Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
May 09, 2024 Planning Packet
<OP LP Shakopee Planning Commission Meeting May 9, 2024 7:00 PM City Hall, 485 Gorman St. Presiding Chair Josh Forsythe 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Call for Notarized Affidavits, Proof of Neighborhood Meeting and Sign in Sheet for appropriate Public Hearing 4. Recognition by Planning Commission of Interested Citizens 5. Consent Business - (All items listed in this section are anticipated to be routine. After a discussion by the Chair there will be an opportunity for members of the Commission to remove any items from the consent agenda for individual discussion. Those items removed will be considered following the Public hearing portion of the agenda. Items remaining on the Consent Agenda will not be discussed and will be approved in one motion.) 5.A. Meeting Minutes of April 4, 2024 5.B. Vacation of Certain Drainage and Utility Easements at 1465 Maras Street 6. General Business 6.A. PUBLIC HEARING - Preliminary and Final Plat of CDA SHAKOPEE ADDITION, Planned Unit Development (PUD) District #13 (Scott County CDA Office and Senior Housing), and Comprehensive Plan Amendment 6.B. PUBLIC HEARING - Preliminary and Final Plat of Maras Street First Addition 7. Other Business 8. Adjourn to Thursday, June 6, 2024 at 7:00 p.m. If a commissioner has any comments, concerns or questions, he or she should contract the staff project manager prior to the scheduled meeting date. Also, if a commissioner is unable to attend the meeting for any reason, please call the Department of Planning and Development at 952-233-9300 as soon as possible. Thank you! Page 1 of 98 5.A. Shakopee Planning Commission Meeting May 9, 2024 FROM: Lori J. Hensen, City Clerk TO: President and Commission Members Subject: Planning meeting minutes of April 4, 2024. Policy/Action Requested: Approve the meeting minutes of April 4, 2024. Recommendation: Approve the meeting minutes of April 4, 2024. Discussion: ATTACHMENTS: o April 4, 2024 Page 2 of 98 Shakopee Planning Commission March 4, 2024 7:00 PM City Hall, 485 Gorman St. 1. Meeting began at 7:31PM Roll Call: Present Commissioners: Reding, Sandhu(Chair), Ranua, Sepulveda, Staff Kerski 2. Approval agenda: Ranua motion, Sepulveda seconded. Unanimous. 3. Call — good 4. Interested citizens — None 5. Consent business — a. Meeting Minutes of March 7, 2024 b. Drainage and utility easement Motion by Sepulveda and seconded by Reding. Approved unanimously. 6. General Business: None 7. Other Business: None 8. Motion to adjourn to May 9, 2024 by Reding moved and seconded by Sepulvado. Unanimously approved. Adjourned at 7:34 PM. Page 3 of 98 5.B. Shakopee Planning Commission Meeting May 9, 2024 FROM: Kyle Sobota, Senior Planner TO: Planning Commission Subject: Vacation of Certain Drainage and Utility Easements at 1465 Maras Street Policy/Action Requested: Recommend City Council adopt Resolution R2024-073, which vacates certain drainage and utility easements located on the properties at 1465 Maras Street. Recommendation: Recommend that the City Council adopt the resolution, as presented. Discussion: Site Information: Applicant: John Mesenbrink, Mesenbrink Construction Property Address: 1465 Maras Street Property Owner: Maras Street LLC Lot Area: 22.86 Acres (two parcels, 5.38 acres & 17.48 acres) Zoning: I-1, Light Industry 2040 Comp. Plan: Mixed Use Employment Center John Mesenbrink, representing Maras Street LLC, property owner, has applied for a vacation of certain public drainage and utility easements on the two parcels located at 1465 Maras Street. The applicant has proposed to vacate certain easements on the site and combine the two parcels with a preliminary and fmal plat that will be reviewed by the Planning Commission at this meeting. As part of the preliminary / fmal plat process the applicant is proposing to dedicate the necessary easements for both the existing and future development of a 12,000 square -foot Page 4 of 98 building and paved storage area. The proposed plans work to fix the existing drainage issues in this area and meet current stormwater requirements. Shakopee Public Utilities has commented that although this vacation does not impact water or electric services, an additional easement dedicated to Shakopee Public Utilities will be necessary for electric service for the new building. ATTACHMENTS: o Location Map o Vacation Exhibit 1 o Vacation Exhibit 2 • Tract R Vacation Legal Description o East 6/7 Vacation Legal Description • Engineering Department Comments • Resolution R2024-073 Page 5 of 98 PIIOIW'I IV Not 1V � IIIIIII C?jliii Ir IIIIII�IIIIIIII� �,� H �I.I.���mlll!!!!!!!!IIIIWIIII pWIIIIIiwWlilllljllll� iIIII��N'Iw "�i�Pi'H��� Mww' VI I' Hn'Mlilll ll m,ll � liii' "� ,rl III wY' WUVNVVIVVVIWIIIII p plll IllllllNtltlN "II GN' uumlmpul I mm,IV', W u o ulll�l�l uuuuuuouYp""Y'y'161 I I u ' Imlm�lullll h g0000ulmW""" 101110',„1111,,Ilo �1�I ��r.lol i 6up m Inl�'Ir� 111l I'll I II uuluu'Iu11 lu, IIIIIIIIIIIIII u ology1111111 NII Vill1,I001111MNII °Mlllu000um IN IIIWI,����I �m11111111'lill'i°1' 11 91V"V�PII���'IuuNw�ul�Hi"'I'll'„"II'� �Iltil IIII �II °��Vpl�1'IIN�°i;lilll�lll "V�"�urNw „ollmudWl II I llo l � III�� I ' 11111llllllllllllllllullllllllla 'lllllllllll' II, 0IIIIlil1 00000004 IIII .....� iiuuu I II4I IIII '111111 I11NI1111 �ml uum ;�IldiM olVl' uW1WWW11JMW' mnoulilpp d11,1iilWlla, ml11110000 0 I ulll I X111111 lllllld llh y u IIIIIIIIIIIIgIIlllmlll iollIu@IoII ��'Nuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu r i'IY'Ii Nluolllood unnu4111111 II m�V�N�tlM",I Easement Vacation Ske tcf Li) N) CO cvl C', E line of the SE 1/4 of Sec 12 -• O O o Cn O I) O 69. 9 00•Z17c 1SV3 NW corner of Tract R W line of Tract R POINT OF BEGINNING EASEMENT VACATION DESCRIPTIONS 0 a u w C O O v u a) U V C m 0_0., U yC..n N ,' y ,.0 n "6 a) M "6 v _0.'1) i.' C, c0 O CO 0 LI) O Z Cr 01 n3 C1 N u M U W N tO C w Cr- -I U O U C U u ..., Nco CO 6 N co C. N ,.., @ ,L., U N w N •`� O U .L, fie, LI7 C w t13 w W V N N th o LoL M f• l NON N O w U CO 0 U L 0 `i C i U 0 O t0 03 U U U "' 0 C C U) U U, O (6 C 6 n3 _ ON a3 o M C U7 N -0..w... U �, O1 L Y U N co C N 9 W 9' N W'O co N N 6 N co to cr.) E C N -0 N O 3 o N C 4- Z N U a) 00 u m v U U o o) N c o U 0 U3 d- "0 0 ,., u, N N U) CO a0, N rci W o y U 0_ N C a., C i co �) 00 cn E o LA �� a) Cr, o o C urn UO O U N aS U L U N U N CT +, N U o a) �� a) a) ,L., N o a) "o ? 0 0 p N C • _0 +-' O- O 01 J p U C _a) C O f�l N .C Ego 0�0 - oD Uno u� r' D o a) N L m u) c u a) w N a) + U Q) 0 �a o c o E. a u o v rn n o 0 a� a) o U N t N , N O v 0 -Q o owm m U N _a N cu �1 "O U U U O O1,400M. N :),,,,,°UON:CCU UCt m ,@., C o N a) U o a) a)-0 +a), C U N L C O ,..i U C LL ~ q, C N a_.1., ., U3 0, mL E > u N +, in u") 0 cu, O o C 0. -- N 1 UO N o c L a U L C 0 6 o C U N o =' nz ,.0)a N-0 N U) v o N o 0 =o a)�o o 3 0 ,L.+ O �, C C a N L 7 0 0 p C O E N n3 C 0 N W to M 0 -0 a) Q u __,E U a) La f, -, LI) C N _ca) a) - .--I o L U ,, C V @ O 0 .,-- CO - 0, , a) 7 N C v N "UO O 0. C w w O (1,) O T a) O o. ENO y O U U) N E M N 7 N C1 CD -C O 0 0 ( 0 N a) H t U m rn cn .--I -o cn.y EASEMENT VA -o a O ,o C° O C o 5 y o ° y r 7 0 @- r v) c C °• rn >` a) a.-, +.� a) _ W — 0 (n d- C 1a C i 17,, '~ N a) a) U cp > 01 J CU N a) i i y., In O C O y a) 3 u) a +_, CT N L aL..� a) �' Q) N C C E a..i -O ° i To -O a) 3 rC in 7° N w in CO aE) a 0 U.0 in n3 _c al O a u 0,— a) c6 a a) .. a• O °) C 16 to L w �1 9 vl (j)"C N •N 4—'aJ .C ≤ W a) Q) 7 L Ip IU = C N N 7 3 O c y E X 1 MI C aJ a) a) a) E ,t1 O )n O N 00 o = � .-2 CO ,� a; .-I C L U U -O In - 2 tn vMI C 0 3 0� 00'Lo'' a) CO a) a� i o O O m v 0 X N� o W G. U C y a) C a) a) a a) = u L 'L L 'n a) L a) lD 0 c fn a, 7 m 7 N 01 i L 01 L .- )p L o a) o (a a) O H< HZ a)yln'°mu) 'OZ a) 7 y 7 N? O (1) CT O N O V)J(° W i 0 i —4— (LO U O 'to, O N 7 N J O O N - a N O = Q O w N O a N C. to tun O_ O C O y -O a) a3 - _CI w p= N J C J O a) 7 O O U a) ns v v �) r :4 U 2 = 7, a) in L in y C) w L C •• CO al a C T W L W 7 .- V a -' O OL O7 vQ)cemca°)i 17" CLW Loy +_, 7 w _ w uo!TIPPV seaeN 'T )II9 'b Tod do JOJ 3S T a 7o m o ra > a) r (11 d- W L v) + N O a) Q L -O (n N C .1-• J y, c , N '_ w O C L O O O U 10 "W i w EnJ C•O f6 a) a7 -0 6) 1 2 i = V ,TE .C a) in U `^ a) C +L' ro N H . W WE49 7 CT In 0 C a) a) .C a1 a) L a) y K Iv m wE .4_ °' ° c5i 7 W m ° O O .--i a) -0 c -6 N ul a1 _C O .5 C C a) t c L O 0. a) N a) ,_(1, V1 L L CTa a. v 0 C 3 z a X C X O L U ,- V) Fa) y ° in C in 'o) U) p en O N WmW O) + E a) m O C as UU) m ca 3 a.+ C _0 n N y., O O 0 'L WW.-: W no., a) @ �O m C co CO Lt) = N = "O N N W Nf° a)17 ,00 a Q) O L U U —i ,L 0 (1) C C L L U -6 )6 N U- L -I-'-� faiT, O 7 .In N O 0-0 )00'"6 a 1 r0 0 ° m ra v o y • a C o o ° — a) = U L O. a) c to a) 7 .1-, -I-. U a) 1 L L < I— Z a) ..+ V) U.! J U.! +L., 5'L 9Z 17/T MS at -IT JO Z/T 3 0141 Jo L/9 3 aqJ Jo Z/T M auT Jo au!I 3 a4T Pue Peal '17Z 'ON S1'd Jo auJI M Area to be vacated Area of easement for utility and drainage pruposes to be vacated = 13,107 squa }aa4 oz l = you! l :aioa! 0330 60'617 'SV3IN 6Z Z /vi W LI I _-_ -', -,I I I I Ill y .J 1- , 4,-) LI O -J ...11 I{ -J \!/ W -, 11 t 1 �i "' Co/ CN 1 7 L98S96 'ON JuawnDoa gad sasodand kTIIiTf pue a6euleaa JOJ Tuewase3 /-7T/—/7 �/z7 TTY/7TT—/� 7-/-/-7 7- 7-/7/ -7 TTY 7 Tr —i7 7-7-7 T/T1.-y 13381S 3 8 1 S S V' l v W -, -,111;; I, \J 1 5'L 9L 'SV3.3W 08'6x17 0330 00'61617 EASEMENT VACATION DESCRIPTIONS The perpetual drainage, utility and ponding Easement as described in, and as acquired by the City of Shakopee, Doc. Nos. 87277, 389598, 88713, 394592, 88714, 394593, 92440, 407069, 92441 and 407070 as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Tract R; thence South 00 degrees 18 minutes 40 seconds East, on an assumed bearing, along the west line of said Tract R, a distance of 503.77 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continue South 00 degrees 18 minutes 40 seconds East, a distance of 445.97 feet; thence East, a distance of 342.00 feet; thence South 08 degrees 55 minutes 56 seconds East, a distance of 403.00 feet; thence South 43 degrees 27 minutes 10 seconds West, a distance of 79.00 feet, thence South 00 degrees 18 minutes 17 seconds West, a distance of 93.00 feet; thence South 62 degrees 39 minutes 50 seconds East, a distance of 106.00 feet; thence East, a distance of 127.09 feet to the east line of said Tract R; thence North 00 degrees 19 minutes 06 seconds West along the east line of said Tract R, a distance of 777.83 feet; thence North 65 degrees 00 minutes 32 seconds West, a distance of 627.89 feet to the point of beginning. AND The perpetual drainage and utility Easement in favor of the City of Shakopee, recorded as Document No. T278792, described as follows: A drainage and utility easement over, under and across the South 15 feet and also the East 15 feet of Tract R, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 24, Scott County, Minnesota, said East 15 feet lying south of the south line of the drainage, utility and ponding easement described in Document Numbers 87277, 389598, 88713, 394592, 88714, 394593, 92440, 407069, 92441 and 407070. Page 9 of 98 EASEMENT VACATION DESCRIPTION The perpetual, non-exclusive easement for utility and drainage purposes contained in Easement in favor of the City of Shakopee, recorded as Document No. A965867, which lies within the following described property: That part of the West Half of the East Six -sevenths of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 115 North, Range 22 West, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast Corner of Lot 4 Block I Maras Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, said point being on the east line of said West Half of the East Six -sevenths of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter, said line being also the west line of Registered Land Survey No. 24; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 18 minutes 40 seconds East along said east line of the West Half of the East Six -sevenths of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter said line being also the west line of Registered Land Survey No. 24 for a distance of 767.25 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing South 0 degrees 18 minutes 40 seconds East along said east line of the West Half of the East Six -sevenths of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter, said line being also the west line of Registered Land Survey No. 24 for a distance of 449.09 feet to the Southeast Corner of said West Half of the East Six -sevenths of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter, said corner being also the Southwest Corner of Registered Land Survey No. 24; thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 54 seconds West along the South line of said West Half of the East Six sevenths of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter 283.905 feet; thence North 0 degrees 18 minutes 26 seconds West 449.00 feet; thence east parallel with the south line of said Lot 4, 283.87 feet to the actual point of beginning. AND That part of the West Half of the East Six -sevenths of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 115 North, Range 22 West, Scott County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast Corner of Lot 4 Block I Maras Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof said point being on the east line of said West Half of the East Six -sevenths of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter, said line being also the west line of Registered Land Survey No. 24; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 18 minutes 40 seconds East along said east line of West Half of the East six - sevenths of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter, said line being also the west line of Registered Land Survey No. 24 for a distance of 767.25 feet; thence west parallel with the south line of said Lot 4 for a distance of 283.87 feet; thence North 0 degrees 18 minutes 26 seconds West 767.25 feet to said Page 10 of 98 south line of Lot 4; thence East along said south line of Lot 4 for a distance of 283.82 feet to the actual point of beginning. Except the North 191.85 feet (as measured perpendicular to the North line thereof, the same being the South line of Lot 4, Maras Addition, Scott County, Minnesota) thereof. Page 11 of 98 City of Shakopee Memorandum TO: Kyle Sobota, Senior Planner FROM: Darin Manning, Project Engineer SUBJECT: Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements PROJECT: VACA-OOO2OO-2O24 DATE: April 23, 2024 The staff review indicates a request to vacate an existing public drainage and utility easement. The reason for this request is to clean up outdated information as the two lots that encompass these easements are being combined into one lot for the Maras Street First Addition Plat. The Engineering Department has completed its review of the vacation request and offers the following comments at this time for the applicant and for the planning department: 1. Conduct a title search to confirm other interest from utility holders in any existing/underlying easements on the property. 2. Vacation of easements shall be contingent on new drainage and utility easements being dedicated and recorded with the County. Recommendation Should the City recommend approval of this request, the Engineering Department suggests the items listed above be attached as conditions of the approval. H:\Development\Maras Street 1st Addition\Project Management \Letters and Memos\Staff Review\Maras Street First Addition Easement Vacation 04 23 24.docx 1 oft Page 12 of 98 RESOLUTION R2024-073 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE VACATION OF A CERTAIN DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AT 1465 MARAS STREET WHEREAS, John Mesenbrink, applicant, and Maras Street LLC, property owner, has made application proposing to vacate a certain easement on the property located at 1465 Maras Street; and WHEREAS, it has been presented to the Shakopee City Council that the public drainage and utility easements as described in the attached exhibits on the property located at 1465 Maras Street, is no longer of public use or interest; and WHEREAS, the Shakopee Planning Commission considered the request at its meeting of May 9, 2024, and recommended approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, a public hearing to consider the action to vacate the alley was held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall in the City of Shakopee at 7:00 P.M. on the 21st day of May, 2024; and WHEREAS, the proposed vacation is described as: (See Attached Exhibits / Legal Descriptions); and WHEREAS, ten days published notice was provided by publication of the notice in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS and the City Website and posted notice was provided by posting such notice on the bulletin board in the Shakopee City Hall. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that it finds and determines that the vacation of the alley as identified above is in the public interest, provided the following conditions are met: 1. A title search shall be conducted to confirm other interest from utility holders in any existing/underlying easements on the property. 2. This vacation of easement is contingent on a new drainage and utility easements being dedicated and recorded at Scott County Land Records. Page 13 of 98 After the adoption of the Resolution, the City Clerk shall file certified copies hereof with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Scott County. Adopted in Regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the 21st day of May, 2024. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Lori Hensen, City Clerk Page 14 of 98 6.A. Shakopee Planning Commission Meeting May 9, 2024 FROM: Amanda Schwabe, Planner TO: Planning Commission Subject: PUBLIC HEARING - Preliminary and Final Plat of CDA SHAKOPEE ADDITION, Planned Unit Development (PUD) District #13 (Scott County CDA Office and Senior Housing), and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Policy/Action Requested: Three separate voting actions are required: 1. Recommend adoption of Resolution R2024-064, approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide property located between 5th Avenue E and 6th Avenue E and Holmes Street S and Lewis Street S from Institution to Downtown Transition in Figure 4.12 - Planned Land Use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2. Recommend adoption of Ordinance O2024-006, approving Planned Unit Development District #13 (Scott County CDA Office and Senior Housing) for property located between 5th and 6th Avenue E and Holmes Street S and Lewis Street S. 3. Recommend adoption of Resolution R2024-065, approving the Preliminary and Final Plat of CDA SHAKOPEE ADDITION. Recommendation: Approve the requested actions. Discussion: Site Information: Property Owner: Scott County Community Development Agency Lot Area: 2.06 Acres Current Zoning: Traditional Neighborhood District (R -1C) Proposed Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Current 2040 Comprehensive Plan Classification: Institution Page 15 of 98 Proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan Classification: Downtown Transition Project Overview: UrbanWorks Architecture in partnership with Ivy Properties, applicants, and Scott County Community Development Agency (CDA), property owner, have proposed: • Preliminary and Final Plat of CDA SHAKOPEE ADDITION. • Planned Unit Development (PUD) District #13 (Scott County CDA Office and Senior Housing). • Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide the property located between 5th Avenue E and 6th Avenue E and Holmes Street S and Lewis Street S from Institution to Downtown Transition in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.. The applicant is proposing a three-story, 60 unit senior housing building with an attached, approximate 17,000 sq. ft. one-story office building on the 2.06 -acre property known as the Central Family School site. The east and south portions of the building will be residential and the northerly section will be the new office for the Scott County CDA. Preliminary & Final Plat: The entire city block is proposed to be platted as CDA Shakopee Addition, which combines the existing ten city lots and the previously vacated alley into one parcel with the required drainage and utility easements. The primary residential entry will be on the south side facing 6th Avenue East with the primary office entrance facing northwesterly towards 5th Avenue East/Holmes Street South. Vehicular access to the residential underground parking and on -site, at -grade parking stalls will be from Holmes Street South. A total of 36 on -street parking stalls will be available as part of this project (19 new angled parking stalls along 5th Avenue E in addition to three new stalls and 14 existing stalls along 6th Avenue E) to accommodate office clients and guests at the property. Overnight parking on the street will not be allowed. The proposed landscaping is consistent with city code requirements. A total of 75 trees are required for this project, which the applicant is proposing to exceed. The trees are proposed to be installed around the perimeter of the building, in the interior courtyard area as well as to supplement the existing boulevard trees on this block. Park dedication fees have not been collected on this site previously and will be required prior to recording the Final Plat. Planned Unit Development: Page 16 of 98 As part of the PUD, the applicants are requesting a mix of multi -family senior residential (requires a CUP in R -1C) and office uses (not allowed in R -1C) as well as deviations from the following: • Building height: Residential component requesting approximately 40 feet which exceeds the 35 -foot maximum height in the R-1 C zoning district; and • Window Coverage: Office component exceeds the minimum window requirements at the main entrance (25% required, 27% proposed) and facades facing right of ways (5% required, 13% and 16% proposed). The Residential building window percentages are less than the required 30% for the R -1C district (proposed 29%, 20%, 22% and 11%); however, the window size has been maximized while keeping in consideration the location of elevators, stairwells and other features that are less conducive to large window installations. • On -site parking: The minimum on site parking required for the project is 99 stalls (60 residential and 39 office). The applicants are incorporating 98 stalls on -site (66 underground and 32 on -site at -grade) in addition to providing the additional on -street stalls as described above. • Setbacks: The minimum front yard setback in R-1 C is 30 feet when there are fewer than three other principle buildings on the block. The proposed office building will be 17 feet from the property line along 5th Avenue E, which is a larger setback than the previous school structure and a minimum of 15 feet from the property line abutting Holmes Street S. The proposed residential building will be a minimum of 16 feet from the property line along 6th Avenue E and 17 feet from the property line abutting Lewis Street S. The average front yard setback for the residences on 5th Avenue E and 6th Avenue E adjacent to the subject property is 15 feet. A stipulation of a PUD with dwellings requires the applicant to provide a minimum of 15 percent open space as landscaped areas available for the common use of and accessible by all residents or occupants of the buildings within the PUD. This open space requirement is met with the proposed open space areas including the courtyard area with seating adjacent to the building to the south of the on -site, at -grade parking as well as two outdoor patios areas in the northeast corner and along the south side of the residential building. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following (applicants response follows the statement): 1) Provide for the establishment of a PUD zoning district in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan. The current guidance for the property is Institution which allows for school, government and Page 17 of 98 recreation facilities as primary uses and open space and parking as secondary uses. The institution use ceased in 2020 when the school district vacated operations in the building. In 2023 the building was demolished and the site was cleared for redevelopment. The proposed PUD will incorporate a mix of affordable, senior residential housing and office uses which will be consistent with the comprehensive plan once the property is reguided to Downtown Transition. 2) Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the city, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability and general welfare of the city. The proposed development of one building with two, separate uses allows for an aesthetic design that complements the surrounding residential uses while focusing the one-story office use in the direction of the existing government center buildings to the northwest. 3) Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the city's standards to offset the effect of any variations. The design standard deviations associated with this request include residential building height, residential window percentages, and one, on -site parking stall in exchange for offering a variety of high quality building materials (brick, glass, fiber cement shingle and lap siding, and accent materials), landscaping which exceeds minimum requirements, and an underground infiltration tank to accommodate stormwater needs which were not addressed previously. 4) Ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. The proposed building scale and materials are compatible with the surrounding land uses (Scott County Government Center, one- and two story single-family residences, church, and three-story multi -family senior housing building). 5) Maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities. No new public streets or utilities are required for this project; however, the number of curb cuts on Lewis Street S will be reduced from two to one. 6) Preserve and enhance site characteristics, including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views and screening. Page 18 of 98 The existing, healthy boulevard trees will remain along Holmes Street S and Lewis Street S and will be complimented by additional landscaping on the site which exceeds the minimum requirements. 7) Allow for mixing of land uses within a development. The proposed project incorporates both multi -family residential and office uses in one building. 8) Encourage a variety of housing types, including affordable housing. The proposed multi -family residential building offers affordable independent living to residents 55+ years and includes a variety of unit styles ranging from studio, 1 bedroom, 1 bedroom plus, 2 bedroom, and 2 bedroom plus den. 9) Ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposed one-story office use with on -site, at -grade parking behind the office portion of the building was designed to fit in with the scale of the existing single-family homes across the street. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: 1) Where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one land use in the comprehensive plan, the city may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this chapter and the comprehensive plan; and 2) Any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted, if it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this chapter and the comprehensive plan and the design substantially exceeds any current standards; and 3) Permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned unit development designation and shall be in general confouirance with the comprehensive plan; and 4) The setback regulations, parking ratios, building height, lot and building coverage ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in division (A) of this section. The applicant has submitted plans that are generally consistent with these four standards, Page 19 of 98 unless deemed not applicable (i.e. #2 above as this is a mixed use development). Proposed densities will align with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan once the property is reguided to Downtown Transition as Institution does not allow for residential or office uses. Comprehensive Plan Amendment: The applicants are proposing to amend Figure 4.12 - Planned Land Use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan to reflect the removal of the Institution land use and reguide the 2.06 acre property to Downtown Transition. As stated previously, the Institution land use ceased in 2020 when the school district vacated the building followed by the demolishing of the building and clearing the site for redevelopment in 2023. The proposed redevelopment of the site for a 3 -story affordable senior housing complex and 1 -story office use (Scott County CDA) meets the requirements of the Downtown Transition classification requirements and is a reasonable transition from the large Institution classification to the northwest (Scott County Government Center) and Mixed Residential to the east. The close proximity to the Scott County Government Center and location along Minnesota Valley Transit Authority bus routes compliments these proposed uses. The following are the criteria evaluated in the granting of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The City Council may grant a Comprehensive Plan Amendment with a two thirds majority when it finds that one or more of the following criteria exists: 1) The comprehensive plan was in error: The comprehensive plan is not in error as the property was used for Institutional purposes up until 2020. It was understood by the city and property owner that a comprehensive plan amendment would be necessary as part of any redevelopment activity with a primary use that was not school, government, or recreation related. 2) Significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place. Significant changes in community goals and policies have not taken place. 3) Significant changes in development patterns have occurred. Significant changes in development patterns of this area occurred when the school district vacated the building in 2020, demolished the building, and sold the property in 2023. 4) The Comprehensive Plan does not require a different provision. Page 20 of 98 Redevelopment of the site for a non school, government or recreation use would require a difference provision. Staff finds that the amendment meets 2 of the 4 criteria necessary to be approved by the City Council. The applicants conducted a neighborhood meeting on April 24, 2024 with 19 people in attendance (not including project representatives). Discussion was had regarding parking, construction traffic/hours/timeframe, CDA office hours/staffing, removal of the school playground, and snow removal. City departments and other outside agencies were given the opportunity to review and provide comments regarding these applications. City Engineering, Shakopee Public Utilities (SPU), and Planning staff have provided memos/comments that have been redlined on the plan sets and incorporated into the draft Ordinance and Resolution as appropriate. Engineering is requiring drainage and utility easements be provided around the perimeter of the property as well as over the proposed underground infiltration tank beneath a portion of the at -grade parking. In addition to the redline comments on the civil plan set which will need to be addressed prior to the issuance of a building or sewer/water permit, SPU is requiring the owner to enter into the appropriate agreements for water and electric service, pay the Water Capacity Charge Fee, and establish a service account with SPU. ATTACHMENTS: o Draft Resolution R2024-064 e Draft Ordinance O2024-006 o Draft Resolution R2024-065 e Site Aerial • Applicant Narrative e Existing Conditions Survey e Preliminary Plat Drawing o Final Plat Drawing e Architectural Plans o Civil Plans o Landscape Plans o Guiding Map o Redlined Plans e Engineering Memo Page 21 of 98 RESOLUTION R2024-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO FIGURE 4.12 - PLANNED LAND USE IN THE 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, Paul Knutson, UrbanWorks Architecture in partnership with Steve Dunbar, Ivy Properties, applicants, and Scott County Community Development Agency, property owner, has made an application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Figure 4.12 — Planned Land Use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan from Institution to Downtown Transition (see Exhibit A); WHEREAS, the affected properties are legally described as Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, all in Block 74, CITY OF SHAKOPEE, Scott County, Minnesota, together with vacated alley accruing thereto by reason of vacation thereof, as set forth in Resolution R2023-070 adopted July 5, 2023, filed November 15, 2023, as Document No. A1181597; and WHEREAS, all required public notices regarding the public hearing for the Comprehensive Plan amendment were duly sent and posted, and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee did review the application on May 9, 2024, and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee did review the application on May 21, 2024, and adopted the following findings: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Shakopee hereby adopts the following findings of facts relative to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment request: Criteria #1 The original zoning ordinance is in error. Finding #1 The comprehensive plan is not in error as the property was used for Institutional purposes up until 2020. It was understood by the city and property owner that a comprehensive plan amendment would be necessary as part of any redevelopment activity with a primary use that was not school, government, or recreation related. Criteria #2 Significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place. Finding #2 Significant changes in community goals and policies have not taken place. Page 22 of 98 Criteria #3 Significant changes in development patterns have occurred. Finding #3 Significant changes in development patterns of this area occurred when the school district vacated the building in 2020, demolished the building, and sold the property in 2023. Criteria #4 The Comprehensive Plan requires a different provision. Finding #4 Redevelopment of the site for a non -school, government or recreation use would require a different provision. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, to incorporate the changes, the city will modify its official land use map; and FURTHER, approval of the comprehensive plan amendment is contingent upon, and subject to, the required review and response by the Metropolitan Council. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 21st day of May, 2024. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Lori Hensen, City Clerk Page 23 of 98 EXHIBIT A Proposed Guiding: Downtown Transition Current Guiding: Institution AllIlk lopolunoonono qmolo II�I ,MMli, III II. .............. 111314 Page 24 of 98 ORDINANCE O2023-013 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, APPROVING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT #13 (SCOTT COUNTY CDA OFFICE AND SENIOR HOUSING) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN 5th AVENUE E AND 6TH AVENUE E AND HOLMES STREET SOUTH AND LEWIS STREET SOUTH WHEREAS, Paul Knutson, UrbanWorks Architecture in partnership with Steve Dunbar, Ivy Properties, applicants, and Scott County Community Development Agency, property owner, have applied for a Planned Unit Development for property located between 5`" Avenue E and 6t'' Avenue E and Holmes Street South and Lewis Street South; and WHEREAS, the property is legally described as: See attached legal description; and WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on May 9, 2024, at which time all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council that the Planned Unit Development be adopted as conditioned in this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council heard the matter at its meeting on May 21, 2024; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, that the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota hereby adopts the following findings of facts relative to the above -named request: Criteria #1: Is the proposed development consistent in all respects with the comprehensive plan? Finding #1: The current guidance for the property is Institution which allows for school, government and recreation facilities as primary uses and open space and parking as secondary uses. The institution use ceased in 2020 when the school district vacated operations in the building. The proposed PUD will incorporate a mix of affordable, senior residential housing and office uses which will be consistent with the comprehensive plan once the property is reguided to Downtown Transition. Criteria #2: Is the proposed development, including deviations from design standards compatible with surrounding land uses? Finding #2: The design standard deviations associated with this request are the approximate 40' residential building height, reduction in window percentage on the residential portion, one reduced on -site, at -grade parking stall and building setbacks ranging from 15 to 22 feet. The surrounding land uses include the Scott County Government Center, a church, a three-story multi -family senior residential building and a mix of one- and two-story single-family residences. Criteria #3: Does the proposed development provide adequate open space, circulation, pedestrian orientation, parking, recreation, screening, and landscaping? Finding #3: The proposed development provides adequate open space, vehicular circulation, pedestrian orientation, parking, screening, and landscaping, as exemplified by the proposed courtyard and outdoor patio areas as well as on and off-street parking. Sidewalks will remain along all four 1 Page 25 of 98 sides of the block as well as internal sidewalks to access the secondary entrances to the office and residential building. Criteria #4. If the primary function of the PUD is to encourage development which will preserve and enhance worthwhile natural terrain characteristics, it should not force intense development to utilize all portions of a given site in order to arrive at the maximum density allowed. Finding #4: The site is one city block with little to no natural terrain characteristics due to its previous use as a school site. The proposed redevelopment of the site will incorporate affordable senior housing and office uses in a scale that is comparable to existing, adjacent development. The project will provide additional landscaping and boulevard trees to enhance the natural aesthetics of the site. Criteria #5: Does the PUD provide an overall compatibility of land uses and overall appearance and compatibility of individual buildings to other site elements or to surrounding development. The architectural style of buildings shall not solely be a basis for denial or approval of a plan. Finding #5: There exists an overall compatibility of land uses and overall appearance and compatibility of the proposed building to other site elements and to the surrounding area. Criteria #6. Whether the proposed PUD plan would offer a greater general public benefit than would be realized under the underlying zoning district and/or general zoning provisions. Finding #6: The proposed PUD plan would afford a greater general public benefit than would be realized under the underlying R -1C zoning district and/or general zoning provisions due to the allowance of a mix of affordable, senior housing and office uses, additional landscaping and on - street public parking stalls as well as open spaces. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that the property located between 5th Avenue E and 6th Avenue E and Holmes Street South and Lewis Street South is hereby approved for Planned Unit Development District #13 (Scott County CDA Office and Senior Housing) in the Zoning Ordinance subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed development shall include one lot with one building and 98 on -site parking stalls (66 below grade and 32 at -grade). The site improvements shall comply with the approved architectural and civil plans. 2. Landscaping (including open space) shall be provided consistent with City Code requirements and as shown on the submitted landscape plan. 3. Site design and performance standards shall exceed City Code requirements, such as using LP or Hardie Plank siding with brick and glass accents as well as increased landscaping on the site. 4. The applicant shall provide park dedication fees consistent with City Code requirements at the time of Final Plat recording. 5. The applicant must provide financial security for landscaping and tree replacement (if applicable) in accordance with City Code requirements. 6. The open space area consists of the courtyard area south of the on -site, at -grade parking and outdoor patios in the northeast corner and south side of the residential building and other green spaces, which meets the minimum 15% required area. 7. Submittal and approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide the property from Institution to Downtown Transition. 8. Submittal and approval of a Preliminary Plat shall occur prior to any site grading activities. 9. Submittal and approval of a Final Plat consistent with this approved PUD plan shall prior to the issuance of any building or sewer/water permits. 2 Page 26 of 98 Passed in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held on the 21st day of May, 2024. Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: Lori Hensen, City Clerk Published in the Shakopee Valley News on the day of , 2024. 3 Page 27 of 98 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, all in Block 74, CITY OF SHAKOPEE, Scott County, Minnesota, together with vacated alley accruing thereto by reason of vacation thereof, as set forth in Resolution 82023- 070 adopted July 5, 2023, filed November 15, 2023, as Document No. A1181597. Page 28 of 98 RESOLUTION R2024-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF CDA SHAKOPEE ADDITION WHEREAS, Paul Knutson, UrbanWorks Architecture in partnership with Steve Dunbar, Ivy Properties, applicants, and Scott County Community Development Agency, property owner, have made application for the Preliminary and Final Plat of CDA Shakopee Addition; and WHEREAS, the property is legally described as: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, all in Block 74, CITY OF SHAKOPEE, Scott County, Minnesota, together with vacated alley accruing thereto by reason of vacation thereof as setforth in Resolution R2023-070 adopted July 5, 2023, filed November 15, 2023, as Document No. A1181597, and WHEREAS, notice was provided and on May 9, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the Preliminary and Final Plat of CDA Shakopee Addition, at which time it heard from City Planning staff and invited members of the public to comment; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Preliminary and Final Plat of CDA Shakopee Addition on May 21, 2024; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota that the Preliminary and Final Plat of CDA Shakopee Addition is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: I) The following procedural actions must be addressed/completed prior to the release of the recording of a Final Plat: A. Comply with the Engineering Department memorandum dated April 26, 2024. B. Easements for drainage, utility, and stormwater purposes C. must be dedicated consistent with the City Engineering Department recommendations and design criteria. D. Comply with all Shakopee Public Utilities (SPU) requirements, review and sign Terms and Conditions for Water and Electric Service, enter into a SPU Underground Distribution Agreement, and provide payment of the applicable fees. Page 29 of 98 E. A separate, 10 -foot -wide electric utility easement is required for any SPU owned electric that is currently, or will be constructed in the future, outside of the proposed drainage and utility easement. These are not to be shown on the plat but granted separately to SPU. F. The park dedication fee is due in the amount of the current City of Shakopee fee schedule. IL Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following conditions shall apply: A. Development of Lot 1, Block 1 must comply with conditions and design of the PUD #13 (Scott County CDA Office and Senior Housing). B. Plan revision comments provided on the architectural plans and civil drawings need to be made prior to submitting for building or sewer and water permit. C. New underground electric shall be constructed from the southeast corner, in the east drainage and utility easement, in the north drainage and utility easement, and shall terminate at the existing underground electric in the northwest corner. D. Plan revision comments provided on the landscaping plan for the project must comply with City Code requirements and financial security requirements set forth by City Code. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the 21st day of May 2024. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Page 30 of 98 Scott County CDA - Shakopee 5th / Holmes Senior Housing and Office Project Description and Narrative: For the past century the proposed redevelopment site at the corner of 5th Ave. and Holmes St. served as home for Shakopee's Central School, serving students and families in the Shakopee school district. The site featured a 70,674 sq. ft., three-story building, with a basement. According to the Phase I Environmental Study, the site was originally platted in 1855 for residential use. The original planned use changed. "It appears that the original portion of the [school] building was constructed by 1890. There was construction of an addition in 1929. The original portion of the 1890 building was demolished in 1950. Parts of the original building were buried on site. Additions occurred in 1929, 1948 and 1959." The school buildings were vacated in 2020. In June 2021, the Shakopee School District completed a "Community Facility Task Force — Central Building Focus Report". The report found several challenges for re -use of the buildings due to high deferred maintenance needs, size of the buildings and lot and high renovation costs. In 2023, the entire school building was demolished, and site cleared. The proposed 60 -unit senior housing and Scott County CDA office building are proposed to be constructed in 2024 with completion in 2025. The site will be redeveloped into one building. A 60 -unit, 3 -story affordable market rate senior housing facility, with underground parking, will be constructed on the south and east sides of the property. This will be home to residents 55+ years and contain a variety of units ranging from studio units, 1 bedroom to 2 bedroom plus den units. Great Lakes Management will manage and operate the housing. They currently provide these services for the CDA's nine existing senior housing facilities, including the Henderson, located just one block to the east. Attached to the senior housing facility, and located on the north side of the building will be the one- story approximately 17,000 sq. ft. Scott County CDA office. The CDA currently employs approximately 30 staff who work together to serve all Scott County communities. The site will also include on -site, at - grade parking. The 3 story senior housing portion will face 6th Ave. and Lewis St., and the Scott County CDA office faces 5th Ave. E. with the entrance towards Holmes and the Scott County Government center. Below -grade enclosed parking for the senior housing is located underneath the building, and surface parking for the office is located on site. A portion of the site in the courtyard is dedicated open space, along with a patio and open space on the northeast corner facing the adjacent church. The comprehensive plan currently indicates the site to be institutional, as it was a school up until recently. The surrounding designation is the Old Shakopee Residential, and on the adjacent block is mixed residential and a church. The plan indicates 1-3 stories, with traditional residential form and setback from 10 to 40 feet. In that respect, the proposal is consistent with the Old Shakopee Residential designation which surrounds most of the site. The office portion of the project is located towards the government center, which aligns with the institutional functions, and is also proposed as 1 Page 32 of 98 story to fit in with the scale of the residential homes across the street. With that, the building transitions from the institutional to the residential uses. The underlying zoning is R1 -C, and the proposed density is 43.6 du./acre. The senior housing maximum density is 45 units per acre. The setbacks range in between 15' and 21' on front elevations, and the R1 - C zoning indicates a maximum 30' setback. The setbacks are consistent with the Henderson one block over, which ranged from 16'-5" to 21'-10" at the front yards. Parking is proposed as a combination of below -grade, enclosed to surface parking and street parking in the public ROW. The combination of all the stalls is currently 134, and the required minimum is 60 for the senior housing and estimated 39 for the office. 98 of the provided stalls are located within the property boundaries. Page 33 of 98 c 0i 0,0 � of L�J o ISO 1J I > �� A \ \ 0 — vi H I _i— I �i U �U <c \ c Z k_ ) ` 1 mmJ \ \ 1 3 1 1$I 1 o I 1 I U I \\ i 1 to o 1 IN: ct °J�y\ 1 hii 1 \ Z/� 1 mlm J �R \� UL� ? ---V i j RGP 8" DIP W 0 cc cc c cc U m0_0 LT_ Om / \ ^c1 I.-. cc e m . c CD ICO ro \ \ \ G U) W r I • 0/\d „0L dOa „8-17 dI0 „8 M VS r� S Ana CD ro I — z w w cn w >- - J 1— D W I — a > 0 a 0 co BITUMINOUS S 0.3 M V S a CI oo M PROPOSED D & U EASEMENTS UTILITY EASEMENTS z w z rr O LS J 08 I- V) Q Lu LAJ D z Lu 2 I - LC) Ii / / �\ 0 \ ,- \ i i i i I l / \OO'S l \ \ / N N Z -I F 0 w >- (/) I- D Z Q D I 0 ix V O 1- Z EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT w cr C20 x 0 O zC° f= X H- wO Li I T N c6 c cd EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEY Oa O 00E (7 z <no w00 • O3 '- �O wO0 • .O . z 0 0 ▪ U) w. :z • C. w'w cn. uw .•0. (/) cc O • co. w 'D O ( J wg° E01- BRICK VENEER 4"x16" SPEC-BRIK COMMON BOND COLOR: GARDNER BLEND z 0 7/2 I- z w w O w M .• U W w CJ) E02 - FIBER CEMENT SIDING LAP 6" EXPOSURE COLOR: SANDSTONE BEI COLOR: SAIL CLOTH C.5 z: O 0 U cn w z. w Q • U) w w 0. CC w CC CO BUJ YO W f1) 0 O z 0 U) ww0 CC J wDO ccO- w X cn °� • w cc— wg° Oa O 00E (7 z <no w O U) • O3 '- �O O0 w EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEY • .O . z 0 0 ▪ U) w. :z • C. w'w cn. uw .•0. (/) cc O • co. w ' O (D . J wg° E01- BRICK VENEER 4"x16" SPEC-BRIK COMMON BOND COLOR: GARDNER BLEND z 0 U) I- z w w O w M .• U W w U) E02 - FIBER CEMENT SIDING LAP 6" EXPOSURE COLOR: SANDSTONE BEI COLOR: SAIL CLOTH 0 z: E 0 (7 U) F- w z w Q U) w 0 I w w cc m = Li] cc YO W U) 0 0 z 0 ww0 CC J wDO ccO- UJ U) °� w cc— wg0 Oa O 00E (7 z <no w00 • O3 '- �O wO0 EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEY • .O . z 0 0 ▪ U) w. :z • C. w'w cn. uw .•0. (/) cc O • co. w 'D O ( J wg° E01- BRICK VENEER 4"x16" SPEC-BRIK COMMON BOND COLOR: GARDNER BLEND z 0 7/2 I- z w w w M .• U W w CJ) E02 - FIBER CEMENT SIDING LAP 6" EXPOSURE COLOR: SANDSTONE BEI COLOR: SAIL CLOTH C5 z: E 0 U cn w z. w Q • U) w w 0.� U CC w CC CO BUJ YO W f1) 0 O z 0 U) ww0 CC J wDO ccO- w X cn °� • w cc— wg° Oa O 00E (7 z <no w O U) • O3 '- �O O0 w EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEY • .O . z 0 0 ▪ U) w. :z • C. w'w cn. uw .•0. (/) cc O • co. w ' O (D . J wg° E01- BRICK VENEER 4"x16" SPEC-BRIK COMMON BOND COLOR: GARDNER BLEND z 0 U) I- z w w O w M .• U W w U) E02 - FIBER CEMENT SIDING LAP 6" EXPOSURE COLOR: SANDSTONE BEI COLOR: SAIL CLOTH 0 z: E 0 (7 U) F- w z w Q U) w 0 I w w cc m = Li] cc YO W U) 0 0 z 0 ww0 CC J wDO ccO- UJ U) °� w cc— wg0 O44, t\O W (‘! ui > (055 zU) II II w >> Z w II co > acnz co , >> w as zIIo_ a_a c b U) (0 REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE 0 Z d COLOR/FINISH PRODUCT/MODEL J W O I - DESCRIPTION GRAY / BROOMEI CONCRETE SIDEWALK U- U) CO CC) CONCRETE SIDEWALK SITE FURNITURE PRODUCT/MODE MANUFACTURER J W 0 >- 0 DESCRIPTION J 0 m 2 i U) HOOP RACK 0 w 0 BIKE RACK BANCAL BENCH LANDSCAPE FORMS fD VERADEK - ECO POTTERY BARN M = W Z Z W < CO a N O LL U) LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS W U ' � N N Q I N W W 141 Q C W co (/) W O O - W u_ N 0_ O II M O - w (9 () CC Z L.f_ 0_ W W O < ti O ) I- LL D U O Cri QZ J W Y 5 a- ^< CO TOTAL TREES REQUIRED = 75 EXHIBIT A Proposed Guiding: Downtown Transition Current Guiding: Institution AllIlk lopolunoonono qmolo II�I ,MMli, III II. .............. 111314 Page 50 of 98 LS ) 08 F - (I) Q LLI LLI D z Lu 2 l - LC) Ii / i I i Wi........ -- I l \00'Sl \__ / / Dedicate D/U Cl.) `� � C O _ N - CD E E 7 " .. N oU O co C O O N C a) a) w ca IJ EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT L a) CD co E (o c O U) N a) `1) co END L N O Q. EEl2o 0 W L > egg Co 0 E cD //�� 0 CD 6U 4 ZI VI <1M eL Vy,:e 7 ij 1o" PVC 48 g" DIP / / UI 'co S O OZ 1 DLJ 0 Z LL L loow N>0 m p m �LJ (5 LJ Z Z U U Q o O 0 O co oo Z 0 Z 0 D D ICLOW IM Z Z N> O Z N N> OZ N 0 I- H 0 0 N I- H 0 N N 0 N I- H 0 N 0 0 N H Q Ln 0 N O N H- H Q 0 N §§ !±;§§§$§ f 0 6 > <zw )�§ 7< \u,% m* «6§ 2s§ <k\ 0Ez )r SECTION A -A §z 5z d§ / §§ }ix z \o 2A <0 Om 0 ER PER RING. WITH A OR APPROVED E MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDED S og OMu z00000 »O a- NG TO THE PRECAST SECTION. )(TENDING FROM w �W CC wW = m 00 W W 0Q Z (n �Z0 zU) z Q�m� Z_ Z 0 Q J M Q W W (f) CO W I — J W z z Q J W O = J Q Q CC W Z J Z 0 Q O (-) 1- O J Z_ W W Q LJ Z 0 0 Z Q O I — O LJ J I- 0 I 0 W 0 Z Q 0 0 W Z I00z CCin0� Mwwo <DI —w O Z Z -Nrr) H- 5 DOWNSPOUT 0 0 J w U) Z L� W J m W UJ w (f) w w (f)z za 0a Q> - W _J W z E 0 d 0 ' d 0 = W U) m gJ CLQ Hi w 0 Q H- 0 W w W 0 CJ w • 0 0 • Lj _0 0 U Z Q Q Z W CO LC) d - 1% MIN. SLOPE w w U7 O Z Z 00_ H- i W J Q W • W CC I — wow �U) w �Z� w 0 LLI l — U) Ow U) O ZQ 0 W LJ W H- 0 Z 0 Z ww J � w 0 � Z Q W Z LLJ ONIa1lfl8 PROPOSED DOWNSPOUT LOCATION 0 Z o� J0 5 CO N O CC M w QwZ z 0 0 Z 0 O CO W< Q Z J LU z = W Q QUO o W 0 0 D 0 cE ZLJ N 0 0 t LJ Q W 0 O Z 0 Q O W U) N LC) EXPANSION JOINT N QzH- QO z 0 Li = O d Z I E W Z W O U) w CO J W (f) ti n � m m p II m�> 10" PVC 8^ DIP x >( , ........................ Syr ........... iw W \�� City of Shakopee Memorandum TO: Amanda Schwabe, Planner FROM: Darin Manning, Project Engineer SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and Planned Unit Development (PUD) — Scott County CDA Office and Senior Living PROJECT NO.: PLAT -000212-2024 and PUD-000210-2024 DATE: April 26, 2024 The staff review indicates a request to review a Preliminary, Final Plat, and PUD application for the Scott County CDA Office and Senior Living development. Scott County CDA Office and Senior Living is located between 5th Avenue East and 6th Avenue East, and Holmes Street South and Lewis Street South. This review should be considered preliminary, as more comments will follow with additional submittals. However, the Engineering Department offers the following comments at this time to the applicant and to the planning department: The following items need to be addressed/completed prior to release of the Final Plat for recording: 1. Plan review and plat review red -lined comments are attached to this memo and must be addressed, resubmitted and approved by the City Engineer. 2. Refer to Shakopee Public Utilities comments for watermain. 3. Pay all applicable fees/charges listed below, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. • Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge • Storm Water Management Plan Review Fee 4. Submit a turning movement diagram that shows accessibility for fire, garbage and delivery trucks throughout the proposed development. 5. At a minimum, obtain conditional approval of the development's storm water management plan. H:\Development\Scott County CDA & Senior Living\Project Management Letters and Memos\Staff Review \PUD and FP Review (Scott County CDA Office and Senior Housing).docx 1 of 3 Page 63 of 98 6. Easements will be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They include, but are not limited to the following: • The minimum widths of drainage and utility easements are set forth in Section 10.1 (A -D) of the City of Shakopee Design Criteria. • Drainage and utility easement that encompasses the 100 -year high-water level of the proposed infiltration tank. 7. Provide electronic files (AutoCAD and Portable Document Format — PDF) of the Final Plat to be recorded with datum on the Scott County coordinate system. The following items need to be addressed/completed prior to approval of a grading permit, a street and utility plan and/or a building permit: 8. Pay the Trunk Storm Water Charge, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 9. Obtain final approval of the development's storm water management plan. 10. Obtain a NPDES construction site permit prior to any land disturbing activity. A copy of the permit must be provided to the city. 1].. Grade the entire site, as proposed on the approved plans, in one phase within one year from the date of approval of the grading permit application. Grading is defined as bringing the site to the proposed finished grade with materials deemed acceptable by the City of Shakopee engineering department, providing topsoil per City requirements and applying seed, mulch and/or sod per City requirements and providing an as -built record grading plan per Section 2.5 of the City of Shakopee Design Criteria. 12. Submit a landscaping plan in compliance with the most recent version of the City of Shakopee's Easement Fencing and Landscaping Policy. 13. Submit a Utility Facilities Easement Agreement. The document must be recorded with Scott County. 14. The contractor must submit a Construction Management Plan to the city prior to any construction activities. 15. Submit final construction plans for approval by the city. 16. Record plans need to be provided per the City of Shakopee Design Criteria, Section 2.5 and Section 11.2 (A -L). The record plans need to be certified and submitted to the engineering department. Provide a letter from the engineer of record certifying all H:\Development\Scott County CDA & Senior Living\Project Management Letters and Memos\Staff Review \PUD and FP Review (Scott County CDA Office and Senior Housing).docx 2 of 3 Page 64 of 98 improvements were constructed per approved plans and under the direct supervision of the engineer of record. Recommendation The Engineering Department recommends approval of the application subject to the conditions above being addressed/completed by the applicant. H:\Development\Scott County CDA & Senior Living\Project Management Letters and Memos\Staff Review \PUD and FP Review (Scott County CDA Office and Senior Housing).docx 3 of 3 Page 65 of 98 6.B. Shakopee Planning Commission Meeting May 9, 2024 FROM: Kyle Sobota, Senior Planner TO: Planning Commission Subject: PUBLIC HEARING - Preliminary and Final Plat of Maras Street First Addition Policy/Action Requested: Recommend City Council approval of the proposed preliminary and final plat of Maras Street First Addition. Recommendation: Recommend the City Council adopt the proposed resolution, as presented. Discussion: Site Information: Applicant: John Mesenbrink, Mesenbrink Construction Property Address: 1465 Maras Street Property Owner: Maras Street LLC Lot Area: 22.86 Acres (two parcels, 5.38 acres & 17.48 acres) Zoning: I-1, Light Industry 2040 Comp. Plan: Mixed Use Employment Center John Mesenbrink, representing Maras Street LLC / Eugene Hansen (property owner), has applied for the preliminary and final plat of Maras Street First Addition. The proposed plat combines the two existing lots and dedicates new drainage and utility easements for the proposed improvements to the site. As part of this proposed development the applicant is proposing to vacate certain easements on the site. The applicant is proposing to construct a 12,000 square -foot building on the site south of the existing building and construct an exterior storage area east of the building. The proposed building design and exterior materials match the building the applicant constructed at 1565 Stagecoach Road in 2022. City sewer and water has recently been added to this area and Page 66 of 98 both the existing and proposed building will be served by city services. The applicant is proposing access to the new building via the existing driveway access to Maras Street. Staff supports the combination of the two lots into one lot, as the eastern (larger lot) does not currently have access to a public street. ATTACHMENTS: o Location Map o Applicant Narrative o Preliminary Plat Drawing o Civil Plans / Landscape Plan o Final Plat Drawing • Engineering Department Comments o Draft Resolution R2024-072 Page 67 of 98 PIIOIW'I IV Not 1V � IIIIIII C?jliii Ir IIIIII�IIIIIIII� �,� H �I.I.���mlll!!!!!!!!IIIIWIIII pWIIIIIiwWlilllljllll� iIIII��N'Iw "�i�Pi'H��� Mww' VI I' Hn'Mlilll ll m,ll � liii' "� ,rl III wY' WUVNVVIVVVIWIIIII p plll IllllllNtltlN "II GN' uumlmpul I mm,IV', W u o ulll�l�l uuuuuuouYp""Y'y'161 I I u ' Imlm�lullll h g0000ulmW""" 101110',„1111,,Ilo �1�I ��r.lol i 6up m Inl�'Ir� 111l I'll I II uuluu'Iu11 lu, IIIIIIIIIIIIII u ology1111111 NII Vill1,I001111MNII °Mlllu000um IN IIIWI,����I �m11111111'lill'i°1' 11 91V"V�PII���'IuuNw�ul�Hi"'I'll'„"II'� �Iltil IIII �II °��Vpl�1'IIN�°i;lilll�lll "V�"�urNw „ollmudWl II I llo l � III�� I ' 11111llllllllllllllllullllllllla 'lllllllllll' II, 0IIIIlil1 00000004 IIII .....� iiuuu I II4I IIII '111111 I11NI1111 �ml uum ;�IldiM olVl' uW1WWW11JMW' mnoulilpp d11,1iilWlla, ml11110000 0 I ulll I X111111 lllllld llh y u IIIIIIIIIIIIgIIlllmlll iollIu@IoII ��'Nuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu r i'IY'Ii Nluolllood unnu4111111 II m�V�N�tlM",I NARRATIVE Reliakor 1555 Maras Street Shakopee, Minnesota Project Summary The proposed project is the construction of a new 12,000 square foot building, parking lot addition and other associated site improvements. The existing conditions consist of two buildings (one of which is a covered storage area), a bituminous and gravel parking/storage lots, wooded area, and a wetland. There is currently no stormwater management taken place on site and stormwater drains to Country Road 8, Hansen Avenue and to the neighboring lot to the east. The proposed improvements will consist of a new building, replacing the gravel lot with a bituminous parking lot, an infiltration and pretreatment basin, as well as bringing in new sanitary and water services to both the existing and proposed buildings while abandoning/removing the existing well and septic. The proposed building will have 6 separated bays which will be rented out to small businesses. The anticipated traffic will be light (cars and small trucks) as there will be no semis. The owner currently has no plans for any additional buildings being proposed on the site besides the single 12,000 currently being proposed. The anticipated schedule of the project is to begin as soon as possible with the hope of early September. The proposed building is planning on being constructed in the first week or two of October. It is anticipated that the majority of construction will be completed this fall, depending on the weather, and will be finished next spring/summer if need be. Page 69 of 98 OWNER: ROGOTZKE RYAN & NE Cor of the SE 1/4 of Section 12, Township 115, Range 22 E line of the SE 1/4 of Sec 12 0M0'8911Z£1 31u 0NIAMICI 89l'll£l-l£Z ON 331`0d1d aaaPlaa'.xn.N tsor zsr tss.auouaai al MSS NW INN.N3 OH WINS `NAPO le+aPa1 044E '3NI `S31V130SSV'8 213aH321 2r 9S9£* °N 'fib wopy •d sologolry ewory 03°O •oloseuulyl ;o eons egl ;o SAN SW Japan Jeaul5u3 loumese;ad pesueorl Xinp o wo I loge puo uolswbdns loagp dw Japun 3o ow dq paiodaid sox ODIC' slg; logy 6gyao Rgaiag I 9z-ef-z 9Z-SZ-I Slrafm°D .wo Ssaa°°v WillY8f's ALD panss, 33d0N Vt NOllladb 1S L 133H� O W W DC ti) PROJECT CONTACTS: O1 W W M�/� CC L Vz Q� crw Q W o L� L._._ 2 r . r ! tie 133aLS 5101,1 HOy00I"S 'Is, e01s1' -*2 ;• tZ 0N s✓Od Al s 3s i II O SHEET INDEX U 1 CYM!hI I FFf l%!P Otal.P 3IX 1 ll 0 U OMO'8911Z£1 3lu ONIAMICI 89l'll£l-l£Z ON 1331`0d1d aaaPlaa'.xn.N tsor zsr tss.auouaai ai MSS NW 'ue8e3 OH WINS `NAPO le+aPa3 044E '9NI `S31V130SSV'8 213aH321 ipulv 968£4 °N '6821 wopy •d sologolry ewory el°O •oloseuulyl ;o eons egl ;o SAN SW Japan 3eeul5u3 loumese;ad pesueorl Xinp o wo I loge puo uolswbdns loonp dw Japun 3o ow dq paiodaid sox ODIC' slq+ loge 6gyao Rgaioq I 9z-ef-z 9Z-SZ-I suarfnOD ALMJ ssaa°°v WillY8f's Alp panss, 33d0N Vt NOlllddb IS NVld NO! / f_ V- CI d- l? v C E CU f"S rE7 71- a 01 N c Q1 fQ C .2 vl a - w fv c al c 4 - fro o u U � CD y,� Y W 0�p LO'L6 0M0'8911Z£1 3lu 0NIAMICI 89l'lZ£l-l£Z ON 1.331`0d1d aaaPNaa'.xn.n SSOr MSS NW ,N N3 A1..NW'ne8e3 OH WINS 'MA le+aPa1 044E '3NI `S31V130SSV'8 213aH321 9S9£* °N 'boN Loopy .d sologo.N ewoN 0;0O •oaoseuul;y ;o eons eq; ;o uuw SW Jepun Jeeul5u3 louoiese;oJd pesueofl Xinp o Loo pub uolswadnc Wang dw Japun Jo ow - .dald sox uold sly+;oyl 4paa° Away I 9z -en -z 9Z—SZ—I S1N3Mnnoo AID SS3Naav -muffler's ALD panss, 33d0N Vt NOIllddb IS L NVld 3OVNIVeI4 / . - . - . - . - . . J . - . - . ,i ,�lll 11 f"l rIi:1///l l+Il l a 2/////// I l/ l //i:////://// j/ /'/ 1a, i /// / ///////////// 0M0'9911Z£1 3lu 0NIAMICI 89l'll£l-l£Z ON 1.031`0d1d aaaPyaa'.xn.x tsorzsrtss , ZZI55 NNINW Dii apn5 `aN+O le+aPa1 044E '3NI `S31V130SSV'8 213aH321 [pop 9S9£* °N 'fib wopy •d eologomN ewoN eW0 •oaoseuully to ems eg} to SAN SW Jepun Jeaul5u3 louoareejord pesueori Xinp o wo I low puo uolswbdns Wang dw Japun Jo ow dq paiodaid sox ODIC' slgl ;o1 6yyao Rgaiag I rz—af—z 9Z —G2 —I srrr moD .wo SS3a°°v WillYeflS ALD panss, 33d0N Vt NOlllddb IS NVld 3OVNlb' I I osos11111111111 os1111111os1111111os1111111n111" Ile os1111111os1111111umu1111111umu1111111umu1i�mll '�iN,I 111 grading is complete a dwow - e U u U I I I Q `v❑ ❑ ❑ , f. 0 IiJ -J —J IIII III 11111 Ik grading is complete OMO'8911Z£1 3lu ONIAMICI 89l'll£l-l£Z ON 1A31`0dld aaaPyaa'.xn.N tsor zsr tss.auoyaai ai MSS NW,N.N3 OH WINS `NAPO Ia+WPa3 044E '9NI `S31V130SSV'8 213aH321 9S9£* °N 'fib wopy •d sologolry ewory el°O •oloseuully to ems eye to SAN SW Japan Jeaul5u3 lou°eree)oJd pesueori Xinp o wo I loyl puo uolswbdns loagp dw Japun 3o ow dq paiodaid sox ODIC' sly+ loyl 6paao Away I 9z-ef-z 9Z-SZ-I suarmoD ALMJ ssaa°°v -muffler's Alp panss, 33d0N Vt NOWOOY IS NVld 3OVNlb' a dwow - I I E� E� I I ❑ / / 0M0'8911Z£1 3lU 0NIAMICI 891'1ZE l -1£Z ON 1.031`0d1d ,mlai'.xn.x MS,Srtss.uMN,L MSS M '00¢8¢3 M OMS `aNA M. alai 044E '9NI `S31V130SSV'8 213aH321 9S9£* °N '6821 Wopy •d sologoiN ewoN eW0 •oaoseuully to eons con to stool egg Jepun Jeeulbu3 louojaseyad pesueon Xinp o wo I low puo uolswbdns Weep dw Japun Jo ow dq pa odaid sox ODIC' slgl ;o 1 6gyao Rgaioq I 9z-ef-z 9Z-SZ-I sur3rmoD .wo SS3a°°v WillY8f's ALK) panss, 33d0N Vt NOWOOY IS NV -1d MN. TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1188 CO L N. IIIII 1010100 1010 011 N. IIIIIII 1111111 Illllu 1111111 Illllu 1111111 Illllu 1111111 Illllu 1111111 Illllu I�III"1010100 III (IIIIIII III Illllu 1111111 Illllu 11111111010100 III IIIIII III Illllu 1111111 Illllu 1111111 Illllu 1111111 Illllu 11111111111110 N II N, 90 SCHEDULE = G.) E Co IN N 0 CO C +T fQ O' 2 ' V)0 ql E G) fQ O Lf1 L H 1� Y O O U W m 0:041`0.11-7 I • J IM IUW IUZ III IUZ IOU IUZ IN IUZ IN IUZ IN 1111111 MI OM I@W Imm: IIIW IUS IUW IUZ....I0 I MEW IUZ IUZ IUZ IUZ IUZ IUZ IUZ IUZ a R um1 m uuu 1111111 OMO'9911Z£1 3lu ONIAMICI 89l'll£l-l£Z ON L33f0d1d aaaPNaa'.xn.x tsor zsr tss.auouaai ai MSS NW 'ue8e3 apn5 `aN+O le+aPa1 044E '9NI `S31V130SSV'8 213aH321 9S9£* °N '6821 wopy •d sologolry ewory el°O •oloseuulyl ;o eons egl ;o SAN SW Jepun Jeeulbu3 loumese;ad pesueorl Xinp o wo I loge puo uolswbdns loonp dw Japun Jo ow dq pa odaid sox ODIC' slg; logy 6gyao Rgaioq I 9z-ef-z 9Z-SZ-I suarfnOD ALMJ SS3a°°v -muffler's Alp panss, 33dONVI NOlllddb IS L NV -1d GOPHER STATE ONE CALL CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG E rn aE, c O a E E Z W ` r W (.5 000 U a J Z a � F MMMnM N rnn0n � o Q Q i(]�hOh 1J,1 CS NNNMN - r KKKKK :n W I I I I I I I I 000000 ®® LiJ Z -J O W Q y • d rr z • m N m Lcti= Z j —c o awe, z I_ Z rn oU HYDRANT SCHEDULE BREAKOFF FLANGE HYDRANT NO. 0 x a R 0M0'8911Z£1 3lu 0NIAMICI 89l'll£l-l£Z ON 1.031`0d1d aaaPlaa'.xn.N tsor zsr rss.auouaai ai MSS NW INNWN3 OH WINS `NI+O Ia+WPa3 044E unaaia.4 001 I} 4004, 001 '3NI `S31V130SSV'8 213aH321 9S9£* °N 'fib wopy •d sologoiN ewoN el°0 •oloseuulyl ;o eons egl ;o SAN SW Japan Jeaul5u3 loumese;ad pesueorl Xinp o wo I loge puo uolswbdns loagp dw .rapun 3o ow dq paiodaid sox ODIC' slg; logy 6gyao Rgaiag I rz-ef-z 9Z-SZ-I suarfnOD .wo SS3a°°v -muffler's ALD panss, 33d0N Vt NOlllddb IS NV1d 10211 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL I I I I I I I I I 6 6 0 a 3 E � c " E,. o a Q W u E o N °" ;1'1O,2 y m , `a E o u_ Q 'v o a o U s w n. 3 y O o,\ 1I1 uu umu uuVuuu^ umu uum umu uum umu uum umu uum umu uum umu mm umu uum uu uuuum umu um uum uum lama foam �ulmJl uum$umu uuu�.. ��•. 1111111 1111111 1111111 1111111 1111111 1111111 IIIIIIII 111111 W N Z I I I I I I u vE M n C 4-- ro O Ln U O O O W E o U wa m g IIIIIIIIS: IS IS III IS III W IS IS IS IS IS IS IIE IIIVII IS IZ 110IN luau MOM J1010 IS I IS IS IS IS IS IS IS IS I OMO'9911Z£1 3lu ONIAMICI 89l'll£l-l£Z ON 331`0d1d aaaPlaa'.xn.N tsor zsr tss.auouaai ai MSS NW 'NNWN3 OH WINS ` AWO le+aPa3 044E '3NI `S31V130SSV'8 213aH321 9S9£* °N 'fib wopy •d sologolry ewory el°O •oloseuulyl ;o eons egl ;o SAN SW Japan Jeaul5u3 loumese;ad pesueon Xinp o wo I loge puo uolswbdns loagp dw Japun 3o ow dq paiodaid Sox ODIC' slgl logy 6gyao Rgaiag I rz-e(-z 9Z-SZ-I SIN3IIROD .wo SS3a°Bv Waffle's ALD panss, 33d0N Vt NOlllddb IS NV1d 10211 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL W z o W J O Z 'o E O U Z W 66 66 6 6 t a ° 6 I I 6 I 0 NEI • I PROPOSED GATE VALVE 0M0'9911Z£1 3lu 0NIAMICI 891'll£1-1£Z ON L331`0d1d aaaPlaa'.xn.N tsor zsr tss.auouaai ai MSS NW ,N.N3 OH WINS 'MA Ia+WPa3 044E '9NI `S31V130SSV'8 213aH321 9S9£* °N 'fib wopy •d eologomN ewoN el°0 •oloseuul;y ;o eons egl ;o SAN SW Japan Joaul5u3 loumese;ad pesueori Xinp o wo I loge puo uoppuadns loagp dw Japun 3o ow dq paiodaid sox ODIC' slg; logy 6yyao Rgaiag I 9z -al -z 9Z -NZ-) sualrnOD .wo SS3a°°v -muffler's .UK/ panss, 33dONVI NOlllddb IS NVld 1N3WH L 7,- 0,') I I1 Ir; Nr 11111 1111111 1111 111111[ 1111111 1111 hire hire hire hire hire hire hire hire hire I°Iv 1111 ire 11111111 1111 hire hire hire hire hire hire re1 1111 hire hire hire hire hire hire hire hire rollIII 1111111 IN 111111 I 'CS G G E M (1) n re 110 60 100 Ibs/oc e STABILIZATION NOTES 00 @ 100 Ibs/ocre KNIMENNENNENNE 1111 II 111111 OMO'9911Z£1 3lu ONIAMICI 891:1Z£1,— la :ON 1331`0d1d aaaPlaa'.xn.N tsor zsr tss.auooaai ai MSS NW,N.N3 OH WINS `NAPO Ia+WPa3 044E '9NI `S31V130SSV'8 213aH321 9S9£* °N '6821 wopy •d sologolry ewoN eWO •oaoseuul;y ;o eons eq; ;o SAN SW Jopun Joaul5u3 louou se;ad pesueorl Xplp o wo I low puo uolswbdns Weep dw Japun 3o ow dq paiodaid sox ODIC' slg; ;o1 6paao Agway I 9z-ef-z 9Z-SZ-I suarfnOD ALMJ Ssaa°°v -muffler's Alp panss, 33d0N Vt NOWOOY IS NVld 1N3WH STABILIZATION NOTES OMO'9911Z£1 3lu ONIAMICI 99l'll£l-l£Z ON 1.031`0d1d aaaPlaa'.xn.N tsorzsrrss auouaaiai MSS NW ,N.N3 OH WINS `NAPO Ia+WPa3 044E '9NI `S31V130SSV'8 213aH321 9S9£* °N '6821 wopy •d sologolry ewory el°O •oloseuully to ems :ma to SAN SW Japan 3eeul5u3 louopsajcud pesueori Xinp o wo I loge puo uolswbdns loagp dw Japun 3o au: dq pa3odaid sox ODIC' slrll logy 6paao Rgaaag I 9z-ef-z 9Z-SZ-I suarfnOD .wo SS3a°°v -muffler's ALD panss, 33dONVI NOlllddb IS Sl CD z�m U1 K q waLU LL dz� �� 2 W 2 22 - �2 O Z Z x - C CL cets.>m p p INA 22P RIUM FREEBOARD DEPTH ERB CAN ERSI.E THE SKIMMER L ARDOR PROJECT SPECIFIC DECO TED FOR FOLLUTAIT STORAGE IY ,SED TO ENSURE ADEGEINTE POLL tYw a I RESERVER.. D INSTALL DETAIL w 4 g O Gi F m LW W q NJ O �C p w X °9i CL D w NM a au - F gz O? OzO tnHH ow ag NN pb oz a LIJ =0 � N h Z Y a✓� Z Fyw o O. , W a U Z Z O..... W fY MAXIMUM PIPE DIAMI DISSIPATOR I SKIMMER ONLY ONLY a � 6 w PIPE ;ALLOWABLE DIAMETER" PEAK FLOW 20 EFS Iv' 25015 IS 3OAFS 2t" 35 DRS 24! 50 CPS ti ,. m yr m z ¢ - � m � ' z G Q u � o > n z TREE PROTECTION INTEGRAL CURB 12 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER Z 82 gn CONTROL STRUCTURE LA Em Woowwcm sV ll OMO'99LLZ£l :31U ONIMMO 29L'LZEL-L£Z :ON 103PONd ?aaV4annnuo ISOS Z5 UTS5�auoOTTOT3 ZZI55 N W 'u OTT a1!ng'ay9d IeTaPai 044E466 •3NI `S31VI3OSStl'S 1]0H321 9S9£i °N '6a21 wopy •d soloyoIN ewON a;o0 •o;oaeuum ;o DINS eg; ;o stool et* mason Jeeul6u3 louolssesad pesueofl llnp o wo I ;ow puo uolswedns ;oenp All Jepun JO Sul Xq poJodaid sos uold sly; ;oq4 Lgaiay I tz—El-z 1Z -0—I SJNNINo0 ALTO 003000Y wulwens Ain panssI 33dONb7- NOllladb 1S L S-1/VI 0. f 1 °1- a g -III_ 3o I r �- 80 el eer krsn-O smc�n ssi S .'in E• N ii E 6 �= H 3 6 a a BSrnh D8«h� =S.0 •� / 40 3≥ 1 • _ Il z fig_ o o 0V Rw w 0a- 0Z a a I- z P� A. Z Q F3E a 8w4 Lc_, J Shakopee Public Utilities Commission Details For Watermain Construction IQ aIII apx s ¢ U g 3 w k ;a F Jw ≤pgg- u A ........ m \� �� $ g.xa d 3 2 0 L,' 1 1 0 Di sn N 1 xW 6 msa <g g 1 �: L5� s a �e=� m se w ~ w age a . ` 0.0,e `fiYa fxii 8.• ! Bo fi L7 OE elpZ r1 hi I 3 § " 9 ¢¢ 2B2 a vi d 3 �N = A m B P° c, --L!' E O E _C c.l L. fib � sF. �� �� , Bp "4$9I7 4 i°ij e out of building after backflow or include irrigation detail WAT-01 5. OMO'9911Z£l :31U ONIMV 291'LZCL-I£Z rON 103POdd ?aap4af,xixm ISOS Z5 UTS5 �auoOTeOr3 ZZI55 N W 'u OTT a1!ng'ayDd leTapai 044E466 '3NI `S31VI3OSStl'8 1]0H321 9S9£i °N '6821 wopy •d soloyoIN ewON s;oO •o;oeeuon ;o DINS °NI ;o stool et* ispun issul6u3 louolsse;oid pesueol llnp o wo I DOW puo uolswedne ;Drip Lim Jepun Jo Sul Xq paiodaid sos uold sop ;oq Lgal°4 I fZ-61-Z 1Z -9Z -1 SIEGE N00 llMJ S33900V -romans LLD panssl 33dONVI- NOIlI00b 1S L 31b'ld -IV130 1N3W03BW3 1S0d'NM 'NC 91 I 1N3W039rr3 190dWIN '1A GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. 36 IN TIRE COMPACTION 3 ROADWAY SHOULDER - FUTIilRE BRIDGE } ai L 4rr r eo N 50 urw W O 11) VIol- 4.3 • 50 p 2 WO< m rrm a Lam. U o W ON CI r v1 -o m 4 r o 9 N BRIDGE END SLOPE SILT FENCE WITH S SILT FENCE WITH SAND BAGS Q INSTALLATION AT BRIDGE EMBANKMENT ADJACENT TO WATER 0 - EC I— a LOCATION AT TOE OF ROADWAY 5 i W N R s ▪ x Si x 1 c • o o ; DI a I- 4 NI Li g • 4 N ▪ W A- w- u (/; rL.Li r i o ▪ H 0 0 0 Z Si to I— I— 3 OMO'99LLZ£l 31U ONIMIMO 29L'LZCL-L£Z rON 103rOdd ?.apyaf m.m. I90S Z54'159 �auoytla�ay ZZI55NW Oii a1!ng'aWy ,apai DVVE 044E '3NI `S31VI3OSSV TS 1]0H321 9S9£i °N '6821 wopy •d SOIOtIOIN ewoN eaOO •o;oseuum to DINS °NI to stool et* mason J88u16u3 louolssesord pesueori AInp o wo I low puo uolswedns ;oenp dw Jepun JO Sul Xq palodaid sos uold sop ;oq Lgaiay I rz-El—z 1Z-SZ-I S11.0.0.100 1110 003500Y lumens .wD panssl 33d000 NOIII00b 1S L 31b'ld -IV130 CORRUGATED STEEL PANELS PUBLIC ROAD U CROSS SLOPE 3% OR FLATTER 09 = H.L9N31 'NIW U RUMBLE PAD sC W sclo 0 W C M[BI_ 4 7 W 2 W N Li 1100 in AS REQUIRED 0 O I— iC CI W Q Z 0_o W J f J fY z 0 V diS C7 0 W 6`t3 3 5m o LOWS 0 rwi J E t k O W; yi w Z W wiz W °WWE E a C— C o I QpWy� oC Li < �WwOL g a m . 0. a O .- 08= 5 li�4c. v L. 6 ir.ba I- orol° I- O.. W W C WI 0 2d4W 4 U Kfy�7f H PaW VVyE WN3ap- e�inW1�r1 02 OF mF f0R _ J 00 N WA 4=o- r 4 W 0-0 N ~>E. F N fQ.1 "2, �mdft.fy2�f�}}+ niG"'rwo Z � w8 IZIyyi .0 i- =F ¢H ca W, Y) mow 0= A JJ a LL'W m0 ,me Zp= W ayw. W S K 1 C. L.i f}3 Oft OJ� WE 4 wO 0 IL W rc= Hal 0 m� w vwz� v r 3 gElOPI ir, 2.6.R E0 a 0 © O 0 OMO'99LLZ£l :31U ONIMIMO 29L'LZCL-L£Z :ON 103PONd ?�aV4almixm MSIWI5OaIIRL M.NW'u0 OU a1MS'ay�O IeIV, 044E '3NI `S31VI30SSV'8 1]0H321 9S9£i °N '6a21 wopy •d soloyoIN ewoN a;o0 •o;oGauum ;o DINS eg; ;o stool et* mason Jssul6u3 louolsse;oad pesueofl llnp o wo I ;ow puo uolswsdns ;oenp km Jepun JO Sul Xq poJodald sos uold sly; ;oq4 Lga/aq I rz—El-z 1Z—SZ—I S103WNo0 ALSO 003000Y -Kamm AID panssl 33dONVI- NOllladb 1S L 31b'ld 71V130 In r1 Id 8 ✓ L 3 Ed En NCO ke 4 Q Y r x Y rc o m oc 0 r8 0 w old 0 `g0 ~ W W Q O I _ W Ni SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER KCD U 0 U- z v I CONTROL LOG TYPE REPP (BLANKET) SYSTEM O X V t me e Eg a N m 3 F E 0M0'99LLZ£l :31U 0NIMIM0 29L'LZCL-L£Z :ON 103POdd ?aap4af,xixu ISO, Z5,59.au.4.1 y ZZISS NW OTTOT3 OTT oOoS'ayTO leJapai 044E '3NI `S31VI3OSStl'8 1]0H321 9S9£i °N '6a21 wopy •d solOyoIN awON a;o0 •o;osauulpl ;O DINS ag; 10 semi ay} mason .ieeul6u3 louolssalad pesueofl Alnp m wO I ;ow puo uolswedne ;warp dw Jepun JO sue ,tq palodaid sos uold sly; ;oq4 �CyyaO Lgaiay I tz—El—z 1Z -0—I S1 G 00 ALI0 003000Y -martens AL D panssl 33dONVI- NOllladb 1S L 31b'ld 71V130 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG E m. 3 TYPES' WOOD CHIP. COMPOST, OR ROCK Y, WOOD FIBER, OR COIR SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS ton 3 —1 U CLASS II RIPRAP W J I8w co LA L LIr¢ J H I- 4.1 I -4o FILTER BERMS to W I - O z 5 D. is O 0 L. N La U Y S r U =▪ C O ^p U Cr W O loll OD A 7.. F 0 U. r� u o i S 4 X Se WI § r e CO aw m E C CO In J O F R rL tn 8wi d W y NJ r Z L 0. : I NWZW 3 I.l i 'NI ww::p W w W 4 H 0a V N N C d a 0 0 STAPLES AT 1' O.C. _ANKET)METHOD OMO'8911Z£1 3lu ONIAMICI 89l'll£l-l£Z ON 331`0d1d aaaPlaa'.xn.N tsor zsr tss.auouaai ai MSS NW,N.N3 OH WINS `NAPO Ia+WPa3 044E '9NI `S31V130SSV'8 213aH321 9S9£* °N 'fib Wopy •d sopgoiry ewory el°O •oloseuulyl ;o eons egl ;o SAN SW Japan 3eeul5u3 loumese;ad pesueori Xpp o wo I loge puo uolswbdns loagp dw "apun 3o ow dq paiodaid sox ODIC' slq; loge 6gyao Rgaiaq I 9z-ef—z 9Z-SZ-I suarfnOD ALMJ ssaa°°v -muffler's Alp panss, 33d0N Vt NOIllddb IS NV1d NOI1Vi —4 EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED a t BUIIDINC/PARKING SETBACK LINE 0 a a s � 811116111616, 0M0'8911Z£1 3lU 0NIAMICI 99l'll£l-l£Z ON 1.03fOd1d aaN.n csorzsress O, Idal ZZIU 55 NINNW 'ne8e3 Dii ap n5 `aN+O leaaPal 044E '9NI `S31VIO0SSV'8 213aH321 998£4 °N '6821 wopy •d sologolry ewoN eW0 •oaoseuully to INNS eg} to stool egg Jepun Jeeulbu3 louosreeiad pesueon Xinp o wo I ;ow puo uolswbdns Weep dw Japun Jo au: dq pawdaid sox uold slgl ;ogl 6yyao Rgaaag I 9z-ef-z 9Z—SZ—I SINNIROD urn SS3a°°v WillY8f's ALD panss, 33dONVI NOWOOV IS SNOW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT E. GENERAL w o E a ❑ = >°' , O y0 a _ _ ° m a • .� _u ° E s a m o a o v 8E O 2 - ° m ° `o wo � 3 I! U o wo '1 n y m m— • a il ac y nTE Ez E O 3 Y mai a 0 3 _ c d 20 ry W a o o vn, ry 5'0-;, ° 2ai 1I o o P 84 o ill Ill o ° c E o a c 2L ,- c o c c¢ E N v ❑ a° E a E ^� a u, — ❑ N V O 0 a v u v m o° ,�. ` ,s. c - Y W 0° ° °' N 0 N ; linli!!? c a ; o m c o °° m ° a o 2' o m a o t oa _ m n ° a .°c c E U h❑❑ s' v y o 0 E E o o °oa m° v Q o o a v U a v v c❑ a o, o 0 0° o o 'i' o f .� o o o 8 d d 5 .r m a ti • m Q m U= m Ci O U li TS - E by the Owner and or Engineer. Construction limi damage during con E ner and/or Engineer E ion of improvements shown on ness shall be plus or minus 0.5 —inches and surface course shall be plus or minus 0.25 —inches. PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT E T N , 28 —day compressive strength, 5.0% air a ° a U O ❑ o c m E • ai Na O 0 o ° • c m K o°i • .0.6, .2 2F_ M ❑' .O • e O U ? d U o v d h• ° ,, ¢ n • E o E'IA E c E E ° o, o — o s.-',28 3 o t o , a 0 E 3 0°! oo c va h ° w n E M.! — E v,. o u -o v 50 ° 6 -—,2..s 2. ° c'o '' Q) a • o° v OO o U "; T -O M N n = - O E2'I E t n o, — a a o -o Ci E -E`. vc .° o m �r N °❑ U v - o° °'7' o a m 7:i E o_ _ ° v a a ❑ ° 04 1 y m w = c� $; °- o. ° o= U U h W E° o+ 5 o- o o v 3 a5i 2 v E %° o n .N 3 n c W 'c E u u°— N ° v ?.F L % ao n y ° ° � � � ❑" Z o ,.. .s � m ❑ �° °� s m v — U m v v Z � .. m ? .,, � " a a s U c o v 'o c ❑' y° o❑ i- Q m '� U m .o h W__ y o ?" o ui o m p c , o w ?. ?. 'C E a CL' v ❑ M U v o€ .Q a u 92 1.5- + o y WCi' 2„,.:,_)< o o O_ 0 o ci W: o U U a a o U a. E Z176 -1::(2t:::;::::::: .. O_ d = d m= ¢ m ci o U U ci l_ d _¢ m ci = d aid o _ I — z o � 3 o ❑ imencement E E , lateral moveme E hot temperatures using moisture curing, 100 percent maximum dry ch layer of backfill or fill material at 95 percent o 0 (per their requirements). solvent —cemented d discharge of soil —bearing water OMO'8911Z£1 3lu ONMV2la 89l'll£l-l£Z ON 1331`0d1d aaaPNaa'.xn.x tsorzs-Tss.auooaaiai MSS NW 'ue8e3 apn5 `aN+O le+aPa1 044E '3NI `S3111130SSII 213aH321 9Z—SZ—I SINNIROO AU SS3NaaV WillY8f'S Alp panss, 33d0N Vt NOlllddb IS NV1d 3 ADDITION :AS STREET FIRST the County of Scott, ibed property situate North, Range 22 West, Scott County, Minneso , 2024 the City Council of Shakopee, Minnesota approved this plat and is in compliance with the in CITY ATTORNEY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA , Shakopee City Atto v of a line 50 feet North and ?a - L=' SCOTT COUNTY SURVEYOR s amended, this plat has been reviewed and approve Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 389.09, Subd. Scott County Surveyor SCOTT COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER er of Mares Street, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability Auditor, Scott County, Minn County, Minnesota SCOTT COUNTY RECORDER as Document No. C this day of I hereby certify that this plat was filed in this U ADDITION STREET FIRST Li; •rx I I Lip • r• • nage and Utility Easement 0 SL I :- LLsTszl 3„01.r5,e9S 13 Li; I- 0 -J L 6£59 �...- ------ auawase3 411411 Pue ZZ a)ue v x w_ ry 3 L'5TT diesumoy 3 ,f iaF ET 40)104S JO a)JO eoesno5 a4a Jo JIeH Jse3 aLp Jo s4JuanaS-x1S e3 a4a Jo JIeH Tsa a ---- M 4] Jo lull 43noS n ti ... _ ... bCb Pue £Cb sebed'spaao Jo SST 4,00s ,44 J0) Juawasea aup uoisseusue,a ai_gaa13 U O m OOZbr 30 L,CS,BBS STERED LAND SURVEY NO. 24 6 palnsoeu 6L'r9Z plop 006T90 peep M„LS.9Se68N peep LB'r9Z pa(nsoaw pLF9Z pelnsoZ,6BN Pa°PaawM„Z.0S LOOM 7uawase0 LU)!J(- pue aOeule,a._-_, - LL'0SZ + L JO IL'£8Z 3„ZZ.PS,88S ',sap Z8'r9Z Al - City of Shakopee Memorandum TO: Kyle Sobota, Senior Planner FROM: Darin Manning, Project Engineer SUBJECT: Preliminary & Final Plat — Maras Street First Addition PROJECT: PLAT -000193-2024 DATE: April 19, 2024 The staff review indicates a request to review a Preliminary and Final Plat application for the Maras Street First Addition. Maras Street First Addition is located south of 13th Avenue and east of Stagecoach Road. This review should be considered preliminary, as more comments will follow with additional submittals. However, the Engineering Department offers the following comments at this time to the applicant and to the planning department: The following items need to be addressed/completed prior to approval of vacation of existing easements: 1. Conduct a title search to confirm other interest from utility holders in any existing/underlying easements on the property. 2. Vacation of easements shall be contingent on new drainage and utility easements being dedicated and recorded with the County. The following items need to be addressed/completed prior to release of the Final Plat for recording: 3. Plan review and plat review redlined comments are attached to this memo and must be addressed and approved by the City Engineer. 4. Refer to Shakopee Public Utilities comments for watermain. 5. Conduct a title search to confirm other interests on the property. H:\BOAA-PC\2024\05-09\1555_Maras_Plat\Engineering_CommentsMaras Street First Addition FP 0419 24.docx 1 of 3 Page 93 of 98 6. The access right-of-way per document No. T281287 doesn't appear to be needed. Consider vacating this right-of-way as part of the final plat. If a building is proposed over this right-of-way in the future, it will be required to be vacated at that time. 7. Easements will be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They include, but are not limited to the following: • Verify appropriate drainage and utility easements for public sanitary sewer, storm sewer and watermain systems are provided. The minimum widths of drainage and utility easements are set forth in Section 10.1.A -D of the City of Shakopee Design Criteria. • Refer to plan review redlined comments for specific locations where additional easement is required. 8. There is an existing sanitary sewer service stub located on Maras Street, north of the proposed building. Sanitary sewer service shall connect to city sewer at that location. If sanitary sewer service is installed as shown on the plans (not at existing stub) the following must be adhered to: • Execution of a Developer's Agreement, which needs to include provisions for a letter of credit or cash security equal to 125 percent of the estimated total cost of the improvements, plus 100 percent of the estimated costs of city inspection and administration. • Escrow submitted in the amount of 50% the cost to extend an 8 -inch sanitary sewer pipe to the southern extents of the property. • Submit a detailed contractor's bid for all public improvements associated with this development. 9. Pay all applicable fees/charges listed below, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. • Utility Fee (if applicable) • Watermain Fee • Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge • Lateral Sanitary Sewer Connection Charge • Storm Water Management Plan Review Fees 10. Submit a detailed lot area drawing showing the total plat area, the total drainage and utility easement area encompassing 100 -year high water levels of wetlands/storm water basins, the total area of right-of-way, the total area of conservation easements and outlots, the total area of bituminous street and the total area of lots. 11. At a minimum, obtain final approval of the development's storm water management plan. 12. Prior to discharging into a storm water basin, pretreatment must be provided. H:\BOAA-PC\2024\05-09\1555_Maras_Plat\Engineering_CommentsMaras Street First Addition FP 0419 24.docx 2 of 3 Page 94 of 98 13. The maximum allowable sanitary sewer depth is thirty (30) feet. 14. Submit a detailed geotechnical report outlining any groundwater encountered as well as infiltration rates in proposed basins. 15. Provide electronic files (AutoCAD and Portable Document Format — PDF) of the Final Plat to be recorded with datum on the Scott County coordinate system. 16. Approval of the final plat does not constitute approval of the submitted construction plans. The following items need to be addressed/completed prior to approval of a grading permit, a street and utility plan and/or a building permit: 17. Pay the Trunk Storm Water Charge, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 18. Obtain a NPDES construction site permit prior to any land disturbing activity. A copy of the permit must be provided to the city. 19. Grade the entire site, as proposed on the approved plans, in one phase within one year from the date of approval of the grading permit application. Grading is defined as bringing the site to the proposed finished grade with materials deemed acceptable by the City of Shakopee engineering department, providing topsoil per City requirements and applying seed, mulch and/or sod per City requirements and providing an as -built record grading plan per Section 2.5 of the City of Shakopee Design Criteria. 20. The contractor must submit a Construction Management Plan to the city prior to any construction activities. 21. The contractor must submit a Utility Facilities Easement Agreement to the city prior to certificate of occupancy issuance. 22. Record plans need to be provided per the City of Shakopee Design Criteria, Section 2.5 and Section 11.2 (A -L). The record plans need to be certified and submitted to the engineering department. Provide a letter from the engineer of record certifying all improvements were constructed per approved plans and under the direct supervision of the engineer of record. Recommendation The Engineering Department recommends approval of the application subject to the conditions above being addressed/completed by the applicant. H:\BOAA-PC\2024\05-09\1555_Maras_Plat\Engineering_CommentsMaras Street First Addition FP 0419 24.docx 3 of 3 Page 95 of 98 RESOLUTION R2024-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF MARAS STREET FIRST ADDITION WHEREAS, John Mesenbrink (applicant) and Maras Street LLC (property owner), have made application for the Preliminary and Final Plat of Maras Street First Addition; and WHEREAS, the property is legally described as: (See Attached Exhibit); and WHEREAS, notice was provided and on May 9, 2024 the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the Preliminary and Final Plat of Maras Street First Addition, at which time it heard from City Planning staff and invited members of the public to comment; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Preliminary and Final Plat of Maras Street First Addition on May 21, 2024; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota that the Preliminary and Final Plat of Maras Street First Addition is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: I) The following procedural actions must be addressed/completed prior to the release of the recording of a Final Plat: A. Comply with the Engineering Department memorandum dated April 19, 2024. B. The applicant must comply with the conditions of the stormwater review memo and comments on plans. C. Comply with all Shakopee Public Utilities requirements / redlines comments on plans and provide payment of the applicable fees, including the Truck Water Charge, Maras / Hansen/ 13th Ave Stagecoach Equivalent Lateral Watermain Fee and Water Capacity Charge. D. A dedicated easement must be granted to SPU for the future building's electric service. Contact SPU for additional details. Page 96 of 98 E. The park dedication fee is due in the amount of the current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule at the time of recording. F. Easements must be dedicated consistent with the City Engineering Department recommendation. G. The applicant must provide drainage and utility easements to encompass the 100 -year HWL for all stormwater basins, wetlands, and EOF outlet paths. IL Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following conditions shall apply: A. Additional curbed landscape islands and trees are required in parking areas at 1 island per 10 parking spaces to comply with City Code for the new building. B. Building design and materials and site development for the future building must meet City Code requirements for the I-1, Light Industry zone. C. Tree protection fencing is required at the dripline of existing trees to be saved prior to any excavation or construction on the site, as noted on plans. D. The existing fence along the east side of the lot that is adjacent to residential properties must be repaired and maintained in good condition. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the 21st day of May 2024. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Page 97 of 98 v v v 1O Scott County, Mln N N v C,) C CC Township 115 Nort Quarter of Section Half of the Sou t Six -sevenths of the Half of the e East Slx-sevenths O I0 18 minutes 40 77 a) ,-D N ` 0 O 0) O UJ a) 7 >• f0 4- C C t' O a © m N E O a) }a) o a C ` ? � a) N U 4--, L 2 r0 -. 4-, L W a) O m W CV EL 7 ro T7 Q C m au t c .O p C Z C C r a) N 4- L O O a) in +. 'la c1r N 0 0 2 Z v CO r >' Cr) N a) i., a) L ,C o4., n3 7 O a1 O_ yo O v -O rn c C N C 73 J L -+ O U v a) O L L yL OC _ N o w ) a v J V m W C C O a) 73 O a) C O 0 C _ ui w V O O rC) O L a) L 017 C = 0 o £ 0 > ad r t L a' N O J Q o X N C a) Cr) m V) 4' C 2 C u L r 3 7 Y C L Z u.pO V = O CTi 0 Cr) d 0 N C au2r N r` a C O 0) O t O I- d O C rro 0 ad Ili O + O U CO OWw} O ( a�1 • a) 0 N 7 O +' CA '4 — MS a-, Cr) mLn C [um C 0) Cr, L CO O N 7 m J d O (0 said South line of Scott County, Minnesota) thereof. 0 a) C me being the So s measured perpendicular to the North line thereof, Except the North 191.85 feet Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 115 North, Range 22 West, Scott County, Minnesota, described Half of the East Six -sevenths of the O W co 1 • , O2 yal J J C .0 O, C -oO C a0 V N v) -O p o a) J u o O C O U a7 a rp (n O O N i e0 s.+ O C p v p +� a) m 3-, c> Z - OU f9 C e)) T 7 2 r0 a i v 4., C_ COL W -, " E v 0) 0 0 0 co L41) J V1 co Cr)Tu 15 �. a• CC) UI c a) tea) m In f` i W (0 gal co a) C C my U) C N n -O a) � J-, Q C •a) 0 — O CL C O O C n L p X W CT) O C O V Z3 �; an O O 73 y., Ry a) •i C r Vl V a) O1 W c N C N O 0 c ° ° y CO a -d mw -O T a+ C O Q O L v VI p r-, dC0 `� J .73 0"0 V .C v, O4 -'r0° n = Ul © C C aJ a) v O ) C L "in O m 7 <- r y., Y Z7 _O (A ZJ r0 w. C O. a) VOi p.N O C y_ au ! V O vro " o av ) u N OW W a) Vi J R1 J v Cc,o ao �w ti I-LI II) da) a) c o p u, a) m m C C 4- aJ O C • v C w o aJ © i; > O _ J 1L,, f0 .- O Cy a) U) O C in O C O CV6 �I C CO > v r0 X E o N. 3 Cy) C m °� • 5 V Vl SS o c 4-, 014- x tU 'C) D 4 (IV C {+ a Ln Q N a) O C cro ._ O O @ L Ct. W L a@/1 R TO a) 't y I O . r O .... Y a) ✓ V w VO 0 a7 O O V a) 4) = E G0 w i, +-, a) In u E Qa vanavQs) O O 4-,4- x w a) 20_, N In IL N Y O C) C a1 -O C' `,13 CU CO all O L.-+ CO 'O W C an .� a1 O p a1 O C 2. Vy UJJ W "r3 © �.., Z u a) V a a N C aJ OO as., •' L r0 O O r0 O a)v_c 02 ., m an an N " C O ctZ ©w r0 0 v > C a°E�Yv�o "O O) '� E ?( C_ L N C HCC'ou7ElfW C. p O Q a) 1 Cu C O a C t' NFL a) O rar of Titles, Scott County, Minnesota, lying Southerly of a line 50 feet North and parallel to the nd Survey No. 24, files of the v - O O Cn a M C,n '~ 2 C N O CI W SJ 0 y uV al O 0 N VY � U) M C - C a7 C � J ..,- 00 U c kJ O i+ N v a) v N C N p ;• CT X C Cll, O eC p C o Z a O o Q C U O C v v o O. v .C Ny C N O C L Y L Q O a) 4.4 C .c (Lu J m a1 v O N s., 0 X ai c K C © O, O 112 1? C C D p C O Q V O O V O C 73 a u Q 0' Q Us O C C t i `�3 Cza 98rf c y 0'