Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
September 02, 1980
TENTATIVE AGENDA REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Acting Mayor Reinke presiding. 1] Roll Call at 7:30 P.M. 2] Approval of Minutes of July 15th and July 29th, 1980 3] Communications: 4] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers: a] Cncl.Colligan from the Fire Dep't.; Jt. Seven Man Committee; and the Planning Commission b] Cncl.Hullander from Scott County Criminal Justice Advisory Comm. • c] Cncl.Lebens from the Community Services Board d] Cncl.Leroux from the Shakopee School Board e] Cncl.Reinke from the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission f] Mayor Harbeck from Scott County Board of Commissioners 5] RECOGNITION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANYONE PRESENT IN THE AUDIENCE WHO DESIRES TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA 6] Old Business: a] Proposed Building Project for League of Mn. Cities, tbld 8/19/80 7] Planning Commission Recommendations: a] PC80 -34R - Request to rezone a'20 acre parcel located S of Hwy 101 and 0.6 mi W of CR -89 from B -1 (Hwy Business) to 1 -2 (Heavy Industrial) Applicant: Howe, Inc., 4821 Xerxes Ave. No, Mpls, 55430 (for Benjamin Investment property owners) Action: Ord. No. 45 • Planning Comm. Recommendation: Approval b] PC80 -33R - Request to rezone a 20 acre parcel located S of Hwy 101 and 0.8 mi. W of CR -89 from B -1 (Hwy Business) to I -2 (Heavy Industrial) Applicant: Cretex, Inc., 311 Lowell, Elk River, Mn. 55330 Action: Ord. No. 46 Planning Comm. Recommendation: - Approval c] PC80 -18P - Final Plat of Link 2nd Add'n. (previously titled as East Shakopee 2nd Add'n.), lying between Prairie & Naumkeag and between 3rd & 4th Avenues. Applicant: Clete Link, Rt. 2, Glen Ellyn Park Action: Resolution No. Planning Comm. Recommendation: Approval w /conditions d] PC80 -26P - Final Plat of Halo 2nd Add'n., lying N. of Hwy 101 and East of Marschall Road Applicant: Wallace Bakken, Route 2, Box 258 Action: Resolution No. 1683 Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval w /conditions e] Rosenwinkle Mining Permit - discussion 8] Routine Resolutions and Ordinances: a] Res. No. 1691, Initiating the Vacation of the Public Property Within The City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota • TENTATIVE AGENDA September 2, 1980 . Page -2- b] Res. No. 1681, Ordering the 1979/1980 Diseased Shade Tree Removal Program c] Res. No. 1682, Declaring the Cost To Be Assessed & Setting A Hearing on the Proposed Assessments for the 1979/1980 Diseased Shade Tree Removal Program d] Res. No. 1686, Receiving A Report & Calling A Hearing on Improve- ment of Prairie from 3rd to 4th (80 -12) 9] New Business: t • a] 8:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Vacation of property requested by Northrup King Co. -- postponed until October 7th at 8:30 Y.M. b] 8:35 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - 1981 Revenue Sharing Fund Budget • c] 1981 General Fund Budget - discussion d] Purchase of Snow Fighting Equipment e] Lease for Riverside Park e] Rental of Eagle CreekcTown Hall f] Auditor's Management Report g] O'Dowd Lake Park Acquisition: 1) Authorize acquiring property with Fiscal Year 1980 LAWCON, LCMR, AND City matching funds 2) Res. No. 1692, Authorizing Filing of Application for Grant to Acquire and Develop Open Space Under the Provisions of the Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund Act and The State Natural Resource Fund h] Authorizing the Sale and Conveyance of Certain Land Lying North of Hwy 101 and East of Marschall Road to Wally Bakken 1) Res. No. 1693 2) Res. No. 1694 i] Res. No. 1685, Receiving eport, Ordering Improvement & Prepara- tion of Plans and Specifications - TH -101 Trunk Watermain (80 -11) j] Res. No. 1687, Ordering Report on Improvements of Halo 2nd (80 -10) k] Res. No. 1688, Receiving Report, Ordering Improvement & PreparA- tion of Plans and Specifications - Halo.2nd (80 -10) 1] Res. No. 16,89, Approving Plans & Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids - Halo 2nd (80 -10) in] Res. No. 1690, Declaring the Cost to be Assessed and Ordering the Preparation of Proposed Assessment - Halo 2nd (80 -10) 10] Consent Business: 11] Other Business: a] b] c] 12] Adjourn to Wednesday, September 10th at 7:30 P.M. Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator .UPCOMING MEETINGS: Sept. 10th - Discussion of 1981 Budget Sept. 16th - Regular Meeting and discussion of 1981 Budget Sept. - Discussion of 1981 Budget (if needed) Sept. 23rd - Council approves 1981 Budget 0 0 Metropolitan Transit C 801 American Center Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612/221 -0939 August 25, 1980 RECEIVED AUG 2 7 1980 Mayor Walter Harbeck City of Shakopee 001'x( OF SHAKOPl 129 E. First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mayor Harbeck: At this time of the year, I wish to renew my offer to meet with . your board about any or all concerns you may have in regards to transit or the operations of the Metropolitan Transit Commission. I do expect to be present at the annual fall meetings of the Metropolitan Council Chairman, Mr. Weaver. I will give a very brief review of Commission activities and be available for questions. However, feel free to ask for a separate meeting if you so desire. During my three years 'as your commissioner, I have met with most but not all cities in the transit taxing district believing that if you felt the need to discuss matters with me you would so indicate. I represent you best on the Commission when good communi— cation exists between us. Again, I welcome an invitation from you and reaffirm my willingness to work with you. With best regards, 4 rneetr.°11:191.1°"."'"'"1 G yle M. Kincannon Commissioner Precinct H GMK /kal k ti ' •.t • . 14- '"^. -'•/, ,i•q P I . -r- ,; . ■ i r vol doh .Art ? i;,�tmr eti . 3.ko 4 f ° , � ` al, rr.: . i (it ooiltoup atT b mil -ret tro :) rti t , `,il .fft) 01'zf7sb .,g J",itiri�' b ts, kt � f �, t 1 44 �1 i. Dr,?` ,,. } ,noti . 6. 1 .GI t,t.te ei aflt e: ribe�s. :III ;, r"l,'l*r e4' �; �_�$ . rrrso'�.d TIN t ixd 5b rrr coed otssrl 3r 1111 1111171 league of m,nnesc �t c hies r r L t August 29, 1980 SEP 2 1980 TO: All City Mayors, Managers,Administrators and Clerks • FROM: Donald A. Slater, Executive Director • RE: Cuts in State Aid League staff members met with Commissioner Clyde Allen and other state staff with respect to implementation of Governor Quie's proposed cut in state aid payments to cities earlier this week. Several major points of discussion emerged. These include: 1. The timing of any cut in state aid payments. 2. The issue of a revised or reduced certification in the 1981 state aid payment. 3. The state government's November, 1980 cash flow problems. , 4. The potential for cuts in other city aids from state agencies. The situation, described in previous Action Alerts, still prevails. The Governor pro- poses an 8.3% cut in state aid payments to cities and is moving to implement his decision. Legislative hearings are under way by a number of committees of the Legislature but the Governor, in spite of contrary advice from members of his party, notably Senators Ashbach and Pillsbury, will not involve the Legislature in this decision; in other words, no special session and no consideration of the problem by the Legislature in January. 1. Timing . The League Board has asked that any cut in aid payments fall totally on the March, 1981 payment.with no reduction at all in the September and November payments. Commissioner Allen indicated that the state is favorably disposed to this request and will probably go with it. Other alternatives include a 1/3 proportionate cut in the three remaining payments. Max- imum flexibility occurs if the entire cut occurs in the March 15, 1981 payment. Those cities which prefer to spread the cut over the - latter part of 1980 as well as early 1981 could adjust their 1980 budgets to do this in anticipation of the large cut in March of 1981. If the entire cut does fall on the March, 1981 aid payment, that payment would be reduced by 30.753 %. Note: That would be the only reduction required of cities to deal with the state's projected $195 million shortfall in revenues to its general fund. 2. 1981 Aid Payment Certification • Commissioner Alien has already issued a 1981 state aid payment certification. The issue is, should he revise the amount he has informed cities they will receive the proposed (OVER) , 300 hanover building, 480 cedar street, saint pawl, ntir ;nnf.,uta 55101 C612] 2< 24 861 �Q ii�i %�``Isfs -2- 8.3% cut in state aid payments to cities? In considering this g question, the League Board asked that the Commissioner not revise or ' reduce the 1981 certification. The Commissioner indicated that a decision on this point has not been made but will be soon. The League Board hoped that, without a reduction in certification of aid, the Legislature could review the situation in January and, possibly, restore Governor Quie's cut. Secondly, should the "shortfall" situation improve, the cut could be reduced. The problem is as follows: If the 1981 certified amount of aid remains as issued, then cities, particularly those up against their levy limits, would not be able to levy the taxes necessary to regain any funds which might be'cut from the March, 1981 payment. The other side of the coin is that if Commissioner Allen issues a revised 1981 state aid amount (cut.by 8.3 %), then cities, in.preparing their 1981 budgets, may.leyy_ for the_, reduced' amount, levy limits 'notwithstanding. The League Board decided to be tough on this point in order to'seek relief in the Legisla- ture. Furthermore, if the Commissioner revises (and reduces) the 1981 payment, then no restoration can be made, either by the Legislature or by the Governor if economic condi- tions improve. 3. State Cash Flow • The state will experience a severe cash.flow problem in November of 1980. Commissioner Allen has asked that the League survey cities as to whether cities could forego receiving the November 15 state aid payment until January 15. (A survey form is attached.) The state does not intend to pursue this proposal on an across- the -board basis but will accommodate individual problems in order to avoid;causing cities to issue tax anticipation notes to help the state with its cash problem. 4. Other City Aids ' The League is surveying state agencies in order to determine whether state, agencies are passing on in program by cutting pass-through funds to cities, in effect, giving cities additional cuts in aid. The survey is incomplete at the moment. Commissioner Allen agreed that he would work with the League when we were able to identify state cuts which would also affect cities. If you are aware of any other state program cuts, please inform the League at once. Thus far; we have identified agency cuts in the following programs: mass transit assistance, energy assistance, and IISAC grant.funds. Apparently, shade tree funds and dedicated highway funds are intact. We're still checking other funds. The League will protest these cuts and seek relief from what may amount to a double cut. 5. Follow -up ' City witnesses shared their problems with the cuts with the House Taxes. Committee on August 28 and others will testify at a Senate Finance Committee hearing on September 11. Please complete and return the enclosed survey to the League by September 8. DAS:kgj i `tlf ►• LOCAL AID CUT SURVEY Return to the League of Minnesota Cities 300 Hanover Building 480 Cedar Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Name of your city - Your name and title A copy of this survey is sent to the mayor, manager, administrator and clerk of every Minnesota city. However, only one survey form per city should be returned. In order to reduce the state's cash flow problem, the Commissioner of Revenue has requested the League to survey all cities as to whether your city would agree to a delay in receiving the November aid payment until January 15, 1980. If a sub- stantial number of cities agree to this delay, it will be easier for the state to cut only the March 15, 1981 aid payment instead of cutting the September 15, November 15, and March 15 payments equally. CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: Our City agrees to permit the state to defer our November 15, 1980 state aid payment until January 15, 1981, at which time it will be paid in full. Our City does not agree to any deferral of the November 15, 1980 state aid payment because we will have a severe cash flow problem at that time making it necessary for our city to issue tax anticipation notes or other obligations if the November 15 payment is deferred. Other (specify) • • Comments: • • . , , ,„,,,,,, ,,,„„, .,„.,,„„ ,,, i I 1 I ( 1111 1111, -ir ii-A league of minnesota cities August 29, 1980 TO: City Officials FROM: Pete Tritz RE: STATUS OF REVENUE SHARING RE- ENACTMENT As you know, the current revenue sharing law expires as of September 30 of this year. The bill re- enacting revenue sharing has not yet been passed by Congress. It currently appears that the earliest date by which final action can be expected is the first week of October. The revenue sharing re- enactment bill, H.R. 7112, has been reported out of com- mittee, and is currently on the floor of the House. Major features of the bill as it currently stands are as follows: 1) The bill would extend the program for three years, with annual funding of $4.6 billion. (This is the same level of annual funding which has been in effect since 1976.) . 2) State governments are eliminated from revenue sharing. 3) The allocation formula is amended to reduce funds to jurisdictions whose per capita tax collections.exceed 250% of the state average. 4) Annual use reports are eliminated, but jurisdictions receiving allocations of $25,000 or more would be required to submit an audit every two years, covering both years. 5) One billion dollars ($1,000,000,000) is authorized for counter - cyclical anti- recessionary payments. These funds would be available after two successive quarters of decline in national real wages and salaries and the gross national product.' The funds would be distri- buted to local governments in counties which suffer a decline in real wages and salaries, and would be allocated to governments within the county according to the revenue sharing allocation formula. NLC's lobbyists feel that it is unlikely that the counter - cyclical funding provisions will actually be passed. They do consider it possible that the House may include a moderate increase (perhaps $500 million) in general revenue sharing funding. It is important that local officials continue to contact Minnesota's Senators and Representatives to urge them to support re- enactment of revenue sharing. PT /cr 300 hanover building, 480 cedar street, saint paul, minnesota 55101 C6123222-2861 • DATE: August 14, 1980 °L.°. CASE: PC 80 -34R ITEM: Rezoning B -1 (Highway Business) to I -2 (Heal APPLICANT: Benjamin Investment Company LOCATION: T.H. 101 West of North Star Auto Auction ZONING /LAND USE: B -1 (Highway Business) /Vacant AREA: 20+ Acres APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 11.33; Section 11.03, Subd. 5; Section 11.04 Subd 7 FINDINGS REQUIRED: Section 11.04, Subd 71 PUBLIC HEARING CASE HEARD BY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CASE HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a rezoning from B -1 (Highway Business) to I -2 (Heavy Industrial). This zoning change will amend the Comprehensive Plan in accordance with this zoning change. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY: Surrounding land uses: North - (Agriculture) /Vacant South - (Light Industrial) /Vacant East - (Highway Business) /North Star Auto West - (Heavy Industrial) /Cretex Plant Urban Services Availability: Sanitary sewer - Service extended to Block 1 of Cretex Plat to the West Storm Sewer - None Water - Service to East end of Cretex Plat CONSIDERATIONS: 1) The Comprehensive Plan identifies the subject property for a commercial land use. Section 11.03 Subd. 5 states that "Any significant change in zoning granted by the Council shall automatically amend the Comprehensive Plan in accordance with said zoning change ". Planning Commission August 14, 1980 PC 80 -34R Page -2- -1°1' 2) This parcel was platted as part of the Cretex Industrial Park. Elk River Concrete is presently expanding its present operation to this lot. 3) At its August 5, 1980, meeting, the City Council accepted the feasibility study for a T.H. 101 frontage road from Sheily Road to County Road 89. This road would pass across the front of this property and give the property access off TH 101. 4) The tract of land had direct rail access to the South. The applicant feels that this fact, together with the surrounding land uses and good highway access makes this well - suited to industrial •uses. 5) There is a question whether this lot can be feasibly served with sanitary sewer. This question will have to be addressed at the time that the property is platted. Water is extended (12" main) just to the west at the Cretex Plant. 6) The soils are well- suited to all types of development. 7) Staff finds that the property is well - suited to industrial uses. Staff additionally feels that there is very little difference between highway business -type uses that would be attracted to this and heavy•industrial uses that would locate on this tract. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning from B -1 to I -2. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Recommend approval to the City Council to rezone from B -1 to I -2. TK/ j iw • i . . • ., . \ \ ---- -' 'Lake ‘ • .-* - ,,,. \ • N . 1 _... .; ... \ \ \ ,.. :.. . • •1 ,.. .... • F i sher Lake 11 1 I . , 1 1 it •'' : t ■ I I '' ■ ,. . .. . ''." ',.. NN •.. ;Q: ,....,... \ ■ .. • 'l .. ' - - - - - — - ---•--- - -- .:*. -•-.. . 1 ....... ---,.. ,■ - ..' .. ,:•:. ' 44%, — .s.. .2. . X , \ ,i \--.... -. 4..... I ... 1 1 1 :3 --:-' '''''• / 0 ,.',, •.•44. I \ ...."---.L.„ II •'" .,,•. w., , .., ..---_,, ,...__......--:::.. --.-. .-- • ... ,.i. 1 '''' I j ti111%,**004, • ' . • , : 4411164kottti. . - - r ``"All,. 410 ' — 1 ■ \ '''''.2 ........_ ''''''■■ ' OR • vvEST .."344......„ -;-., ERA/ -..., I - i ta ** \,. \ \ WW ‘ 111 111 " HIM " "1" Hrn"11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 • • 1 1 . / , ': V • • ___________ • \ . 7t ' lkIl V. .• (DAI IIII ' ' 134 z . i - 11 - 1 1 " 10 1 W697 of . ,----- -- tio4F-113471s-v. l000 ° SE NO. LOT LOCATION [SCALE ) P( .. • ORDINANCE NO. 45, FOURTH SERIES E . AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE DESIGNATING ZONING IN THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE 0 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: Shakopee City Code, Section 11.21, Amended as Follows: That portion of the Shakopee City Code, Section 11.21, which designates that certain parcel described as follows: The West 504.00 feet (as measured at.•right angles) .of :the East 559.00 feet (as measured at right angles) of that part of the East 1/2 of the Southeast Quarter (SEA) of Section 2, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, lying Southerly of the Southerly Right -of -way line of State Trunk Highway No. 101. TOGETHER with that part of the West 504.00 feet (as measured at right angles) of the East 599.00 feet (as measured at right angles) of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE3 of NE4) of Section 11. Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, lying Northerly of the Northerly Right -of -way • line of the Hastings and. Dakota division of the Chicago,. Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad. Containing 20 • acres more or less. • as B -1 Highway Business be amended to designate said parcel as I -2 Heavy Industrial Zone status. SECTION II: Provision After Adoption: After adoption, signing and attestation, this • ordinance shall be published once in ,the official newspaper of the City and shall be in effect on and after the day following such publication. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk City Attorney Approved as to form this day of , 1980 • DATE: August 14, 1980 1 CASE: P.C. 80 -33R ITEM: Rezoning B -1 (Highway Business) to I -2 (Heavy 1 APPLICANT: Elk River Concrete Company .LOCATION: TH 101 east of Cretex ZONING /LAND USE: B -1 (Highway Business) /Industrial AREA: 20 acres APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 11.33; Section 11.03 Subd 5; FINDINGS `REQUIRED: Section 11.04 Subd 71 Section 11.04 Subd 7 PUBLIC HEARING • CASE HEARD BY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CASE HEARD ON SEPT. 2, 1980 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a rezoning from B -1 (Highway Business) to I -2 (Heavy Industrial). This zoning change will amend the Comprehensive Plan in accord- ance with this zoning change. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY: Surrounding Land Uses: North AG (agriculture) /Vacant South I -1 (Light Industrial) /Vacant East B -1 (Highway Business) /Vacant • West I -2 (Heavy Industrial) /Cretex Plant Urban Services Availability: Sanitary Sewer - Service extended to Block 1 of Cretex Plat to the west. Storm Sewer - none A Water - Service to east end of • Cretex Plat CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the subject property for a commercial land use. Section 11.03 Subd 5 states that "Any significant change in zoning granted by the Council shall automatically amend the Comprehensive Plan in accordance with said zoning change. " • 2. This parcel was platted as part of the Cretex Industrial Park. Elk River Concrete is presently expanding its • present operation to this lot. 3. At its August 5, 1980 meeting, the City Council accepted the feasibility study for a T.H. 101 frontage road from Sheily Rd to Co. Rd. 89. This road would pass across the front of this property and give the property access off TH 101. 4. The tract of land had direct rail access to the South. The applicant feels that this fact, together with the surrounding land uses and good highway access makes this site well- suited to industrial uses. 7 • DATE: August 14, 1980 CASE: P.C. 80 -33R ITEM: Rezoning B -1 (Highway Business) to I -2 (Heavy Industrial) APPLICANT: Elk River Concrete Company LOCATION: TH 101 East of Cretex ZONING /LAND USE: B -1 (Highway Business) /Industrial AREA: 20 acres APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 11.33; Section 11.03 Subd 5; FINDINGS REQUIRED: Section 11.04 Subd 7I Section 11.04 Subd 7 PAGE -2- CONSIDERATIONS: S. The site is presently served with water but not sanitary sewer. The sanitary sewer can be feasibly extended to this lot in the future. 6. The soils are well - suited to all types of development. 7. Staff finds that the property is well- suited to industrial uses. Staff additionally feels that there is very little difference between highway business -type uses that would be attracted to this and heavy industrial uses that would locate on this tract. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommeds approval of a rezoning from B -1 (Highway Business) to I -2 (Heavy Industrial). PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Recommend approval to the City Council to rezone from B -1 to I -2. Tim Keane City Planner City of Shakopee • -`� � � B /ue Lake ` 7 .� ` --. _ ._ _ _ _ Fisher La, • 1. 6 1 ---- .._ 1 14+udv.s!ti4i to.l f�'G#. ti,k; h: +'f T , Tam a. _..t._..., --- -------t-----„:......, 1 O .. ......_ „.,...._ ,, ___ *. k i r ,1444■ w "'INV.I.:,,.....•,. . i ,,itlAsi,,4,b. _ , ' , '' � �RTN WA • " "` %:, I • ■ T ERN R , R ,: x ,, E. .� � 4§k,,, w C -2. . ": :: '' ):\\.. 1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 (111►IIIIIII1111111i11' Ell • 1 e , ________ -, I IY��" Iw „ 1 00 ;TITIONER . ®ATE 101 E.- J \SE NO. 8o- LOT LOCATION C SC LE P� ORDINANCE NO. 46, FOURTH SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE • DESIGNATING ZONING IN THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: Shakopee City Code, Section 11.21, Amended as Follows: That portion of the Shakopee City Code, Section 11.21, which designates that certain parcel described as follows: Lot 2, Block 2, Cretex Industrial Park, according to the plat thereof on file and of record, in the office of_the Registrar of Title in and for Scott County, Minnesota. as "B -1" Highway Business to designate said parcel as "I -2" Heavy Industrial Zone status. SECTION II: Provisions After Adoption :' After adoption, signing and attestation, this ordinance shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City and shall'be in effect on and after the day following such publication. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form, this day of , 1980 • City Attorney • DATE: August 8, 1980 CASE: P.C. 80 -18P ITEM: Final Plat - Link's 2nd Addition APPLICANT: Clete Link LOCATION: 3rd & Naumkeag, 4th & Prairie ZONING /LAND USE: R -3, Moderate Density Residential /Vacant _ _ AREA: .83 Acres APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 11.27; Section 12/04 FINDINGS REQUIRED: Section 12 CASE HEARD BY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CASE HEARD ON SEPT. 2, 1980 PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary plat consisting of the replatting of four vacant lots to realign them to the side streets. • SITE SUITABILITY Soils: Dakota loam, shallow bedrock, suitable for urban development Topography: Generally flat Vegetation: Primarily grasses LAND USE COMPATIBILITY Surrounding Land Uses: North - R -3, Moderate Density Residential/ Single family homes South - B -2 Community Business /Utilities & Public Works Buildings East - R -3, Moderate Density Residential/ Single family homes, clinic West - R -2, Urban Residential /Single family homes Land Use Plan: Medium density residential History: Originally platted as part of East Shakopee, recorded 1856. Never built URBAN SERVICES AVAILABILITY Sanitary Sewer: Available to east lots on Naumkeg St. Southwest lots must be served by an extension from 4th St. Water: Available to east lots on Naumkeg St. Southwest lots must be served by an extension between 3rd St. and 4th St. Storm Water: Drainage and grading plan have not yet been submitted by the developer's engineer. Parks: Hiawatha Park 1/2 mile to S.W. Huber Park, 1/2 mile to N.W. Schools:. Pearson and Central elementary 2/3 mile. Junior and Senior High School 1 mile. • • 7C, P.C. 80 -18P • Final Plat Page -2- CONSIDERATIONS: 1. At the February 28, 1980 Board of Adjustment meeting a lot area variance (P.C. 80 -4V) was granted to permit the construction of two - family homes on these lots less than 11,000 square feet. 2. The ,proposed plat consists of the replatting of four existing lots to re- orient them off of the busier east -west streets onto the north -south streets. Fourth Avenue is designated - .a colletor street. Driveway access for the lots will be from Naumkeag and Prairie Streets. 3. At its June 3, 1980 meeting, the City Council granted pre- liminary plat approval conditioned on: 1. Approval of drainage plan by City Engineer. 2. Provision of developer's security agreement.. 3. .Provision of park dedication in cash. 4. Removal of garage on lot 10 prior to issuance of building permit to lot1, block 2. 5. Provision of sidewalk or postponed construction agreement for sidewalk along 4th Avenue. 6. Approval of final utility plan by the Utilities Manager. STAFF RECOMMEDATION: Staff recommends final plat approval conditioned on: 1. Submission and approval by City Engineer of • road construction plans. 2. Execution of a developers agreement. 3. Approval of a title opinion by the City Attorney. 4. Utility plan approved by the Utilities Commission. 5. Park dedication to be paid in cash. 6. Construction of Prairie Street between 3rd and 4th Ave. 7. Approval of drainage plan and overlot grading plan by the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: • Recommend approval to the City Council on the Final Plat of Link's 2nd Addition subject to the above seven staff recommendations for approval plus the following: • • 8. Provision of sidewalk or postponed construction side- walk agreement whereby property owners would agree to •construct sidewalk upon request of the City. 9. Removal of the garage on Lot 1, Block 2, prior to Building Permit • • -4,--- _ . 1• • • 4 . • N -rr • ,, ;., 1, * ' --------- - ( . , ‘ a . r \ . . 11.;4,‘:,. a., A it ! - - • . .. ;Ilk sk 1 co _ g 11.-- . . 5 10 g o ,.•.-- a . f v .,1 • 110 3 .,,i''' '',11:,-27:144,.'''),:r.111%;°i'l• IA V 0 Irlirt _ 111 . li ili .I, N W. 1 -u u , t '', . . Vet S 'IN ■ I 4 1\ -- A \iA *, . i ..... --. t.. ..... ki ul i t , - .. ....to ,... i ..,,,......,,y,......0i..‘ • • E -, . 1. Ilk * V i • t % .. i ; I ilia • 11 II L . . , : ..*41% V '''.. 11111 1 ' ri 1 uTILIT? .. . BLDG 'cX I*. ' . i 44 4 ... --, 4:1 ______ ct .....I -.1 . #0 ilil Irl . . ' ' ' ‘ 3 ; ' - • t ...... 5 2 4.: (.) (r) , . . , 1 MUNICIPAL E S R\ BUILDING • G O R t h i i L AN i .-''''''''''''..''''--..„..,...,,,sk'?".:14'''';:''''''''''4.k11-'4 fzE • . . • i SI kr.z, [ „---,,,, . , I ,.I 11-,,L+77\ ,... t \t ... L_ YT EA 4"71-.” C-' • • DATE 00 ----_-2- I __ _AE- NAutv\-r-ff-zi j cITIONER 4TH- 4.743-6-11.- SCALE ' .. G. ... • T-.---- -3E NO. L- LOCATION „,, 7 ii■g4tiVV:1•PitrilfP • 1 .;v:vt.,"cpip.,”, ; e:Y*,, I $ ' ! r• z .. ,,.... c .'"2 4, • •',. . ::',.- . ‘ :.. 01, f. ....,:•,:••••::::::..,•••:,...,•••• = - idlo,,,.. , 4 ..., .. - .........-1 ....„,.......„.,, 4 '...N.r ? : /:.„, .. ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ,..F- 4„,.,... .....,...,, -77... ; ;: . 'F.::',..•:.i.:.i:,.':.:::-.: . s.;:.:.., , ?:::::::: ,, , ,, ..;,,,,Ait,ti 4. ,,,,....,...... ,.' ..;t600.% 2.... , ' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' :%.....,..;:...'.'...• :' .... ' r: ,•:.'.-:::::-.::::::..i::.. ,,......4,0,v2;;;6 .. • '":1 . ••,.1. .,...,-.• t.,..„.....,,,,,,,, ''''' " f, .':iir "... .,• .4 LO 'i:: it -,:.• Apia_ ..., .. i siteet '" t ....,,,:: ,,,,,,:, . ,. la Ile -;i . - 41 • i'il 0 ;,,,,. lite 1 1 I il 0 ' ..• VA . „,„,„. o mtgovo' . ;i: • 1 10 0 i viv o. ,, - — vs 4 I lievigook go la . , millt 1111111111k I l t,2 ril". 1 \-'301.0004.00.600,. .010;opoOMOr',.);.461-"411ifivi. _ larmlittb.. miiiiii........, ri 11"- T i glat o , I N 44 ' Ifi '-t I 11111 1 k 1 ;Al I er. re:04.11 6 111110 i ___Ii W ,ififV 71 Ili l ik AillIN` 4 rilik Al 2t . +6,04 4 1%,tli .. „.,...fol:, 1150....211 w.Pri, t, : , .5,-i.- -,.,* gis , • 'I • Lsi ' WOO will •,.. Mii ,,,. .....,,.„:„4„...3..,,...,.... _ x . •. ,i,...•,...,‘,.,............„..„..,,...,„..,..,...„ .ifaittOOWAIVI.VIV -, .- 1 JetteNt..7 .41 „gm,. ;,,,....,., i . . „A irr P0f, ,. liss u ., I . ' • _.C1 — , . 1 *It ■ lb. i P .. cc . "ke 5 4 tt !:-.. :'.'...: + WOO V. 7 -••• k .•.-:-:--.--,..,/..- — ', 1 sy• kdA i ' l ilt ' • • LD S _LI - •"' MUNICIPAL SERVICE (I) 1 4 Cc • ' BUILDING r .„ ..„..m - ,, , • ,, • ,,, • •, . r f". (-• • • ' " • RI". . - • • - "T"E'--771..0.67.'EP 1,—.C3i—F27 • 1 '‘• '' • • - ------ \ ,e iETITIONER . [DATE / /..- 2 7 3E 4 I'4l)it-i\4v-F--ct . 7 00 /8 r 4 ' 4- Fizr4--4:2--1_. -‘1 co ' ASE NO. LOT LOCATION SCALE j P • • _ __ , — ........... • • RESOLUTION NO. 1684 L A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF LINK'S 2nd ADDITION • • WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee has approved the Final Plat of Link's 2nd Addition and has recommended it adoption; and WHEREAS, all notices of hearing have been duly sent and posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council has been fully advised in all things. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, that the Final Plat of Link's 2nd Addition, described • as follows: • Lots 1 and 2, Block 27, EAST SHAKOPEE, Scott County, Minnesota according to the recorded plat thereof; and that part of the vacated alley in said Block 27, described as follows: Beginning at the northwesterly corner of said lot 1; thence northerly along the northerly extension of the westerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 8.00 feet; thence easterly par - allel with the northerly line of said Lots 1 and 2, a distance of 120.00 feet to the intersection with the northerly extension of the easterly line of said Lot 2; thence southerly along said northerly extension a distance of 8.00 feet to the north- easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence westerly along the • northerly line of said Lots 2 and 1, a distance of 120.00 feet to the point of beginning. Together with Lots 6 and 7, Block 27, EAST SHAKOPEE, Scott County, Minnesota according to the recorded plat thereof; and that part of the vacated alley in said Block 27, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Lot 6; thence southerly along the southerly extension of the easterly line of said Lot 6, a distance 8.00 feet; thence westerly parallel with the southerly lines of said Lots 6 and 7, a distance of 120.00 feet to the intersection with the southerly extension of the westerly line of said Lot 7; thence northerly along said southerly extension a ^ distance of 8.00 feet to the southwesterly corner of said lot 7; thence easterly along the southerly lines of said Lots 7 and 6, a distance of 120.00 to the point of beginning. be, and the same hereby is approbed and adopted with the requirements that 1). Submission and approval by City Engineer of road construction plans. 2) Execution of a Developers Agreement. 3) Approval of a Title Opinion by the City Attorney. 4) Utility plan approved by the Utilities Commission. 5) Park dedication to be paid in cash. • -? • 6) Construction of Prairie Street between 3rd and 4th Avenues. 7) Approval of drainage plan and overlot grading plan by the City Engineer. 8) Provision of sidewalk or postponed construction sidewalk agreement (whereby property owners would agree to construct sidewalk upon request of the City). • 9) Removal of the garage on Lot 1, Block 2, prior to issuance of Building Permit. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Administrator • be and the same are hereby authorized and directed to execute said approved Plat and Developers Agreement. Adopted in • session of the City Council of the City of,Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: • City. Administrator Approved as to form this day of , 1980. • City Attorney • • I DATE: August 14, 1980 CASE: PC 80 -26P 1 ITEM: Final Plat Approval (Halo 2nd Addition) APPLICANT: Wallace Bakken & Associates LOCATION: Highway 101 and Marschall Road ZONING /LAND USE: B -1 Highway Business, AG (Agriculture) /Vacant AREA: 4.6 Acres APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Chapter 12, Subdivision Regulations FINDINGS REQUIRED: Section 11.29 Land,Use Regulations CASE HEARD BY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL: CASE HEARD ON 9/2/80 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Final Plat approval of a re -plat of the Halo 2nd Addition. URBAN SERVICES AVAILABILITY: Storm Sewer: On Marschall Road; proposed catch basins on Trunk Highway 101 Sanitary Sewer: Stub hook -ups to existing 8" line on T.H. 101 Water: 6" line proposed through plat from,T:H. 101 to . Bluff Avenue CONSIDERATIONS: 1) The Halo 2nd Addition received Preliminary Plat approval from the City Council on July 15, 1980, subject to the following conditions: 1. Submission and approval by the City Engineer of the construction plans for utilities, sidewalk, street improvements and a deceleration lane; 2. Submission of easements for: a) a 20' emergency vehicle access drive on the East side of Lot 3; b) drainage and ponding • c) roadway easement across E 298' of Lot 4 and dedicated right-of-way option of the City d) utility lines 3. Driveway locations be approved by the City Engineer 4. Removal of piles and debris before issuance of a Building Permit for Lot 4 Planning Commission Page -2- PC 80 -26P August 14, 1980 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends Final Plat approval of Halo 2nd Addition conditioned upon: 1) The developer petitioning City Council for City construction of public improvements. 2) Submission of sidewalk easements for public walkways. 3) Completion of the sale of the property along the North side of Lot 4 by the City. 4) Park dedication to be paid in cash. 5) Written approval from the Public Utilities Commission of the water plans. 6) Submission of 42' utility easement across the northwest corner of Lot 4 for the MWCC force main. 7) Final approval by City Engineer of the construction plans for utilities, sidewalk, street improvements and the deceleration lane. 8) Submission of easements for: a) 20' emergency vehicle access drive on the East side of Lot 3 b) Drainage and ponding. c) Roadway easement across the East 298' of Lot 4 and dedicated right -of -way at the option of the City. 9) Driveway locations to be approved by the City Engineer. 10) Removal of piles and debris before issuance of a Building Permit for Lot 4. 11) Submission of a 400' scale reduction of the Final plat. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Recommendation of approval to the City Council subject to the above eleven staff recommendations for approval with the addition to No. 7 to include approval from the State Highway Department and additions to No. 8 a) 20' emergency vehicle access drive on the East side of Lot 3 to be declared as a Fire Lane easement.; b) Temporary drainage and ponding easement; and c) Roadway easement across the northwest 289' of Lot 4 and dedicated right -of -way at the option of the City. TK/ j iw • • • RESOLUTION NO. 1683 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF HALO 2nd ADDITION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee has approved.the Final Plat of Halo 2nd Addition and has recommended its adoption; and • WHEREAS, all notices of hearing have been duly•sent, and posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council has been fully advised in all things. NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, that the Final Plat of Halo 2nd Addition, as described . in "Exhibit A" attached hereto and made a part hereof be, and the same hereby is approved and adopted with the requirements that: 1) The developer petitioning City Council for City construction of public improvements. 2) Submission of sidewalk easements for public walkways. 3) .Completion of the sale of the property along the North side of Lot 4 by the City. 4) .Park dedication to be paid in cash. 5) Written approval from the Public Utilities Commission of the water plans. 6) Submission of 42' utility easement across the northwest corner of Lot 4 for the [MCC force main. 7) Final approval by City Engineer and State Highway Department of the construction plans for utilities, sidewalk, street improvements and the deceleration lane. 8) Submission of easements for: a) 20' emergency vehicle access drive on the East side of Lot 3, to-be declared as a Fire Lane easement b) Temporary :drainage . and ponding easement. c) Roadway easement across the northwest 289' of Lot 4 and dedicated right -of -way at the option_ of the City. • 9) Driveway locations to be approved by the City Engineer and State Highway Department. • 10) Removal of poles and debris before issuance of a Building Permit for Lot 4. 11) Submission of a 400' scale reduction of the final plat. - • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Administrator be and the same are hereby authorized and directed to execute said approved Plat and Developers Agreement. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of , 1980. • Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: • City Administrator Approved as to form this day of , 1980. - City Attorney • MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tim Keane, City Planner RE: Rosenwinkle Mineral Extraction Request for 130 Acres Southwest of County Road 16 & County Road 83 DATE: August 28, 1980 • At the July 24 and August 14, 1980 meetings, the Planning Commission reviewed a proposal for a Mineral Extraction Permit request. The purpose of this discussion was to give guidance to the applicant as to what information the Planning Commission would require for adequate review of the permit request. The Planning Commission recommended that this action be forwarded to the City Council for your information. Section 11.05 Subd. 7 of the City Code requires a permit to be approved prior to all commercial mining operations. After staff and Planning Commission review of the Mineral Extraction Permit Review Requirements, the Commission concluded that the substance of the ordinance provides assurances for adequate review of the Extraction Permit. The ordinance basically requires the information necessary for the Planning Commisssion to make a determination of whether the land use is appropriate to the site. The ordinance also establishes performance standards relative to the ongoing operation of such a facility and reclamation of the site. The Planning Commission recommended that the permit application include all of the information required in Section 11.05 Subd. 7B, with additional information required to include: 1. Traffic impact analysis prepared by a traffic engineer addressing: a) Projected increase in traffic volumes b) Existing load capacity on principal routes c) Impact of additional loads on routes over the life of the mining operation. 2. Hydrological Analysis prepared by an acceptable expert addressing: a) Changes in surface drainage patterns and impact on water quality. b) Impact on groundwater quality and surrounding wells Memo Page -2- The City may also request the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for review by the State Environmental Quality Board (note attached). The EAW review may be considered for review•of regional impacts and other environmental concerns. If an EAW is requested by the local unit of government, its review should be completed prior to City approval of necessary permits. The Planning Commission discussed the preparation of an EAW. Three Commission members spoke in favor of an EAW, although no motion was made or action taken to require this process be commenced. TK /dc • • • 7 ft • Subd. 7. Mineral Extraction and Land Rehabilitation. A. Permit Review. A permit shall be required for all commercial mining operations. Said permit shall be valid for a three (3) year period, after which a permit renewal shall be re- quired. Persons requesting a mining permit shall submit said fee to the Planning Commission together with all information required in this Subdivision. The owner shall provide five (5) copies of the required information. All residents and landowners within 1,000 feet of the proposed mining operations shall be notified in writing of the permit request and the date of the Planning Com- mission review. Notification shall be mailed at least ten (10) days prior. to the Planning Commission review. If the request is denied, no reapplication shall be made for a period of six (6) months. B. Information Required. The following informa- tion shall be provided by.the person requesting the permit: 1. Name and address of person requesting the mining permit. 2. The exact legal property description and acreage of area to be mined. 3. The following maps of the entire site and to include all areas within 500 feet of the site. All maps shall be drawn at a scale of one (1) inch to one hundred (100) feet un- less.otherwise stated below: • Map A - Existing conditions to include: Contour lines at five (5) foot intervals. Existing vegetation. Existing drainage and permanent water areas. Existing structures. Existing wells. Map B - Proposed operations to include: Structures to be erected. Location of sites to be mined showing depth of pro- posed excavation. Location of tailings deposits showing maximum height of deposits. Location of machinery to be used in the mining opera-, tion. Location of storage of mined materials, showing height of storage deposits. Location of vehicle parking. Location of storage of explosives. 'Erosion and sediment control structures. Map C - End use plan to include: 'Final grade of proposed site showing elevations and contour lines at five (5) foot intervals. Location and species of vegetation to be replanted. Location and nature of any structures to be erected in relation to the end use plan. -294- 7 j2-- • 4. A soil erosion and sediment control plan. '"Th 5. A plan for dust and noise control. 6. A full and adequate description of all phases of the proposed operation to include an estimate of dura- tion of the mining operation. 7. Any other information requested by the Planning Commission. • C. Performance Standards. 1. General Provisions. Weeds and any other unsightly or noxious vegetation shall be cut or trimmed as may be necessary to preserve a reasonably neat appearance and to prevent seeding on adjoining property. No sand and gravel operation shall be conducted on parcels of less than twenty (20) acres in size. This limitation shall not apply when the tract of land is contiguous to an active mining operation, provided that both tracts are being operated by the same sand and gravel producer. • All equipment used for mining operations shall be constructed, maintained and operated in such a manner as to minimize, as far as is practicable, noises and vibrations which are injurious or substantially annoying to persons living in the vicinity. 2. Water Resources. The mining operation shall not be allowed to interfere with surface water drainage be- yond the boundaries of the mining operation. The mining operation shall not adversely affect the quality of surface or subsurface • water resources. Surface water originating outside and passing through the mining site shall, at its point of departure from the • mining site, be of equal quality to the water at the point where it enters the mining site. The mining operator shall perform any water treatment necessary to comply with this provision. 3. Safety Fencing. Any mining operation adjacent to a residential zone or within 300 feet of two (2) or more residential structures shall be bound by the following stan- dards:— • (a) Where collections of water occur that are one and one -half (11/2) feet or more in depth existing for any period of at least one (1) month, and occupy an area of 700 square feet or more, all access to such collections of water shall be barred by a fence or some similarly effective barrier such as a snow fence of at least four (4) feet in height. (b) In locations where slopes occur that are steeper than one (1) foot vertical to three (3) feet horizontal existing for a period of one (1) month or more, access to such slopes shall be barred by. a fence or some similarly ef- fective barrier such as a snow fence at least four (4) feet in height. 4. Mining Access Roads. The location of the intersection•of mining access roads with any public roads shall be selected such that traffic on the access roads will have a sufficient distance of the public road in view so that any turns onto the public road can be completed with a margin of safety. 5. Screening Barrier. To minimize problems of dust and noise and to shield mining operations from public view, a screening barrier shall be maintained between the mining -295- • 7-) • y.� Y site and adjacent residential and commercial properties. A screening barrier shall also be maintained between the mining site and any public road within 500 feet of any mining or pro- cessing operations. The screening barrier shall be planted with a species of fast growing trees such as green ash. Existing trees and ground cover along public road frontage shall be pre- served, maintained (and supplemented), for the depth of the road- side setback'except where traffic safety requires cutting and trimming. 6. Setback. Processing of minerals shall not be conducted closer than 100 feet to the property line or closer than 500 feet to any residential or commercial structures located prior to commencement of processing operations without the written consent of all owners and residents of said struc- tures. :Mining operations shall not be conducted closer. than 30 feet to boundary of any zone where such operations are not permitted, nor shall such production or processing be conducted closer than 30 feet to the boundary of an adjoining property line, unless the written consent of the owner in fee of. such adjoining property is first secured in writing. Mining opera- tions shall not be conducted closer than 30 feet to the right -of way line of any existing or platted street, road or highway, ex- cept that excavating may be conducted within such limits in order to reduce the elevation thereof in conformity to the existing or platted street, road or highway. • 7. Appearance. All buildings, structures c:r!, and plants used for the production of processing of sand and ttiV gravel shall be maintained in such a manner as is practicable and according to acceptable industrial practice as to assure that such buildings, structures and plants will not become dangerously dilapidated. 8. Hours of Operation. All mining opera- tions shall be conducted between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 7:00 • P.M. Any operations not conducted between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. shall require a conditional use permit. Such per- mits shall be granted for public or private emergency or whenever any reasonable or necessary repairs to equipment are required to be made. 9. Dust and Dirt. All equipment used for • mining operations shall be constructed, maintained and operated in such a manner as to minimize, as far as is practicable, dust conditions which are injurious or substantially annoying to per- sons living within 600 feet of the mining operations lot line. All access roads from mining operations to public highways, roads or streets or to adjoining property shall be paved or surfaced with gravel to minimize dust conditions. The above limitations shall not apply to any mining open -ation in any industrial zone, unless such operations are closer than 150 yards to another zone other than'an industrial zone. • D. Land Rehabilitation. All mining sites shall • be rehabilitated immediately after mining operations cease. Re- fill habilitation shall be complete within one (1) year. The follow - '/ in standards shall apply:' 9 pP Y:' -296- .v J • ' V M 7 • 1. Within a period of three (3) months after the termination of a mining operation, or within three (3) months after abandonment of such operation for a period of six (6) months, or within three (3) months after expiration of a mining permit, all buildings, structures and plants incidental to such operation shall be dismantled and removed by, and at the expense of, the mining operator last operating such buildings, structures and plants. A conditional use permit may be granted for those buildings, structures, machinery and plants required to process previously mined materials stored on the site. Such permit may apply for only one (1) year, after which said buildings, struc- tures, machinery and plants shall be removed. 2. The peaks and depressions of the area shall be graded and backfilled to a surface which will result in gently rolling topography in substantial conformity to the land area immediately surrounding, and which will minimize erosion due to rainfall. No finished slope shall exceed eighteen percent (18 %) in grade. 3. Reclaimed areas shall be sodded or sur- faced with soil of a quality at least equal to the topsoil of land areas immediately surrounding, and to a depth of at least three (3) inches. Such required topsoil shall be planted with legumes and grasses. Trees and shrubs may also be planted, but not as a substitute for legumes and grasses. Such planting shall adequately retard soil erosion. Excavations completed to a water producing depth need not be backfilled if the water depth is at least ten (10) feet and if banks shall be sloped to the water. line at a slope no greater than three (3) feet horizontal to one (1) foot vertical. The finished grade shall be such that it will not adversely affect the surrounding land or future development of the site upon which mining operations have been conducted. The finished plan shall restore the mining site to a condition whereby it can be utilized for the type of land use proposed to occupy the site after mining operations cease. Subd. 8. Mobile Homes. Mobile homes shall be regula- ted by Section 4.60 of the City Code, except that mobile homes shall be a conditional use in the "A -1" and "R -1" Districts for agricultural purposes if they meet the following standards: A. Property must be being used as an agricultural use. B. Mobile home may not he the only occupied resi- dential structure on the property. C. The persons living in the mobile home must be related to the farm operator and must work on that farm. D. The mobile home be placed on the property for no more than five (5) years. E. The conditional use must he reviewed on an an- nual basis: Subd. 9. Moving of Structures. A conditional use per- mit shall be required before a building permit is issued to move any dwelling unit or other structure to a permanent location within the City. The minimum requirements of a conditional use -297- 9tt MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, Deputy City Clerk RE: Vacation Request of Northrup King Co. DATE: August 29, 1980 At an earlier Council Meeting the Council moved to set a date for the public hearing of public property, pursuant to a petition filed by Northrup King Co. This public hearing was set for September 2nd at 8:30 P.M. Mr. Coller has advised me that the Council should adopt a resolution initiating the vacation and setting the public hearing, as the petition may not be signed by the necessary amount of property owners in the area and thus is invalid. Action: Adoption of Reso.uiton No. 1691 DSR /jsc • • RESOLUTION NO. 1691 A RESOLUTION INITIATING THE VACATION OF THE PUBLIC PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, A PETITION has been received by abutting property owners, requesting the vacation of the following described property: 1. The alley in Block 175, Original Shakopee 2. All of Washington Street adjacent to Block 175 3. Part of the North Half of the alley in Block 3 of Koeper's Addition NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, That a hearing be held in the Council Chambers on the 7th day of October, 1980 at 8:30 P.M., or thereafter, on the matter-of vacating the above described public property lying within the City of Shakopee. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That two week's published notice be given by publication in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS and posted notice be given by two weeks posting a copy of such notice on the bulletin board in the main floor of the Scott County Court House, on the bulletin:. board in the Shakopee City Hall and on the bulletin board in the lobby of the First National Bank of Shakopee. Adopted in session of the Shakopee City Council held this _ day of , 1980 • Mayor of the City of Shakopee • ATTEST: City Administrator Approved asto form this 'day of , 1980 • City Attorney RESOLUTION NO.1681 A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE 1979/1980 DISEASED SHADE TREE RET WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee has received a letter'from thefollowing onwers of property waiving their right to a public hearing: Wampach Mary Casanova Jessie 0. Kronfuss Clair Van Maldeghem Francis' Huth:' Albert Henderson Tom Chian Curtis Leverson Wayne L. `Olson St - Mary'•s - Church•; Alvina :Kdpisca Alice Davies Ricklick and • WHEREAS, the City Council received and approved a report on June 28, 1977ron the City Administrator outlining the City of Shakopee;'s Diseased Shade Tree Removal Program; and '• •''WHEREAS;Ithe Diseased Shade Tree Removal Program as approved provides that the City of Shakopee will contract with provate firms to 'remove -trees on provate property, apply to the State on Minnesota for, .a.subsidy`of the costs and special assess the remaining costs to the- property owner •• :•-NOW,'THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, tha•t' /1980 Diseased Shade Tree Removal Program for the City of Shakopee is hereby ordered. Adopted in Session of the City Council of the City ,of ; Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1980. of :i , Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved`as to form this day of , 1980. City Attorney RESOLUTION N0. 1682 • A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE COST TO BE ASSESSED, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF AND SETTING A HEARING DATE ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 1979/1980 DISEASED SHADE TREE REMOVAL PROGRAM • WHEREAS, contracts have heretofore been let for the 1979/1980 Diseased Shade Tree,Removal Program covering the removal of shade trees from the foilowing property: . • .,.�,Original�.Shakopee Plat,: Lot.6;-Block 72; Lot 6, Block 60; Lot 7, ' Block 21; All of Block 75; W 55' of Lot 9, Block 56; Lot 3, Block 73,; E ,55',-of ,Lot 8,, Block ,34. Cletus Link Addition: Lots 4 - Block 2, inclusive. East Shakopee Palt: W 60' of E 120' of S 2 of Block 1. Capesius Addition: Lot 2 EX N 197' thereof G & 0 Addition: Lot 22 and N 20' of Lot 23, Block 5, EX W 24.6' thereof a .20 acre parcel lying within part of the SW4 of Sec. 6- 115 -22; a 2.27 acre parcel lying within Gov't. Lot 5, Sec. 6- 115 -22. WHEREAS, the contract price for such improvements is $3,733.00 acid the expenses incurred or to be incurred in making said improvements amounts to $3,733.00 so that . the total cost of the improvements would be $3,733.00 and of this $3,733.00 the State will pay $1,866.50 as its share of the costs and the City will pay $492.50 as its share of the costs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. That the cost of such improvements to be specially assessed is hereby declared to be $1,374.00 2. That the City Clerk, with the assistance of the•City Engineer, or his assistant, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be special assessed for such improvements against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected without regard to cash valuatio as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: 1. That a hearing shall be held on the 23rd day of September, 1980, in the City Hall at 7:35 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessments and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such I I G Resolution No. 1682 continued improvements and proposed assessments will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. •That-,the ;City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper of the City of Shakopee at least two weeks prior to the hearing and he_ shall state in the notice the total cost of the e.. ,, . Improvements. He shall also cause mailed notice of such hearing to be • .given.the_owner.,of•each parcel described in the assessment roll not less,than,two,weeks prior to the hearing. Adopted in ' session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, *Minnesota, held this day of , 1980. • 1 - •i , . • '• 1 Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST:— , . , ,,, • City Clerk , . • Approved as form this day of , 1980. . 4 . . City Attorney. ' i ._ , • ( . ( A ` • . i.. ,e a • MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder City Administrator • FROM: H. R. Spurrier City Engineer RE: Improvement of Prairie Street 3rd Avenue to 4th Avenue DATE: August 29, 1980 Attached please find the report for improvement of Prairie Street 3rd Avenue to 4th Avenue. The cost of this improve- ment appears to exceed the amount these lots could be benefited. The property owner that requested the work will want to address • Council regarding whether to proceed on this project or not. • • • HRS /jiw • Attachment • RESOLUTION NO. 1686 A RESOLUTION RECEIVING' A REPORT AND CALLING A HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT OF PRAIRIE STREET 3RD AVENUE TO 4TH AVENUE BY ROADWAY, WATERMAIN AND SANITARY SEWER NO. 80 -12 WHEREAS ; to Resolution No. 1651 of the City Council adopted, July 15, 1980 , a report has been prepared by Price of Suburban Engineering, with reference to the improvement of Prairie.Street between 3rd Avenue to 4th Avenue Ni Sanitary Sewer Laterals, watermain and raodway and this report was received by the City Council on !NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: • 1. The Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting and benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improve- ments pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Chapter 429 at an • estimated cost of the improvement of $80,800.00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the day of , 1980, in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota, at PM, or thereafter, and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and as required by law. 3. The work of this project is hereby designated as part of the 1980 -12 Public Improvement Program. Adopted in session of the City Councilof the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day 6f..1 • • , 1980. • City Attorney MEMO I TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator FROM: Gregg M. Voxland, Finance Director RE: Public Hearing for Revenue Sharing DATE: August 28, 1980 There is a Public Hearing on 9/2/80 in order to meet requirements that we hold a hearing on the Revenue Sharing Fund budget and the use of Revenue Sharing monies in the General Fund. GMV /dac • f MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator RE: 1981 Budget DATE: September 2, 1980 After our last meeting on the budget, I have reviewed the projected revenues again and find the following new projections. 1. If we use the fee schedule suggested by the City Engineer, we could raise an additional $20,000 in 1981. 2. If the Council levies a fee on Valleyfair, for Police Services, we could raise $20,000. 3. We have found the projection on planning grants to be $5,000 low. 4. Road and Bridge revenue from Scott County is now estimated to be $10,000 higher. 5. Special levies will now give an estimated $20,000 more. This gives us a total of $75,000 more in revenue.. We were $26,500 short and now need another $30,000 to off set the loss of state aid. Summary: The budget now looks like we are $19 under our levy limit. DSR/jsc f.. 9 MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator FROM: James Karkanan, Street Superintendent RE: Snow Fighting Equipment DATE: August 27, 1980 Our department is requesting Council approval for the purchase of the following items to be installed on our Ford Tandem Truck as Snow Fighting Equipment. * Denotes "Best" Ouotations SANDERS • - Hayden- Murphy (Mpls.) "Swenson" Model UR -310 $1,058.00* (Roller) "Swenson" Model UAZ -11 $1,508.2.0 (Spinner) - Ruffridge- Johnson Co. (Mpls.) "Central" Engineer Model S -330RL $1,550.00 (sp inner) - Itasca Equipment Company (Savage) "Hi -Way" Model TG -110 $1,586.00 (Spinner) "Hi -Way" Model TG -505 $1,486,00 (Roller) UNDERBODY BLADE -T. McMullen Company (St. Paul) "Root" F -5 Snoblade $2,021.00* • - Itasca Equipment Company Wausau U.B. Blade $3,700.00 FRONT PLOW BLADE (12 Ft) - Hayden- Murphy Co. (Mpls.) "Henke" power reversible plow with husting hitch $3,064.52* • I ' MEMO • Page -2- FRONT PLOW BLADE (12 ft.) -Falls Machine, Inc. (Little Falls) "Fall PR 1243 - $3,305 with husting hitch 550 $3,855.00 - Itasca Equipment Co. (Savage) "Wausau" Model R 4512 -HR Add husting hitch $600 $3,700 SIDE WING PLOWS - Itasca Equipment Co. (Savage) Coates Side Wing TW 120 -R -8 $2,100.00* Wausau Side Wing PW -9 $3,700.00 - Hayden- Murphy Co. Henke Side Wing - SW8 $2,300.00 Henke Side Wing - SW9 $2,414.00 -Falls Machine Co. (Little Falls) Falls Side Wing - W 10 $3,825.00 RECOMMENDATIONS: Sander - Hayden - Murphy Co. $1,058.00 Underbody Blade - McMullen Co. $2,021.00 • Front Plow - Hayden- Murphy Equipment Co_ $3,064.00 Side Wing Plow - Itasca Equipment Co, $2,100.00 TOTAL $8,243.00 Installation of equipment will be made by City personnel. JK /dc - — .., . il 4 ` , ...11 4 0T 41 ` ,, - ......, ..._ a Aza._"'............ ...___al— ,..... ..... - --- L...-113 '1 ,estreats r rr ..._ ..,.... ---. - .._ .............. .. . . 7 4 . . . , . . 4 • • ., • - .- . ' • ... • • . . • • . -- , 1. 1 . L. -,---- - Th H., , 11 I I r 1 1 ,,) C I , E , r r, / C • C _,„ C ) " 1 i • r 4 c; ) r 1 . 1 . , , , , .. __ i _ __......... • • . _...r - - - - - ; 1 . . % 1 I 1. ,.. , ..... . . .-. • , 1. i c- 1 r 1 • , — ..,1 • I l' r ' ,,,, 1 • . ' r ....- L .... . i - , ■ i -- - — • - formed 7 ga. combination trough and . hopper cover and adjustable end plates spill plate feed opening ,,....i---____. • .. . .________ .--- ................__ _ . ..... ........ __ _. ,.. . (-,;, t i • i . 1 . , •,,,,-. — ..•-..... i - ..,.,,) . . . , . QI ... •"'''' 1 l'-' . ...,%) 1 • 4•fr.- . ...,..... _.... .....• • , v ; ; , ; i :. , .;(1.. • I; .. 1 ? ; . - \ V c •-' -- 1 .; ' 1 .- • ' \ ; . 1 i i --, . • , / , • 1 r 1 tr" — i. - . 1 • ...--1 , .. . . ‘ . - . -...-• , 1 . t , : i• • 1 il i 1; I P' ,, ; i, , _ ... --.1 1 ': k 6 I ..4.... I 1 ; ; I , L__________. _ _____ _ _ : . ; t E 1 _ - •.4 • I I , ; .. \.. .: . . I • ' • ; ' . 1....... 'I. ,C -i--- s 1- __ i •;, .. I-- • -- ' t-,,!: 1•1, i 9 ' L- Kfc.t1 ''''":"1 T '':7". I- .. - • ' ''-'••' - - ..- lice f' _-_ . -7•7:: • :0,--.-,-------;-.- ........ :....:-;••■••,; ....7 :::::1___ . _. ,........_4._._,- .„ ...........•.. .....-•••--- , ' l';'••• ' .. ' • . . , 16 — "•-•......, - '- r. itta..........g....4-,C.v.C.,..:1-.:.....t.....--a......1.........- 1 ,,..- • ' • 71 ' NZ •,± . .t ' f ' .4 ,15: 4 t .. ..);,, , ......,•••■••- ) .1 ... .1, "it '4 ,i/i! ,, i •■•,..,: , , Za 1•• 1 iffimoliffiffiliNff ' •:°r• .,. „4' 5 • ' tf'' ); . 11..7 : : ', .*-!, ..1 : \' t' 4 : ?1•,• 1:1 L ., 11) -1 i ■- e,' " 4 re tl_Ct ,P II I ;.- .. C .44 k i k 'i ff.Lirrt le -s 11- ti k -i ' r e fF ,,* " . ; 41V.,,,, A Nr it414 4 -14' . 4):titiffritc 4 it k e ,-•;•:• i 't.i,:74...p,1, siv_ ,.%3•14!),..1-,i, E :::- ,t41.iK,-,,,c 1" -,z, . . ,...:: A ' e'Ll':. +k ;1-i , V0-/•;47„,;:k.-• . -'e w•. IV,I.-it' ••••••;, '- y. . • p.t. •,,AIO-Y s • ; ,‘ I, ,., .)4 ..; : . -V9r ! , ': - . 4 ;.;;;, ,, ' 1 ';';•v* 'L 747-..1%v;•. - ,-..w 4;r,..-Itr-I---e' .vtli.y • ,...34 •,, : 4 ‘, s ., t * f•-,, ,I - 1:214, 4 i#if; ,i,s . ix., tt,takr.401 .. _ . l „/"Irrief frttk„-` t, - . ,-, , - ,: x•17. L„.74 d , ,, , tk- , ,...0,-1 , 0 10.211.1.4z u t-,p - .11 ..r..4., '& o'':f4t.g. "n:.4..:4,, NI, *. 4., .. ., ...6 . ,4",,,.,7 - t , , .. , ,.,,,t,.. „:0., , .4 .... , ,,,,, . , ,A....,,,,, .. „..,,, • ,,,.....,i;.• ,..`, ....0,- vi.6'• ,,,,r , 4 , 4 ••„f , 4 ktrtettt ""g'7••,;:le ' tlPf14..41 --teilt, 11, , 21* .•.! R• " 4,• , ir• - kt, ,, f-14•11 13 4 - •••■ •itys•ifit-'; 1. - ,.. " ;•'• • , 4 ' • • ! '•• *-* •. • 4,14'4 .'6 ^ 1 ' '' 4k1 . 0 %it15 . q..■;:kirAl, , h,tiji '40"`"" ' -.. 'r . . P- Igti l ie.?" 1 , 1 , 1 ",4'. 2r W t' , 111;1• 1 1.: ,-.':,. .-„i•,., A 4 : '` '4. ' , f+' .. r 1W1 ..,.s4 ), •,- A.-..II) -.-P„.-i•vde..1/4.4..,1.4 . . . -.• i 7..to, . '' i', t.; '''fiA tv-i4r61,4y.,..p.0,,,N..rih...4. .,,, • . _ !k -I -; ce , -‘.-.. ‘101 ' :;, ..54i•v- ' , .0..,. , ,, . • , , ,,, 0, . - --. . -, 4 '''• 14• ?' P N".r.;' , 1`.. : r; V, ... ,.. ,.., . .t 4,.,r,; ;* , 1 1, 1` •1 ..k.,` - ' ti"•• .'''•• ..2.,- • • •-• ••,-;.:0 :•--•.tr.c • • 2 rAk:,t . . . ' ": '''. * .. . ', iv ..ic.: .'''' {..- ' .. ' ..,:' ' i Z - '':V. V .,, 1., '1 * •`.) , " 4 ' , .. 4 ..... , '-'ti i, A Jrn l' X''''''" ' 1.' ' •:. - k - !,„P■ , . t )elta s ' ". '' .. ' . ' • * k , 'f 1,k. o' • ', fle.X.Z 41. ... . ' ' -, - , ...,6 , 9 4 .r.-.. vii.-.4,,.. • • ,-....,s • '.., Po • -. 1 )54■, 4r "l l '.4., ' Tvg• ■ . ' ' - . - :Et Ilt. .... • ",.., ig, .0 ,•,.„ ,,,,,,,, ... • • . . . . . . .. . . . . , . • • . .. 1 • , . - . • ' '' ''' ....' spring loaded, ''. ' force feed . hi-torque • •,....•. . • . .. .... .-.., . • • ' hinged . - .. .. crushing roll '...:•• hydraulic . .., , • ••••••••'/••.••;4 .-.. , motor •.. • : ' .." ''"--';'••:.••-- • back plate•: .... - •• •-•,, - - •••••-',. 1•`••••••••-••• ....z.:•-•.•••• • k • , ' ' 1...!;.• •; 1' . •••• 2 . , . . , :: •,• • • . ' • • . . ••.: .. t • .,.: • • . . '...--,' • '., "‘1.-• ... .1:.;:r:27.Cj*.,...; : f.'y,a2,. i 1 '; • ‘,..'7; Z 2 ":•••2 , c : ' • .‘ : , ..,■' e ,' ..,''' ,f .:%''', 7 ' • , . • '...: • . , ; . ' , . • :., :2 ' - • ::::'' ,. -: • • .. .. ..•' '• - ....'.::: nl' i• • ■ : :':: : . , ...li i2 i:•' - '■ -- ....•4 1•11■: ' L.e1".■::' 1 `•:."?.;: .:* .....‘' .. ',:. 1 ! : :'' .... • :: .1 . - - ,. . • : . • :.' • . • ' ' ....• .." ',• ".: ,,',' ' . ...'..;i,.f. ,.. ,'' . 0 ' .--. : 7 ' :'.'; ' .1.1 ` i • : :: - P . 1 ' . ‘ ''. i ' ..".....:-"' ' : . 2: ;. ''.. ' . ''; .i . • • .•,...: :,' ,■'; ,;,.. " :. ■• . , 7; . ..' .. % :: • !:,, ••,..1 : : _A .." ,.: ., . : .. , ' :- ..F:1. ...; ...'•:,:73*.:4::./.." . -.,•,...'...,` ; 4 , ..c.':: . ..t •:'.;'': 5 •.:::,;%';:' ;4: ";.;'' :;;':•-■ ; • ' •'' r .... : . :. %Z .: ':%;','": L.--2. • '' ' .......:!-.. ...;,■ 1 : . .:: :: . - : .; ; ;.,...- , 5 . ,;::. : r ; ...!i:;. ',II .... :.-• • ; -..-.. ..;.?;.'..,?:.-..-‘`;," ':•';;;'-'• .';',.' ...• .,.. ''' . 'i;: .7- - •21.;-,... --'• r•.? ,•':•,t : 1 ty--; :..- •,*•. •,,:•,...,,:e - •;;;,,,,: :.;.; ';,; '•;.; : (2.' •:•.,•'-'_-:*,:;, %.• :-, •.;:. '•,,-.• .". :. ; ...• • , • - ' :, • , .. • • .. • :,,y.' , $ • ,.' , 1." : •_' :;•••:'2.-. ' _••••-:.:-: ..:•••.• •::', *-.c.-:',-,.7......;.*:.-,..12.v::;:;• : 2<1 , := - x , •; - 1: ,, '''•, :, • 41 ,;si , ::::‘. -* 4f , ;:;f:11 , ...>;:k;-.' , -;,::::;, - •** ,- ,--;•-•;- ,- ;: -- : l';•:•••;.:` '.' .; ='::. i '•*; ! '..?:.",-.?•' ,-,'.,•• : ,';• • ';•:-;' ,.- ' s'z ;I r •-='--•;/- •,.., . -; „:„.5 . f,•,•.: 4,-!..i...{:- t r....,... 7 , .. , i• : - ,;, , .-Y•47,••••.a. , •;.::4 , -.. r ..„.•,....",, ..-1..- , -,...:!.. ti',..' r. ....7i.:•"..;. ,.:',..'• ; ;',; t‘,. Ps t . ..k -' ,..`.7.: • - ' ••""........, ... • -4•.,k/4' .-• ' ..... t...• "•. lir.'",".11.‘.e''‘',i7.P...!;-*`:iu;*:.*;,:•,;•.1•41'.H 4-.. . , .•'?" . ''''` :,7 ' ;,' u• -;..',": t, • .: 4- ,../.!...'4 .. .r.• % •''',. - 1.4 ...; '4, ^.• ', .• ■ 17...." .t : ..,..........A . .■t 4 .:;di.14 . .. 1- 5',..: 1...2, .:. - 1.:.";:::.''.1 - : 4' ? '.'.:1:::•.'n'.'.• 04' .....::- - '!" . ....1.7 - • , ...• ... - u . • -... _ • . .... • . • _ •• • .. ..., _ . . . ... , . ..... - _ ' .. • - pr .r. -ne. .—• r+are.-:-,•7-r'f5.:4 t. � "- y IX -�{ •' . 7 - • ...• , / . • 6+. :- -- t .. 4 " • :r:. .."477 j rr .•v . . b , i "�:'A. 4 p 4E."Y. """': l' t i' � V `- .•... r. r'' tr , . 1 T �y f �+�j+ f_____ w ,,... „ r i frr L7:rt..i' X t t 1 t+ p �r t • r vfp t ° Ga �} j . . � ■ r t '�. - .!4-,rC•�. i tc.c , J b -t c. µ lVd r to s, .- Y • pa 4... • �` � � n 3. l ^TfaL -4. � ..� .� »� 3 R r t h t � '�jFy, b t ���Y,r Wit. ":!):*7 ' '" r '1.1 l' ! N '''N ' k ck' /2 t.. "1 I 49.1 ',Sty. . . r q� Y°4 t ...,..:7.• �- ' y�i: ('kx •r.yJ � f 214' till ;, t ♦ca r r 5 r �Y k3� et,•r t tat 1 da .A 1.1; l • T •s '` "" 'tr•r:4. !� i 17;z r ) .4t- '4 Y.t l .p I , t 6'.f . 3i5. -'W t it' x, ,y� .. ��•�,,r ! 4. ti ' •ti y , `h .4 111 ,. '5 �� "' ?, t 4' , •C - ; .0,0 > •X S r w �; ; $ 'i k5 S�'% ,, s . . 4F, v• , 4 FU s`' q , ro `t „r p t k `S '"� ; •� ' i � 1�` ,, ear,,'. r,- 4 ,} ' - . .. . ' ,, r } .. • ? 1 r • t Ii s ♦ 'tit. rtTi`SYQ `�,. , a'• • q1 v 4: 1,-v' ! 7ts� t t ''.•:•:,'; y 1 i ti rp _ �yVti fr ; ,Mt .C1'•.: • it '1 - t t 1 •. :'1-'' 1 £ t r '4 Y i '� 4 Ll�j k t i i1�y i � rs * c"r �•�+ s �� .i� ; u r a, fl 2` 'cu't 1 vAr ;'1.‘I' 11:41`,... ', • .'. --- ..r 'f " . �..,. , yN d u+w/6 . ,- ..,, � ' As . /v C . �.1'A s, c S iyr f : R,., 1 t3 ^ t , r, ', egir X4'7 • 'I , • Ys 1 /1,5 , It' is p' r1 ' it 1 r • •• �� f ` 1 , : •t S. ti ti ' - ' - - 4 t•3 %' '',r / • 't .f''' J•tf TA''r � ''` r•4 L:a ''N i 1 ( ;Nit, 1t '141 d ' , d Ip r 3 , ; r 7 k � -. • t t ,�qq t,� , ,„ t Y ' 4,.. r •, it, ,N ! iN �n : , a :p• y T WV.141 „ r �, • � }} .."\ n r 1 1 ; rr. � 1 v � + � dY � H 1 � ' 1" " ® r ' 1) VI 4f. he 7 �s 1 s �'��'j , 1 . q'. -3 e: • I• t' r .u� Ir.' 4 ` �Y0.'� • 1 i.." , �- I j a� 1%.' ,.. • t (. E ;A4fi +aM' eyx:c' .tj or f a rn.� , aafJ' ti +,.; , .,r�.• `(p G Uses standard grader blades which you stock, no ROOT'S F5 SNO -BLADE is an under shoes, wheels, etc. truck scraper designed by the Pioneer . expressly for high speed snow remove • Plows snow to 10 depth. SNO -BLADE has a high 20" hi -ca G Moves with traffic at h speeds and eliminates steel moldboard using standard grader snow windrow. • ting edges with plenty of built -in sl cushion. c Keeps driveway plugging to a minimum in residen- tial areas. Installation time is reduced to a mum, it also can be removed from a t • No operator tra necessary. in 15 minutes dur the off season. G For the 1st time priced compet with a low cost SNO -BLADE can be used for 955 of front mounted snow plow. snow removal at less operating expense t r b �l 1 I E . — . . yj !la f °Il • . try , , r r t'' 2 kC� „4. t i t tt•r "�'' v 6 . r. 1. q 5 as 9 r - ��a. -`e . r I � .t: t 1 k to >::,ys 1' r ,fit reat , t,. • 1 i, - +"o1a,Y F `{ •. i ',** x ' r6 '.-.0;.• ' y 44.4 rR. - need co 4 wheel ® - ,.. I t :-. _ ,, . F. , :, �F : i r 4.x 4,a . :.; . 1 \ \6 4 a ,3A ,;. . ”' -_'-` rI t .l a'bOO�sr� �C -' '.. •�'- fir ,.., •• d rlive )7 ,„ .. / L 1 4 . 4 � ( q� t ;'S '* . ' . ' # r 1` • , 4.. S r , � � , .I, 1.r ice. r (� . .4 kj �� ,, � t 7,,,..t k - r t � �` !�' ��tir IT' -�e:Cl:l Yf3i 10:,,,,,,,. j _ 1 .T 4 1 jt f O931Jtt3' • 37E -J hr , , j „ 3} r - /�. s.iGf .t' z 'y } 4 y —� � ..- 4 -'4L E LL • . ,- a f - .2 - • .. .. . . ... i ... _...... . , ,., ,.. ........ . \-- .- /- --7 r ,..'.. - 1 j /7 / _ - .,. ! • A ; ... i , 4- 7 .i., ........ • C/ ( ;? (-,-"</ ..; , (-- "-- -...--.\./ • ' ... I REVERSIBLE TRIP MOLDBOARD . . : 1 1 . / : . . . • : ) . • ; . [ • • f ....- :' '..:./2.<1.!... With 10', 11 . or 12' ) I _ \ • -,' ....;.'f l'.:.' i • Moldboard . , . f : .. • . ...,... .. : , 1 i . . „ \ . .. • • • . ' 1 " •-,;,-, t4, — •4 $4›: 2 1›.. , n IrsTlet7,,I.r.r , .. ;- 1 t---. '..'cr,sr ,,. .mr... 4 ;•.r . • ..:.--,-, . •-e,,, - ---. - • ' •'-' - . ' it '''''' 1:i., , • t,'4", • ■ .. . I • ' t 1 - •... ii ' 4 nvi 's, .,•:::::.: •“.:. * - ; . r.''.,..f . -!, , t o , Iv • rof. . 1,?..,..;,91 i; t t . 4.21 . 1,....... -4....•.,... . ,14; . .. ., L ,.. • $ • ---..' :7%; ' ,.. •••• i•- ( • . 4 ,4f •,,:k.t • e. , ,.: . - • .• . - (../ . '-' -711a.li: , _..--. . • ••,:. . ,.....07,•%i; . - _ . -, .,, 0 .. .• .. )i 1:••. :',./.' - ;••i . 9. Ai - 10161N5403 : . 4..-.) • IIIir - - t+P. • . . • •• :.:.); • .,..j.' ‘ ..:1 ,- ..)1 . ..' i)%:.i ;21 ,!...' ZU : • ..li ,- ' 1 ''':!.)?... !! T• .; !":ril!t.)•;`1) . • • . . . . • 1.•,:s . ,, , .:) \'‘1, ( )1 , . • . ,. . • 'N•Lo .. . Nt ......,-. 1;14:.• i I ' t ,.. i.)' '.!:.' i'•'' • .:.'"; j .„. • ; •J ■ /:.1 . . . ..":. '.:' j '• ....,' ',.-_.:. 1.1 / '•_:`,- I ■:; :12.,24'....ti _ ... .. I . ■ . .1•5 - 1 0 3..).,!: • 1 I 2! 11 = 1 •1 . . . ' ' ■ ,. g?.. . . . .- ..„. . ........ .:..i.....t . . • • h cji.\ V.; \ t '.; 'a:\ Fi... : . :. :• .,: .. 11:r.)7••, 1: . -* • '• . • • • . • . 1. . i9 ' , 7 0' 'TT' ^- -.7, t .., • u ... . • - -; - • • .-. ...1..!! ......;;T:1, - :::ti, - . : . ; . . '''' ' ' -.):i; : ir ' • ii" :. )1" . • . . ::1....Y is. ••••--. s., - . -.: : 7,-. r.r.ri: 1 :7 r 11r: :f f . ' .-, . : ; . • ; - L. : . - D . 1 ' I 1: • • i: . • : • • - i: , ''''' ' • ., ..... ' ... ' !-.-.). ' 41; t r...:i' :7•17 ' . "•'--.17 0 ' 7.-;:. ,........ 1 :7, . • : .F.' . r : kr .,„ ::: -': •• -. -:,- . ''....: . ..;:ii:- . .7: - .5::.:qt:crli . • • -...• : .:. ;:./ ;;T:.; • - . • - ..1.+ tr. ....-- "ti 't...'•:_. '1.7r: :', :t; , ......... . '• • . • : • 't ■.. . ' . (I. , r i.i..• 'el; ' .....it- .. •:. ,...:••:: :,::. .... :1:. ....t._::„::,.. • , r.,, . L.' :.• v. :..• . . . •?,-1, - Ili - e. J., ‘.(-:"-. ::....::• • • ,-;' .:11 .. 21; : ....,.,:. ,...-: ,'...:: ;:"... i .0.0 :' '' -: • ' r 7, ...r 1 .., i.. .(..).. !• : • . . , i..., • , • ,...:.... ' ...• ,, . • ..: I); '..:.II'.' .:::.? ' ' '.. :1 11 . ;t:J/J/Z7 .. :......•• '• .'k.:11:•., •.,.• .• • , )-r', /r .,,.. . 7.1 ' ' • '/••••• •- . 4; v "• •...,....■ • 1%.: : "•'' -"-'' ...::$ - . ,I,:: ..".4....it. ...9•4. :' . , ' • . • • (:) : 113 • ( • • ." - . .. .... - • , .. -- • ......:•;... -- • . .,_ • •••% •,. , :.,... , • . !. ) :-.1 • Cll.? . ' .11 t) .• ' ' 0,1 r...) ..,..c!.t: :1 ..: " ••'-c) . .'.": 4 -4) :•;.• .1:1: .?- "-.. - ; -. .9! - :•,...",` ....'Hf:.),S. :3: ..'..:: • ": ':::',. .' , ' ,. ". .•*. a ... '; : i ,.. .e . , . -- " : 4 4; . '' 03 • 1:): • 1 - ' • • ?: . : :::: - .T. • .. •...;: , ..:.t)...:: ••••• 11 • ..:1;l . . ..- ... -,..- .. -• : • -!'il..) !' . 1 .1 ' . -:1;) ,I.:....1.) - ' ,.... 7', ., *:•:•..; . ., -■:':' : •'•' . i r.'''' - ' - 1 ." .) .- n:t) ' • ; '. .• ' ' . • ,': • . • '. 1:1,0 ' 1 I I, 4 i : !.:;',0 • . M ) • L t • 4...a4 -r:)::-• .'- ' 1): -',i 1 ,- . . . ., . ... . . ''s ' ' • - •''.(!) 1 .. 1 ...: • 1 -.....; ..U.:. [i1. - ., . . .. '1•1 7.,:./..i Ulli;_•," ...i.tii.;■; i',;:i.t51 ; , . • ... . ',. . • • • 7. - • . .... ... „. . . . . • . ' ....-. rr )-:'•1-1 .1 -°.). ,v . . ...v., . ). , - ■ '7: •- ' •s• -- - , - - 41 ri - 1 -. " r• . , 1 , .. I ..) ' 1,..?; ' : .' ' I ' • - , - ■ ..... ...14 _Li j,41.• • i..:. r :4(....,”,1::: .!...., t.L. k...: ...I .: ..s.: ,; '.. 1.:.• I, ...... , -• . A J.- ..d.:.,:_t .; ".:'.... 'IL ;.)..!:...:. .J.t... : ..3..... ,.4. - . ..:!,,. z • :1:,1•, •:•,.■.•,:t.i.O.r.; 1 i :„:-.: V ; ' :A •-. .-* -:;. 4:•:- /..., , ;•-•:4- 1 ,?. ? : ja: ' • ;14 .: ...;:e.)),:p :i.-.....!..• i ...,..!...1.=.!, , .., ; : ,• . : ' ' . • .., , ..;,. • ::. ' ..:•••, ,.; . ' ',..i."' ....:)''' •:. •I'- - - -y:T-5:i . :, ... •:" 01) ::,- cal) 7.-:1:,..?, )(:) • t)::,:ii ‘ ir •:01:i1.12"..:-. • 4 - ;••■r.t"..- ' '.....:, ''', . • .• 'i ; . . . ._ • . - Manufacturing Corporation - Waverly, Iowa 50677 - Telephone 319-352-5150. ",,::,..,::,',;,- .',.;:,...sn.:....,,.. .;..• ' ; st 0.75 , P,mled in U.S . • • ...!. ',. ,.. • . ..' j is Se : _ M.11.ysr' ftirr.N44 vicollCita, '•*". ,half ?.nietetit±4+r.OSttr iar;" - rr ?4 t;W"aktten iVAV ^sb'.tt+ASSttcyy ;evd!..i??1• t.sttft*Z?i.95:PtvAh ;r •4 k 4 " -R i£S"3e"S:la:d . )k}.ANI i �igd,' . 4, 4 50110 005 "t- Mt44 .F It33i13'aMtllb. ;'- ti" ° * ".4.0 V.Wto. - vnu.,.....,„ cHtYiNW?..r..au; rdn.. sna,..+tt4'r•F@ GMT(, 40.±N tieft•'1?FS ?.4.1/x . There is also a great advantage over front mounted models as it does not throw excess weight on the front axle, spring, and wheel bearing; but puts the weight where the truck is designed to carry the Toad. Mounting the wing attachments does not involve remov- al or attaching to front bumper. i ,, ill , ti .. t r u c t j to 1, l r �` f `. e ' ; Y'7' �.._ r r.� 1` Fj tiff /1 �i, I / s � d ' .S VIZ. . • . ./ .C' < T''� - S s`• � tr I (\ \ 4 n a ∎ t i , fa �rl t .d e r�� c ff t f t + li . 0 J+ 4 . t . P j 2/t it t c e t1i g s11)•` St/ F•' ■ e 9ts3 tA,5.'•Y > , ' jir.;• ¢ t 04V -2';A:'^.",.. T „, Y t l T r ) •11'2'r)�V,, Kct-T Tn.1 ./i • ,• . t2 7 \F j �9'Y p� V t ,u� 1 + +/r 7 u ? " fd �t a .c•`� k 3 Designed to either carry the wing at desired plowing height or to let it float. .] Height of either end of wing can be controlled from cab. Control of plowing position from 90 degrees to 30 de- , grees from cab. . Wing folds close to truck for clearing bridges, tans- porting, or storing. - ?,' . Attaching or removing wing requires very little time ... remove one pin, unlock latch, and telescope sliding push tube at wing. • •40 , .. = oir�a��its1%�' . _ ` �: r,( � ;+��.;�'�^�i.4�,NCUt�p�na�'�tat • • • .. ... ,. _ ,,� � � •:.: . • M1 LdiaN l<s °' tim*I'S:'• ".'614'- ''4,i'?N'4"'I' Fi tS {: ..01.tuistx> . ",-v ..-:•: ` 11g 4 I i? o o - torso lass • Scott -Caitu Jt 2eooite Coue, Corporate Officers: Sixth and Oak Wallace Ess - Chairperson CARVER, MINN. 55315 Chaska Margaret Brown - Vice Chairperson Phone: 448 Chaska • Sandra Lamb - Secretary /Treasurer COMMUNITY ACTION Jordan PROGRAM Mr. Judson L. Kenyon Executive Director August 18, 1980 • Doug Reeder, City Administrator City of Shakopee 502 E. 1st Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mr. Reeder: I have enclosed two (2) copies of a Cooperative Agreement between the City and SCEC, Inc. T would like to have the City consider • extending the use of the Eagle Creek Hall to SCEC for another year. The Thrift Shop project at the Hall has been one of the most successful volunteer projects aiding low- income citizens that SCEC has ever undertaken, and I feel quite confident that its on -going activities have assisted a great number of Shakopee area and Scott County residents meet their ever tightening economic pressures. This would be the third year of operation and although there have been periodic setbacks, the positive results far exceed the problems that have been encountered. The period of time that this Cooperative Agreement would cover would be June 1, 198Q thru May 30, 1981. A representative from SCEC will be on hand at your Council meeting to answer questions and /or concerns. I wish to thank you in advance for your assistance on this matter, plus relay—my thanks and the sincere appreciation of .all the SCEC staff to the City Council .for their generous contribution to Scott - Carver Economic Council, .Inc. the past 2 years. Sincerely, - f udson I. Ke T� xecutive Director JLK:af Enclosures: 2 An Equal Opportunity Employer" • COOPERATIVE ACI :EEMEN•1• FOR UTILIZATION OF EAGLE CREEK HALL CITY OF SHAKOPEE • AND • SCOTT- CARVER ECONOMIC COUNCIL T h i s Agreement entered into this 18th day of August • , 1980 between Scott- Carver Economic Council, Inc. (here - - after referred to as the Council), and the City of Shakopee,(here -in -after referred Lo as the City). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Council intends to undertake a program for the dis- bursement of Community Services Administration activities to improve the economic and social status of low- income eligible families and individuals, in the Counties of Scott and Carver. WHEREAS, the Council. wishes to utilize the building known as the' Eagle Creek Hall, Located at the intersections of 83 and 16, • for the purpose delivering such Community Services Administra- tion programs. State building is owned by the City. WHEREAS, the City has by resolution indicated its desire to participate in these Community Services Administration program activities, by making such building available from June 1, 1980 thru May 30, 1981. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1.• The Council shall provide direct administrative services • to Scott - Carver Economic Council staff located in the building for delivery of CSA program activities. 2. The Council will assume day to day repair and maintenance • of the building. This includes routine cleaning and monitoring of parking and surrounding outside areas to maintain an orderly and neat site. 3. The Council agrees to assume financial responsibility for utilities, telephone and refuse_removal. 4. The Council will carry adequate liability insurance coverage to hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees. S. The City will provide the building to the Council for a period from June 1,1980 to May :;n, 1981 at no cost to the Council, other than in the areas covered in items 2, 3 and 4 above. 6. The City will continue ground maintenance (snow removal and grading of road and lot) at no cost to the Council. 7. The City will assume all maintenance and repair to the facility which exceed $100 per individual case. Should the Council be deemed negligent in daily maintenance and repairs are thus necessitated because of such negligence the City will not be held liable for such repairs. • 9. The City retains the right to use building for elections or other public purposes as required and will give one weeks notice of such intended use by the City. 10. All matters, whether sounding in tort or in contract, relating to the validity, performance, or enforcement of the Agreement, shall be determined according to the laws of the State of Minnesota. 11.. If any term or provision of, the Agreement is finally judged by any court co be invalid, the remaining terms and pro - visions shall remain in full force and effect, and they shall be interpreted, performed and enforced as if said invalid provision did not appear herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year Ci.rst above written by their authorized representatives. City of Shakopee Scott - Carver Economic Council, Inc. BY BY Mayor Executive Director BY BY City Clerk Board Chairperson DATE DATE Approved as to form: City Attorney Date • • • • Cjr • MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Adminsitrator FROM: Gregg M. Voxland, Finance Director RE: Auditors Management Report DATE: August 28, 1980 Attached is the Management Report of the auditors retained by Council. The comments and recommendations they have made are very good and things I have been concerned about. Some of the sub items listed under number 3 (Purchasing System) are being done now or in essence are being done. In all other areas the re- strictions on improvements has been time and staffing. The.hopefull addition of a clerk in finance will help in some of these areas but not all. GMV /dac • ^ r ,v I e E t • JEROME JASPERS Crril/ied Public Accummm, 206 Scott Street AUG 1 8 1980 SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 CITY OF SHAKOPEE MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Augus t 15, 1980 Members of the City Council City of Shakopee Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 MANAGEMENT LETTER Dear Council Members: As we stated in our engagement letter dated October 16, 1979, an examination would be made of the accounting and other records of the City of Shakopee, for the purpose of expressing an opinion on your • financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1979. We also stated in our letter that at the conclusion of our examination, we would make separate recommendations for strengthening internal controls and improving operating procedures. We have now completed the examin- ation of your financial statements and at this time make the following recommendations to you. 1. Fixed Assets of the City of Shakopee We recommend that a detailed physicial inventory of the fixed assets be taken, which should include - a) description of property b) location c) date of acquisition d) original cost If the date of acquisition and original cost cannot be determined, then they should be estimated. This inventory should be updated at least annually to account for additions and dispositions during the year. Advantages to the City of this project would be - a) source of information for insurance purposes b) source of information for budgetory purposes. c) source of information for use in maintenance and safe - keeping • T 1': 2. Diversification of Duties A diversification of duties regarding the area of cash receipts, bank reconcilations, recording of transactions to the accounting system, and the depositing of receipts in the bank account, is not presently incorporated. While this is always a problem in offices with relatively few employees, we believe the following recommendations may improve the internal controls in these areas. a) the recording of transactions to the accounting system should be performed by a person unrelated to collection of cash receipts and bank deposits. b) monthly bank reconcilations should be entrusted to a person unrelated to the preparation of checks, cash receipts and bank deposits, and the recording of transactions to the accounting system 3. Purchasing System We recommend that • the City review its purchasing system for goods and improve upon the system by either centralizing the system or reorganizing the current system such that the depart- - ment heads report to the administration and the accounting department when an order is placed or received. a'well organized purchasing procedure is important to the City to insure that - a) the goods were actually received with a written evidence of delivery b) that the goods were what was ordered and paid for c) that the prices paid for the goods were no more than those shown in the related purchase orders, bids and contracts. d) that all discounts were taken e) that such purchases were not paid for more than once f) that the purchases were charged to proper appropriation accounts s• - 3. Purchasing System - continued g) that no expenditure was made in excess of the balance to the credit of the appropriation account to which it was chargeable. h) that the accounting department and adminstration have data available regarding outstanding orders and will be able to report to the City Council commitments made, along with the commitements already paid for at given reporting intervals. 4. Special - Assessment - Monthly Recording of Revenue and Expenditures We recommend that a monthly or quarterly review be made of the recording and classification of revenue and expenditures for the respective special assessment funds be made by appropriate city personnel. During the course of our examination, we have found this review is done at year end when the auditors are conducting their examination and generally the auditors are required to extend their auditing procedures to satisfy them- selves that the revenue and expenditures are correctly classified. We also recommend that an accounting hand book be designed giving direction to the person or persons recording transactions. Such a hand book can also be utilized for the other funds of the City. We will be pleased to discuss these recommendations with you further, -if you so desire. • We wish to thank you for the opportunity of serving you and we look forward to an enjoyable and continuing association in service to you. Yours truly, 4 A-�- .d•� 4=3- Ca JEROME J ERS JJ /gw • • • ! MEMO T0: Douglas S. Reeder, City Adminstrator FROM: Jeanne Andre, Administrative Assistant i RE: O'Dowd Lake Park Acquisition } DATE: August 27, 1980 For Fiscal Year 1980 the City of Shakopee has again received funding from LAWCON (land and Water Conservation) and LCMR (Legis- lative Commission on Minnesota Resources) for acquisition of addi- tional lakeshore property on O'Dowd Lake. The grant includes $50,000.00 in funds from the federal government (LAWCON) and $40,000.00 from the state (LCMR) and requires $40,000.00 in matching funds from the city of Shakopee, fora total expenditure of $130,000.00. " The original application stated that the City would acquire 4.6 acres, or lot 0 (remaining portion) through lot U with portion of CC (platted road) adjacent to these lots. (see attached map) An appraisal was conducted'on this parcel and the land was valued at $196,000.00. As the appraised value is far in excess of the approved grant amount, a meeting was held with the owners to con - sider an alternative acquisition. The following conditions were preliminarily accepted by the owners and should be approved by the City Council in order for the acquisition to proceed. 1. Acquisition of lot 0 (remaining portion) through Lot R with portion of CC adjacent to these lots (appraised value of these lots is $135,046.00). 2. Acquisition of tract CC adjacent to lot A through first half of lot 0. These lots are already owned by the City. The adjacent portion of CC (roadway) was to be acquired when and if tract DD was acquired. However the owners have agreed to transfer this prop- erty now. An appraisal on this property will need to be undertaken before the acquisition takes place. 3. Total purchase price of items 1 and 2 above would be $130,000:00 Item 1 is approximately 2.6 acres, item 2 is approximately 1.4 acres. Motion by Council: To acquire Lots 0, except the South 50 ft. thereof, P, Q and R and that part of Tract CC lying adjacent to Lots A through R inclusive, in RLS No. 47 Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota for the sum of $130,000.00 JA /dc 771 Activities Related To LAWCON Funding Fiscal Years 1980 and 1981 June 28, 1979 Submission of Preliminary Application for Fiscal Year 1980 LAWCON Funding. September, 1979 Invitation to submit final application for Fiscal Year 1980 LAWCON Funding. December 4, 1979 Resolution 1527 - Authorizing Filing Application and execution of contract for Fiscal Year 1980 LAWCON Funding. December 10, 1979 Submission of application for Fiscal Year 1980 LAWCON Funding. April 28, 1980 Submission of Preliminary Application for Fiscal Year 1981 LAWCON Funding. July, 1980 Invitation to submit final application for Fiscal Year 1981 LAWCON Funding. August, 1980 Received contract for Fiscal Year 1980 LAWCON Grant. • • ©' DSO cQ Lake- Pa r k. 77 1 c. ' ‘ ' N wit .— — _ _ —i I f 7 j i 1 ____ ___ ... 1..;1_. _ ___________ • . .,...______ _ .., _ ____ ___ . ._ _ ....; ,__ , , Jo s . 2_ _ _ _ • _ \v.., 1 ! ,,i . . _ ______ 1 ; : ,. • • , ,:i . • .... .... . h • ..1 i - .. • .,., .._. .. , N 1 i. MA.. tictiA11. e..F Al A PUP..( t Pror<rl - 7 Owns... i • 2I a • (14--..- •c „.... ..„ 1... ..- ' • .. VA:tit OR . • . \ . i. ._____:: . .. . : f1► 1 130a t • Mjs rc, 1 y ` y \ c % ,:i . 1... \ . • lip 1 ,----- A st , • )1 -- -- 146% dpi . : .,,, * s r. • C I *UCOD . .:...0.---■,,,, 4 ..... - . — \N- . - N Iva cf. C C.- '\ ''C_ i - 1 ..f ,... 7, 11- 11010, 11k"." - --- Lo(i. . (_____ .." \. .•••....,...•....... 0.001° Mill.) r 1 , ; j_ i • ( ) ..„-_,...„,,, j . i/ 1 r u..---------::, 1 \ / ------) • ....... - C - • - • ---7- T(' -- - -) ,.. ._••- .. • _.• . . : . 1) 5 _,______7z_____....•-.-___ ) . \\ • I // _ --_rte 1_ 1 ".- - \_..,- . ___. 1 --.---_,„.„-.-.„..,:t- • ,.. . . • • i Owned by City u5 of 8 -a7 - 80 . ! r Parczt5 4 b0 A9wro d or ; 5 1',,,A.,1 D,•p,h- 1 'rvpas41 i. Cji A- Pk3V'k4eh'vG kCqui's Til Dn RESOLUTION NO. 1692 %-() A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FILING OF APPLICATION FOR GRANT TO ACQUIRE AND DEVELOP OPEN SPACE UNDER THE PROVISION OF THE FEDERAL LAND AND WATER COMSERVATION FUND ACT AND THE STATE NATURAL RESOURCE FUND. WHEREAS, the land and Water Conservation Fund Act and the State Natural Resources Fund provides for the making of grants to assist local public bodies in the acquisition and development of outdoor recreation projects. WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee desires to acquire and develop certain land know as O'Dowd Lake Park, which land is to be held and used for permanent open space. WHEREAS, in order for the proposed project to be eligible for approval, there must be proof that it is part of a comprehensive outdoor recreation plan and 5 -year program (capital improvement); and WHEREAS; the City of Shakopee has an original or revised 5 -year action program which includes O'Dowd Lake Park; and WHEREAS, it is estimated that the cost of acquiring and developing said interest(s) shall be $100,000.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE: 1. That an application be made to the Office of Local and Urban Affairs of the State Planning Agency for a grant from the Land and Water Conservation Fund as amended in 1965 and to the Office of Local and Urban Affairs of the State Planning Agency for a grant from the Natural Resource Fund (Minnesota Law, 1979, Chapter 333, Section 31, Subdivision 3, paragraphs (j) and (k) for an amount presently estimated to be $50,000.00 and the applicant will pay the balance of the'cost from other funds avail- able to it. 2. That the City Administrator, City of Shakopee is hereby authorized and directed to execute and to file A) such application and B) the 5 -year action program with the State Planning Agency, Office of Local and Urban Affairs, and to provide additional information and furnish such documents as'may be requred by said Agency, to execute such contracts as are required by said Agency, and to act as the authorized correspondent of the applicant. 3. That the proposed acquisition and development is in accordance with plans for the allocation of land for open space uses, and that should said grant be made the applicant will acquire, develop and retain said land for use(s) designated in said application and approved by the Office of Local and Urban Affairs and the H.C.R.S. 1' • 4. That the United States of America and the State of Minnesota be, and they hereby are, assured of full compliance by the applicant with the regulations of the Department of the Interior, effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Adopted in . session of the City Council, the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of September, 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: • • City Administrator Approved as to form this day of September, 1980. • City Attorney • • • • • • • • • n - RESOLUTION NO. /67.3 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN WHEREAS, the City Council has given preliminary approval for the sale of certain property described herein at its regular meeting held on May 6, 1980; and WHEREAS, the sale price for Parcel A has been determined to be $48,972.00; and WHEREAS;E the sale price for Parcel B has been determined to be $3,157.00; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, that the City convey to Shakopee Countryside Recreation Center Associates, a Minnesota partnership all of its right, title and interest in and to Parcels A and B, legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Administrator be and same are hereby authorized and directed to execute such instruments as may be necessary to complete said conveyance. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee =EST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1980. Asst. City Attorney • pi Exhibit "A" { RESOLUTION NO. Page 1 of 2 PARCEL A .hat l,r:rt c.f .;!r :t:r, .:►,, Lot 4 and :). Section (•. o':i:.iii;, 11!-, . . ; . . i ;:innesot(r, •dc• :,critic :d ::s follows: Con .,cnciny at the intersection of the northerly r i ;);- of- t•:;ly line ! ,f High• :ay ,lo. 101 and the southerly extension of the west line of ,aid .':',� ! r: ►'_ ;• Lot 5; thence on an assumed bearing of North 79 degrees 17 minutes ',1 '.t•( rinds East along said northerly right -of -way line 270.79 feet; thence North 10 degrees 36 minutes 13 seconds West 294.60 feet; thence North 79 degrees 23 minutes 17 seconds.East 160.00 feet; thence North 9 degrees 36 minutes 05 seconds West to the intersection with a line drawn northeasterly, parallel with said northerly right -of -way of State Highway No. 101, from the northeast corner.of HALO l•Ir'T • ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof; said intersection l.einj the point of beginning of the 1 and to be descri bed; thence North 79 derir ees 17 minutes 51 seconds East, parallel with said northerly right.- of -' :ay line to thrp intersection with a line described as follows: Commencing at a point which is 1610.00 feet easterly of the east line: of Naumkeag Street, as measured along the center line of First Street • in Shakopee projected northeasterly, and also 75.00 feet northwesterly, as measured at right angles from said center line; thence northerly, parallel with said Naumkeag Street a distance of 310.00 feet; thence • westerly and parallel with said First Street a dist:nce of 180.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southerly and parallel with said Naumkeag Street a distance of 310.00 fpet ond there terminatingg. Thence North 11 degrees 03 07 'seconds West along the last described Line to the point ofbeginning of said line; thence North 79 degrees 17 minutes 51 seconds East parallel with said First Street to a line 73.00 feet westerly of and parallel with the east line of said Government Lot 5; thence North 0 degrees, 10 minutes 51 seconds East, parallel with said east line 63.30 feet; thence North 71 degrees 57 minutes 51 seconds East 76.85 feet to the east line of said Government Lot 5; thence North 0 degrees 10 minutes 51 seconds East along said east line to the waters edge of the Minnesota River; thence westerly along said waters edge to the intersection with a line described as follows: C at a point on the east line of previously mentioned Ndu :.4.1 :dq Street 889.00 feet northerly of the southwest corner. of Block 31, East Shakopee, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof; thence North 79 degrees 17 minutes 51 seconds East, parallel with the previously mentioned First Street 601.20 feet to the point of beginning of the line • to be described; thence North 11 degrees 03 minutes 07 seconds West', parallel with said Naumkeag Street to the waters edge of,said i•:innesota River and there terminating. Thence South 11 degrees 03 minutes 07 seconds East along the last described line to the point of beginning of said line; thence South '51 degrees 41 minutes 07 seconds East to the intersection with a line 100.00 feet westerly of and parallel with the east line of said Government Lot 4; thence South 0 degrees 04 minutes 06 seconds West along said parallel line to the northwest corner of HALO FIRST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof; thence South 68 degrees 20 minutes 48 seconds East along the northeasterly line of said HALO FIRST ADDITION to the intersection with a line described as follows: .1 .'•I _.(( r ion :,r t'il' ri :•r rl'!i!i-of-., : • State him;h:..,y 101 and the southerly extension of the t:c:'. 1 i►Ic: of said Govern :•,ent l.ot 5; thence North 79 degrees 17 minutes 51 seconds East, along. said northerly right -of -way line, 270.79 feet; thence North • .10 degrees 36 minutes 13 seconds West 294.60 feet; thence North 79 degrees 23 minutes 47 seconds East 160.00 feet; thence North 9 degrees 36 minutes . 05 seconds West 300.00 feet; thence South 81 degrees 45 minutes 03 seconds West 365.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 6 degrees 35 minutes 19 seconds West to the northeasterly line of said HALO FIRST ADDITION and there terminating. Thence North 6 "degrees 35 minutes 19 seconds East along the last described line to the point of beginning of said line; thence North 81 degrees 45 minutes 03 seconds East 365.00 feet; thence South 9 degrees 36 minutes 05 seconds East to said point of beginning. Exhibit "A" • RESOLUTION NO. Page 2 of 2 PARCEL B • That part of Government Lot 5, Section 6, Townshic 2 Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, described as _`c' 1 wz Commencing at the southwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 6; thence on an assumed bearing of. North 0 degrees 02 minutes 15 seconds West along the westerly line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of. 1276.84 feet to the northerly right -of -way line of State Highway No. 101; thence North 79 decrees 15 minutes 36 seconds East along said northerly right -of -way line a distance of 270.79 feet; thence North 10 degrees 38 minutes 28 seconds West a distance of 2 9 4 . 6 0 feet: to the point of b e g i n n i n g n of the land to be described; thence !:orth 79 degrees 21 minutes 32 seconds East distance of 160.00 feet; thence North 9 degrees 38 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 55.25 feet; thence South 79 • degrees 21 minutes 32 seconds West a distance of 248.62 feet to the intersection: with a line that bears North 68 dct;rocs 25 - minutes 12 seconds West from said ;uoint of beginning; thence South 68 decrees 25 • minutes 12 seconds East a distance of '103.61 feet to said point of beginning. • • • • • • • • y, RESOLUTION NO. / / Y A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN TO CURE POSSIBLE TITLE DEFECTS WHEREAS, The Plat of Halo Second Addition includes various re- ferences to deeded distances and measured distances; and WHEREAS, The differences in said distances may create questions of marketability of property previously transfered by the City to Halo Development, Inc.; and WHEREAS, The City Council has been fully advised in all things. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, that the City convey by Quit Claim Deed to Halo Development, Inc., its interest in the following described property: Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1, Halo Second Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Scott County, State of Minnesota. subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. BE IT FUR'T'HER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Admisistrator be and same are hereby authorized and directed to execute such instruments as may be necessary to complete said conveyance. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1980. • Mayor of the City of Shakopee AaT ST : City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1980. Ast. City Attorney 0 • MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder City Administrator FROM: H. R. Spurrier City Engineer RE: Improvement of S.T.H. No. 101 By Watermain DATE: August 29, 1980 • The City has received waivers of public hearing for the above - referenced project. Additionally all easement required for the work has been received. Shakopee Public Utilities Commission has not reviewed or received the Feasibility Report for this project. The Utility Commission will receive that report for their September 8th meeting. In order to expedite this project and make construction in 1980 feasible, plans and specifications should be authorized so that they may be complete for advertising by September 12, 1980, to facilitate construction during the 1980 construction season. A week delay in ordering plans and specifications could mean that the City would be unable to construct this project in 1980. • HRS / j iw • '+ _ , _ - • RESOLUTION NO. 1685 A Resolution Receiving A Report . Ordering An Improvement'And Preparation Of Plans And Specifications Trunk Watermain On S.T.H No. 101 80 -11 WHEREAS, pursuant, to Resolution No. 1679 of the City Council adopted August 26, 1980, a report has been prepared by William L . Price, Suburban Engineering, Inc., with reference to the improve- ment of S.T.H. No. 101 by watermain from the east line of Cretex Industrial Park lst Addition to the east line of Hall's lst Addition, received by the Council on ; and 4+ l r . WHEREAS, the Council has considered the improvement of said S.T.H. No. 101 in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improve- , .. i ment pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated cost of the improvement of $ _ and WHEREAS, the Council has received letters signed by all property = owners abutting said improvement waiving their right to public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Council has received all easements required for construction of the improvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvements are hereby ordered as proposed in the report. dated E. 2. William E. Price, Suburban Engineering, is hereby designated as the engineer for the improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. r.. 3. The work of this project is hereby designated as part of t:r the 1980 -11 Public Improvement Program. Adopted in 'session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1980. • Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1980. t . City Attorney r �" RESOLUTION NO. 1687 A Resolution Declaring Adequacy Of Petition • And Ordering Preparation Of Report Improvement Of Halo 2nd Addition 80 -10 WHEREAS, the Council has received a petition from property . , owners of Halo 2nd Addition; and WHEREAS; the Council has received letter from property owners abutting said improvements waiving their right to public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: certain petition requesting the improvement of Halo 2nd Addition by roadway, watermain and sanitary sewer is hereby declared to be signed by the required percentage of property owners affected thereby. The declaration is made in conformity to Minnestate State Statutes Section 429.035. 2. petition is hereby referred to. Henry R.Spurrier,'City Engirieer, and he is instructed to report to the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether proposed improvements are feasible, as to whether the proposed improvements should be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the proposed improvement as recommended. - Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1980. • Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City :Clerk Approved as to form this day df , 1980. • City Attorney 9 k • MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder City Administrator FROM: H. R. Spurrier City Engineer RE: Halo 2nd Addition - Feasibility Report DATE: August 29, 1980 Attached please find the Feasibility Report for Halo 2nd Addition. The report makes no mention of the possibility that those properties may be judged not to benefit in the amount of $34,167.00, therefore, it is most appropriate that Resolutions No. 1687, 1688, 1689 and 1690 be adopted in order to determine whether the assessment would be appealed by the property owners. According to this schedule, the hearing will be held October 7, 1980, the date that the contract would be awarded for construction of the improvements. 1 - HRS/ j iw Attachments A REPORT FOR HALO 2ND ADDITION DISCUSSION: Halo 2nd Addition is a proposed plat in Section 6, Township 115, Range 22. This plat is in the urban service area and will be served by roadway, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and watermain. The proposed improvements consist of grading, roadway construction, sanitary sewer service construction and watermain construction. The plans for the proposed project have been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. RECOMMENDATIONS: • The estimated cost of the project is $136,670.00 and a detailed estimate is enclosed herein. All of the proposed facilities are judged necessary for development of the lots in Halo 2nd Addition. Therefore, this project is judged to be feasible and is recommended for construction as described above. • ASSESSMENTS: The cost of the project is proposed to be assessed on the basis of a cost per lot as specified in the proposed Developer's Agreement for the Subdivision. The Developer's Agreement provides for payment of one and one -half times the assessment until the entire assessment is retired. The estimated cost per lot is • $34,167 • I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. • Date Registration No. 13689 August 29, 1980 ET 1'6'0 HALO 2ND ADDITION COST SUMMARY Total Estimated Construction Cost per James:R. Hill, Engineering Estimate $ 92,034.00 10 Percent Contingency 9,203.00 Subtotal $101,237.00 Technical Services, Bond Costs, Interest and Miscellaneous - 35 percent 35,433.00 Total $136,670.00 Cost Per Lot: • $136 = $34,167.50 • August 29, 1980 4 . RESOLUTION NO. 1688 • A Resolution Receiving A Report Ordering An Improvement And Preparation Of Plans And Specifications Halo 2nd Addition By Roadway, Watermain ;:Sanitary.Sewer -Service And Storm Sewer Construction 80 -10 f it WHEREAS p ursuant to No. 1687 of City Council adopted , a report has been prepared by Henry R.. Spurrier, City Engineer, with reference to the improvement of Halo 2nd Addition, r sewer service, { Addi io all roadway, sanitary se e s r ice, watermain and storm sewer construction, received by Council on and . z . WHEREAS, Council has considered the improvements of said Halo:2nd Addition in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Chapter 429 at the:eastimated cost of the improvements of $ ; and WHEREAS, the Council has received a letter dated signed by all property•owners in Halo 2nd Addition waiving their right.to a public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT,RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: l. Such improvements are hereby ordered as proposed in the report dated . R. Spurrier, City Engineer, is hereby designated as the engineer for the improvements. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvements. .•3.. The work of this project is hereby designated as part of the 1980 -10 Public Improvement Program. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: • City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1980. City Attorney } 7 2— RESOLUTION NO. 1689 A Resolution Approving Plans And Specifications A._-_. Ordering Advertisement For Bids Halo 2nd Addition 80 -10 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 1688 adopted by the City Council on , Henry R. Spurrier, City Engineer, has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of Halo 2nd Addition by roadway, sanitary sewer service,.watermain and storm sewer construction and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF.SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: .1. ..Such plans and, specifications, a copy of which is on file and of record in the office of the City Engineer, are hereby • approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in . the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved • plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Clerk until 10:30 AM on • October 3, 1980, at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 9:00 PM, or thereafter, on October 7, 1980, in the Council Chambers, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the order of the City of Shakopeefor not less than five (5 %) percent of the amount of the bid. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1980. • Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1980. City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 1690 A Resolution Declaring The Cost To Be Assessed And . _ ___._•____ Ordering The Preparation Of Proposed Assessment 80 -10 (Halo 2nd Addition) WHEREAS, the City Council has received a report estimating the cost of Halo 2nd Addition improvements; and WHEREAS, the estimated cost of such improvements is $ Ei and the estimated expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making i , � of such improvements amounts to $ ; so that the i3 total cost of improvements will be $ ; and WHEREAS, of this cost, the City will pay $ as its is .4 2 share'of the cost. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. The cost of such improvement to be specially assessed is herehy declared to be 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel or land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. That the City Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the City Council thereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: 1. That a hearing shall be held on the 7th day of October, 1980, in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 8:35 PM, or thereafter, to pass such proposed assessments and at such time and place all persons owning property afffected by such improvements and proposed assessments will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. • 2. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper of the Cityof Shakopee at least two weeks prior to the hearing and he shall state in the notice the total , cost of the improvements. Ile shall also cause mailed notice of such hearing to be given the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll notless than two weeks prior to the hearing. Adopted ,.in session of the City Council of the '.t;c: , 1980 • City of, Shakopee, Minnesota, held this _ day of i • , .: A, %b • l '!' ' . Mayor of the City of Shakopee 1 1 ATTEST : - `,, , . City Clerk j1 Approved as to form this day of'. . . . , 1980. 1 • City Attorney :':"-='? _ ; .. . . . . i , • MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder City Administrator FROM: Tim Keane City Planner • RE: Actions Taken by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals DATE: August 27, 1980 The following actions were taken by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals at their meeting of August 14, 1980. Public Hearing - Bor Son Corporation request for a 23.1 front yard setback Variance and a 20.2 foot front yard • setback Variance for two existing buildings to comply with Shakopee City Code for setback requirements (PC 80 -32V). Action: Board moved that the Variance be granted contingent' upon a letter of professional accountability as to how the error in building siting happened either from the contractor or the consulting engineering firm. • Public Hearing - Watson- Forsberg (Kmart Retail) request for a 214 square foot Sign Variance in order to erect a 414 square foot sign (PC '80-35V). • Action: Board moved to approve a temporary 214 square foot Variance for the sign and the time would be affixed that the sign must be replaced and /or conform to ordinance on or prior to November 15, 1980. jiw • Do YOU want to see a change in the Shakopee Downtown area? • DOWNTOWN BUSINESS PEOPLE • The Shakopee Area Chamber of Commerce is sponsoring a meeting for the DOWNTOWN BUSINESS PEOPLE with the City Administration on ' THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1980 at 6:15 PM at the School Board Meeting Room•at Central Elementary • WRITE I T D O W N N OW ON YOUR C A L E N D A R Let's get the ball rolling Let's see our downtown area improved. Let's get the customers downtown Shakopee. 1 YOU ARE THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS PERSON • What do YOU want done to improve the downtown area? We want YOU to discuss what can be improved. - : We need YOUR ideas''''' •• o • • MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder City Administrator . FROM: H. R. Spurrier City Engineer RE: Fee Schedule for Engineering Department • DATE: September 2, 1980 I have reviewed a fiscal year between July 1, 1979 and June 31, 1980, in order to determine what part of the Engineering Department activity is billable and what part is non - billable. Below I have tabulated the relative percent of billable and non - billable time for Engineering Staff. BILLABLE TIME Engineer 67.9. Tech III 65.2 Tech I and II 66.2 Secretary 10.3 Average (Engineer, Tech I, II & III) 66.4 Average (All) 55.2 Approximately 26 percent of the Engineering Department budget consists of non - billable activity. These activities include up- dating maps, responding to citizen inquiries and other items for which no payment is received. Operating on the premise that the billable time ought to sustain the Engineering Department,'I have proposed revised rates for the Engineering Department and Estimated Revenues based on the fiscal year of July 1, 1979 to June 31, 1980. I have also attached current fee schedules for two consultants presently working for the City and have noted in the margin comparable City categories. The proposed rates are well below rates charged by the privage sector. • • Douglas S. Reeder -2- September 2, 1980 t( PROPOSED RATES Engineer $27.00 /hour Tech III 20.50 /hour Tech II 19.75 /hour Tech I 14.00 /hour Secretary 12.00 /hour ESTIMATED.REVENUE (July 1, 1979 to June 31, 1980) Engineer $35,937 Tech III 25,020 • Tech II 24,678 Tech I 11,907 Secretary 2,157 TOTAL $99,699 HRS/ j iw Attachments Main Office 571.6066 • ' • ■ 1 °- maa f 6875 Highway No. 65 N. E. } (� McD1 EsErObe • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 7 - -- ----- - - -._._ ._ :: 11�1C. _ __ . :_.::::.: 1111. _ .. - - -• - _ . - - _. .. . _.. - 1111 - • --- •--- - - - - -- -- - ' South Office 890 -6510 • Civil, Municipal & Environmental Engineering 1101 Cliff Road al, 19 Land Surveying G Land Planning o Soil Testing Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 _LI FEE SCHEDULE FOR ENGINEERING & SURVEYING SERVICES Effective January 1, 1980 General Statement Due to the variation in complexity of engineering and surveying projects, • it is often impossible to determine in advance the exact time and effort that any project will require. Where fixed fees or percentage of con- struction cost fee are not agreed to in advance, all work will be done on an hourly basis in accordance with this schedule. Hourly Rates • 1. Principal Engineer •- -• - - ' - - - $45.00 /hour 2. Principal Surveyor -- - - - - - - $42.00 /hour 3. Senior Engineer - - - - - - $40.00 /hour 4. Project Engineer- - - - - - $26.00 - $36.00 /hour 5. • Surveyor- - - - - - - - - - $38.00 /hour 6. Planner - - - - - - - - - - $30.00 /hour 7. Desiyner- - - - - - - - - - $28.00 /hour 8. Engineering Aide II- - - - - - - $26.00 /hour - ' C 9. Engineering Aide I -- - - - - - - $23.00 /hour ` CT=c-3. C • 10. Draftsman /computer - •- - - - - - $26.00 /hour 11. Draftsman II - - - - - - - - $20.00 /hour 12. Draftsman I - -- - - - - - - $18.00 /hour 13. Draftsman Apprentice - - - - - - $13.00 /hour 14. Project Field Coordinator - - - - - $26.00 /hour 15. Project Field Representative - - , - - $22.00 /hour 16. 3 Man Survey Crew - - - - - - - $60.00 /hour 17. 2 Man Survey Crew - - - - - - - $48.00 /hour 18. Electronic Distance Measuring System - - $15.00 /hour 19. Clerical and Stenographic - - - - $15.00 /hour Ste. The above hourly rates include all normal expenses such as in -house • printing, field staking supplies, and vehicle operating cost in the • metropolitan area. In special cases with unusual expenses or for travel away from this area, there will be an additional charge for out of pocket expense. Rnllwt Mottle?. I441 11t9 . 171 IC.dlihun. 1641 Slop Wm 1 Mu e. lir•l 11.1 (;nu• li 1Imm•• 1641 our Pvt.., .l t I Iuui, . fi. ••1 11..1 Wm 1 .h•mrn. lf0l 11..1 Wdhunl .1 160.111•1tv Iiry 11.q 11 Wdhum I ,..i..1•., liry 'nur Ilan r rl I'ub•1•..n1 11%..1 111.1 Ii.Jn•1I 1 I iuul. li. y 1 I h.nun•. 1 17..u.lhu, . /i.•.1 1 ■.1 ..--. _. ... "Ti.. --.- - -. ♦ ... - 1111 w.. _ ... ........... .. .. .. 1111. .. .. .. .. 1111.. _..._...,........_ 111_1..- ...•...._...... -._.. . . WILLIAM D SCHOELL • CARLISLE MAOSON JACK T. VOSLER JAMES R. ORR )'a '; ��. HAROLD E. DAHLIN , , L+', LARRY L. HANSON ""�' ' �• =— "� RAYMOND J. JACKSON �k ", m. - SCHOELL Si f� A D S O f�! , INC. WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY ,' « ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS JACK E. GILL 'ly����� *4 ..; RODNEY B. GORDON THEODORE D. KEMNA JOHN W. EMOND (612) 938 -7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 KENNETH E. AOOLF WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT OFFICES AT HURON. SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS BRUCE C. SUNDING R. SCOTT HARRI (J C t u i c: 1' 16, 9 7 `' DENNIS W. SAARI GERALD L. BACKMAN City of Shakopee • c/o T• 1r. H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer 129 East First Street . Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Subject: Engineering Agreement • Gentlemen: Pursuant to your request, we herein list typical rates • for various personnel who would be working on Shakopee projects. 3-Man Survey Party $60„00 per hour Surveyor, in Office 28.00 per hour Senior Draftsman 25.00 per hour i"C-_C l • Junior Draftsman 15.50 per hour Chief Inspector 30.00 per Hour E-C� W ‘6 1 k - Senior Inspector 22.00 per hour' e -N Junior Inspector 17.50 per hour `T - Registered Engineer 31.75 pur hour el..)Ll1uEE atAZ) Clerical 19.00 per Hour We trust this is the information you desire. • Very truly yours, • SCHOELL 8: :•1A.JS0''' , INC. • JROrr:sg '