HomeMy WebLinkAboutDecember 16, 1980 TENTATIVE AGENDA ty
ADJ.REG.SESSI SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 16, 1980
Mayor Harbeck ,presiding
11 Roll Call at 7:30 P.M.
2] Approval of Minutes of Sept. 16, 1980 and December. 2, 1980.
3] Communications:
4] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers:
a] Cncl.Colligan from the Fire Dep't.; Jt. Seven Man Committee
and the Planning Commission
b] Cncl.Hullander
c] Cncl.Lebens from the Community Services Board
d] Cncl.Leroux from the Shakopee School. Board
e] Cncl.Reinke from the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
f] Mayor Harbeck from Scott County Board of Commissioners
5] RECOGNITION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANYONE PRESENT IN THE AUDIENCE
WHO DESIRES TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA
6] Old Business:
a] Fire Service Agreement
b] Vacation Policy
7] Planning Commission Recommendations:
8] Routine Resolutions and Ordinances:
a] Res. No. 1756, Authorizing Leasing of City Property (Wm Hauer)
b] Res. No. 1757, Authorizing Leasing of City Property (N. Theis)
c] Ord. No. 50, Changing Definition of City Admr. and Adding A
Definition of City Clerk
d] Ord. No. 51, Changing Provisions Relating to Duties of City Admr.
and Adding Duties of City Clerk
e] Res. No. 1761, Amending the 1981 Pay Schedule
f] Res. No. 1760, Amending Res. No. 1643 Concerning Condemnation
Policy
g] Res. No. 1759, Amending Conditions of Approval of Link's 2nd Add'n.
h] Res. No. 1762, Accepting Work on the Demolition and Site Grading
for Macey's 2nd Add'n.
i] Res. No. .1763 Accepting Work on the Borrow for Macey's 2nd Add'n.
9] New Business:
a] 8:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING on an appeal from the Planning Comm.
approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a parking lot in
• an R -2 (Urban Res. District) requested by St. Francis Hospital
b] 8:35 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED on application from S. & W.
for $600,000 Industrial Revenue Development Bonds
c] 8:45 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING on the proposed VIP Sanitary Sewer
Interceptor (81 -1 formerly 79 -4)
Res. No. 1764, Order Improvement .& Preparation of Plans & Specs
Res. No. 1765, Approving Plans & Specs and Ordering Ad for Bids
d] 9:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED on application from St..Francis
Hospital for $9,120,000 Industrial Revenue Bonds
e] District Heating and Cooling System Projects
f] Installation of Equipment at 200 Levee Drive
g] Appeal from Building Code Requirements by Gene Pearson
TENTATIVE AGENDA
December 16, 1980
Page -2-
h] Lease of Automobile
i] Application from V.F.W. for Bingo and Gambling Licenses
j] Partial Estimate Vouchers:
aa] No. 2 to Richard Knutson, Inc. - $39,783.38, East View 1st
bb] No. 1 to Mn. Valley Surfacing - $59,459.62, East View 1st
cc] No. 2 to Mn. Valley Surfacing - $18,316.38, Weinandt Acres
k] Partial Estimate Voucher No 2 to Crowley Fence Co. Inc. for
$23,783.00 for Kmart Fence On Site Improvements
1] Park Reserve Fund Budget
m] Ord. No. 49, Amending the City Code Dealing With The West Side
Sewer Flow Allocation
n] Approve payment of the bills
o] Workmens Compensation Insurance Policy
p] Dorothy Egan sewer'problem
q] Lease for Copier
r] Railroad Property South of Public Works Building
10] Consent Busines's : .
a] Accept resignation from George Johnson, Assessing Dep't.
b] Set Joint Meeting with S.P.U.C. for Jan. 16th at 5:00 P.M.
11] Other Business:
a] John Leroux would like to investigate the usefulness of an
ordinance requiring an annual inventory of stored chemicals in
industrial rind commerc:i a7. buildings.
b]
c]
12] Adjourn.
John K. Anderson
/ 1 '
�.� TENTATIVE AGENDA
SHAKOPEE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Special Session December 16, 1980
Chairman Hullander presiding
1. Roll call at 7:00 P.M.
•
2. Elderly Highrise
a. Installation of equipment at 200 Levee Drive
b. Purchase of land from City of Shakopee for elderly highrise
3. Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project
a. Reimbursement for cost of underground electrical service
and miscalculation of building permit for homes
b. Report on 235 Program
4. Report on Meeting with Chamber of Commerce
• 5. Approval of Bills
6. Other Business
7. Adjourn
Jeanne Andre
Executive Director
.1)
✓
MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director
RE: Purchase of Land from City of Shakopee for Elderly Highrise
DATE: December 5, 1980
Introduction
The City Finance Director has requested completion of the
purchase of two vacant lots by the HRA from the City, for the
purpose of inclusion in the redevelopment district of the tax
increment project for the elderly highrise, before the end of
the 1980 fiscal year.
Background
On October 2, 1979, the HRA approved the acquisition and
sale of certain property to be included in the Elderly Highrise
Redevelopment Project No. 1 in Resolution No. 79 -27. An appraisal
was conducted by Wiley Real Estate Appraisal as of August 13,
1979, which established the value of two vacant lots owned by
the City of Shakopee and included in the redevelopment district,
at a sum of $25,800.00. On December 4, 1979 the City Council of
the City of Shakopee adopted Resolution No. 1529, A Resolution
Authorizing the Sale of City Land to the Shakopee Housing and
Redevelopment Authority for the Purpose of Providing Land for
an Elderly High -Rise. This resolution established a sales price
of $25,800.00. Title to the land was transferred on January 7,
1980. However funds were not transferred at that time between
the Housing Authority and the City.
Recommendation and Required Action
The Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority authorize
payment of $25,800.00 to the City of Shakopee for the following
property:
Lot 6, Lot 8 EXCEPT the East 20 feet of the South 112
feet; Lot 9 EXCEPT the South 112 feet of the West one -
half (W 1/2); All in Block 6, City of Shakopee, EXCEPT-
ING THEREFROM THE NORTH 30 FEET OF ALL THE ABOVE
DESCRIBED TRACTS.
for the purpose of inclusion in the redevelopment district of
the Elderly Highrise Redevelopment Project No. 1. Such pay-
ment is to be made by transfer from the HRA Elderly High -Rise
fund to the Capital Equipment Development Fund of the City of
Shakopee.
JA /jms
3 cz_
MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment
Authority (HRA)
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director
RE: Reimbursement for cost of underground electrical service
and miscalculation of building permit for homes built by
Goodwin Builders
DATE: December 10, 1980
Introduction
Goodwin Builders has requested reimbursement for the added cost of
placing individual electrical service underground instead of over-
head (as bid) for homes built on lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, Block
2, Macey Second Addition. The company has also requested reimburse-
ment for the difference in the amount paid for building permits
for these units versus the amount estimated in their contract.
Background
Goodwin Builders originally proposed to provide overhead electrical
service to the homes to be built in Macey Second Addition. The con-
tract between Goodwin and the HRA did not address the question of
whether electrical service would be overhead or underground. The
HRA subsequently required Goodwin to provide underground service
(consistent the City policy for new development) and agreed in
principal to provide payment for the additional cost of the under-
ground service. Goodwin has now provided information as to the cost
difference for the two types of installation as follows:
Underground Costs.
$356.50 per unit x 4 lots $1,426.00
(lots 5,6,7 and 8)
$326.00 per unit x 2 lots 652.00
( lots 9 and 10) $2,078.00
Overhead Costs
$235.00 per unit x 6 units $1,410.00
Difference between two types of installation = $668.00
Building permits were orignally estimated to be $652.50 per unit,
but actually were $702.75. The HRA has previously agreed in
principal to provide payment for this difference of $50.25.
Recommended Action:
Increase the cost of each unit to the buyers by $161.25 to cover
the additional cost of installation of underground electrical service
and the increase building permit fee. If payment of this amount by
the buyer increases the purchase price above the maximum provided in
the purchase agreement, the HRA would pay this amount directly to
the builder. (In the four units to be closed the week of Dec. 15th,
the maximum purchase price would not be exceeded).
JA:plk
l /
MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment
Authority (HRA)
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director
RE: Cost of Water and Sewer Connections and State Deed
Cost for Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, Macey Second
Addition
DATE: December 16, 1980
Introduction
Goodwin Builders, Inc. previously informed the Housing Authority
of a problem that exists in the individual water and sewer service
provided by Erickson Construction to the above listed lots. In
addition, Goodwin now has an additional problem with payment of
the State Deed Tax for the transfer of these lots to the buyers.
Background
The individual water and sewer lines from the street were con-
structed by Erickson Construction into each lot up 30 feet from
the front property line (to the building set-back). However °
services for the six lots listed above were not on or near the
lot -split lines, for each double unit as originally anticipated
and bid by Goodwin. Therefore he assumed the additional task
of bringing the services to the lot -split property line on which
the double unit is centered. Mr. Goodwin has now presented bills
which indicate that he spent at least $490.00 per unit for this
work. This amount includes $70.00 for the water meter. Goodwin
is requesting payment for this work.
Goodwin has recently discovered that the builders are required
to pay the state transfer tax to transfer the deed from the
builder to the buyer. This is standard real estate practice.
Other builders in this program have paid this transfer tax.
However Goodwin intends to attend the HRA meeting tonight to
contest this practice. Bernice Smolley of Northwestern Bank
Southwest has indicated that this closing cost cannot be born
by the buyer.
Alternatives
Payment of two separate costs are at issue here. Regarding the
cost of connecting water and sewer lines the HRA can pay these
costs directly or allow them to be passed on to each individual
buyer. The full amount requested ($490.00) can be paid, a lower
amount, or approval for payment can be denied.
Regarding the state transfer tax, the HRA could allow a price
increase to Goodwin to cover this cost, or pay them this cost
with HRA general funds. Alternately approval for payment of
this cost can be denied.
•
•
Page 2
Recommendations
I recommend that the HRA authorize $490.00 to be built into
the cost of each unit for lots 6,7,8,9, and 10, Macey Second
Addition. This amount will reimburse Goodwin the cost he has
incurred, and still allow the purchase price and down payment
to remain within the constraints of the purchase agreement
between Goodwin and the buyers for the five units for which
points have been held. The cost of the unit on Lot 5 is still
unclear, therefore I recommend delaying authorization for pay-
ment of this cost at this time.
I recommend that the HRA not authorize payment of any amount
toward the cost of the state transfer tax. The other builders
also had to bear this cost, and it is a normal part of real
estate transactions. Therefore to be consistent the HRA
should not make any special provision for Goodwin.
•
•
MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment
Authority (HRA)
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director
RE: Report on Meeting with Chamber of Commerce
DATE: December 11, 1980
Introduction
On Thursday, December 11, 1980, a meeting was held with city staff
and representatives of the Chamber of Commerce regarding downtown
redevelopment. John Anderson, Tim Keane, and Jeanne Andre attended
as city staff and Fred Corrigan and Gary Eastland attended from
the Chamber.
Background
In the past year the Chamber of Commerce conducted a study of the
central business district in Shakopee. In May the HRA agreed to
provide staff support for redevelopment efforts, as current pro-
jects draw to a close.
The meeting was held to initiate staff involvement in basic plan-
ning for possible redevelopment efforts. Members of the Chamber
reviewed findings in their report as to the problems with trans-
portation and need for. City involvement if redevelopment of certain
sectors is to occur.
Staff proposed to review previous information gathered on redevelop-
ment of the central business district and consider possible alter-
natives and staff time available for future activity. A report
of the staff recommendation approaching redevelopment should
be available at the first HRA meeting in January.
JA /jms
l7 •
MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment
Authority (HRA)
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director
RE: Approval of Bills
DATE: December 11, 1980
I recommend payment of the following bills:
1. National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials
(NAHRO), $60.00, for individual memberships for Jeanne Andre
and Richard Hullander.
2. Scott County Housing and Redevelopment Authority, $542.50,
for administrative overhead for five Minnesota Housing
Finance Agency Home Improvement Grants administered within
the City of Shakopee during 1980 (@ $108.50, as per Coopera-
tion Agreement of October 28, 1980).
JA /jms
•
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Fire Service Agreement
DATE: December 11, 1980
Introduction
Staff has been in contact with the townships regarding revision
of the Fire Service Agreement but lacks authority to take any
further action.
Background
I have sent revised agreements to the townships for their execu-
tion with a return suspense date of December 22, 1980. Council
has discussed notifying them of termination by January 1, 1981
if they do not agree but there has not been an official action
by Council to authorize or direct staff to issue a termination
notice. Also, the townships may come back with a counter pro-
posal that may be of merit.
Alternatives
In view of Council discussion, I perceive two alternatives if
the townships do not execute an agreement:
1. Issue termination as of January 1, 1981 and work out any
counter proposals during the 6 month notification period
for termination.
2. Do not issue termination notice if there is a counter
proposal and negotiate further.
Recommendation
Alternative number one is recommended because it forces the
parties to keep the issue active and it does allow 6 months
to reach a new agreement if desired.
GV /jms
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Vacation Policy
DATE: December 10, 1980
Introduction
Council took action last month regarding an individual's vacation.
I would like clarification as to the exact intent of Council's
action in this instance and how it impacts the personnel policy
and other employees.
Background
The Council moved to reinstate LeRoy Houer's third week of vaca-
tion at the November 4, 1980 meeting. Clarification is desired
as to what Council actually intended to do. Did they:
A. Grant 3 weeks of vacation for 1980, and for each
year thereafter indefinately.
B. Grant vacation at the rate of three weeks per
year effective November 5, 1980 and thereafter.
C. Intend to change his employment date back to his
original employment date (allowing adjustments
for the break in employment) and ignore the fact
that he quit and was rehired.
Number one and number two do not address future changes in vacation
accrual in accordance with the Personnel Policy.
The Personnel Policy states that all full time and part time employ-
ees shall earn vacation leave in accordance with the following
schedule:
0 - 5 years of continuous* employment 10 days
6 - 15 years of continuous* employment 15 days
16 + years of continuous* employment 20 days
(For part time employees this shall be computed on the
basis of time actually worked).
LeRoy Houser actually quit, drawing his severance pay and was later
rehired including serving a six month probationary period. He was
also paid as a consultant for inspection work performed while he
was not an employee.
*NOTE - The Policy does specify continuous employment.
w f
Other employees that should be considered in the interest of
equity include:
Phyllis Knudson who worked from January -June 1975, was laid off
for 3 months and came back under C.E.T.A. in September 1975.
C.E.T.A. funded employees are to be treated as any other City
employee under the terms of the grant. Her service date for
vacation accrual has previously been considered to be September
1976 when C.E.T.A. funding terminated and she stayed on as a
City funded employee, rather than 1975 when she commenced employ-
ment with the City.
Pat Mohrbacher commenced employment August 1977 under a C.E.T.A.
program. Her situation is the same as Phyllis but has not com-
pleted 5 years of service yet.
Diane Heinz commenced employment June 1968. She has been employed
continuously although 2 years were part time rather than full time
and part of that was C.E.T.A. funded. She did not begin earning
her third week of vacation until October 1979. Her adjusted 5
year point was January 1974 and she did not get the third week
when it was adopted. Her situation will arise again at the 15
year point.
Alternatives (re: LeRoy Houser)
1. Clarify Mr. Houser's situation (A, B, or C above) and have
him remain as an exception to the policy.
2. Reconsider Council action of November 4, 1980 and have Mr.
Houser's vacation follow the schedule in the Personnel Policy.
3. Change Personnel Policy to reflect net total years of service
rather than continuous years of service.
Alternatives (re: Former C.E.T.A. employees)
1. Continue to not recognize C.E.T.A. funded years of service
for purposes of determining service date for vacation benefits.
2. Recognize the employment date (whether C.E.T.A. involved or
not) for determining service date for vacation benefits.
Recommendation
Recommend alternative #2 for Mr. Houser because he did quit and
was rehired, it is consistent with the adopted Personnel Policy
and is more equitable to all employees.
Recommend alternative #2 for former CETA funded employees because
the Personnel Policy does not distinguish C.E.T.A. participants,
C.E.T.A. grants specify that they be treated as a regular City
employee and it is not fair to penalize the employee because
they started under C.E.T.A. Ms. Knudson would receive the 3rd
week a year sooner and Ms. Heinz would earn her 3rd week from
February 1978 instead of October 1979.
GV /jms
pL
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: 1981 Farm Lease
DATE: December 2, 1980
The City has leased some of its land at Memorial Park for a
number of years to William Hauer. Resolution No. 1756
authorizes a lease for 1981 under the same terms and con-
ditions as 1980.
Also, Norbert Theis has farmed land at Lions Park for many
years. Council authorized a lease for 1980 but Mr. Theis
never signed and returned the lease. I have sent him a
bill for the amount in the unexecuted lease. Resolution
No. 1757 authorizes a lease for 1981.
Leases for 1981 will not be executed until payment is
received for 1980.
GV /jms
•
•
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 1756
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LEASING OF CITY PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee owns ccrLain properties, and
WHEREAS, certain parcels are not currently utilized for
City functions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor. and City Administrator
are authorized to enter into a one - -yen r I c'n se for 1981 with
William Hauer for the sum of not :Less than $250.00, and not more
than $500.00, prorated with crop loss due to Flooding, plus ad
valorem taxes for the following property:
Government Lot 1 in Section 31, Township 1 Range 22 and
Government Lot 1 in Section 32, Township 1 1 6 , Range 22.
Adopted in — session of Lhe City Council of
the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this__ _ clay of
1980.
Mayor- of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to Form this
day of , "1.980.
Ci.cy Atcorncy - - - - --
•
RESOLUTION NO. 1757
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LEASING, OF CITY PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee owns certain properties, and;
WHEREAS, certain parcels are not currently utilized for
City functions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE .1-'I' RESOLVED RY '11II'. CJ'I'Y COUNCIL, OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, Lhat the Mayor- and City Administrator
are authorized to enter- into a one -year Lease for 1981 with Norbert
Theis for the sum of $720.00, for the following property:
18 acres in the NW4 SW4 Section 12 Township 1.15 Range 23
Adopted in ______________ session of the City Council of
the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of
, :1.980.
1 C - — he City of Shakopee •
ATTEST:
City C :I. e r k ---- ` - - - - --
Approved as to form this __ --
day of — ,1980
City Attorney - - - --
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, Deputy City Clerk
RE: Separation of Administrator and C.i.Ly Clerk Responsibilities
DATE: December 11, 1980
Introduction:
It is my understanding that the City Council has previously
discussed the separating of the responsibilities of the City Clerk
from those of the City Administrator, and directed that the appro-
priate ordinance be drafted to be effective January 1, 1981.
Attached is a coley of Lwo ordinances prepared by our cool i [ers ,
one amending Chapter :1., and one amending Chapter 2 of the City Code,
which ordinances provide for the separating of the responsibilities
of the two positions. The resol nt i can mak i n;; an appointment should
be adopted at the next Council meat i m;, after the two ordinances
have been published and become effective.
Recommendation:
1. Offer Ordinance No. 50, and move its adoption.
2. Offer Ordinance No.• 51, and move its adoption.
JSC /jms
•
•
•
ORDINANCE NO. 50 , 4T11 SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE SHAKOPEE
CITY CODE, CHAPTER 1, ENTITLED "GENERA]', PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS
APPLICABLE TO TIIE ENTIRE CITY CODE INCLUDING PENAL'T'Y FOR VIOLATION",
BY CHANGING THE DEFINITION OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR AND ADDING A DEFINI-
TION OF CITY CLERK; AND MAKING TIIIS ORDINANCE APPLICABLE TO EVERY
CHAPTER, SECTION OR OTHER PROVISION OF TIIE SHAKOPEE CITY CODE.
TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Shakopee City Code, Section 1.02, Subdivision 3, is
hereby amended to read: .
Subd. 3. The term "City Administrator" means the
person duly appointed by the City Council and acting in such
capacity.
Section 2. Shakopee City Code, Section 1.02, is amended by add-
ing a Subdivision to read:
Subd. 20. The term "City Clerk" means the person
duly appointed by the City Council and acting in such capacity.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be applicable to every Chapter,
Section or other provision of the Shakopee City Code.
Section 4. After adoption, ignlncl ..Intl attestation, this Ordi-
nance shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City
and shall be; in effect on and after January 1, 1981.
Adopted by the City Council of Shakopee, Minnesota, this
day of -_- , 1980, by the I o.l.low.iny vote: -- -
Yes:
No:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Prepared and approved as to form this of
— _
City Attorney
(Published in the on
19 Proof of publication attached.)
ORDINANCE NO. 51 , 4TH SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE
SHAKOPEE CITY CODE, CHAPTER 2, ENTITLED "ADMINISTRATION AND GEN-
ERAL GOVERNMENT ", BY CHANGING PROVISIONS RELATING TO DUTIES OF CITY
ADMINISTRATOR AND ADDING DUTIES OF CITY CLERK; AND, BY ADOPTING BY
REFERENCE SHAKOPEE CITY CODE, CHAPTER 1, AND SECTION 2.99 WHICH,
AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Shakopee City Code, Section 2.03, Subdivisions 1
and 2, are hereby amended to read:
Subd. 1. Notice Mailed or Served. Special meetings
may be called by the Mayor or by any two members of the Council
by writing filed with the City Clerk who shall then mail a no-
tice to all members, or cause the same to be personally served
upon then, stating the time, place and purpose_ of meeting, at
least one (1) day before the meeting.
Subd. 2. Posted Notice. In addition to mailing or
serving, the City Clerk shall also post a notice of a special
meeting in the City Hall where other notices are generally
posted.
Section 2. Shakopee City Code, Section 2.05, Subdivision 2, is
hereby amended to read:
• Subd. 2. Position Re- Defined. The existing position
of City Administrator is hereby affirmed. The City Administra-
tor shall perform the duties hereinafter prescribed, which shall
not include the duties prescribed by .Law for City Clerks.
Section 3.! Shakopee City Code, Section 2.05, Subdivision 5,
Subparagraph A,, is hereby repealed.
Section 4. • Shakopee City Code, Section 2.06 is hereby amended
to read:
Sec. 2.06. Execution or Contracts and City Seal. All con-
tracts to which the City is a party, in addition to being signed
by the Mayor and City Clerk, shall be sealed with the City Seal.
Said Seal shall be kept in the custody of the City Clerk and
affixed by'him. The official City Seal shall be a circular disc
having engraved thereon "CITY OF SHAKOPEE" and such other words,
figures or emblems as the Council may adopt.
Section 5. Shakopee City Code, Section 2.10 is hereby amended
to read:
Sec. 2.10. facsimile Signatures. The Mayor, City Clerk and
City Treasurer are hereby authorized to request a depository of
City funds to honor an order for payment when such instrument
bears a facsimile of his signature, and to charge the same to the
account designated thereon or upon which it is drawn, as effec-
tively as though it were his manually written signature. Such
authority is granted only for the purpose of permitting such
officers an economy of time and effort.
-1-
•
•
g G4P
Section 6. Shakopee City Code, Section 2.11, Subdivision 2, is
hereby amended to read:
Subd. 2. Succession to Local Offices. In the event
of a nuclear attack upon the United States or a natural disaster
affecting the vicinity of the City, the Mayor, Council, City
Administrator and City Clerk shall be forthwith notified by any
one of said persons and by any means available to gather at the
Emergency Operations Center. In the event that safety or con-
venience dictate, an alternative place of meeting may be desig-
nated. Those gathered shall proceed as follows:
(Subparagraphs A, B, C, D and E remain unchanged)
Section 7. Shakopee City Code, Chapter 1, entitled "General Pro-
visions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including
Penalty for Violation" and Sec. 2.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor"
are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated
verbatim herein.
Section 8. After adoption, signing and attestation, this Ordi-
nance shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City
and shall be in effect on and after January 1, 1981.
Adopted by the City Council of Shakopee, Minnesota, this
day of , 1980, by the following vote:
Yes:
No:
Mayor - - -- -- .
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Prepared and approved as to form this ___ day of
1980.
— City Attorney —�
(Published in the on
19 . Proof of publication attached.)
-2-
•
•
r
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: 1981 Pay Scale Resolution
DATE: December 10, 1980
Introduction
Upon arriving in Shakopee, I was informed that two positions were
not included in Resolution No. 1719 adopting the 1981 pay schedule
for non -union employees.
Positions
The two positions involved are: (1) Assistant Police Chief and
(2) the custodians. I have reviewed the status of the Assistant
Chief with Tom Brownell and his recommendation, which I concur
with, is attached. I have met with the custodians twice to
explain the city's position and listen to their concerns. Their
two primary concerns were: (1) that the two employees at $5.00/
hour (the senior custodian is at $6.00 /hour) would not receive a
sufficient increase if it were limited to 9% because of inflation,
the quality of the work they do and the responsibilities they are
gradually picking up as the senior custodian prepares for retire-
ment. (2) that holidays should be pro -rated on the basis of hours
worked rather than provided only "if the part -time employee
actually works the holiday ". (City personnel rules). After
making a cursory survey of the pay offered custodians /housekeepers
at the county, hospital, nursing home and the City of Chaska, I
feel 'our present pay scale is reasonable and fair; and does not
need adjustments beyond an annual 9% adjustment to reflect the
inpact of inflation.
Recommendations
The performance of the employees discussed above has been accept-
able according to city staff. Therefore, I recommend the adoption
of Resolution No. 1761 amending the 1981 pay schedule as follows:
Assistant Police Chief - $150.00 /month above the top sergeant's
pay
Custodians - Senior Custodian $6.54 /hour
Custodian $5.45 /hour
JKA /jms
'l', ,,,,, z t, r d y r•"'_- -
,;` ` �' . „ „.\ City of Shakopee , �
/�1 •r A K ° P F , '. POLICE DEPARTMENT t .�
ra
\ ' 1 + i ,
t� i _ �j 476 South Gorman Street K $ , e1 1
J ' .0 ""4 • >�B? , 1 r .
- = �� � SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379
P �i E Tel. 445 -6666
p .1124141 14
':n
CI 55379 ,i ,y',
r
. r
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Thomas G. Brownell, Chief of Police
RE: Salary Increase, Deputy Chief of Police
DATE: December 11, 1980
On December 19, 1979, John DuBois was appointed to the
position of Deputy Chief of Police without consideration of a
salary adjustment.
Due to the responsibilities of the pos i_t:i.on and the employee's
excellent performance during the past year, I recommend a salary
increase of $75.00 per month to become effective January 1, 1981.
The salary adjustment will also establish a pay differential
between the positions of sergeant and chief of police at a reasonable
level of mmpensation within the existing salary structure.
TGB /jsc
P.S. The $75.00 recommended is in addition to the $75.00 approved
on December 18, 1979, making a total differential of $150.00
over the top sergeant.
.John K. Anderson
go CS EWE a J'" ZOEECE
Prodeedines o thu
Shakopee City Council -' ;- December 18, 1979
Leroux /Hullander moved to authorize the position of Deputy Chief
including the additional salary of 4;75 per month and that this
person being considered for this position, would be at the rank of
. Sergeant, as per the recommendation of the Civil Service Commission.
Roll Call: Ayes - unanimous
Noes - none Motion carried
Discussion was held on the approval of the specifications and the
authorizing of the purchase of 1980 squad cars.
Cncl. Leroux stated he felt local businesses ,should be given the
chance of presenting bids or quotes. He also stated his objection
to the need of a "Police package" in the squad cars. Lengthy discussion
was held on these concerns.
Ward /Harbeck moved that the City staff be directed to take the e= xisting
specifications and go out and get quotes for. the 1980 squad cars
and come back to the Council with these quota,. Motion carried with
Cncl. Leroux voting "no
•
Cn.cl. Ward questioned the sale of over -the -bar liquor to minors
and questioned if the Police Department was aware of this and what
action was being taken.
Chief of Police, Tom Brownell, was present and stated their awareness
of this problem.
Ward /Leroux moved for a 5- minute recess; aL 10126 PM. Motion carried
unanimously.
Harbeck /Ward moved to reconvene at 10:37 PIVI. Motion carried
unanimously.
Harbeck /Leroux moved that adjournment be no later than 11:30 PM.
Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux /Ward moved that when the City Council does so adjourn, they adjourn
to 5 :00 PM on December 21st, for discussion of the Ziegler Industrial
Revenue Bond request. Motion carried unanimously.
Harbeck /Leroux moved to open the public hearing on the request for
Industrial Revenue Fonds for the Ashland Chemical Co. Mo ;ion• carried
unanimously.
Ward /Leroux moved to continue the public hearing on Ashland Oil
to January 15, 1980, at 8:00 PM when representatives could be present
to discuss their exact proposal. Motion carried unanimously.
Vice Mayor Reinke asked for questions from the audience. There were
none.
Leroux/Ward moved to open the public hearing on the consideration
of amending the Shakopee City Code dealing with Variances and
Conditional Use Permits, providing for an appeal within seven days
of the Planning Commission action. Motion carried unanimously.
Ward /Leroux moved to table action on Ordinance No. 35, An Ordinance
_gf _the C of Shakopee Amending S'hakonee City Cnrin Chanter 11
•
Position Title: Deputy Chief of Police -
Accountable To: Chief of Police
NATURE AND SCOPE OF DUTIES
Under the direction of the Chief of Police, the Deputy Chief is
to assist in administering, supervising, and directing the
divisions of police; to keep the Chief of Police informed and
bring to his attention policy matters requiring decisions beyond
the authority level of Deputy Chief and to assist in implementing
such decisions. The Deputy Chief is responsible for the super -
vision of patrol sergeants, investigative, and administrative
personnel.
•
AREAS OF ACCOUNTABILITY
1. Commands, directs, and supervises the activities of the
patrol, investigative, and administrative divisions.
2. Coordinates and evaluates the patrol and investigative
functions of the department.
3. Provides direct supervision and coordination of the investi-
gative and police- school liaison units.
4. Supervises difficult cases, renders aid and advice to subordi-
nates, assures all legal requirements of criminal and traffic
cases are met.
5. Assesses training needs and makes recommendations to the Chief.
6. Reviews all reports to insure assigned duties are performed
and accurately documented.
•
•
•
7. Maintains discipline and enforces department rules, regulations,
•
and policies.
8. Assists in the preparation of department rules, regulations, and
•
policies.
9. Assists in the preparation of the annual budgetary request and
control and direction of expenditures as directed by the Chief.
10. Prepares press releases for dissemination to news media following
guidelines set forth by the Chief.
11. Performs the duties of Civil Defense Coordinator for the City of.
{
Shakopee.
12. Enforces the law the same as any other officer and when necessary
due to manpower considerations, performs duties ordinarily per-
formed by subordinates.
13. Performs such other work as directed, apparent, and /or assigned
by the Chief.
14. Assumes full command of the department in the absence of the
Chief of Police.
•
- 2 -
4 - -
RESOLUTION NO. 1.761.
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1981 PAY SCHEDULE
1.3E IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA, that the 1981 pay schedule for the offi.cer.s and employees
of the City of Shakopee adopted by Reso I art. i on No 1719 is hereby
amended by adding the following:
Senior Custodian - $6.54 /hour
Custodian - $5.45 /hour
Assistant Police Chief - $1 50.00 /month above the top sergeant
Adopted in _ session of the City Council of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this clay of
1980.
May or of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk +------- - - - - --
Approved as to form this
day of
City Attorney
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, Deputy City Clerk
RE: Amending The Current Resolution Adopting A Policy
Concerning Condemnation of Easements for Public
Improvements
DATE: December 11, 1980
Introduction
•
Resolution No. 1643, adopted July 1, 1980, set a policy for
condemnation of properties where easements are needed in order
to construct public improvements. The resolution provides that
city staff may negotiate a fair and equitable settlement with any
property owner while the condemnation process is underway.
It was Doug Reeder's intent that the resolution be amended
to read that city staff may negotiate a fair and equitable settle-
ment with any or all property owners while the condemnation process
is underway. This will make it clear that everyone gets fair process.
Recommendation
Offer Resolution No. 1760, Amending Resolution No. 1643,
Which Adopts a Policy Concerning Condemnation of Easements and
Land Needed for. the Installation of Public Improvements, and
move its adoption.
JSC /jms
RESOLUTION NO. 1760
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 1643, WHICH ADOPTS A
POLICY CONCERNING CONDEMNATION OF EASEMENTS AND LAND
NEEDED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INPROVEMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA, that Resolution No. :1.643, Which Adopts a Policy Con-
cerning Condemnation of Easements and Land Needed for the Installa-
tion of Public Improvements, be and hereby is amended by substituting
the following paragraph for the seventh paragraph contained therein:
"BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution does not pre-
clude the City staff from negotiating a lair and equitable set-
tlement with any or all property owners whiie the condemnation
process is under way and the staff is directed to bring to the
City Council any negotiated settlement which may be reached and
if these settlements are approved by the C;i ly Council Lhe con- -
demnatl.on action shall be discontinued."
Adopted in _ session or the City Council of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this clay of
1980.
Mayor of the City of: Shakopee
�
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of - -- ,
City Attorney
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, Deputy City Clerk
RE: Amending Approval of Link's 2nd Addition
DATE: December 11, 1980
Introduction:
Resolution No. 1684, adopted September 2, 1980 gave approval
of the final plat of Link's 2nd Addition with requirements /condi-
tions which actually did not pertain to that property actually
approved by the Council for platting. The City Attorney, Mr.
Coller, has advised me that the resolution should be amended by
deleting the requirements not pertinent to this plat.
Background:
The preliminary plat included lots 6 and 7 of block 27
(facing Naumkeag) and lots 1 and 2 of block 27 (facing Prairie
Street). Staff recommended approval of the preliminary plat with
the following three conditions which were for the benefit of the
lots being platted which faced Prairie Street:
1. Submission and approval by City Engineer of road
construction plans.
2. Execution of an acceptable Developers Agreement,
which would have contained the road construction.
3. Utility plan approved by S.P.U.C.
After discussion at the Council meeting on September 2, 1980,
Council decided it would be in the best interest of both the City
and the developer to give final approval only to that part of the
proposed plat containing lots 6 and 7 of block 27, which lots
abutt Naumkeag. This allowed the developer to commence develop-
ment on these lots now, and allowed problems concerning construc-
tion or vacation of Prairie to be resolved in a timely manner,
before final approval on these lots.
The resolution prepared for Council consideration at the
September 2, 1980 meeting was amended to include the final approval
of lots 6 and 7 only; however, it was not amended to delete the
conditions that were then not pertinent.
Alternatives:
1. Adoption of Resolution No. 1759 will clarify any future
questions which may arise on whether or not these condi-
tions were fulfilled and if not why.
"c
2. By not adopting Resolution No. 1759 the resolution expects
the three requirements to be completed (which are not perti-
nent) before the plat i filed (which did not happen).
Recommendation:
Offer Resolution No. 1759, A Resolution Amending Resolution No.
1684 Which Approved The Final Plat of Link's 2nd Addition, and move
its adoption.
JSC /jms
1 1
RESOLUTION NO. 1759
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 1684 WHICH
APPROVED THE FINAL PLAT OF LINK'S 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1684, adopied on September. 2, 1.980,
approved the final p l a t of Link's 2nd A d d i t i o n with conditions,
and
WHEREAS, the preliminary plat did include more property than
dial the final plait; and
WHEREAS, some conditions contained in said Resolution No
:1.684 pertained Lo that part of the property contained in the pre-
liminary plat, which was not contained in the final plat..
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF S1- IAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that Resolution No . 1684, Approving
The Final. Plat Of Link's 2nd Addition, be and hereby is amended
by eliminating requ.i remenl s numbered 1, 2, and 4 contained there
in.
Adopted in - __ _ —__^ _ -- session of the City Council of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this _ — ___ clay of
1980.
Mayor ()I the City o f Shakopee ; ._.-
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this day
of , 1980.
Ci i y Attorney — - - -- __.—
li . )
rt, 1 • -- \ .:1. . ---..._,
-..?...:c3...,:12- .- 7 \ \ \ \ e ..--
, il ''' c i .: 1 1 \_- _ . - 2 1 :i, v- ..: V.I \ ..._- '------ ---
t- ,,,, • k X..---" _____.--- ,_____--\
li.,,
. _._,. .„, ______--.....,,„:„..
.,...._..
,,i • \ A _________„.„,_„_„„,_,._, _
:: ____ ..,....,..:„:___.,.....
..„... . ____.
" ......,,, ..,,,„.-,,,,_„.,____--
n ..... , \ ', ...,
:... i r : .-,T.50...-::___.-
.. __..... \ " .. \-1 . 1,1
. . , ..A _. _ --... : * • " - - - - - \V\\\\ ' -1 1 '
I \ @ 1 :). -1.-- -- \ .. . Cr:-- I ., 1 - \ ‘- \ _ ,•:% 7 1",;•5 1 - - • •••/,' _...------ \
\ : _ ---]
•AAA:-\ \ . -- ± --- .
' i l l ii,'
__.,.,,,in....,.t....T-5"‘rt.'•-•'., • i--:). r ; .. A '-'' ----- - - - r ..... . • ,
r "..\:. \ ■ ..- ' 4 ' - •
\ \ ' ' f1.11.111 [,.
'
,.., \ -.., L .., , e,.. .,....
\ . .y,,
'' . . \--\- -- - ..1 \ ,
\ \ , ,,, A ,__,,,c. ..,,
...--- y: . ..,..\._ \ \ r ,,,,, .), ..,
\ ,.: . ,..
\..1
, ,:: \ ' • • --•1 , :A - . '-4. •1'.4';'..
to 0 __---- ./ ... % ... \ r
\ ,.- I ___ 117 \ .11. . / 4 ...! fr. 0
\ i ..--.., .....: t j r;. r.
"...,* ..,.. , ------- ` - i . 1/ to ....10. ' i
-,..,.. -.--„,... 4 ' ." \ • - 7..:1 4- - '‘'..
:''' ' •. i \ \:___\,\ iL "."--/-:-. P,D''' ., ;
\. . ___ 4 -. ;i.
,:ill_‘.... [1.111.1.t.;
1 \ _ - A.77--, - ..
.-\ --\:-1 •
\ \-- ._ ,1,..„,,_, ______.0:t. ,,..,.,,, •_:„.....,........,,,:„..,,,,,...„„_7_4„:„.„,_
A. -\ ,k, FUTILITY
; -7 1 • -
.
�- ' B '
...:t | � �
�� | ~/ �
uc'-J
`�
L . C) ' �
(..D ��
40'
���� [l; , __-'-
-��~ �o
�" uUN|CIPA L o '
5EK,|C[ •-
OU|LD\N� -�
-~ -�=��` �
• / ~- "~- ` `--- P L...o /^
• '-- I N
---
.
-------- --_ — -_' -_-__ _-_--_-_-_ —
'-_---__ \ / _ __
� /�-T7� / //Y/��- ° �4 ' ��
-- -- ' -- ^-- c/ /-/ ��
1�:T/T(ONE[� DATE
--_-
-----------_'---- Y�/���EZ �------- /
� • /� /D — ��
, z�-' L/ /[� � / � ��\ � �- �/
/\�� ��[). / / � ��(�AL[� /
.--'_-__-- ___' '_ ``�.--'--_'___-----_'-__-_'-__-___ �__-'-- `
RESOLUTION NO. 1684
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF
LINK'S 2nd ADDITION
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee has
approved the Final Plat of Link's 2nd Addition and has recommended
it adoption; and
WHEREAS, all notices of hearing have been duly sent and posted
and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an oppor-
tunity to be heard thereon; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has been fully advised in all things.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SHAKOPEE, that the Final Plat of Link's 2nd Addition, described
as follows:
Lots 6 and 7, Block 27, EAST SHAKOPEE, Scott County, Minnesota
according to the recorded plat thereof; and that part of the
vacated alley in said Block 27, described as follows:
Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Lot 6; thence
southerly along the southerly extension of the easterly line
of said Lot 6, a distance 8.00 feet; thence westerly parallel
with the southerly lines of said Lots 6 and 7, a distance of
120.00 feet to the intersection with the southerly extension
of the westerly line of said Lot 7; thence northerly along
said southerly extension a distance of 8.00 feet to the
southwesterly corner of said Lot 7; thence easterly along
the southerly lines of said Lots 7 and 6, a distance of
120.00 to the point of beginning.
be, and the same hereby is approved and adopted with the require-
ments that:
1) Submission and approval by City Engineer of road construc-
tion plans.
2) Execution of a acceptable Developers Agreement.
3) Approval of a Title Opinion by the City Attorney.
4) Utility plan approved by the Utilities Commission.
5) Park dedication to be paid in cash.
6) Approval of drainage plan and overiot grading plan by
the City Engineer.
r ' • , I
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Administrator
be and the same are hereby authorized and directed to execute said
approval Plat and Developers Agreement.
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota held this 2nd day of September, 1980.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST: •
City Ad ' istiZtor
Approovv d as to form this / day
of 14 , 1980.
City Atto ne
•
MEMO TO: John Anderson
City Administrator
FROM:. H. R. Spurrier
City Engineer
RE: Final Payment Requests
DATE: December 11, 1980
Attached are Resolutions No. 1762 and 1763. These resolutions
call for the final payment of two contracts; one for the
Demolition and Site Grading and the other for Borrow at the
Macey's 2nd Addition site.
The $280.00 has been deducted from the demolition and grading
contract. That amount represents the value of the work not
performed by Wangerin, Inc.
The amounts for payment are judged to be correct and proper.
All of the lien waivers required for this project have been
received.
Recommended Action:
Adopt Resolution No. 1762 and Resolution No. 1763, which will
authorize final payment for the demolition and grading contract
and the borrow contract to Wangerin, Inc.
HRS /j iw
Attachments
1
CITY OF SHAKOPEE •
INCORPORATED 1870 11111818182118211EMONINOMBIZESEM EL,AasiszaugiectausamenalmensasusanuAranisba
; (,f
129 E. First Ave., Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445 - 3650 '41
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
CONTRACT NO. 'DATE December 11, 1980
DESCRIPTION: Building Demolition & Site Grading - Minnesota Street Project
CONTRACTOR Wangerin, Inc.
ADDRESS 8610 Harriet Avenue So., Bloomington, MN 55420
The work on the Contract specifies' above has been completed and
accepted by the City.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 23,500.00
'AMOUNT OF CHANGE ORDER NO. THRU NO. $ - 0 -
TOTAL CONTRACT COMPLETE IN PLACE $ 23,500.00*
. LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS $ 20,425.00
FINAL PAYMENT $ 2,795.00
APPROVED:
r
ity E g�ncer
/P2 e
Date
*Total Contract ($23,500.00) less $280.00, work by others.
TT •• • 1 .
- g of
lil. ,;01,IJ'l' I ON NO. 176;)
A lie o l trt, i con Ac:c : 1r1, i m Work Orr The
Public Improvement Program
Mace,y's 2nd Addition
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City
on June 10, 1980, Wangerin, inc . , of Bloomington, Minnesota, has
satisfactorily' completed the b u i l d i n g d e m o l i t i o n and site grading
for the Macey's 2nd Addition Project., in accordance with such
contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, 1J1:i' IT BE RESOLVED ISY THE ( ;i'l'Y COUNC :LL, OP '.f1-IE
CITY. OF SHAKOPEI , MINNESOTA, that Lhe work completed under said
contract is hereby accepted and approved; and
BE 1T FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk and the Mayor
are hereby di ' c :Lccl L(I i :;r;rrc: ;r pr'opor ordr 1'c)r• the 1'i n i1 payment
on such contract in the amount of :,,2,79,,.00, taking the contractor's
receipt in full, upon receipt of lien waivers fr'orn all sub-
contractors. •
Adopted in Adj . Reg. Session of the C i t y Council of the City
of Shakopee, Minnesota, held 1.111.} 16th day of .December, 1980.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
A'1" T 1 E ST :
•
City C l e r lc �-- -- - --
Approved as to form this
day of lc d0 —
City Attorney
C
CITY OF SHAKOPEE •, k
ING0RP0RATmo 1870 P yiYf '''y'�` 1
19 E. First Ave., Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445 -3650
� i•.f s �
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
CONTRACT NO, 1)A'!'iS December 11, 1980
DESCRIPTION: Purchase of 6,000 C.Y. of borrow material - MN St Project
CONTRACTOR Wangerin, Inc. — . - - - - -- — --
ADDRESS 8610 Harriet Avenue So. Suite 201, R1nomington, MN 55420
The work on the Contract specified above has been completed and
accepted by the City.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
$ 9,000.00
AMOUNT OF CHANGE ORDER NO. TI'IR U NO. $
-0-
TOTAL CONTRACT COMPLETE IN PTACE $ 9,000.00
LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS
$ 8,100.00
$
FINAL PAYMENT 900.00
APPROVED:
kJ:6J limb
r ity En „iLeer ,
Date
/,
An Equal Opportunity Employer
p r
_ Gv
+
RESOLUTION NO. 1763
A Resolution Accepting Work On The
Public improvement Program
Macey's 2nd Addition
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written eoriUr;rr•i; : ; i fried with the C i t y
on April 8, 1980, Wanger in, Inc . , of Bloomington, Minnesota, has
satisfactorily completed the borrow for Macey's 2nd Addition Project
in accordance with such contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI-IE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the work completed under said
i.d
contract is hereby accepted and approved, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk and Mayor are
hereby directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on
such contract, in the amount of $900.00, taking the contractor's
receipt in full, upon receipt of lien waivers I'r•orn al] sub-contractors.
Adopted in Adj. Reg. Session of the City Council of the City
of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this IGt ;h d:i,y or December, 1980.
Mayor of the City of .hakopc:c.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of - -, 1980.
City A t; t o r n e y, "------------ - - - - -- -- .
C 7CL/ *
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Tim Keane, City Planner
RE: St. Francis Hospital C.U.P. Appeal
DATE: December 11, 1980
Introduction
At its regular meeting of November 13, 1980, the Planning Commission
gave unanimous approval to a request by St. Francis Hospital for a
Conditional Use Permit to develop a parking lot on the northwest
corner of 4th Avenue and Atwood. This decision was appealed by the
resident to the west.
Background
As part of its overall development plan, St. Francis Hospital has
included this request for the development of a parking facility on
lots 3, 4, and 5 of block 45. The attached case report discusses
the issues and site plan considerations. The appeal filed by the
resident noted concerns of the parking lot's impact on devaluing
their property value. The hospital has submitted a letter indica-
ting they will construct a 6' high wood privacy fence around the
parking area that abuts residential property. The proposed land-
scaped plan has been approved by city staff.
Alternatives
As noted in another memo to Council on this agenda concerning the
parking problem around the hospital and courthouse, there are
parking alternatives under consideration.
Summary
Even with the best case where Block 57 is cleared for the develop-
ment of a parking facility in the near future, block 57 would still
only provide from 190 -210 parking stalls. This falls short of the
parking needs for the hospital alone. Add to this the county's
parking needs and it is clear that the clearing of Block 57 is not
the only solution to the parking needs of the hospital.
Recommendation
Staff finds the parking lot propo to meet the criteria for
granting a Conditional Use Permit and would recommend approval
of the Conditional Use Permit as approved by the Planning Commis-
sion.
TK /jms
DATE: November 13, 1980
CASE: PC 80 -42C
ITEM: Conditional Use Permit, Parking Lot
APPLICANT: St. Francis Hospital
LOCATION: NE Corner 4th Avenue and Scott Street
ZONING /LAND USE: R -2, Urban Residential /Vacant
AREA: .58 Acre
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 11.04, Subd. 6; Section 11.26,
Subd. 3E
FINDINGS REQUIRED: 11.04, Subd. 6A
PUBLIC HEARING: November 13, 1980
CASE HEARD BY PLANNING COMMISSION
APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL:
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit in order to construct a parking lot at the above location.
The proposed lot will accommodate 64 vehicles.
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY:
Surrounding land uses: North - R -2, Single family house
South - R -2, Parking & Single family house
East - R -2, St. Mark's Church
West - R -2, Single family house
• Land Use Plan: Urban Residential
CONSIDERATIONS:
1. St. Francis Hospital is in the advanced planning stage of
a $5 million upgrading- expansion program. The City has requested
that the hospital address the parking problems in its improvement
plans.
2. Section 11.05, Subd. 3E of the City Code requires 1/2
off - street parking spaces per hospital bed or 54 spaces. The hospital
presently provides 54 off - street spaces. The hospital's planning
consultant has identified the need for 250 -300 parking spaces.
When the improvements are started, parking spaces will be lost. The
proposed lot is part of an overall parking plan that consists of
a new shared parking agreement with St. Mark's, the request of
temporary closure of Atwood from 4th to 5th for parking, and continued
acquisition of property east of the hospital for future parking
expansion.
• Case No. PC 80 -42C November 13, �1 80°
St. Francis Hospital Page -2-
3. The hospital improvements consist of (in part) an expanded
emergency room, remodeled front offices and entryway.
4. The proposed parking improvements are on Lots 3, 4, and 5
of Block 45, Original Shakopee. The property is being leased from
St. Mark's Church and is presently sodded and vacant. The improve-
ments consist of bituminous paving, curb and gutter and a bituminous
drainage made in the northeast corner of the lot.
5. The overage slope across the lot will be 3 percent. The
lot will drain from the southwest to the northeast. The swale
will accommodate the five -year storm to a depth of 1.5'. There will
be a catch basin with a 12" pipe to the storm drainage in the street.
The catch basin and pipe will be maintained by the hospital.
6. The stalls are 9' x 18' or 9' x 20' with 22' driving aisles.
With a narrow (9') stall, the width of the aisle should be 24'
to accommodate a one - movement swing into a stall. Full -sized cars
may have to maneuver more with the 22' aisle. Staff would recommend
that the angle aisle of four spaces be eliminated in favor of wider
aisles, 90 degree parking along east property line and a wider
landscape strip between the parking area and the property line.
7. The entire lot will be boardered with a 6' opaque fence
abutting the residential areas to the west and north. Staff recommends
that the height be lowered to 3' in the setback areas to insure
proper sight lines. Staff also recommends the fence be of attractive
design, preferably cedar or redwood rather than chain link with slots.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit Resolution
No. 266, granting the construction of a parking lot for a hospital
in a R -2 zone, conditioned upon:
1) Construction of a 6' high wood screening fence
(3' in setback) along north and west sides.
2) Submission of landscaping plan to be approved
by the City Planner.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
Approved Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 266 with the
conditions as follows: 1) Construction of a 6' high wood screening
fence (3' in setback) along north and west sides; 2) Submission of
landscaping plan to be approved by the City Planner; 3) Park manage-
ment system which would free the parking lot on the southwest corner
of 4th and Scott to make it available for late hour employee parking.
TK /jiw
. • ?-) C1.-
•
-- _ . •
,
- *
. . - . --
- -
. -
l, ' — :::. •z:::.:::::::::::.. 4 , 0.11/G
- . ___ . _ _ R . -- - - • , :.• ., , ..:::....... .• ' ''''.
• - — - - P I . — ...*,,, - :::e - • - •:' 4 9f11VP -.- .. ..'. 0 ' vi
_. ._. ‘.,...„,.,,,..,.„ .......„... . . . , _
,
.\.17,,, • • . _
t ,
t 2 - ' - ' . , , .•.'.:.:',. ‘ ■ '.... 1 '' ,.:. , i . .: ., : . /.: . . , ,.,"....: ir ''' go
vc. _ - - - . --;:- ‘ . 1 ,''...,...., _ ,:.......7.1".5.7.-....77.4.,:.....,:::.:'... '‘ ' i • • .0. , , . -. .ti Vili 1
1 __." i /
.C. • :". :4.7- r7.7.;.71:3•4,,::,:.,:.-,;:.:.:::::M*,,',':.':•-•.1.,),,o Oa,-
--.- ' - 4
\
:::.,,. r ..,i .1“ •
." V,.* 43 kii
ba OV, '
0 0
i , lei
AIMS . tr, • - ' ,.' .
,11... xmt... . ,,,,,. 4 -A:,
0 a vg. . rj , 10,
..;,
, ,
Am! ,,,,,,,,,,goot--
- .-.4 g' . .
le , . . 4. . i •
rkao I‘
00
'
.;- ,1
. ....,......___ , ;4 __. -..: ....4-1., -............_-_-..-.._
Umilin
SO ... II
0
. h....,- ...,,
- ....;',40 4 ' ' . - r -C-1-T o r \ti,IR •
-..... ---
- \:
wit.1./ .....-Al $1101 '
• _U-TC-----.-;.;-1aC"-- -6 VOA \ ^ ' i'0 1--L .
V ; -,._,ostsoo,
• •
......__________:--------_. - --- • ..-,4 An ' • ' - 7.
'1* \% , -:: . . . . .41
-ii" 14. 1. ,-.1::7' : 4 . Ili „ , -.. -!
i
11111 ,,
110
4,-Av
• .1
. 1 -.• . lit I - 1 6 , „,, . 000,0A m ,, . k . t. 0, I 4 '
40
. IIIIINVA 11101 - 0 0L ' .1 . v _ Ig140XMI''*1'1. ..
i . .r OA • • ' 'Al ',,'.:::',.::4:::::?.::•01'... 7'
' 't■ 1 11! ,•:•C-.1.7:4, C------"
\ ... .• A ' .. • O
......: : '
..0C.O.S
%t%' 0* • , ...„„„:„:„:„,„:„.:::„..,„,:„..
. * A II • „.:,,,„.::,..„....:::::::.
,_,_,.. .! 1611 ' "
_................
.......
.....
,,o ,_.5 ,„,- ... ...
11111 \--
a 1 •
- i
111111 '
- - \
A . .......611
lit '
-,,
, illigi I t c •Ii\ 11,10,■.ki ir ,. _.1111si
101 .
„A I I ' • ‘,, . • • V .
\ . , - * f •
7:TIT?O r i\ - iER I14(1)11-ANt____. )
• (DATE
N. iAi. lor-Ne7---) iv* e s0- 1 - r
100 (----
,SE NE. LOT LOCATION SCALE j PG
. . . .. ..---
Ta•-•'
4 i 0
•
ao
i . .
MOTE LUietiNG SHALL BE •
6 INTEGRAL BITUAHNOUS
CURB V ..,/
•:'.. , _
":.'. 1 ,:..• ' 1 t" ;v.; ! .7, ' .
• , • :., :' '..,,., 'T., '. 1 !,..• .
• ....-...---______________-_--_ ••••............"---... ------- - --..-- ... .: .' .. :. .•4: :. -.410::' ' 1 '
----'----------------- 1 .'... ..e.
i ......• ' ....?: fii0;•,,'.. •____ .. . 1 12 CRAvEL DRIVE
. ., _ ___-- - ..---.. .....
4 •-• 20 -- - - - - -- 4 - -- i •'' ;..., r ',.....:,:: . ..; . ....
----- 1 ce C II • 1" • . • • • •••‘
). i :i , i 4 f i l : : ":
I HAHKING I 1 I
......./ , • .. • 4'14 .; .7. '
Hi umcNrJS s
„ SPACES •••• 9 0 •! ..:5 . - t 1 '
•
: • •. • li .., ' ...'''0",.
''''''•:.(• . • ' ill ''.•;1.,:fl s •
..?..... 1 , II . 2 ■‘..... 20 ' .... 22. ..i... e - ..f_ . V. . 3... l' '. 1 ,' ..,: ,.;;',.,
1 ..— • 1 20
- 2 I 4.-- —
4 •44'.. ". : •
. .
— — - — /!8
... 7 . _ ,,.', • ( t•1'''• -
t k".. ', . • ,••\:.
... § l' '. r; ..:. '
. ..)
...., / °' ,..1. • s.., ... 1.0 ... ;
o ,,,
. ,„ ,
..,,....• t'16, 9 ,
i
. •P: • - ••• •
-- - • —
... ,.• „, . ._
u ,.., ..---- t •a; ".. „." 7 i. 1"c! "L •,-.' "
4 ',I ,,• ....• • '' ',', ''-.7c
.- _. ___ • El 8 8 .., . . , , t , ,
- - - ,...,....-- . ,T,
PI I
40 40 .
', — -- r, 1 ..-'•.. $ . . '
-.... . - . .5 : f : '`'"" • . . :. : ,r ‘,
- vi■: ,
ii ,...
. .
__. _ - _
..:'. t :::i ' . !:. . i :.! ....: • :• •
— ,... ■ ;-,•;.:.? ..:: 45.... •'. I. ;.(...%. i:
• •••,.
41 K 1:1 . . . . • c ' fi '' a^ 1 - ;'• •
, it • 4: 1 ' • • 'I, .,• i .. .
04 12 SPACES ci• 9'0- ..„ '
" • ' .-- -1 -..,. 4 !,; ::•?J•
1 1 ■ ‘'-'.:11:* t ::::. . 4.
.
-
•- , ',..r It " 4 . c.;'
''. //. ,.. 1 4 . ( ' . " ....% W 1 . ...:' .. . 1 •
.40 • .../' ' 1. 7'4'41 1 ''' l j VI; i i
• • ,' iv. " 4
6
24 179 72 . : .4 ,, ..T, 1 . .? ;-" .:. ! 4. . .%1
. ..I
_ _ /•• .• „T ?I, ".,
,•-tuA rc•-• ( 'us T PAv•NG : ' ;, •1 1. ‘ - ' 7t . N
• .: .1, :44 % k • •
.'>:;.i.....,..,. -•• , J,LI. ,
.•••' \,.....
, _...______.________,__
--
• . •0.,..:. ..4:' / • • ; • ?.1
t' 1 . • t" '•:, Z.... - I : .....'..... ' . " • ' . .
• ... .
• — • ' . • • '..i ' 3 .'>.•'. )....: J;;,,r,F` g.
• -. • ,.' • r ..L,x • ., - .) 4,,,.. ..., ., - • ,:t
cit * , '' :.. ' ..k :, - i" ;'e- • •.' " : •''..' ... di .:`. • • • ' -, .. '• ' ' ' ••••• • • - , . '•••; • • ' '...• • • • •• • •e:;";;.1 ..•, '"-*-". : '1,.,•:. -i4:: .• I
••• •,,, ,,', - ' ' • —
• . • . . ' . : • , • : , -..! s•:.. s ..; . .-: • .„ • , ‘ . • ,;.1 f , - 1-•:i: ..-: :•:•: v,;,•!; ''.:,',.,.....i-:.:•.-•.•:,•, .. • „.•,-,
FOURTH — AVENUE. - .'..— •';-' •-•...::-.::':;••••• ' -,... • — A`ii•-
..214,./..e.:.,,,-..... . . , ....
• •.'- r... ; :.I , , ■ .. .2.: • . , , , .. ...). 4: ' :_,, . : , ...„ :-.:..., ' • ..,, ...., ; ‘0. li. • •••.• :,..' .....-:;•••;:•••,..;,: r •, ,-Z r. .- 4
-'.• , i•,• • .4.. ' •• , '.,.... .• " .!' A '', ., .. • t 'S • ..: ... • '. • ; -, .; , . ;
1 .• • , • •• ..;., . • • -, , ,, , . ..., .., , . ". . , ; , ,• '. • F ;':'-•••., :=Z;z:' PIL f i..•••+Th'ii ;
..',:•-• ,i4,1 • ,, .. T..? ,,, y,:.-.4 ., ; .....;:: .1/4.... , ,..- : .t., ....; :,,. • , .." Y , • ...,, ‘ . ...1, ;1 •• . •• P. ; ••• , • '4,:::% 1,14", 4 ,.. i .A.'41•1;•!..' .,44:.,,,,s1'4,...,
L
,,.,," „,,,.„,....,,,....„,,,..,,,..,,,..,,;:„.../;...,...,,,,•:„.,,,•„,.:,..., •r , • -::,' '.; ,, .:. ,:. .:'• , .1'4, t.;' ': :` • • .. 1 " ' •P: .i.. . r.r;t:,.,:
: ..' .:;• ;:i . i ics; ,): ..sr.:-WL .," ...i' ,..:., '' 1 "i . • :' `..• - •• • • L x, ,,.:•••• i•i lc ). A.1 ,. '"::' 4 ,': k. if../..,-..r
' `r .--" ' ' ' '''.??;F:J,11;1A
f..." ":", A 1 I i .. ...:40,47110"
Z:1 Kt ki .:....-4: • ' . Si
:: 4- yi. : : r.. ,I' ?P.; i •11,
'4 '' " '•'•.• .",. ••• • - '• • :4 A:
: '.: L :'',..•:r.S - 41 . 0 i ‘;',"., .... ,
• I ' ii:/-'4'.....y.i.idadist.?
PARKING STALL LAYOUT
i
0 40 :0 t0 ao
G.■. - .... - •••=721.............T.91.1
SCALE '01 FEE T
•
----,--
• ? Gt..---'
•
...,:.; i4
.. '. '::: ..:•:;
NOTE : CIRCLED ELEV ARE
TO CUTTER . V. .-
CONSTRUCT C6 IN ' : ' : '• ir.16,.::
ACCORDANCE WITH
••• ' •1•'''. •
STANDARD CC TAIL \ ... .: r "1 7
IN SPEC BOON
t. • \ 4 l'• 1■ IA .
‘ \ • "
,
------ • -..‘ ‘.. - - • .../". i;;*- - i. e.''' . '•":,,,: ' -1
• v:.: f .- .• :. 4.:• 4, t, -
________- 1 t I
le GRAVEL DRIVE •
LE9 WALL TOP • ' ". ., I,: •,. • ..., • I s t . y .t 0^.
. • 769 t .. ..'":90:1,367$1..ki ,
• __________::: _ _:_:... . , - --- =. - z_ - _--" . i io , .. rt, •;s,,,f,:i: 47..,. -.
t r5( -----••••-_____ • (1."_,I, , ca , , \ e i. 4.; : f ' "r 4 •..
_ POND4NG AREA .... ••.. ' •‘ \ , ,Fr . . .. •I t , . . ..
LIGHT ... 7865
-• - - - T2E E"v 6, 1'41 • 1 ' ''' \ : \ ... ' :,. ...• ;:',:" • ': ■:/,'.,_• '
- .-
----
-- - -^-,..., -.<- T69 •-• \--. ---:-.'- - .-- -\ .7 \ ‘ \ l • •-''' a:
---„,...........„ CliE12 ...- yr ,o4. • .---:
cliep, Ca;.\ 1 rE \ , , 4 : ,) • ' ... .....1.:
P179,., ' •
1
\
-- ''" - - ''• ...
___ _ ... _. „., -■.--_,..,..,...:___.,, • .
• % \ ' "„..,„6 ••••:- :.;',.. '
• •
- , --...-- I __,.. r4.• ••• f
:::-_ ......... _ ; riir , • (....,. . • ,
t t I
"14.: . '''.,1" :..g•
. -..., . .' t ,
, t %
t ..:,c. :i ,s,•-.7.
- - . t aqi .. •,:-. , • ..; .
_ - 790 ---- --- -"■-................... -...„..
- --- - --- -.-
• \ lt,;.•41 4 1- •-... 1 *.Ni:y"
P90 '''•
.......... ',.. \
• i : • , ,,,
t ''• -- .;../.'''' ;l' • , 4...:„ .1 It
---.. • • • `1• ' I fr- NI,
2 • .-- -..
---...z ‘ ii 1,
. _ , I.
- - _ - _ - - 0 ..,_ ■ ; %
_ _ - -
---____________.
" - -------- 1 1.. - .. • •• _ 1 • •09 . ,...';4•Ho L
. - .... ,
.!., 5 .' FP: t
-. .. ,
• \ • . %.• .
............ s • r . s . t-•,.
••-... .. _ .
' \ ' • • • '• • '7
---- ........_ ' • 4
,
\
. • , ,.. .:,...,;;.„
.____ •,, .
-,,_ ,
_____
,..
_
-, ,
. .._ _. ; -...;,...;1-;"4:: , 't,-•
-.... • - ' - v • iril;.e.s.*I.v
--_____..
a . ... ..... .... ...., , ‘,
t ' - - _ :, i• I .... ;,..• . .
T' , _- . • ti.:7••• L•••••.;o:,4-
, ... - 01 ; :f•:_ i . :ti-L - Li;.•,"-,, 4 'r - g: :,,
, , •
s
„ •
•
..., , s, ....,_ ...-- ........ V . •
L
...,..
.._ -------------- . ,r • i. "" i--
-._ : s . • r-- 4 ,...\&
________,-,..-______ '4 \ . . • •:, 1 '-catY1
7 •
c • ,-) 179 72 4 : -4 , * '/' ' • . ..N Ht.' . -,,,,
, , 1 ,,, ,.i .. ,:::• _ ,
, : ::,C„: , ;„ • ,-,' i e 6 - 1 , t7
' 794 ---- •••"' /
'''\,..'
... ...
' . •I ,••-• 0 ..../. 41. h ., .
/ .
-........,- --.-...• --.-..--- - ..•. ... -- --• • . T -- ` - - -- ---- •'" ------- 7 • • .•-•-••••-•.--, -."---- . -, 7( ----- r - 7 ,- ;1 4.,-.r.:' : ' v ...•:.s •• ;,: .";.. , •'' . 1 1
• • • ' ' ; •' ''..... r' i •! t ilit .‘: 4'•1 16 $44$ .4 . •;‘: . • 11 01 % '5'‘''.4 !; ' t?,-
•,;; ,.. i i 4 , .j...■ ... ., • • ‘.., . . t . . t . , , • ,„0. ■ • :. tY : • le ,..' ,.. . :T i ,,, : '., i ,... • /•:-.... .,' z 1 • 1 -...:•r• I ...: : 1 c. ..,........ip - -••■•"11 . 4r9 4i7. •
. ' • k lb;i ' !.I.1% V T.L• ....,' ': a • r , t • 't . ••., •.... ::,.../ r, . .‘. • ..;:e. f.„;•, • .-, ::i!' ;',1,......-,,.. . „ '.',,,,. c xtrA' ,. ...„',..-4, 4:, . ,,,. .,:•,.”0
' .:. 4; 4.4' . ••,! !,..: : , . ,, •.. :''.. ; ■ '''' ';' • •• .1 i ** ' ': • 4" il. .? ' ..-'1•,: , ' l' " ''''.4 . 4.:'N‘ .. -:1' le . '
t'ltP" ' . . ' ' • .. .
Q V RT H U , • s o( Y:' t. ' •'-' " ' ••• e " ' . • .. • . .' II .',Z.' ,g • 4.f. • 'V 'fk`i& L■N ‘,:f :'t,,'"It i A'4 '
e' - •*, •''' f . •S, '•
2 . 4 ; ' \ , '` ' , , •
...-31,:itv-,,t1),• • AV ...,,,...• ‘‘.,.....,"...{ ...1 4, 4 4 ,, • • ''. a -
'. : ' 4 . s'," ::. !.:.!!' .*,;? C.. SV.,'' 14 -. . ' T6V ,. •
1 -' illi • ...i .1 ;: ..i
, f .4%.11,-; 4. reA :- Adi.. I rf.' ' *?:'„lit.; .;;`.:,...P:.!. t.t.:7;* : !.il." ...,. '41.V ...1 :,.?" 1 9' ..
.,.. _ <4 , ...• ,.. , 1 , x „ ,,, ,,.. ..;,: , . „..,4 . . ...'; .. -.r l I.• 1„ • . ; e Al- .14'1; .: . 1 - .- "°- - o. ' "V" .•":' - '14:1 • . 1 .
.i 4. ' ,..,e-4-i .•:.4... - -, .... '• - . 4 . ".. '.,-, . • ''',...:-- I'''. ' • 4'. . " _'' s.: -- •• ' .:...... •• • .1.-- '''''' •'• • .: . ' I ' Y , ....' 4 : • • I j i ' • , ' sti" '•'•
t . • 4 .. k.. • 0
4. • .4. ..• .,‘ ... , : t :.-.., P: v .,.. ,. .!-.•
1 t. 4,,,, i ....,.., i c• 4,...„...: ,..,
..z. ....-..,. i . ......>1.•:4.:1,,;;$..- . 1:.-'.! •
•
DRAINAGE •
i •
0 .0 20 .. „ .0 40
- 1,47■2G". - 1 ,...
SCALE IN FEET
•
PRINTED nr,T 1 6
1 Newby 0.,1111, /$.I lin■ 04.
sp•dfiellti..., el /•••4I rig pfsfoor•41
W m.4 et moor •rny direct oupwrIr1•41.
awil 1141 1 ol. 1 &ay t •go 41 lo f • d oeflo ow
REVISED ,, --,,• "'#-* ISII A ELSON AND ASSOCIATE NC- S, I te0.100# 1.■• time .1 M. .tort. el
.v:
1.4INSIII.nt4C EM:1741.F.11• 1 AND St/in 'Aims
------' 'i):,':,,Itt % 30,.
awl. we.
-- A: t 1.:47A 9100 WEST BLOOMINGTON FREE wAy '
IstOOmINGTON. MINNESOTA SS411 ,
, - ?HONE 16171 BEA 3271
DATE 10/14/80 BY P CO FILE . BOOK JOB SHEET OF SHEET
...-
F.L. Welter
y 1, 35 W. 4th Ave.
Shakopee , MN 55379
November 17, 1080
City Council
City of Shakopee
129 E. 1st Ave.
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Council Members:
This is to app ea1 the City Planning Commission's approval of a conditi.ona1
use permit to operate a parking 1 oc on lots 3, 4, and 5 of block 45. As
owner of lots 1 and 2 of the same block, 1 feel. this parking lot would de—
value my property and interfere with my rights as a property owner in a
residentially zoned area.
• Sincerely,
I'. 1,. Welter
/v�1 J/? %. � � _ _ •
( Name) (Tit1e of
l v•.,/ 7 -" Acknowledgment Receipt
) r y—
// - / 4 7- < 1) --
(Dace)
•
10'' \2v
L
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Tim Keane, City Planner
RE: Red Owl (S & W Industrial Revenue Bonds)
DATE: December 11, 1980
Introduction
At its meeting of December 2, 1980, the City Council tabled a
public hearing concerning a request by S & W Properties for a
$600,000 industrial revenue bond. The Council recommended
that the applicant work with the City staff towards resolu-
tion of questions concerning parking, landscaping and rubbish
control.
Background
In its initial review of the site plan submitted for this I.R.B.
request, the staff identified certain site design concerns.
The developer met with City staff and submitted a revised site
plan incorporating:
- Construction of a paved 30 stall employee parking lot
at the southwest corner of Minnesota Street and 2nd
Avenue
- The provision of 107 parking stalls on the block of
the shopping center. Staff finds the total of 137
parking stalls meets the City standards for parking
requirements.
- Construction of curb, sidewalk, boulevard, and land-
scaping on the west side of the hardware store.
- The trash dumpsters will be enclosed in a wood fenced
area to the south side of the building.
- The proposed landscape plan has received preliminary
approval from City staff.
Staff Recommendation
Staff finds the site development plan to be substantial improve-
ment in the overall working of this center and gives preliminary
approval to the site plan.
TK /jms
9 C.,
MEMO TO: John Anderson
City Administrator
FROM: H. R. Spurrier
City Engineer
RE: VIP Sanitary Sewer Interceptor
DATE: December 11, 1980
On December 16th, the Council will conduct a public hearing
on the above - referenced project. Provided the Council determines
that the project shall be ordered, then Resolutions No. 1764
and 1765 must be adopted in order to maintain the present
schedule.
Resolution No. 1764 orders the project and orders the preparation
of plans and specifications for the project.
Resolution No. 1765, approves the plans and specifications and
authorizes the City Engineer to advertise for bids.,
The plans and specifications for this project have been ordered
previously in Resolution No. 1423, adopted September 4, 1979.
Acquisitions of right -of -way required institution of condemnation
proceedings in order to acquire easement for the project.
The construction plans and specifications have been reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer.
Recommended Action:
•
Adopt Resolutions No. 1764 and 1765. These resolutions will
order the project, call for the preparation of plans and
specifications, approve plans and specifications and authorize
the City Engineer to advertise for bids for the VIP Sanitary Sewer
Interceptor.
HRS/ j iw
Attachments
_
RESOLUTION NO ] 6/|
A Resolution Ordering An Improvement And The
Preparation Of Plans
. ^ 81-1 VIP Sanitary Sewer interceptor
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1752 ol' the City Council adopted the
2nd day of December, 1980, accepted thu rcport and fixed a date
for Council hearing on the proposed improvement of the property
described in Exhibit A attached hereto, by interceptor sewer; and
WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the hearing through
publication of the required notice was given and the hearing was
held thereon on the 16th day of December, 1980, at which time all
persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard
thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT 8ES0T�V}(A BY THE CITY COUNCIL OP TUN C�1,Y
OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1. That the improvement., as described in the report prcyarud
by William E. Price, P. N. ^ Suburban Kmi ncez'lng dated November 26,
1980.
2' William E. Prioc, Suburban Fmi:rerlxF, is hereby dc:lgnatud
as the engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and
specifications for the making o[ such improvement.
Adopted in :o::iu// or the City Council or
the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
1980.
— - '—�-- � |City '�---'-,
Mayor '�| x� or ::;nxxopcc
ATTEST:
City' Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of , ]pU.
City Attorney --------- -------
. r 9
RESOLUTION NO. 1765
A Resol.utiorr App.r'ov i nh; Plans And Specifications And
Ordering Advertisement Igor Bids
81 -1 VIP Sanitary Sewer Interceptor
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution N o . 1 7 6 ' I passed by the C i t y
Council on December 16, 1980, W.il I i,nrn K. Price, Suburban Engineering,
has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of land
described in Exhibit A, attached hereto, by sanitary sewer interceptor
and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for
approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL, OP THE c.0I.Y
OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a. copy of which is on file
and of record in the office of the City Engineer, are hereby approved.
2. The City Em i tree: r .;h,a I I prepare and cause 1.o be inserted
in the official paper and ill the Cell:;thlWtiOH I. rl l c;t.i a an advertisement
for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved
plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for
two weeks, shall ::specify the work to be done, shall state that bids
will be received by the City Engineer until 1.0:30 AM, on January 16,
1981, at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council
Chambers of the C i t y H a l l by the c i t y K I I 1 ' ; I rW0r• and the C i t y Clerk,
or their designee, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 PM,
or thereafter, 'on February 10, 1981, in the Council Chambers, and
that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the
City Engineer and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check,
bid bond or c e r t i f i e d check payable to t.ho order of the City of
Shakopee for not less than five (5 %) percent; of the amount of the
r
bid.
Adopted in Adj. Reg. Session of the City Council or the City
of Shakopee, Minnesota held this 16th day of December 1980.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this day
of , 1980.
City Attorney
?Di
MEMO '0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Hospital Expansion and Parking;
DATE: December 8, 1980
Introduction
City Council, aL its regular December 2, 1980 meeting;, tabled
action on the Hospital's request For $ 1 2 mi I I i on in lR Bonds
until December 16, 1980 when the Hospital, after meetings with
City and County staff, coul d present a parking plan.
A meeting was hc:l.cl December 5 , 1980 w i t h the following people
present:
Hospital - Sister Agnes
Tom Prusak
Mike SorLum
County - Joe Ries
Jim Sulerud
City - Mayor Harbeck
Bo Spurrier
Tim Keane
John Anderson
BackPround
Need - It was restated at the meeting that City Council wants
a concret solution Co the hospital /county barking; in the area, and
that it was for this reason that the meeting was being held.
Mayor Harbeck :indicated lhaL the City needed information (plans)
about the future needs, short and long term, of the hospital and
county. The following needs were mentioned:
1. The hospital's need to develop Se. Mark' s playground to
creal;e 66 new parking places, and that Planning Commission
had approved Lhis.
2. The need for 2 hour parking around the hospital to make
the St. Mark's playground parking work effectively.
3. The fact Chat the proposed construction would result in
a net loss of 30 parking stalls.
4. The need for a temporary construct ion easement closing
Atwood for construction.
5. The need to determine the future use of Atwood and Fuller
(ie could they be vacated).
6. The need for a professional building sometime in the future
to properly serve the hospital's service area which is pro -
jected. to double from 1970 Lo 1990.
7. The need to provide space and parking for the eventual
return of County Human Services.
8. The need to provide for parkin,; lost if a County Law Enforce-
ment Center is constructed.
Parking. Alteration Discussed - Numerous .ideas wore discussed about
the best way to secure sufficient parking spaces to meet present and
future needs:
1. Short Term - The Hospital and County could work independently
(the status quo) to acquire Lots in block 57. The City
stated that both agencies needed Lo work together on acquir-
ing block 57.
2. Short Term - The City could use its power of condemnation to
acquire the remaining lots and:
a. Acquire the balance from the Hospital and County and
build a municipal lot by assessing the costs to the
Hospital and the County. (This was the plan discussed
by City Council on December 2, 1980).
b. Turn the newly acquired lots over to the Hospital and
County and let them jointly (or separately by separate
ownership) develop block 57 into parking. (This could
be secured development agreements).
3. Long Term - The City or private developer could build a
professional building and parking ramp on block 57.
4. Long Term - A ramp or other ground level parking lots could
publically or privately be constructed to the north when
the need arises. (The Hospital has discussed and dropped
the idea of a ramp for the present because of costs).
Other Concerns - Several other concerns were brought up during
the meeting:
1. Preserving the existing residential. area South of 5th Avenue
and West of Scott St. (all parties seemed to concur on this).
2. Determining the future impact of Central. School..
3. The possibility that one of the existing hones on block 57
was on the historical register.
4. The concern by both the Hospital and the County that a
public parking lot that had been assessed would preclude
any other use for block 57 in the long term.
5. The need to provide flexibility for future decisions regard-
ing Hospital and County growth in facilities.
6. The need for the City to resol ve present and potential
parking needs in the area
7. The methods of. financing Lhal might. be used: City assess-
.
ments, development di.st Lax 1ncremenL, non -City funds
Hospital., County, and or. private).
Summary
It was agreed that the Hospital needed Lo move ahead now, and
that the County's plans were longer. term. '1'o assist the Hospital
(and County) in evaluating parking alternative #1 before Council's
December 16, 1980 meeting, it was decided that the City would pro-
vide the two agencies with est:i.maLe.s on the development of block
57 for parking:
Acquisition of the remaining Lots
Demolition costs (and /or salvage costs)
Relocation costs
improvement costs
Verification of houses now on the historical register
Based upon the above information, the Hospital would provide
City Council with a plan and /or commitment at Council's December. 1.6,
1980 meeting. In addition, the County would send a written notice
of the intentions with respect to the development of parking on
block 57.
JKA /,jms
•
•
•
� ��y� �� �� 8 ���������� k
• • _- \..,V _- .-- .~~ /�-�
' � / v`-
138 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
/
* vIR, •
�d E. �� �� '— ~ '`^ ~^
TO: John Anderson, City Administrator .
FROM: Larry Martin, City Assessor
SODJECT _- Block {}7, 0~S'P
:DATE: December 8, 1980
Introduction:
As requested 1 have conducted preliminary calculations on five
properties in Block 57 O.S.P., that the City may be interested in
acquiring.
Background:
J approached this particular problem ::` y'`// :ug/yuxL,d ' in which the
1880 estimated market value i: adjusted }`y the mean sales ratio of
this property type. A recent study indicated the market value to be
84'6% of ,1980 unadjusted sales price. The properties in question were
all inspected in 1878. The interior has not been inspected since. 1
did hnwov'er, drive by to observe the exterior condition of each on
12-8-80.
,
'
Please keep in mind this is not an opVro i o/`\ nor should it be construed
as euuh. It is however, a set or preliminary cxlcnlationn that may
assist in setting forth probable range:: or value.
Below l |}uv6 listed each property by parcel number and owner. Also
listed is the adjusted 1980 market value and a probable range. (De-
tormined by reviewing comparable sales). '
.
Summary of Findings: .
Probable
Parcel # Owner Adjusted 1880 Value Range
427 in 1 Raymond FricdCos $40,461 mid to high 40/e
428 in 1 Raymond ]/riedges $56 low to mid 50/s
429 in 1 Al.J. Thomas $62,082 upper SO's
131 in 1 Hildegard Joorisxon $47,124 Mid 60/s
432 in 1 Marie Schultz $57,522 low 50's
Again, ] would like to emphasize 2 points.
1) that the interiors have not. been inspected
2) this is not an appraisal, but an estimate based on
official assessment records for l980'
'
.
''
'
, .
'' ` ' (
.., DWELLING ru/'uuu'--. ` ��
'. '. '' `.� ` ■ ... �'^' o. � ' `'' / N/ . ,. ,t,: '� �
' u u,r� \ �m • '�'� '
/ '~' -- / .....,.,,,,.,.
_. �� ^' .„,.,,,!,,,
,,.
� no. ,vv*, . � '� ` '
»^� o^/:, �/ /
/
^u xu/,vu^ , _ _ '�
/ / / \ `� ` \
/ o*m*^ per '- '.
. •
»a,, men / tin. ..
• �
' heal _
'. ouun/ _ 's \ ‘ i i . .-4- , ' • • • - .r,P"6:4,.•",..::
` umix
ins __ __ ~
'u*^S Carpeted -
Lot u `=.- • _-.x._-: ' ...*.-._ _ . .
: '-, ;:',.'. : ' :11 .• . .(. 1. :. •2 • ',',, e .,1,......-,-. : -. 7 , : ...,._....... .-...?."
r;:l2;,i11������'
^x^. /.ox 'u no � � ' —
__-__ . _ .
•
single ___'-_____ - `- �
double "ox ___--_—_-- ....t.,::.-..;....:.....,:. ''
=/,,u yes
OBSERVED CONDITION: ` �
E,
J r7 /
c _______---_ ^f Z / '°^-- .
Good ------_______._ _
. , . .` . �
OwELum� /m' uvx/_-- ' ; � '
��
.. `.'��''Al x ' `n. x. �� � `
'/': l"i./S ‘i ',.;'^ '\\� „ ';
ov,r height _�_� __ _
'
no rooms -_-^' �' ` ��`
` `/ . •
^o »oou '.-
� -'' �� \ �
•
no. bedrooms ------
` • `
»^nw~/ percent - \`` '� -•
m",".,.1/".
/�^/ `' •I
'� . `� \ � AV/,/ 4 ,.., , •,,: ' I ; ! .%".,-:•::;-=, •
,/,( /'"// '' ` • � . ..
bud, 111 ` _- - " - fp,
..p.. . ^r/p|
`` -�- — - |
. �` �- � .. CAxxCE ° ' x- - �
^o^/"u'u_-_ .. ou. L - ! :�;^'^,'� � — �'� • • • -- J.1.-�:.-
`¥'"^o
1 vvm~ =^x --- -
=,u/ /o - - oo_'-
0oS[xv[u CONDITION:
|
1
`, - -' /'` (7 `
`*ii
F .'
DvvEum6 year ovx/_____ 1'.. ..... •_::
' � x � so. n� • ��)� -.
s l u r y height , •
,m .w,"� .. [
00 w/^ - ] .
•
.m. v*i,v*n, ' ^ - '
basement percent __ /� • .
/,.,"^,.'m`. ��
i �'
h°'`/ . \ i �
avLmp/ - -
uv.n ins
. 00*, C ,ne/,u _- -- . -
-
Lot /, /�. '`! 'x_� � `.-'
GAR AoE |�� �
X i^ _--'� �.��.
^ !tit cxco yes _-_-__ no .-
' --_- � _-'
single wall ______-__' --�
._ ^ ' '
�
double wall --__---.---- '. . . � -
OBSERVED CONDITION:
s "c. _----__- -
oovu
Fair l/°/ {/ ` / .
. _ -__--- - / � \ ..L, .
Poor _ _________
•
�
�� ,
- • --
G NA' E L I_ I NG year built ___.: _ t t..
- .,
. • - . _.: :....i., x sq. 1 t. _._•'::....-_'i._-...: ok--- .
. g•
., ;•';-
. • i
story height r
•
,
no. rooms ,
. :e.. 1 • , ,
no. ba Ills
•
no. bedrooms .. i -
• , h, ....,•,;. ::•- f. , , *C f ,
,•:." • 0.-:"zi...a
k l ! , , i!E ' ' ..... ' 1
....::;". .• ' R.,
Imsernent percent ..\ -- •
• -.. .
' ' ... ,:'0 ti - •<-•-''''
.." ....
baSeillt...11 I lin. - i . :•.••:1
---- -- " ." • A -
.--. .
il
heal ! ' ir • .• .
'
•:• -- , i).: ..- . _,
.. .
elecii-i,:al
•- —_----- •
--.. . •si:.:1‘,. ,....1 -...:---,-...= •- 1
•!•',',.-kt, ••11 1 ,!:
[P. ' ,•-•.; .;•••• ,,., I V I c.iL , -..ii•it t
l•'
roonls carpeted .':. ! :.r ,..,-- Lir,t EA pi — i , •
il- v s , vi • ...,. ,
: (.‘ :- qs; sf.T.%:: • ,l'i'l :.. - :.:17 - :::::,• - '': . - 1;n:•;:,'T 1 : • .tt . ;
Lot size ___ ._...., X • • t ' , --- ';',": •;' 1 : t; ,-;- tt ',' t ". 1 1- .. $1 i 1 ",F•5•P-.4.0• - -E"Pi r t t ` F111 ' 41 "* I' a •-
tu, 1 '4••• : -•- ,...%:::,..,, :!1::•:•43:7-
GARAGE , ‘.. 1
X • '- - s • ..
*. .* :...:4-. ' ** * •* * * s '" ). - 4. ' 4- -* .. --:; ,. .`'••-•;-" 11-. ` 1°- ' - ••••••:;;;; 1 :-. •:,-7=4,:t..7..014,::........t,====.-
' \ * '..** -:`':".' * * ''. : ',....:...L
a Ilached yes .
single v.••111 .. / ... : ..... • %., :-
doublewall -- - -•• • • ••••••••••••,-,••••-•••• • •• -" ...• 1.:?..,....... . ,......: ....',.1.,:zz
wired yes. no _ -
OBSEIVED CONDITION:
Exc -- -- - • - --- •
Good ------- • - • - -
Fair . , •
1 Pour _____..._ 2 -1 .
DWELLING year buill ______._ :...
. .
....4...".: . X r *. ::.._ Sq. 11.
story height ' -
110. I 00111S '• .1
....
no ba tits . , ..._
. •
no tied, aunt:, . •: . ,
',.',;•*" !I
, .
, . - „ •
. .z. 7 . : "..-... . • , .
basemen I percent
• , , . :V ,
• ; :: : ;,•,.-.,7,-;;;•t'i:!,-.f.:,,......„ .V•;"...=•:' \ i:
1).1,,,t•i11i.:11 I in. • •• : 'l • ••'..;:.:;;;:;;;;p-
', '..N ....1-: •
— a -
. .
..: 1, P.; 1 1 i . * • •
' .1 k • • 1 ' t 1 •
Iwo I
P . II T ' , '.....:-..-•.;.,\.•:.?
.•
1. ,
4,•1;!; II ll . _ .... 1. .. ; \ 4
._-. . ..
;' I1'
. .
i •-.
1,11111 MI)
• , : r • ---- -.77-7/ -4•4;,-41.,..;.-,• 4 - • 4 ' ' \••
. 4.
• • • . • - 1 2I.: pl: 5c-c''::1 'ff:'il . 1
,,,,,,, carpeted ___ _ k
• , I. v , -7 • Cf..,••••7•1„ • 4 4.1- t i.,,lr ' . \ •
•,-., •"'? tr,i' ,;•.•?. Z3'
: '•: - :,, - ..;•*.i' t;t•A•1, ', t Pit ::r.;.fl ez. 1,4/ 14
:ff :. ; ...J . I., 4: 21 2 11' ' it ' ,t- . • ”f •
1 1 iIIIIIII11111 11,14i
,;!'01,,,,,..i..,,;.,:i, ,........., .
, . :....,:h,1141.::.citg,:fem:ci.,;:, r#,,,,,••41,'1,":',V11.1..M..e,'10:1MP!:.■.(1:,,,:',
G AR AGE X : • ' . ), ,'• -... ' t ••• •• 1 4'4,, 1:.•11.•.-_,I.:,--...(1,.5Iigt,Y..14341"f".4•;,II141i0.•111:1K-;•.'...''...3..e..Ii.4.•':.,
•• •:4 P,I i I .-,,•• 4 ;', . :' : ,'':` • :%;', I
4 I,-■••••• .... ;14 -% 11110-• •e • ;- s il ,, L • 4..4 , at --.. , ^ •\ F;;%. ,--- - ' - .
.111,1c heti yes ______. no V
_ . •'. i ' '•'! -- - J
, -1 • ,-- • ■•••,...t.t.e ,•";......
.,:t;. • 1:2 :
••••• •: ,:i i.:' .
1 , • L .,• +...
*:.-- . -. - .., • • ,: ,, -
..,..,. •,
;......:•.,. 7 ...;5::...::::, ...7.,.... 7
•
single \S.• a II __ . . _ .
•-•
double %%sill ...
l' -
1.s. If Oli Vt
OBSERVED CONDITION:
E ). c • _____._______ _ _
G ood _________._._.
Poor 4- —z_ „.„..... 1
.__.___. ... .. .._.
•
. .... . . ... ............
........ ..... .... _ ..........__.„......,....... ............... .. . .
. .
• • • : . .::•....::: . : .::::............: •:•• .. .. . •• ...•..:.:,::::.,..::
.. . ....•. :-. ...•••••... - -.•:::.. ::..:.
...
.. .. . ....
.. . ......... . . .
: : :::.. :::.::„.,.::::::.„.::.::::.,.. :. , . .....„.....: :::..,:. „.. ,..:.: .„.,::::.• • . , .:..i .:::. •;:,...:.::::.:i...:: ....::: , : .. :...: •.:. •,•::::::::::,,,,
. .
• ... . . . . . . .. . ..... s ... , .. :.
• .
• . •
... .....
. ..
............
,
•
MEMO TO: John Anderson
City Administrator
FROM: H. R. Spurrier
City Engineer
RE: Redevelopment of Block 57
Original Shakopee Plat
DATE: December 8, 1980
Pursuant to your request, I attach an estimate of the Redevelopment
cost of Block 57, Original Shakopee Plat; the block located
between Scott County Courthouse and St. Francis Hospital.
Land acquisition costs were estimated by Larry Martin and are
detailed in the attached memo. Relocation administration and
relocation costs are estimated based OH current relocation costs.
The values are $5,000.00 and $15,000.00, respectively for actual
relocation costs for -each of the five dwellings that must
be acquired. Parking lot construction is based on 1981 construc-
tion costs. The off -site storm sewer is required because paving
Block 57 increases runoff and exceeds the capacity of downstream
facilities. The storm sewer must be extended from 2nd and
Fuller and from 4th and Fuller to 4th and Atwood; that cost is
also contained in the attached estimate.
The total land acquisition and relocation cost, 1 ; an estimated
$379,500.00. This amount doer:, not reel r ( :t, any cost for property
now owned by St . Francis Hospital and Scott, County.
Parking lot construction wi_ll cost an estimated $178,100.00. This
amount includes building demolition, grading and paving.
The off -site storm sewer necessitated by the amount of coverage
made by Block 57 is a part of the Holmes Street laterals and is
estimated to cost $10 This amount; does not include
any Special Improvement District cost if the project were to be
assessed.
The project is not feasible without including every element contained
in this estimate. The storm sewer is Lite only element of this
estimate not previously discussed with the county or the hospital.
HRS /j iw
attachments •
cc: St. Francis Hospital
Scott County
]ZEDEVELOPMENT OF BLOCK 57
ORIGINAL SHAKOPEE PLAT
Land Acquisition and Relocation:
From December 8, 1980, Larry Martin Memo:
Parcel No. 4'27 $ 48,000.00
4 128 57,000.00
4 129 6'2,000.00
1 1 31 ! >', ,000.00
113 2 !,7,1,00.00
Subtotal. $71),500.00
Relocation Administration $ ; ?5,000.00
Relocation 75,000.00
Total. $379,500.00
Parking Lot Construction
Description Quantity Unit Cost Total
Demolish & Remove House 8 Ea. $ 8,000.00 $ 6
Granular Borrow 6,200 C.Y. 2.25 13,950.00
Clearing :8( Grubbing 1 L.S. 10,000.00 10,000
Grading : 1 L.S. 15,000.00 15,000.00
Class V I :i.:,�� 1 1.00 I I , 7 0.00
23 Wear Course • 1,200 Ton 23.00 27,600.00
Curb &. Gutter 1 ,800 L. V. 4.50 8 100.00
Subtotal $149,930.00
10% Contingency 14,990-00
Subtotal $164,920.00
8% Technical
Services 13
TOTAL $178,100.00
�
Q« ~~
Off-Site Storm Sewer:
De3cr1ption Un1L Price Total
Remove Pavement 2,600 S.Y. $ 0,50 $ I,300'00
Class IV Base 680 Ton 4.50 3
2341 Bituminous Patch 290 Ton 38,00 I1,020'00
42" R.C. Pipe Sewer 380 L.P. 65.00 24,700.00
24« R.C. Pipe Sewer 760 L.F. 35'00 26,600,00
18" R.C. Pipe Sewer 270 L.P. 28.00 7,560.00
Manhole /| M. I 4
Catch Basin 9 M. 1
Subtotal 87,640.00
l(>Z Contingency P 6O O
Subtotal t 96
8(X, Technical
Services 7
TOTAL I04,I00.00
Summary:
Land Acquisition and Relocation $370,500.00
Parking Lot Construction 178,I00.00
Off-Site Storm Sewer IOb 100.00
--_-_--___'
1yU1'X|. t6/`],700.30
•
•
Th-
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM : Tim Keane , City Manner
anncr
RE: Historical Sites on Block 57
DATE: December 8, 1980
I contacted Sue Hedin of the Minnesota Historical Society to
determine if any structures on Block 57 were on the State or Federal
Historical Registers. She informed me that the following two resi-
dences are included in the State inventory of Histor:i_ cal. Sites.
They are not on the Federal Historical Register.
- 224 West 4th Avenue (Schwartz)
- 229 -1/2 West. 5th Avenue (Pass)
Ms. Hedin emphasized that the State Inventory is simply that -
an inventory. This designation carries no significance or restric-
tions with respect to future use. She did indicate that the Society
would like to site inspect the structures prior to development
actions. The Society may encourage the City to explore the feasi-
bility of re- locating the structures if they are of historical
significance.
I requested, a letter of verification of this conversation.
'.L'K/ jms
•
•
•
� <o Cy TY • F SHAKO E 1
. f .H4
C
iP ,I ! 129 East First Avc:nuc, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
MEMO
•
TO: John Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Larry Martin, City Assessor
SUBJECT: Block 57, O.S.P, ( %rrpplemerrta] information)
DATE: December 9, 1980
INTRODUCTION:
As requested I have conducted preliminary calculations on
two additional properties in 11] ock b7 (Parcels 423 & 433 in 1 )
BACKGROUND:,
These properties have been subjected to the same calculations
conducted on parcels 427, 428, 429, 431 & 432 in ]. (See memo
dated 12 -8 -80 RE: Block 57) , where the 1980 Assessor's Market
Value is adjusted by the mean sales ratio (.845) of this
property type, also probable ranges are determined by examining
recent market transactions.
SUMMARY:
Below I have listed the parcel number, present owner, the
adjusted 1980 value, and 1 ;hr probable range of value.
ADJ. '80 Value R tinge
423 in 1 Irene E. Pass $!)9,260 mid 'IJO's
433 in 1 St. Mary's Assoc. $'18,650 low 50's
Please keep in mind that this is not an appraisal nor shou] d it
be construed as such. It is however, ,t sot of preliminary
calculations that mny he n ed to es;Lab 1 i :;h prohabl e ranges of
value.
LDM:plk
•
DWELLING year built
. .vo..- •
, 4, :• . ..:._ --..: ..\ tv . - 1
story height ___•______•_ . .. ' ,,, ,,.....,•
"V.,..1:15.•,:-. '
U I no. rooms
I no. ba ths
, , ..,- ,? .• • • ,rirs -, ,. • ..'1,.;• ii .;• i•
' ..•,::..A;Ai:iii.. .•
'3 no. bedrooms
sement percent __:____:_:. L.
- T ip
_______.. . • . :7--n--,-,
..,, 1 IF ,I ei,.,f,,,:Ar,i.VediR, i ( I.% , k, , .." • ,,,, . 1 '''/Vi 1 f '.
.?".
ba . , I •Th , .j:"', . 1.., .., -.
ti
. ..
I ii
basement tin.
t k•,,.... 7 • lei:• ...,..: c:7 i • 1 )k -;',.•• • f ,
. Ilea 1 'i ,' i • ! I i "
‘:.:• , .
i;: . II '. . - ..•'''''
electrical L.2__
- , .. ,;,, • .1 . ,. 11
: - kf,1". . t • . . ..
,,/, ..
built ins " ,,, ,,*: :,. •,.
i 'f •)...-!. ' P .
P I rooms carpeted .
-., -
/ •
1 -7 1 '..i., ...„,..
A ;!...... - 'i,tr I? ti 1 51 N --, '
1 ,
Lot size • • " ' X . • . •
• ••';''.*4•,:., 4: r,2•3 --- A ,...-24 . " . , ... , , , ,,,,,-,..... A .,„_..„.,„,,!t=1,..
:1/4, „ Ai. '.....,',1i-:,-,-.-,•,.. !„..1....: —......„,, ,,,,
,,,,7:-A7.7.7::‘, 1 1 - 3 _ „,.. . • - •
_ •
single wall atitl
i
1, double wall -------- - -- 1/-!!;^;--------- -
wired yes . ...... .... no .. .
OBSERVED CONDITION:
1 •
E xc. 1 -1-'Z .- K .‘ - (
i
Good
Fair ___. .._ .. .
( - Z.. •■ ‘-'--) S V`
Poor
1
L
I
—
.•—
.i
1 ,
• : DWELLING year built ___ _ '_
t•
1 ' „•_21 -..■ .. x . ...1. 1 i ) sq. It. _2:2
I story height '
nu rooms . .
__... -.
. .. . ‘-
. 34 - ‘ 11_>' -:-'.:- ...1 . ' - !'' -
N 6'.
.1.
, L.1 -■ ,S"
' t 1 i ..
' A **•' • .
I
no baths
't .4 h ' • it , '''...i - .J . k.
,.1 j):; '.' •• '.- f- . :‘,1. :.
L no. bedrooms _____ _- - . ! R• ../, ' ' • 3 :.•' N . •i/ )1, •,.. , , ,,,-,,,,.;!
1
basement percent _________ ._ 1 . ':, I v , , , l' \ • \ •••: ..., ::- ' :VP":', (-:
' •. '1 ii 4 k, :// . fl \.\-, •\ \ f• I' *:. ;.‘ ,Y , ' i
., .,
. basement fin.
• .`: .i • ,,,• 1 :: i -- -- 2 ---- ''\ v 1 IA \ ') V Y
. ilea I .,,,\ ,,,.. ‘,.. y• ,- k k; \
- - ' • .- 21...." 4
I - I
'
electrical • i" : .
,,. .. i '
:64 r
1 buil I ins —_ .-.-.-. . • . . it
.,‘.
i rooms carpeted _ ■ • -V
• - • !.. ) : :ge ...........
) ______ . . _. _
:::.W,411 -.- .7 - •." : ..-.-.:•'. ‘:. .... 7 1 1 '1 '
-.--. ' i -.. :1
, ..
Lot size . ''.. LI_ _ X____ _2 ....
IntE RI / Pi I I .: ::,,'..!: Y'■; , e. • i . , .../
I . , , ,.= r Lel), / . .i -,,rrt „' ;'....! A ', A 1' \ v)
GARAGE ' X • ;-•' '
--- : PA La i g' 4 .;.4 NA : \ c9 r ij
1
,-. ., - i . LA ." ' , - ii.•:.4 1 -,` , ',:'''''40' 1) ' 'I
1 a I fa ched yes no _ _. ._ , '' •S): TI- is•: .,1".•1 .4. • s, ' 'A.
- i
lift7: N .4
i single wall
f at;... , , , ,ptia„, i -••• Jo.e= 4, r " ;r:4:4.4*:;,,00, .47.• s4,-.
1
t double wall -- -----• - •,,,-.1&:•tlfz„,,,..,, •,.•• w ,,,ifb, 2.- ,e..t.4,:•,,,eiefikt*Alt,?agf),(NO
wired yes . _ . ___ no
OBSERVED CONDITION:
:,..
LI .
---- - • ., \
... ---
Good
I V
---.----- ___ _.
(
F air
Poor
-------- --- - (
1
i •
1
• • • • . . . . .. .........
::. . •:::.•••:;•;:::•• • .-•.•• •••:':: :. •• :::::::::•:::: •••• • •:.• • .
•••••:'•:••::::: -'• :::::.:::•: • ::: .: • ...:•:••••••••••• .....; •••.: • • . :::...• , ••:. • : •• . .:•••. .:.:::.•••::, •:,•••:::.:::: •::.: •••:.:•:........:. •
.•;:::.• :-...iii: -::: . ." ...- •••:.;'•*:'•.• ,•.::•••.•: ; :. • ; : • : .... : :: :: .,...,.:• :
. • . . ..-.• ... .• • .. ........•.•..•...•.•
1 . ....
` ,,am4„. CITY 0A' Si HA ! 9�
;P 4 ".6,1 ; �`"' 129 East first Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
•
MEMO
TO: John Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Larry Martin, C i L� Assessor
SUBJECT: Block 57, 0 . . I' ,_ i ip 1 c'icn I I 111 I'o r•rnri 1. i Mn )
DATE: December 9, 1980
INTRODUCTION:
As requested 1 have conducted preliminary calculations on
two additional properties in Block 57 (Parcels 423 & 433 in 1 )
BACKGROUND:
These p.r.operties have been :sub,jee I.ec1 to the same calculations
conducted on parcels 427, 428, 429, 431 4:32 in 1 (See rnerno
dated 12 -8 -80 RE: Block 57) , where the 1980 Assessor's Market
Value is adjusted by the mean sales :ratio • (. 845) of this
property type, also probable ranges are determined by examining
recent market; transactions.
SUMMARY:
Below I have listed the parcel number, present; owner, the
adjusted 1980 value, and the probable range of value.
AI).1. '80•VrrIue R range
423 in 1 1 gene E. Pass $h , 260 mid 50's
433 in 1 St. Mary's Assoc. $48,650 low 50's
Please keep in mind that this is not an appraisal nor should it
be construed as such. It is however, a set of preliminary
calculations that may be used to establish probable ranges of .
value.
LDM : p l k
•
• • •
cn wE�UwG year built � �_�- _ • ' ` . ��
• ` �\ �
_ � ^— �f�*~~
��: . -- ' •',..`\
story height -- -
i
no. rooms ' �
'
no. baths ___•:::___ _
n
)t k . ' : „
o. bedrooms ___�
basement percent ' . -
ri
basement fin. ------ - -- -
04 heal . .
ii ' electrical �
� �
'| / built ins ' �
. �— s' titi) .• ' : 'L.'. if
l rooms carpeted
• � `. � � ' . .
1/ I ' • :piA, ,,.,, l ' I rlii .,Edi m :- .,,azi;
Lot ,i�e ��_'..:_�X
GARAGE _X-_- ' • attached yes no _____________ .. � -- �~
` single wall - - L - -
� --___--_- _� �
~ double wall -_-__ -- •
^=~--- �'
wired yes _--_----no-_-_-__-_-
.
:
• OBSERVED CONDITION:
Exc. __ /L�,�- ` (
Good
Fair
Poor
—'---------- ' /��� -, k,-.) ��7`4
_
��_''. _. ' '--_ - '
I
r.
' DWELLING year uviU_- ' _
�. � . .... , '`
�:L� 2x..i����x«� n�-�-`
` `' • `
story height
` i ■ / c4"'"— ' `
,m. rooms — \ --'
no. o^/*, _
I ^v� bedrooms __ � ` �
^' basemen! percent . ' | • ii ---' ' i
� basement /io� ___�� `� `
� »ea/ � '
|
electrical 't- '_ ___ _ . `
built in, ________ _ _
rooms carpeted ___-____-- `^
Lot size - 'L.:-- x-__':-:_'.-_' —
'
GARAGE _.'x :
attached yes no_________
single =ox _'-_- _--_-
double wall ____-_ -__ G � � � �§ �� �� � � �
' wired yes '_'_'' nv_--_-__'-- ' - -
�
OBSERVED CONDITION:
.r c*c ___ LI '� \
' � ^, ~- �
Good ____-_-- ' �
) `
pvi, CZ--P7 --------- A 7 `4 \ pvm. -----• _ � 1
1 .~�^,...., - .n' ' •••• - - , : . .. -.^^1
``', • �
'
� .•:•. �
.�� �
/;.,. ,'::::.:::::.• |.��1�� ' •
*� .:
`;:` ^.^�� , � ', '` ' . '� ` •| ��� ' � �' ' � . '�'/ , ' �' ' / ` '''
.' ^ �
|'` � '''`�'�� -^-"-^^^' • '
' � `' ^ ' ���/ !�`�'�'��' '�'/�'�'�'��i
/ .
, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR
1 .0k,-
SCOTT COUNTY COURT HOUSE 110
g, ,, ►?, ; SHAKOPEE, MN. 55379 (612)- 445 -7750, Ext. 100
JOSEPH F. RIES
Administrator December 10, 1980
JAMES M. SULERUD
Asst. Administrator
Mr. John K. Anderson
City of Shakopee Administrator
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Re: Joint Planning; Block 57,
City of Shakopee
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Following on our telephone conversation earlier today I am forwarding
herewith certification of the excerpt from the minutes of yesterday's session
of the County Board wherein the County has committed to planning in joint
with St. Francis hospital and the City of Shakopee towards the development
of block 57 for parking purposes.
I am also enclosing a copy of the Scott County Facilities Study dated
July 25, 1978 in which are set out the several options reviewed with the
county for the expansion of our facilities in the long range. I would be
happy to discuss the study with you and the St. Francis Hospital management
people at any time. I am also enclosing a reduced copy of a site plan for
block 57 which we have discussed at our December 5th meeting for whatever
benefit it may be to you.
I plan to attend the December 16, 1980 meeting of the Shakopee City
Council to represent the county in the matter of block 57, however, if
you feel my presence may confuse in any way the request of St. Francis
Hospital for industrial revenue bonds, I would appreciate being advised.
I will look forward to working with you and the St. Francis Hospital
management staff as we proceed with our planning efforts for block 57.
/ Sincerely,
1
iJ cd R i. r s
A
Encl. (3) /
cc: Sister Agnes Otting, St./Fra is Hosp. (w /encl.s.)
JFR:bn
An Equal Opportunity Employer
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Date December 10, 1980 Resolution No.
Motion by Commissioner liron Seconded by Commissioner Worm
The Administrator reported on a meeting with officials from St. Francis
Hospital and the City of Shakopee held on December 5, 1980, with regard to
the hospital and county parking. The Administrator stated that they requested
a commitment from the County Board toward working with St. Francis hospital
and the City of Shakopee in establishing parking plans for block 57.
Thereupon, Commissioner Hron moved, seconded by Commissioner Worm, to
direct the County Administrator to convey on behalf of the County Board the
commitment of Scott County to plan in joint with St. Francis Hospital and
the City of Shakopee toward the development of block 57 in the City of
Shakopee for parking purposes for both a short and a long term basis.
Motion carried.
•
YES NO
Koniarski X Koniarski
Worm X Worm
Hron x Hron_
Hafermann X Hafermann
Boegeman X Boegeman
State of Minnesota
SS.
County of Scot! f
1, Joseph F. Ries, Duly appointed, qualified and acting County Administrator for the County of Scott, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that
1 have compared the foregoing copy of a motio with the original minutes of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners.
Scott County. Minnesota, at their session held on the 9th day of Dec . 19 80 , now on file in my of lice. and have found the same to be a
true and correct copy thereof. 1
Witness my hand and official seal at Shakopee, Minnesota, this 9th day of December, 1 9 80
/ _ County Administrator
SCA Form 1
Deputy Administrator
•
): . . .
4TH AVE.
.
•-- f- —4
E-- - I IAR.OE W
- - o --I - J -__J EKIT U)
o
HILDEQAR0
IT MARYI ASSOC. INCORP. MARIE SCHULTZ JEURIllEN I - _ o - - -1
ct
1-- -- z - - -1 n
r - -- x - - - 7 0
0
. E- --- Q ----a
V) J ..) I )
-- la
7c !d 5 ,„ w
0 •
• o W
N 3
F- v D o
J
Q ESTHER YOLDENHAUER ■ ∎ �
I
LI-. . .
COItNEUU! IWCNL M!! JOHN KLIXRXAYYEW RATYOND PRICDOL! IL THOYAI
HLNNCN Y. RAYMOND TRKDOE!
•
i-
Y
IX
Q
a
• . ' 5TH AVE. .
-..) r • •
...._•_ • •---) i- .
SCOTT COUNTY FACILITIES STUDIES
P 1R P 2R , P 3R , P 5R revised
•
PRE •r, � .._ ..._
%; 7 R
SESSION OF THE _•:: )1
COUNTY BOARD CF COMMISSIONERS 1 •
Patch Erickson Madson, Architects & Planners
2311 Wayzata Boulevard, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 (612/374-3490)
7804 5 -30 -78
7 -25 -78
SCOTT COUNTY FACILITIES AND PARKING EXPANSION STUDIES
(Revised 7/25/78)
•
The following studies indicate revised cost estimates for plans P2R, P3R
and P5R. The plans are diagrammatic at this time, each based on approximately
24,000 square feet gross office area. Note that plan P3R and P5R have added
area for connection to the existing old courthouse.
Parking area arrangements are also preliminary. Actual arrangements, curb
cuts, etc., would be subject to further study and discussion with the city's
engineer. The number of parking spaces is essentially the same as the previous
report and no change in number is referred to in this report.
The cost estimates reflect an increase over previous submittals. This is due
to an unusually high cost increase in 1977 and to allow for as realistic a
figure as possible for the next six months. After a six month period, at the
present rate, the cost increase for 1979 can be figured at a minimum of 1% per
month. All buildings proposed would be constructed of materials similar to the
new courthouse and be of compatible design.
All calculations used for property values and to determine the number of parking
spaces required are based on information submitted to the architect by the office
of the Scott County Administrator.
If any of these plans are adopted by the Board of County Commissioners and
direction is given for advancement of this project, the next stage of develop-
ment would include a detailed plan and site study prior to the preparation of
working drawings and specifications. Preparation of plans for bidding would
take approximately three months for the third floor addition and up to five
months for either of the new structures.
I 1 I
�
I d
/
../ \.. : -. .. c.
•
4.05.6 4TH / .. 4iN.. PVE AVE. «
E a o
i • soa ii -- f i .
. ( . . . .. ; I . ,,...... / /r . //////
• ` j it //� % 'Hey+ CG- H yse/ 'jj � j - - • `. �;': •
I t I / / / � / /7 0/ / I • 0 '1 1 ::/%
5 7 I ,. _.
•
� (.a 0.84 ` .a afP ''`� I . 1 .. I9 �. I I . I /// , . I� ` , i c. u�i' .ii
i � c i e , f •I 0 i_ t
• 4 14 .','1
1
h a,.. a [
S . 4 e a ; . ix�d
L.i I •
�:. r
r r--
7. „It 1.1.• 5 TH / AVE '
EL iac s TN AVE avE t . 3
i f
i \ /
R• existing PATCH ERICKSON MADSON NC : - "` i
I SCOTT COUNTY FACILITIES STUD , - P� 1 — "
P
I
F
.
THIRD FLOOR ADDITION (P2R)
•
Estimate of Costs
Gross building area 24,686 sq. ft.
Net floor area @ 90% (no partitions) 22,216 sq. ft.
24,684 sq. ft. @ $38 $ 937,992.00
2800 sq. ft. penthouse @ $38 /sq. ft. 106,400.00
Elevator extension 10,000.00
Existing roof removal & preparation for finish floor 15,000.00
$1,069,392.00
Architect /engineering fees estimated @ 7% 74,857.00
$1,144,249.00
Individual office work station landscaping @ $4 /sq. ft. 88,864.00
Carpet @ $1.50 /sq. ft. 33,324.00
Land costs (C, F, G, H, I) 261,500.00
Parking lot paving 5500 sq. yd. @ $3 16,500.00
Landscaping & soil preparation • 7,000.00
$1,551,437.00
(No house removal or foundation fill is included)
•
•
• r
o ....
.....::..,..
=...r 1
i .
% 1 I i . . . .
,'..;....
i I °: ..... •••..... . -- --...-•-•' .
•
\\.....
—
1
I • .
! : '
I
AL 175.8 4TH i AVE.
l
1 t .. . --.. .•
..
.4.:.-;:. . . •
---,--- 1.3—. 1 o
E•
ELL
---7/ I.;
o..- 0 .... ... • • I .. ` '"' j C -•• •-•
: '
'' -.
1 1
i I - '
....,
(IT
- - - r I
• - • ... .. . .
;
I o I
.,./ .
. . . • . A , . ,. ,...,..
,..:
il . . • 1 __ ...] . s ;... 75 — ..:...-- - — -I. , "
I i I I I I I 11 I I t
1 ... NEW THIRD FLOOR
1==3
1 _____I 1
KT 24,684 sq. ft. gross
• _____
— i il s 1 1 .11 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
i .11
1 ,
. •
I i I i •
_ _ ...
, L. . . i
.I
. 0 ; 1 '
• __ _ . . , /
I—: I •
r- • 4, - / , / .•
_j..._ Ift': .
X : " -.• • 9 I . e or 40 .; 0. :! I.
_1!! I 1 .
ANOSZ 4r7'El..
• . 1 r? A. dr Arto
I' 1
ameivicon 1 i t(7,1•6•0
:•I --Kil"
1 iii . .1 i i 11
.....4, ]
.,... 1 .
2
t i
i 1
C1 -1---i
5` .g. il • I-- II —.1....
,
, - • 1 ,,,, • ! 0 1
= -
. 0 NI la
• mi I • • f: . y . i i
k I I ,
. i
•••• ••••••• : .— I ".7 0 1_4_— ?I0i
I •'''''' a I
;
. .
i F
.
. N. 14 14- • 10 11.1 .. ..-". " f / ''. / 1
1 •
1 i
s •:• I .....„. — ..• ;.. _ ,/‘ 7 / te ......i. .
' i.
.:.,,i VI • :
,.. • ...
1
8 t 4 14 1 4
1 14 .
I I • =
•t• ,...—___:, / , 1 1
:.' 1; 1 , : •
• -1.,4, .: I • . 4 ._.._-_ L.I r ,
.•,,,,,,,,,, ..,,,,,,. ---.,.....,..„- _,.• .,..__. . .
. .:,.„..
• 6 Ell i. i
1
I
p,
. .......1 5
•
."...;::1; IIII I : '-''' 0 i j . .... j___.- • • • ••• q''' I ; i-''-'-
1
4 ,
.111 1 .. 1 1 , , I A
, .• 3.. ,_ 1 . ,.. I 1 1'41 1!1 0 .....,,..• 3 1
, ••• • 4 .1
4 ... ... -- . 7 _" -- - - — - — - =_:-__-. : .: -.__=
••
s"Vi":•31 I
••.• •-• J 9 \
...... i •
1 :
/ . t
1.
1 t i
.
5T14 AVE
..,•
/ ,-.•. ,.,
tzu • i 0 . .._____. _________________.__.___
s 7 ..----
SC6TT COUNTY FACILTIES STUD 0 R PATCH ERICK$CNAIIADSON(INT i
. ... .. .
. *
;:e.- • i '•''
• 'A
i
: . . .
THREE STORY OFFICE BUILDING (P3R)
Estimate of Costs
Three floors @ 8100 sq. ft. per floor 24,300 sq. ft.
Connections to existing @ 1100 sq. ft. per floor 3,300 sq. ft.
gross -- 27,600 sq. ft.
Net floor area @ 80% net - - 22,080 sq. ft.
•
27,600 sq. ft. @ $37 /sq. ft. $1,021,200.00
8,100 sq. ft. basement @ $26 /sq. ft. 210,600.00
Elevator 30,000.00
Remodeling 30,000.00
$1,291,800.00
Architect /engineering fees @ 7% 90,426.00
•
Soil tests 1,500.00
$1,396,644.00
Individual office work station landscaping @ $4 /sq. ft. 88,320.00
Carpet @ $1.50 /sq. ft. 33,120.00
$1,518,084.00
Land costs (A, B, C, F, G, H, I) 362,500.00
Paving @ $3 27,000.00
Land preparation & landscaping 20,000.00
Total - $1,927,584.00
(No house removal or foundation fill is included)
l'
______ _____. i ..
,• . I y \\,_. ! ,
.. ...... . . _. . 1 „
......_ CM ...... l'
4 TH ' AVE.
E, 05.4 ti
I 1 II
4 "ike, .ifer,
*... lill •
c.:__________.:)_„...____L__ _ ___ _.- .. _ _I-- -- ,J ,
, ..--:----- --".-.: ..- ..:::. - 4-------032 -T— '; -
• i c .. . — 1 , _, ,. -- .....L.d 1 I O5 72 —
li .. -... \
/ 2 ....:_ . _ TT_...' , ,...-. 1 .—
/ NY
6
_....1 .....I. • .. ••., / '',Y,
' t, '
• ..? ..' • - - •I 1 • /, %, --.-.::-.-7. ,
...
i I
14 14 14- --I
14
71
A
14 14- 14-
-] PF
• ii 1 • --
0 I .
1
/.. r 1-.7- [ _ 14. 1 .1,, •
.....,..... ....., Th ._
...,
, ......,
,... ,„c.. ,,,r. •.• ••.,.. .... 3 :I fi ;
r 0 I ig t; 0
$
Et net) E> : . 1T 1, 11 !. ?.• t . .
• !
1 • AISM 771
IMPI■ • ....,- ha*
■., ,
a .1
• a d i f 91 ti
' 1 d Flo 1
I • PL
• FL.
. • IC I
fa . 4 ■
,
t ' .
I- . 1...Z •
. . II 'THREE STORY BUILDING
e
1 .
— III
11. .
At A' • •
...... L
Fl000r: 8 r: 81 1 00 sq. ft.
100 sq. ft. • • I --- / / -1 1
8 14
• 1
14 1-
t4 14. 14 - : - Third /
Floor : 8100 sq . ft .
1 .=.... 02 eas: 8100 sq. ft. • • •
•• . •
i I
. .
. -
..._ _ _41
si 1 •••Iff
- ,... • • • • • • • ----;
........ ii. :7' c '
.I •,-.._ ••• ..,
• 1 T• i :
i . I. I 1 I ' 1
111 I w
' '‘11'... ,, til.... '' 304 7 • _ _ ___
.•.' 1 1 / .
j.11'1C) "
.1 I . L.... :r...._,.
,......
,... ......7
i • 11,..i.;
..... ..,,,,
..,...______ ., ..
-1 ::11 • - r i-1 7 71 - = ; ...:•• 1 \---- .
• t li !
,r. i' • ,AL Mat
I
5TH
't, "to 5 TH AVE
1 .....\ /.....-
SCCCIT • COUNTY FACILITIES STUD16___Ce3-R------------.-------------- ---- -- - -----
. PATCH .ERICK$ON MADSON (IN
L
. ..
. ■
• .....; .
,.
. _
•
TWO STORY BUILDING ON EXPANDED COURTHOUSE PROPERTY INDICATING VACATION OF
FULLER STREET (P5R)
•
Estimate of Costs
Two floors @ 12,000 sq. ft. per floor 24,000 sq. ft.
Connection to old courthouse @ 1,750 sq. ft. per floor 3,500 sq. ft.
gross - 27,500 sq. ft. ..
Net floor area @ 80% net - - 22,000 sq. ft.
27,500 sq. ft. @ $37 /sq. ft. $1,017,500.00
12,000 sq. ft. basement @ $26 /sq. ft. 312,000.00
Elevator 30,000.00
Remodeling 30,000.00
Allowance for future third floor @ $3 36,000.00
$1,425,500.00
Architectural /engineering fees @ 7% 99,785.00
Test holes 2,000.00
$1,527,285.00
Individual office work station landscaping @ $4 /sq. ft. 88,000.00
Carpet @ $1.50 /sq. ft. 33,000.00
$1,648,285.00 •
• Land costs (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I) 446,500.00
Paving @ $3 /sq. yd. 33,300.00
Landscaping & land preparation 25,000.00
•
(No house removal or foundation fill is included)
•
Fuller Street Vacation:
Bury power transmission line $ 26,000.00
New storm sewer 8,000.00
Demolition & Paving 10,000.00
$2,197,085.00
/...;
... •
. •
-%--....,:f ., •
, , . • 1
...:
\..... 1 ,
, ......
i . .
, .
...... ...
. . 1 i • - -
1 ,
..
E
4 TH i AVE. I
i 1
.. AL 125-6
'" es,. I
.?
i ___ = ,...,„_, 4,.. • g....._—_._ ge. Iv ••• .. •. ....
..,....i..*:; •
.
. . •: - ": ,71 C"... '-----().4 _9:1_ .12- - t. --- i
. _ _ ._ ._ ........
. , (----
. k : •;., , , ..• 202 72 • 'I I . 0 • 1--
- i : , I ,.•:,..;•:,
• • ..
i . )..../ . . • • — 7 / 7 ? 7 , 7 1/ / /// ' / ' ' '., - -.- . 1. ... _ . . _ __ 1
• ///,,,/,/,•,/,,•.;///;/. '',..___ ' I i
• - 7 • , 7: / ."....= !,;- 1 e .
..„ ;,,.// 0.' :// " CLD i • ' ■
i
i ': ,..
14 U 14 , - . / ../// •,,' /. /
/ ' '' —i• _ . 1
•
• / / /// / //:-::..
".-- / /*I •V • ,
..--- / -Z //24 /
I I
224.22.1.:k
... =MN INIIIIIIMMUNIr Iiiiiminefflw ...m •
4.r.':: , ..4.
UR 011$ ..:. ■
I
Lotsabcdefgh1 : .
t) 4
/ ]
1
% 0
. Et 1284.1 2t •'• Z •- " 0, -
, ' AMESAMMINI AMOASSII AINIMIBMI111 /1111111M.111111 : •• ' .
t
"P tp7 1 , . ' • - ..• , „.
,‘ , 1 .......... e,
' p" •I'' .___. I
L..
. 1 •
1 • e yi: I e...
0 :. , .'!
__
. if •• '0 i I, x ••
i; •
4-stq ...
. .1 3 - 7
7 24; • I] T ' i' 72 7 / ,///- - 1
° • I — 11EW BU11.0111G
. a
1 1 .
'''.. I4 14 14- 14- 14 14 14 14 85.
...,. 1/2.:
_,.. . 1
,
" I -
/ 7
, I ,
I
.: First Floor: 12,000 sq. ft. I r a 4.. ,,'..• A ; .:;:: :
..., ii : .4III:::• Second Floor: 12,000 sq. ft. •4•:::
' I
I Basement: 12,000 sq. ft. I I
; I L_•____ _ • , • • .
_ _
k I
1 - — --
• - %. P-.- 1
:,, ii ''' . - _ 'a :,--,,,:' k. ',..• : .. ' : i. ` -
.. ,
.. • I__ k i
---
___ 3 ----;...- ,
....----- ___
—.7 7 _17 \\ I 1
efk,
•• - ••
-
•••••:44• .:.1
1 ■-__I
•
jt. le. • I , 2
•
■
5TH 'AVE. 0 22 52.2 5 TH AVE - 1
II-7•• i .. 2
A
—,;!:
— —
-----•
:I —IN\ -\ / I
...
-'' i -' S6OTT COUNTY FACILITIES STUDIES f; 5R PATCH - ERICKSON rviADSON NCI: I
PI a-
• •3
•
•
•
.0." • '
St.Francis Hospital
325 WEST FIFTH AVENUE /SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379/(612) 445 -2322
December 12, 1980
Mr. John Anderson
City Administrator
Shakopee City Hall
129 E. 1st Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Re: Resolution
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Enclosed is a copy of a Resolution passed by the Board of Directors
of St. Francis Hospital supporting the development of Block 57 for
parking.
I would like to submit this information for the public record when
the City Council meets on December 16, 1980 to discuss our Industrial
Revenue Bonds.
Best wishes.
Sincerely,
V / i/Ave..—
Thomas K. Prusak
Director of Operational Services
TKP:fpl
enc.
•
v�� 1
CITY SI (. =
SPONSORED BY THE FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF ST. PAUL, MN
RESOLUTION
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
- ST. FRANCIS !HOSPITAL -
SIIAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
•
Motion :passed by unanimous vote of Board members.
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE DEVELOPMENT
OF BLOCK 57 FOR PARKING
WHEREAS, St. Francis Hospital has experienced a critical parking shortage over
the past decade;
WHEREAS, this parking problem has been i ntensified by competition for existing
on and off street parking space with Scott County employees working at the Court House;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that St. Francis Hospital agrees to plan in joint
wi th the County and Ci ty to resol ve this problem to the mutual benefit of the three
parties ;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Ilospital supports the development of Block 57
for parking and or other use
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Ilospital supports the City exercising its'
power of eminent domain to condemn Block 57 to facilitate the (level opulent of the area
if the County and the Hospital are unabl e Lo purchase the property in a reasonabl e time
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Hospital views the development of Lots 3, 4
and 5 of Block 45 into employee parking as an integral part of •its' comprehensive parking
plan because of its' relationships to the existing Emergency and Employee Entrance.
1=i nal conmi tment by St. Francis !Iospi tai wi 11
depend on the financing tool used and other •
considerations which will be resolved to the
mutual satisfaction of the Hospital, County
and City.
I, Sister Joanna Metzen, Secretary of the Board of Directors of St. Francis Ilospital,
certify that the foregoing resol ution was presented and approved at the Board of Directors
meeting the lath day of December, 1980. •
Witness niy hand and official seal at Shakopee, Minnesota this 10th day of
December, 1980.
Subscribed and sworn before nie
this 10th day of December, 1930.
tiota Public c .�i _.__- -__ -• -_ -_
Y stc.r Joanna i•i�!:��rl
Secretary Board of Di rectors
HELEN EMI
N n — W U/
C 01 CWhi
My mm tot N 2 . 1985
~ Law Offices of
7
KRASS, MEYER & KANNING
Chartered
DEC
Shakopee Professional Building 2 1980 Phillip R. Krass
1221 Fourth Avenue East Barry K. Meyer
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Philip T. fanning
(612) 445 -5080 ail OF SMKOPEE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Phillip R. Krass
DATE: December 10, 1980
SUBJECT: Acquisition of a Municipal Parking Lot
Dear Mayor,Members of the Council and City Administrator:
I have been attempting to research the question raised by Mayor Harbeck
relative to the possibility of creating a municipal parking lot between the
hospital and the courthouse now, while keeping open a future option of a tax
increment program which might place an office building and parking ramp on
that parcel in the future. Naturally, the parking ramp would have to replace
any lost parking as well as provide parking needs for the building to be
constructed. No one knows at this point whether or not such a plan would be
*economically feasible and if it is not, then it simply won't happen.
My research and my discussions with Tom Hay, our bonding attorney, lead
me to the conclusion that there is a way to create the parking lot now and
retain a future option for a tax increment program involving a ramp and
building later, and yet, keep control of the entire process within the city
(or the HRA).
The method I recommend you consider if this is your desire, is to handle
the entire block as a tax increment program for urban renewal and to acquire
the property, remove the present buildings, and pave the block for parking now.
The bond supporting such a program would be serviced by contractural agreements
with the hospital, courthouse and any other benefitted property. The contracts
are the key since we cannot assess this project and retain the certainty of a
future building and ramp.
If we have the contracts and, therefore, the income to pay off the bonds
needed to create the intial parking lot, and later a private developer comes
along to build a building and a ramp, and the ramp provides replacement parking
for the lost parking lot, together with fulfilling the new building's parking
needs, and if the increment will pay for bonds necessary to construct the
portion of the ramp used for replacement parking and the building owners pay
for the rest of the ramp, and if all of that is economically feasible, the city
will have then brought in some future tax revenue, provided for some future
office building facilties, and provided for the needed parking.
No one recognizes more than I the number of "ifs" in the previous paragraph.
One of the problems with those "ifs" is that there is simply no way we can, at
this time, determine whether or not the second phase of this program will work
economically. However, if we obtain the agreements we need from the parties in
question, we will have our parking lot and, therefore, you may conclude that the
acL
Mayor, City Council and
City Administrator
Page 2
December 10, 1980
future economic liability of the second phase is immaterial. If the parties
in question are not agreeable to entering into such a contract, then we are
back to the condemnation approach outlined in my previous memorandum to you.
Yours very /,
KRASS, ANNING CHARTERED
00(42 . rass
PRK:ph
•
•
L ?3?)
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Administrative Assistant
RE: Technical Assistance for Assessing Potential District
Heating and Cooling System Projects Competition
DATE: December 8, 1980
Introduction:
At the November 24, 1980, meeting of the City Council the
Mayor requested staff to look into the above listed competition,
as related to the possible siting of an NSP power plant in
Shakopee. I have made a few initial inquiries which I will
herein report.
Background:
In 1979 Northern States Power (NSP) announced that Shakopee
is one of eight sites under consideration for a new 200 - megawatt
coal -fired power plant for the Twin Cities area (see attached
NSP Metro Update).
The above listed competition provides federal funds to
identify potential district heating and cooling system projects
to community- development - block - grant- eligible cities. Study of
the application and background information for the competition
indicates that a district heating system in conjunction with a
power plant would provide a good basis for entering the competi-
tion. Gary Grufman, the League of Minnesota Cities Energy
Specialist, has indicated that a viable application should
provide support from potential district heating suppliers and
users with coordination and support from municipalities and
appropriate state agencies. I contacted Mr. Stuart Fraser at
NSP to get an update of the current status of the siting process,
and to inquire about their support for a feasibility study of
co- generation district heating in Shakopee in conjunction with
NSP. Mr. Fraser indicated his support for the concept of dis-
trict heating. However NSP has pushed back its plan for a new
facility by at least three -to -five years (ie from 1989 to 1994),
and Shakopee is only one of eight possible sites. Therefore
it appears an application submitted on the premise of heating
supplied by NSP would be tenuous.
Alternatives:
The City has three possible alternatives in regard to com-
peting for technical assistance for potential district heating
and cooling system projects competition.
1. Apply for funding for a study of district heating and
cooling based on co- generation with a potential NSP
plant.
2. Apply for funding for a study of district heating and
cooling based on an alternative source of heat such as
municipal waste incineration with heat recovery or
industrial waste heat.
.3. Defer application for funding at this time.
Recommendation:
I recommend that we defer application for technical assistance
for assessing potential district heating and cooling system projects
at this time. Although NSP is supportive of such a project, their
future plans in Shakopee are too vague to develop a strong applica-
tion which involves co- generation as a source of heat. Although
an alternative source could be considered, there isn't adequate
time to reasonably explore the alternatives and develop a competi-
tive application. The application must be completed by January 14,
1981, which gives only one month for study, with two holidays in
the interim.
If the concept of district heating is judged by the Council as
beneficial for the future development of Shakopee, preliminary staff
time could be expended to promote it. It is possible that there
will be a future cycle of funding for district heating, or that
costs of development could be borne by potential users. Legislation
is under consideration at both federal and state levels to provide
authority to bond for district heating and cooling systems.
JA /jms
attachment
l J
• -t i L
---, J . LJ U 1 Li
s ac
R !a a • 'PP—
Volume I, Number 1 31 Oc1.ober 19.7',
TWIN CITIES -AREA SITING PROJECT
Northern States Power Company (NSP) will he publishing the NSP
METRO Update to keep the public informed of a study we are doing
on a proposed 200- megawatt (MW) coal -fired power plant for the
Twin Cities area. The plant, as announced last July, will be
designed to provide electricity and piped hot water or steam for
space heating, water heating or industrial use.
NSP is now studying the engineering and environmental impacts of
eight- possible Twin Cities -area locations. Three of the sites
under study are all existing NSP metropolitan plants. They are
Riverside in Minneapolis, liiyh Bridge in St. Paul and Black Dog in
Burnsville. The new locations are areas within:
*Fridley, immediately north of the FMC Ordnance Plant
between East River Road and the (Burlington Northern
Railroad tracks
*The Evergreen Industrial Park in Coon Rapids north of
85th Avenue NW and near Coon Rapids Boulevard
*Cottage Grove, west of the 3M Chemolite plant
*Rosemount, immediately west of Koch Refinery
*Shakopee, adjacent Lo the NSP Blue Lake peaking power:
plant near Highway 101
(Please see map at end of newsletter for site locations)
Some of the sites are being studied for a possible second 200 -
megawatt unit•because uncertain electrical demands in the early
1990s may require it. NSP will continue to review this option.
All eight locations have rail oil-barge access and sufficient water
supplies from either the Minnesota or Mississippi. River.
NSP is looking at possible sites now because it to i.nc]udc
input from the public and local communities in its final site
recommendations to governmental agencies. Citizens can forward
comments and questions to the NSP office that serves their area.
(Please see the list on the last page for the NSP office nearest
you.)
MEMO TO: John Anderson, City Administrator
Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment
Authority (HRA)
FROM: Jeanne Andre
RE: Installation of Equipment at 200 Levee Drive
DATE: December 9, 1980
Introduction
The City of Shakopee has, with the aid of a grant, acquired
kitchen equipment for the Shakopee Senior Multipurpose Center at
200 Levee Drive. The City Council requested assistance from'the
Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority in paying for the
installation of this equipment.
Background
At the October 7, 1980, meeting of the Shakopee HRA, members
indicated a willingness to consider the payment of the cost of
installation of the kitchen equipment acquired by the City for
the kitchen at 200 Levee Drive. The following quotes were secured:
Electrical: Greenwood Electric Co. $310.00
Conservation Systems 285.00
Redfield Electric 485.00
Plumbing: Mitsch Plumbing $ 850.00
Sand Mechanical 2095.00
In addition, modifications to the ductwork necessary to install
the canopy could cost up to $82.50. This work would be conducted
by Advance Heating Company. Due to the minor amount of this work
and the unique character of the work involved, additional quotes
were not solicited.
The equipment should be set in place the week of December 8,
1980. It would be useful for the equipment to be installed as
soon thereafter as possible.
Alternatives
The Shakopee HRA can agree to contribute to the payment of
the cost of installation, or ask the City Council to find an
alternative source. The City Council can agree to authorize the
installation of the equipment with expenditure of funds of its
own, the HRA or some alternate source. Alternately the Council
can choose not to authorize the installation of the equipment.
•
Recommendation
I recommend that the HRA authorize expenditure of $1135.00
for plumbing and electrical work necessary to install the kitchen
equipment at the Shakopee Senior Multipurpose Center at 200 Levee
Drive and authorize the payment of up to $82.50 for modifications
to the ductwork for the stove canopy.
I recommend the City Council authorize the installation of
equipment at 200 Levee Drive, with electrical work to be done by
Conservation Systems for $285.00, plumbing work to be done by
Mitsch Plumbing for $850.00 and ductwork to be done by Advance
Heating for not more than $82.50.
JA /jms
•
•
... ``` ,� „F•£ . H44 CITY �1.- 0 S H A JLlt► ® .b
•4'.4 . /. ¢ 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
• MEMO
TO:' Mayor & City Council
FROM: H.J. Ring, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: Pearson Florist - Sprinkler System
DATE: December 12, 1980
1 concur with the recommendation of the Building inspector
regarding the sprinkler system installation in the basement
of Pearson's Building.
•
As soon as the basement is used for retail or retail display,
he should be made to sprinkler the building.
HJR:plk .
. ?
Greenhouses
y' , •`: • Rural Route 1 Box 160
¢� .r p
TP carson F � ®�� ^ �� inc. V9 ' Res. Phone: 492.2113
F TD. 405 West 1st Avenue
r te^ ' ` • 4Q / S hakopee, Minnesota 55379
Cf O SO '''. i•,S 7 �' x. , _ (LP. �:' Phone: 445.4344
i
City Manager •
City Council
City of Shakopee
Re: Sprinkler System
for new building
112 Sommerville
Dear Sir:
I wish to appeal the requirement of a sprinkler system for the
basement of my new building.
Sincerely,
E ene V. Pearson
•
RECEIVED
DEC 8 1980
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
/`` .� y o f EH�A CITY O �S' �, -, H !�� K O dS .mod N 71
i' : `r IT ' li M 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
I r F i ' t
5
MEMO
TO i`
City Administrator & City Council
FROM LeRoy Houser, Bldg. Inspector
SUBJECT: Pearsons Florist Bldg. Code Requirement
DATE: December 4, 1980
The City Council is the Board of Appeals pursuant to
Section 204 of the Building Code.
Mr. Pearson has requested a meeting with the Board to appeal
the sprinkler requirement for the basement level of his
building. Included in this memo is the Code Section requiring
the basement to be sprinklered. Also a memo from Arnie Olson
Chief Plan Reviewer for the State of Minnesota who Mr. Pearson
took his first appeal to.
The Code requires sprinklers for this type occupancy in excess
of 1,500 sq.ft. or 20 sq.ft. of window opening every 50 1.f. or
one (1) 20 sq.ft. opening above grade in the exterior wall for
Fire Department access to the lower level.
Prior to this office receiving the final plans on this building
I contacted the architect and reminded him of the sprinkler
requirement. He ignored it.
i
At the time the permit was secured I placed on the permit
in the Limiting Condition Section, that the building was
required to have the lower level sprinklered so at this time
he also had this information in hand.
•
My recommendation to the Board regarding this problem is:
Considering Mr. Pearson provided a two hour (masonary dividing
wall) fire wall in the basement, two exits out of the basement,
and a 1 hour door in the basement wall, and each section of the
basement is under 1,500 sq.ft. I recommend the sprinkler
requirement be waived until the time he uses part or all of the basemei
for retail purposes or retail display purposes. Any retail use
• no matter how limited will require the immediate installation of
the sprinkler system as required by Code .
•
I further.recommend he provide us with a letter accepting this
condition.
This should be on the Council agenda for the next meeting.
A 1' .
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379
612- 445 -3650 B.P. No. l
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE NUMBERED SPACES ONLY
' t
1,PROJECTADDRESS: 'first Ave. & Sowerville //c .- YyL-,virux c
2. OWNER OF LAND: Eugene V. Pearson Rt 1, Box 251, Jordan, MN 5535
NAME ADDRESS
3. DESCRIPTION OF LAND BY: LOT. Lot 6 2 4 Parcel # 27 001/000 0 182 00
BLOCK. ADDITION: PARCEL NO:
METES AND BOUNDS: PLAT.
4. APPLICANT: Eugene V. Pearson, Rt 1, Box 251 Jordan, NN 55352
NAME ADDRESS
5. CONTRACTOR:
same as abovd
f NAME ADDRESS
6. CLASS OF WORK: 113- ADDITION ;.';-ALTERATION C]-REPAIR C 1-MOVE 0-RAZING 0-HOUSE 0-SIGN
.I-PATIO L. -PORCH L- STORAGE BLDG. L1-TANK D-DRIVEWAY 0 -FENCE D-GARAGE
7. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Retail Store
•
8. BLDG. WIDTH: 561 BLDG. LENGTH: 80' BLDG. HEIGHT: 12v
9. ESTIMATED COST OR VALUE: S ' . /2< e410.
SPACE BELOW FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
TYPE OF CONST. TOTAL SO. FEET FIRE ZONE NO. DWELLING UNITS OCCUPANCY GROUP NO. OF STORIES
1
USE ZONE DIVISION MAX. OCC. LOAD FIRE SPRINKLERS OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES
REO'O ■ YES , NO COVERED 'UNCOVERED
LIMITING CONDITIONS APPLICATION APPROVALS
0 ,,S7/74 hi /44 0_ I C; it; /o‘ 27 r-4
�v b4 a L I�r C ITY- ONING AD DATE
.-----] COMMENTS � `"
-T y � 1 t 4 / t1 + � i »y Ar
14 TY E E DAT
1-E/N9T . frOM . 74W 14 1i
_../ ,
11461-014.7?-a-- INWOr- -- r CITY BUILDI O FFICIAL DATE / Z I/
• APPLICATION FEES i
NOTES PERMIT S : C7 � �
1. SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR
ELECTRICAL. PLUMBING. MECHANICAL, SEPTIC PLAN CHECK $ / J� G?�`�
TANK, SIGNS, AND WELL INSTALLATIONS. GRADE AND SURVEY CHECK S ' ! ^ � I
2. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK PARK AND LAND S Y� `f
OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COM-
FIRE NUMBER S
MENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION IS • •
WATER CONNECTION S
SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120
DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. SEWER CONNECTION S
3. A COLORED PHOTOGRAPH MUST ACCOMPANY WELL AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM S
ALL RELOCATION PERMIT APPLICATIONS.
PENALTY OR APPEAL S
4. TWO SETS OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS MUST -
ACCOMPANY EACH PERMIT APPLICATION FOR THE STATE SURCHARGE S I /� G-y�
FOLLOWING: TOTAL Ain. � 3• (/ g� --
�
A. COMMERCIAL PROJECTS
B. INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS --v i .4 / 1-
C. RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS
SIG OF APPLICANT
(OVER) Ai
,-- / DATE
WHITE - INSPECTOR YELLO FILE PINK - APPLICANT
.
N. .'ly^I:� « ..
CITY OF SHAKOPEE a h
INCORPORATED 1870 tutr A`. : ` ',{,
,Y::u,tT.u'r° vx�t:. xx a• you�ervm ,^.. �` �
129 E. First Ave., Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445 -3650 pr.0*
September 8, 1980
v
Mr. Eugene V. Pearson
Rt. 1, Box 251
Jordan, Minnesota 55352
Re: B.P. #57.33
This letter, Mr. Pearson
is to remind you of the limiting conditions attached to
the permit you secured for your new florist shop.
There seems to be a misunderstanding regarding fire pro-
tection requirements for this building.
I was in contact with your architect prior to issuing the
permit and reminded him of the fire protection requirements
as per Sec. 3802 of the Building Code. He acknowledged the
section and indicated the building would comply with the code.
Limiting Condition #1 of your permit is for the sprinkler .
requirement. Your signature and acceptance of 'the permit is
prima facia evidence you acknowledged and accepted those
conditions.
Fire protection as required by code will be installed in the
basement of this building or a hold order for all utilities
will be issued.
The 3/4" water line stubbed into this lot is not of adequate
size to supply low hazard heads (one head per 100 sq.ft.) My
calculations indicate a minimum of a 3" line is required. I
suggest you contact your architect for an engineered design.
Your cooperation is respectfully requested.
Sincerely,
/ r
/ 1�.�
/ L-
Lefloy Houser
Building Official
LFH :plk
1' 11 L / 1 L ' Cl r / o / /) r c) r L' ti V 0// i 1/
An Equal Opportunity Employer
' . ,... . ....
:. .
-' ��,���-`
. � �
-� `..
� � �' �� ,.
. ��
[y� ' � ,�
du __'_- ___
--__�_ ____-- -- _-_--_-__- --_' _ . .~� - � ' - .
� ...
� � . .
-'--- 1 Q__ _ ' - z/
��
• ,a~-__IL'i __ _'_- __-_________________
'i J y� ,
'-
--__- �"_________.__ ____'_-_ �________ ''
.
-- -- ---- '------------------------------ --------------------
.
i k -
_- _--_ - __-- ' _`�-~°^-_~ �---'' ----'------------
/v � `�
�
• __ ' ___________'�� ___ •
_
_ � � _
v
� �
_ _-
- -_ --__'__' - -_-_--_-__-___-'-'_-'_---- '_----_-_- -- ()__ . ,.. n L, _ , -�--_---
, _„1„t.:3_....t,c,1_,,e_...,._,_ _..,___z_ . ,L4__.iefz,t2.____
u •
of,(-4- ) 4e-y - iLl a--' 3 4' .4 - 7' te-fii.2._ .4-ett.2, p--&-j ro ..t.a.„
. uu . _
-.- ---z;&3 ...e_.&,a2c,;_i....4_, .
.• ,
•Lx-et.4.4e12.0..t.' ..)
.,yr.„cL_____v d-14_22‘±c___.1.f_e_.,_„4__ A.,Q-5-1-s-UzAgr.____-4,4g__
Ao_f_5_1_aLf___ra.4.2-,P S P 5 T -4 I t-e.. ... _
/j1,2.%_&/1-Al_l__ j d r - S -2 al al- .6 4'4 ,,,r4_,, ".,
VIA-47-174-4121---‘ 6 a-GQ- 0 0 6 AE
•• -'. _ ....1_,e,,,,.__.4._,_
_______.. ____aLiTi____..fiti ....-' . - a_e.v.-zz-itz
.__.____________, 07-_e.,_ re ly, j & ./ przi ..e-d-41.2--9t-0-4
, V..,.. --71-1,,c,--t_L- -- autd-o_a2 . av :.-__!'j 1 .a.,61-1:4775
J. ..,;_a .._z___ v , ..
__:;___
, , A
�
...r-- I- . _ _
. .
. ,
;. •
4 /
a a L/G. - a "
• 0
__err
_•.-:
•
. _
•
2- 1.31 - 7/
•
•
•
-------
-----
.•
•.
•
O N � . • . _ • . .., — .1,, 1., , t ,
a ....?
il
- / 4 1 Ai" 1
1 1 A
y
•
ism i s
. . . ,
l !
JV .-.:.; • ..-.,.-r...
^�
1.11 j N 1 ^- _.- -.-- _-- __.-- - -- i,J- :".;_::,::,-.,.....1...„,....74
I •
•
''<-.- ; jr - imr�.iir�iifoP oraA it r ./ _• •
u _ j O
.,6N `� (1 r) ' . _ 411111111 1. ,„
--- - 0 . .:
Ae ..
-
0. / " I on • . .
-.- 0 . d
# 4 P i • I ,--, P .
. _
I, ), ....),_"...,,__ 0
• -I .
. . - .n-�F ` -- - _ - - - -i - - - --
-�i /A / / /..ice // /�!--
' -- I'i l -away o:
0 .- S' 0 Ard.45.
_ _ems . _____
AO i P '-' • -'-
I D 0 aze j rnAtei t ..., . ' • • :-.
0 • . _ . . ..�
1
i/ of 15.40.4...z24:41
I . P ._________ _
— b
/ ,.• „ „_,..,.., . , .--„,,, ,,./..„.,-,-„-..
----- -- .2,9(.44,0 ,_..--Aptg_ _,
__ _ __ __ . . _._ .__ __ ._.. _._ __
____ . ____
_______. _ _
::
..
______. _
•
7
1976 EDITION 3802 3801.3802 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
4
} D and shall not be obstructed in a manner that fire fighting or Chapter 38
rescue cannot be accomplished from the exterior. _. - -- .. .
( er'.:,‘ , When openings in a story are provided on only one side and the opposite FIRE EXTI N G UISH! N G SYSTEMS
\ wa of.such story is more than 75 feet from such openings, the story shall Scope k.„ be provided with an approved automatic fire - extinguishing system or t
1 - ! Sec. 3801. (a) General. Al! fire - extinguishing systems required in this
C .rJt. ` , openings as specified above shall be provided on at least two sides of the Code shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of this
., ' ,`exterior walls of the story. • — - ' ' Chapter.
1 . C; 'If.any portion of a basement or cellar is located more than 7.5 feet from All hose threads used in connection with fire - extinguishing systems shall
tt : a openings required in this Section, the basement or cellar shall bt •- provided
: :i with an approved automatic fire - extinguishing system."` ( comply with the standards of the Fire Department. (
1 2. Under the roof and eridiron, in the tie and fly galleries and in all i (b) Approvals. All fire - extinguishing systems including automatic
_.z: :
sprinklers, combination standpipes, dry and wet standpipes, special
places behind the proscenium %vall of staees, over enclosed platforms in
automatic extinguishine systems, and basement inlet pipes shall be ap-
excess of 500 square feet in area and in dressing rooms, workshops and
proved and shall be subject to such periodic tests as may be required. The
storerooms accessory to such stages or enclosed platforms. EXCEPTIONS: 1. Stages or enclosed platforms open to the auditorium location of all Fire Department connections shall be approved by the Fire
t
room on three or more sides. Department.
: 2. Altars, pulpits or similar platforms and their accessory rooms. (c) Definitions- For the purpose of this Chapter, certain terms are defin-
,, 3. Stage gridirons when side wall sprinkers with 135 °F. rated heads with ed as follows:
' heat- baffle plates are installed around the entire perimeter of the stage at CO:\1BINATION STANDPIPE is a fire line system with a constant
•:•,I points not more than 30 inches below the gridiron, nor more than 6 inches water supply and installed for the use of the Fire Department and the oc-
below the baffle plate. cupants of the building.
4. Under stage or under enclosed platform areas less than 4 feet in clear DRY STANDPIPE is a fire line system without a constant water supply
height used exclusively for chair or table storage and lined on the inside with and equipped with Fire Department inlet and outlet connections and in-
:ri •-• materials approved for one -hour fire - resistive construction.
stalled exclusively for the use of the Fire Department.
3. In any enclosed usable space below or over a stairway in Groups .A, FIRE DEPARTMENT HOST: CONNECTION is a hose connection at
i Divisions 2, 2.1, 3 and 4, E and I Occupancies. See Section 3308 (f). orade or street level for use by the Fire Department only.
• - In basements or cellars larger than 1500 square feet in floor area of ,
> >
WET STANDPIPE F is an auxiliary fire line w n w r
e with a constant at
_ ,�- Groups A and E Occupancies. -
os e
. In all Group i Occupancies except jails, prisons and reformatories; supply installed primarily for emergency fire use by the occupants of the
however, the respective increases for area and height specified in Sections :. butldtng'
506 (c) and 507 shall be permitted. (d) Standards. Fire - extinguishing systems shall comply with U.B.C.
EXCEPTION: In hospitals of Types I and 11 -F.R. construction the Standards No. 3S -1 and No. 3S -2. Combination standpipes shall comply'
automatic fire - extinguishine system may be omitted from operating rooms. with U.B.C. Standard No. 38 -3.
X -ray rooms, delivery rooms. cardiac and intensive care rooms and patient Automatic Fire •extinguishing Systems
sleeping rooms not exceeding 600 square feet in area when each such room is
r^� provided with detectors of products of combustion other than heat, comply- Sec. 3802. (a) General. Automatic fire extinguishing systems shall
t`� ing with U.B.C. Standard :No. -13 -6. �co_mply with the provisions of this Section.
6. In Group H, Divisions I and 2 Occupancies having an area of more (b) Where Required. Standard automatic fire- extinguishing systems
than 1500 square feet; in Group H, Division 3 Occupancies having an area • shall be installed and maintained in operable condition as specified in this
:.... of more than 3000 square feet; and in Group H, Division 4 Occupancies Chapter in the following locations:
";'j more than one story in height. For paint spray booths or rooms see the 1. In every story, basement or cellar of all buildings except Groups R,
{.,I Fire Code. Division 3 and M Occupancies when floor area exceeds 1500 square feet
:..: : ' :: i r In rooms where flammable or combustible liquids are stored or handled and there is not provided at least 20 square feet of opening entirely above
t # t in excess of the quantities set forth in Table No. 10 -A, or any combination the adjoining ground level in each 50 lineal feet or fraction thereof of ex -
f of flammable liquids totaling 240 gallons, as defined in the Fire Code. terior wall in the story, basement or cellar on at least one side of the
, For special provisions on hazardous chemicals and magnesium. and building. Openings shall have a minimum dimension of not less than 30
:.r t calcium carbide, see the Fire Code. inches. Such openings shall be maintained readily accessible to the Fire - I
` 535 534
- --
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Lease of Automobile
DATE: December 11, 1980
Introduction
Council authorized the seeking of quotations for the leasing of
a car for the Police Department at the December 2, 1980 Council
meeting.
Background
Solicitations were sent to Malkerson's, Shakopee Ford, and Frontier
Dodge. Only Malkerson's responded with a quotation. Our present
lease with Malkerson's expires December 31, 1980. Their proposal
is reasonable in view of last years quotations.*
Alternatives
1. Re -seek quotations from non -local dealers and defer award to
January.
2. Authorize lease with Malkerson's.
Recommendation
Authorize leasing of automobile per specifications from Malkerson's
Motors in the amount of $235.00 per month for one year.
*Under state law, quotations or bids are not required in this case.
GV /jms
MEMO T0: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, Deputy City Clerk
RE: Bingo and Gambling License Applications from V.F.W.
DATE: December 11, 1980
Background
We have received applications from the V.F.W. for both a bingo
and a gambling license for calendar year 1981.
I have checked with the Chief of Police and he has no problem
with the issuance of the licenses.
V.F.W. has conducted bingo games for a number of years in this
community without any problems.
The fees and appropriate documents required to be filed with
the City have been filed and are in order.
Recommendation
Approve the applications and grant a gambling license and a
bingo license for 1981 for V.F.W., 132 East 1st Avenue.
JSC /jms
,/MEMO TO: John Anderson
City Administrator
FROM: H. R. Spurrier
City Engineer
RE: Partial Estimate Vouchers
DATE: December 10, 1980
Attached is a copy of Partial Estimate Voucher No. 2 to
Richard Knutson, Inc., in the amount of $39,783.38 and Partial
Estimate Voucher No. 1 to Minnesota Valley Surfacing in the
amount of $59,459.62. These payments are for work completed
in East View 1st Addition.
Attached is Partial Estimate Voucher No. 2 to Minnesota Valley
Surfacing in the amount of $18,316.38. This payment is for work
completed in Weinandt Acres 1st Addition.
Recommended Action:
Approve payment of Partial Estimate Vouchers listed above.
HRS/ j iw
Attachments
. . uy
/V
. 7g.Contract No. 80 -2 Partial Estimate Voucher No. __./ }` '�i.''/ 8xlin0� 8ugnut ]I 1980
---- _-__--_--_-___--_-
�
.. �O� � on t rac t or B 1Cb� �d �nutoon, luo.
---- ---------- -----'-----
Address __ 201 Travelers Trail, Buru:vii]c, MN ����7
__���'�_���'�_����
Project Deocriptioo ---- EaSCvi�w Add .1_ [1oL/
_____ ____ '' ---'-------
1. Original Contract Amount ;;; 172,365.25
' 2. Change Order No. _ �hru No. $ _____ .
3. Total Funds Encumbered �
' -12.2_,-3l", . 25
/
h. Value of Work Completed t ] |"`)��.�U
___________'_____ ....
5. 5 Percent DetaioufT,c !!; _____ 7,328_,11.--L_ ___.
6. Previous Payments � 99 / ).(H
Y. Deductions or Charges $ -U-
______.____
8. Total q
106 8�. [`
-___�--^��.-_'___-_'
Payment Due (Line ii -'Liuc 8)
' $ 39,783.38
__
CERTIFICATE OF |Y\y
(1, We) hereby agree that the quantity and vuluc o|' work :}m,'/ herein is a fair
estimate of the work completed to date.
�
CONTRACTOR: �� �
! <|'.Y | [@.:|/ ||Y 018KOPEE PUULlC
U'/'!!.|'/'|}.: X COMM I3SION
UY: �
. ' 'N~ // '
TITLE : Zf�.�601 ,� � .`. =� ._\
_
Manage: c
APP1OVED - CITY OF -' -- / �� - //� - /��]
i __,... a / ' --
` - -- ----
)/�/i'� - - - -- -------''---
_~ �/ / .l
i i
�� ` — ' -� ' / ==-��----
V Engineer / '
.. '
'
/■ri C' ` ,-' � ^�
— ' `[ ,'
��— ---------------� ! / ' � ' �
City Administrator ). ' �
/r| / /� U
' ( -T �L�� �
' ``
, ' '
' `/\y- `
— ---'-- � �\
Finance Director ---'-----
.
'-_--.'__-_'-_-_^'__'^_--�--__--__'--^-- -
• • ' '
-_---_-.'--_
.'
1
PROPOSAL SCHEOULEal
. . /
PROJ NAME I/ • C't.". 5- ii __ 1° ?_-_-_-_ • . __'(- f__ . OWNER ... )(<". /
/
TyPE OF WORK / /1(- PROJ. NO. SHEET OF
ITEM CONTRACT ITEM UNIT UNIT C 0 N TRAC T -
NO. PR I CE QUANTITY AMOUNT
),•, / / /, •
-
, --'' „ • -`, .-',:- .
P / fr •-• *--)'' • • . •
. _
C D t3 ' . ‹.(- e --- ( 0 - :-:-':) L. ,r.. .. :-. ). 0 c. -I', c..; "-. O . ° ' / / .
L'. r . t C c cl) 1 7 c) 1 c) , . (..) c ' ' . •'_ l -.)._ ‘ `? (...,. (
CT)
L . 1: . ( k . 2 4 -; F 6 ` 0 o ' 1
t._ .F . i i L.; 0 .,,,, ' ' 38 .C2 CL • I "'•', ' ;( ..• • ‘..
• P.(i . a c
• F.
c_ .1 I ,:, . c", c., ...-"; (472.Go ,
L . F • ( (.„,. c (...) • -_.: <_. 1-2,0.e_ie, e ' . (..../ . C-'
1 • \ _ '7.-- 1 R oc le. E:1)Cc. A \-/ NT I LI NJ •
C- • N . 1 -- 7. C.-) CI ( 1 17 , ‹...) I DS .50.0c '-.'.(..,
E el. Sc"-jC.1.c.0 i A.
(.--\\ ) l•-k I-1 EK . Oq - 1 - 1- , (o d a ) L.F. L.6.- -2.A- Z :"., (...
.—' •--,
, . 4 6 V ■ C. c- : . L.F . 7 c'(i 4 ..., e ,
i U i'.:•C, E. Clo 1 f' '• ' '. • I -, (., . C" i.l- '
•._-....; e,,. _k: ; , -C( 0 E; :5 't . 1\-. ( .
E 4 . 2:7 '30 c c .;:f ;
C:1:zi_:1 - q " ' . l,l)■( C
I (). C.. - 1 .?._ % (0 SO. c...) - ''f
,...k...2.) 1 zs Q c: . e j.--..l -c.i <S ( C: '.)
E ..4 (7 ) - 0 • CC cl...7 Z._ O. Ct .....:
• .
- 2- (7 -: c) \ ee,'7 . _.c, - i ..... :: - 2.c-(- - ; ( • ..
k - 1 ) cz k ..-..).c. \I k :S C3 , ..:\ - I - ■ a L.. L
. ...., .
__-
7 c.■ 7' Al._ PA C A ec.),00 00 --/(,, s 9 .c
•
. . ,
. i
I
. .
. .
. -
,�7 s/ PROPOSAL SCHEout_E • ? t : : :y'' PROJECT NAME !� / ! c'[ti / s /rJc 7
• ?r / ..// TYPE OF WORK 6 / ' 711 `' Y —
� -- - - - -- ...—..--- __ PUOJ. NO. _ . -- -- — SHEET 2 OF _
ITEM CONTRACT ITEM - -- UNIT _ UN IT -- - '— __- __._..__..__,_ - - -_
cnN'rr,ACr
NO.
--_. - -- _— --- - - - ^ -- -- 1 R 1 CE QUA r', r 1TY AMOUNT
U / 2 n ( � /• P.
.F �. / O - / � � - c c . , , 2. (' G_,
(,-3) LCUC. � C,r G�, ✓ /- cJ is
C i /.GJC� ;,...c - c ...: /3,,) .c) - ,r _
> 6...D..-: 7� c t'/ z e. A G C, . -.7t,� <: 2 G�JCI. UG / 2 .
•t vc -
�n. C. e.)(1 /
.:/ 1. 6an (c' ( i /v c' .
1 4-•C 3 c)cs
C.. S . 96 l. .C;c, l -906
:: /4,,I. - (/« / c /S> 6)2( -
J 3/4 �v✓� L, r4 I' "• • -G � c �'
Ems. /2.6 e..) —1 z. sc4 —.oa
..` rr ,,• i ,c/, _
7 1 2 , !� /. c A ? . : >OGa.GC ' >L:CC:.0
(.6/A. T < "h7 !C / t +•a '
_ 3 C
‚ —• 7
L l.�V 1 hL (J �C < � �2 1 hC
rc'v■ -•-4 - C3 "77. 6 ( .ZS 1.1-1- C... 4 -.G
G0L. v• G: c.....1% v---, • 1 (- '51k6 (<cec'c'
Au el H
- TC - j'A hp,Q_t t') LS Z - 1 _,. 2 t, ,(jJ
1
1 I
•
.11....,: ••,_-..
, :: ::::...i. / 6- /,,, ,r , PROPOSAL SCHEDULE
. .
....
/ PROJ EC T NA ni E n; t ___./..•',--.4 __ OwN E it ________ ._..._______________._
• '` ...;'•
I
TYPE OF WORK L- /, 4 7 1 - 5 PR 0J. NO. .________ _ SHEET OF -:-%
ITEM CONTRACT IT Er.4 out T UNIT C 0 FITRAC T
_ .._
NO.
PRI Cl: QuA NT' Ty AMOUN T
_.____
(„) 2 d e 7 . 5 ( '-' -
, ,...) e..., / ck.o. 6 4: , ... < • I 47 ; ( - 2. .C:
3c) RCP CC. 7 C a •-: ,..c: 2 7. C C.. / -'f -4 .:,D(....8. C' (2 • ' . I
o .- •• ( ,. v. c ,
E . ? 7_ 0 .c..:c.. ......A- 123e, O. 6 a . / `,-_ C c .c
) (L p CL - 3 ( . C - - 2 4-C,-.., .- ' Cr, . : . .. ' 6. 7 ,; • c
„.:-...\
1 - ')
■___--, . c&1 E ei,... i c-) . y. , oc., l () C 1. 7 GO • 6 0 - . 7 --.1.-&-- -2- ;:.)
4 G 'Z. ( -
-4
-z(.2 .- l ...,1_ •--.. c.;_: . f-
8 d. t - -. itk0(c Lo I ,
t lk. - 72�. ( 0 l — I 2 0. a 0 / -- 7 2. 0
1 c c (..,- .k
.?:) 5 5 LA-) I" M 0....,J.. 0 ( c _ --- c.c.
F . E: • (..) L•0 /
..
- 1 - (/,!‘ O., L v 6. '-. ----A 6 A . 7 - 3 G. e.c.) 1 7 - 3 c) 0 i .- .? r. . (..
..._ s
1 C .-Y, \ v i I „-.7.-..-ci ,.,_
t: 6 . ( 4, 0. 0 0 1
• Tv 5 Ls
.••1 I) 1 F ( ()L..)
1..),-_-. u ; ...c_. E A. 2 ...../ L c, . '2_ 4800.00 C.;
,.._./
e I (r,....± (..... Y. c . or, ,-.) •
_ (.....) 4 L : 7 ; C. 0 . 0 C: c .-.-• ( . _ 1 .7.. c
r 7 . - ?) C) V CL, ......) i 6. - V F: C j - j . I . " '- Tot- r-S .0 o .2--So • c c i .•?. I t,.. c,' ,
--- Fc-.) - - , - A L- Pr 0---T C_ '2 --/ ) 1 t4. 0 • 2s -°
A 7 (.. .r.>3 C) • 0 "
I
(..• : 2. 4 0 . c
;
-
- r 0- A.. l..-
•
,
_, , ,
7 t
-
.
PARTIAL FST1MAT VOUCHER
Contract No. Partial Fstimate Voucher !:o. 1 ..... P Indini;:November 30, 1980
TO: Contractor Minnesota Valley Surfacing
Address Route 3, Box 120, So. Hiway 169, Shakopee, MN 55379
Project Description 1st Addition Improvements
d.
1. Original Contract Amount 81 384.00
, -0-
2. Change Order No. Thru N,.
.1
_
d.
3. Total Funds Encumbered 81 384.00
/I. Value of Work Completed , 62,589.07
5. 5 Percent Retainage $ 3 129.45
6. Previous Payments '''
.1) - 0 -
7. Deductions or Charges $ - 0 -
8. Total $ 3,129.45
Payment Due (Line 4 - Line 8) ,
59,459.62
CERTtFiCATk uF PAYi
(1:, We) hereby Agrec that Lilo qual,LiLy and wom: fd 'd ::1: .111 hQmin j:: a f:Lir
estimate of the work completed to date.
r
CONTRACTOR: eh A
BY: _17-2
TITLE: / , . .
DATE: /2/9/C-0 -
1) 'El) CITY OF SJJAKOPEF
Li c
... \ Iwar.
1
v....-
City Engii. er /10-0
Datc
City Administrator . Date
Finance Director Date
c .
PROPOSAL SCHEDULE
PROJECT NAME Eastview 1st Addition ImprovementsowNER William Chard
TYPE OF WORK Roadway improvements PROJ. NO. 80-2 SHEET OF _.
ITEM CONTRACT ITEM UNIT UNIT CONTRACT
__.___._____
Na PRICE QUANTaY AMOUNT
• 1 Concrete Curb & Gutter
Design B-618 L.F. $ 4.75 4580 $21,755.00
2 Concrete Valley Gutter
-
8' Pan L.F. 22.00 94 2,068.00
3 5" Class 5, 100% Crushed Tons 5.90 2992.3 17,654.57
4 2" MnDOT 2341 Bituminous Wear Tons 20.00 961.5 19,230.00
5 Black Dirt C.Y. --
6 Seed, Mulch & Fertilizer A.C. --
Extra Work
Alley Grading L.S. '881.50 1 1,881.50
TOTAL $62,589.07
•
. -
T3/
. _
PARTIAL ESTIMATE VOUCHER
Contract No. 80 -9 Partial Estimate Voucher No. 2 _ Period Ending: November 30, 1980
TO: Contractor Minnesota•Valley Surfacing
Address Route 3, Box 120, So. Highway 169 Shakopee, MN 55379 -
Project Description Weinandt Acres 1st Addition - Street Construction
1. Original Contract Amount $ _ 47,207.35
2. Change Order No. Thru No. $ - 0 -
3. Total Funds Encumbered $
4. Value of Work Completed $ 49,278.50
5. 5 Percent Retainage $ 2,463.91
6. Previous Payments $ 28,498.20
7. Deductions or Charges $ - 0 -
8. Total $ 30,962,12
Payment Due (Line 4 - Line 8) $ 18,316.38
CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT
(1, We) hereby agree that the quantity and value of work shown herein is a fair
estimate of the work completed to date. //
CONTRACTOR: 1,/� `�efvr ci � /�i /Z
BY: . C17 Lri: °s
TITLE: /Z / /�
APPROVED - CITY OF SHAKOPEE
• 11 --war 77/6(EZ)
Citygineer
City Administrator
Finance Director
7
PROPOSAL SCHEDULE
PROJECT NAME Weinandt Acres 1st Addition OWNER H.L. Weinandt
TYPE OF WORK Roadway Construction PROJ.NO. 80 - 9 SHEET 1 OF 1
ITEM CONTRACT ITEM UNIT UNIT CONTRACT
NO. PRICE QUANTITY AMOUNT ^~
2101..
507 Grubbing Ea. $ 5.00 4 $ 20.00 0 $ 0
2104.
501 Remove Pipe Culvert L.F. 3.50 20 70.00 0 0
2105.
501 Common Excavation C.Y. 1.06 9985 10,584.10 14185 15,036.10
2211.
501 Aggregate Base Class 5 Ton 3.50 3432 12,012.00 5609.3 19,632.55
2331.
514 Binder Course Ton 17.50 196 3,430.00 0 0
2341.
508 Wear Course Ton 17.75 991 17,590.25 709.4 12,591.85
2221. •
501 Aggregate Shouldering Class 1 Ton 5.00 337 1,685.00 0 0
2501.
505 24" R. C. Pipe Aprongs Ea. 180.00 2 360.00 1 180.00
2503.
511 24" R.C. Pipe Sewer, 0' - 8' L.F. 28.00 52 1,456.00 52 1,456.00
STREET TOTAL '48,579.75 •
Extra Work - Test Strip L.S. 382.00 1 382.00
TOTAL $49,278.50
•
•
it
7 ,)
C
MEMO Ti'O: John Anderson
City Administrator
FROM: R. Spurrier
City Engineer
RE: Kmart On -site improvements
K Mart Fence
DATE: December .L2, 1930
Attached is Partial Estimate Voucher No. 2. Thio voucher hit::;
been approved by K Mart Corporation and M. A. Moj:•Len;;on Company.
The contractor, Crowley Fence Company, inc., has agreed that the
quantity and the value of the work shown on the estimate is a fair
estimate of the work completed. Also attached to the estimate is
correspondence from M. A. Mor ten:=,on rega.r(i i Hf, the adjustment that
will be made in the contract price.
This estimate has been approved in accordance with the requirements
of the redevelopment agreement with K Mart and should be paid.
Recommended Action:
Authorization of Partial Estimate Voucher No. 2 to Crowley Fence
Company in the amount of $23,783.00.
• FIR S / j iw
Attachments
•
..- .
\--
..-. :.,.•.,..)4:-,, • • ti:: \ )
;.Alvi.!.\1, 1.,.• i .,..... . .r,f.m.:- ,.. , , ..,,. i .0 ).--__
,
,
. ,,
2 \- ,, _ ,, ' 28, 1980
ConLract No. Ptirt..i :! I •'• L I :::•:.1.• • '..` li, • : : • :• . ! ..;• . \•;,-..:::: : , h ...,:. ... ...- .....____
,...4-, ,..
- / 744 - -,---. \ ' '
-4. f i 1 ...../
TO: Contractor Crowley Fence Company, Inc.
_
_
Address 10600 Nassau Street Northeast, Mpls., MN 55434
__.
s..
Project Description K mart Fence
J. Original Contract A:1:06W.
. 6
.. ..
" .
''' OrOor Po
_-.-.- lr ;:“ , .
____ . _ :. .. . . . .
----- - - - ---------------------
:i . ToLal Vund:.: Eheumi.wrvd .
a , 8:35 . 00
--- -• ------ ---------
1 4. Value of Work Completo ,. 56,035.00
i. 5 Percent ReLain:r;y :'- 2,802.00
,
6. Prt.:viouL; Pnymentc, 29,h50.00
__
7. Deductions or Charges $
_ . . . . . . _ . -0-
8. Total q
Y___32.,252..0.0______ .
Tnvment Due (line 4 - Lino 8)
),' 2 3.a 8 . 3 : 0 P_________
c!..!:'H 1•11'•,'I ,.: ,, r' ':', .;! '::
I s , w,.) ho ;1 ., h: ;_. i,ii,_ , in:n.; Hy ; v.:. I n. , • ... . ,- :.I;. ...:. i.t.:•• i i, ; :: ::, f'::..i r
osLimate o.!' the , ....ork compieLed Lo daLe.
APPROVED:
CONTRACTOR: Crowley Fence Co., Inc.
.
K KART CORPORATION
;!,, •
. _ ili . • •
,
1)ATE: TiLle
APPki)V! - - TY OE S.IIAKor
411
..... c
--- 7 -
Dflte
/ (I 101(60
i. Eng.,,,,,,..,,, DNLI. M. A . 'liziu.,1-'
•
6
- . ./.(//, 4 ,
cit Administrator 1.)ate O0/ ar. f ...
•
Title
__
F .1 na:R.: o D j n21.. t, ('l r 1)::Lo DaLe
. -
M. A. iv1ORTENSON COMM NY
GENERAL. CONTBACTOI1S 700 .:":Dc) 1. '! ri( 1 .
1�1:`�I11 C ADDRESS PO 13();, . !l) • , !; i'( 1I !' ;!i .... • . • r;
December 4, 1980 � � _ .__.....� A
•
•
Crowley Fence Company
10600 Nassau Street iJi'•;
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55433
Attention: Mr. Michael Allen
Re: Kmart Distribution Center.
Shakopee, Minnesota
Fencing Contract
Gentlemen:
Confirming my telephone conversation of December 2, 1980, we
believe that the Owner is entitled to reduce your contract
by $8,800. This deduct is arrived at in two parts, the first
part is the credit for the non - specified fabric and the second
part is a credit for work which was included in your bid, but
not installed.
Galvanized. Fence Fabric
The differential cost: between class ]: and class 11 galvanizing
is at least 604 per lineal foot. This cost extended by the
8,700 lineal feet involved, amounts to $5,220., h 4% sales tax
credit of $209 should be applied to this amount, plus a 10%
markup for profit and overhead of $543, Lo give a subtotal of
$5,972. •
Deletion of LP Storage Fencci ny_
To delete 430 lineal feet of fence at rl contract deduct: price
of $G per lineal foot gives n total of ;::',51 0. Also, delete,
•a 12 foot gate at $178 and ,l 3 foot g,ll.e at $70 [o,r a subtotal
of $2,828.
As :C indicated in our telephone conversation, ]: have contacted
the City of Shakopee and requested tllat they prepare a payment
Page Two c�
December 4, 1980'
Crowley Fence Company
for you based on reducing their existing contract of $64,835
by the $8,800 described above. Please contact me if you have
any comments or questions on any of this.
Very truly yours,
7;/
Day.icl G. Turney /
D G `1' : l o /
r
cc: Kmar L Corporation
(..Ch ty of Shakopee
Owner's Representatitie
MAM Jobsito
•
,•:::, . M
.�'- : �7 �, ? • VA . a 'Am/ 4). F ' g *Yt., i9' 0 I
' _ --
M A. \ [;NSOF\i ( Ci M?'.;,;•I,.,, `; • ;. !:
(.iI NI RAI. CUN I h;l("k •'I `, , c ,'. r, i
MAILING i'•I)DF; S5 I'c) ,■ ):..., : IN c..1c ' 1 . . . • „ I .
December 4, 1980 .
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Attention: Mr. [3o Spurrier
Re: Kmart Distribution Center
Shakopee, Minnesota
Fencing Contract
Gentlemen:
We are writing pursuant to the contract of Crowley Fence Company,
Inc. to install the perimeter fence at the above referenced
Jobsite. We request that you release payment to the contractor,
based on the following computation:
Original Contract Amount 64,835.
Work Completed & Stored to date $ 56,035.
Less 5%v Retai nage 2,802.
$ 53,233.
Less Previous Payments 29,450.
Total Payment Due $ 2.3,783.
•
By copy of this letter, we are forwarding the "partial estimate
voucher" transmitted to us with your .letLcr elated November 28,
1980. Please contact me if you have any comments or questions
on this.
Very truly yours,
ZE) ---(7 .„----- ---, .
David G. urney
/) '
DGT:lo
/
Enclosure f
' c : MAM Jobsite File . 1 E' p �' Kmart Corporation • •
;.4 Owner's Representative
•
90
MEMO T0: John Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Park Reserve Fund Budget
DATE: December 10, 1980
Attached is the proposed 1981 and revised 1980 Park Reserve Fund
Budget.
Revenue for 1980 and 1981 is from park dedication fees and interest
income. We are now planning on no expenditures for 1980. For 1981,
six hundred dollars is budgeted for playground equipment pursuant
to a 1978 donation as is $1,000.00 for improvements to the boat
landing. Of the remaining funds which are from the dedication fee,
Council previously passed a motion that 90% of fees go to land ac-
quisition. Recently, Council has indicated interest in changing
the percentage to 65 %. On that basis, $33,000 has been budgeted
for land acquisition and $18,000 for development.
If Council desires to follow that direction, a motion would be in
order to change the park dedication fee restriction for land acquisi-
tion from 90% to 65 %.
Also, if there are no changes to the proposed budget developing
out of discussion on the budget, a motion to adopt the revised
1980 and the 1981 Park Reserve Fund Budget would be in order.
GV /jms
attachment
7Q
DEPARTMENT DIVISION FUND
Park Reserve
PERSONAL SERVICES AND CAPITAL OUTLAY EXPENDITURES
NUMBER OF 1980BUDGET 1981BUDGET
OBJECT EMPLOYEES
19 19
Adopted Proposed ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
Fund Balance January 1 $ 1,939 $ 1,939 $37,839
Revenue:
Park Dedication 15,000 35,000 15,000
Grants (O'Dowd) 97,500 -- --
Contributions 1,000 -- --
Interest -- 900 1,500
Total Revenue 104,435 35,900 16,500
Expenditures:
Playground Equipment 1,000 -- 600
Boat Landing -- -- 1,000
Land - O'Dowd 130,000 -- --
i Land JEJ -- -- 33,000
Landscaping - Lions 1,000 -- --
Redevelopment = Earth work - JEJ -- -- 18,000
132,000 -- 52,600
Fund Balance December 31 $ 15,626 $37,839 $ 1,739
•
(2 4 7 / 1 \_,
.MEMO TO: John Anderson
City Administrator
FROM: H. R. Spurrier
City Engineer
RE: Ordinance Amending Chapter 3.21, Shakopee City Code -
West Side Sewer Flow Allocation
DATE: December 11, 1980
The procedure for transferring flow allocations should be
altered so that transfers of flow allocation must be approved.
Under the present system, property owners could sell all of the
allocations and leave the land void of allocation. The amendment
provides that in addition to filing a signed copy of the agree-
ment between property owners, that the agreements transferring
flow allocation, must also be approved by the City Engineer.
With this review by the City, the City is assured that the land
in the controlled area will always have sufficient allocation
for proper development.
A copy of Ordinance No. 28, is attached. The difference between
proposed Ordinance No. 49 and Ordinance No. 28 may be noted.
Recommended Action:
Pass Ordinance No. 49 which requires the approval of any flow
allocation transfer.
HRS /jiw
Attachments
ORDINANCE NO. 28
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHIAPTER 3.21 OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY CODE L �
Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of
Shakopee as follows:
Section 1 - Section 3.21 of the Shakopee City Code,
formally Ordinance number 386, filed as abstract document number
154681 in the Office of the Scott County Recorder and as torrens
document number 15991 in the office of. the Scott County Registrar
of Titles, is hereby amended to provide a new Subdivision 6
as follows:
Subd. 6. Records. The flow allocations as herein before
set forth are subject to transfer by and between the
affected parcels and are further subject to creating
specific designated flow allocations within each
individual parcel. No such transfer or specific
designation'of said flow allocation shall be effective
and recognized by the City unless and until an agreement
is entered into by and between parties affected thereby,
and a signed copy of which agreement is filed with the
office of the City Engineer for the City. The records
kept by the City Engineer shall be deemed conclusive
and final with respect to said flow allocations and
all building permits issued within the controlled
area shall be issued in accordance with flow allocation
records in the office of the City: Engineer. .
Section 2 - This ordinance shall take effect upon its
passage and publication.
Adopted in adj.r.eg.session of the Shakopee City Council
on the 17th day of July, 1979.
Walter C.'Harbeck, Mayor
/ , J
Attested to By: = yr� L 3 72C_e
Douglas Rudder, City Administrator
Published in l.hc Shakopee Vn L I.ey News : 8/29/79
Prepared and approved as to form by: KRASS, MANAHAN, MEYER & KANNING
Assistant City Attorneys
1221 Fourth Avenue East
Shakopee, MN 55379
vf�a * ',ii,- :.r'i.sc fir, y�q, ... . %�. »; iY:' T ,y.�i'w .rA. �a� �. mo '^�i +•.. 1" x k '-.'r f,� l .:nci ire,i % �i.:. IaS. cC�'t8t` -'ti .
nq. {
d �. n ..7 _
' V
ORDINANCE NO. 119
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3.21 OF THE :SHAKOP1 ;Is; CITY CODE
Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, as follows:
Section 1 -- Section 3.21 of the :;liukopcc City Code, Formally
Ordinance No. 386, filed as abstract document No. 15 in the office
of the Scott County Recorder and as to:I1('1 :s document No. 15991. in
the office of the Scott Count ;y Registrar uf' 'i'it.Lcs, is hereby amended
to provide a new Subdivision as follows:
Subd . 6. Records. The flow allocation as herein before
set forth are subject to trans, er by and between the
affected parcels and are further subject to creating
specific designated flow allocations within each
individual parcel. No such transfer or specific
designation of said flow allocation shall be effective
and recognized by the City unless and until an agreement
is entered into by and between parties affected thereby,
and a signed copy of which agreement is filed with and
approved by the City Engineer For the City. The records
kept .by the C :i.ty ] rngii.neer s ha:l l hr rleemed conclusive
and final with respect; to said J.'.Low allocations and
all building permits issued within the controlled
area shall be issued in accordance with flow allocation
records in the office of the City Engineer.
Section 2 - This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage
and publication.
Section 3 - Ordinance No. 28, tIth Series is hereby repealed
in its entirety effective upon passage and publication of this
ordinance.
Adopted in — _ — - - - - -- session of the Shakopee
City Council on the day of ----- __ -._- 19
Wait G. l I <a r to e c l; , Mayor
Attested to By:
John 1lnderson, City Admin:i.,;tra1 r
Prepared and approved as to form by: KR'\S , MEYER & KANNING
Assistant City Attorneys;
122 :L East Fourth Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Published in the Shakopee Valley News:
{ t
I 1580 CT TY OF S'tAKOnEF CHECK REGISTER 12-10-80 PACE i
I '' CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOi ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.C. 8 MESSA3E
I ..__._ - ---... -- • - --•- ----- -- -......_.- {.'
i• 3450:14 12/13/9; 1 ^2.07 ADAMS PEST CONTROL OTHER PROF SERVICES 01- 4315 - 361 -36 07696
102.01 • r•'
***fill _...... _. .. - - -- .. •a -CKS -.. .
I :: n 345108 12/10/16 172•75 AIR COMM ECUIP.MAINT.& REP. 01- 4230- 312 -31 1` �
• 345708 12/10/10 15.00 ATR COMM COMH•SYSTEM MAINT, 01- 4233-321-32 07
197.75 •
•.. -CKS --- --- I,-
lirtl ,
•' 345) 19 12/13 /11 15.00 ALPHA TOOL PRODUCTS VEH MAINTRREP 91- 4232- 421 -42 4021
15.00 •
LI
, •
•• f
( 343717 12/13/9' 124.80 ANDERSON ELECTRIC GENERAL SUPPLIES 01- 4220 - 121 -12 13564
129. ?0
s _..I
•.•. •. l
... -cKS („
345224 12/13/ 65.80 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT PATCHING HAT .1- 4241 - 427 -42 1254
65.80 •
•.••.. _ -._ •■•-
CKS
149026 12/10/11 6.64 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPL GENERAL 91- 4220 - 411 -41
Y NERAL SUPPL.[E ---- -... - - -- - 220 ---.. - . _. - _ ... - . 1,,.- " 345725 12 /10 /l^ 15. Q5 AUTO CFN7R4L SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPL I'S 01-4220-42 •
' 345926 12/13/10 • 60.43 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLTES 01- 4220-441 -44
345) 26 12/10/11 20.00 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 01- 4220 - 621 -62 :.
22ER- -- -- 01- - - - - --
345126 12/13/90 2 6.30 AUTO C SUPPLY SHALL TOOL POWER 4225 - 441 -44 .
. ! ' 145)26 12/10/80 51.5? AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY EOU[P MAINTRREP 01- 4230 - 141-44 I'`
.345026 12/11/40 3.87 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY EQUIP MAINTRREP 01- 4230- 421 -42
• - - -. - - -- ENtR - -- -
i ,•,
345P26 12/1?/4'? 72.48 AUTO CENTRAL 4UPPLT EQUIP HAINTRREP' )1 =4 ?3Q= 941 =44
345026 12/10/91 4.33 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY =QUIP MAINTRREP 01 -4230- 621-62 1 '
{ ; 345026 12/11/40 457.01 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY VEH MAINTRREP 01 -4232- 312 -31' •■
A ,
8.90 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLT - VEH MAINT�tiEP� � •
345026 12/11/9)
_1- 4 - 3 -32 -
345926 12/17/49 148.'9 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY VEH MAINTRREP 01- 4232 - 421-42 .�
'
' 345026 12/10/1°? 20.60 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY VE-I MAINTRREP 01- 4232-621-62
•
' 345227 12/12/90 30.07 JEANNE ANDRE TRAVEL EXPENSE 22- 4330 - 196 -19 ! <„
222 -
345027 12/13/1? 15.13 JEANNE ANORE TRAVEL EX - 24- 2 4330 - 19 2 -17
44.90
{ , • •. • ;.
••• -CK
• 14502' 12/1:/11 433.F0 EARL F. ANDERSON STSNSSSTRIPIVG MAT 01- 4250 - 421 -42
431..1,
•
i . . 114 .. •
• •• - CKS {.,
3 12/1l/;t:' 35.73 '•ARY A. ARLT OTHER PROF SERVICES 31 -4315- 171 -17 c ' I
35. '5 • I• •
• 345035 12/11 /' 0 70.42 ASSOC.MEC't. FIUT LOTN; MAINT. 11- 4231 - 101 -18 3579
4
1 C CT TY OF SHAKOPE= CHECK REGISTER 12-10-90 P A :E 2 I
I ,
• 1; CH€-C ND. - DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. I P.O. B MESSAGE '
79.60 • -° '
l a .
l'! 345036 12/11/90 201.7? JOHN K. ANDERSEN TRAVEL EXPENSE 01 -4330- 121 -12
I'l
•! 200.01 •
10
9; • •f• • r ••f- K II
�•• 345052 12/1)/90 62. BATTERY NFISE.TNC. EOUTP MATMT°REP 01-4230- 411-41
345'052 12/1J/' 0 29.77 BATTERY VHSE.INC. EOUTP MAINT&REP 01-4230 - 441 -44 '"
' 92.44 •
•' 345(253 12/10/94 10.21 •.•_. RFRFNS GENERAL SUPPLIES • 01 -4220- 182 -18
. 10. •
- • •••••
i - -- _ ►•r fr . , 1
3A 5060 12/19 /BO 512.2 ._. BRYAN .-._..._—.----._._.__—._- --- •-- •- _--- -- ...- .---- -- -_.__- - -- •-- ---- °- .---- _- __.,_._._ ._ _._.._..
' - AGGREGATES ROAD MTLS• 01-4240-427-42 •
.._...._.612.20 • • t...
it -
345061 12/13/90 297.89 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS GROUNDS MAINT.MTLS. 01- 4243 - 625 -62 If
_297.8° •
LI
..
■ • • • R
. _ _.__._.- - _ .... ...... ______ _ ... ..._- _____-.__-- ..____ _ _ _ __ __ ______ ._.._ ..... . _._...._.__.- ._._.___..-_______ -. -. _
i 345767 12/17/90 11161.27 ROY N• RAKER OTHER PROF SERVICES 0 1 -4315- 331 -33
1,161.20 •
. 3450 69 12/19%i - -- . . - .. 157.J5 -- . — TOM [iROWNELI - . _ ------- • •TRAVEL E EW§t . -- . _ . ___ . 01- 4330 - 311 -31 - •
•• 157.0) •
r•
1
3 ^ .8 4 12/17/80 2.899.92 CARG ILL INC. ICE CONTROL MILS. 91 -4244- 432 -42 P
2.889.82 • _ -
■
••• - C J
K
' " 345087 12 /10 /99 107.91 CDP INC. nFC. EQUIP. RENTAL 1 1 -4383- 121 -12 92639
' 107.9:1 • - .._... _.._._ __.. . ..._ _..... .
• .••.. 11
•••
• j 345095 12/17/9 72.15 CLAYS PR TNT ING GENERAL SUPPLI_S 41 - 4 125 -13
•i 345095 12/1) /9 7 754.76 CLAYS PRINT TN G ^GENERAL SUPPLIES 31- 4220-151 -15
345095 12/10/99 305.25 CLAYS PRINT INS PRTG. R REPRO. 01 -4351- 311 -31
1 1 11 32. 1; •
-,' ••••••
1 .. •••-CK$ .-
`' 345106 12/13/93 1.469.17 JULIUS A. COLLER II LEGAL SERVICES 31 -4310- 161 -15 ∎ -,
1,469.1
• ••• • • ••• -CKS
_ I
345130 12/1'-/99 2.12 DU'1NINGS H1DWE. GENERAL SUPPLIES 11- 4220-121 -12
I . 1.8'1 CITY nF SHAKOPEE CHECK REGISTER .12 -10 -91 PAGE 3 /
I' CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.0. U MESSA.= `
I;;
345130 12/17/50 1.53 DUNNINGS HOWE. GENERAL SUPPLIES C1 -4220- 141 -14 I
I i 3 451 30 12/11 /50 10.01 DUNNINGS HDWE. GENERAL SUPPL TES 01- 4220 - 182 -18 1"
I'•; 345130 12/10 5.7 DUNNINGS HONE. GENERAL SUPPLIES 11 -4220- 311 -31
I ■ 345130 12%17/9 - 5.84 DUNNINGS HOWE. - GENERAL SUPPLT_S - - 11- 4220 - 321-32 '•
345130 12/11/80 2.70 DUNNINGS HOWE. GENERAL SUPPLIES 01- 4220 - 411 -41 I'
345130 12/ . 25.33 DUNNINGS HON GENERAL SUPPLIES 01 -4220- 421 -42 1
I /1750 E. • 345130 12/17/57 3.79 DUNNINGS HOWE. GENERAL SUPPLIES 01- 4220 - 441 •44
345130 12/10/50 16.65 DUNNINGS HOWE. GENERAL SUPPLIES 01- 4220 - 521 -62 I "!
0 .
(',, 3 451 30 12/11/80 18.44 DUNNINGS HOWE. SM. TOOL PURCHASE 01-4225-521 -62 i I„
'' 3451 1 7.92 OUNNI■ HOWE. GENERAL S UPPLIES 56- 4220 - 403 -41 7
I' • 103.9G •
f• i -,
, • • •. • •. - i.i -Ck. 2.
1• 1 - ' 345147 12/11/52 _ 27.10 EASTMAN DRUG _ GENERAL SUPPLI =S _ 01-4220-311-31
HI i` 345147 12/1'1 ?0 2T: 10- EAST PAN ORl7G - Q TAEit PRNF:S °RVTCE ^1 =c3i5 iii =31
• 345147 12/10/50 27.13 EASTMAN DRUG OTHER PROF.SERV ICE 01 -4315- 311-31 _ ,
27. 10 •
•
•••••r • • •- CKS I i
' 3 4 51 5 1%17%3 _ -- 11.93- •_.... .. 'ELVLN S A F ETY SUPPLI - - - - -- . _EOJ•1P. HA1fIT. - - - -- - - - - - -- ^1= 4230-32I =;32 B0253
10 • 93 • ! a
i.,. - -1
r_KS I;
345170 12/10/91 16.490.00 FIRST NAT. ST. PAUL CASH DEP. 33- 1050 - 300 -31 r., 345170 9 12/13/5 55.03 FIRST NAT. ST. PAUL PAYING AGENT 33- 4612 - 911-91
i 16.539.00 • •
•.. ■CKS
I
I 345173 12/13/89 25.27 EAOL FLECK TRAVEL EXPENSE '1- 4330 - 314 -31
I S 25.20 •
, ., • . •►. • - _ ... • .. -CKS ....,
I•
i '' 1 345176 12/10 /81 24.91 FRANZ ENGR• REPROD. PRTG. & REPRO. 01- 4351- 411 -41 3797
1 ^ 24 . 9� • .. -- - -- - . . . . ......... . _. .. . ... . -
I , ' . .•••. •• • - CKS
3 12/13/59 29.0 R 0 G H SANITATION RARBA /U GE P 31 -437
I 151 -1R "'
i 345181 12/10/50 25.00 G P. H SANTTATION GARBAGE °/U 71 -4373- 311 -31 1'1
345141 12/13/50 25.00 G 3 P SANITATION GARBAGE P/U 01-4373-321-32 i
{', 345181 12/10/5'1 . 25.00 G C H SANITATION GARBAGE P/U . 91 - 4373 - 421 -42 _
345181 12/11/50 2 G & H SANITATION GARBAGE P/U 01 -4373- 621 -f•2 '^I
i • 345151 12/10/90 144.03 G 1, H SANITATION GARBAGE P/U 01- 4373 - 525 -t,2
1' 345181 1.2/1•)/50 51147.7 G 7. H SANITATION GARBAGE P/U 11- 4373 - 111 -71 j'1
A•40 • ,
1 •••••. •••-(.KS ;
» 345155 12/iJ/5^ 1.11 GOPHER STATE TRUCK EOU TP. MAINT. )1- 4230 - 312-31 55340 1 .
1.1'' •
'
. '
. •
' � ' - ' - - --'� —� -------------------�---''--'-------'----------'------------------ '�--------'' ----'-------'----
` •
( 1 Sou crry or xxxKoPcE . ____ _ _ �xco�����ISrEn �x-�p-�o PAGE �
'|
' cvcc' wn. "RATE AMOUNT ncwnnn ITcw DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. w r.o. x MESSAGE: '
_ �_______'__'________ ______ __ �___________ _________________� __ ' _ ___
^
' ^^"°^^ ^^^-cxv
.
'| j^nao^ - i6ii�,�6 ' --- - - ' --- ��: - 3 -------- ��l�f�� - ���t����� ------ ��/th�� - §���CI�� ---- ' -- 1����i��� 6izi- ---�-----'-� -'-''---
' `i 345204 12/10 /30 13.46 HARROWS mowc• HANK on.rouL puncyxnc 01-*225-621-62
'� ' ' ' '____-�__'__--._'_'__--'___'_---_''__---_'____________________________ ______ __ _ _ |�
a���� �
� |"
' '1 3992 ,)9 12/13 /10 449.64 LcnnY HOUSER SCHOOIS u cowr• 11-4390-331-31 [
• '''
*^p.o*
�' - ---_.--- -'_-_-_'- .
/`
'' " "°^^^ . ^^^-cxx . ��
^. 3452 27 �c/� n��v 201.00 HARRIS MACHINERY '---'-- �fA[EQUIP • �
-------- 1-451I-44i-44 001727
_ |'!
- oo1.on •
l
� - - '- - --------' -- --'--'----'----'-----------------------'---'--------------- ----- '- - '- ' r
' ° "^°,. ^^.-��� --
.. 3*521" 12/10(90 . '-9 _--.xA?nE��nynp*Y'EuUI�. .---cAPxTAL_cm!z�._________0 _ �
�z oo • `
^ '
' °^ i -
° • ^^^ -rx� ,-
�
' 345211 12x11 /8 0 21.90 ncnmrws oxcLcr VEHICLE n« TNT . 01-4232-312-31
| .
��^so • ' — --- '---- ------'--'--'-------------- ! •
• .„
- ^ ^^^^^ ^ ^^'c�n
i '
'^ 145215 12/11 /10 ---19.cl5 - ---- � HOUSE OFPR INT � --- ' --- GENERAL DUP;L - TES ------- G1-4220-1 21-12
'' 345215 1211)19 0 . 32.35 HOUSE OF PRINT GENERAL SUPPL 01-*220-125-12 ..
- 345215 12/1)/01 _�z��.��-� --. HOUSE OF PR '�-� __����n«��y���ccP •
__- _���*��y����-�� •
' n��c�n �x/o/"o fit. *nmoc or pn/wr pnrs u xcpox --� o�-�u�z '' •
| ^ ^ '
- ozv.as • .
.
^^^^^ - •^^
- ` ' --'-'--- - ----------- -------''- -----'-------'------' - -- -- >
^ - --' - � -t� ,
..
3452 35 1 u/ 1 omn .. _�po.�� _ � _ zos_�z�c_�ws, _ _ _ .�cnzr-nsr.co�p, __.__ ....RI-4927-911-91 _ _
100. 3 • '
1"
^^^ ^^^-ms '
_ _- .. _-__--_'___ .. - ._ ' -
' 345238 /u/zo^`n ozu.ro ' rwsr^nr rssr/ws cxmn. ocnvrcc 11-4312-411-41 .�
345238 12/11/80 1 .t^o,�n •• Iwsrmvr TESTING cmon. SERVICE _ � 56-4312-403-*1
1, r /p.m • . ,.
.e
,-• ^ ^"^ ^ ^ ^^^-c"� �
_ �
•
`
' 345294 12/1) /19 14 •514 GEORGE JOHNSON JR. TRAVEL EXPENSE 91-4331-141-14
14.94 • -
`' ^"^^ ^^^-cnn -
`~ �'
�
� 3^.5 12/ijn1 - �j t iw ic - ..kmt ' rxiivcL cxnci■ssE •ti-4 '335-i2i-i2
i
� '
° �| 345275 z �`ms m.�^ rrw xsxwc rnwx�� EXPENSE ��-��m-�z�-�' �
' s^nxrn 12/1 1vvz' 9.3 • • rro xcuvE TRA VEL EXPENSE 11-4331-171-17 '
41.351 ^
, .
•
'-_______ -`
1980 cIr'nrS*xYo?�� CHECK REGISTER . 12-10-81 PAGE 5
i .:.1 cxccx wn, oxrc AMOUNT VENDOR rrcm DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT O. INV. n P.O. , MESSAGE '
'! . ''
1 , 1 ^^"^^^ ^^^-cxo
• |. ` . �
|'| j �
^n zv� i5�id�0 888•73 7 �
-'--'� �--[��-------'---------- �
���7p�V��?� 51-15 F
^i 888. ° ,1
. .,
, 4/1101!°* ***-CKS .,
i "! '"
'i o^nopp 1o�n/no 7.50 LONE STAR Lzrc REMIT-CANCER n1-*pxa-ao-p1 /
�� ' ---� -' --' ----7.50 * ''-------�'----'---------------------'---- --'------'---'---- '-- ''�
.. 1:«71 '/ ^ ^"^^^
|' ^^^ - - ----------'-------' — ------'------------- ------------------- ' - � - Z ''
' 11 o^n3m m,mmn 270 .4; n«�ncxonm MOTORS VEHICLE MA o� +zxz-o�u �� [
^ ^ - -
'. 345311 12/11r81 2.39 MAcxcxSnw MOTORS VEHICLE wxImr. 01-4232-421-42
' } .�
- - --2Y2.84• � — -----�'--------------- ----------' � -------
| '
' ^°^^"" ^^^-cxs .
/ __'.'-'-___' - -- - •
- . ' - - '-____-___.' .. .'_- -__-'__' . - /
! �
' 12/13/90 �J
• 345326 //'v 74.00 MIDWEST HVC comzp. nx/wr. n�-+oao-*
-^* 17077 |,.
^
r^.no
_ .. ' . - . --__---- ___----'--__-____ -_---_. _ _ . _ . . _ _ . ____ ___ ___ ___ ..... -' _ _-_ ' '
/ . ^^^^^ � ^••■C"u `
!
345333 12/10/91 ---- �45 • 31 - LARRY MAkTIN - --- - TRiVE[-El-65E45r-------iil:430zi7lii4 - '
, ^ 345331 zu/o/xv 31.97 LARRY MARTIN SCHOOLS n CONF. 01-4391-141-14
.. : r/.z" ^
- -- --�--'�' --''-- --�-----�-----'-----' -------'-------'-------�-------- ----- -' -'- - � ' °
` ^ ^1^^ ^ ^^^-cxo |.,-
. i45n i12/10/1" 149�54 MINN.HENEFT T ASSN. REMIT-CANCER �[�������il-�l �
�
r '
| j 149.54 ^
,| |^
-
~^^^^~ ' - -'- - - ' -- - --�---------- - --- -- ' - '------�---- ' �� °^.-CRt • "
....
3 45334 12/10 /90 34• ��.n5 xzwn,oALLc, ELEC. ELECTRIC nrwr. 31-4370-181-18 _ •
345334 1u/iowo ,p� RIw�,ViLicr cLcc. tLFcfxit - i . 1-1t. oi-«3f�-Si-�� ' • - -
rr.pt ° _.
�`
,^,°,� • � _ _ __ _ _ ___� _�____�_ . ____ . __ _ _ s;-tkt .'
| -
� ^s�o �u/o/»n _ _u�.c� __ GAS STMT. 01-4371-181-18
il 31533T 12/1'J /8r: za.xz 4iw�cAnc� ��n ����, - 01.‘-'4.371 -182-1'i i:-.
^ 345337 12/11/99 106.18 nrmmcnuSro GAS srxr. 01-*371-311-31
-/ 345337 12/11 /81 181.29 nzwwcnASCU GAS STMT. 01-*371-3e1'32
I"
( 345337 12/11 /80 • 212.3 • AIwmcGosco GAS STMT. 01-4.371-421-42
| 345337 1e/10 /9 0 41. 97 p/wncsxxco GAS STMT. 01-43 71-622-62 /
.
666.64 • ~ �
|
|'. .• •
• ~°^^ ^^°-cvs '��
• ' \
/
| ` 345 o/ono i .rzx.o:2 km.Stirc/r cnomca. ncvcx»L soppL/ES 01-4220-651-65 `
�,`uz ~� • ^ .
|
°/ '' -' ' ]
/�
~^^^^^ ^•^-cns
` .
•
\ �- - ' -- -----'-'-'- ------'-----------'-------'----- ----------------'---�--------------'-'-------'----------�
�� ' --_`
: ll
. zsun cIry OF So«xonEE �
���TER 1z-1C-x" PAGE s
1 .
''i CHECK NO. DATE 'AMOUNT xswnox zrcn DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT vo. INV. o P.O. n ocuo^:c )
'/ -� ' 13 ^ ' - _-_-____ _-'-_ -_---_ '--_------_-__-_--_'---___'-___'__'-_____ _ _ � . -_ . - ' ' -- �
. `
l 3453*5 12/11 /3 0 15.86 Mnr»n PARTS GENERAL ooppL Ico 01-*220-421-42 ^
'| 345346 12r10 /32 MOTOR PARTS EQUIP. »����������-»u `
`. z^ns^o 12,11^11 ----- 14.77 ---- MOTOR PARTS cx/CLcM*IwT• --- ' ----- 0z-4noz-o1c-31 --------------------- ' -'
/ 3153** ze/uvan 181.16 MOTOR PARTS VEHICLE nArnT. 01-4232-*21-42
" -'_ 217 • 43 • --_-__--_ '
l'c'i
_ - ___-_-. _''------- � -_'_-- -__ - ,
.l ^ "^^^^ "^"-cxs
| � r`
|'' 3453 4A i" 7 a - -3 -. 1.:5' , 3 - -- ' -- Rn[t .- . -- f if( - IF ft �
i�i �� —
-'--'------- ----�-|`�
522 •05 •
� I. . ,
|'"
] 3953*9 12/10 186 -- �����f• --- '''V��t�f RE�i[i§f�i ���r.�E�Ji�� ' - .. -.
� 332.00 •
|,'
, i7`
!' °^°^^" - ' '' -_-'�_--__-___� ___----__---___�---_'__-______-_---'_--�-_-_____-____--_-_-_--_-�. �- - . � ,■
.' ^*"-CKt ' '�
— 345355 12/13 180 � _ �___����� _������n_p����� __�������_�A�wr� ��'����_�o���� 65699 |'�
■'! m,�o-�--- -----'--- - - --------- '-
. [..
E ^^^^•• ''
^^*-cxs _ _ �`
.. a�sa�r 12/13/40 �zn�po m-n SIGN c�. GENERAL ooppLsn 01-4220-539-62 , '�
345357 _ . 12/10/80 . � ___��� ________�Tsms & n7�p��_M/��. _31:*��0-^u�-�o .
I. �o� �o _'
�/ ^ " �� -' - -- — ' '-' ' HI
,J , ,,^°, |�
� � ^~^_cxS
' 345307 12/o ap.�s NW eccl TELEPHONE a ou
oz-c�-�-
. 3 m m
| 345387 12/11 140 -_' 93 ^? 1 �u ���� TELEPHONE '�-����-���-��
s
' �
| | 45387 on3/«n 30. 77 Nu BEii --''-- TELEPHONE --' --'' --- 0^-4""^-^ 4 ^-^°
'l 345387 12/11 /50 61. 74 NW ncLL TELEPHONE 01-4321-151-15 L/
' ' 345387 12/1?n1 19. 91 NW REL L TELEPHONE v-*r- '•
• •i 345387 ie/o/o0 l02•56 NW BELL ---- TELEPHONE --- 1'���8^--� •
.�
./ s*ssxr 12/1 /80 291. 31 ' NW BELL rFLcp*omc o-'---'1-' �
| '. o395397 _ �g _ 65.?s �o g��� TELEPHONE �`-`^"^-"^-"^ '
� - , � - -��� �`��
|-/ *smr m/��/,o op��� �u § - f�ic ' •••••• ' - �x ]
~ 345387 '
r 12r13/31 59.12 NW HELL TELEPHONE �-^3uz-»^1-^1 ' `i
345387 12/13/30 o n2.56 NW HELL TELEPHONE 1-43z1-v1-vu
395387 iu�i�/nj ' �ip~�* -' - m� �c�� - - --- --'--- fcL�p���� - - - -- /�-�jai-i^i-i§ '
��
R65. 21 ^ `~
/ �..
' -| ��n�oa 12 7 �. hh� . �j .. �� n�f. �p��. ' tx�� b�d. ' - ' �o�ioi�-�o��ko
| [' 345388 12/
,� , 11/n1 NW nm np�y pw�zwc xscwr *s-�ao-p�� � ��
n.vz",�� ° ^ ^ -p �.
�•
`. ^^^
. •••-cxx ,
|
xz.'c ^
•• 345413 12/10 /3r• 83. TO ILO onrIw,7w oxonv GENERAL soppL IEs 11-4220-421-92 58468
._ ' !
`/
`i ^^"^^^ '. _ f
• /^! ^^•-cg
345428 12/13 /BO . . 31:300.07 PATCH/NJ:
xrpnxrxxLu OTHER pnnr•scnvIcc 56-*p ��
3,00 • ��n-���-� xcou
`
•
`
' �---�.��_--''_--_---_--'_'-_
1 ,... I. S91 c/r oru*»nOPcc __. _CHECK REGI STER 12-10_8e "a:E . 7 _ r.
'
n NO. P o • v yc �c
|' (HECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ,�s ococn�pr�om ACCOUNT n. �wo. w . . cvx �
! _ __ �____ _ _ _ . . ____ _ ___ .
^
� ��s�xv 12/10 /90 285.00 HAROLD PASS x^:*zwcxr RENTAL 01-*382-421-42
`
J zu5.nn •
! .. - __ � -� --- --'------'— -----------------'-----''---'----'--'--'-----------------'- --- ~
' ^^^^°^ "^^
� '!
/ ''. 3*5434 12/10 /90 ' -- 5��00 - � -- ' -- PlfNEY BOWES '------� OFC•EOUIP•RT[. 950532 - '
l
39.00 • r
• ^""..^ - - - ---------'--------'---'------'----'----'---------'----'---__----- __- '�- �����k� | | I
• .
3454 38 12/10 /9 0 65u.83 � PRIOR LAKE Ann. ICE CONTROL I
�LS• ' !
656.83 • |
. .
•^^°^~ ^^^-cxs '�
— - -_- - .... -- . ------ ''-_ ----_--__'_'-- ___ _ ___________________ -- _. ....... ___ . - -
345457 �crznwvo �a. nxn!o SHACK OFC. SUPPLIES 01-4210-331-33 315344 r
.� '- -�o���-�- _ ._ - --- -__ - '--.--�
|'
i
^ ^^ cxv
• ^ ^^^ ^^ - i'
,'
3454 61 ie/11 /9� -- ���� �� ------- ���NU[��� � q���l�� --- ---- ��W�qu[ - ��q'[��� - ' ---Dl�a�D���2i�^��-� �� '
| �
' � 122.70 • !
.
. ^^^^^^ i II ■ - t R t __--_--_'- _ - '_-_----_'----_-'-__-__--___-_---_-'_-_---- - --_� — ^
n��^oo mrr/o� • s,o1 RING FIRE Ex/s. courp. oxImr. n1-*ruo-3cz- !
oa 22 -
� - ---- �D0 • '------------------------- • -------'--'---------- --- — -�.
^^"° ••^
_ /'|
'! 1454 77 zzrmp` 34.00 RIES ncxrIwo nLos• nxIw/. 01-4231-311-31
. |`
'
3454 77 12/10 /VI 90.00 nTcy xF.xr/ms BLDG. MA TNT. 01-4231-321-32
' 3^n^ o/ii/nd i5�:Oj - - hlEt REAyiNd --- -- 'DL0G. Mk?NT�-- - '' ----- qtza2Jl421.-42 .^
uo^.oV •
.
-
' • ^ ^^°,° � -� � -� ' ' '- - - -'- ^ �� —r � x 1
. |
`� o^n^/v zz/o/o ` �y nr oxx�o nxoo�r�nwxp-nw nn TOOL puxc�xxc 01-4225-421-42 r�xu�z
` ^
���^��' 12/10 /40 -�- 77.25 ---- UAV7URAOUEY»gN�P -- O�.?0DL �Untq8OE' -- 7[l . - - -^229~441-44 §S9894
!-.
^•: 134.32 * . :.,,,
'! '~
' ^^^"^^ "^-cx§ .°
' r
1 r,
' o s^n �z/��/pz 9. 23 S « u OF SHAKOPEE BLDG. wxzmr. 01-4231-1 8/-10 '.
1
.. ' . 2r ^
`/ ;._
�� .' ^".°. ^^°-cxx
L n*s^"� u/��pu u.^r SCOT rn, RECORDER GENERAL nopp�cn '..:1-4220-1.21-12 1.
~' '
'x*5^yn 12/10 /4 .:/ q.ro SCOTT c,,. RECORDER GENERAL SUPPLIES 1?1-4220-141-1"
7.4C •
• '''/ ^ ^^^^^ ^^- xx [l
^
3454 3? 12/13/81: m."', SCOTT cr,. rxcusoncn GENERAL soppL TES c1-*223-151-15
1 •
• ,
N
1 ..,. , - 198' CTTY OF SHAKOPEE CHECK REGISTER 12- 10 -80 PA gE 8
'i CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. it 7 .0. q 9ESSA3E 1
"1 13.80 •
1. •u••• _ - - - - •• • —CKS o
145501 12/10/90 17.785.00 SHAKOPEE FIRE RELIEF PENSIONS —FIRE 01- 4142 - 321 -32 •
. 345501 12/10/90 18,134.79 SHAKCPEE FIRE RELIEF REMIT —OTHER COIL. 82- 4930- 911 -91 1:•
35.919.73 • die.
1': 345502 12/13/80 6.65 SHAKOPEE FORD VEHICLE MAINT. 01 -4232- 331 -33
i' 3455'2 12/10/90 - 2.79 SHAKOPEE FORD VEHICLE MAINT. _ 01-4232-411-41 "-
I ' 345512 12/10 /91 12.01 SHAKOPEE FORD VEHICLE MAINT. 01 -4232- 421 -42 ''"
1• 20.65 •
ri •
r I, •u.•• •••—CKS i,
r.
345505 12/13/'10 14•48 SHAKOPEE LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES 01 -4220- 639 -62 '
• .• 345505 12/10/00 8.04 SHAKOPEE LUMBER BLDG. MAINT. 01- 4231 - 622 -62 '"
1 .•1' 22.52 • '•
• ••••.• •••—CKS
1 345512 12/19/0!1 13..00 TOM SIEBENALER GENERAL SUPPLIES 22- 4220 - 196 -19 "
1 . •
1 • 135.00 • ':
• •.f•.. •R. —CKS
1
1'• 345517 12/10/97 507.00 SPUC GEN•R LIAB.INS. 01- 4360 - 911 -91 i.
,
345517 12/10/90 259.8g __..._._. SPUC _._..-- _----- .-- _.-- -•_- -•— • ELECTRIC STMT. 01-4370-181-18 ^,
f
1 345517 12/10/90 278.39 SPUC ELECTRIC STHT. 01- 4370 - 102 -18
345517 12/19/10 211.05 SPUC ELECTRIC STMT. 01- 4370 - 311 -31
345517 12/10/90 133. SPUC ELECTRIC STMT. 11- 4370 - 321 -32
i - , 349517 12/10/90 19.51 SPUC ELECTRIC STMT. 91 -4370- 351 -35 f
345517 _ 12/10/90 422.12 _ ___ __ _ SPUC _ELECTRIC _STMT.________ —
11- 4370 - 421 42 ' :,
34551 1 184.55 SPUC ELECTRIC STHT 01 -4370- 427 -42
� —, 345517 12/15/90 90.07 SDUC ELECTRIC STMT. 01- 4370 - 611-61 •
1•" 345517 12/10 /90 22.91 SPUC ELECTRIC STHT. 51-4370- 622 -62
'1 345917 1 34.23 SPUC ELECTRIC STMT. 01 -4370- 625 -62
H 345517 12/10/90 68.04 SPUC ELECTRIC STHT. 01- 4370 - 628 -62 ,
345517 12/13/99 1,448.07 SPUC CITAL— IMPROVEMENTS 22- 4519- 196-19
345517 12 /10 /n0 570.00 SPUC AP
WATER METERS — 49 91
30- 91
P3
'" 393517 12/1•)/80' 1,250.00 SPUC WATER CONNECTS 93- 4939- 911-91 •..I
5,579.66 •
L1 345518 12/13/•47 23.00 ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL 01.000 TESTS 1 1- 4425 - 313 -31 ,
i' 23. 00 • •
•
;••• • ••• •. •••—CKS
•(•- 345520 12/10/91 33."0 STARKS CLEANING BLDG. MAINT. 111- 4231 - 181 -10
I' =; 345520 12/19/92 17.09 STARKS CLEANING BLDG. MAINT. 01-4231-1R2 —IR
345520 12/11/99 17.00 STARKS CLEANING BLDG. MAINT. '31- 4231 - 311 -31
' '1 345520 12/11 /RQ — i3.95 STARKS CLF4NTtJG 13106. ` »TNT. 51 - 4231 - 4 2 1 -42 / '
n • 5� • ."
8
^
,
' ___ _________
�
��no cr?,o� « 1 0 -10-80 PA?E -'_ � _--
�
' 4 cxccn NO. DATE
' vmo1 uNr xcmnmx ITEM ucscnIPrIom ACCOUNT NO. Imx• 11 P.O. 11 n cs SAGE �
'
|'
^� . - '- ' - - '- -
� �' -'- �-
---'-- - . — -- -----
--'-- -- ---
-----' — - - — -
--------- -- — --- - - -
- - ' - -- ' - - -
- �--'".\
�x/mw«n zex ^ �y STEINS INC. moo • MA • 01-4231-311-31 �na� � �
`i 345522 ~ ^ ^ ,�
` 1co.r * _---�- -_' ^
,! '_- .-._--.'_-_-_--_--_'___--_--_____
' .
.
| °°^""^ ^^^-�^�
_L ----- -
hi ' ��s 12/10 /F13 ' ' � ----������- ---- �O���������. -- , -- ' -- ENG R.SERV /CE ------------ 22-43i5-1V6-i9 � i7u94 --
/ ''! 315525 xorzn/no 1,46*.00 SUBURBAN cNn• cmnn.ocnnIcc so-^zzc-3o-91 000cop
•`| 345525 12/10 180 10.147.79 .r� sV��nBmv���� cms ����x���� ���v������������vu*n -'�- -'- ' ^
'
" '----�-- ----- 1i1937.7�* -'-- .,.
.
. ,.
". z�sn�o �z����9O ���y� _�V��gon���ss�nu�p. orc. oop,�zsn nz-*zm~zzz�zc . _ �__
''' 345526 �zxm/*n ---�o.�� -'--- o o�� BUSINESS c����. — �l���i��2ll-3I _ |
' " 3*5526 ox1n/no 15.90 SUEL BUSINESS cooIp. GENERAL auppLsn 01-4220-121-12 P
'. 3455e6 12/10/110 'z^.un »os��u�[����
165.42• —'--- ' '
�1
-'--'' -----
' 345527 12/10 /10 l.� SyPEnxMExIcx GENERAL SUPPLIES 01-*220-411-41 10886
"� 345527 �z11o�i --- 4*30 --- sopcRApcnzcx - FUEiS& iIM . 10886 '/
' ^s '- p • • |-'
..
° ^°^ = ***_CKS ''.I
345531 12x13/10 22. OIL _--_---_ cO//p.n» TNT. 0z-4z30-621-ap �
22.50 • /'.
: | ,^,°°, ^^^-cx�
!^' -- --'- ---- - ---------'-------------------- --- ---------- ------'- -- --- -.`�
' -/ 3^n53n 12/11 /59 79~c ASSOC ITCH n�, Inc BLDG rxz~runcp. 01 1231 181 171 3579
-
|^ � . _ _
-� - ---'--�� --- — '---- --- - — '-- --' ---'-------' - . ''
^ � •
.
^^^-cxz
. • "°" ^" '--____-- . j
..
!� ��
' 345552 12/13 /80 16.15 TELEDYNE POST OFC. SUPPLIES c1-^zm-vu-11 9682 �.
-_-!a��5 ^
- -' - -
- ^"^-c'� �^
r/ °^"^^^
•
3455 itii51,i5. ' • • ' 21.5..46'' - UNIFVfOl't UNLIFIffitili' --- tLOrHi0d.4itQ.sdUtn: . 61:4225-Si2-3I -
275 .41 ^
.
- - .-. .. -- .. - -- ���
° ^°°^" R^Lt
.
345593 12/10 MO �o1.z VALLEY IND. PROPANE MOTOR FUELS & Lou, 11-4222-*21-42
/ 3os933 - 12/13 /56 ' j1.k� VALLEY Iwo, PROPANE MACHINERY RENTAL :1-43^2-311-31 r1
. 3*5593 12,10,3" 61.79 vxLLc, IND. PROPANE mozxImcxv xromL 51-43;12-421-42 .`'
394. 31 • ' ��
•
:
,,^, ^^"-cns
•-•
' • �
i ^ ����np 12/i9 /90 97 .79 VON x�oc & ASSOC. OTHER Pxor.xcxvicc 24-4315-192'19 '
~ ' 97.71 • �1
} ' cr
" .k� �
°=^^^ •^^-c
1 . ^
���������_��_������_����_�� ���������� �������������_������������_����������_�����������
•• •
/'
.. \ 1381 cx?v_�r _�� _-_--_---'--' - ����p-�o . ��n� _
.! �| ' `
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM ococmIprInw ACCOUNT NO. xmv• o P.O. v 4cnI»3c
1 ,
' ` 3456 36 1.2110 fan 704• 24 XEROX • orc.cuwIp.nrL. o1-4000-»zz �
., . 204• 24• _--_-' -------__'___-
, nj °,°°,, ' ^^^—rxs ,I.: ' "
' nv5a52 12/10 /8h �
— --'--''-- CO. -----------� ���42��5
(' '^ oo a � IA
/
'' .xa * •,
.� /
^. 345653 12/13 -1 80 ------ �EPHFO• ----- ERA[-SUPP[I�S 01-•4220.-4 �
1�44 '---'-'---- '-- |`.
' ''. 47.90 • . ..
[. °^,°,, '�-- ----'--------'------------ --- ---------- -'--- --� -CKh
( .|
'! owozoa zc/z 275.0: �l�m�v���� �-����������� ,^
275• 00 --'-----' * ------
,
'! ^^"^^ --�-- ----' ---�--------------- •
---__-___'' _ __ _ °"^-cnn |-
- --��������.��'- -- �O��'�[ - ����� -----
/
/ |' 19.44 FUND 15 TOTAL . r .
'` ���39.nr FUND 22 TOTAL
' - --' -- 112.32 --- � ---- FUND 2*TOT AI .'
( ' 16 .535.00 FUND 33 TOT AL -
-5? _-_ F4Ng TOTAL _---_ _--'---_----__'-_-_--__-_-__ --. - • - �'
' [991o.o FUND Sc TOT AL
-
t � 10 9047 .79 ponn 58 TOTAL |`
� .
256.04 FUND TOT AL ____�___ � .. _-
1:, -�- -----''' --'---18 9134.79 FUND 82 TOTAL .
/ '''' 1 1820 . 30 ruwn un TOT AL `
•• � .•
' ' 1f�92h4� ---- ' f�fAL
— '- ' - - - - -- ---'---'------_-- ..
,
^
., - ' ' �- - ___ - -� -__- -'-__' _--- _-__-_ _-- �_______ - _ .
(!'
.
.-- -'' - '_- . . ' ' - - - ' ' - __ '_
'
' ..
['| �
[ ' - � � - --- ' ' — - ' -- - -'-----' - - � - - -- -- - - � -
/ `� `
.
� . ' -' ... - . _. .. . - . -- . ' �
� 1 '
'
- ' ' - -
'
� .
, ' _ .
�-
.~ �
- _- - - .'
| ' l• • |
~ 1 |
| � -
Nov. '80 -Page 6
DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR _ CK.AMT. CK.NO.
11.4315.811.81 11.1010 127.50 Other Prof. Services Mary Lou Anderson ' 127.50 6885
11.4315.811.81 11.1010 374.00 Other Prof. Services Louise Anderson 374.00 6886
11.4230.811.81 11.1010 60.85 Equip. Maint. /Rep. Copy Duplicating Prod. 60.85 6887
11.4315.811.81 11.1010 200.00 Other Prof. Services Pearl King 200.00 6888
11.4351.811.81" 11.1010 270.00 ' Printing & Reprod. Minn. School District 270.00 6889
11.4371.811.81 11.1010 46.72 Natural Gas & HTG Minnegasco 46.72 6890
11.4390.811.81 11.1010 40.00 Conf. & Schools Mark McQuillan 68.56 6891
11.4330.811.81 11.1010 28.56 Travel Expense "
11.4321.811.81 11.1010 58.92 Telephone Northwestern Bell Tel. 58.92 6892
11.4315.811.81 11.1010 68.00 Other Prof. Services Mary Jo O'Brien 68.00 6893
11.4315.811.81 11.1010 208.25 Other Prof. Services Barb Peterson 208.25 6894
11.4315.811.81 11.1010 137.50 Other Prof. Services Tuire Rinta 137.50 6895
11.4391.811.81 11.1010 10.50 Dues & Subscriptions Shakopee Valley News 10.50 6896
11.4232.811.81 11.1010 27.75 Vehicle Maint. /Rep. City of Shakopee 27.75 6897
11.4210.811.81 11.1010 34.01 Office Supplies Suel Business Equip. 34.01 6898
11.4315.811.81 11.1010 190.00 Other Prof. Services Mike Sortum 190.00 6899
11.4315.811.81 11.1010 136.00 Other Prof. Services Joe Supplee 136.00 6900
11.4315.811.81 11.1010 120.00 Other Prof. Services Gary Volding 120.00 6901
11.4315.811.81 11.1010 200.00 Other Prof. Services Maxine Weinandt 200.00 6902
01.4390.201.20 01.1010 40.00 Confer. & Schools U of M 40.00 6903
81.4923.911.91 81.1010 4,662.66 PERA Withholding Ex. Dir. PERA 4,662.66 6904
81.4925.911.91 81.1010 4,870.89 Remit /Ins. Bankers Life 4,870.89 6905
•
•
Nov. '80-Page 7'
DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS
VENDOR CK. AMT. CK. N0.
58.4514.911.91 58.1010 28,498.20 Road Construction Mn Valley Surfacing 28,498.20 6906
01.4512.151.15 01.1010 150.00 Capital- Office Eq. Calculators, Inc. 150.00 6907
81 .4931.911.91 81.1010 610.00 Payroll Savings 1st Nat'l. /Shakopee 610.00 69 -8
{ 85.1090 85.1010 1,00.0,000.00 Investments 1st Nat'l./Shakopee 1,000,000.00 • 6909
ti
81.4920.911.91 81.1010 5,389.62 Fed. Withholding 1st Nat'l. /Shakopee 5,389.62 6910
81.4921.911.91 81.1010 4,363.74 SIT Withholding Comm. of Revenue 4,363.74 6911
81.4922.911.91 81.1010 11,728.00 FICA Withholding Dept. of Personnel 11,728.00 6912
01.4220.639.62 01.1010 324.63 General Supplies Shakopee .Lumber Co. 324.63 6913
01.4152.331.33 01.1010 287.01 Unemployment Comp. Minn. UC Fund
287.01 6914
01.4231.181.18 01.1010 34.50 Bldg. Maint. /Repair Assoc. Mech. Contr. Inc. 34.50 6915
22.4513.196.19 22.1010 1,070.39 Easement Harold Marschall & Marie 1,070.39 6916
$1,064,368.20
$1,064,368.20
Fund Totals
01 - General Fund $ " 836.14
11 - Joint Rec. Fund 2,338.56
22 - 4th & Minnesota 1,070.39
58 - 80 -B Improvements 28,498.20
81 - Payroll Trust 31,624.91
85 - Investment Trust 1,000,000.00
$1,064,368.20
Dec. '80 -Page 1
DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR CK.AMT. CK.NO.
5.6.4514.403.41 56.1010 .28,729.66 Road Construction Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. - 28,729.66 6917
22.4509.196.19 22.1010 2,154.32 Capital - Other Erickson Construction, Inc. 6,643.44 6918
41.4509.911.91 41.1010 4,489.12 it
56.4980.403.41 56.1010 314.44 Refund Maryann Siedow 314.44 6919
81.4923.911.91 81.1010 4,767.59 Remit -PERA Executive Dir. -PERA 4,767.59 6920
81.4920.911.91 81.1010 5,432.58 Remit -FIT 1st Nat'l. Bank - Shakopee 5,432.58 6921
81.4931.911.91 81.1010 610.00 Remit -Say. Deduc. 1st Nat'l. Bank - Shakopee 610.00 6922
71.4411.911.91 71.1010 30,260.42 Current Use Charge Metro Waste Con. Comm. 34,467.92 6923
71.4412.911.91 71.1010 4,207.50 Reserve Capacity "
01.4390.331.33 01.1010 350.00 Conf. & Schools Ammerican Rec. Equip. Assc. 350.00 6924
01.4220.312.31 01.1010 50.00 General Supplies A & B Auto Electric 50.00 6925
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 21.00 Other Prof. Serv. Lillian Abeln 21.00 6926
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 30.00 Other Prof. Serv. Harriet Bartyzal 30.00 6827
01.422.181.18 01.1010 205.79 General Supplies Butler Paper 205.79 6928
01.4315.111.11 01.1010 53.63 Other Prof. Serv. Diane S. Beuch 165.00 6929
01.4315.191.19 01.1010 111.37 11
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 30.00 Other Prof. Serv. Rita Bodmer 30.00 6930
01.4391.311.31 01.1010 22.04 Dues & Subscript. Bureau of Business Practice 22.04 6931
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 24.00 Other Prof. Serv. Pat Clemens 24.00 6932
01.4330.121.12 01.1010 10.92 Travel Expense Judith S. Cox 10.92 6933
01.4315.131,13 01.1010 19.50 Other Prof. Serv. Sharon Fernholz 19.50 6934
47.4610.911.91 47.1010 30,000.00 Principal Payments First Bank Minneapolis 32,847.60 6935
47.4611.911.91 47.1010 2,835.00 Interest Payments "
47.4612.911.9'1 47.1010 12.60 Paying Agent Fees "
P
• Dec. '80-Page 2
DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR _ CK.AMT. CK.NO.
01.4220.321.32 01.1010 435.45 General Supplies Fremont Industries 435.45 6936
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 24.00 Other Prof. Serv. Kim Haller 24.00 6937
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 62.14 Other Prof. Serv. Lynn Headley 62.14 6938
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 24.00 Other Prof. Serv. Rose Jasper 24.00 6939
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 39.00 Other Prof. Serv. Maetta Jurewicz 39.00 6940
01.4980.711.71 01.1010 81.52 Refunds Roman Kopp 81.52 6941
01.4230.321.32 01.1010 197.94 Equip. Maint. & Rep. Lion Uniform 197.94 6942
01.4391.411.41 01.1010 10.40 Dues & Subscript. Landscape Architecture 10.40 6943
01.4230.123.17 01.1010 12.00 Equip. Maint. & Rep. Lanier 12.00 6944
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 19.50 Other Prof. Serv. Joan Lynch 19.50 6945
56.4312.403.41 56.1010 272.03 Engineering Services Minn. Valley Surv. & Eng. 272.03 6946
01.4391.311.31 01.1010 30.00 Dues & Subcript. MN Chiefs of Police Assn. 30.00 6947
01.4382.311.31 01.1010 208.00 Machine Rental Malkerson Leasing Co. 208.00 6948
01.4230.622.62 01.1010 67.32 Equip. Maint. & Rep. Miracle Rec. Equip. Co. 67.32 6949
15.4391.911.91 15.1010 25.00 Dues & Subcript. Minnesota Chapter -NAHRO 25.00 6950
01.4980.711.71 01.1010 81.52 Refunds Brad Norwood 81.52 6951
23.4610.911.91 23.1010 1,900.00 Principal Payments Northwestern /St. Paul 2,300.00 6952
23.4612.911.91 23.1010 400.00 Paying Agent Fees
01.4499.311.31 01.1010 145.55 Misc. Now Sports, Inc. 145.55 6953
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 19.50 Other Prof. Serv. Helen O'Brien 19.50 6954
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 24.00 Other Prof. Serv. Janet O'Connor 24.00 6955
01.4231.181.1'8 01.1010 180.00 Bldg. Maint. & Rep. E. L. Prahm, Builder 180.00 6956
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 24.00 Other Prof. Serv. Kathy Radtke 24.00 6957
Dec. '80 =Page 3
DEBIT ACCOUNT CR. ACCT. AMOUNT BATCH REMARKS VENDOR . CK.AMT. CK.NO.
01.4315.121.12 01.1010 16.50 Other Prof. Serv. Rose Schleper 16.50 6958
01.4330.411.41 01.1010 71.40 Travel Expense Fulton Schleisman 71.40 6959
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 19.50 Other Prof. Serv. Ray Schmitt 19.50 6960
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 24.00 Other Prof. Serv. Frank Schneider 24.00 6961
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 21.00 Other Prof. Serv. Joyce Schwartz 21.00 6962
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 27.00 Other Prof. Serv. Glenda Spiotta 27.00 6963
01.4392.141.14 01.1010 13.00 Licenses State Board of Assessors 13.00 6964
48.4310.911.91 48.1010 805.00 Legal Services Smith, Juster,Feikma 805.00 6965
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 19.50 Other Prof. Serv. Doris Ann Solseth 19.50 6966
01.4231.181.18 01.1010 154.00 Bldg. Maint. & Rep. Stewart Interiors 154.00 6967
01.4220.121.12 01.1010 46.00 General Supplies Vaughn's 46.00 6968
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 27.00 Other Prof. Serv. Louise Vyskocil 27.00 6969
01.4315.131.13 01.1010 28.50 Other Prof. Serv. Lillian Weinandt 28.50 6970
01.4420.121.12 01.1010 212.30 Office Supplies Wilcox Paper Company 212.30 6971
01.4430.151.15 01.1010 89.60 Travel Expense Linda Willemssen 89.60 6972
$120,598.65 $120,598.65
Fund Totals
01- General Fund $ 3,383.39
15 -HRA 25.00
22 -4th & Minn. 2,154.32
23 -K -Mart 2,300.00
41 -PIR Fund 4,489.12
47 -73 Series B 32,847.60
48 -74 Imp. Fund 805.00
56 -80 -A Imp. 29,316.13
71 -Sewer Fund, 34,467.92
81- Payroll Trust 10,810.17
0 10,05'18.65
(.7D
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg M. Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Workmens Compensation Insurance Policy
DATE: December 11, 1980
Introduction:
The City of Shakopee's Work Comp. Policy is due for renewal January
1, 1981. Three possibilities of providing coverage for 1981 have
been reviewed.
Background:
The City has had Transamerica write our policy for several years.
We have had good relations and service with the company and they
desire to keep our business. Many cities are having trouble just
finding companies to write insurance for them. The League of Cities
has therefore started a self insurance program to meet this need
for cities.
The three possibilities are to continue our current policy, convert
to a new type policy with our company or to go with the League pro-
gram. The first possibility of continuing our current policy puts
a cap of 8% on the dividends that we may receive but has a higher
likelyhood of a very small dividend if we incur a higher loss ratio.
For this reason further evaluation concentrated on the League plan
or Transamericas new plan. Under either plan the discounted standard
premium would be the same based on rates set by the Workmen Compensa-
tion Policy Service. The difference comes after the end of the year
when the payrolls are audited and dividends declared, if any. What
we should be looking at is the bottom which is not certain until
after the end of the year. The League program offers a 15% discount
at the beginning of the year when the deposit premium is paid. After
the close of the year, we get an additional bill for premiums based
on actual payroll. For 1980, the League is anticipating a dividend
of 8.3% to all insureds, another 8.3% depending on loss ratio, to
those with loss ratios of less than 34% and also 8.3% which the
cities don't receive but goes into a reserve account. Total reduct-
tions then should be between 23 and 31% for the insured.
Transamerica does not offer a similar discount up front. For 1981,
depending on loss ratio, we could expect a dividend of 0 -33 %. At
our current loss ratio it would be 25 %. If our loss ratio goes
over 20 %, we would receive no dividend the first year. Transamerica
will write this as a one year policy but will calculate it as a three
year policy.
This will smooth things out for us and the company and they can return
a higher dividend to us over the long run when using a three year
Policy basis. The dividends we could achieve under the current policy
are about 25% of the dividends that we could achieve under the new
Transamerica policy.
?v
John K. Anderson, City Administrator
Workmens Comp.
December 11, 1980
Page 2
Other factors:
The League program is in the first year of operation. Claims may
back up somewhat after having a good first year. Thansamerica has
many years of experience and a good record and the City has a good
record with them. Transamerica wants the City's business, we are
not scrambling for a carrier. The League has $4,300,000 in cap-
italization. If claims go over that amount, the member cities will
be assessed the overage. Transamerica can not come back and ask
for more money. An unlikely,but possible,case would be where fat-
ality for a police officer could cost up to $1,200,00 and one or
more claims of this size could have a serious impact on the program.
Transamerica has much more resources available.
Transamerica handles all aspects of our policy. The League program
is through the League with another company administering it and using
third party adjusters.
The League program does appear to be well planned and sound conceptually,
and I don't intend to down -play or discredit it. It does appear that
if things do go well for the League somewhat higher dividends could be
achieved than on the Transamerica plan.
Alternatives:
1. Renew present policy
2. Joint League program
3. Convert to new Transamerica policy
Recommendation:
I would recommend that the City stay with Transamerica under a new
policy because there is an established track record as opposed to a
new program. We deal with one entity. We are committing ourselves
to only one year but if we stay with the company, our dividends are
calculated on a more favorable three year basis. The company can
not come back and assess us in the event of large losses.
r
GMV /ljw
1 .
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES' INSURANCE TRUST
Self- Insured Workers' Compensation Quotation Data
Plan Administrator
Employee Benefit Administration Co.
6950 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 430
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426 •
Telephone (612) 544 -0311
•
Name of City: Shakopee
Policy Period: From January 1, 1981 T January 1, 1982
Estimated Annual Premium:
•
Estimated Deposit
Code Rate Payroll Premium
•
Street and Road Construction 5506 $ 8. 53 100,450 8,568
Waterworks 7520 5.42 20,000 1,084
Electric Power Co. 7539 3. 69 105,000 3 •
Sewage Plant 7580 3.75 .
Firemen (Not Volunteer) 7706 9. 87
Firemen (Volunteer) 7708 34. 74 10,011 p 3,478
Policemen 7720 6.07 238,260 14,462
Store Risks Retail 8017 1.34
Clerical Office 8810 .23 155,050 311
Building Operations 9015 5.95 25,000 1,488
Restaurants and Bars 9079 2. 58
Parks 9102 4.28 77,740 3,327
Street Cleaning 9402 11. 36
Municipal Employees 9410 2. 07 111,540 2,309
•
Manual 38,902
Experience Modification Factor .96
Standard Premium 37,346
Premium Discount 5.131
y Discounted Standard Premium 32,215
LMCIT Discount 15 To 4,832
•
Net Deposit Premium 27,383
The foregoing quotation is for a deposit premium based on your estimate of payroll. `Your
final, actual premium will be computed after an audit of payroll subsequent to the close of
your policy year and will• be subject to revisions in rate or experience modification. While
• you are a member of the LMCIT Workers' Compensation ,Plan, you will be eligible to
participate in distributions from the Trust based upon claims experience and earnings
of the Trust.
Emplo ee Benefit : dministration Cc
I .._— if 4f .
•
December 11, 1980
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
RE: Worker's Compensation
Alternative Plan: Net Retention Pa rticipating Plan
Insurance Company: Transamerica Insurance Co.
Submitted by: Capesiu s Agency, Inc . - Shakopee, Minnes of a
For the deposit premium, standard rates will apply includirg the
experience credit (when available) and the premium discount.
The City qualifies for the Net Retention Participating Plan. Under
this plan, the City will receive a dividend depending upon its loss
experience for the policy perio d. The maximum dividend that could
be paid would be approximately 32%.
Payment of the dividend will be made in installments. The first
dividend calculation date will be 18 months after inception date. If
any claims remain open at this date , 50% of the dividend will be paid.
The second calculation date is twelve months later, that is, 3 0
months after inception. If any claims remain open at that time, 75%
will be paid. The final calculation date is twelve months later
(42 months after inception) . At this time, the entire dividend will
be paid.
Of course if the re are no open claims at any of the ca Iculation dates,
the entire dividend will be paid. As a practical matter, to allow
time for the paper work, the checks will be sent about two months
after the above dates.
/ss
12-11-80
•
.. " , CITY ® F S H A K O P- "' E
Q i 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
: ' - - - - . -
M E M O 7(1C)
TO: ` John Anaprgnn City Administrator
FROM: J .• -8-11 • • ' - - Dept.
SUBJECT: Dorothy F.gan sewer problem •
DATE: December 11, 1980
This memo is intended to provide you with a background of the sewer
problem at the Dorothy Egan residence at 129 N. Main St.
Doug Reeder and I met with Dorothy Egan on Tuesday, Oct. 14, 1980
to discuss her sewer problem. During the course of this meeting, several
solutions to the problem were suggested to her:
1. Install a private sewer line in the boulevard to the Bluff St.
sewer line which was installed several years ago. However, this solution
would be quite costly because of the rock in the area.
2. Insulate her private sewer line all the way to the sewer main in
the street. We told her that the City would participate in the
project by patching the bituminous surface after the insulating
project had been completed.
3. Re -lay her sewer line at an angle towards First Avenue to pick up
grade so her service line would be at a deeper depth to minimize
the freezing problem. Again, the depth of the rock near the
surface of the street doesn't make this solution practical.
4. Install a cleanout plug alongside of her house so the steaming
crews can gain easy access to her service line. The service line
along side of her house was installed at a depth of 8 - 10 inches.
This has to be considered too shallow for a sewer line.
5. The service line from the house to the main in the street could
possibly have dips or an irregular grade to the street which would
slow the flow enough to freeze it. The service line could be re-
layed, but there isn't much grade to work with. It is important
that the line : drains completely after usage to minimize freezing.
All of these possible solutions were suggested to Mrs. Egan at ,
the Oct. 14th meeting. It was the general consensus that insulating
was the easiest and cheapest solution to the icing problem, but it was
pointed out that this was not the ultimate solution because occasional
icing could still occur. Re laying the sewer line at a safe depth is
•
P. 2 cont.
f
still the surest solution to the icing problem.
Following the meeting, Mrs. Egan elected to insulate her service
line from her house to the curb line only. We feel that this will not
remedy her icing problems because no insulation was installed from the
curb line to the main sewer in the center of the street. This is the
area where the icing seems to occur because the snow plow will always
remove the snow which could act as an insulation.
It was also pointed out to Mrs. Egan that her house was moved to
this location about 1965 or 1966 by Mrs. Doris Dunlap. (The sewer main
was installed in 1945.) Mrs. Dunlap also had freezing problems with the
sewer line during her years of occupancy at this address. The Street
Dept. had been called many times to help steam the service line for
Mrs. Dunlap when she lived at this address. These service calls for
steaming were recorded in our diary, and the dates of these calls were
given to Mrs. Egan to prove that there has always been icing problems
with this sewer. Mrs. Dunlap has indicated that we were wrong because
she has never had problems with her sewer when she lived at that address.
It would seem to me that Mrs. Egan was misinformed as to the condition
of the sewer when she purchased this property, however, I feel that
this is not a problem for the City, but only for the two parties
involved in that transaction.
Mrs. Egan's letter dated Dec. 2, 1980 apparently is intended to
show that she has -paid a lot of money for steaming her service line since
she has obtained the property. It is my feeling that the City is not
liable for the freeze up problem on her private sewer line unless the
icing initially begins in the City main in the street. This is usually
indicated to us by backing up in the dead end Manhole and backing up into
Duane Melchior's home to the north of Mrs. Egan. Generally,the only
icing in the area is in her service line and the other neighbors don't
usually have much trouble. I also feel that the other neighbors use
much more water and this seems to help keep the lines open when they are
shallow. It should be mentioned that if we feel that the icing originated
in the main, we will thaw her line without hesitation. (There is no
charge for this service.)
The City insulates the deadend Manhole at the North end of Main
Street each fall to minimize the possibility of freezing, and the sewer
crews will periodically check and flush the manhole during the winter.
Because of the fact that Mrs. Egan did not attempt to insulate her
p. 3 cont.
service line all the way to the main in the middle of the street, I see
no reason not to believe that her sewer line won't freeze again this
winter season, also, I don't believe that the City should be subject to
any claim or plumber charge for thawing her sewer again this season.
The only way the City could possibly be liable, in my opinion, is if it
is determined that the main had frozen initially, and created an icing
problem on her service line.
P.S. In checking with the City Engineer, the cost to insulate the
balance of Mrs. Egan's sewer. line (that portion lying in the
street) would be $300.00. Also, the City would patch the
street surface, as per agreement.
John K. Anderson
ck_
a---
!
1 • / Nt 773 • cl .
/7 p ,
I :
...; '''\
\' (\
V \
-.4--- ::,s;
9
;:j' d -)
) 0
4
..,,,i • 1,--
>
r% ..
>
" \
4 I
„Ty 1
z-:, y v)-
L,..-
. is NIVUN1
—
a
1
4 -,, I 1/4-1
•
-01.-'doN
,....0, 0 i.)70.1.<;
.. •
/
72 . `7)?> ---c —
.;;---7 .,:f; --A- . y7
„--, „
4, ''.v:zie.:',,A--- hz.f-i-:;„•(..„ e (.?/- c
, •
,2 „a:6_ e... .;-c-5, y - GP 4)
z- -7 ^e..---e RECEIVE)
cr ,I'. 0,C, 7 4 L
DEC 5 1980
c " .. ,11 _..„--_,,, 6-- • 7? 79
----7 /..--) CITY OF SHAKOPq
./( v:// ..- 5://z-ier:--74
,.'
.d,,-,, / 7 c.4-
--,-,/,
/ l (
_.."-c=-7 , 7z-r
. 7
--- - ,,_,___„ 7- ._ _ . „.„ ,...----: z
-7X -- z: 2 ,
i
/
, "
C-7/ "7 , A e..-Le. .,..--L-:-.-7 / , .,-4--z /-- ----4-
1 7
c--)- / L i , e /. 2,,e 7 . e c -/ <---z er'c -6_(.4_47 77v X
---0- . 71, , i76,_.,c,-/-) /--7-, 7 /: • . - i > - i - - ) / ,J--e7 7.- - - 7*- - ", --
C.-
(
4 .„(4 , ./..e, Z e-y. , •
.4.-A__.-i. ,
, -*-2-2 -- )7 • - ,.., _.
/ r
Ar4,161Z"`e ,9c71-/e--
4
. 1
011...
- ' - 1 -
. -
. -
_ .
/ )
,
1;72,
xy 7
,„, 2
- 2,-
,--, /
7/,9 -,
( ,..„,,,-- ,--2z.„- p ---1
/ ---2,--7---- -- - 4--
L , /
$
7 4'.
.,.--,7W y'' l: / -' 7
-*Z-..---eL -.•
,-)---7-z-y - ,---i--,-,... - 7 //(1_,
•
c: 7 _// 6. • '
. , 1 - - 7 . -. ._ _ ,-- ----z----> - ----
----2.--2.- . ,? 22/7, 7 ,
. • Vi
17 L
b j ."--- „,.---.77----.
•
7 t ( . , -i -
L *7 / / c
1 :
,' / (c.. 7 - ' ...---;-;------ - - - --
‘,. _
( C. ". r • :-..:: •: • • r :: i::: !;.• - •i:
/ ,• .:;::• "• . -n!.. 1 ::;%ii::E . iii iii*' ::::: :c ;: :It'
/ ,./ -._ ....,/&:„- /7/7.-, , . . .-- , itli:i:::::::::. '...:::• :::::::: 7 ...,:ii i:I.; ::. ....1,: ,
‘..„.; I (.-- - - "" ,. `-'' ' ' ..." -" "" • .:::::',EZ.,,;::::::::,:si:;:;:i*:-::::i::::;;;;;; ,.,: , iEt
ii:i ii:iii:Liii:■?:1114:1 it;:x1,0*NIA 'Mt b
-, . - • ., •:-: • : • .:::,- : .•:-:.7-;•:_s...;:;-::;:!-:::11..: - : - •,' : 1-1.,:_,t1
, •
X
•-
7 •
. / • z>" •
/ /
/ /
• 7 76
.....„... , 2 i
.--, (...).--, ...C.. 7 ':
• 6 = - 7. , - 77 - 7 - 7:77-7- 7 77.7:- - - -- - - .=.:4,,----;- : , 7 ,,-.-=
.7' .
:,.,•,... . :.,, . ,...:. :.:. : :.-..,..•.. •.:.:.!.,...
. .- ::7.:.1.:::-..:::...-:•:•:•
f4 ., 77 -72 , _c. / ■S , .:i::..:;.;: • :',:.3: : : : :;:;:iiiii:iii:: ; :iii*:::
• :::•i.iiit
:
::..::::::;::.,.:::-:;:!.M:;:.11::r.;::...•..:•:::..:1.1.0.••:;,-..:•i-:•...::.*::
........—.
•
/)...ec
......-
.... ........-.. ,..._ -7
1-
-
/ .---
:7'/ '2 - . '
%
/f`7 /. 6'
/ i , /---- .r." i
. , / 7 ,, / /2 ....,(_. c'- •
(/) :::..:: • • • - • • • • . — • • • • • • • ..•• . • -.- ..-.
• .:.-•:*. ..,.
.
,›.-
.
f
1 7 /2 : , ,.. t_ . 7 . _
, '7
'ft ' - e../‘. ‘-e_ d'd
9 , . ..... 7 K-
7 2
1 ,. „... ..,./
,•:,. , ../‹.7 - -y-
/ q
,- V„ ., A / . '• ''7..1" 4'
'S
.., ri • •--
. 7
-.. 1/1 /' / t
• i 4
_ /
/ k, A.. 1:114:04ii■ilt§t2itq0!ii:*i*4ii]tiiittliitiilifitiliti;3'qi4f:14:*tii
::.:•:•:Z :•:::•:•:•:•: • .:'• :::::: •:::•:•:• : t : :: ;: 1: 2:::`,: *:: :!::: : : • :.:::::::
:: ''.. .....:::..•::::• : • .•.•:••:•:':•:•:•:%%:•:•:::•:•
./ -'"(7 : :: : : : . •:::::%. ;:•:::•:::::::::•::::%::: •::::::::.:::.;;;;:,:;;; ..„:::•4:::
: (c . :•-•:/t.: . --7 ::•,
t ia:s11.....,.,.;:,.,... :' . '......1:,:l...1..1......i:,...;,:..i.:,:•:• •!
. .. -...
t —
. ,
6 .< /: : c:-- / • ---------."-/ -
'
-
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii4 ficiiii4itifit/iiti!iitkiii4aittifiiii
;" .„.... , ,, , .:.::::::4,...,, , k.:....1i:.:,.:•: .•.;::;,„ . :::•::,:...:• . •—::::::,.....„
...:.:- ::::::: ,*:-.:,: ;•iii.::.: :1::.:i::::1,,,-.::::::::.
-.: i,.. 0 ::;:.:ii:::::: ;:i.::: :
r .........,...... ,,: ...„.....„,..,.,:„1„.„. :,.....::.....:,:.:
;....:,:-....:.:::::::•:...:..,:: -:.....:.,..: ::,-,.-..-1:: . ,:: - ,,... ...,. .....;;:. .,: 7; ....;:.::;:.:;::::: :::::.:, . ; :::;:.:.:.:::.:::. ' ;:; :;.:;:;:::
P I i t. i ti "M i f ir rt Vlf I i !!1 i l 1 i itil .11 ii Witt i! iftiqii0t ittNiii!itilillS
: " ::.: 1 : : :■ i i ■ i l il . : ' ,.. : ; F :i ■':1: : : i i i1 .1 ` . :i. : :*;ii::ii:;:ili . ;.:;iii: :: .i.;:!.;i;;'''.0iii.: .:.''' Filiiiiii . ;:i: . : . ;:li::11 . iii ii : : : :' , ii:::: : : i1: : :'..:•.:: : : :::'.: .`Fq 1 ::ii. : ;!!;:::"•E:■;■
:;'''' ii .: ......: ..::1;■ :II i .. :::::;:ii : ::: ; 1!: , ; 4■*::: -... " .t : , :i`...t . J: . .:0; .-- ' : ' . C..;:: :.. : - :: . . .,': :::.: . .*: ::::: :i : ? ::*:: : : % : ■ ::: ■ •• ::::: :7 :.•
.,...... • : : :-:.:.... _:.,....__;._;:i...- -..,..-, . ••-__,.:.... -..•..::,: ... - • •
. ....:'.ii:'-:::: '..: '.i...:;:i.:::;:;-::::::.:,:•i:..;.1:::iii-ii::::.:,:i7....... ...::. ....... ........:-... : •. • '..•:. " . ' . •-•...:.; ' ' •;....:•:' ...:; ':: ....: : . ' :.:::-::.*;:.-
:::::;i:,:iiiiii::::::: :iiii:.ii2.:::;;;;:-, :.,....:*:.:.:':;.:::-:';:-: ...: . . .......-:.; -,:' - :::..:;.::;::: ; :;:.;:ii-:Ii:;••••::: . ': ..::::•::::::;:i:::::::::, iii
i• . '''. '4:7:::::':':'•::::: :. ' ' ." .: ..,:::•.;":.;:!-?..1:ii1:::::: : :,;. ; :;i: ii i i i,-,
Ii
- ..... ......- _. ..... -_-_ _ ...... ......-
_ , -
c)7
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Lease for Copier
DATE: December 11, 1980
The lease for our present copier expires February 15, 1981.
Resolution No. 1766 authorizes staff to execute another rental
agreement for 1981 to keep the same copier.
The 1981 budget does not contain a specific category for the
cost of copier rental. The intent is to charge each department
printing and reproduction category for total copier costs based
on usage. This will reflect truer costs of operation of each
department. Please see the attached memo regarding this.
GV /jms
•
•
r T
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Auditrons for Copier
DATE: December 9, 1980
Introduction
Administration has previously paid the total bill for copier rental
with supplies allocated out to departments. With rising costs and
usage, a more equitable method of charging all departments for
copier costs is desired.
Discussion
Since our current copier was installed in February 1980, usage has
been more than double the rate of the previous copier. We have
averaged over 19,000 cy /mo for the past 9 months. For the 1981
budget there is no separate object code for copier rental. The
total copier cost will be allocated to the departments on a per
copy basis. The three possible methods of allocating costs are
by guesstimate, auditron, or having everyone fill in a log sheet
each time the copier is used.
The guesstimate is subject to gross errors. The log sheet is
inconvenient, frequently forgotten and entails staff time in
tabulating usage. Auditrons are quick, accurate and relatively
convenient. They do however cost money. Installation is $75.00
and each unit is $35.00. They are available for purchase only.
Cost can be spread over the contract life of the copier. We would
probably need 8 units for a total cost of $355.00, spread over 12
months equals $29.58 per month, first year. The auditrons also
may enforce more discipline and help reduce unnecessary copies.
Alternatives
1. Guesstimate allocation
F
2. Log sheet
3. Auditrons
Recommendation
In view of the cost of the copier and the volume we are now
running, I would recommend the auditrons.
GV /jms
• 172-
RESOLUTION NO . 1 766
A Resolution Authorizing Leasing of Office Equipment
WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Council adopted Resolution No. 1553
on January 15, 1980, authorizing leasing of a copy machine; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable to con L i nuc Lo lease a copier.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA that City staff is authorized to execute a
r.erital agreement with Copy Duplicating Products, inc. for, the use of
one Savin Model 600 copier. Price he 470.25 per i on!:h and $$.017
per copy for usage over. 19,000 copies per month. Term of agreement
is to be one year.
Adopted 'in session of the City Council of the City
of Shakopee, ,Minnesota, held this - -- day of
1980.
Mayor o1. t=he C::LLy oL Shakopee
ATTEST:
City C l e r k `- - -- -- --- - --
Approved as to form This
day of ` 1980.
City Attorney
•
. Pk
. `` Pf EH4i CITY ®F S A K •, P E E
` o 7 a. a! 5 • 12 9 East First Avenue, Shakopee, ?fl) i J r � V pee, Minnesota 55379
zSit
MEMO
TO: John Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Larry D. Martin, City Assessor
SUBJECT: Railroad property South of Public Works Bldg.
DATE: December. 9, 198()
INTRODUCTION:
As requested, I have conducted some preliminary calculations
and investigation, directed toward the railroad right -of -way
(R.R.R.W.) South of the Street Department property.
BACKGROUND:
The proper ' procedure for this type of appraisal would be
as follows:
I ' Comparable Data Research
A. Locate R.R.R.W. Sales
B. Estimate Value of Land surrounding R.R.R.W. Sales
C. Determine Applicable Ratio
II Subject Evaluation
A. Estimate value of land surrounding R.R.R.W. subject
B. Apply ratio determined in Step 1 -C
Because of the preliminary nature of this problem, I have
contacted a colleague in the appraisal profession who has had
experience in the appraisal of this type of property. In studies
that he has conducted, a range of 32% to 54% of surrounding land
market value is shown as typical.
To determine a preliminary valuation of the surrounding land, I
have reviewed market transactions of which 5 were selected as
comparable. The unadjusted range put forth is 10,969 to 14,611
per acre. For the sake of developing a .range T will use the
unadjusted average which is roughly .I1 ?,500 per acre.
To the unadjusted average sale price will be applied the per-
centage at the lower spectrum of the range (relating to the 32%
to 54% ratio range discussed earlier), because the subject site
is lacking functional utility, which relates to its long narrow
shape and the fact that it is land locked. Therefore, the pre-
liminary per acre valuation can be calculated as follows:
$12,500 x .'32 = $1,000 per acre.
Probable range of $3,000 to $5,000 per acre.
R
John Anderson
Page 2
December 9, 1980
SUMMARY:
I have calculated the property in question to contain
approximately .96 acres. This would indicate a probable
property value range of roughly $2,900 to $4,800.
In closing I would ask the reader to keep in mind that the
foregoing analysis is not an appraisal nor should it be
construed as such. It is however, a set of preliminary
calculations that may assist in setting forth probable
ranges of value.
LDM:plk
•
� j ji : ~ ' o s E��
\_-L� ��- ~ - ' s .
ti - ' \ -__' / L _ ~^^�hi•
1 i I 1 - ^ � __-- - _-- ___
UTILITY CO 1
7
* 0
IF 1- 'z-I
L
.....
0 ,-,-, ,, .......,
...„
., .........._
SERVICE Ct
BUILDING ''C
E Li
A A. ; A , 7'..,,__1? , ..**"\..........,............,,.......„
, . /* ,...,, 4
. , ,. iii •
_ i i .,,,,_ .,. Iv - , ,, _ ,,,i6
la
1 d A. I ---
8
r I fly E .Id ,
iii _
11 111 1 1
, ,.. 14. t. 1 I. I 6 ii 8 I
■. all ill c. - 1.c. c- C. N.
. 1 file' 1 I AVEli 1
!I , MT 0 IV 2 5 l l' 7 1 \. 5
/ - .
. ` .o '�
| i ---____ ____�'_. � .
� ...-= I .. _.-_-. .. !-___.�o ------� 2 8.F p[xn5Ow
. -_--_-__
---''---- SCHOOL '
r --__-_____ �SSw8Y
� ' ----,---- OF 6OD
__' ' 5 ---__ --- --
CUURCH .
=
'-- \ ~ 1 ---'--�-- ��
� /C�� ■ \ \ AVE. | .1 `� \ \
__. ` \ ~ • •
` `' ` ��
-'-- _ �_,»� '- `~ | ` '^ / -^ 1.
1.... \ _--_ '_____--_-_ __�.-_ ___- -- --_- --__ _ ` _-- __-_ -_-'' ` _-__ | -' T '�
--- -- ' - '-------- -- \
-__- --_ .
/ „It ;, H 4,r.... C 1 T Y s•9 F S H A * P E 7
, 4 ` \ x
IP 4' Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
._'�� . � 129 East First Avenue Shako p
M E M O
John Anderson, City Administrator
TO —
FROM: Larry Martin, City A_ se:, :nor
SUBJECT: --
DATE: Decernbc r 9, l980
Content of Phone Conve r'sa Lion with Mr. Edward McMenomy (d23-1155)
Farmington- Shakopee Assn. Attorney
In my phone •conversation wi Lh Edward McMcnorn he expressed
:interest in what; property the City is inlerested in acquiring.
He also had mentioned an e a r l i e r discussion with :someone fr'orn
the City regarding easernen L:; over the railroad. :r think that
this would involve the drainage and utility easements the City
is planning to acquire east of the J.E.J. Addn.
J also Learned ill the conversation that they are a non - profit
organization whose main :intent; is to split off parcels of land
to members that have adjoining property, then to sell off the
proper't:i.es, th:iL have HO membership i nice( :sI: as quickly as
possible seeking the direct, ( ) . L:; and any indirect cost incurred
through their ownership. You may wish to contact hirrr for
elaboration.
LDPr1 : p l k
•
9 Jv
MEMO TO: John Anderson
City Administrator
FROM: H. R. Spurrier
City Engineer
RE: Description for Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul &
Pacific Railroad Right -of -way
DATE: December 11, 1980
Attached please find the description of the Chicago, Milwaukee,
St. Paul & Pacific Railroad right -of -way southerly of the
Public Works Building. This is the description requested by
Council in a meeting December 2, 1980.
The parcel contains approximately 41,820 square feet or .96
acres more or less.
HRS / j iw
Attachment
...
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY
SOUTHERLY OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE'S PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
ALL THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTIWEST QUARTER (Ez OF SW4)
OF SECTION SIX (6), TOWNSHIP ONE- HUNDRED - FIFTEEN (115) NORTH, RANGE
TWENTY -TWO (22) WEST, SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS,
ALL THAT PART OF THE FORMER CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL &
PACIFIC RAILWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY LYING AND BEING IN THE EAST
HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (E2 OF SW4) OF SAID SECTION
SIX (6) EXCEPTING THE FOLLOWING:
ALL THAT PART OF SAID FORMER CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE,
ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY LYING AND
BEING WESTERLY OF A LINE EXTENDED SOUTHERLY AND
PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF CLIFTON FIRST ADDITION
FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID CLIFTON FIRST
ADDITION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON FILE AND
OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES,
AND LYING AND BEING EASTERLY OF A LINE FOUR HUNDRED
(400) FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO THE ABOVE
DESCRIBED EASTERLY LINE OF SAID CLIFTON FIRST ADDITION.
,4 CITY O SHAKOPEE /0a
F1 � ' M 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
_ 0;
MEMO
TO: John Anderson, City Administrator
FROM:_ T,nrry_Marti n., Asaessor
SUBJECT: George W. Johnson
DATE: December. 8, 1980_
Introduction:
I have received today a letter. of resignation from Mr. Johnson,
which will be effective 12 -19 -80 (See attached). He has accepted
the City Assessor contract with the City of Savage.
Background: -
Mr. Johnson began his employment with the City of Shakopee on
July 20, 1979 as a C.E.T.A. employee. Tn this time frame, his
work progress and, training has progressed quite satisfactorily.
He has been an asset to the Assessing Department and the City of
Shakopee. Furthermore, his education accomplishments in the
assessing field, plus the fact that he received the Savage City
Assessor Contract, is a definite credit to the entire C.E.T.A.
program whose function is to train and prepare workers for
future employment.
Summary:
As Mr. Johnson's direct supervisor, it is my opinion that his
termination of employment with the City of Shakopee be accepted
in good standing. furthermore, I believe he should be complimented
on his participation in this successful application of the
C.E.T.A. Program.
•
LDM:plk
•
' -
• , �C}
y
CITY �� �� �� �� SHAKO "� �� �� V � �� �� ,
�� �� �� �� "�p �� �� ���� ��� ��m` n�� ^ ��� ��
INCORPORATED 1870 cz�������� � '. '
•
129 E. First Ave. 'Shukopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445-3650
December 8, MO \ `.
,
Mr. Larry D. Martin
Shakopee City /\ssc:xmr
129 E. 1st Ave.
Shakopee, Minn. 56379
Dear Larry:
It is with regret that I must notify you of my resignation
which will be effective December 19 1980.
At this time I would like to thank you and the City of
Shakopee for giving mu the Opportunity to work in the
Assessing Department. I would also like to express thanks
in particular for your help in my receiving the professional
designation or Certified Minnesota Assessor.
With this designation T was able to receive the position of
Savage City Assessor. As you know my C.k.?./\. term would have
run out on the 20th of January, 1981 ' so all in all the
transition has come at an opportune time [or myself and the
City of Shakopee.
Again I wish to thank the City of Shakopee and the friends I
have made while working here. You all have been very kind.
Sincerely,
/
'./ 1
'
�� �,^*�
/�`
C.W. "Johnnie" Johnson
CWJ:0lk �
• '
) /i.
An Equal Oppor Employer
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
Mayor and City Council
FROM: Judith S. Cox, Deputy City Clerk
RE: Garcia's Inn. Inc.
DATE: December 12, 1980
FOR YOUR INFORMATION . .
1. Application for On Sale Liquor License
I have received an application from Empire, Inc. (Tom Green) for
an On Sale Liquor License at 1145 Mn. Valley Mall. I have advertised
the application which was to have been considered by the Council on
December 2nd, but was not because the insurance and bond were not in
order.
I have recently learned that the correct corporate name is not Empire
Inc. and was advised by the City Attorney Mr. Coller that the Council
could not consider an application from a non - existent corporation.
Mr. Green has agreed to complete a new application and I will
readvertise under the appropriate corporate name for Council consideration
on January 6th.
2. Second Installment Payment Due
Under the City Code a new applicant for an On Sale Liquor License shall
pay the appropriate fee, prorated, with the pro rated share being not less
than one -half of the annual On sale liquor license fee. Mr. Green will be
making payment with his application.
Mr. Garcia, however, owes the City the second one -half payment on his
current license. Because he is selling his operation, he does not intend to
make this payment, and Mr. Green does not feel he should be required to
fulfill both requirements.
3. City Code Regarding License Fees
I am uncomfortable with the unwritten policy of allowing the license
fee to be paid in two installments. Not only is it in violation of the City
Code (which states that payment is considered a part of the application,
pp 115, Sec. 5.02, Subd. 4a), but it invites the current problem we have
with the Garcia license.
I would suggest that this be discussed sometime in the near future.
jc
" � City of Shakopee
•
S N K O p E t1 POLICE DEPARTMENT r r 14E s
476 South Gorman Street
) SHAKOPEE MINNESOTA 55379
`' ° _ E �. Tel 445 -6666 � � >< T
p O 1 `G a :r
\ 1 55379 ' }'
TO: John Anderson
FROM: Tom Brownell
DATE: December 9, 1980
SUBJECT: Liquor License Fee Payment
A problem regarding the payment of liquor license fees has
been brought to my attention during the course of a recent
applicant investigation.
A policy was adopted on May 8, 1979, whereby all licenses
issued for the first time require payment in full. The
renewal of a license could be paid in two equal install-
ments.
The policy can result in an attempt to conceal the true
owner of an establishment when the persons involved in the
transaction are either unwilling or unable to pay the second
installment of the fee.
I recommend the City Code be amended to require full payment
of the license fee when it is initially issued and for two
consecutive renewal periods allowing for two installment
payments upon the third renewal.
go GEWE JO gjZOEEet
•
157' Cr TY OF SIIAKO"E. R E V E N U E R E P O R T
AS OF 11 -30 -80 PAGE 1
of F12 1 GEN_RAL FIINf C U R R E N T M O N T H Y E A R TO D 4 T E f'
ACCOUNT /DESCRIPTION EST. REVENUE ACTUAL VAR IA ACE PCT EST. REVENUE ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT 1
3911 >EN. LEVY - CURP' NT h
.99 512,999.0' 222.751.51 290,244.49- 43.47.
;'' 3C12 SP .1 V - JUO+EMENTS .0? .03 9 i ,
3915 SP. l =VY - "ATCH"�IG FUND .07 .9) _.. .00 .1^ r
3917 iMC. INC. F. c PM . DF4. •0' .03 .00 . 00 �..,.
3929 DEL. PROPERTY TAXES .01 .''1
.00 89123.53 89123.58
302? rI: rISP4RTTIFF, .00 20,300.37 .. 12.853.04 7,]46.96- 64.3 :'1
( ,
.... TAv - S .4 :' • 532,999.00 243,731.13 289,267.87- 45.7 '• -
> -I
,..I
( 3111 I. IOU.7R LICENSES 50.00 36 9310 .01 22,755.00 13.54 5.1:1- 62.7 'I
3112 !EER I_TCF-t.+S_ '; .30 3,925.07 3,334.85 5.85 103.3
3113 'IIN';n R ^AM'l1INS LIC. •00 203.01 2 00.0^ .90 100.'
( 311 CIGA ". TTE LICENSES 12.03 101. 120.0^ 29.00 122.3
i 3115 t' f1U5IA�5s 1_ICEN IES .J^• 970.;'? 86 4 1.90- 95.5 ..1
313.) 0 8 G LICENSES 5.00 301.01 359.01 51.01 116.7 - 'I
( 3131 POOL rA it.E L ICENSE^ .00 .0) 100.00 100.99 ' t
3132 80TL.77'!G PERMITS 29799.00 40,000.01 44,502.85 4,502.85 111.3 . -I.
3 P1 U ":1 TrG PERt'T TS 2n
672.00 29 9000.11 21,641.50 1,641.5; 108.2 I
( 3134 M9CH. NTCAL PE'MT TS 1,285.00 109003.70 129957.45 2,857.45 128.6 ,,,
3135 WELL PERMITS 68.53 1`33.0'• 241.50 91.50 161.^
31.5. SEWER 7 , 'AA TrR PE'11tSTT^ 150.00 407.0) 19040.09 64'•.T') 260.
( 3137 ELECTRTCAL PERMITS 2,870.25 4,C00.03 11,334.40 7,394.43 282.6
3134 0TR=rT CPFN1N5 8 ER:11 rs 105.07 550.3) 19134.00 584.09 276.2 •
313' "I Sr. )•.1 -nVS. PERMITS .91 25 .(j) 09.09 24.12 1
( 3148 11TILITY T15. PER .)) • 93 • 1T •,)^
■
•••• LICENSES °. PER M[ 89016.75 116,750.0) - 1209990.55 . . .
492 103.6
r
3316 '+^RILE 1 4 459.0) 440.21 9.79- 97.9 .
3307 "n "E3TEC 41,P67.21 113,407.9'! 121,011.26 11,711.26 111 .7
> , 1'18 ).F.(. IRANI' - STAT .91 179559.0) 3,340.44 15,21: 9 .56 18.9
323+ CE TA-FED. 2A97 1,775. ^2 69823.7) 7.603.0 f. 793.45 111.5
331) FFO_itAl. GRAn)Ti • 0, . .00 .07
322" ST 5I- r.PANT3 .01 .10 .00 .31
3321 n8LIC' TRA IN ENG GRA•JT •^% 700.03 239.67 510.33- 35.2
•
3322 STAT PLAN611^ :0 9RA ^33 .00 1,077.12 1,916.37 916.11 191.6
332' CIVTL DLrENSo GRANT .0) 3,750.97 4,666.92- 8.416.12- 124.5
3230 1.7(1L 'ICI! T. AID .9' 392,032.03 264,024.07 88,098.17- 75.1 -�
1251 4ii1r8E') tiACI'. A•D 13,116.50 28,J39.)9 26.233.00 11767."^- 93.7
33s STIT'_ PN1. AIU .93 15,495.3) 139945.50 19545.51- 93.0
3333 STATE Hits. 901ST. ATn i
.07 .01 .00 .00 ...,.I
3334 POLtC= STATE 4T'T . 05,739.01 31,633.10 5,930.18 123.1
3243 C8U''fY R'IA0 b P'I119 4In .0) r-5 ,110.)! .11 65910 3 •9 8 -
3393 . TS- C111E? '-031. l.l' ?ITS .9:' . ^) .n^ •q^ • •
3'r 3 sow: nyn,l'. IN LI:IJ ",r irS 2 ^4 ^ 230,320.00 40 83.3
.... '_'l Ay1S ': 41'1 77039. '167.' 666,086.4? 201,894.6^- 76.7
3'37 •1nMI)J[SI14T1. V= cr -S 17,931.1 .)7 109700•..- . •
3.`7'1 I•!'). 9 EVE 91, :Intl' FE. 5,323. :, 1 ,531.')'. 139 6,09 .37 17 2.0
37 r rt. - . - tt t!G; ,,. r ^ • •i^ t
:7 l T R C 139, 3;1.0`: 38 0 .31 44,619.41- .7 ••I
• .51.•: Et''. ;F T 11
:n1 °.. 9.99 3.9 177.9 12 3.11- 59 . ; t
,
.••
. . ... . . -...
•
\
(
.„,... •.. 1 i00 C. I TY Or SH AK OP EE , _ _ . . , , REVENUE _ REPORT „ AS OF 11-30 -80 PAGE 2
I,)
( ' F LW! 51 GENERAL FUNC - C U R R ENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE
.' 1 1
ACC0UNTIDESCRI FT ION .EST. R E V E N U E . ACTUAL VARIAI‘CE . PCT EST. REVENUE . . .. ACTUAL . VAR LANCE .. PCT 1,
. r
: 3E11 PL AN CHECK FEE 931.45 11000.31 21,657.55 19,857.55 203.2 1;
3.E12 ASSESSMEhIT SEA RCPES 65.00 150 .00 246.00 96.0') 164.0 . h
....
3E13 SALE OF MAP'S 4.50 900.01 1,211.22 311.22 134.6 ;•.
( • 3E14 PLATS-PEZON-VA R-00NO.USE 50000 4,100.0) 21685.00 1,315.10- 67.1 !
• 1E15 SURVEY Cl!EC'e F EE 250.03 159.00 91.00- 63.6 CI
_ ... .
'• • ”.1 .c, rtums FEE •01 • .31 .0') .07
(.• '' 317 MIST'. PR)PET'. TY Pr_Nrat.-, • 500.00 31400.93 2,501.0) 89 73.6
3E14 STREET. REPAIR .03 1,501.31 19001.93- 2,501.93- 66.8
_ . _ . . . _ , .. . .. ... .._ _ . _ . _ . .. . . .
• ' 3.721 3901.4 REMOV AL .00 600.10 01.00 515.01- 13.5 ..71
C ' 3E21 PUGL IC ‘IORKS RPNI•41.5 .03 .03 .00 .0"
, ••".
• ' * 3E20 NEP° CUTTING CHARGEG .11 .3' 72.00- 72.00- j
...... . . _ . . .... _ . . . .. .... .
' 3E23 "I SC • 1 .S • SE R'T ICE9 73.46 431.93 595.12 1.05.12 148..8 !•''
3E24 SALE. OF 1 111101_1 NE .0) 0 ,300 .90 0,839.85 10339.05 123.9
•• I
A
3E2r, F !RIND RANGE 53 0.00 51 0•10
_ . . _ .. _ . _ _ _
... __._ __ _____ ..._.. .. . .. __... __. _ _ .. _ . ... .... ......._ ____ .. . , _
- : 3E27 Cr) NC.75 S I CM S - Fil 6 _ _ •00 5,200 .01 5,412.92 212.92 104.1 .
1 - 3E33 CeNCPSS IONS- MI .00 .00 .00 .01 ..
3E31 NI EC • POLICE SERVICES 300.01 .01 303.U- _ . . ... . . . . . _ . . ..... _ .. . .
3.'32 rown FE: i F11.' 07.00 910.11 054.00 354.99 170.0 ."
( *: 3E33 rr. CALLS 7, S 341\)0Y FEE 445.30 13,000 .1') 5,359.50 7,641.50- 41 •2 ..
.
3E34 FTP Nt.10 0 FEE G .11 .91 17.00 . 17.01
... ... . _ _.. ••• . . .... . - . __ • .... _ .. _ _ _ . _ . .
3E39 ACC IDEN T R'0' IS .39 200.33 280.86 81.86 141.4 .
..
3E45 SP AS TU.:ME rs-P19L • 31 11,300.01 12,109.01 RP 5.512 1.07.0
• 374 1 ArimISS 1•091- _ . ... .01 ...,,_ .. _. .. _ ..,5,3•3)•07 _. . 5,376.23 76.23 101.4
' 3742 34 IMMING LESS1N•z .0 5,560.01 5,440.20 59.89- 913.1
. .
' . 343 "t .C. rc11... IW"F .7') • .70 44.65 40.65
! ' 3619 COUNTY COURT P I9EG 1,544.00 29 9 033 •21 20 ,711.70 13,280.30- 71.4
. . ......_
.•
3131 G40.94nE C')LL. cFiARr..,E 89131.34 970300.13 70,117.69 ‘,. 19,682.31- 73.9 :
' : 3741 PP. TatruEe FE .01 20).01 .03 20
3F10 r9T•:REsr . .03 . 22,319.01 . _ _. .. .0') 22,001.07-
3F11 INIT1USTRY A GRE NT .01 .01 251.01 250.01 .•
3F2C 'AL :: OF CITY ° ROPERTv .31 .11 1,005.86 1.00 5.35
3F24 INVALID N3JECr •71 .01 63.65- 63.65- •-
_ _ . . - .... - . .-
3F3 PERMANENT 7 A 1 SFER3 121 1307.58 166,076.00 1219317.50 45,568.42- 72.7
• - 3E5 INVAL 10 •18JECT •97 .03 •00 •10 -•
FUND 5 7, 1 I:1P.0 11 S EMEN T ( 7, 124.83 .33 , 216.96- 20 6.56-
• * - 5 9 1 793. C1•117•13 ' ' : SE:71 . 3 ) .31 11249.80 1,24S.83
3E01 MISCLLANEONS 3,240.10 • 591)1.01 4,4)4.52 505.40- 89.9 ••
; •
• .. n
.. riiR , REVENUES . ES 141,58 f 131 16
i 45,376.01 314,301.i0 ...
7 c.3)- 71.5
• .
. .
PUNG 1 AL.: 226 ,836. 02 1196317.16.03 1,345.130.70 618959 7.22- 60.5 .'
• -
. ..
. ..
...
• '
'..
. .
• ,
i :
l U
•
1591 CITY OF SFI!1Vrf E _ E X P E _ N D I • T U,.R E , _ , .R E P O R T ,__ ., _,AS OF 11 -30-80 PAGE l
FLNn 01 GENERAL FUNC C U R R E N T M 0 N T H T E A 9 T O DA T E I"
ACC9tJ1Tin e pPROPRIATION ACTUAL VAR.IAACE,. PCT AP PROPRTATT ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT ! .,
•• 41::^ SALAPIES-FULL TINE 60,515.49 795,506.00 717,910.67 77,695.33 90.2 r
'1 4112 OVERTIME -FULL TINE. 558.16 13,100.0) ,4
1257.90 642.10 95.1
., 413^ SALAR IES - PART TIME 5,037.06 10),396.07 98,494.85 1,901.15 98.1 j°
4 112 SEVEP.AT\CE PAY .09 .01 .U� .09 j.
4140 PERA . • .. 3,169.74 66,495.0] .. 48,162.,52 18•332.48 72.4 ,_,
-` 4141 P- NSIONS -FICA 2,080.99 30.757.0) 24,819.85 5994 1.1'5 91.7 i.
-'' r r of n .00 n !
! Oir_ PENSIONS-FI C. 17.7R5.U•. 0 17,785.7
4 19? HEALTH R L IFE INSURANCE _ 2,313.85 3 27,4]4.52 11,625.49 77.2 IN
4151 1)01'[ IE?S COMP. INSURANCE .07 33,383.0) 33,393.00 .00 10C., i::,1
419? U9EMPLCYNENT COMP. 297.01 .01 335.66 335.6.-
•..• PERSONAL SERVICE: 74,662.30 1,0 962,864.97 133,587.33 87.9 •
4210 OFFICE SUP PLIES 197.65 4. . 6,410.97 1.510.97 -13".8 • -•!
I 4220 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,210.22 29,900.91 30,243.45 343.43 -101.1 :!
4221 Cr4EM1CA1; .00 3.100.90 1,436.30 19663.70 46.3
' 422? MOTOR FUELS ? LUERTCANTS 9,277.74 54 9850•1) , 49,914.63 _ 5,935.37 89.2 - -
4223 CLr'711ING- PE.RS•EOUTPMENT 53.90 5,000.01 3,892.16 1,107.84 77.9 ':
4224 SAFETY SUPPLFS .03 1,500 391.27 1,108.73 26.1
' 4221 SMALL T1?OL PURCHASES 68.55 2,500.0) 964.61 1•535.39 39.6 - •
42S? _DU[P.1'AINT.•P. REPAI° 1,547.49 23.559.97 27,630.53 4.080.93 -111.3 .
4211 9Ln';• tin PIT i P. PAIR 555.90 15,150.0) 14,035.33 1.114.67 92.6
4232. VEHICLE "A TNT• 0 ., REP AI° 1,773.77 21.340.00 17,655.44 3,684.56 82.1 •
. _ . .
4233 COMM. SYSTEM MAlNT. .00 5,725.79 4,555.42 1,169.59 79.6
■ 4234 UTTL.SYSTEM MAINT. R. CON 123.92 3,509.01 149.68 3,357.32 4 .3
4240 1080 MATERIAL; 1,869.10 _ 5.5.7.9) 6,576.74 190 76.74 -11 •
. 4241 PATCJ'IN.: MATER ILLS 1,789.30 7,000.0) 7,744.89 744.99 - 110.6 ,..
4242 SEAL GA 489533.91 .5,.300.9' 50,717.67 14,26'.33 79.'1
1243 6ROU'J5S 'MINT. MATER .00 2.660.)) 1,994.39 .1,565.61 41.1 ••
4244 ICE C1NTROT MATERIALS 2,672.49 6.275.0) 39909.57 2,365.43 42.3
4250 STGN,3 °STi[IPI MATERIALS 134.00 5,533.03 5,872.79 392.78 -107.1
4291 ST8 II' Ihr, MTL 1. .U' 1,200.0' .00 1.209.0'
• ••• SUPPLIE.S 0 . OE 72,807.62 2,4 9190.31 2329215.83 31,934.17 97.9 •
.I
A :1'; L7r,1L SERVICE; 2,552.17 30,010.]) 35,900.94 51909.91- 119.7
4711 AUnTT 4 rIN. SERVICE ; .0) 6,030.00 .90 6,0'0.00
4212 ENGINEERING S:RVTCES 42.0G 11,505.1) 9,828.39 1,676.61 95.4 '
4, EOM 0001. ;N Z 3CFT11AR' .03 .69 .30 .0'
4214 PLANNING .3? 5, 023.0] .0" 5.007.0?
4715 nrI cT PP. (IF . sr. 91r EC 8,943.04 52,927.91 54,939.81 2,01 -101.9
i
•• +• P90F= SSIOFJIL SERUTES 11,437.21 105, 107.669.14 4,762.8 95.5
■ 4' Pr!STA9 ' 513.70 3.615.7' ' 3.726.02 111.12 -103.1
4 )21 TEIEPW. "NE 573.46 13,)20.7' 9,744.12 4,275.8 67.?
, ' 422:' DELIVERY SE.'DVICE .;1 .1^ •00 •' '
�1' . •.•• r)M'4Ui•J ICAT I'7`:: 1,287.'_x. 15, 3=7.0] 12..47 .14 4.154.90, 75.; ;
4 33? TRAVEL _(E'E'LS;. 556.44 6, 0.)1 5.189.88 9 61.12 84.4 ,
' • • +•• TRAri.L 586.44 • F „150.';' 5.1 "8.81 961.12 (14.4 I'
...-
• . . . _ . _. ____ - -- . ... . . .....- . _. .. -
. ,
, \
•
1931 •C-T I T 1F 314 AY OPE': EX P TUR_E E RE T AS OF PA0E _2_ .J
... _ . . . ... .._ ... _ .. ..... _ ._.
( F um )1 1 Cte-JVAL F win C U R R ENT PI O N T 41 YEAR TO OATE r
il
Acr.ouNrio7.scRrPr torsi APPROPRIATION ACTUAL VAR1AKE PCT ApPROPIIIATI 11N A CTUAI VAR TANCE "CT ,
. !-■
., .
1350 LF(.341.. Nr.)110ES Puilt_v;Htw; 929.11 12,300.01 9,593.47 2,706.53 73.0
. .: 1351 F TN T INC: P. REP R9CUCT ION _ 62.52 _ _ 5,125.01 49824.47 300.53 94.1 ,,••
r 1
.... ._ . . _ ........... ... ...
61 " PRINTING R 1EPROOUCT 987.66 17,425.0J 14,417.94 3,00 7.06 82.7
...,
. . - . . - . .
4360 F.N. 9 . L IA1. I NSURANU: . • 5 87.00- 16,580.0-3 38,357.31 1.1777.51-31.3 '1
✓ .
4361. ENI1P • 3, 90 I L ER I NSUR ANCE .01 9,051.11 826.35 8,223.65 9.1
4262 VE.PTCLE R, EITUIP• INS. 312.0 - 12,180.00 118.01 12,062.00 1.0 '7.1
.. . . . . _.. .._. ... ...... ..
(
... * INT.)? 1 NCr. 899.00- 37,110.09 39,311.66 1,491.66-103.9 .,
. ... . • - • .... . , __ ... . . _ .. _ _ . _ _ _ . ... .. _ _
4 371 FLEC. TR !CITY - 1 t650.11 - 22050.03 21,136.20 1,413.80
4 37j mA TUR AL GAS '. HTG 265.38 16,940.11 9,328.67 7,611.33 55.1
4 372 ' .01 1,625.03 - .31 1,625.01 ..
•
4 GA R1 • 0 ISPOSA If DUMP C1-10; • • 8,368•6 131275.03 82,442.52 15,832.48 83.9
• : . 42-3 ( AND RENTAL .01 1,400.03 .01 1,400.01
• 1311 PULL') NG RENTAL .0) 300.00 .00 301.11
.... .
• 4 282 MACHINERY ilcr Al, 762.05 • • • 5,309.09 • • 5,738.98 438.08-ion.3 ,-
4 313 OFFICE EOUIPr NT RENTAL L 494.41 81700.90 7,459.01 1,240.99 15.7
1311 EDP EOUTP1% NI flr VIAL - 846.05 19,000.01 17,139.47 19161.53 10.2
._ .. - - - - -- - • .
- • - • - -
" UTP_ITIES R 9:7NTALS 12.386.82 174,190.'3) 143,244.85 30 ,845.15 32.3 .
. . _. . . ... . . .
• 1
4 7.9 ..? r "MFErtr NCr- S 't SC . . I-IrLS 627.77 ii,4S.i 12,511.13 1,111.12 96.6
4211 t)UrS 4 SU: Sf" cl FT IOW: .03 5,723.09 5,419.71 303.31 94.7 ..
4 212 1 ICE•13rS . . 16.00 125.03 133.00 58.11-146.4 •
.
4 31 nnOKS P. PA ic'1 41.40 - - i. 03]...di - 1,285.04 955.96 64.9 .
4216 mEr:T190 EXPE.NSE 22.11 996.23 619.83 376.29 62.2
. _. . . . .. . . _ . . . .
• I.,* CrINF SCHOOL 03 01K0 707.98 23 9121.1) 20,'13.72 3,114.28 96.5
4411 J4kt ron IAL SEP. VICES .01 1,130.01 875.81 124.12 87.r, ,
4 411 CURR• i USE CH 490E •d• 1, - .03 1,500.31
•
.
443 RL119 TESTS 46.33 400.0) 439.22 5.22-101.3
. 4119 TNVAL Tr) ORJ7CT-F .3') . 100 . • .00 1,511.00 .,
4491 v' 1 SCCLIA 19.19 31125.•13 1,44 7.94 1,57 7.06 • 47• )
i•.! .
k rrttsoN 41481 4,11NIT0 65.00 7,425.0) 2,729.04 4,695.96 36• 9
4 E.17 PURCilASE OF 14I) .0 .5) •
• • ' 1.7.01 ISL0',3• R S TRUC TURES . . • e. .n, .90 .00
4F.09 CAPI TA 1-01 .3) .i.!? .o0 .0) -:
.-,
4E13 CAP) T A L - VEFT CLE0 .3' 104,113.0) 19,215.55 15167 7.43 85.1
• . 4.!].1 r.AP1 TAL-r(11.11P1F. 1 7.316• 32 37 9255.1) 3 2,169.23-105.8
- .I
4E12 [API TA L-LIFF ICE '=_CUIPNENT 151.01 12 9311.0) 11,775.02 53.3•98 95.6
4 1.9 OTHER 1 PPR OVFME'l TS .02 .1' 347.58 341.5V-
. ..
. • a• • CAFri AI ". 1111 179466.32 154 9453.03 141,762•31 13,696.7r 91.1
,.,.
; •
4(1.1 IN TER:: 31 PaY1
71•1 prpm!t:‘;71'.:T 1- ER0 •01 . .30
2,4 30.3
36 ,550. ! i 50.3 3 29410.00
30 ,5 .10 100.0
4 T3413
69.30...!) 83.6 .11
•I
,.!
. 4W •!,'' Pr.2 IS f.: TOR r;'7!;•`. .1,.3 t,:.:0.5' 2 $131•13 ' 531.10-133.2 1.1
A
C TY OF SHAKOP EE E X P E_N.D I T U R E, R P 0 R T_ _ AS OF 11-30—no . PAriE ,3
• . FU I 11 GENERAL 'FUND CURR ENT MONT 11 YEA R TO DA T E
!' ACCIUN T/OFSCRI PT ION APPROPRIATION ACTUAL .. VAR IA PCT , APPROPRIATION ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT
. .
4910 REFUNDS •03 •00 105.34 .105.34—
4 V31 SALES TAX .00 .00 111173.5T 1917 3.57—
__..... , .
4'182 TA YES _ •01 •11 40.33 4 3.33— i°
4 S03 INVe.LT 0 IHJECT •30 •03 .00 •0C
L. 411 C"kT INGENCY 20.000.00 1 1 18.145.60 9.3
_ . . .
t ' *••• OTHER rKPFNDITURES .00 60,550.0) 38,255.44 22,2°4.56 63.2
FUND T CT ALS 191,295.51 19963,706.31 1.71 2 .133•91 2519572.1,9 87.2
_ .
. . . . . . . _
. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
. •
•
. .
I
� ~ . .
.
(. 1 --------- -- ---------- ------ -----__-_--
'
[ ci TY OF SH AK OP EE REVENUE �-=-� PAGE
(
T')
^
ENT MONTH .^.. TO ~..E •
|' . ACcnownDcScRIPT ION
| REVENUE ---'--- ACTUAL ------ VARIANCE PCT EST. REVENUE
---- ACTUAL ^^^`� VARIANCE `=�---
. ---^'--'-- -'_.- -'.'.'.- '.-
.' .~ .00
, ' . 3015 SP. .LEVY "x.cn/n° FUND .00. ' .00 .00
( 3017 INC. �wc. IND. » c nrx o cx � . . ' . no ~o' •nn .00 Po
it I
3020 �DEL. PROPERTY TAXES �:» ' ~- 1123.58 6,876.427_54•2__
' 30e2 FISCAL uIopvn�.nco 12,853.04 2 --- o_0 ----- I § o,u5 o .5* -- ' - ' .z
o 46.n a - m� -
� '/ • .'
r.
', . * TAXES z31082.70 ,999. .13 365,81
' 3111 LIpuox LICENSES 200.03 zuimiii .nl 22.705.00 13"595.00- 62.5 lin
'i z112 BEER /'IcENSES ~y� o
`i 3113 3,y34.85 9.85 100.3
• 3113 nrwoo & nxnnL I NG �IC -- --' ---------------- -
, .00 200.00 .00 100.0 -"`|
: /' 3114 CIGARE TTE LICENSES .00 ' 100 •01 m 108.0 x.on 8.00 o.o
p 3115 MISC. xoozwc LICENSES .00 yon.o� 860.00 40.00- 95.6
/ 3130 DOG LtcENSES '-- ,~
�� 11..00 . noo.ov 345,00 45.00 115.0 - ]"
/ 3o1 POOL ronLc L IccwScs .00 1_0O 100.00 60 0.00- 14.3 /"
�
3 13 BUILDING PERMITS � opug.no 40,000.00 �
no �l�rv�~o� �,rnn.y� 104.3 i=
`' 3133 PLUMB/Ns pcn°/ro 1 , 538.00 ------------------------ 201000.00 ----- 201969-50 ----- 96 9.50 m4.o 7 �
( "' xo^ MECHANICAL PERMITS 916 .05 10.000.00 z1 srx +5 1157 "
'� 3135 WELL PERMITS 22.00 �snoo "�rn^oo " 23.00 o 115.7 ��
' . . "." 115.3 I
3136 SEuEh& WAiEKPERMITS ------------- ------ ---'---------- - - '
` "o 890•00
(
�'
3137 cLscrxrcxL PER NITS 473.25 *.00u.no 8,434.15 '4.434.15 210.9
'' 313n STREET �opcwI��ERMIIS -_-_----' 145.50 550.00 *r9.00 18I.1
u
,, MI ^c. ow-BUS. PERMITS 5.00 25.01 §vjin 29.00 196.0
/ ' 3140 orzLzr, INS. PERMI TS .00 ,no .00 .0"
|, '
|~' �~
' i`.: ^^°^ �iet� �����i
t ------------- ����
'----�. ------ --
-- ' - Il6;7�0'00 - ---- �i��9f3.80 -- ' �,�Y����� 9��2 -1,,,
| -: � ��
{''. 3206 wnnILE.x"oc __ __________ __ __ ____ y��,�� ,np ��o,o�- �
'i 32)7 vopcsrco .00 ---- '' --- ' - I����no�o� - ' - f��i��.�n � o.�.§ n - i1.5
( [ / 3203 ••• GRANT - STATE .03 18,550.03 3,340.44 15.20 9.56- 18.0 '' 37o9 Ccrx-pco• GRAN/ .o: 6,820.00 s.azo.o^ 991.96- 05.5
3210 FEDERAL GRANTS -'-----'--------- ---- -0) ------ -- .00 - - .00
( 3220 STATE GRANTS .00 .no .on .00 ' rol
l'H 3222 STATE _ 37.21 POLICE �7xAlnING GRANT - _____-_' ---� .03 1800..03 i�23?~67 51 0.33- 19136.2
( 3223 CIVIL DEFENSE GR ANT .03 3,750,03 4,666.92- 8,41 6.92-124.5
rro
3230 LOCAL GOVT. «/D L .0) 3 52.0 32.01 264 1024.00 88,00 8.00- 75.0
3231 xiTAcHcn MACH. ^lD ---- --- ---- ---- ' - 28,000.03 --- lj.il6.50 -- ' 14,88 3.50- 46.3 -
' 3:32 STATE HWY. w^Iyr. x Io .00 15.495.03 1 3,945.50 1154 9.50- 90.0
l'''
3 m *uY,_r�sr AID `«
3 223334 POLICE nrc umrc o x/o -- '- ' ' 3l,�i .00 0.18 --- - - - _ . --��,���..»� �i ' �i,�5�.i o ��§jh ��oi�].l - '
3240 COUNTY ROAD x evIncc vIn • .00 65.000.01 .00 as'noo.00- k1
n:nx GRANTS-OTHER vox r, UNITS .00 .0) .00 .00 >"
3260 �
o upuc�vpi,�w �tc� �r �xi '- � u - -' eio;t1 - lii - d:ab.hti gd.u.).Dd 'i -
`
I :• ^^^^ GRANTS n A Ios o�,oaz.m uar°�u�.n3 588,855.46 �rr,�on.�^- 67.8 '
�| .. .
�� 3E07 xny�w�xmxr�vs rccs .o� m.onn.no .00 10900 0.00-
3E08 {wn•xcucmyE �oon FEE z.000.nc 7^xoo.no o,noo.on 1,Voo.00 113.3 In
1, : c�c�xc�x/y� �b��cc� - ,0x - - '- ��,Ono �� �o� �� . ' 44,619.41- - -'�---.
' ,/ . . .
°' s~n cmn. GRADE FEE 3'1.00 mn on `ao o� ,�� oo �n �
\.' ' ^ ^ �z^ o- . '
, . . ' ' _ - �y
.
. •
.. (
1...o -
.. P
180 CITY OF SHAKOPEE REVENUE R E P O R T AS OF 10-31-80 PAGE 2
11
( 2 FUND 01 GENERAL FUND . C U R R ENT MONTH " YEAR 7 0 DATE
3 ACC OUN T 1 DE SCR I PT TO N EST: REVENUE ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT ES T. REVENUE ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT :4
1 5 3.7.11 PL AN CHECK FEE .00 11800.0) 204726.10 18,926.10 151.5 I
.7
" 37.12 A SSFSSPENT SEA RCHES 68.00 150.00 181.00 31.00 120.7 -11
' 1 393 SALE OF MAPS 33.85 - 90000 1420 6.72 306.72 134.1 F1
.
( 5 I 37:14 PL ATS-REZON-VA R-COND.USE 277.00 ' ' - 440 00.10 2,635.00 1, 365.0o- 65.9 Ile
ot
. VI 37.15 SURVEY CHECK FEE ,.., • . 2t. 00 250.00 150.00 10 0.00- 60.0 Itz
---.--.-- - - -- -- - - - ... ---...
III 396 FILING FEE .00 .03 .00 .00 ;3
1 1.1
37.17 MISC. PROPERTY RENTALS 400.00 3000.00 2,001.0') 1,399.00- 58.9
114
'''j 39.9 STREET REPA IR 30.00 1,500.0') 1 000 1.93- 2.50 1.93- 66•8
3.".20 SNCW REMOVAL .00 . ' . 600.00 81.00 519.00- 13.5 Ii7
37.21 PUBLIC WORKS R .
.00 .01 .00 .00 lin
•Il 37_22 WEED CUT TI NG CHA RGES .00 .03 72.00- 7 2.00-
' 3'.23 MI SC.PB.WK S• SERV ICES 280.41 400.03 521.66 121.66 130.4 '3t
i' "I 3E24 SALE OF GASOLINE 1,966.10 8,000.00 9,83 9.85 1,8 39.85 123.0 :.1..2
3.7.26 FIRING RANGE 100.00 .00 500.00 500.00 ;211
17
r. 1 3.!27 CONCESSIONS-POOL .00 5200.00 5,41 2.92 212.92 104.1
37_30 CONCESSIONS-MISC .00 - • - . 00 . 00 15 0.00-
I . .1
34:31 M I SC. POLI CE S ER VICES .00 300.00 .00 30 n.00-
. 1-"I
332 POUND FEES A. FINES 57.00 500.00 767.00 267. 153.4 11
37.33 F T R E CALLS & S TA NDBY FEE 1,015.00 13,000.00 4 9 91 4 .50 8,085.50- 37.8
I
I
1"I 3734 F IRE NUMBER FEES .00 .00 17.00 1 7.00
hi 37.35 ACCIDENT REPORTS . 44•00 200.00 280.86 80.86 140.4
340 SEASON TICKETS-POOL .09 . 11000.03 1 24189.00 88 9.00 107.9
-1-1
3'41 ADMISS ICNS -POOL .00 5,300.00 5,376.23 7 6.23 101.4 1-1
. 1 1
. 1'1 3.'42 SWIMMING LESSONS .00 59500.00 5,440.20 59.80- 98.9
i--I
343 MISC. POOL INCOME .00 .01 44.65 44.65
- 1- 3C-13 COUNTY COURT F INES 2 9286• 83 29 ,000.00 19,167.70 9,8 32•30- 66•1 !-,
...
r! 3731 GARBAGE COLL • CHARGES 15 ,978.10 . 97,800.00 69,927.35 27,872.65- 71.5 '411
3741 RETAINED FEES .00 • 200.0) .00 200.00-
3F10 INTEREST .00 22 t000 .09 .00 22,000.00- . ,... ,
I 'I 3E12 INDUSTRY AGREE PENT 250.00 •00 250.00 0.1)0 t o-1
. ,,.
3F20 SALE OF CI TY PROPERTY .00 .00 1,005.86 1,00 5.86 ...-,
I ..•'
3F24 T NVAL I D OBJECT •01 .00 6 3.65- 6 3.65- ‘..,
. . . _ ... ..
I ' 3E30 PERMANENT TRANSFERS ------------ - • 00 1661876.0) .00 166,876.00-
3F53 INVALID OBJECT
I I • • 01 .00 .00 .00
3'350 REFUNDS . REIMBURSEMENTS 220• 03- .0) 331.36- 331.36-
I..1 - .. - •
r i 37.51 INS. CLAIMS & SETTLEMENT .00 .00 1.24 9.80 1,249.80 4
1
■.,'
' 1 I
3'.91 MISCELLANEOUS 82.117 5,000.0') 1,246.52 3,7 24.9
- . _ .--- - ---____ - _ . -
i" . "*• OTHER REVENUES ' 23 1715•13 • -. 392,224.59 172,71 1.57 273,414.43-
I 1
. LA FUND TOTALS . 95,258.41 1,963,706.00 19118.271.96 9220331.04- 54.R r.•
. 1
,
. -.. -
.. - . - - .. - _ ..-. . . .. _
- rnI
.4-..
en
,e :
Liji Po,
.:,
i
1. A
.
. . , . . . .. . .
.. .. •
; 1
•
180 CITY OF SHAKOPEE E X P E N D I T U R E REP OR 7 AS OF 10-31-80 PAGE 1
( I: FLND 01 GENERAL FUND CURR ENT MONTH YEAR T 0 DATE
• I
1 3
OCCOUNT/DESCRIPT ION A PPROP RI ATI ON ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT APPROPRIATI ON ACTUAL VARIANCE PC T
-`1
1 100 SALARIES-FULL TIME 660912.14 795,506.03 657,295.18 138,210.82 82.6 n
4 112 OVERTIME-FULL TIME 719.34 13,103.00 11,899.74 1,200.26 90.8 ,
7 1 4 130 SALARIES - PART TIME 13,014.93 • 100 1396.03 93,457.79 6,938.21 93.1 9
.
( ' 11 1 132 SEVERANCE PAY ...00 .00 .00 .00 l,0
-,:
L 4 WI PERA 4 9325.51 664495.03. 441292.78 22,202.22 66 6
.---- -J
: 'CI 4 141 PENSIONS-FICA 2,414.83 • 30 057.03. 221734.86 81022.14 73.9 '13
( • H 4 142 PENSIONS-FIRE .00 17,785.00 .00 17,785.00 1..
; 1, 1 4150 HEALTH a LIFE INSURANCE 2,513.22 39,030 .00 25.090.67 13,939.33 64.3 1G
4
4151 WORKMENS COMP• INSURANCE •00 33083.01 3 3.00 .00 100.0 v7
' .,. 9 152 UNEMPLOYMENT COMP • 00 .03. 48.65 48.65- , IA
:I 0
,
,........_
"k* PERSONAL SERVICES 89,899.97 110 96,452.00 8889202.67 208,24 9.33 81.0 '21
. 1
■ i . i 1:7,
" 4 210 OFFICE SUPPLIES 474.84 4 9900 •03 6,213.32 11313.32-126•8
_ - --- - --.....-..... .. . - - --.-----------._---- _-- - - -_- ._
1220 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,681.33 290900.00 26,033:23 3,866•77 87.1 '.7.
.
4 221 CHEMICALS 00 39100.00 1,436.30 19663.70 46.3
I07
2..: 4222 MOTOR FUELS & LURR IC ANTS 1,686.71 54 1850.03 39,636.89 15,213.11 72.3
4 223 CLOTHING-PERS.EOiiii3MENi .00 . l'igi.4 i6.6
4 224 SAFETY SUPPLIES .01 1,500.00 391.27 1,108.73 26.1
131
•.,! 4 225 SMALL TOOL PURCHASES 212.40 2,500.03 896.06 1,603.94 35.8 _07
4230 EQUIP. PAINT• & REPAIR 71333.23 , 27,150.00 26,083.05 1,066.95 96.1
( .•:•: 4231 DLCG•MAINT & -REPAIR 1,718.11 15,150.01 13,479.53 1,670.47 89.0 !•:"
'": 4232 VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIR 2,181.92 21,340.00 15,881.67 5,458.33 74.4
IT;
4 1 4233 COMM. SYSTEM MAINT. 110.20 5,725.00 49555.42 1,169.58 79.6
( , 4234 UT TL .SYSTEM MAINT. & CON .00 3,500.03 25.86 3,474.14 .7 10
0 4240 ROAD MATERIALS 13.50 5,500.03 4,707.64 792.36 85.6
.. . ___ _ _._....___ ___________
V"; 4241 PA TCH I NG MATERIALS 1,481.65 7,0156.00 3,955;59 1,044.41 ' 85•1 ---- r"
( 1 4 242 SEAL COATING .00 • 65,000 .00 2,183.86 62,816.14 3.4
,''' 4 243 GROUNDS MAINT. MATERIALS 740.60 2,660 .0) 1,09 4.39 1,565.61 11.1
-
4 244 ICE CONTROL PIA TERI ALS 136.46 6 02i5 .03 1,237.09 t,d iii.T ;..•
( I 1 4 210 S T GNS& STRI PI AG MATERIALS 2 ,302• 13 5,500.00 5,758.78 258.78-104.7
I• 4 251 STRIP I NG MILS. • 00 1,200.00 .00 1,200.00 .17
Ld
pl
".• SUPPLIES & REPAIRS 22 0733.08 267,750.00 1591498.21 108,341.79
..:,
:1
17.P1
- '.■I 1210 LEGAL SERVICES 3,661.07 30 0000.03 33,348.77 3,34 8.77-111•2 In,
0,1
'"1 4U AUDIT 1 FIN. SERVICES .00 ,00O.03 .00 6,00 0.00
.,--.
," 4 '11 ENGINEERING SERVICES
1 . - 2,744.47 11,505.00 9,786.39 1,718.61 85.1
4 '1 4213 EDP DESIGN & SOFTUARE .00 .00 .0C .00 r
( 4 .^, 4214 PLANNING .01 5,000.03 .00 5,000.00 ,n
I"
; .'•, _ 4215 OTHER PROF. SERVICES 7,423.32 52 1927.00 46,096.77 6.830.23 87.1
: . 1.,:,. -_ ___ ..... . _ . .. • .... _ .
r..
•••• PROFESSIONAL SERVIES 13,828.86 105,432.03 89,231.93 16,200.07 84.6 ■.'D
i
.....,
420 POSTAGE 20., 5 3 0615•00 3,212.32 402.68 83.9
•
.
4 221 TELEPHONE fIRT• 13 13 v020.00 8,170.66 4 ,84 9.34 62.8 i
1
4 222 DELIVERY SERVICE _ •01 .00 .00 .00
. _
....
1 1
I :n (...)", •4** COMMUNICATIONS 937.69 16,635.03 11,382.98 5,252.02 68.4
_ _
423J TRAVEL EXPENSE 6 TT .Rd - " . ' . 6 ,iS0 .Oi . ii,.eiii i,ii i.. iii.6 . -
r ' .• ,
71 1
■..1 i■•• TRAVEL . 677.80 6.150 .01 4,602.44 1,54 7.56 748 _ 1*
. . -
K
■ ,
...
( r - ............
- --,
:, ...,
1. ....
\'' ISIS° CITY OF SHAKOPEE E•XPENDITURE REPORT AS OF 10-31-80 PAGE 2 _1
ri
( 12 FIND 01 GENERAL FUND ,. CURRENT MONTH . .
T E A R TO DATE
a
3 . .. . ACC 0 UN j / 0 E SC RIP LI 0N___.. A e?R0F5 I A TT ON ACTUA1. _.• VARIANCE PCT APPROPRIATION ACTUAL ... VAR IANCEPCT
ri
' 4 250 LEGAL NOTICES PUBL. /SHING 783.83 12,300.0) 8,668.33 3,631.67 70.5 •
4351 PR TNT r NG & REP RODUCT ION 3,525.71 5,125.00 4,761.95 363.05 92.9 1
7
-1-
. .
ro
it el •••• PRINTING A REPAODUCT 1 009154 17,425.00. / 31436.28 3,994.72 77.1
it . . . .....
...na GEN. & 1146. INSURANCE 56 1;580.63 38,9 22,3641.31-234.9
4 261 POOP. & BOILER INSURANCE .00 9:050.00 826.35 8,223.65 9.1
I -
I'l '1. 4262 VEHICLE A EQUIP. INS. 191.00 12,130.01 430.00 119750.00 3.5
117
i
•in
1 "v •se INSURANCE .
• 191• 0) . .
37,810.00 40,200.66 2,390.66-106.3
po
/ ..(i
4270 ELECTRICITY 2,611.22 22.550.09 19,436.02 31063.98 86.4
4271 NATURAL GAS A HT G 185.01 16,940.00 9,063.29 7,876.71 53.5
,
11625.00 .00 1,625.00
: 11 4273 GARD•DISPOSALf DUMP CHGS. , 8,339.33 .. - : 989275.03. 74,073.83 24,201.17 75.4 i..:-.
4280 LAND RENTAL • 00 • , • . 1,400.0) .00 1,400.00 !rn
! 1 " 4281 BUILDING RENTAL .
''.011 ' ! • .
' 300.00 .00 • 300.00 Ira
I -,•
1: '1 4282 MACHINERY RENTAL 393.34 5,300.01 4,976.93 323.07 93.9
l''
q353 OFFICE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 741.21 8,700.00 6,964.54 1,735.46 80.1 In-
!.
H 9 EDP EQUIPMENT RENTAL 2 t208•66 191000.00 16,293.42 2,706.58 85.11 1:;;
I•'
. • i
1 •""! * 4 • • U T I L I T I E S & RENTALS
14478.77
.
• 174 ,0 90.00 . 130,858.03 43,231.97 75.2
, 11,1 4290 CONFERENCES A SCHOOLS 307.25 14 ,453.03 11,883.41 2/569.59 82•2 1_:'
■ 1- 4 291 DUES & SUEISC RI FT TONc 29.80 5,723.00 5,419.70 303.30 94.7 .
• 1 . , 4 292 L I CE N S ES. _____ _ _ 52 • 00 _ ___ _ _ ___ ___ 125 . 00 ____ 167.00 42.00-133.6
l•'!
43q4 Fldbk & PAMPHLET 2 18.20 1,831.00 T;2Tii.g4 0. ' ----- k.
.
4 296 MEETING EXPENSE 11.00 996.00 596.99 399.01 59.9
, .
r : . '•• coi4F , SC HOOLSO3OOKS 618.25 23,128.00 19130 5.74 3,822.26 83.5 0 1
Inn
1
:.,.
(', 4 Ate JA NT TOR TAL SERVICES •09 1,000.0) 875.88 124.12 87.6
' lirj
4411 CURRENT USE CHARGES .00 11500.00 .00 1,500.00
4 425 noon TESTS 60.00 400.00 359.22 40.711 89.8
4 498 INVALID PDJECT-F .30 .
1,500.00 .00 11500.00
4 499 MISCECLA ---- ---- .------- ---- ----- ------------------ - ------- - - --- i., , iii.iiii - --- i*,§6.1 - i, ii -
I :I.
i I
r- .... PRISON BOARD A.JANITO 60.00 . 71425.03 2,664.04 4,760.96 • 35.9 .11
_ ....___. _. ..
,..,..
;•!!. 4 !.07 PURCHASE OF LA NU .00 .09 .00 .00
408 81_0GS• & STRUC TURES _ .00 .00 .00 • • •00 .,
_ .
'''I 4 F.09. CAPI T A L-OTHER .0) .01 .00 .00
. 1 .. 7 4510 CAPITAL - VEPI CLES .01 104 093.03 89,215.55 151677.45 85.1
491 CAPITAL-EQUIPMENT 6,346.40 379255.0) 22,10 7.91 15,147.09 59.3
_ .. ... ... .. . . ... . _ ....... . ....... .. __ ..,___ . .
1 492 is:A rt i L-61=Fict f:C1116HEi4T 476.25 - - - .12 '311.00 - - 11,625.62 685.8 . 9 - 4... - 0
1 419 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS .31 .03 347.50 347.50- !•-.:
P .
.r.n
••••• CAPITAL ?.. Iiirlaiiiqiis • G ci - - - - - - 154 1459.01 1239295A8 . 3 79.6
L C■Jj
4E11 INTEREST PAYMENTS .0:1 2,400.03 20)0.00 .00 100.0 72
rt .--- VI. 5 t ii Tri4iIF Eiig * - * ------- - .* - . *3* :' a*: cid - -- - -- - - - - • • - - * - - , i .66 - i3.50.,66 • 4,666.65 ii.:g
. 1”6 449 MERCHANCISE FOR RESALE .0'3 1,600.03 2,131.8' 531.80
:".1 ... ....... ... . _ . .
. . - .. 19
''', ~'.
.
( '_---_.—____ __-_____ ____-__
.
`( .
:
1 5x0 r TY OF SHAKOPEE EXPEN « lASnF10 PAGE 3
(. `| pLvo o1 GENERAL FUND c o n R c m r w o m T n ` � r E x R TO o k r E )
�
' ACCOUNT/DE �
xcx��InN � I
_ ��������ION _ ______AcT�L______V��IA �5E_ PCT « _' --' - 1.1
.l. ` *Vtn urronnn 10. 89 .00 10 5.34 10 5.34- n
"/ 4�x1 SALES `^�� .ny oo z zrz xr� �r `
^ `i- 4 �o2 fAxss - -' -'- '-'-- '-------'-----------'-- �� z ��� ---' ~ - �
`� ^i 4 spn IwvvL/o npJccr 40• 33
� ` � _ ~oo ^o. ��~��� ��
j 4 9 1 co _____ , '' _______ ~«� _�� 4~«» ____ 1 u ,1 ^. 5 _ `»« ___ 9 . 3 ___ ! �
'( '� OTHER EXPENDITURES � '"
! ^^^^ zo"ooz zz 60 9550.00 zn z�o *�
� , "",^"` ^" 63.2
' .
|l ����__________ ______
. ,� r m
1
• 1"I __---- liol
/
1.1 _ _ � _
^
.
( �!
_'--_
� ..
�
�
^'� .
� .,,o, --' ----- ---- -'- '--'----- ---'----''------ „.1
•
• - -- ---- --____-__--'____'__--_._-__--__-__- ___-__--'__-_--__'-_--____-___
( \ • . 7
-- '�_- y`
s ---'_-_---____-____-__
;4•N
_-_
!
i | (0
-- '--- --_ -
� 411 p11!
^� ------'------`-------------'--'-'----' -------------'------------------------'�------'----�-------- ---------'--- ------
•
�
,/ � � - -
. _ -- --_ --- � -- � ' - .. - -
xi
VII
— .. ' ' .-- . . ' . _
') ' .— ............ _ .- .. .. . -- ' — — — — . — — '
—_— • — '—_ — '' —' . —
� —'
"J
— — —' . . . - -- — ' ' - ' - -�-_-
• i
•
.?...1. I" •
PROBE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.
1000 E. 146th Street
Burnsville, Minnesota 55337
November.26, 1980 DEC 1 1 1980
CITY OF SHAKoPEk
•
City of Shakopee
129 First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
INVOICE NO. 080 - 011 -224 - Weinandt Acres 1st Addition
(Street Construction Project)
Previous Balance:
Total of Invoice No. 080 - 010 -197 $7,747.43
Work This Period:
Bluetops for gravel, reset bluetops for
29th Avenue, write legal description
for Borrow Avenue.
Engineer: 3.0 hrs. @ $37.00 /hr, $111.00
Technician: 2.0 hrs. @ $22.00 /hr. 44.00
2 Man Crew: 20.0 hrs. @ $44.00 /hr. 880.00
TOTAL THIS PERIOD $1,035.00
TOTAL THIS INVOICE: $8,782.43
1/ �I
; ,
�./
„4,
/./
• , ,/
• ,
Ralp D. Wagner
,y
1