HomeMy WebLinkAboutJuly 29, 1980 TENTATIVE AGENDA
ADJ.REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JULY 29, 1980
Mayor Harbeck presiding
1] Roll Call at 7:30 P.M. •
2] 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - $1,300,000.00 I.R. Bonds for Citizens
State Bank Building Company
3] 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - $800,000.00 I.R. Bonds for J. & B.
Enterprises
4] Award bids for Kmart fencing, Res. No. 1659
•
5] Res. No. 1655, Authorizing Condemnation Proceedings for the N2 of
Sec 8- 115 -22 Lateral Sanitary Sewer System (Hauer's Add'n.)
6] Res. No. 1656, Declaring The Cost to be Assessed and Ordering The
Preparation of Proposed Assessments 80 -2 (East View 1st Add'n.)
7] Res. No. 1657, Declaring The Cost to be Assessed and Ordering The ,
Preparation of Proposed Assessments 80 -3 (Holmes Street)
8] Res. No. 1654, Initiating Vacation of that Part of Minnesota Street
Herein Described and Fixing A Time and Place For A Public Hearing
on The Proposed Vacation
9] Assessment Roll for 79 -1 Park Ridge Drive .
10] Assessment Roll for 79 -7 CR -83 Utilities
11] 1981 Goals
12] Capital Items Budget List' •
13] Other Business:
a] 3.2 Beer License for Brooks Superette, Inc. - 615 Gorman,tbld 6/24
b]
c]
14] Adjourn.
•
Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
UPCOMING MEETINGS:
Aug. 5th - Reg. Meeting + Assessment Hearings on Park Ridge Drive &
CR -83; Council adopts 1981 City Goals; Preliminary Budget Hearing
Aug. 19th - Reg. Meeting + Assessment Hearings on Holmes St. & East
View 1st; Council approves capital items list
Aug. 26th - Special Budget Meeting
MEMO•
•
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Citizens State Bank
Industrial Revenue Bonds
DATE: July 23, 1980
•
The Citizens State Bank has requested that the
City of Shakopee increase the .amount of the Industrial
Revenue Bond authorized for the construction of the
bank building from the previously approved $900,000
to $1,300,000. The increase is requested because of
increase in construction costs not previously anticipated.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve
the revised application and adopt the attached pre-
liminary resolution.
•
DSR /dac
•
RESOLUTION NO. 1658
RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A
PROJECT UNDER THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT ACT, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF
AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF SAID PROJECT TO
THE COPM4ISSIONER OF SECURITIES, AND AUTHORIZING
THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND
MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH SAID PROJECT
WHEREAS,
(a) The City Council has received from Citizens
Bank Building Company, a Minnesota general partnership (the
"Borrower ") a proposal that the City finance a project for
purposes consistent with Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes,
known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act
• (the "Act ") consisting of the construction on certain land
located in the City of a 15,000 square foot, three -level
building (the "Project ") to be leased to the Citizens State
Bank of Shakopee for use as a retail banking facility (base-
ment and first floor) and to other businesses for general
office use .(second floor).
(b) The Project would aid and assist the City, and
the full faith and credit of the City would not be pledged or
be responsible in connection with said Project.
(c) The City has been advised by the Borrower that
conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital cost of
undertaking the Project is available only at such costs of
borrowing that the economic feasibility of undertaking the
Project would be reduced, but the Borrower has also advised
this Council that with the aid of municipal financing and its
resulting low borrowing cost, the Project is economically
enhanced.
(d) The Council has held a public hearing on the
City's undertaking the financing of the Project on July 29,'
1980, at which hearing all residents and interested persons
were afforded an opportunity to express their views and to be
heard by the Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Shakopee, as follows:
Section 1. Policy and Purpose. On the basis of infor-
mation provided to this Council it appears, and the Council
hereby finds, that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will
be to increase the general level of economic activity in the
City and surrounding areas, to increase the property tax base
in the City, and to increase current employment opportunities
for residents of the City and surrounding area, all to the
benefit of the residents of the City and the State of Minnesota.
Section 2. Authorization.
(1) The Council hereby approves the proposal of the
Borrower that the City undertake to provide financing for the
Project pursuant to the Act by acquisition of the Project to
be leased or sold by the City to the Borrower, or by direct
loans of the bond or note proceeds to the Borrower, all upon
such terms and conditions as mutually agreed upon by the City,
the Borrower and the purchaser of the bonds or notes (whom the
City reserves the right .to approve) with provisions for revision
from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and
revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and
interest on bonds or notes of the City to be issued pursuant
to the Act to finance said Project.
(2) The Project is hereby given preliminary approval
by the City. The City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue
its revenue obligation(s), in one or more series, in an amount
necessary for partial payment of the costs of the Project, in
the approximate amount of $1,300,000.
•
(3) The Mayor and City Clerk- Administrator are hereby
authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the above
described Project to the Commissioner of Securities requesting
her approval.
(4) The City and Dorsey, Windhorst, Hannaford,
Whitney & Halladay, bond counsel to the City, are authorized
to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents
relating to the Project, and to consult with the Borrower and the
purchaser of the bonds or notes as to the maturities, interest
rates and other terms and provisions of the bonds and the cove-
nants and other provisions of the necessary documents, and to
submit such documents to the Council for final approval.
Section 3. No Liability of City. Nothing in this
resolution or in the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall
authorize the expenditure of any funds on the Project other
than the revenues thereof or the proceeds of the bonds authorized
by the City herein. The bonds shall not constitute a charge,
lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or
funds of the City except the Project and the revenue pledged to
the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any
liability thereon. No bondholder shall ever have the right
to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City
to pay any such bonds or the interest thereon,
•
•
nor to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City
except the Project. Each bond shall recite in substance that
the bond, including interest thereon, is payable solely from
the revenue pledged to the payment thereof. No bond issued
hereunder shall constitute a debt of the City within the meaning
of any. constitutional or statutory limitation.
Section 4. Project Expenditures. In anticipation of
the approval by the Commissioner of Securities and the issuance
of revenue bonds to finance the Project, and in order that
completion of the Project will not be unduly delayed when approved,
the Borrower is hereby authorized to make such expenditures
and advances toward payment of costs of the Project as it
considers necessary, including the use of interim, short -
term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of
the revenue bonds when delivered, but otherwise without
liability on the part of the City.
Adopted in Adj. Reg. Session of the City Council of the City
of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 29th day of July, 1980.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Administrator
Approved as to form this day
of , 1980.
City Attorney
•
, •
• , V
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council;
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: J & B Enterprise IR Bonds
DATE: July 23, 1980
Attached is the amended application for J & B Enterprise
I.R. Bonds. The Council has previously given preliminary
approval of this project for I.R. Bonds in the amount of
,$850,000. The main changes in the application are as follows:
1. Location has been changed from a newly platted watered
• and sewered lot in the industrial part to a 7 acre lot
t in Patch Addition on County Road 83 which does' not have
City water or sewer.
2. The amount of I.R. Bond authorization has been changed
from $800,000 to $600,000.
3. The building proposed has been decreased in value and
possibly in size.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the revised application be denied
for the following reasons.
1. The project is not compatible with the overall devel-
opment plans and objectives of the City and bf the
neighborhood in which the project lies.
2. The project is not of the nature that the City wishes
to attract because of the location which causes a
potential for the premature extension of municipal
services to an acre not now serviced nor contemplated
to be serviced.
If the Council wishes to deny the application the appropriate
action would be to request staff to draw up a resolution of denial
for the next meeting with the specific reasons for denial.
Note
It can and will be argued that the City Council has previously
issued Industrial Revenue Bonds for Ziegler and that they are in a
1 Memo'to Mayor and City Council 3
Page -2-
similar circumstance. I would make the following observations.
1. Ziegler was previously located in Shakopee at the
same location and were expanding.
2. The number of new employees was substantially larger
for Ziegler.
3. Water was contemplated to service the area along major
highway before the area along County Road 83, and in
fact will probably be installed within the next 9
months.
4. The location of Ziegler on the major transportation
corridor reduces the need for new munincipal services.
DSR /dac
RFCE
• JUL 18 1580
•
CITY OF SHAKOPEE are OF SHAKOPEE
AMENDED APPLICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS
Date: July 9, 1980
Applicant Name: J. & B. Enterprises
Address: 12420 Glendale Drive, Savage, Minnesota
Phone: 894 -7720, 920 -5554 (Thomas L. Steffens, Attorney)
Location of Proposed Project (address and legal description):
Lot 2, Block 1, Patch First Addition to the City of Shakopee
1. Specific Proposed use of the facility.
The proposed facility will be leased by Mastercraft Dump Bodies, Inc. and
Northwest'Asphalt, Inc. Mastercraft is engaged in the manufacture,
repair and sales of truck dump bodies and truck equipment. Northwest
is engaged in the paving of streets and parking lots.
2. A list of all of their facilities owned or operated by the applicant.
J. & B. Enterprises does not presently own or operate any other facilities.
However, Mastercraft Dump Bodies, Inc. currently operates a facility at
7213 West 128th Street, Savage, Minnesota, and Northwest Asphalt, Inc.
currently operates a shop facility at 7218 West 128th Street, Savage,
Minnesota.
3. How many new people will be employed in Shakopee as a direct result of
this project?
Mastercraft Dump Bodies, Inc. currently employs 20 people. It is expected
that this company will employ 30 -35 people after the facility is completed.
Northwest Asphalt, Inc. currently employs 50 people. It is expected that
this company will employe 60 -65 people after the facility is completed.
4. What is the proposed date for start of construction? Completion of
construction?
Construction is expected to commence on August 11, 1980 and will be completed
by approximately December 1, 1980.
5. The estimate cost of the facility classified by:
a) Building construction 457,000
CE V D,
JUL 1 8 1980
b) Furnishings or non -fixed equipment 85,000
c) Land acquisition 112,000 CITY OF SH, KOPEE
d) Property development 87,000
e) Professional fees
1) Architectural engineering 15,000
2) Legal 15,000
3) Fiscal 5,000
f) Other (detail)
Interest during construction 20,000
Bond Discount 16,000
Contingency 10,000
•
822,000
•
6. Applicant's legal interest in the land.
J. & B. Enterprises will own the land in fee simple.
7. Audited financial statements of the corporation for the immediate past three
years.
Although the applicant is J. & B. Enterprises, the lessees of the facility
will be Mastercraft Dump Bodies, Inc. and Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Income
tax returns for Mastercraft's first two fiscal years ending April 30, 1976
and April 30,'1977 and financial statements for the fiscal years ending
April 30, 1978 and 1979, together with a statement reflecting operations
for the first two quarters of the current fiscal year were previously
submitted with the previous application.. Northwest Asphalt, Inc.'s
financial statements for the fiscal years ended November 30, 1978 and 1979
are attached as Exhibits A -6 and A -7.
8. A description of the corporation, including a resume of owners if privately
held, or a resume of major officers and the board of directors of publicly
held corporations.
J. & B. Enterprises is a General Partnership engaged in the business of
ownership, management and leasing of real estate. The parties in J. & B.
Enterprises are James Aamodt and L.P.V. Enterprises.
Mr. Aamodt is currently the President of Mastercraft Dump Bodies, Inc., a
company engaged in the manufacture, repair and sale of truck equipment.-
Prior to his present position, Mr. Aamodt was truck sales manager for Towns
Edge Ford from 1971 - 1979 and truck sales manager for Shakopee Ford from
1968 - 1971.
Vii
JUL 18 1280
L.P.V. Enterprises is a Minnesota partnership, the partners of which are
Jack Van Remortel, Don Pfeiffer and Clayton Larson. Mr. OrivaErITAKOPEEE
President of Northwest Asphalt, Inc. and President of West Suburban
Utility Contractors, Inc. West Suburban is engaged in the business of
street and highway excavating and paving. Mr. Pfeiffer is Vice - President
• of West Suburban and Secretary- Treasurer of Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Prior
- to being associated with these companies, Mr. Pfeiffer was involved for
twenty years in the highway construction industry. Mr. Larson is Vice -
President of Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Prior to this position, Mr. Larson
was a Paving Superintendent for twenty years with Northwest Bituminous
Company.
One lessee of the proposed facility is Mastercraft Dump Bodies, Inc. which
is a Minnesota corporation presently doing business in Savage. Master -
craft manufactures, repairs, and sells truck dump bodies and truck
equipment. Although Mastercraft's primary market is the upper midwest, it
sells custom equipment to companies nation wide. Mastercraft is wholly
owned by Mr. Aamodt.
The other lessee of the proposed facility is Northwest Asphalt, Inc. which
is a Minnesota corporation presently operating a shop facility at 7218
West 128th Street, Savage; Minnesota, and an office facility at 10185
Crosstown Circle, Eden Prairie. Northwest is engaged in the business of
paving streets and parking lots for both commercial enterprises and
government.
9. If interim construction financing is required, a commitment for such financing
from a reputable lender.
A written interim construction financing commitment will be furnished upon
request.
.10. A statement as to the final financing vehicle as to whether the instrument
should be bonds, mortgage revenue notes, or unsecured debt.
Permanent financing of the proposed project will be provided by the sale of
mortgage revenue notes.
•
11. Method of payment to the City of all public cost.
J. & B. Enterprises will reimburse the City for any costs incurred.
12. The resume of the underwriters including a listing of five other comparable
offerings which have been placed with the underwriter.
It is expected that the Towle Company will underwrite the sale of Industrial
Revenue Bonds. A resume of this company has been filed with the City of
Shakopee.
13. A listing of all other corporate debt by amount, date of obligation, annual
required payments, obligee, and type of security.
J. & B. Enterprises currently has no corporate debt. The corporate debt
•
•
4ir"
J U L 18 1.930
of Mastercraft Dump Bodies, Inc. was attached to the ,.ig'.A1,,u,1 ign.
The only debt of L.P.U. is a contract for deed on the ;9r e t WW.e e
proposed project will be built. It is expected that this debt will'be
extinguished at or before the time permanent financing is secured.
1 i/ /
Thorns L. Steffens?
6 Attorney` for J. B. Enterprises
(Date)
•
•
MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: J & B Enterprises
RE: I.R. Bond Application with City of Shakopee
DATE: July 24, 1980
Following a meeting with Douglas S. Reeder where we discussed the
J & B Industrial Revenue Bond Application, it was felt that additional
information regarding the J & B application should be communicated to the
members of the City Council.
1. Mastercraft Truck & Equipment, one of the lessees of the proposed
facilities must vacate its present location by 12/1/80. The original plan
to locate in the Industrial Park had to be abandoned due to the
unavailability of financing; the Purchase Agreement for the industrial
park has been cancelled.
2. Secondly, L.P.V. was added as a partner due to the fact that it
owns the subject site which is already properly zoned and was purchased
for that reason. L.P.V. through the ownership of the land and the financial
strength of its partners made the proposed development financially viable
if an industrial revenue bond is approved.
3. Due to the foregoing points, Mastercraft will be forced to're-
locate its facilities due to the fact that no adequate rental facilities
are available and it will be impossible for Mastercraft to finance its
own building in the industrial park.
4. Referring to Mr. Reeder's recommendation #2, it should be pointed
out that neither tenant will use water and Sewer facilities beyond normal
employee consumption and lavatory use. Further, adequate septic systems
are included in the plans.
5. The City will not be setting an unfavorable precedent in approving
the application in that:
a] Ziegler, an entity which may not have needed the benefit of
an I.R. Bond was provided with one in the same vicinity as the propos-
ed development
b] In this case the applicant was already approved once, and
therefore this application, if approved, can be distinguished from
any future applicant seeking to locate in this area
6. In all likelihood, at such time as additional equity can be raised,
the applicant will proceed with construction and the objections referred
to in Mr. Reeder's Recommendations will exist in any event. With this
in mind, we question why the City would force the businesses involved to
J & B Enterprises Bond Application
July 24, 1980
Page -2-
bear a heavier burden of interest costs, which translates into higher tenant
rentals and threatens the future profitability of the businesses.
7. In closing, we also wish to re- iterate that the businesses
involved are of the•type Mr. Reeder says the City wishes to attract.
Approximately 75 to 100 new employees will be working in Shakopee, many
of whom may decide to relocate to Shakopee once they realize these facilities
are to be permanent for the respective companies. Existing retailers and
area businesses would obviously benefit from the increased traffic.
James H. Aamodt, President
Mastercraft Truck & Equipment, Inc.
Jack Van Remortel, President
Northwest Asphalt, Inc.
jc
•
� 1
MEMO
•
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Kmart Fence
DATE: July 23, 1980
The bids for the Kmart Fence will be opened
on Tuesday July 29th. We will have the bid
tabul atiou available at the Council .meeting.
DSR /dac
•
RESOLUTION N0. 1659
A RESOLUTION AWARDING BIDS FOR KMART FENCING
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Kmart Fencing
on Lot 1, Block 1, Valley Park Third Addition, bids were received,
opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were
received complying with the advertisement:
Century Fence Company $
Security Fencing $
Crowley Fence Company, Inc. $
Able Fence
Ganz Fencing
Fenc- Company, Inc. $
Midwest Fence & Manufacturing Company $
Ideal Enterprises," Inc. $
AND WHEREAS, it appears that
is the lowest responsible bidder,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter
into the attached contract with in the
name of the City of Shakopee for the Kmart Warehouse Fencing according
to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council
and on file in the office of the City Clerk, provided, however, that
said contract shall not be entered into until Kmart and the general
contractor have read, agreed to and ratified the attached contract.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return
forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that
the deposits, of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall
be retained until a contract has been signed.
1
Adopted in session of the City Council of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this __clay of , 1980.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved at to form this
day of • , 1980
• City Attorney
•
•
•
•
•
1'
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Kmart Tax Increment Project
DATE: July 22, 1980
The Kmart Tax Increment Project is by all measurements moving
ahead as planned. There is some delay in construction schedule and
some increase in .funds available, however, it is generally on schedule.
We reported to the City Council in April that there would be a
cash shortage in May of 1980 of some $36,000 if all of the projects
proceeded on the schedule which the individual project proponents
indicated that they desired. After reviewing that schedule and
discussing with Kmart their schedule, we were able to develop a
schedule in which Kmart agreed not to increase expenses before
certain dates and the construction of the well and watermain were
still scheduled for the summer of 1980.
At this time the current status of the project is this:
Kmart Site Improvements - $1,820,000.00
Paid to date for Improvements - 1,485,707.58
Remaining to be paid on existing contracts 50,000.00
Total Obligated.- • $1,535,707'.58
Estimated cost of fence contract - $ 100,000.00
Estimated total obligated with fence - . $1,635,707.58
Estimated remaining unobligated money
pledged to Kmart $ 184,292.42
Off Site Improvements - $1,901,400.00
Paid to date for improvements - 811,271.79
Remaining to be paid on existing contracts - 250,436.00
Total obligated - $1,061,707.79
Estimated costs.to complete tank $ 16,000.00
Estimated cost of well 248,000.00
Estimated cost of watermain 354,000.00
Estimated cost of County Road 83 200,000.00
4
Memo to Mayor and City Council
' Page -2-
Off Site Improvements Continued:
Total estimated cost of remaining projects - $ 818,000.00
Total programmed with all projects - $1,879,708.00
Estimated remaining unobligated money
for off site improvements - 21,692.00
Note: City costs to come out of here.
In addition to the exependitures listed above, $62,595 is due
to the City of Shakopee and will be paid in August of 1981. This is
to cover staff costs and will go to the general funds. This is in-
cluded in the cash flow projection. An additional $8,000 is also due
to the City for our share of the cost of issuance of the bonds. This
cost will also be paid in August of 1981.
From the above it is apparent that as far as the principle amounts
for both funds there is sufficient money remaining to complete the work
contemplated as long as the estimates are good. For the Kmart on site
improvements the $1,820,000 is our absolute tops and will not be exceeded.
We will know • how good the estimates for the well and watermain are
and in 1981 we will know how much the road will cost.
Cash Flow
One of-our big concerns in this project is of course cash flow.
This is a concern because the interest we receive on the money we have
invested is programmed into the cash available to complete the work
•
contemplated. In fact we have programmed $540,188 of interest to be used
for the construction and other costs contemplated.
The City sold bonds in the amount of $5,300,000. The use of these
funds was projected as follows:
Construction Costs $3,694,200.00
Interest 1,480,988.00
Issuance Costs 100,000.00
Reserve Funds 565,000.00
TOTAL $5,840,188.00
The difference between the $5,300,000 and the costs listed above
($540,188) is to come from interest earned on the money before it is
spent for construction purposes.
f
Memo to Mayor and City Council
Page -3-
In order to be sure that we received at least that much interest we
had to set a schedule for all of the improvements based on the pro-
jected cash flow. In April we indicated that because Kmart had
proceeded much faster than we or they had contemplated that we had
a cash flow problem for one month. After rescheduling everything
we overcame that problem
At this time we have again looked at the cash flow and find
that because some projects did not proceed as forcast that we now
have positive cash balances in every month, the lowest of which is
August of 1981 when the balance is projected at $130,770. The at -.
tached:sheets are the cash balance as projected in April of 1980 and
now. Both indicate that we have an unencumbered balance of over
$100,000 at the end of the period forcasted. After March of 1983
the tax increments begin coming in and no :cash from bond proceeds
are needed. This means that the balance of $115,000 is money that
could be used to cover the cost overruns in any off site projects
if that is necessary. Obviously, though, the earlier we would
spend that money if we needed it, the less there would be to spend
because it would not be earning interest.
•
Recommendations
1. It is recommended that the fence contract be approved for
Kmart and any other project for which they wish to spend
their part of the money if it is an eligible project and
approved by the City.
2. It is recommended that we assess the portion of the water -
main project which is assessable because this is an appro-
priate assessment and will allow the money saved in the
tax increment project to be used for debt retirement of the
total bond issue and shorten the life of the tax increment
project.
3. It is recommended that we should not at this time consider
spending the money now shown to be available in March of
1983 until after we have completed the project now contem- .
plated. Once there are bid and actual costs known (sometime
in fall of 1981> we should then consider the use of this
money for some other eligible public purpose in the tax
increment project or to use it to retire the debt and
again shorten the life of the tax increment project as
much as possible.
DSR /dac
.
L I 1 Li 1 1 1 1 LI II I 1 i:
I I — ___________4
I • . •
1 t.
-------- •
iiiI , Ii .
. .,
. . __ _ _ . .
. __. _.. _ ____
. . .. .
t,
I'lili IL 1 I 1 ,.
1 --,--, ; nZ L Tr i , i ___ _ _
E 4/ y.,,v1",/
1 1 1 1 1 I 1 Tr 1 •
_z i j " I
1. 1 - • -- - ••42 . ••,,, 7
a al /re i & 0 t, - - - • t.---...
0 7
1 1 . 1 - 1 ir-i-
! 1
' ' (. j t. • . 1 I7 .
j . 1 1 1 1 z 1 I 1 ( 1 7 ( 1 1 I I I I I 1 / i 01 t
1 1 1
--- 7 .--- - 1 - f - - -- - IT -1—. — — o' r 3- 1 .77 -7 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . I 1 -
I . I 1 I 1 1
' I / akfr- '11 li i I ' OISIS A V't
I I I 1 I . , ,
! 1
I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I
/, 0, 0 5, t / • • 1 '/- ••-i' - 6
• - -- i e i --------------- ci" - i
i I Q-5-.
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I
- 1 '
/7* bh el ' ( I si c., JO / • ;
I i 1
1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I ! I
. . .
I I I 1 I
• • - - - — — -- --- - .--
• . ''', 1- :'
.-- ..1.1 I I I ■ i I i - I -- r . I /0' (..,./ i
• • •
1 I 1 I 1 1
- --- :, • - . I . .
! I I I I I •
I I
b" ' A-z z (..,7 !c 't ; • 6;i:Z '): /11 1 ! . 0L. ilf. -
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1
i
- . CH - — - - -- ---------- ----- -
5i; / '-' — ; 1 ..", VC -
i — elalj, 4: fire • Cj Ei Z il 1 I I I I i 1 1 ' -
I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ; '
I 3 n, i 4 (17 ---2 TI: 1r) 1 .---/-7,,rr-----44,-,,,,,,..;
, ..._._ 11. I.1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 oyy Lg-r• ,..-7 o i
— ; „•- z c., - - • ()I si A ., I; I
I 1 1 j 1 I I 1
! I I I
I, "n ,3 n 1 1,E. 6, 'a -. ,' 1 . . . .. . _ .. ..... _._ .... .. .
------
II i I I i -.. 1
- -- dVd3 21C . 1 i - LI i .. t - -
1 1 1 1 1. 1
1 1
. I .
— V 2 / ' • $.. - -- 7.:!?!/..: 7. - ' ( . ■ .1 6 & ■ - ' / ' L ' - - --- - - --------7---
I 1 1 11 j 1 1 I I 1 c r 1 ____
---- ---- ;Ii --- • - 1 - - - -- --- --- ...' ' , '.•
1 ) I 1 I 1 I 7' I 1 I
. — , 711,1+
I ---- /P LAI . . • - , . 0117 c. 6
u 1 1 I I I S 16 a'" 4 / • - --- - O s z ------------- i
I
---- • 4;i ;)•il ---- --- I C. I — *- • (.1 d 0 la) 1
I I I 11 1 II I 11 I I
- ,.)• (., 1 1 - • • - o 1 e -s 1 i I • . `c - 1 7 I -- — - - - ei - 0 . i:: v r
I
1 1 11 I I I ,.,
• - - 7 7 1i: - - — -- - .S
1 L IT 1 e l -1 1 - 1 I I r 11' ' 1' 1 I 1 rl -] __]
..
27/Z 'T --- -VI — — — - - - - ' 1 - - -- --- — 7 C. T.' .- --
1:I 11 1 1 1 I I 11 C) ...1(
.. ;
-- A - •:'):31.Fi / - ola It • 4 01 Vi
1 I ' - 1 i 1 -
,,_ .
-
i r - ,. •'-.- - - 4, ,s- ', T .------- 7 d ;
t l
1 .
t •
. .. • • I
i 1 1 ;
- 1 -,-5; r7 -c I / c-1,0
I
., a .... Lco...,.1„.i :
- 211... 1 :P.10:t .. • - •- s •7 .4 i.firp • -- ---- —
rj ----- ---- ' 1
----- .--------------=------ 2.
----- •
,
--- 0 --- g. - 4 -,---- w ,---- 6 ,-- 0 -----„,,_,•.,, r .7 ! J i r.:0 , 1...y ..,.,41 V VI? 5
•
...-- -_.. .
Eti06 - Cree”
t 206 - W NI a - r '
_ .• ___ 7, 4 0
/
F-S - r - 0_,..,-/ 77.---) -
IL i --- 2 3 4 5 6
("It __:: t.) 1
i, ,- . 2 .. ci / __LI ._ .._ ,_0;,$,I) - 7 - , I J
...C___ . 0 f
—
II c$-Y
-,11-------... . .
•
._
_ _ _I (
-- 3, -.;—:- .7
. __. ._..... _ .. __. .. _ . _ _ ... __ _ .. _ . _.
'.1 11_ Q•ca,-) 2, r,,3,, __ , _ 59 / , ,07:_,. III
: i ill __.-- t
_ ,
. 11 qt4 LI f S _l__•_,QI.-1 —
i , ,
-11.-/ "; 'a 4 00 i O .7
•: I I ( ' t 1;i' 2 • :
3/::2.4; 2 _ _ 7
s (n...3 0 _ ___
.._ _ ` 6 II I
.7 !. z.: . ..
..1.1 .
..._ __ _ . N 1 /7
II
v 11,..4 • . f.,.- .._ _. ._ c LI ,?..,: gi..04r.9 _
-, di Cil ) 8.1
p2g.9 3 / dR.1.
—
. ,212,;, _ _12 Ze 2.-99(..o _ _ _ ____
-;;•I
I /4t • I" 2 0. . 111- 1 7.3P — -- -- - L4 . li - 1 7.f Z
I _ _ _ _ , _ _ ___ __ _ ) ..;86) 2,4.3 S1L 7 ......_ 1
..
' !•1 af•t..-s. I ,_ 1 47 (a3
z 3. , : p ,_, 0 5,_ c) ____ _ c y I [47 4 ___ ___
ri! C...... . . .1_ ......._. . l 0 I.
ii () 1 f1 T --.
2.. e 7 I" 1 . %7 ._.. ._ . . 9 1 8.
a to 3 2- I 2 • lq, _
i ■
s 2 / • 0 7, / c . ? .... 0 • te2.12- 11e1
- • ii u•-• 0 $., 2 0. e2. .. . . 2. Cs 1 . 2 1 7 2 :1 1 19 , _ 11
ii, _
7e 2
_ i ..- ?r 0
..___
!/.. 1 ' 1
/.1 :s.__
ill 1 1 _
..,..„
..„_
I
I ... __
I 1 1 111 11_
it
...:,..
li _ _
__ ..... ..._
—ii
„,„).1 • _
_.
- • II 11111
;,..
...,,.
. ,
li
...4„
i! __ . 11 I 111 li 1E191 IIIIIp
„...
.,...,.,,.. , ..•.
. ,... .
.„,,,..•..,,..:.. :77:. '''':•:.:%:: 111 I II III II I II ll I 111111111111 II!
43 11 . op il _II
---
.,4,.
h!,11
._.______ I -,
„.,,..„
..
.,...,,r,.„,______,......_,,,_ ,._,...,.,_____,_._________,___._____.
ti F - 1 - — -- I '. I -1 I'T 'I - -- .-- -- 11 — ---------1
r 11 11 111 n111 �11■■m0■I 11111 11 mill 1111111111111111 1 1 Fill 1 1 1 1 1 F 1
w • 1 11 11 IIII■■ma■1m1/MINNIml , I■I■111■■nn j °£
11 11111111111 1 11 ml 1111111111111■ i 1 11 11 IIII ■Inl■■1111 ■ ... 163
2 1111111111111111ffill1111111 1! illifiellillimilffillIMmaimu 1 1 1 1 11 1111 i 1 a11a 1■ 1 83
Z 1 al 1 1 1 1 ■I 1 1 ` 11 mll I■® 1110•111111111111111111 1 1 11 1 11 1 11 9Z
; n
Z 1, I 1 ® 11 11 1 11111 11111 11 all 1 11■I 111 11 11 1 1 1 nom 1 . � 1 nonsinl■musion1■■aln a ®1 a■m r3 k' S
Z 1 /■I■i■i' G1 uIllnamm II1U■mll®1111 11 m 111■■1111■1®111■®1111 11 . �, _,.c.-0.,:-. 6Z
Z I■ mflhJ jI111■IQ■■nln■1na Ii In11 11n ®1H1■I■1111�111UJ .1, ei w £z
Z' 1 1 111 i I 11 h I n ml mn 11 n n■■MN . z _t- s i zz
z■ 1 II ■ 1 1 11 NV�Iall i I ,, CY I
z. 11 I ,1 `I 1'1°1 11 11111111111111111MIIIIIIIIIEEki11111111111111111111111111E1111111111111111111111111111 ii i "
, 11 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 i i li II Emmilimiiiimm 11 l n1t11 1 1111 lI 1 11 i l I 1 11 1 1 ii 1 nil ,,v:,C 116'
ii 11 11 1 iHi mn 11 1111 11 Iii 111111111111111111 i fl 11!I it 1 11 I iill 11 11 1 II A vt.,,., i -
`11 1i 1111 11 1!!1i 111 11 1111 h.11 11 '1111 11 11 ;I 11 11 1 11 1i ,_ ;ic;
ii
,I .11; i NOINIONIMIT r i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 fl i 1' 1 1 1 ! 1 1; 1 '1 1 1 1 1 .7,,.; 1191
I 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 it 1 1 1 11 Ii i 1 1 1 1 'l 1 1 1 mil i ii j 1 i
� � � � • oc cGi; f
I�
I � 1
11 ii Ii �i 11 1 11 11 as ®_ l2 ws !i e i
it rl iI Inn II 11111 11 "1M11111111111111 ii 11 . iI -1 1 1'11 Hill 1 1 11 ..0-3 El
i I■ nU1 ° 1 ' 1 1 01111111.111MMUMNIIIHEMBI 1 ` I y ` 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 11111 .... r' zi
I I . 11 11 11 I 1 HENiiiiiiitill111111111MMUINEMBIE111111H11111161Eimill 1 1 18M-1zinim■I■■■■I■ : " � ' -'° 1 ii
i 11 I ar - 'T '''1. 1 11 11 a" O 1 7 ° 1 ' 1 / 1 1 °'
' I■ .1 11 '1 11 11 11 m�111n 11 1111 11 °k °ici °! II `.'�1° 11 `_1'i l'i . 1°°,c1 ( 11 1 . 1111 hf . • 6
11 111n■■In1■1m�
1■III1■I■ 1 1 i 111 111 11 6- 1 - ' - 1 1 ■ • .. ' . '' - 8
11 i 1 I I __. f _.1__j._:_I � � I` �n1■: In._ . 1 L-1. _.. _111 __ ° • . r-/ " 1
' • I 1 1 11 m 1 °! Ii1n 1il ° li 11 1 11 m - °'hl 1 11 i 1' - . _ . • ,' v i� 9 • 1111111111111111.111111111101111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 hil■I aii ■I■ L-' Cif • S
n■1■1■1■I■I■ m� ■ /111111111■1111■1■1m1■ 1nI■I■111n■ 111■I111 ■1■1 e
111■1■1■1r1■I■1111 11111■1■1111■I■1n11■1 1111■I■alll 11111111111111111111111 I■ r == ` . f
1111■I■i■1■11[■ 11111 ■I■11111■1■HHIJ■11111■I■1111■ 11111 111■m1111■1 1 111111111111111111111111 .' r... °33 e - Z
11a■1■I■i■I■I■11111�1■IIIII■ i 111 ii■I■IIIII■i■1111 ■11111 (mum
allIll■1■l■■ ■ i
I / n , no' I : ° 111111111111i11111111111 _ ' 1 1
zi 1i Oi 6 8 ( 9 S D £ Z . i
CAP 11
C.' NS) ,J 4 / ` -9---1 in P :„„, ,,„.„
' BID TABULATION: Kmart Fencing Project
DATE: July 29, 1980 at 10:30 AM
FIRM BID BOND. UNIT BID
Century Fence Company
Box 100
Lump Sum
Forest Lake, MN 55025
X $71,059.00
Security Fencing
300 7th Avenue Southeast Lump Sum
Osseo, MN 55428
Crowley Fence Co., Inc.
10600 Nassau Stret Northeast • X Lump Sum $64,835.00
Mpls., MN 55434
Able Fence
111 East Acker Street
St. Paul, MN 55117 Lump Sum
Ganz Fencing
5709 Wilshire Blvd. X Lump Sum $75,276.00
Crystal, MN 55
Fenc -Co., Inc.
711 Winnetka Avenue North Lump Sum
Mpls., MN 55427
' s
BID TABULATION: Kmart Fencing Project Page -2-
DATE: July 29, 1980 at 10:30 P1
FIRM BID BOND UNIT BID
Midwest Fence & Manufacturing Co.
525 Villaume Avenue X Lump Sum $78,867.00
South St. Paul, MN
Ideal Enterprises, Inc.
15111 Summerhill Drive Lump Sum
Eden Prairie, MN 553+4
Tennis West
3860 Northshore Drive }{ Lump Sum $105,060.00
r
Mound, MN
Cyclone Fence
X $86,990.00
Lump Sum
U.S. Steel Supply Division
2445 University Avenue
•_ u•
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
•
- , i
MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Resolution No. 1655
DATE: July 24, 1980
The attached resolution is in accordance with the council
policy to begin condemnation action on all public improvement
projects. This resolution authorizes condemnation of the easements
needed for the sanitary sewer laterals in the Hauer's Addition.
DSR/ J 'sc
•
•
•
•
m. .�.ar�«,....,..u�s�.,•.we••; .�r.�.�,..,�,,.w..,�.. r. .r..,- � �.. er�. e.« <- ..ae.:�»,�.....+n»..,...... _. . n1.... s,..,•.»..• a�, �11*~14.:. �1••,,..,1101a... n., •••e•
•
•
Resolution No. 1655
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS
FOR THE N1 /2 OF SECTION 8- 115 -22
LATERAL SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
(Hauer's Addition 80 -1)
WHEREAS, it is necessary to provide sanitary sewer in the area
adjacent to the lines described in Exhibit A and numbered 1 through 4,
hereto attached and it is also necessary for the construction of said
sanitary sewer to provide sanitary sewer services to the existing and
future expanding installations in said area; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee has determined
that is would be to the best interests of the general public as well
as the area involved to construct said sanitary sewer and for that
purpose to secure the necessary easements therefor; and
WHEREAS, the City has been unable through negotiations to acquire
the :s necessary permanent and temporary easements to construct the
the said sanitary sewer.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that:
1. The obtaining of the permanent and temporary easements as
aforesaid is for a public purpose and within the powers of the City
of Shakopee and that condemnation proceedings is both appropriate,
expedient and necessary.
2. That the proper City officials forthwith institute eminent
domain proceedings by the City of Shakopee for the purpose of acquiring
permanent and temporary easements as set forth in Exhibit "A':' and
numbered 1 through 4 over the land as set forth in Exhibit "A ",
which is hereto attached and made a part hereof.
3. The said condemnation proceedings are authorized by Minnesota
Statutes Annotated Chapter No. 117 and the said proceedings should be
instituted and concluded at the earliest possible time and the proper
City officials are hereby authorized, instructed and directed to do all
things necessary and proper to carry out the terms and intentions of
this resolution.
Resolution Nb. 1655 Page -2
Adopted in' session of the Shakopee City
Council of Shakopee, Minnesota held Chia day of
1980.
s
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved 9.s to form this
day of , 1980.
City Attorney
•
EXHIBIT "A"
EASEMENT NO. 1
5 -7 -80
PROPOSED EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
A PERPETUAL EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES, OF
VARIABLE WIDTH UNDER AND ACROSS PART OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND PART OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 115
RANGE SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA, LYING NORTHWEST OF LINE 1
DESCRIBED BELOW AND LYING SOUTHEAST OF LINE 2 DESCRIBED
BELOW. THE SOUTHWEST SIDELINE BEING DESCRIBED BELOW AND THE
NORTHEAST SIDELINE BEING LINE 4 DESCRIBED BELOW.
LINE 1: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE. EAST LINE OF
SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY
OF COUNTY ROAD NUMBER 16, SAID POINT BEING 601.5 FEET
NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST
QUARTER; THENCE N 61 °44,, W ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY
BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 128.4 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING OF SAID LINE 1; THENCE S 10 ° 11'W A DISTANCE
OF 203.15 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS
POINT A AND THERE TERMINATING.
LINE 2: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF
SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER WITH SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY
OF COUNTY ROAD NUMBER 16, SAID POINT BEING 1354.4
FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST
QUARTER; THENCE S 20 ° 03' 20 " TA W A DISS1ANCE OFFJF219.9 A
TO POINT HERE ° �
HEREINAFTER EFLRRIE1 AS P O OIN B O �JD r T}
TERMINATING.
LINE 3: BEGINNING AT SAID POINT A; THENCE N 62 ° 23'20" W A
DISTANCE OF 400.00 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER
REFERRED TO AS POINT C.; THENCE N 62 ° 23'20" W
A DISTANCE OF 400.00 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER
REFERRED TO AS POINT D; THENCE N 62 ° 23'20" W A
DISTANCE OF 400.00 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED
TO AS POINT E; THENCE N 62 ° 23'20" W TO A POINT ON
SAID WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER DISTANT
1585.25 FEET SOUTH OF SAID NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID
NORTHEAST QUARTER;THENCE SOUTHWEST TO SAID POINT B
AND THERE TERMINATING.
LINE 4: COMMENCING AT SAID POINT A; THENCE N 10 ° 11' W A
DISTANCE OF 21 .00 FEET TO THE POT;' 1 O ' . BEGINNING OF
SAID EINE 4; THENCE NORTHWEST TO A POINT 30.00 FEET
NORTHEAST OF SAID POINT C AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR
TO SA;.E) LINE 3; THENCE NORTHWEST TO A POINT 30.00
FEET NORTHEAST OF SAID POINT D AS MEASURED
PERPENDICULAR TO SAID LINE 3; THENCE NORTHWEST TO A
POINT 20.00 FEET NORTHEAST OF SAID POINT E AS
MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO SAID LI''E 3; THENCE NORTH-
WEST I'ARKLL.EL TO SAID LINE 3 TO 1 TS INTERSECTION
WITH S A I D LINE ;1 AND THERE TERMINATINC .
' 5/7/80
EASEMENT NO. 2
PROPOSED EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES, 20.00 FEET IN
WIDTH, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 115, RANGE 22,
SCOTT. COUNTY, MINNESOTA, .LYING NORTHWEST OF LINE 1 DESCRIBED
BELOW AND LYING SOUTHEAST OF LINE 2 DESCRIBED BELOW. THE SOUTH -
WEST SIDELINE BEING LINE 4' DESCRIBED BELOW AND THE NORTHEAST
SIDELINE BEING 20.00 FEET NORTHEAST OF, AS MEASURED PERPENDIC-
ULAR TO, AND PARALLEL WITH SAID LINE 4.
LINE 1: CO[11ENCING. AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF
SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHERLY .BOUNDARY
OF COUNTY ROAD NUMBER 16, SAID POINT BEING 601.5
FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SA1D SOUTHWEST
. QUARTER;, THENCE N 61° 44' W ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY
BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 128.4 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING OF SAID LINE 1; THENCE S 1(P ,11' W
A DISTANCE OF 2.03.15 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER
• REFERRED TO AS POINT A AND THERE TERMINATING.
LINE 2':• BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION'OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID
SOUTHWEST QUARTER WITH SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY
OF THE COUNTY ROAD NUMBER 16, SAID POINT BEING
1354.4 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE
S 20 03'2.0" W A DISTANCE OF 219.9 FEET; THENCE
S 39° 06' W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO At POINT
HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT B AND THERE TERMINAT-
ING.
LINE 3: BEGINNING AT SAID POINT A; THENCE N 62 0 23'20" W
• A DISTANCE OF 400.00 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER
REFERRED TO AS POINT C; THENCE N 62 ° 23' 20" W A
DISTANCE OF 400.00 FEET TO A POINT H: REINAFTER
REFERRED TO AS POINT D; THENCE N 62 ° 23'20" W A
DISTANCE OF 400.00 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER
REFERRED TO AS POINT E; THENCE N 62° 23'20" W TO
A POINT ON SAID WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER
DISTANT 1585.25 FEET SOUTH OF SAID NORTHWEST CORNER
OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTHWEST TO
SAID POTNT B AND THERE TERMINATING.
LINE 4: COMMENCING AT SAID POINT A; THENr,? N 10 ° 11' W A
DTSTANCE OF 21.00 FEET TO THE PO;! ;■T OF BEGINNING OF
SAID LINK, /1; THENCE NORTHWE:,'I' TO A POINT 30.00 FEET NORTH-
. EAST OF SAID POIN T C AS MEASURE:i PERPENDICULAR TO SAID
LINE 3; THENCE NORTHWEST TO A POINT 30.00 FEET NORTHEAST
OP SAID POINT D AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO SAID LINE 3; '
THENCE NORTHWEST TO A POINT 20.00 FEET NORTHEAST OF SAID
POINT E AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO SAID LINE 3; THENCE
NORTHWEST T'ARELLEL TO SAID LINE 3 TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH
SAID LINE 1 AND THERE TERMINATING.
SAID TEMPORARY EASEMENT SHALL EXPIRE ON AUGUST 31, 1981
MAY 6, 1980
EASEMENT NO. 3
PROPOSED EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
A PERPETUAL EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES, 20.00
FEET IN WIDTH OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS PART OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 115,
RANGE 22 , SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. THE CENTER LINE
OF SAID EASEMENT BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID
SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF COUNTY
ROAD NUMBER 16, SAID INTERSECTION BEING 601.5 FEET
NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER;
THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 475.5 FEET;
THENCE N 65 ° 22'W A DISTANCE OF 1327.50 FEET; THENCE S 15 ° 52'W
A DISTANCE OF 162.00 FEET; THENCE N 65 ° 22'W.. A DISTANCE
OF 16.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF 'BEGINNING OF THE CENTER LINE
TO BE DESCRIBED; THENCE S 65 ° 22'E A DISTANCE OF 99.88 FEET TO
ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF A ROAD 17 ,ASEMFNT DECRIBED
IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 125 373 AND''RECORDED TN THE OFFICE OF
REGISTER OF DEEDS, SCOTTJCOUNTY,,MINNESOTA, AND THERE .TERMINATING.
MAY 6,1980
EASEMENT NO. 4
PROPOSED EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES 20.00 FEET IN WIDTH, OVER,
UNDER AND ACROSS PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER
OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 115, RANGE 22 , SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. THE
SIDELINES OF SAID EASEMENT BEING 10.00 FEET SOUTHWESTOFANO30.00 FEET SOUTH-
WEST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST
QUARTER AND THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF COUNTY ROAD NUMBER 16, SAID
INTERSECTION BEING 601.5 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S ALONG
SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 475.5 FEU; THENCE N 65 W A
DISTANCE OF 1327.0 FEET; THENCE S 15 W A DISTANCE OF 162.00
FEET; THENCE N 65 W A DISTANCE OF 16.54 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING OF THE LINE TO BE DESCRIBED; THENCE S 65 ° 22' E A
DISTANCE OF 996.88 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE
OF A ROAD EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 125 373 AND RECORDED
IN THE OFFICE OF REGISTER OF DEEDS, SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA,
AND THERE TERMINATING.
SAID TEMPORARY EASEMENT SHALL EXPIRE ON' AUGUST 31, 1981.
' MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Resolution No. 1656
DATE: July 24, 1980
,The attached resolution sets the date for the
>•a. public hearing on the asessments for the East -View
First Addition improvements for August 19, 1980 at
8:45 PM.
DSR /dac
c
RESOLUTION NO. 1656
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE COST TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT 1980 -2
(Eastview 1st Addition)
•
WHEREAS, a contract has been let for the improvement of:
Eastview First Addition - all streets contained therein
by grading, aggregate base and bituminous surfacing, all
watermain, all sanitary sewer and all storm sewer
and the contracts for such improvements are $ 253,749.25 and
the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such
improvements amount to $ so that the total cost of the
improvements will be $ : and of this cost the City will
pay $ as its share of .the cost.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1. The cost of such improvement to be specially assessed is
hereby declared to be $
•
2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer
shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed
for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation,
as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assess-
ments in his office for public inspection.
3. That the City Clerk shall, upon the completion of such
proposed assessment, notify the City Council thereof.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
1. That a hearing shall be held on the 19th day of August, 1980,
in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 8:45 o'clock PM to pass upon
such proposed assessments and at such time and place all persons owning
property affected by such improvements and proposed assessments will
be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice
of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be publiched once in the
official newspaper. of the City of Shakopee at least two weeks prior
to the hearing and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the
improvements. He shall also cause mailed notice of such hearing to
be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll_
not less than two weeks prior to the hearing.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this clay of _ , 1980.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of , 1980.
City Attorney
•
•
- 5
•
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Resolution No. 1657
DATE: July 24, 1980
The attached resolution sets the date for the
public hearing on the assessments for the Holmes
Street trunk storm sewer for August 19, 1980 at
'8:15 '
DSR /dac
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 1657
A RESOLUTION DECLARING TIME COST TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT 80 -3
(Holmes Street Reconstruction)
•
WHEREAS, a contract has been let for the improvement of:
Holmes Street trunk sewer storm
and the contract price for such improvements is $477,656.00 and
the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such
improvements amount to $87,490.55 so that the total cost of the
improvements will be $565,146.55: and of this cost the City will
pay $282,573.27 as its share of the cost; and
WHEREAS, sanitary sewer services and curb and gutter will be
assessed after construction is complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1. The cost of such improvement to be specially assessed is
hereby declared to be $282,573.28.
2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer
shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed
for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation,
as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assess-
ment in his office for public inspection.
3. That the City Clerk shall, upon the completion of such
proposed assessment, notify the City Council thereof.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
1. That a hearing shall be held on the 19th day of August, 1980,
in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 8:15 o'clock PM to pass upon
such proposed assessments and at such time and place all persons owning
property - affected by such improvements and proposed assessments will
be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice
of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the
official newspaper;ofthe City of Shakopee at least two weeks prior
to the hearing -and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the
f ' 1
i mprovements. He shall also cause mailed notice of such hearing to
be given the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll
not less than two weeks prior to the hearing.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of , 1980.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1980.
City Attorney
4
MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Vacation of Minnesota Street
DATE: July 24, 1980
I recently received a letter from the City Attorney stating
that it is going to be necessary to vacate a portion of Minnesota
Street in order to straighten the street out which will be done
by the filing of the plat of Macey Second Addition.
Attached is the resolution setting the date for the public
hearing on the vacation.
DSR /jsc
cy� .,vr a �rl, \ i. � �4
� R C Jy
�! >: .I fi '!:ti D
JUL 19 1980
LJULIUS A. COLLET?, it
JULIUS A. COLLER ATTORNEY AT LAM' r- r 1 a
1859-1940 CITY OF ` I E
� 2 . 11 W EST FIRST AV EN U E
SnA K MINNESOTA
553Z0
July 17, 1980
Mr. Douglas S. Reeder
City Administrator
City Hall •
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear Doug:
It is going to be necessary to vacate a portion of Minnesota Street in
order to straighten the out which will be done by the filing of
the plat of Macey Second Addition. The vacation of course will have to
take place before filing of the plat and the filing of the plat will be
simultaneous with the filing of the decree of registration, so, therefore
it is necessary to set a time for hearing on the proposed vacation,pass
the Resolution and give a two weeks published notice in the Shakopee Valley
News and • by posting as provided in the Resolution.
All the Notice would have to say is across the top of the copy of the
Resolution is "Notice of proposed vacation of part of Minnesota Street ".
Since this was not petitioned for, it will be necessary that the Resolution
be adopted by 4 /5ths of all the members of the Council, so, if we can't do
it on the night of the proposed hearing it will have to be continued until
we can get a 4 /5ths vote.
After the Resolution vacating the street is passed then would you kindly complete
the original certificate enclosed, attach a copy of the resolution vacating the
street and send the same to the Auditor.
If you have any questions,.please call me.
Very truly yours,
r
uli s A. Coller, II
City Attorney
JAC /nh
Enc.
RESOLUTION NO. /665 •
•
.,.,A.,RE3OLUTION .,TO INITIATE VACATION OF THAT PART OF MINNESOTA STREET
" • • HEREIN DESCRIBED AND FIXING 'A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING'
ON; TAE PROPOSED VACATION
WI1EREAS, . It` has been Made to the City Coutikcil.' that' all` that .
part of Minnesota Street in the City of Shakopee hereinafter . described will serve
no public' use' or interest after the filing of the proposed plat of Macey Second
Addition, and i
WHEREAS, After the• filing of said 'plat: hereinafter described property would be
a liability rather 'than an asset to the City and to the general public and that it
would be to the best intereest 'of_ all parties that a public hearing be had before:,any
vacation::takes;. place,. s11 pursuant to 11SA 412.851.
• ..NOW THEREFORE, SE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, • ..
Hinneseta, That a will be held in the Council Chambers in the City Hall of
the City of Shakopee on the day of � 1980 at _ ____ ._ .
o'clock P.M. or as soon thereafter as can be heard on the proposal to vacate that part
of Minne8ota Street in, the Of . Shakopee, Scott County,, Minnesota lying, southerly •
,
of the. South :line of Fourth Avenue and northerly of the easterly extension of the
South line of Block 209, Lerienondie Addition , to the City of Shakopee.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That two weeks published notice be given by publication
•
in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS and two weeks posted notice be given by posting a copy
of such notice on the bulletin board on the rtin floor of the Scott County Courthouse,
on the bulletin board in Shakopee City Hall and on the bulletin board in the lobby
.of the First National P,ank 'of Shakopee. -
Ado tad in '
session of the Shakopee City Council held this -- day
of 1980.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: ..
City AdzuiriiEt:rat or ' ' ,
Approved E t' form this
day of ��, _ _ _� 1980.
I.
City ,At orney •
r
•
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Assessment Role for Park Ridge Drive
DATE: July 23, 1980
Attached is the assessment role for the Park
Ridge Drive This project is
complete and the hearing is scheduled for August
5th. We are presenting the assessment role at
this meeting so that the City Council will have
the opportunity before the hearing to review the
proposed assessments and request any additional
information needed for staff.
DSR /dac
•
•
•
•
,.
19 8 o ASSESS(11EfTS FOR SPECIAL. Ifr1PROVEMEf1T DISTRICT' 79-1
pii PARK RIDGE DRIVE Y` F
it
OWNER DESCRIPTION 1 AREA FRONT ASSESSMENT TOTAL
LOT FOOTAGE '
W =
Cecil Clay 27- 908 -5240- 007 -00 1 3.S. 2,384.58
• 2000 Eagle Creek Blvd. P/0 EZ NW4 beg. inters. W line Ei NW,' -, & W.M. 2,794.59
CL of #16, S 589.7, SE 233.6, N 706.2, ROAD 3,391.76
F4
F4 NW 155 to beg. 8,570.93
INT. 1,502.88
4
$10,073-.81 .,H
1
5 Rodney E Dragsten & Ann 27 -046- 0000 - 001 -00. 1 S.S. 2,384.58 i
gi 2001 Park Ridge Drive Lot 1, Block 1, Hauer's 1st Addn. W.M. 2,794.59
ROAD 3,391.76
4 .
8,570.93
INT. 1,502.88
$10,073.81
SF�
'.Gary E. Laird & Betty J. 27 -046- 0000 - 002 -00 1 S.S. 2,384.58 i
:;2009 Park Ridge Drive Lot 2, Block 1, Hauer's 1st Addn. W.M. 2,794.59 x?
ROAD 3,391.76 I
8,570.93 f:-. 1
^� INT. 1,502.88
ilt V. $10,073.81 ..
Richard Louis Dellwo & Bonnie Lou 27 -046- 0000 - 003 -00 1 S.S. 2,384.58
• 2017 Park Ridge Drive Lot 3, Block 1, Hauer's 1st Addn. W.M. 2,794.59
✓ - ROAD 3,391.76 I :-
8,570.93
4 INT. 1,502.88
$10,073.81• ':R
4 i1,4 ;
�._ . . _....,, ,Kam. ,...a .. : :. __,iF • .,,: •,a .y M
w�, _ _. �.Z� r _ > r e+.c .i��g`" .. . a. . a _. ,�. • ,...., � a� . :S. F«; - � �,. ... _ . - ,sa+ t - . - `r ^ -, , m.it = ` r ,�J _..r' ; i � .fr -*^ . 3,. .it a., i ' 9 s� �.:
i'. � C......l� `r` ,e.'�.�� 3 l ' �A.. ..` - �ic. :rw. ..a... ai� -.: �,.- •_...: �,.1'M�.e -.t� s .�..W., �:�C�x. � .._ t� '= ? '`3:•. �� ,�.rs's ,�. .:.fit `'�'!:3f'i.��t� - . �'.�t ':c� - "."t
`tia.. ew4. .. �( t.' t. r• i dsf. n r:.'.a31= 3 +- :��cT_Z'�f�.- -:A� , r��,., -i•}1 � X5'^0!.. r.:4 <.ce.i.• ; .•.�r�rs.2T`S.,.._ K._a.4•. .c..+4:: ^;x. -.. ff..:.•. , t:P.1iW .i i
t
PAGE 1 of 3 e
i,
19. ASSESSAlEf1TS FOR SPECIAL. IfY1PR ®VEMEf�T DISTRICT
p ' 80 79 -1 ...
PARK RIDGE DRIVE Y
i � A
r-..
a
q? OWNER DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT TOTAL
AREA FRONT
�r[�31ll.... FOOTAGE
[ Eugene F. Malz & Judy 27 -046- 0000 - 004 -00 1 S.S. 2,384.58 i.
0 2025 Park Ridge Drive Lot 4, Block 1, Hauer's 1st Addn. W.M. 2,794.59;
ROAD 3,391.76 v
:.
8,570.93
INT. 1,502.88
1,..,„ $10,073.81
t i . r
Henry M. Schrank & Diane 27 -908 - 5242 - 023 -00 1 S.S. 2,384.58
2033 Park Ridge Drive P/0 NW4 Com 1354.4 S of NE Cor SW 219.9', W.M. 2,794.59
SW 87.3, NW 271.16, SW 50, NW 200 to POB, ROAD 3,391.76 h
NW 130, SW 130, SE 130, NE 130 to beg. 8,570.93
V gil
INT. 1,502.88
:$10,073.81
azi
'a Stephen J. Heller & Vicki 27 -046- 0000 - 005 -00 1 S.S. _
2041 Park Ridge Drive Lot 5, Block 1, Hauer's 1st Addn. ROAD 3,391.7 q.
ri 5,776.34
INT. 1,012.86
$ 6,789.20
g = Gene Hauer & Virginia 27 -908- 5242 - 014 -00 1 S.S. 2,384.58
2088 Hauer Trail P/0 NW Com. 1354.4 S of NW Cor. SW 219.9, ROAD 3,391.7 -
SW 87.3 to POB SW 50.9, SW 291.1, NW 108.2, 5,776.34
NE. 300, SE 271.16 to beg EX E 50' EX .02A INT. 1,012.86 ft
Hauer 1st $ 6,789.2
car
i��t
? 3
Li
P I
f4, - f
.._�.�.�.7. -- ....^ 3A3 l ;- .." + i -x'. it =4, 1ZW.;.. a
iv1, ` ;y4 : '3� mfr +_v; .i.. ssY't ; �*et -e .��� , <.. ; '
$7 .rar � Nty rut &- :., s. �+ r"4
�. .-_ . <. _ xo,.c-- N.....w�fr J,-.. .....e. Y .. .... +:: rn. � �.. R:. lt+ i:: �r� 'ti::r�^...sn �r2�• _,1s: ��x '. .. -. +�. ��l�ry•:< 'tw'w�+3n'Lr?•���••^a.� � , .` ~...+. �q��.L:a..c!»£:�A�.� +ei •�E.ae<'..�� ���x2 . � r� "a'i�
,
PAGE 2 of 3
`. ;4 - 19 ASSESSIY1EfTS FOR SPECIAL._ 1�TIPROVEff1Ei1T DISTRICT 79-1 ' �
%..... ?° PARK RIDGE DRIVE •'
s ,
x
• H OWNER DESCRIPTION AREA FRONT
LOT FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT TOTAL
TA
Charles A. Olson & Wife 27 -046- 0000 - 006 -00 1 S.S. 2,384.58
2002 Park Ridge Drive Lot 1, Block 2, Hauer's 1st Addn. W.M. 2,794.59`
Iii; ROAD 3,391.76.
Te 8,570.93 , 570.93 1.
INT. 1,502.88
$10,073.81
John T. Noterman 27 -046- 0000 - 007 -00 1 S.S. 2,384.58
{ 2010 Park Ridge Drive Lot 2, Block 2, Hauer's 1st Addn W.M. 2,794.59 7 .
ROAD 3,391.76
ei
rt.; 8,570.93 ;
INT. 1,502.88 k
F $10.073.81 f
Y _
1
z 3'
bv City of Shakopee 27 -046- 0000 - 008 -00 475.25 ROAD 12,252.82
i . Park INT. 2,148.50 "
? $14,401.32 ..
t
3- NI
.
'
ctil 4;1 _ E1
f
eiz
J: , 1
il e. r t:
NR ; Y
i." 4, . 79
fA ins:
t`i ,.y 3.!._.;t- . N' t , .) ,;,..ra•r M .^.t l- :: + ' rL"+. `p' '`°" y,°. - 4: J •'1:.. Y: ��'A. .y ,.._ - '" ..t
i ., . _ . � t �:!.�'.��.. �'".. . .�. :�� ° '�.. r. a... -- �s: •eSSf'; �fx.. 1 •!} 1 ' : 'SSG, f ✓. i ": 3-�r,`.�.... 'L.. k:s �`i s c- M -. Q•o:i i !r�i5a.;. a�-rP' .: z'
a _. t- .....cwl :�.a..._ �- [.. . irSro a �.._ .• .._ _ ^ �4` ,Y'3.. ; ',,.. _r �i9lt 'la4 �hT '; } °. z�g� =:
...- .�,�..,:,mas'x...,Ct�3c r<_T<._.�. ,1? _ ��- E'• ti. �:, ss. .r...a..a..�s�.�.:•.r}r`. -err .< `k`.: ,.�`�Lx r.c �• �� ... t ��y�
.c.. m �" .,. _.. , ....:>i43. #� rlj cQ ': _c .. v., ,.__.. 5�. "" .r. �, yin m..a�
�" `S�� ,.._. - :,d:�� .,. �e.. .:.... �v'� ..'�"s','�i*.4ir's�i;r..t..�s; �a a'�E: •�� w. � 4�:i -r,..r .:ec�":t:.4 1 .5'�e"'.Si:*`. ...
I
I
PAGE 3 of 3
i(l)
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Assessment Role for County Road 83 Watermain
DATE: July 23, 1980
Attached is the assessment role for the County
Road 83 Watermain extension. This project is complete
and the hearing is- scheduled for August 5th. We are
presenting the assessment role at this meeting so
that the City Council will have the opportunity before
the hearing to review the proposed assessments and
. request any additional information needed for staff.
•
DSR /dac
•
•
.1
19 ASSESSfT1EfTS FOR SPECIAL. Ifr1PROVEff1Ef1T DISTRICT 79 - 7
v M COUNTY ROAD ' 83 f >'S
OWNER DESCRIPTION AREA FRONT ASSESSMENT TOTAL
, ACHES FOOTAGE
•
One Sheldon Associates 27- 076- 0000 - 001 -00 96.24 W.M. 1375' W.M. 28,775.52
c/o Kmart Corporation Lot 1, Block 1, Palley Park 3rd Addn. S.S.1437.24'S.S. 13,929.28
3100 W. Big Beaver Road 42 04.80 e
T Michigan 48084 ,7
INT. 7,488.13 $50.192.93
Attn: Helen Lefler
k �-
V i
Z. �
Valley Industrial Park Lt. 27- 909 - 5240 - 013 -00 W.M. 1375' W.M. 28,775.52
as c/o Scottland,Inc. Part of SE of NW4 of Sec. 9, and all of S.S. 1016' S.S. 9,846.75 k
P.O. Box 272 NE4 NW4 of Sec 9 of Township 115 North 38,622.27 '
Shakopee, MN
P 55379 and Range 22 West within City of Shakopee, INT. 6,772.27
County of Scott, State of Minnesota -
+3 $45 394 S4
S.R. Navickas 27- 904 - 5230 - 010 -02 10 S.S. 584' S.S. 5,659.95
rii
r.
2238 Edgewood Avenue So. P/0 S' of SE4 of SW4 & NW4 of SE4 of INT. 992.45 A
. Minneapolis, MN 55426 SW4, Sec. 4, T 115, R 22 ,
S
$ 6 652.40
iC ity of Shakopee 27- 081- 0000 - 013 -00 S .S. 162.76 S.S. 1,577.41
Lot 13, Block 1 Valley Park 5th Addn. INT. 276.59
:� $ 1,854.00
z. PI
1
s i...
hi l
b
t
1. 5y
�ky N 'tip '!^ -7- n SF .: viz'^` ' o� S '..`.. _ - : i :' ✓ :% ".¢, :: Z-' ;. - s.. fi _ . � .b', -Z z- r:*?7 w„l VIP-EA
h....,_ �'+oc��:� c �. - r..c�. .c :;�_ .<} ' . y.��r �_- �' � �.!- yp #'•fv`< -. a$;r.., .�:��`i� _ `Wi `3k'. Vii'. ' , �. .. * _.r-
i.o- � S:n`3� >>, C'Y'"� � ��.�`�.n2�= ?.�rYdt�.a7ii�_s -.. Y u:.:.... Yt` . F': > u' "��. �l}�Sw..i�!. 'etF....��- .4�'. .��?' ^� ....t -. ice ...e -. >_�: � 3 4 � s,�n - n�rJty < �;a�vcf`Q`. � '' .a..�..Le
■
PAGE 1 of 1
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator
RE: Capital Item List
City Goals for 1981
' DATE: July 23, 1980
•
We have previously (last meeting) sent out the
capital items list and the city goals packets. If
you do not still have your copy, please call and
we will deliver them.
DSR /dac
•
•
CITY OF SHAKOPEE ✓ �
.y` Sri ' .TM *.
'3.4 ��' 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
MEMO
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Douglas S. Reeder (jc)
SUBJECT: Beer License
DATE: 7-24 -80
We have received a completed application from the Brooks
Superette, Inc., 615 Gorman. The application is in order and the
Council may consider the application for an Off Sale 3.2 Beer License.
Action:
Move to.-approve the °application and 'grant an Off Sale 3.2 Beer
License to BtookS Superette, Inc:, 615 Gorman.
DSR /jsc