Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMay 19, 2026 - Council PacketPliaill SHAKOPE E Shakopee City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, May 19, 2026 7:00 PM City Hall, 485 Gorman Street Vision: Shakopee is a distinctive river town with a variety of business, cultural, and recreational opportunities in a safe, welcoming, and attractive environment. Our vision is for Shakopee to continue being the place people want to live, work, and play! Mission: Our mission is to deliver high quality services essential to maintaining a safe and sustainable community. We commit to doing this cost-effectively, with integrity and transparency. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Approval of Agenda 5. Consent Agenda These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these unless a council member or staff requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda for separate discussion & action. 5.a Monthly Financial Review - April 2026 5.b Monetary Limits on Tort Liability for League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust 5.c Approve the Special Event and Temporary Liquor Licenses for Rhythm on the Rails 2026 5.d 2026 Annual Roadway Pavement Markings Project 5.e Walmart Foundation's Spark Good Local Grants Program Application & Award 5.f Approve a Utility Facilities Easement and Pond Maintenance Agreements with KWS Seed 1 5.g Award Contract for the Shenandoah Drive and Schenian Street Intersection Improvements 5.h Accept Xcel Energy's Community Benefit Contribution Donation 5.i Surplus Property 5.j Award of Bid on Police Department Boiler Replacement 5.k Approve a Consumption and Display Permit for Angels LLC. dba Taqueria Don Ramon. 5.1 Approve a Gambling Premises Permit for the Shakopee Rotary 5.m Approval of the May 5, 2026, City Council Minutes 5.n Approve a Cooperative Agreement Amendment with Shakopee Public Schools for the Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Improvements 5.o Approve an Agreement with MnDOT for the Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Grant 5.p Award low bid contract to Building Restoration for Masonry Restoration at Schroeder House. 5.q Approve the Liquor License Renewals for 2026-2027 5.r Authorize Submittal of a Railroad Crossing Elimination Grant Application 5.s Scott County Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan (2026) 5.t Ordinance O2026-013 amending the Entertainment Overlay Zone to include additional properties. 6. Public Comment Individuals may address the City Council about any item not on the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the center table, state their name and address for the clerk's record, and limit their remarks to three minutes. The City Council will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but may refer the matter to staff for a follow up report or direct that matter be scheduled on an upcoming agenda. 7. Business removed from consent agenda 8. General Business 8.a Fire Department 2025 Year in Review 8.b Donation for Sauna and Scholarship Fund in Honor of Xavier Gillen 2 9. Workshop 9.a Long-term financial plan 10. Reports Liaison and Administration 10.a City Bill List 10.b News and Announcements 11. Other Business 12. Adjourn to June 2, 2026, at 7:00 pm 3 WILLA! SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.a May 19, 2026 Monthly Financial Review - April 2026 Nate Reinhardt, Finance Director Action to be considered: Review of April 2026 General Fund revenues and expenditures. Motion Type: Informational only Background: General Fund - April 2026 (see attachment) This early in the year, the timing of one of two large receipts or payments tend to skew the variances. Revenue variances (33% target) • Taxes will remain below budget targets until the 1st half settlement is received in June. • Licenses and permits are tracking ahead of budget targets, primarily from building permits, as the City continues to see growth. • Miscellaneous includes interest earnings on investments, which are tracking ahead of budget targets. Expenditure variances (33% target) • Total departmental expenditures are within the normal range and similar to last year's percentage through April. • Mayor and Council expenditures are currently exceeding budget targets as a result of the timing of annual dues (paid at the beginning of the year). • Finance department expenditures are currently exceeding budget targets as a result of the timing of audit and property assessment contracts (paid at the beginning of the year). • The 2026 Fire department budget does not currently reflect the budget amendment for the Federal SAFER grant award. 4 Recommendation: Information only Budget Impact: N/A Attachments: 2026.04 Monthly Financial Report- with Revenues.pdf 5 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Monthly Financial Report YTD 2026 Budget April 2026 Actual April YTD 2026 Actual Budget Balance Percent Remaining Used 01000 - GENERAL FUND REVENUES: * - TAXES 24,581,880 0 * - SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 17,000 0 * - LICENSES AND PERMITS 4,392,000 561,869 * - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 5,617,250 380,787 * - CHARGES FOR SERVICES 6,548,180 396,127 * - FINES AND FORFEITS 325,200 43,342 * - MISCELLANEOUS 625,700 75,995 TOTAL REVENUES 42,107,210 1,458,120 EXPENDITURES: 11 - MAYOR & COUNCIL (196,400) (7,151) 12 - ADMINISTRATION (2,951,650) (200,394) 13 - CITY CLERK (633,900) (68,154) 15 - FINANCE (1,226,150) (418,604) 17 - PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT (902,450) (56,848) 18 - FACILITIES (666,600) (43,677) 31 - POLICE DEPARTMENT (14,260,280) (1,008,384) 32 - FIRE (4,847,700) (540,771) 33 - INSPECTION-BLDG-PLMBG-HTG (2,316,250) (217,690) 41- ENGINEERING (1,631,700) (97,920) 42 - STREET MAINTENANCE (2,894,450) (155,763) 44 - FLEET (603,170) (41,693) 46 - PARK MAINTENANCE (3,641,810) (245,802) 67 - RECREATION (5,997,100) (424,407) 91 - UNALLOCATED (237,600) (582) TOTAL EXPENDITURES (43,007,210) (3,527,841) OTHER FINANCING * - TRANSFERS IN 900,000 0 * - TRANSFERS OUT 0 0 0 0 1,621,735 1,428,165 1,798,703 100,799 363,239 5,312,642 (91,355) (815,214) (186,849) (625,728) (220,370) (173,785) (3,881,060) (1,688,491) (791,400) (380,764) (748,083) (178,371) (923,009) (1,702,962) (16,793) (12,424,237) 24,581,880 17,000 2,770,265 4,189,085 4,749,477 224,401 262,461 36,794,568 (105,045) (2,136,436) (447,051) (600,422) (682,080) (492,815) (10,379,220) (3,159,209) (1,524,850) (1,250,936) (2,146,367) (424,799) (2,718,801) (4,294,138) (220,807) (30,582,973) 0% y 0%+ 37% 25% 27% 4 31% c 58% T 13% 47% + 28% 29% 51% + 24% 26% 27% 35% c 34% 4 23% 26% 30% 25% 28% 7% 29% (11,220,584) April YTD 2025 Actual 0 0 2,014,494 1,367,060 2,366,792 100,315 315,180 6,163,841 (107,517) (862,240) (123,683) (265,479) (222,399) (174,719) (3,686,517) (1,227,780) (739,311) (384,044) (604,055) (159,664) (1,074,016) (1,587,678) (1,482) 0 900,000 0% 0 0 #DIV/0! OTHER FINANCING TOTAL 900,000 0 FUND TOTAL Key T Varies more than 10% than budget positively y Varies more than 10% than budget negatively -} Within 10% of budget 0 900,000 0% 0 (2,069,720) (7,111,595) 7,111,595 0 0 0 (5,056,743) 6 WILLA! SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.b May 19, 2026 Monetary Limits on Tort Liability for League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust Nate Reinhardt, Finance Director Action to be considered: Approve Resolution R2026-076 Selecting not to waive the statutory limits for liability insurance purposes Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: Each year the LMCIT asks whether the city wishes to waive the monetary limits on tort liability established by state law, Minnesota State 466.04. While this is routine action, the League specifically requires council action. The city's past practice has been not to waive the limits. Assuming the council does not waive the limit, there would be a liability limit of $500,000 for a single claimant and $1,500,000 for all claimants for a single occurrence. Recommendation: Approve Resolution R2026-076 Budget Impact: If the council chooses not to waive coverage, there is no financial impact. However, if it does waive coverage limits, there would be an additional cost for increased insurance premiums. Attachments: R2026-076 Statutory Insurance Limits.docx Liability-Coverage-Waiver-Form.pdf 7 RESOLUTION R2026-076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA REGARDING MAKING A SELECTION NOT TO WAIVE THE STATUATORY LIMITS FOR LIABILITY INSURANCE PURPOSES WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 466.04 has established tort liability for municipalities; and WHEREAS, the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust has asked the City to make an election with regard to waiving or not waiving its tort liability; and WHEREAS, the choices available are as follows: to not waive the statutory municipal liability tort limit; or to waive the tort monetary limit to the limit of liability insurance coverage obtained from the LMCIT; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: that the City Council does hereby elect not to waive the statutory tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 19th day of May 2026. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Prepared by: City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 8 LMCLEAGUE MINNESOTA CITIES LIABILITY COVERAGE WAIVER FORM Members who obtain liability coverage through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) must complete and return this form to LMCIT before their effective date of coverage. Email completed form to your city's underwriter, to pstechnlmc.org, or fax to 651.281.1298. Members who obtain liability coverage from LMCIT must decide whether to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. The decision to waive or not waive the statutory tort limits must be made annually by the member's governing body, in consultation with its attorney if necessary. The decision has the following effects: • If the member does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant could recover no more than $500,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total all claimants could recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $1,500,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether the member purchases the optional LMCIT excess liability coverage. • If the member waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could recover up to $2,000,000 for a single occurrence (under the waive option, the tort cap liability limits are only waived to the extent of the member's liability coverage limits, and the LMCIT per occurrence limit is $2,000,000). The total all claimants could recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to $2,000,000, regardless of the number of claimants. • If the member waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total all claimants could recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants. Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision. Check one: O The member DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minn. Stat. § 466.04. ❑ The member WAIVES the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minn. Stat. § 466.04, to the extent of the limits of the liability coverage obtained from LMCIT. LMCIT Member Name: City of Shakopee Date of member's governing body meeting: May 19, 2026 Name of person completing this form: Nathan Reinhardt Position of person completing this form: Finance Director Signature of person completing this form: League of Minnesota Cities 1/1/2026 Liability Coverage Waiver Form Page 1 9 WILLA! SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.c May 19, 2026 Approve the Special Event and Temporary Liquor Licenses for Rhythm on the Rails 2026 Heidi Emerson, Deputy City Clerk Action to be considered: Approve the special event and temporary liquor licenses, and suspend city code 114.11 (A) to allow consumption on public streets for the Shakopee Chamber of Commerce Rhythm on the Rails 2026 Concert Series being held Wednesdays starting June 17th through July 29, 2026. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: The Shakopee Chamber of Commerce has submitted a special event application and temporary liquor license applications for the 2026 Rhythm on the Rails Concert Series, being held Wednesday evenings from 5:00pm - 9:00pm starting June 17th through July 30th. The event is being held on Lewis Street in downtown Shakopee. Rhythm on the Rails is a free six -week outdoor concert series. Each nightly concert runs from 5:00-9:OOpm on Lewis Street in downtown Shakopee. The series features top notch live music, family fun and games, and food and beverage vendors. Each evening kicks off with a local opening act, followed by a not -to -miss regional headliner. Attendees will have the option to purchase food and drinks, enjoy kids activities and experience the beautiful and historic downtown Shakopee area, while enjoying great company and live music throughout the night. The lineup for 2026 is as follows: Week 1 - Martin Zellar's, A Tribute to Neil Diamond Week 2 - Not Quite Brothers Week 3 - Def Leggand Week 4 - The World According to Garth Week 5 - Parrothead Paradise, A Tribute to Jimmy Buffett Week 6 - The Fabulous Armadillos Party Band 10 The applications are in order and the fees have been paid. The Chamber is requesting that the City Council suspend city code 114.11 (A) Consumption and Possession on Public Streets, Property and the like, to allow patrons to consume alcohol on Lewis Street. All persons purchasing alcohol will be required to show identification and they will be wrist - banded. Only persons who have a wrist -band will be allowed to consume alcohol. The Chamber is also requesting the following: • Lewis Street and the Lewis Street parking lot be closed from 6:00am - 11:00pm each Wednesday of the event. • Street closure signs be posted on Mondays (6/15, 6/22, 7/6, 7/13, 7/20 & 7/27). • Garbage and recycling cans be delivered in the Lewis Street parking lot. • Road closure barricades and signage to be placed at various locations according to the attached maps. Recommendation: Approve the above requested motion. Budget Impact: Staff time will be needed to drop off barricades, garbage and recycling cans, post street closure signs and clear the streets. Most of this can be accomplished during normal working hours. Attachments: Map - No Outside Alcohol Permitted signs Map - Barriers Downtown Map - Street -Parking Lot Closure Map -No Parking Signs 11 N Barriers for downtown Events a a 'or) ro aA a Ii O a o a E o .§ E o < H V) a a U fU CO a in 4C) Ln a cmi t:1 ro o Li) CC 0 13 —NON —Pivot PD will take care of the lights on the barriers U, SHAKOPEE WILLA! Shakopee City Council 5.d May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: 2026 Annual Roadway Pavement Markings Project Prepared by: Jamie Theis, Street Supervisor Reviewed by: Action to be considered: Approve the City of Shakopee's annual roadway maintenance contract for pavement markings. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: On February 18, 2014, the City of Shakopee joined the South Metro JPA for roadway maintenance services with a group of cities with the goal of streamlining contracts and receiving better pricing from contractors. Unfortunately, the JPA is not active this year. The City continues to procure roadway maintenance services independently while remaining open to re-engaging in the JPA or similar cooperative efforts should the group become active again in the future. Request for Quotes were sent to three contractors and one submitted a quote. We were still able to obtain a favorable bid for our annual Pavement Markings project. The bid is competitive and of good value. The contractor is a reputable roadway marking contractor and has successfully completed similar work and contracts for Shakopee for the past five years. Sir Lines -A -Lot, LLC $79,600.00 Recommendation: Authorize the City of Shakopee's annual roadway maintenance contract for pavement markings. Budget Impact: The total amount of the work is estimated at $79,600.00. The cost is within budget and 16 allocated in the Street Maintenance Operation Fund. Attachments: Sir Lines -A -Lot Quote.pdf 2026 Paint Striping Layout.pdf 2026 Symbol Painting.pdf Pavement Markings Contract.pdf 17 QUOTATION FORM Pavement Markings COMPANY NAME: S't c 1_inp S - -Lp , LL_C ADDRESS: -1 f 5j Cast. \ \ (2o c_ of , t dL i v -a , ►M N TELEPHONE: °j, Sa - Cki 3 - &I ' 2� QUOT-A-TIONS ARE DUE BY 11:00 A.M. OCAL TIME, Friday, April 24, 2026. To: Jamison Theis, Street/Utility Supervisor 400 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Email: jtheis@shakopeemn.gov ZIP SS The undersigned, as bidder, hereby proposes and agrees to enter into a contract with the city of Shakopee to supply all labor, materials, and equipment necessary to complete pavement markings in the city of Shakopee, all in accordance with the maps and specifications prepared by the city of Shakopee and in strict accordance with the unit prices herewith. The final amounts of the contract shall be determined by multiplying the final measured quantities as authorized and actually furnished and installed in the manner described in the specifications, by the unit stated in this proposal form. The Contractor will not be entitled to any compensation on any items other than those listed on this proposal form. The bidder must bid each item. The contract award will be based upon the low bid. In the event the unit prices extended do not equal the total bid, the unit prices shall govern to become the total bid. City of Shakopee — Quotation Form Pavement Markings April 2026 Page 1 of 3 18 NO. ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 2026.501 Long Line Street Markings Gallons 1,400 3$.OO 53,aoo.Qo 2 2026.502 Symbols Gallons 165 k Go -o° -,t`400.°° Total Bid: The undersigned agrees as follows: $ k , (000.00 1. The City of Shakopee, Minnesota, reserves the right to reject any and all bids, to waive any minor irregularities in bidding, and/or to accept the bid or bids which best serve the interest of the City of Shakopee. 2. If this quotation is accepted, bidder will enter into a contract and furnish insurance certificate(s) within ten (10) days after bidder's quote is accepted. Bidder agrees to commence work as soon as possible after acceptance and to complete all work on or before the completion date, subject to the provisions of the contract documents. 3. The City of Shakopee, Minnesota, reserves the right to adjust quantities to fit budgeted dollar amounts. Respectfully Submitted, Firm: S\r Lo -k-, By By: (Signature of Bidder) Title: Pre Sicde/ Gl t i se Zia n 0t/6e (Name) / L'] 5 CA A. i (1 i2-OGv G (Address) i-d/Ait, MN 3 (City and State) DATE: 1-1/;-2-/?- 016 City of Shakopee — Quotation Form Pavement Markings April 2026 Page 2 of 3 19 STATE OF MINNESOTA - RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATE Applies to all prime contracts in excess of $50,000 A responsible contractor is defined in Minnesota Statutes §16C.285, subdivision 3. Any prime contractor or subcontractor who does not meet the minimum criteria under Minnesota Statutes §16C.285, subdivision 3, or who fails to verify that it meets those criteria, is not a responsible contractor and is not eligible to be awarded a construction contract for the project or to perform work on the project. A false statement under oath verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria shall render the prime contractor or subcontractor that makes the false statement ineligible to be awarded a construction contract for the project and may result in termination of a contract awarded to a prime contractor or subcontractor that makes a false statement. A prime contractor shall submit to the contracting authority prior to execution of the contract, copies of the signed verifications of compliance from all subcontractors of any tier pursuant to subdivision 3, clause 7. By signing this statement, I, C OVY'irb4, (typed or printed name), Pre 5 C dl.A-k— (tide) certify that I am an owner or officer of the company and do verify under oath that my company is in compliance with each of the minimum criteria listed in the law. Sir u, es— A--(�o-E (name of the person, partnership or corporation submitting this proposal) 'I t'15 CAL.; ct iv , MN c5L{31 (business address) Signed: (bidder or authorized representative) Date City of Shakopee — Quotation Form Pavement Markings April 2026 Page 3 of 3 20 QUOTATION FORM Pavement Markings COMPANY NAME: S`tp_ S - -LA-, 1....L -C. ADDRESS: 1 1'1 S c1'\\ (Z.o ck. of , E o(.1v`ek, m. TELEPHONE: °l,S'a - cktj — 3 g QUOTATIONS ARE DUE BY 11;00 A.M., .LOCAL TIME, -Friday, April 24, 2026; To; Jamison Theis, Street/Utility Supervisor 400 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Email: ,jtheis@shakopeemn.gov ZIP SSLI? The undersigned, as bidder, hereby proposes and agrees to enter into a contract with the city of Shakopee to supply all labor, materials, and equipment necessary to complete pavement markings in the city of Shakopee, all in accordance with the maps and specifications prepared by the city of Shakopee and in strict accordance with the unit prices herewith. The final amounts of the contract shall be determined by multiplying the final measured quantities as authorized and actually furnished and installed in the manner described in the specifications, by the unit stated in this proposal form. The Contractor will not be entitled to any compensation on any items other than those listed on this proposal form. The bidder must bid each item. The contract award will be based upon the low bid. In the event the unit prices extended do not equal the total bid, the unit prices shall govern to become the total bid. City of Shakopee — Quotation Form Pavement Markings April 2026 Pagel of 3 23 NO. ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 2026.501 Long Line Street Markings Gallons 1,400 3$ .OO 53,200.00 2 2026.502 Symbols Gallons 165 l (00.0-o a(o,`{' 00.00 Total Bid: The undersigned agrees as follows: $ 9. , 4,00 0 0 1. The City of Shakopee, Minnesota, reserves the right to reject any and all bids, to waive any minor irregularities in bidding, and/or to accept the bid or bids which best serve the interest of the City of Shakopee. 2. If this quotation is accepted, bidder will enter into a contract and furnish insurance certificate(s) within ten (10) days after bidder's quote is accepted. Bidder agrees to commence work as soon as possible after acceptance and to complete all work on or before the completion date, subject to the provisions of the contract documents. 3. The City of Shakopee, Minnesota, reserves the right to adjust quantities to fit budgeted dollar amounts. Respectfully Submitted, Firm: S‘ v- L �-S- ,1.1_C By: (Signature of Bidder) Title: Pre fete il. Ckhi 5e_ (Name) 1O5- Cahill /2-0A.C1 (Address) Ed r'Aor,, MN S'- / 3 (City and State) DATE: 171/2-2-/D- 0 >6 Van ovTb€ k City of Shakopee — Quotation Form Pavement Markings April 2026 Page 2 of 3 24 STATE OF MINNESOTA - RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATE Applies to all prime contracts in excess of $50,000 A responsible contractor is defined in Minnesota Statutes §16C.285, subdivision 3. Any prime contractor or subcontractor who does not meet the minimum criteria under Minnesota Statutes § 16C.285, subdivision 3, or who fails to verify that it meets those criteria, is not a responsible contractor and is not eligible to be awarded a construction contract for the project or to perform work on the project. A false statement under oath verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria shall render the prime contractor or subcontractor that makes the false statement ineligible to be awarded a construction contract for the project and may result in termination of a contract awarded to a prime contractor or subcontractor that makes a false statement. A prime contractor shall submit to the contracting authority prior to execution of the contract, copies of the signed verifications of compliance from all subcontractors of any tier pursuant to subdivision 3, clause 7. By signing this statement, I, C. hc,t5e_ V &, OVc_ lam— (typed or printed name), Pre -5 C ^ -A-- (tide) certify that I am an owner or officer of the company and do verify under oath that my company is in compliance with each of the minimum criteria listed in the law. Sir „n es— /�—Lo--�, LLC (name of the person, partnership or corporation submitting this proposal) 1 cis Go,l�.. ( l '�-o��t Ect \A 1 MN St -(3c1 (business address) Signed: e (bidder or authorized representative) Date City of Shakopee — Quotation Form Pavement Markings April 2026 Page 3 of 3 25 CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into this 27th day of 2026 by and between Sir Lines -A - Lot LLC, hereinafter called "Contractor", and the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "City." WITNESSETH: That Whereas, the Contractor has become the lowest responsible bidder for furnishing the supervision, labor, tools, equipment, materials and supplies and for constructing the following City improvements: Pavement Markings NOW THEREFORE, the parties to this contract agree to the following: 1. Manner for Completion. The Contractor, at his own proper cost and expense, shall perform all work and furnish all supervision (needed beyond that provided by the City Engineer), labor, material, tools, supplies, machinery and other equipment necessary for the Crack Sealing city streets and parking lots for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, in a workmanlike and substantial manner, as outlined in the Request For Quotation (RFQ). 2. Due Diligence. The maintenance of a rate of progress in the work which will result in its completion in a reasonable time, is an essential feature of this Contract, and the Contractor agrees to proceed with all due diligence and care, at all times to take all precautions to insure the time of completion as defined in this Contract. The Contractor shall fully complete the work called for under the Contract in accordance with the RFQ. 3. Payment. The City will pay the Contractor those prices stipulated in the Contractor's Quotation, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Contract, which shall constitute full and complete compensation for the contractor's work provided hereunder. The parties specifically agree and understand and the Contractor specifically waives any claim for additional compensation for any changed condition whether arising out of a physical condition at the site of an unusual nature, differing materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character and at the location provided for in the Contract or arising as a result of any force majeur. 4. Contractor's Responsibility for Subcontractors. It is further agreed that Contractor shall be as fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as Contractor is for the acts and omissions of persons it directly employs. Contractor shall cause appropriate provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts relating to this work, to bind all subcontractors to Contractor by all the terms herein set forth, insofar as applicable to the work of subcontractors and to give Contractor the same power regarding termination of any subcontract as the City may exercise over Contractor under any City of Shakopee — Contract Pavement Markings April 2026 Page 1 of 4 26 provisions of this contract. Nothing contained in this Contract shall create any contractual relation between the subcontractor and the City or between any subcontractors. 5. Payment to Subcontractors. The Contractor shall pay any subcontractor within ten days of receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. If the Contractor fails to pay within ten days, the Contractor shall pay the subcontractor interest at the rate of one and one-half percent per month or part of month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor, in accordance with Minn. State. Sec. 471.425, Subd. 4a. 6. City Instructions. The City may declare the contract forfeited, should the Contractor persistently disregard instructions of the City or fail to observe or perform any provisions of this Contract. 7. Requirements of Performance Bond. The successful bidder, at the time of the execution of the Contract, shall furnish and at all times maintain a satisfactory and sufficient bond in full amount of the Contract as required by law with a corporate surety satisfactory to the Owner. The form of bond is that required by statute. Personal sureties will not be approved. 8. Indemnity. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, and save the City harmless from and against all claims, suits and actions of every description, brought against the City and from all damage and costs by reason or on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person or persons, or their property, by Contractor, its servants, agents or subcontractors in the construction of said work, or by any negligence or carelessness in the performance of same, or on account of any other wrongful act or omission, including breach of any provision of this Contract, of Contractor, its independent subcontractors, agents, employees, or delegates. The Contractor further agrees to indemnify the City for defense cost incurred in defending any claims, unless the City is determined to be at fault. The Contractor shall provide a Certificate of Insurance with the City of Shakopee named as an additional insured. The limits of liability shall be as follows: Worker's Compensation (1) State Statutory (2) Applicable Federal (e.g. Longshoreman's): Statutory (3) Employer's Liability: $2,000,000 Contractor's Liability Insurance including completed operations and product liability coverages and eliminate the exclusion with respect to property under the care, custody and control of Contractor: City of Shakopee — Contract Pavement Markings April 2026 Page 2 of 4 27 (1) General Aggregate (Except Products - Completed Operations) $2,000,000 (2) Products - Completed (Operations Aggregate) $2,000,000 (3) Personal and Advertising Injury (Per Person/Organization) $2,000,000 (4) Each Occurrence (Bodily Injury and Property Damage) $2,000,000 (5) Property Damage Liability Insurance will provide explosion, collapse and underground coverages $2,000,000 where applicable. (6) Excess Liability General Aggregate $2,000,000 Each Occurrence $2,000,000 Automobile Liability: (1) Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 Each Person $2,000,000 Each Accident Property Damage: $2,000,000 Each Accident or (2) Combined Single Limit (Bodily Injury and Property Damage) $2,000,000 Each Accident 9. Duplicate Originals. This Contract shall be executed in two copies; one (1) copy being retained by the City, one (1) to be delivered to the Contractor. City of Shakopee — Contract Pavement Markings April 2026 Page 3 of 4 28 10. Nondiscrimination. The Contractor agrees in the performance of this Contract not to discriminate on the ground or because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation or age, against any employee of Contractor or applicant for employment, and shall include a similar provision in all subcontracts let or awarded hereunder 11. Jurisdiction. This agreement and every question arising hereunder shall be construed or determined according to the laws of the State of Minnesota. CONTRACTOR By Chaise VanOverbeke, President By I City of Shakopee — Contract Pavement Markings April -2026 CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA By Matt Lehman/Mayor By William Reynolds/City Administrator Page 4 of 4 29 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. DOCUMENTS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS A. EXECUTION, CORRELATION AND INTENT OF DOCUMENTS Work shall be governed by all applicable Federal, State, and Local Laws, regulations, codes, and ordinances and the project plans and specifications. B. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS The City of Shakopee (Owner), through the City Engineer (Engineer), shall furnish plans and specifications that represent the requirements of the work as far as practical to be performed under this project. Any work that may reasonably be inferred from the project plans and specifications as being required to produce the intended result shall be supplied whether or not it is specifically called for. Work, materials, or equipment described in words that so applied have a well known technical or trade meaning shall be deemed to refer to such recognized standards. C. INCLUSION OF OTHER SPECIFICATIONS, RULES AND REGULATIONS All work and material covered by these specifications must conform to the current respective requirements of the following documents unless specified otherwise within the Special Provisions: (1) City Ordinances of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (2) State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation (MN/DOT), "Standard Specifications for Construction", 2018 Edition, including the most recent addenda and revisions (also referred to as Mn/DOT Specifications or Mn/DOT requirements). (3) Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD). Any conflict between items in the above, between themselves, or with these specifications must be submitted to the Engineer for adjustment, the prime object being to obtain the best quality installation possible. 2. INSURANCE Prior to the commencement of work, Certificates of all insurance required on a form approved by the City Clerk, signed by an authorized representative of the insurance carrier and stating that all provisions of the specified requirements are satisfied shall be provided by the Contractor. The CITY OF SHAKOPEE shall be named as an additional insured on all policies required under this section. A. Liability Insurance 1) Required insurance and amounts as follows: a. Worker's Compensation: State: Applicable Federal (e.g. Longshoreman's): Employer's Liability: Statutory Statutory $2,000,000 b. Contractor's Liability Insurance including completed operations and product liability City of Shakopee — RFQ GC Pavement Markings April 2026 GC -Page 1 of 7 30 coverages and eliminate the exclusion with respect to property under the care, custody and control of the Contractor General Aggregate (Except Products — Completed Operations) Products — Completed (Operations Aggregate) Personal and Advertising Injury (Per Person/Organization) Each Occurance (Bodily Injury and Property Damage) Property Damage Liability Insurance will provide explosion, collapse and underground coverages where applicable Excess Liability General Aggregate Each Occurrence c. Automobile Liability: Or Bodily Injury Each Person Each Accident Property Damage Each Accident $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Combined Single Limit (Bodily Injury and Property Damage) $2,000,000 d. Policy must include a waiver of any or all Governmental Immunity and must indemnify and hold harmless the City and/or its agents and others as required. List project and work. 2) The policy shall be a standard form policy provided for by a carrier approved by the State of Minnesota and shall not contain any exclusions that will restrict coverage on any operations performed by this Contractor or any Subcontractor thereof. 3) The policy or policies shall afford Contractual Liability coverage to provide coverage for the Indemnification Agreement set out in Section 2.E. 4) It is a condition of the Contract that the policy or policies waive any or all governmental City of Shakopee — RFQ GC Pavement Markings April 2026 GC -Page 2 of 7 31 immunity as a defense in any action brought against the insured or any other party to the Contract, up to policy limits. 5) The policy shall further provide insurance to cover all of the Contractor's operating exposures and the operation of vehicles. 6) Approval of the insurance by the City shall not in any way relieve or decrease the liability of the Contractor hereunder, and it is expressly understood that the City or the Engineer does not in any way represent that the above specified insurance or limits of liability are sufficient or adequate to protect the Contractor's interest or liabilities. 7) In the event of cancellation of any of the policies, the company issuing the Certificate of Insurance shall provide 30 days written notice to the City. Failure to do so shall impose obligation and/or liability upon the issuing company. Certificate of Insurance forms shall be drafted or altered to reflect these conditions. B. Notice of Cancellation or Non -Renewal The City shall be given at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of any cancellation, termination or material modification of the required insurance coverages, and the insurance policies required herein shall so provide. C. Deductibles All responsibility for payment of sums resulting from any deductible provision, corridor, or self - insured retention conditions of the policy or policies shall remain with the Contractor. D. Indemnification The Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, commissioners either elected or appointed, officers, agents and/or employees from and against all claims, damages, losses or expenses, including attorney fees, for which they may be held liable, arising out of or resulting from the assertion against them of any claims, debts or obligations resulting from or arising out of directly or indirectly, the performance of this Agreement by the Contractor, their employees, agents or subcontractors. 3. WORK COMPLETION, SUSPENSION & RESUMPTION STIPULATIONS A. COMPLETION The Contractor will be required to begin work within thirty (30) days of Notice to Proceed and is to complete the installation on or before the completion date specified in the Special Provisions or the Proposal Form for the project. B. SUSPENSION AND RESUMPTION OF WORK The Engineer shall have the authority to suspend the Contractor's operations wholly or in part, for such period or periods of time as may deem necessary because of unsuitable weather or other conditions that the Engineer considers unfavorable for the prosecution of the work, or for such time as is necessary due to the failure on the part of the Contractor to carry out orders given or perform any or all of the provisions of the contract. Such "Suspension of Work Order" shall be in City of Shakopee — RFQ GC Pavement Markings April 2026 GC -Page 3 of 7 32 writing, and shall state the reason for such suspension, the effective date and time, and the operation suspended. All work done by the Contractor contrary to such "Suspension of Work Order" shall be considered as unauthorized work and as having been done at the expense of the Contractor. 4. MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENTS A. MEASUREMENT OF QUANTITIES Work completed in an acceptable form as determined by the Engineer shall be measured by the units specified in the Proposal Form or otherwise described in the Special Provisions. B. PAYMENT Payment at the unit price provided in the Proposal Form shall be full compensation for all labor, materials, coordination and equipment necessary to furnish and install the item, unless otherwise specified in the Special Provisions. Final payment shall not act as a waiver of the right of the Owner to require fulfillment of all terms of the Contract. 5. CONTROL OF WORK AND MATERIALS A. HOURS OF OPERATION 1. No construction equipment shall be operated between 7:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. weekdays unless specifically authorized by the Engineer. 2. No work shall be done on Saturdays or Sundays unless special approval is granted by the Engineer. If authorized, working hours on weekends are 9:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M. 3. The Contractor shall notify the Owner in advance of all times when staff are to work on the construction site. 4. Should work by the Owner or other special conditions require temporary suspension of the Contractor's activities, the Contractor shall comply and reschedule the work at no additional cost to the Owner. B. OWNER REPRESENTATIVE'S STATUS AND DECISIONS In carrying out any of the provisions of the contract, or in exercising any power or authority granted to the Contractor thereby, there shall be no personal liability upon the contracting officer or the authorized representatives, it being understood that in such matter they act as agents and representatives of the Owner. The Engineer shall have general supervision and direction of the work. The Engineer has authority to stop the work whenever such stoppage may be necessary to ensure the proper execution of the work. The Engineer shall also have the right, as the work progresses, to alter the plans or specified coordination of two or more concurrent contractors subject to the limits specified herein. C. CONTROL OF MATERIALS All materials furnished by the Contractor shall meet the requirements of these specifications. 1 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF MATERIALS: Final inspection and acceptance of City of Shakopee — RFQ GC Pavement Markings April 2026 GC -Page 4 of 7 33 material will be made only at the site of the work. The Owner reserves the right to sample, inspect, and test materials throughout the duration of the work, and to reject any materials that are found to be unsatisfactory at the time of use. 2 DEFECTIVE MATERIAL: All materials that do not conform to the requirements of these specifications shall be considered defective and will not be approved. All defective material must be removed from the construction area. Any portion of the work in which any defective material may have been used shall be considered as defective work. 3 DEFECTIVE WORK: All work and materials that do not conform to the requirements of the contract shall be considered as defective and will not be approved. When so ordered by the Engineer in writing, all defective work shall be remedied or repaired, or, if necessary, removed and replaced in an acceptable manner by the Contractor. If the Contractor fails or refuses to remedy or repair any defective work or materials or to remove and replace such work or materials, within the period specified in such written order, the Owner shall have the right, at its option: a) To take over and use such defective work by payment to the Contractor of an amount equal to the reasonable value of such work; or b) to cause such defective work to be remedied or repaired, or removed and replaced, and deduct the cost thereof from any monies due or that may become due the Contractor or require reimbursement therefore from the surety of the contract bond. When such defective work has been remedied or repaired, or removed and replaced by the Contractor, the Contractor will be credited with an amount equal to the value of the completed work based on the contract price or price therefore. If the Contractor continues to perform defective work, the City may declare the Contractor in default. D. PROSECUTION OF WORK NEAR PUBLIC UTILITIES PROPERTIES It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to obtain complete information of the existence and location of underground utilities that may be adjacent to the work. The Contractor shall be responsible for and shall preserve and protect all utilities that are above ground surface and below ground surface whether or not the approximate locations are shown in the plans. The Contractor shall assume full responsibility for reimbursing the owners thereof for any damage or injury to such utilities that may be caused by his/her operations. The Contractor shall at no time hinder or interfere with any person engaged in protecting or moving utility properties or in the operation of the utility. The Contractor shall give notice to the owners of all utilities at least 48 hours before starting any construction operations that will affect such properties. If, during the course of the Contractor's operations, he/she discovers utility properties, the existence of which was not known, the Contractor shall immediately notify the owner thereof and the Engineer. E. PROTECTION OF THE PUBLIC, THE WORK AND PROPERTY The Contractor shall operate in a safe and non -hazardous fashion, maintaining full compliance with OSHA standards and good work standards, complying with all the Federal, State and Municipal laws. City of Shakopee — RFQ GC Pavement Markings April 2026 GC -Page 5 of 7 34 The Contractor shall continuously maintain adequate protection of all work from damage, and take all reasonable precautions to protect the Owner's property from injury or loss arising in connection with this project. The Contractor shall make good any damage, injury or loss to his work or to the property of the Owner that results from lack of reasonable protective precautions, except such as may be caused by agents or employees of the Owner. The Contractor shall make adequate provisions to protect adjacent private and public property. The Contractor shall assume, and shall be held liable for necessary equipment and personnel required to conform to these specifications. All cost related to protection of the public, the work and property shall be borne by the Contractor. The Contractor shall erect and maintain all signs and barricades required to conform with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD) prior to commencing any work within public streets, sidewalks, easements or right-of-way. The Contractor shall be responsible for installing adequate traffic control and safety devices to protect the public, including pedestrians and vehicular traffic. The Engineer shall have the authority to stop any work until the Contractor brings signing and barricades into conformance with MMUTCD. If the Contractor fails to act in a timely fashion to bring signing and barricades into conformance with MMUTCD or if emergency conditions require immediate action, the Engineer can install proper signing and barricades and charge the cost of such work to the Contractor. F. PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OF PROPERTY The Contractor shall not enter upon private property for any propose without obtaining permission. The Contractor shall notify, in writing, the owners of all corporate or private property that will be interfered with by the operations, advising them of the nature of the interference, and arranging with them for the protection of such property. The Contractor shall furnish the Engineer, upon request, with copies of all such notifications and final agreements. The Contractor shall protect and carefully preserve all property monuments until the Owner, or an authorized surveyor or agent, has witnessed or otherwise referenced their location or relocation. The Contractor shall be responsible for any damage occasioned by or resulting from the operations, work or materials to property of any kind outside the construction area, or within the construction area and below the ground surface if such property is shown in the plans, or its existence is indicated in the Special Provisions. The Contractor shall also be responsible for any damage, occasioned by or resulting from the operations, to property of any kind within the construction area and below ground surface, the existence of which is not shown in the Plans or indicated in the Special Provisions, provided the Contractor is notified of its existence before such damage is done. If such property is damaged or destroyed by the Contractor's operations, work, or materials, the Contractor shall, at the Contractor's own expense, restore such property to a condition equal to or better than that existing before such damage or injury was done by repairing, rebuilding, or replacing it as may be directed, or shall otherwise make good such damage or destruction in an acceptable manner. G. WARRANTY/GUARANTEE Any defective materials, workmanship or equipment shall be corrected by the Contractor, at no City of Shakopee — RFQ GC Pavement Markings April 2026 GC -Page 6 of 7 35 cost to the Owner, for a period of two years after date of acceptance of the project. If, in the opinion of the Engineer, it is not expedient to correct injured work, or work not done in accordance with the contract, the Owner may deduct the difference in value between the work involved and that called for by the contract, together with fair allowance for damages, the amount of which shall be determined by the Engineer. The Contractor shall be responsible for any and all defects that may develop in any part of the entire installation furnished by the Contractor and upon receipt of written notice from the Engineer, shall immediately replace and make good without expense to the Owner such faulty part or parts, including damage resulting from same, during a period of two (2) years from the date of final acceptance of the installation, except when specific warranty and guarantee for work and materials for another length of time is elsewhere specified. The acceptance of the installation, or any part of it, shall not act to waive the liability on the part of the Contractor and the Contractors surety. H. REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL Items removed by the Contractor shall be disposed of outside of the City of Shakopee and in compliance with all Federal, State, and Local regulations, laws, codes and requirements. Removal items shall become the property of the Contractor unless specifically identified for salvage in the Special Provisions. I. SUBCONTRACTOR The Contractor shall be as fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as Contractor is for the acts and omissions of persons it directly employs. Contractor shall cause appropriate provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts relating to this work, to bind all subcontractors to Contactor by all the terms herein set forth, insofar as applicable to the work of subcontractors and to give Contractor the same power regarding termination of any subcontract as the City may exercise over Contractor under any provisions of the contract. Nothing contained in the Contract shall create any contractual relation between the subcontractor and the city or between any subcontractors. The Contractor shall pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of receipt of payment from the city for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. If the Contractor fails to pay within ten (10) days, the Contractor shall pay the subcontractor interest at the rate of one and one-half percent per month or part of month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor, in accordance with Minn. State. Sec. 471.425, Subd. 4a. City of Shakopee — RFQ GC Pavement Markings April 2026 GC -Page 7 of 7 36 for the application of pavement markings and is compensation in full for all costs incidental thereto (traffic contr ol). Bid Item Unit 4A Long Line Street Markings GAL (gallons) 4B Symbol Markings GAL (gallons) 4C Parking Lot Markings GAL (gallons) City of Shakopee — RFQ Specs Pavement Markings April 2026 Specs -Page 5 of 5 37 SHAKOPE Specifications and Special Provisions Pavement Markings I. DESCRIPTION A. Long Line Street Markings Long Line Street Markings are longitudinal linear pavement markings installed on a roadway that are line segments of various widths. These markings include but are not limited to lane lines, center lines, no passing zone lines and edge lines. These markings do not include stop bars, crosshatch, crosswalk markings or messages. All markings of this category can and will be applicator truck applied. B. Symbol Markings Symbol Markings include pavement messages, words, symbols and transverse or crosshatch line segments of various widths installed on a roadway. These markings include but are not limited to stop bars, crosshatch, crosswalk markings, arrows and words written on the roadway. All markings of this category are hand applied with stencils. C. Parking Lot Markings Parking Lot Markings include all pavement messages, words, symbols and line segments of various widths installed on a parking lot. These markings include but are not limited to stall lines, arrows, crosshatch and handicapped symbols. II. MATERIALS A. Paint Provide a qualified High Solids Water -Based Traffic Paint in accordance with Mn/DOT 3591. Qualified materials can found on Mn/DOTS Qualified Products List on the Office of Traffic, Safety and Operations website. The Contractor must submit the manufactures written certification listing the batch and lot number, quantity and certifying that the product meets the appropriate Mn/DOT specifications to each LGU. B. Drop -On Glass Beads Provide qualified Drop -On Glass Beads in accordance with Mn/DOT S 3592. Qualified materials can found on Mn/DOTS Qualified Products List on the Office of Traffic, Safety and Operations website. The Contractor must submit the manufactures written certification listing the batch and City of Shakopee - RFQ Specs Pavement Markings April 2026 Page 1 of 6 38 lot number, quantity and certifying that the product meets the appropriate Mn/DOT specifications to each LGU. C. Temporary Raised Pavement Markers (TRPM) Provide approved TRPM per the TRPM usage document found on the Temporary Raised Pavement Markers Approved/Qualified Products List. III. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS A. General The Contractor shall notify the City at least one (1) week in advance of the starting date of the work within their jurisdiction. This shall be followed up the day before the work is scheduled to start. The Work shall start and progress on a daily basis without quitting the site, without prior approval of the LGU. The City shall notify the Contractor when TRPM are required to be placed. The Contractor shall have the TRPM installed within 5 days of such notice. The City shall notify the Contractor when the seal coat areas are ready for permanent Pavement Markings. 95% of the Pavement Markings (without City supervision and oversight) shall be completed within 7 days of the notice. B. Traffic Control The Contractor is responsible for the maintenance, control and safeguard of all traffic within and immediately abutting the work areas. All streets are to remain open to traffic, unless otherwise specified, agreed to or required by the City. All traffic control shall be Contractor designed and in accordance with the provisions of Mn/DOT Specifications 1404, 1514, 1515, 1707, and 1710, the Minnesota Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD) and as approved by the LGU. The Contractor shall furnish, erect and maintain traffic control devises to adequately warn and protect the public from all hazards directly or indirectly caused by construction. All traffic control devises shall be removed at the end of each day, unless as otherwise needed or directed. Through traffic from both directions shall be maintained whenever practical. When single lane traffic is necessary, flagpersons must be provided to direct traffic. The Contractor shall furnish at their own expense all required flagpersons. Where parking is a hazard to through traffic or to the Work, it shall be restricted either entirely or during the time when it creates a hazard. Signs for this purpose shall be furnished, placed and paid for by the Contractor, as allowed or directed by the governing road authority. City of Shakopee - RFQ Specs Pavement Markings April 2026 Page 2 of 6 39 The Contractor is responsible for all Traffic Control as specified without direct compensation for such; it shall be incidental to the Work The Contractor shall install, maintain promptly remove traffic control once track free marking are obtained. The Contractor may request to work nights with the City's permission. All traffic control required for night work shall be used and is incidental to the request. C. Weather, Time and Date Limitations Construct pavement markings operations according to the following: 1. Work only during daylight hours unless otherwise arranged. 2. Start when the pavement and air temperature are 50 OF and rising. 3. The road surface is dry and reasonably expected to stay dry during drying period of paint. 4. No construction is allowed in foggy weather. 5. No construction in windy conditions that carry overspray off work area. D. TRPM The Pavement Markings Contractor shall furnish and install all TRPM for roadways and parking lots to be seal coated with sufficient time for the City to check and the Contractor correct the TRPM before seal coating operations commence. TRPM shall provide horizontal and longitudinal control for Pavement Markings and serve as interim pavement markings for the seal coat. Interim pavement marking specifications can be obtained for Mn/DOT's Office of Traffic, Safety and Operations website. TRPM shall be incidental to the Pavement Markings. E. Equipment 1. Applicator Truck The applicator truck supplied shall be of adequate size and power to apply long line pavement markings in a continuous manner for whole roadways several miles in length. The applicator truck shall be able to place double lines on the left side and a single line on the right side all in either a continuous or intermittent manner. Line placement shall be in full view of the operator and the applicator truck shall have a video guidance system for the driver. The applicator truck shall have a glass bead dispenser system capable of applying the beads at the rate specified. The applicator truck shall be able to and will air blast in front of each line application. Each line applicator shall have a nonadjustable resettable foot accumulator activated only with paint application and each paint tank shall have a gallon meter that measures to the tenth (0.1) of a gallon. The applicator truck shall City of Shakopee - RFQ Specs Pavement Markings April 2026 Page 3 of 6 40 have paint agitators, heaters and recirculator. The applicator truck and any follow vehicles shall have rotating beacons, warning signs, arrow boards and all other devices needed to conduct operations in a safe and efficient manner. The applicator truck shall be in good working order, shall have one operator capable of making needed repairs and technical adjustments to the equipment and each crew shall have a technical expert knowledgeable in application techniques, traffic control and safety operations and regulations (this can be the same person). 2. Paint Truck Each paint truck used in the application of symbols and parking lot markings shall have rotating beacons, warnings signs, arrow boards and all other devices needed to conduct operations in a safe and efficient manner. All equipment shall be in good working order, shall have one operator capable of making needed repairs and technical adjustments to the equipment and each crew shall have a technical expert knowledgeable in application techniques, traffic control and safety operations and regulations (this can be the same person). Each paint tank shall have a gallon meter that measures to the tenth (0.1) of a gallon. F. Pavement Preparation The City will provide initial spring sweeping roadways, work is not to start before sweeping operations are complete. Contractor shall air blast prior to all long line applications and may air blast or shall at a minimum hand sweep all symbol and parking lot markings prior to application. Contractor shall sweep prior to all applications within liquidated damages period. G. Paint Application 1. Control Application is over existing lines or TRPM used as control. The City will not provide any horizontal or longitudinal control. 2. Layout All pavement markings shall be laid out according to the MMUTCD. The Contractor shall notify the City if existing markings do not meet the MMUTCD. Broken line pavement markings shall use the MMUTCD standard 10' line on, 40' line off cycle. 3. Rate *15 MIL = 320 LF/Gal C/D The paint shall be applied with a wet -film thickness of at least-2&mil, or 320 linear feet of 4" line per gallon and 100 square foot of symbols per gallon. Apply at a greater thickness based on pavement condition per Citys approval. Glass beads shall be applied at 8 pounds per gallon of paint immediately following the application of paint. City of Shakopee - RFQ Specs Pavement Markings April 2026 Page 4 of 6 41 4. Tolerance Line Work Minimum linear pavement markings shall not be less than the specified width and shall not vary by more than 1/4". The width will not vary by a rate more than 1/4"/10 ft. The broken line segments shall not vary by more than 3" and the number of broken line segments shall be between 102 and 108 per mile of marked pavement. Alignment deviations from the control guide or existing lines shall not exceed 2". The transverse position of linear markings shall not vary more than the rate of 1"/10 ft. Pavement marking material shall not be applied over a longitudinal joint. Symbols All symbols shall be applied with stencils or some other suitable template of appropriate size. Dimensions of symbols are available from Mn/DOT's Office of Traffic, Safety and Operations. Any deviation of 1" from acceptable stencil size is out of tolerance. H. Protection of Surface Acceptable levels of traffic control shall remain in place and be maintained until the paint is track free. Any tire tracks of paint from unacceptable levels of traffic control shall removed as unacceptable work. The Contractor is responsible for all claims of damage to motor vehicles. I. Correction of Defects/Price Reductions All pavement markings out of tolerance shall be removed and replaced or otherwise repaired to the satisfaction of the City or may be accepted and remain in place at no cost to the City. Any paint drippings, splatter or unacceptable overspray shall be removed. Removal of unacceptable work shall be accomplished with suitable blasting or grinding equipment unless other means are accepted by the City; 95% of the unacceptable work and 1" wider than the marking shall be removed, without unacceptable scaring of the pavements surface. Where yield computations show a deficiency in material usage of not more than 20%, the City may require satisfactory repair or may accept the work at a reduced unit price which will be twice the percentage of the material deficiency. Where deficiency of material is greater than 20% the Contractor will be required to reapply the markings. Where yield calculations show a 10% overage of material the City will not have to pay for any overage greater than 10%, if consistent overage is shown (more than 10% of markings are 10% over yield) that City will not have to pay any overage. If 5% of pavement markings are out of tolerance (including any amount removed and replaced, repaired or accepted at no cost) and/or 10% of markings are out of acceptable yield City of Shakopee - RFQ Specs Pavement Markings April 2026 Page 5 of 6 42 (including any amount repaired, accepted at a reduced unit price or reapplied) the Contractor's Contract shall be cancelled on failure to perform and the Contractor shall be considered a non -responsible Bidder for the next 3 years afterward. IV. METHOD OF MEASUREMENT All measurement shall be on a gallon of paint basis for the application of pavement markings as specified above. The Contractor shall keep documentation of dates, streets worked on, type, length and quantities of items and paint applied as proper documentation for payment. V. BASIS OF PAYMENT Payment for accepted quantities of pavement markings shall be at the combined Unit Price Bid Items below. Payment is compensation in full for all costs of furnishing loading, unloading and delivering all material, is compensation in full for all labor, equipment (including mobilization) and materials necessary for the application of pavement markings and is compensation in full for all costs incidental thereto (traffic control). Bid Item Unit 4A Long Line Street MarkingsGal (gallons) 4B Symbol MarkingsGal (gallons) 4C Parking Lot MarkingsGal (gallons) City of Shakopee - RFQ Specs Pavement Markings April 2026 Page 6 of 6 43 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.e May 19, 2026 Walmart Foundation's Spark Good Local Grants Program Application & Award Andrea Harrell, Grants and Special Projects Coordinator Chelsea Petersen, Assistant City Administrator Action to be considered: Adopt Resolution R2026-079, approving an application to the Walmart Foundation's Spark Good Local Grants program and subsequent grant award. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: The Walmart Foundation's Spark Good Local Grants program strengthens local communities by investing in the communities Walmart and Sam's Club serves. Local grants are designed to support local organizations that meet the unique needs of the communities where they operate, build pride among associates, and deepen relationships with their customers. Each year, Walmart U.S. stores, Sam's Clubs, and their Distribution Centers award local cash grants to organizations in their community. Recently, the local Sam's Club Distribution Center reached out to invite the City to apply for the Spark Good grant, stating that a set amount of $10,000 has been designated to the City to provide $5,000 grants to both the Fire and Police Departments for equipment and/or projects of the Departments' choosing. The Shakopee Fire Department will be requesting and utilizing the funds to purchase replacement ballistic armored vests. The Shakopee Police Department will be requesting and utilizing the funds to purchase a DARE mascot costume and supplies for upcoming community engagement events. Recommendation: Adopt Resolution R2026-079. Budget Impact: The grant requires a 0% match. Attachments: Resolution R2026-079.docx 44 RESOLUTION R2026-079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING THE CITY TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO WALMART FOUNDATION'S SPARK GOOD LOCAL GRANT AND ACCEPT THE SUBSEQUENT GRANT AWARD WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee supports the application made to the Walmart Foundation Spark Good Local Grant program, and WHEREAS, the local Sam's Club Distribution Center has invited the City of Shakopee to apply for the grant with a pre -determined funding amount of $10,000 designated to the City's application, and WHEREAS, the application is to obtain funding to purchase a DARE mascot costume and supplies to support community engagement events within the Police Department and to purchase replacement ballistic armor vests for use within the Fire Department, and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee recognizes a 0% match is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: the City of Shakopee recognizes that with the submission of the grant application to the Spark Good Local grant program, it will be awarded the grant by the Walmart Foundation. The City of Shakopee agrees to accept the grant award and grant agreement for the above - referenced project, and authorizes the City Administrator to execute the necessary contracts and agreements applicable to accepting this award. The City of Shakopee will comply with all applicable laws, requirements, and regulations as stated in the grant agreement. Adopted in the regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 19th day of May 2026. Matt Lehman, Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Richard Parsons City Clerk 45 WILLA! SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.f May 19, 2026 Approve a Utility Facilities Easement and Pond Maintenance Agreements with KWS Seed Darin Manning, Project Engineer Alex Jordan, City Engineer Action to be considered: Approve a Utility Facilities Easement and Pond Maintenance Agreements as an approved condition of the KWS Seed building permit located at 1325 Valley View Road, Shakopee, Minnesota. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: As part of the KWS building permit, private utilities (including sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer) were constructed. The private utilities connect to City of Shakopee public utilities. In an effort to protect the public infrastructure, the developer must record a Utility Facilities Easement and Pond Maintenance Agreement. The Utility Facilities Easement and Pond Maintenance Agreements are a template city agreement required of all private developments and was a condition of approval for the building permit pertaining to this development. The purpose of these agreements is to protect the city from non -compliant and non -responsive property owner who fails to do so. This agreement also allows the city to collect all expenses related to any such maintenance or repairs. Recommendation: Approval of Utility Facilities Easement and Pond Maintenance Agreements. Budget Impact: None. The developer is responsible for the recording and filing fees. Attachments: KWS Seeds, LLC - Pond Maintenance Easement Agreement.pdf KWS Seeds, LLC - Utility Facilities Easement Agreement.pdf 46 (Pond Maintenance) POND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT AGREEMENT This Pond Maintenance Easement Agreement (the "Easement") is made as of January 14, 2026, by KWS Seeds, LLC f/k/a Betaseed, Inc.), a Minnesota limited liability company ("Owner") in favor of the CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Owner is the fee owner of the real property legally described on the attached Exhibit A (the "Property"). WHEREAS, Owner desires to grant to the City the certain easement over a portion of the Property described on Exhibit B and as depicted on Exhibit C (the "Easement Area") according to the terms and conditions contained herein. TERMS OF EASEMENTS 1. Grant of Easement. For good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged by Owner, Owner grants and conveys to the City a perpetual non-exclusive easement for pond maintenance purposes over, under, across, and through the Easement Area. 2. Scope of Easements. The perpetual pond maintenance easement granted herein include the right of the City, its contractors, agents, and employees to enter the Easement Area at all reasonable times for the purpose of installing, constructing, reconstructing, operating, maintaining, inspecting, altering, repairing, and removing within the Easement Area any of the following facilities: storm sewer and treatment facilities, and ground surface drainage ways. The easement granted herein also include the right to cut, trim, or remove from the Easement Area any trees, shrubs, or other vegetation as in the City's judgment unreasonably interfere with the easement or the function of the facilities located therein. 3. Owner's Obligations. The Owner shall maintain the stormwater pond and any related stormwater facilities located on the Easement Area. Maintenance of such stormwater pond includes: (i) removal of sediment and pollutants in all pre-treatment devices; (ii) periodic removal of sedimentation within the stormwater pond; and (iii) removal of any blockage as necessary, and annual inspections. The maintenance work is intended to maintain the original design, volumes and configurations which were approved by the City. Annual inspections of 1 47 such stormwater pond must include an annual report, using the form attached as Exhibit D. Any unsatisfactory maintenance items identified in the annual inspection shall be remedied within sixty (60) days after the inspection and prior to the Annual Inspection Report being provided to the City, subject to force majeure events or seasonal issues that may delay such remedy being completed. A copy of the annual report must be provided to the City of Shakopee Public Works Department within ninety (90) days after the inspection. Upon reasonable advance written notice to Owner, City may enter the Property for the purpose of inspecting the Easement Area and enforcement of the obligations of Owner under this Easement, the City must provide written notice of default to Owner before taking any corrective action. If the failure continues for 30 days after the City's written notice, the City may take whatever actions it deems reasonably necessary in order to fulfill the obligations of Owner under this Easement. If it is determined by the City that it is an emergency and is necessary to enter the Property to maintain or repair any of the Easement Area to protect public utility facilities or the public health, safety or welfare without first giving such notice to the Owner, it may do so, giving the Owner such notice as is reasonably possible under the circumstances. Owner must reimburse the City for the reasonable out-of-pocket costs incurred by the City for its corrective action within 30 days after receipt by Owner of a written demand from the City accompanied by reasonable documentation of the expenses. If Owner fails to reimburse the City within the 30 -day period prescribed above, the City may recover its costs by assessing the amounts against the Property to be collected with property taxes. Owner waives all rights that it might have to receive notice and a hearing or to contest these assessments. Further, City may enforce the terms of this Easement by any proceeding in law or in equity to restrain violation, to compel compliance, or to recover damages, including attorneys' fees and costs of the enforcement actions. The Owner is not liable for the actions of any third party, other than its employees, agents, or contractors, that may violate the terms of this Easement unless the Owner, its employees, agents, or contractors had actual knowledge of the violation in advance and failed to take reasonable action to attempt to stop the violation. 4. Environmental Matters. The City shall not be responsible for any costs, expenses, damages, demands, obligations, including penalties and reasonable attorney's fees, or losses resulting from any claims, actions, suits or proceedings based upon a release or threat of release of any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants which may have existed on, or which relate to, the Easement Area or the Property prior to the date of this instrument, except to the extent caused by or exacerbated by the activities of the City or its representatives, agents or contractors under this instrument. 5. Warranty of Title. Owner warrants it is the fee owner of the Property and has the right, title, and capacity to convey to the City the Easement herein. 6. Binding Effect. The terms and conditions of this instrument shall run with the land and be binding on the Owner, the City and their respective heirs and assigns. STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: NONE [Signatures on Following Page] 2 48 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner and the City have executed this Easement effective as of the date and year first above written. OWNER: KWS Seeds, LLC f/k/a/ Betaseed, Inc. a Minnesota limited liability company 1325 Valley View Road Shakopee, MN 55379 By: Jossart Title: Corp . rate Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SCOTT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on A9\\ l`� 2026, by John Jossart, Corporate Secretary of KWS Seeds, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of said KWS Seeds, LLC. KAREN LESLIE GRIFFIN 4 NOTARY PUBUG MINNESOTA My CCITIM dse Expires Jsti 31.2030 ► SIGNATURE PAGE TO EASEMENT (Pond Maintenance) 3 49 CITY OF SHAKOPEE By: Matt Lehman Its: Mayor By: William H. Reynolds Its: City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SCOTT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2026, by Matt Lehman and William H. Reynolds the Mayor and City Administrator, respectively, of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, on behalf of the City. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: City of Shakopee Public Works Department 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 952-233-9369 SIGNATURE PAGE TO EASEMENT (Pond Maintenance) 4 50 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, and the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, Section 18, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota; Excepting therefrom the following described parcels: EXCEPTION 1: Commencing at the intersection with the north line of said SW 1/4 of NE 1/4 and the center line of County State Aid Road No. 17; thence West along said north line a distance of 289.24 feet; thence south and parallel to said center line of road a distance of 170 feet; thence east and parallel to said north line a distance of 289.24 feet to the center line of said road; thence north along center line a distance 170 feet, to the point of beginning. EXCEPTION 2: Commencing at the intersection of the North line of said NE 1/4 and the center line of County Road No. 17, said point 1342.6 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof; thence Southerly at an angle of 89 degrees 24 minutes 52 seconds (as measured from East to South) along said center line a distance of 2386.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence deflecting to the West at an angle of 93 degrees 36 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 363.00 feet; thence Southerly parallel with said center line a distance of 120.00 feet; thence Easterly to a point on the center line of County Road No. 17, said point 120.00 feet South of the point of beginning; thence Northerly a distance of 120.00 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPTION 3: That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the North line of said Northeast Quarter and the centerline of County Road No. 17, said point 1342.6 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof; thence Southerly at an angle of 89 degrees 24 minutes 52 seconds (as measured from East to South) along said centerline a distance of 2386.00 feet to the actual point of beginning of the land described; thence deflecting to the West at an angle of 93 degrees 36 minutes a distance of 363.00; thence Southerly parallel with said center line a distance of 120.00 feet; thence deflecting to the West at an angle of 93 degrees 36 minutes a distance of 217.64 feet; thence Northerly parallel with said centerline a distance of 275.00 feet; thence deflecting to the East at an angle of 93 degrees 36 minutes a distance of 634.64 feet to a point on said centerline distant 155.00 feet Northerly of the actual point of beginning; thence Southerly along said center line distance of 155.00 feet to the actual point of beginning. 51 EXCEPTION 4: The West 340.00 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter Section 18, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota. AND The East 90.00 feet of the North 200.00 feet of the West 430.00 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 18, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota. AND The West 340.00 feet of the North 480.05 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, Section 18, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota. EXCEPTION 5: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 18; thence North 02 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds West, an assumed bearing along the east line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 515.00 feet; thence South 87 degrees 57 minutes 11 seconds West, a distance of 66.27 feet; thence North 88 degrees 10 minutes 08 seconds West, a distance of 133.34 feet; thence North 74 degrees 15 minutes 32 seconds West, a distance of 473.47 feet; thence North 86 degrees 14 minutes 29 seconds West, a distance of 344.86 feet; thence North 02 degrees 17 minutes 22 seconds West, a distance of 135.00 feet, to its intersection with a line lying 460.05 feet southerly and parallel with the north line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, thence South 87 degrees 35 minutes 58 seconds West, along said line a distance of 340.00 feet more or less to the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence South 2 degrees 17 minutes 22 seconds East, along said West line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, to the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, thence Easterly along said south line to the point of beginning. Abstract. EXCEPTION 6: That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the north line of said Northeast Quarter and the centerline of County Road No. 17, said point being 1342.6 feet west of the northeast corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence southerly at an angle 52 of 89 degrees 24 minutes 52 seconds (as measured from East to South), along said centerline, 2386.00 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence deflecting to the west at an angle of 93 degrees 36 minutes 363.00 feet; thence southerly, parallel with said centerline, 120.00 feet; thence deflecting to the west 93 degrees 36 minutes 271.64 feet; thence northerly, parallel with said centerline, 275.00 feet; thence deflecting to the east at an angle of 93 degrees 36 minutes 634.64 feet to a point on said centerline distant 155.00 feet northerly of the point of beginning; thence southerly, along said centerline, 155.00 feet to the point of beginning. Which lies easterly of a line described as commencing at the southwest corner of the above described property; thence easterly, along the southerly line of the above described property, 25.73 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northerly deflecting left 106 degrees 48 minutes 11 seconds 88.00 feet; thence northerly deflecting right 10 degrees 05 minutes 31 seconds 10.74 feet; thence northerly deflecting right 3 degrees 06 minutes 39 seconds 145.02 feet; thence northerly deflecting right 1 degrees 12 minutes 32 seconds 34.85 feet to the northerly line of said above described property and said line there terminating. 53 EXHIBIT B Description of Easement Area An easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under and across the following described property: A portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 115 North, Range 22 West, Scott County, Minnesota. The easement area is described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said section and the west line of Scott County Highway No. 17, being also the most southwesterly corner of SCOTT COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO.86; thence North 00 degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds West, assumed bearing, along said west line a distance of 620.85 feet; thence North 00 degrees 01 minutes 59 seconds West, along said west line a distance of 48.36 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds West a distance of 493.66 feet; thence North 45 degrees 00 minutes 04 seconds West a distance of 104.22; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds West a distance of 12.64 feet; thence South 00 degrees 01 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 207.42 feet to the beginning of said easement area to be described; thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 39 seconds East a distance of 149.83 feet; thence South 01 degrees 26 minutes 12 seconds East a distance of 41.54 feet; thence South 69 degrees 42 minutes 51 seconds East a distance of 102.73 feet; thence North 72 degrees 27 minutes 06 seconds East a distance of 55.01 feet; thence North 00 degrees 01 minute 16 seconds West a distance of 60.61 feet to said beginning and there terminating. B-1 54 EXHIBIT C Depiction of Easement Area [See attached] C-1 55 Easement Sketch for: STANLEY & WENCL, LLC .-589'59'56"0 12.64 4ktiq, \ 589`S9'58'w 493.68 b p011It ....gm 5 1 14 .a3 _ 4,„ f N01.241• Y11�+.�1 1.34 mom '1Cw— ' i 60.61 102. "3! 02."3! PROPOSED ORN► AGE - - o AND UTUTY EASEMENT pv In 1rh 2 Malty Mt,/ WM Its • Norte. wr p. pr•Aq n•d ur.r •.l •Y•d wasor•/N•P w [hist IN. • IAr UmI•tl IYW Srre'/or ender O• I•el at 'ft R•h K NWMY•ea drew Ow Mm 0.r d l•ererber, IC?) I R X • ► ASSOCIAT' Gory C 1•.b., Lear Su/r••ra. N'r.sl• . Lan r M. 110 M Mist S+• d SCOTT 001gTT--, MGM 0 Mr RAT No M \ 1 O O II t U 11at►vUstry COW l:17'T' I Sae. In* of re SA I/I o. 1-e'$ I✓ISac. :•, 1 ;:> 1 11 n R UN NOM Mrs. I.RASSOCIATES,Eu u DEylow MN NW Win In �NC. el�40q war�r� d08: 224 —?078.029 C-2 56 EXHIBIT D Annual Inspection Report [See attached] D-1 57 Annual Inspection Report Inspection Year: Name of Site: KWS Seeds, LLC Address:1325 Valley View Road Inspector: Signature Company: Phone: Send Report to: City of Shakopee, Public Works — Engineering, 485 Gorman Street, Shakopee 55379 phone: 952.233.9369 email. engineerinqashakopeemn qov Bioretention/Filtration Facility No. 1 — Operation and Maintenance Checklist Maintenance Item (frequency of inspections and maintenance) Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory Comments 1. Debris Cleanout (Monthly) Contributing drainage areas and facilities clean of litter and vegetative debris No dumping of yard waste into facility Bioretention area clean of litter and vegetative debris 2. Vegetation (Monthly) Plant height taller than design water depth Fertilized per 0 & M plan Plant composition according to 0 & M plan Adequate vegetation density Undesirable vegetation removed Grass height less than 6 inches Mulch layer adequate No evidence of erosion 3. Check Dams/Energy Dissipators/Sumps (Annually, After Major Storms) No evidence of sediment buildup Rip Rap in place and no missing rock Bioretention/Filtration Facility Operation, Maintenance, and Management Inspection Checklist D-2 58 Bioretention/Filtration Facility No. 1 — Operation and Maintenance Checklist (continued Maintenance Item (frequency of inspections and maintenance) Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory Comments Sumps should not be more than 50% full of sediment No evidence of erosion at downstream toe of drop structure 4. Dewatering ( Monthly) Dewaters between storms within 48 hours No evidence of standing water 5. Sediment Deposition (Annually) Pretreatment areas clean of sediments Contributing drainage area stabilized and clear of erosion No evidence of surface clogging Winter sand deposition evacuated every spring 6. Outlet/Overflow Spillway (Annually, After Major Storms) Good condition, no need for repair No evidence of erosion No evidence of any blockages 7. Integrity of Filter Bed (Annually) Facility has not been blocked or filled inappropriately Comments: Actions to be taken. Bioretention/Filtration Facility Operation, Maintenance, and Management Inspection Checklist D-3 59 Underground Treatment/Storage Facility No. 1 — Operation and Maintenance Checklist Maintenance Item (frequency of inspections and maintenance) Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory Comments 1. Debris Cleanout (Monthly) Contributing drainage areas and facilities clean of litter and vegetative debris Trench surface clean Contributing drainage area stabilized and free of erosion Inflow pipes clear Overflow spillway clear Inlet area clean 2. Pretreatment Sediment Trap/Forebay (Twice Annually) Adequately trapping sediment Winter accumulation of sand removed each spring Measure elevation of sediment sumps Precleaning Elevation: Postcleaning Elevation: Sediment Removed: Cubic Yards 3. Dewatering (Monthly) Dewaters between storms as designed per the O&M plan 4. Structure (Annually) Inspect all caps, lids and covers per O & M plan Inspect surface for any obvious cave-in type of issues Inspect and clean all upstream catch basins and manholes Inspect internal components of facility Inspect facilities inlet and outlet 5. Sediment Cleanout of facility (Annually) No evidence of sediment in filter (if present) No evidence of sediment accumulation (remove as necessary) Sediment Removed: Cubic Yards D-4 60 Underground Treatment/Storage Facility Operation, Maintenance, and Management Inspection Checklist Underground Treatment/Storage Facility No. 1 — Operation and Maintenance Checklist continued Maintenance Item (frequency of inspections and maintenance) Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory Comments 7. Inlets (Annually) Good condition No evidence of erosion 8. Outlet/Overflow Spillway (Annually) Good condition, no need for repair No evidence of erosion Comments: Actions to be taken: Underground Treatment/Storage Facility Operation, Maintenance, and Management Inspection Checklist 4925-3396-4962, v 2 D-5 61 UTILITY FACILITIES EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS UTILITY FACILITIES EASEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Easement Agreement") is given on , 2026 by KWS Seeds, LLC (f/k/a Betaseed, Inc.), a Minnesota limited liability company ("Owner"), to CITY OF SHAKOPEE, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), in accordance with the following: 1. Ownership. Owner is the fee owner of the property legally described on attached Exhibit A ("Property"). 2. Grant of Easement. For valuable consideration, Owner conveys to the City an easement over, under and across that portion of the Property described in Exhibit B attached hereto (the "Easement Area") for the purpose of maintaining, repairing and replacing the Utility Facilities, as hereinafter defined, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 3. Scope of Easement Rights. The Easement Agreement includes the right of the City, its contractors, employees, agents and assigns to: a. reasonable right of ingress and egress to inspect the Utility Facilities pursuant to Section 5 hereof; b. reasonable right of ingress and egress to perform the Owner's Obligations within the Easement Area upon default by Owner pursuant to Section 5 hereof; c. locate, construct, reconstruct, operate, maintain, inspect, alter and repair the Utility Facilities within the Easement Area in accordance with Section 5 hereof; and d. cut, trim, or remove trees, shrubs, or other vegetation within the Easement Area that in the City's judgment unreasonably interfere with the Utility Facilities. 62 4. Owner's Obligations. The Owner has constructed its private water, sanitary sewer and stormwater facilities, which connect to the City's public facilities, as depicted in Exhibit C (the "Utility Facilities"), a full size original of which is on file with the Shakopee City Engineer. The Owner will maintain the Utility Facilities and any other required utility improvements reasonably approved by the City. 5. Enforcement. 5.1. After reasonable advance written notice to Owner, City may enter the Property for the purposes of inspection of the Utility Facilities and enforcement of the obligations of Owner under this Easement Agreement. If Owner fails to perform its obligations under this Easement Agreement, the City must provide written notice of default to Owner before taking any corrective action. If the failure continues for 30 days after the City's written notice, the City may take whatever actions it deems reasonably necessary in order to fulfill the obligations of Owner under this Easement Agreement. If it is determined by the City that it is an emergency and is necessary to enter the Property to maintain or repair any of the Utility Facilities to protect public utility facilities or the public health, safety or welfare without first giving such notice to the Owner, it may do so, giving the Owner such notice as is reasonably possible under the circumstances. Owner must reimburse the City for the reasonable out-of- pocket costs incurred by the City for its corrective action within 30 days after receipt by Owner of a written demand from the City accompanied by reasonable documentation of the expenses. If Owner fails to reimburse the City within the 30 -day period prescribed above, the City may recover its costs by assessing the amounts against the Property to be collected with property taxes. Owner waives all rights that it might have to receive notice and a hearing or to contest these assessments. Further, City may enforce the terms of this Easement Agreement by any proceeding in law or in equity to restrain violation, to compel compliance, or to recover damages, including attorneys' fees and costs of the enforcement actions. The Owner is not liable for the actions of any third party, other than its employees, agents, or contractors, that may violate the terms of this Easement Agreement unless the Owner, its employees, agents, or contractors had actual knowledge of the violation and failed to take reasonable action to attempt to stop the violation. 5.2. Failure to enforce any provision of this Easement Agreement upon a violation of it will not be deemed a waiver of the right to do so as to that or any subsequent violation. 5.3. Invalidation of any of the terms of this Easement Agreement will in no way affect any of the other terms, which will remain in full force and effect. 6. Duration of Easements. This Easement Agreement is permanent and remains in effect in perpetuity. 7. Warranty of Grantor. The Owner warrants that it is the owner of a fee simple interest in the Property, that it has the right to grant this Easement Agreement, and that the Property is free and clear of any lien, encumbrance, easement, restriction, covenant or 2 63 condition, except for those filed of record with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles for Scott County, Minnesota. 8. Easement Runs with Land. This Easement Agreement runs with the land and is binding on the City, the Owner, their respective successors and assigns. 9. Amendments. This Easement Agreement may not be amended without the written approval of both parties. (Signatures on following pages) 3 64 KWS See• ;, LLC f/k/a Betaseed, Inc. By: Jo Its: Co'.orat'Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SCOTT ) T e forging instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2026, by John Jossart, Corporate Secretary of KWS Seeds, LLC, a sota limite •`iabi i. com � y, on b . allof the company. Notary Public KAREN LESLIE GRIFFIN NOTARY PUf3LIC &tINNESO WN Corm izion ER*63 Jrt St, 2030 ► STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) THE CITY: City of Shakopee By: (Print Name) Its: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2026, by , of the City of Shakopee, a municipal corporation, on behalf of the City. Notary Public 4 65 CITY OF SHAKOPEE By: Matt Lehman Its: Mayor By: William H. Reynolds Its: City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SCOTT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2026, by Matt Lehman and William H. Reynolds the Mayor and City Administrator, respectively, of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, on behalf of the City. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: City of Shakopee Public Works Department 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 952-233-9369 5 66 EXHIBIT A Description of Parcel The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, and the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, Section 18, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota; Excepting therefrom the following described parcels: EXCEPTION I: Commencing at the intersection with the north line of said SW 1/4 of NE 1/4 and the center line of County State Aid Road No. 17; thence West along said north line a distance of 289.24 feet; thence south and parallel to said center line of road a distance of 170 feet; thence east and parallel to said north line a distance of 289.24 feet to the center line of said road; thence north along center line a distance 170 feet, to the point of beginning. EXCEPTION 2: Commencing at the intersection of the North line of said NE 1/4 and the center line of County Road No. 17, said point 1342.6 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof; thence Southerly at an angle of 89 degrees 24 minutes 52 seconds (as measured from East to South) along said center line a distance of 2386.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence deflecting to the West at an angle of 93 degrees 36 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 363.00 feet; thence Southerly parallel with said center line a distance of 120.00 feet; thence Easterly to a point on the center line of County Road No. 17, said point 120.00 feet South of the point of beginning; thence Northerly a distance of 120.00 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPTION 3: That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the North line of said Northeast Quarter and the centerline of County Road No. 17, said point 1342.6 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof; thence Southerly at an angle of 89 degrees 24 minutes 52 seconds (as measured from East to South) along said centerline a distance of 2386.00 feet to the actual point of beginning of the land described; thence deflecting to the West at an angle of 93 degrees 36 minutes a distance of 363.00; thence Southerly parallel with said center line a distance of 120.00 feet; thence deflecting to the West at an angle of 93 degrees 36 minutes a distance of 217.64 feet; thence Northerly parallel with said centerline a distance of 275.00 feet; thence deflecting to the East at an angle of 93 degrees 36 minutes a distance of 634.64 feet to a point on said centerline distant 155.00 feet Northerly of the actual point of beginning; thence Southerly along said center line distance of 155.00 feet to the actual A-1 67 point of beginning. EXCEPTION 4: The West 340.00 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter Section 18, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota. AND The East 90.00 feet of the North 200.00 feet of the West 430.00.feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 18, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota. AND The West 340.00 feet of the North 480.05 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, Section 18, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota. EXCEPTION 5: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 18; thence North 02 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds West, an assumed bearing along the east line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 515.00 feet; thence South 87 degrees 57 minutes 11 seconds West, a distance of 66.27 feet; thence North 88 degrees 10 minutes 08 seconds West, a distance of 133.34 feet; thence North 74 degrees 15 minutes 32 seconds West, a distance of 473.47 feet; thence North 86 degrees 14 minutes 29 seconds West, a distance of 344.86 feet; thence North 02 degrees 17 minutes 22 seconds West, a distance of 135.00 feet, to its intersection with a line lying 460.05 feet southerly and parallel with the north line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, thence South 87 degrees 35 minutes 58 seconds West, along said line a distance of 340.00 feet more or less to the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence South 2 degrees 17 minutes 22 seconds East, along said West line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, to the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, thence Easterly along said south line to the point of beginning. Abstract. EXCEPTION 6: That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows: A-2 68 Commencing at the intersection of the north line of said Northeast Quarter and the centerline of County Road No. 17, said point being 1342.6 feet west of the northeast corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence southerly at an angle of 89 degrees 24 minutes 52 seconds (as measured from East to South), along said centerline, 2386.00 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence deflecting to the west at an angle of 93 degrees 36 minutes 363.00 feet; thence southerly, parallel with said centerline, 120.00 feet; thence deflecting to the west 93 degrees 36 minutes 271.64 feet; thence northerly, parallel with said centerline, 275.00 feet; thence deflecting to the east at an angle of 93 degrees 36 minutes 634.64 feet to a point on said centerline distant 155.00 feet northerly of the point of beginning; thence southerly, along said centerline, 155.00 feet to the point of beginning. Which lies easterly of a line described as commencing at the southwest corner of the above described property; thence easterly, along the southerly line of the above described property, 25.73 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northerly deflecting left 106 degrees 48 minutes 11 seconds 88.00 feet; thence northerly deflecting right 10 degrees 05 minutes 31 seconds 10.74 feet; thence northerly deflecting right 3 degrees 06 minutes 39 seconds 145.02 feet; thence northerly deflecting right 1 degrees 12 minutes 32 seconds 34.85 feet to the northerly line of said above described property and said line there terminating. A-3 69 EXHIBIT B Description of Easement Area [insert description of utility lines in question here] B-1 70 #1 SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT DESCRIPTION A 30 foot wide easement for utility purposes over, under and across the following described property: The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 115 North, Range 22 West, Scott County, Minnesota. The centerline of said easement is described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the south right-of-way line of Olive Road and the east right- of-way line of Weston Lane; thence North 00 degrees 09 minutes 41 seconds East, along a west line of said portion of Section 18 and said east right-of-way line of Weston Lane, 31.30 feet to the point of beginning of said centerline to be described; thence South 89 degrees 52 minutes 05 seconds East 33.54; thence South 54 degrees 24 minutes 53 seconds East 232.33 feet and the centerline there terminating. B-2 71 #2 STORMWATER EASEMENT DESCRIPTION A 20 foot wide easement for utility purposes over, under and across the following described property: The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 115 North, Range 22 West, Scott County, Minnesota. The first centerline of said easement is described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said section and the west line of Scott County Highway No. 17, being also the most southwesterly corner of SCOTT COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO.86; thence North 00 degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds West, assumed bearing, along said west line a distance of 620.85 feet; thence North 00 degrees 01 minutes 59 seconds West, along said west line, 48.36 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds West 493.66 feet; thence North 45 degrees 00 minutes 04 seconds West 104.22 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds West 12.64 feet; thence South 00 degrees 01 minutes 16 seconds East 207.42 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point A"; thence South 89 degrees 58 minutes 39 seconds West 101.70 feet to the beginning of the first centerline to be described; thence North 05 degrees 11 minutes 32 seconds West 514.81 feet; thence North 83 degrees 29 minutes 03 seconds East 92.43 feet; thence South 85 degrees 00 minutes 25 seconds East 145.48 feet and said first centerline there terminating. The second centerline of the easement is described as follows: Commencing at said "Point A"; thence South 00 degrees 01 minute 16 seconds East 60.61 feet; thence South 72 degrees 27 minutes 06 seconds West 55.01 feet; thence North 69 degrees 42 minutes 51 seconds West 70.10 feet to the beginning of said second centerline to be described; thence South 28 degrees 26 minutes 48 seconds West 7.09 feet; thence South 57 degrees 10 minutes 21 seconds West 108.24 and the second centerline there terminating. B-3 72 #3 WATERMAIN EASEMENT DESCRIPTION A 20 foot easement for utility purposes over, under and across the following described property: The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 115 North, Range 22 West, Scott County, Minnesota. The centerline of said easement is described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said section and the west line of Scott County Highway No. 17, being also the most southwesterly corner of SCOTT COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO.86; thence North 00 degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds West, assumed bearing, along said west line a distance of 620.85 feet; thence North 00 degrees 01 minute 59 seconds West, along the west line, 48.36 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds West 493.66 feet; thence North 45 degrees 00 minutes 04 seconds West 104.22 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds West 205.44 feet; thence North 45 degrees 00 minutes 04 seconds West 48.49 feet; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 260.57; thence North 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 58.05 feet to the beginning of said centerline to be described; thence South 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 7.30 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds East 199.90 feet; thence South 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 7.30 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 50.89 feet and there terminating. B-4 73 EXHIBIT C Depiction of Utility Facilities (2 pages) f See attached depictions] C-1 74 ,to Easement Sketch for: KWS SEED, INC. DESCRIPTION A 30 foot wide eeesmint for WRY Ovpoea ow, under anti woes the falbwirp deloised property: The Southwest Quarter of the North est Quarter of Section 1e, Townahb 115 North. Range 22 West, Scott Cavity, Minnesota. The certoer Inv of sap easement Is riescrltratl es lapows: Commencing at the Intersection of the south rightd-wry IMe of olive aped end the met right-of-way lie of Wanton Lane: thence North 00 decrees 09 minutes 41 seconds east, atonic a west One of said portion of Section is end isle cut right-of-way line of Weston Lane, 31.30 feet to the point of beglrvthp of sad centerline to be described; thence South 99 degrees 52 n entRN OS words East 33.54; them! Sarni 54 degrees 24 mimeos S3 seconds East 232.33 feet and the centerline the terminellna. I -A _ J %I' - :•5893?'OS'E OLIVE :— :,- 1.1 54 00'D9'41'E.- , - ' \ f 31.30 —• \N• \\ �! NS \ \\ vs • t \-J\\\ 4( ' • gF% : • a r I - . 0 g ,, , • ,?r4, o i c aJ • • • •J CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this sketch was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under Cie laws of the State of Minnesota. RENDER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Dated this 16th day of April, 2026 t,. tarar. I lay t....,.. RENDERI. y.r��.�ly _ wru i ASSOCIATES, INC- .a"`a "a"..' JOB: 234-2978.029 C-2 75 Easement Sketch for: KWS SEED, INC. DESCRIPTION A 20 foot easement for utility purposes over, under and woes the following described property: _J OLIVE ROAD w J^ ?G: S<St70'00'E 730 •S45'00'00'E Yl �- ---- 730 82 / r- s89'59'56'E 199 90 -'�� , i s 11 r. SOCK 9 'E LrJh h �LUUiJJJ t Y -p / ,e II •1 Nc. 20544 •;. ,(I., _ i.! •ti \. 4 - • S8959'56'W 49.)66 { m 2 ',- -----, di► I„ r 1 , (•....i The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 115 North, Range 22 West, Scott County, Minnesota. The centerline of said easement Is described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said section and the west line of Scott County Highway No. 17, being also the most southwesterly corner of SCOTT COUNTY MGM OF WAY PLAT NO.86; thence North 00 degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds West, assumed bearing, along said west line a distance of 620.85 feet; thence North 00 degrees 01 minute 59 seconds West, along the west line, 48.36 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds West 493.66 feet; thence North 45 degrees 00 minutes 04 seconds West 104.22 feet; t once South 89 degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds West 205.44 het; thence North 45 degrees 00 minutes 04 seconds West 48.49 teet; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 260.57; thence North 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 58.05 het to the beginning of said centerline to be described; thence South 4S cegrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 7.30 het; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds East 199.90 feet; thence South 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 7.30 feet; thence South 00 cegrees 00 mlrutes 00 seconds East 50.89 feet and there terminating. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this scetch was prepared by ma or under my direct supervision and that lam a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. RENDER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Dated this 16th day of April, 2026 0 :"mC t R.Z Fes. Sa.t- eueAy cOnvo of SCOTT-, Q :DJM'• •':J.1 D. MA. r.At •1o. se 8 2 sov:nit..dw.sw1Jadu.- Ht ;N d Set. 11 T. L IS, 1. 22 N8955'21'W 112.81r :c„7,.rt ; o•••.• d t•. Sit 1.4 d •J tee PIE I/4 Of Sec. 15, T. L I S, 5. 22 REHDER Minnesota llcense`No 63458 I i ASSOCIATES, Mat{hew 0. Thiel, land Surveyor INC. [M fwoof • 5 , see Ione, . low. wking w• Mil •I0 se IOW y.r., evem+ evelanst. re .IO& 234-2978.029 C-3 76 #3 Easement Sketch for: KWS SEED, INC. DESCRIPTION A 20 foot Ales eesemex for utility purpowe over, osier and across the following desafesd property: The Southwest Quarter o1 the Northeast Quarter of Seaton 18, Township 115 North, Range 22 West, Scott County, Minnesota. The first centerline of said easement Is described es follows: Communing at the Intersection of the south line of saw Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Qurter of said wctton and We west hie of Scott County highway No. 17, beep also the most sourAerenrty corner of SCOTT COUNTY RUG1fT Of WAY PLAT No.66; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 30 seconds West, assumed Ousting, slang said west line a distance of 620.85 feet; therms North 00 dagrles 01 rnInuoas 59 seconds West, along said wet line, 48.36 Net; Mence South 69 degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds Wert •93.66 feet; thence North 45 degrees 00 minutes 04 wounds West 104.22 het; thence South 89 degrees 59 mimeses 56 seconds West 12.64 feat; thence Sown 00 dspnaes 01 minutes 16 ascends east 207.42 feet b a pope nrsiasitr rufwred to es 'Point A'; thence South 89 degrees S8 mimeos 39 seconds West 101.70 hat to use beginning et the first centerline to be desatgeC; thence North DS degrees I I minutes 32 seconds West 514.81 feet; thence North 83 degrees 29 mantes 03 seconds East 92.43 feet; thence South 85 degrees 00 minutes 25 seconds fast 145.48 feat and said first contains there trminadrng. The second centerline of the easement is described as follows: Commenting at said "Print A"; thence South 00 degrees 01 minute 16 seconds East 60.61 feet; thence Soutn 72 degrees 27 'rV^uses 06 seconds hest 55.01 feet, thence Aorta 69 [egrets 42 mlrutes S1 seconds West 70 10 feet to the Daglrwing of stud second (e^trihe to be descrtxd. twice South 28 degrees 26 m1n„tes 49 seconds west 709 feet; tre^ce South Si degree 10 minutes 21 seconds West 108.24 and the second centerline there terminating. -i r: • -1•-sus vo is F. --3 '20 c__.:11 '.' 145.4, I3 8 2t7 I , I r:_<S89'59.56-1V 12.61 h n t+. II -III �h I '. \'t° p; 4 N :I 1 I ray, I $.�'-' Z \4. 'n I' I Z I N \4z S89'S9'56"W 493.66 - 1 Q S rill Y 1 i Q i� „� I I N R3 ZIII i! I _ d x ...,,,-......„....„_•...\\ �•., I I I P l::.rt 0, wAY ►•pt MG. IS ,, ` I 8 � I T _)'.icLS89'8 .39.14 I %O:::- , I . r ''' Sled r .. Point 'A' .r' sho ` (� .t'..-�,• ; d SOO0. 16"E' r' ,, r n 'Qi �' 60.61 I r ',,' 0 ► ,- r• SoVtn.ewuM corer a s tt h p O t� • r COIN rY erG$' Of *AV A HO. \ I : A 1 2 ce r' sronimse es Ammons-\ 1/4 al lac. l a, T. t L>V a. 221O A-‘ tn CERTIFICATION I48p+,5311'W 172.x► -:-•"7 I hereby certify Wet t is sketch was prepared by me or under my direct 6tebervIslon and that I am a duly Udsnsed Land Surveyor under the laws a tine State of MInnesota. RENDER 11 ASSOCIATES, INC Dated this 16th day of April, 2026 Sc.tnaast cons.* err the Sw 114 0---/ the ‘t 114 a sec le. 7. 11S, 72 RENDER 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. IMO kind MN YIN 00 _.O _--- JOB: 234-2978.029 C-4 77 THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered Suite 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (CLL) (612) 337-9300 4913-8130-1917, v. 3 78 WILLA! SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.g May 19, 2026 Award Contract for the Shenandoah Drive and Schenian Street Intersection Improvements Alex Jordan, City Engineer Alex Jordan, City Engineer Action to be considered: Adopt Resolution R2026-078, accepting bids and awarding a contract in the amount of $1,146,895.00 to S.M. Hentges and Sons, Inc. for the Shenandoah Drive and Schenian Street Intersection Improvements, CIF -26-011. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: The adopted Canterbury Commons Areawide Transportation Assessment (2018) included the recommendation of a roundabout at the Shenandoah Drive and Schenian Street intersection, based on land use access and adjacent development. Canterbury Park Entertainment (Canterbury) has made significant development progress in this area, including multiple restaurants, high density housing and office space. In addition to the completed projects, Canterbury continues to explore opportunities for hotel and entertainment space along the track, which would be accessed by the existing private roadway at this intersection. In response to the operational and safety needs based on the existing traffic and forecasted growth from development, the City and Canterbury recommend initiating the recommended roundabout improvements. The proposed improvements include construction of a single lane roundabout at the Shenandoah Drive and Schenian Street intersection. In accordance with Minnesota Statute Section 471.345 Uniform Municipal Contracting Law, bids were solicited and opened May 13, 2026. Six bids were received and S.M. Hentges and Sons, Inc. from Jordan, Minnesota, was the low bidder in the amount of $1,146,895.00 (see attached resolution for the bid tabulation summary). S.M. Hentges and Sons, Inc. has the capacity and experience for the project and is deemed a responsible bidder. Construction is anticipated to begin early September and be completed November of 2026. The construction schedule has been delayed to the fall to avoid 79 significant traffic impacts from the adjacent Mystic Lake Ampitheater. Recommendation: Adopt Resolution R2026-078 Budget Impact: Based on the low bid amount, the total estimated project cost is as follows: Engineer's Estimate Estimate Based on Bid Award COSTS Construction Cost (bid contract) $ 1,165,000.00 $ 1,146,895.00 Lighting and Irrigation $ 125,000.00 $ 125,000.00 Contingency $ 60,000.00 $ 57,344.75 Subtotal $ 1,350,000.00 $ 1,329,239.75 Engineering, Legal, Administration $ 350,000.00 $ 328,011.85 Total Estimated Project Cost $ 1,700,000.00 $ 1,657,251.60 FUNDING Canterbury Commons Development TIF $ 700,000.00 $ 657,620.39 Canterbury Park Cost Sharing $ 1,000,000.00 $ 999,631.21 Total Funding $ 1,700,000.00 $ 1,657,251.60 The total project budget of $1,657,251.60 includes a contingency amount that covers any unexpected change orders, quantity adjustments and other miscellaneous expenses encountered as part of the project. The project will be funded by the Canterbury Commons Development Tax Increment Fund with cost sharing by Canterbury. A Cost Sharing Agreement with Canterbury will be brought to the City Council for approval at a future meeting. Attachments: 80 R2026-078.docx Contract.pdf 81 RESOLUTION R2026-078 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,146,895.00 TO S.M. HENTGES & SONS, INC., FOR THE SHENANDOAH DRIVE AND SCHENIAN STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, CIF -26-011 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Shenandoah Drive and Schenian Street Intersections Improvements, CIF -26-011, bids were received, opened on May 13, 2026, and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Bidder S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. Pember Companies, Inc. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Minger Construction Co. Inc. JLTheis, Inc. Urban Companies Amount $ 1,146,895.00 $ 1,252,414.30 $ 1,355,889.40 $ 1,397,036.20 $ 1,563,938.20 $ 1,720,231.44 WHEREAS, S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc., 650 Quaker Avenue, Jordan, MN 55352, is the lowest responsible bidder for the Shenandoah Drive and Schenian Street Intersections Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: 1. The appropriate City officials are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc., in the name of the City of Shakopee for the Shenandoah Drive and Schenian Street Intersections Improvements according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. 3. Pursuant to Section 1.150-2(d) of the Treasury Regulations, the City Council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvements from the proceeds of tax-exempt bonds. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 19th day of May 2026. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Prepared by: City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 82 NOTICE OF AWARD FOR SHENANDOAH DR ROUNDABOUT NO. CIF -26-011 CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA TO: S.M Hentges & Sons, Inc. 650 Quaker Avenue Jordan, MN 55352 The City of Shakopee, Minnesota, having considered the proposals submitted May 13, 2026 for the construction of the Shenandoah Dr Roundabout, Project CIF -26-011, and it appearing that your proposal is fair, equitable and to the best interest of the City, the said proposal is hereby accepted for the prices set forth therein. In accordance with the terms of the Contract Documents, you are required to execute the formal Contract Agreement and furnish the required Performance and Payment Bond within ten (10) days from the date hereof. The Bid Security submitted with your proposal will be returned upon execution of the Contract Agreement and the furnishing of the Performance and Payment Bond. In the event you should fail to execute the Contract Agreement and furnish the Performance and Payment Bond, within the time limit specified, said Bid Security will be retained by the City of Shakopee as liquidated damages for failure to accept the award and execute the necessary documents for the formation of the contract. The City is accepting Alternate No. CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Bill Reynolds/ City Administrator Awarded by: Shakopee City Council May 19, 2026 Contract Amount: $1,146,895.00 Shenandoah Dr Roundabout Project No. CIF -26-011 Project Specifications Contract C-1 83 CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into this 19 day of May , 2026 by and between S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. hereinafter called "Contractor" (a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota) (a partnership consisting of created under the laws of Minnesota), and the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "City." WITNESSETH: That Whereas, the Contractor has become the lowest responsible bidder for furnishing the supervision, labor, tools, equipment, materials and supplies and for constructing the following City improvements: Shenandoah Dr Roundabout NOW THEREFORE, the parties to this contract agree to the following: 1. Manner for Completion The Contractor, at his own proper cost and expense, shall perform all work and furnish all supervision (needed beyond that provided by the City Engineer), labor, material, tools, supplies, machinery and other equipment necessary for the construction of the Shenandoah Dr Roundabout, Project CIF -26-011 for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, in a workmanlike and substantial manner, as outlined in the Plans and Specifi- cations. 2. Due Diligence Time is of the essence in the performance of this Contract. The maintenance of a rate of progress in the work which will result in its completion in a reasonable time, is an essential feature of this Contract, and the Contractor agrees to proceed with all due diligence and care, at all times to take all precautions to insure the time of completion as defined in this Contract. The Contractor shall fully complete the work called for under the Contract in accordance with the specifications. 3. Payment The City will pay the Contractor those prices stipulated in the Contractor's Contract Proposal, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Contract, which shall constitute full and complete compensation for the contractor's work provided hereunder. The parties specifically agree and understand and the Contractor specifically waives any claim for additional compensation for any changed condition whether arising out of a physical condition at the site of an unusual nature, differing materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character and at the location provided for in the Contract or arising as a result of any force majeur. 4. Prevailing Wages If this project is funded in whole or in part by state funds, then the wages of laborers, workers, and mechanics should be comparable to wages paid for similar work in the community as a whole, as established by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry. If this section applies to this project, the prevailing wage rates are attached and included in the contract documents. Shenandoah Dr Roundabout Project No. CIF -26-011 Project Specifications Contract C-2 84 5. Contractor's Responsibility for Subcontractors It is further agreed that Contractor shall be as fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as Contractor is for the acts and omissions of persons it directly employs. Contractor shall cause appropriate provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts relating to this work, to bind all subcontractors to Contractor by all the terms herein set forth, insofar as applicable to the work of subcontractors and to give Contractor the same power regarding termination of any subcontract as the City may exercise over Contractor under any provisions of this contract. Nothing contained in this Contract shall create any contractual relation between the subcontractor and the City or between any subcontractors. 6. Payment to Subcontractors The Contractor shall pay any subcontractor within ten days of receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. If the Contractor fails to pay within ten days, the Contractor shall pay the subcontractor interest at the rate of one and one-half percent per month or part of month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor, in accordance with Minn. State. Sec. 471.425, Subd. 4a. 7. City Instructions The City may declare the contract forfeited as described in the Standard Specifications should the Contractor persistently disregard instructions of the City or fail to observe or perform any provisions of this Contract. 8. Indemnity The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, and save the City harmless from and against all claims, suits and actions of every description, brought against the City and from all damage and costs, including attorney's and expert fees, by reason or on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person or persons, or their property, by Contractor, its servants, agents or subcontractors in the construction of said work, or by any negligence or carelessness in the performance of same, or on account of any other wrongful act or omission, including breach of any provision of this Contract, of Contractor, its independent subcontractors, agents, employees, or delegates. The Contractor further agrees to indemnify the City for defense cost incurred in defending any claims, unless the City is determined to be at fault. 9. Contract Documents This Contract, together with the other documents enumerated in this paragraph, forms the Contract between the parties. These documents are as fully a part of the contract as if attached hereto or repeated herein. In the event of any conflict between those documents listed as (a) through (f), they shall govern in the order listed, with this Contract governing over all other documents. The contract documents consist of the following: a. This Contract b. All Change Orders or Addenda c. Plans and Specifications for Project CIF -26-011 d. General Utility and Street Improvement Specifications for Construction e. Shakopee Public Utility Commission Water Policy Manual f. All items listed under the Table of Contents 10. Duplicate Originals This Contract shall be executed in two copies; one (1) copy being retained by the City, one (1) to be delivered to the Contractor. Shenandoah Dr Roundabout Project No. CIF -26-011 Project Specifications Contract C-3 85 11. Nondiscrimination The Contractor agrees in the performance of this Contract not to discriminate on the ground or because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation or age, against any employee of Contractor or applicant for employment, and shall include a similar provision in all subcontracts let or awarded hereunder. 12. Jurisdiction This agreement and every question arising hereunder shall be construed or determined according to the laws of the State of Minnesota. 13. Contract Times The work will be substantially complete on or before November 7, 2026 and completed and ready for final payment in accordance with Paragraph 15.06 of the General Conditions on or before June 12, 2027. Contractor may not start work requiring traffic control changes at intersection of Shenandoah Dr & Schenian St until after September 7, 2026. CONTRACTOR CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA By By Mayor/Matt Lehman By By Name / Title City Administrator/William H. Reynolds Approved as to form: City Attorney Shenandoah Dr Roundabout Project No. CIF -26-011 Project Specifications Contract C-4 86 PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that We, , as Principal, and as Surety, being a corporation certified by the Minnesota Commissioner of Insurance and authorized to act as a surety as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 60A.23, Subd. 5 and 574.15, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Shakopee, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter called the City, for the use of the City and to all subcontractors and persons who have furnished or shall furnish materials actually used in the performance of the hereinafter mentioned Contract, or who have performed, or shall perform, labor in the performance of or in connection with the said Contract in the penal sum of ($ ), lawful money of the United States of America, the payment of which will truly be made to the Obligees, the said Principals and the said surety, bind themselves and each of their heirs, exe- cutors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents as follows: The condition of the above obligation is such that: WHEREAS, the above bounded Principals have heretofore on the day of , 2026, entered into a written Contract, a copy of which is by reference made a part hereof, with said City, for the furnishing of all labor and equipment for the complete installation of the Shenandoah Dr Roundabout, Project CIF - 26 -011, said construction work to be done according to the requirements of said Contract. NOW, THEREFORE, the obligations shall remain in full force and effect unless and until the above Principals do the following: • At all times duly, promptly, and faithfully perform said Contract and any alteration in or addition to the obligations of said Principals arising thereunder (including the matter of infringement, if any, of patents), • Guarantee all work against defective workmanship and materials for a period of two (2) years from date of final acceptance by the City, • Comply with all the covenants contained in the specification drawings and other documents constituting a part of said Contract required to be performed by said Principals, • Satisfy all claims and demands for same, in the manner and within the times provided in said Contract, • Fully indemnify and save harmless the City of Shakopee from all costs and damage which the City may suffer, • Fully reimburse and repay the City all outlay and expenses which the City may incur in making good any defaults, and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in the prosecution of or defense of any action arising out of or in connection with any such default, • Pay all people who have contracts directly with the Principals, for labor or materials, if any, included in said Contract, or any alteration in or addition thereto. Shenandoah Dr Roundabout Project No. CIF -26-011 Project Specifications Contract C-5 87 If the Principals fulfill the above -listed items, then this obligation may become null and void. The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration in or addition to the terms of the Contract, the work to be performed thereunder, or specifications accompanying the same, and no forbearance on the part of either the City or the Principal, shall in any way affect its obligation in this bond or release the Principal and Surety or either of them, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns from their liability hereunder. The Surety hereby waives notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract, the work to be performed thereunder, or the specifications, or any forbearance. Signed and sealed this day of , 2026. Principal By Surety Address By Attorney -in -fact Local Agent Address Shenandoah Dr Roundabout Project No. CIF -26-011 Project Specifications Contract C-6 88 NOTICE TO PROCEED FOR SHENANDOAH DR ROUNDABOUT PROJECT NO. CIF -26-011 CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA TO: S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. 650 Quaker Ave. Jordan, MN 55352 DATE: You are hereby authorized to proceed on this date for the construction of the Shenandoah Dr Roundabout, Project CIF -26-011 for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota as set forth in detail in the Contract Documents, including Plans and Specifications. CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA By: City Engineer We have determined the following permits are required: If you will not complete your work involving these permits within the time specified thereon, you should communicate with the Director of Public Works, City of Shakopee, Minnesota to see if an extension is available and what you must do to obtain one. If you encounter other permits required, please communicate immediately with the same department. Shenandoah Dr Roundabout Project No. CIF -26-011 Project Specifications Contract C-7 89 WILLA! SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.h May 19, 2026 Accept Xcel Energy's Community Benefit Contribution Donation Andrea Harrell, Grants and Special Projects Coordinator Chelsea Petersen, Assistant City Administrator Action to be considered: Adopt Resolution R2026-080, accepting a monetary donation from Xcel Energy. Motion Type: Two -Thirds Vote Background: The City of Shakopee has been in contact with Xcel Energy regarding the Blue Lake Battery Energy Storage System project to discuss the project's impact as a requirement of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission's permitting process. While a formal Community Benefit Agreement typically provides the impacts a project will have on the community and the plans and financial details on offsetting those impacts, this project is not expected to have any negative impacts. Additionally, Xcel Energy has proposed a one-time donation of $10,000 to be allocated to the Shakopee Fire Department to be used for public safety purposes. The City plans to utilize the $10,000 donation to replace a portion of the Fire Department's aging AEDs. The City of Shakopee's donation policy requires a 2/3 vote to accept cash donations over $1,000.00 and donations of real property. Recommendation: Adopt Resolution R2026-080. Budget Impact: The donation eliminates the future expense of purchasing the AEDs from the Fire Department's Equipment Budget. Attachments: Resolution R2026-080.docx 90 RESOLUTION R2026-080 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA ACCEPTING A DONATION FROM XCEL ENERGY WHEREAS, on November 6, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5794, which established procedure relating to the receipt of gifts and donations by the City, and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 5794 specifies that cash donations over $1,000 and donations of real property shall be accepted by resolution of the City Council, and shall require a two-thirds majority of the Council for acceptance, and WHEREAS, Xcel Energy is generously donating $10,000 to support public safety, and WHEREAS, such a donation will help the Fire Department purchase updated AEDs, and WHEREAS, this donation will enhance the overall quality of life in Shakopee, and be valued by and beneficial to residents, visitors, and employees of the City of Shakopee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA that the donation is gratefully accepted; and FURTHER, the donation shall be used for Public Safety purposes, consistent with the wishes of the donor, and FURTHER, the City staff is directed to send a letter to the donor, acknowledging receipt of the gift and expressing the appreciation of the City Council. Adopted in the regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 19th day of May 2026. Matt Lehman, Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Richard Parsons City Clerk 91 SHAKOPEE WILLA! Shakopee City Council 5.i May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: Surplus Property Prepared by: Josh Davis, Sergeant Reviewed by: Action to be considered: Declare one vehicle and one firearm as surplus property and authorize disposal. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: The following vehicle was obtained through forfeiture proceedings and is described as follows: 1. 2009 Volvo $60, VIN #YV1RH 592092737650 The vehicle is not suitable for resale and will be junked. The following firearm was obtained through forfeiture proceedings and is described as follows: 1. Winchester Model 270, .22 Caliber Rifle The firearm will be destroyed. Recommendation: Approve policy/action as requested. Budget Impact: None. Attachments: 92 WI"LAI SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.j May 19, 2026 Award of Bid on Police Department Boiler Replacement Chelsea Petersen, Assistant City Administrator Action to be considered: Adopt Resolution No. 2026-081 accepting bids and awarding a contract in the amount of $156,000 to True Mechanical. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: The boilers in the Police Department have exceeded their expected useful life and are in need of replacement. The current boilers are very large and original to the building, and due to changes in technology and efficiency can be replaced with fewer, smaller, and more efficient units. The current facility will be undergoing a facility and departmental needs assessment this year, so if it is determined that additional units are needed there will be space for additional equipment in the existing boiler room. Bids were solicited and received from three companies, and True Mechanical was found to be low bidder on the project, and also has the expertise and capacity for this project. Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2026-081 accepting bids and awarding a contract in the amount of $156,000 to True Mechanical. Budget Impact: This project was originally combined with the A/C condenser unit and projected to be $250,000. The A/C condenser unit has been in better working order and will be incorporated into future facility plans at a later date. The Building Internal Service fund has adequate funds for this project. Attachments: R2026-081 CIP BA -26-009 93 RESOLUTION R2026-081 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AWARDING A CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $156,000 TO TRUE MECHANICAL FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF FOUR EXISTING BOILERS, AT THE SHAKOPEE POLICE DEPARTMENT, PROJECT BA -26-009 WHEREAS, bids were solicited for the removal of four existing boilers and replacement with two new highly efficient units at the Shakopee Police Department, and the following complete and comparable bids were received: True Mechanical $156,000 Ryan Mechanical $168,000 Harris Company $235,000 WHEREAS, True Mechanical, 3225 West 180th Street, Jordan, MN 55352, is the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for the aforementioned project; and WHEREAS, staff recommends budgeting 10% in contingency costs ($15,600); and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: 1. The appropriate city officials are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with True Mechanical, in the name of the City of Shakopee for the removal of four existing boilers, replacement with two new highly efficient Lochinvar Crest FCB1000N Hellcat serries boilers, along with the coding and installation of associated piping, pumps, starting, and commissioning at the Shakopee Police Department. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 19th day of May 2026. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Prepared by: City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 94 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # BA -26-009 Project Name Police Department A/C Condenser and Boiler Total Project Cost $250,000 Department Building Internal Service Fund Category Police Status Active Fund Building Asset IS Fund Contact Assistant City Administrator Type Buildings Priority 1 - Have to do Useful Life 25 years Description Replace the A/C condenser and boiler in the Police Department. Justification The A/C condenser and boiler in the Police Department will have reached the end of their useful life. Expenditures Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings Total Funding Sources 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 250,000 0 0 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 Total 250,000 250,000 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total Building Internal Service Fund 250,000 0 0 0 0 250,000 Total 250,000 0 0 0 0 250,000 Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 179 95 WILLA! SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.k May 19, 2026 Approve a Consumption and Display Permit for Angels LLC. dba Taqueria Don Ramon. Heidi Emerson, Deputy City Clerk Action to be considered: Approve a Consumption and Display Permit for Angels LLC. dba Taqueria Don Ramon located at 1555 1st Avenue East. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: Angels LLC. dba Taqueria Don Ramon has submitted an application for a Consumption and Display permit at their restaurant located at 1555 1st Avenue East. This permit will allow customers to bring their own alcohol to consume in the establishment. The business will not sell, supply or serve any alcoholic beverages to customers, but will be required to ensure no person under the age of 21 is consuming alcohol in the restaurant. The application is on order. Recommendation: Approve the above requested motion. Budget Impact: N/A Attachments: 96 SHAKOPEE WILLA! Shakopee City Council 5.1 May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: Approve a Gambling Premises Permit for the Shakopee Rotary Prepared by: Heidi Emerson, Deputy City Clerk Reviewed by: Action to be considered: Approve a Gambling Premises Permit for the Shakopee Rotary located at Global Restaurant Group dba Dangerfield's Restaurant, located at 1583 1st Avenue East. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: The Shakopee Rotary is applying for a premises permit for gambling activities at Dangerfield's Restaurant, located at 1583 1st Avenue East. The business does meet the requirements set in City Code section 130.66 for gambling. The permit will be issued by the State Gambling Board. When the application is made, the board requires that the local unit of government pass a resolution specifically approving or denying the application. Recommendation: Approve the above requested motion. Budget Impact: N/A Attachments: Resolution R2026-084 97 RESOLUTION NO. R2026-084 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING A PREMISES PERMIT FOR THE SHAKOPEE ROTARY WHEREAS, the 1990 legislature adopted a law which requires municipal approval in order for the Gambling Control Board to issue or renew permits; and WHEREAS, the Shakopee Rotary is seeking a premises permit for the site at Global Restaurant Group LLC. dba Dangerfield's Restaurant of Shakopee, 1583 1st Avenue East, Shakopee Minnesota; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: That the premises permit for the Shakopee Rotary at Global Restaurant Group LLC. dba Dangerfield's Restaurant of Shakopee, 1583 1st Avenue East, Shakopee Minnesota, be approved. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this 19th day of May 2026. Matt Lehman, Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Richard Parsons City Clerk Prepared by: City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 98 SHAKOPEE Shakopee City Council 5.m May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: Approval of the May 5, 2026, City Council Minutes Prepared by: Rick Parsons Reviewed by: Action to be considered: Approve the May 5, 2026, City Council minutes Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: N/A Recommendation: Approve the May 5, 2026, City Council minutes. Budget Impact: N/A Attachments: 05-05-2026 City Council Minutes (Draft) 99 WilliAI SHAKOPEE City Council City Hall 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN, 55379 Tuesday, May 5, 2026 7:00 p.m. Vision: Shakopee is a place where people want to be! A distinctive river town, with a multitude of business, cultural and recreational opportunities in a safe, welcoming, and attractive environment for residents and visitors. Mission: Our mission is to deliver high quality services essential to maintaining a safe and sustainable community. We commit to doing this cost-effectively, with integrity and transparency. 1) Call to Order 2) Roll Call PRESENT: Mayor Lehman, Council Member Contreras, Council Member Whiting, Council Member DuLaney, and Council Member Lara ABSENT: None. ALSO PRESENT: None. 3) Pledge of Allegiance 4) Approval of Agenda Council Member Whiting made a motion to approve the agenda with the modification of pulling item 11.c, second by Council Member Contreras and the motion passed. 5 - 0 5) Consent Agenda 5.a) CivicRec Recreation Software Renewal 100 5.b) Declare Forfeited Vehicle as Surplus Property 5.c) Shakopee St. Francis 2025 Bonds - Amendment Requested by Borrower 5.d) Salary adjustment for City Council (pulled for separate consideration) 5.e) Approve a Special Event Permit and a Temporary Liquor License for Ales in the Alley. 5.f) Award Contract for the 2026 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Infrastructure Improvements Project 5.g) Award Contract for the Lions Park Parking Lot Improvements 5.h) Approve plans and authorize bidding for the Quarry Lake Erosion Restoration Project 5.i) Approve plans and authorize bidding for the Boiling Springs Drainage Improvement Project 5.j) Approve On Sale and Sunday Liquor Licenses for Schwaesdall Pub LLC. dba Arnie's. 5.k) Approve two Temporary Liquor Licenses for the Shakopee Lion's Club &t Foundation Softball Tournament. 5.1) Joint Powers Agreement with BCA for Prosecuting Services 5.m) Surplus Property 5.n) Snow Plowing / Ice Control Policy - (pulled for separate consideration) 5.o) Special Event Permit and Temporary Liquor License for JCI Shakopee 5.p) 2026 Annual Roadway Crack Seal Project 5.q) Approval of the April 21, 2026, City Council Minutes 5.r) Joe Schleper Stadium - Electrical Panel Upgrade 5.$) Arbor Day Proclamation 5.t) Contract with Stantec for South Shakopee AUAR Update Council Member DuLaney made a motion to approve the consent agenda with the modification of pulling item 5.d and 5.n for separate consideration, second by Council Member Contreras and the motion passed. 5 - 0 6) Public Comment 101 7) Business removed from consent agenda 5.d) Salary adjustment for City Council No action taken. 5.n) Snow Plowing / Ice Control Policy Council Member Whiting made a motion to approve the City's Snow Plowing and Ice Control Policy with the modification to Section 14, under "Landscaping", currently on agenda page 99, and remove the changes to Section 14, second by Council Member DuLaney and the motion passed. 5 - 0 8) Public Hearings 8.a) Gravel Pit TIF 22 Council Member Whiting made a motion to open public hearing, second by Council Member Contreras and the motion passed. 5 - 0 Council Member Whiting made a motion to close public hearing, second by Council Member Lara and the motion passed. 5 - 0 Council Member Whiting made a motion to approve Resolution R2026- 074 rescinding Resolution No. R2024-17 and approving tax increment financing plan for tax increment financing (soil deficiency) District No. 22 and modified redevelopment plan for the Minnesota River Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1, second by Council Member Contreras and the motion passed. 3 - 2 Nays: Mayor Lehman, Council Member DuLaney 8.b) Assessment hearing on delinquent false alarms and mowing services. Council Member Whiting made a motion to open public hearing for certifying assessments for delinquent police false alarms and mowing bills, second by Council Member Contreras and the motion passed. 5 - 0 Council Member Lara made a motion to close public hearing, second by Council Member DuLaney and the motion passed. 5 - 0 Council Member DuLaney made a motion to approve Resolution R2026- 063, certifying assessments for delinquent police false alarms and mowing bills, second by Council Member Lara and the motion passed. 5 -0 9) Recess for Economic Development Authority Meeting 102 Council Member Lara made a motion to recess for Economic Development Authority, second by Council Member DuLaney and the motion passed. 5 - 0 10) Reconvene Council Member Lara made a motion to recess for 10 minutes, second by Council Member Contreras and the motion passed. 5 - 0 The City Council reconvened at 8:39 pm. 11) General Business 11.a) Parks and Recreation Annual Report Presentation Informational only. 11.b) Final Plat of Highview Park 6th Addition Council Member Whiting made a motion to approve Resolution R2026- 071, approving the Final Plat of Highview Park 6th Addition, second by Council Member Contreras and the motion passed. 5 - 0 11.c) Donation for Sauna and Scholarship Fund in Honor of Xavier Gillen (item removed) 12) Reports 12.a) City Bill List 12.b) News and Announcements 13) Other Business 14) Adjourn to May 19, 2026, at 7:00 pm Council Member Whiting made a motion to adjourn to May 19, 2026, at 7:00 pm, second by Council Member Lara and the motion passed. 5 - 0 103 WILLA! SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.n May 19, 2026 Approve a Cooperative Agreement Amendment with Shakopee Public Schools for the Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Improvements Alex Jordan, City Engineer Action to be considered: Authorize staff to execute the First Amendment to the Cooperative Agreement with Shakopee Public Schools for the Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Improvements at Sweeney Elementary School. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: The 2026 Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Improvements project includes construction of pedestrian improvements along Adams Street serving Sweeney Elementary School. The improvements include converting Adams Street from a 4 -lane to a 3 -lane roadway, constructing a pedestrian island refuge with a pedestrian activated crosswalk and relocating the existing parent pick-up/drop-off driveway from Adams Street to the Lions Park roadway network. The project also includes construction of additional parking stalls at Sweeney Elementary. In 2025, the City and School District entered into a Cooperative Agreement for the project that memorialized the requirement of the School District to reimburse the City for the cost of the additional parking stalls. Now that the project costs have been determined, an amendment to the Cooperative Agreement is required to establish the final reimbursement amount. The School District will reimburse the City for the cost of the parking stalls upon completion of the improvements, which is expected to be in August. Recommendation: Authorize staff to execute the Cooperative Agreement Amendment Budget Impact: The cost of the additional parking stalls is $11,375.64. The School District will reimburse the City following construction of the improvements and within 30 days of receipt of an invoice. 104 Attachments: DOCSOPEN-#1094469-v1-First_Amendment= _Cooperative_Agreement_.pdf 105 FIRST AMENDMENT TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF CITY OF SHAKOPEE & INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #720 ROADWAY LOCATED AT SWEENEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL This First Amendment (the "Amendment") to the Cooperative Agreement For Construction And Use Of City Of Shakopee & Independent School District #720 Roadway Located At Sweeney Elementary School (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this _ day of , 2026, by and between the CITY OF SHAKOPEE, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 720, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "SCHOOL," each a "Party" to this Agreement, and together referred to as the "Parties." RECITALS A WHEREAS, the Parties are fee owners of certain adjacent land located at Sweeney Elementary School and Lions Park which are legally described in Exhibits A and B attached to the Agreement; and B. WHEREAS, the Parties entered into a cooperative agreement to build a private roadway at 1 1th Avenue to connect both properties thereby creating an ingress for SCHOOL traffic to safely enter SCHOOL property for optimal traffic control and increased pedestrian safety; and C. WHEREAS, the Parties entered into the Agreement and a separate Cross Access Easement Agreement establishing perpetual access between the two properties and outlined funding and construction requirements for the construction of the aforementioned roadway and various access points; D. WHEREAS, the Parties desire to Amend the Agreement to finalize the condition of reimbursement for the construction of six (6) parking stalls as contemplated in the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which each party hereby acknowledges, the parties agree as follows: 1. Section 3 of the Agreement shall be amended as follows, italics used for amended language emphasis only: Section 3. Funding and Payment: B. School to Reimburse City. The SCHOOL shall remit payment to the CITY following the completion of construction and within 30 days of receipt of invoice. The cost of the six (6) parking stalls is $11,375.64. If SCHOOL desires to add additional signage on CITY property outside of what is shown in the preliminary plans, SCHOOL will be responsible for future costs of such signage. Reimbursement will be due upon completion of the improvements within thirty (30) days upon receipt of invoice. 1 106 2. Ratification. The remaining terms in theAgreement remain in full force and effect. 3. Counterparts and Electronic Signature. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. The parties agree that the electronic signature of a party to this Amendment will be as valid as an original signature of such party and will be effective to bind such party to this Amendment. The parties further agree that any document (including this Amendment and any attachments or exhibits to this Amendment) containing, or to which there is affixed, an electronic signature will be deemed (i) to be "written" or "in writing," (ii) to have been signed and (iii) to constitute a record established and maintained in the ordinary course of business and an original written record when printed from electronic files. For purposes hereof, "electronic signature" also means a manually signed original signature that is then transmitted by any electronic means, including without limitation a faxed version of an original signature or an electronically scanned and transmitted version (e.g., via PDF) of an original signature. Any party's failure to produce the original signature of any electronically transmitted signature will not affect the enforceability of this Amendment. SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW 2 107 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first above written. CITY OF SHAKOPEE: By: Name: Matt Lehman Its: Mayor By: Name: William Reynolds Its: City Administrator SHAKOPEE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #720: By: Name: Its: School Board Chair By: Name: Its: School Board Clerk 3 108 WILLA! SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.o May 19, 2026 Approve an Agreement with MnDOT for the Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Grant Alex Jordan, City Engineer Action to be considered: Adopt Resolution R2026-077, Approving a Grant Agreement for the 2026 Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Improvements. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: At its May 20, 2025 meeting, the City Council accepted the MnDOT Safe Routes to School Infrastructure grant in the amount of $272,000 and at its May 5, 2026 meeting awarded a contract to S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. for the 2026 Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Improvements. The project includes construction of improvements at the following schools: • Sweeney Elementary School O Four -lane to Three -lane conversion of Adams Street between Vierling Drive and 10th Avenue O Relocation of the existing parent pick-up/drop-off driveway from Adams Street to the Lions Park roadway network O Pedestrian refuge island with a pedestrian activated crosswalk • Shakopee High School O Pedestrian refuge island at Fuller Street & Caspian Lane • Sun Path Elementary School O Extension of sidewalk south along Quail Drive to Quail Court A Grant Agreement is required with MnDOT to establish the grant terms, project requirements and reimbursement procedure. Recommendation: Adopt Resolution R2026-077 109 Budget Impact: The grant amount is $272,000, which will be reimbursed upon completion of the improvements. Attachments: 166-591-001 SRTSAgreeCOMPLETE.pdf R2026-077.docx 110 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL (SRTS) PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT This Agreement between the Minnesota Department of Transportation ("MnDOT") and the Grantee named below is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 174.40 and pursuant to pursuant to Minn. Laws 2023, Chapter 72- H.F. 669. The provisions in that section and the Exhibits attached hereto and incorporated by reference constitute this Agreement and the persons signing below agree to fully comply with all of the requirements of this Agreement. This Agreement will be effective on the date State obtains all required signatures under Minnesota Statutes §16C.05, subdivision 2. 1. Public Entity (Grantee) name, address and contact person: City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Contact Person/Title: William H. Reynolds, City Administrator 2. Project(s): Name of Project & Project Number (See Exhibit C for location) Amount of SRTS Funds Amount of Required Matching Funds Completion Date SAP No. 166-591-001 $272,000.00 $211,804.00 December 31, 2029 3. Total Amount of SRTS Grant for all projects under this Agreement: $272,000.00 4. The following Exhibits for each project are attached and incorporated by reference as part of this Agreement: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Completed Sources and Uses of Funds Schedule Project Schedule, Workforce Certificate, and Equal Pay Certificate Bond Financed Property Certification Grant Application Grantee Resolution Approving Grant Agreement General Terms and Conditions Revised October 2024 1 111 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 5. Additional requirements, if any: None 6. Any modification of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties. (The remaining portion of this page was intentionally left blank.) Revised October 2024 2 112 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 PUBLIC ENTITY (GRANTEE) The Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the grant agreement on behalf of the Grantee as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances. By: Title: Date: By: Title: Date: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Approval and Certifying Encumbrance as required by Minnesota Statutes § 16A.15 and 16C.05 By: State Aid Programs Manager (with delegated authority) Date: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT MANAGEMENT By: Date: Revised October 2024 1 113 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 EXHIBIT A SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS SCHEDULE SOURCES OF FUNDS USES OF FUNDS Entity Supplying Funds Amount State Funds: 2023 SRTS Funds Grant (SAAS Acct 386) Expenses Amount Items Paid for with SRTS $272,000.00 Grant Funds: Other: Subtotal Roadway, curb and gutter, storm sewer, RRFB, sidewalk $272,000.00 $272,000.00 Subtotal Public Entity Funds: Matching Funds Local Match $272,000.00 Items paid for with Non- SRTS Grant Funds: $211,804.00 Roadway, curb and gutter, Other: Subtotal storm sewer $ 211,804.00 $ 211,804.00 Subtotal TOTAL FUNDS $211,804.00 $483,804.00 = TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $483,804.00 Revised October 2024 2 114 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 EXHIBIT B PROJECT SCHEDULE, WORKFORCE CERTIFICATE, AND EQUAL PAY CERTIFICATE Award Date May 5, 2026 Construction Start Date June 8, 2026 Construction Substantial Complete Date August 28, 2026 Contract Final Completion Date: December 31, 2029 Revised October 2024 3 115 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS WORKFORCE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE The Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights by the signature below attests that SM HENTGES & SONS INC is hereby certified as a contractor under the Minnesota Human Rights Act, § 363A. Certificate start date: 3/30/2023 Certificate expiration date: 3/29/2027 Minnesota Department of Human Rights FOR THE DEPARTMENT BY: Rebecca Lucero, Commissioner AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 540 Fairview Ave N, Suite 201 crs St. Paul, MN 55104 03 Tel 651.539.1100 MN Relay 711 or 1.800.627.3529 03 Toll Free 1.800.657.3704 O3 mn.gov/mdhr 116 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS EQUAL PAY CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE The Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights by the signature below attests that SM HENTGES & SONS INC is hereby certified as a contractor under the Minnesota Human Rights Act, § 363A.44. Certificate start date: April 20, 2023 Certificate expiration date: April 19, 2027 Minnesota Department of Human Rights FOR THE DEPARTMENT BY: Rebecca Lucero, Commissioner AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 540 Fairview Ave N, Suite 201 • St. Paul, MN 55104 • Tel 651.539.1100 MN Relay 711 or 1.800.627.3529 • Toll Free 1.800.657.3704 • mn.gov/mdhr Rev 10/26/2021 117 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 EXHIBIT C BOND FINANCED PROPERTY CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota General Obligation Bond Financed Property The undersigned states that it has a fee simple, leasehold and/or easement interest in the real property located in the County(ies) of Scott, State of Minnesota that is generally described or illustrated graphically in Attachment 1 attached hereto and all improvements thereon (the "Restricted Property") and acknowledges that the Restricted Property is or may become State bond -financed property. To the extent that the Restricted Property is or becomes State bond -financed property, the undersigned acknowledges that: A. The Restricted Property is State bond -financed property under Minn. Stat. Sec. 16A.695, is subject to the requirements imposed by that statute, and cannot be sold, mortgaged, encumbered or otherwise disposed of without the approval of the Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget; and B. The Restricted Property is subject to the provisions of the Safe Routes to School Program Grant Agreement between the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the undersigned dated , 20; and C. The Restricted Property shall continue to be deemed State bond -financed property for 37.5 years or until the Restricted Property is sold with the written approval of the Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget. Date: , 20 City of Shakopee , a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: Revised October 2024 6 118 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 Attachment 1 to Exhibit C GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF RESTRICTED PROPERTY • Adams Street between 12th Avenue and 10th Avenue • French Trace Avenue between Sun Path Elementary School entrance and Quail Ct • Koeper Avenue at Caspian Lane Revised October 2024 7 119 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 EXHIBIT D GRANT APPLICATION Attach the grant application for the project Revised October 2024 120 Form Name: Submission Time: Browser: IP Address: Unique ID: Location: 2024 Minnesota State Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program: Infrastructure Solicitation Application January 17, 2025 9:43 am Chrome 124.0.0.0 / Windows 156.142.191.142 1306291559 44.8565, -93.4388 Minnesota Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program: Infrastructure Solicitation Application I. Project Information A. Applicant Entity Information Name Alex Jordan Entity Name Job Title/Position City of Shakopee City Engineer Phone (952) 233-9361 Email Entity Type Address County MnDOT District ajordan@shakopeemn.gov State Aid City 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Scott Metro District B. Project Sponsor Information As a grant applicant, are you representing a township, non -state aid city, or a school or school district? If yes, you are required to have a project sponsor. No, I am not a township, non -state aid city, or a school or school district C. Project Funding Has this project been selected for No federal funding? Is this project applying for competitive No funding from another source in addition to this program? SRTS Grant Request 200000 121 Local City Funds 110000 Total project cost 310000 Are funds from all sources committed? No If no, describe which sources are not committed and how they will become committed. The local funding share is not programmed in the City's Capital Improvement Plan. If the City were successful in receiving Safe Routes to School Funds, the local share of the project would be recommended to be programmed in the City's 2026-2030 CIP. If that funding is not obtained, the local portion of the project would be removed from the scope of the improvements and the portion of the project attributed to Safe Routes to School funding can still be implemented. The local share of the project is for relocating the driveway on School District property to provide increased vehicle queuing space and removing conflicts with pedestrians from the public roadway. D. Project Location Will any proposed infrastructure improvements be constructed on the right-of-way or property of a township, city, or county other than the applicant entity or project sponsor? No Beginning Point - Latitude 44.78678 Beginning Point - Longitude -93.54255 E. Brief Project Description Enter a brief description or title of your project. Example: Construct shared use path along north side of CSAH 12 (Cedar Street) including bumpouts at all quadrants at the CSAH 12 and Main Street intersection in the City of Moose River. Construction of Enhanced Pedestrian Improvements at Adams Street and 11th Avenue, implement a 4 to 3 lane reduction along Adams Street, and relocate the driveway access for Sweeney Elementary School in the City of Shakopee. F. Eligibility Check 122 The applicant must have a full resolution (not just a letter of support) from their council or governing board approving the project and pledging support to fund engineering, right of way, inspection, and other non-SRTS eligible costs, as well as SRTS-eligible items in excess of the SRTS Infrastructure grant amount. The applicant understands this eligibility requirement and has executed the signed resolution for attachment to the application. Yes Schools, school districts, townships, Not applicable (application is from a state aid city, county, or Federally and non -state aid cities will need a state Recognized Indian Tribe) aid city or county to serve as their project sponsor. If a project sponsor is required, the applicant must have a full resolution (not just a letter of support) from the sponsoring entity's council supporting the project and agreeing to act as the project sponsor. The applicant understands this eligibility requirement and has obtained the signed resolution for attachment to the application. The applicant must have a full resolution (not just a letter of support) from all non -Tribal entities (except MnDOT) other than the applicant entity or project sponsor whose property or right-of-way will be impacted by the proposed project. The applicant understands this eligibility requirement and has obtained, if required, the signed resolution(s) from all impacted entities for attachment to the application. Not applicable (no other public entity right-of-way is impacted) Does the applicant entity have the Yes - project will be maintained and provide a service life of 10 or more ability to maintain the infrastructure years improvement and provide an expected service life of a minimum of 10 years? The applicant affirms to the best of their current knowledge and belief that this requirement will be met. 123 Does the school district have plans to relocate or repurpose the school facilities benefiting from the infrastructure improvement within the next 10 years? The applicant affirms to the best of their current knowledge and belief that this requirement will be met. No - benefiting school facilities will not be relocated or repurposed in the next 10 years Projects are required to be ready for Yes construction in 2025 or 2026. The applicant understands this eligibility requirement and will award a contract and be under construction by December 31, 2026. Please select the anticipated 2026 construction year Safe Routes to School Infrastructure grant funds cannot be used on impacts to trunk highways or trunk highway right-of-way without an explicit letter of support from the MnDOT District Engineer. The applicant understands this eligibility requirement and has obtained, if required, the letter of support for attachment to the application. Not applicable (the proposed project does not have trunk highway impacts) All non -Tribal eligible applicants for Yes Safe Routes to School infrastructure funds must have adopted subdivision regulations that require Safe Routes to School infrastructure in developments authorized on or after June 1, 2016. The applicant understands this eligibility requirement and can attach proof of compliance to the application via ordinance or other language that demonstrates how it is applied. 124 Only construction costs are eligible for Yes the program. Development of engineering and construction plans are not eligible expenses nor are right-of-way acquisition costs. All selected projects must follow the State Aid process, which includes identifying applicable design standards and developing a construction plan set signed by a licensed engineer. The applicant must have the ability to develop this plan set or the funds to pay a consultant to develop this plan set. Exhibits from engineering studies do not qualify as a construction plan set. The applicant understands this requirement and has the ability or funds to develop the plan set. Safe Routes to School funds cannot be Yes used to pay school, local entity, or Federally Recognized Indian Tribe staff time to construct or install any improvements. School, local entity, or Federally Recognized Indian Tribe staff time is not an eligible cost for SRTS Infrastructure funds. All selected projects must be put out to bid and awarded to a contractor. The applicant understands this program requirement and plans to bid the project out to a contractor. Has the project received a legislative No appropriation (also known as an "earmark")? 125 Statute 16B.981 Subd. 2 (6) requires that Yes no current principals of a grantee have been convicted of a felony financial crime in the last 10 years. A principal is defined as a public official, a board member, or staff (paid or volunteer) with the authority to access funds provided by this grant opportunity or to determine how those funds are used. Political subdivisions as defined in Statute 465.719 (including school districts) and Federally Recognized Indian Tribes are not subject to this requirement. Checking "yes" is acknowledgement that if selected to receive a grant and if required by statute, the applicant will be required to complete a form certifying that no current principal of its organization has been convicted of a felony financial crime in the last 10 years. G. Project Evaluation Name Job Title / Role Email Phone Alex Jordan City Engineer ajordan@shakopeemn.gov 952-233-9361 II. Project Improvements & Safety H. School Information School 1: School Name Sweeney Elementary School School 1: School Location 1001 Adams Street S, Shakopee, MN 55379 School 1: Grades Available Kindergarten - 5 School 1: Number of Students Enrolled 599 School 1: Percentage of Students 6 Walking or Biking to School School 1: Percentage of Students 50 Taking Bus to School 126 School 1: School Type Public I. Safety Concerns At any location in the project area, do pedestrians or bicyclists travel where safe infrastructure is not provided? Yes Check any that apply below: Pedestrians walk along the grass or ditch. People walk or bike within a vehicle travel lane or roadway People cross a roadway at any point other than an intersection or marked crossing Have safety risks or hazards related to vehicles been identified within the project area that prevent people from safely walking or biking in or near the project area? Yes Check any that are present in the project area: High vehicle speeds High levels of traffic Low stop or yield compliance for pedestrians or cyclists Low visibility of pedestrians or cyclists / Drivers unable to see pedestrians or cyclists 127 List and concisely describe the safety risks, hazards, or uncomfortable walking or biking conditions that have been identified above, including the locations of these risks and conditions. Applicants may also reference any survey data, crash data, pedestrian or bicycle plan, or other relevant sources. Upload any referenced sources when submitting this application. Each attachment must be referenced in the application, otherwise the attachment will not be considered in the scoring of the application. The City's Safe Routes to School Plan identified several safety issues on the public roadways surrounding Sweeney Elementary School that are proposed to be improved with the requested infrastructure funding, • Concerns with traffic speeds on Adams Street, which is currently constructed as a 4 -lane undivided roadway. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Parents identified traffic speeds and volumes as a safety risk along Adams Street, which is the overwhelming reason more students do not walk or bike to school. • Long pedestrian crossing distance crossing with no refuge, providing insufficient separation from traffic • The current pedestrian crossing is marked with a non -pedestrian activated flashing yellow ball. This system is outdated and does not provide adequate driver compliance for yielding to pedestrians in crosswalks • There are conflicts at the crossing location, specifically relating to vehicle queues during pick up and drop off given the location of the crossing. The location of the existing pedestrian crossing is in the same location as the current driveway access for pick up and drop off, making it difficult for vehicles to see pedestrians as they are focused on navigating the congested area. The 2024 Updated Parent/Student survey noted that there is a significant lack of driver yielding compliance for pedestrians crossing Adams At at the current crosswalk location. Parents encourage students to walk 1/2 mile out of their way to get to school to avoid this crossing. J. Types of Improvements Curbs and medians New curb and gutter Median (concrete) Signage and striping New signage (all types) RRFB New crosswalk striping Sidewalks and trails New sidewalks Trails and shared use paths 128 Provide a full project description including specific locations of each improvement identified above. Please include descriptions for other improvements not listed above as well. Include any project maps or design exhibits. These exhibits may be uploaded with your application. The project includes construction of several improvements, all which were recommended in the 2021 SRTS Plan, including: - Seal coat and restripe Adams Street north and south of 11th Avenue as a 3 -lane undivided roadway, with a continuous two way left turn lane (road diet) - Construction of a raised pedestrian refuge median island on Adams Street south of 11th Avenue - Relocation of the pedestrian crossing to the south side of 11th Avenue, removing additional conflicts with vehicles - Installation of a post -mounted RRFB, pedestrian scale lighting, high visibility pedestrian crosswalk blocks and stop bars - Relocation of school driveway to adjacent city parking lot to remove conflicts and increase vehicle queuing space K. Project Improvements Schools: Describe how listed improvements would connect students to schools within your community. If your school provides hazard busing or has a no walking/biking to school policy in place currently, would these be removed or altered with construction of this project? The enhanced pedestrian crossing at Adams Street would provide improved compliance for drivers yielding to pedestrians in the crossing. FHWA estimates that RRFBs can increase motorists yielding rate up to 98%. This would remove the barrier of the current concerns parents have of the unsafe crossing and allow more students the permission to walk/bike to school. Approximately 1/3 of the students attending Sweeney Elementary live on the west side of Adams Street and could benefit from this crossing. Additionally, the road diet reduces the risk of pedestrian crashes by up to 47% (FHWA) and may reduce vehicle speeds, improving the safety of pedestrians crossing the roadway. Safety Risk Mitigation: Explain how each of the listed improvements in "Section J. Types of Improvements" would mitigate the safety risks and hazards described in "Section I. Safety Concerns." • The road diet and construction of the raised pedestrian refuge would reduce the pedestrian crossing distance, providing increased separation from traffic and decrease the crossing time and vehicle conflicts. Road diets have proven to be a traffic calming measure and provide more consistent lower speeds along Adams Street. 4 to 3 lane conversions also provide a reduction of crashes by up to 47%. Raised median refuges provide an estimated 56% reduction in pedestrian crashes (FHWA). • Relocating the crosswalk to the south side of 11th Avenue will reduce vehicle conflicts by not having the crossing located within the vehicle queueing area for pick up/drop off. Additionally, relocation of the school access driveway would further remove the conflicts by allowing vehicles to queue in the adjacent city parking lot, rather than along Adams Street where those vehicles conflict with pedestrians crossing the roadway. • The installation of an RRFB will improve driver yielding compliance over the current crossing system, decreasing the likelihood of pedestrian/vehicle conflicts. RRFBs have shown to increase driver yielding compliance by up to 98% and can reduce pedestrian crashes by 47% (FHWA). 129 Ill. Community Engagement & Transportation Policies L. Plans, Policies, & Studies Does the applicant entity or project sponsor have a Safe Routes to School (SRTS) plan or any other non -motorized transportation plan(s) in place or under development? Yes - please attach to application Describe the contents and extents of the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) plan and/or non -motorized transportation plan(s). Include the year of adoption for each document listed. City of Shakopee Safe Routes to School Plan, October 2021 The Shakopee SRTS Plan identifies program strategies to create a culture of walking, biking, and rolling and infrastructure recommendations to support a safe and comfortable environment for active transportation near campus. Some recommendations may be implemented almost immediately while others will require more planning, analysis, and funding. While not all of these recommendations can be implemented right away, achieving short-term successes where possible will help build momentum and lay the groundwork for more complex projects in the future. Has the adopted plan received any updates, addendums, surveys, public engagement sessions, or any other changes since it was adopted? Yes - please attach to application Briefly describe the updates The City's Engineering Department partnered with Shakopee High School's Center for Advanced Professional Studies Academy to conduct a SRTS survey update relating to infrastructure improvements. Are the improvements in this project identified in any of the above listed plan(s)? Yes Please provide the page number(s) on which the project is identified 23,24 Describe how the proposed improvements in this project were identified, planned, and prioritized. Also, include any community/stakeholder engagement or public outreach activities. Each of the improvements proposed were identified in the City's Safe Routes to School Plan. These improvements were identified through community engagement, including Parent Surveys, along with working groups such as the City's Traffic Safety Committee. Additionally, the City partnered with Shakopee High School's CAPS (Center of Advanced Professional Studies) Human Services Academy seniors to conduct public outreach in 2024. The results of this outreach included recommendations and support for the proposed improvements, meaning they are still valid from the 2021 SRTS Plan development. 130 Has the applicant entity and/or project sponsor adopted a Complete Streets Policy or other policies or practices encouraging and promoting Complete Streets policies and practices in planning, design and construction? If yes, please describe these policies or practices and attach them to the application. If no, please mark "N/A". The City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan identified that the City should develop and enact a Complete Streets Policy. The City is currently in the process of developing this plan. City Code currently requires all new roadways be constructed with trails/sidewalks, boulevards, and roadway trees to reduce vehicle speeds and provide for safe pedestrian accommodations. Additionally, the City's Traffic Safety Committee reviews pedestrian and traffic safety issues quarterly and provides recommendations for improvements, targeted at improving traffic safety for all modes of transportation. IV. Equity Score M: Implementing the 6E Strategies Check all of the 6E Strategies implemented at the school(s) or school district(s). Please describe events, policies and programs serving these strategies. Evaluation Equity Engagement/Enforcement Education Encouragement Engineering EVALUATION: Please describe events, policies and programs serving this strategy. The City's SRTS Plan recommended completing caregiver surveys every 2-3 years. The City partnered with three high school seniors from Shakopee High School's Human Services Academy CAPS Program to conduct a survey in December 2024. The survey included questions regarding how students get to school, what barriers exist preventing them from walking/biking to school, and what improvements should the city consider be implemented to make it easier/safer to walk/bike to school. EQUITY - Please describe events, policies and programs serving this strategy. The City's SRTS Plan included recommendations to ensure and activities are design that are inclusive of students of all backgrounds and abilities. As part of a City of Shakopee SRTS Demonstration Project along 10th Avenue (2022), the City completed a follow up survey to obtain feedback on how the project was perceived. Over 50% of respondents agreed that the project improved safety for everyone, including children, senior and people with disabilities. ENGAGEMENT/ENFORCEMENT: Please describe events, policies and programs serving this strategy. The City partnered with three high school seniors from Shakopee High School's Human Services Academy CAPS Program to conduct a survey in December 2024. The survey included questions regarding how students get to school, what barriers exist preventing them from walking/biking to school, and what improvements should the city consider be implemented to make it easier/safer to walk/bike to school. EDUCATION: Please describe events, policies and programs serving this strategy. School newsletters 131 ENCOURAGEMENT: Please describe events, policies and programs serving this strategy. Walk/Bike to School Days ,Mountain Biking Club , Crossing Guards, Park & Walk, School and District -Wide Communications The Safe Routes to School Plan identified additional programs that have been prioritized into implementation timelines based on existing programs, input from local stakeholders, and readiness of the school to launch the program ENGINEERING: Please describe events, policies and programs serving this strategy. The City of Shakopee completed a SRTS Demonstration Project in 2022 along 10th Avenue for Sweeney Elementary School in partnership with Shakopee Public Schools. This project was positively received and highlighted the engineering components of SRTS. Additionally, the City of Shakopee partnered with Shakopee High School's CAPS Human Services Academy in 2023 to complete an engineering corridor study along 10th Avenue. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gb7ZHJHHOQg (1:10' mark) N. Advancing Equity Priority Populations Residents of Color Low Income High Density Residential Aged Under 18 Limited or Non-English Speaking Renter or Non -Owner Describe how the ability for priority populations to use active transportation will be advanced with this proposed project. Include specific project area schools and statistics that support the priority population boxes checked above. The Sweeney Elementary School zone boundary is partially located within Environmental Justice Areas, including those with 35% of people under the 200% poverty income and/or Limited or Non-English speaking populations. Additionally, the school has a STEPP score of 4, identifying that the school's population are more likely to rely on walking or biking for transportation and are more vulnerable to unsafe traffic conditions. The proposed improvements will allow those priority populations who may not have access to transportation a safer way to get to and from school, by constructing enhanced intersection crossing improvements directly connecting priority neighborhoods to the school. The improvements will eliminate those barriers advancing equity. The proposed improvements will be designed to ADA standards in order to be accessible to people of all abilities. Truncated domes, RRFBs and pedestrian island refuges will improve intersection safety for those who may be more vulnerable to unsafe traffic conditions, such as children traveling to school or people with disabilities. At a larger scale, the improve safety of the pedestrian crossings will provide regional trail connections to parks (including City's Lions Park and Sandventure Aquatic Center), trails, schools and commercial nodes. The increased connections will support public health benefits for residents in the area from children to older adults. 132 0. Safe Routes to School Equity Score V. Attachments Approved applicant entity resolution of support (PDF) https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17464898854 For all eligible non -Tribal applicants: Applicant entity subdivision certification, regulations, or ordinances. (PDF) https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17464898855 Engineering or planning -based cost estimate with itemized breakdown (Excel) https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17464898872 Timeline of project indicating major milestones and their anticipated completion dates (PDF) https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17464898922 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Plan and/or other non -motorized transportation plan or study that identifies the proposed project or improvements (PDF) - or - a link to the documents if publicly available elsewhere https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17464898936 Any revisions, addenda or public engagement surveys updating the above documents (if applicable) (PDF) https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17464898950 At least one location map with project routes or improvements identified. If you choose to include project photos, please make sure the project location map is the first page in this attachment (PDF) https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17464898951 Upload additional supporting document here. Please merge multiple similar documents together (say three letters of support) or if additional upload slots are required. https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17464898958 Upload additional supporting document here. Please merge multiple similar documents together (say three letters of support) or if additional upload slots are required. https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17464898967 133 VI. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Having had the opportunity to review the above Organizational Conflict of Interest Checklist, the applicant hereby indicates that it has, to the best of its knowledge and belief: Determined that no potential organization conflict of interest exists VII. Affirmation of Noncollusion The Applicant affirms that this solicitation response has been submitted without collusion. Yes VIII. 2024 SRTS Infrastructure Application Submittal The applicant affirms to the best of their Yes current knowledge and belief that this grant application submittal is accurate and complete. 134 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 EXHIBIT E GRANTEE RESOLUTION APPROVING GRANT AGREEMENT Revised October 2024 9 135 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 RESOLUTION R2026-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING A GRANT AGREEMENT FOR THE 2026 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS, CIF -26-010 AND SAP NO. 166-591-001 WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee has applied to the Commissioner of Transportation for a grant from the Safe Routes to Schools Account; and WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation has given notice that funding for this project is available; and WHEREAS, the amount of the grant has been determined to be $272,000.00 by reason of the lowest responsible bid; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA does hereby agree to the terms and conditions of the grant consistent with Minnesota Statutes, section 174.40, and will pay any additional amount by which the cost exceeds the estimate and will return to the Safe Routes to Schools Account any amount appropriated for the project but not required. The proper City officers are authorized to execute a grant agreement and any amendments thereto with the Commissioner of Transportation concerning the above - referenced grant. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 19th day of May 2026. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Prepared by: City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Revised October 2024 10 136 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 EXHIBIT F GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOLS (SRTS) GRANTS Article I DEFINITIONS Section 1.01 Defined Terms. The following terms shall have the meanings set out respectively after each such term (the meanings to be equally applicable to both the singular and plural forms of the terms defined) unless the context specifically indicates otherwise: "Advance(s)" - means an advance made or to be made by MnDOT to the Public Entity and disbursed in accordance with the provisions contained in Article VI hereof. "Agreement" - means the Safe Routes to Schools Grant Agreement between the Public Entity and the Minnesota Department of Transportation to which this Exhibit is attached. "Certification" - means the certification, in the form attached as Exhibit C, in which the Public Entity acknowledges that its interest in the Real Property is bond financed property within the meaning of Minn. Stat. Sec. 16A.695 and is subject to certain restrictions imposed thereby. "Code" - means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and all treasury regulations, revenue procedures and revenue rulings issued pursuant thereto. "Commissioner" - means the Commissioner of Minnesota Management & Budget. "Commissioner's Order" - means the "Fourth Order Amending Order of the Commissioner of Minnesota Management & Budget Relating to Use and Sale of State Bond Financed Property" dated July 30, 2012, as it may be amended or supplemented. "Completion Date" - means the projected date for completion of the Project as indicated in the Agreement. "Construction Contract Documents" - means the document or documents, in form and substance acceptable to MnDOT, including but not limited to any construction plans and specifications and any exhibits, amendments, change orders, modifications thereof or supplements thereto, which collectively form the contract between the Public Entity and the Contractor(s) for the completion of the Construction Items on or before the Completion Date for either a fixed price or a guaranteed maximum price. "Construction Items" - means the work to be performed under the Construction Contract Documents. "Contractor" - means any person engaged to work on or to furnish materials and supplies for the Construction Items including, if applicable, a general contractor. "Draw Requisition" - means a draw requisition that the Public Entity, or its designee, submits to MnDOT when an Advance is requested, as referred to in Section 4.02. Revised October 2024 1 1 137 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 "G.O. Bonds" - means the state general obligation bonds issued under the authority granted in Article XI, Sec. 5(a) of the Minnesota Constitution, the proceeds of which are used to fund the SRTS Grant, and any bonds issued to refund or replace such bonds. "Grant Application" - means the grant application that the Public Entity submitted to MnDOT which is attached as Exhibit D. "SRTS Grant" - means a grant from MnDOT to the Public Entity under the SRTS in the amount specified in the Agreement, as such amount may be modified under the provisions hereof. "SRTS" - means the Safe Routes to School Program pursuant to Minn. Stat. Sec. 174.40 and rules relating thereto. "MnDOT" - means the Minnesota Department of Transportation. "Outstanding Balance of the SRTS Grant" - means the portion of the SRTS Grant that has been disbursed to the Public Entity minus any amounts returned to the Commissioner. "Project" - means the Project identified in the Agreement to be totally or partially funded with a SRTS grant. "Public Entity" - means the grantee of the SRTS Grant and identified as the Public Entity in the Agreement. "Real Property" - means the real property identified in the Agreement on which the Project is located. Article II GRANT Section 2.01 Grant of Monies. MnDOT shall make the SRTS Grant to the Public Entity, and disburse the proceeds in accordance with the terms and conditions herein. Section 2.02 Public Ownership, The Public Entity acknowledges and agrees that the SRTS Grant is being funded with the proceeds of G.O. Bonds, and as a result all of the Real Property must be owned by one or more public entities. The Public Entity represents and warrants to MnDOT that it has one or more of the following ownership interests in the Real Property: (i) fee simple ownership, (ii) an easement that is for a term that extends beyond the date that is 37.5 years from the Agreement effective date, or such shorter term as authorized by statute, and which cannot be modified or terminated early without the prior written consent of MnDOT and the Commissioner; and/or (iii) a prescriptive easement for a term that extends beyond the date that is 37.5 years from the Agreement effective date. Section 2.03 Use of Grant Proceeds. The Public Entity shall use the SRTS Grant solely to reimburse itself for expenditures it has already made, or will make, to pay the costs of one of the following applicable activities: (i) acquisition of land or permanent easements, (ii) predesign, design, preliminary and final engineering and environmental studies authorized under Minn. Stat. Sec. 174.40, subdiv. lb, or (iii) construction and reconstruction of publicly owned infrastructure in this state with a useful life of at least 10 years that provides nonmotorized transportation to and from a school. Section 2.04 Operation of the Real Property. The Real Property must be used by the Public Entity in conjunction with or for nonmotorized transportation. The Public Entity shall have no intention on the effective date of the Agreement to use the Real Property as a trunk highway or any part of a trunk highway. The Public Revised October 2024 12 138 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 Entity must annually determine that the Real Property is being used for the purposes specified in this Section and, upon written request by either MnDOT or the Commissioner, shall supply a notarized statement to that effect. Section 2.05 Sale or Lease of Real Property. The Public Entity shall not (i) sell or transfer any part of its ownership interest in the Real Property, or (ii) lease out or enter into any contract that would allow another entity to use or operate the Real Property without the written consent of both MnDOT and the Commissioner. The sale or transfer of any part of the Public Entity's ownership interest in the Real Property, or any lease or contract that would allow another entity to use or operate the Real Property, must comply with the requirements imposed by Minn. Stat. Sec. 16A.695 and the Commissioner's Order regarding such sale or lease. Section 2.06 Public Entity's Representations and Warranties. The Public Entity represents and warrants to MnDOT that: A. It has legal authority to execute, deliver and perform the Agreement and all documents referred to therein, and it has taken all actions necessary to its execution and delivery of such documents. B. It has the ability and a plan to fund the operation of the Real Property for the purposes specified in Section 2.04, and will include in its annual budget all funds necessary for the operation of the Real Property for such purposes. C. The Agreement and all other documents referred to therein are the legal, valid and binding obligations of the Public Entity enforceable against the Public Entity in accordance with their respective terms. D. It will comply with all of the provisions of Minn. Stat. Sec. 16A.695, the Commissioner's Order and the SRTS. It has legal authority to use the G.O. Grant for the purpose or purposes described in this Agreement. E. All of the information it has submitted or will submit to MnDOT or the Commissioner relating to the SRTS Grant or the disbursement of the SRTS Grant is and will be true and correct. F. It is not in violation of any provisions of its charter or of the laws of the State of Minnesota, and there are no actions or proceedings pending, or to its knowledge threatened, before any judicial body or governmental authority against or affecting it relating to the Real Property, or its ownership interest therein, and it is not in default with respect to any order, writ, injunction, decree, or demand of any court or any governmental authority which would impair its ability to enter into the Agreement or any document referred to herein, or to perform any of the acts required of it in such documents. G. Neither the execution and delivery of the Agreement or any document referred to herein nor compliance with any of the provisions or requirements of any of such documents is prevented by, is a breach of, or will result in a breach of, any provision of any agreement or document to which it is now a party or by which it is bound. H. The contemplated use of the Real Property will not violate any applicable zoning or use statute, ordinance, building code, rule or regulation, or any covenant or agreement of record relating thereto. Revised October 2024 13 139 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 1. The Project will be completed and the Real Property will be operated in full compliance with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations of any federal, state, or local political subdivision having jurisdiction over the Project and the Real Property. J. All applicable licenses, permits and bonds required for the perfonnance and completion of the Project and for the operation of the Real Property as specified in Section 2.04 have been, or will be, obtained. K. It reasonably expects to possess its ownership interest in the Real Property described in Section 2.02 for at least 37.5 years, and it does not expect to sell such ownership interest. L. It does not expect to lease out or enter into any contract that would allow another entity to use or operate the Real Property. M. It will supply whatever funds are needed in addition to the SRTS Grant to complete and fully pay for the Project. N. The Construction Items will be completed substantially in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents by the Completion Date and all such items will be situated entirely on the Real Property. O. It will require the Contractor or Contractors to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, and laws bearing on its performance under the Construction Contract Documents. P. It shall furnish such satisfactory evidence regarding the representations and warranties described herein as may be required and requested by either MnDOT or the Commissioner. Q. It has made no material false statement or misstatement of fact in connection with its receipt of the G.O. Grant, and all the information it has submitted or will submit to the State Entity or Commissioner of MMB relating to the G.O. Grant or the disbursement of any of the G.O. Grant is and will be true and correct. Section 2.07 Event(s) of Default. The following events shall, unless waived in writing by MnDOT and the Commissioner, constitute an Event of Default under the Agreement upon either MnDOT or the Commissioner giving the Public Entity 30 days' written notice of such event and the Public Entity's failure to cure such event during such 30 -day time period for those Events of Default that can be cured within 30 days or within whatever time period is needed to cure those Events of Default that cannot be cured within 30 days as long as the Public Entity is using its best efforts to cure and is making reasonable progress in curing such Events of Default; however, in no event shall the time period to cure any Event of Default exceed six (6) months unless otherwise consented to, in writing, by MnDOT and the Commissioner. A. If any representation, covenant, or warranty made by the Public Entity herein or in any other document furnished pursuant to the Agreement, or to induce MnDOT to disburse the SRTS Grant, shall prove to have been untrue or incorrect in any material respect or materially misleading as of the time such representation, covenant, or warranty was made. B. If the Public Entity fails to fully comply with any provision, covenant, or warranty contained herein. Revised October 2024 14 140 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 C. If the Public Entity fails to fully comply with any provision, covenant or warranty contained in Minn. Stat. Sec. 16A.695, the Commissioner's Order, or Minn. Stat. Sec. 174.40 and all rules related thereto. D. If the Public Entity fails to use the proceeds of the SRTS Grant for the purposes set forth in Section 2.03, the Grant Application, and in accordance with the SRTS. E. If the Public Entity fails to operate the Real Property for the purposes specified in Section 2.04. F. If the Public Entity fails to complete the Project by the Completion Date. G. If the Public Entity sells or transfers any portion of its ownership interest in the Real Property without first obtaining the written consent of both MnDOT and the Commissioner. H. If the Public Entity fails to provide any additional funds needed to fully pay for the Project. I. If the Public Entity fails to supply the funds needed to operate the Real Property in the manner specified in Section 2.04. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any of the above events that cannot be cured shall, unless waived in writing by MnDOT and the Commissioner, constitute an Event of Default under the Agreement immediately upon either MnDOT or the Commissioner giving the Public Entity written notice of such event. Section 2.08 Remedies. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default and at any time thereafter until such Event of Default is cured to the satisfaction of MnDOT, MnDOT or the Commissioner may enforce any or all of the following remedies. A. MnDOT may refrain from disbursing the SRTS Grant; provided, however, MnDOT may make such disbursements after the occurrence of an Event of Default without waiving its rights and remedies hereunder. B. If the Event of Default involves a sale of the Public Entity's interest in the Real Property in violation of Minn. Stat. Sec. 16A.695 or the Commissioner's Order, the Commissioner, as a third party beneficiary of the Agreement, may require that the Public Entity pay the amounts that would have been paid if there had been compliance with such provisions. For other Events of Default, the Commissioner may require that the Outstanding Balance of the SRTS Grant be returned to it. C. Either MnDOT or the Commissioner, as a third party beneficiary of the Agreement, may enforce any additional remedies it may have in law or equity. The rights and remedies specified herein are cumulative and not exclusive of any rights or remedies that MnDOT or the Commissioner would otherwise possess. If the Public Entity does not repay the amounts required to be paid under this Section or under any other provision contained herein within 30 days of demand by the Commissioner, or any amount ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction within 30 days of entry of judgment against the Public Entity and in favor of MnDOT and/or the Commissioner, then such amount may, unless precluded by law, be offset against any aids or other monies that the Public Entity is entitled to receive from the State of Minnesota. Section 2.09 Notification of Event of Default. The Public Entity shall furnish to MnDOT and the Commissioner, as soon as possible and in any event within seven (7) days after it has obtained knowledge of Revised October 2024 15 141 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 the occurrence of each Event of Default, a statement setting forth details of each Event of Default and the action which the Public Entity proposes to take with respect thereto. Section 2.10 Effect of Event of Default. The Agreement shall survive Events of Default and remain in full force and effect, even upon full disbursement of the SRTS Grant, and shall only be terminated under the circumstances set forth in Section 2.11. Section 2.11 Termination of Agreement and Modification of SRTS Grant. A. If the Project is not started within five (5) years after the effective date of the Agreement or the SRTS Grant has not been disbursed within four (4) years after the date the Project was started, MnDOT' s obligation to fund the SRTS Grant shall terminate. In such event, (i) if none of the SRTS Grant has been disbursed by such date, MnDOT shall have no obligation to fund the SRTS Grant and the Agreement will terminate, and (ii) if some but not all of the SRTS Grant has been disbursed by such date, MnDOT shall have no further obligation to provide any additional funding for the SRTS Grant and the Agreement shall remain in force but shall be modified to reflect the amount of the SRTS Grant that was actually disbursed and the Public Entity is still obligated to complete the Project by the Completion Date. B. The Agreement shall terminate upon the Public Entity's sale of its interest in the Real Property and transmittal of the required portion of the proceeds of the sale to the Commissioner in compliance with Minn. Stat. Sec. 16A.695 and the Commissioner's Order, or upon the termination of the Public Entity's ownership interest in the Real Property if such ownership interest is an easement. Section 2.12 Excess Funds. If the full amount of the G.O. Grant and any matching funds referred to in Section 5.13 are not needed to complete the Project, then, unless language in the G.O. Bonding Legislation indicates otherwise, the G.O. Grant shall be reduced by the amount not needed. Article III COMPLIANCE WITH MINNESOTA STATUTE, SEC. 16A.695 AND THE COMMISSIONER'S ORDER Section 3.01 State Bond Financed Property. The Public Entity acknowledges that its interest in the Real Property is, or when acquired by it will be, "state bond financed property", as such term is used in Minn. Stat. Sec. 16A.695 and the Commissioner's Order and, therefore, the provisions contained in such statute and order apply, or will apply, to its interest in the Real Property, even if the SRTS Grant will only pay for a portion of the Project. Section 3.02 Preservation of Tax Exempt Status. In order to preserve the tax-exempt status of the G.O. Bonds, the Public Entity agrees as follows: A. It will not use the Real Property or use or invest the SRTS Grant or any other sums treated as "bond proceeds" under Section 148 of the Code (including "investment proceeds," "invested sinking funds" and "replacement proceeds") in such a manner as to cause the G.O. Bonds to be classified as "arbitrage bonds" under Code Section 148. B. It will deposit and hold the SRTS Grant in a segregated non -interest -bearing account until such funds are used for payments for the Project. C. It will, upon written request, provide the Commissioner all information required to satisfy the informational requirements set forth in the Code, including Sections 103 and 148, with respect to the G.O. Bonds. Revised October 2024 16 142 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 D. It will, upon the occurrence of any act or omission by the Public Entity that could cause the interest on the G.O. Bonds to no longer be tax exempt and upon direction from the Commissioner, take such actions and furnish such documents as the Commissioner determines to be necessary to ensure that the interest to be paid on the G.O. Bonds is exempt from federal taxation, which such action may include: (i) compliance with proceedings intended to classify the G.O. Bonds as a "qualified bond" within the meaning of Code Section 141(e), or (ii) changing the nature of the use of the Real Property so that none of the net proceeds of the G.O. Bonds will be deemed to be used, directly or indirectly, in an "unrelated trade or business" or for any "private business use" within the meaning of Code Sections 141(b) and 145(a). E. It will not otherwise use any of the SRTS Grant or take, permit or cause to be taken, or omit to take, any action that would adversely affect the exemption from federal income taxation of the interest on the G.O. Bonds, and if it should take, permit or cause to be taken, or omit to take, as appropriate, any such action, it shall take all lawful actions necessary to correct such actions or omissions promptly upon obtaining knowledge thereof. Section 3.03 Changes to G.O. Compliance Legislation or the Commissioner's Order. If Minn. Stat. Sec. 16A.695 or the Commissioner's Order is amended in a manner that reduces any requirement imposed against the Public Entity, or if the Public Entity's interest in the Real Property becomes exempted from Minn. Stat. Sec. 16A.695 and the Commissioner's Order, then upon written request by the Public Entity, MnDOT shall execute an amendment to the Agreement to implement such amendment or exempt the Public Entity's interest in the Real Property from Minn. Stat. Sec. 16A.695 and the Commissioner's Order. Article IV DISBURSEMENT OF GRANT PROCEEDS Section 4.01 The Advances. MnDOT agrees, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein, to make Advances of the SRTS Grant to the Public Entity from time to time in an aggregate total amount not to exceed the amount of the SRTS Grant. If the amount of SRTS Grant that MnDOT cumulatively disburses hereunder to the Public Entity is less than the amount of the SRTS Grant delineated in Section 1.01, then MnDOT and the Public Entity shall enter into and execute whatever documents MnDOT may request in order to amend or modify this Agreement to reduce the amount of the SRTS Grant to the amount actually disbursed. Provided, however, in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 2.11, MnDOT's obligation to make Advances shall terminate as of the dates specified in Section 2.11 even if the entire SRTS Grant has not been disbursed by such dates. Advances shall only be for expenses that (i) are for those items of a capital nature delineated in Source and Use of Funds that is attached as Exhibit A, (ii) accrued no earlier than the effective date of the legislation that appropriated the funds that are used to fund the SRTS Grant, or (iii) have otherwise been consented to, in writing, by the Commissioner. It is the intent of the parties hereto that the rate of disbursement of the Advances shall not exceed the rate of completion of the Project or the rate of disbursement of the matching funds required, if any, under Section 5.13. Therefore, the cumulative amount of all Advances disbursed by the State Entity at any point in time shall not exceed the portion of the Project that has been completed and the percentage of the matching funds required, if any, under Section 5.13 that have been disbursed as of such point in time. This requirement is expressed by way of the following two formulas: Revised October 2024 17 143 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 Formula #1: Cumulative Advances < (Program Grant) x (percentage of matching funds, if any, required under Section 5.13 that have been disbursed) Formula #2: Cumulative Advances < (Program Grant) x (percentage of Project completed) Section 4.02 Draw Requisitions. Whenever the Public Entity desires a disbursement of a portion of the SRTS Grant the Public Entity shall submit to MnDOT a Draw Requisition duly executed on behalf of the Public Entity or its designee. Each Draw Requisition with respect to construction items shall be limited to amounts equal to: (i) the total value of the classes of the work by percentage of completion as approved by the Public Entity and MnDOT, plus (ii) the value of materials and equipment not incorporated in the Project but delivered and suitably stored on or off the Real Property in a manner acceptable to MnDOT, less (iii) any applicable retainage, and less (iv) all prior Advances. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no Advances for materials stored on or off the Real Property will be made by MnDOT unless the Public Entity shall advise MnDOT, in writing, of its intention to so store materials prior to their delivery and MnDOT has not objected thereto. At the time of submission of each Draw Requisition, other than the final Draw Requisition, the Public Entity shall submit to MnDOT such supporting evidence as may be requested by MnDOT to substantiate all payments which are to be made out of the relevant Draw Requisition or to substantiate all payments then made with respect to the Project. The final Draw Requisition shall not be submitted before completion of the Project, including any correction of material defects in workmanship or materials (other than the completion of punch list items). At the time of submission of the final Draw Requisition the Public Entity shall submit to MnDOT: (I) such supporting evidence as may be requested by MnDOT to substantiate all payments which are to be made out of the final Draw Requisition or to substantiate all payments then made with respect to the Project, and (ii) satisfactory evidence that all work requiring inspection by municipal or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction has been duly inspected and approved by such authorities and that all requisite certificates and other approvals have been issued. If on the date an Advance is desired the Public Entity has complied with all requirements of this Agreement and MnDOT approves the relevant Draw Requisition, then MnDOT shall disburse the amount of the requested Advance to the Public Entity. Section 4.03 Additional Funds. If MnDOT shall at any time in good faith determine that the sum of the undisbursed amount of the SRTS Grant plus the amount of all other funds committed to the Project is less than the amount required to pay all costs and expenses of any kind which reasonably may be anticipated in connection with the Project, then MnDOT may send written notice thereof to the Public Entity specifying the amount which must be supplied in order to provide sufficient funds to complete the Project. The Public Entity agrees that it will, within 10 calendar days of receipt of any such notice, supply or have some other entity supply the amount of funds specified in MnDOT's notice. Section 4.04 Condition Precedent to Any Advance. The obligation of MnDOT to make any Advance hereunder (including the initial Advance) shall be subject to the following conditions precedent: A. MnDOT shall have received a Draw Requisition for such Advance specifying the amount of funds being requested, which such amount when added to all prior requests for an Advance shall not exceed the amount of the SRTS Grant set forth in Section 1.01. Revised October 2024 18 144 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 B. No Event of Default under this Agreement or event which would constitute an Event of Default but for the requirement that notice be given or that a period of grace or time elapse shall have occurred and be continuing. C. No determination shall have been made by MnDOT that the amount of funds committed to the Project is less than the amount required to pay all costs and expenses of any kind that may reasonably be anticipated in connection with the Project, or if such a determination has been made and notice thereof sent to the Public Entity under Section 4.03, then the Public Entity has supplied, or has caused some other entity to supply, the necessary funds in accordance with such section or has provided evidence acceptable to MnDOT that sufficient funds are available. D. The State Entity shall have received evidence, in form and substance acceptable to the State Entity, that the Public Entity has sufficient funds to fully and completely pay for the Project and all other expenses that may occur in conjunction therewith. E. The Public Entity has supplied to the State Entity all other items that the State Entity may reasonably require Section 4.05 Processing and Disbursement of Advances. The Public Entity acknowledges and agrees as follows: A. Advances are not made prior to completion of work performed on the Project. B. All Advances are processed on a reimbursement basis. C. The Public Entity must first document expenditures to obtain an Advance. D. Reimbursement requests are made on a partial payment basis or when the Project is completed. E. All payments are made following the "Delegated Contract Process or State Aid Payment Request" as requested and approved by the appropriate district state aid engineer. Section 4.06 Construction Inspections. The Public Entity shall be responsible for making its own inspections and observations regarding the completion of the Project, and shall determine to its own satisfaction that all work done or materials supplied have been properly done or supplied in accordance with all contracts that the Public Entity has entered into regarding the completion of the Project. Article V MISCELLANEOUS Section 5.01 Insurance. If the Public Entity elects to maintain general comprehensive liability insurance regarding the Real Property, then the Public Entity shall have MnDOT named as an additional named insured therein. Section 5.02 Condemnation. If, after the Public Entity has acquired the ownership interest set forth in Section 2.02, all or any portion of the Real Property is condemned to an extent that the Public Entity can no longer comply with Section 2.04, then the Public Entity shall, at its sole option, either: (i) use the condemnation proceeds to acquire an interest in additional real property needed for the Public Entity to continue to comply with Section 2.04 and to provide whatever additional funds that may be needed for such purposes, or (ii) submit a request to MnDOT and the Commissioner to allow it to sell the remaining portion of its interest in the Real Revised October 2024 19 145 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 Property. Any condemnation proceeds which are not used to acquire an interest in additional real property shall be applied in accordance with Minn. Stat. Sec. 16A.695 and the Commissioner's Order as if the Public Entity's interest in the Real Property had been sold. If the Public Entity elects to sell its interest in the portion of the Real Property that remains after the condemnation, such sale must occur within a reasonable time period after the date the condemnation occurred and the cumulative sum of the condemnation and sale proceeds applied in accordance with Minn. Stat. Sec. 16A.695 and the Commissioner's Order. If MnDOT receives any condemnation proceeds referred to herein, MnDOT agrees to or pay over to the Public Entity all of such condemnation proceeds so that the Public Entity can comply with the requirements of this Section. Section 5.03 Use, Maintenance, Repair and Alterations. The Public Entity shall not, without the written consent of MnDOT and the Commissioner, (i) permit or allow the use of any of the Real Property for any purpose other than the purposes specified in Section 2.04, (ii) substantially alter any of the Real Property except such alterations as may be required by laws, ordinances or regulations, or such other alterations as may improve the Real Property by increasing its value or which improve its ability to be used for the purposes set forth in Section 2.04, (iii) take any action which would unduly impair or depreciate the value of the Real Property, (iv) abandon the Real Property, or (v) commit or permit any act to be done in or on the Real Property in violation of any law, ordinance or regulation. If the Public Entity fails to maintain the Real Property in accordance with this Section, MnDOT may perform whatever acts and expend whatever funds necessary to so maintain the Real Property, and the Public Entity irrevocably authorizes MnDOT to enter upon the Real Property to perform such acts as may be necessary to so maintain the Real Property. Any actions taken or funds expended by MnDOT shall be at its sole discretion, and nothing contained herein shall require MnDOT to take any action or incur any expense and MnDOT shall not be responsible, or liable to the Public Entity or any other entity, for any such acts that are performed in good faith and not in a negligent manner. Any funds expended by MnDOT pursuant to this Section shall be due and payable on demand by MnDOT and will bear interest from the date of payment by MnDOT at a rate equal to the lesser of the maximum interest rate allowed by law or 18% per year based upon a 365 -day year. Section 5.04 Recordkeeping and Reporting. The Public Entity shall maintain books and records pertaining to Project costs and expenses needed to comply with the requirements contained herein, Minn. Stat. Sec. 16A.695, the Commissioner's Order, and Minn. Stat. Sec. 174.40 and all rules related thereto, and upon request shall allow MnDOT, its auditors, the Legislative Auditor for the State of Minnesota, or the State Auditor for the State of Minnesota, to inspect, audit, copy, or abstract all of such items. The Public Entity shall use generally accepted accounting principles in the maintenance of such items, and shall retain all of such books and records for a period of six years after the date that the Project is fully completed and placed into operation. Section 5.05 Inspections by MnDOT. The Public Entity shall allow MnDOT to inspect the Real Property upon reasonable request by MnDOT and without interfering with the normal use of the Real Property. Section 5.06 Liability. The Public Entity and MnDOT agree that each will be responsible for its own acts and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law, and neither shall be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof. The liability of MnDOT and the Commissioner is governed by the provisions of Minn. Stat. Sec. 3.736. If the Public Entity is a "municipality" as that term is used in Minn. Stat. Chapter 466, then the liability of the Public Entity is governed by the provisions of Chapter 466. The Public Entity's liability hereunder shall not be limited to the extent of insurance carried by or provided by the Public Entity, or subject to any exclusion from coverage in any insurance policy. Revised October 2024 20 146 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 Section 5.07 Relationship of the Parties. Nothing contained in the Agreement is to be construed as establishing a relationship of co-partners or joint venture among the Public Entity, MnDOT, or the Commissioner, nor shall the Public Entity be considered to be an agent, representative, or employee of MnDOT, the Commissioner, or the State of Minnesota in the performance of the Agreement or the Project. No employee of the Public Entity or other person engaging in the performance of the Agreement or the Project shall be deemed have any contractual relationship with MnDOT, the Commissioner, or the State of Minnesota and shall not be considered an employee of any of those entities. Any claims that may arise on behalf of said employees or other persons out of employment or alleged employment, including claims under the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota, claims of discrimination against the Public Entity or its officers, agents, contractors, or employees shall in no way be the responsibility of MnDOT, the Commissioner, or the State of Minnesota. Such employees or other persons shall not require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights or benefits of any kind whatsoever from MnDOT, the Commissioner, or the State of Minnesota, including tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leave, disability benefits, severance pay and retirement benefits. Section 5.08 Notices. In addition to any notice required under applicable law to be given in another manner, any notices required hereunder must be in writing and personally served or sent by prepaid, registered, or certified mail (return receipt requested), to the address of the party specified below or to such different address as may in the future be specified by a party by written notice to the others: To the Public Entity: At the address indicated on the first page of the Agreement. To MnDOT at: To the Commissioner at: Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of State Aid 395 John Ireland Blvd., MS 500 Saint Paul, MN 55155 Attention: Patti Loken, State Aid Programs Engineer Minnesota Management & Budget 400 Centennial Office Bldg. 658 Cedar St. St. Paul, MN 55155 Attention: Commissioner Section 5.09 Assignment or Modification. Neither the Public Entity nor MnDOT may assign any of its rights or obligations under the Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. Section 5.10 Waiver. Neither the failure by the Public Entity, MnDOT, or the Commissioner, as a third party beneficiary of the Agreement, in one or more instances to insist upon the complete observance or performance of any provision hereof, nor the failure of the Public Entity, MnDOT, or the Commissioner to exercise any right or remedy conferred hereunder or afforded by law shall be construed as waiving any breach of such provision or the right to exercise such right or remedy thereafter. In addition, no delay by any of the Public Entity, MnDOT, or the Commissioner in exercising any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right or remedy preclude other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right or remedy. Section 5.11 Choice of Law and Venue. All matters relating to the validity, interpretation, performance, or enforcement of the Agreement shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. All legal actions arising from any provision of the Agreement shall be initiated and venued in the State of Minnesota District Court located in St. Paul, Minnesota. Revised October 2024 21 147 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 Section 5.12 Severability. If any provision of the Agreement is finally judged by any court to be invalid, then the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect and they shall be interpreted, performed, and enforced as if the invalid provision did not appear herein. Section 5.13 Matching Funds. Any matching funds as shown on Page 1 of the Grant Agreement that are required to be obtained and supplied by the Public Entity must either be in the form of (i) cash monies, (ii) legally binding commitments for money, or (iii) equivalent funds or contributions, including equity, which have been or will be used to pay for the Project. The Public Entity shall supply to MnDOT whatever documentation MnDOT may request to substantiate the availability and source of any matching funds. Section 5.14 Sources and Uses of Funds. The Public Entity represents to MnDOT and the Commissioner that the Sources and Uses of Funds Schedule attached as Exhibit A accurately shows the total cost of the Project and all of the funds that are available for the completion of the Project. The Public Entity will supply any other information and documentation that MnDOT or the Commissioner may request to support or explain any of the information contained in the Sources and Uses of Funds Schedule. If any of the funds shown in the Sources and Uses of Funds Schedule have conditions precedent to the release of such funds, the Public Entity must provide to MnDOT a detailed description of such conditions and what is being done to satisfy such conditions. Section 5.15 Project Completion Schedule. The Public Entity represents to MnDOT and the Commissioner that the Project Completion Schedule attached as Exhibit B correctly and accurately sets forth the projected schedule for the completion of the Project. Section 5.16 Third -Party Beneficiary. The Governmental Program will benefit the State of Minnesota and the provisions and requirements contained herein are for the benefit of both the State Entity and the State of Minnesota. Therefore, the State of Minnesota, by and through its Commissioner of MMB, is and shall be a third -party beneficiary of this Agreement. Section 5.17 Public Entity Tasks. Any tasks that the Agreement imposes upon the Public Entity may be performed by such other entity as the Public Entity may select or designate, provided that the failure of such other entity to perform said tasks shall be deemed to be a failure to perform by the Public Entity. Section 5.18 Data Practices. The Public Entity agrees with respect to any data that it possesses regarding the G.O. Grant or the Project to comply with all of the provisions and restrictions contained in the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act contained in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as such may subsequently be amended or replaced from time to time. Section 5.19 Non -Discrimination. The Public Entity agrees to not engage in discriminatory employment practices regarding the Project and it shall fully comply with all of the provisions contained in Minnesota Statutes Chapters 363A and 181, as such may subsequently be amended or replaced from time to time. Section 5.20 Worker's Compensation. The Public Entity agrees to comply with all of the provisions relating to worker's compensation contained in Minn. Stat. Secs. 176.181 subd. 2 and 176.182, as they may be amended or replaced from time to time with respect to the Project. Section 5.21 Antitrust Claims. The Public Entity hereby assigns to MnDOT and the Commissioner of MMB all claims it may have for over charges as to goods or services provided with respect to the Project that arise under the antitrust laws of the State of Minnesota or of the United States of America. Revised October 2024 22 148 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063012 SAP No. 166-591-001 Section 5.22 Prevailing Wages. The Public Entity agrees to comply with all of the applicable provisions contained in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 177, and specifically those provisions contained in Minn. Stat.§. 177.41 through 177.435 as they maybe amended or replaced from time to time with respect to the Project. By agreeing to this provision, the Public Entity is not acknowledging or agreeing that the cited provisions apply to the Project. Section 5.23 Entire Agreement. The Agreement and all of the exhibits attached thereto embody the entire agreement between the Public Entity and MnDOT, and there are no other agreements, either oral or written, between the Public Entity and MnDOT on the subject matter hereof. Section 5.24 E -Verification. The Public Entity agrees and acknowledges that it is aware of Minn.Stat. § 16C.075 regarding e -verification of employment of all newly hired employees to confirm that such employees are legally entitled to work in the United States, and that it will, if and when applicable, fully comply with such order. Section 5.25 Telecommunications Certification. If federal funds are included in Exhibit A, by signing this agreement, Contractor certifies that, consistent with Section 889 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Pub. L. 115-232 (Aug. 13, 2018), and 2 CFR 200.216, Contractor will not use funding covered by this agreement to procure or obtain, or to extend, renew, or enter into any contract to procure or obtain, any equipment, system, or service that uses "covered telecommunications equipment or services" (as that term is defined in Section 889 of the Act) as a substantial or essential component of any system or as critical technology as part of any system. Contractor will include this certification as a flow down clause in any contract related to this agreement. Section 5.26 Title VI/Non-discrimination Assurances. Public Entity agrees to comply with all applicable US DOT Standard Title VI/Non-Discrimination Assurances contained in DOT Order No. 1050.2A, and in particular Appendices A and E, which can be found at: https://edocs- public.dot.state.mn.us/edocsjublic/DMResultSet/download?docld=11149035. If federal funds are included in Exhibit A, Public Entity will ensure the appendices and solicitation language within the assurances are inserted into contracts as required. MnDOT may conduct a review of the Public Entity's compliance with this provision. The Public Entity must cooperate with MnDOT throughout the review process by supplying all requested information and documentation to MnDOT, making Public Entity staff and officials available for meetings as requested, and correcting any areas of non-compliance as determined by MnDOT. Section 5.27 Electronic Records and Signatures. The parties agree to contract by electronic means. This includes using electronic signatures and converting original documents to electronic records. Section 5.28 Certification. By signing this Agreement, the Grantee certifies that it is not suspended or debarred from receiving federal or state awards. Revised October 2024 23 149 RESOLUTION R2026-077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING A GRANT AGREEMENT FOR THE 2026 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS, CIF -26-010 AND SAP NO. 166-591-001 WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee has applied to the Commissioner of Transportation for a grant from the Safe Routes to Schools Account; and WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation has given notice that funding for this project is available; and WHEREAS, the amount of the grant has been determined to be $272,000.00 by reason of the lowest responsible bid; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA does hereby agree to the terms and conditions of the grant consistent with Minnesota Statutes, section 174.40, and will pay any additional amount by which the cost exceeds the estimate and will return to the Safe Routes to Schools Account any amount appropriated for the project but not required. The proper City officers are authorized to execute a grant agreement and any amendments thereto with the Commissioner of Transportation concerning the above -referenced grant. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 19th day of May 2026. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Prepared by: City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 150 PI°ILA' SHAKOPE E Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.p May 19, 2026 Award low bid contract to Building Restoration for Masonry Restoration at Schroeder House. Michael Kerski, Planning and Development Director Michael Kerski Action to be considered: Approve Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: The renovation of these structures was initially bid as a comprehensive project; however, due to the age and condition of the buildings, the contingency costs proposed by general contractors were significantly higher than anticipated. As a result, it was recommended that the project be divided into phases, beginning with stabilization and restoration of the exterior building envelope where the greatest structural and water infiltration risks exist. Interior improvements, which are primarily mechanical, electrical, and standard finish work, can then be completed separately through more conventional contracting methods. Working in coordination with City staff, Miller Dunwiddie solicited competitive bids specifically for the masonry repair and replacement portion of the project. Multiple qualified masonry restoration contractors submitted proposals. The recommended contractor, Building Restoration Corporation, has more than 40 years of experience restoring historic and landmark structures, including Landmark Center, Enger Tower, and Guardian Building. The firm has extensive experience working with historic soft brick materials similar to the original Shakopee brick and has conducted a detailed assessment of the structures. City staff and the project architects intend to utilize salvaged Shakopee brick currently in storage in combination with a custom -manufactured replacement brick to complete the exterior masonry restoration. Separating the masonry work from the broader renovation project is expected to result in substantial cost savings compared to utilizing a general contractor for the entire scope. City staff and the project architect will oversee construction activities, with the masonry restoration phase anticipated to take approximately one month to complete. 151 The next phase of the project anticipated for bidding will be replacement of the building roofs. Recommendation: Approve contract with Building Restoration Corporation for $126,314 plus $10,000 contingency and an additional $3,500 to Brick Works Supply for Glengery matching replacement bricks. Budget Impact: Funded out of Park Development funds. Attachments: Schroeder House Bid Form.pdf 152 City of Shakopee 100% Construction Documents December 15, 2025 Schroeder House & Livery Rehabilitation MASONRY RESTORATION DOCUMENT 00 41 13 - MASONRY RESTORATION BID FORM - STIPULATED SUM (SINGLE -PRIME CONTRACT) 1.1 BID INFORMATION A. Bidder: Building Restoration Corporation B. Project Name: Schroeder House and Livery — MASONRY RESTORATION. C. Project Location: Shakopee, Minnesota. D. Architect: Miller Dunwiddie. E. Architect's Project Number: SKP2501. 1.2 BID A. Base Bid, Single -Prime (All Trades) Contract: The undersigned Bidder, having carefully examined the Procurement and Contracting Requirements, Conditions of the Contract, Drawings, Specifications, and all subsequent Addenda, as prepared by Miller Dunwiddie, having visited the site, and being familiar with all conditions and requirements of the Work, hereby agrees to furnish all material, labor, equipment and services, including all scheduled allowances, necessary to complete the construction of the above -named project, according to the requirements of the Procurement and Contracting Documents, for the Total Base Bid amount of: Item No. Item Price 01 Subtotal — Masonry Restoration for Schroeder House $ 49,724.00 02 Subtotal — Masonry Restoration for Livery $ 76,590.00 TOTAL BASE BID $126,314.00 One Hundred Twenty Six Thousand Three Hundred Fourteen Dollars 1.3 REQUIRED BID ATTACHMENTS A. 004113 — Bid Form Attachment A — First Tier Subcontractor List B. 004213 — Experience and Qualifications Forms C. 004313 — Bid Security Form (Bid Bond Form — AIA Document A310-2010) 1.4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ADDENDA A. The undersigned Bidder acknowledges receipt of and use of the following Addenda in the preparation of this Bid: 1. Addendum No. 1, dated April 2nd, 2026 2. Addendum No. 2, dated 3. Addendum No. 3, dated 4. Addendum No. 4, dated SKP2501 - Miller Dunwiddie BID FORM - STIPULATED SUM (SINGLE -PRIME CONTRACT) Document 00 41 13 -1 153 City of Shakopee Schroeder House & Livery Rehabilitation 100% Construction Documents December 15, 2025 MASONRY RESTORATION 1.5 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION SCHEDULE 1. Provide a proposed schedule for work to be performed below, assuming a Notice to Proceed May 1, 2026 and Substantial Completion October 31, 2026. A schedule in a different format attached to the bid form is acceptable. Milestone Tentative Target Dates Complete First Building May 15th, 2026 Complete Project May 29th, 2026 1.6 UNIT PRICES A. Unit Price No. 040100-1 —Additional Brick Masonry Unit Replacement. Thirty Eight dollars ($ 38.00 ) per unit. B. Unit Price No. 040100-2 — Additional Mortar Replacement. Twenty Seven dollars ($ 27.00 per square foot. SKP2501 - Miller Dunwiddie BID FORM - STIPULATED SUM (SINGLE -PRIME CONTRACT) Document 00 41 13 - 2 154 City of Shakopee Schroeder House & Livery Rehabilitation MASONRY RESTORATION 100% Construction Documents December 15, 2025 1.7 SUBMISSION OF BID A. Respectfully submitted this 8th day of April , 20 26. B. Submitted By: Building Restoration Corporation (Name of bidding firm or corporation). C. Authorized Signature: �`� `�` ��`� " (Handwritten signature). D. Signed By: Dale Zoerb (Type or print name). E. Title: President (Owner/Partner/PresidentNice President). F. Witness By: ' 0 A0L (Handwritten signature). G. Attest: (Handwritten signature). H. By: Dale Zoerb (Type or print name). I. Title: It's Secretary (Corporate Secretary or Assistant Secretary). J. Street Address: 1920 Oakcrest Ave, Suite 1 K. City, State, Zip: Roseville, MN 55113 L. Phone: 612-789-2800 M. License No.: BC604421 END OF DOCUMENT 00 41 13 SKP2501 - Miller Dunwiddie BID FORM - STIPULATED SUM (SINGLE -PRIME CONTRACT) Document 00 41 13 - 3 155 City of Shakopee 100% Construction Documents December 15, 2025 Schroeder House & Livery Rehabilitation MASONRY RESTORATION (This Page Left Intentionally Blank) SKP2501 - Miller Dunwiddie BID FORM - STIPULATED SUM (SINGLE -PRIME CONTRACT) Document 00 41 13 - 4 156 City of Shakopee Schroeder House & Livery Rehabilitation 100% Construction Documents December 15, 2025 MASONRY RESTORATION ATTACHMENT A FIRST -TIER SUBCONTRACTOR LIST (Prime Contractor Submit with Bid) A list in a different format attached to the bid form is acceptable. First -Tier Subcontractor Names (Legal name of company as registered with the Secretary of State) Name of city where company home office is located SKP2501 - Miller Dunwiddie BID FORM - STIPULATED SUM (SINGLE -PRIME CONTRACT) Document 00 41 13 - 5 157 City of Shakopee 100% Construction Documents December 15, 2025 Schroeder House & Livery Rehabilitation MASONRY RESTORATION (This Page Left Intentionally Blank) SKP2501 - Miller Dunwiddie BID FORM - STIPULATED SUM (SINGLE -PRIME CONTRACT) Document 00 41 13 - 6 158 SHAKOPEE WILLA! Shakopee City Council 5.q May 19, 2026 Agenda Item: Approve the Liquor License Renewals for 2026-2027 Prepared by: Heidi Emerson, Deputy City Clerk Reviewed by: Action to be considered: Approve the Liquor License Renewals for 2026-2027 and waive the requirements of city code section 114.02 (I) for Global Restaurant Group dba Dangerfield's and Stonebrooke Golf Club LLC., conditioned upon compliance with all licensing requirements. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: Liquor license renewal applications were sent to license holders in April for completion. The applications have been completed, and all inspections that are required by city code will be completed by the Fire Department throughout the year. All paperwork must be in order, and all fees must be paid in full prior to issuance of the license. In accordance with section 114.02 (I) of the city code, no on -sale liquor license shall be granted for operation on any premises which does not have city water. The City Council may waive this requirement for any business having obtained an on -sale license prior to July 1, 1997, or a business that is operating at a premises where potable water is supplied from a well, as long as their water quality from the well is tested and approved by the Minnesota Department of Health. Staff has contacted the Minnesota Department of Health and Environmental Services regarding the wells at Global Restaurant Group dba Dangerfield's and Stonebrooke Golf Club to verify that they have been tested and meet water quality standards. Recommendation: Approve the above requested motion. Budget Impact: N/A 159 Attachments: 2026-2027 Liquor license holders 160 2026-2027 Liquor License Holders American Legion Club Applebees Arnie's Friendly Folks Club Babe's Place Badger Hill Trackside Hospitality dba Boardwalk Bravis Modern Street Food Canterbury Park Chilli's Bar & Grill Cub Foods #6689 Cub Liquor#6691 Dangerfield's Don Ramon Bun Mee Vietnamese Baguette El Gallo Loco El Toro Mexican Restaurant Holiday Stationstores Inc. Holiday Stationstores Inc. Holiday Stationstores Inc. Holiday Stationstores Inc. Hy-Vee Grocery Hy-Vee Wine & Spirits Joe Schleper Stadium Fund Kwik Trip #441 Kwik Trip #447 Las Brasas dba El Fogon Los Ranchos Mercado Mallards Restaurant Mana Brewing (On Sale) Mana Brewing (Taproom) Marcus Southbridge Crossing Cinema McCoys Copper Pint Merwin's Liquors Mr. Pig's Smokery Muddy Cow Bar & Grill Mystic Lake Amphitheater O'Brien's Public House Old Southern BBQ Pablo's Mexican Restaurant Pullman Club Riverside Liquors 1266 1st Avenue East/Box 262 1568 Vierling Drive East 122 1st Avenue East 124 Holmes Street S 2805 Winners Circle Drive 1125 Shenandoah Drive 2815 Winners Circle Drive 1100 Canterbury Road 8098 Old Carriage Court 1198 Vierling Drive East 1262 Vierling Drive East 1583 1st Avenue East 1561 1st Avenue East 4135 Dean Lakes Blvd. 911 1st Avenue East 1120 1st Avenue East 3901 Eagle Creek Blvd 1381 Greenwood Court 444 1st Avenue East 1605 Windermere Way 1451 Adams Street South 1451 Adams Street South Suite B 13139 Preserve Court 1522 Vierling Drive East 8225 Crossings Blvd 1555 1st Avenue East 590 Marschall Road 180 N. Atwood Street 129 S. Holmes Street 129 S. Holmes Street 8380 Hansen Avenue 1710 Crossings Blvd 471 Marschall Road South 2875 Winners Circle Drive 1244 Canterbury Road 712 Canterbury Rd 338 1st Avenue East 8088 Old Carriage Court 230 Lewis Street 124 1st Avenue West 507 1st Avenue East 161 Ruby's Family Restaurant Sam's Club #6311 Sapporo Sapporo Shakopee Aerie Shakopee Ballroom Shakopee Brew Hall Shakopee VFW Post Shakopee Wine Cellars Soi 21 Asian Bar and Bistro Inc Southbridge Liquor Southside Liquors Stonebrooke Golf Club SuperAmerica #4035 SuperAmerica #4546 SuperAmerica #8510 Texas Roadhouse Tommy's Malt Shop The Golf Garage Tokyo Sushi & Grill Japanese Tokyo Sushi & Grill Japanese Turtle's Bar & Grill Valleyfair Walmart #3513 1205 1st Avenue East 8201 Old Carriage Court 1114 Vierling Drive East 1114 Vierling Drive East 220 2nd Avenue West 2400 4th Avenue East 126 1st Avenue East 1201 3rd Avenue East 4041 Dean Lakes Blvd 8048 Old Carriage Court 8071 Old Carriage Court 1667 17th Avenue East/Suite 101 2693 County Road 79 1155 1st Avenue East 1298 Vierling Drive East 1195 Canterbury Road 8160 Old Carriage Court 1101 Adams Street South 1282 Vierling Drive East 8080 Old Carriage Court North 8080 Old Carriage Court North 132 1st Avenue East 1 Valleyfair Drive 8101 Old Carriage Court 162 WILLA! SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.r May 19, 2026 Authorize Submittal of a Railroad Crossing Elimination Grant Application Alex Jordan, City Engineer Action to be considered: Adopt Resolution R2026-082, Approving an Application to the Federal Railroad Administration for the Railroad Crossing Elimination Program and Approving a State Funded Program for IIJA Discretionary Grant Assistance, and accept a proposal from SRF Consulting, Inc. for preparation of the grant application. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) established the Railroad Crossing Elimination (RCE) Grant Program, with funding made available by the FY2025 and FY2026 Advance Appropriations in Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). Over $1.1 billion is available in FY2025-2026 to fund eligible projects for highway -rail or pathway -rail grade crossing improvements that focus on improving safety and mobility of people and goods. The City of Shakopee is applying for funding to construct railroad crossing safety improvements within Downtown Shakopee, with the ultimate goal of establishing a Quiet Zone. The proposed safety improvements would be located at the intersections of Minnesota Street and Market Street with 2nd Avenue. The MnDOT IIJA Discretionary Match Program was established in 2021, and is available to cities to provide technical assistance in preparing grant applications for IIJA funded projects. The City was successful in receiving $30,000 from MnDOT through the IIJA Discretionary Match Program to fully fund the grant application preparation. The City must enter into a Grant Agreement with MnDOT to recieve the reimbursement. SRF's proposal identifies the scope of services and estimated cost to assist the City in preparing the RCE Grant application. SRF has the experience, technical skill and capacity to prepare the application and is part of the City's approved consultant pool. 163 Recommendation: Adopt Resolution R2026-082 Budget Impact: The City will be reimbursed by MnDOT for 100% of the costs to prepare the grant application. If the City is successful in receiving an RCE Grant from the FRA, a 20% local match will be required which will be funded out of the Capital Improvement Fund. Attachments: 166-589-002_FY 26 RCE Grant_SRF Proposal.pdf R2026-082.docx 166-589-002llJATechAssistAgreeCOMPLETE.pdf 164 SRF SRF Project No. 20492.PP May 13, 2026 Alex Jordan, City Engineer City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN, 55379 Subject: Proposal for Professional Services for: FY 26 Railroad Crossing Elimination (RCE) Program Grant Application for ID (166-589-002) Dear Alex, As requested, SRF is pleased to submit this proposal to provide professional services to develop a FY 26 Railroad Crossing Elimination (RCE) Program Grant Application for the City of Shakopee. Scope of Services SRF proposes to carry out the Scope of Services, described as follows: Task 1 — Project Management/Meetings This task assumes management of daily work activities, tasks and meetings, monitor budget, provide monthly billings, and maintain communications with City of Shakopee staff during the project duration. This task also includes QA/QC for all product deliverables, including graphics, grant narrative, and attachments. In addition, SRF will arrange and participate in up to three project meetings (MS Teams) with City of Shakopee staff and/or other stakeholders with pertinent information or useful data critical to application requirements. Meetings are expected at the following milestones: • Kickoff Meeting to discuss communication protocol, application outline, review in -hand and data needs list, NOFO criteria, share webinar detail and establish project milestone schedule. • Review of draft grant narrative, graphics, tables, charts, and final data needs. • Presentation and review of final document In addition to the meetings above, SRF will work with the City of Shakopee throughout the application process to request, collect/review supplemental supporting documents. Coordination and dialogue will occur primarily over email. www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 I Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 1763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 165 Alex Jordan City of Shakopee Task 2 — Application Preparation May 13, 2026 Page 2 of 3 The deadline to submit the RCE application in Monday, June 8, 2026, at (10:59 pm CDT). Prepare draft application by Thursday, May 29, 2026, for review and comment by City of Shakopee staff (revise within three working days, have all comments collected and back to SRF by the end of day, Tuesday, June 2, 2026, and assume only one draft revision). All resolutions, letters of support, etc. will be gathered and assembled into the final application. An application cover sheet will also be provided. Prepare graphics/tables, final document formatting and links for the website. Prepare the final application for submittal to USDOT Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) on Thursday, June 4, 2026. Documentation, supporting application assertions, etc. will be provided by the City of Shakopee for relevant information, and SRF will add these to the website created by SRF. All resolutions, letters of support, etc., will be gathered and assembled into the final application. The final application will follow the guidance provided by USDOT and the FRA Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO), and grant webinar. Task 3 — Graphics/Website Prepare graphics/tables, final document formatting, and links for the website. Assumptions Below is a list of assumptions for this proposal: • SRF will prepare and circulate a data needs table for City of Shakopee staff to identify data/documents that may be helpful with the application. • SRF will provide letters of support and resolutions templates, but the City will be responsible for distributing and securing letters of support for the project. • City will be responsible for preparing necessary SF -424 forms to supplement the grant application and fulfill submittal requirements. SRF will be able to assist. • City will ensure registration with Grants.gov and will be responsible for submitting the final application prior to June 8, 2026 at 10:59 pm deadline. Schedule SRF will fulfill all work described above in the Scope of Work by June 8, 2026. Basis of Payment/Budget We propose to be reimbursed for our services on an hourly basis for actual time expended. Other direct project expenses, such as printing, supplies, reproduction, video processing, etc., will be billed at cost and mileage will be billed at the current allowable IRS rate for business miles. Invoices are submitted on a monthly basis for work performed during the previous month. Payment is due SRF 166 Alex Jordan City of Shakopee May 13, 2026 Page 3 of 3 within 30 days. Based on our understanding of the project, the cost of our services is not to exceed $30,000, which includes both time and expenses. Changes in Scope of Services It is understood that if the scope or extent of work changes, the cost will be adjusted accordingly. Before any out -of -scope work is initiated, however, SRF will submit a budget request for the new work and will not begin work until you provide authorization. Standard Terms and Conditions We propose to perform this work in a manner consistent with the terms of the Master Agreement for Professional Consulting Services dated August 7, 2024. That agreement, together with this proposal for professional services, constitute the entire agreement between the Client and SRF and supersede all prior written or oral understandings. This agreement may only be amended, supplemented, modified, or canceled by a written instrument executed by both parties. Acceptance/Notice to Proceed A signed copy of this Proposal, mailed or emailed to our office, will serve as acceptance of this proposal and SRF's notice to proceed. The email address is pchellevold@srfconsulting.com. We appreciate your consideration of this Proposal and look forward to working with you on this project. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Paul Chellevold, AICP Director — Funding and Grants Approved: (signature) Name Title Date (signature) Name Title Date 166-589-002_FY 26 RCE Grant SRF Proposal.docx SRF 167 RESOLUTION R2026-082 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION RAILROAD CROSSING ELIMINATION PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION AND APPROVING A STATE FUNDED PROGRAM FOR IIJA DISCRETIONARY GRANT ASSISTANCE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SAP NO. 166-589-002 WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee supports the submission of an application to the Federal Railroad Administration Railroad Crossing Elimination (RCE) Program for grant funding; and WHEREAS, the grant application seeks funding for railroad crossing safety improvements at the intersections of Minnesota Street and Market Street with 2nd Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee recognizes that a 20 percent local match is required and will be funded through the City's Capital Improvement Fund; and WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation has given notice that funding is available to provide technical assistance in preparing the grant application; and WHEREAS, the amount of the technical assistance grant has been determined to be $ 30,000.00; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: 1. That, if the City of Shakopee is awarded a grant by the Federal Railroad Administration the City of Shakopee agrees to accept the grant award and may enter into an agreement for the above - referenced project. The City of Shakopee will comply with all applicable laws, requirements, and regulations as stated in the grant agreement. 2. That the City of Shakopee does hereby agree to the terms and conditions of the technical assistance grant consistent with Minnesota Laws 2023, Chapter 68, Article 1, Section 2, Subdivision 5(a); will pay any additional amount by which the cost exceeds the estimate; and will return any amount appropriated for the project but not required. The appropriate City officers are authorized to execute the grant agreement and any amendments thereto with the Commissioner of Transportation concerning the technical assistance grant. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 19th day of May 2026. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Prepared by: City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 168 m� DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MnDOT Agreement No. 1063337 SAP No. 166-589-002 STATE OF MINNESOTA FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION GRANTS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND IIJA DISCRETIONARY MATCH GRANT AGREEMENT This Grant Agreement (the "Agreement") is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Transportation ("State"), and ("Grantee"): Public Entity (Grantee) name, address and contact person: City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Contact: William H. Reynolds, City Administrator RECITALS 1. General Funds were appropriated to provide grants for technical assistance to a requesting local unit of government that seeks to submit an application for a federal discretionary grant for a transportation -related purpose in Minnesota Laws 2023, Chapter 68, Article 1, Section 2, Subdivision 5(a). 2. General Funds were appropriated to make state funded grants to a federal grant recipient in Minnesota Laws 2023, Chapter 68, Article 1, Section 2, Subdivision 5(a). 3. Grantee has been awarded Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match funds in session law as noted above. 4. Grantee represents that it is duly qualified and agrees to perform all services described in this Agreement to the satisfaction of State. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, Subd. 1, Grantee agrees that administrative costs must be necessary and reasonable as a condition of this Agreement. AGREEMENT TERMS 1 Term of Agreement, Survival of Terms, and Incorporation of Exhibits 1.1 Effective Date. This agreement will be effective on the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minn. Stat.§ 16B.98, Subd. 5. As required by Minn.Stat.§ 16B.98 Subd. 7, no payments will be made to Grantee until this agreement is fully executed. Grantee must not begin work under this agreement until this agreement is fully executed and Grantee has been notified by the State's Authorized Representative to begin the work. 1.2 Expiration Date. This agreement will expire on December 31, 2028 , or when all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. 1.3 Survival of Terms. All clauses which impose obligations continuing in their nature and which must survive in order to give effect to their meaning will survive the expiration or termination of this agreement, including, without limitation, the following clauses: 8. Liability; 9. State Audits; 10. Government Data Practices; 11. Workers Compensation; 12. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; and 14. Data Disclosure. 1.4 Exhibits. Exhibit A: Sources and Uses of Funds Schedule; Exhibit B: Grant Application; and Exhibit C: Grantee Resolution Approving Grant Agreement are attached and incorporated into this agreement. 2 Grantee's Duties 2.1 Grantee will conduct activities in accordance with its grant application, or in the case of legislatively selected projects, in accordance with the enabling session law. Collectively, activities set forth in the grant project application and/or the enabling session law will be referred to as the "Project". See Exhibit B. 2.2 Grantee will comply with all required grants management policies and procedures set forth through Minn. Stat. § 16B.97, Subd. 4 (a) (1). 2.3 Asset Monitoring. If Grantee uses funds obtained by this agreement to acquire a capital asset, the Grantee is required to use that asset for a public purpose for the normal useful life of the asset. Grantee may not sell or change the purpose of use for the capital asset(s) obtained with grant funds under this agreement without the prior written 169 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) MnDOT Agreement No. 1063337 SAP No. 166-589-002 consent of the State and an agreement executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this agreement, or their successors in office. 3 Time 3.1 Grantee must comply with all the time requirements described in this Agreement. In the performance of this grant Agreement, time is of the essence. 4 Consideration and Payment 4.1 Consideration. State will pay for all services performed by Grantee under this Agreement as follows: 4.1.1 Compensation. Grantee will be reimbursed for actual, incurred costs that are eligible under Minn. Stat. § 174.38. Grantee shall use this grant solely to reimburse itself for expenditures it has already made to pay for the costs of one or more of the activities listed under section 2.1. 4.1.2 Sources and Uses of Funds. Grantee represents to State that the Sources and Uses of Funds Schedule attached as Exhibit A accurately shows the total cost of the Project and all of the funds that are available for the completion of the Project. Grantee agrees that it will pay for any costs that are ineligible for reimbursement and for any amount by which the costs exceed State's total obligation in section 4.1.3. Grantee will return to State any amount appropriated but not required. 4.1.3 Total Obligation. The total obligation of State for all compensation and reimbursements to Grantee under this Agreement will not exceed $30,000.00. 4.2 Payment 4.2.1 Invoices. Grantee will submit state aid pay requests for reimbursements requested under this Agreement. State will promptly pay Grantee after Grantee presents an itemized invoice for the services actually performed and State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. 4.2.2 All Invoices Subject to Audit. All invoices are subject to audit, at State's discretion. 4.2.3 State's Payment Requirements. State will promptly pay all valid obligations under this Agreement as required by Minn. Stat. § 16A.124. State will make undisputed payments no later than thirty (30) days after receiving Grantee's invoices and progress reports for services performed. If an invoice is incorrect, defective or otherwise improper, State will notify Grantee within ten (10) days of discovering the error. After State receives the corrected invoice, State will pay Grantee within thirty (30) days of receipt of such invoice. 4.2.4 Grant Monitoring Visit and Financial Reconciliation. During the period of performance, State will make at least annual monitoring visits and conduct annual financial reconciliations of Grantee's expenditures. 4.2.4.1 State's Authorized Representative will notify Grantee's Authorized Representative where and when any monitoring visit and financial reconciliation will take place, which State employees and/or contractors will participate, and which Grantee staff members should be present. Grantee will be provided with at least seven (7) calendar days of notice prior to any monitoring visit or financial reconciliation. 4.2.4.2 Following a monitoring visit or financial reconciliation, Grantee will take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies identified by State. 4.2.4.3 At least one monitoring visit and one financial reconciliation must be completed prior to final payment being made to Grantee. 4.2.5 Unexpended Funds. Grantee must promptly return to State at grant closeout any unexpended funds that have not been accounted for in a financial report submitted to State. 4.2.6 Closeout. State will determine, at its sole discretion, whether a closeout audit is required prior to final payment approval. If a closeout audit is required, final payment will be held until the audit has been completed. Monitoring of any capital assets acquired with grant funds will continue following grant closeout. 4.3 Contracting and Bidding Requirements. If Grantee is a municipality as defined by Minn. Stat. § 471.345, Subd. 1, then Grantee shall comply with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 471.345 for all procurement under this Agreement. 5 Conditions of Payment All services provided by Grantee under this Agreement must be performed to State's satisfaction, as determined at the sole discretion of State's Authorized Representative and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations. Grantee will not receive payment for work found by State to be unsatisfactory or 170 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) MnDOT Agreement No. 1063337 SAP No. 166-589-002 performed in violation of federal, state, or local law. 6 Authorized Representatives 6.1 State's Authorized Representative is: Marc Briese, Programs Manager, MnDOT State Aid Office 395 John Ireland Boulevard, MS 500 St. Paul, MN 55155 Office: 651-366-3802 marc.briese@state.mn.us or his/her successor. State's Authorized Representative has the responsibility to monitor Grantee's performance and the authority to accept the services provided under this agreement. If the services are satisfactory, State's Authorized Representative will certify acceptance on each invoice submitted for payment. 6.2 Grantee's Authorized Representative is: William H. Reynolds, City Administrator 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 952-233-9311 BReynolds@ShakopeeMN.Gov if Grantee's Authorized Representative changes at any time during this Agreement, Grantee will immediately notify State. 7 Assignment Amendments, Waiver, and Grant Agreement Complete 7.1 Assignment. Grantee may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of State and a fully executed Assignment Agreement, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this Agreement, or their successors in office. 7.2 Amendments. Any amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original agreement, or their successors in office. 7.3 Waiver. If State fails to enforce any provision of this Agreement, that failure does not waive the provision or State's right to subsequently enforce it. 7.4 Grant Agreement Complete. This Agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between State and Grantee. No other understanding regarding this Agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. 7.5 Electronic Records and Signatures. The parties agree to contract by electronic means. This includes using electronic signatures and converting original documents to electronic records. 7.6 Certification. By signing this Agreement, Grantee certifies that it is not suspended or debarred from receiving federal or state awards. 8 Liability Grantee and State agree that each will be responsible for its own acts and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law, and neither shall be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof The liability of State is governed by the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 3.736. If Grantee is a "municipality" as that term is used in Minn. Stat. Chapter 466, then the liability of Grantee is governed by the provisions of Chapter 466. Grantee's liability hereunder shall not be limited to the extent of insurance carried by or provided by Grantee, or subject to any exclusion from coverage in any insurance policy. 9 State Audits Under Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, Subd.8, the Grantee's books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) 171 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063337 SAP No. 166-589-002 of Grantee, or other party relevant to this Agreement or transaction, are subject to examination by State and/or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, the Attorney General, as appropriate, for a minimum of six (6) years from the end of this Agreement, receipt and approval of all final reports, or the required period of time to satisfy all state and program retention requirements, whichever is later. Grantee will take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies identified by an audit. 10 Government Date Practices Grantee and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by State under this Agreement, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Grantee under this agreement. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either Grantee or State. 11 Workers' Compensation Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Minn. Stat. § 176.181, Subd. 2, pertaining to workers' compensation insurance coverage. Grantee's employees and agents will not be considered State employees. Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act on behalf of these employees and any claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of these employees are in no way State's obligation or responsibility. 12 Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue Minnesota law, without regard to its choice -of -law provisions, governs this Agreement. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this Agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 13 Termination; Suspension 13.1 Termination by the State. State may terminate this Agreement with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Grantee. Upon termination, Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. If funding is canceled, withdrawn, or terminated, State may suspend its performance until funding is restored. Suspension of performance does not release State from its obligations under the agreement. 13.2 Termination for Cause. State may immediately terminate this grant Agreement if State finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement, that reasonable progress has not been made, that fraudulent or wasteful activity has occurred, that Grantee has been convicted of a criminal offense relating to a state grant agreement, or that the purposes for which the funds were granted have not been or will not be fulfilled. State may take action to protect the interests of the State of Minnesota, including the refusal to disburse additional funds and requiring the return of all or part of the funds already disbursed. 13.3 Termination for Insufficient Funding. State may immediately terminate this Agreement if: 13.3.1 It does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature; or 13.3.2 If funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination must be by written or fax notice to Grantee. State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination. However, Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. State will not be assessed any penalty if the Agreement is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source, not to appropriate funds. State will provide the Grantee notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of State's receiving that notice. 13.4 Suspension. State may immediately suspend this Agreement in the event of a total or partial government shutdown due to the failure to have an approved budget by the legal deadline. Work performed by Grantee during a period of suspension will be deemed unauthorized and undertaken at risk of non-payment. 14 Data Disclosure Under Minn. Stat. § 270C.65, Subd. 3, and other applicable law, Grantee consents to disclosure of its social security number, federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action requiring Grantee to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any. CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) 172 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063337 SAP No. 166-589-002 15 Fund Use Prohibited. Grantee will not utilize any funds received pursuant to this Agreement to compensate, either directly or indirectly, any contractor, corporation, partnership, or business, however organized, which is disqualified or debarred from entering into or receiving a State contract. This restriction applies regardless of whether the disqualified or debarred party acts in the capacity of a general contractor, a subcontractor, or as an equipment or material supplier. This restriction does not prevent Grantee from utilizing these funds to pay any party who might be disqualified or debarred after Grantee's contract award on this Project. 16 Discrimination Prohibited by Minnesota Statutes § 181.59. Grantee will comply with the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 181.59 which requires that every contract for or on behalf of the State of Minnesota, or any county, city, town, township, school, school district or any other district in the state, for materials, supplies or construction will contain provisions by which Contractor agrees: 1) That, in the hiring of common or skilled labor for the performance of any work under any contract, or any subcontract, no Contractor, material supplier or vendor, will, by reason of race, creed or color, discriminate against the person or persons who are citizens of the United States or resident aliens who are qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates; 2) That no Contractor, material supplier, or vendor, will, in any manner, discriminate against, or intimidate, or prevent the employment of any person or persons identified in clause 1 of this section, or on being hired, prevent or conspire to prevent, the person or persons from the performance of work under any contract on account of race, creed or color; 3) That a violation of this section is a misdemeanor; and 4) That this contract may be canceled or terminated by the state of Minnesota, or any county, city, town, township, school, school district or any other person authorized to grant contracts for employment, and all money due, or to become due under the contract, may be forfeited for a second or any subsequent violation of the terms or conditions of this Agreement. 17 Limitation. Under this Agreement, State is only responsible for receiving and disbursing funds. Nothing in this Agreement will be construed to make State a principal, co -principal, partner, or joint venturer with respect to the Project(s) covered herein. State may provide technical advice and assistance as requested by Grantee, however, Grantee will remain responsible for providing direction to its contractors and consultants and for administering its contracts with such entities. Grantee's consultants and contractors are not intended to be third party beneficiaries of this Agreement. 18 Additional Provisions 18.1 Prevailing Wages. Grantee agrees to comply with all of the applicable provisions contained in Minn. Stat. Chapter 177, and specifically those provisions contained in Minn. Stat. § 177.41 through 177.435 as they may be amended or replaced from time to time with respect to the Project. By agreeing to this provision, Grantee is not acknowledging or agreeing that the cited provisions apply to the Project. 18.2 E -Verification. Grantee agrees and acknowledges that it is aware of Minn. Stat. § 16C.075 regarding e -verification of employment of all newly hired employees to confirm that such employees are legally entitled to work in the United States, and that it will, if and when applicable, fully comply with such order. 18.3 Telecommunications Certification. If federal funds are included in Exhibit A, by signing this Agreement, Grantee certifies that, consistent with Section 889 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Pub. L. 115-232 (Aug. 13, 2018), Grantee does not and will not use any equipment, system, or service that uses "covered telecommunications equipment or services" (as that term is defined in Section 889 of the Act) as a substantial or essential component of any system or as critical technology as part of any system. Grantee will include this certification as a flow down clause in any contract related to this Agreement. 18.4 Title VI/Non-discrimination Assurances. Grantee agrees to comply with all applicable US DOT Standard Title VI/Non-Discrimination Assurances contained in DOT Order No. 1050.2A, and in particular Appendices A and E, which can be found at: https://edocs-public.dot.state.mn.us/edocs public/DMResultSet/download?docId=11149035. If federal funds are included in Exhibit A, Grantee will ensure the appendices and solicitation language within the assurances are inserted into contracts as required. State may conduct a review of the Grantee's compliance with this provision. Grantee must cooperate with State throughout the review process by supplying all requested information and documentation to 173 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) MnDOT Agreement No. 1063337 SAP No. 166-589-002 State, making Grantee staff and officials available for meetings as requested, and correcting any areas of non- compliance as determined by State. 18.5 Use, Maintenance, Repair and Alterations. The Grantee shall not, without the written consent of the State and the Commissioner, (i) permit or allow the use of any of the property improved with these grants funds (the "Real Property") for any purpose other than in conjunction with or for the operation of a county highway, county state -aid highway, town road, or city street and for other uses customarily associated therewith, such as trails and utility corridors, (ii) substantially alter any of the Real Property except such alterations as may be required by laws, ordinances or regulations, or such other alterations as may improve the Real Property by increasing its value or which improve its ability to be used for the purposes set forth in section (i), (iii) take any action which would unduly impair or depreciate the value of the Real Property, (iv) abandon the Real Property, or (v) commit or permit any act to be done in or on the Real Property in violation of any law, ordinance or regulation. If Grantee fails to maintain the Real Property in accordance with this Section, State may perform whatever acts and expend whatever funds necessary to so maintain the Real Property, and Grantee irrevocably authorizes State to enter upon the Real Property to perform such acts as may be necessary to so maintain the Real Property. Any actions taken or funds expended by State shall be at its sole discretion, and nothing contained herein shall require State to take any action or incur any expense and State shall not be responsible, or liable to Grantee or any other entity, for any such acts that are performed in good faith and not in a negligent manner. Any funds expended by State pursuant to this Section shall be due and payable on demand by State and will bear interest from the date of payment by State at a rate equal to the lesser of the maximum interest rate allowed by law or 18% per year based upon a 365 -day year. 18.6 Grant Administrator and Organizational Leadership Contact Information. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, Subd. 5(d), if grantee has a website, the names and contact information for the grant administrator(s) and organization's leadership must be clearly published. 'The remainder of this page has intentionally been left blank.] CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) '174 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063337 SAP No. 166-589-002 GRANTEE The Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the grant agreement on behalf of the Grantee as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances. By: Title: Date: By: Title: Date: By: Title: Date: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Approval and Certifying Encumbrance as required by Minnesota Statutes § 16A.15 and 16C.05 By: State Aid Programs Manager (with delegated authority) Date: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT MANAGEMENT By: Date: 7 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) 175 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063337 SAP No. 166-589-002 EXHIBIT A SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS SCHEDULE SOURCES OF FUNDS USES OF FUNDS Entity Supplying Funds Amount Expenses State Funds: 2023 IIJA Tech Assistance Funds Grant (SAAS Acct 413) Amount Items Paid for with $30,000.00 IIJA Grant Funds: Other: Subtotal Engineering $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Subtotal Public Entity Funds: Matching Funds $30,000.00 Items paid for with Non - $0.00 General Fund Other: Subtotal $0.00 TOTAL FUNDS Grant Funds: Subtotal $0.00 $30,000.00 = TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $30,000.00 8 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) 176 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063337 SAP No. 166-589-002 EXHIBIT B GRANT APPLICATION Attach the grant application for the project 9 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) 177 From: To: Subject: Date: noreplyCaiformstack.com MN DOT SALTIRHELP; Briese, Marc (DOT); Bottos, Elisa (DOT) IIJA Grants Technical Assistance Application Friday, April 24, 2026 1:13:53 PM This message may be from an external email source. Do not select links or open attachments unless verified. Report all suspicious emails to Minnesota IT Services Security Operations Center. Intellistack Logo Formstack Submission For: IIJA Grants Technical Assistance Application Submitted at 04/24/26 1:13 PM Name of Agency: City of Shakopee Address of Agency: 485 Gorman Street Shakopee 55379 Name: Alex Jordan Address: 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Phone: (952) 233-9361 Email: ajordan@shakopeemn.gov Project Description. Include a brief description of the project for which federal funds are City of Shakopee Downtown Rail Safety Improvements. The project will include upgrading the existing rail crossing measures, which may include basic crossing upgrades such as gates, flashing lights and constant warning time train detection, non -traversable medians and/or four -quadrant gates that block both the approach and departure side of the roadway. 178 being sought.: The crossing measures would be added along the UPRR rail corridor along 2nd Avenue in downtown Shakopee between Fuller St and Shenandoah Dr. Federal Discretionary Grant Program Being Pursued.: Consolidated Rail and Infrastructure and Safety Improvement Program (CRISI) Name of Federal Awarding Agency: Federal Rail Administration State Funds Requested for IIJA Grants Technical Assistance. $30,000 is the max, and not more than one grant 30000 per local agency per year. Tribes are eligible for more than one grant per year.: Consultant, if known. If consultant has been selected, include name here. If not, write "consultant not selected yet." Note that grant agreement cannot be executed until a consultant is selected and the anticipated necessary grant amount is known.: SRF Consulting Group (not under contract) Anticipated start date of consultant contract. Note that any consultant costs incurred before a state funded grant agreement is executed are not 5/19/2026 179 eligible for re- imbursement.: Anticipated closing date of federal grant opportunity. Include actual due date of federal grant application, if known. If not known, including estimated date and "(estimated).": 6/22/2026 Mitigate the impacts of climate change in reducing emissions or improving infrastructure resiliency.: The proposed crossing improvements will replace existing flashing lights with new crossing devices. These systems will be designed to allow trains to safety navigate the tracks through downtown Shakopee without relying on train horns to stop vehicles from crossing the tracks. Improving safety and reducing collision risk makes the rail infrastructure more resilient as it wouldn't need to be replaced if hit. Train emissions will be reduced as trains won't need to slow down for street crossings. Provide benefit to areas of persistent poverty or historically disadvantaged communities.: This corridor includes 10 existing public street rail crossings. Currently, the majority of the crossings consist only of flashing warning lights, painted stop bars and train horn as trains approach the crossing (three crossings include gates). Over half of the impacted rail corridor and crossings are located within an Environmental Justice Area that includes 35% of people under the 200% poverty income. The crossing improvements will directly improve safety for those populations. Improve safety for all users.: The proposed rail crossing improvements (along with their risk reductions) will include: - Basic crossing upgrades (between 15-20%) - Non-traversable medians (between 75-80%) - Four-Quadrant Gates (between 77-82%) - Potential Street Closures (100%) Replacing the train horn reliance with physical barriers that reduce collision risk will improve safety for all drivers and pedestrians that cross 180 the tracks along 2nd Avenue to visit the historic downtown Shakopee, including redevelopment areas. Intellistack formerly Formstack 2026 Intellistack (formerly Formstack). All rights reserved. This is a customer service email. Intellistack, 50 South Steele Street, Suite 500, Denver, CO 80209 181 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063337 SAP No. 166-589-002 EXHIBIT C GRANTEE RESOLUTION APPROVING GRANT AGREEMENT 10 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) 182 MnDOT Agreement No. 1063337 SAP No. 166-589-002 RESOLUTION R2026-082 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION RAILROAD CROSSING ELIMINATION PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION AND APPROVING A STATE FUNDED PROGRAM FOR IIJA DISCRETIONARY GRANT ASSISTANCE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SAP NO. 166-589-002 WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee supports the submission of an application to the Federal Railroad Administration Railroad Crossing Elimination (RCE) Program for grant funding; and WHEREAS, the grant application seeks funding for railroad crossing safety improvements at the intersections of Minnesota Street and Market Street with 2nd Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee recognizes that a 20 percent local match is required and will be funded through the City's Capital Improvement Fund; and WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation has given notice that funding is available to provide technical assistance in preparing the grant application; and WHEREAS, the amount of the technical assistance grant has been determined to be $ 30,000.00; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: 1. That, if the City of Shakopee is awarded a grant by the Federal Railroad Administration the City of Shakopee agrees to accept the grant award and may enter into an agreement for the above -referenced project. The City of Shakopee will comply with all applicable laws, requirements, and regulations as stated in the grant agreement. 2. That the City of Shakopee does hereby agree to the terms and conditions of the technical assistance grant consistent with Minnesota Laws 2023, Chapter 68, Article 1, Section 2, Subdivision 5(a); will pay any additional amount by which the cost exceeds the estimate; and will return any amount appropriated for the project but not required. The appropriate City officers are authorized to execute the grant agreement and any amendments thereto with the Commissioner of Transportation concerning the technical assistance grant. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 19th day of May 2026. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Prepared by: City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 11 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) 183 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.s May 19, 2026 Scott County Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan (2026) Jamie Pearson, Police Chief Action to be considered: Approve resolution R2026-083, the renewal of the Scott County Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: City staff has participated in updating and planning related to hazard mitigation. The mitigation planning process was established under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000.Council has adopted this plan in the past and each city in Scott County is being asked to adopt a resolution renewing the plan. Adoption of the Hazard Mitigation Plan is something that needs to be done by the city order for Shakopee to qualify for FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance over the next five years. The current plan has been approved by the US Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. Recommendation: Adopt resolution R2026-083, renewal of Scott County Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan. Budget Impact: There is no impact to the budget. Attachments: 2026 Scott County MHMP.pdf Scott County HMP APA.pdf Resolution No R2026-083 Hazard Mitigation Plan.docx 184 Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan Scott County, Minnesota, 2026 Scott County Cities and Townships Scott 0 5 10 'Miles 1IYagc 185 Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan Scott County, Minnesota 2026 Contact: Abby Jewison, Deputy Emergency Management Director Scott County Law Enforcement Center 301 Fuller Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 651-529-2602 aj ewison@co.scott.mn.us www.co.scott.mn.us Prepared By: Abby Jewison, Deputy Emergency Management Director Scott County Law Enforcement Center 301 Fuller Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 651-529-2602 aj ewison@co.scott.mn.us www.co.scott.mn.us 2 i 186 Table of Contents Table of Contents 3 Section 1- Introduction 5 1.1 Introduction 5 1.1.1 Scope 5 1.1.2 Hazard Mitigation Definition 6 1.1.3 Benefits of Mitigation Planning 7 1.2 State Mitigation Plan Overview 7 Section 2 - Public Planning Process 8 2.1 Steering Committee Information 8 2.2 Review of Existing Plans 9 2.3 Planning Process Timeline and Steps 11 Section 3 - Scott County Profile 13 3.1 General County Description 13 3.2 Geological Characteristics 13 3.3 Hydrography 14 3.3.1 Groundwater 15 3.3.2 Lakes 15 3.3.3 Rivers 15 3.3.4 Wetlands 15 3.4 Climate 16 3.4.1 Climate Change 16 3.5 Demographics 18 3.6 Economy 20 3.7 Community Services & Infrastructure 21 3.7.1 Health Care Providers 22 3.7.2 Public Safety Providers/Government Services 23 3.7.3 Utilities/Communications 23 3.7.4 Transportation 24 3.8 Land Use and Ownership 24 Section 4 - Risk Assessment 25 4.1 Hazard Identification/Profile 26 4.1.1 Hazard Identification 26 4.1.2 Vulnerability Assessment by Jurisdiction 26 4.1.3 Calculated Priority Risk Index 27 4.1.4 Hazard Profiling Concept of Planning 31 4.1.5 GIS and Hazus-MH 31 3IPage 187 4.1.6 National Centers for Environmental Information(NCEI) Records 31 4.1.7 FEMA Declared Disasters 32 4.2 Vulnerability Assessment 35 4.2.1 Asset Inventory 35 4.2.2 Facility Replacement Costs 40 4.3 Future Development 40 4.4 Hazard Profiles 41 4.4.1 Summer Storms (Tornadoes, Windstorms, Lightning, Hail) 41 4.4.2 Flash Flood and Riverine Flood 48 4.4.4 Extreme Cold 61 4.4.5 Extreme Heat 63 4.4.6 Drought 65 4.4.7 Wildfire 68 4.4.8 Landslides and Soil Erosion 72 4.4.9 Structure Fires 76 4.4.13 Terrorism 77 4.4. 4 Dam Failure 77 Section 5 - Mitigation Strategy 82 5.1 Community Capability Assessment 82 5.1.1 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) 82 5.1.2 Plans and Ordinances 84 5.2 Mitigation Goals 84 5.3 Mitigation Actions and Projects 88 5.3.1 Hazard Mitigation Actions 90 5.3.2 Mitigation Actions by Community 91 Section 6 - Plan Maintenance 176 6.1 Monitoring, Evaluation, and Updating the Plan 176 6.2 Implementation 177 6.3 Continued Public Involvement 178 APPENDICES 179 4 i 188 Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction Hazard mitigation is a critical component of effective emergency management, defined as sustained actions taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risks to human life and property. For the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), hazard mitigation is a top strategic priority. Through comprehensive planning and implementation of mitigation measures, local governments play a key role in supporting this national objective. Proactive mitigation planning remains the most cost-effective method to reduce disaster -related losses. While it is not possible to prevent all disasters, state and local governments have a responsibility to prepare as thoroughly as possible. A strong mitigation strategy not only protects residents but also strengthens the resilience of public infrastructure and services. Under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), counties and municipalities must adopt a FEMA-approved Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan (MHMP) to maintain eligibility for federal mitigation funding and certain disaster recovery assistance programs. This plan serves as a foundational tool for integrating hazard mitigation into broader community planning and policy - making efforts. Investing in mitigation is also fiscally sound. According to the Mult-Hazard Mitigation Council, every $1 spent on FEMA-funded mitigation efforts results in an average of $13 in savings by avoiding future damages and losses (2024). These savings are realized across public budgets, infrastructure systems, and community services. Scott County is exposed to a variety of natural and human -caused hazards, including tornadoes, flooding, wildfires, winter storms, straight-line winds, and hazardous material incidents. Each of these hazards poses significant risks to life, property, and public operations. This Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan reflects a coordinated effort among local agencies, departments, and stakeholders in Scott County. It outlines targeted strategies to reduce risk, enhance public safety, and safeguard community assets. As stewards of public resources and safety, government officials are key partners in ensuring this plan is implemented effectively and remains current in the face of evolving risks. 1.1.1 Scope The Scott County Deputy Emergency Management Director and the members of the Scott County Mitigation Planning Team have combined efforts to update the 2021 Scott County Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan. This Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan evaluates and ranks the major natural and man-made hazards affecting Scott County as determined by frequency of event, economic impact, deaths, and injuries. Mitigation recommendations are based on input from state and local agencies, public input, and national best practices. 5 189 Scott County GIS performed the hazard risk assessment for 100 -year floods using the Hazus-MH GIS tool. In recognition of the importance of planning in mitigation activities, FEMA created Hazards USA Multi -Hazard (Hazus-MH), a powerful geographic information system (GIS)-based disaster risk assessment tool. This tool enables communities of all sizes to predict estimated losses from floods, hurricanes, earthquakes, and other related phenomena and to measure the impact of various mitigation practices that might help reduce those losses. The Minnesota Homeland Security and Emergency Management (HSEM) office has determined that Hazus-MH should play a critical role in Minnesota's risk assessments, and therefore the 100 -year flood hazard analysis is introduced in this plan. This is a multi -jurisdictional plan that covers Scott County, including the cities of Belle Plaine, Credit River, Elko New Market, Jordan, New Prague, Prior Lake, Savage, and Shakopee as well as the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community, a sovereign, tribal nation. The Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community (SMSC) has elected for many years to join Scott County in having a single MHMP, as the tribal nation resides within the borders of Scott County and the majority of information is the same. For the purposes of this document, SMSC defines 'the public' as all community members of the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community. The Scott County risk and mitigation activities identified in this plan also incorporate the concerns and needs of townships, school districts, and other entities participating in this plan. Members from each jurisdiction were invited to participate in the planning process by attending workgroup meetings, providing information, suggesting mitigation strategies and reviewing the plan document. Each jurisdiction will adopt the plan by resolution after approval by FEMA. Copies of the resolutions can be found in Appendix D in the back of the plan. Scott County has specified the following goals for this Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan: • To evaluate and rank the hazards that impact Scott County. • To determine the extent of existing mitigation programs and policy capabilities within Scott County. • To create a detailed, working document that will establish a standardized process for ensuring coordination of hazard mitigation efforts and to implement an ongoing and comprehensive hazard mitigation strategy. • To familiarize state and local officials and the general public about comprehensive hazard mitigation in Scott County and obtain their support. 1.1.2 Hazard Mitigation Definition Hazard mitigation may be defined as any action taken to eliminate or reduce the long-term risk to human life and property from natural and technological hazards. Potential types of hazard mitigation measures include the following: • Structural hazard control or protection projects • Retrofitting facilities • Acquisition and relocation of structures 6 190 • Development of mitigation standards, regulations, policies, and programs • Public awareness and education programs • Development or improvement of warning systems 1.1.3 Benefits of Mitigation Planning The benefits of hazard mitigation planning include the following: • Saving lives, protecting the health of the public, and reducing injuries • Preventing or reducing property damage • Reducing economic losses • Minimizing social dislocation and stress • Reducing agricultural losses • Maintaining critical facilities in functioning order • Protecting infrastructure from damage • Protecting mental health • Reducing legal liability of government and public officials 1.2 State Mitigation Plan Overview FEMA currently has three mitigation grant programs that are administered by the State of Minnesota: the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), the Pre -Disaster Mitigation program (PDM), and the Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) program. The HMGP, PDM and FMA are administered through the Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. 7 191 Section 2 - Public Planning Process 2.1 Steering Committee Information The Scott County multi -hazard mitigation steering committee is headed by the Scott County Deputy Emergency Management Director, who is the primary point of contact. Members from the public, private, and governmental sectors were invited to be a part of the Scott County MHMP steering committee, those who chose to be involved are listed below. Table 1 identifies the steering committee individuals and the organizations they represent. Organization Name Participant Title Scott County Emergency Management Robert Lane Deputy Emergency Management Director Scott County Emergency Management Scott Haas Emergency Management & Communications Director Scott County Emergency Management Abigail Jewison Deputy Emergency Management Director New Prague Police Department Tim Applen Chief of Police Scott Watershed Management Organization Vanessa Strong Water Resource Supervisor Scott County Planning 8z Resource Management Brad Davis Planning & Resource Management Director Scott County Building Inspections Dan Bisek Building Inspector Scott County Environmental Health Kate Sedlacek Environmental Services Manager Scott County Public Health Katelyn Maddox Community Health Specialist Scott County Employee Relations Kevin Nelson ER Safety Coordinator Table 1. Multi -Hazard Mitigation Steering Committee Additional representatives from the cities of Shakopee, Savage, Prior Lake, Belle Plaine Credit River, Jordan, Elko New Market, and The Prior Lake Soil and Water District are as follows: Organization Name Participant Title Belle Plaine Terry Stier Police Chief/Emergency Management Dir. Credit River Steve Jelinski City Administrator 8IYagc 192 Elko New Market Craig Bell Police Chief/Emergency Management Dir. Jordan Brett Empey Police Chief/Emergency Management Dir. Prior Lake Liam Duggan Police Chief/Emergency Management Dir. Prior Lake Soil and Water District Joni Giese District Administrator Savage Jeremie Bresnahan Fire Chief/Emergency Management Dir. Shakopee Jeff Tate Police Chief/Emergency Management Dir. Though these cities were not on the Steering Committee, each individual noted above was provided multiple opportunities to provide input regarding their jurisdictions throughout the planning process, including providing updates to their existing mitigation actions, suggesting new mitigation actions within their jurisdictions, and ranking the threats and hazards in their jurisdictions by completing a Calculated Risk Priority Index (CPRI) for their area. Representatives from these jurisdictions were provided with updates on Steering Committee meetings and had an opportunity to review the draft of the plan and provide feedback once it was completed. Jurisdictional representatives participating in the steering committee were contacted throughout the plan update process to provide feedback on the hazards of concern to their community and the mitigation actions which they would seek to implement upon plan adoption. The list of final mitigation actions was divided into jurisdiction -specific mitigation action charts so that each could see and address those actions that applied specifically to their cities (see Appendix G: Mitigation Actions by Jurisdiction). 2.2 Review of Existing Plans Scott County and its local communities utilized a variety of planning documents to direct community development. These documents include comprehensive plans, water plans, and emergency operations plans. The planning process also incorporated the existing natural hazard mitigation elements from previous planning efforts. Table 2 lists the plans, studies, reports, and ordinances used in the development of the plan. Author(s) Year Title Description Where Used Scott County Community Development Division 2019 Scott County 2040 Comprehensive Plan This plan covers strategic challenges, land use & growth management, transportation, parks & trails, and water & natural resources. Section 3 9IPag 193 Minnesota Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 2024 Minnesota All - Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Statewide hazard mitigation plan. Section 4 Scott County 2024 Scott County Emergency Operations Plan A guide for emergency operations, it is intended to assist key county/city officials and emergency organizations to carry out their responsibilities for the protection of life and property under a wide range of emergency conditions. Section 4 FEMA 2013 Resilience Report for Scott County The Resilience Report provides information to help local officials, floodplain managers, planners, emergency managers, and others better understand their risk, take steps to mitigate those risks, and communicate those risks to their citizens and local businesses. This Resilience Report provides the community a reference for management and mitigation of floods and other risks. Section 4 Table 2. Planning Documents used for MHMP Planning Process 10IFagL 194 2.3 Planning Process Timeline and Steps In order to update the 2021 Scott County Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan, the Scott County Deputy Emergency Management Director worked in coordination with the State of Minnesota Hazard Mitigation officials, and members of the steering committee. The goals of the updating process were to include more recent data documenting the critical infrastructure and hazards faced by Scott County, reformat and reorganize the plan to reflect definitions of hazards as expressed in the 2008 State of Minnesota Multi -Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Plan, and reflect current hazard mitigation priorities in Scott County. Therefore, the new plan includes not only new data documenting the types of hazards faced by Scott County residents and Emergency Planning officials, but also new thinking about how to best address these hazards. This plan is a multi -jurisdictional plan that covers Scott County and the cities of Belle Plaine, Credit River, Elko New Market, Jordan, Prior Lake, Savage, and Shakopee as well as the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community, a sovereign, tribal nation. The Scott County risks and mitigation activities identified in this plan incorporate the concerns and needs of townships, school districts, and other entities participating in this plan. An in -person meeting occurred which included the Scott County MHMP steering committee to begin the update process for the 2026 Scott County All Hazard Mitigation Plan. The meeting was held on July 31, 2024 at the Scott County Regional Training Facility in Jordan and served as an introductory kick-off to the plan update. A duplicate meeting was held on August 14, 2024 for steering committee members who were unable to attend the first meeting. The steering committee was provided with an overview of the purpose, process and timeline for the Scott County Multi - Hazard Mitigation Plan update, as well as the role and responsibilities of steering committee members. Appendix E provides documentation of steering committee meeting summaries, including participant sign -in sheets and presentation slides. After the initial meeting, steering committee members were also engaged in providing feedback on mitigation actions as they relate to hazards facing the county. This information was used to inform the development of mitigation strategies in the updated plan. New hazard mitigation actions were discussed for inclusion in the plan using the STAPLE+E process (see Section 5.3 Mitigation Actions and Projects). For more information on the planning process, see sections 5 and 6. Public input was sought through meetings and direct conversations (see Appendix F: Public Meeting Notices and Meeting Notes). Two public meeting were held at the Scott County Government Center on March 12 and April 1, 2025, described in Table 3. The meeting was facilitated by the Scott County Deputy Emergency Management Director. The meeting was publicized through a press release, social media postings, and newspaper publications. At these meetings members of the public learned about the hazard mitigation process, received an update on the pace of updating the 2021 plan, and discussed new mitigation actions that could be added to the 2026 plan. 11 Page 195 Meeting Type Date 1 Location Steering Committee 7/31/2024 Regional Training Facility, Jordan Steering Committee 8/14/2024 Scott County Law Enforcement Center, Shakopee Public 3/12/2025 Scott County Government, Shakopee Public 4/1/2025 Scott County Government, Shakopee Table 3. Scott County Hazard Mitigation Update Meetings At the close of these meetings, the Scott County Deputy Emergency Management Director worked with members of the steering committee to incorporate comments from the public hearings into the Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan. 12 I 196 Section 3 - Scott County Profile This section offers a general overview of Scott County to provide a basic understanding of the characteristics of the community, such as the physical environment, population, and the location and distribution of services. 3.1 General County Description Scott County is located in southeastern Minnesota, just south of the Minneapolis -Saint Paul metropolitan area. It shares its western borders with Carver and Sibley Counties, and to the south, it borders Le Sueur and Rice Counties. Hennepin County lies to the north, while Dakota County is situated to the east. Covering approximately 368 square miles (235,520 acres), Scott County had an estimated population of 154,954 as of 2023 (Minnesota State Demographic Center, 2023). Shakopee serves as both the county seat and the largest city in Scott County. The Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community is also located within the county and currently owns more than 3,760 acres of land. These holdings are situated within or near the original 250 -acre reservation that was established for the Tribe in the 1880s. The eight cities in Scott County are Belle Plaine, Credit River, Elko New Market, Jordan, New Prague, Prior Lake, Savage, and Shakopee. The ten townships include Belle Plaine, Blakeley, Cedar Lake, Helena, Jackson, Louisville, New Market, Saint Lawrence, Sand Creek, and Spring Lake. According to 2022 data, the largest employment sectors in Scott County are Manufacturing (11%), Construction (11%), and Retail Trade (10%), which together comprise the top three employment sectors. Health Care/Social Assistance also accounts for 10% of the workforce (Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development, 2022). The county has experienced consistent economic growth, with job growth outpacing the statewide average since 2015. Between 2015 and 2022, Scott County saw a 13.2% increase in total employment compared to a 9.8% increase across Minnesota. Demographically, Scott County has become increasingly diverse. In 2010, non-white residents comprised approximately 14% of the population. By 2023, that figure had risen to nearly 22% (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2023 Estimates). The largest minority populations include Hispanic or Latino, Asian, and Black or African American residents. As of 2023, the percentage of Scott County residents living below the poverty level was approximately 3.3%, compared to an average of 6.7% for the seven -county Twin Cities metro area (Metropolitan Council, 2023). 3.2 Geological Characteristics Scott County's surface geology is predominantly composed of glacial till, except along the Minnesota River corridor, where alluvium and terrace deposits are more prevalent. In certain locations adjacent to the river, bedrock lies at or near the surface. The widespread presence of glacial till — which has low permeability due to its high content of silt and clay —serves as a protective layer over the sedimentary rock aquifers beneath. However, this natural protection is reduced near the 13 Page 197 river, where shallow bedrock increases the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination. This is particularly significant because all drinking water in Scott County is sourced from groundwater. Over centuries, the Minnesota River and its tributaries have sculpted distinctive bluff formations throughout parts of the county, most notably in Blakeley Township. These bluffs offer scenic views and are home to the majority of the natural communities and rare species identified in the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) inventories. As development expands into these areas, bluff landscapes present challenges for stormwater management and erosion control. Proper management is essential to preserve their ecological and aesthetic value. Integrating bluff preservation into land -use planning not only protects these natural features but also enhances visual appeal and reinforces the county's unique historical and environmental character. In the northern part of Scott County, near the Minnesota River terrace, Prairie du Chien dolostone is located close to the present land surface. In many of these areas, the bedrock is overlain by 20 to 30 feet of sand and gravel. While these overlying materials must be removed to access the bedrock, doing so could increase the availability of bedrock resources. However, much of this region has already been urbanized, limiting future extraction. Scott County's bedrock aggregate resources can be divided into three sub -regions: 1. Scott Northwest: In this area, Prairie du Chien dolostone underlies the Minnesota River terrace and is relatively thin (50 to 85 feet thick), underlain by Jordan Sandstone at shallow depths. This sub -region has supported several large quarry operations, and much of the dolostone resource has already been mined. 2. Scott North-Central: South of the Minnesota River, this sub -region features Prairie du Chien dolostone ranging from 70 to 90 feet in thickness. While much of the area has not been quarried due to urban development —particularly in and around Shakopee —some active or former quarries exist in less developed peripheral areas. 3. Scott Northeast: Here, the Prairie du Chien formation also underlies a river terrace. Remaining resources are mostly found at the margins of two quarries that have had their overburden —initially more than 10 feet thick —removed. Urban encroachment poses increasing pressure on these remaining extraction sites. 3.3 Hydrography Scott County's lakes, streams, and groundwater resources are among its most vital natural assets. Increasingly, water quality has emerged as a critical environmental concern, both locally and statewide. Water supports a wide range of essential functions, including domestic and residential use, industrial operations, agriculture, and recreation. The overall health, safety, and well-being of residents are closely tied to the quality and availability of the county's water resources. It is therefore imperative to take proactive measures to prevent or reduce adverse impacts on these systems. The majority of Scott County lies within the Minnesota River -Shakopee watershed, part of the broader Minnesota River Basin. Additionally, a small portion of the county's southeastern corner falls within the Mississippi River/Lake Pepin and Cannon River watersheds, both of which are components of the Lower Mississippi River Basin. These interconnected watershed systems 14 IPage 198 underscore the regional significance of protecting and managing water resources at both the local and basin -wide scales. Basic hydrography in Scott County is mapped in Figure A-1 in Appendix A. 3.3.1 Groundwater All Scott County drinking water comes from groundwater. The abundance of glacial till provides a layer of protection for the county's aquifers that lie in the sedimentary rock below, except by the river where bedrock is near the surface. Groundwater is susceptible to contamination in these areas. 3.3.2 Lakes According to the Minnesota DNR, there are 64 lakes in the county greater than 2 acres in size, the largest of which is 957 acres (Lower Prior Lake). These lakes cover 6500 of the county's 235,520 acres (2.75%). Impaired waters are an increasing problem as Scott County has many lakes, creeks and rivers that are on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Impaired Waters lists, including the Prior Lake, Cedar Lake, Spring Lake, Lake O'Dowd and Fish Lake as well as the Credit River, Minnesota River, Picha Creek, Raven Stream, Robert Creek, Sand Creek, Brewery Creek, and Phillips Creek. (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 2024). Impaired waters have become a priority issue because they do not meet state water quality standards, they affect growth and health of communities and economies, and the Clean Water Act has a mandate requiring every state to address impairments. 3.3.3 Rivers The Minnesota River forms the northern and western boundary of Scott County. A tributary of the Mississippi River, the Minnesota River is 332 miles long, draining a watershed of approximately 17,000 square miles. The Credit River, a 22 -mile long tributary of the Minnesota River, flows through the eastern end of the County, close to the town of Savage. It originates at a lake in Elko New Market. The 60 -mile Vermillion River begins in eastern Scott County just north of Elko New Market. It flows into the Mississippi River south of Hastings, Minnesota. Sand Creek flows through central Scott County and the city of Jordan, where it has resulted in severe flooding in the past. Invalid source specified. Minnesota's impaired waters list I Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 3.3.4 Wetlands Wetlands mapped by the National Wetlands Inventory cover 36,393 acres (56 square miles) in Scott County. Important benefits of wetlands include: storage area for excess water during flooding; filtering of sediments and nutrients before they enter lakes, rivers and streams; and fish and wildlife habitat. Wetlands in Scott County include 7 types, including seasonally flooded basins and flats, wet meadows, shallow marshes, deep marshes, shrub swamps, wooded swamps, and bogs (Figure A - 1). 151 199 Invasive plants have invaded many wetlands in Minnesota. These plants can take over entire native communities and threaten native wetland ecosystems. Some of the area's most common invasive species include common buckthorn, purple loosestrife, garlic mustard, and Eurasian watermilfoil. Zebra mussels have also been documented in Upper Prior and Lower Prior Lakes (MN DNR, 2018). 3.4 Climate The Koppen Climate Classification of Scott County is Humid Continental, Hot Summer (Dfa), characterized by four distinct seasons and large seasonal temperature differences Invalid source specified.. Although the climate is essentially uniform throughout the county, variations in microclimate may occur as a result of differences in vegetation, soil and relief. The average annual precipitation in the Shakopee area is 31.6" and the average annual snowfall is 51.2." The average temperature in July is 73° F and the average in January is 13° F (NWS,2025). 3.4.1 Climate Change Minnesota's climate is currently changing in ways that affect the environment, economy and everyday life. Historical weather data show changing trends in some weather phenomenon over the past few decades, and future changes are likely. Definite predictions are difficult to make, as changes may vary depending on geographical location, even within Minnesota. Intense study of these topics is ongoing. According to the 2018 Planning for Climate & Health Impacts in Minnesota, There has been an increase in winter and summer temperatures. Our average winter lows are rising rapidly, and our coldest days of winter are now warmer then we have ever recorded. In fact, Minnesota winters are warming nearly 13 times faster than our summers. The continued rise in winter temperatures will result in less snow pack, which will increase chances for grassland/wildfires as well as drought. There has been an increase in total average as well as heavy precipitation events, with longer periods of intervening dry spells. Our historical rainfall patterns have changed substantially, giving rise to larger, more frequent heavy downpours. Minnesota's high -density rain gauge network has captured a nearly four fold increase in "mega -rain" events just since the year 2000, compared to the previous three decades. Extreme rainfall events increase the probability of disaster -level flooding and new research suggests a recent increase in precipitation -triggered landslide activity in the metro region. (Minnesota Department of Health, 2018). Winter temperatures in Minnesota have been warming nearly twice as fast as annual average temperatures, a trend that has been noticed throughout the Midwest. There has also been a distinct spread of warmer lows into the northern portion of the state, and 7 of the top 10 warmest years in Minnesota since record -keeping began in 1895 have occurred within the last 15 years (Minnesota Department of Health, 2015). Various studies have also concluded that the frequency and intensity of precipitation in the Midwest has increased, with more storm events leading to flooding. 16 Page 200 Rural communities are particularly vulnerable to climate change, due to their dependence upon natural resources, physical isolation, limited economic diversity, higher poverty rates and aging populations. According to Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Fourth National Climate Assessment, Residents in rural communities often have limited capacity to respond to climate change impacts, due to poverty and limitations in community resources. Communication, transportation, water, and sanitary infrastructure are vulnerable to disruption from climate stressors. Climate change has already had direct impacts on rural populations and economics and will inevitably have repercussions for rural livelihoods and prosperity in the future. (Hales, et al., 2018). The Assessment also notes that transportation systems in rural areas are more vulnerable to risks such as flooding, since there are typically fewer transportation options and infrastructure redundancies. In addition, power and communication outages due to severe weather events typically take longer to repair in rural areas, which can increase the vulnerability of elderly populations. Rural areas are also more vulnerable since they typically have more limited financial resources to deal with the effects of climate change. The composition of the region's forests are expected to change as increasing temperatures shift tree habitats northward. While forests in the Midwest are currently acting as a net absorber of carbon, this could change in the future due to projected increases in insect outbreaks, forest fires, and drought, which will result in greater tree mortality and carbon emissions (Pryor, et al., 2014). The National Climate Assessment suggests that infrastructure planning (particularly water resources infrastructure) should "be improved by incorporating climate change as a factor in new design standards and asset management and rehabilitation of critical and aging facilities, emphasizing flexibility, redundancy, and resiliency" (Georgakakos, et al., 2014). Federal, state, and tribal governments are increasingly integrating climate change adaptation into existing decision -making, planning, or infrastructure -improvement processes (Georgakakos, et al., 2014). 171 201 3.5 Demographics Shakopee is the largest city in Scott County (pop. 45961) and the designated county seat. There are 8 cities and 10 townships within the county. Table 4 summarizes population by community according to the 2019 Metropolitan Council estimates. Figure 1 shows Scott County population density by census block. Community 2022 Population % of County Belle Plaine 7,415 4.80% Credit River 5,498 3.56% Elko New Market 5,003 3.24% Jordan 6,836 4.42% New Prague 4,706 3.04% Prior Lake 27,855 18.04% Savage 33,137 21.46% Shakopee 45,961 31.71% Belle Plaine Township 859 .55% Blakeley Township 408 .26% Cedar Lake Township 3,078 1.99% Helena Township 1,817 1.17% Jackson Township 1,513 0.97% Louisville Township 1,318 0.85% New Market Township 3,551 2.29% St. Lawrence Township 484 .31% Sand Creek Township 1,477 0.95% Spring Lake Township 3,468 2.24% Total: 154,395 100% Source: (Council, 2022) Table 4. Scott County Population by Community, 2022 18I:_ ag_ 202 Figure 1. Scott County Population by Census Block, 2020 2020 Total Population by Census Block 0-65 ® bb- 213 218-619 G20.1592 Population growth trends have an important influence on the needs and demands of a variety of services such as transportation, law enforcement, and emergency response. An understanding of population trends and location of population concentrations is important for making projections regarding potential impacts in the event of a disaster. In 2017, Scott County had an estimated population of 144,717 residents, averaging 392 persons per square mile of land area. Shakopee, the largest city in the county and the county seat, has a population of 41,519. Scott County's population is rapidly increasing, rising 55% between 1990 and 2000, 45% from 2000 to 2010 and 16% from 2010 to 2020. Since 1950, the population has risen by 816%. Between 2000 and 2010 Scott County was the fastest growing county in Minnesota, and one of the fastest growing in the nation. Table 5 below shows the population change in Scott County between 1950 and 2017. 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Change 1950-2020 Change 2010-2020 16,486 21,909 32,423 43,784 57,846 89,498 129,928 150,928 +816% +16.2% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013 Table 5. Scott County Population Change (1940-2020) 191 203 Scott County's population is projected to grow by 38% between 2020 and 2040. Table 6 below shows population projections for Scott County until 2050. T 2020 2030 2040 Projected Change 2020-2040 153,750 185,520 211,750 +38% Source: (Minnesota Demographic Center, 2022) Table 6. Scott County Population Projections (2020-2040) 2010-2020 Population Compound Growth Rate IiWkNPy iwp St .42 LiwrSF1c Twp BMW pralne Twp sam Cf@Pk Tap SPAOpPP PT, r Lake SMing Lakti Teen Cedar Lake Twp Figure 2: 2010-2020 Population Annual Compound Growth Rate Crr: Aivar NW& Mal km Trip Elko New Market 3.6 Economy Scott County is led by the Accommodation and Food Services industry, with 14% of jobs in the county. Manufacturing, Retail Trade, and Construction are also major components of the county's economy. Major employers include Amazon, Seagate Technologies, Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community, and Fabcon. The county has a strong commercial and industrial base as well as a concentration of entertainment attractions, such as Canterbury Park Race Track, The Landing at 201 204 Minnesota River Heritage Park, Elko Speedway, Mystic Lake Casino, Minnesota's Largest Candy Store, the Renaissance Festival, Valley Fair Amusement Park and Mystic Lake Amphitheater, a new 19,000 seat capacity outdoor venue (Minneapolis St. Paul Regional Economic Development Partnership, 2015). The number of jobs in the county rose by over 8.2% between 2012 and 2015. Table 7 provides an overview of the annual average employment by major industry sector in Scott County. Industry Number of Jobs (2015) Number of Jobs (2019) Number of Jobs (2025) Natural Resources and Mining 172 188 195 Construction 3,641 6107 5798 Manufacturing 5,789 6691 7417 Trade, Transportation, Utilities 8,585 13399 19257 Information 367 391 280 Financial Activities 969 695 670 Professional /Business Services 4,103 5745 4446 Education and Health Services 8,149 8682 10749 Leisure and Hospitality 9,102 3552 9495 Public Administration 2,454 2770 2832 Other Services 1,813 2015 1955 Total Number of Jobs: 45,144 56,235 63,103 Source: Minnesota Dept. of Employment and Economic Development. Note: data discrepancies between segment values and totals exist due to data suppression for confidentiality. Table 7. Annual Average Employment by Major Industry Sector, Scott County The 2023 median household income was $120,247, compared to a Minnesota average of $65,699. The median household income in Scott County increased 29.1% from 2013 to 2023. The percent of the county's population living below the poverty level in 2017 was 4.0%, compared to 9.5% for the state of Minnesota. The Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development reported that 88.2% of the workforce in Scott County was employed in the private sector in 2024 (DEED, 2024). 3.7 Community Services & Infrastructure The following section provides an overview on community services and infrastructure within Scott County. Examples of community services include healthcare and public safety, while examples of community infrastructure include power utilities, water and sewer facilities, and the transportation network. Below shows critical facilities in the county, and tables of all critical facilities can be found in Appendix B. 211 205 Q Ilospital Government Fncilin• • MP(.A I lazartk,us Materials School S Rank Post Office MN DNR, MP(:.A, MN Gcospatial Information Office, Scott County Figure 3. Critical Facilities in Scott County 3.7.1 Health Care Providers There are 2 hospitals in Scott County, the Mayo Clinic Health System in New Prague and the St. Francis Regional Medical Center in Shakopee. The Mayo Clinic Health System includes a 25 -bed critical care access hospital with a level III trauma center, a primary care clinic, and an express care clinic. It also operates a clinic in Belle Plaine. The St. Francis Regional Medical Center maintains clinics in Shakopee, Savage, Jordan and Prior Lake, in addition to a hospital in Shakopee with 86 private rooms. Prior Lake also has the Shakopee Dakota Mystic Clinic and Urgent Care facility. Fairview operates clinics in Prior Lake and Savage. Scott County has ambulance services through the following EMS providers: 1. Allina: Serves Shakopee, Savage, Prior Lake, 2. MHEALTH: Serves Elko New Market 3. North Memorial: Serves New Prague 4. Ridgeview: Serves Belle Plaine and Jordan 5. Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community: Serves the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community. 22 206 3.7.2 Public Safety Providers/Government Services The Sheriff's Office is located at the Law Enforcement Center in Shakopee. The following cities have their own police departments: Belle Plaine, Elko New Market, Jordan, New Prague, Prior Lake, Savage and Shakopee. Figure 4 shows fire departments and fire response times in Scott County. These drive times were created using ArcGIS Network Analyst and MnDOT road data. Speed limits from the MnDOT highway speed limit database were used when available. According to this model, all areas of the county are within 10 minutes of a fire department. Response Time in Minutes - less thin 3 - 3-5 - 5-R R-10 r« Department MN DNR. MN G • ,atial Information Office. MnDOT Figure 4. Fire Departments and Fire Response Times in Scott County 3.7.3 Utilities/Communications There are 5 electricity providers within Scott County: Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative, the New Prague Utilities Commission, Shakopee Public Utilities Commission, Dakota Electric Service, and Xcel Energy. CenterPoint Energy and Minnesota Energy Resources provide natural gas services to Scott County. Established in 2004, the Allied Radio Matrix for Emergency Response (ARMER) Program, administered in coordination with the Minnesota Statewide Radio Board, manages the implementation of a 700/800 megahertz (MHz) shared digital trunked radio communication system. In Scott County, there are 8 ARMER towers. 23 207 3.7.4 Transportation The county transportation system is composed of roads, highways, public transit, railroads and trails. The system is designed to serve all residents, businesses, industries and tourists. According to Minnesota law, any structure or combination of structures over a ten -foot span length is considered a bridge. Most of the bridges in the county are multiple box culvert structures. The County is responsible for the inspection of 128 bridges in the County. 36 are on municipal roads, 27 on township roads and 65 are on County highways. All bridges within the county are inspected every 2 years, with some inspected annually. Bridge ratings are made for each component of a bridge: deck, superstructure, substructure, channel & channel protection, and culvert condition. The ratings range from 0 to 9, with 9 being in excellent condition. Bridge ratings fall into 4 categories: Adequate, Functionally Obsolete, Structurally Deficient, and Closed. Railroads in Scott County serve regional agriculture and industrial uses. The Union Pacific Railroad currently operates in Scott County. The Minnesota Valley Transit Authority includes service to Prior Lake, Savage and Shakopee and provides services within Scott County and throughout the Twin Cities. Scott County has vanpool services and Transit Link dial -a -ride bus services available through the Metropolitan Council. 3.8 Land Use and Ownership Scott County covers a total of 368 square miles (235,520 acres). Land in Scott County is primarily used for agricultural production. Most of the larger farm holdings are located in the county's southwestern corner. There are also expansive agricultural areas in Helena, Sand Creek, and St. Lawrence townships. However, Scott County has experienced the strongest development growth to the north and east where there is close proximity to major highways that access the Twin Cities region. In 2022, 624 farms existed in the county, covering 99,629 acres. Of this farming land, 70 is cropland and 30 is Livestock, Poultry and Products. The number of farms in the county decreased by 16 between 2017 and 2022, while the number of acres farmed decreased by only 14 (Census of Agriculture, 2022). Agricultural areas in the state such as those in Scott County may need to undergo transformative changes to keep pace with climate change, though the country's agricultural system is expected to be fairly resilient overall due to "the system's flexibility to engage in adaptive behaviors such as expansion of irrigated acreage, regional shifts in acreage for specific crops, crop rotations, changes to management decisions (such as choice and timing of inputs and cultivation practices), and altered trade patterns compensating for yield changes" (Hales, et al., 2018). 24 IPage 208 Section 4 - Risk Assessment The goal of mitigation is to reduce the future impacts of a hazard including loss of life, property damage, disruption to local and regional economies, and the expenditure of public and private funds for recovery. Sound mitigation practices must be based on sound risk assessment. A risk assessment involves quantifying the potential loss resulting from a disaster by assessing the vulnerability of buildings, infrastructure, and people. Basing risk assessments on the best information available is important in developing effective mitigation actions that benefit communities. Geographic Information System (GIS) tools are not only helpful in producing maps, but they also show structures at risk and may determine damage estimates for potential hazard scenarios. MN Homeland Security and Emergency Management (HSEM) mitigation staff encourages the use of GIS tools in risk assessments because they produce good information to be used in the risk assessment process. In recognition of the importance of planning in mitigation activities, FEMA created Hazards USA Multi -Hazard (Hazus-MH), a powerful GIS-based disaster risk assessment tool. This tool enables communities to predict estimated losses from floods, hurricanes and other related phenomena and to measure the impact of various mitigation practices that might help reduce those losses. This assessment identifies the characteristics and potential consequences of a disaster, how much of the community could be affected by a disaster, and the impact on community assets. A risk assessment consists of 3 components — hazard identification and prioritization, risk profile, and vulnerability profile. The last step is the risk ranking for each jurisdiction. 251 209 4.1 Hazard Identification/Profile 4.1.1 Hazard Identification The cornerstone of the risk assessment is identification of the hazards that affect jurisdictions. To facilitate the planning process, several sources were employed to ensure that the natural hazards are identified prior to assessment. The county maintenance of the plan includes continual updates of the hazards identified in the initial plan. The mitigation steering committee compared the hazards in the initial plan to current publications to determine if new hazards should be considered or if some should be deleted. Natural hazards are identified in the FEMA publication "Multi -Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment - A Cornerstone of the National Mitigation Strategy," also known as MHIRA. For the purpose of this plan, FEMA defines other hazards or "man-made hazards" as technological hazards and terrorism. These are distinct from natural hazards primarily in that they originate from human activity. In contrast, while the risks presented by natural hazards may be increased or decreased as a result of human activity, they are not inherently human -induced. The term "technological hazards" refers to the origins of incidents that can arise from human activities such as the manufacture, transportation, storage, and use of hazardous materials. For the sake of simplicity, this guide assumes that technological emergencies are accidental and that their consequences are unintended. The term "terrorism" refers to intentional, criminal, and malicious acts. There is no single, universally accepted definition of terrorism, and it can be interpreted in many ways. For the purposes of this plan, FEMA refers to "terrorism" as the use of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), including biological, chemical, nuclear, and radiological weapons; arson, incendiary, explosive, and armed attacks; industrial sabotage and intentional hazardous materials releases; and "cyber terrorism." 4.1.2 Vulnerability Assessment by Jurisdiction The steering committee met multiple times to review and update the hazards faced by residents of Scott County, update the existing mitigation actions published in the 2021 Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan, and propose new mitigation actions. To engage in this process the committee drew on a number of data sources. First, the committee examined the hazards identified in the 2021 Hazard Mitigation Plan (Table 10). These existing mitigation actions were discussed and adjusted to reflect the definitions of natural hazards used in the State of Minnesota 2024 Multi -Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment list of natural hazards. This was done in order to assure that the risks faced by Scott County were categorized the same way as the priority hazards established by the State of Minnesota. Natural Hazards Drought Landslide/Mudslide Extreme Temperatures Flooding Hail High Winds Ice/Snow Storm Land Subsidence Lightning Wildfire 261 210 Manmade Hazards Hazardous Materials Aircraft Incidents Pandemic/Epidemic Terrorism Urban Structure Fire Civil Unrest Pipeline Incidents Table 10. Hazards identified in the 2026 Scott County Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan While the MHMP mainly deals with natural hazards, this planning took place with the understanding that many non -natural hazards could occur as a result of natural disasters (i.e. disruption in electrical service due to freezing rain causing problems for both utility corporations and vulnerable populations dependent on electricity for heat). This plan draws on a variety of data sources including the State of Minnesota and Homeland Security Emergency Management Critical Infrastructure Strategy for the State of Minnesota (2010), FEMA's Local Mitigation Planning How-to Guide Integrating Manmade Hazards into Mitigation Planning (2003), FEMA's Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide (2011), and the State of Minnesota Multi Hazards Identification Risk Assessment. The committee ranked hazards based on a Calculated Priority Risk Index, or CPRI. The methodology of the CPRI is outlined below. The CPRI rankings for each hazard are listed by jurisdiction in Table 12. 4.1.3 Calculated Priority Risk Index The vulnerability assessment builds upon the previously developed hazard information by identifying the community assets and development trends and intersecting them with the hazard profiles to assess the potential amount of damage that could be caused by each hazard event. A summary of Calculated Priority Risk Index (CPRI) Categories and Risk Levels is shown in Table 11. Definitions of CPRI Categories Probability - a guide to predict how often a random event will occur. Annual probabilities are expressed between 0.001 or less (low) up to 1 (high). An annual probability of 1 predicts that a natural hazard will occur at least once per year. Magnitude/Severity - indicates the impact to a community through potential fatalities, injuries, property losses, and/or losses of services. The vulnerability assessment gives information that is helpful in making this determination for each community. Warning Time - plays a factor in the ability to prepare for a potential disaster and to warn the public. The assumption is that more warning time allows for more emergency preparations and public information. Duration - relates to the span of time local, state, and/or federal assistance will be necessary to prepare, respond, and recover from a potential disaster event. 27 Page 211 Table 11. Summary of Calculated Priority Risk Index (CPRI) Categories and Risk Levels CPRI orIndex Category y DEGREE OF RISK Assigned Weighting Factor Level ID Description Value t' •� cRare a, Unlikely Extremely rare with no documented history of occurrences or events. Annual probability of less than 0.001 1 45% Possible occurrences with at least one documented or anecdotal historic event. Annual probability that is between 0.01 and 0.001. 2 Likely Occasional occurrences with at least two or more documented historic events. Annual probability that is between 0.1 and 0.01. 3 Highly Likely Frequent events with a well -documented history of occurrence. Annual probability that is greater than 0.1. 4 1 Magnitude/Severity Negligible Negligible property damages (less than 5% of critical and non -critical facilities and infrastructure). Injuries or illnesses are treatable with first aid and there are no deaths. Negligible quality of life lost. Shutdown of critical facilities for less than 24 hours. 1 30% Limited Slight property damages (greater than 5% and less than 25% of critical and non -critical facilities and infrastructure). Injuries or illnesses do not result in permanent disability and there are no deaths. Moderate quality of life lost. Shut down of critical facilities for more than 1 day and less than 1 week. 2 Critical Moderate property damages (greater than 25% and less than 50% of critical and non -critical facilities and infrastructure). Injuries or illnesses result in permanent disability and at least one death. Shut down of critical facilities for more than 1 week and less than 1 month. 3 Catastrophic Severe property damages (greater than 50% of critical and non -critical facilities and infrastructure). Injuries or illnesses result in permanent disability and multiple deaths. Shut down of critical facilities for more than 1 month. 4 Warning Time Less than 6 hours Self-explanatory. 4 15% 6 to 12 hours Self-explanatory. 3 12 to 24 hours Self-explanatory. 2 More than 24 hours Self-explanatory. 1 Duration Less than 6 hours Self-explanatory. 1 10% Less than 24 hours Self-explanatory. 2 Less than one week Self-explanatory. 3 More than one week Self-explanatory 4 28 IPage 212 CPRI hazard rankings by jurisdiction are listed in Table 12. Natural Hazards Dam Failure Drought Extreme Cold Extreme Heat Flash Floods CPRI Score (Scott County) Hailstorms Landslide Levee Failure Lightning River Floods Severe Winter Storms Sinkholes 2.05 2.50 2.85 2.40 2.80 2.35 2.80 Thunderstorms Tornadoes Wildfires 1.75 2.90 25 CPRI Score (Elko New Market) 2.80 2.50 2.85 2.85 2.4 2.35 2.35 1.75 1.30 2.3 2.40 • 3.40 CPRI Score (Prior Lake) CPRI CPRI Score Score (SMSC) (Jordan) 2.05 1.20 1.35 2.05 1.0 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.65 2.35 2.65 2.65 2.40 1.95 1.90 N/A 2.65 2.80 1.90 N/A 2.85 2.55 2.90 N/A 2.80 2.20 3.55 2.95 CPRI Score (New Prague) 1.75 N/A 1.75 2.40 2.40 2.60 2.05 N/A N/A 1.90 1.65 2.45 N/A 1.75 2.50 2.50 1.65 1.65 3.60 1.90 2.80 2.25 2.35 2.75 1.45 2.75 2.80 1.60 2.20 2.40 1.55 N/A 1.85 291 213 Man-made Hazards Air Transportation Incident Animal/Plant/Crop Disease Energy Failure Fixed Hazardous Materials Fixed Radiological Incident Ground and Water Supply Contamination Highway Transportation Incident 2.50 2.05 2.05 2.05 N/A 2.8 2.55 1.75 1.30 N/A 2.05 1.7 2.80 L 3.60 2.40 3.45 2.30 2.30 N/A 1.45 1.50 1.90 2.35 2.60 N/A N/A 1.95 2.10 2.35 2.60 2.20 Human Disease Incident 2.60 Human Disease Pandemic D. 2.60 Pipeline Transportation 2.4 Incident Public Disorder 1.95 2.8 2.8 2.35 2.70 2.20 2.35 2.80 2.80 2.30 N/AIIIIMI 1.95 1.20 2.50 1.90 2.20 1.5 2.50 1.90 2.35 1.95 2.30 2.70 2.3 1.45 2.35 1.55 2.30 1.95 2.05 2.25 1.85 2.75 2.60 2.00 2.20 1.95 2.30 2.40 2.30 2.30 2.40 2.30 Radiological Transportation N/A Special Events N/A Structural Failure Structural Fire Transportation/Hazardous Materials Utility/Communication/ Infrastructure Failure 2.70 N/A 2.25 2.50 2.8 1.85 2.10 2.75 2.80 2.40 Waterway Incident Table 12. Hazards Ranked by Jurisdiction using the CPRI 2.75 2.40 2.30 N/A 1.45 30 Page 214 4.1.4 Hazard Profiling Concept of Planning The risk assessments identify the characteristics and potential consequences of a disaster, how much of the community could be affected by a disaster, and the impact on community assets. A risk assessment consists of 3 components —hazard identification, risk profile, and vulnerability profile. The last step is the risk ranking for each jurisdiction. Scott County jurisdictions all agreed to the same ranking of hazards in their communities as the County. 4.1.5 GIS and Hazus-MH The risk analysis step in this assessment quantifies the risk to the population, infrastructure, and economy of the community. Hazards that can be geographically identified (wildland fires, windstorms, tornadoes, hail, floods) were mapped. Hazus-MH was used to estimate the damages incurred for a 100 -year flood event and for general asset assessment. Hazus-MH also generates a combination of site -specific and aggregated loss estimates for the entire county due to a 100 -year flood event. Aggregate inventory loss estimates, which include building stock analysis, are based upon the assumption that building stock is evenly distributed across each census block. Therefore, it is possible that overestimates of damage will occur in some areas while underestimates will occur in other areas. With this in mind, total losses tend to be more reliable over larger geographic areas (groups of many blocks) than for individual census blocks. It is important to note that Hazus-MH is not intended to be a substitute for detailed engineering studies. Rather, it is intended to serve as a planning aid for communities interested in assessing their risk to flood-, earthquake-, and hurricane -related hazards. This documentation does not provide full details on the processes and procedures completed in the development of this project. It is only intended to highlight the major steps that were followed. Site -specific analysis is based upon loss estimations for individual structures. For flooding, analysis of sitespecific structures takes into account the depth of water in relation to the structure. Hazus- MH also considers the actual dollar exposure to the structure for the costs of building reconstruction, content, and inventory. However, damages are based upon the assumption that each structure will fall into a structural class, and structures in each class will respond in a similar fashion to a specific depth of flooding. Site -specific analysis is also based upon a point location rather than a polygon, therefore the model does not account for the percentage of a building that is inundated. These assumptions suggest that the loss estimates for site -specific structures as well as for aggregate structural losses need to be viewed as approximations of losses that are subject to considerable variability rather than as exact engineering estimates of losses to individual structures. 4.1.6 National Centers for Environmental Information(NCEI) Records Historical storm event data was compiled from the National Centers for Environmental Information(NCEI). NCEI records are estimates of damage reported to the National Weather Service (NWS) from various local, state, and federal sources. However, these estimates are often preliminary in nature and may not match the final assessment of economic and property losses related to given weather events. 311 215 The NCEI data included 502 reported events in Scott County between 1950 and January 2019. However, some weather event categories only had available data going back as recent as 1996. No records before 1950 were available. A summary table of events related to each hazard type is included in the hazard profile sections that follow. A full table listing all events, including additional details, is included in Appendix C. NCEI hazard categories used in this plan are listed in Table 13. Hazard Tornado Hail Thunderstorm Wind Flood/Flash Flood Winter Weather/ Winter storm/ Blizzard Cold/Wind Chill Excessive Heat/Heat Lightning Heavy Rain Table 13. National Centers for Environmental Information Historical Hazards 4.1.7 FEMA Declared Disasters Another historical perspective is derived from FEMA-declared disasters. 14 major disaster have occurred in Scott County between 1957 and 2025 (Figure 5). Figure 5. FEMA-Declared Disasters and Emergencies in Scott County, 1953-2024 Click on an incident or county to filter the visualization. Click again to resei, 9 flood Ctil 2 Severe Storm Cs] 1 Drought Sr I Hurricane 1 lorncdo 4) Open 5 VtElMai) c onthbutors dig Number of Decrarot;ons Table 14 and Table 15 show the details of the disasters including payments for Public Assistance (PA) and Individual Assistance (IA), listed under the flooding and severe storm profiles. No declarations were made for the other storms listed in the NCEI database. Reviewing the federal payments for damages from the declared disasters is a way of correlating the impact from the NCEI report. 32 IPag 216 Incident Declaration Date and Disaster Number Incident Period Total PA Obligated by FEMA for Disaster in Minnesota Total PA Obligated by FEMA for Disaster in Scott County Individual Assistance in Minnesota Individual Assistance in Scott County Severe Winter Storm, Straight Line Winds, and Flooding June 12 , 2019 DR -4442 3/12/2019- 4/28/2019 Information not available Information not available Information not available Information not available Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, Flooding, Landslides, Mudslides 7/21/2014 DR -4182 6/11/2014 - 7/11/2014 $15,995,142 $2,659,888 None None Severe Storms, Flooding 5/10/2011 DR 1982 3/16/2011- 5/25/2011 $20,633,792 $283,172 Unknown None Flooding 4/19/2010 DR -1900 3/1/2010-$12,740,604 4/26/2010 $31,156 None None Flooding 5/16/2001 DR -1370 3/23/20017/3/2001 $36,227,572 $89,584 $3,650,492 $1,172 Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, Tornadoes 6/23/1998 DR 1225 5/15/1998- 6/28/1998 $30,805,556 Unknown Unknown None Severe Storms, Flooding 4/8/1997 DR 1175 3/21/1997- 5/24/1997 $230,488,750 Unknown Unknown Unknown Flooding, Severe Storms, Tornadoes 6/11/1993 DR -993 5/6/1993 - 8/25/1993 $98,169,850 Unknown Unknown Unknown Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Flooding 8/6/1987 DR 797 7/20/19878/5/1987 Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Flooding 4/18/1969 DR 255 4/18/1969 Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Flooding 4/11/1965 DR -188 4/11/1965 Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown * Data provided by FEMA Region Von March 4, 2019 MN HSEM on December 10, 2014, and https://www.fema.gov/mediahttps://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/28331 accessed on September 10library/assets/documents/28331 accessed on September 10 2019. Values are estimates collected at the time of the disaster. Table 14. FEMA-Declared Major Disasters in Scott County (1953-2024) 33IPage 217 Incident Declaration Date and Disaster Number Incident Period Individual Assistance in Minnesota Public Assistance (all affected areas) Flooding 3/19/2010 EM 3310 3/1/2010 - 4/26/2010 Unknown Unknown Hurricane Katrina Evacuation 9/13/2005 EM- 3242 8/29/2005 - 10/1/2005 $0 $2,470,003 Drought 6/17/1976 EM 3013 6/17/1976 Unknown Unknown *Note the Public Assistance totals are for ALL counties affected in the disaster. Data accessed May 3, 2019 at h tips://www. fema.gov/data-visual ization-d isaster-declarations-states-and-coun ties Table 15. FEMA-Declared Emergencies in Scott County (1974-2024) Table 16 depicts the historical projects in Scott County resulting from hazard mitigation funding. Year Project Description Sub -Grantee Federal Share 2015 Property Acquisition- (Schendlinger) Scott County $101, 973 2015 Scott County- All Hazard Mitigation Plan Scott County $22,469 2010 Minnesota Valley Electric Coop - Replace overhead line with underground Minnesota Valley Cooperative Light & Power Assoc. $769,013 2007 Scott County - All Hazard Mitigation Plan Scott County $30,000 Total HMA Funding - Scott County $821,482 Table 16. Historical Hazard Mitigation Funding in Scott County 34I1agL 218 4.2 Vulnerability Assessment 4.2.1 Asset Inventory The Hazus-MH defaults, critical facilities, and essential facilities have been updated based on the most recent available data sources. The Hazus-MH default essential facilities have been updated based on current data available from the state and county. The essential facility updates (schools, medical facilities, fire stations, and police stations) were integrated into the Hazus-MH input database. Other critical facilities identified by the county were geocoded and overlaid with the Hazus-MH flood model output. Table 17 below identifies the critical facilities that were included in the analysis. Essential facilities are a subset of critical facilities. Names and locations of all critical facilities are found in Appendix B. Figure 6 below maps the critical facilities in Shakopee, while Figure 7 depicts critical facilities in Savage. Figure 8 maps critical facilities in Prior Lake, Figure 9 shows critical facilities in Jordan, Figure 10 maps critical facilities in Belle Plaine, Figure 11 displays critical facilities in New Prague, and Figure 12 shows critical facilities in Elko New Market. Category Number of Facilities Agriculture and Food 3 Banking and Finance 42 Chemical and Hazardous Materials 62 Commercial Facilities 46 Communications 2 Dams 22 Defense Industrial Base 0 Emergency Services 20 Energy 3 Table 17. Scott County Critical Infrastructure and Facilities Category Number of Facilities Government Facilities 47 Healthcare and Public Health 28 Information Technology 0 Manufacturing 4 National Monuments and Icons 10 Nuclear 0 Postal and Shipping 8 Transportation 0 Water 22 351YagL 219 MN Geospatial Commons. MPCA • Small Quantity Hazardous Waste Generator • Large Quantity Hazardous Waste Generator C; Underground Tank * Government Facility School ▪ Post Office Figure 6. Critical Facilities in Shakopee 361 220 Figure 7: Critical Facilities in Savage MN Geospatiai Cornrows MPCA r' • Small Quantity Hazardous Waste Generator • Large Quantity Hazardous Waste Generator • Underground Tank * Government Facility School Q Post Office Figure 8: Critical Facilities in Prior Lake MN Geospatial Commons. MPCA Small Quantity Hazardous Waste Generator Large Quantity Hazardous Waste Generator Underground Tank Government Facility School Post Once Upper Prior Lake 371 221 Figure 9: Critical Facilities in Jordan • Small Quantity Hazardous Waste Generator • Large Quantity Hazardous Waste Generator (C Underground Tank * Government Facrlity Setae! ❑ Post Office MN C spatal Commons, MPCA Figure 10. Critical Facilities in Belle Plaine MN Geospaual Commons. MPCA • Small Ouant ty Hazardous Waste Generator • Large Quantity Hazardous Waste Generator v Underground Tank * Government Facility School ▪ Post Office I I 381 mat; 222 Figure 11. Critical Facilities in New Prague MN Geospatial Commons, MPCA Figure 12 Critical Fadlitiesn Elko New Market MN Geospatial Commons. MPCA • Small Quantity Hazardous Waste Generator • Large Quantity Hazardous Waste Generator U - Underground Tank * Government Facility School Q Post Office • Small Quantity Hazardous Waste Generator • Large Quantity Hazardous Waste Generator o Underground Tank * Government Facility School Q Post Office 39IPage 223 4.2.2 Facility Replacement Costs Hazus-MH MR4 contains the base aggregated general building stock used for estimating building exposure. Hazus-MH MR4 contains aggregated general building stock updated to Dun & Bradstreet 2006 and building valuations were updated to R.S. Means 2006. Building counts based on census housing unit counts are available for RES1 (single-family dwellings) and RES2 (manufactured housing) classifications instead of actual building counts. Facility replacement costs and total building exposure are identified in Table 18, which also includes the estimated number of buildings within each occupancy class as calculated by Hazus general building stock General Estimated Total Occupancy Buildings Agriculture Commercial Education Government Industrial Religious/Non- Profit 1,157 1,105 55 429 466 102 Total Building Exposure $2,280,000 $3,245,000 $732,000 $2,120,000 $9,421,000 $393,000 Residential 44,007 $72.122,000 Total: 47,321 $90,313,000 Table 18. Scott County Total Building Exposure 4.3 Future Development Because Scott County is vulnerable to a variety of natural and technological hazards, the county government —in partnership with the state government —must make a commitment to prepare for the management of these types of events. Scott County is committed to ensuring that county elected and appointed officials become informed leaders regarding community hazards so that they are better prepared to set and direct policies for emergency management and county response. The Scott County Deputy Emergency Management Director will work to keep the jurisdictions covered by the Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan engaged and informed during the plan's cycle. By keeping jurisdictional leaders actively involved in the monitoring, evaluation and update of the MHMP, they will keep their local governments aware of the hazards that face their communities and how to mitigate those hazards through planning and project implementation. Each jurisdiction has identified mitigation strategies they will seek to implement in their communities (see Section 5.3.2). Jurisdictions will include considerations for hazard mitigation in relation to future development when updating local comprehensive plans or other plans that may influence development. 40 IPage 224 4.4 Hazard Profiles 4.4.1 Summer Storms (Tornadoes, Windstorms, Lightning, Hail) Tornadoes Tornadoes are defined as violently -rotating columns of air extending from thunderstorms to the ground, with wind speeds between 40-300 mph. They develop under 3 scenarios: (1) along a squall line; (2) in connection with thunderstorm squall lines during hot, humid weather; and (3) in the outer portion of a tropical cyclone. Funnel clouds are rotating columns of air not in contact with the ground; however, the column of air can reach the ground very quickly and become a tornado. Since 2007, tornado strength in the United States is ranked based on the Enhanced Fujita scale (EF scale), replacing the Fujita scale introduced in 1971. The EF scale uses similar principles to the Fujita scale, with 6 categories from 0-5, based on wind estimates and damage caused by the tornado. The EF Scale is used extensively by the NWS in investigating tornadoes (all tornadoes are now assigned an EF Scale number), and by engineers in correlating damage to buildings and techniques with different wind speeds caused by tornadoes. To see a comparative table of F and EF scales, see http://www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/tornado/ef-scale.html. Figure 13. Damage from Tornado in Belle Plaine, MN, July 15, 2019 In Minnesota, the peak months of tornado occurrence are June and July. The typical time of day for tornadoes in Minnesota ranges between 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Most of these are minor tornadoes, with wind speeds under 125 miles per hour. A typical Minnesota tornado lasts approximately 10 minutes, has a path length of 5 to 6 miles, is nearly as wide as a football field, has a forward speed of about 35 miles an hour, and affects less than 0.1% of the county warned. Tornado History in Scott County According to the NCEI, 18 tornadoes were reported in Scott County between 1950 and September of 2019, causing no deaths or injuries, and $550,000 dollars in property damage. Tornado classification ranged from FO/EF0 to F2 on the Fujita Scale. The most recent tornado occurred in July of 2019 (Table 19), causing significant property damage to a local farm. Figure 14 below shows tornado touchdown points and tracks in Scott County from 1950 - September, 2025 Historic tornado events in the county are listed in Table 19. 41 IPage 225 Location or County Date Magnitude Deaths Injuries Property Damage Prior Lake 09/17/2021 EFO 0 0 $250,000 Blakely 05/19/2021 EFO 0 0 0 Belle Plaine Township 7/15/2019 EFO 0 0 0 Prior Lake 8/16/2017 EFO 0 0 0 New Prague 8/16/2017 EFO 0 0 0 Blakeley 6/10/2012 EFO 0 0 $250,000 St Patrick 6/26/2010 EFO 0 0 0 Belle Plaine 8/3/2002 FO 0 0 0 New Market 6/11/2001 Fl 0 0 $50,000 Belle Plaine 5/9/2001 FO 0 0 0 New Prague 5/9/2001 FO 0 0 0 New Prague 5/9/2001 FO 0 0 0 New Market 5/9/2001 FO 0 0 0 Blakeley 7/30/1999 FO 0 0 0 Belle Plaine 7/30/1999 Fl 0 0 0 Lydia 7/30/1999 FO 0 0 0 Savage 6/5/1999 FO 0 0 0 Savage 8/22/1998 FO 0 0 0 Lydia 7/21/1995 Fl 0 0 0 Scott County 5/21/1977 F2 0 0 $250,000 Source: National Centers for Environmental Information Table 19. Historic Tornado Events in Scott County, 1950 -September, 2023 42IPage 226 Figure 14. Tornado Touchdowns and Paths, Scott County, 1950-2024 °}96.10.29- 1965-0506 EF-Scale= F -Scale= F4 1996-06-06 CF -Sale= F0 QOQ Tornado Touchdown Tornado Path 1 -07.30 l =F12,a 1997-07.13 1999-07.30 GF-L 2001-08-03 OF-'sa'e= F3 0 ;tale= -0 CoF-;.;ale= FC Belle PlaiiL41 t 49 Q' F=ica'.e= FC 968-06-13 F -Stye= FO Jordan 2017-08-1 Shakopee 2001-05-09 FC 2001-05-09 CF-Sca e= FC N,w Pra8ue 1998.06.27 OF -Scale= FO /977-05-21 V2010-06-26 F.Scale= F2 F -Scale= EF0 Prior Lake 2017-08-16 F-2.c.a,= FC 2001-05-09 CF-Sca'0= FC 1979-05-22 1991-05-30,...,1 81-06-14 F -Scale= F2!F-`Fair= FC.CA F3 15^-08 12 199946-05 FO Savage 2001-05-09 CF -Scat= Fr 201 -1 1-10 :xale= EFO 2001-09-09 @F -Scale= F3 /� 1987-05-13 VFW le=F1 1969-07-13 159 25 NOAA's National Weather Service Storm Prediction Center Tornadoes and Climate Change Tornadoes and other severe thunderstorm phenomena frequently cause as much annual property damage in the U.S. as do hurricanes, and often cause more deaths. Although recent research has yielded insights into the connections between global warming and the factors that cause tornados and severe thunderstorms, such as atmospheric instability and increases in wind speed with altitude (Gensini & Brooks, Spatial Trends in United States Tornado Frequency, 2018), these relationships remain mostly unexplored, largely because of the challenges in observing thunderstorms and tornadoes and simulating them with computer models (Gensini & Mote, Estimations of Hazardous Convective Weather in the United States Using Dynamical Downscaling, 2014). According to Harold Brooks of NOAA's National Severe Weather Laboratory, there is increasing variability in the "start" of tornado season. The number of days with more than 30 EF1 or greater tornadoes is increasing, while the number of days with at least 1 EF1 or greater tornadoes is decreasing. Thus, tornadoes are occurring on fewer days, but more are occurring on outbreak days. Tornadoes have not been recorded in Minnesota in the winter months of December, January and February (MN DNR, 2014). However, the state of Wisconsin has recorded 3 tornadoes in January and 6 in December during the period of 1844-2013 (National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office, 2014) including a recent January tornado in 2008. 43 227 Windstorms FEMA defines winds in excess of 58 miles per hour, excluding tornadoes, as windstorms. Straight- line winds and windstorms are used interchangeably in the plan. This hazard is treated as a different category than tornadoes (which may also include high winds). Windstorms are among the nation's most severe natural hazards in terms of both lives lost and property damaged. Severe winds can damage and destroy roofs, toss manufactured homes off their pier foundations, and tear light -framed homes apart. There are several different types of windstorms. A "downburst" is defined as a strong downdraft with an outrush of damaging winds on or near the earth's surface. Downbursts may have wind gusts up to 130 mph and are capable of the same damage as a medium- sized tornado. A "gust front" is the leading edge of the thunderstorm downdraft air. It is most prominent near the rain -free cloud base and on the leading edge of an approaching thunderstorm and is usually marked by gusty, cool winds and sometimes by blowing dust. Windstorm History in Scott County Scott County frequently experiences winds blowing at over 50 knots. According to NCEI records there have been 104 thunderstorm wind events reported between 1950 and April 2025, with wind speeds of up to 90 knots. These winds can inflict damage to buildings and in some cases overturn highprofile vehicles. The most recent severe wind and hail storms in Scott County are shown in Figure 15. NOAA's National Weather Service Storm Prediction Center '�Z105 Shakopee r,.a e9. t'.e32006 '.. 2219_ v,a A txs .;,2 Ilia ror 211 � 20; "'® A' 'OJ5A 3 090.1114,:011� .fir5New Prague _ Elko Nev. Market At Figure 15. Most Recent Severe Wind and Hail Storms in Scott County 44IPag,. 228 Windstorms and Climate Change Lack of high -quality long-term data sets make assessment of changes in wind speeds very difficult (Kunkel, et al., 2013). One analysis generally found no evidence of significant changes in wind speed distribution. Other trends in severe storms, including the numbers of hurricanes and the intensity and frequency of tornadoes, hail, and damaging thunderstorm winds are uncertain. Since the impact of more frequent or intense storms can be larger than the impact of average temperature, climate scientists are actively researching the connections between climate change and severe storms (Gensini & Mote, Estimations of Hazardous Convective Weather in the United States Using Dynamical Downscaling, 2014). Lightning Lightning typically occurs as a by-product of a thunderstorm. In only a few millionths of a second, the air near a lightning strike is heated to 50,000° F, a temperature hotter than the surface of the sun. The hazard posed by lightning is significant. High winds, rainfall, and a darkening cloud cover are the warning signs for possible cloud -to -ground lightning strikes. While many lightning casualties happen at the beginning of an approaching storm, more than half of lightning deaths occur after a thunderstorm has passed. Lightning has been known to strike more than 10 miles from the storm in an area with clear sky above. Lightning strikes the ground approximately 25 million times each year in the U.S. According to the NWS, the chance of an individual in the U.S. being killed or injured by lightning during a given year is 1 in 240,000 (NOAA National Severe Storms Laboratory, n.d.). Lightning is the most dangerous and frequently encountered weather hazard that most people in the United States experience annually. Lightning is the second most frequent killer in the U.S., behind floods and flash floods, with nearly 100 deaths and 500 injuries annually. The lightning current can branch off to strike a person from a tree, fence, pole, or other tall object. In addition, an electrical current may be conducted through the ground to a person after lightning strikes a nearby tree, antenna, or other tall object. The current may also travel through power lines, telephone lines, or plumbing pipes to damage property or cause fires. Lightning History in Scott County The NCEI has recorded 4 lightning events in Scott County, resulting in one injury in 1996. No deaths were reported. (NOAA,2025) Lightning and Climate Change The projected possible intensity and frequency of tornadoes, hail, and damaging thunderstorm winds, the conditions associated with lightning, are uncertain (Gensini & Mote, Estimations of Hazardous Convective Weather in the United States Using Dynamical Downscaling, 2014). Severe rain events are becoming more common and may include an additional risk of lightning. Hail 45 IPage 229 Hailstorms are a product of severe thunderstorms. Hail is formed when strong updrafts within the storm carry water droplets above the freezing level, where they remain suspended and continue to grow larger, until their weight can no longer be supported by the winds. Hailstones can vary in size, depending on the strength of the updraft. The NWS uses the following descriptions when estimating hail sizes: pea size is 1/4 -inch, marble size is 1/2 -inch, dime size is 3/4 -inch, quarter size is 1 - inch, golf ball size is 1 3A -inches, and baseball size is 2 3A -inches. Individuals who serve as volunteer "storm spotters" for the NWS are located throughout the state, and are instructed to report hail dime size (3/4 -inch) or greater. Hailstorms can occur throughout the year; however, the months of maximum hailstorm frequency are typically between May and August. Although hailstorms rarely cause injury or loss of life, they can cause significant property damage. Hail History in Scott County Hail is a particular concern in Scott County due to the damage it can inflict on agriculture. Table 20 shows storms producing hail greater than 1 inch diameter in Scott County. Date Hail Size Injuries 8/03/2024 1 0 5/27/2024 .88 0 10/24/2023 1 0 10/24/2023 1 0: 7/10/2023 1 0' 7/10/2023 1.5 0 5/19/2022 1 0 5/19/2022 2.00 0 5/11/2022 2 0 5/11/2022 1.5 0 4/12/2022 1 0 8/24/2021 .88 0 6/17/2021 1 0 6/17/2021 1 0 6/17/2021 1 6/17/2021 8/10/2020 1 1.75 0 0 0 7/09/2020 .75 0 7/09/2020 1 0 6/02/2020 .88 0 9/02/2019 1 0 7/22/2019 2.00 0 7/9/2017 1.25 0 6/22/2016 1.25 0 Date 7/7/2014 6/17/2012 5/29/2008 8/13/2007 7/3/2007 6/20/2007 Hail Size Injuries 1.75 0 1.75 0 1.75 0 1.5 0 1.75 0 1.75 0 6/20/2007 1.25 0 6/20/2007 1.75 0 6/20/2007 2.75 0 6/20/2007 1.5 0 6/20/2007 1.75 0 6/20/2007 1.75 0 6/20/2007 1.75 0 8/24/2006 8/24/2006 3 0 3 0 8/24/2006 1.75 0 8/24/2006 1.75 0 8/24/2006 2.75 0 8/24/2006 1.75 0 8/24/2006 4.25 0 8/24/2006 3 0 8/24/2006 1.75 0 8/24/2006 1.75 0 6/24/2006 1.5 0 Date Hail Size Injuries 6/11/2001 1.75 0 6/6/1999 1.75 0 6/5/1999 3 6/5/1999 2.75 r 6/26/1998 1.75 0 0 0 5/15/1998 1.75 0 5/15/1998 2 0 8/15/1997 1.75 0 8/15/1997 1.75 0 8/15/1997 1.75 0 7/13/1997 1.75 0 7/13/1997 1.75 0 7/1/1997 2 0 7/1/1997 1.25 0 6/28/1997 2 0 6/30/1994 1.75 6/30/1994 ! 1.75 0 0 8/1/1992 1.75 0 5/30/1985 1.75 0 4/20/1985 1.75 0 4/29/1981 1.75 0 8/19/1980 1.75 0 5/23/1977 1.75 0 7/29/1973 2.5 0 46 IPage 230 6/29/2015 1.5 0 6/22/2015 1.75 0 8/9/2005 1.75 0 7/14/2003 1.25 0 7/17/1956 1.75 0 6/19/1956 3 0 Source: National Centers for Environmental Information Table 20. Storms producing hail of greater than 1 inch diameter in Scott County, 1950 -September, 2025 Hail and Climate Change According to the Federal Advisory Committee Draft National Climate Assessment (NCA), trends in severe storms, including the numbers of hurricanes and the intensity and frequency of tornadoes, hail, and damaging thunderstorm winds are uncertain. Since the impact of more frequent or intense storms can be larger than the impact of average temperature, climate scientists are actively researching the connections between climate change and severe storms (Gensini & Mote, Estimations of Hazardous Convective Weather in the United States Using Dynamical Downscaling, 2014). The occurrence of very heavy precipitation has increased in Minnesota in recent decades and future projections also indicate this will continue (International Climate Adaptation Team, 2013). While it is unknown if this precipitation will occur during severe storms that produce hail, the possibility has not been ruled out. Vulnerability Summer storms affect Scott County each year, so there is a 100% probability that the county and its jurisdictions will be affected. According to the 64 -year NCEI record, there is a 52% chance of a significant hailstorm any year in Scott County and a 30% chance in each year that there will be a hailstorm that produces hail greater than 1 inch in size. According to the NCEI Storm Events Database, the county has experienced tornadoes in 9 of the 69 years on record. However, 16 of the 17 tornadoes on record occurred since 1995. According to these statistics, there is a 33% chance of a tornado affecting Scott County each year. The magnitude of summer storms each year is unpredictable and within Scott County the vulnerability of jurisdictions to summer storms does not vary geographically. The vulnerability of each jurisdiction to severe summer storms has not changed due to any development in the last 5 years. Severe Summer Storms and Electrical Outages According to NOAA data, the natural hazards that caused the greatest overall property loss in Minnesota between 1996 and 2014 were thunderstorms and lightning, at $86.3 million per year. The state also experienced 23 electric transmission outages from 1992 to 2009, 5 of which were due to heat waves and thunderstorms. On average, the number of people affected annually by all electric outages during 2008 to 2013 in Minnesota was 449,995, with a high of 1,460,810 in 2011 (U.S. Department of Energy, 2016). Plans and Programs in Place Public Warning and Notification - In the event of emergencies or hazardous conditions that require timely and targeted communication to the public, Scott County utilizes the CodeRED Mass Notification System. Scott County will also utilize Wireless Emergency Alerts for large incidents 47IPage 231 which require immediate notification. Scott County will provide updates on most emergency situations through their social media sites throughout the duration of the event. Stormwater Ordinance - Scott County maintains a stormwater ordinance. SKYWARN Program - Scott County participates in SKYWARN. These volunteers help keep their local communities safe by providing timely and accurate reports of severe weather to their local National Weather Service office. Scott County emergency management maintains a volunteer group called SAFCOM who are all SKYWARN trained, to assist in spotting and reporting severe weather events. Severe Weather Awareness Week - Scott County helps promote and participates in the National Weather Service's "Severe Weather Awareness Week" held in April each year. The event seeks to educate residents on the dangers of severe summer storms and highlights the importance of preparing for severe weather before it strikes. Emergency Operations Plan - Scott County maintains an Emergency Operations Plan, which is designed as a guide for emergency operations. It is intended to assist key county/city officials and emergency organizations to carry out their responsibilities for the protection of life and property under a wide range of emergency conditions, including debris clearance. 4.4.2 Flash Flood and Riverine Flood Flooding is a significant natural hazard throughout the United States. The type, magnitude, and severity of flooding are functions of the amount and distribution of precipitation over a given area, the rate at which precipitation infiltrates the ground, the geometry and hydrology of the catchment, and flow dynamics and conditions in and along the river channel. Upstream floods, also called flash floods, occur in the upper parts of drainage basins and are generally characterized by periods of intense rainfall over a short duration. These floods arise with very little warning and often result in locally intense damage, and sometimes loss of life, due to the high energy of the flowing water. Flood waters can snap trees, topple buildings, and easily move large boulders or other structures. Six inches of rushing water can upend a person; another 18 inches might carry off a car. Generally, upstream floods cause damage over relatively localized areas, but they can be quite severe. Urban flooding is a type of upstream flood, which involves the overflow of storm drain systems and can be the result of inadequate drainage combined with heavy rainfall or rapid snowmelt Upstream or flash floods can occur at any time of the year in Minnesota, but they are most common in the spring and summer. 16 flash floods have been recorded in Scott County since 1997. Downstream floods, sometimes called riverine floods, refer to floods on large rivers at locations with large upstream catchments. Downstream floods are typically associated with precipitation events that are of relatively long duration and occur over large areas. Flooding on small tributary streams may be limited, but the contribution of increased runoff may result in a large flood downstream. The lag time between precipitation and the flood peak is much longer for downstream floods than for upstream floods, generally providing ample warning for people to move to safe locations and, to some extent, secure some property against damage. Nationwide, floods caused 4,586 deaths from 1959 to 2005 while property and crop damage averaged nearly $8 billion per year (in 2011 dollars) from 1981-2011 (Georgakakos, et al., 2014). 48 IPage 232 Flood History in Scott County According to the state of Minnesota, there have been 32 significant flood related events in Scott County, none since the 2021 Multi Hazard Mitigation Plan update. The heavy rains of August 18-20, 2007 resulted in major flood damage throughout southeastern Minnesota, including Scott County. A 24 -hour rainfall record was broken in the state, with over 15 inches falling near Hokah in Houston County. Hundreds of homes and businesses were impacted, and reports of stream flooding, urban flooding, mudslides, and road closures were numerous throughout southern Minnesota. On June 28, 1998 heavy rainfall resulted in the severe flooding of Sand Creek in the town of Jordan, described as the worst flooding since 1963. 2 bridges were washed out. Because of the rapid response of volunteers and emergency personnel in erecting a wall with 38,000 sandbags, flooding damage was minimized. The Jordan NWS cooperative observer reported 6.80 inches of rain between the 24th and the 27th with over 4 inches falling on the 26th. Members of the steering committee in 2016 continue to note the potential harm of Sand Creek flooding in Jordan, but that USACE studies have not found cost-effective solutions. Flash flooding was widespread on October 4, 2005. Streets and residential basements flooded and water retention ponds overflowed their walls in Shakopee. Several gravel alleys and streets were washed out. A classroom had to be relocated at the Sweeney Elementary School when it sustained water damage from the flooding. Spring flooding in 2010 resulted in the Highway 101 Bridge over the Minnesota River in Shakopee closing. The NCEI reported $400,000 in property damage. In late November of 2015, a new County Road 101 bridge opened between Scott and Carver counties. The former bridge was underwater 4 times between 2010 and 2015, with resulting closures lasting from a few days to a several weeks. Its new replacement is built above the 100 -year floodplain (Star Tribune, 2015). On July 13, 2013 a flash flood occurred in Shakopee resulting in $500,000 in property damage. 10 of the 11 FEMA disaster declarations in Scott County have included flooding. A recent disaster declaration occurred in the summer of 2014, due to flooding, winds, storms, landslides and mudslides. According to NCEI data, the flood resulted in a total of $9 million in property damage. Scott County received over $2.5 million in public assistance from FEMA. Scott county has worked diligently with communities and landowners to acquire repetitive loss structures and limit development in hazard prone areas. 49IPage 233 (see Section 4.4.8 Landslides and Soil Erosion). Figure 18. Flood Damage on County Road 16, Shakopee, June 27, 2014 (Noess, 2014) The June 2014 flood resulted in landslides, washed out roads in Shakopee (Figure 18), Blakeley, Prior Lake and Belle Plaine, and record high levels on the Minnesota River (Belle Plaine Herald, 2015). Flooding also created farm field gullies, washed-out culverts, and stream bank erosion (Shakopee Valley News, 2015). Homeowners in low-lying areas and close to Prior Lake had to canoe to their homes in some cases. Residents in the Watersedge Trail neighborhood placed 10,000 sandbags in 3 hours with the help of 300 volunteers. Prior Lake shattered records when it reached nearly 907 feet in July - a no -wake restriction resulted for most of the boating season (Carlson, 2015). One house was estimated to be surrounded by up to 3,000 sandbags. One potential danger with sandbags, however, is that high winds can create waves that crest the wall and knock it over (Blume, 2014). Figure 19. Valleyfair Floodwaters, Shakopee, 2014 (KARE-Sky 11, 2014) The NCEI reported that mudslides in Blakeley closed train tracks in the area, impacting Union Pacific and Canadian Pacific rail operations. Highways 6, 41, and 101 were closed due to high water levels on the Minnesota River. The entire town of Blakeley was evacuated due to the high river levels. Getting in and out of town became nearly impossible due to fallen trees and damaged roads (McDonough, 2014). Landslides and mudslides also occurred around Blakeley The township of Louisville, north of Jordan and west of Prior Lake, had 2 homes surrounded by floodwaters during the height of the flood, and Highway 169 provided the only access from Scott County. In Shakopee, 3 rides were shut down at Valleyfair due to floodwaters that spilled into the park and across its parking lots (Figure 19). Table 21 below lists Scott County's historical floods from 1997 -September 2025 as recorded by the NCEI. Although no deaths or injuries were recorded with these floods, property damage from 7 of the floods resulted in over $12 million in losses. 50 page 234 Location or County Date Type Deaths Injuries Property Damage Jordan 3/14/2019 Flood 0 0 $900,000(estimate) Shakopee 8/16/2017 Flash Flood 0 0 0 Prior Lake 8/10/2016 Flash Flood 0 0 0 Belle Plaine 6/19/2014 Flash Flood 0 0 0 Blakeley 6/18/2014 Flood 0 0 $9,000,000 Shakopee 7/13/2013 Flash Flood 0 0 $500,000 St Patrick 3/21/2011 Flood 0 0 0 Belle Plaine 8/13/2010 Flash Flood 0 0 0 Shakopee 6/26/2010 Flash Flood 0 0 0 Blakeley 6/26/2010 Flash Flood 0 0 $50,000 Prior Lake 6/26/2010 Flash Flood 0 0 0 Shakopee 3/20/2010 Flood 0 0 $400,000 Shakopee 3/19/2010 Flood 0 0 0 St Patrick 3/17/2010 Flood 0 0 0 Deer Park 3/13/2010 Flood 0 0 0 Jordan 3/12/2010 Flood 0 0 0 Shakopee 8/8/2009 Flash Flood 0 0 0 Jordan 3/19/2007 Flood 0 0 $900,000 Jordan 6/16/2006 Flash Flood 0 0 0 Scott County 10/4/2005 Flood 0 0 0 Scott County 10/4/2005 Flash Flood 0 0 0 Scott County 9/4/2005 Flash Flood 0 0 0 Scott County 8/3/2002 Flash Flood 0 0 $200,000 Scott County 5/1/2001 Flood 0 0 0 Scott County 4/1/2001 Flood 0 0 0 Savage 8/22/1998 Flash Flood 0 0 0 Scott County 6/28/1998 Flood 0 0 0 Belle Plaine 7/25/1997 Flash Flood 0 0 0 Prior Lake 7/22/1997 Flash Flood 0 0 0 Scott County 5/1/1997 Flood 0 0 0 Location or County Date Type Deaths Injuries Property Damage Scott County 4/1/1997 Flood 0 0 0 Scott County 3/15/1997 Flood 0 0 0 Source: National Centers for Environmental Information 51IPage 235 Table 21. Scott County Historical Floods, 1997 -September, 2024 The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service provides information from gauge locations at points along various rivers across the United States. One USGS gauging station is located in the county near Jordan on the Minnesota River. Its flood crest data for the top 10 gauge heights as of 10/01/2025 is recorded in Table 22 below. Date Gauge Height (feet) Stream flow (cfs) 4/11/1965 35.07 117,000 6/24/1993 33.52 92,200 6/25/2014 33.25 76,600 4/18/2001 33.11 87,100 9/30/2010 33.07 74,700 4/14/1969 32.85 84,600 4/12/1997 32.24 82,300 4/29/2001 32.20 82,000 3/25/2019 32.11 78.000 3/28/2011 31.81 72,300 3/23/2010 31.73 80,100 Table 22. Historical Flood Crests for USGS gauging station on the MN River near Jordan Vulnerability and Hazus-MH Hazard Analysis Hazus-MH was used to estimate the damages incurred for a 100 -year flood in Scott County using a 10meter DEM (digital elevation model) to create a flood depth grid from a digital Q3 (digitized paper flood insurance rate map). Scott County -specific building data was sourced from parcel tax databases and building location point databases, including building valuations and occupancy class. Building counts were aggregated from the individual parcel records to the relevant census administrative boundaries. There are an estimated 47,321 buildings in the region with a total replacement value (excluding contents) of $11.3 billion (2010 dollars). Approximately 93% of the buildings (and 77% of the building value) are associated with residential housing. Using the Scott County updated general building stock, the Hazus model reported an estimated 361 buildings will be at least moderately damaged. This is over 58% of the total number of buildings in the scenario. There are an estimated 78 buildings that will be completely destroyed. The total economic loss estimated for the flood is $207.8 million dollars, which represents 6% of the total replacement value of the scenario buildings. Building losses are broken into 2 categories: direct building losses and business interruption losses. Direct building losses are the estimated costs to repair or replace the damage caused to the building and its contents. Business interruption losses are associated with inability to operate a business because of the damage sustained during the flood. Business interruption losses also include the temporary living expenses for those people displaced from their homes because of the flood. The total building -related losses in the Hazus 52 page 236 model was $207.8 million dollars. 1% of the estimated losses were related to business interruption in the region. Residential occupancies made up 56% of the total loss. The reported building counts should be interpreted as degrees of loss rather than an exact number of buildings exposed to flooding. These numbers were derived from aggregate building inventories which are assumed to be dispersed evenly across census blocks. Hazus-MH requires that a predetermined amount of square footage of a typical building sustain damage in order to produce a damaged building count. If only a minimal amount of damage to buildings is predicted, it is possible to see zero damaged building counts while also seeing economic losses. The total estimated number of damaged buildings, total building losses, and estimated total economic losses are shown in Table 23. The distribution of economic losses for Scott County is depicted in Figure 20. General Occupancy Estimated Total Buildings Total Damaged Buildings Total Building Exposure (In $1000s) Total Economic Loss (In $1000s) Building Loss (In $1000s) Agricultural 1,157 0 $206,273 $5,461 $1,754 Commercial 1,105 7 $589,815 $10,438 $2,496 Education 55 0 $573,101 $3,385 $563 Government 429 2 $539,024 $8,983 $1,630 Industrial 466 14 $551,664 $30,507 $7,247 Religious/Non-102 Profit 0 $122,966 $2,071 $302 Residential 44,007 415 $8,667,064 $78,885 $55,478 Total 47,321 438 $11,249,907 $139,730 $69,470 Figure 20. Distribution of Estimated Economic Loss for Scott County in 100 -Year Flood Table 23. Scott County Total Economic Loss from 100 -Year Flood _ SI,Ooo - $50,000 ▪ 551,000 - S700,000 MI 5701,000 - $1,600,000 ▪ $1,601.0000 - $3,000,000 _ $3,001,000 - $6,500,000 - $6,501,000 - $13,226,000 MN DNR. 20101'. Census, FEMA Huus.MH 53 page 237 Census blocks of concern should be reviewed in detail to determine the facilities that fall within the flood hazard areas. Table 24 and Figure 21 shows the floodway, 100 year and 500 flood risk according to the 2026 Minnesota DNR Lake & Flood Elevations Online (LFEO) viewer. Community Buildings at Risk Potential $ Loss Belle Plaine Township Belle Plaine, City of 3 0 $144,753 $0 Blakeley Township 1 $109,244 Cedar Lake Township Credit River, City of 13 1 $2,597,528 $552,792 Elko New Market, City of 0 $0 Helena Township Jackson Townshi 17 0 $4,469,987 $0 Jordan, City of 201 $36,585,984 Louisville Townshi 8 $237,942 New Market Township 1 $3,113 New Prague, City of Prior Lake, City of 5 61 $25,531 $3,244,654 Saint Lawrence Township 3 $348,600 Sand Creek Townshi 9 $8,743,219 Savage, City of 81 $129,154,945 Shakopee, City of 22 $20,857,000 Spring Lake Township 27 $721,760 Table 24. Scott County Structures at risk in a 100 -Year Flood 54 IPage 238 Figure 21. Floodway & Floodplains Map used from MN DNR "Lake and Flood Elevations"ArcGIS 55IPage 239 Hazus-MH Shelter Requirement Analysis Hazus-MH estimates the number of households that are expected to be displaced from their homes due to the flood and the associated potential evacuation. Hazus-MH also estimates those displaced people that may require accommodations in temporary public shelters. The model estimates 996 households may be displaced due to the flood. Displacement includes households evacuated from within or very near to the inundated area. Of these, the model estimates 1,812 people (out of a total population of 129,928) may seek temporary shelter in public shelters. Hazus-MH Debris Generation Analysis Hazus estimates the amount of debris that may be generated by the flood. The model breaks debris into 3 general categories: 1) Finishes (dry wall, insulation, etc.), 2) Structural (wood, brick, etc.) and 3) Foundations (concrete slab, concrete block, rebar, etc.). This distinction is made because of the different types of material handling equipment required to handle the debris. The model estimates that a total of 24,072 tons of debris would be generated. Of the total amount, Finishes composes 36% of the total and Structural composes 37% of the total. If the debris tonnage is converted into an estimated number of truckloads, it would require 963 truckloads (@25 tons/truck) to remove the debris generated by the flood. Flooding and Climate Change As Minnesota's climate changes, the quantity and character of precipitation is changing. Average precipitation has increased in the Midwest since 1900, with more increases in recent years. The Midwest has seen a 45% increase in very heavy precipitation (defined as the heaviest 1% of all daily events) from 1958 to 2011 (Gensini & Mote, Estimations of Hazardous Convective Weather in the United States Using Dynamical Downscaling, 2014). This precipitation change has led to amplified magnitudes of flooding. Increased precipitation may also show seasonal changes, trending toward wetter springs and drier summers and falls. An example of a recent year with this character was 2012, when many MN counties were eligible for federal disaster assistance for drought, while others were eligible for flooding, and 7 were eligible for both in the same year (Seeley, 2013). In 2007, 24 Minnesota counties received drought designation, while 7 counties were declared flood disasters. In 2012, 55 Minnesota counties received federal drought designation at the same time 11 counties declared flood emergencies. In addition, the yearly frequency of the largest storms - those with 3 inches or more of rainfall in a single day - has more than doubled in just over 50 years. In the past decade, such dramatic rains have increased by more than 7% (MN Environmental Quality Board, 2014). Southeastern Minnesota has experienced three 1000 -year floods in the past decade: in September 2004, August 2007, and September 2010 (Meador, 2013). The 2004 flood occurred when parts of south- central Minnesota received over 8 inches of precipitation. Faribault and Freeborn counties received over 10 inches in 36 hours. The deluge led to numerous reports of stream flooding, urban flooding, mudslides, and road closures (MN DNR, 2004). During the 2007 event, 15.10 inches fell in 24 hours in Houston County, the largest 24 -hour rainfall total ever recorded by an official National Weather Service reporting location. The previous Minnesota record was 10.84 inches in 1972. The resulting flooding from the 2007 rainfall caused 7 fatalities (MN DNR, 2007). In September 2010, a 56 page 240 storm on the 22 -23rd resulted in more than 6 inches of rain falling over 5,000 square miles in southern Minnesota. Rainfall totals of more than 8 inches were reported in portions of 10 counties. The heavy rain, falling on soils already sodden from a wet summer, led to numerous reports of major rural and urban flooding. For many monitoring locations in southern Minnesota, stream discharge resulting from the deluge was the highest ever seen during an autumn flood (Minnesota Climatology Working Group, 2010). June 2014 was the wettest month on record in Minnesota, with a state -averaged rainfall of 8.03 inches. This broke the previous record of 7.32 inches, which occurred in both July 1897 and June 1914. Rainfall totals for much of the state ranked above the 95th percentile when compared with the historical record; in some cases the totals tripled that of the historical rainfall average for June. Scott County received between 10-12 inches of rain during June 2014 (MN DNR, 2014). A presidential disaster declaration was declared due to the severe storms, winds, flooding, landslides, and mudslides (DR -4182), which included 37 Minnesota counties and 3 Indian Reservations. Plans and Programs in Place Public Warning and Notification - In the event of emergencies or hazardous conditions that require timely and targeted communication to the public, Scott County utilizes the CodeRED Mass Notification System. Watershed Management Organizations - Each Watershed Management Organization in the county has some type of technical assistance and cost share/incentive program that provides assistance to landowners for managing conservation issues (including controlling or fixing erosion, practices that moderate runoff, or practices that build resiliency) on private lands. These programs provide ways to fix things and mitigate or increase resiliency on a small individual landowner scale. Local Water Management Plan - Each city in the county has a Local Water Management Plan and the county has one for unincorporated areas. There are also 4 Water Management Organizations with jurisdiction over different parts of the County. Each has a state -approved Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. No -Wake Ordinance - Scott County has a no -wake ordinance for Prior Lake and McMahon Lake to protect shorelines during high-water periods. Floodplain Ordinance - Scott County maintains a floodplain ordinance. Storm water Ordinance - Scott County maintains a stormwater ordinance. School Closings - All school districts within Scott County have a school closing policy and communications plan in place if inclement weather or temperatures create a hazardous situation for students or staff. Blakeley Township - The township supports Scott County's erosion control and natural resource protection. The township also supports removing homes in the floodplain and the avoidance of building homes on bluffs, and has engaged in several rip rap projects. 4.4.3 Severe Winter Storms - Blizzards, Ice Storms 571 241 Blizzards are storms that contain heavy snowfall, strong winds, and cold temperatures. The combination of these elements creates blinding snow with near zero visibility, deep snowdrifts, and life -threatening wind chill temperatures. Blizzards are the most dramatic and destructive of all winter storms that occur within Scott County, and are generally characterized as storms bearing large amounts of snow accompanied by strong winds. They have the ability to completely immobilize travel in large areas and can be life -threatening to humans and animals in their path. According to the National Weather Service (NWS), there is no fixed temperature requirement for blizzard conditions, but the life -threatening nature of low temperatures in combination with blowing snow and poor visibility increases dramatically when temperatures fall below 20° F. Blizzards typically occur between October and April; however, they occur most frequently from early November to late March. Figure 22. Armistice Day Blizzard, 1940 iy , '' ' "�" The greatest numbers of blizzards historically have occurred in the months of January, followed by March and November, respectively. Scott County, along with all areas of Minnesota, is susceptible to blizzards. Damages from blizzards can range from human and livestock deaths to significant snow removal costs. Stranded drivers can make uninformed decisions, such as leaving the car to walk in conditions that put them at risk. Because of the blinding potential of heavy snowstorms, drivers are also at risk of collisions with snowplows or other road traffic. Drivers and homeowners without emergency plans and kits are vulnerable to the life - threatening effects of heavy snow storms such as power outages, cold weather, and inability to travel, communicate, obtain goods or reach their destinations. Heavy snow loads can cause structural damage, particularly in areas where there are no building codes or where residents live in manufactured home parks. The frequency of structural fires tends to increase during heavy snow events, primarily due to utility disruptions and the use of alternative heating methods by residents. Between the years of 1975 and 1991, there were 49 deaths associated with blizzards statewide, or an average of 3 deaths per year. Deaths attributable to blizzards have dropped in recent years, primarily due to increased weather awareness and warning capabilities across the state. The economic costs of winter storms are generally not recorded by the NCEI; however, a winter storm in November 2001 resulted in property damage of $500,000. Ice storms are described as occasions when damaging accumulations of ice occur due to freezing rain. The terms freezing rain and freezing drizzle warn the public that a coating of ice is expected on the ground and other exposed surfaces. Heavy accumulations of ice can bring down trees, electrical wires, telephone poles and lines, and communication towers. AIN Communications and power can be disrupted for days while utility companies work to repair extensive damage. Ice forming on exposed objects generally ranges from a thin glaze to coatings 581 242 more than 1 inch thick. Even small accumulations of ice on sidewalks, streets, and highways may cause extreme hazards to Scott County motorists and pedestrians. Sleet does not stick to trees and wires, but sleet of sufficient thickness does cause hazardous driving conditions. Heavy sleet is a relatively rare occurrence, defined as an accumulation of ice pellets covering the ground to a depth of 1/2 -inch or more. Ice and sleet storms typically occur from October through April. The NWS notes that over 85% of ice storm -related deaths are the result of traffic accidents. According to the NCEI, 2 ice storms occurred in the county in 1996 and 1 in 1998, but no deaths or injuries were reported. Observing winter storm watches and warnings and adequate preparation can lessen the impact of blizzard events in Minnesota. Technical advances made in transportation, including safer vehicles and improved construction and maintenance of roads, have also contributed to the decline in deaths related to blizzards. Historical estimates of dollar losses associated with blizzards were not available for the purposes of this analysis. However, costs incurred by state and local government for snow removal associated with disaster declaration DR -1158 (January 1997) totaled over $27,300,000 dollars. Blizzards rank 9th out of the 10 natural hazards economically impacting Minnesota according to the statewide risk analysis. The chance that another winter storm affecting Scott County will occur is highly probable. Severe Winter Storm History in Scott County The total of notable events defined as heavy snows, blizzards, winter weather, ice storms and winter storms in Scott County recorded by the NCEI for the period from 2015 to September 2025 is 41. An overview of some historic winter storm events can be found in Table 25 below. Table 25. Notable Winter Weather Events in Scott County Date Type Cost Deaths Injuries Description 4/10/2019 Winter Storm 0 0 Several waves of precipitation occurred across the county with heavy snow at the start, with a mixture of sleet and snow during the during the overnight hours, before transitioning to mainly light snow & drizzle Wednesday evening and Thursday. Snowfall totals averaged 9 to 12 inches across the county. 2/24/2019 Blizzard 0 0 0 A powerful storm system brought blizzard conditions to a wide area of southern and central Minnesota, as well as adjacent west central Wisconsin. The heaviest snowfall occurred from south of Blue Earth (Faribault County) to Faribault and Hastings in Minnesota, and to River Falls and Rice Lake in Wisconsin. These areas received between 6-12 inches of snow with localized areas of 12+ inches. Snow drifts, some reported in excess of 20 feet, closed many roads in south central Minnesota for days and left numerous people requiring shelter. 59 IPage 243 4/14/2018 Blizzard 0 0 0 This prolonged snow storm event began April 13th and lasted until April 15th. The event was split into several precipitation hazards, which created multiple concerns. The Twin Cities had gusts between 40 to 50mph creating surface visibility of less than a few hundred feet. 15.8 inches of snow was reported at the Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport. This was the heaviest April snowstorm on record. 12/2012 Winter Storm 0 0 0 Snow developed across the county on December 8th. The snow became heavier toward morning, with heavier bands of snow between 8 am and 3 pm. By early evening, totals ranged from 10 to 14 inches across the county. 12/2010 Blizzard 0 0 0 Snowfall amounts averaged 18 inches across the county, along with whiteout conditions in the southern part which caused plows to be pulled off the road for several hours. 12/2009 Blizzard 0 0 0 The local county highway department reported white -out conditions for several hours across Scott County. Wind speeds increased to 25-35 mph, with gusts of 40 mph. This created blizzard conditions that continued until winds subsided during the early afternoon. Total snowfall amounts ranged from 5 to 7 inches across the county. Severe Winter Storms and Climate Change Historically, winter storms have had a large impact on public safety in Minnesota. This will continue, with a possible increase in snowstorm frequency and annual total snowfall. Winter weather is often a cause of power outages. Pressures on energy use, reduced reliability of services, potential outages and the potential rise in household costs for energy are major climate change risks to public health. According to the 2015 Minnesota Weather Almanac, a recent study of seasonal snowfall records across the state from 1890-2000 showed that 41 of 46 climate stations recorded an increase in average annual snowfall, by as much as 10 inches. Higher snowfall levels can result in greater runoff potential during spring snow melt, and many watersheds in Minnesota have shown more consistent measures of highvolume flows during spring, often at or above flood stage (Minnesota Department of Health, 2018). Vulnerability The number of heavy snowfall years for the Midwest has fluctuated between 1900 and 2006. The periods of 1900-1920 and 1960-1985 had numerous years with snowfall totals over the 90th percentile. In the past 3 decades, the number of heavy seasonal snowfall totals has been much lower. Despite these generally lower seasonal snowfall totals, some areas of the Midwest have still experienced significant snow totals in the most recent decade. The 100 -year linear trends based on 60 IPage 244 decadal values show that the upper Midwest had statistically significant (1% level) upward linear trends in snowstorm frequency from 1901 to 2000 (Kunkel, et al., 2013). Winter storms affect Scott County each year, so there is a 100% probability that the county and its jurisdictions will be affected annually. The amount of snow and ice, number of blizzard conditions, and days of sub -zero temperatures each year are unpredictable and within Scott County the vulnerability of jurisdictions to winter storms does not vary geographically. Citizens living in climates such as these must always be prepared for situations that put their lives or property at risk. It is not always the size of the storm or the depth of the cold, but an unprepared individual with a vehicle breakdown or unmaintained garage that are at risk. Rural citizens are more vulnerable to issues with deep snow. The vulnerability of each jurisdiction to severe winter storms has not changed due to any development in the last 5 years. Severe Winter Storms and Electrical Outages The leading cause of electric outages in Minnesota during 2008 to 2013 was Weather/Falling Trees. Between 2008 and 2013, the greatest number of electric outages in Minnesota occurred during the month of March (U.S. Department of Energy, 2016). Plans and Programs in Place Public Warning and Notification - In the event of emergencies or hazardous conditions that require timely and targeted communication to the public, Scott County utilizes the CodeRED Mass Notification System. School Closings - All school districts within Scott County have a school closing policy and communications plan in place if inclement weather or temperatures create a hazardous situation for students or staff. Winter Hazard Awareness Week - Scott County helps promote and participates in the National Weather Service's "Winter Hazard Awareness Week" held in November each year. The event seeks to educate residents on the dangers of winter weather and how to properly deal with it. Warning Sirens - Scott County has several warning sirens. 4.4.4 Extreme Cold Winter in Scott County can be a brutal time, and especially dangerous for disabled citizens and outdoor workers. Record temperature lows and arctic -like wind chills can cause cold -related illnesses such as frostbite and hypothermia, which can be deadly. Hypothermia is the greatest and most life -threatening cold weather danger. In Scott County cold winter weather can have severe or fatal impacts. Hypothermia occurs when the core body temperature drops below 96° F. Anyone who is exposed to severe cold without enough protection can develop hypothermia. Frostbite occurs when skin tissue and blood vessels are damaged from exposure to temperatures below 32° F. It most commonly affects the toes, fingers, earlobes, chin, cheeks, nose, and other body parts that are often left uncovered in cold temperatures. The NWS issues "Extreme cold" warnings when it feels like -30° F or colder across a 61 page 245 wide area for several hours. Extreme cold watches are issued a day or two before the conditions are expected. Medical costs related to extreme heat and cold can be enormous: in 2005 the total was $1.5 billion nationwide, or more than $16,000 per patient (Union of Concerned Scientists, 2009). Below zero temperatures occur almost every winter in Minnesota for a period of time. January is the coldest month, with daytime highs averaging 20° F and nighttime lows averaging 2° F. However, these averages do not tell the whole story. Maximum temperatures in January have been as high as 61° F and minimums as low as 36° F below zero. Extreme cold temperatures affect the county nearly every year. Extremely cold air settled over Minnesota on January 31st of 1996, and remained entrenched through February 4th. A new record low temperature for Minnesota was set in the town of Tower on February 2, 1996, at -60° F. Numerous record low temperatures were set during the period at St. Cloud, Rochester and the Twin Cities. Minneapolis/St. Paul set 3 new record low temperatures as well as recording the 2nd coldest day on record on February 2, 1996. A mean temperature of -25° F was measured that day with a high of -17° F and a low of -32° F in the Twin Cities. This was within 2 degrees of tying the all-time record low temperature set in the Twin Cities and the coldest temperature recorded this century. Many central and southern Minnesota locations set new record low temperatures the morning of the 2nd. The governor closed all schools that day. In February of 2014, nearly all of Minnesota was between 10-15° F colder than normal (1981-2010 period) (High Plains Regional Climate Center, 2014). The winter of 2013-2014 was the sixth coldest on record in Minnesota (The Weather Channel, 2014), with schools in the Twin Cities canceling 5 times in January due to dangerous wind chills. It was the coldest winter in the Twin Cities in 35 years, with an average temperature for December -February of 9.7° F (MN DNR, 2014). Many areas in the state also experienced higher than average precipitation through the winter and spring months. Extreme Cold History in Scott County January is the coldest month on average in Shakopee. The lowest temperature ever recorded there occurred in 1951, when it fell to -43° F (Intellicast, 2019). According to the High Plains Regional Climate Center, the average minimum temperature in Jordan (from 1942 -March 2013) for the month of January is 3° F, with an average annual snowfall of 30" (High Plains Regional Climate Center, 2013). The National Centers for Environmental Information(NCEI) recorded 3 extreme cold/wind chill events during the winter of 2013-2014. No deaths or injuries were reported. Extreme Cold and Climate Change There is not yet any observable trend related to extreme cold events and climate change in Minnesota. Cold temperatures have always been a part of Minnesota's climate and extreme cold events will continue. However, an increase in extreme precipitation or storm events such as ice storms as the climate changes could lead to a higher risk of residents being exposed to cold temperatures during power outages or other storm -related hazards during extreme cold. 62 IPage 246 Vulnerability Extreme cold temperatures affect the county nearly every year. The amount of snow and ice, number of blizzard conditions, and days of sub -zero temperatures each year are unpredictable Within Scott County the risk of extreme cold does not vary geographically. Citizens living in climates such as these must always be prepared for situations that put their lives or property at risk. It is not always the depth of the cold, but an unprepared individual with a vehicle breakdown or unmaintained garage that are at risk. Rural citizens not connected to city gas lines are more vulnerable to issues with extreme cold. The vulnerability of each jurisdiction to extreme cold has not changed due to any development in the last 5 years. Plans and Programs in Place Public Warning and Notification - In the event of emergencies or hazardous conditions that require timely and targeted communication to the public, Scott County utilizes the CodeRED Mass Notification System. School Closings - All school districts within Scott County have a school closing policy and communications plan in place if inclement weather or temperatures create a hazardous situation for students or staff. 4.4.5 Extreme Heat Humans need to maintain a constant body temperature if they are to stay healthy. Working in high temperatures induces heat stress when more heat is absorbed into the body than can be dissipated out. Heat illness such as prickly heat, fainting from heat exhaustion, or heat cramps are visible signs that people are working in unbearable heat. In the most severe cases, the body temperature control system breaks down altogether and body temperature rises rapidly. This is a heat stroke, which can be fatal. The NWS issues a heat advisory when, during a 24 -hour period, the temperature ranges from 105° F to 114° F during the day, and remains at or above 80° F at night. Extreme heat events are linked to a range of illnesses, even death, and can exacerbate pre-existing chronic conditions such as cardiovascular, respiratory, liver, and neurological diseases, endocrine disorders, and renal disease or failure. Populations who are most vulnerable to extreme heat include persons over 65 or under 5 years old; living alone, without air-conditioning, or residing on the topmost floor of a building; and with an income at or below the poverty line. People who are exposed to heat because of recreational activities or job -related activities also are more vulnerable, including athletes, construction workers, and landscape/agricultural workers (Adapting to Climate Change in Minnesota: 2013 Report of the Interagency Climate Adaptation Team, 2013). Medical costs related to extreme heat and cold can be enormous: in 2005 the total was $1.5 billion nationwide, or more than $16,000 per patient (Union of Concerned Scientists, 2009). Extreme Heat History in Scott County July is the hottest month on average in Shakopee. The highest temperature ever recorded there occurred in 1988, when it rose to 107° F (Intellicast, 2019). According to the High Plains Regional 63 IPage 247 Climate Center, the average July maximum temperature (from 1942 -March 2013) in Jordan was 82°F (High Plains Regional Climate Center, 2013). The National Center for Environmental Information has recorded 8 instances of extreme heat in Scott County between 1950 and 2025. No deaths or injuries were reported. Extreme Heat and Climate Change Minnesota's average temperature has increased about 3°F since recordkeeping began in 1895, with increased warming happening in recent decades (International Climate Adaptation Team, 2013). Annual temperatures in the Midwest have generally been well above the 1901-1960 average since the late 1990s, with the decade of the 2000s being the warmest on record (Kunkel, et al., 2013). 7 of Minnesota's 10 warmest years occurred in the last 15 years. Projected increases are 2° F to 6° F more by 2050 and 5° F to 10° F by 2100 (MN Environmental Quality Board, 2014). The Midwest has experienced major heat waves and their frequency has increased over the last 6 decades (Perera, et al., 2012). For the U.S., mortality increases 4% during heat waves compared with non -heat wave days (Anderson & Bell, 2011). During July 2011, 132 million people across the U.S. were under a heat alert - and on July 20 the majority of the Midwest experienced temperatures in excess of 100° F. Heat stress is projected to increase as a result of climbing summer temperatures and humidity (Schoof, 2012). On July 19, 2011, Moorhead Minnesota set a new state record for the hottest heat index ever, at 134° F. That same day, Moorhead also recorded a new state record for the highest dew point at 88. It was the hottest, most humid spot on the planet that day (Douglas, 2011). Recent statistics from NOAA show that there are more human fatalities each year due to heat waves than from floods, lightning, tornadoes and winter storms. Many cities have responded by creating Heat Wave Response Plans to ensure that those in marginal health without air conditioning can obtain the relief and care they need, and the Minnesota Department of Health developed the Extreme Heat Toolkit to help educate at -risk populations on how to reduce risks associated with heat waves (Minnesota Department of Health, 2018). Increasing temperatures impacts Minnesota's agricultural industry. Agriculture is highly dependent on specific climate conditions. As a result of increasing temperature, crop production areas may shift to new regions of the state where the temperature range for growth and yield of those crops is optimal. According to the National Climate Assessment, the Midwest growing season has lengthened by almost 2 weeks since 1950 due in large part to earlier timing of the last spring freeze. This trend is expected to continue. While a longer growing season may increase total crop production, other climate changes, such as increased crop losses and soil erosion from more frequent and intense storms, and increases in pests and invasive species, could outweigh this benefit. There may also be higher livestock losses during periods of extreme heat and humidity. Losses of livestock from extreme heat lead to a challenge in the disposal of animal carcasses. Currently there are only 2 rendering facilities in Minnesota available for livestock disposal. If a rendering facility is not available, lost livestock must be composted on an impervious surface. If losses are high, finding an impervious surface large enough is a challenge. In an attempt to adapt to increased temperatures, livestock areas in Minnesota may shift farther north. As a result of new livestock areas and the resulting manure production, farmers may transition to manure -based fertilizer applications in areas where traditionally only commercial fertilizers have been used, with 64 IPage 248 accompanying environmental advantages and disadvantages (Adapting to Climate Change in Minnesota: 2013 Report of the Interagency Climate Adaptation Team, 2013). In order to minimize the detrimental effects of heat stress on animal metabolism and weight gain, Minnesota farmers have also begun redesigning and retrofitting dairy, hog, and poultry barns with better watering, feeding, and ventilation systems (Minnesota Department of Health, 2018). Vulnerability There is a Likely risk of an Extreme Heath event in Scott County. Within Scott County the risk of extreme heat does not vary geographically. The vulnerability of each jurisdiction to extreme heat has not changed due to any development in the last 5 years. Plans and Programs in Place Public Warning and Notification - - In the event of emergencies or hazardous conditions that require timely and targeted communication to the public, Scott County utilizes the CodeRED Mass Notification System, Scott County Sheriff's Office social media, and local news media. Scott County promotes the use of NOAA weather radios by critical facilities and the public to receive information broadcast from the National Weather Service. Local newspapers and radio stations assist with sharing public information. School Closings - All school districts within Scott County have a school closing policy and communications plan in place if inclement weather or temperatures create a hazardous situation for students or staff. Mass Care Shelter Facilities - A period of extreme heat coupled with a major power outage may require emergency sheltering for those in need. Scott County has designated shelter facilities that have agreements with the Red Cross. Severe Weather Awareness Week - Scott County helps promote and participates in the National Weather Service's "Severe Weather Awareness Week" held in April each year. The event seeks to educate residents on the dangers of severe summer storms and highlights the importance of preparing for severe weather before it strikes. 4.4.6 Drought A drought refers to an extended period of deficient rainfall relative to the statistical mean for a region. Drought can be defined according to meteorological, hydrological, socioeconomic, and agricultural criteria. Meteorological drought is qualified by any significant deficit of precipitation. Hydrological drought is manifest in noticeably reduced river and stream flow and critically low groundwater tables. The term agricultural drought indicates an extended dry period that results in crop stress and harvest reduction. Socioeconomic drought refers to the situation that occurs when water shortages begin to affect people and their lives. It associates economic goods with the elements of meteorological, agricultural, and hydrological drought. Many supplies of economic goods (e.g., water, food grains, hydroelectric power) are greatly dependent on the weather. Due to natural variations in climate, water supplies are high in some years but low in others. Fluctuating long-term climate variations make drought difficult to predict. Drought History in Scott County 65IPage 249 The National Centers for Environmental Information records show no droughts in Scott County. However, between 1974 and 1977 dry conditions caused low water levels in wells and record -low stream flows throughout the state. Late summer forest fires broke out and conflicts arose between domestic well owners and neighboring high capacity well owners. During the drought of 1987-1989 most crops were lost. The drought affected power production, the forest products industry, public water supplies and fish & wildlife. For a 3 -month period from mid -July through mid -October 2003, a persistent weather pattern resulted in extremely dry weather across Scott County. Precipitation totals were less than 6 inches. Rainfall totals ranked among the lowest on record for many areas of south-central and southeastern Minnesota, and a small portion of west -central Minnesota. Scott County was included in the 2003 U.S. Department of Agriculture designation of 62 counties in Minnesota as primary agricultural disaster areas due to drought. The hazard rank for drought in Scott County is medium. A drought may not have a severe impact on human life due to decreased water access; however the economic impact on farmers would be significant A drought would also have a detrimental impact on the local economy due to stunting growth of agriculture crops and negative impacts on livestock. Extended drought conditions may also make an area more prone to wildfire. Droughts can also be closely linked with insect infestation (grasshoppers were well known during the 1988 drought). Trees may be lost due to lack of moisture. In severe instances, a drought may cause wells to dry up entirely. Although Scott County has not been impacted by drought in recent history, the county is still susceptible to drought. According to the Palmer Drought Severity Index, Minnesota has been struck by at least 5 serious periods of drought in the last 100 years. During the period between 1920 and 2020, Minnesota experienced 27 months which had a departure from mean value of -6.0 or lower. Total Percent Land Area 100% - 80%- 60% - 40%- 20% - 0%- 20% - 40% - 60% - 80%- 100% ,1opO i 10° 10, Z> , ti i f .041 ,�° 10," yo ' o h 4• 1/44tie No V N do N Figure 23. Minnesota Palmer Drought Severity Index- Departure from mean 1895-2025 tiro ry�h tie ti°,y ti°•lo ti61, While Scott County has not experienced a significant drought since 1988, droughts in our county can occur at any time and cause widespread damage, with an exceptionally strong impact on our agricultural economy. In the event of a drought, there would be no area of the county that would 66 IPage 250 not be impacted in some way, and a severe drought could lead to response measures which may involve the entire community such as water restrictions. Drought and Climate Change Droughts have been happening throughout Minnesota's history and it is not yet clear how climate change may impact this (International Climate Adaptation Team, 2013). While there was no apparent change in drought duration in the Midwest over the past century (Dai, 2011), the average number of days without precipitation is projected to increase in the future (Gensini & Mote, Estimations of Hazardous Convective Weather in the United States Using Dynamical Downscaling, 2014). Even in areas where precipitation does not decrease, projected higher air temperatures will cause increased surface evaporation and plant water loss, leading to drier soils. As soil dries out, a larger proportion of the incoming heat from the sun goes into heating the soil and adjacent air rather than evaporating its moisture, resulting in hotter summers under drier climatic conditions (Mueller & Seneviratne, 2012). Across the nation, drought is affecting water supplies, as ground and surface water levels are increasingly reduced due to growing consumption and withdrawal. These trends are expected to continue, with a higher likelihood of water shortages (Georgakakos, et al., 2014). In 2007, 24 Minnesota counties received drought designation, while 7 counties were declared flood disasters. In 2012, 55 Minnesota counties received federal drought designation at the same time 11 counties declared flood emergencies (MN Environmental Quality Board, 2014). As of May 2015, over 90% of Minnesota was undergoing severe or moderate drought, due to low snow levels during the 2014-2015 winter and dry spring weather, with precipitation deficits totaling 3-6 inches below average across much of the state since October 2014. Water levels on streams, lakes, and wetlands were below average, and wildfires were common during April of 2015. Blowing soil was also reported due to high winds and the dried -out landscape (MN DNR, 2015). Vulnerability Scott County has identified Droughts as being a possible risk in our area. Jurisdictions in Scott County do not vary in their vulnerability to drought The vulnerability of each jurisdiction to drought has not changed due to any development in the last 5 years. Plans and Programs in Place Watershed Management Organizations - Each Watershed Management Organization in the county has some type of technical assistance and cost share/incentive program that provides assistance to landowners for managing conservation issues (including controlling or fixing erosion, practices that moderate runoff, or practices that build resiliency) on private lands. These programs provide ways to fix things and mitigate or increase resiliency on a small, individual landowner scale. Local Water Management Plan - Each city in the county has a Local Water Management Plan and the county has one for unincorporated areas. There are also 4 Water Management Organizations 67 IPage 251 with jurisdiction over different parts of the County. Each has a state -approved Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. City Water Supply Plans (water restrictions) - All cities within Scott County maintain a water supply plan that abides by DNR and Met Council guidelines. These plans are updated every 10 years. The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) 2013 Draft Strategic Plan for the Groundwater Management Program states the DNR's role in groundwater use is, "through its permit programs, information collection and analysis activities, law enforcement responsibilities, education, and technical assistance opportunities." Goals, objectives, and strategies of the plan focus on effective management and enforcement of groundwater appropriations permitting, encouragement of conservation practices for permitted users and the general public, developing and improving groundwater data resources like the Geologic Atlas and monitoring networks, and addressing groundwater management in areas of high use and/or limited supply. The Metropolitan Council's 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan, one of the agency's legislatively mandated system plans, states the agency's "roles and responsibilities... provide a unique regional perspective for planning and management, all aimed at protecting our region's valuable water resources." The plan also states, "The Council provides wastewater services to municipal and industrial customers..., [and] promotes sustainable water resources through its planning and technical assistance for surface water and water supply." According to the Metropolitan Council's website, the Master Water Supply Plan, adopted in September 2015, is an extension of the Water Resources Policy Plan that "provides a framework for sustainable long-term water supply planning at the local and regional level." Through the Metro Water Model, the plan identifies that Twin Cities Metro Region groundwater resources are limited, and sets goals to manage this resource to ensure reliable and secure water supplies. Importantly, the plan recognizes local control and responsibility for owning, maintaining, and operating water systems. MN Drought Response Plan - The State of Minnesota has a statewide drought response plan in place. The plan was prepared by the Minnesota DNR. Program Gaps and Deficiencies Water Conservation Provisions/Use Restrictions - Water conservation provisions and use restrictions in times of drought are not included in county ordinances. 4.4.7 Wildfire A wildfire is an uncontrolled fire spreading through vegetative fuels, posing danger and destruction to property. Wildfires can occur in undeveloped areas and spread to urban areas where structures and other human developments are more concentrated. While some wildfires start by natural causes like lightning, humans cause 4 out of every 5 wildfires. Debris burns, arson or carelessness are the leading causes of wildfires. As a natural hazard, a wildfire is often the direct result of a lightning strike that may destroy personal property and public land areas, especially on national and state forest lands. The dangers from wildfire include the destruction of timber, property and 68 IPage 252 wildlife, and injury or loss of life to people living in the affected area or using the area for recreational facilities. While wildfires are often viewed in a negative light, they are a naturally occurring part of the environment. Wildfires are an important component of healthy forest and prairie ecology, and can be beneficial by reducing dangerously high fuel levels and putting nutrients into the ground that spur new growth. In addition, many flora species require fire for seed germination. However, as people settled this country and began clearing land and building homes, roads, railroads, and campgrounds, new artificial causes of wildfire emerge and their frequency and level of destruction increased. Causes of wildfires vary from state to state. For example, in Florida, lightning ignites approximately half of all wildfires, while in Minnesota lightning causes less than 5% of all wildfires. These variations are due to climate, vegetation, topography, and weather. People burning debris cause most wildfires in Minnesota. However, wildfires are also caused by vehicle exhaust, sparks from trains and heavy equipment, camping, smoking, and lightning. Topography affects the movement of air and fire over the ground surface. The slope and shape of terrain can change the rate of speed at which the fire travels. Weather affects the probability of wildfire and has a significant effect on its behavior. Temperature, humidity and wind affect the severity and duration of wildfires. Homes threatened by wildfire are primarily those located in the "wildland-urban interface." This is the zone where homes and subdivisions have been located in wildland areas where natural wildfires can have an impact. While wildfires are necessary for healthy ecosystems, they burn whatever fuel is in their path, whether vegetation or buildings. One of the most common causes of a home being damaged or destroyed is due to radiant heat. In a wildfire, radiant heat is the heat given off by burning vegetation. The high temperatures of some wildfires can cause the deck, siding, or roof of a home to ignite, because the fire was too near the home. Studies in western wildfires have shown that approximately 85% of homes surviving a major wildfire had 30-50 feet of defensible space around them, coupled with fire-resistant roofing. Approximately 1,600 wildfires occurred each year in Minnesota on average from 1976-2011 (MN DNR, 2011). Wildfires occur throughout the spring, summer and fall, however, most wildfires in Minnesota take place in March, April, and May. During this period, much of the existing vegetation has been killed due to winter temperatures and is dead, brown and combustible. Also, there is little green vegetation to serve as a barrier for a moving wildfire. Wildfire History in Scott County Wildfire has been ranked as a possible risk by Scott County. Their occurrence is uncommon in the county, and though brush fires occur occasionally, they are also rare. The last wildfire in Scott County was in 2009. The Minnesota DNR responded to 12 wildfires in Scott County between 1985 and September 2025, all of which were human -caused, burning a total of 514 acres. These include fires not only on state lands, but also rural private lands for which there is not another agency with primary responsibility. Wildfires that are not included in this data are those that occur on federal and Native American lands, and those that are responded to by local fire departments. The largest 69 IPage 253 fire burned 144 acres between Savage and Shakopee in 2009. Its cause was the burning of piled debris. Another large wildfire occurred in April of 2000, when 140 acres burned west of Savage. The cause was incendiary/arson. These fires, along with areas of peat soil, are mapped in Figure. The DNR has not responded to any fires in Scott County since 2009. According to MN DNR data, there are 9,074 acres of peat in Scott County. Peat is partially decayed plant matter found in ancient bogs and swamps. Minnesota has approximately 6 million acres of peatland, the highest total acreage in the contiguous United States. Peat fires are deep-rooted fires that burn underground, lasting for weeks, months, or even years. They can smolder during winter months beneath the snow, surfacing again in the spring to burn above ground. Peat ignites when its moisture content is low, and then it supports combustion rather than flame. Once started, combustion is persistent because peat contains oxygen and needs little or no outside oxygen to continue burning. Peat's insulating qualities mean the fire loses little heat. As the peat dries, it becomes water repellent. These factors result in long-lasting fires that require extensive operations to extinguish. However, peat fires have not been an issue in Scott County. MN Geospatial Commons. MN DNR Figure 24. Wildfires by Acres Burned Where MNDNR are primary responding agency (1985 -April 2017) Wildfire and Climate Change Temperatures are predicted to rise in the state, which could lead to more extreme heat events and associated wildfire risks. As Minnesota's climate changes, weather fluctuations between drought and extreme rain events and increasing temperatures will result in changes to forest composition 70 IPage 254 and/or distribution. These fluctuations can lead to dry conditions that may cause increased fire risk in both grassland and forest environments. Vulnerability Scott County has identified wildfires as a possible risk in our area. Jurisdictions in Scott County do not vary in their vulnerability to wildfires. The vulnerability of each jurisdiction to wildfire has not changed due to any development in the last 5 years. Phenological green up is considered an important factor which impacts the trend of fire activity. The amount of green vegetation in Minnesota varies between thick, forested regions in most of the northeastern part of the state, to typically flat, grasslands in the rest of the state (National Interagency Fire Center: Eastern Area Coordinating Group, 2020). Scott County lies in a less -forested portion of the state, which lowers the risk of large wildfires, but this difference in vegetation does not eliminate the risk. Thick, forested areas do exist throughout Scott County, mainly near the Minnesota River and in the many bluffs and ravines in the county. The period when tree have no leaves, in the early spring and late fall is when the fire threat is highest. Once green up takes place, the wildfire hazard is reduced significantly due to reduced ignition potential and lowered spread rates. However, if a drought were to develop and extend through the summer, the threat for wildfire increases significantly. Plans and Programs in Place Public Warning and Notification - In the event of emergencies or hazardous conditions that require timely and targeted communication to the public, Scott County utilizes the CodeRED Mass Notification System. Scott County and the Scott County Sheriff's Office social media, IPAWS, and local news media. Local newspapers and radio stations assist with sharing public information. Fire Departments - There are 7 fire departments in Scott County, and the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community also provides fire services throughout the county as a mutual aid partner. Each department is responsible for wildfires within their department boundaries; however they often work together on larger fires, including wildfires. Mutual Aid Agreements - All of the municipal fire departments in Scott County have mutual aid agreements with each contiguous department that borders their respective fire districk. Written mutual aid agreements are on file with each city and with the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community. DNR Information and Training - DNR maintains current statewide map information on seasonal wildfire risks. Firefighters in Scott County are encouraged to participate in annual wildfire training classes offered by the DNR Forestry Department. The DNR also works with firefighters in promoting their Fire Smart Program, which is a fire prevention program involving local public schools. Burning Permits/Restrictions - For the residents living in unincorporated areas (townships), the MN Department of Natural Resources regulates when burning permits are available and requires permit holders to notify the county prior to burning. Permits in the cities of Belle Plaine, Elko New 71 page 255 Market, Jordan, New Prague, Prior Lake, Savage, and Shakopee are available through their municipality. If a burnban is in place, permits are cancelled, and new permits are not issued. Fire Prevention Week - Fire prevention is held annually each October. Most city fire departments participate and provide an opportunity for citizens to learn fire safety with open houses. In addition to fire departments going to schools to educate youth, local media also assists in sharing fire safety information to the public. Program Gaps or Deficiencies Wildfire Assessment - There has not been a recent countywide assessment of areas with significant wildfire potential, particularly those with proximity to urban areas. Dry Hydrants and Water Access - Not all areas of Scott County have good access to water resources for fighting fires. Fire districts need to continue addressing the need for dry hydrants and water access 4.4.8 Landslides and Soil Erosion Erosion is the wearing away of land, such as the loss of a riverbank, beach, shoreline, or dune material. It is measured as the rate of change in the position or displacement of a riverbank or shoreline over a period of time. Short-term erosion typically results from periodic natural events, such as flooding, hurricanes, storm surges, and windstorms, but may be intensified by human activities. Long-term erosion is a result of multi -year impacts such as repetitive flooding, wave action, sea level rise, sediment loss, subsidence, and climate change. Death and injury are not typically associated with erosion; however, it can destroy buildings and infrastructure (FEMA, 2013). The movement of a mass of rock, debris, or earth down a slope by the force of gravity is considered a landslide. They occur when the slope or soil stability changes from stable to unstable, which may be caused by earthquakes, storms, volcanic eruptions, erosion, fire, or additional human -induced activities. Slopes greater than 10 degrees are more likely to slide, as are slopes where the height from the top of the slope to its toe is greater than 40 feet. Slopes are also more likely to fail if vegetative cover is low and/or soil water content is high. Potential impacts include environmental disturbance, property and infrastructure damage, and injuries or fatalities (FEMA, 2013). Soil Erosion/Landslides History in Scott County Soil Erosion/ Landslides has been ranked as a possible risk by Scott County. Some mudslides occurred with the flooding in August 2007 in Scott County, when soils were saturated from prolonged and heavy rains. Storms in June 2014 resulted in landslides, washed out roads in Shakopee, Blakeley, Prior Lake and Belle Plaine, and record high levels on the Minnesota River (Belle Plaine Herald, 2015). Flooding also created farm field gullies, washed-out culverts, and stream bank erosion (Shakopee Valley News, 2015). A Presidential Disaster Declaration was declared (DR -4182) due to the landslides, mudslides, flooding, winds, and severe storms. 72 IPage 256 trees Figure 27. Mudslide in Blakeley (KSTP.com, 2014) The NCEI reported that mudslides and floodwaters cut off all access to the town of Blakeley (Figure 31). This included train tracks that impacted Union Pacific and Canadian Pacific rail operations. Highways 6, 41, and 101 were closed due to high water levels on the Minnesota River. The entire town of Blakeley was evacuated due to the high river levels. Getting in and out of town became nearly impossible due to fallen and damaged roads, and a seismic monitor device was installed to record ground movements (McDonough, 2014). One resident reported 5" of mud, and with electricity out pumping was not an option, as roads remained closed due to instability (Klein, 2014). Figure 28. Landslide Damage to a Historic Jordan Brewery (Feyder, 2014) In Jordan, a 150 -year -old brewery was severely damaged by a landslide during the summer of 2014 (Figure 32). According to one report, "Soaked by rain, a massive chunk of a hill tumbled into the brewery building, crashing through a back wall and filling a top -floor apartment with trees, rocks and mud." The building was on the National Register of Historic Places, and is located near downtown Jordan, which is also on the register. The cost of stabilizing the hillside was estimated at over $7.5 million, none of which is covered by insurance (Feyder, 2014). A member of the steering committee noted concern about landslides adjacent to the water tower in Jordan, which sits high atop a bluff on the southern side of the city, east of Hwy 21 and north of Sawmill Road (the same hill that damaged the brewery in 2014). A mitigation action to reinforce the water tower base was included in the 2013 FEMA Resilience Report for Scott County. The actions states that "The water tower base should be reinforced to prevent damage from erosion and flooding. The specific community funding source is unknown." According to former Jordan Police Chief Bob Malz, the bluff has been eroding towards the water tower for years and the bluff is falling into Sand Creek below (Figure 33). Though the water tower is not currently compromised, it is believed that eventually it may be an issue. The city of Jordan is currently having an engineering study done to look at the majority of the bluff including the water tower area, with the hopes of gaining a better understanding of the bluffs stability and what it would cost to stabilize it. Erosion on the bluff increased after the June 2014 rain/flood event. 73IPage 257 Figure 29. Jordan Water Tower and Eroding Bluff (imagery from 2019) Soil Erosion/Landslides and Climate Change The increased magnitude and frequency of flooding events and storm activity that may result from climate change may in turn increase the risk of soil erosion and landslides. According to University of Washington geologist Dave Montgomery, "If the climate changes in a way that we get a lot more rainfall you would expect to see a lot more landslides" (Phillips, 2014). In Minnesota, the wettest days are getting wetter. This can contribute to increased erosion in many locations due to flooding and saturation of soils. Reduced ice cover on lakes and shorelines (due to warmer temperatures) could potentially expose shorelines to increased erosion or damage during weather events when they previously may have been covered with ice (National Climate Assessment Development Advisory Committee, 2013). According to the 2014 National Climate Assessment, "Increased precipitation intensity also increases erosion, damaging ecosystems and increasing delivery of sediment and subsequent loss of reservoir storage capacity" (Pryor, et al., 2014). Vulnerability Soil Erosion/Landslides have been ranked as a possible risk by Scott County. The risk is highest in the bluff areas within the Minnesota River Valley, especially near Blakeley Township, Belle Plaine, Belle Plaine Township, St. Lawrence Township, Jordan, Sand Creek Township, and Louisville Township. In these locations, Soil Erosion/Landslides are considered a likely risk. As noted above, there has been concern regarding the stability of the hill on which the water tower sits in Jordan. Reinforcing the tower base was included as a mitigation action in the 2013 FEMA Resilience Report for Scott County. Erosion and sediment control is a high priority in Scott County. According to the 1996 National Water Quality Inventory, stormwater runoff is a leading source of water pollution. Harmful sediments containing pollutants are often carried to lakes, streams, and wetlands from construction sites. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates 20 to 150 tons of soil per acre lost yearly to storm water runoff from construction sites. 74 258 Studies indicate that by controlling erosion, sedimentation and other pollutants transported by runoff from construction sites can be controlled as well. The Scott County Soil and Water Conservation District aims to control soil erosion through maintaining and repairing topsoil. When a subdivision is developed in Scott County, massive re -grading of the land occurs, involving scraping away the existing topsoil. When topsoil is not replaced, what is left is the remaining subsoil that is often high clay content, creating an inability of new sod to be able to properly root. Hence, leading to increased stormwater runoff. The vulnerability of each jurisdiction to soil erosion and landslides has not changed due to any development in the last 5 years. Plans and Programs in Place Watershed Management Organizations - Each Watershed Management Organization in the county has some type of technical assistance and cost share/incentive program that provides assistance to landowners for managing conservation issues (including controlling or fixing erosion, practices that moderate runoff, or practices that build resiliency) on private lands. These programs provide ways to fix things and mitigate or increase resiliency on a small, individual landowner scale. Each of the 4 Water Management Organizations within Scott County have adopted by reference the erosion and sediment control design and operational standards as set forth in the national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) general permit. Through inspections the Scott County SWCD has contact with contractors, government units, and the MPCA and building inspectors regarding compliance with the standards. The following topics are addressed in county ordinances, which are designed to be consistent with the NPDES requirements. Implementation of the NPDES standards and permit requirements, coupled with education, offer communities an opportunity to create meaningful plans and rules to protect water resources in their jurisdictions. 1. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 2. Temporary Sediment Basins 3. Erosion Prevention Practices 4. Sediment Control Practices 5. Dewatering and Basin Draining 6. Inspections and Maintenance 7. Pollution Prevention Management Measures 8. Final Stabilization The Scott County Soil & Water Conservation District assists other watersheds with similar technical work and fieldwork Local Water Management Plan - Each city in the county has a Local Water Management Plan and the county has one for unincorporated areas. There are also 4 Water Management Organizations with jurisdiction over different parts of the County. Each has a state -approved Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. No -Wake Ordinance - Scott County has a no -wake ordinance for Prior Lake and McMahon Lake to protect shorelines during high-water periods. 75IPage 259 Floodplain Ordinance - Scott County maintains a floodplain ordinance. Storm water Ordinance - Scott County maintains a stormwater ordinance. Blakeley Township - The township supports Scott County's erosion control and natural resource protection. The township also supports removing homes in the floodplain and the avoidance of building homes on bluffs and has engaged in several rip rap projects. Program Gaps and Deficiencies No program gaps or deficiencies have been identified. 4.4.9 Structure Fires FEMA separates structure fires that are human -caused as a manmade hazard. An incendiary attack is the initiation of fire or explosion on or near a target via direct contact or remotely via projectile. The duration of the hazard is generally minutes to hours. The extent of damage is determined by the type and quantity of device/accelerant and materials present at or near the target. The effects of structural fires are generally static other than cascading consequences, incremental structural failure, etc. Mitigation factors include built-in fire detection and protection systems and fire - resistive construction techniques. Inadequate security can allow easy access to target, easy concealment of an incendiary device and undetected initiation of a fire. Non-compliance with fire and building codes as well as failure to maintain existing fire protection systems can substantially increase the effectiveness of a fire weapon. Vulnerability Jurisdictions in Scott County do not vary in their vulnerability to structure fires. The vulnerability of each jurisdiction to structure fires has not changed due to any development in the last five years. Plans and Programs in Place Emergency Operations Plan - Scott County maintains an Emergency Operations Plan which is designed as a guide for emergency operations. It is intended to assist key county/city officials and emergency organizations to carry out their responsibilities for the protection of life and property under a wide range of emergency conditions, including fires. All jurisdictions in Scott County are equally vulnerable to hazardous materials. The vulnerability of each jurisdiction to hazardous materials has not changed due to any development in the last 5 years Plans and Programs in Place Public Warning and Notification - In the event of emergencies or hazardous conditions that require timely and targeted communication to the public, Scott County utilizes the CodeRED Mass Notification System. Emergency Operations Plan - Scott County maintains an Emergency Operations Plan which is designed as a guide for emergency operations. It is intended to assist key county/city officials and emergency organizations to carry out their responsibilities for the protection of life and property under a wide range of emergency conditions, including hazardous materials emergency response. 76IPage 260 4.4.13 Terrorism Human -caused hazards are intentional, criminal, malicious uses of force and violence to perpetrate disasters against people or property. They can be the result of terrorism - actions intended to intimidate or coerce a government or the civilian population to further political or social objectives - which can be either domestic or international, depending on the origin, base and objectives of the terrorist organization. Terrorist acts may be perpetrated by individuals for personal reasons. Hazards can result from the use of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Examples of WMD that could be used include biological, chemical, nuclear and radiological weapons; arson, incendiary, explosive and armed attacks are also used in terrorist attacks. In addition, industrial sabotage, intentional hazardous material release, and cyber terrorism may be used. Cascading effects and risk of an intentional human -caused disaster are highly dependent on the specific mode of attack used and asset targeted. Many of these have been detailed in the technological hazards portion of the plan covering dam failure and hazardous materials incidents. Fires and secondary explosions are possible with explosive attacks and fires from arson attacks can extend beyond the intended target. Targets could also include any building or facility that is owned, operated, or utilized by any level of government, including local, county, state, or federal. Other significant areas that could be targeted include schools or other areas where large groups of people congregate. Terrorism History in Scott County There are no historic incidents of terrorism in Scott County. Vulnerability Jurisdictions in Scott County do not vary in their vulnerability to terrorism. The vulnerability of each jurisdiction to terrorism has not changed due to any development in the last 5 years. Plans and Programs in Place Public Warning and Notification - In the event of emergencies or hazardous conditions that require timely and targeted communication to the public, Scott County utilizes the CodeRED Mass Notification System. 4.4.4 Dam Failure Dams are structures that retain or detain water behind a large barrier. When full or partially full, the difference in elevation between the water above the dam and below creates large amounts of potential energy, allowing the chance for failure. Dams can fail due to either 1) water heights or flows above the capacity for which the structure was designed; or 2) deficiencies in the structure such that it cannot hold back the potential energy of the water. If a dam fails, issues of primary concern include loss of human life/injury, downstream property damage, lifeline disruption (transportation routes and utility lines required to maintain or protect life), and environmental damage. Dams require constant monitoring and regular maintenance to ensure their integrity. Dam Failure History in Scott County 77Ipage 261 There has been no occurrences of dam failure in Scott County's history. Scott County has no dams that pose a high hazard potential. Scott County has ranked the risk of Dam Failures within the county as possible. Table 28 below summarizes data on Scott County's 22 dams based on data from the National Inventory of Dams. They are also mapped in Figure 36. The only dam with an Emergency Action Plan is Sunset Lake. There are levees along the Minnesota River that protect the cities of Savage, Shakopee, Belle Plaine and rural areas in Scott County. A levee has been constructed along a part of Sand Creek that protects the city of Jordan from flooding. The levee system is about 8 miles long with a top elevation of 1,460 feet above mean sea level. No levees within Scott County have ever failed. **Denotes EAP required Name Owner River Primary Purpose Year Built NID Height Hazard Level Dam Type Ames Ames, Richard Sand Creek NA 1996 NA Low NA Cedar Lake Diversion Hendricks Sand Creek Recreation NA 1 Low NA Cedar Lake Inlet Scott County Sand Creek NA NA NA Low NA Cedar Lake Outlet MN DNR Sand Creek - Tributary Other 1950 13 Low Gravity Cynthia Lake MN DNR Porter Creek NA NA 2 Low NA Deboom NA Minnesota River - Tributary NA NA NA Low NA Dvorak F Pond Dvorak, Anton Sand Creek - Offstream Tributary Other 1968 9 Low Earth Henry Pond Henry, Wallace Vermillion River - Tributary Recreation 1976 15 Low Earth Hilgenberg Pond Hilgenberg, Wally Minnesota River - Tributary Recreation 1976 26 Significant Earth Jeffers Fish Pond Jeffers, Robert Pikes Lake - Tributary Fish & Wildlife Pond 1970 15 Low Earth Jeffers Upper Dam Jeffers, Robert Pikes Lake - Tributary Fish & Wildlife Pond 1981 10 Low Earth Jeffers Wildlife Pond Jeffers, Robert Pikes Lake - Tributary Fish & Wildlife Pond 1971 8 Low Earth 78 IPage 262 Jordan Falls City of Jordan Sand Creek NA 1860 28 Low NA Jordan Mill City of Pond Jordan Sand Creek Recreation NA 28 Significant Gravity Maxa Pond Maza, Steve Vermillion River - Tributary Recreation 1978 17 Low Earth Pettit F Pond Petit, Duane Vermillion River - Offstream Tributary Other 1970 8 Low Earth Pleasant Lake Diversion MN DNR Sand Creek NA NA 6 Low NA Prior Lake MN DNR NA NA NA 12 Low Gravity/ Concrete Ruehlings Pond Ruehling, Earl Minnesota River - Tributary Fire Protection, Stock, Small Fish Pond 1962 25 Low Earth City of Sunset Lake** Burnsville Minnesota River - Tributary Flood Control 1983 21 High Earth Theis-Bendzick Pond Benzick, Gerald Sand Creek - Tributary Fish & Wildlife Pond 1976 47 Low Earth Vallez Fish Pond Vallez, James Sand Creek - Tributary Fire Protection, Stock, Small Fish Pond 1968 21 Low Earth **Sunset Lake Dam, which is located in Dakota County, is required to have an Emergency Action Plan (EAP) Table 26. Darn Data for Scott County 79IPage 263 Jordan Falls Rued. mgr Nrd MNDNR, MN Geospatial Commons Belle Plaine Figure 32. Dams in Scott County Prior Lake �'fi°` �" 7Moseendndr l: -r Valle, Fie'•. Pord Pond Jordan Mill Pond Jordan Dam Failure and Climate Change Dams are designed based on assumptions about a river's annual flow behavior that will determine the volume of water behind the dam and flowing through the dam at any one time. Changes in weather patterns due to climate change may change the expected flow pattern. It is conceivable that bigger rainfalls at earlier times in the year could threaten a dam's designed margin of safety, causing dam operators to release greater volumes of water earlier in a storm cycle in order to maintain the required margins of safety. Such early releases of increased volumes can increase flood potential downstream. While climate change will not increase the probability of dam failure, it may increase the probability of design failures. Minnesota had a dam failure due to a large storm event in June 2012. The Forebay canal in Carlton County had operated as designed for nearly 100 years. The intensity of the 2012 rain event caused a failure of the canal wall which caused significant damage. Climate change is adding a new level of uncertainty that needs to be considered with respect to assumptions made during dam construction. Vulnerability 801 264 Dam failures have been ranked as a possible risk by Scott County. Areas most susceptible to the effects of dam failure are the populated places downstream from a dam location. The vulnerability of each jurisdiction to dam failure has not changed due to any development in the last 5 years. Plans and Programs in Place Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Dam Safety Program - For 30 years, the federal government has used the National Dam Safety Program (NDSP) to protect Americans from dam failure. The NDSP is a partnership of states, federal agencies, and other stakeholders that encourages individual and community responsibility for dam safety. The NDSP is intended to help states bring the necessary resources to bear on inspection, classification, and emergency planning for dam safety. National Inventory of Dams (NID) - The NID is a database managed by the Army Corps of Engineers, used to track information on the nation's water control infrastructure. Information from the NID is used in the development of water resource management, land use management, floodplain management, risk management, and emergency action planning. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Waters - Dam Safety Program - The MN DNR Dam Safety Program and current dam safety regulations require the safe design, construction, operation, and maintenance of dams in Minnesota. The state program includes review of design plans and plans for proposed dams, safety inspections of existing dams, and repair of dams. The Dam Safety Program keeps a file on all dams that are subject to state dam safety regulations or have had information or reports generated on them for another purpose. A typical file contains construction plans, photos, inspection reports, and correspondence. Public Warning and Notification - In the event of emergencies or hazardous conditions that require timely and targeted communication to the public, Scott County utilizes the CodeRED Mass Notification System. 81 page 265 Section 5 - Mitigation Strategy The purpose of mitigation is to protect lives and reduce the future impacts of hazards including property damage, disruption to local and regional economies, the amount of public and private funds spent to assist with recovery, and to build disaster -resistant communities. Mitigation actions and projects should be based on a well -constructed risk assessment, provided in Section 4 of this plan. Mitigation should be an ongoing process adapting over time to accommodate a community's needs. 5.1 Community Capability Assessment The capability assessment identifies current activities used to mitigate hazards. The capability assessment identifies the policies, regulations, procedures, programs, and projects that contribute to the lessening of disaster damages. The assessment also provides an evaluation of these capabilities to determine whether the activities can be improved in order to more effectively reduce the impact of future hazards. The following sections identify existing plans and mitigation capabilities within all of the communities. Appendix J lists the plans and programs in place in Scott County as related to hazard mitigation. 5.1.1 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) The NFIP is a federal program created by Congress to mitigate future flood losses nationwide through sound, community -enforced building and zoning ordinances and to provide access to affordable, federally -backed flood insurance protection for property owners. The NFIP is designed to provide an insurance alternative to disaster assistance to meet the escalating costs of repairing damage to buildings and their contents caused by floods. Participation in the NFIP is based on an agreement between local communities and the federal government that states that if a community will adopt and enforce a floodplain management ordinance to reduce future flood risks to new construction in Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs), the federal government will make flood insurance available within the community as a financial protection against flood losses. Following a damaging flood event, any impacted jurisdiction would work with the MN DNR to use a form to track cumulative improvements and repetitive losses in the floodplain. The affected jurisdiction would also review the Minnesota Post -Flood Substantial Damage Playbook for Local Officials. Minnesota Post -Flood Substantial Damage Playbook for Local Officials Table 27 below shows which jurisdictions in Scott County participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). 82 IPage 266 NFIP Participant Flood Hazard Boundary Map Identified Flood Insurance Rate Map Current map date NFIP Entr Belle Plaine YES 3/8/1974 12/18/1986 2/12/2021 12/18/1986 Credit River Elko NewMarket Jordan YES YES YES New Prague YES Prior Lake YES Savage YES Shakopee Scott County YES YES Not Listed in CSB 2/12/2021 Not Listed in CSB 3/8/1974 5/10/1974 7/26/1974 3/29/1974 6/7/1974 12/20/1974 2/12/2021 1/6/1982 11/1/1978 9/29/1978 6/18/1980 9/29/1978 4/11/1980 2/12/2021 2/12/2021 2/12/2021 8/19/2021 10/24/2014 1/6/1982 7/17/2024 11/1/1978 2/12/2021 9/29/1979 2/12/2021 6/18/1980 2/12/2021 9/29/1978 2/12/2021 4/3/1978 Jurisdiction NFIP/Floodplain Administrator Belle Plaine Cynthia Smith-Strack, Community Development Director Credit River Vanessa Strong, Scott WMO Water Resources Manager Elko New Market Renee Christianson, Community Development Senior Planner Jordan Sahni Moore, City Planner New Prague Kenneth Ondich, Community Development Director Prior Lake Stephanie Thulien, Stormwater Project Engineer Shakopee Michael Kerski, Director of Planning & Development Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community Bryan Gorman, Emergency Manager Savage Jesse Carlson, Water Resources Manager Scott County Vanessa Strong, Scott WMO Water Resources Manager Table 27. Description of NFIP Activity Repetitive loss properties are defined as properties that have had 2 or more flood insurance claims of $1,000 or more in any rolling 10 -year period. Property owners are asked to consider mitigation activities such as acquisition, relocation, or elevation, among other options. FEMA's Repetitive Loss (RL) properties strategy is to eliminate or reduce the damage to property and the disruption to life caused by repeated flooding of the same properties. Property owners are notified of their status by FEMA. The previous 5 repetitive loss structures still stand. 3 are Commercial structures, with one no longer using the area prone to flooding for business purposes. Since the publishing of the previous Multi Hazard Mitigation Plan, there have been no NFIP flood claims or payouts and only 3 claims for a total of $7409 since 2015. For more on the areas that flood repeatedly in Scott County, see section 4.4.2 Flash Flood and Riverine Flood. 83 IPage 267 5.1.2 Plans and Ordinances Scott County and its incorporated communities have a number of plans and ordinances in place to ensure the safety of residents and the effective operation of communities, including a Zoning Ordinance, Floodplain Ordinance, Emergency Operations Plan, Capital Improvements Plan, and Local Water Plan. In Section 4.4 of this plan (Hazard Profiles) a review of the plans and programs in place was included as related to each of the hazards addressed in the plan. 5.2 Mitigation Goals In Section 4.0 of this plan, the risk assessment identified Scott County as prone to a number of natural and technological hazards. The steering committee members understand that although hazards cannot be eliminated altogether, Scott County can work toward building disaster -resistant communities. The mitigation goals from the initial mitigation plan were reviewed and have been completely revised. The goals, strategies and objectives listed for natural hazards in the 2024 Minnesota State Hazard Mitigation Plan were adopted for use in the Scott County Plan (Table 29). This framework will allow for integration of the mitigation actions that are listed by Scott County and its jurisdictions into the state plan. The state will then be able to develop a statewide strategy that will benefit all of Minnesota. Flooding Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, property loss and economic disruption due to all types of flooding (riverine, flash flooding, dam/levee failure) Mitigation Strategy Objectives Prevention: Planning, technical studies, training, adoption of ordinances and legislation, acquisition and use of equipment, establishing shelters, and encouraging participation in NFIP and CRS will be used to prevent or reduce risks to lives and property from flooding. Property Protection: Acquire/demolish, elevate or retrofit RL, SRL, substantially damaged properties and other flood prone properties. Identify vulnerable state owned structures and critical infrastructure. Public Education and Awareness: Utilize existing and promote public education campaigns (ex. Turn Around, Don't Drown and FloodSmart.gov) Access to information will be used to raise public awareness of risks from flooding in order to prevent or reduce those risks. Natural Resource Protection: Stream corridor protection projects and restoration and soil erosion control projects will be used to prevent or reduce risks and increase the protection of natural resources from flooding. Emergency Services: Technological improvements, warning systems, responder training, emergency response services, acquisition and use of equipment, and planning will provide emergency services to prevent or reduce the risks to lives and property from flooding. 84IPage 268 Structural Improvements: Construction and maintenance of drains, sewer drainage and separation projects, floodwalls, dams, culverts, levees, roads, bridges, and general flood protection projects will be used to prevent or reduce damages from flooding, loss of services to critical equipment, and the risks they pose to lives, property, and the natural environment. Wildfire Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, property loss, natural resources and economic disruption due to wildfire. J Mitigation Strategy Objectives Prevention: Enforcement of regulations, adoption of ordinances, technical studies, and planning will be used to prevent or reduce wild land fires and the risks they pose to lives, property, and the natural environment. Property Protection: Vegetation management, defensible space, and water treatment measures (for example, sprinklers) will be used to prevent or reduce the risk of wild land fires. Public Education and Awareness: Public education and access to information will be used to raise public awareness of risks from wild land fires in order to prevent or reduce those risks, specifically the Firewise program. Emergency Services: Planning, responder training, acquisition and use of equipment, evacuations, warning systems, technological improvements, and emergency response services will provide emergency services to prevent or reduce risks to lives and property from wild land fires. Structural Improvements: New or retrofit construction utilizing fire resistant building materials and installation and maintenance of sprinkler and warning systems will be used to prevent or reduce the risk of wild land fires. Windstorms Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, property loss, and economic disruption due to windstorms. Mitigation Strategy Objectives Prevention: Planning, training, technical studies, acquisition and use of equipment, adoption of ordinances and legislation, and construction of new or retrofitting safe rooms will be used to prevent or reduce risks from windstorms to lives, property, and economic activity. Property Protection: Constructing safe rooms and storm shelters, retrofitting, and vegetation management will be used to prevent or reduce risks to the protection of property from windstorms. Public Education and Awareness: Public education, warning systems, and access to information will be used to raise public awareness of risks from windstorms in order to prevent or reduce those risks. Emergency Services: Warning systems, responder training, emergency response services, technological improvements, and response and recovery planning will provide emergency services to prevent or reduce risks from windstorms. Structural Improvements: Construction of storm shelters and safe rooms and maintenance of other structural projects will be used to prevent or reduce risks from windstorms. 85 IPage 269 Severe Winter Storms Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, property loss, and economic disruption due to severe winter storms. , Mitigation Strategy Objectives Prevention: Acquisition and use of equipment, adoption and enforcement of ordinances and legislation, planning, training, and technical studies will be used to prevent or reduce risk to the protection of lives, property, and economic activity from the risks from severe winter storms. Property Protection: Acquisition and use of equipment and vegetation management will be used to prevent or reduce risks to property from severe winter storms. Public Education and Awareness: Public education, warning systems, access to information, and outreach projects will be used to raise public awareness of the risks from severe winter storms in order to reduce those risks. Emergency Services: Acquisition and use of equipment, emergency response services, warning systems, technological improvements, planning, and responder training will provide emergency services to prevent or reduce risks from severe winter storms. Structural Improvements: Structural projects for critical infrastructure will be implemented and maintained to prevent or reduce risks from severe winter storms. Lightning Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, property losses, loss of services, and economic disruption due to lightning. Mitigation Strategy Objectives Prevention: Planning, technical studies, acquisition and use of equipment, adoption of ordinances and legislation, and establishing shelters will be utilized to prevent or reduce the risks from lightning. Property Protection: Retrofits and construction of safe rooms and storm shelters will be used to prevent or reduce the risks to property from lightning. Public Education and Awareness: Public education, outreach projects, and access to information will be used to raise public awareness of risks from lightning in order to prevent or reduce those risks. Emergency Services: Responder training, warning systems, emergency response services, planning, acquisition and use of equipment, and technological improvements will provide emergency services to prevent or reduce risks to lives and property from lightning. Structural Improvements: The construction of safe rooms, shelters, and underground utility lines as well as maintenance of structural projects will be used to prevent or reduce risks from lightning. Tornado Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, property loss, and economic disruption due to tornadoes. Mitigation Strategy Objectives Prevention: Adoption of ordinances and legislation, acquisition and use of equipment, planning, conducting technical training, studies, and retrofit or construction of safe rooms will be used to prevent or reduce risks to lives, property, and economic activity from tornadoes. 86 IPage 270 Property Protection: Constructing safe rooms and storm shelters, and retrofits will be used to prevent or reduce risks to property from tornadoes. Public Education and Awareness: Warning systems, IPAWS, public education, and access to information will be used to raise public awareness of risks from tornadoes in order to prevent or reduce those risks. Emergency Services: Warning systems, technological improvements, responder training, planning, emergency response services, and acquisition and use of equipment will provide emergency services to prevent or reduce risks from tornadoes. Structural Improvements: Construction of storm shelter and safe rooms and maintenance of other structural projects will be used to prevent or reduce risks from tornadoes. Drought Goal: Reduce economic loss and environmental impacts due to drought Mitigation Strategy Objectives Prevention: Planning, acquisition and use of equipment, and technical studies will be used to prevent or reduce risks from drought. Property Protection: Water treatment measures will be used to prevent or reduce risks to property from drought Public Education and Awareness: Public education and access to information will be used to raise public awareness of risks from drought in order to prevent or reduce those risks. Natural Resource Protection: Planning and implementing watershed plans will be used to prevent or reduce risks from drought. Structural Improvements: Technological improvements and acquisition of equipment for structural projects will be used to prevent or reduce risks from drought. Extreme Heat Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, and economic disruption due to extreme heat. Mitigation Strategy Objectives Prevention: Planning and the acquisition and use of equipment will be used to prevent or reduce risks from extreme heat. Property Protection: Acquisition and use of equipment will be used to prevent or reduce risks to property and economic disruption from extreme heat. Public Education and Awareness: Public education and access to information will be used to raise public awareness of the risks from extreme heat in order to prevent or reduce those risks. Structural Improvements: Planning, responder training, warning systems, establishing shelters, and technological improvements will provide emergency services to prevent or reduce risks from extreme heat. Extreme Cold Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, property loss, and economic disruption due to extreme cold. Mitigation Strategy Objectives Prevention: Planning and the acquisition and use of equipment will be used to prevent or reduce risks from extreme cold. Property Protection: Acquisition and use of equipment will be used to prevent or reduce risks to property and economic disruption from extreme cold. 87IPagi 271 Public Education and Awareness: Public education and access to information will be used to raise public awareness of the risks from extreme cold in order to prevent or reduce those risks. Structural Improvements: Planning, responder training, warning systems, establishing shelters, and technological improvements will provide emergency services to prevent or reduce risks from extreme cold. Table 28. Goals, Strategies, and Objectives for Natural Hazards from the 2019 Minnesota State Hazard Mitigation Plan 5.3 Mitigation Actions and Projects Upon completion of the risk assessment and development of the goals and objectives, the steering committee was provided a list of the 6 mitigation measure categories from the FEMA State and Local Mitigation Planning How to Guides. The list of Mitigation Actions by Strategy provided by HSEM was used to assist in identifying mitigation action strategies. The measures are listed as follows: 1. Prevention: Government, administrative, or regulatory actions or processes that influence the way land and buildings are developed and built. These actions also include public activities to reduce hazard losses. Examples include planning and zoning, building codes, capital improvement programs, open space preservation, and stormwater management regulations. 2. Property Protection: Actions that involve the modification of existing buildings or structures to protect them from a hazard or removal from the hazard area. Examples include acquisition, elevation, structural retrofits, storm shutters, and shatter -resistant glass. 3. Public Education and Awareness: Actions to inform and educate citizens, elected officials, and property owners about the hazards and potential ways to mitigate them. Such actions include outreach projects, real estate disclosure, hazard information centers, and school -age and adult education programs. 4. Natural Resource Protection: Actions that, in addition to minimizing hazard losses, preserve or restore the functions of natural systems. These actions include sediment and erosion control, stream corridor restoration, watershed management, forest and vegetation management, and wetland restoration and preservation. 5. Emergency Services: Actions that protect people and property during and immediately after a disaster or hazard event. Services include warning systems, emergency response services, and protection of critical facilities. 6. Structural Projects: Actions that involve the construction of structures to reduce the impact of a hazard. Such structures include dams, levees, floodwalls, seawalls, retaining walls, and safe rooms. In the review and discussion of selected mitigation strategies and actions, steering committee members and public meeting participants were asked to consider the ranking of mitigation actions by priority for implementation. Guidance for ranking mitigation activities is drawn from FEMA 88IPage 272 evaluation criteria. The evaluation criteria (STAPLE+E) involved the following categories and questions: Social: 7. Will the proposed action adversely affect one segment of the population? 8. Will the action disrupt established neighborhoods, break up voting districts, or cause the relocation of lower income people? Technical: 9. How effective is the action in avoiding or reducing future losses? 10. Will it create more problems than it solves? 11. Does it solve the problem or only a symptom? 12. Does the mitigation strategy address continued compliance with the NFIP? Administrative: 13. Does the jurisdiction have the capability (staff, technical experts, and/or funding) to implement the action, or can it be readily obtained? 14. Can the community provide the necessary maintenance? 15. Can it be accomplished in a timely manner? Political: 16. Is there political support to implement and maintain this action? 17. Is there a local champion willing to help see the action to completion? 18. Is there enough public support to ensure the success of the action? 19. How can the mitigation objectives be accomplished at the lowest cost to the public? Legal: 20. Does the community have the authority to implement the proposed action? 21. Are the proper laws, ordinances, and resolutions in place to implement the action? 22. Are there any potential legal consequences? 23. Is there any potential community liability? 24. Is the action likely to be challenged by those who may be negatively affected? 25. Does the mitigation strategy address continued compliance with the NFIP? Economic: 26. Are there currently sources of funds that can be used to implement the action? 27. What benefits will the action provide? 28. Does the cost seem reasonable for the size of the problem and likely benefits? 29. What burden will be placed on the tax base or local economy to implement this action? 89 IPage 273 30. Does the action contribute to other community economic goals such as capital improvements or economic development? 31. What proposed actions should be considered but be "tabled" for implementation until outside sources of funding are available? Environmental: 32. How will this action affect the environment (land, water, endangered species)? 33. Will this action comply with local, state, and federal environmental laws and regulations? 34. Is the action consistent with community environmental goals? 5.3.1 Hazard Mitigation Actions Scott County and its included municipalities share a common Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan and worked closely to develop it. These people work together with their city councils and the Scott County Deputy Emergency Management Director to assure that the hazards and mitigation actions included in this plan are accurate and addressed in their jurisdictions. The jurisdictions responsible for each action are: Belle Plaine, Credit River, Elko New Market, Jordan, Prior Lake, Savage, Shakopee, and Scott County. Table 31 lists all mitigation actions for Scott County and its jurisdictions. Appendix G contains separate mitigation action tables for each jurisdiction. Each of these mitigation action charts detail the hazard, the mitigation action to address it, the priority ranking for implementation (1 = High Priority; 2 = Moderate Priority; 3 = Low Priority), its current stage of implementation, the timeframe for implementation going forward, the jurisdictions who have identified they will work to implement the action, the responsible parties to carry through with implementation, and comments on how the plan will be implemented through existing planning mechanisms and funding to make implementation happen. Completed mitigation actions from the 2016 Scott County Hazard Mitigation Plan are listed in Appendix H. The status designations are: 1. New - actions have not yet started 2. Ongoing - actions require continuing application 3. In Progress - actions are currently being acted upon 4. Complete - the action is complete 5. Deferred - no progress has been made 6. Deleted - the action is no longer relevant The mitigation types are defined as follows: 7. P = Prevention 8. PP = Property Protection 9. PE = Public Education 901 274 10. NRP = Natural Resource Protection 11. ES =Emergency Services 12. SI = Structural Improvement 5.3.2 Mitigation Actions by Community This plan is a multi -jurisdictional plan that covers Scott County (SC), its school districts, the cities of Belle Plaine (BP), Credit River (CR), Elko New Market (ENM), Jordan (J), New Prague (NP), Prior Lake (PL), Savage (S), and Shakopee (Sh). This plan also covers the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community (SMSC), a federally recognized, sovereign Indian tribe of Mdewakanton Dakota people. The Scott County risks and mitigation activities identified in this plan also incorporate the concerns and needs of townships and other entities participating in this plan. 91 page 275 Mitigation Actions for Scott Counhy o • c 7.5 CA 4- LT4 ai 60 75 5 En 0 O 2026-2030 w a an U U bA U OO U C ¢ c° O U N N O o O � ▪ O O U ❑ a V � � O U U N U All Hazards bOA b17 O bOA t0i) O b.() 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O if) VI N 64 EA 4A Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Public Health Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh 2026-2030 2026-2030 2026-2030 Ln V) W w w Medium 0 0 Medium -o o Train and equip 1st responders for search and rescue missions. Train and equip 1" responders to respond to mass -casualty events. Train 1st responders and community officials on the National Incident Mgmt. System. All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards N on d 2026 Mitigation Action Status y U to o a. C Deferred U t w q v t w q Est. Cost O O O O O Lfl O O co O O Ln O O O O O v co O co N Possible Funding Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/Education Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Departments Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Red Cross; Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; Local School Districts, City Police Depts 'A O t H L SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh 5 R E w O N on o 0 N N O O Non 0 0 N N QS O Non 0 0 N N O Non 0 0 N N o a F" a a. a a. cn cn v. Priority 0 a 0 a Mitigation Action Obtain & install emergency generators or "pigtails" for critical government facilities and fuel depots. Assist non -governmental critical facilities to obtain emergency generators and/or pigtails. Obtain funding to add disaster shelters as necessary. Assist schools to implement a disaster phone line. Hazard Vi L. O N U x All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards 4* 2026 Mitigation Action Status ° 1~ s. ° w N Q ° 1~ . ° w N Q Deferred Deferred Est. Cost O O O Ni EA O O O N EA O O O CV c-1 4R O O O 0- N ER Possible Funding a Y� N '' CJ te aS aC+ aJ 0 O0 O 7 V Oa County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Y 0,...,•) V Y o v) CL O 'O O N 7 .v, bD y .y u a O Ul ... " " o "" o w a.. c..) z a v v O ,4 U V N W v is ',> p, O O cLJ v N N a Y Y 0 4. a ''O ,.-- c_.) O V U . Y V y, Y ... 0. ° W o 0 o cn w o2j cn a. ci s Scott County EM; Scott County Public Works Scott County EM Jurisdictions a.z , z ,,Z (n W c i cra U a. a.z V ,r cn W c/i V] V 0. Scott County Scott County d E E R F w cO O Non O O N NI O N M N N NI NI O N on O O N N Annually CU F W 0 a, Priority a a E a O O Medium Mitigation Action Assist utilities in developing restoration and mitigation plans. Assist businesses, schools, the special needs population and public facilities to post evacuation routes. Obtain signage to direct public evacuation during hazard events. Develop/implement/maintain the community's Mitigation Action Plan. Hazard y ^C s. N N N x va 'C s. N N N All Hazards All Hazards it 0, O c-1 .--I c-1 c-1 2026 Mitigation Action Status U :,,..- a t> C] Deferred Est. Cost O O O N Ln fn O O O N ss Possible Funding County Budget, Grants County/Business Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM,Scott County Admin; City Police Depts; City Admin Scott County EM, City Police Depts Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Time - frame O NI M N O O N N O NI M O O N N CU Q F (n W CA W Priority E 7 -a N 3 a Mitigation Action Obtain funds for critical government departments to develop Continuity of Operations Plans. Assist businesses to develop Business Continuity Plans. Hazard ^6 s. N N N All Hazards M c-1 d' c-1 Deferred an o o 0 2026 Mitigation Action Status Deferred a o 0 In Progress 0 0 O N .--1 h 0 o O N -E i Est. Cost 0 0 0 N c-1 b4 0 0 0 N N. EH $2,000 Cnty/City/Twp Budget � I I Scott County Cnty/City/Twp EM; City Police Budget & Fire Depts Possible Funding County/City Budget, Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Scott County EM, Scott County Admin; City Admin Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police U_ i ti C R. V N . U8 U v] x Q 0.. x J..' s., .0 B, O cn W 6' a. V Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh y 0 O t :� co) SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh CC vi V J P, R. Fz O. L) Z Lnn W nn SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh NI O N en 0 0 NI NI ,O O NI on O O Ni NI mod�++ d P ez L H 4+ NI O N M O O Ni Ni NI O NI on O O Ni Ni v5 O NI on O O Ni Ni cn w cn w d a • - F w cn w w a Medium I I Ensure mutual aid, shelter, response, mass casualty & recovery agreements Medium are current. Priority Medium ox) x Medium Assist communities in developing strategies to prevent loss of public records. Mitigation Action Assist critical sites to develop and provide an emergency plan to the EMA. Install new warning sirens in new developments rural townships and replace older sirens. Educate public on how to sign up for CodeRED. All Hazards All Hazards Hazard All Hazards I- N N R X All Hazards I c-1 ka c-1 it r-- c-1 co c-1 a, c-1 2026 Mitigation Action F Status an o C an C 0 Ongoing an C o an C 0 Est. Cost 0 0 co O Ni H3 $35,000 co 0 co cn -ER Possible Funding County Budget City Budget County Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County Sheriff's Office Shakopee Police Department Scott County EM Jurisdictions Scott County Scott County, Shakopee Scott County Time - frame O II)Ni M N O O N N Ni O N M O O N N ,O O N en O O N N CD a F cn w w a Priority Medium E C 0 a Mitigation Action Create and maintain a backup 911 dispatch center. I I Improve protection against the elements for the City of Shakopee's fleet of city owned vehicles. Modify the current mass notification system to be compatible with other languages. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards # O Ni Ni Ni Ni County/City Budget %.0 NI M O O N N C1. Q O 0 0_ a) 0 0 s= ro ai C C O O N u_ < O' G f6 W LL 2 a f6 in bA C All Hazards Ca) N 2026 Mitigation Action Status Ongoing Y a, O C In Progress Completed Deferred 73 O a a) o Est. Cost O O O NI H) O O O O N Y3 O O O NI {{) O O O if) O O O O NI fR O O O N -EA- Possible Funding Cnty/City/Twp Budget County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants Cnty/City/BOE Budget Grants County/Dept Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; Scott County Public Works Scott County Parks & Trails Scott County EM; Scott County Public Works Scott County Planning & Resource Management Scott County EM 15t Responder Agencies, EMA col O O t I,) L SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh G O O C_, O CA Scott County Scott County Scott County Scott County Time - frame s0 O NI M 0 0 NI NI O NI M O O NI NI O NI M O O N NI VS O NI M O O NI NI O NI M O O NI NI N0 O NI M O O NI NI a) I= CL1 LL V)C/) Cx] W Cl.) W Cl) Cx] Cl) CT.] Priority bA x a 0 a) 0 3 a a Mitigation Action Distribute safe room/shelter in place information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Develop a plan to trim and clear trees in county -owned parkland. Identify & reserve county land as a staging area to store and process storm debris. Modify zoning ordinances allowing temporary debris staging areas. Obtain NOAA weather radios for schools, government and special needs facilities. Distribute high wind preparedness and response information to the special needs population, schools and the community. Hazard Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Number d' NI U) NI l0 NI N. N co NI 0, NI ca 2021 Mitigation Action Status a 0 to o Vl O a. c a> w 0 In Progress In Progress I I Est. Cost o O O nj ,ti Vi O 0 O O EA O O O O O N U9 O 0 O N EA 0 0 O vi EA Possible Funding Cnty/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Grants County Budget County Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts N V vi. 'n Y ^ x u ❑ Y o v B' o .'aCi x .- a, 4 4, 'r p O sO Lam' a, a. cn w L) a. c..J 0 0 Scott County EM, City Police Depts; City Administration Scott County EM, City Police Depts; City Administration EMA Community Services Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh az m , c= .a v' co al vi Li' c4 co c> n. SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Scott County Time - frame ,E, co NI M O O N N vo N M O O N N NIo N M 0 0 N NI goo NI M O O NI N vo N M O O N N Ca a ELF cn a, a. L-7> anw La L O s. a. Medium 7 V bA x Medium Medium Mitigation Action Train & equip 1st responders to respond to high wind events. Develop a debris clearance program that can be utilized countywide. Obtain funding to build mobile home community storm shelters. Adopt & enforce mobile home tie down and skirting legislation. Identify storm shelters in the development of master plans for county parks. Hazard Summer Storms, Winter Storms ,.,-- E N I O I.., O (n V N s, E N Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms it o CO c-1 CO N CO M M d' M 2021 Mitigation Action Status Deleted I I In Progress I I Est. Cost 0 0 0 0 0 O O NI N EA EA Possible Funding County/Utility Budget, Grants County/Utility Budget Responsible Agencies Community Services Utilities, EMA Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Scott County Time - frame O NI M N O N M NI O O O O N N N N V 04 F n w a, Priority 0 0 O .a .a Mitigation Action Research the feasibility of requiring the burying of power lines in all new rural cluster subdivisions. Assist power utilities in implementing a power outage alerting program for the public. Hazard Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms in M M In Progress a) .6J a) o U In Progress 2021 Mitigation Action Status to to C 0 tio o ex 0 0 Ongoing In Progress In Progress Deferred 0 0 0 Ni EA- 0 O O T EA- 0 0 O d' ER Est. Cost 0 O O N V3 0 O 0 Q O V) En- 0 O O Ili N EH 0 O 0 N '-1 ES O 0 0 Ni‘ EH 0 0 0 0- O NI ES County/Dept Budget FEMA HMA grant funding Cnty/City/Emergency Management/Public Health budget Possible Funding County/State Budget, Grants County/State Budget, Grants County/State Budget, Grants County/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Grants Scott County Public Health; Scott County HHS Elko New Market Police Dept; Elko New Market City Admin Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Responsible Agencies Public Works EMA Community Services Public Works EMA Community Services Public Works EMA Community Services Public Works, EMA Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Local School Districts 1st Responder Agencies, EMA SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Elko New Market SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh (A O N L Scott County Scott County Scott County Scott County SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Scott County NI O NI M O O N NI O NI M O O NI NI O N M O O N NI Time - frame lD O N M O O N NI l0 O NI M O O N N O N M O O N NI LL O NI M O O NI NI O NI M O O NI NI O NI M O O NI N °' W ow., 61 aa. F a z O. cn O.] cn [4 W O. N CO -oc�n x 0 et Priority] Medium E o a° Medium a° a° Identify special needs populations that rely on electricity for medical equipment. Install generator at the Elko New Market Police Department Headquarters. Educate public on how to stay safe during storms and promote the use of emergency kits and 72 -hour shelter -in -place kits Mitigation Action Identify resources to combat the Emerald Ash Borer. Obtain equipment for control and removal of infestation (i.e. chain saws, chippers, PPE, trucks). Identify and plan for other agriculture infestation in Scott County. Train and equip 1st responders to respond to an ice/snow event. Distribute flood preparedness and response information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Train and equip a swift - water rescue team. Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Hazard Summer Storms, Drought Summer Storms, Drought Summer Storms, Drought Winter Storms Flooding Flooding h M CO M O� M O d' c -I d' N d' M d' d' d' Lfi d' c o 1-I 7.5 C O N OOA . V i O N ,ti .t Vf X N u, sv. O P. ❑ In Progress N y a O P. c In Progress y O V [4 o O o O N EA o O 0 O N U9 o o O P, M O 0 0 N ER Possible Funding Y CU to Non c_.) \aa '' C 7m O s- CJ C7 County Budget, Grants .61 0 O Wa i -+' 7m O V C7 County Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies vi 4.' x p V o.� °'o roa° v EA V cn 4:-.+' Y C.J c O vi i s. z" L.' sN. .� N O. z i y 'L i o o o c v v cn a V 3 2r CJ 6 2r 6 Community Services 'CZ v] s:. x YL° .,:i...x a u y a s•. . O, o �_ 3 .� Pte, m Q a F Pte. Scott Watershed Mgmt. Organization y O La 'C H •L "-' PC vi V J 0.� P.. co P. vUi 'Z Z VV, W V, Scott County, Prior Lake +�' O C 00 .a U p P. V3 Scott County, Jordan dd 5R F" w O O O NI NI O 0 0 NI NI O O O NI NI o NI 0,1 O O NI NI d F c7 cG Z z z 71 t' I... O 'S. 0. man x . CCC x m an x Medium Mitigation Action Obtain equipment to mitigate flooding on bridges, culverts, and roads. Obtain grant funding to study for Markley Lake and O'Dowd Lake outlet improvements. Acquire easements and prepare property to increase stormwater storage capacity in the Upper Watershed (Spring Lake TWP) to protect agricultural property and downstream communities. This storage would reduce peak flows on Spring and Prior Lakes Work with the City of Jordan on flood damage reduction efforts. Hazard CC o .C O 0 w Flooding CC O .C O 0 w Flooding d rn d o on ti LC Possible Funding Jurisdictions Mitigation Action IC \ \ In Progress a. C a.,'-. In Progress K \ p \ En- $5,000 ci EA- CO o J@ County, City Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants _ ± / y { j \\®20/ \,,bz,Eo . ,rs§ ® s a a= 2a{ J/2 Scott County Public Works } j% ��� a t 2q/ Scott Watershed Mgmt. Organization Scott Watershed Mgmt. Organization Scott Watershed Mgmt. Organization }\ \\ U'). /)a Scott County ) 0 \ Scott County Scott County Scott County NI NI NI NI NI NI NI NI NI NI NI NI 7 G E 7 @ \ \ ,-a % Medium Medium \ Work with local units of government to ensure completion of local flooding risk projects. Obtain additional temporary road closure supplies (i.e. signs, cones, barrels, and concrete barriers). Construct an additional parallel pipe, gate valve and submerged inlet that would be independent of the existing outlet structure. Pipe would be approximately 2600 feet long and allow 15-20 cfs added to existing 65 cfs. Acquire easements. Work with Scott County Public Works to plan and discuss future public ditch operations. Coordinate with local units of government on the maintenance of outlet structures. Coordinate with Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems permit requirements. / o Flooding \ o Flooding Flooding Flooding @ G \ 2 3 2 Possible Funding Jurisdictions E Pa Mitigation Action ) \ 7 Scott County NI NI \ Promote and facilitate \ CO Ul Deferred "0 t".0 N 0 Deferred bA tr. 0 $25,000 O O 0 Lri Vi O O 0 u') N EA O O 0 N c-. (A County Budget, Grants County /State Budget, Grants County/State Budget, Grants County/City/Public Health Budget Scott Watershed Mgmt. Organization Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Scott County Public Health Scott County Scott County Scott County, Savage Scott County l0 N O N O M O N ,D N O N O M O N ,.D N O N O M O N N N O N O M O N W a w VI w Medium 0 0 a 0 a Work on a Hwy 169 area drainage feasibility assessment in Louisville Township. Develop a program for the hazards and boating safety of river usage (to include all types of river flow from high to low.) Develop a plan to provide for the safe coexistence of commercial and recreational navigation. Create a Community Service Response Team to mobilize during floods. Flooding Flooding Flooding CIA 0 0 0 w 0, Lf) O l0 c -I l0 N l0 Possible Funding a) Mitigation Action In Progress In Progress Deferred In Progress Ongoing O 0 O O O tf) EA 0 O 0 O O O M H3 o O O N 4A O O o N 64 0 co O O c-1 b4 County Budget, Grants Cnty/City/State Budget Grants County/City Budget County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Scott County Public Works EMA, DNR, Scott County, Jordan, Prior Lake Public Works DOT County Commission Scott County EM; Scott County Public Health Scott County EM; City EM; Shakopee Scott County Scott County, Jordan, Prior Lake Scott County SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh ,.D O INC on O O N N ,..L O N en O O N N lD O INC en O O N N ID O N M O O N N ID O Ni en O O N N cn a a ,. w C. Cl) L4 V) w Medium Medium 0 0 a A CA x A CA x Develop solutions if hillside erosion studies have a positive cost/benefit analysis and achievable methods. Buy-out property where reoccurring damages exist. Distribute information to the community on areas of potential landslides or mudslides Identify citizens subject to suffering from extreme temperatures. Create a Power Outage Policy for critical facilities. Flooding, Landslides/ Erosion Flooding landslides/ Erosion Landslides/ Erosion Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold CO VD d' '0 N '0 L, V CO VD v N O ' t'. V ,EN 0- „ L, = O O V z a, X> O 2026 Mitigation Action Status C0I O .a to O o OD 0 o 0 o 10 N 0 0 In Progress In Progress Est. Cost O O O ''' EFT O O O 0 o N 4H O O o N EA- O O o Lei Y3 O O O to N 49- Possible Funding County/City/ Emergency Management/Public Health budget County/City Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget County Budget, Grants County/State Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Health Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Departments Scott Agriculture, County EMA Community Services Scott County EM; City Fire Departments Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Scott County SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, 1, NP, PL, S, Sh Time - frame \ .0 O N M O O NI NI %.O O N M O O N NI CO O N M O O NI NI NO O N M O O NI NI I O NI M O O NI NI O at. H aa a,, in W 0 a a4 z al 0 Priority 5 0 a g a -a 3 a° Mitigation Action Educate the public on the dangers of extreme temperatures, particularly outdoor workers and kids playing sports. Create cooling/warming shelters for vulnerable populations. Distribute drought awareness and response materials to the public. Support the DNB's rules for water use conservation for all cities applying for new high capacity municipal wells. Distribute wildfire awareness and preparedness information to schools and the public. Hazard Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Drought Drought Wildfires It m � NI N. 2026 Mitigation Action Status Ongoing Est. Cost O O Possible Funding County/City Budget Grants Responsible Agencies City Fire Departments Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, 1, NP, PL, S, Sh Time - frame O NI N en O O NI NI 0 a x z Priority a° Mitigation Action Provide rural vegetation management educational information. Hazard i v., at -to bA vas a 0 In Progress City Fire County/City Budget $12,000 Ongoing Departments Grants 0.0 C .C tO C 0 In Progress 2026 Mitigation Action Status On C 0 CL0 C 0 In Progress In Progress In Progress On C 0 b.0 C 0 O O O M b4 O O O '' b4 O O O NI- r-1 474 Est. Cost $52,000 O O O Ni -ER $2,000,000 O O O N vi O O O nj M -En- County Budget County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants Possible Funding County/Dept Budget Grants County/Dept Budget County/Dept Budget Grants County Budget County/City Public Health Budget Grants Scott County 0 C O bA N s. i .'C s. to O �aa Y � C O 'N L' CO c6 N C City Fire Departments Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Fire Departments County Commission Scott County Public Works; City Public Works County Commission Public Health County Commission, 1st Responders EMA Scott County 1 I i I I I i Complete proactive life safety SC, SMSC, BP, CR, Wildfires, 2026- 76 inspections of high density High P EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Structure Fires housing. 2030 Sh ,=4. v V a a w a V Z vl z v, w v, SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh Scott County SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Scott County Scott County o N M O O N NI ‘.o o NI M O O NI NI ,o o NI M O O NI NI Time - frame so o NI M O O NI NI ,0 O NI M O O NI NI ‘0 O NI M O O NI NI k.o o NI M O O NI NI so 0 NI M O O NI NI a z a a m H 0 a a w C ._ C C Medium Priority C a Medium t x C a C C Obtain permits to allow preventative burns on peat land. Adopt Appendix H of the MN Fire Code to eliminate BBQ grills on balconies and patios of structures with 3 or more units. Complete Fire Prevention Programs in schools and adult assisted living facilities. Mitigation Action Assist in obtaining a fire education -training trailer for the jurisdiction. Adopt & enforce sprinkler and smoke alarm legislation for all facilities. Acquire and install six-inch water mains and hydrants communitywide. Adopt & enforce housing code legislation to limit number of citizens in housing. Train & equip 1st responders to respond to pandemics and epidemics P cC Wildfires, Structure Fires Wildfires, Structure Fires Hazard Structure Fires Structure Fires Structure Fires Structure Fires Infectious Diseases v7 IN t, L. co N. it C N. O CO .-+ CO NI CO M CO U o cn ra N a .N o ap U U U r 0 � y U � L 2026 Mitigation Action Status Deferred In Progress Deferred Deferred bC 0 0 U 0 C Deferred Ongoing Est. Cost O O O O O 1--1 EA O O O O O c-1 {A O O O O I f) iR $25,000 O O O lf] ER O O O O O NI Y3 O o O p' O N {q Possible Funding County/State Budget, Grants County/State Budget, Grants County/State Budget, Grants County/State Budget, Grants County/State Budget, Grants County/State Budget, Grants County/State Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Lower Mn River Watershed District Lower MN River Watershed District Lower Mn. River Watershed District Lower MN River Watershed District Lower MN River Watershed District Lower Mn. River Watershed District Lower Mn River Watershed District, Scott WMO IA J 0 O '0 H L R Scott County Scott County Scott County Scott County Scott County Scott County Scott County Time - frame �O o N M O O N N \O O N M O O N N L.0 O N M O O N N \.O O N M O O N N s.0 O N M O O N N ,.O O IN M O O N N %.p o NI M O O N N a. F cr) w CG z C z C z aC z c4 z aG z t" i 0 a. a Medium a a Medium a a Mitigation Action Support county area planning by using the Metro Council's model to assess groundwater impact of continued development. Analyze data to document trends on issues such as water usage, contamination, quality, and availability. Determine fen and trout stream recharge areas. Develop a channel lobby for funding to assess unregulated discharges in the MN River Basin. Improve groundwater monitoring in the Watershed Management Organization. Work with the Metropolitan Council to complete a model of the metro region. Support wellhead protection efforts by providing staff time and technical assistance. Hazard Groundwater Contamination Groundwater Contamination Groundwater Contamination Groundwater Contamination Groundwater Contamination Groundwater Contamination Groundwater Contamination it ,O O 1, W co co Q, co o O, .-1 O N 2026 Mitigation Action Status Deferred Deferred Deferred Deferred In Progress In Progress Est. Cost County/State 850,000 Budget, Grants Possible Funding a{ /G \\ /\ County/State Budget, Grants & ± \\ /\ . ± /\ /\ Cnty/City/Dept Budget Grants Responsible Agencies Lower Mn. River Watershed District 0 / 7II cn ti \\�\ 3§/5 Lower Minnesota River Watershed District 1st Responder Agencies, EMA, BOE, 1st Responder Agencies, EMA Scott County EM; City Fire Departments 7 k Scott County E \ \ a Scott County E \ \ a ± / C a SC, SMSC, BP, CR,EMN,J,NP, PL, S, Sh Q. �a NI cn 55 j3 55 33 38 33 / Z - - Z Z - [ - E § § ( / \ a \ { _ \ \ _ \ a 3 \ \ Mitigation Action Adopt minimum, consistent runoff peak standards within the watershed district. Reduce/stop groundwater contamination of fens and trout streams (Eagle Creek and Savage Fen) by identifying sources and limiting/stopping contaminant release. Identify ways to maintain supply of groundwater to fens and trout streams with the watershed district. Distribute hazardous materials event preparedness and response information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Educate schools' special needs populations and the community on chemical hazards in the area and evacuation routes. Obtain hazmat containment equipment for water, roads, and railroads. Hazard Groundwater Contamination ,§ CLI /\ g\ g{ @_ Groundwater Contamination g� g 5 %% )/ g� g 5 %% )/ Hazardous Materials lt 2 7 2 $ \ CO 2026 Mitigation Est. Cost Action Status Deferred Ongoing / o Deferred 2026 Mitigation Est. Cost Action Status In Progress 0 Ni 44 0 Ni b9- Possible Funding \\ J3 Cnty/Dept/BOE Budget County/Dept Budget County/Dept Budget Possible Funding County/Dept Budget Responsible Agencies ® a,\) \\\'gig)\ t) g; a q& 2 awuE0 Scott County EM; City Police Departments Scott County EM; City Police Departments Scott County EM; City Police Departments Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police Depts; Scott County GIS 0 6 e\ s / � )3/ y// SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh e\ ci \5\ J4/ SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d § •^" 1.., 5« 3R 33 33 ' %d ga NI on 33 / a E Educate government officials, the special Terrorism needs population, and Low PE schools on procedures for handling suspicious mail. E \ w a § Priority 0 \ ® /o 0 \ 2 f 5 Mitigation Action Adopt & enforce Hazardous hazardous materials Materials site building setback legislation. Distribute terrorism preparedness and Terrorism awareness information to schools and the public. Post terrorism and bomb identification Terrorism information in buildings and schools. Hazard Mitigation Action Identify & distribute to appropriate officials Terrorism potential terrorism targets information. Hazard # $ 3 3 3 # 3 bA crs LL O 'O co U 0 U 0) H 0 ti Ca b0 O • 0 (7 N M O O N N V) 00 'O U 0 U 0 H H V (N N CO O O N N V) 00 0 O 0 O O O O O ({) G) 00 O 7 (N N M O O N N O Q 0 ❑ ▪ 7 U 00 (N N M O O N N Priority Type V) 00 M 00 an x 7 All Hazards 00 0 ti Mitigation Action •O O 0 0 be E 0 o o.N V 0 L; 0 C w -m ca x E 3 O O 0 a. U 0 N E E o Y N 0) F. y E E o o Y CO ti Ongoing to o an O o 2O26 Mitigation Action Status to o an 0 o Ongoing tn 0 to O O co o 0 an O - 0 o ") fn $75,000 Est. Cost I V $5,000,000 o C. 0 0 0 `-' $35,000 o o' o 0 ti i/T County/City Department Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants Possible Funding County & City Budgets, Grants ' i to 75 CO t- 0 0O vo23vu County Budget, Grants County/Dept Budget, Grants Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts Responsible Agencies County & City Public Works Departments O F O V V N 0C Yr G1 Sheriff's Office Sheriff's Office, Public Works 0.. a z m _ c_ 0.' cn U 0.. n: 0: Z m _ c. CC .a vl U 0.. Jurisdictions 0.; a z CO _ c_ 0. cn CJ 0.. O.. a z m _ c_ a , V .a O. Scott County 2026- 2030 Scott County �D © N on O O N N Ur O', N M,+ O O N N C.) CZ F W sO O N M O O N N CO CD N M O O N N ,O N O N O M O N 0. O. d 9,. F cn O. 01. 0. -0 on .- � x � x L O a. tO x 'x O Ensure an adequate number of sand bags and sand are on hand for flood prone areas of the county Purchase needed flood equipment including pumps and generators Mitigation Action Redesign bridges that contribute to flooding by improving the flow of water and ice under/through the bridges Detect and contain 100% of any malicious activity, including virus and malware on all infrastructure. Maintain contracts with private sources for temporary internet access Create, publish, and distribute a multi- lingual disaster preparedness guide for citizens Improve access to real-time weather data such as temperature, wind speed, direction and storm conditions. Summer Storms to 7:1 O O to 7:1 0 O ril n7 et � .0 o O I- 0 V N ao All Hazards 0 .ti -4 N -H .-y It -1 - ti. .-y d. .ti as) o IA o 1 I I I I I I I I Purchase signage that 2026- SC, SMSC, BP, County and can be used to direct 2030 CR, EMN, J, NP, City Public County & City 116 All Hazards the public during times Pb, , Works Budgets, Grants $150,000 Ongoing Medium ES SSh of emergency Ongoing 2O26 Mitigation Action Status to p LOA 0 Deferred an o LaO 0 an 0 0 0 0 0 OO 1.11 L. b4 0 0 Lf1 EA Est. Cost 0 0 Ln N _ 0 0 o Lf) _ 0 0 0 Lf1 N b4 0 0 0 O d' b4 County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants Possible Funding County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County & City Budget, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants Sheriff's Office • County Public Affairs, Sheriff's Office Responsible Agencies County Public Affairs, Sheriff's Office Sheriff's Office County & City GIS, Scott County Emergency Management; 0..- Q cn O V) V .,'Z' V O -' " a) U Scott County Scott County Jurisdictions Scott County Scott County Belle Plaine, Jordan, Scott County a o; z m , m VI U cn O. j o N Cr) O O N N l0 N O N o Cr) O N CD dC . F. [� w O N O N o M O N l0 N O N O Cr) O N NI NI O N O Cr) O N N O N Cr) O O N N N LL] Cr) W CU CI cn W cc) W CL LL, V] w bA x o d i CI o Medium _o x ,.o baA x Establish a backup 911 Center Create a disaster "Splash Page;" and unpublished website with critical disaster information Mitigation Action Create bi-lingual emergency messaging templates for mass notification systems and social media Provide training for a shelter management team Identify homes, facilities, and/or businesses subject to potential landslides. Create emergency Trauma Kits for responders in order to be prepared to quickly deploy & respond to various emergencies All Hazards All Hazards Hazard All Hazards All Hazards Landslide All Hazards LC) H c-1 L"-- c -I c -I it CO c1 a -I 0, c-1 a -I O NI c -I c -I NI c -I to •o to o to 0 to o 2026 Mitigation Action Status to 0 to 0 to 0 to 0 Ongoing 0 0 o O .--1 iA 0 0 0 a o O , ER Est. Cost 0 0 o ar co A 0 0 0 an `--I EH 0 0 0 Ili b4 l N Y L4 cC C7 VI U Y rt bp '0 a. County budget, Grants Possible Funding County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants p . y p v o E w .�' u o x :W c n. p cii -0- v o cn a�. 7 z c. 7 w c� U I ,? Cx. a o L, Responsible Agencies Sheriff's Office Sheriff's Office ° c-.' 7.6 a N s. u a. w ow o c_) d 3 0 a, as, a 'EdZ a� o G C ai C1 V 0o O 6. Acn a a, o ra L.) .� a cn 0. Jurisdictions Scott County, Belle Plaine, New Prague, Savage, Shakopee Scott County c a p C..J o [n O N M O O N N ‘.6O N co O O N N 6) d E'. E et L F W ND N O N O M O N cO N O N O M O N iD o N M O O N N c/1 6) a - H n W W W a. 0 bf.1 O ' •� D. tO x taC x 7 U A N a a. m U x 0o y a o Z .N .„'3 p to G F." U cC N dV W == u 0 Improve runoff/ drainage of floodwaters on County Road 21 near the bridge between Upper & Lower Prior Lake Mitigation Action Ensure information regarding 302 Facilities is easily accessible to first responders Obtain pet sheltering equipment to utilize during regional events requiring the evacuation of pets Develop a public awareness/educational campaign to educate and target non-English speaking and vulnerable populations '0 F. nY N ra bA 0 O p W n w Hazard Hazmat All Hazards All Hazards N N a —1 M N ,--I it d N c -I an N ,--I 'C NI . -I Ongoing Ongoing Deferred Deferred t0 O te O 2021 Mitigation Action Status J -cZ . N O Q Ongoing O O O O o e» O O O O in e» O O O O o en O O o O i) e» O O O O Est. Cost $5,000,000 o O 0 Ln N +.9- a-7' O trJ .o 0 N N (1$ O s.. V C7 City Budget, Grants City Budget, Private Partner, Grants City Budget, Private Partner, Grants County Budget, Grants Possible Funding City, County, & Tribal Budgets, Grants State or County Budgets, Grants Police Department & Public Works Public Works Public Works Sheriff's Office, County Public Works Responsible Agencies Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts Scott County N .". N L U U iti 0 0 O U O U Jordan 0 c6 o 0 6 'O O Scott County, Shakopee Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Scott County ‘0 O N M O O N N 0 O N M O O N N 0 O N M O O N N 0= N M O O N N ,o o N M O O N NNI d cg E e F W c" oM N O O N r' o Ni O O NI NI C.71 a a a. d M. a. Cl. Z x _an .o _o .0n .Otn x E 0 Priority ,..o x ,..o �tn x ro ' w Y Cr) G g O to--. tE O yN P G O �O F. „ 'O G' F, O >, C O c6 F .O ^ m„ o u 0 .,N 7-1 N OO 'r= 'D '' -d ''' C m O, +,_' o o O 0 U 3 -O rn U 0. �, 0 O c6 Initiate flood -prevention measures at the Valley Green Mobile Home Park in Jordan Dredge the creek -bed that runs through Valley Green Mobile Home Park to make the creek -bed deeper Install larger culvert(s) within Valley Green Mobile Home Park to increase drainage during flooding. Replace dysfunctional river gauge on the Minnesota River bridge in Shakopee Mitigation Action Raise roadways that are historically prone to flooding Prevent or eliminate invasive species from our waterways, trees, and environment m d a) I- k W Flooding Flooding Flooding Flooding Hazard Flooding All Hazards l� Ni a -I W N c -I N ,--I O M c -I c-1 M c -I it N M a -I on M c -I 2 ± Deferred o o o o Ln $7,500 \\\ a.a.c County budget, Grants E\ &s= e _ _ _ _ , _ : 3 \ / \ \ _ ! § \ / ® ® n \ j / \ :.-2 [ \ / \ \ o az\//2LZ0L)>J / \ y / 00 &\ /' a) blD O0 2\a.a/ Scott County _ ® E 0 O / \ 0 ) 0 Th j \ / U : LO '-0 3/\(® 2 \ > \a;a2 Install Transfer Switches on facilities identified as Red Cross Shelters or temporary shelters and Mission Critical Facilities 0 N & All Hazards / % Mitigation Actions for Belle Plaine 2026 Mitigation Action Status CUD 0 0 0 Ongoing Ongoing b-0 0 0 0 Est. Cost $2,000 0 O 0 0 If) VT 0 O 0 0 Ln Eft $2,000 Possible Funding Cnty/City/Twp Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Public Health Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S. Sh d d '. IN H I.. �O O M O O N N ,..:SO N on O O N N ,IDO N M O O N N ,E, c, N M O O N N F� W a. VI w c.,1 w cn w 4' i O 0. Medium Medium Medium Mitigation Action Assist citizens to develop emergency preparedness, response and recovery plans. Train and equip 1st responders for search and rescue missions. Train and equip 1st responders to respond to mass -casualty events. Train 1st responders and community officials on the National Incident Mgmt. System. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards #k c -I N M d 2026 Mitigation Action Status In Progress Deferred Deferred Deferred 1 Est. Cost 0 0 0 O O Ln '04 0 0 0 O O in EA 0 0 0 O O d SA O 0 O N -,n- Possible Funding Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/Education Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Departments Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Red Cross; Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; Local School Districts, City Police Departments CI, Ste.. O O V7 L SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh �d d y E [� w N OM O O N NI N OM 0 0 NI NI N OM O O NI NI N OM O O NI NI CU Fw a. o. a a, c, -, w Priority Medium o O a Medium o O a Mitigation Action Obtain & install emergency generators or "pigtails" for critical government facilities and fuel depots. Assist non -governmental critical facilities to obtain emergency generators and/or pigtails. Obtain funding to add disaster shelters as necessary. Assist schools to implement a disaster phone line. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards u) kO h CO aA as N 2026 Mitigation Action Status t. J-14) V Deferred w O W w V Est. Cost O O 0 N iR O O 0 N Ea $52,000 O O 0 N En bD C "O C C w m a (41 D. County Utility Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County/Business Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; Shakopee Public Utility Commission; New Prague Utilities Commission; Minnesota Valley Electric CO-OP Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Scott County EM, Scott CountyAdmin; City Police Depts; City Admins Scott County EM, City Police Depts y C O Oe Vl V n: a m O. L. Z v z m SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh ce vi V n: a, m O. c.i z cn z � m cn . m E E E H,.h 4.)o N M 00 N N ,1)o N M 00 N N ,o o N M 00 N N co 0 N M 00 N N d O. H rn W W O. Cl) W cn W Priority O o a o a Medium O a Mitigation Action Assist utilities in developing restoration and mitigation plans. Assist businesses, schools, the special needs population and public facilities to post evacuation routes. Obtain funds for critical government departments to develop Continuity of Operations Plans. Assist businesses to develop Business Continuity Plans. Hazard N .O L N CO x 77,1 All Hazards All Hazards N .0 s_. O N CO O O M d N N ° 0 C Possible Funding Responsible Agencies Jurisdictions cu L O O. C_0 0 N M 0 0 N N Assist communities in W All Hazards N iA <0 0 N M 0 0 N N W All Hazards 7-1 2026 Mitigation Action Status I Deferred 0 0 bA 0 O Est. Cost O 0 O N 4R O 0 O N- b4 Possible Funding County/City Budget, Grants County/City Budget Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police depts Scott County EM; Scott County Public Works; City Police Departments; City Public Works (n 0 •t y •L R SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d d E f4 [-. W' l0 O N M O O N N ,L O N M O O N N CU 0. H L4 w Priority Medium by x Mitigation Action Assist critical sites to develop and provide an emergency plan to Scott County Emergency Management. Install new warning sirens in new developments rural townships and replace older sirens. Hazard All Hazards V1 C N N M 1$ S. c I CO c -I 2026 Mitigation Action Status In Progress Ongoing 0 O M Est. Cost O O O N 4H O O O d' iA O O O N -A O 0 0 N `I EA Possible Funding County/City Budget County/City Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget Cnty/City Budget Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh [-w w NJ N O O N N N OM O O N N N OM 0 0 NI N N OM 0 0 N N F a.a. LT -1 w L a. Medium 0 a t)A x Medium Mitigation Action Educate public on how to sign up for CodeRED. Proactively determine policies/process for post disaster FEMA response and mitigation applications. Distribute safe room/shelter in place information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Train & equip 1st responders to respond to high wind events. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms 1k O, .--i CO N d N 0 M 2026 Mitigation Action Status In Progress Deferred In Progress In Progress Est. Cost O O O CO Vi Cc O O 0 O IM e» O O O N H3 O O O N 4H Possible Funding County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Grants County Budget County/Dept Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts; Scott County Public Works, City Public Works; City Scott County EM, City Police Depts; City Admin Scott County EM, City Police Depts; City Administrations Scott County Public Health; Scott County Health & Human Services (,) 0 t N • L SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh . d £J [r w O NI M O O N NI N O N M O O N N N O NI M O O N N O N M NI O O NI NI CU t L O G. 7 V x Medium x Mitigation Action Develop a debris clearance program that can be utilized countywide. Obtain funding to build mobile home community storm shelters. Adopt & enforce mobile home tie down and skirting legislation. Identify special needs populations that rely on electricity for medical equipment. Hazard Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms u c- co N M M co n co r— 2026 Mitigation Action Status In Progress In Progress In Progress Est. Cost O co O - ER O o 0 N 4H $2,000,000 Possible Funding Cnty/City/Emergency Management/Public Health budget County/Dept Budget County & City Budgets, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts, Local School Districts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts City Administrations I_ Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh . cu £J . [� w NI O N M 0 0 N N kl,NI O N M O O NI NI O N CO O O N N a a a Priority E 7 L a - Medium Mitigation Action Educate public on how to stay safe during storms and promote the use of emergency kits and 72 -hour shelter -in - place kits Distribute flood preparedness and response information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Obtain funding to retrofit, elevate or relocate repetitive flooding structures in flood plains Hazard Summer Storms, Winter Storms Flooding Flooding # M d' d' bA a 2026 Mitigation Action L Status ti N C O n, C Est. Cost O 0 0 O N fsi Possible Funding County/City Budget Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County Public Works; City Public Works, Scott County Soil & Water Conservation District; Local Watershed Districts H CK vi o a ae.a N V Z V H O Li L/) W V, d d 5 8 f4 E. 6h. o N M o O N N d F Priority b0 .,- Mitigation Action Obtain equipment to mitigate flooding on bridges, culverts, and roads. Hazard b.0 C "C O O C7. t\ # d 2026 Mitigation Action Status C o n In Progress In Progress tX C z o tx C 0 Est. Cost O o Iri ER O O o O ~ ER 0 o N EA O O o O EA Possible Funding aa ' ,9 Ur._,,--. vi N C C 'C O C V CO County Budget, Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County Soil & Water Conservation District; Scott County Watershed Districts, SC, SMSC, BP, CR, City Public Works; EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Scott County Planning & Resource Management Division; City Planning Divisions Scott Watershed Mgmt. Organization Scott County EM, Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County EM; Scott County Public Health Scott County EM; City EM;S hakopee Public Utility Commission; New Prague Public Utilities; Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh CC vi V a a °n a V Z -, v, z VV, W vVi v d EE F.w so o NI M NI NI ,.0 O N M o 0 00 00 00 NI NI VS o NI Cr) NI NI 4.)O NI M NI N C zu F a a 71 cn w en w o 0- C on x s on x Mitigation Action Perform a study of the feasibility of community waterways flood control Work with local units of government to insure completion of local flooding risk projects. Identify citizens subject to suffering from extreme temperatures. Create a Power Outage Policy for critical facilities. Hazard I � Ccu O O CL Flooding Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold C 0 o a.)�, -C k k O W W V CO N 0-,O 2026 Mitigation Action Status Ongoing cc .6 cc O 0 In Progress Ongoing Est. Cost $4,000 0 0 O O' O N -69 - co O NI 69- c c O 69- Possible Funding County/City/ Emergency Management/Public Health budget County/City Budget County/State Budget, Grants County/City Budget Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts ; Scott County Public Health Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Departments Scott County EM; City Fire Depts City Fire Departments co, 0 O U .O H 7 SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S. Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, 1, NP, PL, S, Sh E'. F+ O w ,D c N M O O N N c N M O O N N O N M O O N N ,,I)O N M O O N N CI) a c..) a. cc z Priority N Medium a Mitigation Action Educate the public on the dangers of extreme temperatures, particularly outdoor workers and kids playing sports. Create cooling/warming shelters for vulnerable populations. Distribute wildfire awareness and preparedness information to schools and the public. Provide rural vegetation management educational information. Hazard Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Wildfires Wildfires it 6, ,0 O L. M N. d' N. 2026 Mitigation Action Status 00 co 0 0 cc 0 0 tat 0 0 In Progress Ongoing Est. Cost c 0 O N 4H c 0 O d,' c-1 .--1 c 0 O N iR c 0 O N If iA Possible Funding County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget Grants Responsible Agencies City Fire Depts City Fire Departments; Scott County Planning & Resource Management Division City Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Fire Depts Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d E 0O+ E. fG w 'co N M O O N N 'c O N M 0 0 N N 'co N M 0 0 N1 N 'co N on O O N N d G H 0.. Lz] O. (.n Ls] 4, C, O f•Y bA O 6 7 Medium 0 ,- Mitigation Action Complete proactive life safety inspections of high density housing. Adopt Appendix H of the MN Fire Code to eliminate BBQ grills on balconies and patios of structures with 3 or more units. Complete Fire Prevention Programs in schools and adult assisted living facilities. Assist in obtaining a fire education -training trailer for the jurisdiction. Hazard Wildfires, Structure Fires Wildfires, Structure Fires Wildfires, Structure Fires Structure Fires it ‘.0 N. N. N. CO N. C, N. Possible Funding Responsible Agencies Jurisdictions d E H w Gl H O Li Mitigation Action O 2 Li ts3 U •w Lii O 75 o N M O O N N Ln ao U L O a' O = a y aj O n 0 • E a L Y 5 o o C d 3 O a U 0 Lii Lii ci w In Progress Deferred Ongoing O O O O O O O O O O N ts3 N E N Eh Cnty/City/Dept Budget Grants County Budget W 14 0. O a Ca N a b0 V W Scott County EM; City Fire Depts Scott County Zoning; Scott County Planning & Resource Management; City Planning Departments Scott County EM; City Police Depts SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh 515 o NI o NI c N M N M N M O O O O O O NI NI NI NI NI NI CI) W 0. W 0. Medium ao Medium Obtain hazmat containment equipment for water, roads, and railroads. Adopt & enforce hazardous materials site building setback legislation. Distribute terrorism preparedness and awareness information to schools and the public. Hazardous Materials Hazardous Materials Terrorism CO O, O coO O .ti ao O L' csi O N a+ O O V Possible Funding N County/Dept Budget QJ I- Li Ca County/Dept Budget Responsible Agencies Jurisdictions NI N M co co N NI NI o NI M O O NI NI O O a O O a Mitigation Action Li U H Post terrorism and bomb .o Li O • O 5 .2 N • 'O ti g U b0 (Li• u. U a G O U F N O N EA - Li N b0 O Li O N N M N N NI NI W x 510 o NI co O O N N a a a G N o '0) N O co y, K Cl.) •5 , Li E G 6 L s b0 Li o a o a w -O a S ti O U H 2026 Mitigation Action Status Deferred t13t:11)tOD 0 bq O 0 tCCD O 0 b =D O C,.0b.0N 0 WD O Ongoing o d dB O p. O U Est. Cost O 0 0 N' n 0 0 0 G in 4.4 0 00 G in0 +A- O 00 .r $75,000 0 00 O 0 vi H3 O O O 0 0 EF O O O O " Y Possible Funding I � County/Dept Budget I � City/Dept Budget, Grants City/Dept Budget, Grants I � County/City Department Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants I � County, Tribal, & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police Depts. Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County EM; City Police Depts Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Departments Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Departments County & City Public Works Departments County and City IT Departments County and City Public Works H C O U .O H SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S. Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, 1, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, 1, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d d �'r+ f4 F ,� ,C,O N M O O N Ni O N M O O NI NI ,I,O NI M O O NI NI ,e,O NI co 0 0 NI NI �O O NI M O O NI Ni 4D O NI M 0 0 Ni Ni ,IDO NI M 0 0 NI NI ,I,O NI Cr) O O N Ni CD F LL W W n. 0. V7 a. W 4' F, D. E E x Medium x x x x Medium Mitigation Action Develop evacuation plans for identified terrorism targets. Replace malfunctioning or old warning sirens Provide back-up power sources to all sirens and warning systems Ensure an adequate number of sand bags and sand are on hand for flood prone areas of the county Purchase needed flood equipment including pumps and generators Redesign bridges that contribute to flooding by improving the flow of water and ice under/through the bridges Detect and contain 100% of any malicious activity, including virus and malware on all infrastructure. Maintain contracts with private sources for temporary internet access Purchase signage that can be used to direct the public during times of emergency Hazard Terrorism Summer Storms Summer Storms ti) O 0 0 w Flooding Flooding Cyber Security All Hazards it in O - N O - co O .-y O .-i - .-I .-I .-y N .--i .ti on .--I .ti 'O H - 2026 Mitigation Action Status o � O v o. E v `o t O 0 to 0 0 bC 0 Est. Cost $25,000 0 0 0 c d 4.4 0 O 0 o .-I ss 0 OO 0 0 O Lii fn 0 O O 0 O v, Possible Funding County & City Budget, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants Private partner budgets, Grants City, County, & Tribal Budgets, Grants if N N a. 07 Z N a, c7 Responsible Agencies County & City GIS, Scott County EM Sheriff's Office, City Police Departments Scott County GIS; Shakopee Public Utilities; New Prague Utility Commission; Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Departments Scott County Public Works, City Public Works, Shakopee Public Utility Commission, New Prague Utility Commission, Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative cn ° u 'O IA Z, .� Belle Plaine, Jordan, Scott County SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Belle Plaine, Jordan, New Prague, Shakopee, Scott County SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh c 0 a; c z a, o a. c N a v a tnx L -.,! o s-. UU = .-, a, un cn 8 8 fC w o N M O O NI NI vo N M O O NI NI ,, ua NI NI O O NI NI .li o N CO O O NI N '0o NI M O O NI NI 47 F a. a. C/] Wci7 a. a. 4' •. R. �t�n 0 stn 0 0 a Haan 0 0 0 0 Mitigation Action Identify homes, facilities, and/or businesses subject to potential landslides. Create emergency Trauma Kits for responders in order to be prepared to quickly deploy & respond to various emergencies Assist Shakopee Public Utilities, New Prague Utility Commission, & Minnesota Valley Electric with the creation of power outage maps Raise roadways that are historically prone to flooding Identify electric lines which have a history of repetitive failures in severe weather and bury those lines Hazard Landslide All Hazards En 'G N N 0 0 Flooding cA "0 z. N N 0 0 it O NI c -I c -I NI c -I N N a -I NI M a -I d" M .-y fgation Actions for Elko New Market 2026 Mitigation Action Status � I Ongoing o a 0 o v Cl. v Complete Est. Cost 0 0 0 N 49- 0 0 CO O IC) ER O O 0 O ril 49- $2,000 Possible Funding Scott County Cnt Ci Tw EM; City Police & y/ ty/ p Fire Depts Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Public Health Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts V) 0 O t 10 L SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Time - frame NO CO N M O O N N (D O N M CO CO N N NO c, N M CO CO N N ND O N M CO CO N N C.) 7a, F w R. VI L4 cn w cn w Priority Assist citizens to develop emergency preparedness, High response and recovery plans. Medium Medium Medium Mitigation Action Train and equip 1st responders for search and rescue missions. Train and equip 1st responders to respond to mass -casualty events. Train 1st responders and community officials on the National Incident Mgmt. System. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards Number c -I N M d' 2026 Mitigation Action Status Complete Deferred Deferred Deferred Est. Cost O 0 0 O' O LC) Y3 0 0 0 O O LC) iA 0 O 0 O O .1`' iR 0 CO O N 4/9 Possible Funding Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/Education Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Departments Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Red Cross; Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Local School Districts 0 O t 10 L SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh dmo+ d i F Sr O N M O O N N kL O N en O O N N QS, O N en O O N N O N M O O N N 6) a. F R. w a a c rn w Priority C 'a a° Medium a° Mitigation Action Obtain & install emergency generators or "pigtails" for critical government facilities and fuel depots. Assist non -governmental critical facilities to obtain emergency generators and/or pigtails. Obtain funding to add disaster shelters as necessary. Assist schools to implement a disaster phone line. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards it in us, L� W 2026 Mitigation Action Status w a) Ca w a) Ca Deferred -a w v Ca Deferred an o b0 O Est. Cost O O O N R O O O N - 0 O N ER O O O N EA O O .N-1 4R $2,000 Possible Funding C.J > N o ac V W County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County/Business Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; Shakopee Public Utility Commission; New Prague Utilities Commission; Minnesota Valley Electric CO-OP Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Scott County EM, Scott County Admin; City Police Depts; City Admin Scott County EM, Scott County Admin; City Admin Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts H C o 'i-, a: z Z r v cn W vi V) CJ 0. a: zz ZLi‘ ' cn W vi V] CJ O. SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh a: z Z ,.='O cn cn W vi V] t) 0. SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d d 5' o CO W CO O N M CO CO N N CO O N M CO CO N N CO CO N CO CO CO N N CO CO N M CO CO N N CO CO N CO CO CO N N CO CO N CO CO CO N N N CL >, V/) Cl) W a Cl') Cl) CA Cl) Cl) CA Cl) ts ;, 0 3 3 0 o 3 Medium 0 0 Mitigation Action Assist utilities in developing restoration and mitigation plans. Assist businesses, schools, the special needs population and public facilities to post evacuation routes. Obtain funds for critical government departments to develop Continuity of Operations Plans. Assist businesses to develop Business Continuity Plans. Assist communities in developing strategies to prevent loss of public records. Ensure mutual aid, shelter, response, mass casualty & recovery agreements are current. Hazard A CO 3-. N N x V) - ; . ra N N z All Hazards Vl CO Y. N N x All Hazards All Hazards it CO - M - d' - U') - CO - 2026 Mitigation Action Status Deferred Ongoing In Progress Ongoing z ao o v v q In Progress Deferred In Progress Est. Cost 0 O Ni 4R O O Lli {A O O O N V3 O O O d' f!-} O O O N ER 0 O .-i Vi O O O W H7 O O O O O LC) ER O O O N -64 Possible Funding Scott County EM; Scott County Public Works; City County/City Budget, Police Depts, City Public Grants Works County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget County/City Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget Cnty/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Grants County Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts City Public Works Departments Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Works, City Public Works; Scott County EM; City Police Depts City Administrations Scott County EM; City Police Depts City Administrations Scott County EM, Scott County Admin; City In C, o u 7 SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh p.; a z cn W vi (.2CC-1 SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d d r CO E. ,,, Assist critical sites to 2026 develop and provide an Medium ES 2030 emergency plan to the EMA. (N 0 N M O O N N ssS(N o N M O O N N ‘1.10 N M O O N N l0 O NI M O O N N sl,(N o N M O O N N l0 o NI M O O N N l0 O NI M O O N N (N o N M O O N N N p, >, w w a. ° LL a, w a a, Priority talD3 x Medium a° x E ve. E =b17 Medium Mitigation Action Install new warning sirens in new developments rural townships and replace older sirens. Educate public on how to sign up for CodeRED. Proactively determine policies/process for post disaster FEMA response and mitigation applications. Distribute safe room/shelter in place information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Train & equip 1st responders to respond to high wind events. Develop a debris clearance program that can be utilized countywide. Obtain funding to build mobile home community storm shelters. Adopt & enforce mobile home tie down and skirting legislation. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards Summer Storms, Winter Storms o 0 vD ci v Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter # N- c -I co c -I Q, e-1 M NI d' NI O M c-1 CO NI M M Cr) 2026 Mitigation Action Status Storms Administrations In Progress v s. v N Q In Progress In Progress In Progress cil a) tap o Rte. Est. Cost o © N EA o 0 cN-I _ $4,000 o o Ni {R O p O Oo N NI O o o O 0 NI Vi Possible Funding County/Dept Budget City Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Emergency Management/Public Health budget County/Dept Budget County & City Budgets, Grants y., a) tu) .o O Pci U y 0 i.. V C7 Responsible Agencies Scott County Public Health; Scott County Health & Human Services Elko New Market Police Department; Elko New Market City Administration Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts, Local School Districts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts City Admin Scott County Public Works; City Public Works, Scott County Soil & Water Conservation District; Local Watershed Districts In 0 O u O •� r-. SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Z x o y., x m W SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh a; a: Z cn w vi vii V 4 d d .' CO E. 4-, l0 0 N Cr) o o N N s0 0 N Cr) o o N N l0 0 N Cr) o o N N l0 0 NI Cr) o o N N '0o N Cr) o o N N 'O o N Cr) o o N N N Haa O R. 1 f x _O x O -O '3 a 7 -O _O x Mitigation Action Identify special needs populations that rely on electricity for medical equipment. Install generator at the Elko New Market Police Department Headquarters Educate public on how to stay safe during storms and promote the use of emergency kits and 72 -hour shelter-inplace kits Distribute flood preparedness and response information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Obtain funding to retrofit, elevate or relocate repetitive flooding structures in flood plains Obtain equipment to mitigate flooding on bridges, culverts, and roads. Hazard Summer Storms, Winter Storms s, a G F 0 O O V] V] VI Summer Storms, Winter Storms Flooding Flooding bA '0 o 0 Cs. #k t, M CO M a, M d' d' ' d' S. d' 2026 Mitigation Action Status UdID o a. In Progress In Progress Ongoing 0 c o Ongoing In Progress Est. Cost 0 0 Lf) ER 0 0 O 0 0 N EA co 0 0 o 0 0 d' EA 0 0 0 0 O N Ef3 0 0 L.r NI Possible Funding County & City Budgets, Grants County Budget, Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Budget County/City/ Emergency Management/Public Health budget County/City Budget County/State Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County Soil & Water Conservation District; Scott County Watershed Districts, City Public Works; Scott County Planning & Resource Management Division; City Planning Divisions Scott Watershed Mgmt. Organization Scott County Emergency Management; Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County EM; Scott County Public Health Scott County EM; City EM; Shakopee Public Utility Commission; New Prague Public Utilities; Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Health Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Departments Scott County EM; City Fire Depts H o ., '- �^ a4 w " z r U C vL V 0. SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d d E, CO E. q-, l0 0 NI Cr) 0 0 NI NI l0 0 NI Cr) 0 0 NI NI lfl o NI Cr) 0 0 NI NI ,L o NI Cr) 0 0 NI NI o NI Cr) 0 0 NI NI l0 0 NI Cr) 0 0 NI NI 4:, o NI Cr) 0 0 NI NI Na. H o, _ c/5 W W CL., _ v1 R. Priority 7 ro a .z xb.C x 7 CD Medium a° Mitigation Action Perform a study of the feasibility of community waterways flood control Work with local units of government to insure completion of local flooding risk projects. Identify citizens subject to suffering from extreme temperatures. Create a Power Outage Policy for critical facilities. Educate the public on the dangers of extreme temperatures, particularly outdoor workers and kids playing sports. Create cooling/warming shelters for vulnerable populations. Distribute wildfire awareness and preparedness information to schools and the public. Hazard on Z o w Flooding Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold L � _ $k CO d' NI L11 L-, ,.O CO ,O Q, ‘0 O L. co L. bn O O 0 LO Possible Funding Jurisdictions O N M N NI NI Mitigation Action a z a O • O at N ro U U bn O o � U • 0 U U O clz a. O U r, 0On O O OD O 0 O O In Progress O O O NI O O d'''' O O O N County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants City Fire Departments City Fire Depts; Scott County Planning & Resource Management Division City Fire Departments SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Loo N Cr) O O NI NI Loo NI M O O NI NI Loo NI M O O NI NI a a w a to x 0 O � Medium Complete proactive life safety inspections of high density housing. Adopt Appendix H of the MN Fire Code to eliminate BBQ grills on balconies and patios of structures with 3 or more units. Complete Fire Prevention Programs in schools and adult assisted living facilities. Wildfires, Structure Fires Wildfires, Structure Fires Wildfires, Structure Fires Lo L\ N. L\ co L\ 2026 Mitigation Action Status an O O bn O O In Progress In Progress Deferred Est. Cost O O O Ni Lfl b4 0 O d 0 N tnT co O O NI Eh co O O i N R Possible Funding County/Dept Budget Grants County/Dept Budget Grants Cnty/City/Dept Budget Grants County Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Fire Depts Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Scott County EM; City Fire Depts Scott County Zoning; Scott County Planning & Resource Management; City Planning Departments Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Time - frame LO o NI M O O NI NI \O © NI M O O NI NI LO O NI CO O O NI NI LD O N CO O O NI NI F w v w a i OO n. a bA O Medium O a Mitigation Action Assist in obtaining a fire education -training trailer for the jurisdiction. Acquire and install six-inch water mains and hydrants communitywide. Obtain hazmat containment equipment for water, roads, and railroads. Adopt & enforce hazardous materials site building setback legislation. Hazard Structure Fires Structure Fires Hazardous Materials Hazardous Materials 1* CI,CO N. CO O, O, O, bn N 2026 Mitigation Action Status SC, SMSC, BP, CR, Scott County i Distribute terrorism preparedness 2026- EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh Cnty/Dept/BOE 100 Terrorism and awareness information to Medium PE 2030EM; City Police Budget $2,000 Ongoing schools and the public. Departments g Ongoing Deferred In Progress Est. Cost 0 O 0 N EA 0 O 0 N b4 co 0 0 N ER Possible Funding County/Dept Budget County/Dept Budget County/Dept Budget Responsible Agencies J Scott County EM; City Police Departments Scott County EM; City Police Departments Scott County EM; City Police Departments; Scott County GIS Jurisdictions J I SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Time - frame ,.O O N M O O N N s.O o N M O O N N LE, o N M O O N N CU a W a W a W a Priority Educate government officials, the special needs population, and Low schools on procedures for handling suspicious mail. 0 a on x Mitigation Action Post terrorism and bomb identification information in buildings and schools. Identify & distribute to appropriate officials potential terrorism targets information. Hazard Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism it c -I O .-y N O .ti M O .ti 2026 Mitigation Action Status In Progress cu t, cu � o ex 0 0 Deferred Est. Cost 0 o O C,1- O c-1 EA- 0 o co N {y4 co O O O ti) ER 0 O O O LC) EA Possible Funding County/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget City/Dept Budget, Grants City/Dept Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County Sheriff's Office; City Police Departments Scott County EM;City Police Depts. Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County EM; City Police Departments. y O t y L R SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, 1, NP, PL, S, Sh BP, CR, ENM, J, NP, PL, S, Sh BP, CR, ENM, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Time - frame ,.O O N M O O N N O N M O O N N O N M O O N N O N M O O N N a 0. tn W cn w cn w Priority Medium E o a) cA Medium Mitigation Action Fund/maintain a trained bomb dog and handler to serve the entire county. Develop evacuation plans for identified terrorism targets. Replace malfunctioning or old warning sirens Provide back-up power sources to all sirens and warning systems Hazard Terrorism Terrorism Summer Storms Summer Storms it d O .-y N O - C-. O .-a CO O .-I 2026 Mitigation Action Status o 0 o a 0 o o C 0 0 t w CI Est. Cost O O O ER 00 O Hi $5,000,000 O O O p O c -I Possible Funding County/City Department Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County, Tribal, & City Budgets, Grants Responsible Agencies Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts County & City Public Works Departments County and City IT Depts co, 0 t y L SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Time - frame vO O N M O O N N CD O N M O O N N ,..b O N M O O N N NC O N M O O N N CD a F 0.. a Q. Priority _a x _a un on to x x _a un x Mitigation Action Ensure an adequate number of sand bags and sand are on hand for flood prone areas of the county Purchase needed flood equipment including pumps and generators Redesign bridges that contribute to flooding by improving the flow of water and ice under/through the bridges Detect and contain 100% of any malicious activity, including virus and malware on all infrastructure. Maintain contracts with private sources for temporary internet access Hazard Flooding Flooding Flooding Cyber Security it O c-1 c -I .-I H rl N c-1 N M H c -I 2026 Mitigation Action Status Deferred Deferred v a E o Est. Cost I O O O O f{} $25,000 O O O O A Possible Funding County & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budget, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants Responsible Agencies County and City Public Works County & City GIS, Scott County EM Sheriff's Office, City Police Departments Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Belle Plaine, Jordan, Scott County SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh �v v cvE F 4L ,O O N M O O N N QE, O N M O O N N vO O N M O O N N a. F— W w W t' i 0. Medium to X Abp X Mitigation Action Purchase signage that can be used to direct the public during times of emergency Identify homes, facilities, and/or businesses subject to potential landslides. Create emergency Trauma Kits for responders in order to be prepared to quickly deploy & respond to various emergencies Hazard All Hazards Landslide All Hazards it 'O c-1 c -I: O N c-1 r -I N c -I 2026 Mitigation Action Status .oan ❑ a 0 an ❑ o WC 0 an c .o CZ 0 Est. Cost O O O 0 O bn- O o O 0 O o vi to O O O 0 O ul Possible Funding Private partner budgets, Grants City, County, & Tribal Budgets, Grants if s. ° Y L. fo a p; ° w c7 Responsible Agencies Scott County GIS; Shakopee Public Utilities; New Prague Utility Commission; Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Departments Scott County Public Works, City Public Works, Shakopee Public Utility Commission, New Prague Utility Commission, Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative H .. V .L Belle Plaine, Jordan, New Prague, Shakopee, Scott County SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh 0 0 7 .,1 z a> ° y, sue. CD X R ° CG ° C cn Time - frame QE, o N M O O N N ,o o N M O O N N o N CO O O N N CU p, �, a a Priority E - N - bA x E ° v Mitigation Action Assist Shakopee Public Utilities, New Prague Utility Commission, & Minnesota Valley Electric with the creation of power outage maps Raise roadways that are historically prone to flooding Identify electric lines which have a history of repetitive failures in severe weather and bury those lines Hazard All Hazards Flooding y s. a N CO x 1$ N N c -I N CO c -I d" CO c -I. ',cation Actions for J 2026 Mitigation Action Status Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing 0 0 O Est. Cost 0 0 O N -64 0 o O O In ER 0 O O O IM 64 $2,000 Possible Funding Scott County Cnty/City/Twp EM; City Police & Fire Depts Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Public Health Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts 0 0 t 10 H L O SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Time - frame %.O O N M 0 0 N N ' O N M 0 0 N N ,0 O N M O 0 N N k.0 O N M 0 0 N N V F W V7 N M Priority az 0 Medium Medium Medium Mitigation Action Assist citizens to develop emergency preparedness, response and recovery plans. Train and equip 1st responders for search and rescue missions. Train and equip 1st responders to respond to mass -casualty events. Train 1st responders and community officials on the National Incident Mgmt. System. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards F N CO d L Possible Funding U CL 0 b4 F V E' O 0 V co Jurisdictions F w F O Mitigation Action 'C in N N 0 7 0 U U s U U O I. U U ▪ O O U U 3.. U U U F,Jo. U U • U O b0 b0 vi 0 'O LfJ Deferred Deferred Deferred 0 O O O O LU EA 0 O O O O d iA O O o N t>4 Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/Education Budget, Grants Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Red Cross; Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; Local School Districts, City Police Depts SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh iD o vb o o N M 0 0 NI N M 0 0 N M 0 0 N N N N N NI a. L LT7 0 0 Medium 0 0 a a Assist non -governmental critical facilities to obtain emergency generators and/or pigtails. Obtain funding to add disaster shelters as necessary. Assist schools to implement a disaster phone line. All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards aA ccS 2026 Mitigation Action Status Deferred Deferred C) w CD Deferred Deferred Ongoing { Deferred I � 0 o bA 0 Est. Cost 0 O O N Ni-1 0 O O N EFT o O ...9 n O O O Ni.N-1 49- CD o O VT 0 O O N 49- 0 O .N En- $75,000 Possible Funding County Utility Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County/Business Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget County/City Budget, Grants County/City Budget Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; Shakopee Public Utility Commission; New Prague Utilities Commission; Minnesota Valley Electric CO-OP Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Scott County EM, Scott County Administration; City Police Depts; City Administration Scott County EM, City Police Departments Scott County EM, Scott County Admin; City Admin Scott County EM; City Police Depts; City Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police Departments Scott County EM; Scott County Public Works; City Police Depts; City Public Works (,) 0 t (/) L 3 SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, I, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Q. N Ei t9 H L., NI O N M O O NI NI NI O N M O 0' NI NI O NI M O O NI NI LIS O NI M O O NI NI O NI M O O NI NI O NI M O O NI N LIS O NI en O O NI NI s.b O NI en O O NI NI V rL ,>s F V7 W LL] 0, V] W VI W V) W V7 W V] W V) W Medium Mitigation Action Assist utilities in developing restoration and mitigation plans. Assist businesses, schools, the special needs population and public facilities to post evacuation routes. Obtain funds for critical government departments to develop Continuity of Operations Plans. Assist businesses to develop Business Continuity Plans. Assist communities in developing strategies to prevent loss of public records. Ensure mutual aid, shelter, response, mass casualty & recovery agreements are current. Assist critical sites to develop and provide an emergency plan to the EMA. Install new warning sirens in new developments rural townships and replace older sirens. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards O co d' Ln 'O l� CO 2026 Mitigation Action Status I I I I I I I I I I SC, SMSC, BP, Educate public on how to 2026- CR, EMN, J, NP, Scott County EM, City Police Depts, City Fire County/City In 19 All Hazards sign up for CodeRED. Medium PE 2030 PL, S, Sh Depts Budget $2,000 Progress CD o bq o CZ 0 o 0 C Deferred In Progress Deferred In Progress In Progress Est. Cost 0 0 O d ER 0 0 o Si -En 0 0 O Vi 0 0 O OJ b4 0 0 0 O ,..r)EA Ea 0 0 O N 0 0 O N ER Possible Funding County/City Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget Cnty/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Grants County Budget County/Dept Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM, Scott County Public Works, City Public Works; City Police Depts, City Fire Depts Scott County EM, City Police Depts; City Administrations Scott County EM, City Police Depts; City Administrations Scott County Public Health; Scott County Health & Human Services (n O t MI N L R SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, I, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d a) t9 E:,,. l0 O N M 00 NI NI l0 c, N M 00 NI NI l0 O NI M 00 NI NI l0 O NI M 00 NI NI l0 O NI M 00 NI NI l0 r NI M 00 NI NI l0 O NI M 00 NI NI d T°" F a, W a. _ v7 v) 0.. 4" 6. .- n o a abn x E 7 C E C C abtn x E 7 C aazn x Mitigation Action Proactively determine policies/process for post - disaster FEMA response and mitigation applications. Distribute safe room/shelter in place information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Train & equip 1 responders to respond to high wind events. Develop a debris clearance program that can be utilized countywide. Obtain funding to build mobile home community storm shelters. Adopt & enforce mobile home tie down and skirting legislation. Identify special needs populations that rely on electricity for medical equipment. Hazard All Hazards I. v vi L y SSS E " E " C O 5 0 cn e. in Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms k co NI .t N O M c -I M N M M M L� M 2026 Mitigation Action Status In Progress LI v 0 L. a. In Progress In Progress y v) 0 0 0 L. a. In Progress In Progress Ongoing Est. Cost 0 O O iR 0 O O N EA $2,000,000 O 0 O d O N EH 0 O O N 64 0 O. o O 0 N Ef) 0 44 Possible Funding Cnty/City/Emergency Management/Public Health budget County/Dept Budget County & City Budgets, Grants County/City Budget Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County Budget, Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Local School Districts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts City Administrations Scott County Public Works; City Public Works, Scott County Soil & Water Conservation District; Local Watershed Districts Scott County Soil & Water Conservation District; Scott County Watershed Districts, City Public Works; Scott County Planning & Resource Management Division; City Planning Divisions Scott Watershed Mgmt. Organization Scott County Emergency Management, Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County Emergency Management; Scott County Public Health Scott County EM; City EM; Shakopee Public Utility Commission; New Prague Public Utilities; Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative Cl O t MI Cl L R SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d N Ei t9 E: , g. LO O N co 0 0 NI NI l0 O N co 0 0 NI NI NI O N en 0 0 NI NI O NI en 0 0 NI NI NI O N co 0 0 NI N O NI M 0 0 NI NI O NI en 0 0 NI NI ksbNI O N co 0 0 NI NI d ai F a a a _ a N W W `o 0 -c 0 -a O 0 0 = ac Mitigation Action Educate public on how to stay safe during storms and promote the use of emergency kits and 72 - hour shelter-inplace kits Distribute flood preparedness and response information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Obtain funding to retrofit, elevate or relocate repetitive flooding structures in flood plains Obtain equipment to mitigate flooding on bridges, culverts, and roads. Perform a study of the feasibility of community waterways flood control Work with local units of government to insure completion of local flooding risk projects. Identify citizens subject to suffering from extreme temperatures. Create a Power Outage Policy for critical facilities. Hazard Summer Storms, Winter Storms Lam ' o w Flooding Flooding Flooding Flooding Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold V V -a w x w u M d' n N NI url n g.0 O g.0 2026 Mitigation Action Status an 0 � 0 Ongoing In Progress c 0 0 an o an 0 an a � 0 In Progress an 0 � 0 In Progress Est. Cost 0 0 71 ER 0 0 0 d 0 N ER $25,000 0 0 ,.p ER 0 0 ,N-1 ER 0 0 ,t' ER 0 0 ,N-1 {/} 0 0 N Y3 $2,000,000 Possible Funding County/City/ Emergency Management/Public Health budget County/City Budget County/State Budget, Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget Grants County/Dept Budget Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Health Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Departments Scott County EM; City Fire Depts City Fire Departments City Fire Departments City Fire Departments; Scott County Planning & Resource Management Division City Fire Departments Scott County EM; City Fire Depts Scott County Public Works; City Public Works In O 10 N L R SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d N EE t7 E„,h N O N M 00 NI NI NI O N M 00 NI NI O NI co O o NI NI LES 0 NI co 00 NI NI s'D 0 NI M 00 NI NI siD 0 NI M 00 NI NI ,ID 0 NI M 00 NI NI 0 NI M 00 NI NI ,ID O NI co o O NI NI E-, w a. z a w w w l `o a 0 ,.0 0 -0 0 3 � Mitigation Action Educate the public on the dangers of extreme temperatures, particularly outdoor workers and kids playing sports. Create cooling/warming shelters for vulnerable populations. Distribute wildfire awareness and preparedness information to schools and the public. Provide rural vegetation management educational information. Complete proactive life safety inspections of high density housing. Adopt Appendix H of the MN Fire Code to eliminate BBQ grills on balconies and patios of structures with 3 or more units. Complete Fire Prevention Programs in schools and adult assisted living facilities. Assist in obtaining a fire education -training trailer for the jurisdiction. Acquire and install six- inch water mains and Hazard 0 0 0 -a 'R'xwu Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold , 0E' a vi a Wildfires, Structure Fires vi0 0 0 a'' a N Ris, Wildfires, Structure Fires Structure Fires Structure Fires lb O, 0 O n M n d' n ,O N. s. N. CO N. 0, N. c-1 CO 2026 Mitigation Action Status II hydrants communitywide. In Progress Deferred be O 0 O 0 be G 0 be a Deferred In Progress In Progress Deferred CZ O 0 C a Est. Cost 00 0 O CV 0 0 O N Er4 0 0 O N ER 0 0 O N ER 0 0 O N b4 0 0 O N EA 0 0 0 CVO O .I -DA- 0 0 N En 0 0 O L.CD Possible Funding Cnty/City/Dept Budget Grants County Budget Cnty/Dept/BOE Budget County/Dept Budget County/Dept Budget County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget City/Dept Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Fire Depts Scott County Zoning; Scott County Planning & Resource Management; City Planning Departments Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County GIS Scott County Sheriff's Office; City Police Departments Scott County EM; City Police Depts. Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County Public Works, City Public Works COD O H 70 N L SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh BP, CR, ENM, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d N Ei t9 E: , D. N O N on 0 0 N N N O N M 0 0 N N N O N en 0 0 N N N O N on 0 0 N N N O N M 0 0 N N N O N M 0 o N N v'DN O N M O o N N Ns.b O N M 0 0 N N v'DN O N co 0 0 N N d rL F M wO.. Lt7 a. Ls7 0. Ls7 a, Lc] a, LL V)V) W La o 0.). a a 3 a b x Medium be x Mitigation Action Obtain hazmat containment equipment for water, roads, and railroads. Adopt & enforce hazardous materials site building setback legislation. Distribute terrorism preparedness and awareness information to schools and the public. Educate government officials, the special needs population, and schools on procedures for handling suspicious mail. Post terrorism and bomb identification information in buildings and schools. Identify & distribute to appropriate officials potential terrorism targets information. Fund/maintain a trained bomb dog and handler to serve the entire county. Develop evacuation plans for identified terrorism targets. Replace malfunctioning or old warning sirens Hazard Hazardous Materials Hazardous Materials Terrorism 0 s. L H F Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Summer Storms #k a, a, O O ti HI O ti N O ti M O ti d' O ti Ln O .--i L� O ti 2026 Mitigation Action Status i Provide back-up power BP, CR, ENM, Summer 2026- City/Dept Budget, 108 sources to all sirens and Medium ES J, NP, PL, S, Sh Scott County EM; City Police Depts Grants $50,000 Deferred Storms 2030 warning systems In Progress In Progress ao a) c.) N v a a. Deferred b4 o o b4 0 Est. Cost 0 O Lf1 iA $75,000 0 0 O CD O 'Si En - O 0 0 O CD- O .--1 e» o O a Ln r-1 is CD 0 O Ln N VT Possible Funding County/City Department Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County, Tribal, & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts County & City Public Works Departments County and City IT Depts County and City Public Works County & City GIS, Scott County EM (n ❑ O �z� 'y^ = SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh 0 0:z v] [a] vi V CC —i v] U 0. 0. 0:z ��z v v, w i ci CC .a vi U 0. SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Belle Plaine, Jordan, Scott County d N t9 E, g. ‘O O N M 00 N N l0 O N M 00 N N l0 O N co 00 N N l0 O N M 00 N N l0 O N CO 00 N N l0 O N M 00 N N d F o. o. _ v] 0.. W LL, t' L n. b.c bD x bb. bA x 0 o cu two Mitigation Action Ensure an adequate number of sand bags and sand are on hand for flood prone areas of the county Purchase needed flood equipment including pumps and generators Redesign bridges that contribute to flooding by improving the flow of water and ice under/through the bridges Detect and contain 100% of any malicious activity, including virus and malware on all infrastructure. Maintain contracts with private sources for temporary interne t access Purchase signage that can be used to direct the public during times of emergency Identify homes, facilities, and/or businesses subject to potential landslides. Hazard Flooding Flooding w L N u cn All Hazards Landslide O c -I .--I c-1 N c-1 M c-1 gg0 c-1 O N 2026 Mitigation Action Status an 0 o t o bA - � C 0 to 0 o an 0 Ongoing an 0 0 an 0 Est. Cost 0 0 0 0 7, n 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 Ln on- $5,000,000 0 0 0 0 o on on- Possible Funding County & City Budgets, Grants Private partner budgets, Grants Jordan City Budget, Grants; Valley Green Mobile Home Park City, County, & Tribal Budgets, Grants Private Partners, Grants Responsible Agencies Sheriff's Office, City Police Departments Scott County GIS; Shakopee Public Utilities; New Prague Utility Commission; Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative Jordan Public Works, Jordan City Admin Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts Scott County Public Works, City Public Works, Shakopee Public Utility Commission, New Prague Utility Commission, Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative (/) O N SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh C a 7 3 Z v o - N C C ,C Jordan SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Belle Plaine, Jordan, New Prague, Shakopee, Scott County d N E E t9 E-. ,h' vb o N M 00 N N l0 0 N on 00 N N l0 o N on 00 N N 0 NI M N 0 0 N N 0 siDNI on 00 N N d a F n a a w t' L O 6. =tO x E 7 v bA x an x C v Mitigation Action Create emergency Trauma Kits for All Hazards responders in order to be prepared to quickly deploy & respond to various emergencies Assist Shakopee Public Utilities, New Prague Utility Commission, & Minnesota Valley Electric with the creation of power outage maps Install larger culvert(s) within Valley Green Mobile Home Park to increase drainage during flooding Raise roadways that are historically prone to flooding Identify electric lines which have a history of repetitive failures in severe weather and bury those lines Hazard Lt 'O L-. on N N O Flooding Flooding All Hazards it c -I N c -I N N .-y 0 on c -I N on c -I d on c -I ',cation Actions for New Pr Possible Funding Jurisdictions Mitigation Action EA - NI O O N M O O N N All Hazards CZ b Ongoing CZ CZ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O N EA E.O Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Public Health Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh 'O O \O o lD O N M N M N CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N CO CO CO w w w Medium Medium Medium Train and equip 1st responders for search and rescue missions. Train and equip 1st responders to respond to mass -casualty events. Train 1st responders and community officials on the National Incident Mgmt. System. All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards N CO d' 2026 Mitigation Action Status In Progress Deferred Deferred Deferred Est. Cost 0 o 0 O O b9 o d 0 O O L.& d o o O O d' -ER O O O csi .9- Possible Funding Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/Education Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Local School Districts Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d d y czE H W vO O NI en O O N N LE,NI O N en O O N N NO O NI M O O N N NO O NI M O O N N d a F a a w Jr O Om 7 'O Medium Mitigation Action Obtain & install emergency generators or "pigtails" for critical government facilities and fuel depots. Assist non -governmental critical facilities to obtain emergency generators and/or pigtails. Obtain funding to add disaster shelters as necessary. Assist schools to implement a disaster phone line. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards 2026 Mitigation Action L Status I I I I I I I SC, SMSC, BP, Scott County EM; Shakopee Public Utility Assist utilities in 2026- CR, EMN, J, NP, Commission; New Prague Utilities County Utility 9 All Hazards developing restoration Low ES $2,000 Deferred 2030 PL, S, Sh Commission; Minnesota Valley Electric Budget, Grants and mitigation plans. CO-OP Ongoing V ,c2..) N Deferred Deferred Ongoing O Eil N Ongoing Est. Cost C C N EA $52,000 Cco C N iA co ,N-1 Y) C C N {A p co ,N-1 Y3 $75,000 Possible Funding County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County/Business Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget County/City Budget, Grants County/City Budget Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Scott County EM, Scott County Admin; City Police Depts; City Administration Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM, Scott County Admin; City Admin Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County Emergency Management; Scott County Public Works; City Police Departments; City Public Works (n g � N 'y^ SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh az CO N cn w vi v] CO O. SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d d .' CO E ,. NI C NI M o N N NI C NI M o N NI NI co NI M o NI NI co N M o NI NI NI C NI Cr) o NI NI iD © N M o NI NI N C NI M o NI NI N Q, >, LL] a, V) w V) W V) W V) W V) W V) W L o o Mitigation Action Assist businesses, schools, the special needs population and public facilities to post evacuation routes. Obtain funds for critical government departments to develop Continuity of Operations Plans. Assist businesses to develop Business Continuity Plans. Assist communities in developing strategies to prevent loss of public records. Ensure mutual aid, shelter, response, mass casualty & recovery agreements are current. Assist critical sites to develop and provide an emergency plan to the EMA. Install new warning sirens in new developments rural townships and replace older sirens. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards N N Et All Hazards it,--I C M ,-I d' ,-I in ,--I ,--I N. ,-I co ,-I 2026 Mitigation Action Status I I I I I I I I I Educate public on how to 2026 -SC, SMSC, BP, 19 All Hazards sign up for CodeRED. Medium PE 2030 CR, EMN, J, NP, Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts County/City Budget $2,000 In Progress PL, S, Sh cc o o tic o an a cc 0 Ongoing In Progress Deferred In Progress In Progress In Progress Est. Cost 0 0 0 cl 44 0 0 0 N 4R 00 0 ti 4!} 0 0 0 W EFT 0 0 0 0 O If) R 0 0 0 N {f} 0 0 0 Ni En -4A 0 0 0 d' Possible Funding County/City Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget Cnty/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Grants County Budget County/Dept Budget Cnty/City/Emergency Management/Public Health budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Works Scott County EM; City Police Depts City Administrations Scott County EM; City Police Depts; City Administrations Scott County Public Health; Scott County Health & Human Services Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts (n O t 10 N L O SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d d CO E-. ,. kD © NI M 00 N N s.7 O N M 00 N N .1,O N M 00 N NI sO c, NI M 00 NI NI s.7 c, NI M 00 N N l7 © N M 00 N NI vi) c, NI M 00 NI NI c, NI MI CV CV N w V) w raw a, N .° n. o a c 0 Ic Ic a) c x Ic a) cc x Mitigation Action Proactively determine policies/process for postdisaster FEMA response and mitigation applications. Distribute safe room/shelter in place information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Train & equip 1st responders to respond to high wind events. Develop a debris clearance program that can be utilized countywide. Obtain funding to build mobile home community storm shelters. Adopt & enforce mobile home tie down and skirting legislation. Identify special needs populations that rely on electricity for medical equipment. Educate public on how to stay safe during storms and promote the use of emergency kits and 72 - hour shelter-inplace kits Hazard All Hazards Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms M N N NI o M en M N M M M t ---.it M en 2026 Mitigation Action Status N En N L. O O CY In Progress In Progress In Progress In Progress In Progress Ongoing an O en 0 Est. Cost O O O N 4H $2,000,000 O O O O N {A O C O to 4R O O O O0 {-R O O O N Hi OO O O0 Vi O O O d' V3 Possible Funding County/Dept Budget County & City Budgets, Grants County/City Budget Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County Budget, Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Budget County/City/ Emergency Management/Public Health budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Local School Districts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts City Admin Scott County Public Works; City Public Works, Scott County Soil & Water Conservation District; Local Watershed Districts Scott County Soil & Water Conservation District; Scott County Watershed Districts, City Public Works; Scott County Planning & Resource Management Division; City Planning Divisions Scott Watershed Mgmt. Organization Scott County Emergency Management, Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County Emergency Management; Scott County Public Health Scott County EM; City EM; Shakopee Public Utility Commission; New Prague Public Utilities; Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Health (n O t N • L R SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d d .' CO E ,. O N M o N N O NI M o N N NI © N M o o N NI N O NI M o NI NI NI O NI M o NI N N © N M o NI NI C NI N M o NI NI N O NI M o NI NI d b a, a' a. W W O., L O 0. .a 7 -E - x 7 'O 7 -O _O x -O 'x 7 'O Mitigation Action Distribute flood preparedness and response information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Obtain funding to retrofit, elevate or relocate repetitive flooding structures in flood plains Obtain equipment to mitigate flooding on bridges, culverts, and roads. Perform a study of the feasibility of community waterways flood control Work with local units of government to insure completion of local flooding risk projects. Identify citizens subject to suffering from extreme temperatures. Create a Power Outage Policy for critical facilities. Educate the public on the dangers of extreme temperatures, particularly outdoor workers and kids playing sports. Hazard CO C .� o O CL Flooding Flooding CO C 1:5— O O Law Flooding Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold #k d' d' ,O d' N. d' co d' N in n ,O C 'C O, 'C 2026 Mitigation Action Status I I I I Extreme Create cooling/warming SC, SMSC, BP, 2026- CR, EMN, j, NP, Scott County Public Works, City Public 70 Heat, shelters for vulnerable Medium SI County/City Budget $200,000 Ongoing 2030 PL, S, Sh Works Departments Extreme Cold populations. In Progress Ongoing cn z 0 to O Ongoing In Progress Ongoing In Progress In Progress Deferred Est. Cost $25,000 0 0 �o fro 0 0 0 N ,--1 -64 0 0 d' 0 0 0 Ni 1--1 -VI- -VI- 0 0 0 N IS) -1,1-N 0 0 0 C O O 0 0 o d N fH 0 o N EFT Possible Funding County/State Budget, Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget Grants County/Dept Budget Grants Cnty/City/Dept Budget Grants County Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Fire Depts City Fire Departments City Fire Departments City Fire Departments; Scott County Planning & Resource Management Division City Fire Departments Scott County EM; City Fire Depts Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Scott County EM; City Fire Depts Scott County Zoning; Scott County Planning & Resource Management; City Planning Departments CO, O t 70 N L R SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh c4.1 E CO E ,. � o N CO o o N N CN O N CO o o N N o N CO 00 NI N NI O NI CO o o N N N o NI CO o o N N IN O IN CO o o N N N o NI CO o o N NI o NI N CO o o N N NI O NI CO o o NI N N b a w o. C4 R, o. o. z o. w w v w o. - y .. 0. a a x E 7 E 7 a x E a Mitigation Action Distribute wildfire awareness and preparedness information to schools and the public. Provide rural vegetation management educational information. Complete proactive life safety inspections of high density housing. Adopt Appendix H of the MN Fire Code to eliminate BBQ grills on balconies and patios of structures with 3 or more units. Complete Fire Prevention Programs in schools and adult assisted living facilities. Assist in obtaining a fire education -training trailer for the jurisdiction. Acquire and install six- inch water mains and hydrants communitywide. Obtain hazmat containment equipment for water, roads, and railroads. Adopt & enforce hazardous materials site building setback legislation. Hazard ti N C, w Wildfires Wildfires, Structure Fires Wildfires, Structure Fires Wildfires, Structure Fires Structure Fires Structure Fires Hazardous Materials Hazardous Materials #k m n d' n Lo n t, n co n rn n .--I co CO rn a, o, 2026 Mitigation Action L Status I I I I I I I I Distribute terrorism SC, SMSC, BP, preparedness and 2026- CR, EMN, J, NP, Cnty/Dept/BOE 100 Terrorism awareness information to Medium PE 2030 PL, S, Sh Scott County EM; City Police Depts Budget $2,000 Ongoing schools and the public. d.0 0 C 0 Deferred In Progress In Progress Deferred be 0 O 0 dB 0 O 0 Ongoing te 0 O 0 Est. Cost 0 0 O Ni- EA 0 0 O N b4 0 0 O N EA 0 0 o nj O rl En - 0 O O N b4 0 00 O -E,1- 0 00 O ER 0 0 O N -EA- H-? $75,000 Possible Funding County/Dept Budget County/Dept Budget County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget City/Dept Budget, Grants City/Dept Budget, Grants County/City Department Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts; Scott County GIS Scott County Sheriffs Office; City Police Departments Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County EM; City Police Depts. Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts OD O •t 1O N •L R SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh dC d E E C0NI E ,. s.L © N M O o NI N l0 O NiM 00 Ni Ni l0 O NI M 00 NI NI sID M O NI 00 NI NI l0 O NI M 00 Ni Ni l0 O NI M 00 NI NI O M 00 NI NI l0 O NI M 00 NI NI l0 O NI M 00 NI Ni N C. 0, 0, 0, 0"' CO W W 0, 0, L ° i. 0.• 0 a° ,- Utz x 0 Medium WO x Medium .awn x tO x Mitigation Action Educate government officials, the special needs population, and schools on procedures for handling suspicious mail. Post terrorism and bomb identification information in buildings and schools. Identify & distribute to appropriate officials potential terrorism targets information. Fund/maintain a trained bomb dog and handler to serve the entire county. Develop evacuation plans for identified terrorism targets. Replace malfunctioning or old warning sirens Provide back-up power sources to all sirens and warning systems Ensure an adequate number of sand bags and sand are on hand for flood prone areas of the county Purchase needed flood equipment including pumps and generators Hazard Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Summer Storms Summer Storms Flooding ov 0 0 0 F.-2, .-I 0 N 0 M 0 d' 0 11] 0 L� 0 00 0 O ti , -i 1 2026 Mitigation Action Status / \ f 00 blD / \ / OO f OO o O 0 Ongoing Est. Cost o bn- \ \ / / $5,000,000 co- Possible Funding County & City Budgets, Grants County, Tribal, & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants Private partner budgets, Grants City, County, & Tribal Budgets, Grants Private Partners, Grants Responsible Agencies County & City Public Works Departments County and City IT Depts County and City Public Works Sheriff's Office, City Police Departments Scott County GIS; Shakopee Public Utilities; New Prague Utility Commission; Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts Scott County Public Works, City Public Works, Shakopee Public Utility Commission, New Prague Utility Commission, Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative \ SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh 00 OO\ SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh // &\ SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Belle Plaine, Jordan, New Prague, Shakopee, MI \\\ ��/�� V) ©4/ cn ��220 2\=tea §§ Redesign bridges that contribute to flooding by Flooding improving the flow of High SI 2026- water and ice 2030 under/through the bridges �d \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ / _ % 6 E _ _ 6 0 0 0 ..-I § \ e g } f e g / \ 5 ) } Mitigation Action Detect and contain 100% of any malicious activity, including virus and malware on all infrastructure. Maintain contracts with private sources for temporary internet access Purchase signage that can be used to direct the public during times of emergency Create emergency Trauma Kits for responders in order to be prepared to quickly deploy & respond to various emergencies Assist Shakopee Public Utilities, New Prague Utility Commission, & Minnesota Valley Electric with the creation of power outage maps Raise roadways that are historically prone to flooding Identify electric lines which have a history of repetitive failures in Hazard e All Hazards ) » Flooding All Hazards N \ \ 0 0 &a ) \ g 3 3 Q g / / it - - - - - - - Possible Funding Responsible Agencies Jurisdictions U V Mitigation Action Mitigation Actions for Prior Lake r L 2026 Mitigation Action Status 0 0 O Ongoing Ongoing be 0 be 0 o Est. Cost O O N O O CD d Lr] EA O O 0 d Ln {64 $2,000 Possible Funding Cnty/City/Twp Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Public Health Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts y J 0 O t 'C H L R SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Time - frame O NI M O O NI NI O NI M O O NI NI O NI M O O NI NI O NI M O O NI NI d a, F W a. M Lc] CA Lc] cn Lc] Priority s az x Medium Medium Medium Mitigation Action Assist citizens to develop emergency preparedness, response and recovery plans. Train and equip 1st responders for search and rescue missions. Train and equip 1st responders to respond to mass -casualty events. Train 15t responders and community officials on the National Incident Mgmt. System. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards c -I N M d' 2026 � Mitigation Action Status In Progress o st a, Deferred Deferred Est. Cost o O 0 0 co Lf1 -64 O O o 0 co Ln iA O O o 0 co d iA o o co N 'A- Possible Funding Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/Education Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Red Cross; Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Local School Districts Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, 1, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, 1, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, 1, NP, PL, S, Sh Time - frame NI O N M O O NI NI ND O N M 0 0 NI NI O NI N M O O NI N O NI M O O NI N d F Priority Medium C 0 a Medium 3 0 a Mitigation Action Obtain & install emergency generators or "pigtails" for critical government facilities and fuel depots. Assist non -governmental critical facilities to obtain emergency generators and/or pigtails. Obtain funding to add disaster shelters as necessary. Assist schools to implement a disaster phone line. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards L!!J iO 1, CO tap 2026 Mitigation Action Status Deferred Deferred Deferred Deferred Deferred an 0 to 0 O Deferred an 0 an c O In Progress Est. Cost $2,000 $2,000 0 0 0 N LI) b9 0 0 N Vi 0 0 0 N .--1 {-R $2,000 0 0 0 N .--I fA $75,000 0 0 N {-R Possible Funding Scott County EM; Shakopee Public Utility Commission; New Prague Utilities County Utility Commission; Minnesota Valley Electric Budget, Grants CO-OP County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County/Business Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget County/City Budget, Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Scott County EM, Scott County Admin; City Police Depts; City Administration Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM, Scott County Admin; City Admin Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts; Scott County Public Works City Public Works Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts CO) O t N L SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d N .' CO E—. ,. i Assist utilities in 2026 developing restoration Low ES 2030 and mitigation plans. 0 N M 00 N N 0 N CO 00 N N 0 N on 00 N N 0 N M 00 N N 0 N CO 00 N N 0 N M 00 N N iD © N M 00 N N © N CO 00 N N N O, >, F• Lx] o, V] w V) W V) W V) w V) W V) W Lx] a, L O a. 3 Medium 3 J -0 J a 7 O Medium Mitigation Action Assist businesses, schools, the special needs population and public facilities to post evacuation routes. Obtain funds for critical government departments to develop Continuity of Operations Plans. Assist businesses to develop Business Continuity Plans. Assist communities in developing strategies to prevent loss of public records. Ensure mutual aid, shelter, response, mass casualty & recovery agreements are current. Assist critical sites to develop and provide an emergency plan to the EMA. Install new warning sirens in new developments rural townships and replace older sirens. Educate public on how to sign up for CodeRED. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards it O .--I M .-I d' .-I N .--I s.o -. N. .-I CO .-I 0, .-I 2026 Mitigation Action Status .6 G 0 .o 0 0 Deferred In Progress Deferred In Progress In Progress In Progress Est. Cost 0 0 0 d" b4 0 0 0 N b4 00 0 .N-1 b4 0 0 0 b4 0 0 0 0 o to 63 0 0 0 N b9 0 0 0 N b4 $4,000 Possible Funding County/City Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget Cnty/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Grants County Budget County/Dept Budget Cnty/City/Emergency Management/Public Health budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Works, City Public Works; Scott County EM; City Police Depts; City Administrations Scott County EM; City Police Depts City Administrations Scott County Public Health; Scott County Health & Human Services Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts (n O t N L SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d N El0 CO E ,. co N on 00 N N O N on 00 N N O N Cr] 00 N N O N CO 00 N N O N CO 00 N N O N CO 00 N N ,JS co N CO 00 N N co N CO 00 N N d b F• n' a, L*.7 0.. A" a, 4" L 'OT^ ac 7 N 7 N ac 7 a) X. --' 7 V Mitigation Action Proactively determine policies/process for postdisaster FEMA response and mitigation applications. Distribute safe room/shelter in place information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Train & equip 1st responders to respond to high wind events. Develop a debris clearance program that can be utilized countywide. Obtain funding to build mobile home community storm shelters. Adopt & enforce mobile home tie down and skirting legislation. Identify special needs populations that rely on electricity for medical equipment. Educate public on how to stay safe during storms and promote the use of emergency kits and 72 - hour shelter-inplace kits Hazard All Hazards C. V CC vs., ti C J.`1'.,'CC E, . L+ " O O V) cn CZ] Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms k M N d" N O CO . CO N CO CO Cr) l� CO 0, CO 2026 Mitigation Action Status N N tz a a In Progress In Progress A °....) to a ❑ In Progress In Progress In Progress bA O c o Est. Cost rr oo NI o N V to49- $25,000 d _ Possible Funding County/Dept Budget County & City Budgets, Grants County/City Budget Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County Budget, Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts, Local School Districts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts, City Admin Scott County Public Works; City Public Works, Scott County Soil & Water Conservation District; Local Watershed Districts Scott County Soil & Water Conservation District; Scott County Watershed Districts, City Public Works; Scott County Planning & Resource Management Division; City Planning Divisions Jordan City Administration; Jordan Public Works Scott County Public Works Scott Watershed Mgmt. Organization Scott County Emergency Management, Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County Emergency Management; Scott County Public Health Scott County Emergency Management; City Emergency Managers; Shakopee Public Utility Commission; New Prague Public Utilities; Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative In O t N L SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Jordan SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d F'. E.' N CO E g. N O N co 0 0 N N O N M 0 0 N N O N M 0 0 N NI O NI CO 0 O NI NI O N CO O 0 N NI O NI CO O 0 NI N IN O N M 0 0 NI NI �O O N M 0 0 NI NI N O, >, Ls.] a a �? a a a a N v] w v] w Priority ° C x C x C C X x Mitigation Action Distribute flood preparedness and response information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Obtain funding to retrofit, elevate or relocate repetitive flooding structures in flood plains Obtain equipment to mitigate flooding on bridges, culverts, and roads. Perform a study of the feasibility of community waterways flood control Work with the City of Jordan on flood damage reduction efforts Work with local units of government to ensure completion of local flooding risk projects. Identify citizens subject to suffering from extreme temperatures. Create a Power Outage Policy for critical facilities. Hazard CO -0 0 0 Flooding Flooding CZ -0 0 0 Flooding Flooding Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold #k d d' s.0 d' N. d' CO d' c -I t1] NI tr1 N. �O CO 'O 2026 Mitigation Action Status 0D 0 CUD O Ongoing In Progress Ongoing 0 b.0 O 0 WO O In Progress 0 CLO O In Progress Est. Cost 0 O O O O O U9 O O Lf N {a4 O O O O N c-1 Vi O O O O N .--1 U4 $52,000 O O d O O C j "A - Possible Funding County/City/ Emergency Management/Public Health budget County/City Budget County/State Budget, Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget Grants County/Dept Budget Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Health Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Departments Scott County EM; City Fire Depts City Fire Departments City Fire Departments City Fire Departments; Scott County Planning & Resource Management Division City Fire Departments Scott County EM; City Fire Depts Scott County Public Works; City Public Works CO) O t N L SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d § E.' N CO E ,. O N CO 00 N N © N co 00 N N O © N M 00 N N O N CO 00 N N O N M 00 N N O N M 00 N N ,C, O N M 00 N N O N on 00 N N O N on 00 N N N Ow w - a 0. z n a w w cn `o a acu cL., two cu a cu 3 - two Mitigation Action Educate the public on the dangers of extreme temperatures, particularly outdoor workers and kids playing sports. Create cooling/warming shelters for vulnerable populations. Distribute wildfire awareness and preparedness information to schools and the public. Provide rural vegetation management educational information. Complete proactive life safety inspections of high density housing. Adopt Appendix H of the MN Fire Code to eliminate BBQ grills on balconies and patios of structures with 3 or more units. Complete Fire Prevention Programs in schools and adult assisted living facilities. Assist in obtaining a fire education -training trailer for the jurisdiction. Acquire and install six- inch water mains and hydrants communitywide. Hazard w x w u Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold C) C) Wildfires, Structure Fires C N �� w Wildfires, Structure Fires Structure Fires Structure Fires k 0, c, n M n d' I, ,c I, n n CO N O, I, , CO 2026 Mitigation Action Status I I I I I f I I Obtain hazmat SC, SMSC, BP, Hazardous containment equipment 2026- CR, EMN, J, NP, Cnty/City/Dept 98 Materials for water, roads, and Medium ES 2030 Pb, S, Sh Scott County EM; City Fire Depts Budget Grants $20,000 In Progress railroads. Deferred Ongoing blD p C'DCID 0 Deferred In Progress In Progress Deferred I10 o 0 WO D 0 0 Est. Cost O 0 O N -64_ o 0 O N O 0 O N _ O 0 O N 4R-64 o 0 O N O 0 0 N O 1--1 -rag 0 0 O Ni y} o 0 0 O Lf) R 0 0 0 O Lf) A Possible Funding Scott County Zoning; Scott County Planning & Resource Management; City Planning County Budget Departments Cnty/Dept/BOE Budget County/Dept Budget County/Dept Budget County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget City/Dept Budget, Grants City/Dept Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County GIS Scott County Sheriff's Office; City Police Departments Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County EM; City Police Depts (n O t 70 N L i SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh BP, CR, ENM, J, NP, PL, S, Sh BP, CR, ENM, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d N E § CO E., ��.,, Adopt & enforce hazardous materials site 2026- building setback Low P 2030 legislation. © N M o0 N N iD O N CO 00 N N O N co 00 N N © N on 00 N N © N co 00 N N © N on 0o N N ,C,O N co o N N © N M 00 N N N b F• a, a. 0, a, a. W W W Priority E 7 a° a° x Medium Medium x Medium Mitigation Action Distribute terrorism preparedness and awareness information to schools and the public. Educate government officials, the special needs population, and schools on procedures for handling suspicious mail. Post terrorism and bomb identification information in buildings and schools. Identify & distribute to appropriate officials potential terrorism targets information. Fund/maintain a trained bomb dog and handler to serve the entire county. Develop evacuation plans for identified terrorism targets. Replace malfunctioning or old warning sirens Provide back-up power sources to all sirens and warning systems Hazard Hazardous Materials Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Summer Storms Summer Storms it J O Cn O O ti c -I O ti N O ti M O ti d' O ti 1 -.0r• O ti -•CO O ti O ti 2O26 Mitigation Action Status 0.0 0 0 bA o 0 bA a 0 o 0 Ongoing 0 0 0 0 bA 0 0 Est. Cost $5,000 $75,000 0 0 0 0 o 0 ll7 ER 0 0 0 o 0 En 0 0 0 o IM EELA $25,000 0 0 0 O d, ER 0 0 0 O . A E Possible Funding County/City Department Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County, Tribal, & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budget, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants Private partner budgets, Grants Responsible Agencies Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts County & City Public Works Departments County and City IT Depts County and City Public Works County & City GIS, Scott County Emergency Management; Sheriff's Office, City Police Departments Scott County GIS; Shakopee Public Utilities; New Prague Utility Commission; (n O R SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh a: z m_ z 0 c3cC a v, v a. SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Belle Plaine, Jordan, Scott County SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Belle Plaine, Jordan, New d d CO E., �;.,, N CO 00 N N s411 0 N CO 00 N N N M 00 N N N co 00 N N N CO 00 N N N M 00 N N N M 00 N N ‘411 0 N CO 00 N N N CI. a. a, v7 O. W R, aa v7 Priority =b�A =b�A =b�A C E 7 vtwo Medium Mitigation Action Ensure an adequate number of sand bags and Flooding sand are on hand for flood prone areas of the county Purchase needed flood equipment including pumps and generators Redesign bridges that contribute to flooding by improving the flow of water and ice under/through the bridges Detect and contain 100% of any malicious activity, including virus and malware on all infrastructure. Maintain contracts with private sources for temporary internet access Purchase signage that can be used to direct the public during times of emergency Identify homes, facilities, and/or businesses subject to potential landslides. Create emergency Trauma Kits for responders in order to be prepared to quickly deploy & respond to various emergencies Assist Shakopee Public Hazard Flooding an O O La .., 6, u CJ cn All Hazards Landslide v, 'O C. N N (6 O d All Hazards it O .-I .-I , -I , -I N .--I .-y M c-1 c -I so , -I .-y O N .--I .-I N - N N - 2026 Mitigation Action Status Ongoing Ongoing ao .o 0.0 0 Est. Cost $750,000 O CO O CO - 0 o 121- O OO O In -Err Possible Funding Jordan City Budget, Grants; Valley Green Mobile Home Park City, County, & Tribal Budgets, Grants Private Partners, Grants Responsible Agencies Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative Jordan Public Works, Jordan City Admin Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts Scott County Public Works, City Public Works, Shakopee Public Utility Commission, New Prague Utility Commission, Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative CO, O t 'C • N L Prague, Shakopee, Scott County O C3 L O SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Belle Plaine, Jordan, New Prague, Shakopee, Scott County d N E. ,§;, 00 N N 00 N N 00 N N N Priority bA x bD x G d Mitigation Action Utilities, New Prague Utility Comm, & Minnesota Valley Electric with the creation of power outage maps Install larger culvert(s) within Valley Green Mobile Home Park to increase drainage during flooding Raise roadways that are historically prone to flooding Identify electric lines which have a history of repetitive failures in severe weather and bury those lines Hazard Flooding Flooding All Hazards #k O M .-I N Cr) r1 d M I -I Mitigation Actions for Savage L 2026 Mitigation Action Status Ongoing b o an 0 bA a at 0 Ongoing Est. Cost o o - 0 O v EH 0 O n iA o o � Possible Funding Cnty/City/Twp Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Public Health Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh I I Time - frame %.O O N M O O N N %.0 o N M O O N N \O O N M O O N N .b O N M O O N N d w a. cn W n W Le) W Priority an x Medium Medium Medium Mitigation Action Assist citizens to develop emergency preparedness, response and recovery plans. Train and equip 1st responders for search and rescue missions. Train and equip 1st responders to respond to mass -casualty events. Train 1st responders and community officials on the National Incident Mgmt. System. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards #k .4 N cn 2026 Mitigation Action Status In Progress Deferred Deferred Deferred Est. Cost 0 0 0 o O ,..r, e» 0 0 0 d O lf) e» 0 0 O o O 7]-.64 vi 0 O 0 N Possible Funding Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/Education Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Red Cross; Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County y Ste.. O t Fo . L SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Time - frame s.O o N(Y) O O N N ,.O O N M O O N N %.'0 O N M O O N N ‘..b o N M O O N N CU n. H 0.. R. G L_7_, cri w0 Priority Medium 3 Medium 3 Mitigation Action Obtain & install emergency generators or "pigtails" for critical government facilities and fuel depots. Assist non -governmental critical facilities to obtain emergency generators and/or pigtails. Obtain funding to add disaster shelters as necessary. Assist schools to implement a disaster phone line. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards 1,4 U] ,CD C--- CO 2026 Mitigation Action Status Est. Cost Possible Funding Responsible Agencies EM; City Police Depts Local School Districts H O t 10 y L R Time - frame d 6. Priority Mitigation Action Hazard 2026 Mitigation Action Status Deferred a) 0 I I Deferred Deferred Deferred 0 o Deferred Est. Cost co 0 0 0 N de 0 0 0 N be $52,000 0o 0 0 Ni -Ive 0 csi 1-1 -Ele 0 0 N be o 0 cN-1 be Possible Funding County Utility Budget, Grants I � County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County/Business Budget, Grants I � Cnty/City/Twp Budget I � Cnty/City/Twp Budget County/City Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County Emergency Management; Shakopee Public Utility Commission; New Prague Utilities Commission; Minnesota Valley Electric CO-OP Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Scott County EM; ,Scott County Admin; City Police Depts; City Admin Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM, Scott County Admin; City Admin Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Jurisdictions SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh ICU R [—, W O N M 0 0 N N ,D O N M O O NI NI \O O NI M O O NI NI s.7 © NI M O O NI NI ,D © NI M 0 0 N (-,1 iD © N M O O NI NI ,D O N M O O NI NI 0 a, F L p, v1 W W. a. V) W V") W V) W V) W V) W Lam' o 3 3 E 3 E I � Medium 0 ': Mitigation Action Assist utilities in developing restoration and mitigation plans. Assist businesses, schools, the special needs population and public facilities to post evacuation routes. Obtain funds for critical government departments to develop Continuity of Operations Plans. Assist businesses to develop Business Continuity Plans. Assist communities in developing strategies to prevent loss of public records. Ensure mutual aid, shelter, response, mass casualty & recovery agreements are current. Assist critical sites to develop and provide an emergency plan to the EMA. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards a L o M Ln ' S. Possible Funding O O Lf) Responsible Agencies Jurisdictions Mitigation Action County/City Budget D O N M O O N N W .0 cc CO VI) O N M 0 0 N N W a 7 All Hazards Ongoing 0 bA 0 o Deferred N bA 0 0 a Deferred In Progress O O O ,1-7 EA O O O N H3 O ti -69-b4 O O O W O O O d co Ln A O O O N 4R County/City Budget 0. U \ bn T O 0 V 0 Cnty/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Grants County Budget Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts City Public Works Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County EM, City Police Depts; City Admin SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh a: a z w v U C V, V 0. SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh VI) O N CO 0 0 N N iD © N M O O N N uD O N M 0 0 N N \O O N M 0 0 N N iD O N M O O N N ,O O N on O 0 N N a' 0. W 0. v] v) 3 - x 0 O 'O 0 7 'O -CUD x 0 O 'O Proactively determine policies/process for postdisaster FEMA response and mitigation applications. Distribute safe room/shelter in place information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Train & equip 1st responders to respond to high wind events. Develop a debris clearance program that can be utilized countywide. Obtain funding to build mobile home community storm shelters. Adopt & enforce mobile home tie down and skirting legislation. All Hazards Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms C. O O C n § O U cn Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms M N d' N o CO r1 M N CO CO CC) 2026 Mitigation Action Status In Progress N O ° a O O a In Progress v3 Q O c a cn O C 0 ° a In Progress Est. Cost 0 0 0 N EH 0 0 0 d' EA 0 0 0 N EA $2,000,000 0 0 0 0 co N A 0 0 I. Ili ER 0 0 0 O `� R Possible Funding County/Dept Budget Cnty/City/Emergency Management/Public Health budget County/Dept Budget County & City Budgets, Grants 017 -0 0 r:0aa Imo' U y C G ca 0 O S. V C7 County & City Budgets, Grants County Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County Public Health; Scott County Health & Human Services Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Local School Districts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts City Admin Scott County Public Works; City Public Works, Scott County Soil & Water Conservation District; Local Watershed Districts Scott County Soil & Water Conservation District; Scott County Watershed Districts, City Public Works; Scott County Planning & Resource Management Division; City Planning Divisions Scott Watershed Mgmt. Organization Scott County EM, Scott County Public Works, City Public Works H ..4 rn ^a SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh CC vi 0.. = L z �z W ry, FCI z �wv N V R. SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d d E E CO F•w iD O NI M o0 NI NI NI O NI M 00 NI NI Ur O N co 00 NI NI iD O N CO 00 NI NI (N O N M 00 NI NI iD O NI M 00 NI NI NI O NI M 00 NI N N p"' a, a, A" cn a cn Priority Identify special needs populations that rely on High electricity for medical equipment. E a 3 E E Medium Mitigation Action Educate public on how to stay safe during storms and promote the use of emergency kits and 72 - hour shelter-inplace kits Distribute flood preparedness and response information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Obtain funding to retrofit, elevate or relocate repetitive flooding structures in flood plains O 0 0 N i A. O o" -O u O O vi O N N bO 'D 'd O E , ° Perform a study of the feasibility of community waterways flood control Work with local units of government to insure completion of Hazard Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms on O 0 Flooding C O 0 C 0 0 Flooding *k 1, m cs co d' d. ,o d. n d. CO d. N in 2026 Mitigation Action Status II local flooding risk projects. In Progress In Progress 0 03 o 0 o Ongoing In Progress 0 0 0 0 0 0 Est. Cost 00 0 L.r E 0 0 0 N 44 00 0 o EA- 0 0 0 d' Ea 0 0 0 0 o N EA 00 0 t+] " 0 0 0 EA- 00 0 c•4 0 0 0 d' EA- Possible Funding County & City Budget, Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Budget County/City/ Emergency Management/Public Health budget County/City Budget County/State Budget, Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants Responsible Agencies City of Savage, DNR, Sheriffs Office Scott County Emergency Management; Scott County Public Health Scott County Emergency Management; City Emergency Managers; Shakopee Public Utility Commission; New Prague Public Utilities; Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Health Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Depts Scott County EM; City Fire Depts City Fire Departments City Fire Departments City Fire Departments; Scott County Planning & Resource Management Division H O C., O 7 Cirn O C6 SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, I, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, I, NP, PL, S, Sh d d E E CO E. �o N M 00 NI N Nno N M 00 NI NI NIo N M 00 NI NI NIo N M 00 NI NI No N M 00 NI NI Nno NI CO 00 NI NI No NI M 00 NI NI Nno N M 00 NI NI ,,l, c:, NI M 00 NI NI CI) >, w w w � L4 c. a CG Z c w o •� D. 0 �n x In x C Medium o a i o to 0 Mitigation Action Develop a plan to provide for the safe coexistence of commercial and recreational navigation Identify citizens subject to suffering from extreme temperatures. Create a Power Outage Policy for critical facilities. Educate the public on the dangers of extreme temperatures, particularly outdoor workers and kids playing sports. Create cooling/warming shelters for vulnerable populations. Distribute wildfire awareness and preparedness information to schools and the public. Provide rural vegetation management educational information. Complete proactive life safety inspections of high density housing. Adopt Appendix H of the MN Fire Code to eliminate BBQ grills on balconies and patios of structures with 3 or more units. Hazard Flooding Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Wildfires Ci m s. w 70 =',.,. Wildfires, Structure Fires Wildfires, Structure Fires #k .-i 'C N. 'C 00 'C rn 'C o n m n d' n vO N. N. N. 2026 Mitigation Action Status i Complete Fire Prevention SC, SMSC, BP, Wildfires, Programs in schools and 2026- CR, EMN, J, NP, County/City Budget In 78 Structure adult assisted living Medium PE 2030 PL, S, Sh City Fire Departments Grants $12,000 Progress Fires facilities. Ongoing In Progress In Progress Deferred O tO o Z O o Deferred In Progress In Progress Est. Cost O O O N In E $2,000,000 O O O O Ni EA O O O N EFT O o O N ER O O O N _ O o O N iR O O O N EH O O O Ni O c -I Possible Funding County/Dept Budget Grants County/Dept Budget Grants Cnty/City/Dept Budget Grants County Budget Cnty/Dept/BOE Budget County/Dept Budget County/Dept Budget County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Fire Depts Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Scott County EM; City Fire Depts Scott County Zoning; Scott County Planning & Resource Management; City Planning Departments Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County GIS Scott County Sheriff's Office; City Police Departments In O u "O H 7 SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d d CO E. sLo N M OO N N ono N M OO N N © N M 0 O N N �o N M OO N N vl,o N CO OO N N ..6o N CO OO N N ,41,c N M OO N N b© N CO OO N N s.O© N CO OO N N N CI. ›% cn WW W cn V) W a. O. W a. W a. W O. 0., — Assist in obtaining a fire education -training trailer Low for the jurisdiction. on v 3 3 3 un Medium Mitigation Action Acquire and install six- inch water mains and hydrants communitywide. Obtain hazmat containment equipment for water, roads, and railroads. Adopt & enforce hazardous materials site building setback legislation. Distribute terrorism preparedness and awareness information to schools and the public. Educate government officials, the special needs population, and schools on procedures for handling suspicious mail. Post terrorism and bomb identification information in buildings and schools. Identify & distribute to appropriate officials potential terrorism targets information. Fund/maintain a trained bomb dog and handler to serve the entire county. Hazard Structure Fires Structure Fires Hazardous Materials Hazardous Materials Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism #k O, n c-1 O CO o O, o O c -I c -I O .-I N o .-I M o T --I d" O .-y 2026 Mitigation Action Status I Develop evacuation plans SC, SMSC, BP, Scott County EM; City Police Depts 2026 105 Terrorism for identified terrorism Medium ES CR, EMN, J, NP, Scott County Public Works, City Public County/Dept Budget $2,000 Deferred 2030 targets. PL, S, Sh Works 0 0 o .o 0 0 Ongoing 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Est. Cost O 0 0 v3 O 0 0 O 0 N ors $75,000 0 0 d 0 viEA- EA- O 0 o O 0 0 0 C O 0 Possible Funding City/Dept Budget, Grants City/Dept Budget, Grants County/City Department Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County, Tribal, & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County EM; City Police Depts Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts County & City Public Works Depts County and City IT Depts County and City Public Works Sheriff's Office, City Police Departments C o C., V BP, CR, ENM, J, NP, PL, S, Sh BP, CR, ENM, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh n z Z ce,, N v, U O. SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d d '. �'+ F.g. ,D O N M 00 N N 'D O N M 00 N N 'D O N CO 00 N N .D O N M 00 N N k.'0O N M 00 N N \i, © N M 00 N N .D © N M 00 N N s.6O N M 00 N N N Ow cn w cn w a, a a. a. w V)>, w f•, F0 C. 0 Medium .0 0 .0 0 . can 0 .0 0 0 0 .cn 0 Mitigation Action Replace malfunctioning or old warning sirens Provide back-up power sources to all sirens and warning systems Ensure an adequate number of sand bags and sand are on hand for flood prone areas of the county Purchase needed flood equipment including pumps and generators Redesign bridges that contribute to flooding by improving the flow of water and ice under/through the bridges Detect and contain 100% of any malicious activity, including virus and malware on all infrastructure. Maintain contracts with private sources for temporary internet access Purchase signage that can be used to direct the public during times of emergency Create emergency Trauma Kits for responders in order to be prepared to quickly deploy & respond to various emergencies Hazard Summer Storms Summer Storms Flooding Flooding Flooding s. .F -0 u CJ cn All Hazards cn ti N N N 0 d it l� 0 .-I O 0 .-y O .--I .-y . .- I - N .-I - M .--I , -i 'D .--1 .-y . N .-y 0 O bp LS n o '•W era boo N ^ et C O LT4 O Ln b9- Possible Funding Responsible Agencies Jurisdictions c-1 O N M CD. O NI N a. Mitigation Action 0 w M Mitigation Actions for Shakopee 2026 Mitigation Action Status Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing PC 0 6.0 0 Est. Cost 0 O 0 N Vi 0 O 0 O Lf] b4 0 O 0 O Lf] s4 $2,000 Possible Funding Cnty/City/Twp Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Public Health Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts En J 0 O t H L R SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Time - frame %IPNI O M O O N NI O NI M O O NI NI O NI M O O NI NI NI O N M O O NI NI d F U] P. CA W v] W CA W Priority ao Medium Medium Medium Mitigation Action Assist citizens to develop emergency preparedness, response and recovery plans. Train and equip 1" responders for search and rescue missions. Train and equip 1" responders to respond to mass -casualty events. Train 15t responders and community officials on the National Incident Mgmt. System. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards c -I N M d' 2026 Mitigation Action Status r � In Progress Deferred Deferred Deferred I� Est. Cost c) o 0 0 O in EA o O 0 0 O VI -En- 0 O 0 0 O d iA o 0 0 N 64 Possible Funding Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/Education Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Departments Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Red Cross; Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; Local School Districts, City Police Depts y O 0 t V1 L R SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Time - frame ,IDNI O N on O O N N kl)NI co N M 0 0 N N co NI N M O O N N `n O N M O O N N d F 0 0 W 4 i o a. 7 V a Medium 3 a Mitigation Action Obtain & install emergency generators or "pigtails" for critical government facilities and fuel depots. Assist non -governmental critical facilities to obtain emergency generators and/or pigtails. Obtain funding to add disaster shelters as necessary. Assist schools to implement a disaster phone line. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards in go N co 2026 Mitigation Action Status O 0 Q Deferred Deferred Deferred be 0 CC C Deferred Ongoing In Progress Est. Cost O 0 0 N -R O 0 0 N ER $52,000 O 0 0 N ER 00 0 TN -1 -I.,4{R I I $2,000 00 0 .N-1 $75,000 0 0 0 N -R Possible Funding I - t County Utility Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants I � County/Business Budget, Grants I � Cnty/City/Twp Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget I � County/City Budget, Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County Emergency Management; Shakopee Public Utility Commission; New Prague Utilities Commission; Minnesota Valley Electric CO-OP Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Scott County EM, Scott County Admin; City Police Depts; City Admin Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County Emergency Management, Scott County Admin; City Administrations Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County Emergency Management; Scott County Public Works; City Police Departments; City Public Works Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts H 0 O U II) 7 SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh cu. CU E CO F.w .46O N M o0 N NI © Ni M 00 N N Ur © N M 00 N N O N M 00 NI N O N M 00 N NI O N CO 00 N N C N M 00 N NI ..6 O N M 00 N N O N CO 00 N N d rL F 47 w w a, V) w V7 w v) w cn w N w 47 w w a ts o s C. o a o a 0 a o a 0 °) 0 a 0 v °n C Medium Mitigation Action T Assist utilities in developing restoration and mitigation plans. Assist businesses, schools, the special needs population and public facilities to post evacuation routes. Obtain funds for critical government departments to develop Continuity of Operations Plans. Assist businesses to develop Business Continuity Plans. Assist communities in developing strategies to prevent loss of public records. Ensure mutual aid, shelter, response, mass casualty & recovery agreements are current. Assist critical sites to develop and provide an emergency plan to the EMA. Install new warning sirens in new developments rural townships and replace older sirens. Educate public on how to sign up for CodeRED. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards it O .--I co c -I d` .--I Lf) ---I VD c -I L, r1 O .--I 0, ---I 2026 Mitigation Action Status O b.0 0 O CLOv 0 v t. CI In Progress Deferred In Progress In Progress Cfl 0 5. 0 O R. In Progress Est. Cost 0 0 0 d' fR 0 0 0 N ER 0o 0 ,N -I {R c 0 0 OJ Vi 0 o 0 0 O LC) -be. o 0 0 N ER c 0 0 N ER c 0 0 d" -R o 0 0 N ER Possible Funding County/City Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget Cnty/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Grants County Budget County/Dept Budget Cnty/City/Emergency Management/Public Health budget County/Dept Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts City Public Works Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Works Scott County Emergency Management, City Police Depts; City Administrations Scott County Public Health; Scott County Health & Human Services Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Local School Districts H O 4.4 C., H F. 7 SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d d CO F.,. NI o NI M 00 NI NI NI o NI M 00 N NI NI © NI M 00 N NI NI o NI M 00 NI NI N o NI M 00 NI NI NI o NI M 00 N N NI © NI Cr) 00 NI NI NI o NI M 00 NI NI NI o NI M 00 NI N d O. F 0" 0. W 0, v) v1 4. 0. 0,. C. a x X X x X x X a Mitigation Action Proactively determine policies/process for postdisaster FEMA response and mitigation applications. Distribute safe room/shelter in place information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Train & equip 1st responders to respond to high wind events. Develop a debris clearance program that can be utilized countywide. Obtain funding to build mobile home community storm shelters. Adopt & enforce mobile home tie down and skirting legislation. Identify special needs populations that rely on electricity for medical equipment. Educate public on how to stay safe during storms and promote the use of emergency kits and 72 - hour shelter-inplace kits Distribute flood preparedness and Hazard All Hazards Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Flooding k M NI d' NI o M 7 -i M NI M Cr M h CO Cr. M 7' d' 2026 Mitigation Action Status response information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. In Progress In Progress En b. 0 cf, 0 c a In Progress In Progress OA C 0 te bA C 0 Est. Cost $2,000,000 O 0 O NEA 0 0 Ln Eh 0 0 0 o ,. En- 0 0 0 vi N b4 0 0 N 64 O 0 0 o �i {A $4,000 Possible Funding County & City Budgets, Grants County/City Budget Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County Budget, Grants County & City Budget, Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Budget County/City/ Emergency Management/Public Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts City Admin Scott County Public Works; City Public Works, Scott County Soil & Water Conservation District; Local Watershed Districts Scott County Soil & Water Conservation District; Scott County Watershed Districts, City Public Works; Scott County Planning & Resource Management Division; City Planning Divisions Scott Watershed Mgmt. Organization Scott County Emergency Management, Scott County Public Works, City Public Works City of Savage, DNR, Sheriff's Office Scott County Emergency Management; Scott County Public Health Scott County Emergency Management; City Emergency Managers; Shakopee Public Utility Commission; New Prague Public Utilities; Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Health H 0 O C., "O H Fs 7 SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Savage SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d d E E CO F.,. No NM 00 N NI NIo N M 00 N N No NI M 00 NI NI No NI M 00 NI NI NIM N 00 NI NI `no NI M 00 NI NI �o N M 00 NI NI NIo NI M 00 NI NI Cl) ¢ F Medium P a. w w w a l.�' 0 0. obi) 0 E m E 0 E a �c�n 0 SDA 0 Medium Mitigation Action Obtain funding to retrofit, elevate or relocate repetitive flooding structures in flood plains Obtain equipment to mitigate flooding on bridges, culverts, and roads. Perform a study of the feasibility of community waterways flood control Work with local units of government to insure completion of local flooding risk projects. Develop a plan to provide for the safe coexistence of commercial and recreational navigation Identify citizens subject to suffering from extreme temperatures. Create a Power Outage Policy for critical facilities. Educate the public on the dangers of extreme temperatures, particularly Hazard Flooding Flooding Flooding Flooding Flooding Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold # 'O 7`' N. d' N d' NI 11] c -I 'O N. 'O CO 'O 0, 'O 2026 Mitigation Action Status I I I outdoor workers and kids Health budget playing sports. be 0 o be 0 0 In Progress b G a be O 0 Ongoing te 0 o be 0 0 In Progress Ongoing In Progress In Progress Deferred Est. Cost 00 0 0 O N u3 O 0 0 Ln N {A O O 0 69-.-I{-R O O 0 N 4A O O 0 ,1-7.N O O 0 _ E O O 0 N Lf]A b9 $2,000,000 O O 0 O N -R O o 0 N {-R Possible Funding County/City Budget County/State Budget, Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget Grants County/Dept Budget Grants Cnty/City/Dept Budget Grants County Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Departments Scott County EM; City Fire Depts City Fire Departments City Fire Departments City Fire Departments; Scott County Planning & Resource Management Division City Fire Departments Scott County EM; City Fire Depts Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Scott County EM; City Fire Depts Scott County Zoning; Scott County Planning & Resource Management; City Planning Departments H O C., 'O H 7 SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh 6> d CE CO F.,. No N M 00 NI NI ono NI CO 00 NI NI �o N M 00 N N ono N M 00 N NI �o N M 00 NI NI �o N M 00 N NI ono N M 00 NI N �o NI M 00 NI NI ,1) c, NI M 00 NI NI �o NI M 00 N NI d F, aa. a. x z c w a, w w a ° a`. Medium 3 a° 3 a° 0 3cl. a° 0 a 3 a° Mitigation Action Create cooling/warming shelters for vulnerable populations. Distribute wildfire awareness and preparedness information to schools and the public. Provide rural vegetation management educational information. Complete proactive life safety inspections of high density housing. Adopt Appendix H of the MN Fire Code to eliminate BBQ grills on balconies and patios of structures with 3 or more units. Complete Fire Prevention Programs in schools and adult assisted living facilities. Assist in obtaining a fire education -training trailer for the jurisdiction. Acquire and install six- inch water mains and hydrants communitywide. Obtain hazmat containment equipment for water, roads, and railroads. Adopt & enforce hazardous materials site Hazard Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Wildfires N v w 5 Wildfires, Structure Fires Wildfires, Structure Fires Wildfires, Structure Fires Structure Fires Structure Fires Hazardous Materials Hazardous Materials lk o n co n d" n ,.o N n N co N rn N ti co co 01 cs 0, 2026 Mitigation Action Status II building setback legislation. Ongoing te O 0 ac O 0 Deferred In Progress In Progress Deferred Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Est. Cost O O O N _ O O O N _ o O O N +4,_ O O O Ni O O O Ni O c-1 ER O O OCT, N _ OO O Lfl OO O Lr)I.f) Vi O O O Vi OO O vi L Possible Funding Cnty/Dept/BOE Budget County/Dept Budget County/Dept Budget County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget City/Dept Budget, Grants City/Dept Budget, Grants County/City Department Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County GIS Scott County Sheriff's Office; City Police Departments Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County EM; City Police Depts. Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts H ° u 'O H 7 SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, I, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, I, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, I, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, I, NP, PL, S, Sh d d CE E CO F.,. NO N M OO NI NI NIC N M OO NI NI NO N M OO NI NI NO NI M OO NI NI NI0 NI M OO NI NI N0 NI M OO N N NIC N M OO NI NI N0 NI M OO NI NI NIO N M OO NI NI NO NI M OO NI NI CL) 0.›, F a. aa. aa.. a. a w w w a. o. a w` ° a -I x Medium Medium x Medium x x Mitigation Action Distribute terrorism preparedness and awareness information to schools and the public. Educate government officials, the special needs population, and schools on procedures for handling suspicious mail. Post terrorism and bomb identification information in buildings and schools. Identify & distribute to appropriate officials potential terrorism targets information. Fund/maintain a trained bomb dog and handler to serve the entire county. Develop evacuation plans for identified terrorism targets. Replace malfunctioning or old warning sirens Provide back-up power sources to all sirens and warning systems Ensure an adequate number of sand bags and sand are on hand for flood prone areas of the county Purchase needed flood equipment including pumps and generators Hazard Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Summer Storms Summer Storms Flooding CT "Cl O O w it O o .-y , -I O .-y NI O . M O N. d' O ti L1] O ti L� O ti O O ti O .--- ti c -I .--, . 2026 Mitigation Action Status o 0 0 b.9 0 00 O dB o O PA o 0 be o 0 0 Est. Cost 0 O 0 O o 0 O O 0 0 o O O 0 0 N O O 0 c 69 $5,000,000 Possible Funding County & City Budgets, Grants County, Tribal, & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants City, County, & Tribal Budgets, Grants Responsible Agencies County & City Public Works Departments County and City IT Depts County and City Public Works Sheriff's Office, City Police Departments Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts H C o u o,r ', 7 SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh P. a z m c.,W vi U C a v, V 0. SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Q. d E.' E CO F.g. c © N M 0 0 N N © N M 0 0 N N NI O N M 0 0 N N N O N M 0 0 N N I © IN M 0 0 N N CL) Q F 7, P. f/] U1 P. l.�' FR stn 0 . tin 0 E 0 .C4 �ttA 0 Mitigation Action Redesign bridges that contribute to flooding by improving the flow of water and ice under/through the bridges Detect and contain 100% of any malicious activity, including virus and malware on all infrastructure. Maintain contracts with private sources for temporary internet access Purchase signage that can be used to direct the public during times of emergency Create emergency Trauma Kits for responders in order to be prepared to quickly deploy & respond to various emergencies Raise roadways that are historically prone to flooding Hazard "Cl o 0 w L .L 0 u cn All Hazards L,, ct N C6 0 d Flooding it N r-1 c -I M c -I .-y 'O r-1 c -I c -I N c -I N M c -I Scott County Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2026 Mitigation Actions for the SMSC 2026 Mitigation Action Status iI Assist citizens to develop SC, SMSC, BP, CR, Scott County 2026- EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Cnty/City/Twp 1 All Hazards emergency preparedness, High PE 2030 EM; City Police & $2,000 Ongoing response and recovery plans. Sh Fire Depts Budget Ongoing Ongoing O 0 60 0 O Est. Cost O O O O in O O O O in O O O Ni UH Possible Funding Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Public Health Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts tn O t .O C R SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Time - frame ,ID O N M O O N N ,L O N M O O NI NI ,.o O N M 0 0 NI NI d VI W CA W VI W L O a Medium Medium Medium Mitigation Action Train and equip 15t responders for search and rescue missions. Train and equip 15t responders to respond to mass -casualty events. Train 1st responders and community officials on the National Incident Mgmt. System. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards NI CO 2026 Mitigation Action Status c v -Si E 0 U Deferred Deferred Deferred Est. Cost O O O O O LC) H O O O O O V] {A O O O O O ''' iA O O O N EFT Possible Funding Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants Cnty/Education Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Departments Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Red Cross; Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Local School Districts y 0 O t .O SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh Time - frame NI O N on O O N N )1, c). N M 0 0 N N ,O O N on O O N N ,.O O N on O O N N F. a a w t i 0 o.. " E 0 '6 0 a0 Medium a0 Mitigation Action Obtain & install emergency generators or "pigtails" for critical government facilities and fuel depots. Assist non -governmental critical facilities to obtain emergency generators and/or pigtails. Obtain funding to add disaster shelters as necessary. Assist schools to implement a disaster phone line. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards in 'C h co 2026 Mitigation Action Status w o Q IC w o Q -C w 0 Q Deferred Deferred on or) y 0 Deferred to O bq 0 In Progress to o O oc 0 Est. Cost O co O N 64 O O O N 64 O LO -64 O co O N 64 O 'N-1 V3 O O O N 64 00 O 1N-1 LET $75,000 co O O N 4A O O O d' 44 Possible Funding County Utility Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County Budget, Grants County/Business Budget, Grants Cnty/City/Twp Budget Cnty/City/Twp Budget County/City Budget, Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget County/City Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County Emergency Management; Shakopee Public Utility Commission; New Prague Utilities Commission; Minnesota Valley Electric CO-OP Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Scott County Emergency Management. Scott County Admin; City Police Depts, City Admin Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County Emergency Management, Scott County Admin; City Admin Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts; Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts II) O t 10 L R SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, I, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, I, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, I, NP, PL, S, Sh ,D.' d E -.w ND O N M O O N N k.b O NI M O O N N NI O N on O O N N ND O NI M O O N N ND O N M O O N N sl)NI O N CO O O N N ND O N M O O N N NI O N M O O N N sl)NI O N M O O N N ND O NI M O O N N d Q. 0-, F VI w 0.) a V] w V) w V) w V) w V) w VI w 0.) a a im F. a. 0 a 0 a Medium 0 a 0 -a a' 7 0 N 7 N - eA x Medium 0 .- Mitigation Action Assist utilities in developing restoration and mitigation plans. Assist businesses, schools, the special needs population and public facilities to post evacuation routes. Obtain funds for critical government departments to develop Continuity of Operations Plans. Assist businesses to develop Business Continuity Plans. Assist communities in developing strategies to prevent loss of public records. I Ensure mutual aid, shelter, response, mass casualty & recovery agreements are current. Assist critical sites to develop and provide an emergency plan to the EMA. Install new warning sirens in new developments rural townships and replace older sirens. Educate public on how to sign up for CodeRED. Proactively determine policies/process for postdisaster FEMA response and mitigation applications. Hazard All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards All Hazards 0 . -I M . -I d" ,-I L! a -I ,.0 . -I L. . -I CO a -I 0, a -I co NI 2026 Mitigation Action Status o ta. O o Deferred In Progress Deferred In Progress In Progress cn o ❑ a s. taC O O ❑ a Est. Cost co O o0 0o N Y3 OO O c•s 'EIS O O e b4 O O O 0 ©. u-, O O O N iA O O O N 64 O O O •�' b., O O O N 4R Possible Funding Cnty/City/Twp Budget Cnty/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Grants County Budget County/Dept Budget Cnty/City/Emergency Management/Public Health budget County/Dept Budget Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts City Public Works Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Works, City Public Works; Scott County EM; City Police Depts City Administrations Scott County Public Health; Scott County Health & Human Services Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Local School Districts y O fj H L SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, 5, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh CC Vi o.. C. m a. v, Z V L SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d d .' czE E -.w sO O N M O O N N ,O O N M O O N N ,D O N M O O N N 'D O N M O O N N sO o N M O O N N sO O N M O O N N ,D C NI M O O N N 'D O N M O O N N d a, F CL C 0.. �% �" 0.. 0. L '�^ a. tip x 7 O 7 N bA x O N b-0 x 0 c, oo Mitigation Action Distribute safe room/shelter in place information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Train & equip 1st responders to respond to high wind events. Develop a debris clearance program that can be utilized countywide. Obtain funding to build mobile home community storm shelters. Adopt & enforce mobile home tie down and skirting legislation. Identify special needs populations that rely on electricity for medical equipment. Educate public on how to stay safe during storms and promote the use of emergency kits and 72 - hour shelter -in place kits Distribute flood preparedness and response information to schools, the special needs population, and the community. Hazard Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms Summer Storms, Winter Storms L. E E E E" F O O O c.,, v,, c' -n c0 -O O O w # d' N o M c-1 M N M M M L� M O, M d' d' 2026 Mitigation Action Status r � In Progress In Progress 0 as tOD 0 ❑a In Progress Of) a 0 OD a 0 OID a 0 In Progress Est. Cost $2,000,000 o 0 0 0• o 0 0 v 0 00 0 0 0 0 N 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 6 O $25,000 Possible Funding County & City Budgets, Grants County/City Budget Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County Budget, Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Budget County/City/ Emergency Management/Public Health budget County/City Budget County/State Budget, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts, City Admin Scott County Public Works; City Public Works, Scott County Soil & Water Conservation District; Local Watershed Districts Scott County Soil & Water Conservation District; Scott County Watershed Districts, City Public Works; Scott County Planning & Resource Management Division; City Planning Divisions Scott Watershed Mgmt. Organization Scott County Emergency Management, Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Scott County Emergency Management; Scott County Public Health Scott County Emergency Management; City Emergency Managers; Shakopee Public Utility Commission; New Prague Public Utilities; Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Scott County Public Health Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Departments Scott County EM; City Fire Depts V) O : 'L =. SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh n: z m _ In ... V] CJ CC co U O. SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh n: z CO _ V] 'i1 V] V a .a to CJ O. SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d d E.' ctEN E -.w o CO O O NI N o N M O O N N O N M 0 0 N N o N M O O NI N s.sSO N CO O O NI N Vr O N M O O NI N iD O N M O O N N ,L o N CO O O N N ,S o NI M O O N N d ,9a, F 4" a. N W W a. N a, t' '- 6. Obtain funding to retrofit, elevate or relocate Medium repetitive flooding structures in flood plains -a x a -av a a) tx x en x a Medium o a Mitigation Action Obtain equipment to mitigate flooding on bridges, culverts, and roads. Perform a study of the feasibility of community waterways flood control Work with local units of government to insure completion of local flooding risk projects. Identify citizens subject to suffering from extreme temperatures. Create a Power Outage Policy for critical facilities. Educate the public on the dangers of extreme temperatures, particularly outdoor workers and kids playing sports. Create cooling/warming shelters for vulnerable populations. Distribute wildfire awareness and preparedness information to schools and the public. Hazard Flooding Flooding aS.. 00 0 T.-',. Flooding Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold 0 CJ a 4 N w x w Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold w '"O # l0 ' ' N. d' W d' N 11] N. l0 CO s.O O l0 O h M h N O y Possible Funding Responsible Agencies Jurisdictions .D O NI CO O O NI NI Cd y F w C) F O a. Mitigation Action z O tC o Y IC O V C) O • C) CCCC E O G O N C C E C O � a E I s. D O O CA C O In Progress Ongoing In Progress In Progress Deferred O0 O C O Deferred O .N-1 -en-64 O O O d' C O .N-1 V} $52,000 O O O C O O N fn -be C O ON be- O O O Ni 44 O O O NI iA O O O N' 4H O O O N ee County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget Grants County/Dept Budget Grants Cnty/City/Dept Budget Grants County Budget V O 0O J\+ O. O Q \ bI O 5 V CO County/Dept Budget County/Dept Budget City Fire Departments City Fire Departments; Scott County Planning & Resource Management Division City Fire Departments Scott County EM; City Fire Depts Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Scott County EM; City Fire Depts Scott County Zoning; Scott County Planning & Resource Management; City Planning Departments Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts Scott County EM; City Police Depts SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh sD O NI CO O O N N Vr o N CO O O NI NI .D o N CO O O N NI .D o NI CO O O NI N ,D O NI CO O O N N ,O o NI M O O N N 'D O NI CO O O N N iD o N CO O O NI NI ,D O N CO O O N N ,O O N CO O O N NI O a w a `) w cn w a w a W a W a to x E O v E O a) o a x Medium 3 a° E o 3 a° 3 a° Complete proactive life safety inspections of high density housing. Adopt Appendix H of the MN Fire Code to eliminate BBQ grills on balconies and patios of structures with 3 or more units. Complete Fire Prevention Programs in schools and adult assisted living facilities. Assist in obtaining a fire education -training trailer for the jurisdiction. Acquire and install six-inch water mains and hydrants communitywide. Obtain hazmat containment equipment for water, roads, and railroads. Adopt & enforce hazardous materials site building setback legislation. Distribute terrorism preparedness and awareness information to schools and the public. Educate government officials, the special needs population, and schools on procedures for handling suspicious mail. Post terrorism and bomb identification information in buildings and schools. Wildfires, Structure Fires Wildfires, Structure Fires Wildfires, Structure Fires Structure Fires Structure Fires Hazardous Materials Hazardous Materials Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism l0 N l� N W N O N .--1 CO CO O O O O O .--1 .--1 O .-1 NI O .--1 2026 Mitigation Action Status r � In Progress In Progress Deferred 0 tag O 0 0 0 0 o 0 a WC a Ongoing o Ca) a 0 CIA a Est. Cost O O O N ER CD O O N O O O O N H4 O O O tri {A $75,000 O O O CI- O O L.f) A O O O O O b•"1 O O O O N -En-V3 o O 71. O O O O O O Lf] b4 Possible Funding County/Dept Budget County/City Budget Grants County/Dept Budget County/City Department Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County, Tribal, & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants County & City Budgets, Grants City, County, & Tribal Budgets, Grants Responsible Agencies Scott County EM; City Police Depts; Scott County GIS Scott County Sheriff's Office; City Police Departments Scott County EM; City Police Depts., Scott County Public Works, City Public Works Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts Sheriff/Police Departments, Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts County & City Public Works Departments County and City IT Depts County and City Public Works Sheriff's Office, City Police Departments Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts IA O : 'y R SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh n: z m _ Cr, U-' vi (. aC a U O. SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh SC, SMSC, BP, CR, EMN, J, NP, PL, S, Sh d d E'. i f'5 E -.w NI co NI M O O NI N N co, NI M O O N N ND co N M O O NI NI ,1:, co N M O O NI N co NI N M O O N N ND co, N M O O N NI ND co N M O O N NI ,D O NI M O O NI NI ND O N M O O N NI O NI N CO O O N NI d a. ›, F m a, a. v) w a. a. a. a, a. w w a. Lam' i C a. Identify & distribute to appropriate officials High potential terrorism targets information. Fund/maintain a trained bomb dog and handler to Medium serve the entire county. Medium Otr, x Purchase needed flood equipment including High pumps and generators .O x .b0 x Medium .O x .b0 x Mitigation Action Develop evacuation plans for identified terrorism targets. Ensure an adequate number of sand bags and sand are on hand for flood prone areas of the county Redesign bridges that contribute to flooding by improving the flow of water and ice under/through the bridges Detect and contain 100% of any malicious activity, i.e. virus and malware on all infrastructure. Maintain contracts with private sources for temporary internet access Purchase signage that can be used to direct the public during times of emergency Create emergency Trauma Kits for responders in order to be prepared to quickly deploy & respond to various emergencies Raise roadways that are historically prone to flooding Hazard Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Flooding Flooding Flooding D F. 'C a te � , a. U All Hazards All Hazards Flooding M O N --I d" O r1 Lf1 O ,--I O .-1 e- 1 .--1 .--1 r1 N .-1 N--1 M .-1 r1 lD c-1 ,--1 .--1 NI ." 1 NI M 1--1 Section 6 - Plan Maintenance 6.1 Monitoring, Evaluation, and Updating the Plan The Scott County Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan (MHMP) should be considered a living document. The plan should be updated and approved by FEMA at a minimum of every 5 years. The guidance in this section will function as the primary tool when reviewing progress on the implementation of the Scott County MHMP. Throughout the 5 -year planning cycle, the Emergency Management Director from the Scott County Sheriff's Office and first responders will reconvene annually to monitor, review, evaluate, and update the Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan. Additional stakeholders will be added based on need. If needed, the Scott County Emergency Management Director will convene the group to meet on a more regular basis to monitor plan implementation progress and reassess needs and opportunities. This could be done annually, or in response to funding cycles of programs that provide resources for hazard mitigation activities. If there is a need for a special meeting due to new developments or a declared disaster occurring in the county, the team will meet to update pertinent mitigation strategies. Depending on grant opportunities and fiscal resources, mitigation projects may be implemented independently by individual communities or through local partnerships. The committee will review the MHMP goals and objectives to determine their relevance to changing situations in Scott County. In addition, state and federal policies will be reviewed to ensure they are addressing current and expected conditions. The committee will also review the risk assessment portion of the plan to determine if this information should be updated or modified. The parties responsible for the various implementation actions will report on the status of their projects, and will include which implementation processes worked well, any difficulties encountered, how coordination efforts are proceeding, and which strategies should be revised. Historically and continuing on, the MHMP has been used by each city to write and update EOPs, given guidance in risky flooding areas when considering building ordinances in cities and county, and is used by the County when updating the THIRA every three years. Additionally, the County's Public Health Jurisdictional Risk Assessment (JRA), which is comparable to a THIRA, used information from the MHMP to complete; the newest update of the JRA is valid through December 2029. Updates or modifications to the MHMP during the 5 -year planning process will require a public notice and a meeting prior to submitting revisions to the individual jurisdictions for approval. The plan will be updated via written changes, submissions as the committee deems appropriate and necessary, and as approved by county commissioners. 1761 Page 359 6.2 Implementation Scott County and its included municipalities share a common Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan and work together closely to develop, revise, and implement it. This MHMP provides a comprehensive chart of mitigation actions for Scott County and its jurisdictions (see Section 5.3.1, Hazard Mitigation Actions). Jurisdictions participated in the MHMP planning process and identified the specific mitigation strategies that they would seek to implement in their communities during the 5 -year planning cycle. These mitigation actions are provided in Appendix G: Mitigation Actions by Jurisdiction. A number of implementation tools are available to address hazards. Many of these tools are below, however, in some cases additional discussion is needed in order to identify what strategies are most appropriate to use. This will be part of an ongoing discussion as Scott County looks for opportunities for plan implementation. The following tools will be considered: Education: In many cases education of residents has been identified as one of the most effective mitigation strategies. Capital Investments: Capital investments such as fire and ambulance equipment, sprinkler systems and dry hydrants are tools that can limit risks and impacts of natural and man-made hazards. Data Collection and Needs Assessments: Data collection and needs assessments can aid in gaining a better understanding of threats and allow planning for mitigation strategies accordingly. As resources are limited for this part of the planning process, additional data collection is likely to be an ongoing activity as resources become available. Coordination: Responsibilities for mitigation strategies run across various county departments, local fire and ambulance departments, city and township governments, and a host of state and federal agencies. Ongoing coordination is an important tool to ensure resources are used efficiently. Coordination can also avoid duplication of efforts or prevent gaps that are created because of unclear roles and responsibilities. The mitigation plan review process can function as a tool to have an ongoing discussion of roles, responsibilities, and opportunities for coordination. Regional Cooperation: Counties and public safety services providers throughout the Northeastern Region of Minnesota often share similar challenges and concerns. In some cases a regional approach may be warranted as a mitigation strategy in order to save resources. Mutual aid agreements are a tool already in use for a number of services. Needs assessments for fire and ambulance services and development of assistance for volunteer recruiting, training, and retention could benefit from a regional approach. Cooperation among counties could also help in lobbying for certain funding priorities that address concerns relating to challenges in service delivery in rural areas. Organizations such as FEMA Region V and the MN Department of HSEM through the Regional Program Coordinator can offer tools and resources to assist in these cooperative efforts. Regulation: Regulation is an important mitigation tool for Scott County. Regulation plays a particularly important role for land use, access to structures and the protection of water resources and public health. 177IPage 360 6.3 Continued Public Involvement Continued public involvement is critical to the successful implementation of the Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan (MHMP). The Scott County Emergency Management Director and the steering committee members from the participating jurisdictions of the cities of Belle Plaine, Elko New Market, Jordan, Prior Lake, Savage, and Shakopee will continue to engage new public stakeholders in planning discussions and project implementation during the 5 -year cycle of this plan. The plan will be posted on the Scott County website for the public to read and provide feedback. Collected feedback will be reviewed and the plan will be amended as necessary. During the 5 -year period before the plan is updated, steering committee members will be responsible to keep their city councils, city departments, schools, and community members updated and engaged in the implementation of their respective mitigation action charts (see Appendix G: Mitigation Actions by Jurisdiction). Each respective jurisdiction will report their progress in this area to the Scott County Emergency Management Director. Jurisdictions will use numerous means of public outreach to engage new public stakeholders in providing input on mitigation efforts or concerns on hazards by sharing information at city council meetings, sharing information at special events, working with local schools and partner organizations, and posting information on relevant local or social media that their communities use to inform and engage the public. As mitigation projects are implemented, jurisdictions will work to keep the public updated and engaged in those local efforts. 178IPage 361 APPENDICES Appendix A - Appendix B - Appendix C - Appendix D Appendix E - Appendix F - Appendix G - Appendix H Scott County Maps Scott County Critical Facilities Scott County Hazard Events - Steering Committee Meetings Public Meeting Notices & Meeting Notes Completed Mitigation Actions from 2021 Plan Works Cited - Scott County Plans & Programs In Place 179 362 Appendix B Scott County Critical Facilities Chemical and Hazardous Materials Complete list restricted Dams Ames Sand Creek MN Cedar Lake Diversion Sand Creek MN Cedar Lake Inlet Sand Creek MN Cedar Lake Outlet Sand Creek - Tributary MN Cynthia Lake Porter Creek MN Deboom Minnesota River - Tributary MN Dvorak F Pond Sand Creek - Offstream Tributary MN Henry Pond Vermillion River - Tributary MN Hilgenberg Pond Minnesota River - Tributary MN Jeffers Fish Pond Pikes Lake - Tributary MN Jeffers Upper Dam Pikes Lake - Tributary MN Jeffers Wildlife Pond Pikes Lake - Tributary MN Jordan Falls Sand Creek MN Jordan Mill Pond Sand Creek MN Maxa Pond Vermillion River - Tributary MN Pettit F Pond Vermillion River - Offstream Tributary MN Pleasant Lake Diversion Sand Creek MN Prior Lake NA MN Ruehlings Pond Minnesota River - Tributary MN Sunset Lake Minnesota River - Tributary MN Theis-Bendzick Pond Sand Creek - Tributary MN Vallez Fish Pond Sand Creek - Tributary MN 180IPage 363 Education Facilities Belle Plaine High School Chatfield Elementary Eagle Creek Elementary School Eagle Ridge Junior High Eagle View Elem. School Edgewood Elementary 220 S Market St. 330 S Market St 6855 Woodward Ave 13955 Glendale Rd 25600 Nevada Ave 5304 Westwood DR SE Belle Plaine Belle Plaine Shakopee Savage Elko New Market Prior Lake MN 56011 MN MN 56011 55379 MN 55378 MN 55054 MN 55372 Falcon Ridge Elementary School 1200 N Columbus Ave. New Prague MN 56071 Five Hawks Elementary. Grainwood Elementary 16620 Five Hawks Ave SE Prior Lake MN 55372 5061 Minnesota ST SE Prior Lake MN 55372 Harriet Bishop Elementary Hidden Oaks Middle School Hidden Valley Elementary Jeffers Pond Elementary Jordan ECFE Jordan Elementary Jordan High School Jordan Middle School Living Hope Lutheran School 14400 O'Connell Rd 15855 Fish Point RD SE 13875 Glendale Ave. 14800 Jeffers Pass 815 Sunset Drive 815 Sunset Drive 600 Sunset Drive 500 Sunset Drive 150W130thSt LNMV Area Catholic School 41 Church St Savage MN 55378 Prior Lake MN 55372 Savage Prior Lake Jordan Jordan Jordan Jordan MN 55378 MN 55372 MN 55352 MN 55352 MN 55352 MN 55352 M.W. Savage Elementary New Prague Middle School New Prague School District Office New Prague Sr. High School Oak Crest Elementary Education Facilities 4819 W 126th St 721 N Central Ave. 410 N Central Ave. 221 NE 12th St 1101 W Commerce Dr. Shakopee Elko New Market MN MN 55379 55054 Savage MN 55378 New Prague MN 56071 New Prague New Prague MN MN 56071 56071 Belle Plaine MN 56011 Our Lady of the Prairie School/Church 215 N Chestnut Belle Plaine MN 56011 Pearson Elementary Prior Lake Baptist School 917 Dakota St S 5690 Credit River Rd. Shakopee MN 55379 Prior Lake MN 55372 181IPag 364 Raven Stream Elementary 00 11th Ave NW New Prague MN 56071 Red Oak Elementary 7700 Old Carriage Ct Shakopee MN 55379 Shakopee Area Catholic School Shakopee High School Shakopee Jr. High School 305 S Scott St 100 17th Ave W 200 10th Ave E S Shakopee Middle School 1137 Marschall Rd Shakopee Shakopee Shakopee MN 55379 MN 55379 MN 55379 Shakopee MN 55379 Special Ed Extended School Year 4540 Tower St SE Prior Lake MN 55372 St Benedict School 24981 St Benedict Rd New Prague MN 56071 St. John the Baptist School 215 N. Broadway St. Jordan MN 55352 St John the Baptist School 12508 Lynn Ave S Savage MN 55378 St Michael Elementary School 16280 Duluth Ave SE Prior Lake MN 55372 St Paul's Lutheran School 5634 Luther Dr. SE Prior Lake MN 55372 Sun Path Elementary 2250 17th Ave E Shakopee MN 55379 Sweeney Elementary 1001 Adams St S Shakopee MN 55379 Trinity Lutheran School and Church 500 W Church St. Belle Plaine MN 56011 Twin Oaks Middle School Westwood Elementary 15860 Fish Point Rd SE Prior Lake 5970 Westwood DR SE Prior Lake MN Prior Lake MN 55372 55372 Emergency Services Belle Plaine Fire Department 700 East Main Street Belle Plaine MN 56011 Belle Plaine Police Department 420 East Main Street Belle Plaine MN 56011 Elko New Market Fire Elko New Department 601 Main Street Market MN 55054 Elko New Market Police Department 26518 France Avenue Elko New Market MN 55020 Jordan Fire Department 501 North Varner St Jordan MN 55352 Jordan Police Department Mdewakanton Public Safety 210 East 1st Street 2525 Flandreau Trail NW Emergency Services Jordan MN Prior Lake MN 55352 55372 New Prague Fire Department 505 5th Ave NW New Prague MN 56071 New Prague Police Department 118 Central Ave N #1 New Prague MN 56071 Prior Lake Fire Department 16776 Fish Point Road Prior Lake MN 55372 182IPag 365 Prior Lake Fire Department Station 2 3906 Station Place NW Prior Lake MN 55372 Prior Lake Police Department 4649 Dakota Street Prior Lake MN 55372 Savage Fire Department Station 1 12305 Quentin Ave Savage MN 55378 Savage Fire Department Station 2 14321 Oconnell Road Savage MN 55378 Savage Police Department 6000 Mccoll Drive Savage MN 55378 Scott County Sheriff's Office 301 Fuller Street South Shakopee MN 55379 Shakopee Fire Department 1 2700 Vierling Drive E Shakopee MN 55379 Shakopee Fire Department 2 1001 Vierling Drive W Shakopee MN 55379 Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community Fire Department and EMS 2525 Flandreau Trail NW Prior Lake MN 55372 Shakopee Police Department 475 Gorman Street Shakopee MN 55379 Energy Master Electric Co. Inc. 8555 123rd St Savage I MN 55378 Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative 125 Minnesota Valley Electric Dr. Jordan MN 55352 New Prague Electric Line Building 200 7th Street NW New Prague MN 56071 Government Facilities Administration Bldg St Patrick 24425 Old Hwy 13 Blvd Jordan Social Hall MN 55352 Belle Plaine District Offices 130 S Willow St. Belle Plaine MN 56011 Belle Plaine Public Works 420 E Main Belle Plaine MN 56011 Belle Plaine Library Belle Plaine MN 56011 Belle Plain Twp Admin Bldg 25130 Hickory Blvd. Belle Plaine MN 56011 Blakeley Twp Township Hall 15016 250 ST W Belle Plaine MN 56011 CAP Agency 712 S Canterbury Rd Shakopee MN 55379 Central Family Center (District Office) 505 S Holmes St Shakopee MN 55379 ] City Clerk Facility 18551 Redwing Tr Shakopee MN 55379 City of Belle Plaine 218 North Meridian St. Belle Plaine MN 56011 City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake MN 55372 183IPag 366 18985 Meadow View Credit River Twp Admin Bldg Blvd. Prior Lake MN 55372 Elko New Market City Hall 601 Main Street Elko New Market MN 55054 Elko New Market Public Works 100 Webster St Elko New Market MN 55054 Helena Township Administration 27466 Delmar Ave New Prague MN 56071 Highway Dept. Garage 22331 Union Trail Belle Plaine MN 56011 Jackson Twp Admin Bldg 1090 130th St. Shakopee MN 55379 Jordan City Hall 210 1St Street East #1 Jordan MN 55352 Jordan Public Works 903 Syndicate Street Jordan MN 55352 Juvenile Facility Law Enforcement 17681 Valley View Jordan MN 55352 Law Enforcement Center 301 South Fuller Street Shakopee MN 55379 Library Admin. Offices 13090 Alabama Ave South Savage MN 55378 Louisville Twp Admin Bldg 92 Mallard Dr. Louisville Township MN 55379 Mdewakanton Sioux Community 2330 Sioux Trail N.W. Prior Lake MN 55372 Administration Facility Mn Dept Of Natural Resources Jordan MN 55352 New Market Twp Admin Bldg 8950 230th St. Lakeville MN 55044 New Prague City Hall 118 Central Ave. N New Prague MN 56071 New Prague Generation Plant 300 E. Main St. New Prague MN 56071 New Prague Public Works 507 12th Street NE New Prague MN 56071 Prior Lake Library 16200 Erie Av Prior Lake MN 55372 Prior Lake Maintenance Center 17073 Adelmann St Prior Lake MN 55372 Public Safety Training Facility 17681 Valley View Jordan MN 55352 Public Works Central Shop 600 Country Trail East Jordan MN 55352 Savage City Hall 6000 McColl Drive Savage MN 55378 Savage Public Works 13800 Dakota Ave Savage MN 55378 Scott County Justice Center/Courthouse 200 4th Avenue West Shakopee MN 55379 Shakopee City Hall 129 Holmes Street S. Shakopee MN 55379 Shakopee Community Center 1255 S Fuller St Shakopee MN 55379 Shakopee Public Utilities Shakopee Public Works 255 S Sarazin St 500 S Gorman St Shakopee Shakopee MN 55379 MN 55379 1841 P 367 Spring Lake Township Town Hall 20381 Fairlawn Avenue Prior Lake MN 55372 St Lawrence Township Hall 7500 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Jordan MN 55352 SWCD & Extension Center - Agriculture 7151 190th St W. Jordan MN 55352 Warehouse & Transit 828 1st Ave East Shakopee MN 55379 Work Force Development Ctr 719 Canterbury Rd Shakopee MN 55379 Healthcare and Public Health Allina Health Dean Lakes Clinic 4201 Dean Lakes Blvd Shakopee MN 55379 Allina Health Savage Clinic 6350 143rd Street Savage MN 55378 Allina Health Shakopee Clinic 1601 St. Francis Ave Shakopee MN 55379 Allina SC Ambulance Service 8085 124th St. Savage 1 MN 55378 Crossroads Medical Ctr 1335 E 10th Ave Shakopee MN 55379 CVS Minute Clinic 4050 Deans Lakes Blvd Shakopee MN 55379 4151 Willowwood St. Fairview Clinic - Prior Lake NE Prior Lake MN 55372 Fairview Clinic - Savage 5725 Loftus Lane Savage MN 55378 Friendship Manor Nursing 1340 W 3rd Av Shakopee MN 55379 Home Lutheran Home 611 West Main St Belle Plaine MN 56011 Mala Strana Health Care Center 1001 Columbus Ave N New Prague MN 56071 Mayo Clinic Health System Clinic - Belle Plaine 700 W. Prairie Street Belle Plaine MN 56011 Belle Plaine Clinic 700 Prairie St W Belle Plaine MN 56011 Mayo Clinic Health System Clinic - New Prague 212 County Road 37 New Prague MN 56071 Mayo Clinic Health System Express Clinic - New Prague 200 Alton Ave SE New Prague MN 56071 Mayo Clinic Health System Hospital 301 2nd St NE New Prague MN 56071 New Prague Medical Clinic 301 E Main St New Prague MN 56071 4670 Park Nicollet Ave Park Nicollet Clinic - Prior Lake SE Prior Lake MN 55372 Park Nicollet Clinic - Shakopee 1415 St. Francis Ave Shakopee MN 55379 Parkview Medical Clinic 1400 NE 1St St New Prague MN 56071 Shakopee Dakota Mystic Clinic/Urgent Care 2400 Mystic Lake Drive Prior Lake MN 55372 Shakopee Friendship Manor 1340 Third Avenue W Shakopee MN 55379 185IPag 368 St Francis Regional Medical Center 1455 St Francis Avenue Shakopee MN 55379 St Francis Health Services Clinic 265 Creek Lane S. Jordan MN 55352 St Gertrude's Health Center 1850 Sarazin Street Shakopee MN 55379 St Mary's Clinic 505 Holmes Street Shakopee MN 55379 The Lutheran Home -Nursing 611 Main St W Belle Plaine MN 56011 Valley View Assisted Living 4061 W 173rd St Jordan MN 55352 Water Belle Plaine Wastewater Plant 22360 Union Trail Belle Plaine MN 56011 Belle Plaine Water Plant 801 Prairie St Belle Plaine MN 56011 Blue Lake Wastewater Treatment Facility 6957 Hwy 101 Shakopee MN 55379 Elko New Market Water Plant 25630 Co Rd 91 Elko New Market MN 55054 Jordan Wastewater Plant 903 Syndicate Street Jordan MN 55352 Jordan Water Plant 105 Yz 4th Street W Jordan MN 55352 New Prague Wastewater Plant 601 NE 12th St New Prague MN 56071 New Prague Water Booster Station 1001 10th Ave. SE New Prague MN 56071 New Prague Water Booster Station 210 10th Street SE New Prague MN 56071 New Prague Water Plant 305 Lexington Ave. S. New Prague MN 56071 New Prague Water Tower #1 1204 NE Highview New Prague MN 56071 New Prague Water Tower #2 1000 NW 4th St New Prague MN 56071 Prior Lake Water Plant 16335 Itasca Av SE Prior Lake MN 55372 Prior Lake Well Houses #3 16341 Itasca St SE Prior Lake MN 55372 Prior Lake Well Houses #4 16343 Itasca St SE Prior Lake MN 55372 Prior Lake Well Houses #5 5500 Bounty St SE Prior Lake MN 55372 Prior Lake Well Houses #6 15250 Wilds Parkway Prior Lake MN 55372 Prior Lake Well Houses #7 16343 Itasca AV Prior Lake MN 55372 Prior Lake Well Houses #8 & #9 17081 Adelmann St SE Prior Lake MN 55372 Savage Water Plant I 13800 Dakota Ave Savage Water Plant III 8100 Foxberry Bay Rd. Savage Savage MN 55378 MN 55378 Water outlet structure on Prior Lake 15287 Edinborough Ave Prior Lake MN 55372 186 I 1'ag 369 Appendix C Scott County Hazard Events The National Centers for Environmental Information Database was queried for all notable events since 1950. However, some categories of events do not have records prior to 1996. Data was available through May of 2019. Location or County Magnitude Deaths Injuries Property Dama e Damage + Prior Lake 09/17/2021 EF0 0 0 $250,000 Blakeley 6/10/2012 EF0 0 0 $250,000 New Market 6/11/2001 Fl 0 0 $50,000 Scott County 5/21/1977 F2 0 0 $250,000 Highest Value Property Damage: $250,000 Table C -1. All tornadoes recorded by NCEI, 1950 -November, 2025 Location Or County Date Size in Deaths Injuries Inches Property Damage Prior Lake 6/11/2001 1.75 0 0 $500,000 New Prague 18/24/2006 4.25 0 0 $10,000,000 Highest Value Property Damage: $10,500,000 Table C - 2. All severe hail storm events recorded by NCEI, 1950 -November, 2025 Location or County Shakopee Date 5/11/2022 Type Thunderstorm Wind Magnitude Deaths (knots) 50 0 Injuries Property Damage 0 10000 Shakopee Jordan 8/26/2021 Thunderstorm Wind 7/12 /2019 Thunderstorm ind 48 52 0 0 0 0 1000 5000 Belle Plaine 7/5/2016 Thunderstorm Wind 61 0 0 $25,000 Marystown 7/17/2015 Thunderstorm Wind 61 0 0 $100,000 Jordan 6/10/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 56 0 0 $5,000 Spring Lake 5/23/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 51 0 0 0 St Benedict 5/23/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 62 0 0 $2,000 Belle Plaine 7/10/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 63 0 0 0 Prior Lake 7/10/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 52 0 0 $5,000 1871 Page 370 Jordan 7/10/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 52 0 0 $35,000 Credit River 7/14/2010 Thunderstorm Wind 61 0 0 $25,000 New Prague 8/16/2002 Thunderstorm Wind 70 0 0 $50,000 New Prague 8/3/2002 Thunderstorm Wind 62 0 0 $40,000 New Prague 6/11/2001 Thunderstorm Wind 52 0 0 $5,000 Prior Lake 5/30/1998 Thunderstorm Wind 85 0 0 $17,600,000 Savage j 5/15/1998 Thunderstorm Wind 61 I 0 0 $170,000,000 Location or County Date Type Magnitude (knots) Deaths Injuries Property Damage Highest Value Property Damage: $170,000,000 Table C - 3. All severe thunderstorm wind events recorded by NCEI, 1950 -November, 2025 Table C - 4. All extreme flood events recorded by NCEI, 1997 -May, 2019 Location or County Date Type Deaths Injuries Property Damage Scott County 3/14/2019 Flood 0 0 $900,000 Blakeley 6/18/2014 Flood 0 0 $9,000,000 Shakopee 7/13/2013 Flash Flood 0 0 $500,000 Blakeley 6/26/2010 Flash Flood 0 0 $50,000 I Shakopee 3/20/2010 Flood 0 0 $400,000 Jordan 3/19/2007 Flood 0 0 $900,000 Scott County 8/3/2002 Flash Flood 0 0 $200,000 Highest Value Property Damage: $9,000,000 Table C - 8. All lightning events recorded by the NCEI, 1996 -November, 2025 Location or County Date Type Deaths Injuries Property Damage Savage 10/4/2005 Lightning 0 0 0 Prior Lake 9/4/2005 Lightning 0 0 $604,000 Shakopee 6/5/1999 Lightning 0 0 0 Prior Lake 3/24/1996 Lightning 0 1 0 Highest Value Property Damage: $604,000 188 371 Scott County Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2026 Appendix E Steering Committee Meetings 189 372 Slide 1 Slide 2 Slide 3 Scott County ••araro Mitigation Plan ca OH Meeting Pally 11.2024 Scott County Regional Training •aciIty Stin- t[ Introductions • �I EMe ♦ Sty- li Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting • Why are we here? • w,o.a•••••• plan............. s..•.. d e 4 de 5 de 6 Nmat .v I.a.•ard M.t,y.rt.on • Ary a•... are. t.o -. Ind Ana. ..A to N.#,%. Ar and o+c.M kr, n•N And r•...n .aa..e Koalas w- il %Mut is Lazard P.1t ,t.on • sw.w — .c.•ya a, r•.n..w. P0..<‘ • nolnIna.d oP •••.a 1ea4N. • A..e..•to. — wb.d.cn or sw.a .o • ••• ..an...rt of n.y.e....n d.,K .sown. Rd.., and o•wern • P.a.. w..rns and .d,<dhan oydna • tf.nlop.rre.r4 or •.roo..rr....t d non, +P. m. Hazard Mrtgat.on Plan Meeting • aware one Mtl(atics. Action • Mitigation Strateg.a. • wwge status at am aa.an • Sytgc•t ♦r.. Mit.gat.anActicm. • Opdate Cabnatod A•.orty R9. bide ♦IPfal 190 Page 373 Slide 7 Slide 8 Slide 9 Sava � LJi EMI a Itatard Mitigation Plan Meeting • Mtttgat.on Sara tapes • Prevmtaxs • Protection • Educancn • Emergency Servn:cs • improvements Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting • Provide status of all actions • a+....d no.tt..n.t.•nn • Ormone. •a•r.•.» cantos.. War, • In Itarro aun.nn. Wary fated 6Po, • Coma...../..P.s•lo'Y de 10 de 11 de 12 Itat and Mttgat.on Plan Meeting Orris Suggest new Mitigation Actions mar. r••.r�...� ...............�.� .Sea- n rya 6000 I Ia: and Mttgaton Plan Meeting OM, Suggest new Mitigation Actions -Example, • ••.•..•.•nr.a .ro•r •.�....s. •Sei' It ua:a•d 1.! tgaton Pbn Meeting tors Suggest new Mitigation Actions -Examples 191 Page 374 Slide 13 Slide 14 Slide 15 Scott ewe • de 16 Scott Cakulated Priority Risk Index Hazard Mitigation Plan Timeline Str�Ott Cakulated Priority Risk Index l'^ Scott Cakulated Priority Risk Index de 17 de 18 August 14,2024 lunsdx:txans identity exntmg mtgstion xtion status. Identity new Megaton Actions Scott Hazard Mitigation Plan Timeline rinurnesnrwys . aw ..i scrot t,sa Goss ocno,...y Darer aeas Dew el rt.s ceengiftsl Oncinoim 202.4 Pre.* enniii of TOO.6103b11,14.000•4 plot b al ap0 Mwnnt BII► Scott '6M1 S C R �� C=RFiR57=^e'- p •M•IM IMO 4=111 Ilarard Mitigation Plan Timeline ras ncirr a.axos QR. qw. hen l Oh Card... Thor.. dJ 1.W MI dr.• eP+H ban Cu., Or., Y. Ite.' Wp+. n..... 192 375 Slide 19 Y)11 Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Questions? 193 376 7/31/2024 Printed Name Agency Signature 1 �� ►tom s E SCCt\ CCL v '7� _ 2 mo o{ c..04t-r Cam- 3 Zp.a�,S DG., /115e)C 5641' C.,,,,ir it/4s.— i/�" 4 ^L✓1'1 /1/Y,'1h o Pa.�(Oc�a)L-P / 5 t:cfe cp:1(dlElc. _ro c! lG2/4:1---/ 6 I 7 8 9 10 11 8/14/2024 Printed Name Agency Signature 1 6, •,=)c Sc.,t* (--4,. 7 ;/ /r,4-i l- W 2 ,...‘ ��J` at •t. rc -�� 3 I -?\'-' VI 11 \ C Q> W '2.?'i� 5 R. - - L —._,..S c : �r (_a ✓ 6 Ale, r5...1 cl.o,.'s,_) S,Are U 7 Sys;,— Ham/ Jc,s&rC CI 9g--- ,k 8 9 10 11 12 194 377 Slide 1 Scntt de 4 Slide 2 Slide 3 Scot Carley Hand Mequon Flan August 14.2021 Scott County Lew Enlacement Center 4 0 ,S(Yltt lwoductant £44 4 c. w .. .taut • Identify a d Rra'Man • Rowe row ntw0an den prttpeM pwWry • Crate nes mMcetc den • Nett Stepp b.c M+Batron de 5 „Aide 6 4I► 4 Scott -C-------------- a�aw�aw _�_EMI= == WIZ MIMI= ==ate= ..... tee.. 195IPage 378 Slide 7 Slide 8 Slide 9 Se 1( .,Slide 10 P4 4 'I3 E44 4 • Rene nen ^1 tia ton "PeaD'NY..i. S tt • Create new mtpoon idae • ......._,_....... _....W........ W • • Ara a....,.._._...._...W....,_.,,..- • _..._..._.......,._..._•. _.._ .._. • „•...,,....• .,.�..e...,..,...,,..�.. r. dell .k)tt • riva , tic 'Marston • aww s$$.r •PPM Scza • Questoms' 196 379 (Slide 1 Slide 2 Slide 3 Scott Scott County Multi Hazard Mitigation Plan Final Planning Committee Meeting TUESDAY, APRIL 29, 2025 Scan • v.x • Rtwv I...a... Scott Welcome and Introductions Slide 4 Slide 5 Slide 6 Scott— • II41U W:M•NMNr M NV'S.. .w•.• M.0 fl. l M..r•.M P..% 44:.41..• N...Naar. 4141.,...... 4141..., 4141...., w.. I O.. ,... rx....w.... Ow K'... t..., Maldol ury...ti IwY.AYM 4.. Tw.�vw I••b. •y.ww WY. lbw.. G••I. 9.1 MY.. Maw.. MI.. C.• lbws* ;Scott • .•.4,I.uh..•..i..... • •ee.a w.eaw'M• MM Su4.u•N..vlr..1.•.a.slw. M.c... v W IT ..+.>•.... rfl S • W►«.V.wMW.+sup • I...ft 4t. 197IPage 380 Mitigation Category Mitigation Idea Prevention: Governmental, administratrve or regulatory actions and processes that influence the way land and buildings are developed and built. Also include public activities to reduce hazard losses. Examples includeplanning and zoc np building codes, capital improvements, open space preservation amd watermanagement regulations. tdA� dirty evi r��6 Aarws /a •!C Ce rlr.C1' 4. IL.. S -14k a' C' Property Protection: Actions to modify existing buildings or structures to protect them from a hazard or remove them from the hazard area. Examples include acquisition, elevation and retrofitting of structures. And the addition of storm shutters and shatter resistant glass. Education and Awareness: Actions to inform and educate community members. oft -c als, and property owners about hazards and potential mtigation actions. Examples include outreach protects, and school age and adult education programs. Natural Resource Protection: Actions that minimize hazard losses w• -de also preserve or restore the function functions of natural systems. Examples ncludesedlment/eros on control, stream restoration, watershed management, forest and vegitative management and wetland re storatiorr/protection. Emergency Services: Actions to protect people and property lrnnedatefyfollowing anevent Examples include warning systems, Emergency Services and Cntcal Infustructure protection. wv_ t re`�e Y u'..4s' 4.f1 4mw..4r Mr 4e. l �A,,,b,.Etr, w Alf. St r^ *La "1'4 .T (4.0.1.) C. ff«..( it%rON i)A.^"'1 te Structural Projects: Construction of structures to reduce the impacts of hazards. Examples include dams, levees, flood walls, and safe rooms. 1981 age 381 Mitigation Category Mitigation Idea Prevention: Governmental, administrative or regulatory actions and processes that influence the way Land and buildings are developed and built. Also Include public activities to reduce hazard losses. Examples Includeplanningand zoning, building codes, capital Improvements, open space preservation amd watermanagement regulations. p ?"14'67 C3a'�— e4 CR SI � f( r „ Property Protection: Actions to modify existing buildings or structures to protect them from a hazard or remove them from the hazard area. Examples include acquisition, elevation and retrofitting of structures. And the addition of storm shutters and shatter resistant glass. [^r +4y�� C 7►n'"' ( 11 ryQe + 61�w k Lte' 1 — )(0,11 4,i f Education and Awareness: Actions to inform and educate community members, officials, and property owners about hazards and potential mitigation actions. Examples include outreach projects, and school age and adult education programs. C U Neu. G„i.4ti t nw,00 r Q „,m -..t P(1261 SrgtK 44 CoM^v..-/wrk tnra Gt...e m fS P Natural Resource Protection: Actions that minimize hazard losses while also preserve or restore the function functions of natural systems. Examples Includesedlmentlerosion control, stream restoration, watershed management, forest and vegitative management and wetland restoration/protection. K a Emergency Services: Actions to protect people and property immediately following an event. Examples include warning systems, Emergency Services and Critical infustructure protection. Structural Projects: Construction of structures to reduce the impacts of hazards. Examples include dams, levees, flood walls, and sale rooms. ..mot ✓f-�,r _ c�,C (`_ _ S (1 �,Le �r� G {�`�� "dam Gr Cooi S t1 t*.. y 199 IWage 382 Mitigation Category Mitigation Idea Prevention: Governmental, administrative or regulatory actions and processes that Influence the way Land and buildings are developed and built. Also include public activities to reduce hazard losses. Examples includeplanning and zoning, building codes, capital improvements, open space preservation amd watermanagement regulations. Property Protection: Actions to modify existing buildings or structures to protect them from a hazard or remove them from the hazard area. Examples include acquisition, elevation and retrofitting of structures. And the addition of storm shutters and shatter resistant glass. Education and Awareness: Actions to inform and educate community members, officials, and property owners about hazards and potential mitigation actions. Examples include outreach projects, and school age and adult education programs. p, kiec kfi sAt(; Qi \' c., N tow) _.J f— dQ Ijl Uall'Z�' ''illti ( Z \� cti \d T " Sade$. i evfn!-S �'btli 1 ninK. 0t O\read ) gg�� 1-C thcff-" UV if SC ° c f `dbi it cr& Natural Resource Protection: Actions that minimize hazard losses while also preserve or restore the function functions of natural systems. Examples Includesediment/erosion control, stream restoration, watershed management, forest and vegitative management and wetland restoration/protection. Emergency Services: Actions to protect people and property immediately following an event. Examples include warning systems, Emergency Services and Critical Infustructure protection. Structural Projects: Construction of structures to reduce the impacts of hazards. Examples Include dams, levees, flood walls, and safe rooms. Mitigation Category Mitigation idea Preveation: Governmental, administrative or regulatory actions and processes that influence the way Land and bindings are developed and built. Also include public activities to reduce hazard losses. Fxamples niciudeplannine and zoning. budding codes, capital Improvements, open space preservation and watermanagement regulations. Property Protection: Actions to modify existing buildings or structures to protect them from a hazard or remove them from the hazard area. Examples include acquisition, elevation and retrofitting of structures. And the addition of storm shutters and shatter resistant glass. Education and Awareness: Actions to inform and educate community members. offIcials, and property owners about hazards and potential mitigation actions. Examples include outreach protects. and school age and adult education Programs. Natural Resource Protection: Actions that m nimize hazard losses Mule also preserve o' restore the function functions of natural systems Examples Inctudesednnent/erosion control, stream restoration, watershed management, forest and vegetative management and wetland restoiation/prceecf an. {y / �7 ' J %vit., t` f if " 1 `z,_L.4. i a� e��" a,e.•s _ i , (s!, J. \(yy,J,rJ , , Emergency Services: Actions to protect people and property imined:atety following an event. Examples include warning systems, Emergency Services and Critical Infuse ucture protection. RN-1, � 44 , a a 9 5-.+y.I Structural Projects: Construction of structures to reduce the impacts of hazards. Examples include dams, levees, flood walls, and safe rooms. -- _e /., !J a ,�,r_.,1 e k ( F. aa..~ C I r- I,- Q^'k 200 A'ag€ 383 Meeting Notes: During the first two planning committee meetings, staff noted that previous county mitigation efforts in the area of flood prone property buyouts have been a great success. The previous 5 repetitive loss structures still stand. 3 are Commercial structures, with one no longer using the area prone to flooding for business purposes. Since the publishing of the previous Multi Hazard Mitigation Plan, there have been no NFIP flood claims or payouts and only 3 claims for a total of $7409 since 2015. Additionally, staff noted that they are unable to enforce any measures that are stricter than current state building codes. Areas for future consideration include retrofitting current county owned properties to act as shelters during extreme heat/cold events, purchasing temporary dynamic signage for emergency messaging, and working with partners to install river gauges along the Minnesota river. It was noted repeatedly that most see mitigation as hindered by budgetary restraints at the local, state and federal levels. 201 t)age 384 Appendix F Public Meetings Scott County Emergency Management Scott County Seeks Input on Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan Update The Scott County Sheriff's Office is updating the County's Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan (MHMP) and is seeking input from residents and businesses to help shape the plan. Community members are invited to a public meeting: Date: Wednesday, March 12, 2025 Time: 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Location: Scott County Government Center. Room 166/167 "Understanding the hazards that Impact our community and taking proactive steps to mitigate them is key to building resilience." said Deputy Emergency Management Director Robert Lane. At the meeting, residents and businesses are encouraged to share: • Natural hazards they believe pose the greatest risks to their communities. • Personal experiences with past disasters. • Suggestions for actions to reduce the impacts of future disasters. The updated plan, developed with Input from County departments, municipalities, schools, and other key stakeholders, is essential to maintaining eligibility for federal disaster mitigation funding. Residents unable to attend the meeting can submit their feedback directly to Deputy Emergency Management Director Robert Lane at rlpne(dco.scott.mn.us . A draft of the updated plan will be posted on the County website for public review before it is submitted to the State of Minnesota. Public participation is critical to creating a plan that reflects the community's needs. For more information, visit https://www.scottcountymn.gov/2295/Multi-Hazard-Mitigation- Plan 2031 a g 386 Scott County Emergency Management is currently working to update the County's M ulti- Hazard Mitigation plan. As part of the planning process, Scott County is seeking feedback from residents and businesses from across the County to incorporate into the plan: ■ What are the natural hazards you feet pose the greatest risk to your community? • Have you experienced a previous disaster event? • What concerns do you have, and what sorts of mitigation actions or projects do you feel would help to reduce the damages of potential future events for your personal property, your community, or the County as a whole? The first of two public meetings for this process will take place Wednesday, March 12 from 5-7 PM. Comments, concerns, or questions regarding natural disasters and potential mitigation actions to be included into the plan update wilt be discussed and noted at this time. iscott County to host second Multi -Hazard Mitigation Planning Meeting The Scott County Sheriff's Office is updating the County's Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan (MHMP) and is seeking input from residents and businesses to help shape the plan. Community members are invited to a public meeting: Date: Tuesday, April 1 , 2025 Time: 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Location: Scott County Government Center, Room 166/167 At the meeting, residents and businesses are encouraged to share: • Hazards they believe pose the greatest risks to their communities. • Personal experiences with past disasters. • Suggestions for actions to reduce the impacts of future disasters. The updated plan, developed with input from County departments, municipalities, schools, and other key stakeholders, is essential to maintaining eligibility for federal disaster mitigation funding. For more information, visit https://www.scottcountymn.gov/2295/Multi-Hazard-Mitigation- Plan 2041 age 387 3/12/2025 I PRINTED NAME CITY/TOWNSHIP SIGNATURE 2 a Ii. "5 ET`k it 3 `r / I IE,fj�jizy- - 4 0 r5 0 . J bArAel 5 6 7 411/2025 PRINTED NAME! CITY/TOWNSHIP SIGNATURE 1 ) fP [fir./ // /7 /0 -i--- ,4v 2 t .t 3 )4-e}2nu 4 5 205 388 Table 70. Hazards identified in the 202I Scott County Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan Natural Hazards Drought Landslide/Mudslide Extreme Temperatures Flooding Hail High Winds Ice/Snow Storm Land Subsidence Hazardous Materials Lightning Wildfire Manmade Hazards Urban Structure Fire illegal Methamphetamine Labs Civil Unrest PandemidEpidemic Terrorism Doi ale' 72his e4 T1\ 3)FvtcC a"C bCrtG-- 206 389 Table 10. Hazards identified in the 2021 Scott County Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan Natural Hazards Drought Landslide/Mudslide Extreme Temperatures Flooding Hail High Winds Ice/Snow Storm Land Lightning Subsidence Wildfire Manmade Hazards Hazardous Illegal Materials Methamphetamine Labs Pandemic/Epidemic Terrorism Urban Civil Unrest Structure Fire ,/,'r/ d oo d 1,si PAP., _ A sooc, \ ear, /97/ ///: .2 /1 MAie71 v ctre ,LA C\c.-ss Iii/ln 17O/A1 Imo' i4c A i', e rvi's e A____ 1/40 14,1S I ,-5 Table 10. Hazards identified in the 2021 Scott County Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan Natural Hazards Drought Landslide/Mudslide Extreme Temperatures Hooding Hail High Winds Ice/Snow Storm Land Subsidence Lightning Wildfire Manmade Hazards Hazardous Materials Illegal Pandemic/Epidemic ' Methamphetamine Labs Terrorism Urban Structure Fire Civil Unrest (J�� Pt -CJ P�rll h'r 207IPage 390 208 391 Slide 1 Slide 2 Slide 3 Scott County Multi Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting #1 Wednesday, March 12, 2025 /Soot Welcome and Introductions de 4 de 5 �wSlide 6 BM► 4 w 3a.r.•..•.....wm.,.,,.. y.,..W....W,... not blow ens ....... 4—• «.... Ifolomb No* Sala • Minim •-n-....r,rrrr.•r.sw---.•..., ..... z lefr 209 392 Slide 7 Slide 8 Slide 9 Stoll • P.MIMIEP. • 14 Stoll • reW n..„ncati • • Stoll • P. INivera de 10 dell de 12 Scull Scull IN %Sa Akr 210IPage 393 Slice 13 Slid 14 211 394 Slide 1 Slide 2 Slide 3 Sirfill Scott County yM0 Multi Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting #2 TUESDAY, APRIL 1, 2025 Stott Acf .a. fMr &vtl Welcome and Introductions de 4 "de 5 .elide 6 yM� y .Si rNl lertinosamb wrw... I. ,..._._ w... row -r,. . fOrre . .,._...•r . -.... Si r,ll 7✓� £M £M 2121 Wage 395 Slide 7 Slide 8 Slide 9 Sant ,,,Slide 10 f4 Swum Stull P. hennView R..m+....cm, 1 EMS y de 11 de 12 A • 213 396 Slide 13 Slide 14 Meeting notes Scott • 1,10/4.1.01va, • Fblypeaw Mon Mole MSIOVIII. Citizens noted the work done by local and county officials to purchase and remove high risk, repetitive loss flood properties and transition them into either park lands or return them to natural green spaces. Discussion of Manmade Hazards showed that illicit drug labs are no longer a concern due to the efforts of local and federal law enforcement NEW concerns were voiced over the threat of Aviation incidents, and Pipeline safety. Aircraft incidents primarily were concerned with accidents involving small private aircraft and training of local responders in appropriate response. It was noted that, while there have only been 2 incidents within Scot County, there have been numerous others in surrounding communities. Pipeline safety is a concern due to the addition of pipeline infrastructure in the area and fears about the aftereffects of a pipeline incident. A final discussion was in regard to the lengthy amount of time it takes townships to clear their roads. The meeting facilitator suggested a study or analysis of which routes would benefit the most citizens if cleared first. Others suggested better equipment to clear snow in rural areas. 214IPage 397 Appendix G Completed Mitigation Actions from 2021 Plan # Hazard Mitigation Action Priority Type Time- frame Jurisdictions Responsible Agencies Possible Funding Est. Cost 2021 Mitigation Action Status 3 All Hazards Train and equip 1st responders to respond to mass -casualty events. Medium ES 2026-2030 Elko New Market Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Cnty/City/Twp Public Health Budget, Grants $50,000 Complete 4 All Hazards Train 1st responders and community officials on the National Incident Mgmt. System. Medium ES 2026-2030 Elko New Market Scott County EM; City Police & Fire Depts Cnty/City/Twp Budget $2,000 Complete 5 All Hazards Obtain & install emergency generators or "pigtails" for critical government facilities and fuel depots. Medium PP 2026-2030 Scott County, SMSC, Elko New Market, Jordan Scott County Public Works; City Public Works Depts Cnty/City/Twp Budget, Grants $500,000 Complete # Hazard Mitigation Action Priority Type Time- frame Jurisdictions Responsible Agencies Possible Funding Est. Cost 2026 Mitigation Action Status 27 Summer Storms, Winter Storms Modify zoning ordinances allowing temporary debris staging areas. Medium ES 2026-2030 Scott County Scott County Planning & Resource Management County Budget, Grants $5,000 Complete 38 Summer Storms, Winter Storms Install generator at the Elko New Market Police Department P Headquarters. High ES 2026-2030 Elko New Market Elko New Market Police Depts; Elko New Market City Administration FEMA HMA grant funding $9,000 Complete 81 Structure Fires Acquire and install six- inch water mains and hydrants communityw ide. High SI 2026-2030 Belle Plaine Scott County Public Works; City Public Works County/De t Budget pt g Grants $2,000,000 Complete 2151 age 398 116 All Hazards Purchase signage that can be used to direct the public during times of emergency Medium ES 2026-2030 Belle Plaine County and City Public Works County & City Budgets, Grants $150,000 Complete 121 All Hazards Create emergency Trauma Kits for responders in order to be prepared to quickly deploy & respond to various emergencies High ES 2026-2030 Scott County, Belle Plaine, Elko New Market, Prior Lake Sheriffs Office, City Police Departments County & City Budgets, Grants $40,000 Complete 2161 Wage 399 Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community Plans in Place > > z Ordinances Zoning Ordinance Y I Y I Y I Y I Y I Y I Y I Y I Y >- - J-4 >-4 >-> cu O U n0 C 'C Z >- > >- >- Funding Sources I Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community z >- z Shakopee Shakopee Savage >- > > >- > >- > cv OA ca cz >- > > Prior Lake -- > >- >- > J- >- Prior Lake z > > New Prague Y New Prague Elko New Market >- >" >" >-. Elko New Market Z >" >" Credit River Belle Plaine > > > > >.>- Belle Plaine z -- > Scott County Scott County Capabilities Comprehensive Community Plan Emergency Operations Plan Watershed plan/district Floodplain Ordinance Storm Water Ordinance Burning Ordinance Erosion Control Ordinance Capital Improvement Funding for Miti ation Authority to Levy Taxes Fees (taxes) for Water, Sewer, Gas, and/or Electric Services N- N z z z z aA 0 tt Vi Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community Building Officials I Y Y Y I Y Y I Y Y Y I Y Floodplain Officials I Y N N I N N I N N Y I Y Emergency Manager I Y Y N I Y Y I Y Y Y I Y Community Planner I Y Y Y I Y Y I Y Y Y I Y Civil Engineer I Y Y Y I Y Y I Y Y Y I Y >4 >. >4 >- Z z z L. O tt C 'C L. C C C.) cn 7. Shakopee >- a.) aA ca ca con > >- Prior Lake >- New Prague > >. Elko New Market >. >- Credit River >. -- Belle Plaine z z Scott County Special Fees for New Developments Storm Water Fees/Taxes Able to incur General Obligation Bonds or Special Taxes Community Development Block Grants v g Z >- aA Ca con z ox it ft as z �. z �. Z Z Z >- >- (=I 'C C N C Grant Writing Education and Outreach C) C CO N Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community z >- > > Shakopee z z z z ai OA cc tin z >- > z Prior Lake z >- >- z New Prague z >- >- z Elko New Market z › > z Credit River z Z z a 0:1 A. z z Scott County z >- ¢ z > Citizens Group Focusing on Preparedness, Environmental Protection, etc. Ongoing Public Education Programs Safety/Preparedness Programs in Schools NWS Storm Ready Certification Works Cited (2013). Adapting to Climate Change in Minnesota: 2013 Report of the Interagency Climate Adaptation Team. CC U z O O CC U "O O U O Li--, ci W a) "O a) > ca ) - U ctl CO U c-1 '„ ],," N cn cn bbA O '� N U C ° 3 �"j U S. �. cC a CD U iii U U C) bb EO CE .. a w = VS Cl.) V U ILI CZ Z O Cn CC V - = r—, Uj S. O on U) O cn U r--' "O U C.7 s. 0 VI v ct S. C1. "0 > —, Q al Tv' U U (73 i. CI.J N cC U U U tan O 0 O O V 0 U cu U C) z C) z U O O U .O CC U U C) Blume, P. (2014, June 24). Prior Lake flood fight could last until fall, mayor says. Retrieved from Fox9: http://www.myfoxtwincities.com/story/25851049/prior-lake-flood-fight-could-last-until-fallmayor-says Carlson, L. (2015, February 20). Flood study kicks off in Prior Lake. Retrieved from Prior Lake American: -O o > U `1-' N U U = 124 "0 O U V r--� w CZ 0 \"1 O U .--1 - N (/) a-+ UCZ CZ OCU ..0 UI CU 0U U 0 c) CO O cz as c� - - ,' U CC U O E - s. a CC E — N GJ o V N v] E -O O Q O + CZ N rU w cC cC x o as U N bA C/) CC can N - C z - - C V N 0 O CO o O E 4- }' 1/1 a o 4— � � Q" n N. b.0 d" O U O "O W C]. N. U O _ d" N V > c) a d - U "O N O sU O c r-1 \ N ) CU eM-{ LT V) 0 c `+ �O tt CJ U O U N �. U U Q11 Q" cC \ C+] O �• o r1 4 a. �. an o o a, o ca O a. - � N U a4 N _ +� �cl I N �_ = \ E as -0 o V E U a' U >, S.w 0 a-+ "0 s. a.c 1 cC 0 - CC cC \O S. +' V) O� rci o ,• \ CC i U U � o i F CU rx. bA cC r— U . U U \ �O yU CU "WMobi E U O cn cC v] c/? �_, - cC b.!) CC > N li U Q 11 = (t N Cr)c4 CO a: o '"--,"Ct O•� M �3 Q" 0. 0 E Q. rn V V L.) Q Q w w -0 N 0186/fema_mitigation_ideas_final508.pdf Gensini, V., & Brooks, H. (2018). Spatial Trends in United States Tornado Frequency. Climate and Atmospheric Science. b1) Cd v, 0 Cd U Cd bA y v, a) 4�, '.d a) Cll (1) CU a) U a) O U O ccS • Cd O O cC c -I N CU - o cai a, Georgakakos, A., Fleming, P., Dettinger, M., Peters-Lidard, C., Richmond, T., Reckhow, K., ... Yates, D. Gaon C) o_ 'C cd 4 ccl "CS U ¢, C.) a Cd C) sj o o bA U E cn a.) c0 Q. s O -O I= - V O 0. ca cts \ g a, —I U U O c�C a) as w nl V , U N _ r 1 - v -ON O a) N V Z Q. O a E • cC w ..OCC - C) C) w V 2 d N �N 0 cC cll -., E 't3 d �✓ O E .4 ,S„ ' a) CU a)I O~ al O CE Cd' "� - •*'I 1 U O d" vOi I- cC o Qo u ai it C) C) o U Z Q o -� :~ I z.ca O N 0 v) O O 0 = r1 C C) II = C Hca C o O ... U H U C) r�-i 4-,--, _ d = ,_ s vN O V O .� V 'I O C �" d n n n :~ rte•+ N w cC CO O O O O O Cd N UU.A Q E N N N U '. � O C +� s~ s~ z~ V CU CTS 4U-, O r-, r�-1 ^ \ E 3 '�' t1. Zvs +O-, +O-+ N a) V• Z Z = V a bA tat) O U U ¢+ U O. cu �,_ vi vi v) U U v) - O_ U O_ U O U O O +O•, rC C bA C bA tar) t] r 1 Cd -O -O vi I� -I C4 �I O \ a s Z 3 a 64 U. vi Q V M ¢; a; 3 :~ O V cts an an bfl +, cu International Climate Adaptation Team. (2013). Adapting to Climate Change in Minnesota. Klein, J. (2014, June 23). Blakeley homeowners get update on flood damage. Retrieved from KARE11: http://www.karel l.com/story/news/local/2014/06/2 3/blakeley-homeowners-get-update-flooddamage/11296391/ O Cd a) U cn Cd N CU a) 4-, E U Cd O a) M 1-1 N O O O Cr1 a) W a) a) CC Kunkel, K., Stevens, L., Stevens, S., Sun, L., Lfl CP ri C1 cn z O a) the U.S. National Climate Assessment. NO 4-, cn 0 a~ C a: o �. . U H j, S. LU co cu S:14C) "1:i a) - tx Q �, C O . U aG S� N - U ax N N co cu C) 4_' U � z s- a) a I. — N w cC r , O 4-,O ft 4-' v) C'n MC C = >~ C.) E w a) 4 o -o H o obn U a) O 0 V O U cn Li) 0 Cd >~ ,) 0 U .E7)O C a) O E N E a) C \ ' o CO bA 4; co cs.iE tx cd Cr, = \ w CSC, •(, Lti .- 'A" " 0 N CU) _ .� V \ + V �-' CU O r^, (n R' �' aC N a) CC I N .; N U ^ E N \ M +� N S. i N O \O —, a) 0 N 'C d" u -o ,= CZ) 4•' Q I I as o o E c_) = U < O x O o O o o oo C. s -,U .) i7.1. rcs C -1. a) +'' O c +-, Minneapolis St. Paul Regional Economic Development Partnership. (2015). Scott County. Retrieved April 21, 2015, from https://www.greatermsp.org/16-county/scott/ Minnesota Climatology Working Group. (2010, October 6). HydroClim Minnesota - October 2010. Retrieved from http://www.climate.umn.edu/doc/journal/hc1010.htm 0 a c� C — V b.0 cN a) o N O bA N cC Ca U co N N V Cd = _ O +.' U V U S-" \ bl) CU o V V N I W CU N = a) iSi Q 0 0 Cl, I, Gt, C coCri 4- id•C r-1 cn O O 0 s, O , ¢"cu N N a) 3 U Cd o\ Cd an ¢, O a Q E a = W Td E cZ co y Q. a, } aJ N O Cd ra U E E a) > aC Q U V V (A U C) a ca E w w O O �O O O0 to U C O Q" C W o F. --, w CCU o rU r' CZ © +, \ a .--1 dA .-� a-3 O C a) O O O 0 O co - z 0 CU a) o" 'o a.) • Eb => W co =a4 O C O M O ) Cd C 'O S~ W O U 'O U cp E d rti,g,x ra = ra U ,..- ra. °' cu 0 C) C Q -6' L en Ca o ca C o E �, © Cl) O \ O -a (/] U C1, C C C V Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. (2014). Retrieved from http://pcagis02.pca.state.mn.us/eda_surfacewater/ O.) E \ V) 76 0 C w w \ -C "O CC Cll al .0 � .) C bOA i:4 a4 Cri cn o O O Cli N N U Vj O c1 N os c-1 c —I C.) 4 o E "0 cn d"I Z O C O 00 •O = O O O N w +-Jvl w 4•Z., CZ) N •-, CC FC, 0 0 �° 0 0 0 C O C) CC CC V C CI w L) Cn .-0 C cn C Cn C8 CC C 'C C E CG C C' C E CC CC cn CD O d1 CC N- CC 4--' - O O is Ct E o o o a) a Z Z Q •F. z Z Q. Cv cn MN DNR. (2011). Retrieved from http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/forestry/wildfire/historialcharts/firesbyyear.pdf Cll 9 a) _ 0 Cn d' CllNi o 00 c M N. .0 O 00 -g co ,4— . O O vA N . G) O U CC N i CC Cv v] o C ^CO N E- '�., C C iC CC C cil CC O C C C cn ft - ^C Cv CC o . b.0 O O +4'' C J vl C ate' O N .-A O Cn -j CC 4' it — �' C) Hill Z \ z \ z i=iz z -• z E Cli C C 4-, C!) Cr) d" CC 4-, Ct C CC O a) C CC C) 4-, Cn C C MN DNR. (2015). Drought Monitor Overview. Retrieved from http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/140814_drought.html Cll C Cnl co 0 O bA b\ O A N C~ 4-, s, CCC C O 4) • U vI a �O U j CC h C VD C C CC O O CC b N CC C O \ v C 'a • 412 6 C V) is Z \ Q \ Z C MN DNR. (2017). Which Minnesota Communities Participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)? MN DNR. (2018, November 6). Minnesota Department of Natural Resources - List of Infested Waters - November 6, 2018. Retrieved from http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/eco/invasives/infested waters.pdf MN Environmental Quality Board. (2014). Minnesota and Climate Change: Our Tomorrow Starts Today. O O Ca 0 ( .� 0cn V CCs al O +_, ccs b• +'+ 4- C) 4—' O s� s� L) E m z N 3 � ^C7 cn O til Q U I CIA A bA O bb.0a.7cZ cn n• 0 o cn d 3—, OWO > 0 E 0 C. a N Cll \ N czi 0?j 02j w N cil p O. "O 0 V I n CV -0cd C) E E 4 O cn U O O 4—, N ON C) U 023 0Z �I a O �— %.:::, w c° x \ II V ^O 4 t\ cC Q L) - �� c s� w ON CG O O O N 023 ++ Ocb CNI i" X X 023• Cic O �J II II V Vcb v CSC C.7 .w O — to CU O C) O '7=1 O O c p vi r , s. s� s.. p Cs. W '4-, 4. 4-. 4-.• -d O 0 .,-I 'C Cn 'C ¢ N .11rC ') s•. V :O co > 023 > 023 > 023 t O U Cd r� S•. u N x x x > bA cn _ OCA V V O II O II O II O w G3' O GC O tY N O S. U p .4., in n n n v >C CZ cC + Q cn N r. N C N r.. '� Z v O O O aZ. O O U S?, a,a. O\ p d" O --, c'"; ,,--cO C I. O O O z cu z s� O - - rN O co W 4 z•. ++ - a=+ -cO •Z-1 'O o rl d' � N V O V O V O cl c� U z or -c Ca V \ \ \ cn 'O . crs vi CO N U C' • 3> 3> 3> E\ • p--. +-+ ,_z al M O O V G% H bOA H bOA H tan O O ,bA 0.+ cN V U U U U U U U C% CC t\ H cb -c n C-. O a) C.. C.. 4 S>. 4 3.• 4 C) cd > cu U CC Cn Cl) CU CLt n CU cMI n a) ct > O oO to U ¢ s . . s� s� cu in `~' CZ Cn Cn O cis til Cs0 c.) cis c..)cd c, 0 3 O V)w 'O .. to Cd s0. U U O 3 O s-,= cisV O O O a rCZ "O Cd '-C-'1C '.0 CZ 0 I .-Cl- - id \ cZ \ Z \ W O O •P— z O CCS O Cn O Cn O Cn N n Cn z CZ O co C C O 0 o z z z° z ,o z, z z o z a. tt 1 and Your Health. co 0 0 C) co vi c_) w co v) Li C) " O 4) F -LiQ >,, -� o o co a b. v) U co co o bn U o o 0' 0. U +•3 + N cn a) Q O H o U cn • 0 o6 r, U 0 CO CO $:1. U C) C V CU 0 C d" +5' C) �. V d\ a.) x NO O •3.. N N O V) ur .a. CO CZ M U Cll E 40.7 cn "O -cll U V] 71'Q O p tt Cll v) O \ CU CO O U U01. bcCb.°E co C) .". O 0 O _, 3O. co O C) bA c� U o Z z - cn N LT. . pA HH bA CO S�. CD C C C O a) • 0 \ 0 Q. :1. v) - Z , a) CO a) z. O .. O \ CC CCS CC ) v) \ Cn C) C) N "a 0~ "0 0 0 Q N 771+' \ a) +' nS. 0 +' co i a U a) V a) C) Sr - C) y N 0 H O aCU (73 _ U a) O U blo G) cs E Q OU nip •� f� a v Q ,--C U Cd 4) U nj 40) N l0 ON 0 bA O\ C C cn p p os cN �' U tC) `"' O U 4-7 Scott County. (2015). Silica Sand Mine Proposals in Scott County. Retrieved from Scott County: http://www.co.scott.mn.us/ParksLibraryEnv/Environment/EnvReview/Pages/Silica-Sand-Mining- Operations.aspx (1) +' CC E U c 0 4, E U S"" U U Sr "0 4, 0 CU O CU E o - CG cu U aJ U 3 U o co E a a U CT d w E bA +CC. o O O cC O U s. co (1) �' w - U bA 0 ca d. 0 C/7 > ,--1 bA O 0 cC 4J N 0 ' bA 0 w Cd C) sm. cu tan SJ bA +' "O 4) ca 4) a. Cd 0 - O o > ,4$O� C LS 0 Oa) cn O 0 -O v) U ccb o Li-, U +' a c1 a) as 01 co 0 C 0 Cd bo E r', a) O 0 O O cC a.) >n O 0 U U .O r' CD., 0 \> •� +U., 0 M Q O co LT. O 0 O O N x V� .0 U C� a) 0 .---, Sr w ,. Cr) a) r -A 'O U co tl] O U U U 4) \ +-+ ,--I U• w ^ \ E n O co 0 +' E O a) ,._.•4) no vi co 'n a) a) U z U ti r--, co Z U +-, co Q. '--+ M • s.. a �, �" sV) c) z~ li • O ' CA CU n. o b0A 7I,2+ O \O \ H \ VC Coq ¢' N Q. M M Lf) Ln CC bA E O w d \ 1-1 bp N O N � CC 'cs N \ L O 4-4 CG • CU O N C) o � O V cC C) \ Cll C Cr) c-1 O "O Cll 4-4 C) CU cn Cll O C/) O U 4--3 b�A CC U C) U O NI Cam• Cv CC C) C) M N O N Cll CC CU N U.S. Climate Data. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/gaylord/minnesota/united-states/usmn0287 O Cll CU C) • Cll Cll O x O U CU bA N CC 0 CU • O CL.) CC C/) c -I Cu w O GL O N O O 0 U O v C) O 0 bb. C) z M Cr) r -I O CU .O O C) Union of Concerned Scientists. (2009). Confronting Climate Change in the U.S. Midwest. USA.com. (2014). Gaylord, MN Weather. Retrieved from http://www.usa.com/gaylord-mn-weather.htm Wikipedia. (2006). Retrieved 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/August_24,_2006_tornado_outbreak Appendix I Scott County Plans & Programs in Place Plans/Programs Yes/N Comprehensive/Master Plan Yes Capital Improvements Plan Yes Economic Development Plan Yes Emergency Operations Plan Yes Continuity of Operations Plan Yes Transportation Plan Yes Community Wildfire Protection Plan No FireWise Program No Water Conservation/Emergency Preparedness Plan Yes Wellhead Protection Plan Database of dry hydrants/well access No Burning permits/restrictions Yes Water Management Plan Yes Zoning ordinance Yes Subdivision ordinance Yes Floodplain ordinance Yes Natural hazard specific ordinance (stormwater, steep slope, wildfire) Yes Flood insurance rate maps Yes Acquisition of land for open space and public recreation uses Yes School closing policy/communications plan in event of inclement weather/temperatures Yes Storm shelters (list all locations) No Warning sirens (list all locations) Yes SKYWARN Program Yes CodeRED Mass Notification System Yes Severe Weather Awareness Week Yes Winter Weather Awareness Week Yes NOAA Weather Radios No THIRA Yes Administration Yes/No Planning Commission Yes Mitigation Planning Committee Yes Maintenance programs to reduce risk (e.g., tree trimming, clearing drainage systems) Yes Mutual aid agreements Staff Yes/No Chief Building Official Yes Floodplain Administrator Yes 2271 410 Emergency Manager Yes ICommunity Planner I Civil Engineer Yes Yes j u m cooramator I Yes Technical 1- I ] Yes/No Warning systems/services (Reverse 911, outdoor warning signals) Yes Hazard data and information Yes Hazus analysis No Program/Organization Yes/No Local citizen groups or non-profit organizations focused on environmental protection, emergency preparedness, access and functional needs populations, etc. No Ongoing public education or information program (e.g., responsible water use, fire safety, household preparedness, environmental education) Yes Natural disaster or safety related school programs No StormReady certification Yes Firewise Communities certification No Public -private partnership initiatives addressing disaster -related issues No 2281 P age 411 U.S. Department of Homeland Security FEMA Region 5 536 S Clark St Chicago, IL 60605 FEMA May 11, 2026 Ms. Kristen Dellwo State Hazard Mitigation Officer Homeland Security and Emergency Management Minnesota Department of Public Safety 444 Cedar Street, Suite 223 Saint Paul, MN 55101 Dear Ms. Dellwo: The Hazard Mitigation Assistance Community Resilience Branch of FEMA Region 5 has determined the local mitigation plan meets all applicable FEMA mitigation planning requirements except its adoption by the participating jurisdictions of the Scott County 2026 Hazard Mitigation Plan. Mitigation plans may include additional content to meet Element H: Additional State Requirements or content the local government included beyond applicable FEMA mitigation planning requirements. Determination that the plan is Approvable Pending Adoption (APA) does not include the review or approval of content that exceeds the applicable FEMA mitigation planning requirements. An approved local mitigation plan, including adoption by the local government, is one of the conditions for applying for and/or receiving FEMA mitigation grants from the following programs: • Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) • HMGP Post -Fire • Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities • Flood Mitigation Assistance • Safeguarding Tomorrow Revolving Loan Fund Participating jurisdictions that adopt the plan more than one year after APA status has been issued must either: • Validate that their information in the plan remains current with respect to both the risk assessment (no recent hazard events, no changes in development) and their mitigation strategy (no changes necessary); or Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended; the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended; and National Dam Safety Program Act, as amended; 44 CFR Part 201, Mitigation Planning; and Local Mitigation Planning Policy Guide (FP -206-21-0002) 412 • Make necessary updates before submitting the adoption resolution to FEMA. We look forward to receiving the adoption resolution(s) and discussing options for implementing this mitigation plan. If there are any questions from either you or the communities, please contact Meg Burrows at (202) 769-6711 or meghan.burrows@fema.dhs.gov. Sincerely, flticul 114 Megan S. Hart Branch Chief Hazard Mitigation Assistance Community Resilience Enclosures: Plan Participant Status List and Local Plan Review Tool 413 Enclosure: Plan Participant Status List Below is the list of the approvable pending adoption jurisdictions in the referenced hazard mitigation plan. Please submit an adoption resolution for each jurisdiction to be included as an approved participant of the plan. Community Name Jurisdiction Status 1) Belle Plaine city 2) Elko New Market city 3) Jordan city 4) New Prague city 5) Prior Lake city 6) Savage city 7) Scott County 8) Shakopee city 9) Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community APA APA APA APA APA APA APA APA APA 414 Resolution No. R2026-083 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, RENEWING THE SCOTT COUNTY MULTI -HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, The City has participated in the hazard mitigation planning process as established under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000; and WHEREAS, the Act establishes a framework for the development of a multi - jurisdictional County Hazard Mitigation Plan; and WHEREAS, the Act as part of the planning process requires public involvement and local coordination among neighboring local units of government and businesses; and WHEREAS, the Scott County plan includes a risk assessment including past hazards, hazards that threaten the County, an estimate of structures at risk, a general description of land uses and development trends; and WHEREAS, the Scott County plan includes a mitigation strategy including goals and objectives and an action plan identifying specific mitigation projects and costs; and WHEREAS, the Scott County plan includes a maintenance or implementation process including plan updates, integration of the plan into other planning documents and how Scott County will maintain public participation and coordination; and WHEREAS, the plan has been shared with the Minnesota Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for review and comment; and 415 WHEREAS, the Scott County Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan will make the county and participating jurisdictions eligible to receive FEMA hazard mitigation assistance grants; and WHEREAS, this is a multi jurisdictional Plan and cities that participated in the planning process may choose to also adopt the County Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED that the City of Shakopee supports the hazard mitigation planning effort and wishes to adopt the Scott County All -Hazard Mitigation Plan. Passed in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 19th day of May 2026. Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attested: Richard Parsons, City Clerk 416 WILLA! SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.t May 19, 2026 Ordinance O2026-013 amending the Entertainment Overlay Zone to include additional properties. Amanda Schwabe, Planner Michael Kerski, Planning & Development Director Action to be considered: Adopt Ordinance O2026-013 Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: The City Council previously approved Ordinance O2024-004 establishing the Entertainment Overlay Zone for the Mystic Lake Amphitheater and the properties located immediately south of the venue. The purpose of the overlay district was to create additional flexibility related to signage, hours of operation, and entertainment -oriented uses in support of the emerging regional entertainment district. Staff is now proposing an expansion of the overlay district to include properties located adjacent to the existing boundary to the west and north associated with the Canterbury Park horse racing campus. Expanding the overlay will help ensure that future redevelopment within the remaining portions of the campus is compatible with the entertainment -focused development pattern previously approved by the City Council. In addition, the Shakopee Economic Development Authority recently approved a redevelopment planning contract with Gensler to evaluate and plan for additional redevelopment opportunities west of the current district boundary. The proposed expansion area would also be incorporated into the overlay district to provide consistent development standards and flexibility throughout the broader entertainment and mixed - use redevelopment area. Entertainment overlay districts similar in nature have been implemented in other nationally recognized entertainment destinations, including areas within Nashville, where zoning regulations are tailored to support large-scale entertainment, hospitality, and mixed -use development patterns comparable to the evolving Mystic Lake Amphitheater and Canterbury Park campus area. 417 The Shakopee Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at its May 7, 2026 meeting and voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of Ordinance O2026-013 to the City Council. Recommendation: Approved unanimously by the Planning Commission. Budget Impact: None Attachments: Ordinance O2026-013 Entertainment Overlay Zone Expansion Entertainment Overlay Zone Expansion Map Ordinance O2024-004 - Entertainment Overlay Zone 418 ORDINANCE O2026-013 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AMENDING THE ENTERTAINMENT OVERLAY ZONE TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL PROPERTIES WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee created the Entertainment Overlay Zone with Ordinance O2024-004 on February 24, 2024, to enhance the entertainment zone and create an active area for pedestrians around the Mystic Lake Amphitheater; and WHEREAS, the original district includes parcels legally described as PID 270810130, 271320010, 275270010, 275270040, 275270050, and 275270060; and WHEREAS, as the development of the area surrounding the Canterbury Park horse racing and gaming complex and the Mystic Lake Amphitheater continues, being part of the Entertainment Overlay District will provide additional opportunities related to outdoor dining, noise regulations, and signage to further a positive experience for patrons; and WHEREAS, the city is proposing to expand the entertainment overlay zone to include additional adjacent properties in the Major Recreation (MR) zoning district described as PID 275400010, 275400020, 275400030, 274760040, 275270030, 274060012, and 274060020; and WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on May 7, 2026, at which time all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council heard the matter at its meeting on May 19, 2026; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, that the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota hereby adopts the following: PID 275400010, 275400020, 275400030, 274760040, 275270030, 274060012 and 274060020 shall be included in the Entertainment Overlay Zone. Passed in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held on the 19th day of May, 2026. Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: Richard Parsons, City Clerk Published in the New Prague Times on the day of , 2026. 419 Entertainment Overlay Zone Expansion Ordinance O2024-004 0 N 6 (7 T m 2 m Q d a o 63 a g € co d E ¢ E 3g E m rco w ,. A 5 E vw E 2',U d y CO J o Proposed Expansion ORDINANCE O2024-004 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, APPROVING AN ENTERTAINMENT OVERLAY ZONE WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee seeks to create a vibrant entertainment zone around the amphitheater and create an active area for pedestrians; and WHEREAS, the property is legally described as PD 270810130, 271320010, 275270010, 275270040, 275270050, 275270060, WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on February 8, 2024, at which time all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council that the Entertainment Overlay Zone be adopted as conditioned in this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council heard the matter at its meeting on March 6, 2024; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, that the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota hereby adopts the following: That 130.45 Noise Elimination and Noise Prevention section of the Code, is amended for the Entertainment Overlay Zone to extend hours until 11:30PM, seven days a week and outdoor dining is allowed. That 151.196 Sign Design Standards Table, is amended to allow neon, blade, digital and large video (with movement) signs, subject to the following: • Large scale video and/or digital signs must be reviewed by the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council • Blade, digital and neon signs that are larger in square footage than allowed by the current code must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission • Blade, digital and neon size that conform to the sign code in size may be approved by staff. Passe in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee on March 6, 2024. Mayor of the City of Shakopee Published in the Shakopee Valley News on the day of , 2024. 421 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 8.a May 19, 2026 Fire Department 2025 Year in Review Joe Simon, Fire Chief Action to be considered: No action required. Motion Type: Informational only Background: The 2025 Year in Review captures a defining chapter in the history of the Shakopee Fire Department. Over the past year, the department successfully navigated a historic transition from a combination model reliant primarily on part-time and on -call staff to a career department that now provides 24/7 staffing across both fire stations. This evolution was made possible through the unified support of the Mayor and City Council, City Administration, and other City departments, all of whom recognized that the city's rapid growth necessitated a more robust and dependable emergency response model. A cornerstone of this transformation was the successful acquisition of a $2.6 million federal Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) grant from FEMA. This grant, which was pursued with the support of city leadership, provides the essential funding to hire 12 additional full-time firefighters. This federal investment covers 65% of salary and benefit costs in the first two years and 35% in the third, allowing the city to scale its public safety infrastructure responsibly. This shift in the staffing model directly addresses the challenges posed by a call volume that has doubled since 2018 (from 910 calls to 2,012). By moving to a career model, the department is projected to significantly reduce response times. The collaborative efforts between the Fire Department and other city teams, from Human Resources in managing the hiring of new staff members to Finance in managing the grant's long-term sustainability, demonstrate a shared commitment to the safety and well-being of Shakopee residents. The Fire Department 2025 Year in Review serves as a record of these accomplishments and a roadmap for a future where Shakopee is better protected and better prepared. 422 Recommendation: This item is presented for informational purposes and staff recommends the Mayor and Council review the Fire Department 2025 Year in Review. This commemorative document highlights the acceptance of the SAFER grant and successful transformation into a career department augmented with dedicated part-time firefighters. This shift provides 24/7 staffing across both fire stations, significantly improving life safety and property protection for the City of Shakopee. Budget Impact: There is no budget impact for the acceptance of this informational report. Attachments: Fire Department 2025 Year in Review.pdf 423 SHAKOPEE FIRE DEPARTMENT 2025 YEAR IN REVIEW 424 C TABLE OF CONTENTS Message from the Fire Chief 3 MissionNalues 4 Fire Department Organization5-6 Fire Department Divisions 7-8 Emergency Incidents 9-14 Permits, Plan Reviews, and Inspections 15 Training 16 Specialized Teams 17 Community Outreach 18 Firefighter Safety 19 Maintenance Activity 20 Strengthening Our Community ........... 21 Vehicles and Equipment... 22-23 Growing with Shakopee.... . 24 Cover Photo: Fire officers Justen Riley and Dave Giddings collaborate on tactical strategies at the MN Renaissance Festival fire. Design/Layout: Deb Noble, Communications Specialist Shakopee Fire Department CONTACT US FIRE CHIEF Joe Simon jsimon@ShakopeeMN.gov DEPUTY CHIEF Dave Giddings dgiddings@ShakopeeMN.gov Justen Riley jriley@ShakopeeMN.gov FIRE MARSHAL Tom Pitschneider tpitschneider@ShakopeeMN.gov Taylor Dzierzak tdzierzak@ShakopeeMN.gov ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Amber Cunningham acunningham@ShakopeeMN.gov CAPTAIN Rob Indrebo rindrebo@ShakopeeMN.gov Corey Murray cmurray@ShakopeeMN.gov Tim Nordstrom tnordstrom@ShakopeeMN.gov FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE INSPECTOR O 0 0 aM Fire Station 1: 2700 Vierling Dr. E., Shakopee, MN 55379 Fire Station 2: 1001 Vierling Dr. W., Shakopee, MN 55379 Phone 952-233-9570 Fax 952-233-3857 Email firesafety@ShakopeeMN.gov Website ShakopeeMN.gov/fire FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA: f @ShakopeeFD 2 I Shakopee Fire Department 425 """ A MESSAGE FROM THE FIRE CHIEF As we close out 2025, I am proud to reflect on a year of growth, resilience, and service for the Shakopee Fire Department. This year marked a historic achievement: we were awarded a federal SAFER grant that will allow us to add 12 full-time firefighters to our team.This investment in our department is not only a recognition of our commitment to public safety, but also a promise to the Shakopee community that we will continue to meet its needs with strength and professionalism. The impact of increased on -duty staffing has already been evident. With more firefighters available on scene, we are consistently containing fires to the room of origin. This means homes are not being destroyed, families are spared the devastation of losing their entire residence, and countless valuables and memories are being saved. Just as importantly, by arriving more quickly to medical incidents, we are providing a higher level of service to the community and saving lives when seconds truly matter. Beyond emergency response, 2025 was a year of continued focus on training, community outreach, and culture building within the department. We strengthened partnerships with other city departments, city officials, and neighboring agencies, ensuring that Shakopee remains prepared for any challenge. We also honored our history by engaging with retired firefighters, reminding us that our future is built on the foundation they laid. Looking ahead to 2026, we are excited to welcome new members into our ranks, continue modernizing our operations, and deepen our commitment to Shakopee. The SAFER grant is more than funding; it is an opportunity to shape the next chapter of our department's story. To our firefighters, city staff, council members, and community: thank you for your trust, support, and partnership. Together, we are making Shakopee safer, stronger, and more resilient. Sincerely, dee 1:1426-tt Joe Simon Shakopee Fire Chief 2025 Year in Review I :426 Mission Statement The mission of the Shakopee Fire Department is to provide effective, efficient, and innovative fire and rescue protection services. We are committed to the safety of the community through the delivery of public education, code enforcement, fire suppression, and rescue services. Vision The vision of the Shakopee Fire Department is to be a progressive organization that leads the community in public safety using a professional, reliable, predictable, and sustainable staffing model. Core Values PRIDE Respect our traditions, preserve our history, recognize achievements, and embrace innovation HONOR Exhibit strength in character and personal integrity at all times INTEGRITY Maintain the highest ethical standards and honesty SERVICE Act in the best interest of the safety of our community Jurisdiction size: 51.5 sq. miles Jurisdiction Population (Shakopee, Louisville Township, and Jackson Township): 55,000 Number of visitors to area attractions in 2025: 11,000,000 QUICK FACTS: Did You Know? Shakopee's first fire department was created in 1883 after fires in the 1870s destroyed many homes and businesses. Total number of incidents in 2025: 2,012 Percent increase of incidents since 2024: 4% Total number of call-backs: 107 Number of simultaneous incidents: 182 (8%) 4 I Shakopee Fire Department 427 """, FIRE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION FIREFIGHTERS Macau ley Bartells Danny Bouavichith Kylee Breeggemann Tom Breeggemann Jacob Coughlin Peter Czech Eric Dircks Darren Giese Danielle Heier Keith Heinzen Zak Hoffman Brad Horsmann Keith Jellinger Dann Kasallis Sarah Keller Tim Mahoney Desirae Munsinger Corey Murray Todd Nellermoe Austin Palmer Sam Peterson Brad Purrington Mason Runyan Dominick Schleper Adam Schmitz Sam Schwaesdall Zach Schwaesdall Jay Sims Andy Toczek Tony Truong AMBER CUNNINGHAM Admin. Assistant JUSTEN RILEY Deputy Chief JOE SIMON Fire Chief • I • AVE GIDDINGS TOM PITSCHNEIDER Fire Marshal TAYLOR DZIERZAK Fire Inspector rmicwor Aiati ROB INDREBO COREY MURRAY TIM NORDSTROM Captain Full -Time Firefighters Captain Full -Time Firefighters Captain Full -Time Firefighters Deputy Chief KENT ANGLIN Lieutenant KEVIN PASS Lieutenant Part -Time Firefighters 2025 Year in Review I ! 428 FIRE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION Firefighters work together to organize equipment and manage hoses at the scene of an incident. STAFFING: BYTHE NUMBERS The Shakopee Fire Department is a combination department with 15 full-time and 25 part-time staff. The administrative team, including the Fire Chief, Deputy Chiefs, Fire Marshal, Fire Inspector, and Administrative Assistant, work a standard 40 -hour week, with additional coverage responsibilities during nights and weekends. Response operations are maintained by three rotating full-time shifts working 24 -hour cycles, each led by a Captain and two Firefighters. These crews are further supplemented by part- time personnel during both day and night hours to ensure consistent coverage. Daily staffing at Station 1 typically ranges from a minimum of three personnel to a maximum of four, allowing the department to operate either a single Engine or both an Engine and a Rescue unit. In contrast, Station 2 is currently unstaffed and relies entirely on emergency call-backs to respond to incidents. This call-back system is essential for managing high call volumes or complex emergencies. In 2025, the department initiated 107 emergency call-backs, with an average of eight firefighters responding per call-back. TOTAL STAFFING Fire Chief 1 Deputy Chief 2 Fire Marshal 1 Fire Inspector 1 Administrative Assistant 1 Captain 3 Full-time Firefighter 6 Part-time Firefighter 25 Total: 40 DAILY STAFFING Admin Staff (M —F, 8 a.m.-4:30 p.m.) 6 Maximum Daily Line Staff (24 -hour) 4 Minimum Daily Line Staff (24 -hour) 3 Percent ofTime at Minimum Staffing 34% Average Emergency Call -Back Response 8 6 I Shakopee Fire Department 429 """ FIRE DEPARTMENT DIVISIONS Fire department operations encompass a wide range of activities aimed at preventing and mitigating fires and other emergencies. ADMINISTRATION The Administration Division of the Shakopee Fire Department, led by the Fire Chief, is responsible for the strategic oversight of the department. This division ensures compliance with state and federal regulations while overseeing critical functions such as recruitment, retention, personnel management, and scheduling. Additionally, it handles payroll, maintains departmental policies, and is responsible for developing and managing the annual budget, ensuring that financial resources are allocated efficiently to meet the needs of the department and the community it serves. Fire Chief Joe Simon's badging ceremony on September 4, 2025. OPERATIONS The Operations Division, led by Deputy Chief Justen Riley, is essentially the heart of the department's emergency response capabilities. It's responsible for the "boots on the ground"actions that directly protect the community. Here's a breakdown of their key responsibilities: ■ Fire Suppression:This is the core function, involving extinguishing fires in structures, vehicles, and wildland areas. Firefighters use various techniques, including water application, foam application, and ventilation. ■ Emergency Medical Services (EMS): Firefighters provide emergency medical care to the public: — Basic life support (BLS): Providing medical care such as CPR and first aid. - Emergency Medical Technician (EMT): All Shakopee firefighters are trained to this level, providing critical medical assistance to people in need. ■ Rescue Operations: Firefighters are trained to rescue people from a variety of hazardous situations, such as vehicle extrication, water rescues, and confined space rescues. ■ Hazardous Materials Response: Firefighters are equipped to handle incidents involving hazardous materials, such as chemical spills and leaks. ■ Equipment and Technology: A wide range of specialized equipment is utilized and maintained, including fire engines, ladders, rescue tools, breathing apparatus, and much more. ■ Incident Command System (ICS): A standardized system for managing emergency incidents, ensuring effective communication and coordination among responders. Shakopee firefighters are trained and operate using the Blue Card Incident Command Training and Certification Program designed to train and certify firefighters to serve as Incident Commanders (ICs) for local events. Shakopee Fire Department has successfully onboarded early to the National Emergency Response Information System (NERIS), a modernized, cloud -based replacement for the 50 -year -old National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS). As part of a nationwide shift occurring throughout 2025, NERIS introduces significant improvements to fire service reporting: ■ Near Real -Time Analytics: Unlike the legacy system, which often had long data lags, NERIS provides immediate situational awareness and predictive tools for all -hazard preparedness. ■ Modernized Interface:The system moves away from complex numeric codes to a more intuitive, "plain language" interface designed specifically for first responders on mobile devices and tablets. ■ Enhanced Data Integration: NERIS connects directly with Computer -Aided Dispatch (CAD) and Records Management Systems (RMS) to reduce manual entry and administrative burdens. ■ Targeted Reporting: It is specifically designed to track emerging 21st -century risks, such as lithium -ion battery fires and wildland-urban interface incidents. Firefighter Dann Kasallis maintains critical focus on pump operations to ensure consistent water flow during a garage fire response. 2025 Year in Review I :430 FIRE DEPARTMENT DIVISIONS TRAINING The Training Division, led by Deputy Chief Dave Giddings, plays a crucial role in ensuring that firefighters are well -prepared to handle a wide range of emergencies. It's responsible for maintaining the competency and readiness of the fire Shakopee Fire and SandVenture lifeguards perform joint training for water emergencies. department's personnel, ensuring that they are prepared to protect the community and their duties encompass: ■ Providing Initial and Ongoing Training ■ Ensuring Compliance with Standards ■ Developing and Updating Training Programs ■ Promoting Safety ■ Specialized Training Shakopee Fire personnel engage in a high-fidelity EMS training simulation to practice the critical skills and specialized care required for emergency field deliveries. FIRE PREVENTION AND PUBLIC EDUCATION Under the direction of Fire Marshal Tom Pitschneider, the Fire Prevention and Public Education Division focuses on proactively reducing the occurrence and impact of fires and other emergencies.This division aims to prevent fires and other emergencies from happening in the first place and educate the public on how to stay safe in the event of an emergency. By combining proactive prevention measures with public education, we can significantly reduce the number of fires and injuries in the community. Here's a breakdown of the division's key functions: Fire Prevention: ■ Inspections: - Conducting inspections of commercial and residential buildings to identify and correct fire hazards. - Enforcing fire codes and regulations. ■ Plan Review: - Reviewing building plans to ensure they meet fire safety standards. ■ Hazard Assessment: - Identifying and mitigating potential fire hazards within the community. Public Education: ■ Community Outreach: - Providing educational programs to schools, businesses, and community groups on fire safety topics. - Distributing fire safety information and materials. ■ Fire Safety Training: - Teaching people how to prevent fires, how to react in case of a fire, and how to use fire extinguishers. - Promoting the importance of smoke detectors and escape plans. ■ Risk Reduction: - Working to reduce the community's risk of many hazards, not just fire, but also things like falls, and other home safety. 8 I Shakopee Fire Department 431 """ EMERGENCY INCIDENTS INCIDENT ANALYSIS The total number of incidents for 2025 was 2,012, an increase of 74 incidents from the prior year. The Fire Department responds to a variety of incidents, which the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS) classifies into nine incident types. 2025 INCIDENT TYPE BREAKDOWN Incident Type Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Total Fire 10 5 9 13 10 6 12 9 6 5 8 10 103 Explosion/Overheat 6 0 3 1 2 1 4 1 3 5 3 0 29 Rescue/EMS 55 83 75 73 79 86 76 72 63 87 90 122 961 Hazardous Conditions 11 9 7 6 10 14 13 13 7 5 8 1 104 Public Service 9 21 23 18 22 15 20 16 18 20 16 15 213 Good Intent 22 13 17 26 19 17 23 25 37 39 37 11 286 Alarm Activations 33 31 20 22 22 26 17 25 28 29 23 37 313 Weather/Disasters 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Special Incident 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Total 1 146 162 154 159 164 168 165 161 162 190 185 196 2,012 Change from 2024 -1 -10 -1 +30 +21 -20 -28 -12 -7 +6 +37 +59 +74 FIRE 103 INCIDENTS (5%) Of the 2,012 emergency incidents in 2025, 103 (5%) of them were classified under the NFIRS as fires. Fires in Building Includes structure fires, contents or equipment fires, and cooking fires confined to container or that only produced smoke. Vehicle Fires 13 (13% of fires) Includes fires in any type of mobile property including cars, trucks, and off -road vehicles. 55 (53% of fires) EXPLOSION/OVERHEATING Grass or Natural Vegetation Fires 18 (17% of fires) Includes fires in grass areas, wildland areas, and farm crop fields. Trash, Rubbish, Dumpster, and Other Outside Fires 17 (17% of fires) Includes trash fires inside buildings that were confined to the container and trash and rubbish or dumpster fires outside. 29 INCIDENTS (1%) Emergency incidents of explosion/overheating consist of mostly burnt food. Typically, these are received as fire alarms or someone calls 911 because they smell smoke. These types of incidents are considered emergencies because they can quickly escalate to fires. Firefighters Andy Toczek and Keith Jellinger on the scene of the Minnesota Renaissance Festival fire. 2025 Year in Review I <432 EMERGENCY INCIDENTS RESCUE & EMS 961 INCIDENTS (48%) Rescue & EMS incidents include: Potentially life -threatening medical emergencies, injuries, or persons trapped where they cannot escape without assistance or danger of bodily harm. Medicals 775 (80% of Rescue & EMS) Firefighters perform Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) care, assist with patient care, and assist the ambulance crew in route to the hospital. All firefighters are trained to the EMT level and provide advanced life support services during many incidents. Specialized Rescue 26 (3% Rescue & EMS) Some of the less common but vital rescue services provided include water surface rescue and underwater diving, ice rescue and under ice diving, rope and high -angle rescue, confined space rescue, and missing person searches. HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS Vehicle Crashes 160 (17% of Rescue & EMS) Along with patient care, medical care, and transportation assistance, firefighters also respond to vehicle crashes to check for injuries and extricate injured and trapped patients from their vehicles. Services provided at such incidents may include spine stabilization, the application of a backboard and C -Collar, gathering patient information and baseline vitals, disassembling the damaged vehicle with power extrication tools, patient removal, traffic control, and clean-up of debris. 104 INCIDENTS (5%) Emergency incidents of hazardous conditions include combustible or flammable liquid spills and leaks; chemical release, reaction, or toxic condition; electrical wiring or equipment problem; biological hazards; and industrial accidents. PUBLIC SERVICE 213 INCIDENTS (11%) Emergency incidents for public service primarily consist of public assists. Some firefighters are certified car seat technicians and car seat installation services count towards public service. Other public services include assisting with persons in distress, smoke problems, water problems, home fire safety checks, and unauthorized burning. GOOD INTENT 286 INCIDENTS (14%) Good intent incidents include calls that are dispatched and subsequently cancelled in route; wrong location or no emergency found; controlled burns; steam or gas mistaken for smoke; and hazardous materials incidents where none were present. ALARM ACTIVATIONS 313 INCIDENTS (16%) When an alarm is activated, there's always potential for smoke, fire, or other hazardous material conditions to be present on arrival. Some incidents can be attributed to the use of monitored fire alarm systems in commercial and residential structures while others are faulty residential smoke detectors and/or carbon monoxide alarms. Braving the elements to sharpen life- saving skills, our firefighters master critical vehicle extrication techniques during a winter training exercise. 10 I Shakopee Fire Department 433 J EMERGENCY INCIDENTS INCIDENTS AND STAFFING BY YEAR Firefighters working as a team to extinguish fires at the Minnesota Renaissance Festival fire. EMERGENCY INCIDENTS BREAK DOWN OF INCIDENTS BY DAY OF WEEK INCIDENTS BY HOUR OF DAY Total Incidents 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 79 90 87 48 42 I 1 1 ri 1 1 1 1 1 1 43 108 92 105 109 109 116 118 144 120 117 91 82 '6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hours of Day 12 I Shakopee Fire Department 435 """ EMERGENCY INCIDENTS INCIDENTS BY DISTRICT District 2024 2025 City of Shakopee 1,831 1,918 Jackson Township 41 27 Louisville Township 42 40 Out of District/Mutual Aid 24 27 Total 1,938 2,012 INCIDENT TYPE DETAILS Incident Type 2024 2025 100 -Fire 106 103 200-Explosion/Overheat 30 29 300—Rescue/EMS 857 961 400 -Hazardous Conditions 122 104 500 -Public Service 253 213 600 -Good Intent 250 286 700 —Alarm Activations 318 313 800 - Weather/Disasters 0 3 900 -Special Incident 2 0 Total 1,938 2,012 MUTUAL AID SUMMARY Aid Given or Received 2024 2025 Mutual aid given 24 31 Automatic aid given 4 2 Mutual aid received 18 46 Automatic aid received 24 18 None 1,868 1,915 Total 1,938 2,012 *Automatic Aid —sent by dispatch on initial alarm. 2025 Year in Review I 1? 436 EMERGENCY INCIDENTS FIRE LOSS Fire loss is attributed to both property loss and contents loss. As part of the fire investigation process, estimated values and loss of property and contents are determined. The overall fire loss is calculated based on these estimates. The total fire loss for 2025 was $1,155,758 and can be broken down as follows: • Building Fires: $883,000 • Vehicle Fires: $260,733 • Other: $12,025 DOLLAR VALUE SAVED AND LOST Value/Loss 2025 Total Value $203,597,745 Total Loss $1,155,758 Total Saved $202,441,987 Value saved and loss are determined from estimated property values, web -based vehicle value searches, and insurance records. The total percent of value saved for 2025 was: 99.43% 2025 MAJOR LOSS FIRES —LOSS GREATER THAN $25,000 Date Incident Type Total Loss Total Value 1/21/2025 Building Fire $90,000 $143,000 1/31/2025 Building Fire $100,000 $1,597,580 4/17/2025 Building Fire $150,000 $5,879,800 5/2/2025 Building Fire $95,000 $114,300 7/28/2025 Vehicle Fire $150,000 $150,000 9/11/2025 Vehicle Fire $45,000 $45,000 9/18/2025 Building Fire $100,000 $118,200 10/22/2025 Building Fire $75,000 $166,700 11/9/2025 Building Fire $95,000 $299,500 11/19/2025 Building Fire $50,000 $568,000 Captain Tim Nordstrom and Firefighter Sam Schwaesdall work to suppress hotspots following a fire at the Minnesota Renaissance Festival grounds. -....., - ;,., __ SI akopee Fire artment - - - • -.: = 437 """ PERMITS, PLAN REVIEWS, AND INSPECTIONS PERMITS The Shakopee Fire Department issues fire permits to enhance public safety and minimize the risk of uncontrolled fires. It's a vital tool aimed to prevent fires, protect the public, and ensure the safety of the community. In 2025, 187 fire permits with a $2,590,689.58 valuation were issued in the following categories: Sprinkler Systems: 80 Fire Alarm Systems: 34 Other: 73 $H • • • PLAN REVIEWS Plan reviews are a crucial part of fire prevention and life safety and a vital step in ensuring that buildings are constructed and renovated in a way that minimizes fire risks and protects the safety of occupants. In 2025, the department completed 361 plan reviews that included fire, building, and planning projects. Planning/Zoning: 22 Building/Fire: 339 INSPECTIONS The department conducts fire inspections as a proactive measure to help prevent fires, protect lives, and ensure the safety of the community. Key motivations are code enforcement, hazard identification, fire prevention, life safety, property protection, public education, risk reduction, and insurance requirements. The department completes inspections for all fire permits issued as well as commercial building permits and liquor and tobacco licenses. In 2025, a total of 627 inspections were completed by the Fire Marshal, Fire Inspector, and firefighters. Fire Permit Inspections: 416 Building Permit Inspections: 71 Liquor and Tobacco License Inspections: 140 In 2025, the department reached a significant milestone with the hiring of Taylor Dzierzak as its first full-time Fire Inspector. This newly established role marks a proactive shift in community risk reduction, providing a dedicated resource to support the Fire Marshal in comprehensive code enforcement and public education. Taylor's responsibilities include conducting rigorous building inspections for fire code compliance, reviewing plans, and coordinating projects with city stakeholders to ensure safety across our growing infrastructure. Beyond enforcement, his role is pivotal in developing and implementing specialized fire prevention programs for local schools and businesses. This addition allows for more consistent oversight and expanded outreach, ensuring a safer environment for all who live and work in the community. 2025 Year in Review I 1= 438 Viii®®ff TRAINING TRAINING The Fire Department spends more time training than any other task or responsibilities.There are many training standards for firefighters, including requirements from the Minnesota Fire Service Certification Board (MFSCB), Minnesota Board of Firefighter Training and Education (MBFTE), Minnesota Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians (NREMT), and the Minnesota Emergency Medical Services Regulatory Board (EMSRB). Shakopee firefighters undergo training daily while on shift (company training). They also complete weekly department training and external training. Topics covered range from fire suppression to leadership. In 2025, the Shakopee Fire Department completed 3,799 personnel hours of training. Training highlights in 2025 included: Incident Command In 2025, the department certified 4 members in Blue Card Incident Command certification program. This program is designed to train, evaluate, and certify firefighters and officers as incident commanders for NIMS Type 4 and 5 (single and multi -alarm structure fires). Over 60 hours of training is required for each member. Firefighters Todd Nellermoe and Peter Czech utilize the department's new door prop to refine the precision and strength required for rapid forced entry. Shakopee firefighters participate in credential training to master the clinical application and protocol of nebulizer treatments. Firefighters practicing low -angle rope rescue techniques along the banks of the Minnesota River. 16 I Shakopee Fire Department 439 """ SPECIALIZED TEAMS SPECIALIZED TEAMS The technical rescue team receives additional training in repelling, high -angle rescue, and confined space rescue. Using rescue rope, harnesses, and an assortment of hardware, this team is able to perform specialized rescues from buildings, towers, confined spaces, and wilderness areas. The water/ice dive rescue team receives additional training in open water, ice, and SCUBA dive rescue emergencies. Using specialized water, ice rescue, and SCUBA diving equipment, this team is able to perform all types of water and ice rescue. High -Angle Rescue Training Over the past year, the Shakopee Fire Department's Technical Rescue Team continued to build on its strong foundation through advanced, hands-on training opportunities and regional collaboration. Team members trained alongside multiple fire departments and specialized rescue teams, strengthening both individual skillsets and interagency coordination. Throughout these training events, participants focused on high - angle rescue operations, rope systems, and complex scenario - based problem solving. Crews applied their knowledge in realistic environments that challenged their adaptability, communication, and technical proficiency. Training scenarios included elevated structures, confined spaces, and dynamic outdoor settings designed to replicate real -world rescue incidents. In addition to enhancing technical capabilities, these trainings reinforced the importance of teamwork and interoperability with partner agencies. By working closely with other departments, Shakopee Fire continues to foster strong relationships and share best practices with regional experts. This ongoing commitment to technical rescue training ensures that our personnel remain prepared to safely and effectively respond to complex rescue situations within our community and beyond. Firefighters Brad Purrington and Dominick Schleper navigate the currents of the Mississippi River during Rescue Swimmer Certification training hosted by the South Metro and Burnsville Fire Departments. Firefighters Brad Purrington and Dominick Schleper practice essential water rescue and victim transport maneuvers during their Rescue Swimmer Certification training. Members of the Shakopee High -Angle Rescue team practice patient stabilization and complex rope rigging maneuvers. Shakopee firefighters practice complex vertical maneuvers and patient stabilization during high -angle rope rescue training at Rahr Malting. 2025 Year in Review I 1; 440 COMMUNITY OUTREACH PUBLIC EDUCATION Public education is centered around the goal of creating a safer community. The Shakopee Fire Department is involved in a variety of events, classes, and community gatherings throughout the year, which allows the team to bring safety messages to a diverse array of audiences. Throughout the year, firefighters guide various community, youth, and civic groups on tours of the fire stations, Firefighter Todd Nellermoe provides an fire truck tour for third graders at Sweeney Elementary. accompanied by fire safety education information. Each October, firefighters support Fire Prevention Week activities. Firefighters also present fire safety programs at several off -site locations throughout the year upon request. This includes meetings with business owners, property managers, special needs residents, schools, and senior living facilities. Shakopee fire partner with Shakopee Parks and Recreation for the Wing Ding "Little Firefighter" program to teach local youth about essential firefighting gear and safety. COMMUNITY EVENTS During October, the department hosts its annual Fire Station Open House, providing public education and hands on activities to more than 1,000 residents. In a strong partnership with Shakopee Parks and Recreation, we coordinate fire safety events for preschool aged children. During the summer months we host a series of free pop-up splash pads at parks around the community. Future firefighters in training at our annual open house. INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE (ISO) The ISO (Insurance Services Office) rating of a fire department, also known as a Public Protection Classification (PPC), is a crucial metric that reflects a community's fire protection capabilities. The ISO rating assesses how well the department and its surrounding community are equipped to handle fires. Insurance companies use these ratings to help determine property insurance premiums. Achieving a high ISO rating (1, 2, or 3) requires significant investment in fire department resources, water infrastructure, and emergency communications. In 2020, the Shakopee Fire Department earned a Class 3 ISO rating. 18 I Shakopee Fire Department 441 """ FIREFIGHTER SAFETY AIR MONITORING Using air quality monitoring instruments, firefighters can test for hazardous environments such as carbon monoxide, natural gas, propane, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, chlorine, and oxygen deficient air. Air monitoring is used to determine carbon monoxide or gas levels when alarms sound or odd smells are reported. FIREFIGHTER HEALTH Shakopee firefighters receive annual health screenings, including blood testing, vision, hearing, resting electrocardiogram, lung capacity, and proper respirator fit. INCIDENT COMMAND The department employs the nationally recognized Blue Card Incident Command Program for emergency operations. Designed to manage smaller National Incident Management System (NIMS) Type 4 and 5 incidents, the Blue Card program simplifies the incident command system by establishing best practices, standardized terminology, clear communication processes, and defined expectations for each ICS role. It provides a foundational ICS framework that can seamlessly integrate into more significant and complex NIMS Type 1-3 incidents. The NIMS system allows for the easy integration of external agencies into the overall emergency operation. BLUE,fir PERSONNEL ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM To assure firefighter safety in every environment, the department continues to utilize a personnel accountability system for which the division officer, operations officer, and incident commander are responsible. The system ensures every firefighter working at an incident scene is accounted for. Also, each firefighter is equipped with a Personal Alert Safety System (PASS) device. The PASS monitors a firefighter's activity while they are in a building or hazardous area and sounds an alarm should they become trapped, injured, or lost.The alarm assists other firefighters in locating and removing a distressed firefighter. 2025 Year in Review I 11442 VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE The Fire Department manages the maintenance for all department vehicles and equipment, with staff performing inspections, preventative maintenance, and repairs. Any other maintenance and repairs are completed by the Public Works Department mechanic shop. STATION MAINTENANCE The Fire Department manages the facility maintenance of two fire stations. Firefighters are responsible for preventive maintenance, inspections, planning for repairs as needed, and completing minor repair work. Work requiring time or skills not available within the department is completed by City maintenance staff or local vendors. Fire Station 1 was constructed in 1998 and is located at 2700 Vierling Dr. E., Shakopee. Fire Station 2 was constructed in 2012 and is located at 1001 Vierling Dr. W., Shakopee. 20 I Shakopee Fire Department 443 """ STRENGTHENING OUR COMMUNITY STRENGTHENING OUR COMMUNITY:THE IMPACT OF THE SAFER GRANT ON SHAKOPEE FIRE DEPARTMENT In 2025, the Shakopee Fire Department was awarded a highly competitive Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) grant from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). This grant marks a transformative moment for our department and the Shakopee community, enabling us to expand our staffing and enhance emergency services in critical areas of the city. The SAFER grant provides funding to hire additional full- time firefighters, allowing us to staff Fire Station 2 on a 24/7 basis for the first time starting in March 2026. Located in West Shakopee, Station 2 has long served as a strategic asset, but limited staffing meant that response capabilities were constrained. With this new funding, we will now deploy crews from Station 2 around the clock, dramatically improving our ability to respond to emergencies quickly and effectively. Reducing Response Times, Saving Lives One of the most immediate benefits of staffing Station 2 is the reduction in response times for fire and EMS calls in west Shakopee. Previously, units responding from Station 1 in central Shakopee faced longer travel distances and potential delays due to traffic or weather. With Station 2 now fully operational, residents and businesses in the western part of the city will experience faster, more reliable emergency response, often cutting critical minutes off arrival times. In emergency services, every second counts. Whether it's a structure fire, a medical emergency, or a hazardous materials incident, quicker response times can mean the difference between life and death, between minor damage and total loss. The SAFER grant ensures that our department is better positioned to meet these challenges head-on. Improving Coverage and Community Safety Staffing Station 2 also enhances overall coverage across Shakopee. With two fully staffed stations, we can more effectively distribute resources, respond to simultaneous incidents, and provide mutual aid to neighboring communities when needed. Beyond emergency response, the additional staffing will allow us to expand our community outreach, fire prevention education, and training programs. These efforts are essential to building a safer, more informed community and reducing the risk of emergencies before they occur. A Commitment to Progress The SAFER grant is more than just a financial boost; it's a vote of confidence in the Shakopee Fire Department's mission and our commitment to public safety. As we look ahead, we remain focused on continuous improvement, innovation, and service to our community. Staffing Station 2 will be a milestone achievement, and with the support of our residents, city leadership, and federal partners, we will continue to build a safer Shakopee for all. These helmet shields represent the transformative growth of the Shakopee Fire Department following the 2025 FEMA SAFER grant award. 2025 Year in Review I 2' 444 VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT Ladder 1 Engine 1 ENGINES Engine 1 and Engine 2 are sister 2018 Rosenbauer/General Commander pumpers. They have 750 -gallon water tanks and 1,500 gpm pump capacity with foam capability. Engine 3 is a 2006 Rosenbauer/General pumper. It's on a spartan chassis with 750 -gallon water tank and 1,500 gpm pump capacity with foam capability. LADDER Ladder 1 is a 2014 Rosenbauer/General Commander aerial platform truck. It has a 500 -gallon water tank, 2,000 gpm pump capacity, a 101 -foot cobra aerial platform, and is fully equipped with a six -person cab. Tender 2 TENDER Tender 2 is an active member of the fleet, having entered service in April 2025. This apparatus serves as a critical resource for fire suppression in non -hydrant areas, where its main function is to shuttle water to and from the scene. Built on a Kenworth commercial chassis with an all -stainless steel body, Tender 2 carries 2,000 gallons of water and 30 gallons of firefighting foam. The apparatus typically responds with a crew of two personnel. Given its primary role as a water tanker, it carries a specialized and focused equipment set. This inventory includes 400' of 5" supply hose, 400' of 21/2" supply/attack hose, and 400' of 1 3/4" hose. For wildland and brush fire response, the vehicle is equipped with a 150' booster attack line and a dedicated front bumper attack nozzle. A key feature of Tender 2 is its 750 GPM pump -and -roll capability. This system allows responders to operate the front bumper nozzle to extinguish fires while the vehicle remains mobile, providing an efficient and safe method for managing fast-moving brush fires. RESCUE Rescue 1 is a 2023 Chevrolet Silverado. This is a new concept for the Shakopee Fire Department —utilizing a pickup truck and two Firefighter/EMT's to respond to accidents and emergency medical incidents. Rescue 1 22 I Shakopee Fire Department 445 """ VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT BRUSH TRUCK Brush 1 is a 2011 Ford 1 -ton, 4 -wheel drive pickup customized by Foreman Fire with a water tank, pump, and hose reel unit.This vehicle is used for grass and brush fires and for rescue situations in which an off -road vehicle is required. Brush Truck 1 UTV Kubota is a 2020 Kubota Sidekick 850 UTV. It's equipped with tracks and a 70 -gallon water tank and pump for use on brush/ grass fires in areas not accessible by traditional fire apparatus. The unit is also able to transport patients from remote areas. Kubota BOATS Air Boat 1 is a 2015 Midwest Rescue Air Boat used for open water and ice rescue. It can be used as a diving platform for open water diving, search and rescue, and as a large ventilation fan. Air Boat 1 Zodiac is a 2020 MK2 Grand Raid Zodiac boat. It's an inflatable boat with motor and trailer used for open water rescue and can be used for ice rescue with the motor removed. Zodiac 2025 Year in Review 12? 446 GROWING WITH SHAKOPEE A STRATEGIC LOOK AT FIRE AND EMS SERVICES As Shakopee continues to grow, so too must the services that protect and support our community. The Shakopee Fire Department is entering a new era, one defined by strategic planning, expanded coverage, and a commitment to meeting the evolving needs of our residents. With the upcoming staffing of Fire Station 2 through the SAFER grant, we're taking a major step forward. Now, we turn our attention to the future. Strategic Growth to Match a Growing City Shakopee's population and development have surged in recent years, particularly in the eastern and southwestern parts of the city.This growth brings new challenges for emergency services, including increased call volumes, longer travel distances, and the need for more localized response capabilities. To meet these demands, the Fire Department is actively engaged in long-term strategic planning that includes: ■ Evaluating the need for additional fire stations in underserved or high -growth areas. ■ Assessing staffing models to ensure adequate coverage and reduce response times citywide. ■ Exploring innovative deployment strategies, including mobile response units and specialized teams. ■ Investing in training, technology, and equipment to support a modern, adaptable fire service. Staffing for Resilience As we grow, staffing remains a central priority. The SAFER grant will confirm the impact that full-time staffing can have on response times and service reliability. Future planning will continue to prioritize hiring, retention, and professional development to ensure our team is prepared for the challenges ahead. Community -Centered Planning At the heart of our strategic vision is the community we serve. Every decision, from station placement to staffing levels, is guided by our mission to protect lives and property. We are committed to transparency, collaboration, and proactive engagement with residents, businesses, and city leadership. Conclusion: A Department Ready for Tomorrow The Shakopee Fire Department is proud of its progress and excited for what lies ahead. With thoughtful planning, continued investment, and a clear vision for the future, we are building a fire service that will serve Shakopee with excellence for generations to come. Shakopee Fire officially welcomes Tender 2 to Station 2 with a traditional "push -in" ceremony. 24 I Shakopee Fire Department 447 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 8.b May 19, 2026 Donation for Sauna and Scholarship Fund in Honor of Xavier Gillen Kelsi McNutt, Parks and Recreation Director Action to be considered: Accept donation of $12,500 from the Gillen Family Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: The City of Shakopee has received a generous donation of $12,500 from the Gillen family in honor of Xavier Gillen. The Shakopee Community Center was a meaningful place for Xavier, where he spent a significant amount of time and built connections with the staff and community. In recognition of Xavier's connection to the facility, The Gillen Family wishes a portion of the donation be used to support the remodel of the Dry Sauna, an amenity he particularly enjoyed. The Gillen family has also expressed a desire for part of the donation be used as seed money to establish a scholarship program that will assist individuals and families in accessing Shakopee Community Center memberships. Recommendation: Accept a donation in the amount of $12,500 from the Gillen family, given in honor of Xavier Gillen, to support operations and improvements at the Shakopee Community Center. Budget Impact: The $12,500 donation will offset a portion of the capital costs associated with the Dry Sauna remodel project at the Shakopee Community Center. The remaining funds will be allocated to establish a scholarship fund for Community Center memberships. There is no negative impact to the City's general fund. The donation enhances existing project 448 funding and supports the development of a new resource for community members to access the facility. Attachments: Resolution 2026-075 - Sauna Donation.docx 449 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-075 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA ACCEPTING A MONETARY DONATION FROM THE GILLEN FAMILY. WHEREAS, on November 6, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5794, which established procedure relating to the receipt of gifts and donations by the City; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 5794 specifies that donations of real property shall be accepted by resolution of the City Council, and shall require a two-thirds majority of the Council for acceptance; and WHEREAS, the Gillen Family has generously given a monetary donation in the amount of $12,500 to support the Parks and Recreation Department; and WHEREAS, such donation will help support the Dry Sauna remodel project at the Shakopee Community Center and support the establishment of a scholarship fund to support expanded access to the Shakopee Community Center; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the donations are gratefully accepted; and FURTHER, the donation shall be used to support the Shakopee Community Center, consistent with the intent of the donor; and FURTHER, the City staff is directed to send a letter to the donor, acknowledging receipt of the gift and expressing appreciation of the City Council. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this 5th Day of May 2026. Matt Lehman Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk 450 PI°ILA' SHAKOPE E Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 9.a May 19, 2026 Long-term financial plan Nate Reinhardt, Finance Director Action to be considered: No action requested. Motion Type: Informational only Background: As the City Council, you play a key role in financial planning such as setting a service vision, adopting financial policies and keeping long-term financial sustainability at the forefront of decisions. Unlike the annual audit report and annual budget book, there is no set guidelines or template to follow when preparing a long-term financial plan. There is value in going through the exercise and discussing the city finances from a wider perspective. The long- term financial plan presentation covers trend analysis and General fund projections. This will serve as a preliminary step in the annual budget and capital improvement planning processes before determining the annual needs of the city. The long-term financial plan will be incorporated in the City's published Capital Improvement Plan. Recommendation: Discussion and feedback on long-term financial plan. Budget Impact: N/A Attachments: City of Shakopee Long Term Financial Plan - 5-19-2026.pdf LTFP Presentation (5-19-2026).pdf 451 City of Shakopee Long-term Financial Plan May 19, 2026 The Long Term Financial Plan (LTFP) is intended to serve as a tool, providing Council and the public with the insight required to address issues that impact the City's financial condition. The LTFP will be presented to the City Council on May 19, 2026. The LTFP discusses and views city finances from a wider perspective and serves as a preliminary step in the annual budget and capital improvement planning processes before determining the annual needs of the city. Establish Goals & Priorities Monitor Budget Develop Long Term Financial Plan t Develop Balanced Budget Shakopee Sustainable Cycle of City Government The model illustrated on the next page sets high -quality City Services as the foundation of a healthy and growing community as shows where external forces and government action might intervene. The high quality services drive population growth, as more people and businesses want to be a part of our community. Population growth drives growth in real estate values, whether that be new development or rising demand for existing inventory. That growth in real estate values ensures rising tax revenue, which pays for the inflation -based cost increases of high -quality city services with minimal impact on the property tax rate. This cycle is the foundation of annual budget development and helps identify and explain influencing factors. 452 oe P44,. '7) ■ * ■ o High -Quality City Services: Strong Infrastructure, i Safe Neighborhoods, c„ Amenities, etc. oh PVC An increase or decrease in any one of these areas has a direct effect on the others. Property Values Corn mercta\ Trend Analysis Population • • • frip The City's financial trends are analyzed annually with many factors utilized in order to understand the financial condition of the City of Shakopee. These factors include: a. Property Types b. Market Value, Tax Capacity, Adjustments c. Levy Components, Taxes, Tax Rates d. Population e. Staffing This report examines these trends in determining the current and anticipated financial condition of the City of Shakopee. The years presented in the charts are the payable (collection years). General Fund Projections General Fund Projections provide an assessment of the impact on anticipated inflationary changes to the city's operations and estimated impact on property taxes and rates. 453 Property Types (parcels) 900 Property Types 800 700 600 500 400 •• 300 • S i • • 4 b.41 200 100 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Agricultural 86 153 108 201 69 71 53 47 108 198 Apartment 90 92 93 103 105 109 112 112 113 118 ♦Commercial 362 360 366 359 352 353 347 348 352 349 t Exempt 733 740 777 788 792 803 809 826 837 854 ♦Industrial 239 245 231 231 237 258 259 262 263 262 Residential Parcels 17,000 16,000 15,000 14,000 13,000 12,000 11,000 1 VV 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 —5—Residential 12,319 12,364 12,605 12,659 12,786 12,837 13,360 13,683 13,880 14,127 tTotal City-wide 13,910 14,043 14,270 14,436 14,436 14,509 15,016 15,356 15,690 15,980 454 Taxable Market Value 2,000,000,000 1,800,000,000 1,600,000,000 1,400,000,000 1,200,000,000 1,000,000,000 800,000,000 600,000,000 400,000,000 200,000,000 Taxable Market Value 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Apartment 183,742,700 209,752,900 218,740,900 309,078,900 379,661,300 493,022,700 596,660,000 713,349,600 775,299,400 846,047,588 t Commercial 465,821,400 498,376,400 530,616,100 578,601,600 590,529,400 593,451,500 610,225,800 702,496,200 745,589,700 762,240,300 Other 119,726,100 120,727,800 117,887,000 118,347,000 121,340,400 115,490,879 95,009,150 98,919,503 81,984,810 97,461,013 t Industrial 639,816,400 718,438,300 780,039,000 862,446,900 1,033,049,600 1,159,939,400 1,251,764,400 1,571,476,000 1,765,009,000 1,787,901,500 Residential Taxable Market Value 10,000,000,000 9,000,000,000 8,000,000,000 7,000,000,000 6,000,000,000 5,000,000,000 4,000,000,000 3,000,000,000 2,000,000,000 1,000,000,000 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Residential 2,596,290,100 2,768,217,200 2,943,266,000 3,195,276,600 3,415,873,700 3,682,892,656 4,662,097,455 4,692,583,394 4,917,336,577 5,149,301,04 Total City-wide 4,005,396,700 4,315,512,600 4,590,549,000 5,063,751,000 5,540,454,400 6,044,797,135 7,215,756,805 7,778,824,697 8,285,219,487 8,642,951,4 455 Net Tax Capacity 25,000,000 Net Ajusted Tax Capacity 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Apartment 2,034,508 2,318,834 2,431,960 3,485,379 4,088,096 4,863,443 5,777,954 6,253,792 6,301,311 6,955,553 (Commercial 6,173,075 6,299,840 6,641,707 7,212,271 7,326,190 6,925,847 6,885,924 8,686,231 8,368,906 7,793,480 iI,Other 1,311,152 1,308,475 1,285,082 1,297,871 1,351,467 1,141,026 951,122 1,058,190 867,823 976,224 Industrial 7,940,561 8,063,856 8,437,319 9,342,762 11,535,937 13,159,674 14,213,455 21,224,747 22,661,231 21,703,280 100,000,000 90,000,000 80,000,000 70,000,000 60,000,000 50,000,000 40,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 10,000,000 Residential Adjusted Net Tax Capacity 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 #Residential 26,036,865 27,760,389 29,541,409 32,104,091 34,332,115 37,017,226 47,156,825 47,420,386 49,766,250 52,099,107 Total City-wide 43,496,161 45,751,394 48,337,477 53,442,374 58,633,805 63,107,216 74,985,280 84,643,346 87,965,521 89,527,644 456 Tax Capacity Adjustments $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 Fiscal Disparities Net Contribution (Tax Capacity) 10.2% of Gross Tax Capacity ($11,706,305) 4.2% of Gross Tax Capacity ($2,219,811) 8.6% of Gross Tax Capacity... $2,000,000 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Fiscal Disparities Adj. 2,219,811 3,647,951 3,923,222 4,269,141 5,102,644 6,139,141 6,235,453 6,665,042 9,447,423 11,706,30 $5,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $- TIF Districts Captured Net Tax Capacity 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 TIF 10 - River City Centre (2023) ■ TIF 16 - Rahr (2021) ■ TIF 19 - Riverfront (2047) TIF 14 - Sanmar (2023) ■ TIF 17 - Amazon (2023) ■ TIF 20 - Enclave (2046) ■ TIF 15 - All Saints (2039) ■ TIF 18 - Canterbury (2045) ■ TIF 21 - Southridge Soils (2041) 457 Levy Components, Taxes & Tax Rates 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 Levy Components (In Millions) $24.39 $25.97 $27.24 $28.76 $20.73 $21.37 $18.93 $19.61 $19.58 ■ $22.97 • 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 General Debt Service • EDA Levy CIF/Park 45.0% 40.0% $ Change in City/EDA Levy, % Change, City Tax Rate 38.5% 37.2% 35.0% $1,316,146 34.9% 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% -5.0% $684,207 .5% 2017 2018 6%$30,048 $1,150,000 32 0.2% 4.0% $1,618,200 2019 2020 2021 �$ Change $1,800,000 $1,581,000 $1,520,430 $1,600,000 I$1,271,050 ' $1,400,000 28.6%_ $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 6.1% - 6.5% o 4.9/ 1 5.6% $200,000 $1,406,000 2022 2023 % Change 2024 2025 $- 2026 Tax Rate $(200,000) 458 Population, City Employees 49,000 47,000 45,000 43,000 41,000 39,000 37,000 35,000 Population 46,817 45,593 45,961 46,037 42,595 43,69 41,143 41,519 39,523 40,254 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 - Full-time Employees S - _•%--_ ter+ 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 tGeneral Government 30 29 28 29 29 29 30 30 30 31 .O.Public Safety 76 76 78 77 78 78 82 88 89 90 Public Works 27 27 28 28 30 30 29 29 28 28 Park and Recreation 24 23 25 27 29 29 30 31 31 32 459 General Fund Projections Baseline Data • Revenue and expenditures projections are based on current year budgeted amounts (2026). Revenues (inflationary assumptions) • Property taxes — 4.00% annnual increase needed to support expenditure assumptions. • Licenses and permits — 3.00% • Intergovernmental - 3.00% • Charges for services — 3.00% • Miscellaneous - 2.00% Expenditures • General Government — 3.00% • Public Safety — 3.50% (additional .50% based on personnel) • Public Works — 3.00% • Parks & Recreation — 3.00% • Other — 0.00% Additional Information • City's fund balance policy is to maintain a General Fund unassigned fund balance of 35 to 50% of the following year's budgeted expenditures. • Taxable market value, net tax capaicty and median value home data is from Scott County for taxes payable 2026 and projected out to future years. The taxable market value and net tax capacity is projected to increase 4% annually, which the median value home is projected to increase 3% annually. • Number of households and population data is based on the 2020 Census and Met Council estimates. Equal annual adjustments have been made based on the average increase from the 2020 census number to the 2023 Met Council estimated for future years. 460 2026 General Fund Annual Budget Projection W r rq�Cl 101 yY W rl i O p r1 O V Etl 0. N W el eel a 0 00 0 1 p f1 .Q d W fl O Ef1 a 'O O O CA S 0 0 0' gggggggggg '40 M M M O N O O O .•00.1 O V ry S r- 00 Na 0 o 0 N 'NO 'O0 0% 'n 00 M N 'ClN 00 M 'Cj0o00-gN a N N Val -la^ a N N OO a T , 'Cl T Oog' $$ b M1O rio $ N .M1-1 M vl en S a .Cl N 00 M n GpbO✓l8M S. b wt V n. N 00 .N00p0 on .r1 *0 *0M.-. '4 OS O Cl N Cl 'n b 00 a Os O fV f j 00 C aa O.M1-' O•'N O AM1 00 M M1 wl '0 N M " O M M a O l b h a Cl o0 .--,--a0 ..3 i p p aaa a v, 'O M1 N Cl O N N O rj -en y N NO 'Cl N N N 0%03 eM'0 a vv, oq§ oQO M1 '-' M 00 p M1 N N M1 01 8 ' Ch 00 'Cl 'Cl M el ^cAml e4l— 03 Cl N O a M a fY O' N N 050% '0 vi O n ''n0 O'n'- a M b b as Cl v.M O 'D '0 'Cl 8.a^. .M-. O �N M1 ''y00- el. �Y. '.n0 .— N 00 V N M vw N M1 M on '0 vi T vi 'D CA O Q Q O O N 'Cl 00 8 C N N Cl N 00 .M1-. Cl N M vllel vi vs M'O ✓ pm ?103''0 a4- .1 Cl E. T O 00 00 Cl T r- Cl a ' on Os O O . a b 'WI O 0%oN pm rl V1 0et m% '0 ri v1 Ch M1 410.0 N Ch f- T M11. vlbvi T at a b 'O .•1 . a V L 0 4, w $b$$ O O M M M M p—a..,.0pal O' M 00 0%l0 fn MN 00 r�00aC 030 b .N•. M 00 .a1 ON' n M h b h Cl 00 N b Cl .•. 0000' M N M1 00 N '0 ',O N N O N MM N a N 0003 10 .N-. N aP.00T 00 vl O 'Cl M O N M oo N 00 M1 W .-. 4a' 'v�0 '0 WI M Cl O M 00 M .n Cl M 'O'O a O 'n 0000 Q f � Cl N "..M-' 'v0 V. A vl 'O T N p b 40._„ M1ry if. M1 Cl vl^'-1 T H 0% T O O M1 M1 N fl MN''a o b .N. ,'0 mm T N r &' 'c ag r '0..-.''003 b M1 or -N N a aaV�r 'O 'O N vie T Cl Cl 03 00 O„ 88 1^ .p R O N OO a T a fn 00 r� K r- ti N ON' -N T b N vl Ol Om000'Cl on N ON 0 r4 c4 CA on 0, N r; T0, 3N O M1 rJ Cl MM Vl .T-.- 'O N T Cl on T Cl C4 et NN 00 f0n Cl'V 0 Cl M1 ' l .--..a,a M pp 'Cl a N '0 'f.1'1 'D 00 '? T h !, Vl OO a O- r O O O a M1 O M1 0) f1 M1 L 0 00 N -r V. O h v 0 tr O b O 11 O 00 f1 K O f. q b -r N O r T 00 en Vi K O fet R T O N T N N CA M EXPENDITURES T CO .-i 'f. DO O. Y el aCh on ! ^ f .r el •n 0 on N 'f. r! 0 Cl .O-. K f1 DO fo '0 V) 03 fl rl v: 2 O f1 Cien V! 0f! M M4 TCO C.; fl - .3 T T ' 1 T M q tH b r 4,c; f1 Cl M1 f1 0M1 i r Cl it n'.'0 pm 1 a r-. T '0 N '0 a r, M1ri b T 40 ri r4 l0 M1 00 fI OD fl e r b !fl M Cl01 'C 0000 Cl 'Cl on en en h yM e M1 n. et M b 4%CAa% 00" Nrn r- 2 'Cl Cl T cA n rn T a .M-' N N !. O O' 40N p r on 0> et'n 0O0Oa0a p •'r 00 h ' M M 8 M1 O a 0 . •. M1 �• Cl,47 v el M1 vl N n O a'1 h M1 M1!' N N N .••. N r b O n r aiai ? �M1 b b b M O' -b, - '0 h 4. vNl NmM14.M17„- m40 .If N vl �NNV `f01 N Cl M ae C N N N N Cl 'Cl en e e 'n Cl 0 M Qy� N T a .b'1 'Cl a 'D N M'C M1 h M 0% ey n' •.b.. OM1 M1 .N•. 00 N Cl 'Cl b Cl Cl Cl en .M1-. } N N N N y �N�pp V� e s .-e- 01 N !r 0 Ct 'O NN fry M M, O M1- N '4.*4 N Cl p oQi... �.-. 0.- N0. '0 8 RNry a.. Cl N''O N fl b Cl tf'nl .M' N N N - N 'Cl N e e a 1"'000 bT rt M1 '00 ' n bN fJ �Oa o0 r M1M1 b M 03 A 03c. _ ry'p 'r O b M OWN N Cl''n0 N -5 '0 Cl 4 ' 00 N el Cl M O N N N N pi7 ''0p \ \ v .-' `e If S . b f'1 ' - 00 o V '0 N O' O' w .r vw MM OO o b In 'OO O '7 0 103, M1 Cl T 2.= NT� M1NZ c1 Cl Vl `N- frO a fl Cl O on N N N N 'Qp e a e o 1 T ? ' b f4 a V N 00 O' r. ao r N a-. Mai en 00%0 " NvOl'r0 f! T M1,. M1 Cl pl n 0 Cl Cl v M O/ 8 N N N N o o N 1, pp !� en 'n wt M N ' 0$ 0 00 h M * 00 a en .•-^03-1 M O T h M1 N M a OOMO O! b M1 ,,w 00 N M I ea M f N N a a N .. 1 b b 'as M M v A O a M1 .••. . -"!''Cl r O. a ,, .�•' i f 1 Cl Cl 0G a a N a p N a O a a s ee m• vl O N n N T M1 00 00 �, ..YT's - a fn S O M M a Os N .T-' srlm'p •-• 4.„ A 'D v Cl y vl Cl 03 ..44 o tl Cl Cl fJ CO M G N an (6 pp' N i.'r K '0 � $ DO O M o g Q' - $' uJ ! M11 en oo f T V1 00 b '. fV '0 N .n b T 'Cll 00 f. N . M Cl C- 0T0 V Ali O N N N N61 1 u C1 00 P I hi NH .2 O a • I •z. C Ci- (13 C C Long-term City Council Work Session N O N 6 CD 2 4J W n CU >> 4' ro (13 I I 3 I I Ji N m G A E PIN o c c 'a O. 1 5 R ii v a... 4C E a E O V -_E 8 LTFP Background N a) 4-0 a) 75 0 0 4-1 4-0 nC W V c O 4-0 a)75 v) e- `) O (a V I C M (o W -a i i N a--+ q- • 75 CI) C ca O 'V V ( E O +� N Vas 03 E rW a) i 75 C O t,, nC W . O -W5a L- i") W CU 0_ c 11 O 0 V I Z C .V cn O O 2, v 03 • O C 03 cn V X (13 C O c 0 . Q • Establish Goals & Monitor Budget Develop Balanced Budget a--+ a) E a) V a--0 V 0 a) V V co C fT^ L 1 a) a) Q 0 to { m N mt u ,-'l m Di N .� 1 on N m r.1 m Di N N rNO N ‘11. ,—I m Di N N Yq. D u1 m !i N N m m m Di N r� m Di N cr, in N N N kn.r-I m N N r1 m m Di r-1 N r -17 N N al vi n m rn O N b m m f N E m I' N Lb N m rr, C. on o- 4b m m N m N .A,gricuituraN C ,43 QJ 76 O- o 1 U w R ident al ParceCk N- tr cv 0 ktt c -d 0 cal n� cJ 0 a-7 0 r-� 0 0 0 0 'Y7 Lfl r-1 rf r ▪ -I r -f rl r -I r rJ ab on oP N. r3J Li'1 r -I O-5 rrg c�J 0 op u-i 0 Li'5 u▪ , m 0 N. rr9 0 ✓ ▪ i 0 rJl Net Ajusted Tax Capacitor In In l 0 6r7 Lrn N 0 N N N ri N 0 EN CO 7-I 0 N C in U n err CTI r-- —I 4D h7 E71 CO fn 4D C+5 N Q5 fi Lrl { n Ui r r-- Ln Col W 0 Crti Lrl Cu el rl t+7 N h3 C N 4J G t 1I7 rx� N 417 CQ LD 64 N Ln Co 4D CJ Cr) I 4D cn rl EN N r -I N f N r� r -I 4D LD LYS CO 4D CC rl 4CI Ln 0 *+I N N ri Lil 4D !ri e�I sJ' in f3.3 yl rI N r a -I N rN Ln" IX] N 4- I. Lin rry r• I 22.6 1,231 N r -- EN rl N 1t.21:3,455 11,535,937 4b N CO a, C75 OCI- ID Lfn cri 1D C) CfS I Lrl 4D C -I Ln to- i ri C7 ri CO al Lb r -I N �Conimerc a Residential Adjusted Net Tax Capacity 1DD, ,D130 8 C] C) CJ 8 6 8 0 O 8 O CI o Sb ci cJ 8 0 N CD cal { C3 CJ Lfl rl 4L7 Li} Qf. LTl SN up - CJ LT' fsJ rl f t7°` 26,036,865 4s'�ie 89,527,644 74,95,=8,0 0 8 0 8 g 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 2 O 0 0 C?. 0 8 C On INJ rt C? Fiscal Disparities Adj. TIF Districts Captured Net Tax Capacity OM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 R 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 Lf1 CI. Laq uqul Lo # m m' C.4 A VI & 0 p 0 q Tr' 0 rJ m EN O nJ q 0 q ■ TIF 15 - All Saints X2039) m ■ TIF 15 - Canterbury12045) ■ TIF 21- 5outhrid:ge Soils (2041} q ® Tr LN • EN 0 0 _ LN 0 / O 2 / / 3 / 0 & LI- Lk. 0 r r r EN ■ ■ ■ n 0 LN 0 LN N 0 q • TIF 10 - River City Centre X2023} Riverfront 2047} O a � C U) C a) C O 0 E O U a) OWL111=111=1111111111111M, $19.61 $19.58 m cc 8 0 un- r^I 8 8 D N rsl rsl rsl C�J Q C�J ✓ Oil co CO C'J U cu • W Debt Service n ity/EDA Leery, 56 Change, CityTax Rate 413 (—) S C C C C7 0. - co LLB C fan - m C NJ ri 8 C co C Ln N NJ O-1 35.0°.6 $1,316,146 Lr5 C C m N N CD .d� CO co it LCD 0 0 0 C L � C LPi LID ev C NJ NJ C� NJ mot° NJ C NJ m N e eel NJ ry C 4.1 C nl C NJ C r -•J C N CO r NJ N C N —Tax Rate U I O CL 0 0 00 fvi czt eel 71- er) l O-4 Cri rJ CD rNi rNi JJ i� CJ C) C) C) C) 4th 4 4 4 •, .4 4 4 �4 CriN. I 4 ! ' 4 Cr! Lr-i N_ o = N 0 m e N m Full-time Employees \ on % N N / O N 2 i /N on N N N N N N \ N N N b on N N N N N N N / N N N N N N 4-1 N N N N % b N # N C C CU o E 2 y Un E _Q _Q _ L G I 3 a a a N O N • N tuj co co Co Co 03 • o O� clo bA Cy eti XI IN N N Agricultural $54,847,313 $36,786,775 -32.9% Apartment 846,047,588 873,902,500 3.3% Commercial 762,240,300 782,235,400 2.6% Industrial 1,787,901,500 1,804,322,500 0.9% Public Utility/Railroad 38,764,100 38,706,500 -0.1% Residential 5,149,301,046 5,483,673,286 6.5% O?. M in O O N n O Totals $8,642,951,447 $9,023,679,161 4.4% ..r .4• A A. a o N pN CV A OHO M MI e ..... - New construction accounts for about 43.3% of the increase - Median value home $375,300 (increase of $14,000 or 3.9%) 0 a) U 'CU LL CU (n 4 a) Z7 a w O U a) V) a) Debt Per Capita v N O N Cn O N ZNI N NO N O gog O N � Lri O co Oi 6.49% 5.52% 6.30% 7.32`c • �p o `e T T * a OHO )ogo. O O O O in O LA O J N I- I- imim Class 2 Cities Cities in Scott County —.—City of Shakopee 0 0 0 p C 0 0 0 0 0 N N �O O O� N Ci V) N V) V) V) Class 2 Cities O U a-� 0 co a) City of Shakopee Taxes Per Capita N G) 4, CU CC cU N � O vD N tf) N U N NVD ro vi X ea .c_ bboy N g CV O O O O O N V) t!) Q) vi X O i N 00 Q. NQ Q) Q) LON a (1) C C 6 L. O a) U * , Q) U O Y C z V) cco C U) cl)O co a v U Zo z O 0OD 'O dO' N O CO CD O0 1OO d0 N N N tO/) N tO/) fO N N to to Class 2 Cities 1 O N N- N N1/4O O ap N N N oho oho �o N a 4 N M N O' ON CV 1/40 N M v' 0 0 o o �o S. O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 4 O N O O v CJO U CO Class 2 Cities —.—City of Shakopee 0 O O 0 O C 03 Property Taxes in MSP Metro Area for a $300,000 Home • • • • • • • • • I • • • • • • • 6 4 • • • o o 0 c 0 v 0 1 11 sexelA;!J 8 8 C N CU N C O a •+r S cv x o cv Q �+ Q O O N a C N 0 0 N • NI c 3 O ss •- O N 0_ O N `i ;6 V _0 r1 : 5 c t E arat c • • tow Cct ww� O 0.1 0.5 r", r I rl C,, +a Tit I IFS31. , c. 0 c. , Ir, c. In , r -I O r-- I , r 1 r -I r -I +-- +II I 14, 74, 0 .#4 o 64. 02,14. �rI 7 Id Property Taxes • P1 W V CC C 0 -a -I--, V W Q E 0 0 0 N c c LL N (23LCU 0 .> ^C C) ci V CL • ra C C C) 0 0 E 0 V to N C co V a) 4J Q f' fQ 03 ateJ V co (13 O N v N • co C O a. V o o 0 o 00 ("NIrNI O 00 N 00 V 03 Q 03 ro X Tax Levy(City/Debt Service/CIP/EDA) Tax Levy (General Fund only) Charges for Services N N 0 X w o o 00 c l0 M 00 o o General Government Public Works Park & Recreation Q) 1(.6 O ID ra co a qD O N 75 C ra a --r ) cn -0 C N .O 0 +-+ N V c a) 0 •O -2 8: v) c O ro C (3 E � �v, L c W a) 'cu v, Q1 0- C 03 00 X a) oo > w 0 0 O O O M I O co cu cc 06 v.) ro vi L_ O U n p_ a) E i a) O 0 CD CU a) . O O M I N a) C C O Q q- co t/1 GL • • Revenues O O rri cm a) U .> a) 1_ �O 2) s u ate-+ C E c l- o i cu 4-0 vi E Q ro N a) U J . 0 0 N I DI •i [6 N 4-0 VI a, 2 a) N O a) ro a) N 2 . I O 4J a E tm a) D C a X a) +J L a a O 4J a) 73 a) CU C a) v C co C fD O O X . Ie el fl rI Q W Y Q rr i6 1.„ 0 O 1~ jpY k io d e a d N ; a b 0 H a - n y prl o 00; a` 0 0 „ al7 rr 1 O MTenue3: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 OMfn000.1000 .N-. 00 C4 Ch pO N 00 .n..Op V co r4 41 VD M O. Vl 00 on n 000'en0000N. r- .0 O. M vtn r"r cit. nmn M vi'm n O 0.•0%00 g.'0 NON^' N'0 -'b .. h. N M h MI O O. .. N M M r M Vl n 00 M n p'0 O t'..1 O 00.1 O '0r •Q Nn 00 ^0- p 000p0 M .1 00 00L V OH O m n N ,rl.003 on 6aOl gO. O . ,$. r4 re a VD CD Os 0 N. N 00 .0 ' O ' 0..44 n a r4 C2 ler o- Nr- 0o m r - V%'0 N M Vt Q M •0 O a '00mm V% 0-- N000 0% r--. gl co O Vl h m .D N h'O n O 00%'0` 00%0 N. n r On N 0 el n n N n M .0 N n .--. Mgp 00 n VI N 0- T ry. N * N O n Ch 00 el N M .MOr' Ch on .. M -. M VD N. N' a b le n§MK.O.W W0 .t4 ..01.4h."Os. n M 0. % Vi 0 W'OOV'w.o%m''00 .0 •rl 'D N 442 VD b ' .'n•.-. O f N.. 7 cis Nei r on onel Vl 00 ee re en •0 '0% N.re CO N. M .0 M 4^M.,6 N O RR O O O O ONO O 0 N CO 8 N. N n 00 h Vi N N QO O et co V.0 ' el O err N Vl O. b N Vl n O 0 N 00, 01w0,4^ 4 N 0%'0 Vl N CaOI pO CaO, O O a O oQ§ O 45 Y §§00 VM M M M 01 03 00 o 01 O' Mn 00 ,D M 01 O M M n -f .t.(0.. 10 00 N 00 0% N O 000 '0 N 10 M cep '0 n 00 0% .. V ift nKK a f1 00 v M r UN O v 0O Ol ON, n M .n '0 .0 N 00 0%'C N N .. 0000 N Q M N n 00 ^'4`ON '+ le O n 01 r4 Ch r4 on on N V.1. N 00 00 .D N N AR 00 Vl O Vl M O N M 00 N a,- N O VI 00 00 Q N. N N . CO M. 4..M,04.0`: N . 0- 0, I' VI" Vl .. N .--. .+� .O a 0 •now .0 t 1 N'0 M 00 n -1 O n . M V V1 n N OS n a M O K N O H et v "4- Cr n n n M C4 O Ch O.0..01.W.. y NM,DN Nn rN N... M1M11' '0% co Kt QbMr 4,:t.4)..0%. .n-. .D 0 OIa'0NN '0 'O N Vl 0 K N .... N rl00fi r o No O. 45 V on 00 n Kn .n. CO ON' on O4 C3 CD CD h M N 0 N "ti.Ma.O 8 NNCC OOn MV .D N K1 01 a Vt N a 44 et re r4 N N. 0Ch 000 01 .--, N 4.0 N n In OO n M pp VI O, CC '0 N b Vl 00 'O 00 N CD O .L T r 0 h 00 fs Ol 000% 'r. 1K M 0 0 O 0 O Cl 0 0 00 .r 45 V 0Y) 0) K O '. 0 •f. to CD vi ,i. F- 0% 4 O 0.4 O V rJ Vl N M glticm MM K 44 0 r. t4 ON.01 K K .r r et a ..1 r 0 .O ti ,D f1 fl b b ..1 O N I!. f1 ..� 0 M f U. IS' 01 .O. K el '0 .0 r oi on .A r a, r .t O K 10 fi el 01 r el e r- 4 l rl f1 T ^•1 .. !� Y O m Oh rl b0% h ti et f1 ' rl i a ON fl K O r. r4 SC! ,-i PI 0% n R '0 N r4 r0. n K Ch VD ei 41 N O VG O. fl K r" el r O .M. '0 fl fl vo 00) on Of fl PM Ut n 0 f fl N el Ut N f1 f1 M -r K K 01 Clee 00 00 '0 f1 0. n a .O N N N Vl on M.0 M e n n O. 0 O N Y 00 N Vl M 0-0:7 N. N rr). Oi n '^ a v M re a 'O CD C) VNl 0% 00 .-. N h n et ri.M. N N 8 I b N 8 . n 0 tNNrl p pon r, vl ,D M M O x n f4 h.N4 .NN-. ,a N N N. r4 h N. 0% N 0�n n * CO CO N N co on 01 n n bN .0 pp no '0 M 0..00 MM 0- ,0 01 0 `v' .t a O' 41^' N h 0 w co en C4 et 00 N 00 OD N N M CO N N CO Vl M e e e.•� N e on a N 4 0. Vl l0. 'ON M . n on on 0l on on .O Cl. M M M N,1 M N N 00 q gra 00 N l0. 'f — Ml M W n .N-. �"� 00 N YQ N •n .D t, - C. N n N `C on CO CO CO CO !h 00% `00 eir v N M on n '0 00 n a N v CO CO WI n a M O '0 CO S (2,473,551) S(2,682,792) 00 b N M M re e ry on on O N. 'O N �t ' on on 4.4 et y 4.. C Of CO CO .0. — n N oo .O-. N. N N CO O Ol M 00 .0-. .0,0 ee en N M M oil & MM N e t0 00 bbb a O. S 00 0 '0 Vl N.400,T .--.00 N re el 10 a V ' o N .. on OMot j N N O .N. V .f N 00 n 4 ,0 N 'P .-, M O 0, 0, N. 8 N nN M M to N 00 CC N 0 0 00 0 , •or4 el oo C4 on O Cl '0 01 N CO O. O ems= r on .41 On GOV on CO. 4R 44 4. 'f m O0 o 7:11".1:4„Ar- 01 Ch 44 on t 0) .,a. e - , b b 06 71.3it7-06 N rt Vl N N 00 00 8 ton O O Y M O O. • O en N. en Vl M1 N (` CO CO CO et on. h O. N O re N VMi .0 CO The 2026 Bndeet year is the base vex for future oroiectioni. ,O el 00 O ' y� N •n .O N w OnO O. 00 n OO" N •rl h Vl M Vl M M V1 O. rmZ l N .g 000n O M M 00 W 73. 50% Fold Balance Policy Eaces.1 Fund Balance .O fel n• N C O N a 06 .N v, L.) 0 WILLA! SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 10.a May 19, 2026 City Bill List Becky Smith, Accounting Specialist Action to be considered: Review of City Bill List Motion Type: Informational only Background: The City Bill has been provided to the City Council. Recommendation: Review of City Bill List Budget Impact: N/A Attachments: 485 WILLA! SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 10.b May 19, 2026 News and Announcements Rick Parsons Action to be considered: No action, item is informational only. Motion Type: Informational only Background: Announcements and Upcoming Events: • Grand Opening of the Miracle Field of Shakopee: O Join the City of Shakopee, Shakopee Lions Club, and other community partners from 6-8 pm Wednesday, May 27, for the grand opening of the Miracle Field of Shakopee! Miracle Field is a fully accessible baseball field at Tahpah Park built for players of all abilities. This event is free and open to the public. • Annual Picnic with Police: o Save the date for the annual Picnic with Police from 5-8 pm Monday, June 8, at Huber Park. Join Shakopee police and other community leaders for a free picnic dinner, games, activities, and a night of family -friendly fun! No registration necessary. Recommendation: Please review the information on upcoming news and announcements. Budget Impact: N/A. Attachments: 486