HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 03, 2026 - Council PacketSHAKOPE E
Shakopee City Council Regular Meeting
Tuesday, March 3, 2026
7:00 PM
City Hall, 485 Gorman Street
Vision: Shakopee is a distinctive river town with a variety of business, cultural, and
recreational opportunities in a safe, welcoming, and attractive environment. Our vision
is for Shakopee to continue being the place people want to live, work, and play!
Mission: Our mission is to deliver high quality services essential to maintaining a safe
and sustainable community. We commit to doing this cost-effectively, with integrity and
transparency.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Oath of Office for Police Chief Jamie Pearson
5. Approval of Agenda
6. Consent Agenda
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these unless a council member or staff requests, in which event the item will be removed
from the consent agenda for separate discussion & action.
6.a Award of Contracts for Fire Station #2 Remodel
6.b Scott County Public Health's Statewide Health Improvement Partnership Grant
Award
6.c Award Low Bid Contract for Valley Crest Park improvements (PR25-002) and
Approve Installation of play equipment by Kompan and Purchase of Shelter
from Northland Recreation, both using the Sourcewell Contract.
6.d Award a Contract for the Old Carriage Court Corridor Improvements Project
and Accept a Proposal from Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc. for Construction
1
Services
6.e Accept a Feasibility Report for the L16 Dual Forcemain Improvements.
6.f Authorize Final Acceptance and Payment for the Valley Crest Trail Project
6.g Accept Donation from Shakopee Youth Baseball Association, Resolution
R2026-033.
6.h Approve the renewal of Consumption & Display Permits for 2026.
6.i Approve a Temporary liquor license for Dilemma Brewing Co. dba Shakopee
Brew Hall.
6.j Approve a Special Event Permit for the Shakopee Chamber and Visitors
Bureau, and suspend city code 114.11 to allow consumption on city streets, for
the Shakopee Brew Hall Bock Party Event.
6.k Accept a Proposal from Alliant Engineering for the SS4A Safety Action Plan
Development
6.1 Approval of the February 17, 2026, City Council Minutes
6.m Declare one forfeited vehicle as surplus property and authorize disposal
6.n Approve the Interim Use Permit (IUP) and Purchase of Temporary Fire Station
2 Facilities
6.o Approve Municipal State Aid Street System Designations
7. Public Comment
Individuals may address the City Council about any item not on the regular agenda. Speakers are
requested to come to the center table, state their name and address for the clerk's record, and limit their
remarks to three minutes. The City Council will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but
may refer the matter to staff for a follow up report or direct that matter be scheduled on an upcoming
agenda.
8. Business removed from consent agenda
9. Recess for Economic Development Authority Meeting
10. Reconvene
11. Workshop
11.a 2025 Community Survey Update
12. Reports
2
Liaison and Administration
12.a City Bill List
12.b News and Announcements
13. Other Business
14. Adjourn to March 17, 2026, at 7:00 pm
3
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.a
March 3, 2026
Award of Contracts for Fire Station #2 Remodel
Nate Reinhardt, Finance Director
Action to be considered:
Adopt Resolution R2026-036
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
On January 20, 2026, City Council approved the advertisement for bids to remodel Fire
Station #2. This renovation is critical to accommodate future staffing of the station. The
building alterations include the addition of five dormitories, additional locker and
changing areas, additional showers, a larger kitchen pantry, enhanced decontamination
capability, and a new rooftop mechanical unit.
Terra Construction prepared and advertised bid documents and opened bids on
February 24th, 2026. A total of 62 bids were received for the various categories. The low
bidders are as follows:
Description
QCO1A Final Clean
QCO2A Selective Demo
QCO3B Concrete & Masonry
QCO5C Steel
QCO6A Carpentry
QCO6E Casework
QCO7L Roofing
QCO7N Joint Sealants
QCO8A Doors Frames Hardware
QCO8C Glass
QCO9A Gypsum Board
QCO9B Tile
QCO9C ACT
QCO9E Flooring
QCO9J Painting
Low Bid
$10,170
$14,720
$57,985
$66,258
$64,500
$48,728
$124,600
$6,585
$24,500
$11,840
$43,760
$13,460
$16,800
$7,796
$14,415
Low Bidder
Cleaniac's LLC
Lloyds Construction Services, Inc
Northland Concrete & Masonry
Superior Steel Erectors
Kellingon Construction
Reiling Construction Co., Inc.
Berwald Roofing Co. Inc.
Molin Concrete Products
Wheeler Hardware Company
United Glass Inc.
Common Links Construction LLC
Grazzini Brothers & Company
Minnesota Acoustics Inc.
Marlow Flooring Inc.
Colorful Concepts Painting
4
QC10C Bird Netting
QC21A Fire Suppression
BC22B Plumbing & Mech
QC26A Electrical
$16,290
$36,400
$289,000
$85,000
H21 Group
Summit Fire Protection
Falcon Mechanical Inc
Teknik Inc.
In addition to the construction bids, there are associated construction manager costs
(contract with Terra Construction approved October 7, 2025,) for total hard costs of
$1,192,312. Soft costs furnished and/or installed separately by the city, including design
fees, station alerting system, plymovent, appliances, furniture and fixtures, temporary
facilities for staff and a training maze, totaling $551,867. The project also includes a ten
percent contingency of $95,281. Th is brings the total project cost to $1,839,458. The
original project estimate presented on January 20, 2026 was $1,812,941.
City staff received multiple separate quotes for installing a Plymovent vehicle exhaust
extraction system for the apparatus bays at Fire Station #2. The system will remove
vehicle exhaust during start-ip and as it exits the apparatus bay. Staff recommends
awarding the contract to TNC Industries, Inc. in the amount of $67,972 (lowest quote).
Electrical and duct work are estimated at an additional cost of $8,000, for a total of
$75,972.
City staff also received a proposal from Ancom Communications for a station alerting
system in the amount of $97,079, including the installation. Staff recommends the
Honeywell Phoenix G2 system, which offers native integration with the future Hennepin
County Tri-Tech CAD service. To ensure compliance and manufacturer -backed support,
the installation will be handled by ANCOM, the region's sole approved provider.
City staff also obtained separate quotes for a Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA)
Washer, a purpose-built cabinet washer designed to decontaminate SCBA, PPE, and other
firefighting accessories in accordance with NFPA 1851 standards. Staff recommends
purchasing and installing the unit from MacQueen Equipment for $29,350, the lowest
quote received.
Staff also recommends including the Drager Training Maze in the training mezzanine.
After reviewing several options, the Drager maze best meets the department's needs and
fits the available space. Because purchasing directly from the manufacturer is the only
option, staff recommends purchasing and installing the unit from Drager, including
freight and installation, for a total cost of $79,589.61.
The City contracted with CNH Architects under two separate contracts $19,400 on March
5
7, 2025 for the preliminary design and $41,400 on October 7, 2025 for the final design
and construction phase. As the project design progressed the replacement and upgrade
of the roof top mechanical units were added to the scope. A structural engineering
review was added and determined the existing roof would not support the new unit
without steel framing, which had to be designed and detailed. Ductwork also needed to
be revised throughout the building to support the new office/residence area. These
improvements will provide much better HVAC control for this portion of the station. CNH
is proposing an additional agreement of $42,643 to cover this additional work.
Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution R2026-036, approving contracts for the renovation of Fire Station #2.
Budget Impact:
The project will utilize the current CIP allocation designated for Fire Station #2 renovation
($1,000,000) and separate CIP allocations for rooftop air handling units ($250,000), AV
mini -splits ($80,000) and roof replacement ($40,000), totaling $1,370,000.
Based on the low bid amount, the updated total estimated project cost is as follows:
CIP
Estimate Based on Bid
Award
Construction Cost
$1,370,000
$1,192,312
Owner Soft Costs
551,867
Contingency
95,281
Total
$1,370,000
$1,839,458
Construction costs exceeding the budgeted CIP amount will be paid from the Buildings
Fund balance.
Attachments:
Resolution R2026-036 Fire Station #2.pdf
Terra Letter of Recommendation SFS2 02.26.26.pdf
Shakopee Fire #02 Low Bid Summary 02.26.26 Rev2.pdf
Plymovent - TNC Industries Quote.doc
Station Alerting - Ancom Proposal.pdf
Shakopee Roto Decon SCBA Washer Quote 12-11-25.pdf
Shakopee FD - SCBA Confidence Maze - Q#1 36338092 R2.pdf
CNH Proposal - Additional Scope 3-3-26.pdf
6
RESOLUTION R2026-036
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR THE
RENOVATION OF FIRE STATION #2
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee through its Construction Manager as Agent, Terra Construction has
solicited bids for work from plans developed by CNH Architects for Fire Station #2 improvements and;
WHEREAS, Terra Construction has advertised for these bids and solicited proposals and has verified
that the bidders have provided the necessary bid bonds and verified the accuracy of their bids and;
WHEREAS, Terra Construction has held a bid session to award the work and;
WHEREAS, City staff has received quotes for installing a Plymovent vehicle exhaust extraction system
and;
WHEREAS, City staff has received a proposal for installing a station alert system that will integrate
with Hennepin County's Tri-Tech CAD service and;
WHEREAS, City staff has received quotes for a Self -Contained Breathing Apparatus Washer and;
WHEREAS, City staff has received a proposal for installation of a training maze and;
WHEREAS, CNH has proposed an additional agreement covering the design work for the replacement
of the roof top mechanical units, HVAC system and related structural engineering;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
AS FOLLOWS:
The following bids are awarded:
Description
QC01A Final Clean
QC02A Selective Demo
QCO3B Concrete & Masonry
QCO5C Steel
QC06A Carpentry
QC06E Casework
QCO7L Roofing
QCO7N Joint Sealants
QC08A Doors Frames Hardware
QC08C Glass
QC09A Gypsum Board
QCO9B Tile
QC09C ACT
QC09E Flooring
QC09J Painting
QC10C Bird Netting
QC21A Fire Suppression
BC22B Plumbing & Mech
QC26A Electrical
Low B i d
10,170
14,720
57,985
66,258
64,500
48,728
124,600
6,585
24,500
11,840
43,760
13,460
16,800
7,796
14,415
16,290
36,400
289,000
85,000
Low Bidder
Cleaniac's LLC
Lloyds Construction Services, Inc
Northland Concrete & Masonry
Superior Steel Erectors
Kellingon Construction
Reiling Construction Co., Inc.
Berwald Roofing Co. Inc.
Molin Concrete Products
Wheeler Hardware Company
United Glass Inc.
Common Links Construction LLC
Grazzini Brothers & Company
Minnesota Acoustics Inc.
Marlow Flooring Inc.
Colorful Concepts Painting
H2I Group
Summit Fire Protection
Falcon Mechanical Inc
Teknik Inc.
7
The following additional agreements are awarded:
Description
Plymovent Vehicle Exhaust System
Station Alerting System
Self -Contained Breathing Apparatus Washer
Training Maze
RTU, HVAC, Structural Engineering Design
Amount
$67,972
97,079
29,350
79,582
42,643
Vendor
TNC Industries, Inc.
Ancom
MacQueen Equipment
Drager
CNH Architects
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 3rd
day of March 2026.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Prepared by:
City of Shakopee
485 Gorman Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
8
IfTerra
CONSTRUCTION
February 26, 2026
Ms. Chelsea Petersen
485 Gorman St.
Shakopee, MN 55124
cpetersen@shakopeemn.gov
RE: Shakopee Fire Station #2 Remodel
Dear Ms. Petersen,
763.463.0220
877.604.2118
info@terragc.com
terragc.com
On behalf of the City of Shakopee, Terra Construction (Terra) received bids at the Shakopee City Hall on
Tuesday, February 24th, 2026 for the above referenced project. The Bids were received, open and
publicly read aloud for one (1) distinct bid category. Eighteen (18) Quote Categories were received
electronically by Terra.
Terra has completed its review of the bids and recommends that the award of contracts includes the
bidding contractors listed in the attached bid tabulation summary.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions.
Respectfully Submitted,
Terra Construction
Kory Reiners
Preconstruction Manager
Attachment: Low Bid Summary
Bid Tabulation
0
21025 Commerce Blvd, Suite 1000 11 Rogers, MN 55374
9
BID OPENING FOR: Shakopee Fire Station #2 Remodel
BID DATE: 2/24/2026
Aim Terra
CONSTRUCTION
LOW BID SUMMARY
Description
QC01A Final Clean
$
LOW BIDS RECEIVED
10,170
Apparent Low Bidders
Cleaniac's LLC
# of Bids
Received
3
QCO2A Selective Demo
$
14,720
Lloyds Construction Services, Inc
5
QC03B Concrete & Masonry
$
57,985
Northland Concrete & Masonry
3
QC05C Steel
$
66,258
Superior Steel Erectors
2
QC06A Carpentry
$
64,500
Kellingon Construction
5
QC06E Casework
$
48,728
Reiling Construction Co., Inc.
4
QC07L Roofing
$
124,600
Berwald Roofing Co. Inc.
2
QC07N Joint Sealants
$
6,585
Molin Concrete Products
1
QC08A Doors Frames Hardware
$
24,500
Wheeler Hardware Company
3
QC08C Glass
$
11,840
United Glass Inc.
2
QC09A Gypsum Board
$
43,760
Common Links Construction LLC
5
QC09B Tile
$
13,460
Grazzini Brothers & Company
2
QC09C ACT
$
16,800
Minnesota Acoustics Inc.
3
QC09E Flooring
$
7,796
Marlow Flooring Inc.
5
QC09J Painting
$
14,415
Colorful Concepts Painting
3
QC10C Bird Netting
$
16,290
H2I Group
1
QC21A Fire Suppression
$
36,400
Summit Fire Protection
1
BC22B Plumbing & Mech
$
289,000
Falcon Mechanical Inc
6
QC26A Electrical
$
85,000
Teknik Inc.
6
SUBTOTAL
$
952,807
62
Owner Construction Contingency (Included In Soft Costs Below)
$
-
City of Shakopee
Preconstruction, CM Staffing & General Requirement Reimbursables Estimate
$
777,350
Terra Construction
CGL Insurance
$
6,500
Terra Construction
Permit
$
22,083
City of Shakopee
CM Fee (3.5%) of Subtotal Above
$
39,573
Terra Construction
TOTAL
1,192,312
CITY OF SHAKOPEE SOFT COST ALLOWANCES
CNH Design Fees - SD
$
19,400
Station Alerting
$
98,000
Plymovent
$
75,972
Appliances
$
55,000
Furniture: Dispatch, Work Stations, Conference Room, Common areas, Laundry, Dorms, Kitchen,
$
54,450
Training Maze
$
80,000
Owner Construction Contingency
$
95,281
Temporary Workspace and Living Quarters and Temporary Restroom and Shower Trailer
$
75,000
Special Inspections Allowance
$
10,000
CNH Design Fees (DD through CA)
$
84,043
TOTAL SOFT COSTS
$
647,146
TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY
TOTAL HARD (CONSTRUCTION COSTS)
$ 1,192,312
TOTAL SOFT COSTS ALLOWANCES
$ 647,146
TOTAL HARD AND SOFT COSTS
$ 1,839,458
Alternates
Alt #01
Deduct Apparatus Bay Trench Drain Work
$
(4,460)
Alt #02
Add Paint to full Height at Apparatus in lieu of 4'0" AFF
6,840
Alt #03
Deduct Exterior Concrete Work
$ (8,000)
*If accepted, a different contractor is low.
10
TNC
Industries, Inc.
February 3, 2026
Shakopee Fire
Attn: Joe Simon
2700 Vierling Drive E.
Shakopee, MN 55379
Re: Station Two Remodel
Diesel Exhaust Extraction System
Dear Chief,
We offer the following price for installing a Plymovent vehicle exhaust extraction system
in Shakopee Fire Station Number Two.
This vehicle exhaust extraction system meets or exceeds the NFPA requirements for a
source capture system as well as the Minnesota State Mechanical Code requirements
for a source capture system.
The system in the station will be covering five vehicles with diesel exhaust engines.
Coverage will be provided for one vehicle in each of the five bays using the Plymovent
SBTA31- Slide Balancing Track Assembly. This model will provide coverage at start up
and as the vehicle exits the bay. The SBTA31 will cover a distance of 38' from the
tailpipe when parked, to the door.
We will provide one Plymovent 5hp fan with a Plymovent OS3 Controller, five wireless
transmitters for starting the system, five magnetic grabbers, five TopGrade Stainless Steel
conicals, ductwork, installation labor and miscellaneous materials.
The price for the work outlined above is $67,972.
Price does not include roofing or electrical. This work can be covered by the trades doing
the remodel. The roofing consists of a 12" tall cone flashing for a spiral duct coming up
from the fan. The electrical consists of running power to the Plymovent OS3 control
panel and running power from the panel to the Plymovent 5hp fan. A disconnect should
be provided.
PO Box 326 — Wayzata, MN 55391 — Phone (763) 559-0808 — Email TomEgangtncind.com
11
The price is based on installing the Plymovent system in summer or early fall of 2026.
The installation is not affected by the remodel and therefore, it can happen any time after
the installation is approved.
We appreciate the opportunity to work with your department to protect your firefighters.
Sincerely,
TNC Industries, Inc.
Thomas P. Egan
Vice President
2
12
3
13
Shakopee Fire Station #2 -
USDD Station Alerting
Minimal Plan Proposal
ANCOM
DELIVERS
SOLUTIONS
1800 Cliff Road East
Burnsville, MN 55337
(952) 808-7699
7/11/2025
Contained herein is the proposal for installing and
commissioning the US Digital Designs Station
Alerting System at Shakopee Fire Station 2.
14
ANCOM
COMMUNICATIONS INC
4871 19TH STREET NW ROCHESTER. MINNESOTA 55901
SALES, SERVICE AND RENTAL 507-261-1917
Introduction
ANCOM Communications is a Burnsville, MN based, Motorola -authorized two-way
radio dealer providing sales, service and rental of Motorola two-way radios and pagers. Since
1991, ANCOM has worked with businesses to identify their communication needs and provide
cost-effective, innovative solutions. Our customer base spans the utility, manufacturing,
construction, chemical, government, and public safety industries.
ANCOM Communications is a fully authorized Motorola Service Center. Since 1999,
ANCOM has been serving the communications service needs of commercial and public safety
customers throughout Minnesota and western Wisconsin. ANCOM is recognized as a "Motorola
Service Elite Specialist." (Motorola's highest service facility designation) We are also classified
as a Certified Service Center by the Electronics Technicians Association International, an
independent national organization.
Our technicians are career professionals in the communications industry. We invest
heavily on training and certification to ensure that our technical staff is at the fore -front of the
quickly evolving field.
E-MAIL: saies@aricom_o ; ser ice@ancom.org WEBSI.TE: wmv.ancorn,org
el MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS
Ra :. S h,tidrs (i•`.a'lrrI PAr*,nPr
15
ANCOM
COMMUNICATIONS INC
4871 19TH STREET NW ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 559€ 1
SALES, SERVICE AND RENTAL 507-287-7917
Statement of Work
ANCOM will design, furnish, install, and commission the USDD station alerting system
at Shakopee Fire Station 2.
This includes the following tasks:
• Design the system
o ANCOM will work with the fire personnel, and the building design engineers to
provide a completely functional system.
o Slight changes (speaker location, sign location, etc.) to the design can be made up
to the time of actual installation.
o Major design changes may require additional materials not included in this
proposal.
• Furnish the system
o ANCOM will order all materials required to complete the installation.
o Materials will be stored at the ANCOM warehouse until the time of installation.
o The schedule of delivery of materials will be coordinated with the AHJ.
• Installation of the system
o The entire design will be verified by the fire department staff and the building
design team prior to installation.
o Final installation schedule will be coordinated through the AHJ.
o Installation includes function testing of all components.
o Upon completion of the installation, the USDD Station Checklist and Station
Acceptance forms must be signed by the AHJ prior to commissioning.
• Commissioning the system
o USDD will schedule and deploy a station startup technician to complete final
commissioning of the system.
o Full functionality of the USDD system is dependent on LOGIS having backhaul
connection to the server available.
Once the project is complete, closeout documentation including test results, as -built diagrams,
and equipment cut -sheets will be provided to the customer
E-MAIL: sa s@ncom,_o ; ser ice@ancom.org WEBSI.TE: wmv.ancorn,org
el MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS
Ra :. S h,tidrs (i•`.a'lrrI PAr*,nPr
16
ANCOM
4871 19TH STREET NW ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55901
COMMUNICATIONS INC
SALES, SERVICE AND RENTAL 507-287-'E917
Quote Breakdown
The price for this system, as designed, is as follows:
USDD Station Alerting Material Subtotal:
$ 71,578.93
USDD Station Alerting Labor Subtotal:
$ 25,500.00
Vinco Electrical Contract Material/Labor Subtotal
$ 0.0
USDD Station Alerting Grand Total:
$ 97,078.93
This quote is valid for 90 days from the date above.
Brandon Kollbaum Date: 7/11/2025
Ancom Communications
Authority Having Jurisdiction Date:
oi MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS
E-MAIL: saies@an.com_o; ser ica@ancom.o WEBSITEW,anozirr ., r �J s.-Iuti,r P.h ireI PRr,n4
17
ANCOM
COMMUNICATIONS INC
4871 19TH STREET NW ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 559€ 1
SALES, SERVICE AND RENTAL 507-287-7917
Assumptions:
• Materials are ordered upon receipt of a purchase order for the full project cost, as
well as 50% down.
• All work can occur during normal business hours, M -F (8:00 AM - 4:30 PM)
• Escorts will not be required.
• Customer agreed to provide lift.
• Acceptable equipment locations are available for the required equipment.
• Access to all areas will be made available throughout the entire process from project start
to completion.
• All labor is non-union.
• Quote does not include any applicable taxes.
• All AC power is to be existing or furnished by others.
• Assumes existing accessible cable pathways in all risers.
• System to be installed per the design and any changes may result in additional material
and labor costs to be paid for by the customer.
• Delays beyond the control of ANCOM and their installers will result in additional costs
to be paid for by the customer.
• Project construction will be scheduled only after all materials have been received by
ANCOM.
• All vertical cable pathways and roof penetrations will be verified prior to installation and
furnished by others.
• Conduit and wall boxes for equipment mounting locations will be verified prior to
installation and furnished by others.
E-MAIL: sa s@ncom,_o ; ser ice@ancom.org WEBSI.TE: wmv.ancorn,org
el MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS
Ra :. S h,tidrs (i•`.a'lrrI PAr*,nPr
18
Ship To: Shakopee Fire Department
ATTN: Dave Giddings
2700 Vierling Drive East
Shakopee, MN 55379
Invoice To: SHAKOPEE FIRE DEPT
485 Gorman Street
Shakopee MN 55379
Attention: DAVE GIDDINGS
MacQueen
350 Austin Circle
Delafield, WI 53018
(262) 646-5911
Fax: (262) 646-5912
Branch
16 - DELAFIELD, WI
Date
12/11/2025
Time
11:46:38 (O)
Page
1
Account No
SHAKO004
Phone No
Est No 01
047718
Ship Via
BEST WAY
Purchase Order
QUOTE
Tax ID No
Salesperson
285 / 555
ESTIMATE EXPIRY DATE: 01/10/2026
PARTS ESTIMATE - NOT AN INVOICE
Part#
Description U
*PLEASE CONTACT YOUR SALES REP, SCOTT BAKOS
WITH ANY QUESTIONS: 952-300-7983 (CELL), OR EMAIL
SCOTT.BAKOS@MACQUEENGROUP.COM
*
*SHIPPING AND HANDLING NOT INCLUDED*
*
REFERENCE NUMBER: 047718
CAC-DCN-2401-NA
Qty
ROTO DECON WASH 1
CIRCUL-AIR Roto-Decon Washer for SCBA
systems, boots, helmets, and other hard
goods. 240v, 1ph, 60 hz
CAC-INSTALL-WASHHM-1 INSTALLATION
CIRCUL-AIR HARD MOUNT EXTRACTOR
INSTALLATION
*ALL INSTALLATION SITES MUST HAVE
COMPLETED A SITE SURVEY PRIOR TO
SCHEDULING A TECHNICIAN*
Authorization:
1
Price Amount
27500.00 27500.00
1850.00 1850.00
Subtotal: 29350.00
Tax:
TOTAL:
.00
29350.00
VisitUsOnline
www.macqueengroup.com
19
Draper
Quotation
Customer no.
93095640
Customer
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
FIRE DEPARTMENT
CRM USE - D017
2700 VIERLING DR E
SHAKOPEE MN 55379-3714
Your request
RFP REVISION DATE: 07/10/2025
Your contact person
JIM HAWLEY
Tel.: 234-430-2930
jim.hawley@draeger.com
Dear Customer,
Thank you for your inquiry. Please find enclosed our corresponding offer.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Quotation no.:
Responsible:
Telephone:
Fax:
E-mail:
Best regards
Draeger Inc.
136338092
JIM HAWLEY
234-430-2930
Quotation no. Date of offer
136338092 I 02/26/2026
Please reference on inquiries
Payer 93095640
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
FIRE DEPARTMENT
CRM USE - D017
2700 VIERLING DR E
SHAKOPEE MN 55379-3714
Ship -To party 93095640
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
FIRE DEPARTMENT
CRM USE - D017
2700 VIERLING DR E
SHAKOPEE MN 55379-3714
jim.hawley@draeger.com
This document has been electronically generated and is valid without a signature.
Draeger Inc.
Our Tax ID: 23-1699096
3135 Quarry Road; Telford, PA 18969
An Equal Opportunity Employer M / F / V / H
Telephone 800-437-2437
http://www.draeger.com
Remit to:
LOCKBOX (Standard USPS)
Draeger, Inc.
PO Box 13369
Newark, New Jersey
07101-3362
Remit to: Remit US Wire Transfers to:
LOCKBOX (Overnight) Account Name: Draeger Inc.
FIS - Lockbox Operations Account Number: 00-494-936
Attn:Draeger, Inc., Lockbox #13369 Transit Routing: 021001033
101 Woodcrest Road SWIFT: BKTRUS33
Suite 201 Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08003 60 Wall Street 25th FI, New York, NY 10005
20
Draper
Quotation
Customer no.
93095640
Page 2 / 6
Pos.
0010
0020
0030
Quant.
1 EA
2 EA
3 EA
Part no. Description
PLEASE SUBMIT / REFER TO THIS QUOTATION
WHEN PLACING YOUR ORDER
1903015 SCBA CONFIDENCE MAZE
Drager SCBA Confidence Maze
Includes design, construction, manuals,
and Train -the -Trainer course from
certified Drager Swede Survival Trainer.
#Maze constructed from a tubular steel
framework with wire mesh side panels
and thick wood floor panels.
#Overall Maze Size # 4 Sections Wide X
6 Sections long X 2 Sections High
#Crawl Section Dimension 39"
(1000mm) high by 31.5" (800mm) wide
#Obstacles
o(4) Four Pass Through (Floor Trap Door)
0(1) One Crawling Pipe
0(1) One Collapse Floor Prop
0(2) Two Manhole Obstacle
0(2) Two Casement Door
#Refer to sales drawings for overall
dimensions, layout, and obstacle detail
1903015 SLIDING DOOR PART
Drager SCBA Confidence Maze - Parts
#Obstacles: (2) Two Sliding Door Props
#Refer to sales drawings for overall
dimensions, layout, and obstacle detail
1903015 DIAGONAL HALF PART
Drager SCBA Confidence Maze - Parts
#Obstacles: (3) Three Grid D (Diagonal
Quotation no. Date of offer
136338092 I 02/26/2026
Please reference on inquiries
Payer
93095640
Unit price
USD
59, 595.03
1,281.20
320.88
Total price
USD
59, 595.03
2,562.40
962.64
21
Draper
Quotation
Customer no.
93095640
Page 3 / 6
Pos.
0040
0050
0060
0070
Quant.
4EA
4EA
1 EA
1 EA
Part no. Description
Half)
#Refer to sales drawings for overall
dimensions, layout, and obstacle detail
1903015 HORIZONTAL HALF PART
Drager SCBA Confidence Maze - Parts
#Obstacles: (4) Four Grid H Upper
(Horizontal Half)
#Refer to sales drawings for overall
dimensions, layout, and obstacle detail
1903015 VERTICAL HALF PART
Drager SCBA Confidence Maze - Parts
#Obstacles: (4) Four Grid V (Vertical
Half)
#Refer to sales drawings for overall
dimensions, layout, and obstacle detail
1903012 ON -SITE INSTALLATION & SET-UP
Estimate
1903010 FREIGHT TO CUSTOMER SITE
Estimate
Net value excl. Sales Tax
Total amount
Quotation no. Date of offer
136338092 I 02/26/2026
Please reference on inquiries
Payer
93095640
Unit price
USD
320.88
320.88
8,300.00
5,602.50
Total price
USD
1,283.52
1,283.52
8,300.00
5,602.50
79, 589.61
79,589.61
22
Draper
Quotation
Customer no.
93095640
Page 4 / 6
Pos.
Quant.
Part no. Description
PLEASE CHECK THIS QUOTE / ORDER
CAREFULLY FOR ACCURACY IN PRICING, PART
# AND DESCRIPTION. Contact Customer Service
immediately if there are any discrepancies. This
acknowledgement and note constitutes the entire
agreement with respect to the contemplated
transaction and supersedes all previous
negotiations, proposals, writings, advertisements,
or publications.
Date is subject to change upon receipt of order.
Payment terms:
Advanced payment
Offer valid until: 08/10/2025
Quotation no. Date of offer
136338092 I 02/26/2026
Please reference on inquiries
Payer
93095640
Unit price
USD
Total price
USD
23
Draper
Quotation
Customer no.
93095640
Page 5 / 6
Pos.
Quant.
Part no. Description
Approx. 14 weeks after receipt of purchase order and
notice to proceed. Subject to project backlog at time
of order entry
Notes:
1) Please note pricing does not take into
consideration any prevailing wage requirements,
unless communicated to Draeger beforehand. If a
prevailing wage requirement exists, customer will
provide this information prior to PO submittal to
Draeger. Pricing will be subject to change.
2) All funds are in US Dollars.
3) Bonding price, if required, not included.
4) Price information valid 30 days from date on form.
Pricing is subject to change once quotation is past
validity.
5) Any building or electrical contractor permits are
responsibility of customer and are not included.
6) Warranty is 12 months after handover.
7) Training Systems which have completed fabrication
but cannot be delivered due to delays on the part of
the customer, may be charged a Storage Fee in the
amount of 2% of the project value, to be assessed
every thirty days after an initial 30 -day free storage
period has passed, until delivery is possible.
8) Milestone Payment terms:
A. 25% of total project price will be invoiced on notice
to proceed.
B. 50% of total project price will be invoiced at
delivery.
C. 25% of total project price will be invoiced after
installation and training (if applicable).
9) Country of Origin (CoO) for all Class B fire training
systems: Canada
10) Meets Berry Amendment and BAA requirements.
In the event Customer is not ready for product to be
delivered on the confirmed delivery date, Customer
must notify Draeger, Inc. 30 days prior to confirmed
delivery date to reschedule. If Customer fails to
provide notification, Draeger, Inc. may invoice
Quotation no. Date of offer
136338092 I 02/26/2026
Please reference on inquiries
Payer
93095640
Unit price
USD
Total price
USD
24
Draper
Quotation
Customer no.
93095640
Page 6 / 6
Pos.
Quant.
Part no. Description
Customer for products and any additional costs to
hold product until Customer is ready for delivery.
Quotation no. Date of offer
136338092 I 02/26/2026
Please reference on inquiries
Payer
93095640
Unit price
USD
Total price
USD
25
DRAEGER, INC. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE (SAFETY)
1. GENERAL. These terms and conditions are integral to the agreement governing
the sale and purchase of goods ("Goods") and service ("Service") between the seller,
Draeger, Inc. ("Draeger"), and the purchaser ("Customer"). Goods and Service are
referred to herein collectively as "Product." The agreement governing this sale and
purchase of Product ("Agreement") consists of the following, all of which are hereby
incorporated herein by reference: (i) these terms and conditions, (ii) the written sale or
service agreement, if any, signed by Draeger and Customer (referred to herein singularly
as "Party" and collectively as the "Parties"), including schedules thereto, that is in effect
on the date the applicable Purchase Order ("PO") is delivered to Draeger, and any
amendments thereto ("Contract Document"), (iii) any price quote ("Quote"), and (iv) any
PO submitted by Customer with respect to a Quote; provided, however, Draeger shall not
be bound by any terms, conditions, or other provisions in a PO that are different from, in
addition to, or inconsistent with, the other provisions of this Agreement.
2. PRICES.
(a) Prices are as stated in the Contract Document. If no Contract Document is in
effect at the time the order is filled, the prices shall be as stated on the applicable Quote;
provided, that such Quote is valid at that time. In all other cases, prices are those currently
in effect on Draeger's standard price list at time of shipment. Unless otherwise stated in
writing by Draeger, prices include the cost of standard domestic packing. Prices exclude
charges for freight, unloading, storage, insurance, taxes, excises, fees, duties, or other
charges related to Product. Customer shall bear the cost of all applicable sales, use,
property, excise, and manufacturer's taxes and any duties, license, or similar fees, which
may be imposed upon the sale, use, or performance of the Product.
(b) If this Agreement is for multiple years, then the prices set forth herein are
fixed only for the first 12 months hereof. Thereafter, Draeger may adjust the prices ("Price
Adjustment"), pursuant to a proposed Price Adjustment notice ("Price Adjustment
Notice"). Draeger shall provide the Price Adjustment Notice to Customer, in writing,
specifying the adjustment, no less than 90 days in advance of a proposed Price
Adjustment ("Price Adjustment Notice Period"). If Customer objects to the proposed
Price Adjustment during the Price Adjustment Notice Period, then, notwithstanding
anything else in this Agreement to the contrary, Draeger may cancel this Agreement with
60 days' notice without penalty ("Price Termination Notice"). During the 60 -day Price
Termination Notice period, Customer may continue to purchase Products at the then -
current price. If Customer does not object to the proposed Price Adjustment, then such
proposed Price Adjustment shall go into effect on the date stated in the proposed Price
Adjustment Notice and shall be incorporated herein by reference. Draeger shall fill all
POs received prior to the effective date of the Price Adjustment or, if earlier, the
termination of this Agreement, at the then -current prices. Unless otherwise agreed to by
Draeger and Customer, all other terms, conditions, and provisions of this Agreement shall
continue unchanged and remain in full force and effect after any such Price Adjustment.
A Price Adjustment does not obligate any of the Parties to agree to any other modification
of this Agreement.
3. PAYMENT TERMS.
(a) Unless otherwise agreed in writing, Customer shall make payment in full
without any set-off (for any reason) no later than 30 days from the date of invoice in
United States Dollars ("USD"). Partial shipments of Goods shall be invoiced as shipped.
Draeger reserves the right to require (i) payment in advance, (ii) cash on delivery, or (iii)
a modification of credit terms.
(b) Notwithstanding the foregoing, payment on advance orders paid by credit
card shall be charged and paid for at that time of the order. All payments made with
personal credit cards may include an administrative fee of up to 2.8% of the value on the
invoice. Payments made through corporate purchasing credit cards may include an
administrative fee of up to 2.5% of the value on the invoice.
(c) Draeger reserves the right in the event of late payment: (i) to suspend all
deliveries or Service or to cancel any of its outstanding obligations under this Agreement;
or (ii) to charge interest on the late payment calculated on a day-to-day basis until the
actual date of payment at the lower of (A) an annual rate of 12% or (B) the maximum rate
allowed by law. Such remedies are in addition to any other rights or remedies available
to Draeger under the law.
(d) If Customer pays less than the full amount due, the payment will be applied
toward the outstanding balance. Draeger's acceptance of part of the amount due shall not
interfere with Draeger's right to recover the balance of the amount due or right to pursue
any other right or remedy under the law.
(e) All POs are subject to credit approval by Draeger.
4. DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, RISK, AND TITLE.
(a) Title to, and risk of loss for, the Goods shall pass to Customer upon delivery
as determined on the basis of FCA (INCOTERMS 2020) prepay and add all related
transportation and insurance costs as a separate line item to the invoice to Customer unless
Customer provides their own transportation provider and/or account number in which
case the delivery is determined on the basis of EXW (INCOTERMS 2020). Upon passage
of title of the Goods from Draeger to Customer or, if earlier, the date as of which Draeger
makes a commercially reasonable attempt to deliver Goods, Customer shall be
responsible and liable for, and agrees to defend and indemnify Draeger against, all claims,
injuries, losses fines, penalties, damages, or costs resulting from Customer's storage,
handling, disposal, release, use, or resale of the Goods or their containers.
(b) Delivery, installation, and completion dates are only approximate and
Draeger will not be liable for failure to meet such dates. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
1
Draeger shall use reasonable efforts to meet quoted delivery, installation, and completion
dates. Partial shipments may be made at Draeger's sole discretion or, with Draeger's
consent, at Customer's request.
(c) Unless stated otherwise in writing by Draeger, freight and transportation
costs, including standard ground transportation, packing, custom duties, and other similar
charges, shall be borne as follows: (i) for PO orders equal to or less than $15,000,
Customer shall bear all such costs, (ii) for PO orders greater than $15,000, Draeger shall
bear all such costs. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event Customer requests an
expedited order, Customer shall bear the additional costs.
(d) Customer shall use commercially reasonable efforts to allow for timely
delivery of Goods, including, without limitation, providing instructions, granting access
during Customer's business hours (or such other time agreed by the Parties), and
obtaining any required licenses or permits.
(e) Installation costs, if applicable, are included in the price of Goods, unless
indicated as a separate Service on the Contract Document or Quote.
Customer is responsible for ensuring that the installation site is fully prepared prior to
installation and for bearing all costs necessary to prepare site for installation in
accordance with Draeger's instructions, including, without limitation, (i) engaging in any
required labor, (ii) acquiring any required materials, (iii) to the extent applicable, ensuring
that the Customer's network (A) meets any Draeger specific requirements, and (B) is
fully functioning as mandated by all manuals and other instructions requested of
Customer by Draeger, and (iv) ensuring compliance with all governmental requirements,
including without limitation, all certifications and approvals for installation and
operation. Customer shall provide to Draeger or its subcontractor, as applicable, access
to the installation site and, if required, safe and secure space on site for storage of Goods
and equipment prior to and during installation.
5. ACCEPTANCE. Customer shall inspect Goods received and notify Draeger of
any Nonconforming Goods prior to acceptance. Goods shall be deemed to be accepted
by Customer 15 days from date of delivery; provided, however, that (i) if earlier,
acceptance shall occur immediately on the first day Customer uses Product, or (ii) with
respect to Goods requiring installation (other than connection to Customer network),
acceptance shall occur on the earlier of 5 days after installation or 30 days after delivery.
Installation shall be deemed to be completed upon final verification under Draeger's
standard procedures that Goods meet all applicable written performance obligations. For
this purpose, "Nonconforming Goods" means (i) Goods that are different from those
identified on the PO confirmation or (ii) Goods with label or packaging that incorrectly
identifies contents. Draeger shall, at its sole discretion, replace Nonconforming Goods
with conforming Goods or credit or refund the price of Nonconforming Goods. Such
remedy is the exclusive remedy for Nonconforming Goods. Draeger shall bear the
shipping costs related to return and replacement of Nonconforming Goods.
6. CHANGES AND RETURNS.
(a) POs may not be changed or canceled after PO is accepted by Draeger.
(b) Draeger reserves the right, subject to written notice, to substitute Goods or
change specifications of Goods, which, in Draeger's judgment, does not materially affect
the installation, performance, function, or price thereof Goods may only be returned
with prior authorization from Draeger. Eligible returns must follow the Customer
Material Return Process in effect at the time of return as specified at
https://www.draeger.com/Library/Content/RMA-Process-Safety-2023.pdf and which is
hereby incorporated herein by reference ("RMA Process"). Unless warranty applies or
in the case of a Nonconforming Good, restocking fees of up to 25% may apply.
7. DELAY OR FAILURE TO PERFORM OBLIGATIONS.
(a) Draeger shall not be deemed to be in breach or otherwise liable for any delay
or failure in performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement caused, in whole
or in part, by any act or omission of Customer or its agents, subcontractors, or employees.
(b) Neither Party shall be liable for failure to perform obligations (except for
payment obligations) under this Agreement to the extent that such failure arises out of
events beyond its reasonable control including, but not limited to, acts of government or
compliance with any governmental laws, rules or regulations, acts of God, war, terrorist
threats or acts, civil disturbance, fire, or other casualty, pandemic, strike, labor dispute,
or unavailability of labor, carriers, raw materials, power, or supplies. Any delivery date
may be extended, at Draeger's option, to the extent of any delay resulting from any such
event.
8. WARRANTY.
(a) Goods. Draeger warrants that under normal use and with prescribed
maintenance, storage, and care, Goods are free from defects in material and workmanship
for the warranty period. Except as provided in a separate warranty statement in Goods
manual or otherwise provided with Goods, the warranty period for new capital equipment
is 12 months from date of delivery and disposable and consumable Goods (excluding
sensors) are warranted at time of delivery only. All other Goods are warranted for 90
days from (i) date of delivery or (ii) in the case of software, date of implementation sign -
off, or first productive use. Warranty is conditioned on (i) Customer providing immediate
written notice of warranty -related claim to Draeger and following RMA Process, (ii) no
repairs, modifications, or alterations being made to Goods other than by Draeger or its
authorized representatives, (iii) Customer handling, using, storing, installing, operating,
cleaning, and maintaining Goods in compliance with the instructions and specifications
provided with Goods or incorporated into this Agreement, (iv) use of Goods only for the
use intended by Draeger, (v) defect not related to the attachment of Goods to non-Draeger
U.S. Terms and Conditions of Sale (Safety)
Effective — July 2023
4877-6831-8559, v. 4
26
supplied equipment or to Customer's network issues, (vi) Customer having fulfilled its
payment obligations for Goods, and (vii) an inspection by Draeger that reveals that
Customer's claim is valid under the terms of the warranty. Customer's remedy for a
breach of this warranty is limited to repair, replacement, credit, or refund, at the sole
option of Draeger. Repair or replacement may be with parts or product that are new,
used, or refurbished. Repairs or replacements shall not interrupt, extend, or prolong the
warranty period.
(b) Service. Draeger warrants that the Service shall be performed in a
professional manner in accordance with generally recognized industry standards for
similar service. Claims for breach of this Service warranty must be submitted to Draeger
in writing within 90 days of the completion of Service. Customer's remedy for breach of
Service warranty is limited to reperformance, credit, or refund, at the sole option of
Draeger.
(c) Third -Party Product. If this Agreement includes the sale of third -party
product not manufactured by Draeger or any of its affiliates, such products are provided
to Customer solely at the direction of Customer with no recommendation by Draeger.
Draeger makes no warranty for any third -party product. Customer's sole warranty for
any third -party product, if any, is the original manufacturer's warranty, which Draeger
agrees to pass on to Customer, as applicable. The obligation of Customer to pay Draeger
for the third -party product is absolute and unconditional, and Customer waives and
releases Draeger from all claims, damages, and losses arising out of such third -party
product regardless of any claims Customer may have regarding such third -party product.
(d) No Other Warranties. THE WARRANTIES IN THIS SECTION 9 ARE
THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE WARRANTIES MADE WITH RESPECT TO
PRODUCT. DRAEGER MAKES NO OTHER WARRANTY EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE,
THIRD -PARTY NONINFRINGEMENT, COURSE OF DEALING, AND USAGE
OF TRADE. DRAEGER DOES NOT WARRANT OR GUARANTEE THAT ANY
PRODUCT WILL BE SECURE FROM CYBER THREATS, HACKING, OR
SIMILARLY MALICIOUS ACTIVITY. DRAEGER DOES NOT WARRANT
ANY CUSTOMER OR THIRD -PARTY PROVIDED NETWORK OR THE
PERFORMANCE OF PRODUCT AS IMPACTED BY SUCH NETWORK
CONNECTION.
9. SERVICE BRIDGE SOLUTION. If Customer's use of Goods purchased is
likely to be interrupted or delayed for an extended period due to the need to service the
Goods, delay in delivery, or recall, upon Customer's request, Draeger may, to the extent
available, temporarily place reasonably comparable equipment with Customer for its use
until such time as the affected Goods are returned, repaired, or delivered, as applicable.
Such placement is part of Draeger's warranty, contracted Service, or recall obligations,
as applicable, and provided at no additional charge to Customer. Customer's option for
such temporary use of equipment shall mitigate any damages or losses, if any, that would
otherwise be incurred by Customer for such period.
10. INDEMNITY. To the extent permitted under applicable law, Draeger and
Customer (each as "Indemnitor") shall indemnify the other Party and its affiliates
(collectively "Indemnitee") from and against all third -party claims alleging bodily injury,
death, or damage to the third -party's tangible property, but only to the extent caused by
the Indemnitor's negligence or willful misconduct. No part of Customer's sites is
considered third -party property for purposes of this indemnity. Indemnitee shall provide
Indemnitor with prompt written notice of any third -party claims covered by this Section
10. Indemnitor has the unrestricted right to select and hire counsel and the exclusive right
to conduct the legal defense or settle the claim on the Indemnitee's behalf; subject to
Indemnitee's consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Indemnitor
shall not make any admissions that might be prejudicial to the Indemnitee.
11. INSURANCE. If during the term of this Agreement Draeger may need access to
Customer's premises to perform Service or for other reasons, Customer shall, at its own
expense, maintain and carry insurance in full force and effect which includes, but is not
limited to, commercial general liability in a sum no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence
and $5,000,000 in the aggregate with financially sound and reputable insurers. Upon
Draeger's request, Customer shall provide Draeger with a certificate of insurance from
Customer's insurer evidencing the insurance coverage specified in this Agreement and
which names Draeger as an additional insured. Customer shall provide Draeger with 30
days advance written notice in the event of a cancellation or material change in
Customer's insurance policy. Except where prohibited by law, Customer shall require its
insurer to waive all rights of subrogation against Draeger's insurers and Draeger.
12. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. IN NO EVENT SHALL ANY PARTY BE
LIABLE TO THE OTHER PARTY OR THEIR AFFILIATES, WHETHER IN
CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), STRICT LIABILITY,
INDEMNITY, OR ANY OTHER LEGAL THEORY, FOR LOST PROFITS OR
LOST STORED, TRANSMITTED, OR RECORDED DATA, OR FOR ANY
SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, OR EXEMPLARY
DAMAGES, EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY STATED IN THIS AGREEMENT, WITH
RESPECT TO ANY MATTERS RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT,
REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF
THE POSSIBILITY OF THE SAME. DRAEGER'S MAXIMUM LIABILITY
UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS THE ACTUAL PURCHASE PRICE RECEIVED
BY DRAEGER FOR THE PRODUCT THAT GIVES RISE TO THE CLAIM.
2
U.S. Terms and Conditions of Sale (Safety)
Effective — July 2023
4877-6831-8559, v. 4
13. PATENT, TRADEMARK, AND OTHER INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS. In the
event of any claim, suit, or proceeding brought against Customer alleging any Draeger
manufactured Good violates any patent, trademark, or copyright about which Customer
notifies Draeger in writing within 5 days after Customer becomes aware of the allegation,
Draeger shall, at its option and expense, (i) defend such claim, suit, or proceeding, (ii)
procure the Customer's right to use the Good, (iii) remove or modify the Good to avoid
infringement, or (iv) allow Customer to return the Good and refund the purchase price
paid to Customer less reasonable depreciation for Customer's use of the Good. In the
event of defense of such claim, suit, or proceeding, Customer shall give Draeger
information, assistance, and exclusive authority to fully control the defense and
settlement of such claim, suit or proceeding. This indemnity shall not apply if Customer
modifies or combines, operates, or uses the Good with any product, data, software,
apparatus, or program not provided by Draeger and Customer shall indemnify and hold
Draeger harmless against any liability or expense, including reasonable attorneys' fees,
incurred by Draeger in connection therewith.
14. RIGHTS IN SOFTWARE, DOCUMENTATION, AND INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY. To the extent software, data, or other documentation or information
(collectively, "Software") is embedded in or delivered with any Goods sold under this
Agreement, the sale of such Goods shall not constitute the transfer of the ownership rights
in such Software. The Software shall remain Draeger's property and Draeger grants to
Customer a non-exclusive, non -transferable license solely to use the Software for the
purpose, and in the manner, for which the Software was designed and produced.
Customer shall not modify, reverse engineer, or create derivative works based on any of
the Software, or permit any third party to do so. In addition, to the extent any third -party
software is included in the Software, Customer will comply with any third -party software
license terms provided by Draeger to Customer. Software that is provided separately to
Customer as a Product is not included under this Section 14, but is governed under a
separate license agreement, and may be subject to a licensing fee.
15. DATA PROTECTION. The Parties agree to comply with any privacy and data
protection laws, including without limitation the General Data Protection Regulation
(GDPR), to the extent relevant to the exchange of data between the Parties or storage or
exchange of data in connection with Product provided hereunder.
16. TERMINATION. In addition to any remedies that may be provided under these
terms and conditions, Draeger may terminate this Agreement or any part thereof with
immediate effect upon written notice to Customer, if Customer: (i) fails to pay any
amount when due under this Agreement and such failure continues for 30 days after
Customer's receipt of written notice of nonpayment; (ii) has not otherwise performed or
complied with any obligations of this Agreement, in whole or in part; (iii) becomes
insolvent, files a petition for bankruptcy or commences or has commenced against it
proceedings relating to bankruptcy, receivership, reorganization or assignment for the
benefit of creditors; or (iv) undergoes a change of control or ownership.
17. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. All non-public, confidential, or proprietary
information of Draeger disclosed by Draeger to Customer, whether disclosed orally or
disclosed or accessed in written, electronic, or other form or media, and whether or not
marked, designated, or otherwise identified as "confidential" in connection with this
Agreement is confidential, solely for the use of performing this Agreement and may not
be disclosed or copied unless authorized in advance by Draeger in writing. This Section
does not apply to information that is: (a) in the public domain; (b) known to Customer at
the time of disclosure without any confidentiality or restriction on use; or (c) rightfully
obtained by Customer on a non -confidential basis from a third -party.
18. OTHER TERMS.
(a) Compliance with Laws. The Parties shall comply with all applicable laws
and regulations, including, but not limited to, any laws and regulations relating to the
import, or export, of any Product or associated technical data.
(b) Benefit and Assignment. Neither Party may assign, subcontract, or delegate
any rights or obligations under this Agreement, without the prior written consent of the
other Party, unless otherwise stated in this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
Draeger may assign any of its rights and obligations under this Agreement to one of its
affiliates without notice to, or consent of, Customer. This Agreement shall inure to and
be binding on the Parties and their respective successors, permitted assigns, and legal
representatives. This Agreement is for the sole benefit of the Parties hereto and their
respective successors and permitted assigns and nothing herein, express or implied, is
intended to or shall confer upon any other person or entity any legal or equitable right,
benefit, or remedy of any nature whatsoever under or by reason of this Agreement.
(c) Modification. This Agreement may not be changed, modified, or amended,
except in writing signed by duly authorized representatives of the Parties.
(d) Governing Law, Venue, and Waiver of Jury Trial. This Agreement shall
be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, without giving effect to any conflict of law provisions. The Parties hereto
hereby agree that the application of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the
International Sale of Goods does not apply to this Agreement and is expressly excluded.
Any legal suit, action, or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be
brought before a court of competent of jurisdiction located in the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania. The Parties irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts
in any such suit, action, or proceeding. EACH PARTY WAIVES ALL RIGHTS TO
A TRIAL BY JURY IN CONNECTION WITH ANY DISPUTE ARISING UNDER
THIS AGREEMENT.
27
(e) Integration and Survival. This Agreement together with any attachments
or other documents incorporated by reference herein, constitute the entire agreement. The
terms of this Agreement that by their nature are intended to survive its expiration or
termination will continue in full force and effect after its expiration or termination.
(f) Severability; Headings. No provision of this Agreement, which may be
deemed unenforceable, will in any way invalidate any other portion or provision of this
Agreement. Section headings are for reference only and will have no substantive effect.
(g) Waiver. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement is effective
unless explicitly set forth in writing and signed by the Parties. No failure and no delay in
exercising, on the part of any Party, any right under this Agreement will operate as a
waiver thereof, nor will any single or partial exercise of any right preclude the further
exercise of any other right.
(h) Relationship of the Parties. The Parties are independent contractors.
Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as creating any agency,
partnership, joint venture, or other form of joint enterprise, employment, or fiduciary
relationship between the Parties, and neither Party shall have authority to contract for or
bind the other Party in any manner whatsoever.
(i) Injunction. Customer agrees that the remedies at law may be inadequate to
protect Draeger against any actual or threatened breach of Sections 14 or 17 of this
Agreement, and, without prejudice to any other rights and remedies otherwise available,
Draeger will be entitled to seek injunctive relief
(j) Limitation of Actions. Any action against Draeger arising out of this
Agreement shall be commenced within one year from the date such cause of action has
accrued, otherwise the same shall be barred.
(k) Notices.
Notices shall be in writing and shall be deemed served upon receipt and shall be delivered
in person or by nationally recognized courier or certified mail to Draeger, Inc. 3135
Quarry Road, Telford, PA 18969, Attention President with a copy to the same address to
the attention of General Counsel (such copy shall not constitute service of process).
End of Terms and Conditions of Sale (Safety)
3
U.S. Terms and Conditions of Sale (Safety)
Effective — July 2023
4877-6831-8559, v. 4
28
Architects C N H 7300 WEST 1471H STREET I SUITE 504 I APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 1952.431.4433
PROPOSAL FOR ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
PROJECT:
CNH No.:
CLIENT:
Shakopee Fire Station #2 Remodel
25012
City of Shakopee
ASA #01 — Expanded DD -CA Scope
February 24, 2026
Ms. Chelsea Peterson
Assistant City Administrator
City of Shakopee
Shakopee City Hall
485 Gorman Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
DESCRIPTION
This proposal expands the remodeling of the Shakopee Fire Station #2 based on the change in
project budget increasing from $598,000 to $1,189,000. This increase mostly is the result of
bringing forward the CIP budgets for reroofing flat roof and rooftop unit replacement. This
specifically includes the addition of two new rooftop units, a complete replacement of HVAC
ductwork in office & residence area, replacement of acoustical panel ceilings due to ductwork
replacement, replacement of the flat roof at the rooftop unit locations, structural support of new
rooftop units, and replacement of hot water heater. This represents an increase in project scope of
98.8% which was used in calculating the added fee for this work.
GENERAL
We propose to perform our additional services including the following services:
SERVICES PROVIDED
Design capacity loads for new rooftop units
Select rooftop unit models
Redesign ductwork based on new RTU units
Reroof flat roof at RTU with Garland system
Structural support of RTU based on new unit weights
Changes to floor drain scope
Expand extent of remodel area and revise multiple times
Rework APC ceiling grid
Construction documents for above
Specifications for above
Extend project schedule and add Owner meetings to meet expanded scope
YOUR SUCCESS IS OUR INSPIRATION. CNH ARCHITECTS 1
29
— Expand construction administration including shop drawings, RFI's, and site review
related to expanded scope
FEE
We propose the above additional services for an additional fixed fee of $42,643, plus reimbursable
expenses as indicated in our original contract.
This proposal fee is valid for 30 days from the date of this document.
AGREEMENT
Upon acceptance, this additional fee proposal becomes a part of the original Professional Service
Agreement dated October 1, 2025. All items are to remain as originally indicated except as modified
herein.
SCHEDULE
This work had been completed through the CD phase and is currently bidding. The remainder of the
construction administration phase will continue per schedule determined by the Construction Manager.
We appreciate working with you on this project and look forward to meeting these additional needs.
Sincerely,
Quinn S. Hutson, AIA, LEED AP
Principal
CNH Architects, Ltd. ACCEPTED BY:
Signature:
Name:
Title:
Date:
YOUR SUCCESS IS OUR INSPIRATION.
CNH ARCHITECTS 2
30
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.b
March 3, 2026
Scott County Public Health's Statewide Health Improvement
Partnership Grant Award
Andrea Harrell, Grants and Special Projects Coordinator
Chelsea Petersen, Assistant City Administrator
Action to be considered:
Adopt Resolution R2026-031, accepting Scott County Public Health's Statewide Health
Improvement Partnership (SHIP) grant award and authorizing the City Administrator to
execute the necessary contracts and agreements applicable to accept this award.
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
At its December 16, 2025 meeting, Council approved the application to the Scott County
Public Health's Statewide Health Improvement Partnership grant via Resolution R2025-
145. The SHIP grant is providing funding for two projects: a parent tent and equipment
for community -based events, and pickleball equipment for employee wellness. The
parent tent will be available for the public to utilize for a private space to nurse young
children, and the pickleball net and equipment will be available to employees to
encourage engagement in team -based physical activity during their break times.
Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution R2026-031.
Budget Impact:
A 10% match is required; however, it can be provided through an in -kind match of staff
time.
Attachments:
Resolution R2026-031 AWARD.docx
Resolution R2025-145.pdf
31
RESOLUTION R2026-031
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING
SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH'S STATEWIDE HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PARTNERSHIP (SHIP)
GRANT AWARD AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee applied to the Scott County Public Health's Statewide Health
Improvement Partnership (SHIP) grant, previously approved via Resolution R2025-145 on the 16th day of
December 2025, and
WHEREAS, the grant award is to provide funding for the purchase of a tent and equipment to
support parents during community events, and a pickleball net and equipment to encourage employee
exercise on breaks, and
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee was awarded the Scott County SHIP grant for $6,644, and
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee recognized that a 10% match was required, but can be provided
through an in -kind match of staff time.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: the City of Shakopee recognizes it has been awarded a grant by the Scott
County Public Health, agrees to accept the grant award and grant agreement for the above -referenced
project, and authorizes the City Administrator to execute the necessary contracts and agreements
applicable to accept this award. The City of Shakopee will comply with all applicable laws, requirements,
and regulations as stated in the grant agreement.
Adopted in the regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this
3rd day of March 2026.
Matt Lehman,
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
Richard Parsons
City Clerk
32
RESOLUTION R2025-145
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING
THE CITY TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH'S
STATEWIDE HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PARTNERSHIP GRANT
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee supports the application made to the Scott County Public
Health's Statewide Health Improvement Partnership (SHIP) grant, and
WHEREAS, the application is to obtain funding for the purchase of a tent and equipment to
support parents during community events and a pickleball net and equipment to encourage employee
exercise on breaks, and
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee recognizes a 10% match is required but can be provided via an
in -kind match of staff time.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: if the City of Shakopee is awarded a grant by Scott County Public Health, the
City of Shakopee agrees to accept the grant award and may enter into an agreement with Scott County
Public Health for the above -referenced project. The City of Shakopee will comply with all applicable
laws, requirements, and regulations as stated in the grant agreement.
Adopted in the regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this
16th day of December 2025.
Matt Lehman,
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
Richard Parsons
City Clerk
33
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.c
March 3, 2026
Award Low Bid Contract for Valley Crest Park improvements (PR25-002)
and Approve Installation of play equipment by Kompan and Purchase
of Shelter from Northland Recreation, both using the Sourcewell
Contract.
Bill Delaney, Senior Planner
Michael Kerski
Action to be considered:
Approve award of bids
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
Valley Crest was a Planned Unit Development (PUD) created in 2021 with the first homes
constructed in 2022. As part of the PUD, M&I Homes dedicated land for open space and
parks and paved the asphalt trail system.
The plan developed in cooperation with the surrounding residents will naturalize the
areas around the paved trails and create an active park area on the northernmost
section.
The play equipment was previously purchased from Kompan and is in storage at Public
Works.
Confluence is the project manager and publicly bid out the construction. Link Excavating
was the low bidder of 8 submitted bids.
Link Excavating Inc. $242,364.27
BKJ Land Co. $310,175.50
Sunram Construction Inc. $326,139.00
Fri edges Landscaping $332,364.89
Vada Contracting LLC $348,974.50
McLafferty Contracting Group $377,755.00
Blackstone Contractors $465,969.24
Urban Companies $510,707.00
34
The city has successfully worked with Link as they constructed Killarney Hills Park in
2025.
Link will also be installing the shelter structure. Kompan will be installing the playground
equipment and surfacing in the playground container.
Recommendation:
Award contract to Link Excavating as lowest bidder the construction of Valleycrest Park
improvements at $242,364.27 plus $24,000 in contingency and approve contracts using
the Sourcewell with Kompan for playground equipment installation for $98,571.86 and
purchase of shelter from Northland Recreation for $15,492.00.
Budget Impact:
Paid for out of Park Development Funds.
Attachments:
25145 ValleyCrest Bid Recommendation 2026-02-11.pdf
Sales_Proposal_SP162871 _1.pdf
Quote - Shakopee SSG 12x12MR.pdf
SSG-12X12.pdf
35
COflFLUEflCE
February 11, 2026
Bill Delaney, Senior Planner - Long Range and Parks
City of Shakopee
485 Gorman St.
Shakopee, MN 55369
bdelaney@ShakopeeMN.gov
RE: Valleycrest Park Improvements, 25145
Bid Award Recommendation
Dear Mr. Delaney:
Confluence has reviewed the bids for Valleycrest Pak Improvements received February 5th, 2026. The
scope of work generally includes the following:
Erosion control, tree planting, walkway construction, earthwork and rough grading,
installation of drainage and storm sewer utilities, concrete work, sod with irrigation,
installation of signage, prairie restoration, pollinator lawn seeding, site furnishings,
preparation for playground installation (by others), fine grading and restoration of site as
indicated in plans and specified in the project manual.
Eleven bids were received for all work. There were no alternate scopes of work.
We have reviewed all bid forms and the qualifications of the apparent low bidder. Based on our
review, we present the following summary and information for Council review and action.
A. SUGGESTED CONTRACT AWARD
a. Link Excavating Inc., 800 Stone Creek Drive Jordan, MN 55352
b. Bid Amount: ($242,364.72.00)
B. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
a. Sub -Contractors: Included sub -contractors have worked with City consultant staff on
past projects and include:
i. Curb Masters - Concrete
ii. Wellens Agronomics - Turf Establishment, erosion
iii. Aqua Engineering - Irrigation
iv. Freund Priority - Irrigation
v. Plehal -Asphalt
We recommend the Council approve proceeding with award of the base bid work and approve the
unit prices to be utilized as funds allow.
thinkconfluence.com
36
If you have any questions or would like additional information, please contact me at 612.237.5046 or
baldrich@thinkconfluence.com.
Sincerely,
Brad Aldrich, PLA, ASLA
Principal
Confluence
901 N 3rd Street, Suite 225
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
PROJECT NAME / 25000
Page 2 of 2
thinkconfluence.com
37
KOMPAN®
Let's play
City of Shakopee
Bill Delaney
485 Gorman St.
Shakopee, MN 55379
Project Name US3 18387 City of Shakopee- Valleycrest Park
No. Description
OMNIA
PARTNERS
Page 1 of 4
Sales Proposal
Quote No. 5P162871-1
Customer No. C130842
Document Date 01/19/2026
Expiration Date 03/20/2026
Sales Representative John Engfer
Email JohEng@Kompan.com
Qty Unit Unit Price Discount % Net Price
INSTALL SPECIAL
US -CUSTOM -
SURFACING
OMNIA Partners Contract #2017001135
Installation of KOMPAN Equipment
NRO-Custom (934198)
N RO409
GXY939
Surfacing
1 Pieces
Provide and Install 220 CY of EWF/Filter Fabric 4,996 Sq. Feet
82,413.79 5.00 78,293.10
4.51 10.00 20,278.76
KOMPAN, INC. 1605 W Howard Lane Ste 101 I Austin, TX 78753 I USA I Phone No. 1-800-426-9788
E -Mail Contact@KOMPAN.com I www.KOMPAN.us
SWIFT Code NDEAUS3N (Nordea Bank, NY I Bank Account No. USD 718 155 3001 I Routing No. 026010786)
38
KOMPAN®
Let's play
City of Shakopee
Bill Delaney
485 Gorman St.
Shakopee, MN 55379
Project Name US3 18387 City of Shakopee- Valleycrest Park
No. Description
OMNIA
PARTNERS
Page 2 of 4
Sales Proposal
Quote No. 5P162871-1
Customer No. C130842
Document Date 01/19/2026
Expiration Date 03/20/2026
Sales Representative John Engfer
Email JohEng@Kompan.com
Qty Unit Unit Price Discount % Net Price
Notes
Please read attached General Assumptions and
Exclusion document for information on
Install/Sitework.
Excludes sitework, products, & services not listed.
Assumes site to be accessible & install ready.
Business Agreement OMNIA Partners Contract
Payment Terms 50% Prepayment , 50% Net 30 days
Installation Site Address
City of Shakopee- Valleycrest park and trail
Matt Johnson (Installer)
1960 Sparrow Drive
Shakopee, MN 55379
Phone No. 651-633-4510
E -Mail matt@albrechtcompany.com
Description Retail Price Discount Net Price
Subtotal - Surfacing
Subtotal - Installation
22,531.96
82,413.79
2,253.20
4,120.69
20,278.76
78,293.10
Total USD 98,571.86
KOMPAN, INC. 1605 W Howard Lane Ste 101 I Austin, TX 78753 I USA I Phone No. 1-800-426-9788
E -Mail Contact@KOMPAN.com I www.KOMPAN.us
SWIFT Code NDEAUS3N (Nordea Bank, NY I Bank Account No. USD 718 155 3001 I Routing No. 026010786)
39
KOMPAN®
Let's play
City of Shakopee
Bill Delaney
485 Gorman St.
Shakopee, MN 55379
Project Name US3 18387 City of Shakopee- Valleycrest Park
OMNIA
PARTNERS
Sales Proposal
Quote No. 5P162871-1
Customer No. C130842
Document Date 01/19/2026
Expiration Date 03/20/2026
Sales Representative John Engfer
Email JohEng@Kompan.com
Page 3 of 4
Note that the color and texture of products and surfacing made with recycled content are subjected by the differences from the used recycled
raw materials. Therefore, minor differences in the appearance and texture can occur.
Applicable sales tax will be added unless a valid tax exemption certificate is provided. This amount is only an estimate of your tax liability.
Your acceptance of this proposal constitutes a valid order request and includes acceptance of terms and conditions contained within this
Master Agreement, which is hereby acknowledged.
Acceptance of this proposal from KOMPAN is acknowledged by issuance of an order confirmation by an authorized KOMPAN representative.
Prices in this quotation are good until expiration date, shown in the top of this document. After that date, this proposal may be withdrawn.
Prevailing Wage and Payment & Performance Bonds are not included unless stated in body of Sales Proposal. If Payment & Performance
Bonds are needed, add 2.2% of the entire sales proposal.
This information required for order placement:
Accepted By (Please Print):
Accepted By (Title):
Accepted By (signature):
Date:
Date Equipment needed on site:
Bill To: Ship To:
Address: Address:
City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip:
Contact: Contact:
Contact Email: Contact Email:
Contact Phone (Office): Contact Phone (Office):
Contact Phone (Cell):
SALES TAX EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE #:
(PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF CERTIFICATE)
KOMPAN, INC. 1605 W Howard Lane Ste 101 I Austin, TX 78753 I USA I Phone No. 1-800-426-9788
E -Mail Contact@KOMPAN.com I www.KOMPAN.us
SWIFT Code NDEAUS3N (Nordea Bank, NY I Bank Account No. USD 718 155 3001 I Routing No. 026010786)
40
QUOTATION
Phone: 651-815-4097
10085 Bridgewater Bay
Woodbury, MN 55129
Fax: 414-395-8538
Email: info@northlandrec.com
To: City of Shakopee
Project: SSG Sun Shelter with Gable Roof
SOURCEWELL PRICING
Date: 2/10/26
Contact: Bill Delaney
QTY ITEM
DESCRIPTION UNIT EXTENSION
Poligon SSG (Gable Roof) 12' x 12' MR
1 Shelter All Steel Frame
Multi -Rib Metal Roofing with Trim - 24 Gauge, Coated
2 Columns, 7.5' eave height
Does Not Include Benches or Table
Poli 5000 Paint System - Standard Color Chart Selection
Wind Speed 110 mph / Ground Snow Load 50Ib
Cast -In -Place Anchor Rods, Nuts and Template
Stamped Engineered Drawings
Shipping to Shakopee, MN
Color - Roof Patina Green and Frame Linen Tan
Anchor Bolt / Footing Design TBD
NOT Included This quote does NOT include installation of the shelter
Installation of concrete footings, concrete pad, building
permits, bonding costs, special inspections, site work, etc
Site preparation and restoration by others
* Quotation is valid for 30 Days
* Freight based - shipping to Shakopee
* Estimated ship date is TBD based upon engineered drawing approval
* Terms based on NET 30
* Orders will be placed upon receipt of Purchase Order made out to Northland Recreation or your signed acceptance.
Quote By: Sue Ayers THANK YOU !
Accepted By: Date:
$15,492.00
Sub Total $15,492.00
Freight Included
Tax - Exempt $0.00
TOTAL $15,492.00
41
10SS-888 (919) :1liOddflS 413IA d(103 E131i1Od Aq
000E-888 (919) :NIt/W
WOO'N00110d'MMMtl11O O
L-OSS
13(1OW ab0
l��HS 2AAO3
:JNIAAVeIG
OS: L
:31 VDS
:NOI1OOO1 1O3rOld
V
:13,1 AM
JDSN•SugD
l a Nmvaa
CU Z/SZ/Z
�31b'a 1NI�Jd
:1O3road
N1
V
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
BUILDING TYPE: SSG 12x12
MULTI -RIB
ROOF TYPE:
BUILDING NUMBER:
ORDER NUMBER:
QUOTE NUMBER:
DRAWING LIST:
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
COVER SHEET
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS
STRUCTURAL FRAMING PLAN
COLUMN LAYOUT
U
N
M
H
O
z
W
z
iii
w
H
H
m
w
0
Z
O
DO WO (n
F� Ow ~ Fg
U W ET, z2 W
OQ N≤ cn¢� Mm-
J ❑W LEU Ho -co
WO w
Z= ¢¢ UJg OT=
OF O2 Z¢(AF Z5I—
w0 ¢W ��¢z oow
~ 4,1i� �ZWO Vc14) mw}O
¢„ w2,i0w—WDC� m
v0 wo iclWw ITO1
ghWoz wwli0 woCwW O� w O—
Et
zQ: o z�m ¢z��OW t Og ! QUw
• Q gT. JCL-= J~J
www0-J �� JU¢
cC
0Cww 0OzO w�WZ Owj
OO¢ w
=W�'? mW0 z¢¢J zQZ
Cho Qw~ onO
=F- o�W
�wm mlwocn— O m www
ZF- oOcc) WZZ¢0 wZz:
C1_WmWpg �QJ O.zw O�Om (0000 U) w�z�
�¢ (0000) (0OOO1 (0(0W
W ¢¢O OWOX OW=DC
¢QO Eg LH,°A W�CHW
O
(A W '(14
W J
O mz• zw
• :::
�Www Wj>HQ w<ZwZZ OZ
EOLya
Z(0-
0OQU
�1 WZO W W
CnZQ lag
HWIL
�Q2�m ��H��pwC UFw
TOzJU =¢W1OJ 000(0
ELLT;1°T
F-CLW(0 L166 -
(2,F W w F u)
O J= Fg,)sp-
„olig9
D a
W J ~
���
wO��Q WQwF
~ OQs. zJ m�W !!!
mmZO W¢=1 0
=CL cwIW(nwzZ OF-W~w0Do=02O WF-QH OOui ZQZ>W>=o(/) WD��Z OUF
JJZF-U(n JCOF-W= =¢U
ZZQHHO Z(n—W2H H
cnZZ
O
O
z
}
U
Z0
mm
W
OU
Uo
Wo
w W
Hm
W �
= Z_ J
Uo
z
j0 m
OU a
m
O▪ O O
9▪ 0 U
• ES
gC
z
O
F
0
(n
O
ow
W
¢
Mff
oW
w
w OO�
U- wad
W J W ¢ � ¢
HOWO�W
tO- U
W� W
0W0=F-=DO
: 0 F- O
HCn=JC!)(0
O
w•
HL W
� J
Og
N o �z
wZ
NZ
0 �a
z
42
GENERAL ROOF NOTES:
p O
,pO
<W -r.
Ozw0
wO-U�
C5uj oQO
ZOJLULT_D
Q ><O
0,,`><00
OOJz—
w
~ ▪ w
0
W
0
0
0
v
1
N
U
M O
,u
• O)
•
�0 3
3
0
byPORTERcoRP
43
LL; N
N
Z
O O
Z
U c.a
a
. z-
-• I- C V)
H *2
z j O J
Og �QO
(" O oz
LL N z
O a
J
z
byPORTERcoRP
44
BASEPLATE NOTES:
POLIGON ENGINEERING WILL DETERMINE REQUIRED BASEPLATE
DESIGN AFTER ENGINEERING PACKAGE IS ORDERED.
CUSTOMER MAY SUGGEST PREFERRED BASEPLATE DESIGN.
Z
O O
z
U �a
Q
• = Z?
-• I- C V)
H C W
z j a J
Og
�QO
(" O oz
LL N z
O
z
c� o
,o u
� c
- O
el. co
C •o
3
0
>-
z
QJ J �
OQr
byPORTERcoRP
45
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.d
March 3, 2026
Award a Contract for the Old Carriage Court Corridor Improvements
Project and Accept a Proposal from Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc. for
Construction Services
Micah Heckman, Assistant City Engineer
Alex Jordan, City Engineer
Action to be considered:
Adopt Resolution R2026-027, accepting bids and awarding a contract in the amount of
$2,489,066.82 to Northwest Asphalt, Inc., and accept a proposal in the amount of
$321,225.00 from Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc. to perform construction services for
the Old Carriage Court Corridor Improvements Project, CIF -26-004.
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
The City's adopted 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) contains the Old Carriage
Court Corridor Improvements Project (CIF -26-004). On January 20, 2026, the City Council
adopted Resolution R2026-014 approving plans and specifications, and authorizing
bidding for the project.
In accordance with Minnesota Statute Section 471.345 Uniform Municipal Contracting
Law, bids were solicited and opened February 19, 2026. Four bids were received and
Northwest Asphalt, Inc. from Shakopee, Minnesota, was the low bidder in the amount of
$2,489,066.82 (see attached resolution for the bid tabulation summary).
Northwest Asphalt, Inc. has the capacity and experience for the project and is deemed a
responsible bidder. Construction is anticipated to begin in July 2026 and be completed fall
of 2026.
Kimley Horn's proposal identifies the scope of services and estimated cost to provide
construction services for the improvements. Kimley Horn has the experience, technical
skill and capacity to provide the needed services and is a recommended firm as part of
the City's approved consultant pool. The attached proposal authorizes and describes the
scope and fee for their needed work on this project.
47
Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution R2026-027 and accept the proposal.
Budget Impact:
The scope of Kimley Horn's construction services proposal is based on a not to exceed
cost of $321,225.00. This work is budgeted in the 2026-2030 CIP.
Based on the low bid amount, the total estimated project cost is as follows:
CIP
Estimate Based On Bid
Award
COSTS
Construction Cost (bid
contract)
$ 2,864,000.00
$ 2,489,066.82
Schedule Incentive
$ 0.00
$ 60,000.00
Streetlighting ng
$ 0.00
$ 150,000.00
Land Acquisition
$ 50,000.00
$ 50,000.00
Contingency
$ 286,000.00
$ 124,453.34
Subtotal
$ 3,200,000.00
$ 2,873,520.16
Engineering, Legal,
Administration
$ 605,000.00
$ 706,035.00
Total Estimated Project
Cost
$ 3,805,000.00
$ 3,579,555.16
FUNDING
Capital Improvement Fund
$ 0.00
$ 159,857.15
State Aid
$ 3,305,000.00
$ 2,879,368.36
Storm Drainage Fund
$ 200,000.00
$ 240,329.65
Developer Contributions 1
$ 300,000.00
$ 300,000.00
Total Funding
$ 3,805,000.00
$ 3,579,555.16
The total project budget of $3,579,555.16 is under the CIP budget by 6 percent and
includes a contingency amount that covers any unexpected change orders, quantity
adjustments and other miscellaneous expenses encountered as part of the project.
Consistent with the CIP, this project is proposed to be funded by the Capital Improvement
Fund, State Aid, Storm Drainage Fund and Developer Contributions.
48
Attachments:
R2026-027
Proposal - Kimley Horn
CIF -26-004
Contract
49
RESOLUTION R2026-027
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,489,066.82
TO NORTHWEST ASPHALT, INC., FOR THE OLD CARRIAGE COURT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT CIF -26-004
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Old Carriage Court Improvements
Project CIF -26-004 bids were received, opened on February 19, 2026, and tabulated according to law,
and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Bidder
NORTHWEST ASPHALT, INC.
EUREKA CONSTRUCTION, INC.
VALLEY PAVING, INC.
S.M. HENTGES & SONS, INC.
Amount
$ 2,489,066.82
$ 2,508,101.40
$ 2,520,775.21
$ 2,549,293.45
WHEREAS, Northwest Asphalt, Inc., 1451 Stagecoach Road, Shakopee, MN 55379, is the lowest
responsible bidder for the Old Carriage Court Improvements Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS:
1. The appropriate City officials are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract
with Northwest Asphalt, Inc., in the name of the City of Shakopee for the Old Carriage
Court Improvements Project according to the plans and specifications therefore
approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the
next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
3. Pursuant to Section 1.150-2(d) of the Treasury Regulations, the City Council declares its
official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvements from the proceeds of
tax-exempt bonds.
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 3rd
day of March 2026.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Prepared by:
City of Shakopee
485 Gorman Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
50
Kirn1ey> Horn
February 19th, 2026
Mr. Alex Jordan
City Engineer, City of Shakopee
485 Gorman Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
Re: Amendment Number 2 to Professional Services Agreement
Dear Mr. Jordan:
Page 1
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ("Kimley-Horn" or "Consultant") and the City of Shakopee ("Client")
entered in a Professional Services Agreement dated January 28th, 2025 ("Agreement") concerning Old
Carriage Road and Old Carriage Court Improvements ("Project").
The parties now desire to amend the Agreement to include additional coordination work with Xcel
Energy for roundabout lighting and construction phase services to be performed by Consultant for
compensation as set forth below in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, which are incorporated
by reference.
Consultant will provide the construction phase services specifically set forth below.
SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Task 1.1 — General Project Management
Kimley-Horn will provide overall project management and utilize internal project management tools to
monitor budgets, staff roles, and responsibilities for our scope of work. We will communicate project
updates directly with the City's project manager. Kimley-Horn will prepare monthly billing invoices per
the City's progress form and provide a summary of the work tasks completed at the end of each
month upon request. Our original scope of work for this task did not extend beyond bidding services
and we have assumed general project management scope of services will be required through
October 2026 and the completion of construction.
TASK 7: FINAL DESIGN
Task 7.5 — Utility Coordination
Due to the presence of existing overhead Xcel transmission lines in the vicinity of the proposed Old
Carriage Court and Old Carriage Road roundabout, additional coordination and preparation of a
exception memo was required to permit the proposed roundabout lighting. We prepared materials for
and hosted one (1) additional coordination meeting with Xcel Energy transmission staff and also
prepared the requested exception memo for approval by Xcel.
kimley-horn.com
14800 Galaxie Avenue, Suite 200, Apple Valley, MN 55124
651 645 4197
51
Kirn1ey> Horn
TASK 12: CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
Page 2
Task 12.1 — Construction Administration
We will attend and conduct a pre -construction meeting with the contractor, sub-contractor(s), and City
staff and produce meeting minutes. We will attend and conduct weekly construction meetings to
discuss project schedule and other pertinent items to construction.
We have assumed up to nineteen (19) weekly meetings will be held (June 2026 — October 2026). We
anticipate these weekly construction meetings will be held via conference call and at the project site.
We will prepare meetings notes from each weekly meeting and provide them to City staff for the
project record.
We will review shop drawings for the project submitted by the contractor. We will also coordinate any
necessary shop drawing revisions with the contractor and the City. We have assumed the following
shop drawings will be submitted for the project:
• Storm Sewer Structures
• Bituminous Mix Designs
• Concrete Mix Design
• Other Material Gradations
• Traffic Control Plan Details
• Signing Details
• Traffic Signal Designs
We will provide construction coordination assistance to City staff and our on -site construction
observer. We have assumed this task will include assisting our on -site observer with design
questions, coordinating with City and Contractor staff on any RFIs or project items, and assisting with
monthly pay applications. We have assumed approximately two (2) hours of effort per week for the
assumed nineteen (19) weeks of construction activity will be necessary for construction coordination.
We have assumed up to five (5) monthly/final payment applications will be prepared to reach closeout
of the project.
Kimley-Horn will prepare necessary change orders for the project. We have assumed the preparation
of up to two (2) change orders may be necessary. We will assist the City with coordination of the
change order documentation with the Contractor.
Task 12.2 — Construction Observation
We will provide one construction observer for the duration of the construction project in 2026. We
have assumed the project will span a nineteen (19) week construction schedule starting in June and
kimley-horn.com
14800 Galaxie Avenue, Suite 200, Apple Valley, MN 55124
651 645 4197
52
Kirn1ey> Horn
Page 3
being completed by October 31, 2026. The construction observer duties will consist of the following
tasks:
• Provide construction observation on all roadway, storm, and utility improvements
• Daily reports
• Photographs before, during, and after construction
• Project materials testing documentation and logging
• Construction observation for evaluation that construction is in conformance with the
Plans and City standards/specifications
• Regular coordination with the project contractor and City staff
• Coordination with Kimley-Horn's design engineer on any design related inquiries
• Complete IRA logs for all quantities on a daily basis
• Attend weekly meetings
We estimate it will require 50 hours per week on average from a construction observer during up to
nineteen (19) weeks of construction activity. However, we do anticipate the on -site observation time
will vary week to week and over the duration of the project based on the scope of work being
completed on -site during that week. All construction observation time will be logged in the daily
reports for documentation and coordination with City staff.
We have also assumed up to twenty (20) on -site hours will be necessary by the construction observer
to coordinate with private utilities ahead of major construction activities occurring.
Kimley-Horn shall use the care and skill a reasonable practitioner in the profession would use in the
same or similar circumstances. Kimley-Horn shall have no responsibility for any of the construction
contractor's means, methods, and techniques, equipment choice and usage, sequence, schedule,
safety programs, or safety practices, nor shall Kimley-Horn have any authority or responsibility to stop
or direct the construction work. Kimley-Horn's visits to the project site will be for the purpose of
endeavoring to provide the City a greater degree of confidence that the completed work will generally
conform to the construction documents. Kimley-Horn neither guarantees the performance of the
construction contractor, nor assumes responsibility for the construction contractor's failure to perform
its work in accordance with the contract documents. The construction contractor is solely responsible
for constructing the project in conformity to the designs and specifications.
Task 12.3 — Materials Testing
A Kimley-Horn subconsultant, Braun Intertec, will provide construction materials testing services for
the proposed project improvements. Construction materials testing will be provided consistent with
the MnDOT State Aid Schedule of Materials Control. Test results will be issued weekly for review
and summarized in a final report at the end of the project. Materials testing will be limited to the
following:
kimley-horn.com
14800 Galaxie Avenue, Suite 200, Apple Valley, MN 55124
651 645 4197
53
Kirn1ey> Horn
Soils Related Testing
Page 4
• Perform nuclear gauge density tests on sub -grade, embankment, select granular
embankment, and utility backfill materials.
• Perform Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) tests on aggregate base material.
• Perform moisture content tests at time of compaction on backfill, sub -grade, embankment,
select granular embankment, and aggregate base materials.
• Perform gradation tests on select granular borrow and aggregate base materials.
• Perform laboratory standard Proctor tests on backfill and fill materials.
• Prepare the preliminary and final grading and base report along with assembling the random
sampling locations report for the aggregate base according to MnDOT Specifications.
Perform MnDOT dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) tests on aggregate base material.
Concrete Related Testing
• Sample and test the plastic concrete for slump, air content, temperature prior to placement.
• Prepare 4 -inch by 8 -inch cylinders for compressive strength testing. A set of three cylinders
will be tested at 28 days for each set cast.
• Laboratory compressive strength testing of cylinders.
Bituminous Related Services
• Collect verification samples per MnDOT's 2360 specification and randomly select one sample
per day per mix to run quality assurance tests on. Perform quality assurance tests on the
verification samples which include the following tests: Rice specific gravity, asphalt content,
extracted aggregate gradation, gyratory density, coarse aggregate angularity, and fine
aggregate angularity. Compare agency test results with contractor's test results for
compliance with MnDOT 2360 specification.
• Randomly determine bituminous core locations by using MnDOT's random core worksheet
and mark pavement core locations.
• Observe the contractor coring and core testing in accordance with MnDOT 2360
specification, which include watching quality control personnel weigh the cores at their
laboratory.
• Collect companion cores and test for thickness and density of pavement cores. Compare
agency test results with contractor's test results for compliance with MnDOT 2360
specification.
Task 12.4 — Construction Staking
A Kimley-Horn subconsultant, I & S Group. Inc., will provide construction staking services for the
proposed project improvements. Up to one (1) set of stakes will be provided for the following:
kimley-horn.com
14800 Galaxie Avenue, Suite 200, Apple Valley, MN 55124
651 645 4197
54
Kirn1ey> Horn
• Roadway curb and gutter, concrete edge, and Bituminous edge staking
• Storm sewer at all structures and pipeline offsets at 50 -foot intervals
• ADA ramp, sidewalks, and pedestrian features
• Roadway subgrade and aggregate base blue -tops
• Lighting and traffic signal
• Removals staking
Page 5
The on -site construction observer will coordinate staking requests with the Contractor and surveyor.
A minimum of 48 -hours notice for staking requests is assumed to be provided.
Task 12.5 — Project Closeout
We will prepare a punch list following substantial completion of the project for review and completion
by the Contractor. We have assumed punch list preparation will include one (1) walkthrough of the
entire project with the on -site construction observer, project engineer, and other necessary City
representatives.
A Kimley-Horn sub -consultant, I & S Group Inc., will attain as -built topographic survey information on
all storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain improvements with the project. The as -built survey
information will be provided to the City for preparation of record drawings. The City will prepare
record drawings.
Task 12.6 — Construction Engagement
We have assumed engagement activities during construction will be limited to weekly updates on
construction progress and detour maps posted to the project website and shared via the City's
listserv. We have assumed preparing a weekly update for the assumed nineteen (19) weeks of
construction and also updates on up three (3) detour maps will be necessary during construction for
posting to the City's website.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Kimley-Horn will provide the scope of services identified above on an hourly basis. Our total
estimated cost for the Scope of Services is summarized in the table below.
Task 1 — Project Management
Task 7 — Final Design
Task 12 — Construction Phase Services
$ 4,590
$ 4,070
$301,465
Subtotal
Reimbursable Expenses
Total
$310,125
$ 11,100
$321,225
We propose to complete the services on an hourly basis with a not -to -exceed cost of $321,225
including all labor and reimbursable expenses. A detailed breakdown of hours and fees per task is
kimley-horn.com
14800 Galaxie Avenue, Suite 200, Apple Valley, MN 55124
651 645 4197
55
Kimley>) Horn
Page 6
attached. Labor fee will be billed according to our current standard hourly rate schedule. Fees and
times stated in this Proposal are valid for 120 days after the date of this letter. We appreciate the
opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to working with you on this project. Please feel
free to contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Luke Moren, P.E.
Project Manager
AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
By:
Title:
Date:
AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
By:
Title:
Date:
Enclosures: Attachment 1 — Detailed Fee Spreadsheet
Eric Fdsmo, P.E.
Vice President/Authorized Signer
kimley-horn.com
14800 Galaxie Avenue, Suite 200, Apple Valley, MN 55124
651 645 4197
56
N.
AMENDMEMT NO. 2 DETAILED ESTIMATED COST SUMMARY - ATTACHMENT 1
c
a)
E
a)
O
L
0.
E
L
0
0
a)
0)
CU
.L
L
CU
0
V
0
V
C
CU
V
CU
0
W
CD
0)
CO
.L
L
CU
0
V
0
z
C
G
6
a)
0.
O
CO
Cl)C
v
V
z
ui
4
V
0
co
co
4
G
z
4
z
ce
0
>-
w
J
2
R
m
D
W
re
a
w
ce
a
TOTAL
HOURS
1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1.1 General Project Management 18 $4,590 18
SUBTOTAL 18 0 0 0 0 0 $4,590 18
7. FINAL DESIGN
7.5 Utility Coordination 2 8 12 $4,070 22
SUBTOTAL 2 8 12 0 0 0 $4,070 22
12. CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
C) C
r
0
N.
C)
r
M
M
M
000
12.6 Construction Engagement 4 4 12 $3,440 20
SUBTOTAL 6 94 108 1062 345 308 $301,465 1923
TOTAL 26 102 120 1062 345 308 $310,125 1963
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES $11,100
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TOTAL $321,225 1963
TOTAL
COST
$34,770
Co
UD
O
O
CO
r
te
$43,220
$45,370
L[)
r
CD
4
r
fO-
MATERIALS TESTING
SUB -CONSULTANT
00
0
M
STAKING SUB -
CONSULTANT
0
M
M
L()
CONSTRUCTION
OBSERVER
O�
ON.
C)
O�
DESIGN
ENGINEER
000
N
DESIGN
LEAD
O
00
00
PROJECT
MANAGER
N
in
J
F-
F-
12.1 Construction Administration
12.2 Construction Observation
12.3 Materials Testing
12.4 Construction Staking
12.5 Project Closeout
2026 thru 2030
Project Details
Shakopee, MN
Project #
Project Name
CIF -26-004
Old Carriage Ct & Old Carriage Rd Roundabout
Total Project Cost $3,805,000
Department Capital Improvements Fund
Category Street Construction
Status Active
Accounting Code 5975/6975
Contact City Engineer
Type Improvement
Priority 1 - Have to do
Useful Life 30 years
Fund Capital Improvement Fund
Description
Corridor improvements to address safety and operational issues along Old Carriage Court, including intersection improvements at Old Carriage Road and the Wal-
Mart Drive access to accommodate redevelopment.
Cost sharing with Chick-fil-a is included in the project funding for the traffic signal at the Old Carriage Ct/Wal-Mart Drive access. The traffic signal would only be
implemented if redevelopment proceeds on the Best Buy property.
Justification
Improvements to the corridor are to address roadway safety and operational issues. The City completed a corridor study in 2024 to identify the recommended
improvements.
Prior
355,000
Expenditures
Construction/Maintenance
Engineering/Administration
Land Acquisition & ROW
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
3,150,000 0 0 0 0
250,000 0 0 0 0
50,000 0 0 0 0
Tota I
Prior Funding Sources
3,450,000 0 0 0 0
Total
3,150,000
250,000
50,000
3,450,000
355,000
MSA - State Aid
Contributions/Donations
Storm Drainage Fund
Tota I
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
2,950,000
300,000
200,000
3,450,000
Total
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
2,950,000
300,000
200,000
3,450,000
Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software
54
58
2026 thru 2030
Project Details
Shakopee, MN
Project #
Project Name
CIF -26-004
Old Carriage Ct & Old Carriage Rd Roundabout
Contact
Department
City Engineer
Capital Improvements Fund
PROJECT LOCATION
55
Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software
59
NOTICE OF AWARD
FOR
OLD CARRIAGE COURT CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. CIF -26-004
SAP 166-142-001, SAP 166-143-001
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
TO:
The City of Shakopee, Minnesota, having considered the proposals submitted on February 19, 2026 for the
construction of the OLD CARRIAGE COURT CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT CIF -26-
004, and it appearing that your proposal is fair, equitable and to the best interest of the City, the said proposal
is hereby accepted for the prices set forth therein.
In accordance with the terms of the Contract Documents, you are required to execute the formal Contract
Agreement and furnish the required Performance and Payment Bond within ten (10) days from the date hereof.
The Bid Security submitted with your proposal will be returned upon execution of the Contract Agreement and
the furnishing of the Performance and Payment Bond. In the event you should fail to execute the Contract
Agreement and furnish the Performance and Payment Bond, within the time limit specified, said Bid Security
will be retained by the City of Shakopee as liquidated damages for failure to accept the award and execute the
necessary documents for the formation of the contract.
The City is accepting Alternate n/a No. n/a
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
Bill Reynolds/ City Administrator
Awarded by:
Shakopee City Council March 3, 2026
Contract Amount: $2,489,066.82
Old Carriage Court Corridor Improvements
Project No. CIF -26-004, SAP 166-142-001, SAP 166-143-001
Project Specifications
Contract
C-1 60
CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into this 3rd day of March , 2026 by and
between Northwest Asphalt, Inc.
hereinafter called "Contractor" (a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota) (a partnership consisting of
created under the laws of Minnesota), and the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "City."
WITNESSETH:
That Whereas, the Contractor has become the lowest responsible bidder for furnishing the supervision, labor,
tools, equipment, materials and supplies and for constructing the following City improvements:
OLD CARRIAGE COURT CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
NOW THEREFORE,
the parties to this contract agree to the following:
1. Manner for Completion
The Contractor, at his own proper cost and expense, shall perform all work and furnish all supervision
(needed beyond that provided by the City Engineer), labor, material, tools, supplies, machinery and other
equipment necessary for the construction of the Old Carriage Court Corridor Improvements, Project
CIF -26-004 for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, in a workmanlike and substantial manner, as outlined in
the Plans and Specifications.
2. Due Diligence
Time is of the essence in the performance of this Contract. The maintenance of a rate of progress in the
work which will result in its completion in a reasonable time, is an essential feature of this Contract, and the
Contractor agrees to proceed with all due diligence and care, at all times to take all precautions to insure the
time of completion as defined in this Contract. The Contractor shall fully complete the work called for under
the Contract in accordance with the specifications.
3. Payment
The City will pay the Contractor those prices stipulated in the Contractor's Contract Proposal, which are
incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Contract, which shall constitute full and complete
compensation for the contractor's work provided hereunder. The parties specifically agree and understand
and the Contractor specifically waives any claim for additional compensation for any changed condition
whether arising out of a physical condition at the site of an unusual nature, differing materially from those
ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character and at the location
provided for in the Contract or arising as a result of any force majeur.
4. Prevailing Wages
If this project is funded in whole or in part by state funds, then the wages of laborers, workers, and mechanics
should be comparable to wages paid for similar work in the community as a whole, as established by the
Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry. If this section applies to this project, the prevailing wage rates
are attached and included in the contract documents.
Old Carriage Court Corridor Improvements
Project No. CIF -26-004, SAP 166-142-001, SAP 166-143-001
Project Specifications
Contract
C-2 61
5. Contractor's Responsibility for Subcontractors
It is further agreed that Contractor shall be as fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of its
subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as Contractor is for the acts and
omissions of persons it directly employs. Contractor shall cause appropriate provisions to be inserted in all
subcontracts relating to this work, to bind all subcontractors to Contractor by all the terms herein set forth,
insofar as applicable to the work of subcontractors and to give Contractor the same power regarding
termination of any subcontract as the City may exercise over Contractor under any provisions of this contract.
Nothing contained in this Contract shall create any contractual relation between the subcontractor and the
City or between any subcontractors.
6. Payment to Subcontractors
The Contractor shall pay any subcontractor within ten days of receipt of payment from the City for undisputed
services provided by the subcontractor. If the Contractor fails to pay within ten days, the Contractor shall pay
the subcontractor interest at the rate of one and one-half percent per month or part of month to the subcontractor
on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor, in accordance with Minn. State. Sec. 471.425,
Subd. 4a.
7. City Instructions
The City may declare the contract forfeited as described in the Standard Specifications should the Contractor
persistently disregard instructions of the City or fail to observe or perform any provisions of this Contract.
8. Indemnity
The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, and save the City harmless from and against all claims, suits and
actions of every description, brought against the City and from all damage and costs, including attorney's and
expert fees, by reason or on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person or persons,
or their property, by Contractor, its servants, agents or subcontractors in the construction of said work, or by
any negligence or carelessness in the performance of same, or on account of any other wrongful act or omission,
including breach of any provision of this Contract, of Contractor, its independent subcontractors, agents,
employees, or delegates. The Contractor further agrees to indemnify the City for defense cost incurred in
defending any claims, unless the City is determined to be at fault.
9. Contract Documents
This Contract, together with the other documents enumerated in this paragraph, forms the Contract between
the parties. These documents are as fully a part of the contract as if attached hereto or repeated herein. In the
event of any conflict between those documents listed as (a) through (f), they shall govern in the order listed,
with this Contract governing over all other documents. The contract documents consist of the following:
a. This Contract
b. All Change Orders or Addenda
c. Plans and Specifications for Project CIF -26-004
d. General Utility and Street Improvement Specifications for Construction
e. Shakopee Public Utility Commission Water Policy Manual
f. All items listed under the Table of Contents
10. Duplicate Originals
This Contract shall be executed in two copies; one (1) copy being retained by the City, one (1) to be delivered
to the Contractor.
Old Carriage Court Corridor Improvements
Project No. CIF -26-004, SAP 166-142-001, SAP 166-143-001
Project Specifications
Contract
C-1 62
11. Nondiscrimination
The Contractor agrees in the performance of this Contract not to discriminate on the ground or because of race,
color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability,
sexual orientation or age, against any employee of Contractor or applicant for employment, and shall include a
similar provision in all subcontracts let or awarded hereunder.
12. Jurisdiction
This agreement and every question arising hereunder shall be construed or determined according to the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
CONTRACTOR CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
By By
Mayor/Matt Lehman
By By
Name / Title City Administrator/Bill Reynolds
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
Old Carriage Court Corridor Improvements
Project No. CIF -26-004, SAP 166-142-001, SAP 166-143-001
Project Specifications
Contract
C-2 63
PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that We,
, as
Principal, and
as Surety, being a corporation certified by the Minnesota Commissioner of Insurance and authorized to act as
a surety as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 60A.23, Subd. 5 and 574.15, are held and firmly bound
unto the City of Shakopee, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter called the City, for the use of the
City and to all subcontractors and persons who have furnished or shall furnish materials actually used in the
performance of the hereinafter mentioned Contract, or who have performed, or shall perform, labor in the
performance of or in connection with the said Contract in the penal sum of
($ ), lawful money of the United States of America, the payment of which will truly be
made to the Obligees, the said Principals and the said surety, bind themselves and each of their heirs, exe-
cutors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents as follows:
The condition of the above obligation is such that:
WHEREAS, the above bounded Principals have heretofore on the day of , 2026, entered
into a written Contract, a copy of which is by reference made a part hereof, with said City, for the furnishing
of all labor and equipment for the complete installation of the Old Carriage Court Corridor
Improvements, Project CIF -26-004, said construction work to be done according to the requirements of
said Contract.
NOW, THEREFORE,
the obligations shall remain in full force and effect unless and until the above Principals do the following:
• At all times duly, promptly, and faithfully perform said Contract and any alteration in or addition to the
obligations of said Principals arising thereunder (including the matter of infringement, if any, of patents),
• Guarantee all work against defective workmanship and materials for a period of two (2) years from date
of final acceptance by the City,
• Comply with all the covenants contained in the specification drawings and other documents constituting
a part of said Contract required to be performed by said Principals,
• Satisfy all claims and demands for same, in the manner and within the times provided in said Contract,
• Fully indemnify and save harmless the City of Shakopee from all costs and damage which the City may
suffer,
• Fully reimburse and repay the City all outlay and expenses which the City may incur in making good any
defaults, and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in the prosecution of or defense of any action arising out
of or in connection with any such default,
• Pay all people who have contracts directly with the Principals, for labor or materials, if any, included in
said Contract, or any alteration in or addition thereto.
Old Carriage Court Corridor Improvements
Project No. CIF -26-004, SAP 166-142-001, SAP 166-143-001
Project Specifications
Contract
C-3 64
If the Principals fulfill the above -listed items, then this obligation may become null and void.
The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration in or
addition to the terms of the Contract, the work to be performed thereunder, or specifications accompanying
the same, and no forbearance on the part of either the City or the Principal, shall in any way affect its
obligation in this bond or release the Principal and Surety or either of them, their heirs, executors,
administrators, successors or assigns from their liability hereunder. The Surety hereby waives notice of any
such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract, the work to be performed
thereunder, or the specifications, or any forbearance.
Signed and sealed this day of , 2026.
Principal
By
Surety
Address
By
Attorney -in -fact
Local Agent
Address
Old Carriage Court Corridor Improvements
Project No. CIF -26-004, SAP 166-142-001, SAP 166-143-001
Project Specifications
Contract
C-4 65
NOTICE TO PROCEED
FOR
OLD CARRIAGE COURT CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. CIF -26-004
SAP 166-142-001, SAP 166-143-001
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
TO: DATE:
You are hereby authorized to proceed on this date for the construction of the Old Carriage Court Corridor
Improvements, Project CIF -26-004 for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota as set forth in detail in the Contract
Documents, including Plans and Specifications.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
By:
City Engineer
We have determined the following permits are required:
If you will not complete your work involving these permits within the time specified thereon, you should
communicate with the Director of Public Works, City of Shakopee, Minnesota to see if an extension is available
and what you must do to obtain one. If you encounter other permits required, please communicate immediately
with the same department.
Old Carriage Court Corridor Improvements
Project No. CIF -26-004, SAP 166-142-001, SAP 166-143-001
Project Specifications
Contract
C-5 66
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.e
March 3, 2026
Accept a Feasibility Report for the L16 Dual Forcemain Improvements.
Alex Jordan, City Engineer
Action to be considered:
Adopt Resolution R2026-028, accepting a feasibility report for the L16 Dual Forcemain
Improvements.
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
The adopted 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) programs construction of a
redundant (dual) forcemain that carries wastewater from the L16 Lift Station to the city's
gravity sewer network. Construction of the improvements is programmed to be
completed in 2029. Prior to advancing with engineering design, the City completed a
feasibility study to identify the scope of the project, including the preferred forcemain
route and estimated project costs.
The L16 Lift station and existing 16" forcemain discharges wastewater to a gravity sewer
that conveys wastewater to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services' (MCES) Blue
Lake Water Reclamation Facility. Approximately 30% of the city's wastewater flows
through L16 and its forcemain. Considering the critical value of this asset, the City
evaluated the addition of a secondary forcemain to provide additional capacity and
redundancy for maintenance and operation.
The feasibility study analyzed several alternative routes and construction methods to
construct this secondary forcemain. Significant challenges exist along each of the
alternative routes, including:
• Cultural Resources
• Shallow bedrock
• Existing utilities (city and private)
• Environmental
• Railroad
• County Highway impacts
• Property impacts and acquisition
67
The study evaluated the costs, risks and above factors for construction of this secondary
system. Based on the evaluation criteria, the study recommends the following:
• Construction of a secondary forcemain serving L16 is necessary within the 5 years
• The forcemain should follow Alternative B2 using an open trench method
• Cured -in -Place Pipe (CIPP) line the existing 16" forcemain segment that was not
reconstructed in the 1990s.
• Continue maintenance and evaluation of valves on the existing forcemain and
replace as necessary
The Alternative B2 alignment follows the south side of Country Road 101 from Marschall
Road (CH 17) to Shenandoah Drive, then south along the west side of Shenandoah Drive
connecting to the existing gravity sewer system at 4th Avenue. The other alignments
studied include the north side of County Road 101 and along 4th Avenue. Additionally,
the study reviewed the costs of directional boring the pipe in lieu of open trenching.
The total estimated project cost of Alternative B2 is $3.1 million, which includes a
contingency and project delivery costs. These costs will be programmed in the upcoming
2027-2031 Capital Improvement Plan to ensure adequate funding can be allocated for the
recommended improvements.
Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution R2026-028, accepting the feasibility report.
Budget Impact:
None.
Attachments:
20260105 L16 Forcemain Feasibility_Final for Approval.pdf
Resolution R2026-028.docx
68
/LIFT STATION 16
TKDA
ALTERNATE A
ALTERNATE
ALTERNATE B2-' \
I ' ALTERNATE
T. L•• ••?• • •
4111 AVE E
_
Feasibility Report
L16 DUAL FORCEMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
Shakopee, Minnesota
TKDA Project No. 21396.001
January 5, 2026
69
70
L16 Dual Forcemain Improvements
Feasibility Report
Shakopee, Minnesota
TKDA Project No. 21396.001
January 5, 2026
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision,
and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
Fo p
Larry Poppler, PE
Project Manager
Date: January 5, 2026 Lic. No.: 41005
TKDA
3311 East Old Shakopee Road Suite 300
Bloomington, MN 55425
TKDA
71
72
Executive Summary
The City of Shakopee owns Lift Station 16 (L16) and the 16" forcemain that discharges
wastewater to a gravity sewer that conveys wastewater to the Metropolitan Council
Environmental Services' (MCES) Blue Lake Water Reclamation Facility. Approximately 30%
of city wastewater flows through L16 and its forcemain. As critical sanitary sewer
infrastructure ages, cities must be prepared for the replacement of their facilities to keep
wastewater flow moving downstream. A Feasibility Report prepared by AE2S in October of
2020 recommended adding a secondary forcemain as an improvement to L16, identifying it
as a part of the anticipated 10 -year CIP. Considering the critical value of this asset, the City is
evaluating the forcemain and considering adding a second forcemain pipe to provide
additional capacity and redundancy for maintenance and operation.
This feasibility report studies the existing forcemain system serving L16 and provides options
for constructing a secondary forcemain system that serves L16. Significant challenges exist
along the various alternative routes, including the following:
• Cultural resources
• Shallow bedrock
• Existing utilities
• Environmental
• Railroad
• County Highway
• Property impacts
This feasibility study evaluates the costs, risks, and other tradeoffs for construction of a
secondary forcemain system. The feasibility study also reviewed improvements for the
existing forcemain system.
Based on these costs, risks, and tradeoffs, this feasibility study recommends the following:
1. Construct a secondary forcemain serving Lift Station 16.
2. Construction of Alternate B2 using an open trench method.
3. Ongoing cultural resource review during construction.
4. Once Alternate B2 is complete, CIPP line the existing 16" forcemain segment that
was not reconstructed in the 1990s. This could be performed as a separate project or
as a part of the dual forcemain work.
5. Continued maintenance and evaluation of valves on the existing forcemain system.
Replace as necessary.
Constructing Alternate B2 has a total estimated cost of $3.1 million, which includes a 15%
contingency and other construction expenses. Project funding is expected to come from
sanitary sewer funds and the City's general fund. Regardless of the chosen alternate, it is
recommended that ongoing cultural resources work take place as the project moves from
feasibility to planning and construction stages. Compliance with state law will require
archaeological reconnaissance survey, consultation with the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux
Community (and other Minnesota Dakota Communities), the Minnesota Indian Affairs Council
(MIAC), Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), and Office of the State
L16 Dual Forcemain Feasibility Report TKDA Project No. 21396.001
Shakopee, Minnesota Summary Page 1
73
Executive Summary (Continued)
Archaeologist (OSA). Continued dialogue with involved agencies and stakeholders, including
consultation and feedback regarding proposed route options should guide the next steps of
the process.
All alternative route options have challenges and tradeoffs. Alternatively if the City does not
choose to move forward with construction of an alternative within 5 years of this report, it is
recommended that the City complete a project to CI PP line the existing forcemain at the "mill
pond" crossing at a cost estimated at $148,000 and keep up with maintenance and
replacement of forcemain system components at all structures and manholes. However, any
maintenance on the existing forcemain will require the expense of bypass pumping if the dual
forcemain is not installed.
L16 Dual Forcemain Feasibility Report TKDA Project No. 21396.001
Shakopee, Minnesota Summary Page 2
74
75
Table of Contents
Certification Page
Summary
Table of Contents
Page
1.0 Background 1
2.0 Introduction 1
3.0 Existing Conditions and Corridor Constraints 2
3.1 General Site Overview 2
3.2 Existing Forcemain Details and History 2
3.3 County Road 101 Bridge Crossing 3
3.4 Railroad Crossing 3
3.5 Cultural Resources 4
4.0 Existing Forcemain Condition Assessment and Recommendations 4
4.1 General Pipe and Structure Condition 4
5.0 Dual Forcemain Preliminary Alignment Review 6
5.1 Project Area / Alternatives 6
5.2 Cultural Review of Alternative Alignments 7
5.3 Railroad Permitting 8
5.4 Constructability Review 9
6.0 Cost Estimates 12
6.1 Existing System Estimate 12
6.2 Dual Forcemain Alternatives Estimates 12
7.0 Evaluation of Alternatives 13
7.1 Options Screening 13
7.2 Risk Register 13
7.3 Options Scoring 13
8.0 Conclusion and Recommendations 14
List of Tables
Table 1 Alternatives Estimates 13
Table 2 Options Scoring 13
List of Appendices
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Appendix F
Appendix G
Project Layouts
Cost Estimate
Risk Register
Option Screening Table
Phase 1a Cultural Resources Assessment
AE2S Lift Station L16 Feasibility Report
Shakopee Emergency Action Plan
L16 Dual Forcemain Feasibility Report TKDA Project No. 21396.001
Shakopee, Minnesota
76
Feasibility Report
L16 DUAL FORCEMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
Prepared for Shakopee, Minnesota
1.0 Background
The City of Shakopee owns Lift Station 16 (L16) and the 16" forcemain that discharges
wastewater to a gravity sewer that conveys wastewater to the Metropolitan Council
Environmental Services' (MCES) Blue Lake Water Reclamation Facility. These facilities are
located in Township 115 North, Range 22 West, Sections 4, 5, and 6.
Approximately 320 million gallons per year, representing 30% of Shakopee's total
wastewater, flow through L16 and its forcemain. Considering the high volume of flow to L16,
a failure of the existing forcemain system could result in discharge of wastewater to
environmentally sensitive areas, backup of sewage, and high costs for emergency response.
Considering the critical value of this asset, the City is evaluating the forcemain pipe and
considering adding a second forcemain pipe to provide additional capacity and redundancy
for maintenance and operation. This feasibility report explores options, risks, and costs for
adding a second forcemain pipe serving L16.
2.0 Introduction
Lift Station 16 was constructed in the
1970s and reconstructed in the late
1990s by MCES. Ownership of the lift
station and associated forcemain was
transferred to the City of Shakopee in
2009.
The existing 16" forcemain was
originally constructed in the 1970s
and begins at L16 and travels along
the north side of County Road 101,
crossing under the highway and
railroad tracks, connecting to gravity
sewer. Portions of this forcemain were
rehabilitated in the mid -1990s.
A critical portion of forcemain that
crosses under the "mill pond" area at the County Road 101 bridge was not rehabilitated.
Figure 1: Lift Station 16
A Feasibility Report prepared by AE2S in October of 2020 recommended adding a secondary
forcemain as an improvement to L16, identifying it as a part of the anticipated 10 -year CIP.
The City rehabilitated the lift station in 2022, as identified in the feasibility report. That project
added a bypass system, SCADA improvements, provided new pumps, and rehabilitated the
wet well for additional emergency storage.
L16 Dual Forcemain Feasibility Report TKDA Project No. 21396.001
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 1
77
As critical sanitary sewer infrastructure ages, cities must be prepared for the replacement of
their facilities to keep wastewater flow moving downstream. The amount of flow which is
being pumped through this forcemain is significant, representing 30% of the City's
wastewater effluent. It is important that this forcemain be monitored and options reviewed for
future replacement or construction of a dual pipe serving L16.
The feasibility report reviews the existing forcemain and explores secondary forcemain
options. There are a number of challenges and considerations for work in this area. These
include: cultural resources, bedrock, railroad, county roadway, environmental areas, and
utilities. The report explores existing conditions and corridor constraints, reviews the existing
forcemain condition, develops alternatives for a secondary forcemain serving L16, reviews
costs, evaluates options and risks. At the conclusion of the report, recommendations are
provided.
3.0 Existing Conditions and Corridor Constraints
3.1 General Site Overview
The feasibility study area extends
from the existing Lift Station 16
Marschall Road (County Road 17)
on the west to the connection with
the existing MCES gravity sanitary
interceptor along County Road 101.
The northern and southern limits of
the study area include 4th Ave East
on the south and the northern right
of way limit of County Road 101.
The north side of the project abuts
Shakopee Memorial Park and the
Landing Heritage Site.
Figure 2: Memorial Park and Trail above existing
3.2 Existing Forcemain Details and History
The existing forcemain route follows along the north side of County Road 101 and crosses
the "Mill Pond" approximately 1000 feet east of Marschall Road at Bridge No. 5944. The
existing forcemain crosses under CR 101 and Union Pacific Railroad right of way east of a
new warehouse (Amazon) facility.
-LIFT STATION 16
AREA OF STUDY
4TH AVE E
Figure 3: Area of Study
1,1
1
Lia
•
CONNECTION TO EXISTING SEWER
I
The existing forcemain was originally constructed in the 1970s and then reconstructed as part
of two projects in 1993 and 1995. It consists of 16" diameter PVC pipe and some epoxy lined
ductile iron pipe. The existing forcemain route includes 8 manhole structures.
L16 Dual Forcemain Feasibility Report
Shakopee, Minnesota
TKDA Project No. 21396.001
Page 2
78
These structures were built in strategic locations to provide for forcemain pipe bends and
include air release valves and gate valves that can isolate wastewater flow.
The forcemain discharges into a 36" gravity interceptor sewer that flows east to the MCES
Blue Lake Water Reclamation Facility. The interceptor pipe was constructed in 1981.
v y
il•.;
-LIFT STATION 16
COUNTY ROAD 101
Figure 4: Existing Forcemain Route
3.3 County Road 101 Bridge
Crossing
At the "Mill Pond" area, County
Road 101 crosses over the
pond, low area, and trail via
Bridge No. 5944. The forcemain
pipe crosses below the pond at
approximately elevation 704, 7-8
feet below the pond elevation.
This pipe elevation is 25-30 feet
below the bridge deck.
3.4 Railroad Crossing
The existing forcemain crosses
under the Union Pacific
Railroad track near the gravity
sewer connection. This connection is
located north of 3253 4th Ave South. The
Union Pacific right of way is 100' wide.
CONNECTION TO EXISTING SEWER
•
Figure 5: Conditions above existing Mill Pond crossing
The railroad crossing includes the 16"
PVC pipe located within a 36" steel casing
pipe. The crossing length is 55 feet. The
existing 16" PVC pipe discharges into a
manhole just south the Union Pacific right
of way. It is assumed that a permit or
agreement was in place for this pipe
crossing. Having a copy of this permit or
agreement should help with the
application for another crossing.
Considering the age and transfer of ownership from MCES, an official agreement may not be
available.
Figure 6: Highway and Rail Crossing Location
L16 Dual Forcemain Feasibility Report TKDA Project No. 21396.001
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 3
79
3.5 Cultural Resources
The feasibility study area is located within an area shown to be rich in cultural resource
artifacts. Blondo Consulting, LLC (Blondo Consulting), was retained by TKDA to complete a
Phase 1a Cultural Resources Assessment for the proposed L16 Forcemain in Shakopee,
Scott County, Minnesota.
Since the current status of the project is a feasibility study, it is not subject to agency review,
however; as the project moves to planning and construction phases, work will be subject to
review under the Field Archaeology Act (Minn. Stat. § 138.31-138.42) and the Private
Cemeteries Act (Minn. Stat. § 307).
The study area included multiple optional routes. As the project moves into planning and
construction phases, an APE (Area of Potential Effect) will need to be defined. Typically, the
APE is identified as the area where ground disturbing activities may occur.
Background research was completed through an online request for State Historical
Preservation Office (SHPO) files and through their online portal. Research results indicated
the identification of 25 archaeological sites within a one -mile radius of the study area. An
additional 20 historic resources have been recorded within one mile of the study area.
Numerous cultural resources surveys have been completed within the study area, most
focusing on mound groups north of Highway 101.
See Full Phase 1a Cultural Resources Assessment in Appendix E.
4.0 Existing Forcemain Condition Assessment and Recommendations
4.1 General Pipe and Structure Condition
Pipe condition is difficult to assess.
without excavation or televising the
pipe. Public Works staff have noted
a few concerns with the existing
forcemain. Concerns include rust
within valve manholes and poor
valve operation for specific valves.
Overall, public works is performing
routine maintenance on the
forcemain system, and it is working
well. Televising the existing pipe
could be performed to evaluate the
inside condition of the pipe, but it
. t
would involve taking the existing
forcemain out of service.
Considering the volume of
wastewater conveyed, L16 and the forcemain pipe can't be taken out of service without
providing either a temporary or permanent system to convey the flow during the televising
and inspection. However, the expected lifespan of PVC pipe is 75 years. Since the PVC pipe
was installed in 1996, the remaining lifespan of the existing pipe is estimated to be
approximately 46 years. PVC is not subject to corrosion.
Figure 7: Valve vault near Lift Station. Some corrosion
on pipe.
A portion of the forcemain pipe crossing under Bridge #5944 in the "Mill Pond" area was not
reconstructed in the mid -1990s and was constructed in the 1970s. It is recommended that
this pipe be lined with "Cured In Place Pipe" (CIPP).
L16 Dual Forcemain Feasibility Report TKDA Project No. 21396.001
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 4
80
Valves are regularly maintained, and no significant breaks have been reported. In structures
where pipe is exposed, the fittings show some corrosion. At some point, these structures and
valves would require replacement.
In 2014, four manholes were rehabilitated with new valves. In 2024 a failing air release valve
was replaced. The costs for this work was approximately 20% higher due to bypass pumping.
Having a dual forcemain available would have eliminated the additional cost.
The Lift Station Feasibility Report by AE2S in October 2020 recommended, upon completion
of the new forcemain, to perform a more detailed inspection of the existing forcemain and
replace the valves.
The City has an Emergency Operations Plan for L16 prepared by AE2S in March of 2025.
The plan includes discussion of a rupture of the existing forcemain and steps to handle such
an event. Considering the pipe materials at the mill pond crossing, a rupture at this location is
the most likely area to rupture. A rupture at this location is also the most difficult to address
and would involve a temporary bypass system.
If an emergency repair were needed, one possibility could be to CIPP line this pipe once the
temporary bypass system is set up. The existing manhole structures on either side of the mill
pond crossing would be used to access the pipe for lining. Therefore, the bypass would need
to utilize other downstream and upstream manholes or structures. The temporary bypass
would involve connecting the temporary conveyance pipe to the pipe within the existing
manholes and utilizing the existing lift station pump to convey the wastewater flow through
the bypass pipe. No temporary pipe would be required in this case. The temporary
conveyance pipe would be placed along County Road 101 and over the bridge. A lane
closure would be needed and concrete barricades would be placed to protect the temporary
conveyance pipe along County Road 101. Lining costs for this section are complicated due to
the vertical bends in the forcemain system at the bridge. Lining at the vertical bends can
725
mum ommtimimiiiimmilimm
mil �•umioni mum me =vim=
mu aii =mu um w I is
m 1 ■cMMINII
II IS MN "Ii AftijidmiNiimi -.1.1 i ll 1 1 Milla illig:
- I. ■
um 'i mk s ImiilI it ill imii 1 .— !h...-egil ha ingil1 ...= i 11 mim ..iim
'11 Li Mil MEM". illA IMIUMin illalbilMilli W..IIIIIIIIMPI...
i�I -1R MVAN I=1MI WA iMOM 1:IlMil III Eitims illi=, =I mit ......L _
Mil um; n L rw!AMMIll
rig rmi wN L I1
1U kil NM= INEWAIMX==
MIENR rm.
VOL IA.'a4.3ti'
MEEl FA =174 Mill En rrliraMEM
NM MEM MIIIIIV 1. MEM
-EMENIM I
IIII NI MI M.
720
710
705
700
17+00
Figure 8: Force main profile at Mill Pond Crossing
create folds in the liner at these bends during the lining process. These folds would then need
to be cut out of the pipe with a robotic cutting machine. For the purposes of this report, lining
for this complicated segment of pipe is assumed to be $350 per linear foot ($700 per linear
foot in an emergency situation due to advancing liner fabrication and scheduling).
L16 Dual Forcemain Feasibility Report
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 5
TKDA Project No. 21396.001
81
Based on these assumptions, an emergency repair could cost upwards of $246,000
(Emergency lining $196,000 and bypass pumping $50,000). It may be prudent to initiate a
lining project in advance of a rupture at an estimated cost of $148,000 (Lining $98,000,
bypass pumping $50,000).
5.0 Dual Forcemain Preliminary Alignment Review
5.1 Project Area / Alternatives
This feasibility study reviewed multiple routes to connect a secondary forcemain serving L16
and connecting to the existing gravity sewer interceptor. Criteria in evaluating the alternatives
include impacts to cultural resources, constructability, and cost.
7LIFT STATION 16
4,4tAt
ALTERNATE A
/ALTERNATE C2
11 IL
tr
Figure 9: Route Alternatives
~ALTERNATE B
,♦ ♦ s;�fi^r
Q�
ALTERNATE 62 '♦ d�,�
ALTERNATE C-7'4,1
4TH AVE E
111
No Action — The do-nothing alternative is an option; however, eventually the existing
forcemain will require maintenance or replacement. There is also a risk that if the existing
forcemain pipe fails, there will be significant impacts to customers within the service area,
discharge to the "Mill Pond" area, or disturbance of cultural artifacts. Wastewater backups to
customer properties could occur. The emergency response in that scenario would be difficult
and costly.
Considering the existing right of way, three alternative routes were reviewed as part of the
feasibility study. Two additional sub -options were also reviewed. See below and Appendix A
for maps showing project alternatives.
Alternate A places a new forcemain pipe generally parallel to the existing forcemain and
would be located south of the existing forcemain. It would be generally located between the
existing forcemain and CR 101. A new crossing will be necessary across the Mill Pond in
close proximity to the existing forcemain. This option has the highest potential for inadvertent
cultural resource disturbance, and the highest potential for encountering bedrock, but the
lowest potential for utility impacts.
Alternate B places a new forcemain pipe which crosses to the south side of County Road 101
and is generally located between the edge of CR 101 and the Union Pacific Railroad track.
The new forcemain would cross under the rail track near the existing forcemain and connect
at the same manhole. The location of the CR 101 crossing can be shifted as necessary to
reduce conflicts with utilities or other constraints. The crossing at the Mill Pond is on the
south side of CR 101, which has more open space and good separation from the existing
forcemain.
L16 Dual Forcemain Feasibility Report TKDA Project No. 21396.001
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 6
82
Alternate B2 follows Alternate B but turns the alignment south along Shenandoah Drive and
makes a connection to the existing gravity sewer at 4th Ave East and Shenandoah Drive. This
option reduces the length in the County right of way and reduces the overall option length by
around 1600 LF. This option connects to the existing 24" City sanitary sewer pipe. The City
has determined that this pipe has the capacity to accept the L16 forcemain flow.
Alternate C places a new forcemain alignment on Marschall Road (County Road 17) from
L16 to 4th Avenue, the forcemain follows 4th Avenue S to the east, where it connects to the
existing gravity interceptor at 4th Ave and Shenandoah Drive. This route is likely to have less
bedrock excavation and less risk of inadvertent cultural resource impacts, but has a very high
potential for public and private utility impacts.
Alternate C2 utilizes an existing Utility Easement East of Marshall Road. To access this
easement, the property currently owned by the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community
(SMSC) would need to be used, requiring coordination and agreement. The Existing Utility
Easement contains gas, communications, and sanitary sewer, so coordination would be
required to find a suitable location for the forcemain. Access to the utility easement would
also be more challenging than Alternative C.
5.2 Cultural Review of Alternative Alignments
Alternate A has the highest potential for archaeological impacts and has less support from
Native American stakeholders. Alternate A has a significantly higher risk of encountering
cultural materials. If this were to happen, it would disturb the burials held in high regard by the
SMSC and a wider American history. In addition, encountering these materials would start an
inadvertent discovery plan (to be developed). Typical plans include negotiations and recovery
methods that could delay the project.
Alternate B is a better compromise between archaeological concerns and efficient
construction. It provides a less complicated route compared to Alternate C along with a lower
potential to impact the Pond and Steele Mound groups (21 SC0022 and 21 SC0024) than
Alternate A. However, even though the known mounds and mound remnants are north of
Highway 101, the potential for cultural materials within Alternate B remains and there is still a
possibility of project delays.
Alternate C, in conjunction with Alternate B2, is the most favorable from an archaeological
standpoint as it appears to be the least likely to impact cultural resources, especially
regarding the Pond Mound Group (21 SC0022). However, Alternate C would still cross
through the Steele Mound Group (21 SC0024) meaning it has a slight advantage over
Alternate B. Furthermore, this is based on the known archaeological sites and may be subject
to change once additional archaeological survey has been completed.
Finally, the use of Alternate C2 is not recommended as it cuts through the middle of the
Shakopee Village and Mound group (21SC0002).
Ongoing cultural resources work is recommended as the project moves from feasibility to
planning and construction stages. Compliance with state law will require archaeological
reconnaissance survey, consultation with the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community
(and other Minnesota Dakota Communities), the Minnesota Indian Affairs Council (MIAC), the
Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), and the Office of the State
Archaeologist (OSA). Continued dialogue with involved agencies and stakeholders, including
consultation and feedback regarding proposed route options, should guide the next steps of
the process. Specific next steps are detailed in the Recommendations and Conclusions
section at the end of this report.
L16 Dual Forcemain Feasibility Report TKDA Project No. 21396.001
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 7
83
5.3 Scott County Permitting
Permitting will be needed with Scott County for any work within the County Road 101 right of
way. For this project, a standard utility permit would be needed. Scott County has an online
permitting system. Permit processing is typically 2 weeks, and no permit fees would be
charged. Any crossing of County Road 101 would require a casing pipe, and the space
between the carrier pipe and the casing pipe would be filled with sand. Any crossing should
be perpendicular to County Road 101.
5.4 Railroad Permitting
In order to construct a new forcemain pipe, all alignment options require crossing the Union
Pacific railroad track. Union Pacific has an application process for new crossings. An
application fee of $2,055 is required at the time of application. Crossing applications take a
minimum of 45-60 days to process. To apply, the City must have the following information:
1. Applicant Contact Information
2. Construction Contact Information
3. Pipe Crossing Information (type of crossing, type of commodity, angle of crossing,
size, depth, materials)
4. Latitude / Longitude of Crossing Location
5. Fixed Location based on UP stationing (Search tool available)
6. Documents / Maps
7. Payment
For more information or to apply for the permit, navigate to the Union Pacific Website:
https://www.up.com/real-estate/tempuse/procedures
Rail Crossings — Boring under Union Pacific track must be a minimum of 60 inches below
base of rail. Wet bores are not permitted on Union Pacific property. Steel casing pipe is
required with the carrier pipe inside the casing. The ends of steel casing need to be a
minimum of 30 feet from the centerline of the track when measured at a right angle to the
track. Also, bore pits must be a minimum of 30 feet from the centerline of the track when
measured at a right angle to the track. In addition, no bore pits can be located in the slope of
a cut or fill section of the roadbed. The bore pit size must be kept to a minimum. Manholes
must be capable of withstanding H-20 highway loading requirements and must be installed so
as not to create a stumbling hazard.
Parallel Pipelines — Union Pacific provides guidance that any parallel pipelines must be at
least 50 feet from the roadway centerline and must be outside of the 1 to 1 grades for
supporting the rail line. The space between the railroad track and CR 101 is generally 80 feet
wide.
L16 Dual Forcemain Feasibility Report TKDA Project No. 21396.001
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 8
84
FT. TO R.O.I. - FT. TO R.0.11.
5O' -Q' IIN.
CLEARANCE TO UTILITY LINES
ee'•
Wf
35'-0' Aw4. 6'-0' 35'-O' 1144.
CLEARANCE TO UTILITY LINES TRK. CENTERS; Q.EARAMCE To UTLITY LINES
NATURAL
GROUND
LINE
t
r
EXCAYATCN
MUST BE OUTSOE
PROJECTED
SLOPE LINE.
1AAINSLINE PROF3SED
TRACK SECOND
TRACK
PARALLEL ENCROACHMENTS
FOR UTILITY LINES
SCAL i
NOTES.
I. IT MILL NOT BE PERNSSIBLE TO ATTACH UTLITY LINES
HANDLING GAS OR FLUIDS TO BROGES. COMMLINICATK)N
LINES AMY BE ATTACHED WITH Tit ATTACtIivIENT TO THE
BRIDGE STRUCTURE APPROVED ON A PER BRIDGE BASIS.
2. ALL P ELIAES SHALL BE BURIED A MINIMUM or 5 FEET
BELOW NATURAL GROUND.
Figure 10: Union Pacific Utility Standards
5.5 Constructability Review
Forcemain construction will include placement of new PVC forcemain pipe approximately 6'
deep and construction of approximately eight manhole structures for bends, gate valves, air
release valves, and cleanouts along the route.
Other than cultural resource challenges and railroad permitting, several other significant
challenges exist in constructing a secondary forcemain serving L16. The severity of these
challenges varies depending on the route. These challenges include:
• Bedrock
• Mill Pond Crossing
• Utilities
• Environmental Impacts
• Proximity to Existing Forcemain
Bedrock — Historical soil boring data was reviewed for the study area and shows that shallow
bedrock exists below the surface across most of the project area. It can be expected that
construction would encounter dolomite stone, which is a bedrock type that is denser than
other forms of bedrock. In some places, the bedrock is only 2' below the surface. Any new
option for forcemain construction will encounter bedrock; however, the further from the
Minnesota River, the deeper the bedrock appears. Any new forcemain route should plan for
rock excavation as part of the project planning. Prior to design, it is recommended that soil
borings along the selected forcemain route be completed to better understand the depths and
composition of bedrock and soil material. If the project were to be constructed using
tunnelling through bedrock, significantly higher costs can be expected to employ tunnelling
equipment capable of tunnelling through bedrock.
L16 Dual Forcemain Feasibility Report TKDA Project No. 21396.001
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 9
85
Tunnelling at County Road 101 Bridge — To build or replace a forcemain crossing at Bridge
No. 5944 and under the mill pond would involve excavations of tunnelling pits to depths of 30
feet. Tunnelling would be used to cross under the "Mill Pond" at the bridge and would include
an estimated 16 -foot diameter pits on both sides of the bridge. Other challenges to placing
large tunnelling pits in this area could include impacts to public and private utilities, private
property impacts, parking lot impacts, and retaining wall, lighting, and bituminous trail
impacts. Staging for tunnelling operations would likely require property acquisition. If a route
is selected that crosses the "Mill Pond" area, it is recommended that the crossing be south of
CR 101 for the following reasons:
• Provides for separation from existing forcemain
• Less severe slopes
• More open space for tunneling pits and staging
Affixing Forcemain to the
County Road 101 Bridge —
Instead of boring under the
bridge in the mill crossing area,
we evaluated attaching the new
forcemain to the existing bridge.
We have discussed this option
with Scott County, and they
indicate that it may be possible
but further review will be
necessary.
740 --
730 -
DESIGN NW (010O) -
R. 7)?.6
(:=1)
720-
710 -
700 L_
EL. 717.00
GROUTED RIPRAP (IS TOTAL
THICKNESS) WITH r CRANuLAR
r1LTER (TYPJ
WC T ABUT.
EAST A8(1T.
Figure 12: Bridge 5944 General Elevation
Figure 11: Bridge 5944
•
GENERAL ELEVATION
NORMAL TO STREAM
REGULATORY NW (0100)
EL. 720.7®
TRAIL
3
LOW NEWER
EL. 724.53
-r
1
J
EL. 716.44
HP 12 X 53
PILES. TYP.
PROFILE CRAM
(EXIST. 1 PROPOSED)
740
730
720
710
700
L16 Dual Forcemain Feasibility Report TKDA Project No. 21396.001
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 10
86
Below are a few design considerations:
• Load rating of the bridge would be
confirmed to see if fascia beam and first
interior beam can take the additional load.
• The wingwalls sit outside of the deck by
approx. 2 feet. There is a pilaster midspan
that is also offset from edge of deck by
approx. 2 feet. The forcemain would need a
substantial hanger system to cantilever
about 5 feet from the beam.
• This bridge has above average aesthetics.
• There are lights on the bridge, so the
conduit for lighting may interfere with
forcemain alignment.
• Forcemain that hangs lower than the
bottom of the beam would impede vertical
clearance to the trail, and the hydraulic
opening for the crossing will be reduced.
• Forcemain would need insulation.
0
Figure 13: Bridge 5944
Based on the design considerations, several options were considered:
Option 1: Design and fabricate a hanger system that would use the exterior barrier and
overhang to support a frame and roller system to place the pipe on to cross the bridge.
Option 2: Design a support system that would allow a beam to cantilever out from the bottom
of the facia girder and the first interior girder. Overhead clearance on the trail would have to
be considered.
Option 3: Design a support system that would place the forcemain pipe between the girder
lines, supported by a modified diaphragm. That would allow a straight line across the bridge
for the forcemain, avoiding the need for 90 -
degree elbows and possible thrust blocks. It
would also eliminate the aesthetic impact of
placing the forcemain on the exterior of the
bridge. Construction would require removing a
section of the bridge backwall and roadway
impacts to County Road 101.
The cost for these options, less engineering,
would be approximately $1500 per linear foot
($171,000). The cost includes material, labor,
and insulation for a pipe support system. It also
includes the cost, if needed, for thrust blocks at
each end of the bridge where the forcemain
pipe would need 90 -degree bends. Other costs,
including roadway work, are not included. If a
walkway for access to the pipe were required,
that would significantly increase the cost. Also,
as an added protection against vandalism, a
fence on top of the barrier may be needed, and
that would add to the cost as well.
Figure 14: Bridge 5944
L16 Dual Forcemain Feasibility Report TKDA Project No. 21396.001
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 11
87
It is recommended that final design process review the placement of the forcemain within the
girder lines (Option 3). Costs within this report include this recommendation.
Utilities — Existing utilities are located along each route. In certain areas, public or private
utilities may need to be relocated to build the new forcemain. During design, the route would
be refined to attempt to minimize public or private utility relocation.
Environmental Impacts — With any construction, there is potential for erosion. The "Mill
Pond" area with steep slopes in close proximity to wetland areas appears especially
sensitive. Redundant erosion control measures would be employed in this or other sensitive
environmental areas.
Proximity to Existing Forcemain — The routes shown in close proximity to the existing
forcemain add risk to the potential for damage to the existing forcemain that would be in
service during construction. Rock excavation or tunnelling adds to this risk. If a route is
selected that is in close proximity to the existing forcemain, the contractor must be prepared
to repair a forcemain leak and clean up any wastewater as a part of that break.
The tradeoffs for each option related to these and other challenges have been evaluated.
See the "Risk Register" and "Options Screening Table" provided in Appendix C and D.
5.6 Maintenance Considerations
Maintenance for a new dual forcemain will be similar to the maintenance on the existing
forcemain pipe. The alternatives reviewed have different trade-offs. Generally, options A and
B along County Road 101 would be the least preferred from a maintenance perspective due
to the higher speeds of traffic along County Road 101. Working with Scott County, the valve
manholes could be constructed with a short driveway access. Option C2 places the pipe
within an easement corridor area that may be difficult to access because it is away from a
roadway corridor and pavement areas. Option C2 would be especially difficult in the winter
from a maintenance perspective. Options B2 or C appear to be the most favorable in terms of
maintenance.
6.0 Cost Estimates
6.1 Existing System Estimate
If a second line is not constructed, the existing forcemain should be more thoroughly
inspected to establish the condition and look for potential failure risks. Some tests will require
the forcemain to be removed from service to perform video inspection of the pipe interior;
temporary conveyance will be necessary to maintain service during inspection.
It is recommended that, once the new secondary forcemain system is constructed and
operational, the existing forcemain that was not reconstructed in the mid -1990s be lined using
a CIPP method. The estimated cost for this work is $98,000 ($350 per linear foot).
6.2 Dual Forcemain Alternatives Estimates
The three alternatives were evaluated for costs based on two construction methods, one with
open trench construction and the other using tunnelling. Tunnelling will still be incorporated in
the trenching method at select locations, such as highway and rail crossings, to minimize
disruptions. Two additional sub -options were reviewed with slightly different routes for
alternatives B and C. These sub -options are labeled Alternatives B2 and C2.
L16 Dual Forcemain Feasibility Report TKDA Project No. 21396.001
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 12
88
The presence of bedrock creates significant uncertainty in the cost estimates. Additional soil
borings during the final design process will improve the estimate of rock removal that will be
necessary, however construction progress can be expected to will take more time than a
normal forcemain project due to bedrock and monitoring for cultural resources.
Based on estimates of bedrock, the cost of tunnelling the entire route was significantly higher
than open trench construction. The trenching version of Alternate B2 was identified as having
the lowest cost.
Table 1
Alternatives Estimates
ALTERNATE
OPEN CUT
TUNNELLED
A
$ 5.1 Million
$ 15.5 Million
B
$ 3.5 Million
$ 15.4 Million
B2
$ 3.1 Million
$ 12.5 Million
C
$ 5.3 Million
$ 13.3 Million
C2
$ 4.9 Million
$ 10.7 Million
See Appendix B for detailed cost breakdown.
7.0 Evaluation of Alternatives
7.1 Options Screening
Each alternative route has advantages and disadvantages to consider. An options screening
table was prepared to document these advantages and disadvantages for the purpose of
evaluating and selecting the best alternative and is included as Appendix D.
7.2 Risk Register
A matrix of project design and construction risks was created to identify risks and a response
if necessary. Primary risks are bedrock impacts, utility impacts, and inadvertent cultural
resource discoveries. See Appendix C for the full risk register.
7.3 Options Scoring
Using the information prepared in the options screening table and risk register, scoring
criteria were prepared to evaluate each option against one another. Numerical scores were
given for each alternative considering advantages, disadvantages, risks, and costs.
Alternatives scoring indicates that Alternate B2 constructed using open cut construction
scored the highest using the scoring criteria.
Table 2
Options Scoring
ALTERNATIVE
TOTAL SCORE
A
20
A - TUNNELLED
21
B
36
B2
37
B -TUNNELLED
34
C
35
C2
36
C - TUNNELLED
33
L16 Dual Forcemain Feasibility Report TKDA Project No. 21396.001
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 13
89
8.0 Conclusion and Recommendations
A significant portion of the wastewater generated by the City of Shakopee is routed to Lift
Station 16 and through the forcemain under consideration. Constructing a second forcemain
provides important redundancy to the City's wastewater conveyance system, allowing for
continued operation during maintenance or in the event of damage to the existing forcemain.
Route options and methods of construction were reviewed to evaluate costs, risks, and
tradeoffs of adding a secondary forcemain serving L16. Considering cost, risk, and other
tradeoffs, the following actions are recommended:
1. Construct a secondary forcemain serving Lift Station 16.
2. Construction of Alternate B2 using an open trench method.
3. Ongoing cultural resource review during construction.
4. Once Alternate B2 is complete, CIPP line the existing 16" forcemain segment that
was not reconstructed in the 1990s. This could be performed as a separate project or
as a part of the dual forcemain work.
5. Continued maintenance and evaluation of valves on the existing forcemain system.
Replace as necessary.
Constructing Alternate B2 has a total estimated cost of $3.1 million, which includes a 15%
contingency and other construction expenses. Project funding is expected to come from
sanitary sewer funds and the City's general fund. Regardless of the chosen alternate, it is
recommended that ongoing cultural resources work take place as the project moves from
feasibility to planning and construction stages. Compliance with state law will require
archaeological reconnaissance survey, consultation with the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux
Community (and other Minnesota Dakota Communities), the Minnesota Indian Affairs Council
(MIAC), Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), and Office of the State
Archaeologist (OSA). Continued dialogue with involved agencies and stakeholders, including
consultation and feedback regarding proposed route options should guide the next steps of
the process.
All alternative route options have challenges and tradeoffs. Alternatively if the City does not
choose to move forward with construction of an alternative within 5 years of this report, it is
recommended that the City complete a project to CIPP line the existing forcemain at the "mill
pond" crossing at a cost estimated at $148,000 and keep up with maintenance and
replacement of forcemain system components at all structures and manholes. However, any
maintenance on the existing forcemain will require the expense of bypass pumping if the dual
forcemain is not installed.
The improvements are necessary to allow for safe and reliable conveyance of wastewater for
L16. The project will be competitively bid to allow for a cost-effective improvement. The
feasibility study has provided an overall analysis of the feasible improvements for
consideration within this project area. Therefore, the proposed improvements within the areas
outlined in this report are necessary, cost effective, and feasible from an engineering
standpoint.
L16 Dual Forcemain Feasibility Report TKDA Project No. 21396.001
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 14
90
1 TKDA
Appendix A
Project Layouts
91
Z6
BMpinoRei par,\Saaa4S Zo\ay° aad0Ne4S,-11,,
wd l:Z- 9Z0Z `L6 30a
£6
\ SCALE IN FEET
/ \
Iiti ^„ •' d Z' } . �rryy_ I ,, . LL'
1 1
— UGFO— — — - —
.GFO—
--hU
UGFO— '
_.
O
O
Z
/�'
Z
/ !
/
-
/ �d I
.; r
// A f• I
- L—j!t I
—.�GF
illDIY
_ if:
L r ia 1n h
I — .O
---�7GF0—
,,
t,
-
f
�
w y>- ► ,..
�i H 1. ! I ,,
s ��
ALTERNATE A
- .1'1111 + t I -
-
J.. r.... 1. GFO— — — 111—
III
-f•gl-
''vIIII Q.'-
FO it
''
-e
I
; .�• 1111
c - (any
;:�q .
— —1 GF0
o _ III,
fig ' K? , ,' I yI { Z << '---,+� -sc -® , ,,-� _
, :0,—;!,33,2 � r'v
4
t 1
. .. .
II
Iii
#Y
!,iitti? .
1
I
LL
1
SHAKOPEE FORCEMAIN
STUDY
. `'� ;
1
- _ _ n. • - ILI
r
�,..
___,,,..,2____-0----,- c .,.., �,1
c.,,,-"t'p
?Ja HVOGNVN3HS
--
,
1 �`', sir ,4,
'
/ /
�7 /r
•,i
»—
a
LL
N
i1 I.. L''IL!'hIL',.. , ,•„,
./
v—
'
I
I J���
1 _— v ,/
4
-- —
{
.
F L c 1.
loil
ak
IM
Lr
.. J �+•r, O11
1 iA -• ;$
R ? •..a.._.. a/1
W.:
Iii , Ii• Il
r
�. W
\ �,�, - `
-
I
1 i ``
I a t '�,�..
i _ .4 (
J C
J 1 b
7 tA.•.1
W1 I '— 1 1.11 '�is11 • .� r•
y _M,
F
1
I Q
Il=r
b
It
1
It ;'
I
LL
r
, .
r d
p
al
tit
—
A .
Y
1C 1 Y,. z
n
j II_
III
— — — od,; 1 I
— —
n
°
— c
.F 1
1
•,' • 1
— — ��on— —
-<� 1cSNIZbibS—---
'� • •
II
n__. ,,arms —
, • ;-
O
1 I . y�L'
� 1 A01
°
—
j
r
—
\� \
, •
4 I
e \ S• Q
I
i
c UGFO :h
-
d5n -1—<----..,-.'-
1• ! i` ,l
� _. _ UGFO---
LL.
•
—
-=• —"'
d +
_
rr
�i1
cn
�
O
6
d
U
—
y. .. ". - ..
l m �1
%1 � U 7'
w
mod- — %� W
NFM�,' ,4:
U (7 I J Q 1 yllli�t
yy
_
₹'-gvo
1.
"�
nr
•ff
- —'
�. — J:JI I
+f!
111
- �-
1'
r.
.. T
I '��i t'-'''-.•.,-_
I
, • 1 c I.[Y 1
Mt
'�NIr^'
7,,'1'1,..!'1
I
�-
- _.
1t! MIN
— —
_ yY
,._,____-_111--:-.1IIJ i
_� , ,' UG--i____4,—\,
- _ �„r-r-LR�\\\'.:2\
AL �
-1 �•—�—\ ^MARSCH 4 , .1 � 1 -
` I tea• .. O ,i, I
I�,-
n
n
•
Q
6mp;noReiToafoad,,ea4S ,0,1,10,0Jd b0\L0096£lZ4, aad0Ne4S\z-0\71
wdZl Z- 9Z0Z LL 3Oa
vs
SCALE IN FEET
� � I
jr ...�d /�% .p, 1 �,,,rL, . ' • LL
_ - UGFO- - - - -
-FUGFO-
UGFO-
ON
• • � /�J i O f I 1
.GF
Y' -i III
—-UGFO-_
1
-
D
, --% _.//ia
- t• - .§/, 4-
/a/J�� r
J w 1,
�+ � - �� .' � I J �'.-: alp. � , „ s = ,.
Via. .-' W ._-<.. -�i".--i
1_
n
.--•.
_
ALTERNATE B
L -1
.•ni
p •
•-1
ri 1:''''
- - Ll1GF0- __ III-lu
III
FO A
.=
=vGtT
_ .
I�
T'
I.`
• '. t
III 'I
.: II II
, '.
''n'.
II
f
II
v
'111V.%
!II
�'
T
_.- It c��
I
id
r
�' I _
y
^ •
tY
SHAKOPEE FORCEMAIN
STUDY
III i—
rI_'Y'�
_ ,,jj l I 1 \ • • ''
.., - S' t V, E.Cr-- \ ;,
1'`1
fit:;
I.
n A
1-1
_
Vi
w l {l
Z
I} .
d
3
II
•, 1, . lYt4 �'".. ..
=
FI
I�,_�_
-1
_ z....
- - ..
_ .„...,.."_,A.
.,�
vi,
_�.:. - -: -�' : 1,. I
�c wl
-d HdO4NdN3HS
' • •�j
,
4 / 1 ill
'I
r
t <
I I IIIILI -.• 4�., �r QO /�
H
I I.Vh
Q
I —
I
/ e
oc
r 1
L r
r.;_ 1-6,4,- -'-r, —
Q W
JAI
' , . -4- - 4
I
1� 1
' II0
1 I
11
— _ g_'
3
tY
" + I I
_ pr
-
i �"
-, ,
`. 1
•'. z � i
..' 114 Ilk
,. —
1111
-
_
_ -
I
Q
1 l -r=1'
III
c,
r,1
I IvIII_
j
" \ - ,�
r
, ...., . . .
IIch k
i
ll
4,
III
-- - ' >r
O L
I - --�- _
c' I
• i
111 1_ _ �UOn _ Q —_ _
_ _ _
< -�<� 1S NIZV&VS
,
•' c =
6 `
—
_ <, —
1 '''ill''
i
«
r.
—
—
«
/
f
4
11----------1.
f
;
4
z
z
Z Q'
N
< .:.
I
'1'r Q
I
I
UGF i 'O „;
f
, yr
r k `
a—�, UGFO, .
• •.•
=
I { tir
w
/
I.
w
..; s;, -,
•. .. f'• .Aw7-r `. �. - . i.e J J
mob, _ -4
1 .1 �.t
_
,----,—..-.-,L-::.„--4—.<
..5
tiv.�t �+' s y�"S.• ,,A
y ^% : i ' ¢ I v ❑ (n W H is
f '� O •• Z m :< a U I�1
U
O I l' 0
� . : U I w w" �.
w } I a ❑ �•, M
,' I Ix� _-
• _ moo_ r :
owl:
. I
- -AFL:--�'
i
i.
�\I4
' 1
1 irny
at Vii!
�.... U�
p
_ 6
. II
.r
I'a
a"
i a
�W
, r 1 c
Ya-i..,.� .
rte,
-
..
-
_ GF _
k 1
U —I N p. r. FO I • - —
I
�,--- \
a • r — -
Iry �. - _ `- •. .• e_
�_. ` uG /_ - •' RSCHAI I RD I \ II\� \ `
ll
n1A I'nI
I� ,L -te ". ,
b , 0 1 v 1 t
-
^ I�
InI
��
y
H
o
6mp;noRei Toaroad,,ea4S Z0\atfa L0\uoiyonpad b0\10096£lZ 4, aad0Ne4S\z-1,..,
wdZl Z- 9Z0Z LL 30a
9s
SCALE IN FEET
/7
Ir / - / / N r ,.1.__ 1 . y` • r.i '
` ,i.d 1%W�NS i } L �rry�_ I .- '.,
J/ r, / �/: i,
;-. -UGFO- - - _ -UGFO-
q
.--I.UGFO-
_.
t , Cki7/j/ / /GF
+, .,. / r.
. 4' / / , I
/" /�, t 11L- it lia', 1
.�
- .III II
±; i !;-1- 7
•
F°
----C7GF0-
'
_-
�� Jr, , Q t.
// J� ^ �, >
�' , �I , H
1 . � � , -< , '-+.`".& c
ALTERNATE C
• - lir i
/�
1
•' 1.
,, -
— 1:'LUGFO- - - III-
-: III
'` 1 IIII
I
FO t
__,G
....
-
,
II
•_ _
`T
_-
;AllOr. IIyy
„
iT. . . III I { __ s << =---4.1,-..---VG. ='' G� - - ,�E$2
•.. � �r '
I <�
`,� �'. *,
l 1I/P_7�•r
<
II
' - fir
II
r .. III II ,_- t
,--`---“<--
I-.G� - ,� ��
.
'j
- >
!
•
.. ':..
i1;
w III
�. E
1.._'4.1}."�1t
II
III '
of 1 t, ii :♦ ,..
1
i_ z
^ �.a._
s
Z` III
•—
,. —a
SHAKOPEE FORCEMAIN
STUDY
t
�
i_
Lli
II�>-
P
�
-14
_.
. 11.11 , ..
iii
�`y
jd HdO4NdN3HS
I tr
°
i ?..,1
4 ! • // _
� vU Ji
Al
_!
w Huum •... ... p.r I/Q Q I 11 ' , ti I ,'J, I ,., , Jae Q- .,
...
— —ae —
uw,• -
- //J
I b r o
- /
' o
liP
',^O //
m
{I
•-sky
''•'''' , 1
q�7•.1 1_i- -.
I
n
`r
j1 o•
r..
�� ii
-
I�1` .
J I
d
I /
VV - _ 4
II Ia
I
LL _ <i •'''
l
f II 1 -
1 0_ " -�
1 a Ii
_, _ g 1r
1 la1-u �6• .� I' .
fi a ._ y , 11 ' it s .� ..,; �sfr i ..�
'F o T 1 L wi •'
-1yi\.`.. , . L.'. I 1
-
— — - Dion
_IIn
1r
ICI
II
LLLL
III
b
fl
L
I - L +` .
II _1 -X
- 4
4. i
I a
�'
- ,f...`i
—
. • _I
\\ 'i
ii ,III
III IIII_
4H
I •'ti.z
Ica
�F - - o,t n—
• o
1 .
`
<:-
— — -orlon— — — — Sao —
-NIZV
- _L.,- ode!, ;_,..,,,,,,,,-_-_,_ii-
e
— — •��, ,
IVS n«
t c�
r f
fli1S
' 1 111 i b p__,
.. F
�. .I-
:af� •"�
Z1 '2 Q Y{
— Z FO -ti
LL,
r
\ cn O if•
tt U 1 r=
C3
cn
• _
.`
.r UGFO-, - -.4waI�
.• 0 i . k..a I
•+
;`~ �. �`,
' y
.,- I._
�
Lowal.;. ,
z '\, -.z
Q K
°!
- _ .:tom
O° f W 1 O .
' U Q 1 U Y Q
I W Al Q O W
H n
•
"
nI`•--
..•
Fo_IN I\,�__
4 J_k)
• i I\ --•1 — — , , ` MARSCHAUU RD y r \\\:2\\
h
k
r••
6mpino.,pafoad\Saaa4S ZO\aya l0\uol1o,0Jd b0\10096£124, aad0,,S\Z-11,1
wdZl Z- 9Z0Z LL 30a
1 TKDA
Appendix B
Cost Estimate
96
L16 DUAL FORCEMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
COST ESTIMATE
1/2/2026
Trenching
Directional Drilling
ALTERNATE A
UNIT
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
ESTIMATE
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
ESTIMATE
MOBILIZATION (5%)
LS
1
$ 178,600
$ 178,600
1
$ 567,000
$ 567,000
REMOVE AND REPLACE PAVEMENT
SQ YD
7167
$ 200
$ 1,433,400
500
$ 200
$ 100,000
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (SOIL)
LF
4000
$ 90
$ 360,000
4000
$ 850
$ 3,400,000
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (BEDROCK)
LF
4000
$ 90
$ 360,000
4000
$ 1,700
$ 6,800,000
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (RR CROSSING) WITH CASING
LF
75
$ 850
$ 63,750
75
$ 850
$ 63,750
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (CR 101 CROSSING) WITH CASING
LF
100
$ 850
$ 85,000
100
$ 850
$ 85,000
MILL CROSSING PIT WITH STRUCTURE
EA
2
$ 40,000
$ 80,000
2
$ 40,000
$ 80,000
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (AFFIXED TO BRIDGE)*
LF
114
$ 1,500
$ 171,000
114
$ 1,500
$ 171,000
CONNECT TO EXISTING L16
EA
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
CONNECT TO EXISTING MH
EA
1
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
1
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
PUBLIC UTILITY IMPACTS
LS
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
ROCK EXCAVATION (ASSUMES 50% OF LENGTH INCLUDES ROCK)
CY
3700
$ 100
$ 370,000
520
$ 100
$ 52,000
VAULT STRUCTURES
EA
5
$ 40,000
$ 200,000
5
$ 40,000
$ 200,000
MANHOLES
EA
5
$ 20,000
$ 100,000
5
$ 20,000
$ 100,000
DEWATERING
LS
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
EROSION CONTROL
LS
1
$ 117,000
$ 117,000
1
$ 56,000
$ 56,000
TRAFFIC CONTROL
LS
1
$ 67,000
$ 67,000
1
$ 67,000
$ 67,000
SUBTOTAL
$ 3,750,750
$ 11,906,750
CONTINGENCY
15%
$ 562,613
15%
$ 1,786,013
ENGINEERING, INSPECTION, SURVEYING, STAKING, CONTRACT ADMIN
15%
$ 562,613
15%
$ 1,786,013
PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND EXPENSES
SF
400
$ 10.00
$ 4,000
400
$ 10.00
$ 4,000
CULTURAL RESOURCE MONITORING
$ 252,000
$ 30,000
PERMITS AND FEES
$ 5,000
$ 5,000
TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
$ 5,136,975
$ 15,517,775
* If affixing to bridge is not possible cost for tunneling estimated at $600,000
Trenching
Directional Drilling
ALTERNATE B
UNIT
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
ESTIMATE
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
ESTIMATE
MOBILIZATION (5%)
LS
1
$ 119,800
$ 119,800
1
$ 561,800
$ 561,800
REMOVE AND REPLACE PAVEMENT
SQ YD
2000
$ 200
$ 400,000
500
$ 200
$ 100,000
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (SOIL)
LF
4000
$ 90
$ 360,000
4000
$ 850
$ 3,400,000
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (ROCK)
LF
4000
$ 90
$ 360,000
4000
$ 1,700
$ 6,800,000
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (RR CROSSING) WITH CASING
LF
75
$ 850
$ 63,750
75
$ 850
$ 63,750
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (CR 101 CROSSING) WITH CASING
LF
100
$ 850
$ 85,000
100
$ 850
$ 85,000
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (AFFIXED TO BRIDGE)*
LF
114
$ 1,500
$ 171,000
114
$ 1,500
$ 171,000
CONNECT TO EXISTING L16
EA
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
CONNECT TO EXISTING MH
EA
1
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
1
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
PUBLIC UTILITY IMPACTS
LS
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
ROCK EXCAVATION (ASSUMES 50% OF LENGTH INCLUDES ROCK)
CY
3700
$ 100
$ 370,000
520
$ 100
$ 52,000
VAULT STRUCTURES
EA
5
$ 40,000
$ 200,000
5
$ 40,000
$ 200,000
MANHOLES
EA
5
$ 20,000
$ 100,000
5
$ 20,000
$ 100,000
DEWATERING
LS
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
EROSION CONTROL
LS
1
$ 78,000
$ 78,000
1
$ 55,000
$ 55,000
TRAFFIC CONTROL
LS
1
$ 44,000
$ 44,000
1
$ 44,000
$ 44,000
SUBTOTAL
$ 2,516,550
$ 11,797,550
CONTINGENCY
15%
$ 377,483
15%
$ 1,769,633
ENGINEERING, INSPECTION, SURVEYING, STAKING, CONTRACTADMIN
15%
$ 377,483
15%
$ 1,769,633
PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND EXPENSES
SF
400
$ 10.00
$ 4,000
400
$ 10.00
$ 4,000
CULTURAL RESOURCE MONITORING
$ 246,000
$ 30,000
PERMITS AND FEES
$ 5,000
$ 5,000
TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
$ 3,526,515
$ 15,375,815
* If affixing to bridge is not possible cost for tunneling estimated at $600,000
Trenching
Directional Drilling
ALTERNATE B2
UNIT
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
ESTIMATE
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
ESTIMATE
MOBILIZATION (5%)
LS
1
$ 105,200
$ 105,200
1
$ 456,000
$ 456,000
REMOVE AND REPLACE PAVEMENT
SQ YD
2000
$ 200
$ 400,000
500
$ 200
$ 100,000
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (SOIL)
LF
3200
$ 90
$ 288,000
3200
$ 850
$ 2,720,000
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (ROCK)
LF
3200
$ 90
$ 288,000
3200
$ 1,700
$ 5,440,000
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (RR CROSSING) WITH CASING
LF
75
$ 850
$ 63,750
75
$ 850
$ 63,750
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (CR 101 CROSSING) WITH CASING
LF
100
$ 850
$ 85,000
100
$ 850
$ 85,000
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (AFFIXED TO BRIDGE)*
LF
114
$ 1,500
$ 171,000
114
$ 1,500
$ 171,000
CONNECT TO EXISTING L16
EA
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
CONNECT TO EXISTING MH
EA
1
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
1
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
PUBLIC UTILITY IMPACTS
LS
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
ROCK EXCAVATION (ASSUMES 50% OF LENGTH INCLUDES ROCK)
CY
2960
$ 100
$ 296,000
520
$ 100
$ 52,000
VAULT STRUCTURES
EA
4
$ 40,000
$ 160,000
4
$ 40,000
$ 160,000
97
L16 DUAL FORCEMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
COST ESTIMATE
1/2/2026
MANHOLES
EA
4
$ 20,000
$ 80,000
4
$ 20,000
$ 80,000
DEWATERING
LS
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
EROSION CONTROL
LS
1
$ 68,000
$ 68,000
1
$ 45,000
$ 45,000
TRAFFIC CONTROL
LS
1
$ 39,000
$ 39,000
1
$ 39,000
$ 39,000
SUBTOTAL
$ 2,208,950
$ 9,576,750
CONTINGENCY
15%
$ 331,343
15%
$ 1,436,513
ENGINEERING, INSPECTION, SURVEYING, STAKING, CONTRACTADMIN
15%
$ 331,343
15%
$ 1,436,513
PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND EXPENSES
SF
400
$ 10.00
$ 4,000
400
$ 10.00
$ 4,000
CULTURAL RESOURCE MONITORING
$ 183,000
$ 24,000
PERMITS AND FEES
$ 5,000
$ 5,000
TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
$ 3,063,635
$ 12,482,775
* If affixing to bridge is not possible cost for tunneling estimated at $600,000
Trenching
Directional Drilling
ALTERNATE C
UNIT
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
ESTIMATE
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
ESTIMATE
MOBILIZATION (5%)
LS
1
$ 187,400
$ 187,400
1
$ 484,800
$ 484,800
REMOVE AND REPLACE PAVEMENT
SQ YD
10670
$ 200
$ 2,134,000
3300
$ 200
$ 660,000
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (SOIL)
LF
3200
$ 90
$ 288,000
3250
$ 850
$ 2,762,500
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (ROCK)
LF
3200
$ 90
$ 288,000
3250
$ 1,700
$ 5,525,000
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (RR CROSSING) WITH CASING
LF
25
$ 850
$ 21,250
25
$ 850
$ 21,250
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (CR 101 CROSSING AND MARSCHALL) WITH CASING
LF
200
$ 850
$ 170,000
200
$ 850
$ 170,000
CONNECT TO EXISTING L16
EA
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
CONNECT TO EXISTING MH
EA
1
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
1
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
PUBLIC UTILITY IMPACTS
LS
1
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
1
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
ROCK EXCAVATION (ASSUMES 50% OF LENGTH INCLUDES ROCK)
CY
1780
$ 100
$ 178,000
370
$ 100
$ 37,000
VAULT STRUCTURES
EA
4
$ 40,000
$ 160,000
4
$ 40,000
$ 160,000
MANHOLES
EA
4
$ 20,000
$ 80,000
4
$ 20,000
$ 80,000
DEWATERING
LS
1
$ 20,000
$ 20,000
1
$ 20,000
$ 20,000
EROSION CONTROL
LS
1
$ 122,000
$ 122,000
1
$ 48,000
$ 48,000
TRAFFIC CONTROL
LS
1
$ 122,000
$ 122,000
1
$ 48,000
$ 48,000
SUBTOTAL
$ 3,935,650
$ 10,181,550
CONTINGENCY
15%
$ 590,348
15%
$ 1,527,233
ENGINEERING, INSPECTION, SURVEYING, STAKING, CONTRACTADMIN
15%
$ 590,348
15%
$ 1,527,233
PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND EXPENSES
$
$
CULTURAL RESOURCE MONITORING
$ 192,000
$ 24,000
PERMITS AND FEES
$ 5,000
$ 5,000
TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
$ 5,313,345
$ 13,265,015
Trenching
Directional Drilling
ALTERNATE C2
UNIT
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
ESTIMATE
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
ESTIMATE
MOBILIZATION (5%)
LS
1
$ 165,100
$ 165,100
1
$ 387,800
$ 387,800
REMOVE AND REPLACE PAVEMENT
SQ YD
8870
$ 200
$ 1,774,000
3300
$ 200
$ 660,000
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (SOIL)
LF
3450
$ 90
$ 310,500
2550
$ 850
$ 2,167,500
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (ROCK)
LF
3450
$ 90
$ 310,500
2500
$ 1,700
$ 4,250,000
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (RR CROSSING) WITH CASING
LF
25
$ 850
$ 21,250
25
$ 850
$ 21,250
12" PVC FORCEMAIN (CR 101 CROSSING) WITH CASING
LF
100
$ 850
$ 85,000
200
$ 850
$ 170,000
CONNECT TO EXISTING L16
EA
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
CONNECT TO EXISTING MH
EA
1
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
1
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
PUBLIC UTILITY IMPACTS
LS
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
1
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
ROCK EXCAVATION (ASSUMES 50% OF LENGTH INCLUDES ROCK)
CY
2110
$ 100
$ 211,000
370
$ 100
$ 37,000
VAULT STRUCTURES
EA
4
$ 40,000
$ 160,000
4
$ 40,000
$ 160,000
MANHOLES
EA
4
$ 20,000
$ 80,000
4
$ 20,000
$ 80,000
DEWATERING
LS
1
$ 20,000
$ 20,000
1
$ 20,000
$ 20,000
EROSION CONTROL
LS
1
$ 107,000
$ 107,000
1
$ 38,000
$ 38,000
TRAFFIC CONTROL
LS
1
$ 107,000
$ 107,000
1
$ 38,000
$ 38,000
SUBTOTAL
$ 3,466,350
$ 8,144,550
CONTINGENCY
15%
$ 519,953
15%
$ 1,221,683
ENGINEERING, INSPECTION, SURVEYING, STAKING, CONTRACTADMIN
15%
$ 519,953
15%
$ 1,221,683
PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND EXPENSES
SF
10000
$ 10.00
$ 100,000
10000
$ 10.00
$ 100,000
CULTURAL RESOURCE MONITORING
$ 276,000
$ 24,000
PERMITS AND FEES
$ 5,000
$ 5,000
TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
$ 4,887,255
$ 10,716,915
* Unit pricing reflects conservative budgetary pricing and includes 15% contingency. Once an alternative is chosen, additional data collection will allow for refinement of the cost estimate
98
B L D
CULIII t
HERITAGE
CONSULTING
CONSULTING LLC.
STEVEN J. BL'N D O, MA
3939 SAND HILL RD„ KETTLE RE'VEP., MI 55757
218-273-0074 a STEVE NO B LOINDOCO N SU LTI N COM
%WNW,• OLOINCIOCO ISIS ICJ L T I NCI G. C O M
RE: Cost Estimates for Shakopee Forcemain Project
November 25, 2025
Two tables of cost estimates follow. The first is based on best guesses for pre -construction
archaeological testing needed to comply with state law. Ranges are given as the final plans have
not been determined. Upon final design, these estimates should be revisited and through project
consultation and agency coordination, revisions would be expected.
Shakopee Forcemain Archaeological Testing Cost Estimates
Alternates
Archaeological Testing (range)
Alternate A
$12,250 to $16,050
Alternate B
$18,000 to $23,450
Alternate B (western half) to Alternate B2
$ 13,500 to $17,750
Alternate C
$17,000 to $22,000
Alternate C2 (additional to other alternates)
$7,500 to $9,500
Assumptions as follows: based SHPO/OSA Phase I Archaeological Guidelines including testing methodology of 15
meter intervals where appropriate; subject to change based on MIAC, THPO, SMSC, and State Agency input
through review process; assumptions of fewer than two new or updated site forms; no more than 25 artifacts
recovered; no human remains encountered; and no deep testing required
The second table, below, include monitoring estimates based on best guesses for speed of
installation at 50 to 100 feet per day. Per Day Monitoring cost includes onsite monitor, expenses,
and mapping, artifacts/site forms, and report writing. Any Alternate will require completion of
the Monitoring Plan/Inadvertent Discovery Plan.
Shakopee Forcemain Archaeological Monitoring Cost Estimates
Alternate A
Monitoring Plan/Inadvertent
Discovery Plan
$2,000
Monitoring/Day
$1,500*
Total Monitoring Cost
Based on 84 Days
$ 126,000
Based on excavation and installation at 100 feet/day
Based on 168 days
$252,000
Based on excavation and installation at 50 feet/day
99
Alternate B
Monitoring Plan/Inadvertent
Discovery Plan
$2,000
Monitoring/Day
$1,500*
Total Monitoring Cost
Based on 82 Days
$123,000
Based on excavation and installation at 100 feet/day
Based on 164 days
$246,000
Based on excavation and installation at 50 feet/day
Alternate B (western half) to Alternate B2
Monitoring Plan/Inadvertent
Discovery Plan
$2,000
Monitoring/Day
$1,500*
Total Monitoring Cost
Based on 61 Days
$91,500
Based on excavation and installation at 100 feet/day
Based on 122 days
$183,000
Based on excavation and installation at 50 feet/day
Alt B (western half) — 100 ft/day — 41 days; 50 ft/day — 82 days to Alt B2 — 100 ft/day — 20 days; 50 ft/day — 40 days
Alternate C
Monitoring Plan/Inadvertent
Discovery Plan
$2,000
Monitoring/Day
$1,500*
Total Monitoring Cost
Based on 64 Days
$96,000
Based on excavation and installation at 100 feet/day
Based on 128 days
$192,000
Based on excavation and installation at 50 feet/day
Alternate C2 (additional to other alternates)
Monitoring Plan/Inadvertent
Discovery Plan
$2,000
Monitoring/Day
$1,500*
Total Monitoring Cost
Based on 28 Days
$42,000
Based on excavation and installation at 100 feet/day
Based on 56 days
$84,000
Based on excavation and installation at 50 feet/day
*Hourly rate includes single onsite archaeological monitor ($ 125/hour); reporting; expenses; etc.
**Assumptions as follows: based on requirements under MN Statute 307.08 and outcomes of MIAC/THPO/SMSC
Consultation; costs based on assumption of 10 hours/day/5 days/week; no human remains encountered; not
responsible for downtime resulting from machinery failure or unanticipated cultural resources
I hope these make sense. Please let me know if there is anything else we can assist with.
Thanks
-steven
Steven J. Blondo, MA
Owner/Principal Investigator
Blondo Consulting, LLC
100
1 TKDA
Appendix C
Risk Register
101
Shakopee L16 Dual Forcemain Options Risk Register
*Summary of identified risks to evaluate feasibility of methods for placement of dual forcemain for the Shakopee Lift Station L16.
11/26/2025
OPTION
RISK
IMPACTS
LIKELYHOOD
RISK MITIGATION
RISK RESPONSE
No Action
Existing Pipe Failure
• Immediate mobilization to restore service
• Sanitary sewer backups / service disruption / Public Health Concerns
• Environmental Impacts
• Cultural resources impacts
• High emergency response costs
• Delayed response time in scenario of winter failure
Long Term
• Preventive Maintenance / Replacement of
components or pipe
• CIPP lining of existing mill pond crossing
Unlikely In Short Term, Somewhat Likely Emergency Repair / Temporary
la
Conveyance / Clean Up
Flows Below Desired
Velocity
. Slower Lift Station Cycle Times
Somewhat Likely
• Slip -Line Existing Pipe with Smaller Diamete
Pipe
Slip -Line Existing Pipe with Smaller
Diameter Pipe
Dual Forcemain along Parallel
Alignment
Inadvertent Discovery of
Cultural Resources
• Slower construction progress
• Project shutdown≤
• Increased Costs
Likely
• On site archeologist during construction
• Directional Drillinc
• Prepare Cultural Resources Monitoring PIa!
• Prepare Inadvertent Discovery Plai
• Coordination with Tribe:
• Complete Cultural Resources Surve,
Response Outlined in Inadvertent
Discovery Plan
Bedrock Impacts
• Slower construction progress
• Higher Costs
Certain
• Geotechnical Investigation to refine route
Rock Excavation
Work Causes Existing
Forcemain Break
• Immediate mobilization to restore service
• Sanitary sewer backups / service disruption
• Cultural resources impacts
• Environmental Impacts
Possible
• Potholing existing forcemain along route
Emergency Repair / Temporary
Conveyance
• Maintain 10 feet or more separation
Impact to Natural Area at
a Crossing
Bridge g
• Erosion to Mill Pond
• Cultural resources impacts
Possible
• Trench Shoring to reduce impact area
• Directional Drilling
Cleanup
Utility Impacts
' Relocation of some public or private utilities
• Higher Costs
Possible
• Advanced Relocation of Utilities
• Route Refinement
Utility Relocation
Dual Forcemain South of CR 101
Inadvertent Discovery of
Cultural Resources
• Slower construction progress
• Project shutdowns
• Increased Costs
Somewhat Likely
• On site archeologist during construction
• Directional Drilling
• Prepare Cultural Resources Monitoring Plan
• Prepare Inadvertent Discovery Plan
• Coordination with Tribes
• Complete Cultural Resources Surve,
Response Outlined in Inadvertent
Discovery Plan
Bedrock Impacts
• Slower construction progress
• Higher Costs
Certain II
• Geotechnical Investigation to refine route
Rock Excavation
Railroad or County Delay of
Deny Permit
• Route adjustments
Possible
• Meet with Railroad and Scott County in
Advance of Work
Route Refinement
Impact to Natural Area at
Bridge Crossing
• Erosion to Mill Pond
Possible
• Trench Shoring / Silt Fence / Silt Curtain
• Directional Drilling
Cleanup
Dual Forcemain South of CR 101 then
South on Shenandoah Dr, connecting a
4th Ave
Inadvertent Discovery of
Cultural Resources
• Slower construction progress
• Project shutdowns
• Increased Costs
Somewhat Likely
• On site archeologist during construction
• Directional Drilling
• Prepare Cultural Resources Monitoring Plan
• Prepare Inadvertent Discovery Plan
• Coordination with Tribes
• Complete Cultural Resources Surve
Response Outlined in Inadvertent
Discovery Plan
Bedrock Impacts
' Slower construction progress
• Higher Costs
Certain but less than B
ill
• Geotechnical Investigation to refine route
Rock Excavation
Railroad or County Delay of
Deny Permit
• Route adjustments
Possible
• Meet with Railroad and Scott County in
Advance of Work
Route Refinement
Impact to Natural Area at
Bridge Crossing
• Erosion to Mill Pond
Possible
• Trench Shoring / Silt Fence / Silt Curtain
• Directional Drilling
Cleanup
Dual Forcemain Following Marschal
Road and 4th Street
Inadvertent Discovery of
Cultural Resources
• Slower construction progress
• Project shutdowns
• Increased Costs
Possible
• On site archeologist during construction
• Directional Drilling
• Prepare Cultural Resources Monitoring Plan
• Prepare Inadvertent Discovery Plan
• Coordination with Tribes
• Complete Cultural Resources Survey
Response Outlined in Inadvertent
Discovery Plan
Bedrock Impacts
• Slower construction progress
• Higher Costs
Likely
• Geotechnical Investigation to refine route
Rock Excavation
Utility Impacts
• Relocation of some public or private utilities
• Higher Costs
• Advanced Relocation of Utilities
• Route Refinement
Utility Relocation
Dual Forcemain Following Marschal
Road and 4th Street
Inadvertent Discovery of
Cultural Resources
• Slower construction progress
• Project shutdowns
• Increased Costs
Possible
• On site archeologist during construction
• Directional Drilling
• Prepare Cultural Resources Monitoring Plan
• Prepare Inadvertent Discovery Plan
• Coordination with Tribes
• Complete Cultural Resources Survey
Response Outlined in Inadvertent
Discovery Plan
Bedrock Impacts
• Slower construction progress
• Higher Costs
• Geotechnical Investigation to refine route
Rock Excavation
Utility Impacts
• Relocation of some public or private utilities
• Higher Costs
• Advanced Relocation of Utilities
• Route Refinement
Utility Relocation
102
1 TKDA
Appendix D
Option Screening Table
103
1/2/2026
Shakopee L16 Dual Forcemain Options Screening
Summary of advantages / disadvantages for options of placement of dual forcemain for the Shakopee Lift Station L16.
ALTERNATIVE
DESCRIPTION
COST (Millions)
ADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGES
RECOMMENDED
FOR FURTHER
ANALYSIS?
A
Parallel to existing line, offset toward
highway
$52
'
Convenience of being adjacent to
existing Force Main
Risk of being constructed next to active
system
Y
Less Utility Impacts
Under existing trail
Complicated Construction at Mill Pond
Bedrock Impacts
Cultural Resource Concerns
A - TUNNELLED
Parallel to existing line, offset toward
highway
9 y
$15.5
Convenience of being adjacent to
existing Force Main
Risk of being constructed next to active
system
N
Less Utility Impacts
Under existing trail
Complicated Construction at Mill Pond
Bedrock Impacts
Cultural Resource Concerns
B
Following Highway 101 alignment on the
south side
$3 5
Easier restoration
Complicated Construction at Mill Pond
Y
Less Utility Impacts
Right of Way
Bedrock Impacts
Cultural Resource Concerns
B2
Following Highway 101 alignment on the
south side to Shenandoah
$3'1
Easier restoration
Complicated Construction at Mill Pond
Y
Less Utility Impacts
Right of Way
Bedrock Impacts
Cultural Resource Concerns
B - TUNNELLED
Following Highway 101 alignment on the
south side
$15.4
Easier Restoration
Complicated Construction at Mill Pond
N
Less Utility Impacts
Right of Way
Bedrock Impacts
Cultural Resource Concerns
C
Marschall Road and 4th Ave
$5.3
Avoids deep crossing of Mill Pond
Major Utility Relocation
Y
Less Likely for Cultural Resource
Impacts
Trail and roadway impacts
Less bedrock impacts
Could be timed with Planned Trail Work
C2
City utility easement and 4th Ave
$4.9
Avoids deep crossing of Mill Pond
Major Utility Relocation
Y
Less Likely for Cultural Resource
Impacts
Trail and roadway impacts
Less bedrock impacts
Could be timed with Planned Trail Work
C - TUNNELLED
Marschall Road and 4th Ave
$13.3
Avoids deep crossing of Mill Pond
Some Utility Relocation
N
Less Likely for Cultural Resource
Impacts
Trail and roadway impacts
Less bedrock impacts
Could be timed with Planned Trail Work
104
Shakopee L16 Dual Forcemain Options Scoring
Scoring criteria for options of placement of dual forcemain for the Shakopee Lift Station L16.
11/26/2025
ALTERNATIVE
COST*
CULTURAL
RESOURCE IMPACT
EXISTING
FORCEMAIN IMPACT
BEDROCK
UTILITIES
MILL POND
CROSSING
RAILROAD
PERMITTING
RIGHT OF
WAY
BUSINESS
DISRUPTION
TOTAL SCORE
A
6
1
1
1
3
1
3
1
3
20
A- TUNNELLED
4
2
1
1
4
1
3
1
4
21
B
11
3
3
2
5
3
3
1
5
36
B2
12
4
4
2
4
3
3
1
4
37
B -TUNNELLED
6
4
3
2
6
3
3
1
6
34
C
7
5
6
3
1
6
3
3
1
35
C2
8
5
6
3
2
6
3
1
2
36
C- TUNNELLED
2
6
6
3
2
6
3
3
2
33
*Cost scoring criteria doubled
Scoring on 1-6 scale for the 6 options, highest score is most preferrable.
ALTERNATIVE
TOTAL
SCORE
A
20
A - TUNNELLED
21
B
36
B2
37
B -TUNNELLED
34
C
35
C2
36
C - TUNNELLED
33
105
RESOLUTION R2026-028
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA RECEIVING A FEASIBILITY REPORT AND FOR
THE L16 DUAL FORCEMAIN IMPROVEMENTS, SEWER -29-002
WHEREAS, a report has been prepared by the City Engineer, with reference to the L16 Dual
Forcemain Improvements, SEWER -29-002, and this report was received by the Council on March 3rd, 2026.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Feasibility Report for the L16 Dual Forcemain Improvements, SEWER -29-002, is approved.
2. The City Engineer is hereby designated to proceed with this improvement and shall prepare plans
and specifications for making such improvements.
3. The City Council shall let the contract for all or part of the improvements no later than five years
from the date of adoption of this resolution.
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 3rd
day of March 2026.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Prepared by:
City of Shakopee
485 Gorman Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
106
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.f
March 3, 2026
Authorize Final Acceptance and Payment for the Valley Crest Trail
Project
Alex Enyi, Project Coordinator
Alex Jordan, City Engineer
Action to be considered:
Adopt Resolution R2026-032, accepting work on the Valley Crest Trail Project, PR -24-004,
and authorize final payment of $1,250.16 to S.M. Hentges and Sons, Inc.
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
On August 7, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution R2024-017 accepting bids and
awarding the contract for the Valley Crest Trail Project (CIF -24-004) to S.M. Hentges and
Sons, Inc.
All of the improvements have been constructed in accordance with the contract
documents. Attached is the Certificate of Completion showing the original contract
amount of $147,962.50 with actual final costs of $125,016.00. All required project
documentation has been received and is compliant. The project will be closed out upon
issuance of final payment to S.M. Hentges and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $1,250.16.
Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution R2026-032.
Budget Impact:
The total final project amount is $125,016.00. The project is funded out of the Park
Development Fund. The following table provides a summary of the costs and funding
comparing the estimated amount based on bid award versus the final actual amounts.
107
Estimate Based on Bid Award
Final Project Costs
COSTS
Construction Costs
$ 147,962.50
$ 125,016.00
Contingency
$ 14,800
$ 0.00
Subtotal
$ 163,762.50
$ 125,016.00
E ng/Ad m i n/Lega I
$ 25,000.00
$ 40,838.00
Total Estimated Project Cost
$ 188,762.50
$ 165,854.00
FUNDING
Park Development
$ 188,762.50
$ 165,854.00
Total Funding
$ 188,762.50
$ 165,854.00
Attachments:
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION - Valley Crest Trail.pdf
Resolution_R2026-032.docx
uti o n_R2026-032. d ocx
108
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
CONTRACT NO(S): PR -24-004 DATE: February 6, 2026
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Valley Crest Trail
CONTRACTOR: S.M. Hentges and Sons Inc.
650 Quaker Avenue
Jordan, MN 55352
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT ............. .. $ 147,962.50
QUANTITY CHANGE AMOUNT ... $ -0-
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 THRU NO. 2 AMOUNT $ 5,907.50
FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 153,870.00
LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS $ 123,765.84
FINAL PAYMENT $ 1,250.16
I, hereby certify that the above described work was inspected under my direct supervision and
that, to the best of my belief and knowledge, I find that the same has been fully completed in all
respects according to the contract, together with any modifications approved by City Council.
I, therefore, recommend above specified final payment be made to the above named
Contractor.
Micah Heckman
109
RESOLUTION R2026-032
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA ACCEPTING WORK
ON THE VALLEY CREST TRAIL PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Shakopee on August 7, 2024,
S.M. Hentges and Sons, Inc., has satisfactorily completed the Valley Crest Trail Project in accordance
with such contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: The work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: The City Clerk and Mayor are hereby directed to issue
a proper order for the final payment on such contract in the amount of $1,250.16, taking the
contractor's receipt in full.
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 3rd
day of March 2026.
Matt Lehman,
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
Richard Parsons,
City Clerk
Prepared by:
City of Shakopee
485 Gorman Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
110
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.g
March 3, 2026
Accept Donation from Shakopee Youth Baseball Association, Resolution
R2026-033.
Sherry Dvorak, Recreation Programs Manager
Kelsi McNutt
Action to be considered:
Accept Donation from Shakopee Youth Baseball Association, Resolution R2026-033.
Motion Type:
Two -Thirds Vote
Background:
Shakopee Youth Baseball (SYBA) has historically taken an active approach in making
improvements or assisting in the maintenance of ballfields that are used for their levels
of play.
The windscreen on the baseball field at Green Meadows Park has reached its life -span
and needs to be replaced prior to the 2026 playing season. The cost of the new
windscreen is $3176.72. The City and SYBA will be splitting the cost of the windscreen
and will be invoiced $1588.36 separately. The City will install the new windscreen as
weather allows.
The City of Shakopee appreciates the generosity of SYBA.
Recommendation:
Accept Donation from Shakopee Youth Baseball Association, Resolution R2026-033.
Budget Impact:
The donation will help fund the new windscreen and the Parks Division will install the
new windscreen as part of normal spring time operations.
Attachments:
2026-033 Resolution Accepting Windscreen from SYBA 03032026.pdf
111
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-033
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
ACCEPTING A DONATION FROM SHAKOPEE YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION.
WHEREAS, on November 6, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5794, which
established procedure relating to the receipt of gifts and donations by the City; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 5794 specifies that donations of real property shall be
accepted by resolution of the City Council, and shall require a two-thirds majority of the Council
for acceptance; and
WHEREAS, SHAKOPEE YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION has generously assisted
in the purchase of a windscreen; and
WHEREAS, such a donation will help improve park facilities and enhance the overall
quality of like in Shakopee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the donation of the windscreen is gratefully accepted; and
FURTHER, the windscreen shall be placed in Green Meadows Park, which is consistent
with the wishes of the donor.
FURTHER, the City staff is directed to send a letter to the donor, acknowledging receipt
of the gift and expressing the appreciation of the City Council.
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held
this 3rd Day of March 2026.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Prepared by:
City of Shakopee
485 Gorman Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
112
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.h
March 3, 2026
Approve the renewal of Consumption & Display Permits for 2026.
Heidi Emerson, Deputy City Clerk
Action to be considered:
Approve the renewal of Consumption & Display permits for:
• Dilemma Brewing Co. dba Shakopee Brew Hall, 124 First Avenue East
• DropShot Pickleball LLC., 1100 Shakopee Town Square
• American Group of Hotels dba Baymont by Wyndham Shakopee, 1244 Canterbury
Road South
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
Staff has received Consumption and Display Permit renewal applications from the
following businesses for 2026:
• Dilemma Brewing Co. dba Shakopee Brew Hall, 124 First Avenue East
• DropShot Pickleball LLC., 1100 Shakopee Town Square
• American Group of Hotels dba Baymont by Wyndham Shakopee, 1244 Canterbury
Road South
The permit allows these businesses to host weddings and other events, and allows
customers to bring their own liquor on to the premises for the events.
Recommendation:
Approve the above requested motion.
Budget Impact:
N/A
Attachments:
113
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.i
March 3, 2026
Approve a Temporary liquor license for Dilemma Brewing Co. dba
Shakopee Brew Hall.
Heidi Emerson, Deputy City Clerk
Action to be considered:
Approve a temporary liquor license for Dilemma Brewing Co. dba Shakopee Brew Hall,
located at 124 First Avenue East, for the Bock Party event taking place on March 21, 2026.
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
Dilemma Brewing Co. dba Shakopee Brew Hall has submitted an application for a
temporary liquor license for the Bock Party event being held on March 21, 2026. The
event will be held on 1st Avenue between Lewis Street and Holmes Street from 12:00pm -
6:00pm.
The application is in order and the fees have been paid.
Recommendation:
Approve the above requested motion.
Budget Impact:
N/A
Attachments:
114
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.j
March 3, 2026
Approve a Special Event Permit for the Shakopee Chamber and Visitors
Bureau, and suspend city code 114.11 to allow consumption on city
streets, for the Shakopee Brew Hall Bock Party Event.
Heidi Emerson, Deputy City Clerk
Action to be considered:
Approve a Special Event Permit for the Shakopee Chamber and Visitors Bureau, and
suspend city code 114.11 to allow consumption on city streets, for the Shakopee Brew
Hall Bock Party Event being held on March 21, 2026.
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
The Shakopee Chamber of Commerce has submitted a special event application for the
Shakopee Brew Hall Bock Party event being held on March 21, 2026 from 12:00 p.m. until
6:00 p.m.
They are requesting to close First Avenue between Holmes Street and Lewis Street from
11:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m.. The road will reopen at 7:00 p.m. They are requesting six
garbage cans and four recycling cans to be placed in the event area, and road closure
barricades to be placed according to the attached map. They are also requesting approval
for four food trucks. The Bock party is a fun spring celebration of beer and community.
The event will include beer poking, food trucks, a vendor marketplace and games.
A map of the event area, as well as a map of the street closure barricade placement, is
attached for your review.
Recommendation:
Approve the above requested motion.
Budget Impact:
Staff time will be needed to drop off and pick up barricades and garbage cans, post street
closure signs and clear the street. Most of this can be accomplished during normal
working hours.
115
Attachments:
Map of the Event Area
Street Closure Map
116
CO
New metal safety barriers
6 —garbage cans
3 —Wood barricades in front of Shakopee Brewhall
36 —Pivot barriers
4 —recycling cans
6 -7 —NON pivot barriers
4 —Road Closed ahead signs
Chamber and PD/Fire should have a bar to unlock the safety barriers if needed for an emergency
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.k
March 3, 2026
Accept a Proposal from Alliant Engineering for the SS4A Safety Action
Plan Development
Alex Jordan, City Engineer
Action to be considered:
Accept a proposal and authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Alliant Engineering
for development of an SS4A Safety Action Plan.
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) established the Safe Streets and Roads for All
(SS4A) discretionary grant program. The SS4A program funds regional, local, and Tribal
initiatives through grants to prevent roadway deaths and serious injuries. The City applied
for $320,000 in federal grant funding to prepare a Comprehensive Safety Action Plan
aimed at reducing and eliminating serious -injury and fata crashes affecting all roadway
users. The goal of preparing this plan is to be proactive in reviewing the City's
transportation system to identify roadway safety issues and preparing strategies aimed at
improving safety that could be implemented in future projects.
In addition to completing the Safety Action Plan, the City requested funding as part of the
grant application to complete two supplemental planning activities. Those activities
included 1) conducting a corridor safety study along 10th Avenue between Harrison
Street and CH17; and 2) preparing a policy to assist the city in establishing the proper
traffic control at low -volume and low -speed intersections.
The City was successful in obtaining the requested grant funding and at its September 17,
2024 meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution R2024-126 accepting the US
Department of Transportation (US DoT) Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) grant award.
After over a year of delays from the Federal Government, the Grant Agreement was
approved and executed by the Federal Highway Administration on December 5, 2025.
The City followed federal procurement requirements utilizing a Qualifications -based
selection process, consistent with Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 23 Chapter
Subchapter B Part 172. The City received five proposals from qualified consultants and
119
the City's selection team ranked the proposals based on consultant's past experience,
project understanding, schedule, fee estimate and staff qualifications. Alliant
Engineering's proposal scored the highest and the selection team recommended
accepting their proposal, which identifies the scope of services and estimated cost to
complete the Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities.
Recommendation:
Accept the Proposal
Budget Impact:
Alliant's proposal to complete the SS4A Safety Action Plan is based on a not to exceed
amount of $399,952. This work will be 100% funded by the SS4A Grant ($320,000) and
MnDOT IIJA Discretionary Matching Funds ($80,000).
Attachments:
Alliant Signed - 260303_SS4A Professional Services Agreement 2026-02-26.pdf
120
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into on the 3rd day of March, 2026, between the
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, 485 Gorman Street, Shakopee, MN 55379 ("City") and ALLIANT
ENGINEERING, INC. ("Consultant").
Preliminary Statement
The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth terms and conditions for the provision of
professional services by the Consultant for the City for the following described Project:
Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning
Activities
The City and Consultant agree as follows:
1. Consultant's Services. The Consultant agrees to provide professional services
as described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work and any addenda thereto. The Consultant
shall serve as the City's professional consultant in the specified work and shall
provide consultation and advice to the City during the performance of its services.
The Consultant agrees to use the City's standard specifications in any bidding
documents prepared under this Agreement. The requirements of this section may
be waived by the City if the City Engineer determines that they are not necessary
for the successful completion of the project. A Consultant requesting a requirement
to be waived must have written authorization from the City Engineer and must be
incorporated into this agreement.
2. Time for Performance of Services. The Consultant will endeavor to perform the
services outlined in the work program within the prescribed days from the date of
the contract award. Any changes in this schedule must be approved in writing by
the City.
3. Term. The term of this Agreement will be from March 3, 2026, through December
31, 2027, the date of signature by the parties notwithstanding. This Agreement
may be extended upon the written mutual consent of the parties for such additional
period as they deem appropriate, and upon the terms and conditions as herein
stated.
4. Compensation for Services. City agrees to pay the Consultant for services as
described in Exhibit A, attached and made a part of this Agreement, which may be
amended from time to time by mutual agreement by City and Consultant. The
Consultant's hourly rates must be based on the hourly rates approved by the City.
SS4A Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities Page 1
Professional Services Agreement
121
The Agreement amount shall include all services to be rendered by the Consultant
as part of this Agreement (including all travel, living and overhead expenses
incurred by the Consultant in connection with performing the services herein)
except for special services authorized in writing by the City. The amount stipulated
shall be considered a "Not to Exceed" cost to the City.
The Consultant must keep track of the costs billable under this contract at all times;
any work in excess of the negotiated amount shall not be eligible for payment
unless preapproved. The Consultant must notify the City if the Consultant
anticipates that the negotiated amount might be exceeded, in order to determine
whether or not the City is prepared to increase the compensation. This notification
and approval must occur in advance of the work occurring to be considered for
compensation.
5. Payment of Fees. The Consultant must submit itemized bills for services provided
to the City on a monthly basis. The monthly billing must summarize the progress
of the project as certified by the Consultant. For work reimbursed on an hourly
basis, the Consultant must indicate for each employee, his or her classification,
the number of hours worked, rate of pay for each employee, a computation of
amounts due for each employee, the total amount due, the original contracted
amount, the current requested amount, and the total amount. Consultant must
verify all statements submitted for payment in compliance with Minnesota Statutes
Sections 471.38 and 471.931. For reimbursable expenses, the Consultant must
provide such documentation as reasonably required by the City. Consultant bills
submitted will be paid in the same manner as other claims made to the City.
The Consultant invoices must comply with the requirements in the City's Grant
Agreement under Fiscal Year 2024 Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant Program,
including detailed breakout of all costs incurred, including direct labor, indirect
costs, other direct costs, travel, etc.
6. Audit Disclosure. The Consultant must allow the City or its duly authorized
agents reasonable access to such of the Consultant's books and records as are
pertinent to all services provided under this Agreement.
Any reports, information, data, etc. given to, or prepared or assembled by the
Consultant under this Agreement which the City requests to be kept confidential
must not be made available to any individual or organization without the City's prior
written approval. All finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys,
drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports prepared by the Consultant will
become the property of the City upon termination of this Agreement, but Consultant
may retain copies of such documents as records of the services provided and may
reuse standard portions of such documents in the normal course of its business.
The Consultant must follow the Audit requirements as stipulated in the General
SS4A Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities Page 2
Professional Services Agreement
122
Terms and Conditions under the Fiscal Year 2024 Safe Streets and Roads for all
("SS4A") Grant Program, dated November 4, 2025.
7. Termination. Termination for Cause. This Agreement may be terminated by City
by seven day's written notice to Consultant delivered to the address written above.
Upon termination under this provision, the Consultant will be paid for services
rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination.
If, through any cause (except those reasonably beyond Consultant's control), the
Consultant shall fail to fulfill in timely and proper manner its obligations under this
Contract, or if the Consultant shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, or
stipulation of this Contract, the City shall thereupon have the right to terminate this
Contract by giving written notice to the Consultant of such termination and
specifying the effective date thereof, at least five (5) days before the effective date
of termination. In that event the Consultant shall have sixty (60) days to furnish all
finished or unfinished documents, computer programs, data, studies, surveys,
drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports or other material prepared by
the Consultant under this Contract, which shall, at the option of the City, become
its property, and the Consultant shall be entitled to receive just, equitable
compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other
materials prior to the effective date of termination.
Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall not be relieved of liability to the
City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of the Contract by
the Consultant, and the City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the
purpose of setoff until such time as the exact amount of damages due the City
from the Consultant is determined.
In the event this Contract is terminated for cause, then the City may take over and
complete the work, by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant and its sureties
shall be liable to the City for any costs over the amount of this contract thereby
occasioned by the City. In any such case the City may take possession of, and
utilize in completing the work, such materials, appliances and structures as may
be on the work site and are necessary for completion of the work. The foregoing
provisions are in addition to, and not in limitation of, any other rights which the City
may have.
Termination Not For Cause. The City may terminate this Contract at any time, with
or without cause, by giving written notice to the Consultant of such termination and
specifying the effective date thereof, at least fifteen (15) days before the effective
date of such termination. In that event, the Consultant shall have sixty (60) days
to furnish all finished or unfinished documents, computer programs, data, studies,
surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports or other material
prepared by the Consultant under this Contract, which shall, at the option of the
SS4A Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities Page 3
Professional Services Agreement
123
City, become its property. If the Contract is terminated by the City as provided in
this paragraph, the Consultant will be paid an amount which bears the same ratio
to the total compensation as the services actually performed bear to the total
services of the Consultant covered by this Contract, less payments or
compensation previously made.
8. Subcontractor. The Consultant must not enter into subcontracts for any of the
services provided for in this Agreement without the express written consent of the
City.
9. Independent Contractor. At all times and for all purposes hereunder, the
Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. No
statement herein shall be construed so as to find the Consultant an employee of
the City.
10. Assignment. Neither party will assign this Agreement, nor any interest arising
herein, without the written consent of the other party.
11. Services not Provided for. No claim for services furnished by the Consultant not
specifically provided for herein will be honored by the City.
12. Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion
hereof is, for any reason, held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary
to law, such decision will not affect the remaining provisions of the Agreement.
13. Entire Agreement. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This
Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties
relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently
in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations,
amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement will be valid
only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties unless otherwise
provided herein.
14. Compliance with Laws and Regulations. In providing services hereunder, the
Consultant must abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining
to the provision of services to be provided. Any violation will constitute a material
breach of this Agreement and entitle the City to immediately terminate this
Agreement.
15. Equal Opportunity. During the performance of this contract, the Consultant must
not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of
race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard
to public assistance, disability, or age. The Consultant must post in places
SS4A Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities Page 4
Professional Services Agreement
124
available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the
provisions of this non-discrimination clause and stating that all qualified applicants
will receive consideration for employment. The Consultant must incorporate the
foregoing requirements of this paragraph in all of its subcontracts for program
work, and will require all of its subcontractors for such work to incorporate such
requirements in all subcontracts for program work.
16. Waiver. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement
will not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement.
17. Liability and Indemnity. The Consultant must indemnify and hold harmless the
City, its employees and agents, for all claims, damages, losses, and expenses,
including, but not limited to, attorney's fees, which they may suffer or for which they
may be held liable, as a result of, and to the extent of, the negligent or wrongful
acts of the Consultant, his employees, or anyone else for whom he is legally
responsible in the performance of this Agreement.
The Consultant assumes full responsibility for relations with its subcontractors, and
must hold the City harmless and must defend and indemnify the City, its
employees and agents, for any claims, damages, losses, and expenses in any
manner caused by such subcontractors, arising out of or connected with this
contract.
18. Insurance. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant must procure and
maintain during the life of this Contract, and provide the City with a certificate of
insurance showing, the following coverage for each occurrence and in aggregate:
A. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance, including Broad Form
Property Damage, Completed Operations and Contractual Liability for limits not
less than $1,500,000 each occurrence for damages of bodily injury or death to one
or more persons and $1,500,000 each occurrence for damage to or destruction of
property.
B. Insurance coverage for Special Hazards, including but not limited to
explosion hazard, collapse hazard, underground property damage hazard,
(commonly known as XCU).
C. Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, in an amount not
less than $1,500,000 for each occurrence. Coverage shall include all owned autos,
non -owned autos, and hired autos.
D. Errors and Omissions Insurance against errors and omissions
resulting from the performance of Consultant's work under this Agreement. Said
SS4A Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities Page 5
Professional Services Agreement
125
coverage shall be in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per claim, $2,000,000
annual aggregate.
E. Workmen's Compensation insurance for all its employees as
required by the Minnesota Worker's Compensation Act.
F. The City of Shakopee must be named as "ADDITIONALLY
INSURED" on the insurance described in paragraphs A, B, and C, and must
receive 30 day written notice in the event of cancellation of any of the specified
insurance. If the deductible provisions of the Consultant's coverage or any
subcontractor's coverage is questioned by the City, the Consultant shall provide
the City, upon request, "Proof of Assets".
This policy must provide, as between the City and the Consultant, that the
Consultant's coverage shall be the primary coverage in the event of a loss. If the
Consultant is providing either architectural or engineering services, the Consultant
must also maintain during the term of this Agreement a professional liability
insurance policy with the same limits as for general liability. A certificate of
insurance on the City's approved form which verifies the existence of these
insurance coverages must be provided to the City before work under this
Agreement is begun.
19. Governing Law. This Agreement will be controlled by the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
20. Whole Agreement. This Agreement embodies the entire agreement between the
parties including all prior understanding and agreements, and may not be modified
except in writing signed by all parties. The entire agreement includes the following
documents:
® City of Shakopee Request for Proposals, dated January 9, 2026
® Addendum No. 1 to the Request for Proposals, dated January 20, 2026
® Alliant Engineering, Inc. Proposal, dated February 11, 2026
® SS4A FY24 General Terms and Conditions
® SS4A FY24 Grant Agreement between the USDOT and City of Shakopee
Executed as of the day and year first written above.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC.
By: By:
William H. Reynolds, City Administrator
Date: Its: 146
Date: 2- 2 S' /2_024c,
SS4A Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities Page 6
Professional Services Agreement
EXHIBIT A
SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL
SAFETY ACTION PLAN AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLANNING ACTIVITIES
ALLIANT ENGINEERING PROPOSAL, DATED FEBRUARY 11, 2026
SS4A Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities Page 7
Professional Services Agreement
127
13 *0 W
= Q a ~
‘ z >
‹ i_
ti) is.yO _I a a
Ili y o z
0
cm � �Z
y+w a fi
to)O 40 gt W a
ll-
N W
VIM W
J
c/i
SAP 166-589-001
PREPARED FOR:
Pliiill
SHAKOPEE
PREPARED BY:
z
J
J
February 11, 2026
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
February 11, 2026
Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
W
oc
Dear Mr. Jordan and Members of the Evaluation Committee:
Alex Jordan
'W
L I
cu
a)
-o
cu
0
cu
-o
cu
0
V
N
a)
a)
0
CI
a)
0
CU
0
C)
a
0
Ca
ca
V
W
c=a
U
co
V
Ca
0
0
CU
F-
vi
0'
.=
co
Co
a
0
0
c/)
co
co
0
Q
cr)
(/)
v)
0
N
Co
0
485 Gorman St.
O
L.)
.0
a)
cu-
-o
cu
0
O
0
to
co
co
0
co
co
E
E
.(7)
a)
a)
L)
E
O
a,
Shakopee, MN 55379
.=
-o
0
co
-o
(73
cu
U,
co
U,
V
07
U,
U,
O
Co
co
Co
O
V
cu
-o
co
C)
U,
a)
a)
0
E
0
0
u o
= _ CU c)
(1)
_ > LS)
Z
E
a)
0
o
O a) 2
co =
'— a) .vi
E CI W L
ca
co
co co
'ca
v)
co =
L
co
Co
N
0 _c
to O
+-
co a)
cu
E
CO CU
CO c/i
CU CO
N
N N
O •�
a) a
to -
V
o L
o_
a)co
co
V
O
cn v
-o V
4- CO
0) CO
co
ca 4--•
co -0
co
a) 0
0 Q
0 0.
a)
a)
-o
a) O
cu
�--+ co
0 U,
Ca
C )
caTu
0
-o
-o
To
-o
cu
co
C)
U,
0
CD
E
0
0
a)
co
4-7
to
-o
-o
0
U)
0.
U,
U-
(/)
CO
CU
CO
cn
U,
0_
a)
0
0
O
Co
cu
0
•—
Co
cu
a)
co
0
0
c�
C/')
W
0
w
LLI
U
F-
U,
Co
U,
^,
W
E
U,
0
Ca
CL
0
CU
0
CD
E
N
•0
0
O
Co
a
a"
V
CC
m
I-
a)
V
a)
U,
cu
cu
a)
E
E
0
co
vi
O
co
V
E
O
L)
Co
V
cu
co
a)
0.
.cu
V
N
0
cu
co
-o
co
cu
O
O
0
ca
0
0
co
Q
U,
co
co
612.758.3080 MAIN
O
O
cu
V
O
cu
cu
C)
co
co
E
E
F-
cn
Co
0.
0
co
cu
co
cu
co
To
a)
V
O
0
E
C)
co
co
E
V
a)
•
a a))
OOm
612.758.3099 FAX
Co
cu
U,
-o
-o
-o
-o
U,
O
N
O
0
>
E
0
CU
0
CU
U,
Co
Ca
V
.=
V
U,
0
Co
www.alliant-inc.com
O
co
E
.=
C)
.>
E
U,
a
.0
CU
Q
N
0
U,
•V
cn
CU
(/)
CO
0
CO
a'.-
0 �
ca O
V
Ca �
a)
co
> O
a) CO
-o .U,
O
E
co
ate-+
4--•
E
a)
.=
cu
Co
a)
co
-o
C)
a)
-o
co
a
E
O
4-
4-
U,
CU
V
a
O
co
0
N
co
N
.=
0
vi
J
V
0
cr)
vi
a)
V
(73
0
cu
E
VI)�
N
O
V
O
U,
ce
0
v)
vi
a)
to
N
E
a)
O
U,
U,
Co
to
co
V
vi
Co
0
0
U,
O
co
ctx
(/)
C)
co
a)
0
Co
C)
To
L.)
cu
a)
co
C)
V
0
-o
co
cu
-o
vi
E
U,
U,
U,
U,
Co
U,
cu
co
cu
-o
co
0
a)
co
vi
a
-o
co
0
N
0
co
0
Co
Co
U,
E
to
U,
a)
C)
>71
ZCU
Co
F-
Cfl
Co
C)
C)
CD -
CU
0
0
Co
eL
co
CCS
C)
0
C/)
O
co
cu
cu
cu
co
4-7
cu
O
U,
C)
U,
co
0
CU
a)
U,
U,
0
co
0
C)
co
-o
U,
a)
-o
>
O
0
co
0
co
co
C)
a)
ai
U,
a
Q
C)
.cT)
U,
cu
To
O
a)
C)
co
o_
cu
cn
O
co
0
0
•
0
c/)
2
(9
ice
F-
a)
O
Q
U,
a)
cu
co
co
U,
U,
V
.—
,_
0.
0
07
cu
O
a)
cu
O
co
.=
.U,
co
cu
0
U,
co
-o
cu
C)
0
0
-=
0
C)
Co
-o
O
co
CL
0
CU
CU
U,
E
O
U,
a)
0
0-
a)
CU
O
CO
Ca
.-
co
•0
0.
C)
a)
V
O
vi
O
0
a)
ll.cu
-o
co
a)
cu
cu
cu
4-7
C)
0
Q
Q
U,
0.
C)
co
cu
-o
E
U,
a)
0
Q
ai
0.
cu
tL
U,
U,
O
co
U,
O
v.)
0
co
0.
co
co
C)
Q
a)
0.
cu
vi
Q
a)
0
Q
•
CU
W V
0 a
o
� O
cu
= a
4- 0
O
V
O O
O
O
cX O
fzX
a
o
6')
=
O 0
O Op
o
a a
o '
O CL
o Q
(
s
o
a a
•
a)
o � o
O
•
cu cX EX.
a � a
= j O
•
cu
CU
Q
= a o
Sincerely, Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Q
s
i
m
H
Project Manager
u tburkhardt@alliant-inc.com I x.612.767.9313
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
Introduction
PR
Tim B
2
U-
a) a)
•� -2 CD U
a) >, = c(73> °'
= _ �--►
O O Q U I-
° O V
CD cCDi) E ,`�� i
}' • v) co
a) `~ O D 0 > C1) a) +-, (P
•= = v) co N O 0 > v)
-C3 CD
U CD L.)CD O)
O CD+ • •- i O O L •cn
v) CD ((I) O) () . = N
- = O v) . t
CD O a=+ L cu -O a) N N
cu O CD co }, N
.�
CD L
CO
= O) -O +-, = v) • i CD
_ •- = O O, CD a) >,
•
0 , - . N coo cu co CD co
., co 473 O 72- Q O O
L
Z O c) .O co }>—, -O v) v)
in WZ a,50C•EO=
W �F- 0)0-o = a)
CI ; -O _. = L U v)
N E N
W W CD CO a) Ni = = c
J O O = Q .7) +o N
0 _ CD cD E N
O•O O O ate) Q E
•
I O_ co a) a) - . _ T
O) a) -O
CU = •= CO
r
O a) U N
co
Q co v) N 0 rD U >
U v) Q co'—
N � O
= • N ate--+ v) a--, O) N >
LCt3 V - ate-+ = Q •— _ = = O CD U
V o o = = - n
Z CO ID
0 •a3 U Li -O =
a) = Q
-• 0
CD Q .� cD
C' O_ .UCL) `D o O ) E
Z Q ,_ •� +-� ca
-O O L v) • co
et a--, v) CD i Q
co v) CD O p O
W cn = O a) a) Q CD-
-o
�_' a L v)
LJJ = = U O O)C) = U
Z CZ M ,O .-
= L O a=.
O = L = ('D v)
V a U F- O U) co ,L a)
U
Z
W o E °W
I- Z E
E
Z Q _c U o
Qillilliliril
- :jI
a Q a)
a) v)
CD
F
0
N
(I)
CD
LEI
a)
V
v)
-o
CL
0
co
CD
a--,
`V
CO
O
Q
Q
v)
O
V)
0
V
CD
CU
co
i=
T
co
co
a)
Q
a)
a)
Q
v)
•V
cu
CL
F
0
a)
O
v)
CD
O
W
O
a)
U)
a)
U)
co
Allis
v) -
L.)
C,)
O
C/)
0
C/)
VT
CD
CL
C(.4/)
v)
O
CD
Q
O
CU
N
a)
;4=
CD
1-
4-,
O
O
v)
•—
cu
0
cu
O
'o
0
vi
cu
U)
O
N
O
CD
CD
O_
O
CAD
0
C,)
co
a)
Q
U)
C/)
Q
O
U
v)
CAD
v)
U)
co
CD
O
O
v)
a,
U)
v)
0
CL
U)
N
aio
r,
cr O
co =
2 c/)
M
M
a)
O
O
a)
co
U)
.co
a)
(i
O)
v)
a)
CD
v)
O
>
CD
O
U C,
Q
N
�
0 Ni
U (7O
17
tk
Understanding
a)
Q
a)
Q
O
co
O
O
O
ca
(/)
Q
O)
CD
CU
CU
CD
CD
CD
O
M
ate)
co
co
co
CL
CD
U
H
(ri
co
O)
Q
a)
a)
CO
(/)
O_
O
V
0
co
C/)
0
v)
CD
O
(n
CO
a)
(,)
co
C/)
co
co
co
co
U
N
O
U
co
O
CU
v)
U)
CD
•
U)
O
CU
CD
CD
(13
O)
.0
a)
O
V
O
4-1
U
N
O
Q
V
co
.E
O)
U
U
Q
v)
CL
CU
sTU
CO
(�)
O
CO
O
CU
v)
cD
CD
O
•L
.O
a=+
O
Q
•-
F
O
V
F
.O_
(/)
V).
CD
O
CO
v)
U)
4)
CO
co
O
a
a)
U)
U)
a)
co
v)
a)
a)
O
CL
CD
= I
O
v) O
J
o _c
N -a
O cD
Q �
.7).
.
L
O
Q
cD >'
U
Cn
CD
O
a) >
CL <C
CD p
&)a)
i (i)
O N
Q
=
v) U
s= Q
� O-)
O �=
Q
co
i —,
CD =
a)
O
U
CL
co Q
Cn
a--+
v)
a)•
-
U -O
C13
O CU -
CU a)
v)
O CO
O a�+
(13
E CD
co >,
o =
co U
v)
a)
(Un
CU
a)
O
co
O
co
O
a)
co
N
V
O_
O
a)
U)
ate)
Q
(i)
0
J
F
O
THE CONTEXT
Growth + Opportunity
O a) d
= co
o O .a) CL
= O O =
co O
o
v) 4-1
V
= >,O
O Q
}'
}, U U U
U CO CD ..7.,
CO CI -Oy)
..--, U CD .
O
CD v)
CD CD
= O
1_
O
O =
CD O CO N
N CL E
aj Q O Q
_o co >
s= V) a)
O O w� � a) O_
o ca
CL I.= U)
O cu
_c
a O) U
o F • 5
v) = =
To • -0
a) cu a)
CL -O O
Q U CD
co
N
cu co
p N O
= = a) =
CU co = CO
FCU = v)
+c.n-� a)
v) Q =
=
O 0 O
a,
o O_ v)
=pp F•-
p O >,
O - cu
= =
> co co -
.E - _O ,O)
= O O
E a)
a)
O v c
CU
L , }, =
'O c
L =
O
a) -O =
v) = O
a) CD v)=
0 .a) ms 's
= W
=
v) •-
O '- i CD
co
O_ O C = CD -
0 O V >,
CD >, i
-2; co
) U Q v C/ )
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
Exhibit 1. Transportation Safety Influences and Stakeholders
SAFETY STAKEHOLDERS
AND POTENTIAL ADVISORY
I'
COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
i
I'
I'
E
/'a
!-J IE 7
'' a
A,,
4 L,
. I. >
.z
,_ v, a
1' _
%` Zr
I'
I'
\jig,
= OI
fo �l
O 04
a
-z
•
•
•
a)
V
O
Cr) N _c
E V
a)
C/)
O V
a) _o
O CL
-0 co N
N
co - Q
V O
V •i _0 co
CL L CL
• • •
a
•
♦
♦
♦
•
• Scott County
O
• Major employers
• Chamber of Commerce
0_ =
o E
E
co
U
•
1.11S
I
cn
N
E
Z
LLI
w
J
Major Employer
• TZD representatives
• Elected officials
a)
Ca
V
i
CO
N E
N N
E
O
N
CO CD
N E
� O
O U
•
kik!
Regional Destinations
Parks and Open Spaces
�--� vi
ca
O N
CI) CD-
s_
C� CD -
5 ._
c
co
O 7
D �
= c/)
V
Q O
D - �
o V
< ca O
V <
U,
Ca
a)
V
0
a)
cn
.U,
co
co
CD
CO
CL
0
Q
0
CO
O
O
V
Valley Green Business Park
Minnesota River Trail
Scott West Regional Trail
10th Avenue Safety Corridor
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
CU
'= O
};
>G co
a) -
o
U • ++
>'+ i
= •>
E 0
E
O
op
V)
co
co
E
0
U
0
W
U)
c!)
co
0
CD -
co
0
CD
0
O
E
co
E
= 0 s-
Ca 0
L
O 0 a--►
E Q a)
Q U) Co s_
o a--►
TD 2 O V
4-,=
a) -0 0 (a--,
-0 CD
s_
4—
N co •— =
o - a) co
m = >,
co E .V
w a' O Q
E = o�
.-0o0)
0 = O =
�--► 0
> I
O
a--► (n
O Q Q
coo 0_ I -
c
O (n =
> N 0
a . 01
2O -0•v a)
C9 °'
0
0
0)
(/)
U)
U
F-
a)
E
E
V
(a
0
.yE
2
O
U)
O
Q
Ca
N
U)
U)
co
CD
C)
CI)
CD
CD -
co
U)
O
0
U)
s=
C)
a
S=
0
1
A
(/)
V
C)
0
co
0
aj W
E E
0
>
0
N U
W
> •—
O
Q ez
E
co
0-
O
a
F
0
O
0-
0)
.CD
!di
W
W
Ca
0
0
0
0
0)
0
a)
. >
0
0-
O U Ca
• L_ Ca = = > t/)vi
O = O O co = ._ O
0 0
L. i O V _c5 0)•> •U
O 0 0 0 co N O a--� a--+ (n . E -0 0 a)
co CL >, = 48 co (n 0 co N
Ca i
-I--' (n ca L. 5 V CO CU
CO CO Q �-_� O = (n cn N O— N N O
• cn (� Ca Q O C2 �� (n
co
ca = o Q J cD Ca o ,_ CO 0 O = 4--,, V) 0 =Ca (n .. O = 0 Q .4= `� • —
V
Q) 0 v)y)o O -O ca
co
= = O N= v N 0 F N V V) Ce Q CD
a--+
Q = (!) N ca V) CO co CO 4- 'a-), = 0 =
N .. > N — +-+ CaO s a--► =
}' '> H W v Q OU
= o
CO O
co
I..L
0
CU
F
0
4-
0-
-0
O
U)
(V
2
V
C-
LL
0
%a
•U
O
co
N
N
X
W
CHALLENGE
W
I
o_
ca
wr
cr,
_c
(/)
�CD
ca
C
o•L
cts
E
41r
. -
Cd
r -r
CD
•�, o
I- a)
as
ah)
Ca -a
E
o73rn
a
tit ifs
r
,vaiskibr -1'-`48P
pis • Tw'��
1 �a
s, (•�
Getting to Zero
.=
(n
U)
CD
V
CD
.-
N
0-
0
O
0-
0)
N
C)
m
u)
0
U)
co
CD
C)
C)
a✓
_O
Q
F
(i
a)
0_
co
v)
(/)
0
0
CD
CD
N
0
0
0-
0)
S=
U •
CD C)
U
-a v)
a) co
N U
O
a
Ca
(N o Ca -a
I = CD
}' O O
W CO u Ca
•_ -0N
0 0_
O
o — U)F
O 0)-
'ca
-
=
V •= •i
O= 0 to
= co - co_
CO O CD >,
> o L_
= U '0 0
= (/)
RH
= = O
co = 0
co
While the total
co
a) 0 O
a L o -
0) Q U 0
Planning Activities
for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplementa
co
a
O
0
Cvi
s
W
O
C)
W
0
a
E
E
E
O
co
O
O
v)
CD
O
C)
_N
N
CD
4 —
CD
v)
O
0
co
O
0
O
N
Safe Streets for All Action Plan:
0
V7
co
E
O
N
0
C)
a-+
C)
a)
O
O_
E
V
V
Q
v)
•
.-
V)
CO
C)
V
N
>
CD
v)
Required Components
C)
.=
a)
W
O_
F
0
v)
a)
CD
CD
-o
O
F
u)
F
0
O
Cl;
0_
•-
2
O
(
CN
th
CN
00
O
O
F
cD
CN
O
O
O
co
co
2
z
O
CN
O
a)
z
V
.=
L =
O O
il
O a-=+
13 CU O
co F }' O co
D
a a O , —
V co U a) O a=,
'•• •—
5
E .v co o i
E o .= ou o av)Q ) in
, , O •- cu� 2 E a' 'U)
Q= N 'v) in N O •O CD
cu o
-O N o v) To cl) '2 0 � E •
J 0 0 cD a cc3c cD Vi
co
i
O
C/)
CD
(/)
v)
O
O
cD
4-0
C=
G
0
t .L
O
0
CD
0
0
LO
0
0
0
z
la--+
i
V
a
O
W
a)
0
0
N
L
0
C)
O
C)
.=
L
v)
N
a
C)
C)
CD
0
CU
co
V
CD
O
N
v)
cD
CD
co
co
0
O
V
v)
THE ROADMAP
O7
CD
F
Safety Action Plan
CD
Q
4--,
0
Q
W
2
•
W
F
a)
co
C)
a)
a-
O
a
0
co
N
C)
O_
O
CO
(/)
(Lo
0
co
O
V
C)
E
cn
W
N
V
.-
V)
cu
V)
Li
CI
V ,
cD
>
CU
V
O
a)
u)
cn
v)
V
O
Q
F
C)
C)
V
Q
CD
CO
CD
O
V
0
a)
co
C)
l ,=
C)
co
2
F
F
O
0
0
CO
CD
(I)
v)
CD
C)
C)
->
0
0
v
0-
C)
0
0
CO
z
C)
C)
C)
(i' O
-
U N
O C)
V
CO
0
O
CO
a)
v)
a)
C)
O
co
a=+
O
F
C)
(/)
CD
CD
0_
CO
v)
COA
v1
CL;
0
F
co
O
co
CAD
O
O
CD
O
a)
O
a)
CD
O
co
0
a)
5
(A
O — a)
O1 r 'V
s CI
co vi
V CO
o — C)
ao
CN
= .
V O co
O LI) Q
a Q =
O
O
C)
tin
C)
'o
i
a
ca
cn
i
CO
O_
.=
C)
0
V
C)
co
Q
((0
H
co
an
C)
O
L
0
C)
O
O_
v)
co
0
2
V
C)
0
co
C)
'0
O7
O
F
000
EDUCATION
>-
0
F -
Q
O
F
O
CD
CO
v)
O
lL
V
O
co
0
CUD
O
v)
a=+
Q
CU
a
'CU
Q
F-
�V
C)
v)
cu
C)
Q
O
>
v)
v)
V
O
O_
O7
co
Q
co
O
O
F
O
=
(13
co
0-
0 -
CU
O
v)
O
.>
co
co
cO
O
to
C)
CO
v)
CO
i
V
0
CO
(1)
a
CO
co
O
CU
V
O
Q
0
N
O
O
C)
O
U)
CD
CD
.L
F
O
O_
.-
a)
O
v)
CO
O
O
.CO
0
CD
a
CO
0
v)
O_
Lam^
^7J
W
0
CD
C)
v)
CO
v)
CD
V
O
O
0
4--,
Q
F
O
C)
O
VT
� o
I
FUNDING AND IMPLEMENTATION
U)
V
•
CO
O
0
F
O
a)
O
0
-c'753
v)
O
F
0
O
N
O
C)
0
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
C)
O
E
E
a)
-o
ro
C)
Ca
0
a)
a)
U
a)
0
a)
a)
5
a)
CD
LI)
0
Ca
U
.=
-o
E
O
U
Co
a)
a)
a)
0
O
co
0
Ca
4--►
a)
-o
Q
E
Ca
CD
Q
F-
u)
a)
co
v)
a)
-o
a)
CD
E
O
V)
U
a)
co
0_
CD -
a)
a)
Q
O
CD
CD
0
> To
a)
U
o
a)
Q
Q
v)
.=
E
E
O
co
>
-o
a)
0
a)
C V
a)
a)
E
a)
vi
a)
CD
O
co
a)
co
V
v)
O
a)
-o
CD
a)
-o
CD
U
a)
O
O
CO
O
a)
a)
a)
Ca
a)
Q
V
0_
O
4--,
O
U
O
a)
v)
a)
E
5
J
v)
CD
a)
a)
a)
C/)
. >
CD
CD
a)
Q
Q
a)
4--,
a)
>
a)
0
-o
X
a)
co
(13
a)
a)
co
0_
a)
O
Ti)
co
O
Q
a)
co
co
a)
E
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
v)
E
O
CD
NG STAKEHOLDER AND
I
w
W
I
z
V)
VEN ANALYS
0
I
0
W
V
0
I
z
S
S
0
V
0 = =
ID Q
Ca
Q U scu
O ca
E
0 U
4 O
Co
co 0
U Ca
- 0
.� O
cct
N
N _a
a) L
}, > N
V1 O .�
cc) Erp-
- _a
= -O
O (1)
0_CO
a) O t—
co
TO •= .v) CU •
U
W
N N U
- a)4-0 -
1 -
Co
CO a)
E7:3 _c--,
co Co = C . =
U
V 0 V) W
a)^,
CO -O
CU -.-•
4-, v) Q U —
CO = CO"O O O
= U
CO _
OU '� '§
N E v) }+ �=
> 'v) -a
N N =
CD Ca Ca
O F- 0
CU>' =
av)
= co U
O }, co
o co
C) co
v) O >
== = W -
Co CO 0
U = 0
v) N
T V =
a) 0
,_v1 = —0
E- N 0 E co
V)(/) C
0 = O a)
= •. U
E - -0 = v)
O a) CD v) U
0 co = V 0
4--' O = Q
a) co v) ..,=, Ca
Co }, c N = .=
a) O eL = '= }' =
co co
F O O .> 0_
a)
0
0
CO
N
0
a)
O
CD
0
Q
0
Ca
v)
CD
a)
CD
0
Q
0
.-
0
CD
0
C)
O
a)
0)
.—
v)
•—
U
O
Q
co
a)
W
co
C)
a)
C)
E
O
a)
Q
co
(/)
a)
-o
co
a)
4--,
a)
Q
a)
v)
a)
a)
V
Q
a)
a)
co
N
a)
O
.O
V_
a)
0
a)
v)
Exhibit 4. Data Visualization Example
NG FOR FUNDING
z
z
a
co
G)
o_
cn
as a
V
i
O5
�13
a�
i N
ca
co U
O
= L
> C?)
L
Q
a)
0
V
O
a)
co
a)
a)
(73
Q
0
co
r
O
Q
Local Roadways
All Roadways
C)
to
a)
a_
a)
CO
a)
Ca
a)
0
L
0
CD -
Q
CO
♦�=
0
C)
a)
Q
o
N
0
CO
U
0
(I)
0
CU
•
v�
N
0
Q
O
v)
0
0
co
.ca
ca
co
LI)
v)
Ca
N
v)
ca
ca
O
a)
a)
O
E
CD
cc
CD
J
O
(�
0
O
cc
0
(!)
a)
LE
vi
ca
a)
a)
C)
CD
O
co
a
0
5
m
a)
a)
CD
E
Q
E
a
0
a)
X
W
0
ti)
v)
co
.(7)
a)
co
co
•U
0
•
CD
E
a)
C/)
CO
CO
a)
CD
0
C)
.CO
Q
4--+
a)
v)
E
O
U
a)
o_
CD
1-
O
a)
v)
a)
vi
a)
E
a)
.=
a)
a)
a)
v)
a)
co
co
co
a)
0
SingLe Veh Run OH Rd 2%
.
Edina Safe and Equitable Mobility Action Pla(i6EMAg
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
H
Z
Q
J
J
Q
‘1
Exhibit 5. Approach to Maximizing Future Grant Opportunities
1
Alliant Approach During Planning
Common Criteria
Safety Impaciii._ Clearly communicate safety needs and priorities using data and engagement input.
o
a)
co
a)
a_
VC
a)
.0
0
co
v)
0
a)
TD
a)
co
v)
co
v)
a)
a)
.=
E
E
a)
co
0)
LLI
0
co
a)
E
a)
0
._
a)
E
CD
CO
O1
Maintain focus on safety impacts and improvements for non -motorized users.
To
0
.E
++
2
a)
>
co
a)
v)
v)
a)
a)
co
v)
co
co
a)
a)
0
E
>
v)
O
co
0
a)
coc
a)
=
a)
a)
co
E
Create well -designed and easy to read plan that complies with federal SS4A requirements.
Safety Plan
v)
a)
TD
a)
co
v)
i
a)
t
v)
a)
•v
O)
cz
+,
co
0
Cc
0
0
4—
v)
+-.
v)
a)
co
v)
v)
v
O
0
a)
E
vi
i
a)
co
V Co
O
M O
Collaboration
4--,
Co
i
0)
4--►
= .
V
a)
O
a)
0
a)
v)
0
0)
=
23
v)
a)
0
o
co
a)
a)
V
O
a)
vi
O
Co
.0
co
G)
E
V G)
O aw
V 0
2
W
I
in
tn
>-
U -
Q
W
i-
0
z
NCORPORAT
APPROACH
Co
E
Co
O
0
ca
0)
V)
0
co
0
co
v)
can
()
V
co
i
0
a
0
to
v)
co
a)
a)
—
0)
.N
.=
0
V
CC
a)
co
co
CO
0
01
.7)
v,
Cl.)
co
0
ia)0
E
co
"
t T
01
(73
F-
0
JO
(/)
a)
0
E
v)
can
(/)
a)
0
co
a)
a)
co
Ca
v)
co
a)
.E
co
a)
v)
co
E
4--,
co
Ce
W
I
CO
0
I—
› -
CL
CL
a
I
E
co
a)
a)
.E
.=
.E
-o
Co
v)
a)
v)
co
a)
a)
92
a_
a)
co
a
O
0
O
a)
co
LLI
l-
0)
E
co
a)
a)
a)
0
a)
0
V
0
0
v,
v)
co
a)
Cl.)
0
0
0
co
c�
i =
a) 0
CD
CO E
E
}, O
U
N
0
O V
Q
V
O Ca
Ca
co -0
v) =
CD
= A
Ca
ww c
v)
E a)
Ca _
aa--+
)
-.--,Ca
0 0
co
Q
a)
a)
23
a)
= .
U,
(an
co
CI)
v)
co
to
a)
c...)
E
a)
v)
a)
co
(n
a)
E
O
>
a)
a)
co
v,
co
v)
o
co
V
.=
E
E
V
0
0
4--,
a)
V
i
0
O
v)
co
a)
co
a)
O
Co
a)
E
i
a)
a)
u
co
a)
co
a)
co
0
O
`^'[ 1
W
vi
i
a)
co
0
.=
a--,
i
0
O
co
co
a)
a)
co
co
o
v)
co
a) .
0
0
z
Q
J
CI -
z
ORITIES AND A COMPELL
CLEAR PR
>
O
>
a)
o
a)
>
a)
O
a)
a)
Q
a)
a)
E'
.v)
0
0_
co
a)
a)
V
a)
co
v)
co
Q
Q
v)
.=
a)
0
co
v)
a)
co
V
o
co
a_
a)
co
4--,
a)
a)
v)
a)
CO
a)
>
^
W
O
V
co
i
a_
co
a)
0
CU
a)
a)
o_
a)
a)
co
v)
a)
a--,
.O,
0
co
0
0
G)
= .
.co
a)
co
0)
o_
ci
v)
a)
a)
co
v)
co
4--,
a)
E
E
0
a)
0
E
a)
v)
U)
O
co
i
o
a_
v)
co
r)
a_
Io
v I
o)
Q
E
V
co
a)
u
CU
0_
0
co
0
a)
co
.a)
a)
Co
v)
co
0
a)
_a)
a)
O
0
0
0
0)
.=
i
0
E
E
0
a)
.=
v)
0
0
co
v)
a)
CD
co
tv)
0
v)
0
v)
V
(
L
0)
23
v)
a)
O
U,
co
Co
co23
a)
F-
U
co
a)
a)
a)
a)
co
0
co
co
.=
a
v)
a)
O
I
0
O
Q
0
v,
._
a)
Ca
CD
v)
co
I
v)
v)
V
0
Q
0
23
.0
a
Co
v)
a)
CD
a)
co
v)
0
i
0
v)
a)
23
CL)
a)
.a
v)
0
=
co
V
.=
E
0
co
Co
23
a)
E
v)
>
.=
co
Ci
co
E
Co
0
co
a)
v)
a)
a)
01
co
.=
E
E
O
a)
co
v)
0
V
co
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
H
Z
Q
J
J
Q
0
Work Plan and Schedule
-)
CC
o
o
co >
_c},
a)
..-,_
a)
> 0_
.3 =
CO
0_
0
co co
o_ v)
�_ -0
0 a)
O O
cu O
Ii
II
MI
L
_
O co( 4"
a) 0
tn
tn 73
Q1
0_
._ 41)
0 CZ
V
=
0
V IA _
v)V OJo
++
— >, ,„.13
. u_ ._ O O 7 = E
= a >+ E
— 0 O
O •= V
O O
a cc
0
000
1 1
0
ca
E
i 0
O al
• a o
=a
.0
47,
J
A N
= O .a)
E
. En
a) E +•+
a) eL Ca
cn
_
4/) p .
W C
co _ U
t/) V
0
0 tu
1N1A1EV9N] 31l9ld
o)
.0
a)
Cr
v)
v)
co
0
co
0
Q
ca
0
CU
(13
E
v)
to
.13
W
vi
a)
co
and integration.
TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
s
m
E
i=
0)
co
co
a
'0
ct
0
a+
co
0
LP=
(i)
01
(13
CD
2
O
'0
L
a
a)
'O
Q
a)
0
CD
V)
a)
co
.=
E
E
co
a)
C�a
.co
E
co
-I-,
v)
cm
a)
a)
v)
CD
v)
0,
co
a)
'oeL
a)
a)
o)
0
o)
co
co
a)
v)
a)
0
a)
'0
0
a)
a)
0)
co
co
a)
•
v)
a)
.E
O
co
a)
co
0
0_
co
0
•co
o
v)
co
O
a)
E
co
a)
C/')
D
a)
a)
.0
E
co
>
•ca
0
CU
(13
(J')
N
O
NI
Ca
(.1)
U-
a)
a)
v)
0
U
co
E
i-
co
a)
a)
I
Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Grant Program.
0
V = = a)
ro
_aa) . _ co 0_
� = =
N O a)
U To •—
= u =
}' = N
'5 0 I-
= = vi a)
a) cu 0
�-0 CU _c
I-- c c.n''a)
2 co
�--- = 0ro
a 0)a cn
E '(n w -
F .5 v
= a) +�-+ a) a) CD 73E .
o > C >
T Q
O
En Q = v)
-.--► = (1)
2 2 0 a '�
- O_ =
v co = Ca
O 0 = v)
a a = ro a a
N75
N
-0 Q 0_ co
co
4 -
CD
CZ
0_
ca
a)
o
O
Q
a)
co
co
0
v)
v)
a)
0)
o_
v)
a)
'o
.—
0
F
F
(i)
F
F-
a
�V
0
_
>+
S•+
0
2
M
co
0
a)
o_
0
4-
a
'0
Q
O
a)
co
a)
a)
cu
o
v)
v)
o
o_
a)
U)
a)
V_
'0
U)
CD
i
o
a)
O
co
a)
a)
La
a
'0
0
O
0)
a)
co
E
0_
0_
V
co
a)
Ca
v)
co
a)
O
0
0_
a)
o
a)
a)
F
a)
co
o)
co
a)
Q
a)
CT
a)
a)
o
v) =
(aa co
v)
Ito
-
C ca
E =
an
CD =
= co
CU
N
•a)
co
0 o
_
co 'E
O F
ca O
tc V
co
O 0,
V a)
v)
(13 CU
I- =
0
.a)
a)
>
0
0 _C
F
0
co
a)
a)
o
v)
co
vi
a)
co
a)
.>
0
v)
v)
a)
V•_
> E
a) ca
a)
4--'
co _c
4-
a3 O
v) i
= CD
Q
(/) v)
N �
a) F
o co
0 a)
F v)
T co
0 v)
a)-0
F a)
(3) a)
O) ≥
ca a)
a-0
F .(
TASK 1 DELIVERABLES
v)
To ' vi
(n ca
a) 6/5'
a) (On
i— a) o_
co a
La a)
0 v 0
._ ci-
i
• Weekly PM status meetings
• Action Log (updated monthly)
a)
a)
a)
o
LE
(r)
a)
.=
ro
v)
v)
v)
a)
0
Q
co
CU
V_
'0
= .
0
•
v)
0_
a)
a)
a)
O
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
L. d.)
O •�
0
a O i
O
CU
.� E )
Qlb O
O O
O a a
0
4... 0 (1)
a o
V) -ni�
O 0 ,O
LL ,� O0
a-C)
O SU
CD a a
P AND GOAL SETT
TASK 2. LEADERSH
O
V O O
a'.... Ti
Cl)L. -C,, i
- o
fa.- E
a, 0 a L
rg
-r
N O
O co '13
_c
..--+ = -0 = O
— Cl) 0 =
O)o Q .4= ra
Cl) O
OL L j = Q
= U > Cl)Co
}' W
> = �--, '
U 0 0) ca -
O V '5 }' O
�--' co > a)
a) a) = O- _
72 E N ci, >
_ •� a--,
•5 0 •=_ a -0
V v) }, =
H 'co
o_ O =
i= E
O v) a) E
ala) v) = =
CO -0 -0 0 =
= co = U
CFI a) co L to
i J v) a) ca
.5ca
+r p
CCD O
O O ca -0
.E o 0 5
'=
O Q co = Q
V O O —o0
a)
s a) a) 0
ti)U)7:3 N Cl) <C
O O Cn
_.
•=
O Cl)a)
ca a)
Oco
r O Ea)
O Q .2 v) _0
O
0
a)
U
co
O
.=
a)
cCa
Q
a)
cO
O
O
0)
ca
a)
^Q
W
Q
a)
O
0)
U
a)
'0
Q
O7
0
0
a)
a)
'o
O
vi
O7
N
E
0
ctc
E
F
O
a)
a)
a)
0
0
ro
to
N
S
O
(1)
(13
co
i
U)
O
i
W
N
N
activities and milestones:
U
co
0
a)
O
d)
Q
O
v)
Ca
O
a)
a)
a)
v)
O
0
(i)
0
F
v)
CU
v)
.�
CU
O
0_
a)
a)
(73
CD
F
0,
a)
a)
.>
a)
O v)
— a)
•L
U •O
Q
a)
U
O
0_
U
0_
co
0
Z
i
.=
O)
co
>
0
tca
a)
CD
a)
F
0_
Q
O
Q
a)
co
T)
a
Q
0
N
Q
a)
o_
'4c7)
a)
X
0
0
a)
co
a)
co
U)
a)
0
N
Q
Draft plan, recommended projects, strategies, policies; performance
measures
OOOO
a)
O
O
a)
Q
a)
O
a)
F
v)
a)
v)
O
v)
O
a
F
0
Q
a)
a)
a
TD
a)
CD
v)
O
O
O
Q
a)
a)
0
F
U
.-
0
Ca
co
v) N
a)
= =
O =
= O
H
Leadership Commitment(Safety Goat
CITY OF EDINA, MN
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-53
= a)
Ca U
O O in
O•=
.O ca
= =
Ocm E
0 U = =
U O O v)
O = v
O o
F o -,
o Q a)co
Q o c
} o a)
>,
O (1)
=
v) L_ § vi
ca =
v) a) U 0)
co
' �
v) co
o
i = 0) co
Q N .E •L
= N N -i--,
a)
•— ,_ O co
-0 F
a) a -o
=
a)co
N ' O W v)
v) co m 0)
t LU a)
0)a)
a) s 0) w U
0 •O <
T co 0 =
a) a) v? , o
= }' =
E- . F co
E
0
o .y
K
:�
'E n o
m U
U
, ,:' 2: 41 ,;) It o m o 0
N o
..5"
M') g O E
O ~
c' o
o
'3
how
1
cH M`,' 0 :::
w i y
O
T
Edina Safe and Equitable Mobility Action PIa(SEMAI
z
4
a
TASK 4. SAFETY ANALYS
TASK 2 DELIVERABLES
v)
CD
a)
0.
a)
Q
E
V
V
S
0
lL
a)
• Leadership Commitment Language (draft and final)
co
U
0
0
Ca
co
Q
v)
0
a)
a)
a)
co
0)
v)
a)
O
co
0
ca
0_
coC
cn
co
U
O
U
O
a)
-o
ro
aJ
co
0
co
0
a)
a)
co
co
U
v)
v)
co
0
CD
co
CU
ca
0
ro
co
0)
CU
CU
co
CU
a)
0
co
CU
U)
0
0
a)
cu
CD
U
0
2
a)
a)
ca
a)
a)
et
a)
121
N
cLa
a)
U)
O
N
CU
0
a)
U
F
v)
0
2
O
co
a
0)
ca
2
a)
co
a)
a)
a)
0
CD
.=
v)
co
0
Ca
0
cO
U
>
.=
ca
co
cO
0
0
CD
a)
co
co
co
CD
Ca
a)
v)
CU
CD
O
Q
ca
Q
0
U
0
0
o Q Q = •= -0
Q o 01 O
= CIO = L �--�
-o a) o) •—
'- U
Ocu
Ca �= Q Q
Q U = _cX
O L
= a--+ w
c = O O a
}, '
O Q v p •Q =
v)W .o La Q v) E
To
Ce u v)
• a) 0E
0 = Q = co E O
rd
~ 0) _a F
= O
co M co a) Ca L =
CU CO
0) > =a)
a) U
O +_' -a = > a)
O 0 N L
N }' OLCL) E N
ca
— Q }, F
•zi
V L +� = O -0
N v) co L U ca
45 >, Q -0 N O
L O
V _c 0) -,-- ==
CI 2 M 0 0) - .>
O a)
•-
0 ..=, N 0 Q 0 :5;
= c a CU —C3
• co ._ CO
are listed on Exhibit 1.
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
DELIVERABLES
V)
co
co
co
V
Q
CD
O
O
>
CD
(I)
C9
co
0
CD
E
2
co
a)
cn
co
0)
0
O
>
(13
co
co
O
V)
co
U
•
co
co
co
0
CU
a) O
a Q.�
CU Ca.
a)
E'
v)
E
O
Vi
0
CO
ENGAGEMENT AND COLLABORAT
is;
I
cu
0
Q
O
V
O
O`
co
E
ca
a
O
E
01
0)
W
•V
a
LI)
CL
CU
0
CU
CD
0
4-1
CAD
U
O0
-+
0
O1
(13
s
0
CL
0
CO
v)
V
O
Q
a)
a)
CCD
0)
co
v)
Q
O
0_
a)
W
CL
0
0_
O
a)
co
O)
w
V)
0
o -
O7
O
O
O
.�
V
Q
CU
O
Q
O
U)
Q
co
a)
PHASE 1: DISCOVER
-o
-o
N
a)
eL
>
co c,..
v) 0)
v) .�
•->' N
= co
L
cD
O =
a)
4-1
a) L�
CO a)
Q
_C O
Q
•
(n
aJ i a)
N .� O � O
O O a)
L � }, V L
=O cu a) E v) >, O
15 i -F0) '4E =>' 2 7:5 c co
L L .� L > �a) CD
O O, V = a) >, V)
,g 2 ci) = =
O .= N V) —
p ' ±C2 cn v)O - 7 co
Z o oco (n 0 o V
= a--' = O = - .v) N O
.E a) (5 -0 4--' V) L
0 = a) CDCU > a) a)
I CU 0 O) .7?) -C) La 1 2 -o° 2
N = cl = z `f) 'L
O _ U a) co 0 =
CD co -a . — V V co
PHASE 2: DEVELOP
0)
O
V
0
.>
co
co
v)
V
O
Q
a)
.L
CD
V)
V)
a)
F-
cD
O
Q
V
0
CD
0
0
V)
a)
O
Q
co
v)
N
co
0
O
V)
cn
CD
N
CU
CU
0
CD
Q
>
O
co
O
N
co
V)
v)
O
CD
O
•O
0
vi
CU
TD
co
CD
0
Q
-o
O
co
a)
U)
a='
0_
co
PHASE 3: DOCUMENT
N
O
CD
U
4--'
a)
0
1-
CD -
O
Q
CO
O
0
O
a)
co
CD
O
O
E
0
4-1
CL
V)
V)
^L
W
V
0
0_
CD
Q
CO
0)
E
V)
O
co
a)
Q
a)
V)
a)
V
CD
V
0_
v)
E
0
CO
a)
V
W
0 -
CL)
F-
ai v)
c
O O a) N
E
0 V
COca--'
'i a) V) V)
... a) +O-' O' = a) >j
c L .= _O Q Q a--'
O a) O E E Z
. (/) V)
O N - .N V)
V) V) O O v
zvi
co vi E > . =
= V N V) CO O7 O
N .- O
v) coCD
E ca 4, `=0 -
CD = --= O = L
§ O V) = a)
V CD V O 72 =
v)
N To V 0 O
4-1 coco
..--+ O co -CCO CD
3
-0 1_ -a V) O
_
t+ — = 0) co = =
O +L-+ a) •§
t/) O L
u) .v)=— ,,,E
0 Q I- N
"
0 (..) g C.)
Cr •Oco O O -C32 N
},
}' V) U Q a) V)tea')
cD O o O o =
i U CD U = =
V L a) - . N CD 0 co
V
O 0 O .() (.)cD -- v V) =
ICI: LUX Li) a .1.) a z-1 ----r
•
CD
a)
O
0)
Q
U)
a)
O
U)
LE
to
O
Q
a)
U)
0
0
O
CD
CU
cu
0_
cu
v)
E
CD
0)
CD
a-
111
O
a)
o_
N
O
ca
}' V �v) v)
-3
V v) a)
o
E v) —O = E
aco O U O a) E
_C a) �= .V v)
. V) = _c7) co
U >''
a,E,L =
co— = L Q
V N VCD O co E
,
- — O 0) OV
,
Q O U a) L o
CO � CO V) CU
0) Q O co co O O
V) V 4�-' V) Q _>
= V .=
0 >�
CD V }, = L ( ) L 0
U =
Q O_. F a) O O O
Ca V = a) ci)= O }' a) E
}+ ,— 0 , T O
i U
L -O = Vi
O a--+
773 _Clr° CU co a) (DE
a) co o' Q }' a)
_ co CD 4,
0)
W CD = W CO >1 ' > =
.O 0 U > C UV
V) a--' ---' =.= t=5)
'� L 0cri O = co a)
cu - O
.,-0 L
O V OV > • a)
p •N O p o=
4-+ Q C a--, L 4-,O
�
cD -0 V v L
, a) .N a)
N - O
a a a °) �� = v) .cu co co
o_
CO
4--►
CU
4-1
a)
.-
v)
a)
O
U)
U)
can
co
V
co
V
O
V
Q
O
U)
U)
U)
a)
co
O-'
O
V
Q
4--'
la
CD
O
Q
a)
V)
co
cu
(/)
O
a)
a)
a)
U)
a)
a)
v1
O
CD
v)
cn
U)
tCO
O
N
7_
O
CL)
cD
cu
U)
a)
O
U
0
U)
a
V
co
.a)
O
O
2
co
.>
0)
0)
O
co
O
U
.a)
x
Z
O
Q
cUi)
a
V I
a)
CD
O
V
co
O
CD
cUi)
Q
a)
co
v)
V
0)
4--'
CU
V
cX)
to
Q
cn
V
Q
Co
CU
(n
0
CO
0
a=+
co
co
CU
O
O)
E
i
)
CD
U)
CD
V)
4-1
V)
cD
U)
aaa))
Q
CL
Ico
a)
E
E
a)
O_
V)
V)
V)
CD
V
i
O
to
CD
CU
0
CU
0
0)
Q
N
a)
cu
a)
V)
U)
V
N
U)
CU
vi
CO
0
,CU
CD
v I
V)
0_
v)
CU
0
U)
v)
V)
CO
CU
a)
cu
O
CO
a)
Q
Q
a)
a)
0
co
CU
CO
Q
U)
CO
0
t/)
co
a)
(n
N
Q
a--'
CU
.>
O
ca
O
a='
CD
E
O
0
0
V)
co
a)
Q
a)
E
Q
a)
V
a))
0
U)
0
L.)
CU
Cr)
M
O
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
CO
4--,
CD
CD
O
CU
CD
U
a)
a_
a)
co
co
O
a)
N
O_
O
O
0-
T
CAD
v)
(1)
O-
O -
5
N
W
O
M
LS)
•
a)
co
co
-o
a_
co
cu
0
(7
N
O
co
4--,
CO
Q
a)
a_
a)
0
CO
O
CU
O
O
a
a
E
0
4--,
co
4--,
a)
0
CD
C)
CU
o_
co
a)
v)
0
a)
Q
CD
co
.CD
ra
E
E
E
cn
W
L!i
>,
E
0
N
O
4--,
Q
0
a)
co
N
O
Q
Q
0
CD
w
V
W
N
E
v)
^V`
W
a)
co
0
Q
V1
Q
.=
CU
O
ci)
v)
CD
0
CU
CO
0-
•
C)
O
cu
Q
0
co
O
O
a_
v)
Q)
Q
a)
cu
v) .
- V
>
F • .(0
co T
C O
= -O
^O a)
a) a)
O ▪ O
• U
> CL
-O v)
O
co
Q 0
CO La
O
O ca
= (/)
O
N '>
�--' N
O �
O
0
a_
O
U
0
O
O
co
co
.O
>
co
0
Q
i
CO
O
v)
O
V
O
CD
co
co
F
4--,
a)
F
O
V
a)
U
cu
co
O
Q
a)
>
i
vi
a)
a)
cu
y)
co
Q
>
•V
d)
0
F
O
O
a)
CD
V
co
F
v)
i
O
V
O
ce
U-
O
CD
O
V
a
CU
a
cD
N
V)
4--►
CU
CU
CD
Q
a)
0
a)
a)
co
a)
F
O
V
O
CD
vi
a)
U
O
U
a_
cu
cu
CD
a,
0
a_
CD
.v)
co
.=
U
F
(Oi)
a_
O
Q
CU
.N
CO
0
a
a,
U)
0
O
Q
0
a
N
LS)
•
TASK 5 DELIVERABLES
CD
0-
0
V)
O
a)
CO
4)
O
V)
V)
U
O
Q
.=
CO
CU
O
O
i
Ca
• Public Events and Materials
CL
CU
a)
CD
C)
U
•
N
CD
O
Ca
CU -
V
U
CD
v)
v)
•—
0
O
O
O
CO
a)
O
a_
• Engagement Summary
cu
CD
m
co
O
J
a)
'0
•
CD
a)
O_
co
v)
0
co
0
• L
O
Q
O
N
Q
a)
a)
.=
a a))
0
ca
co
2
F
O
LI,
0
•
a)
Q
O
.>
a)
O
Q
CU
O
a)
Q
co
co
a)
2
vi
V
O
O
a -
DERATIONS
Z
O
U
I
O
W
I
O
Q
-o
O
O
O
O
cu
a)
a_
a)
U
.=
o_
a
0
.>
a_
0
C)
co
N
a)
s
i
0
a)
O
LL
W
M
M
LSD
•
a)
C)
v)
co
CAD
0
ci)
V
O
a_
N
O
a)
(n
i
4--,
Co
O
a_
a-
co
cu
N
O
(Li)
a)
CD
N
0
co
C)
N
co
i
a)
ate-+
v)
N
a)
.(
C)
O
U
O
a-
co
a)
a)
(Li)
O
0
N
CD
>
0
co
O
CD
C)
aa))
a)
0
Q
O
O7
CD
v)
-o
a)
v)
Q
0
Q
O
a)
v)
co
CO
v)
a)
CD
M
M
U)
CD
M
U)
a)
a)
CD
C)
a)
To
CD
CD
O
0
N
.CD
O
CD
O
CO
a)
•
0
CD
F
F
vi
O
O
a-
•
r
00
CO
O
N
.O
17
v)
a)
O
Q
vi
F
O
O
co
W
u)
co
F
O
0
C)
O
v)
a)
0
v)
co
N
O
v)
CD
.U)
a
0
:'a
CL
CL
a)
i
a)
to
vi
a)
U
co
0
d)
Q
Q
a)
th
a
co
N
.co
ca
2
M
U)
•
V
4--,
v)
c▪ o
co
F
a)
O
U
V
CD
V
0
CU
v)
a)
U
CD
O
co
C)
O
C)
vi
co
N
v)
V
CD
O
F
O
U
O
0
co
O
0
co
-a
;4
=
v)
a
a)
a-
Q
v)
O
0
CO
a)
v)
Q
O
U
O
O
O
v)
C)
()
Q
a)
co
co
C_D
V
O
a)
v)
CU
O
N
vi
O
CD
Q
O
U
a)
vi
Q
vi
co
vi
v)
a)
O
F
O
a-
co
CD
v)
O
ro
v)
>
O
Q
U
a-
O
C)
O
v)
V
a)
•0
a-
F
O
a)
C)
.N
co
O
a)
V
CD
0
.cu
Co
Q
Q
a)
vi
O
0
Q
co
O •0
CD
O
O
a)
.>
Q
CD
.=
v)
U
a)
Ll.L
CD
CU
CD
.(7)
a)
.(7)
N
O
a)
V1
O
CD
V
Co
cu
z
• •
s
a) 73
`l) kJ
a
o
O 1• 1
O
t,)
h
= 0
a �
O
a • i
o
szu
Q a
Q
CD
a)
cu
v)
co
O
co
a_
co
u)
0
V
O
co
CD
C)
a)
.L
O
CD
N
Z2
X
W
(7)
co
Co
a)
t4
ca
Q
O
CD
a)
N
N
to
a)
Tu
Q
O
a)
co
O
E
E
V
a)
N
C
0
Lc;
i
.=
C)
O
.=
v)
0
CO
O
O
O
O_
CD
co
a)
CD
0
CU
CD
a)
c)-)
co
F
F
O
a)
L.)
0
CD
O
(I)
O
O
co
a)
v)
O
CD
Q
Q
CO
O
O
U
O
CU
O
V.
co
cu
O
O
Q
O
CD
ca
W
O
(13
a)
F-
v)
co
v)
v)
CD
U
CD
F
0
F
F
O
a)
0
.a)
Q
N
O
vi
•O
a-
co
LI)
a)
0
v)
F
a
O
Ca
v)
ci)
O
co
CD
0
CO
N
v)
LI)
V
O
a-
O
N
,O
Q
a)
O
U)
co
C)
a)
a)
a)
O O
C
co co
C)
a) •§
a) a)
o
a) COO
a
C U)
L ^ - `
0
O
4--' a)
a)
a) Q•
U v1
a) O
= cc
CD V
_v) O
a)
a)
O
Q
F
co
U
O
u)
O
co
v)
co
0
O
C)
C)
0
O
.=
O
CD
F
0
.=
v)
a)
co
O
O
U
.=
a)
CD
a)
co
0
a)
CO
U
a)
.O
Q
0
C)
Q
C)
CD
a)
a)
vi
U
O
Q
O
N
.00D-
TASK 6 DELIVERABLES
V
a)
a_
a)
O
co
a)
O
0
a)
• Vulnerable Population Analysis and Interactive Webmap
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
Exhibit 7. Example Social Vulnerability Interactive Webmap
CY AND PROCESS CHANGES
TASK 7. POL
m > U)() o
v) U a CD CD a--'
— < CD
•� > a) V E to =
U = a)
o_ a) -
> 0 >O •- C vi Q
Q CD v) V , V • —
M N p E MC) O m CL 0 0
= .. = Q O
- 0
'T< U 0
Q v) N CO — �-+ CD 0
0 w •N UCI) Cl CI) !E
o U 0 v) N >,
> w . C Q
o a) }' '- •— cn E U
wE
a‘.))'-'n -05= - }►
O O >, v) L) . CD C51 =
O CD= cu = O , .= CD
(n cl
= v) p L CU V
= >, = Y)-- •= = `� co v)
}, +-+
i >; . V �--' ate-+
QCL co N,_ O_ = v)
a->'+ �-=+ Q 0 = j N
+_+ N cD N 0 E' O
O O 0- >, ca = O= E v)
v) U= }' O 0 0 E v)
0 U O E U=
Q �--' O V
'>j 0--.-. co
- v') V, a) .- .�
�--' = O v)
= L_ v) U U
N -0 = - -0U Q
0 0 0= 0-0 a; = a
}, CD -0 U p
o CO CU co CD = = = . . -0
O CO co =
O
CL
(n
V
CD
0
0
a)
0)
0
0
0
0
0
F-
TASK 7 DELIVERABLES
• Policy and Process Review and Recommendation Memo
Exhibit 8. Example Alliant Approach to Policy and Process Review
Consideration
E
C 5
= O O C C 1, ul I
pq 5, 7 L t r4 RS E C +� MI b4
r0 � � CI. 4J v,
MiNclWqtitn
QJ
r6 _
�
a L223
am +
C C GJ
4+I t O i
' r C O .01cr;.2 ?. .7%
r0 O
t ;wEpeS
C C
2 40
;;"Ig
in
01
E
Li
O
O
in +a vi
Z — tn
0 to
0 co
il
U =
V °2' .O a)
LLI a)
CO -0
LJJ p cl co
aN-+ =
0 =
V a) = E
W a) 0 E 0 0
N a-='
�, > CUD -0
0N 0 o
L v' a) E N a)
a a) 0, •—
cD >, _�
—
O >0'a) 0 0
LA a) CD O
O to
a — = 4—'
��� U
CD Q al N
cD
_ =
W COCO _ =
O U
>j Q a) N 0
> = 0 O
4/A _CO
= E
O fa v) a 0
0 CO c cci •=o co
— =
w he
O .2 u o
v) O
co in V >, }' J a)
• I 2 (D o 00 In
ad tin
C �
W U
i
2
CL
0
0
N
0
U'
0)
0)
Ca
CCD
a)
0
U)
0
a)
U
o
o_.5
zmO
=(75
o_
V
-0 O
CC5 7:5
Q CO
U N
= =
� 0
O
a)
u
g O
E
O
U U'
=
W 0
CO U
O 0
m
V
=
v)
o O
co V
a --r
v)
ca
a)
U'
co
vi
_
v)
U)
to
CD
CD
U'
CD
V
a)
E
E
U
CD
O
0)
0
l�U)
U)
0
U'
U)
>
0
E
v)
U'
U
O
0
0
N
0
F-
N
CD
CD
0
v)
0
0
0
a
.=
0
0
CD
U)
CVD
E
0
a)
O
O
E
0
U'
0)
N
E
0
W
0)
vi
U'
U)
0
0)
0
V
ca
U
=
V
4-1
ca
=
U)
E
O
O
(As
U)
E
N
U'
0
a)
0)
E
U)
07
0
O
.O
ca
E
O
0
U)
CD
CD
0
E
a,
E
Cll
CO
V) v) = O
(1)0) : 0_
0) o = a
'Q O p
> F- (4 §
a)
.. a)
-oC = N
O o
U N cE o
co
0 V)
CD
Q U' = O
CO > 0 -o
a)
U
a) — co cD
CD N U 2 •
co ..--' O =
_ O 8 N
v)
4— 0
V� _C0
CD
0 O
•— = �--' =
al 0 co co
CD
a a o —
t7) CO > Q
_a a)
a - z
M al . W— — F
cn o - z
N `~ V)
CO a
00 v v Q
0)
N
CD
gyp-+
0
CD
V
U)
CD
U'
(/)
CD
U
v)
Q
U'
CDD
0
N
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
TASK 8 DELIVERABLES
O
Ca
0
0
0
Ca
.0
co
O
CU
ro
C/)
O
O
O
C)
O
O
• Concept Development
• Prioritization Technical
O
O
V
a)
W
a)
N
0
v)
co
.>
O
Q
0
V
a)
cn
•
ca
O
a)
O
c_a
To
V
a)
>
O
co
a,
LL
•
Memorandum
V
E
O
O
Ca
N
a)
W
O
v)
E
co
0
co TD
O
V
0
CD
O
C)
2
C)
•L
co
E
O
N
.C)
a -a
CD
4--►
4--►
4--►
CU
v)
C)
E
O
O
CD
O
•L
,O
O_
>
C/)
C)
co
O
^L
O
co
co
i
a,
Q
O
O
}►
N
O
O
co
Q
O
>
O
co
V
co
O
O
O
i
'
V
O
'O
O
C)
l.=
a,
N
v7
CU
0
Ci)
a)
co
TASK 9. PROGRESS AND TRANSPARENCY
>
L)
C o 2 al `3
,
ca
>, = },
co a) a) N V
O Q c Ca ca
L
N -0 V •> O 0
Cn
CU O •
00 •� CU O
E _O _c v)
co ,_ca > L a,
-OO V v) O
Q =o co cu v).O C
O Qom--+ ' L
a).= �' o �
� 4---+ _ (�J) L 0 Cl.)
`~ .- ca - v) =
•� O= N E •>
O = O =
CO
co = _C Q
EN=O Q N ca
in o_
ca co C)
tz QToL W — =
.CD
E ,V o V O
t. V
>a, 0
= E- a, = co O
O
ca a) U
V V ca E co
Q co }' co =
O ca c/) 4_„a) a, O
To co
L
CL_c
O }, N Q N
L o -O
CU = = = =
O co S ._ co co
(LW CU /) C/)
V O
O C)
^
vi
> = V
a = �o
ca v) O Q
CU
co co
�--+
c V caCD_c CD_
, CU
v) 0 co L a)
CU NV
V o, > O
= 'ca =
V
C/) = co }' ► -O
CO V ) O
i},
CO O c)
V O O- co
= _ O
co 4_ o
= CU =
O O a3 CU
o ca LE a) ca
o V a) -O =
N -O 0
-0 v) u v)
co N
O vi
v) _c N 4-
V - v)_
Ca T
.> =
= =
O O N Ca O
ca vi •-ca
�7:3
4-a= -O O =
O = a=-► a)
CD E ca u E
o E a)= E
O O 0 o O
O
_Ea) _a E a)
v)
TD
i
CD
v)
O
CO
4Caa
v)
U
O
0
4-,
a,
ca
N
U)
H
L)
Ca
O
0
ca
F
v1
,O
CD -
ca)
u_
a)
E
a)
a)
aa))
c0
.-
C/)
co
co
U
0
C)
F
v)
v)
O
t/)
a,
N
O
0
CU
cll
vi
^V`
W
O
O
a,
a,
0
4--+
U
O
C)
Q
C)
a)
co
a)
Q
N
co
E
H
O
Q
N
V
C/)
C/)
O
Ca
L)
0
co
O7
co
a,
O
co
O
O
scU
O
O
�Caa
Ca
V
C)
0
C)
O
_
O
0
co
F
O
V
co
F
O
O
co
v)
O
O
TASK 9 DELIVERABLES
O
O
V
ca
v)
O
,Ca
v I
V
a,
0
co
L �
C� cn
c�a
O �
W o_
o O E
< o
cn
4 -
CO
co LI)
• Performance Measures Technical Memorandum and Reporting Template
ON PLAN REPORT
TASK 10. ACT
a
a) O O
E
O a)
V F
E
co v)
}, E
V
V a)
'O
.= el co
a) \
X N E
co _N N N
_a a,
co
V
a) . -a — O 0L W
�-a
V — >,
C/) v) O7
CO CD W
}►
co
VN F �--�
co
(�i
C O a,
Q =
0 O =
ca LL
,V fa
2 O
V: -O >
(1)
_ co -O
D C O
= E o
LL O =
Cr _O _
00 O §
a)
ca
o ._ O N
V = a--+ vi
-O O ca
T = co .V
co
V O va)
)
co O
= co _cV O -O
Q � O_ a) a)
co co
O V
v)•3 a,O a)
4-aO v) a)
= = - Ca -O
O_ O -
cQr) ^V
0
-
4-a _0
O = - =
Q ca ca Q
CD C2L V = N
ca o_ a)
N -o
Q � � o =
L
> O
a--► co
O ca +-v) N i
Ca . V ca
v) = a F
a) L L ca F
4-1
a) a) C) cLi)
•V O
Q� O a O >
O a) Ca a)
cn co X
O O O N
�� o_ E V a)
o_ a,
v) E
co O-
CU
Q
CD
co
v)
ca
Cll
O
ca
ca
.V
C)
vi
F
v)
V
O
a,
l.=
=
C1)
0 -
CD
V)
L
O
C/)
a,
CD
v)
4-
O
O
O_
C)
,O
CD -
W
E
co
x
W
is
V
•L
2
co
a
ai
1O-
L L
s
C
0.
.N
a)
O
0
C)
a)
Co
U
C)
Q
to
V
0
F
O
V
co
CU
.>
N
O
O
O
Q
CD
co
a)
co
N
0-
a
a,
C)
O
V
CD
0
Q
O
CO
N
v)
C)
0 -
ca
CD
C/)
U
1-
O
0-
v)
N CG
a,
(7)
to
ro
C)
O_
C)
a)
co
C)
Q
O
ca
N
v
V
U
O
0 -
CO
1-
O
V
a)
a)
5
a)
CD
O
O
V
.=
O
CU
4--+
CN
a,
N
O
N
N
.=
O
T
N
C)
V)
o
a
CD
O C)
to ca
N (.1)
= L
C) O
O
>,
V
a) co (I)
L
Q
co
- =
Ca
O O
L
= O
co },
N L
'� =
co
O cI)
C) 0
co CU
a
C =
N ca
V
v) N
O
c� O
a
N
-o
c
T L C)
ca .c° U
o D_0
O
0) Z a) Q
2 _ 2
((s . �
o L 1 E
c �\ 0 W Q
> Z 2 2 s
a) a� a) cn
S
o LO 0 0 co 0-
o 0 o 0 -0 2
-0c 1)
Ia) w
Z °
O o O 7,2 ri
7y, f '2 *)' -`)'
:t( )
o, = O3:E°
Z 0) _co
) _amu°)) S con 2 a) con
c4
ca>_ C)- ca ac
0)
0CD 0Z 0_ 0 u)
U)
C
a)
E
o
Z N 0
2 'C C)
Oz
I O ce z
> I d
O
Roadway segments in proximity to schools .
O
E
'T<
ain
U) I U z
E a)
cl)++
L L L = K
W 2 N 2 N Es Cp C
i.y g.NLJ c0 2 U U E U
TASK 10 DELIVERABLES
co
V
V
a,
V
.=
O_
CQ/)
4-1
L
O
CO
0
O
Q
CD
)
co
CD
•
N
CCi
•U
0
a)
((S
a)
a)
(n
co
a))
(a
a)
() .
E2
w
• Executive Summary
• Report addressing the requirements of 24112(g) — (h) of the IIJA
N
M
%-
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
I-
Z
Q
J
J
Q
0
which intersections or locations would benefit from additional vehicle and
in
TASK 11. 10TH AVENUE SAFETY ANALYS
O 0 -o
0 =
CU CO
•§ o L
0
CD Q7
CO a) 0
• i
> O
co In O
N •§ )
_O
CD
O =
v)
L
v) CD
= -0 0
0 co a=-►
_c V
vi O
N = L
O =
o O •-
E a -o
O
CO O
+_, Q =
= v)
= v)
0 co co
O
vis
4_, a)
CD
= -0
O CD ate)
= .> a)
co -0 Q
"= O L)
V) V V
C O 0
co
V
V)
ro
2
CU
L
0
L
co
a)
cu
Q
I
a)
J
0
V)
co
a)
Q
0
U
V)
N
V)
CO
LJJ
a)
O
co
L)
0
o
(I)
co
cu
Li]
N
a)
I)
co
CD
-I--,
CD
CU
t��
T
O
0
-=
a--,
U
>
cu
v)
-o
a)
0
0
U
Z.
V
V)
a)
2
v)
a)
cu
eL
co
L)
-o
CD
L
0
N
U
0)
.=
L
CO
J
>
CD
uJJ
o
i
LS)
-o
a)
-o
>
co
L
0
cu
J=
F-
vi
a)
.E
co
J=
co
v)
a)
V)
O
(O
co
a)
o
L
o
O
J=
4--,
J=
a--,
al
.=
.a)
CO
i
O
++
Ca
W
CC
a)
E
o.
a)
a)
CI
G)
Q
M
r
L)
T
CO
-=
v)
a)
.v)
v)
0
co.
v)
CU
cu
CO
CL)
E
v)
0
cu
E
cu
.=
CO
CO
0
a)
(7
V
co
-I--,
(/)
.V)
V)
Q
0) .
cu
cu
0
v)
a)
O
-o
.►
a)
-o
cO
0)
CD
A
V)
vi
U
co.
V
V
La
co .
v)
a)
a)
U
co
v)
CO
vi
N
Q
V)
v)
E
O
7
v)
N
co
E.
-a
-a
co
v)
v)
a)
cO
4--,
v)
N
CO
CU
CD
4--,
-o
Q
cu
Q
co
a)
E
0
LJ_
O
N
0
coA
co
co
a)
0
a)
ca
a)
a)
co
._
a)
co
O
LI)
4--,
i=
T
CU
CO
0)
CD
CD
o
a--+
CU
0
>
.CU
0
0
co
Ni
7-
,0
Q
= =
E E
s >
L.
= O
L- Q
- .E
co L
= -0
0 •�
L
co O
co co
a) c
a-" a)
= O
E 4-
Q 0
o
a)
a)
-a
CU
-I--,
L
L
0
v)
>
}►
cc
CD
O
cu
V)
a)
O
LI)
co
a)
o
•-
co
v)
0
cu
L
Q
cu
F-
4-
L -
0
(/)
0
CO
a)
v)
0
0)
.=
0
coA
cu
0
a)
a)
>
0
Q
0
CO
a) U O
,
L }
CO = 0 s =
a--, L
U V) = = ra
Q E a) ca 0
a) c a) .. Z a--►
.a) > v)
= N O 0 ,0 •J,
• a) O Q V }► CO
V
Qom,- V) = =
L
0 `
a) 0 cD O
0 v) = Q) L)
0 TLS ^,
L.) a) O =
O 0 CO E > .-
= -,--,
v)
L
0
s-
0
4-
0
Q
CU
=
V
•-
v)
a--,
co
a)
co
co
v)
vi
0
co
Q
co
v) =
= a)
O
V .
LI) ID
0 v) V
= = =
.- O
O co cn
> -a 'v)
a) c o
O
CU P
+-, E O
0 O o
v o 0
ro
(3
a) = •=
ro Q .(13
.--,
v) _=
> = co
E
.--, v)
= O O
L
0 4-
CD •— a)
i
o E
= O N
O = 0
V Q
0 v) •—
Q a)
= •—
to •§
_c
+_, O
.§ L 0
V -0
v)
•
-• —
U
O O O
U
CD a)
= -0
L
�0-, V
co 0c
v) a) :§ -0
c _ CO co
a-+
Q a)
ri
0 0 �
V
� �� =o a)
O (7). .= = _ =
o a) a
V s o
,� co Q
c fD = T
+-, —0 O 0 O 0
O 0 CO CO Q O .O
J� Q
o) :(7) O _c +-,
�,a),=__N a)
V CD •E 0 O Q
p cn ; cn N `— E
LS) To 00 -0 0
Q N L_ = N CD V
QO 0 O OW >,
N N
= N .O a) LI) E
O
v)
co
v)
0
CI)
CD -
0
Q
F-
vi
0)
._
a)
47,
2
-45
ID
C
E
ca
a)
ca
2
U)
co
i—
‘7,
r
r
a)
O
CD
CD
V)
U
0
CD
0
0
U
L
01
CU
1-
1-
0
0
Q
0
CU
>
0
Q
a--►
V)
CO
0
N
= .
N
V
4_,
v)
0
U
CU
L
CU
-0
0
0
a)
v)
cu
J=
a)
CO
a)
L
CD
o
V
L)
V
co
v) .
0
Q
L
O
E
v)
CO
Li
—
CO
I —
CC
V)
ia)
T
7
v)
o
co
v)
co
a)
OT
O
V)
N
N
O
CV
4--►
U
}►
()
0
CI)
L
CD
0
+_,
U
V)
4--►
a)
L
(/)
a)
Q
O
a)
}►
a)
E
0
co
.a)
a)
-I-,
.>
v)
a)
a)
E
0
CD
L
0
U
CU
4-1
a)
L
(!)
v)
a)
i
.0
v)
co
0
E
a)
CD
eL
>
CU
V)
CU
J=
0
l.T
T
COA
v)
0
U
tt_ V)
T
CO
V)
U
L
V - a) V) cu
.O
co CD -a O Q CD
LO 0 .= •_
co 0 — a) —
..--, u co O . Q) }' a)
>, '� a) ..—L 5 E
N V) = v) .=E cu
N
Q) a=+ V O CO O
O) •> 0 = CO = L
_ O
CO ' N >,4-,�, O Q
a) 01 CO N
Q L a=, C CO =
}, CD -0 V CD m CO
CI) s_'" -I-' CO . _ Q Q
U
O O
V
O = c 0 a,--+ j) = _ Q)
Q O V 0 O 0 v E O
_ Q Q
.� O aN-+ O •p > -0
a--,
CO v) = - Q O2 (n
O L co = L — > N 'a
O 0 Q N 0
�--+ L
Q v) _ L = v Q
O Q CD O= 0 = O
O U)
N a=, }'
a+ CO N E V CU COE .� N
_ P 0
42) v) }; }, 0 a V
E - = = 0 .— 0
= a) '_ co 043W -Ci
O CD
W..-. v) v) v) - O E
L co V L L
._t.) O `� p Q =
= V a) V Q)
La et
u
• p L = a) a) —
(}!) Q I = Q ._ 4�-,
U
.a
0
cm
0
0
ci)
• Status of 10th Avenue CIP project (scope and timing)
CO
V)
0
U
.CO
4--,
v)
Q
CO
CU
U
a)
0
a)
0
co
co
co
C(3
L
4— CD
V)
0
c1:3 CU
J Q
•
• Updated safety understanding from Task 4
* Of the projects in the SRTS Design Assistance Study,
■ Which would provide the most safety benefit? Which are most urgent?
v)
0
CU
CD
E
a)
L
0
coA
O
E
a)
Q
.E
V
= .
4--,
U
•0
L
CL
W
L
0
CU
CD
.=
U
0)
4 —
CO
0
Q
CD
V)
U
.O
1-
0-
s_
J=
O
Co
0
0
V
a) .
E
01
N
aI--, O
= T
O a--'
L a)
O .-
U �, Cn )
L v)
= 0
O U •C
v)
�—>' E (1)
V —
(7 L a--+
E a) 0 CD
0 s_ CCT (i (}.)
= =
C
CO
s-
0
E
a)
E
coU
.=
V
0
co
+-,
V)
a)
cu
V
0
.CD
0
U
CU
775
U
V)
V
0
v)
a)
. _
0 O 79 a)
v 0 a)
= O 0 }►
a) Q •,,
v) W co
> a) = Q
.0 v) a) c)
a) }' o a) v)
O '>, v)
CO
>, ' CD ,-,
cu F O
CO
}' v) = 0 CD
O = v)
0 •o w) .L L
v) w 0 O
^a) -
W
CD = +I-, O a)
Cr 0 =
v v) c O
co = a)E _c a)
— >
• • O O
DELIVERABLES
l -
VT
Q
11.2 Data Collection and Issue Identification. Given the short timeframe of
CO
V) CD
O O
CO
E co
= �=
V
v) a)
= N =
O
2 co
V
= E
CO N
CU
0 LI)
U V)
= =
CO CD
0) =
0
w a)
2 o
‘0..=
U co
V co
O
• •
CD
0
CO
4_,
U
a)
0
U
0
Q
0
CO
.v)
(!)
V
CD
V)
.7)
V)
Q
.w
O
v)
0) .
4-
CD
CO
v)
N
CU
J=
0
>
0
5
CO
Q
v)
CO
0
U
U
4 —
CO
L
F
0
=
a)
F
T
0
cu
J=
co
CU
0
CU
v)
CO
CO
V)
U
_0
V)
U
V)
O
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
vi
O ' O }, co
- V = — -
= = - = = v) = p N
CI) 0 O a) co = }, = N
E O co O a) �--+ +>>+ -0 v) OV , V , v)
O O cO E' L }+ 0) E }, t/)
U — O co = = = = O
a) L �--' ' i aI--, +� a) E a) O
L O O OU = Q t_n E E a)
>, •— U O co co O N O N
E
U N ce Q a=, N L U 0 _=
N 0) N L = O
Q a--, Q O ,� }' lO. - > co O ff, •c - V c E a)-5 O CD_, O
}, W p a) = (1 ) L U }, CO Vr, —
O �, N Q >, v) ca ate) ' X 0) co
O O a--, Cl.) =
E U — o +-, a) . E = V = CU ., i
N •�_ — U _ a) O 0 Q 0 cn >
a) •a) N •V L 0 = 'x O
•— = 0- co >, O
CO >, }, E N N N _ ca O
•� ca OE O co •O '§ V)
N ._ O >, >
cc
a) Cl.) •� '= V1 O� N �> 'v) O o > U
= N O U
= x ,0 T Q 0 0 = O V
CO
>j V V CD Q >, CD
a) U
ca ca o_ CO COc� a) v Q ) — o
cn
0 .O a = -0
o o L.),� Ca ≥ E _C=
V ,--' 0 Q CU U a) a) c J w• V
(/) >,-, = L U E 0 = L = . co L.LJ E — ca O
La Q -I— 0 a) = >, U a) = a) > =
Q _0•= -=— U — co V
CD
01 §V = Q cu
_
O > - = CD .5 co can J CC V=
L CU - CO CUI-. — CC Q •
0,
E = U
= -o=
•—
= i v)
Ca O W
O E
E a) v)
To U
UCO
•= v)
.=
U
a)
o a)
co
ca O -o
> L Q
w Q 25
-o E E
co -o >
= CO V
Q.) v) co
Ei U N
CL a)
•
O p •—
> -0 Co
l a) a)
> O a) -
ca
= 0) E co
L 0 -o
Q w = U
® • ! !
unsafe speeds and crashes
Z
0
NTERSECT
CY UPDATE
0
a
CONTROL
0
v)
.=
co
*=
O
Q
co
a
0
V
0_
CO
U
CD
.-
a)
O
Ca
V)
U
0
CO
cn
CO
a)
V
cu
cu
0
0
T
CD
U
Q
•
0
a)
>
0
c
0,
.a
O
CU
CU
vi
(13
a)
E
O
N
O
a)
O
Q
•O
0-
0)
Q
0
0-
23
v)
0
CU
5 E
o
o O '
to • a)
c (CS +�
t -a co
Q Ca
—1 M Q
�CU
_V v)
—
_ 4-
_ CD
ca i
— v)
= O
0 U
0 U 1
1- 0 •�
= =
. +-+ U0
§ v0)a-=+
Ca
aa)-
to 0
a) O _ E
a) O Ca
i 0 L
ca a) 0
a) L E
E o
W L
0) ca O
= - Q
(a 1 0
to CU c1:5
O
L
v) 0 -
CL)
U,
cu
F-
O
Ca
O
0)
E
Ca
CL
0
a
0
co
v)
0,
0
O
CD
0
0
0
0
0
0_
0
E
vi v)
>, =
o =
co
corov)coo -o
z
a)
= v7:3)o
CO
Q -o co
= E — O L v) O
0 O U O U
ca co 0) 0 O
' o
-0 a) ,v) V = I }+
co Q N Q v) a).
a)
N = Q
O >,
ca = a) a=+ }, o_
j O La -cica
= 2 _= O U 0 N
o O U = O = 0
- E •_ v) = O O
(Douro o U co
— v)
a--+
0V
O v •0 N p co
-o
a--� (13 i V =
- CD _O L .=CD_ a) V
ca . — 4--,
+I = .2 V §
-45 0 > a) — -0
Co •a O 7.T3
T
a 0 .en -0 o o a)
O = CD v) 0
C U -o O N
V . a co E .0
O U a- E co =
O 0 .
0 E }' _
cu a) U a) TL) o=
w) .— L
o
U '§ o > _ co� (
N L ca
- ._ 0
cOn
0)
0
0
U
ai23
CU
v)
0)
CD
U
0
0
0
O 0
O 0-
ci )
0
O O
a
O
aJ
a) 0
(1)
O �
a
0
(,)Q.
t
O a) U co
+-► O vi a)=- 0 O L U
= 0 =_ o v)
i a) }, vj (-) • = (/) . — L_
0 L U N F
aO-+ U, co CO U v) _ = CD
N = = ca 0_
'� '� = H O U 0 v)
0 — = N '.7.,-0 ca 0 v)
=01 7:3a) > 0 a) CO '._ U
_ C v) = O L Q O co
ca cD (I)= M — 0 co L
= O O � L
_ = o ' — E a--, +-,
++ '� O O ca '= a) O
W = = = 4--, 1_
U .-1CD
CD O Ca U a to
w }, '= = O = O
. cn O O W O a) O a--�
V
01 E�-_� �-_�
co O •_ 0 N= N ci)U,
c0 >, '>G - 0 - 0 .—
_ .v o +� = o) = >
O —_ E z a) a) O W
E °- co> o ff=}, • =
co > 4_ }' >,
v)
o �--+ N = N }, = co
O O = U O v) N v)
cu > ca Q = O .—Li) •O
0-0 0 0 '- w 0 } = co
V O > O
o a) a) a)
O U O cn > _�
a U V CD CO 0 E
M = U 'j ca co 0
(Si 1 O N CD J
+� - a- 0 a) 0
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
U,
a)
C0
w
I
N
a)
O
O
0_
It
N V) CD -
01 -0
=
=a)a
E V
•O
a) O O
22
N
a) co
CD (1)
= CD
cD
J U)
a)
E
U "
Q
NO
-o
co =
J LL
I.'
E
a)
co -a
CD — • J
N c/)
O O
O
c/1
•—
3 O O E
a)
o)U,U Woo
co 0oO-0U�
CO��oc=a
V
'0 ~ oO CD
O 0 F-
N M
deliverables is shown in
O
172
X
LJJ
DELIVERABLES
LLI
0
U
J✓ J✓
i i
a) a)
-0 -0
CD CD
J J
N nj
ca
L
9-
a) coE
CL CO
Q
� N
O
N
0)
a)
a)
CL
- CO
V
a a) =
a)
0
cD-o N O 0) E
a_m Q) O =•u E
a) -O Q)=00= E
= cD
N cD = > -0 >- —
Cn O ' O (13 N
O) � O,
J Q, a) N () E
w +� LC) = Cr) • CD a)
V Q L O
O O O
-C) •O
Q CL fD
0_0_ DOD2OLL
lig • •
1
= O•L V a)
fD ) CO E
N
L
an ' =0' o E
a) -0 ;0'uU E
E O = Oes =
O)p4 = cnZ p-
�J �N > V0� L N
= >w oN = E
LL _ _, LL 0_0 LL (Dv) a)
• s Q 5 a--'
CLOOO0_Lu 0 L
(Ni M M M M M •
L!i Ln L!i Lti L 6 L f i L!) L!n
Q
E
_o
E
N
to tO
a) =
E Q
ca
-0 o
ca 0
O
O X ca
O
V 0
0 CD
CD
•a o
I— tea)
O }' N
a=+ (n
ra
N � Q
v) 0
Li
E
N N Q
a) O
,
•o N > CD
o_Epp
Q
O > a) .
CVD = =
J(CZ,
Uu
Co CO CO
0)
0)
E
O
O
• O
ce
a
V
a
O
7 .._.
N
N E co
a) 2
a) U, =
E O co co
•
o =
-• 2 E
CD N = E co a)
o -0
= a E = U
CO = O t) CD a)
V) V) >, - cn i-
0)N—tea 0)
CO
s-alN cD O Q
2 = �v)� 2=
= 0I- o = U
O V = = O
+� N N N N a-=. O
cD— ≥ E CO CL
=0_ =-
0 a = 0) E 0 0
O +� O OV O =
o co -tea)
UDQuice UU
=0
O 0 a)
C
�=
cn F > >
LL
(3)
a) o 0.6
E -
o = •
oes a) E
N
a) - O O) a)
0)V N CD 0
= a) a) =a)
O E
� L).0 E
V) L -
a) : 8ca CD }' = o
D Q CL
N t:2
) L()
r r r
U,
O)
a
0.6
0)
CD
CD
U,
r
I
Q
0
U
0
V
U,
N
O
CD
E
a)
0_
a)
E
O
a)
V
CL
M
r
CO = c4 = cfl � O (O V L c4 v) cfl O N }' O
N N O N CD N v) i_ N-0= N a) N= N }, (V N cD Nil
N
a+ CO 0 • N a) o V N � • i . O OO V LSi N O aVj O Cn (n c4
N- p N N ,_ N N 00 N (N to 0 N a) E cD E N (N
}' a) a) cfl C9 >'� o o cD oo a a� •a) x a) a) Ni a) CNI CO Cr)
a) p) co }, o U -a a) L 2
-.—o E.L 'E cop },
uMwN Li LO �Ucfl0�co >E co >oco Na)cfl ~cfl �o���� ��N ��
L LF- N - N_- CV a V (V .LF- N }, N 0 C N= U (N L a) Q N
V O O O N -ID N O O p a) cfl > LSj O O 'xi
cfj 4 = c9 (13 LL (6 00 00 p N N M
U = J CDco
Q CO V
W
LL
w
J
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
KEY PERSONNEL
a)
O
O
O
V)
a)
O
.a)
O
CO
CO
a)
O
O
V
0
X
(13
.CO
cu
1'C
15
V
U)
W =
O
"ra
15
= V
0
S. 71
Clg Ale
a)
a,
a)
0
a)
co
E
v)
a)
O
H
Exhibit 11. Organization Chart
m Burkhardt, AICP, MPH, Project Manager
Alex Jordan
CO
ca
a)
co
O
O
CD
0
0
a
Q
(.1)
E
H
City of Shakopee
O
a)
0
O
a)
0
a
E
V
a)
a)
a
0
a)
N
cD
ate--+
a)
O
E
vi
a)
(13
CO
0
a)
.=
a)
ca
co
0
a=+
ate-+
O
CD
Tim Burkhardt, AICP, MPH
He is an active listener who uses structured decision maki
O )
a)
co
V)
co
O
a)
a)
V)
O
cD E
27 E
0
a)
—o
—o
O
cD
()
O
*V
a)
a)
c.)
a)
.0
a)
co
co
z
Q
O
SAFETY ACTION
O
CD
O
cn
CD
To
O
E
E
a)
V
.=
co
-o
co
a)
O
O
a)
a)
a)
CD
a)
co
co
v)
co
a)
E
O
Tu
a)
v)
a)
a=+
co
i
CT)
cD
.a)
i
a)
O
a)
E
V)
a)
co
O
co
O
co
0
O
CD
a)
cD
CD -
Community Engagemer�
0
0
a)
CO
v0)
CO
a,
0
(%)
CD
a)
a)
co
cu
V
O
O
0
co
V
O
a)
a)
co
cCD
a)
V)
LE
a)
t!)
LE
O
V
E
F-
O
CD
E
V
To
a)
a)
CO
a)
0
a)
a)
a)
a)
a_
a)
a,
.=
cD
Q
O
co
Q
CD
O
co
a)
co
0
co
0
a,
co
a)
Tim Burkhardt, AICP, MPH
-C •V
CO >
O) =
= CO
Cn
= O
CD
V �
ca a
0
CZ;
cn
CO
V
.=
a)
Q
.=
co
a,
co
a)
a)
O
a)
ro
0
O
Danny Ogranovich
Megan Flaherty
a)
.O cD
O
��
o f
UD
a C
co Q
�
J
N co
o)
2
N
cD
s_ a)
E
a)
= Q
(13 E
co
= -a
iii (
o co
>
)<
}
O
O
U
cD
s7)_ cD
Q O
C/) Q
a)
cD
O
co
E a)
Safety Analysis and Strategy
cn
CD
rO
O
(.3
a)
E
F-
co
CD
co
C/)
CD
a)
a)
CD
.7
to
0
co
w
W
0
O
-a
co
N
2
Mitch Coffman, AICP T
a)
Z)
♦T
O
a)
co
CO
a)
Q
a)
Q
O
CD
0)
co
a)
.a)
N
CD
a-�
co
Tom Natwick, PE T
CO
W
ca
O
V
i,
O
a)
ce
CO
O
CO
c,
O
.a)
0
a)
to
0
CD
a_
co
Eric Francen, PE
vi
O
co
.a_
CO
O
w
c/)
Ryan Roth, EIT
Nick Grage, PE, PTOE, RSP1
RELEVANT PROJECTS
a)
a)
co
co
a)
a)
0
a-
a
•L-75
2
CC
•
a)
2
V
a)
'0
a-
v
O
O
CD
a
0
0
•
Hannah Johnson, AICP, Lead
L
a)
co
co
a)
O
ct
a)
a)
O
a_
O
CD
a
a)
U)
ca
a)
V
co
a)
CD
N
N
N
N
N
N
•
Low Volume Intersection
10th Ave Safety Analysis
a)
CO
co
a)
•O
a-
V
0
0
V
Q
a
0
0
ca
,0
51
a)
N
•
L
co
V
a)
.a)
a
a)
O
i
CD
a
4-
N
CD
V
•
Hannah Johnson, AICP
a)
a)
ro
co
a)
.O
a
v
0
0
0
a)
•
Danny Ogranovich
co
a)
co
a
a)
co
a)
W
a)
a
a)
a
a)
E
O
Q
E
a)
N
Co
•
Eric Francen, PE
Cam Valuch, PE
Ryan Roth, EIT
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
Jackie Haugdahl, Engagement Lead
a)
V)
U,
Co
Q
v)
0
a=+
V
E
0
a)
a)
CC
cu
0)
to
co
O
V
CU
CO
Co
Q
0
0
O
0_
co
co
O
O
v)
co
cu
a
a)
Co
a=+
F
0
V
0)
.co
U,
(n
F
Co
a)
v)
a)
cu
O
L1)
vi
0
a=+
Co
V
F
0
0
to
0
V
0
a)
0)
co
Q
0
Co
a)
0
V
a)
0
N
U,
a)
v)
LE
O
co
a)
vi
L.)
O
0
Q
L
co
a)
co
F
Co
v)
v)
a)
vi
a)
v)
a)
a)
ca
'V
0
a- )
0
a)
V
O
co
a)
U)
0
v)
co
V
Q
a
co
O
CO
cu
a)
O
T
cu
0
0
Q
U)
O)
a)
F
0
Q
0)
co
Q
U)
V
a)
V
a)
F
0
a)
cn
F
0
V
a)
J
Ca
v)
a)
.co
O
0
a-+
a
0
0
0
a
co
V
v)
Co
Q
cu
co
a)
Ca
a)
co
O
Co
Q
>
cu
0)
v)
0
v)
a)
a)
CD
0)
a)
co
v)
co
co
(/)'
a)
V
O
Q
co
co
cn
a'
Co
Q
co
co
co
CD
a)
0
co
0
U)
co
V
a)
O
v)
a)
0)
co
v)
U)
F
co
cu
0
O
F
0
Q
0
cn
a)
Co
co
U)
Co
0
a)
a)
Ca
>,
F
0
co
co
V
0)
RELEVANT PROJECTS
RELEVANT PROJECTS
a
a)
co
LLI •W
V
O
O
ca
ca
W
•
co
(n
co
Q
cu
co
L/)
Lcd
a
0
O
cu
ca
Nom')
•
v)
0
Co
V
F
F
0
Co
Co
J
0
co
a)
a
0
'c
r)
a)
Co
.a)
O
a)
62)
a
0
cu
cu
V
•
0
V
0
0
cu
E
0
E
0
o
i •V
to
a� E
aO
U
-0
L!i ca
fX
E
Lfl O
Z a'
O)
W
•
V
O
'0
O
•c-3
O
a
0
co
Q
co
0
i
to
•
a)
F
cu
0)
co
0)
W
0
a
0
a
0
i
0
V
ea
O
m
V
0
•
a)
0)
co
co
V
O
•
0
CL
•
O
•(.3
A
C)
E
0
E
4-
N
C)
O
a
C)
to
•
Danny Ogranovich, Planning and Engagement Support
0)
2
a)
O
Co
O7
a)
a)
O
Co
Q
U,
Ca
a=+
U)
0
cu
0,
co
co
a
'0
O_
a
0
a
a)
1:71
•
0
(13
V
0
CO
a)
V)
Co
O
co
0
V
i
co
' � Q
N .N
W �
L
Co
A L
acu
a,
O •—
o
W
a o
.§
V N
� o
Q
Ca
Z �
E E
0
Co
V
Q
Co
co
0)
ca
0
co
0
V
Co
RELEVANT PROJECTS
(n
.cu
ro
co
Q
O
co
0_
v)
0
0
Co
vi
co
a)
O
0
co
co
Q
.0)cu
U,
Q
a)
T1
Z)
CL
•(.3
0
O
tTS
W
CD
ca
Ca
.13
t/1
ca
W
•
Co.
U,
a)
Q
Q
L/)
C9
V
cL
cu
CU
to
'CO
LL
cu
V
lm
0
a)
O
0
cu
0
0
L,
O
0
co
0_
0_
Q
L!)
L!)
C9
0)
Ca
0
v
0
O
co
0
co
0
N
i
•
a'
co
co
L/)
a)
0
a
I
RELEVANT PROJECTS
a)
0
0
i
V
fa
Q
0
O
AE
W
Q
ict
N
N
N
C)
LL
•
L
a)
a)
W
a)
LJ)
0
0
a
ca
a
0
Q
4-
N
0
Q
0
V
v)
•
Megan Flaherty, Graphic Design and Communications
a)
W
L!)
z
a)
N
12
C)
0
m
V
•
a)
a)
L/)
cu
V
Q
Ca
0)
Ca
a)
U,
Ca
Q
co
Teresa Chang, RSP1 (Toole), Analyst
vi
F
a)
a)
co
a)
V
Q
v)
0
0
v)
O
co
a)
a)
Q
CO
a)
0,
*N
Co
Q
U,
U,
co
co
co
CCS
cu
U,
a)
co
Co
O
0
Q
v)
CCS
0)
'N
v)
v)
V
a)
L�)
v)
V
Q
co
0
co
0
co
U,
a)
Q
v
co
O
v)
co
co
(73
co
0
O
0
O
U,
U,
U,
a=+
co
Co
O
+�
V
C/)
O
0
a)
a)
a)
Q
a)
0
Co
CD
a)
0
co
0
Co
V
(n
(n
0
CO
cn
a)
a)
co
co
v)
U,
U,
a)
v;
0
O_
0
CO
0
U,
Co
vi
F
V
0
v
co
O
a
CO
vi
Q
Co.
(r)
Q
co
V
0
(/)
a)
co
co
co
co
0)
a=+
0
0
(73
a)
F
0
00
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
RELEVANT PROJECTS
vi
O
CUD
0_
co
co
O
N
ro
V
CO
co
CO
vi
CO
0_
0
co
cu
a)
co
CO
a)
•0
a)
O
V
4-
CD
H
0
•
V
O
0
.U)
co
CO
co
co
-o
co
co
N
a)
co
O
co
-o
-o
U)
O
O
a)
0
U)
-o
J
CD
F -
v
ICC
(13
1
U
N
N
U
_
U
•
CO
U)
CU
•=
O
0
v)
S=
O
N
>
V
a)
co
co
U)
0
V
CD
.U)
CU
4-
N
V
9-
CD
H
•i
t+
a
•
a)
-o
O
E
co
LE
a
F
O
Q
0
a)
.c
U)
O
> co
Ca
CO E
CO
-0O
O1a)
s= L
>
-o
-o
5
0
0_
s=
O
U)
V
0
CD
J
ra
F
0
CL
LLI
0)
V
U
i
•
a
a)
0
U)
a)
F
0
aJ
co
cn
co
RELEVANT PROJECTS
co
U)
s
U
a)
.O
Q
co
co
cu
O
Q
O
CO
-o
co
a)
CO
Q
co
CO
ro
v)
CO
0
Zs
is
0
a
4-
cn
V
Cil
•
CO
a
a
CC
V
CL
a
CD
•i
O
U
U
•
CO
Q
0
0
0
4-7
co
co
O
CO
a)
F
V)
F
v)
CO
c0
CD
Q
U
V
a)
U
U)
O
CD
U)
a)
co
c0
C/)
0
a)
•=
N
.CD
CD
C/)
t` CO
CD
a--,
.=
0
CD
CD
CO
W
CO
v)
cL
O
•
Q)
E
0
a
0
•.e.)
cu
cu
C
;c
0)
F
Q
a)
.=
t/)
O7
.=
Q
ro
O
co
co
c0
CO
0
CO
• V
0
0
a)
ce
F-
C,)
CO
U
^
0
v
a)
Q
a)
a)
v)
(/)
(n
U
a)
0_
ci))
co
U)
0
0
0
O
CU
M
V)
0_
co
2
a)
a-+
co
a)
.=
O
U
O
Q
co
v)
cu
-o
-o
CD
O
0
CD
CO
0
CO
CD
co
t.V
CD
O
-a
a)
cu
V)
Q
a)
a)
-o
co
O7
O
>
(/)
co
0
0
0
•=
0
a)
.a
a)
co
O
Ca
co
v)
0
a)
O
CO C1)
CO =
0
CO
Q
O
`
CD
CO
0
J
CL)
CO
CO
4--0
U)
0
CO
0
CD
RELEVANT PROJECTS
U)
CO
CO
CD
0
Q
CO
CU
U)
.=
a)
.=
.CO
CO
O
a)
a)
O
a)
.a)
a_
0
0
0
0
O
a)
c/)
cu
O
U)
0
(r)
a
0
0_
O
0
a--+
CO
0
cu
a)
G
U
a)
O
0
U)
•i
U
0
•
cJ)
CU
a)
CO
U
CU
CO
U)
0
U
U)
co
co
cu
co
O
0
U)
CD
CLO
CO
N �--'
CU
CO
N
L � CU O �
W(./)
•
Q
= U
•E E
= V/
(13
a
o �
•i 05
O
U �
O O
0
_ =
2
• •
co
ro
U)
0
(i)
V"
,O
ci
C0 -0
a CO
aJ
icr
Vi
o 0-
D 0_
•
PROJECTS
RELEVANT
U)
0
co
(/)
0
0
Ca
a
(/)
O
O
_
•
Eric Francen, Concept Design Lead
Project Selection Lead
Q
F
a)
Q
Q
(/)
V
a)
a_
a)
O
co
F
U)
U
cu
O
V
et
0
V
a
O
CD
U
E
U
et
E
N
N
N
U
V
U-
•
i
CO
0
Q
O
U)
CU
a)
0
Q
a)
CD
0
CO
J
U)
U)
CD
�
T
CD
F-
O
CT)
a)
a)
:co
0
U)
0
CD
a)
CU
CO
a)
0
V I
.a)
a)
i
.0_
F
CO
cL
O
F
L
0
a)
F
a)
a)
a)
U
a)
Q
a)
a
U)
W
O
H
a_
W
a_
C)
w
V
z
a)
.a)
ro
co
co
a)
U)
.U)
W
Vi
•co
V
a)
U)
i
CO
O
0
0
CO
(73
0
U
cu
i4
iR.
a)
cU
a)
U)
O
Q
CO
CT
LE
a)
0
U)
co
a)
CU
'=
0
F
CO
0
+�
coE
Q
CO
co
l`U
CD
•=
U
O
Q
a)
O
a
or)
(/)
U
z
a)
V
U)
O
U
co
V
co
Q
O
V
CD
U
CO
CUO
.=
a)
CO
cu
`.0
a)
U
N
U)
0
a
(13
CD
0
co
co
O
a)
i
a)
N
.a)
a)
V;
CU
T- D
co
(./)
CO
U)
O
F
V
CO
(- 73
0
0
(i)
CO
to
0
0_
CO
(/)
CD
0
CU
U
Q
a
O
a-
0
CD
U)
a)
CO
U)
RELEVANT PROJECTS
U)
()
0
CO
cu
CO
co
co
CO
0
a
U)
.=
•=
N
N
c0
a)
U
)
a)
U)
To
= O
Q
O
• a �
0 •_
v
� N
a
O
•'.) O =
▪ U O
E
o _CI>
o
-45 0= v E
a)
� =
i
• w
• V _
0' 0 Q
W 13 N
oas •i U
L O oof
()%1
C
.CM cr
a� N N
U
• • •
CD
O
O
co
cu
co
O
co
a-
O
CD
^=
a)
a_
a)
0
0
U
0
U
U)
CU
co
N
CU
Z5
0
0
CU
U
co
CO
a)
co
U)
a)
•=
a)
.a)
a
CO
Q
(13
0
a)
a)
a
0
0_
0_
U)
0
U)
0
a,
C
O
a,
Concept Design
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
W
V
E
co
V
v)
a)
TD
CO
CO
co
0
CO
co
co
O
co
W
V
z
W
RELEVANT EXPER
C)
E
J
CO
v)
Q
(r)
C)
V
a)
F
CEO
V
N
N
CO
O)
a)
0
co
v)
F-
vi
C)
v)
C)
F
O
O
O
O
2
SS4A and Other Safety Planning
u)
F
co
v)
v)
0
F
O)
O)
C)
Q
-o
-o
LLJ
CL
O
CU
a
W
0
Q.)
aLLI
CO
O)
•O
C)
N
W
U
0)
O_
az
v)
(/)
CO
C)
O
CD
CI)
a)
5
-o
F-
vi
O
C)
i
C)
.=
0
O
Q
Q
v)
CO
a)
a_
Q
w
v)
CD
a_
O
U
Q
0
2
co
0 -
CO
U
(/)
a)
a)
0
F
Q
co
co
0
O
O
co
CO
O
co
F
(D_
Q
Q
(i)
co
O)
co
Q
co
v)
-o
V
F
O
CO C)
L �
a
cn �
Q O
L U
-co co
ce
o
-Oco
C)
O
con
co
0
0
O
O
O
U
(1)
CO
u)
0
CD
Q
O)
'N
CO
C)
O
N
.0
Q
CO
0
N
O
v)
H
O
2
O)
O
v)
cu
•
co
cu
v)
v)
CO
co
CO
O •O
O
CO
co
v)
CD
co
0
a-+
,a
v I
0
c0
Ca
V
O
O
0,
0
TO
CO
F
5
a
0,
'U
co
-o
a)
->
CO
a)
v)
O
co
co
a)
U
C)
V)
c0
O
Q
0
Q
co
(D_
v)
L
co
0
a)
O)
CD
a)
v
co
*U
co
(L/)
Q
co
O)
0
To
F
O)
5
O
Q
O
cu
O
v)
N
N
O
Q
CD
O
Q
.TD
CO
(/)
Ca
N
N
co
cu
a)
co
cu
co
z
N
F
O
4--,
O
N
CO
.
0
Q
CO
CO
v)
O
F
a
CO
O
F
0
v)
v
co
CO
0
O_
co
Q
F-
v)
a)
co
O
F
co
co
O
C)
0
Q
O
4--,
CO
a
ro
O
Q
CO
v)
CO
CO
co
cu
N
O
v)
U
v)
U
a
C\\
O
0
0
a
O
RELEVANT PROJECTS
cu
U)
.cu
co
O
N
CO
O_
CO
V
co
CO
a)
v)
V)
C)
(r)
CD
CO
Q
0
O
C)
a--+
CD
U
0
(>)
CO
N
i
v)
CD
v)
a)
F
F
O
cl
CO
F
O
CO
O)
vi
V
O
CO
O
CO
Ca
^J`
W
O
CO
CO
U1
CO
•
F
O
C/)
0
4 CO
CD U
Ca `�
N CO
'7) V
a
E • c,
O -
i a
a 0
V ++
2a
•
v)
v)
0
(n
a)
cp
CN
O
CD
0
ca
vi
O
Q
v)
C)
C-
O
CN
C)
LL
0
Q
CO
C/)
.2cu
C)
0
O
O
CD
al
a
a
O)
Q
v)
O
CEO
Q
co
0
O
V)
CEO
u)
C/)
0
co
v)
a)
Q
CD
C)
Q
CO
CO
O
co
v)
.�
CO
a
0
v)
O
N
O
C)
v)
C/)
CI)
H
C)
cu
F
F
0
U
cl
v)
CO
O
CO
.O
O
a
Q
v)
CO
CO
CO
0
O
2
i
v
N
z
•
cD
v)
C)
W
F
V
co
F
0
Q
N
.5
a)
U
O
Q
co
•O
Q
cu
O
O
CO
u)
N
co
v)
co
O
.co
CO
C)
a,
CO
O_
0
CO
ct
CD
r�
v I
N
C/)
4--,
0
CD -
0
O
CEO
v)
v)
N
•V
O)
CO
O
2
ro
U
0
v)
0
CD
O
O
G
O
O
C/)
O
0
F
O
co
vi
co
cu
CD
CO
O
0
CVO
0
i
C\\
cu
a
a
CO
O)
U
O
CO
O
O
O
CL
v)
CO
a--0
v)
co
i
O
O
2
C)
Tu
co
v)
O
v)
i
co
a
v)
F-
CO
(r)
cu
CO
O
C/)
O
O
2
co
CO
O
U
0
v)
CO
Q
C)
C)
Q
0
u)
V
V
Q
O
U
U)
C)
()
CO
CI)
0
ate-,
O
CO
0
O
CO
O
V)
0
v)
CL5
CO
V) O
v)
0
CO
O
CO
chi)
0
v)
CO
O
CO
0,
O
O)
CO
CO
CO
v)
CD
U
O,
N
aJ
O
a)
N
CO
CO
a_ 2
F-
0
F
lO
v)
C)
0
U
0
O
a a a
.z Q
cu
Ea.Q��a`�aa�
a ., aQ_cu za p u
"2 :2 LLicrLn .2 '''' E" :-..q .s.b.,L) 2
t .Irl - a) Ui m
yam., a O ' p ' j. • N OO
.a aszu • . W � '�' a � ' 11 =
0 C): O C p z O t-.$) c)
F
O
V
N
0
O)
C)
v)
CO
co
v)
CD
C)
CD
C)
U
O
CO
cu
F -
WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY
Q
z
0
LU
0
›-
C.)
CC -
z
w
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
V
(!i
U
W
z
cu
a)
Q
4_
cu
E
V
0
a
References
L.
o
o L.
0
v0
• p' Np a 0 Cl)
a)
u v) O c a; = o cu 0 coJ a) a,
O _
a -- LL
DC ~ N• co N w .O z o
p' a) Q •2 O o o v) rn = o Z a)
a) }\\' z ./off �a') a) ccy) y E COE M z />,+ °' ,N ® 'a)
co _a•
w •V O s u tca .2 >, co Ca N a) = a) a) a)
= -0 N .O Ca = a) C� U a Ca N C� N LO CD `~ — J —
p Cl.) Q= •— = V M — M = L.L C4.‘: O L.L O
V O •v Q= Q o M Q ® �� Q O O= v
a) -0 a3 E ca V O .� o }' LO ca a) g = E cfl gcu 0-
L1) i& a
1
r
,,�,a) = N v) (1 vi cu a)
a) V = � CD O V Ca .= > ro co = O U O a) 0
O U O Q • C. Ca �--+ a) CO co al V V p O Ca IS) 0 U v,
a--• N
O a) O' CU O= =
•� > a) O a) O 0 O 'O O .� a)
Ca V = t„ '� V o — N = — — V +-►
U = S = a) Q ,.. — 0 V coCD - - v — CD Q •
O. N Ca •0
a) - . * O 0- = CC •vi cn }' cn T .v
> }' , � = t/) (O • v) V) >, N CO O Q co O p Q
N O COCa 4--�
co - O o .,,, V o
•
cl
U1 N V cc o) cu u N U1 O ca �, ci: N ca 7.0v) i (/) > + L� >
(4
V≥ X ., OV �-_�= g
cc, to = O -C p V CL= - O 0O O O = O N N
V a) a) a) a a) .� a) vi o •— a) ca c� o
-0 O Ca O o N v) - }' co '� co co +-' O O
O p cam,) ID O tz ;,: , O >, vi co O cn �, O O > -0 �4 . _ 0 co
p `~ >'
M }' O +-� v . V }' O faco
V V ''-� }' v `~ O a� a) a) +�-►
}' `� a -0 - '— Cam/') = a) Ca a3 i }' a) >, co ' —
a) �,, o o a)
a) o -0 E = ca co }'
> < o •� _c co
co v .N N ca o < '� _ O N O }' V
c O N= O7 = a, pv)v> ca U �� •Q
O = Ca O > a) 0 a) '� O ' = }' CO CI) a--) a Q CD CO _C 4-,
CU +-, — E = " 7.) v >, u -.-scp = >' E.
E�j > O v) — cu 0 a) • • —CU O O Ur N OV
o -a >, 4,) a- r° S -2 CO — 4-, = " = ej CD CC
.bet = ! 0 _0 Q a) i Q T N
ovi p a) Z 0 0) N E o O o 0 ca CO 1C cu >, c.) ca
92 P
a) . = a) VCU
- O = ' a) vi
a) V >' O (/) - co a) l. ,� Q o) U
E CD ca
L.
co
17
11- 70
CU
co
01 NI
O 'v, cari, O CD
O '� p O •o E to Q
t3 p +-+ _0= O Ca = V — _I— O a) ._ Q O CD O 0) O L i-CO Ln _ CO i O N
Q., Q o a) O= p O p -C = E O = p 0 E-- p O a) O
Ca v) V O U +� - .2 E a) Ca Q ° v) - Q Ll.... I..L Q N
BLOOI
Z
LLI
0
0
a
I-
1
z
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
Shakopee Safety Action Plan Staff Hour and Project Cost Estimate
PROJECT: Safety Action Plan
CLIENT: City of Shakopee
Fit s_u
L w --.
L _
~a d � U
W v
N v H
Y
O
26:.2
o O
L,
4"
O
M
4"
O
O
CO
r
U,
U,
N
Cr CO 00 Co A^ CO N 00 co CO Ln Co
CO Co M p Op O C0(N CO CI in Ln
▪ _b.).44 4 4 M
LO
M
W
CO N
N O N O,
Co CO M N
a1
Co
co 00
CO Cq 00
CO O
Co IN N
I- C4 M
N
t • Co -0 LO ,7,., LOCo LO
CO
CO I.--,Ln CC) N Cfl CO
O ▪ CO • O
-79-
1
C
M
N
O , O LN �N LO
O N
N
........................•............•.....
................•....................
c �
E_
O ra E c
O co
ro
Lri
� O �
N N O
Cfl
■
o
� N
00 N N N N
, 00 O N NLO LO
CO
LO
O DD
IC) N
N
U,
M
N
Proposal for City of Shakopee Safe Streets for All Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
ALLIANT
oo 00
w
O
o
M rn (-4 a
Lfl N 44 49-
• 41-
C) NI CO N
N
M 00
00 co (0
a, N CO CO Co
00 r N
00 06
1
4
3 rn �
M M
i.4
CoCID 71- cNi
N �
M
t0
N N N
Iz
0,
O
N
N CSOO CO Co LC)▪ OLN ▪ N
OO
C O N Co Co
( 4;7, �4 44 84
N
IS) Li,N ▪ M Co M
CD
N
LO
C9
N
N
a
O
11.4 Public Engagement
O, M
00 00
fi4 N
49.
O O O O
4)Ln O O O
N Ln
�a4 M
fa4
O O O O O
Lf1 O O O
b4 {f} O
N LC)
-Eft CO
s
N
Request for Proposals
Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A)
Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activities
SAP 166-589-001
Addendum No. 1
R
Issued On: January 20, 2026
Request for Proposals - Addendum No. 1
SS4A Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activies
153
Request for Proposals - Addendum No. 1
SS4A Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activies
154
ADDENDUM NO. 1
This Addendum No. 1 shall be attached to and made part of the Request for Proposals (RFP) and
the resulting Professional Services Agreement. All proposers shall acknowledge receipt of this
Addendum by signing the certification included herein.
Except as modified by this Addendum, all other terms and conditions of the RFP remain
unchanged.
1. FEDERAL FUNDING NOTICE AND INCORPORATION OF SS4A TERMS
This project is funded in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) through the
Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) FY24 Grant Program.
The SS4A FY24 Terms and Conditions, as included in the RFP as Appendix B, are incorporated
by reference and apply to the extent relevant to the Consultant's scope of services. The Consultant
shall comply with all applicable provisions therein and shall ensure that required federal provisions
are flowed down to all subconsultants and lower -tier subcontractors.
2. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES (DBE) STATEMENT
DBE -Neutral Contract Statement
This contract is designated as DBE -neutral in accordance with 49 CFR Part 26.
No contract -specific DBE participation goal has been established for this project.
DBE participation is encouraged, but not required, and firms will not be penalized or rewarded in
the evaluation process based on DBE participation.
DBE Nondiscrimination Assurance
The Consultant, subconsultants, and any lower -tier subcontractors shall comply with the
nondiscrimination requirements of 49 CFR §26.7 and shall not discriminate on the basis of race,
color, sex, or national origin in the performance of this contract.
The Consultant shall include the following nondiscrimination assurance in every subcontract and
lower -tier subcontract:
"The Consultant, subconsultant, or subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of
race, color, sex, or national origin in the performance of this contract."
Page 11
Request for Proposals - Addendum No. 1
SS4A Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activies
155
Prompt Payment Requirements
The Consultant shall comply with 49 CFR §26.29 regarding prompt payment.
DBE Participation Reporting
Although this is a DBE -neutral contract, the Consultant shall report all DBE participation obtained
on this project, if any.
• The Consultant shall identify all DBE firms participating as subconsultants or suppliers.
• DBE firms must be certified at the time of contract execution.
• Participation shall be reported in the format required by FHWA and may be required
during the contract term and at project completion.
Failure to accurately report DBE participation may be considered a breach of contract.
Certification of Nondiscrimination
By submitting a proposal, the Proposer certifies that it:
• Has not discriminated against any employee or applicant for employment because of race,
color, sex, or national origin
• Will comply with all applicable nondiscrimination requirements of 49 CFR Part 26
• Will ensure compliance by all subconsultants and lower -tier subcontractors
3. RESPONSIBLE CHARGE
(23 CFR §172.9(a))
The City shall retain and exercise responsible charge of the Project in accordance with 23 CFR
Part 172.
The City Engineer, who is a qualified City employee, shall be designated to manage, oversee, and
approve all phases of the work, including scope, schedule, budget, technical decisions,
deliverables, and acceptance of services. Responsibility for the Project shall not be delegated to
the Consultant.
4. FEDERAL AUDIT, RECORDS, AND ACCESS
(23 CFR §172.9; 2 CFR §200.337)
The Consultant shall maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other
evidence pertaining to this Agreement in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.
The City, Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), the USDOT Office of Inspector
General, and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their authorized
Page 12
Request for Proposals - Addendum No. 1
SS4A Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activies
156
representatives, shall have the right of access to such records for the purposes of audit,
examination, excerpts, and transcriptions.
Records shall be retained for a minimum of three (3) years after final payment, or longer if
required due to audit findings, litigation, or federal grant requirements.
5. FEDERAL COST PRINCIPLES AND ALLOWABLE COSTS
(2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E)
All costs billed under this Agreement must comply with the Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200).
Costs must be:
• Allowable
• Allocable
• Reasonable
• Necessary to the performance of the work
• Adequately documented
Any costs determined to be unallowable under federal regulations shall not be reimbursed.
6. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
(23 CFR .4172.7(b)(4); 2 CFR 4200.112)
The Consultant certifies that no actual, potential, or apparent conflict of interest exists that
would impair the Consultant's ability to perform the services objectively, ethically, and in the
public interest.
The Consultant shall disclose in writing any potential conflicts of interest that arise during the
term of the Agreement and shall take corrective action as directed by the City.
7. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE
(2 CFR §200.340)
In addition to the termination provisions contained in the Agreement, the City may terminate
this Agreement, in whole or in part, for convenience, when it is in the City's best interest, in
accordance with 2 CFR §200.340.
In the event of termination for convenience, the Consultant shall be compensated for allowable
costs incurred and services satisfactorily performed up to the effective date of termination,
consistent with federal requirements and the SS4A FY24 Terms and Conditions.
Page 13
Request for Proposals - Addendum No. 1
SS4A Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activies
157
8. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE
In the event of inconsistency among the contract documents, the order of precedence shall be:
1. This Addendum No. 1
2. The Professional Services Agreement
3. Attachment B — SS4A FY24 Terms and Conditions
4. The Request for Proposals
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND CERTIFICATION
I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Addendum No. 1 and certify compliance with the
requirements contained herein.
,, Aa___
Signature
_Mike Anderson
Printed Name
_Principal, Alliant Engineering
Title / Firm
_February 11, 2026
Date
Page 14
Request for Proposals - Addendum No. 1
SS4A Safety Action Plan and Supplemental Planning Activies
158
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.1
March 3, 2026
Approval of the February 17, 2026, City Council Minutes
Rick Parsons
Action to be considered:
Approve the February 17, 2026, City Council minutes
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
N/A
Recommendation:
Approve the February 17, 2026, City Council minutes.
Budget Impact:
N/A
Attachments:
City Council Minutes 02-17-2026
159
SHAKOPEE
City Council
City Hall
485 Gorman Street
Shakopee, MN, 55379
Tuesday, February 17, 2026
7:00 p.m.
Vision: Shakopee is a place where people want to be! A distinctive river town, with a
multitude of business, cultural and recreational opportunities in a safe, welcoming, and
attractive environment for residents and visitors.
Mission: Our mission is to deliver high quality services essential to maintaining a safe
and sustainable community. We commit to doing this cost-effectively, with integrity and
transparency.
1) Call to Order
2) Roll Call
PRESENT:
Mayor Lehman, Council Member Contreras, Council Member Whiting, Council
Member DuLaney, and Council Member Lara
ABSENT:
None.
ALSO PRESENT:
None.
3) Pledge of Allegiance
4) Approval of Agenda
Council Member Whiting made a motion to approve the agenda as amended,
second by Council Member Contreras and the motion passed. 5 - 0
5
Consent Agenda
5.a) Certification of Delinquent Sewer and Storm Drainage Accounts
5.b) Monthly Financial Report - January 2026
5.c) Approve plans and authorize bidding for Phase III of the Downtown
ADA, Lighting and Tree Rehab Improvement Project
5.d) School Resource Officer Agreement Renewal
5.e) Approve the 2026 Tree Purchase Orders for Annual Resident Tree Sale
and Tree Replacement Program
5.f) Recycling Grant for Clean -Up Day events in 2026.
5.g) Approve On -Sale and Sunday Liquor Licenses for Shakopee
Entertainment LLC. dba Mystic Lake Amphitheater
5.h) Authorization to Add Three Full -Time Firefighter Positions
5.i) Strength Equipment Replacement
5.j) Award Tree Removal Contract for the Minnesota Riverbank Stabilization
Project
5.k) Approve the Engineering Traffic Operations Policies and Procedures
Manual
5.1) Fee Schedule Amendment
5.m) Approval of the February 4, 2026, City Council Minutes
5.n) Approve Change Order No.1 with The Dock Doctors for Marina Materials
for Minnesota Riverbank Stabilization Improvements
5.o) Resolution of Support for State of Minnesota Job Creation Funding for
tenant at 5225 Dean Lake Boulevard.
5.p) Laserfiche Licensing and Maintenance Renewal
Council Member Lara made a motion to approve consent agenda, second by
Council Member DuLaney and the motion passed. 5 - 0
6) Public Comment
7) Business removed from consent agenda
8) General Business
8.a) Resolution of Appreciation for Shakopee Chief of Police Jeff Tate and
Acceptance of his Resignation with Regret
Council Member Lara made a motion to approve Resolution R2026-029,
a Resolution of Appreciation to Chief Jeff Tate and Acceptance of his
161
Resignation with Regret, second by Council Member DuLaney and the
motion passed. 4 - 1
Nays: Mayor Lehman
8.b) Preliminary and Final Plat of Southbridge Crossings Sixth Addition
Council Member Lara made a motion to approve Resolution R2026-024,
second by Council Member Contreras and the motion passed. 5 - 0
8.c) Monthly Financial Report - December 2025
Informational only.
8.d) Public Works and Engineering Annual Report Presentation
Informational only.
9) Reports
9.a) City Bill List
9.b) News and Announcements
10) Other Business
11) Adjourn to March 3, 2026, at 7:00 pm
Council Member Lara made a motion to adjourn to March 3, 2026, at 7:00 pm,
second by Council Member DuLaney and the motion passed. 5 - 0
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.m
March 3, 2026
Declare one forfeited vehicle as surplus property and authorize
disposal
Josh Davis, Sergeant
Action to be considered:
Declare one forfeited vehicle as surplus property and authorize disposal.
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
The following vehicle was obtained through forfeiture proceedings and is described as
follows:
1. 2008 Volkswagen Jetta, VIN: 3VWRM71 K28M 139153
The vehicle is not suitable for resale and will be junked.
Recommendation:
Approve policy/action as requested.
Budget Impact:
None.
Attachments:
163
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.n
March 3, 2026
Approve the Interim Use Permit (IUP) and Purchase of Temporary Fire
Station 2 Facilities
Joe Simon, Fire Chief
Action to be considered:
Approve the Interim Use Permit (IUP), contingent upon Planning Commission approval,
and approve the purchase of temporary fire station 2 facilities.
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
Fire Station 2 is scheduled to undergo significant interior remodeling and facility
upgrades in 2026. To maintain uninterrupted fire and emergency response service during
construction, staff recommends temporary facilities to support on -site firefighter
operations.
Staff recommends a temporary trailer placed in the grass area north of the station's
parking lot, located on the Lion's Park parcel. This trailer will serve as a short-term
workspace and living area for firefighters during the construction period. The placement
of the temporary workspace and living area trailer requires an IUP, which is currently in
process. Following meeting the conditions of the IUP and staff review, the item is being
recommended for approval at the March 5, 2026, Planning Commission meeting, with City
Council action to follow. To mitigate long lead times and maintain the project schedule,
staff recommends initiating the order upon Planning Commission approval. Should the
permit be denied, the order will not be placed.
During construction, restroom and shower facilities will be unavailable for a portion of
the project timeline. To maintain essential hygiene facilities for firefighters, staff
recommends a temporary restroom/shower trailer to be installed inside the fire station.
These temporary arrangements are necessary to ensure continued operational
readiness, maintain appropriate firefighter working conditions, and avoid service
164
disruptions during the Station 2 construction project.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval.
Budget Impact:
The temporary workspace and living quarters required to support Fire Station 2
operations during construction are estimated to cost $39,454.14. The temporary
restroom and shower facilities to be installed inside the station are estimated at
$28,800.00. Electrical and mechanical needs are projected at an additional $6,500.00. In
total, the temporary facilities are expected to cost approximately $75,000.00 and will be
included in the Station 2 renovation project.
Attachments:
Shakopee Fire Station 2 Temp Workspace Living Quarters.pdf
Willscot OMNI National Cooperative Contract.pdf
Willscot Trailer Location.pdf
WillScot_Trailer Agreement.pdf
Shakopee Fire Station 2 Temp Restrooms_Showers.pdf
165
VIJ�LLSC4T
Your Sales Representative
Nadir Yusuf
+1 (763) 215-0017
nadir.yusof@willscot.com
Agreement Number: Q-2275332
Revision: 3
Date: 1/29/2026
Expiration Date: 2/27/2026
Master Lease Agreement and Order
Lessee:
City of Shakopee
485 Gorman St
Shakopee, MN 55379
Contact:
Torn Pitschneider
485 Gorman St
Shakopee, MN 55379, US
Phone: 9522339300
Email: tpitschneider@shakopeemn.gov
Ship To Address:
1001 Vierling Dr W
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379, US
Estimated Delivery Date :2/23/2026
Rental Pricing Per Billing Cycle
Quantity Price
Extended
70x14 Mobile Office or Similar
Air Purifier
Loss Damage Waiver (13+)
General Liability Insurance
Basic Entrance Package - Steps
Window/Door Security Bundle - 40ft & Greater
Minimum Lease Billing Period: 10
Billing Cycle : 28 days
anchor cost
included at
$1223
1 $ 1,999.00
1
1
1
2
1
$ 50.00
$ 219.00
$ 30.00
$ 130.00
$ 100.00
$ 1,999.00
$ 50.00
$ 219.00
$ 30.00
$ 260.00
$ 100.00
Total Recurring Building Charges:
Subtotal of Other Recurring Charges:
$ 1,999.00
$ 659.00
Total Recurring Charges Per Billing Cycle: $ 2,658.00
Total Recurring Charges Per Billing Cycle Including Estimated Taxes: $ 2,880.62
Estimated Delivery And Installation
Essentials Delivery Charge
Modification to Unit L
Delivery
Setup
Knockdown - estimated
Return - estimated
1
1
$ 0.00
$ 8,027.14
$ 0.00
$ 8,027.14
$ 615.00
$ 2,717.00
$ 900.00
$ 615.00
Total Delivery and Installation Charges:
$ 12,874.14
Total Delivery and Installation Charges Including Estimated Taxes:
$ 13,952.35
Estimated Final Return Charges*
Due On Final Invoice*:
$ 0.00
Due On Final Invoice Including Estimated Taxes*:
$ 0.00
Total Including Recurring Billing Charges, Delivery, Installation and Return**: $ 39,454.14
Total Including Recurring Billing Charges, Delivery, Installation and Return Including Estimated Taxes**: $ 42,758.55
Summary of Charges
Model: 70x14 Mobile Office or Similar
Quantity: 1
Total Charges for (1) Building(s): $ 39,454.14
Total Charges for (1) Building(s) Including Estimated Tax: $ 42,758.55
Williams Scotsman, Inc. 6400 E McDowell Rd., 3rd Floor, Scottsdale, AZ 85257
1-800-782-1500
Page 1 of 3
166
VIJI LLSC4T
Your Sales Representative
Nadir Yusuf
+1 (763) 215-0017
nadir.yusof@willscot.com
Agreement Number: Q-2275332
Revision: 3
Date: 1/29/2026
Expiration Date: 2/27/2026
Master Lease Terms & Conditions
1. This Master Lease Agreement shall apply to any Order between Williams Scotsman, Inc. and/or any affiliate ("Lessor") and City of Shakopee
("Lessee") for any Equipment as defined below ("Agreement"). This Agreement and any Order governs Lessee's use of Lessor's Equipment. By
(1) signing this Agreement, (2) executing an Order that references this Agreement, (3) taking delivery of the Equipment, or (4) other commercially
acceptable methods of acceptance, Lessee agrees to the terms of this Agreement.
2. Definitions
a. "Delivery Date" shall be defined as the date the Equipment was physically delivered. Within 48 hours of delivery, Lessee shall inspect the
Equipment and notify Lessor in writing of any defects. Lessee must contact Lessor to relocate any Equipment and obtain Lessor's written consent prior
to doing so. Lessee shall pay Lessor's relocation rates if the Equipment is moved without Lessor's written consent. Lessee acknowledges that delivery of
Equipment may be in parts and not all at once.
b. "Equipment" means products leased from Lessor, which include Storage Containers, Refrigerated Storage Containers, Ground Level Offices
("GLO"), Modular Equipment, FLEX offices, Blast Resistant products, ancillary products and essentials, Additional Rental Equipment, and any additional
products or services available for Lease from Lessor at the time of an Order. Any Lease for Equipment such as an Over the Road Trailer, Temporary
Structure or other Equipment may be subject to an Addendum or Equipment specific terms and conditions. Lessee agrees Equipment shall not be used
for residential occupancy.
c. "Lease" is defined as any Order for the Lease of Equipment by Lessee from Lessor.
d. "Lessee" means in the case of an individual accepting this Agreement on his or her own behalf, such individual, or in the case of an individual
accepting this Agreement on behalf of a company or other legal entity, the company or other legal entity for which such individual is accepting this
Agreement, and affiliates of that company or entity (for so long as they remain affiliates), which have entered into an Order.
e. "Order" means a WillScot document or online Order forming an individual Lease, specifying the Equipment to be provided hereunder that is
entered into between Lessee and Lessor or any of their affiliates, including any addenda and supplements thereto. By entering into an Order hereunder,
the Lessee or it's affiliate agree to be bound by the terms of this Agreement as if it were an original party hereto.
3. Lessee is responsible for all site conditions, use permits, and applicable Fees, and maintains sole responsibility for site selection, which shall be a
flat, firm and open space, and prepared prior to Equipment Delivery as set forth in the Site Suitability Addendum, incorporated herein by reference.
4. If delivery of the Equipment is delayed through no fault of Lessor for a period of more than thirty (30) days from the confirmation date set forth in the
Order, Lessee shall pay Lessor a storage fee equal to 50% of the Total Lease Charges for each thirty (30) day period of delay, or portion thereof, until
the Equipment is delivered, in addition to any other Lease payments, charges and Fees due. Any such storage fees shall not affect commencement of
the Minimum Lease Term.
5. Lessee is responsible to inspect and maintain the Equipment in good condition. Lessee shall use the Equipment in accordance with and be
responsible for all maintenance as set forth in the Williams Scotsman Service Guide and/or any instructions contained in or on the Equipment.
6. Lessee shall maintain commercially reasonable insurance limits covering the Equipment's replacement cost. Lessee may obtain insurance for
their contents at their discretion or can elect to participate in an optional third -party Contents Insurance Program provided through Lessor for a fee.
Optional coverage programs offered to Lessee include General Liability, Loss Damage Waiver and Content Insurance. Details can be found at https://
www.willscot.com/the-essentials/insurance-and-waivers-package.
7. Lessee shall provide no less than 15 days prior notice to schedule a pick-up date, and no less than thirty (30) days prior notice for any multi -floor
Modular Equipment. Lessor shall not prorate any fraction of a Billing Cycle. Upon return, Lessee agrees to pay for all reasonable charges for cleaning,
repair, and any damage beyond ordinary wear and tear. Lessee may have the option to pick-up and/or return certain Equipment, which shall be subject
to signing an appropriate addendum.
8. LESSOR MAKES NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND LESSEE AGREES THAT IT HAS SOLELY DETERMINED THAT THE
EQUIPMENT ARE SUITABLE FOR LESSEE'S INTENDED USE. LESSEE LEASES THE EQUIPMENT "AS IS, WITH ALL FAULTS."
9. Each Party agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the other harmless for any third -party claim arising from the alleged conduct of the other Party
under this Agreement. Neither Party shall be liable to the other Party for any special, punitive, exemplary, indirect or consequential damages, losses or
damages for lost revenues or profits whether foreseeable or not, arising out of, or in connection with this Agreement.
10. This Agreement shall supersede and replace all prior documents and agreements between the Parties.
11. Lessee shall be solely liable for any and all applicable sales and use, lease or rental, excise, gross receipts, transaction privilege, value-added,
goods and services, or similar transactional tax, levy duty or assessment imposed by a taxing authority ("Taxes"). Lessee shall pay or shall reimburse
Lessor for any Taxes related to the Equipment.
12. Lessee's failure to make timely payments, filing of bankruptcy, abandonment of the Equipment or other failure to comply with this Agreement is
a default, allowing Lessor to immediately terminate this Agreement, at which time Lessor has the right to pick-up and remove the Equipment upon
reasonable notice or as required by law.
13. Lessee shall be solely liable for any and all applicable pass -through charges for costs associated with the Equipment including, but not limited
to, ad valorem, real property, and ownership tax/personal property taxes, licensing and titling Fees, and any other expenses and/or third -party Fees
associated with the Equipment ("Fees").
14. Except as otherwise stated herein, Lessor may amend the terms and conditions of this Agreement and such amended terms shall be effective thirty
(30) days after notice is provided to Lessee. If Lessee does not object in writing to such amended terms before their effective date, such terms shall be
deemed accepted. Lessee may not amend or assign this Agreement unless agreed to in writing by Lessor. Lessee may not sublet Equipment subject to
this Agreement unless agreed to in writing by Lessor.
15. Lessee acknowledges this is a True Lease, and that ownership and title of any Equipment remains with Lessor, and Lessee has no right to
ownership or to transfer or sell the Equipment.
16. In the event of any dispute over this Agreement, the Parties agree to waive a trial by jury and that venue shall be in the County or Parish where the
Equipment was originally delivered.
17. To the extent permitted by applicable law, Lessee irrevocably and unconditionally authorizes Lessor to charge all amounts due under this
Agreement to any credit card provided by Lessee.
Williams Scotsman, Inc. 6400 E McDowell Rd., 3rd Floor, Scottsdale, AZ 85257
1-800-782-1500
Page 2 of 3
167
VIJ�LLSC4T
Your Sales Representative
Nadir Yusuf
+1 (763) 215-0017
nadir.yusof@willscot.com
Agreement Number: Q-2275332
Revision: 3
Date: 1/29/2026
Expiration Date: 2/27/2026
Billing & Payment Terms
1. Lessor reserves the right to request Payment in advance of the Delivery Date, and Lessee may be required to make payment in advance to secure
its performance of this Lease. Advance payments may include initial, final and/or recurring charges and will be applied to applicable invoices. Lessor
reserves the right to charge an administrative fee for special billing requests.
2. Invoices will be generated on a 28 Day Billing Cycle, in advance, with payment due no later than Net 10 Days after invoice issuance.
3. AMOUNTS UNPAID WHEN DUE SHALL BE CHARGED INTEREST OF UP TO 1'/2% PER BILLING CYCLE OF THE UNPAID AMOUNT FOR THE
PERIOD UNPAID , AND AN ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGE PER BILLING CYCLE THE INVOICE REMAINS UNPAID.
4. Initial Invoice Charges may include first and last Billing Cycle charges, delivery and installation charges, estimated charges for pick-up, teardown and
Equipment removal, as well as any fuel surcharges. Final charges for pick-up, teardown and Equipment removal will be finalized at the time of pick-up
based on existing site conditions. Upon the expiration of the Minimum Lease Term, the Lessor may make changes to the Lease rate, pick-up, teardown,
removal, fuel surcharges and/or other charges.
5. The Initial Invoice will be issued on the earlier of the confirmation date or Delivery Date. In the event Lessee requests a delay to the delivery, as
agreed to in the Confirmation, the Initial Invoice will be issued solely for the Equipment lease charges and a Storage Fee equal to 50% of the Lease,
and all remaining Initial Invoice Charges will be invoiced on the Delivery Date. Lessee agrees that upon Termination prior to the Minimum Lease Term,
Lessee shall pay the remaining payments for the unfulfilled Minimum Lease Term, and any applicable charges related to the Equipment, plus all return
charges.
Optional Insurance and Optional Coverage
General Liability Insurance
If (a.) quoted on the pricing page(s) or (b.) initialed in the optional section of the pricing page(s), Customer elects to participate in the General Liability
Insurance Program, whereby Lessee will receive insurance coverage through American Southern Insurance Company ("Insurer") and administered by
Allen Insurance Group ("Agent"). The Lessee acknowledges and agrees that the policy issued by the Insurer is a third party liability policy that covers
those amounts, subject to policy exclusions, that Lessee is legally obligated to pay due to bodily injury and property damage arising from the use and
occupancy of Equipment leased from Lessor up to the policy limits. Coverage is subject to underwriting and specific terms and conditions and exclusions
set forth in the policy. An outline of coverage is available upon request.
Loss Damage
If (a.) quoted on the pricing page(s) or (b.) initialed in the optional section of the pricing page(s), Lessee elects to participate in the Loss Damage Waiver
Program. Lessee understands and agrees that under this program and subject to any exclusions, the Lessor waives, for a fee, Lessee's obligation to
carry Commercial Property Insurance and Lessee's liability for repair or replacement of the Equipment leased from Lessor resulting in loss or damage.
Please refer to the LOSS DAMAGE WAIVER PROGRAM ADDENDUM for specific details on coverage, exclusions and restrictions on coverage. The
Loss Damage Waiver is not and shall not constitute a contract for insurance.
Contents Insurance
If (a.) quoted on the pricing page(s) or (b.) initialed in the optional section of the pricing page(s), Lessee elects to participate in the Contents Insurance
Coverage Program, whereby Lessee will receive insurance coverage through Airpark Insurance ("Insurer") and administered by Falvey Insurance
Group, Ltd. ("Falvey")) as Managing General Agent of those Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's, London ("Agent"). The Lessee acknowledges and
agrees that the policy issued by the Insurer is a third party property policy that, subject to policy exclusions, provides comprehensive contents coverage
and adds an additional layer of protection for the stored contents up to the selected limit of coverage. Coverage is subject to underwriting and specific
terms and conditions and exclusions set forth in the policy. An outline of coverage is available upon request.
Acceptance and Authority
Lessee represents and warrants they have the authority to agree to the terms and conditions stated in this Agreement by (1) signing this document, (2)
executing an Order that references this Agreement, (3) taking delivery of the Equipment, or (4) other commercially acceptable means methods and, by
doing so, this Agreement shall become legally binding. Lessor will consider the Order rejected if changes have been made to the Order by Lessee.
Lessee: City of Shakopee
Signature:
Date:
Print Name:
Title:
PO#:
Williams Scotsman, Inc. 6400 E McDowell Rd., 3rd Floor, Scottsdale, AZ 85257
1-800-782-1500
Page 3 of 3
168
WILLSCOT
TM
OMNIA
PARTNERS
We are proud to be the
exclusive provider of modular
buildings, portable storage
and relocatable walkways
to participants of OMNIA
Partners, Public Sector in all
48 contiguous states.
NATIONAL COOPERATIVE
CONTRACT
���iiuiiill IIIIIIII�I�II�
Classrooms
Storage Solutions
The contract provides modular products and services
to public agencies, educational institutions and non
profit organizations nationwide
The Cooperative Partnership
The OMNIA Partners contract provides the
ability to leverage the combined purchasing
power of over 55,000 government agencies
resulting in savings on every WillScot order.
Leverage the buying power of WillScot and
Omnia Partners today! Save time. Reduce
costs. Minimize hassles.
Products and Services include:
• Classrooms
• Libraries
• Administrative offices
• Daycare centers
• Stairs, steps and ramps
• Storage containers
• Fully furnished solutions
Providing value to our customers
is of utmost importance to us.
How do we achieve that?
• Being a trusted one source supplier for all
of your modular solution needs saves you
time and money
Working with an experienced sales, service
and administrative team guarantees you
get top notch advice, work and the modular
solution best suited to your needs
Serving the education sector and public
agencies for well over 50 years means we
understand your needs completely and
know how to get the job done right
800.782.1500 WILLSCOT.COM 169
NATIONAL COOPERATIVE CONTRACT
Our exclusive cooperative partnership streamlines the
solicitation process getting your employees to work faster.
Cooperative Process
O O O
Contact
vendor with
publicly
solicited and
awarded
contract
Vendor
submits
proposal
with number
Standard Process
Generate
requisition
0
Obtain
quotes
OMNIA
PARTNERS
O
Issue order
to approved
vendor
Initiate
solicitation
process
0
Ready To Work
❑❑0
0
Review
solicitations
0
Approve
solicitation
award
0 0
Issue
approved
PO to
vendor
Ready To Work
0 0 n
For more information or to request a visit from a WillScot
sales representative call 800-782-1500. If you would like to
learn more about OMNIA Partners, Public Sector and how to
participate, visit their website at:
omniapartners.com/publicsector or call 866-875-3299.
* Photos are representational; actual products vary.
Additional floor plans and specifications may vary from
those shown and are subject to in -stock availability
800.782.1500 I WILLSCOT.COM 170
Docusign Envelope ID: 43F9E656-E79D-482F-817E-C8A7215FAFFB
WI LLSCOT
Your Sales Representative
Nadir Yusuf
+1 (763) 215-0017
nadir.yusuf@willscot.com
Agreement Number: Q-2275332
Revision: 4
Date: 2/6/2026
Expiration Date: 2/27/2026
Master Lease Agreement and Order
Lessee:
City of Shakopee
485 Gorman St
Shakopee, MN 55379
Contact:
Torn Pitschneider
485 Gorman St
Shakopee, MN 55379, US
Phone: 9522339300
Email: tpitschneider@shakopeemn.gov
Ship To Address:
1001 Vierling Dr W
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379, US
Estimated Delivery Date :2/23/2026
Rental Pricing Per Billing Cycle
Quantity Price
Extended
70x14 Mobile Office or Similar
Air Purifier
Loss Damage Waiver (13+)
General Liability Insurance
Basic Entrance Package - Steps
Window/Door Security Bundle - 40ft & Greater
Minimum Lease Billing Period: 10
Billing Cycle : 28 days
anchor cost
included at
$1223
1 $ 1,999.00
1
1
1
2
1
$ 50.00
$ 219.00
$ 30.00
$ 130.00
$ 100.00
$ 1,999.00
$ 50.00
$ 219.00
$ 30.00
$ 260.00
$ 100.00
Total Recurring Building Charges:
Subtotal of Other Recurring Charges:
$ 1,999.00
$ 659.00
Total Recurring Charges Per Billing Cycle: $ 2,658.00
Total Recurring Charges Per Billing Cycle Including Estimated Taxes: $ 2,880.62
Estimated Delivery And Installation
Essentials Delivery Charge
Modification to Unit L
Delivery
Setup
Knockdown - estimated
Return - estimated
1
1
$ 0.00
$ 8,027.14
$ 0.00
$ 8,027.14
$ 615.00
$ 2,717.00
$ 900.00
$ 615.00
Total Delivery and Installation Charges:
$ 12,874.14
Total Delivery and Installation Charges Including Estimated Taxes:
$ 13,952.35
Estimated Final Return Charges*
Due On Final Invoice*:
$ 0.00
Due On Final Invoice Including Estimated Taxes*:
$ 0.00
Total Including Recurring Billing Charges, Delivery, Installation and Return**: $ 39,454.14
TotalTA4AI Including Recurring Q;II;....•. Charges, �AI�\IAM\I Installation and �A4..MM Including Estimated Taxes"":
Including. Recur inn B �g Charg. es, velive y, Installation and Rett. n Including. Estima ed T axes
c 42,758.55
$
Summary of Charges
Model: 70x14 Mobile Office or Similar
Quantity: 1
Total Charges for (1) Building(s): $ 39,454.14
Te�aI Charges for (1 ) B �ilrlivig(s) Including Estimated Tax: $ 42,758.55
• eau• Charges y'..' for i vui�uii iy�.�� �i iv�uuii iy Estimated iuwu u�. yi
Tax Exempt, provided ST3 form 2/24.
I attempted to do that, and the system doesn't allow it to be removed. I was told that you would
just use the line that doesn't have taxes included. It should read Total Including Recurring
Billing Charges, Delivery, Installation and Return.
NADIR YUSUF
Territory Sales Manager
Office:
800.782.1500
Cell: 763.215.0017
Nadir.Yusuf@willscot.com
Williams Scotsman, Inc. 6400 E McDowell Rd., 3rd Floor, Scottsdale, AZ 85257
1-800-782-1500
Page 1 of 3
172
Docusign Envelope ID: 43F9E656-E79D-482F-817E-C8A7215FAFFB
WILLSCOT I
Your Sales Representative
Nadir Yusuf
+1 (763) 215-0017
nadir.yusuf@willscot.com
Agreement Number: Q-2275332
Revision: 4
Date: 2/6/2026
Expiration Date: 2/27/2026
Master Lease Terms & Conditions
1. This Master Lease Agreement shall apply to any Order between Williams Scotsman, Inc. and/or any affiliate ("Lessor") and City of Shakopee
("Lessee") for any Equipment as defined below ("Agreement"). This Agreement and any Order governs Lessee's use of Lessor's Equipment. By
(1) signing this Agreement, (2) executing an Order that references this Agreement, (3) taking delivery of the Equipment, or (4) other commercially
acceptable methods of acceptance, Lessee agrees to the terms of this Agreement.
2. Definitions
a. "Delivery Date" shall be defined as the date the Equipment was physically delivered. Within 48 hours of delivery, Lessee shall inspect the
Equipment and notify Lessor in writing of any defects. Lessee must contact Lessor to relocate any Equipment and obtain Lessor's written consent prior
to doing so. Lessee shall pay Lessor's relocation rates if the Equipment is moved without Lessor's written consent. Lessee acknowledges that delivery of
Equipment may be in parts and not all at once.
b. "Equipment" means products leased from Lessor, which include Storage Containers, Refrigerated Storage Containers, Ground Level Offices
("GLO"), Modular Equipment, FLEX offices, Blast Resistant products, ancillary products and essentials, Additional Rental Equipment, and any additional
products or services available for Lease from Lessor at the time of an Order. Any Lease for Equipment such as an Over the Road Trailer, Temporary
Structure or other Equipment may be subject to an Addendum or Equipment specific terms and conditions. Lessee agrees Equipment shall not be used
for residential occupancy.
c. "Lease" is defined as any Order for the Lease of Equipment by Lessee from Lessor.
d. "Lessee" means in the case of an individual accepting this Agreement on his or her own behalf, such individual, or in the case of an individual
accepting this Agreement on behalf of a company or other legal entity, the company or other legal entity for which such individual is accepting this
Agreement, and affiliates of that company or entity (for so long as they remain affiliates), which have entered into an Order.
e. "Order" means a WillScot document or online Order forming an individual Lease, specifying the Equipment to be provided hereunder that is
entered into between Lessee and Lessor or any of their affiliates, including any addenda and supplements thereto. By entering into an Order hereunder,
the Lessee or it's affiliate agree to be bound by the terms of this Agreement as if it were an original party hereto.
3. Lessee is responsible for all site conditions, use permits, and applicable Fees, and maintains sole responsibility for site selection, which shall be a
flat, firm and open space, and prepared prior to Equipment Delivery as set forth in the Site Suitability Addendum, incorporated herein by reference.
4. If delivery of the Equipment is delayed through no fault of Lessor for a period of more than thirty (30) days from the confirmation date set forth in the
Order, Lessee shall pay Lessor a storage fee equal to 50% of the Total Lease Charges for each thirty (30) day period of delay, or portion thereof, until
the Equipment is delivered, in addition to any other Lease payments, charges and Fees due. Any such storage fees shall not affect commencement of
the Minimum Lease Term.
5. Lessee is responsible to inspect and maintain the Equipment in good condition. Lessee shall use the Equipment in accordance with and be
responsible for all maintenance as set forth in the Williams Scotsman Service Guide and/or any instructions contained in or on the Equipment.
6. Lessee shall maintain commercially reasonable insurance limits covering the Equipment's replacement cost. Lessee may obtain insurance for
their contents at their discretion or can elect to participate in an optional third -party Contents Insurance Program provided through Lessor for a fee.
Optional coverage programs offered to Lessee include General Liability, Loss Damage Waiver and Content Insurance. Details can be found at https://
www.willscot.com/the-essentials/insurance-and-waivers-package.
7. Lessee shall provide no less than 15 days prior notice to schedule a pick-up date, and no less than thirty (30) days prior notice for any multi -floor
Modular Equipment. Lessor shall not prorate any fraction of a Billing Cycle. Upon return, Lessee agrees to pay for all reasonable charges for cleaning,
repair, and any damage beyond ordinary wear and tear. Lessee may have the option to pick-up and/or return certain Equipment, which shall be subject
to signing an appropriate addendum.
8. LESSOR MAKES NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND LESSEE AGREES THAT IT HAS SOLELY DETERMINED THAT THE
EQUIPMENT ARE SUITABLE FOR LESSEE'S INTENDED USE. LESSEE LEASES THE EQUIPMENT "AS IS, WITH ALL FAULTS."
9. Each Party agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the other harmless for any third -party claim arising from the alleged conduct of the other Party
under this Agreement. Neither Party shall be liable to the other Party for any special, punitive, exemplary, indirect or consequential damages, losses or
damages for lost revenues or profits whether foreseeable or not, arising out of, or in connection with this Agreement.
10. This Agreement shall supersede and replace all prior documents and agreements between the Parties.
11. Lessee shall be solely liable for any and all applicable sales and use, lease or rental, excise, gross receipts, transaction privilege, value-added,
goods and services, or similar transactional tax, levy duty or assessment imposed by a taxing authority ("Taxes"). Lessee shall pay or shall reimburse
Lessor for any Taxes related to the Equipment.
12. Lessee's failure to make timely payments, filing of bankruptcy, abandonment of the Equipment or other failure to comply with this Agreement is
a default, allowing Lessor to immediately terminate this Agreement, at which time Lessor has the right to pick-up and remove the Equipment upon
reasonable notice or as required by law.
13. Lessee shall be solely liable for any and all applicable pass -through charges for costs associated with the Equipment including, but not limited
to, ad valorem, real property, and ownership tax/personal property taxes, licensing and titling Fees, and any other expenses and/or third -party Fees
associated with the Equipment ("Fees").
14. Except as otherwise stated herein, Lessor may amend the terms and conditions of this Agreement and such amended terms shall be effective thirty
(30) days after notice is provided to Lessee. If Lessee does not object in writing to such amended terms before their effective date, such terms shall be
deemed accepted. Lessee may not amend or assign this Agreement unless agreed to in writing by Lessor. Lessee may not sublet Equipment subject to
this Agreement unless agreed to in writing by Lessor.
15. Lessee acknowledges this is a True Lease, and that ownership and title of any Equipment remains with Lessor, and Lessee has no right to
ownership or to transfer or sell the Equipment.
16. In the event of any dispute over this Agreement, the Parties agree to waive a trial by jury and that venue shall be in the County or Parish where the
Equipment was originally delivered.
17. To the extent permitted by applicable law, Lessee irrevocably and unconditionally authorizes Lessor to charge all amounts due under this
Agreement to any credit card provided by Lessee.
Williams Scotsman, Inc. 6400 E McDowell Rd., 3rd Floor, Scottsdale, AZ 85257
1-800-782-1500
Page 2 of 3
173
Docusign Envelope ID: 43F9E656-E79D-482F-817E-C8A7215FAFFB
WILLSCOT I
Your Sales Representative
Nadir Yusuf
+1 (763) 215-0017
nadir.yusuf@willscot.com
Agreement Number: Q-2275332
Revision: 4
Date: 2/6/2026
Expiration Date: 2/27/2026
Billing & Payment Terms
1. Lessor reserves the right to request Payment in advance of the Delivery Date, and Lessee may be required to make payment in advance to secure
its performance of this Lease. Advance payments may include initial, final and/or recurring charges and will be applied to applicable invoices. Lessor
reserves the right to charge an administrative fee for special billing requests.
2. Invoices will be generated on a 28 Day Billing Cycle, in advance, with payment due no later than Net 10 Days after invoice issuance.
3. AMOUNTS UNPAID WHEN DUE SHALL BE CHARGED INTEREST OF UP TO 1'/2% PER BILLING CYCLE OF THE UNPAID AMOUNT FOR THE
PERIOD UNPAID , AND AN ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGE PER BILLING CYCLE THE INVOICE REMAINS UNPAID.
4. Initial Invoice Charges may include first and last Billing Cycle charges, delivery and installation charges, estimated charges for pick-up, teardown and
Equipment removal, as well as any fuel surcharges. Final charges for pick-up, teardown and Equipment removal will be finalized at the time of pick-up
based on existing site conditions. Upon the expiration of the Minimum Lease Term, the Lessor may make changes to the Lease rate, pick-up, teardown,
removal, fuel surcharges and/or other charges.
5. The Initial Invoice will be issued on the earlier of the confirmation date or Delivery Date. In the event Lessee requests a delay to the delivery, as
agreed to in the Confirmation, the Initial Invoice will be issued solely for the Equipment lease charges and a Storage Fee equal to 50% of the Lease,
and all remaining Initial Invoice Charges will be invoiced on the Delivery Date. Lessee agrees that upon Termination prior to the Minimum Lease Term,
Lessee shall pay the remaining payments for the unfulfilled Minimum Lease Term, and any applicable charges related to the Equipment, plus all return
charges.
Optional Insurance and Optional Coverage
General Liability Insurance
If (a.) quoted on the pricing page(s) or (b.) initialed in the optional section of the pricing page(s), Customer elects to participate in the General Liability
Insurance Program, whereby Lessee will receive insurance coverage through American Southern Insurance Company ("Insurer") and administered by
Allen Insurance Group ("Agent"). The Lessee acknowledges and agrees that the policy issued by the Insurer is a third party liability policy that covers
those amounts, subject to policy exclusions, that Lessee is legally obligated to pay due to bodily injury and property damage arising from the use and
occupancy of Equipment leased from Lessor up to the policy limits. Coverage is subject to underwriting and specific terms and conditions and exclusions
set forth in the policy. An outline of coverage is available upon request.
Loss Damage
If (a.) quoted on the pricing page(s) or (b.) initialed in the optional section of the pricing page(s), Lessee elects to participate in the Loss Damage Waiver
Program. Lessee understands and agrees that under this program and subject to any exclusions, the Lessor waives, for a fee, Lessee's obligation to
carry Commercial Property Insurance and Lessee's liability for repair or replacement of the Equipment leased from Lessor resulting in loss or damage.
Please refer to the LOSS DAMAGE WAIVER PROGRAM ADDENDUM for specific details on coverage, exclusions and restrictions on coverage. The
Loss Damage Waiver is not and shall not constitute a contract for insurance.
Contents Insurance
If (a.) quoted on the pricing page(s) or (b.) initialed in the optional section of the pricing page(s), Lessee elects to participate in the Contents Insurance
Coverage Program, whereby Lessee will receive insurance coverage through Airpark Insurance ("Insurer") and administered by Falvey Insurance
Group, Ltd. ("Falvey")) as Managing General Agent of those Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's, London ("Agent"). The Lessee acknowledges and
agrees that the policy issued by the Insurer is a third party property policy that, subject to policy exclusions, provides comprehensive contents coverage
and adds an additional layer of protection for the stored contents up to the selected limit of coverage. Coverage is subject to underwriting and specific
terms and conditions and exclusions set forth in the policy. An outline of coverage is available upon request.
Acceptance and Authority
Lessee represents and warrants they have the authority to agree to the terms and conditions stated in this Agreement by (1) signing this document, (2)
executing an Order that references this Agreement, (3) taking delivery of the Equipment, or (4) other commercially acceptable means methods and, by
doing so, this Agreement shall become legally binding. Lessor will consider the Order rejected if changes have been made to the Order by Lessee.
Lessee: City of Shakopee
Signature:
Date:
Print Name:
Title:
PO#:
Williams Scotsman, Inc. 6400 E McDowell Rd., 3rd Floor, Scottsdale, AZ 85257
1-800-782-1500
Page 3 of 3
174
Portable Restrooms
Luxury Trailers
Portable Sinks
Barricades
Temp Fence
6430 County Road 101 E Shakopee MN 55379 biffsinc.com 952.403.1221
Event Contract
Prepared February 2, 2026 by Shari Kvam, Special Event Sales 952.403.1221
FOR: Shakopee Fire Station 2
March 1- September 1, 2026
Equipment Rental 28day Rates
Weekly
Total
18' 3 Stall Shower/Restroom Trailer
26
$900.00
$23,400.00
Delivery/Set-up/Pickup
1
$200.00
$200.00
Clean/Stock/Pump
26
$200.00
$5,200.00
****3% Convenience Fee for all credit card payments. No Convenience Fee for ACH transfers, wire transfers, PayPal, debit cards, or checks
Equipment Requirements and Specifications: -2 dedicated 20amp circuit and hose spigot
within 75' of where trailer is placed. Initial
Terms and Conditions:
1. Only use our toilet paper supplied in stalls. Others will clog the unit.
2. Structural modification(s) to the trailer are prohibited.
3. All personal decorations must be removed prior to earliest pick-up time.
a. NO invisible 'scotch' tape. NO flame candles.
b. Tape that removes cleanly with no residue or surface damage is acceptable
(Multi -surface painter's tape). Flameless battery candles are acceptable.
4. Lessee is responsible for the cost of replacement and repairs due to fire, theft,
carelessness, accidental damage or vandalism. Lessee agrees to return rental equipment
to Biffs, Inc. in delivered condition, ordinary use and wear expected.
5. Lessee agrees to carry adequate insurance against personal injury, property damage and
public liability, which may be caused by Lessee's possession of said rental equipment
and expressly indemnifies Biffs, Inc. and its employees and representatives against any
claim for damage or loss.
6. Biffs is not responsible for property damage due to customer requested placement.
7. Failure to provide access to site will void guarantee of placement, service, or removal as
per schedule and may incur additional charges $150.00 Initial
8. Failure to meet power and water requirements at the time of delivery may incur
additional charges. This includes having generators ready to test power to trailer.
I have reviewed and accept the terms of this contract:
Lessee, or authorized representative
Signature Phone Date
175
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.o
March 3, 2026
Approve Municipal State Aid Street System Designations
Micah Heckman, Assistant City Engineer
Alex Jordan, City Engineer
Action to be considered:
Adopt Resolution R2026-026, approving Municipal State Aid Street System Designations.
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
The Municipal State Aid (MSA) Street program allows cities with populations of 5,000 or
more to designate 20% of its local streets as MSA routes. Based on several factors,
including the traffic volumes on the designated routes, the city receives an allocation of
state gas tax funding that can be used for roadway capital improvements and
maintenance needs on designated MSA routes.
Each year as Shakopee continues to develop and add additional roads, the city
accumulates mileage to add additional roadways to the state aid system. The City of
Shakopee currently has approximately 188 miles of municipal qualifying roadways, of
which 37.59 miles can be designated as MSA routes with a balance of 1.08 miles yet to be
designated.
The streets listed below meet MSA Street program criteria and are eligible for MSA street
designation. The system revision includes designating 1.08 miles as new MSA streets. The
proposed MSA Street System revisions can be used in calculating Shakopee's 2027 MSA
allotment and and leaves 0.00 miles left for future designation.
MSAS Mileage Designation Proposed:
• Astoria Drive: Zumbro Avenue to Marystown Road (CSAH 15)
• Zumbro Avenue: Astoria Drive to 130th Street (CSAH 78)
• Disc Drive: 12th Avenue to Canterbury Road (CSAH 83)
Recommendation:
176
Adopt Resolution R2026-026.
Budget Impact:
None.
Attachments:
Resolution R2026-026
Proposed MSA Route Designations Map
177
RESOLUTION R2026-026
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET
SYSTEM DESIGNATIONS
WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of Shakopee that the streets hereinafter should
be designated Municipal State Aid Streets under the provisions of Minnesota Law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, By the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota that
the roads be described as follows, to -wit:
MSAS Mileage Designation Proposed:
• Astoria Drive: Zumbro Avenue to Marystown Road/CSAH 15
• Zumbro Avenue: Astoria Drive to 130th Street/CSAH 78
• Disc Drive: 12th Avenue to Canterbury Road/CSAH 83
be, and hereby are established, located and designated as Municipal State Aid Streets of said City,
subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified
copies of this resolution to the Commissioner of Transportation for consideration, and that upon
approval of the designation of said roads or portions thereof, that same be constructed, improved and
maintained as Municipal State Aid Streets of the City of Shakopee, to be numbered and known as a
Municipal State Aid Street.
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 3rd
day of March 2026.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Prepared by:
City of Shakopee
485 Gorman Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
178
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 11.a
March 3, 2026
2025 Community Survey Update
Chelsea Petersen, Assistant City Administrator
Action to be considered:
N/A
Motion Type:
Informational only
Background:
Every two years the City of Shakopee engages in a survey through The National
Community Survey (NCS). The most recent survey was conducted between October and
November of 2025. Surveys were mailed to 3,000 randomly selected residential addresses
in the community, and 407 were completed and returned. When adjusting for those that
were returned due to being undeliverable, Shakopee had a 14% response rate. Selected
addresses had the option to fill out the survey and mail it back or complete it online.
Additionally, once the randomly selected addresses had the opportunity to participate, an
open participation option was posted on the city's website as well as advertised through
our social media platforms in order to solicit additional community participation. All
responses are anonymous, and for purposes of statistical significance the results were
kept separate by participation type (random selection vs open participation).
There are two primary benefits of using a consistent survey tool: seeing local trends over
time, and comparing to national benchmarks over time. Shakopee has used this same
tool six times since 2014, and there are now over 600 communities that also use NCS, so
the comparable group continues to grow.
The full report is attached, and is also available to the public via the city's website. The
survey tool asks questions on many aspects of community livability including safety,
economy, mobility, natural environment, amenities, and other categories that contribute
to making a community desirable. While the report contains a significant amount of
information, the following items were outlined as key findings:
1. Residents appreciate a high quality of life and strong sense of community.
a. 91% would recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks, and 87%
planned to remain in Shakopee for the next five years.
180
b. 56% gave positive ratings for their sense of civic/community pride, which was a
significant increase from the last survey cycle.
c. Residents' connection and engagement with their community also increased
significantly from 49% to 59% favorable.
2. Economic Health and employment opportunities have grown.
a. 69% rated working in Shakopee as excellent or good.
b. Employment opportunities got a 64% positive rating, which is both a 10 -point
increase from our 2023 survey, and higher than the national average.
c. Ratings related to cost of living had a 49% favorable rating, which is also a
significant increase from 2023 and higher than the national benchmarks.
3. Governance shows significant improvement since 2023.
a. Overall customer service by city employees received an 85% favorable rating.
b. The job Shakopee government does at welcoming resident involvement
received a 67% favorable rating, which is a 10 -point increase from 2023.
c. The overall confidence in Shakopee government received a 62% favorable
response, which is a 10 -point increase from last survey cycle.
4. Diversity, inclusion, and resident engagement are highly valued.
a. Making all residents feel welcome rose by 12 points to 77% favorable.
b. Ratings related to valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds
increased from 67% to 74% in 2025.
5. Residents feel safe across the community.
a. The overall feeling of safety in our community is generally strong, and there
were several specific items that saw significant increases since the 2023
survey: feeling safe from property crime, police/sheriff services, crime
prevention, and animal control.
b. Ratings for feeling safe from fire, flood, or other natural disasters were also
higher than the national benchmarks.
c. Emergency preparedness also saw a significant increase with 75% of residents
now rating that area favorably.
In addition to the standard questions that measure against national benchmarks, the city
typically includes custom questions on a timely project or topic. In 2025 Shakopee asked
questions relating to public safety and communications.
• When asked about response times in relation to cost for emergency services, the
community strongly supported (88%) maintaining response times and costs,
opposed (70%) longer response times at lower costs, and favored (51 %) the city
striving to shorten response times even if it came with a property tax increase. In
the open participation survey those same response categories were 87% support of
maintaining current times and costs, 83% opposing longer times at lower costs, and
53% supporting striving to shorten times even if it comes with an increased cost.
• When it came to how much residents may support or oppose property tax increases
for increased roadway improvements and/or improvements to public safety
181
facilities, vehicles, and equipment, the greatest level of support (76%) was for a $24
annual/$2 monthly increase per $100,000 in property/home value. That support was
greater than the highest level of opposition (73%) at a $96 annual/$8 monthly
increase per $100,000 in value. Those values were 77% and 78% respectively in the
open participation survey.
• When it comes to obtaining city information, the city's website is the most significant
source of news and information (90%), social media channels are next (78%),
followed by other direct mailers and local media outlets (both 70%). The City website
(90%) and social media channels (86%) were also the largest sources of information
in the open participation group.
Recommendation:
N/A
Budget Impact:
N/A
Attachments:
Shakopee by the Numbers - 2025 Community Survey Flyer
The NCS Report - Shakopee, MN 2025
182
Shakopee by the Numbers
ya
r
Based on the City of Shakopee 2025 Community Survey, these results reflect how residents
experience life in our community. To explore the full survey and compare results to past
years and national benchmarks, visit ShakopeeMN.gov/citysurvey.
*tilt
*tilt
RESIDENTS LOVE SHAKOPEE
91% of residents stated they would
recommend Shakopee as a place to live.
OUR ECONOMY IS RESILIENT
Residents ranked Shakopee higher than
the national average for economic health
and employment opportunities.
Police Services
86% good or excellent
Fire Services
87% good or excellent
12% increase in approval of local
business variety
1. 10% increase in quality of
employment opportunities
1. 8% increase in rating cost of living
as good or excellent
SHAKOPEE IS A SAFE COMMUNITY
92% of residents said they feel safe in their
neighborhoods, with 82% reporting an
overall sense of safety in Shakopee.
183
*II) A
**Wit in
OUR CITY IS WELL DESIGNED
7 in 10 rated the overall design and layout
of residential and commercial areas in
Shakopee as excellent or good, with 86%
rating their neighborhood as such.
GOVERNANCE: TRUST IS RISING
Significant improvement since 2023, even
as national trends decline. Residents are
experiencing stronger service and greater
trust in our local Shakopee government.
Sidewalk Upkeep: + 10%
Traffic Enforcement: + 7%
Street Repair: + 5%
Snow Removal: + 9%
Customer service delivered by
City employees: + 8%
Being open and transparent
to the public: + 10%
Confidence in your City
I government: + 10%
STREET SERVICES ARE TOP NOTCH
The City's efforts to increase the ease of
mobility throughout the community
earned high marks. Street repair and street
cleaning both exceeded national scores.
SHAKOPEE FEELS LIKE HOME
More residents feel welcome in Shakopee
than ever before, up 12% since 2023, and
87% say they are likely to call it home for at
least the next five years.
Rated Above National Benchmarks:
Well -planned residential growth
Variety of housing options
Availability of affordable, quality
housing
To explore the full survey and compare local results to
national benchmarks, visit ShakopeeMN.gov/citysurvey.
SHAKOPEE
INNOVATING. ENTERTAINING_ THRIVING.
184
Tm
THE N CS
THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY SURVEY"
Shakopee, MN
The National Community Survey
Report of Results
2025
Report by:
�.= National
Research
Center
POWERED BY POLCO
0 Polco
Visit us online!
www.polco.us
Charter Members
AAP R.
Transparency
Initiative
National Research Center at Polco
is a charter member of the AAPOR
Transparency Initiative, providing
clear disclosure of our sound and
ethical survey research practices.
185
Table of Contents
AboutTheNCSTM 1
- Purpose of the Survey
- How Results Are Reported
- Comparisons to Benchmarks
- Trends Over Time
Methods 3
- Selecting the Survey Recipients
- Conducting the Survey
- Analyzing the Data
- Contact Information
- Study Limitations
- Survey Validity
Key Findings 6
- Community Strengths
- Focus Areas
- Other Notable Results
- Areas of Greatest Change
Facets of Livability 8
- Overview and Gap Analysis
- Quality and Importance Ratings
Quality of Life
Governance
Economy
Mobility
Community Design
Utilities
Safety
Natural Environment
Parks and Recreation
Health and Wellness
Education, Arts, and Culture
Inclusivity and Engagement
Custom Questions
Copy of Survey Instrument
9
10
12
14
16
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
27
30
186
About The NCSTM
The National Community SurveyTM (The NCSTM) report is about the
"livability" of Shakopee. A livable community is a place that is not simply
habitable, but that is desirable. It is not only where people do live, but where
they want to live. The NCS was developed by the experts from National
Research Center at Polco in partnership with the International City/County
Management Association (ICMA) and has been administered in hundreds of
communities across the United States.
Great communities are partnerships of the government, private sector,
community -based organizations and residents, all geographically connected.
The NCS focuses on the livability of Shakopee by categorizing survey
questions into the ten main "facets" of community livability shown below, in
addition to ratings for quality of life and local governance. These facets have
been identified through years of extensive survey research as those that are
most impactful to residents' quality of life.
• Economy
• Mobility
• Community Design
• Utilities
• Safety
• Natural Environment
• Parks and Recreation
• Health and Wellness
• Education, Arts, and Culture ..
01* Polco
THE NATIONAL COMM U NIY SURVEY -
The report provides the opinions of a representative sample of 407 residents of the City of Shakopee collected
from October 2nd, 2025 to November 13th, 2025. The margin of error around any reported percentage is 4.9% for
all respondents. Survey results were weighted so that the demographic profile of respondents was representative
of the demographic profile of adults in Shakopee.
Reporting Results
For the most part, the percentages presented in this report represent the "percent positive." Most commonly, the
percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (excellent/good, very
safe/somewhat safe, etc.). On many of the questions in the survey, respondents may answer "don't know." The
proportion of respondents giving a "don't know" response is shown in the full set of responses included in the
"Complete Data" section; however, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the main
body of the report. Therefore, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion
about a specific item.
Benchmark Comparisons
Polco's database of comparative resident opinion is comprised of resident perspectives gathered in surveys from
over 400 communities whose residents evaluated the same kinds of topics on The NCS. The comparison
evaluations include surveys from the past five years. If a jurisdiction has conducted multiple efforts in the past five
years, only the most recent survey is included in the benchmark database. Polco adds the latest results quickly
upon survey completion, keeping the benchmark data fresh and relevant. The communities in the database
represent a wide geographic and population range.
In each tab, Shakopee's results are noted as being "higher" than the benchmark, "lower" than the benchmark, or
"similar" to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Shakopee residents. Being rated as "higher"
or "lower" than the benchmark means that Shakopee's average rating for a particular item was more than 10 points
different than the benchmark. If a rating was "much higher" or "much lower," then Shakopee's average rating was
more than 20 points different when compared to the benchmark.
187
In addition to these national benchmarks, comparisons were also made to a smaller cohort of communities that
align more closely to the demographics in Shakopee. This cohort included Bloomington, Cottage Grove, Eagan,
Eden Prairie, Edina, Faribault, Hastings, Lakeville, Mankato, Maple Grove, Maplewood, New Brighton, Oakdale,
Prior Lake, Ramsey, Richfield, Rosemount, Savage, Shoreview, West St. Paul and Woodbury. Comparisons to
these communities can be found throughout the report and in the Custom Benchmarks tab.
Trends over time
Trend data for Shakopee represent important comparison data and should be examined for improvements or
declines.' Deviations from stable trends over time represent opportunities for understanding how local policies,
programs, or public information may have affected residents' opinions. Changes between survey years have been
noted with an arrow and the percent difference. If the difference is greater than 6.9 percentage points between the
2023 and 2025 surveys, the change is statistically significant.
1. In 2020, The NCS survey was updated to include new and refreshed items. Consequently, some of the trends may be impacted due to wording
modifications that could have potentially altered the meaning of the item for the respondent.
2
188
Methods
Selecting Survey Recipients
All households within the City of Shakopee were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within
the zip codes serving Shakopee was purchased from Polco's mailing vendor, based on updated listings from the
United States Postal Service.
Since some of the zip codes that serve Shakopee households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the
community, the exact geographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the
most current municipal boundary file. Addresses located outside of Shakopee boundaries were removed from the
list of potential households to survey. From that list, addresses were randomly selected as survey recipients, with
multi -family housing units sampled at a rate of 5:3 compared to single family housing units.
Conducting the Random Sample Survey
The 3000 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on October 2nd, 2025 and data collection for
the survey remained open for six weeks. The first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate in the
survey online. The next mailing contained a cover letter with instructions, the survey questionnaire, and a postage -
paid return envelope. All mailings included a web link to give residents the opportunity to respond to the survey
online, as well as QR codes to further encourage participation.
About 0.43% of the 3000 mailed invitations were returned because the household address was vacant or the postal
service was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 2987 households that received the
invitations to participate, 407 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 14%.The response rate
was calculated using AAPOR's response rate #2 for mailed surveys of unnamed persons.
It is customary to describe the precision of estimates by a "level of confidence" and accompanying "confidence
interval" (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is 95%. The 95% confidence
interval quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the survey results based on the total number of responses
received. This is because some residents' opinions are relied on to estimate all residents' opinions. The margin of
error for the City of Shakopee survey is no greater than plus or minus 4.9 percentage points around any given
percent reported for all respondents (407 completed surveys).
Conducting the Open Participation Survey
In addition to the randomly selected "probability sample" of households, a link to an online open -participation survey
was publicized by the City of Shakopee. The open -participation survey was identical to the random sample survey,
with two small updates; it asked a question to confirm the respondent was a resident of Shakopee and also a
question about where they heard about the survey.
The open -participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on October 30th, 2025. The
survey remained open for two weeks and 123 responses were received. The data presented in the following report
excludes the open participation survey data, but the online report includes a tab which provides the complete open
participation results.
Analyzing the Data
Responses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a "key and verify" method, where all
responses are entered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the
original survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from
surveys completed on Polco were downloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses.
The survey datasets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social
Sciences (SPSS), R, Python, and Tableau.
The demographics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2020 Census and 2023
American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Shakopee. The primary objective of weighting
survey data is to make the survey respondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The
characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, housing type, and housing tenure. No
3
189
adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated using an iterative, multiplicative raking model
known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.2 The results of the weighting scheme for the probability sample are
presented in the following table.
Polco aligns demographic labels with those used by the U.S. Census for reporting purposes, when possible.
Some categories (age, race/Hispanic origin, housing type, and length of residency) are combined into smaller
subgroups.
Unweighted
Weighted
Target 4
Age
18-34
9%
31%
31%
35-54
33%
45%
44%
55+
58%
24%
26%
Hispanic
origin
No
95%
92%
92%
Yes
5%
8%
8%
Housing
tenure
Own
97%
83%
77%
Rent
3%
17%
23%
Housing type Attached
22%
38%
38%
Detached
78%
62%
62%
Race &
Hispanic
.
ong. in
Not white alone
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino
10%
90%
34%
66%
33%
67%
Sex
Man
42%
48%
48%
Woman
58%
52%
52%
Sex/age
Man 18-34
3%
14%
15%
Man 35-54
14%
22%
21%
Man 55+
26%
11%
12%
Woman 18-34
6%
16%
16%
Woman 35-54
19%
23%
23%
Woman 55+
32%
13%
13%
Study Limitations
All public opinion research is subject to unmeasured error. While the methodologies employed for this survey were
designed to minimize this error as much as possible, these other sources of potential error should be
acknowledged, and can include non -response error, coverage error, recall bias and social desirability bias.
Non -response error arises when those who were selected to participate in the survey did not do so, and may4have
190
different opinions or experiences that survey responders. For general resident surveys, where the results are
meant to be generalized to the entire adult population living in households, the mailing lists based on the Delivery
Sequence File from the United States Post Office may exclude certain types of housing units, such as those in
multi -family buildings where mail is addressed to a named resident at the address rather than to a specific unit or
where residents only receive their mail at a post office box and the geographic location of a residence cannot be
determined, there may be a coverage error, although for most locations, this is minimal. Respondents may not
perfectly remember their experiences in the past year (such as participation in social or civic events, for example),
and for some survey items, they may answer in ways they think cast their responses in a more favorable light
(recall bias and social desirability bias).
Survey Validity
See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity at https://blog.polco.us/polco-knowledgebase/margin-of-
error-and-confidence-level-in-survey-results
Contact
The City of Shakopee funded this research. Please contact Chelsea Petersen of the City of Shakopee at
cpetersen@shakopeemn.gov if you have any questions about the survey.
1. See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at https://aapor.org/standards-and-ethics/standard-definitions/
2. Pasek, J. (2014). ANES Weighting Algorithm. Retrieved from https://surveyinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Full-anesrake-paper.pdf
3. Targets come from the 2020 Census and 2023 American Community Survey
5
191
Key Findings
Community Strengths
Residents continue to appreciate a high quality of life and strong sense of community.
• Most participants positively rated Shakopee as a place to live, with over 8 in 10 sharing a favorable view.
• Nearly all respondents indicated they would recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks (91 %) and planned to remain in the
community for the next five years (87%).
• Sense of civic/community pride improved, with about 6 in 10 (56%) giving positive ratings, a significant increase from 2023 (49%).
• Ratings for residents' connection and engagement with their community also increased significantly since 2023, rising from 49% to
59%.
Economic health and employment opportunities have grown.
• Ratings for the overall economic health rose sharply (up 10%), with about 8 in 10 (75%) respondents giving positive reviews.
• About two-thirds of community members (69%) rated working in Shakopee as excellent or good, also trending upwards since 2023.
• Employment opportunities received about 6 in 10 positive ratings (64%), a 10 -point increase since 2023, and higher than the national
average.
• Cost of living ratings improved (up 8 -percentage points), with about half (49%) responding favorably, which was also higher than the
national benchmark.
Governance shows significant improvement since 2023.
• At a time when trust in governance is wavering nationally, ratings for multiple items related to Shakopee governance have increased
including:
• Overall customer service by Shakopee employees (85%; an 8 -point increase)
• The job Shakopee government does at welcoming resident involvement (67%; a 10 -point increase)
• Overall confidence in Shakopee government (62%; a 10 -point increase)
• Being honest (63%; an 11 -point increase)
Diversity, inclusion, and resident engagement are highly valued.
• Many respondents felt the City was attracting people from diverse backgrounds, with 8 in 10 rating this item positively, a notable
increase since 2023 and higher than both the national and custom benchmarks.
• Making all residents feel welcome climbed by 12 points to 77% positive as compared to 2023's rating.
• Positive ratings for valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds increased from 67% in 2023 to 74% in 2025.
Residents feel safe across the community.
• The overall feeling of safety remained strong, with roughly 8 in 10 residents responding positively.
• Several items regarding safety have increased significantly since 2023 including:
• Feeling safe from property crime (80%)
• Police/Sheriff services (86%)
• Crime prevention (78%)
• Animal control (82%)
• Ratings for feeling safe from fire, flood, or other natural disaster were higher than the national benchmark, with 9 in 10 community membi 192
rating it positively.
6
Focus Areas
Transportation and mobility may present opportunities for growth.
• While most respondents found ease of travel by car positive (88%; higher than the national benchmark), the ease of travel by public
transportation declined significantly since 2023 (down 14%), with only about 4 in 10 respondents providing positive ratings.
• Relatedly, the quality of bus or transit services significantly declined since 2023 (62% to 45%).
Affordability highlights potential areas for improvement.
• Availability of affordable quality housing, while higher than the national benchmark, remains relatively low with fewer than half (44%)
rating it positively.
• Similarly, ratings for the availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool have decreased since 2023, with less than 4 in 10
residents rating it positively
Other Notable Results
• Most respondents indicated a strong preference for the City to maintain current response times and costs for services regarding public
safety (88%), while 70% of residents oppose accepting longer response times at lower costs.
• Overall, residents supported minor increases in property/home value taxes to improve city services, with 76% supporting $24 annual/$2
monthly increase per $100,000 in property/home value and 57% supporting $48 annual/$4. monthly increase per $100,000 in
property/home value.
• When asked about city communication, residents most frequently relied on the city website (58% major source) and City social media
(Facebook, Instagram, Linkedln; 44% major source) for information.
Areas of Greatest Change
Of the 123 evaluative questions included on both the 2023 and 2025 survey iterations, 76 were statistically similar to previous results.
Upward trends were seen in 44 items, while 3 ratings decreased since 2023. The most significant of those trends are listed below.
Increases
• Shakopee open space (+18%)
• Animal control (+15%)
• Preservation of natural areas (open space, farmlands, and greenbelts; +14%)
• Making all residents feel welcome (+12%)
Decreases
• Bus or transit services (-17%)
• Ease of travel by public transportation in Shakopee (-14%)
• Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool (-13%)
7
193
Facets of Livability PvIcv
Every jurisdiction must balance limited resources while meeting resident needs and striving to optimize community
livability. To this end, it is helpful to know what aspects of the community are most important to residents and which
they perceive as being of higher or lower quality. It is especially helpful to know when a facet of livability is
considered of high importance but rated as lower quality, as this should be a top priority to address.
Quality and Importance by the Numbers
The table below shows the proportion of residents who rated the community facets positively for quality and the
priority (importance) placed on each. Also displayed is whether local quality ratings were lower, similar, or higher
than communities across the country (the national benchmark).
Quality
% excellent or good
83%
82%
78%
75%
73%
73%
70%
64%
64%
59%
Facet of Livability
Parks and Recreation
Safety
Health and Wellness
Economy
Natural Environment
Utilities
Community Design
Mobility
Education, Arts, and Culture
Inclusivity and Engagement
Importance
% essential or very important
76%
94%
75%
94%
j83%
92 0
]79%
67%
68%
168%
vs. national benchmark vs. national benchmark
Similar ❑ Similar
Quality/Importance Gap Analysis
The gap analysis chart below shows the same data as above; however, this chart more clearly illustrates the
comparative differences in quality and importance ratings for each facet, as well as the absolute ratings for each.
Safety
Quality
Importance
0 82%
94% 0
Economy
Quality
Importance
0 75%
94% 0
Utilities
Quality
Importance
073%
092%
Natural Environment
Quality
Importance
Community Design
Quality
Importance
073%
070%
083%
O 79%
Parks and Recreation
Quality
Importance
076%
083%
Health and Wellness
Quality
Importance
0 78%
O 75%
Education, Arts, and Culture Quality
Importance
064%
0 68%
Inclusivity and Engagement Quality
Importance
0 59%
0 68%
Mobility
Quality
Importance
0 64%
067%
❑ Quality ❑ Importance
8
194
The overall quality of life in Shakopee, 2025
Quality of Life
Measuring community livability starts with
assessing the quality of life of those who live there,
and ensuring that the community is attractive,
accessible, and welcoming to all.
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
3%
Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee.
(% excellent or good)
2021 2023 2025
25%
21%
51%
vs. national vs. custom
benchmark8 benchmark9
88%' • • 85%
84%
Shakopee as a place to live
The overall quality of life
85% 76%
77%
Simi- Similar
Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following.
(% very or somewhat likely)
Recommend living in Shakopee to
someone who asks
2021 2023 2025
+ •91%
87% 89%
Similar Similar
79%
Remain in Shakopee for the next five years
87%
87%
Similar Similar
Please rate each of the following in the Shakopee community.
(% excellent or good)
2021 2023 2025
Overall image or reputation
62% 63%
71%
c,ir�nilar
8. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
9. Comparison to the custom benchmark is shown. A description of the custom benchmark cohort can be found in the About section of the report.
If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
9
195
Overall confidence in Shakopee government,
2025
Governance
Strong local governments deliver results that meet
residents' needs, use resources effectively, and
respond to both current and future community
priorities.
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
3
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee.
(% excellent or good)
Public information services
Overall customer service by Shakopee
employees
2021 2023 2025
73%
70% 64%
84% o • 85%
77/0
1'
15%
13%
47%
25%
vs. national vs. custom
benchmark10 benchmark"
Please rate the following categories of Shakopee government performance.
(% excellent or good)
2021 2023 2025
The value of services for the taxes paid to
Shakopee
•
56% 54%
Dil nildi oil iiilar
The overall direction that Shakopee is taking
59%
55%
63%
Similar Similar
67%
The job Shakopee government does at o 57%
welcoming resident involvement
50/°
Similar Similar
62%
Overall confidence in Shakopee government 49% 52% 171
63%
Generally acting in the best interest of the 59% 54%
community
55%
Being honest 52%
63%
Similar Similar
Similar
Similar Simile_
10
196
Being open and transparent to the public
52% 56%
Similar Similar
46%
Informing residents about issues facing the
community
53%
47% Similar Similar
64%
67% Similar Similar
Treating all residents fairly 53%
46%
74%
Treating residents with respect
72%
63%
Simif
Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months.
(% yes)
Attended a local public meeting
2021 2023 2025
13%
19% 12%
Contacted Shakopee elected officials to
18% 10%
express your opinion 11%
• '41%
Contacted the City of Shakopee for help or 38% 37%
information
Watched a local public meeting
20% 20%
14% Lower Similar
Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following?
(% excellent or good)
The City of Shakopee
2021 2023 2025
76%
69% 68%
Similar
The Federal Government
40%
37%
35%
�r Filar Similar
10. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
11. Comparison to the custom benchmark is shown. A description of the custom benchmark cohort can be found in the About section of the report.
If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
11
197
Overall economic health of Shakopee, 2025
Economy
Local governments work together with private and
nonprofit businesses, and with the community at large, to
foster sustainable growth, create jobs, and promote a
thriving local economy.
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
•
4%
16%
20%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole.
(% excellent or good)
Overall economic health
2021 2023 2025
69%• 75%
65%
59%
vs. national vs. custom
benchmark12 benchmark13
3imila
Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee.
(% excellent or good)
Shakopee as a place to work
2021 2023 2025
74% • 69%
o Similar
60/0
71% 76% 79% Higher
Shakopee as a place to visit
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee.
(% excellent or good)
2021 2023 2025
Economic development
66%' 620 •68%
/o
Please rate each of the following in the Shakopee community.
(% excellent or good)
Overall quality of business and service
establishments
2021
77%
2023 2025
'72%
69%
Similar Similar
12
198
67%
57%
Variety of business and service
establishments
55%
Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area
46%
59%
X58%
Employment opportunities
Shopping opportunities
Cost of living
58%
54%
64%
49%. _
47%
X46%
53%
41%
49%
il
Higher
Similar Similar
Higher
What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do
you think the impact will be:
(% very or somewhat positive)
2021 2023 2025
37%
What impact, if any, do you think the
economy will have on your family
income in the next 6 months?
23%
12. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
13. Comparison to the custom benchmark is shown. A description of the custom benchmark cohort can be found in the About section of the report.
If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
13
199
Overall quality of the transportation system in
Shakopee, 2025
Mobility
The ability of residents to move about their
community with ease plays an important role in
the overall quality of life for everyone who lives,
works, and spends time there.
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
in 9%
15%
27%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole.
(% excellent or good)
Overall quality of the transportation
system
2021 2023 2025
62%• �• 64%
65%
48%
vs. national vs. custom
benchmark14 benchmark15
Simifr
Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community.
(% excellent or good)
Traffic flow on major streets
Ease of public parking
2021
78%•-
2023
66%
77%• _
• _
71%
2025
—•63%
• 72% Higher
92%
Ease of travel by car
87%
• 88% Higher Simile
Ease of travel by public transportation
Ease of travel by bicycle
Ease of walking
52%
47%
38%
Similar Similar
72%. • • 70%
63%
Higher
78%' • • 74%
77%
Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months.
(% yes)
14
200
2021 2023 2025
Used public transportation instead of
driving
5%
21%
•21%
Carpooled with other adults or children
instead of driving alone
Walked or biked instead of driving
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee.
(% excellent or good)
47%
35%
43%
Similar Similar
Similar Similar
59% ° 62% Similar Similar
Traffic enforcement
Traffic signal timing
Street repair
Street cleaning
Street lighting
Snow removal
Sidewalk maintenance
Bus or transit services
2021
70%•
2023 2025
• 67%
•
60%
63%' _
• •61%
57%
59%. _
62%
• 67%
82%* _
•
77%
•81%
Similar Similar
Similar Similar
Higher Similar
Higher Similar
75%• _
•
69%
• 74%
75%.
•
73%
• 82%
75%. • 73%
•
63%
Similar Similar
Similar Similar
Similar Similar
58%
62%
45%
Similar Similt.,
14. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
15. Comparison to the custom benchmark is shown. A description of the custom benchmark cohort can be found in the About section of the report.
If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
15
201
Overall design or layout of Shakopee's residential
and commercial areas, 2025
Community Design
A well -designed community enhances the
quality of life for its residents by
encouraging smart land use and zoning,
ensuring that affordable housing is
accessible to all, and supporting
development that suits residents' needs.
Excellent 19%
Good
Fair
Poor
8%
22%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole.
e/0 excellent or good)
2021 2023 2025
65%• 70%
Overall design or layout of residential and 59%
commercial areas
51%
vs. national vs. custom
benchmark's benchmark"
Simile -
Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee.
(% excellent or good)
Your neighborhood as a place to live
2021 2023 2025
83%• • • 86% Similar Similar
79%
Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community.
(% excellent or good)
Well -planned residential growth
Well -planned commercial growth
2021 2023 2025
59%• • • 59% Higher Similar
58%
59%
58%
53%
Simil Similar
Well -designed neighborhoods
66%• • 66%
62%
Similar
Preservation of the historical or cultural
character of the community
67%, • 66% Similar Simi
65%
16
202
62%. _
Public places where people want to spend
time
•
58%
•62%
Variety of housing options
Availability of affordable quality housing
Overall quality of new development
Overall appearance
68%
57%
61%
Higher imiia
54%
67%
37%
54%
44%
61%
Higher Similar
Similar Similar
72%' 74%
66%
Similar Similar
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee.
(% excellent or good)
Land use, planning and zoning
2021
51%
2023 2025
59%
54%
Similar Similar
53%
Code enforcement
50%
41%
Similar Simi
16. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
17. Comparison to the custom benchmark is shown. A description of the custom benchmark cohort can be found in the About section of the report.
If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
17
203
Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in
Shakopee, 2025
Utilities
Access to essential services like water, gas,
electricity, and internet is crucial for
safeguarding the physical health, economic
stability, and overall well-being of the
communities they support.
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
mil 19%
6%
711 22%
AIM 54%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole.
C/0 excellent or good)
vs. national vs. custom
2021 2023 2025 benchmark's benchmark's
Overall quality of the utility infrastructure
73%' • •73% Similar Similar
71%
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee.
(% excellent or good)
2021 2023 2025
Affordable high-speed internet access
50%
52%
58%
Similar Similar
79%
Garbage collection
71%
84%
Similar Similar
Drinking water
Sewer services
62%
60%' •59% Similar Similar
83%' _
• •79% Similar Similar
78%
Storm water management
Power (electric and/or gas) utility
85%' _
•
78%
'84%
Similar Similar
82%6 _
• •79% Similar Similar
76%
73%
Utility billing 65%
64%
Similar Sir,
18. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
19. Comparison to the custom benchmark is shown. A description of the custom benchmark cohort can be found in the About section of the report.
If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
18
204
Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee, 2025
Safety
Public safety is one of the most important
responsibilities of local governments, as every
resident deserves to feel safe and secure both
in their neighborhoods and across the wider
community. The provision of strong, reliable
safety services is essential to ensuring a high
quality of life.
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
5%
13%
26%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole.
(% excellent or good)
2021 2023 2025
56%
vs. national vs. custom
benchmark20 benchmark21
78%. • • 82%
77%
Overall feeling of safety
Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel:
(% very or somewhat safe)
In your neighborhood during the
day
2021 2023 2025
94%. • • 92% Similar Similar
91%
In Shakopee's
downtown/commercial area during
the day
93%. •90%
92%
Similar Similar
From property crime
From violent crime
From fire, flood, or other natural
disaster
72%
80%
72%
Similar Similar
81%. _
• •83%
87%
Ski mai
89%. _
88%
•91% Higher
19
205
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee.
(% excellent or good)
2021 2023 2025
Police/Sheriff services
8 •78%
0%•
• Similar Similar
Crime prevention 71%
88%• • 86%
78% �!
Similar
Siri mai
82%
Animal control 66%
•82%
93%' •
Ambulance or emergency medical 85%
services
•91%
Similar Similar
Similar Similar
Fire services
Fire prevention and education
Emergency preparedness
93%. _
• •87%
87%
Similar Similar
86%• • •81%
75%
Sir
81%•
76%
65%
20. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
21. Comparison to the custom benchmark is shown. A description of the custom benchmark cohort can be found in the About section of the report.
If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
20
206
Overall quality of natural environment in
Shakopee, 2025
Natural Environment
The natural spaces in which residents live and
experience their communities has a direct and profound
effect on quality of life. The natural environment plays a
vital role in the health and well-being of residents.
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
6%
21%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole.
(`)/0 excellent or good)
Overall quality of natural environment
2021 2023 2025
76%' • • 73%
76%
31%
43%
vs. national vs. custom
benchmark22 benchmark23
Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community.
(% excellent or good)
Cleanliness
Water resources
Air quality
2021 2023 2025
73/0 ° Similar
73/0 0 84%o
66%.•• 64% Similar Similar
55%
85% 74% Similar Similar
72%
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee.
(% excellent or good)
Preservation of natural areas
Shakopee open space
Recycling
Yard waste pick-up
2021 2023 2025
63% 68%
54%
64% 70%
52%
71%' • •70%
67%
66%. • • 71%
65%
Similar
22. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
23. Comparison to the custom benchmark is shown. A description of the custom benchmark cohort can be found in the About section of the repor..
21
207
Overall quality of parks and recreation
opportunities, 2025
Parks and Recreation
"There are no communities that pride themselves on
their quality of life, promote themselves as a
desirable location for businesses to relocate, or
maintain that they are environmental stewards of
their natural resources, without such communities
having a robust, active system of parks and
recreation programs for public use and enjoyment."
- National Recreation and Park Association
Excellent 29%
Good
Fair
Poor
mh. 12%
16%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole.
(% excellent or good)
2021 2023 2025
54%
vs. national vs. custom
benchmark24 benchmark25
Overall quality ofparks and recreation 78%� • � 83%
80%
opportunities
Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community.
(% excellent or good)
2021 2023 2025
86% 77`)/0 74% irrNlar ��rilar
Availability of paths and walking trails
�
73%.0 •
77% Similar Similar
Fitness opportunities 69%
74%. o •70% Similar Similar
Recreational opportunities 73%
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee.
(% excellent or good)
2021 2023 2025
82%' • •77%Similar
City parks 74%
,
75o 0 • •67% Similar Similar
Recreation programs or classes 70%
76% X79% Similar Similar
Recreation centers or facilities 74%
24. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
25. Comparison to the custom benchmark is shown. A description of the custom benchmark cohort can be found in the About section of the repor..
22
208
Overall health and wellness opportunities in
Shakopee, 2025
Health and Wellness
The features and amenities of a community
directly influence residents' health and
well-being, shaping their overall quality of life.
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
8%
20%
14%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole.
(% excellent or good)
Overall health and wellness opport..
2021
79%'
2023 2025
69% e 78%
58%
vs. national vs. custom
benchmark26 benchmark'
Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community.
(% excellent or good)
2021 2023 2025
76% 68%
Similar
Availability of affordable quality food 61%
77%' • • 72% Higher Similar
Availability of affordable quality health 69%
care
82% 74% Higher Similar
Availability of preventive health 72%
services
Availability of affordable quality
mental health care
60%
54%
51%
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee.
(% excellent or good)
Health services
2021 2023 2025
83%' • • 77%
75%
Please rate your overall health.
(% excellent or very good)
Please rate your overall health.
2021 2023 2025
76% . • • 76%
71%
26. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 23
27. Comparison to the custom benchmark is shown. A description of the custom benchmark cohort can be found in the About section of the report. If no
comparison is available, this is left blank.
Overall opportunities for education,
culture and the arts, 2025
Education, Arts, and Culture
Participation in the arts, in educational opportunities, and
in cultural activities is linked to increased civic
engagement, greater social tolerance, and enhanced
enjoyment of the local community.
ExcellentIL
16%
Good il 47%
Fair 29%
PoorII
8%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole.
(% excellent or good) vs. national vs. custom
benchmark26 benchmark'
Overall opportunities for education,
2021
52%
2023 2025
64%
54%
culture, and the arts 11
Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community.
(% excellent or good)
2021
Opportunities to attend 45%
cultural/arts/music activities
Community support for the arts 47%
Availability of affordable quality 59%
childcare/preschool
58%
K-12 education
2023 2025
62%
57%
57%
49% 11
52% 39%
73% 68%
61%. 65%
• •61%
Adult educational opportunities
76%
Opportunities to attend special 56%
events and festivals
69%
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee.
(% excellent or good)
Public library services
2021 2023 2025
84%. • • 89%
83%
28. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 24 210
29. Comparison to the custom benchmark is shown. A description of the custom benchmark cohort can be found in the About section of the report.
If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
Residents' connection and engagement with
their community, 2025
Inclusivity and Engagement
Inclusivity refers to a cultural and environmental
feeling of belonging; residents who feel invited to
participate within their communities feel more
included, involved, and engaged.
Excellent
Good
1
10%
Fair 32%
Poor
9%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole.
(% excellent or good)
Residents' connection and engagement
with their community
2021
51%
2023 2025
59%
49%
48%
vs. national vs. custom
benchmark30 benchmark31
Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee.
(% excellent or good)
Shakopee as a place to raise
children
2021 2023 2025
80%. • •83% Similar Similar
78%
Shakopee as a place to retire
52%
58%
Sense of community
57%. • _
54%
63%
62%
Similar Similar
Similar Similar
Please rate the job you feel the Shakopee community does at each of the following.
(% excellent or good)
Making all residents feel welcome
2021
68%
2023
65%
75%
Attracting people from diverse
backgrounds
71%
2025
—'77%
4.71
80%
471
Similar
Higher Higher
25
211
Valuing/respecting residents from
diverse backgrounds
72%. • • 74%
67%
66% •61%
Taking care of vulnerable residents 57%
Similar
Similar
Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community.
(% excellent or good)
Sense of civic/community pride
Neighborliness of residents
Opportunities to participate in social
events and activities
2021 2023 2025
56%
50%
49%
61%' • •61%
58%
Similar Similar
Similar Similar
56%
63%
64%
Similar
62%. _
Opportunities to volunteer
68%
• •63%
Similar
Opportunities to participate in
community matters
58%• _
62%
• •58%
Similar Similar
Openness and acceptance of the
community toward people of diverse
backgrounds
62%. _
• _
64%
•62% Similar
Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months.
r/0 yes)
2021 2023 2025
Campaigned or advocated for a local
issue, cause, or candidate
13%' 14°/0e.
8%
30. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
31. Comparison to the custom benchmark is shown. A description of the custom benchmark cohort can be found in the About section of the report.
If no comparison is available, this is left blank.
26
212
Custom Questions
Below are the complete set of responses to each custom question on the survey. By default, "don't
know" responses are excluded.
Include "don't know"
Yes
Please indicate to The City should Strongly support
what degree you maintain current
would support or response times and Somewhat support
oppose each of the costs
following Somewhat oppose
approaches to the
rising costs related
to public safety
(police and fire).
The City should
accept longer
response times at
lower costs
Strongly oppose
Don't know
Strongly support
Somewhat support
Somewhat oppose
Strongly oppose
Don't know
The City should Strongly support
strive to shorten
response times, Somewhat support
even if that requires
Somewhat oppose
Strongly oppose
Don't know
Strongly support
Somewhat support
Somewhat oppose
Strongly oppose
Strongly support
Somewhat support
Somewhat oppose
Strongly oppose
an increase to
property taxes
How much you
would support or
oppose each of the
following property
tax increases that
would allow for
ncreased roadway
improvements
and/or
improvements to
public safety
facilities, vehicles,
and equipment?
$24 annual/$2
monthly increase
per $100,000 in
property/home
value
$48 annual/$4
monthly increase
per $100,000 in
property/home
value
•
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
I
I
$72 annual/$6 monthly Strongly support
increase per $100,000
in property/home value
Somewhat support
I
7
65%
23%
2%
3%
7%
11%
12%
20%
50%
5%
17%
34%
26%
15%
7%
39%
37%
11%
13%
24%
33%
20%
23%
8%
25% 27
213
$96 annual/$8
monthly increase
per $100,000 in
property/home
value
Please indicate City website
how much of a
source, if at all, you
consider each of
the following to be
for obtaining&
nbsp;information
about the City
government and its Local media outlets
activities, events (e.g., newspapers,
and services television)
Government
access channel
Shakopee
Snapshot
City Council or
other public
meetings
Somewhat oppose
Strongly oppose
Strongly support
Somewhat support
Somewhat oppose
Strongly oppose
Major source
Minor source
Wish it was a source
Not a source
Major source
Minor source
Wish it was a source
Not a source
Major source
Minor source
Wish it was a source
Not a source
Major source
Minor source
Wish it was a source
Not a source
Major source
Minor source
Wish it was a source
Not a source
1
•
■
■
■
■
■
i
■
■
■
i
Talking directly with Major source
City officials and/or
staff Minor source
•
25%
42%
10%
17%
13%
60%
58%
32%
2%
7%
19%
51%
12%
19%
11%
29%
6%
55%
18%
38%
6%
39%
28%
38%
6%
28%
18%
36%
28
214
Wish it was a source
Not a source
I
City social media Major source
(Facebook,
Instagram, Minor source
Linkedln)
Wish it was a source
Not a source
I
•
City videos Major source
(YouTube or other
city outlets) Minor source
Wish it was a source
Not a source
Word of mouth Major source
Minor source
Wish it was a source
Not a source
I
Utility bill stuffers or Major source
other direct mailers
Minor source
Wish it was a source
Not a source
I
10%
36%
44%
34%
5%
17%
21%
41%
5%
33%
26%
35%
10%
29%
27%
43%
4%
26%
29
215
The City of Shakopee 2025 Community Survey
Please complete this survey if you are an adult (age 18 or older). Your responses are confidential and no identifying
information will be shared.
1. Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee.
Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know
Shakopee as a place to live 1 2 3 4 5
Your neighborhood as a place to live 1 2 3 4 5
Shakopee as a place to raise children 1 2 3 4 5
Shakopee as a place to work 1 2 3 4 5
Shakopee as a place to visit 1 2 3 4 5
Shakopee as a place to retire 1 2 3 4 5
The overall quality of life in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
Sense of community 1 2 3 4 5
2. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole.
Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know
Overall economic health of Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus)
in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
Overall design or layout of Shakopee's residential and commercial
areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5
Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Shakopee
(water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) 1 2 3 4 5
Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
Overall quality of natural environment in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities 1 2 3 4 5
Overall health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts 1 2 3 4 5
Residents' connection and engagement with their community 1 2 3 4 5
3. Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following.
Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don't
likely likely unlikely unlikely know
Recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks 1 2 3 4 5
Remain in Shakopee for the next five years 1 2 3 4 5
4. Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel:
Very Somewhat Neither safe Somewhat Very Don't
safe safe nor unsafe unsafe unsafe know
In your neighborhood during the day 1 2 3 4 5 6
In Shakopee's downtown/commercial area
during the day 1 2 3 4 5 6
From property crime 1 2 3 4 5 6
From violent crime 1 2 3 4 5 6
From fire, flood, or other natural disaster 1 2 3 4 5 6
5. Please rate the job you feel the Shakopee community does at each of the following.
Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know
Making all residents feel welcome 1 2 3 4 5
Attracting people from diverse backgrounds 1 2 3 4 5
Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds 1 2 3 4 5
Taking care of vulnerable residents (elderly, disabled, homeless, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5
6. Please rate each of the following in the Shakopee community.
Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know
Overall quality of business and service establishments in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
Variety of business and service establishments in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area 1 2 3 4 5
Employment opportunities 1 2 3 4 5
Shopping opportunities 1 2 3 4 5
Cost of living in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
Overall image or reputation of Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
30
Page 1 of 5
216
THE NCSM
The National Community Survey''
7. Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community.
Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know
Traffic flow on major streets 1 2 3 4 5
Ease of public parking 1 2 3 4 5
Ease of travel by car in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
Ease of travel by public transportation in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
Ease of travel by bicycle in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
Ease of walking in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
Well -planned residential growth 1 2 3 4 5
Well -planned commercial growth 1 2 3 4 5
Well -designed neighborhoods 1 2 3 4 5
Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community 1 2 3 4 5
Public places where people want to spend time 1 2 3 4 5
Variety of housing options 1 2 3 4 5
Availability of affordable quality housing 1 2 3 4 5
Overall quality of new development in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
Overall appearance of Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
Cleanliness of Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
Water resources (beaches, lakes, ponds, riverways, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5
Air quality 1 2 3 4 5
Availability of paths and walking trails 1 2 3 4 5
Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.)1 2 3 4 5
Recreational opportunities 1 2 3 4 5
Availability of affordable quality food 1 2 3 4 5
Availability of affordable quality health care 1 2 3 4 5
Availability of preventive health services 1 2 3 4 5
Availability of affordable quality mental health care 1 2 3 4 5
Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities 1 2 3 4 5
Community support for the arts 1 2 3 4 5
Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool 1 2 3 4 5
K-12 education 1 2 3 4 5
Adult educational opportunities 1 2 3 4 5
Sense of civic/community pride 1 2 3 4 5
Neighborliness of residents in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
Opportunities to participate in social events and activities 1 2 3 4 5
Opportunities to attend special events and festivals 1 2 3 4 5
Opportunities to volunteer 1 2 3 4 5
Opportunities to participate in community matters 1 2 3 4 5
Openness and acceptance of the community toward people
of diverse backgrounds 1 2 3 4 5
8. Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months.
No Yes
Contacted the City of Shakopee (in -person, phone, email, or web) for help or information 1 2
Contacted Shakopee elected officials (in -person, phone, email, or web) to express your opinion 1 2
Attended a local public meeting (of local elected officials like City Council or County
Commissioners, advisory boards, town halls, HOA, neighborhood watch, etc.) 1 2
Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting 1 2
Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Shakopee 1 2
Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate 1 2
Voted in your most recent local election 1 2
Used bus, rail, subway, or other public transportation instead of driving 1 2
Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone 1 2
Walked or biked instead of driving 1 2
31
Page 2of!217
The City of Shakopee 2025 Community Survey
9. Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee.
Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know
Public information services 1 2 3 4 5
Economic development 1 2 3 4 5
Traffic enforcement 1 2 3 4 5
Traffic signal timing 1 2 3 4 5
Street repair 1 2 3 4 5
Street cleaning 1 2 3 4 5
Street lighting 1 2 3 4 5
Snow removal 1 2 3 4 5
Sidewalk maintenance 1 2 3 4 5
Bus or transit services 1 2 3 4 5
Land use, planning, and zoning 1 2 3 4 5
Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5
Affordable high-speed internet access 1 2 3 4 5
Garbage collection 1 2 3 4 5
Drinking water 1 2 3 4 5
Sewer services 1 2 3 4 5
Storm water management (storm drainage, dams, levees, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5
Power (electric and/or gas) utility 1 2 3 4 5
Utility billing 1 2 3 4 5
Police/Sheriff services 1 2 3 4 5
Crime prevention 1 2 3 4 5
Animal control 1 2 3 4 5
Ambulance or emergency medical services 1 2 3 4 5
Fire services 1 2 3 4 5
Fire prevention and education 1 2 3 4 5
Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community
for natural disasters or other emergency situations) 1 2 3 4 5
Preservation of natural areas (open space, farmlands, and greenbelts) 1 2 3 4 5
Shakopee open space 1 2 3 4 5
Recycling 1 2 3 4 5
Yard waste pick-up 1 2 3 4 5
City parks 1 2 3 4 5
Recreation programs or classes 1 2 3 4 5
Recreation centers or facilities 1 2 3 4 5
Health services 1 2 3 4 5
Public library services 1 2 3 4 5
Overall customer service by Shakopee employees
(police, receptionists, planners, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5
10. Please rate the following categories of Shakopee government performance.
Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know
The value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
The overall direction that Shakopee is taking 1 2 3 4 5
The job Shakopee government does at welcoming resident involvement 1 2 3 4 5
Overall confidence in Shakopee government 1 2 3 4 5
Generally acting in the best interest of the community 1 2 3 4 5
Being honest 1 2 3 4 5
Being open and transparent to the public 1 2 3 4 5
Informing residents about issues facing the community 1 2 3 4 5
Treating all residents fairly 1 2 3 4 5
Treating residents with respect 1 2 3 4 5
11. Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following?
Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know
The City of Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5
The Federal Government 1 2 3 4 5
32
Page 3 of 5
218
THE NCSM
The National Community Survey''
12. Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Shakopee community to focus on each of the
following in the coming two years.
Very Somewhat Not at all
Essential important important important
Overall economic health of Shakopee 1 2 3 4
Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus)
in Shakopee 1 2 3 4
Overall design or layout of Shakopee's residential and commercial
areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) 1 2 3 4
Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Shakopee
(water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) 1 2 3 4
Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee 1 2 3 4
Overall quality of natural environment in Shakopee 1 2 3 4
Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities 1 2 3 4
Overall health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee 1 2 3 4
Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts 1 2 3 4
Residents' connection and engagement with their community 1 2 3 4
13. Please indicate to what degree you would support or oppose each of the following approaches to the rising
costs related to public safety (police and fire).
Strongly Somewhat Somewhat Strongly Don't
support support oppose oppose know
The City should maintain current response times and costs 1 2 3 4 5
The City should accept longer response times at lower costs 1 2 3 4 5
The City should strive to shorten response times, even if
that requires an increase to property taxes 1 2 3 4 5
14. How much you would support or oppose each of the following property tax increases that would allow for
increased roadway improvements and/or improvements to public safety facilities, vehicles, and equipment?
Strongly Somewhat Somewhat Strongly
support support oppose oppose
$24 annual/$2 monthly increase per $100,000
in property/home value 1 2 3 4
$48 annual/$4 monthly increase per $100,000
in property/home value 1 2 3 4 -41.
$72 annual/$6 monthly increase per $100,000
in property/home value 1 2 3 4
$96 annual/$8 monthly increase per $100,000
in property/home value 1 2 3 4M-711.
15. Please indicate how much of a source, if at all, you consider each of the following to be for obtaining
information about the City government and its activities, events and services
Major Minor Wish it was Not a
source source a source source
City website 1 2 3 4
Local media outlets(e.g., newspapers, television) 1 2 3 4 El
Government access channel 1 2 3 4
Shakopee Snapshot 1 2 3 41
City Council or other public meetings 1 2 3 4
Talking directly with City officials and/or staff 1 2 3 41
City social media (Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn) 1 2 3 4
City videos (YouTube or other city outlets) 1 2 3 4
Word of mouth 1 2 3 4
Utility bill stuffers or other direct mailers 1 2 3 j 4
33
Page 4of! 219
The City of Shakopee 2025 Community Survey
Our last questions are about you and your household.
Again, all of your responses to this survey are confidential and no identifying information will be shared.
Dl. In general, how many times do you:
Several Once A few times Every Less often Don't
times a day a day a week few weeks or never know
Access the internet from your home using
a computer, laptop, or tablet computer 1 2 3 4 5 6
Access the internet from your cell phone 1 2 3 4 5 6
Visit social media sites such as Facebook,
X (formerly Twitter), Nextdoor, etc.
Use or check email
Share your opinions online
Shop online
D2. Please rate your overall health.
O Excellent 0 Very good 0 Good
D3. What impact, if any, do you think the economy
Do you think the impact will be:
O Very positive 0 Somewhat positive
D4. How many years have you lived in
Shakopee?
O Less than 2 years
O 2-5 years
O 6-10 years
O 11-20 years
O More than 20 years
D5. Which best describes the building you live
in?
O Single-family detached home
O Townhouse or duplex (may share walls but
no units above or below you)
O Condominium or apartment (have units
above or below you)
O Mobile home
O Other
D6. Do you rent or own your home?
O Rent
O Own
D7. About how much is your monthly housing
cost for the place you live (including rent,
mortgage payment, property tax, property
insurance, and homeowners' association
(HOA) fees)?
O Less than $300 0 $2,500 to $3,999
O $300 to $599 0 $4,000 to $6,999
O $600 to $999 0 $7,000 to $9,999
O $1,000 to $1,499 0 $10,000 or more
O $1,500 to $2,499
D8. Do any children 17 or under live in your
household?
O No 0 Yes
D9. Are you or any other members of your
household aged 65 or older?
O No 0 Yes
Thank you!
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
O Fair 0 Poor
will have on your family income in the next 6 months?
0 Neutral
0 Somewhat negative 0 Very negative
D10. How much do you anticipate your household's total
income before taxes will be for the current year?
(Please include in your total income money from all
sources for all persons living in your household.)
O Less than $25,000 0 $100,000 to $149,999
O $25,000 to $49,999 0 $150,000 to $199,999
O $50,000 to $74,999 0 $200,000 to $299,999
O $75,000 to $99,999 0 $300,000 or more
D11. Are you of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin?
O No 0Yes
D12. What is your race? (Mark one or more races to
indicate what race you consider yourself to be.)
❑ American Indian or Alaskan Native
❑ Asian
❑ Black or African American
❑ Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
❑ White
❑ A race not listed
D13. In which category is your age?
O 18-24 years
O 25-34 years
O 35-44 years
O 45-54 years
D14. What is your gender?
O Woman
O Man
O Identify in another way 4 go to D14a
D14a. If you identify in another way, how would you
describe your gender?
0 Agender/I don't identify with any gender
O Genderqueer/gender fluid
O Non -binary
O Transgender man
O Transgender woman
O Two -spirit
O Identify in another way
Please return the completed survey in the postage -paid envelope to:
National Research Center, Inc., PO Box 14050, Houston, TX 77221-9904
O 55-64 years
O 65-74 years
O 75 years or older
Page 5 of 5
34
220
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 12.a
March 3, 2026
City Bill List
Becky Smith, Accounting Specialist
Action to be considered:
Review of City Bill List
Motion Type:
Informational only
Background:
The City Bill has been provided to the City Council.
Recommendation:
Review of City Bill List
Budget Impact:
N/A
Attachments:
221
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 12.b
March 3, 2026
News and Announcements
Rick Parsons
Action to be considered:
No action, item is informational only.
Motion Type:
Informational only
Background:
Announcements and Upcoming Events:
• Tree Removal
O Tree Removal in Huber Park and along the Minnesota River will begin in the
next 1-2 weeks. This is the first step in construction of the Minnesota
Riverbank Stabilization Project. The Majority of the trees along the south
riverbank extending from the Holmes Street bridge to Market Street will be cut
down and removed. The tree removal is necessary to be completed prior to
the end of March for the protection of endangered species that may be
nesting in the trees. The larger construction project will not begin until later
this fall. Please contact the Engineering Department with any questions about
the project.
• Egg Hunt and Candy Grab
O Join the Parks and Recreation Department for the annual Egg Hunt and Candy
Grab from 1:00 - 2:30 pm Saturday, March 21, 2026, at Tahpah Park. This event
is free and will happen rain, snow, or shine, so please make sure to dress for
the weather. Bring a bag or basket for your goodies!
Recommendation:
Please review the information on upcoming news and announcements.
Budget Impact:
N/A.
Attachments:
222