Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
July 15, 1980
TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ.REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JULY 15, 1980 Mayor Harbeck presiding. 1. Roll Call 'at 7:30 P.M. 2. Recess for H.R.A. Meeting 3. Reconvene 4. ,Communications: A] Ann Tuttle b] 5. Liaison Reports from Councilmembers: al Cncl.Colligan from the Fire Department, Joint Seven Man Committee and the Planning Commission • b] Cncl.Hullander from Scott County Criminal Justice Advisory Comm. c] .Cncl.Lebens from the Community Services Board d] Cncl.Leroux from the Shakopee School Board el Cncl.Reinke from the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission . f] Mayor Harbeck from Scott County Board of Commissioners 6. Recognition by the City Council of anyone present in the audience who desires to speak on any item not on the agenda . 7. Old Business: a] On Sale Beer License for Velodrome I, tbld. 6/24 b] Off Sale Beer License for BrooksSuperettes Inc., tbld. 6/24 c] Res. Noes. 1653, Apply ing for HUD 701 Planning Grant 8. Planning Commission Recommendations: a] Preliminary and Final Plat of Halo 2nd Addition, lying North of Hwy 101 and East of Marschall Road Developer: Wallace D. Bakken, Route 3, Box 258 Action: Resolution No. 1644 Planning Comm. Recommendation: City Planner will report b] Request to rezone a 0.71 acre parcel lying S of Eagle Creek Blvd., E of Marschall Rd. and N of the RR tracks, from R -4 High Density to B -1, Highway Business Applicant: Brooks Superettes Action:- (Applicant has withdrawn application) Planning Comm. Recommendation: Denial 9. Routine Resolutions and Ordinances: a] Res. No. 1648, Declaring the Cost To Be Assessed And Ordering the Preparation of Proposed Assessments 79 -1 (Park Ridge Drive) b] Res. No. 1649, Declaring the Cost To Be Assessed And Ordering the Preparation of Proposed Assessments 79 -7. (CR -83 Utilities) c] Res. No. 1650, A Resolution Approving The Final Plat of Macey Second Addition d] Res. No. 1652, A Resolution Denying A Rezoning Request from SPUC 10. New Business: a] Approves Application for Maxi Audit Grant b1 Appointment to CR18 Bridge Citizen Advisory Committee • c] 8:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING— PC 80 -24V Request for a five foot variance from the side yard setback requirements in order to construct a 22' X 30' attached garage, in a R2 zone Applicant: 'Steve Hentges, 3055 Hauer Trail Action: Direct preparation of appropriate resolution Planning Comm. Action: Approval of two foot variance r TENTATIVE AGENDA July 15, 1980 Page -2- d] 9:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Proposed use of revenue sharing e] Award bids for 1980 Seal Coat Program f] Minnesota Watershed Act g] Res. No. 1651, Ordering Preparation of A Report on Improvement of Prairie Street from 3rd to 4th h] City Engineer status report on public improvement projects i] .Report on East Bluff Avenue j] Authorize payment of the bills k] Surplus Property 1] Sewer Service Billing m] 1981 Goals n] Council receives Capital Items List 11. Consent Business: 12. Other Business: a] Authorize purchase of heavy duty engine stand • b] Set bid letting date for fencing of Kmart c] 13. Adjourn to Tuesday, July 29, 1980. - 1 Douglas S. Reeder City Administrator • +:'. a: x�na.. �. rie s7}avet +K :s �. •:.:f ;: �. s.....:. ts..kti .•. ...,v :. .. - *"*"'..""'" 1 ";;; 4' ';• 41. «., +w.. ..•..... • - H+51:4it � s +etYc? , ?x'.37 uof,...t��stw�?.xwv.e:. , � - �_.... _. _. ... .,.... -. � .. -._ TENTATIVE AGENDA ALQ SHAKOPEE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPECIAL SESSION JULY 15, 1980 Chrm. Hullander presiding 1] Roll Call at 7:35 P.M. • 2] Approval of Minutes of June 3rd, 1980 and June 17th, 1980 3] Resolution No. 80 -5 - A Resolution Authorizing Execution of Amendment to Redevelopment Contract. 4] Progress Report on Elderly High -Rise. 5] Application for Notary Commission 6] Review of National Housing and Redevelopment Officials Commissioner's Workshop 7] Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project a. Request for cost increase due to finance costs by Joe Miller Construction. b. Contract clauses requested by Goodwin Builders. 8] Approval of Bills! a. Miller /Davis Company, $16.50, for legal forms. b. Capesius Insurance, $20,000, for notarial bond. c. Treasurer, State of Minnesota, $10.00, fee for notary Commission Application. d. Pittsburgh - Des Moines Steel Company, $47,065.00, for partial estimate voucher number 6, contract 79 -9, for Kmart water tower. e. Von Klug and Associates, $346.43 for May professional services, relocation for Fourth and Minnesota Neigh- borhood Revitalization Project. f. National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials, $155,00, Registration for Richard Hullander to attend commissioner's workshop. 9] Other Business 10] Adjourn. Jeanne Andre H.R.A. Director 0 w.:+ Hv.:.[ at�iv: w.- s �i: ia �... s` �t:: csTdr i''-a 'l�':i nc_ r ..c.,,s � .t3 • .,:,� ' HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Regular Session Shakopee, Minnesota June 3, 1980 Chrmn. Hullander called the meeting to order at 7 :47 PM with Comm. Reinke, Lebens and Colligan present. Absent: Cncl. Leroux. Also present: City Administrator, Douglas S. Reeder; City Engineer, H. R. Spurrier; HRA Director, Jeanne Andre and City Attorney, Julius A. Coller, II. Colligan /Lebens moved to approve the minutes of May 6th and May 13th, 1980, as kept. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion was held on the Fourth & Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project and the selection of Contractors. Reinke /Lebens moved that the proposal from the Joe Miller Construction Company be accepted,:'as recommended by the HRA Director, for the building of a single family home on Lot 1, Block 1 of Macey's 2nd Addition. Motion carried unanimously. Reinke /Colligan moved to accept the recommendation of the HRA Director that Simon Haefner be allowed to build a treated wood foundation instead of the concrete block foundation as presented in his original proposal for one of the homes in the 4th and Minnesota Project. Motion carried unanimously. City Atty. reported on the process of torrencing the land for Macey's 2nd Addition. He stated that is would be about August before the torrencing process would be complete. Discussion held. Colligan /Reinke moved to accept the recommendation of the HRA Director as stated in her memo of May 20, 1980 to designate the following builders to coincide with the drawn site plan which had been prepared: Clete Link - Block 2, Lots 3 and 4; Larry Link (Link Cabinets) - Block 2, Lots 7 and 8; Goodwin Builders - Block 2, Lots 5 and 6, 9 and 10, and Block 3, Lots 1 and 2, Macey's 2nd. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion was held on the proposed Development Agreement with Contractors for the 4th and Minnesota Project. City Atty. recommended the checking into'the acceptability or a Contract.for Deed FHA. Specific discussion took place on the recommended-Contractor Letter of Credit Dave Goodwin of Goodwin Builders was present to voice his concern about the Letter of Credit. He stated that this had not been indicated in the original specifications and this needed Letter of Credit would increase the bid proposals. The HRA suggested that the Builders be allowed to add on an additional cost to their bid proposals for the Letter of Credit. It was suggested further that all selected builders be contacted to see what the additional cost would be to include the Letter of Credit. • 0 Ppoceedings of the Shakopee June 3,. 1980 Housing and Redevelopment Authority Page -2- Reinke /Colligan moved to the HRA Chairman to the Commissioners Workshop - National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials in Las Vegas at an approximate cost of $919.00 ($185.00, Registration Fee; $384.00, Roundtrip Airfare - Mpls /Las Vegas /Mpls.; $350.00, Other Expenses). Discussion was held as to whether the HRA should pay the total cost of airfare. It was agreed that airfare would be a reasonable expense to.be paid by the HRA. Roll Call: Ayes - unanimous Noes - none Motion carried Colligan /Lebens moved to adjourn.. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8:30 PM. Jeanne Andre HRA Director • 4 • HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 4 Special Session Shakopee, Minnesota June 17, 1980 Chrmn. Hullander called the meeting to order at 7:35 PM with Comm. Leroux, Lebens and Colligan present. Absent: Comm. Reinke. Also present: Mayo Harbeck; City Admin., Douglas S. Reeder; City Eng., H.R. Spurrier; Finance Director, Jeanne Andre and Assistant City Attorney, Phil Kanning. Lebens /Colligan moved to accept the special meeting call. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan /Lebens moved to accept the Annual Financial Report. Motion carried unanumously. Discussion was held on the final review of Development Contract for the Fourth and Minnesota Project. Specific discussion entailed the additional costs to include the Letter of Credit. HRA Director passed out a memo to the Commissioners regarding revised price figures for the 4th and Minnesota Neighborhood Reviatalization Project. It was recommended by the Comm. to review each contractor's financing costs individually, and to allow a $300 cost for Goodwin Building. The HRA also gave their agreement to the HRA Director that if contractors could not meet the required established prices for the building of the homes in the Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project, she would then be allowed to move to another selection of contractor for the proposed sites. Leroux /Colligan moved that the Contract for Developers, as presented, become the standard form contract for the 4th and Minnesota Project. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux /Colligan moved that the proper officials enter into a Standard Underground Distribution Agreement with Shakopee Public Utilities Commission at an estimated cost of $3,098.00 Roll Call: Ayes - unanimous Noes - none Motion Carried Leroux /Lebens moved to approve the following bills; as presented: 1) Von Klug and associates, $789.69 for April services; 2) Wermerskirchen. Abstract Co„ $243.00 for continuation of seven abstracts; 3) Chapin Publishing Co., $24.44 for publication of bid invitation; 4) Shakopee Valley News, $37.63 for publication of bids, resolutions and notice of public hearing; 5) Suburban Engineering, $1,259.00 for preparation of final plat and staking of plat corners; 6) Shakopee Public Utilities Commission, $1,524.00 for deposit for underground utility service. Lebens /Leroux moved to amend the bills to include the approval of payment to Travel Disigns, $230.00 for airfare for Chrmn. Hullander to attend NAHRO Commissioners workshop. Roll Call: Ayes - unanimous Noes - none Motion Carried Roll Call on main motion as amended: Ayes - unanimous Noes - none Motion Carried Proceedings of the Housing and June 17, 1980 Redevelopment Authority - Shakopee Page -2- • • 'Chrmn. Hullander reported that he has had no success with any organization financing the move of the smokehouse from the 4th and Minnesota Project to the Minnesota Valley Restoration Site. Discussion was held on the possibility of the HRA financing the move either through the money from the 4th and Minnesota grant or from the HRA's General Fund budget. Leroux moved that the HRA move the smokehouse and pay the cost not to exceed $2,000 from its present location to the Minnesota Valley Historical Site. Motion died for lack of a second. Hullander /Leroux moved that the HRA pay for the cost of the move of the smokehouse, not to exceed $2,000, if the cost can be included through the 4th and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project. Discussion continued. Cncl. Colligan moved the question. Roll Call,:' Ayes - Hullander, Leroux Noes - Lebens, Colligan Motion failed Leroux /Colligan moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8 :12 PM. Jeanne Andre HRA Director • • 3 MEMO "TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director RE: Adoption of Resolution No. 80 -5 DATE: July 11, 1980 The Assistant City Attorney has prepared Resolution No. 80 -5 for the HRA in order to include a fence as one of the improvements to be provided under the Redevelop- ment Contract with Kmart. I recommend that the resolu- tion be adopted and that the HRA request the City to advertise and administer the construction of this improve- ment in line with the agreement previously executed between the City and the HRA. • • RESOLUTION NO. 80 -5 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT CONTRACT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority has by Resolution No. 79 -18 adopted August 14, 1979, approved that certain Redevelopment Agreement by and between The Shakopee Housing and Redevelop- ment Authority and K Mart Corporation, which Redevelopment Agreement does, inter alia, set forth in Exhibit "A" thereto certain authorized On -Site Improvements with respect to said redevelopment project; and WHEREAS, it has become necessary and convenient to expand the approved On -Site Improvements authorized by said Redevelopment Contract; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SHAKOPEE HOUSING AND RE- DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS: 1. The attached amendment to contract for sale of land for private redevelopment in Valley Industrial Park Redevelopment Project No. 1 by and between The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Shakopee and K Mart Corporation is hereby in all respects approved; and 2. The Chairman and Executive Director are hereby authorized and directed to enter into said Agreement. Adopted this day of July, 1980, in the regular session of The Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Richard Hullander, Chairman ATTEST: Jeanne .Andre Executive Director Prepared and Approved by: KRASS, MEYER & KANNING CHARTERED 1221 Fourth Avenue East Shakopee, MN 55379 • a+ SA2- t' �£+ �Lw' f.. 34bvdlb. 1. lcQ.t C�{ �.' hu' �L1�}f'.i:xuas°Y'A ^4�-"�;T ?.:cg..,ti..Y.e:. � ':4L"7"s..fp.V4ta n'f74:l yt ?..bi:aaA...; .. .,. - fr4:cif FX 4 .... .. ,... , . THIS AMENDMENT, made and entered into this day of July, 1980, by and between THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, a public corporation of the State of Minnesota • (hereinafter called the Authority), and K Mart Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Michigan (hereinafter called the Developer); WITNESSETH THAT, in the joint and mutual exercise of their powers, and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto recite and agree as follows: Section 1. Recitals. The Authority and the Developer have entered into a contract for sale of land for private redevelopment in Valley Industrial Park Redevelopment Project 1 dated the first day of October, 1979. Exhibit "A" thereto does set forth in Section II. certain "On -Site Improvements." Section 2. B of said Section II of Exhibit "A" is hereby amended to read as, follows; "B. Construction of concrete and asphalt parking area, exca- vation of unstable soil, replacement and compaction of granular fill to accommodate development construction, grading, the in- stallation of railroad spur track, landscaping and fencing, all as shown on the approved plan submitted to the City of Shakopee for building permit application dated July 6, 1979. Estimated cost $320,000.00." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Authority has caused this Agreement to be executed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers; and the Developer has caused this Agreement to be executed in its name by its duly -1- • MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housings and Redevelopement Authority FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director. RE: Progress Report on Elderly High -Rise DATE: July 8, 1980 Work on the Elderly High -Rise is still ahead of schedule, with occupancy expected in October, 1980, two months earlier than originally anticipated. Sovell Management will be in charge of rental of the units, and has scheduled an information session on Tuesday, July 29, 1980 . at 3:00 P.M. at St. Mary's School. Information on this meeting will be sent to the approximately 200 persons on the interest list for apartments in the high - rise. At the meeting, information on the application criteria and proced- .ures-will.be provided to interested persons. Most of the .H persons•who'have indicated an interest in the apartments so far are from Shakopee. The money placed in escrow with the State Housing Finance Agency will be refunded to the City when it can provide exe- cuted contracts for the construction of the water main to serve • the high - rise. The City has been awarded $11,282.00 under the Title III -B Older- Amercians Act Grant to purchase equipment for the multi- purpose center to be located in the community room of the high - rise. The Jaycee Women have already contributed $1,000.00 for window covering or other furnishings for the center, and we may solicit funds from other organizations as necessary Co complete the facility for use by the seniors. JA /dc MEMO TO: Members of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, HRA FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director RE: Application for Notary Commission DATE: July 8, 1980 Due to the number of legal activities that will be undertaken with the sale of homes in the Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project, it would be useful if the director of the HRA could be commissioned as a notary. The cost of this commission would be approximately $50.00, including a bond, commission fee, stamp and seal. I. recommend that the HRA authorize the HRA Director to undertake the necessary steps to be commissioned as a notary. • • 7q MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority (k1RA) FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director RE: Letter of Credit Costs, Joe Miller Construction Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project DATE: July 11, 1980 Joe Miller Construction has submitted a request to increase their contract proposal price by $570.00, the cost they will be charged for a letter of credit. I recommend that we allow an increase of $285.00, which is one -half of this amount. • • - 7 b MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director RE: Contract Clauses Requested by Goodwin Builders Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project DATE: July 10, 1980 Goodwin Builders, Inc. is concerned that the delay in starting the houses is escalating their :costs, particularly as it pushes into the winter construction period. Their proposal was based on a July 1st starting date and the best guess now for start of construction is August 15th. This date could be pushed back further. In addition they will incur the costs for the appraisal now, and want to insure this money will not be lost if there are problems with the project. Goodwin submitted the attached terms as an addendum to their original proposal. My informal poll of the HRA membership suggested that although you may be sympathetic to this request, you would like to see dollar amounts in- volved.eased on this concensus, I reviewed the Goodwin terms with Sharon Goodwin and have revised them as follows: 1) The Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority will reimburse Goodwin Builders for the cost of ,FHA appraisals on the buildings to be constructed if the contract is nullified. 2) If the HRA directive to start work is given after August 20, 1980, costs for each building will be increased by 2 %. (This amounts to $1,520, or $760 per unit, and would increase the price to be paid by each buyer) If the directive to start work comes after October 20, 1980, the contract will be nullified. 3) No matter when the start work directive is given, a cost increase will be allowed for each building which has not been completed and closed prior to December 1, 1980, according to the following schedule: December, 1980 - $225.00 January, 1980 - $225.00 February, 1980 - $225.00 This clause could potentially increase the cost of each unit up to a maximum cost of $337.50 if not closed until after February, 1980. JA /dc ` 7 L:::1 � • i to IN [.' ILDERS, INC. 1975 MABEL COURT - CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 - (612) 448-5522 July 8, 1980 ATTENTION: HRA Shakopee Director of HRA, Jeanne Andre City of Shakopee City Attorney, Mr. Coller SUBJECT: Proposal of Goodwin Builders, in to Construct 4 Duplexes In the Macey's Addition to ON • r� The following will become part of our proposal: In our proposal already we addreseed the possibility of an escalation clause — but the HRA and the City of Shakopee o want it more specific. Thus after conversations with Mr. Coller, City Attorney; Jeanne Andre, HRA Director, and our attorney, O William O'Dell, it was agree that if construction is not started by August 15, because of the delay of torrencing procedures or what have you — we should have an escalation clause in our proposal: All other terms of our proposal remain the same. ,0 1. Buildings that are started before August 15, 1980 and an contract contract signed before, July 11; and the buildings closed on p9 before, December 1, 1980 — no escalation clause. If the buildings started in this time period are not closed on by December 1, 1980,' a 2% escalation clause will have to be added on for each month O the building is held. If as many buyers come forward as suggested `fiyJeanne- Andre, this should be no problem for either the city or o ''" builder. 0 2. Any building started between August 15 to September 15 — 2A added to our proposed price before construction begins. (Note: these units will have winter construction involved.' N 3. Any building started after September 15, and each 30 days after a 2A escalation clause per month per building per delay. General notes: abolar the above items added to our proposal. 1. Very difficult to pinpoint these extra costs — especially when construction was to have begun on July 1, per our original proposal. 2. We can start construction before torrencing is completed — if the HRA and the City of Shakopee allows — and if this were done — it would be a saving to the proposed home buyer — remember your project is to give the proposed home buyer the most house for the least amount _ a.. 7 • G •®VAIN - %UILDERS, INC. 1975 MABEL COURT • CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 • (612) 448.5522 Page 2. of "legal" type fees. 2. We will make appliation for FHA as sonn as we sign a contract - note that we were given to days to have an revised proposal to you by June 16 - so that we could get the contract signed - and here it is July 8, and still no contract signed - delays again. Another question? We are questioning the reason's of why we are paying for the appraisal and in- spection fees for FHA. Because the City and HRA remain the fee holder of the property, we are the builder and the contract holder in name only - we have no legal rights to the property - and the fee holder normally pays for the appraisal and the inspection fees! This was something else that was not mettioned in the "quotation" sheets that we bid from provided to us by the HRA and the City of Shakopee. The cost are $90 per unit for three inspections - $720.00 plus mileage and $75 per unit for the appraisal - $600.00 = $1320 plus mileage for another un- expected in this project for the builder - not really fair is it!!! In our'original conversations with Jeanne Andre, we were told the lots would be deeded to us during construction - we thought we would be deeded the lots to us on a warrenty deed and the appraisal and inspection fees would be our cost - but now it is not being done this w e ay ax other change in plans as this project has progressed! we have nc� egal right to th ots. hese are sale expenses and not construction expenses. 4. We have also had to use an attorney - to obtain help in getting to the point of getting a contract together - more $$$ involved out of the builders pocket. 5. Seems like there have bean so many unexpected expenses in this project before construction begins - which should of been spelled out in the "quotation" sheets given to us to place our bids from. Because of this we feel as if the builder should not have to be responsible for all of the additional expenses that keep arising. Hopefully when these last few items are presented to you and to the HRA Board we will have overcome the last of the obstacles, and this project will then proceed on a business like atmosphere and everything will run on schedule. We are ready to submit our application to FHA and will sign the contract as soon as you have it prepared and at that time hope • that the project runs along smoothly. Submitted by: Goodwin Builders, Inc. ., Gary T. Goodwin 71 Gl•AVIN 1WILDERS, INC. 1975 MABEL COURT • CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 (612) 448-5522 June 16, 1980 SUPPLEMENT TO PROPOSAL OF April 7, 1980, to HRA and City of Shakopee Submitted by: Goodwin Builders, Inc. THREE DUPLEXES To be constructed on Block 2, Lots 5,6 and Lots 9,10 and Block 3, Lots 1,2, Mace's Second Addition, Shakopee, Minnesota REVISED COST OF EACH DUPLEX - $70,600.00 *See NOTE: on page 3 Per HRA's'request the following was excluded from the proposal: Building Permit FHA points Appliances, except hood Per HRA's request the following was added into the proposal: Storm doors for each building Seeding for the rear yards OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE BUYER: Stove - $245.00 Refrigerator - $300.00 Disposal - $80.00 Dishwasher - $260.00 Alpine Combination Window units - $740.00 each building also, $12.00 per window for additional painting 7- GSOWIN E UILDERS, INC. 1975 MABEL COURT • CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 - (612) 448-5522 Page 2 Per our plan an additional bedroom is possible. Specificationsflor third bedroom - would include the necessary sheetrock, electrical, heating, millwork, labor and $160.00 flooring allowance, and the room would be ready for painting and varnishing $950.00 If room is to be painted and varnished by contractor add an additional $300.00 If the grading is followed as shown on the gradng plan furnished to the contractor by the City of Shakopee on Lots 5,6 Block 2 and Lots 9,10 Block 2, Macey's Second Addition, no demolition will be necessary, but if grading plan is not followed - builder will not be responsible for any additional costs. STARTING DATE; As indicated by City Attorney, Mr. Colier and HRA Director, Jeanne Andre, the 1st building would be started August 1, 1980 (or as soon as torrencing is completed) 2nd building 4 -6 weeks later - however the 2nd building would be started sooner if and when HRA and the City of Shakopee have the units in the lst building sold. Third building would be started when the lst building is completely sold and closed on. Buildings will.be completed in approximately 90 days and builder (following language taken from Builder's standard building contract) shall not be liable for delays caused by acts of arbitration, fires, strikes, legal acts of public authorities, war, inclement weather, allocation of materials or material priorities, delays or defaults by public or private carriers, acts of Owner -Buyer or of persons employed or hired by (Owner- Buyer) Acts of God, or other causes beyond the control of the builder. Having been delayed by the HRA on the starting dates already from July 1 to July 15 to August 1, 1980, and if not started by August 15, and remember that the original proposal was dated April 7, 1980 - for a July 1 starting date - there may be a possible price increase of materials if delayed after August 1. The contractor whall do his best to hold the prices of materials, but price adjustments may have to be made. The contractor'will make HRA aware of any price increases per building before construction actually begins if delayed after August 1, 1980. GOODWIN tUILDERS, INC. 1975 MABEL COURT - CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 - (612) 448-5522 Page 3 ' Attached please find full plans and specifications to submit for FHA appraisal. As we did not receive your letter until, Friday, June 13, we requested our Insurance Company to send you Certificates of Insurance, as per the coverage you requested. Attached is a letter from the bank indicating a letter of credit will be given to the HRA in our behalf, before the start of construction. If the units are pre -sold - before construction begins - this line of credit possibly could be increased. * NOTE: That to obtain ADDIONAL FINANCIAL GUARANTEE TO THE HRA and the CITY OF SHAKOPEE - an additional $900 to $1700 will have to be added to each building we are to consruct. Submitted by: /I • ... % c�lti v� Gooc Wb.n Builders, Inc. Gary T. Goodwin 7 u DVVIN BUILDERS, INC. 1975 MABEL COURT • CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 • (612) 448.5522 June 23, 1980 ATTENTION: City of Shakopee and Shakopee HRA Jeanne Andrea Subject — 2 additional duplexes Goodwin Builders, Inc. would be willing to construct the two additional duplexes for the City of Shakopee and the HRA. The builder will in the next day or so, check the two additional lots, to see if they require the same amount of concrete blocks, etc. If the two lots require the same amount of blocks, etc, the only additional cost per building would be: Per Duplex Building — $750.00 Basically, this cost is because of the possibility of winter construction — for heat in the building and additonal labor because of winter construction. If the units are started before winter and no heat required, etc. this would of course be reflected in the final price. All other terms of our original proposal would remain the same. Submitted by: Goodwin Builders, Inc. Gary T. Goodwin MEMO • TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director RE: Approval of bills DATE: July 11, 1980 I recommend that you approve the bills as listed on the tentative agenda for the July 15,1980 meeting of the HRA. In addition to the listing of the amount and pur- pose of each expenditure you may wish to know the fol- lowing: a. 'Bills related to notorial commission would • only be incurred if the HRA approves such a commission for. the HRA Director. b. Payment of May billing for Von Klug and Assoc- . iates would leave a total of $1,611.81 until their revised contract maximum fee is reached. Two businesses have not yet filed relocation claims for the Fourth and Minnesota Neighbor- hood Revitalization Project. c. Paymentof.partial estimate voucher. number 6, for the Kmart water tower will leave a total of $215,673 remaining to be paid from the original contract and change order amounts. • _ h 1 � a ( ts tJ �a d~ :Y T :', !� �7. 1 �i4.d' f.AW ,:� 1:i !•J' -: �Irt','� JUN 2 0 1980 CUT OF SHAKOPEE June 18, 1980 To: Tim Keane & Committee Members on Subdivision guidelines From: Anne Tuttle Due to the scheduled dates for meetings 1 feel that I must resign from the committee. Being tied up for more than half of the alloted time span I do not feel that I would be doing justice to the work expected of me as a committee member. I sincerely thank you for your understanding and hope that the committee work goes smoothly. Since ely, o onr 67%_ Anne Heimkes Tuttle • OV/ RAHR MALTING CO. RECEIVED JUL 11980 SINCE 1847 /� I� p/ �°C GENERAL OFFICES, 567 GRAIN EXCHANGE, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55415, PHONE 612/335.6874 C' 1 ! O� SHA ^ ®rGG Guido R. Rahr, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer i • June 30, 1980 • Mr. Harold Ring, Chief Shakopee Fire Department 1124 East Third Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Mr. Ring • I have recently been informed by Mr. Bill Runge of the very prompt and efficient response of the Shakopee Fire Department to our recent call at the malthouse. While we were grateful that the emergency was not more serious, we were very impressed by the excellent service provided to us. If this is the high quality of the Shakopee Fire Department, then the City is indeed fortunate to have such a dedicated organization. Would you be good enough to convey our total corporate appreciation to all of your associates. Sincerely Guido R. Rahr, Jr. Copy: The Honorable Walter Harbeck Mayor of Shakopee City Hall Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 6 SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 7 ) 1 1L1 BURNSVILLE•EAGAN•SAVAGE iI j - INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 191 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CENTER June 2, 1980 .. Walter Harbeck, Mayor • City of Shakopee . 129 E. 1st . Shakopee, MN 55379 • Dear Mr. Harbeck: Minnesota Statute 275.125, Subdivision 8, permits school districts to levy a per capita tax if the district has an established community services program . and has established a community services advisory council. District 191 has the program and a council, However,' beforea district may make the levy, another provision of the statute must be adhered;to. A certificate of compliance must be filed with the Commissioner of Education. Compliance means that a meeting has been scheduled between the school district and "members of 'the governing bodies of the counties, municipalities, and townships in which the school district, or any part thereof', is located in order to discuss methods of increasing mutual cooperation between such bodies." Because District 191 is located, in part, in your area, an. elected member, or members of your governing body is (are) invited to attend the required meeting at the District 191 Administrative Services Center, 100 River Ridge Court, Burnsville, MN, on Monday, June 2.3, at 7:30 p.m. We would encourage you to designate a municipal employee or an appointed member of your governing body to attend the meeting if an elected official is not available. This meeting will be a part of the regularly scheduled Community Services Advisory Council . Meeting. Please call the Community Services office 887.7217, to let us know if you or a designate will be able to attend this meeting. S5) - l . 'L. d 4�ch ` Assistant Superintendent FIECEIVED <;--,-- �.! --,- JUN 0 3 1980 . 80 Thomas Lisec Community Services Director CITY OF SHAKOPEE • • 100 RIVER RIDGE COURT • BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 • (612)887 -7300 . An Equal Opportunity Employer - , REC P'Rf JUL j .L u u 'Z 1 Cniteb Zf af.ez - enaf e WASHINGTON. D.C. 20510 CITY OF SHAKOPEE June 25, 1980 The Hon. Walt C. Harbeck Mayor, City of Shakopee 129 E. 1st Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Mayor: Thanks for contacting me to express your concern over the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LAWCON). I appreciate the time you have taken to inform me of your views on this important issue. As you know, President Carter's rescission request of 50% of the LAWCON appropriations caught Minnesota two weeks before its entire allocation of $5.2 million would have been submitted to the Heritage' Conservation and Recreation Service of the Department of Interior. Those states which submitted earlier got theirs, Minnesota and many others are left out in the cold. I am sure you will agree that this leaves Minnesota, and those other states, in a very unfair situation. We went through all this in my work on the Budget Committee and included the LAWCON money in coming up with a sensible budget approach. So while I like to save money, I am opposed to the President's rescission request. In fact, Dave Durenberger and I recently testified together before the Interior Subcommittee of the Senate Appropriations Committee urging that the LAWCON appropriations for Fiscal Year 1980 be fully funded. Right now, the future of the reinstitution of full funding for the LAWCON appropriations rests in a supplemental appropriation bill which should come up for Senate consideration June 25, 1980 Page 2 sometime in June. I can assure at I will strongly urge my colleagues to support this so t nesota will receive the funding it fairly deserves. Once again, thanks for ge in touch. ncerely, °udy Bo°.chwitz ited States Senator RB /sa } MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council t- TAD FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator RE: Tabled 3.2 Beer Licenses DATE: July 11, 1980 7 (a) The application for On Sale 3.2 Beer License for the Velodrome I was tabled at the meeting of June 24th due to their insurance papers not being included with the application. All information is in order, a motion to approve the application and grant an On Sale 3.2 Beer License would be appropriate. 7 (b) To date, we have received no further or new information on the application for a Off Sale 3.2 Beer License for Brooks Superette.• If no further information is received by the City Council meeting of July 15., this will have to remain on the table. However, if everything is in order by that date, a motion to approve the application and grant an Off Sale • 3.2 Beer License should be considered. DSR:plk • • r a- ::.u: Yew.....+ i:,,,, .nKai,e�e,,.wsrn...n+.rn #+»:w• . _ ... z .. _ . 7 (1, • MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre, Administrative .n:;:ii.stanL RE: HUD 701 Planning Grant DATE: July 11, 1980 It is necessary for the City Counci 1 to adopt a Resolution approving the submission of the HUD 701 Planning Grant discussed at the July 1, 1980 Council meeting. 1 have prepared the attached resolution for Council consideration. JA:plk • • • 3 1 t /j Te RESOLUTION NO. 1653 AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR • HUD 701 PLANNING GRANT WHEREAS the Metropolitan Council has advertised for proposals for projects to be conducted under the HUD 7C1 Grants to Localities; and WHEREAS capital improvement programming is a project which will receive funding priority; and WHEREAS the City of Shakopee would like to develop a capital improvement program which has been thoroughly researched and reviewed by all appropriate parties and has been evaluated as to its financial impact; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF Sl IAKOPEE, SHAKOPEE MINNESOTA, application be made under the HUD 701 Grants to Localities to undertake a capital improvement program at a projected cost of $17,419.00, of which $10,000.00 will be requested under the grant, and $7,419.00 will be paid by the City of Shakopee. % BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that appropriate officials are hereby authorized to execute the appropriate documents. Adopted in Regular Session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST:. City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1980. • City Attorney DATE: July 10, 1980 CASE: PC 80 -26P • (,':"= ITEM: Preliminary and Final Plat Approval APPLICANT: Wallace Bakken & Associates; ACE Realty Co. LOCATION: Highway 101 and Marschall Road ZONING /LAND USE: B -1 Highway Business, AG (Agriculture) /Va AREA: 4.6 acres APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Chapter 12, Subdivision Regulation Section 11.29 Land Use Regulations PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED FROM 6/26/80 CASE HEARD BY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO THE C1.TY COUNCIL CASE HEARD ON: July 15, 1980 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary and Final Plat approval of a re -plat of the Halo 2nd Addition. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY: Surrounding Land Uses: North - AG, Agriculture /Vacant South - B -1, Highway Business /A& W Drive Inn East - B -1, Highway Business/ Trailer Park West - B -1, Highway Business /Perkins Restaurant Land Use Plan: Commercial History: The original Halo 2nd Addition received Final Plat approval on July 3, 1979, subject to the following conditions: 1) Favorable Title Opinion by the City Atorncy -2) Park Dedication be in cash. 3) Developers execute a Developers Agreement which Agreement shall include: a) Addition of a waterni in loop easterly to the 6" watermain. b) Acceptable deceleration lane c) Installation of a sidewalk along Highway 101 and Marschall Road. 1 1) A 10' utility and drainage casement be provided on all lot lines. Case # PC -26P -2- July 10, 1980 URBAN SERVICES AVAILABILITY: Storm Sewer: On Marschall Road Sanitary Sewer: Tie in to existing sanitary sewer north of plat within proposed 8" PVC pipe. Water: Water looped to 8" main on Marschall. Road and 6" main on 1st Avenue. CONSIDERATIONS: 1) This request was tabled at the June 26th Planning Commission meeting pending the submission of drainage, street and utility construction plans, and correction of necessary easements. 2) The City Engineer has reviewed and approved the drainage plan subject to the submission of ponding and drainage easements. As approved, the drainage will run to the north and pond on Lot 4. These easement for drainage and ponding may be vacated when permanent facilities are provided to accommodate the drainage from Lots 1, 2 and 3 across Lot 4. 3) The City Engineer finds the entrance to the MWCC property to have a 10 - 13 percent slope which will be difficult if not impossible for MWCC sludge trucks to negotiate. The City Engineer recommends re- design of this drive. 4) The Fire Chief recommends a 20' emergency vehicle easement across the eastern most property line of Lot 3 in order to get emergency vehicles to Lot 4. 5) Staff recommends that access to T.H. 101 be controlled to: a) A'one -way 24' common drive entrance between Lots 2 and 3 b) A one -way 12' exit on the East side of Lot 3 and the West side of Lot 2. c) Lot 1 be restricted to Marschall Road. 6) The applicant has submitted a Letter of Intent (note attached) indicating that the necessary easements will be submitted concerning: a) Emergency vehicle drive b) MWCC Drive c) Power line on North side of Lot Vii. 7) The City requests a trail and farm equipment easement across Lot 4 rather than a right of trespass as indicated in the Letter of Intent. -Case No. 80 -26P -3- July 10, 1980p Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Preliminary Plat approval of Hal 2nd Addition, conditioned on: 1) Submission and approval by the City Engineer of the construction plans for utilities, sidewalk and street improvements. 2) Submission of easements for: a) A 20' emergency vehicle access drive on the East side of Lot 3. b) Drainage and ponding. c) Trail and farm equipment easement across Lot 1 1. d) Utility lines. 3) Driveway locations approved by the City Engineer. TK /jiw • m )d r1VOS NOI1V001 101 'QM . 74q.4N: Gob .1. ei •'/•2. • –7, . . •ef,...k 40( • Hi____. , i_VCI H3N0111.1. r- }..ta,--2-,..(4_, ) _ ,_..... - , • ,--- • I t . ,....._____i (i) -- • Aintin ! ! .... ,, ......,.b.t.....:. • • 411111■ — . t . .. :. 3 - ' • .4 ogtiVA aarvp ' . Jvck ... NkttS4,141 • AtiO4. V' VW . 1%". , , \ r III 11/ 111 1' ij 1 • ' . • • • -:::-. sow - ' •• . . ., V.;0 11•4P4 , '....' . ''' Iril P k,„,iresoo 1 .„.. ii.'• ., !Xi I TO' J , !.•%, • . ......:. . il ■.. 1 ■ , , liiii • - vi . . . MM. 1 • OMR VA 1 • ;'• On- - , f 11 40 i otatt .4W14 '1'It' l ,. P , . ,, xtit 0. k •-pe . ' ".."--1.1 . 7.. • t .... i • 9, • ti:i ;•„'..'-i'•. a , vx 1, 1 ,9 i 9, !!-I--- , t i• , t'.. .......— ....,..r, . ....,_--. 1 1 • ' __-------- - 4. --------- . Ili _ _ - - I . i 10 4Nmpe:;t,-.i , rA: '' • 6,. ..V. .. . • .... „ '. t .• r• .... ■-------- : 1 • I ...-....., ,ti ---- • . ,'Y'' ,. .e ."••••••-• 4!ir'Illr1 3 4C 5 ' ' ..• ...• fi ,,................ :- '... "i"'" ....... •.'.1!' '410 ..,. '' • ' :..::...:::-:.•: a 'ffli:iNg ' ji" ::.: - ...-47L5,7: ,„.,.. ..::' 1 •:... .."--""'''.% 11 , ::::.:M; , .,1, ,,-? ' . pew.,... , ....,.. .r:.. , ....,...r ;. r. - : . :4, •z i: ...•,,,,,,:,,,,,,,,;., ....,.,-••,.:,--".•-• .......... . . . f , ‘ ,.f • eii;L . ,y:: , :'''''' •••• . t Al! j \ \ \' . ..,/.../'- A .4. ry .....: ,<!i!!".. ,gk':.'-,;;:.::,:,:--i.i.Ii,:::;:i...i" , • -.. ...,......1..V.'fiSlij'" ..-_--- 1 ..--."--- -..,...:,.., ..-----"' ' .) ? /**-' .......,...-.-•- , . • . - . __..-- .,..._,,,, ,..' ....".. • - - '---.. — • ..t - ---‘•••......14:Z.7,,,,.: ---_-__—_.—.........„ • ••■=4.4,... ,1 , .-------- ... = - I ----.:7----------- -■•--. .. ..‹":;...` . :n - ... . . . ....._____, .. -... ---•• • - - 17 . ...., • .. . . • 9^ � - l/l��KJ �� K�/\ yJ ' �� /\ K] |/Z| EAST FOURTH AVENUE � • ���^�v .'^. �,�/ `�,� `�v S|/x�0/'[[ • MINNESOTA ��)y. • ' , TB- July 3, @z. Tim Keane Shakopee Planning Director • 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, BN 55373 Re: Wallace D. Bakken -Application for preliminary and final plat approval for • Halo Second Addition--July 10, 1980. - Application for Conditional Use Prcmii'--`uly 10, 1980. Dear Mr. Keane: On behalf of Mr. Bakken please consider the following as a "Letter • of Intent", upon which the City may rely, in considering he above Applications. " 1. On or before recording the above plat, a fifteen foot easement will be recorded across proposed Lot 3, in form of Lot 4, for purposes Of providing emergency vehicle access t0 Lot 4 icoxHighoay 101. 2. On or before recording the above plat, an easement for driveway purposes acceptable to the MeLzOpU]iLon•Waate Control C[mniasiOd'(MWCC) will be recorded. Said easement will connect the pumping station with Mazsoball Road. Utility easements acceptable to the MWCC across Lots 1 and 4 shall also he pro- vided. 3. Until such time as Lot 4 is GevelcYys Lhe City will ta given a temporary ease/ over the H oo� Lh 8O F fr O[ Lhc r ast ]66,]5 feet (approximately) for purposes of wintaining existing [oec lines and of pcoVidiog a pOnding area for stofmenLer drain- age. A recordable instrument with legal description will be pro- vided on or before the date on which the plat is recorded. 4. With respect to the property being considered for a Conditional Use Permit: a. The City shall have the right of trespass for purposes of access to Meox}zial Park until such time as the City locates and identifies the type of access ease- naaot it may require. At such time, said easement will be provided in recordable form with the understanding that all survey work, construction costs, and main- tenance necessary in connection with said easement shall be the responsibility of the City. jt i� Mr. Tim Keane Page 2 July 3, 1980 b. The individual presently using s..i:iu1 property, for • . purposes of access to farmland lying Northeasterly of said property, shall have the right of trespass . for the same purposes over the subject property. c. Any use of said property shall be subject to making available a portion thereof for use by the State Trail. Systems, at such time as it is located. d. The Conditional Use Permit to be granted will be subject to Final Site Plan approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to the granting of Building permits. It is understood that this pro- cedure is necessary because of 1) The necessity of obtaining appropriate permits from DNR and the Corps of Engineers; 2) The possibility of acquiring additional property from the MWCC which may affect the Final Site Plan. • 3) The probability that the site will have to be developed in phases because of its size and complexity. 4) The fact that a substantial portion of the property lies in the flood plain which may substantially affect the proposed use in a manner presently unknown until appropriate requests for. permits • •are made to the above • state and federal agencies. Please be sure to let me know if there are any other information or supporting materials which you may need in order to give due conside- ration to the above Applications. I will be happy to provide them. Thank you. / ,very, ruly, John M. anahan JMM /kkk cc: Wallace D. Bakken James R. Hill • Sam Wetterlin { MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council _ - --- 4 . FROM: Tim Keane City Planner RE: Brooks Rezoning (PC 80 -22R) DATE: July 10, 1980 The applicant in the Brooks Superette case No. PC -80 -22R, has withdrawn the request for a rezoning from R -4 to B -1; parcel located at the Southeast corner of.County Road 17 and County Road 16. Staff expects to receive and file written verification of this withdrawal. TK/jiw .. J . 1 RESOLUTION NO. 16 . A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT 79 -1 WHEREAS, a contract has been let for the improvement of: Park Ridge Drive between Hauer Trail and the Railroad tracks by bituminous surfacing, watermain, and.sanitary sewer service and the contract price for such improvements is $ and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvements amount to $ so that the total cost of the improvements will be $ and of this cost the City will pay $ as its share of the cost. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY T]IE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that: 1. The cost of such improvement to be specially assessed is hereby declared to be $ 2._ - The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every as lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The City Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the City Council. thereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: 1. That a hearing shall be held on the 5th day of August, 1980, in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 8:15 o'clock PM to pass upon such proposed assessments and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements and proposed assessments will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the Resolution No. 1648 Page Two 7 official newspaper of the City of Shakopee at least two weeks prior • to the hearing and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvements. He shall also cause mailed notice of such hearing to be given the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. Adopted in session of the City Council. of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of July , 1980. Mayor 'of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1980. City Attorney • • } (13 RESOLUTION NO. 16)19 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT 79 -7 WHEREAS, a contract has been let for the improvement of: County Road 83 from the Shakopee Velodrome to the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Valley 'Park 3rd Addition, by watermain and sanitary sewer and the contract price for such improvements is $ and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvements amount to $ so that the total cost of the•improvements will be $ and of this cost the City will pay $ as its share of the cost. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI-IE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA; that: 1. The cost of such improvement to be specially assessed is hereby declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of this proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. That the City Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the City Council. thereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: 1. That a hearing shall be held on the 5th day of August, 1980, in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 8:15 o'clock PM to pass upon such proposed assessments and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements and proposed assessments will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the Resolution No. 1649 Page Two official newspaper of the City of Shakopee at least two weeks prior to the hearing and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvements. He shall also cause mailed notice of such hearing to be given the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. Adopted•in session of the City Council of the Cit of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1980. • Mayor of the Cit of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1980. City Attorney • • RESOLUTION NO. 1650 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF MACEY SECOND ADDITION • WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee has approved the Final Plat of Macey Second Addition and has recommended its adoption; and WHEREAS, all notices of hearings have been duly sent and .posted and all persons appearing at the hearings have been given an opportunity to'be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council has been fully advised in all things. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, that the Final Plat of Macey Second Addition; lying within the osuthwest quarter of Section 6, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of Macey Plat, as platted and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota; thence N 0 degrees 43 minutes 15 seconds W bearing assumed. alongthe westerly line of said Macey Plat, ' a distance of 388.58 feet; thence N 86 degrees 47 minutes 39 .seconds E along said westerly line, a distance of 31.65 feet; thence N 9 degrees 57 minutes 41 seconds W.along said westerly line, a distance of 188.56 feet to the northwest corner of'Lot 1, Block 1, said Macey Plat; thence S 79 degrees 41 minutes 01 seconds W,.parallel with 4th Avenue, a distance of 51.65 feet; thence N 10 degrees 43 minutes 59 seconds W, a distance of 51.60 feet; thence S 79 degrees 41 minutes 01 seconds W, parallel with said 4th Avenue, a distance 40.15 feet; thence N 10 degrees 43 minutes 59 seconds W a distance of 158.39 feet to the southerly line of said 4th Avenue; thence S 79 degrees 41 minutes 01 seconds W along said southerly line a distance of 212.81 feet; thence • S 10 degrees 43 minutes 59 seconds E a distance of 130.04 feet; thence S 79 degrees 41 minutes 01 seconds W a distance of 207.12 feet to the easterly line of Market Street; thence S 10 degrees 45 minutes 39 seconds E, along said easterly line, a distance of 62.10 feet; thence S 0 degrees 43 minutes 15 seconds E along said easterly line, a distance of 100.00 feet; thence N 87 degrees 34 minutes 38 seconds E, a distance of 182.99 feet; thence S 0 degrees 43 minutes 15 seconds E, parallel with the westerly lines of Lots 3, 4, and 5, said Block'.1, distance of 265.85 feet; thence S 66 degrees 08 minutes 17 seconds E, a distance of 355.63 feet to the point of beginning. be and the same hereby is approved and adopted with the requirements • • that; • 0 • 1) Favorable Title Opinion by City Attorney. 2) Deeding of Outlot "A" to the City for future sale, with proceeds to be used for park purposes, if allowed under HUD regulations in effect at the time of sale. 3) Outlot "A" be graded so as not to increase the historical run -off to properties to the North. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mayor and City Administrator be and the same are hereby authorized and directed to execute said approved Plat. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Resolution No. 1650 is hereby repealed in its intirety. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,•Minnesota, held theis day of 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1980. City Attorney 4 7G MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre Administrative Assistant RE: Resolution No. 1585, Final Approval of Macey's Second Addition DATE: May 29, 1980„ The above resolution established three conditions for final approval of Macey's 2nd Addition. The second condition is as follows: 2) Outlot "A" is accepted in lieu of cash for Park Dedication. I feel that the above statement does not accurately reflect the discussion regarding Park Dedication for this plat, and could easily be misinterpreted as dedication of Outlot "A" as a park. In fact, the final decision regarding this parcel is that: a) It would be deeded to the City; b) City would hold the parcel until utilities are installed in Market Street and the parcel could • • be reasonably developed; c) When the parcel is sold the City would use the • proceeds to purchase parkland, if this use of funds acceptable under HUD regulations in effect at that time. The above discussion is more accurately reflected in the condition stated below: 2) Deeding of Outlot "A" to the City for future sale, with proceeds to be used for park purposes, if allowed under HUD regulations in effect at the time of sale. Therefore, I recommend that the Council adopt Resolution No. which recinds Resolution No. 1585 and approves the final plat of Macey's 2nd Addition with three conditions, including the revision of the second condition to more accurately reflect the discussion of Park Dedication held at the Planning Commission. This issue has been discussed by the Planning Commission and the Commission has revised the second condition for final plat approval in line with this recommendation. JA / j iw . • RESOLUTION NO. 1652 7 01 • A RESOLUTION DENYING A REQUEST FOR A REZONING BY THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION WHEREAS, the City Staff, at the Planning Commission meeting raised questions concerning the compatibility with the Land Use Plan and the potential impact on Residential land values which could ' result from the rezoning from R -4 to I -1 in P.C. 80 -20R; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on P.C. 80 -20R on June 19, 1980 and all persons in attendance were given the opportunity to speak; and WHEREAS, the Shakopee Planning Commission unanimously reco- mmended denial of the rezoning from R -4 to I -1 in P.C. 80 -20R based on: - not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan - potential impact on property values ( - rezoning has the characteristics of an illegal spot zonin WHEREAS, the members of the City Council discussed the proposed rezoning at its July 1,1980 meeting and took action to denying tie request .Unanimously with one abstention; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, that the rezoning request the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (P.C. 80 -20R), for the East 326 feet of the North 500 feet of the NE4 of SWk of Section 5- 115 -22, which property lies about one quarter mile East of the Valley Cemetary, is hereby denied for the following reasons: - not consistant with the Comprehensive Plan - potential impact on property values - the- rezoning has the characteristics of an illegal spot zoning Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of July, 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk • Approved as to form this day of July, 1980 • • City Attorney MEMO /0 iLle it TO: Dougals S. Reeder, City Administrator FROM: Nathan 0. Wittenberg, Intern- Administrative Assistant RE: Maxi -Audit Grant Application DATE: July 9, 1980 • The maxi -audit is the third step of a series of energy data gathering and reporting procedures. The previous steps are the build ing energy report (completed) and the mini - audit (completed). The maxi -audit is a detailed engineering analysis performed on a building to identify energy conservation measures appropriate for that building. Installations or modifications to the buildings energy consuming systems to reduce the overall energy consumption (including solar energy and /or other renewable resource systems)are energy conservation measures. A primary objective of the maxi -audit is to quantify the economic and engineering feasability of energy saving improvements. The energy conservation measures suggested are to be based on a complete understand- ing of how the energy is used and abused within the facility. The consultant who did the mini - audits on the Shakopee buildings recommends that we apply for maxi - audits on all seven buildings since the state will make the determination on what buildings will receive the grant. Federal grants for maxi - audits are awarded on a competitive basis. If the number of applications exceed the federal budget for grants, a ranki' process will be used to determine which buildings will receive grant awards There are two groups of applications: 1) Eligibleschools and hospitals compete for maxi -audit grants 2) Eligible units of local government and public care institutions compete for maxi -audit grants. The Minnesota Energy Agency will rank applications within each group and recommend the best from each group to the Department of Energy for grant awards. • Here are the criteria we use to rank maxi- audits: 1. Gross energy consumption in Receives 80% weight in Btus per gross square foot our ranking process of building space per year 2. Annual energy costs in Receives 20% weight in dollars per gross square our ranking process foot of building space per year 1 MEMO • TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator FROM: Nathan O. Wittenberg. RE: Maxi -Audit Grant Application DATE: July 9, 1980 PAGE -2- The Institutional Buildings Grants Program will provide financial assistance for maxi- audits. Maxi - audits are required for any eligible institution participating in the grants program. The Minnesota Energy Agency strongly encourages schools, city and county governments, hospitals and public care institutions to conduct maxi - audits. An energy conservation measure will cost money when it is first installed but will save money over time. A determination of the economic feasibility of each energy conservation measure is a requirement for project funding under the Institutional Buildings Grants Program. The maxi -audit will determine if the savings will outweighs the costs of the improvement and how long it would take. • • • - t EXISTING BUILDING ENERGY REPORT 0.. r ,- BUILDING NAME /, NAME OF ORGANIZATION r DATE / 0 _ BUILDING ADDRESS I ADDRESS �- `C, ` 1,_ CITY ZIP CODE CITY ZIP CODE t- 4 Z. 1— PERSON COMPLETING FORM TEL PHONE \ CONTACT PERSON \ TELEPHONE r PRIMARY USE (SEE TABLE 1 ON PAGE 2) _,___.. ___. __. -- -MY~ -� YEAR BUILT : ` YEAR REMODELED j 2 GROSS FLOOR AREA - SQ. FT. GROSS VOLUME - CU. FT. HEATED AREA - SQ. FT. COOLED AREA - SQ. FT. 5 //c l'512. C' 7''c% _ 70 0 j r % i t! 0 STORIES ABOVE GRADE STORIES BELOW GRADE TYPICAL STORY I-IT. - FT. TOTAL BLDG. HT. - FT. `'Z � - - - - -- - - -- /(: t TYPE NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER AVG. NO. OF AVG. NO. OF LIGHTING SUPPLY & MECHANICAL cI O OF OF OF OF OF FULL -TIME PART -TIME SYSTEM EXHAUST COOLING :: w DAY OCCUPIED OCCUPIED OCCUPANTS OCCUPANTS FANS EQUIPMENT ;` a DAYS /WEEK DAYS /YEAR HRS /DAY HRS /WEE .1 r. HRS /DAY HRS /DAY HRS /DAY L vll i !� C � 7t�': v�'E Y , WORK � d 0 \ J A 1 `� r l 0 WORKDAY — ( (.\ l f l r' c),,, J 1 - ]`j �1. 1_I \% ` d. I i ! (-.) / n I ` !i CHECK BUILDING LIST EXTERIOR BUILDING LIST EXTERIOR CHECK SEGMENT SURFACE AREA -SQ. FT. APPROPRIATE ITEM SEGMENT SURFACE AREA - SQ. FT. APPROPRIATE ITEM I •J .,. Q Lei >. ' Q OPAQUE WALL / / % ( ✓ OYES •YES i u INSULATION: ONO OPAQUE ROOF 0/ 7 CJ INSULATION: ONO �, GLAZING: SINGLE 1 CC GLAZING: ❑SINGLE WALL GLASS ❑DOUBLE ❑TRIPLE SKYLIGHT C� — --- --- .- .---- -.__.. - _,_- _-- _..__- ❑DOUBLE ❑TRIPLE ': r O ' J O V E R A L L / _C. OVERALL ROOF - C) / —JCl — � PRIMARY - -- SECONDARY WINTER -- SUMMER L. FUEL (ENERGY) FUEL(S�`_. F. DB % R.H. DB % R.H. • . __ :: If �� // � —y j Q } - EATING H /vi 7/ • ii/ c�,• u) r OCCUPIF.O; / r - / / 1 2 O HOURS 1 / r) 2 I O - ... -. _.._._._..._.._.__,_.._..... ». _.._ w NON L • I a COOLING • I. `.. ' ` f = OCCUPIED ' ^ t . 7 _ HOURS ( / f 1. ALL -AIR SYSTEMS 3. ALL -WATER SYSTEMS 5. RADIANT PANEL SYSTEMS g L1 :\_•;/ PRESSURE: 1 BSI LOW 1 ❑ FAN -COIL UNITS WITH 1 HEATING EQUIPMENT /UNITS LLLJJJ 1 0 LOCATION: 1 0 IN BUILDING ( 2 MEDIUM INFILTRATION AND 2 ❑COOL.ING 3 C HIGII EXHAUST 3[]COMI3INATION 2 ❑REMOTE VOLUME: 4 X CONSTANT 2 ❑ FAN -COIL UNITS WITH l TYPE 3 ❑WARMAIR FURNACE • S� VARIABLE WALL APERTURES BOILERS: 4 ❑ LP HOT S WATER 30 VALANCE UNITS G. HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEMS ZONE: 5 ❑ LP STEAM 6 ❑ HP STEAM ( 40 RADIATION 1 ❑'fl•IERMAL WHEEL G ❑ SINGLE 20 RUN-AROUND-COIL FIRING: 7 DIRECT 7 0 SINGLE VV/REHEAT 30 HEAT PUMP �� 8 INDIRECT • 8 MULTI ZONE 4 DOUBLE BUNDLE.CONDENSE H 9 HEATERS • 9 ❑ DOUBLE DUCT /CV BOXES 5 ❑HEAT PIPE w 10 ]HEATING COILS . 10 ❑ DOUBLE DUCT /VAV BOXES 4. MULTIPLE UNIT OR 60 ATMOSPHERE COOLING 11 ❑RADIATION 11 ❑ VARIABLE AIR VOLUME UNITARY SYSTEMS (ECONOMIZER CYCLE) °- 12 K., ROOF =TOP FURNACE 12 U VAV W /REHEAT 1 ❑WINDOW AIR _ 5 13 �INFRARED HEAT L 13 ❑ INDUCTION CONDITIONERS 7. OTHER SOURCES ww 2. COOLING EQUIPMENT /SYSTEM 2 ❑PACKAGED TERMINAL SOLAR: 1 ❑ DOMESTIC HOT 0 LOCATION: 1 ❑ IN BUILDING A IR CONDITIONS 2 ❑REMOTE -� m WATER 2 ••-I 2. AIR -WATER SYSTEMS 3 ❑ ROOFTOP SYSTEMS 2 USPACE HEATING -] TYPE: O PIPE CHANGEOVER 4 ❑UNITARY AIR p U 2 ❑THREE PIPE CONDITIONERS 3C�SPAC[ COOLINC; p 3 ❑CENTRIFUGAL c1 1 ❑ TW 4ElSWIN1MINGP001_ U 07 s 40 RECIPROCATING • - .1 3 ❑ FOUR PIPE 5 ❑ WATER -LOOP HEAT 51 MAY, E -UP AIR r a. 4 ❑SECONDARY WATER PUMPS ❑ ABSORPTION 5 ❑INDUCTION G ❑AIR TO AIR HEAT PUMPS 6❑GARBAt;IErCOVERY PROM: 7 STAGE W n G ❑DUAL. DUCT INDUCTION O 7 ❑ChiILLED WATER WITH ❑SAWOU T (WOOD) Z 8 ❑ WELL WATER 7 0 FAN COIL WiT 8❑CORNSTALK L- 9 DX COOLING PRIMARY AIR 9 ❑WIN: POWER _ = U < CONDENSERS: 12 IR COOLED = LJ 10 WATER COOLED 13 ❑COOLING 11 DWELL WATER ' TOWER 14 00THER . p � • FUEL TYPES. UNITS OF MEASURE /• o-1 sue. • • FIRM GAS • DISTILLATE OIL (N 1, 2, 3) • PURCHASED STEAM • • INTERRUPTIBLE GAS • RESIDUAL OIL (1/ 4, 5, 5) CHOICE OF UNITS OF MEASURE: • PROPANE UNITS OF MEASURE: FUEL CF —CUBIC FEET OF GAS • BUTANE. L.BS -- POUNDS OF STEAM CCF — THERMS OR HUNDREDS OF UNIT OF MEASURE: MI_B-- THOUSANDS OF POUNDS OF STEAM ENERGY CUBIC FEET OF GAS GAL — GALLONS •PURCHASED CHILLED WATER MCF— THOUSANDS OF CUBIC • COAL (INDICATE TYPE) UNIT OF MEASURE: CONSUMPTION FEET OF GAS UNITS OF MEASURE: THR•• -TON HOURS OF REFRIGERATION NOTE: 1MCF = 10CCF = 1000CF LOS OR TONS F L TYPE FUEL TYPE U Xi — '4) l UNIT OF MEASURE STORAGE CAPACITY UNITY OF MEASURE STORAGE CAPACITY MONTH YEAR QUANTITY UNIT OF COST QUANTITY UNIT OF USED MEASURE (DOLLARS) COST USED MEASURE (DOLLARS) July 19 7g _� I ._� - v.. C F -. • 09.4)!$ z Z . 7 $ August 19 / ' 1 1 NI `‘ I $ / , ` S $ September 19 , r 1 3 11 t-- 1 ■ $ 2. $ October 19 1 1 .R 0 — It In /. ) 6 $ s 1 November 19 I I 1 d Y(-, 5 It I( 5 5" . ? S $ 100,, Q.„. 1 1 December 19 11 1 6 .72— / $ i January 19 71 ( / 6• C l j I 1 1 $ G Act . c , 2- $ February 19 1 ( a 5 U q 1 1 1 ` March 19 t ) i i '1 t I I i is SO 2 - a $ April 19 1 i i c �. 11 t' $ --z..47 ,. I 7 . $ Ibt..•:. lu.` May 19 ) ( ff �a lc, I yT. v .�"> $ / / J • 5 June 19 II ` D . 11 $ c7 YEAR f )Ll. L L I LI CC ■ r / $ TOTAL 19 I� try ( ---- - 7 ∎ $ .3 6,2°1 ./r2 7 — • July 19 $ $ August 19 $ September 19 $ $ October 19 $ $ November 19 $ —_— -- $ December 19 $ $ January 19 $ $ February 19 $ - -- '-- $ 1March 19 $ $ April 19 $ $ May 19 $ S June 19 $ -- '. -- - -- - -- — - -- YEAR --- -- S — - - -- — TOTAL 19 $ S i 1 � U. au/Lo/wow^wc U ' ^r� • NAME OF ORGANIZATIQN ��--- -- --- ` . ELECTRICAL __- � UTILITY NAME ���------- -- ----- __-'�__ ENERGY CONSUMPTION n^rs '--'-'__ � -__'-_____ ! ! ENERGY MAXIMUM ocm^wo.Kw ro�sn�^cron `^*ounnw=x� v pwsrsnco/ _ _ (IF METERED) ( COST MONTH ,s^n m�ow^ s) -- . July �9 -- --- ------'---_ -__ S August 19 � � '------�--- � ----- --------------- _ $ September 19 S ___ ___ October 19 January 19 March 19 April 19 May 19 June 19 YEAR August 19 q Mar Ch 0.., MINI -AUDIT REPORT FORM NO. MIN -01 • A BUILDING NAME • NAME OF ORGANIZATION DATE Shakopee Fire Hall City of Shakopee 6 -28 -80 BUILDING ADDRESS ADDRESS 2nd Avenue 129 East First u ( 55379 ,Shakopee 55379 CITY ZIP CODE CITY ZIP CODE � Shakopee U . 4 PERSON COMPLETING FORM TELEPHONE CONTACT PERSON TELEPHONE Randy Smith (612)935 -6901 Jeanne Andre :612)445-3650 Instructions: For blocks 1 and 2 chock the box which best tits the building ownership conditions. For block 3 determine which of the lour categories describes the building type and then within the category check oft the sub category befitting the building function. 1 ANNERSHIP TYPE 3a. SCHOOLS c. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AIANPublic (PUB) ❑Elementary (SCHL -ELM) ❑011ice (LOCG• ❑Non•Profit Association (NAP) OSecondary (SCHL -SECD) OStorage (LOCG-STRG) ❑Coll. or Univ. (SCHL -POST) ❑Service (LOCG•SERV) ❑Vocational (SCHL -VOCL) ❑Librar Agency Y (LOCG 2 ULTIMATE OWNER ❑Education A ounty 9 Y (SCHL -ADMN) ❑police (LOCG•PLCE) �,t (CNTY) ❑Administration WO ❑C Xi.VCit (SCHL -ADMN) Fire ❑City (CITY) (TOWN) ❑OTHER (SCHL -OTHR) OTHER (LOCG•FIRE) p 0 (LOCG•OTHR) 0 r ❑State (STAY) b. PUBLIC CARE d. HOSPITALS 0— ❑Public School O (PUSC) Nurain 9 Homo (PBCR-NURS) ❑General \ (HOSPGENII o m ❑Private School (PRSC) ❑Long Term Caro (PBCR -TERM) ❑Tuberculosis (NOS!' t UGH) ❑Non- Prolil Association (NPAP) ❑Rehab. Facility (PBCR -RHAB) JD OTHER (I•IUSp O fi1H) ❑Indian Tribe ( ❑Public Health Cu. C (PBCR -HCTR) j mw ❑Ras. Child Caro Ctr. (POCR•RCCC) C Instructions: With reference to page 23 entitled Funding Information, determine it the facilities are eligible for both Federal and State funding .ir lust Federal funding. then answer the questions correctly for the situation. This aoction must be signed and dated by the head of the organiratiur. If eligible for both Federal and State Funding: Have you received a mini -audit grant before? ❑ Yes XRi No Have you previously applied for mini -audit funding? l y cis AU N Do you wish to apply for mini - audit funding? C Yes IN No Date Name Signature II eligible for Federal lunding only: Have you received a mini -audit grant before? ❑ Yes No • Have you previously applied for mini -audit lundi ❑ Yes ❑ No Do you wish to apply for mini -audit funding? u Yes ❑ No The 50% match for Federal funds will come Irom: (Use additional sheets if necessary.) ■ l 1 i ti D o Date __ r¢ DU None ao -- T Z Siyna1 __ __ __ ___ . , 60 Check Inc type of energy report which was completed and submitted prior to this mini -audit report. r 0 Elementary School Energy Report (Form No. ED- 00444 -02) O 0 Secondary School Energy Report (Form No. ED 00445 -02) - a a. MExisting Building Energy Report (Form No. EN- 00041 -01) s- Y u 11 an onergy report has not boon completed previous to this mini -audll report, one must be included with this report. Elements 3 vocational schools should use form ED- 00444.02 or form ED- 00445 -02, depending on building complexity, All other buildings should use the existing la w building onergy report. form EN- 00041 -01, Elementary. secondary, and WD 1 Instructions: This section is to be completed and signed by a registered professional engineer or by a certified mini- auditor who has successfully f E i completed the State of Minnesota's Mini -Audit Procedures Course. This section should be completed after thla mini -audit report and en onergy report ! are completed. All blanks must be filled In. I have reviewed the energy report and /or the onergy report results for this building. 1 found all Information contained therein lo be correct OR I have ■ corrected any misinformation on the energy report which will be resubmitted with this mini -audit report to the Minnesota Energy Agency I em not directly responsible for the day to day operations of this building being audited 1 have fully disclosed my financial interests relating to this mini -audit and any energy conservation measures considered by Ih s audit • I have walked through this building and have found the recommendations listed in suction I of this mini -audit report to be the operations and maintenance changes, and low cost energy conservation measures, which would reduce energy consumption in this building. 1 have made a rough estimate. In section G. of the range of savings which may result from the implementation of all 01 the mini -audit oppnrt,rri,tru:. listed in section I. 1 am not responsible if the actual savings resulting from this mini -audit do not fall within the estimated range Based on actual records, the onergy conservation operating and maintenance procedures listed in section K D I J n save at least 20% 01 the building's energy consumption as specified in section 1. ---`' (did. did ( Nfl (di not) Basod»pt(��gn. f ly0 bsorvation of the physical characteristics of this building and the building's lh be the subject of a maxi - audit, major energy using systems. 1 rci,r,rnn and 111./1 this (should, should not) I realize that this is not a finaljudgemont, that the State reserves the right to make the maxi -audit funding determination based on this mini -audit report and other criteria. Based upon the information in section E and the information referred to in suction F, I recommend that this buildm undergo further solar conversion analysis, and /or SHOULD NOT S.1:1 N g � huid, s oulnol) wind. wood. (Circle proper resources) undergo further analysis of the renewable resources wd it (should, should not) In my ludgement, as a mini - auditor, all of the above statements are true and correct. i 1 Witnessed by: • Randy•Smith Mini - Aud 's Name (Prin or Typo) I Building Organizational Authority (Pint ur 1ypul Signature •J 206 `' Signature a ;, Rieke Carroll Muller Associates, Inc. Firm Name (if none, enter none) Oslo _ } P.O. Box 130 Hopkins, MN 55343 Address (612) (35 - 6901 Phone 6 -28 -80 .r D ale I , Ali, .r Wi N h Z I a w . Q W )-- Lt : • 61 /6 r F NAME POSITION ORGANIZATION • Randy Smith Certified Mini Auditor Rieke Carroll Muller Assoc. Inc. • Nathan Wittenberg City of Shakopee • ■- 0 • < 1- BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF GENERAL BUILDING CONDITION (i.o. typo, and function) Good, Fire Station MAJOR CHANGES PLANNED WITHIN NEXT 15 YEARS (i.e. demolition. rehabilitation. convorsion from one building type to another) = None • D STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF ROOF (i.e. metal beams. wooden rafters. concrete) • Z; Metal Trusses p ROOFING MATERIAL (i.e. tar and gravel. shingles. tile) Tar and Gravel H INSTRUCTIONS: Correctly answer the following questions for the building being mini - audited. Is there open tend adjacent to the building? g yes O No Solar collectors need to be located in an unshaded area. Is the root of the building and tha south facing wall unshaded between the hours of 9 a in eriJ 3pm7 Root: XIX Yes 0 South lacing Wall. IN XYes 0 No • .r II ire roof or wall are partly s!+adod. what percentage of the surface is unshaded? % of roof unshaded % of south facing wall unshaded 'r6 • What is the ov_eralt shape of the building? 0 square rectangle 0 H- shaped 0 E- shaped 0 other (spocily) Is Inc fool of the building flat or pitched? kx N 0 pitched • • 11 pitched. what is the compass orientation of the ridgoline? 11 pitched. weal is the angle that the roof makes with horizontal? • Are there la�r a obstructions on the roof such es chimneys. rooms for mechanical equipment, ventilating units. water towers. etc/ XM Yes U No • what is the eater or facing material for the south lacing wall? STUCCO • wnat percentage of the south lacing wall is glass? 0 is the building's space healing equipment located within or on the building? (A no answer indicates the equipment is in a separate building i Yes ❑ No it Inc space heating equipment is inside the building. where is 11 located? Ground Floor U Basement 0 Roof 0 Other (specify) <_ is the building's water healing equipment located within the building? (A no answer indicates the equipment is in a separate budding ) Ayes 0 N z te 0 1- •;.: II Inc water heating eglripmenl is inside the building, where is it located? A Ground (loot U Basement 0 ()the (specify) a � — f, 0 is Inc. water heating system a central system. does it consist of multiple units, or is i1 a combination of the central and multiple units? NZ � Central ❑ Multiple 0 Combination • 62 • / I tnsuuctions Enter the total energy used of oath fuol typo for tho be period and the year when thoro was a 20% or proctor onorgy savings. Indicate the t umt of moasure. Enter the appropriate conversion factor from Appendix 0 to convort onorgy usa90 into Btu's. Bo sure to onter the fiscal years of which the data applies. Rotor to papas 7 and 15 for a complete explanation of this soclion. 1; I OASE PERIOD YEAR Fiscal Yoar ( I: ENERGY TYPE ENERGY USAGE CONVERSION FACTOR BTU USAGE • Eloclricity t 1• Fuel 1 I Fuel 2 • I, TOTAL I I 20% SAVINGS YEAR Fiscal Year ENERGY TYPE ENERGY USAGE CONVERSION FACTOR BTU USAGE Electricity Fuel 1 1 v ! = Fuel 2 i k.c.al TOTAL j instructions. This soction is to bo completed by the mini-auditor akar the walk -thru portion of Iho mini - audit. First. chock the appropriate boxes which • stale the roughly estimatod range of the percent of total oloclrical and fuel consumption which would be saved resulting from the implementation of all of the now mini -audit opportunllios listed in soclion L. Secondly calculate the range of onorgy and cost aavings by multiplying the estimate) I 1 percentages by the annual olectried and teal consumption data on the energy report. �, 1 1 Chock Iwo boxes in each category — ' h I I Range of Electrical Savings — 0% ) 5% ❑ 10% 0 15% ❑ f 1 20% ❑ 2g% other (specify) I Range of Fuel Saving; ••• 0 0% i 5% X,(10% ❑ 15% 0 20% 0 25% ❑ otnor (specily) P., 1 Calculate tangos of e and cost savings — t { Range cal Electrical Savings • of Enorgy ` Annual Electrical Ran g• gy Annual Electrical Rang• of Electrical .‘ 1 % Range Consumption Savings % Range Dollars Spent Dollars Savings 3Q24Q • i lower bound 0 % x kwh = 0 kwh. 0 % x $1345.08 $ 0 E 1 to Ib l0 10 '? upper bound 5 % x 30240 kwh = 1512 kwh, 5 % x 5 1345.08 5 67.25 .r f f irt 3 Range o1 Fuol Savings { Annual Fuel Range of Fuel Annual Fuel P ! f % Range Consump)ion Rangs of n Zf Savings %Range Oollars Spent Dollars Savings ! tower bound 5 % x 14 5 B 72.4x10 6 tu 5 % x $ 3629.62 _• $ 181 .48 t '` 1 ; 1 to . to to to < <:t u ° upper bond 10 x 14 ©ti, = 14.5x10 B 10 x $ 3629.62 $ 362.96 r or. > t- The mini•audaor is not responsible it actual savings rosulting Irom the implomentation of the energy conservation opportunities listed in I do i :4i.; not fall botwoen the roughly estimated ranges which are speeilied, dr`, , N • , n,.., I/ 63> Y� k PPI L Instructions' Read through the energy Conservation recommendation list provided. Then walk through the building with the list. Examine tr.. • suggested maintenance and operational changes. and any other low cost energy conservation measures, that pertain to the facility. As you go alo,:i m u V4 j : record the item number, the Classification number of the recommendation, and the now mini-audit opportunity. The description of the min -adit 1- opportunity should contain tho specific building location where the recommendation applies, it applicable. Any recommendation not found on the t�sl Q ,r ma also be Included. r those roeommen dalten$, Cosign hsn appropricto classification number from the classiltealion scheme for energy • 1/::/;; consetvCtion opporluniti fo r a listed on other page 2S through 97. Tho date Qr implomontalion should only bo completed as the rocommorrdnl,on is implemented. This section of the mini -audit report should be comp!o(od by the mini -audit team during the building walk - through. q-•� OPTI s " `� Q41 OPTIONAL: 'OA CLASSIFICATION �i a4? ITEM NO ENERGY NO MAJOR SUB NEW MINI -AUDIT OPPORTUNITIES 1 ENERGY COST DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION CLASS CLASS SAVINGS SAVINGS N 1 1 1 'ar K - - a 1 con rols free of dust. 2 2 1 Check the amount of insulation in the i`a - ? 3 2 1 Add insulation if needed • 4 2 2 Weatherstrip all exterior doors including garage doors, 5 2 2 Replace an existing door with one of • • a- :- fx 6 2 8 Caul all cracks that allow air and tt moisture into the building. 7 2 8 Insulate walls with rigid insu ation w. on inside surfaces, or place loose fill insulation in wall cavities. 8 2 10 Replace single glazed windows with •• • - glazed thermo•anes. 9 3 1 Check operation of entire heating/ } -- Luling control system. including control valves and dampers. ;R £1 10 3 1 Check the calibration of all controllers ; proper settings and : and devices for pr w operations: - - - 11 3 • 1 Adjust automatic timers or add time —. x clocks to automatically set temperatu -e '' for night and weekend operation. 3 1 Consider regulating the fresh air t •..I• -r ith enthals control so that the building can be cooled with outdoor ! ai6 when this saves energx. o 3 1 65 F maximum occupied, 60 maximum ate • -• d. i • lie heating season. 14 3 1 78 minimum when occupied and no •e •! .e - 1 se e 1 r •- I cooling season. ___ i 15 3 1 Provide atmospheric cooling as long - -. as possible. _ 16 3 2 Clean the air side of all direct - - — radiators, fin tuhP rnnvartnrs and coils to enhance heat transfer. Keep . a a -- oil . a .. a - : e a - foot clearance in front of convectors, f -- rAdiatnrc nr rsgistprs is dPsirahlP 17 3 2 Vent all hot water radiators and •1 - •rs o a ure that water will N..,•• 1 Date of Implementation should only be completed as the recommendation is implemented Tha mini -audit sport may be submitt•d to the M,nn,•$01a E nergy Agency before Iho "Oslo of lmpternentahon' has been completed, 1 Nn1 : Itepn..yuce this page as necessary RS b 61 4 L:..1 In5UVCI,ons Read through the energy conservation recommendation list provided, Then walk Through the building with the list, Exam,n tr..• r• suggested maintenance and operational changes, and any other low cost energy conservation measures that pertain to the facility. As you ,;•, atr,,;: Z record the item number, the classification number of the recommendation, and the now mint -audit opportunity. pportunity. The description of the min •aurtd K opportunely should contain the specific building location where the recommendation applies, if applicable. Any recommendation not found on the list t O may also be mcluded- For those other recommendations, aasi n an a a conservation o 9 ppropnata classification number from the classification scheme for energy • w a opportunities listed on pages 2 5 through 37. The data or implementation should only be completed 23 the recommendation is Y O implemented. fh,s section of the mini•eudit report should,bo completed by the mini -audit foam during the building walk - through. CLASSIFICATION OPTIONAL: OPTIONAL: ITEM NO NEW MINI -AUDIT OPPORTUNITIES t ENERGY ENERGY NO MAJOR SUB SAVINGS COST DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION CLASS CLASS SAVINGS 1 . completely fill the interior passages r 18 3 2 Clean and remove obstructions from al' #, .. 1111 • - il. - , registers, and grillers). ). They .-. • • • . . ' • _ . 11 . 0 • • • • dirt and fore';gn materials. i 19 Make sure that a ens, requent y inoderative in unit heaters, fan coil units, and unit ventilators are runnin• normall to increase the heat -- transfer rate from heating col s. -- -- 20 3 . 3 Keep condenser coil face P ,ace clean to permit •roller air flow. -- _ 21 3 3 Inspect ductwork forair ea age. eaI -aks b taping or caulking. 1 22 3 3 Inspect ductwork insulation. 23 3 3 Inspect damper blades and linkages. I Clean ,oil and ad'ust. J 24 1 11111 3 Take special note of fresh air dampe . - - ,i. in. sure that they close tightl • and be sure to repair, replace or 1 provide blade edge gaskets and •aske . at the end blades. - — 25 3 - 3 Clean or replace place filters perio•7ca • 26 3 Clean all strainers in piping systems • -- • - 1 ure full flow of medium: ) 27 III 3 Check belt tension and alignment on - - -- •m•ressors 28 3 3 Inspect air compressor intake filter - s.. ••• •r replace as necesaa 29 - . 3 3 Check the compressor's oil level. 30 3 3 Periodically drain the moisture from - I .1- .1, 31 4 1 Instruct occupants and main enance personnel to switch off all lights w en ey are no needed. 32 4 3 Clean fixtures and amps re am u ar p g y. 33 4 3 When repainting, use light co ore. paint on ceilngs, walls and floors b t avoid objectionable specular reflections [ from lass finishes. rv.,r•• I Dale 01 Implementation should only be completed as the recommendation is implemented The mini -audit report may be submitted to the 1- 1p Ene,gy Agency before the - Dale of Implementation has been completed. }tue.• rlepr•.:Iuce this page as necessary 65 • n N L M Instructions Read through the energy conservation recommendation list provided. Then walk through the burl0ing with Ine list E.anen,• ,r.• suggested maintenance and operational changes. and any other low cost energy conservation measures. that pertain to the facility As you „r, air,,: :l z record the item number the classification number of the recommendation and the now mini-audit opportunity. m,n unily. The description of the ••a„n,i z opportunity should contain the spec bu locat where the recommendation applies,11 appl Any recommendation not found on the list +' O may also be included. For those other recommendations, assign an appropriate classification number from the classification scheme for energy o. conservation opportunities listed on pages 25 through 37. The data 0f Implementation should only be complotad as the recommendation is • 2 O implemented. This section of the mini -audit report should be completed by the mini -audit team during t building walk - through CLASSIFICATION OPTIONAL; O PTIONAL: ITEM NO NEW MINI -AUDIT OPPORTUNITIES , ENERGY ENERGY NO MAJOR SUB COST DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION CLASS CLASS SAVINGS SAVINGS 34 4 4 se lower wattage lamps to provi.e the necessary illumination. 35 4 4 Allow part of a lighting system to be .-. .ff while maintaining the necessary light. 1 36 5 1 Keep records of the operating schedul ! I i -t- . ./ m• i.n and •urcha.- 1 of any new equipment that affects ene gy � - roneumptinn_of efficiency of the I building. These records will indicat the impart of energy _conservation measure.. 137 5 1 Review the•record books on a regular i s hacis F 38 5 2 Establish a specific maintenance schedule 1 ' for each building to ensure that all i i •- . .. - . " - .- c but .ing ---- i - -• -- operate at maximum efficiency. Consul manufactureers literature for guidanc- ` - '12 ablishin• a maintena,ce schedul-; 39 6 1 Adjust water supply to 100 for all - -x egt s•ecial re•uirements dishwash- .. supply units, etc. . - -- 40 6 2 The burner system of _ - -- -- .- -- y o fosse. fuel ,1 -r heaters should be ke•t clean and in good operating condition. - - - -' 41 7 3 Clean air - sides, remove soot, and scrape E - . - in forced warm air furnaces. 42 3 If the firing rate of gas or oil • hurnPrs is too high it causes short cycling and excessive fuel consumptio . - dl• ., a rate requires constant operating and delivers inadequate hea — - - - to the spaces. 43 4 Schedule boiler blowdown on an as- needled „,- a• • dl i.. •i . fi -d imetabl- Smaller, more frequent blowdown is p - ferab,e • ! • • •- - f -.u-nt blowdown. . 44 4 Maintain the lowest possible hot wet- .. --• temperature which w m -- . ace or domestic hot water needs. -- r , 45 4 If there are no indoor- outdoor modul ting antrnlc, raice nr lnwer the n°eratjl temperature of hot water systems to • II • . lee ... . I . example, operate a boiler 120 wi 1 Date i,f Implementation should only be completed as the recommendation is implemented The mint-audit report may be submitted to the .tn Q:�Yela Eneigy Agency before Inc "Oslo of Implementation" has been completed ? • .,,..:f. ;• 'itepI ,duce Ins page as necessary r:.-. Or ., p y w L F Instructions Read through the energy conservation recommendation list provided. Then walk Through the building with the list Examrnr• rt... t ,,� suggested maintenance and operational changes, and any other low cost energy conservation measures, that pertain to the facility Y As von r:. )alur:ry Hwy {. u a j record the item number, the classification number of the recommendation, and the new mini-audit opportunity. The description of the mm••aurlit ¢ opportunity should contain the specific building location where the recommendation applies. it applicable. Any recommendation not found on the list :. ,- O a may also be included. For those Other recommendations. assign an appropriate classification number from the classification scheme for energy $ conservation opportunities listed on pages 25 through 37. Tho data cr implementation should only be complotod as the recommendation is Z O implemented. This section of the mini-audit report should be complotod by the mini -audit teem during the building walk-through Fili ii CLASSIFICATION OPTIONAL: OPTIONAL: ITEM NO NEW MINI -AUDIT OPPORTUNITIES r ENERGY ENERGY NO MAJOR SUB COST DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION CLASS CLASS SAVINGS SAVINGS 1 1 G • the level to 160 : F w en it is 1 ..39,z outdoors. 46 7 4 Maintain water leve e or pressure o � -�: radiators or coils on the hi•hest .. level of the building. III , 47 7 4 Turn off gas pilots for furnaces, boi s , • ..if •ace heaters duri na the non- -.- heating months and during long unoccu•ied • ,, .. 11- 11 t-' 48 7 4. Keep all heat exchanger surfaces clea Check air -to -fuel ratio and adjust as necessary on unit heaters. A" ikei 49 7 4 Follow guidelines suggested for fan ,f, u• or maintenance. Lp v • - - • M -...-0 a r i .... 0 1T4 r EMI kit • isifee ¢t + lta.'�s. tr rr..,. t Dale of Implementation should only bo completed as the recommandaon is implemented The mini -audit roport may be submitted to the �,Yi' 1d.r,nr.;�ta Energy Agency betnt the - Date of Implementation" has been completed. Wu' nr.rl.• lteprrrnuce this page as necessary 65 • c>, yc , f CITY O SHAK P E 4 l J '�� �"�� ' , N 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Admr. • • • SUBJECT: CR18 Bridge Advisory Committee DATE: 7/10/80 Mayor Harbeck has agreed to represent the•city on this Committee. He has suggested that the City Council should appoint an alternate to serve in his absence. DSR /jsc • • • • • F (2/ DATE: J3.ine 19, 1980 CASE: P.C. 80 -21V ITEM: Variance APPLICANT: Steven Hentges LOCATION: 3055 Hauer Trail ZONING /LAND USE: R -2, Single Family Residential /Single Family Home AREA: .7 acre APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: 11.26 Subd 5.B; 11.04 Subd 5 FINDINGS REQUIRED: 11.04 Subd 5A PUBLIC HEARING CASE HEARD BY PLANNING COMMISSION APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a 5' sideyard setback variance from Section 11.26 Subd. 5.B. of the City Code in order to construct a 22' x 30' garage addition within 5' of his sideyard lot line. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY: Surrounding Land Uses: North - R -2 Urban Residential /Vacant South - R -2, Urban Residential/ Single Family home East - R -2, Urban Residential /Single Family home West - R -2, Urban Residential /Single Family home Land Use Plan: Low density residential CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The property is zoned R -2, Urban Residential. The lot is approximately 120' x 252' (29,736 sq. ft.). 2. The existing house has a 22' x 22' double garage. The site of the proposed addition is presently vacant (the east side). 3. The existing house. is slightly canted on the lot and 27' from the east property line at its nearest point. The 22' wide garage would encroach 5' on the required 10' setback area necessitating this 5' variance request. At the front, the garage would be 7' from the east property line. 4. The neighbor's house to the east is 12 -14 feet from the property line. 5. Section 11.04 Subd 5.A. of the City Code states that a variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: 1. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the • property which do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity, and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of property since enactment of this Chapter have no control. 2. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Chapter would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Chapter. 3. That the special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. /p c ' P.C. 80 -21V • Page 2 4. That granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied .by this Chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. 5. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. 6. The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Chapter, or to property in the same zone. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial of the 5' sideyard setback variance request based on: Lack of findings 1, 2, and 4 as required for granting a variance. TK:nae PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Stoltzman /Vierling moved to amend the variance to grant a 2' setback variance. Motion carried with Comm. Koehnen voting "no" and Comm. Perusich abstaining. Stoltzman /Vierling moved to approve Variance Resolution No. 254, as amended thereby granting a 2' sideyard setback variance for the rear sideyard. Motion carried with Comm. Koehnen voting "no" and Comm. Perusich abstaining. z J «. ` i IS 0 y ` IX 1. 4 • R as I ti it 4 Z Y 'r C Div W TIM 1 I 4, t. 0 —P - ] ( i ,,/ .4 T.- v � d C/ / 4.... ` *V - L l $<<s. . 1' ; 2 i 4 s� - . C S :�a. I r • / 6,710 / M4 r ;� +��'bu ,9' t "4 i • .0:,.. 4///////////1 1 , : " A �� ST. M ' eh lhiw �7 rte i „ x+ V _'FP,✓_ N H fir"G i 6 • 1 c t • 00 :TITIONER DATE 30:f 4 UE -'� 1 • , .-. 0o-- /v 10i9 ' j Jf:C \SE NO. LOT LOCATION SCALE /p • 1 / \ 41 0.7. \ . _-_-' ice-- _ '_� -� � ` _���_ ���M l F 1 � 5T 101 , �� .....A.•°, 445j,-1A2 E . I \ �J�134011114M,' C1 HN GO W 1_��lJr, � 2 s , . oa p P.- .411. V W41 50 11 1 I, , N I AVE. . r AVE. .. N I ,� i` ` _ _ _-- ______ — _ � — W [F F: ! , , 111 a �I WL 62 j 2 N J \ • M 7 ��� 9 h ,„„.... NORTHERN \ _. _. --- -._ ..-1- KILLARNEY , .n . , 11011g"I . HILLS ADD'N ,....„ „,..... \ r "FR \N • \ 1 �— _ • � .� 01 r C.; I D: 18 17 lei �\ s WI— ALD!A_ HILLSIDE ESTATES I ii( y. — 2. 6 is rn on vv • • rirrG,z7 • • 6 - q - go ETITIONER DATE 17. - BD --21v 1 2.000 ' ASE NO. j LOT LOCATION SCALE PG 1 I -7 1 ,-., I f I ' I „ . _.L..._:_ . ,....; .! ; . ' . ; : ; '.... _i .-; ! •;• : -:- /40,•C1•-' ; 1 ± , . ; • ; , , , , ■ 1 ■ , 1 • i , • „ : • , i , 1 '‘, • 1 ..•; , : - • :---i---:- 1 i • .. • , 1: =. . • ... • . :.1 I ill: I.. • , ' ' ' • • , . . • , , i ! • 1 I i i ! 1 1 • ; i I. ■ , 1 , „..9 ' , ' : • • " • i- i , I ; 1 • ; 1 • , , 1 : - -. . ■ - • I -- I s ; 1 i I ; I • I I • : 1 I • • • ; . ; 1 i • . . . • . . • • • , t ; 1 • I 1 ; , 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 ; • • 1 • I I 1 • 1 • -• .1 . . . • , ... . . . .. . .. . , 1 I 1 I • • _ .-.5 ..5t. i (.. . • i I ' , . , . , 1 I . • ,' -- ,J -,:..: i --- i i ' 1 • , , . . . . . • , • , . i v c- I CL r C:' I ; .., 1 .- i i 1 I ' i ■ ' I : 1' 1 ; I ! . ; • I i : ‘ / ' ' ijr ,;;;;r 4 b --;',...=■. ' , a . 1 .. ' .1? : . i '.....)n..4 f.:! i-rh t - . . ■ 1 : • W ,.. L- I . ..- L. , I .. : . . • 70 1 / i 1 • ., . .. itSC Fito . I . • ; • , • . , , 1 • ; I i I ; ___ i I I I__ 1 • • I '1, k fiSiING A 1-. ''' ' APe7ti. I -- l - 7 - • 1 1 --- - , . , . ;] .. , ... , .. --:---1,---- 1----- - . 1 ; , 2 1 ! • , , 1 N .: : . i ... 1 . .. : . . ' 1 I / I L I ! ..1 1 1 I . : ! • , . ; i . 1 I 4 , ; _- ;az i --b 1 , tie , 1 - - . 1 • . 1 1 . ! ! 1 ; A , 5. 1 ; I I , ' • • : , I ; ; i ... ...)4,;--1 U 1 - 'W 1 , ' : I ' N 1 h it V - -- --- --,---. --- 12 - .... ..-- - - 3 ---, - ' : r•1 ' Csi - .i...______: ; _. _..J..._. ! I ; 1 ! I 'l • : ; 1 1 ; I I ! . I i I I I_ I 1 1 • 1 • i . ;. 7 S ii: • 1 I . i ! I I ■ ; , 1 1 1_ I I . — 1 I I .; ! ; ____._ • r ..., --,-- , , ... _,__._ _, _I__ v,...___i___I___....1._..1.._ : . ... 1 • 1 ... i ......._ _ __ _ . 1 . 1 • 1 I1 . ; • : ; • ; ; i i-- - ; - ; i • , , ': -.--1----- 1 1 i , it ' I ; , ; , - 1 • • • . . . . . , . . . . . . • .:: --.1--- - --1- -: - I r 1 1 ; i I 1 • 1, . t ; i i . I , I ' I I . I I . • . . , . 1 • ! i 1 : . . • ', . .. _ ... ._ i , 1 i I I , • I . , . . , ..,........ ___I___. __4 _:. _ n 1--,_ ' , ___L. _I _ _ , • 1 . ; 1 , 1 i I 1 • . . ■ , , ; • • • • . -i - --, ----i. I I ■ • I ,ii ;IL 111111 ; : .. .., (' Ili Nil I I ' --- c... .. . , .7 ()-- I : 1 : I , I 1 I I —7—......... ; ! I .1 ?, ' An. • -,/ ' aas ;'° V -- -- I— .;--- I • I I . 1 . . : . : ; , ' • ! ; ; I : I I 1 1 _ , . , •--- I • 7 77 --__....„ , . , . 1 , , • I i .. ...! 3656 1).1?0 I • : ! I 1 _ . 1 , _ __ _ _ .. ..1....1_ 1 1 . . . t I . ' 1 1,---;----I- - -i- ---1 i . : . 1 • - • ; i 1- •• • ; ; i I •.; ; I „ I • j 'I li 1 I . ; ' i i 1 ' ' ' ; ; ; -;-- 1 - • I I 1 ; ! . • I , I 1 I ; I t ; - I ; . . 1 ! i I !_i ; 1 ; ; ! I ; I I I r 1 I i , -,`% i 1 ... • / I i t n 1 . ....„..____..._ . 1 , , , 1 , c-T.77. i :e___ .).,- i : i LA Z 1 L il tr --- •, ----;- I , • : 1 j i : , , i ; 1 1 , : . 1 -4— ■ i 1 , ii:t • -•S: 4 14. - "4:2• - '1•Erg . t. 5, VX-V i gr•VI.:-.." . .:r ' .2.•1.• . . _•L:. ... . • _ _ ..:, ..”71:-.-......:---,—,—,..••-•...-.........- • --- - • ...... ._ _ .. !IT : ' /6 G. • Mayor Walter Harbeck July llth, 1980 & City Council Members Ladies and Gentlemen: This letter is to state our reasons for opposing the variance granted to Mr. Stephen Hentges by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals at it's June 19th meeting. My wife and I live at 3059 Hauer Trail, and our property abutts the property in question. We were present at the June 19th meeting of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals and at that time, indicated to them our opposition to the variance. We now ask that you review the matter for additional consideration. Hauer's addition is a residential neighborhood made up of predominantly single family dwellings with standard 2 -car garages. The lots are somewhat larger then those in town and the homes are evenly spaced, making the area very scenic. This was one of the reasons we purchased our home here, six years ago. We have spoken with various real estate agents and appraisers, all of whom have stated there is no question that both the scenic.and resale value of our home would be diminished if a garage was constructed as close to the property line as Mr. Hentges intends. In addition, all of our bedrooms are located on the west side of the house and would be next to the proposed garage. As the garage is to be used for a tow truck and towing is a 24 hour a day operation, we feel that noise during evening and early morning hours could be a problem. We feel Mr. Hentges will suffer no hardship if the variance is not granted. He currently has an attached two car garage plus one or more large buildings on the west end of Shakopee. Mr. Hentges was in the towing business prior to purchasing this home on Hauer Trail and if this property did not fit his requirements, q , perhaps should have selected an area more appropriate to his needs. In any event; it is our position that Mr. Hentges should not be allowed • .' 2 to increase the value of his property at the expense of our's. The purpose of theordinance when it was written and adopted, was to prevent this type of situation from occurring. In addition to providing future protection for area home owners. We feel by granting the variance, a precedent will be set that could disrupt the entire neighborhood. Finally, we feel that the Board of Adjustment and Appeals errored when it- granted the variance at it's June 19th meeting. Prior to the decision they were informed by Mr. Tim Keane of the City Planner's office, that Mr. Hentges did not meet any of the criteria set forth in the ordinance and required by law to obtain a variance, he therefore, recommended the variance not be granted. _ The Board chose to disregard his recommendation and grant the variance. We . feel that because the criteria required to gra a variance were not met, that the Board lawfully should not have granted the variance. - We therefore ask that the members df this body reverse the.decision of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals and order the variance not be granted. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Respectfully, Stephen & Maureen Strehlow /a C ' June 25, 1980 Mr. Tim Keane City Planner City of Shakopee Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Sir: This letter is to inform you that my wife and I request a hearing before the City Council to oppose a partial variance which was granted to Mr. Steven Hentges on June 19, 1980, at a special session by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Prior to this hearing, we will submit for review our reasons for objecting to the variance. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Stephen & Maureen Strehlow ) 6 c . 0 • V: :..E:=;:ii: r ._ CI Li 00 d_,S - --t-g, A ' S2 1- t„:„.,1/4 6- P, ) I V-...ck,k._,,,,....) , ,...: i (I I i - Vs ktv■- I . , 6.-...... 1-____. J-ed - lAin 1-4.. --->--0 a z ii.- ao &--„_,j_ r , :_::: 7." •': ? \ CtA., C.:X.....C ; ' ' GL4 ...•-..Q_9 g ( - i - s-- ) 0 L) . Q CLQ., 1- OL_ \-) 0 kk 1 et.,,,t cf_-_ - 63 z2. 7 , r N. - _ . .) : CS-6+ cs CV\.ct- . . :i!... •.:• ---- - _ :.---- -7 - , : (---) ----- . , / ---/ ' '-'--'---_ c- / iitlitiO 4 : : :...:,: r : : :' '. . . . ioilirispr?.., , - . ...-:•:•.- . ! .:.: ,...-. . .:...: ; •• •!.....-:.:..- - ; ..; .;:,::;::::,:::... ::•:4. ::-. . "I::: :: :1',: :.::7:::7 . -:•:,:-.... •,- "•:.: ."..:**".:' ' --...•:; ...:-.',..:.:• ' •:.:,-.• .........::::',..,-: i■ i Iii l l.iii 1i i1 ii: ii1 i•:;::1::4 : , :■::::ii:1 :4 2 E i . ‘ g ljoh 4 4 1, 44t 4 . 0 . 66 . 40 . 1 .4....4: 4 ....+Ase..............ve).tc4ftr*efetoite;:q. ro 4.11.4. — .-....- .....--:f • 1 -. !cf c BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Special Session Shakopee, Minnesota June 19, 1980 Chrmn. Schmitt called the meeting to order at 7:35 PM with Comm. Perusich, Rockne, Koehnen, Vierling and Stoltzman present. Absent: Comm. Coller. Also present: Tim Keane, City Planner and Cncl. Colligan. Perusich /Koehnen moved to approve the minutes of March 27th and April 10th, as kept. Motion carried unanimously. Public Hearing: Variance Resolution No. 254 (PC 80 -21V) - Hentges: Perusich /Vierline moved to open the public hearing on the request for a five foot variance from the side yard setback requirements in order to construct a 22' x 30' attached garage, in a R -2 zone. Motion • carried unanimously. City Planner presented the case considerations, as follows: 1) The property is zoned R -2, Urban Residential. The lot is approximately 120' x 252' (29,736 sq. ft.). 2) The existing house has a 22' x 22' double garage. The site of the proposed addition is presently vacant (east side). 3) The existing house is slightly canted on the lot and 27' from the east property line at its nearest point. The 22' wide garage would encroach 5' on the required 10' setback area necessitating this 5' variance request. At the front, the garage would be 7' from the east property line. 4) The neighbor's house to the east is 12 -14 feet from the property line. City Planner then stated the criteria for granting a variance as stated in Section 11.04, Subd. 5A, as follows: 1) Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property which do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity, and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of property since enactment of this Chapter have had no control. 2) The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Chapter would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Chapter. 3) That the special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. 4) That granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. Proceedings of the June 19, 1980 Board of Adjustment & Appeals Page -2- gm • 5) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. 6) The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Chapter, or to property in the same zone. City Planner noted specifically the lack of findings in Items 1, 2, and 4, as required for granting a variance. Chrmn. Schmitt asked for comments from Steven Hentges, applicant, as to the purpose of the construction of the garage. Mr. Hentges stated that he would use the additional garage for storage of his tow truck and boat. He is now storing his boat at another location and would like to bring it home because of the vandalism problem he has been having. Chrmn. Schmitt has stated that he personally has had a problem with granting the variance as it stands now. It is an awfully large structure to add on to an existing structure. Chrmn. Schmitt asked for comments from the audience. • Steve Strehlow, 3259 Hauer,Trail and his wife, Maureen, stated that they are against the granting of the variance and stated their concerns of lowering their house value and the noise element of the towing truck since their bedrooms would face the garage. They further indicated they could see no problem in having a truck sit outside. Chrmn. Schmitt asked if it would be possible to expand the garage to three - stall. Comm. Perusich stated that the original plan was to come straight off the existing house from the right side, looking at the house, but there are so many roofs coming together that you would have a real mess, causing 14 million drainage problems. That would be a worse option. Chrmn. Schmitt does feel quite uncomfortable by adding this size of a garage to the existing garage. It just is too large. The Chrmn. also stated that if Mr. Hentges comes within the land lot, legally, he has the right to build his garage. Comm. Koehnen asked about this being a home occupation. City Planner stated that it is unlike doctor being on call, it is for his personal convenience not for business purposes. Discussion followed concerning the legality of storing the tow trucks in a residential area. City Planner stated that the Code only prohibits semi - trailer trucks in residential areas. Comm Perusich stated that this type of truck is parked all over town. Mr. Hentges asked if everyone could agree to make it smaller? Say 20' x 30' or 17' x 30'? Discussion was held and that was questionable because of the setback and variance. ;;, • .."Proceedings of the June 19, 1980 Board of Adjustment & Appeals Page -3- Koehnen /Perusich moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Chrmn. Schmitt asked, "What is the pleasure of this body ?" Koehnen moved for denial of Variance Resolution No. 254. Motion died for lack of second. Stoltzman /Vierling offered Variance Resolution No. 254, a five foot variance from the side yard setback requirements, and moved for its adoption. Stoltzman /Vierling moved to amend the variance resolution so that it is a 10' setback on the front, square to the existing building, or in other words a 2' side yard setback variance in rear. This would be a 22' from the existing house next door. Motion carried with Comm. Perusich abstaining and Comm. Koehnen voting "no ". Stoltzman /Vierling moved to grant approval of Variance Resolution No. 254, as amended; 2' variance be granted for the rear side yard setback line and a 0' variance to the front side yard setback line. Motion carried with Comm. Koehnen voting "no" and Comm. Perusich abstaining. Chrmn. Schmitt did make it quite clear to the =applicant and audience that this could be appealed to the City Council but would have to be made within a 10 day period. Also pointed out that if Mr. Hentges does file for a Building Permit that it would be a gamble. He should wait the 10 days. Perusich /Koehnen moved to adjourn. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:05 PM. John Schmitt Chairman • i (;) MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Public Hearing for Revenue Sharing DATE: July 10, 1980 In order to comply with Revenue Sharing Regulations, it is necessary to hold a public hearing to receive public comments on how Revenue Sharing funds should be used for the coming year. The hearing is to be held before prep- aration of the budget. GV /dc � .,yc ,` CITY OF SHAKOPEE . S a1 ^_ N 1 29 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 / iQ) s y u I w S MEMO . TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Douglas S. Reede • SUBJECT: July 10, 1980 DATE: Seal Coating Bids The bids for seal coating will be opened on July 11th and the bid tabulations will be available at the City Council meeting on Tuesday. , f DSR /jsc • • • BID TABULATION SHEET PROJECT: PAVEMENT PRESERVATION & REHABILITATION JULY 11-, 1980 • FIRM BID BOND PROPOSAL ITEMS UNIT BID . BLACKTOP SERVICE COMPANY 5% 1) Furnish & install bituminous .Gal. $0.99 material 2) Furnish & install seal coat aggregate Ton $14.50 3) Install City owned seal coat aggregate Ton $8.80 ALLIED BLACKTOP • 5% 1) Furnish & install bituminous material Gal. $1.00 2) Furnish & install seal coat aggregate Ton $14.65 3) Install City owned seal coat aggregate Ton $8.95 • /0111) c" ( MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator RE: Establishment of Watershed District DATE: July 10, 1980 The Council has previously discussed the establishment of a watershed district to build and finance the improvements needed to carry storm water from the large watershed which includes parts of Louiskille and Jackson Townships and the City of Shakopee. The attached memo outlines the methods available to establish a watershed district. COUNCIL ACTION: • The Council should determine if they wish to proceed with the watershed establishment and which method they wish to pursue first. DSR /jsc • • MINNESOTA WATERSHED ACT Arf-a Watershed - an area of land which contributes runoff water to a common outlet. Policy - Conservation of natural resources of the state through land utilization, flood control and other needs for the protection of public health and welfare. *Role of Watershed District: The watershed district provides a local organization which coordinates all water matters in the watershed. In addition, local people are provided with legal and financial authority with which to act upon locally initiated projects aimed at solutions to their problems. The watershed district boundary follows the periphery of the natural watershed irrespective of the boundary of existing local political governments. Procedure for establishment: Need to file a nominating petition with the secretary of the MN Water Resources Board. Petition must be signed by one of thef.ollowing groups. 1) at least one -half of the counties in the proposed district; 2) by a county or counties having at least 50% of the area within the proposed district; 3) by a majority of cities, villages, or boroughs within the proposed district; 4) or a nominating petition also may be filed if signed by at least 50 resident freeholders within the corpor- ate limits of any city, village or borough on whose behalf the authorized official has signed the petition. Nominating Petition Includes: 1) Name of proposed district 2) Necessity, why would it be condusive to public health . and welfare, or accomplish any of the purposes of a - watershed district; 3) general statement of purpose of improvements, territory included in district and subdivision, if any. 4) Number of managers proposed • for district. Need 3 to 5 selected from a list of at least 10 nominees. Selected as representatives of the local unit of gov't. affected. None shall be a public officer of county., state or fed- eral government; 5) Map of proposed district; 6) A request for the establishment of the district as proposed. A copy of said nominating petition shall be served upon county auditor /s of counties affected by the proposed district. The com- missioner of natural resources, and the director of the division of waters, soils and minerals, and proof of service thereof shall be attached to the original petition to be filed with the secretary of the board. RESOLUTION NO. 1651 A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT ON AN IMPROVEMENT (Prairie Street) WHEREAS, it is proposed to make the following improvements: Prairie Street from 3rd Avenue to Fourth Avenue by sanitary sewer, watermain, curb, gutter and bituminous sufacing and to access.the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of .the.improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA; that the proposed improvements be referred to H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer, for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvements are feasible and as to whether they should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvements as recommended. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1980. City Attorney `, CITY t S SHA `• r -rEE . h2`/k /`C . • ;3.4 : y i a 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 - :A:.1 . -: , .4):* ,,y Ma se...,-„ox MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Douglas.S. Reeder, City Admr. SUBJECT: 7/10/80 DATE: Res. No. 1651, Prairie Street Feasibility Study The City Council has requested. this feasibility study in order to allow Clete Link to construct several duplexes. DSR /jsc • • • • • • 0 • )/(2 MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator RE: East Bluff Avenue DATE: July 10, 1980 The Council requested that the City staff report on the schedule for clearing up the area disturbed last year when utilities were installed along the extension of Bluff Avenue near CR 17. The staff has recommended to the Planning Commission that this be made a condition of preliminary plat approval. I believe that this will be the best vehicle to get this area cleaned up. DSR /jsc • • • .4 + �� %^� v ~~ -_ . ''. _'_-__-____' -_-----'_-__. r • t | �| | ` / rIr` ", n/t-r CHECK nc1Inr 07-x"-o "'' ! ��� � �������_�_'��_��_�������_�� � � � ��_� �_��� �_ �� � ��_����_��� �� ' �� '� �� 1 F ' r Cv5cx *n. ow' AMOUNT VENOM �rcy DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT U. /»v, x P.O. , o"c nF ' ' '! » | |` �`i� ' .1/7 •11 4i j ----- '--��»-Crn� - — -- —'--- � MAIN!". U -' -- rI���J3��-�i * ���� - --'-----'---- | . !'� 19.76 ^ `' • . _ ` ! _ _ _______ ______ ______.__________________ .^ ' I | =` ^| 1717.11 ox/^/"n o��2c.o0 x"sn/cAv nur, BANK ' ,mrcns«r 42-4611-411-ml 1, ``iC/4 7//� ---- nC.l5 [VAY�mAqK PAYING /17 T ------'----'-`` ' ' ^ / Il l v ono"/ 4,43c- '.:0 A"zprcAw VAT. »«mx INTEREST 46-4u1-111-"I ° ` 1,31014 .`/7;`/or.. 25, ^mr»rr^w NAT. BANK PAYING AGENT 16-4812-=11-" •• � "" I M\014 r//n"/«: - ---2;3s5:2. ---- n xw--ImrcnESr - nI:31.1=11---------- ' - � � � � � - -- - --- ' '. 1n env"/oo 25.00 ^rcn�cxx v^r axw/ PAYING xnryr 53-*812-v11-01 ` ! / ` ^ 1 "//� 6,S0.'20 AMERICAN VAT. BANK INTEREST 55-*611-311-?1 / • l"iC14 '`/;':'/� " ' ------ C��� � � k � - � �'���--- -- Pii���� 7 f-EKJ - - -- r 2�ll:= - ----- /l -'------ -'----- ' ' ' �s,�19.un • |`` ' - ° -------------- ---------- - ^`^'r"". ' /,' �) '. ` �nv�^ �//�rxn zon .on ^Sooczxrc) xm'"xLr PATCHING !Iris. .1-*c^z'^u7-*z 1 . . ___ � ` - -��U��� r ----�--------_--_________ � ' ! • • �-.." ` /"o`= •Jvo .3"-1.F ^o/Lc�oxo "oo�p. VEHICLE MAINT. u\ - - ---- -�v��o-�------'-- -------------- - ----------------------' � .,` � "` ' | I"187a onorxn 5.66 AUTO crwr1^� xopp / Euorp MAINT. 01-4230-521-62 = !. i )"i�2� ?//�i/v3 ' - ---- l � .� --- '' — ��7�I�=N�}A[��� � � T --- '��L� l ti. --------- 1"1,"6 'I 97.11 AUTO crwnxL Sopp:r vrv/cLc w»Iwr. H-*232-321-32 7 ) . 1E:1'1 0n�'/o? 103.';‘1 AUTO ccwnxL SUPPLY vcxTcLc o^Tmc 01-4232-111-41 ~ • 1910,4 0 - ------ I: �� ----- --'- ' --'° 1,298.31 ^ • ^, ` � ° / ' - ' -- . A4 '' �?i ^nr1/v -'--���i�-'----' ---'--- tg�9�i-ERPt��r-----'---1�=�J3U��91:| -'----�'------- ' vo xo • ^ " / ! ` 1.7. ". .4,1.7. ' - --------------------------- ---'---------------�--'--'----------------�--- --'--- - `...r,� ~ '| 52) • ! 1. �,/x`/o` 96,"n WALT mxcnp^w mAvcI Evpcwxc ��-mm'1o1-^� "' i � '17/'N/ ' - -sn ��' ' ViL� �L��lM�N - �x6 �L �v��W�� �L'�3����( ' -� - '- ----- [1 z�� �! n` , « ` _ _ _, I I. z��,`11.5.11) ^ ' ` . ,2.2 ' ' '' ' - ------' ----- -'------------------' '---------�--------------------------'-----' ---� 4 • A =c"-' -- i„ | 191253 C7/C9/87 14.31 n`nrvx GENERAL soppL�cv n-*720'311-11 r~ • � | - . i� �i . ' ' - - - - - � - - -- - -----' | , ^ �� / �' _ _ _--__ --'- _ __-__- -- -^�^���.-_'° I . ' - -- � -_-' -'_ _ -_�-..-- __ --. _ _ * i 1poA, :I.".1/8'1 os,r, oz/^u ^sGx:nocs en^p Mill. `�-1e4o+zr-^ ° �v z.p, ^ |'. n: "" --- ' — • �� ' � -- — --' -- —' ----------- !'.,; /~m�� ^'' �v ^", xoc� 'v,nuc'c r ^r'- . ''-^,^ �-,o/-�� ke ' |" � �`c^� r/��/:- x' �^ ""'^w z"c� rn�nocr� 'svoxp x�wr ",�� ��-�` w-�:s-`/ ^, \ ` . ' ', , ^ /"o n • ' = �� ' ~ /`u7.r ':114/1 7"2'r rv^,L /'!_1.4:/.4 rF...n'=At. ■n,/. !;.-.` '1-^``.:1'`/L-`1 '^i' [� _ _~ ,.~ ^ - - _. . _ -_-- '. _ .__ _ __- -_' ••\ � ./ i • |. � 1"8 cIn 9• omxn"sc CHECK REGISTER c/-�`-^' -^`- '' 1 LI ` OAT': , CHECK y`. nx' ^`ooyr vcvn~n ' ITEM ocscprprr«N xccnvnr ,^. ruv, v P.O. !: :'��^�c z ' " ^ 1'1 � ' . -�- -- -_-____-_'_--__.'_ ___-_.'_----_--_'--'__-__-_-_-_---_-_-_--__-'-_' . | i ^^^^`• '^^''"� � ' .. ` | 1�1o�" ' '27/,`: - ' -------- sn:�» - --- ' -- - rprMoo - r� - nnnnmEcL ------ TnxvsccxnrwxE ------- �r=xzzo=3 1���r 1 -------- ---- � oo`on • ^ ' • _-� --_ _---_-__________ --_- �� � l ---------- ---------------- � '^ i !" ' ' 1n�"/ ,r/�'/o, "^v,'l cur plc. :cwcxAL n/prLi "�-�zco-/o-"� "rro� , `` | - `` '' /s o i�/ :,'lx - -- /n/ ------ -- 4ns7 NL: --- ----- � n�� - 2 . 1=4 - 3 T1'3=1 -- c s-----'-' ----- -~.: | 1. 375.2s • in ' !'H :a |'' ,311110.1A -�' ---------- -----------'--- -------' '----'--�----------------- ' �= . /`1:; cvnr»n 1.22 Cl x,y pxIwr/mu scncy^L svpp/rcS 11-4ze0-1^1-1^ . I`|z ' r/c 1 /n� - ------- ' -- nz�9« - ------ rcxr3 - pnznTIwn - ^ --- Emcnnc vr2o� r- Jzr=�----- --------' ; 1 1.v1n-9 17/0"/»r! 55.35 CLAYS PRINTING GE.NERAL SUPPLIES oz-4220-331-3.i z. ` ' /vc`� ;17/Cs/A') 7�,�u CLAYS no�w/zno � PRIG. x REPRO. ��-*n��-/��-�r ^' � i�i"/� �>/����� ----- --- �� - �� -------- �i��� �� ���2�� ---------- ������[ - �� ��[7�� ------- l��nJ�� {9l�� ----------------------- � �'l ' ^ 15-4220-1 91-1 1 ' | '; ,m,a • ',_ ) .,x . ^i~^• • —�-- •r•=:vr — ,. . � � ' 3. ) ' ^ / "no� �//on/uc zn.es cowsrnocr�ow no�. `� LEGAL NOTICES 22-4390-1 96-1" s^��� 35 Ii i"i�ai • �f/�s/�`' ----------- 2% : ��� ------ 't �� f 7�� e T TO� - n�[: -------- nxr�T - T - pr�nn ��1�i��q�rSaII�----- ° . . ' ^^ . — z�\r"" �`/-*xo o` �� c"mymocnow nut.. p v, � n 22-4351-1 ya �, sm�c ' - ' . . �. o np n. _ I': / • /s11 � � ^ 111.1L5T.--4350-311-91 //�/n� �*o. cnn�rxvcr,ow �. LEGAL NOTICES 5T.--4350-311-91 �z�o-/��-p� �^ .~ .'| 1p/o`, �/ /nr/no ------------ U6z=rv ------ �rnnsrnocrI�m - oo�� Pnr�7-u-n�pnn:------'_-57=�s9z=ro="1-5^1"`r----- ------'--.. . '! �s�ov'' c,/o° t�o.r^- r»ws/xocnow no�. pnrG. x 11 56-4351-311-91 5 Si ^" |'�. 183.7'7 ^ � ' . ' � .. .` / ^ ~^.-,x-. .` ; . �~ . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 o. cmEnuc S 7.7� v � �� / - ------------ --------- ' . uo.nn.^ 50 � • � . ". ! L/ /`��� �i/o��»h ` ___ --- l.46��I? —'-- _ - 3ULIUSA. cUi[�R1r -- � - _L�G A[ cr5 ----'-�;-43|V-i�l-l --'— 1,44.9.17 • • i" | - - •__ __ _ `_� _ _ ____________________________________ ______�___________________________________.__�;.��� � 53 :91.1P", o//m/x� no-^y o� rcx yIrc* cooTp,nmwr. '11 -4230-'121-4 �oov 'd • � 30 . _ �__'—_-�. / �--- - - ---_- -_- ''_--- _ -.. -__--__-__- i�� ' � � ^^-'v � � " � ^ - _ -- 0-. /`//n 07/2 22.v1 oowwInon xnuc• GENERAL n/"pLss t11-4229-121-17 15 '| xuioo nr/ovro c.(.3 ouxw/wT:x 104c. GENERAL mppLIcn 7.1-4220-1M-1f! ° �. ;ip � // ``/«� ' 1,05 now�rv:s ,nor. rEwcmL SvPrL/E� 41 ' -- --�-- / 1.`11`E. :. xn7 1.',1 ov~*/°:r vvui._. Gc"r"^l_ Ivr p' `�n 11-4220-321-12 :0 � . 11'117,1 , .17/1-!/'!"2 1^.=? rvn*rn'; �ooc, 1rwcxu SUPPLIES 71-4221 - 151�z 0 /CS/5 o '� nvx°��"� nu� ccvrna `o"n���s `� ^/�n �u �� — ' [] ' , - - - • • | / ��/`, c'/�ve o�. " '. .. rw� � � � x�. �`w �x�� �o,n.rx ��-^rr����'� �] • ` /`nr �//�»,� �..� ur`pr°e '/���. �r� �`/,`'�r`: '�'`,r�'�z/'�" • ___ �� � '/'''`/`� 11' `` c';x| i`/�. r. /� "v",'.. .. - • ^ �_� _ ' _ � ��� � � ���� _ � � ���������������_��� '� � ��_������_ i 1 `x� n n ~' s"^``"c� cp�cr ns�rnry C7-r '-r �^�r ` | ������. � '� �� _�� _.��_�� � . . ' , 1 ' Ii uprx n� !PIT ^woom` v�woo� �/cx urocnzponn ACCOUNT vn ENV 11 p r " o'r^�! ' !] . ` ` ^ ` ' ! i i= 1/+' 17/::,i/"1 1»�" n� uhY�cb'�o�' - BLDG. �Xl��- -'- -' ii�ii�*/z '` -- -- ' ^ . . . . . ' - - |` . �sn.�u , ' I. !' '-'---� --�---�- --------�- ---------- ----��--------�---'---' - - .......r-R,. - �. |.i ." | l':' +2 C7/,;"1/PG ` zm.os rzpcns:c� A. no,Lc oc*rcLr "xrwr, v/-^zoz'�o-`� " � ' - --��J��� . - ---' ' ''--- -'----------'---------- --- - -- '~ " ^ .� "' • --� `' . ---------------'------- ----------------- � ' /`1o^ ' 1: 1.R. EARL r.on:xoEw MOTOR FUELS 01-4222-S21-9' c1p`s `" ` m.�� ^ '` ! � -------------'--� -- -----'--' '--- ---- - ----------------'-- ---- -- - --'_--------- ■ ^^^'c"' r ., /.1 1^ .)v: ''vn - - -- ' -- s.Jr" - ------ !^oTnmrn : 11r ,-------- ' -- ;cmrnxL - SonpcF.o ------ z1 •7 74em=3o'-:/1 --- ---- ---- ' - � 9. 59 ^ . ' i - ---------- ----------- --------- --'--'-----'-- -- - -------------' �����v�- - � ' . . |~ � ~ n�vx� 1.3 rcrn-x/rr CONTROLS cno/p,nxzv�. ��-�zm-*zz-�� z^rC1 - • - --- 1�^ cs � ----------------- -------- --- -------'---'-- - -`^1 • ' :IA ' !' ! ' ^^ ^^ ^-rrc "` � ' _ -__-__-__' _ �_--__--_-____--'--_____' -_____�'___-_'___--'_-___----_ '__-'_--'_ -__ '-_____� . � _ _ _ /a/r rnr xo - 3 23,760. :9 RTRST m^T. Sr. pxl1_ INTEREST 92-051+411-'31 /� /n// � /- / "^ ` ' �� ,� `o.^� r'nur nm, ur, PAUL opopw/�c xoc�r sz-^ozz-�n-'� �` ' e��Ty»cvo ------------------------ ------�'-'----- . !; ' . ~ |' ` . ' ^^^-''s ° . l -- ------'------- --�----'----�----�----'--�------'-'--'--------'�-------' ��. � / �v�''v 191n3. nr r�cx�� 1 '1pF r""L �oorp,m'1-42.'1-42.70-411-01 r, - �-��o-�-v� s*,, .1:1 . 1,103. 7 .1. • ' . - -. ___ _—__ _'-------_---____'______-___'� ---_-___-___---_-__-�-___--___________-__--- -- _-_^, | ' �1'11173 , pm 42.01 \>�� , /u/ 01-4330-111-31 rLccK TRAVEL EXPENSE o�-�zzn-�-o� 5 ".' I 1 4 "4 • "' • ` '' - . - - .. . ' . . .. - - .- -.__ -- � --_--- - 57 �� ,° �� ^� 1. x'?1.1. '1 1'/o1/^? '- - - -- - ?s.:!? -- ' --- - n'x - n o^ozrxnnw ---- - ':^nnA"c'p/o------'-----01-:.-4»rs:4o1z1"---------- - --- | • /n1� « 1 �, /?.1/ on 25.0? r v It nxwrrxrIvw GARBAGE pro - . 1 1.--43 /3-311-51 | /nzm� cr/nv/x� us`»o n x ° SANITATION oxon«cc o�-^�r»-�u�-�r po ! ��i/n � � //x-/� � � �, � ' �� - - � - 6 -� � AhiTv/IVh - ' ' �o ��»,L'orO -• �1�4}73;q�l�6 ? ---------� -'-- ' 1911 0 zz.s? s x x cowTr^rznw c^px^Gr n/o • 1-1373'',11-;!. 1 Jvvv` 2' n x x r r p/ �� m/� . 0 ^m " �oy :xmw;s o - '*u1-,:! , � tllni r'/a«roo - ' • - 245. r'- - s P, 11 o^MnrTny - -- - ;;xxa^1c ",o — --11=4373+sex-:r;2 -- - - - ---= 07/0 /o z | 1111'11 o,� .�� c u 0 sxw�r^r��w �^no^�c P/U ' -4373-/11--1 ° « 46 !..44 tn i'� � - - ' .'^�� �^ - __ _ __ __ �`� - _ �� -_-�__-_�� ^^ ~^^''' . / |. i 1 `1* 17/ T 1`' G^rxrn sn r^oc< v�*rcLc v ^In i'1 i'1 r' / »/'r - ' ' 1 s1.33 t:' / 3`/1' "''. n"Pi1:11 S11 Tr /° xr"/ur xx It! '' - :1 - 42 `?-+21-u '",1/*,` t.., . 10.' . - -.~= " . • • .. • ... - .'_-_ ..... ' ___________ _---__-_- 1; \ ' ' z°Jxi rrr` «" Sxv.< cxrcx x'�Isr or-r�-`' AGE ^ • ____________ ��_��_��� ___________________�________________'_ ____________ .` ': cxrcx ',, 04T" ^noowr vsxnoi I rcx DESCRIPTION ^ccuowr wn /my. w p.n. , ° -cr^sc " ' • ` / ' /9ip� ni/�� ----- � � ------- � -------- • ---- ���7p� ' �'' zo,m • � , • �� |, . . . _ _____ ___ • • •_r - * . , ] ' 1o11o: n//xn/oa ;1. ?.^ sswcvvL CEP ICE, PROD. orc. SUPPLIES 01-4210-121-1' '' ! i i��� i� :(/� � -- ------- RA[_r�F ICE PROD. � � ���[� T -- '2 / 1p114 ^ 07/ 13.71 ncwrn^I crrrcc PROD. DEC. xonpL [c, 01-4210-171-1' ''' ` 1`11 :nn"?/xz .1n • /� ccwcn^� n�r�c� PROD. � x opp��cs '1-4210-311--'1 1 ' . . |`,. ��■ 19118 cnyn;o -- ' ---- � ------ p�ro ------- �EnEnxc - oErzr[ - rnz�� ---- �rc� - oopperc --- 1 11 ?Jul ;‘//^"/o� os so GENERAL G' F pnnc ocv�n�� supp��cn 11-4220-171-11 `" ! ' ^ ` ." ' |�' -___-_ 20 !.. ' • ^•^^^^ ^^^'c` • .• 1 ��7 37/3771 '1 -- ---------11.17o5'-------nv � Mir 'snozrTnxTm � zvr3ozr �r u � 2 -----'-- - - ---�', '' 1z1`25 • 26 ) |- 27 . . ' -'---_----- _-_--_' ~ �_' ^^,^^, �� ���������__�__ ....rK=---~ ' ' ' • i• ' • ' 1 .1.:'11 3n'v�n �,^c �cw wcv: ��c��, tint' FUELS P. �oo `z- 11 / ` � ` ■•• 1s211 - 17/1`7R0 ow ENS Eccr p.nn 1=4230=1 21=n2 ------------- --,' ( 1'41211 nnx')/xn ^.00 HENNFNS SKELLY � cnuIp.xozxr. 31-4237-S21-G, ~ ' ['| 20.40• ____._ ___� _ 33 r 13: ' ^^^^` ^^ •-•� , In • ~ 1'11215 -- '� ��z�� v7/1^/,1 ------------ - xzm snvc rn=zJz= -- -' n�-surz-----' ----- _ . L 511.25 ^ ^' I '': � 43 ' � - - -- il '— ----------------------- --- . —'---�---'---------'-------------'—'-------- 4. 6-17r.:., ' • 1"1")./2 o7/r1 175.:20. 11111 CORP. � |�1z3r c//:v/oo - --- CAPITAL-=DFC7X-OUTP: -----117-4512.---1114 ' --'--- ' �--' AV ^'-^^`^~ |? � - |^/ ^~ � - '- -- -- — - ... . ��. 1 " ze`^ �ol z,^n.m rc^^ rc000m 1. c ! . ' - � ----- ^ ~^ `~ ''^~' ^~^~' ---�—'--'-----' 5 . 1v1235 ,- .xc"/oa mo.oV r:s LIFE 1 NS. ' xcwIr-IDS " :1 ' � --� i00.�, '�' - -� --�- --- - -'----'- ------ ---- -' -� �- � '�'' -----'---- | � ~ / ^^ ^'r1(_ _ _ _ _____ '____� _ __ _ ______ _ __' __'_________ ________ 115 � /n1 9xx`/oo �,^�s x`�**Exx 3roNnAon vcx/cm a^�� n�-^zm-�u-11 ° .! n.�s~ •17 | I . ' ' - . ' -- ' '^ — • - H . ^ ^ . ^^^ 71 � ' • 1'41';!7n n/�`/«� 1,2')..`.17 K/1.3 F. n�v�n�x �cGAL scp,zCc� �/'^z�e-1:1-\■ — --'" , . /j �1 r//:v1� ��. "x^3: x ,xx^ LEGAL cr,v/cs� .IA-1uo-`1/-" �� . ` . 1 �`� ` . , • • — __—_— • ^. . . ^ ' | | 1°»7 '/r, "' xv^w.pE' CHECK REGISTER. n�-`e-r� -o`" s ' f-1 cx��� �`. »�rs ^xoorr VENOM ncoc��p��nn ACCOUNT NO. ruv. v p,n. ; o�s�^�r. ' ' '! ' -_ __-__�--_ --_� —�—'_'--.__'— _--__'_______� --- -__- _-_�- _ __- _.--_ ___'___--__. i1 ' |�. 1°1.2 '5 1 .77/C''',:.5 12.`2 TIM xr^wc TRAVEL EXPENSE - I.-4.533-1 24-12 1 " ' ` 12."'2 • / - - - ' ---'---�--'-------- -----------' -------- ------------- —� -'^ i | ' ' | ^^^^^~ ^^^'c ".' ' to '` Inip '`/�x'`� - - - --- ���� 7 --- ' - 7ATsROz rp� I N r - SUPsLY --- FUUIP•MA TN�• ` ' -----'----------- / � . . �� /I.^ • ° ` `` • .^^^^ ^ rA .Lc°� . . In ` /.': ��o," o 7.59 LONE STAR LIFE - � '--'---- • -�----' `---`'-�-'--------�-,--'` REMIT-CANCER - � ��- - ! � ' ^.^^^ ^^^' ~� - '-'--'--'---'--- ----------- ----�---'----- - |, 1913 I Cn.:O/o2 322.'s LOCAL owow o323 REMIT-UNION DUES 111-4924-311- .'1 2.f. ` /,/ 322 .29 ° . 27 | � ----�----�-'------------ -------'-------- ------ -'-------'----- ---------'-'-------'-- ° � - ' . � .^^-,"r |,'" ` /'u�1, :n,vx� m1. �3'' -- ' -- oxrooccw - , o n�»� - - ' --- -- cnuzp�nxzur� - wrno�Yo��vx'ss«o — - - �- � / 101.C2 • ' '- 3J . � � 19'131° �//c+/�� - ' --- l�� s? -- - -- ��i�� ����'�»�D�5 �C[� :-:3[l= 1 r------------'--'------,, /'?111x ,...r/:';':/"v 53.cx xxLnrxcow MOTORS VEHICLE omwr• :1-1232-1 21-12 ) I.~n/x o`/cV rnv•po x^�nrnunm MOTORS MACHINERY RENTAL 11-*3n2-311-XI l000l - -------crn� �s• - _ ----'--' --�------- ' |�| � .y / .^ ^^^ ^^ ^ ' ' � ^^^- 4:1 i { ' -� -' -- ----- - -----------------' ------'--------- 1 `13,r :r/cv"? 29.1 MARSHALL I, SWIFT nocu & nuoxcc. 1/-43"1'1 4 1-I^ ' z • | - -----------''------------�--------- ------ ------------- — --- ' ! l ' ~^ ^- r,o "o / ,` . i 1`Io^ 77 i1a ^� - .@UVL»xn Y1^ U0�r�� xcW�K �V�vL � o7ss^' --- ---� [| ,_ _ _��� '' z1r ^ ■ . . [� ^ ^ . _ __________ ______________..____. ________________________________ �-'--_----'. — - - �` ��rxx---�7 i ~ |'| 11137:2 1 135.1r, oiwn.n'wc ASSN. n�o�r-cxwcc» Ill-4926-111-' = �'i • 1.55.1r, • �---- --- --- --'---------- -----------___-_- .^ � � ' . --- ----' ---_ -'___-_--- -' -�_ ' _ _ . - -- _'__--__�_' ' __-_ -'_-__-_-__'_--''-__ ` �nn ^//�"/«o s� /s 'uxw •vo���, c�rc r�ccrx�c�r' o/-m�o-�o+�` � , , , 57 i`| 36 • _ " ' . '^^'-n' ' ^ FI ! I `1n1, v '/" 1 / ` ' ,I'', w.v^Lc u ' ' x ' r�cr rwo^� xopp�/, )1-121O-2:5-;7 � u-�. ' - --- ^�' ' ' `` * ]� ' K � ! `/3: ' '/`''�� �"'`r '/ ,^r`'�, ` ''u� .'`�� ''-* •° . ~«^ . . • ^ • • ' - - ... ........ --------'------------ -------' '1 ' •1`x7 cT`, or Sx^x N3,..: o/crx n xr ; -_ - ' coec, �`' oxrz omnuwr v�*ooe /rcx ncuro�pr ^ccoom/ vx. �n/. v �. ` /1 iri 0 -://C//o.) ----- 1. 4 30 M��� ���� C1-4371-1 i —'� n�-" � ! /1' 2//v`/,o 1. s , n.-4.371-..; u� ~.-� o��*c�xscu NAIL -/ |, !'. |rznr zn�'/"c *z,^1 piwNco^ycp w^rL.G^n :1-mrz'3u1-.z | \mas o//u1/qO ------3n�na--------nznwcrn3cn-----------_'-mxrc71xc---------------_�1�137/=42z" xc- - -'- -'-- - / ." 1.0 �"z`xr an�" oo zn.xn y�:wmxsco wxr�.�xx oz-*�r�-�z�-�� ,, |'! 1 2 _ __ oz,zn xIwncsosc" ~xrL,nxn "1-1371-422-42 ., Ii 19T�52. -------------------�---'--'-------------'--------------'---------'--'----'------------'-'-' |'" r � ^'^-,�� /`- � ' ` �� / 13^ 07/: 153.77 Moron PARTS op°r«nt povcL 01-4225-**1-41 `" ' • • Isno 07/9 )/112 16.49 MOTOR PART cooIp.o^ VII . 2z-^mv'*o-^, ° |-| i Cnu'/i1 � �[���MAl�r. ---- -42.5F-S22-G'• / n1»^ 4 07/0 27.11 MOTOR PARI S VEHICLE MA INT. 21-9232-321-; 2 1"/n6 27/r1. T n PARTS v /�1o^a :nr^/x` PUT vcn cc r� -- �n - nJ ----------- -- - / ' i • ' ^'" ^` ^~ " ^^ • 1 n / 3 ^ ^ e / ^z ^o MOTOR PARTS VEHICLE MA �/ -4232-121-!. z | ' ' � - ' _ 1.'! z= o /"o 5.7:1 ,"/ PART VELITCLE MA TNT 011-4232-4 21 z !-! ?"16.14 ^ 17 ~ ' /' . ��_ -_-_-_--_ _----_^ .- '| 1on�x Z7/0 4 /1 1 60.10 opLo.xr«x n m�aoxc pxm. o n'poO, oz-^zs1'10-,z 1-1 * n . no • ` - '� ' ' _------- ` _--- --_-�--_--_-__-_-__- /~ o 1v "n�/'xn A50-.5 RORER VI :ES wc^ ��srcx OTHER PR 71-4315-3 61-3 ' ' 650,01 * �] ` ^. // | /son' C1/1 656.00 ox. xocLL 1 !. ^ SONS ROAD x/Ls . ux-4x4o-^o-"z ^" ' !] 1p1rs" or/�`/«o n^*,vo ux, nuc� x SONS � nPATCHING rLo, 11-4241-4 27-*2 43 - -- -'- '----- --- -----�----------'— ���� -----------'------------'--'---'' ' ---'----- A.1 / ] � l,GC2�11 I ^. ` 4^4-,".1 ," I t - -- ----------------- ------- '------'---------------' ���)or .37/1'4/:31 15.72 N14 oc�� rc;cppnwE 11-1snz'1z1-11 v.. ' ' 191317 17/C1/10 /ap.zx ex pcLL � ' rc/Epxowc 01-4321-1 21-12 "' U - i9j`i - � /o�/�� --- ----- '- -' | ! _ .� _ 1913 ,:7/ )/11 6e.21 m14 "ELL rEvE J1-ee1-1s/-1: - ' '' 1"1o,' ona/x, ,.n/ NW 1 rc,cpxoxc 1z-+zuz-'n-1/ 1 913q - ' 'n`//El/ctn -- ' --- ' ------ y07«z ----- wn -- T: - ; 7- pHn nF ----- ' -------- '711.=4321=1 92=1 €, 1 p1317 07/21 /11 24.35 nu uc,I_ rc;cppnIMc 11-^az1-»z1-::1 . = /�1z"r 27/0'1/81 13.2c: NW 0 E L r�,cpevnc n1-13z1-ocz-`c =° |l - • �ip/ �1/? /i�� -- '--- 23.G1 - �--- M�»��i ---�--- 2, ---- �i-^3d-331-5° ! ------' �, �| �p�n/ cnc`/x� r A. ao� rc;cp�"wr `�-^oz�'�x�-�` 19131 27/2 //VI 62,11 m`: "cLL r"1cpvxwE. ,1-1321-41+^1, p11^r 1 61;*1 wy ncLL __ Tc; :1.4321L421-62 ' ---- '--- 1 915 1 14,19 vu nr/.L rs;rpv 71-4321-'..11-".1 III . 5«7 '17/ 2 �s. NW :cc� Tr; c"'wnc 15-1321-1 ` '- 1o3^, 771 4-^` *•/ rcii 711r," y-43:1-\Os-1` ' -^ ' -- ! ` �rp,�: ^ . � i I no :vP/x11 14; 116.141 x• NAT. ^ `•rmF Sr m-^411-au-11 ' .'`| 'vu �`/0v:' 12'52 m` M M. w"L�. pA,/w� ^;2MT 21-4612-111-91 74 ` 1`I`,^ C7/0 1/..V. 21.11 3.-5 x, ''"/' N'1.. e1 ::x' sr „11-1u1-'11'71 � � __j.� 1 '1 c".1 ://;'/` `r.'` `' ".':. ,",...,. `^,/':' ^``''/ •'-'.12-'ti-`1 . • • . ' - __-___'--__'-_-_- _'_-__'-'-'_-__-_____-_. | I | z`o CITY ^r �a^xn"�F CHECK nE�/srr^ nr -r`-x` " ^ :, ' • � _�-' _ '_---_ -_--___- -_- --_�_- '- _ . -- ' 1 cW ' ou/ v xFm"n I rco ncscvIpr/nN uccno"r M. `~v. n P.n. x ~,.."~^x.-. 6.1 1 ! ' '.."i ',' ` ://14) 265. :( N.4 Nn7� Mpi"... fNrF.P.'.-ST � - -- — - -7 44-4611-411-1 - - — ---- ----- -- 1 P. " '/o"/"I 12. . - r vv NAT. /V1._:".;. "^,rwo x"7vr 4 m2 - 11 - ^1 • 1n3 "-' 1// .:op": 3,2 N. n^ /, 'PLs. rxrcx 4"- 1' |` .` 1.i 1 �1 zxx c . ---1e.sV----�----x�-vvr��P Lo:--------- PAY /no-xcrwr------'---''nn=vo1o�7z*xr — - — - - . `| 37. * .^ -/ It | � . �- - ------- ' ------ -� ---------- '------------------------'--'-----' ---------- ;�� � ! --- '` ' ` � [� ! � 1 'I 7//71/q7 31.25 :'nn, mEncm �xnowoS xmnr.xr�r. "+^om-�:5-oz `� � -- ----- �1:2q-�- ---'----------'- --- � - -� ' ` = ! . - • I`w 'r/ .19.10 ",.Ans"w r ' nscc/cxhl:-7oos ,1-^ 49v-1 19.10 ^ , , �n^�� �`/c "o/.m rnxT-001,./1 CO. mnnc.run vcux/r 51-4940-711-(71 . oo1 �o i' --__ . - -__-__ | � ~ ^ ■ ^^^^ • ^^^ c K ' / � t ' _ �x� ^�� � //�v/S� --- — pnron 'nnnn-nrLS-------------n���zov��o7�vz - - - - l �a zs • ^ ' i ` ^ / /. ' '-__-_---__ _ ___'__-_-_ -_-_--_-- _-_ + 1. 1 '17/0"/1x w.onA.on prxn./»�o�o/wcs CAPITAL-OTHER / x"x. n�-^s�o-/�1-�� - "-- -- • n � � ^7��s�� o -* ------ ------'--------------'------- --------'--- - -' ' ----'-- ^ � t / i ' � ° - ' " ' • '� ..4.-c!“... � ..... _---_- . 1 .`1442 ".'/n/vr 30, oIrvcLs poLrm nrxcvpnm`.ucnvz7.c 11-*ns-1n-1r 31 .25 • �� �'������������������������������� ���' �_����_�������������_������ �� �' � �_�� ^ ^^^^^ " ^^'cv3 . I 3t � � 1'411'414'19 ^ v nz �^n /'a o~ - 224.95 k :DrTEi0 7 �� iU ���t x0. hA%qT . '-- `1-4231-\01-\ « 12:n � - - -------'-- | i' 224.55 • - - �� - - - -- -------. --------------- ----'--- -- - ---- -------- '---�� ` ;rr7 --�~ � �� | 50 [� 1914r ���^/ v//:�/^o e WELDING GENERAL ;31-422C-421-12 �a.ns o�nx 7n c� zopp���s ° ''| --- S2.�5 • ' ' ' '- ' - —�-- - ' - '�---- -' --' -- -----' ' -- --- '—'- - '----------- , ^°^^. .^^ .Y --- - _ � -_. . - - ' ' ' -'_-�- - _-� _--_- ' -___---_'k . = /Im c nP.:`/x: 135`50 1' TNT; FIRE cxrr. cuo/p.xxmr. 7 1 m-321-32 34 ,.., I ° 135'57 • '- ------- = . •..'r` / v |' /7m ;` �//:`/xo':":°.1"; ^s,"^ "-`�r� u1� �cm'�m :vpp���` `�-^�:o'��,-/` . Ag',^ • 17 .. ...7, . `I^ ,. ` / / s/' / - " : c'' .•'.'^ `I_ '4'11'''''... ' ` 'i - 4 z/ / -1 / 1 .-^ 1 I 7 ' `".1 , ' + , ! • . / r/: /' Sx,o"7.1-: o1r.c': x•713Ix`_n 7.7 '1 " | r - ' __ '_ _- _ _- ' I i, . . mrcv r ' nAr� o,"n'r vcpn'2 ` rcm nrxc"/pr`"n mc"o~r vn, '°v. v P.C. ^ «c v :`^' ' i � i .! - �y` 19 . - — - - —' - ---' ----------- ----- ---'---'-� - —' - -----' � :. .` • • • '- ' ^ '' , i. ' -�- -�- ---------------------------- ----------------------------�----- --'---- - • ~ 1n^r3 o,/o,/xn 85.12 JOHN nrc� TRAVEL EXPENSE 01-4330-3 21-3;"! to ` / / xs �x • ' II |`! - - -__--_� � ., 113 '` 11147'4 7`/' ` /" ...: 49.11 DOUGLAS S. REEOER wFcnwG c 7?1-431 5-121 ; -�- ^ ` • ^�`�� ^ i��| i ' -' - ---- ----' --- -'------------'---' �� ~.� ^ ~^°^ ^^^-c"p '" ` .! = • |- i `14 tt/c`189 --- ----- . 90 ------ R ESIAEA TI G . rill r F- 1nlTr z, i.' /v1^ ' r`�,=n nrro pr^nwu v'on, «�`nr. "�-^u�/-���-�` i22. ' ' > 1 1147 ;n?`/1~ ,rs nv- nrco xr^nw� x�oo. omwr, y�-^�n-�zz-�� | ---� — ' --- — - � ---- n7s��r • -- _ || • 2n , . . \ ■ �°. 7.7 . -_- - ^^^' 7n |- 7. � 1."1./1 7, ' xu/v1 m 3^67 DAVID nxou"nomxn'ow GENERAL SoppLIcs• '1-4220-3 21-'-2 ° ` ,` sn»`a, • " ^ ^^^-�xc � ` � = 1 r | | | 1 :7/�i/o� ------------- 3.25 ' ------- S& q � ---- GENERAL s �7��r�l�--------'-----------'= /?1m1 cn(.. x� � s c�.'� 5 x u OF �xoxnpcc coozp.m��wr. �'-�vso-���-1 F 1 • ��,ns • ~ . •- '-- - / .^^ ",s � • -_' !•. i71�` , - • • • -- ?3���� ----- ' - ��� 5 ��D�R - MF� -- � -------- � LWEnA[ - UnPLT�� --- ' ----° l�q%�O=�21=5 � LOx- --- --- -- ' 1v14 `i j n7n`o 77.2o ucenoFnrx MFG snrsr, SUPPLIES 11-4224-3 11-31 IFt3: / • 1 . ' '1^` 1 . 1 //.I"/o` 21.77 nrpxr.cncx rr: SAFETY :ovp� ,1-+uz^-^o1-^z 1F,3 I.,' / • . -'-- ------- ---------- ----� ------ -'-----------------�----'-- -----'--�-- |' = " ; ,. -| ` ^^^'rKS 111 153 . 1.,1 13 1P7 m,vr o"^x"ncE wnxc. rcwr»xL n/p"l• Tr. c c.1-4220 '411-*1 ' !' �"�`�� o//�*xx ' ux,`* mmxoper xnuc. ocmcnx� ��pp�s' r/-�scn-^e�-�r ^ • 1i1.533 - - 3Tn7 -- -� - sImnnrcc - n c on7 cm ��= � rr--- --- -------------- ' 5` 191s`3 07/09/03 ^.vo ypAnupEc snoc, GENERAL SUPPLIES o1-4eoo-;u1-ft: � = 1 915-3 rr/`"« c 'z z�`�z SP xuoc. GENERAL SoppL c1-^zzo-sez-9c = ' 1c 7/ �� `/? - - - -----��� �� ��0rs-1b���-- '— - � ` -� i�� ii/�-�l� --'-' -`[r��-�2 ��� z421� j - •-- - - - -'------- — ,! `"n'i '7/9 ?/•(`) ^^�� o'AxcpE, �nur. 9nnov�x nx1x/.oro. �/-^ 1 [ � 141, �a ^ � . - - - - ' ._- - - ' - '-- _ _ -_ ,, / ° ^'^-c`: i. . | � / ~ I. �`i�`9 : x2^/,� �`4r n^v"^=c _win ""w'n�/. Su,"LlEs 21-4220;j1 01-12 �� �`��'� �r''/'x- � 'I f!, p'^r" �u��cn ^�*-m' nup "/ T. `�-^�ps-�/�-a r , ' � - � �`'` • . ' - . `� | � •••^^° .^ .-r,i .. ! .1 � - 1.9191,4 // `'"` �`. v' nw`` •, -'».'' ' i'1``a / \-� ' ' — - � --� . ^ / • . . . ' '. . . , - - .... -' --'------ ' | / | . ' `''n' NT-. ^- o"^,x," cxcc" x�,��',n �`-'`-^' ,"r . | ' • | ' c* r'' "w- rs ”011"; T vrnn"1 rrsv nctcxrp`rn° ^ccoo"r v", ,rv. v p'". x ^'r^,' / |i 1. . � ' �"�/ �//�/' ��.�" s,rn'p nxvsz ��nrn sv.`PiT� �^-^y , • �z� `: ^ � . .• • • • . _ _ _ __. __. __ �� _ ___. __ _ i,^'(vt -: . ." • It ' ' 1n51; /n*1-?/3" 13^7"31.P^ x»m N o x/c) INC. nrvcx pnn�.scnvI:c no-a1 5-91z-n ,-;.• ^ l3,f�i.�4 • ' -� - -' -- - - __ _ ___ _______ _ _. .. ..... _ _____ ____ __ • ` r /v1`1 3ve "` ra `/ �z�."� spoc '�cc rrI , e /-^no-' 81 -1 - � ,,l 1=1917 1//9^/s ' ---3i,^?;- ---- - cLECr�zcrn - - ?[-vz7n*nx+ - ---- � 1,n1, ono`/", 240.35 s~oc ELECTRICITY 11-13 ` �' /sxo`/ �x��/m wo.`� npuc c�ccm�c�n o�-^zru'�z�-�» � ' i"�i , n�`/n� -�]�� ----'-'-- - -- ELECTRIC (YY ---------- � - � 1��3yV���/ - 4 2 ' ----------- ' ----- ' Ft 19/51 '.'/'.:"/�3 V11. - 1 o'ot cLcc/nIcr`r r/-13rn-ozz-':./ ;" 1. 5 151 r 3r/: `/": m.nx n"vc cI_c mrr/Tr "1-m /'1p1/ 0 m».4» spor -------- --'--- ELECTRICITY -------- --.: — - ' • 101y ./'-. `/x: 127`12 opvc rLcc/x/cIr, 71-4370-628-7;2 Lo ` . / �1"17 3//3^/�y 107.25 :"oc ELECTRIC In 71-4371-321-17 1 -1517 ^'/r*x^ �� • - �,Ur' • - ' - U���n'kr ���� --- ' ��n��^n�����1�,� - -'-----'— -- /� � � ' |= , / »o/ / � vp/«7 snx.cs upyc x» rsn cyvxmrc ' 1 -.111 ` Ao z,c6r,x1 ~ ..---....... ___-____ ,' ' i /9151.x 0//1 20.30 ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL nLo"oTcSrc ,1-1125 -311-■1 " ■ i ._- _--_-_ `^^•^• ^•^''"n ,~ . |. . . ~ •• 1 '7115o 07/7 • * • --- 3z:o0 -- ' -- orvnxs - CL7Aw/wo ------- ' nLnn:-Mv1mT - ---- ' . 1 7o:o on` �/.yy xmnxz cicxmryo o�os. ^xInr. :�-^zx1-zou-1» ^" ` |! A3 -` �s�scn ":.7/• ��^oo oroexn CLEANING p�os. x^zwr. "1-1231-311-31 '! ini�`� �nninl - '---15' ---- STaRkS - �[�/MING - - ' ---- ' �iJG. HA INT. --------�- T�q�31-n21-�2 --- ---'----------'-- x1.*3:.' ^ ' ^ , ' ------�' ---'- --�---- '---------------'---------------- ------ —'------'------ r^ .` |� ; ! 1. . ;v r-?/x2 11.1 q8").10 mmon"^n ' mn. cuGn. ccnxzcc 56-4312-111-'11 (117"57; ! 1 �n�x�� i.li5-� copondeN FNG, • cm*x. 0E�� V��' ��W 72:1`-'34 �1z��ii-/i 72:1`-'34 � . - ' ' �z^v��`�� • i �� /71s`; Ili/ cr/ x;3 - - ' --- ' - .S3:/n --- ' -- xu'L 'noxm[no - vrc: - ooppczEo - - ----- z ---r� �ruzo�2z� r � | ---------- -------- / - /pz5nx o//oz/xr 11.31 x11=1_ nusmcos cnorp, orc, SUPPLIES :1-vx\o-1o1-1^ = i ! 1 5?. ''7 0 7 ir7rx2 8,73 SUE!. BUSINESS cnorp, npc, soppc/c� cz-*z�o-1n1-1� ~ ''i /��sa �n:/i�. '''- - '- \��� - � -'- �i'^ 0 VhP i'�t�s� ���- 6 r : ( . .. xUpP[\�� ' • - • '- -�|� F «u\o-��'1 ---'--'' 1 915'6 '37/72~/n3 23^55 So71.. ooSncns 7 P. sEwTnAL roPpus :1-122C-1 51-1"-) r 1 51.~6 o s^w so"L roSn'so rooI", nFc, xop,L I 1.5- 91-1 �� |' - - 1uo z �-' -'--'_ _ _ � _ __�__ __ � .! I.1 ^^ ^'cx' ° [ ^ ^^ ^ ^^ _- ' . . � |�� / ,v WA': `,lr..c^^r '//' `c owte',', 0.1 � ", 1-2 1 ��� »-�' . 3•1';2.1r.- ^ . ' ' . ^' ^'c' , ' . !^'.`i` ...' " '`', `. � ' '-r ', •'`, .'* '---.^' 1-ii `.+' II'..' - '-= - -- - - - -- I 1'•'11" r:TTY . I1: .`-;IIA It'': CHECK RE"'STr'1 7 I -' -`t '•n-- -• :'I. J: ' OUNT V -IJnn2 i (, 1rrK I r.- u �'. ITEM f)ESCRiP ACCOUNT " f T !V. I! P,r q eqc A { i . � _ a • . -rI , 1. 1 hi 1115 /S 1:7/Z -1 /R? ?n5. iJ U OF M SCHOOLS Y CONr•. ,:1- 4318- 51.1 -51 w. • i" ?95.5C 1' . 1 °1 ° ,7 7 8 /:: /R' - SC.:: U....1. POSTMASTER PpSTASE 11- 4320 311-51 '," , 17 ••. •..• -.rvS ,n , ,o c L _ _ - - _- - _ - . _ F ___ _ �_ _ __.-___ . _- __- _-- ___.._._.- ..._.__ __.___ I ^ l � ' i. 7�= t /71 _ - -,,. 7 V r,j, l . . -Y COJ[PNcFJT �.. F. t1UT tiA .iF1T'.__ __._- __ 4230 =� - 2 1=42 6191 z, 55.;7 • I:- , 7/ il 3 - -- 137:7 '- - - V'AL•L_ CE WI. 'PP AN _ O TOR`FUE 1 .. 1c1 - 77 ^�71' - -- c - r I :S - - -- c -- _.... -yq= 42..2 =3 I 1= ' {.I_- _ - - - -• -. ...._.__ f 1' ? !'7 1 ' - •' S /;) /tii 14'1.55 VALLEY Iti). PROPA'1£ 'I • MTOe FUELS 51- 4222 - 42.1 -'12 74 , I'' 1 1`'173 ,-1/.-.1/n2 2 CC VALLEY MO. PROPANE VEHICLE F1A[NT. G1-4232-4 71-12 37 ;1; 77;lr ii n 71'5, 117 VA LLEY LN7. 1'I1li1'A1= S ACN.L JE_IFY RlT IL -- 711' /15 31T=; v .. 1clb '3 "7/7:i/!5 61.7 VAI ?NO. Ptt')PA'1r MACHINERY RF.NTA1: 91- 4382- 421 -1? i. 576.12 • - 1 71:704 ? 7 /?'I /:717 17. VALLEY SPORTS GENERAL SUPPLIES P1-4220-;11-',1 94 I 17.38 • as _.. _.__..... _.._. __.__c - �. _ _.-.- __- ____.- ___._.-- __.__- ___...__ 1 `' 1 14 - ' ?7 / ^ , ' l /T1 1vA: - _ "CREPT: VOXL - -- - - -- TRAVEL ERPENSE_ G1 =433t 151 -T:= I i 1°'16" 21/7 ^ / #15 158.43 GREGG VnXLAND SCHOOLS S CnNF. 11-43 °8 - 151 -1`.i 42 216.43 + "' 14 61 %7 -i 'i • - . -- ....--- • -• --- 2 e__ ___ - ___4 c 1'T °FSUIILl lNIDr, ---- ---- 13 - •_K .> r.:.;, .1=43`4 =121 =1 ^ - -•• --- ., 1_" 62.25 • 50 1 I , A ._. _.. - ?z i .. 1' ; / •Ir.4' ? 6 ^.54 , WAHL 3 WA'II. EOUTP.'AINT• 11-42 „• 30- SI1-3l 134 1.0 1 . ... _ .. _.. - ...__ ... .. _, ...._ .... .__._._, _..... .... .., -. n� ■••i 1 r1.6 C7/ ; lr'32 142.C X °ROX rr1R•'. 'Irc.FoulP.PNTL. ' 1.-43 1 13 - 3.11-1' 1 .r,3PJ 5 1 •' I 1 1P2• °: • ' I 1 •, ..., a • ._rye n7 1''lr.'i2 E.7 /:' WA9 5r1. 57 'CO r•t. Vr'HICI_'. .'• jti •.; T. , 1-4232-521 - 1 .,: <p 1 •' 54.57 • I;; - • .. _rK _. II i , -1 . 77/ •/4^ 1. u,: / • •_ /'.tAR' H '.Cl 7 . '\ '! 11 . ' 1 - ' 1 7 i2 ■ 11-.1. , ':F a G t[ . :71_ . 1t, ".. 7 • • . � . �_--__-_-�- ^ I | � 1"8" cr r` or m"x :"cc c*ccx nEc/orr.x rr-;"-n' ~1- /: | `/ _ .-__-'__ -_-�----_�_-_-__.--- ---_--_---_-_-__-- ' -_-__ - ._ .. - ' ' r.: hi ' - rx 1. nv T , ^InuNr xcwun r /rc" ncucxrprrnw ^ccno* I ,w , . .! nr�u�� v. p .'^ ' - ' •| '----'- �� - -- ---- ' - '- - --- — ' � - — �-- - ''----'------ , `' ! ` "/o',..i ' ^/L11 17.25 z tEoicn Pvr, sourp.nx1or. r"1-1230-121-42 'r.'1o`s 1//r r.5,.. cu TIC• cuu/p,wx,yr. ��-*x�n'*z�-�r I • � -�' -'--------'--- x ��� 5 -� '-----------------'------- �-'- ------------ ' ./ ' ' ."i . ' It ^^^-r«n ." '| --- 30,A91.3:1 -------- f71 TOTAL - —'---------'----------- -------------------------- z94.^o ON 15 TOTAL |'` ' 27,' romn 22 TOTAL. �" • ' ---- -n7�ose;sn--'------ro,o-xJ-rcrnc- --'---- ---- •' -'------------------ -- ------- 141.1.2q• 4 .1 = own 21 TOTAL to to 20,131.00 FUND 31 TOTAL '. 2 CO --�'---- FUND 42 TOTAL -- ----------'-----------------------'------'-------------'----- ' :77.90 FUND 44 /nruL /=~ ^`^ FUND ^o Trro, ` - 3.3o5:7;r ' TOTAL '--- --' ...... ------------------------'--- '-- --'- 3,152. �own �� TOTAL . 17,3 ' | : 23.792.40 "oon 52 TOTAL ! i - 51j80• �� ' --- ' -- ' FUND 53 Pn[4i --- '----------�------------------ ------'--------------\� 6,609,00 FUND 59 mum. . r ' mum. ' zn.y`z,`, royo 56 rnr^L - ------1-1zh�v�-�-------romn-sn-Torxc --------------�--------------------'----'- '--' — -|�1 z 1 FUND 71 TOTAL 565^21 rown 81 TOTAL = ---� ' -----� �������Y�L ---' —' ------------------ ------------'------------ � |� . ' |~ 108,3911. ^0 r"m� |- . ` ' -__'- -_-_'_-__----_____-_-____________-_'-_____'__-__' -_'_-_-__- ' -__ _ :. i`� . = AZ . / • •. . ' |, ! - '---''----------- ------------- .! |'| | ' - -'- - ' - --- - • -' --- ' . !, .1 izio [ I - ' ---.-_-_ ! I ' ! . . ' [ I:: : - _ - _ � - - - ' -- . . ' - -_� - - ---__�- ---�-___-_��� i ° no | ' 57 i`1 . - --------- . |i � '� 17: ' &p .. -_- DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR CK.AMT. CK.NO. 01.4222.421.42 01.1010 8,473.76 Motor Fuels Amoco 8,473.76 5592 01.4512.151.15 01.1010 222.82 Capital -Ofc. Equip. Business Furniture 1,820.02 5593 01.4512.121.12 01.1010 399.30 Capital -Ofc. Equip. Business Furniture 01.4512.331.33 01.1010 1,197.90 Capital -Ofc. Equip. Business Furniture :.=32:4611:911191 32.1010 2,500.00 Int. on Certificate 1st National Bank 2,500.00 5594 of Indebtedness of Shakopee 11.4210.811.81 11.1010 66.12 Office Supplies A.B. Dick Pro. Co. 66.12 5595 11.4220.811.81 11.1010 7.93 General Supplies Dunnings Hardware 7.93 5596 11.4230.811.81 11.1010 17.18 Equip. Maint. /Repair Kokesh Athletic Supply 17.18 5597 11.4330.811.81 11.1010 9.50 Travel Expense Mark-McQuillan 9.50 5598 11.4220.811.81 11.1010 20.95 General Supplies Moorlane, Inc. 20.95 5599 11.4321.811.81 11.1010 95.76 Telephone NW Bell Telephone 95.76 5600 11.4391.811.81 11.1010 70.00 Dues & Subscription Nat. Rec. & Park Assn. 70.00 5601 11.4231.811.81 11.1010 34.50 Bldg. Maint. /Repair Pearson Florists 34.50 5602 11.4220.811.81 11.1010 4.38 General Supplies Roberts Drug 4.38 5603 11.4222.811.81 11.1010 100.70 Motor Fuel /Lubricant City of Shakopee 100.70 5604 11.4230.811.81 11.1010 35.00 Equip. Maint. /Repair Suel Business Equip. 35.00 5605 11.4320.811.81 11.1010 30.00 Postage U.S. Postmaster 30.00 5606 01.4370.351.35 01.1010 55.33 Electricity MN Valley Elect. Co -op 55.33 5607 81.4923.911.91 81.1010 4,590.45 • Pera Withh. PERA 4,590.45 5608 o 01.4410.182.18 01.1010 22.50 Janitorial Serv Eunice Dedecker 27.00 5609 II II 11.4410.811.81 11.1010 4.50 If 22.4509.196.19 22.1010 1,524.00 Capital -Other Shakopee Pub.Utilities 1,524.00 5610 June `80 Page 5 z DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. ,AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR CK.AMT. CK. N0. 22.4315.196.19 22.1010 243.00 Other Prof. Services P. Wermerskirchen Abst. 243.00 5611_ 22 .4315.196.19 22.1010 789.69 Other Prof. Services Von Klug & Assoc. g 789.69 5612 ,15.4330.191.19 1 5.1010 230.00 Travel -R. Hullander Travel Designs 230.00 5613 0 1.4220.311.31 01.1010 19.11 General Supplies Montgomery Wards g Y 19.11 5614 8 1.4931.911.91 81.1010 570.00 Savings Ded. 1st Natl.-Shakopee P 570.00 5615 85.1090.000.00 85.1010 1,530,000.00 Purchase of CD. Midwest Federal 1,530,000.00 5616 (Void - replaced by Ck. 1f5623) 85.1090.000.00 85.1010 1,125,000.00 180 day Repurchase Merrill Lynch 1,125,000.00 5617 (Void- replaced by Ck. # #5622) 85.1090.000.00 85.1010 100,000.00 30 day CD. TIN Federal 100,000.00 5618 01.4231.181.18 01.1010 2,140.00 Roof Repairs Nelson's Roofing 2,140.00 5619 22.4519.196,19 22.1010 85,238.42 Pub. Imp. /4th & MN Erickson Con., Inc. 85,238.42 5620 01.4510.311.31 01.1010 21,123.00 Pur. 3 New Squad Cars Iten Chev. Co. 21,123.00 5621 85.1090.000.00 85.1010 1,125,000.00 180 day Repurchase 1st Natl.- Shakopee 1,125,000.00 5622 Merrill Lynch (Replaced Ck. #15617) 85.1090.000.00 85.1010 1,530,000.00 Purchase of Cd. 1st Natl.- Shakopee '1,530,000.00 5623 Midwest Federal (Replaced Ck. #5616) 01.4510.311.31 01.1010 9,525.00 License Deputy Registar 9,525.00 5624 (Void - replaced by Ck. #5625) 01.4510.311.31 01.1010 95.25 License Deputy Registar 95.25 5625 (Replaced Ck. ##5624) I 81.4921.911.91 81.1010 4,446.49 Y SIT Withholding Comm. of Revenue 4,446.49 5626 81.4920.911.91 81.1010 10,868.37 FIT Withholding 1st Natl.- Shakopee 10,868.37 5627 • • Juue ou - rage b DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. VENDOR AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS �E . DOR CK.ArtT. CK.N 0. ' 01.4315.121.12 01.1010 250.00 Other Prof.Service Nathan Wittenberg 250.00 5628 01.4392.311.31 01.1010 70.00 Licenses - Police Ofcrs. MN State Treasurer 70.00 5629 15.4391.191.19 15.1010 12.50 Dues NAHRO 12.50 5630 15.4390.191.19 15.1010 155.00 Schools & Conf. NAHRO 155.00 5631 5,565,258.41 5,565,258.41 • FUND TOTALS O1- General Fund $ 43,593.97 11 -Comm. Services 496.52 15 -HRA 397.50 22 -4th & NN 87,795.11 32 -Cert. of Indebtedness 2,500.00 81- Payroll Trust 20,475.31 85- Investment 5,410,000.00 5,565,258.41 • '1 ,,July,'80 -Page 1 DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR CK.AMT. CK.NO. 01.4390.121.12 01.1010 204.00 Schools & Conf. • Concord Hotel 204.00 5632 01.4100.411.41 01.1010 367.39 Severance Pay Nancy A. Engler 367.39 5633 81.4931.911.91 81.1010 570.00 Savings Ded. 1st Natl.- Shakopee 570.00 5634 81.4923.911.91 81.1010 4,763.24 PERA Ded. PERA 4,763.24 5635 01.4499.151.15 01.1010 506.48 Miscellaneous Dept.. of Treasury -IRS 506.48 5636 81.4920.911.91 81.1010 8,378.20 FIT Withholding 1st Natl.- Shakopee 8,378.20 5637 56.4519.911.91 56.1010 , 75.00 Other Improvements Chicago Northwestern 75.00 5638 15.4390.191.19 15.1010 500.00 Advance Expenses Richard Hullander 500.00 5639 01.4330.111.11 01.1010 112.00 Travel Expense Dean Colligan 238.13 5640 01.4390.111.11 01.1010 126.13± Confer. & Schools Dean Colligan 5640 01.4330.421.42 01.1010 60.48 Travel Expense Perry Cheever 60.48 5641 01.4425.311.31 01.1010 15.00 Bd. of Prisoners Carver Cty. Sheriff's Office 15.00 5642 01.4980.711.71 01•:'1010 3.63 Refund Anthony Doric 3.63 5643 01.4330.321.32 01.1010 14.00 Travel Expense Gerald Dircks 14.00 5644 01.4991.911.91 01.1010 872.00 Contingency Dustcoating,Inc. 872.00 5645 01.4220.311.31 01.1010 78.88 General Supplies John J. DuBois 78.88 5646 22.4519.196 ;19 22.1010 34,929.69 Other Improvements Erickson Constr.,Inc. 46,855.77- 5647 56.4517.911.91 56.1010 11,926.08 Watermain Constr. Erickson Constr.,Inc. 5647 01.4391.411.41 01.1010 26.00 Dues & Subscriptions Engineering News Record 26.00 5648 01.4390.111.11 01.1010 96.64 Conferences & Schools Walt Harbeck 96.64 5649 01.4232.321.32 01.1010 29.48 Vehicle Maint. & Rep. Hoffers, Inc. 29.48 5650 01.4980.711.71 01.1010 21.41 Refund Marie Hinkley 21.41 5651 01.4394.311.31 01.1010 22.03 Books & Pamphlets Inter, Assoc. of Chiefs 22.03 5652 July, ' tSU- ±age 2 DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR CK.AMT. CK.NO. 01.4330.111.11 01.1010 95.20 Travel Expense Dolores M. Lebens 109.35 5653 01.4390.111.11 01.1010 14.15 Confer. & Schools Dolores M. Lebens 5653 01.4330.111.11 01.1010 99.96 Travel Expense John Leroux 196.69 5654 01.4390.111.11 01.1010 96.73 Confer. &;Schools John Leroux 5654 01.4232.421.42 01.1010 204.00 Vehicle Maintt & Rep. Midland Equip. Co. 204.00 5655 01.4391.121.12 , 01.1010 11.05 Dues & Subscriptions Minn. Star 11.05 5656 01.4391.141.14 01.1010 15.00 Dues & Subscriptions MN Chapter Inter. Assoc. 15.00 5657 of Assessing Officers 01.4391.151.15 01.1010 60.00 Dues & Subscriptions MN Good Roads, Inc. 60.00 5658 01.4391.151.15 01.1010 10.00 Dues & Subscriptions MN MFOA 10.00 5659 01.4390.311.31 01.1010 120.00 Confer. & Schools MN Contin. Legal Educ. 120.00 5660 01.4231.311.31 01.1010 723.20 Bldg. Maint. & Rep. Marsh Heating & Air Cond. 723.20 5661 01.4391.121.12 01.1010 5.71 Dues & Subscriptions Nation's Cities 40.00 5662 01.4391.111 :11 01.1010 28.58 1 01.4391.161.16 01.1010 5.71 51.2300.000.00 51.1010 822.24 Developer's Deposit Daniel J. O'Connell 822.24 5663 01.4394.311.31 01.1010 29.12 Books & Pamphlets Prentice -Hall, Inc. 29.12 5664 13.4499.911.91 13.1010 750.00 Miscellaneous Parks & Rec. Grant Section 750.00 5665 01,4396.111.11 01.1010 19.63 Meeting Expense Eldon Reinke 19.63 5666 01.4320.321.32 01.1010 .66 Postage City of Shakopee 45.12 5667 01.4320.411.41 01.1010 7.96 Postage City of Shakopee 1 01.4320.655.65 01.1010 1.31 5667 Postage � City 6f Shakopee 5667 01.4320.121.12 01.1010 1.35 Postage City of Shakopee ! 01.4220.171.17 01.1010 12.21 Office Supplies City of Shakopee 5667 01.4396.171.17 01.1010 5.00 .Meeting Expense City of Shakopee 5667 E 01.4232.421.42 01.1010 p ee 5667 6.18 Vehicle Maint. & Rep. City of Shakopee 5667 01.4232.311.31 01.1010 10.50 Vehicle Maint. & Rep. City of Shakopee 5667 01.4315.321.32 01.10f10 191.50 Other Prof. Services Shakopee Med. Center 191.50 5668 01.4510.421.42 01.1010 35,215.00 Capital- Vehicles Superior Ford is o,s nn r ' a July,'80 -Page 3 DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR CK.AMT. CK.NO. 01.4243.625.62 01.1010 165.00 Grounds Maint. Mater. St. Regis Paper Co. 165.00 5670. 01g220.411.41 01.1010 166.99 General Supplies Teledyne Post 166.99 5671 01.4330.121.12 01.1010 16.68 Travel Expense Nathan 0. Wittenberg 16.68 5672 01.4232.311.31 01.1010 53.76 Vehicle Maint. & Rep. Valley Tire Service 53.76 5673 22.4514.196.19 22.1010 8,100.00 Road Construction Wangerin, Inc. 8,100.00 5674 71,4411.911.91 71.1010 30,260.42 Current Use Charge Metro Waste Control 33,205.67 5675 71.4412.911.91 71.1010 2,945.25 Reserve Capacity Ch. Metro Waste Control 5675 01.4394.121.12 01.1010 3.60 Books & Pamphlets Documents Section Dept. 3.60 5676 of Administration FUND TOTALS • 01 - General Fund $ 39,951.24 13• -- Park Reserve 750.00 15 - HRA 500.00 22•- 4th & Minnesota 43,029.69 51 - 1976 Improvement 822 :24 56 - 1979 Improvement 12,001.08 71 - Sewer Fund 33,205.67 81 - Payroll Trust 13,711.44 143,971.36 . /® MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator FROM: Gregg M. Voxland, Finance Director RE: Surplus Property • DATE: July 2, 1980 Request that Council declare the below listed property as surplus and subject to sale before the end of the year so as to compensate for the timing of replacements. '74 Chevrolet automobile '75 Chevrolet automobile '74 Plymouth automobile '67 Chevrolet 21 T. cab chassis Further, request that staff be authorized to sell these locally on a bid basis or to dispose of through the Hennepin County auction. Based on past sales, the City can expect to receive significantly more money by selling some of the vehicles through Hennepin County. • GMV /ljw „ I , MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator FROM: Gregg M. Voxland, Finance Director RE: Sewer Service Billing DATE: July 3, 1980 We currently bill residential sewer service on an average rate. Billing based on each customer's usage has been discussed in the past, but SPUC had informed me that it could not be done with their machine. In a memo dated 6/3/80, Lou VanHout indicated that this method of billing could be at a cost of about $1,550 for additional memory and reprogramming. The cost would be carried by the sewer fund. I feel that this would be a much better way to bill users and request Council authorize staff to coordinate with SPUC to effect implementation. GMV /Itz • /O /.s MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator RE: City Goals for 1981 DATE: July , 11, 1980 Attached is the staff proposal for goals for the City of Shakopee. The goals are based on the following assigned definition of a goal. "goal" - a result you hope to achieve to eliminate a problem or meet a need These goals are therefore designed to meet what staff perceives as the needs of the City of Shakopee. These are broad general "motherhood and apple pie" type statements which will serve only as a basis to set objectives, set priorities, set short term action programs and to evaluate progress. The goal setting process, which the City Council could use to complete a system which results in prioritized objectives and specific action programs, is as follows: 1. Agree (by whatever method you feel comfortable) with a set of goals and sub goals. You can vote on each, as you receive them, trying to reach a consensus or simply throw out all those for which you can not reach a consensus. 2. After the goals and sub goals are set, you need to determine more specific types of action which will enable the City to reach the goals. You can call these objectives. 3. Once objectives are set they should be total prioritized. 4. After the objectives are prioritized by the City Council the staff can recommend and Council approve specific action programs. These will be part of the budget process. As an example of this process I have roughed out one area. GOAL To keep the cost of government to Shakopee residents as low as possible and spread equally among the taxpayers. SUB GOAL - To encourage the development and expansion of a high quality commercial and industrial tax base. OBJECTIVES - 1. Attract large companies to locate major office and manufacturing facilities in Shakopee 2. Attract small companies with growth potential to locate in Shakopee. 3. Attract motels and high quality restaurants. 'Page 2 / -, 4. Encourage expansion of existing industry in Shakopee. 5. Encourage a full time Chamber of Commerce staff. These objectives would be prioritized along with all the other objectives in each area and then staff would include in the budget process short term action programs to meet these objectives. Many of the goals and sub goals may result in the same or similar objectives and these could be consolidated before they were prioritized. I fear this process sounds long, difficult and complicated. It may be, but hopefully as with the five year capital equipment list, each year we would have less to do to revise the goals and objectives. DSR:plk • • /0)Mi • GOALS FOR•THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE 1) To provide for the health, welfare and safety of Shakopee residents. 2) To keep, the cost of government to Shakopee residents .as 'low as possible and spread equally among the taxpayers. • 3) To provide the level of community services desired by the community. 4) To providea variety of high quality residential units for all family sizes and economic groups. 5) To provide recreational cultural and leisure time .. opportunities for Shakopee residents. 6) To protect the natural resources and natural amenities of Shakopee. • 7) To ensure a well planned, economically viable community. 8) To provide a safe efficient and economic transportation system. 9) To coordinate all local efforts with neighboring commun- ities and the various levels of government. 10) To maintain a professional staff capable of seeking the public in an efficient manner. • • • • • • • . • GOAL #1 • • TO ENSURE THE HEALTH WELFARE AND SAFETY OF SHAKOPEE RESIDENTS ' SUBGOALS ' .4 1) To maintain an updated effective natural disaster and evacutation plans. • 2) To provide a well trained, well equipped and efficient police force. 3) To provide a well trained, well equipped and efficient fire department. 4) To provide and maintain a good water supply for domestic use and fire protection. . 5) To provide and maintain a good sanitary sewer system. •6) To provide an affective and efficient storm sewer .system. • • 7) To ensure adequate health inspection of various commercial establishments. • - 8) To regulate the installation of septic systems -and wells to insure the health of residents and protect the ground water supply.. • • • • / 4# • • GOAL #2 TO KEEP THE COST OF GOVERNMENT TO SHAKOPEE RESIDENTS AS LOW AS POSSIBLE AND SPREAD EQUALLY AMONG THE TAXPAYERS SUBGOALS 1) To encourage the development and expansion of a high quality commercial industrial tax base. 2) To` insure that all property in Shakopee and Scott County is valued fairly and equally for tax purposes. 3) To insure a high level of efficiency in all City departments. 4) To change directly, wherever possible, for its ser- . vices provided to individual tax payers. 5) To insure that the costs of government at all levels are changed to the receiving tax payers. 6) To take full advantage of all grant programs to continue and expand the use of federal and state • funding for needed programs and services. 7) To identify new revenue sources to support city services. 8) Seek energy savings and alternative energy sources for city vehicles and buildings. 9) Continue effort to repeal or modify the fiscal dis- parities law. • • is GOAL #3 TO PROVIDE THE LEVEL OF COMMUNITY SERVICES DESIRED BY THE COMMUNITY SUBGOALS 1) To evaluate on a regular basis all city services provided to determine if the demand or need con- tinues to exist. 2) To analyze carefully all requestsfor new municipal services which are requested by citizens. 3) To coordinate with all levels of government to • determine the best level of government to provide . a required service and to avoid duplications. • • • • • • • GOAL #4 TO PROVIDE A VARIETY OF HIGH QUALITY 'RESIDENTIAL LIVING UNITS FOR ALL • FAMILY SIZES AND ALL ECONOMIC GROUPS • SUBGOALS_ 1) Provide land zoned for all types of housing units. 2) Allow flexibility of design through planned unit development. 3) Utilize all available grants and development tools (such as tax increment) to work with potential de- velopment of residential units. 4) Streamline plattery procedures to insure rapid and efficient processing of plats. 5) Control surrounding land uses to insure a quality location for residential units. • • • • • GOAL #5 TO PROVIDE RECREATIONAL, CULTURAL AND LEISURE TIME OPPORTUNITIES FOR SHAKOPEE RESIDENTS SUBGOALS 1) To maintain and upgrade all existing recreational facilities 2) To plan for, and provide new recreational facilities • as needed because of new growth or changing demands. • 3) To provide programs for all age and interest groups. 4) To coordinate all facilities and programs with other public agencies (schools, churches, counties) 5) To encourage cultural events and activities. • • • • • • • GOAL #6 TO PROTECT THE NATURAL RESOURCES • AND NATURAL AMENITIES OF SHAKOPEE SUBGOALS • • 1) To adopt and enforce regulations which will require consideration of natural resources for any development proposal. 2) To utilize zoning to protect natural features and agricultural areas. .3) To' require in depth environmental studies for any excavation or mining proposals. • • • • lD 1yv • • GOAL #7 • • TO ENSURE A WELL PLANNED, ECONOMINCALLY VIABLE COMMUNITY • • SUBGOALS • 1) Adopt and follow a comprehensive plan. 2) Implement economic analysis of all development proposals. 3) Develop and implement a strategy to stablilize and further develop downtown Shakopee. • 4) Plan to keep the character of the community 'devised by the residents. • • • • • • • • • • • GOAL #8 TO PROVIDE A SAGE EFFICEINT AND ECONOMIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM • SUBGOALS.::• • 1) To provide for the transportation needs of all age and economic groups in Shakopee. 2) To provide main transit where feasible. 3) To provide an efficient, well maintained street system. 4) To analyze and develop alternative traffic solutions for downtown Shakopee, 5) To get a high level bridge built across the Minnesota River. the Shakopee Bypass built. tir • • • l8 vy✓ GOAL #9 TO COORDINATE ALL LOCAL EFFORTS WITH NEIGHBORING COMMUNITIES AND THE VARIOUS LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT • SUBGOALS ' 1) To maintain active City involvement in the decision making processes. of all levels of government. 2) To work with neighboring communities on major projects and decisions of mutual concern. • • • • • • • • • GOAL #10 • TO MAINTAIN A PROFESSIONAL STAFF CAPABLE OF SERVING THE PUBLIC IN AN EFFICIENT MANNER SUBGOALS 1) To encourage promotion from within - where possible. 2) To encourage continual education for existing employees. 3) To recruit and retain professional employees for all positions. 4) To keep working conditions and compensation at a competitive level. t MEMO O I TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator RE: Capital Items List DATE: July 11, 1980 Attached is the capital equipment list for 1981. We have made changes in what is included this year, in anticipated revenue and of course in the scheduling for the purchase of equipment. The attached typed list is as it appeared last year and the penciled changes are what is being recommended now. Following is a list of the specific changes being made. SUMMARY SHEET Revenues 1. The beginning =balance of the Revenue Sharing Fund on January 1, 1980 was $128,849 rather than $134,671. This is due to changes in the costs of items purchased in 1979 after the capital item list was approved. 2. The beginning balance of the Capital Equipment Revolving Fund was $111,219 rather than $100,000 for the same reason. There are the two revenue sources used for capital equipment. 3. In 1980 we expect to receive reimbursement for City land at the elderly high -rise therefore there is more from the sale of assests than we assumed. 4. Total revenue•therefore was $269,178 for 1980 rather than the $247,671 budgeted. 5. The original projection of SPUC when the new agreement was signed was that their contribution would rise above the minimum of $240,000 per year by $35,000 in 1981, $50,000 in 1982, $65,000 in 1983 and $75,000 in 1984. The latest projection is that the contribution will not exceed the minimum until after 1983 and that in 1984 it will exceed it by $20,000 and by $20,000 in 1985. I would assume that their estimate is on the conservative side and as SPUC raises their rates that the gross margin will rise more rapidly. 6. The industry agreement income ends with 1980. 7. We have removed entirely from this list the expenditure and revenue for parks since this has to be kept in a separate fund. This needs to be discussed by the City Council. Page -2- � 0 �R/ Expenditures Microfilm: We are recommending that the City not buy micro filming equipment, but rather that we reach an agreement with the Shakopee School District to use their equipment. At this time we are still not ready to begin this process because current staff does not have sufficient time to begin. Typewriters: We are budgeting a replacement typewriter for the Administrative office in 1980 and one replacement in 1983 for Assessing. City Hall Addition: We are'dropping the City Hall addition scheduled for 1982 because of City Council direction that we begin to prepare for the construction of a new City Hall. We have assumed that the new City Hall will cost in the area of 1 million dollars and that the sale of general obligation bonds will be needed to finance its construction. We will request that the City Council include in the 1981 general fund budget an appropriatation of $5,000 to prepare preliminary architectual drawings of the proposed new City Hall. The first tasks of course will be to locate the new facility and then to design it. We anticipate that the present.City Hall building will be sufficient in size to last through 1983. We have budgeted funds to replace the Air Conditioner in the new half of City Hall in 1981 and the furnace in the old half of City Hall in 1981. Police Cars: The police cars now in use have approximately 40,000 miles after being used for one year. We now plan to drive them as far as possible and then dispose of them. In the capital item budge we had anticipated going to 4 squad cars in 1982. We now do not forsee the need for 4 cars until 1985 at the earliest. The next result is the cutting of 6 police cars from the budget over the next 4 years. This is augmented somewhat by the budgeting to replace the 4 wheel drive vehicle in 1982. A detailed memo on vehicles is included in this packet. • Radios: A detailed memo on police radios is included, however, gen- erally the portable radios we purchased in 1979 are proving to be unreliable and we are recommending replacing them in 1981. Police Department Remodeling: The police department has requested that funds be budgeted to remodel the entry way and secretarial area to make a more efficient operation. I am recommending that we budget for this and discuss details at the time the actual work is proposed. Fire Department: - - Moved new grass rig back to 1983 - Added rescue truck replacement in 1985 - Added some modification to doors in their building for security. - Added more rescue air bottles for Small Air packs. • , page -3- l6 )e- Street Department: - Added a new street flusher in.1985 to replace the used one purchased in 1979. - Moved the port end loader replacement from 1981 to 1983 based on condition of existing equipment. - Added a band saw and an AC /DC welder Park Department: - Removed the two replacement mower - tractors back to 1982 from 1981 - Added a replacement one ton stake truck for 1983 Civil Defense: - We have added $6,000 in 1981 and 1982 for ten additional Civil Defense Sirens. There are app- arently no more grants available. In8ome cases after discussion with department heads I have re- moved items of capital equipment which they had requested although I believe that the department heads are in agreement with the items presented here. OTHER EXPENITURES We have deleted or left off from this list the following items which will need to be funded and for which funds will have to be found. 1. Purchase of land beside Public Works Building. Estimate is • $50,000. In addition we need to purchase the railroad right of way when it is available. 2. •Expansion of Tahpah Park Parking lot - $20,000 3. Water and sewer for Tahpah Park - $40,000 4. Purchase and construction of parking lot owned by railroad in front of Huber building, between Holmes and Lewis. Estimate - $40,000 • 5. Park acquisition and improvement 6. New Fire Station. The potential sources of funding these items are as follows: 1. General funds (tax levy) • 2. Transfer funds from capital items fund. 3. Park dedication fund 4. Assess benifitted properties /B Page -4- Conclusion: Shakopee still remains in an excellent postition to be able to provide the equipment needed to best do the work required and keep labor costs to a minimum. The capital items budget is working well and the five year projections prepared by the department heads for the last 3 years have proven pretty accurate and have been a good base upon.which to program future expenditures for these big ticket items. • This will, if continued, eliminate the need for borrowing for these kind of purchases. The loss of the industry agreement money in 1981 is a big loss but because of the planning over the last three years we have built up a • balance in the equipment fund and can now continue to purchase this equipment when needed rather than borrow or wait several years until funds are accumulated. The new projection for the SPUC contribution is an- unanticipated loss of revenue and has an effect on our budget. It may well speed the day when funds for these purchases will have to be again provided by the general funds. And finally, we have one large assumption which while we feel it is reasonably conservative, is a revenue source totally beyond our control. Revenue Sharing funds are anticipated to continue through 1985 at a re- duced level. These funds could be cut off or increased and we will simply have to react to the occurance. The fund balance in the capital equipment.list gives'us a cushion to rely on in the event that funds are elimintated. In any event it appears that the cut will not come during the election year of 1980. This budget is of considerable importance and we shall spend time on it to be sure it adequately reflects the priorities of the City Council. • /n/so CAPITAL EQUIPMENT LIST - SUMMARY ?■ 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 REVENUE SHARING FUND Fund Balance 111/80 Et 2.. sA] Revenue Sharing $1 � X2:4 �1 $100 000 > '$100;000 $100 , 000 $100,000 71 so v o v Interest 5;000 -7000 3 3;66-O 3;Q-90Scco 3,000 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT REVOLVING FUND Fund Balance 1/1/80 E/ 2' J Industry Agreement 100,000 S.P.U.C. Increment 3 - 5-T00O 5X.0.0 55-860 7- 5;-A90 2 -9 °`'`) ,,0),000 Sale of Assests 3-,-QQ_02%p 3- 5-$402° °° 5- - -B60 Z °° Q Zc yuno Interest o °` 5 ° 00) poo o� 00 5 , 64 8 i X9-0 � y, 5 ; 990 ,S 1�9 ; Q0.0 t � 0 1-6 ; 9�9�0 c �, 0 I 7 000 • TOTAL REVENUE 2 - �712�� lib 1 #;$00' ° v0) X00 �Z'� ° °° 1 v`�ovo noo gq oo� x`3 -6 0 t 7�5 9110 1 EXPENDITURE PER LIST 172 r4-9-79-00 13$90 I:9 0 700 1 $80 r 4 - 8 - , - - 5 - 0 0 ,z 1 °0 l o °oJ EXCESS (Deficeincy) REVENUE 1'1 7- 1 (3 go) ° (3 2 ° - ' Lq9 ()° 4475-00 QCs ° C22 moo) BALANCES AVAILABLE LlLy $ 3� - ; 7 -71 �� $ 3-Cr�8 -7 -1 �{ t z'" $3-2-7-3-1-7-141)) S BALANCES $15 °t � o° ' $�3'9�8- 7-1 �/ 5 V6) • CAPITAL ITEMS LIST 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 /94; Administration & Finance -M i c - ro f i lm —a-H —h e-e-o-rd -s- 6,000 - -4- Typewriter 1,500 1,100 Sound System 2,4800 Bldg. Insp. Automobile 2,700 . Government Buildings . Add4tion —to— - i —H-a11 — 1- s-t—F -1 oor - -3-9 ; ee 2nd— F-1-oo-i= - - X000— (Add -it ro-na 1--) - C -a -r -p e-t -Ex i s ty- ng —G4- y —Ha- 3,300 Replace 5 ton H /V /AC 7,000 - ei- H- a- 11 —M-ed i f i ca t i -ems 8,000 13.,; C;T/ NA "/ 1 Police Replace Squad Cars 1 cc r �> >v U °o (3 25 sou (3) ��C. 74%0 Re q (3)19,000 (3)� ?_1; 750 ( p 02:4,000 ( 372 - 000 (4)-3 90 • (�1) �3��'O �° Replace-S with 4 x 4 I 9,000 (1) - 7 - 77549-0 /0,s -, 0 (1) - T400iz,,e Monitor for Outside of Building 1,p00 Radio Equipment 9,Q00 (4') Jo / 0c•° , Body Armor 1,700 ( Visibars 1,045 (,jai /,ova Varda Alarm System - 2,100 Night Vision Device y;Jeu re , c - �,�d� 1, 600 4,000 Breathalyzer 1 5002.° Traffic Radar (1) 2,500 (1) '2;6 --'Q" (1) — 2;60.02- bc'` Holding Area Monitor /, l Cs9 1,000 6- 4.5d /)i%o -- 02 'C c -y- • • Page 2 qo . Ni 19179 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 / ::_r Engineering • Survey Equipment 3,000 Radio 1,000 1,050 1,500 Typewriter 1,500 . Print File 2,000 • Blue Print Machine 5,000 Mobile Radio (2) 1,700 Fire N,ov;c ,� ,-„�,, , ✓18, µ z. .4..,-- ,...3,, _; 1 /n0 Replace Existing Tank Truck 3 00 27a•c.c New Grass Rig 1-5-800. i5, r no Replacement of Fire Hose 3,200 3,500 - 3;800 ._; •4 OCR -.3 - 4- 600 = :-'� - 4- 089 - -.rz., _; i (1,000 ft. of 11/2; 1000 ft. of 2-1.) • Misc. Equipment 2,000 2—eee 2,000 - - 2-080_ 2 _0 0- aesc :. c- 'TrAG /f • R e... c,i ..7 4 N.•/ r' e..- G e /vi u F J: cl Por r ^j i•• P tiC • -.71i 4 :.I f 2e0 Street 22000 Self - propelled Vibrator Roller 5,500 • • Back Hoe w /quick Hitch 40,000 21/2 Ton Truck w /sander Underbody Blade 35,000 32,000 3/4 Ton P - i - e - ku w • 5,900 Street Flusher 8 - Salt Storage Structure 009 q 0a0 3` '4; Sign Machinc _ 1.800 &&am-p-a- e-t-or 10_00 - - e ae — a - nd Land s - e - a - p - - 1000 Street Sweeper 60,000 Snow Blower (used) 25,000 Paint Stripper .1 575 5 Ton Truck w /sander & Underbody/wing/.40 w - 3 gg�;./c,,, ?co Front End Loader -PO-700Q 7c 000 Curb Form ' 3,000 Boom .15-99 Page 3 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 • Street (Cont d) • • Fork Lift Tines 1,400 Snow Box 3,000 • Shop Engine Analyzer 5,000 Brake Drum /Rotor Machine 3,000 • Lathe '2 Drill Press • 1,000 R A' d Ac- /4c �:a.lder Park 2 Mower Tractors ( Tractor w /Bucket , Cl 8 • 5 , 900 . Groundskeeper 6,000 Small Rider Mower k..,.)/c. .,„/ Large Rider Mower 7,500 Fertilizer Spreader - 1,400 Hydr. Broom to Sweep x;008 j y uu Fairway -type Gang Mower 215 099- •3.Scco Mower Decks 2 -000_ z ,s-oo Large Mower Deck - 3,T. /4 - 3,000 Bob cat 4,500 -u Meteor - -i a- �Ra -r -k 2,1160 a.co Z /9s ic7s1 rc7S7— 3 /9 Po i f) ct 2_ I c / 1.1 • . , CAPITAL ITEMS LIST 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 /G ; -- Administration & Finance - Mi -crof i rm a -1 -1 —R e- c•o-rd-s- "--6-T8 - Typewriter 1,500 1,100 Sound System 2,800 Bldg. Insp. Automobile 2,700 Government Buildings . - Addi- tion- to- G-i- ty- H- a -1 -1- -1 -s -t F= 1 -o0— • -3-9.7000- -2nd -F 1 -oar- 1 -4 ®ee —EA d"d i ±ane 1-) • - &a-r•p e -t Ex i s-t i ng -C -i t y -H a -1 -1 3 ,13 00 Replace 5 ton H /V /AC 7,000 •C-i -t y- H -a -1- — Mod- rf- i -e-a -t i-o-ns 8,000 `' i3,.,ldr- c.T/ /'/A// `2 C . i Police / �/ ' • (i) "3 et-c: •L ")/L ^,UJP (3)2...s .s--,:o (���. %e% _ Replace Squad Cars (3)19,000 (3) ?_1;750 (3,)24 (4 327000 (4 (4)3 Replace Squad with 4 x 4 1 . _._ 9,000 -- - -- (1) '7- 40 , v ,s <<� (1) ' _e Monitor for Outside of Building 1,800 Radio Equipment 9,000 (s-) io,cc • Body Armor 1,700 C71-1-5-7Q0 Visibars •1,045 6614 c;; c, Varda Alarm System 2,100 1,600 - -i g;t -is•- -�t- = ce- v:de-, r -c o dr 4,000 ' Breathalyzer •1;-500 ,10 :'.• Traffic Radar (1) 2,500 (1) - 2: - T600 11 : 7 '' ) (1) - "2;60.02 .'' Holding Area Monitor t. cc.c. L eg f':_ . i r -. - S' _ /..:^,...--, 1,000 &-N, • ' • Page 2 19179 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 • Engineering Survey Equipment 3,000 Radio 1,000 1,050 1,500 Typewriter 1,500 . Print File 2,000 Blue Print Machine 5,000 Mobile Radio (2) 1,700 Fire ,,,.:c Replace Existing Tank Truck 3 0;0001 New Grass Rig I 1.x;9-0.0 is;c Replacement of Fire Hose 3 , 3,500 `37800 . -- 4 -2 -00- - 4- 600 - 4 - 7000-. (1,000 ft. of 12j 1000 ft. of .2 "4 s-e gr�H m4 2,000 x 000 -2-000- 2,004 094 2. -904 2 000 - f+esc , r•Kt ✓, , 1i a so :c .Ti „c,- 4,J,v.• e- i vt 4 • 4y i).• :•.-, ,1;:..- S. ! a- Street .2 o Z' C • • Self- propelled Vibrator Roller 5,500 Back Hoe w /quick Hitch 40,000- - 24 Ton Truck w /sander Underbody Blade 35,000 32,000 3/4 Ten —P -i e- ku -p—w -/ 4WD-- 5 , 900 Street Flusher 81000 3c Salt Storage Structure - 47000- q 00.6) £ i g n— Ma- c -th4 -t e - 1 8 0 0 Eomp-a-c -tor- 1.100 Fe-ne- —a-n l— L- a-nel- s-eapi -n -g . - - - -- -5;000 Street Sweeper 60,000 Snow Blower (used) 25,000 Paint Stripper .1,575 5 Ton Truck w /sander & Underbody /wing/P/0-: -- 3-3 -00p_ 2``-' Front End Loader 7 -p - T p gg- ye c Curb Form 3,000 ' Boom . 1§90 • Page 3 °�, 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 Street (Cont'd) • Fork Lift Tines 1,400 Snow Box 3,000 Shop Engine Analyzer 5,000 Brake Drum /Rotor Machine 3,000 Lathe - - 2 - ;000- 3,co:. Drill Press • 1,000 /I� / : ,. ..;:: "i:t r Park - 2 Mower Tractors ( )-1 (l) i2, coo • Tractor w /Bucket 8,000 • -3- -/-4-- T-on —F - c-ku -p 5 ,X900 . Groundskeeper 6,000. Small Rider Mower w/c.../T, r3%, 4)- 2; 600. roc Large Rider Mower 7,500 A Fertilizer Spreader - 1,400 Hydr. Broom to Sweep _71 -009 / yvu Fairway -type Gang_ Mower 2 0 Mower Decks 2 TD00- 1 ; s -5 0 Large Mower Deck- 3P / 4,7- r-- )1 3,000 Bob cat - 4,500 1 Pump - --- Memo- r- i- a- ]_— P- -a -r -k 2,r0 • pc.._ /1. ,(' 1 Z TcJ - }7AfXc. r, , 4c.k • P/v ,. 'IX y / A • 1 C 7 SI / 2- e. 2 V V $ I I : $ t • ":4 • of EHAdr p- CITY O F SI-I A • PEE /2. I r ���4 tf t } •Ry`•fi 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 o t' �, t; cK!bl[35 MEMO TO: DOUG REEDER FROM: JIM KARKANEN, PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. SUBJECT: ENGINE STAND FOR MECHANIC DATE: • This memo is submitted for approval to purchase a heavy duty engine stand large enough to carry a truck engine which is scheduled for a complete overhaul. We have been using our mechanic's personal engine stand which is designed for passenger car engines, however, because of the extra weight of the truck engine, we must use a heavy duty (1000 lb.) engine stand for this overhaul. Our cost for the engine stand is $153.77 from Motor Parts Service. The cost of a comparable engine' stand from Auto Central Supply was an additional $40. • • • • • • %% a a+t iKtetftt?tt @tr1a�4 s ►r+i¢�ij¢r!i=Rlt +° t °af�a?:t' t t +tof %!�¢ %tf ;liir+th� }� , t ?t2:d F;• ?::`t f, i t -.%° E .12,.. _ %• a;•:; ;�;_!�•e, %:;.t¢tt[!sesi�ka•.> ect. •e' :t t., +r =3 a t a tt_�; tt e t is: .k Ea i C t � ;2 .t t ; ;i 3 t 'rt ;•;C • •; - ::a'•'••,. 't'•' :'% % �r•:•�:� ,x:'t �•� st • j, 7:::::,..:::: - t • e 7 � 3 -.• -•' t :.ta.'dlS+i° . .. II2I - .. M1•K""°,',gi1•A+'wMM+ . wti.: rw+• ur. r. n. n+. ryArytn++. !!�dA.wiwW.lrl.....+iv✓GR ^ri'I "••..rr.r /66LV /0 MEMO TO: Douglas S. Reeder, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre, Director of HRA RE: Advertisement for bids for Kmart fencing DATE: July 11,1980 • At the July 15, 1980 meeting of the Shakopee Housings and Redevelopment Authority, the Authority will consider Resolution No. 80 -5, a Resolution authorizing Execution of Amendment to Redevelopment Contract. This resolution revises the improvements which will be provided to Kmart under our tax - increment project to include a fence. As the City has previously agreed to administer the construction of the improve- ments for the Kmart tax - increment site, I would like to re- quest that the City advertise for bids to undertake this project on behalf of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority. , y a f,, M�'t� City ®f Shakopee � " r5N p K O P f E`\\ POLICE DEPARTMENT "p" _ _,,, , � #,,,,g,,,.:.-,•, 476 South Gorman Street ,.�� • � ; !;')L_ — . � SIiAK MINNESOTA 55379 �" ' _= ,- ' P E c � . � Tel 445 6666 ; � dt ; t j ' -Y: r C' , y 55379 fi ti I TO: Doug Reeder FROM: Tom Brownell DATE: July 11, 1980 SUBJECT: Capital Items Budget 1. Squad Car Replacement: Our current inventory of vehicles will require the purchase of one squad type vehicle in 1981. and two similar type in 1982. 2. Radio Equipment: 5 mobile units are required to replace the present portable radios and scanners which have proven to be unreliable and costly to maintain. The radios will be in- stalled in patrol type vehicles which are subjected to heavy usage. The mobile type radio has a seven year period of usage with minimal repair. The present system will require an investment of $5,500 to improve performance, but will not ensure reliability. Recently during a weekend, one of six radios functioned. The existing radios will be used for communications with the Public Works Department in the event of a natural disaster and the Police Department in non - patrol vehicles. . 3. Video Camera Equipment: Several departments are video taping persons suspected of driving under the influence. They have experienced a 50% reduction in Officer court appearances. During 1979, 104 persons were charged for D.W.I. violations. Officers spent 176 hours in court at a cost of $2,520.00. While the City currently has a video system, it is used by four departments, which limits availability and prevents permanent installation, which is necessary to prevent damage to the unit by our clients. 4. Breathalyzer: This unit is used to measure the amount of alcohol in a person's system. Our present unit is several years old and frequently in need of repair. 5. Traffic Radar: The new unit will replace an existing unit which has been taken out of service, as the cost of repair exceeds the value of the unit. go eSezvz go Pzotect . Capital Items Budget Page -2- 6. Monitor Booking- Breathalyzer Room ($1,000), Remodel Entry- Office Area ($4.000), Install Garage Door Opener ($3,000: The items requested are required to provide security for personnel processing arrested persons, confine persons in custody to a specific area of the building limiting their access to the entire facility, provide security for records and computer terminal, as required by Statute governing confidentiality of information, and provide an area for service to the general public. 7. Civil Defense Warning System: Install one additional warn- ing siren in 1981, and in 1982, to insure adequate warning to the public in the event of disaster. • Ni 1 ,•_�: • 'Unite) Zf ates Zerraf e WASHINGTON. D.C. 20510 • j May 15, 1980 The Hon. Walt Harbeck Mayor 1305 West 6th Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Walt: Because of your interest in General Revenue Sharing, I want to keep you abreast of actions the U.S. Senate is taking with respect funding the program during the next fiscal year. For the past week the Senate has been debating the FY '81 budget. As you may know, the Senate Budget Committee had recommended that the FY '81 funding level for revenue sharing be reduced by $1.7 billion. If this recommendation had been adopted, the states would have been eliminated from the program, at least for the next fiscal year. I was a leader in the drive to amend the Budget Resolution and restore $700 million to the program for FY '81. This amendment passed the Senate by the overwhelming margin of 59 to 30; it was the`only change in the Budget Resolution that the Senate passed. The vote represents a clear preference for general revenue sharing over categorical programs, and a clear indication that the Senate is ready to rely on the judgement of state and local governments to determine their own spending priorities. It marks a first major and long - awaited step toward restructuring domestic financial assistance programs. • A copy of my statement, delivered during the budget debate is enclosed. I have also enclosed my statement before the Inter - Governmental Subcommittee during the May 14 mark -up of the Grant Reform bill. cerely, • Dave Durenberger United States Senator DD /stf Enclosure • S enator Dave Durenberger Statement Before Senate Intergovernmental Relations Subcommittee S. 878, • the GRANT REFORM BILL May 14, 1980 • • Mr. Chairman, today we are considering one of the most significant pieces of legislation before the Congress. I commend you, and Senator Roth, for working so diligently and persistently to bring this bill to the point of mark- up. The need for a Federal Assistance Reform bill is long overdue. The leaders of this Subcommittee, and its members, know that we have needed grant reform for a long time. Now, however„ the rest of the Senate seems to realize it, also. The budget debate of the past week and the vote on the Revenue Sharing amendment show that an overwhelming majority of our colleagues are ready for a change in our intergovernmental fiscal system. They recognize that'we cannot afford a wasteful, duplicative, top -heavy system of categorical grants. Furthermore, by agreeing to cut admin- istrative expenses of executive branch agencies by 6 %, we in the Senate have voted in favor of more streamlined, effective management. We must now follow through with a grant reform bill that will lessen administrative burdens of Washington',program officers, and State and local grant recipients. We must work with the executive branch and ' with state and local officials to ensure that every federal. dollar is spent effectively. For years, it has been common knowledge that the grant - in -aid system is out of control. No one thought, when each categorical aid program was enacted, that the end result would be a system that distorts the balance of power between goverments, and weakens the ability of the average citizen to hold Government accountable. No one thought we would produce a system for implementing national goals that is costly to all involved, inefficient and ineffective. However, after the enactment of 492 separate grant programs and the expenditure of $8.2 billion annually (for fiscal year 1979), that is exactly the kind of system we have created. The Federal Government gives one -fifth of its annual budget to State and local, governments; that income accounts for 25 percent of all State and local revenue. It is a tremendous expenditure, and a large part of it is being wasted. The budget resolution adopted by the Senate curtails the growth of federal aid dollars, and reduces the percentage of State and local income received from the federal government to about 23.6% of all State and local revenue.' The dollar amounts and the percentages remain high. An OMB draft report, "A Study of Federal Assistance Management" points to serious flaws in the grant system. One section of the report summarizes the perceptions of 200 county officials toward grants in aid. Their attitude can • be stated in one sentence, and I quote, "In general, most county officials do not believe the federal intergovern- •mental assistance system works to the benefit of all concerned." County officials had many complaints: the Federal Government does not trust local grant recipients; program requirements are not flexible; Federal officials fail to provide technical and'financial assistance to local recipients; Federal bureaucrats do not manage the grant system properly. The county officials are right. The Federal Government has not exhibited much trust in grant recipients, as evidenced by the innumerable requirements attached to Federal programs. The 492 separate grant programs carry with them over 150 different citizen participation requirements, for example. The paperwork and reporting requirements cost nearly $2 billion per year. County officials estimate that the paperwork costs to all levels of Government average about 33 percent of each grant award. I am convinced that these problems can be corrected. I believe S. 878 is a giant step in the direction of reform. Today, I will offer an amendment to S. 878 that goes a step beyond the reforms it outlines. This amendment, which I will describe later, directs the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations to study the feasibility and cost effectiveness of adapting the private sector model of competition to the delivery of public services. Several state and local governments have experimented with this competitive approach, and find that it works well. The ACIR study would assess the applicability of the competitive approach on a broader scale. In closing, I again want to commend you, Mr. Chairman, and Senator Roth for your commitment to grant reform. • • • • • ' :11111• LI lig CBS t.onal - Record .4„0, United States ivA"eks . PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 96t m CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 126 • , WAbHINGTON, THURSDAY, MAY 8, 1980 • No. 74 Senate. Mr. DURENBERGER. Mr.. President, The- Eederal Government does not during the past, several months. I have earn the windfall inflation tax and must made clear thy firm commitment to gen- . not be permitted to benefit from it. The eral revenue sharing. My advocacy of Federal Government has created a tax this program, though, goes back more system that makes itself the prime bene - than . a decade. I have been promoting ficiary of inflation. For each. 1-percent general revenue sharing since its birth rise in the Consumer Price Index, Fed - in the late 1960's; now that I am in a eral tax receipts rise by • approximately position to affect its future . I have no 1.5 percent. This process permits the intention of administering final rites in Federal Government to profit from an- 1980. • nual increases without the necessity of Let me make it clear to my colleagues congressional actions --a paradox in this that general revenue sharing is not just era of increasing demand for Govern - another program of Federal aid to State .went accountability. It is, in effect, a • and local governments. It . was created in 1980 version of taxation without repro- an era called "new federalism." It was sentation. designed by those in this Government The inflation windfall • makes it in- * who. believed in the constitutional guar- creasingly difficult for State and local antees of federalism. It was built on a 'governments to impose additional taxes recognition of the erosion of that system . to meet their needs. Federal tax collec- caused by a mounting Sow of our citi- • bons have more than doubled in the past ten's financial resources. being drained 4 years, despite the imposition of no into the national treasury by a taxing new taxes and, in fact, a tax cut in 1978. system tied to inflation. The Federal While many State and local governments Government has created and perpetu- have acted responsibly and reduced the ated a tax system that makes general tax burden through tax cuts or indexing, revenue sharing with State, county, and ! the Federal Government has allowed in- local • governments mandatory. General nation to pour an additional $300 billion revenue sharing is. the price the Federal j into its•coffers since 1976. Government must . pay -to other jurisdic Now, those responsible actions are •tions as long as it insists on collecting coming back to haunt State and local- the windfall inflation tax that results governments. Most. States are operating from an unindexed tax system In the black and some have been fortu- In March I introduced S. 2414; a bill nate enough to run a surplus. A few to reauthorize general revenue sharing States have _even been able to cut taxes. • for 4 yeas at its current level of $6.9 bil- t *We in the Federal Government should lion per year. During the life of this bill. be praising these efforts. We should be the Federal Government would be called following the example of fiscal respeni- on to share a total of $274 billion with sibility. We should be heeding the mes- other governments. . - sage that is coming from our constitu- Mr. President, during the same 4 -year ents through their representatives in span the Federal Government, by con - 1 State and local governments. . servative estimates, . will collect more Instead, the mood of some of my dis- • than $245 billion from individual tax - i tinguished colleagues toward State and payers as a result of an unindexed tax' local governments is to acknowledge this system. In other words, 8.„2414 asks the responsiveness by slashing general reve- Federal Government to share about $1 flue sharing. In 1979 the opposition to out of every $10 it will collect from its GRS took' the form of congressional re- windfall inflation. tax. action to resolutions passed by 30 That is hardly Federal largess. It is States calling for a constitutional con- • avarice that some would disguise 1141 ben- veation to balance the Federal budget. eficence. Those who argue against gen- • This year, . the message that came from eral revenue sharing are playing both those resolutions got through to every ends against the middle. • They want to Member of Congress as clearly as propo- reduce general revenue sharing, while sition 13.made misers out of Jerry Brown and the California Legislature. insisting that the Federal Government n its collection o! the windfall Now, some in Congress want to - cut persist i�� general revenue sharing, killing the mes- senger_ that brings the bad news that we must balsLnne the Federal budget, ins developing options. for its future. So far, we stead of rewarding him. have seen studies on the fiscal impact of • revenue sharing, on the distributional impact Mr. President, the State surplus issue of revenue participation requirements. We is a strawman. Only 15 States have a have seen studies dealing with formula al- surplus and all but two are major energy- location issues. But we have seen no bill. So, or food - producing States. And, surpluses last Wednesday 1 introduced my own bill. of the future will be • concentrated in a S. 2414, t o re- authorize general Revenue handful of energy- producing States. sharing for four years. Cuts in general revenue sharing on the Fiery' after months of waiting. we know where the President stands. His proposal is basis of State surpluses is asking the vast to eliminate general revenue sharing to the majority of States to pay for nature's• states. kindness to a few States fortunate ' I know the argument he' will use, because enough to have ,energy resources who in ; I've heard it so many times before: Why this and coming years will benefit from t federal government share- its the failures of past national energy pal- ; ny�ney w ith the states when so many states Kies. • are running surpluses and cutting taxes? According to the National Governors' As- In March, I addressed the National . sociation, this year only 15 states have a League of Cities. In that speech, I laid surplus, and all but two are major energy. or out my arguments for general revenue food producing states. The surpluses of the sharing,- -including my rebuttal of the . future will be concentrated in a few energy - State surplus issue. I ask unanimous con- pr states. Four states — Texan. Alaska, California and sent that- my speech be printed in to- ' Louisiana —will collect $104 billion in the day's RECORD. - next decade from increased income taxes. . There being no objection, the speech severance taxes and royalty payments as a was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, result of oil price decontrol. With s 12 per - as follows: cent severance tax, Louisiana finances 20 percent of its budget from oil payments. As SpatCS BY SENATOR* Dsys Dvsswsssass we switch from oil to coal, Montana with a Thank you. 30 percent severance tax will finance a large I want to make it clear from the beginning share of its government at our expense. To of my speech that I support a full reauthor- point to another, better.. example, the State ization of general revenue sharing and I am of Alaska, which right now has a budget committed to a balanced federal budget. I surplus of al billion, expects a surplus of know the people here today will understand $28.5 billion by the end of the decade. A re- that those goals are not contradictory; in cent Associated Press • story reported that fact, they compliment one another. contests are being conducted in Alaska to General revenue sharing is one of the most determine how that surplus should be spent. effective and efficient federal programs. It . And; because of the "tax effect" formula in returns a fair share of the taxpayers' dollars the present GRS program.. the 42 non -oil to the people who can use it most wisely— producing states will receive proportionately those of you in local government. Compared less of whatever revenue sharing there is. to categorical grant programs which return Most energy poor states are hard pressed 69 cents a dollar in services, GRS returns to meet their obligations„ and are con - 99 cents. - fronted with the difficult task of stemming I've been around revenue sharing since an out- migration of people, businesses, and Its birth in the late 60s and early 70e in the with them, the tax base. These states need National Governors Association.. I have no relief from federal income tax and state intention of administering final rites in 1980 energy tax - induced fiscal dlsparaties in the I will not stand idly by while the Admin- form of General Revenue Sharing. istration dismantles this program in the ` The state surplus issue is a strawman. It name of fiscal prudence. The President was la being used by members of the Administra- right Friday when he called for discipline. tion and Congress as an excuse to cut rave- But, that discipline must start in the White nue _ sharing. Even those who have ' only House. It must start with belt - tightening superficial knowledge of state government that is productive; not belt - tightening that are aware that all but two states, Connecti- will choke state and local government. cut and Vermont, are prohibited by their • In the past few weeks, Jessie Battley, your constitutions from having budget deficits. president, has delivered the same message Most states limit borrowing • authority, so if to two Senate subcommittees that I am de- there is a revenue shortfall, or over- expend- livering to you today: Reenactment of gen iture, the options for making up the dif- eral revenue sharing must be among ours Terence are limited. To be prudent and top legislative priorities. constitutional, states must budget a surplus. In January, it seemed that we had a poor -. The significant issue, as I just mentioned, is erful ally in President Carter. After nearly the size of that surplus relative to the total four . years of complaining about the pro- operating budget. gram. especially the inclusion of the States.. With a few exception, and again I mean President Carter sent to Congress a budget the energy -rich states, the so -called that called for re- enactment of the program' "wealthy" states cannot be expected to re- at the current level of funding. But like tain their surpluses. The National Associa- he's done for 3% years, the President im- tion of State Budget Officers reported that mediately shifted gears. Days passed, then the total state revenues grew by 8.8 percent weeks, and none of us in the Congress saw between fiscal 1978 and fiscal 1979, but ex- the Administration's proposal in bill.form. penditures increased by 14 percent. As a re- Prom the beginning, this Administration suit, state unobligated 'balances declined has vacillated on its position regarding the • from $8.9 billion at the end of fiscal 1978, future of the program. For well over a .year, to $4.3 billion at the end of fiscal 1979. State specialists have been at work in the Tress- balances now are at their lowest level of my Department conaucting research on the recent years. impact of the revenue sharing program and • 2 • The state revenue decline directly at- federal government has an obligation to ttibutable to two factors: tar relief and the lave some of these funds back.-with no strings expectation of a recession. States have been • attached. The federal Meniment does . not forced to give tax roof in the face of zitisen; earn the inflation windfall and should not wessures. - People an mory, and r i g htf a u y , be permitted to benefit from it- at the ex- . so, that the federal -goverment takes such Pence Of state rnd loosl governments.. 1 have s large portion of their income; then the introduced 8. 1974, a bill that would remove state takes another chunk, and finally, the inflation from the federal ineome tae, capital city raises the taxes on their houses, and the gains tax and depreciation. This legislation county takes another portion of the little bit :would correct the 87-year-old windfall profit • of income that is lett. Citizens began to •p• tax which the federal government hat im• ply pressure where they knew they could get Ind on the people of this country. It . results -.at the city: county,..and state level& would follow the example set by the states Thosw wt' have Proposition 13 propoals that have already indexed theft' income taxes. - and their equivalents in a number of states Another fundamental tenet of our eye- and local governments throughout the cone . tam of government which try. This induces some good examples of tax Poles makers fail to recognize is the rein• tionship between States and their localities. reform, but all at the state and local level.. y -amine states now partially shield: stitution lately. or have•reTiewed the history I'm not sure these people have read the con- Twent home owners from property tax overloads: through state - financed circuit breakers. : of our grealize overnmental system e c thaw t would More than halt of the slats sales taxes that the citis. oouea nd now exempt food and drug sales ar grant other local governments are creatures of the income tax credits equivalent to the amount ! State• a created by the state. responsible to the state, and • funded by the state. spent for these items. The fiscal interdependence of the states Another healthy result of the Proposition . and their local governments is well docu- 13 mood is the indaang of inflation out of ; mented. In Minnesota more than 80,percent state income taxes. Colorado. Arizona an Mi : of state taxes are returned to local govern - California adoptet indexing proposals asst ; meat. At least 40 percent of the States' share year. My own state of Minnesota now in- ' of GRS funds are passed directly through by dazes inflation and politics out of our state 'the states. Where the money is not given to income tames, depsite the tact that over 80% cities, counties and townships, it still has a • of state revenues are returned to the local ` direct impacts --fit funds anion that local government. Some people in Congress and in ' governments need -- schools, teacher retire - the - Administration - call • these actions ire went funds, medics' assistance. community responsible tax cats. They -are especially ir- ' mental health... What will happen if the ritated when the governors of the states that S state loses its GRS funds? The went nn local have enacted reforms and the mayors, con governments and local tizpaysra could be time to toms to Washington for financial' shows. the-National ervices would be cut; taxes help. - The Administration and some of my con-- would be increased. gressional colleagues often seem to forget 8o those who would' cut the state share one important point --the federal taxpayer is simply close their eyes to the reality of state -. the ssme guy who digs into his cr her pocket local fiscal relationships. Eliminating the to keep the states, counties and cities run - . teat share would directly affect local ring. There is only one pocket, and to the !governments: ... _ . _ _ person who keeps digging into it, it doesn't; In Tennessee, it would mean that the state much matter where the money is going. ! would not have the ability to fund local Cutbacks In revenue sharing, without a I schools at the current rate of 26 percent. corresponding federal tax cut. Inesns simply ! In • Oregon, it. would mean a reduction in that local government is forced to turn to ! the *1.6 billion of state aid to local govern- that same taxpayer and ask him to put his , manta to support mental health. drug abuse hand in his pocket one more time ... and prevention and other programs. today that pocket contains at beat borrowed In Connecticut. it would mean a reduction mousy. So you are being made inflation* cul- in the $670 million of state aid for local pro - prit by a president and a congress which grams of tax abatement, aid to the elderly, refuses to balance the budget, refuses to and aid to cities. index inflation out of its tax system, refuses, I could continue -this enumeration for each to reduce its own spending while. cutting state: . • all discretionary funds to you. Inflation has eroded 40 percent of the pur- • Opponents also refuse- to recognize that chasing power of the GRS dollar over the last we are entitled to revenue sharing funds. eight years. To have maintained the purchas- ' hs $8.9 billion allocated for revenue slier - ing of the $8.1 billion outlay for revenue lag la part of the unearned windfall the 1 sharing in TV 1974, the program would have federal government 1s taking through the! to provide s little more than *10 billion this inflationary income tax. The federal govern -1 fiscal yam. If the program is reauthorized at meat needs to do exactly what some of you • the constant dollar level of $8.9 billion, the have done —it needs to index inflation out , value of revenue sharing would drop some - oi the income tax structure. time In FY 1981 to half the real value of -the Despite no new taxes and a 1978 tax cut. program in FT 1974. And the decline of the the federal tax take has risen from-the last real Talus will contin s. year of the Ford Administration to Carter's I expect the President's new lower spend - flsoai 1981 projection by 106%—.front s300 ing figures to be well- received by the Con- . billion to $813 billion. grass. Congress is in a budget - cutting mood. In flscal 1981, the federal government will But we must trim the budget in • rational collect at least 433 billion. in undeserved tax manner. We must make wise decisions about revenues from individuals because of in- spending. not panic decisions based on the flation's impact. As long as the federal goe mood of the moment. And - WO must take ernment continues to collect its inflation steps toward long -range fiscal responsibility windfall, and thus makes it difficult for state at the federal level. and local governments to impoee additions' ' And. we mgt recognise where taxpayer taxes to meet state and local needs, the • and citizen confidence in government deci- sion..trmiting i the highest and where it • His job is to make sure the job gets done. the lowest. fn a recent "Miaaeeota Poll" pub- Working together, we can insure. that he .lisped in the Minneapolis Tribune 33. percent I pts it done a responsible 'way! of the .reepondents said they had most faith ' ..- Mr. h Tom L�'RGER. revenue • in state government. 39 percent in local gov ersment and only 19 percent in the federal sharing is not a bonanza for State and government. local governments. It is not money used When the queetlon was t'evsrsed• 49 per to make local politicians look good, it is cant- almost .hsif —of the people said they ° money necessary for vital programs. • bad. the least faith la the federal govern - Without. general revenue sharing, 'State many.. Only 21 percent • and 10 percent said and local governments would be forced they had the least faith in local and state government. respectively. to look elsewhere for funds. The reason that local. government ranks There is only one place to look: The ahead- of state is the property tax, and the taxpayer. And let me - remind my col - reason the property tax hurts 1s the drain on leagues that the Federal' taxpayer is the the taxpayers of federal income tax. same guy who digs into his or her pocket • The iatergovernentel system; . was se- • t0 keep the States; counties, and cities verely damaged in the 19501 and 1970's. bur- Tanning. There 3s • only one pocket to the ing those two decades. federal grant. pro- i person who keeps digging. in it. grams expanded.' finally reaching nearly Goo I Cutting the States share ' of general in number. The amount of federal money going to states and cities and other local revenue sharing and claiming it will not governments reached a high of 189 billion hurt the overall program is like removing last year. Federal funds now reprgsent 38 two wheels from a car and saying it can percent of local government revenues. still run because it has two more. At least The fact of federal funding fs not bad, 40 percent of the States' share of GRS but with the money came the obligations. funds is passed directly through by the and the centralization of power. in. Wash- States to counties and cities. ington. With every dollar came directions. Your priorities took the back seat to pro- Columnist William Raspberry provided grams that could be financed by federal a striking example of the disastrous e2- grants. No one designed this scheme—it facts of eliminating the States' share of just happened as the inflated federal income GRS. He quotes Grey Humphrey, direr- tax crowded local government out of the tor of legislation for the American Fed - taxpayers' pocketbook: - eration of Teachers, who says: Tour board on Saturday made some good Wisconsin and Montana use sU their rave recommendations on what features of block nue sharing funds for State equalisation- - sad estegoriesi grant programs should _ be to boost the- poorer school districts.. Ohio eliminated or delayed, uses 75 percent of its revenue sharing for Ironically, the 1970'a ushered in reforms education. Pennsylvania uses half: its revs- , under the heading of the New Federalism. nus. sharing for education of the handi- The ORS was the cornerstone of the new capped. - - - _ _ _ . _ _ order. But the New Federalism didn't breed 1 - Pi'eaident, that is On the tip Of d _ block gr and sxxande ORB. Instead Congress brad 150 new categorical pm6 • the iceberg. I ask unanimous consent that with new requirements, new administrate 1 Mr. Raspberry's column be printed in to- costs to you and the nation's taxpayers, day Rzcoan. • a new set of priorities. The activities of the There being no objection„ the article 70'a and the expansion of federal allocations , for grant programs make LBJ look like a 1 • was ordered to be •printed i the • RECORD. skinflint. When he left office: the total fed• ' as follows: • era' aid to states and cities eras & mere $20 : Now Wao Smarts roe 1l nuc&Tiox boon, The Ca , budget submitted is , When President-elect Jimmy Carter was • January ells for outlays of $9d.3 billion. ; touting his pmp Department: of Educe- In all _ taisn_ the President did limit the • lion, he said its purpose was to provide "a real growth of federal aid. But limiting ei= stronger voice for education at the federal penditures does not the problem. The level • problem is an archaic mosaic of 492 grant .Well. after a tough fight, President Carter - programs that have taken on a life of their and the National Education Association (the own. The system must be changed• s pend- chief supporter of the ides) have their new Let's. get oft the kick of stopping ing and.get on the theme of spending fly, department. But instead of the promised Let's get off the kick of having the federal "stronger voice," vieve got an* epidemic of • government. make all our decisions, and let's laryngitis. • ; will reduce fed - let private and corporate citizens and local $ The new budget proposals _ Process government joie the decision - tusking •*1.6 billion bloody And who is crying ur- I want to close With just a few more can- der? ments on the president's revised budget. A ± Not Jimmy Carter, who proposed some of balanced budget is absolutely vital this year.1 the cuts himself. Not Education Secretary not because It will be a quick fix or an imme- Shirley Hufstedler, who can't quite bring diets clue toianation, but because it sends herself to admit. that the damage has been • signal that the Administration and the done. Not the NEA. which takes the attitude Congress are serious about licking inflation. that Carter and his new cabinet agency have The President has given os a starting point. done about the best they could "in the pres- just as he has done three or four times in the ent environment." past. It's important to remember that his ' Most of the shrieks, the demands for res- budget is only a starting point. His job Isn't 1toration, are coming from people who to pay. "I'm right, you're wrong." His Job le doubted the usefulness of the department's to forge s consensus and to keep Congress' "stronger voice' 'in the first place, including feet to the fire on the economy. - . I NEA's rival American' Federation of Teachers. y • There is some question over the amount of a few well - placed screams might do the most damage the new budget-proposal does to ed-- good. uc►tioa. Hufstedier, for lastsaoe, looks at . DURENBERC ER. If we eliminate • the dollars specifically earmarked for her de- partment 'and claims that, far trom s d general revenue sharing with the States, ing, she has a modest increase. Not so much we are marking the end of programs for as to leave the department`whole in the face the elderly, health care and health edu- ot• double -digit inflation, of course, but not . cation programs, programs for the men- so bad, either. . tally and physically handicapped and The AFT figures in other budget cuts, other programs that I, for one, do not outside the new department. that directly want to see ended because they are .. affect education outlays and pronounces uniquely local—not Federal. disaster. Charter's first !lscsl year 1980 budget called . Time and again, we have heard that . for a cut of some •390' million in education th e fiscal 1981 budget grill be a contest funds. But a March revision took into so- between guns and butter defense count the fact that some 8768 minion would spending versus social spending. Mr. be needed to pay the rising interest cost of; President, if that is the case then I offer the Guaranteed student. Loan Program. in general revenue sharing as the first test. effect reducing education .funding by that: Those who say we cannot turn our backs • amount. The Carta budget also includes on social programs cannot turn their 8900 million for the new Youth Initiative• mk on g revenue sharing With Program —brut that money cannot be appro- the $tam. priated until the program•is enacted.. Mr. President, I support full reau- What.those who see only a modest cut fall' thorization of general revenue sharing. I to note is that the Carter budget also takes a, have made that clear in my introduction • huge hunk out of general revenue- sharingI money, well over s third of which was being' of 8. 2414. I am supporting the. amend - used by the states for education. Indeed, 131 meat now before ua because -I recognize states use all. their revenue - sharing money the absolute need for a balanced Fed - tor education. • . • oral budget. I agree with Tennessee Gov. "Take into acoount the direct and indirect; Lamar Alexander who told the Senate cuts to education and add' the effects of in-' Subcommittee on . Revenue Sharing in nation. and it looks like short rations," ob..- he would prefer a ?3 million cut serves Charles Lee. executive director of the March Washington- bases- Committee for Furl Fund- In categorical grants over a $43. million ing of Education Programs. cud, in general revenue sharing. for his Grey Humphrey, director of legislation for State. • the AFT, echoes the view. _ It has been estimated that categorical "The direct cuts to education programme ; grants return only 69 cents out of every bad enough, " he says. "but it's worse than + dollar in the form of services to the pub - that; Wisconsin and Montana use all their t . General revenue sharing returns 99 revenue - sharing funds for state equaliser tion --to boost the Inver school di cents out of each dollar. If our goal is to Ohio uses 73 percent of its revenue - sharing spend tax dollars wisely, there is little for education. Pennsylvania uses half its ref - question_ over the prudent course. enue- sharing for • education of the handl- Most budget reductions are painful. capped." Humphrey points to the District of Colum- However, the Sassebaumf amendment bra as an illustration of what the new budget will not affect payments to individuals. • cuts mean. Block grants and general purpose fiscal Th city will lose x,000 in vocational assistance grants, such as the commu- education money in each of the next two nity development block' grants, are not Years; 897,000 in guidance and testing money; affected. Programs which the Budget 891.000 in school lunches; 84.3 million in im- Committee has already recommended be pact and (mostly for youngsters from public trimmed will not be further - cut by this housing) ; and 8930,000 in Basic . Education amendment. Opportunity. Grants (BEOGs) . • The Kassebaum amendment merely Nationally, says Humphrey,. the budget reduces' spending for the remaining calls. for 83 billion in cuts that affect educe:- categorical programs in all functional tidnsi ptograms and 81.4, billion. in • new out- lays for a net cut of $1.6 billion. areas by 10 percent. 'The cuts may sting, Terry Herndon, executive director of the but they will not kill. This approach will NEA, says his organization "would have pre- allow States to maintain their flexibility. ferred a more liberal proposal" from the i And, it will assure the continuation of President but accepts the "pragmatic •recog- i those programs that are most important ninon that this is the best that is possible Ito the public that is served by all gov- given the environment Carter faces on Cap- ; itol Hill." ernMeIIts. • • But then E ward . eradon is in a rather awkward And I am grateful t to Senator from situation. The new Education Dep Kansas and the Senator from New Jer- was Carter's fulfillment of a promise he made So for this leadership on this issue. to.the NEA, and it won him NEA endorsement for re- election. Having cut the deal, the NEA can't bring itself to criticize Carter for the present budget disaster. Nor, of course,. can Hufsted- ler, who; after all, is the newest member of the Carter team. ' As a result, that "stronger voice for educa- tion" has been muted to s whisper just when