Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApril 03, 2025 - Planning PacketSHAKOPEE Shakopee Planning Commission Planning Commission Regular Meeting Thursday, March 6, 2025 7:00 PM City Hall, 485 Gorman Street Vision: Shakopee is a distinctive river town with a variety of business, cultural, and recreational opportunities in a safe, welcoming, and attractive environment. Our vision is for Shakopee to continue being the place people want to live, work, and play! Mission: Our mission is to deliver high quality services essential to maintaining a safe and sustainable community. We commit to doing this cost-effectively, with integrity and transparency. 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Call for Notarized Affidavits, Proof of Neighborhood Meeting and Sign in Sheet for appropriate Public Hearings 4. Recognition by Planning Commission of interested Citizens 5. Consent Agenda These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these unless a Commissioner or staff requests, in which event the item will be removed form consent agenda for separate discussion & action. 5.a Minutes from January 2025 6. General Business 6.a Election of Officers for 2025 6.b PUBLIC HEARING - Amend the Zoning Map and Rezone property at 6100 Co Rd 101 E from Highway Business (B-1) to Heavy Industry (1-2) 6.c PUBLIC HEARING a€" Annexation, Zoning and MUSA Amendment of Multiple Properties Located Within Jackson Township 1 6.d PUBLIC HEARING - Preliminary Plat of Richland Court 7. Other Business 8. Adjournment If a commissioner has any comments, concerns or questions, he or she should contact the project manager prior to the scheduled meeting date. Also, if a commissioner is unable to attend the meeting for any reason, Please call the Department of Planning and Development at (952)233-9300 as soon as possible. Thank you! 2 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee Planning Commission March 6, 2025 Minutes from January 2025 Michael Kerski, Planning and Development Director 5.a Action to be considered: Approve Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: N/A Recommendation: Approve minutes Budget Impact: N/A Attachments: Planning Commission Minutes Jan 9 2025.docx 3 Planning Commission City of Shakopee Thursday, January 9, 2025 7:00 PM City Hall, 485 Gorman Street 1. Roll Call Present: Commissioners Forsythe, Weiler, Sandhu, Schleck 2. Approval of Agenda Motion by Weiler and seconded by Sandhu. Unanimously approved 3. Call for Notarized Affidavits, Proof of Neighborhood Meeting and Sign in Sheet for appropriate Public Hearings. We have 4. Recognition by Planning Commission of interested Citizens - None 5. Consent Agenda 5.a December 2024 minutes Motion by Schleck and seconded by Sandhu. Unanimously approved. 6. General Business 6.a PUBLIC HEARING — Amendments of PUD and Preliminary Plat of Bluff View Addition Motion to open the hearing by Schleck and Seconded by Sandhu. Unanimously approved. Staff presented the proposed changes to the approved PUD and Preliminary Plat from 2022 that amends the existing PUD and plat to allow for additional units. They are now proposing 247 single family lots on approximately 60 acres. They are proposing an increased density in the southern end of the development including 118 lots that would be 42 feet wide and 58 lots that would be 52 feet wide. These lots widths trigger the PUD requirement and the developer is once again including 15% open space and dedicating it to the city along the bluff. Brian Tucker of Summergate Development of Lakeville spoke about the project. This was approved two years ago but was hung up by the project to the east since they didn't have utilities to the property line. The feedback they received from builders is that they wanted more product types and price points. Commissioner Weiler asked about price points. Mike Suel of DR Horton excited as the builder to bring back their freedom homes, one level detached homes and mid and larger single-family homes. Trying to make a more affordable product with one and two 4 car garages. Cottages, low $400Ks, Freedom — one level with services, $mid -$500K, traditional homes are in the mid -$600K. Four years ago, homes were in the mid -$500 and now they are in the mid -$600K. Working on final designs and trying to avoid association since the dues impact affordability. Commissioner Sandhu made a motion to close the public hearing and Commissioner Weiler seconded. Unanimously approved. Staff noted that the bluff is largely being preserved. Motion made to recommend to City Council the PUD Ordinance amendments by Commissioner Weiler seconded by Commissioner Sandhu. Passed unanimously. Motion made to recommend the approval of the Preliminary Plat amendments to the city Council by Commissioner Schleck and Seconded by Commissioner Weiler. Approved unanimously. 7. Other Business — None 8. Motion by Commissioner Weiler and seconded by Sandhu to Adjourn to February 6, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. Passed unanimously at 7:28PM 5 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee Planning Commission March 6, 2025 Election of Officers for 2025 Mark Noble, Senior Planner Michael Kerski, Director of Planning and Development 6.a Action to be considered: Nominate and Elect Officers for 2025 Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: Discussion: Chair Forsythe opens floor for nominations for Chair of Planning Commission (PC). Commissioner nominates as Chair. Chair Forsythe calls for vote on nominations until someone is elected by simple majority. Chair Forsythe passes the gavel to new Chair (if there is one). Chair opens the floor for nominations for Vice Chair. Commissioner moves to nominate as Vice Chair of PC. Motion carries Commissioner moves to nominate as 2nd Vice Chair of PC. Motion carries Recommendation: Only Commission members that have served a full year may be nominated for officer positions. Budget Impact: N/A 6 Attachments: 7 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee Planning Commission March 6, 2025 6.b PUBLIC HEARING - Amend the Zoning Map and Rezone property at 6100 Co Rd 101 E from Highway Business (B-1) to Heavy Industry (1-2) Amanda Schwabe, Planner Action to be considered: Recommend approval to the City Council of draft Ordinance 02025-007, approving the rezoning of property at 6100 Co Rd 101 E (PID 279030070) from Highway Business (B-1) to Heavy Industry (I-2). Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: Subject Property: 6100 Co Rd 101 E (PID 279030070) Property Owner: Metropolitan Council Current Zoning: Highway Business (B-1) & Shoreland Overlay District (Prior Lake Outlet Channel) Proposed Zoning: Heavy Industry (1-2) & Shoreland Overlay District (Prior Lake Outlet Channel) Current 2040 Guiding: Industrial Property Area: 5.86 acres The Metropolitan Council, applicant and property owner, have applied to rezone the subject property from Highway Business (B-1) to Heavy Industry (I-2). The property is currently improved with below grade sewer and water infrastructure and was previously utilized as a sales lot for manufactured homes. After rezoning, the property owner intends to install a sewer air venting and treatment system to address historic odor issues, as well as corrosion of Metropolitan Council and city sanitary facilities. The system will be partially powered by proposed ground -mounted solar panels, which are considered an accessory use. The proposed structures will house equipment and will be limited to a max height of 20 feet. Development of the site will be subject to the review comments received as well as city code requirements including but not limited to setbacks, impervious surface, landscaping, etc. prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits. 8 The City Council may grant a zoning ordinance amendment when it finds that one or more of the following criteria exists: 1. The original zoning ordinance is in error. The original zoning ordinance is not in error. 2. Significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place. Significant changes in goals and policies have taken place. The applicant is proposing to redevelop the site consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan to address historic odor issues. The property is adjacent to other Heavy Industry (I-2) properties and is along County Road 101 E which is a minor reliever roadway. 3. Significant changes in city-wide or neighborhood development patterns have occurred. The property is being redeveloped into an odor control system and solar array which is consistent with the Industrial guiding of the property in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Heavy Industry (I-2) zoning designation is consistent with the zoning of properties to the south as well as a majority of the properties to the east. 4. The comprehensive plan requires another provision. The comprehensive plan guides this property as Industrial. Rezoning the property to Heavy Industry (I-2) would bring the property into compliance with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Staff believes the criteria are met as note above; therefore, staff support the requested rezoning. Recommendation: Approve the suggested action. Budget Impact: None Attachments: DRAFT Ordinance_O2025_007 Applicant Narrative Area Zoning M a p Site Plan 9 ORDINANCE O2025-007 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP ADOPTED IN CITY CODE SEC. 151.003 BY REZONING PROPERTY AT 6100 COUNTY ROAD 101 E FROM HIGHWAY BUSINESS (B-1) TO HEAVY INDUSTRY (1-2) WHEREAS, Metropolitan Council, applicant and property owner, has applied to rezone the property located at 6100 County Road 101 E from Highway Business (B-1) to Heavy Industry (1-2) Zone; and WHEREAS, the property is legally described as: That part of the southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, lying northerly of the northerly right-of-way line of the St. Paul - Minneapolis and Omaha Railroad, and lying southerly of the southerly right of way line of State Highway # 101, except for the east 583.22 feet thereof, according to the United States Government survey thereof, Scott County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on March 6, 2025, at which time all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council that the subject property be rezoned as stated; and WHEREAS, the City Council heard the matter at its meeting on March 18, 2025; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, that the City Council of the City of Shakopee hereby adopts the following findings of facts relative to the above -named request: Criteria #1: Finding #1: The original zoning ordinance is in error. The original zoning ordinance is not in error. Criteria #2: Significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place. 10 Finding #2: Significant changes in goals and policies have taken place. The applicant is proposing to redevelop the site consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan to address historic odor issues. The property is adjacent to other Heavy Industry (1-2) properties and is along County Road 101 E which is a minor reliever roadway. Criteria #3: Significant changes in city-wide or neighborhood development patterns have occurred. Finding #3: The property is being redeveloped into an odor control system and solar array which is consistent with the Industrial guiding of the property in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Heavy Industry (1-2) zoning designation is consistent with the zoning of properties to the south as well as a majority of the properties to the east. Criteria #4: Finding #4: The comprehensive plan requires another provision. The comprehensive plan guides this property as Industrial. Rezoning the property to Heavy Industry (1-2) would bring the property into compliance with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that the request to rezone the properties as stated in this ordinance is hereby approved. Passed in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held on the day of March, 2025. Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: Heidi Emerson, Deputy City Clerk Published in The New Prague Times on the day of , 2025. 11 VIA EMAIL ONLY December 20, 2024 City of Shakopee 485 Gorman St. Shakopeet. Michael, MN 55376 Attention: Gia Eley or Kelly Busko Subject: Rezoning Met Council Parcel 279030070 Greetings, Re: Met Council Project No. 809510 Shakopee Odor Control Improvements Met Council is pleased to submit an application to the City of Shakopee (City) to rezone 6100 County Road 101 (Parcel ID 279030070) from its current designation of B-1, Highway Business to 1-2, Heavy Industry. Rezoning would allow construction of Met Council's Project 809510 - Shakopee Odor Control Improvements (Project) in the near future and meet long term rezoning goals outlined in the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Envision Shakopee 2040). The proposed Project includes installation of a sewer air venting and treatment system to address historic odor issues in the City, and corrosion of Met Council and City sanitary facilities. The system would be partially powered by ground -mounted solar panels. Trees identified in the tree inventory would be protected and additional native vegetation installed. Preliminary Project plans and related documents required for this application are attached. Based upon discussions with the City Design Review Committee earlier this year, Met Council's consultant, TKDA, has reviewed Chapter 151.009(B) of the City's Municipal Code and finds the rezoning would meet the following criteria: • "Significant changes in city-wide or neighborhood development patterns have occurred." o The properties in and around the County Road 101 corridor have seen change and redevelopment over the years. The corridor is a part of the 'East End Planning District' in Envision Shakopee 2040. In order to be consistent with the future land use designation for the site and meet the goal of creating a `welcoming gateway' in this planning district as identified in Envision Shakopee 2040, a rezoning of the property is needed. • "Significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place." o Guiding the Met Council property and surrounding properties as `industrial' under Envision Shakopee 2040 is a significant change in community goals and policies. Rezoning the property now to accommodate the Project would conform to these long term goals. • "The comprehensive plan requires a different provision." o Same as above. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at 651-325-6378, jeffrey.schwarz@metc.state.mn.us Respectfully, Jeff Schwarz, Met Council Project Manager 390 Robert Street North I St. Paul, MN 551 01-1 805 Phone 651.602.1000 I Fax 651.602.1550 I TTY 651.291.0904 I metrocouncil.org An Equal Opportunity Employer METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 12 (1) AC W W O L 0. E O O O a. a) V a (L;), Q (NI O c ?' ca ca V� () LL SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee Planning Commission March 6, 2025 PUBLIC HEARING - Annexation, Zoning and MUSA Amendment of Multiple Properties Located Within Jackson Township Mark Noble, Senior Planner Michael Kerski, Director of Planning and Development 6.c Action to be considered: Open Public Hearing Take Comments from the public Continue public hearing to April 3, 2025. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: The City of Shakopee is proposing an Annexation, Zoning to Agriculture Preservation (AG), and an Amendment to the MUSA (Metropolitan Urban Service Area) in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This request includes approximately 61 acres comprised of the following 11 properties located within Jackson Township: Property Identification #'s 069150011, 069150360, 069150346, 060360020, 060360030, 069140120, 069140130, 069140160, 069140170, 069140140, any adjacent rights -of -way, and the right-of-way of 125th Street West located east of CR 69. The Annexation of these public rights -of -way, Scott County property, and private properties are necessary due to proposed development of land including or adjacent to these areas. The Weber, Breeggemann, Melchior and Bauer properties along Old Brick Yard Road (CR 69) are adjacent to or included in areas that proposed public utilities and public roadways are to be located, with development planned in 2025/2026 for these areas. This includes the extension of County Road 16/17th Avenue and public utilities extending west/south of Bluff View (the development of approx. 80 acres of Breeggemann property). The properties would come in as Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zoning, but staff anticipates rezonings of several of the properties within the year. The other properties are for parcels the existing property owners are interested in developing and Scott County parcels that are adjacent to the City of Shakopee boundaries that are logical for 15 annexation. MUSA expansion is required for the properties identified on the attached MUSA map, as those parcels are shown as proposed for annexation in 2040; whereas, development has proceeded such that expansion of MUSA to these areas are necessary now. Recommendation: Approve the requested action. Budget Impact: The area of the proposed annexation is right-of-way/roadway easement which is not get taxed, Scott County land, and land that will trigger a payment to Jackson Township, consistent with the formula incorporated in the Orderly Annexation Agreement. Attachments: Site Aerial.pdf Orderly Annexation Map.jpg Overall MUSA Map - Proposed.pdf Detailed MUSA Map - Revised.pdf 16 LLIu{1 7V Can erbur Road NId3NN3 p L al all? r tiraari Mar c� i� T �1 Zvi11757411 , it W J CC O CC a o, w LL I J 0 J Existing MUSA O O O 0 0N O O O O N N N 0- SMSC Holdings • Fl El El El c, LU w CC L-1 0 z Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community 19 0 N SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee Planning Commission March 6, 2025 PUBLIC HEARING - Preliminary Plat of Richland Court Mark Noble, Senior Planner Michael Kerski, Director of Planning and Development 6.d Action to be considered: Recommend to the City Council approval of Resolution R2025-003, a Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat of Richland Court. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: Stonebrooke Engineering, on behalf of Matt Logeais (South Oaks Realty, Inc., property owner) has made application for Preliminary Plat of Richland Court. The subject property is located north of CSAH 78, and east of Townline Avenue (County Road 79). The applicant has proposed a plat that would consist of 10 single-family residential lots on 4.38 acres, and two (2) outlots (storm pond and a wetland). The development is compliant with the requirements of the single-family residential guiding and the R-1 B zoning. The developer has provided images of the proposed structures, of which there are several varieties with different design elements. There is proposed a stormwater pond located just east of Townline Avenue (County Road 79). City departments, Scott County and other outside agencies were given the opportunity to review and provide comments regarding this application. Significant time was spent on the design of the access to Townline Avenue (County Road 79) to ensure compliance with Scott County design standards. Comments are attached to this report and have been incorporated into the draft Resolution. Staff had many interactions with neighbors located within the area of this proposed project, with some expressing concern with the density and potential traffic generated from this subdivision. This property has been zoned R-1 B since at least 2006, with design standards requiring a density of 3-6 units/acre. This plat layout is consistent with the density, which is required not only by the city but by the Metropolitan Council. Proposed traffic improvements as mentioned previously will be compliant with Scott County requirements for this type of roadway/subdivision. 21 Recommendation: Approve the requested action. Budget Impact: N/A Attachments: Richland Court PP Resolution.docx Site Aerial.pdf S1169PP01-Preliminary Plat - 22x34 (L)_v1 redlines.pdf S 1169-PLANSET 2025.02.23-2.pdf S 1169-PLANSET 2025.02.23-3.pdf S 1169-PLANSET 2025.02.23-11. pdf S 1169-PLANSET 2025.02.23-12. pdf S 1169-PLANSET 2025.02.23-14. pdf S1169-PLANSET 2025.02.23-16.pdf S 1169-PLANSET 2025.02.23-29.pdf Richland Court PP Engineering Memo.docx SH Richland Court Addition Review Letter.pdf S1169 -Right In Right Out 2025.02.18.pdf foto 1.jpg foto 2.jpg City Response Memo.docx 22 RESOLUTION R2025-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RICHLAND COURT WHEREAS, Stonebrooke Engineering, applicant, and South Oaks Realty, Inc., property owner, have made application for Preliminary Plat of RICHLAND COURT; and WHEREAS, the property upon which the request is being made is legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Bechrich Park Estates, Scott County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, all required public notices regarding the public hearing for the Preliminary Plat were duly sent and posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the Preliminary Plat on March 6, 2025; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Preliminary Plat on March 18, 2025. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota that the Preliminary Plat of RICHLAND COURT is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: I) The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the release of the Final Plat for recording: A. Approval of title by the City Attorney. B. Comply with conditions identified in the December 27, 2024 memo and the redlined plans from City Engineering. C. Comply with SPU standard terms and conditions. Developer will be required to pay Trunk Water Charge to SPU for net developable acreage. SPU will pay the developer trunk oversizing where SPU requests pipes larger than required to meet the lateral requirements per SPU Water Policy Manual. Utility plan revisions are required and have been provided in the e -permit system, on the construction plan set. D. Further electric design review and discussion required for SPU existing overhead electric along West property line. Other small utilities have attachment to SPU overhead facilities and would be required to relocate should SPU need to relocate existing overhead to underground due to NESC vertical clearances from Kristal Court Road. Developer would be required to install SPU conduits if relocation is required. SPU electric per lot fee applies for joint trench small utilities construction. Payment 23 required before joint trench construction. SPU requires signed electric terms and condition and signed underground distribution agreement from developer. E. Comply with conditions identified in the February 25, 2025 memo from Scott County. This includes compliance with Townline Avenue (CH 79) roadway design improvements submitted with this application and approved by Scott County. F. Comply with landscape requirements of the City Code Sections 151.112 (Landscape Requirements) and 151.113 (Tree Preservation Requirements). G. Construction and development of lots shall comply with the design standards of City Code Section 151.034 (Urban Residential Zone). H. House design and performance standards shall be compliant with City Code Section 151.108 (Construction Material). I. Park dedication fees in the amount required by the City Code and adopted City fee schedule shall be paid prior to the recording of the final plat. Adopted in Regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held on the 18th day of March, 2025. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Heidi Emerson, Deputy City Clerk 24 9Z 6MP LOdd69LLS\sa1!HPPoO\(a.0,11 -IS 10 1(1!0 `S3JVJS3 N21Vd HO121,039 'L >1.019 'l }off 10 IDIdad) 691LS\saw.H Pu.143!9\J.3/,1f1S\Sl33r02,1d\:S — wdZtrL — tZOZ 'SZ ^oN LZ M N p 2 z W , Cn o a w ~ W > L Z ? O Z � w � a o z ad g O o N No o {+Fd� W z• ga U w . �.o o , z o wZ 3vi d.gK o z z z w o N w Noz RI Oro o za�w �n w � Ow � U�,V-i �Na ooO ww U� o F r� Giz s 10 a W ON era a z r �`'o N �zoa�¢7�j mz wi ao as yO �pi: sN ; 1w� a NoiR N a t o� 7, 9 J a m O or a m p a p w f o l 2 F z O' o�=`X�i a�cw� z3o �d aaN ow o?� o� a o� o o�v_U5o a 3 Oo L- p zE O� p I W wo ro z wg a a� Tiw 3 K^ r U W Z U= U g U O W I —1(i.-.,% W r D d' R' J O 2 K E x O awUNJ zoN Or Wp r� w' ZzrW a� o� ooW�7W�r� €o oi.i? �€ WQ Wa m� wpW' z� my U�?��zWwo zwio wag �E' }¢ 0 4 Na Na N �¢zO za �2w�wg Ooz �-Zzoa X�2 wY P N¢ rw RIP wx vxiw oa WXWOzaa� >�a xam �r-lo aw oz pm r�� �r o xo Ow mW�vio�xoo wx z0 ¢� 0 3 orwora?zwNU Wc°moZ on haw N wmOw z�o�� Pt �zFo wWTz pi, �iSONa Jor�ng e 5 U 7 owm? ��cz-i-i �z7 Ozaw a J U' :!II m �m w =��� zwmU z7 7�Qm vow p�o� i'm23 No>mm INg RICHLAND HOMES - SHAKOPEE DEVELOPMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN Z Lo§ = vwi w a O N v z a z I o w m z Q a m N z a � � � Z Noz �o zz aiswr O� WFZra via Zw p> a-i-ivo-i aw �a�`a >> w oo �px¢wXNz� O�NNZ Imo wW zN �� �� wxw wWi p m� >� ��a�iiw�oWo�� �PNr w Nar 77 a ww wm ��og h� N N� =r >lm:Q.�,or �awv�� w� z� �� �w JJO x�wa zw o w� o Jz��> aN�J o�WW ME gin wW =?z� oo r 0 J O W 0 wo K W a U ar 7U \ \ � � � J W K w 3 a � \\ X /\ \ \\ I O c� ? U ♦ \ ♦ z mzaww z � W O Z z w or O LI O p H N W r J m > w m N � � a? � � 2 z z z� z W �_ z rr-n g NO 1 2 w ¢ r X w wN w ~ m w U' O 2 U U� U ' 7 J O O U �r U J w w m m � 3 O a aw a Lit, U o (i?'NoO§ iwYa0m Wgamz wad m !a € i!ig aazNZ 7¢�r�rwONw3 No_zW w W Y Z Q r O g N W NQ Z W¢ wrQOW JE Wiiz N w3a Noz mWx� �aO N oo !w Nro�N mox i 000 5� O orW�O zw� W� zzONzoz Orzz v�rx i;3m >� �? a�O oow� �r W >W i � Fcoi�F®'.a �awWE F� aO 000 ��o ���� oo�z a=o7�Y� �`` d ' o≥r ¢g �Nw a gZm zoz� ozw mo pz ozz8mr= d � ¢ �� � z¢ �/1 r U w w O> ¢ O z 6= N r � Om¢�r �r> NO ow(� N OO7 0 r w r0 m a0Or00 Oo J KIr_ W (� �> W FO 1d� U Q 3 O z W� 2 U U�¢ O W U 7 p U ¢ J � J U D Z W 7 r O 0 I S� ¢¢ x w N4a 3 W. rg ¢¢� i gp a W ¢ 0 F W o,i W o Ew K N N �� ow0 O K W. .7 K �J YLL� f �J > �rw 3 O r m N �� a r r 7 � N ri N Yii oaf wz zom �� zz� ��J� owo �m I� c�ZZaUo CO O7; oww xo Ow¢ oo� JJJ2 raz a� zw poo XSwwz p UUo U�r rU U�x a� UUa c>UaN NNa a s7 O� JUUmwaz.a hl; ri ri a ui o m a Stonebrooke a -- __---/ -' �,-- - / --- , \‘‘ \ \ / / i 1 // / , \ •,,\ \ \\ I I I / / '_-' \ \ —\ °sp / I 1 1 I � , ` 1 1\\ \\\ \1 _ \\ \ \ :=V wo /L J wOF Ow X N O W lal r G 7J I I I I I I I I m I I II I I 1 I II I 1 1 1 1 I 1 II 11 1 11 1 11 \ \ 1 \\ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \\ \\\ \ ' do/ r \ I\ I 1 I I / \\ \\ \\`\ \\\\ I I j I Q U Z I \\ I l 1 I I I. OFJpW � 1 / / / / I I � I r �X JN \ / I l I I I wZ�W \ I 0 / / I I / / O= O I I O �m I r m w S 11 II 1 I I ' I I 1 O7O 1 I l i U (xn U a \ \ I / I w 1 Iwc7 ' ligl i / , m I / \\\\ \\\\\\ \ \ / / / , ' //..♦♦♦ II 1 II 1;. / / / � I I I I I z a R - Q a W Q N 0 w = U(] 7 W 4 4 N � W }H m W p0 ;1 ', a 2 O K U� ' N .. !-h.) w , , , \ \ s SB \ \ /j / l .♦�.�i�♦♦� rn I \\\ \°6�\ \\\\\ \\\ \ \\\ \\\\\ / / III \\'♦♦♦♦♦�/ I I \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ w / / \\\rI I1 0 \\\\\\\��v''y/\J^Iw i ♦♦I\ \ 7;\ o J .v ____ _ ___„, ____, _ , _ \ r ,/ \ \\ r? Fj94---1 I � 1,♦\ . .,,,,, , ,.aa``/,I \- , § ___---, , _ ____-, ____ —________ _ / \`` ♦ \ w W J \ I jl i 1 4Y I I I m 1 11 , , , ♦ 1 \\I \\\ \ d 1 1 \ Y2�\ n'_ II o � � � \ tG� � a a (s , \\\ 1 --'' �F68-__ - _ �' / N `.. , g w \ oo -„9 --- - -- oo az \ i�"..� �2 U rq� \\\ ,, Waw ;LI i mz� _, — --- , z `- 898'-' `. r `` -_ '__ oar q a --- ---'" ', ---------------- 1 \\___— ❑ 1 ,. ) , ,, , \ 111\ \I\\\ 1 ' I"t. 311 , \ 11 \\\ \ I\ wa \\ s oo , \ t i �7d" , <, I \ \\ I n" I O / \ m5 / o a' ' - \\ 1 \\ \\ - - \\\N, A\- \ \\A„,\ -''' ,,,, , , ______________ __ ____ \ '_-, p BIIR / PIIIR r 9U��-_,BUR �\ �-mBYIR \\ rBU�/ I ,/ - P BVR /� .� �- - 6rnP OW3O—Z-69//S\saIi} pu"Iyol) — — .'LS, — SZOZ `U'Z qa3 8Z 8li O N M Z CIVIL SITE LEGEND: CONCRETE (SIDEWALK) (SEE DETAIL 4001) STREET BITUMINOUS (SEE DETAIL 1001) PED RAMP (SEE MNDOT STANDARD PLATES) GENERAL GEOMETRIC AND PAVING NOTES: � } r aJa a O [.!Z N r O 1 Or6) ZOCNA K� O ,„1,a O U w O Q ¢ a H w J N � U_ W F g W 11'7' 'm O W O r Q Q w W� =03 3=o Nww o o ON oaa�r cwiQo N o 0 3 z O 7� zwor oaf �oQ a f/1 'w wzao: w'nwx rzz ¢ z a oo �?�? waJ a � Qz �a�� aNZ ozo w x N J w ?+ Z U x W= O O 3 O O g 3 J a0 0 f i 1 3 Q zQ N N 2�� W O a r O O Z p m Z N Y O J U p !15 M 4 N D I: O O ON W W 00 a0 I / / 573 0 03 S9'B88:03 o �93 0 T69:03 00 l8'96&03 l8'S68:03 00 lS'e6e&09 m LT.9:03 n 61'068:03 g eo'e6ea. m 60,69:03 o ;09 0 SV006:03 rl M RICHLAND HOMES - SHAKOPEE DEVELOPMENT STREET PLAN - PLAN VIEW Y .O N O co Z a U` Q ¢ a 6n^P'51IV130 0NV NV0d Pool — 69.\6ui-aaud6u3 1.)-19.u015\ :0 — woBS ll — 1101 `00 00 6Z Z • GRADING LEGEND: J o o > U U O U � Z O J o g J W N Z (.7 U L � w w O Z 3 0 ) z w w tan a a c .7 w w v 3 3 6f H I a GENERAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES: ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. W N � z o �z La RL taiio� x a ox o � F o o F '6lall a z z > p W O O O li N J Z U H O H K W Q O a W p Z Q woWa a a z3 ao m O O �5�z 9 o waW oo � O W O Q m v O pQ vaNt O in Oa � O � ~tn (Nn m� Q zww w a Lazo oa�a k F y w� NO a � a W �>F>wyw�>�>wy tanw�w a N M In f0 r N OI VW- / - L \ a� � r _, O IJ� N r � J • • CONTRACTOR WILL DETERMINE PAD HOLDDOWNS U cD O M L'13 N LL rz ROAD HOLD DOWN CUT / FILL QUANTITIES ARE FROM EXISTING GRADE TO FINISHED GRADE ------------------ ----------------- - ------------- ---- 7 BUILDING PAD LEGEND: GRADING INFORMATION: r I / 1 FF - FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION o c � co ti o aLll � o \ • t Bi B - BASEMENT ELEVATION rl M RICHLAND HOMES - SHAKOPEE DEVELOPMENT GRADING PLAN Y 2 .O O co Z a (7 ¢ LIA Q a 6Mp 0V,10-1,69,S\saIi} pip — 69,S\6ul-,aau!6u3 1..-19.u015\ :0 — wo6S ll — SZ0Z `,Z ga3 o£ M N Z EI i w z O M O I 7 W H O Z V SANITARY MANHOLES SHALL HAVE WATERTIGHT LIDS. 0 I PB cp,i G ggII�� P BIIF �yP gd, O M fn WATERMAIN SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ,&9'6=H1d3 ,9Z'91=H1d30 Iln�� aiN ao o § x Oap D z S M fi fn U 0_ 00 N rn 125.74' OF 8" PVC SDR 35 45'968:9d N £5'56893 Zb'968.93 6L'168:03 °L'568:. N4L' 168:93 6£568:04 Z6,69:03 :9d Sb'668:93 00 :9d 9l'Z06:93 RICHLAND HOMES - SHAKOPEE DEVELOPMENT UTILITY PLAN - SANITARY SEWER Y .O N O co 6MP'12JV11NVS Zl 6911S\saki} poo\}uauado�ana4 puoiyois — 6911s\6ui-aau!6u3 1.)-19.u015\ :0 — wo6S ll — 5(09 `,Z 9a3 L£ li On M Z GENERAL WATERMAIN NOTES: WATERMAIN LEGEND: o - Z ® ^O ®® M O r 21- "R Z OI IQ z3 :2g xo Z W O W W U O I zo cD X O L zw r w o Lc% � �6w p W EN p L U V i Z I i d 6 w m U U F Fp Z W O U Z Q U Q Z E w a U J pF z p d. 2 Z U Z W 6v �taff�wNtVi�m � n w O w Q w zpw xmFF~O� 3a O � Y> W 4 j Z z� 3omE p= a w J d ll!!LC.:&,! ZQO ?j jao;Pt," 6r, oa�w tna � in �oz tn��� ao za U UO a=aOOtntng �� to U }m O O W N W � I � N 3 � J � J x�a oE0owooNO JJ JJ a H v 3 U O� H 2 p p U O Z J a30 3o wi z to o a"is o z H QQapvZ�oN� z yU tWri > W N W N z N o w O ri�LLi Fm�?Opw �¢� m�z p w to t'itz Ur.5 � � o � o a w� ��o Ww�pvNtn1¢ cZ� Zo a v U az Z p Z U W a Z z m p a Z �—` �+ Z O x Sz 3z�nw� :q; Omho������ �zo �aQ�a�'� �2 zo b NFw ~ww��notnxW¢�zgw3pao�� wN> 0o0Leo.T!!!3r,tn xz� axx xo mow?wo �x ow 3 3a 3th to Na ��� t�tn? om oN >33 Ux It) ti n 00 O O � I a 1z 2 o -F �a 1 J W W tr a w?r 1 ---___ -- --_J- O N W zw M � ILI t0 APPR❑VED F❑R ❑NE YEAR FR❑M THIS DATE OOi § oOD u0 um0 § l ,L6'L-=H1d30 / ,65'0 =Hld30 N 1 0£'U =H1d30 ' w S zz I o ,08'8=H1d30 N c0 00 xl Kg (p J X � w 0 o m rn m w rn to m to m J m o ss•ose:w n • 169:93 O 98.96893 91'969:93 o £4.969:9d n 01,69:03 o 21.969:9d N 64'669:03 OZ'968:93 6£'46993 :93 t 68'86993 rl M RICHLAND HOMES - SHAKOPEE DEVELOPMENT UTILITY PLAN - WATERMAIN a) .O N O co 6MP'NIVW2J31VM tl 6911S\saki} poo\}uauado�ana0 puoIyoi'i — ilooagauo}s\:0 — wo65:11 — 5606 `60 gag Z£ rl M • 8li O ' M Z STORMWATER MANAGEMENT LEGEND: 0 El 8 .�.r_..,..r..�s.n..s..s..•:..•:..yes;_a...e..:..,�n..:.v..v..v...�...•.e...a::.a,_.ao•.:..c..c.c.c.r:.•_:.•_....;�,_a.;.eie� �..� AdiMMOr ----------------- — — — — GENERAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES: SEE CIVIL SITE PLAN FOR SITE LAYOUT. PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS AT ALL TIMES. M Q 6 I, W m O^ O I � /o I I I I 11 1 I 11 I 1� 1 1 I 11 II 1 I ll • • • AMOMMMOMMEMOMMER ASIMMIMMEMEMEMMEME • • N O V 1 w U- 0 O O V J I - N O FES-500 TO N O (/l W U 0 F- O O M� 0 O m E ro E In o o rn m ai m ro o £9.98893 £9'999:93 0 69'06993 69'069:93 6L'L88:93 ‘An- 6,99:93 .8'888:93 L8'888:03 + 99'.69.93 N 99'.6993 RICHLAND HOMES - SHAKOPEE DEVELOPMENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Y .O N O co } 6MP'213M3SW?JOIS Sl 69..S�sa�l} poo�}uawdo�ana4 puo�yoly — 69,S\6ui-1aaw6U, ,00Jgauo}S\:4 — �d00 Z. — SZOZ EC � SUMMARY : I SIZE I ROOT I QTY. e a, ; o O,� RICHLAND HOMES - SHAKOPEE DEVELOPMENT LANDSCAPE PLAN b § ) ) ., ) / e a \}( � \ } 2 2 2 - \ q § / 0 k / & xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx LAN DSC SYMBOL I BOTANICAL NAME I CO t � � § PICEA ABES NOF EXISTING TREE INVENT �)\/ el q%,,,,,, 2Es' §t/�k \b $�/\)22§222\/7/772]22§2]2/2222§2222§2]2]&222H S - n n �_§}\ ` R ) 2 ��,iw»» »bke§kbpbkvbbbbbwvwk,,wb,,,,b,rbb»»»k,3»»» C000 z79,EC niig)})7%2)/2272%222)§§M nE,§§§§/7§§%§§H M Stonebrooke i N — \ LOT 6 i . II ,- III- `III �II II � \� — • — __— �'/ \\ \\ I � I II I I I '\\ \\\ I / \ \ 1 — �, I , II 1 J I • III ,\ II II VI I I .� ..I DRAINA MENT I IIII III I� I /� o I I I 1 P WETLAND II. _ I I � III II 1 \ \\\ \\� � i / / 0 HWL: 894.2 .4`i I III I I LOT 9 III , I II II \\\ \\\ / I I I I I I I LOT 7 \ \ /, . I LOT 10 II I I III II LOT 8 I I I I \ \ �s - I \\ ' I I I I I 1 \ \' . j I III III II III III I\I / \\ / \ �.. � III. III II III III III III / / i' , / \ I I III III I I I III III + I I I III \\\ \\ I/ '' \ .. II \ III III III I I III i' / \ • 1.• •�wi �e \I III �I � — - II II '/ �lJ�� / \ p°� °P I I II I _ - I I 1 i' �ys'K �5 S.''''".LgIMS 1i ELMS I _ _ - ---,, II I II II II I/' QfiOP / B 14"j�^I ''',0^ _ lJ " ELM 1- I II I I - / 14 \. ,"Q. 1 �1. 2" El µG" EL E FILM i I I ' I� / 0 L. ' ELM F I _ _ _ / °uELMLIMS�3 7" ELMS/2 I ---__I I _ J3" ELM ELM .�:°�� I / �a tIMM5"�LM„S ELM" ELMS I _ pROPER'fY UNE 2 / \ a / — \ L r9'0, \`N §_ 6 h juui \\ § fl /j §) gi : (\ 0 0 r-JI 3»E [ L \@ 5 » § , , ,� ,„. . ° t / ��,-- — — — — _ ) § &PeA±:A:-R-9rs\q4 polac6mg piia-69s\6! 69 1..-19.u015\ < -aaesL-96O660 9a City of Shakopee Memorandum TO: Mark Noble, Senior Planner FROM: Darin Manning, Project Engineer SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat — Richland Court Development PROJECT: PLAT -000264-2024 DATE: December 27, 2024 The staff review indicates a request to review a Preliminary Plat application for the Richland Court Development. Richland Court is located north of County Road 78 (130t" Street West) and east of County Road 79 (Townline Avenue). This review should be considered preliminary, as more comments will follow with additional submittals. However, the Engineering Department offers the following comments at this time to the applicant and to the planning department: The following items need to be addressed/completed prior to the Preliminary Plat being approved: 1. Plan review and plat review redlined comments are attached to this memo and must be addressed and approved by the City Engineer. 2. Refer to Shakopee Public Utilities comments for watermain. 3. Conduct a title search to confirm other interests on the property. 4. Easements will be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They include, but are not limited to the following: • Verify appropriate drainage and utility easements for public sanitary sewer, storm sewer and watermain systems are provided. The minimum widths of drainage and utility easements are set forth in Section 10.1.A -D of the City of Shakopee Design Criteria. • Refer to plan review redlined comments for specific locations where additional easement is required. C:\Users\EASYPD-1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@FOOCD8A6\@BCL@FOOCD8A6.docx 1 of 3 34 5. A Wetland Mitigation Plan must be approved by the City as a condition of preliminary plat approval. 6. Approval of the preliminary plat does not constitute approval of the submitted construction plans. The following items need to be addressed/completed prior to release of the Final Plat for recording: 7. Execution of a Developer's Agreement, which needs to include provisions for a letter of credit or cash security equal to 125 percent of the estimated total cost of the improvements, plus 100 percent of the estimated costs of city inspection and administration. 8. Pay all applicable fees/charges listed below, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. • Street and Utility Fee • Watermain Fee • Trunk Storm Water Charge • Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge • Sign Installation Fee • Wetland Conservation Act Fees • Bituminous Sealcoat Fee • Storm Water Management Plan Review Fees 9. Submit a detailed contractor's bid for all public improvements associated with this subdivision. 10. Submit a detailed lot area drawing showing the total plat area, the total drainage and utility easement area encompassing 100 -year high water levels of wetlands/storm water basins, the total area of right-of-way, the total area of conservation easements and outlots, the total area of bituminous street and the total area of lots. 11. At a minimum, obtain conditional approval of the development's storm water management plan. 12. Prior to discharging into a storm water basin, pretreatment must be provided. 13. The maximum allowable sanitary sewer depth is thirty (30) feet. 14. Provide electronic files (AutoCAD and Portable Document Format — PDF) of the Final Plat to be recorded with datum on the Scott County coordinate system. The following items need to be addressed/completed prior to approval of a grading permit, a street and utility plan and/or a building permit: 15. Obtain final approval of the subdivision's storm water management plan. C:\Users\EASYPD' 1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@FOOCD8A6\@BCL@FOOCD8A6.docx 2 of 3 35 16. Pay all applicable fees and submit security for grading permit as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 17. Obtain a NPDES construction site permit prior to any land disturbing activity. A copy of the permit must be provided to the city. 18 Grade the entire site, as proposed on the approved plans, in one phase within one year from the date of approval of the grading permit application. Grading is defined as bringing the site to the proposed finished grade with materials deemed acceptable by the City of Shakopee engineering department, providing topsoil per City requirements and applying seed, mulch and/or sod per City requirements and providing an as -built record grading plan per Section 2.5 of the City of Shakopee Design Criteria. 19 Submit detailed pavement design calculations. 20 Submit a small utilities joint trench design and detail. 21 Submit a street lighting plan. 22 The contractor must submit a Construction Management Plan to the city prior to any construction activities. 23. The contractor must submit a signed copy of the supplemental conditions of the grading permit to the city prior to any grading activities. 24. Record plans need to be provided per the City of Shakopee Design Criteria, Section 2.5 and Section 11.2 (A -L). The record plans need to be certified and submitted to the engineering department. Provide a letter from the engineer of record certifying all improvements were constructed per approved plans and under the direct supervision of the engineer of record. Recommendation The Engineering Department recommends approval of the application subject to the conditions above being addressed/completed by the applicant. C:\Users\EASYPD' 1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@FOOCD8A6\@BCL@FOOCD8A6.docx 3 of 3 36 SCOTT COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION iScoti February 26, 2025 Mark Noble Senior Planner City of Shakopee 485 Gorman St. Shakopee, MN 55379 GOVERNMENT CENTER EAST, 200 FOURTH AVENUE WEST •SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 (952) 496-8346 • Fax: (952) 496-8365 • www.scottcountymn.gov SUBJECT: Richland Court Addition — PID 271650010 Dear Mark, We have reviewed the revised Richland Court Addition development plans, and we offer the following comments: • CH 79 is designated as a collector road. The proposed right of way dedication shown complies with the required 60 feet of the existing centerline of CH 79. Please note that CH 79 is shown incorrectly as a County State Aid Highway — please revise the plat to correct this error. • Construction of the right turn lane and bypass lane on CH 79 must follow the most recent road design plan. • No ponding, berming, signage, or landscaping shall be permitted in the County right of way • Any work within the County right of way shall require the issuance of a county permit before construction begins. Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposal. If you have any questions or need further information, please feel free to contact me at 962-496-8839 or tdill@co.scott.mn.ur. Sincerely, ijJr .2i41 + Terri Dill Principal Planner — Transportation Cc: Lisa Freese, Transportation Services Director Tony Winiecki, County Engineer Craig Jenson, Transportation Planning Manager Mark Callahan, Scott County Traffic Engineer Curt Anderson, Right of Way Administrator Alex Jordan, Shakopee City Engineer An Equal Opportunity/Safety Aware Employer 37 a N U RICHLAND HOMES - SHAKOPEE DEVELOPMENT RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT PLAN a) 0 � � .0 a) C 0 .w cn \. &,S1,30 :A NV -Id 133,11S-,-691-1,\,!1 g0 «uO1S \dol ,aa lad®©n e - u6yc - yy 81. 9a 39 40 12279 NicolletAve Burnsville, MN 55337 February 27, 2025 Dear Mr. Noble: 952.402.9209 fax 952.403.6803 main stonebrookeengineering.com Below are our responses to the City Comment Memo for Richland Court.. Our responses are in Red. 1. Plan review and plat review redlined comments are attached to this memo and must be addressed and approved by the City Engineer. The comments on the redlined planset have been addressed. 2. Refer to Shakopee Public Utilities comments for watermain. Comments have been address on the updated planset. 3. Conduct a title search to confirm other interests on the property. In Progress 4. Easements will be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They include, but are not limited to the following: Verify appropriate drainage and utility easements for public sanitary sewer, storm sewer and watermain systems are provided. The minimum widths of drainage and utility easements are set forth in Section 10.1.A -D of the City of Shakopee Design Criteria. Refer to plan review redlined comments for specific locations where additional easement is required. The only noted area where the easements were called out was on the west side of lot 10. The max sanitary depth along this is 13.22 feet. This would require an easement of 40', we are providing 50 feet here. 5. A Wetland Mitigation Plan must be approved by the City as a condition of preliminary plat approval. In Progress 6. Approval of the preliminary plat does not constitute approval of the submitted construction plans. Understood. 41 The following items need to be addressed/completed prior to release of the Final Plat for recording: 7. Execution of a Developer's Agreement, which needs to include provisions for a letter of credit or cash security equal to 125 percent of the estimated total cost of the improvements, plus 100 percent of the estimated costs of city inspection and administration. Understood. 8. Pay all applicable fees/charges listed below, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. Understood. • Street and Utility Fee • Watermain Fee • Trunk Storm Water Charge • Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge • Sign Installation Fee • Wetland Conservation Act Fees • Bituminous Sealcoat Fee • Storm Water Management Plan Review Fees 9. Submit a detailed contractor's bid for all public improvements associated with this subdivision. Will submit once a contractor is hired. 10. Submit a detailed lot area drawing showing the total plat area, the total drainage and utility easement area encompassing 100 -year high water levels of wetlands/storm water basins, the total area of right-of-way, the total area of conservation easements and outlots, the total area of bituminous street and the total area of lots. In progress, will be submitted with updated Stormwater Plan. 11. At a minimum, obtain conditional approval of the development's storm water management plan. We are waiting for Soil Data from Braun Intertec. We will re -submit stormwater plan as soon as this is received. 12. Prior to discharging into a storm water basin, pretreatment must be provided. Noted -Will be updated in revised Stormwater plan. 42 13. The maximum allowable sanitary sewer depth is thirty (30) feet. Understood. The max depth proposed is 13.22 feet. 14. Provide electronic files (AutoCAD and Portable Document Format — PDF) of the Final Plat to be recorded with datum on the Scott County coordinate system. This will be provided once completed. The following items need to be addressed/completed prior to approval of a grading permit, a street and utility plan and/or a building permit: 15. Obtain final approval of the subdivision's storm water management plan. Noted 16. Pay all applicable fees and submit security for grading permit as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. Understood. 17. Obtain a NPDES construction site permit prior to any land disturbing activity. A copy of the permit must be provided to the city. Contractor will submit this prior to starting work. 18. Grade the entire site, as proposed on the approved plans, in one phase within one year from the date of approval of the grading permit application. Grading is defined as bringing the site to the proposed finished grade with materials deemed acceptable by the City of Shakopee engineering department, providing topsoil per City requirements and applying seed, mulch and/or sod per City requirements and providing an as -built record grading plan per Section 2.5 of the City of Shakopee Design Criteria. Understood. 19. Submit detailed pavement design calculations. Included in Geotec report 20. Submit a small utilities joint trench design and detail. See sheet 30 of the updated planset. 21. Submit a street lighting plan. The lights are called out on sheet 31 of the planset. There is two proposed lights which at the locations discussed at the initial DRC meeting. 22. The contractor must submit a Construction Management Plan to the city prior to any construction activities. Contractor will submit once hired. 23. The contractor must submit a signed copy of the supplemental conditions of the grading permit to the city prior to any grading activities. Contractor will submit once hired. 24. Record plans need to be provided per the City of Shakopee Design Criteria, Section 2.5 and Section 11.2 (A -L). The record plans need to be certified and submitted to the 43 engineering department. Provide a letter from the engineer of record certifying all improvements were constructed per approved plans and under the direct supervision of the engineer of record. Understood. 44