HomeMy WebLinkAboutApril 01, 1980 •
TENTATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR SESSION • SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APRIL 1, 1980
Mayor Harbeck presiding.
1] Roll Call and Invocation at 7 :30 P.M.
2] Approval of Minutes of March 4th, 5th, and 11th, 1980
3] Communications:
a] Allan Moen, request for street light
b] Mn. Energy Agency, re gasoline emergency conservation plan
4] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers:
a] Cncl.Col7igan from the Fire Dep't; Jt. Seven Man Committee & Planning Comm.
c 1 Cncl.Hullander from Scott County Criminal Justice Advisory Comm.
• Cncl.Lebens from the Community Services Board
d Cncl.Leroux from the Shakopee School Board
e Cncl.Reinke from the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
f Mayor Harbeck from Scott County Board of Commissioners
5] RECOGNITION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANYONE PRESENT IN THE AUDIENCE WHO DESIRES
TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA
6] Old Business:
a] Appointment to Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
• 7] Planning Commission Recommendations:
a] Final Plat of Macey 2nd Addition, consisting of 4.5 + acres, lying
W of Dakota, S of 4th, E of Market and N of the RR tracks
Applicant: Shakopee H.R.A.
o
Action: Resolution No. 1585
Planning Comm. Recommendation: City Admr. will report
8] Routine Resolutions and Ordinances:
a] Res. No. 1564, Setting Fees for City Services
b] Res. loo. 1589, Establishing A Policy for the City of Shakopee Concerning
City Plats Which Do Not Have Municipal Sewer and Water
1 Res. No. 1599, Authorizing Leasing of City Property
Res. No. 15 , Establishing A Reconstruction Policy for the City of
Shakopee
e] Res. No. 1592, Authorizing Condemnation Proceedings
i
9] New Business:
a] Award bids for improvements in Macey 2nd and 79 -2 Fourth Ave. Watermain
c 1 Award bids for Tandem Cab /Chassis for Fire Department
8 :30 P.M,, PUBLIC HEARING - Request for the vacation of the alley between
3rd and 4th Avenues and between Prairie and Naumkeag Streets
d Approve probation increase for City employees
e Authorize hiring of cleaning ladies .
f P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Holmes Street Reconstruction Improvement
--- Res. No. 1 93, Ordering Improvement & Preparation of Plans & Specs
g] Authorizing accepting proposals for Engineering Services for Infiltration
Inflow Assessment
h] City Engineer's status report on public improvements
i] : 0 P.M. - Application for On Sale & Sunday Intoxicating Liquor
censes by Garcia's Inn Inc.
j] 9 :45 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Application for $1,600,000 Industrial Revenue
Bonds by Progress Valley Park
k 1980 Sewer Fund Budget - Res. No. 1594, Setting Sewer Service Rates
•
1 Landscape quotations for area around Public Works Building
m] 10 :00 HEARING ON REVOCATION OR SUSPENSION OF CLUB LIQUOR LICENSE - Shakopee
American Legion Club
10] Consent Business:
11] Other Business:
12] Adjourn to Tuesday, April . . .
Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
- . .. ..r._._.M_ .. ....., . _. �. _■,.
/
4�/��
'' ' V
. �~`
��' '^`' -
�=0�u
0�� B��& � �- � �� �=" 0�y
� m��v�� �^m rx =��=
MAR 2 1 1980
_ .fn.wl ^) ^ _________�____ __ ---�------ ---------------- _-- ---_'
/7 a C. SifiaoPii, 4 _________ c]nt OF SHAKOPEE
PFC ./21 , ��._
` ~
.
'-------____-_ 0�^++^-�-.~u�_�A
' - _- _- _-
---' ----- ' °- - `-' ' ---~ - ---^----- -------- --'�- �' �---- - ---� --�---� -- ---
.
4�v_-~~���� ^o~~-_����� �� -_'
--` ~--_ --'���'-- ���
--- -----��-��— �--
° �
»�q� �/~�~��t ���^�� 40 ��°_~��—`
- e:_ e:_ r aet- ,e6 Q-+- 0 *x _--___--__-
��
___ ���_ ��^v� - � ��--.���wr�^-c w� �-.��=~^_'c��~��-z
�
•�e
- .
^ .
~�7
- -���«�~�-�� ~~�^�"
�
~�c4e.z .2mo-t
� . '
. �
„_-=~'.~-~ ._ _ -_-__
.
' v
L” (4_, 0-1 GAL_ __ __ '
■14
- . .
�
_-_-_ "_~_-~_-_�-_�,' ~---_ __- _ _ _ -42.41 _ _ _--
_-22+a x.-et ---=��rz�v*!_
_-_-_ - __-__
�� '
'^^�v'_ _-__�� __' - _ -------------�--
rup
�4y S 66
4�., �•iC I V
. r
MAR 2 1 1980
�rN N E
MINNESOTA ENERGY AGENCY CITY aditWiCASE
980 AMERICAN CENTER BUILDING
150 EAST KELLOGG BOULEVARD
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
March 19, 1980
Mayor Walt C. Harbeck
City of Shakopee
129 E. First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 5537
Dear Mayor Har. ck :. b i
Thank you for writing to express your views regarding
the possible measures that might be included in the state
standby gasoline emergency conservation plan. All comments
and suggestions are being considered. Each possible measure
will be analyzed to determine its effectiveness in saving
gasoline and its potential impact on the state's economy
and on every sector of society.
Public meetings will be held this spring to provide
interested individuals and groups an additional opportunity
- to voice their'opinions. A list of the dates and locations
of these meetings is enclosed.
Again, thank you for taking an active part in helping
to develop a comprehensive and equitable gasoline con -
seration plan for Minnesota.
Sincerely,
0 1144/L
es H. Main
ing Director
JHM:mb
Enclosure
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Pc.
•
•
•
•
PUBLIC MEETINGS •
STATE EMERGENCY GASOLINE CONSERVATION PLAN
DATES, TIMES AND LOCATIONS •
CONGRESSIONAL •
DISTRICT TIME AND DATE LOCATION
1 7:00 p.m. Wednesday April 23 Room S 110 •
Science Building
• Rochester Community College .
Rochester, Minnesota
2 7:00 p.m. Thursday April 24 Room C 121
Trafton Science Center •
Mankato State University
Mankato, Minnesota
3 7:00 p.m. Tuesday April 29 Cafeteria •
Eisenhower High School
• Hopkins, Minnesota
4 1:00 p.m. Room 83
and 7:00 p.m. Wednesday April 30 State Office Building
St. Paul, Minnesota
5 7:00 p.m. Thursday May 1 Auditorium Level A
Hennepin Co. Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota
6 7:00 p.m. Monday May 5 Room L 10 •
Library Building
Willmar Community College
Willmar, Minnesota
7 7:00 p.m. Tuesday May 6 Commissioners Hearing Room
Becker Co. Courthouse
Detroit Lakes, Minnesota .
8 7:00 p.m. Wednesday May 7 Central Lecture Hall
Duluth AVTI
Duluth, Minnesota
•
•
•
•
•
g6
1. Resolution No. 1589
j. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A POLICY
I FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE CONCERNING CITY PLATS
••WHICH DO NOT HAVE MUNICIPAL SEWER AND WATER
4 -
WHEREAS, The Shakopee City Council is responsible for
"''' - the'. Health ;and Welfare of Shakopee residents • and
• . 'WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Council wishes to encourage
•. the.development of residential areas which have full City services
and which'will, therefore, not require the future installation
f'
of additional public utilities; and
.WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee has invested large sums of
public money in the construction of water and sewer utilities
in areas where development is appropriate and timely; and
WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Council does not find that the
•
development of residential areas which do not have full City
ser is in the best interest of the City; and
WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Council wishes to use the limited
bonding capacity of the City for the most appropriate public
purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL
OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, does hereby adopt the following policy
for the City of Shakopee:
The.City of Shakopee will not sell. General Obligation
Bonds for the purpose of financing the construction of
residential subdivisions unless the residential units
.in,.the subdivision are served by municipal water and
sewer.
•
Adopted in — session of the Shakopee
•
City Council of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
April, 1980.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Approved as to form this
day of ' , 1980
.City Clerk
City Attorney
Resolution No. 1590
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LEASING OF CITY PROPERTY
•
.
+ WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee owns certain properties,
and;
WHEREAS, certain parcels are not currently utilized for
City functions.
• NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE-CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Administrator
are authorized to enter into a one -year lease with Norbert Theis
t `
for the sum of $720.00, for the following property:
18 acres in the NW4 SW4 Section 12 Township 115 Range 23
•Adopted in session of the City
Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this _ day
of , 1980.
0
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
•
•
ATTEST:
• • •City.Clerk •
'Approved.as form this
day of , 1980.
City Attorney
•
i t'
•
•
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Easement on Property of Ed Siebenaler for
Construction of Minnesota Street Watermain
DATE: March 27, 1980
On March 26, 1980, I met with Mr. Siebenaler to discuss the
acquisition of the above listed easement. We discussed the
possibility of cost - sharing between Mr. Siebenaler and the
Neighborhood Revitalization Project based on the shared
benefit each will enjoy through construction of the watermain.
Mr. Siebenaler indicated he is opposed to assuming any cost
of the watermain construction, and will exercise his right
to force the City into condemnation proceedings to acquire
the easement. I, therefore, recommend that the City adopt
Resolution No. 1592, authorizing Condemnation Proceedings,
to acquire the easement necessary to construct the watermain
on Minnesota Street between the Railroad and 7th Avenue.
JA /jiw
0
a '
MEMO TO: Douglas S., Reeder
City Administrator
FROM: Gregg M. Voxland
Finance Director
RE: Tandem Cab /Chassis Bids
DATE: March 26, 1980
Attached is the bid tabulation for the March 24, 1980,
opening of bids for the Fire Department Tanker. The bid
from Superior Ford comes the closest to meeting the
specifications. The only deviation being that silicone
hoses were noted as "not available - diesel only ".
Recommend the bid be awarded to Superior Ford in the amount
of $19,788.00.
• GMV /jiw
Attachment
•
•
•
•
fr •
CITY OF SHAKOPEE - ,
BID TABULATION SHEET
• • Tesdall Ton Edge -`Superior Waconia
Motors Ford Ford Ford /Mercury
NAME
MAKE Ford LT 800 Ford LT 800 Ford LT 800 Ford LT 800
. j
r {
I
DELIVERY I 45/90 days 1 90 days 90 days 60/150 days I
1 1
I
Base
a 1 NEE BID $19,985 1 $19,917 $19,788 $19,617
f
i . i
I 1
i ALTERNATE BID;
1
DEVIATIONS Single plate 68 Amp Silicone Air horns • clutch battery hoses Silicone hoses
68 Amp batters Silicone Rear axle
hose
•
q
MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator •
FROM: Tim Keane, City Planner
RE: Alley Vacation Between 3rd and 4th, Prairie and
Naumkeag, Block 27
DATE: March 27, 1980
Attached is a petition from Cletus Link for the vacation of
an alley at the above referenced location. At the present,
the alley is not constructed. There is a local power line
running along the north side of the alley. If the alley is
vacated as a public right -of -way, it should be maintained
as a utility easement. The existing homes on 4th Avenue
have access directly to, 4th Avenue and Prairie Street. The
house on Lot 10 (northwest corner of the block) has a garage
located in the middle of the present alley right -of -way. If
the alley is vacated, the status of this garage would remain
as a non - conforming structure.
The Council considered this petition at their March 4th
meeting. At that time, the City Attorney indicated that the
City had long since surrendered rights to the alley and that
the present alley vacation is a formality.
Staff recommends vacation of the alley between 3rd and 4th,
and Prairie and Naumkeag; Block 27.
TK /jiw
Attdthment
S r Ir r g n'
i)A ..... ____mt.... i ' ": _„-..-_--- - -- - .--..''
a
\ _ ...._,,,,,,..,...,. - '-'''[.'". ;," ,,:, .1 k S I 1 A K 0 1 • . '.. (' (\V ** ,.:, 7 / _. _ _ _ -__--.,-.-J_ . .
1rVF611 01{ "ICI _ I.- t, 1(1
/ _ _I.2_ ' ail r
-
i tj . 4 r_1 � , t , 1 --�, �
• e _ CID 6 0a— AV ov 1 - E � r " If
00_,_.
�0 ��0 W L[L �� `\ ® �10�1 � _ w Y SII AI 7PEE n n �4'I � l w _ - �� ' � f ' � �� \ I _, .,
�I � � � 1�,, s tt Y
� AVE
a � } L \ 12 sr. SHAKUPEE \\\ i . _i--
L
_ 1 , ), .
_ ,
? .;.... 7 ��
5---"---. � i NORTHERN
-4S � OM- -m Ibex j �
____L____ _ _____
1 1
cr
u 1
m
13 ° 1
..—__ � 1ri I i
_1 t t; 1 I hh
a T t r ' I9I
CO RD 76 cL . •
= , ELLYN AUU 1 f
a 1 1 1 I -
U _
s
C` `
e'
- -= 1.--i tie---- /-��_ Y � - D, 4
By
'ETITIONER `DAT
Ar '' W .1E- * RAvvMK
Z000'
ASE NO. LOT LOCATION . SCALE P G, •
• ,1 • •
_ 1e- �„'''''-•:C42..:1--:-...•::**.*:- + r � W,,,wII = > � _,, . .t Al � 1 ' Y } s „ a .3 • r Y p . '� -r '
GG - .. r t r '' p - +f. , � l . , . 1 t L q.•„ I ti a '
,x.
t " d• • ' ▪ 2 1 Z . C '' " y
"' 114 vc r , " ,A;4 ' , ,ri. d , TC A - -- � - - `""— t , - • . t �' , jam °
• { 4.
• i._''
'� .1J•Cj s,F ' S ..�f a ✓ •••;••• yr'Fr,TI� ' 1 �' �t
} v
Jr ., ", • k... J t� 1 r# ' :}a, Y _ . , •�`- .:r + _ •
r .f- '1C , �.{ ; yy , . '. z ,
� 4. ;, 43 *. ''' ' '''.
r ' ' •; I • I r t 4 ' „` � 1 l ' ' • < �
" ' v` '
� ♦ r1t v t r .1r; ' i ,� ` ; y , ' t....... Ili • ' ! s .:: *' '' J' f .�` f; ° , of . , .
P � r Ji t r • T! „ � t 'QJ' �.. ,, .. 1. 4 . y _ II'''.
y
1 :' e, S c. Z .rr` { r . x i •si- r i •
•"OI • • V r T } ' r 1 e ' 11 ,! C ♦ - r S !. y . i a,aJrP .1 ,, . - } j: t
` . > . • f" A 4. " f • � . , -• 1 �. ° ..., . . t ., •t t ..v v. ...,..+'
1 rs.yJ'' ' .,r .,_ F x } , .iv1 ; s . , C' y h '' ` -r 1
' ` 1 1 '' , A • ` L t . t ' `Iq,.� �. ; ic ., � t 2 1 ,- 1,,,.. S .! r {i{ r r ✓ a. • , . ...t..., - ..•-
• °w.c'' : :41.. " :.0 , � . i7 ,,,:y t, u * t - ti ., . -11 f ^ ,r a _ • !. ., 'I'3,';',.
}1'.!f ' " •
• et-"' • . : " r { , t;1 ,...,:..)..,,,,,,.. 1 ..„..,;:„.,.....,,..,,.....,...".-
:...,. , .t;,"' 4.. ' i-24:-Lti,.. ;: ,...*;` - 4- - / l':,:= ; *-.
to. . "•'''-.',;.,
11° . : y �� 1+ti�, c l':: a 1 {y . , �'! " r A •,r M .. + �!',r`x � .rV • '~ r �
�YOR ''"� ,+€ f:�s t " y t 1 1 " �� A .,.e t t s yy� ' ti T , � .q
I , t :. { i���i�. A l + 0 r t ,y Y f Z ! .c • :. t A } v^'] ) 1
y f
Y Ni ' w� t x " ro t �' ;C \'Y' a r " � ti , '► rr ^ i a ^' .* " ' i - A 4 a
. , f0 , ie1 , ; 7 r ''Ir b+y^ * ,...i-:<'•: t � , ' y ,-0 : 1.
1G �i '4:4,4;2 . 'S• C tr 4 s ti ^d•. f r� 1 '�.•le
11• 1 w• 'c A. ,k,! .D.r. r t „ f. l r } , 3 1 ` ti
,,„
h3 Y 4∎ >. ;."%+), 1`1 IV,,, '.1 Y $ . 'S. 5 ' � =a !. a 7 , - I `
t \%'
` i I ' ' ? ' } t. ' , f - `-.i. ° f,.+.•. M ■
� c• ▪ . , )at,. 1J � s t : r
t 19 .1 'c .s..r.� `` 1 7 . w (” Y `h ,_ F�r� C r : t ' . - '
-,e'''''''""-.:15,,,,,,, j J.:�+
� • "�J •S , P b� r s ,,� . w ,�� `3 ti� 1. ¢' , , y / r � ? � • *1'3' ,. •• ^•+ ,� .41. _
i s p sG ‘3.:,',1.44,;4i(3-;1•1"37.4%.., � � t Y) E, }lr a ,..`i d _ d — � 1 r.' t ;r• - • I lly. : z ° M .. V S J 1 4 ; , ,...---77—„,,, - • ri '4., . - + . e?. _ - ..—
) -
•
tr
c • ':. '0,.; .. OY +•�1,, 3
rya i •Y *,~" Z' to NF • �" i 1 .. •
a , I �'�.
,Ri ;t1lii Fr�'i �.+ s 1'fe �
' J «r►; ..1 `'i .. �f{
• t,
'.. .•••••,I= F , Y ' •L�i. Ot'! 4 7? wA• •K ` e "-re, ... •
X 7 .3< t. *F y ' y .4 � ✓ ' ; t. t ° + /�W .r , •
ill; [' _ . :,;� } 1.,Y " C ill ., i -t.
` .• f «.a7 .1- ti+1o.+F i- • 'Q«:w..l.� «∎.M alai -* .J�ii .
/ 1
/� -q • I 80
'ETITIONER /`��' ��t 3 DATE
•
• MP 4z t tr 4.. NUMc,
loo '
•
-ASE NO. S LOT LOCATION SCALE ) •-..
._. _. ..._ . _ .. ...............:�___..:... .. ,.,...... _........... J.....: a: ......:...rw:,.saati . 7t: :_. e:-�.
1 ,
. 1
1 PETITION FOR STREET OR ALLEY VACATION
DATE , -, �,../--l-.i ( 5)(,) gC1
(.7
We the undersigned, owners of the following described real
property, abutting on the street or alley in question, hereby
petition the Gity Council of the City of Shakopee to vacate the
following (Street) (Alley): ( (/1— -
lying, between „2-,.--x a / IAve., and between
i d�� u.• • �Ji ..--2-\.-1 �. �= 1�+.1! / il S t . *.Y_'l.. .
• PE'� TI ER LOT BLOCK
6 i—d/ .. _.�,� .�� , �.-,;— / 2 *7
i P , - , / _C. • / -,
` ` •� : �� ,/. t . .� ?' P - - -- . .7
f) I- 7 ! s !� �tp21o�1 Lc)rce$ 7
�- ,4 /,�1I� � � 4 7 7
' 0,
, f I I' . oz g,e..,,ezy.z & i,
I hereby verify that I circulated the above petition and that
the above signatures of the property owners and petitioners were
affixed in my presence.
n h ( p _ ,;;--_,./)
4
` Zirculator f (
Approved this day of , 19 .
City Attorney
e
•
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given to the affected property owners
and the public that the City Council of the City of Shakopee
will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, April 1, 1980. at
8:30 P.M., or thereafter in the Council Chambers of the City
Hall at 129 East First Avenue, to consider the vacation of
the alley in Block 27, East Shakopee Plat; lying between
Third and Fourth Avenues and between Prairie and Naumkeag
Streets; to which the City of Shakopee has asserted a claim.
{
All persons interested in the above vacation will be
given an opportunity to be heard.
Dated this 7th day of March, 1980.
Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
City of Shakopee
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
I, Judith S. Cox, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that I did post a copy of the above
notice of public hearing on March 17, 1980, on the bulletin board
on the main floor of the•Scott County Court House, on the bulletin
board in the Shakopee City Hall and on the bulletin board in the lobby
of the First National Bank of Shakopee.
Dated this 17th day of March, 1980.
SEAL
�. x L•f i ;1,� 1
:t f
l}
RESOLUTION NO. 1578
A RESOLUTION INITIATING THE VACATION OF THE PUBLIC ALLEY
IN BLOCK 27, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF EAST SHAKOPEE, •
SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, A PETITION has been received by abutting property
owners, requesting the vacation of the alley in Block 27, East
Shakopee Plat; and
WHEREAS, It has been made to appear to the Shakopee City Council
that the said alley serves no public use or interest; and
WHEREAS, A public hearing must be had before such action can
be taken and two weeks published and posted notice thereof must be
given.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SHAKOPEE, MINNEOSTA, That a hearing be held in the Council Chambers
on the 1st day of April, 1980 at 8:30 P.M., or thereafter., on the
matter of vacating the public alley in Block 27, East Shakopee Plat,
according eo the plat thereof.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That two weeks' published notice be
given by publication in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS and posted notice be
given by two weeks posting a copy of such notice on the bulletin board
in the main floor of the Scott County Court House, on the bulletin
board in the Shakopee City Hall and on the bulletin board in the
lobby of the First National Bank of Shakopee.
Adopted in adjourned regular session of the Shakopee City Council
held this 5th day of March, 1980.
4'
n
cting Ma dr of the'City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Ad istr.tor
Approved as to form this 5" day
of March, 1980.
4 111
City Attorney •
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Public Works Step Increases
DATE: March 27, 1980
In accordance with the 1979 contract with the employees of
the Public Works Department and employment agreements with
Michael Hullander and Richard Cheever, they are entitled to
step increases at this time. Since there is no current
contract with these employees, the City if not, of course,
legally bound to those increases, however, it is my recommend—
ation that the increases be granted since they will appear
in the next contract also when that is approved. These
salaries will again be adjusted by the new contract.
RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to adopt a salary step increase for Richard Cheever
from $6.75 to $7.50 effective March 26, 1980, and a salary
step increase for Michael Hullander effective February 27;
1980, from $5.25 to $6.00.
DSR /jiw
•
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: New City Employees -- Part -time and Future Custodians
DATE: March 27, 1980
For many years the City of Shakopee hired people to clean
the various City buildings on a Professional Service Contract.
Last year, we switched to using City employees at the request
of the employees and because this method better conforms to
appropriate state laws. When we did go to full -time employees,
we kept them at the same monthly earnings that they had previously
enjoyed with a cost of living increase at the beginning of 1980.
These employees did not, however, work a 40 hour week and,
therefore, received a low per hour pay based on a 40 hour week,
($4.06 per hour).
Several months ago, Doris Cheever left City employment to accept
another position. We have been trying various people on a
temporary part -time basis and have now decided to hire two people
on a permanent part -time basis to perform the work previously
done by Mrs. Cheever. In addition, I am recommending that we
put Beaney on a permanent part -time basis also since that'is
actually how she works.
Recommendation:
1. Authorize the hiring of Loyola Marshall and Rose Mertz as
permanent part -time employees at a salary of $4.50 per
Four with an increase to $5.00 per hour upon successful
completion of a six month probationary period.
2. Authorize the change of status and salary of Beaney
from full -time City employee at $4.06 per hour to
permanent part -time employee at $6.00 per hour. She
has worked for the City for several decades and is
responsible for supervising the custodian services
in all City buildings and she will take home the same
amount of money she now makes.
DSR /jiw
•
HOLMES STREET AD HOC COMMITTEE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
PUBLIC MEETING MARCH 19, 1980
•
Chairman Siebenaler called the meeting to order at 7:34 P.M. in the auditorium of
the Senior High School with Committee Members present: Weiler, Dellwo, Kerber,
Groff, and Ries. Also present were Douglas S. Reeder, City Admr., and Bo Spurrier,
City Engineer. Mr. Volding arrived late and Mr. Raduenz and Mr. Wermerskirchen were
absent.
Chrm.Siebenaler welcomed the citizens present and Mayor Harbeck thanked the members
of the Audience for coming to the meeting.
Chrm.Siebenaler briefly explained how the committee came to be; and the study and
research that they have performed over the past two years on the condition of
Holmes Street. He then turned the meeting over to the City Engineer to explain
the tentative recommendations of the Committee to the Council for the improvement
of Holmes Street.
The City Engineer explained the proposed improvements for Holmes Street, as
outlined in a feasibility study prepared for Council consideration. He also explained
the proposed methods of funding the improvements.
The following briefly summarizes the questions and answers addressed by the property
owners present regarding the proposed improvements.
Allan Schroeder, 936 Holmes, asked if Holmes Street would be widened, and what the
interest rate would be charged to the property owners. Engr. ans. that the street
would not be widened; and the Admr. ans. that the interest would be a little more
than what the bonds are sold for. He also explained that under the current law we
would not be able to sell bonds as the interest rate is currently greater than that
allowed, but that there is legislation being considered by the legislature to increase
the current ° limit.
Joe Marschall, 533 Piercd, asked why he was being assessed again for storm sewer when
he was assessed for the West Side Storm Sewer. Engr. ans. that he would not be assess—
ed again for storm sewer, but that he is in the benefitted area of the proposed sanitary
sewer.
Gary Mortensen, 428 West 2nd asked if the trunk storm sewer benefitted everyone. Engr.
answered that everyone will be assessed for the trunk and that laterals will have
to be installed within the next two to three years and that everyone will be assessed
again for the lateral serving them.
Eunice Schaefer, 118 East 6th asked if the level of the new street was going to be
changed and how that may affect her property. Eng. ans. that a foot will be cut
below Shakopee Avenue and 10th and that the side streets will be made to match
Holmes Street. Some streets will be cut as much as 12 feet. Every driveway will
be checked so as not to leave a mess later on because of lowering of elevation. Most
significant elevation changes are at intersections, not driveways to homes.
March 19, 1980
Page —2—
Dr. Joseph Huber, 845 Holmes, asked what type of curb would be installed. Concerned
that one could open car door. Eng. ans. that a vertical curb would be installed as
is now between Shakopee Avenue and 10th Avenue. There would be a 2% slope from
mid street to the curb.
Floyd Engelen, 820 Atwood, asked why the recommendation to pay for the improvements
is proposed this way. He paid for his own sanitary sewer. Who pays the taxes, who
pays the sewer bills; he is going to end up paying more for this project than people
living on Holmes Street! Clean the manholes out; streets cost more than other projects;
not necessary now; can't see flooding; why business district cut off; the water is
more beneficial to the downtown area; storm sewer too expensive.
F. F. (Doug) Schneider, 127 West 4th Avenue, asked if the storm sewer enlarged in
1956 (from 2nd going North on Holmes) is going to be eliminated now. Eng. ans. that
this 18" pipe will now be used for the area of 2nd and Bluff only, hence the new
pipe will not serve this area.
David Hart, 942 Clay, asked if there was sufficient funds in the sewer fund to pay
for the costs of the sanitary sewer, and if not, how much would the rates be increased
and for how long. City Admr. ans. that the rates will have to be increased and there
may also be al -hook up charge set up for new users, as there is not sufficient funds
to pay for the total cost at this time.
Lawrence Geis, 918 Holmes, asked why the watermain beyond 7th avenue was not going to
be replaced. Engr. asked the Utilities Manager to respond. Lou VanHout, Utilities
Manager ans. that there have been no problems with the watermain in this area over
the past four years and that the expected life of a watermain pipe is 40 to 100'years.
Gentleman from audience talked about the land being porus. Eng. stated that the grade
between Shakopee Avenue and 10th Avenue is being increased to get the water out. Water
seeps in beWeen curb and bituminous. Now a curb will be installed to collect water.
The new road will be a nine ton road.
Chrm. Siebenaler asked what would be done if the City can't bond for the
improvements. Eng. ans. he would not recommend spending money on an overlay, the
foundation is no.good. He suggested limiting access to local traffic.
Florence Miles, 1039 Atwood, asked the dollar figure, cost per lot for the storm
sewer. Ans. $.04 per square foot, or $340.00 for a 60X142 foot lot.
Bob Rademacher, 809 Lewis, asked what streets are draining to Holmes St. Ans. laterals
are on 7th, 5th, 4th, 3rd, and 2nd.
Cal Brown, 956 Holmes, asked why the residents on Holmes St. should be penalized by
the closing of Holmes Street (if it is not improved) when the job should have been
done earlier.
Emil Heiden, 206 West 3rd, what is the trunk storm sewer going to do for him; he
floods every rain; have to pay for a trunk now then again later for a lateral to
get rid of the water; Fuller has defect in pavement; proposes remainder of system
(laterals) be done in near future to complete the project.
f
March 19, 1980
Page 3-
Marjorie Lucarelli, 961 Fuller, asked if the gullies will remain at the Church at
8th and Fuller. Engr. ans. this area will have to be studied, maybe we'll have to
put in a special lateral to address this problem.
Clair Van Maldeghem, 930 Holmes, asked how long service would be interrupted to the
homes. Eng. ans. hope not at all, but if so only a matterlof hours.
Leo Thomas, 934 Lewis, asked who will pay for the repair of Lewis Street, if Holmes
street is closed and people start using Lewis. Would like the roads posted for
load limit and asked if the City will enforce the load limit.
Unidentified gentleman stated that the trunk is estimated to cost one —half million
dollars and asked what the total cost will be when the laterals are constructed and
connected. Eng. ans. $650,000 to 800,000 depending on problems we encounter, this
includes street reconstruction. Proposing a five year storm as the rest of the
City has.
Irene Hunziker, 701 Holmes, asked how long Holmes Street would be torn up. Engr.ans.,
if we can bid the end of April, by winter we'll be driving on all bituminous except
the last couple of inches of final bituminous surfacing.
Leo Thomas, 934 Lewis, questioned hbw we have a $0.04 estimate for the storm sewer
when we have not yet received bids.
Madge Olson, 940 Holmes, asked why it was determined that a sidewalk be installed
between Shakopee Avenue and 10th; she signed a petition against the sidewalk. Engr.
ans. Planning Commission and Council have indicated that sidewalks ought to be
constructed on major thoroughfares; and to satisfy this criteria, the Engr. has to
recommend that sidewalks be placed on Holmes Street.
Ron Weiler, Member of Committee, 921 Holmes, stated that he would like it entered into
the minutessthat the Committee does concur that no sidewalk be built on Holmes St.
between Shakopee Ave. and 10th Avenue.
Chrm.Siebenaler stated that the Committee has • taken that into account.
An unidentified gentlemen commended the recommendation to put in the utilities before
putting in the roads.
Floyd Engelen, 820 Atwood, asked what will be done if the street is not put in, where
is the money coming from to pay for the proposed improvements, you're not giving
honest answers to questions, sewer costs will go up, if there is just a 10% error
on the estimated one million project it equals 100,000; you are proposing no assessments
now for the sewer, what happens when the sewer fund is broke, then next year you'll
be broke and will have to go back to assessing for projects.
Gary Voiding, 1044 Fuller, Member of Committee, apologized for coming late and stated
that it is not fair to criticize the Committee now after the fact, the committee is
basing their findings after much research, one should find out more information
before being critical.
Unidentified gentleman has drainage problem at 5th and Pierce. Engr. to pursue.
Unidentified gentleman has drainage problem at 620 Pierce West.
Leon Hartman, 728 Scott, asked if State aid was picking up all costs, thought that
they paid only a percentage.
• I -7 r vl
March 19, 1980
Page -4-
Bernard Bauman, 858 Holmes, concerned that there is no watermain proposed past
5th Avenue, as there has been breakages in the area. Eng. ans. that the televising
indicated that the sanitary sewer is okay in this area and SPUC is judging that
the watermain is good from 5th to 10th.
Leo Thomas, 934 Lewis, stated that he was unaware of the Holmes St. Ad. Hoc Committee,
or that it was looking for input from citizens, was never contacted, and only recently
became aware of the project.
Alfred Geis, 904 Holmes, asked what was going to be done with the manhole in front
of his house, stated he is not connected to Holmes Street, but would like to be connected
when the new pipes are installed. City Engr. made note.
Mrs. Rusch, 939 Holmes, asked how much land would be taken to build the sidewalk.
Eng..ans. the sidewalks will be built within the right —of —way.
Mona Strunk, 103 East 3rd Avenue, asked that the City not have meetings on Wednesdays
during lent, as there are church services.
August Del.lwo, Committee Member, commented: 1) Eng. is trying to be honest and is
not giving out costs that he can't back up, is fair, honest and capable; 2) the
Committee is interested that the-engineering work on this project be done by City
staff, keeping°athe,costs: down, 3) is not promoting this project, but is looking at
it fairly and seeing that the citizens get a fair shake, 4) the design by the City
Engineer, Mr. Spurrier,, will work), 5) recognizes the gyesers at 5th and Pierce,
and 6) stated that all the committee members do not live on Holmes Street.
Larry Geis, 918 Holmes suggested that the sidewalk on Holmes So. of Shakopee Avenue
be placed on the West side of the street and the city plow in the winter; which would
help the older people who live in this area.
Dr. Joe Huber, 845 Holmes, asked if the intersections are going to be dropped a
foot a half. Engineer clarified, and stated that driveway restoration would
be paid for out of cost of the project.
Al Hanson, 534 So. Holmes, doesn't want to loose maple trees, and concerned with floods.
Jim Lodermeier, 217 W. Shakopee Avenue & property on Apgar, expressed concern that
if we wait on this project until the interest rates come down, that what we save in
interest will be lost in increased costs, because of putting the project off.
Chrm.Siebenaler publicly thanked Jon Erichson, former City Engr., for his work with
the Committee and getting them started out on the right track.
Chrm.Siebenaler thanked the citizens for coming to the meeting. Meeting adjourned
at 9:47 P.M.
Ray Siebenaler, Chairman
Holmes Street Ad Hoc Committee
3a
1 M
Y/P0
i � D
HOLMES STREET AD HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
WHAT IS PROPOSED
STREET CONSTRUCTION
a. Rebuild Holmes Street from 2nd Avenue to 10th Avenue to the
same width of 44 feet removing where possible the dips.
CURB AND GUTTER
a. Replace all existing curbs and gutters on Holmes Street
between 2nd Avenue and 10th Avenue.
b. Construct curb and gutter where none exists on Holmes
Street between 2nd Avenue and 10th Avenue.
SIDEWALK
a. Replace all sidewalks, which need replacement, on Holmes
Street between 2nd Avenue and Shakopee Avenue.
b. Construct sidewalks on the East side of Holmes Street where
none now exists between 2nd Avenue and Shakopee Avenue.
c. Construct no sidewalk on Holmes Street between Shakopee
Avenue and 10th Avenue.
WATER
a. Construct a watermain from 2nd Avenue to 5th Avenue on
Holmes Street.
b. Construct a watermain on 2nd Avenue from Fuller to Holmes
Street.
cc. Construct a watermain on Fuller from 2nd Avenue to Levee
Drive.
d. Construct new service lines.
SANITARY SEWER
a. Replace all sanitary sewer lines in Holmes Street from 2nd
Avenue to 7th Avenue.
b. Replace service lines to boulevard 2nd Avenue to 10th Avenue.
STORM SEWER
a. Construct a storm sewer trunk line in Holmes Street from 2nd
Avenue to 7th Avenue.
b. Construct a storm sewer trunk line on 2nd Avenue from Holmes
to Fuller:
c. Construct a storm sewer trunk line on Fuller Street from 2nd
Avenue to the Minnesota River.
-2-
HOW WILL THESE PROJECTS BE PAID FOR?
STREET CONSTRUCTION - State Aid
Ad Valorem Taxes
No Special Assessments
CURB AND GUTTER -
a. Replacement of existing curb and gutter - State Aid
Ad Valorem Taxes
No Special Assessments
b. Construction of curb and gutter where none exists - Special
assessment of property on front foot basis.
SIDEWALK -
a. Replacement of existing sidewalk and construction of new
sidewalk - State Aid
Ad Valorem Taxes
No Special Assessments
WATER - Tax Increment Project for Elderly Highrise
' Water Fund Revenue
Special Assessment for service lines to property line
STORM SEWER - 80% Ad Valorem Taxes
20% Assessed on square footage (Land used or zoned
other than single or double family residential
will be assessed at twice the rate.)
WHAT ARE THE ESTIMATED COSTS?
. Strdet $ 216,750
Curb and Gutter ' 124,850 '
Sidewalk 43,490
Water 98,610
Sanitary Sewer 99,340
Storm Sewer Trunk 507,900
TOTAL $1,090,940
•
• -3-
7(
WHAT ARE THE RECOMMENDED ESTIMAThD ASSESSMENTS?
Street None
Curb and Gutter None if currently existing, if not,
$19.60 per front foot
Sidewalk None
Water Assessed only if property fronts Holmes St.
$175 per lot
Sanitary Sewer Assessed only if property fronts Holmes St.
$175 per lot
Storm Sewer Trunk Total amount assessed - $101,580.00
Estimated per square foot cost - $0.016
Estimated per average 8500 square foot lot
$136.00.
WHO WILL BE ASSESSED?
Street No one
Curb and Gutter People on Holmes Street who do not have
curb and gutter now.
Sidewalk No one
Water People who front on Holmes will be assessed
for the service line from the watermain to
their property.
Sanitary Sewer People who front on Holmes Street will be
assessed for the service line from the
sewer trunk to their property.
Storm Sewer All property owners in the storm sewer district
will be assessed now for the storm sewer trunk
in Holmes Street and all property owners will
be assessed within several years for the
installation of storm sewer laterals to
complete the system.
•
•
?(W
MEMO TO; Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Infiltration /Inflow Assessment, Shakopee, Minnesota
DATE: March 27, 1980
As you must be well aware of, Shakopee has been advised as being in
need of an infiltration /inflow assessment under the Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission's "20l" facilities planning program.
Under this program, the City will be able to receive a grant for
90% of the project cost, leaving only 10% to be paid for by the
City.
I would expect the cost of such a program to be in the range of
$50,000, leaving roughly $5,000 for the City's share.
I wish to be authorized to seek proposals for this work among
consultants specialized in furnishing this service.
•
The action I would therefore desire from Council is to be authorized
to accept proposals for consideration for engineering services for
the appropriate I/I analysis required by the "201" facilities plan.
DSRxnae '
SPRINGSTED 3
INCORPORATED
PUBLIC FINANCE
ADVISORS
f'
26 March 1980 �'= � 1~��
q
Mr. Douglas Reeder, City Administrator
City Hall
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
RE: IDR Application of Progress Valley Park
Dear Mr. Reeder:
We have reviewed the application for this issue and find the following deficiencies:
Item 9 - Apparently the proposed facility will be leased to Laser Engineering and
A & M Roofing. However, there is no commitment showing by either
firm, as is required by the City.
You may wish to review the proposed lease documents to determine
( sufficiency of revenues to pay debt service and maintenance costs for
the facility. The terms of the lease should also be reviewed to determine
their relationship to the term of the financing.
Item 10 - Apparently interim financing will be required. There is no commitment
letter on the availability of that interim financing.
Item 15 - We are not familiar with Amfac Mortgage Company. Therefore we
recommend the company be required to provide the required list of five
other similar issues completed by the mortgage company.
In addition, there is no finding by the mortgage company that the project is feasible
and that the financing can be placed by the company. Such finding is required prior
to any public hearing you may order on the project.
In addition, there is no indication of Bond Counsel, and there is no finding by Bond
Counsel that the project is a qualified project under the Act. That determination
also is required before the public hearing.
In the event the City proceeds with this issue we recommend the City review all
proposed final documentation on the security of the mortgage financing to
determine the responsibility of the partnership for debt service payments in the
event lease payments are insufficient to pay all facility costs.
I am returning the material submitted to me on this project.
__Respectful Q ly subm
President
800 Osborn Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 (612) 222 -4241
?J
DORSEY, WINDHORST, HANNAFORD, WHITNEY a HALLADAY
2300 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55402
TELEX: 28 -0605 CABLE: DOROW
(612) 340 -2600
1468 W -FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
(612) 227-8017
April 1, 1980
Ms. Mary Alice Brophy
Commissioner of Securities
Minnesota Department of Commerce
• Securities Division
500. Metro Square Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Re: City of Shakopee, Minnesota
(Progress Valley Park Project)
Dear Ms. Brophy:
We have reviewed a resolution adopted by the City
Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, on Tuesday,
March 11, 1980, entitled "RESOLUTION CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING
ON A PROJECT UNDER THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOP-
MENT ACT, CHAPTER 474, MINNESOTA STATUTES," and a resolution
adopted by the City Council on Tuesday, April 1, 1980, entitled
"RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROJECT UNDER
THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, AUTHORIZING
THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF SAID PROJECT
TO TH; COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES, AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARA-
TION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH
SAID PROJECT," relating to aproposal that the City issue its
revenue obligations pursuant to the Act to finance a project
to be undertaken by Progress Valley Park, a Minnesota general
partnership (the Partnership).
On the basis of our review of the resolutions and
preliminary discussions with representatives of the Partnership
as to the nature of the project and the proposed financing,
it is presently our opinion that the project constitutes a
"project" within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section
474.02, Subdivision la, and that the City is authorized,
assuming further proceedings are taken in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 474 and any other applicable law, to
issue its revenue bonds to finance the project as proposed
by the resolution.
Very truly yours,
-;,,) L yz_e! //72:_/.1„,
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Proposed Industrial Revenue Bond
Progress Valley Park - $1,600,000
DATE: March 27, 1980
Attached is the application for Industrial Revenue Bonds for
Progress Valley Park. This proposal is presented by James
O'Neil for the construction of a 52,000 square foot warehouse
facility in the Industrial Park. It is projected that 75
people will be employed in the facility which will be leased
to Laser Engineering and A and M Roofing.
The application has been reviewed by Springsted, Inc.
the Dorsey Firm is the bond counsel. The appropriate •
documentations and resolutions have been submitted and reviewed
by the Assistant City Attorney.
This is a Mortgage Revenue Note which is being handled'in•the
normal manner. The City of Shakopee will not have title to
the facility at any time. The $4,000 fee has been paid.
DSR /jiw
Attachment
•
0
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
• AP1'1.ICATION FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
Dace March 11, 1980
Applicant Name: Progress Valley Park
Address: c/o Al Stephani - 12751 County Road 5, Burnsville, MN 55337
.Phone: #890 -1217
Location of•Proposed Project (address and legal description):
Lots 5 - 8, Block 1, Valley Park Fifth Addition . •
Please answer'fully all of•the following questions. You may attach
requested documentations: .
•
7.. What.is che specific proposed use of che facility?
Laser machine cutting and treatment of roofs and other industrial uses.
2. What is che project's estimated minimum and maximum size and/or
capacity? 52,000 sq ft.
B
3. How many new people will be employed in Shakopee as a direct
result' of this proposed project?
approximately 75
4. What is the proposed date for start of construction? Completion
of construction? Start of construction: Immediately
Completion of construction: 150 days
5. Whac is the estimated range of costs for the facility:
a. Building construction. $ 1,471,400.00
b. Furnishings. $ 35,000.00
c. Property development. $ 50,000.00 •
d. Land acquisition. • $ 133,560.00
.e. Professional. fees. $ 20,000.00
•
•
•
•
• Appl icatiun for Commercial 1)evelopmenC issues Page 2 �
•
1) ' Architectural engineer=ing $ 50,000.00
2) Legal $ 10,000.00 •
3) Fiscal $ 14,000.00
•
f. Other (detail).
•
•
6. What is the applicant's legal interest in the land?
Equitable Title
7. A list of all members of any corporation, partnership or
other organizations'wh:ich will have a legal and fiscal
interest in the ownership and management of project and chat
identification of that interest, and listing of credit and
professional references for all interested parties (if
applicable), James F. O'Neill, Alfred H. Stephani, James M.
Burkemper, Timothy L.. Menning, and Patrick M. Gannon.
•
' 8. Resume of any person, partnership, or corporation which will
own or manage any portion of the facility.
• Same as #7.
9. :If any of the project is to be leased to other parties, an
identification of those parties and a showing of commitment
.for chat 7interest.
• Laser Engineering and A & M Roofing will both lease.
•
10. If interim financing is required, a showing of,a binding
commitment for that financing from a reputable lender.
To be supplied.
11. Statement as to the fiscal financing method co be used such
- as bonds, mortgage revenue notes, or unsecured debt.
.Mortgage Revenue Note
12.. Statement as -to whether the financing instruments will be
sold to individuals, insurance companies, savings institutions
• or other. Institutional Sale
•
13. If considered appropriate by the City, a financing feasibility
report maybe required which will detail those physical
service and financial factors which will indicate possible
success or failure of the proposed facility. ; .
14. Method of payment of all public cost to be incurred in develop-
ment of the property.
All improvements already in.
•
•
•
•
•
Ahpli.cacion for Commercial Development. issues Page 3
15. Name of che•underwr.iter or investment banker who will be
selected co place the final financing. A tisc of at 1easc
five ocher issues which have been completed by the underwriter
or banker shall be provided.
Amfac Mortgage Company
16. Name of the proposed trustee co be desi.gnaced.
NA •
•
•
(Signed) ALFRED H. i EPHANI
March 11, 1980
(Date)
•
•
•
•
1
MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator 9:,1froe,
FROM: Gregg M. Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Sewer Fund Budget and 1980 Rate
DATE: March 27, 1980
Attached is the proposed 1980 Sewer Fund Budget. The Sewer Fund is
an enterprise fund and therefore the budget is a flexible budget which is
used more for planning and setting rates as opposed to the General Fund
Budget which is a legal appropriation of funds. What is contained in
the Sewer Budget are costs necessary to keep the system operating. There
is very little in the budget of a discretionary type nature that could change
the budget significantly.
Based on this budget, we need to adopt a rate to provice sufficient
revenue. The rate is broken down into three (3) parts.
1) The first part is the flat charge per month for service "availability ".
The costs intended to be covered by this are total operating expenses less
MWCC current use charges and less depreciation on contributed assets. This
amounts to $76,200.00. Our present rate is $22.00 per year for this connection
fee. At an estimated 2,650 customers, it should generate $58,300.00, •
2) The second part of the rate is a maintenance charge for large users
also supporting the "availability costs ". The present rate is $40 per million
gallons for flows over one million gallons per year. For 1979 this generated
$18,120.00 from 453 million gallons.
3) The third part of the rate is to cover the flow or usage portion of
the budget. The rate needs to generate $433,734.00 that MWCC is billing the
• City. This amount ($433,734), divided by estimated water sold /sewage flow
(706 million gallons) = 62 /1000 gallons. Because this rate will be in effect
for only part of 1980, and to help build up retained earnings I suggest the flow
rate be set at 67 c /1000 gallons.
While based on budgeted needs of $76,200 and projected revenue of $76,420
(current conditions assumed to continue) it would appear the first and second
parts of the rate are adequate. However, there is a good possibility that flow
under the second part of the rate may decrease due to several factors. A decrease
in this flow will not cut our estimated cost, only cut revenues. Therefore,
to provide for the possibility of lost revenue due to decreased flow, to build up
some additional retained earnings and to provide some internally generated capital
for fixed asset acquisition, it is recommended that the "availability" charge
beset at $26 /year with expected revenue of $66,250 and that the large flow
charge be set at $45 /M.G. with expected revenue of $19,818. Please keep in mind
a new rate would be in effect for only part of the year.
•
<<
Douglas S. Reeder '
March 27, 1980
Page Two
•
•
The proposed rate is summarized as follows:
P R O P O S E D •
Present A B C
Availability Charge $ 22 /yr.. $ 24 /yr. $ 26 /yr. $ 28 /yr.
Large Flow Fee 40 /M.G. 44 /M.G. 45 /M.G. 50 /M.G.
•
Current Use Charge 60Q /1000g. 66Q /1000g. 67Q /1000g. 67Q /1000g.
•
Residential Flat Rate 5.43/mo. 6.44/mo. 6.68/mo. 6.84/mo.
Fixed Income /Senior Citizen 4.65/mo. 5.43/mo. 5.43/mo. 5.43/mo.
� Estimated Revenue $477,284 $537,040. $546,718 $552,120
Between the present rate the recommended rate 'B', there is a 15% increase
in the "availability fee ", a 12.5% increase in the large flow fee and a 12%
increase in the current use charges. The residential flat fee equivalent shows
a larger percentage increase (23 %) due to increased water use by the residential
. sector, based on data obtained from SPUC.
The fixed income /Senior Citizen rate adopted by Council last,year is
included under the premise of that rate being one year behind the rate for
other residences,
.v
In order to provide for additional cash flow needed for debt service for
planned reconstruction projects, it is proposed to initiate a City connection
charge comparable to the SAC charge collected by MWCC. The current charge is
$425.00 per SAC unit. It is recommended to adopt the same schedule as MWCC
and have it change whenever MWCC's schedule changes. Due to the present condition
of the building industry it is very difficult to predict how much revenue this
charge would generate. A very rough guess is that it may generate $10,000.00
for 1980.
Also, attached is a survey of some other cities, showing what their residential
sewer service rate is. Additionally, there is a short schedule showing the
present and proposed sewer service bills for selected volumes of flow (commercial /
industrial customers).
•
•
•
GMV /ljw
Attachments
•
7k
RESIDENTIAL SEWER CHARGE SURVEY
RESIDENTIAL
SEWER
CITY CHARGE CITY SAC CHARGE
Minnetonka $ 14.92 /Quarterly None
Victoria 20.00 /Quarterly City Core Charge = $710 - applied to
extensions- picked up on new building
permits.
Deephaven 20.00 /Quarterly None
Eden Prairie 12.75 /Quarterly None
Robbinsdale 19.00 /Quarterly None
Mound 20.00 /Quarterly None
Orono 22.75 /Quarterly None
Prior Lake 12.00 /Quarterly None
Savage 15.00 /Quarterly None
Chaska 2.3.22 /Quarterly Yes - $220.00
. St. Anthony 13.46 /Quarterly None
Spring Lake Park 12.55 /Quarterly None
Bloomington 11.55 /Quarterly None
1980 SEWER FUND BUDGET
Actual Budget Estimated Proposed
1978 1979 1979 1980
Expenditures
4100 FT Salaries 17,000 15,000 15,194 19,000
4112 FT Overtime 400 612 700
4130 PT Salaries 300 651 700
4140 PERA 865 1,024 1,100
4141 FICA 960 750 850
• 4150 Health & Life Ins. 610 632 650
4151 Workmens Comp 1,325 1,500
.4220 General Supplies 3,942 3,000 2,091 3,500
4230 Equip. Maint. 1,215 1,700 759 2,000
4232 Vehicle Maint. 298 350 300
4234 Utility System Maint. 4,087 30,000 30,000
4310 Legal Services 100
4312 Engineering Services 2,747 2,500 2,500
4315 Other Prof.Service 13,925 5,000 541 7,000
4350 Legal Notices 50
4351 Printing 50 •
4360 Gen. Liability 203 230 168 200
4361 Property Taxes 100
4362 Vehicle Insurance 312 330 565 600
4382 Machinery Rental 255 150 1,000
4384 EDP Equip. Rental 108
4393 Awards & Indemnities 1,131 1,500 1,500
4990 Miscellaneous 72 100 100
4411' Current Use Charges 328,824 403,443 381,151 433,734
Depreciation 9,339 12,210 12,210 18,000
•
Total Operating Expense $524,934
•
'
i
1
•
CROSS SECTION COMPARISON OF COMMERCIAL SEWER BILLS
12 mo @ 12 mo @
Business 1979 Flow 1979 Rate Proposed "B" Differential
1 285,709,000 g. $ 182,847 $ 204,276 $ 21,429
2 87,679,000 g. 56,109 62,685 6,576
3
1,820,000 g. 1,154 1,290 136
4` 242,000 g. 167 188 21
5 10,000 g. 28 32 4
•
0
Resolution No. 1594
5/
A RESOLUTION SETTING SEWER SERVICE CHARGES
- 'BEIT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
} MINNESOTA,.that pursuant to Section 3.02, Shakopee City Code,
ye
the following sewer service charges are hereby set and established
pursuant-. ;thereto: •
Sewer service for private residences - $6.68 per
.month.
B. Sewer service for commercial and industrial accounts -
- •, .67. cents for every 1,000 gallons.. or part thereof of
metered sewer flow or water usage, plus $6.50 per quarter
••'•as a service charge, plus a service charge of $45.00
per million gallons or part thereof of metered sewer
flow or water usage for all users with an annualized
•
e► flow in excess of one million gallons.
,C. .;Senior Citizen rate shall be $5.43 per. month.
.
D. The above rates to be effective with the bills sent
our on or. about May 1, 1980.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Resolution No.. 1372 is hereby
repealed.
Adopted in session of the City Council
of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this _ day of.
1980.
Mayor -- —
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of , 1980.
•
City Attorney
q
IEMO TO; Gregg M. Voxland
Finance Director •
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
RE: Landscaping Around Public Works Building
DATE: March 17, 1980
Jim Karkanen has presented me with estimates to complete
the'needed landscaping around Public Works Building. It
looks like we will need approximately $1500 to landscape
this area. Would you please give me a status report on
the bond fund used to construct this building. If there are
not sufficient monies remaining in this fund to complete
this landscaping, please identify any potential sources of
funds to complete this work.
I would like to take this matter to the City Council as
soon as possible. Thanks!
DSR /jiw
2. Gl1 ° 47V -6'7a" . fr '�' , �-, �7 /9e
.�v
pi CITY OF SHAKOPE 9�
E'
129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
MEMO
TO: Doug Reeder, Administrator DATE March 28, 1980 19
Re: Landscaping at Municipal Services Bldg.
These are the quotations for the Zabel Honeysuckle Hedge and Russian Olive plants to be used
around the fence at the Public Works storage yard. We're recommending that we accept the
low quote from Minn. Valley Garden Center for a total of $ 867.00...
ZABEL Honeysuckle ( 8 - 10 ft. 220 - 4 ft. Bare root Q 3.35 ea. $ 737.00
RUSSIAN OLIVE ( 25 ft. growth ) 20 - 4 ft. Bare root Q 6.50 ea. $ 130.00
$ 867.00
The Russian Olive will be planted on the south perimeter of the storage .yard facing
the Chard Development. They will be planted at 15 ft. spacings.
The Honeysuckle plant will be planted on the East, South, and Wert sections of the yard.,
They will be planted at 4 ft. spacings.
FROM Jim Karkanen, Public Works Dept.
. _ -
•
ZABEL HONEYSUCKLE (8 -10 ft.) TRIO TREE SERV. TOTAL MINN. VALLEY TOTAL
GARDEN CENTER
270 - 2 ft. Bare Root (3 ft. space) 3.00 ea. $ 810.00 2.80 ea. $756.00
220 - 3 ft. Bare Root (4 ft. space) 3.80 ea. $ 836.00 3.35 ea. 737.(3)
RUSSIAN OLIVE TREES (25 ft.)
20 - 4 ft. Bare Root (15 ft. space; 7.00 ea. $ 140.00 6.50 ea. $130.00
~ ' ...... -_
. [
ArrnMIT/DEScRIOTTnN • ESI. REVENUE' - •:._ :' • ACTUAL : TANTE' ' PCT ; -.EST. REVENUE 1 , .• ACTUAL • VARIANCE • PCT '
'1 . 301 SP. LFVY ... .4ATCHING. FUNDS ., ,-, •,,, ,- . ,. , , ,. .00 . - ,......,,,,,,:,, :.,.,... '..,,.,' 7 ;. ,, ... ... , .00 •.. , .00 . . Id
-
•
•
�
���l? ^np[xn"�w1 x"^»c"[v , 1 .00 12.o» 22.00 ��
' 3cos n^�p ( IF °A"s s71,sn � .no •s7/.s3 577,53
�'" 3s1^ »/ nnp ' �s o" .00 75.00 75.00 ~`
I, j• � ^ ` ^ "
`u --__--_. -' - -' _- ' -- . . . . .. . ' — __'_ _---
• |
.
U_ .
x 19Rn CITY nF SHAKOPFF R E v F N U E R E P O R T A3 OF 2 -29 -R0 • PAGE 7_
•
r "1 f n1 rFNERAL Fowl) C U 9. R k N T• M 0 . N.7 . 1-1' YE A R" T O '0 A T E. e 1..
-!_
-- ncr , :_
4 nTi ESCRIPTION - _ E PEVENUE__ __ •__ -_ ACTUAL__ • _ • ._ VARIANCE,- � - PCT_ EST._'REVEN JE_ '
ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT .
( 3515 SURVEY r.HFCK FEE 3 .00 .00 6.00 6.00
3511. FTI_ING FEE • ° .00 .00 .00 .00 ;
-
3517 MzCr, PRQPERTY PENTALS 351/ STP -- - .21 y ; _ -
.00 .1 ;200.04 "1 .2130.00 1:,
•.. ri EFT REPAIR . a .00 a l'.-- 00 210;00. 210..00
?n SNnty REMnvAI 567.00 ¢ ' •' .00 56 567.00
to 3521 PIIotIC t1rP PENT Lg- - -.00 _ .56 -- ;CO - -- _ x._0.0 ���:
^ 3s 3
' 352? 'lEE!) CUTTINr; CHARLES .00 - .00 • • .00 ,00 h
( 35x3 MISC..PP,�:KS SERVICES _ - .00 • 173.94' - .48.90 • .00 .00- 48.90 173:94-- ..__ .. - - 173.94 . -1: - 1
" 3530 ACCTnF'T
( •48.90 k
' ' 3531 MIST POL10E sERVIrES '. • .00 f' .00 .00 • .00
I ,c 3537 PntIUn FEES r. FINES , ,00 ---, = `_. 04,00 - -- --- TJL-;11a --
( 3533 FTPF CALLS R STANnnY FEES 5.902.50 c .00 6,222.50 6,222.50 • 72
v 3530 FTPF NIIMHE0 FEFS .00 .00 • .00 .00
35n0 SEASO`! TICKETS -Pool . .00 .00 - . 06
t�
( '.. 3501 A 0"tSS1f]NS-POnt .00 .,� c . X0,0 .00 .. .00
i. ',. _3 UUTMn+TNr, LF5 fNg ._ . - a ' ,ri, ' ` .00 . .00 . " f :•
:' 350 Kist., Pnnt. INCOME 00 ' -- _- __ .00 t .00 - .Op - -- __
(, " 3614 r.OUHTY COURT FINFq 3.149.83 ' •. .00 5,154.83 _ 5,154.83
3731 �AnHeGF C(1LL. CHARGES 14.305.30 .00 10,305.30 14,305,34 '
i 3Rf n Tn.t1FnFST .00 .. .00 .00" .
:? i• 3R7n Cn "CESSIONS -PnnL 6.493.25 .00 f1, 493.25 6.493.25
f.a 3R?tt - I(�F 53 8.63 .. c.. .00 538.63 538.63• ,:
q 383(3 An!
� pEQMFn1T TRM'IFEPS - -_--.- 00 .00 .06 `- - - -- -- 0 - -- - 1-
._ .
, ( 385n CnNT°T;;NTIONS R o \ ,n0 .00 .00 .00
' '•+ 3 °511 °EFIJMns t RETMnURSEHENTS 1.359.83 - .00 1,359.83 1,359.83
I..; 3 °51 iras. CI_ATMS R.= MFN •
_.. ..... .00 -. X00 .. 576.86 -.- 576.86
SETTLE TS
399n MTSCF.LL ?UF.ltIS 177.07 .00 261.07 261.07 ' • •
1, � - - r..+ nTHFP n EvENIWS - - -- -- ._�_.. -- 39.707.73 _ ;00_ _5T ;7R -1 _'- _-
Zlf'51-781.21' - -- - -
-- --:,
, Al I ' I FUNK TnTnr s ._.. - .__._ - .._.._... 72.433;24 - - ..--- ------ ---------- "--.00 •
T 'T i±t ± I
ail
le-
_1 •
• I ..,1
.
. _ . _____ -------------,
, -
.
.. • .
• . I
198n tyre nF sHAKoPEE . EXPENDITURE.R.EPORT • • AS OF .2-29-80 PAGE 1j
( z FuNn 1)1 • GENERAL FOND -.- .'C O'R OEN'IMON-TH". ' ':'-',:' . YEAR- 0 0 -
• ACCOONTiOESCRIPTION APPROPRIATION - .' , ' , . -. -ACTL1AL '',.: "'VARIAWCE: PCT ,. ., :'ACTUAL ": VARIANCE PCT . 31
- -. •
. •
C r . 4100 SALARIES-FoLL TTmE . 60 A 348.21 • • ' • . 724,998.00 120'027.40 604.270.60 16.7
0 4112. OVERTImE-FoLL TI" ' 711.35 .
. 8,250.00 ' 2,627.70 • 5,622.30 31.9
(6 $ - PART .iii --, 7.T7,7 7 ,-77- : .L48 S3 .. , ,,- '::., • :,...:-.;;„, . H ,., . . , 9 .200 ..00 -- .77 -- 13,993.40 - 7- 91;20610 -- ' 5.2 - 7 - 17-
t, 1 b D13P. SEVERANCE PAY.: . . ' . :...•::'.: ' r .-- ' ' '= -..: ;461; 67 - ''. ?.:-;„- ; 00 '''..".%' -, 1::::: 467;67 • . ' 467.67-
9 ta opEp A . ,. , .. .• . - ,.., z , ,, - 'i , '': '. :,-H .`• ", , . , P , 013 18 • .1 .; ..;---, 61; bes. co '::::' „: ; 8;273: 71 -. : ''.'- 520311.29 13.5 111
12
1 blal PENSUINS■FICA . ' 2.053.29 . .- - 29.306,00
( n nla? PENSInNS-FIRE . .
17,785.00 .00 , 17,785.00 .0 J.
, 1 4150 HEALTH R. LIFE INSURANCE • 2.125.36 . 34,896.00 4,327.5/ 30,568.43 12.4 1 1
•
14151 tempkmFm comP.po/uRANCE . - • . .00' • . ,. - .- ..: 3 " 7. 7 - 29, 282; 00 - I --- • .5,698.00 - 83.7" - - •,A
I • • s , . . . . . . . ... .. ., . 1 1
( " n15? I ugh4r 0 YMEN T COMP. :• ' ' .- ' • .. - - .00', i , ,..:',., '....,: ,1•' :,■• ... ',. '•''' . .00 ; ..'. ' •.' • 00 . - • 00 . . • P.
v.:. G7; .0 l'...1
s' **** PERSONAL AFovIcFA 72.205.59 T 11879 1726 17;4
----- .i.,
, .
( V.• . . .
. .
' 4 214 oFEICF SUPPLIES ' 1.002.09 . . ' 5,630.00 - 1,002.09 4,627.91 17.8 1.1
4 22 4 GENE:PAI..sUPPLiti - - -,-- - .. -7- 77: - - - ;7 9 8 - 5..q1 .-- 7 - 7. 7.7 7.77777 77 7. ---- 2 7 ..4 4 0 - .'06 - 7 1,1100 . 60 - 7 '. 26;039;80 - • 5.1 • -•- 1-
(. 7" 1 1221 C ' ' . ' 1- '• -', ' .• .. .00 • •'' ', ‘‘:1,,....:: :.•: .;:::'.4.: .;`'..,-' '. 31t9066 00 '` . ... : • .00 ' . 3. .0 :...:
2:1
477, •r)T FUELS ; LURPIcANTS ._,/., '- ,' , -. 55.10 '::: •';'.,,...,f .:: -,; :=" 55:10, ; 42,394,90 .1 Inn
•
4 22 C 3.146.26 __-_--,
1 IOTHING-PERS.EQUIPmENT S 371n6;2 -- 2.451;7a - 5.2
( 4 224 SAFETY $uPPLIFs . .00 . * 1,600,00 . .00 1,600.00 .0
:" 4 225 SmAll TnnL PURCHASES . 09.88 . . 2,650.00 44.88 2,600.12 1.9 kJ
4230 EouIP.mAINT. X REPAIR - 415.14 - 777 - 7: - : -- , T - 163605600 ,-----,- -- 16;169.86 - 2;6
4 231 RinG."AINT L FEPA/R .
' • . 501.34 ',.. • .• , . -. * 10.200.00 501.3 ' . 9,698.66 4.9 I
4212 VFHIcLEmA/NT, t REPAIR - H .. , - .687,87 ,-- -,: -,.-.:- :-. ; 19,640,00 ' ° 687.87 .' (.18;952.13 3.5
4 .-.7-:.
sysum mAtNT. 413.1A ri az - 41 - 3:ta - - 0;086:82 Sr:2 07
. .
.2; -7 1 4240 PnAD MATERIALS . .00 5.000.00 .00 5,000.00 .0 ,-
''. -1 n2u1 RAITHING mATERTALS .00 ' 7,000.00 .00 7,000.00 .0'
4:4 •
- ii 7 7 F Ai_ . tr il K ' - - - - ------' - ----- 7- ' - . - - - .00 35;000.00 ' : ' - - - " - .00 '- - 35,00000 .0 - --
( 1- ; 42113 RooNDS mAJNT. MATERIALS .00 •
. - 2,000.00 - .00 2,000.00 .0 1:2
3 :I 4 ICE CONTROL MATERIALS 1,100.63 , • .: - - 50700.00 1;100.63 3,899.37 22.0
1 4250 AIGNStsTRIPING mATERIALS .00 - 5 - ,'6007:00 . .00 - 5;60 - 07,00 - - .0 -
. .
I"
71, 'A" SU & PFPAIRs . 8.377.4 . 0 • 199,515.00 8,792.09 190.722.91 4•4
. _. . _
1
4310 LFGAI SEPVICEA • 3,827.16 . ' - 25.000.00 3,827.16 21,172.84 15.3 In:
In;
4311 AunIT ' EI/T. SERVICES - .00 - -- . 6,000.00 - .00 , 6,000,00 .0
1,-
--,.) ultp FmGTvFFRING SERVICES , 1.157.74 . -- I2 - 0166:60 - - -- -- - 1;357:70 - -- - - - 10T682:30 --- 11 - .3 r,
. , ail EnP nEsInN x SOFTwAPE .00 60.00 • .00 60.00 .0 ,
F
'7 Alta pi Atm/ for, .00 10.000.00 .00 10,000.00 .0
.. .... . . .. .
ulic nimFP PRil AERVICE,§ 3.5 - . . -- '' - 48,800.00 -- 3.785.25 : 45,01 7.8 -- ;
• . , ...1 ' 1
' . .
451 k*** PW/FFSSUINAL sERVIES . 8.777.61 __ 101,860.00 . 8.970.11 92,889.89 8.8
...e
J 9 .
4320 pnsr . AcF 293.55 • 3,430.00 , 693.55 2.736.45 20.2
.
• 4321 . 1.035.17 • . 13,610.00 . 1,082.57 12,527.43 8.0 -
. ...;
..-•,! ,40,* cnmmOmICATIONS - 1.328.72 17.040.00 1.776.12 15,263.88 10.4
' • , 157
;CO
_ ... - _ _ ...---- ..----. ..... _. ........ __
9 2. giii; ir>i'vEi. i-•iFFV.q • i • --- • 8;896.6n ----- - 560:20 • - - 7,929; - 80 - - 6;6 - " r.o
70
....,
21 •••-•
**,.., TRAvFl. 560.20 8.490.00 '560.20 7,929.80 6.6
1 1:.
-4 qtSn i FaAL NnTICFA ROmLIquINc 621.18 9.020.00 623.38 8,396.62 6.9
. . "Is
, Id
.. ..... . .. .. . . ... .. ..._ _
- -
'
t 1 CITY OF CNAKnPFE E X P E N D I T U R E 'R E P 0 R T AS OF 2 -29 -80 PAGE 2
• _
( , ! FLONn 01 GENERAL FIIN1' C 1.1 R R E N T M 0 N T H :- - - Y E A R TO D A T E 1- •
.._AC IESCRIPTION - __..APPROPRIATION • ACTUAL ...._.___._VARIANCE PCT APPROPRIATION _.__ _... ACTUAL ,_ ._ -- --._- V __ PCT..__ _ I.
• 4351 PPT►ITINn R RF.PRnDIJCTIOI . 85.05 5 85.05 4. 1.7 1..!
P
°; •••• PPII'i11.MC ' PFPPnn,ICT - .. ~768.43 -7- -. ._ 14.020,00 _._ ... 708.43 .__ 13,311.57 5:1 . • _ �9 1 .
• 4360 f FN R 1 IAR TN$URANCE _ - 20.00 " - 13, 00 20 00 13 00 . ,,
P •
� . - _...- _. ._.. __- - -- .�- - - - - - -_ -
•
m 4361 PpnP. R RnTIER TNSIIRANCF. - .00 -- ° - --__ ' 6 _ - _ - - ..._.
r I, 4367 VFHICLE R FPUTP.TMS. .00 13.281.00 .00 13.281.00 .0 "
' * ** ?iL 20,06 36,081.00_ - 20 .00 36,461.00 .1 : ::i
• ,.t Vi^ -
1 I 4370 FLECTPTrITY - 1:962.53 22,175.00 • 2.069.16' 20,105.84 9.3
Iii 4371 raATUPAL r. >z ► + Tr 3.130.07 19,630:00 • 3,i - - ` • -- 16;529.93 - '15:9 ' ° - ' , ,,
• 1377 v:ATEP .00 1.675.00 .00 1.675.00 .0 1' •
" 4373 GAPR,DISPOSAL /OIIMP CHrS. 7.216.07 88,775.00 7,216.07 81,558. 8.1 1.
- 4:113 • 0 • i M!0 RENTAL - .00 • - 1.400.00 .00 1.400.00 �p .._.. • ( 4381 RUTLOTt'G.RENTAL _ „.•
'• .'00 ` - 500.00 - • '" .00 5 00.00 • . 0 - Ir : •
' 131 {7 MACNTNFPY PENTA1. .416.00 , � <.:' ._ -- . 3,250.00 ___ 416.00 .. - - -- : ._ 2,834.00 _ . 12.8 -- -
03A'c fFFICE EQI!IPMFNT DENTAL .00 3.700 00 .b S�700.00 ` .d c.
( , - 4304 EDP En11TPMENT RENTAL 723.92 . 20,600.00 723.92 19,876.08 3.5 -, 1
. - -- • ---77------- - - -- _.-- -- -- - --- -
*iri* • - (IT11 )T 1E§ R RE NTAL S 13 "R,59'_.._ _.. _.._ _ _. ___ . • 7 --- 164' - "• "13 151,1794;78 8,2 -- - i
4390 a< SCHOOLS 1 ?06:68 13.825•00 2,408.18 11,416.82 17.4 I"
I
11301 nUFg R IIRSCPIPTI0N8 - 0 - - - -`- 270.0 - 5; 875'. - - _ - - -- 585. 00 ---- - - " - 5 - ,290.00 -- 1 -_ - 1 37
•
f 1139, 1 T(.ENSER .00 100.00 .00 100.00 .0 ;rl
� 4391 RnnKS R PA'PHLFTS 126.00 .2,125.00 144.25 1,980,75 6.8 I
:' 430(. 4rTINf FX.PFNSE -- -. _ 43.78 - 805.00 --- • 43.70 761.30 5.4
1a_ ., +* Cf1MF.Rf.HL1pLS.BP0'<S 1.650.38 22,730.00 3,181.13 19.548.87 14.0 ( '''
r k (1110 .IANTTOPTAL SERVTCFS 125.86 1,130.00 125.86 1,004.14 11.1 An
. 1411 CIIRPFrfT USE CHARGES .00 850.00 .00 850.00 .0 , ,.;
• 25 � � 91 9001) TESTS -- - - -. ._.._.. -._.. - - --_ -- _. __..__.. ....40.00 _ _.-__.__._.__ _- T- --- . ---•• -- --- . ._...- 0od.00 - _,. . . 40:00 . _ . 360;00 " -- 10.0 - - -...
( I 4400 1-T CELI-ANFnlls 12.00 . - .00 12.00 .12.00- •
• , e I *4111. npis N RnARD ILJAMT7o 177.86 27380 - _ . _ - 177.86 - Gan T4_."- .7.5 - -s3 • 1 u50A P( nr_S. P STPIICTIIPES .00 ' .00 .00 .00
1 11500 tAPITAL f7THER .0o .00 - - .. .00 - ;00
1 4510 CAPITAL VEHICLES .00 63,750.00 ,00 63,750 .0 ':
`
_I_ FnI!IPMENT 1.759.31 39,860.00 1,759.31 38,100.69 4.4 I1. ,
, IIII 4517 CAPTTAI _OFFICE FnUIPMENT - - -- � _...._ .. -. 1.687.90 ...... 6,900.00. _...- -•-- 1,687,90- -- --- - __
- S.212.102U .S-- -- --- - :3
;; 4510 fTHFP 1AP0OVFr-E'JTS .00 .00 .00 . .00 h , 1
'. .. *. CAPTTAL P. TMPRnvMNTR 3,447.21 110,510.00 3,447.21 107,062.79 3.1 •� 1:.I
-i
__,4611 TNTFPESTPAYIIFNT9 _ ,00 2.400.00 • .00 2,400.00 .0 -
,,,
• 0 ..._ 5 50."00•_ _...0.__.
��I qj�1 bF 4MnriFN1 IRn�IFERS � ,n0 30 .550.:0 .00 3d; o
1 1910 , 'FOCHANrISF Fr1P RF;SALE •00 1,700.00 • •00 . 1,700.00 .0
1 19 PFFLIMnS .00 700.00 .00 700.00 .0 _
.4981 SALES TAY • .00 .00 .00 .00
1'•"; 4900 MTSCFLL ANFf)IIS .00 3.'100,00 .00 3,100.00 .0 1 "
;;
. (. ------- -- ..-:----'--
4 .
1
191 CITY OF SHAKOPFE EXPENDITURE .FUERORT AS OF 2 • PAGE 3
FUND 0 t aF. rutio
• . . , - C 1Z
3 __ACCOLINT/PF.SCRIPTION . _,_„ AOPP / T . TOZ: ;!:?-.... E. :4CITUA-P14.. 0 ' ‘.. i ' , 1 : H v :R ,:' . APOR * OP - RIATION Y F ' - T AC 0 TOAL 0 A 1. ..-: VARIANCE - PCT
13 4 r,
• • *
( n iN491 CONTINGENCY
• • . • 00 7 - • 110,000.00 • . , 110,000,00 .0 6
0 P • • . .
..
, . 00 , ' 4•••• "" *?''.• ' ' •••• - 1 48 450 06 - ----•-• 7 - - ;00 — - - 148450;00 -. - ;0 - - - - t)
**** OTHFP EXPVIDI TURES , : ... 'T'''. .. . . • '., ... , -' ..,,,.....- ' , • -
. ( 3
11
1 ' ' : ' ' ' ' . ' ' • ...■' ' .....:': ... ' ; - '' ''' k' ' '''.- . '' -'-'' "C''' :>...., ':.•.'`;':',.'"••;/. , ,, - :•,„ 1 •„ .' • ',. :t ' - 4 ': .. - 4 .: ‘ * '' .
. .- * ' ' . . . , • • ..--....----- - ---- — -- - . - - . -... -- — ....-----I
110.7nt.99 10337711.00 , J.617, J1.8 i.
I ,c
:,. FlINO TOTALS
. . . .
. -
- . It...
V II
• . . ,,, „. , .. . , -- .
I; . .. . , ..
12.
. .
. . . ,
1 " ' . . . .
I 1 . •
•
•
. . .
' . 2
• ::.( :7-. . • . . , .• 4 . . . .
• - . . . • . ,
, 3 . . . , . . „ - . . ,., •
,-.i• 3 --; . - .
. . ,
-
. • 3
...., . . .
•
• I 3
' . •
: 1 i•-•1 . . . - . - . s
- - 1•••
i 1
, .
• 4*
i.1
.- •
•
.1 r • . .
•
..„ ,
. ,.. .
"" ( '....' •
•
' •:',
-,...
* . . •
1 ; .... :,
V' - . --
' .- . . . .
) t l' • . . .
SI . . , . •
• _1131
1.1 . 15
• ' t ,
. ■
1 .,..
}.. I .
•
. s
.111 IC5(
— — — . -
_
'. .
.
.7.
. 1,...,
..... ___ ___ ___...... .. .... .. . . . . .
i.: