Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
November 18, 1980
• TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ.SPECIAL SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 18, 1980 Mayor Harbeck presiding. 1] Roll Call at 7:30 P.M. 2] ''Approval of the Minutes of September 10, 1980 3] Communications: a] City of Prior Lake b] Association of Metropolitan Municipalities c] Minnesota Building Movers Association 4] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers: a] Cncl.Colligan from the Fire Dep't.; Jt. Seven Man Committee; and The Planning Commission b] Cncl.Hullander from Scott County Criminal Justice Advisory Comm. c] Cncl.Lebens from the Community Services Board d] Cncl.Leroux from the Shakopee School Board e] Cncl.Reinke from the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission f] Mayor Harbeck from Scott County Board of Commissioners 5] RECOGNITION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANYONE PRESENT IN THE AUDIENCE WHO DESIRES TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA 6] Old Business: a] Prairie Street - 3rd to 4th - Vacation or Street Construction b] Authorization to proceed with Capital Improvement Program - tabled 11/5/80 c] Res. No. 1739, Amending Resolution No. 1547, 1980 Pay Plan and Appointing A City Administrator - tabled 11/5/80 7] Planning Commission Recommendations: a] Preliminary Plat of Minnesota Valley 5th Addition, an 18 acre parcel lying at 12th Avenue and East of Kmart Retail Store Developer: Dick Wiggin, Route 3, Shakopee Action: Approval/Dental Planning Comm. Recommendation: Denial b] Preliminary Plat of Superior Supply 1st Add'n. a 20 acre parcel located West of TH 101, East of CR89 and So. of RR Developer: Superior Supply Corp., c/o Hart Kuller, 2380 American Nat'l. Bank Bldg., St. Paul 55101 - Action: Approval /Denial Planning Comm. Recommendation: Approval w /conditions c] Preliminary Plat of Howe 1st Add'n.,:a 20 acre parcel lying So. of TH 101 and No. of Railroad and West of North Star Auto Auctior Developer: Howe, Inc., 4821 Xerxes Avenue No., Mpls. 55430 Action: Approval /Denial Planning Comm. Recommendation: Approval w /conditions 8] Routine Resolutions and Ordinances: a] Res. No. 1746, Amending Holmes St. Assessment Roll 9] New Business: a] 8:15 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Vacation of Drainage Easement Within The Plat of Ziegler Addition b] 8:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Proposed assessments for the 79 -2 Fourth Avenue Watermain Project - along Dakota Street from 4th Avenue South to the RR tracks c] Res. No. 1 P4 A Res. Adopting Assessments 79 -2 Fourth Avenue TENTATIVE AGENDA November. 18, 1980 Page -2- d] CR -21 Plans - presentation by Ery Prenevost, County Engr. e] Kmart Conveyor System - Information only f] Res. No. 1743, Authorizing Shade Tree Grant Application for 1981 g]. Authorize payment of the bills h] Discussion on Fire Service Agreements i] Industrial Revenue Bond Issues j] Res. No. 1736, Accepting Work on 4th Avenue Watermain & 4th and Mn. Revitalization Project (79 -2) k] City Engineer's status report on public improvements 1] Res. No. 1747,Amending Resolution No. 1663 Approving the Final Plat of Minnesota Valley Fourth Addition 10] Consent Business: 11] Other Business: a] b] c] d] . • 12] Adjourn. Thomas G. Brownell Acting City Administrator 0 TENTATIVE AGENDA SHAKOPEE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Special Session November 18, 1980 Chairman Hullander presiding 1. Roll call at 7:00 PM 2. Accept special meeting call 3. Approval of minutes of October 14, 1980 4. Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project a. Discussion with Gary and Sharon Goodwin on construction of fourth duplex on Lots 1 and 2, Block 3 Macey Second Addition b. Closings Under the 235 Homeownership Program 5. Elderly Highrise a. Update on Elderly Highrise, Community Room and Pedestrian Crossing b. Discussion of Parking Spaces for Elderly Highrise 6. Authorization of Payment of the Bills 7. Other Business 8. Adjournment Jeanne Andre Executive Director ,v, CITY OF SHAKOPEE INCORPORATED 1970 ` j t 129 E. First Ave. - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445 -3650 1din, I I i A. T * ASK . November 14, 1980 Housing & Redevelopment Authority City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Special Meeting Dear Commissioners: You are hereby notified that there will be a Special Meeting of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority at 7:00 P.M., on Tuesday, November 18, 1980, in the Chambers at City Hall. The purpose of this meeting is to conduct a regular business meeting per agenda attached. If you are unable to attend at this time, please let Jeanne Andre, the H.R.A. Director, know. Sincerely, dad Dick Hullander Chairman Shakopee H.R.A. DH /jms enclosure 1 7 -.1" �, 17 c Hear t of ! )' (7 t )' t ti s C7 An Equal Opportunity Employer PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Adj. Reg. Session Shakopee, Minnesota October 14, 1980 Chrmn. Hullander called the meeting to order at 7:10 P.M. with Comm. Leroux, Lebens, Colligan and Reinke present. Also present: City Admin., Douglas S. Reeder; HRA Director, Jeanne Andre; City Eng., H. R. Spurrier and City Attorney, Julius A. Coller, II. HRA Director reported on the freeze of funds for federal 235 mortgage financing. She stated a letter has been sent to the proper officials asking for the continuation and /or explanation of why the project was being canceled. Discussion was then held on whether or not the City would be liable for any increase in prices that a contractor might incur due to the delays in the 4th and Minnesota Project due to the federal freeze in funding. Chrmn. Hullander stated that Goodwin Builders is asking for a memo stating the City's intent on the 4th and Minnesota Project. Discussion was held on the amount proposed for the 1981 budget for professional services, as well as discussion on the 1981 salaries budget. Colligan /Reinke offered Resolution No. 80 -22, A Resolution Adopting A Tentative General Fund Budget For 1980, and moved for its adoption. City Admin. read the resolution. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux /Lebens moved to authorize payment in the amount of $249.03 to Von Klug & Assoc., for August relocation services for the 4th and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project. Roll Call: Ayes - unanimous Noes - none Motion carried HRA Director reported on the Bonus Funds Application and Future Community Development Block Grant Applications. She stated that Shakopee's application had been rejected. Leroux /Lebens moved to accept the offer of Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. dated September 24, 1980 in the amount not to exceed $1,000 for a proposal on a pedestrian crossing of T.H. ' 169 in the area of the Elderly Highrise. Roll Call: Ayes - unanimous Noes - none Motion carried HRA Director reported on a Change Order proposal by Joe Miller on the single family dwelling he has contracted to build in the 4th and Minnesota Broject on Lot 1, Block 1, Macey Second Addition. • Proceedings of the October 14, 1980 Shakopee HRA Page Two Colligan /Hullander moved to accept Change Order No. 1 to reduce founda- tion size to 23' x 36', retaining second floor at same size with can- tilever, for the proposed single family dwelling to be built by Joe Miller Development, Inc. on Lot 1, Block 1, Macey Second Addition for the 4th and Minnesota Project. Roll Cal*: Ayes - Reinke, Hullander, Colligan Noes - Lebens, Leroux Motion carried Discussion was then held on the single family dwelling being built by Simon Hafner on Lot 2, Block 2, Macey Second Addition for the 4th and Minnesota Project and their budget for floor covering. Chrmn. Hullander reported on receiving a phone call from the Goodwin Builders regarding problems which have arisen in the 4th and Minnesota Project. Discussion was held on each problem: 1) Goodwin indicated a grade plan change causing additional costs to be incurred for concrete blocks for footings. 2) Backfill - It was stated by the HRA Director that the backfill had been delayed but she felt Goodwin Builders were now in receipt of what they needed, although Goodwin had expressed concern of incurring additional costs due to the City's slow delivery of the backfill. 3) Sewer and water lines - Discussion was held on easements which would be needed for the sewer and water lines which had not been installed on the lot lines of the properties which are being built on by Goodwin Builders. 4) Underground electrical services - It was agreed that electrical service to two joined units can be placed in the same underground trench. Colligan /Leroux moved that the HRA pay the difference from the overhead cost to put in the underground wiring on Lots 5 -10, Block 2 and Lots 1- 2,'Block 3 of Macey's Second Addition upon receipt of acceptable documentation of said costs and that in the future on all other projects it is the responsibility of the contractor to provide underground electrical service in the proposal submitted to the HRA. Roll Call: Ayes - unanimous Noes - none Motion carried 5) Building Permit fees - It is the intent of the HRA to pay or pass on to the buyer the building permit fee paid by Goodwin in excess of that originally provided in his contract. 6) Delays on Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Macey's Second Addition - The builders would like a 2 percent increase for price delays. 7) Goodwin has ordered eight meters for eight units, at a special rate. Now there is a possibility that only six units will be built and Goodwin will be charged $150 for each meter even if it is not used. Proceedings'of the October 14, 1980 Shakopee HRA Page Three The HRA instructed the HRA Director to write a letter to Goodwin Builders stating the discussion and recommendations from the meeting. Colligan /Lebens moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8:38 P.M. Jeanne Andre Executive HRA Director Jane Wostrel Recording Secretary 4b MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director RE: Closings Under the 235 Homeownership Program, Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project DATE: November 14, 1980 The closings for the duplex built on Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, are scheduled for November 19, 1980. The house has been completed and is available for inspection by interested HRA Commissioners. The HRA will deed the property to Joseph M. Miller Development Company, Inc., who will in turn deed the property to Jay and Julie Hauer and Roxanne Gallagher. The HRA must adopt the following motions to clear the way for the closings: 1. Authorize appropriate HRA officials to make, execute and deliver deed to Lot 3, Block 2, Macey Second Addition to Joseph M. Miller Development, Inc. in accordance with contract for deed between Joseph M. Miller Development, Inc. and the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority, for the purpose of conveying said property to authorized buyer identified by the HRA. 2. Authorize appropriate HRA officials to make, execute and deliver deed to Lot 4, Block 2, Macey Second Addition to Joseph M. Miller Development, Inc. in accordance with contract for deed between Joseph M. Miller Development, Inc. and the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority, for the purpose of conveying said property to authorized buyer identified by the HRA. JA /jms • 5 ' �� MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director RE: Update on Elderly Highrise, Community Room and Pedestrian Crossing DATE: November 13, 1980 The highrise has been cleared for occupancy and 32 persons have already moved in. Fourteen more people are scheduled to move in by December 1st, and once applicants still in process are finally reviewed, the building will probably be filled. The Community Room is still scheduled for completion by December 1, 1980. Hopefully we will be able to schedule an open house by December 15th. Mayor Harbeck met with Minnesota Department of Transporta- tion Commissioner Braun on Wednesday, November 12, 1980. The Commissioner indicated that the City should be able to provide a controlled crosswalk at the intersection of First Avenue and Atwood without warrents if the City is willing to bear the cost of the construction. He plans to check this option with his staff, and indicated we could contact MDOT for an update of the issue on Tuesday, November 18, 1980. JA /jms 5 .b • MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director RE: Parking Spaces for Elderly Highrise DATE: November 14, 1980 In December of 1979 City officials met with John Bergstad and staff members of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency to discuss final details of the building proposed at 200 Levee Drive. One item of discussion was the provision of parking for the residents of the building and visitors to the Community Room to be leased by the City. There are approximately 21 spaces provided in the lot at the East side of the building. The City Administrator indicated that the City would be willing to provide parking stickers for residents to park in the munci- pal lot across Fuller Street. However in exchange he wanted some parking spaces to be reserved for visitors to the Community Room, particularly those with mobility limitations. None of this discussion was recorded, and no specific numbers were suggested for resident parking spaces in the municipal lot: or visitor parking spaces in the building lot. If we wish to finalize such an arrangement prior to the time the Community Room is opened, the HRA and City officials should decide what is the most appropriate arrangement. The two basic questions are as follows: 1. Should the City request certain parking spaces in building parking lot to be reserved for visitors to the Community Room. 2. Should the City provide parking spaces in the municipal lot for building residents, either in exchange for building parking spaces, or for any reason. JA /jms • • MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director RE: Authorization of Payment of the Bills DATE: November 14, 1980 I recommend the payment of the following bills: Van Klug and Associates, $30.00, for September professional services for relocation, elderly highrise tax increment district. Tom Siebenaler Sodding and Excavating, $135.00, for sod for houses at 467 -69 Minnesota Street. Scott County Recorder, $1.40, for xerox copies of Macey Second Addition Covenants. • JA /jms • � Ir. • -3 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE VA MICHAEL A. McGUIRE, MANAGER ECEIVED November 5, 1980 NOV 6 1980 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Metropolitan Council Suite 300, Metro Square Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Attention: Mr. John Rutford Dear Mr. Rutford: The Prior Lake City Council reviewed the proposed Cable Service Territory of the City of Shakopee during its regularly scheduled Council meeting on November 3, 1980. As we understand it, Shakopee is incorporating a service area that is consistant with its own municipal boundary and to that we have no objection. However, the City of Prior Lake has just recently established its own Cable Service Committee to assess the need for Cable T.V. within Prior Lake. Because we are in the initial stage of review, the City Council has expressed participating with Shakopee,and possibly Savage at a later date, in a form of a joint powers agreement to maximize the benefits of Cable Communications for all these communities. Beyond this request, the City of Prior Lake has no objections to the Shakopee proposal. If you have any comments, please direct them to my attention. r Sincerely, 7 ‘4e(9,:;1„,,E9L-Le • Michael A. McGuire City Manager City of Prior Lake MAM /caw t cWalt Harbeck, Mayor of'Shakopee Rod Hopp, Mayor of Savage (612) 447 -4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 • :11F A 1r NOV 51980 De w 0 cr • association of metropolitan municipalities • November 3, 1980 TO: MEMBER MUNICIPALITIES (Chief Administrative Officials and Delegates) FROM: VERN PETERSON, Executive Director There are two items I would like to bring to your attention:. • 1. Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) Vacancy • There is one opening on the TAB to replace the late Mr. Cam Anderson, Roseville Councilmember, who passed away recently. The person selected will serve the balance of the two -year term which expires October 31, 1982.,, „The individual must be a city elected official and must be willing to also serve as a member of the AMM's Transportation Policy Committee. The TAB normally meets the third Wednesday afternoon of each month in the Metropolitan Council Chambers. The TAB provides general transportation advice and counsel to the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Transit Commission, and MNDOT, and one of its most important functions is to annually determine the priorities for FAU project funding • for the seven- county metropolitan area. • 2. Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Vacancies (six) This committee consists of professional staff members (City. Engineers, Public Works Directors, Planning Directors, Community Development Directors, etc.), and its major function is to provide technical assistance, advice, and 'recommendations to the TAB. The persons recommended should be at the department head level. The AMM is allocated six suburban members on TAC and the terms are for two -years beginning January, 1981, and ending December of 1982. The individuals selected must be also willing to serve on the AMM Transportation Policy Committee. • (over) 300 hanover bldg. 480 cedar street, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 222 -2861 THE AMM BOARD IS SOLICITING RECOMMENDATIONS /VOLUNTEERS. FOR THESE • POSITIONS VIA THIS BULLETIN. YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS SHOULD BE IN . WRITING AND SHOULD BE SENT TO THE AMM OFFICE, ATTENTION OF VERN PETERSON, BY NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 1, 1980. IN FILLING THESE POSITIONS, THE BOARD WILL ATTEMPT TO MAINTAIN THE GEOGRAPHICAL . POPULATION SIZE AND OTHER BALANCES WHICH CURRENTLY EXIST. PLEASE CONTACT VERN PETERSON AT 222 -2861 SHOULD YOU HAVE QUESTIONS. • • cc: Current AMM TAC Members Board of Directors • • • • • • • • Honorable Shakopee Council NOV 1 4831 Ridge Road C Gentlemen: Mt ka , Mn, 553 Nov 3, 180. I am writing in behalf of the Minnesota Building Movers Association concerning the proposed T. V. Cable franchise that has been under consideration by the cities at the present time. Our industry is constantly being frustrated by the addition of signals, overhead crosswalks, bridges, overhead signing and freeways obstructing the few routes we have left to get about in the cities. For many years we have looked forward, with great anticipation, to the day when all utility wires would be placed underground. These wires have been an eye sore from an esthetic point of view, as well as an enormous obstruction in the movement of large loads about in the cities. We understand the T.V. franchise people are now planning to put their wires overhead on poles already loaded with power and telephone cables, adding additional difficulty and expense to all truckers hauling large or bu]ky loads under these wires. A lot of construction is built in factories now and hauled in large sections by truck to sites. Houses and commercial buildings are being saved and relocated. What the people in the trucking industry feel is necessary is 214 feet of height clearance over the streets and highways to make this trucking practical. • The power and telephone companies have gone through an enormous amount of planning and expense to go underground and we feel putting T.V. cables above ground'is purely short term and profit motivated for installers, but a step in the wrong direction for the city. Please do keep us informed as the matter progresses and ti you for any consideration' you may be able to give us when considering this type of installation in your area. Yours very truly, - -1 'net.. ' . Ernst President MINNESOTA BUILDING MOVERS ASSOCIATION KRE /aaw MEMO TO: Thomas G. Brownell, Acting City Administrator . FROM: Judith S. Cox, Deputy City Clerk RE: Appointing A City Administrator DATE: November 14, 1980 I have received an executed contract from Mr. John K. Anderson with the City of Shakopee, a copy of which was received by the Council - members from Mr. Rod Krass, Ass't. City Attorney. It would be appropriate at this time to appoint Mr. Anderson to the position of City Administrator effective December 1, 1980, per mutual agreement between Mr. Anderson and the City Council. Action: 1] Remove Resolution No. 1739 from the table (A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 1547, 1980 Pay Plan, and Appointing A City Administrator. 2] Amend the resolution to include Item 4. Authorizing and directing the proper City officials to execute a contract with Mr. Anderson, for the position of City Administrator. 3] Adopt the Resolution No. 1739, as amended. jc • ' e.., ti.. «- .w .......... ...w,. -, ,, t....,. , e. •....+- hm. -„w,. .rte... ,. «.- . »..... •.. ......a. t....+,... - ... .... ,... l -' �.... .. -.. .... +... ,. +.».. any vn....f .:;: u'^.*...•^",^` vn�V+ n--. n....• :m- "+- '- -r+.......t..- ..�r«y.., ...........,.......r..... ....._.. «... »,.. ....... ,. ...._«..._.... .�_ _ ,.. - +t^' - _. _ .. .. ' t RESOLUTION NO. 1739 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 1547, 1980 PAY PLAN, AND APPOINTING A CITY ADMINISTRATOR WHEREAS, there now exists a vacancy in the position of City Administrator, and WHEREAS, the City Council authorized the filling of the position effective December 1, 1980. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, that 1. Resolution No. 1547 be amended to read, that the salary of the City Administrator, effective December 1, 1980 shall be in the sum and amount of $31,000.00 per year and payable bi- week.ly plus $200.00 per month car allowance. 2. The salary of the City Administrator for the calendar year 1981 shall also be in the sum and amount of $31,000.00 per year payable bi- weekly plus $200.00 per month car allowance. 3. John K. Anderson be and hereby is appointed City Adminis- li trator, effective December 1, 1980. . ,-- �. --, Adopted in special session of the City Council of the City fi. of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 5th day of November, 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Acting City Administrator Approved as to form this day of , 1980. _/ City Attorney Y 4. The proper City officials are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract with Mr. Anderson for the position of City Administrator. 1 ' t 7a. DATE: November 13, 1980 CASE: PC 80 -46P ITEM: Preliminary Plat, Minnesota Valley 5th, 6th & 7th Additions APPLICANT: Dick Wiggin LOCATION: 12th Avenue tnd Polk Street ZONING /LAND USE: R -4, Multi- family residential /Vacant AREA: 18.92 acres APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 11.28, Section 12 PUBLI HEARING: November 13, 1980 CASE HEARD BY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CASE HEARD ON: November 18, 1980 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval of an 18.92 acre subdivision of 27 four - family residential lots. The developer plans to proceed with the final plat of this property in three stages with Minnesota Valley 5th (Blocks 1 and 2 at top) to be final platted first. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY: Surrounding Land Uses: North - Proposed Polk Street South - Proposed bypass right -of -way East - R -4, Residential, Minnesota Valley 3rd & 4th Additions West - B -1, Highway Business, Shopping Center Urban Services Availability: Sanitary sewer - existing 10" pipe in 12th Avenue Court Water - Existing 12" watermain in 12th Avenue Court Storm sewer - existing 42" pipe in north end of 12th Avenue • Court Flood Plain: Lowest elevation above 100 year flood stage. CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The present site is vacant and gently rolling with natural drainage toward 12th Avenue Court. The proposed storm sewer does not conform to City of Shakopee design criteria, since the pipe utilized is smaller than those permitted. The existing drainage system is constructed for a minor occurance. The major occurance should be analyzed to determine whether local flooding might occur. • Case No. PC 80 -46P November 13, 1980 Minnesota Valley 5th, 6th & 7th Page -2- 2. The proposed plat shows two cul -de -sacs with nine lots fronting on each (36 units each) with the rest of the lots fronting on 12th Avenue Court. 3. The plat includes part of a parcel north of 12th Avenue which would have proposed Polk Street right -of -way. Polk Street is proposed for construction during the summer of 1981. It is appropriate that the property owner dedicate the entire right -of -way of Polk Street from 12th Avenue to 10th Avenue as part of this plat. 4. Twelfth Avenue Court, as proposed, is a 1150 foot deadend street from the entrance of Kmart to the end of Fillmore Circle. This is quite in excess of the 500 foot City standard for the length of deadend streets. This is of additional concern because of the densities that will be loading onto this deadend street. Staff has discussed this matter with the developer and would recommend that the developer and City jointly pursue the installation of an exit ramp "F" through what is shown as an outlot in the southwest corner of the proposed plat that would connect to 12th Avenue and serve as a southerly entrance to Valley Mall. Any such plans would be subject to approval by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Taylor Circle and Fillmore Circle should be built to urban residential street standards; 12th Avenue Court should be built to commercial collector street standards, if a connection is made to ramp "F ", otherwise 12th Avenue Court should be constructed to urban commercial street standards. The streets in the proposed plat are all urban design and require curb and gutter. A walkway is required to the park area, together with walkway easements. A sidewalk is required along 12th Avenue Court, and is recommended for Taylor Circle and Fillmore Circle since the district is a multi- family area. 6. The proposed watermain has an insufficient number of fire hydrants required for a plat of this density. 7. The proposed sanitary sewer is in apparent conformance with the City of Shakopee design criteria. The developer must submit drawings of the proposed utility to the City Engineer. 8. In review of this plat, the Director of Parks and Recreation has indicated that the park, as proposed, is too small of an area. As is, the park meets the classifications of a "totlot "and the City conditionally has not been interested in including these in the park system. The west end of Shakopee is in need of a neighborhood park ideally on the order of four to five acres. The Director of Parks and Recreation further indicated that a two acre park would be the minimum viable park area to serve the immediate needs of the people in this area. The. upper valley linear trail connecting the Junior High School., Senior High School, Tahpah Park and the Minnesota Valley Mall is not addressed. As proposed, the trail would link the regional trail from the abandoned Milwaukee Roadline and a westerly direction, roughly following the east /west drainage way across the City south of Lions Park, north of Tahpah Park, connecting with 13th Avenue. The length Case No. PC 80 -46P November 13, 1980 Mn. Valley 5th, 6th & 7th Page -3- 7 from the west end of Tahpal7 Park at 13th Avenue to the Minnesota Valley Mall, an easement for this purpose should be addressed in the plat. City staff has explored the feasibility of increasing the park area to roughly two acres while still allowing a similar configuration to that proposed by the developer. Please note the attachment. City staff's recommendation includes realignment of the southerly cul -de -sac to the south so that the lots incorporate the outlot area that was proposed on the southern edge of this plat. The result is a park ara of approximately 1.7 acres with dimensions on the order of 285' x 270'. A park of this size can allow a much wider range of recreational activities which could include play- ground equipment, make -shift ball field and a small picnic area with general open space. This size park would very nearly meet the 10 percent park dedication requirement of the City. The proposed park would be linked to the north and south cul -de -sacs with a 20' pedestrian way, either which could serve as an access road for the maintenance of the park. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the request for Preliminary Plat approval be tabled at this time pending the submission of a revised preliminary plat that: 1. Answers either the question of the excessive deadend cul -de -sac or has approval from MN /DOT for a connection to ramp "F ". 2. Incorporates right -of -way dedication for the Polk Street extension to the north. 3. Incorporates a proposed park area on the order of that recommended by staff, that meets the park dedication requirement for the area and is connected with the rest of the plat with pedestrian trails, as proposed. 4. Addresses pedestrian right -of -way or easement for purposes of connecting the upper valley linear trail and the Minnesota Mall shopping area. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Recommend to the City Council denial of Minnesota Valley 5th, 6th and 7th Additions (Preliminary Plat). • TK / j iw Attachment .j L _ t } i tr.. \ J IY IV ri tj- de air �7 �o + i f J ti r � ,_ �v, ,f-,�. ! � � ,5•� � `�v �F� Imo. � }�� � :� L •:' H a a �� i �� r 'r l� u as \ �,y -- -- i z t n j _ --- _ a U .�, opt too �. Il ) , �f j L K C` t ry I .a °r at8.o? 5 r✓ r H/r.�'r '`• ! c; 1' � - r ' , J a i ATE: November 13, 1980 ASE: PC 80 -36P ITEM: Preliminary Plat - Superior Supply 1st Addition APPLICANT: Superior Supply, Inc. LOCATION: C.R. 89 and TH 101 ZONING /LAND USE: I -1, Light Industrial /Vacant AREA: 19.5 Acres APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 11.32; Chapter 12 Subdivision Regulations PUBLIC HEARING CASE HEARD BY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CASE HEARD ON November 18, 1980 PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval of a 19.5 acre plat at the above location. The plat consists of one 19.5 acre lot. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY: Surrounding land uses: North - B -1, Highway Business South - I -1, Light Industrial /Proposed By -pas East - T.H. 101 and Sewage /Vacant West - I -1, Light Industrial /Vacant Land use plan:' Industrial Flood plain: The site is above the 100 year flood plain. URBAN SERVICES AVAILABILITY: Sanitary Sewer: Not available, served by on -site system. Water: Not, available, served by on -site well. Storm Sewer: Not available, on -site retention. CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The proposed plat is in the I -1, light industrial zone. The plat is 1/2 acre short of the 20 acre minimum lot size for the I -1 zone. Staff recommends that, if approved, this plat be granted a 1/2 acre lot area variance due to the large area ( >20 acres) that is being set aside for the Shakopee by -pass right -of -way. 7 Case No. PC 80 -36P November 13, 1980 Superior Supply, Inc. Page -2- 2. The plat is bounded on the south by the proposed Shakopee by -pass right -of -way. The State Department of Transportation has reviewed these plans and offer the following comments: - Although the right -of -way is clearly defined, Mn /DOT is not relinquishing property claims or rights on the future right -of -way. - Future access to the site will be limited to C.R. 89 and any future street must be compatible with a TH 101 interchange. - Final drainage and grading plans are to be reviewed by a Mn /DOT hydraulics engineer. 3. The County Engineer made similar comments concerning access restricted to C.R. 89 and that all access to C.R. 89 will require a permit from his office. The County has the necessary right -of -way for C.R. 89. This subdivision requires no roadway construction other than driveway entrances. 4. An on -site system is proposed for this subdivision. The applicant has supplied the City with soil classification information. Staff requests a soils boring report (minimum of 3 borings) and septic system design prior to final plat approval. 5. A watermain is proposed to serve this area running east along TH 101, south between lots 1 and 2 of Halls Addition, across the railroad tracks and west along the tracks to C.R. 89. The City Council has accepted a feasibility study for this watermain. 6. The drainage plan proposes a detention facility to reduce the peak runoff rate. This design has been submitted to the City Engineer. Approval is pending the submission of a report specifying the capacity of the detention area. Easements must be provided from the detention area along the proposed ditch to the natural drainage along the northerly line of the plat. Additionally, 20' utility easements must be submitted along the exterior property lines. This is in addition to the existing NSP easement. 7. Any plans for exterior - storage will require approval of a conditional use permit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends preliminary plat approval conditioned on: 1. Submission and approval by the City Engineer of soil borings report and septic system design. Case No. PC 80 -36P November 13, 1980 Superior Supply, Inc. Page -3- 2. Provision of easements for drainage along drainage ways • and 20' utility easement along the exterior property lines (in addition to NSP easement). 3. Developer enter a postponed construction agreement with the City stating: "If the property owner alters the coverage of more than 124,000 sq. feet that he agree to construct facilities required to insure runoff not to exceed the present rate." PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Recommend approval to the City Council of the Preliminary Plat of Superior Supply 1st Addition subject to the following conditions: 1) Submission and approval by the City Engineer of soil borings report and septic system design. 2) Provision of easements for drainage along drainage ways and 20' utility easement along the exterior property lines (in addition to NSP easement). 3) Developer execute a drainage agreement with the City prior to final plat approval. u) That the plat be approved with a z acre lot variance. TK /jms O v f; 4J W N 0i NN r v7 W 'Z/ 7H5 �O y/r 3N 3H1 d0 3N/7 '3 1 N F O. O ^ I 0 N 1 U O a) co W j W ry rV a c m m •^ 1, r1 0, .L J-1 1-1 a) N m b O b0 N 1-I N a0 ,.J +•J u v �+ 0 G +-) r- a) CO G 44 G co a 0 m o + 00 b o J ° O O r :D .� T) -11 Ca O w O b «1 •ri z 4..1 •1-1 G H q r-1 0 �= p Q D \ O G � ar a) m r G • cd _H cn G -4 cd a) bJ w W tzam3 ri co O ir) OO a C 00 O -t U) a O ^ S Q) -H -H N U 3.1 G G W Z W W I� (0 c Ln -rGi i-. w .0L' 1- 4J N � 00 U >>N )U•1 C4 -W a) cn r4 N m = J F, + o ro u O O 11 N a m G Q) y J N 0 n CO y an d ri [ c o r +% Q O G a) <n w N co ca U O Y CD c a G G o N I-+ cn cw 00 w c4 O . 4 .0 v ::I cn •b ..c v •H W N UP:l H O ro H m m v G o cc (1) O a) m CU >4 'o co G 1 O •ri 1_ m a) c o w �• a) •^w U a) o (1) on m a)Q 1 p (V U 1 J I O vD m U F+ (1) ti b I / _ { m m r~ U) '0 G m O cd 0 G 4-1 a) o 4J 0O c )-I 'c) G +1 4.j 00 z ai W •H ro •r1 O ro S 4 Li a) u-) 4J ro m a) � 1..1 N 4J 6010 ^ O O A 4 a) G H > O a •r1 a ro ^ U 00 O 1.1 row O 'b 1.1 (3) 0 o y.J U o •^ ,� 1 7 a•4 G G m ro x O s4 0O G � G m w cn u O 'b cd m a) U) .0 O G'? in•rl Cd •H a) Q ^ }.a 11 a 00 G cd •H •ri cY) r` Cf) CT z ..0 a) m (1) z c c u z Q > m w m •• m c G r i .0 w v m �O 00 o m )_I 3 a) a) ( _ �) M pG •r1 1,6 j_I •rl O a (1) 4-1 •ri H m O 'U • w ^ a H G ,r� U w -0 C41 �4 ^ 'b G r-1 T) b w �4 u m _H z G cr'1 O N L U t_ -1 O m -It G co J �4 }.J a) r i G :� O G G ro u G G u ro v ^ O u N aG) " a te p m a) rn 0 O ). O ro U O a Ca H N ¢ r i a) .n U }, -r., cd ro O U ro m G m a) w u W O O td a) o O � U p x a i 4 + a 00 1J U O a) 4.J 1i7 m N G m w G 00 z 4J z (1) U U y-1 >, r, (3) O O cn !4 U O (1) ^ y.J (3) •H O ca G G G U O •^M y J. 3 a O 00 • >, i✓ G ri 0n cd •r1 U r= 1J m >a r-1 O 41 ro a) •^ 0n G n) m G 41 Cl) G i) O \ Cn 11 0 O 't •H 4-1 •H 1-1 01 S-, :� m •ri 00 1n () m W U 4-1 G,' •r.i ,.c •ri a) LO U N Cn > U r-i � m W ro r--1 m 1-1 m 0 "d a) >, u •ri G a) •ri � +.1 Nrz N w O / S+ H .0 G m m W 1i7 R1 m G TJ ^ a) U G O w O U x 0 cd m (I ro 3 a) cd cr'1 C w G ^ •^ to to _. W H Q 3 to .t i " 11 z r-i 4-1 •ri r-1 4.1 m -t O a1 )-I r1, O ^-C ^r w o m r-i O 4-1 O (1) (1) o u O r-i 11 G +_1 O G •ri 44.1 •^O G ro a) y-1 m • G w 4J a) ,-i m O m 'C I -H 'v m a N O G-I w G a) 00 CO I U Cl Eg co O 0 b4 rC a) •u •ri r-i O G a �C y.J >, ro m w 3 U W O y cd w x It - o -H a.1 N m cd i o ca G �4 m O M In m G 't a) 4-1 O r~ 00 •1-1 3 11 oC 0 •H y m m m cn •r) N 4-1 m O U M a) w 1i7 I ro 11 cd 'i7 r- '>7 >4 m "C7 � •ri w G O w r- p cd G cn G v m (1) G O +-1 O a) ^r-i cd O p > c1 3 'v 0 o U >, a3 3 O H u .c O rn r-i 1v 1 V p 0 U m u G r-I w u a) a) 4J 00 m 04 U ^ y..1 I W W N b TJ ro .n a) W a) N )-1 >4 m a) ^ U) U row () G +-1 � ••� d G G 4,1 •r-i m 11 m .9__ (1) W 1c7 m N G •^ u o a) C cd m W I Q N ro O )1 G 4J u U G 4 w cd b •r1 Sa 4.J En CO •H V Z '� m U cn G m L1 O C1, o u v ,c v 0o c m w I N _ �- 00 a) m 0 •r1 to •^ a) U N G m 10 U U a) O •H 0 G G a) s •u 3 N O 34 •ri 'H G 10 M d m 0 I N �� w ri G d m m ro a � m m •ri a) "0 � a) CO Q� 0 N _ /''► d .H a) r1 a) o U a) y-1 y..1 U c y.J 7' a) CO G 1 , I / z I 1..- 1_- W r,, •z' 0 -W M y.1 )-4 : rc 1.0 y-1 U )-1 CZ m 4J m n U O y-1 v� 1 J > Q O t1 O O rl O 4-1 M O U d a) H G ^ u U CL �4 G cn 'i1 w 'r .c v y_J a) 0 i n W w m •r1 0 H Ca O m ri O'N O •.J G m m z I � n cn ro m a1 3 a) I✓ u a~ C4 v cn a) � 4-4 1-1 a) ca � y.1 cd n 4-1 O G ,-i O 4.J ,.D m O W _Z1, iU') P� �4 N z r 1 r 7 G N a r- cd 1J a) G 00 m G G ^z •^ r i cr) •, ;,•�. I W 0 4-J H m H N a) M C u G C-4 H cd O O •ri U m \Y N b N O G •ri U a1 IH y-1 r-i G a '17 'O m --- T --- i-�-------- z H6 m >, G c m m 4J a) E m 1.1 .c +1 •r1 u 0 G N I O 3 3 m G O 1.J a) O a) O N )4 1-1 U 'U >i e-i G O O y.J 0O 0 1.J U rC 1U1 't1 m Ln U o cn NG 3 >) G u � a�i cGd CO r-i m a i D z w -1 44 3 w m rz 0 p r K m I N - Q 0" ',4 0 'C) O T) r-i o c '17 1-1 b O N O 1 •^ G r I rl 0 U z- m r-I 0 , m •H .J_ 1 4-+ 1-1 -H r-i r1 M J - °Z I V --- I W G rn O •ri )4 t-, tN a) O N +.1 i.1 O 0 }4 M a) O 2� 4-1 0O U .G O ° O N .� m 4-1 w W 4-1 w to a) m I -! O .a G 4-1 a a) z 10 ,c 4-1 w P O •r1 y-1 a) w C:i �o• a) 0 4J W G E ro 000 0 z° w o• r° >, P `- •r-4 •r-4 0'•n y.J G 3 z .. rH •H r-1 r--1 r-1 r ,a) G I >- cc r;..1-_ ^4.:a- a) cd `aa G }.a.. >,Ln •;..{ .o -.rl u W G2: u 00 •u (1) .-C x m G u r1 0 1r) 0 I p p ca u 0 H u -H �4 u 4-1 CO -H 1~ » w w cn r� a o W - 0) G a) � ^ W x O G 4J m on aJ a) O � r- CJ Z Y �. WUw Gr-1w z 0 w m ,C 0 7rc m a) I 3 V 0 G .z •ri c a) rc O u 4J C O 4� a) rn W c c Z ,LJ O 1.J ro 00 4.J a1 .0 3 }.1 cn ::� U 00 (3) y.J 4-1 c _Q P� O G w 1n cd u y J O w O G P c I / ' -^ `� \ 6 � e r-^1 �t U . •^ v z O m ro O o o N.^O O U C!� G c ro .� .0 y J a) 1] y- to ri y J T 1-- a 4-j 'U 4.1 .0 b m z n ^ I I U/O M t w 4^1 N r1 ,A a) w U ° N G© O 4-1 G ^w +^ O + m a) V N N N P. H O ar O a ca O a, n �V D V a) ® N ri y J 00 G a) N tJ >_4 w ^ bo Rte' rC rc w 1J� -i . R .c u a) a 1 cd 0) •r1 0) a) 0 a) m G y-1 lJ W U U U r 1 w -,T b G .'Z m O N >, �1 N 1 UO 0 .^.r.i G r--i G 3+ a) W w r-1 G " O 1 1 ,- `� �y_ cd b rC ro >,cn cn ro O G r 4 cd •r1 G z y J H O ca ,a U m td N U •ri .J ^r-I ^0 C) % N m •H •ri a) •H I M 0 0 y.J 0 y-1 >,U U 44 � I N ) �4 .c 10 w 00 4J m _C 4.1 m m G w ( V U6O (3) U 4-1 O tr) N P CO 4J a) U Cl) 1-i .0 ca m ro t u cd a) � a) >4 3 3 0 C C ° I N e� p v w 41 w C o O w 41 G co ^'c O ^.c O td c y- m m O a) � u N w 1 - O G N (1) 00 4-1 G 00 "O 1 G •^N G I Q 4 O 1-4 a) a) G •r 1 a) m 1.1 O a) � ^ G y-1 •ri y 1 N ro t 4J n G •11 �4 U -H m W .c. ,..1 O c ri N .4J I 0 I / .' u +J G r1 r-1 G b cd .0 N o u bo a) w m `t Q) m O O r4 >, ro N (1) 00 U 0 •r1 >4 w O ri M ro -ri u > r-i 4..1 CO rC 4 00 00 w m )••, a) '0 w W W a) u > ro N m u 4J G _ .1-1 to a) O I •. �. �i 1 \ w ..C: U 'O cd 3 a) •ri 1-1 � O w t N >, G N U td a) 2 m / VO, \ .\0 / ° � to CO 3 4-4 U N z ca trig o �C o p U Cn CO ^ N I W IU } p I s-1 O raw O O ro 3 a) cn m W to .J u rC Z x m , v z 4-+ O 1 3 a) a ^ u oo a) 4 a1 r-- m m �1 I �- f- W { r/ _^ .. •1`_1 / v ° ..UC •l1 � � ai'v 4J -r-i•r-ii r. CO l�.l w `b W 1..1 ( a tl Z 0 i ( 1 Y� \ 1CF 1� CO • (3) 11 M -00 O G G U •r1 4-1 w G U) O U Q 0 ® ® ('� � Y G co R1 a1 0O•ri O •r-1 O w G 1•+ m O •ri m O cd m a) I ! { i / 9 , O m +J w •ri �+ to r 1 U O N a) ri 4.J 0 'd w W Q C �7 ill m O � W >,r>'i .0 cd m A td G tad m co G to U Cl)M I J ro O' G r-1 » 4.1 3 .c 0 U b cd m m 4-1 cd 0 3 '� 1 / ' r / ` •^ v w -r1 sa 1 x O 4.J .0 CO a) m W a) > I W I y.1 ro m G .= � o m 4, .. � tmd r4 00)) AGO -i .b m rn p F (�0 J\ �b `� P x cd •r-i 4-J O 1 (1) m m m W '0 �4 O )a b N (1) O v a G O ^ •u y J • v 3 m 0o r1 O ro G ;J o 1, 100 1 z -1 ,.c u O m m ,c O 0o 3 o cd m ro (1) cd O m m ( Vl r . 1G i u 3 b 0) 'H a) r-1 ^ ^ ^ � (1) a) 4J 3 N C o w y O 1J O 1.1 t 4.1 o G m G I W z ° y-1 CO )1 �C •ri d_I w m U m n m -H G U z w c v y-1 O r-i N 00 w m 3 U)) W .c 3 ^r-i N � � O 11 •r1 z O 0O )-1 (3) O cd 4J 1) }.I 1 I ` (1.•� \ i (a •rl y-1 G al a) m ,c m r- m i4 m N (1) m 00 }4 c 1 ) JVJ I y.1 4.4 1 � m O O u 4-1 'C) Ir1 c O 7 a) y J O N dIRC >a 0 a ^r-i 0 m w w S- o 0 G z G w G y- > I � W / / r ro w m 0 8 w a 4 O cd .m O m O O a) O m 0 I N a a 1-+ O U m ^ 3 0a a a H u ai u a) U 00 U G a) N / w a) � U ^ U y-1 W )••I a) y-1 0 U 0 O *H a) .-t '} U y-1 G 41 4.J r-i y.J 4J y J "Cl G U 4.J U m � m G m • 'C) 5 >4 10 Ix CO �4 G m a) G H W ro m G 0 M •ri w cd �e2 2 WH U rrl-1 J O W 4-01 U°) 00 p.. W H 'ti O Lnn 4 1 � M m Ca O 'U W 3N I I 9HL do Z/, AA SHt =(O 31Y/7 1SV9 0 m ON UI / r h N W i fa 1 1 i °' / es 130 k* 4J a 0. w 000 tea) J�.J am) i 1 ca G 1f1 ((, ` 1 G O ca 10 rGi I O 24. 0z (1) aim I 1 y.J U m 00 ° a \V '.' (u 3 4 4.) .0 lid , / r^a (1) y-1 `? .A )I 1 N 1?N') i ' ` - Jf �- d/ 4e A - Q a ai rtdi co c" W1a pe O 1JM �4 y 1 000 44 0 o n .,-1 >, 3 � c}, �Q CU 3 � 4J I j \ 0 00 co+J J�-J y Vi O, ,C t r 1 r 1 G 0 5 � �"/V� >, O O I /� 1 C ' `tl) ro U N 1 ® a r ' z T1 M - O ri b ~ m cGd 00 I a.l (1) v (1) 'J Q. �4 >1 tin crn / I i Z V'\ al N. t 1 a O n t + W l V N. "� I Z S//L 'Z/ '7H5 ❑(0 t 1, MN 3HL d0 3N17 LS t i \ `1 V �a'�y- v� y /F j Z 1 VN Q, CL aa;!� , i off' - x W N �1 W CLt _ o a be Go I N � vim+. ' d a I op O >0. l v W w- W- 7ex DATE: November 13, 1980 CASE: PC 80 -38P ITEM: Preliminary Plat of Howe 1st Addition APPLICANT: Howe Chemical, Inc. LOCATION: South of T.H. 101 and .6 miles West of County Road 89 ZONING /LAND USE: I -2 (Heavy Industrial) /Vacant AREA: 20 acres APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 11.33, Section 12 PUBLIC HEARING (cont. from 9/11/80) CASE HEARD BY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CASE HEARD ON: November 18, 1980 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of preliminary plat of a 20 -acre industrial subdivision consisting of two lots. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY: Surrounding Land Uses: North - AG, Agriculture /Future frontage road South - I -1, Light Industrial /Chicago N.W. Railroad, vacant East - B -1, Highway Business /North Star Auto Auction West - I -2, Heavy Industrial /Vacant (Cretex Plat) History: Undeveloped, Rezoned from B -1 (Highway Business) to I -2 (Heavy Industrial) recommended by the Planning Commission on August 14, 1980 and approved by the City Council on September 2, 1980. Conditional Use Permit for exterior storage in I -2 granted by Planning Commission on September 11, 1980. Urban Services Availability: Sanitary Sewer - Not presently served Water - Proposed extension under consideration by the Utilities Commission • Storm Sewer - No facilities planned On -site retention Case No. PC 80 -38P November 13, 1980 Preliminary Plat of Howe 1st Addiion Page -2- 1 CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The proposed plat consists of two blocks and three lots. Lot 1, Block 1 is a lot bounded by T.H. 101 on the North and Cretex Avenue, a frontage road, to the South. It is presently zoned I -2 (Heavy Industrial). Lot 1, Block 1, is not a buildable lot since it is less than the 1 acre minimum lot size required in the I -2 zone. Block 2 consists of two lots; Lot 1 fronting on Cretex Avenue and Lot 2 as proposed has 55' of frontage on Cretex Avenue. Lot 2 will have to be redesigned to meet City standards of the minimum 60 feet of lot area to front on right -of -way. 2. The drainage plan indicates a storm water detention area to serve Lots 1 and 2 of Block 2. Although not indicated on the preliminary plat, the detention area will have to be delineated with a drainage easement. Drainage will run from the south end of Lot 2 to the north. The drainage swale along the west central side of the plat will have to be covered with an easement on the revised plat. The drainage plan has received preliminary approval from the City Engineer. 3. The plat will be served by a railroad spur from the west. The proposed railroad spur as designed would have to be within ten feet of the eastern property line. This requires that the 20 foot utility easement be reduced from 20 feet to 10 feet along the eastern property line. This additional 10 feet was transfered to the western easement on the west side of the plat for a total of 30 foot utility and drainage easement on that side. The City plans to extend a water - main up the west property line of this property and the 30 foot utility easement will be used for that purpose. 4. The developer has submitted percolation tests to satisfy questions concerning the septic system. The test results indicate a fairly rapid rate of percolation. The final system design plans may require the removal of the more permeable material to be replaced with less permeable material. These final plans must be approved by the City Engineer. 5. This site is covered with mature stands of deciduous trees. Staff would request that the developer make an effort to preserve existing vegetation where possible and indicate those clusters on the topography map. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends preliminary plat approval of Howe's 1st Addition conditioned on: 1. Submission of final design of sanitary septic system to be approved by the City Engineer. Case No. PC 80 -38P November 13, 1980 Preliminary Plat of Howe 1st Addition Page -3- 2. Submission of Developers Agreement and park dedication as required per code. 3. Redesign of Lot 2, Block 2, to have a minimum 60' fronting on Cretex Avenue. 4. Submission of a tree preservation plan. 5. Indication of the location and dimension of easements required for the storm water detention area. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Recommend approval of the preliminary plat of Howe 1st Addition subject to the following conditions: 1) Submission of final design of sanitary septic system to be approved by the City Engineer 2)Submission of Developers Agreement and park dedication as required per code. 3) Delete boundaries of Lot 1, Block 2 and adjust square footage as noted on plat and redesignate the lots 4) Submission of a tree preservation plan 5) Indication of the location and dimension of easements required for the storm water detention area. • TK/ j iw MEMO TO: H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer FROM: Steve Hurley, Tech. I RE: Amendment to Holmes Street Assessment Role for Gertrude Brick Property DATE: November 14, 1980 City and County records indicated .73 acres owned by Brick. Questions by Brick prompted checks with County and indicated .70 acres. Subsequent investigation revealed a portion of the original Brick property was sold to Geis and currently constitutes a part of Geis's 1st Addition. This property although recorded was not shown on County records. Brick's assessment had been based on City and County records and therefore was higher than it should have been. County surveyor's department recalculated Brick's property at .50 acres, County records will be changed to indicate this. SH /jms • RESOLUTION NO. 1746 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 1729 ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS ON THE 1980 -3 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HOLMES STREET) • WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1729 on October 21, 1980, which adopted the assessments on the 1980 -3 Public Improvement Program for Holmes Street - Trunk Storm Sewer .additionally benefitted parcels; and WHEREAS, it has been brought to the attention of the Acting City Administrator and City Engineer that the area of Parcel No.. 27- 912 - 5311 - 915 -00 is in error; and WHEREAS, it has also been brought to the attention of the Acting City Administrator and City Engineer that Parcel No. 27 -901- 5300- 030 -01 should be deleted from the assessment roll. NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the assessment roll adopted with Resolution No. 1729 is hereby amended as follows: Page No. 82c of 82g Al W. Wurst Capesius, Joel L. & Wife 227 E. Shakopee Avenue 1 115 23 .01 27- 901 -5300- 030 -01 Doc. 172211 P/0 SE4 SE4 Sec. 1 and P/0 NE4 NE4 Sec 12 Reg. 172.5' E of Lewis St. E on N Line Shakopee Ave. 10.62', N 58' S to Beg. Area: 435.6 sq. ft. Assessment: $0.00 Page No. 82e of 82g Cecelia Gertrude Brick 850 So. Holmes 12 115 23 .50 acre in EZ of NE4 27- 912 - 5311 - 015 -00 Area: 21,780 sq. ft. Assessment: $684.52 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Resolution No. 1740 is hereby repealed in its entirety. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Acting City Clerk Approved as to form this 'day of _ , 1980. • City Attorney MEMO TO: Thomas G. Brownell, Acting City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, Deputy City Clerk RE: Public Hearing on Vacation of Ziegler Easement DATE: November 14, 1980 When the Ziegler Addition was platted an easement for a detention area was included. After the development of the property and completion of a survey of the detention area, it appears that the easement found on the plat is now in- accurate. Ziegler Inc. has provided us with an executed easement for the actual ponding area and is requesting the vacation of the inaccurate easement as shown on Ziegler Addition. After the hearing is held regarding the vacation it would be in order for the Council to adopt a resolution vacating the easement described in the plat of Ziegler Addition. Action: Offer Resolution No. 1745, A Resolution Vacating A Drainage Easement Lying Within The Boundaries Of Ziegler Addition. JSC /jms I c/M1F.M0 Judy Cox . Deputy City Clerk FROM': H. R. Spurrier City Engineer RE: Ziegler Drainage Easement DATE: October 1, 1980 Pursuant to your memorandum dated September 18, 1980, I reviewed the easement to be vacated and the easement to be acquired. The easement to be vacated was vacated because it was not aligned over the detention area. Then a survey was made of the actual detention area. The easement to be acquired was described. It is appropriate. to vacate the original easement and file the easement titled "easement to be acquired ". HRS /jiw cc: Julius A. Coller, II City Attorney • • • RESOLUTION NO. 1745 A RESOLUTION VACATING A DRAINAGE EASEMENT LYING WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF ZIEGLER ADDITION • WHEREAS, the drainage easement totally within Ziegler Addition, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, was platted and dedicated to the public use; and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee has received an executed easement from Ziegler Inc. for the detention area where the ponding area is now located; and WHEREAS, it has been made to appear to the Council that the drainage easement within the plat of Ziegler Addition, described in Exhibit "A" attached, is redundant and serves no public use or interest and has been replaced by a new easement as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof and it would be to the best interests of the general public to vacate said drainage easement; and NOW', THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. That it finds and determines that the vacation, hereinafter described, is in the public interest and serves no further public need, since it has been replaced by a new easement as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof, 2. That the drainage easement described in Exhibit "A ", attached'hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby vacated, 3. That,, after the adoption of this resolution, the City Clerk shall file certified copies hereof with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Scott County. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Acting".City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1980. City Attorney • q cL ORDER NO 10643_ t• WILLIAM D. S C HO E L L SCHOELL & MADSON 1 INC CARLISLE MADSON REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR MINN. NO. 2265 ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS MINN. NO. 4374 50. DAK. 755 5D NINTH AVENUE SOUTH SO. OAK. 791 WIS. NO. E•6176 HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 WIS. NO. S-674 DLO RIOA NO. 6271 PHONE B30 - 760'1 IOWA NO. 3705 NO. OAK. 623 NO. DAK. 1100 MONT. NO. 1616 -E MONT. NO. 1742.5 IOWA NO. 5923 DESCRIPTION R I PTI O N a TEXAS NO. 35659 r7 .! FO qt RAUENHORST CORPORATION EASEMENT TO BE VACATED That particular drainage easement in Lot 1, Block 1, ZIEGLER ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the southwesterly right -of -way line of State Highway No. 101, as dedicated in said plat, with the westerly right -of -way line of Highway 101 Frontage Road, as dedicated in said plat; thence on an assumed bearing of South 5 degrees 43 minutes 01 seconds East along said westerly right -of -way line, a distance of 1 7 87.00 feet to the point of beginning of the easement to be described; t thence North 62 degrees 47 minutes 45 seconds West a distance of 299.67 feet; thence South 4 degrees 49 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 464.00 feet; thence North 53 degrees 53 minutes 25 seconds F., East a distance of 390.00 feet, to a point on the westerly right -of -way �-! line of said Highway 101 Frontage Road, distant 96.00 feet southerly from the point of beginning; thence North 5 degrees 43 minutes 01 seconds West, along said westerly right -of -way line, a distance of 96.00 feet to the point of beginning. April 17, 1980 • • • Exhibit A Page 2 of 2 n ORDER NO. 10 E WILLIAM 0. 5CHOELL SCHOELL S. MAOSO N, INC. CARLISLE MADSON REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR MINN. NO. 2265 ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS MINN. NO. 4374 • 50. OAK. 755 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH 50. DAK. 791 WIS. NO. E•6176 HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 WIS. NO. 5 FLORIDA NO. 6271 PHONE 636 IOWA NO. 3705 NO. DAK. 623 NO. DAK. IIOB MONT. NO. 181• OESCRDESCRIPTION MpNT. NO. 1742-5 i0WA 0 WA NO. 5923 3 a TEXAS NO. 35659 FOAL RAUENHORST CORPORATION EASEMENT TO BE ACQUIRED A perpetual easement for drainage purposes over and across the following described property: Lot 1, Block 1, ZIEGLER ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof. Said easement is described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the southwesterly right -of -way line of State Highway No. 101, as dedicated in said plat, with the westerly right -of -way line of Highway 101 Frontage Road, as dedicated in said plat; thence on an assumed bearing of South 5 degrees 43 minutes 01 seconds East along said westerly right -of -way line, a distance of 87.00 feet to the point of beginning of the easement to be described; thence North 62 degrees 47 minutes 45 seconds West a distance of 289.65 feet; thence South 0 degrees 10 minutes 44 seconds East a distance of 464.00 feet; thence North 48 degrees 23 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 355.44 feet, to a point on the westerly right -of -way line of said Highway 101 Frontage Road, distant 96.00 feet southerly from the point of beginning; thence North 5 degrees 43 minutes 01 seconds West, along said westerly right -of -way line, a distance of 96.00 feet to the point of beginning. April 17, 1980 . • • Exhibit B Page 1 of 2 �— ., q , -- �.� � --- - - -' -- . - ; ..,� .... 1163.24 �• _ _ -- _ .. • T �/ ROAD ® _--, -- -...638.13 .... -----795.86 "" ........ �.. _ -.. • _ : • . /25.58 • .. 1 ;;// ... /� � ' L= 31.42 0 ..........7 ( r � r Easel7�en t —_—•.. . ‘ 6...U1257:55Z. 0 • � fL� • •... 206 i .. � ` ! . co ti ,V .° rS 5 °43'p „ E �' +` :hi -oo , � \ �`'li HIGHWAY 610/ FNTAGE, ROAD', 84 °16 s9++�✓ � 309.5 RO • -. /: ,t. . _ /. J • 8 7 00 .. a -, _ 96.o0;;' i .._,..____\ L = 95 ® iM _u ._ \. : . C =86.27 %. j� " o , :661 -\ : o 0 : / (� 41 1 g h � r IU! F or way l,ne o� \ / c ` ; o 0 ` b � - ,�: �� \ �y �onf o9e Rd y • \ 0 \ , 0 ,� : _. .; . \ • / • , ., 7 •(.. � •• / 25.38 � e '' `' / : ....90.104-4)t- \ • ;.t........„.-_...„--..:..,.€ 6 e - p. — ....7-..-,..*-7A I s. / •Q> • �' • 9 .sp 464 00....... ; F `` •, co . GJ �__�� — c i' / / / 464 00 • q -. J '�' • .3¢°4976 „ jv i / / \ • , •, / - ., ) • Shaded Area = Easement to be • 1 / Vacated Lined Area .' Easement to' be. - • _.. _�_ _.. _ / ,,T.. _ .= Acquired • • 5?:16 Macey Manor Senior Citizens, Inc. 438 Dakota St. Shakopee, Mn. Nov. 17th, 1980 Tel. 445 -3821 Shakopee City Council `c /o mr. Harbeck 129 E. First Ave. Shakopee, Mn. Gentlemen: This is to reaffirm our serious objection to reassess Macey Manor Propertyf.or a water line that was installed to furnish water to the Clifton development. Our water line was installed and paid for when our building was built in accordance to rec- ommendation of the Shakopee City Engineer. We have had an ample water supply for the past ten years. This should prove that we don't'hother source for our water supply. We have been advised that there are numerouse water line situations the same as ours in Shakopee. This will not increase the value of our property one cent. We don't, feel you have a legal right to reassess our prop- erty. We suggest you reread the letter we sent you dated June 20th,79. Truly yours by Macey manor Senior Citizens gA4,9. • 4/ NOV 1 7 hibu c fY OF SHAKO SEE • Macey Manor Senior Citizens, Inc. 438 Dakota St. Shakopee, Mn. June 20th, 1979 Tel. 4 -3821 Shakopee City Council c/o City Adminstrator 129 E. 1st. Ave. Shakopee, Mn. Gentlemen: This is to inform you that we, the property owners of Macey Manor, Inc. seriously object to the recommendation of the new City EJngineor (which Shakopee has had many) to change the rules so that we on the west side of Dakota St. will be reassessed for the cost of furnishing water to the new construction on the east side of Dakota St. We have been advisedthat our water supply is ample for the west Side of Dakota St. and that it was installed in accordance to the recommendation of a former City En ineer. We have spoken to the other property owners on the west side of Dakota St. and they are' of the same mind. We assure you that we do not intend to take this laying down. Macey . Manor has 11 units, occupied by 11 Senior Citizens. We feel that we are being over - charged for our water and sewer use, especially, on sewage disposal. Last year 1978 we paid a total of $208.00 including tax for water and 038.35 for sewage disposal. We used 129,000 gals. of water below the minium. So in effect we paid sales tax on 129,000 gals. of water we did'nt• use. We feel that our sewage costs are totally out of line. Respectfully yours, Macey 1;anor, Inc. b - 794(2! I , h • 01°- • P.3. Dakota St. is being abusedby the heavy construction truc.,s and equiptment.. Any needed repairs should be charged to them. MEMO T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer RE: Macey Second Addition DATE: November 17, 1980 During the past week there has been considerable discussion regarding the Macey Second Addition project. To briefly recapitulate, a few weeks ago, the builder, Goodwin, was advised that no more than 20 loads of dirt from the west side of Minnesota Street would be moved to his building sites. The purpose of this fill was to bring the site to final grade. To get the material moved, City staff called Wangrin, Inc. and advised them that in order to fully satisfy the terms of the rough grading contract, top soil had to be respread on the site. This had not been done since the site had not received the excess material from Holmes Street. The City now holds $3,075.00 from the Rough Grading Contract. $2,000.00 represents work not performed and $1,075.00 represents the retainage on $21,500.00 of work judged to be completed. I have taken the position that work not performed, respreading topsoil, should not be paid. I have further left the initiative to the contractor to do the work and be paid, or to not do the work and not be paid. If there are any questions regarding this matter please contact me. HRS /jms ? MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: H. R. Spurrier City Engineer RE: Resolution No. 1744, A Resolution Adopting Assessments 1979 -2 Public Improvement Program DATE: November 14, 1980 Attached is the above - referenced resolution with the assessment roll for the Fourth Avenue Watermain Project (79 -2). The assessment hearing is scheduled for your November 18th City Council meeting. After hearing all objections and making your considerations, this resolution with the attached assessment roll, could then be adopted. j iw Attachments " r RESOLUTION NO. 1744 A Resolution Adopting Assessments 1979 -2 Public Improvement Program (Fourth Avenue Watermain) WHEREAS, Pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council of the Cityof Shakopee met and heard and • passed upon all objections to the proposed assessments of: Installation of watermain in the area South of 4th Avenue and North of the former Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, Pacific Railroad tracks between Minnesota and Dakota Streets NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. That such proposed assessments together with any amend- ments thereof, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assess- ment against the lands named therein and each tract.therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvements in the amount of the assessments levied against it. 2. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual install- ments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first install- ment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1982, and shall bear interest at the rate of 8.0 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added the interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1981, and to each subsequent installment when due shall be added the interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid Within thirty (30) days from the adoption of this resolution; he may thereafter pay to the County Treasurer the installment and interest in process of collection on the current tax list, and he may pay the remaining principal balance of the assessment to the City Treasurer. Resolution No. 1744 Page Two 4. The clerk shall file the assessment rolls pertaining to this assessment in his office and shall certify annually to the County Auditor on o.r before October 10th of each year the total amount of installments and interest which are to become due in the following year on the assessment on each parcel of land included in the assessment roll. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: • Acting City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1980. • 19 80 RSSESSmEfTS FOR SPECIAL. ImPROVEmEI1T DISTRICT. 79 -2 11/18/80 Assessment ti FOURTH AVENUE WATERMAIN H . 0 r OWNER DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE AREA J FRONT ASSESSMENT TOTAL a • LOT BLOCK PARCEL NUMBER Clifton Limited 1 1 27- 080 - 0000 - 001 -00 223,604 $11,230.98 $11,230.98 V 20 Nineth Street Southeast Clifton Addition Rochester, MN 55901 x� a a 1 Gayle Putnam 1 1 27- 032- 0000 - 001 -00 1;701.05 $ 85.44 85.44 t 4 1365 Tonkawa Road Apt. 1 1/11 Int. ii Wayzata, MN 55391 Macey Plat Theodore Jasper 1 1 27- 032 - 0000 - 002 -00 1 701.0 $ 85.44 85.44 1117 Harrison Apt. 2 1 /11 Int. Shakopee, MN 55379 Mace y Plat 4 Theodore Jasper 1 1 27= 032 - 0000 - 003 -00 ( 1,701.04 $ 85.44 85.44 f 1117 Harrison Apt. 3 1 /11 Int. �1 Shakopee, MN 55379 Macey Plat 2. Ray W. Baker 1 1 27- 032- 0000 - 004 -00 1,701.05 $ 85.44 85.44 ay 438 Dakota Street Apt. 4 Apt. 4 1 /11 Int. 4 ._ Shakopee, MN 55379 Macey Plat Theodore Jasper 1 1 27 -032- 0000 - 005 -00 1,701.09 $ 85.44 85.44 .x. s 1117 Harrison Apt. 5 1 /11 Int. 1 4 Shakopee, MN 55379 Macey Plat . . • Margaret H. Peterson 1 1 27 -032- 0000 - 006 -00 1,701.0° $ 85.44 85.44 438 Dakota Apt. 6 Apt. 6 1/11 Int. Shakopee, MN 55379 Macey Plat ;, F 714 ; :Ay.4tr.. 7-4 4TV..1: a.'_ _ " . . +•3Y'! �1,'i'�' rte-'.. ice �" . _ _ _ _., ma y, . -,, .. ... Page 1 of �3 _ . i � r i9. 80 ASSESSITIE I I S FOR SPECIAL. iMPROYE E(1T DISTRICT 79 -2 11/18/80 Assessment , . FOURTH AVENUE WATERMAIN Hearing . . i 1 OWNER DESCRIPTION AREA FRONT FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT TOTAL ii E LOT BLOCK PARCEL NUMBER Mrs. Agnes G. Wiesner 1 1 27- 032 - 0000 - 007 -00 1,701.09 $ 85.44 $ 85.44 • 438 Dakota St. Apt. 7 Apt. 7 1 /11 Int. Shakopee, MN 55379 Macey Plat IP 4 Esther A. Griffith 1 1 27- 032 - 0000 - 008 -00 1,701.09 i $ 85.44 $ 85.44 438 Dakota Street Apt. 8 1 /11 Int. A Shakopee, MN 55379 Macey Plat N w Wilson M. Ewert 1 1 27 -032- 0000 - 009 -00 1,701.09 $ 85.44 $ 85.44 > 438 Dakota St. Apt. 9 Apt. 9 1 /11 Int. f Shakopee, MN 55379 Macey Plat 1 t Elfie L. Engen 1 1 27- 032- 0000 - 010 -00 1,701.09 $ 85.44 $ 85.44 f 438 Dakota St. Apt. 10 '' Apt. 10 1 /11 Int. Shakopee, MN 55379 Macey Plat 7 O EA Harold Schroers 1 1 27 -032- 0000 - 011 -00 1,701.09 $ 85.44 $ 85.44 r 7' 438 Dakota St. Apt. 11 Apt. 11 1 /11 Int. '} .. Shakopee, MN 55379 Macey Plat • Ralph C. Christenson 2 -3 1 27- 032 - 0000 - 012 -00 1 1 8 ,33 1 . $920.70 $920.70 N 518 Dakota Street N 5' of Lot 3, Blk 1 Shakopee, MN 55379 Macey Plat _ q Joseph R. Christensen 3 1 27- 032 - 0000 - 013 -00 :10,299 $517.25 $517.25 528 Dakota Street S 60' Macey Plat Shakopee, MN 55379 •. .. s . A ' ' " f f i o . ._. . h Y . . n .,4:. " , . - a e c . . _.,-' : : ` = �'• -.t - . . ; . � ' . o = y _ ' - ' � ' Z " � , - r . ' a* .. l -`w. ---,,,,.-_-:••;_&-,;„,•,_ _ _. , s c y ' v ' • . . . „ : . . . ' e ms w - .t s..c ti w j_. - .. - . � _ , � � i - " , y y . _ t ^ rte. • Page 2 of 3 --c3 , 198o RsSESsmEnTS FOR SPECIR . 1 3PPOVE(TtEfT DISTRICT ._ 79 -2 11 /18 /80 Assessment 'N Hearing AA FOURTH AVENUE WATERMAIN r OWNER DESCRIPTION AREA FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT TOTAL ei LOT BLOCK PARCEL NUMBE 1 3 Ralph C. Christenson 3 1 27- 032 - 0000 - 013 -01 10,342 $519.46 $518.4 o 518 Dakota Street N 65' of Lot 3 Blk 1 ex. N 5' Shakopee, MN 55379 Macey Plat s VI a 1 Harold Marschall & Marie 4 1 27- 032 - 0000 - 014 -00 21,311 $1,070.39 $1,070.39 2240 Marschall Road Macey Plat 2 Shakopee, MN 55379 R `{ Craftmaster Homes, Inc. 5 1 27- 032- 0000 - 015 -00 24,207 $1,215.84 $1,215.84 . 1117 Harrison Macey Plat 41 Shakopee, MN 55379 e 0 TOTAL $16,414.4 0 V g I 11 1 g rA 7 . U - WIX AV�..A:�.`��.z'��. . , �s .. - `'��� ' �' 3. a�"�a iw cC' cs�:.��iz�� - � �� _ 3$� � eIYW • a. - .� _. sc Page 3 of 3 - ---, I - Af` ? rT. CITY 0 S 'AIC ill PEE } INCORPORATED 1870 Lam it - ,..-. ,, �' 4% ti s 129 E. First Ave. - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445 -3650 c9 .. . .{ a �• ':�.* ` r 1 1 November 10, 1980 '� u Mr. C. R. Yessaian . K -mart Corporation 3100 West Big Beaver Troy, Michigan 48084 Re: Permit l; Fces - • Dear Mr. Yessaian: Please be advised a separate permit is required for the conveyor system and electri.cal work for the conveyor being installed at your distribution center in Shakopee. Also I would like to mention all change orders regarding this project require computation of added value for permit purposes. At our pre- construction meeting the Administrator was adamant about K -mart providing >>:_; w:.i.th documented cost; data as to the value of this project. As yet it has not been provided. Minnesota Statutes provides a vehicle for full disclosure regarding historical costs. At the completion of this project unless this information is forthcoming voluntarily, we intend to utilize this vehicle to obtain the necessary information to base the added value permit fee on and as a preliminary in -' dication of value for ad valorem purposes. Your cooperation is respectfully requested. Sincerely, k/5 LeRoy Houser. Building Official LFI -1 : pik T /1 ' 11 l' 01 1• 1 t) / 1 J 00 ,l 1• e :Z 1 it / 1 i' 1/ An Equal Opportunity Employer " MEMO TO: Thomas Brownell, Acting City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: 1981 Shade Tree Program DATE: November 13, 1980 Resolution No. 1743 needs to be adopted to authorize and complete the application for the 1981 Shade Tree Program. It is anticipated that the application will be approved and that the State will pay 50% of our program costs. GV /jms • • RESOLUTION NO.'1743 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SHADE TREE GRANT APPLICATION FOR 1981 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota passed Resolution No. 1706 adopting the 1981 General Fund Budget which is excerpted here; including estimated allowance for equip- ment use; Shade Tree Sanitation Reforestation Personal 5,445 1 , 815 Equipment Use 2,500 750 • Outside Contracts 9,000 • Miscellaneous 1,480 1,750 TOTAL 18,425 4,315 WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee desires the State of Minnesota to participate in the cost of the Shade Tree Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and the City Administra- tor are hereby authorized to execute and submit .the 1981 Shade Tree Program Application to the Minnesota Department of Agriculture. Adopted in _ session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this _ day of , 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of -- , 1980. City Attorney • 7 I • . 1 I • 1 6. (' irlb ' i r ' , . I Al AK ?*, - • CHECK REGIST • 11-4378: Par • 1 r . • . IIENDe ITEM DESC:UPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 11 P.O. n MESSAGE f.!, : 31S:19 11/13/1, '...:: ALPHA TOOL PRODUCTS ECUTP.MAINT. 11-4230-421-42 4C1S . 5 '; .. - a .1 • - a . .. - . ' 6116.4. . . ..*-CKS a to 11 _.1.2.2.4i..-: ASSOCIATECLASIMALT_ PATCUINC ,MATERIALS ..&7.1.-4.241=421.r92 . 12 -- 1 .0 1,243.10 • 13 I. 15 ' • • •.•_7CKS.______ , s i le 3.75 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY GENERAL ^ SUPPLIES C1-4220-421-42 ,0 - ..11/.1)/11 1...ii8. AUID .C.ENTI1 Al_aliPPLY §..E.N.ER.AL_...alPf1 alm12.2.0.1-.851 20 AUTC CENTRAL SUPPLY 318326 ;1-4220-441-44 21 ( 1 3181' 1:/11/32 15.63 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES J1-4220-441-44 2 , " 31f! 1 i/ 13/.11 _ _ ._ _4. . _ ....._ AUTO CPIT ALsuppLyGENERAL stippt.ils. ... .:11- .._ ' 111■?6 11/13/" ' 6.33 AUTO CENTRAL 'SUPPLY iiiijIP. IIAINT. '.11-42-30-421-42 25 26 , 31111"( 11/12/,.1:' 13.25 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY ECUIF. MAINT. 01-4230-621-62 ] 1 ' .31 1.1/1/1:, AUTO CENTRAL SUP_ELy VEHICLE E MAINT . 01-4232-121-12 20 315■:26 11/15/3) 133.36 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINT. • 1-4232-312-11 3'E 11/1'/1/ 98.25 AUTC'CENTRA1 SUPPLY VEHICLE VAINT. '31-4232-321-32 31 ) ; 24 31s 11/11/1.' 47.63 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-331-33 321 - . - -. , • . -.-.. , . - . ..--- -- ..... ..... 3318)26 11/13/00 231.91 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-421-42 3 3 34 ) ( -*- 315C:26 11/17/18 19.57 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINT. 31 , 4232-621-62 - 35 1 ., 55.1 li , 36 , 20 37 35 ) ( ' 318327 11/11/3: 9.32 JEANNE ANDRE TRAVEL EXP. • 01-4330-121-12 35 -" 1131'7 11/1'/11 7.67 JEANKE ANDRE TRAVEL EXP. 81-4339-125-12 40 31817'7 11/12/AC 9. JEANNE ANDRE • TRAVEL EXP. 15-4330-125-12 41 •( .". 318;07 11/17/81 9.J7 JEANNE ANDRE TRAVEL EXP. 15-4330-125-12 j'.. 3 18j? 7 ... ._11.1_1.21 9.0 7 _ JEANg: ANORE _ IBAILEL__Exe 1 5 m!1333.7.19t:19 _____ _ 9 , ' 318727 11/11/"1 11.34 JEANNE ANDRE TRAVEL EXP. 22-433G-196-1q 40 .( ' 3131 !1 11/11/8 29.60 JEANNE ANDRE TRAVEL EXP. 24-4330-192-1J . _ 62.i: .... , _ . _ .., . • ...-CKS 51 s • _ 52 .1. ' 3134 11/1C/41 27.9j VARY A. ARLT OTHER PROF SFR. J1-4315-171-17 53 1 i 41 2'.50 • 5 .: ‘1 ! ■., ,po - : .■3 , , .4.-Cli ' 44 • 5098 0 ) 31811'52 11/11/81 183.70 BATTERY WHSE.INC. EOUTP. BMATNT. 11-4230-421-42 60 _ - 45 183.7J 52 03 ' '"' • • • 64 . . . _„. ,....._ . - . . ... -. .........,.. 16d 318(1'57 11/13/3 3311.04 BRAUN ENG. ENGTNEERTAG SERVTCES 53-4312-911-91 11899 67 ,■ 338.94 a . k ' f89. - 9, , 69 . '' • .. 54 72 --- - ,.. . I 318160 11/12/1j 98.5J BRYAN AGGREGATES - ROAD MATERIALS 11-4240 -. -427-42 73 7. \ I I -"' 98.10 • : 7 9 ' ‘ I■fl . 7 46664. , . Ni . | ( 1 `3.o. r:!f .r '114 •••-.' u!cc, REGIS TER 11 !!.A." -_z_ ^ '` ~ cx17.ry u. EA IF `om/or VENDOR /rco :cscnzpr/ow ACCOUNT NO. �nw. : P.O. v MESSAGE - '__�--___---_---_-'_---___---------____-___----__-___'__-_-__-- , , ^ 313763 1x/3'': °'1^:1 ouyxoovvs.. sEwcx*L SUPPLIES :1-4e23-151-1 : " . " '318 . ....3 ; '/i'/�` - . 1 5. -'.5 _ _ UyR8OyGPS E CORP . �g/�, MA TNT. } - -----'------ � 63.85 ^� � i. to -__* ''-'• __-_ '_' � " to '----�--���� ----��--�-----------_���.e `, 11 = zm�m ; n,w BUS NESS puxNrroxs GENERAL xuppLs: �1-*o2u-m1-1s 61332 --_' '" '~ ---------'---' '-- ''------ ' -' p .` `, .` ^^^-cxs `^ | ---'— ---'----------'--------- ___'____ -- ___________ `^ 1 ., �;x 1///vu 197 ....3 TOM auxooEu TRAVEL EXPENSE 11-4333- ., m / � 21 • 16 157.33 • 22 23 ' .. .. - _ -'------__ --_---_-_ - ' --- -' --- '--___--_ ^4 ' ^^^-cxS � ' , 26 ' -_z m u z� ��/��/uu__---_- z��4�~�/ '-z � ,/ 2,345.97 -- ^���^��_^��.-_- ^�-�ua�^���^ ��z/��u � ,^ e^345.vr ^ - ' -- �� � ^^ • 3 ■ = --' ' '----- ---'-------'—_-------- ------------- -----------' - -- - --' - '-'-�������___-p" . A'" 3am7 1y1 3/m 467.21 COP INC. �mc OFF EQUIP. 11-4333-121-12 93390 � . ^ --_� . - � ,u _-_-__- � ~~ � ^°°-cxo � � 39 ^ . '. " ' .' 318.391 11/13/33 104,16 CHAPIN PUBLISHING LEGAL NOTICES 53-4350-411-91 e1664 - '- -- ° • 1n4.�u • = ,, 43 ' ^^ ---------------- --' -- ---- --' e ` ^^.^^^ ^, � ^^°-cxx ^^ '� 3�u��� ��!��/�' �-- - -_---- 1`���.11�'_—__—_U� �� ��V{�[� ��—���—���—�� ^ ---__' _ - - ~ 11469.17 A 146 ' ` --'.` 11/13 . , ` 328.11 `=^""" TRACTOR EQUIF.MAINT. '11-4230-621-62 . • -___-_- __--_—_-- . . - ! " 31R13: 11/1 i/80 16. CUNNINGS HOWE. GENERAL SUPPL IES 3 1-4220-311-31 61 63 31eLso 11/12/36 19.67 DUNNIN:GS 11 �* `1 3mz"' 1 - GENERAL '-- .31-4220-441-44 ^'-- zzu/��--_ .. 1. -'- --P-- 01-4220-611-61 = 31:11 1' 11/11/.11 33.'13 �� ouoxm �u *cu- ---- I:1 �^--- . ~^ 31313: 11/11/1J 3a.” nowxIxCo xcwc. o�mcx»[ SUPPLIES «11-4220-621-62 - -2'-2-2 . ~ 31'11 1 : - ' -. - . ;�L ��___--.DyNNI sm,Ip0_ PURCHASES -_- 31-4225�42��42 2 13,33 * ----- — - -'-'- [ 1 ^'" L�^���� . 314 214 11/11/.'*: 361..13 EARL r.oxE_uuro MOTOR FUELS 11-e22-421-42 13116 ! 1 LI \ 1 C;V r: 1 1 r ,. r ...1r•r '7" . . CHM( F:. sTF.: 1 1 • 7'Alit .........3_ ) . • ,-- „ 2 •-, (HccK 1. C,ITL :.MOL1 vEND0q ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV• H P.G. U MESSAGE 3 5 - -- • . .. . • • -- • - : 1 4 3f:1 • - : • 6 i • • 7 • a . . ' t - "q<S....____. a ] ' o 31nI47 11/13M 15.43 EASTMAN DRUG PRINT.1REPRGOUC• ;1-4351-311-31 . „ i A.171...' . • • _ 12 i 10 13 14 i 1 . 1 •••-CKS 15 . ,........--_, ._ _ . ” 31A1C,7 11/13P:..1 339.A4 FAMILY TREE SERVICE OTHER PROF SERVICFS '11-4315,651-65 17 10 339.n4 • ..-' 10 20 i "" •••4111 •• a-CKS 21 1 ( 87 22 23 3 1 : 1 1 7 ' _ 1 :11.1(•!,;._ _. ...... ... _____ *70 „ AA__ __ EA R I_ __F L E K______________ TRAVEL__E X PENST_ _ _ _ J1:1 ._ . __ . . _ _. ___________2• , sui 544.0) 25 1 ` .1 26 ° ( `' 1 27) 29 3 A 23 3181 /t; 11/13/11 265.27 FRANZ ENGR .REPROD• GENERAL SUPPLIES 01-4220-411-41 31 $ 265.27 • 32 • - - ------- 33 ( ' .•*-('KS 34 35 ' 41 . 36 11/1)/' : 3) .=.:1 C., & 1- SAN T TATION GARB.. DrSPOSAL . )1-4373-181-18 37 30 ■ ( "' 3 - I P 1 . ! 1 1/1''/ , : 25 • ;...) G & F SAN! SANITATION GARB. DISPOSAL '11-4373-311-31 :,6 • 3141 I:/13/.,' 25..)7 G & H SANITATION GARB. DISPOSAL_ )1-43737321-32 _ ... 310111 11/13/P) 25,03 G & H SANITATION GARS. DISPOSAL t11-4373-121-42 41 42 318141, 11/13/13 25.03 G & 8 SANITATION GARB. DISPOSAL 31-4373-621-62 43 $ : $ . 318111 Liiii/11 144.50 G & H SANITATION GARB. DISPOSAL , 11-4373-628-62 44 3101 11/13/13 8,994.69 G & H SANITATION GARB. DISPOSAL ;1-4373-711-71 45 46 • 1 .,., 11136846 . 47 45 - • "•• - - - ..' 44.1414 ••*-CKS 49 . 50 51 GnuLos caulla. _Foul Il ____ 31_-4511_7_621:62.10747 4,198.16 . 03 54 55 . .7 444444 .-cks se _ 57 56 1I/15/.;) 29.12 GENERAL OFFICE PROD. OFFICE SUPPLIES 11-4210-121-12 .6 29.12 . 60 61 • - 62 . .'' ••;441 . *7CKS 03 , ..I• 64 - 1 31?1fl4 11/i3/1: 4.13 HARMONS HOWE. HANK GENERAL SUPPLIES 31-4220-421-42 0 .- 1 311214 11/13/1. 2.34 HARMONS HOWE. HANK GENERAL SUPPLIES 01-4220-441-41 67 1 .8 1 it 13n3 ; 2.1,3..". _HARLIN ..1.10.u5,1 Sv,, _ J (1 oL_ PLIEL y A Sf, S 11.:_422.5:.1217ft 2 .--------- 69 70 , 1 " 71 r" 31 11/1'/ 10.j'7 LEROY HOu CONF. 1 SCHOOLS 11-4308-331-11 72 • - ..-.. - - ' - lio 1!/1. lo..., LE HOUSER CONF. & SCHOOLS :11-4390-331-31 /3 74 i «' 31(17 ti 111:3/.1; 19•:.,1 LEROY FOUSER CONF.& SCHOOLS 91-4390-331-33 , l .1 _LI. 1-1 .Z.9$ • •••-CKS . ` ., . | ^ . \,... L�x: CHI' 7.i: '~'� cnc�x Kr91sT�� -� ^ cxrm NA. :^r • :nIuN. vc*uug ITEM osyc,Uprmo ACCOUNT uo. Imv, o p.o. U MESSAGE - ' ^ _'_---__-- ...... -'_ ---____- ' ' " /m` 1 1://i/1 4,1c2.n �mocu-eoxpx, EQUIP. CAPITAL �o o/v. 71-4511-421-42 " _ , . � _' - �-�.1�C,`z �� ___---__�_-'___-__'-__' '._ _ . ____________� " .( 0 � ." ~^^-cxs , . _- o 1 " 211211 11/1^/17 1.) xEwNms xxcLu FOUTP. Mx/NT. 01-4230-621-62 '" ( ' 3/1:11 11/1nM 16,25 ewxENx svcLLr oc*IcLc o»I:T. 11-4e32-112-31 " ' J{1D1 |������/L ________7, ;.:1 b���Cg������ �l��� ��Ig� �l-13�����l-�� - .4 - _ _ � --'--�_ _ ° ' ^--� -- - ' - - -___----__-_� zs ° J zx ` ' ' c , ' `" .` -_' • • • . • ' �----_'-_-_-' ---__ __- -- -__-_--_ = i `^ �� �-- a !( '` 319: s :u �� //'. 13c.`` IDS LIFE �. REMIT. IDS ucr,cp 31-492/-911-91 22 _-'- 1 J ") " . ! 1 A _____ _______ ___ __ __ 24 .. - --- ( '' 26 ^^^ c,s � - 27 1 ^. 2U 22 31.125^ 1i/i`/..: 42'0) /wsIAm/ TESTING ENGINEERING SER. 01-4312-411-41 29 ( "" 31x2io 11/12/A) 14.:o INSTANT TESTING ENGINEERING SER. 56-4312-403-41 = `^ - — -- 5l^:n _--_� ,� ^. ,, `( ` a� ) a�c" 11/13/30 132.0u INTL. mxxmrcx EQUIP. MAINT. 01-4230-421-42 34 :: -_-__ _-_�__-- ~ . .; ~^ 37 ,( 10 ^^^-cxs ^/ � ° 39 + ' " 31d206 11/12/90 25.76 ucoxss JOHNSON Jx, . TRAVEL EXPENSE 01-4330-141-14 " --------� . . .. z5.76 • " ' -----�-------- --' --------- .14 ^ ^■~-cxu ( JD / ~ 31 u ' n ! 1 1 / 1 !./:A 1' ____ . - --a^)� __________ KnEmgCLS-S.[4UgA8g___--_'yEU/[LC u 4 lAl2 ' - )1-1n2-1�1-N - ^' 311267 11/17./1: 13.5 x6cxwcmx STANDARD VEHICLE MAINT. 31-4e3z�3u-o -'----- � ~ n�,so * ' � ° _ _._______'___ _____ __-____—____-____ � ^ ^^^ -cvs 53 ' ."' ' .31:1r(!! _1.1( . .1 . 2:Q3 . .14___ _LEGAL SEEP/lCE�i____ _ 2 31/3211 11/13/10 ea.au xxuon/hc,cp/xnww/mo � LEGAL SERVICES 23-4S10-911-91 " 1 ( ^ 318271 11/13/13 59.0u xnxny/rc,cx,uxwwIws: , LEGAL SERVICES 56-4310-911-91 "* ° _ z^zx4"Ao, °__ __ ' ` __ � ( ~ "' ) ( ^ ^^^'cxo 62 "a ° ) = ~ 3182/3 11/13/Iu 1,10 PHYLLIS KNUDSEN . CONF. u SCHOOLS 01-4390-141-14 � 1. ^ 1.2.-1 ^ 66 67 60 ^^^-cxs - 60 = . ] ,` ; ~` • J`.i%.17 1 ',/1 .1/ _ - ' _ - _ 3!.52 --_ LANO - EQUIPMENT - - -- __: _ _GENERAL - SUPPLIES ' ')1-4220-421-42 -- 'o 37.50 ° ', I Z t.:'. L_'31czuo___--_� /u'-_ VppLy_ ouPPLILo 0-622-62 ______________ �] 3y2^5 11/13/,`j 1.65.11 Lxrxxup PAINT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 01-42e0-639-62 ` 1 '' . '' '`d [4i • 1.=8 '|T/ '' ��»,,/= c/ cc vc�/���� � � ' / " 11 ."�n�-.-�_-__/ '/ ^ (HECK a. ur ' ' AMOUNT vcxuux ITEM ucxcpIpoow ACCOUNT NO. INV. x P.O. w , MESSAGE " � -_-' _' -�_---__'---'-----_-_-_-_'__�' - - '-'__ - '-- ' ' _--_--____ ^ ' ^ , . " , | ^ ! - - - . - .- ..... --- - _ -_- ^���� | ` _- e| - - - - ' - --� ` ' � - ^^ " | / ^ 318297 1u1x,� »4o.ls LOGIS EDP cuuIp,ncwc' C/-1xn^-1sz-1s ° ... -_-�u�,��-� � Is ---' ------ -----'-'---- ----- -----'--------'--' ----------------- • --------------------- | '" � ( .^ '' ^ ^^^-cxS ., ' - - - - --'---' ------------� ----�-�- ---- ' --- -- ' -__' . - - -____ ----___-___ e ' »m»1: Ix13/o; 7.50 LONE STAR LIFE REMIT. CAN. INS. 81-4926-911-91 '` ( .^ 7.' • ." '4 ^_ '" 20 `^ ^.^..^ �� -�_-----_--_----_--_-__ -_ • ^^^-cxs =` ( ., 22 '^ 318M 11/12/, 1 _ LOCAL UN l ON H 323 ���ll����D��� �l���������-�! 23 19, ozs.za ^ :..a ( 26' Al" /1 - �� ����� ^1 ( 31831? 11/1:f11/1:f11/1:f/3: 271 'J1-4230-421-12 x^cCuccx EQUIP. EQUIP. xxInr. 'J1-4230-421-12 "w ' 271 • -'_--____ � ] ( 3m7Io 11/11P11 79.e5 wxLxcnoon MOTORS EQUIP. *xzwr. 01-1230-312-31 ' '�mJLo__.� ilZ1:/u — �-- __-_-_- .1.14.111._ .1.14.111._ 81.7:5 • uaLuEuuum _-_- -xEbz11�-uuJa/' --__-_-u��e�uu7�21�� '_--_'--__-_�_-__---_-_''_ � , ( ...a � ~/ • 3: ^. _ -_-__- � �� 40 - - - ' ---'_ � ° ( " 318328 11/1"5/15 22-4220-196-19 o MILLER oxv/u GENERAL SUPPLIES ez-°eco-�-�s = ,�n ° ° ~ ( ° . ^^^'cxs 47 .al " z/no^ �// �`/�� 67 LARRY TRAVEL EXPENSE 91-4330-111-14 � � - ---'' ( ^ 3111231112:-; �///. 15.06 J ��� � 15.06 LARRY ^' ^^' '~ MARTIN MEETING EXPENSE J1-4396-J1-4396-141-14 50 x �� � "' .. � ^^^-crs 75 56 ^ 118332 118332 ,� 118.54 `x ��/�/ o,�� rTw^ n - ,ocwcp ASSN. acx�T, cxw, INS. 81-4926-911-1 ' - - --------'� 148.54 ^ nb '. .0 ~1 '-- - -----�-- 60 ^^^^^^ 61 ^^^'cxx ,, 62 318131 11/12/;) 15.q4 MTNN.VALEYELEC. ELECTRICITY 1 1-4370-1P1-18 = ' 318:11 11/13/r; 5/'1z x/wx.vxucr ELEC.. ----' cLEcrxzonr ' 01-4370-351-35 - 92.'46 ^ 86 • ° '_ � . ,J ^^^-cm � ] ,. �\^�1/ 1//z»` 22` MIN*cG«SCO NAT GAS & HEAT 1/-*sn-m!-1x ,, SmIA/ 1 5.';.3 xIwmcGxucu . NAT GAS & HEAT 11-4371-182-18 - — " ` 1 31821/ 11/1?/ 2.)5 ozwwc:xxca NAT GAS u HEAT :!1-4371-311-31 ^ 1 - Jwj�� |/f 1)/x� _-_ - - ____� I l� 8 ___-_-_MlN ._-- NAT GAS ��EAI_ � -4371-521-32 7D . ' . ' 1 A [ l ' i l C [ I ( . . ' f . A10% . . . . CH EC N RE li I'S T :78 11-13-8) . PA C , 2 . CHECK 51. C-11E AAGUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. A MESSAGE 3 4 • . ' 111337 11/15/ 9H.6^ H4NNEGASCO NAT GAS t HE'Ar ;1-4371-611-61 5 6 Y 5 31 .11/12/ 3.: P!NhEGASC9 NAT GAS 1 141:AT 11-4371-622-62 7 9. • 10 ° • •**-CKS 1$ 1 . ' . 12 '° 31P!47 11/12/1 73/.5: MN.VAL.GARDEN CEN. GENERAL SUPPLIES 01-4220-651-65 13 I , 11 737.51 • - m m ' I6 17 ' m a 1 31:33 L_____. _. 11L12.11U_______________-3.3..3.1A__________80.1108_P_ARSTS_______SHA 3182fic 21/12/8, 4.211 MOTOR FARIS 313346 01-4225-621-62 21 J. " 318!4f- 1:/1i/8'.: 2.52 MO1OR FARTS EQUIP. MAINT. J1-4230-421-42 ' " : I/ 1. 1/q, 7 1..)2 MOTOR PARTS -.- VEHICLE MA (NT . _ _ 61-4232-4n-4i 24 . " 1 1113qL 11/10P11 121.84 r.OTOR PARTS- VEHICLE MATNT. 81-4232-421-42 25 26 ) • :0 .1 232.52 * ! 27 • ,1 • 7.13 iriAA0e 31 - '1 . 11/ / '::2,.. , _ _ _3 2.10 ROBERT MCALLISTER OTHER PROF. SERVICES 01-4315-361-36 31 ... 350.16 * . 3 •( .r6 35 ) • . 47 _._ 331135 :1______ _11/13 La II __________5ML,311 .1411._811ELLE_R_&_SONS_ PAiLEIH_Q_MAIERIALS _IL1=125.1=827=i2 36 ' 20 546.30 . 37 ;( 4' ) ." -11 7r. at , !( ' 3111354 11/13/1:5 12.00 MYERS AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLE MAINT. 01-4232-421-42 14 47 3 ) 44 44 45 46 ) ■ *A. 4 • 4 •'-CKS . *7 JO itl ' 31: 11/13/3C 23.96 NW BELL TELEPHONE 01-4321-111-11 49 •(. 42 11/13/10 81.4 NW BELL - TELEPHONE 01-4321-121-12 1r 1 ._ .2.6...6.5_ NW_HELL - ILLEariaul althlaL711.1:1ft , " 11,1317 11/13/q; 44.01 KW EELL TELEPHONE 01-4321-151-15 57 14 310187 11/13/J 15.33 NW BELL TELEPHONE 01-4321-171-17 .?.. 1 3 1 '' "'A 7 11/13/ 60.78 NW 8 EL L TELEPHONE 01-4321-182-18 15n '" 318387 11/1 i/00 189.35 NW BELL ' TELEPHONE 31-4321-311-31 ;5. ( " 113 it 7 11/13/80 27.01 N4 BELL TELEPHONE 1'1-4321-331-33 59 1 TELIEWILE_ 0.14321-331-33 - 61 ---- 1 " 3111,17 11/1.1/8J 4.47 NW BELL TELEPHONE 01-4321-351-35 61 • 1( ' 318387 11/13/8: 47.'12 hW BELL TELEPHONE 01-4321-411-41 63 4 " 314117 11/11/A1 4. NW BELL TELEPHONE G1-4321-421-42 64 " 318387 11/13/81 37.16 NW BELL TELEPHONE 01-4321-421-42 65 66 '' 31113M7 11/13/00 16.20 NW BELL TELEPHONE 15-4321-191-19 67 ' : 51 60 ' ..' 69 1. . 70 i l -J.) t • • • , a ***-CKS 71 54 72 _ .- .... 31835 11/13/90 1. NW SERV.ST.EQUIP. ' EQUIP. MAINT. 31-4230-421-42 '73 . 74 56 I ' 131.58 . ... 1 - ?.... 1 . *-CKS I' " '. . u lft, 1`n' r|n �r Sx^C),'� ''_-� CHECK nE�IST�» • !! �ra��'__'?___' ` cnrc' ^'. c=/� • ',MOUNT VENDOR r/cx DESCRIPTION xccooxr ox. INV. x P.O. v MESSAGE ` -^ ^ ^ -- -_' _ -_ __ -_ ' ^ _ - -'-__ '__- _ _____-'_-_--_--_-_-__ - -- ___ | ! ^ 31842-i '` :1/131 337.5' HAROLD PAS MACHINERY o�wm ''I-43P2-121''I-43P2-121-12 � /-pz-^z�-^e " ' 31842-i ^ .3.J7.i. ^ ` ' ' - --'---- - ---- � - � -'- - ---------�| " 31843'.: 1I/13/,11 - 19,02 PEARSON FLORISTS MISC. o/-*9p-u/-11 " ~ " - ----_'_ • . -_-_-_-_--__--_--__ `" " . ^^^-m� ° .� ' ., `^ 31813 11/11/ 6e6.51 pxmx LAKE AGG. ICE CONT. om. a�-mw-�ne-^u - - -------- ° 626 ^ � '" | '^ '^ | '" ------�--- ----------------------- - ,-----' -- -----------------------''--- 20 ' ^^^-c,x "' .' 22 ' )|91\) 1l/1 - __-'--1,� 5 I"��-_____R�l�Q�DS_JELgJN _SUp��IF� -�L�����-�3�-1� 23 ., /,os?,o1 ^ ����-- --,— -- �---------- 2 . ~ =' 1 22 ^' --s1 : y � 2 -- _ - -�IL1 RICH I/wN CORP. cia^_�uI�LlEn 24=1�1�1fi x/.s� * = � ^a 1 " � ■ = ''--' �' ------- __-- .44�CKS _'__ ( ^ 3184r.4 11/13/.11 255,6e JOE RIES cowp,u SCHOOLS 01-4390-321-32 ' "� ) '1_ ^ __ � .16 � - '--_-_� -- - �� < ~ 31/14i'.5 11/1 122.3:4, HAROLD RING TRAVEL EXPENSE 61-*330-321-32 3J 1 � 31 u^� 5 11/13/1: 254.F3 __--_ ClNF. t SCHOOLS 11-±390-32i-32 � 376.99 • = ----- ' -----� -----� ^. ( �) ^^ __AlU1j�--__ _11/1 102 RING FIFE cXTo, E� 4 o 1�p^��wr. �z-�o-411-xl .123 . ~ 10e.50 ^ ------- ^ ( =) ~ 4 '-''� .*^-my_ ( ° 310174 11/12/3:: 12.25 DOUGLAS S. nEsuco cowr, S. SCHOOLS )1-4390-121-12 � 1 - l�,s ° _ = ° ^^^'cxs ~ ` ~ - -------- � -- _-'-_--__ ^' 3181/7 11/1. e90.94 xrcS PcxTms o1oo.w REP. �����i���o���x '---'---' 2.1 e90 ° � 50 ° ` 50 ^" ° __-_--- ,, ^^^-cxc 61 ° ? � �� _-- 24 . 5 C R.S.MEANS Bcnks - it - PAMPH� - -_ �������-���-�� - ' 63 � -._- 65 ' �. ^. 41141313 . 67 / ~ -- .~ 6c. |1 53 3181J:: 11/13/ 1.11_ SCOTT CTY. RECORDER pnzaTn.uxcpnon. 91-4351-141-14 � ` 54 -__ 4...1 l • _ 72 ` 5a1 ^^^-cxo • � L__- 7* -- ------ - --- `^ 31x 1:/13/`.: 17.4.) SCOTT CTY. TREASURER GENERAL SUPPLIES 31- ----------- °. | • . |. _ zF. Czn ■;: ::!f.1‘,.1: rn[cx 8Eo IsT - 7x 1171 3-u/- Pi? _E;c__-u • ' c x7m x�. u�r ' x�0x.n • orwoo� T n��cx�pr/um ACCOUNT NO. /ov. x P.O. * xcsc^:c ' ^ , ` 4 � /. ------- -- r - - -------'--- -- ----------------------------'-'---------'- -'-- ------� --____� ' " • �� ^ 5 ': ' " ^ ���� , -� - .. ' .' - - -- - - - --'-'- .- '. —' � ����[��_'--� . " `. f ^ 318513 11/1.!/'1.1 2.P.85 o*mo,cr xuwc. V�wcxx� SUPPLIES 11-4220-421-42 = �_3/u��L u.u�__-_--_- uxuc[cc-� uuc w cuu�—surpLIcu___'—_� ��4o2ocui 1 1 • � '" 3185:a 11/13/11 3.18 SHAKOPEE xuuc. GENERAL SUPPLIES ^ � -�xe�-au/��o '-'--------------- � ( x�,"� • ' 14 ., ., ., . ---____�_--__' '--__ I 1.1 ^ ° -c^^vs 15 / 13 --3 zu z z2z ��_—__— n oc ' _-_ GENIBAL o 220-633-63 ' = x '^ 5+0, • � !' 14 22 ." � 23 -'' -' _ -_--___�- - ' ' _ — ' _ - �� 25 i/ = 318518 318518 11/12/q.) 11/12/q.) 8,868,86.;34 a.� SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS LccxLwur pun. 11-4350-121-12 `' -�m�:e .�z/z�/�� _--���� xu�uo,r�_xx���x_mcu 27 � ^ 3135L ��/�u/`� , 28.67 SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS ��s«� NOT. pux. 01-4350-131-11 - _--_ _-- � - �ca4�_muz. - ��o^ - '_ ����y�u���zo�/u 3. " -------------' - -- / ( "" 318 1 - .11 11/12/81 18.49 xx^vrpcc VALLEY NEWS px/m7o. & xcpxnu. 11'43x1-111-11 = " ...11852,:: - . - 1i/1 �� /��'_-__'_ _--__ -_--�"�u'__--�__-shAhgpEc «ALL E2—�Eu ���D" -__�l��351=131-�� "` , ~ 3185.'8 11/12/1.) 18.50 SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS ` pxIm}o. & xcpxoo. 01-4351-171-17 33 ' - - --�------- -� / :' 318531857,11/13/11/13/811 �11/13/811 18906 SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS LEGAL NOT. PUB, 23-4350-419-41 34 � ^ _--31u _u -__ ���-_-��o�yx o uu �� �c�rr x����x �cI�_�z^_eue� " 318508 1//zz � /,� 1^767.67 SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS LEGAL NOT. Poo. 56-4350-911-01 37 --- Al; 37 ,,.7:( '^ 31856h li/12/vC 51.82 SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS LEGAL NOT. Pon. 58-4350-911-91 30 ^ ~ -_ -_--_----__�^���"�l_�_'___-_' _ � } ^. ��. • -_''' - _- - _ ___ --_-_-__- " ^^~^^` ^ ( . . ' ^^^ ° .----_-__-- - _- _-_�-- � ^^ 31ou 11/12/11 24.13 xy,osx DRUGS GENERAL SUPPLIES ���----- 58-4zc0-5 � 1 � - � � -------' -- ..--- -- ^" ' ( -m m.�/ • ° ° " . . ____ - -- -. --- _ ___ ____ --' ^^^-ms . `( -' ^ ~ ^` � -31au�u--_---//1z�/c: _ _-' znasrra _ n ����Es l l�1Jl5�1���l� = 2,780.25 ^ 0.-, ' ^. = ! ^ �-- l}u�1/ _---_LI/]��� �-___-------_��l4 ____ ELECTRICITY - I1:43g:Jy1-18 � ! '' sa s � / 11/12/66 284.81 SPUC - 'r • ELECTRICITY 3[-,3i0-182�18 ---------'-' ---------- ' /° 313517 11/i3/;33 203.58 SPUC ' ELECTRICITY �z-�zm-�u-�z 30 ~ ��a��z_---_-z/ ��^~ ' 00 ^ ^---�� �/� 11/13/.J -~ 19.5'. SPUC ELECTRICITY p�-�aZa�3z1�»a---------- --------- LT t. '" 318517 11/12/8: 4,17.16 SPUC . ELECTRICITY u-*370-421-1" , "" 4" '''' J|�51 /V - |�/��� ' - . _ 11-43707427-42 189"1 _ - __ SPVE __' _ _ LECT@JCI!? _ . . ��-��-���-�� | 318517 11/13/9J 90.32 SPUC cLccTx/c/n 01-4370-6i1-61 -- - '----- | :. ° 313517 11/1:/11 zn.z^ SPUC . ELECTRICITY oz-*zro-eue-uu ^u i 31 - 3/uo / / -' _-' 1 uu/su__--_--�_-_--zu.�s_--___--oeuc c��oc c��l_ 7x-_-___-_�-- O. 1.7.:_i �37a-ar5-6: � ~ 318517 11/12/16 A1.2. SPUC ELECTRICITY 11-4370-628-62 -------------- k. • � 318517 11/12/1: 2.1.01 SPUC MACHINERY RENTAL 11-4382-e3+62 70 ~ 31.:I).? 1Vi 11 �� - ��gc__�'__---__'-_'___Ag�JT cg��" vq-i930-51|-�� �' i z/x � � � 1uu � /� s,arj.�o SPUC xcxzr-urxco COLL• 83-4 930-911-e1 '----- ■ [l 0 ^47 .22 * ,, 73 :] � -_' . -.- -. - . . --. '--'-_ ,. 31851 11/1 3,4.16.25 �.�u.zn ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL OTHER PROF. SERVICES o1'^315-91/- ---'------ • .^ . t., .. I -1_ l ''' i • lel! (-H` 'r - 4v ^1 5 ,/ / - oiccx »q ' 11-11-o3 PA c ' , E -_- 9 ' -_-' � \ ^ 2 cxc/" �'. C^r `yno�r vE ITEM o cccxIprnm ACCOUNT O. INV. x P.O. n MESSAGE "+` .1 " , ^ --- . - — — ' ' � '- -----'---------'----- ------- --------------�----- - ------ ' '- -----'----------�� 1 31851A 11/11/I' 46..; SE. FRANCIS HonpITAL BLOOD TESTS ' fl-4425-313-31 51 ; , z.4rz^z9 * ~' ^ , | ' -' -- --'- -'--- '—� --------- ^ � | . •••-cx» | ." ( . " . --318522 -_ -- Uxun_CLLAuuN o _-_--'__OUa"_mu/uI2_1-81:e.-_--_' D._=oa3/=1o1: 1u: . _____ .'_ _____ _____ -_—__-__'_- s '" 31891 11/11//.1 n.:u STARS CLEANING BLDG. MAIN/. & REP. 01-4231-182-18 `" " 318517 11/1!/q: 17...::.) s/^«^s CLEANING BLDG. MA/w/. ^ REP. 7'1-1231-311-SL 13 '^ )o,5 �� , ���ii:: _—'-__-- l 3 " 9 DSIARKS CLEANING _-_--_--_- MAI@T,& _- ]- 4231 7131 - 1% --- _'_ _' - -____--_. _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 0 i ' ^ • `` / t4 .^ .. ^ `^� | '------'--------------- ---------' -'-- 4 �/■LK« .^ ./ '` s1x�2� 11/11/.::: 12.5 STEINS INC. souzp. oxIwr. 31-4230-4e1-42 • ' ----.-- � _--- ���i = • __--'_-_- 24 15 -_------' --- / = ^^^^^^ ^^^-cxs 26 . | • ^' 27 ' ' ~ -_-___'-___-____- -__-_-__-_� 318524 11/12/1Z 182.53 DON STREICHER GUNS GENERAL SUPPLIES •1-4220-312-31 = I( '^ 182.50 ^ - ) 24 . " amxzs 11/13/8 264.00 ENG. ^ 22-4312-196-19 �o suuoxoxN cwc 'ENGINEERING SER. ( ^ 318925 11/1 7500 SUBURBAN ENG. ENGINEERING ocx56-431256-4312-911-91 v� 3.2 ) "�—_______-__--_' 111�u� • __ _ : 2u . ' " 1 ( ^" 318516 11/17.0'1 25.58 SUEL BUSINESS EQUIP. OFFICE SUPPLIES 31-4210-121-12 " ) ' 3l:s�� � - �i/�/z L��s_ - ____ 01-4210- l% 3-12= '' 318526 11/13/80 3.75 SUEL BUSINESS EQUIP. OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-131-13 41 ( " umsao 11/13/* ,67 SUEL BUSINESS souIp, OFFICE xoppL 01-4210-111-14 = = ) ^ __31o5,25_...._'._.1 LL o/uL_ _ _M.S.UIEsa__E_Qu.La" opE1Cc svEIELL� ��2.1.D:1151-15 ^^ ° 318i76 11/1i/81 46.31 SUEL ouuIwcss EQUIP. OFFICE SUPPLIES v1-*ezu-u1-31 45 ( ~ 318:1,: 11/12/31 25./6 SUEL BUSINESS EQUIP. OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-4e1-42 ° ) • 31P51c 11 /1 2 /1 1 34.13 SUEL EQUlP.MAINT.&REP. 11-4230-151-15 152'61 • ^" / ~ =. °31U52lll�����i � .»s _-_ so�cx*�c«rcx n��/c� o��L�����L��I� ~ 22 = 31.19'7 11/12/11 10.45 soFcxxxsnzcx GENERAL noppLIcx -11-^eoo-311-z1 53 ` " 118527 11/121:1) en."a ouFcx^,cxzcx • MOTOR FUELS&LUBRIC. 01-4222-312-31 = / ^" ���'l7� �--- --___--- 8.55SUFERAFERlCA LUBRlC.] � ^~ 79.61 * � � -----� (~ 5 7: ) ~ 3185 1,I70.60 x.L.SHIcL, co. ROAD MATERIALS 01-4240-42Z-42 ° 1,/�o.�o ^ � 1 ( ^ " ) ^ . ^^ ^^ � 49 '-'-' -'�-------.-- ---------------- —__-__--_-_ - - -- ' ���:� ( `" 318531 11/11/1, 22.53 SHAKOPEE OIL � VEHICLE MAINT. x�-+ezz-��z-�� = ) ~ __�� 5 ��- ���� _��i �������C ' ° _-_ . " 1 �a • -_'-_ 29. 60 `" = = • '. � ' - � - __-_------___- - __ �� ��� _-_ � 73 ( ''' zmsm 11/11/x3 33.77 SAND MECHANICAL BLDG. wxIwT. 01-4e30-183-16 74 / `Z�_--J1D 53d.___'-_Lii LIZ 4 1 34.5n SAND xEcuxwrcxL ` BLDG. Mx/NT. 31-4231.121-12 ,' c».x/ ~ ` ` .. . . . ' | . /• 1`1. -...:Ty ,' x'/`vx,' cx�cK �� :T�/ , « l�-��-�� �� l3 ^ � __� ~ " u/cx o. o�c Amowr xE^n'n ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT xo. /uv. n P.n. o MESSAGE ` , ^ ------- ---' __-____---__-______-_'_-'__'_ __-_-_____-'____---_-___�__-__ / , . ^ 6 rxs 4 ~^^' , ' - '- � ' — ' ----- --- '-'-----'--' -' e ` 3:9'11 11/1e..: 1:3.30 . TAYLOR RENTAL MACHINERY xcmTx1 01-4302-6e1-62 '---------- ' ° 133.83 • ° . ' 12 II . "^ 31'195, z /// !/`� 15.31 TELEDYNE POST OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-411-41 --- '" 11 '195,3 • ^ 14 ". ." . ' -- -- -__-_________ _ -_--_-__-'_--'__ � ---____ _'- -.'----___- ^°"-cxs " � , f .^ `" ``__31u5u n -_ Iuz=S_zouzma __- ozuEo-2uor^_xcuuIcc�.___2�=�zzu=ozz�u1-___--__' = '^ e9,10 * a ( ., 22 '^ ' ' ' - - --- --------''-'------------ - -----'-- ---'------ _----_'_---' _ -'_ -'__ __- "1 �1CuS� ( ' 318916 11/12/60 32.31 o OF M cowr, & SCHOOLS 01-4390-411-41 = ^■ ^_----__-_-__ - ��.��-�- __-_ � --___--_--____- � 72 / 2: ' 310 11/1!/ su.u0 U.S. POSTMASTER pFrIcc surpL/eu 01-4210-311-31 = � ��`��� _--- _-'-__-_�'-- ' __ ,` � 2* � �� �� - _- -__--_� -__-_ �� ^< � 31031011/13/3 ^ �s ��//m n� vo UNTFORMS UNLIMITED :I. � ' � ', � ��oTx�ao-pcx-cuo�p. nz-^aza-s/u-�� 35 --- ----_-- _ sx^�� • � � ___- 36 .tel -- ---__' 37 ( '" "" ° ^^^'cKn = / ^ --- !( ax3111511 11/13/10 10.7e VALLEY IND. PROPANE ^ MOT, rosLnuLmM, 31-4e22-311-31 -------------- �xx�1 ���/"� 380.3e VALLEY IND. PROPANE MOT. pocLnxLoo. 01-*e22-4e1-42 ^" ^' 3185•111/13/9) ' _ _ / ^ -_-31uy2s-_ ��1z/ 3..1..3..1..32.1 __VA/ /cv rmu�-£uzu��ms ' p^ruzNcux-�cmIxL ___-_-- �.z=1/�u-a11-o1 ° � ~ ��os/� 11/13/2,.. 61,71 VALLEY IND. PROPANE MACHINERY RENTAL 01-4382-421-42 ---' k ^" 403.71 • � ^^ , ~ / = --_' -- -_ ^' __-__-_' - _-_ _-__ _ - ' '_-_----'_- - ^^^-cvs = ^. ~ r1 ; 4 ~ _��o�___�4���� � ��_ ���� » -���__ 4.) 123.R2 • - __-- ' � � ^. = i ~" 444644 55 J -'---------------�---- ----'----' ----- ------'---- -'--'-------' '-' - - - '-- ������� 1 ^ ^ - ^ . amc. 11/13/0t1 16.80 GREGG voxL»mu • ' TRAVEL EXPENSE 01-4330-151-15 = ' ''''..__'111161a______11/12/.11.11_ --_-- �.�s__' noEaa_uuuLu�» cnw��-K-��uyO��-__-___-;)1 -__' � 4a. 31116.... 1 :/12/90 23'55 GREGG VOXLAND CONF. & SCHOOLS 91-4390-151-15 ------' ---'---� ` ^ 31116.... 318.010 11/13/10 - • 23.55- GREGG voxL»wn CCNF. & SCHOOLS 11-13vo-1s1-15 ^` ' - 2l,55A ° :" . ` 'o ^ ^^^^ ^ ^°^-cxo = ` \ 5, ~ ^ .^ ___�_-___ ______ __ __ �_ ___�- -____ 58 31x625 /u13/.'. 136.15 WEBER o ^ MAINT.&REP. - -�u TROSETH cno�p ex/w� uxcp ��-*exu �e� ------------ ----� I,. ", 136.15 ^ `" ,` _____' 72 ���� ��� '- -_ - _ - - ' ____-___-_' ' • ^^ ^^ ^ ," ` ` �,. ,^~-cxx 74 v�__zzuc��--'_- u/zz/�a ucuuu_Eu82,' � o[EILLcu�zEA-�ENIAL___gz��Ju�� � x,», ^ F . ^' ' . /u i'l • �. } i' r[l^ =,, �p^`"' .. cxFcx �=5[sT'� 1}-«37x� !'.APE .. _1.1......___ ~ ' c*F:~ N' r ^n ^pou�r vcm,n ,/ o DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT xo r"v o p : 0 MESSAGE ! � ` ' c . , P.O. , L — �� -- ^ -----'----'---- ' ' -'- ----'- '---'----'--'-'---' ---� ' ----- '-- • " - ••^'cxx " , —. , . ' - .- . ' _--_.___ - , . ' _ 31i1,70 .5 /u/s �59.2:: . ' ZEP MFG xcwnAL SUPPLIES 31-4220-622-n2 /( 0 59 .zo • � � | . . " ' � __-_�___'- __-_--____'-_--_-_-_ _-_--____- ■ � _--_--_-_-' � _-_- 12 • xmCiA 1'../17/.i": 481•')5 zxcaxor VEHICLE xxIomxcp. 31-4232-312-31 '` / 11 *m.95 ^ _ 14 .^ 10 M ' 318655 11/11./41 73.44 z/ca ����������f����p� --- �����u�-�ei-�� '- � -- --- 17 ( 14 73.44 • • � ` '" • • 19 20 ." .. ^..^ -_ °^•-cxo 21 ( `` 47.662.t FUND 01 TOTAL 22: ) / '^ 25 . 35 _----'_- F�&U1 5 TOTAL _-_ _ . - ' -- --' � - - ' '~ 280.24 FUND 22 TOTAL ____ '_ - � - ------------ �( ^ ' 216.46 FUND e? TOTAL "^ ) '. • ' � _-- 26 — 23 1 FUND 56 TOTAL 29 ( 518.85 FUND 58 TOTAL = ) | ^^ 4.: _���=���y�U_�l��� --- ^' = a,xoo.00 �u�o 83 TOTAL �. ------ ---------'--- 1 ~3 . / nx�� �L� ' �� '----�-- -- 36 ...s 37 ( 2" 3 / 344 3: ' | .. - - ----'--------� ` -------------------�- �' ---- --' '-- -------' = ( 44 ° ..-., �) 4.s � . -_-_- ^, .( JU = • ° "1 ---- ------------- ------------- ---- --- - ------'' -- '------� ( "J ' ~ / . ,. . 40 52 _-- — ' 53 ' °' ~ ) | 42 � ---_-----_� _ - e� - 57 y 49 } ~ ' � | ^ _-____-- ` __- - ' � ^ 61 ( ) = � '_- '__ _----'-- ___--____'—__ = --- 4.3 � _-'---� -_--. — |( `j • = ) ! :.1 � � . = -_ '- ---__-----_ --'_� 69 :� � 70 ! 71 � � .. _______`, ~ `" ' 74 • .) ''.1---- . .� ' .. 73 _--_ -- ' ' __- ,^ /` � 1 Oct. '80 -Page 7 bEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR CK.AMT. CK.NO. VOID 6744 VOID 6745 VOID 6746 01.4100.311.31 01.1010 475.26 Salaries -F.T. Janet M. Witkowski 475.26 6747 01.4100.121.12 01.1010 2,164.58 Salaries -F.T. Douglas S. Reeder 2,164.58 • 6748 11.4315.811.81 11.1010 252.00 Other Prof.Service Brenda Achter 252.00 6749 11.4980.811.81 11.1010 50.00 Refund - Gymnastics Gary Anderson 50.00 6750 11.4315.811.81 11.1010 66.50 Other Prof.Service Craig Brandvold 66.50 6751 11.4394.811.81 11.1010 732.80 Books & Pamphlets Carver -Scott Cooperative 732.80 6752 11.4315.811.81 11.1010 102.00 Other Prof.Service JoAnn Geis 102.00 6753 11.4315.811.81 11.1010 41.85 Other Prof.Service Amy Gohdes 41.85 6754 11.4231.811.81 11.1010 1,995.00 Bldg. Maint. ,',Jefferson Carpentry 1,995.00 6755 t 11.4315.811.81 11.1010 102.00 Other Prof.Service Roger Knudson 102.00 6756 11.4315.811.81 11.1010 17.00 Other Prof.Service Al Lebens 17.00 6757 11.4330.811.81 11.1010 40.04 Travel Expense Mark McQuillan 40.04 6758 11.4220.811.81 11.1010 32.30 General Supplies Midwest Badge 32.30 6759 11.4371.811.81 11.1010 4.31 Gas Stmt. Minnegasco 4.31 6760 11.4390.811.81 11.1010 88.00 Schools & Conf. MN Recreation & Park Assn 88.00 6761 • 11.4321.811.81 11.1010 95.10 Telephone Stmt. Northwestern Bell 95.10 6762 11.4315.811.81 11.1010 68.00 Other Prof.Service Mary Jo O'Brien 68.00 6763 11.4315.811.81 11.1010 55.00 Other Prof.Service Annette Rider 55.00 6764 11.4220.811.81 11.1010 4.03 General Supplies Robert Drug 4.03 6765 11.4315.811.81 11.1010 68.00 Other Prof.Service Carol Schneider 68.00 6766 Oct. '80 -Page 8 DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR . CK.AMT. CK.NO. 11.4315.811.81 11.1010 102.00 Other Prof.Service Marion Schmidt 102.00 6767 11.4351.811.81 11.1010 6.00 Prtg. & Repro. City of Shakopee 74.02 6768 11.4222.811.81 11.1010 68.02 Motor Fuels; n n " 11.4315.811.81 11.1010 102.00 , Other Prof.Service Nancy Sortum 102.00 6769 i 11.4394.811.81 11.1010 66.66 Books & Pamphlets South - Western Publishing 66.66 6770 11.4230.811.81 11.1010 85.25 Equip. Maint. Suel Business 87.05 6771 11.4210.811.81 11.1010 1.80 Office Supplies " " 11.4320.811.81 11.1010 30.00 Postage U.S. Postmaster 30.00 6773 11.4315.811.81 11.1010 148.75 Other Prof.Service Barbara Swenson 148.75 6772 11.4220.811.81 11.1010 40.43 General Supplies Valley Sports 40.43 6774 01.4362.321.32 01.1010 191.00 Vehicle Insurance Capesius Agency 191.00 6775 22.4315.196.19 22.1010 249.031, Other Prof.Service Von Klug & Associates 249.03 6776 01.4330.141.14 01.1010 50.00 Travel Expense Larry Martin 50.00 6777 23.4509.419.41 23.1010 95,022.00 Capital -Other Pittsburgh -Des Moines 95,022.00 6778 81.4931.911.91 81.1010 610.00 Payroll Svgs. 1st Natl- Shakopee 610.00 6779 01.4232.421.42 01.1010 190.78 Vehicle Maint. Battery & Tire Whse. 190.78 6780 56.4980.403.41 56.1010 4.58 Refund - Holmes St. John L. Ries 4.58 6781 81.4923.911.91 81.1010 4,802.45 PERA Withholding PERA 4,802.45 6783 01.4982.911.91 01.1010 40.33 Taxes - Library Scott County Treasurer 40.33 6782 81.4920.911.91 81.1010 6,618.00 Federal Withholding 1st Natl.- Shakopee 6,618.00 6784 VOID 6785 Oct. '80-Page 9 DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR CK.AMT. CK.NO. 81.4921.911.91 81.1010 5,174.23 State Withholding Comm. of Revenue 5,174.23 6786 81.4922.911.91 81.1010 6,153.48 FICA Withholding Dept. of Personnel 6,153.48 6787 83.4929.911.91 83.1010 3,411.09 Surcharge State Treasurer 3,411.09 6788 01.4321.311.31 01.1010 32.90 Telephone NW Bell 32.90 6789 $129,654.55 $129,654.55 Fund Totals 01- General Fund $ 3,144.85 11 -Joint Recreation 4,464.84 • 22 -4th and Minn. 249.03 - { 23 -K -Mart 95,022.00 81- Payroll Trust 23,358.16 83- Utility Trust 3,411.09 56 -80 -A Imp. 4.58 $129,654.55 } Nov. '80 -Page 1 DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR _ CK.AMT. CK.NO. 01.4242.421.42 01.1010 48,533.81 Seal Coating Black Top Service Co. - 48,533.81 6790 56.4519.403.41 56.1010 312,974.30 Other Improve.,. . Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. 312,974.30 6791 56.4519.911.91 56.1010 2,339.53 Other Improve. Orfei & Sons, Inc. 2,339.53 6792 23.4519.419.42 23.1010 29,450.00 Other Improve. Crowley Fence Co., Inc. 29,450.00 • 6793 01.4231.183.18 01.1010 996.95 Install Door Ken's Steel Door Repair 996.95 6794 01.4320.411.41 01.1010 7.01 Petty Cash City of Shakopee 43.87 6795 01.4320.321.32 01.1010 4.65 It " It It t' 01.4320.121.12 01.1010 2.04 " if t' 't st 01.4396.331.33 01.1010 3.75 " " " It it 01.4396.123.17 01.1010 4.00 " " tt it it 01.4230.621.62 01.1010 2.50 ti It tt 01.4220.651.65 01.1010 .49 " " " it 01.4220.111.11 01.1010 2.18 " 'i 11.4396.811.81 11.1010 2.25 " " tt tt tt 01.4232.321.32 01.1010 3.00 " " It It It 01.4232.141.14 01.1010 6.00 " " " t' tt 01.4232.411.41 01.1010 6.00 tt u u 01.4320.121.12 01.1010 500.00 Postage U.S. Postmaster 500.00 6796 81.4923.911.91 81.1010 4,633.82 PERA Withh. PERA 4,633.82 6797 81.4920.911.91 81.1010 5,294.83 Remit -FIT 1st Natl- Shakopee 5,294.83 6798 81.4931.911.91 81.1010 610.00 Payroll Svgs. 1st Natl- Shakopee 610.00 6799 01.4222.421.42 • 01.1010 8,353.20 Motor Fuels Wood River Oil Co. 8,353.20 6800 71.4411.911.91 71.1010 30,260.42 ' Current Use. • Metro. Waste Control 36,782.04 6801 71.4412.911.91 71.1010 6,521.62 Reserve Cap. II 11 " 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 52.50 Election Judge Gladys Theis 52.50 6802 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 28.50 Election Judge Bonnie Notermann 28.50 6803 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 32.25 Election Judge Ruth O'Reilley 32.25 6804 ti 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 24.00 Election Judge Judy Ess 24.00 6805 Nov. '80 -Page 2 DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR CK.AMT. CK.NO. 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 45.00 Election Judge Susan Niewind 45.00 6806 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 46.50 _ Election Judge Ethel Schneider 46.50 6807 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 • 40.50 Election Judge Marcilla Schmidt 40.50 6808 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 46.50 Election Judge Evelyn Love 46.50 ' 6809 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 40.50 Election Judge Marie Nigg 40.50 6810 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 18.00 Election Judge Sally Juba 18.00 6811 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 31.50 Election Judge Virgilla Geske 31.50 6812 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 29.25 Election Judge Maureen Adams 29.25 6813 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 30.75 Election Judge Rita Steinhoff 30.75 6814 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 29.25 Election Judge Mary Lou Kaley 29.25 6815 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 29.25 Election Judge Lillian Kopisca 29.25 6816 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 29.25 Election Judge Thea May 29.25 6817 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 29.25 Election Judge Joan Hart 29.25 6818 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 42.00 Election Judge Winnie Anderson 42.00 6819 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 23.25 Election Judge Ann Notermann 23.25 6820 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 29.25 Election Judge Rudy Maurine 29.25 6821 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 23.25 Election Judge Dean Obernolte 23.25 6822 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 23.25 Election Judge Donald Clemens 23.25 6823 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 28.50 Election Judge Paulette Rislund 28.50 6824 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 25.50 Election Judge Lois Kubes 25.50 6825 01.4315.131.13 01..1 40.50 Election Judge Beryl Barrett 40.50 6826 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 43.50 Election Judge Marvel Siebenaler .. _ er . 4 3.50 6827 Nov.. '8U -Page 3 DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR _ CK.AMT. CK.NO. 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 40.50 Election Judge Hazel Bisek 40.50 6828 01_4315.131.13 01.1010 21.00 Election Judge Joanne Davis 21.00 6829 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 21.00 Election Judge Carolyn Nevin 21.00 6830 , 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 21.00 Election Judge June Regan 21.00 6831 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 40.50 Election Judge Marilyn Johnson 40.50 6832 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 27.00 Election Judge Willard Bongard 27.00 6833 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 21.00 Election Judge Candy Kragthorpe 21.00 6834 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 27.00 Election Judge Mary Ann Mertz 27.00 6835 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 42.00 Election Judge Barbara Runge 42.00 6836 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 21.00 Election Judge Connie Berens 21.00 683' 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 21.00 Election Judge JoAnn Kruger 21.00 6838 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 71.75 Election Judge Carol Bishop 71.75 6839 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 77.00 Election Judge Gail R. Kelso 77.00 6840 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 41.25 Election Judge Marie Kocks 41.25 6841 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 40.50 Election Judge Kathryn Marschall 40.50 6842 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 41.25 Election Judge Lucille Odenwald 41.25 6843 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 27.00 Election Judge Talida Nolting 27.00 6844 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 40.50 Election Judge Marilyn Lang 40.50 6845 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 58.50 Election Judge Bernice Mottinger 58.50 6846 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 42.00 Election Judge Linda Mankowski 42.00 6847 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 40.50 Election Judge Rosemary Huss 40.50 6848 ' ' ' Nov. 7 80- Page 4 i DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR CK.AMT. CK.NO. 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 21.00 Election Judge Sally Herzog 21.00 6849 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 27.00 Election Judge Hildy Linehan 27.00 6850 1 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 19.50 Election Judge Bernadette Gerlach 19.50 6851 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 27.00 Election Judge Marvis Ficker _ 27.00 6852 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 15.00 Election Judge Loretta Jaspers 15.00 6853 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 15.00 Election Judge Janet Matlock 15.00 6854 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 27.00 Election Judge June Sebald 27.00 6855 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 21.00 Election Judge H.L. Weinandt 21.00 6856 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 30.00 Election Judge LeVaun Schmitt 30.00 6857 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 39.00 Election Judge Harriet Bartyzal 39.00 6858 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 21.00 Election Judge Phyllis Schesso 21.00 6859 01.4315.131.13 01.1010 21.00 Election Judge Dean Trutnau 21.00 6860 24.4509.192.19 24.1010 365.70 Capital -Other AVVR 365.70 6861 71.4980.911.91 71.1010 116.55 Refunds Bjorklund Trucking 116.55 6862 01.4222.421.42 01.1010 103.09 Motor Fuel /Lub. Consodel, Inc. 103.09 6863 83.4980.911.91 83.1010 3.95 Refund Domestic Heating 3.95 6864 01.4315.121.12 01.1010 24.70 Other Prof. Ser. Donald D. Dahlstrom. M.D. 24.70 6865 22.4517.196.19 22.1010 2,154.32 Watermain Con. Erickson Constr. Inc. 9,229.44 6866 II 41.4517.911.91 41.1010 7,075.12 " It II 01.4511.621.62 01.1010 8,996.00 Capital- Equip. Edwin Johnson Corp. 8,996.00 6867 01.4321.111.11 01.1010" 7.25 Telephone John G. Leroux 41.25 6868 01.4390.111.11 01.1010 34.00 Conf. & Schools It " II 01.4250.321.32 01.1010 134.00 Signs /Striping • Jim Link 134.00 6869 Nov. '80 -Page 5 DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR' CK.AMT. • CK.N0. 01.4382.311.31 01.1010 208.00 Machinery Rent. Malkerson Leasing Co. 208.00 6870 01.4232.421.42 01.1010 367.28 Vehicle Main. /Rep. Midland Equip. Co. 367.28 6871 01.4230.111.11 01.1010 8.00 Equip. Main. /Rep. Mike's Riverside T.V. & App. 8.00 6872 01.4392.421.42 01.1010 16.00 Licenses State of Minn. 16.00 . 6873 • 01.4394.311.31 01.1010 40.00 Books Pamphlets State of Minn. 40.00 6874 56.4312.403.41 56.1010 4,021.54 Engineering Ser. MN Valley Surveyors 4,021.54 6875 15.4391.191.19 15.1010 10.00 Dues & Subscript. MN Assn. of Urban Mgmt. 10.00 6876 01.4394.141.14 01.1010 19.95 Books & Pamphlets Nat'l Assn. of Ind. Fee Appr. 19.95 6877 01.4390.111.11 01.1010 45.00 Conf. & Schools Eldon Reinke 45.00 6878 01.4232.312.31 01.1010 50.00 Vehicle Main. /Rep. Rick's Auto Repair 50.00 6879 83.4980.311.31 83.1010 9.85 Refund Ryan Air Conditioning 9.85 6880 01.4330.411.41 01.1010 40.32 Travel Expense Fulton Schleisman 40.32 6881 83.4980.911.91 83.1010 3.50 Refund Dale Sorenson Co. 3.50 6882 01.4210:411.41 01.1010 3.96 Office Supplies The Tole Bridge 3.96 6883 01.4330.151.15 01.1010 89.60 Travel Expense Linda J. Willemssen 89.60 6884 $476,388.53 $476,388.53 Fund ,Totals 01- General Fund $ 70,541.23 56 -80 -A Improvement $ 319,335.37 11 -Joint Rec. Fund 2.25 71 -Sewer Fund 36,898.59 15 -HRA 10.00 81- Payroll Trust 10,538.65 22 -4th & Minn. 2,154.32 83- Utility Trust 17.30 23 -K -Mart 29,450.00 24- Elderly Hi -Rise 365.70 41 -PIR Fund . 7,075.12 Grand Total $ 476,388.53 MEMO TO: Thomas Brownell, Acting City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Fire Service Agreement DATE: November 12, 1980 We have been in the process of modifying the fire service agreement with the townships. The proposed modifications are: 1. Clarification language of City responsibility when unable to respond. 2. Standby fee based on actual cost as opposed to budget. 3. Including mobile home value in the base for deter- mining proportional. share of costs. 4. Making townships responsible for uncollectable bills in their jurisdiction. Number 3 would raise Jackson's fee by about $900 and Louisville's fee by about $100. Number 4 would cost each township about $500. I have had no response to date from Jackson and Louisville is in agreement except for number 4. They do not want complete responsi- bility for their uncollectables. The direction I would like from Council is: A. Is the City willing to keep absorbing the Township's uncollectables. B. Are we willing to absorb 1/2 of the uncollectables. C. Are we not willing to absorb any of their uncollect- ables and will terminate the contract to back up that position. The standby fee for each township is about $7000. In the event of "C" their option is to absorb the uncollectables �r terminate the contract and seek fire service elsewhere. GV /jms FIRE SERVICE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT Made and entered into this day of , :L9 , by and between the City of Shakopee, a Municipal Corporation in Scott County, Minnesota, and the Township of _ , a governmental subdivision in Scott County, Minnesota, lying adjacent to the City of Shakopee. WHEREAS, The said Township deems it advisable to have avail- able for the benefit of the residents of the said Township, services of the Fire Department of the City of Shakopee, and the electors of said Township have, pursuant to law, provided a fund for the estab- lishment of such service, and WHEREAS, The City of Shakopee has, by appropriate action, authorized its Mayor and its City Administrator to enter into a • contract with the said Township of , for the purpose of furnishing such fire service. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE SAID CITY OF SHAKOPEE AND THE SAID TOWNSHIP OF , That, for a period of time as hereinafter set out, the Fire Department of the City of Shakopee will answer any and all fire calls for any area within said Township and will respond to such calls, with suitable fire- fighting apparatus manned by at least three members of the Shakopee Fire Department who will render all assistance possible in the saving and preservation of life and property within said Township during the life of this contract. IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, HOWEVER, Between the parties hereto that at times, weather and road conditions through the various seasons of the year and reasons or causes beyond the control of the City and its Fire Department may interfere with rendering the service described herein. In the event thereof, the failure the Department to furnish the described service shall not be considered a break of this agreement and the City shall not be held liable on account thereof. However, the Department agrees to make a reasonable effort to secure alternate fire fighting/ rescue services from a surrounding community. -2- In consideration of said services, the Township of _ agrees to pay a stand -by fee to the City of Shakopee for such services each year during the life of this contract. The stand -by fee for the year starting will be $ For subsequent years, the stand -by fee shall be Township's proportionate share of the costs of operating the City of Shakopee's Fire Department for that calendar year. Such costs will include the costs included in the City of Shakopee's General Fund Budget (less any salaries to be paid for actual fire calls and less any expenses for motor fuels and lubricants) and the Debt Service costs related to the Fire Department. The stand -by fee will be determined on the basis of Township's assessed valuation before the fiscal disparities distribution plus mobile home valuation. The assessed valuation before the fiscal disparities distribution plus mobile home valuation of all covered units of • government's percentage share of the total will be determined. The stand- by for _ _ _ Township will be its Township's percentage times the total costs as described above. For the year starting March 1, 1980, the total costs shall be the costs contained in approved 1980 General Fund Budget for the City of Shakopee and the approved 1979/1980 payable levy for the Fire Department Debt Service. The assessed and mobile home value shall be the 1979/1980 payable assessed value before the fiscal disparities distribution as determined by the Scott County Auditor. For subsequent years, the appropriate budget year, levy and assessed value will be used in determining the stand -by fee. Annually, the preliminary calculation of the stand -by fee shall be as provided for above. The semi - annual payments to be made by the township shall be determined by using the preliminary calculation and shall be made as set forth herein. At the close of the City's fiscal year, and upon completion of the annual audit, the actual cost operating the Fire Department shall be determined, as set out herein, and the required monetary adjustment to the stand -by fee to reflect the actual cost shall be made at the due date of the next annual stand -by fee installment, or as soon thereafter as practical. -3- 7-12' The Township of wi.1.l pay the stand -by fee in two equal installments. For the year starting March 1, 1980, the payments will be due on September 1, 1980 and March 1, 1981. For subsequent years, the payments will be made on September 1st and March 1st of the appropriate years. The stand -by fee for each subsequent year will be determined in January by the City of Shakopee's Treasurer and notice of the stand -by fee will be mailed to the Township of As a further and additional consideration, the City of Shakopee will bill the owner of record the sum of $165.00 per hour for each fire call. The minimum bill for a fire call will be $165.00. The rate of $165.00 per hour will be used during the year beginning March 1, 1980, and will be adjusted in subsequent years by the City of Shakopee as fuel and salaries are adjusted. (False alarms will be charged to the Township at the same minimum and hourly rate). In the event payment has not been received by the City of Shakopee' within 90 days following the mailing of a third notice on a fire call billing, the Township of shall be responsible and shall remit to the City of Shakopee within 90 days of notice the amount of the charges due for fire calls within its boundaries. Furthermore, the Township of hereby assumes responsibility of outstanding fire call bills since March 1, 1978, under the provisions above. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT, as a further consideration for this agreement, the Township of for itself and its inhabitants will defend and hold the City of Shakopee harmless from any and all claims, actions or causes of action that might or could arise by virtue of the terms of this agreement and any failure, omission or malperformance hereunder. IT IS FURTHER MUTUALLY AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that this contract is considered as an amendment to the contract dated and that written six month notice under the former contract is waived. -4- IT IS FURTHER MUTUALLY AGREED, by and between the parties hereto that this contract shall continue to be in force and effect unless ° either party serves the other party with a written notice on cancella- tion six months prior to time the cancellation is to become effective. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, The City of Shakopee has caused this instrument to be executed by its Mayor and its Administrator by action of the City Council of the City of Shakopee; and the Township of has caused this instrument to be executed by authority of its Township Board by its Chairman and its Clerk.. In the Presence of: CITY OF SHAKOPEE, A MUNICIPAL CORP. by Its Mayor by Its Administrator (SEAL) In the Presence of: TOWNSHIP OF by Its Chairman by Its Clerk MEMO TO: Thomas G. Brownell, Acting City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, Deputy City Clerk RE: I.R. Bond Issues Limited DATE: November 14, 1980 On November 8, 1978 the Council adopted a policy procedure for commercial and industrial revenue bonds which calls for a limit of 25% of assessed value. According to Gregg Voxland's memo of November 5, the City's assessed value for 1980 is $59,618,887. Should the Council approve the application from Progress Valley Park (Jim O'Neill warehouses) and for S & W Realty (Shakopee Shops) on December 2, 1980, we will just about reach our 25 %. St. Francis Hospital is also applying for $9,120,000 IR Bonds. If the City wishes to consider the application, the current limit of 25% of assessed value needs to be adjusted upward. Action: Move to amend the November 8, 1978 IR Bond policy procedure to read The total aggregate amount of industrial development bonds and /or exempt mortgages outstanding at any one time shall not exceed % of the total assessed (taxable) valuation of the City." JSC /jms • _ n C • MEMO TO: Thomas Brownell, Acting City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: IR Bond Issues DAM: November 5, 1980 The policy for issuance of IR Bonds in Lho City calls for a limit of 25% of assessed value. Council has previously directed that the policy and application be rewri Lten and a higher l:im:i L incor- porated. The attachment shows what issues have been approved and those in process. The assessed value of the City for. 1980 is $59,618,887. The fee schedule as adopted is $1.,000 for the first million and 1/2 of 1% for the balance of 1 million. Some of the rational behind this is that it is to compensate the City for potential problems that could arise if these large issues defaulted. Although the City is not directly liable, the City's name is on the issue and a default would have a negative psychological impact on the market. Also, the larger issue realizes a signifi- cant benefit from the lower interest costs by having the City's name on the issue and this is a means for the City to share in some of the benefit. GV /jms attachment • 1 INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS OUTSTANDING Preliminary Da Le Of Firm Approval. Issuance Amount Valley Park, Inc. (Valleyfa ir) Series 1976 $ 1,000,000 Toro Series 1975 $ 2,100,000 Certain Teed Series 1973 $ 1,000,000 Perkins Steak & Cake Feb. of 1980 $ 600,000 Ziegler, Inc. Dec. of 1979 $ 2,300,000 Scottland Warehouse Feb. of 1980 $ 1,000,000 K -Mart Store Dec. of 1979 • $ 1,000,000 Ashland Oil Feb. 5, 1980 $ 1,000,000 J & B Enterprises $ 600,000 Citizens Bank Building July 29, 1980 $ 1,300,000 Progress Valley Park $ 2,400,000 (4 warehouses) SL. Francis Hospital 9,000,000 S & W Realty - Shakopee $ 600,000 Shops $23,900,000 11/,$3/78' Adopted CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA POLICY, CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT BOND APPLICATIONS I. GENERAL POLICIES - SHAKOPEE The Cicy of Shakopee has been granced the power co issue revenue bonds commonly called Industrial Developmenc Bonds by che Miinnesoca Industrial Developmenc Acc, Ch. 474, Minnesota Scacuces (che "Acc "). The Shakopee City Council, being aware chac such financing may be advantageous co the Cicy of Shakopee and may help achieve che overall developmenc and employment goals of che Cicy, has expressed its supporc for che use of such bonds -but has reserved che night co approve or reject projects on a case basis caking into consideration che following factors: a. The induscrial or commercial project shall be compatible wich che.overall developmenc plans and objectives of che Cicy and of the neighborhood in which che projecc shall lie. b. The projecc shall be of a nature chac che City wishes co accracc, or an existing business che City wishes co have expand within the Cicy con- sidering pocencial for employment, incenc.ive for further development, impact on Cicy service needs and supporc for induscrial or commercial operations currently located in che Cicy. • -2- c. The cocal aggregate amount of industrial developmenc bonds and /or exempc mortgages outstanding ac any one time shall not exceed 25% of che cocal assessed (taxable) valuation of che Cicy. 4 d. Tax exempc mortgage financing will be allowed as an alternative co bond financing but will be subject co the same policy, rules, and regulacions. e. The application cannot be considered by che Cicy Council until the Cicy Council finds chac che projecc is in accordance with che exiscing comprehensive planning, zoning, platting and building regulacions. f. The applicants proposed facilicy, or expansion of an exiscing one, shall provide a significant number of new jobs within che City. g. The applicanc shall select qualified financial consultants and /or underwriters as well as legal counsel co prepare all necessary documents and materials. h. The applicanc must not commence any parc of che construction of che projecc uncil chere has been preliminary approval by the Council of che appl.i cation for financing. -3- d'v i. The Cicy is co be reimbursed and held harmless, for and from any coscs refaced co che actual or proposed issuance of bonds or cax exempt mortgages ac che time of applicacion. 1 submiccing 4 . appli ants will —crow with the 'cy of�S akopee $1000 c• cove che coscs of staff an /c considerac'on of any proposed developme c projecc. Unex en ed funas shall be recurne p d to the applicant when the project 's withdrawn; denied or gra ced final approval. SEE ATTACHED FEE SCHEDULE. j. The Cicy Council reserves che right co deny any application for financing ac any stage of che • proceedings prior co adopting che final resolution auchorizing issuance of induscrial development bonds. II. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL OF APPLICATIONS a. Commercial Development Issues: The following minimum criteria must be met before che Cicy Council adopts the appropriate resolution approving any proposed project: Preliminary Resolution - 1. The loan is co be secured by a real estate morcgage and there is a decerminacion that che real escace value shall be equal co ac least 90 of che total bond or note issued. 2. The applicant has a firm commitment on incerim financing from a reputable lender. -4- 9 ,� 3. The type of financing is to be a morcgage revenue note which will be sold only CO institutional, not individual investors. 4. The proposed underwriter is known co the Cicy, or has satisfied the Cicy as to the history and reliability of the firm. 5. Sacisfaccory arrangements have been made wich the Cicy for the reimbursement of all local public coscs for the project, including the cost of any public improvements required for the property. Final Resolution - -1. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved all documentation affecting the security of the issue, as prepared by Bond Counsel for final execucion. 2. A lisc is provided of all purchasers of morcgage • revenue notes. 3. The project has been completed in general compliance • with che plans submitted at the time of the request • for the preliminary resolution. 4. Final arrangements have been made co che City's satisfaction chat all public coscs have been or will be paid. b. Industrial Revenue Bonds: -5- The following minimum criteria must be met before the City Council adopts che appropriate resolutions approving any proposed projects. Preliminary Resolution - a • 1. The financial instruments are co be secured by a mortgage and no senior unsecured debt would be approved unless che Cicy Council accepts a Standard and Pools or Moody's rating as evidence of fiscal ability to repay the costs incurred. 2. The debt service schedule shall be fixed to coincide with the useful life of any equipment or furnish- ings which are not considered an integral part of the building. 3. A certificate is furnished which indicates that the building and the furnishings value shall be equal co at least 90% of the total amount of che issue. 4. Net earnings statements for the last three years • must show chat net earnings exceed the total anticipated annual cost of debt service on the issue by two times. 5. The proposed underwriter is known to the City and has satisfied the Cicy as co che reliability of the firm. -6- ? 6. Satisfactory arrangements have been made for the payment -of all public cost of the development. 7. If interim financing is co be required that a firm comm:icment be presented from a reputable lender, or an indication from the corporation that it has funds available to complete the building itself on an interim basis. Final Resolution - 1. The project is completed in general compliance with original plans. 2. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved all legal documentation including mortgage and trust indentures. 3. Final arrangements have been made co pay all public cost. 4. The certification that no major financial change has occurred which adversely affects the • corporation's ability to pay the debt service or threatens the continued profitable operation of the corporation since the dace of the last financial statement presented at the time of the initial resolution request. III. ADMINISTRATION PROCEDURES 1. Fully completed application and supporting documentation payment must be submitted three (3) weeks before City Council consideration. . • • _ 2. City staff and consultants will review the application and prepare a report to the City Council. 3. City Council may deny the project or request preparation of the appropriate resolution for preliminary approval at the next Council meeting. 4. Approval of the final resolution will be considered by the City Council after the required criteria for firm approval have been met. • • • CITY OF SHAKOPEE APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Dace Applicant Name: Address: Phone: Location of Proposed Project (address and legal description): Please answer fully all of the following questions. You-may attach requested documentations: 1. What is the specific proposed use of the facility? 2. What is the project's estimated minimum and maximum size and /or capacity? 3. How many new people will be employed in Shakopee as a direct result of this proposed project? 4. What is the proposed date for start of construction? Completion of construction? S. What is the estimated range of costs for the facility: a. Building construction. b. Furnishings. c. Property development. d. Land acquisition. e. Professional fees. - • Application for Commercial Development Issues Page 2 \ ?/e .ems 1) Architectural engineering 2) Legal 3) Fiscal f. Other (detail). 6. What is the applicant's legal interest in the land? 7. A list of all members of any corporation, partnership or other organizations which will have a legal and fiscal interest in the ownership and management of project and that identification of that interest, and listing of credit and professional references for all interested parties (if applicable). 8. Resume of any person, partnership, or corporation which will own or manage any portion of the facility. 9. If any of the project is to be leased to other parties, an identification of those parties and a showing of commitment for that interest. 10. If interim financing is required, a showing of a binding commitment for that financing from a reputable lender. 11. Statement as to the fiscal financing method to be used such as bonds, mortgage revenue notes, or unsecured debt. 12. Statement as to whether the financing instruments will be sold to individuals, insurance companies, savings institutions or other. 13. If considered appropriate by the City, a financing feasibility report may be required which will detail those physical service and financial factors which will indicate possible success or failure of the proposed facility. 14. Method of payment of all public cost to be incurred in develop- ment of the property. Application for Commercial Development issues Page 3 • 15. Name of the underwriter or investment banker who will be • selected co place the final financing. A list of at least five other issues which have been completed by the underwriter or banker shall be provided. 16. Name of the proposed trustee to be designated. (Signed) (Date) • • • CITY OF SHAKOPEE APPLICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS Date: Applicant Name: Address: Phone: Location of Proposed Project (address and legal description): Please answer fully all of the following questions. Requested documents may be attached: 1. Specific proposed use of the facility. 1 , 2. A lisc of all of their facilities owned or operated by the applicant. 3. How many new people will be employed in Shakopee as a direct result of this proposed project? 4. What is the proposed date for start of construction? Completion of construction? S. The estimated cost of the facility classified by: a) Building construction. b) Furnishings or non -fixed equipment. c) Land acquisition. d) Property development. e) Professional fees. 1) Architectural engineering. • • .Application for Industrial Revenue Bonds Page 2 " l � 2) Legal 3) Fiscal f) Other (detail). 6. Applicant's legal interest in the land. 7. Audited financial statements of the corporation for the immediate past = three.years. 8. A description of the corporation, including a resume of owners if privately held, or a resume of major officers and the board of directors of publicly held corporations. • 9. If interim construction financing is required, a commitment for such financing from a reputable lender. 10. A statement as to the final financing vehicle as to whether the instrument should be bonds, mortgage revenue notes, or unsecured debt. 11. Method of payment to the City of all public cost. 12. The resume of the underwriters including a listing of five other comparable offerings which have been placed with that under- writer 13. A listing of all other corporate debt by amount, date of obligation, annual required payments, obligee, and type of security. (Signed) (Date) n INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS FEE Approved March 5, 1980 Mortgage or Bond City Fee $1.00 to $1,000,000 $1,000.00 $1,000,000 and over $1,000.00 plus 0.5% of amount over $1,000,000 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council — FROM: H. R. Spurrier City Engineer RE: 4th Avenue Watermain and 4th and Minnesota Revitalization Project DATE: October 30, 1980 Resolution No. 1736 is a resolution authorizing final payment to Erickson Construction Company in the amount of $9,229.44 for construction of Minnesota Street south of 4th Avenue, construction of watermain from 4th and Minnesota to 7th and Minnesota and from Minnesota Street to Dakota Street and construction of sanitary sewer from Minnesota Street south to the Milwaukee Railroad right -of -way. The watermain between Minnesota Street and Dakota Street which is a part of the 4th and Minnesota Watermain Project and the roadway construction, watermain, sanitary sewer and storm sewer construction in Minnesota Street (4th and Minnesota Revitalization Project) is hereby accepted and approved and recommended for payment. ( _ He ry R\ '.purrier, ".E. Registra No. 13. 9 HRS / j iw Attachments 9?5 O F S H A K ®P E >• CITY __ _ - -- tia■nrI rWffiIYPf`.i1E�r" n•",• -_ - - S ,�4 INCORPORATED 1870 41 r , rl) c 129 E. First Ave., Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445-3650 i, :IJ CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION CONTRACT NO. DATE October 9, 1980 DESCRIPTION: Minnesota Street Project CONTRACTOR Erickson Construction, Tnr ADDRESS 13616 Pleasant Lane, Burnsville, MN 5537 The work on the Contract specified above has been completed and accepted by the City. ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 172,945.03 AMOUNT OF CHANGE ORDER NO. THRU NO. $ -0- TOTAL CONTRACT COMPLETE IN PLACE $ 182,643.24 ' LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS $ 173,413.80 FINAL PAYMENT $ 9,229.44 APPROVED: REVIEWED BY SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION r I I _ c //6 // E+glneer. M a ger / Fr/ Dat1/- /S e Date •r- 1 1 r , (' , ,1 l . r .i J /0 Ir • PROPOSAL SCHEDULE f J PROJECT NAME Minnesota Street - OWNER TYPE OF WORK ._- PROJ. NO. SHEET OF ITEM CONTRACT ITEM UNIT UNIT _ CONTRACT Na SANITARY SEWER • • PRICE QUANTITY AMOUNT 7.. 8" DIP San. Sewer 0 -8 L.F. $ 20.09 20 $ 401.80 0 r 0.00 2.. 8" DIP San. ;Sewer 8 -10 • L.F. 21.09 590 12,443.10 472 9,954.48 3. 8" DIP San. Sewer 10 -12 L.F. 22.09 100 2,209.00 238 5,257.42 4. 4' diameter M.H. 'Ea. 800.00 2 1,600.00 2 1,600.00 5. Extra Depth in M.H. L.P. 58.60 5 293.00 4.2 246.12 .6.. 8" x h' Wyes • • .. Ea.. • 176.00 2• 4,224.00 22 3,872.00 7. 4" C.I. Service Pipe L.F. 10.00 159 15,9 1369 13,690.00 8. Rock Excavation C.Y. 18.00 19811 35,712.00 2 695 48,510.00 9. Bedding Material C.Y. 3.50 76 266.00 661 2,313.50 • WATERMAIN 1. 6" DIP L.F. 15.20 68 $ 1,033.60 58 881.60 2. 8" DIP L.F. 17.10 :1384 23,6119.30 1747 29,873.70 3. 8" x 6" Tee Ea. 173.00 3 519.00 3 519.00 4. 8" x 8" Tee Ea. 621.00 3 1,863.00 3 1,863.00 5. 6" GV and Box Ea. 272.50 6 1,635.00 7 1,907.50 6. 8" GV and Box Ea. 380.00 1 1 :1.,520.00 7 2,660.00 7. 8" x 6" Reducer Ea. 83.00 5 415.00 5 415.00 8. 8" Plug • Ea. 65.00 1 65.00 1 65.00 9. Hydrants . Ea. 866.00 2 1.732.00 2 1,732.00 10, Relocate Hydrant, G.V. & 6" leadsEa. 1.000.00 1 1,000.00 1 1,000.00 11.. 3/4" Corporation Ea. 25.00 24 � 600.00 22 550.00 12. 3/4" Curb stop and box Ea. 54.00 24 1,296.00 22 1,188.00 13. 3/4" Copper Service Pipe L.P. 7.70 1.514 11,657.80 1363 10,495.10 1 15" Steel Casing Pipe L.F. 19.00 72 1,368.00 72 1,368.00 • STREET & DRAINAGE • 1. Clear & Grub Ea. 100.00 4 400.00 3 ' 300.00 2. Aggregate Base C1 -5 (Crushed Limestone) . Ton 7.00 970 6,790.00 829 .. 5,803.00 3. 2341 Wear. Course Ton 26.94 347 9,348.18 396 10,668.24 4: Curb and Gutter (B -618) L.F. 5.25 1471 7,722.75 1445 7,586.25 . 5. 4" Sidewalk S.F. 1.44 2440 3,513.60 2768 ,3,985.92 6. 6" Sidewalk S.F. 2.93 640 1,875.20 2032 . 5,953.76 7. Bituminous Pavement (Restoration)S.Y. 12. 500 6,225.00 41.7 5,191.65 8. Curb Removal L.F. 2.00 80 160.00 80 160.00 9. Catch Basin Ea. 588.00 '2 1,176.00 2 1,176.00 10. 12" RCP C1 -IV L.F. 16.5o 35 577.50 35 577.50 11. 15" RCP C1 -Iv L.F. 17.50 55 962.50 55 962.50 12. Remove Existing Catch Basins . & Leads L.S. 500.00 1 500.00 1. 500.00 ADDITIONAL ITEMS 1, Borrow sold to contractor , (deduct) C.Y. 1.50 500 750.00 2. Rock Blasted (not excavated) C.Y. 13.50 42 567.00 SUBTOTAL ' $182,643.24 • BORROW • Borrow C.Y. 1.50 6000 ' 9,000.00 6000 9,000.00 Bldg. Demolition & Site Grading L.S. 12,000.0 1 12,000.00 1 12,000.00 Bldg. Demolition & Rough Site Grading L.S.. 11,500.04 1 11,500.00 1 11,500.00 TOTAL • 1.92 ,193 •• 33 5J RESOLUTION NO. 1736 A Resolution Accepting Work On The 79 -2 Public Improvement Program ( 4th Avenue Water mal n And 4th And Minnesota Revitalization Project) WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City on May 2, 1980, Erickson Construction, Inc., Burnsville, MN, has satisfactorily completed the waterma.in, sanitary sewer and roadway construction for the 4th Avenue Waterman and 4th and Minnesota Revitalization Project, in accordance with :;uch contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved; •and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Acting Ci.t,y Clerk and Mayor are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full, upon receipt of lien waivers from•all sub - contractors. Adopted in _ _ session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Acting City Clerk - -- Approved as to form this day of , 1980. City Attorney • .. l/4 MEMO TO: Thomas G. Brownell, Acting City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, Deputy City Clerk RE: Resolution No. 1747, Amending Resolution No. 1663 Approving The Final Plat of Minnesota Valley Fourth Addition DATE: November 14, 1980 On August 5th the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1663 Approving the Fianl Plat of Minnesota Valley 4th Addition with conditions. It appears that it would be appropriate to include in the conditions the execution of a developers agreement which agreement will provide for the necessary :improvements, the park dedication, and the limited development because of the limited sanitary sewer flow allocation, all of which were , provided for in the Minnesota Valley 3rd Addition Developers Agreement. This plat is a replat over the Minnesota Valley 3rd Addition and the City Attorney, Mr. Coller, has advised that a Developers Agreement be executed and filed for the Mn. Valley 4th Addition also. Action: Offer Resolution No. 1747, and moved its adoption. jc • • • E D._ 9 / " RESOLUTION NO. 1747 A RESOLUTION AMEWDING RESOLUTION NO. 1663 APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF MINNESOTA VALLEY FOURTH ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, • MINNESOTA, that Resolution No. 1663, Approving the Final Plat of Minnesota Valley Fourth Addition is hereby amended by replacing the requirements contained therein with the following requirements: 1] Favorable Title Opinion by the City Attorney 2] Park Dedication be in cash 3] Execution of a Developers Agreement with the same conditions as contained in the Developers Agreement for Minnesota Valley 3rd Addition, with the exception of improvements already in and approved by the City Engineer 4] Developers Agreement include the construction of a sidewalk on the West side of Polk Street and the North side of 13th Avenue 5] Execution of an easement across Outlot "A" for watermain and sanitary sewer installations BE .IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Administrator be and the same are hereby authrozed and directed to execute said approved Plat and Developers Agreement. Adopted in Adjourned Special session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 18th day of November, 1980. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Acting City Clerk Approved as to form this day of November, 1980 Ass't. City Attorney � lF • OCT ( � r ' r C 20 191, I innegasco Minnesota Gas Company 733 rnarquelle avenue, minneapolis, minnesola 55402 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CHANGE IN RATES TO: Governing Body of Each Municipality and County Affected by the Proposed Change in Rates This Notice is being provided to you as required by Minnesota Statutes Section 216B.16, Subdivision 1. On August 29, 1980, Minnesota Gas Company ( "Minnegasco ") filed a general rate increase application with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission ( "Commission ") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 216B.16. The filing has been assigned Docket No. G- 008 /GR -80 -630 by the Commission. Minnegasco's application states that the rate increase is necessary to recover increased costs in labor, taxes, services, materials, supplies and borrowed money since Minnegasco's last general rate increase application filed in October, 1977. The staff of the Minnesota Department of Public Service is currently reviewing Minnegasco's books and records. The department staff and other persons who choose to intervene in this case may contest the increases proposed by Minnegasco at the evidentiary hearing. Further notification will be sent to you when public hearings are scheduled. The proposed rates, effective for gas service rendered on and after November 27, 1980, will increase annual revenues by ,$28.3 million or 9.2 percent over present rates. If any portion of the filed increase is disallowed by the Commission before August 29, 1981, the disallowed portion will be refunded to customers, with interest, as ordered by the Commission. While individual rate changes may be substantially higher or • lower, the,monthly bill for a typical residential heating customer will increase by approximately $4. The average percentage impact of the rate increase upon annual revenues by class of service is: Class of Service Annual Average Increase Firm 10.7% Interruptible 4.0% The proposed rate schedules are available for public inspec- tion during normal business hours at the Department of Public Service, 790'American Center Building, 160 East Kellogg Boulevard, St. Paul and at Minnegasco's offices located at 733 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, 2400 North Front Street, Mankato and 620 West Litchfield, Willmar. • If you plan to intervene as a formal party in this case, contact the Office of Administrative Hearings, 1745 University Avenue, St. Paul, 55104 for information. Dated: October 17, 1980. • -2- JULIUS A. GoT.L1iR, 1'T JULIUS A.COLLER ATTORNEY AT LAW 612- 445 -1244 1859 - 1940 2 1 1 WEST F I R S T A V N U E SIl; \1COI 1 ) , :MINNESOTA .550170 r , November 12, 1980 NOV 1. 1;;80 b ' crr � ' tn. Shakopee City Council City Hall Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Council Members: During the Council Meeting of November 4th, it became apparent that St. Francis Hospital would soon be requesting a "temporary" closing of Atwood Street between 4th and 5th Avenues. From what was said it appears that the "temporary" closing could possibly last for some time - perhaps several years. The City has no statutory authority to close streets. It does have authority to vacate streets by Minnesota Statutes Annotated 414.851 upon a petition of the majority of the owners of land abutting on the street to be vacated or the Council may act on its own initiative by adopting a resolution but only upon the vote 6f 4 /5ths of all of its members and no vacation may be made until after a hearing which must be preceded by two weeks published and posted notice of intended action, and if the Council so proceeds in the resolution vacating the street it must find that it has been made to appear that the action would be beneficial to the public interest. See Krebs v The Town of Northern Beltrami County 213 Minn 344; 6 NW 2nd 803, also Dunnells Digest, Section 6623. In case of emergency,s.uch.as a fire or wind damage structure that could be hazardous to the public using the'street or during the raising of a structure abutting the street,a strictly temporary closing maybe authorized in the interest of public safety, but at most could continue only for such length of time as would be necessary to expeditiously remove the hazard. Any action not specifi- cally authorized by law would be done by the City at the City's risk and the City, to say nothing of the Council members supporting such unauthorized action, would be vunerable to suit if some person or persons are injured by the unauthor- ized act. There is also one other feature to consider in this connection and that is the proximity of the hospital. In the event of an emergency such as fire, storm damage or other similar situation, anything that would hinder the free access to the property from all sides by the police, fire departments, would create a serious hazard. Since I will not be able to be at your next Council Meeting I felt I should submit this information to you. Ver "y, t� yours, Julius A. Colley, II JAC /nh City Attorney �� / 1 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jane Wostrel Secretary - Planning & Engineering RE: Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment Actions and Recommendations at their meeting of November 13, 1980 DATE: November 14, 1980 At their meetings held last night the Commissions took action and made recommendations on the following cases: 1) Comments to the Metropolitan Council on the Comprehensive Plan Review will be made at the Planning Commission meeting of December 18, 1980. 2) Further discussion on the proposed revisions to the Shakopee Sign Ordinance to be discussed at the Planning Commission meeting of December 18, 1980. 3) JEJ 3rd Addition was discussion. City Planner was directed to report back to the Planning. Commission at their meeting of December 18, 1980, . any issues which would directly concern the platting of JEJ 3rd Addition. 4) Discussion was held on the closing of Atwood Street between 4th and 5th as a temporary measure to provide a temporary solution to the parking problems which St. Francis Hospital is undergoing now and during-their construction. It was the general agreement of the Planning Commission to conduct a survey and have a trial closure of both Atwood and Fuller between 4th and 5th (sometime in the future after obvious opening of Holmes Street) in order to determine the traffic pattern and do traffic counts. 5) Renewal was given on Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. CC -169, the operation of a day care center in a R -3 zone, subject to various conditions. 6) Renewal of the Conditional Use Permit for the Shakopee Sports Center was on the agenda but the applicant was not present for discussion so it was tabled until the December 18, 1980, Planning Commission meeting,with the applicants presence requested. • • ir • Planning Commission November 14, 1980 Board of Adjustment Actions Page -2- 7) Renewal of the Conditional Use Permit for St. Regis Paper Company in order to continue to operate an exterior storage yard of building materials was given subject to various conditions of record. 8) Preliminary Plat of Howe 1st Addition -- you have the Planning Commission recommendation of approval in your packet. 9) Preliminary Plat of Superior Supply 1st Addition -- you have the Planning Commission recommendation of approval in your packet. 10) Preliminary Plat of Minnesota Valley 5th, 6th & 7th -- you have the Planning Commission recommendation of denial in your packet. 11) The public hearing was opened and tabled to the December 18, 1980. , Planning Commission meeting, on allowing retail sales in an R -2 zone as a conditional use. This was tabled in order to receive further input from the Industrial /Commercial Commission. 12) The Planning Commission moved to enter the Comprehensive Plan Environmental Issues Amendments as part of the Comprehensive Development Plan to the Metropolitan Council. 13) Conditional Use Permit was granted to St. Francis. Hospital for them to construct a parking lot in an R -2 zone, subject to various conditions. 14) Discussion was held on the request of Steve Hentges for underground fuel storage tanks. No action was taken, however, the City Planner was instructed to do research as to why fuel tanks, other than for motor fuel stations, had been given Conditional Use Permits in various other zones. 15) The request of Steve Hentges for a 20' variance from the rear yard setback requirements and a 35' variance from the front yard setback requirements in order to construct a 7200 sq. ft. pole barn received approval. He had indicated he would be doing exterior storage, this requires a Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission moved to waive the need for this Conditional Use Permit per Section 11.60, Subd. 1, of the Shakopee City Code with the agreement that the applicant install an 80 percent opaque 6' high screening fence around the materials to be exteriorally stored. For your convenience, I have attached that part of the case report which gives the conditions for approval on the various above - listed cases. However, if you have any questions, please let me know and I'll try to hemp clarify any concerns. jiw .) Attachments /t r( Case No. PC 80 -47C November 1 s - Dorothy Olson Page -2- A4 a. 5. The applicant has complied with the conditions of th( original Conditional Use Permit. The City has not received al complaints on the operation of this facility. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends renewal of the conditional use permit for two years conditioned on: 1. The adjacent lot to the west be maintained as a play lot as long as the center is in operation. 2. Continued satisfaction of state day care licensing require- ment. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Granted renewal of Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. CC -169, subject to the following conditions: 1) To be renewed again in November of 1982. 2) The adjacent lot to the west be maintained as a play lot as long as the center is in operation. ' 3) Continued satisfaction of state day care licensing requirement 1 4) Water quality be monitored quarterly. TK /jms • • • Case No. PC 80 -45C (Renewal) November Z --rG/ St. Regis Paper Company Page -3- ' 6. Maintain 12' fire lanes between stacks of stored materials; 7. Stacks must not exceed 16' in height; 8. Conditional Use Permit to be carried out in accorc with original site plan. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Granted renewal of Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. CC -204, subject to the following conditions: 1) Renewal of Conditional Use Permit in 1982. 2) Submission of favorable report on the monitoring of groundwater. 3) Groundwater report to be conducted and submitted with renewal application in 1982. 4) Refrain from storing creosote - coated materials on the property covered by the Conditional Use Permit. 5) Maintain a 30' side and rear lot setback to be used as a fire lane and this area have a non - flamable • surface area. 6) Maintain 12' fire lanes between stacks of stored materials. 7) Stacks must not exceed 16' in height. 8) Conditional Use Permit to be carried out in accordance with original site plan. TK/ j iw ' ` Case No. PC 80 -42C Novembe St. Francis Hospital Page -2 3. The hospital improvements consist of (in part) an e emergency room, remodeled front offices and entryway. 4. The proposed parking improvements are on Lots 3, 4 / of Block 45, Original Shakopee. The property is being lease( St. Mark's Church and is presently sodded and vacant. The i) ments consist of bituminous paving, curb and gutter and a hi drainage made in the northeast corner of the lot. -- 5. The overage slope across the lot will be 3 percent. The lot will drain from the southwest to the northeast. The swale will accommodate the five -year storm to a depth of 1.5'. There will be a catch basin with a 12" pipe to the storm drainage in the street. The catch basin and pipe will be maintained by the hospital. '6. The stalls are 9' x 18' or 9' x 20' with 22' driving aisles. With a narrow (9') stall, the width of the aisle should be 24' to accommodate a one - movement swing into a stall. Full -sized cars may have to maneuver more with the 22' aisle. Staff would recommend that the angle aisle of four spaces be eliminated in favor of wider aisles, 90 degree parking along east property line and a wider landscape strip between the parking area and the property line. 7. The entire lot will be boardered with a 6' opaque fence abutting the residential areas to the west and north. Staff recommends that the height be lowered to 3' in the setback areas to insure proper' lines. Staff also recommends the fence be of attractive design, preferably cedar or redwood rather than chain link with slots. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 266, granting the construction of a parking lot for a hospital in a R -2 zone, conditioned upon: 1) Construction of a 6' high wood screening fence (3' in setback) along north and west sides. 2) Submission of landscaping plan to be approved by the City Planner. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Approved Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 266 with the conditions as follows: 1) Construction of a 6' high wood screening fence (3' in setback) along north and west sides; 2) Submission of landscaping plan to be approved by the City Planner; 3) Park manage- ment system which would free the parking lot on the southwest corner of 4th and Scott to make it available for late hour employee parking. TK/ j iw / h 7 C C : l;7t..c.v. DNR -7 Abe- )97acd -A-4_ L J fir=' '. , A ,:,,w MM OF /� : U�J U�.J E S OD ITY:\ A ." DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CENTENNIAL OFFICE BUILDING • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • 55155 DNR INFORMATION October 31, 1980 (612) 296.6157 F{le No. n / Dear Minnesota Citizen: t The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources(DNR), Trails and Waterways Unit, needs your help? The DNR must prepare a statewide trail plan within the next year. This plan must determine the number, kind and location of state trails in Minnesota. We need you, as individuals and groups, to come to an open forum and present your views on trails. The DNR will be at these forums to listen to you tell us if you want more or less trails, what kinds of trails, and where these trails should be located in your region. If you are not now a trail user, we want to know why and what we can do to make trails more inviting to you. These forums will be held at the locations and dates shown on the map of Minnesota (on the back of this letter). If you are unable to attend the forum in your region, please write your opinions down on the cover attachment to this notice and send it back as soon as possible. We will have your concerns read at the forum and they will be considered. To give us an idea on the number of speakers to schedule, the audio- visual equipment which you may wish to use, and to insure that you have an opportunity to speak, we ask that you call us by November 30th. Call us at this toll -free number: 1- 800 - 652- 9747 ask for "Trail Planning ". If you are unable to call us, please send the serf- addressed mailer with your name and phone number. We will then contact you. We're looking forward to meeting you and hearing your opinions. Input from citizens like you is vital to the success of the statewide trail plan. On behalf of the DNR, we want to thank you for your comments. *Region 11, call Sincerely, . toll -free 296 -0741 DNR Trail Planning Staff D . , O . • 1 ‘11 I I I I I I I I t • AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER i •s • i,. i it• a : i i' . i :. at :j' %: :ij %it 't :' t %t a: .j t . tt7 %t a +�..t� ✓•t'' 7j�•ijt • . µ... .,.._..,+...... �++.a.� _. .......... ....:.�. .r,a. t .t • ., x.a:��:«i�. '. r to » ,. • 11_ ,+ Ms7. • ••�•:'•- .,; t .•. .;. tbi It . tt :.:• .P' +.. •...x. ....s. ... _ ...«rr•r•...o- -... .... . ..n.•.,y -,..t .w..t. .f ,.,.... -... . ,. ro.i. +a. . .... . ...... .. ..n.. 1 ...., Y w:17r.- :.n A:•n..n.H{.•na.w•e.a..a .•...n M. . ..(•In!tiTe!i�M•!Ww + NMlk..YM MM ( C; Lint_ 0itato • 1$4 VI f.. ° .n � 4 �1° I 300 Metro Square Building, 7th Street and Robert Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Area 612, 291 -6359 November 7, 1980 1 METROPOLITAN AkHL LEGISLATORS, MUNICIPAL ICIPAL AND TOWNSHIP OFFICIALS, AND INTEI'='STE!) CITIZENS The 1980 State Waste Management Act requires the Metropolitan Council to prepare and submit a solid waste "abatement" report to the seven metropolitan ::oun_•ies by January 1981. The purpose of the report is to p_ovisie a planning framework the counties can use in developing alternatives for-reducing the future need for sanitary landfills. • • A first draft of the report was prepared in September, and was discussed at a series of meetings held around the Twin Cities Area in October. A se:ond draft of the report, entitled Land Disposal Abatement: Final Report, is now available by calling the Council's Public Information Office at 291 -6464 (publication number 12 -80 -081). The Metropolitan Council will hold a special meeting Dec. 4 to hear public comments on the document. The public meeting will be held at 7 p.m. in the Metropolitan Council offices, 300 Metro Square Bldg., 7th and Robert Sts., St. Paul. You are cordially invited to attend and offer your comments. The final report draft contains goals and recommendations to guide abatement efforts of both private industry and government. It describes different kinds of abatement strategies, discusses potential methods of financing abatement programs, potential program costs and possible economic incentives that could encourage participation of private industry in abatement programs. • Another feature of the report is a recommended schedule for implementing waste reduction, recycling, waste processing and resource recovery programs. The Twin Cities Area is expected to generate 3.1 million tons of solid waste annually by the year 2000. Without a shift to more recycling and resource recovery, it is estimated that the Twin Cities Area would need four times the landfill capacity it has now by the year 2000, even if five of the 11 existing landfills are allowed to expand as proposed. It waste generation trends continue, the Twin Cities Area could run out of capacity at its existing landfills between 1985 and 1937, even assuming. landfills owners receive permission to expand. An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Comprising: Anoka County 0 Carver County O Dakota County 0 Hennepin County 0 Ramsey County 0 Scott County 0 Washington County /(}2' However, difficulties in siting new landfills, risks of groundwater pollution and the growing demand for natural resources in relation to supply have all raised serious questions about the Twin Cities Area's continued reliance on landfills for dealing with solid wastes. Currently, only 14 percent of all `solid waste generated in the Twin Cities Area is recycled; the remainder - -86 percent - -is disposed of in the 11 sanitary landfills. The report says that this reliance on landfills could be reversed dramatically in future years if programs like those recommended in the report are implemented. Council planners estimate that the Twin Cities Area could recycle or recover energy or useful materials from 74 to 89 percent of its trash by the year 2000. The recommendations call for expanding private industry efforts at waste reduction and recycling, and implementation of similar, government- sponsored programs between now and 1984. Major resource recovery projects, like trash- burning furnances, are not likely to become operational until the end of the 1980s, although use of smaller, modular -type incinerators are a possibility before then, the report says. After the Dec. 4 public meeting, the report will undergo further revision. Adoption of the report by the Metropolitan Council is expected Dec. 18. If you would like a copy of the Council's most recent draft on abatement, please call the Public Information Office at 291 -6464. If you would like to speak at the meeting, call 291 -6482. Sincerely, Charles Weaver Chairman CW /kg • STATE OF MINNESOTA 7 ee WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD ROBERT G.DUNN •14 123 THORSON BUILDING CHAIRMAN ' --s; ( 7323 58TH AVENUE NORTH TELEPHONE: CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA 55428 METRO AREA (612) 536-0816 C ic cr • OUTSTATE 1. 800. 652.9747 , O F F I C I A L N O T I F I C A T I O N November 10, 1980 . ` .t 1?1 r. TO Affected Communities C'r g`Y f t. FROM Robert G. Dunn Chairman SUBJECT: SEARCH AREA NOTIFICATION HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL SITE This memo is an official notification that the Minnesota Waste Management Board has identified your community as a possible search area for a hazardous waste disposal facility. This notice is a part of the required siting process set in motion by the Minnesota Legislature under the Waste Management Act of 1980. The Legisla- ture, after much deliberation, decided that a hazardous waste land disposal . facility was needed in Minnesota. The Waste Management Board was created and given the task of siting at least one such land disposal facility. The Board also must inventory and recommend preferred sites for hazardous waste processing, incineration, and transfer and storage facilities. Your community may be considered as a potential site for these facilities as well. The hazardous waste disposal facility that we are considering will be based on successful waste management practices and technologies used elsewhere in the United States. No decision has been made yet about the final facility design- -the Legislature decided that it should first be the subject of public . discussion and debate- -but an enclosed sheet suggests some of the technologies that may be used as well as why such facilities are needed. Naturally, you will ask, "On what basis have you chosen us as a possible search area for hazardous waste disposal facility ?" The answer is this- - we have not yet eliminated any community. We want to share the information we have and get your ideas before we make a final decision. We must make some major decisions on criteria and sites soon. The law requires that by May 1981, the Waste Management Board must propose six or more candidate sites for the hazardous waste land disposal facility. That means that between now and May 1981, we must discuss and select criteria and apply those criteria BOARD MEMBERS: DISTRICT 1 LAURENCE HUNTER. Hastings DISTRICT 5 LOUISE KUDERLING, Minneapolis DISTRICT 2 KEITH KUITERS. Clarks Grove DISTRICT 6 THOMAS RENNER, Elk River DISTRICT 3 WILLIAM KIRCHNER, Richfield DISTRICT 7 ALLAN EIDE, Hitlerdal DISTRICT 4 MILTON KNOLL, JR. White Bear Lake DISTRICT 8 DAVID HARTLEY, Hermanlown _2_ to the entire State. Obviously, criteria become very important to the selection process. Depending on the criteria, any locality in Minnesota, including yours, could be selected as a site for this facility. In keeping with both the spirit and letter of the Waste Management Act, the Minnesota Waste Management Board will select criteria and candidate sites only after extensive public involvement at the local level. As a local official, you and /or a representative of your community are invited and encouraged to participate in this process. If you ignore this public input process, then your community may not be fully represented as criteria are discussed and selected. Enclosed with this memo is a. reply card. Please return it to us with the names and mailing addresses of the person or persons from your community who will help Minnesota select criteria for the siting of a hazardous waste land disposal facility. The persons whose names you give us, together with other interested citizens, will form a criteria and siting committee in your Development Region. A similar committee will be formed in each of the 13 Development Regions of the State. Regional Development Commission staff representatives may help the committees by arranging meeting space, taking minutes, sending notices, etc. The committees will meet at least twice between now and May 1981. Their job is to give the Waste Management Board significant input into the process of select- ing criteria and sites for a hazardous waste disposal facility. Also enclosed is a step -by -step schedule which details the procedures the Waste Management Board will follow in selecting candidate and final sites for the disposal facility. As you can see, there is also opportunity for public involve- ment after the candidate sites have been selected. Your involvement prior to that time, however, can help determine whether or not your community is in the final list. Another enclosure for your consideration before our upcoming meetings is a fact sheet on siting factors that have been suggested to us. Some of these factors might eliminate your area from further consideration. Others might identify your community as a likely location for a hazardous waste disposal site. Although we are listing these factors without endorsement, we will have to choose between them soon so we can identify sites. So come to the meeting in your Development Region if you agree or disagree with these factors or if you have others to propose. We want your recommendations and suggestions on the criteria, standards, and procedures we should use in selecting candidate sites, either at the meeting or by letter before then. Your community is a possible site for a hazardous waste disposal facility. Your community should help the Waste Management Board determine where and on what basis this facility ought to be sited. We have no preconceived notions. We do, however, agree with,the Legislature that hazardous, non - nuclear waste is a problem and that something has to be done. We also know that the problem, while serious, its not yet critical. Together we can find a solution. But we need your help to do it. Please send us the names of your community representatives no later than November 21, 1980. RGD:mhr Enclosures /i • WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD SITING TIMETABLE Disposal Facilities - November, 1980. The Waste Management Board (WMB) notifies communities in search areas for hazardous waste disposal facilities. - November, 1980 - May, 1981. Public meetings will be held in each Development Region to discuss and recommend siting criteria to the WMB. - May, 1981. The WMB must propose six or more candidate sites for commercial hazardous waste disposal facilities. - May, 1981 - August, 1981. Additional meetings as well as hearings will be held in the Development Regions on the proposed candidate sites. - August, 1981. The WMB will select six candidate sites in six different counties - -one per county. Subsequently, the Governor will appoint a Local Project Review Committee from each affected county to act as a communication link between the affected community and the involved state agencies to relay information and local concerns. Each Local Project Review Committee must select a temporary voting member to serve on the Waste Management Board to represent his or her community in the siting deliberations of the WMB. - January, 1982. The WMB will present two reports to the Legislative Commission on Waste Management, after consultation with the Local Project Review Com- mittees and after a public meeting in each affected county. One report will be on mitigation of local effects of a hazardous disposal facility, and will propose ways to reduce local impacts and compensate the host communities. The other report will be on hazardous waste management, and will contain a draft hazardous waste management plan and a proposed certificate of need for one or more disposal facilities. - May, 1982. The WMB will issue a certificate of need for hazardous waste disposal facilities that will specify the size and types of disposal facilities to be built at one or more of the candidate sites. - September, 1982, The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency will complete environmental impact statements on disposal facilities at each of the six candidate sites. - Spring, 1983. The WMB will select one or more of the sites for disposal facilities, after hearings in each county, discussions with affected local governments and others, and after consideration of the Pollution Control Agency's environmental impact statements. Processing Facilities - June 1, 1981. The WMB will propose at least 9 sites to appear on a hazardous waste processing site inventory, including (1) three incineration sites, (2) three chemical processing sites, and (3) three transfer and storage sites. - November 1, 1981. The WMB will prepare a final inventory of processing sites. // WHAT IS A HAZARDOUS WASTE LAND DISPOSAL FACILITY AND WHY DOES MINNESOTA NEED ONE? Along with the benefits of modern technology come certain drawbacks. To make our standard of living possible, a variety of manufacturing processes furnish necessary products. Those same processes, however, produce by- products and eventually wastes. These include, for example, miscellaneous chemicals, waste oils and solvents, paint sludges, electro- plating wastes, and incinerator ashes. These waste by- products must be safely disposed of or effectively recycled or reprocessed. Most wastes from industry do not constitute a problem, but some do. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency have identified certain wastes from industrial, laboratory, medical, mining, and agricultural activities as "hazardous." (Actually, even some household activities'could generate hazardous wastes.) Unlike solid waste, such as household garbage, hazardous wastes usually cannot be routinely managed in a sanitary landfill. Specially designed facilities may be necessary to ensure that these wastes are reduced and disposed of safely. Processing facilities can recycle or reduce the amount of hazardous waste, and disposal facilities are used for Tong -term containment. Technology exists to ensure the safe disposal of hazardous waste, but currently Minnesota does not have the facilities needed to manage the hazardous wastes generated by our state (more than 150,000 tons per year, by one estimate). It is the responsibility of the Waste Management Board to determine specifically what sizes and types of facilities are needed to manage these wastes, and then to find a site for at least one land disposal facility in the State. The private sector will be expected to construct and operate the facilities once the sites are finally chosen. Since the technical options available must be tailored to the specific needs of the State, Minnesotans must register their opinions on the need, safety, cost, benefit and effect of a hazardous waste disposal facility. That's why public involvement is needed. Without this involvement, it is too early to say exactly what Minnesota's land disposal facility will look like. However, a general picture can be tentatively drawn. The land disposal facility would be large — possibly 400 acres if it is to contain 20 years of Minnesota's land disposable hazardous waste. "Cells" for waste containment would be constructed, first by excavating soil and then by installing engineering safeguards against waste seepage. These would probably include carefully placed clay or synthetic liner systems and underground collection pipes to collect seepage and return it to the surface for treatment. There would also be monitoring systems to warn if any seepage had penetrated the liners and escaped into surrounding soils. Wastes would probably be trucked in; possibly 20 to 30 loads a day. Laboratory spot checks (on or off site) would ascertain the identity and appropriate management of incoming wastes. Pre- treatment of certain wastes would probably be required, and could occur either at the disposal site or at a waste processing facility elsewhere. This would have the effect of reducing the volume • or the level of hazard of the wastes, or of removing excess water that could complicate operations or carry contaminants away from the land disposal facility. Incompatible wastes would be separated and placed in different parts of the site, and accurate records of all wastes disposed and their locations in the facility would be maintained. As individual waste containment cells were filled during the operation of a site, impermeable soils or liners would be placed over them and the top soil would be contoured to handle rain runoff. This would help divert moisture from the wastes and still further reduce the chance of'seepage away from the site. Final closure of the facility would be performed according to strict federal and state environmental standards. Before the facility operator could even be licensed he or she would have to have determined provisions for Tong -term care of the site. Included would be final cover and contouring, and groundwater and other long -term monitoring of the site. Any problems would have to be corrected by the facility operator alone or in conjunction with federal or state authorities. This description is only preliminary, since the final design of the facility is one of the issues for public discussion before the Waste Management Board makes any final decisions. prepared by: Minnesota Waste Management Board 7323 58th Avenue North Crystal, MN 55428 POSSIBLE SITING FACTORS The Waste. Management Board (WMB) decided not to select siting criteria for a hazardous waste disposal facility until citizens throughout the State had expressed their opinions on the subject. However, to encourage discussion the WMB is now mentioning certain factors that have been suggested to the WMB or in past siting studies. They are stated without endorsement by the WMB, and are merely a starting point for the discussion that will guide the WMB in choosing final criteria and sites that are acceptable to most of the interested citizens of the State. These factors reflect opinions of various government agencies and other organizations regarding the best types of locations to site hazardous waste land disposal facilities, based on such concerns as groundwater protection, transportation safety, economic feasibility, industrial development, and health, safety, and nuisance impacts on the nearby public. These are not the final siting criteria, nor have they been given any weights relative to each other. Maps will be available at future meetings in your Development Region that show how your community stands on some of these factors. Other factors may not be mapped because statewide data is unavailable or because they cannot be researched and analyzed until specific sites are under consideration. HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATION — Hazardous waste generation is often concentrated in industrialized areas. It has been suggested that disposal facilities should not be sited too far from the points of generation because of increased transportation costs and risks. In Minnesota, the only statewide data currently available indicates that the major generating areas are the Twin Cities Metropolitan area and Southeast Minnesota, generating an estimated 66 percent and 18 percent of the State's hazardous wastes, respectively. It is difficult to say how close a disposal facility should be to the generating areas. One suggested figure is 100 miles or less, although today certain wastes are being trucked about 400 miles to facilities in Illinois and elsewhere. TRANSPORTATION ACCESS — Reports done for the Pollution Control Agency and other government bodies have suggested that transportation access may be an important siting factor, since it will determine the roadways that hazardous waste will move over and the likelihood and the possible harmful effects of any accidents. Possible aspects to consider include adjacent land uses (e.g., schools, hospitals, and residences), the number of intersections per mile, and the distance from certain types of main highways (e.g., limited access four -lane roadways; State and federal highways; or 9 -ton capacity roads). SETTLEMENT PATTERNS — A study of hazardous waste done for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency suggests that a hazardous waste land disposal facility and buffer zone could require about 420 acres to contain 20 years worth of Minnesota - generated wastes. This size is very tentative and will be finally determined only after further analysis, public discussion, and decisions regarding what wastes may be land disposed in Minnesota. Still, the 420 - acre figure suggests that areas of dense population settlement may not contain land parcels large enough for a facility. LAND OWNERSHIP PATTERNS — Land ownership patterns may affect the feasibility of acquiring parcels of land large enough to accommodate a hazardous waste land disposal facility. They also can affect the types of adjacent land uses that may be subject to nuisance impacts from a facility. Some of the land ownership patterns that may be considered include the number of different owners and whether ownership is public or private. In the case of public ownership, distinctions must be made between which level of govern- ment owns the land and what the land's dedicated use or category is, such as park, forest, or tax forfeited land. It may only be practical to research many of these questions after specific sites are identified. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT EFFECTS — A hazardous waste disposal facility could attract industrial de- velopment, especially if the impacted community and the State decide to provide incentives to companies to locate near the site. Preference may be given to communities that desire such development and have sufficiently large industrial park locations available. Some of the issues raised by this and other factors will be the subject of a report the WMB will prepare for the Legislative Commission on Waste Management on the mitigation of local effects of hazardous waste facilities. This report will be prepared jointly with citizens from the candidate site communities, and may recommend that the Legislature consider such programs as tax relief, reimbursement for public services, or incentives for industrial development. PRODUCTIVITY OF THE LAND FOR VARIOUS USES — Land is a natural resource, and some land is more suited for certain uses than others. Possible uses to consider are agriculture, forestry, mining, wildlife habitats, and • public enjoyment of natural environment. The WMB may have to make hard choices between sites and uses because one candidate site may be good for one use, and another candidate site may be good for another use. To choose between these different uses, factors to consider include: the relative productivity of the candidate site for the particular use, the availability of other suitable land for that use, and the emphasis that the people of the Development Region and the State want to place on the different possible uses. It should be noted that the Legislature has decided that no land may be excluded from consideration for a site unless it is unlikely to qualify for a Pollution Control Agency permit. HYDROGEOLOG The Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) has prepared a report to the WMB that recommends that hazardous waste disposal sites be located• away from major groundwater systems, such as significant bedrock and surficial aquifers. This would insure that a disposal facility would be less likely to pollute these natural resources by accidental seepage. MGS recommends that the WMB divide the State into three categories: ® Areas where there is a low probability of groundwater contamination because significant groundwater resources are probably absent. • Areas where productive groundwater systems may or may not exist, so that there is a reduced probability of finding naturally favorable sites. © Areas where significant groundwater systems exist, and where extensive engineering or natural protection (e.g., low permeability clay soils) would be necessary to safeguard these groundwater systems from any accidental seepage from a disposal facility. SOIL PERMEABILITY — The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has stated that thick layers of low permeable soils — such as certain heavy clays — will inhibit the flow of spilled wastes into groundwater systems below even if the wastes somehow penetrate the engineered safeguards of a facility (such as liners and collection devices). Therefore, thick, impermeable soils might compensate for inadequacies in the hydrogeology factor. EPA at one point used the figures of five feet of material with a permeability of less than two inches per year. Such exact data are not available on a statewide basis, so on -site investigations would be necessary to determine the permeabilities and soil thicknesses of specific tracts of and — if the citizens of the State and the WMB finally decide that soil permeability is an important siting factor. SURFACE WATERS AND FLOODPLAINS — The Pollution Control Agency and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency regulate hazardous waste disposal. Though they offer few specific siting criteria, they do prohibit certain locations, including: within a 100 -year flood plain; within 1,000 feet of shoreland; and within a wetland. These surface water factors must be observed by the WMB in the siting process, although they may become most relevant only after specific sites are being considered. This is because many of these prohibited areas are often less than a township in size. So although a part of a township is excluded, there still may be enough land within it for an acceptable site. prepared by: Minnesota Waste Management Board 7323 58th Avenue North Crystal, MN 55428 • Meeting Notice Hazardous Waste Disposal Site Search Area Notification An important meeting regarding this notification will be held in Scott County at 7:00 p,m, on December 18, 1980, It will be held at: Shakopee High School Lunchroom For further information please contact the Waste Management Board at 7323 - 58th Avenue North, Crystal, Minnesota 55428, or call 612/536 -0816,