Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 25, 1980 TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ.REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MARCH 25, 1980 Mayor Harbeck presiding. 1] Roll Call at 7 :30 P.M. 2] 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Application for 8400,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds by Shak -0 - Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc. 3] Res. No. 1586, Ordering Improvement & Preparation of Plans -- 80-1 Sanitary Sewer Laterals in Hauer's area, 8- 115 -22. 4] Employee Energy Saving Award 5] Discussion of easements for Upper Valley Sewer Interceptor (formerly V.I.P. Trunk Sanitary Sewer) 6] Holmes Street Reconstruction Project - - discussion. 7] Priorities 8] Other Business 9] Adjourn. DOUGLAS S. REEDi CITY ADMINISTRATOR • INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS OUTSTANDING • Preliminary Date of Expiration Firm Approval Issuance Amount of Bonds Valley Park, Inc. Series 1976 $ 1,000,000 1/1/86 (Valleyfair) Toro Series 1975 $ 2,100,000 1.1Mil 8/15/E 1.OMil 8/15/5 Certain Teed Series 1973 $ 1,000,000 4/1/85 Perkins Steak & Cake Feb.of 1980 $ 600,000 Ziegler, Inc. Dec.of 1979 $ 2,500,000 Scottland Warehouse Feb.of 1980 $ 1,000,000 K -Mart Store Dec.of 1979 $ 1,000,000 Ashland Oil Feb. 5,1980 $ 1,000,000, J & B Enterprises Feb. 19, 1980 $ 950,000 North Central Distr. $ 1,500,000 Shak -O- Valley Amateur $ 400,000 Hockey, Inc. Progress Valley Park $ 1,600,000 (3 warehouses) Citizens Bank Bldg.Co. $ 900,000 MEMO TO: Douglas Si. Reeder, City Administrator FROM: , Jeanne Andre, Administrative Assistant RE: Employee Energy Savings Suggestions DATE: March 21, 1980 Attached is a draft of the suggested format for the Employee Energy Savings Suggestion Program. I suggest that you review this plan and take the steps necessary for implementation. JE /jsc • • CITY OF SHAKOPEE Energy Savings Suggestions The City of Shakopee wants to encourage its employees to review their work and the work environment to discover potential means of saving energy. To this end a special cash award has been instituted to reward employees for their creativity in developing energy- saving ideas and initiative in bringing the ideas to imple- mentation. Department Heads will not be eligible to receive this award. The procedure to be followed to earn the Energy Award is outlined below: 1. Submit idea on Employees Energy Saving Suggestion Form to the City Administrator at Shakopee City Hall, ,129 East 1st Avenue. 2. City Administrator will review suggestions for basic feasibility. Within three weeks of receipt the Administrator will evaluate the suggestion as either: a) unfeasible; and b) to be further reviewed for feasibility by appropriate staff member. The employee will be • informed by letter of the Administrator's determination. If the suggestion is to be further reviewed, the Administrator will forward the suggestion to the employee's supervisor or person in charge of the division to be affected by the suggestion. 3. The employee will meet with the person charged with reviewing the suggestion to discuss possible implement- ation of the suggestion. Within one month, following •this meeting, the reviewer will submit a written report indicating the feasibility of the suggestion, the reviewer's estimation of potential savings, and the procedure to be used if implementation is recommended. If further feasibility studies are necessary, the reviewer will arrange for the studies to be undertaken and indicate when a final determination is expected to be made. A copy of the reviewer's report will be forwarded to the employee who submitted the suggestion. 4. If the suggestion is recommended for implementation, by the reviewer, it should be implemented within six months. When the suggestion has been in effect for at least three months, an evaluation will be made to determine if a minimum threshold of energy savings has been realized. The employee will receive a copy of this evaluation, and if the minimum threshold of energy savings is reached, will be granted a cash award. • riergy Savings Suggestions Page -2- F 5. Approximately once each year all suggestions which have.reached implementation and satisfied a minimum threshold of energy savings will be considered for an "Annual Energy Super- Savers Award ". The City Administrator will select a committee to review all eligible suggestions and determine which suggestion is most worthy of further recognition. .6. Each award will be $50.00 for successful suggestions, with $500.00, to be awarded as the Super Savers Award. A suggestion will be deemed successful if it achieves a minimum threshold of energy savings of $200.00, per ' year. • • draft 3/18/80 IUK OFFICE USE ONLY C • • Suggestion No. Received- Admin. • Received -Rev. Review Report Implemented Award Request CITY OF SHAKOPEE Award Granted Considered for SA EMPLOYEE ENERGY SAVINGS SUGGESTION Name of Suggestor: Last First Middle Initial Social Security Number: - Date Submitted: Home Address: Street City State Zip Position (title): Department: SUBJECT OF IDEA • Present Condition, Method, Procedure • Suggested Improvement • • Type and Scope of Anticipated Savings •'Anticipated Cost of Implementing Improvement • Attach additonal sheets if necessary to explain any section completely., • COMMENTS FROM HOLMES STREET MEETING MARCH 19, 1980 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL AUDITORIUM 1. Allan Schroeder, 936 Holmes — Will Holmes Street be widened; what interest rate will be charged to property owners? 2. Joe Marschall, 533 Pierce — Was assessed for west side storm sewer and asked why he is being assessed again. 3. Gary Mortensen, 428 West 2nd — Asked if the trunk sewer does benefit everyone. 4. Eunice Schaefer, 118 East 6th — Asked how the new street was going to affect the level of the street. 5. Dr. Joe Huber, 845 Holmes — What type of curb is going to be used. Concerned with being able to open car door. 6. Floyd Engelen, 820 Atwood — Asked why the recommendation to pay for the improvements is this way. He paid for his own sanitary sewer. Who pays the taxes, who pays the sewer bills; he is going to end up paying more for this project, than people on Holmes Street! Clean the manholes out; streets cost more than other projects; not necessary now; can't see flooding; why business district cut off; the water is more beneficial to •the downtown area; storm sewer too expensive. 7. F. F. (Doug) Schneider, 127 West 4th — From 2nd going North on Holmes, there was a storm sewer enlarged in 1956, is this going to be eliminated now. 8. David Hart, 942 Clay — Asked if there was sufficient funds in the sewer fund to pay for the costs; if not how much would the rates be increased and for how ling. 9. Lawrence Geis, 918 Holmes — Questioned why the watermain beyond 7th was not going to be replaced. 10. ( ? ?? ) Land is porous; what does the City plan to do now. Ans. increase the grade to get the water out. 11. Ray Siebenaler, Chrm. of Committee, 119 W 4th — Asked what would be done if the City can't bond for the improvements. 12. Florence Miles, 1039 Atwood — Asked what the cost per lot would be for the storm sewer. 13. Bob Rademacher, 809 Lewis — What streets are draining to Holmes. 14. Cal Brown, 956 Holmes — Asked why the residents on Holmes St. should be penalized by the closing of Holmes street (if it is not improved), when the job should have been done earlier. 15. Emil Halden, 206 West 3rd — What is the trunk storm sewer going to do for him; he floods every rain; have to pay for a trunk now then again later to get rid of the water; Fuller has defect in pavement; proposes remainder of system (laterals) be done in near future to complete the project. 16. Marjorie Lucarelli, 961 Fuller — Will the gullies remain at the Church at 8th and Fuller 17. Clair Van Maldeghem, 930 Holmes — Asked how long service to homes would be interrupted. 18. Leo Thomas, 934 Lewis — If Holmes Street is closed and people have to use Lewis, who is going to replace Lewis when necessary? Post the roads to load limit. ... But will the City enforce!!! • • r -- 2 — 19. Unidentified gentleman -- The trunk is estimated to cost one —half million; when the laterals are constructed and connected, what is the total cost. 20. Irene Hunziker, 701 Holmes — How long will Holmes Street be torn up. 21. Leo Thomas, 934 Lewis — questioned the $0.04 estimate without bids in yet. 22. Madge Olson, 940 Holmes — Why was it determined that a sidewalk would be installed between Shakopee Avenue and 10th. Signed a petition against the sidewalk. 23. Ron Weiler, Member of Committee, 921 Holmes — asked that it be entered into the minutes of this meeting that the Committee concurs that the sidewalk between Shakopee Avenue and 10th Avenue not be built. 24. Unidentified gentleman — Commended the recommendation that the road be put in after the utilities are installed. 25. Floyd Engelen, 820 Atwood — What are you going to do if you don't put in the street; where is money coming from; not giving honest answers to questions; sewer costs will go up; a 10% error in the estimate is $100,000. No assessments are proposed now, when the sewer fund is broke, then we'll go back to assessing. 26. Gary Voiding, 1044 Fuller — stated that it is not fair to criticize the Committee now after the fact. The Committee is basing their findings after much research. One should find out more information before being critical. 27. Drainage problem at 5th and Pierce and at 620 Pierce W. 28. Leon Hartman, 728 Scott — State Aid picking up costs; thought they paid only a percentage. • 29. Bernard Bauman, 858 Holmes — Concerned that there is no watermain proposed past 5th, because of the breakages in the area. 30. Leo Thomas, 934 Lewis — Unaware of the Holmes Street Ad Hoc Committee, or that it was looking for input from citizens; never contacted; not aware of project until recently. 31. Alfred Geis, 904 Holmes — What are you going to do with manhole; he is not connected to Holmes Street; wants a line to the main sewer. 32. Mrs. Rusch, 939 Holmes — How much land will be taken to build sidewalk. Ans. sidewalk will remain within the right—of—way. 33. Mona Strunk, 103 East 3rd — please don't have meetings on Wednesdays during lent, there are church services. 34. Larry Geis, 918 Holmes — Put sidewalk on Holmes So. of Shakopee Ave. on the West and have City plow it. 35. Dr. Joe Huber, 845 Holmes — Are you going to drop the intersections a foot and a half, clarify. 36. Al -Hanson, 534 S. Holmes — doesn't want to loose maple trees, concerned with floods. 37. Jim Lodermeier, 217 W. Shakopee Ave & property on Apgar — concerned that if we wait on this project until the interest rates come down, that what we save in interest will be lost in increased costs, because of putting the project off. * * f.