The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About15.D.3. Draft Scott County 2005-2009 Highway Capital Improvement Program (CIP) IS (). 3, CITY OF SHAKOPEE. Memorandum TO: Mayor & City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Draft Scott County 2005-2009 Highway Capital Improvement Program (CIP) DATE: June 1, 2004 INTRODUCTION: Attached is a Draft Scott County Highway Department 2005-2009 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Council review and discussion prior to the City commenting to Scott County by June 4, 2004. BACKGROUND: Scott County Highway Department conducts a 5-year CIP for the improvements of the Scott County Highway System on an annual basis. County staff has been involving City staff in the working and formation of the Draft Scott County Highway CIP, which is attached for Council review and comment. Staff has reviewed the CIP and has attached a draft letter to be sent to Greg Illka of the Scott County Public Works Division on the original draft of Scott County Highway Department'sCIP. Also included in the CIP is a map and listing of transportation studies that need to be conducted in order for proper planning and coordination for future projects to be constructed. Staff would like to present the Scott County 5-year CIP and the list of transportation studies to the City Council that affect the City of Shakopee for their review and comment on priorities for the City. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Provide staff direction and comments on the Draft Scott County 2005-2009 CIP. 2. Do not provide any comments at this time. 3. Table for specific information. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No.1, to provide the County comments on the City of Shakopee's concerns on the Scott County Highway Department's 2005-2009 CIP so these comments can be considered by staff and ultimately presented to the County Board for consideration and possible approval. ACTION REQUESTED: Provide staff direction and comments to be included in the response letter to Scott County. BVpmp ENGRlEMPLOYEEFOLDERlPPENNINGTONCOUNCIVCOUNTY CIP ~ SHAKOPEE May 25, 2004 Gregory Illka Scott County Public Works Division 600 Country Trail East Jordan,1fN 55352 RE: Scott County Highway Department 2005-2009 Highway Capital hnprovement Program (CIP) Dear Greg: This letter in response to your letter dated May 5, 2004 and in regard to the City of Shakopee's comments and recommendations on Scott County Highway Department's 2005-2009 CIP. Staff has reviewed the current County CIP and has the following comments and recommendations for you to consider: . CSAH 21, from CSAH 18 to CSAH 42 - The City of Shako pee has recently gone on record for support in proceeding with CSAH 21 improvements and would ask that the project remain in the 5-year CIP and CSAH 21 EIS be completed as scheduled. . 1 ih Avenue, from C.R. 15 to c.R. 79 - This extension of 17th Avenue is necessary for recently annexed areas from Jackson Township to occur and support the Shakopee School District's referendum of constructing a new high school and secondary school along 17th Avenue between C.R. 77 and C.R. 79. This project has not been included in Scott County's CIP and the City is requesting that it be included. . C.R. 79, from 11th Avenue to I ih Avenue - The City of Shakopee anticipates growth in this area and a future high school and secondary school is anticipated to be built west of c.R. 79 by 2007. The City requests that a study be done to determine the necessary improvements for this road and for road improvements to be included in the 5-year CIP. COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 129 Holmes Street South . Shakopee, Minnesota. 55379-1351. 952-233-3800. FAX 952-233-3801. www.ci.shakopee.mn.us . CSAH 17 and Vierling Drive Intersection Improvements for Improved Traffic Circulation - The City of Shakopee would request that a study be conducted to determine what improvements can and should be done in order to improve traffic circulation in this very high volume and traffic movement area. . CSAH 17 Improvements at 10th Avenue and 4th Avenue - The City has been successful in obtaining Federal grants to improve these intersections and would request a study be done to determine what improvements can be done within the time frame and needed improvements. Preliminary indications are that Scott County will look at possible signal improvements for these intersections, as the current three lane design is performing well and a 5-lane intersection improvement should be coordinated with an overall corridor study and improvement schedule for c.R. 17, from C.R. 101 to Vierling Drive. . CSAH 16, from c.R. 83 to CSAH 18 - The City of Shakopee anticipates further development in this area and with the number of driveways off of existing CSAH 16 in the area from C.R. 83 to McKenna Road, the City believes these improvements to CSAH 16 should be programmed in anticipating future traffic increases and potential safety problems. . c.R. 15 Improvements, from T.H. 169 to future 1 ih Avenue - The City is anticipating commercial growth in this area and necessary improvements may be warranted due to the traffic volume and growth in the area. The City of Shakopee would request a County review and the need for this project and possibly included in the CIP. . 4th A venue and c.R. 83 Signal and Turn Lane Improvements - These improvements would depend on the building of the Shenandoah Business Park and future expansion of the Opus development, as described in the Shenandoah Business Park and Opus AUAR. Staff believes these improvements will be needed by the year 2006-2007. . Traffic Control Signals for Intersection of c.R. 79 and Vierling Drive; and CSAH 18 and CSAH 16 - Staff believes these intersections should be reviewed in the next 5 years for possible traffic control signal warrants and justification for signal installation. . CSAH 83 South of 17th A venue to City Limit Line - The City of Shakopee would request a study and possible project for improving CSAH 83 in the future. . CSAH 17, from St. Francis Avenue to C.R. 78 - The City of Shakopee supports the improvement of CSAH 17 in this area and would request that these improvements coincide with the possible relocation of St. Francis A venue, future signal at CSAH 17 and construction of Valley View Road, from Evergreen Lane to Sarazin Street. These improvements will result due to the expansion of St. Francis Medical Center plans. This concludes my list of comments and recommendations for potential highway improvements for the year 2005-2009. Please review this list and if you have any questions in regard to my suggestions, please feel free to contact me at Shakopee City Hall. Sincerely, Bruce Loney Public Works Director BUpmp ENGR/EMPLOYEEFOLDERlPPENNINGTON/LETTERSIILKKA .- l~~" ttll SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION Ii ~ ~1)~7~- HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. 600 COUNTRY TRAIL EAST. JORDAN, MN 55352-9339 IA~ ~U~'IJ (952) 496-8346 . Fax: (952) 496-8365 . www.co.scott.mn.us LEZLlE A. VERMILLION \D) ~ @ ~ U \Yl ~ ..~ PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR I D r -I l, ,q I BRADLEY J. LARSON I D 11;' I . " May 5,2004 L------- j ,-c ;f !C C ,- ,.:i r', l- t . .. .. . .. . ....,-.,,_.~"....._._._-""' Bruce Loney, Engineer .----.-~..~.._.-.'^" .---.. .. City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street S Shakopee,~ 55379 Subject: Scott County Highway Department 2005~2009 Highway Capital Improvement Program (eIP) Scott County Highway Department's CIP process is designed to provide local government involvement and flexibility in project selection and funding. As noted in the attached schedule, the process begins with the distribution of the existing CIP (enclosed) for your comments and recommendations for the proposed 2005-2009 draft CIP. We would appreciate your comments and recommendations by June 4, 2004. Also enclosed is a list of transportation study needs, and a transportation studies information sheet. We would appreciate your review and comments on these study needs as well. If you have any questions regarding the capital projects please call me at (952) 496-8356. If you have any questions regarding the study needs please call Brian Sorenson at (952) 496-8060. Thank you in advance for your comments and suggestions. Thanks also for making last year's process a success. Sincerely, p" r? #d// /~Iu ~ Gregory M. Ilkka, P.E. Assistant County Highway Engineer ~~~ ~ Enclosures . C: County Commissioners Dave Unmacht, County Administrator mk-w:\word\cip\2005-2009\05-09 cip -initial.doc An Equal Opportunity/Safety Aware Employer SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY CIP PROCESS May County staff circulates latest CIP to local jurisdictions for comments June Receive comments from local jurisdictions June/July County staff: . Summarizes and prioritizes comments . Prepares Draft CIP . Prepares a comment and responses spreadsheet for Board review . Prepares a changes spreadsheet for Board review Mid-August County staff makes presentation to County Board Early September Administration circulates "draft" CIP for review Mid-October Responses due from local jurisdictions regarding "draft" CIP Early November Staff: . Formalize final CIP, based on comments . Prepares a revision to draft spreadsheet Mid-November Staff presents final CIP to County Board Early December County Board adopts CIP Marchi April Process begins again HIGHW AY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Current. Transportation Plan Goals (May.. 2001) Scott County is committed to providing a safe and efficient transportation system for current and future residents and businesses in a cost-effective manner. The Transportation Plan includes the following goals to carry out this commitment: 1. To PRESERVE the existing transportation infrastructure, in order to protect the significant investment already made, and reduce unnecessary premature costs of replacing of existing facilities. 2. To MANAGE the existing trcmsportationsystem to maximize safety and efficiency. 3. To IMPROVE and EXPAND the existing transportation system as necessary to. meet current and future transportation needs. 4. To explore ALTERNATIVE MODES OF TRANSPORTATION based on the needs of those who live, work, and travel in Scott County. 5. To provide TRANSPORTATION PLANNING that results in a local transportation system that will safely serve the needs of current and future residents and businesses, support the County's development plans, and compliment the regional transportation system. Pro9rammin9 Strate9ies Projects included in the Highway Capital Improvement Program (CIP) implement needs identified in the Scott County Transportation Plan. The plan also includes policies to guide the development of the Scott County Transportation System. The 2004-2008 Highway CIP is organized by preservation, management, and expansion projects. The following program development criteria are used and are consistent with the Transportation Plan policies. Pro9ram Development Criteria . Local agency requests . Structural deficiencies . Safety issues . Geometric deficiencies . Capacity issues . Traffic volumes . System connections / continuity . Balance staff workload / ability to deliver . Funding partners Individual projects are then prioritized using the following criteria: . Maximize safety - correct existing deficiencies in geometry and capacity . Reduce operating/maintenance cost - correct existing deficiencies in structure. . Minimize social and environmental impacts in the most cost~effective manner. . Maximize effective project size. . Utilize all possible funding sources. The following process is used for gathering public input for developing the Annual Highway CIP. . May Circulate latest CIP to local agencies for comments . .June Receive comments from local agencies . Oct. VVorkshop with County Board . Oct. Circulate draft CIP to local agencies for comments . Nov. Summarize comments and prepare finalCIP . Dec. CIP presentation and County Board Adoption Scott County Hi9hway Department The Scott County Highway Department is responsibJefor the planning, design, construction and maintenance of roads, bridges and traffic control devices on the County Highway system. The department works with cities, townships, adjacent counties, Mn/DOT, and Metropolitan Council to develop and maintain the county's highway infrastructure. 2004 Proiects 2006 Proiects 1. County Highway (CH) 51-Bridge Replacement 23. CSAH 17-10th Avenue intersection improvements .. 2. County State Aid Highway (CSAH) l-Bridge 24. CSAH 21-Construct 4-lane divided roadway y;;' Replacement ~ !. I 3. County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 6-Box Culvert 25. CSAH 12-Reconstruct 2-lane urban roadway ,Scott Replacement 26. CH 56-Reconstruct and pave 2-lane rural roadway 4. CSAH 5-Construct divided roadway 27. CH 87-Reconstruct and pave 2-lane rural roadway __'.'m" . ,'""" , .... , '"" .~" 5. CSAH 5-Box culvert replacement 2007 Proiects 6. CSAH 15-Box culvert replacement 28. CSAH 21-Construct 4-lane divided roadway 7. CSAH 2-Round-about at Trunk Highway (TH) 13 intersection (MnDOT project) 2008 Proiects 8. CSAH 2-Construct 4-lane divided roadway from 29. CSAH 17 -Construct 4-lane divided roadway New Market to 1-35 SCOTT COUNTY 30. CSAH 21-Corridor improvements 9. CSAH 21-Construct 4-lane divided roadway Public Works 10. CSAH 78-TH 41 intersection improvements 31. CSAH 42-Widen to 6-lane divided roadway Division (MnDOT project) 32. CSAH 42-Huntington to Glendale widen to 6-lanes 11. CSAH 42-HuntingtonjGlendale access and signal revisions 5 YEAR 2005 Proiects HIGHWAY 12. CSAH 66-TH 21 intersection improvements CIP 13. CSAH 23-Box culvert replacement 14. CSAH 8-CSAH 23 intersection improvements 2004-2008 15. CSAH 37-Signal installation at TH 19 16. CSAH 86-Reconstruct 2-lane rural roadway SC01T COUNTY 17. CSAH 2-Reconstruct from CSAH 27 th rough New Public WOIb Division Market Highway Department 18. CSAH 82-Construct 4-lane divided roadway 600 Comdly 1iai1 East 19. CSAH 44-TH 13 intersection improvements Jordan, MN SS3S2 20. CSAH 44-Construct 4-lane divided roadway Phone: (952)496-8346 Fax: (952) 496-836S 21. CSAH 17-lnstall railroad crossing gates website: www.co.scott.mn.us 22. CSAH 17-4th Avenue Intersection improvements .._n_,_ -- - -.--- ~ Scott County, Minnesota rtJ~tt 5 Year Highwa.y Capital Improvement Program 2004 -- 2008 LEGEND 2004 2006 2008 2005 2007 - Approved 12-16-03 N W+E 8500 0 8500 17000 Map Date: February 5, 2004 ~.. , This Ii'lM'Ing Is neltler II t&galty recorded map nor II survey and Is nd Inten:ted to be used IJS one. ThIs ct8'l'llng Is II c:ompBilllon of records,lnformalon, and dllla bellied S Fcet Scale: RF.: h various cly, county, end state orne.s, end othersoun:es l!Ift'ectlng Ihe IIntll stmwn. and Is to be used for ref.tIlee purposes onty. Scott County Is nd responsble for any I inch = 17,000 feet I: 204,000 Nttt.rades herein conlmed. ItdlsO'lI!pandes are found, please ccried the Stott County SuNeyen 01"lle8. llWOUt N8mA~ 'DOC ClP -llNOlJt rID PmIfld Locllllon~ S~_OC"'LGIS\OFP"'RlUFNTS\TR"'N!;PORTAT10MPROJFCTS\..~",ClP APR .---- --- -~.~._-, ~- 2004 Approved 12-16-03 SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 2004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TOTAL ROAD TYPE OF PROJECT OTHER COUNTY Project NO. LOCA TION LENGTH CONSTRUCTION COST COSTS COSTS Note PRESERVATION -- County-Wide 10.00 Overlays/ Milling 1,500,000 0 1,500,000 1 Minnesota River - Blakeley 0.50 Bridge I<eplacement 5,328,700 4,784,700 544,000 5 Belle Plaine Twp 0.10 Bridge Replacement - 92776 228,050 185,000 43,050 6 Blakeley Twp 0.10 Bridge Replacement - L2987 228,000 185,000 43,000 15 Helena Twp - Sand Creek 0.10 Bridge Replacement - L3049 228,000 185,000 43,000 51 Blakeley Twp 9.05 Bridge Replacement - L3040 212,500 130,000 82,500 MANAGEMENT 2 TH 13 -- Intersection Improvement (Roundabout) 210,500 210 ,500 (1) 5 CSAH 5 to CSAH 7 1.00 New Alignment - 2 Lane Divided 364,940 364,940 (2) 23 170th to TH 13 0.23 Realign/Signal 850,000 850,000 (3) 42 Huntington/Glendale (Segment 8) -- Signal/ Access 300,000 300,000 (4) 78 TH 41 -- Intersection Improvements 50,000 50,000 (5) -- Unspecified -- Traffic Signals 841,250 841,250 Spot Safety Contingency EXPANSION 2 NM Area Hall to Interstate 35 2.53 Reconstruct - 4 Lane Divided 6,030,000 220,000 5,810,000 21 CSAH 27 to Dakota County Line 3.00 Reconstruct - 4 Lane Divided 10 ,575 ,000 750,000 9,825,000 $26,946,940 $6,439,700 $20,507,240 (1) MnDot Project, County Share Only (2) City of Belle Plaine Project (MOU Inplace), County Share Only (3) City of Prior Lake Project, County Share Only (4) First Phase of CSAH 42 Segment 8 Implementation, Reprogrammed CSAH 27 Fen Funds, County Share Only (5) MnDOT Project, County Share Only 2004 4/23/2004 2005 Approved 12-16-03 SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TOTAL ROAD TYPE OF PROJECT OTHER COUNTY Project NO. LOCA TION LENGTH CONSTRUCTION COST COSTS COSTS Note PRESERVATION -- County-Wide 10.00 Overlay/Milling 1,500,000 1,500,000 23 Cedar Lake Twp - County Ditch #2 0.10 Bridge Replacement - L3960 300,000 195,000 105,000 MANAGEMENT 2 CSAH 27 TO NM Area Hall 1.47 Reconstruct - 2 & 3 Lane Segments 3,934,000 275,000 3,659,000 8 CSAH 23 to Calmor Ave. 0.50 Intersection Improvements 1,700,000 1,700,000 17 Railroad Tracks - Shakopee -- Railroad Crossing Gates 150,250 122,625 27,625 17 4th Avenue -- Intersection Improvement 643,500 490,500 153,000 37 TH 19 -- Traffic Signal & Intersection Imp 375,000 240,000 135.000 (1) 66 TH 21 -- Intersection Improvements 250,000 250,000 (2) 86 CSAH 23 to CSAH 27 3.20 2 Lane Rural Reconstruction 2,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 (3) -. Unspecified -- Traffic Signals 1,100,000 1,100,000 Spot Safety/Contingency EXPANSION 27 CSAH 44 to 0.30 Mi North 0.30 Reconstruct - 4 Lane Divided 2,141,000 470,000 1,671,000 44 Prior Lake CL - CSAH 27 1.00 Reconstruct - 4 Lane Divided 2,291,000 365,000 1,926,000 82 CSAH 21 to CSAH 17 2.50 Reconstruct - 4 Lane Divided 14,410,000 6,800,000 7,610,000 $30,794,750 $9,958,125 $20,836,625 (1) MnDOT /City Project (2) City/MnDOT Project, County Share Only (3) Cooperative Agreement Project with Rice County. Being evaluated for Federal Funding Application 2005 4/23/2004 2006 Approved 12-16-03 SCOTT COUNlY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TOTAL ROAD lYPE OF PROJECT OTHER COUNlY Project NO. LOCA TION LENGTH CONSTRUCTION COST COSTS COSTS Note PRESERV ATION -- County-Wide 10.00 Overlay/Milling 1,500,000 1,500,000 12 CSAH 17 to TH 13 2.50 Reconstruct - 2 Lane Urban 2,600,000 350,000 2,250,000 MANAGEMENT 17 10th Avenue -- Intersection Improvements 565,000 508,500 56,500 44 TH 13/Main Ave Intersection -- Intersection Improvements 100,000 100,000 56 CH 23 to CH 87 1.50 Reconstruct - 2 Lane Rural/Surface 900,000 900,000 87 CH 56 to CH 8 3.00 Reconstruct - 2 Lane Rural/Surface 1,800,000 1,800,000 -- Unspecified -- Traffic Signals 1,100,000 1,100,000 Spot Safety Contingency EXPANSION 21 CSAH 16 to CSAH 18 1.40 4 Lane Divided 4,480,000 800,000 3,680,000 $13,045,000 $1,658,500 $11,386,500 2006 4/23/2004 2007 Approved 12.16.03 SCOTT COUN1Y HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 2007 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TOTAL ROAD TYPE OF PROJECT OTHER COUNTY PROJECT NO. LOCA nON LENGTH CONSTRucnON COST COSTS COSTS NOTE PRESERVATION -- County- Wide 10.00 Overlay/Milling 1,500,000 1,500,000 MANAGEMENT -- Unspecified -- Traffic Signals 1,150,000 1,150,000 Spot Safety Contingency EXPANSION 21 CSAH 42 to CSAH 16 1.50 4 Lane Divided 5,645,000 800,000 4,845,000 42 Huntington - Glendale (Segment 8) 1.00 Corridor Improvements 3,640,000 500,000 3,140,000 (1) $11,935,000 $1,300,000 $10,635,000 (1) Second Phase of CSAH 42 Segment 8 Implementation, Reprogrammed CSAH 27 Fen Funds 2007 4/23/2004 2008 Approved 12.16.03 SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TOTAL ROAD TYPE OF PROJECT OTHER COUNTY PROJECT NO. LOCA TION LENGTH CONSTRUCTION COST COSTS COSTS NOTE PRESERVATION -- County-Wide 10.00 Overlay/Milling 1,500,000 1,500,000 MANAGEMENT 21 CH 82 to CH87 3.50 Corridor Improvements 10 ,305 ,000 1,750,000 8,555,000 (1) -- Unspecified -- Traffic Signals 1,150,000 1,150,000 Spot Safety Contingency EXPANSION 17 St. Francis to CH 42 2.00 Reconstruct - 4 Lane Divided 7,400,000 1,150,000 6,250,000 42 Boone to Louisiana 1.00 6 Lane Divided Reconstruct 8,020,000 2,000,000 6,020,000 (2) $28,375,000 $4,900,000 $23,475,000 (1) Applying for Federal Hazard Elimination Funds in 2003 (2) Cost sharing yet to be determined - preliminary design is not completed, long term improvement costs. 2008 4/23/2004 Scott County Transportation Studies In an effort to be proactive in response to the dramatic growth and development that the County is experiencing, the Transportation Plan component of the County 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update contains a number of Transportation Planning policies and goals. Some of the most important include: ~ Promote the development of a comprehensive roadway system. ~ Preserve highway rights-of-way. ~ Preserve and improve the functional capacity of all highways within the system. ~ Address existing and future transportation issues and traffic needs. In order to meet these goals and policies, Scott County has identified numerous transportation studies that need to be completed. A full listing of these studies is attached. All of these studies will need to be completed in partnership with other agencies, including cities, townships, MnDOT, and developers. Scott County has 10 studies in progress, and has identified a need for 11 additional studies. These study needs were developed consistent with issues identified in. the Transportation Plan and in cooperation with City Engineers. Due to resource constraints, these study needs require prioritization. The criteria we have used to identify and prioritize studies are as follows: ~ Safety ~ Land Development Opportunity ~ Funding Opportunities and Partnerships ~ Continuity and Development of an Efficient System ~ Traffic Growth and Volume ~ Level of Service / Congestion Scott County is soliciting your input into the identification and prioritization of these studies. Please give this thoughtful consideration and provide your comments back to us with your comments on the Highway Capital Improvement Program. With your input, we can put our resources to work on the most critical issues facing Scott . County. With your continued cooperation, we can make Scott County a better place to live, work, and play. W:\WORD\CIP\2004-2008\Studies Memo.doc Scott County TRANSPORTATION STUDIES STATUS FOR 2005 BUDGET PROCESS Study Areas Legend .. Complete (by 12/2004) ~ .. In Progress (by 12/2004) N .. Future Study Need p."y I t~ 21 r/ ,t-' & ~..-;_-.-, t I .,0. a.~ I ~, I '<'" t..,...u / ,,-. . . "'. ~ /: J ."'-i , 59 62 HELENA " ..- u: 2 0 - ------.~~-~--.-. s :\Iocalgis\departments\transportation\projects\studies. apr ,-- --- Scott County Public Works DRAFT TRANSPORT A liON STUDIES LIST For 2005 Budget Process COST STUDY # ROAD LOCATION TYPE TIME RANGE RESOURCE COMMENTS . Studies In Progress . . . 5 CSAH 8 CSAH 23 Intersection Relocation SHORT LOW STAFF Safety design Interchange Design & RJW 6 CSAH 9 TH 169/TH 282 preservation MED LOW STAFF Started with MnDOT the lead $400,000-$500,000 2-year study. Scopinig contract approved with SRF. 13 CSAH 21 CSAH 42 to Shakopee Bypass BIS LONG SPECIAL CONSULT Initial TAC meeting 3/28/02. Public Info meeting in September. Corridor Alignment! CONSULT & Potential Future County Highway Need and alignment to be reviewed as part 17 CR70 TH 169 to CSAH 17 RJW preservation MED-LONG MED STAFF of Sand Creek study. RJW preservation-long term $250,000 MnDOT funds available for study TH41/ New Major River LONG- CONSULT & Consultant selected 8/02. 22 TH 169 TH 169 to TH 212 Crossing! Alignment 3 Years SPECIAL MNDOT Scott County Cost Share - $25,000 Study start .;. September 2002 Louisiana Ave. to East County Feasibility Study of Long-term 29 CSAH 42 Line improvements MED MED CONSULT Future congestion expected based on 20-year modeling and recent studies Study Needs: Corridor Alignment 1 CSAH 2 TH 169 to CR 61 RJW Identification MED MED CONSULT Long term needs Future Interchange Design RJW . RJW preservation. 2 CSAH 2 135 . Identification MED LOW MNDOT & STAFF Corridor Alignment System continuity - study partially complete 8 CSAH 15 CSAH 10 to TH 282 RJW Identification MED LOW STAFF ON HOLD Corridor Alignment! MNDOT, CITY & TH 169 study 14 CR61 CR 66 to TH 169 Intersection Location MED MED CONSULT RJW preservation Corridor Alignment Continuity gap - Vergus to CR 81 16 CSAH 68 TH 13 to CSAH 23 RJW Identification SHORT LOW STAFF Study coordinated with development .. Future Interchange Design RJW 18 CSAH 78 TH 169ffH 41 Identification LONG LOW-MED CONSULT TH 169 IRC recommendation Future Interchange Design RJW preservation-long term 20 . CSAH 86 135 RJW identification MED LOW MNDOT & STAFF Involves Scott, Dakota, & Rice Courities and MnDOT CSAH 16 Corridor Alignment RJW preservation and coordination with future annexation. Coordinate with 26 (17th Ave) CSAH 78 to CSAH 15 RJW Identification MED MED CONSULT River Crossing study recommendations. . TH 169 in Sand Creek Twp (North Corridor Alignment CONSULT & Study to consider possibility of rerouting TH 282 north of Jordan to deal with 30 TH 282 of Jordan) R/W Identification MED MED MNDOT existing and future access/mobility issues KEY:. TIME COST SHORT: < 6 months LOW: < $25,000 MED: 6 - 18 months MED: $25,000 - $50,000 LONG: > 18 months HIGH: > $50,000 w:\word\studies\general\CIP Draft 2005 DRAFT - May, 2004