Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAugust 12, 1980 TENTATIVE AGENDA SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA ADJ.REG.SESSION AUGUST 12, 1980 Acting Mayor Reinke presiding 1] Roll Call at 5:00 P.M. 2] Joint Meeting with Shakopee Public Utilities a] Discussion of cost allocation for watermain oversizing 3] Recess at 6:00 P.M. for dinner 4] Reconvene at 7:30 P.M. 5] Discussion of 1981 City Goals 6] Other Business: 7] Adjourn to Tuesday, August 19, 1980 at 7:30 P.M. Douglas S. Reeder City Administrator • • / MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor & City Council FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator RE: Oversizing Costs DATE:' August 7, 1980 The purpose of this memo is to provide some suggestions which may be useful in your joint meeting with the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission on August 12th. A. Considering general policies of how to pay for oversizing costs I would make the following ob- servations: 1. ,A policy needs to be established which is applied uniformly in all cases. 2. The City should not attempt to assess any property owner for improvement or parts of improvements for which direct benefit can not be shown. 3. The water sy.stemshould be operated at a seperate fund and not supplemented with general fund taxes but rather funded by hookup changes, assessments and revenues • from sale• of water. B. Oversizing Costs 1. Everyone seems to agree that it costs more to install a large pipe than to install a small pipe. 2. The cost seems to increase because: A. Materials cost more.(valves, fittings and pipe) B. A wider and deeper hole must be made to bury a larger pipe. C. Restoration costs are higher because of the larger ditch. D. Larger equipment must be used for the larger pipe and deeper hole. 3. It is not practical or accurate to bid every project with a normal size pipe and an over- sized pipe in order to get the oversizing cost. 4. By comparing bids on different projects (even though they have some different characteristics) with different sized Memo To: Mayor and City Council From: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator Re: Oversizing Costs Date: August 7, 1980 Page -2- (B-4 continued) pipes it is possible to estimate the oversizing costs on a project. 5. It should be possible to agree on a gen- eral cost adjustment method to allocate the cost of oversizing to the water system in all projects rather than taking each oversizing project on a case by case basis. DSR /dac cc: Bo Spurrier • 44_7!"-z-- MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator RE: City Goals for 1981 DATE: July 11, 1980 Attached is the staff proposal for goals for the City of Shakopee. The goals are based on the following assigned definition of a goal. "goal" - a result you hope to achieve to eliminate a problem or meet a need These goals are therefore designed to meet what staff perceives as the needs of the City of Shakopee. These are broad general "motherhood and apple pie" type statements which will serve only as a basis to set objectives, set priorities, set short term action programs and to evaluate progress. The goal setting process, which the City Council could use to complete a system which results in prioritized objectives and specific action programs, is as follows: 1. Agree (by whatever method you feel comfortable) with a set of goals and sub goals. You can vote on each, as you receive them, trying to reach a consensus or simply throw out all those for which you can not reach a consensus. 2. After the goals and sub goals are set, you need to determine more specific types of action which will enable the City to reach the goals. You can call these objectives. 3. Once objectives are set they should be total prioritized. 4. After the objectives are prioritized by the City Council the staff can recommend and Council approve specific action programs. These will be part of the budget process. As an example of this process I have roughed out one area. GOAL - To keep the cost of government to Shakopee residents as low as possible and spread equally among the taxpayers. SUB GOAL - To encourage the development and expansion, of a high quality commercial and industrial tax base. OBJECTIVES - 1. Attract large companies to locate major office and manufacturing facilities in Shakopee 2. Attract small companies with growth potential to locate in Shakopee. 3. Attract motels and high quality restaurants. Page 2 4. Encourage expansion of existing industry in Shakopee. 5. Encourage a full time Chamber of Commerce staff. These objectives would be prioritized along with all the other objectives in each area and then staff would include in the budget process short term action programs to meet these objectives. Many of the goals and sub goals may result in the same or similar objectives and these could be consolidated before they were prioritized. I fear this process sounds long, difficult and complicated. It may be, -but hopefully as with the five year capital equipment list, each year we would have less to do to revise the goals and objectives. DSR:plk • • • • 1 GOALS FOR•THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE 1) To provide for the health, welfare and safety of Shakopee residents. 2) To keep the cost of government to Shakopee residents as low as possible and spread equally among the • taxpayers. 3) To provide the level of community services desired by the community. 4) To providea variety of high quality residential units for all family sizes and economic groups. 5) To provide recreational cultural and leisure time opportunities for Shakopee residents. 6) To protect the natural resources and natural amenities of Shakopee. 7) To ensure a well planned, economically viable community. 8) To provide a safe efficient and economic transportation system. 9) To coordinate all local efforts with neighboring commun- ities and the various levels of government. 10) To maintain a professional staff capable of seeking the public in an efficient manner. GOAL #1 TO ENSURE THE HEALTH WELFARE AND SAFETY OF SHAKOPEE RESIDENTS SUBGOALS 1) To maintain an updated effective natural disaster and evacutation plans. 2) To provide a well trained,• well equipped and efficient police force. 3) To provide a well trained, well equipped and efficient fire department. 4) To provide and maintain a good water supply for domestic use and fire protection. 5) To provide and maintain a good sanitary sewer system. 6) To provide an affective and efficient storm sewer system. 7) To ensure adequate health inspection of various commercial establishments. 8) To regulate the installation of septic systems and wells to insure the health of residents and protect the ground water supply. • • GOAL #2 TO KEEP THE COST OF GOVERNMENT TO SHAKOPEE RESIDENTS AS LOW AS POSSIBLE AND SPREAD EQUALLY AMONG THE TAXPAYERS SUBGOALS 1) To encourage the development and expansion of a high quality commercial industrial tax base. 2) To insure that all property in Shakopee and Scott County is valued fairly and equally for tax purposes. 3) To insure a high level of efficiency in all City departments: 4) To change directly, wherever possible, for its ser- vices provided to individual tax payers. 5) To . insure that the costs of government at all levels . are changed to the receiving tax payers. 6) To take full advantage of all grant programs to continue and expand the use of federal and state funding for needed programs and services. 7) To identify new revenue sources to support city services. 8) Seek energy savings and alternative energy sources for city vehicles and buildings. 9) Continue effort to repeal or modify the fiscal dis- parities law. GOAL #3 TO PROVIDE THE LEVEL OF COMMUNITY SERVICES DESIRED BY THE COMMUNITY SUBGOALS .1) To evaluate on a regular basis all city services provided to determine if the demand or need con- tinues to exist. 2) To analyze carefully all requestsfor new municipal services which are requested by citizens. 3) To coordinate with all levels of government to determine the best level of government to provide a required service and to avoid duplications. • � GOAL #4 TO PROVIDE A VARIETY OF HIGH QUALITY RESIDENTIAL LIVING UNITS FOR ALL FAMILY SIZES AND ALL ECONOMIC GROUPS SUBGOALS_ 1) Provide land zoned for all types of housing units. 2) Allow flexibility of design through planned unit development. 3) Utilize all available grants and development tools (such as tax increment) to work with potential de- velopment of residential units. 4) Streamline plattery procedures to insure rapid and efficient processing of plats. 5) Control surrounding land uses to insure a quality ' location for residential units. • 1 GOAL #5 • TO PROVIDE RECREATIONAL, CULTURAL AND LEISURE TIME OPPORTUNITIES FOR SHAKOPEE RESIDENTS SUBGOALS 1) To maintain and upgrade all existing recreational facilities 2) To plan for, and provide new recreational facilities as needed because of new growth or changing demands. 3) To provide programs for all age and interest groups. 4) To coordinate all facilities and programs with other public agencies (schools, churches, counties) 5) To encourage cultural events and activities. • • • • „ _ i GOAL #6 TO PROTECT THE NATURAL RESOURCES AND NATURAL AMENITIES OF SHAKOPEE SUBGOALS 1) To adopt and enforce regulations which will require consideration of natural resources for any development proposal. 2) To utilize zoning to protect natural features and agricultural areas. .3) To require in depth environmental studies for any excavation or mining proposals. • • • r • GOAL #7 TO ENSURE A WELL PLANNED, • ECONOMINCALLY VIABLE COMMUNITY SUBGOALS 1) Adopt and follow a comprehensive plan. 2) Implement economic analysis of all development proposals. • 3) Develop and implement a strategy to stablilize and further develop downtown Shakopee. 4) Plan to keep the character of the community devised by the residents. i • • • • a ' rs< a • • GOAL #8 TO PROVIDE A SAGE EFFICEINT AND ECONOMIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SUBGOALS 1) To provide for the transportation needs of all age and economic groups in Shakopee. 2) To provide main transit where feasible. 3) To provide an efficient, well maintained street system. 4) To analyze and develop alternative traffic solutions for downtown Shakopee, 5) To get a high level bridge built across the Minnesota River. k6) To ,get the Shakopee Bypass built. • • • GOAL #9 TO COORDINATE ALL LOCAL EFFORTS WITH NEIGHBORING COMMUNITIES AND THE VARIOUS LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT SUBGOALS 1) To maintain active City involvement in the decision making processes. of all levels of government. 2) To'work with neighboring communities on major projects and decisions of mutual concern. • • • • • GOAL #10 TO MAINTAIN A PROFESSIONAL STAFF CAPABLE OF SERVING THE PUBLIC IN AN EFFICIENT MANNER SUBGOALS 1) To encourage promotion from within - where possible. 2) To` encourage continual education for existing employees. 3) To recruit and retain professional employees for all positions. 4) To keep working conditions and compensation at a competitive level. • 1980 ADOPTEb: 7 -15 -80 e 2:r b r eueSe C GOALS FOR CITY OF SHAKOPEE Municipal Management System (MMS) (Listed in Order of Priority) • I. GENERAL A. Energy Conservation B. Insurance Review by Legal Staff for Proper Coverage C. Fiscal Disparities Lawsuit II. HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Continue to Sewer and Water Property for Future Home Development B. Seek Grants Where Possible C. III. TRANSPORTATION A. Buses B. Mopeds and Bicycles, if feasible 1 C. Conversion From Gas to Propane D. Street Reconstruction or Construction Priorities IV. LAW ENFORCEMENT A. Prepare Natural Disaster Plan B. Prepare Evacuation Plan C. V. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND MANPOWER A. Prepare Master Plan of Future Parks B. C. VI. ENVIRONMENTAL A. • B : C. • Goals for the City of Shakopee Page -2- VII. HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES A. B. C. VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL A. Tax Alignment with Rest of County B. Job Descriptions IX. COMMUNITY DIALOGUE (Responsiveness) A. B. C. X. COMMUNITY SERVICE IMPROVEMENT A. Golf Course B. Continue Efforts to get Mil]. Pond Cleaned C. Shakopee Bypass D. County Road 18 Bridge XI. MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT A. Method for Solving Problems and Goals B. Priorities to be Set C. Evaluate Results Before Setting Next Set of Goals XII. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND PERSONNEL IMPROVEMENT _A. Adhere to Council Resolution of Discipline B. Study New City Hall or Expansion C. XIII. FISCAL • A. Tax Alignment with Rest of County B. Retrenchment Policy for Loss of Funds (Recession - Long Range Study, General Fund of Expenditures & Revenues) C. • Dean Colgan GOALS A. Water restoration for re:;identinl, commercial an industrial usage in the City or 3hr,koocc,. B. Having escrow ccounts estab3ishe for sw water and street maintenance. C.- Making use of all Elie area that wolAd b available to the Senior Citizens at the ;:i,h D. Transportation for the senior ClLizen 1 41P:h Rise. E. Meet with different dew, in the City as often as 1 can such as Fire Department , Police Department and Utilities. • • F. MY personal goal is to corti=e to grow as a res Council:nan. EC Et yxan •r �� r �4"aaiii77T" MI AUG 61980 'HI 16 crn' OF SHAK0PF.E l eague of minnesota cities August 4, 1980 TO: Mayors, Managers and Clerks FROM: Donald A. Slater, Executive Director RE: Prcposed Bunting Project for LMC This is the most important letter which I have sent to you, that is, considering the League of Minnesota Cities as an institution, its future, and your own city's financial participation in the League. Let me encourage you as much as I can to review my letter, the attached materials, and give the matter serious consideration. The subject is a building for the League. When I arrived in Minnesota over two years ago, one of my fellow staff members handed me the real estate file and explained that the League almost bought a building two years before I came to Minnesota, but finally decided not to do it. Your Board of Directors, subsequently, reopened the question of permanent space for the League when the League renegotiated its lease and found a considerable jump in the rental price. A Board committee worked on this issue for two years. The committee reviewed a complete set of options, including, other rental space, lease purchase, purchase of . an existing building, and new construction. After careful consideration of the options, the committee concluded that, considering the St. Paul real estate market and the future of the League, new construction is the best course of action. ---- Mayor Harvey Lange of Robbinsdale put it this way, "If you think that the League is going to be around for twenty years, then it's foolish not to own the League's office space." That was the controlling view on the Board of Directors. For the long -term, there is no doubt of the wisdom of this view. If the League continues to rent space, it will, ultimately, pay more per year than the cost of owning a building and have nothing to show for the payments. Currently, the League spends roughly $60,000 a year for its space. This figure is going up sharply. Our landlord not only wants to increase rental for our space but also passes through excess real estate taxes, increased utility costs (over a base year), increased maintenance costs (over a base year), and wants to add a charge for parking space -- all of which would be subject to further future increases. Building a building -- which would give the League much more adequate space to serve the members' convenience -- would cost $1.2 million. Financed for twenty years, an annual debt amount is $130,000. The question is: Are the cities prepared to commit themselves to this course of action? There is no doubt that a building will cost more in the short run than continuing the present rental arrangement. After five years, however, the League will be.:saving. moneyevery year. (OVER) 300 hanover building, 480 cedar street, saint paul, minnesota 55101 C6123 222 -2881 QUESTIONS MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED ABOUT THE BUILDING PROGRAM During the Annual Conference, informational meetings were held for the delegates. The Building Committee gained valuable feedback from these meetings, and from discussions with individual city officials. Questions that were frequently asked are listed below along with the answers. 1) How much is rent now? What percent of the total LMC budget? The current rent for the League is going up sharply. In 1979 we paid a net of $52,000 for space. This includes a base cost of $7.15 per sq. ft., and a pass- through for additional taxes. Our new lease also establishes the policy of passing through additional maintenance and utility costs. (Rent costs for LMC have increased 35% in the last five years.) Current St. Paul rental property is $10 -14 per sq. ft. on the private market. This does not include parking. Parking spaces range from $25 -50 per stall per month. Both of these figures are subject to constant upward pressure. The architect estimates that current study indicates the cost of the League's new space would be $11.31 per sq. ft. (1980 dollars). Initially the cost of LMC space will be $1.31 over comparison rental rate of $10. This will be offset by the inflation of value of real estate and rental rates within two to three years. 2) Is there a financial return in building versus renting? With LMC owning its‘ own facilities we will have stabilized our rental costs and protected ourselves against inflation. LMC ownership provides total control of space and the cost of space. Cost of surface parking stalls not only provides convenient car access to members and staff but is 45% less costly than LMC is presently paying for parking stalls. LMC ownership will provide protection against inflating of open market rental rates while at the same time building equity for member cities. Savings realized by an earth - sheltered, energy- saving designed building will cut energy costs by 50% or more. Though initially the cost of space in the new building will be slightly higher than comparable rental space, the savings due to the building's energy features will actually make the cost of space less than that of comparable rental space within five years. 3) Has a space study been done for the future? Is the proposed building adequate for future needs? Who will use excess space? Will they contribute? A space study was conducted in 1976, 1978, and again this year. The study concluded the following: 1. 10,000 sq. ft. of usable space would be sufficient for LMC operations. (Presently we have 7,200 sq. ft.) 2. Meeting space is inadequate. 3. Location close to the Capitol with easy access for city officials is a necessity. (OVER) -3- RESOLUTION ON LEAGUE BUILDING WHEREAS, the League began consideration of building ownership in 1957 and appointed its first building committee in 1971; that committee as reconstituted in 1977 has now recommended that the League move to acquire a building to house the League operations; and WHEREAS, continued rental of space during periods of sustained inflation results;in Uncontrollable escalation in costs of space to house League operations; and WHEREAS, a preliminary financial plan has been presented to the members of the League at the Annual 1980 Business Meeting indicating the proposed financial commitment of League members to a League building, and showing the financial advantage of ownership; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: 1) The Board is supported by the members of the League in its efforts to obtain a League office building; and 2) It is recognized that the Board may need to develop an assessment program to finance this building which could include the three options recommended by the building committee or other proposals and could contemplate a constitutional amendment requiring payment as a condition of membership; and 3) The Board is further urged to conclude the acquisition of a League building as soon as practicable, • • (OVER) • -5- An alternative option that should be considered is to add the amount of debt retirement needed for each year to the annual dues of a city. This would be over the length of the bond issue (20 years). Cities would pay their proportionate share in relation to the amount of dues they presently pay. If the alternative option were selected by a large majority of the cities it would not be feasible to offer additional options. Member Cities Share: Using the same formula as the dues schedule, each city would pay to the building fund, $2 for each $1 it pays in dues. Examples $1 dues X $2.00 Share - $2.00 Building Fund Share $100 dues X $2.00 Share = $200.00 Building Fund Share $1,000 dues X $2.00 Share - $2,000.00:Buil.ding.Fund Share Examples with Options per $100 dues plus $200 Share Under lump sum option Pay full amount $200.00 • • Under five year option Pay principal and 10% interest in five annual payments of $52.76 $264.00 Under ten year option Pay principal and 10% interest in ten annual payments of $32.55 $326.00 Alternative Option building debt retirement as part of regular dues payment - An increase of 18 -20% in dues payment in 1981. This increase would then become the base dues amount. In addition to the amount increased for building costs, it would probably be necessary to increase the dues occasionally to maintain services. (OVER) OPINION SURVEY It is imperative that the League Board of Directors know each and every city's opinion as to the financing plan they favor. Please take a minute at your next council meeting to give us your opinion. PAYMENT OPTIONS 1) Our, city favors a one lump payment option (paid in first year). 2) Our city favors a five -year option plan; 5 equal annual payments of principal plus financing charges at 10 %. 3) Our city favors a te:1 -year option plan; 10 equal annual payments plus financing charges at 10 %. ALTERNATE PAYMENT OPTION 4) Our city prefers to assist in retiring the debt, reflected in increased dues (budget of LMC would be increased by the amount necessary for debt retirement). • Name of City: 1970 Population: Please return by August 25 to: League of Minnesota Cities 300 Hanover Building 480 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, Deputy City Clerk RE: Vacation of alley in Block One, East Shakopee Plat DATE: August 14, 1980 We have received a petition from the property owners abutting the alley in Block One of East Shakopee Plat requesting the vacation of the alley. I have checked with assessing and have verified that the proper number of property owners have signed the petition and it is a valid petition for the Council to consider the vacation. Action: Offer to adopt Resolution No. 1669, Initiating the Vacation of the Public Alley for Block One, East Shakopee Plat. JSC /dac 7 RESOLUTION NO. 1669 A RESOLUTION INITIATING THE VACATION OF THE PUBLIC ALLEY IN BLOCK ONE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF EAST SHAKOPEE, SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, A PETITION has been received by abutting property owners, requesting the vacation of the alley in Block One, East Shakopee Plat; and WHEREAS, It has been made to appear to the Shakopee City Council that the said alley serves no public.use or interest; and WHEREAS, A public hearing must'be had before such action can be taken and two weeks published and posted notice thereof must be given. NOW, * THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, That a hearing be held in the Council Chambers on the 16tli * day"of September, 1980 at 8:30 P.M., or thereafter, on the matter of* vacating the public alley in Block One, East Shakopee Plat, according to the plat thereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That two weeks' published notice be given by publication in theSHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS and posted notice be given by two weeks posting a copy of such notice on the bulletin board in the main floor of the Scott County Court House, on the bulletin board`in the Shakopee City Hall and on the bulletin board in the lobby ofthe'First National Bank of Shakopee. ). i s 'Adopted session of the Shakopee City Council held this '19th day of August, '1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Administrator Approved as to form this day ofAugust, 1980. City Attorney • ggafr MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: H. R. Spurrier • City Engineer RE: Holmes Street Trunk Storm Improvement District 80 -3 DATE: August 18, 1980 At the public meeting held March. 19, 1980, by the Holmes Street Ad Hoc Committee, the property owners were advised that the cost of the storm sewer trunk would be an estimated $507,900. The actual contract price amounted to $477,656., approximately $30,244.00 less than the original estimate. The property owners were advised that the estimated per square foot cost would be .04. ,The average assessment for an 8,500 square foot lot would be $340..00. Based on the actual construction cost and actual improvement district cost proposed for this project, the average .lot will . be assessed approximately $266.00... This amount is $74.00 less than the original estimate. The assessment rate is approximately $0.03122 /square foot. The assessments for curb and gutter and for utility services have not been computed since we must have final cost before assessing these facilities. Therefore, it is important to note THIS ASSESSMENT IS FOR STORM SEWER ONLY. The attached computation sheet shows the assessment calculation. HRS/ j iw . . Attachment • ~ J D HOLMES STREET ASSESSMENT Contract $477,656.00 Design 17,066.50 Inspection 30,000.00 Administration 4,776.56 Bond Cost 3,248.54 Interest 32,398.95 Total $565,146.55 Assess Half: $565,146:55' _ $282,573.28 2 Assessable Area: 5,926,522.02 square feet ---Residential 1,562,665.36 square feet Non- Residential • Assessment Rate:. $282, 573.28 . '282,1573.28 (5,926,522.02) + (2) (1,562,665:36)) 9,051,852.74 = $0.03121717599/square foot (142) (60) (0.031217) = $265.97 / r MEMO TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: H. R. Spurrier City Engineer RE: Reconstruction of Holmes Street Improvement District 80 -3 DATE: August 18, 1980 As of August 15, 1980, the status of the Holmes Street Reconstruction Project is as follows: Sanitary Sewermain -- 100 percent complete Watermain -- 75 percent complete Storm Sewermain -- 15 percent complete The contractor expects to be clear of. Trunk Highway 169.by.. Thursday, August 21st and expects.to.pave the intersections. at Fuller and Atwood by Friday,' August 22nd. The Railroad crossing has been rescheduled. for September 6, 1980. The storm sewer construction will proceed up Holmes'Street between 2nd Avenue and 7th Avenue. The segment between 1st and Fuller and 2nd and Holmes should be complete by'September 12th. It is anticipated that the grading. for the roadway reconstruction will begin sometime during the first part of September. HRS/ j iw� • RESOLUTION NO. 1670 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS • 1980 -3 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Holmes Street) • • WHEREAS, Pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council of the City of Shakopee met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessments of: Holmes Street - Trunk Storm Sewer NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:• 1. That such proposed assessments together with any amendments thereof, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein and each tract therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvements in the • amount of the assessments levied against it. 2. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1981, and shall bear interest at the rate of percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. •To the first installment shall be added the interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1981, and to each subsequent installment when due shall be added the interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accured • to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of this resolution; he may thereafter pay to the County Treasurer the installemtn and interest in process of collection on the current tax list, and he may pay the remaining principal balance of the assessment to the City Treasurer. - - ' ^ - 'e[s;ca_ruxavairerSk ,R. .c*...__:L „c_.,.. ♦ . . -..... • i - Resolution No. 1670 4. The Clerk shall file the assessment rolls pertaining to this assessment in his office and shall certify annually to the County Auditor on or before October 10th of each year the total • amount of installments and interest which are to become due in the following year on the assessment on each parcel of land included in the assessment roll. Adopted in _ session by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 19th day of August, 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee • ATTEST: • City Clerk Approved as to form this __ day of 1980. City Attorney • • • • NOTE:' State Fire Laws prohibit smoking in the auditorium!! March 19, 1980 HOLMES STREET AD HOC COMMITTEE PUBLIC MEETING We want to thank you for attending this meeting which we feel will be important for you and for this committee. The Shakopee City Council appointed this committee in order to make sure that every effort was made to put the people of Shakopee involved as much as possible in the design, construction and cost sharing of this project. Our purpose is to make a recommendation to the City Council on the following matters: • 1) Determine what improvements are needed. 2) Determine approximate costs. 3) Determine funding sources. It is our'hope tonight, that you will offer any suggestions you may have and that we can provide any additional information you may need. In order to keep this meeting going and to allow everyone wishing to speak an opportunity to do so, we request that you keep your initial comments to three minutes. If you have any additional comments, these can be made after everyone has had at least one opportunity to speak. Sincerely, Holmes Street Ad Hoc Committee: Ray Siebenaler, Chairman Ron Weiler Wm. Wermerskirchen, Sr. Gary Volding August Dellwo, Jr. James Groff Jim Raduenz Fred Kerber George Ries Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer DSR /jiw • • Attachments • r PROPOSED HOLMES STREET PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS WHAT IS PROPOSED STREET CONSTRUCTION a. Rebuild Holmes Street from 2nd Avenue to 10th Avenue to the same width of 44 feet removing where possible the dips. CURB AND GUTTER a. Replace all existing curbs and gutters on Holmes Street between 2nd Avenue and 10th Avenue. b. Construct curb and gutter where none now exists on Holmes Street between 2nd Avenue and 10th Avenue. SIDEWALK a. Replace all sidewalks, which need replacement, on Holmes Street between 2nd Avenue and 10th Avenue. b. Construct sidewalks on the East side of Holmes Street between 8th Avenue and 10th Avenue. WATER a. Construct a watermain from 2nd Avenue to 5th Avenue on Holmes Street. b. Construct a watermain on 2nd Avenue from Fuller to Holmes Street c. Construct a watermain on Fuller from 2nd Avenue to Levee Drive. SANITARY SEWER a. Replace all sanitary sewer lines in Holmes Street from 2nd Avenue to 10th Avenue. STORM SEWER a. Construct a storm sewer trunk line in Holmes Street from 2nd Avenue to 7th Avenue. b. Construct a storm sewer trunk line on 2nd Avenue from Holmes to Fuller. c. Construct a storm sewer trunk line on Fuller Street from '2nd Avenue to the Minnesota River.