HomeMy WebLinkAboutMay 06, 1980 TENTATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MAY 6, 1980
Mayor Harbeck presiding.
1] Roll Call and invocation at 7:30 P.M.
2] Approval of the Minutes of April 8th, 15th, and 22nd, 1980
3] Communications:
a] Priscilla Merryman
b] Arnold Theis
4] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers:
a] Cncl.Colligan from the Fire Dep't.; Jt.'Seven Man Committee
and the Planning Commission
b] Cncl.Hullander from Scott County Criminal Justice Advisory Comm.
c] Cncl.Lebens from the Community Services Board
d] Cncl.Leroux from the Shakopee School Board
e] Cncl.Reinke from the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
f] Mayor Harbeck from Scott County Board of Commissioners
5] RECOGNITION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANYONE PRESENT IN THE AUDIENCE
WHO DESIRES TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA
6] Old Business:
7] Planning Commission Recommendations:
8] Routine Resolutions and Ordinances:
9] New Business:
a] Central Business District Study
• b] Energy & Transportation Ad Hoc Committee
c] Cable T.V. Ad Hoc Committee - Res. No. 1600
d] Subdivision Ordinance Ad Hoc Committee - Res. No. 1608
e] 1979 Police Annual Report
f] Sale of City Land North of Halo 2nd
g] Application for Gambling License - American Legion
h] Appointment's to the Industrial Commercial Commission
i] Ice Arena
j] City Engineer status report on public improvements
k] Holmes Street Project - Approve Plans & Specs and Order
Advertisement for Bids - Res. No. 1602
1] Temporary Employees
m] 4th and Minnesota Street Project - Easement
10] Consent Business:
a] Summer Hours
11] Other Business:
a] Appoint Acting Administrator for May 7th through 9th
• b]
c]
12] Adjourn to . . .
•
Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
TENTATIVE AGENDA •
SPECIAL SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MAY 6, 1980
Mayor Harbeck presiding.
1] Roll Call at 5:00 P.M.
2] Joint Meeting with the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
a] Watermain - 10th Avenue to 3rd Avenue
b] County Road 16 /Gorman Street watermain
c] Paint specifications for watertank
3] Other business
4] Adjourn
Douglas. S. Reeder
City Administrator
4
I
TENTATIVE AGENDA
SHAKOPEE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
SPECIAL SESSION MAY 6, 1980
Chrm.Hullander presiding.
1] Roll Call at 7:30 P.M.
2] Accept special meeting call
3] Approve Minutes of March 4, March 18, April 1, and April 15, 1980
4] 4th and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project
a] Discussion of the removal of the Smoke House from the project
site (requested by Margaret McFarlane)
b] Discussion of terms for sale of lots and homes to contractors
and future owners
c] Discussion of contractor proposals for homes
d] Discussion of policy on storage of goods as part of relocation
benefits
e] Approval and authorization for payment of following reloca-
tion claims:
1) Rainy Water Conditioning, % Arthur Fonder - $447.00
2) Fonder Cleaning Systems, % Charles Fonder - $312.38
3) Rein Truck Line, Inc., 70 Castanguay - $10,000.00
4) Reis Tool Works, % George H. Ries, Jr. - $168.00
5) Jeurissen Brothers Blacktopping,
% Dennis & Donald Jeurissen - $1,170.00
5] Approval of bills:
a] Von Klug and Associates, 4th & Minnesota Neighborhood
Revitalization Project, March Services $922.50
b] National Association of Housing and Redevelopment
Officials, purchase of Directory of Housing and
Community Development Agencies $12.00
6] Other Business:
7] Adjourn
Jeanne Andre
H. R. A. Director
PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Special Session Shakopee, Minnesota March 4, 1980
Chrmn. Hullander called the meeting to order at 8 :01 PM with Comm.
Reinke, Colligan, Lebens and Leroux present. Also present: City
Admin., Douglas S. Reeder; HRA Director, Jeanne Andre; City Eng.,
H. R. Spurrier and City Attorney, Julius A. Coller, II.
Reinke /Lebens moved to approve the calling of the Special meeting for
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux /Lebens moved to approve the minutes of February 5, 1980, as
kept. Motion carried unanimously.
Discussion was held on moving the Smoke House now located in the 4th
and Minnesota Project to Murphy's Landing. HRA Director stated that
the Minnesota Valley Restoration Project does not have funds available
for which they could pay to move this building. The cost of moving •
this Smoke House would be approximately $2,000. If it were not moved
in the next few weeks, it would be destroyed when .demolition began.
Alternative ways of funding this move other than through the HRA Fund
were discussed.
Lebens /Reinke moved to table until more information could be received
on whether or not there could be other funding'available from which
to pay for the moving of the Smoke House. Motion carried unanimously.
HRA requested the Director to suggest to Ms. MacFarlane of the Minnesota.
Valley Restoration Project that funds be solicited from special interests
concerned with preparation and sale of retail and wholesale meat.
Leroux /Colligan moved to request the City Council to waive the platting
fee and Conditional Use Permit fee of Macey's 2nd Addition. Motion•
carried unanimously.
Reinke /Leroux moved to approve the adjustment of the $11,395 contract
with Von Klug and Associates to $14,890; thereby extending the amount
by $3, for the additional expenditures.
Roll Call: Ayes - Leroux, Reinke, Colligan, Hullander
Noes - Lebens Motion carried
An invitation has been prepared by the HRA Director which will be
extended to all contractors advertising the 4th and Minnesota
Neighborhood Revitalization Project seeking their interest and proposals
on building these homes under the 235 Mortgage Program. She asked
the HRA to review this invitation and asked for their suggestions.
No suggestions were made.
Discussion was held on the Cooperative Agreement with the Scott County
Housing and Redevelopment Authority.
Lebens /Reinke moved to approve payment of the following bills: 1) George
Castanguay, $97,701.00 for purchase of Rein Truck Lines (4th and
Minnesota Project); 2) Scott County Treasurer, $2,299.81, for payment
of delinquent taxes on Rein Truck Lines at the time of purchase;
3
Proceedings of the Shakopee March 4, 1980
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Page -2-
3) Al Rybak, $43,000, for purchase of property (4th and Minnesota
Project); 4) Von Klug and Associates, $1,412.79, for rofessional
services; 5) Paul Wermerskirchen Abstract Co., Inc., $59.20, for
continuation of Abstract Certificate Recertification for Siebenaler
property; 6) Julius A. Coller, $57.00, cash advance for Eminent
Domain Proceedings.
Roll Call: Ayes - unanimous
Noes - none Motion carried
Reinke / Lebens offered Resolution No. 80 -2, A Resolution of the Shakopee
Housing Redevelopment Authority to Authorize the Registration of
Title to Certain Real Estate'Herein Described, and moved for its
adoption. City Attorney summarized the resolution. Motion carried
unanimously.
Lebens /Colligan moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting
adjourned at 8:21 PM.
Jeanne Andre
Executive HRA Director
•
3
• •HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
•
Special• Session Shakopee, Minnesota March 18, 1980
Chrmn. Hullander called the meeting to order at 7 :35 PM with Comm.
Reinke, Colligan and Lebens present. Absent: Comm. Leroux. Also
present: Mayor Harbeck; City Admin., Douglas S. Reeder; City Eng.,
H. R. Spurrier; HRA Director, Jeanne Andre and Assistant City Attorney,
Rod Krass.
Reinke /Colligan moved to accept the special meeting call. Motion
carried unanimously.
Ass't. City Attorney noted the changes made in the contract for the
acquisition and sale of land for the redevelopment project (Kmart
Warehouse).
Colligan /Reinke offered Resolution No. 80 -3, A Resolution Approving
An Amendment Of Contract For Sale Of Land For Private Redevelopment
In Valley Industrial Park Redevelopment Project No. 1 (Kmart Warehouse),
and moved for its adoption. Assistant City Attorney summarized the
resolution.
Roll - Call: Ayes - Colligan, Hullander, Reinke
Noes - bac �8� Motion carried
Ass't. City Atty. explained the documents which would authorize
conveyance of land for the Kmart Warehouse Project.
Reinke /Colligan offered Resolution No. 80 -4, A Resolution Authorizing
Conveyance Of Land Pursuant To Contract (Kmart Warehouse), and moved
for its adoption. City Admin. read the resolution.
Roll Call: Ayes - Hullander, Reinke, Colligan
Noes - Lebens Motion carried
The HRA reported on the Financial Condition of the Shakopee
HRA in 1980. She indicated a beginning balance of $70,099.03. With
anticipated revenues from interest and mill levy receipts and
anticipated expenses for salaries, adjustments from 1979 and general
operations, the anticiapted year -end balance will be $72,599.03.
Discussion was held regarding the following criteria for the Shakopee
235 Homeownership Program adopted on February 6, 1979: 1) Individuals
or families that meet HUD's definition of low and moderate income as
established for their community development programs; 2) Individuals
or families who are displaced from their residence as a result of the
Community Development Project; 3) Residency requirement - individuals
or families who either live or work within the City of Shakopee.
Preference will be given on the basis of this factor until 75% of the
new homes are occupied by families meeting this requirement; 4) Home-
ownership requirement - individuals or families who have not owned a
home within the last five years (not including mobile homes); 5) Individ-
•
of the Shakopee March 18, 980
Proceedings p
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Page -2-
uals or families who qualify for the State's Housing Assistance Fund.
Preference will be given for this factor as needed to achieve the State's
goal of having 25% of the fund occupied by families aided through HAF.
Colligan /Lebens moved to change criterion three to read: 3) Residency
requirement - individuals or families who either live or work within
the City of Shakopee, preference will be given on this factor until
100% of the new homes are occupied by families meeting this requirement;
and to accept the HRA Director's interpretation of the previously
adopted criteria as follows: No. 5) regarding families who qualify for
the State's Housing Assistance Fund will be in effect only for homes
built under state financing; No. 2) regarding displaced families will
be given absolute preference; No. 4) regarding previous homeownership
will be considered a preferential criterion. Motion carried unanimously.
Reinke /Lebens moved to approve the following bills: 1) VonKlug and Asso.,
for February services (4th & MN Project) - $570.98; 2) VonKlug and Asso.,
for their third party services in February - $1575.00.
Roll Call: Ayes - unanimous
Noes - none Motion carried
Colligan /Lebens moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting
adjourned at 8:35 PM.
{
Jeanne Andre
Executive HRA Director
PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Regular Session Shakopee, Minnesota April 1, 1980
Chrmn. Hullander called the meeting to order at 7 :35 PM with Comm.
Reinke, Colligan and Leroux present. Absent: Comm. Lebens. Also
present: Mayor Harbeck; City Admin., Doug Reeder; City Planner, Tim
Keane; Finance Director, Gregg Voxland; City Eng., H. R. Spurrier and
City Attorney, Julius A. Coller, II.
There was no business to be conducted at this time.
Colligan /Reinke moved to adjourn to Tuesday, April 15, 1980. Motion
carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 7:37 PM.
Jeanne Andre
HRA Director
PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Adj. Reg. Session Shakopee, Minnesota April 15, 1980
Chrmn. Hullander called the meeting to order at 7:35 PM with Comm.
Reinke, Colligan and Leroux present. Absent: Comm. Lebens. Also
present: Mayor Harbeck; City Admin., Douglas S. Reeder; City Planner,
Tim Keane and Attorney Phil Kanning.
Comm. Leroux suggested that the ordinance be checked which adopted the
scheduling of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority's meetings.
There ' w4s - n5 business to be conducted at this time.
Leroux / Colligan moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting
adjourned at 7:36 PM.
•
Jeanne Andre
HRA Director
y a.2
MEMO TO: Members of Housing & Redevelopment Authority
FROM: Jeanne Andre, H.R.A. Director
RE: Removal of Smokehouse from Fourth and Minnesota Project Site
DATE: May 2, 1980
The removal of the Smokehouse is an issue we still must resolve.
Margaret Mac Farlane of the Minnesota Valley Restoration Project has
requested the H.R.A,. to donate $2,000.00 to cover the expense of
moving the Smokehouse to her project.
The H.R.A. discussed this issue at the March 4, 1980 meeting.
The request was tabled so that Ms. Mac Farlane would have the opportunity
to explore other means of financing this moving expense and so that the
H.R.A. could review the current financial condition of its fund.
Based on a recent phone conversation with Ms. Mac Farlane, I believe
she has not found another source of funding. The report on our financial
condition presented to you on March 18, 1980, indicated that the H.R.A.
fund had approximately $70,000 at the beginning of this year, and should
have a similar balance at the end of this year.
Ms. Mac Farlane may attend the meeting to present further informa-
tion regarding her request.
JA /jsc
•
MEMO TO: Shakopee HRA - -- ----
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive HRA Director
RE: Conditions and Terms of Sale of Lots in Fourth
and Minnesota Project to Contractors and Home
Owners
DATE: May 2, 1980
I recommend the following terms and conditions for the sale
of lots in the Fourth. and Minnesota Project:
1) Purchase price to contractors of $1.00.
2) Deed restrictions on-.1ots:
a) Requiring contractor to build home, as approved by
HRA, to be sold under 235 Mortgage Program.
b) Requiring contractor to sell home to buyer indent -
ified by the HRA staff and eligible for 235 mort-
gage financing.
c) Establishing a party -wall agreement (for owners of
duplex dwellings)'.
d) Establishing the following lot repayment schedule
to be implemented if the homeowner sells the dwelling
within five years of the date it was purchased.
1) Home owned under 1 year - full payment of lot value
2) Home owned between 1 & 2 yrs. - repay 3/4 lot value
3) Home owned between 2 & 3 yrs. - repay 1/2 lot value
4) Home owned between 3 & 5 yrs. - repay 1/4 lot value
5) Home owned 5 yrs. or more - no repayment required
JA/ j iw
. 9
• .Ct • "
'
•
MEMO TO: Shakopee HRA
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director
RE: Review of Contractor Proposals -
Fourth and Minnesota Project
DATE: May 2, 1980
Attached are summary sheets outlining basic information about
the proposals I have received for homes to be built in the
Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project.
Of course, these summaries cannot explain the site plan or
floor plan, but they can give you a comparison of the basic
size of the homes and amenities included.
Our original invitation for proposals was quite general.
While this provided a good variation in proposals, it also
makes the proposals difficult to compare. Therefore, I
adjusted the proposals to try and make them more comparable.
Summary sheets reflecting these adjustments are also attached,
and are identified as "adjusted proposals ". Outlined below
are the more significant steps..I took in making these adjust-
ments.
A. Removed:
1) Plans requiring full basements (as our cost to blast
will be quite high).
2) Kitchen applicances included in proposal beyond stove
hood (as these could potentially be provided by new
owners).
3) Allowance for landscapping and sod (as this can be
paid for out of CDBG Project costs).
1 4) The contractors allowance for points (the amount
included varied from 0 to 6).
5) The contractors allowance for building permit (our
estimate is much more accurate).
B. Added:
1) Double window protection, at minimum.
2) Storm doors.
3) 80,000 BTU furnace
Shakopee HRA -2- May 2, 1980 c
4) Asphalt drive
5) Extra 3/4 bath in most bedroom plans (required
by FHA) .
6) Allowance of three points at closing
7) Allowance for Building Permit
Since the proposals do vary and some of the alternates I have
included or excluded are not part of the written contractor
proposals, I would like the HRA to select the top proposal for
each site and allow me to negotiate final definite specifications
and prices to bring back to the HRA for final approval. This
procedure will also allow the building inspector to carefully
review the specifications of the plans selected.
JA/jiw
Attachments
•
•
J ( ( 1 c i( hJ ( ) (. s) (5) ( )
y � ' 38 00 0 +6v 2 /3l` J/1i{ 7Jc2X 3,0300 (zprcp) 3 geloo 38a00 36 So0 37 %Z;
on c nA p ro posoils' • c. �,'�,
L-4 torn '1" L, G1' r, l(, . J. /v11' 'lc v Goodvvih Luc kic OR<file
•
No. square feet /oog 14-52- / 7 l 2 7 1
aS lao8 716,,
w.'a .6,
No. finished square feet /00K 9 0 8(o+ c 1006 716.7!
Cost /square foot 39, 0 0 26 .17 p ?.s I z". 90 .38: /9 i 52A
Cost /finished square foot 3,,06 3 -1,59) -1 S.OZ 3 -ei 36./9 Sz.9E
-
, ;p/ app a-rp
No. square feet storage No )- 30 k 'WY 740 A./0 he. , Vohc,
Bedroom 1 - square feet / /87 5 r;.•.�� � /(02,;? S /3G. 132
ir,cL. cllsi Y Lir c(o,5(1 __ �...
Bedroom 2 - square feet /2_0,'15 /¢3. �n• •: /54.&6 /Z9. / l2l 74 -
Bedroom 3 - square feet - i
Bedroom 4 - square feet
1
Kitchen
_
_ _._-------- _.._..___ r0.,1/.... 1-01111
) C Ma ra{ 6100 0 i ro1 r\94.
Appliances N0)7L hood albwancz ✓(6,; A.Jo»e,
allowitncc f
Floor ' Il'ho lc ct
12-P0 l'hG!(t�;n Vlh�rl IrY10�{ 1 Mol <,„,
Cabinets r nAi G
�e � h� .� `" p le "' calc w
-- - � pa r h'c be'
, , C aS. y r C. / �j / For wit( f
=--• -- - r— ___ -� ...:_,.- • -_ - -- p � ,� f'd.h,(( 7OYhli( ," .iOrrrla.Cal w /nln51l "e
Bath Iii - r i 1 ri'ber 1H 5•:
a116w ((y(1 . ,$ J 7s .
iterA +io 1
Floor c
t l1(�,06 .1;1-,-- / , 'nol .r� floor 4166 4* ' Iihole�,•Y
mirror
Mirror, Vanity Yrs Yes `f (t, Y( 5
h`o1 v r ; r _._ -._ __ _ ..
allOW(. W0' ea11X1 P/75
Floor Finish 1' 1il /(ih Co Y (� c c p
_ a0 ___ 6 . _ I {lour a (0 14 p - }- car c. f I.
rnb ho a „ /
Woodwork F`n;> .c R5 h a ho 111 ° 0a IL oak oak_
Lighting .Allow -7 200, o p 5300.06 r _: — -g -
Heatiri �crc{(( foyer(( �',, I Torte,” (1 t.W- r, „....., .. ,R ....;k A . �::' �-
g a 8r1 f 4 1- ovcra ( a vs �iarrrsf
2.A Rru..2. 5 _- �'t .1 .. ...1......,_ .. ovopare _ too 00 ie �
Electrical Service O —"``—
l00 th,p l00 an , pi Io a -4 -7 )120 Amp, .2001/40
_ 1 DO um p
Hotwater Heater ` JD R ' l Jas - '_.. l
.__- -- -- f nip
1 c� <i s 1 a 4 90(.;
a5
..�...�.. -�� ._ / 3•a J`l I 1 _3 v y. ^. 1 .. __• 30_ I _- - 3 v , a f - 30 e I
Garage 61.- • / � r � - - . J
«._ 5J hn �C' apb lG _._ doLr /G a104rb/C sr)hc s,r (e
Driveway blaclb p is V a 5 pha II” black ke acpG, a II' C yaAsl,,(1 (
Storm windows - w .... _- - <(oubl� - I'm . .r. . { - . _.. . - - - - -- ddv Cu �rgkrcl •
Cow.h cQ , . -zf�(! -G. hs.a•1(t�tct — n�G Isv h 1 � 7Ti
• Storm doors . ' add No — A { A l 35. e 8 4(7 _ - 5
Y6 5
• � .l d . . ..e r rn; . j 100 0 (10 N.o _. __- ______ _ 'k _ _ r
I 9� a.t 1 I V /l0 0
Exterior Finish rnns0,1.lc. c/ r,,nsoh, /� G ' �r -.. A -�.y—
_J . r, P 4 ti Mfhti M MkSorr C
L andscaping - _. __ _...__ - -_ -------L-----_ r -_..
No R�r( /00 s
•
Sod Ado 1`0 I Ade {. $500 -F-vr+4- f
m T �
r o h1 W0 f ._— I 1e5 -/ro�1 ',hie I. S1 /
•
_
Sellers Fee �• n1"5. `f pf5 Novo _ 1 _ 5 rfs
Exclusions 1/ # y y '•
Ot ` -- _._. __ 2re! wood -1-,-.1916 r�ai o owe erlcrl .jr
• heck adcl Sso r ,,,ho d a((!t '40-'-
DCre, Ko
o �l uc1Gl $7 0 add 0500 01, dd1 1
'Y pi( PA r '"
{ �L�U�/, �C�'
Wir(/); •rc Frf'd (J
•
/50
r - I r 1 Zr-�,: r- z
Z- 2.- l_ l /- f E 2 2
4131z S1 E.'<�' I 14/01 4-.3 1 44 4; 03o 4' 3030 4•,000 ¢000
on q r',1 Y / rU O S st 15 /
✓ a I'IAf f�'ae�V�er, Lauren-1 1 IIe s' M r lle �.Gc( /c1 ruck/
-- -.� ___ .. _ .....: _. (t2..QQ 1_. - 0 9 ____ _ 7- 8
No. square feet 2; 0 zi - I Bq I, (5q0 Iq', 1 2060 1 SS15
No . fini shed squai'- - 1. 1 5 ?': 1 3 2 - ( .., 130S.. .. - /13 ti / 040 It 8S
Cost /square foot /i,,r4 .7_3,11 d•7 ),' l'..; 2.5.1 ai•03 _ 30h81
Cost /finished squ, 33. )./.j • 33.2 1 q� . _. - -- �� ' - 43,Z10 f0.
- .
O. C. Opp• ePp �r.P• App app a-y>p.
`
No. square feet ,s.. ft _ - -__ `� , f g g 5 €-- 6 39-8 3. 1..__. 3gt) - - ____ ____ z(1 o
Bedroom 1 - sq: i / z.(..c,- 130 l0 (•q .. l64 IS 1 73,).5 1 ¢8.4
• / 41, / /4,- /
, f- /
I
F /03.5 00 _()0 (inr(r, <l 6y,c(:C(iu� .. ._1 1 C� --- ll ^ �v
Bedroom 2 - sq•
Bedroom 3 sq. fr l 1 l' / .30 1 o (v /35. p /3 5.8 1 52. /0 0
Bedroom 4 - s t i/, ' "r
r
q >L ( v ` /U3, 5 3 /32- 1 32 12o ) 1 ` - 3
Kitchen .
•
_ __ ._.._ _ _ . I Fo (l am O r <r1,1 , vAw< , ran16 ra-�<li
Appliances /)o /Vo I r a I1'
. . " - -- - . -', . rts '/ _.,.... /PWi rti
i r�f /.
_...., Floor �� v +h %� . 1 V ny/ i � U < L
—_ Itila!�nlA'i! �(` y r<rrrc l f ivio lr urr, liholtcr Ir'>, o l {„,., l�re�c'
- - !pnf bop Ili Vi i OAL wiVII Oak- W /'h 0Ak ,41 0,4 wrl"
Cabinets i F vrw+rtq
IRS hL ; IO.n,ln
.._ --- _.��_., -. ._ . -..._. ..._. ... -_ ,....._._._.. n _ 0 u /'Dr Mi t t a F' (j rnu rA -{o, °h „ G4
Bath lr fr'bcro (ass ,+,',t 6., in lc r,, k, b
v,' / V'v,yf 4 140 0 ((Ylerr u t rrraw,o
Floor - l Ih1A1 Ai ;iv 1∎1‘ 161 0 1 •t , .' ,, 1 I;n0 leu+.,
1!! 11.1i ..... _... i.. '`v . -
Mirror, Vanity '(es
Floor Finish . Gay ix. r carpe ,tllo Caro. f cArpr cc( rpcf' Carp(f
n,2. n o nal —...
Woodwork rr‘k.11 r'i/ r r,Aho C� f� "1s {v 1 0 k -
__ y 2.e, or. u. O
I 00 (c Dslr� OA IL r
Lighting Allow h 14- �'x-• 14 fc�I . 10 /
r7 f�JU 4�OD
Heating 1 r o y (ei(A ve {vre(d ,.'. /Or red �R for l o r ee i f ... (F <� ror __. _ R _ (er('
g q2. For
Ir S!yo 6r't. G0,o0o 811 _Pi ODo 817 .t15
Electrical Service) -p . '
I 1 5 0 a-r 15o a,+�pl> 100 Arne! 100 el ,- 1-p I V O Ah,p /00 i DO r
Hotwater Heater 5" — j < e
nli, _ 30 4 1 licr5130 9.11 n5 30 4 I qA �0 a 1 , 3 1` y45 �
Garage �� — - °- �`` � .._ �. �f a _ .�
- .
514 b S l S 1 n I c et oL� f ad/c.„G,�,
Driveway _ I --
Y 9 y(tvr I JrA ye' I blaCt1 ` 451)11 , r'' A51111A lr
.
Storm windows & �-r,', l6
Y - I"h , v 11 drrub(c. • i datth
� fAZC. _ he)? 1_, c r yr 1�
�l��G a Cavr' b 1he ` ? 1_., _. 41. ..c pA re. (4 2.4 winG(r. 1a '(.C/
• Storm doors Yr Yes • No i ads( ar(d L I T
V �
r u; Ids �"�' - - -- — t ;� $ I5s $asu 1 5 Y -e 5
Btrs -er rent ' -,� : a _ y_ _ — ! U I �'J N a v, _ _ (V on U - �_
' Exterior Finish G - Lok C- Galt MA5ohIA a 1 M r •
Asor k 114.30h }v 1---- ! 4,11-64 lr a' /� "lum _ �
t 771 Frr�
Landscaping 5(.( l seed( r( Sae 4114 1 A,/ $ l04 eutel $0 2 errs : 2 •I
n0
Sod ( a d ( ( # ?oo) Add 64 add $ WO f blued 4 •W n. +1 b Ivcf r
� y tO
E - - -- _ ._ err r�
Sellers Fee 7 7 9 (71 f)or.. No "G 7 ?
Exclusions I ., f h . .
:_�.___._
' bath ,- ---- - - -- _ -,_,. -•---- - .. _ .. Clown
Other )f 9 - 5 0 / 1
Inc(ctdt5 Ihc(ucas
ax b floor V- d wood R•r• 1 34 bAfh 134 J I'l
i j(.;fs rel 4 a tr1 4 500
i (a51 l> $ 200 PPn1'51' 1 Wtr
double 9(azc r,..,„ ; rn m4, 1
wi „(l 1?aatt1 1
r(r„rr' ro i Z Sau i
a d O 5 170 C I I
” A dd laS !�, 17 D U J
..__-- ...............- ...M..- _... - -- - -_- 9n!> avrY. /a %i, / r. H' I a ` . ' r cl rv . IA 1A i,' ', r.,, ' ', - h.j11 ft!.n c(r v l,.b4Rurulry
31 8;2
6Q Dkp1.2 - n 31 %M8 2 prop ,.., . f( 1 'd g 36,1P05 35 5 p c( -Cr"
oc I A 61 d proIosq 15 L c. 1-,.„
___ _ C61Ye /: L. L, h k j. Mill Ie Goodw;h_ Lke /tic 1 1°PFn
No. square feet /000 14 /7Zg 11 1 to 6 g - 1 &•7,
Wl Ivy( e
No. finished square feet / COO to0 64 _ 10 -
Cost /square foot 31.1 Z
(2 .3.3. a �•�4 35.3
Cost /finished square foot . ,70 3Q43 41.5K 3 35,23
No. square. feet storage ' Nor' 'rP Nor, Nov.<-
Bedroom 1 - square feet ; I n i� c /osc . . 1 � "51 /1,z z5 /,34,S 1 32 I 24. 2,
12 U. 7 - w i 1' di set' • j ,
Bedroom 2 - square feet ihcl_ c /out 14.34"'° 154. s g 12g•] 1 14.•9
Bedroom 3 - square feet
Bedroom 4 - square feet .___. _...__ __..__.____.__. . _.. _._____-_ ......._...•..-.__ -.--
Kitchen
.1-H 1,1 rn gv rAr.G rArv_ 1
Appliances NOhe. hoo ho lvo4 AGO, POW,
'1 ?00
Floor nii ' .t' 1i11o Ie(,,ryv. 11 . PD lfkhrl Vi hy/ 11 ' VkideN,v1
Oil - - -_— oaL w/ Ott w/ oa lc w/ park °• b) Iq�m 11
Cabinets
,',14c formie,t f orrnrc,c Form;e4. wLp146
F. 1A f `fool (4 u.,,,
Bath
r r 1 Ixi ° r 1A 35 al rIber lA
t� �Y 1 RSS f 11� CYt t,A. etr ..m 1 , ' c 1 ceYtim� + )
1 T " cr rvIw it StI7.s Crr,c,
Floor nl)owara ' 4'` 6 I l,oinle u - Fln0r 1 •1.1)., . -e t
eYsirror _ �
Mirror, Vanity Yes Ye `f
. t5 Yes ,,,{- vti�',k°
Floor Finish A11�;1vitnc cur1 �It Carpe -P1D,r A llow Ca # rp car
t kflb ,
ma 111.10)"
Woodwork F ., ,.rsl~d l;soiL j oa kG oil /c- OA /G pi
Lighting Allow -f 00, 00 1 300 ' x
_ -
— ro Heating r e r ( r f ,, (--- ...a`v.re d - .Corr % rl. -` '(j r c •c. cL 6-1;c c .
Electrical Service /00 ornp )U0 aOp 10 111 - ^p_ 100 rf►,lp RV "hit; 1 50 a;
Hotwater Heater jn$ 945 11 t.s 5(1,5 5'- 5a5
3 6 j 1 ..�__. �_ gp 11! ... ,.....3,..e__54 j _.. _. ?0a9 L _._. yl I __ 511
Garage si hi lo ci tt&1{ tit 1 ? clock b /G sih.)tt ... siInj 1,
Driveway blacktop . 1tn , gsphit II bbieli p 65//L ---
Storm windows YG5 clou!), doub dou - i
_ �__ b 1 ^n _. r` <,•c• �,n,�L Irsatp [ ) �(n_�� eat 4
Storm doors NO • YCS ; 5 Ye 9 Ye s
n-_` 614 Perry F 888 gFb' j 8ff8" E8E- 8 88 • 88i
redwood I L t
Exterior Finish � � ' rylRSO»i �._I i mason; / T 46111h X11 rr'n 111,cl
°y 1!
Landscaping No No u No No 'tic N,,
Sod NO N 0 No No i No' 1 Al
Sellers Fee (3) MO / 1 70 1 17 1170 /170 S 1 1 7 0 ! 1 1
1 !
Exclusions 1
___ Other 3-7 32.5 3S• I 3D.q1 35.23
am 1 458
• for •
for 4n ' 80 `
•
..... ..
4 Biz G�- 2--7. I- 1)7.1, 2.2 I- / / -I e� • ) -�
I1 11�"Y 5Ardtc9•G • DL1k t d• 9.6t r Ary G Stith ; 5-1""<' aR� 1,1 ¢ �JaS rr 15 4 4 f ( n 4 � g5 4- 47 52 tic, �.� 4S b(L S " ro a �Jli ((G ft-tic, Hac �eN t tl�cv,� . (.qo_o /0),_._..(g o9D) Lu I- KC.IG1',
No. square feet 18q1, / tj i'7)- tid$ IBS`
No. finished square feet 13'-'1- J 0G) `1 i 0 130 145(, 11 C
' Cost /square foot `, 44 . i . , a1. 50 7.►3
..`�
_ 2.0.9 Z q.3
Cost /finished square foot 33, 6,2 /12,8% 3&. 3 2-y.0 38-4'
No. square feet storage ' 406 . ( 3E ' 431- * 3ti 2(/t7
Bedroom 1 - square feet lj8 - 1 x1 / . ...... /C / .... l?3_a -5 /4Z .'I
_ _
fi B e d r o o m 2 - square feet /03, 5 . 0 ) hcr 4 c!og 1)_ ( cI clf,. r __I (5 • 1 1 III,(,
Bedroom 3, - square feet 1 3 8 /w5,60 135.. 13 5 152 •
/00
.
Bedroom 4 - 'square feet 103, 5 / q 19 3 1 32 )3'2 I 7_0 1
Kitchen
r c hood __
rr
!� VA rri t. hod 1
Appliances NU /Jo N) N o
t
Floor Q I nolC h'YtoLEwsT I�nQ 1 'ho l tu
Cabinets O K ' ��/L OA /Z. w/ oak- w/ aft L' w/ oak. w
ets ff P C
/D1{11' / U 1`IV �i ( n ( .,DV
Bath 1 3/ �• r /A e;., - 1Gicr� W TiborItass
.._ _ e j . ... _._ ,. . . V 1 }► I c k t , - . ,? I•; I .±? . ' . ..y., . ,. ,.__... «�. -
.. .
v,'hy/ a, (I ,,, : , t «
• Floor , �' I "t' 1 i f0 0 I 1no l lt!r+ , (,`nol{ttm lerN ,i ctY 1•LL
Mirror, Vanity U (5 .
Floor Finish ckY pc t 1114DD UYiIr t4rp ._.__ C jx f. carp(
l' A y re t7 st ,' - 1
Woodwork Yri, I^ 0 Jar7 r,',.;stit t ,s on It. otik v a ir. ox k-
9
Lighting Allow $21)0 4),0 $ A00 4200 6)-01)
Heating fvrccd. n.;/ � ivrrr c( P∎ i low d op( Coy r( +( ins cu,u 145 .c,,,,, ,(1 ,),
go or.r1 8.?,oaa fir ►► 6 D) 0 (51:. 60 t DOdotl t 80,0 15/1., 2 s
Electrical Service ISO A 10 0 rr , 61,.
( !DD !A,,,.19 1�0 ���r luo ,,� 1.0
•
Hotwater Heater <
t �� Vi n _ 34 A � 1 I 124 hi
Garage S,'N1 lc 5;11 : dpa };lo Sift b Slab Si,,1I�
Driveway b /a(k 4.. 7, blac4' �h ; c l' cs h& I I tin II'
1 °o,',I ����� - I lu,rt� I wi " , 1.o:, i,!G' • dit,.TIN
Storm windows (! ,, rim r. (7,) ahc (1 ` u! zG I
Storm doors \It s . `f' f Y Y - t / �� �, Ycs
Ba -s-e -m e-n•t ' $ ld P 4 1-v-, ;1_ ._- q _S� __ n _ _. _.1 _. . -__ _ `' `�/_ 9S- - y7 . /- 9 u y
Exterior Finish ' e - Lo/C. I 1 t'.>""I.G Ple)o hr k, N1tt$oM,Is Mu,- ,,„n,.>, AIu -+,:r,
Landscaping 7\- ' IUI No Nv, N 0 No
Sod No No No ,Vd ( • No Aid •
Sellers Fee 31,1 o1' ? r0 ' z
41�6�0 , I "35 I ��� I 360 l ` - >l�� , / ��3p /38o
Exclusions i •
Other 6..53 35.7$ 3t.92. 30 57 t
5.40 elves rt'
n 1X 1'
3' keh
33.5
I
a -
zy',4
'MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director
RE: Policy on Storage of Goods Necessitated by Relocation
DATE: February 5, 1980 and May 2, 1980
The question of interim storage has arisen in the relocation of
certain business tenants in the Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood
Revitalization Project. According to I relocation regulations,
we are permitted to pay for storage of goods removed during
relocation for up to one year.. However, the i.ndi.vidual authority
involved can establish the conditions under which it will be
considered necessary Co store goods, and reimburse the tenant
for expenses so incurred.
I recommend that the HRA reimburse for storage only when a new
site has been established for relocation, but is unavailable at
the time the tenant must relocate. Storage costs will then be
paid from the time of vacation from the project site until the
new site becomes available, not to exceed one year.
JA/ j i.w
•
•
•
•
• MEMO TO: Shakopee HRA •
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive HRA Director
RE: Relocation Claims, Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood
Revitalization Project
DATE: May 2, 1980
We have recieved a number of relocation claims for the E3ourth
and Minnesota Project. You will recall that in general, businesses
can claim the following type of •expenses in relocation claims:
1) Moving possessions to new location:
Move can be undertaken by lowest of at least three
professional bidders, or the displaced businesses can
undertake its own move and be reimbursed an amount
equal to the lowest professional bidder.
2) Searching for new location for business:
Verified time spent in searching can be reimbursed
at the rate of $10.00 per hour to a maximum .of $500.00
for each business.
3) Replacement of stationery and installation of phone
service.
Phone service equivalent to previous service and
. reprinting of stationery made obsolete because of the
• move are reimburseable expenses.
4) Storage of goods.
Under HUD regulations, possessions can be stored
for up to one year under relocation benefits, subject
to additional conditions placed by the granting agency.
5) Payment -in -lieu of actual expenses.
If a business can demonstrate loss of patronage due
to the move, it is eligible for a lump -sum payment.
Claims from the following firms have been reviewed by our consult-
ant, Von Klug and Associates. I concur with their recommendation .
for payment indicated in parenthesis after each business. In all
cases except one, the recommendation for payment is equal to the
. claim. A brief summary of the nature of each claim is included
.for your information.
Shakopee HRA -2- May 2, 1980 cf- •
Rainy Water Conditioner - ($447.00)
Claim is made for moving expenses only. Owner
moved his own possessions, amount of claim is equal
to the lowest moving bid.
Fonder Cleaning Systems - ($312.38)
•
Claim is made for moving expenses only. Owners moved
his own possessions. Amount of claim is equal to the
lowest moving bid.
Rein Truck Line,Inc. - ($10,000)
Claim is for payment -in -lieu of actual moving expense,
and has been preapproved by HUD as an allowable relocation
benefit.
Ries Tool Works - ($168.00)
Claim is made for moving expenses only. Owner moved
his own possessions, amount of claim is equal to the lowest
moving bid.
Jeurissen Brothers Blacktopping - ($1170.00)
Claim is made for moving expenses to and from
storage ($670 each way), searching expenses ($500.00)
and storage expenses ($100.00 per month for 12 months).
Recommended payment includes one move ($670) and
. searching fees ($500.00). The owners moved their own
possessions, the amount recommended for payment is equal
.to the lowest moving bid. The claimants were able to
document $536.86 in searching expenses, so the maximum
payment of $500.00 is recommended.
JA/ j iw
•
•
•
• •
•
MEMO TO: Members o'f the H.R.A.
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director
RE: Approval of Bills
DATE: May 1, 1980
I recommend the following bills for approval:
1] Von Klug and Associates, 4th & Minnesota
Neighborhood Revitalization Project, March
Services $922.50
i] National Association of Housing and Redevelop-
ment Officials, purchase of Directory of
Housing and Community Development Agencies $ 12.00
JA /jsc
•
•
Sov
r RE
CEU
•
APR3 0 1980
t OF! 686 Jackson
Shakopee, Mn.
April 28, 1980
Mr. Douglas Reeder
City Administrator
City of Shakopee
Shakopee, Mn.
Dear Mr. Reeder,
I am writing on behalf of the Calvary United Methodist Congregation
regardix'g the matter of diagonal parking. As you well know we previously
had diagonal parking on Market Street between First Street and the alley—
this area has a recessed curb.
Our congregation would like to request permission for th i;s area
to be returned to diagonal parking for the following reasons:
1. The creation of additional parking spaces ( or recreation)
2. Difficulty in parking parallel due to the.recessed curb
3. Problem of constant abuse of local dwellers in parking in
this area
4. Other churches in Shakopee with recessed parking areas are
allowed diagonal parking
If you have any questions, please feel free "to contact me (445-2013).
I will be looking forward to your.responce. Thank you,
Sincerely,
Priscilla Merryman
• . - .�
•
Arnie's Friendly Folks Club
122 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minn. 55379
April 25, 1980
Mayor Walt Harbeck and
City Council
City of Shakopee
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear Mayor Harbeck and Councilmembers:
On behalf of the Friendly Folks Club, I am hereby requesting
that the City of Shakopee issue me an On Sale Liquor License
effective July 1, 1980.
I appreciate your consideration of this request.
Respectfully,
Arnold Theis
MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder •
City Administrator
FROM: Jeanne Andre
Administrative Assistant
RE: Ad Hoc Energy and Transportation Committee
DATE: May 1, 1980
Attached is an outline for the establishment and charge of
an Ad Hoc Energy and Transportation Committee.
The Council should review and comment.
JA /nae
attachment
•
y
AD HOC ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
I. Establishment and Composition of Committee:
A. This Committee shall consist of 7 -10 members, to be
appointed by the City Council and to include represent-
atives of the following interests in the City.
1. Industry
2. School and Recreation
3. Labor and Construction
4. Agriculture
5. Community Organization(s) •
The Committee shall continue to exist as long as the
Council desires special input on the areas of energy
and transportation. Upon the resignation of a member,
a new member shall be selected, maintaining the above
listed interests in the membership of the Committee.
In addition, the Mayor will be ex- officio member of
the Committee.
B. Members of the Committee shall serve without compensation
and shall not personally benefit from any projects of
the Committee. They shall, at the beginning of each year,
adopt rules for their own proceedings and select a
Chairman and a Secretary from their own number with duties
in addition to Committee membership implied by these titles.
A majority shall consitute a quorum for the transaction of
business.
II. Committee Charge:
The Ad Hoc Energy Commission has the following charge:
1. Explore specific and general energy and transportation
needs in the community.
2. Explore ways to save energy and /or improve efficiency
in providing for the energy and transportation needs
of the community.
3. Monitor programs providing improved transportation
systems and more efficient energy utilization at the
local, regional, state and federal level and evaluate
the potential application of such programs to the
local community needs.
4. Recommend to the City Council programs, procedures or
promotional activities that.can be undertaken by the
City to decrease energy usage or improve transportation
systems in the community.
Y 46-'
..Ad Hoc Energy and Transportation Committee Page 2
5. Promote public awareness of the need for energy -
conservation, and educate the public regarding
potential means of conserving energy.
JA:nae
•
•
•
•
• RESOLUTION NO. 1600
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE
AD HOC CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE
•
•
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee is
the official governing body of the City of Shakopee empowered to
provide for the public health:_. safety, and welfare of its citizens'
and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the need for a citizen
advisory body, to advise the Council on certain matters relating
to franchising a cable communications system;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that
A. Establishment of an Ad Hoc Cable Communications Committee:
1) That a committee, which shall be named the Ad Hoc
Cable Communications Committee, shall be established
to advise the City Council in relation to certain
aspects of franchising a cable communications system
in the City of Shakopee.
2) That the committee be composed of nine members.
•
Members shall serve until the activities herein
defined are completed, unless removed by the City
Council. The Mayor and the Administrative Assistant
to the City Administrator will serve as ex- officio
members of the committee.
3) That the committee shall be composed of members
who are residents of Shakopee and shall include
representatives of the following:
a) library. arid: schools
b) community organizations
c) business and economic interests
•
In addition, special attempts will be made to
involve groups such as.women and minorities not .
generally involved in municipal government in
• proportion to their existance in the population.
4) That the members shall serve without compensation
and may be removed from office at any time by the
City Council.
B. Duties of the committee. The committee is hereby directed
to undertake the following activities and advise the City Council of
their findings.
•
Cam+
•- • ;p Resolution No. 1600 Page -2-
t
1) Research federal and state rules and regula-
.tions relating to Cable Communications.
•
2) Familiarize themselves with current and
•potential services being offered by cable
communications companies.
3) :Determine the advantages and disadvantages
of forming a Cable Service Territory
defined by the Shakopee municipal boundaries
versus a territory formed in conjunction with
.nearby municipalities.
•
4) Assess communications needs in the community.
5) Recommend to the City Council if it should or
should not proceed with the franchising process.
C. Scope of Authority
1) That the committee shall be advisory to and
subject to the direction and control of the
City Council: however., the committee may
establish its own rules and regulations
guiding the conduct and operation of the
committee and its members within its
responsibilities and charge;
•
2) That the committee shall record the minutes of
each meeting which shall be filed in the office
. .of the City Clerk and shall be delivered to •the
Mayor andhCit"y Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall be effective
with its adoption.
Adopted in session of the City Council of.
the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this _ day of
1980.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
•
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
• day of • 1980.
City Attorney
•
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council a
FROM: Tim Keane, City Planner
RE: Ad Hoc Subdivision Review Committee
DATE: May 6, 1980
Below are staff recommendations on the charge, composition, job
description, and timetable for the proposed Ad Hoc Subdivision
Review Committee.
Charge: Review proposed subdivision ordinance. Recommend to the
Planning Commission a draft subdivision ordinance that:
1.) Harmonizes the best interest of the City, the home owner,
the subdivider, and the investor;
2.) Encourages well planned subdivisions by the establishment
of reasonable standards for design and construction;
3.) Insures that public facilities and open spaces are available
in sufficient capacity to serve the population;
4.) Guides the efficient, economic and orderly development of
the City in accord with the Comprehensive -Plan;
5.) Establishes procedures and information requirements that
assure the expeditious review and approval of subdivision
proposals.
This committee should separate those procedures that are most properly
administrative policies and those that are law.
Composition: -The Committee shall consist of seven members to be
recommended by the Mayor and Council with approval by the full
Council. The Committee shall be made up of at least one representa-
tive of the Industrial Development Commission, the local building
contractors, the residential developers, the City Council, the
Planning Commission, the legal profession. The Committee will have
staff support from the City Planner and City Engineer.
Job Description: Each member of the Committee will meet with the
Committee on the first and third Thursday of the month for the
purpose of drafting a subdivision ordinance. Work tasks will
include attendance at the meetings, researching standards, submission
of written recommendations for discussion, and other duties as
required in the preparation of the draft subdivision ordinance.
Timetable: Meeting l (Propose May 15)
Appoint chairman
Adopt timetable
Presentation: Why Subdivision Regulations?
State statutory requirements
Meetings 2 -5 Review, research, recommendations
Meetings 6 -7 Final discussion and draft recommendations.
Forward to Planning Commission August 21.
TK :nae
--�`. City of Shakopee
, r: • p, K O p E E POLICE DEPARTMENT $ Vff
. ..
l ). \ \1 /)'f '� 476 South Gorman Street
t fir\ 3 7
!) ; ."4. 4; p ' r3? l i SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 7::., } _ t�: Tel. 445 -6666 , PO GE „ \ 1 \'t 5 `
��4!T
SUMMARY OF 1979 ANNUAL REPORT ,
For statistical reporting purposes, we are required to in-
' clude Valleyfair offenses in the Uniform Crime Reporting.
System. In order to clearly define specific areas of con-
cern within the City upon which we may have an impact,
Valleyfair data is being documented in a separate report.
A decrease is noted in the number of persons processed by
the department at the Valleyfair facility. The decrease
is believed to be the result of a change in the security
management which resulted in Valleyfair.handling many of
the minor problems. •
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
It should be noted that generally an increase in reported
• offenses resulted in an increase - in the number of persons
arrested for the specific offense.'
One significant area of concern is the number of juveniles
arrested for liquor /marijuana violations. 43% of the 241
juvenile arrests were for liquor /marijuana offenses (31%
liquor and 12% marijuana). These violations generally re-
sult in an increase in the number of vandalism, disorderly
conduct, assault, and driving under the influence violations
which we experienced during 1979.
There may be other specific areas of concern which I will
be available to discuss with any person who wishes to con-
tact me at their convenience.
-• • ---- ‘7-0-, s
go cse•vc zoEaef .
t` .
�; City of Shakopee .-
,i,:14,.. , /' - ' P OLICE DEPARTMENT . , `
N PE L � a ti.
(I a` 1���L 1,o, 476 South Gorman Street ",111.,/'‘';' ?;
1, = ' .. 1 SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 �, " '` AO
,�
;,
'' ‘ ,� Tel. 445 -6666 -,4/17-
P 0 � -� G E C , V -
y ; . :- 40
5 5 3 7 9 1979 ANNUAL REPORT: <:
On January 1, 1979, the Shakopee Police Department con-
sisted of a Chief of Police, 1 Detective, 1 Juvenile Police -
School Liaison Officer, 2 Patrol Sergeants, 8 Patrolmen,` and
3 Secretaries.
In January, 1979, Officer Ron Carlson conducted a two
week class for the students at the Shakopee Senior High on
issues in law enforcement. .
Officer Ron Carlson attended the ATOM Instructor's Course
from January 22nd through January 26th, 1979.
On February 2, 1979, Officer.:. John ,Flynn completed eight
weeks of BCA School.
The 6th Annual National Juvenile Justice Conference was
attended by Officer Earl Fleck in San Diego, California from
February 4th through February 9th,,1979.
Officers Russ Lawrence, Ron Scherer, and John Flynn
attended the Advanced Driver's Training Course held in St.
Cloud, Minnesota from February .12th:.through February 14th,
1979.
On February 15, 1979, John DuBois resigned his position
as Chief of Police and was reassigned to the position of
Detective Sergeant effective June 4, 1979.
On June 4, 1979, Thomas G. Brownell was hired as Chief
of Police for the Shakopee Police Department.
Officer Terry Doyle attended the Firearms Instructor's
Course July 9th through July 20th, 1979.
The 14th Annual Criminal Justice Conference was attended
by Chief Tom Brownell, Detective Sergeant John DuBois, Detective
Don Bisek, and Officer Ron Carlson in Bloomington, Minnesota on
August 27th, 28th, and 29th, 1979.
Officer Earl Fleck attended the Minnesota Juvenile Justice
Conference on September 7th and 8th, 1979.
•
go eSE2VG_ go Jn cotiat ._
•
• 1979 ANNUAL REPORT
Page -2-
Sgt. Ken Hanel and Officer Earl Fleck attended a Bomb
Recognition Seminar on September 19th, 1979.
Firearms Instructor Terry Doyle certified approximately
30 12 and 13 year olds on the care and handling of firearms
before the 1979 hunting season began in September.
Officer Carlson and Officer Fleck represented the Shakopee
Police Department at the public school board hearing regarding
the controversial chemical abuse program which was proposed in
October, 1979. The program was later approved and will be
inaugurated in 1980.
In October, 1979, the Shakopee Golden (loves Boxing Program
sponsored by the Shakopee Police Department began it's program
for boys between 11 and 18 years of age.
Sgt. Ken Hanel and Sgt. Dick Kaley attended a two day
Advanced Driver's Training Course held in St. Cloud, Minnesota
on November, and 14th, 1979,
All Shakopee Police Officers attended the first training
session given by the Scott County Attorney on November 20th,
1979. This session dealt with offense elements and issues
and specific new laws on stops and searches.
On December 19, 1979, Detective Sergeant John DuBois was
appointed as Deputy Chief of Police.
On December 31, 1979, the Shakopee Police Department con-
sisted of a Chief of Police, a Deputy Chief of Police, 1
Detective, 1 Juvenile Officer, 2 Patrol Sergeants, 8 Patrolmen,
and 3 Secretaries.
The year 1979 showed a 13% increase in complaints received
by the Shakopee Police Department. In 1978, 6,647 complaints
were received and 7,544 complaints were received in 1979. These
figures include the complaints received by Valleyfair.
In 1978, there were a total of 1,311 Part I and Part II
crimes investigated by the Shakopee Police Department. Of these
offenses, 120 were classified as unfounded or exceptionally
cleared, 426 were cleared by arrest, and 765 crimes were pending.
Shakopee Police investigated 1,607 crimes in'1979, a 22% increase.
Of these crimes, 161 were unfounded or exceptionally cleared, 521
were cleared by arrest, and 925 are pending. The figures for
Part I and Part II crimes does not include Valleyfair incidents.
l
1979 ANNUAL REPORT
Page -3-
• The following is a break -down of Part I and Part II crimes:
PART I CRIMES: 1977 1978 1979
Homicide -- -- 4 ''.+ 400%
Rape 1 3 1 - 66%
Armed Robbery - 4 2 1 - 50%
Aggrevated Assault 8 5 7 + 40%
Simple Assault 37 38 60 + 57%
Burglary 69 72 70 - 2%
Larceny 408 447 476 + 6%
Auto Theft 47 66 66
. Arson 11 8 4 - 50%
585. 641 689 + 7%
Part 1 crimes :. increased.: by 7% in 1979. The State -wide increase was
8.1% in 1979.
PART II CRIMES: 1977 1978 1979
Extortion _ 1 5 + 400%
Forgery 11 13 22 + 69%
Fraud 5 9. 9
Possess /Receive /Conceal Stolen
Property '5 11 3 - 72%
Vandalism 259 262 398 + 51%
Narcotic Violations 53 33 29 - 12%
Indecent Exposure 8 5 7 + 40%
Prostitution -- 1 -- - 100%
Other Sex Offenses 5 1 6 + 500% -.
Cruelty /Neglect Toward Child -- 10 22 + 120%
Gambling -- 1 -- - .100%
Sale of Liquor to Minor 4 2 5 + 150%
Illegal Possession of Liquor 27 47 39 - 37%
Misrepresenting Age 9 7 2 71%
Consumption by a Minor 32 13 44 + 238%
Obscene Material or Communication -- 6 9 + 50%
False Reporting to Officer 1 -- 2 + 200%
Resisting /Obstructing Arrest 8 12 17 + 41%
•
. . .
- . 7 s '''
. -
1979 ANNUAL REPORT
Page -4-
PART II CRIMES (Continued) 1977 1978 1979
Escape From Custody/Aiding 13 9 10 + 11%
Illegal Possession /Use of
Explosives -- -- 9 + 900%
Illegal Possession of Weapon -- 1 1
Discharge Weapon in City Limits 2 4 4
Bomb Threats 3 3 2 - 33%
Other Weapon Offenses 3 1 5 + 400%
Harassing Communication 16 29 22 - 24%
Disorderly Conduct 50 38 61 + 60%
Curfew 29 8 6 - 25%
Runaway 7 17 15 - 11%
Unauthorized Use of Vehicle 5 -- --
Terroristic Threats -- -- 12 +1200%
D.W.I. 78 86 104 + 20%
Trespassing/Gate Crashing 4 12 11 - 8%
Vagrancy /Loitering -- -- 2 + 200%
Truancy /Incorrigibility 2 -- 5 + 500%
Kidnapping /Abduction 2 1 1
Probation Violations -- ' 1 -- - 100%
Miscellaneous 20 26 29 + 11%
662 670 918
Part II crimes increased by 37% in 1979.
During 1979, a total of 622 persons were arrested compared to
478 persons in 1978. These figures do not include Valleyfair
arrests. Total adults arrested in 1979 were 381, while juvenile
arrests were 241. Total adults arrested in 1978 were 238 and the
total juveniles arrested in 1978 were 240. Therefore, there was
a 30% increase in arrests with 60% increase in adult arrests and
no change in juvenile arrests.
. , . .
•
7.--
1979 ANNUAL REPORT
Page -5-
The following is a break -down of arrests:
ARRESTS:' 1977 1978 1979
Homicide -- -- 1 + 100%
Robbery 1 -- --
Aggrevated Assault 4 3 6 + 100%
Burglary 18 15 6 - 60%
Larceny 47 77 70 - 9%
Auto Theft 25 24 16 - 33%
Simple Assault 14 17 28 + 64%
Arson 2 1 -- - 100% •
Forgery 1 7 10 + 42%
• Fraud 1 -- --
Possession of Stolen Property 3 5 8 + 60%
Vandalism 54 42 78 + 85%
Weapon Offenses 7 9 20 + 122%
Other Sex Offenses 2 1 5 + 400%
Narcotic Violations 66 24 31 + 29%
Gambling -- . 1 -- - 100%
D.W.I. 70 86 104 + 20%
Liquor Violations 138 78 115 + 47%
Disorderly Conduct 78 38 70 + 84%
Other Public Order Crimes 55 22 33 + 50%
Curfew 49 14 6 - 57%
Runaway 7 14 15 + 7%
642 478 622 + 30%
TOTAL ARRESTS: 1977 1978 1979
ADULTS 269 238 381 + 60%
JUVENILES 373 240 241
642 478 622 + 30%
D nn
•
•
1979 ANNUAL REPORT
Page -6-
TRAFFIC CITATIONS: 1977 1978 1979
ANDERSON 124 194 74
BISEK 1 1 --
CARLSON 121 186 144
DOYLE 46 66 72
FLYNN -- 1 180
HANEL 88 80 100
KALEY 450 389 341
LAWRENCE 99 147 376
NOSBUSCH 84 109 138
POOLE 58 117 106
SCHERER 54 57 47
1125 1347 1578 + 17%
STOLEN /RECOVERED PROPERTY VALUE: 1977 1978 1979
Value of Stolen Property $166,466 $193,455 $444,744 + 129%
Value of Recovered Property 51,150 98,000 152,752 + 55%
COURT FINES PAID: 1977 1978 1979
Total Fines Collected $ 42,509 $ 53,581 $ 48,780 - 8%
City Share 21,664 27,741 25,010 - 26%
•
ACCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS: 1977 1978 1979
Property Damage Accidents 279 315 405 + 28%
Personal Injury Accidents 56 85 92 + 8%
Fatal Accidents -- 1 1
Pedestrian Accidents 4 3 2 - 33%
339 404 500 + 23%
•
//
/ /d
T omas G. Browne
CHIEF OF POLICE
. . i s. .
r; (/" ; City of Shakopee ■ 1, K POLICE DEPARTMENT H ~' .42 `
A � •:
h \� `\L li '4 476 South Gorman Street '.
A ' - _ jD SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 v
7.'
k (
; '�+ P j
P Tel 445 -6666 5 011 . 1 T 14 ? ,
� its
+ • O L 1 G / I
r
f"
'55379 .'
'1"`P'
1979 VALLEYFAIR STATISTICS
In 1979, the Shakopee Police Department investigated 144
reported incidents occurring at Valleyfair, compared to 269
incidents in 1978. This is a 46% decrease.
The following is a break -down of Valleyfair incidents:
VALLEYFAIR ACTIVITY: 1976 1977 1978 1979
Assaults 2 3 2 1 - 50%
Sex Offenses -- 1 -- --
Auto Thefts 1 -- 2 -- - 200%
Shoplifting /Larceny 1 10 23 19 - 17%
Vandalism -- 1 6 '1 83%
Fraud /Forgery — -- -- 2 + 200%
Narcotic Violations 52 31 89 23 - 25%
Liquor Violations 6 6 37 12 - 67%
Bomb Threats -- -- 1 1
Disorderly Conduct 3 2 9 2 - 77%
Trespassing /Gate Crashing 3 3 -- 10 + 1000%
Lost and Found Property -- 1 6 6
Motor Vehicle Accidents -- 15 21 14 - 33%
Medicals -- 4 10 9 - 10%
Fire Calls -- 1 -- 2 + 200%
Miscellaneous (alarms, motorist
assists, etc.) -- 46 47 42 10%
69 124 269 144 - 46%
In 1979, 110 persons were arrested at Valleyfair, compared
to 337 in 1978. This is a 67% decrease in arrests.
` !Jo S'ezve 9 J ' oteaL.
r ,r
r ,
.w •
1979 VALLEYFAIR STATISTICS
Page -2-
The following is a break -down of Valleyfair arrests:
OFFENSES: 1976 1977 1978 1979
Assaults 2 3 4 -- 400%
Larceny /Shoplifting 1 ' 9 18 8 - 55%
Disorderly Conduct 3 8 14 2 - 85%
Trespassing /Gate Crashing 8 1 9 14 + 55%
Liquor Violations 22 17 .128 40 - 68%
Narcotic Violations 93 54 158 40 - 74%
Weapon Offenses -- -- 1 -- - 100%
Procuring /Contributing 1 -- 3 -- - 300%
Fraud /Forgery 1 -- -- 1 + 100%
Auto Theft 2 -- -- --
Possession of Stolen Property -- 1 -- --
Obstructing Legal Process -- -- 2 -- - 2000
Truancy -- -- -- 5 + 500%
133 93 337 110 - 67%
TOTAL ARRESTS: 1976 1977 1978 1979
ADULTS 48 24 119 36 - 69%
JUVENILES 85 69 218 74 - 66%
133 93 337 110 - 67%
. Thomas G. Brownell -.
CHIEF OF POLICE
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
RE: Industrial Commercial Commission
DATE: April 30, 1980
The terms of two members of the Industrial and Commercial
Commission expired January 31, 1980. Both wish to be
reappointed. According to your procedure, you should
accept nominations at this meeting and appoint at the next
meeting.
The two persons whose term expired and who are seeking
reappointment are: Jim Raduenz and Roger Peterson.
DSR /jiw - •
•
•
IN
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
RE: Ice Arena Commission
DATE: April 30 1980
Following the last Council discussion on the Ice Arena,
I have determined that there are two rather clear -cut courses
of action which the City Council could take in setting up and
operating an Ice Arena. There could be variations of these,
but I believe that going one way or the other is the best
approach.
A. Formal Ice Arena Commission
This alternative is essentially what has been presented
to you im ordinance form. It sets up a commission of the City
of Shakopee which operates on behalf of the City Council and is
responsible to the City Council for the operation of the Ice
Arena. Under this proposal the employees of the Ice Arena would
be City employees. The Finance Department would handle their
money and the City would not escape liability in any way. This
is the type of committee that would have to be established if
and when the City accepted the Ice Arena building and operations.
Advantages:
1. It puts the City Council in charge of
the Ice Arena operation, not in a day to day
capacity, but in an appointment and budget
approval capacity similar to the Community Services
Board.
2. It provides the Ice Arena with the
expertise of existing City staff in several depart-
ments.
3. It may ultimately allow the sharing
of employees between the arena and other City
functions.
Disadvantages:
1. This situation does not fit the operation
of a facility not owned by the City.
2. This situation puts the City in a position
of liability if anyone has a claim against the Ice
Arena or if the Ice Arena falls short in operating,
maintenance or construction funding.
Mayor and City Council April 30, 1980
Ice Arena Commission Page -2- q 1 v
•
B. Private Ice Arena Committee
This alternative would be similar to the structure of
the Ice Arena Committee to date. The Committee would not be
appointed by the City Council and would set up its own structure.
It would simply be a private entity leasing City land for a
privately operated public purpose. There would need to be some
protedtion for the City in the actual lease agreement; such as
insurance requirements and maybe even a requirement that a
committee structure be approved by the City Council and approval
of the plans and specifications of the proposed building.
Advantages:
1. The City would not be dictating the
operation of a private ice arena operation.
2. The City would not commit any staff time
to the operation except by direction of the City
Council or a contractual agreement.
3. The private operators would not be
bound to the purchasing requirement of the City.
4. The employees of the arena, if any,
would not be City employees and the terms of
employment could be separately worked out.
Disadvantages:
1. The City Council could not require
changes in the operation or maintenance of the
facility which it may deem appropriate.
2. Because of the probable attempt to use
more volunteer employees, the operation and
maintenance of the facility may not be of the
same quality and may fluctuate as volunteers
-
come and go.
3. The cost of operating the facility may
exceed revenues and there would be less of an
obligation for the City to provide the needed
operating funds.
Recommendations:
A. It is my recommendation that the City Council at this
time not set up a formal committee but rather allow the Ice Arena
Committee to lease City property with the following conditions:
Mayor and City Council April 30, 1980 c),v
Ice Arena Commission Page -3- I
1. That the property be used only for the construction
of an Ice Arena for which the City Council has final plan
approval before construction begins.
2. That an Ice Arena Committee be formed and
that the structure and bylaws of the committee be
submitted to the City Council for approval.
3. That the Ice Arena be required to carry the
appropriate insurance to protect the City of Shakopee.
4. That the property be kept in an orderly manner.
S. Other conditions recommended by the City Attorney
which are normally included in a lease agreement.
B. It is my recommendation that the City Council discuss
now the arrangement between the City and the Ice Arena Committee
concerning future turn -over of the facility and operational
financing before the turn -over.
1. Is the City agreeing unconditionally to accept
the Ice Arena when it is fully paid for? Will it have
to be maintained to a certain extent before we accept the
Arena?
2. Will the City provide money to help operate
the facility before the turn -over? If so, under what
conditions?
3. What is the City's feeling on the purchase
of second -hand equipment that may need immediate
/replacement when the Arena is turned over to the City
(i.e. the Zamboni).
4. When the Ice Arena is turned out to the
City then the formal Ice Arena Committee should be
formed.
DSR /jiw
Attachments
•
it
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
RE: Ice Arena Commission
DATE: April 10, 1980
Attached is a revised copy of the criteria for the Ice
Arena Commission as made at the City Council meeting of
April 1, 1980.
jiw
Attachment
•
•
•
•
1
Sed. 2.55 ICE ARENA COMMISSION
Subd. 1. The Establishment and Composition of Commission
A. An Ice Arena Commission, composed of three members,
is hereby established. The members shall be appointed by the
City Council and will serve staggered three -year terms. No •
more than one member shall be a member of the Council. However,
the Council.may additionally, or in lieu of having a Council
member on the Commission, appoint one of its members an ex-
officio member of the Commission. The Council will appoint the
first members to take effect May 6, 1980, indicating one member
whose term will expire the first meeting in 1981, a second whose
term will expire the first meeting in 1982, and a third member
whose term will expire the first meeting in 1983. Both original
and successive appointees shall serve until their successors
are appointed and qualified. Commission members must reside
within the corporate limits of the City at the time of their
•
appointment to the Commission and if they move outside of the
corporate limits during their term of office, they shall tender
their resignation to the Council, who may accept or reject it.
If the Council rejects the resignation, said Commissioner may
complete his term of office.
B. Members of the Board shall serve without compensation
and shall not be personally interested in any contracts of the
Commission. They shall at the beginning of each fiscal year, select
a Chairman and a Secretary from their own number with duties in
addition to Commission membership implied by these titles. A
majority shall constitute a quorem for the transaction of business.
%
}
' • -2- C; /e/
Subd. 2. General Powers
The Ice Arena Commission shall have the power to
oversee the construction and operation of the ice arena built
in Lion's Park. It shall have the power to make cooperative
agreements with the Joint Recreation Board for the purpose of
coordinating activities in the Ice Arena and Lion's Park.
Subd. 3. Specific Powers
In order to oversee the operation of. the Ice Arena, the
Commission shall have powers to:
A. Adopt rules for its own proceedings, providing
at least one regular meeting every month,. and the trans-
action of its business and rules governing the use of the Ice
Arena and related facilities under its control;
B. •Contract with a professional ice arena management
companies to provide input to the design and construction of the
ice arena, 'arid . for the operation of various facets of the ice
arena and to fix rates for the use of the facility.
C. Accept contributions for the operation and improvement
•
of the ice arena facility.
D. Maintain and care for the facilities it oversees,
including the carrying of any insurance coverage it deems necessary.
• E. Perform whatever other acts are reasonable and necessary
and proper to operate an ice arena under this section.
i
-3- ? .�
Su8d. 4. Finances of the Commission
A. The Commission shall at least six months prior to
each fiscal year, present to the City Council a proposed operating
budget for review and approval. The Commission shall make a
bi- monthly review of revenues and expenses and report to the
Council any differences material in amount from those presented
in the budget.
B. Finances of the Commission. For the purpose of
financing the Ice Arena, there shall be established in the City.
accounts a special fund to be called the Ice Arena'
Fund. Into this Fund shall be placed the various Ice Arena
revenues. All receipts belonging to the Commission shall be
deposited .. to the credit of the Fund
and no disbursement shall be made except
by check nor unless a verified claim [or services and commodities
actually rendered or delivered has first been submitted to and
approved for payment by the Commission, as authenticated by
signature of the Chairman. The accounting of the Fund and the
custody of the monies shall be in the
hands of the accounting officer and the Treasurer, respectively,
of the City. These officers shall make reports to the Commission
at reasonable intervals as determined by the Commission. For
purposes of budgeting, accounting, and reporting, the fiscal
year of the Commission and the Fund shall be the same as that of the City-.
An audit of the funds shall be made annu&lly. Such audit may be
1
-4-
made independently of or in conjunction with any audit which may
be made of the funds of the City. The Commission shall be
authorized to establish charges or fees for the restricted use
of any facilities or to make any phase of the ice arena wholly
or partially self- sustaining. Any concessions or privileges
a
may be sold after public advertising and competitive bidding.
Any employees who handle cash in the process of collection shall
be bonded.
C. Financial Report. The Board shall as soon as possible
after the end of each fiscal year, prepare and present to the
City Council a comprehensive annual report of its activities
and finances.
1
draft: 4/10/80 •
. r i
,, t , y V+ }. Y q •r• R tF, fy r y �; •1 a 'A `ry." i 1 Y n ;. I ,, } >. 7 n 7 •,
.1 eill A� °K J ' .y! f j' .' 1 �' 4 '11Z' Yr t�1 r. ?'��"1 T.. } § • gt t rG }.�� r rf i ; . ..�. r/ f�� A 7 , . '. 7 G:: r Y3,,
j ,`' t.r t a y t � 7Y �af,1 Lr +7 p1f n , ,, e > (+,fr G''[F d , f '' k '� :.:r ..1 r J A t i ;r a v .`. r L I ( & r l i i j lit r jl` �Z# i f p W r :•r S r t o t t , h , A a » % 1 r i.. r 1_ 1 i t~ i .'k7 U •( ;A . 6 7t; !� ' • � y. 4, V, q 7 4 } . •i ,( a t �, �' J V r �r!11t'h •t 9��` � �,.r. 2 �f� r, + ,;� t r 1 � ,U' � f 7� � '7}�r r 1 , , !'• f p .� � ^ r, - � ..� 7 mr r •• i •. I, !. ` + r }' i %.. .� u '1 1 i, , 1 , �7 1 ,� . 7 d t . 6Qt�7j A '" y y�. •�' �.,��• � �,�..Sn,7�'ik. r• �h .(. Yy , ��. � . r ���� o f :�' / �'2•. ,' f . � � .� � 7 �.
1 ( � R � •s 44.1 h 7 ''l 07; t 9 t'' t « . rck ,' r, µ i ..' f 7
�� { .a 9�e 7 1 �F tfn' +�4 r X s�'�� y, 9 } {Z! jl •�. br r .e }�' M ..� e� , •; 2 Y ' L.� 3 r
S t�+ a .I '-,t ; , ", 1 , . 3 .. v. ? s , j:� i _ r ' 7 1 _ ,P-
• A { ' �•a � '� Y , , � �xM , . t,. �i ., k ,7• e G f t t i I ' ` t5 { -
• l , • " RESOLUTION NO. 1570
;: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE LEASING OF
CITY PROPERTY FOR AN ICE ARENA
— -- .
RI •: -- .--- • - -• -- WHEREAS, Shak -O- Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc. , has undertaken
the construction of an Ice Arena in the City of Shakopee; and
O.
WI {EP.EAS, the Shakee City Concil. finds that the City of
Shakopee will benefit from op the constr of an Ice Arena in the
M;:'
':fiab•, City of Shakopee; and
r x
1i WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Council finds that the best
location for the proposed Ice Arena is on City property located
i '_. V adjacent to the community swimming pool; and
'ice; ' WHEREAS, the construction of an Ice Arena at that location
�� G:I,j cctit.
!. , r would be , in accordance with the Long -range plans for that park area
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
.. . ..... 'l(.
ITY OF SHAKOPEE, that the City Council does hereby authorize the
11
ro
City Administrator and the Mayor to execute a lease agreement with
t ' Shak -0-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc., for the lease of City property
-' for the construction of an Ice Arena with the following conditions
i• \.._i,,• ,
4,
.
. which shall be included in the lease agreement:
`... t! }:
':. .•• 1) The property leased to Shak -0-Valley Amateur. Hockey,
31?' :; l'= c''i :-Inc., . shall • b•e .used by the Shak -0 -Valle Amateur Hockey,
�, Y Y Y
:` ' Inc., only for the construction of an Ice. Arena.
^y 2) That`the'City Council reserves final approval of
f °'
the plans `and : speci_fications for any facility constructed
1 t, on this site including the phasing of construction.
3) The Shak 70- Valley Amateur hockey, Inc., presents
=1 and the City Council approves a report which sets forth
;p the financial feasibility of the project prior to the
4` start: of::'construction.
' 4) That a committee be established by the City Council
with members appointed by the City Council to operate
":1; the Ice Arena before construction is begun.
:+
Adopted in Adj. Reg. Session of the Shakopee City Council
, rte
of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 19th day of February
y. .
1980.
/i"z t y
__ Mayor of "the City of Shakopee
ATTEST: "�
t
. az -�zr� So> - _
* }Cit.y>. Clerrk /•
` App -Ved as to form this l/ day of
"� C _i a r :. . ' , 1980
Assist - It City Attorney
1
7h ;
•
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council �\
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
RE: Temporary Employees
DATE: May 1, 1980
Each year the budget contains authorization to hire temporary
employees in the various departments. We hire from time to
time people in the Public Works Department, people to run.
the swimming pool, inspectors in Engineering, cleaning ladies
and some temporary employees in the office.
We have generally been inconsistent in our approach to the
City Council on these employees. Some we have requested
approval, some we have not. Generally, we have requested
approval only when the position is new and always when it
is not budgeted.
I think the Council should adopt a policy on this so that we
have an understanding of what is expected. I would suggest
the following alternatives.
1) Take all new employees to the City Council
•
for approval before hiring no matter how long
they will be employed.
2) Do not take any temporary employees to
the City Council unless they will be employed
full -time for more than four months, unless
the position is not budgeted for.
3) Notify the Council after the fact if
temporary employees are hired.
4) Notify the Council of the approximate
number of temporary employees to be hired in
the summer in each department.
Recommendation:
The staff is confortable with any of the alternatives, although
because the Council does not always meet each week, it is
difficult at times to keep temporary employees waiting for
Council approval, especially if they are very short -term or
hard to find people. In addition, this may be an area that
can be handled administratively as long as the funds are
provided in the budget.
DSR /jiw
9/71,
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
RE: Siebenaler Easement - 4th and Minnesota
DATE: May 1, 1980
I have negotiated a settlement with Ed Siebenaler with the
following conditions:
1.) He will grant easement needed for water
and sewer only (no gas or electric).
2.) City will agree that his assessment will
not exceed $5750.
3.) City will blast trench for water and sewer
but install water only.
The actual estimated assessment for water is $6,348 60. The
cost of blasting the trench for both sewer and water is
expected to be at a very small, if any, additional cost.
Recommendation:
Authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to enter into an
agreement with Ed Siebenaler for this acquisition of a water -
main easement as outlined by City staff.
DSR: jiw
7 Z
MEMO TO: Shakopee HRA
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director
RE: Recommended Contractor Proposals and Review Information -
Fourth and Minnesota Project
DATE: May 6, 1980
I have reviewed the proposals submitted and feel the following
plans offer the best combination of space and economy, and make
best use of the sites available. I, therefore, offer these
selections to open discussion.
1. Clete Link - Block 2, Lots 5 and 6 - Two bedroom duplex
with tuck -under double garage. This proposal includes possible
addition of third bedroom.
2. Larry Link - Block 2, Lots 9 and 10 (he requested Lots
7 and 8) - two bedroom duplex with tuck -under double garage.
This proposal includes possible addition of a third bedroom.
3 Gary.Goodwin Block 2, Lots 3 and 4, 7 and 8, and Block 3,
Lots 1 and 2 - Two bedroom duplexes with tuck -under double
garage. This proposal includes possible addition bf a third
bedroom.
4. Simon Haefner - Block 2, Lot 2 - Four bedroom split -entry
home with 1 3/4 baths and 1 1/2 car garage. The top level of
this unit would be pre - built; the lower level, garage and
entry way would be on -site.
5. Luckie Construction - Block 1, Lot.1 - Four bedroom
split -entry home with 1 3/4 baths and 2 car garage slab.
I am also providing here additional information about garage costs,
estimated costs at closing and information on bedroom -mix to aid in
our review process.
Comparison of 4 bedroom proposals with and without garages:
With Garage No Garage
. Haefner 1 l/2 car Lot 2 -2 $44,449.00 $40,111
Laurent 1 car Lots 1 -1 & 2 -2 45,834.00 44,734.00
Miller . 2 car Lot 2 -2 47,522.00
Miller 1 car Lot 1 -1 45,522.00
Luckie 2 car Lot 1 -1 46,604.00 43,504.00
Luckie 1 car Lot 2 -2 45,684.00 43,184.00
.JA/ j iw
Attachment
7M/
EXAMPLES OF SALES PRICES WITH RELATED MORTGAGE AMOUNTS
AND AMOUNTS TO BE PAID AT CLOSING
2 - 3 Bedroom
Sale Price Mortgage Amount Paid at Closing
$38,000.00 $37,322.50 $
39,000.00 38,000.00 2,650.00
41,000.00 38,000.00 3,900.00
4 Bedroom
Sale Price Mortgage Amount Paid at Closing
$44,000.00 $43,060.00 $2,640.00
45,000.00 44,000.00 2,700.00
47,500.00 44,000.00 4,400.00
Paid at Closing = down payment + closing costs
Mortgage Limit ._ $38,000 for 2 or. 3 bedroom; $44,000 for 4 bedroom
5/5/80
ESTIMATE OF BEDROOM -MIX NEEDS
(Based on Current Applicants)
Using the information listed below, I estimate that current
demand for units based on number of bedrooms necessary for current
applicants is as follows:
4 Bedroom - 4
3 Bedroom - 5
2 or 3 Bedroom - 3
2 Bedroom - 6
units (12 currently proposed)
INCOME ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS
Adults Children Bedroom
F M8, F6, F3 3
MF F2 2
MF F2, FO 2 or 3
MF ?0 2
MF FO 2
F M7, F2 3
F M3 2
F F19, ?17, M14 3
MF M9, F5, Fl 4
F F4 2
MF F7, F5, F2 4
MF F3, Fl, ? 4
MF F2, ? 2 or 3
MF F9, M7 3
MF 2
M F2, Ml, MO 4
F • F12, M7 3
F F7, F3 2 or 3
NOT INCOME - ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS
Adults Children Bedroom
MF F22, F17, F1l 4
MF F5, F4 2 or 3
MF F4
5/5/80
4 ;2!
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
RE: Summer Hours at City Hall
DATE: April 30, 1980
For many years City Hall has changed hours in the summer to
work from 7:30 AM to 4:00 PM instead of 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM.
In the last several years, we have had someone in City Hall
to answer the phone until 4:30 each day
This year I surveyed the employees in City Hall and did not
find a clear majority in favor or against the summer hours
and, therefore, I am proposing that we allow each department
head to work out the hours for the employees in their depart- -
ments'and that City Hall remain open until 4:30 PM
Recommendation:
That City Hall remain on the same schedule but that employees
be permitted to work from 7:30 AM to 4:00 PM if they receive
approval from their department head.
DSR /jiw
•
//CO
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Appointment of Acting Administrator
DATE: May 1, 1980
The Administrator will be out of town May 7th through May 9th
attending the 1980 Spring Conference of the Minnesota City Management
and Association, at Craguns Resort in Brainerd.
It is recommended that Tom Brownell be appointed Acting
Administrator during the absence of the Administrator from May 7th
through May 9th.
DSR /jsc
•
MEMO TO: 'Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tim Keane, City Planner
RE: Actions by the Planning Commission
DATE: May 1, 1980 .
At the April 24th, 1980 Planning Commission Meeting the Planning
Commission acted on the following requests:
a] PC 80 -13C Request for a conditional use permit to house
horses on a 10.90 acre tract, which lies Easterly of
CR -89 in NE4 of Sec. 13- 115 -22, requested by Jerald Wilking
Planning Commission approved request with two conditions:
1] all stable manure be hauled off -site and
2] non - gelded horses over two years of age be kept in
stallion accommodations.
b] PC 80 -14C Request for a conditional use permit to install
a 10,000 gal. storage tank to be located on what used to be
the Kaufman & Broad site, requested by Warner True Value Hdwe
• Planning Commission approved request with conditions:
1] Construction of the clay dike be according to the
specifications and approval of the City Engineer
2] Submission of a plan to minimize the visual impact of the
tank
3] Approval of the Shakopee Fire Department
c] PC 80 -12R Request for the rezoning of 58+ acres lying East
of Valleyfair and North of Highway 101 from AG agricultural
to B -1 highway business
Planning Commission recommended the redesignation from floodway
to floodplain, and recommended the rezoning from agricultural
and floodplain to highway business.
TK /jsc
toE Gam'
C z
RESOLUTION #211
7
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING WINTER DISCONNECT
RULE FOR RESIDENTIAL ELECTRIC SERVICE
WHEREAS, The following rule shall apply during "cold weather months,"
j •
October-f5 through April 15 to any residential customer who makes
application to the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission and who demon-
strates to that body's satisfaction that the conditions herein are met.
A. The utility shall not disconnect the service of any residential
customer during "cold weather months" not - with- standing any
other customer service rule of the utility if the disconnection
would affect in any way the primary heat source of the
residential unit, and:
1. Disconnection of utility service would result in an undue
hardship and endanger the health and welfare of those
persons residing within the residence where utility service
is being provided.
2. The customer is unable to pay the balance due for utility
service rendered in accordance with normal utility billing
procedures.
3. Where the residential customer has not declared his or her
inability to pay or where the Utility Commission has determined
that the residential customer is able to pay, and in either
case, the residential customer has entered into a payment
schedule and is reasonably on time with payments under the
schedule.
B. The utility shall mail to all existing residential customers and
shall furnish to all new customers upon application for service
a "Notice of Residential Customer Rights and Possible Assistance."
This notice shall include an explanation of. the winter disconnect
rule, a list of organizations (with addresses and phone numbers)
which provide financial aid to the residential customer. At
minimum, this list shall include the local welfare agency and the
local community action program or agency which disperses emergency
fuel assistance and a form upon which to apply under the rule.
C. Upon receipt of a declaration of inability to pay by a residential
customer, the utility shall act within thirty (30) days to either
•
certify that the customer is eligible under the winter disconnect
rule or is not eligible. During this time, the utility shall not
disconnect service to the customer. The Utility Commission shall
make every reasonable effort to establish a mutually agreeable time
for a hearing on the declaration. Failure of the applicant to
appear shall be grounds for application of the utility's normal
disconnect policy unless the applicant demonstrates an unavoidable
conflict or emergency.
1. Demonstration by the applicant of the following circumstances
. shall be considered sufficient by themselves in demonstration
of inability to pay.
•
(a.) An affidavit from the patient's physician that termination
of utility service would impose a danger to the customer
or resident of the customers households' health.
(b.) Documentation that the customer is receiving or will be
eligible during the coming winter period for social security
or medicade.
(c.) Documentation that the customer is a recipient or has
applied for and been accepted as qualifying for public
welfare, food stamps, or emergency fuel assistance programs
or similar public assistance programs.
1 2. In determining eligibility of customers not qualifying under
Section C. 1. (a), (b), or (c) above, the Utility Commission may
determine inability to pay based upon the following:
(a) A finding of "lower budget" as defined in the Bureau of
Labor Statistics Guidelines.,
(b) The most recent income tax return(s) filed by members
of the customers household.,
(c) For each employed member of the customers household, either
paycheck stubs for the last two months or a rewritten statement
from the employer of wages earned during the preceding two (2) months.,
•
•
(d) Documentation of unemployment.,
(e) Other documentation which supports the customers'
declaration of inability to pay.
D. Upon a finding by the Utility Commission that a customer has established
his or her inability to pay, the Utility Commission may require the
customer to enter into a payment agreement. The payment agreement may
contain terms and conditions for continued service, such as:
1. The customer will apply for financial assistance with the
Department of Public Welfare and /or emergency fuel assistance.
2. The customer will pay an amount monthly on account which will
bring the account into a current status within eight (8) months,
at which time the customer will enter into a budget payment plan
with 'the utility if the utility offers such a plan.
3. Such other conditions of service which the Utility Commission
and the customer may agree to and which the customer can
reasonably be expected to meet.
4. A provision for reviewing the declaration of inability to pay
at reasonable intervals.
A customer failing to comply with the payment agreement may upon ten (10)
days notice of hearing and a review by the Utility Commission be subject
to the provision of the utility service disconnect policy.
E. A residential customer who has not currently entered into a
declaration of inability to pay with the utility as previously
described and.upon becoming delinquest in payment of utility
charges and not currently having applied for and received a
certificate of declaration of inability to pay from the utility
shall be sent, by first class mail, a Delinquent Notice and
Disconnect Warning containing at a minimum the following information:
•
1'. Name, address and account number of the customer.
2. Account number and amount past due.
3. Brief description of the disconnect procedure, terms •
for continued service and any reconnection charges.
4. Customer right of appeal, who to contact to make appeal,
address, phone number, and business hours of office
accepting appeals.
5. Brief description of appeal procedures.
a ,
+.. p
!
6. Statement of procedure for application for declaration of inability
to pay and qualification.
7. Addresses and phone number of organizations and programs offering
fuel assistance to include at minimum the Department of Public
Welfare and Community Action Program.
The utility shall allow the customer reasonable time to respond to the
above mentioned notice before any further action is taken on the customers'
account. Reasonable time shall not be less than ten (10) days. A
customer failing to respond within a reasonable time may be subject to the
utility's disconnect policy. The Utility Commission may however accept a
customers application of a declaration of inability to pay at any time.
F. As a minimum, the utility's disconnect policy shall require the
following before service is disconnected:
1. First class mailing to the recorded billing address of the Delinquent
Notice and Disconnect Warning, described in Section E.
2. Not sooner than ten (10) days after mailing of the Notice and Warning
above, a disconnect notice starting the date upon which service is
subject to being disconnected, such date to be not less than seven (7)
days from date of mailing, arid, notification by mail and telephone of
the Department of Public Welfare and Community Action Group supplying
emergency fuel assistance.
3. Prior to disconnect, the following additional steps will be taken:
(a) One visit by the utility to the unit during normal business hours.
(b) If contact is not made, and there is reason to believe the unit
is occupied the utility shall make another visit during non - business
hours.
(c) If personal contact is made, the customer shall be provided the
application for Declaration of Inability to Pay and the customer
shall be given ten (10) days to apply. Failing to apply, the
' customer's service may be terminated without further notice.
4. Following disconnection, the utility will reconnect service if the
i •
residential customer or designated representative
t
}
•
• .
•
• s _
(a) agrees to pay the outstanding balance owed, or
( (b) agrees to enter a payment schedule with the utility,
or,
(c) enters into a declaration of inability to pay with
the utility.
G. It is the intent of the Utility Commission that the terms
} and conditions of this are minimum standards and are to
- be liberally construed in its application.
Passed in special session of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
this 14th day of April, 1980.
i
President: Wallace Bishop
•
ATTEST:
Mana Lou Van ElOut
•
•
•
•
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS of the UNITED STATES
trd.� M
.0* -
MAY 6 1980
Office of
Post; Quartermaster' D E P A R T M E N T M I N N E S O T A ' # TY OF SH a
SECOND DISTRICT
Post 4046
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379
5 May 1980
Honorable, Walter C. Harbeck
Mayor', City of Shakopee
Your Honor°:
Whereas in the. paat,it has been the practice of the City of
Shakopee: to contribute $50.00 to they Veterans of For.iegn Wars,
Shakopee: Posit 404 to help defray the expenses of putting on the
annual Memorial Day exercises,we. are again appraching you to contribute
the, same: amount this year.
Thanking you in., advanc9kbr your very kind. consideration,w.e: remain,
Respectively : Yours
Shakopee VFW Post; 4046,
Francis Quinn
Posit; Quartermaster
/(J - i)u 2, e
0 U��
iirjm Lrdw
aff a v - y 0 ( C/8/TO
•
•._ RECEPVr1
itZtv
APR 3 0 1980
•
I wo
association of
metropolitan • •
municipalities
•
•
•
•
• TO: MEMBER CITIES April 25, 1980
•
FROM: AMM STAFF •
•
•
. This bulletin includes the following items:
I. A concise summary of several new laws passed during the •
1980 session incorporating a significant part of the AMM •
1980 legislative program priorities.
• II. Policy Issue Request for . the AMM Study Committee •
•
III. A status summary of the complete 1979 and 1980 AMM legis-
• lative policy program.
•• Significant items summarized are: •
•
•
A. Levy Limit Changes •
• B. Property Tax Law Changes
} • C. Miscellaneous. Changes Contained in the Omnibus Tax
Bill (HF 1121):
•
•
•
1. Municipal Bond•Interest Ceiling
2. Special Assessment Appeals
•
3. Mileage Rate Limits • •
•
4. Tax Increment' Financing •
5. Local Police and Fire Retirement Funds •
6. Sales Ratio Modification -
7. Light Rail Transit Studies
D. Local Government Self Insurance •
•
E. Agricultural Preservation Districts
•
• F. Solid and Hazardous Waste
G. Subdivision Regulation
•
NOTE: This bulletin has been sent to: Mayors, Delegates,
and Chief Administrative officials.
•
•
• 300 hanover bldg. 480 cedar street, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 222 -2861
i
SUMMARY OF • SIGNIFICANT NEW LAWS
•
A. 1981 LEVY LIMIT LAPS CHANGES •
1. General Levy Limitation. The annual city and county levy
limit base increase of 6% is changed to 80. Minneapolis,
St. Paul, Duluth, Hennepin County, Ramsey County, and St.
Louis County remain at 6%.
•
2. Reverse Referendum. The 1977 -1978 one -time provision was
• • •reinstated permanently. It may be used only once for a
• maximum of 10o and only if the city or county was at 98%
•
or more of the levy limit the previous year. Cities and
• counties that utilized this provision in 1977 or 1978 may
not use it again. The only exception to the one time rule
occurs if a unit does not increase its base the maximum
•
• • 100 (i.e., a city could use it any number of times, but the
cummulative base increase could not exceed 10 %) Minneapolis,
. St. Paul, Duluth, Hennepin County, Ramsey County, and St. •
Louis County are excluded.
• 3. Special Levies. Special Levy (o); Provides an INFLATION
ADJUSTMENT in the computation of the special levy for
decreased local revenues from municipal enterprises,
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORES, licenses, permits, fines and forfeits.
i E.XAMPLE: Liquor Store Revenue - 1971 $ 200.000 •
(x) CPI from•1971 to 1980 (Est. 90%) •• x .1.9
(=) Inflation adjusted 1971 revenue $ 380,000
( -) Current Revenue ($ 220,000)
( -) Population (10,000) x .02 per
Capita Levy Limit Base ($80) ($ 16,000)
•
(=) Allowable Special Levy $ 144,000 •
• Special Levy(s); Provides a new special levy to recover
. revenue lost from property tax abatements or court judg-
} • ments due to state ordered reassessments. (Primarily affects
counties.) •
•
4. General Per Capita Levy Limit, Chapter 275.11. This chapter
• allows a general per capita limit of $54 adjusted for infla-
tion to equal approximately $169 in 1980. Previous inter-
.
; -pretation allowed a maximum of $54 for bonded debt and the
remainder for general levy. New law clarifies that any
portion of the $169 may be bonded debt.
5. Transmission Lines. Transmission lines of 69kv or greater
will be locally assessed and taxed where located except in •
an unorganized township. The amount of revenue generated
to local units for 1981 taxes will be added to the units
levy limit base for 1982. •This is to replace a previous
• • utility tax distribution.
-1-
•
I .
•
•
.,B.' 1981 PROPERTY TAX LAW CHANGES
-• Property Classification System Changes
Payable - Payable 1981
Classification 1980 • Old 1981 New 1981
Ag. Non- Homestead (Cl. 3) 25% 22% 19%
Seasonal Rec. Res. (C1.3) 25% 22% 21%
Ag. Homestead (01. 3b)
1st $25,,000 Base Value Index is repealed 12% 12% 14%
2nd $25,000 . • 25% 22% 14%
• Excess over $50,000 25% 22% 19%
Timber (01. 3c) 20% 20% 19%
Non -Ag. Homestead (Cl. 3c)
•
1st $25,000
•
18% 17% • 16%
. 2nd $25,000 30% 28%* • 22%
Excess over $50,000 30% 28% 28%
.Residential Non - Homestead .
3d - Apartments' 40% 40% 38% •
•
3dd - 3 units or less 32% • 32% 28%
•
Vacant Land 430• 43% 400
Honme.stead Credit Base Maximum % 50% 55% 58%
• Homestead Credit - Maximum $550 $600 $650
- Other Property, Tax Law Changes
•
1. Title II property declared tax exempt by the Rio Vista Supreme
Court decision is made taxable. Title II property which formerly
qualified for a 5% classification rate will remain at 5%, but all
new Title II property will be assessed at 20%.'
2. Class 3cc and Title II property will be valued and assessed at.two
rates, the current payable rate and the rate that would apply for .
other like properties. The dollar difference will be remitted to
local units by the state. These amounts will be included within •
the levy limitation.
3. Owner occupied mobile homes will be •taxed as real property instead
of personal property, and may qualify for 3cc treatment.
4. Delinquent Property Taxes and Special Assessments.
i •
t '
Penalty rates are not changed, but the timing is such that the full
3 penalty is .not applied immediately. The annual interest rate is
. increased from 6% to 8%. .
•
•
-
•
•
5. Property Tax Payrient from County. The settlement dates are changed
to the fifth (5th) day of March, June, and November. Payments are
to be based on all funcls on hand by these dates. The interest
accrued to local units on funcls held beyond 45 days by the county
shall be 8%.
C. '.IISCELLANEOUS 1981 BILL MEASURES
1. Municipal Bond Interest Ceiling. G. 0. Bond maximum interest rate
is increased from 7% to 12% effective until December 31, 1982 at
which time the maximum rate becomes 9%. On that same date the rate
for industrial revenue bonds go from no limit to a 9% maximum. The
• .rate for special assessments is set at 15 higher than the maximum •
• • selling rate. (i.e., 13% until December 31, 1982 and thereafter 10`,0). •
Negotiated sales are increased from $100,000 to $200,000.
•
2. Special Assessment Appeals. Special assessment hearings may now be
held prior to contract letting. An appeal to district court may be
made only if written objection is filed before - or'at the hearing
unless reasonable cause for not doing so can be shown. The assess
ment hearing may be adjourned to a later date to consider additional
objections or findings. -
•
3. Mileage Rate Limits.' A county, city, town, or school district govern-
ing body may set any mileage reimbursement rate it determines. A
local unit is no longer limited by the rate set by the state commissione:
of personnel.
4. Tax Increment Financing. The 1980 changes are primarily technical
• corrections for wrong sites, errors, and definitions in the 1979
law including Commissioner of Revenue language to implement the
legislative intent concerning fiscal disparities. The intent was
to require fiscal disparities contributions by or on behalf of all
• new tax increment districts, but to provide the option to the govern-
ing body of the city of taking the contribution from the district or
spreading it outside the district. New language provides that abate-
ments or legislative classification ratio changes resulting in lower
tax revenues will be spread proportionately between the original base
and new captured assessed value. Another significant change allows
the authority, developer, and assessor to arrive at a minimum esti-
mated market value and contract for the assignment of that value
upon completion of the improvement. This does not preclude the value
being greater, but does assure at least a minimum value for which tax
increment will be available.
5. Local Police and Fire Retirement Funds. All local (32 cities)
police or salaried firefighters relief associations are required
to phase out by providing that all newly employed police officers
or salaried firefighters have their retirement coverage from the
Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PERA -P&F) rather than the
local relief association, unless a municipality elects prior to July 1,
1980 to retain the local relief association and not phase out. All
local police and salaried firefighters relief associations are re-
• quired to amortize by December 31, 2010. An amortization state aid
program is established to assist municipalities with relief associa-
tions which phase out in meeting the newly implemented amortization
• requirement. Limited benefit increases are granted to current
members in the various relief associations.
•
-3- •
•
•
6. Sales Ratio Modification. The Department of Revenue was granted
$100,000 to implement the recommendations of the legislative: re-
' port on sales ratio study.
7. Light Rail Transit Studies. The Metropolitan council was granted
$150,000 to study the feasibility of light rail transit in the
Metropolitan Area.
D. SELF INSURANCE. (Chapter 528 -529 Laws 1980)
Chapter 528 permits any city, county, or school district having 100 or
more employees to self insure for employee health benefits. Any com-
bination of units may combine to achieve the 100 or more employee group;
however, if they pool, the pool must comply with the rules of the State
Commissioner of Insurance. Chapter 529 permits any city or county but
not school district to self insure for any other risk regardless of
size. It also permits pooling with the provision of compliance with
State Commissioner of insurance rules. It is expected that the administra-
tion of pools will be fairly strictly regulated.
E. AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION DISTRICTS. •
This law is.applicable in the Metropolitan Area only. Cities may
designate certain lands in the metropolitan rural service area as
qualifying for agricultural preservation districts. Once designated, a
landowner•in that district meeting standards set by the Greenacres
Statute may request certification. The land will then be valued and
assessed for agricultural use. Its use cannot be changed for eight (8)
years unless declared an emergency by the Governor for a special purpose
such as a waste disposal site. In such a case the Environmental Quality
Board can delay eminent domain proceedings for one year pending studies.
The land is protected from special assessments frorti other governmental
projects. Property taxes will be calculated at the local mill rate and
105% of the statewide township agricultural mill rate. The landowner
will pay whichever is less and the local units of government reimbursed
. the difference if the local mill rate would have generated more revenue.
F. SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE. (HF 2023)
1. General. The bill which was signed into law on April 14th provides
a detailed and comprehensive process and procedure for siting several
types of waste disposal facilities including hazardous waste, munici-
pal solid waste,' and sewage sludge. It establishes a nine member
Waste Management Board (WMB) consisting of one person from each
congressional district and a full time chairman, all of whom are
appointed by the Governor.
• 2. Hazardous Waste - Statewide. The WMB will select six locations in
the state as candidate sites for hazardous waste disposal. The
sites are to be selected by August 1, 1981. After the sites are
selected, a local project review committee is established for each
location selected as a candidate site. Each of the six local project
review committees then appoints a temporary member to the WMB. The
WMB, composed of its permanent and temporary members, then will
'.select a site or sites from the candidate sites. The WMB then
has the authority to acquire the land for these sites by eminent
domain, and to establish these sites regardless•of the existing •
land use or any land use controls adopted by the host community
(zoning override). The sites would then be leased to•a private
-4-
•
operator to implement and to run the disposal facility. The •
W'.1B must prepare a report by January 1, 1982 for the legislature
on methods of mitigating and compensating for the local risks,
costs, and other adverse effects of various types of hazardous •
waste facilities, and on methods of financing mitigation and com-
pensation measures.. •
3. Solid Waste - Metro Area
•
• The Metropolitan Council is required to prepare a report on the
potential for abating the need for and practice of land disposal .
of mixed municipal solid waste. This report is to be used by
the counties in developing land disposal abatement plans.
By June 1, 1981, each metropolitan county is required to adopt
an inventory of five proposal sites the county for'solid
waste disposal facilities and submit the inventory to the Metro-
politan Council for approval. The Metropolitan Council then
determines how many sites are needed in each county based on the
Council's Policy Plan. Each county then forms a County Site Selec-
tion Authority consisting of the County Board and one person
selected by the governing body of each of the communities con-
taining one of the proposed sites in the county's inventory of •
sites. The County Site Selection Authority will then select
the appropriate number of sites in accordance with the number
determined to be needed in that county by June 1, 1983. The
county then has the authority to acquire the land for these
• sites regardless of the existing land use or any land use con-
trol adopted by the host community. (zoning override)
By January 1, 1982, the Metropolitan Council shall report to
the legislature on methods of mitigating and compensating for
the local risks, costs and other adverse effects of solid waste
disposal facilities, and on method of financing mitigation and
compensation measures. The methods of compensation shall include,
• • but not be limited to, payment outside of levy limitation in lieu
of taxes for all property taken off the tax rolls, preference for
the city or town containing a facility in federal'A -95 reviews,
payment of all costs to service these facilities, etc.
•
4. Sewage Sludge Metro •
Sets up a three year process including the EIS procedure for
selecting permanent sites for the disposal of sewage sludge and
ash. Includes local input and MCA involvement. While permanent
sites are being identified, selected, and implemented, the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission may use any site owned by
the Commission for the purpose of landspreading sewage sludge for
a period not to exceed four years.. The sludge spreading can
only be done under the same conditions as sewage sludge is
applied on private property. -
5. " Solid Waste Disposal Bonds and Obligations
The Metropolitan Council is authorized to issue general obliga-
tion bonds to provide funds for the acquisition and development
of solid waste disposal and processing facilities. The proceeds
of the bonds shall be used by the Council to make grants to the
•
-5-
•
•
•
•
Metropolitan Counties. Each city or town in which a
waste disposal facili_y is operating after January 1, 1980
. shall be permanently exempt from the debt service payments
to retire such bonds.
There are many•more provisions of the bill, but the above
provides a general saamary of the important features as it
affects cities in the metropolitan area. •
•
G. SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (Chapter 566)
•
The bill repeals the existing laws, relating to the definition of plat-
ting authority, the procedure for extra- territorial application of
subdivision regulations by cities, the law relating to the term of
subdivision regulations, and the law relating to the process of plat
approval. New provisions are enacted on these subjects as well as •
on other matters as follows:
The law permits cities to regulate all "subdivisions ", defined to mean
the separation of an area, parcel, or tract of land under single
ownership into two or more parcels, tracts, lots, or long -terra lease -
hold interests, for residential, commercial, industrial, or other
use, except for these types of separations: where all the resulting
parcels, tracts, lots, or interests will be 20 acres or larger in
size and.500 feet in width. for residential usage, and 5 acres or
larger in size for commercial and industrial uses; for creating •
cemetary lots; and divisions resulting from court orders, or the
adjustment of a lot line by the relocation of a common boundary.
The law relating to the adoption of interim land use ordinances•is
amended to provide that if a municipality is conducting or has
authorized a study to be conducted, or has held or scheduled hear-
ings for the purposes of considering adoption or amendment of a com-
prehensive plan or official controls, or if new territory for which
•plans or controls have not been adopted is annexed to a municipality, .
the governing body of the municipality may adopt an interim ordinance
which may regulate, restrict or prohibit any use, development or sub-
division within the jurisdiction or a portion thereof for a period
not to exceed one year from the date it is effective. .
The subdivision regulations may require that a reasonable portion of
any proposed subdivision be dedicated to the public or preserved for
public' use as streets, roads, sewers, electric, gas, and water
facilities, storm water drainage and holding areas or ponds, and
similar utilities and improvements. • In addition, the regulations
• may require that a reasonable portion of any proposed subdivision he
dedicated to the public or preserved for public use as parks, play-
grounds, trails, or open space; provided that: the municipality may
choose to accept an equivalent amount in cash from the applicant for
part or all of the portion required to be dedicated based on the fair
market value of the land no later than at the time of final approval;
any cash payments received must be placed in a special fund by the
municipality'and used for the purposes for which the money was obtained;
in establishing the reasonable portion to be dedicated, the regulations
may consider the open space, park, recreational, or commonaries and •
facilities which the applicant purposes to reserve for the subdivision;
and the municipality reasonably determines that it will'need to acquire .
• -6- •
•
•
•
• that portion ofland for the purposes stated in this paragraph as
the result of the approval of the subdivision. •
•
The review proceedings for subdivision regulations are rewritten. The
regulations may provide for the consolidation of the preliminary and
final review and approval or disapproval of subdivisions. Preliminary.
or final approval may be granted or denied "for parts of subdivision
regulations. The regulations may prescribe fees sufficient to defray
the costs incurred by the municipality in the review and investigation
of enactions upon these applications. A subdivision application must
be preliminary approved or disapproved within 120 days following de-
livery of an application completed in compliance with the municipal
ordinance by the applicant to the municipality, unless an extension
.of the review period has been agreed to by the applicant. When a
division or subdivision to which the regulations of the municipality
do not apply is presented to the city,•the clerk of the municipality
must within ten days certify that the subdivision regulations of the
municipality do not apply to the particular subdivision. Following
• preliminary approval, the applicant may request final approval by the
municipality, and upon this request a .municipality must certify final
approval within 60 days if the applicant has complied with all conditions
and requirements of applicable..regulations and all conditions and re-
. ,
quirements upon which the preliminary approval is expressly conditioned.
If the municipality fails to certify final approval as required, and if
the applicant has complied with all conditions and requirements, the
application must be deemed finally approved.
A person conveying a new parcel of land which, or the plat for which,
has not previously been filed or recorded, and which is part of, or
would constitute a subdivision to which adopted municipal subdivision
regulations apply, must attach to the instrument of conveyance either:
requireable certification by the clerk of municipality that the sub-
. division regulations do not apply, or that the subdivision has been
approved by the governing body, or that the restrictions on the division
of taxes and filing and recording have been waived by resolution of •
• the governing body because compliance would create an unnecessary hard-
ship and failure to comply will not interfere with the purpose of the
regulations; or a statement which names and identifies the location
of the appropriate municipal offices and advises the grantee that
municipal subdivision and zoning regulations may restrict the use or
restrict or prohibit the development of the parcel, or construction
on it, and that the division of taxes and the filing or recording of
• the conveyance may be prohibited without prior recordable certifica-
tion of approval, non - applicability, or waiver from the municipality.
The existing law relating to the probibition of filing metes and
bounds land is amended to provide that this prohibition does not
apply to separate parcels of land not less than five acres in area
or 300 feet in width on July 1, 1980; or two single parcels of
commercial or indistrial land of not less than five acres and having
a width of not less than 300 feet whose conveyance does not result
in the division of the parcel into two or more lots or parcels, any
one of which is less than five acres in area or 300 feet in width;
or two single parcels of residential or agricultural land of not less
than 20 acres and having a width of not less than 500 feet which con-
veyance does not result in the division of the parcel into two or more
lots or parcels, any one of which is less than 20 acres in area or 500
-7-
feet in width. Thus divisions of residential or agricultural land
which result in parcels of less than 20 acres having a width of 500
feet or less cannot be recorded unless the division occurs in accordance
with the municipality's subdivision regulations.
Effective August 1, 1980. • • •
•
II. POLICY ISSUE REQUEST
•
The AMM study committees will begin the annual policy development and
issue study process soon. One activity will be to go through current
policy and modify as appropriate, based on previous legislative action
and current conditions. However, another important part of the process
• is to discuss and develop new policy concerning new issues.
Therefore, the AMM Board of Directors is requesting input from
•
.member cities as to issues that you feel'the committees and organ-
ization study and develop policy for in the next biennium. We are
primarily concerned with Metropolitan issues,but may consider topics •
of statewide interest where there is a significant impact on Metro-
politan area cities.
The five AMM standing committees are:
•
• - Metropolitan Agencies
- Revenue and Expenditures
- General Legislation •
- Housing
- Transportation
•
•
Please discuss as a council any issues which you consider important
for the organization and notify the AMM by returning this notice with
your concerns listed on the form printed on the back of this page.
•
•
•
•
•
•
• •
•
•
•
•
•
•
• •
•
-8-
•
•
..xr.:.....w.u:e'y.l Ij t ...Ff6+ii+..MON, ✓rr+i:wws�w:.. _.._
•
•
•
•
Return to.: ' •
•
•
Association* of`•Ietropolitan Municipalities • •
Director of Legislative Affairs •
• 300 Hanover Building
• 480 Cedar Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
•
New issues for AMM Study Committee consideration: •
•
•
1.
•
•
2.
•
• 3. •
•
•
•
4.
• •
• •
•
5. •
•
• •
6.
•
7.
•
•
•
•
8. •
•
9.
•
•
•
10. .
•
•
•
•
•
-9-
.
ti
•
•
•
•
association of
metropolitan- • .
'
•
municipalities •
•
•
•
• III
1979 -1980 AMM POLICY STATUS
Attached is a status summary of 1979 -1980 AMM action •
_ policy. A statute or bill number is included where .
law was enacted and a date is included where the
policy is one of maintenance or opposition. A brief
description of the law change or policy status is
provided.
Action Policies for 1979 - 1980 69
Policy Accomplished or partially
• met 46
Recap- Policy Activity
Maintenance or Opposition 1979 -1980 6
Accomplished 1979 • 16 •
• • Partially met 1980 7
Accomplished 1980 17
TOTAL • 46
•
•
•
•
300 hanover bldg. 480 cedar street, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 222 -28.61 •
AMM POLICY SUMMARY FOR 1979-80
. - • .
i . . . ..
. - d . •
3 . . .
1 . . .
POLICY CHAPTER/ •
POLICY N0.
.— ......... ___ POLICY OESCUfPTTON
. . . . . _ MI / BILL NO. ST11T0::/coMmENT
....._____ • ________ .
i .
1 . . .1 - A - Lovu Limit 16:pea:I - - No eonsiderationhu the LogisIature
'..
' . .
L I-P-1 NealisIie Levu Limit Yes 1980
1 - .
. index HP .1121 Levy Limit base index increased from
to S::: per year beyinniny 1981.
a . Cil or the rirst class and the
z1 .
Ihrce respective counties remain at 6
. .
. .
1 . I-8-2
Mandated Programs -
- -
.cpocial LovIos Passed Housc.. in 1.9Y9 and 1 980.
NtiminaL(.d rrom Einal tax hiJI
in conEurence.
1 .
.E-L1-3 Natural Disaster/Lawful
- -
- -
Passed House in 1979 and 1980.
Order Special Levies
Eliminated from final tax bill
in conference.
I .
13H0 .-; p re i a I I v y r o .r. S pe c: l a 1 - - No consideraLion by LegislaLure
Elections . • ' (Bills 'introduced)
' Staff Enternrise Fund Special Yes 1980 Indexes the enterprise revenue amount
Levy (Liquor Stores) HF 1121 in 1971 by the CPI. The special
• levy equals 1971 enterprise revenue
amount (indexed by CPI) minus current
revenue amount minus 2% of per capita
, . . .
Levy base times population. .
: .
Staff State ordered reassess- Yes 1980 Revenue lost due to a court order or
men': Revenue Loss • HP 1121 abatement resultiny Erom reasSuss-
Special Levy . ment by the commissioner ef revenue
is recoverable by this special levy.
Unlike special levy (o), this allows
, .
for full recovery, not just non-speci
. • levy revenue. .
- -
. .
- • . I-B-4 Reverse Referendum Yes ' 1980 Reverse referendum becomes permanent.
HF 1121 It may be used up to a maximum of 10%
. . .
base increase if a city or county (no
. .
• of the 1st class) is at or above 98%
• of its levy limit the previous year
•
. .
. .
. .
_ •
. .
... .. _ _ _ _ _ ..... _ _ ... , .. _... _ .
t ' ~ POLICY NO. POLICY DESCRIPTION MET ] TT<T. NO. STATUS /COMMENT
I -B -4 - Continued Generally, it may be used only once,
1 • • . including any use in 1977 or 1978.
• If the first use results in a less
• • than 10% increase, this provision
• may be used again, but only to a
•
. collective amount of 10%.
I -B -5 Levy Limit Exclusion ' • Discussed in House Tax Committee
• to 5,000 population ' - • - 'but not included in Tax Bill. •
DOD Levy Limit Adjustments Yes 1979 • Any city less than 85 of county per • . Chapter. capita average increases to 85%. Levy
. . 303 base may be increased for .rcruse col-
.
• ' lcction and street - maintenance in 1979
only, if these are currently funded or
underfunded some other way.
Staff Per Capita Levy Limit - Yes 1980 • (LMC•policy) Clarifies that Bonded
Chapter 275.11 HF 1121 debt levy may exceed $54 per capita
and that bonded debt and general levy
may be any combination of per capita
dollars not to exceed $169 in 1980. •
I -C -1 State Aid Increase Yes 1979 1980 aids increased $5 to $64 plus
Chapter Minneapolis catagorical aid for pen-
.
. 303 sions of $4.5 million (Mpls. receives
• no aid increase in 1980. 1981 aids
increased $6 to $70.)
I -C -2 State Aid - Socio Yes 1979 New state aid formula based on Levy
Economic Chapter limit base minus an amount equal to
303 10 equalized mills and limited to a
range increase of 12% to 20% based
on current per capita receipts.
I -C -3 • State Aid - Mill Rate Yes 1979 Use of mill rate excluded except for
• • Chapter cities under 2,500 population and
. 303 those receiving munimum aid increases.
I -D -1 Tax Exempt Property .- - No consideration by the legislature.
(Bills introduced.)
•
• -2- .
t POLICY NO. POLICY DESCRIPTION MET BILL NO. STATUS /COMMENT
I -D -2 3cc and Title II Housing Yes 1980 The state will reimburse local govern-
HP 1121 'ments the difference between actual
•
taxes paid and the amount that would
•
I
be paid if the property were assessed
as other like property.(Not excluded
• from Levy Limits)
I -D -3 Maintenance of Real
• - - No consideration by the Legislature.
Property (Bills Introduced)
•
•
I -D -4 Tax /Assessment. Delin- Partial 1980 The annual interest rate charged for
quencies Chapter delinquent taxes is increased from 6%
• 437 to 8 %. •
I -D -5 Public Property Acquisi- - - No consideration by the Legislature.
tion
•
•
• I -D -6 Billboard Advertising Dropped - Policy eliminated due to court ruling
• Property Tax that this is not a valid tax.
I -D -7 Property Tax Distribu- Partial 1980 Changes the settlement date to the 5th
tion • • Chapter - day of March, June, and November. Pay
418 ments are to be based on all funds on
hand by these dates. Interest on un-
paid funds after 45 days shall be 8 %.
•
• I -E -1 Eliminate Limited Market Yes 1979 Reaches full market value in 2 years.
Value Chapter , Taxable value rates for homestead
• 303 property reduced as follows 1979
(20 %/33 %) 1980 (18 %/30 %) 1981 (16 %/22 %,
28 %) Homestead credit increased to
$550 in 1980 and $650 in 1981.
I -E -2 Sales Ratio Equaliza- Partial ' 1980 $100,000 was appropriated to the
tion HP 1121 Commissioner of Revenue to study
and implement a new sales ratio
computation system- .
I -E -3 Co- efficient of Disper- Yes 1979 Delayed for two years to 1982. A bill
sion Penalty. Chapter will be considered in 1981 to change
303 the penalty rates and ranges.
•
•
• -3-
•
•
•
_o. c ':'. NO. 1.'JLIC ,;;: ;L�: :'3 MET '. BILL NO. ..._w ..- SJ'A1'US /CO13i11,' IY'
1 .
•
I -E -4 A Procedure for Yes 1979 -80 No chap es•were made in 1979 or
g 1980.
' Office Hotel Property '
ro ert
/ P y Phis fulfills policy requirements.
(AMM opposes changes.) .
I -F -1 . Tax Increment Financing Yes 1979 LMC /NAHRO /AMM'Bill passed. •
(1979) - • Chapter .
322 .
I -F -1 .
Tax Increient Financing Yes 1980 . • .
Primarily makes technical changes 'to
(1980) (Modifications) HF 1121 the 1979 Tax Increment Financing Law
•to more closely conform'to purpose
• and intent or law. Allows cities to .
•
enter into contracts with developers
for estimated minimum market value.
I -F -2 Reinvestment Fund - - No consideration by the Legislature.
(Bill Introduced)
i .
I -F -3 Redevelopment Con- • Yes 1979 Deferment at local option for period
1 struction Incentives Chapter of. construction for redevelopment.
. 322
I -F -4 Fiscal Notes - - Bills considered but not passed in
• 1979 or 1980.
•
I -F -5 Minn. City Fiscal Study Yes • 1979 $202,000 allocated to State Planning
Chapter- Agency for city fiscal study. $200,000
303 & 333 allocated to Tax Study Commission for
local aids study.
I - - Hotel /Motel Amusement Tax - - No consideration by the Legislature
I -F -7 Federal Revenue Shariny Federal - Being considered by Congress. City
shares will probably remain the same.
The state share will probably be
eliminated. .
II - Shade Tree Program Yes '1979 $25,000,000 funding for grants - to
• Chapter local units. Special levy extended
257 & 333 for 2 years. All other policy pro-
visions met. .
-4-
r . i,'_ O. :'0LI Y DESCRIPTION MST BILL NO. Si ATUS /COi•iMe:NT
II -13 • Municipal Self Insurance Yes 1980 '
• Chapters Passed. C.i. tip :rs can self insure indi-
f 528 & 529 vicluall y or through joint powers. . "
L
II -C Agricultural Land Use/ Partial 1980 Green Acres law unchanged but an
. Green Acres IIF 1.612 Agricultural Preserves district was
.• created for Metropolitan Area Zoning.
• Cities may designate land in the Rura
• Service Area for agricultural presery
A landowner may agree to participate.
_1',cnyth of time is 8 years. The land-
' owner receives certain tax benefits.
Cities recover loss of revenue, if an
from state reimbursement.
' II -D Minnesota Municipal Board Yes 1979 AMI.1 /LMC Consolidation bill passed.
• Chapter '
• • 287
II -E 911 Emergency Tel. Ser.v. Partial 1979 -80 Legislature maintened the philosophy
of state funding for major 911 costs
,.but did not provide funds in 1980.
II -F Veterans Preference Partial 1979 -80 No action in 1979 or 1980. This
partially fulfills policy requirement:
I.I -G Tree Removal and Treat- Yes 1979 -80 No statewide licensing. AMM supports
ment Licensing local determination.
II -H Highway Turnbacks - - No consideration by the Legislature.
II -I Judicial System - - No consideration. by the Legislature.
II -J Watershed Districts - - - No consideration by the Legislature.
II -K Signal Light Maintenance - ' - • No consideration by the Legislature,
Will work with MN DOT this summer:.
• May not require Legislation..
II -L Oppose Elimination of • Yes 1979 -'80. Bills introduced but defeated in •
3.2 Beer committee.
-5- • •
.. ?. ..__ !W. i'[)1..4( 1..� i'rt.iO ! i t . 1 • Is 1 LL 1'i ti. :4 -- - .
.
II -M Special Elections for ' Bill passed both houses but died'in
Statutory Cities - - Conference Committee when election
law recodification was attached by
• the Senate and not accepted by the
House.
II -N - Local Police and Fire • Yes 1980 Bil1 includes phaseout �Z• • de pha e ut of 1oc� a •pen -
•
Pension Funds • IIF 1121 sion funds, aids to cities phasing
' •out the fund, and a requirement for
• new employees to become part of PERA.
BOD Automatic Municipal . Yes • 1979 Recount is automatic upon request if •
Election recount Chapter the vote spread is within certain
• 90 ranges (approx. 1% up to'10,000)
•
BOD Plymouth Storm Sewer Yes 1979 Passed foi Plymouth and Golden •
•
Taxing District Chapter • Valley. Allows Storm Sewer Taxing
303 District as well •as Assessment Dist.
BOD' Municipal Bond Interest Yes 1980 Limits raised from 7% to 12% until
Rate Limit HF 1121 Dec. 31, 1982 at which time the limit
reverts to 9% and IDR bonds become
limited at 9%. Assessment interest
rates may be 1% higher than maximum
• and negotiated sales are increased
from $100,000 to $200,000.
BOD Oppose Attorney General Yes 1980 Bills were defeated that proposed
. as Municipal Bond Counsel those positions.
and .state controlling all.
Bond sales. .
Staff Special Assessment Clari- Yes 1980 • . (LMC Policy) Special assessment
fication IIF 1121 hearings may be held prior to project,
. and in order to appeal a special
assessment, a person must appear at
I the hearing. Appeals after 30 days
aflz.ar assessment role is finalized is
prohibited. This clim.i.n�ites Lhroug11
district court unespectcd al=ter pro- .
jcct assessment reductions.
-6- .
•
c ;!• • POLICY DESCRIPTION MET .SILL NO. STATUS / /:C1•;1:::;NT , •
•
•
Staff Mileage Rates Yes 1980 (LMC Policy) Permits local. units to
HF.1121 set mileage reimbursement rates at
their discretion with no state unposed
limit.
III -C Legislative !lousing Yes 1979 Committees re-established
•
III -v No mandatory zoning Yes 1979 -80 No legislative mandates in this area.
I C.1.1 -1i MUi A - Broader Latitude: Yes 1979 :;evera l new programs authorized 1'e)r•
•
Chapter low and moderate income families
327
1 1 -t•• Rehab. funding ,•ont: i nun- Yes 1979 Funding extended. Bonding ro.r. low
1 i„n Chapter and !node :: :Jt. income housing mrrr•(",l,,clr
• 327 increased significantly.
lll?il Legislation Expansion - - • No action.
J.'TI -11 • • Low Income !lousing Bond - • - No action. Met Council di 1 not intro-
c ;u•rr•nntcc' l-und duce b.i.1.1. in 1979 -80.
IV.? 3 &4 Comprehensive Governance - - No action during 1979 -80 in this area.
Study.
• IV.A -5 No Ektensions of MC Powers Yes 1979 -80 Were successful in killing a new
• unless certain criteria met power in Housing Area. Expanded.
power granted in Solid Waste Area
consistent with AMM Policy.
IV., -1 Administrative Conduct Partial 1980 • • A serious attempt was made to include
of Metropolitan Agencies . • . the Metro Agencies under State APA.
• This proposal was defeated with our
• help. Second half of AMM Policy not
gccQmp1ished .
•
IV.B - Metropolitan Council - - No action during 1979 -80 in this area
Jurisdiction '
IV.B -2 Comprehensive Planning Yes 1979 -80 No change in Legislation, additional
Maintenance money provided in 1979 session. •
-7- "
• • •
J'i?t../ ..'JlAPTRJ1/ . >.
M1
r. r O. , ' .MET BILL N 5' ' ` l
� 1 ^r.�l..'L'c i1 ` .
POLICY I)L:':;CJ;11 1'I UN � 1'/1'1. fl., CUtflfls N'l' •�
IV.B -4 Hazardous & Solid Waste Yes - 1980 A11 AM14 Membership and Board Policy
• Management • •HF 2023 included except local override position
• Signed. by Governor 4/14/80
•
IV.B -5&6 Amendments to Comprehensive - - New policies adopted in January. .Most
( Plans and Plan. Amendments of policy can be implemented without
Legislative action and will work en-
. ,
•
this prior to the 1981 Legislative
•
• 'Session.
•
IV.B -7 Subdivision Regulations Yes 1980 All issues raised by LMC and AMM in- •
and Plat Approval. • HF 1617 eluded in bill as passed. •
•
IV.E 3C Transportation Plan- •
ning -Local Official in- • • •
volvement process - - • Will assess policy and determine if
this should be pursued in future years.
IV.F Energy and Mass Transit Yes 1980 150,000 provided to Met Council to
Alternatives HF 1121 make a study. Met Council Policy
• plans will also be revised.
•
NOTE: "Staff" policy is a non organization position that staff felt benefited cities and, there- •
fore, lobbied for as appropriate. Some of these included LMC policy positions.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-8-
4 ;
( MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Standard Oil Settlement Refunds
DATE: April 29, 1980 ,
The following payments /assessment reductions have been made to the
concerned parties as per Mr. Krass's recommendation and Council action.
The net effect is a reduction in the assessment of 46.27 %.
COST ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
NAME • PARCEL 4/ REFUND ASSESSMENT REFUND CREDIT
John Ries 27- 001 - 0000 - 090 -00) )$ 505.80 $9,305.05 $4,305.45 $
27- 001 - 0000 - 094 -00)
•
Northern States Lumber 27 -001- 0000 - 092 -00) 4,335.53
27- 001 - 0000 - 093 -00) )279.70 31,233.57 8,671.06
27- 001 - 0000 - 121 -00) 1,445.18
Leander Scherer 27- 001 - 0000 - 095 -00) 11,336.90 1,783.50
27- 001 - 0000 - 100 -00) 3,462.08
Joseph & Marie Jenn 27- 001 - 0000 - 096 -00 2,840.05 2,636.68 1,219.99
Howard Krohn 27- 001 - 0000 - 101 -00 1,264.50 2,782.55 1,287.48
Merlin Grev 27- 001 - 0000 - 097 -00 252.90 1,997.33 924.16
Henry Heyda 27- 001 - 0000 - 098 -00 505.80 1,625.12 751.94
Ron Scherer 27- 001 - 0000 - 099 -00 4,230.54 1,957.47
R.E. Kanne 27- 001 - 0000 - 102 -00) 1,736.38
27- 001 - 0000 - 106 -00) )126.45 11,551.20 1,876.34
27 -001- 0000 - 107 -00) 1,732.01
Edward Sager 27 -001- 0000 - 103 -00 2,239.26 1,036.10
Bert Noterman 27- 001 - 0000 - 104 -00 3,858.34 1,785.25
Harven M. Peterson. 27 -001- 0000 - 105 -00 2,024.60 936.78
Dominic Paul Fratus 27 -001- 0000 - 110 -00 126.45 2,867.07 1,326.59
Gerhard Schmitt 27- 001 - 0000 - 111 -00 75.85 4,390.00 2,031.25
•
b
r
F „
- `Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
= Standard Oil Settlement Refunds
± April 29, 1980'
Page 2
COST ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
NAME PARCEL 1l REFUND ASSESSMENT REFUND CREDIT
Rahr Malting Company 27 -001- 0000 - 120 -00) $ $ $ $3,264.22
27 -00.1- 0000 - 117 -00) ) 9,044.50
27- 001 - 0000 - 118 -00) 920.67
Milwaukee R.R. ' 27- 001 - 0000 - 123 -01) 4,301.30
27- 001- 0000 - 119 -01) )16,600.20 998.51
27- 001 - 0000 - 121 -01) 1,997.03
27- 001 - 0000 - 126 -01) 384.07
Shakopee Associates 27 -001- 0000 - 127 -00 3,722.02 1,722.17
Ora Kopisca 27- 001 - 0000 - 126 -00 1,153.02 533.50
$5,977.50 $122,597.95 $10,817.05 $45,908.96
• GV /ljw
•
•
Lew Offices of n ,_ , -
T J 3 �V'W"�'
.KRASS, MEYER & KANNING
Chartered Phillip R. Kress
Barry K. Meyer
Shakopee Professional Building �,;; -•
1221 Avenue East
.; T_ Kanning
Shakopee, Fourth Minnesota 55379 `N A E r; X }
(612) 445-5080
•APR,2.2 1980
April 18, 1980
•
The Honorable Chief Justice Robert Sheran
Minnesota Supreme Court
State Capitol •
. St. Paul, MN 55101
•
The Honorable Justice Fallon Kelly
Minnesota Supreme Court
State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55101
•
RE: METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION vs.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE AND THE COUNTY OF SCOT
COURT FILE NO: 50269
•
Dear Sirs: •
The City of Shakopee is in receipt of Mr. Graven's April 17,
1980 letter relative to the above- referenced appeal.
We would agree with the Waste Control Commission that the
issues of whether or not sewage sludge constitutes hazardous
waste, and further whether or not a "sludge farm" owned and
operated by the MWCC is subject to local zoning are made
moot by the legislation referred to in Mr. Graven's letter,
The City of Shakopee would also suggest that whether or not
the use'of the Scottland site as a "sludge farm" by the MWCC
constitutes an agricultural use under the R -1 Zoning Classi-
fication within the City of Shakopee Zoning Ordinance is also
moot. As Shakopee reads the newly enacted legislation, local
zoning 3.:7, immaterial to the use of any property as a sludge
farm. t sludge farm will be cited within approximately three
years u:aler the terms of the new legislation and it will be
cited irrespective of any zoning classification or present
use since Section 473.153, Subd. 2, states, "no land shall be
excluded from consideration for candidacy except land determined
by the agency to be intrinsically unsuitable."
•
•
F •
•
The Honorable Chief Justice Robert Sheran
The Honorable Justice Fallon Kelly
Page 2
April 18, 1980
Shakopee would join with the Waste Control Commission in point-
ing out the passage and signing of the Waste Management Act of
1980 because of its direct impact on the issues which have been
presented to the.Court by virtue of the appeal and would join
in any formal or informal request needed to withdraw those
issues which are mated, if such a withdrawal is considered by
the Court to be appropriate.
Yours very truly,
KRASS, MEYER & KANNING CHARTERED
Phillip R..Krass
• PRK:kp
cc: Mr. David L. Graven
f Shakopee
Mr. Mark Stromwell
•
•
•
•
Attorneys at Law j r _�,Ii'l 4 ' HOLMES & GRAVEN •
lemEs S. HoLMEX < U `/" � CHARTERED
DA) t L. GR‘YEN \ �!
' • LARRY M. WERIHEIM 4 IDS Center. Minneapolis. Minnesota S5402
. row.'t. LEFEVRE.JR.
JOH% C. U1LEY / Telephone 612/338 -1177
' f RORER1 J. LI.L){LI.
JEFFREY R. BRAUCHLE
Of Counsel:
K17HERI %E M. HOLMES
•
April 17,1980 '
•
" The Honorable Chief Justice Robert Sheran
Minnesota Supreme Court
State Capitol
• St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 •
•
The Honorable Justice Fallon Kelly
Minnesota Supreme Court
State Capitol
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
•
Re: Metropolitan Waste Control Commission v. City of Shakopee and
the County of Scott, Court File No. 50269, Our File #MW135-027
The City of Shakopee v. John R. Clark and the Metropolitan
• Waste .Control Commission, Court File No. 50171, Our File
#MW135 -005
Dear Sirs:
•
As attorneys for the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission in the
above- entitled matters which are presently pending. before the
Court, we wish to bring to the Court's attention recent legislation
which effects these matters.
•
The legislation we refer to is Laws 1980, Ch. 564, which enacts the
Waste Management Act of 1980 and amendments to certain other stat-
utes. While the primary focus of the legislation is solid and •
hazardous waste, 'certain portions deal with the MWCC and resolve
• many of the questions raised by the case of MWCC v. Shakopee and
County of Scott ( #50269) .
The most important aspect of the legislation with regard to that • .
litigation is revision of the definitions of "solid waste" and
"hazardous waste." As you may recall, two of the central issues in
the litigation were whether sewage sludge of the MWCC constitutes
"hazardous waste" and whether sewage sludge of the MWCC constitutes
"solid waste." The 1980 legislation answers both of those ques-
tions in the negative. Laws 1980, Ch. 564, Art. XI, Sec. 3, amends
Minnesota Statutes, 1978, Section 116.06, Subdivision 10, to pro-
vide that "Solid waste . . . does not include . . . sewage
sludge... ... Similarly, Laws 1980, Ch. 564, Art. XI, Sec. 4,
•
The Honorable Chief Justice Robert Sheran
The Honorable Justice Fallon Kelly
April 17, 1980
Page 2
amends Minnesota Statutes 1978, Section 116.06, Subdivision 13, the
definition of "hazardous waste," to provide that, "Hazardous
waste . . . does not include sewage sludge . . . ." Laws 1980, Ch.
564, Art. XIII, Sec. 2, goes on to repeal Minnesota Statutes 1978, .
• Section 473.121, Subdivisions 27 to 31c and Laws 1980, Ch. 564,
Art. X, Sec. 1, further provides that Minnesota Statutes 1978,
Section 473.121 is amended to add a Subdivision 36 which provides
that the definitions of terms relating to waste in chapter 116 also
apply to chapter 473. Thus, the definitional issues related to
solid and hazardous waste in the declaratory judgment action appear
to be moot.
The further issue of whether a sludge farm owned and operated by
the MWCC is subject to local zoning is also dealt with by the 1980
legislation. Laws 1980, Ch. 564, Art. X, Sec. 3, amends Minnesota
Statutes 1978 to add Section 473.153 which•sets forth a process to
site an MWCC sewage sludge disposal facility. Laws 1980, Ch. 564,
Art. X, Sec. 5, goes on to amend Minnesota Statutes 1978, Section
473.516, to add a Subdivision 3 which provides that counties and
local units of government may regulate MWCC sludge disposal facili-
ties but only to the extent approved by the Metropolitan Council
and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Thus, the issue of whether
MWCC use of the Scottland site must be in compliance with local
zoning also appears moot.
•
The two remaining issues in the declaratory judgment action, how-
ever, are not, in our opinion, mooted by the 1980 legislation. The
first, the question of whether the proposed sludge farm constitutes
an agricultural use, is not dealt with by the legislation. While
the new legislation substantially restricts the ability•ot local
government to 'regulate an MWCC sludge farm, the MWCC still desires
to know whether such a sludge farm must be treated as an agricul-
tural use for zoning purposes. With regard to the final issue of
whether the MWCC's proposed wastewater plant improvements at the
Blue Lake Plant are subject to local zoning, the new legislation is
also silent. The 1980 legislation deals only with disposal of
sewage sludge and not at all with the wastewater treatment process.
The MWCC still desires and intends to construct the Phase III •
improvements at Blue Lake and requests that the Court determine
whether such improvements are exempt from local regulation by
either the superior sovereign or balancing of interests tests of
Oronoco.
Finally, we wish to comment on the condemnation litigation, Sha-
kopee v. Clark and MWCC ( #50171). The 1980 legislation does not
directly deal with that litigation but it does deal with the timing
•
•
•
•
The Honorable Chief Justice Robert Sheran
The Honorable Justice Fallon Kelly
April 17, 1980
' Page 3
of any use of the Scottland site for landspreading of sewage sludge
which is relevant to the application of the prior public use doc-
trine. The new Section 473.153 sets forth a scheme whereby the
• Metropolitan Council will site at least one sewage sludge disposal
facility by October 1982, at the latest. The Scottland site may
well be selected by the Council since, as provided by Section
473.153, subd. 2, "no land shall be excluded from consideration for
candidacy except land determined by the agency to be intrinsically
unsuitable." 'Therefore, the condemnation case is not, in our
opinion, moot.
•
Moreover, it is likely that the Scottland site will be used for
landspreading of sewage sludge in the immediate future, whether or
not it is selected in 1982 as a permanent sludge disposal facility
for Blue Lake. Section 473.153, subd. 7, specifically provides .
that the MWCC may use any site which it owns for the purpose of
interim landspreading sewage sludge to the same extent that sludge
• may be applied on private land. This:essential element of the
legislative compromise was reached because of the MWCC's interim
. need to dispose of sludge from the Blue Lake and Metro (Pig's Eye)
Plants during the period prior to completion of construction at
• those plants. Thus, given the likelihood of the Commission's use
of Scottland site for interim landspreading in the very near
future, the reasons for denying Shakopee's condemnation petition
are still applicable and, if anything, stronger than ever.
Post -trial facts are not part of the record before the Court and we
do not raise these matters for the purpose of rearguing the merits
of both cases which have been fully submitted by briefs . and oral
arguments. The purpose of this letter is only to advise the Court
concerning events which raise obvious mootness questions.
• Sincere�y,.� �•,
{
avid L. Graven
DLG:LMW:mw
cc: Phillip Krass R. Kathleen Morris
John T. Hoeft Richard. J. Schieffer
Peter D. Bergstrom William G. Peterson
Robert C. Moilanen Julius A. Coller II
Richard J. Dougherty Salisbury Adams
c
•
CITY 1 F HAK PEE
a � �� y`,N
INCORPORATED 1070 �`�ts"
129 E. First Ave., Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Shako 0
(G12) 445 -365 1
April 30, 1980
The Honorable Rudolph E. Boschwitz
2109 Dirksen Senate Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
•
Dear Rudy:
The purpose of this letter is to request your support for
continuation and increased funding for revenue sharing. As you are
aware, funding for revenue sharing has not increased since 1976,
and inflation since that time has severely eroded the value of
revenue sharing. It is my understanding that the budget resolution
currently before Congress does not include increased funding for
revenue sharing and, therefore, I am concerned that you take an
active part in assuring the cities some growth in this most vital
revenue resource.
Although the City of Shakopee has in the past taken advantage
of many federal programs which have allocated needed resources, it
is my feeling that the General Revenue Sharing Program is the best
program which has been made available to us. This Program allows
the City of Shakopee to determine local needs on a local level with-
out the excessive requirements of applications for grant reporting
which are associated with most other federal programs. It is for
this reason that we are requesting your help in the continual
expansion of this program which we think is one of the best federal
programs for providi'ng assistance to local governments.
It is my understanding that the Carter Administration has
proposed several changes in the formula by which revenue sharing funds
are allocated among local governments. We have reviewed these
specific changes and have found that they do not adversely affect
the City of Shakopee, therefore, we would not oppose these changes
I appreciate your attention to this letter. Please let us know
if you need any further information concerning the specific affects
of the revenue sharing legislation on the City of Shakopee and we
will be happy to provide this for you.
Sincerely,
Walt C. Harbeck
Mayor - City of Shakopee
DSR /jiw
The Heart of Pro q re s s Val le y
An Equal Opportunity Employer _
•
m111111112
LIZJ league of minnesota cities.
April 21, 1980
TO: City Offic . s
I�
FROM: Don Slater 1/4 � 1 � � •
RE: Federal Revenue Sharing - Proposed Formula Changes
The Carter administration has proposed several changes in the formula by
which revenue sharing funds are allocated among local governmenta. The
specific changes proposed are as follows:
A
1. Under the current formula, no local unit can receive a
per capita distribution greater than 145% of the
average per capita amount for the state. The adminis-
tration proposes to raise this to 175 %.
2. Currently no local unit can receive a per capita
distribution less than 20% of the average per capita
amount for the state. The administration proposal
would lower this to 10 %.
3. Currently, revenue sharing cannot comprise more than
50% of a local unit's budget. The administration's
proposal would lower this to 25 %.
4. The administration proposes to reduce each recipient's
tax effort factor by 1% for each percentage point by
which its per capita income exceeds 115% of the state
average. (The state per capita income is $4,825. Thus
this provision would affect units with a PCI of $5,549
or more.)
5. The administration proposes to reduce each recipient's
tax effort factor such that it cannot count more than
the equivalent of 250% of the state average for similar
governments of taxes collected per capita.
In addition to these formula changes, the administration also proposes to
add $500 million to the local government share, which is currently $6 billion.
The $500 million would be available for two years and is supposed to cushion
the effect of other budget cuts.
300 hanover building, 480 cedar street, saint paul, minnesota 65101 C6123 222 -2861
-2-
The accompanying memorandum shows what the effect of these proposed formula
changes would be if funding were to continue at current levels. As you will
note, the changes would result in substantial redistributions of funds in
some cases. The redistributions appear largely to result from proposals 4
and 5, above. Of course, the proposed $500 million added funding could
offset some of the losses to those cities whose allocations would be reduced
by the proposed formula changes.
Both the League of Minnesota Cities and the National League of Cities
officially support increased funding for revenue sharing. Funding for
revenue sharing has not increased since 1976, and inflation since that
time has severely eroded the value of revenue sharing. The budget reso-
lution currently before Congress does not include increased funding for
revenue sharing. City officials are urged to contact the Minnesota
Congressional delegation, and in particular, Senator Boschwitz, who serves
on the budget subcommittee, to request their support for increased funding
for revenue sharing. You may also wish to take this opportunity to comment
on the administration's proposals for amending the distribution formula.
If you have any questions or comments concerning these revenue sharing
proposals, please contact Pete Tritz at the League office.
DS:rmm
Afie.
#14
4?;\,
IIII 1
0 0, ,els
1111
league of minnesota c •
EFFECT OF THE ADMINISTRATION'S PROPOSED FORMULA CHANGES
The Treasury Department has calculated the changes in distribution which would
result from these formula changes. These calculations were made using the EP1O
data elements, and without including the proposed $500 million increase in the
funding level.
As you know, revenue sharing allocations among the local units of state are
calculated in a two -step process: An allocation is first calculated for each
county area. That allocation is then divided up among the local units. The
allocations among county areas, and among local units in each county area are
both made according to a formula of "Population X General Tax Effort Factor X
Relative Income Factor" within the constraints described above.
The "General Tax Effort Factor" (GTEF) is equal to the unit's total taxes
divided by the total personal income within the unit. The "Relative Income
Factor" (RIF) is equal to the state average per capita income (PCI) divided
by the local PCI.
Enclosed with this memo are two tables: One shows the amounts which would be
allocated to each county area under the proposed formula, compared with the
current formula. The other shows the distribution among the local units of
your county.
The tables show the following information, from left to right: Unit Name;
EP1O allocation in dollars; EP1O allocation as a per capita amount; dollar
allocation under the proposed formula; per capita allocation under the pro-
posed formula; the difference in dollars; the percent difference; the rela-
tive income factor; population; per capita income; and general tax effort
factor.
PT:rmm
Enc.
4/21/80
300 hanover building, 480 cedar street, saint paul, minnesota 55101 C6123222-2861
COUNTY AREA ALLOCATIONS
EP10 FINAL PERCAP 'TRIAL PERCAP
COUNTY AMOUNT GRANT AMOUNT GRANT DIFFERENCE CHANGE RIF POP PCI GTEF
Aitki.n 417,402 32.56 423,116 33.01 5,714 .1:4. 1.449819710 .12,818 3328 .020546129
Anoka 3,117,517 16.11 3,216,237 16.62 98,720 3.2 1.044146290 193,462 4621 .010475879
Becker 682,632 24.87 680,946 24.81 1,686- .2- 1.420370920 27,444 3397 .015301060
Beltrami 719,308 23.92 717,494 23.86 1,814- .3- 1.408347930 30,076 3426 .014082208
Benton 526,609 23.44 522,912 23.28 3,697- .7- 1.264744430 22,464 3815 .012516534
Big Stone 241,194 31.06 246,112 31.69 4,918 2.0 1.184339720 7,766 4074 .019551477
Blue Earth. 1,394,655 27.03 1,421,239 27.55 26,584 1.9 1.028565340 51,592 4691 .015947888
Brown ' "i ` 694,076 23.20 707,034 23 ;63 12,958 1.9 1.177690990 29,923 4097 .013509298
Carlton 819,255 28.13" 837,664 28.76 18,409 2.2 1.198460010 29,128 4026 .017828558
Carver 796,691 23.55 802,865 23.74 6,174 .8 1.056260950 33,824 4568 .018371407
-, Cass 687,485 34.19 802,815 39.93 115,330 16.8 1.524486570 20,105 3165 .024979615
.Chippewa 467,699 29.93 480,350 30.74 12,651 2.7 1.204443330 15,625 4006 .019456847
Chisago 616,723 27.17 629,696 27.74 12,973 2.1 1.240678840 22,700 3889 .018564130
Clay 805,070 17.16 823,561 17.55 18,491 2.3 1.096092690 46,928 4402 .009824407
Clearwater 306,290 34.52 336,263 37.90 29,973 9.8 1.637813990 8,873 2946 .022575065
Cook 70,640 17.17 70,995 17.26 355 .5 1.006046710 4,113 4796 .018574316
Cottonwood 339,377 22.38 345,957 22.81 6,580 1.9 1.105637030 15,167 4364 .014953575
Crow Wing 1,046,275 26.53 1,070,828 27.15 24,553 2.3 1.311141300 39,440 3680 .016026160
Dakota 2,668,109 14.86 2,738,652 15.25 70,543 2.6 0.888909360 179,544 5428 .009981124
Dodge 346,798 25.66 356,179 26.35 9,381 2.7 1.214447520 13,515 3973 .015104341
Douglas 673,903 26.80 687,098 27.32 13,195 2.0 1.336935440 25,147 3609 .014623033
Faribault 471,818 23.50 485,756 24.19 13,938 3.0 1.081353650 20,081 4462 .015998898
Fillmore 705,464 32.11 731,871 33.31 26,407 3.7 1.367242840 21,971 3529 .014675003
Freeborn 918,251 24.97 930,631 25.30 12,380 1.3 1.135561310 36,778 4249 .014248781
Goodhue 1,188,905 31.15 1,233,965 32.33 45,060 3.8 1.091135230 38,165 4422 .013765066
Grant 150,571 20.01 149,839 19.91 732- .5- 1.083052750 7,526 4455 .015287788
Hennepin 20,406,847 22.21 18,763,293 20.42 1,643,554- 8.1- 0.793716070 918,948 6079 .014830175
Houston 332,430 18.46 338,319 18.79 5,889 1.8 1.146080760 18,010 4210 .012117219
.Hubbard 440,287 35.14 447,097 35.68 6,810 1.5 1.472832720 12,531 3276 .025206864
Isanti 392,050 19.18 369,893 18.09 22,157- 5.7- 1.264081740 20,443 3817 .013359625
Itasca 1,408,580 34.94 1,499,336 37.20 90,756 6.4 1.187253940. 40,309 4064 .026409056.
Jackson 333,680 22.82 342,414 23.41 8,734 2.6 1.115091290 14,624 4327 .016420718
Kanabec 297,993 26.18 290,140 25.49 7,853- 2.6- 1.338047700 11,382 3606 .017192153
Kandiyohi 753,304 22.87 761,729 23.12 8,425 1.1 1.131832040 32,943 4263 .016461134
Kittson 182,716 26.61 187,581 27.32 4,865 2.7 1.007517230 6,867 4789 .021621287
Koochiching 463,564 26.51 480,235 27.46 16,671 3.6 1.125233210 17,487 4288 .019206845
Lac Qui Parle 292,673 26.20 301,448 26.99 8,775 3.0 1.255856320 11,169 3842 .016754166
Lake 204,185 14.85 203,007 14.77 1,178- .6- 1.050511650 13,746 4593 .011679379
,, Lk. of the Wds. :125,708 30.92 129,707 31:91 . 3,999 3.2 1.404249130 4,065 3496 .025171221
LeSueur 579,630 25.72 579,543 25.72 87- 1.151826210 22,537 4189 .017907773
,
-2-
EP10 FINAL PERCAP : TRIAL PERCAP
•
%
COUNTY AMOUNT GRANT AMOUNT GRANT DIFFERENCE CHANGE RIF POP PCI GTEF
Lincoln 281,928 33.78 336,638 40.33 54,710 19.4 1.687062940 8,347 2860 .022854323
Lyon 634,253 25.43 646,134 25.90 11,881 1.9 1.250648000 24,946 3858 .013633139
McLeod 577,870 19.99 575,291 19.90 2,579- .4- 1.093360530 28,914 4413 .011058533
Mahnomen 196,327 34.64 229,693 40.53 33,366 17.0 1.570126910 5,667 3073 .025801491
Marshall 285,529 21.41 282,874 21.21 2,655- .9- 1.170548280 13,337 4122 .015567044
Martin 510,519 20.51 522,487 20.99 11,968 2.3 1.004580470 24,889 4803 .014453823
Meeker 487,640 23.99 501,988 24.70 14,348 2.9 1.285980810 20,324 3752 .013794729
Mille Lacs 470,544 25.87 466,661 25.65 3,883- .8- 1.419117650 18,190 3400 .015610209
Morrison 798,586 28.49 _. 809,284 28.88 10,698 1.3 1.437295200 28,027 3357 .016373728
Mower 954,622 22.10 972,200 22.51 17,578 1.8 1.054875380 43,196 4574 .013486376
Nicollet 403,521 16.39 409,380 16.63 5,859 1.5 1.082323910 24,618 4458 .010635594
Nobles 541,863 23.51 555,517 24.10 13,654 2.5 1.125495680 23,052 4287 .016488437
Norman 317,929 33.49 323,338 34.06 5,409 1.7 1.265739770 9,494 3812 .026056386
Olmsted 1,618,007 18.00 1,631,233 18.15 13,226 .8 0.913825760 89,872 5280 .010978488
Ottertail 1,236,877 25.24 1,253,174 25.58 16,297 1.3 1.331034480 48,996 3625 .012867302
Pennington 315,365 21.51 316,044 21.55 679 .2 1.118451550 14,663 4314 .015919835
Pine 580,754 30.81 584,389 31.00 3,635 .6 1.422884100 18,852 3391 .020258738
Pipestone 330,981 27.95 .339,187 28.64 8,206 2.5 1.279840850 11,842 3770 .017311019
Polk 788,380 22.13 802,105 22.51 13,725 1.7 1.063009470 35,626 4539 .014406881
Pope 187,743 16.49 180,432 15.84 7,311- 3.9- 1.042566980 11,388 4628 .011349154
Ramsey 10,966,058 23.80 11,316,944 24.56 350,886 3.2 0.878870670 460,813 5490 .015546897
Red Lake 179,105 33.76 195,827 36.91 16,722 9.3 1.419952910 5,305 3398 .021370835
Redwood 492,017 24.97 505,631 25.67 13,614 2.8 1.217511990 19,701 3963 .015332642
Renville 502,156 23.88 514,495 24.47 12,339 2.5 1.234962890 21,028 3907 .015442997
`Rice 914,323 21.13 924,679 21.37 10,356 1.1 1.166304090 43,265 4137 .012490612
Roseau 298,278 24.09 299,898 24.22 1,620 .5 1.408347930 12,381 3426 .016061251
St: Louis 5,794,442 26.36 5,919,601 26.93 125,159 2.2 1.016645600 219,816 4746 .017665190
:Scott 743,504 18.22 734,889 18.01 8,615- 1.2- 1.065356590 40,810 4529 .012442157
Sherburne 589,463 21.83 578,802 21.43 10,661- 1.8- 1.199055670 27,003 4024 .014744008
Sibley 373;546 23.76 381,952 24.30 8,406 2.3 1.194898460 15,721 4038 .015886796
Stearns 2,683,751 25.72 2,714,549 26.01 30,798 1.1 , 1.353815940 104,347 3564 .010708898
Steele 525,001 18.11 532,363 18.36 7,362 1.4 1.065591870 28,996 4528 .011796673
Stevens 258,237 22.94 261,143 23.20 2,906 1.1 1.104624540 11,256 4368 .015313200
Swift 399,988 30.23 408,857 30.90 8,869 2.2 1.281200210 13,233 3766 .018217564
Todd 672,283 28.41 685,691 28.98 13,408 2.0 1.635593220 23,663 2950 .012678522
Traverse 101,454 16.71 99,812 16.44 1,642- 1.6- 0.952992300 6,073 5063 .01452f3126
Wabasha 417,297 22.35 425,235 22.77 7,938 1.9 1.219050030 18,673 3958 .014354289
Wadena 361,978 .26.85 361,471 2 507- .1- 1.487361280 13,484 3244 .016564615
Waseca 381,583 21.72 384,035 21.86 2,452 .6 1.017288640 17,570 4743 .016120068
-3-
t
EP10 FINAL PERCAP TRIAL PERCAP %
COUNTY AMOUNT GRANT AMOUNT GRANT DIFFERENCE CHANGE RIF POP PCI GTEF
Washington 1,985,232 18.38 2,025,962 18.76 40,730 2.1 0.989946660 108,004 4874 .013570084
Watonwan 343,249 27.28 352,396 28.01 9,147' 2.7 1.168846900 12,581 4128 .018713639
Wilkin 201,201 22.66 202,137 22.77 936 .5 1.043694570 8,878 4623 .018661796
Winona 1,283,795 27.99 1,318,323 28.75 34,528 2.7 1.249676250 45,860 3861 .013450031
Wright 1,407,928 27.94 1,437,914 28.54 29,986 2.1 1.273759240 50,390 3788 .018627713
Yel. Medicine 356,682 25.04 364,779 25.61 8,097 2.3 1.227735370 14,241 3930 .015655064
Murray 259,555 21.43 263,245 21.73 3,690 1.4 1.160413660 12,114 4158 .014851138
Rock 223,164 19.68 228,382 20.14 5,218 2.3 1.159298410 11,339 4162 .013553326
•
•
. .
. . .
U7-,...1.(... :161PA1 IC,IV SHARING
.
17:C0:37 . .
NeRMAL ALLOCATION IRIAL AI LO. .10N
• .
. CP10 r1NAL PiRCAP TRIAL Lr1 P•iRCAP % . .
:::0v1 caDE rAw.:.' Ar.00NI GRANT Amo8NT GRANT DIFFLRENCE CHNGE RIF POP PCI 61E1 .. '
•
24 01t:3 riAlni 10 . 3,777 1.60 2, . 2.91 1,336 36.7- 1.300371040 021 370.1 .0031101.485
711.).0.8)2 11!,01A1 . 1..10 3.702 •.60 1,001 7.30 1,601- 50.0- 1.121549550 . 000 4031 .00:“.....).•1n4
2.: 1.'.• ,1 003 ( 1 :,. •, 1.' 1...: • 7 , G•17 •1.110 ' :1,511 2.30 ),523 . 50.0 1.1727004'10 1.5.37 31102 . 0014r, , i1.17
• *.43;. (.1:! • ' 1.1k 10 0.000 3.00 4, . 2.30 4,000- 50.0- 1.7051M800 1,729 3700 .00193(407
40.1,1.•■07 1!*. ■ 111A 11"':'1.10 :' .0 , ` '1.1,0 ..1,1'75 2.30 3,776- 50,0- 1.200477050 1.12 3515 . 0018Q
7.110,00181 i!Al 1 '.011 0 ....i.1.111 10,0:■51 4.60 01114 2.30 5,11t4- 50.0- .959910050 7,100 4718 .0000i05 . .
0.,•,oct 1.89 10'..:1.1 3,207 1.00 - 1,078 2.30 1,629- 50.0- 1.401765400 700 .1030 .00
1 Ic...q.4 5,180 1.00 3,509 3.12 1,071- 32.3- 1.481517830 1,126 3057 .00J1154532
' ' : . . • I 1 i , ..1 Lv.11,! IOW 2.251 4.60 • ,179 2.30 1,t.30 50.0- 1.020016850 491 4403 .001(J'
'....(:..0v1.:. ' '.v.;. :Milk 11) • 7.750 - 4.60 2,075 2.30 3,625- 50.0- 1.352747010 1,570 3340 .001172013
2430'4:013 c.1"011, 'APE 100 13.101 4.60 0,5 ' 2.30 6,596 50.0- .813007750 2.00(3 5561 •0005610./
7 81LIF P1(111! 11(3 29,200 15.31 40,400 16.15 1,600 4.1 1.004775000 2,484 •139 .0100.0';500
21!070002 111:0 Vlit.fv2'. 2,0 11.18 7,183 11,75 . (35 4.1 1.079361300 148 4196 .0145,.1001 • .
2 ,10:.A3 ..11% . 23.32!; 10.11 74,775 10.53 950 4.1 . 0i12.2 I (..1.10 2,306 1611 .011129078
2 4. '0 7 0 004 (31.1 L'53 1 3 v111 7,624 9.63 2 10.73 107 4.1 1.760500540 708 3503 .00803.
74: •005070 HIW PR0L CIIY 21,730 10.07 - 22,095 11.11 . 805 4.1 1.135656970 ' 1.930 3980 .01042080S
2 :701(100.., PRIM 1.1-.1%T. VI 3.3, 30.100 5.66 30,7139 5.71 301 1.0 .705070140 5,380 5092 .0070
7,70.0007 5A, ( 11 70,119 7.03 27,1114 7.32 1,005 4.1 .873810750 3.710 '3103 .00002/40
71'.'o(0011 , .0A1",111 1 117 9 10.39 (01.105 10.81 2,959 • 4.1 .992548760 9.350 4563 .011617/67
Sc 0 • 10.!t:ie . , 713,504 13.77 721,389 18.01 11,015- - 1.2- 40,010
7•1...',107i :,111tY' •.::1 . 1 304,:'00 14.60 . .-14,010 . 3.7 1.190050370 27.003 4024 .011744000
....;w01 1...0: ::, .1;.:3 9.!:90 .1.00 4, 2.30 . : 4, t4.0- 1.060575310 - 7-151 3773 .001711L.99
• .. 011Lli: ").'.8.111P 0,403 4.1;0 5 . 7 " 7 4 • 16 :' 610 •': (3 .6- 1.3710:1' 1110 : . 397 ) .3.0 1.0.7Y.i 1
. .
7 i 10113 81 (,,1,1 10..41',11 9,200 4.60 7,110 ' 3.50 .:' : 72.7- .000650580 ' 2,000 45111 .004814;41
1: ' 910: 0:11 i9....4.; 3.772 4.00 1,686 7.30 '. ,-% 1,1186 ' 50.0 1.173519980 :0)0 3429 .0007(.0.511
1405 ,A 1.,%,.1. 10...g1 1 .3.1 1 4 1.81 : 5.303 ' 5.12 - 109 ,. 3.7 1.7.6:,597370 1,036 3720 .00101 ".7113
21(1. .3007 0A'11:1 10. . 6,101 1.60 ! • 3,05S 2.30 - 3,054- 5:0,0 -I .964525410 . 1.376 1172 .0008:(3917
24.:0.1u60 3, '5 103..°1'.81 5,304 1.00 , . 2,000 2.50 ,, .2,410*. 45.6- 1.1607145:90 1,11:,3 3449 .00750
71. 01.1f 21 P2:044110 3,117 0.00 : ,' 2,169 3.00 .- 1,411--,., 33.6- '1.1000r 808 3055 .001345 171
21.“J.:(010 3.A.1'.' 1; If:L.:W.01P ' 5,1p6 4.00 ' 2,!,!•:1 -; 2,30' 2,5 . 50.0.7 1.055000300 1.110 3014 .007529,101
71.301101.1 SAN1100 10....4.2.9 4 . 1 30 1.60 2,068 2.30 • 2 50. 1.292770610 899 3114 ..001:11531325
242071001 1310:1 8 v13 IA(A. ' 15,3.12 33.35: '," 19,240 40.25 . 3,200 . 20.7 1,097290990 170 3661 .0551131604
747071007 016 LAIC( 0114A11 . 11.521 • 0.00 ..., 12,005: 7.13 .. 540' 4,7 1.023650100' 1.696 3931 ,007417350 .
, 242011003 C1.30 LAKU Via 5. 11.10 . .; 5.063 17.39 ' 757, - 4.0 .1,097050120 457 3666 .012020600
217073001 1.11i 8101R V1 1.1A 37,197 4.60 20,360 2.91 11,P79* 36.7- .020061630 6.999 4849 .003734170
74701801 7.1 (3 LA 3,717 ' 4.50 • 1,70 4.43 1 3.7 .991316700 0011 4047 :004742400
747372021071 Sr L1,900 C1 1Y 01,661 21.12 • 85,511 22.12 3.877 4.7 1,07303.9270 3,067 3740 ,021940007 .
' 5 cOTHY MIA': ' 5119,401 ?1.01 570,002 41.13 1Q,00i- . 1.0 27,003
. 2410/2077 - 510117 1 :00017 ' 237,707 15.12 2 . 15 ' 60 0, 3.7 1.194890460 15,721 4038 ,9151106798
2430/7001 Al r%0000 10...:101 2,341 4.00 1,015 3.57 526* 22.5- 1,0871123280 509 3712 . A010.1 9 417
713072002 A81196100 ION Ns 3,022 1.6o 2, 4.45 96 3.2- .993846910 657 4063 .00553(.044
2430::0 01 ((3 '511 2,102 4.00 2,044 4.47 38 2.1.1-! 1.151111 . 4 57 307 .00170
24'3072001 6„0891'111 11!W9',1 1.965 1.70 2,0.'7 •.4.87 72 3.7 . 1.057601.5670 410 1617 .0050
'4 OP"10. 301:8.1118 • 2.311 4.60 . 1.46? 2.88 874- 37,3- .798022720 009 5060 .004167753
2430:2005 rA.t3'! 18re.N5010 2,653 - 0.00 • 2,751 0.39 98 3.7 1.402003330 328 7600 .007390117
2.107007 68/0 1 00 T0WW3111 2,2a6 '1.69 2,339 4.86 133 3,7 .908640000 481 4444 ,000610796 '
243077000 GRUN ISLE IOUN 3,755 6.213 • 3,094. ' q.51 139 . 3.7 1.205000040 • 508 3118 .006211
•
. .
• • • .
• .
• ' •
. . • .
. • .
. . .
. .
• .
• . . .
• .
• .
. . _ .
• . .
. . .
. . . , . .
. •
. .
• - •
•
. •
' .
• .
. . '
' • .
. ' •
. • .
•
. . .
! .
• .
LGI4VP610 66Sv 0111'0V 00S9SCS90'1 L'C Ovu ei:i'Oi i.;L'Gli CG*01 SO6'66i . i in is 0400401V6
66
. CC '11S CS'Ll C10'1 • . 06'91 f.ISS'i 3N1 1:1,0fl1196 16104.09Vd •
•
.
.
910'616 6'6 6c1I Sd1 C6'9r. 10::'616'q 9C'9d. at't.i.:L'G ' P. AINHOA , 5i .-...;
6SOL16V00' VGVP S099 0 G'C V.L0 9L' V ci,::.1' i C 09'1. eG - Air, 11 POI1 111 106
60SSLIVO0 . 066C 9Ld 01161916/.91'1 -0'Z -9d IS'17 Vvel 00'v OL4'I 1v11lA N6i1.1M Ld0h1.0dV6
4C4V1GL9i0' 999S 0(:/.' 11 096L69LC8 ' . C't LV6 SL'Zi CC61,1 09'61 91.1S'LVI VINI:.MA oe,o,t:Oeve.
9LGL6hS00' OVGV 91L OSVVLESPO'I r 6•C 9SI 04'S 1•th'.'1, (iV'S 111J0 1, Air) d.iM01 S606.
1.4.1619PS00' O1,01, 091 - 00V6GLVLI'1 , O'C 1 CO'S VLv I9'S 06/. /.1 '.49v111A m0 M001 1,606s0e.ve.
0vCIOG900' 60tt! OGC 000lda166' ' ire ZO 169 6146 06'S ' OC1'd TIV111A Min 1,0,..:v4
1016G1900' S911V 9(.•,L 04q6CSS!..6* O'C. 0S4 i)t.' 1o...0e. 94.., Sv4'6I ! 9 01.111 11P/11.1100 e.c.oto.oet.4
061.L611 VSSv toi. 0 pl. 01) i pip • 1 • 6 • C VC : 19'S V06. ()V'', 0/1. 1:iN '..01tviri.jyttl h:0-.!06v6
S/1'199910' 6Coc iv, 0 . .O'C 601 /. 61 960S - 60'61 LOp'v 9V111A AlikiAlN 0e.ow.0cv4
oe.vilic.0 ' vOGP 6s1 0400CLVSO'I O'C Cd1 1606 S6C'C 1,1 3: 4:06 . .!119 '0vOINo11 hilthoOdv6 . .
c..J.V.v11.1160' 010I'/.iv OSIIVSVIIt'l O'C ';Ii SV'OC Vlh'CI . 6C*6d 661 1!,v111A !'iNt;Im 0 t 0,.9C.dv6.
19941:C100' OLLV CC' Ov960C166* -0'0S -90c • OE'd Jul: 091 619 A Ni.11,nni• ,181 L t 06 1.),:ve .
9LhoV1010' CPUP 6•CE 0601/.66.%6' WC wie..1 16'6 0.C.'VC LU•ll Geo'cc 111A , v. , 1 ' 9106-0,vd
. .
k..:S000Z010' MG W.191 OV0c,099110* trC (7.06'V , 6611 Col1:1 , 16. 11,S'L41 39v :11p. Idtt'..fln St01.:v4
, LV4010000' L11V 940'6 01.1.1vVVVt't 13 I:i1.0 • VC 'H 111:46. C0 1' 901' 1. , I1) 1 tl1'!110 11 city.-6,".t.'„ •
.
- ,141196C0' VOCv 9V 0v1cv0101'1 S'bt vcd 91161 , ,WV'l OC'CC 1(■d'I 9v1111. HIrdlIVH1 610
6"60,k01100 00CC 6[9 010dvtV0v'1 • 11'C 9Vi: CC'01 (“: '9 Wk. .l '1 V11 1A 000!. liot,Sudd
61 Bk:10 11/..P OUHE1;H00) * WC 9 t r.' 1 06•9 I, 64'9 1 )11.1 111 111A1 010.
• t„v1V`vd000• vi.Vt! 196'v 0L!,64090 't WE ' V(1 609 V.;:1 GU• Uta.'11.'. !11:) 1,11
04v:' 6I61' VeO'V6 O,'.6:0196' ti'V. 010'99 V0•61 Lv9'09 1 !.fiCtiri,'t !11:t 1.1ni:In 9601•c):v,'.
91,401100 ' 0,!1 Vol. 04v00 -0'0S -0.-4'1 OC'd .4..!..1 - 09•1! , ii;'V. Itiv111A W.»
dvL,:.4 119v Gol'9 O1j1.OW1100 II ' C 1 011:C 1,L.01 w,l'(.01 (.1 • ;II 011 ' 0.• /.11.1 0101•',11i ) 1.101 •••,,7;•,•:
CC•i9')141o* Sriv 9ot:'t 0.,hkU.:C.60'1 O'C 1191 V0 'L.1 04.: Ov'o1 i.: 1 1,tn.i •',
vO:WL0d00' 40t' 061 0dh0,91691'I -005 - ..1!.4 . OC'd 9Ld 09'v .1'.':., V1Air. tittp., Ilitit •1041•..:
• ' 60v0dP1100' VVSV C81.'1 0C4VSVPV0'1 ll'e 0CP 66'L 6v1'11 69'L 11P'11 !IV:: 411...y.10 coow.06vc
GCLeCoow CLSV 46o OG%ocoLco'l -o'oG -9 OC'd E 09'1' VCC'Ct 111V 11A iiIchvO e006 odv6
SCLVq1,400' PULV 661.6 0909S0666' O'C vh9 6L'9 L 41!" C1tC01 .,t' 111!. W:0..;;Iv 1606..0dv6
61'/.'.'.i ..'t() ZVLC 016 06/G0E096'1 L'C LPI 00•01 9, Q 41 • 111 1(.0, • I• . 0 •cq;;:i, ; Iii9 100...:1
• ...ant. q000' 0909 Pm 0,:hS.10ZOL' '-0'09 -C11 OC'd Cit'l 09 0,'•d'6. dliv,::7111 1
Vod 16PC 1)1.1 . 0!,111,ti165C*1 -L'OC -'.)Ii . 606 b10 09'v c-i'11 1 • i111A vollIm. 41.06.11,1.6 '
v0:0' 00Pv 6i:o'v 0LL04991.0'1 L'C 6,'.6 OC'S 0:o II 'S 9.'!'P6 • 119.....iti ;I inm 140ht•Ot: 1.6
VL401 CCCV 6LP OdLII1,9L60'1 -0'0S -Sd0'1 OC'6 lit 09'1 Itl'e .: iliti: y ,..*:;.1 0/.00
Ei00' iGGv I. 0C4LV06PO'l -0'0S -S,'.0 OE ' 6 o.'.0 09'v Ic.9 ' 1 0•1‘..1 No i 111 IA 690.01.)11
60E1 1E1.00' COIF 6Lt ' 06S/01 -6'1/ -VC It.' L' 1v.4 09 . i64 ra.'.'„il 111/1111 •11:h 090(.-0Cvd
09SPVL000' 6ISC LOU OvL9q115C*1 -005 -904 cp 90L • • 09'v 1741 1iv.ht.'01 VItilIni Loou...Wtd
. t.dCe!9000' , :it.1.1 Vdd . 0d4w;4L9C1 -0'0S -Sly, OC'e, •t• 09'v Ov0 iv.tr;n1 nnp :01.: W1.1“1.0,r,',
14:01. . co ,A 1,11 001EJ9110C1 cr, 0111 S0 t; hdi' II: V15 1 10 01: liv .1 ; 1 :..11 !. '.......,. ,;. 1•c:
91.11.:L000' sciv et . octi -6'6V -rot: OC*6 P9C 09'1 LUA 01 % 1'1 .. .1..11., 1" 01 l'::
bOy!L0000* UP0v 6 01601.vdLI*1 -005 •-9.• OC'd 9C.1'1 09'1 d di!' 1. . '. :I I'. 1 .1. • •.), t•i;
90 ELL' UvV 0/.9.9.1,'.00'1 -0*OG -610'1 OC'd 610' 1 091 0(') • .111:1•.:.•••.)1 . ;C.1', 0, , ,....1. t•e_
0 9 d 6 i t i 1 0 0 ' O 16 V b '1: O i (,s i C L 6 I ' l -0'0S -91'913 O 1; ' 6 9 t . •' l l 0 9 ' v 6 , d ' L i I . * . : , 1 10; 1 1)1:1 1'It9.••■1t I.
09..)6.'-cl00' 606C vv 0966:A1/.61'1 -0001 -6o4 - 60•cv d04 • 1)1 ,AvI Ilt:ivn• o•to•• :61 d
U9'6101:00' 1O6C 691 OCtItOoId't -9'S1, -V,t; 05 '6 VC!. 09'v LLL iir.1.: C . •1.111,1 10,61- 'CO :.e. •
6C1 9LCV 0hC 0016Y11.00'I -0'01 -911. OC'd !it'. 09't 1c0'1 .1 :iv t..•4111. .11,1 ..:1 • 1: Pe.
99E164100' PdLC 41 06091.VVL6'1 • a It‘•..;:.7 11 .:1".' 1 /.•.,:• 1,..1 t•c'.
• . .
i•lt) 13d dOit . .119 30N113 331110:1J310 INVO9 11.0nWV .111Vfl't 1N1101';V :;/.:1 J01,1 ii■nr., .
• dVDtriJ 60 1V1111 dV)211 1VNIJ 01
• .
' . .
NO1' ''011V 1V19.1. 901.01301 1111,WIGN •
ON1N D9N1Ali :'..wprpN • (1:1 -o-,..;
. • • .•
. . .
REMINDER: May'22, 1980 Annual Meeting of the AMM
More information will be forth coming!
6,. 1111 Itll
IIli . IIII
Ui league of minnesota cities
April 29, 1980
TO: All Members (c /o Mayors, Managers, Clerks)
SUBJECT: 1981 Nominations for Board of Directors
We, the Nominating Committee would like to request your advice in proposing candidates
for the Board of Directors for the League of Minnesota Cities.
The Board positions that expire June, 1980 are: Robert Anderson, Councilmember, Inter-
national Falls; Walter Dziedzic, Alderman, Minneapolis; Harvey Lange, Mayor, Robbinsdale;
Josephine Nunn, Mayor, Champlin.
Board member, Jerry Weyrens, Councilmember of St. Cloud has resigned effective April 15,
1980. His term would normally expire June of 1982. Therefore the Nominating Committee
will also consider nominations for the seat being vacated by Jerry Weyrens.
The officers of the League of Minnesota Cities, the President and Vice - President, are
elected annually. Those positions are now filled by: Mayor George Latimer of St. Paul
as President. Mayor Latimer assumed the presidency in January of 1980, due to the
resignation of D. J. Black, Mayor of Hutchinson. Mayor Vaughn Thorfinnson, Vice - President
assumed the vice- presidency in January, after Mayor Latimer assumed the presidency.
The Nominating Committee will work with the guidelines for Board representation, which
were developed as a result of the deliberations of past nominating committees. Those
guidelines appear on the reverse side of this letter. Enclosed, also, is a listing of
present board members and officers of the League.
The Nominating Committee has scheduled a meeting for Wednesday, May 21 and it would be
helpful to have your input. If you know of a city official who would be considered for
nomination, please give his or her name and a brief resume of qualifications to the
League staff or us. This communication can be as informal as you wish, a phone call is
all that is needed.
Our goal is to make sure that any good candidate is considered. Whether or not to let
an individual know that you are submitting his or her name, is, of course, up to you.
The Nominating Committee, however, makes it a practice to confirm the fact that an
individual is willing to serve before presenting his or her name to the Annual Conference.
(OVER)
300 hanover building, 480 cedar street, saint paul, minnesota 55101 [6123222-2861
Page 2
On behalf of the Nominating Committee, we wish to thank you in advance for your help
and to assure you that all suggestions will be seriously considered.
Sincerely,
� L
Jon Elam Josephine Nunn
City Administrator Mayor, Champlin
Walnut Grove, Sanborn, Lucan, Co- Chairman, Nominating Committee
Wabasso, Milroy
Co- Chairman, Nominating Committee
1
HMS:kgj
Enclosure
•
GUIDELINES
1. Geographic and Population Size Representation
There has been a conscious effort to see that different parts of the
state are represented on the Board, as well as the different sizes of
cities that are among the League's constituency.
2. Twin Cities Area /Outstate.Balance
While there are no specific seats on the Board reserved for Twin Cities
area or outstate members, it has been a consistent practice to maintain
a rough balance of Board members from these areas.
3. Elected /Appointed Balance
Traditionally both elected and appointed municipal officials have participated
in all aspects- of the League's activities, including membership in the Board
of Directors. Although no specific number of seats on the Board are reserved
for elected as distinct from,appointed officials, it has been a consistent
practice to have a majority of the Board composed of elected officials.
Furthermore, there has been some effort to provide an opportunity for a variety
of appointed officials (e.g., clerks, city managers, attorneys, assessors, etc.)
to serve on the Board.
4. Rotation of Membership
In view of the fact that the League has more than 750 member cities any
individual who serves a full term on the Board is not normally considered
for another Board term. However, persons with Board experience are often
considered as potential officers.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND *_E • ice
•
OFFICERS OF LEAGUE 1979 -1980 MAC 1 19
• ' Terms of Office � �� p
CMY 0 5��
President: George Latimer, Mayor, St. Paul . , .
Appointed to fill term of Black, Jan. 1980 • .
Term expires June, 1980
Vice- President: Vaughn Thorfinnson, Mayor, Red Lake Falls .
Appointed to fill term of Latimer, Jan. 1980 .
Term expires June, 1980 •
•
Directors: Robert Anderson, Councilmember International Falls '
Term expires June, 1980 .
Walter Dzidezic, Alderman, Minneapolis .
Term expires June,.1980 • .
Harvey Lange, Mayor, Robbinsdale .
Term expires June, 1980 • . . .
•
• Josephine Nunn, Mayor, Champlin . .
• Term expires June, 1980 . .
John Fedo, Mayor, Duluth
Appointed to fill term of Beaudin, Jan., 1980
•
Term expires June, 1981
Orvil Johnson, City Manager, Mendota Heights • .
Term expires June, 1981
Jom Elam, City Administrator, Wabasso, Milroy, Lucan, Sanborn,
and Walnut Grove •
• Term expires June, 1981 . , - . .
' . Kenneth Yager, Mayor, Minnetonka •
• Term expires June, 1981 . •
Sue•Edel, Councilmember, Winona •
Term expires June, 1982
Bonita Carlson; Assistant City Manager, Finance Director, Morris
Term expires June, 1982 .
•
• William Jokela, Clerk - Administrator, Sandstone
• Term expires June, 1 982
Gerald Weyrens, Councilmember, St. .Cloud .
Term expires June, 1982 .
Ex officio: David Hozza,`Councilmember, St. Paul, President of Association • ' •
of Metropolitan Municipalities, June 1979
Term expires June, 1980 ..
Vacant - LMC Immediate Past President, June 1979 '
. Term expires June, 1980 • • .
•
MEMO TO: City Council Members and Their Spouses
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Administrative Assistant
RE: Dinner Invitation
DATE: May 1, 1980
The Council and spouses are invited to attend the following
event:
The Annual Volunteers Dinner for Congregate Dining
•
at St. Mary's School, Lunch Room
Tuesday, May 13, 1980
Entertainment 3:30 - 5:00 P.M.
Dinner at 5:00 P.M.
The Senior.. Citizens would appreciate your attendance. Any time
between 3 :30 and 5:00 P.M. that you could arrive would be fine.
Please notify me at the May 6th Council meeting if you and your
spouse will be able to attend.
JA /jsc
ti
•
•
...0
r:411
� t
INCORPORATE D J9070
129 E. First Ave.,\Shal opee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445 -3650 5 , V w
•
May 1, 1980
•
The Honorable City Council
City of Shakopee
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Mayor Walter Harbeck has notified me, Douglas S. Reeder,
City Administrator of Shakopee, that a Special Meeting of the
City Council will be held at 5:00 P.M. on Tuesday, May 6, 1980,
in the Council Chambers of the City Hall for the prupose of
meeting jointly with the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission to
discuss matters of mutual concern.
If you are unable to attend at this time, please let me
know.
Sincerely, DU-gm)
•
Douglas C ��)
uglas S
City Administrator
DSR /jsc
•
The Heart of Pro Valle
An Equal Opportunity Employer