` ' • House of
Carver -Scott Counties a�ti
Committees: _ Representatives
Governmental Operations - —
Financial Institutions and `�' .1,
Insurance Rodney N. sea"�1``
Insurance — peaker,
Energy and Utilities r
Alternative Energy Subcommittee, Chairman
REES REPORTER - Start Up - 1980 Session AN3 1 1980
To: Local Elected Leaders and Administrators HAKOp
A "Happy New Year" to those of you I have not had an opportunity to see since
the decade of the '80s has started.
Reorganization of the House has taken place and we're ready to go to work for
you Some subjects of interest:
Energy 'Conservation
I urge each political subdivision to evaluate, if you haven't already, the
measures you can take to SAVE ENERGY: Any help that I can provide, please
feel free to call. Also, I'd like to hear your ideas.
Emergency Fuel Assistance
This should be a highly publicized issue with a sharp division as to total dollar
amount to be dedicated by the State and the method of delivery. I am in support
of using existing delivery mechanisms and placing primary responsibility upon
elected county officials for implementation for a temporary program.
Major River Crossing
I am still hammering away at State officials as to our need to increase the total
available river crossing capacity. With a December 1983 Coast Guard Permit
expiration date for the Bloomington Ferry Bridge, it is up to all of us to keep
the issue alive. Congressman Hagedorn has been very cooperative in helping on
the Federal level.
Minnesota Education Association Proposed PELRA Amendments -
I'd appreciate your comments on changes proposed by 'AEA to the PELRA law.
Education - Transportation Aid Formula
For those of you.who have not contacted me concerning the effects of the
transportation aid formula, please do so.
Money for Road and Bridge Construction
I'd appreciate your feelings about a gas tax.
Enclosed are several copies of "Precinct Caucuses in Minnesota: A Dialogue for
Voters." I encourage you to pass out the extras and if you can use more, please
contact me.
I look forward to a short session. Thanks for your help;
Tom Rees
State Representative
•
Replyto: ❑ 365 State Office Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 (612) 296 -6926 (
❑ Box 46, Elko, Minnesota 55020 (612) 469 -4190 ��
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
`1'l ENgy«
129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
, I ly
ME
TO: Jeanne Andre, HRA Director
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Closeout of 1977 C.D. Fund
DATE: January 23, 1980
Request the HRA approve transfer of all assets and fund balance
($1,234.04) to the HRA fund to effect the closeout of the fund
following completion of the project (Bluff St.) and close of
the agent.
Action: Motion to approve the close of the Community Development
Fund and the transfer of account balances to the HRA fund.
GV /ljw
•
•
•
MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: Jeanne Andre, HRA Director
RE: Approval of Bills
DATE: February 1, 1980
I recommend payment of the following bills:
00) • 1] Dorsey, Windhorst, Hannaford, Whitney and Halladay for
professional services provided in the sale of tax - increment
bonds for the elderly highrise at 200 Levee Drive, $1,480.00.
2] Mo Mg expenses MinnesottreetLforrythedNeighborhoodzRevitalization from
C 412 Minnesota $2,340.30.
Project at 4th and Minnesota Streets,
This payment was recommended by our relocation consultant,
Von Klug and Associates. I have reviewed their documentation
and payment of 1) $46.15 for installation of phones equal
to their previous service and 2) cartage of their possessions
by the moving company with the lowest bid, is in order.
3] Von Klug and Associates - $1,395.45 which includes their
1..)f professional services for the month of November and reimburse-
ment for payments made by Von Klug to outside consultants
providing services to persons relocated by HRA projects.
•
JA /jsc
MEMO TO: Jeanne Andre, HRA Director
FROM: H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Development Costs for Lot 13, Block 1, Valley Park 5th Addn.
DATE: January 31, 1980
Attached please find letter from Scottland, Inc. and Valley
Engineering Company regarding costs for development of Lot 13,
Block 1, Valley Park 5th Addn., the lot for the tank site in
the Industrial Park.
I have reviewed the computations of Mr. Steve Harvey, Valley
Engineering and agree with the total amount specified in the
letter from Gary Eastlund, the amount of $17,848.84.
HRS:nae
, N
- d `‘4.-
J
i y
11., ,_. a1. "3 " i
SCOTTL INC. ,., , :.f t °, , , w -.,.. -. , fi px r _� , .. .
"THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPER" 5244 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL BLVD. S. • SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 •612.4453242
RECEIVED
January 28, 1980
JAN 2 9 1980
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Mr. Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Doug:
Enclosed are copies of bills totaling $17,848.84 which were
incurred for Lot 13, Block 1, Valley Park Fifth Addition.
If you need additional information or have any questions,
please give me a call.
Sincerely,
A rY - 2 - S - tlund
Senior Vice President
SCOTTLAND INC.
GE /jvb
Enclosures
WL LEY %
CEN
4 NDUSTRY6
Civil Engineers
Land Surveyors
Planners I
i t Valley Engineering •Co., Inc.
�
Telephone 447 -2570 Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372
September 11, 1979
•
Mr. Gary Eastland
Scottland, Inc.
Valley Industrial Park
P.O. Box 39
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 •
Subject: V.I.P. 5th Addition
Dear Gary:'
The costs of constructing watermain and appurtenances for Lot 13,
Block 1 of the subject project over and above the watermain looping
requirement are estimated as follows.
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1$" D.I.P. 103 L.F. $ 33.00 /LF $3,399.00
1$" D.I.P. vs. 12" D.I.P.
crossing Co. Rd. $3 72 L.F. $ 14.30 /LF $1,029.60
6" D.I.P. 50 L.F. $ 14.00 /LF $ 700.00
Fittings (1$ "x12" Tee) 61 Lbs. $ 1.20 /LB $ 76$.00
Fittings (1$ "x6" Tee) 590 Lbs. •$ 1.20 /LB $ 70$.00
Fittings (12 " -90° Bend) 255 Lbs. $ 1.20 /LB $ 306.00
Fittings (6 " -90° Bend) $5 Lbs. $ 1.20 /LB $ 102.00
Fittings (1$" Plug) 190 Lbs. $ 1.20 /LB $ 22$.00
1$" Butterfly Valve &
Vault 2 Each $2300.00 /EA $4,600.00
1$ "x18" Wet Tap vs. 1$ "x12"
Wet Tap 1 Each $1100.00 /EA $1,100.00
Blow off Valve Assembly 1 Each $2300.00 /EA $2,300.00
TOTAL $15,240.60
•
These costs are based on the unit prices quoted by Erickson
Construction, Inc. on August 7, 1979. Please use this information
in the preparation of the development contract with the City of
Shakopee. If you have any questions or need additional information,
please call.
Very truly yours
Steven D. Harvey, P.E.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Civil Engineers
Land Surveyors
Planners
i �,
Valley Engineering Co., Inc.
Telephone 447 -2570 Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372
November 21, 1979
Mr. Gary Eastland, Senior Vice President •
Scottland, Inc.
5244 Valley Industrial Boulevard South
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Subject: V.I.P. 5th Addition
Storm Drainage
Dear Gary:
We have estimated the storm sewer improvement costs in the 5th
Addition according to the attached itemization. The unit cost per
square foot of lot area is determined to be $ 0.0244. The benefit
to Lot 13, Block 1 is estimated to be $ 0.0244 x 106,$95 sq. ft. =
$ 2,60$.24. Please use this amount in your development agreement with
the City of Shakopee.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please
call.
Sincerely
D,/,444„,
Steven D. Harvey, P.E'r`
•
•
•
•
•
COST ESTIMATE V.I.P. 5TH ADDITION
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
'November 21, 1979
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
Common Excavation 5600 C.Y. $ 0.7$ /CY $ 4,36$.0
Seed & Mulch LUMP SUM $ 750.00
1$" CMP..CulV'ert 1$ ga. 60 L.F. $ 26.00 /LF $ 1,560.00
Discharge MH & Pipe LUMP SUM $ 1,500.00
1$" CMP Apron Ends 4 Each $ 115.00 /EA $ 460.00
36" x 22" Arch Conc. 120 L.F. $ 42.00 /LF $ 5,040.
Turf Restoration $ 200.00
Restoration of Blvd. 70 S.Y. $ 13.00 /SY $ 910.00
Rip Rap & Filter Blanket 10 S.Y. $ 1$.00 /SY $ 1$0.00
SUBTOTAL $ 14,9
ADMINSTRATIVE, FISCAL, LEGAL, ENGINEERING AND $ 3,742.00
SURVEYING @ 25%
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $ 1$,710.00
TOTAL CONTRIBUTING AREA, LOTS 5 THRU 13 = 17.632 Acres = 76$,06$ Square
Feet
UNIT CONSTRUCTION COST PER SQUARE FOOT = $ 0.0244
•
i1
MEMO TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director
RE: Approval of bill submitted by Suburban Engineering
DATE: February 4, 1980
The City Received the attached bill from Suburban Engineering
for professional services provided for platting of the 4th and
Minnesota Streets Neighborhood Revitalization Project (Macey Second
Addition).
The bill has been reviewed by the City Engineer. On his
recommendation, I am forwarding it to you for approval.
JA /jsc •
INVOICE 6
Main Office 571-6066
• t UBURBAN - 6875 Highway No. 65 N. E.
4
NGINEERING Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432
INC. _ _
South Office 890 -6510 0
N ,' Civil, Municipal & Environmental Engineering 1101 Cliff Road •
Land Surveying • Land Planning • Soil Testing Burnsville, Minnesota 55337
PLEASE REMIT TO MAIN OFFICE
P., ..
a
. f-- , , 4 - 1 DATE Jan. 31,19 80
` City of Shakopee
129 1st Ave ..East INVOICE NO. s 16,766
•i • Shakopee, MN 55379
1 NET 30 days — legal interest will be charged monthly thereafter.
. , ' . - - , � ".' "• ., ' .•' - : Minimum charge 50¢. ,_.
QUANTITY DESCRIPTION i , AMOUNT
E5CRIPTION
O `' Re: Boundary and Topographic surveys - HRA area
«,`, ,, of Market St. and Fourth Ave. (S.O. 934) •
�' '• For City. Attorney's meeting with a pr
:i ` � y aisers
g p
`' ', • • Office and field time setting approximate corners
•
' on Parcels I,J &G at 4th Ave.
If .• Surveyor'` : 1 hour @ $32.00 • $ 32.00
,, . man`crew • 8 hour @ $42.00,= $336.00
TOTAL TDIJE $368.00
•
V ., ,• *-- '.4.,:., v4 l"i'4'
4 " ' ' ' , - '. •
,N `
•; k s F ti * na C E Er -
�• / [S 4 1980
_ + a /YT 1 OF SHAK0PEE
i
i
3 aJ
tt�2II PP TonuttunitU'truitiII
129 Levee Drive
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Phone`445 -2742
GEORGE F. MUENCHOW
Director January 24, 1980
City Council
129 East 1st Av.
Shakopee, Mn. 55379
Please be informed that the Shakopee Community Services Board
at its January 21 Meeting established the evening of March 31, 1980,
as the time for the residents of the Scenic Heights, J.E.J., and
Hauers Additions of Shakopee to come together to discuss a Proposed
Community Park to be located in their neighborhood just east and
immediately adjacent to the Shakopee Junior High School. The
meeting time is 7:30 P.M., and the location will be the Shakopee
Junior High School Lunch Room.
The Community Services Board is hopeful that as many as possible
of your members and appropriate staff will be able to be in attendance
for what should be an informative evening. Please notate this on your
calendar now. Similar invitations also are being extended to the
Shakopee Planning Commission and the Shakopee School Board.
An agenda with planned presentations will be prepared and will
be announced within the next month. We would further envision that
members of the audience might have questions regarding other subjects
pertaining to city and school operation and time periods will be alloted
for this.
Sincerely,
,Wk"
George F. Muenchow, Director
Shakopee Community Services
z
3 J
IIII 1 _ �
j
JA
of minnesota
LL-J
January 7, 1980
TO: Mayors, Managers and Clerks in Member Cities
(Please call to the attention of the council) •
The League of Minnesota Cities and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
are jointly sponsoring a mid- session Legislative Action Conference again this
year, and we urge every member city to send representatives to the conference
and reception for legislators on Wednesday, February 20.
,• The program this year:
o Mid Morning - Legislative Policy Committee meetings, leaders
as panel and guests
o Luncheon Session - with Legislative guests
o Two general afternoon sessions -
1) Governor Albert Quie invited, speaking on the
constitutional amendments he proposes.
2) Labor relations address and a question and answer
session by the League lobbyists.
From 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. the League of Minnesota Cities and the Association of
Metropolitan Municipalities are inviting all legislators to be our guest for a
reception. This will be an opportunity to make contact with local legislators
and is a very important part of our lobbying effort.
The conference this year will be held at the Holiday Inn, St. Paul located at
161 St. Anthony Street, St. Paul, Minnesota -- just off I94 at Marion Street exit
near junction with I35, only blocks from the State Capitol.
Also enclosed in this mailing is a registration form and we encourage you to
pre - register, if it:is possible for you to do so. The conference fee for city
officials is $20 for any portion of the meeting.
° cerely,
(
'
Donald A. Slater Vern Peterson
Executive Director Executive Director
League of Minnesota Cities Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
DAS:VP:kgj
300 hanover building, 480 cedar street, saint paul, minnesota 55101 C6123 222 -2861
•
P
111111115
LOW 'iii
league of minnesota cities
1980 Legislative Action Conference
co- sponsored by the
League of Minnesota Cities
and
. Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
Wednesday, February 20
Holiday Inn -St. Paul
161 St. Anthony Street„ St. Paul
' Just off I94 at Marion Street exit near junction with I35
9:45 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - Legisi:ative Policy Committee meetings
12:00 to 1:30 p.m. - General luncheon with panel of legislators
2:30 p•.m. to 3:45 p.m. m General afternoon session with special guest
speaker Governor Albert Quie
4:00 p.m. to 5:00.p.m. - LaborAle.lations cAddress.'
Ask. the gue aobbyi st
5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. - Reception for Minnesota Legislators
Mail to: Gayle L. Bortz 1980 LEGISLATIVE ACTION CONFERENCE
League of Minnesota Cities Wednesday, February 20
480 Cedar Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
Please make reservation(s) for for the Legislative
Action Conference. (city)
Registration Fee -- $20 per registrant Check enclosed in the amount of $
The following persons will attend from my city: (Please print or type)
NAME TITLE
300 hanover building, 480 cedar street, saint paul, minnesota 55101 C6123 222 -2861
3 c._.
I 1
1.16.-J.H nn
league of minnesota cities
January 7, 1980
TO: All Member Officials •
(c /o Mayor and Manager or Clerk)
SUBJECT: 1980 Nominations for Board Vacancies
This is a request for your advice in proposing candidates for the Board of Directors
of the League of Minnesota Cities. Two vacancies have occurred, Mayor D. J. Black,
Hutchinson, President of the League of Minnesota Cities and Bob Beaudin, Mayor of
Duluth, are no longer in office as of January 1980. Mayor Latimer of St. Paul,
Vice President of the League, has, according to,our bylaws, become president. It
is probable that the nominating committee will consider a Board member for vice
president, leaving twoovacanacies on the Board of Directors to be filled.
A nominating committee will work•with guidelines for Board representation which
were developed as a,result'of the. deliberations of past nominating committees.
Those guidelines appear on the reverse side of this letter. We will also work
with the enclosed map, which shows the.location.of cities that will continue to
be represented on the Board.
The Nominating Committee is planning to hold a meeting January 14, 1980 and it
would be helpful to have your input. If you know an official who would be consi-
dered for nomination, please give his or her name and a brief resume of qualifi-
cations to the League staff or me. This communication can be as informal as you
wish: a phone call is all that is needed.
Our goal is to make sure that any good candidate is considered. Whether or not to
let an individual know that you are submitting his or her name is, of course, up
to you. The Nominating Committee, however, makes it a practice to confirm the
fact that an individual is willing to serve before presenting his or her name to
the Board of Directors.
On behalf of the Nominating Committee, I want to thank you in advance for your
help and to assure you that all suggestions will be seriously considered.
Sincerely,
h '7^7// �l
Dave Hozza
St. Paul
Chairman, Nominating Committee
DH:kgj
(OVER)
300 hanover building, 480 cedar street, saint paul, minnesota 55101 C6123 222 -2861
•
•
•
•
•
GUIDELINES FOR BOARD REPRESENTATION
L
1 11
°
.0•
Jt4
z•
4 11"
p.
4
.'4' ''
{ . • S • ' ) ‘ - 1. t`
..-. „.....,... ,....., , _.,.....„‘ , * - .5; 4' -* ' . •• -
+ ,t y k , �FrJ'
• 1 .,,,,., 1. a
E v ■
■
• a + , ,
•t • o ;.- ..
+
5,
Zita� _ 3 &
'4 o RECEIVED
y fi 4.7 JAN 3 01980
4% 774.11;6 CITY OF SHAKOPEE
METROPOLITAN 4 �
H AALT IN Cry's -- � Q'
300 Metro Square Building, 7th Street and Robert Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Area 612, 291 - 6359
January 28, 1980
TO: Metropolitan Area Citizens and Government Officials
FROM: The Metropolitan Council /Metropolitan Health Board
The Metropolitan Council and Metropolitan Health Board will jointly hold a
public hearing for the purpose of receiving oral and written comments on the
proposed 1980 -1981 Health Systems Plan, Annual Implementation Plan, and
Application for Renewal of Designation as the Health Systems Agency for the
Seven- County Metropolitan Area on February 28, 1980 at 7:00 p.m. in the
Metropolitan Council Chambers, 300 Metro Square Building, 7th and Robert
Streets, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101. These documents fulfill the require-
ments of the National Health Planning and Resource Development Amendments of
1979 (Public Law 96 -79) for full designation as the Health Systems Agency for
Minnesota Region V, for which the Metropolitan Council intends to apply by
April 2, 1980. The hearing record will be kept open for written comments for
seven days after the hearing or until the end of the business day, March 6,
1980.
Copies of the draft Health Systems Plan, Annual Implementation Plan and the
1980 -1981 grant application are available for public inspection, beginning
January 29, 1980, at the main libraries in Minneapolis, St. Paul and all seven
counties, as well as the Metropolitan Council library and Health Board office.
Copies of those parts and components of the Health Systems Plan affected by
this revision, Annual Implementation Plan and work program and budget for the
agency are available free of charge from the Health Board office, 291 -6352.
Persons wishing to speak at this public hearing may register in advance by
contacting Eleanor Suneson at the Health Board. office, 291 -6352. Those who
register first will be scheduled to speak first. If you cannot attend you are
encouraged to send written comments to the Metropolitan Health Board, up to
seven days following this hearing. For further information contact the
Metropolitan Health Board at 291 -6352.
Charles Weaver, Chairman Coral Houle, Chairperson
Metropolitan Council Metropolitan Health Board
/dc
An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Comprising:
Anoka County 0 Carver County 0 Dakota County 0 Hennepin County 0 Ramsey County 0 Scott County 0 Washington County
6.51; Cell)
l ttkupee C1tummunitg Erutcen
129 Levee Drive
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Phone 445 -2742
GEORGE F. MUENCHOW
DireCtor January 31, 1980
MEMO TO DOUG REEDER.
SUBJECT: ICE RINK SHELTER BUILDINGS CLOSINGS
Doug:
I would appreciate your conveying to the members of the City
Council that the Municipal. Outdoor Ice Skating Rink Shelter
Buildings will close for the season after Sunday, February 10.
This is in accordance with previously announced scheduling
plans which are approximately the same as the dates that we
have closed in past years.
Despite the fact that this decision is based upon many years
of experience, there still are those that think that this is
too early. Council members, of course, usually are the first
to hear these pleadings.
Ice will continue to be maintained as long as weather permits.
The only difference will be that the general public will have
to change their skates outdoors. Coaches of the organized
hockey teams have keys to the buildings so there is no problem
for them.
Last year, our projection was off by one week. Two years ago
we hit it right on the head. Three years ago we missed by one
day. I would say that our record of guessing correctly is
pretty close to $O%. Intermittant periods of warm weather at
this time of year makes for very poor ice. The greatest point
to be made, though, that other than hockey players, the
general public is through ice skating by this time. They're
already thinking of baseball etc.
Thank youl,
George F. Muenchow
•
VL/
MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, Deputy City Clerk
RE: Application for On Sale Liquor Licenses for Garcia's
DATE: February 5, 1980
The applicant had requested that the public hearing scheduled for
January 15th be continued until further arrangements for the lease
of the premises could be completed. At this point in time the
applicant is still not ready to pursue obtaining a license. It
is recommended that the public hearing be continued indefinitely.
jsc
1 76t)
TO: Mayor and City Council ' -
FROM: Tim Keane, City Planner
RE: Final Plat Approval, Zieglers 1st Addition
DATE: February 5, 1980
APPLICANT: Rauenhorst Corporation
LOCATION; County Road 89 and Hwy 101
RFQTTFZT• The applicant is requesting final plat approval of a 41
acre parcel at the intersection of Co. Rd. 89 and Hwy 101. The
plat will be the site of a heavy equipment sales and service
operation.
CONSIDERATIONS.: The Planning Commission unanimously approved the
final plat on January 24, 1980 with the following conditions:
1. Favorable Title Opinion by the City Attorney.
2. Submission of park dedication fee.
3. Submission of legal documents specifying roadway easement
over all of Outlot A.
4. Approval of final drainage plan by the City Engineer.
5. Developer should install aerobic treatment system for
sanitary sewer if the flow exceeds 3,000 gallons per day.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends final plat approval of Ziegler's
First Addition conditioned on:
1. Favorable Title Opinion by the City Attorney.
2. Submission of park dedication fee.
3. Approval of final drainage plan by the City Engineer.
4. Developer should install aerobic treatment system for
sanitary sewer if the flow exceeds 3,000 gallons per day.
TK:nae
I} z" r r ft? "ill 4 : ; -,!":."%!,... = t•x . 44 a ` TI 11 h ,r {{ fi Z
x il t t , , ; r*, � 7 i .t;_.>v.a: " ti + 4. ... i, -v : ,
. {� x * ?„ . ' .� t ✓ f i -; .r ,j�'' �_tA. : . 2 ;,T tVi q`' ,t )' & z ',{.a r a �1C a +,,
� AP `� �r h �� -� 1'k� } i j t ` � S 1l � � fr 4 �' Y T t A * �i M t i Y � "kil. P �T} � ��,�C�'t ,(or • )I
N °,j ' 4 ! "p� F �,A� N V - 4�"� r ,_", i s �r i'.. j 4.4. �•�.1 :'4' a t a ..� ` '' Ya� y 4 ,#A' V •* -".4'4 ! " S' :x „,6',.,14'4,2?
G . rt y § ' - 4. :=Ao. t7.4 t S Z .�! .” V . F: k� I ; `4'.1� Van, ,..".b � l! ,4 tt �, ''114'; 5 a,*'X•- �1''"'."! L
f�y� y'�ie� ras s Y r r 4'rro l� r 1 s r v�� t
, l^ t`4r'.`}'}`.. P,.t �` n ix��, r s wal.f'Kt r ys� .i ,h i.• i
, A Y a: sat Y r ?v Ar } �,�`,�`.{�t'/�1f2` #9:�r <c' t
i ' '' .4 r� 1 d +,, ,'� d } 6 r g W t '�q^n f 'b+i .s f o �A % .4Y w „Yt ..ss { N�,,:y5, .�� , '
l,,, M , ' .,`. { , N y y.. '°, tf 7 .. , '� oft ' ? � t �.',• t a w < a t +d,. �' t, . '3 ^. �, ; v� � fly ^
s : , r �,. Y r A r x �'y p r. k r ati i tS .� } �', ritr
♦ -,g4 ,.. rS% il� ,i ♦ , � 4 :Y ( 'l . s ` C,: S s st' 4 ,rr } , m , AF y 3 1(. it= ij t.:: yR_Y.L 41*'' e a� . ; ro ,, n „ a 1 4 ..1 :- -4-k; -, t t t tiP 4 ` 1 y • , 0
`y • Ai„,,,,,, .k L` i } 1% , r w `.S ' '• ue ' irsl R a N: , wL f 3'= 's.. .ee:=.c ^
h �" t e7,3t�av 'i. all. '' "� �
,
• RESOLUTION NO. 1555 ' `=
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1980 PAY SCHEDULE
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, 1
MINNESOTA, that 1980 pay schedule for the officers and employees
of the City of Shakopee adopted by Resolution No. 1547 hereby
amended'by adding the following: , . • }
Custodian - $ 8,443.00 per 'year
, Police Clerk II $ 11,303.00 per year
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this amendment is retroactive to
I:
January 1, 1980.
-
Adopted in Regular Session of the City Council of the City '
of Shakopee,' Minnesota, held this 5th day of February, 1980.
• .
• Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
• S
.
City' Clerk
Approved as to form this 5th day ,
.of February, 1980.. ,.,
City Attorney
; ;;
1
1
!Pi r w -. • +dn s 4 , ,x �. 'z..`._+�^ P ; �.x1,. � ' � +'.,
. :,r } - ,.: �,•'Y y ,+, " .. ar . ` ac i , i � ti, a c x./ 1.4,4., : ' 'w'� s. } i r'' 0,
y .' � w� n+ ';" r - �T ne r a .. i d •'t° D . � ,E'1^ k� Y - _
'R, t
,7F Y .,,,.r r ..S ♦ p +. k `,� tl Y 'Y �7�.t .�' -`ae H ' ,`�' . ? v. !'� P, Je �.y?rr ♦ ' f� ' 'F. K
aS "������ v,yh�+.ht` tx�rzh �t}'y�:� 'Y 1 . ,����A.�'ye�'" .:� �N t Z y ti.;j?'�,r k.�R:t- c�. � ;''cs�: } � �' ,��. r.��r�', ",it'� ��,•,
,�� '71$ it 4 4 +t' S a *.•zx at'j4. t y �' "t,$`yv 2` sarQ *�iS
tl ua r• • 2 r ,.. � i r
p( a+ _ r , .yak; .k t f p p n .
t ,r� e. .�`- �'.�� r ?',r�r �s�- 'r K y..`.. a 4 �' l..s' , s e � �'St . fr �` V Ott -Y"+ �44 � �d"?i E t
,lPa '4 : y% M""a " t +rl?: F a t i5y -a �h ..r i 4i '� yt
t . � - ^r 7 ' s ,, * t n, nr ' „�
0 . 2r Lt ' *�.;;,, -`- { '1'E'��r ti �? .>.r�: : ^�d,,t �4 ..fr a .zx,a ro..a .. _
'RESOLUTION NO. 1556
A RESOLUTION ABATING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
WHEREAS,'1,special assessments coming due in 1980 were
certified to the County Auditor on November 8, 1979 and;
WHEREAS, assessments on parcel 27- 001 - 0000 - 696 -00 in the
amount of $1,203.93 were paid in full on June 6, 1979;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, that the Scott County Auditor is
requested to,remove special assessments on parcel 27- 001 - 0000- 696 -00
• in the amount of $120.19 plus interest of $70.31, payable in 1980,
from the tax` rolls .
Adopted in adj. reg. session of the City Council of the City
of Shakopee, Minnesota, this day of 1980.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
•
-City Clerk-Administrator
Approved as to form this
day of - 1980
$ ? C ■y
RESOLUTIONNO. 1562
A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH CITY COUNCIL PROCEDURAL
APPOINTMENTS TO CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS""" "`" """ei"
WHEREAS, in accordance with the City Code the Shakopee City Council
has the authority and obligation to appoint persons to the various City
Boards and Commissions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish a procedure for
the appointment of persons to the various City Boards and Commissions.
; ;NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Shakopee City Council
hereby establishes the following procedure to appoint persons to the
various city boards and commissions:
1. When an appointment is required, the City Administrator shall
notify the City Council as early as possible before the
•:s appointment is put on the City Council agenda
2. The City Council shall make an appointment to a city board
or commission only if the appointment appears on the printed
agenda of that meeting or if the appointment was tabled from
a previous meeting
3. The City Council shall follow Roberts Rules of Order in
making nominations for any appointment to be filled. Any
Councilmember can nominate an individual and the nomination
must be seconded by another member. Each Councilmember who
nominates a person for an appointment should either pass out
a resume of that person to the other Councilmembers or be
able to recite some background information about the nominee.
A motion to close nominations can be made and seconded at
any time.
4. After nominations have been closed, if there is more than one
person nominated for an appointment, the City Administrator
shall distribute paper upon which each Councilmember shall
write his preference for the appointment
5. The Mayor shall open the paper ballots and declare the person
getting the most rotes and whether or not he or she received
a majority vote of the Councilmembers present
6. If the person receiving the most votes does' not have a
majority vote of the Councilmembers present, then there shall
be a second paper vote between the top two candidates. If
the vote is a tie, there shall be a second paper vote between
the top two candidates
7. After a candidate has received a majority vote on a paper
ballot, the Mayor shall announce his or her name and the fact
that he or she has a majority vote. At that time a motion is
in order to appoint that person to the position. This motion
shall be voted on and if the person receives a majority, he
or she is then appointed.
Resolution No. 1562 continued
Page -2-
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 5th day of February, 1980.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk .
Approved as to form this
day of February,1980. •
City Attorney
•
•
•
•
•
ly-
RA)
Member introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. LTV
RESOLUTION RELATING TO A $1,000,000
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE NOTE (VALLEY
INDUSTRIAL CENTER I PROJECT) (JOHN BROOKS
HAUSER, LESSEE); AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE
THEREOF PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES,
CHAPTER 474
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota as follows:
Section 1. Definitions
1.01. In this Resolution the following terms,
when used with initial capital letters, have the following
respective meanings unless the context hereof or use
herein clearly requires otherwise:
Act: the Minnesota Municipal Industrial
Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as
amended;
Assignment:. the Assignment of Leases and Rents,
to be given by the Partnership in favor of the Lender;
City: the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, its
successors and assigns;
Financing Statement: the Uniform Commercial Code
Financing Statement to be executed by the.City with
respect to the Pledge Agreement;
Fixtures: those items described as such in
Section 1 -1 of the Mortgage;
Improvements: an office /warehouse facility
containing approximately 62,400 square feet;
Land: the real estate described in Exhibit A to
the Mortgage;
Lender: Transamerica Insurance Company, in Los
Angeles, California, its successors and assigns;
Loan Agreement: the Loan Agreement to be exe-
cuted by the City and the Partnership;
Mortgage: the Combination Mortgage, Security
Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement, to be given
by the Partnership in favor of the Lender;
Note: the $1,000,000 Commercial Development
Revenue Note (Valley Industrial Center I Project)
(John Brooks Hauser, Lessee) to be issued by the City
pursuant to this Resolution;
Partnership: Valley Industrial Center I, a
Minnesota general partnership, its successors and
assigns;
Pledge Agreement: the Pledge Agreement to be
executed by the City and the Lender;
Project: the Land, the Improvements and the
Fixtures as they may at any time exist;
Project Costs: those costs defined as such in
Section 1.01 of the Loan Agreement;
Resolution: this resolution of the City,
adopted , 1980, authorizing the issuance
of the Note.
Section 2. Findings. It is hereby found and
declared that:
•
(a) the real property and improvements described
in the Loan Agreement and the Mortgage constitute a
Project authorized by the Act;
(b) the purpose of the Project is, and the
effect thereof will be to promote the public welfare
by the attraction, encouragement and development of
economically sound industry and commerce so as to
prevent the emergence of or to rehabilitate, so far as
possible, blighted and marginal lands and areas of
chronic unemployment; the retention of industry to use
the available resources of the community in order to
retain the benefit of its existing investment in
educational and public service facilities; halting the
movement of talented, educated personnel of mature age
to other areas and thus preserving the economic and
human resources needed as a base for providing
governmental services and facilities;
• (c) the Project when completed will add to the
tax base of the City, and will accordingly be of
direct benefit to the taxpayers of the City as well as
-2-
those of the County and School District in which the
Project is located.
(d) the Project has been approved by the
Commissioner of Securities of the State of Minnesota
as tending to further the purposes and policies of the _
Act;
(e) the financing of the Project, the issuance
and sale of the Note, the execution and delivery of
the Loan Agreement, the Financing Statement and the
Pledge Agreement and the performance of all covenants
and agreements of the City contained in the Loan
Agreement and the Pledge Agreement and of all other
acts and things required under the Constitution and
laws of the State of Minnesota to make the Note, the
Loan Agreement, the Financing Statement and the Pledge
Agreement valid and binding obligations of the City
enforceable in accordance with their terms, are
authorized by the Act;
(f) it is desirable that the Commercial
Development Revenue Note in the amount of $1,000,000
be issued by the City upon the terms set
forth herein, and that the City assign its interest in
the Loan Agreement and grant a security for the
payment of the principal of, interest on and premium
and late charges, if any, on the Note;
(g) the loan payments contained in the Loan
Agreement are fixed, and required to be revised form
time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and
revenue sufficient to provide for prompt payment of
principal of, premium'and late charges, if any, and
interest on the Note issued under this Resolution when
due, and the Loan Agreement also provides that the
Partnership is required to pay all expenses of, the
operation and maintenance of the Project including,
but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and
all taxes and special assessments levied upon or with
respect to the Project payble during the term of the
Loan Agreement; and
(h) under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Section 474.10, and as to be provided in the Note, the
Note is not to be payable from nor charged upon any
funds of the City other than the revenue under the -
Loan Agreement pledged to the payment thereof; the
City is not subject to any liability thereon; no
Holder of the Note shall ever have the right to compel
-3-
-
any exercise of the taxing power of the City
to pay the Note or the interest or premium or
late charges, if any, thereon, nor enforce pay-
ment thereof against any property of the City
except the revenues under the Loan Agreement
pledged to the payment thereof; and the Note
shall not constitute a debt of the City within
the meaning of any constitutional or statutory
limitation; provided, however, that nothing
contained in this paragraph (h) shall impair
the rights of the Holder or Holders of the Note
to enforce covenants made for the security
thereof as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Sec -
tion.474.
r
Section 3. Authorization and Sale
3.01. Authorization. The City is authorized by
the Act to issue revenue bonds, and loan the proceeds
thereof to business enterprises to finance the acquisition
and construction of "projects" as defined in the Act, and
to make all contracts, execute all instruments and do all
things necessary or convenient in the exercise of such
authority.
3.02. Preliminary City Approval. By Resolution
No. 1396 duly adopted by the Council on May 1, 1979, this
Council gave preliminary approval to the sale of its,
revenue bonds pursuant to the Act and the loan of the .
proceeds to the Partnership for the acquisition and
improvement of the Project suitable for use as an •
office /warehouse building and authorized the preparation
of such documents as may be appropriate to the Project.
3.03. Approval of Documents. Pursuant to the
above, there have been prepared and presented to this
Council copies of the following documents, all of which
are now; or shall,be, placed on file in the office of the
City Clerk:
(a) the Loan Agreement;
(b) the Assignment;
(c) the Pledge Agreement;
(d) the Mortgage; and
•
-4-
(e) the Financing Statement.
The forms of the documents listed in (a) through (e) above
are approved, with such variations, insertions and
additions as are deemed appropriate by the parties and
approved by the City Attorney and City Clerk- Administrator.
Section 4. Execution of Documents. Upon the
completion of the Loan Agreement, the Financing Statement
and the Pledge Agreement, approved in Section 3.03 hereof,
and execution of the Loan Agreement and Pledge Agreement
by the Partnership and the Lender, as the case may be, the
Mayor and the City Clerk - Administrator shall execute the
same on behalf of the City and shall execute the Note in
substantially the form as the Form of Note set forth
following Section 5.01 hereof on behalf of the City, and
shall execute such other certifications, documents or
instruments as bond counsel or counsel for the Lender
shall require, subject to the approval of the City
Attorney, and all certifications, recitals and
representations therein shall constitute the certificates,
recitals and representations of the City. Execution of
any instrument of document by one or more appropriate
officers of the City shall constitute and be deemed the
conclusive evidence of the approval and authorization by
the City and the Council of the instrument or document so
executed. In the absence or disability of the Mayor, any
of the documents authorized by this resolution to be
executed, shall be executed by the acting Mayor, and in
the absence of the City Clerk - Administrator by such
officer of the City who, in the opinion of the City
Attorney, may execute such documents.
Section 5. The Note.
5.01. Form and Authorized Amount. The Note
shall be issued substantially in the form hereinafter set
forth, with such appropriate variations, omissions and
insertions as are permitted or required by this
Resolution, and in accordance with the further provisions
of this Section, in the total principal amount of
$1,000,000.
-5-
•
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF SCOTT
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Commercial Development Revenue Note
(Valley Industrial Center'I Project)
•
(John Brooks Hauser, Lessee)
R -1 $1,000,000
The City of Shakopee, Minnesota, a municipal
corporation of the State of Minnesota (the City), for
value received, hereby promises to pay to the order of
TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, or assigns (the Holder),
at its principal office in Los Angeles, California, or at
such other place as the Holder may designate in writing,
from the source and in the manner, and with interest
thereon as hereinafter provided, the principal sum of ONE
MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000), with interest on the unpaid
principal amount, from the date hereof until this Note is
fully paid, at the rate of nine and three - quarters percent
(9 -3/4 %) per annum, in any coin or currency which at the
time or times of payment is legal tender for the payment
of public or private debts in the United States of
America. This Note is payable in installments due on the
first day of each month as follows:
(a) on 1, 1980, an amount equal to
the interest accrued to that date on the outstanding
principal of this Note; and
(b) commencing on 1, 1980 and on
the first day of each month thereafter to and
including 1, 1995, in equal monthly
installments of Eight Thousand Five Hundred Ninety Two
Dollars ($8,592.00) each, with a final payment of all
principal and accrued interest on 1,
1995, all payments to be applied first to interest and
then to principal.
All interest hereon shall be computed on the
basis of a 365 day year, but charged for the actual number
of days principal is unpaid.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that
the interest on this Note becomes subject to federal
income taxation pursuant to Determination of Taxability
as defined in the Loan Agreement of even date herewith
-6-
(the Loan Agreement) between the City and Valley
Industrial Center I (the Partnership), the interest rate
on this Note shall be increased to eleven and
three - quarters percent (11 -3/4 %) per annum from the Date
of Taxability as defined in the Loan Agreement, in which
case the monthly installment payments hereunder shall be
• immediately computed at such increased rate and the City
shall immediately pay to the Holder of this Note and to
any prior Holder, but solely from the revenues derived
from the Loan Agreement, the aggregate difference between
(A) the amounts actually paid between the Date of
Taxability and the date of such payment and (B) the
amounts that would have been paid to the Holder and any
prior Holder during such period at such increased interest
rate.
If a Determination of Taxability is contested,
monthly installment payments under this Note shall
continue to be payable at the increased interest rate, but
if the contest is successful, the Holder will return to
the Partnership all interest received by it in excess of
nine and three - quarters percent (9- 3/4 %), provided the
Partnership is not then in default under the Loan
Agreement, Mortgage, as hereinafter defined, or
Assignment, as hereinafter defined.
The principal of this Note is not subject to
prepayment prior to the expiration of the tenth loan
year. From and after the expiration of the tenth loan
year, the principal of this Note may be prepaid at any
time, either in whole or in part, on any monthly
installment payment date upon payment of a price equal to
the principal being so prepaid plus accrued interest to
the date of prepayment and subject to a premium expressed
as a percentage of the principal being so prepaid as
follows:
Loan Year Premium
11th 5%
12th 4%
13th 3%
14th 2%
15th 1%
The first loan year is defined as the
twelve -month (12) period commencing 1, 1980.
Subsequent loan years shall run consecutively, each
commencing upon the anniverary of the commencement of the
first loan year. Any prepayments shall be made on at
-7-
least thirty (30) days' advance written notice to the
Holder of this Note and shall not suspend or reduce
required installment payments. All prepayments, after
deduction of accrued interest and prepayment premium,
shall be applied to reduce the principal balance of this
Note.
This Note constitutes an issue in the total
• authorized face amount of $1,000,000. This Note is issued
by the City pursuant to the authority granted by Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended (the Act), for the
purpose of providing funds to be loaned by the City to the
Partnership pursuant to the Loan Agreement to pay a portion
of the costs of the acquisition and construction of a
Project, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.02,
Subdivision la, consisting of certain real estate and
improvements thereon, and paying necessary expenses inciden-
tal thereto, such funds to be loaned by the City to the
Partnership pursuant to a Resolution adopted by the
governing body of the City on , 1980 (the
Resolution) and the Loan Agreement, thereby assisting
activities in the public interest and for the public wel-
fare of the City. This Note is secured by a Pledge Agree-
ment of even date herewith (the Pledge Agreement) between
the City and the Holder, a Mortgage and Security Agreement
of even date herewith (the Mortgage) given by the Partnership
in favor of the Holder and an Assignment of Leases and Rents
of even date herewith (the Assignment) given by the
Partnership in favor of the Holder.
As provided in the Resolution and subject to
certain limitations set forth therein, the City will cause
, to be kept at the office of the City Clerk - Administrator a
Note Register in which, subject to such reasonable
regulations as it may prescribe, the City shall provide
for the registration or transfer of ownership of this
Note. This Note is transferable upon the books of the
City at the office of the City Clerk- Administrator, by the
Holder hereof in person or by its attorney duly authorized
in writing, upon surrender hereof together with a written
instrument of transfer satisfactory to the City
Clerk- Administrator, duly executed by the Holder or its
duly authorized attorney. Upon such transfer the City
Clerk - Administrator will note the date of registration and
the name and address fo the new Holder upon the books of
the City and in the registration blank appearing below.
Alternatively, the City will at the request of the Holder
issue new notes in an aggregate principal amount equal to
the unpaid principal balance of this Note, and of like
tenor except as to number, principal amount and the amount
of the monthly installments payable thereunder, and
registered in the name of the registered Holder or such
• -8-
transferee as may be designated by the Holder. The City
may deem and treat the person in whose name this Note is
last registered upon the books of the City with such
registration noted on the Note as the absolute owner
hereof, whether or not overdue, for the purpose of
receiving payment of or on account of the principal
balance, redemption price or interest and for all other
purposes, and all such payments so made to the Holder or
upon its order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and
discharge the liability upon this Note to the extent of
the sum or sums so paid, and the City shall not be
affected by any notice to the contrary.
All of the agreements, conditions, covenants,
provisions and stipulations contained in the Resolution,
the Loan Agreement and the Pledge Agreement are hereby
made a part of this Note to the same extent and with the
same force and effect as if they were fully set forth
herein. If the City should fail to make any monthly
installment of interest or principal and interest when
due, which failure shall continue for five (5) days, or if
an Event of Default occurs under the Loan Agreement, the
Mortgage or the Assignment, then the Holder may at its
right and option, by written notice to the City and the
Partnership, declare immediately due and payable the
principal balance of this Note and interest accrued
thereon to the date of declaration of such default,
together with any attorney's fees incurred by the Holder
in collecting or enforcing payment of interest or
principal of this Note, without notice to or consent of
any party.
This Note shall not be payable from nor charged
upon any funds of the City other than the revenue under
the Loan Agreement pledged to the payment thereof, nor
shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. No
Holder of this Note shall ever have the right to compel
any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay this
Note or the interest or premium thereon, nor to enforce
payment thereof against any property of the City except
the revenue under the Loan Agreement pledged to the
payment thereof. This Note shall not constitute a charge,
lien, or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any
property of the City, except the revenue under the Loan
Agreement pledged to the payment thereof. This Note,
including interest and any premium thereon, is payable
solely from the revenue under the Loan Agreement pledged
to the payment thereon. This Note shall not constitute a
debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional
or statutory limitation. However, nothing contained in
-9-
this paragraph shall impair the rights of the Holder of
this Note to enforce covenants made for the security
thereof as provided under the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Section 474.11.
The Holder shall not be deemed, by any act of
omission or commission, to have waived any of its rights
or remedies hereunder unless such waiver is in writing and
signed by the Holder and then only to the extent
specifically set forth in the writing. A waiver with
reference to one event shall not be construed as
continuing or as a bar to or waiver of any right or remedy
as to a subsequent event.
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all
conditions, acts and things required to exist, happen, and
be performed precedent to or in the issuance of this Note
do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular
and due form as required by law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Note
to be duly executed by its duly authorized officers and
its corporate seal affixed all as of the day
of , 1980.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
By
Mayor
(SEAL)
Attest:
City Clerk - Administrator
-10-
PROVISIONS AS TO REGISTRATION
The ownership of the unpaid principal balance of
this Note and the interest accruing thereon is registered
on the books of the City of Shakopee in the name of the
registered holder last noted below.
•
Signature of
Date of Name and Address of City Clerk -
Registration Registered Holder Administrator
•
-11-
5.02. Note Terms. The Note shall be designated
the Commercial Development Revenue Note (Valley Industrial
Center I Project) (John Brooks Hauser, Lessee), and shall:
(a) be dated as of the date of delivery thereof
to the Lender;
(b) be in the total principal amount of
$1,000,000;
(c) bear interest on the unpaid principal.
balance advanced from time to time from date of issue
until paid or discharged as herein provided at the
rate of nine and three - quarters percent (9 -3/4 %) per
annum, except that in the event the interest on the
Note becomes subject to federal or state income
taxation pursuant to a "Determination of Taxability"
as defined in the Loan Agreement, the interest rate on
the Note shall be increased to eleven and
three- quarters percent (11 -3/4 %) per annum from .the
Date of Taxability, as defined in the Loan Agreement,
• all as provided in the Form of Note contained in
Section 5.01 hereof;
(d) be payable in installments on the first day
of each month as follows:
(1) on the first day of the month following
the date of delivery of the Note, an amount equal
to interest accrued to that date on the principal
balance of the Note;
(2) commencing on the first day of the
month next following the delivery of the Note,
and on the first day of each month thereafter,
principal and interest on the Note shall be
payable in 180 consecutive monthly payments
consisting of one hundred seventy nine
consecutive equal monthly payments of Eight
Thousand Five Hundred Ninety -Two Dollars
($8,592.00), and a final payment on the
first day of the one hundred eightieth
month following the payment of interest
only made under (1) above, of all princi-
pal and interest on the Note.
(e) be payable as to both principal and interest
to the registered Holder thereof at the principal
office of the Holder for the account of the City;
(f) be subject to the rights of the Holder to
call the Note for prepayment upon the occurrence of
certain events, as set forth in the Form of Note
following Section 5.01 hereof;
-12-
g P
•
•
(g) be subject to prepayment at the times,
upon the conditions and at the prices as provided
in the Form of Note following Section 5.01 hereof.
•
5.03 Execution. The Note shall be executed on
behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the
City Clerk- Administrator, and shall be sealed with its
corporate seal. In case any officer whose signature shall
appear on the Note shall cease to be such officer before
the delivery thereof, such signature shall nevertheless be
valid and sufficient for all purposes.
5.04. Mutilated, Lost and Destroyed Note. In
case the Note shall become mutilated or be destroyed or
lost, the City shall cause to be executed and delivered a
new Note of like outstanding principal amount and tenor in
exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of the
mutilated Note, or in lieu of and in substitution for such
Note destroyed or lost, upon the Holder's paying the
reasonable expenses and charges of the City in connection
therewith, and in case the Note is destroyed or lost, its
filing with the City evidence satisfactory to it.
5.05. Registration of Transfer. The City will
cause to be kept at the office of the City
Clerk- Administrator a Note Register in which, subject to
such reasonable regulations as it may prescribe, the City
shall provide for the registration or transfer of
ownership of the Note. The Note shall be transferable
upon the books of the City by the Holder thereof in person
or by its attorney duly authorized in writing, upon
surrender of the Note together with a written instrument
of transfer satisfactory to the City Clerk- Administrator,
duly executed by the Holder or its duly authorized
attorney. Upon such transfer the City Clerk shall note
the date of registration and the name and address of th
new Holder on the books of the City and in the
registration blank appearing on the Note. Alternatively,
the City shall, at the request and expense of the Holder,
issue new notes, in aggregate outstanding principal amount
equal to that of the Note surrendered, and of like tenor
except as to number, principal amount and the amount of
the monthly installments payable thereunder, and
registered in the name of the Holder or such transferee as
may be designated by the Holder. The City may deem and
treat the person in whose name each Note is last
registered upon the books of the City with such
registration noted on the Note as the absolute owner
thereof, whether or not overdue, for the purpose of
receiving payment of or on account of the principal
-13-
balance, prepayment price or interest and for all other
purposes, and all such payments so made to the Holder or
upon its order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and
discharge the liability upon this Note to the extent of
the sum or sums so paid, and the City shall not be
affected by any notice to the contrary.
5.06. Delivery and Use of Proceeds. Prior to
delivery of the Note, the documents referred to below
shall be completed and executed in form and substance as
approved by the City Attorney. The City shall execute and
deliver to the Lender the Note in the total principal
amount of up to $1,000,000, together with the following:
(a) a duly certified copy of this Resolution;
(b) original, executed counterparts of the Loan
Agreement, Financing Statement and the Pledge
Agreement; and
(c) such closing certificates, opinions and
related documents as are required by bond counsel.
Upon delivery of the Note and the above items to
the Lender, the Lender shall, on behalf of the City,
disburse to the Partnership the proceeds of the Note in
reimbursement of Project Costs pursuant to 'the provisions
of the Loan greement, and the proceeds so disbursed shall
be deemed to have been disbursed for the benefit of the
City. The Lender and the Partnership shall provide the
City with a full accounting of all funds disbursed for
Project Costs.
Section 6. Limitations of the City's
Obligations. Notwithstanding anything contained in the
Note, the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement, or any
other documents referred to in Section 3.03, the Note
shall not be payable from nor charged upon any funds of
the City other than the revenue under the Loan Agreement
pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be
subject to any liability thereon. No Holder or Holders of
the Note shall ever have the right to compel ° exercise
of the taxing power of the City to pay the Note or the
interest or any premium thereon, nor to enforce payment
thereof against any property of the City other than the
revenue under the Loan Agreement pledged for the payment
thereof. The Note shall not constitute a charge, lien, or
encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the
• City. The Note, including interest and premium, if any,
thereon, is payable solely from the revenue under the Loan
-14-
.Sz,--
Agreement pledged to the payment therof. The Note shall
not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of
any constitutional or statutory limitation. However,
nothing contained in this Section 6 shall impair the
rights of the Holder or Holders of the Note to enforce
covenants made for the security thereof, as provided under
the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.11.
Section 7. Registration and Certification of
Proceedings.
7.01 Registration. The City Clerk - Administrator
is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy
of this resolution with the County Auditor of Scott
County, together with such other information as he shall
require, and to obtain from the County Auditor a
certificate that the Note has been entered in his bond
register as required by law.
7.02. Certification of Proceedings. The
officers of the City and the County Auditor of Scott
County are directed to prepare and furnish to the Lender,
and to the attorneys rendering an opinion as to the
legality of the issuance of the Note, certified copies of
all proceedings and records of the City, and such other
affidavits, certificates and information as may be
required to show the facts relating to the legality of the
Note as the same appears from the books and records under
their custody and control or as otherwise known to them,
and all such certified copies, certificates and
affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be
deemed representatives of the City as to the facts stated
therein.
Adopted: , 1980.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk - Administrator
Approved as to form this
day of , 1980.
City Attorney
-15-
Y •S �
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing
resolution was duly seconded by Member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and
adopted.
-16-
r.
9cu
MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: J & B Enterprises, Industrial Revenue Bonds
DATE: February 4, 1080
In accordance with the recommendations made by our Bond
Consultant, it is my recommendation that prior to granting preliminary
approval for Industrial Revenue Bonds for J & B Enterprises, that
the following be received:
1. An underwriter acceptable to the City of Shakopee must be
selected and a statement from the underwriter must be received
indicating that the project is feasible.
2. Audited financial statements are received or the underwriter
certifies that :the purchaser of the mortgage or notes will not require
audited financial statements of Mastercraft or J & B Enterprises.
3. Dorsey Law Firm approves the proceedings to date and prepares
the preliminary resolution and supporting documentation..
4. Projected financial statement for Mastercraft up to May 1,
1980 be submitted.
S. Documentation is provided that on the basis of reasonable
projections, partnership and or corporate revenues will be available
for the timely payment of the notes.
•
6. List of potential purchasers of notes is identified and
approved by the City. The City will review, based on the experience
of those purchasers, in making comparable investment decisions. A
private placement to institutional investors is required.
Before a resolution granting final approval is adopted, the
following will be required:
1. An appraisal be submitted which indicates that the value of
the mortgaged property will be al least equal in value to 90% of the
mortgage notes.
2. Identity of purchaser be submitted to the City for approval.
3. Appropriate legal documentation be prepared by the Dorsey Firm.
DSR /jsc
MEMO TO: Mayor &City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: J & B Enterprises, Industrial Revenue Bonds
DATE: February 4, 1980
General information about J & B Enterprises includes the following:
1. J & B Enterprises is a partnership who will build a building
for Mastercraft Dump Bodies Inc. who are now located in Savage.
2. They currently employ 20 people in Savage and expect to
. employ 30 to 35 in Shakopee.
3. They expect to build the building in April of 1980 and
complete it in six months.
• 4. The request is for $950,000.00.
The location of the project is in the platted, watered and sewered
industrial park.
The project is in the Shakopee School District.
Recommendation:
Public hearing be held and staff requested to prepare the •
' appropriate preliminary resolution for Council approval after the
receipt of'the.information itemized on the attached memo.
DSR /jsc
•
•
Qi
•
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
APPLICATION'FOR INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS
Date: January 14, 1980
Applicant Name: J & B Enterprises
Address: 12420 Glendale Drive, Savage, Minnesota
Phone: 894 -7720, 927 -8615
Location of Proposed Project (address and legal description): Valley
Industrial Blvd. So., Lot 1, Block 1, Valley Park 5th Addition
1. Specific Proposed use of the facility.
The proposed facility will be used by Mastercraft Dump Bodies, Inc.
for the manufacture, repair and sales of truck dump bodies and
. truck equipment.
2. A list of all of their facilities owned or operated by the applicant.
J & B Enterprises does not presently own or operate any other facilities.
However, the lessee of the proposed facility, Mastercraft Dump Bodies,
Inc., currently operates a facility at 7213 West 128th Street, Savage,
Minnesota.
3. How many new people will be employed in Shakopee as a direct result of
this project?
Mastercraft Dump Bodies, Inc. currently employs 20 people. It is
. expected that this company will employ 30 -35 people after the facility
is completed.
4. What is the proposed date for start of construction? Completion of
construction?
' Construction is expected to commence on April 1, 1980 and will be
completed in approximately six months.
•
5. The estimated cost of the facility classified by:
a) Building construction 700',000
b) Furnishings or non -fixed equipment. 50,000
c) Land acquisition 115,000 •
•
Tq
d) Property development.
e) Professional fees.
1) Architectural engineering 10,000
2) Legal 20,000
3) Fiscal 5,000
f) Other (detail)
Developer fee 50,000
950,000
•
6. Applicant's legal interest in the land.
J & B Enterprises will own the land in fee simple.
7. Audited financial statements of the corporation for the immediate past
three years.
Although the applicant is J & B Enterprises, the principal lessee of
the facility will be Mastercraft Dump Bodies, Inc. Income tax
returns for the corporation's first two fiscal years ending April 30,
1976 and April 30, 1977 are attached as Exhibits A -1 and A -2.
Financial statements for the fiscal years ending April 30, 1978 and
1979, together with a statement reflecting operation for the first
two quarters of the current fiscal year are attached as Exhibits A -3,
A -4, and A -5, respectively.
8. A description of the corporation, including a resume of owners if privately
held,•or a resume of major officers and the board of directors of publicly
held corporations.
J & B Enterprises is a General Partnership engaged in the business of
ownership, management and leasing of real estate. The parties in
J & B Enterprises are James Aamodt and Bernard Mittlesteadt.
Mr. Aamodt is currently the President of Mastercraft Dump Bodies, Inc. and
McNeilius Construction Trucks, Inc. Both companies are engaged in the
manufacture, repair and sale of truck equipment. Prior to his present
position, Mr. Aamodt was truck sales manager for Towns Edge Ford from 1971 -
1979 and truck sales manager for Shakopee Ford from 1968 - 1971.
Mr. Mittlesteadt is President of Orr - Schelen - Mayeron and Associates, Inc.
and Senior Vice President for Kidde Consultants. These companies provide
engineering services to government, educational facilities, medical
facilities, penal institutions, industry and private sectors.
Mr. Mittelsteadt is a licensed professional engineer and has directed
• preliminary studies, feasibility studies, field investigations, cost
estimate preparation, final plan preparation and construction supervision
for various projects.
The lessee of the proposed facility is Mastercraft Dump Bodies, Inc.
•
t /
which is a Minnesota corporation presently doing business in Savage.
Mastercraft manufactures; repairs, and sells truck dump bodies and
truck equipment. Although Mastercraft's primary market is the upper
midwest,'it sells custom equipment to companies nationwide. Master -
craft is wholly owned by Mr. Aamodt. Besides Mr. Aamodt, the other
major officer of Mastercraft is John Luce. Mr. Luce has been the
general manager of Mastercraft for one year. Prior to his present
position, Mr. Luce was Assistant Vice President in the commercial
division for First Edina National Bank from 1976 - 1979 and was
involved in interim construction loans, commercial real estate
mortgages,' seasonal lines of credit, term loans and revolving lines
for working capital. Mr. Luce was also Vice President for American
State Bank in Bloomington from 1974 - 1976.
9. If interim construction financing is required, a commitment for such
financing from a reputable lender.
Interim construction financing is not expected to be required.
10. A statement as to the final financing vehicle as to whether the instrument
should be bonds, mortgage revenue notes, or unsecured debt.
•
Permanent financing of the proposed project will be provided by the
.. sale of mortgage revenue notes. .
11. Method of payment to the City of all public cost.
J & B Enterprises will reimburse the City for any costs incurred.
12. The resume of the underwriters including a listing of five other comparable
offerings which have been placed with that underwriter.
At this time, negotiations are underway with Juran & Moody, Inc. to
underwrite the sale of the Industrial Revenue Bonds. A resume of
this company and a list of offerings are attached as Exhibit B.
13. A listing of all•other corporate debt by amount, date of obligation,
annual required payments, obligee, and type of security.
J & B Enterprises currently has no corporate debt. The corporate debt
of Mastercraft Dump Bodies, Inc. is set forth on Exhibit C.
•
omas G/Stef s
•
Attorney for JI B Enterprises
•
January 14, 1980
Date)
I „',1.;,.:( ;,MILLI 6 7 41 --/
J` t.,.\• • 1 , , ,c.k-,c4, EXHIBIT A -3
UNAV! LTEI)
Assets Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity
Current Assets Current Liabilities It
Cash it \v,o;ta.as Accounts payable 91,335
Accounts Receivable - trade tt(„1gK.20 Commissions payable
Accounts Receivable lease contracts q,ou0.oc Notes payable - current ' tti,5ui
Less: Unearned interest revenue < S,g45.19 ? Contracts payable - Floor Plan tia,
Accounts Receivable - other tu,2s2.51 Due Officers g
Inventory - raw materials - 6 6y 'd,$q Payroll taxes payable t,11
Inventory - work in process , 0i000 . 0 0 Accrued payroll 3,.D
Inventory - finished goods t 9g ,yo1 Sales tax payable_ 41.
Prepaid expenses 6cit.6t Federal excise tax payable 'S,1o'
. Total Current Assets l,it,964.51 Interest payable 1,4S
. Other accrued payable %,,,.
Customer Deposits -ts
Plant, Property & Equipment Reserve for income taxes 1 t)ol
Office furniture & equipment 5, 1. t Income taxes payable C q
Machinery & equipment ttt,ss -j -i Contracts payable - Autos & Truck%
Leasehold improvements 1A, Reserve for Workman's Comp. 2,$9
Autos & trucks 1 1 , ‘ , 4 1 . 1 - 1 Deferred Income-Diff. Reserve t,1.3
isQ,-,tc.o/
Less: allowance for depreciation 6 , 9 G'1 .o 4 Total Current ,Liabilities r3‘4, vi
Total Plant, Property
& Equipment 4t,152.44 Long -term Debt
Notes Payable -net of current 2.1,16
Contracts payable - Autos &
Other Assets Trucks -net of current q,3
Organization costs • 1.6e.44. Total Long -term Debt , 323tt
Deferred Interest 1.,917..g4
Differential Reserve • 1,214,ty •
Escrow Account - Workman's Comp. y 34%.31_ Shareholders' Equity .
Accounts Receivable -lease contracts 't,6,00o.00 Capital stock t,00
Less: Unearned interest revenue < %0,119.61 ? Paid in capital
Total Other Assets 34,053.2 Retained earnings - sn,i?-c
Net year -to -date income to6,42'
Total Shareholders'
Equity 2`tS,
Total Liabilities &
Total Assets 13. ncti , -In S. (,9 Shareholders' Equity is .2211L22
•
i
•
`
_ ' �7 61�
/
.
°
. �
. ��otozoraft �nuuo.Bodiea» Inc.
' ' --------------- --�
----- � •
_______.______� ______________�oot�l�Operating Statement ���c���
~__._
�
_--__-__-�
'-_-___'__-_
=== �=='=~~------ -�
. =
3 e ji lr i S an _ .i_ ovaNc_el____. __. _ _ _ . I RI H -
. .......i .. .
, ,. st. f e_p__ _l_ 1_ _ _ _ _ _ IN 11101111 lippro .1
1 atE. II
i G o 2 . . n : r i t L _ . _ _,..._ .._ ,. ___.: i iii I 110 Mg _
. 1---- 0, 14- I T i ----- ,i,-,:In-1,-)--1---L--------- : -- ir ralimp
---_-__1,-.. , 1.11. _
,-,-_, ,I 1 ti _Opp ie .1___ ___ ._. __ . _ ____ ___ _ __.i 9 Li 1. 4 _1__ 5._ i, I 111 ll I
1 .1-;JA-i-LACsa _ lig_ Mg _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____— _ . 2_ 2, ( 2- — 1 s I I III
r x l 1 -. i
1
-- I ---: -- --- • ------------ -----1-- I maul limn"
_4,15 1- t C. 4° — ei 5 i
_ c., ,- .L1-.,,_ ._: - ,F, 1 ,,,I, -, ;1 -,-;.- — ---, 0 o - mil 1 EN
J
ri
..., .,,,,,e___±.._-___..____._____________.___ , ,„
_. ________ ....__ lir _ ,, )
r .
,__
_. 1 ,_.______.______._.._,._.. _.__ i i___ ___ A LI A 1 _
- -- -,_ -,- - i-,-._-:1 - It - - - ' - — - — - - I IIIIIIIIIII -
I 11 i 1 I 1 -- rt i i 1 i ; i 'I; i ii i I 1 1 H H i 1 1 'ii 1: , i' 1 - i- i- 1 - tr-' - 74.-i-i I I 1 -. ''--/ .
al W
•
_ • Mastercraf L. Dump Bodies � Inc . - - -- .
__ _Cost of Sales
• Unaudited_
(, •..ko \oor 1t L 1( i
1
irch - 7, � ks
d: ie� _ yg tt CQo --�q -- _ ._ 3 2 3 3 o 6R _ 4 3 9 y v; - _ 1 -
!_ Subco ra t_- .Steel . _-• - .. • . ... ___ ._. ..._ - -- - -- - - — - -
I ._ 1-1.- _ �a1rit - -- - 5 Li_ i II! , '1 I iI P „a — sls,6 — -
0 Itsi el S ace$. D ' I ect __. - -. - - - - - - — - -- -- -
,. ' Direc Ibor -- -- __ _ __ -- __..._. .' Z�y G os - Ut: ' R - -- ._. 1 3? `(• 0 K t __ -- 1 - I Fac i I
+ � Ov ea • - . _... . _._ _ . - . — i
') Irive o. I Ch -- - - - — -- 3036►. ly < 43_4 ►6 7 j
IIII
2 C■ St f d _S..ld._ .. — -- — 111 2 1-, C m 2 s2
_ — 1 — — —
.— 1
1- - -- - --. - - - - -
i : i I _ J - _ . i ' _ -_ __. _ _ _ _ _ _ __ .__ _ _ _ _ - I __ _ _ _ _—._ _ __ I i _.___ T __ —_� _ _ __ _ _i_ �.__
1 pi
I is
•
I 11
- _ . _ . - • ._ • *• _ .. i • t • - ... . _ . . . — _ _ _ . _ _ _ ....... _ .
- - - I . 1_ _ _ --.__._.. .... -- - - • - - - - -- • . ; - -- - - - - •- - - - - -- -.
{ S � �
- 4 I i i I I 1 I 1 i V i 1 i I i I i. i! i i + I 1 � �+ 1 � I 1 1
' ' 4� ��'
. ` !
"
8astorcr./[L Dump Uodios, Inc.
) -
- '________ _._ _ . _ __________ _____FaotoryDvcrbnad_
_�____ _ _.__.__________________ �_____ oau�����
~.--- - _-_---- ....... '_-----_-_. -__---' -' -__-__ -
- y --_- '
/ /
. �� '��' �«"` -�" • �
/ - '�--' ------''-- � -- ----- -' -- ^- ------ -- '|
' `p` r» '
___ - ���� « � __-
i I Iridiroc: Labe ... . . _ . . __. _. _ ___ _ _ __ 7 9 3 o 37 _ _1- , (. 1- It , I_
| �
'1 -
4 . Iri.Sul•ancl. .....v1;o an s. p p - - 1 - - - - - --- -- - .. -- .- - - c,ci i . a
In' Equipn _ e t 1 i 1 -- r, 4 t ' 9 4 rso
i ____a_ Fie4ht.i_ _ _ __. 1 1 I _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ ____ :z. 4 99 _ ■ no 1 I
• ti _11_ P rmas k.?-4tP 1._ _ _ . _ _ _ __ _ ____ __. _ _ _ __. . 3 .4 4 4 4 ---t-
[ — — -
1 . __ . F. _ ,
_ i i __ .
_ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. 4 .' , , .
_' _._. Mastercraft Dump.Bodies,- .Inc..__.. -__-__ Selling,. General and. Administrative Expenses
� - - - ...- -- - - - - -- --- - - - -- - Unaudited --
J 1 Salara 0 l e's - 0 fi ers _ _ _ _ _ _I
S leNles �, e - - - .1' . y24syu 2G 42596 - - - - - --
__ ;. Adv ' _ _ z v G _ _ ... - . 2.-1 - - _,
i -I . Bad be — -- - -- -- - -- — -- - - -- -- — — - — - _
I il1
} •, 1 C o1
% , Bank Iha xg e ,� _,�
Co mni ssi d n s .,� I
2. s i 3 4 s 6 a 4 59 --
Li %_ Contri ns - � I _ . - - - _ - . _ - •- .- _ __-- - - - - z s o - - -
K ' pr jc at h- o ffi� e n, _& quip. - - - - - -, 0 00 _ _ y z o o O
_ -• - - • -
i, e s t S;cn i i P on --- i .---- - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - -
} �� De
Legal, c aunt 1I I c 9 5 o u - 9 t 2 1 4O
t o 1 I -Mi Gel ane •usE-pe `e - - - — �- ---- ___ -31 ,, —_ �4,2gsI— — — --
I i I I -- —
. �, Of'ic Su .1• -s 1 -- - - - ... - - - -, , 32 - % s o, 61- - -
I• 0
13 1 r ani ati4n _ _ - -_• - ---- --- - - -- - 4 - 44 . --- -- 5 3 6Y I '- -
' 1 3 S ou t, 0 00
I
.4 Ai_ Po t ag-- .- I -, - -- - - _- _ - - -- - -
/ t: TetLep ne 1 1 I 400,- ►gz1aB ,,„
r. �rave� & to . inure t I _ _ s s , 11-1 - 4 y s 4 71
_ h 17 i Au � o & T kEx•ens= 3�9+i x44 — rivers Tr _F _ _ - -, - - _ _ _ 3 o s _ _ _ - I s 6 93
-
'1 211 ��� ��cc _� Z n n c _ • n lc -- - - - -- ---- �4 3 1u --- _ p.,
1
i _ l � 1 I ■■
4 w - -- -. 1 i I. ' - - - - -. •- - -- -- - - - -
.�. I \ 313 t q2o '_ -
Ph
/1
t L 1
41 .,, 11 --"T .
-
r J LD I :
_
._. ..— .. i - -- - ._ - - -- -- - -- - -
I 1
ftJL I I .. _ _.. . . . _. _ • ... -- - - - - - - - -- -
i
, , , . 1 , , 1 . /, 1 t i 1 . 1 I I-
SPRINGSTED m et �:�y
INCORPORATED E
PUBLIC FINANCE JAN3 1980
ADVISORS
CITY OF SHAKOPE
24 January 1980
Mr. Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
City of Shakopee
Shakopee, MN 55379
Re: Industrial Revenue Bond Issue for
J & B Enterprises
Dear Mr. Reeder:
We have reviewed the application of J & B Enterprises for compliance
with your requirements for issues of this kind and wish to bring the
following apparent non - compliance items to your attention:
(1) All financial documents submitted with the application are
unaudited.
(2) All financial documents submitted relate only to Mastercraft
Dump Bodies, Inc. No financial documents were provided for
J & B Enterprises, the proposed lessee of the facility.
(3) There is no underwriter commitment by the applicant, and no
findings by an underwriter that in the opinion of the under-
writer the issue is marketable.
(4) While not specifically required by the City, we find no
reference to retention of Bond Counsel, and we find no reso-
lution of intent to issue the bonds, which resolution should be
submitted to you for consideration prior to the public hearing
on February 5th.
The application indicates the proposed use of mortgage revenue notes
and we assume the property as developed will be mortgaged as partial •
security for the notes. We have several questions which the the City may possible
wish to address to J & B Enterprises and /or Juran & Moody,
underwriter:
(1) What will be the value of the mortgaged property upon completion?
Will that value equal or exceed the total original value of
mortgage revenue note(s) to be issued by the City? What
evidence of value will be submitted to prospective purchasers
of the note(s)?
(2) What securit y will be pledged to payment of the note(s) by
J & B Enterprises?
800 Osborn Building, Saint Paul, Minneso 55102 (612) 222 -4241
Mr. Douglas S. Reeder
24 January 1980
Page 2
(3) Will the new facility erve to significantly increase net
revenues of Mastercraft?
Historical net revenues do not appear sufficient to cover
potential lease costs. Data submitted for the period covered
by the unauited statements net earnings
after adjustment for
Period Net Earnings
5/1/76 - 4/30/77 $ 18,152
5/1/77 - 4/30/78 (18,615)
5/1/78- 4/30/79 38,285
5/1/79- 10/30/79 206,923
it is our recommendation that before approval of this request the City
consider requiring the following information or actions:
(1) Selection by the applicant of an underwriter acceptable to
the City and the provision by that firm of assurance that the
note(s) is marketable.
(2) Audited financial statements are submitted, or the underwriter
certifies that the purchaser of the note(s) will not require
audited financial statements of Mastercraft and /or J & B
Enterprises.
(3) Bond Counsel acceptable to the City approves proceedings to
date and prepares the resolution of intent to issue which the
City Council will be asked to approve.
(4) Documentation is provided that the asis r a b le e
projections, partnership and/ corporate
available for the timely payment of note(s) amortization.
The list of potential purchasers is identified and approved by
(5)
the City, which approval should focus on the experience level
of those purchasers in making comparable investment decisions.
This recommendation is not meant, nor should it be considered, as a
finding of financial feasibility or infeasibility of the proposed project.
if we can;be of further assistance, please call us.
Very sincerely yours,
106,64
•
Robert D. Pulscher
First Senior Vice President
City MEMO TO: Cit Council and Mayor / b
FROM: Tim Keane, City Planner
RE: Dallas Herrgott, Conditional Use Permit
•
DATE: February 5, 1980
The following case was approved by the Planning Commission on
a 3 -1 vote at the January 24, 1980 meeting. It is before the Council
at this time on appeal.
The original staff recommendation to the Planning Commission was
to approve the-Conditional Use Permit for the storage of one
truck by the applicant. At the Planning Commission meeting, it
was clarified that the applicant wished to store and maintain
two trucks out of this site.
Staff concerns noted in the considerations are the basis for the
present recommendations.
TK;nae
•
•
I
DATE: February 5, 1980
CASE: C.U.P. 239
APPLICANT: Dallas F. Herrgott
LOCATION: 2540 Marschall Road
ZONING /LAND USE: R -1, Rural Residential /Single Family Residential
AREA: 10 acres
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: 11.25, 11.05 Subd. 3 C.6., 11.04 Subd. 6,
11.05 Subd 10
FINDINGS REQUIRED: Conditional Use Permit 11.04 Subd. 6, Home
Occupation 11.05 Subd. 10
PUBLIC HEARING
DECISION BY CITY COUNCIL
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit in order to conduct a home occupation in an R -1 zone.
The applicant plans to construct a 40'x60' pole barn for the
storage and maintenance of two semi - tractor trailers and operate
these trucks out of this site.
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY:
Surrounding Land Uses: North- R -1, Rural Residential /Single Family
home on 10 acre parcel
South- R -1, Rural Residential /Timber Trails
Subdivision
East- R -1, Rural Residential /Single Family
residential, under cultivation
West -R -1, Rural Residential /Under Cultivation
Land Use Plan: Low density, rural residential.
Sanitary Sewer: None, on site disposal.
CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The parcel was originally 10 acres in size. The applicant
still owns the 10 acres, but has split off two acres in the
center of the parcel. It is on this center two acres that
the applicant has built his house and proposes to store the
trucks.
2. A home occupation is a Conditional Use in an R -1 zone.
3. County Road 17 is a minor arterial with a 55 MPH speed limit.
' 4. Staff feels that the proposed use has a number of potential
effects that would encroach on the residential character of
the area. These include:
- Exterior storage of trucks and parts
- Noise from trucks, repair operations and equipment.
Case C.U.P. 239
February 5, 1980
Page 2
5. Staff is also concerned with the potential safety hazard
created with slow moving semi - trucks turning out onto
County Road 17 with limited visibility to the south.
There is a curve and downhill grade 1/4 mile to the south
of the driveway of the proposed home occupation. Under
normal daylight driving conditions, there is approximately
1200' visibility from the curve to the driveway. The
State Department of Transportation recommends a safe stopping
distance of feet at 55 MPH under normal driving
conditions. The 1200' is adequate but not ideal.
6. Section 11.05 subd. 3c. 6 of the Code states that: off -
street parking facilities accessory to residential use
shall be utilized solely for the parking of passenger
automobiles, except that for each dwelling unit one truck
not in excess of 9000 pounds rated capacity may be parked
by the occupant within a structure.
7. Staff feels that a truck storage and repair operation is not
a business appropriate to a residential area and should be
restricted to the proper zones.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends denial of the' Conditional Use Permit for a
home occupation based on the lack of the findings for a Conditional
Use Permit that:
#1. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use
and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity
for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially
diminish and impair property values within the immediate
vicinity.
#7. The use is consistent with the purposes of the zoning code
andsthe purposes of the zoning district in which the
applicant intends to locate the proposed use.
#9. The use will not cause traffic hazard or congestion.
.,..1 . . . ., •
:'' t� EVE. '' i i i li L U H1 W 1 • I
p \ �+�.� ' 1 i i s A ST SHAKQP�E v R \
f x
. NORTHERN ____
_ M ft _ KILLARI'
Ilt
_........._ ____________,
GAS ' ' ' • ( ot,AF;ANI I ., --'•-"--." .......... ----. .....•
• t . ' MILLS F
! •-.`
•
, i • 1 i .
13 1 18 17 _- - --- li
• I
T E ' ' y
--- __ - CO RI) 7 _ _ _ _ --
i .
• . n .
• r
I t - v _. _ _ _ . -... - - - - -- - - - --
�4
• 191 20. 1 s .
I '\ ex TIMBER
•AILS • -- -_,
•
!_ is • ,' �- -A 1 CO RD 76 I . . .
•. `? ' • 1.--\ / , 7'Dowd: take , •
fjf c / l --r \
. 1.-.,.. ( . 6.
\ .
1
`PETITIONER DATE
Z
1000. I! CASE NO. i , LOT LOCATION SCALE PG
S /EC 135
PETER C SCHV, r ;'(f CE.i
ALLX J SCHMI I `r i CD)
# .
I
U)
()
I Ga MMo N
•
. • - I S ~A - 5
l ` ;42 -- •
∎' 4. F I4oOhE i
•
sli ■• S/EC A.
t • 14 WE..RMERSK)RCHEN -T
I
X19 A C
380' ZO' B oa' - -r - i
\ i 1 / 1 .1 , ,
SE(skT r
j I I
. . .... : i , -. i 5
1
/:
I Z 00
T k fl I x ! -f
I p
, I> - J
-- - . ... ...
, 1_ ir. ck.._._,_ .
, . . - 4
,
' ) , 1 r
PETITIONE y DATE
2- rO e
240'
LCASE NO. ` LOT LOCATION ` SCALE PG
■
?/(
Subd. 6. Conditional Use Permit.
A. Criteria for G Use Permits. In grant-
ing a conditional use permit, the Planning Commission shall con-
sider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the occupants of surrounding lands.
Among other things, the Planning Commission shall make the fol-
lowing finds where applicable:
1. That the conditional use will not be in-
jurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immedi-
ate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substan-
tially diminish and impair property values within the immediate
vicinity.
2. That the establishment of the conditional
use will not impede the normal and orderly development and im-
provement of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in
the area. •
3. That adequate utilities, access roads,
drainage, and other necessary facilities have been or are being
provided.
4. That adequate measures have been or will
be taken to provide sufficient off - street parking and loading
space to serve'the proposed use.
5. That adequate measures have been or will
be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise
and vibration, so that none of these will constitute a nuisance,
and to control lighted signs and other lights in such a manner
• that no disturbance to neighboring properties will result.
6. The use, in the opinion of the Council, •
is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the
existing land use.
7. The use is consistent with the purposes
of the zoning code and the purposes of the zoning district in
which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use.
8. The use is not in conflict with the Com-
prehensive Plan of the City.
9. The use will not cause traffic hazard or
congestion.
10. axisting businesses nearby will not be
adversely affected because of curtailment of customer trade
brought about by intrusion of noise, glare or general unsightli-
ness.
11. The developer shall submit a time sched-
ule for completion of the project.
12. The developer shall provide proof of own-
ership of the property to the Administrator.
B. Additional Conditions.
•
1. In permitting a new conditional use or
the alteration of an existing conditional use, the Planning Com-
mission may impose, in addition to the standards and requirements
expressly specified by this Chapter, additional conditions which
the Planning Commission considers necessary to protect the best
interest of the surrounding area or the community as a whole.
' -283-
These conditions may include, but are not limited to, the follow-
ing: ( Increasing the required lot size or
yard dimension.
(b) Limiting the height, size, or loca-
tion of buildings.
(c) Controlling the location and number
of vehicle access points.
(d) Increasing the street width.
(e) Increasing the number of required
off - street parking spaces.
(f) Limiting the number, size, location
or lighting of signs.
(g) Requiring diking, fencing, screen
ing, landscaping, or other facilities to protect adjacent or
nearby property.
(h) Designated sites for open spaces.
(i) Requiring the execution of a devel-
oper's agreement and providing financial guarantee of cash de-
posit, certified check or performance bond to insure compliance
with conditional use permit provisions.
2. Any change involving structural altera-
tions, enlargement, intensification of use, or similar change not
specifically permitted by the conditional use permit'issued shall
apply as if a new permit were being issued. The Administrator
shall maintain a record of all conditional use permits issued in-
cluding information on the use, location, and conditions imposed
by the Planning Commission; time limits, review dates, and such
other information as may be appropriate.
•
C. Procedure.
1. The person applying for a conditional use
permit shall fill out and submit to the Administrator a condi-
tional use application form plus fee. At the time of submission
of the permit, the' Administrator may request the developer to de-
posit up•to $1,000.00 held in a special developer's escrow ac-
count and shall be credited to the said developer. Engineering
planning, administrative and legal expenses incurred by the City
shall be paid by the developer. The administering of the escrow
accounts shall follow Section 12.03, Subdivision 3, of the Subdi-
vision Regulations.
2. A site plan must be attached at a scale
large enough for clarity showing the following information:
(a) Location and dimensions of: lot,
building, driveways, and off - street parking spaces.
(b) Distance between: building and
front, side, and rear lot lines; principal building and accessory
buildings; principal building and principal buildings on adjacent
lots.
(c) Location of: signs, easements, un-
derground utilities, septic tanks, tile fields, water wells, etc.
(d) Any additional information as may
reasonably be required by the Administrator and applicable Sec-
tions of the Zoning Chapter, including, but not limited to, the
-284-
permit which must be met for all dwelling units moved to a perma-
nent location in the City shall include the following:
A. The dwelling units must equal or exceed in
value the adjacent homes.
B. The owner must show proof of ownership of the
proposed location.
C. The dwelling unit must be compatible with
adjacent houses.
D. The dwelling unit must meet all requirements
of the Building Code within six (6) months after it is moved.
E. Must be a permitted or conditional use in the
Zoning District.
F. Structures other than dwelling units must meet
the following minimum standards:
1. Meet all requirements of the Building Code
within six (6) months after it is moved.
2. Be compatible with adjacent homes and
structures.
Subd. 10. Home Occupations. Any home occupation may
be permitted only as a conditional use if it complies with the
minimum requirements of this Subdivision.
A. The home occupation shall be carried on by a
member of the family in the dwelling unit with not more than one
employee who is not part of the family.
B. The home occupation shall be carried on wholly
within the principal or accessory structure.
C. Exterior displays or signs, except those per-
mitted by the Shakopee Sign Ordinance, exterior storage of ma-
terials except in AG or R -1 Districts, and exterior indication of
the home occupation or variations from the residential character
of the principal structure shall not be permitted.
D. Objectionable traffic noise, vibration, smoke,
dust, electrical disturbance, odors, heat, or glare or other con-
ditional uses which are objectionable to adjoining property own-
ers shall not be produced.
E. The home occupation shall not involve over-
the-counter sales except in AG or R -1 Districts.
• Source: Ordinance No. 31, Fourth Series
Effective Date: 10 -25 -79
(Sections 11.06 through 11.19, inclusive, reserved for fu-
ture expansion.)
-298-
P
:Proceedings of the Page -2-
.• Planning Commission January 10, 1980
City Eng. stated that the property owner would like to use this
land if they can get it diked.
City Admin. read a letter from the Department of Natural Resources
which stated that they would have no problem to granting this request.
Comm. Rockne voiced his concerns about the river affects on buildings
and properties in the immediate area should another piece of property
encroach on the river.
No action was required at this meeting.
Co.l.l.igan /R.ockne_move.d to._open the public hearingon the request for
a. Conditional Use Permit No. 239, fq "r - - _a_ . home` occupation to construct
a ole bariifor s torag - e - and maintenance of tractor- trailers. Motion
• carried unanimously. .
City Admin. stated that the Conditional Use Permit is being requested
for the pole barn to be located at 2540 Marschall Road. He further
stated that staff would recommend approval of the Conditional Use
Permit to be granted for the use of storage and maintenance of one
'IL tractor - trailer unit only.
4\ City Planner stated that staff'had received calls voicing opposition
to the granting of this Conditional Use Permit.
J/7-applicant. Actting_Chrmn. Perusich asked for comments from Mr. Dallas Herrgott ,
r
Mr. Herrgott stated that this was needed just so his vehicles would
(f start easier in the winter. This would be for two tractors and two
1\
trailers which.. would be his. He further stated he would employ no
outside help for this. .
• r Acting Chrmn. Perusich asked for comments from the audience.
i Jim Larson presented a petition to the Planning Commission containing
/ 29 signatures of people in the immediate area who were in opposition
! to the granting of this Conditional Use Permit. He also stated that
a business such as this should be placed in an Industrial Park,area
ii i ' and not in residential. He then listed the concerns as had been placed
on the petition by the residents:
d ti 1. Building would not meet the code requirements for R -1.
2. Property values would be impaired.
3. Development would be impaired.
4. This would create a traffic hazard on County Road 17.
9
Proceedings of the Page - -
Planning Commission January 10, 1980 .
s
.5. This would create excessive noise in a relatively quiet
1
residential area.
7 6. Granting of this Conditional Use Permit could produce potentially
undesirable chemical pollutants.
I 7.' Building could accommodate four tractor- trailer units so
i
they questioned how many more would be parked outside.
fi
t Joe McVey, Developer for Timber Trails, stated he felt approval of
this Conditional Use Permit would not be consistent in an R -1 zone.
Marlene Larson questioned if any traffic control study had been done
for this area. She asked if a study would be warranted by the County
since this is a county road. She further stated that if this would
be allowed, where then would home occupations stop?
'
k
City Admin. answered her concerns and also stated that home occupations
, are a conditional use in an R -1 zone so anyone could apply for a
'�{ Conditional Use Permit for a home occupation.
i
.\ George Muenchow stated he would be against any approval on this
\ \Conditional Use Permit because this would be "stretching the
of a home occupation.
./Tim Johnson stated his concern with safety measures and traffic
concerns on County Road 17. He stated that County Road 17 South
was too narrow for these type of rigs and the site distance would be
"s, very minimal for a slow moving rig pulling out on County Road 17.
Dennis Purell stated he could see no problem with approval of this
.1 Conditional Use Permit request and had checked out site allowances
l which he .considered be adequate.
6' Jim Wermerskirchen stated that what concerned him'the most was the
I excessive noise level of a business such as this and the low noise
1 level out in his area was a specific reason for buying there.
Harry Weinandt asked if legally Mr. Herrgott could park tractor -
J/.y trailers outside on his property, and questioned the building of the barn.
City Admin. stated that parking tractor- trailers outside a R -1 area
i f would be illegal. He further stated that building a pole barn of
40' x 66' would be allowed in an R-1 area but it is the business in
the structure that is in question.
Dennis Furtney'stated he is considering building a very large home
\\, out in this area but would question this if he would be next.to a
\\ tractor - trailer operation.
Bob Lisko stated the noise level and traffic hazard was of great
\\ concern to him.
t H. .
Proceedings of the Page -4-
Planning Commission January 10, 1980
Jim 'arson stated that if he had known there would be tractor - trailers
adjacent to his property, he would not have bought in-this area.
Joe McVey stated a developer must rely on the City to not allow uses
which would devalue property and/or developments.
Bill Devine stated that County Road 17 could get extremely dangerous
in the winter. He further stated that he could not see semi - trailers
using the hill on County Road 17 near Timber Trails.
Duane Purell4questioned if there wasn't some proposal on the county
level to upgrade County Road 17.
City Engineer replied that nobody working for the City of Shakc, pee
was aware of any such proposal. •
Jim Larson stated it would be a great injustice to allow a home
occupation such as this in an R -1 zone.
M arlene Larson stated that since this area is near the area being
/proposed for the regional; O'Dowd Lake Park, she questioned if this
would be an appropriate location for tractor - trailers in regard to
/ getting the O'Dowd Lake area designated as a regional park.
'' ` City Admin. read the guidelines which would have to be followed in
order for the Planning Commission to grant approval to this request.
!,Colligan /Koehnen moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried
`' unanimously.
Comm. Koehnen stated that according to the information the Planning
-° Commission had received, this request was for a "home occupation"
and yet Mr. Herrgott was making it sound like this request was just
g to allow small repair and maintenance work on his tractor - trailer
units alone. She asked Mr. Herrgott for clarification on what was
il
being requested by him and for what.
Mr. Herrgott replied that he-is an independent trucker and he would be
A; servicing and storing only:his own trucks.
Comm. Colligan stated that,he is very much against the approval of
this Conditional Use Permit due to what is in the area at this
time. He further stated he would be once again be against any form of
. precedent setting, such as this.
City A.dmin. stated that the written application does not describe in
detail what the applicant intends to do.
, - f)
'Proc of the • Page -5-
.' / Commission January 10, 1980
6
� .
E Colligan /Koehnen moved the denial of Conditional Use Permit Resolution
No. 239, a request for a home occupation to construct a pole barn
for storage and maintenance of tractor - trailers in an R -1 zone for
F the reason that it does not comply with one of the stipulations set
4f forth in the Shakopee City Code, Subdivision 6, Section A-2
if which states "establishment of the Conditional Use will not
impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surround -
, ing vacant property for uses predominant in the area ".
Roll Calls Ayes - Colligan, Koehnen
€'` Noes - Rockne, Perusich
°" Abstaining arschal� Motion failed due to a
g tie vote
Colligan moved that this request for a Conditional Use Permit be sent
to the City Council without a recommendation from the Planning Commission,
Motion died for lack of second.
;'` Rockne /Koehnen offered Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 239,
' and moved for its adoption with the following conditions:
// 1) Applicant does not store more than two semi tractor - trailer units
.,/ on the site.
4.
2) Said vehicles be stored under cover in proposed storage dwelling.
3) Said tractor- trailer be owned by applicant.
) Said vehicles be stored in an empty state; without load.
" o n carried__i(.i►ith Comm. Colligan voting "no" and Comm. Marschall
'abstaining. . . _ __ __ __r ,
City Admin. stated the decision made by the Planning Commission can
; be appealed within a seven -day time frame to the City Admin. If
this is done it then will come before the City Council, and all
',= notifications of the public hearing will once again be advertised and
' surrounding property owners would receive notification by mail.
Further discussion was held between the audience and the Planning
Commission.
Joe McVey questioned why public hearing notices had even been sent
out if the Planning Commission was not going to listen to the remarks
of the majority of the residents in the audience (29 opposed and 1 for
the granting of the Conditional Use Permit).
Comm. Koehnen stated that there appeared to be confusion on what had
, been acted on and what actually had been requested.
Comm. Colligan suggested that discussions cease and further discussion
k be taken to the City Council, if this is the wish of the residents.
MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Dog Catcher
DATE: January 31, 1980
The current arrangement with the dog catcher is that the City pays
a flat per month charge and additional charges for pounding and picking
up dead animals, $310.00 per month or $3,720 per year. In 1979 we
received revenues of $621.00 for dog licenses and $624.00 in fines.
The dog catching operation therefore costs the City approximately
$2,475 in 1979.
An alternative to that arrangement has been discussed with Mr.
McAllister and could involve no monthly fee, but a fee for services
actually performed. These fees would be as follows:
$25.00 per dog or cat picked up
7.00 to pick up and bury dead animals
10.00 to pick up and bury dead skunks
20.00 to deliver an animal to the University of Minnesota
for'rabies test
During 1979 he picked up a total of 138 dogs and an estimated
15 dead animals and an estimated 3 dogs were taken to the University
of Minnesota. I have attached a summary of 1979 for your information.
If this same trend continued ourtotal charges for 1980 would be
' as follows
$3,750 for dog or cat pickup ($25 each)
70 for pick up of dead animals ($7 each)
50 for pick up of dead skunks ($10 each)
60 to deliver dogs to University of Minnesota ($20 each)
$3,930 Total Cost
The 1980 budgeted amount for dog catching is $2;000 while the
1979 budget was $4,400. You will recall at budget time you asked that
the amount be reduced because of dissatisfaction with what we are getting
for the money spent. I believe the concept of paying on a per dog basis
is valid and I think we should try it to see how it works. It may or
may not increase the number of dogs picked up and 'therefore the cost
to the City. •
I have in addition explored the concept of entering into a joint
dog catching agreement with other Scott County communities and Scott
County who all use the same service. This will be explored for 1981
and hopefully some recommendations made by budget time in 1980.
C
•
Dog Catcher
January 31, 1980
Page -2-
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the fee schedule
recommended above for dog catching services for 1980.
1979 Dog Program
Dogs Picked Up Dogs Claimed Cost Revenue
January 15 3 $310 $60
February 9 3• 310 18
March 7 2 310 29
April 10 3 310 50
May 9 2 310 37
June 11 3 310 50
July - 15 5 . 310 90
August 12 4 310 98
September 14 4 310 86
October = 12 1 310 23
November 11 2 310 27
December 13' 3 310 56
138 35 $3,720 $624
•
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
RE: Police Civil Service Commission
DATE: January 29, 1980
The term of Stan Dircks on the Police Civil Service
Commission expires on February 1st. He needs to be
reappointed or replaced. He has indicated that he
would be willing to serve again but will have no ill
feelings if the City Council chooses to appoint someone
else.
DSR /jiw
•
•
9
V
MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Douglas S..Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Industrial Revenue Bonds
•
DATE: February 4, 1980
When the City Council established the procedure for the
issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds, the staff recommended an
upper limit of 25% of the assessed valuation for the issuance of
these bonds. At that time that number seemed quite high and was set
only as a check point to make sure that a good look was taken at this
process before the limit was exceeded.
At this time the status of the issuance of these bonds in
Shakopee is as follows:
FIRM DATE OF ISSUANCE AMOUNT
Valley Park Inc. (Valleyfair) Issued in 1976 $1,000,000
Toro Issued in 1975 $2,100,000
Certain Teed Issued in 1973 $1,000,000
Perkins Steak & Cake - Preliminary (Feb. of 1980) $ 600,000
Approved
Ziegler Inc. " (Dec. of 1979) $2,500,000
Scctland Warehouse " (Feb. of 1980) $1,000,000
Kmart Store " (Dec. of 1979) $1,000,000
Ashland Oil " (Feb. 5, 1980) $1,000,000
J & B Enter- prises ,Hearing 2 -5 -80 $ 950,000
North Central Distributors (no application yet) $1,500,000
$12,650,000
The current assessed valuation of Shakopee is $59,618,887. The
current policy would allow the City to issue Industrial Revenue Bonds
up to $14,154,721. If all of the revenue bonds listed above went as
projected, we would have a remaining $1,504.721 of bonds which we could
issue. Each year of course the valuation of the City goes up and there-
fore the existing limit would go up. If for example, the valuation
went up by $8 million in 1981 we would have an additional $2 million
of bonds we could issue or a total of $3.5 million from now through
1981.
l .5
Industrial Revenue Bonds
February 4, 1980
Page -2-
Because of the current high interest rates, I expect a continued
high level of interest in either industrial revenue bonds or mortgage
notes and therefore this amount will not be sufficient to meet all
that will be requested.
I have again discussed the Industrial Revenue Bonds with Bob
Pulscher, the new President of Springsted Inc. Although he has some
serious concerns about the long range effects of Industrial Revenue
Bonds and mortgage rates nationally because he feels they will hurt
the municipal bond market, he has stated that there is no impact on
Shakopee's Bond Rating or ability to sell bonds caused by the
issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds at any level. He has stated that
there is no reason to set an upper limit on Industrial Revenue Bonds.
He does still feel that the City should carefully look at each
request to be sure it is feasible. This is not because the City is
accepting any liability, but only because we should not get involved
in anything which is not financially feasible.
Recommendation:
1. The City Council should eliminate the 25% of assessed
valuation limit and either replace it with a 50% limit or no limit.
The 50% limit would allow plenty of room for several years and provide
another check point to reevaluate the situation. This is, however,
a completely artificial limit and has no real meaning.
2. The City Council should discuss the possibility of setting
more stringent requirements for this financing tool. These could
include such requirements as the minimum number of jobs created,
minimum size of issue, minimum size of structure, or whether the
property has sewer and water, industrial versus commercial projects.
All of these are purely discretionary and may not be appropriate.
Staff recommends that no restrictions be placed in order that Shakopee
does not inhibit any type of industrial and commercial growth. If
we place limits and other cities do not, we may be forcing the loss
of tax base.
3. If the Council wishes to change the policies, it is suggested
that you indicate the changes needed and direct staff to bring back
a revised policy. There are some technical changes which staff would
also recommend to change, submission requirements, etc.
DSR /jsc
•
C
MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council
. FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Reclassification of Assessing Secretary and Deputy
City Treasurer
DATE: January 29, 1980
Attached are several memos providing information on these two
positions. My recommendation is that neither the salaries or the
classification should be changed for either position. This recommenda-
tion is made for the following reasons:
Deputy City Treasurer
1. I do not believe that there has been any lack of salary
review or increases granted in the past. The increases granted have
been in line with other city employees of equal responsibility.
2. I have carefully checked the salaries of other people in
other cities performing these same duties, and while there no two
situations exactly the same, I feel that the current level of
compensation is fair in comparison to the other cities. There
are other cities that pay more and some that pay less and the duties
vary greatly.
3. I have carefully reviewed the responsibilities of this employee
with other employees and feel that this position is similar in
responsibility and training to those of the secretary in the Police
Department, the secretary in the Assessing /Building Department and
the Engineering Department and Parks and Recreation Department.
4. The increasing of the classification of this position could
only be made in conjunction with the reclassification of all the
other employees who have similar levels of responsibility. If not,
we will have justifiable concerns on the part of other employee..
S. The employee now occupying this position is not in my
evaluation an exceptional employee who constantly performs her job
in an outstanding manner, who works exceptionally well with other
• employees, who seeks out responsibility, who provides positive leader-
ship to new employees, and who is a highly confidential employee ;and,
therefore should not be classified in an exceptional manner based on
superior performance. She is a good• employee who performs her job well.
6. I have talked with this employee and she still feels that she
should receive more compensation. I believe this feeling is based
mainly on her feeling that her job should be compensated at a rate
equal to that of the Deputy City Clerk.
•
•
Reclassification of Assessing Secretary
and Deputy City Treasurer
January 29, 1980
Page -2-
Assessing /Building Secretary
1. Increases granted in the past for this employee reflected
a mutual city employee agreement that she was in training to become
an assessor. She subsequently decided not to pursue this and has
been therefore given the building department duties. Her salary
increases in the last two years have been average or slightly below
because of the large increase received two years ago.
2. I have looked at salaries for similar secretaries in other
cities and find that while some get more and some get less, that she
is currectly classified.
3. I have reviewed the classification of this employee in compar-
ison with other city employees and feel that her work and responsibilities
are equal to the Deputy City Treasurer, the Engineering Secretary,
the Police Secretary and the Park and Recreation Secretary. Her work
requires different skills from these, however, I believe the require-
ments are at a similar level of difficulty and require a similar
amount of training.
4. The employee now in this position is not an exceptional
employee who is so far better than the other people performing the
same type of job that she should be reclassified. She is a good
employee who is well suited for her position and well represents the
City with public. I have talked with her and she does not feel she
should be reclassified.
DSR /jsc
0
SALARY HISTORIES FOR DEP. CITY CLERK, DEP. CITY TREAS. AND ASSESSING SEC.
•
•
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
Dep. City Clerk 10,500 11,025 12,000 12,840 14,124
Dep. City Treas. 9,464 10,155 10,865 11,515 12,666
Assessing Sec. (CETA) 7,800 9,039 10,500 11,132 12,245
AS REQUESTED BY COUNCILMAN IIULLANDER
•
klk
•
•
DUTIES OF '1'1ll?
DE U'1'Y CI'T'Y 'TREASURER
1. Payroll
A. Times sheets - verify and enter in computer
B. Personnel data changes
C. Bookwork
D. Protect and issue checks
•
II. financial.
A . Code and prepare invoices for computer
B. Reconcile statements
C. Prepare bill list for Council
D. Collate and issue checks
E. Type and issue handwritten chucks
P. Coumaunity Services Bills
C. Monthly federal and state withlaoldin
H. Quarterly reports for t'.iT,SI'i', F LCA, an d`Surcharge
I. Monthly report to Metro Waste Control
J. Monthly report for water connections and water meters collected
K. Yearly reconciliatio of W -2
L. Create and change vendor list as needed (400► vendors) fur SPUC.
III. Budget
' A. Create budget file - enter annual appropriations.
B. Enter previous years figures
C. Enter estimated year end.
• D. Enter dept. head request,adm.' request, Council approval
E. Adjust as needed
usually 3 budget worksheet„ before final + mid - ye
Note: Computer knowledge of some 2OO+ transactions.
IV. Additional Duties
A. Type= Treasurer's correspondence.
B. Process insurance claims and related correspondence.
C. Special Assessments
•
1. oral and written searches
2. assist in yearly certification to County
D. Update personnel files
E. Bank reconciliations
F. Notary
G. Assist in preparing; annual reports
H. Assist auditors during annual audit.
1. Attend Logis meetings when necessary
J. Invoice "customer" for. City services.
K. Prepare monthly Ceta report.
L. Cigarette Licenses.
M. Assist workmens compensation auditor
N. Did most of training of receptionists
0. Verify and receipt monies from Community Services
P. Verify and receipt swimming pool monies.
Q. Make deposits
R. Knowledge of all building and related permits
S. Fill in for AsSessing Secretary when absent.
Tri&
•
DUTIES OF DEP. CITY TREASURER (contd)
IV. Additional Duties
T. Fill in for City Treasurer when absent.
U. Ability to work not only in finance, but building, assessing and admin-
istration as well.
Note: Up to August of 1978 also handled all building and related permits.
Qualifications: 10 years accounting experience
2 years college - major sociology, minor business
Previous supervisory experience
AS REQUESTED BY COUNCILMAN IIIJLI,ANDER
•
•
klk
• /
IHII'! I I' ;: �tl Ili' ;I'u'ry A :ir;; :,cr1t
A. 1 w i l.h comp': I.;► 1. i c,r► n t' ;e:;:;e :lsrne:n I, r't,e ;or'(1:;
lt. i'U COI'd f I I .,a I ('., (I Cot' L i f i e ;►Le: of Heal f.' ;..t :aLe Value)
C . Keep c'rt r't'c:n L w i Lh °wile r':;I► ill change:; and update t.e Lhe
alpi'rabeL ion I, picLor Ia1, and Iegal eie:scripLion Ciies.
I). AHH i sI. new own(' r' :s w i Lir app I y i n}; for Homestead
E. He other Dena ri.meran wi t.h iri formal. ion refyir'di.n €,
owric r :;hilt r, f' p roper l y ovine r:;
F. Help Real torn, I.nwyern, et, . vii t.h info rmation of properties
G . Hui p pub I i e regardirr}.r, quo ;Liens on Lheir property.
II. Comp.(' e': ;t.I mali'd Lax en for property owner::;
f . Ass.i :; r w i Lh ; truitt;a I Ilea r'd o f' Review (colnl: i 7 ing ,
data for Counei I and Lend Board meeLi,n € {: )
J. Attend .;rhouI5 and near' nar' wc,r'knhol,5 to re>t.iin my
Corti l'.ic;;►I,1un.
K. V;ar'.'ety or c,l her duI,i
Ill I I I I► I IJt; Itl;1'Alel'MEH.i'
A. I ssuo lltt i I el i n }: I'c: I nl i
13. SSue PIt.tmhiut',, Ile ;►l.iny,, Eleet.r•ical , Str'eet. Opening, and
Burn i nl{ Perm 11. :;
C. Recdi.ftL nronie : :; for liui Iding Fermi t.:;
I). Record al I Itni Id.11t , Perini. Ls
r ;. Set. tap f'i te: e.�n al I CIMUIer•ri;1I ;Ind Ref; i, ti;tl ,jobs
F. >et L tip r risi of l i nit on I I n i'c t' fart i I d i ng I nnpee t or
G. Type any viol ;II.ion 111:1,ice:;
1I. Tyltc :; month l y 1tn it d i rip, Ac t. i vi Ly Report. for i r— office
ir'► forma L, ion, rodet•al Censtin Bureau, Dodge Report, etc.
I.
Variety of' ell her (1t►I.i en
is nt (:)t ht, r IS l,;t I I.nrelrl ,. wheri Short. h;aneied
rcito LypI ig, e•L• .
Pe: l.,er Heeitte•HI or I'ottri.'I I ItoI IaII to I'
Chaska Savage Lakeville Eden Praire Prior Lake Shakopee
Title Sr. Clerk' Treas. Sr. Dep. Clk Bookkeeper Sr. Clerk Sr. Clerk
1980 rate 12,064 12,688 13,776 12,300 12,666
Size dept 5 1 4 5 2+ 2+
Supervisor no no no no no no
Duties
. Payroll x X. x x x
Ins x
SAC rpts x x
Permits
Disburse x x x x x
Receits x x x x x
Specials x x x
Payables x x x x x
Receivables x • x x x x x
Cashier x x x
•
Utility x
Statements x x x
Bank Recon. x x x
Data entry x x
•
• Chaska has a range for salary for this position and essentially has two people
in the'position. The'range for 1980 starts at $9,750 for entry level and tops at $12,950
for an outstanding perfromer.
In talking to people from the other cities, I came to the conclusion that they
do not have as many duties assigned to one person as we do. I would not necessarily say
that this entails more work because one duty at one city may involve more work than at
another city due to different ways of doing things.
•
•
•
•
•
— - ACCCUNTING - LEVEL if •
Sk11_ Level II - Jobs requiring bookkeeping or accounting training at a level cf two years of formal Typical Title: SSMC R ACCOUN1U,
business school training beyond high school or equiS work experience. J
Descr�pticn - Performs the more complicated posting and calculating operations on one or more sets of accourting
records. Judgment and interpretation are often required in the daily work routine. May direct
work of lower level accounting clerks. Union Job :: a )
Mul, , c pie ar_
1 11 , rates quoted monthly.
Actual Rates ! � Rate Ran-e
1 No.of ! Mean 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500. i vr "
I I Empl. ! Salary ( 00 50 00 50 00 5G 00 50 00 50 00 50 00 50 OC 50 00 Union: Title -- Mir.. ! Max. ! k... •
1 9 1 A ccountin Technician $ 9 47 '$1171 I +: ! i
J
� State Minnesota 93 $1057 niv si of Minn. 1100 b 19 17 17 42 Senor Accounting Specialist 947 1171 '
niversity c Min 93 1
! 1aD 4 23 T 46 ( 9 P I
, MEAN $1081
r I 5 2 i Accts Payable 6 Accts Receivable Clerk 890 I 1261 1 -
Metro Airports Comm. j 2 1055 ! 1 Principal Accounting Clerk 1063 1 1444 I !
-.Metro Waste Comm 1 1 1251 + y79 A djustment Pending) * 111 Disbursements Su6erviser I I 1
— Metro 'tt. I 11 � �
I i -1
• MEAN n $1122 I i 1238 1 3 1 2 15 I Senior Accounting Clerk i 956 1263 !
• Hennepin County i 22 238 -
I oz I
Ramse County ' 25 I 1263 I i VE3 1235
y 1 2 4 6 6 6 Accountirg Clerk I 9 1224 o a 3 22 Acccur.t ;r? Clerk 11 506 1217 `
St. apci +s 31 ! _ 25
St. •. 1;53 3 2 1 1 ACC CVrt•n TnC-- .ICtdr I _ .i : 1 - i c '
MEAN 51250 - _-- .. _I
Aroka Count, ; ' Senior Accounting Clerk 635 _CZ3
• t, 7 I 58 6 1 1 2 1 1 1 ( Chief Clerk, Bookkeeper
bids ^,.r gtor nc I
akgta Count; 7
I r • z i g 1 1 • Accounting Clerk II i 7` -7 ; 905 3E ,
.,.ounty ! 47 1 , - r ; 1
,_ 1 3 • Accounting Clerk III g9- - - --
Scott county 1007 1 1 1 9 ! ; ..
! 4 j ! 5 5 - i 1
!Carver Court 6 394 _ _ Clerk III; Chief Deputy Clerk 725 i
L MEAL, $696 1 ! Accountant 77 i 12 T--
3 1 2 Junior Accountant; Accountan,
I Edoom.rgter• . ! l 1285 1 Accounting Clerk I ! 513 • IC.:.;.: • '
cd na 985 2 3 __� , ., ;
St. _outs Park I 1 I 1144 I Accounting Clerk - Treasurer • . • _,
! R 1 1 3 I 957 1 2 a 1 Accounting Clerk I ; I I 533 I 1 - _
Richfield •old ! -
I Y.rnetonka 2 396 2 Accountirg Clerk;Utility Billing Clerk 907 -c, ,
•Brcokiyn Ce-ter 2 I 936 1 1 I I Accounting Clerk V 1 827 , ,.
! Erookiyr Park 2 1 1076 I 1 1 Accounting Technician II 575 i 1C I
1 1 45 1 ( Parcel Records Specialis `7: 1 108 ,
I Fur ; i 9 s 1 1 !Senior Clerks (Various; i 7g '
' C r s a 3 I 907 i 2 f Clerk I I I; Clerk IV ' - r _ 1
I
, acl we i • Accounting Clerk 575 � :C`: 1 -
!!a;..ewced � - 1
2 9G5
I : 217 _ Accounting Clerk j 6.7 i :125 I
•te Lake 1 I 1031 1 ( Senior Accounting Clerk
'c :der :alley 1 I 1165 I 1 1 Senior Clerk - Accountin 10Io 1165 -
>outr St. Paul (1979 Ad Pending) Senior Accounting Clerk
heights eights 2 1069
Columbia h
2 Senior Accounting Clerk 562 979 3
New mbiah 2 069 1 Accounting Clerk (Liquor, Utilities) 1 844 1133 "
Eagan 4 938 2 2 Senior Accounting Clerk -
;.lest St. Paul 1 972 1 Senior Accounting Clerk 882 1071 ;.
' 'cttage Grove 2 1034 1 1 . Accounting Clerk I; Chief Accountant
'ver Grove He.^�ts 1 994 1 Accounting Clerk I 539 994
, ••.pie Valley - 2 990 1 1 Sr Accounting Clk; Sr Liquor Records Clk 614 765
I Maple Grove 2 912 1 1 Dept Assessor, Special Assessment Clerk
I !'cpkins 5 876 2 1 2 ' Senior Accounting Clerks (Various) 705 9G" - 2
obbinsdale 2 955 1 • 1 Senior Bookkeeper 85 10261 •
1 ,creview 1 934 1 Accounting Clerk 847 93=
1 Anoka 3 868 1 1 1 Cashier; Spec Assent Clk; Accts Payable CI< 740 1057
•lastings 1 877 1 Bookkeeper
Mounds View 1 840 1 Senior Accounting Clerk
Stillwater 1 1045 1 Senior Accounting Clerk 770 1_45 '.��
'akevi :le 2 966 2 Motor Vehicle Deo Clk; Sr Deout; Clk 725 97-
2 917 1 — _ __ - Eookkee •er• Utility Assessment Ger. _ 502 I _. -yi ___
;Cortirued,
c mean 7C ; _OC ;CC iCu0 ' :v'O 200 :500 _ -u0 ---1,---- -
_____-�__ - al. ' _a'_3r.'C 'C: CC =u =0 00 =0 00 =0 CO .0 00 `0 OC =0 00 .Jr. o ! Title -- Min. a,.4a,
=force 3 5 i 1 f Utility Clerk /Deputy City Clerk o
v:1% - i Deputy City Treasurer
-
1210 ! • ,
a.._ ; 1 1210 210 1 1 iqucr Bookkeeper 832 1217
' Utility Billing Clerk
CJeJ Jr :1 1152 ! 1 y 9
1
- °7 ver Senior Accounting Clerk
! 2 I s j , 1 Accountant Assessment Bill
J 1ng Clerk
- a^le a Sr 1 .Acctng elk; Spec Assmt /Util ailing elk 867 371
1 1 .67
' Accounttng Clerk II !
^^ ! " 1 Deputy Treasurer
w i I i
-'a -3 ; 1 88 i
1 Treasurer 508
u --c,. -e ;r:s '• 1 1 .963 1 f 1100
': -' - {- -'k 3 2 '• 1 ;2l 1 Bookkeeper I i
_ ; ._ _ -. - t e I Head Bookkeeper; Deputy Clerk ( j
''ce I 1 �- 8 2 7 1 1 Deputy Clerk I I
3 . __ ! 25 1
1 Senior Accounting Clerk I I !
_ j �� i Assistant Deputy Clerk
• 1 j l i
a: c I _ - e r 1 3cckkeeper `! 1
c.c :b i Accounts Clerk 76 i127
,Deputy Clerk Treasurer ! I
, - Ser,.cr Accounting Clerk
'az , �, i 1 i Deputy Clerk
i
s ! • ! J ' 3 ! Account Director 763 1084
_, 1 35 i I Deputy Clerk- Treasurer
1
•
Accounting Clerk it 880 1004 3
3 •u 1 2 Bookkeeper/Treasurer; Liquor 'cckkeeper 650 910
} _2 - -- j ` 1 1 Deputy Clerk_rreasurer
I - -_- - - - -- - I -- . —___ i 3 1 21 3 ° - 66 33 "3 7" _0 i0 :3 1_ ? 1 I I I -
� - ' :'_ L 6 1 31.000 11100 3'_1:0 -
Mean Ci Median --
Q1 <5
Job No. 35
COMPARISON WITH RELATED SURVEY INFORMATION
Mean Median Middle 50%
No. of Monthly Monthly of Rates Monthly
Employees Salary Salary (Q1-Q1) Rate Range
METRO SURVEY (above) 375 $1086 $1100 $1000 -1150 (See above)
Private Industry (Twin Cities) •
77 Representative Companies
Accounting Clerk A, a similar skill level 1029 960 945 855 -1065
Federal Government (Nationwide)
Rate Range for similar accounting jobs in GS -5, , .
with maximum shown reached normally after 7 years
$ 876-1021
A CCD'AT ?,u - LErE' ' '
1k level • • - Entry -level prc,festional accounting jobs requiring training at the level cf a ; picai tie: A +�CCihTA: b
lour -.ear ccllege degree or requivaient woiic. experience.
Sescription - Performs accounting work involving evaluation and ingenuity in main'tatning a set of accounts,
preparing financial reports and assisting in budget preparations and other analyses. May
assist higher level accounting personnel - and supervise the work of account clerks. `r�.
OBSERVATION - Some of the employees reported here are not ccllege graduates, but have the equivalent in work experience • Union Job
1
All rates quoted monthly. -
i I I Actual Rates I • Rate Range • '
i I No.of ! Mean 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 leo 1ia11900 I • f - Y�s. is
50 00 2° C' OC 25 50 75 -25 5C 75 00- 4C -CO -50 -CO Union Title -- Min. Ma i Max 1
I iEmpl. .Salary .00-50-00 2� 0 7. 0 5 75 •
i I
{ State of Minnesota- I 54 t$1210 4 5 6 - 14 7 15 1 1 • � 1 , Accounting Officer 510 6 1307 , ,
I University of Minn, s . 14 1265 ' 1 1 1 .2 _ , _ 3. 1 1 tC -. Accountant • 1051 I 135 { • I. 'MEAN $1221' , i -
!Metro Airports Comm. 2 : 1440 ) 2 Accountant /Aud•tor • { 1360 i 1852 I 6 ! •
} �. 1 • + Accourtant i f ti
•
I ' r 1 i 1 Ad Adjustment rending :
'Metro Waste Comm. (1579 1 I __:
MEAN 71440 • I i -
I. I 1525 I 1 2 1 9 i s Accountant ! _ 1 7 : 1 15
i .
Her ^erin unt ' 13 1- 2 i 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 ;Accountant I I 12 i 1 i 5 !
Ramsey County 10 1462 i 3 2 2 3 � 'Accountant I 1363
Minneapol i 10 ' 1612 1
St. Paul 1 I 11 1316 2 4 4 1 • ;Accountant i I 12 26 I 1614 I I
1 1
MEAN $1478 t • I ! • i i E 1 1 1 I ! Account I M 16C7 I 6 o
I Anoka Count 3- 1400 1 'V' c y I iii; i I i
y ' 1 { 1 Accountant, fice
'Dakota Count} 2 . 1406 I i nt C I i 3 f:+ashirgtcn County I 2 1 1334 I 1 1 IAccoun.ting Technician. i 1233 1357 I
MEAN $1383 I i I I ! I j I
i St. Louis Park 1 1166 I 1 ;Accountant 1111 ' ; 1444
Coon Rapids I 1 1433 I 1 •Treasurer , I 1233 150C
Brooklyn Center l J. 1487 i 1 'Accountant , I
Burnsville 1 1105 1 1
Fridley •Assessnt -Rcds Specialist i 1010 31 1015 i 1250 '
1 'Genera Accountant 1 1
1 I � !
7 I 1 1167 'General
Finance Director i
Crystal 1167 1 1 lit; ' 1553 3 I
Y 1 � 1 Accountant i
Blaine t 1 1169 I
'Accountant Assistant
Golden Valley
1 1142 1
'Accountant 1154 1311 3 1
New Brighton 1 1311 1
City Accountant 1335 1 1663 i
Columbia Heights 1 1426 1 I y
1 Accountant I I
An oka Grove I 1 1275 A ccountant 1•
Anoka 1 1375 1317 1749
1 t
Hastings 1 998 1 . Accountant t
Eden Prairie • 1 1256 1 Bookkeeper i
MEAN $1245
1 5 b 8 1 17 1 4 4 10 16 7 6 7 6 3 3 2 5 12 1 3 I
_ 135 $1319 $1175 $1300 $1425
• Mean Cl Median Q3 •
•
-S)
•
.C2/
• j -
MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: : Gregg M. Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Hourly Rate for Fire Calls
DATE: January 29, 1980
Our current rate for fire calls to the townships is $140.00
an hour. Due to increase wages, fuel and a higher average
of fire fighters per call, I recommend we set the rate
for 1980 at $165.00 per hour. The $165.00 is derived as
follows:
1980 Pay Rate $ 6.75
Average Men Responding x 22
$ 148.50
Average Fuel Use for All Calls 10 Gallons
Estimated 1980 Average Price /Gallon 1.50 $ 15.00
Total $ 163.50
Round to "$165.00"
Action: Motion to set the hourly fire call rate to $165.00
per hour.
•
GMV /ljw
•
A
MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg M. Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Uncollected Fire Call Bills
DATE: January 29, 1980
The Fire Service Agreement with Jackson and Louisville
Townships states: "As a further and additional consideration, •
the City of Shakopee will bill the owner of record the sum
of $140.00 per hour for each fire call. The minimum bill for
a fire call will be $140.00. The rate of $140.00 per hour
will be used during the year beginning March 1, 1978, and will
be adjusted in subsequent years by the City of Shakopee as fuel
costs and salaries are adjusted."
The agreement states that we will perform the billing
function, it does not say that the City will absorb the
uncollectables. We send out three notices, after that we
would have to;go to court or pay for a collection agency or
absorb the cost. The townships can assess the bill against
the property for collections.
Louisville has $560.00 in outstanding calls and Jackson
has $560.00 as of 12/31/79. It is recommended that the City
take the position that the uncollectables are the responsibility
of the township and that the amount of outstanding bills be
included with the standby fee for the year. -
•
GMV /lw
•
9 •
MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg M. Voxland, Finance Director.
RE: C.E.T.A. Position
DATE: January 31, 1980
We currently have a C.E.T.A. position open. This position
was previously filled by Jean Stearling. We have received
one application and the person appears qualified. Request
Council authorize hiring of Esther Johnson at the rate of
$3.50.an hour to start with , a raise to $3.85 an hour
after the six month probationary period.
•
GMV /ljw
•
•
•
•
•
CITY OF SHAKOPEE kW§mer
Nsvi
INCORPORAT<D 1a70 litUS
129 E. First Ave., Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445 -3650 rt
January 28, 1980 •
Mr. Robert Pulscher
Springsted, Inc.
Suite 813 Osborn Building
St. Paul, MN 55102
RE: Proposed City of Shakopee Assessment Policies
for Reconstruction of Streets and Utilities
Dear Bob:
As we have discussed on several occasions, the Shakopee
City Council is in the process of setting policies to govern
the method of financing the needed reconstruction of streets,
sanitary sewer and water facilities in Shakopee.
I have attached the proposed policies which the City
Council has directed staff to analyse to determine the long
range effect on the City's financial position. I have also
attached the staff's projection of the cost of the various
types of projects we foresee in the next ten years and the
breakdown of the financing in accordance with the attached
policy.
I would like to meet with you sometime this week to discuss
the proposed policies. The City Council may want your opinion
either in writing or by your oral comments at a future council
meeting.
I will call to set up a meeting, if possible.
Sincerely,
C �
Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
DSR /jiw
Enclosures
•
7 z e Hear/ o f / r o q r e s s a l l c11
An Equal Opportunity Employer
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT POLICIES.FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
City of Shakopee
Sanitary Sewer
A. Trunk Sanitary + Sewers
1. New trunk sewers will be 100 percent assessed
on an area basis against all benefited property.
2. Replacement of trunk sewers will be financed from
the sewer fund revenues. Revenues will be derived
from user fees and hook -up charges.
a. User fees
b. Hook -up charges
B. Lateral Sanitary Sewer
1. New sanitary sewer laterals will be 100 percent
assessed against all benefited property.
• 2. Replacement sanitary sewer laterals will be from
the sewer fund revenues derived from user fees and
hook -up charges.
Water
A. Trunk Water Facilities
1. New trunk watermains will be 100 percent assessed
on an area basis against benefited property.
2. Replacement trunk watermainswill be financed from
the water fund revenues derived from user fees
and hook -up charges.
B. Lateral Water Facilities
1. New watermain laterals will be 100 percent assessed
against benefited property.
2. Replacement watermains will be financed from the
water fund revenues derived from user fees and
hook -up charges.
rwt-
•
-2-
Storm Sewer
A. Trunk Storm Sewer Facilities
1. The cost of constructing new trunk storm sewer
facilities will be 50 percent assessed and 50
percent paid by ad valorem taxes.
2. The cost of replacing or improving existing
storm sewer trunks will be paid from the annual
budget for storm sewers financed by ad valorem
. taxes.
B. Lateral Storm Sewer Facilities
1. The cost of constructing lateral storm sewer
;facilities will be 100 percent assessed.
2. The cost of replacing or improving lateral
storm sewer facilities will be paid from the
annual budget for storm sewer financed by
=ad valorem taxes.
C. It should be noted that the major trunk storm sewer
facility planned for the upper valley in Shakopee which
will serve Shakopee as well as other areas of Scott
County, should be financed by a newly created
watershed district which will assess all benefited
property.
Streets
•
A. • All new normal residential streets will be 100 percent
assessed against the benefited property. For arterial
streets, the cost of the extra pavement thickness
or width will be paid by the City with state aid,
FAU funds or ad valorem taxes.
B. Reconstruction, improvement and maintenance of existing
streets shall be financed by ad valorem taxes.
PROJECTS TO BE FINANCED BY THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Street Sidewalk
Reconstruction Sanitary Storm Construction New Plats
and Sewer Sewer and Community (Street ANNUAL.
Construction Reconstruction Construction Reconstruction Facilities Watermain Water, Sewer) TOTAL
. + ._ .
Assessed 1,000,000 25,000 50,000 500,000 $1,575,00(:
1980 Ad Valorem 100,000 , 600,000 700,000
Other 110,000 50,000 160.000
State Aids 200,000 25,000 225,000
TOTAL
$2,660
Assessed 25,000 100,000 200,000
325,000
Ad Valorem 200,000 200,000
1981 Other 100,000 100,000 200.000
State Aids 100,000 25,000 125,000
TOTAL
$ 850,000
Assessed 150,000 25,000 50,000 150,000 $ 375,000
Ad Valorem 200,000 150,000 350,000
1982 Other .
State Aids 100,000 25,000 50,000 50,000
125,000
TOTAL
900,000
Assessed 25,000 150,000 $ 175,000
Ad Valorem 200,000
200,000
1983 Other 100,000 100,000
State Aids 25,000 25,000
TOTAL .
$ 500,000
Assessed 150,000 $ 150,000
Ad Valorem 200,000 300,000 500,000
1984 Other - -0-
State Aids 100,000 100,000
TOTAL _
750,000
PROJECTS TO BE FINANCED BY THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Street Sidewalk -
Reconstruction Sanitary Storm Construction New Plats
and Sewer Sewer and Community (Street ANNUAL
Construction Reconstruction Construction Reconstruction Facilities Watermain Water Sewer) TOTAL
Assessed _ 150,000 $ 150,000
1985 Ad Valorem 200,000 200,000
Other 100,000 100,000
State Aids -0-
TOTAL 450,000
Assessed 150,000 150,000
1986 Ad Valorem 200,000 200,000
Other -0-
State Aids 100,000 -0-
TOTAL a. 350,000
Assessed 150,000 c.. 150,000
Ad Valorem 200,000 200,000
1987 Other . -O-
State Aids 100,000 100,000
TOTAL 4. 450,000
Assessed 150,000 c. 150,000
Ad Valorem 200,000 200,000
1988 Other _. -0-
State Aids 100,000 100,000
TOTAL 4. 450,000
Assessed
150,000 4. 150,000
Ad Valorem 200,000 200,000
1989 Other -0-
State Aids 100,000 100
•
TOTAL 4. 450,000
•
r
c •
PROJECTS TO BE FINANCED BY THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Street Sidewalk
Reconstruction Sanitary Storm Construction New Plats
and Sewer Sewer and Community (Street ANNUAL
Construction Reconstruction Construction Reconstruction Facilities Watermain Water, Sewer) TOTAL
Assessed 150,000 $ 150,000
Ad Valorem • 200,000 300,000 500,000
1990 Other 100,000 100,000
State Aids -0-
TOTAL $ 750,000
Assessed -0- -0- $1,150,000 100,000 -0- 200,000 $1,900,000 $3,350,000
Ad Valorem 2,100,000 -0- 750,000 -0- 600,000 -0- -0- 3,450,000
TOTALSOther -0- 310,000 -0- -0- -0- 400,000 -0- 710,000
State Aids 900,000 -0- -0- 100,000 -0- -0- -0- 1,000,000
4 T0TAL $3,000,000 $ 310,000 $1,900,000 $ 200,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $1,900,000 $8,510,000
1) Other Catagory
Includes funding for reconstruction of existing water and sewer .... facilities. The proposed policy would fund these out of
the sewer fund and the water fund. This would probably require some bonding, using either General Obligation or Revenue
Bonds paid out of these funds.
2) Community Facilities
This includes the construction of a new City Hall and a new Fire. Station financed by General Obligation Bonds.
90
"
J;:i�i 1980 ��, �•.,
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
114CORPORATRO ,1670 - i tf
' �'
• 129 E. First Ave., Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445 -3650 t " �'`°;
444
. January 29, 1980
City Council
City of Shakopee
129 East First`Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
I hereby request that the City of Shakopee make the following
improvements for Eastview First Addition:
1. Roadway
2. Watermain
. 3. Sewer Main
. 4. Storm Sewer Main
I am the sole owner of all lots in said addition and I hereby
waive my right to a public hearing for the said improvements.
Sincerely, ;
W //1 .---- 1. , - A William M. Chard
State of Minnesota ) '
) ss
County of Scott )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 3o,h day
of January , 1980,
by William M. Chard
(Name of property owner)
c - 1 -_____ 44. ?—_
P JOHN E PLOETZ
�., NOTARY PUBLIC—MINNESOTA Sig�turc of perso)aking acknowledgement
r. SCOT COUNTY
'' 'L MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 11.15 8'
I r r / 1 h F � ,' cl 1' 4 , / i t r � r ,1 r • ti I 4 : ! � c !
MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer
SUBJECT:
DATE: January 29, 1980
Attached please find a revised change order No. 1, previously
authorized by Council. The original amount has been changed
and the, time of completion has been extended.
These alterations have been approved by Kmart Corp. and M.A.
Mortenson according to agreement. Therefore, I recommend
that City execute Change Order No.1.
HRS :nae
•
•
•
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
INCORPORATED 111117D •
129 E. First Ave., Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445 -3650
;J
� 1 1
4
CHANCE ORDER NO. 1 D A L E JANUARY 14, 1980
PROJECT NAME
__ ROUGH GRADING & SITE UTILITY CONTRACT
DESCRIP'T'ION OF WORK TO BE ADDED t,i; I)I ;1.ETEH:
INSTALL PORTIONS OF FIRE LOOP WITH APPURTENANCES.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 1,141,400.00_
CHANGE ORDER(S) NO. 1 'I'IIRU NO. - - -- (ADD, XI MINK) $ - 388,300.00
TOTAL FUNDS ENCUMBERED $_. - - -- 1,529,700.00 _ .
- - ..__.. __ .-- • ., - • --
The above described work shall be (deleted from, added tot thy. Contract under the same
conditions specified In the original Contract unless otherwise specified herein. Any
work not so specified shall be performed in accordance with the Standard Specifications
. adopted by the City of Shakopee. The number of days for completion shall be (increased,
)0 XK ) by 180 � consecutive calendar days ro a total of 255
consecutive calendar days.
I hereby agree to perform the work specified in this ch,tn};e order in accordance with
the specifications, conditions and prices specified above.
CONTRACTOR: i j7A,g, :'S r= S 0 t J,1`? ,- - -._.
TITLE: This Change Order, Rough Grading & Utility Contract, Contract No. HRA 79 - 01, is
read,'agreed to and ratified by K - mart Corporation and M.A. Mortenson Company,
its acting general contractor.
•
•
K -MART CORPORATION M.A. MOR.'ENSON COMPANY
BY: J
#9 , / �% ___ --
TITLE: j /
TITLE: f�1_7�BG /
, • /4 01FENQx4, CITY OF SHAKOPEE )DO.}
o
$� 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
•
• \J. •1 a/
MEMO
TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director •
SUBJECT: Interfund Transfers
DATE: 1/23/80
•
•
Request Council'approve interfund transfers of $16,242.64 f or
the items listed below, as per budget.
Sound System $ 2,165.00
Typewriter 1,457.40
Total Capital Equipment Fund $ 3,622.40
Fire Hose $ 3,060.00
Compactor (Street) 1,050.00
Base Radio (Fire). 728.41
Bleachers 2,913.00
Carpet 2,908.75
Bldg. Monitor (Police) 638.80
Hose Expander (Fire) 837.30
6" Suction Hose (Fire) 484.03
Total Revenue Sharing Fund 12,620.29
$ 16,242.69
Action: Motion to approve transfer of $16,242.69 from the Revenue
Sharing Fund to the General Fund and $3,622.40 from the Capital
Equipment Revolving Fund to the General Fund.
•
•
GV /ljw
)D1
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
RE: Advisory Bodies
DATE: January 29, 1980
Attached is a list of people who the Council has indicated
should serve on the various advisory bodies. The Council
formally acted on several of these, however, not on all of
them.
For purposes of
ve all
the have a
approve
attached.
DSR /jiw
Attachment
•
1980 COUNCIL LIAISON APPOINTMENTS
Shakopee School Board Cncl. Leroux
Shakopee Community Services Cncl. Lebens
Public Utilities Commission Cncl. Reinke
Joint Seven Man Committee Cncl. Colligan*
Shakopee Fire Department Cncl. Colligan*
Scott County Board Mayor Harbeck
Planning Commission
Shakopee Bypass Committee
Community Education Advisory Douglas S. Reeder
Council
Police Civil Service
Commission
Scott County Criminal Justice Cncl. Hullander*
Advisory Committee
Vice Mayor Cncl. Reinke*
*Appointments made on January 2, 1980
Other offices are for two years and are unexpired!
•
•
Shak -O- Valley Amateur Hockey Inc.
Building Fund. Campaign
•
P.O. Sox 200 Shakopee, MN 55379
t
JAN3 1 jci:it
,Y � 'm
C6 �. OF S¢°YAV. P E
January 31, 1980
Honorable Mayor and`Council Members:
The Shak -O- Valley Amateur Hockey Association Building Fund
Campaign Committee requests your approval to construct an
ice arena on city property. The location of this property
is across from the city swimming pool approximately where
the present out -door hockey rink is now located.
The Campaign Committee requests use of this land until the
arena is complete and debt free at which time it will be
turned over to the city. We will submit all plans for your
evaluation and approval.
We would appreciate tentative approval at this meeting." We
also request that one member of the Council be appointed to
serve on the Ice Arena Committee.
Thank you for, your consideration.
• Representing Ice Arena..
Building Committee
Clint Hammer
Chuck Kreuser
•
•
•
.
/fa-
Shak -O- Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc.
Building Fund Campaign
P.O. Box 200 Shakopee, MN 55379
PROJECTED HOURS
OPERATION -- 6 months - October to 31st
October
Hours Weekdays 3 :30 to 10:45 138
Weekends 7 :30 am to 10:30 pm 104
November
Weekdays 2:30 pm to 11:00 pm 126
Weekends 7:30 am to 10:30 pm 156
282
December 307 Hours
January 271 Hours
February 244 Hours
March 277 Hours
Total 1623 Hours
1,623 Hours at $50.00 per hour = $81,1500.00
This is an estimated projection but will give some idea of
available ice.
•
tea/
Volunteers lend a hand for ice arena.
A few supporter of the Shalt-0- According to Clint Hammer, were obtained from the arena Saturday. It took the men until elation atilt hoped to complete its
Valley Amateur Hockey Aueda• association spokesman. Madison, through another party. midnight Saturday before the fund-raising activities this autumn
lion found out last weekend Just Wis., meatpacker Steve Sedalia The cost of the econd•hand equipment was removed and load. and begin work on the arena
how hard it Is to dismantle an Ice offered to donate the Ice rehrigera• equipment ran around $20,000, ed on • semi-trailer, a 10-foot building. However, If the fund-
arena. lion equipment from the five•year- about ene•tenth of what It might flatbed trailer and two 20 -loot box raising Is not completed until later
The men spent a total of a old bankrupt arena if the Shakopee have cost new. ' trucks. this year, construction would begin
' couple days In Schaumberg, Ill., group would puU it from the Most of lheShakopee volunteers All of the equipment, except for next aping. '
where they took apart the Interior suburban Chicago site. The other drove down to Schaumberg last the refrigeration units and fans op Most of the donations to the
•
. (lithe defunct Northwest Ice Arena equipment, which Included hies- Thursday night and began work at the 10 -foot flatbed, was brought to protect have come from local
for transport of Shakopee and chers, Infrared heaters. dashers *Lin. Friday, slid Jim Hoey• The Shakopee Sunday. Hoey said two Individuals and businesses and
installation In the proposed Shako. with plexiglas, a skate - sharpener, work continued until 10 p.m. Fri- men would return to Schaumberg total about half of the $500,000
pee -Ice Arena. scoreboard and sound system also day ana resumed about 1:30 a.m. Ulla weekend for that remaining originally sought for the project.
• load. That $500,000 was set as the goal
. ' • • "The equipment is In good before the association located and
shape and we took everything out obtained the equipment at the • of the Inside of the srena that we reduced price.
0
could," Hoey said. "About the only Along with Hammer and Hoey,
. thing we need now for the Inside of the following volunteers aided /n
the sees L the Zambonl, the the work at Schaumberg last week- i --.•
maFhlne used to make zed recur- end: Kevin Manske. Doug Feaa,
face the ire. We're presently Tom Hager, John Collin, Bill Witt,
Chuck Kreuter, ,Phil Hespenhelde,
Earth, Keh , Bob Scheel•
de
g 6adalich of $oohing lot one." ett Hemmer said the hockey asse- der and Gene Hennes.
.b oosts arena building effort Ice arena pledging
A group ob into anopee wUl party. Hammer said he was en nears haIfi,uy point
head In suburban Cbkago Hammer estimated the coal of aged by the latest developmpments ts
weekend to disassemble and truck the second-hand equipment would , contained le the Badallch gift and
back equipment from a bankrupt run In the range of $20,000. If the the additional low-coat interior
Ice arena that will old the drive in local' arena enthualaata were to equipment. Fund - raising Is going well for An Ice arena steering commit-
building • local Ica facility. purchase the equipment new, the Persons who might be Interest- the proposed Shakopee Ice Arena, tee Is in the process of being
Clint Hammer, spokesman for cost could range as high as ed In assisting the volunteers in according to the latest report from named, Hammer said.When the
the Shak -0 - Valley Amateur Hock- $210,000. their removal of the equipment the Shak- O•Valley Amateur committee Is completed, it will
ey Association, Inc., said the volun• " Such a savings, Hammer said, from the suburban Chicago site Hockey Association, with nearly. oversee all expenditures for the
leers wouM be working to remove would be a boost for the ice arena should contact the local fund- half of the necessary money arena, secure the lease for land
the Ice refrigeration equipment fund-raising effort which currently raising office Immediately at 115- pledged. near Sweeney School from the city
and portions of the Interior from la hovering around halfway on Its 7912, Hammer said. Especially According to association official and work with the building cam•
• the Northwest Ice Arens for reuse attempts to reach the original total needed are a truck driver, an Clint Hammer, the fund is mittee to erect the structure.
to Shakopee. of $500,000. enclosed trailer tractor and other approaching 50 percent of the goal Hammer said the association,
According to Hammer, Mad- volunteers to help with the discs- of between $500,000 and $800,000. still hopes to get the building up
[son If la., meatpapcker Steve Bad- However, Hammer explained, sembling - - The funds to date have been this year, but added he did not
aUcb has offered to donate the Ice r the cost ,savings which will be local ate and foundation gifts expected Although professional fund -
In another matter concerning gathered mainly from local real- know how aoanlhe structure would
ralrigeratian equipment from the . realised from e purchasing the g dents and businesaea with corner- be ready for skating.
five-year-old unsuccessful arena Northwest Ice Arena equipment. thena Hammer
which he purchased earlier U the could help the association to bring arena ar oHic la so ta are working with In the next few weeks as boards of raiser Al Finkle has Shakopee
left Sbsko
group would remove H from its the cost of the overall protect to city officials to D
directors gather f a utumn meet- after his 12-week assistance, the
current home. Other equipmsnt closer to $400,000. Included In that +8nement for the e south Shakopee legs. - group's office remains open from
each as bleachers, dasher with revlsed total V $379,000 for the site It is the Intent of the amateur "The 'people' part of this giving about 9:30 to 11 ■.m. and from
platens, six lairs -red heaters, a building to be constructed on • a site hockey association to turn the has been terrific," Hammer said. about 1:30 to 3:30 p.m.. Hammer
ekate•sbarpeanr, scoreboard and near Sweeney Elementary School arena over to the city when the "We were looking for around said. The phone number at the
'Round system from the arena and the $29,000 In refrigeration and project Is completely paid for In {200,000 from businesses and Iddl• office, at 121 S. Holmes, la 415-71112.
would be purchased from a second ' interior equipment. three rein, victuals In Shakopee. We're clone to
that."
' . F . 1 cities pass the
, Baal. 1 /Papa 1 /SMkop. Valley News /October 3. 1911
E ditorial s nn hat to build ice ar
..
e.._
nas
enas .. . .
A ded effort Bond is failed in referendums
'By Gary Libman 1977 and raised *370.000. Crookston 5250,000, not yet enough for an aro-
- built a 130-0•230 -foot arena, which na. - -
There i9 a group of - opened In 1978. ,
g p people working dilligently in this town who are Voters In Hutchinson, Minn., reject. High school hockey team:, youth
deserving of some public recognifioil,for their efforts. ed a referendum for a 8300,000 While voters across the nation reject hockey leagues and recreational
swlmmlag pool In 1973 aad another school bonds, residents of live small skaters use the arenas in the five
Members of the Shak•O•Vsitey Am ateur Hockey Association, Inc., • fora $550.000 Wrenn$ rink In 1975. Minnesota communities have donal• cities teat have constructed them
and their supporters are building a fund - raising drive to privately finance ed 82 2 million in cash and almost The Alexandria, Buffalo and Hutca-
an indoor ice arena that would be buds on a site near Sweeney "We said. 'Forget you. We're going to 1300,000 In labor and materiels to Jason arenas double as civic antes
go to the people willing to contrlb• build Ice arenas since 1975. Alexan- for trade shows and other events.
Elementary School, The ice antlwslaYla are working to cover the cost of ate; " said Curt Bradford, a local drla's 6,800 residents gave *500,000 Brainerd and Crookston are colloct-
•
the arena through private donation rather than going through the public Realtor and attoroey. after voting down a 1300,000 arena Ing more donations so their arenas
funding route. . In 1971, Brainerd. population 11,600. can be used as civic centers.
Bradford, restaurateur Dick Lenz donated $175,000 for a similar pro-
The twxl•raisera indicate their drive is right around halfway and farm•macbinery dealer Emmett jest and Buffalo's 1,100 residents The Brainerd and Buffalo arenas are
towards the 4500.000 arigina9y projected for the arena. Most of that has McCormick appealed to the town's contributed $310,000 for an arena In run by private directors, but other
9,500 residents for daaations to build that city, - completed fecilltles were donated to
Coma in donations from individuals, families and local businesses who an ire arena. A 11 -week fund drive municipal govemmentx to operate.
are pledging amounts over a three-year period. Major foundation and beginning April I, 1078, raised Among these cities, only Mown- Most are operated at a profit or at a
corporate donors currently are studying the association's proposal for 0515,000, and • 130-b•210.foot area dries city council contributed large small toss. -
action in the next. few weeks. opened la 1977. sums of money. passing a $3110,000 "
, . - bond Issue. Some at the other goy- Those Involved say II often is easier •
•
The association not only has tenacious fundraisers, than members And In Crookston. votes rejected a ernmenta donated land. however. to get donations for arenas than k Is
$1 6- million toed• Issue for a pool to get votes for school bond issues to
are using their ingenuity as wall. This, weekend, a group of volunteers is and ice area In 1975. Ward. Dreshman and Reinhardt Inc„ build arenas. There are many rea-
journeying to Chicago to pug the refrigeration equipment and mterwr fund raisers from Worthingtoa. Ohio, sons:
from a defunct, five •year old suburban arena. The refrigeration "I just decided, 'Lees quit talking— directed each fund drive. The firm
equipment is being donated by a Madison. Wis,. meatpacker and tho Let's do something. " said Joa also led less successful drives In • Donations are deductable on In-
total cost of the equipment is expected to come in around $20,000, French, a load fertilizer manufac- Willmar and Eden Prairie; when come taxes. School bonds Increase
rather than anywhere from eight to 12 tunes that amount. Curer. French and a committee ap- those efforts fallen, the clues passed taxes. •
pealed to Crookstosl 9.000 residents referendums to build arenas. A drive
We commend this organization for its efforts. They are attempting during a Iwo-month campaign In In Shakopee so far has raised about Arenas continued on page 50
' to create a facility which they strongly believe . will be for the betterment
of the community• • Donations usually are made by During Thal visit, the resident asked and Shakopee. He said that when
citizens who use toe arena or who for the donation, Sharp said. larger donors contribute, smaller do-
. believe it will benefit the comment- ears usually follow.
ly. A school bond taxes users of the "11 wouldn't be effective from me,"
ICS Wens help arena and nonusers alike. said Sharp. who speaks with a soft Alter big benefactors were op•
drawl and was well liked in Alexair proached, persistein, well.organized
1 ant sure most people are It would be very easy le alt back • Under the plan developed by the drta, often being Invited to dinner at committees contacted other pften•
aware that a committee of area - now and ay, " Shakopee didn't Ohio fund raisers, neighbors appeal the country club and In residents' Ilal donors. In Hutchinson. 166 peo-
citizens is working very hard help us, , why should we help to potential donors for money. homes. "We're outsiders. We come ple pledged amounts from SS to
toward the goal of funding • Scott • them?" Neighbors seldom appeal to voters to In fora short period and we're gone *75,000, .
County Indoor The Arena In Shako- ` Hey, people, Use costs are going support a school bond. These people live here. They're go-
pee. 0 • up very fast. I think we all agree• ins to be using the facility." Ward. Dreshman and Reinhardt uw•
we need a faculty such as Me In • Donated arenas frequently cost ally charged less than 5 percent of
The project must be funded by Scott County. The time to do less than those built through school The appeal for money specified that the money donated, plus expenses.
private pledge donations by lndl• bonds because bonds often Include the arena would help local people. In
something about it la sew. A wall
victuals and businesses When It Ls money for other projects. Hutchinson. nor example, arena "The more 1 talk about tt the more
and see attitude is a guarantee of a
completed, It will be turned over boosters stressed that hockey play enthused I get," said Michael Lille-
to the city for operation by them as
failure. Face It, U the Protect does "And 1 have to add something." said ors' travel to distant towns for games haugen. an Alexandria banker who
a municipally operated, and there• not go ahead, no one will come to DuWayne Peterson, en accountant and practices could be unsafe and helped lead the arena drive there.
you to collect your pledge, se all who contributed to the Hutchinson unhealthy. aid Allan Finkle, a fund "Every day I go b Y• ry Y R by the arena. 1 walk
by non•taaed facility. u
you are out Is the stamp It coat you area. "It was tun. We gal to see peo- raiser from Syracux. N.Y. in and it's such a moll. It's a feeling
to mall It In to the Pat Office Box le talk) about one project and not of pride
' The uses and benefits of such s - p talking j p de to see went o community
facility extend far beyond the Ice 200, Shakopee! It It goes ahead, you getting Into so argument It wasn't a "Our high school team was mac- can de it people get behind IL"
hockey Interests and Include such have the option of spreading your matter of not contributing. 11 was a Ing at Litchfield." Bradford said.
activities as family skating, curl- tax deductible contribution out matter of now much." "We'd leave at 10 p.m. Then Inc kids "1 wouldn't want to give any commit. over three years. Most important, would come back and shower, We nity the impression that re's a patsy"
mg, broom ball. indoor tennis, you will have had a part In Ward, Dreshman and Reinhardt had kids W0000 grades were going said Don Peterson, a funeral girec-
archery, concerts, and many. providing a desperately needed helped develop that unity. The firm dawn. 11's 22 m110 00011 way." tor who led the Buffalo arena drive
many more. • facility for our area. has raised more than $3 billion since and is the unsalaried manager of the
As you know, a group of Prior 1906, said Donald R. Hannum, chair- The fund raiser's role In the appeal arena "I've given five years of in-
(Ake' residents worked very hard The time is now, people. Let's man of the board. It raised more was to talk about the arena's cost, tense effort t0 it 1 think there has to
puU together and show our kids
to achieve Juat such a project about than 815 million in 1978. Sharp said. "and about what kind of be somebody willing to do that.
two years ago and tell short of gin we would need from h a he
That they are mania w important to
reaching the goal. Many people . One of the Rpm's fund raisers, J.E. Paler) to have a successful sfl cm• n I can go home on a Saturday ,
than are put differences of
and businesses held up on (heir r slMd Sharp of r Clinton.
Alexandria A andria an add d use
Inds under 11 palgn" nigh ) nde pro use the have had facility. That's
1,000
raised more Thel's
pledges to "see how It was going o
BM 111 t y a ter as t'
before they committed themselves. Brat a Hutchinson, live 5 150 where you Ray your IIfL That's worth
As a sera be of that committee Prier to s Minnesota Lzke visit to s Mlnnrsan tows. ws. s. sOe Sae B0(4 atd pledged 5I999D00 000 of the a 551S.O00 Od more than pay"
who put many hours a( effort Into she had studied Its financial assets raised. —
the Prior Lake Arena, it was a 1 and accompanied a resident to ask
bitter pill to swallow when we i t he fade t poten0al donor fora con. "They establish a pattern of giving •
called It quits. trlbatton• for other people." sold Flak, who
worked in Crookston, Hutchinson
•
• DISTRICT OFFICES 1/a.,
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 720
505 SOUTH HOLMES
DR. WARREN HALLGREN, Chairperson SCOTT COUNTY
DR. ROBERT MAYER
JOHN GOIHL, Vice - Chairperson SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 Superintendent of Schools
MARCIA SPAGNOLO, Clerk TELEPHONE: 445 -4884 VIRGIL S. MEARS
FRANCIS KREUSER, Treasurer
WILLIAM CHALMERS, Director
Assistant Superintendent
GARY PEARSON, Director
ROBERT MARTIN
JAMES STILLMAN, Director Business Manager
January 28, 1980
.
Mr. Clint Hammer •
1308 West Sixth Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Hammer:
•
The Shakopee Senior High School hockey team has been forced
to travel to LeSueur for practice on indoor ice and for all of its
home games. This has been an added expense and has not been a good
use of time.
We are very excited about the possibility of having an arena
available to us in Shakopee. It should be a definite asset to our
hockey program.
Please be assured that we will use the arena for our home games
and for some practice when it becomes available.
I would•like to thank you and others who have denoted so much
time to making the arena a reality.
•
Sincerely yours,
04„),,incih
Robert Mayer -
Superintendent of Schools
RM: gar
•
•
•
•
•
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
January 31, 1980
Chuck Kreuser
959 Apgar
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
•
Shakopee Hockey Association:
It is the'intent of the Chaska IIockey Association and H.S.
to be considered for ice rental from the Shakopee Ice Arena
during the 1980 -81 season.
Our youth program has about 150 to 175 hockey skaters which we
feel should be intitled to 1 hour of indoor ice per skater.
This would commit the Association to 150 to 175 hours of indoor
ice rental, plus another 80 hours for the high school practice.
We in the Chaska hockey program (parents, friends, and fans) are
in need of your arena.
Thank you.
Chaska IIockey Association
:
PRIOR LAKE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION
P. O. BOX 92
PRIOR LAKE. MINNESOTA
58372
January 21, 1980
Mr. Clinton T. Hammer
Shah -O- Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc.
P.O. Box 200
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear Clint,
To confirm previous conversations, Prior Lake Hockey Asso-
ciation stands ready to do all possible to assist you in your
fund raising efforts for the Indoor Ice Arena. Please advise
us of your desires in that direction.
Further, Prior LacLe Hockey Association hereby commits to
the acquisition of 125 hours of market rate ice time, (hours
subject to approval), in the Shakopee Arena between November 1,
1980 and March 15, 1981.
We sincerely hope that we may be of assistance to you and
that our patronage will be of benefit to the Arena. We look
forward to working with you on a long overdue project.
Yours sincerely,
Bill Bissonett
Public Relations Chair.
Prior Lake Hockey Assoc.
447 -3389 (home)
•
447 -6040 (office)
•
BB /ps
•
•
• INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 719
Gateway Center 15870 Franklin Trail
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372
•
•
•
•
January 24, 1980
CY F. KRUSE, ED. D.
Superintendent of Schools
(612) 447 - 2185 Mr. Clinton T. Hammer.
LES C. SONNABEND, PH. D. 1308 West 6th Avenue
Assistant Superintendent Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
(612) 447 -2185
Dear Mr. Hammer:
CARTER A. CHRISTIE
Director of Business Affairs
(612) 447 - 2185 May I express my pleasure and that of the school district
in the acknowledgment that a full -blown effort is being
Made to construct an indoor ice facility in the City of
` Shakopee.
DAN A. DAHLGREN, Principal
Senior High School At the present time, the Prior Lake Public Schools drive
15860 Fish Point Road S.E. . unusually long distances in order to secure indoor ice
(612) 447 - 4131 time for hockey programs. We would like to let you know
JOHN D. KALTON, Principal on this early occasion, that should the construction of
Junior High School an ice facility in Shakopee actually occur, that the Prior
5061 Minnesota Street S.E. Lake Public Schools would be interested in obtaining hours
(612) 447 - 2188 for the use of the school's hockey programs at competitive
RONALD E. MACHACEK, Principal rates and times. •
Five Hawks Elementary
16620 Five Hawks Avenue We will be most happy to see the completion of the project
(612) 447 -4139 in Shakopee.
DARWIN A. FOSSE, Principal My best wishes.
WestWood Elementary
5370 Eveleth Avenue S.E.
(612) 447 -2178 Sincerely,
Cy F. KrUse, Ed.D.
Superintendent of Schools
CFK:ojr
c.c. Dan A. Dahlgren, High School Principal
• Jennings Mayer, Athletic Director
Les Sonnabend, Assistant Superintendent
Bill Bissonett •
} WILLIAM D. SCHOELL / /4°I
CARLISLE MADSON
JACK T. VOSLER
JAMES R. ORR 3
HAROLD E. DAHLIN a"
LARRY L. HANSON -•' *• a SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
JACK E. GILL _ :w,•x"
RODNEYB. GORDON { � :14r ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS
THEODORE D. KEMNA
JOHN W. EMOND
KENNETH E. ADOLF
WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT (6121 938 -7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343
BRUCE C. SUNDING
R. SCOTT HARRI OFFICES AT HURON, SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS
DENNIS W. SAARI •
GERALD L. BACKMAN
February 4, 1980
City of Shakopee
c/o Mr. H. R. Spurrier,
City Engineer
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Subject: 1,500,000 Gallon Elevated Tank
Improvement Project No. 79 -9
Gentlemen:
Herewith are eight (8) copies of Contract Amendment No. 2
for the subject project. This Amendment adds the watermain
connection between the elevated tank and the existing 18 -inch
watermain stub north of the tank.
This amendment adds $7,605.00 to the contract to yield •
a revised contract amount of $986,805.00. Please review and
sign all copies, return three copies to our office and retain
the remaining five copies for your records.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Very truly yours,
SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
KEAdolf:mkr 01
•
enclosures •
cc: Mr. Lou Van Hout
•
•
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 DATED January 28, 1980
PROJECT NAME 1,500,000 Gallon Elevated Tank
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE ADDED OR DELETED:
Addition of the watermain connection between the elevated tank and the existing
18 -inch watermain stub north of the tank.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 979,200.00
CHANGE ORDER(S) NO. 1 THRU NO. 2 (ADD) $ 7,605.00
TOTAL FUNDS ENCUMBERED $ 986,805.00
The above described work shall be added to the Contract under the same conditions
specified in the original Contract unless otherwise specified herein. Any work
not so specified shall be performed in accordance with the Standard Specifications
adopted by the City of Shakopee. The number of days for completion shall be
increased by (no change) consecutive calendar days to a total of
consecutive calendar days.
I hereby agree to perform the work specified in this change order in accordance
with the specifications, conditions and prices specified above.
CONTRACTOR: Pittsburgh -Des Moines Steel Company
BY: Avi. l r �it7404-:%
TITLE: CONTRACTING ENGINEER
DATE: /=.3,/-
APPROVED AND RECOMMENDED:
ENGINEER: Schoell / & Madson, Inc. _
BY: Ut , c.Pi� DATE: aZ 9'D
Kenneth Adolf
APPROVED:
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
• , DATE:
iliti s Manager
, DATE:
City Engineer .
BY: ` , DATE:
Mayor
, DATE: _
Administrator •
M• �
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
mf
INCORPORATED 11170 •
129 E. First Ave., Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445 -3650 @r
)j(1
January 30, 1980
Mr. Brooks Hauser
Scottland, Inc.
P.O. Box 272
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Mr. Hauser:
This letter is to, again, call your attention to the hearing
scheduled to be held by the Shakopee City Council on February 5th,
at 10:00 P.M. The purpose of this hearing will be the following:
1. For the City Council to determine if the violation
of a law relating to the sale of beer was a willful
violation. If the determination is that the violation
• was willful, then the City Council has no choice but
to revoke the liquor license.
2. If the City Council determines that the violation
was not willful, then the City Council must determine
if they wish to revoke the license or suspend the
license for a period not to exceed 60 days.
•
The City Council considers violations of this type to be
very serious matters and I must inform you that in discussion
with the Police Chief, of the facts involved in this case, it is
my opinion that the City Council, will have a difficult time finding
that the violation of the liquor law was not willful and therefore,
the revocation'of your license is a very possible outcome of this
hearing.
The Heart of Pro Valle
An Equal opportunity Employer
l v
Mr. Brooks Hauser
January 30, 1980 -2-
I would suggest to you that you should have a representative
at the hearing to present your side of the incident and that you
should plan on attending the hearing yourself.
Attached, for your information, is a copy of the City Code
that relates to this hearing.
S �cerely,
i
Dougla S. Reeder
City Administrator
DSR /ljw
'Attachment
cc: Shakopee Police Chief
Shakopee City Attorney
Shakopee City Council
•