Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
January 06, 2026 - Council Packet
SHAKOPEE Shakopee City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 6, 2026 7:00 PM City Hall, 485 Gorman Street Vision: Shakopee is a distinctive river town with a variety of business, cultural, and recreational opportunities in a safe, welcoming, and attractive environment. Our vision is for Shakopee to continue being the place people want to live, work, and play! Mission: Our mission is to deliver high quality services essential to maintaining a safe and sustainable community. We commit to doing this cost-effectively, with integrity and transparency. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Approval of Agenda 5. Consent Agenda These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these unless a council member or staff requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda for separate discussion & action. 5.a Designate individuals authorized to perform certain banking transactions. 5.b Purchase four John Deere front mowers; Two John Deere Gators; Three John Deere Tractors; Chevrolet Equinox; Chevrolet pickup truck. 5.c Ordinance O2026-001, Adopting the 2026 Fee Schedule 5.d Resolution R2026-007, Designating the City's Official Newspaper 5.e 2026 Tree Pruning Contract Extension 5.f Approve a Contract for the 2026 Ash Tree Removal Project 5.g Set Public Hearing Date for Street Reconstruction Plan 1 5.h Approve Change Order No. 3 for Canterbury Commons Internal Roadway Improvements 5.i Adopt Resolution of Support Dissolving the U.S. Hwy 169 Corridor Coalition 5.j Approve a Massage Business License for VIP Massage Inc. and a Massage Therapist License for Lyudmila Lelyukh. 5.k Approve a Massage Business License for Clinical Massage and Bodywork LLC. and a Massage Therapist license for Vienetta Lelyukh. 5.1 Approve a Cooperative Agreement with Scott County for the Construction and Maintenance of a Traffic Signal at the County Highway 16 and Dean Lakes Trail/Kinlock Way Intersection 5.m Resolution R2026-010, Extending City Issued THC Licenses 5.n Approval of the December 16, 2025 City Council Minutes 5.o Accept a Proposal from Stantec Consulting Services for Engineering Services for the Lions Park Parking Lot Improvements 5.p Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative's Operation Round Up Grant Award 5.q Approve Off Sale and Sunday Liquor Licenses for SM Liquor LLC. dba Merwin Liquor. 6. Public Comment Individuals may address the City Council about any item not on the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the center table, state their name and address for the clerk's record, and limit their remarks to three minutes. The City Council will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but may refer the matter to staff for a follow up report or direct that matter be scheduled on an upcoming agenda. 7. Business removed from consent agenda 8. Recess for Economic Development Authority Meeting 9. Reconvene 10. General Business 10.a Jackson Township Development Area (Alternative Urban Areawide Review) AUAR Update 11. Reports Liaison and Administration 2 11.a City Bill List 11.b News and Announcements 12. Other Business 13. Adjourn to January 20, 2026, at 7:00 pm 3 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.a January 6, 2026 Designate individuals authorized to perform certain banking transactions. Nate Reinhardt, Finance Director Action to be considered: Adopt Resolution R2026-001, a resolution designating individuals authorized to perform certain banking transactions. Motion Type: Adopt Background: It is recommended that the City Council on an annual basis authorize individuals to sign city checks and perform certain financial transactions and designate financial institutions to serve as depositories. This resolution does not change the current authorized positions who are designated to perform investing and banking transactions. Currently the Mayor and Finance Director sign all checks. While not legally required, it is considered a best practice to formally adopt a resolution of authorized individuals annually. Additionally, banks often require a formal action of the City Council recognizing the staff authorized to sign checks and authorize certain bank transactions. The attached resolution also identifies the authorized depositories for City funds. This includes banks and investment brokers the City works with on a regular basis as well as those that may become a depository during the fiscal year. All brokers must file an appropriate Broker Certification Form, a requirement of Minnesota Statutes, to transact business with the City of Shakopee. All documentation is reviewed by the City's auditors during the financial audit each year. The resolution will become effective with adoption. 4 Recommendation: Adopt Resolution R2026-001, a resolution designating individuals authorized to perform certain banking transactions. Budget Impact: N/A Attachments: Res. 2026-001 Annual Authorized Signer Resolution 1-6-2026.docx 5 RESOLUTION NO. R2026-001 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING INDIVIDUALS AUTHORIZED TO PERFORM CERTAIN BANK TRANSACTIONS WHEREAS, Old National Bank is designated as a depository of city funds; and WHEREAS, the following named institutions and brokers are hereby designated as additional depositories allowable for investment purposes; a. U.S. Bank; b. RBC Capital Markets, LLC; c. Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund (4M Fund); d. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc; e. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC; f. Moreton Capital Markets, LLC; WHEREAS, U.S. Bank Institutional Trust Services is hereby designated as the safekeeping depository for investment instruments in the City's investment portfolio and as clearinghouse for the City's investment portfolio transactions. WHEREAS, the city must designate individuals authorized to sign checks, transfer funds and approve transactions on behalf of the city; WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute Section 471.38 allows the use of electronic funds transfer, provided certain policy controls are in place, including that the governing body annually delegates the authority to the appropriate individual, for the following types of payments: a. for a claim for a payment from an imprest payroll bank account or investment of excess money; b. for a payment of tax or aid anticipation certificates; c. for a payment of contributions to pension or retirement fund; d. for vendor payments; and e. for payment of bond principal, bond interest and a fiscal agent service charge. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: that checks, drafts or other withdrawal orders issued against the funds of the city on deposit with said bank shall be signed by both Matt Lehman, Mayor and Nathan Reinhardt, Finance Director. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that William Reynolds, City Administrator, Nathan Reinhardt, Finance Director, Melissa Schlingman, Accounting Manager, Kimberly Weckman, Accounting 6 Clerk, are authorized to act for the City in all of its business activities including investments, payroll withholdings, electronic funds transfers, debt service payments and other banking transactions as deemed appropriate. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Christie Rossow, HR Director, Patti Kent, HR Specialist, and Jaime Nelson, HR Specialist are authorized to act for the City in banking transactions related to payroll including payroll withholdings and payments of payroll and related costs. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that effective January 1, 2026 this Resolution supersedes all prior and conflicting resolutions, including Resolution No. R2025-001. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this 6th day of January 2026. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk 7 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.b January 6, 2026 Purchase four John Deere front mowers; Two John Deere Gators; Three John Deere Tractors; Chevrolet Equinox; Chevrolet pickup truck. Bill Egan, Public Works Director Action to be considered: Approve the purchase of four John Deere mowers from Kibble Equipment, in the amount of $51,055.96; Two John Deere Gator's from Kibble Equipment, in the amount of $18,278.54; Three John Deere tractors from Kibble Equipment, in the amount of $139,604.00; Chevrolet Equinox from North Country GMC, and set up from North Central, in the total amount of $37,144.84; Pickup truck from Karl Automotive Group and Aspen Equipment, in the total amount of $68,286.77. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: The following equipment to be replaced and purchased are included in the 2026 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP): Facilities, Park and Community Center- Front Mower The replacement of four front mowers Nos. sk1453 (690 Hours), sk1452 (610 Hours), sk1454 (670 Hours), and sk1455 (590 Hours) are summarized in the attached CIP sheet Equip -26-181, Equip -26-465 and Equip -26-671. The front mowers are being purchased under contract number 24334 through Kibble Equipment. The quotation form is attached and is consistent with state contract pricing. The cost of four John Deere front mowers is $142,055.96 less the combined trade-ins to dealer of $91,000.00, leaving a difference of $51,055.96. The front mowers are used year round for mowing and snow removal. Existing cabs will be transferred to the new units. 8 Public Works - Park and Storm: John Deere Gators The replacement of two John Deere Gator Nos. sk1441 (847 hours) and sk1404 (364 hours) is summarized in the attached CIP sheet Equip -26-464 and Storm -26-004. The Gator's will be purchased under Sourcewell Contract No. 112624 through Kibble Equipment. The quotation form is attached and is consistent with cooperative contract pricing. The purchase amount with trade-in for the Gators is $18,278.54. Public Works - Park: John Deere Tractors & Equipment The replacement of three John Deere Tractor's Nos. sk1051 (1550 hours), sk1065 (1950 hours) and sk1066 (2600 hours) is summarized in the attached CIP sheet Equip -26-466. The tractors will be purchased under contract No. 244289 through Kibble Equipment. The quotation form is attached and is consistent with state contract pricing. The cost of three John Deere tractors is $275,604.00 less the combined trade-ins to dealer of $136,000.00, leaving a difference of $139,604.00. Police Department- Administrative: Equinox The replacment of a 2016 Chevrolet Equinox No. sk1040 (64,000 miles) is summarized in the attached CIP sheet Equip -26-312. The vehicle is being purchased under contract Nos. 260206 and 268611. The quoations from North Country GMC and North Central, are attached and is consistant with state contract pricing. The cost of the vehicle is $29,846.20, plus an additional $7,298.64 for equipment and install, with an overall total of $37,144.84. Public Works- Parks: Pickup Truck The replacment of a 2016 GMC pickup No. sk1069 (48,500 miles) is summarized in the attached CIP sheet Equip -26-463. The vehicle is being purchased under contract Nos. 258521 and 264954. The quotations from Karl Automotive Group and Aspen Equipment, are attached and is consistant with state contract pricing. The cost of the vehicle is $47,288.77 plus an additional $20,998.00 for equipment and install, with an overall total of $68,286.77. Once replaced, the vehicles will be further evaluated and rotated to replace other current holdover vehicles that are used for city purposes. The holdover vehicles that are to be replaced will then be declared surplus at a later date. Recommendation: Authorize the purchases. Budget Impact: 9 Table 1 below provides a summary of the costs and funding for the equipment purchases, comparing the actual amounts to the CIP budgeted amounts. All equipment is funded by the Equipment Internal Service and Surface Water funds. Revenues from the sales of surplus equipment will be deposited into the Equipment Internal Service Fund. Table 1. Equipment Cost and Funding Summary Equipment CIP Budget Actual Amount John Deere Front Mowers $ 60,000.00 $ 51,055.96 John Deere Gators I$ 22,000.00 $ 18,278.54 John Deere Tractors $274,500.00 $139,604.00 Administrative Vehicle $ 35,000.00 $ 37,144.84 Pickup Truck $ 73,500.00 $ 68,286.77 Total: $465,000.00 $314,370.11 Attachments: CIP Equip-26-181.pdf CIP Equip-26-465.pdf CIP Equip-26-671.pdf Shakopee 1570's 12-16-25.pdf CIP Equip-26-464.pdf CIP Storm-26-004.pdf Shakopee 845M Gators.pdf CIP 26-466.pdf Shakopee 5095M 12-23-25.pdf CIP sheet Equip-26-312.pdf Copy of Shakopee 2026 Equinox LT AWD.xlsx Quotient quote_ PSU- Shakopee PD- lnves...pdf CIP sheet Equip-26-463.pdf Truck Quote Karl Chev..pdf Aspen Quote.pdf 10 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Equip -26-181 Project Name Facilities: Front Mower Total Project Cost $54,600 Department Equipment Internal Serv. Fund Category Facilities Status Active Accounting Code 7800.1740 100018 2026 Replace Vehicle SK1453 Contact Public Works Director Type Equipment Priority 2 - Smart to do Useful Life 2 years Fund Capital Equipment Internal Service Fund 2028 Replace Vehicle Replace 2026 model and Cab SK1316 # # Description 2026: Replace 2024 John Deere Commercial Front Mount Mower SK1453. 2028: Replace 2026 John Deere Commercial Front Mount Mower. Watching for model change and needing new cabs. 2030: Replace 2028 John Deere Commercial Front Mount Mower. Winter use: city hall, library snow removal (Facilities- 6 months) Summer use: mowing parks and athletic fields (Public Works- Park Maintenance, 6 months) Justification 2 years. The 2 -year repurchase option provides a cost-effective solution by reducing overall maintenance expenses and downtime, while ensuring continuous warranty coverage throughout the service period. Expenditures Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings Total Funding Sources Equipment Internal Service Fund 2026 15,000 15,000 2027 0 0 2028 22,800 22,800 2029 0 0 2030 Total 16,800 54,600 16,800 54,600 Total 2026 15,000 15,000 2027 0 0 2028 22,800 22,800 2029 0 0 2030 Total 16,800 54,600 16,800 54,600 Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 89 11 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name Equip -26-465 Public Works Park: Front Mower Total Project Cost $109,200 Department Equipment Internal Serv. Fund Category Public Works- Park Status Active Accounting Code 7800.1740 100046 2026 Replace Vehicle SK1452 SK1454 Contact Public Works Director Type Equipment Priority 2 - Smart to do Useful Life 2 years Fund Capital Equipment Internal Service Fund 2028 Replace Vehicle Replace 2026 model and Cabs SK1229, SK1315 # # Description Used for mowing parks and athletic fields. 2026: Replace two 2024 John Deere Commercial Front Mount Mowers SK1452, SK1454 2028: Replace two 2026 John Deere Commercial Front Mount Mowers. Watching for model change and needing new cabs. 2030: Replace two 2028 John Deere Commercial Front Mount Mowers Justification 2 years. The 2 -year repurchase option provides a cost-effective solution by reducing overall maintenance expenses and downtime, while ensuring continuous warranty coverage throughout the service period. Expenditures Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings Tota I Funding Sources Equipment Internal Service Fund 2026 30,000 30,000 2027 0 0 2028 45,600 45,600 2029 0 0 2030 Total 33,600 109,200 33,600 109,200 Tota I 2026 30,000 30,000 2027 0 0 2028 45,600 45,600 2029 0 0 2030 Total 33,600 109,200 33,600 109,200 Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 102 12 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name Equip -26-671 Parks & Recreation: Front Mower Total Project Cost $54,600 Department Equipment Internal Serv. Fund Category Recreation Status Active Accounting Code 7800.1740 100067 2026 Replace Vehicle SK1455 Contact Public Works Director Type Equipment Priority 2 - Smart to do Useful Life 2 years Fund Capital Equipment Internal Service Fund 2028 Replace Vehicle Replace 2026 model and Cab SK1344 # # Description 2026: Replace 2024 John Deere Commercial Front Mower SK1455. 2028: Replace 2026 John Deere Commercial Front Mower. Watching for model change and needing new cabs. 2030: Replace 2028 John Deere Commercial Front Mower. Winter use: community center snow removal (Recreation, 6 months) Summer Use: mowing parks and athletic fields (Public Works - Park Maintenance, 6 months) Justification 2 years. The 2 -year repurchase option provides a cost-effective solution by reducing overall maintenance expenses and downtime, while ensuring continuous warranty coverage throughout the service period. Expenditures Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings Total Funding Sources Equipment Internal Service Fund 2026 15,000 15,000 2027 0 0 2028 22,800 22,800 2029 0 0 2030 Total 16,800 54,600 16,800 54,600 Total 2026 15,000 15,000 2027 0 0 2028 22,800 22,800 2029 0 0 2030 Total 16,800 54,600 16,800 54,600 Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 105 13 al JOHN DEERE Customer: Quotes are valid for 30 days from the creation date or upon contract expiration, whichever occurs first. A Purchase Order (PO) or Letter of Intent (LOI) including the below information is required to proceed with this sale. The PO or LOI will be returned if information is missing. Vendor: Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 Signature on all LOIs and POs with a signature line Contract name or number; or JD Quote ID LII Sold to street address LII Ship to street address (no PO box) n Bill to contact name and phone number ▪ Bill to address For any questions, please contact: Murphy Paul Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 Tel: 952-873-2224 Fax: 952-873-4227 Email: paul.murphy@kibbleeq.com n Bill to email address (required to send the invoice and/or to obtain the tax exemption certificate) Membership number if required by the contract Quotes of equipment offered through contracts between Deere & Company, its divisions and subsidiaries (collectively "Deere") and government agencies are subject to audit and access by Deere's Strategic Accounts Business Division to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the contracts. 14 JOHN DEERE Quote Id: 33605548 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com Prepared For: SHAKOPEE PUBLIC WORKS Delivering Dealer: Murphy Paul Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com Proposal For: Quote Prepared By: Murphy Paul paul.murphy@kibbleeq.com Date: 03 December 2025 Offer Expires: 15 February 2026 15 Confidential JOHN DEERE Quote Id: 33605548 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com 03 December 2025 485 GORMAN ST SHAKOPEE, P E E, MN 55379 Murphy Paul 952-873-2224 Kibble Equipment 16 Confidential el JOHN DEERE ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com Quote Summary Prepared For: SHAKOPEE PUBLIC WORKS 485 GORMAN ST SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 Business: 952-233-9557 Mobile: 952-367-7303 ACCOUNTSPAYABLE@SHAKOPEEMN.GOV Delivering Dealer: Kibble Equipment Murphy Paul 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 Phone: 952-873-2224 paul.murphy@kibbleeq.com Quote Id: 33605548 Created On: 03 December 2025 Last Modified On:16 December 2025 Expiration Date: 15 February 2026 Equipment Summary JOHN DEERE 1570 TerrainCutTM Commercial Front Mower (Less Mower Deck) Contract: MN Turf Maint Equip 243334 (PG 0B CG 22) Price Effective Date: November 1, 2024 JOHN DEERE 72 In. Fastback PRO Commercial Rear Discharge Deck Contract: MN Turf Maint Equip 243334 (PG 0B CG 22) Price Effective Date: November 1, 2024 Equipment Total Selling Price Qty $ 30, 562.12 X 4 = Extended $ 122,248.48 $ 4,951.87 X 4 = $ 19, 807.48 $ 142,055.96 Trade In Summary 2024 JOHN DEERE 1570 - 1 TC1570VVRR110071 PayOff Total Trade Allowance 2024 JOHN DEERE 1570 - 1 TC1570VLRR110073 PayOff Total Trade Allowance 2024 JOHN DEERE 1570 - 1 TC 1570VJ RR 110066 PayOff Total Trade Allowance Qty 1 1 1 Each $ 23, 000.00 $ 23, 500.00 $ 21, 000.00 Extended $ 23, 000.00 $ 0.00 $ 23, 000.00 $ 23, 500.00 $ 0.00 $ 23, 500.00 $ 21, 000.00 $ 0.00 $ 21, 000.00 Salesperson: X Accepted By: X 17 Confidential el JOHN DEERE ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com 2024 JOHN DEERE 1570 - 1 TC1570VCRR110067 PayOff Total Trade Allowance Trade In Total * Includes Fees and Non -contract items 1 $ 23, 500.00 Quote Summary Equipment Total Trade In SubTotal Est. Service Agreement Tax Total Down Payment Rental Applied Balance Due $ 23, 500.00 $ 0.00 $ 23, 500.00 $ 91,000.00 $ 142,055.96 $ (91, 000.00) $ 51,055.96 $ 0.00 $ 51, 055.96 (0.00) (0.00) $ 51,055.96 Salesperson: X Accepted By: X 18 Confidential JOHN DEERE Selling Equipment Quote Id: 33605548 Customer Name: SHAKOPEE PUBLIC WORKS ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com JOHN DEERE 1570 TerrainCutT"" Commercial Front Mower (Less Mower Deck) Contract: MN Turf Maint Equip 243334 (PG OB CG 22) Price Effective Date: November 1, 2024 Selling Price * $ 122, 248.48 * Price per item - includes Fees and Non -contract items Code Description 243BTC 1570 TerrainCutT"" Commercial Front Mower (Less Mower Deck) Qty List Price Discount% Discount Contract Extended Amount Price Contract Price 4 $ 34, 526.00 23.00 $ 7,940.98 $ 26, 585.02 $ 106, 340.08 Standard Options - Per Unit 001A United States and Canada 4 $ 0.00 183N JDLinkTM M Modem 4 $ 0.00 1019 23x10.50-12 4PR Turf Drive 4 $ 0.00 Tires 1191 Four Wheel Drive (Full Time or 4 $ 3,417.00 On Demand) 2012 Air Ride Suspension Seat with 4 $ 341.00 Armrests Standard Options Total $ 3,758.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 23.00 23.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 785.91 $ 78.43 $ 864.34 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 2,631.09 $ 262.57 $ 2,893.66 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 10, 524.36 $ 1,050.28 $ 11, 574.64 Dealer Attachments/Non-Contract/Open Market BTC1052 Double -Spool Auxiliary 9 Hydraulic Kit Dealer Attachments Total I Value Added Services Total 4 $ 1,407.06 $ 1,407.06 $ 0.00 23.00 $ 323.62 $ 1,083.44 $ 323.62 $ 1,083.44 $ 0.00 $ 4,333.76 $ 4,333.76 $ 0.00 Total Selling Price $ 39,691.06 $ 9,128.94 $ 30,562.12 $ 122,248.48 JOHN DEERE 72 In. Fastback PRO Commercial Rear Discharge Deck Contract: Price Effective Date: MN Turf Maint Equip 243334 (PG OB CG 22) November 1, 2024 Selling Price * $ 19, 807.48 * Price per item - includes Fees and Non -contract items Code Description Qty List Price Discount% Discount Contract Extended Confidential JOHN DEERE Selling Equipment Quote Id: 33605548 Customer Name: SHAKOPEE PUBLIC WORKS ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com 5500TC 72 In. Fastback PRO Commercial Rear Discharge Deck 4 $ 6,431.00 Amount Price Contract Price 23.00 $ 1,479.13 $ 4,951.87 $ 19, 807.48 Standard Options - Per Unit 001A United States and Canada 4 $ 0.00 Standard Options Total $ 0.00 22.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Value Added Services Total $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Total Selling Price $ 6,431.00 $ 1,479.13 $ 4,951.87 $ 19,807.48 Confidential 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Equip -26-464 Project Name Public Works Park - UTV Total Project Cost $35,000 Department Equipment Internal Serv. Fund Category Public Works- Park Status Active Accounting Code 7800.1740 100046 2026 Replace Vehicle SK1441 Contact Public Works Director Type Equipment Priority 2 - Smart to do Useful Life 2 years Fund Capital Equipment Internal Service Fund 2028 Replace Vehicle Replace 2026 model # # Description 2026: Replace 2024 John Deere Gator Utility Task Vehicle (UTV) SK1441. 2028: Replace 2026 John Deere Gator Utility Task Vehicle (UTV). 2030: Replace 2028 John Deere Gator Utility Task Vehicle (UTV). This UN is mostly used for watering plants in the downtown area and other areas in the city. Justification Replacement schedule: 2 year Expenditures Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 11,000 0 11,700 0 12,300 35,000 Tota I Funding Sources Equipment Internal Service Fund 11,000 0 11,700 0 12,300 35,000 Tota I 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 11,000 0 11,700 0 12,300 35,000 11,000 0 11,700 0 12,300 35,000 Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 101 21 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name Storm -26-004 Public Works Surface Water: UTV Total Project Cost $35,000 Department Storm Drainage Fund Category Vehicles Status Active Accounting Code 7300.1740 2026 Replace Vehicle SK1404 # Contact Public Works Director Type Equipment Priority 2 - Smart to do Useful Life 2 years Fund Surface Water Fund Description 2026: Replace 2022 John Deere Gator Utility Task Vehicle (UTV) SK1404. This UTV is mostly used for spraying herbicide to help control weeds in the storm ponds throughout the city. 2028: Replace 2026 John Deere Gator Utility Task Vehicle (UTV) 2030: Replace 2028 John Deere Gator Utility Task Vehicle (UTV) Justification Replacement schedule: 2 year Expenditures Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings Total Funding Sources - Storm Drainage Fund 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 11,000 0 11,700 0 12,300 35,000 11,000 0 11,700 0 12,300 35,000 Total 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 11,000 0 11,700 0 12,300 35,000 11,000 0 11,700 0 12,300 35,000 Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 235 22 al JOHN DEERE Customer: Quotes are valid for 30 days from the creation date or upon contract expiration, whichever occurs first. A Purchase Order (PO) or Letter of Intent (LOI) including the below information is required to proceed with this sale. The PO or LOI will be returned if information is missing. Vendor: Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 Signature on all LOIs and POs with a signature line Contract name or number; or JD Quote ID LII Sold to street address LII Ship to street address (no PO box) n Bill to contact name and phone number ▪ Bill to address For any questions, please contact: Murphy Paul Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plai ne, MN 56011 Tel: 952-873-2224 Fax: 952-873-4227 Email: paul.murphy@kibbleeq.com n Bill to email address (required to send the invoice and/or to obtain the tax n exemption certificate) Membership number if required by the contract Quotes of equipment offered through contracts between Deere & Company, its divisions and subsidiaries (collectively "Deere") and government agencies are subject to audit and access by Deere's Strategic Accounts Business Division to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the contracts. 23 JOHN DEERE Quote Id: 33606371 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com Prepared For: CITY OF SHAKOPEE CITY OF SHAKOPEE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC WORKS Proposal For: CITY OF SHAKOPEE CITY OF SHAKOPEE Delivering Dealer: Quote Prepared By: Murphy Paul Murphy Paul paul.murphy@kibbleeq.com Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com Date: 03 December 2025 Offer Expires: 30 January 2026 24 Confidential JOHN DEERE Quote Id: 33606371 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com 03 December 2025 CITY OF SHAKOPEE CITY OF SHAKOPEE 485 GORMAN ST SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 Murphy Paul 952-873-2224 Kibble Equipment 25 Confidential el JOHN DEERE ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com Quote Summary Prepared For: CITY OF SHAKOPEE CITY OF SHAKOPEE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF SHAKOPEE CITY OF SHAKOPEE 485 GORMAN ST SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 Delivering Dealer: Kibble Equipment Murphy Paul 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 Phone: 952-873-2224 paul.murphy@kibbleeq.com Quote Id: 33606371 Created On: 03 December 2025 Last Modified On:16 December 2025 Expiration Date: 30 January 2026 Equipment Summary JOHN DEERE GATORTM XUV 845M (Model Year 2026) Contract: Sourcewell Grounds Maint 112624-DAC (PG NB CG 70) Price Effective Date: December 2, 2025 Selling Price Qty Equipment Total $ 22,139.27 X Extended 2 = $ 44,278.54 $ 44,278.54 Trade In Summary 2022 JOHN DEERE XUV 835M - 1 M0835MAJNM052502 PayOff Total Trade Allowance 2024 JOHN DEERE XUV 835M - 1 M0835MAH RM071774 PayOff Total Trade Allowance Trade In Total * Includes Fees and Non -contract items Qty 1 1 Each $ 13, 000.00 $ 13, 000.00 Quote Summary Equipment Total Trade In SubTotal Est. Service Agreement Tax Total Down Payment Extended $ 13, 000.00 $ 0.00 $ 13, 000.00 $ 13, 000.00 $ 0.00 $ 13, 000.00 $ 26,000.00 $ 44,278.54 $ (26,000.00) $ 18,278.54 $ 0.00 $ 18,278.54 (0.00) Salesperson: X Accepted By: X 26 Confidential el JOHN DEERE ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com Rental Applied Balance Due (0.00) $ 18,278.54 Salesperson: X Accepted By: X 27 Confidential JOHN DEERE Selling Equipment Quote Id: 33606371 Customer Name: SHAKOPEE PUBLIC WORKS ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com JOHN DEERE GATORT"" XUV 845M (Model Year 2026) Contract: Price Effective Date: Sourcewell Grounds Maint 112624-DAC (PG NB CG 70) December 2, 2025 Selling Price * $ 44, 278.54 * Price per item - includes Fees and Non -contract items Code Description 8814M GATORTM XUV 845M (Model 2 $ 20,599.00 Year 2026) Qty List Price Discount% Discount Contract Extended Amount Price Contract Price 14.00 $ 2,883.86 $ 17, 715.14 $ 35,430.28 Standard Options - Per Unit 001F 182A 183B 0505 1060 1950 2350 2500 4000 4061 5006 5110 US 49 State Less AutoTracTM/GreenStarTM Harness Less JDLinkTM Hardware Build To Order 27" Predator Heavy -Duty all - terrain radial tires on 14" Yellow Steel Wheels Less Application Park Position in Transmission Green and Yellow OSR Nets Black Roof, Windshield, and Rear Panel Front Brush Guard Premium Comfort and Convenience Package Standard Options Total 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 200.00 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 2,400.00 2 $ 450.00 2 $ 1,600.00 $ 4,650.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 28.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 336.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 172.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 2,064.00 $ 63.00 $ 387.00 $ 224.00 $ 1,376.00 $ 651.00 $ 3,999.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 344.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 4,128.00 $ 774.00 $ 2,752.00 $ 7,998.00 Technology Options/Non-Contract/Open Market 1900 Less Display 1880 Less Receiver Technology Options Total 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 14.00 14.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 NW - Dealer Attachments/Non-Contract/Open Market BM26477 Rearview mirror 2 BUC1122Side mirrors - open station and 2 7 cab doors $ 255.73 $ 238.61 14.00 14.00 $ 35.80 $ 219.93 $ 33.41 $ 205.20 $ 439.86 $ 410.40 Confidential JOHN DEERE Selling Equipment Quote Id: 33606371 Customer Name: SHAKOPEE PUBLIC WORKS ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com Dealer Attachments Total $ 494.34 $ 69.21 $ 425.13 $ 850.26 Value Added Services Total $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Total Selling Price $ 25,743.34 $ 3,604.07 $ 22,139.27 $ 44,278.54 Confidential 29 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name Equip -26-466 Public Works Park: Tractor Total Project Cost $335,500 Department Equipment Internal Serv. Fund Category Public Works- Park Status Active Accounting Code 7800.1740 100046 2026 Replace Vehicle SK1051 SK1065 SK1066 and SK1301 SK1302 # Contact Public Works Director Type Equipment Priority 2 - Smart to do Useful Life 10 years Fund Capital Equipment Internal Service Fund Description Equipment and attachments being replaced Replace 2016 John Deere tractor SK# being Purchase replaced Price SK1051 $89,500 Plow attachment (goes with SK1051) 2016 John Deere tractor Plow attachment (goes with SK1065) SK1301 $22,000 SK1065 $89,500 SKI 302 $22,000 2016 John Deere tractor. *Upgrading to include front hitch and PTO due to the expanding trail system. SKI 066 $95,500 New blower attachment due to the expanding trail system (goes with SKI 066) NEW $17,000 Justification Replacement schedule: 10 years Expenditures Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings Total Funding Sources Equipment Internal Service Fund 2026 335,500 335,500 2027 2028 2029 2030 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Total 335,500 335,500 Total 2026 335,500 335,500 2027 2028 2029 2030 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Total 335,500 335,500 Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 103 30 al JOHN DEERE Customer: Quotes are valid for 30 days from the creation date or upon contract expiration, whichever occurs first. A Purchase Order (PO) or Letter of Intent (LOI) including the below information is required to proceed with this sale. The PO or LOI will be returned if information is missing. Vendor: Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 Signature on all LOIs and POs with a signature line Contract name or number; or JD Quote ID LII Sold to street address LII Ship to street address (no PO box) n Bill to contact name and phone number ▪ Bill to address For any questions, please contact: Murphy Paul Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plai ne, MN 56011 Tel: 952-873-2224 Fax: 952-873-4227 Email: paul.murphy@kibbleeq.com n Bill to email address (required to send the invoice and/or to obtain the tax n exemption certificate) Membership number if required by the contract Quotes of equipment offered through contracts between Deere & Company, its divisions and subsidiaries (collectively "Deere") and government agencies are subject to audit and access by Deere's Strategic Accounts Business Division to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the contracts. 31 JOHN DEERE Quote Id: 33604894 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com Prepared For: SHAKOPEE PUBLIC WORKS Delivering Dealer: Murphy Paul Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com Proposal For: Quote Prepared By: Murphy Paul paul.murphy@kibbleeq.com Date: 02 December 2025 Offer Expires: 28 February 2026 32 Confidential JOHN DEERE Quote Id: 33604894 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com 02 December 2025 485 GORMAN ST SHAKOPEE, P E E, MN 55379 Murphy Paul 952-873-2224 Kibble Equipment 33 Confidential al JOHN DEERE ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com Quote Summary Prepared For: SHAKOPEE PUBLIC WORKS 485 GORMAN ST SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 Business: 952-233-9557 Mobile: 952-367-7303 ACCOUNTSPAYABLE@SHAKOPEEMN.GOV Delivering Dealer: Kibble Equipment Murphy Paul 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 Phone: 952-873-2224 paul.murphy@kibbleeq.com Kibble would keep the new R1 tires that would comes with the new tractors and put on new turf tires. Quote Id: 33604894 Created On:02 December 2025 Last Modified On:23 December 2025 Expiration Date: 28 February 2026 Equipment Summary JOHN DEERE 5095M Utility Tractor $ 90,639.12 X Contract: MN Ag Tractors and OEM Attachments 244289 (PG 12 CG 22) Price Effective Date: February 1, 2025 JOHN DEERE 5095M Utility Tractor $ 85,325.76 X Contract: MN Ag Tractors and OEM Attachments 244289 (PG 12 CG 22) Price Effective Date: February 1, 2025 TIRES 16.9r30 turf tires $ 9,000.00 X Contract: MN Ag Tractors and OEM Attachments 244289 (PG 12 CG 22) Price Effective Date: Equipment Total Selling Price Qty Extended 2 = $ 181,278.24 1 = $ 85, 325.76 1 = $ 9,000.00 $ 275,604.00 Trade In Summary 2016 JOHN DEERE 5085M - 1 LV5085MJGG400281 PayOff Total Trade Allowance 2015 JOHN DEERE 5085M - 1 LV5085 M KFJ 744225 PayOff Total Trade Allowance 2016 JOHN DEERE 5085M - 1 LV5085MEGG400290 PayOff Qty Each 1 $ 41, 000.00 1 $ 46, 000.00 1 $ 49, 000.00 Extended $ 41, 000.00 $ 0.00 $ 41, 000.00 $ 46, 000.00 $ 0.00 $ 46, 000.00 $ 49, 000.00 $ 0.00 Salesperson: X Accepted By: X 34 Confidential el JOHN DEERE ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com Total Trade Allowance Trade In Total * Includes Fees and Non -contract items Quote Summary Equipment Total Trade In SubTotal Est. Service Agreement Tax Total Down Payment Rental Applied Balance Due $ 49, 000.00 $ 136,000.00 $ 275, 604.00 $ (136, 000.00) $ 139,604.00 $ 0.00 $ 139,604.00 (0.00) (0.00) $ 139,604.00 Salesperson: X Accepted By: X 35 Confidential JOHN DEERE Selling Equipment Quote Id: 33604894 Customer Name: SHAKOPEE PUBLIC WORKS ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com Contract: Price Effective Date: JOHN DEERE 5095M Utility Tractor MN Ag Tractors and OEM Attachments 244289 (PG 12 CG 22) February 1, 2025 Selling Price * $ 181,278.24 * Price per item - includes Fees and Non -contract items Code Description 19AGPY 5095M Utility Tractor Qty List Price Discount% Discount Contract Extended Amount Price Contract Price 2 $ 78,443.00 22.00 $ 17,257.46 $ 61,185.54 $ 122,371.08 Standard Options - Per Unit 182A 183N 0202 0409 0500 878B 1374 1799 1950 2060 2121 2400 2511 3025 3325 3430 3820 4001 4030 4110 4160 Less AutoTracTM/Less ISOBUS JDLinkTM Modem United States English Operators Manual Less Package Battery Disconnect Switch PowrQuad TM PLUS 16F/16R 40 km/h Transmission Less Loader Prep Package Less Application Premium Panorama Roof Cab Premium Air Suspension Seat Less Instructional Seat Mirror Telescopic LH & RH Corner Post Deluxe Exhaust 2 Mechanical Stackable Rear SCV 3 Stackable Mid SCVs with Mechanical Joystick Control Two Speed PTO - 540/540E Front Hitch Category 2 Electronic Hitch Control with Remote Control on LH Fender Telescoping Draft Links with Ball End - Category 2 LH Only Adjustment Lift Link 2 $ 0.00 21.00 $ 0.00 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 175.00 2 $ 5,752.00 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 17, 895.00 2 $ 1,720.00 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 388.00 2 $ 767.00 2 $ 0.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 22.00 22.00 21.00 21.00 22.00 22.00 21.00 22.00 22.00 21.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 38.50 $ 1,265.44 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 3,936.90 $ 378.40 $ 0.00 $ 85.36 $ 168.74 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 136.50 $ 4,486.56 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 13, 958.10 $ 1,341.60 $ 0.00 $ 302.64 $ 598.26 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 273.00 $ 8,973.12 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 27,916.20 $ 2,683.20 $ 0.00 $ 605.28 $ 1,196.52 $ 0.00 2 $ 984.00 22.00 $ 216.48 $ 767.52 $ 1,535.04 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 4,778.00 2 $ 604.00 21.00 22.00 22.00 $ 0.00 $ 1,051.16 $ 132.88 $ 0.00 $ 3,726.84 $ 471.12 2 $ 0.00 21.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 21.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 7,453.68 $ 942.24 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Confidential JOHN DEERE Selling Equipment Quote Id: 33604894 Customer Name: SHAKOPEE PUBLIC WORKS ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com 4210 4310 4420 5010 5090 5121 5999 6040 6111 8015 8300 8381 8727 8731 Mechanical Center Link with 2 $ 0.00 21.00 Ball Ends - Category 2 Basic Drawbar 2 LH & RH Stabilizer Bar 2 Flange Axle 2 Steel Rear Wheels 2 16.9-30 6PR R1 Bias 2 No Tire Brand Preference 2 MFWD Front Axle 2 11.2-24 10PR R1 Bias 2 Front Fenders - Turnable 2 Cold Weather package - 2 Coolant heater Front Power Take -Off Counter 2 Clockwise Rotating LED Beacon Light 2 $ 345.00 22.00 Full LED Lighting Package 2 $ 696.00 22.00 with Headlights Standard Options Total $ 37,761.00 $ 0.00 21.00 $ 0.00 21.00 $ 0.00 21.00 $ 0.00 21.00 $ -2,807.00 22.00 $ 0.00 21.00 $ 0.00 21.00 $ -1,541.00 22.00 $ 1,080.00 22.00 $ 113.00 22.00 $ 6,812.00 22.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ -617.54 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ -339.02 $ 237.60 $ 24.86 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ -2,189.46 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ -1,201.98 $ 842.40 $ 88.14 $ 1,498.64 $ 5,313.36 $ 75.90 $ 269.10 $ 153.12 $ 542.88 $ 8,307.42 $ 29,453.58 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ -4,378.92 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ -2,403.96 $ 1,684.80 $ 176.28 $ 10, 626.72 $ 538.20 $ 1,085.76 $ 58,907.16 Technology Options/Non-Contract/Open Market 1900 1880 Less Display Less Receiver Technology Options Total 2 $ 0.00 2 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 21.00 21.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Value Added Services Total $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Total Selling Price 116,204.00 $ 25,564.88 $ 90,639.12 $ 181,278.2 Contract: Price Effective Date: JOHN DEERE 5095M Utility Tractor MN Ag Tractors and OEM Attachments 244289 (PG 12 CG 22) February 1, 2025 Selling Price * $ 85, 325.76 * Price per item - includes Fees and Non -contract items Code Description 19AGPY 5095M Utility Tractor Qty List Price Discount% Discount Contract Extended Amount Price Contract Price 1 $ 78,443.00 22.00 $ 17,257.46 $ 61,185.54 $ 61,185.54 Confidential JOHN DEERE Selling Equipment Quote Id: 33604894 Customer Name: SHAKOPEE PUBLIC WORKS ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com Standard Options - Per Unit 182A 183N 0202 0409 0500 878B 1374 1799 1950 2060 2121 2400 2511 3025 3325 3430 3820 4001 4030 4110 4160 4210 4310 4420 5010 5090 5121 5999 6040 6111 8015 Less AutoTracTM/Less ISOBUS JDLinkTM Modem 1 $ 0.00 United States 1 $ 0.00 English Operators Manual 1 $ 0.00 Less Package 1 $ 0.00 Battery Disconnect Switch 1 $ 175.00 PowrQuad TM PLUS 16F/16R 1 $ 5,752.00 40 km/h Transmission Less Loader Prep Package 1 $ 0.00 Less Application 1 $ 0.00 Premium Panorama Roof Cab 1 $ 17,895.00 Premium Air Suspension Seat 1 $ 1,720.00 Less Instructional Seat 1 $ 0.00 Mirror Telescopic LH & RH 1 $ 388.00 Corner Post Deluxe Exhaust 1 $ 767.00 2 Mechanical Stackable Rear 1 $ 0.00 SCV 3 Stackable Mid SCVs with 1 Mechanical Joystick Control Two Speed PTO - 540/540E 1 Front Hitch Category 2 1 Electronic Hitch Control with 1 Remote Control on LH Fender Telescoping Draft Links with 1 Ball End - Category 2 LH Only Adjustment Lift Link 1 Mechanical Center Link with 1 Ball Ends - Category 2 Basic Drawbar LH & RH Stabilizer Bar Flange Axle Steel Rear Wheels 16.9-30 6PR R1 Bias No Tire Brand Preference MFWD Front Axle 11.2-24 10PR R1 Bias Front Fenders - Turnable 1 $ 0.00 $ 984.00 $ 0.00 $ 4,778.00 $ 604.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 22.00 22.00 21.00 21.00 22.00 22.00 21.00 22.00 22.00 21.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 38.50 $ 1,265.44 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 3,936.90 $ 378.40 $ 0.00 $ 85.36 $ 168.74 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 136.50 $ 4,486.56 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 13, 958.10 $ 1,341.60 $ 0.00 $ 302.64 $ 598.26 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 136.50 $ 4,486.56 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 13, 958.10 $ 1,341.60 $ 0.00 $ 302.64 $ 598.26 $ 0.00 22.00 $ 216.48 $ 767.52 $ 767.52 21.00 22.00 22.00 $ 0.00 21.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1 $ 0.00 1 $ 0.00 1 $ 0.00 1 $ 0.00 1 $ -2,807.00 1 $ 0.00 1 $ 0.00 1 $ -1,541.00 1 $ 1,080.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 22.00 21.00 21.00 22.00 22.00 $ 0.00 $ 1,051.16 $ 132.88 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ -617.54 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ -339.02 $ 237.60 $ 0.00 $ 3,726.84 $ 471.12 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ -2,189.46 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ -1,201.98 $ 842.40 $ 0.00 $ 3,726.84 $ 471.12 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ -2,189.46 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ -1,201.98 $ 842.40 Confidential JOHN DEERE Selling Equipment Quote Id: 33604894 Customer Name: SHAKOPEE PUBLIC WORKS ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE MADE OUT TO (VENDOR): Deere & Company 2000 John Deere Run Cary, NC 27513 FED ID: 36-2382580 UEID: FNSWEDARMK53 ALL PURCHASE ORDERS MUST BE SENT TO DELIVERING DEALER: Kibble Equipment 1051 Old Hwy 169 Blvd Belle Plaine, MN 56011 952-873-2224 internetsales@kibbleeq.com 8300 8727 8731 Cold Weather package - Coolant heater LED Beacon Light Full LED Lighting Package with Headlights Standard Options Total 1 $ 113.00 1 $ 345.00 1 $ 696.00 $ 30,949.00 22.00 $ 24.86 $ 88.14 22.00 $ 75.90 $ 269.10 22.00 $ 153.12 $ 542.88 $ 6,808.78 $ 24,140.22 $ 88.14 $ 269.10 $ 542.88 $ 24,140.22 Technology Options/Non-Contract/Open Market 1900 1880 Less Display Less Receiver Technology Options Total 1 $ 0.00 1 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 21.00 21.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 A_ Value Added Services Total $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Total Selling Price 109, 392.00 $ 24,066.24 $ 85,325.76 $ 85,325.76 Hours: Contract: TIRES 16.9r30 turf tires 0 MN Ag Tractors and OEM Attachments 244289 (PG 12 CG 22) Selling Price * $ 9,000.00 * Price per item - includes Fees and Non -contract items Code Description Qty List Price Discount% coop t ire 16.9-30 rear tires, 11.2-24 1 $ 9,000.00 front tires 0.00 Discount Contract Extended Amount Price Contract Price $ 0.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 Total Selling Price $ 9,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 Confidential 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name Equip -26-312 Police: Unmarked Administrative Total Project Cost $71,000 Department Equipment Internal Serv. Fund Category Police Status Active Accounting Code 7800.1740 100031 2026 Replace Vehicle SK1040 Contact Public Works Director Type Equipment Priority 2 - Smart to do Useful Life 10 years Fund Capital Equipment Internal Service Fund 2027 Replace Vehicle SK1012 # # Description 2026 replace one vehicle: SK1040, a 2016 Chevrolet Equinox. 2027 replace one vehicle SK1012, a 2017 Jeep Cherokee. Justification Replacement schedule: 10 years. Expenditures Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings Tota I Funding Sources Equipment Internal Service Fund 2026 2027 35,000 36,000 35,000 36,000 2028 2029 2030 0 0 0 O 0 0 Total 71,000 71,000 Tota I 2026 2027 35,000 36,000 35,000 36,000 2028 2029 2030 0 0 0 O 0 0 Total 71,000 71,000 Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 91 40 MN CONTRACT # 260206 90 - 120 ARO NORTH COUNTRY GM 1502 E HOWARD ST HIBBING, MN 55746 218-263-7576 fax 800-894-7579 ITEM # CONTACT PERSON FLEET MGR BOB O'HARA 218-349-8955 CRSU5 BASE MODEL 2026 CHEVROLET EQUINOX LT 1PR26 $ 28,079.40 option cost AWD STD 1.5L TURBO ENGINE X LSD STD STD 8 SPEED AUTO X MGH STD 88.00 BLOCK HEATER K05 - 954.80 Safety and Technology Package includes (DRZ) Rear Camera Mirror, (T3U) front fog lamps, (UKK) Rear Pedestrian Alert, (UV2HD Surround Vision and (UVX) Traffic Sign Recognition. X CWN $954.80 1,938.00 Convenience Package II Includes (A2X) 8 -way power driver seat adjuster, (AL9) 2 -way power driver seat adjuster, (ASV) cabin humidity and windshield sensor, (CE1) Rainsense intermittent front wipers, (CJ2) dual -zone automatic climate control, (CMO) Heated Wiper Park, (K4C) Wireless Charging, (TCP) AutoSense, hands - free power programmable liftgate, (UG1) Universal Home Remote, (VK8) sunglass holder and (V2P) roof rails(Also includes Evotex seating in (H9F) Black or (ENY) Artemis Gray.Beginning with start of production, certain vehicles will be forced to include (R6I) Universal Home Remote Non-functional, which removes Universal Home Remote. See dealer for details or the window label for the features on a specific vehicle.) ZQ3 - 286.00 LPO, Floor Liner Package Includes (RIA) All-weather floor liners, LPO, (RIS) Second Row All-weather mat, LPO and (VLI) Cargo mat, LPO.(Not available with (CAV) Integrated cargo liner, LPO or (VAV) All-weather floor mats. LPO.) PDK - 41 154.00 CARGO PACKAGE Includes Cargo Shade and Cargo Net. VRS - 220.00 FLOOR LINER PKG (n/a at start of production) X RIA $220.00 STD DEEP TINTED GLASS x AKO STD DEALER OPTIONS QTY - 286.00 EXTRA KEYS/FOB 2 DLR1 $572.00 N/C MOSAIC BLACK METALLIC X GB8 N/C 435.6 RADIANT RED MET GNT - N/C STERLING GRAY GXO - N/C CACTI GREEN GVR - N/C LAKESHORE BLUE METALLIC GXP - N/C WHITE GAZ STD PAINT BLACK CLOTH EKV INCL $ 29,826.20 0.06875 MN STATE SALES TAX @6.875 - 349.25 TAX EXCEMPT PLATES TITLE & TRANS - 20.00 TRANSIT TAX X $20.00 $ 29,846.20 contact name customer address city, ST zip phone # email address JOHN TIETZ CITY OF SHKOPEE PO # FACTORY ORDER NUMBER 42 QUOTE NUMBER 28293 DATE December 4, 2025 EXPIRY DATE January 3, 2026 at 2:00 PM Download PDF la NORTH (ENTRAL FROM Chris Wallberg North Central Upfitting 25112 22nd Ave, St Cloud 4821 Mustang Circle, Mounds View www.northcentralinc.com PHONE (320) 251 7252 FOR Shakopee Police TO Nick Bengtson PSU- Shakopee PD- Investigator Build- 2026 Equinox- Admin PRICING REFLECTS L-366(5) STATE CONTRAT Services to include pickup and delivery of old and new vehicle to the department. Warranty on installation of equipment as long as customer owns the vehicle. Warranty may be voided in part or in whole at the sole discretion of the original installer, if any unauthorized modifications or damages occur. Manufacture warranty will be followed on all other products. ALL WHELEN WCX ITEMS 10 YEAR WARRANTY DISCRETE VEHICLE THIS WILL BE A SPECIALIZED HIGHLY DISCRETE VEHICLE. ALL LIGHTS MUST REMAIN AS HIDDEN AS POSSIBLE, TINT ANY EXTERNAL LIGHTS THAT NEED TO BE. WHEC399-5 WHELEN CORE WITH CCTL5 HANDHELD CONTROLLER, SA315U SPEAKER, SAKI SPEAKER BRACKET, SCANPORT FOR VEHICLE INTERFACE C399 CORE, CCTL5 HANDHELD CONTROL HEAD, SA315U SPEAKER, C399SP, SAKI AP b au 11, 91210 .mO 0.0 • 1,248.33 x1 1,248.33 WHEAVW22DD WHELEN AVENGER DASH LIGHT RED/WHITE TO BE MOUNTED ON DRIVERS SIDE WINDSHIELD UP HIGH FUNCTIONS AS WARNING AND TAKEDOWN/SCENE 281.88 x1 281.88 43 WHEAVW22EE WHELEN AVENGER DASH LIGHT BLUE/WHITE 281.88 x 1 281.88 TO BE MOUNTED ON DRIVERS SIDE WINDSHIELD UP HIGH FUNCTIONS AS WARNING AND TAKEDOWN/SCENE 41.,, ir - A A %pUI bN.wd AVBKT5D 19.72 WHELEN DUAL AVENGER HEADLINER BRACKET x 2 39.44 WHEXI2D 127.00 WHELEN ION DUO RED/WHITE- SMOKED x 2 254.00 TO BE USED IN GRILLE AND REAR SIDE WINDOW FUNCTIONS AS WARNING AND SCENE/ALLEY/TAKEDOWN WHEXI2E 127.00 WHELEN ION DUO BLUE/WHITE- SMOKED x 2 254.00 TO BE USED IN GRILLE AND REAR SIDE WINDOW FUNCTIONS AS WARNING AND SCENE/ALLEY/TAKEDOWN WHEIONR 103.24 WHELEN ION RED x 1 103.24 TO BE INSTALLED IN REAR WINDOW UP HIGH FUNCTIONS AS WARNING WHEIONB 103.24 WHELEN ION BLUE x 1 103.24 TO BE INSTALLED IN REAR WINDOW UP HIGH FUNCTIONS AS WARNING 44 WHEVX3RBCX WHELEN VXE TRIO- RED/BLUE/WHITE SMOKED 102.66 x 4 410.64 TO GO ON THE FRONT BUMPER CORNER, AND REAR BUMPER COVER FUNCTIONS AS WARNING AND SCENE/REVERSE SOUETHFSS-SP-ISO 67.35 SOUNDOFF ISOLATED HEADLIGHT FLASHER x 1 67.35 TO FLASH OEM FOG LIGHTS (MAY NOT WORK ON CIVILIAN VEHICLE) t ) SOUETFBSSN-P 58.78 SOUNDOFF SOLID STATE TAILLIGHT FLASHER, 12 WIRE -ISOLATED POSITIVE x 1 OUTPUTS. 58.78 TO FLASH BRAKE AND REVERSE LIGHTS r ABL20.1850 275.52 OPTICOM TUBE WITH HOUSING x 1 275.52 TO BE MOUNTED IN THE GRILLE- HIDDEN O ABL20.1870PE 491.35 OPTICOM POWER SUPPLY x 1 491.35 POWER SUPPLY FOR OPTICOM EMITTER MAGMMSU-1 36.99 MAGNETIC MIC CLIP x 1 FOR HANDHELD CONTROLLER/PA 36.99 MAGNETic C PSU TYPE A BUILD 2,750.00 INSTALLATION OF ALL EQUIPMENT INTO NEW VEHICLE x 1 2,750.00 SHOP SUPPLIES 250.00 SHOP SUPPLIES x 1 250.00 45 Wiring Supply Needs Wiring Supply Needs 232.00 x1 232.00 75Amp Relay WAY75678-2 6 Panel-WAY82025-2 12 Panel WAY82024-1 100 Amp BreakerWAY48885-1 Core Fuse Block WAY46096-1 USB WAY11019-1 9999 Sublet Services- WINDOW TINT TINT FRONT TWO WINDOWS 20% TO MATCH FACTORY TINT WINDSHIELD EYEBROW 20% TO HIDE VISOR LIGHTS 160.00 x1 160.00 210002- Quality Control Inspection x 1 QCI Questions & Answers PSU- Shakopee PD- Investigator Build- 2026 Equinox- Admin PRICING REFLECTS L-366(5) STATE CONTRAT Total 7,298.64 Additional Comments Optional Subtotal Total 7,298.64 7,298.64 Your order/reference number Optional Yes, I Nick Bengtson agree to and accept this quote, on December 5, 2025 at 6:53 AM. Decline this quote... Powered by Quotient 46 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name Equip -26-463 Public Works Park: 1-Ton(class 3) Pickup with plow Total Project Cost $73,500 Department Equipment Internal Serv. Fund Category Public Works- Park Status Active Accounting Code 7800.1740 100046 2026 Replace Vehicle SK1069 # Contact Public Works Director Type Equipment Priority 2 - Smart to do Useful Life 10 years Fund Capital Equipment Internal Service Fund Description Replace SK1069 2016 1 -Ton (class 3) GMC 2500 pickup with plow and power tailgate. Justification Replacement schedule: 10 years Expenditures Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings Total Funding Sources Equipment Internal Service Fund 2026 73,500 73,500 2027 2028 2029 2030 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Total 73,500 73,500 Total 2026 73,500 73,500 2027 2028 2029 2030 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Total 73,500 73,500 Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 100 47 KARL AUTOMOTIVE GROUP JACOB MADSEN I 5156453634 I J.MADSEN@KARLCHEVROLET.COM Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD (CK30903) 4WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck KARL AUTO GROUP is proud to be your #1 Government Chevrolet Vehicle Dealer in Iowa for several years in a row. We are the only Government Dealer in Iowa to provide you a full time staff dedicated solely to government entities and their needs. We can assist you with all of your vehicle needs to include "turn -key" solutions and custom upfitting, saving you time and money with our own Karl Emergency Vehicles. Thank you for the opportunity to earn your business. 48 KARL AUTOMOTIVE GROUP JACOB MADSEN I 5156453634 I J.MADSEN@KARLCHEVROLET.COM KARL AUTOMOTIVE GROUP Dealership Information KARL AUTO GROUP JACOB MADSEN 515-645-3634 J.MADSEN@KARLCHEVROLET.COM Prepared By: JACOB MADSEN KARL AUTOMOTIVE GROUP 5156453634 J.MADSEN@KARLCHEVROLET.COM C At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available. This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 27179. Data Updated: Dec 1, 2025 6:46:00 PM PST. Dec 8, 2025 Pac 49 KARL AUTOMOTIVE GROUP JACOB MADSEN I 5156453634 I J.MADSEN@KARLCHEVROLET.COM Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD (CK30903) 4WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck ( Complete ) Price Summary PRICE SUMMARY Base Price Total Options Vehicle Subtotal Dealer Advertising Adjustment Destination Charge Grand Total Invoice Invoice $46,921.60 $46,921.60 $1,645.28 $1,645.28 $48,566.88 $48,566.88 $0.00 $0.00 $2,595.00 $2,595.00 $51,161.88 $51,161.88 C At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available. This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 27179. Data Updated: Dec 1, 2025 6:46:00 PM PST. Dec 8, 2025 Pac 50 KARL AUTOMOTIVE GROUP JACOB MADSEN I 5156453634 I J.MADSEN@KARLCHEVROLET.COM Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD (CK30903) 4WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck ( Complete ) Quote Worksheet Base Price Dest Charge Total Options Subtotal GOV DISCOUNT UPFITTER Subtotal Pre -Tax Adjustments MSRP I $49,600.00 $2,595.00 $1,808.00 $54,003.00 ($2,900.00) $395.00 ($2,505.00) Less Customer Discount Subtotal Discount Trade -In ($4,209.23) ($4,209.23) $0.00 Excluded from Sales Tax Subtotal Trade -In $0.00 Taxable Price $47,288.77 Sales Tax $0.00 Subtotal Taxes Subtotal Post -Tax Adjustments Total Sales Price $0.00 $0.00 $47,288.77 Dealer Signature / Date Customer Signature / Date O At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available. This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 27179. Data Updated: Dec 1, 2025 6:46:00 PM PST. Dec 8, 2025 Pac51 KARL AUTOMOTIVE GROUP JACOB MADSEN I 5156453634 I J.MADSEN@KARLCHEVROLET.COM Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD (CK30903) 4WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck ( Complete ) Window Sticker SUMMARY [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD (CK30903) 4WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck MSRP:$49,600.00 Interior:Jet Black, Vinyl seat trim Exterior 1:Lakeshore Blue Metallic Exterior 2:No color has been selected. Engine, 6.6L V8 with Direct Injection and Variable Valve Timing, gasoline Transmission, 10 -speed automatic OPTIONS CODE CK30903 1WT 8S3 9L7 AZ3 CGN E63 FE9 GT4 GXP H2G IOR JFP K05 KW5 MODEL MSRP [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD (CK30903) 4WD Reg Cab $49,600.00 142" Work Truck OPTIONS Work Truck Preferred Equipment Group $0.00 Backup alarm, 97 decibels $138.00 Upfitter switch kit, (5) $150.00 Seats, front 40/20/40 split -bench $0.00 Chevytec spray -on bedliner $545.00 Durabed, pickup bed $0.00 Emissions, Federal requirements $0.00 Rear axle, 3.73 ratio $0.00 Lakeshore Blue Metallic $0.00 Jet Black, Vinyl seat trim $0.00 Audio system, Chevrolet Infotainment 3 system, 7" diagonal HD color $0.00 touchscreen, AM/FM stereo GVWR, 11,300 lbs. (5126 kg) with single rear wheels Engine block heater Alternator, 220 amps Inc. L8T Engine, 6.6L V8 with Direct Injection and Variable Valve Timing gasoline , $0.00 $100.00 $0.00 O At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available. This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 27179. Data Updated: Dec 1, 2025 6:46:00 PM PST. Dec 8, 2025 Pac 52 KARL AUTOMOTIVE GROUP JACOB MADSEN I 5156453634 I J.MADSEN@KARLCHEVROLET.COM Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD (CK30903) 4WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck ( Complete ) MKM NZZ PYT QF6 SRW VQO VYU ZYG Transmission, 10 -speed automatic Skid Plates Wheels, 18" (45.7 cm) painted steel Tires, LT275/70R18E all -terrain, blackwall Single Rear Wheels LPO, Black work step Snow Plow Prep/Camper Package Tire, spare LT275/70R18 all -terrain, blackwall Inc. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $575.00 $300.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Adjustments Total Destination Charge TOTAL PRICE $51,408.00 $0.00 $2,595.00 $54,003.00 FUEL ECONOMY Est City: N/A Est Highway:N/A hway: N/A Est Highway Cruising Range:N/A C At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available. This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 27179. Data Updated: Dec 1, 2025 6:46:00 PM PST. Dec 8, 2025 Pac 53 /&QIIIFMENT ASPEN ASPE/Y Adivision of MGX Equipment Services, LLC CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS: 9150 Pillsbury Avenue South, Bloomington, MN 55420-3686 - Phone: (952) 888-2525 • Fax: (952) 656-7159 • Website: www.aspenequipment.com Cust Name: Contact: Phone: Fax: Works John Tietz 952-233-9557 Configuration #: EQT007188_v1 Proposal Date: 12/9/2025 Aspen Equipment, LLC. is pleased to offer the following proposal for your consideration Part/Spec Number Description 3.136 UTWO810GEN2 Western 8'-10' Wide Out plow Gen 2, Ultramount 2 Blade height 31" on Moldboard, 35" at ends Blade gauge is 14 GA steel Four (4) trip springs Six (6) vertical ribs Pivot bar Power bar provides torsional strength Lift ram is 1-3/4" x 8" Angling rams are 1-1/2" x 10" Plow width at full angle: 7'2" Retracted Plow width at full angle: 9' Expanded Plow width at full angle: 7'11" Scoop Approximate weight of plow is 1,0201bs. 1/2" x 6" high carbon steel cutting edge 1/2" x 8" high carbon cutting edge on wings Disc Shoes are optional Poly blade guides 3.209 72525 3.170 52280-1 3.210 78490 5.105 G2-60-1342 EA38 5.314 Liftgate Install -Pickup 5.272 NA 5.294 NA 5.295 NA 8.3 Backup Camera 8.5 Backup Sensors 7.5025 11906-52-01 7.5028 11920-52-01 8.272 R1 LPPA 8.217 Strobe Installation EA 8.221 Wire Hot Important Note: Adder for NIGHTHAWK LED Headlight Kit, Complete Western Wide -Out Deflector Kit Adder for GM Supplemental Harness Kit Tommygate 38" Ext Alum Platform w/ taper, 1300 lb cap, G2 Series Installation of liftgate on pickup. Mount, wire and test Tommygate "Hot dipped" Galvanize framework Tommygate Rear camera & sensor bar Tommygate Side sensor relocation kit FMVSS 111 - Relocate factory installed backup camera system Relocate factory installed backup sensor system Weatherguard Hex Aluminum Headache Rack Weatherguard Center Light Bracket Whelen 15" Low Profile CON3 Amber Strobe Bar, Permanent Mount, Class 1 Mount strobe, route wire to switch, tie-up and guard. Wire Strobes Hot Truck rating and compatibilty MUST be verified prior to plow installation State of Minnesota Contract 264954, 229754 Price $9,519.00 $577.00 $585.00 $119.00 $3,894.00 $1,353.00 $860.00 $105.00 $370.00 $578.00 $578.00 $1,182.00 $228.00 $472.00 $413.00 $165.00 Continued On Next Page Submitted by, Mitch Buzzo 952-656-7133 * Equipment Specifications subject to change. ** Manufacture's Surcharges may be added to this proposal. *** Chassis modifications including, but not limited to alterations or relocation of components related to fuel tanks, air tanks, brakes, exhaust systems, battery boxes, protrusions above and below the frame rails, shortening or lengthening frame rails and the like will be added to the selling price. Exhaust Systems: With the new EPA mandated diesel exhaust systems for 2007 and newer many changes are taking place. Manufacturers are often unable to depict accurately how the exhaust systems are configured and have difficulty stipulating whether certain components (I.e. PTOs and pumps) may fit in the confined spaces beneath the truck. 2007 EPA COMPLIANT DIESEL EXHAUST SYSTEMS CANNOT BE MODIFIED, RELOCATED OR REPLACED BY ASPEN EQUIPMENT, LLC. Due to evolving designs, Aspen Equipment, LLC. can not maintain expertise on every chassis/engine/transmission/exhaust configuration possible, regardless of who orders or specifies it. Nor can Aspen Equipment, LLC. guarantee that a chassis ordered today will not change in design prior to delivery from the factory. Therefore, Aspen Equipment, LLC. does not warrant that proposed products can be installed on a chassis without modifications to the chassis or products installed. As such, Aspen Equipment, LLC. will not be responsible for the cost of modifications due to exhaust systems conflicting with the installation of proposed products. Aspen Equipment, LLC. will make every reasonable effort to ensure that installations are completed without additional charges to the customer. 54 1 of 2 ��/ASPEN IV Aclivisivrr of MGX EquiprnenE'Servi,e*, LLC CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS: 9150 Pillsbury Avenue South, Bloomington, MN 55420-3686 - Phone: (952)888-2525 • Fax: (952)656-7157 • Website: www.aspenequipment.com Cust Name: Works Contact: John Tietz Phone: 952-233-9557 Fax: Configuration #: EQT007188_v1 Proposal Date: 12/9/2025 Aspen Equipment, LLC. is pleased to offer the following proposal for your consideration Qty Part/Spec Number Description Tax Note: Applicable sales tax and/or FET estimates will be confirmed and added to the final invoice Price Submitted by, Mitch Buzzo 952-656-7133 Budgetary Sub Total: Does not include Applicable Taxes Budgetary Total: $20,998.00 $20,998.00 * Equipment Specifications subject to change. ** Manufacture's Surcharges may be added to this proposal. *** Chassis modifications including, but not limited to alterations or relocation of components related to fuel tanks, air tanks, brakes, exhaust systems, battery boxes, protrusions above and below the frame rails, shortening or lengthening frame rails and the like will be added to the selling price. Exhaust Systems: With the new EPA mandated diesel exhaust systems for 2007 and newer many changes are taking place. Manufacturers are often unable to depict accurately how the exhaust systems are configured and have difficulty stipulating whether certain components (I.e. PTOs and pumps) may fit in the confined spaces beneath the truck. 2007 EPA COMPLIANT DIESEL EXHAUST SYSTEMS CANNOT BE MODIFIED, RELOCATED OR REPLACED BY ASPEN EQUIPMENT, LLC. Due to evolving designs, Aspen Equipment, LLC. can not maintain expertise on every chassis/engine/transmission/exhaust configuration possible, regardless of who orders or specifies it. Nor can Aspen Equipment, LLC. guarantee that a chassis ordered today will not change in design prior to delivery from the factory. Therefore, Aspen Equipment, LLC. does not warrant that proposed products can be installed on a chassis without modifications to the chassis or products installed. As such, Aspen Equipment, LLC. will not be responsible for the cost of modifications due to exhaust systems conflicting with the installation of proposed products. Aspen Equipment, LLC. will make every reasonable effort to ensure that installations are completed without additional charges to the customer. 55 2 of 2 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.c January 6, 2026 Ordinance O2026-001, Adopting the 2026 Fee Schedule Rick Parsons Action to be considered: Approve Ordinance O2026-001, adopting the 2026 fee schedule setting fees and charges for the City of Shakopee Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: Staff has reviewed city fees for 2026 and is proposing the changes outlined in the attached redline version of the 2026 fee schedule. The following is a summary of the proposed changes. This is not an all-inclusive list; specific changes not noted below can be seen in the redlined copy attached. Public Works • Equipment services charges will be increased aligning with the Construction Cost Index (CCI) of 3.4%. Engineering Private Development Fees • Most Engineering Private Development Fees are increasing to align with the Construction Cost Index (CCI) of 3.4%. • The City SAC fee is set based on the 2021 rate study. • Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) application categories created and assigned fees. General Engineering Fees • Most General Engineering Fees are increasing to align with the Construction Cost Index (CCI) of 3.4% • New Right -of -Way permit fee trench/directional drilling category and fee added. Sanitary Sewer/Storm Water Sanitary Sewer/Storm Water rates will see small increases primarily due to inflationary increases in operational costs. For Sanitary Sewer the average home utilizing 5,000 gallons of water per month, the increase will amount to $0.90 per month. For Storm Water the monthly charge will increase by $.05 per month. 56 Planning Fees • Plat fees and land dedication fees are increasing. • Electrical permit fees are increasing. • Home dog boarding for daycare has been assigned an annual fee. • Short Term Rental Licensing has been assigned fees. • A Health Division section was created. O Fee structures have been created and fees assigned for food establishments and hotel licensing. Fire Department: • Hotel Inspection fees have been added. Parks and Recreation: There were many changes to the fee structures and fee amounts for the Parks and Recreation Department. These changes are based off of the Comprehensive Revenue Policy (CRP) presented to City Council on August 19, 2025. • Membership fees have been increased and the membership structure modified. • Gymnasium fees and Ice Arena fees have increased. • Ice Arena Advertising fees have been established. • Outdoor Athletic Facility Fees have been established. • Special Event fees have been restructured. Recommendation: After review, approve the above requested motion. Budget Impact: This ordinance will set the fees collected for 2026. Attachments: Ordinance O2026-001, Approving 2026 Fee Schedule 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule (Redlined) 57 ORDINANCE NO. O2026-001 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ADOPTING THE 2026 FEE SCHEDULE SETTING FEES AND CHARGES FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: WHEREAS, by O2024-012, the City Council approved a fee schedule effective January 1, 2025; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that adjustments to those fees are reasonable and appropriate for the year 2026. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee that the Fee Schedule dated January 1, 2026, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, is hereby approved and adopted in its entirety. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that the Fee Schedule shall be effective retroactively to January 1, 2026, unless indicated otherwise therein, and that all ordinances and resolutions inconsistent therewith are hereby repealed effective January 1, 2026. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this 6th day of January, 2026. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk 58 SOPE E City of Shakopee 2026 Fee Schedule (DRAFT — Proposed changes in red) Ordinance O2026-001 Updated 01/01/2026 59 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov CONTENTS Administration Fees 3 Economic Development Fees 6 Public Works Fees 7 Equipment Service Charges 7 Car/Truck Wash 7 Engineering Fees 8 Private Development 8 General Engineering 12 Planning Fees 14 Information/Document fees 14 Land Division Administration Fees 15 Land Use Administration Fees 15 Building Inspection Fees 17 State Surcharge: Permits 17 All Building Permit Fees for New Construction or Additions/Remodels 17 Electrical Permit Fees 18 Plumbing/Mechanical Permit Fees 19 New Construction Escrows 20 Rental Housing Licenses and Inspections 21 Other Building Inspection Fees 21 Health Division Fees 22 Hotel Licensing 23 Natural Resources Fees and Securities 23 Fees 23 Financial Security 23 Fire Department Fees 24 Fireworks 24 Fire Protection Equipment Permit 25 Police Department Fees 28 Parks and Recreation Fees 29 Community Center Fees 29 Ice Arena Fees 31 SandVenture Fees 32 Recreation Program Fees 32 Park Facilities 33 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 2 of 42 60 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov City of Shakopee -Recognized Service Groups 35 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 3 of 42 61 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Administration Fees Outdoor Performance Center (City Code 115.30) Show, Non -Transient Theme Parks, Amusement Parks, etc. (City Code 110.080) • Annual license fee per ride • Show without rides • Non -transient theme parks $520 $50/ride $80 Per agreement Cable Franchise Application (Resolution 6696) $350 + $7,500 Dog License • Yearly (expires one year from date of approval) • Lifetime $25 $125 Jump Drive copy of Government- Requested Data Actual cost Pawnshops and Secondhand Dealers (City Code 113.01) • Annual license fee • Initial license one-time investigation fee • Investigation fee for each new employee • Pawnshop billable transaction fee $2,500 $345 $100 $1.50 THC License (City Code 110.200) — fees will be replaced by Cannabis Retail License upon Office of Cannabis Management license implementation • Annual license fee • Provisional License Cannabis and Hemp Retail Licenses (City Code 151.007) $1,000 $5,000 Cannabis Registration Fees by Business Type be up to these amounts, or up to half of the fees imposed by the state (whichever is less) The actual registration and renewal fees charged shall Business Type Initial Fee Renewal Fee Cannabis Retailer $500 $1000 Lower Potency Hemp Retailer $125 $125 Medical Cannabis Combination Business $500 $1000 Cannabis Mezzobusiness $500 $1000 Cannabis Microbusiness $0 $500 Tobacco License (City Code 110.055) • Annual license fee • Initial license one-time investigation fee $200 $150 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 4 of 42 62 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Sale of Beer, Liquor, Wine, Setup, Club, Taproom, Small Brewer and Temporary Beer License (City Code 114.06) Annual fee for On -Sale Beer $312 Annual fee for Taproom & Small Brewer $800 Annual fee for Off -Sale Beer $100 Temporary Beer and Liquor $35 Annual fee for Setup $125 Annual fee for On -Sale Wine 1/2 of On -Sale Liquor or $2,000, whichever is greater Annual fee for On -Sale Club $300 Annual fee for Sunday Liquor $200 Annual fee for Off -Sale Liquor $150 Annual fee for On -Sale Wine & On -Sale Malt Liquor (Baseball Team) $500 Investigation fee for Off/On-Sale Liquor or Wine License: If investigation within Minnesota Outside Minnesota $330 City expenses up to $10,000 with $1,100 deposit Investigation fee for Taproom/Small Brewer: If investigation within Minnesota Outside Minnesota $300 City expenses up to $10,000 with $1,100 deposit Investigation fee for Off/On-Sale Beer $150 Annual Fee for On -Sale Liquor: Customer -Used Floor Area Outdoor seating: Additional fee shall be computed at one-third of whatever the fee would be for the additional square footage of customer -used floor area for the outdoor seating. Under 1,000 sq. ft. 1,000 - 1,999 sq. ft. 2,000 - 2,999 sq. ft. 3,000 - 3,999 sq. ft. 4,000 - 4,999 sq. ft. 5,000 - 5,999 sq. ft. 6,000 - 6,999 sq. ft. 7,000 - 7,999 sq. ft. 8,000 - 8,999 sq. ft. 9,000 - 9,999 sq. ft. 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 $3,705 $4,390 $5,080 $5,765 $6,445 $7,140 $7,820 $8,510 $9,195 $9,875 Page 5 of 42 63 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Over 10,000 sq. ft. $10,570 Massage License (City Code 116.01) • Investigation fee • Massage Therapist license fee • Massage Therapy Business license fee • Massage Therapy Business license renewal fee Refuse Hauler Collection Annual Rates (City Code 51.01) Pet Store Application (City Code 110.155) • Investigation fee • One-time license Peddlers/Solicitors (City Code 112.01) • Investigation fee • Annual weekly license - Peddlers only • Annual six-month license - Peddlers only • Annual yearly license - Peddlers only Transient Merchant (City Code 112.01) • Investigation fee • Annual weekly license • Annual six-month license • Annual yearly license Mobile Food Unit (City Code 110.185) Taxicabs and Drivers (City Code 110.025) • Annual fee for Taxicab Business license • Annual fee for Taxicab Drivers license • Annual fee for each vehicle • Initial license one-time investigation fee: , o Taxicab Business License o Taxicab Driver's License Towing Company License (City Code 119.01) • Annual Application Fee • Initial one-time investigation fee: Currency Exchange License Review (State law required) Shakopee Brick (for renovation projects) Office Charges • Photocopy & duplication fees • Service charge for each check returned (NSF) Upon receipt of an NSF check, no additional checks will be accepted from presenter Late Fees Service Fee for Certification (assessing) Delinquent Accounts 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 $50 $50 $100 $20 $125 $50 $100 $50 $50 $105 $160 $50 $50 $105 $160 $50 $275 $35 $16 $150 $100 $275 $150 $50 $1/brick $.25/side/page $30 1%/month after 90 days delinquency $25/parcel Page 6 of 42 64 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Economic Development Fees Tax Increment Financing Application Fee $12,000 escrow Tax Abatement Application Fee $12,000 escrow Minnesota Investment Fund Application Fee $6,000 escrow Unused escrow funds will be returned and additional fees above these amounts will be the responsibility of the applicant. Private Activity Revenue Bonds (Conduit Debt) (Resolution 7318) Application fee $1,000 Administration fee at closing $10,000 or 0.5% of principal bond, whichever is greater with maximum of $100,000 Refund previous bond issue $10,000 or 0.25% of principal refunding bond, whichever is greater with maximum of $50,000 All fees and expenses in relation to the issuance of the bonds, including the fees of the city's bond counsel, shall be the responsibility of the applicant regardless of whether the bonds are issued. Social District Fees • Social District License • Social District Cup $25 50(t per cup 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 7 of 42 65 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Public Works Fees EQUIPMENT SERVICE CHARGES All drivable equipment rates include an operator with a minimum rental time of two hours. Class 5 Truck Front End Loader Tractor Elgin Street Sweepers • Regenerative Air • Mechanical Broom Class 8 Single -Axle Dump Truck • Class 8 Single -Axle Dump Truck With Plow and Wing Single -Person Aerial Bucket Truck Class 3 Truck • Class 3 Truck With Plow Water Tanker/Flusher Trash Compactor Mower Tractor • Turf Type Weed Mowing (Rough) Asphalt Roller 1-1 1 Ton Skid Steer Small Grader Woodchipper Sewer Jet Cleaning Vacuum Inductor Labor Rate Overtime Labor Rate Paint Striper 8 -inch Pump Excavator Pressure Washer Trailer 4 -inch Pump Bituminous Street Repair 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 $92 $95/hour $155/hour $1-22 $126/hour $--1-5-2 $157/hour $--1--3-2 $136/hour $--1--1-6 $12O/hour g $163/hour $1O4 $1O7/hour $80 $82/hour $92 $95/hour 6 $12O/hour $92 $95/hour $92 $95/hour $101 $1O4/hour $87 $90/hour $1011 $1O7/hour $1011 $1O7/hour $711 $76/hour $1110 $144/hour $--1--3-5 $139/hour $57 $59/hour $86 $89/hour $7-7 $80/hour $98 $101/hour $1-28 $132/hour $7-7 $80/hour $77 $80/hour $77 $80/hour Time and materials basis only Page 8 of 42 66 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov CAR/TRUCK WASH $7/$9 per wash 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 9 of 42 67 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Engineering Fees PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT Street, utility and water main fees for private developments apply in situations where developers decide to construct the public improvements themselves rather than have the City of Shakopee construct them via a public improvement project. The fees and charges collected are intended to reimburse the city for all direct and indirect costs incurred by the Public Works Department to process the development application, process and administer the project, review and approve the plans for the project, inspect the construction of the project and inspect and maintain the project once complete. The fees and charges below are collected prior to recording of the plat, unless otherwise noted. The percentages and rates are based on historical costs incurred by the city and are reviewed on an annual basis. Street and Utility Fee This fee is a lump sum of 7.5% of the construction costs for the following public improvements: streets, sidewalks, boulevard trees, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and other associated appurtenances. Adjustments to this fee must be approved by the City Engineer based on additional or reduced services, e.g., when the developer provides 100% construction inspection, the fee would be reduced to 5%. Watermain Fee This fee is a lump sum of 7.5 % (this includes 1.5% for administration and 2.5% for plan review/coordination and 3.5% for inspection) of the construction costs for the following public improvements: watermain and other associated appurtenances. On private development projects where no City infrastructure (streets, sidewalk, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, etc.) is required, however public watermain shall be installed SPU will provide complete construction observation and will collect fees necessary for this observation. The City will not be required to provide construction observation for this infrastructure and will not collect the necessary watermain inspection fees. Please note, Shakopee Public Utilities (SPU) requires separate fees/charges not listed in this document. Therefore, you will need to contact SPU at 952-445-1988 to obtain these amounts. Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) Administration Please note, if outside consultants are used, their total costs will be charged to the developer. If City of Shakopee employees are used, their hourly rates and a multiplier of 2.0 will be charged to the developer. WCA Application o WCA Application — Wetland Boundary/Type o WCA Application — Replacement Plan o WCA Application — Other Decision Type Storm Water Management Plan Review Fee Please note, if outside consultants are used, their total costs will be charged to the developer. • Single -Family Residential Property Stormwater Management Application • All Other Developments Stormwater Management Application (based on land disturbance) O 10 acres or less - O 10 acres to 50 acres - O 50 acres or more - Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge $258/application + hourly rates $267.00/application + hourly rates $267.00/application + hourly rates $267.00/application + hourly rates $267 $2,000 $2,068 $2,500 $2,585 $3,000 $3,102 This charge is applicable per the City of Shakopee's Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge Policy. The developable area is defined as the total area of the final plat, less areas of outlots set aside for future development, right-of-way, lakes, wetlands, easements encompassing the 100 -year high water levels of storm water basins, conservation easements and parks. • Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge $3,381 $3,496/net developable acre Lateral Sanitary Sewer Connection Charge 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 10 of 42 68 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov • County Road 83 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Connection Charge $1,480/SAC unit This charge is applicable to all properties and developments connecting to the sanitary sewer extending from the south plat boundary of the Church Addition to the north plat boundary of the River Valley Estates 1st and 2nd Additions. The charge is due when a property connects to the lateral or prior to the recording of a final plat for a development connecting to the lateral. • Jennifer Lane Sanitary Sewer Lateral Connection Charge $6,097.00/acre This charge applies to all properties and developments abutting Jennifer Lane and connecting to the Jennifer Lane Sanitary Sewer between Valley Creek Crossing 2nd Addition to Wood Duck Trail. The charge is to be collected at the time of connection to the public sanitary sewer or the recording of a final plat for a development utilizing the sanitary sewer, whichever is earlier. • Whispering Oaks Sanitary Sewer Lateral Connection Charge $4,486/SAC unit This charge applies to all future properties and developments connecting to the sanitary sewer extending along Muhlenhardt Road between County Highway 16 and Horizon Drive and along Horizon Drive between Muhlenhardt Road and County Highway 18. The charge is to be collected at the earlier of the time of connection to the public sanitary sewer or the recording of a final plat for a future development utilizing the sanitary sewer. Sanitary Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) units are calculated using the most recent version of the Metropolitan Council SAC Procedures Manual. • Maras Street and Hansen Avenue Area Sanitary Sewer Lateral Connection Charge $5,891.73 $6,092.05/developable acre This charge applies to all properties and developments connecting to the sanitary sewer extending along Maras Street between 13th Avenue and Hansen Avenue, Hansen Avenue between Maras Street and Stagecoach Road, and 13thAvenue between Stagecoach Road and the City of Shakopee East boundary. The charge is to be collected at the time of connection to the public sanitary sewer, sale of property, or the recording of a final plat for a future development utilizing the sanitary sewer, whichever is earlier. The developable area is defined as the total area of the final plat or parcel, less areas of outlots set aside for future development, right-of-way, lakes, wetlands, easements encompassing the 100 -year high water levels of stormwater basins, conservation easements and parks. • Stagecoach Road Sanitary Sewer Lateral Connection Charge $5,634.26/developable acre This charge applies to all properties and developments connecting to the sanitary sewer extending along the east side of Stagecoach Road between 13th Avenue and Hansen Avenue. The charge is to be collected at the time of connection to the public sanitary sewer, sale of the property, or the recording of a final plat for a future development utilizing the sanitary sewer, whichever is earlier. The developable area is defined as the total area of the final plat or parcel, less areas of outlots set aside for future development, right-of-way, lakes, wetlands, easement encompassing the 100 -year high water levels of stormwater basins, conservation easements and parks. • Hansen Avenue Lift Station Sanitary Sewer Lateral Connection Charge $257.11/developable acre This charge applies to all properties and developments on Stagecoach Road between Hansen Avenue and Preserve Trail, Boiling Springs Lane between Stagecoach Road and Preserve Trail, Boiling Springs Circle, Preserve Court, Preserve Trail between Stagecoach Road and the City of Shakopee East Boundary, Creek Ridge Court, Kelly Circle, and County 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 11 of 42 69 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Road 18 between Eagle Creek Boulevard and McColl Drive. The charge is to be collected at the time of connection to the public sanitary sewer Lift Station or the recording of a final plat for a future development utilizing the sanitary sewer, whichever is earlier. The developable area is defined as the total area of the final plat or parcel, less areas of outlots set aside for future development, right-of-way, lakes, wetlands, easements encompassing the 100 -year high water levels of stormwater basins, conservation easements and parks. • West End Lower Bluff Area Sanitary Sewer Lateral Connection Charge $728.55/developable acre This charge applies to all properties and developments connecting to the sanitary sewer extending to the West End Lower Bluff Lift Station located on the East side of County Road 69 and Emery Way South of Highway 169. The charge is to be collected at the time of connection to the public sanitary sewer or the recording of a final plat for a future development utilizing the sanitary sewer lift station, whichever is earlier. The developable area is defined as the total area of the final plat or parcel, less areas of outlots set aside for future development, right-of-way, lakes, wetlands, easements encompassing the 100 -year high water levels of stormwater basins, conservation easements and parks. VIP and VIP II Connection Charges The Valley Industrial Park (VIP) charges are applicable to properties and developments connecting to the VIP and VIP II sanitary sewers located in the Old Urban Shakopee. The charge is due when a property connects to the lateral or prior to the recording of a final plat for a development connecting to the lateral. • VIP Connection Charge • VIP II Connection Charge Trunk Storm Water Charge $1,442/acre $551/acre This charge is applicable per the City of Shakopee's Trunk Storm Water Charge Justification Report. The developable square footage is calculated by taking the total area of the development minus the total areas for outlots set aside for future development, rights -of- way, lakes, wetlands, easements encompassing the 100 -year high water levels of storm water basins, conservation easements and parks. Please note, for commercial and industrial developments, this charge is due at the time of building permit issuance. • Density of development (three or less lots/acres) • Density of development (more than three lots/acres) • Commercial/Industrial developments Trunk Storm Water Storage and Treatment Charge $04-57 $0.1620/developable sq. ft. $0.206 $0.2130/developable sq. ft. $0.258 $0.2670/developable sq. ft. This charge is applicable per the City of Shakopee's Trunk Storm Water Charge Justification Report and is charged to all developments utilizing regional storm ponding systems. The developable square footage is calculated by taking the total area of the development minus the total areas for outlots set aside for future development, rights -of -way, lakes, wetlands, easements encompassing the 100- year high water levels of storm water basins, conservation easements and parks. Please note, for commercial and industrial developments, this charge is due at the time of building permit issuance. • Density of development (three or less lots/acre) • Density of development (more than three lots/acre) • Commercial/Industrial developments Regional Infiltration Pond Charge This charge is applicable to all developments utilizing regional infiltration pond systems. $07545 $0.564/developable sq. ft. $0781-9 $0.847/developable sq. ft. $1.095 $1.132/developable sq. ft. 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 12 of 42 70 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov • Regional Infiltration Pond Charge $49,074 $50,743/new impervious acre 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 13 of 42 71 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Water Connection Charge (WCC) The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission's (SPU) WAC = Trunk Water Charge (TWC) + Water Connection Charge (WCC) as defined by SPUC. The TWC is due at the time "water availability" is desired by the property owner, usually at time of platting. The TWC can sometimes be paid by city assessments but is usually paid in a lump sum directly to SPU by the property owner/developer. SPU defines property areas granted water availability by resolution. In some instances, water mains are adjacent to a given property, but the TWC has not yet been paid and consequently water is not yet available. In all cases, prior to water main construction plan approval for water mains to be installed within property the applicable TWC must be paid in advance of plan approval. The WCC is due at the time a building permit is requested for new construction or building expansion. The WCC is paid directly to SPU and is usually based on the Metropolitan Council's SAC unit determination plus an additional per -square -foot charge for "industrial use" spaces. SPU's WCC policy provides for additional WCC fees based on actual water usage that is in excess of the assigned SAC unit values. Please note Shakopee Public Utilities calculates and collects these charges. Therefore, you will need to contact them at 952-445-1988 to obtain these amounts. Sign Installation Fee Street name sign furnished and installed • Traffic control sign furnished and installed • Conservation easement/wetland sign or post installation • Temporary no -parking sign installation Bituminous Sealcoat Fee $360/sign pole 3 $291/sign $291/sign or post $17 $17/sign This fee is for costs associated with the first bituminous -paved streets in the development. The rate is based on the most recent contract unit price(s) the City of Shakopee receives plus inflation cost escalation factor for the following year's increases and administration costs. • Bituminous sealcoat Grading Permit Fee $1.78/square yard of bituminous paved street Please note, the cost associated with site grading is not based on the purchase price of any fill, but rather the cost to move/place/compact it once on the site. This fee is due at the time of grading permit issuance. Projects costing up to $200,000 5.5% of the cost associated with the site grading and all erosion control measures. The minimum fee is $75. Projects costing more than $200,000 $11,000 + 3% of all costs associated with the site grading and all erosion control measures in excess of $200,000. Unauthorized Work Fee Up to double the permit fee MS4 Administration Fee The MS4 Administration Fee is due at the time of grading permit issuance or prior to recording a final plat if no permit is issued prior to plat approval. • 1% of the costs associated with the site grading and all erosion control measures for projects disturbing more than 1 acre National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Program Fee The NPDES permit program is a mandate set forth by the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Water Act and it is administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The goal of this permit, according to the MPCA, is to "reduce the amount of sediment and pollution that enters surface and ground water from storm sewer systems to the maximum extent practicable." 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 14 of 42 72 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Please note, if outside consultants are used, their total costs will be charged to the developer. • Erosion and Sediment Control Application $60 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 15 of 42 73 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov GENERAL ENGINEERING The general engineering fees collected are intended to reimburse the City of Shakopee for all direct and indirect costs incurred by the Public Works Department to process, prepare, review, and inspect the various projects and requests. The percentages and rates are based on historical costs incurred by the city and are reviewed on an annual basis. City Improvement Projects and Miscellaneous Work Afee for administration of all City of Shakopee improvement projects is the actual total of costs associated with the project, including staff time. Please note, if outside entities are used, their total costs will be added to the fee. Grading Permit Fee Please note, the cost associated with site grading is not based on the purchase price of any fill, but rather the cost to move/place/compact it once on the site. This fee is due at the time of grading permit issuance. Projects costing up to $200,000 5.5% of the cost associated with the site grading and all erosion control measures. The minimum fee is $75. Projects costing more than $200,000 $11,000 + 3% of all costs associated with the site grading and all erosion control measures in excess of $200,000. Unauthorized Work Fee Up to double the permit fee MS4 Administration Fee 1% of the costs associated with the site grading and all erosion control measures for projects disturbing more than 1 acre National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Program Fee The NPDES permit program is a mandate set forth by the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Water Act and it is administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The goal of this permit, according to the MPCA, is to "reduce the amount of sediment and pollution that enters surface and ground water from storm sewer systems to the maximum extent practicable." Please note, if outside consultants are used, their total costs will be charged to the property owner. • Erosion and Sediment Control Application Right -of -Way Permit Fee $60 $62 Registration fee (based on certificate of insurance expiration date) $60 $66/registration Excavation permit fee General Work and Commercial Services (drop) Emergency $170 $176/each or 5 $171/drop, Emergency: $341/each New/replacement service connection, (drop) Non- commercial $353/each $43 $44/each or $43 $44/drop Trench and Directional Boring (less than 100 ft) $170 $200 + $0.57/ft. If trench, $118+8- joint $0.29/ft. per each utility Trench and Directional Boring (more than 100 ft) $400 + $0.57/ft. If joint trench, $118 + $0.29/ft. Cable pull in duct (if separate from duct work installation) 0 $176 + $0.29/ft. 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 16 of 42 74 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Obstruction Permit Fee WO $176/each up to 3 days, $353/each more than 3 days Delay Fee 0 $176 + $56 $58/week Small Wireless Facility Permit Fee $170/each Small Wireless Facility Annual Rent (collocation) 5 $181/annually Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement $2500 Permit extension $34 + $34/week Degradation fee $353 + All costs incurred to repair the street to the appropriate street restoration detail plates if the permittee elects not to repair the street. Unauthorized work $353 + double the permit fee (maximum of $1,000) Curb cut 5 $295/each Encroachment Agreement Fee $170 $176/each agreement Other work not specified above Fee based on all costs incurred by staff (minimum of $80 $83) Miscellaneous • Assessment search report (paper copy) Note: Assessment searches can be performed online by customers free of charge. • Complete or partial assessment rolls or reports (For shipping if applicable) • Splitting special assessments/parcels • Topographic/Infrastructure map (Hard copy and electronic) • Computer/Plotter-generated map (Minimum of $15/each) • City of Shakopee street index map (large) • City of Shakopee map (large) • Aerial map (small) • Aerial map (large) • City of Shakopee Standard Specifications and Detail Plates • City of Shakopee Design Criteria Storm Water Drainage Utility This fee is charged per Residential Equivalent Factor (REF) * Acre/Billing Cycle (monthly). One REF is defined as the ratio of the average volume of runoff generated by one acre of a given land use to the average volume of runoff generated by one acre of typical residential land during a standard one-year rainfall event. • Citywide fee Sewer Service $25/each $25/roll or report +$5 $600/request $30 + $45/hour $60/hours $8/each $10/each $15/each $50/each $10/each $10/each $8.85/REF*acre/billing cycle (monthly) Fixed fee $4.00 $4.60/billing cycle For every 1,000 gallons or part thereof of metered flow or water usage: City rate Metropolitan Council Environmental Services rates $1.05/billing cycle $2.89/billing cycle Unmetered residential water accounts $27,545 $28.50/billing cycle Summer sewer cap (May through November) 115% of March usage (5k minimum cap) 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 17 of 42 75 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov City Sanitary Sewer Service Charge (SAC) This charge is applicable to various residential, commercial, public and institutional facilities. The Metropolitan Council determines the total number of units for each facility by utilizing the most recent edition of the Metropolitan Council SAC Procedures Manual. • City SAC 4 $600/unit 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 18 of 42 76 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Planning Fees INFORMATION/DOCUMENT FEES Long -Range Planning Documents • Comprehensive Plan (paper copy) Note: The city's 2040 Comprehensive Plan is available on the city website. City Codes • Chapter 151— Zoning Ordinance • Chapter 150 - Subdivision Regulations Note: Shakopee City Code is available at www.ShakopeeMN.gov/citycode. Services • Zoning verification letter - Simple • Zoning verification letter — Complex • Flood plain verification letter • Courier services $175 $25 $20 $100 $250 $40 Fee to be determined (If courier services are required or requested by the applicant, the city shall not be responsible for any charges associated with this service. The applicant must pay all associated costs within 10 days or at the time of release of any document or approval, whichever comes first.) Recording Fees (established by Scott County) • Abstract and Torrens documents, Plats/RLS/CIS Fees vary per Scott County regulations and will be charged back to the applicant. Sign Permit Fees • Permanent— Wall sign • Freestanding sign • Change of sign face • Temporary • Retrieval of confiscated, illegal signs Flexible Dumpsters • First notice of violation • Second notice of violation • Third notice is Removal of Flexible Dumpster Varies $150 $250 $75 $75 $45 no charge $50.00 $150.00 Residential Parking Permit $15 + $5 processing fee 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 19 of 42 77 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov LAND DIVISION ADMINISTRATION FEES Concept Review by Planning Commission Application for Planned Unit Development • PUD concept review (including City Council) • Planned Unit Development • Amendment to Planned Unit Development Plat Fees • Preliminary Plat • Preliminary and Final Plat concurrently • Final Plat • Title review fee Minor Subdivisions • Lot division/lot reassembly • Registered land surveys LAND USE ADMINISTRATION FEES Vacations • Vacations of public easements and right-of-way Park Dedication Fees (City Code 150.65) These are set by City Council in consultation with Park and Recreation Advisory Board. Cash in lieu of land dedication fees: Residential/Single-family/Duplex (per unit) • Multifamily/Apartment (per unit) with less than 60 percent one -bedroom or studio • Multifamily/Apartment (per unit) with more than 60 percent one -bedroom or studio Commercial/Industrial (per acre) Application for Appeals • Appeal to Board of Adjustment and Appeals of staff decision • Appeal to City Council of BOAA decision (other than a single-family home) • Appeal to City Council of BOAA decision for single-family home • Determination by BOAA Application for Variances • Single-family residential • All others Application for Conditional Use Permit $400 $800 $3,500 $3,500 $3,550 $4,000 $4,500 $5,000 $1,550 $2000 Actual cost $650 $1,550 $1,000 $5,340 $5,500/unit $4,450 $4,500/unit $2,225 $2,500/unit $9,500 $10,000/acre $500 $500 $100 $500 $250 $500 • Home Occupations $250 • All Conditional Use Permits and amendments $500 • Mineral Extraction & Land Rehabilitation permit $2,500 + $2,500 cash deposit and an agreement to pay all administrative costs and consultant fees • Temporary seasonal sales (including farm products) • Home dog boarding for daycare license $50 $100 per year Application for Environmental Review 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 20 of 42 78 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov The project proponent will be required to sign an agreement to reimburse the entire and actual cost of conducting a review. • Environmental Assessment Worksheet • Environmental Impact Statement • Alternative Urban Area Wide Review AUAR West End Fee Outdoor Caf� • 500 sq. ft. or less • 501 sq. ft. or more $1,000 plus agreement $1,000 plus agreement $1,000 plus agreement $1,000/acre $250 $500 Parklet $500 Maps and Text Amendments • Zoning map amendments (rezoning less than an acre) • Zoning map amendments (rezoning an acre or more) • Text amendments • Comprehensive Plan amendment (including extension of MUSA) • Annexation application fee Additional Notices (Applies to all types of applications) Public Notice Sign Required to be paid in advance for a Planning Commission or BOAA action. • Large sign • Small sign Notes for the Planning Fees: $1,000 $3,000 $500 $2,500 $500 Actual cost Actual cost per contractor $50 Administrative Costs — Actions requiring payment for administrative costs may be billed to the applicant. Administrative costs may include, but are not limited to, the following: staff time (including regular city employees and contracted employees), publishing costs, copying, printing and mailing. The actual hourly rates of the employees will be used plus a multiplier of 2.0 times for benefits. A deposit of $100 will be required to begin the work, any unused portion will be returned and invoices provided for work in excess of $100 before work proceeds. Administrative costs will accrue after the first meeting with the applicant. Any escrows received by the city shall be monitored to ensure sufficient escrow funds are held by the city. When an escrow account reaches a balance of 10% of the original escrow amount, the city shall invoice the applicant for the submittal of additional escrow funds in an amount consistent with the original escrow submittal. This process shall continue until the city has completed all necessary reviews. Escrows requested by city departments are detailed on billing generated by various city departments depending on the scope of the project. 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 21 of 42 79 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Building Inspection Fees Fees are calculated based on the most recent building valuation tables published by the International Code Council (ICC). The building valuation is based on the total value of all construction work, including plumbing, electrical, mechanical systems, finish work and labor, even if the owner is doing the work. ELECTRONIC PROCESSING FEE FOR ALL PROJECTS, PERMITS AND LICENSES • $10,000 valuation or less • $10,000 valuation or more $15 .0015 x valuation, maximum of $35,000 STATE SURCHARGE PERMITS The Minnesota Statutes 326B.148 "SURCHARGE" has been changed effective July 1, 2015. The change only applies to the "Permits based on Fixed Fees, Part I" and "Permits based on Fixed Fees, Part 2" portions of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry surcharge reporting form. The minimum surcharge for a "fixed fee" permit is $5, beginning July 1, 2010. (These fees are forwarded to the State Treasurer) Less than $1,000 $0.50 $1,000,000 or less .0005 x valuation $1,000,000 to $2,000,000 $500 + .0004 x (value - $1,000,000) $2,000,000 to $3,000,000 $900 + .0003 x (value - $2,000,000) $3,000,000 to $4,000,000 $1,200 +.0002 x (value - $3,000,000) $4,000,000 to $5,000,000 $1,400 + .0001 x (value - $4,000,000) Greater than $5,000,000 $1,500 + .00005 x (value - $5,000,000) PLAN REVIEW FEES Plan review fees shall be applied to all building permits. Per state statute, similar plan structures shall be charged 25% of the normal building permit fee. At the time of application for permits the applicant must note that the permits are for documents/plans for similar plan structures, or the standard fee shall apply. • Residential • Commercial • Similar plan structures • Electrical plan review • Grading Review o Residential o Commercial/Industrial 65% of building permit fee 65% of building permit fee 25% of building permit fee 20% of electrical permit fee $75 $74 + $20 x each Acre ALL BUILDING PERMIT FEES FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION OR ADDITIONS/REMODELS Building permit fees are determined using the building/project value and the table below. Permit fees apply to new construction and additions/remodels of structures. Project/Building Value Fees Less than $1,000 $55 $1,001 to $5,000 $55 + .0085 x (valuation - $1,000) $5,001 to $249,999 $105 + .0085 x (valuation - $5,000) $250,000 to $1,999,999 $3,500 + .005 x (valuation - $249,999) $2,000,000 or more $15,000 + .005 x (valuation - $1,999,999) Reroofing Permit 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 22 of 42 80 • Commercial requires special inspection per IBC 1704) • Residential City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov 2.5% of contract amount, with an $80 minimum (Plan review is 30% but 2.5% of contract amount, with an $75 minimum Requires ice/weather/prep inspection. Prior building department approval is required to submit photos in lieu of inspection. When prep inspection does not occur, a $74.50 fine will be levied against the applicant. Residing Permits Deck Permits Fence Permits Detached Accessory Building All detached accessory building/structures more than 200 square feet shall require a building permit HEATING, AIR CONDITIONING, REFRIGERATION AND VENTILATION PERMITS Based on valuation table Based on valuation table $50 $100 Based on valuation table Single family residence, new $125 + $1 state surcharge HVAC Replacement $75 + $1 state surcharge Fireplace — includes Gas Permit (for additions only) $75 + $1 state surcharge Gas Piping Permit - Residential $75 + $1 state surcharge each fixture or appliance Commercial fee 2.5% of contract amount + state surcharge with an $80 minimum fee _i OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES Unauthorized work or work without a permit Double permit fee For the items listed below the actual hourly rates of employees plus a multiplier of 2.0 for benefits and overhead will be used. • Inspections outside of normal business hours (minimum charge — two hours) • Re -inspection activities • Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated • Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved plans • Use of outside consultants for plan checking, inspections or both. Actual costs will be paid by the developer. ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES Residential New Construction Fee (One- or Two -Family) • 3,000 square feet and below • 3,001 square feet and above Residential Existing Fees I • Garages/Basement Finishes/Additions/Solar • Existing one- or two-family home renovation Reconnection to existing circuit or feeder • Inspection of grounding electrode Radon system Furnace/air conditioner replacement Service panel • Swimming pool • Extra trip charge or failure • State surcharge $200 $225 $250 $70 $175 5 $50 5 $50 5 $50 $5$50 $5$50 $70 $35 .0005 x total job valuation, or $1 minimum 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 23 of 42 81 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Electrical Commercial Fees Job Valuation Fees $1 to $1,300 $56 $1,301 to $5,000 $56 + .025 x (valuation - $1,300) $5,001 to $10,000 $162 + .024 x (valuation - $5,000) $10,001 to $25,000 $297.50 + .023 x (valuation - $10,000) $25,001 to $50,000 $651 + .021 x (valuation - $25,000) $50,001 and over $1,186.50 + .02 x (valuation - $50,000) • Manufactured home/RV supply • RV pedestals • Street, parking lot, outdoor, traffic standards • Power supplies for signs and outline lighting • Trip charge • Commercial event • Generators • State surcharge PLUMBING PERMIT FEES Plumbing Permits (City Code 111.04) $35/pedestal $10/circuit $5/standard $10/power supply $56 $56 trip/ride $56 .0005 x total job valuation, or $1 minimum New construction residential (Ordnance 659) $175 + $1 state surcharge Sewer and water connection — Single Residential Sewer connection Water connection -11 Combination water and sewer connection Storm sewer connection $80 + $1 state surcharge Sewer and/or water connection — Multiple Residential 2.5% of contract price or $100 minimum + state surcharge Sewer and/or water connection — Commercial/Industrial 2.5% of contract price or $100 minimum + state surcharge 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 24 of 42 82 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Landscape sprinkler system $75 + $1 state surcharge Reduced Pressure Zone Value— Repair, rebuild, replace Change out required every five years. There is no permit or fee required for annual testing. There is an allowance of up to 6 RPZs/building/application. $100 + $1 state surcharge Lawn sprinkler systems — Residential $75 + $1 state surcharge Lawn sprinkler systems — Commercial This includes water connection from building piping to yard side of siphon breaker. 2.5% of contract price or $80 minimum + state surcharge Commercial Plumbing Permits Alter, replacement, repairs (Basement Finish) 2.5% of contract price or $100 minimum + state surcharge Minimum fee $75 + $1 state surcharge Residential Water Heater (installer must be licensed plumber) $75 + $1 state surcharge Sewer and/or water line repair only $75 + $1 state surcharge Water Softener (Installer must be licensed) $75 + $1 state surcharge Grease Trap Permit and Inspection $250 Units on individual sewage treatment systems (ISTS) are subject to an additional review fee by Scott County. NEW CONSTRUCTION ESCROWS The city will accept payment for the following escrows. The city will release escrows upon verification of completed required improvements. The city may only return escrows to the party from which they were received. Certificate of Occupancy Escrow 100% of the fee shall be refunded when a final certificate of occupancy is issued. • Commercial/Industrial • Residential Residential Landscaping Escrow $5,000 100% of fee will be refunded in whole to the applicant when landscaping requirements have been completed. Commercial Landscaping Escrow A commercial landscaping escrow is determined based on City Code 151.112. Erosion Control Escrow (City Code 54.45) .005 x value or $500, whichever is greater .005 x value, with a $2,500 maximum An escrow will be required to guarantee the installation and removal of all required erosion and sediment control measures. The city is authorized to draw against this escrow in the event the building permit applicant fails to comply. Inspection fee (per violation) is $500 for commercial and $200 for residential. • Commercial • Residential $1,500 + $1,000/acre $1,500 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 25 of 42 83 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov RENTAL HOUSING LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS Single Family & Townhouses previously owner -occupied or not licensed properties Conversion fee Exception if a CO has been issued within 36 months for new construction Single Family & Townhouse Annual Fee First Reinspection Second Reinspection Third Reinspection Fourth Reinspection Apartments with 2 to 10 units Annual Fee First Reinspection Second Reinspection Third Reinspection Fourth Reinspection Apartments with 11 to 100 units Annual Fee First Reinspection per unit Second Reinspection per unit Third Reinspection per unit Fourth Reinspection per unit Apartments with 101 or more units Annual Fee First Reinspection per unit Second Reinspection per unit Third Reinspection per unit Fourth Reinspection per unit SHORT TERM RENTAL LICENSING (City Code 117) Short Term Rental License First Inspection Reinspection Second Reinspection Third Reinspection Annual fees double for any building or units found not registered $500 $250 $50 $50 $100 $200 $500.00 + $40/unit per year $50 $50 $100 $200 $1,000 + $40/unit per year $50 $50 $100 $200 $2,500 + $40/unit per year $50 $50 $100 $200 $250/year $50 $50 $50 $100 Any developments with 30% of unit failures after one year of inspections Reinspection Fees Double OTHER BUILDING INSPECTION FEES Structure Moving Permit $100 Demolition Permit $125 or 2.5% of contract price, whichever is greater Work Commencing before Demolition Permit Issued $300 or 3% of contract price, whichever is greater Appeal Fee Appeals can be made to the Building Code Board of Adjustment & Appeals established by the Department of Labor and Industry (DLI). Fees are as established by DLI. Sanitary Sewer Service Availability Charge (SAC) and Water Availability Charge (WAC) Sanitary Sewer Service Availability Charge (SAC) units for various residential, commercial, public and institutional facilities will be applied as specified in the latest Metropolitan Council SAC procedures manual. The Metropolitan Council established SAC fees on an annual basis. These fees are collected by the city but are paid to the MET Council on behalf of the applicant. Current fees and how they are calculated is available here: 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 26 of 42 84 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov https://metrocouncil.org/wastewater-water/funding-finance/Rates-Charges/Sewer-Availability-Charge.aspx The WAC charge is paid to Shakopee Public Utilities (SPUC) for water service and is typically based on the number of SAC units. Contact SPUC for the current fees. Please note Shakopee Public Utilities calculates and collects these charges. Therefore, you will need to contact them at 952-445-1988 to obtain these amounts. Change of Occupancy Fee If you intend to change the tenant or use of a commercial property, you must notify the city to ensure that the new use complies with zoning regulations. This requirement applies whether the usage change applies to one tenant (i.e., office space to physician's practice) or the entire building (i.e., retail to restaurant. • If no change to occupancy classification $50 Notes for the building fee schedule: Administrative costs — Actions requiring payment for administrative costs may be billed to the applicant. Administrative costs may include but are not limited to the following: staff time (regular city employees and contracted employees), publishing costs, copying, printing and mailing. The actual hourly rates of the employees will be used plus a multiplier of 2.0 for benefits. A deposit of $100 will be required to begin the work. Any unused portion would be returned, and invoices provided for work in excess of $100 before work proceeds. HEALTH DIVISION FEES FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS Type I — Highest Risk Includes: • Caterers • Schools, hospitals, care facilities • Restaurants with bulk cooling & reheating • High -complexity operations (multiple CCPs) Type II — High Risk Includes: • Most full -service restaurants • Bars with full kitchens • Hotels serving hot breakfast with raw foods Type III — Moderate Risk Includes: • Most full -service restaurants • Bars with full kitchens • Hotels serving hot breakfast with raw foods $1,500/year $1,200/year $700/year Type IV — Low Risk $400/year Includes: • Convenience stores with warmers • Gas stations with minimal prep • Coffee -only shops Type V — Lowest Risk $250/year Includes: • Prepackaged retail • Bars with only prepackaged foods • Office snack kiosks Additional Fee Components Plan Review for Health New Construction $500 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 27 of 42 85 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Major Remodel Minor Remodel Reinspection Fees First Second Third Mobile Food Units (without state inspection) High -risk (Type II equivalent): Low -risk (type III -V equivalent): Late Penalties Late renewal: Operating without license: Note: Licensees are also required to pay applicable State of Minnesota fees. HOTEL LICENSING (City Code 118) Hotel License Fee Hotel Inspection Fees: Base Annual License Fee (by Room Count) Small Lodging (1-50 rooms) Medium Hotel (51-150 rooms) Large Hotel (151-300 rooms) Add-on Fees for Amenities Requiring Inspection Indoor Pool Outdoor Pool Spa/Hot Tub Sauna/Steam Room Continental Breakfast Area (no full kitchen) Full Kitchen (restaurant within hotel) $1200 each $250 $100 $100 $150 $300 $300 $200 25% surcharge Double annual fee $150 $300/year + $25 per room $500/year + $20 per room $700/year + $15 per room $150/year $150/year $150/year $150/year $250/year Restaurant fee Laundry Facility $25/year Plan Review/Remodel Fees (Health Only) For new hotels, major remodels, or additions: New Hotel Construction Major Remodel (kitchen, pool, laundry) Minor Remodel (paint, flooring, FF&E only) Reinspection Fees Only for violations requiring a return visit First Inspection Second or subsequent reinspections 1 Nr Late Renewal/Penalty Fees Late license renewal 25% surcharge Operating without a license inspection Note: Licensees must also pay any Minnesota State fees. Natural Resources Fees and Securities FEES Soil Compaction Testing for Landscaped Areas $600 $600 No fee $100 $150 Double the annual fee + required • City -hired consultant is used Total cost of consultant 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 28 of 42 86 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov City -Required Replacement Trees Fee (for replacement trees that cannot be placed on site) $400 $600/each tree Unauthorized Significant Tree Removal $500/diameter inch removed or replacement of 2 diameter inches for every 1 diameter inch removed Additional Requested Tree Inspection Inspection will be charged on an hourly basis at actual hourly rates plus a multiplier of 2.0 for benefits. The city is authorized to draw against the Tree Management Regulations financial security for tree replacement requirements to pay for inspections. FINANCIAL SECURITY Financial Security for Required Replacement Trees # replacement trees x $200 x 150% In accordance with City Code 151.113, J 3 & 4, up to 75% of the financial security may be returned upon inspection and acceptance by the city of installed landscaping and upon the submittal of the city approved two-year warranty from the landscape contractor who installed the plants. This warranty must cover plant health issues relating to excess or insufficient water. The remaining financial security will be held by the city for two years. Unauthorized Work Fee Up to double the permit fee \\' '''‘ 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 29 of 42 87 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Fire Department Fees FIREWORKS Consumer/Retail Fireworks Permit • Mixed merchandise sales annual fee • Consumer fireworks retail sales facility annual fee Display Outdoor Fireworks Show Permit • Permit (valid for one day only) • Each additional day Standby personnel may be required at the direction of the Fire Code Official. Additional fees will be applied in accordance with the fee schedule. See Other Fees section below. Indoor or Special Effect Fireworks Show Permit • Permit (valid for one day only) • Each additional day Standby personnel may be required at the direction of the Fire Code Official. Additional fees will be applied in accordance with the fee schedule. See Other Fees section below. FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT PERMIT $100 $350 $130 $35 $175 $35 Fire sprinkler, fire alarm and special hazard systems. Includes wet and dry fire sprinkler systems, clean agent suppression systems, wet and dry chemical suppression systems, fire protection for commercial cooking operations and fire alarm systems. Contract Amount Contract amounts round up to the next highest $1,000 Permit Fee $1.00 to $ 4,000 $85 minimum $4,001 to $25,000 $85 for the first $4,000 + $22 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000 $25,001 to $50,000 $547 for the first $25,000 + $12 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000 $50,001 to $100,000 $847 for the first $50,000 + $10for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000 $100,001 to $500,000 $1,347 for the first $100,000 + $6.50 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000 $500,001 to $1,000,000 $3,947 for the first $500,000 + $5.50 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000 $1,000,001 to $1,500,000 $6,697 for the first $1,000,000 + $4 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,500,000 $1,500,001 to $2,00,000 $8,697 for the first $1,500,000 + $2 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000,000 $2,000,000 and up $9,697 for the first $2,000,000 + $1.50 for each additional $1,000 of fraction thereof Fire protection equipment includes: wet and dry fire sprinkler systems, clean agent suppression systems, wet and dry chemical 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 30 of 42 88 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov suppression systems, fire protection for commercial cooking operations and fire alarm systems. State Surcharge Applies to fire sprinkler, fire alarm and special hazard systems. Fire Protection Equipment Plan Review Fee Minnesota Statute 3266.148 Applies to wet and dry fire sprinkler systems, clean agent suppression systems, wet and dry chemical suppression systems, fire protection for commercial cooking operations and fire alarm systems. Contract Amount Plan Review Fee $1 to $40,000 $35 for the first $1,000 + $25 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $40,000 (minimum $25) $41,000 to $50,000 $1,010 for the first $40,000 + $8for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000 $51,000 to $100,000 $1,090 for the first $50,000 + $5 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to including $100,000 $101,000 to $25,000 $1,340 for the first $100,000 + $2 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $250,000 $251,001 and up $1,640.00 for the first $250,000 + $1 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof Flammable/Combustible Liquid Storage Tank Permit Installation (includes installation of above ground and underground storage tanks) • Temporary heat • 0 to 150 gallons • 151 to 500 gallons • 501 to 1,000 gallons • 1,001 to 5,000 gallons • 5,001 gallons or larger Removal (includes removal of above ground and underground storage tanks) • 0 to 150 gallons • 151 to 500 gallons • 501 to 1,000 gallons • 1,001 to 5,000 gallons • 5,001 gallons or larger Flammable/Combustible Liquid Storage Tank Plan Review Applies only to installation of new tanks Tents and Temporary Membrane Structures (Commercial uses) $80 $0 (no permit needed) $75/tank $125/tank $150/tank $200/tank $0 (no permit needed) $75/tank $1 00/tank $1 25/tank $1 50/tank $80/tank Tents greater than 400 sq. ft. (Total area of all tents does not exceed 15,000 sq. ft.) First tent Additional tents (up to a total of three) $50 $25/each Four or more tents where the total area of all tents does not exceed 15,000 sq. ft. $200 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 31 of 42 89 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov One tent exceeds 15,000 sq. ft. or total area of all tents exceeds 15,000 sq. ft. $200 + .02/sq. ft. over 15,000 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 32 of 42 90 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Electronic Processing Fee • $10,000 or less of valuation • $10,001 and up of valuation Burning Permit Fire Incident Report Fire Department Key box • Surface Mount • Flush Mount o If applicable sales tax is additional Hotel Inspection Fees • Triannual Inspection Fee — includes one follow-up inspection o Additional Per -Room Fee One to 18 units $5 19 to 35 units $6 36 to 100 units $7 100 or more units $8 • Additional Follow -Up Inspections Other Fees $15 .0015 x valuation, maximum $35,000 $40 $20 $281 $341 $435 $225 Re -inspection fee $85/hour or the hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is greater. (This cost shall include supervision, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employee involved.) Additional plan review required for changes, additions, revisions or re -submissions to original plans $85/hour or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is greater. (This cost shall include supervision, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employee involved.) Outside consultants for plan review and/or inspections Actual cost (including overhead and administrative costs) Fire -False Alarms False fire alarms user fee in excess of two in a calendaryear $400/alarm First two false alarms - $0 Third false alarm - $200 Fourth false alarm - $300 Five or more false alarms - $400 each alarm Supplies used for emergency responses Administrative Costs -Actions requiring payment for administrative costs may be billed to the applicant. Administrative costs may include but are not limited to the following: staff time, publishing costs, copying costs, printing costs, mailing and consulting cost, and consumables such as foam. The fee for each staff member is based on the rates below. Apparatus Stand-by Includes stand-by for events and contractual services Fee for each apparatus is based on FEMA's current Schedule of Equipment Rates. Standby rates are applied in 15 -minute increments with a minimum of one hour. A 1/2 hour will be added to the beginning and end of the standby time for preparation and clean-up. Additional personnel fees will be added based on the rates listed below. 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 33 of 42 91 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Apparatus response rate for billable incidents and disaster response. Fee for each apparatus is based on FEMA's current Schedule of Equipment Rates. Response rates are applied in 15 -minute increments for the total incident and clean-up time. Personnel costs will be added based on the rates listed below. Firefighter stand-by/Service $60 per hour per firefighter (calculated in 15 minute increments) Command Staff/Officer stand-by/service $95 per hour (Calculated in 15 minute increments) J 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 34 of 42 92 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Police Department Fees • Report copies (pages 1-4) • Report copies (pages 5-100) • Report copies (100 pages and over) • Audio recordings • Video recordings • Pawnshop billable transaction fee • Photographs • Photo discs • Golf cart license Hourly Rate for Contracted Police Services (three-hour minimum) • Hourly rate • July 3rd, July 4th, Thanksgiving, Black Friday, Christmas Eve and Christmas Storage of Forfeited Vehicles Towing and Impounding of Vehicles Towing and impounding is done by a private contractor having appropriate impounding facilities. • Storage of vehicles • Towing and impounding of vehicles Dog Licenses, Impounding Fees, etc. (City Code 130.03) • Dog licenses (Good for one year and includes access to dog park) • Lifetime dog license (Good for life of dog and includes dog park access. Vaccinations must remain current) • Duplicate license • First impoundment • Second impoundment • Third and successive impoundment within 12 -month period • Amount charged per day when confined to the pound No charge $.25/side/page Per request basis $10 $30 $1.50 $1 /photo $10 $20 $115 $140 $2/day ($550 maximum) Set by private contractor $25 $125 $5 $30 $50 $100 $15 In the case of an unlicensed dog or a dog for whom proof of a current rabies vaccination cannot be shown, there shall be an additional penalty of $10. Owner is responsible to furnish proof of license and/or rabies vaccination. • Large animal impoundment • Large animal board per day ■ Large animals are defined as animals other than household pets, e.g., horses, cows, sheep. Police — False Alarms • False alarm user fee in excess of two in a calendar year $100 $25 $150/alarm 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 35 of 42 93 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Parks and Recreation Fees COMMUNITY CENTER FEES Memberships (sales tax not included) Membership fees will increase Feb. 1st, 2026 Include ice skating, gyms, fitness center, classes, indoor playground and open swim. Monthly Memberships Residents Non -Residents Adult Monthly (18 to 59) $44 $56 $62 Youth Monthly (1 to 17) & Military $3'1 $37 $43 $52 Senior Monthly (60 and over) $311 $37 $45 $52 Military (active duty, must present military ID) $34 $37 $43 $52 Duel (two people residing at the same address) $53 $55 $70 $77 Household (two adults and tax dependents under the age of 21 residing at the same address) $63 $71 $81 $99 • Enrollment fee for monthly membership • Early cancellation fee (if prior to year commitment) $30 $50 Annual Memberships Residents Non -Residents Adult (18 to 59) 8 $410 3 $574 Youth (1 to 17) $310 9 $434 Senior (60 and over) & Military Senior (Ages 60+) $310 $434 Military (active duty, must present military ID) $310 $434 Adult + 1 Dual (two residing at the same address) $485 $515 x-69 $721 people 1 Family Membership (Immediate family residing at — $595 $615 $800 $861 same address) Household (two adults and tax dependents under the age of 21 residing at the same address) Annual memberships are non-refundable except for medical or military orders. In this case a $50 cancellation fee will be deducted from the refund. Admissions (sales tax not included) Resident Non -Resident $12 $16 $0 10.15 Adult (18 to 59) Daily Admission All Ages 8 $11 Daily Admission Children Under 12 months $0 Youth (1 to 17) $5�54 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 36 of 42 94 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Senior (60 and over) & Military 4 Walking track No charge No charge Skate daily admission No charge No Charge park Playground (The Lookout) Included with Community Center Membership • Children (under 1 Free) 9 $4 X54 $6 $6 CC Playtime Included with Community Center Membership $4 Other • Service charge for returned check (NSF) Upon receipt of an NSF check, no additional checks will be accepted by the presenter • Cancellation fee Room Rental (sales tax not Included) $30 $10 Rental fees for facilities are waived under terms of agreements with the Shakopee School District and city -affiliated sports associations. VCR/DVD player, coffee maker and overhead projector are available at no charge with rental at Community Center only. City -recognized service groups (see attached list on page 34) receive a 50% discount on room rentals. Shakopee Youth Sports Association may hold one board meeting per month in a group room for no rental fee. Community Center: Hourly Fee: Conference Room $25 Downstairs Party Room $45 Upstairs Multipurpose Room $45 Enigma Room $45 Community Room Sunday — Friday $85 — two hour minimum Community Room Saturday $110 —two hour minimum Downstairs multipurpose room $45 Community Center Birthday Party Package (up to 12 children and birthday child's parents) $150-$215 $10/additional child Ice Arena: Hourly Fee: Rinkside Room (Ice Arena) $45 SandVenture: Hourly Fee: The Cove (SandVenture) $45 — two hour minimum Room Rental Add Ons Flat Fee: Microphone/Speakers $25 Projector/Screen $25 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 37 of 42 95 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Deposits: Fee: Damage Deposit Community Room (no alcohol) $300 Damage Deposit Community Room (alcohol) $500 GYMNASIUM FEES Half Gym Rental Full Gym Rental Equipment Rental Volleyball $25 ICE ARENA FEES Ice Rental (sales tax not included) $55 per hour $110/hour $85 per hour Pickleball $25 Fall - Winter Prime (10/1 - 3/15) (2-11 p.m. Monday -Friday; 6 a.m.-11 p.m. Saturdays, Sundays, non -school days and holidays.) $245/hour $250/hour Fall — Winter Non -Prime (10/1 — 3/15) (11 p.m. -2 p.m. Monday -Friday; 11 p.m. -6 a.m. Saturdays and Sundays.) $195/hour $200/hour Spring/Summer (3/16 -9/30) $195/hour $200/hour Skating Services & Admissions *Included in Community Center membership* Resident Nonresident Open Skate Admission 4 $6 X54 $9 Skate Rental4 $6 X54 $9 Open Hockey $5,54 $6 X54 $9 Developmental Ice $10.15 $11 $10.15 $16 Ice Arena Advertising Annual Fee for Three Year Contract One Time Production Fee Locker Room Door $399 per year $275 Dasher Board $999 per year $460 Score Board $1499 per year $945 Players Box $1499 per year $945 Rink Double Doors $2499 per year $765 Premier Banner $1499 per year $640 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 38 of 42 96 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov SANDVENTURE ADMISSION FEES SEASON PASSES Resident Rates Nonresident Rates Season Pass Individual $110 $160 Season Pass Family $330 $480 Season Pass Senior/Military $94 $136 10 Visit Punch Card $105 $155 DAILY ADMISSIONS Resident Rates Nonresident Rates Daily Pass Individual $11 $16 Daily Pass Senior/Military Daily Pass Under 2 $0 $0 Daily Pass Individual TWILIGHT/Tot-Time $8 $12 Daily Pass Senior/Military TWILIGHT/Tot-Time S-6 $11 Aquatic Park Group Rental Fees • Public Group Rate (minimum of 20 people) • Private Group Rate (minimum of 200 people) • Group Deposit • SandVenture Birthday Party Package (12 children + 2 Adults) • Jeffrey Rogers Shelter Rental (2 hour minimum) RECREATION PROGRAM FEES $11/person $16/person $220 $200 $30/hour Recreation program participants are charged fees to cover costs associated with the program. These fees are designed to cover the direct cost of the program, including part-time salaries and supplies, as well as a portion of administrative overhead and direct supervisor costs. A small percentage is then added to the direct program costs to account for non -direct program costs. These fees vary depending on the program type, supplies costs, length of the program, etc. A $10 service fee will be charged for changes/class cancellations prior to the registration deadline. No refunds will be given after the registration deadline. Published fee does not included sales tax. Program and service fees are established based on the full cost of delivery, inclusive of both direct and indirect expenses, and in accordance with the department's adopted comprehensive revenue policy. Each program is classified within one of four pricing tiers, ranging from community benefit to profit center, which determines the proportion of costs to be recovered through participant fees. Resident rates are intentionally set lower than nonresident rates to acknowledge the financial contribution residents provide through local taxation. Nonresident program fees are established at 30 percent above the resident rate. Tier 4 programs operate as profit centers and are priced at market value to generate revenue in excess of total costs, which supports the sustainability and accessibility of community - based offerings. Tier Description Cost Recovery Target Subsidy Level 1 Community Benefit 25%-50% 75%-50% 2 Mixed Benefit 50%-75% 25%-50% 3 Individual Benefit 75%-100% Minimal Subsidy / Full Cost Recovery 4 Profit Centers 125%+ No Subsidy 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 39 of 42 97 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov PARK FACILITIES (sales tax not included) Facility users pay staffing costs and special event/tournament fees as required to prepare facilities for weekend or holiday events or where overtime is required during the week to accommodate special facility preparation requests. • $10 administration fee for cancellations • Requests for multiple -day field use will be based on the single -day rate. Three field rental minimum for weekend dragging. • Rental fees for some facilities are waived under terms of agreements with Shakopee School District and city -affiliated sports associations (based on availability). Staffing costs and special event/tournament fees are not waived. Additional charges may apply for additional facility requests beyond the facilities designated during the regular seasons. • Staffing costs noted above are not waived. • Regular park hours are 6 a.m. —10 p.m. General Fees • Damage deposit (for enclosed shelter and equipment only) Huber Park and Huber Stage Rentals (shelter & amphitheater) • All users Hourly Rental (two-hour minimum) • Day rentals (eight hours) • Chair rental (approximately 65 chairs available) • Audio system • Additional staff time Open Picnic Shelters and Gazebos Lions 1 & 2, Memorial 1 & 2 Huber Park Quarry Lake Picnic Shelter Quarry Lake Picnic Shelter & Gazebo $100 (due at reservation) $115/hour $500/day $75/day $75/day $30/hour $95/day $120/day $120/day $120/day $150/day Enclosed Picnic Shelters Green Meadows, Hiawatha, Holmes, Scenic Heights, Westminster, Riverside Fields, Southbridge $120/day $140/day Outdoor Athletic Facility Fees and Scheduling Priority Groups FEES Item Priority III Priority IV Priority V Priority VI Priority VII Baseball/Softball (per field per day) $65 $65 $100 Multipurpose Grass Field (per field per day) $100 $100 $150 Baseball/Softball w/LIGHTS (per field per day) $100 $100 $175 Multipurpose Grass Field w/LIGHTS (per field per day) $125 $125 $250 Tennis Court per day $65 $65 $100 Pickleball Courts per day/4 courts $65 $65 $100 Disc Golf Course per day $250 $250 $375 Xcel Energy Mountain Bike Park $250 $250 $375 Farmstead Bike Park $250 $250 $375 Schleper Stadium (April -Aug) Not Available Schleper Stadium(Sept-October) $500 $750 $750 $1000 Outdoor Hockey Rinks (with or without lights) $65 $65 $100 98 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 40 of 42 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Special Request/Usage Reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Department Special Event/Tournament Fees A special permit is required for these activities through the Parks and Department. • Restroom cleaning (contracted) • Empty garbage cans • Manual garbage pickup • A.M. field dragging (with four field minimum) • Additional dragging of fields • Overtime rate • Field or site setup • Picnic tables, cones, barricades, handicapped signage, extra garbage cans No charge with park/facility rental, but special permit fee may apply • Tanker truck service (often needed for large events offering food) $116/hour • Sweeper truck service (often needed for parades or larger events) $152/hour Notes: All fees are per site $93/cleaning $93/hour + hourly overtime labor rate $93 minimum $43/field/day $29/field/day $86/hour $53/hour Tournament must be at least two days to require the above services. If garbage was not picked up and put in containers, the city will bill a minimum of $85 plus the hourly time spent to clean the site. Additional supplies needed will be charged based on their cost (paint, chalk, etc.). Post Event Clean-up Fee Special Event/Tournament Permit holders will be responsible for leaving park facilities clean after event. If park facilities are not left clean and park maintenance staff are required to clean site, the city will charge a Post Event Clean up Fee. Site Fee Tahpah Park (4+ fields), 17th Avenue Sports Complex, $1000 Huber Park Lions Park Schleper Stadium Xcel Bike Park Farmstead Bike Park $500 Tahpah Park (1-4 fields) Westminster Park Muenchow Fields $100 Special Permit Any event or occurrence requiring a special permit will also require proof of liability insurance. No staff time needed or fees charged for event, etc. $50 (Bounce houses, petting zoos, vendors promoting services, free race/5K, etc.) Staff coordination needed, equipment request, etc. $100 (Free events requiring coordination use of park or facility, extra equipment needs, i.e., picnic tables, garbage containers, barricades, signage) 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 41 of 42 99 City of Shakopee 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 I City Clerk's Office 952-233-9300 I Fax: 952-233-3801 I www.ShakopeeMN.gov Events or activity charging fee (Any event charging fees or selling items or services, i.e., vendor sales, food/drink sales, race/5K charging an entry fee, parades etc.) $150 Entertainment Kits • Horseshoe/volleyball kit • Frisbee golf kit Youth Building Log Cabin Rental hours are Fri, Sat, Sun from 8 a.m. — 10 p.m. • Weekend/Full Day • Weekday rentals (two-hour minimum) • Additional staff CITY OF SHAKOPEE-RECOGNIZED SERVICE GROUPS $15 or no charge w/rental $15 or no charge w/rental $300 key/damage deposit on all rentals $400 $50/hour $30/hour For Community Ccntcr rooms and Youth Building rcntals. These community -based service organizations support recreation and leisure opportunities in Shakopee. To support their efforts, the Parks and Recreation Department applies a 50% reduction to rental rates for the Community Center Rooms (excluding the Community Room itself) and the Log Cabin. • 4-H • Alcoholics Anonymous (current Tuesday and Wednesday groups ONLY) • Diversity Alliance • Lions Club • Lioness Club • Relay For Life • Girl Scouts • Rotary Club • Boy Scouts • Heritage Society • Deer Hunters Association (River Valley Chapter) • Jaycees • VFW • American Legion • Scott County (excluding Community Room) • Shakopee Area Catholic School • AARP (tax preparation) • American Red Cross (blood drive) • FISH (Families and Individuals Sharing Hope) Those organizations listed as recognized service groups on the City of Shakopee's published fee schedule h .sh-I<• •-mn.••v • •v-rnm-nt m. •r-cit -council fees), are permitted to conduct fund-raising activities on -site (outside — NOT within the facilities) with coordination/scheduling with the Recreation Facilities Manager (Troy Ciernia, tciernia@shakopeemn.gov, 952-233-9530) Those organizations listed as recognized service groups on the City of Shakopee's published fee schedule (https://www.shakopeemn.gov/government/mayor-city-council/fees), will have City tournament fees waived for annual community tournaments with coordination/scheduling with the Parks and Services Manager (Sherry Dvorak, sdvorak@shakopeemn.gov, 952-233-9509) 2026 City of Shakopee Fee Schedule - Updated 01/06/2026 Page 42 of 42 100 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.d January 6, 2026 Resolution R2026-007, Designating the City's Official Newspaper Rick Parsons Action to be considered: Approve Resolution R2026-007, designating the New Prague Times as the City's official newspaper, and designating the City's website as the official publication for transportation project notices, advertisements, and bids Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: Minnesota State Statute (MN Stats. Ch. 331A) requires the city to, annually, designate an official newspaper to publish certain matters over the course of the year. This includes council minutes, ordinances, resolutions when required by law, notices of public hearings on planning matters, public improvement projects and advertisement for bids, and other notices as required by law. To qualify as an official newspaper, a newspaper must meet certain qualifications as outlined in Minnesota State Statute 331A.02. General qualifications are as follows: • Must be printed in English • Distributed at least twice a month • Be of general circulation in the area to which public notice is directed, or where there is a reasonable likelihood that the person to whom it is directed will become aware of the notice • Have its office located in either the city, the county in which the city resides, or a neighboring county • File a copy of each issue with the State Historical Society Under this criteria, the Minnesota Star Tribune and the New Prague Times (the city's current newspaper) are the only newspapers that qualify. Both newspapers were contacted for pricing and New Prague Times was more cost effective. Staff recommends the New Prague Times be designated as the city's official newspaper for 2026. Legislative changes at the state level may enable the city to use the city website or other online resources to publish notices at some point in the future, but under current state 101 law, the city is required to continue to publish notices through an official newspaper. In addition, state statute (MN Stats. Ch. 331A.12) allows the designation of a city's website as the official publication for transportation projects. Publication on the website may be used in place of any other required form of publication. Once the website is designated as the official publication, to comply with state statute, the city will publish notification in a qualified newspaper and on the website, notice that the city will publish any future transportation project notices, advertisements, and bids on the city website. All notices under this section must be posted in substantially the same format and for the same period of time as required for publication in an official newspaper, and ensure that a permanent record of publication is maintained in a form accessible by the public. Recommendation: Approve Resolution R2026-007. Budget Impact: There is no increase in publication fees from 2025 to 2026; publication fees in 2026 remain $14.00 per column inch. Attachments: Resolution R2026-007 - Designating Official Newspaper 102 RESOLUTION R2026-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ESTABLISHING THE NEW PRAGUE TIMES AS THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE IN 2026, AND DESIGNATING THE CITY WEBSITE AS THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION FOR 2026 TRANSPORTATION PROJECT NOTICES AND BIDS WHEREAS, each year the City of Shakopee is required to establish an official newspaper to publish city notices; and WHEREAS, official notices include ordinances, council minutes, resolutions when required by law, public hearing notices on planning matters, public improvement projects and advertisement bids, and other matters as required by law; and WHEREAS, the New Prague Times currently meets the qualifications to serve as the city's official newspaper; and WHEREAS, each year the City of Shakopee is also required to designate an official publication for transportation project notices and bids; and WHEREAS, the city's official website may be established as the official publication for transportation project notices, advertisements, and bids. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: that the New Prague Times is designated as the City of Shakopee's official newspaper, and the city website is designated as the official publication for transportation project notices, advertisements, and bids. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 6th day of January, 2026. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Prepared by: City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 103 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.e January 6, 2026 2026 Tree Pruning Contract Extension Kirby Templin, Water Resources - Environmental Manager Alex Jordan, City Engineer Action to be considered: Approve a contract with Carr's Tree Service in the amount of $61.61 per hour for the 2026 Tree Pruning project. Motion Type: Approve Background: The city hired Carr's Tree Service for tree pruning in 2025. That contract agreement has a provision to extend the contract for up to two additional years. Based on the quote and the satisfactory of work performed in 2025, it is recommended to extend the pruning contract with Carr's Tree Service for 2026. Carr's Tree Service from Ottertail, MN with many satellite locations based around central Minnesota, has the capacity and experience for the work and is prepared to begin the work in January 2026. The 2026 hourly rate is $61.61 which is the 2025 rate ($59.82 per hour) adjusted by 3.0%. The proposed rate adjustment is within the allowable increase per the contract to account for inflation. See attached for the 2025 quote tabulation. It should be noted that one of the city's contract requirements prescribes that only an ISA Certified Arborist may perform pruning and that all ANSI standards shall be met while performing work. Additionally, the contractor is required to notify adjacent property owners of the activity in their area a minimum of 48 hours in advance, with a letter provided by city staff. The trees proposed to be pruned in 2026 include the mature trees, young trees and general right-of-way clearance in Zone F. The pruning scope also includes the young trees in Zone C, and the mature and young trees at the River City Centre (see attached maps). Recommendation: Approve the contract. 104 Budget Impact: $65,000 is budgeted for the 2026 Tree Pruning project within the Parks Maintenance Operating Budget. Attachments: Figure - Zone F Area 1 Figure - Zone F Area 2 Figure - Zone C Figure - River City Centre 2026 Contract Extension 2025 Quote Tabulation.pdf 105 N - Pruning Zone (Young Trees Only) Zone B Zone C Zone D,E Zone F Zone A Zone B Zone C Zone D w . O 0 Ni Zone F 8 auoZ V @uoZ Zone C 0 O O 0 N QJ v p, i N — CI- Q w Q 4J O CU Pc N N 0o 4J O O N U QJ O O N 0 Q1 O O N w N O O N 4J O O N Q N O 0000000 N Ca CU O N U CU O N 4J O N w O O N . O N Q CU O N fts 0 c -I N N N N N N N M N N N N i!1 N N 0 N N , N N 00 N N Ol N N 0 M N r -I M N N M N M M N Pruning Zone (Young Trees Only) Zone B Zone C Zone D, E Zone F V @UOZ Zone B Zone C Zone D w a) c 0 NV Zone F Zone A Zone B Zone C Zone D Pruning Zone (All Trees) w CU O D N Zone F, A Zone B U a) C ❑ N as C p N w QJ O O N w U) O O N Zone A Zone B Zone C Zone D Zone E w Cu O O N Zone A O .-1 N M LO l0 n 00 00 0 +-I N M N N N N N N N N N N M M MM 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO 0 00 0 NJ 0 r4 0 0 NI 0 r\I �r r 'ir s- I it. I M •• •iii j w _ o • - iM • w• r it1.3.431111; w •iwli• N� • • •• • ••i ■ 1S 51M3� lit 8 if% i ....rd vulr.• S. „far--; •ir. .....6"*"s w • a i� *iN••� ~• 1S 0310100i sn • • • i ....• o• I. •M• • ••i •• ...I.I r • j • i • i • • • is 000MIV it • 1S 111005 • adJdV • CO CITY OF SHAKOPEE FOR 2026 TREE PRUNING OFFICIAL QUOTE FORM Quote Price as specified in PREPERATION OF QUOTES on page 1 Contractor Tree Care Registry Number: 20106532 1 2 3 Total Price for Crew ($) Number of Crewmembers per Crew Amount per working hour ($) 1=2=3 $184.83 3 $61.61 Number of crewmembers/crew Number of Certified Arborists/Crew 3 1 Lists Certified Arborists to work on this contract. Name Cert. Number Expiration Date Years Certified Jim Corrow MN -5018A 8/2027 2 Robert Virchow MN -5016A 8/2027 2 Attach additional sheet if needed. List main contact for this contract. Name Cell Phone Office Phone Email Jeremy Lafferty 952-807-7813 jlafferty@carrstreeservice.com Large Equipment to be used: B00111 Truck, Claw Truck, Chipper, Chipper Truck References from two municipal pruning contracts of similar scope within last 5 years: City Contact Name Phone Number Burnsville Brian Ulvin 952-895-4508 Farmington Ben Humlie 651-280-6842 Quote Information Date of Quote Contractor Address Owner/President 12-29-2025 P.O. Box 250 Otte rta i I , MN 56571 Jake Carr Contractor Name Authorizing Signature Carr's Tree Service 63/4N;v, Va-daeo Contractor is (check one): Individual _ City of Shakopee — Quotation Form 2026 Tree Pruning Partnership Corporation X Quotation Form - Page 1 of 1 110 CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into this 6 day of January , 2025 by and between Carr's Tree Service, hereinafter called "Contractor", and the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "City." WITNESSETH: That Whereas, the Contractor has become the lowest responsible bidder for furnishing the supervision, labor, tools, equipment, materials and supplies and for constructing the following City improvements: 2026 TREE PRUNING NOW THEREFORE, the parties to this contract agree to the following: 1. Manner for Completion. The Contractor, at his own proper cost and expense, shall perform all work and furnish all supervision (needed beyond that provided by the City Engineer), labor, material, tools, supplies, machinery and other equipment necessary for the construction of the 2025 TREE PRUNING for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, in a workmanlike and substantial manner, as outlined in the Request For Quotation (RFQ). 2. Due Diligence. The maintenance of a rate of progress in the work which will result in its completion in a reasonable time, is an essential feature of this Contract, and the Contractor agrees to proceed with all due diligence and care, at all times to take all precautions to insure the time of completion as defined in this Contract. The Contractor shall fully complete the work called for under the Contract in accordance with the RFQ. 3. Payment. The City will pay the Contractor those prices stipulated in the Contractor's Quotation, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Contract, which shall constitute full and complete compensation for the contractor's work provided hereunder. The parties specifically agree and understand and the Contractor specifically waives any claim for additional compensation for any changed condition whether arising out of a physical condition at the site of an unusual nature, differing materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character and at the location provided for in the Contract or arising as a result of any force majeur. 4. Contractor's Responsibility for Subcontractors. It is further agreed that Contractor shall be as fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as Contractor is for the acts and omissions of persons it directly employs. Contractor shall cause appropriate provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts relating to this work, to bind all subcontractors to Contractor by all the terms herein set forth, insofar as applicable to the work of subcontractors and to give Contractor the same power regarding termination of any subcontract as the City may exercise over Contractor under any provisions of this contract. Nothing contained in this Contract shall create any contractual relation between the subcontractor and the City or between any subcontractors. City of Shakopee — Contract 2026 TREE PRUNING Contract - Page 1 of 2 111 5. Payment to Subcontractors. The Contractor shall pay any subcontractor within ten days of receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. If the Contractor fails to pay within ten days, the Contractor shall pay the subcontractor interest at the rate of one and one-half percent per month or part of month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor, in accordance with Minn. State. Sec. 471.425, Subd. 4a. 6. City Instructions. The City may declare the contract forfeited, should the Contractor persistently disregard instructions of the City or fail to observe or perform any provisions of this Contract. 9. Duplicate Originals. This Contract shall be executed in two copies; one (1) copy being retained by the City, one (1) to be delivered to the Contractor. 10. Nondiscrimination. The Contractor agrees in the performance of this Contract not to discriminate on the ground or because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation or age, against any employee of Contractor or applicant for employment, and shall include a similar provision in all sub- contracts let or awarded hereunder 11. Jurisdiction. This agreement and every question arising hereunder shall be construed or determined according to the laws of the State of Minnesota. CONTRACTOR CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA arm l'payo-ca By By Chris Virchow/ General Manager Matt Lehman/Mayor By By William H. Reynolds/City Administrator City of Shakopee — Contract 2026 TREE PRUNING Contract - Page 2 of 2 112 Quotation Results 2025 Tree Pruning November 20th, 2024 City of Shakopee Bidder Amount Carr's Tree Service $ 59.82 Ostvig Tree, Inc. $ 104.90 Davey $ 135.00 Precision Landscape and Tree $ 150.00 113 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.f January 6, 2026 Approve a Contract for the 2026 Ash Tree Removal Project Kirby Templin, Water Resources - Environmental Manager Alex Jordan, City Engineer Action to be considered: Approve a Contract with Shadywood Tree Experts, in the amount of $20,500 for the 2026 Ash Tree Removal project. Motion Type: Approve Background: Quotes were solicited and opened for the 2026 Ash Tree Removal project on December 17th, 2025. Eleven quotes were received. Ten quotes were complete and one quote was rejected due to an incomplete quote form. Shadywood Tree Experts, is the low bidder in the amount of $20,500 (see attached quote tabulations). Shadywood Tree Experts has the capacity and experience for the project and is deemed a responsible bidder. It should be noted that one of the city's contract requirements prescribes that an ISA Certified Arborist be onsite at all times during tree removal. Additionally, the contractor is required to notify adjacent property owners of the activity in their area a minimum of 48 hours in advance, with a letter provided by city staff. There are 31 ash trees planned for removal in 2026 which are depicted on the attached figure. Recommendation: Approve the contract. Budget Impact: $20,500 is budgeted for the 2026 Ash Tree Removal project. Funding for the project is from the Parks Maintenance Operating Budget. Attachments: Figure Quote Tabulation 114 Ash Tree Removal 2026 - Contract 115 Quotation Results 2026 Ash Tree Removal December 17th, 2025 City of Shakopee Bidder Amount Shadywood Tree Experts $ 20,500.00 Castle Rock Contracting & Tree Service, LLC $ 25,400.00 Tree Trust $ 26,995.00 Pro Tree $ 28,216.40 Precision Landscape and Tree, Inc. $ 28,870.00 Vineland Tree Care $ 32,175.00 Birch Tree Care $ 34,770.00 SavATree, LLC $ 36,950.85 The Davey Tree Expert Company $ 44,645.00 Ostvig Tree, Inc. $ 106,975.00 117 QUOTATION FORM ASH TREE REMOVALS COMPANY NAME: Shadywood Tree Experts ADDRESS: 402 11th Ave S Hopkins, MN TELEPHONE: 952-933-0614 Office / Cell 562-760-2251 QUOTATIONS ARE DUE BY 10:00 A.M., LOCAL TIME, DECEMBER 17, 2025. To: Lindsey Vugteveen, Water Resources -Environmental Technician 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Email: lvugteveen@shakopeemn.gov ZIP 55343 The undersigned, as bidder, hereby proposes and agrees to enter into a contract with the City of Shakopee to supply all labor, materials, and equipment necessary to complete Ash Tree Removals, all in accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by the City of Shakopee and in strict accordance with the unit prices herewith. The final amounts of the contract shall be determined by multiplying the final measured quantities as authorized and actually furnished and installed in the manner described in the specifications, by the unit stated in this proposal form. The Contractor will not be entitled to any compensation on any items other than those listed on this proposal form. The bidder must bid each item. The contract award will be based upon the low total bid amount. In the event the unit prices extended do not equal the total bid, the unit prices shall govern to become the total bid. The Contract is anticipated to be awarded a contractor by City Council on January 6th, 2026. City of Shakopee — Quotation Form 2026 ASH TREE REMOVALS Quotation Form - Page 1 of 5 118 CITY OF SHAKOPEE 2026 ASH TREE REMOVAL OFFICIAL QUOTE FORM Quote Price as specified in PREPERATION OF QUOTES on page 1 The bidder must bid each item. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Item DBH CLASS DIAMETER (Inches) ESTIMATED QUANTITY (# of Trees) TREE REMOVAL COST (Each) STUMP (Each) TOTAL UNIT COST 4 + 5 (Each) TOTAL TOTAL COST 3 x 6 1 0-6.0 1 200 40 240 240 2 6.1-7.9 0 200 55 255 0 3 8.0-9.9 0 300 65 365 0 4 10.0-11.9 2 370 70 440 880 5 12.0-13.9 5 420 85 505 2525 6 14.0-15.9 8 475 95 570 4560 7 16.0-17.9 6 550 110 660 3960 8 18.0-19.9 4 625 125 750 3000 9 20.0-21.9 0 700 135 835 0 10 22.0-23.9 1 750 145 895 895 11 24.0-25.9 1 830 160 990 990 12 26.0-27.9 1 880 170 1050 1050 13 28.0-29.9 1 900 185 1085 1085 14 30.0-31.9 0 1000 200 1200 0 15 32.0-33.9 1 1100 215 1315 1315 16 34.0-35.9 0 1250 225 1475 0 17 36.0-37.9 0 1500 250 1750 0 18 38.0-39.9 0 1800 275 2075 0 19 40.0-41.9 0 2100 300 2400 0 20 42.0-43.9 0 2300 325 2625 0 21 44.0-45.9 0 2650 375 3025 0 22 46.0+ 0 3200 400 3600 0 Total Trees 31 Total Bid Amount 20500.00 Notes: 1. includes removing chips and backfill with black dirt and seed/restore per specification City of Shakopee — Quotation Form 2026 ASH TREE REMOVALS Quotation Form - Page 2 of 5 119 CITY OF SHAKOPEE 2026 ASH TREE REMOVAL OFFICIAL QUOTE FORM Contractor Tree Care Registry Number: 20107439 Lists Certified Arborists to work on this contract. Name Cert. Number Expiration Date Years Certified Jim Perryman MN #4588A 1/23/26 11 Keith Curtis MN -4130A 6/30/27 19 Jake Nitz WI -0761A 6/20/27 19 Attach additional sheet if needed. List main contact for this contract. Name Cell Phone Office Phone Email Mike Harmon 562-760-2251 952-933-0614 mike.harmon@shadywoodtreeo Lar g e E ui ment to be used: Clam truck/Bucket/chip truck q p References from two municir al tree removal contracts of similar score within last 5 years: City Contact Name Phone Number Minnetonka Josh Obermeyer 612-270-1476 St Louis Park Mike Bahe 952-228-7584 Quote Information Date of Quote Contractor Address Owner/President 12/11/25 402 11th Ave S Hopkins MN 55343 Mike Harmon Contractor Name Authorizing Signature Shadywood Tree Experts oZ,'k ka✓UnOGu Contractor is (check one): Individual _ City of Shakopee — Quotation Form 2026 ASH TREE REMOVALS Partnership Corporation X xperts.com Quotation Form - Page 3 of 5 1 20 The undersigned agrees as follows: 1. The City of Shakopee, Minnesota, reserves the right to reject any and all bids, to waive any minor irregularities in bidding, and/or to accept the bid or bids which best serve the interest of the City of Shakopee. 2. If this quotation is accepted, bidder will enter into a contract and furnish insurance certificate(s) within ten (10) days after bidder's quote is accepted. Bidder agrees to commence work as soon as possible after acceptance and to complete all work on or before the completion date, subject to the provisions of the contract documents. Respectfully Submitted, City of Shakopee — Quotation Form 2026 ASH TREE REMOVALS Firm: Shadywood Tree Experts (wk a≥(wt. By: (Signature of Bidder) Title: Co -Owner Mike Harmon (Name) 402 11th Ave S (Address) Hopkins MN (City and State) 12-11-25 DATE: Quotation Form - Page 4 of 5 121 STATE OF MINNESOTA - RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATE A responsible contractor is defined in Minnesota Statutes §16C.285, subdivision 3. Any prime contractor or subcontractor who does not meet the minimum criteria under Minnesota Statutes §16C.285, subdivision 3, or who fails to verify that it meets those criteria, is not a responsible contractor and is not eligible to be awarded a construction contract for the project or to perform work on the project. A false statement under oath verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria shall render the prime contractor or subcontractor that makes the false statement ineligible to be awarded a construction contract for the project and may result in termination of a contract awarded to a prime contractor or subcontractor that makes a false statement. A prime contractor shall submit to the contracting authority prior to execution of the contract, copies of the signed verifications of compliance from all subcontractors of any tier pursuant to subdivision 3, clause 7. Mike Harmon By signing this statement, I, (typed or printed name), Co -Owner (title) certify that I am an owner or officer of the company and do verify under oath that my company is in compliance with each of the minimum criteria listed in the law. Shadywppd Tree Experts (name of the person, partnership or corporation submitting this proposal) 402 11th Ave S Hopkins, MN 55343 (business address) Signed: kah,i,toru 12/11/25 (bidder or authorized representative) Date City of Shakopee — Quotation Form 2026 ASH TREE REMOVALS Quotation Form - Page 5 of 5 122 CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into this 23rd day of December , 2025 by and between Shadywood Tree Experts, hereinafter called "Contractor", and the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "City." WITNESSETH: That Whereas, the Contractor has become the lowest responsible bidder for furnishing the supervision, labor, tools, equipment, materials and supplies and for constructing the following City improvements: 2026 ASH TREE REMOVALS NOW THEREFORE, the parties to this contract agree to the following: 1. Manner for Completion. The Contractor, at his own proper cost and expense, shall perform all work and furnish all supervision (needed beyond that provided by the City Engineer), labor, material, tools, supplies, machinery and other equipment necessary for the construction of the 2025 ASH TREE REMOVALS for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, in a workmanlike and substantial manner, as outlined in the Request For Quotation (RFQ). 2. Due Diligence. The maintenance of a rate of progress in the work which will result in its completion in a reasonable time, is an essential feature of this Contract, and the Contractor agrees to proceed with all due diligence and care, at all times to take all precautions to insure the time of completion as defined in this Contract. The Contractor shall fully complete the work called for under the Contract in accordance with the RFQ. 3. Payment. The City will pay the Contractor those prices stipulated in the Contractor's Quotation, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Contract, which shall constitute full and complete compensation for the contractor's work provided hereunder. The parties specifically agree and understand and the Contractor specifically waives any claim for additional compensation for any changed condition whether arising out of a physical condition at the site of an unusual nature, differing materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character and at the location provided for in the Contract or arising as a result of any force majeur. 4. Contractor's Responsibility for Subcontractors. It is further agreed that Contractor shall be as fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as Contractor is for the acts and omissions of persons it directly employs. Contractor shall cause appropriate provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts relating to this work, to bind all subcontractors to Contractor by all the terms herein set forth, insofar as applicable to the work of subcontractors and to give Contractor the same power regarding termination of any subcontract as the City may exercise over Contractor under any provisions of this contract. Nothing contained in this Contract shall create any contractual relation between the subcontractor and the City or between any subcontractors. City of Shakopee — Contract 2026 ASH TREE REMOVALS Contract - Page 1 of 2 123 5. Payment to Subcontractors. The Contractor shall pay any subcontractor within ten days of receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. If the Contractor fails to pay within ten days, the Contractor shall pay the subcontractor interest at the rate of one and one-half percent per month or part of month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor, in accordance with Minn. State. Sec. 471.425, Subd. 4a. 6. Prevailing Wages. Prevailing wage rates do not apply to this project. 7. City Instructions. The City may declare the contract forfeited, should the Contractor persistently disregard instructions of the City or fail to observe or perform any provisions of this Contract. 8. Duplicate Originals. This Contract shall be executed in two copies; one (1) copy being retained by the City, one (1) to be delivered to the Contractor. 9. Nondiscrimination. The Contractor agrees in the performance of this Contract not to discriminate on the ground or because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation or age, against any employee of Contractor or applicant for employment, and shall include a similar provision in all sub- contracts let or awarded hereunder 10. Jurisdiction. This agreement and every question arising hereunder shall be construed or determined according to the laws of the State of Minnesota. CONTRACTOR CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA By (� £ct4tiw By Matt Lehman/Mayor Mike Harmon/Co-Owner By By William H. Reynolds/City Administrator City of Shakopee — Contract 2026 ASH TREE REMOVALS Contract - Page 2 of 2 124 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.g January 6, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date for Street Reconstruction Plan Nate Reinhardt, Finance Director Action to be considered: Adopt Resolution 2026-006 Motion Type: Two -Thirds Vote Background: During the 2026 budget process and review of the 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan staff and Council discussed the increasing funding gap for existing street improvements. Costs of maintaining existing city streets have increased significantly over the past decade. The annual costs of overlays and reconstruction projects in the 2021-2025 CIP were $4.2 million. That cost has nearly doubled in the 2026-2030 CIP to an annual cost of $7.7 million. Funding sources (capital improvement levy, special assessments, municipal state aid and franchise fees) have remained relatively flat in comparison. An increase of $300,000 to the capital improvement levy was included in the 2026 budget to prevent the annual gap from increasing further. The City has utilized one-time transfers from the General Fund and bond proceeds in the past to support these projects and anticipates continuing to do so in the future. Staff is recommending funding these improvements through the use of bonds. The statutory borrowing authority for General Obligation Street Reconstruction Bonds is MN Statutes 475.58, which requires the City to hold a public hearing and adopt a Street Reconstruction Plan. In order to retain the most flexibility possible (in terms of timing and dollars amounts), staff is recommending that the City Council proactively adopt a Street Reconstruction Plan and a resolution declaring the official intent of the city to reimburse certain expenditures from the proceeds of bonds to be issued by the city. This would not require the city to move forward with any of the projects listed or issue bonds, which would require their own individual City Council approval. However, it does provide the City the authority to issue bonds at a future date to reimburse the street project expenditures identified in the plan. The plan includes all street reconstruction and overlay projects identified in the capital improvement plan over the next five years, however the plan sets a maximum bond sale amount of $12 million (not the full amount 125 identified in the plan). If the Street Reconstruction Plan is approved, staff will prepare a preliminary official statement in October and request City Council to authorize a bond sale on November 17, 2026. A bond ratings call would the occur in the weeks following with the award of the bond sale at the City Council meeting on December 15, 2026. Recommendation: Motion to Adopt Resolution 2026-006 Setting A Public Hearing on the Proposal to Adopt a Street Reconstruction Plan and Intent to Issue General Obligation Street Reconstruction Bonds. Budget Impact: Projects were included in the City's 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan. A Street Reconstruction Plan is a requirement to issue general obligation street reconstruction bonds. A bond issue for the projects would allow the City to spread out the costs and funding of these projects over a period of ten years. A significantly larger property tax increase for 2027 will be required if a bond sale is not approved. The Street Reconstruction Plan is being presented early in 2026, which will allow staff to begin planning for a bond sale and coordinate with the 2027 budget process. Attachments: Resolution Setting Public Hearing for Street Reconstruction Plan.doc Street Reconstruction Plan 2026-2030 (1-6-2026).pdf Shakopee Notice of Public Hearing Street Reconstruction Plan.DOCX Schedule of Events.docx 126 CITY OF SHAKOPEE RESOLUTION NO. R2026-006 RESOLUTION CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSAL TO ADOPT A STREET RECONSTRUCTION PLAN AND INTENT TO ISSUE GENERAL OBLIGATION STREET RECONSTRUCTION BONDS WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the "City"), has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to declare official intent to reimburse certain expenditures from the proceeds of general obligation street reconstruction bonds pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.58, subdivision 3b, as amended (the "Act"), to finance the cost of street reconstruction projects, as described in the proposed street reconstruction plan described below, a copy of which is on file in the City Finance Director's office; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the City is authorized to issue and sell general obligation street reconstruction bonds for street reconstruction under the circumstances and within limitations set forth in the Act. The Act provides the street reconstruction plan may be financed with general obligation street reconstruction bonds, following adoption of a street reconstruction plan, after a public hearing on the street reconstruction plan and on the issuance of general obligation street reconstructions bonds and other proceedings conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Act; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the City has prepared a five year street reconstruction plan for calendar years 2026 through 2030 (the "Plan"), which describes the streets to be reconstructed and the estimated costs, to determine the funding strategy for street reconstruction projects; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, that: 1. Public Hearing. The City Council hereby determines to call and to hold a public hearing on the Plan and the declaration of official intent to reimburse certain expenditures from the proceeds of general obligation street reconstruction bonds thereunder at a meeting of the City Council to be held on February 3, 2026, the public hearing shall commence at 7:00 p.m. 2. Publication. The staff of the City is hereby authorized and directed to cause the Notice of Public Hearing which is attached to this Resolution to be published in the City's official newspaper not less than 10 days nor more than 28 days prior to the scheduled public hearing date. Approved by the City Council of the City of Shakopee this 6th day of January 2026. 127 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 2 128 CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 5 -YEAR STREET RECONSTRUCTION PLAN January 6, 2026 A. Background The City has completed a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) covering the period of 2026 through 2030 and has determined a funding deficiency exists for the current programmed street improvement projects. In 2022 (the last time a bond was issued by the City) the City utilized Minnesota Statutes 429 for special assessment improvement bonds when at least 20% of the project costs are being assessed. When this threshold can't be met, the City has to look to other statutes to finance the projects. In 2002, amended in 2013 and 2021, the Minnesota State Legislature passed into law a bill which allows the City to issue bonds for a street reconstruction program. In order to provide financing for a portion of the cost of the street reconstruction project described herein, the City has determined to adopt this plan in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.58, subd. 3b (the "Act"). B. Five -Year Street Reconstruction Plan Following is a description of the projects and the estimated cost covering the five-year period from 2026 through 2030. Project 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2026 Pavement Reconstruction $2,745,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - 2026 Mill and Overlay 2,603,000 - - - - 2027 Pavement Reconstruction 400,000 5,050,000 - - - 2027 Mill and Overlay - 1,125,000 - - - 2028 Pavement Reconstruction 100,000- 350,000 4,600,000 - - 2028 Mill and Overlay - - 2,950,000 - - 2029 Pavement Reconstruction - - 350,000 4,400,000 - 2029 Mill and Overlay - - - 1,125,000 - 2030 Pavement Reconstruction - - - 450,000 6,700,000 2030 Mill and Overlay - - - - 650,000 Total $5,848,000 $6,525,000 $7,900,000 $5,975,000 $7,350,000 Total 5 -year estimated cost: $33,598,000 Note: Cost estimates include engineering and construction costs. C. General Obligation Street Reconstruction Plan Bonds The City may issue general obligation bonds pursuant to the Act to finance any street reconstruction costs described in this plan. The City currently plans to issue bonds under the Act for a portion of the City's share of annual pavement reconstruction and mill and overlay costs. The City expects to receive bids and consider award for each project in the Spring of each year. City Council has determined to Page 1 129 set a maximum principal amount of $12 million of bonds to be issued under MN States 475.58. Ther City reserves the right to move annual projects as needed and allocate more or less funding to the projects as final costs are known. Having projects listed does not mean the City has to issue bonds for the project. It just provides a mechanism for the City to fund the projects through the issuance of bonds if they choose. The City Council expects to make a final decision on the principal of the street project borrowing in November/December of 2026 after determining current year project costs and reviewing the overall financial plan. The City Council resolution adopting the Street Reconstruction Plan includes a declaration of official intent, required under Internal Revenue Services Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2, to reimburse project costs from the proceeds of bonds. Which will allow the city to reimburse funds spent in 2026 on projects listed in the plan. A draft calendar of events and a preliminary debt service schedule have been included. Staff will prepare a preliminary official statement and updated preliminary debt service schedule and ask for City Council authorization of bond sale at the City Council meeting on November 17, 2026. If a bond sale is authorized on November 17, 2026, the final official statement will be issued at a bond ratings call would occur in the subsequent weeks. The bonds would be placed out for bid and City Council would consider the award of bonds on December 15, 2026. D. Required Process As required by Statute, the city must hold a public hearing for input on the street reconstruction plan. Notice of the hearing must be published in the official newspaper of the city at least 10 days, but not more than 28 days prior to the date of the public hearing. In addition, the council must approve the street reconstruction plan and issuance of street reconstruction bonds by a two- thirds majority vote of its membership present at the meeting following the public hearing. The approval is subject to a reverse referendum. If a petition requesting a vote on the issuance of bonds bearing the signatures of at least 5 percent of the votes cast in the last municipal general election is filed with the municipal clerk within 30 days after the public hearing, a referendum vote on the issuance of the bonds shall be required to authorize the issuance. 130 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name CIF -26-001 2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction Total Project Cost $2,885,000 Department Capital Improvements Fund Category Street Reconstruction Status Active Fund Capital Improvement Fund Contact City Engineer Type Improvement Priority 1 - Have to do Useful Life 25 years Description This project is for the full depth reconstruction of the bituminous roadway for Crossings Boulevard from Country Road 18 to approximately 710 feet west of Foothill Trail and 12th Avenue from east of County Road 83 to Valley Park Drive. With this project, 12th Avenue will be converted from a 4 -lane to a 3 -lane section as recommended by a transportation study that was completed in 2019. Additionally, the intersection of 12th Avenue and Valley Park Drive will be evaluated for proper traffic control and configuration. Utility, curb and gutter repairs and improvements will be evaluated and included with this project. Justification This is a continuation of the City's Pavement Preservation Program to maintain existing infrastructure. Prior 140,000 Prior Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Engineering/Administration 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2,580,000 165,000 140,000 Funding Sources Capital Improvement Fund Special Assessments Sanitary Sewer Fund Total 2,745,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2,580,000 165,000 2,745,000 Cost Sharing, SPUC Storm Drainage Fund Tota I 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 2,100,000 0 0 0 0 2,100,000 530,000 0 0 0 0 530,000 55,000 0 0 0 0 55,000 45,000 0 0 0 0 45,000 15,000 0 0 0 0 15,000 2,745,000 0 0 0 0 2,745,000 Budget Impact Required ADA improvements are generally unfunded mandates to improve accessibility and to minimize liability. Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 131 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name CIF -26-001 2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction Contact Department City Engineer Capital Improvements Fund Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 132 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name CIF -26-002 Annual Bituminous Mill and Overlay Total Project Cost $11,433,000 Department Capital Improvements Fund Category Street Paving Status Active Accounting Code 5972/6972-2025 Contact City Engineer Type Improvement Priority 1 - Have to do Useful Life 15 years Fund Capital Improvement Fund Description The 2026 project includes the rehabilitation of the bituminous asphalt surface of the following streets: the River Valley Estates neighborhood, the Park Meadows neighborhood, Thrush Street between Omega Drive and Archer Street, and downtown areas between 4th and 6th Avenues bounded by Webster St and Scott St. The rehabilitation work includes milling the pavement surface, crack sealing, full depth spot repair and patching, spot curb and gutter repair, spot sidewalk repair, upgrading sidewalk/trail pedestrian curb ramp facilities and a bituminous asphalt pavement overlay. Justification This is a continuation of the City's Pavement Preservation Program to maintain existing infrastructure. The City must reconstruct pedestrian ramp facilities to comply with its ADA Transition plan adopted in 2018, increasing the cost of these projects compared to previous years' projects. Prior Expenditures 2,980,000 Construction/Maintenance Engineering/Administration Prior 2,980,000 Funding Sources Capital Improvement Fund Sanitary Sewer Fund Storm Drainage Fund 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 2,330,000 1,014,000 2,660,000 1,015,000 590,000 7,609,000 273,000 111,000 290,000 110,000 60,000 844,000 Total 2,603,000 1,125,000 2,950,000 1,125,000 650,000 8,453,000 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 2,543,000 1,093,000 2,885,000 1,102,000 635,000 8,258,000 35,000 10,000 20,000 5,000 5,000 75,000 15,000 12,000 25,000 8,000 5,000 65,000 Cost Sharing, SPUC 10,000 10,000 20,000 10,000 5,000 55,000 Total 2,603,000 1,125,000 2,950,000 1,125,000 650,000 8,453,000 Budget Impact Bituminous rehabilitation projects are more cost effective than reconstructing pavements. Streets will be evaluated on a yearly basis and may be moved up or moved back in the CIP. Required ADA improvements are generally unfunded mandates to improve accessibility and to minimize liability. Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 133 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name CIF -26-002 Annual Bituminous Mill and Overlay Contact Department City Engineer Capital Improvements Fund Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 134 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name CIF -27-001 2027 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction Total Project Cost $5,450,000 Department Capital Improvements Fund Category Street Reconstruction Status Active Fund Capital Improvement Fund Contact City Engineer Type Improvement Priority 1 - Have to do Useful Life 30 years Description This project is for the full depth reconstruction of the bituminous roadway for Shenandoah Drive from 4th Ave to Unbridled Ave, Vierling Drive from Ramsey St to Eagle Creek Blvd, and portions of Pierce Street, McDevitt St, Shumway Street, Thomas Avenue, Hennes Avenue, Menke Circle and Menke Avenue. Additional storm sewer improvements, as well as utility and curb and gutter repairs and improvements will be evaluated and included with this project. Justification This is a continuation of the City's Pavement Preservation Program to maintain existing infrastructure. Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Engineering/Administration 2026 0 Total 400,000 400,000 2027 4,600,000 450,000 5,050,000 2028 2029 2030 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 4,600,000 850,000 5,450,000 Funding Sources 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total Capital Improvement Fund 400,000 Special Assessments Storm Drainage Fund Sanitary Sewer Fund Cost Sharing, SPUC 0 0 0 4,080,000 720,000 100,000 80,000 0 0 0 4,480,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 720,000 100,000 80,000 0 70,000 0 0 0 70,000 Tota I 400,000 5,050,000 0 0 0 5,450,000 Budget Impact Required ADA improvements are generally unfunded mandates to improve accessibility and to minimize liability. Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 135 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name CIF -27-001 2027 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction Contact Department City Engineer Capital Improvements Fund 2027 CIP Reclamation Projects Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 136 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name CIF -28-001 2028 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction Total Project Cost $5,050,000 Department Capital Improvements Fund Category Street Reconstruction Status Active Fund Capital Improvement Fund Contact City Engineer Type Improvement Priority 1 - Have to do Useful Life 30 years Description This project is for the full depth reconstruction of the bituminous roadway for 10th Avenue from Harrison Street to Apgar Street. As part of this project, a reduction from a 4 -lane section to a 3 -lane section and pedestrian improvements will be considered. The City will be applying for Safe Routes to School and Regional Solicitation funds to include the multi -modal improvements with the project. Additional storm sewer improvements as well as utility and curb and gutter repairs and improvements will be evaluated and included with this project. The project also includes full -depth reconstruction of Valley View Road from 17th Avenue to Countryside Drive. Funding for 10th Avenue is programmed in 2026 to prepare grant applications and complete preliminary engineering to determine the appropriate multi -modal improvements. Justification This is a continuation of the City's Pavement Preservation Program to maintain existing infrastructure. Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Engineering/Administration Funding Sources MSA - State Aid Capital Improvement Fund Special Assessments Storm Drainage Fund Cost Sharing, SPUC Sanitary Sewer Fund Total 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 0 0 4,200,000 0 0 4,200,000 100,000 350,000 400,000 0 0 850,000 100,000 350,000 4,600,000 0 0 5,050,000 Total 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 0 0 2,400,000 0 0 2,400,000 100,000 350,000 1,755,000 0 0 2,205,000 0 0 325,000 0 0 325,000 0 0 80,000 0 0 80,000 0 0 30,000 0 0 30,000 0 0 10,000 0 0 10,000 100,000 350,000 4,600,000 0 0 5,050,000 Budget Impact Required ADA improvements are generally unfunded mandates to improve accessibility and minimize liability. Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 137 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name CIF -28-001 2028 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction Contact Department City Engineer Capital Improvements Fund 4f 1 I Y'7 s /� ilia 1I i'_I)I.IIi _,L,? ''# F rii liii"a' '� '�! ' .� I �: _ ,i 1, ,. 6 € ` ti,rf, S r C .. IT( { i 1 s ' , i , } � ��# . - � . �"--,rte .'f s _ _ • F I (1-':''''.----',--_„, -, L."7:- :CI -I i -f_ rm ---- I J� .1 ,� I I� II _ SHAKEVF \-_ 1'1 —k II 21028 ('a P Roc him aCiu.i ii Projects t CuMi 0,14 Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 138 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name CIF -29-001 2029 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction Total Project Cost $4,750,000 Department Capital Improvements Fund Category Street Reconstruction Status Active Fund Capital Improvement Fund Contact City Engineer Type Improvement Priority 1 - Have to do Useful Life 30 years Description This project is for the full depth reconstruction of the bituminous roadway for 10th Avenue from Apgar Street to Marschall Road (CR17). As part of this project, a reduction from a 4 -lane section to a 3 -lane section and pedestrian improvements will be considered. The City will be applying for Safe Routes to School and Regional Solicitation funds to include the multi -modal improvements with the project. Additional storm sewer improvements as well as utility and curb and gutter repairs and improvements will be evaluated and included with this project. Funding is programmed in 2026 to prepare funding applications and complete preliminary engineering to determine the appropriate multi -modal improvements (completed with CIF -28-001). Justification This is a continuation of the City's Pavement Preservation Program to maintain existing infrastructure. Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Engineering/Administration Total Funding Sources 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 0 0 0 3,950,000 0 3,950,000 0 0 350,000 450,000 0 800,000 0 0 350,000 4,400,000 0 4,750,000 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total MSA - State Aid Capital Improvement Fund 0 0 0 2,400,000 0 2,400,000 0 0 350,000 1,495,000 0 1,845,000 Special Assessments Storm Drainage Fund Cost Sharing, SPUC Sanitary Sewer Fund 0 0 0 355,000 0 355,000 0 0 0 100,000 0 100,000 0 0 0 25,000 0 25,000 0 0 0 25,000 0 25,000 Total 0 0 350,000 4,400,000 0 4,750,000 Budget Impact Required ADA improvements are generally unfunded mandates to improve accessibility and minimize liability. Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 139 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name CIF -29-001 2029 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction Contact Department City Engineer Capital Improvements Fund 2029 CI P Reclamation Projects - 2029 Reclamation Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 140 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name CIF -30-001 2030 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction Total Project Cost $7,150,000 Department Capital Improvements Fund Category Street Reconstruction Status Active Fund Capital Improvement Fund Contact City Engineer Type Improvement Priority 1 - Have to do Useful Life 30 years Description This project is for the full depth reconstruction of the bituminous roadway for 11th Avenue, Polk St S, 13th Avenue, Taylor St S, Tyler St S, Harrison St S, Presidential Lane, Presidential Circle, Monroe St S, Jefferson St S, Madison St S, Justification This is a continuation of the City's Pavement Preservation Program to maintain existing infrastructure. Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Engineering/Administration 2026 2027 2028 Funding Sources Capital Improvement Fund Special Assessments Storm Drainage Fund MSA - State Aid Cost Sharing, SPUC Sanitary Sewer Fund Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2029 2030 Total 0 6,150, 000 6,150,000 450,000 550,000 1,000,000 450,000 6,700,000 7,150,000 Tota I 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 0 0 0 450,000 4,313,000 4,763,000 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 127,000 127,000 0 0 0 0 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 450,000 6,700,000 7,150,000 Budget Impact Required ADA improvements are generally unfunded mandates to improve accessibility and minimize liability. Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 141 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name CIF -30-001 2030 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction Contact Department City Engineer Capital Improvements Fund Jam— —, /G5, 1 or 1 I ir .,.. __�' — I! I i ...)_..i i s I I ..:T..! ..,Ya , i i C ' a F % N as I' I'' `""• I••,i w , . s A va L.----7.___Li .....r. .../..„......_ ..:' .`,, "t - i . .:,-....^,-_' A _:-.-'._ ,_ , ... . - i-ii] -if - -2L-- _, „..., ,,.:,,, , r... ..._... t __..... --- ..,--ii.r. y a9 . �1 7 I -: s ITS �16!.e�1 , '�.•a . ';' F ''l r 1 alw 1--ins.-.�yl�-Y1- �— , i 1! wl 4 ae i _ } ,:i. 'N. kr M s _ _ ‘,.-7: I ' F pa,pQI F Lett 1 Y I 7 — I' i 1IFp � ! i — •i • I � I ���11}.'-_-- I I `= • I 20.30} Ci P Reclamation Projects Riethrtiaon Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 142 CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A STREET RECONSTRUCTION PLAN AND THE ISSUANCE OF STREET RECONSTRUCTION BONDS THEREUNDER NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the "City"), will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 3, 2026, at or after 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 485 Gorman Street in the City, relating to a proposal concerning (1) the adoption of a five- year street reconstruction plan (the "Plan"); and (2) the issuance of general obligation street reconstruction bonds (the "Street Reconstruction Bonds") to finance the reconstruction of certain streets in the City, all pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.5 8, subdivision 3b, as amended. The Street Reconstruction Bonds will be issued in a principal amount not to exceed $12,000,000, plus any premium received. A draft copy of the Plan is on file with the City Clerk and is available for public inspection at City Hall during regular business hours. If a petition requesting a vote on the issuance of the Street Reconstruction Bonds, signed by voters equal to five percent of the votes cast in the last City general election, is filed with the City Administrator/City Clerk within 30 days after the public hearing, the City may issue the Street Reconstruction Bonds only after obtaining approval of a majority of voters voting on the question at an election. At the time and place fixed for the public hearing, the City Council will give all persons who appear at the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. In addition, interested persons may direct any questions or file written comments respecting the proposal with the City Clerk, at or prior to said public hearing. Dated: [Date of Publication] BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA /s/ William H. Reynolds City Administrator City of Shakopee, Minnesota SH155-507 (JAE) 989913v1 143 City of Shakopee — Street Reconstruction Plan Schedule of Events Action Send PH notice on SROP to Paper PH Notices Published Public Hearing on SOP Reverse Refer -r enduni period on SIO D E -ids s Call for Sale of Bonds by City Council Distribute Official Statement a i ng Call With S & D Sale of Bonds Closing on Bond Proceeds Date 3 . anuan 15, 2026 3y _ a -luary 22, 2O26 February 3.2O26 November 17, 2O26 By Mid November Week of December 1st or 7th December 15, 2026 By ❑ ecember 31, 2026 144 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.h January 6, 2026 Approve Change Order No. 3 for Canterbury Commons Internal Roadway Improvements Alex Jordan, City Engineer Action to be considered: Approve Change Order No. 3 to extend the completion date for the Canterbury Commons Internal Roadway Improvements. Motion Type: Approve Background: On June 4, 2024, the City Council awarded a contract to Heselton Construction, LLC (Heselton) for construction of the Canterbury Commons Internal Roadway Improvements. The Notice to Proceed was issued by the City on June 11, 2024. The City Council approved Change Order No. 1 on October 15, 2024 to extend the Substantial Completion date to June 14, 2025 and Final Completion date to June 28, 2025. This extension was approved to allow the Ampitheatre contractor to finish the necessary parking lot construction allowing the city to complete the roadway improvements. The Ampitheatre contractor did not complete the parking lot improvements until late in the construction season in 2025. This delay did not allow Heselton to complete the final lift of bituminous pavement and the roadway striping. City staff are recommending approval of Change Order No. 3 which will extend the Substantial Completion date to May 29, 2026 and Final Completion date to June 19, 2026. This extension will allow the final roadway improvements to be completed prior to the first event to be held at the Ampitheatre, which is planned for late June. Recommendation: Approve Change Order No. 3 Budget Impact: Heselton Construction, LLC has indicated that some of the bid items may increase in price 145 due to the expected rising labor and material costs. The City will negotiate the amended construction costs, if necessary, with Heselton in the spring prior to commencing the remainder of construction. The change order limits the cost increases to the values found in the Construction Cost Index. Based on the work completed to date, the total amended construction costs (including any cost increases due to this Change Order) is expected to be less than the total approved project costs based on the bid award. Attachments: Project Area Map.pdf Change Order #3 146 LP V a) c ,,,,,';‘,7-,-,, as w�, "z o�� § vi w "' ,`n, Z a. e-, r CLIENT: SHAKOPEE VlOSaNNIW 'AJNnOO 110OS 33dO)1VHS dO A110 C '171.0 -CZ 6AO :# 1031'021d .1110 1O3fOJd1N3W3A02�dWI SAVMOVOH 1VN2�31NI SN0WW03 A2�f192�31NV3 J PPP 0 0 0 = _ -HH, :1�50� o w o r w� z z m o N w � � a w } � � aoowc�i, w w J o w w z z w o cJ o w r o PROJECT NO.: 227704561 DWN BY: CHKD BY: APPD BY: MDH MJJ DML ISSUE DATE: 06/28/2024 ISSUE NO.:2 SHEET TITLE: OVERALL ROADWAY PLAN r O r Z r w v LL,,d © L# 2134110 3cJNVH� ilOd 43f1S51 bz0z/8z/90 0 l# Wf14N304V bZ0z/zz/50 � o ale H. a3nssl bzoz/�aeo EMS 1!Eni:33111133M. 0 N �z� _ � o o �� ' I O ' E !!H1!iH a w � rr v I I I W W X X cA w w v i, m ri, Le WOW1 Q w CCZ n v co o g J O H z m w z 0, c.: QoQ SITE ANALYSIS TABLE ADDRESS I NW CORNER OF 12TH A. EAST AND COUNT YROAD 83 Z A O r w � j Z H �_ Q r Q �w. w 4 � E 9.66 5.18 I 4.48 -L BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL ITILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF LINES. CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED JIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING ,OST TO THE OWNER. ;TATE ONE CALL CITY AREA: 651-054-0002 L FREE 1-800-252-1166 I L _ fliI w o 1 � I I I I Road C I (Removed) -IN ,c,_ w N d � F d W Z W � w Lij r H W ?Z � Q W Q I l�l � I. III I� �. Ill - - - - - -miam_ , --- ll fflimmordliximi— ' , 1, .. - - - - - I 4\ - _—-'--- ,g- . �� ;3��1�\ III 11111111 ) p ee iitr 7y/ \ .� ----_�_ U - N ...I, ., ....... L,A N i=OW ioF1 ,,,:,,,.,,,z., '_ �\�� :-1 4 TiITi' o 0 2 I�\ jp Wow Q2 1/ �Ci� 1111':::\ o W `.\ wz o, oci i o ,,� i �� ' � I' a I —.j �OL`l1r - w CO -. ITV'►"i'�/�1����ti _ �,V1^r�� � - .�-� jl l; y■ � 1 o w hid w � Wo/1/7, I i El- ; y I IY I I ` Q V8 I, � � 'I ' I I gw4- q I _ _ i a Eltitir O r ,,-,),(gII O C ,w� col I il 11 \_ I I � '� _%,\\A i aM5N I I; 4 - �� �‘‘. , �ii �Y► � _ _ � __ __ __ , !one c, .-. ,,,, � o 0 o w I q�. I 0, ., � _ ggi �` ,'OOO; I F f � I LI im. , ! , int1 -,..,' —.....,...=_--_ I*47/P 4F— \ . i I i / / +/ + Li,_, w m % CO Q . / • ' / 04 //%' — . N. , I \ . ,4,_ gI J 2 e / a\ / G N w 9 c7 ■, I Ilii I �I� I� xo I 1 iI r ' 0•' _bil _ 1 W m N W ^O p2 __ JPAi1\ ? W 1� NY Ll 1,5 ,I.1.2/0E/6 .N'S`J3AM 1,00E/6 0, l951,0 Nbld.S 1.O6-DISANSNV3d \NoIS34 5\S3111311f1 NNf12i1 aNV avod ovido-on30 NH31S, A` rl.31N, 195b011ZS1 f1 SECTION 00 63 63 CHANGE ORDER FORM Change Order No. 3 Date 12/8/2025 Agreement Date 6/4/2024 Name of Project: Canterbury Commons Internal Roadway Improvements Owner: City of Shakopee Contractor: Heselton Construction The following changes are hereby made to the Contract Documents: Substantial completion date has been revised to May 29th, 2026. Final completion has been revised to June 19th, 2026. Justification: The substantial and final completion dates have been revised to 2026 to account for the coordination delays from adjacent construction projects. The Amphitheater improvements, including the VIP parking lot, needed to be completed prior to allowing. Heselton to grade the boulevard, construct the sidewalk and install the landscaping along Road B adjacent to the parking lot. The Amphitheater improvements did not get completed until the second week in October of 2025, which prevented final paving and striping operations from occurring. The City is amenable to extending the contract completion date, to allow the remaining work to be completed during favorable weather conditions creating a better finished product. The contractor has expressed that some of the bid items may increase in price due to expected rising labor and material costs that are to be discussed in the spring. The increased costs will be limited to values found in the construction cost Index, if necessary. Project No. 193807171 Change Order Form 00 63 63-1 148 Original Contract Price: $ 4,419,649/5 Current Contract Price adjusted to previous Change Order: $ 4,000,444.47 The Contract Price due to this Change Order will be decreased by $ TBD The new Contract Price including this Change Order will be $ TBD Original Contract Substantial Completion Date: October 15, 2024 Current Contract Substantial Completion Date adjusted to Change Order #1: June 14, 2025 The Contract Time will be Increased by 350 Calendar days Current Contract Substantial Completion Date adjusted to this Change Order: May 29th, 2026 Original Contract Final Completion Date: November 1, 2024 Current Contract Final Completion Date adjusted to this Change Order: June 27, 2025 The Contract Time will be Increased by 357 Calendar days Current Contract Final Completion Date adjusted to this Change Order: June 19th, 2026 Approvals Required: To be effective, this Order must be approved by the Owner and the Contractor if it changes the scope of objective of the Project, or as may otherwise be required by the Supplemental General Conditions. -Ig1 � lly signed by Wyers, Nick 1111Ve rs N i c. Requested by:..1:291 29 N��yera, lslck", oU=Internal, J , ❑ I 2025.12.10 14:19:0fi p ' DC=ad9 Nick Wyers, P.E. Ell ly sign. by Jason drandvold Accepted by: Jason B ra n d vo l' c s n.B �heseltonoonsu►r�u�n.�on,. �242S.1210 78:00:0446'66' Heselton Construction Accepted by: City of Shakopee, Mayor Accepted by: City of Shakopee, City Administrator Project No. 193807171 Change Order Form 00 63 63-2 149 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.i January 6, 2026 Adopt Resolution of Support Dissolving the U.S. Hwy 169 Corridor Coalition Alex Jordan, City Engineer Action to be considered: Adopt Resolution R2026-008. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: The U.S. Highway 169 Corridor Coalition was formed in response to growing concerns about safety, congestion, and economic development along the US -169 corridor. In 2008, communities and counties from Mankato to Bloomington and Edina began meeting to address these issues. In spring 2009, the Coalition was officially established to advocate for coordinated improvements across the corridor. The Coalition's mission is "Working together to enhance safety, reduce congestion, and maximize economic development along the U.S. Highway 169 interregional corridor." Over the past 15 years, the Coalition has partnered to address several key challenges, including: • Relieving congestion at major interchanges, especially 1-494/US-169 • Advancing US -169 as a regional transit corridor • Strengthening intermodal connections between rail, roads, and transit • Improving southern corridor access to regional and international markets, including the Ports of Savage With the Coalition's mission fulfilled and member jurisdictions now equipped to pursue corridor priorities independently, the Coalition's leadership has recommended an orderly and transparent dissolution. The existing Joint Powers Agreement has an established process for dissolution, which includes obtaining Resolutions of Support from members. The final membership meeting will be held on February 26 to celebrate the Highway 169 150 Corridor Coalition. Recommendation: Adopt Budget Impact: The Coalition will not collect any membership dues in 2026 and beyond. Attachments: Resolution R2026-008.docx 151 RESOLUTION R2026-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA SUPPORTING THE DISSOLUTION OF THE U.S. HIGHWAY 169 CORRIDOR COALITION WHEREAS, the U.S. Highway 169 Corridor Coalition was established in 2009 as a collaborative effort among cities, counties, and stakeholders to advocate for transportation improvements, safety, and economic development along the U.S. Highway 169 corridor; and WHEREAS, the Coalition successfully unified regional voices to elevate the corridor's importance in state and federal transportation planning, securing attention and investment for key infrastructure projects; and WHEREAS, the Coalition has fulfilled its original mission, and its member jurisdictions have developed the capacity to pursue corridor priorities through other regional and legislative channels; and WHEREAS, the Coalition's leadership has recommended an orderly and transparent dissolution process, ensuring that remaining funds and responsibilities are appropriately distributed and documented; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City of Shakopee formally supports the dissolution of the U.S. Highway 169 Corridor Coalition, recognizing its contributions to regional transportation advocacy and collaboration. 2. The City expresses its gratitude to past and present Coalition members, staff, and partners for their service and dedication to the corridor's long-term vitality. 3. City staff are authorized to take any necessary administrative actions to complete the dissolution process in accordance with applicable agreements and Coalition bylaws. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 6th day of January 2026. Matt Lehman, Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Richard Parsons, City Clerk Prepared by: City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 152 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.j January 6, 2026 Approve a Massage Business License for VIP Massage Inc. and a Massage Therapist License for Lyudmila Lelyukh. Heidi Emerson, Deputy City Clerk Action to be considered: Approve a massage business license for VIP Massage Inc. located at 1275 Ramsey Street Suite 600, and a massage therapist license for Lyudmila Lelyukh. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: Staff has received applications for a Massage Business License for VIP Massage Inc., located at 1275 Ramsey Street Suite 600, and a Massage Therapist License for Lyudmila Lelyukh. The Police Department performed a background investigation and found nothing that would prohibit issuance of the licenses. Recommendation: Approve the above requested motion. Budget Impact: N/A Attachments: 153 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.k January 6, 2026 Approve a Massage Business License for Clinical Massage and Bodywork LLC. and a Massage Therapist license for Vienetta Lelyukh. Heidi Emerson, Deputy City Clerk Action to be considered: Approve a massage business license for Clinical Massage and Bodywork LLC., located at 1275 Ramsey Street Suite 600, and a massage therapist license for Vienetta Lelyukh. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: Staff has received applications for a Massage Business License for Clinical Massage & Bodywork LLC. located at 1275 Ramsey Street Suite 600, and a Massage Therapist License for Vienetta Lelyukh. The Police Department performed a background investigation and found nothing that would prohibit issuance of the licenses. Recommendation: Approve the above requested motion. Budget Impact: N/A Attachments: 154 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.1 January 6, 2026 Approve a Cooperative Agreement with Scott County for the Construction and Maintenance of a Traffic Signal at the County Highway 16 and Dean Lakes Trail/Kinlock Way Intersection Alex Jordan, City Engineer Action to be considered: Approve a Cooperative Agreement with Scott County for the Construction and Maintenance of a Traffic Signal at the County Highway (CH) 16 and Dean Lakes Trail/Kinlock Way intersection. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: The Scott County adopted Transportation Capital Improvement Plan programs the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of County Highway (CH) 16 and Dean Lakes Trail/Kinlock Way. The improvements are proposed to address safety and operational deficiencies. Scott County is in the process of preparing plans and specifications for the improvements and construction is planned for summer 2026. The Cooperative Agreement will establish the maintenance responsibilities for the improvements. Scott County will own and maintain the traffic signal system. The City will be responsible for the emergency vehicle pre-emption system, street lighting and electrical power, consistent with other County -owned signal systems and snow removal on trails (done at our discretion). Recommendation: Approval of the Agreement Budget Impact: The City's share of the project costs is estimated to be $362,243, which is calculated based upon 50% of the final actual construction costs of the traffic signal improvements, including engineering. The City's share of the costs will be due on or before July 1, 2027. Attachments: 155 ShakopeeCOOP_CH1 6-DeanLakes-KinlockWay_Signal(CP1 6-56).pdf 156 CP 16-56 City of Shakopee County of Scott COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, by and between the County of Scott, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County" and the City of Shakopee, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City". RECITALS: A. County and City seek to improve County Highway (CH) 16 at the Dean Lakes Trail/Kinlock Way intersection by installing a traffic signal system with flashing yellow arrow (FYA) signalization, Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP), blue enforcement lighting, ADA compliant Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) push button stations, and fiber optic interconnectivity to the County Traffic fiber backbone, hereinafter referred to as the "Project". B. The above -described Project lies within the corporate limits of the City. C. City supports the planned Project and is willing to cooperate with County to complete the Project and share costs related to the Project, consistent with the County's City Local Cost Participation Policy. D. County plans to design the Project in 2025, with planned construction in 2026. E. City currently has this Project identified in Year 2030 of its Capital Improvement Program. F. County agrees in order to advance Project, to initially fund Project and allow City to provide its share of Project costs no later than 2027. G. The Scott County Cost Participation Policy states the City and the County will share equally the cost of the signal design, material purchases, construction and contract administration, along with any walk, trail, ADA improvements, and all pedestrian amenities including Accessible Pedestrian Signals (APS), which are included in this Project. H. The County Engineer has prepared an estimate of the City's cost share for the Project in the sum of three hundred sixty-two thousand two hundred forty-three dollars and no cents ($362,243.00) (see Exhibit A). I It is contemplated that the Project shall be carried out by the parties under the provisions of Minn. Stat. §162.17, subd. 1 and Minn. Stat. §471.59. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreement contained within this Agreement, the County and City hereby agree as follows: 1. Incorporation 1 157 CP 16-56 City of Shakopee County of Scott The recitals set out above are hereby incorporated into this Agreement as if fully restated herein. 2. Scope of Services a. The County shall advertise for bids for the work and construction of the aforesaid Project, receive and open bids pursuant to said advertisement and enter into a contract (Contract) with the successful bidder at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder, according to law in such case provided for counties. The Contract will include the plans and specifications prepared by the County or its agents, which plans and specifications are by this reference made a part hereof. b. County shall have overall authority to administer the Contract and inspect the construction of the Contract work for the Project. County shall have ultimate authority in initiating and determining change orders, supplemental agreements, and final quantities. The City Engineer shall cooperate with the County Engineer and his staff at their request to the extent necessary but shall have no other responsibility for the supervision of the work. c. City agrees to provide, at no cost to the County, any and all permanent or temporary right-of-way on property owned by the City and needed by County for the completion of the Project. d. The County Engineer shall prepare monthly progress reports and furnish to the City upon request. 3. Payment a. It is specifically agreed that the estimate(s) mentioned in this agreement is only a preliminary estimate of the cost for the work on the Project and that the unit prices set forth in the Contract and the final quantities as measured by the County Engineer shall govern in computing the total final construction cost for apportioning the cost of the Project according to the provisions of this section. b. County shall cover all costs associated with the design and construction of the Project in 2025 and 2026. c. On or before July 1, 2027, City shall reimburse County as follows: 1) Design: fifty percent (50%) of all actual costs of planning, design, and preparation of plans and specifications for the Project. 2) Construction: fifty percent (50%) of total final construction cost of the Contract work for the Project, including any materials purchased in advance for installation during construction. 3) Administration/Inspection: fifty percent (50%) of administration and construction inspection of the Project. 4) Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS): fifty percent (50%) of the cost to connect the new signal to the County ATMS system. d. Upon completion of the Project, County will submit an updated Exhibit A to City for payment reference. e. On or before May 31, 2027, County will submit an invoice to City for payment due, and City shall pay all amounts due within thirty (30) days of receipt of this invoice. f. Should City not pay all amounts due County by July 1, 2027, the amount due shall be increased one half percent (0.5%) for each month the payment is delayed. 2 158 CP 16-56 City of Shakopee County of Scott 4. Ongoing Maintenance Items a. Future Modifications. County reserves the right not to issue any permits for a period of five (5) years after completion of the Project for any service cuts in the roadway surfacing of the County Highway included in the Project for any installation of underground utilities which would be considered as new work; service cuts shall be allowed for the maintenance and repair of any existing underground utilities. b. Electrical Energy. City shall provide the electrical energy for the operation of the traffic control signal system and integral street lights installed under the Project, all at the sole cost and expense of the City. c. Maintenance and Repair. County shall maintain and repair the traffic control signal system at the sole cost and expense of the County, except that the cost of maintenance and repairs to the EVP system shall be at the sole cost and expense of the City. County will invoice City for any expense associated with County work performed on the EVP system. d. Signal and EVP Timing. All timing of the signal and EVP system shall be determined by the County. City shall not revise by addition or deletion, nor alter or adjust any component, part, sequence, or timing of the traffic control signal system or EVP system installed with the Project; however, nothing herein shall be construed as restraint of prompt, prudent action by properly constituted authorities in situations where a part of such traffic control signal system may be directly involved in an emergency. e. EVP System. The EVP system provided for in this Agreement shall be installed, operated, maintained or removed in accordance with the following conditions and requirements: 1) Emitter units may be installed and used only on vehicles responding to an emergency as defined in Minn. Stat. Secs. 169.01, subd. 5 and 169.03. The City will provide the County Engineer or his duly appointed representative a list of all such vehicles with emitter units upon request. 2) Malfunctions of the EVP system shall be reported to the County immediately. 3) In the event said EVP system or components are, in the opinion of the County, being misused or the conditions set forth herein are violated, and such misuse or violation continues after receipt by the City of written notice thereof from the County, the County shall remove the EVP systems. Upon removal of the EVP systems pursuant to this paragraph, the field wiring, cabinet wiring, detector receivers, infrared detector heads and indicator lamps and all other components shall become the property of the County. f. Street Lights. City shall maintain the integral streetlights including the luminaire and all its components at the sole cost and expense of the City, except for the County shall maintain electrical equipment and wiring connecting to the luminaire head at the sole cost and expense of the County. g Pavement Striping and Markings. Initial pavement striping and markings shall be included as part of the Project. The County shall be responsible for all subsequent pavement striping and markings on its county roads as required after the initial work and shall be responsible for one hundred percent (100%) of the subsequent related costs. The City shall be responsible for all subsequent striping and markings on its city roads, including pedestrian markings across its City roadway intersection legs, as required after the initial work and shall be 3 159 CP 16-56 City of Shakopee County of Scott responsible for one hundred percent (100%) of the subsequent related costs. h. Trail Maintenance. All future maintenance costs of Trail improvements constructed under this Agreement will be shared equally between the County and City regardless of which party performs the maintenance work. Either party can initiate and complete such maintenance work with notice given to the other party. Upon completion of such work the initiating party will invoice the other for fifty percent (50%) of the actual total cost. The preventative maintenance on trails constructed with this project, including sealcoating, will be cost shared equally between the County and City with City administering the process per a separate trail maintenance agreement. i A future County Global Maintenance Agreement, upon execution, may supersede maintenance responsibilities stated in this Agreement. 5. Effective Date of Contract This Agreement shall be effective upon execution by all parties to the Agreement. 6. Term of Contract This Agreement will terminate upon City's payment for their share of costs, provided that the Ongoing Maintenance section shall survive the Agreement termination. 7. Authorized Agents The Parties shall appoint an authorized agent for the purpose of administration of this agreement. City is notified of the authorized agent of County as follows: Mark Callahan, or his successor Highway Division Program Manager Scott County Transportation Services 200 Fourth Avenue West Shakopee, MN 55379 (952) 496-8367 macallahan@co.scott.mn.us The County is notified the authorized agent for City is as follows: Alex Jordan, or his successor City Engineer City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 (952) 233-9361 ajordan@shakopeemn.gov 8. County and State Audit Pursuant to Minn. Stat. Sec. 16C.05, subd. 5, the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the County and City pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to examination by the County, City and the State Auditor. Complete and accurate records of the work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be kept by the 4 160 CP 16-56 City of Shakopee County of Scott County and City for a minimum of six (6) years following termination of this Agreement for such auditing purposes. The retention period shall be automatically extended during the course of any administrative or judicial action involving the County or the City regarding matters to which the records are relevant. The retention period shall be automatically extended until the administrative or judicial action is finally completed or until the authorized agent of the County or City notifies each party in writing that the records no longer need to be kept. 9. Liability and Indemnity a. Neither party, its officers, agents or employees, either in their individual or official capacity, shall be responsible or liable in any manner to the other party for any claim, demand, action or cause of action of any kind or character arising out of, allegedly arising out of or by reason of the performance, negligent performance or nonperformance of the described maintenance, restoration, repair or replacement work by the other party, or arising out of the negligence of any contractor under any contract let by the other party for the performance of said work; and each party agrees to defend, save, keep and hold harmless the other, its officers, agents and employees harmless from all claims, demands, actions or causes of action arising out of negligent performance by its officers, agents or employees. b. It is further agreed that neither party to this Agreement shall be responsible or liable to the other or to any other person or entity for any claims, damages, actions, or causes of actions of any kind or character arising out of, allegedly arising out of or by reason of the performance, negligent performance or nonperformance of any work or part hereof by the other as provided herein; and each party further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense and indemnify the other party for any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising in connection with or by virtue of performance of its own work as provided herein. Each party's obligation to indemnify the other under this clause shall be limited in accordance with the statutory tort liability limitation as set forth in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 to limit each party's total liability for all claims arising from a single occurrence, include the other party's claim for indemnification, to the limits prescribed under §466.04. It is further understood and agreed that the Parties' total liability shall be limited by Minn. Stat. §471.59, Subdivision 1 a. as a single governmental unit. c. It is further agreed that any and all employees of each party and all other persons engaged by a party in the performance of any work or services required or provided herein to be performed by the party shall not be considered employees, agents or independent contractors of the other party, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workers' Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged shall be the sole responsibility of the employing party and shall not be the obligation or responsibility of the other party. 10. Insurance Since each party is a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, each party shall 5 161 CP 16-56 City of Shakopee County of Scott maintain a program of self-insurance or insurance covering general liability and automobile liability coverage protecting itself, its officers, agents, employees and duly authorized volunteers against any usual and customary public liability claims to the limits prescribed under Minn. Stat. Sec. 466.04 and Workers' Compensation in accordance with the Minnesota statutory requirements. Said coverage shall be kept in effect during the entire term of this Agreement. 11. Data Practices All records kept by the City and the County with respect to the Project shall be subject to examination by the representatives of each party. All data collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose by the activities of the County or City pursuant to this Agreement shall be governed by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as amended, and the Minnesota Rules implementing such Act now in force or hereafter adopted. 12. Equal Employment and Americans with Disabilities In connection with the work under this agreement, City agrees to comply with the applicable provisions of state and federal equal employment opportunity and nondiscrimination statutes and regulations. In addition, upon entering into this agreement, City certifies that it has been made fully aware of Scott County's Equal Employment Opportunity and Americans With Disabilities Act Policies, that it supports these policies and that it will conduct its own employment practices in accordance therewith. Failure on the part of City to conduct its own employment practices in accordance with County Policy may result in the withholding of all or part of regular payments by the County due under this agreement unless or until City complies with the County policy, and/or suspension or termination of this agreement. 13. Controlling Law The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations between the parties and performance under it. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation hereunder shall be those courts located with the County of Scott, State of Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involving the parties shall be in the appropriate federal court within the State of Minnesota. 14. Changes/Amendments The parties agree that no change or modification to this agreement, or any attachments hereto, shall have any force or effect unless the change is reduced to writing, dated, and made part of this agreement. The execution of the change shall be authorized and signed in the same manner as this agreement, or according to other written policies of the original parties. 15. Severability In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid and unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall be valid and binding upon the parties unless such invalidity or non -enforceability would cause the Agreement to fail its purpose. One or more waivers by either party of any provision, term, condition or covenant shall not be 6 162 CP 16-56 City of Shakopee County of Scott construed by the other party as a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same by the other party. 16. Entire Agreement It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained herein and that this agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the County and City relating to the subject matter hereof. 7 163 CP 16-56 City of Shakopee County of Scott IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed intending to be bound thereby. By Matt Lehman, May Date CITY OF SH"' ,. 5‘CYN„) oe0, 'Ok V Ose0\' ity Administrator COUNTY OF SCOTT By Lezlie Vermillion, County Administrator Date Upon proper execution, this agreement RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL: will be legally valid and binding. By By Jeanne Andersen, Assistant County Attorney Anthony J. Winiecki, County Engineer Date Date 8 164 EXHIBIT A - Summary Division of Cost Summary Shakopee responsible for 50% of Construction, Design Services, Administration/Inspection, and Advanced Traffic Management System Costs Preliminary Estimated Costs CH 16 / Dean Lakes Trail / Kinlock Way Intersection (CP 16-56) Construction Total Estimated Construction Costs 50% of Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 656,506.00 $ 328,253.00 Design Services Total Estimated Design Costs 50% of Total Estimated Design Costs $ 36,000.00 $ 18,000.00 Administration/Inspection Total Estimated Administration/Inspection Costs 50% of Total Estimated Administration/Inspection Costs $ 25,000.00 $ 12,500.00 Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) Total Estimated ATMS Costs 50% of Total Estimated ATMS Costs $ 6,980.00 $ 3,490.00 CITY OF SHAKOPEE ESTIMATED GRAND TOTAL $ 362,243.00 165 O O o O 0 0 00 ea CC C U co O J o EXHIBIT A Construction Costs Estimated Costs and Quantities O O O 000000000000 000000000 O O O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LC) LC) O CO N Lf) O O O LC) O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LC) O O O O O O O O CO 0) O r N N LC) O LC) 0) O O CD CD CD CD LC) O CO N. O N. CO O CO LC) O O O M LC) CO CO r N- r CO 00 LC) CO O LC) CO N. O r CO 0) N. O N. LO- O r C 7 N LCD- LO- Lo- C37 00 69. 69 C; 69- {f} ff} 7 00 O C0 {f} b9 N 69 69 {f} b9 b9 r 69 {f} 69- 69 b9 69 69 00 r 69. Cr) CA N b9 b9 Ef}0,1 } CO a C al QNI. nLn LC) LC) 0) CA LC) ti O LC)Lt) 0) C0 Ln N O C) Ln LC) N O LC) LC) < r O O O co N r N O f` r( 00 00 p N 00 p p N O r 4 co cA co W r O O O 00000000000000 000000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L() L() O O O LC) O O O LC) O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O CO 0) O r N N LC) O LC) 0) O O O 0 0 0 LC) O O N- O71- LO.. O O N O CO LO CO CO r N. r CO O_ O N CO O LC) O N- O CO O LO- Oee. r r C7 r L!7 L!7 4ea LC) 0) 00 N b9 O b9 ti O ti {f} {f} N .69. {f} {f} } } r E f} 69. {f} {f} (f} .609.CO 69. r H� C`7 0) N Ei} b9}69. CV b9 CO 69- 69- Qti ( Ln LC LC) (/) p p O O O ti C O N — d7 d7 Lc,c\ICO4Lo •LC) d7 L• N r 1-0. V).71- O O f` r (�l O r LC) CO CO p CO p p r N C° WI O O 00000000000 000000000 00000000 O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) N6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LC) O O O O6 O O O O O O N- 0) O N d - LC) 0 CDCD0) O O O O C0 CDCDCDCD0 CO N 0 0,r O O O - ) O O O CO N O N- O CO.. CO N LC) N a) N - O O N LC) (0 O O C0 LC) O N- CO CO a) a) LC) a Lf) 0 C7 CDCDea ea N ea C7 N— N N N- N CO- 0 0 00 b9 r O 00 b9 b9 b9 b9 CO- CDO CC U 69 r 69. 69 69 {f} {f} 69 N {}} r r 69- {f} r r j` bF} bf} N b9 f` 00 L() ea ea b9 b9 69 69 b9 N b9 r co b9 b9 b9 b9 cn W Est Unit Cost 000000000000000000000000000000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O O O O LC) L() O CO N O O O O L() O O O O O O O O CO O CO LC) O O O O O O LO O r 69 O b9 69 LC) LC) N 10 0 0 0 0 (0 0 0 0 0 69 O b9 b9 r N r O O O r N b9 — r N b9 b9 b9 O O N b9 b9 O O N O 69 69. 69. CC) O O 69. 69. b9 69. b9 O N b9 CO N- 69. LC) {6} r r 69 r j` {f} b9 b9 b9 69. N69 - co co co r a co r r r N r OM M.- Op r a) r r co r r a 4 co N- co r r oo E E E E E (n (n co 3 c u_ u_ (n u_ u_ (n N , IL IL IL IL IL D E E E W CO i- zs c zs E w w co-' w c w E E E zs zs J J (n (l) (/) (� (!) J (/) (/) (n (n J J J J (n (!1 J J J J J E m 0 - 0) _(> Q a) E _ co_ CU LC) a, ° ° E E U o a) E O N cn L c a) c Q O `� Ua co c ca N E o) L U U 2 2 () m i— E g o Cr)>, }' cn > cn > c O T, op O U O U O E 1 CU CU 4) 0 a) c W J , O O U L c U E O O �- ci s c co v 0) -, J m U ° E = a) w >� `� °� a) 7,) 1E i7 72 ^ U C C 03 LO CZ >> O O CZ 0_ > O 0 ) 7 2O a) ° CD a) a� m a� a� a� o U a)) -0 co a U o C J so 7 a 73 cn c� o —; N c� c� o 0) o 0 0 o ° — �) ° E OC o o° E a) -c I m C >> E E E E co) Q U co s= c a) ' f a� u) o- > o W cn O O 00 cC a) cC a) a) a) 0) >, = O O � 0 .o) E o 0 - - co 2 J O 0) < U (/) (� (� OC < H O U (n (n W (� (/) 4 N 0 U s= , O a) U 2 -' — — — N N CO CO CO CO N- 0) CO OD CO N— N N CO CO — CCD N CO N CO CO CO CO CO a C Z co. O LC)LC) LC) LC) LO LC) LC) LC) LC) LC) LC) co. O O O LC) LC) LC) LC) LC) LC) LO O LC) LC) LC) LC) LC) O o E r r N- 4 4 4 4 4 4 r p. - N- M M 4 4 4 LC) LC) M M LC) N N N N N r N r r N O O O O O O O N— CO N CO CO (0 (0 CO CO CO CO CD N- N- N. CO CO CO CO CO 0 L O O O O N CO LC) LC) LC) LC) LC) LO 10 10 LC) LC) LC) LC) LC) LO LC) 10 10 LC) i +� C13Q — N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (n O Q) 0 V) W , Total Estimated Construction Costs County Materials Costs Total Estimated Project Const Costs 0000 O O O O O O O O (3) LC) LC) O N- N- a) b9 b9 b9 69 O O O O LC) 10 Ln LC) O O O O 0000 O O O O O O O O 0) LC) LC) O 71- I` ti LC) ea ua ua 69 O O O O L0 L0 LC) LC) O O O C) a a a O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0) LC) LC) O 00 b9 b9 b9 b9 0000 O O O O O O O O (00) O O 0) LC) 10 O _C C C C CC CZ CZ 0000 WWWW Cll CO cr) a) cn E m a O ) U co CD � 2 IL >.- " a) Q L a) L U _ E - c v c E (3 -o -o SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.m January 6, 2026 Resolution R2026-010, Extending City Issued THC Licenses Rick Parsons Action to be considered: Approve Resolution R2026-010, a resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, extending the term of THC Licenses Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: Before implementation of Minnesota Statute chapter 342 (Cannabis Act), hemp businesses were regulated under Minnesota Statute section 151, which required state registration and allowed for local licensing. The City of Shakopee established its own THC licensing, meaning hemp retailers were required to obtain both a state registration and a City -issued THC license before selling hemp products. Chapter 342 created a new statewide licensing framework requiring hemp businesses to obtain a lower -potency hemp edible (LPHE) license from the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM), and retailers to obtain a local retail registration. Once an OCM hemp license is issued, the City THC license terminates and the business is regulated solely under Chapter 342. State hemp licensing is currently in a transition period. Businesses previously registered with the state and holding a City THC license may continue sales while their OCM applications are pending; others must cease sales until licensed. OCM initially set December 31, 2025, as the transition end date and expected all OCM hemp licenses to be issued by that date. Based on that timeline, the City did not require THC license renewals in December, as the City licensing program was expected to sunset. However, the transition end date was recently extended to March 31, 2026. To prevent a regulatory gap, the City proposes extending existing THC licenses until December 31, 2026, with the understanding that the City license will terminate upon the business receiving an OCM hemp license. Extending the THC licenses allows currently licensed businesses to continue lawful sales during the transition and maintains the City's ability to regulate hemp businesses until OCM licensure is complete. Extending to 167 December 31, 2026, also affords some flexibility, should the transition end date move again. Recommendation: Approve Resolution R2026-010, a resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, extending the term of THC licenses Budget Impact: No budget impact. Current city issued THC license holders will not be required to pay for this extension. Attachments: Resolution R2026-010 THC License Extension 168 RESOLUTION R2026-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, EXTENDING THE TERM OF THC LICENSES WHEREAS, the city of Shakopee ("the City") City Code, Sections 110.200-110.212 establishes licensing requirements for products containing tetrahydrocannabinol ("THC') derived from hemp that are authorized pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 151.72 ("City License"); and WHEREAS, the Minnesota legislature adopted Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 342 regulating adult use cannabis and hemp products ("Cannabis Act") which also includes a hemp -derived THC license called the Lower -Potency Hemp Edible Retailer license ("State License"); and WHEREAS, the Office of Cannabis Management ("OCM") established a "transition period" that was set to expire on December 31, 2025, during which the City License is still effective until the business receives a State License; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2025 the OCM extended the transition period until March 31, 2026; and WHEREAS, to provide the City with the ability to continue regulating THC products prior to a business with a City License receiving a State License, the City Council has decided to extend the term of the City Licenses until December 31, 2026. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE that the City Licenses issued pursuant to City Code sections 110.200. et. seq. related to the sale of Tetrahydrocannabinol Products are hereby extended, retroactive from January 1, 2026, until December 31, 2026. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 6th day of January, 2026. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Prepared by: City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 169 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.n January 6, 2026 Approval of the December 16, 2025 City Council Minutes Rick Parsons Action to be considered: Approve the December 16, 2025 City Council minutes. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: N/A Recommendation: Approve the December 16, 2025 City Council minutes. Budget Impact: N/A Attachments: 12-16-2025 City Council Minutes 170 SHAKOPEE City Council City Hall 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN, 55379 Tuesday, December 16, 2025 7:00 p.m. Vision: Shakopee is a place where people want to be! A distinctive river town, with a multitude of business, cultural and recreational opportunities in a safe, welcoming, and attractive environment for residents and visitors. Mission: Our mission is to deliver high quality services essential to maintaining a safe and sustainable community. We commit to doing this cost-effectively, with integrity and transparency. 1) Call to Order 2) Roll Call PRESENT: Mayor Lehman, Council Member Contreras, Council Member Whiting, Council Member DuLaney, and Council Member Lara ABSENT: None. ALSO PRESENT: None. 3) Pledge of Allegiance 4) Approval of Agenda Council Member Contreras made a motion to approve the agenda, second by Council Member Lara and the motion passed. 5 - 0 5 Consent Agenda 5.a) 2026 Economic Development Authority Levy - (item pulled for separate consideration) 171 5.b) Approval of the 2026 Property Tax Levy and the 2026 Annual Budget (item pulled for separate consideration) 5.c) 2025 Miscellaneous Gifts and Donations 5.d) Renewal of Go for Gold Skate School Agreement 5.e) Outdoor Athletic Field Use Policy 5.f) Purchase Three Marked Utility Police Interceptors for Police Department. 5.g) 2025 Budget Amendments 5.h) Monthly Financial Report - November 2025 5.i) Scott County Public Health's Statewide Health Improvement Partnership Grant Application 5.j) Chevrolet First Responders Sponsorship Program Donation 5.k) Community Center and Ice Arena ADA Report 5.1) Community Center Cleaning Contract 5.m) Approval of the December 2, 2025 City Council Minutes 5.n) Approve the Purchase of Replacement Light Poles for Downtown Shakopee Street Lighting District 5.o) Resolution establishing the 2026 Regular Meeting Calendar for the City Council and EDA 5.p) Purchase of a Level 3 Charger with Installation for Quarry Lake Using the Sourcewell Purchasing Contract - (item pulled for separate consideration) 5.q) Final Payment for General Conditions to Kraus Anderson for Jackson Commons Council Member Whiting made a motion to approve the consent agenda with the modification of pulling items 5.a, 5.b, and 5.p, for separate consideration, second by Council Member Contreras and the motion passed. 5 -0 6) Public Comment 7) Business removed from consent agenda 5.a) 2026 Economic Development Authority Levy_ 172 Council Member Whiting made a motion to approve Resolution No. R2025-143, approving the 2026 EDA Levy, second by Council Member Contreras and the motion passed. 3 - 2 Nays: Mayor Lehman, Council Member DuLaney 5.b) Approval of the 2026 Property Tax Levy and the 2026 Annual Budget Council Member Whiting made a motion to approve Resolution R2025- 141 and R2025-142, approving the property tax levy collectible in 2026 and the 2026 annual budget, second by Council Member Contreras and the motion passed. 3 - 2 Nays: Mayor Lehman, Council Member DuLaney 5.p) Purchase of a Level 3 Charger with Installation for Quarry Lake Using the Sourcewell Purchasing Contract Council Member Whiting made a motion to approve the contract with Chargepoint in the amount of $49,872.00 for purchase and installation by Hunt Electric of a Level 3 Charger to be installed at Quarry Lake Park parking lot using the Sourcewell Purchasing Contract for services and appropriate discounts, second by Council Member Lara and the motion passed. 4 - 1 Nays: Mayor Lehman Public Hearings 8.a) Public Hearing for the 2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction Project Council Member Lara made a motion to open public hearing, second by Council Member Contreras and the motion passed. 5 - 0 Council Member DuLaney made a motion to close public hearing, second by Council Member Whiting and the motion passed. 5 - 0 Council Member Contreras made a motion to approve Resolution R2025-140, ordering improvements and preparation of plans and specifications for the 2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction Project, CIF -26-001, second by Council Member Whiting and the motion passed. 5 - 0 General Business 9.a) Recreation Program Plan Council Member Lara made a motion to approve the Recreation Program Plan, second by Council Member DuLaney and the motion passed. 5 - 0 9.b) Organizational Restructure of Parks and Recreation Department Council Member Lara made a motion to approve the organizational restructure of Parks and Rec., second by Council Member Contreras and the motion passed. 5 - 0 10) Reports 10.a) News and Announcements 10.b) City Bill List 11) Other Business 12) Adjourn to January 6, 2026, at 7:00 pm Council Member Lara made a motion to adjourn to January 6, 2026, at 7:00 pm, second by Council Member Contreras and the motion passed. 5 - 0 174 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.o January 6, 2026 Accept a Proposal from Stantec Consulting Services for Engineering Services for the Lions Park Parking Lot Improvements Micah Heckman, Assistant City Engineer Alex Jordan, City Engineer Action to be considered: Accept a proposal in the amount of $153,800 with Stantec to perform design and bidding services for the Lions Park Parking Lot Improvement Projects (PA -26-03; PR -26-002; PR -26- 003). Motion Type: Approve Background: The 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) programs construction of improvements at Lions Park in 2026 through several projects, PR -26-002, PR -26-003, and PA -26-03. The improvements include an expansion of the parking lot near SandVenture and Tommy's Malt Shop, installation of a new permanent chilled slab outdoor rink, reconstruction of the parking lot near the splash pad, improvements to the drainage outlet from the splash pad and a mill and overlay of the existing entrance drive and main parking lot. Stantec's proposal identifies scope of services and estimated costs to complete the preliminary engineering, final design/construction documents and bidding services for the improvements. The proposal also includes costs for a subconsultant to design the permanent chilled slab outdoor rink. Stantec has the experience, technical skill and capacity to provide the needed services and is part of the City's approved consultant pool. The attached proposal describes the scope of services and fees for their work on this project. Recommendation: Accept the proposal. Budget Impact: Stantec's proposal to complete the design and bidding services is based on a not to exceed amount of $153,800. The approved 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan includes $110,000 for engineering, legal and administrative (ELA) costs and includes funding 175 through the Storm Drainage Fund, Park Asset Fund and Park Development Fund. The additional costs are related to the engineering design services necessary for the permanent chilled slab outdoor rink. Attachments: Stantec Proposal for Design and Bidding Services Shakopee Lions Park CIP Sheets 176 Stantec December 29, 2025 Mr. Micah Heckman Assistant City Engineer 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Hello, Micah. Stantec Consultina Services Inc. 733 Marquette Ave Suite 1000 Minneapolis MN 55402-2309 Reference: Lions Park Parking Lot Improvements — Design and Bidding Services Project Understanding Stantec appreciates the opportunity to provide this proposal for professional service to the City of Shakopee to assist with improvements to the parking lots and development of a new outdoor ice rink at the Lions Park. The improvements to the facility are anticipated to include a mill and overlay of the main northern parking lot, an expansion to the north of the main northern parking lot and a full depth reclamation improvement of the southeastern lot to improve the parking surface and create ADA compliant connections to the adjacent park amenities. The project will also include improvements to the stormwater management system to accommodate these projects, including replacing the existing discharge line from the splashpad. The facility improvements will also include constructing an outdoor refrigerated ice rink in the main northern parking lot. B32 Engineering Group will provide the ice rink design services for the project as a subconsultant to Stantec (see attached). This proposal is prepared to develop construction documents (opinion of probable construction costs, plans and specifications), prepare permitting applications, and provide bidding assistance for the project. Scope of Services: Stantec's scope includes the following; Task 1: Preliminary Design Building on the concept plans, Stantec will work with the project team to prepare the design documents, identify design details, layouts, and materials. Work included in this task include: • Refining the design layout drawings to incorporate the various elements of the improvement project. • Preparing preliminary grading and drainage plans. Design with community in mind 177 December 29, 2025 Mr. Micah Heckman Page 2 of 6 Reference: Lions Park Improvements — Design and Bidding Services • Develop a draft stormwater management plan to meet Lower Minnesota River Watershed District and Scott County requirements. • Prepare 60% Plan Set and list of specifications. • Develop a 60% quantities and Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPC). • Begin permit application preparation to ensure necessary permits are ready for construction. • Coordinate with project team to determine locations of additional soil borings (if needed) and coordinate with the geotechnical engineer for additional soil improvements. • Participate in bi-weekly meetings with City Staff to review project progress and design decisions. Stantec will develop the following plan sheets for preliminary design: o Site Plan o Erosion Control Plan o Grading Plan o Storm Sewer Plan o Site Electrical Plan o Ice Rink Plan (B32 Engineering Group) Electrical design will include power to the refrigeration system, design of salvaged overhead lights, design of electrical service for the site/refrigeration equipment, and design of replacement light fixture near the splash pad and new power to another light near the splash pad bathrooms. We will develop quantities and an Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPC) based on the conceptual layout broken out by project components. Stantec will then meet with City staff to review a 60% design plan and OPC before preparing construction documents Meetings: • 3 virtual or in -person meeting Deliverables: • 60% OPC • 60% Plan Set • List of specifications Figure 1: Proposed Improvements Area (as attached) Task 2: Final Design/Construction Documents In construction documents phase, final construction details will be added to the plans based on the decisions made from the previous task. Objectives for this task include: • Prepare 100% Plan Set • Prepare front end documents and associated discipline specific technical specifications • Develop a 100% quantities and Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPC) • Finalize the stormwater management plan to meet Lower Minnesota River Watershed District and Scott County requirements • Participate in bi-weekly meetings with City Staff to review project progress and design decisions Design with community in mind 178 December 29, 2025 Mr. Micah Heckman Page 3 of 6 Reference: Lions Park Improvements — Design and Bidding Services Stantec will develop the following plan sheets for Construction Documents: • Site Plan • Erosion Control Plan and SWPPP • Grading Plan • Storm Sewer Plan • Site Electrical Plan • Ice Rink Plan (632 Engineering Group) • Associated Detail Sheets Meetings: • 3 virtual or in -person meeting Deliverables: • 100% OPC • 100% Construction Documents Plan Set • Final Project Manual with front end and technical specifications • Permit applications Task 3: Bidding This task involves the coordination of soliciting contractor bids for the construction of the improvement project. The task includes: • Preparation of Advertisement for Bids and coordination of publication • Respond to potential bidder questions and issue addenda as needed • Attendance of virtual bid opening and completion of the bid opening process • Preparation of bid tabulation Meetings: • 1 virtual bid opening meeting Deliverables: • Bid tabulation Stantec will work to start the design development as soon as possible upon being authorized. Stantec will provide these services on an hourly not to exceed basis for Stantec services and on a lump sum as a percentage of progress for subcontractors unless noted otherwise. Stantec will invoice monthly, for each task listed above for the actual work completed. Any applicable state and local taxes are not included. Additional services outside of this scope of work or requests from the Owner or others will be considered additional services. Stantec will not proceed with additional services or services outside of this scope of work without approval form the Owner. All work will be completed in accordance with the Professional Services Agreement with the City of Shakopee. Design with community in mind 179 December 29, 2025 Mr. Micah Heckman Page 4 of 6 Reference: Lions Park Improvements — Design and Bidding Services Task Description I Estimated Costs 1 Preliminary Design* $66,300 2 Final Design/Construction Documents $80,200 3 Bidding $7,300 Total (3 ` $153,800 *Note: For preliminary design, Stantec assumed $10,000 soil borings and geotechnical evaluation for refrigerated ice rink from Braun Intertec. Final costs may be adjusted once proposal is received. Clarifications Anything not specifically identified as included as part of Stantec's Scope of Service is not included, such as (but not limited to) • Taxes, permit fees • Additional submittals/iterations • Outdoor Ice Rink Roof/Cover design related costs • Landscape design/screening of refrigeration system • Construction Administration scope and costs buIulptWuIls Note the following assumptions were made in preparation of this proposal. If any of these assumptions are found inaccurate, the level of effort required to complete the tasks as outlined may change, potentially with great significance. • The City of Shakopee will be providing a bid recommendation and award letter. The City will prepare contract documents and coordinate execution of contracts with City staff, attorney, and contractor. • Permit fees will be paid by the City of Shakopee. • A Department of Labor and Industry Plumbing Permit is assumed to not be required. • Advertising for Bid fees will be paid by the City of Shakopee. • A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Stormwater Permit will be obtained and paid for by the selected Contractor. • The City will coordinate with the high voltage power company for any potential easement encroachments for the outdoor ice rink. • No wetland delineation or mitigation is included or will be required for this project. • No floodplain modeling is included. • Front End Documents/Contracts for the bidding documents will be provided by the City of Shakopee. Schedule The following schedule is anticipated for the project: • Preliminary Design: January/February 2026 Design with community in mind 180 December 29, 2025 Mr. Micah Heckman Page 5 of 6 Reference: Lions Park Improvements — Design and Bidding Services • Final Design/Construction Documents: March/April 2026 • Bidding: April/May 2026 • Construction Start: Summer 2026 This schedule is an estimation and may be impacted by scope changes, permitting timelines, easements, and reviews. Thanks again for the opportunity to present this proposal. If you have any questions at all, please don't hesitate to ask. Regards, STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. Steven Healand, PE Senior Associate Phone: (763) 479-4237 Steven.Hegland@stantec.com Design with community in mind Mark Schroeher, PE Associate Phone: (651) 395-5216 mark.schroeher@stantec.com 181 December 29, 2025 Mr. Micah Heckman Page 6 of 6 Reference: Lions Park Improvements — Design and Bidding Services By signing this proposal, City of Shakopee authorizes Stantec to proceed with the services herein described and the work will be completed in accordance with the existing Professional Services Agreement. This proposal is accepted and agreed on the day of Per: Signature Design with community in mind 182 LUCO, {uo{sMnNN LGGSS NW 'I,'inowAld OCl a{InS'N on cd uos1.1, aup 3WdN111,1 6i itA Wig L 6M4\aV�\£LSL0S£b I \s{oafoaa�paaoys\ Ipss{dd- IbZOsn\\ :au.aou wd£5�L -SZOZ/EL/LI � Engineering Group December 22, 2025 Revision 1 December 23, 2025 Mr. Mark Schroeher Associate, Senior Civil Engineer Sta ntec 733 S Marquette Ave Unit 1000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Via email: mark.schroeher@stantec.com RE: Professional Engineering Services Proposal: Lions Park Improvement Project, Shakopee MN Ice System Design Services Dear Mr. Schroeher: We are pleased to submit this proposal to provide professional engineering services for the above -mentioned project. The following proposal outlines our understanding of the project by defining the scope of our services and key assumptions made in preparing this proposal and fees associated with the Scope of Work. am 11T RAI, ENGINEERING GROUP, IMF Our team has extensive and specialty experience in programming, evaluations, concept design, and design and construction phase services for all types of ice rink projects. Successfully completing over 450 ice rink related projects, our team, led by Scott Ward, is a leader in the ice rink industry providing some of the most innovative, cost-effective, and energy -efficient design solutions. We know these unique facilities very well, have a thorough understanding of their needs and performance requirement and have the in-depth, specialty experience required to successfully complete this project for you, Stantec, the City of Shakopee, and other project partners. We have submitted to you our complete Ice Rink Statement of Qualifications for your review. We would be happy to provide additional information regarding projects, references, etc. at your request. B32 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., 2211 O'Neil Road, Hudson, WI 54016 t 651.256.3090 f 715.808.0842 www.B32eng.com 1 184 Engineering Group Some of the notable projects that we are currently working on, or have recently completed, include the following: Professional NHL (New and Renovation) Baptist Health Ice Plex Florida Panthers Ft. Lauderdale FL (2 sheets) Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul MN (MN Wild) American Airlines Center, Dallas TX (Dallas Stars, study) Ice Den, Coral Springs FL Minor Professional ECHL, SPHL, AHL(New and renovation) Port Wentworth Ice Cove, Port Wentworth GA (2 sheets) Owens Ice Arena, Peoria IL (2 sheets) Pelham Civic Complex, Pelham AL (2 sheets) Blue Cross Arena, Rochester NY Mohegan Sun Arena, Wilkes Barre PA College Division 1 (New) Northeastern University, Boston MA Sacred Heart University, Fairfield CT Augustana University, Sioux Falls SD Kalamazoo Event Center, MI (Western Mich and Kalamazoo Wings) University of St Thomas, St. Paul MN (2 sheets) Divisions 1 and 3 College (Renovation) 3MAM at Mariucci University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN Berry Event Center University of Northern Michigan, Marquette MI Ingalls Rink -Yale University, New Haven CT Baker Rink -Princeton University, Princeton NJ Conte Forum -Boston College, Boston MA Carlson Center -University of Alaska Fairbanks, AK Tuttle North Ice Arena SUNY Brockport NY Sage Rink, Hamilton College, Hamilton NY Bird Arena, Ohio University, Athens OH National Hockey Center, St. Cloud University, MN (2 sheets) Tuttle North Ice Arena SUNY Brockport NY College Prep (Renovation) Nobles Greenough School, Dedham MA Community Facilities (Renovation) Olympic Center, Lake Placid NY (4 sheets + oval) Oakton Ice Arena, Oakton IL (2 sheets) EPIC, Fort Collins CO (2 sheets) National Sports Center, Super Rink Blaine MN (8 sheets) Joliet Ice Arena, Joliet IL Bloomington Ice Gardens, Bloomington MN (3 sheets) Maple Grove Community Center, Maple Grove MN (3 sheets) Hoyt Lakes Ice Rink, Hoyt Lakes MN Hermantown Ice Rink, Hermantown MN (2 sheets) Northwoods Credit Union Arena, Cloquet MN (2 sheets) Marathon County Ice Rinks, Wausau WI (2 sheets) Litchfield Civic Center, Litchfield MN Webster Groves Ice Rink, Webster Groves MO Kirkwood Ice Rink, Kirkwood MO Braemar Arena, Edina MN (4 sheets) Playland Casino, Rye NY (3 sheets) B32 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., 2211 O'Neil Road, Hudson, WI 54016 t 651.256.3090 f 715.808.0842 www.B32eng.com Woodbridge Community Center, Woodbridge NJ Oak Lawn Ice Arena, Oak Lawn IL Graham Arena, Rochester MN (2 sheets) Community Facilities (New) Mosaic Quarters, Tucson AZ (3 sheets) Ice Cove, Richmond VA (2 sheets) Bowie Ice Arena, Bowie MD Sports Complex, Fargo ND (2 sheets) Mobile Arena, Mobile AL (10,000 seats) Palm Beach Gardens Iceplex, Palm Beach Gardens FL (2 sheets) East Brunswick NJ (2 sheets) Car Shield Ice Rink, Chesterfield MO (2 sheets) Northfield, MN Belmont, MA Woodman's Community Center, Janesville WI (2 sheets) Minnesota Hockey Hall of Fame Rink, Minneapolis MN Outdoor Facilities (New) Middle Park Landing, Bettendorf IA (ice rink) Jacobson Plaza, Sioux Falls SD (skating trail) Landmark Ice Rink, Washington DC (skating trail) Heartland of America, Omaha NE (skating trail) Warwick Ice Rink, Warwick RI (ice rink) Windows on the Waterfront, Holland MI (skating trail) Laskar Pool and Ice Rink, Central Park NY (ice rink) The Rivers Edge Ice Rink, Davenport IA (ice rink) Central Plaza Ice Skating Loop, Marion IA (skating trail) Schenley Ice Rink, Pittsburgh PA (ice rink) Steinberg Pavilion Ice Rink, St. Louis MO (ice rink) Elm Street Plaza Ice Rink, Cincinnati OH (ice rink) City Park Ice Skating Ribbon, Bondurant IA (ice rink) Red Arrow Park, Milwaukee WI (ice rink) Ewart Park, Joplin MO (skating trail) Studies Panthers Ice Den, Coral Springs FL Pasadena Ice Skating Rink, Pasadena CA University of Southern Maine, Portland ME American Airlines Arena, Dallas TX Soldotna Regional Sports Complex, AK Lynah Rink - Cornell University NY Ames Ice Arena, Ames IA Mennen Sports Center, Morristown NJ Glacier Ice Rink, Missoula MT Winter Lodge, Palo Alto CA University of Illinois Urbana -Champaign M Health Fairview Sports Center, Woodbury MN BOK Center, Tulsa OK West Seneca NY Richmond Ice Zone, Richmond VA 2 185 Engineering Group Pat Odonnell Civic Center, Ironwood MI Resch Center, Green Bay WI We can provide you with references for any one of our many successfully completed ice rink projects at your request. Here are a few references to start: 1. Sharks Ice at San Jose (San Jose Sharks Practice Facility, 2 new sheets and renovated 3 existing sheets). Reference: Jon Gustafson, Vice President, Sharks Ice LLC, 408.999.6751. jgustafson@sharksice.com 2. Great Park Ice and Sports Complex, Irvine CA (Anaheim Ducks practice facility, 4 sheets), Reference: Art Trottier, Vice President — The Rinks. 714.518.3201 attrottier@the-rinks.com 3. Grand Casino Arena and TRIA Rink, St. Paul, MN (MN Wild Game and Practice Facilities) Reference: Travis Larson, Ice Operations and Event Manager, Xcel Energy Center, 651-726-8160, tlarson@wild.com 4. Baptist Health IcePlex, Fort Lauderdale, FL (Panthers Practice Facility) Reference: Melissa Fitzgerald, General Manager, Florida Panthers. 954.835.8515 fitzgeraldm@floridapanthersc.com 5. Ice Den Scottsdale (Arizona Coyotes Practice Facility, 3 sheets) and Ice Den Chandler, AZ Reference: Mike O'Hearn — Executive Vice President Rainy Partners, LLC 602-980-7179 mikeo@rainypartners.com 6. Community First Igloo, Jacksonville FL (Icemen — AHL) Reference: Eddie Hawkins, General Manager O.949.774.1610 eddie@communityfirstigloo.com 7. 3M Arena at Mariucci, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Reference: Craig Flor, Athletic Facility Manager, 612-625-8365, florx003@umn.edu 8. Martire Family Arena, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield CT Reference: Marco Izzo, Executive Director of University Construction, izzom2@sacredheart.edu O.203.396.8467 9. Berry Event Center, Northern Michigan University Reference: Kathy Richards, Associate Vice President. O.906.227.1237 kathrich@nmu.edu 10. Bloomington Ice Gardens, MN Reference: Todd Baer, Maintenance Supervisor, 952.563.8787 tbaer@bloomingtonMN.gov Reference: Lenny Schmitz Ice Garden Manager, 952.563.8787 Ischmitz@BloomingtonMN.gov 11. Guidant John Rose Oval, Roseville MN Reference: Matt Johnson Director of Parks and Recreation, 651.792.7102 Matthew.Johnson@cityofroseville.com 12. Apple Valley Sports Arena, Apple Valley, MN Complete Reference: Brian Christianson, Facility Manager M.612.270.6078 bchristiansom@ci.apple- valley.mn.us. 13. St. Louis Rec Center, St. Louis Park, MN. Complete. Reference: Jason Eisold, Facilities Superintendent Parks & Recreation Department. O.952.924.2547 jeisold@stlouisparkmn.gov 14. Super Rink, National Sports Center, Blaine MN Reference: Neil Ladd, Senior Director, National Sports Center, O.763.458.6618 nladd@nscsports.org Reference: Pete Carlson, Ice Arena Operations and Programs Director, Super Rink O.763.785.5600, pcarlson@superink.org. 15. Braemar Arena, Edina MN Reference: Jesse Bucholz, General Manager O.952.833.9502 JBuchholz@EdinaMN.gov 16. Herb Brooks National Hockey Center, St. Cloud State University MN Reference: Cory Portner, Director O.320.308.5118 cmportner@stcloudstate.edu B32 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., 2211 O'Neil Road, Hudson, WI 54016 t 651.256.3090 f 715.808.0842 www.B32eng.com 3 186 Engineering Group TEAM MEMRFR' Principal and Vice President of B32 Engineering Group, Inc., Scott Ward will work closely with you and the design team on this project. Scott has over 30 years of experience in civil and mechanical engineering fields. He has extensive knowledge of public facilities (e.g., ice arenas, water and wastewater treatment, community centers, aquatic centers, etc.) and associated feasibility and evaluation studies, project development, funding applications, and the design and construction process. His education and engineering experience uniquely qualifies him for the specialized design requirements of ice systems. He has been involved in over 450 ice rink/ice skating projects since 1997, including professional practice facilities, Division 1 college venues, single and multi - sheet community arenas, and outdoor ice rinks. Scott is integrally involved in each ice rink project. In addition to Scott's professional expertise, he was also an avid coach and coaching coordinator for 16 years; is a lifelong hockey player and supporter of youth hockey. The application of this practical insight help ensure each facility, and its systems are designed to meet your needs, operate successfully and be a gathering place for the community. Education Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, 2000 Bachelor of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, 1995 Registration Registered Professional Engineer in: AL, AK, AZ, CO, CT, FL, IA, IL, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MT, MO, NC, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NM, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SD, TN, TX, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY. Professional Affiliations American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Minnesota Ice Arena Managers Association (MIAMA) Wisconsin Ice Arena Managers Association (WIAMA) North East Ice Skating Mangers Association (NEISMA) Ice Skating Institute (ISI) United States Ice Rink Association (formerly STAR) Minnesota Recreation and Park Association (MRPA) Examples of Ice Arena Projects: See 632 Engineering Group, Inc. Ice Rink Statement of Qualifications for more information. B32 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., 2211 O'Neil Road, Hudson, WI 54016 t 651.256.3090 f 715.808.0842 www.B32eng.com 4 187 Engineering Group PROJECT UNDERSTANDING Stantec is working with the City of Shakopee on improvements to Lions Park located at 1103 Adams Street, Shakopee MN. As part the improvements the City is planning to add a new refrigerated outdoor rink. The facility will operate the typical season of Nov 15 to Feb 1. The City would like to extend the season to Feb 28th if possible. After the initial call with City last week, the following decisions were made, or information was provided: 1. One (1) permanent outdoor standard NHL sized (200x85) refrigerated ice rink floor. 2. One (1) permanent set of dasher board system with protective netting all around with no shielding. 3. One (1) temporary rental chiller system will be used at least for the first few years. 4. Soils. The first 5' is mainly fill material and under that material is rocky sand. Additional soil borings will be taken if determined necessary by the geotechnical engineer. 5. Electrical power to the site is 480v, 3 phase. 6. The City will use a pull behind resurfacer with tractor and dump snow on site. No melt pit is needed. 7. No roof structure. Potential future fabric roof structure by others. 8. The rink will never be fully enclosed so a subfloor heating system is not required. 9. The City prefers a slope surface to minimize bird baths during the summer months. 10. The City will bring in lighting for the rink area. Stantec has requested a proposal from B32 Engineering Group, Inc. to provide design services related to the new ice system. The new ice system includes connections for a rental chiller unit, a permanent concrete ice rink floor system, and a dasher board system. We will work closely with Stantec and the design team on this project. Stantec will provide all front end and Division 0 and 1 document and assemble bidding documents, etc. Related design work by other design team members (services not included in this proposal): 1. Building and structural systems including roof structures, pavilions, storage rooms, mechanical rooms, etc. 2. Footings and Foundation wall for outdoor ice rink (if required). Discussed installed a concrete curb or concrete apron around the rink floor since its located in an asphalt parking lot. 3. Perimeter concrete surrounding outdoor ice rink. 632 to provide standard detail for concrete surrounds and best practice for dasher board locations — Stantec to design the perimeter concrete, B32 to design the dasher board system and anchor system. 4. Concrete pad and subgrade for temporary chiller. B32 will provide recommendations for the concrete pad. 5. Structural engineering for footing and wall penetrations, condenser curb and foundations, etc. 6. Subgrade and soil preparation beneath the rink floor. B32 will design the ice rink floor section that includes 6" thick concrete cold floor and 4" thick insulation layer. Stantec will design the subgrade. B32 will respond to questions from the geotechnical engineer. 7. Subsoil drainage system beneath the rink floor. Geotechnical engineer to make B32 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., 2211 O'Neil Road, Hudson, WI 54016 t 651.256.3090 f 715.808.0842 www.B32eng.com 5 188 Engineering Group recommendations. 8. Floor drains near the rink floor. 9. Concrete snow melt pit and grating system for dumping the ice shavings from the resurfacer. 10. Snow melt pit heating system. Recommend separate system from the refrigeration system. 11. Code compliant refrigeration room. Not required for temporary outdoor chiller system. 12. HVAC, plumbing and electrical systems for refrigeration room. Not required for temporary outdoor chiller system. 13. HVAC, plumbing and electrical systems for resurfacer room. 14. Electrical service to the refrigeration system or temporary chiller system 15. Exterior lighting systems for outdoor ice rink and adjacent spaces. 16. BMS connection to refrigeration system control system if the City will be connecting this system to a city wide BMS or facility BMS. 17. Connection to fire alarm system. 18. Scoreboard (Typically work with the Owners preferred vendor). 19. Skate rental and skate sharpening systems. 20. Skatetile flooring surrounding the outdoor ice rink. 21. Resurfacer, edger and other ice making equipment. 22. Landscape design including fencing/screenwall and landscaping around temporary chiller system. Project Schedule — as discussed with Stantec prior to and during the meeting with the City Jan 6 or 20, 2026 - Stantec Proposal Approved by the City Jan, 2026 - start Design Mar 15 — final design complete Mar 16 -Apr 12 — bid period Apr 13 — Apr 27 — construction contracts developed and signed. Apr 28 — start construction Nov 7 — start cooling down rink floor Nov 13- start making ice Nov 21, 2026 - Ice is ready to skate Cost Estimate We estimate the ice system construction cost to be as follows in 2026 dollars. Estimates do not include engineering, design and other soft costs, etc. Synthetic -based commercial grade refrigeration system: Rental Snow melt pit heating system: Not incl Concrete ice rink floor 200'x85' (6" conc, 4" insulation, HDPE pipe): $900,000 Dasher board system (community -level): $375,000 Subtotal $1,275,000 20% Design and Construction Contingency $255,000 Total Estimate $1,530,000 B32 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., 2211 O'Neil Road, Hudson, WI 54016 t 651.256.3090 f 715.808.0842 www.B32eng.com 6 189 Engineering Group SCOPE OF WORK As Ice Rink Engineers and Consultants, 632 Engineering Group, Inc. will provide the specialized design required for the ice system including the design of the ice rink floor system and the dasher board systems. B32 Engineering Group, Inc. will provide a step-by-step design approach as described below: Step 1— Preliminary Design Phase During this step B32 Engineering Group, Inc. will: 1.1 Meeting 1 (in -person) Meeting with you, the City, the design team and any other stakeholders to discuss the ice system in more detail including the following. 1. Temporary chiller options. 2. Ice rink floor system design including size and dimensions of ice sheet, piping materials, piping connections, header designs, concrete, incorporation into parking lot, etc. 3. Dasher board systems technology, options and quality of systems and construction is ever changing. We will discuss in detail dasher board system components and options including layout and door locations; frame construction and material options; box dimensions; shielding type and height; materials for facing, caprail and kick plate; accessories such as netting and carts; and a discussion on new trends and innovations in dasher board system design and safety. 4. The scope of work for related electrical, structural and architectural systems as needed to support the outdoor ice rink system, temporary chiller system, etc. 1.2 Design Meetings: Additional virtual meetings with you, the City, the design team, and any stakeholders to discuss project progress. 1.3 Prepare preliminary design drawings and technical specifications in CSI format. 1.4 Prepare preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Costs and updated project schedule. Step 2 — Final Design Phase During this step 632 Engineering Group, Inc. will: 2.1 Prepare final working drawings for the ice rink floor system and dasher board system and piping connections to the temporary chiller system including drawings and the technical specifications (Division 13). Your firm will generate all general conditions, contracts, and Division 0 and 1 section. 2.2 Design Meetings: Virtual meetings with you, the City, the design team, and any stakeholders to discuss project progress. 2.3 Prepare final Opinion of Probable Construction costs and project schedule. B32 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., 2211 O'Neil Road, Hudson, WI 54016 t 651.256.3090 f 715.808.0842 www.B32eng.com 7 190 Engineering Group Step 3 — Bid Phase During this step B32 Engineering Group, Inc. will: 3.1 Provide recommendation on bidding and award schedule. 3.2 Answer questions from contractors, suppliers, design team, the City, etc. during the bidding period. 3.3 We did not include a site visit for a pre -bid meeting with the contractors in this proposal. 3.4 Review the bid results and provide input on award of construction contract. Step 4 — Construction Services Not included in this proposal. ASSUMPTIONS This proposal is based on the following assumptions. GETTING STARTED - Prior to starting the work, B32 Engineering Group, Inc. will be provided with full information regarding your firm's and client's requirements including any special or extraordinary considerations for the Project or special services needed and will be provided with all pertinent existing data. • INFORMATION - B32 Engineering Group, Inc. will be relying on CAD files and topographic surveys completed and prepared by others. B32 Engineering Group, Inc. assumes no liability for the accuracy of such drawings or surveys. EXCLUSIONS - In preparing this proposal, certain items have been excluded from the scope of services that may or may not be required. Should these services become necessary, 632 Engineering Group Inc. can provide them as Additional Services. The following services have been excluded from this proposal: Design of the refrigeration system for the ice rink floor system. B32 will provide design criteria for the selection of a temporary chiller system. Construction Administration phase services Evaluation of site and soil conditions in or near the building Rebates, grants, or other funding applications Energy modeling and calculations Life cycle cost analysis. Permit applications Commissioning of systems. We did not include commissioning in this proposal Local and State code review meetings Environmental reviews, reports or permits. Building energy simulation. ■ Sampling, laboratory and on -site material testing or performance and intrusive testing B32 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., 2211 O'Neil Road, Hudson, WI 54016 t 651.256.3090 f 715.808.0842 www.B32eng.com 8 191 Enpiincoring Group Hazardous material testing Surveying Record plans or as-builts Project advocacy beyond the normal standard of care. ■ All other exclusions stated in the Project Understanding section of this proposal. COST OF SERVICES We propose the following fixed fees for the services based on an estimated 2026 construction cost of $1.275M + contingencies as outlined above. TASK Fee PRELIMINARY DESIGN (STEP 1) $18,200 FINAL DESIGN (STEP 2) $27,300 BIDDING ASSISTANCE (STEP 3) $2,900 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION (STEP 4) Not incl TOTAL FIXED FEE SERVICES $48,400 Conditions of Proposed Fee: EXPENSES - Reimbursable expenses are in addition to the fee above. Except mileage for in - person meetings are included in the fixed fee above. Additional services expenses will be invoiced in accordance with our standard fee schedule. Taxes not included in fee. PAYMENTS — All payments due to B32 Engineering Group, Inc. shall be made within 45 days after receipt of invoice. Services will be invoiced once per month. Finance charges will be applied to all payments not received within 45 days of invoicing. B32 Engineering Group, Inc. shall have the right to suspend work on the project upon invoice past due more than sixty (90) days from presentation, unless or until B32 Engineering Group, Inc. is satisfied that payment is forthcoming. ADDITIONAL SERVICES — Additional Services, if authorized in advance, will be billed in accordance with our standard fee schedule. FEE SCHEDULE - The attached fee schedule is valid through December 31, 2026. Any services furnished after December 31, 2026, will be charged in accordance with our 2027 fee schedule. We will not increase any item on the fee schedule by more than 5% per year for work performed in 2027. The fixed fee will remain unchanged for 2026. QUALIFICATIONS — The proposed construction administration fee is based on the Owner hiring an experienced ice rink contractor meeting the qualifications of B32 Engineering Group, Inc. standard Section 131811— Ice Rink General Requirements that in general states the contractor must have successfully completed five (5) ice rink projects of similar scope in the past five (5) years. B32 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., 2211 O'Neil Road, Hudson, WI 54016 t 651.256.3090 f 715.808.0842 www.B32eng.com 9 192 Engineering Group INSURANCE. This proposal is based on the following insurance coverage carried by 632 Engineering Group, Inc. Category Insurance Limits Comp General Liability and Bodily Injury $2M each occurrence $4M general aggregate Professional Liability $5M each claim $5M aggregate Umbrella Liability $2M each occurrence $2M aggregate This proposal is based upon completion of our services by December 31, 2026. This document serves as record of the basic terms of our agreement. Upon receipt of a countersigned copy of this letter, we assume you will provide B32 Engineering Group, Inc. with an agreement for review and comment. B32 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. IS BEST VALUE FOR STANTEC AND THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE In addition to having an extensive resume of over 450 very successful ice rink projects of all types and sizes nationwide, B32 Engineering Group, Inc. brings to your project: Extensive ice rink design and construction experience providing a clear understanding of what works and what doesn't work. Extensive single -sheet and multi -sheet ice rink design experience providing the knowledge of proper pumping and flow design to allow individual flow and temperature control to each sheet of ice and central refrigeration system design maximizing system performance and efficiency. As one example, we were involved in the ice system design for two 4 -sheet complexes with very tight budgets and two different building types. I have designed many multi -sheet facilities. Extensive experience with natural refrigerants such as CO2-based ice systems and ammonia - based ice systems. Experience with codes, regulations, statues and ordinances applicable to indoor ice arena facilities. Personal attention. The Owner of B32 Engineering Group, Inc., Scott Ward, will be assigned to design and manage this project for you. This project will be a priority for the 632 Engineering Group, Inc. Performance. 632 congratulates the following 2025 Champions and is proud to have designed the ice they skate on: Stanley Cup Champions — Florida Panthers PWHL Walter Cup Champions — Minnesota Frost IIHF Women's World Championship - Team USA Women's National Hockey Team NCAA (Men's) — Western Michigan University Broncos NCAA (Women's) — University of Wisconsin Badgers ACHA M2 (Men's) — Lindenwood University Lions B32 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., 2211 O'Neil Road, Hudson, WI 54016 t 651.256.3090 f 715.808.0842 www.B32eng.com 10 193 Mio Engineering Group Minnesota High School Class AA (Boys) — Moorhead Spuds Minnesota High School Class A (Boys) — St. Cloud Cathedral Crusaders Upcoming 2026 IIHF World Junior Championship — Xcel Energy Center and 3M Arena at Mariucci, University of Minnesota 2023 Winter World University Games — Olympic Center, Lake Placid NY Experience and passion fosters innovation. B32 Engineering Group, Inc. was the first in the ice rink industry to: Design an ice system that regenerates a desiccant system using waste heat recovered from the refrigeration system in place of natural gas. (Northfield Ice Arena- MN) Design a conversion (direct to indirect) of an existing Holmsten Ice Rink's direct refrigeration system that uses the existing equipment to minimize costs with little or no loss in operating efficiency. This provided the City with the widest range of options for replacing or renovating the existing ice system in the North Arena. (Lund Arena - Gustavus Adolphus College -MN) Design a geothermal -based ice system without a well field and using a city water source, maximizing waste heat recovery and providing superior efficiency and reliability without losing performance. (Brooklyn Park Activity Center -MN) Design a geothermal -based ice system that uses industrial grade refrigeration technology for a long -life span and ammonia refrigerant to maximize efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. (Burnsville Ice Center -MN) Design of first CO2 -based ice systems in the United States. B32 Engineering Group, Inc. has designed 11 total CO2-based ice systems with the first in 2014. (Anchorage AK, Eagle River AK, Palmer AK, St. Michael MN, Princeton University, Yale University, Northeastern University, St.Louis MO, etc.) Design ice systems for LEED certified ice arena facilities including Bentley University MA (Platinum), Amsoil Arena -Duluth MN (Gold), Great Park Ice & Sport Anaheim CA (Silver) and others. 632 Engineering Group, Inc. is always striving to apply sustainable practices including waste heat recovery, water reuse, using recycled water to make the ice sheet, geothermal, natural light, etc. Thank you for the opportunity to be involved in this project. We are confident you will find our qualifications, experience and reputation at the top of the industry. We encourage you to call any references on any project that we have worked on. If this proposal meets with your approval and is consistent with your understanding, please sign and return an original copy of this letter by mail. In the event we do not receive a signed copy of this letter, and we are authorized to begin work verbally, we will assume the terms and conditions of this proposal have been accepted by you. B32 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., 2211 O'Neil Road, Hudson, WI 54016 t 651.256.3090 f 715.808.0842 www.B32eng.com 11 194 Engineering Group We are very excited about this opportunity, and we look forward to personally sharing our experience and knowledge of ice systems with you, Stantec and the City of Shakopee. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me on my mobile on 651.492.1376. Sincerely, 632 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. Scott A. Ward, P.E. President Enclosure: 2026 Professional Services Fee Schedule We can provide you with our Ice Rink Statement of Date Agreed to and accepted, By Title Qualifications at your request. B32 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., 2211 O'Neil Road, Hudson, WI 54016 t 651.256.3090 f 715.808.0842 www.B32eng.com 12 195 APPENDIX A B32 2026 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE Effective: January 1, 2026, December 31, 2026 HOURLY RATES LABOR CATEGORY HOURLY RATES Principal $260-$290 Senior Project Engineer/Project Manager $180-$210 Senior Designer/Senior Project Coordinator $165-$185 Project Engineer/Project Manager $145-$165 Designer $100-$120 Intern $85-$95 Marketing $110-$130 Administrative $90-$110 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Engineering Group Reimbursable expenses include, but are not limited to the following: Mileage (current IRS rate). Parking/Tolls Travel Expenses: airfare, lodging, rental cars, and electronic communication in connection with the project. Meals will be billed at $75 per diem. Reproductions, plots, report materials and standard form documents as outlined in the table below. Item Size Black & White Color Photocopies/Printing 8.5 x 11 $0.37 $1.37 11x17 $0.53 $2.63 Plots and Scans over 11x17 in size At cost of outside service Outside services (printing, testing, etc.). Delivery Services (UPS, FedEx, etc.). Subconsultant Services. Other similar direct project -related expenditures. Reimbursable expenses are billable at 12% over cost and per diem. All payments due to B32 Engineering Group, Inc. shall be made within 45 days after receipt of invoice. B32 invoices monthly. These rates are subject to adjustment each year on January 1. 196 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name PR -26-002 Lions Park Parking Improvements Total Project Cost $500,000 Department Park Development Fund Category Planning & Development Status Active Fund Park Development Fund Contact Director of Planning & Development Type Lions Park Priority 1 - Have to do Useful Life 20 years Description Lions Park parking lot needs to be expanded to handle the heavy useage. As one of the busiest and the park with the most activites, which includes SandVenture, Dic Golf, Fun for All Playground, Pickleball, ice skating and trails, the parking lot is not adequate to handle the growing interest in the park. The Lion Park Master Plan called for expansion of the parking lot. Justification The heavy usage of facilities in the park by residents from throughout Shakopee requires additional pakring Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Engineering/Administration Total Funding Sources Park Development Fund 2026 450,000 50,000 500,000 2027 2028 2029 2030 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Total 450,000 50,000 500,000 Total 2026 500,000 500,000 2027 2028 2029 2030 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Total 500,000 500,000 Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 26 197 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name PR -26-002 Lions Park Parking Improvements Contact Department Director of Planning & Development Park Development Fund 27 Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 198 2026 thru 2030 Project Details Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name PR -26-003 Lions Park Outdoor Rink Total Project Cost $750,000 Department Park Development Fund Category Facilities Status Active Contact Director of Planning & Development Type Lions Park Priority 2 - Smart to do Useful Life 20 years Description Semi -permanent regulation sized chilled outdoor ice skating rink with boards, mats and chiller to be installed in the Lions Park main parking lot from Halloween until mid -March (dependent on weather). Justification With the investments at SandVenture, this would allow the community room to be used, provides restroom access and access to Tommy's Restaurant. The chiller would be installed permanently in the parking lot and matts and boards will be pciked up and stored each year. Chilled ice should be viable from Halloween to mid -March depending on weather. This would allow parties, broom ball, open skating etc. Since the Community Center ice is so heavily used and flooded rinks last at most two months, this provides and outdoor experience while also using existing assets in a central location. Expenditures Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings Total Funding Sources Park Development Fund 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 750,000 0 0 0 0 750,000 0 0 0 0 Total 750,000 750,000 Total 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 750,000 0 0 0 0 750,000 0 0 0 0 Total 750,000 750,000 Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 28 199 2026 thru 2030 Capital Improvement Plan Shakopee, MN Project # Project Name PA -26-03 Annual Parking Lot Rehabilitation Total Project Cost $1,783,000 Department Park Asset Internal Serv. Fund Category Public Works Status Active Fund Park Asset IS Fund Contact City Engineer Type Improvement Priority 2 - Smart to do Useful Life 25 years Description Project includes the rehabilitation of the bituminous asphalt surfaces. The rehabilitation work includes removal of the pavement surface, full depth spot repair and patching, spot curb and gutter repair, upgrade of sidewalk/trail/pedestrian curb ramp, meet ADA requirements and a bituminous pavement reconstruction. 2026 - Scenic Heights Park parking lot and Lions Park SE parking lot (including splash pad outlet) 2027 - O'Dowd parking lot and Downtown Fuller/2nd Ave parking lot 2028 - Tahpah West parking lot and Riverview parking lot 2029- Boat Landing Parking Lot 2030 - 17th Ave Sports Complex Justification This is a continuation of the city's pavement preservation program to maintain existing infrastructure. The city must also reconstruct pedestrian ramp facilities with ADA transition plan adopted in 2018. Expenditures Improvements Engineering/Administration 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 731,000 112,000 289,000 210,000 283,000 1,625,000 71,000 12,000 26,000 20,000 29,000 158,000 Funding Sources Park Asset Internal Service Fund Storm Drainage Fund Total 802,000 124,000 315,000 230,000 312,000 1,783,000 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 652,000 124,000 315,000 230,000 312,000 1,633,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 Total 802,000 124,000 315,000 230,000 312,000 1,783,000 Budget Impact The bituminous pavements in the project area have significantly deteriorated. Patching or overlayment are no longer effective options to extend the life of the asphalt surface. These pavement areas require more than usual maintenance. Update the lighting, repair curbing, and required ADA improvements are generally unfunded mandates to improve accessibility and minimize liability. 142 Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software 200 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.p January 6, 2026 Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative's Operation Round Up Grant Award Andrea Harrell, Grants and Special Projects Coordinator Bill Reynolds Action to be considered: Adopt Resolution R2026-009, accepting Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative's Operation Round Up grant award and authorizing the City Administrator to execute the necessary contracts and agreements applicable to accept this award. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: At its October 21st, 2025 meeting, Council approved the application to the Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative's Operation Round Up grant via Resolution R2025-121. The Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative's Operation Round Up program allows customers to increase their MVEC bill payment with the additional funds being directed toward local organizations providing services in several categories including community service, economic development, education and youth, environment, emergency energy assistance, and disaster relief. The City of Shakopee was awarded $4,000 to assist in the purchase of a set of turnout gear to be utilized by a newly hired firefighter. Recommendation: Adopt Resolution R2026-009. Budget Impact: The grant requires a 0% match. Attachments: Resolution R2026-009 AWARD.docx Resolution R2025-121. pdf 201 RESOLUTION R2026-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE'S OPERATION ROUND UP GRANT AWARD WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee applied to the Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative's Operation Round Up grant, previously approved via Resolution R2025-121 on 21st day of October 2025, and WHEREAS, the grant award is to provide funding to support the purchase of a set of turnout gear to be utilized by a newly hired firefighter in the Fire Department, and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee was awarded the Operation Round Up grant for $4,000, and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee recognized a 0% match was required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: the City of Shakopee recognizes it has been awarded a grant by the Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative, agrees to accept the grant award and grant agreement for the above -referenced project, and authorizes the City Administrator to execute the necessary contracts and agreements applicable to accept this award. The City of Shakopee will comply with all applicable laws, requirements, and regulations as stated in the grant agreement. Adopted in the regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 6th day of January 2026. Matt Lehman, Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Richard Parsons City Clerk 202 Richard Parsons City Clerk RESOLUTION R2025-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING THE CITY TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE'S OPERATION ROUND UP GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee supports the application made to Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative's Operation Round Up grant program, and WHEREAS, the application is to obtain funding to purchase two sets of turnout gear to be utilized by firefighters in the Fire Department, and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee recognizes a 0% match is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: if the City of Shakopee is awarded a grant by the Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative, the City of Shakopee agrees to accept the grant award and may enter into an agreement with Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative for the above -referenced project. The City of Shakopee will comply with all applicable laws, requirements, and regulations as stated in the grant agreement. Adopted in the regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 21st day of October 2025. Matt Lehman, Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: 203 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 5.q January 6, 2026 Approve Off Sale and Sunday Liquor Licenses for SM Liquor LLC. dba Merwin Liquor. Heidi Emerson, Deputy City Clerk Action to be considered: Approve Off Sale and Sunday liquor licenses for SM Liquor LLC. dba Merwin Liquor, located at 471 Marschall Road. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: Staff has received an application off sale and Sunday liquor licenses for SM Liquor LLC. dba Merwin Liquor. The applications are in order and the fees have been paid. The Police Department ran a background investigation and found nothing that would prohibit off issuance of the licenses. Recommendation: Approve the above requested motion. Budget Impact: N/A Attachments: 204 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 10.a January 6, 2026 Jackson Township Development Area (Alternative Urban Areawide Review) AUAR Update Mark Noble, Senior Planner Michael Kerski, Director of Planning and Development Action to be considered: Adopt Resolution R2026-005, authorizing the adoption of the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Update for the Jackson Township Development Area. Motion Type: Simple Majority Background: The Environmental Quality Board (EQB) requires AUAR updates every five years. This original study was approved in 2020, therefore, staff is requesting review and approval of the update. The AUAR study area is approximately 2,890 acres in size located in the west and south area of the City of Shakopee and in Jackson Township (see attachment for area of study). The AUAR study area includes a range of land uses, from undeveloped open space and recreational areas to commercial and residential development. Several new developments have been built or approved since adoption of the 2020 AUAR. This update accounts for differences between built/approved development and the Build Scenario (Shakopee 2040 Plan) that was part of the original AUAR, as well as updated development/transportation planning projections. Staff and the city's consultant (SRF) have spent a significant amount of time working with associated agencies thru this review process and have attached the final draft of the AUAR Update document for your review, in addition to a resolution authorizing the adoption of the AUAR Update for the Jackson Township Development Area. Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommended forwarding a positive recommendation to the 205 City Council regarding the (AUAR) Update. Budget Impact: N/A Attachments: Draft AUAR Update Adoption Resolution Jackson Twp_v2.docx Jackson Township_Final_Revised_AUAR_Update_251223.pdf 206 RESOLUTION R2026-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AUTHORIZING THE ADOPTION OF THE ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW (AUAR) UPDATE FOR THE JACKSON TOWNSHIP DEVELOPMENT AREA WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee, as the responsible government unit (RGU), prepared a draft AUAR Update and Mitigation Plan Update pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410.3610 which identifies and assesses the environmental impacts and mitigation measures associated with the Jackson Township Development Area, and distributed this plan for comments, with notice published in the EQB Monitor for the required 10 -day public comment period; and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee prepared a revised/final AUAR Update and Mitigation Plan Update which included responses to agency comments received in connection with the draft AUAR Update and Mitigation Plan Update and will distribute final documents to state agencies and the Met Council following adoption of the document; and WHEREAS, the comments received and the City's responses to these comments are included in the public record for the AUAR Update; and WHEREAS, an objection to the AUAR update and Mitigation Plan was received from the Met Council, but was officially withdrawn via a letter after updates were made; and WHEREAS, the revised/final AUAR Update and Mitigation Plan Update dated December 23, 2025 is an informational document that will assist the City of Shakopee in guiding development of the subject area; and WHEREAS, development in the Jackson Township Development Area is expected to comply with all Shakopee and review agency standards as well as the mitigation measures outlined in the revised/final AUAR Update and Mitigation Plan Update dated December 23, 2025. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Shakopee hereby adopts the revised/final AUAR Update and Mitigation Plan Update for the Jackson Township Development Area. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the 6th day of January, 2026. 207 Matt Lehman Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Richard Parsons City Clerk Prepared by: City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 208 Jackson Township Development Area 2025 AUAR Update Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Update Prepared for: City of Shakopee SHAKOPEE Prepared by: SRF Consulting Group [SRF December 23, 2025 SRF Project No. 19234 209 Table of Contents 1. Introduction and Purpose: 6 2. Update to the Environmental Review: 6 3. Project Title: 6 4. Proposer: 6 5. Responsible Government Unit (RGU): 6 6. Reason for EAW Preparation: 6 7. Project Location. 6 8. Project Description• 7 Overview 7 9. Climate Adaptation and Resilience: 11 Temperature 11 Heat Island 12 Precipitation 12 Localized Flood Risk 12 Cooling Degree Days 12 10. Permits and Approvals Required: 14 11. Land Use: 16 Planned Land Use 17 12. Cover Types: 17 Zoning 17 13. Geology, Soils and Topography/Landforms• 18 14. Water Resources: 18 Surface Water 18 Ground Water 18 Wastewater 19 Stormwater 20 Water Appropriation 20 Surface Waters 25 15. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes. 25 Contaminated Properties 25 Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update ['RF 210 Solid Waste 25 16. Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (rare features)• 26 State Listed Threatened and Endangered Species 26 Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species 27 Minnesota Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance 29 Native Plant Communities 30 17. Historic Properties: 31 18. Visual• 32 19. Air: 32 Stationary Source Emissions 32 Vehicle Emissions 32 Dust and Odors 32 20. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions/Carbon Footprint 32 21. Noise: 32 Construction Noise 32 Traffic -Related Noise 32 22. Transportation: 33 23. Cumulative Potential Effects: 35 Highview Park Development Project 38 Windermere Development Project 43 Countryside 3rd Addition Project 45 River Valley Business Park 45 Breeggemann Development Project (Bluff View Addition) 46 Palomino Trail Development (Tamarack Road) 46 LaTour Development Project 47 Bauer Property Development 47 Louisville Township 47 24. Other Potential Environmental Effects: 48 Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update [RF 211 List of Tables Table 1: Project Magnitude Data — 2040 Comp Plan Scenario 8 Table 2: Project Magnitude Data — Max Build Scenario 8 Table 3: Project Magnitude Data — 2025 AUAR Update Scenario 9 Table 4: Project Magnitude - Gross and Developable Acres 9 Table 5: Climate Considerations and Adaptations 13 Table 6: Permits and Approvals 14 Table 7: County Well Index Within the Study Area 21 Table 8: Additional Water Demand from 2040 Comp Plan Development Scenario 24 Table 9: Additional Water Demand from Max Build Development Scenario 24 Table 10: Additional Water Demand from 2025 AUAR Update Development Scenario 24 Table 11: AUAR Land Use Scenarios 33 Table 12: Daily Trips Comparison 33 Table 13: Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Update 34 Table 17: Projects proposed within the AUAR study area, by any entity 35 Table 18: Projects proposed adjacent to the AUAR study area, by any entity 36 Table 14: Pre Highview Park Development (Existing) Intersection Capacity Analysis 39 Table 15: 2030 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis 40 Table 16: 2040 Comp Plan Update - Intersection Capacity Analysis 41 Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update [RF 212 Appendices Appendix A — Figures Appendix B — Mitigation Plan Update Appendix C — Wastewater Management Memo Appendix D — Stormwater Management Memo Appendix E — Contamination Review Memo Appendix F — IPaC and DNR Information Appendix G — SHPO, MIAC, and OSA information Appendix H — Transportation Memo Appendix I — GHG Emissions Memo Appendix J — Agency Comments and Responses Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update [RF 213 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE: This document provides for an update to the Jackson Township Development Area AUAR. The original AUAR was completed in 2020. This document serves as the first five-year update. An abbreviated version of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) questionnaire form (December 2022 version) has been used for this update to assist in the review of this AUAR Update. 2. UPDATE TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This document provides any updates to the original AUAR that were necessary. This document was published and distributed to the public and the EQB distribution list on September 30, 2025. A public meeting was held on October 9, 2025. Agency comments and responses can be found in Appendix J. No public comments were received. 3. PROJECT TITLE: Jackson Township Development Area 4. PROPOSER: City of Shakopee Contact Person: Mark Noble Title: Senior Planner, Planning and Development Address: 485 Gorman St. Shakopee MN 55379 Phone: 952-233-9348 Email: mnoble@shakopeemn.gov 5. RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT UNIT (RGU): City of Shakopee Contact Person: Mark Noble Title: Senior Planner, Planning and Development Address: 485 Gorman St. Shakopee MN 55379 Phone: 952-233-9348 Email: mnoble@shakopeemn.gov 6. REASON FOR EAW PREPARATION: Not applicable to AUAR. 7. PROJECT LOCATION: County: Scott City: Shakopee Sections 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 23 and 24, Township 23, Range 115 Watershed: Lower Minnesota River Watershed, Scott Watershed Management Organization Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 6 SRF 214 GPS Coordinates: 44°46'15.52"N, 93°33'23.38"W (Central Point) Tax Parcel Number: Multiple 8. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Overview The Jackson Township Development Area AUAR was originally prepared to provide a complete understanding of the cumulative impacts of planned development in seven growth areas that are either currently part of the City of Shakopee (herein referred to as "the City") or are planned to be in the future as part of the City's orderly annexation agreement with Jackson Township. As noted in the City of Shakopee 2040 Comprehensive Plan, (also known as Envision Shakopee) the City of Shakopee and Jackson Township updated their Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation, originally established in 2002. The agreement provides a plan and procedures for the incremental incorporation of land from the township into the City. Phased annexation is planned to occur generally from east to west and north to south. The most immediate areas anticipated for development were available for city -driven annexation in 2018, while other areas are not available for annexation until 2050. Figure 1, Appendix A shows the State Location, and Figure 2, Appendix A shows the Study Area. The AUAR Study area is divided into seven Subdistricts, A through G, that correspond with the areas defined in the orderly annexation agreement and an area of Shakopee poised for new growth. They are contiguous and are generally located to the southwest of current Shakopee city boundaries. The City will update the AUAR every five years until all development is completed; this is the first five-year update. Development Scenarios The original AUAR's environmental analysis included two development scenarios: a "no -build" scenario (Shakopee 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Scott County 2030 Comprehensive Plan) and a build scenario (Shakopee 2040 Comprehensive Plan). The Scott County and Shakopee 2030 Comprehensive Plans were in effect when the original AUAR was ordered, but they are no longer in effect today; therefore, the "no -build" scenario from the original AUAR (that was related to 2030 plans) is no longer valid and is being nullified with this update. This update includes three development scenarios: • 2040 Comp Plan: the first development scenario is based on the Shakopee's 2040 Comp Plan that was approved in November 2019, hereafter referred to as the 2040 Comp Plan Scenario. Table 1 lists the results for each subdistrict's number of residential dwelling units, retail square feet (SF) and non - retail SF. This scenario is consistent with the 2040 Comp Plan scenario included in the traffic analysis of the original AUAR and is considered the baseline or "no -build" scenario. • Max Build: the second development scenario represents the maximum development that is realistically expected to occur and is known as the Maximum Build or Max Build. This scenario is consistent with the Max Build scenario included in the traffic analysis of the original AUAR. This 1 City of Shakopee. City of Shakopee 2040 Comprehensive Plan. November 2019. Accessed 29 October 2025 and available at https://www.shakopeemn.gov/business development/planning development/2040 comprehensive plan.php. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 7 SRF 215 scenario considers several land use assumptions which are further outlined in Item/Section 11 (Land Use) and Figure 2 of Appendix H. The Max Build development scenario is tabulated in Table 2. • 2025 AUAR Update: this AUAR Update presents a third development scenario, in which development magnitudes have been adjusted to reflect approved/built development and updated projections provided by the City and to be consistent with the transportation planning projections. This development scenario is referred to as the 2025 AUAR Update Scenario, as shown in Table 3. This scenario did not appear in the original AUAR and represents new or updated information since that document's completion. Table 1: Project Magnitude Data — 2040 Comp Plan Scenario Subdistrict Residential Dwelling Units Retail (SF) Non -Retail (SF) A 304 - 462,000 B 361 - 75,000 C 30 - 2,000 D 238 46,000 55,000 E 15 10,000 4,000 F 6 - 1,000 G 200 134,000 41,000 Total 1,154 190,000 640,000 Table 2: Project Magnitude Data — Max Build Scenario Subdistrict Residential Dwelling Units Retail (SF) Non -Retail (SF) A 334 719,000 469,000 B 422 946,000 2,314,000 C 450 84,000 - D 339 251,000 1,094,000 E 113 15,000 - F - - - G 355 134,000 41,000 Total 2,013 2,149,000 3,918,000 Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 8 SRF 216 Table 3: Project Magnitude Data — 2025 AUAR Update Scenario Subdistrict Residential Dwelling Units Retail (SF) Non -Retail (SF) A 505 - 750,000 B 341 - 1,177,000 C 1,372 - - D 209 46,000 1,146,000 E 123 - 6,500 F - - - G 368 24,000 14,000 Total 2,918 70,000 3,093,500 Table 4 describes gross acreage for each of the subdistricts of this AUAR study area, as well as developable acreage. Please note that Table 4 is a replacement for Attachment B of the original AUAR which is no longer valid with this update. The study area is made up of 69% developable land and 31% of land that is considered undevelopable. For the purposes of this study, undevelopable is defined as: • Open space or parkland • Lakes, rivers, wetlands, or floodplains • Utilities (i.e., Xcel substation or Scott County Towers) • Roadway right of way • Parcels not eligible for annexation until 2050 These areas are considered undevelopable for planning purposes, whether due to physical/economic constraints, regulatory/legal limitations, or long-term policy restrictions. Table 4: Project Magnitude - Gross and Developable Acres Subdistrict Gross Total Acreage Gross % of Total Study Area Developable Acreage Developable % of Gross Acreage A 233 8% 202 7% B 377 13% 360 12% C 551 19% 526 18% D 1538 53% 839 29% E 90 3% 48 2% F 87 3% 0 0% G 28 1% 28 1% Total 2,903 100% 2,002 69% Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 9 IRF 217 AUAR Mitigation Plan The mitigation plan that was developed as part of the AUAR process has been revised with this update and is included in Appendix B. Water Infrastructure The majority of the study area is currently provided with potable water through individual wells. The Shakopee Public Utility Commission (SPUC) water system includes seven storage tanks, 18 groundwater supply wells and four pumping stations that service the entire community. The system utilizes four pressure zones: Normal Zone, First High Zone, East Zone, and the Second High Zone. The study area is within portions of the Normal, First High, and Second High pressure zones. Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure Portions of the study area are not connected to municipal sanitary sewer service. Most of the study area is outside the current Metropolitan Urban Services Areas (MUSA) boundary, though the boundary is anticipated to expand to cover the entire study area by 2040. Future extension of the sanitary infrastructure is needed to service the area. The study area is located within three sewer sheds based on the City's 2018 Sanitary Sewer Master Plan: West Louisville -Jackson (WLJ), West Jackson (WJ), and South Louisville Jackson (SLJ). The WLJ subdistrict is served by a trunk 24 -inch gravity sewer located within Emery Way west of CR69. The WJ subdistrict is served by an 18 -inch gravity sewer that is currently being extended within the Palomino Trail and Bluff View Developments, located along 17th Avenue, west of Marystown Road. The SLJ subdistrict is served by two sewer extensions, 1) an 18 -inch gravity sewer currently being extended in the Highview Park subdivision, located south of CH 78 and west of Marystown Road, and 2) a 24 -inch gravity sewer located south of 17th Avenue along Lusitano Street. Stormwater Improvements As development proposals are received, the City's existing stormwater policy will be used to review development proposals and mitigate impacts. There are various areas throughout the study area that experience drainage issues during storm and rain events. Electrical Infrastructure Improvements According to Shakopee's Long -Range Electric System Plan, three of the six Jackson Township areas forecasted to be annexed by the City are already serviced by SPUC for electrical service. There is a projected growth in electrical load provided by the City to the areas that are not yet serviced in the City's annexation plan of 23.2 mega -volt amperes. Transportation Infrastructure Improvements The study area is currently supported by a network of state, county, and local roadways. Since the original AUAR, several planned improvements to this network have been completed or are planned within and adjacent to the study area. One major improvement, the grade -separated interchange at US 169 and Hwy 41/County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 78, was completed in 2020, significantly enhancing regional mobility and safety. Additionally, the Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 10 SRF 218 extension of CSAH 16 to CSAH 69 is anticipated to be completed in the next five years, improving connectivity to Subdistricts A and B and supporting future development within the study area. In addition, Scott County has also implemented multiple infrastructure improvements at key intersections within the AUAR study area. Details on these improvements can be found in the transportation analysis provided in Appendix H. The traffic analysis completed for this AUAR update represents planning level estimates and should be further refined as development occurs and other regional roadway and intersection improvements are pursued. Future Considerations In 2007, area stakeholders analyzed the construction of a new Hwy 41 river crossing between the cities of Shakopee and Chaska. The new crossing was studied to explore opportunities that serve regional traffic, reduce traffic congestion, and protect the floodplain. Multiple corridors were studied through a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), which studied the project impacts on social, economic, and environmental resources in the area. As a result, The C-2 alignment was selected as the preferred alternative through the EIS process. The C-2 alignment is near the existing Hwy 41 alignment within this AUAR's study area. While the preferred alignment was selected, the new crossing is not planned or programmed within MnDOT's near term projects, and the new alignment was not considered in the traffic analysis for this AUAR. However, the City recognizes the alignment and the findings of the FEIS and will monitor the alignment and future right-of-way needs. It should be noted that the City of Chaska recently reconstructed its downtown segment from a 4 -lane divided roadway to a 2 -lane divided roadway with turn lanes. Similarly, the Hwy 41 intersection at the MN Rail Frontage Road was rebuilt as a 2 -lane roadway with turn lanes. 9. CLIMATE ADAPTATION AND RESILIENCE: Trends in temperature, precipitation, flood risk, and cooling degree days for the AUAR Development Area are described in the below sections and in Table 5. Temperature trends described below utilize the shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) climate projects. Cooling degree days projections described below utilize Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs). Both SSPs and RCPs are greenhouse gas concentration scenarios used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. SSP 245 and RCP 4.5 are intermediate emissions scenarios in which emissions decline after peaking around 2040. SSP 370 and RCP 8.5 are high emissions scenarios in which emissions continue to rise throughout the century.2 Temperature According to the Minnesota Climate Mapping and Analysis Tool (CliMAT),3 the annual daily average temperature in the AUAR Development Area from 1995 to 2014 is 46.0 °F. In 2040-2059, the annual daily 2 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Climate Explorer Metadata. August 2021. Accessed 23 August 2025 and available at https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/climate-explorer-metadata.html. 3 University of Minnesota. Minnesota Climate Mapping and Analysis Tools. Accessed 23 August 2025 and available at https://app.climate.umn.edu/?output type=modelVal&scenario=ssp370 2080-2099&model=ensemble&variable=tmax- degF&time frame=yearly&aoi=none#intro pane. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 11 IRF 219 average temperature in the AUAR Development Area is projected to increase to 49.8 °F and 51.0 °F under an intermediate emissions scenario (SSP 245) and high emissions scenario (SSP 370), respectively. In 2080-2099, annual daily average temperature is projected to further increase to 52.8 °F and 55.1 °F under SSP 245 and SSP 370, respectively. Heat Island Impervious surfaces and structures such as roads, parking lots, and buildings absorb and re -emit more solar energy than natural landscapes. This effect can significantly increase air temperature and overall extreme heat vulnerability in urban areas where dense concentrations of impervious surfaces exist. This is referred to as the urban heat island effect. According to the Metropolitan Council Extreme Heat Map Tool,4 the AUAR Development Area is susceptible to extreme heat based on the land surface temperature during a heatwave in 2022. Precipitation According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Climate Resilience Evaluation and Awareness Tool (CREAT) Climate Change Scenarios Projection Map,' there is a projected 3.0% to 13.9% increase in 100 -year storm intensity by 2035 and a projected 5.8% to 27.0% increase in 100 -year storm intensity by 2060 for the AUAR Development Area. Localized Flood Risk The Metropolitan Council Localized Flood Map Screening Tool identifies localized flood hazards,' referred to as Bluespots, which are broken into Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, and Shallow categories based on potential flood water depth. Primary Bluespots are higher risk flood areas, and Shallow Bluespots are typically isolated low areas with lower flood risk. The tool shows several Bluespots within the AUAR Development Area, with maximum depths ranging from 0.26 feet to 22.70 feet. Cooling Degree Days Cooling Degree Days is a term used by the National Weather Service to estimate cooling needs for buildings and can be examined as a baseline and projected exposure indicator under the RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios. Cooling degree days are indexed units that approximately describe the demand to heat or cool a building. Cooling degree days accumulate based on degrees over 65 °F when cooling is required. For example, cooling degree days for a weather station that records an average daily temperature of 75 °F would be 10. According to Heat Vulnerability in Minnesota,' the number of cooling degree days in 2019 for Scott County was 446. Under the RCP 4.5 scenario, the number of cooling degree days in 2050 for Scott County is 4 Metropolitan Council. Extreme Heat Map TooL 2022. Accessed 23 August 2025 and available at https://metrocouncil.org/Communities/Planning/Local-Planning-Assistance/CVA/Extreme-Heat.aspx. 5 Environmental Protection Agency. Climate Resilience Evaluation and Awareness Tool Climate Change Scenarios Project Map. September 2022. Accessed 23 August 2025 and available at https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=3805293158d54846a29f750d63c6890e. 6 Metropolitan Council. Localized Flood Map Screening TooL August 2024. Accessed 23 August 2025 and available at https://metrocouncil.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=100fa3012dcc4e288a74cbf4d95027bf. University of Minnesota. Heat Vulnerability in Minnesota. 2019 accessed 23 August 2025 and available at https://maps.umn.edu/climatehealthtool/heat app/. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 12 SRF 220 projected to be 520. Under the RCP 8.5 scenario, the number of cooling degree days in 2050 for Scott County is projected to be 673. Table 5: Climate Considerations and Adaptations Resource Category Climate Considerations Project Information Climate Change Risks and Vulnerabilities Adaptations Project Design Aspects of building architecture/materials choices and site design may impact urban heat island conditions in the surrounding area, including changing climate zones, temperature trends, and potential for extended heat waves. Projected climate trends include an increase in temperature and heat island effect, precipitation and localized flood risk, and cooling degree days. Since the City of Shakopee joined the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's GreenStep program in 2019, the City has adopted several sustainable project design elements including energy efficient public buildings, efficient outdoor lighting and signals, resilient city growth, inclusion on mixed use spaces, a stormwater management assessment, efficient water and wastewater systems, and a focus on green business development and renewable energy. Land Use No critical facilities (i.e., facilities necessary for public health and safety, those storing hazardous materials, or those with housing occupants who may be insufficiently mobile) are proposed. Portions of the AUAR Development Area may experience flooding during extreme rain events. Utilize the GreenStep initiative of designing stormwater management areas to reduce the risk of flooding, including infiltration basins and filtration systems. Water Resources Current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the AUAR Development Area may influence water resources. Water resources in the AUAR Development Area may become warmer, more polluted, and change in volume due to increased temperatures and runoff. Localized flood risk will be higher with increased precipitation and storm events, which will require adequate Utilize the GreenStep initiative of designing efficient stormwater management areas. Also utilize the GreenStep initiative of community forest and soils, including planting native vegetation to facilitate water absorption. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 13 SRF 221 Resource Category Climate Considerations Project Information Climate Change Risks and Vulnerabilities Adaptations maintenance of drainage systems to accommodate the increase in water volume. Contamination/ Hazardous Materials/Wastes Current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the AUAR Development Area may influence the potential environmental effects of generation/use/storage of hazardous waste and materials. The proposed AUAR development is not anticipated to generate hazardous waste. Not applicable. pp Fish wildlife plant " " communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features) Current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate p change in the AUAR Development Area may influence the local species and suitable habitat. Climate trends may change habitat suitability for species in the AUAR Development Area. Native plantings and stormwater management areas would provide suitable habitat for species that currently utilize the existing area. * Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Minnesota GreenStep Cities: City of Shakopee. Accessed 24 August 2025 and available at https://greenstep.pca.state.mn.us/city-detail/12444. 10. PERMITS AND APPROVALS REQUIRED: Table 6 lists the anticipated major approvals and permits likely to be required by future development projects. These have not changed since the original AUAR. Table 6: Permits and Approvals Unit of Government Type of Permit or Approval Federal U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Section 404 of the Clean Water Act State Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) State Endangered Species Review MnDNR Public Waters Work Permit (if impacting a public water or public water wetland) MnDNR Temporary Water Appropriation Permit Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 14 IRF 222 Unit of Government Type of Permit or Approval MnDNR Amendment to Shoreland Ordinance to include the two Natural Environment Lakes within the Study Area MnDNR Amendment to DNR Water Appropriation Permit 1980-6205 for increased water use Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Section 401 Certification MPCA Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit MPCA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) Permit/Approval Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Water Main Plan Approval Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Drainage permit (required before any development occurs that would alter stormwater conveyance in MnDOT right of way) MnDOT Any work that affects MnDOT right of way will require an appropriate permit. All permits are available and must be applied at: https://olpa.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/ Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Cultural Resource Coordination Minnesota Office of the State Archeologist (OSA) Cultural Resource Coordination Minnesota Council of Indian Affairs (MIAC) Cultural Resource Coordination Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings Municipal Boundary Adjustment Regional Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Sanitary Sewer Plan/Connection Approval Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Watershed District Permit Scott Watershed Management Organization Watershed Management Organization Approval County* Scott County Access permits to County Roadways Scott County Grading Permit* Scott County Subdivision Approval* Scott County Rezoning* Scott County Building Permits* Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 15 SRF 223 Unit of Government Type of Permit or Approval Local City of Shakopee Grading Permit City of Shakopee Subdivision Approval City of Shakopee Rezoning City of Shakopee Building Permits City of Shakopee Site Plan Approval *Permitting with Scott County for grading, subdivisions, rezoning and building permits will be required if development is pursued prior to annexation into the City of Shakopee. 11. LAND USE: The AUAR study area is approximately 2,889 acres in size located to the west and south of the existing City of Shakopee limits (see Figure 1 and Figure 2, Appendix A). The AUAR study area currently includes a range of existing uses, from undeveloped open space and recreational areas to commercial development. Several new developments have been approved and/or constructed since the original AUAR, as shown in Figure 2, Appendix H, which also depicts updated land use assumptions. Below is a summary of the land use assumptions that were developed by the City of Shakopee: • In Subdistrict A, the bluff area is being preserved long-term as open space. • In Subdistrict B, about a quarter of the land is fully developed as single family (and not expected to sell), a mobile home park, and industrial. • In Subdistrict C, two parcels are considered undevelopable because they are either being used for water utilities or are not eligible for annexation until 2050. • In Subdistrict D, a large portion of the land is open space/park and is within the Minnesota River Valley State Park, as well as within wetland complexes, floodplains, and Nyssens Lake. This subdistrict also has an established Xcel substation, fully developed commercial area, and a mobile home park. • The south half of Subdistrict E is not eligible for annexation until 2050 and is therefore considered undevelopable as part of this AUAR update. • All of Subdistrict F recently opened as Jackson Commons Park and is therefore considered undevelopable as part of this AUAR update. • In Subdistrict G, a small portion that constitutes roughly a third of this subdistrict is fully developed as residential. As mentioned, all of Subdistrict F was recently opened as a new neighborhood park and recreational area with trails, which is considered a change from the original AUAR. New trails are being constructed just Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 16 IRF 224 outside and northeast of the study area on Marystown Rd, to provide safer mobility for pedestrians and cyclists to cross US 169, which is likely to benefit residents just south of that interchange (in Subdistrict G).8 There have been no changes to the Future Considerations and Prime or Unique Farmland within the study area. Planned Land Use All built or approved developments are consistent with the City's 2040 Planned Land Use map. Portions of the study area have been annexed into the City of Shakopee since the original 2020 AUAR, while other portions remain within Jackson Township/Scott County jurisdiction. The area currently outside of the City's jurisdiction is not serviced by municipal water or wastewater services. The transportation network within the study area is well established with arterial roadways to service this area. There have been no changes to the City's planned and proposed land uses since 2020. The City's planned land use map will be updated alongside the 2050 Comprehensive Plan, due to be completed in 2028. 12. COVER TYPES: The original AUAR indicated that the study area included a variety of cover types throughout the Subdistricts, ranging from grassland and crop land to lakes and wetlands. The specific building siting, parking layouts and internal street network were not yet determined within the study area. Therefore, the figure identified the general overlay of development areas compared to conservation areas. Since the original, portions of the study area have been developed, and the cover types have changed. Approved development is shown in Figure 2 of Appendix H. Additionally, see Figure 5 in Appendix A for an updated cover types map which includes 2024 data from the National Land Cover Database, latest available parcel information, the latest available aerial, and a recently identified conservation/protection area. As of October 2025, the city is in the process of purchasing the entire bluff just south of US 169 and east of Old Brick Yard Rd (CR 69) to protect the natural resources in that area. The city anticipates closing on that land in January 2026, which is about 32 acres. Zoning The annexed portions of the study area have been assigned to zoning categories, as shown in Appendix A Figure 6. Most of the study area is zoned in a manner consistent with 2040 planned land use and development plans, although portions of Subdistricts A and B that are slated for development are zoned as Agricultural Preserve. This will require coordination to amend zoning in accordance with planned developments and ensure that future development patterns preserve the natural environment. Zoning information was acquired from Scott County,9 and the City of Shakopee,10 both data sources were used in order to cover the entirety of the study area as shown in Figure 4, Appendix A. There have been no zoning changes for the portions of the study area in Scott County jurisdiction. 8 City of Shakopee. Marystown Road Corridor Improvements. Accessed in November 2025 and available at marystownroad.com I. 9 Scott County Minnesota. Scott County Zoning. Accessed 3 September 2025 and available at https://open-data- scottcounty.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/ScottCounty::zoning/explore. 1° City of Shakopee. Zoning. Accessed 3 September 2025 and available at https://www.shakopeemn.gov/business development/planning development/zoning map.php Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 17 SRF 225 13. GEOLOGY, SOILS AND TOPOGRAPHY/LANDFORMS: The existing bedrock, geologic hazards, soil conditions, and potentially contaminated properties were studied using various state resources. No changes were made to this section from the original AUAR. 14. WATER RESOURCES: Surface Water There is no change in this subsection from the original AUAR. As noted in the original AUAR, the Minnesota River defines portions of the western and northern limits of the study area. While located within the study area, there are no specific development plans that propose a use of the Minnesota River. This includes the development of recreational or commercial use of the river for transportation or activity use. There are two nearby water related uses along the Minnesota River. These include a public boat launch within the City of Shakopee and passive water -based recreation opportunities within the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge. Ground Water Water Supply and Water Quality As noted in the original AUAR, three aquifers provide the water source for the Shakopee public water supply — Prairie du Chien -Jordan Sandstone aquifer (Jordan Aquifer), Tunnel City-Wonewoc Bedrock aquifer, and Mt. Simon/Hinckley bedrock aquifer. The Jordan Aquifer supplies the greatest quantity of water to the system and is expected to continue to provide the greatest supply in the future. As indicated in the City's Comprehensive Water System Plan Update,11 currently, the SPUC has nineteen total municipal wells with fourteen of the wells completed in and open to only the Jordan Aquifer. According to its own projections, the SPUC forecasts the need to construct four or five additional municipal wells to meet its future, ultimate development, water demand. The future wells are intended to utilize the Jordan Aquifer. The SPUC continues to monitor water quality, health, and aesthetic concerns. The water system is first expected to grow in the Western portion of the city as portions of Jackson Township are annexed into Shakopee City limits with the potential for additional growth in Louisville township. For the 2040 Comprehensive Water Plan Update, current and future municipal demands were developed. These demands were based on the assumption that a portion of Jackson Township would be annexed into the city. It was noted that SPUC as a result will provide water to portions of Jackson Township to be annexed. Stormwater management and spill response considers the nearby public water supply wells and domestic supply wells. Public water supply wells are within the AUAR study area. The Shakopee Public Utilities Wellhead Protection Spill Response Plan12 includes a step-by-step summary of key decisions and action items that must be considered when protecting the public water supply wells during a spill event. Certain decisions, especially early in a spill event, will likely be handled by emergency management teams in the interest of protecting public health and safety. However, it is expected that a Shakopee Public Utilities representative will document those decisions as part of the spill response plan, so that later decision making 11 City of Shakopee. 2024 Comprehensive Water System Plan Update. September 2024. Plan prepared by Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SHE). Copy provided by Shakopee Public Utilities on 27 October 2025. 12 Shakopee Public Utilities. Wellhead Protection Spill Response Plan. June 2012. Prepared by Stantec, Inc. Copy provided by Shakopee Public Utilities on 27 October 2024. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 18 IRF 226 and action items can fully reflect what is known about the spill. Action items include items such as isolating the public from immediate hazards, reporting the spill to a state duty officer, reporting the spill proximity to a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) to affected wellhead protection plan managers and appropriate agency staff, identifying possible points of containment, shutting down wells closest to the spill until further investigation can be completed, activating alternative water source option(s) and shutting down wells closest to the spill when possible, beginning to enact emergency water conservation measures, establishing an aquifer monitoring plan and well sampling strategy, studying options for water treatment, water blending, or well replacement, and enacting any necessary modifications to the water supply system to restore capacity. Because part of the AUAR study area is in a high vulnerability DWSMA, there are limits on where infiltration can take place. Stormwater ponds or infiltration areas must be located appropriately to limit potential impacts to drinking water supplies. This may include coordination with the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD) and other entities. Their 2018-2027 Watershed Plan13 specifically notes that infiltration practices are not allowed in areas within a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) as defined in Minnesota Rule 4720.5100, Subp. 13., unless allowed by an LGU with a current MS4 permit Wastewater The majority of the study area is currently not serviced by the municipal sanitary system; however, as part of the original AUAR, the City reviewed the estimated sewer needs for the AUAR study area as part of its Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. The current Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) limits align with the City's existing boundary; these are areas within the study area that are in the MUSA. Development within the study area is dependent on the expansion of municipal sewer to service Jackson Township. As the MUSA is expanded and development is pursued, the analysis of this section should be updated. Appendix C includes a Wastewater Management Memo. Information informing this analysis included the City's Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan, 14 the West End - Lower Bluff Lift Station and Trunk Sanitary Sewer Feasibility Report,15 and the 2016 West End Sanitary Sewer System Study. (I will send a map of completed improvements to be included in the document.). There are no substantial changes to the assumptions included in the Original AUAR and the City's 2019 Master Plan as part of this AUAR update. Development has occurred within the Study Area and portions of the planned sanitary sewer network have been constructed. One significant piece of this infrastructure is the completion of the West End Lower Bluff Lift Station, which serves the WLJ sanitary sewer subdistrict within the AUAR study area. Appendix C includes a map of the planned and since constructed sanitary sewer network. Interceptor Agreement Statement When Interceptor (9206) was constructed in 1995, an agreement was entered into between the Metropolitan Council and the City covering additional trunk sewer capacity costs for the City. In accordance with the 13 Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD). 2018-2027 Watershed Management Plan. October 2022. Accessed 28 October 2025 and available at https://lowermnriverwd.org/application/files/3516/6629/5277/LMRWD Complete Plan 2018- 2027 Amended 2022 reduced for web.pdf. 14 City of Shakopee. West End Sanitary Sewer Study. November 2016. Prepared by Bolton & Menk, Inc. Copy provided by City of Shakopee on 10 September 2025. 15 City of Shakopee. West End - Lower Bluff Lift Station and Trunk Sanitary Sewer Feasibility Report. Prepared by Advanced Engineering and Engineering Services. Copy provided by City of Shakopee on 10 September 2025. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 19 SRF 227 agreement, the City must purchase additional capacity in the interceptor, after flows within the interceptor, at Townline Avenue, reach 3 cubic feet per second peak flow, or 571,000 gallons per day (gpd) averaged. Stormwater An analysis of changes in stormwater management, including identification of new stormwater management practices (BMPs) installed since the original AUAR has been completed. See Appendix D for the Stormwater Management Memo. Water Appropriation This section has been updated to include the latest Minnesota Geological Survey's County Well Index (July 2022) and most recent wellhead plan protection information in accordance with City's Wellhead Protection Plan Part 1.16 Shakopee, Brookhaven Development, and Mobile Manor Mobile Home Park all have wells with significant nitrate contamination. The City's Wellhead Protection Plan indicates that all of Shakopee's wells, with the exception of Wells 10, 12, and 14, are considered vulnerable to contamination. High geologic sensitivity and high nitrates concentrations within the Jordan Aquifer below the bluff line were noted as the primary reasons for the vulnerable classifications. The plan indicates that only major surface water features in the area, such as the Minnesota River, are in direct hydraulic connection with the Jordan Aquifer. However, the shallow nature of the overlying Prairie du Chien formation and the partial connection between the Prairie du Chien and Jordan Aquifers led to the development of a delineation of surface water runoff areas that may contribute to infiltration of highly vulnerable portions of the bedrock aquifers and negatively impact water quality. The Wellhead Protection Plan notes that the Jordan Aquifer appears to have sufficient transmissivity and recharge to remain a long-term source of drinking water for the residents of Shakopee. All future water supply wells will most likely be completed within the Jordan Aquifer. The plan further notes that monitoring water levels within the Jordan Aquifer in the region will help establish its long-term sustainability as Scott County continues to develop. It was noted that water level data collected in the Shakopee Public Utilities wells will contribute to the understanding of groundwater sustainability. Addressing elevated nitrate pollution and other vulnerabilities will require coordination among entities (City of Shakopee, Scott County, LMRWD, adjacent communities) and review and implementation of opportunities noted in Part 2 of the City's Wellhead Protection Plan.17 Opportunities were listed as the following: 1. The majority of the commercially zoned areas within the DWSMA are within Shakopee city limits and therefore are subject to official zoning controls administered directly by the City of Shakopee. An opportunity exists for the Shakopee Public Utilities to continue working with the City of Shakopee to manage the DWSMA. 2. Watershed management districts exist to manage surface water drainage for areas of the DWSMA. An opportunity exists to partner with watersheds in managing wellhead protection areas. 16 City of Shakopee. Shakopee Public Utilities Wellhead Protection Plan Part 1 (Amendment). August 2009. Bonestroo Project No. 1390-08001. Copy provided by Shakopee Public Utilities on 27 October 2025. 17 City of Shakopee. Shakopee Public Utilities Wellhead Protection Plan Part 2 (Amendment). February 2012. Stantec Project No. 193800757. Copy provided by Shakopee Public Utilities on 27 October 2025. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 20 SRF 228 3. An opportunity exists to work with other communities intersected by the DWSMA in planning land uses in order to protect the area's groundwater resources. 4. Shakopee Public Utilities obtained grant money from the Minnesota Department of Health to help implement wellhead protection planning efforts. Future grant funding opportunities are likely to be made available in the coming years. In addition, measures to address contamination issues are outlined in the City's Comprehensive Water System Plan Update. If one of SPUC's wells is discovered to have a water quality parameter (iron, manganese, nitrate, arsenic, radium, etc.) that has surpassed a drinking water standard, SPUC takes the necessary steps to ensure the well is either rarely used for supply and/or blended with a cleaner well. Any blending that is done and reported within the SPUC water system is done at the well house prior to entering the distribution system. The City's Comprehensive Water System Plan Update further notes that the monitoring results have shown nitrate levels, in all of SPUC's wells, have mostly stayed the same or gotten lower over the past 20 years. It is expected that this downward trend will continue as agriculture land is developed into residential and commercial properties throughout the watershed, reducing leaching into the aquifer. The Plan further notes that future Wastewater Treatment Plants (WTP) can be designed as a nitrate removal facilities in areas where reduced nitrate is a goal. Figure 3, Appendix A and Table 7 below show 27 current wells within the study area consisting of 26 domestic wells and one industrial well., An additional 31 wells are located outside the study area within a 500 -foot buffer consisting of 27 domestic wells, two test wells, one monitor well, and one industrial well. All of the wells within the study area from the public CWI are shown in Table 7. Those within the buffered zone are marked with an asterisk (*). The Shakopee Wellhead Protection Area runs along the eastern portion of the study area. Figure 3 shows the DWSMA. Bonnevista Terrace Mobile Home Park, Jackson Heights Mobile Home Park, Mobile Manor Mobile Home Park, and Brookhaven Development have all defined DWSMAs since 2020. A significant portion of the DWSMAs within the study area are highly vulnerable to surface contamination (have a DWSMA Vulnerability rating of High). It should be noted that the tabulation of wells is incomplete. Homes that are not connected to a public water supply can be assumed to have a well and these wells are not included in the County Well Index. There are also other public water supply wells within the project area, but the publicly available online datasets through the County Well Index exclude public water supply wells (considered restricted information), typically for security and privacy reasons. The SPUC maintains a list of current and planned municipal wells. The Wellhead Protection Plan indicates that water in the SPUC water distribution system is regularly sampled and analyzed for contaminants regulated under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. Routine monitoring by the Public Water Supply Program at MDH does not indicate contamination that may pose a public health risk. The goal of the Wellhead Protection Plan is to prevent human -caused contaminants from entering the public water supply wells and to protect all who use the SPUC's water supply from adverse health effects associated with groundwater contamination. However, nitrate contamination within the Jordan Aquifer is indicative of human -sourced contamination and outlines the vulnerability of these wells to possible future contamination from spills or leaks. Table 7: County Well Index Within the Study Area Well ID Well Type Well Depth (ft) Status 705136 Domestic 280 Active Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 21 SRF 229 Well ID Well Type Well Depth (ft) Status 634980 Domestic 180 Active 561402 Domestic 261 Active 632976 Domestic 280 Active 676856 Domestic 265 Active 581848 Domestic 180 Active 404373 Domestic 200 Active 253026 Domestic 266 Inactive 587569 Domestic 341 Active 605935 Domestic 227 Active 206807 Domestic 166 Active 451132 Domestic 280 Active 436482 Domestic 320 Active 206806 Domestic 400 Active 772251 Industrial 200 Active 432854 Domestic 262 Active 441519 Domestic 280 Active 515779 Domestic 240 Active 407610 Domestic 240 Active 206813 Domestic 200 Active 570166 Domestic 220 Active 532175 Domestic 260 Active 109882 Domestic 240 Active 119567 Domestic 305 Active 407611 Domestic 300 Active 560332 Industrial 180 Active 646361 Domestic 340 Active 653060 Domestic 180 Active 417580 Domestic 300 Active 641541 Domestic 300 Active 436428 Domestic 320 Active 510438 Domestic 215 Active 666281 Domestic 220 Active 420696* Domestic 308 Active 420049* Domestic 300 Active 507541* Monitor Well 133 Active 840766* Test Well 422 Active 441523* Domestic 220 Active 420018* Domestic 300 Active 163482* Domestic 360 Active 221363* Domestic 280 Active 620615* Domestic 320 Sealed 570136* Domestic 340 Active 570155* Domestic 280 Active 523928* Domestic 260 Active 474608* Domestic 400 Active Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 22 IRF 230 Well ID Well Type Well Depth (ft) Status 404371* Domestic 280 Active 596211* Domestic 260 Active 570130* Domestic 340 Active 678853* Domestic 289 Active 545094* Domestic 240 Active 211858* Domestic 340 Active 443665* Domestic 300 Active 608296* Domestic 160 Active 589958* Domestic 300 Active 207438* Domestic 255 Active 433603* Domestic 320 Active 570128* Domestic 280 Active 577886* Domestic 280 Active 652972* Domestic 360 Active 585376* Domestic 340 Active 683041* Domestic 285 Active 518198* Domestic 260 Sealed 761609* Domestic 360 Active 502757* Domestic 300 Active 571456* Domestic 320 Active 605931* Domestic 310 Active 767891* Test Well 316 Active Water appropriation needs are anticipated to continue to grow as a result of development in the study area. Updated water demand information for the outlined scenarios (study area future water supply needs) is provided in Table 8, Table 9, and Table 10. Note that the tables represent additional maximum day (MD) demand (2.6 multiplier); this multiplier is in line with the future projections from SPUC, for which projected MD demand is 260% of average day demand, which is expressed in million gallons per day (mgd).1$ These projections account for the development magnitudes proposed as part of the AUAR update development scenarios and do not include existing water demand in the study area; however, SPUC and SPUC's water supply consultant, SEH, Inc., provided the estimates and confirmed that they are consistent with the 2024 Comprehensive Water Supply Plan Update (which states that if 2045 were a drought year, SPUC could experience a MD demand of 24.0 mgd. 18 SEH. 2024 Comprehensive Water System Plan Update. Accessed in November 2025 from electronic copy received from SPUC. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 23 IRF 231 Table 8: Additional Water Demand from 2040 Comp Plan Development Scenario Subdistrict Residential MD Demand (mgd) Retail MD Demand (mgd) Non -Retail MD Demand (mgd) Total Maximum Day Demand (mgd) A 0.212 - 0.032 0.244 B 0.252 - 0.005 0.257 C 0.021 - - 0.021 D 0.166 0.006 0.004 0.176 E 0.010 0.001 - 0.012 F 0.004 - - 0.004 G 0.140 0.018 0.003 0.161 Totals 0.807 0.026 0.044 0.876 Table 9: Additional Water Demand from Max Build Development Scenario Subdistrict Residential MD Demand (mgd) Retail MD Demand (mgd) Non -Retail MD Demand (mgd) Total Maximum Day Demand (mgd) A 0.233 0.097 0.032 0.363 B 0.295 0.128 0.160 0.583 C 0.314 0.011 - 0.326 D 0.237 0.034 0.076 0.346 E 0.079 0.002 - 0.081 F - - - - G 0.248 0.018 0.003 0.269 Totals 1.407 0.290 0.271 1.968 Table 10: Additional Water Demand from 2025 AUAR Update Development Scenario Subdistrict Residential MD Demand (mgd) Retail MD Demand (mgd) Non -Retail MD Demand (mgd) Total Maximum Day Demand (mgd) A 0.353 - 0.052 0.405 B 0.238 - 0.081 0.320 C 0.959 - - 0.959 D 0.146 0.006 0.079 0.232 E 0.086 - - 0.086 F - - - - G 0.257 0.003 0.001 0.261 Totals 2.039 0.009 0.214 2.263 The demand for each scenario was reviewed to be in line with the water demand projections described in Shakopee's current Comprehensive Water System Plan Update. Since Shakopee's local water supply plan is developed by the SPUC, coordination occurred directly with SPUC to ensure that any planned development Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 24 SRF 232 will not be limited by the need for additional water appropriations. Coordination will also continue to occur with SPUC and the DNR for any additional water appropriations that are needed to serve additional residents in the AUAR study area. The hypothetical water needs for the AUAR subdistricts were outlined in the original AUAR. All the data for future water supply needs is from 2019, when demand estimates were completed for the annexation of Jackson Township for the AUAR. The only historical data point from 2012 is the residential per capita Average Daily (AD) water use, which was a worst -case scenario based on a historically dry period, and is considered reasonable and prudent for use in this update. It was a hot, dry year, and the City of Shakopee used the most water on record for the utility. The city has grown since 2012, and while the city has not seen another use that high since, it could be assumed that a greater amount of water would be necessary based on the increased population, so it is still a valuable measuring tool. When completing water planning, the city provides for the worst -case scenario, which includes a max day demand as seen in 2012, plus some wells/facilities out of service (e.g., for regular maintenance, breakdown, or disaster). Study Area Improvements No changes were made to this section from the original AUAR. Surface Waters No changes were made to this section from the original AUAR. 15. CONTAMINATION/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTES: Contaminated Properties Potential environmental hazards and agricultural chemical contamination sites were reviewed using the latest Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and Minnesota Department of Agriculture's (MDA) What's in My Neighborhood? interactive mapping tool. No significant changes to existing conditions in relation to existing contamination or hazards have occurred based on an updated review, available in Appendix E. Solid Waste No changes were made to this section from the original AUAR. The City of Shakopee's City Code 51.03 requires that within the refuse/recycling service area,19 the City's contracted garbage hauler shall collect and dispose of refuse, yard waste, and recyclable materials from single-family dwellings, duplexes, and triplexes and all other residential dwelling units that receive individual curbside pickup of refuse. 19 Refuse/recycling area is defined as the area within the City's MUSA. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 25 SRF 233 16. FISH, WILDLIFE, PLANT COMMUNITIES, AND SENSITIVE ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES (RARE FEATURES): State Listed Threatened and Endangered Species According to the DNR's review of the Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) database, rare features are located within the vicinity of the study area. Appendix F includes correspondence from the DNR (Project Number: 2025-00646; submitted July 23, 2025, review results were received on September 18, 2025). Minnesota's Endangered Species Statute (Minnesota Statutes, section 84.0895) and associated Rules (Minnesota Rules, part 6212.1800 to 6212.2300 and 6134) prohibit the take of endangered or threatened plants or animals, including their parts or seeds, without a permit. Rare species within a one -mile radius of the study area include: • Butternut (Juglans cinerea), state -listed endangered tree o To demonstrate avoidance, a qualified surveyor would need to identify any trees that are proposed to be removed. • Kitten -tails (Synthyris bullii), state -listed threatened plant o To demonstrate avoidance, a qualified surveyor would need to determine if suitable habitat exists within the activity impact area and, if so, conduct a survey prior to any project activities. • Hooded arrowhead (Sagittaria montevidensis bar. calycina), state -listed threatened plant o To demonstrate avoidance, a qualified surveyor would need to determine if suitable habitat exists within the activity impact area and, if so, conduct a survey prior to any project activities. • Lark sparrow (Chondestes grammacus), state -listed species of special concern o If feasible, the DNR recommends avoiding disturbance to undisturbed grassland areas and tree and shrub removal from May 15 through August 15 to avoid disturbance of nesting birds • Black buffalo (Ictiobus niger), state -listed threatened fish species o If the project area contains suitable spawning habitat, work within the water needs to be avoided from April 1 through mid -June. If this is not feasible, Review.NHIS@state.mn.us would need to be contacted, as further action may be needed. • Mudpuppy (Necturus maculosus), state listed salamander species of special concern o The DNR recommends avoiding work within water from May through July to protect nesting mudpuppies. • Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus), both state -listed species of special concern o To minimize impacts, the DNR recommends that tree removal be avoided from June 1 through August 15. • Gophersnake (Pituophis catenifer), state -listed species of special concern o Given the presence of these rare snakes, the DNR recommends that the use of erosion control mesh, if any, be limited to wildlife -friendly materials. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 26 SRF 234 • Sessile -flowered Yellow Cress (Rorippa sessiliflora), plant species of special concern o The DNR recommends that if feasible, avoid suitable habitat. DNR indicated that surveys must be conducted by a qualified surveyor and follow the standards contained in the Rare Species Survey Process20 and Rare Plant Guidance.21 The Natural Heritage Review page22 can be visited for a list of certified surveyors and more information on this process. Survey proposals should be submitted to Reports.NHIS@state.mn.us prior to initiating survey work. Project planning should take into account that any botanical survey needs to be conducted during the appropriate time of the year, which may be limited. For any questions regarding this process, Review.NHlS@state.mn.us can be contacted. The DNR further asked that incidental sightings of state -listed species be reported via the DNR Plant and Animal Observation Form.23 The DNR encourages Natural Heritage Reviews as individual projects are planned to 1) to determine if there is any potential for a project to impact state -listed species or other rare features, and 2) to identify measures needed to ensure that a project is complying with state laws related to state -listed species and other rare features. Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species The DNR indicated that to ensure compliance with federal law, project proposers should conduct a federal regulatory review using the Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). The DNR noted that all projects, regardless of whether there is a federal nexus, are subject to federal take prohibitions. The IPaC review will determine if prohibited take is likely to occur and, if not, will generate an automated letter. The DNR review noted that the northern long-eared bat is federally listed as endangered. The AUAR study area also overlaps with a USFWS Rusty Patched Bumble Bee High Potential Zone. The IPaC tool was used to identify federally listed threatened and endangered species that may be within or near the study area and the results are detailed in Appendix F. Federally listed species identified from the IPaC search include: • Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), endangered — May Affect • Tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavaus), proposed endangered — May Affect • Rusty batched bumble bee (Bombus affinis), endangered — May Affect • Monarch butterfly (Danaus Plexippus), proposed threatened — No Effect • Whooping brane (Grus americana), experimental population, non -essential — No Effect 20 Minnesota DNR. Natural Heritage Review. A Rare Species Survey is Requested. Now What? October 2022. Accessed 19 September 2025 and available at https://files.dnr.state.mn.us/eco/nhnrp/rare-species-survey-process.pdf. 21 Minnesota DNR. Guidance on Collecting and Documenting Rare Plants. April 2022. Accessed 19 September 2025 and available at https://files.dnr.state.mn.us/eco/nhnrp/rare-plant-guidance.pdf. 22 Minnesota DNR. Natural Heritage Review Program. 2025. Accessed 19 September 2025 and available at https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/nhnrp/natural-heritage-review.html. 23 Minnesota DNR. MNDNR Plant and Animal Observations. 2025. Accessed 19 September 2025 and available at https://survey123.arcgis.com/share/5b0a415373c9464bb96751 f3f7cda180?portalUrl=https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/portal. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 27 IRF 235 Northern Long -Eared Bat and Tricolored Bat Since the original AUAR, the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) was reclassified from federally threatened to endangered in spring 2023. The USFWS proposed listing the tricolored bat (TCB) as endangered in 2022. On March 31, 2023, USFWS issued interim NLEB guidance and tools to help stakeholders transition to the endangered classification. In October 2024, USFWS released the final guidance and tools for the NLEB including an updated NLEB and TCB Rangewide Determination Key to assist individuals and organizations seeking to evaluate impacts to these species prior to carrying out activities. These tools also support the conservation of the TCB, should the species be listed, with the goal of providing compliance predictability and conserve remaining bats within the NLEB and TCB ranges while minimizing impacts to the regulated public. USFWS has updated its regulatory mapping for both the NLEB and TCB. The AUAR study area falls within the range of the NLEB,24 as well as the TCB.25 Each year the GIS data incorporated into the Rangewide Determination Key will be reviewed so that it remains accurate based on the best available information. Federal law under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) as well as additional rules, agency policies, and consultation requirements, should be reviewed as part of project planning. Rusty Patched Bumble Bee The rusty patched bumble bee (RPBB) lives in colonies that include a single queen and female workers. The colony produces males and new queens in late summer. The RPBB mostly occupies grasslands and tall grass prairies while overwintering in wooded areas.26 A significant portion of the AUAR study area, extending from the Minnesota River to the Strunks Lake basin, is identified as a high -potential habitat for the RPBB. This high -potential zone continues south to Thole Lake and Odowd Lake and stretches westward as far as Gifford Lake. The RPBB may be impacted by a variety of possible activities associated with development, including herbicide use, pesticide use, land clearing, and soil disturbance/compaction. The use of native plant species, including flowering plants in seed mixes can be used to promote pollinator friendly habitat within grassland and shrubland in the study area. Additional mitigation measures could include the minimization of mowing during the RPBB foraging season, keeping natural areas un-mowed, using a high cutting height, and incorporating additional wildflower planting/restoration. Habitat surveys will occur in coordination with the USFWS to determine the potential for RPBB use on the property and potential effects to the species. If applicable, the DNR recommends reseeding disturbed soils with native species of grasses and forbs using Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) Seed Mixes27 or MnDOT Seed Mixes.28 The USFWS RPBB guidance29 provides guidance on avoiding impacts to RPBB and a key for determining if actions are likely to affect the species; the determination key can be found in Appendix F. 24 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Northern Long-eared Bat Habitat Map. Accessed 21 August 2025 and available at https://www.fws.gov/species/northern-long-eared-bat-myotis-septentrionalis/map. 25 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Tri-colored Bat Habitat Map. Accessed on 21 August 2025 and available at https://www.fws.gov/species/tricolored-bat-perimyotis-subflavus/map. 26 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Rusty patched bumble bee (Bombus affinis). 2025. Accessed 21 August 2025 and available at https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9383 27 Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources. Seed Mixes. 2025. Accessed 19 September 2025 and available at https://bwsr.state.mn.us/seed-mixes. 28 Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). Erosion Control and Stormwater Management. Vegetation. Seed. New MnDOT Standard Seed Mixes. 2025. Accessed 19 September 2025 and available at https://www.dot.state.mn.us/environment/erosion/vegetation.html. 29 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). ESA Section 7(a)(2) Voluntary Implementation Technical Assistance for Rusty Patched Bumble Bee. 2025. Accessed 19 September 2025 and available at https://www.fws.gov/media/esa-section-7a2-voluntary-implementation-technical-assistance- rusty-patched-bumble-bee. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 28 IRF 236 Monarch Butterfly The preferred habitat for the monarch butterfly is prairie with milkweed and flowering plants. Within the AUAR study area, the land identified for future development has been majorly previously disturbed by agricultural activity and other uses and does not currently contain native prairie vegetation. Consequently, the proposed development is not expected to substantially reduce the quality or extent of suitable monarch habitat in or near the study area. The use of native plant species in seed mixes could, however, promote pollinator -friendly habitat within the AUAR area. Whooping Crane Non -essential experimental populations of the whooping crane are classified as threatened on National Wildlife Refuge and National Park lands, requiring consultation under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA. On private lands, they are considered proposed species; Section 7(a)(2) consultation is not required, but Federal agencies must avoid actions that would jeopardize the species under Section 7(a)(4). The whooping crane's preferred habitat includes shallow marshes and surrounding open grasslands. No critical habitat has been designated for this species within the study area. While some potential habitat may be present within the study area, the AUAR boundary lies outside National Wildlife Refuge and National Park lands. As a result, non -essential experimental populations do not receive ESA protections in this area, and adverse impacts from the proposed development are unlikely. Minnesota Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance Minnesota Biological Survey (MBS) sites are within the AUAR study area and are concentrated northwest of Highway 169 largely within the Minnesota Valley State Recreation Area. MBS sites have varying levels of native biodiversity and are ranked based on the relative significance of this biodiversity at a statewide level. Factors taken into account during the ranking process include the number of rare species documented within the site, the quality of the native plant communities in the site, the size of the site, and the context of the site within the landscape. These include: • Nyssen's Lake — Moderate MBS Site — Sites ranked as moderate contain occurrences of rare species and/or moderately disturbed native plant communities, and/or landscapes that have a strong potential for recovery. • Gifford Lake Unit and Jackson 10 — Below MBS Site Biodiversity Threshold— These sites were determined to be below the minimum biodiversity threshold for statewide significance. These areas may have conservation value at the local level as habitat for native plants and animals, corridors for animal movements, buffers surrounding higher quality natural areas, or as areas with high potential for restoration of native habitat. Based on a review of the study area by the DNR's Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist (REAE), areas within and surrounding the Minnesota Valley State Recreation Area contain native plant communities and wetlands. Development within these areas would be of concern. The DNR recommends that the project be designed to avoid impacts to these ecologically significant areas. Actions to avoid or minimize disturbance include, but are not limited to, the following recommendations: • As much as possible, operate within already -disturbed areas. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 29 SRF 237 • Avoid MBS sites and rare native plant communities (NPCs) (ranked S1, S2, or S3). • Retain a buffer between proposed activities and the MBS Site. • Minimize vehicular disturbance in the MBS site (allow only vehicles/equipment necessary for construction activities). • Do not park equipment or stockpile supplies in the MBS site. • Do not place soil in the MBS site or other sensitive areas. • If possible, conduct the work under frozen ground conditions • Use effective erosion prevention and sediment control measures. • Inspect and clean equipment prior to operation and follow recommendations to prevent the spread of invasive species.3o • Revegetate disturbed soil with native species suitable to the local habitat31 as soon after construction as possible. • Use only weed -free mulches, topsoils, and seed mixes. Of particular concern are birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and crown vetch (Coronilla varia), two invasive species that are sold commercially and are problematic in prairies and disturbed open areas. Native Plant Communities As noted in the original AUAR, several DNR native plant communities are present within the northern portion of the AUAR study area, primarily within the Minnesota Valley State Recreation Area. NPCs are given a rank that reflects the relative rarity and endangerment of the community type in Minnesota. Ranks range from critically imperiled (S1) to secure, common, widespread, and abundant (S5). NPCs with a rank of S1, S2, or S3 are considered rare within Minnesota. As currently proposed, the following DNR NPCs have been delineated in the direct vicinity of the AUAR study area: • MRn93b: Spikerush - Bur Reed Marsh (Northern) — imperiled (S2) • FFs59a: Silver Maple - Green Ash - Cottonwood Terrace Forest — vulnerable to extirpation (S3) • MHs38c: Red Oak - Sugar Maple - Basswood - (Bitternut Hickory) Forest — vulnerable to extirpation (S3) • MRn93a: Bulrush Marsh (Northern) — vulnerable to extirpation (S3) • WMn82b: Sedge Meadow — uncommon but not rare (S4) • WMn82a: Willow - Dogwood Shrub Swamp — secure and abundant (S5) A calcareous fen (Seminary Fen, Fen ID No. 20977) with state -listed threatened plant species has been documented in the vicinity of the AUAR study area. A calcareous fen is a rare and distinctive peat - accumulating wetland that is legally protected in Minnesota. The Wetlands Conservation Act (WCA), authorized by Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.223, states that calcareous fens may not be filled, drained, or otherwise degraded, wholly or partially, by any activity, except as provided for in a management plan approved by the commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources. Many of the unique characteristics of calcareous fens result from the upwelling of groundwater through calcareous substrates. Because of this dependence on groundwater hydrology, calcareous fens can be affected by nearby activities or even those several miles away. To minimize stormwater impacts, the DNR recommends referring to the Minnesota 3o Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Contract, grant and permit requirements. "Come Clean, Leave Clean." 2025. Accessed 19 September 2025 and available at https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/invasives/dnrlands.html. 31 MN Board of Water and Soil Resources. Native Plant ID and Information. 2025. Accessed 19 September 2025 and available at https://bwsr.state.mn.us/native-plant-id-and-information. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 30 SRF 238 Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)'s General Principles for Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual.32 The DNR noted that calcareous fens are "Special Waters" and a buffer zone may be required. Calcareous fens may be impacted by activities within the fen, activities that affect surface water flows (e.g., stormwater flow, erosion), or activities that affect groundwater hydrology (e.g., groundwater pumping, contamination, discharge, or excavation). The DNR would have concerns regarding any activities that might affect groundwater flows, including groundwater pumping or discharge. To ensure compliance under WCA for specific projects, the DNR asked that the Calcareous Fen Program Coordinator, Keylor Andrews (Keylor.Andrews@state.mn.us), be contacted. If determined that a project will adversely affect the fens in any way, including indirect impacts through the alteration of hydrological conditions, the contact would need to be emailed before the project is initiated to discuss rare species survey process. The DNR noted that if the WCA is applicable to this project, to please note that native plant communities with a Conservation Status Rank of 51 through S3 or wetlands within High or Outstanding MBS Sites of Biodiversity Significance may qualify as Rare Natural Communities (RNC) under WCA. Minnesota Rules, part 8420.0515, Subpart 3 states that a wetland replacement plan for activities that modify a RNC must be denied if the local government unit determines the proposed activities will permanently adversely affect the RNC. If the proposed project includes a wetland replacement plan under WCA, the DNR Regional Ecologist33 should be contacted for further evaluation. There is WCA Program Guidance and Information34 can be visited for additional information, including the RNC Technical Guidance.35 1 HISTORIC PROPERTIES: An initial review request of the Minnesota Statewide Inventory Database was submitted to the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), as well as a review form from the Minnesota Indian Affairs Counsil (MIAC) to ensure compliance with Minnesota Stature 138.40, Subd. 3, and a review form to the Minnesota Office of the State Archeologist (OSA) to ensure compliance with Minnesota Statute 138.40, Subd. 3. Review requests were submitted on July 31, 2025. A reminder email was sent to MIAC and OSA on August 21, 2025, with a request to review by September 20, 2025 at the latest. Information regarding the historic properties/cultural resources reviews is available in Appendix G. SHPO replied indicating that they do not have capacity for this type of review request (for an AUAR update). As of December 11, 2025, OSA and MIAC have not provided a response, and a response is therefore unlikely. 32 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. General principles for erosion prevention and sediment control at construction sites in Minnesota. 2025. Accessed 19 September 2025 and available at https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=General principles for erosion prevention and sediment control at construction sites in Minnesota. 33 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Regional Plant Ecology Program. 2024. Accessed 19 September 2025 and available at https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/eco/regional-plant-ecology-program.html. 34 MN Board of Water and Soil Resources. WCA Program Guidance & Information. 2025. Accessed 19 September 2025 and available at https://bwsr.state.mn.us/wca-program-guidance-and-information. 35 MN Board of Water and Soil Resources. Wetland Conservation Act Technical Guidance on "Rare Plant Communities." November 2017. Accessed 19 September 2025 and available at https://bwsr.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/2019- 01/Wetland WCA Rare Nat Comm Tech Guidance.pdf. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 31 SRF 239 18. VISUAL: No changes were made to this section from the original AUAR. 19. AIR: Stationary Source Emissions Not applicable to an AUAR. Vehicle Emissions An updated traffic study is included in Appendix H. Overall, traffic generation is within the parameters of the original AUAR. Subdistrict C is the only subdistrict where traffic is expected to be higher than earlier estimates and is approximately two and a half times greater than the Max Build forecast. Based on this analysis, vehicle emissions are likely to be higher than anticipated in Subdistrict C. Dust and Odors No changes from the original AUAR. 20. GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) EMISSIONS/CARBON FOOTPRINT: An analysis on Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission/Carbon Footprint can be found in Appendix I. A new measure has been added to the mitigation plan update (Appendix B) based on a comment from MnDOT (Appendix J) received in October 2025. MnDOT indicated that because this AUAR proposes expansion of Minnesota Highway 41 as part of its mitigation, any proposed highway expansion would trigger a GHG Impact Assessment according to Minnesota state law as of 2023. A project that adds lane capacity of more than a half mile (2,500 ft) or creates a new interchange on the highway system will need to assess the added tailpipe emissions and vehicle miles travels (VMT) and offset those emissions. 21. NOISE: Construction Noise No changes from the original AUAR. Traffic -Related Noise No changes from the original AUAR, except for Subdistrict C. Subdistrict C's estimated daily trip comparison is 267% of Max Build daily trips. Traffic -related noise is likely to be higher than anticipated in Subdistrict C, based on the analysis of daily trips. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 32 SRF 240 22. TRANSPORTATION: An updated transportation analysis memorandum was completed and is included in Appendix H. Key findings from the update are summarized below: • Infrastructure Review: Several mitigation measures from the original AUAR have been implemented or are planned. These are summarized in Table 2 and Figure 1 of Appendix H and are documented in the Mitigation Plan Update (Appendix B). • Land Use Changes: Updated land use assumptions reflect a shift toward more residential development, particularly in Subdistrict C, and less employment than the original Max Build scenario assumptions (see Table 11 below). Note that the employment estimates for the AUAR Update are based on square footage assumptions and conversion factors discussed in Appendix H. Employment is defined as number of employees. Table 11: AUAR Land Use Scenarios Land Use Type Comp Plan Max Build 2025 AUAR Update Residential Units 1,154 2,013 2,918 Retail Employment 141 1,610 52 Non -Retail Employment 1,366 8,392 3,499 • Trip Generation: Updated daily trip estimates fall between the 2040 Comp Plan and Max Build scenarios. However, Subdistrict C shows a substantial increase in projected trips, indicating the need for further infrastructure evaluation (see Table 12 below). Table 12: Daily Trips Comparison Subdistrict Daily Trip Comparison Comp Plan Max Build 2025 AUAR Update A 6,201 13,793 7,044 B 3,809 30,723 8,763 C 284 4,901 13,071 D 3,011 13,793 6,596 E 254 1,166 1,165 F 58 - - G 3,455 4,850 4,552 Total Daily Trips 17,071 69,224 41,191 Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 33 SRF 241 • Updated Mitigation Needs: Based on updated traffic forecasts, the revised mitigation measures are summarized in Table 13. Mitigation updates are based solely on projected traffic volumes and operations; other factors such as safety, warrants, and/or policy may also necessitate future improvements. Key takeaways include: o Most remaining mitigation measures remain valid, however four intersections may no longer need improvements due to reduced traffic volumes or changes in access. o Mitigation is still needed at six intersections. o New mitigation measures have been identified at three locations and are consistent with previous studies completed within the area. Table 13: Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Update Intersection Improvement Summary May No Longer Be Needed CR 78/Emery Way Construct signal or roundabout CR 69 10th Ave Cha arral Ave / / p Construct signal or roundabout. Reconstruct Chaparral Ave to align with 10th Ave. p g CR 69/Vierling Drive Any signalization will need to meet signal warrants. It is assumed that a future signal will be constructed at this intersection when warrants are met. CR 69/CR 16 Extension Construct signal or roundabout CR 78/CR 77 Construct SB right- and EB left -turn lane Mitigation Still Needed MN 41 Construct 4 -lane divided roadway MN 41/Rail Frontage Rd Construct a traffic signal CR 69/US 169 Ramps Construct signal or roundabout CR 78/Emery Way Construct SB left -turn lane CR 78/CR 15 Construct signal with turn lanes or roundabout CR 15/128th Street Construct NB and SB left -turn lanes New Mitigation Marystown Road/US 169 Ramps Construct turn lanes CR 78/CR 73 (Zumbro Avenue) The intersection will be monitored, and mitigation will be implemented in the future if necessary. A signal or roundabout would not meet Metropolitan Council's Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 34 SRF 242 Intersection Improvement Summary spacing requirements for the planned Future Principal Arterial. Subdistrict C Provide direct internal connections to CR 69 and CR 15 Note: NB = northbound, EB = eastbound, SB = southbound, WB = westbound Overall, this AUAR transportation update reflects current development conditions and provides refined traffic and infrastructure guidance through 2040. Ongoing monitoring is recommended to assess the timing and need for mitigation as development progresses. 23. CUMULATIVE POTENTIAL EFFECTS: Cumulative effects result from the incremental impact of proposed projects (of any scale) added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions, regardless of what agency or person undertakes such other actions. Past actions are typically defined as all actions that have led to the built environment in the study area today. This effects analysis discusses recent past actions, rather than attempting to define all past actions in history that have led to the built environment in 2025. This section has been updated to include recent past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects. Table 17 and Table 18 provide a summary of recent past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. Table 17 represents projects within the AUAR study and Table 18 represents project just outside of the study area, in which the project could impact the same resources as those being reviewed as part of this AUAR. This update includes a change in development in Subdistrict C that has occurred (Highview Park Development Project), as well as consideration of the future of nearby Louisville Township. Information is also included regarding the Windermere Development (recent past action just outside of study area), the LaTour Development (reasonably foreseeable action just outside of the study area), as well as several other developments.36 These developments are part of a larger trend of conversion from farmland or undeveloped land to residential, park, commercial, or industrial uses. The sections that follow Table 17 and Table 18 specifically go into detail on the incremental impacts of the Highview Park Development, the Windermere Development, the LaTour Development, the Countryside 3rd Addition, the Breeggemann Development, the Bauer Property Development, the Palomino Trail Development, and the River Valley Business Park. Several of these developments can be viewed on the City of Shakopee Current Development Map. Table 14: Projects proposed within the AUAR study area, by any entity Project Timeline or Type Transportation Development Other (e.g., energy, utilities, recreational, etc.) Recent past (constructed within the last five years) • County Road (CR) 69/78 Roundabout • Highview Park • South of 130th Street (CR 78) and along Zumbro Avenue, a total of • Jackson Commons/Township Park o A nature -centered park with both active and 36 City of Shakopee. Current Development Map. Accessed in November 2025 and available at City of Shakopee Current Development Map. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 35 SRF 243 Project Timeline or Type Transportation Development Other (e.g., energy, utilities, recreational, etc.) • CR 78 Pedestrian Underpass • • • approximately 600 single family and twin home residential unit subdivision including four phases by D.R. Horton. Countryside 3rd Addition Industrial/Colburn Drive River Valley Business Park passive areas developed in partnership with Jackson Township. Present (being constructed) N/A • • Highview Park 5th Addition Breeggemann/Bluff View Phase 1 o 132 dwelling units on 47 acres. A minimum of 15% open space as landscaped areas or areas available for the common use of and accessible by all residents or occupants of the buildings within the planned unit development. N/A / Reasonably• foreseeable• (planned,CR programmed, and/or / permitted, but has not started) • 16 Extension (southwestern southwestern portion) • Breeggemann/Bluff View Phase 2 Bauer Property nvi w Gree e o 193 residential lots, just south of Highview; g currently undergoing annexation, MUSA/Comp Plan Amendment, zoning and platting. • SPUC Substation — Pending Review e e w of property o Rezoning ro ert Y located at 2022 Colburn Drive from R-1 B to I-1 and conditionally Y permit an over -height electrical substation. Table 15: Projects proposed adjacent to the AUAR study area, by any entity Project Timeline or Type Transportation Development Other (e.g., energy, utilities, recreational, etc.) Recent past (constructed within the last five years) CR 78 79 • / Roundabout • Palomino Trail (Tamarack Road) o A Pulte Homes single- g family residential development west of Windermere Way along • Marystown Dog Park o Approximately pp Y three- acre park with areas dedicated to large and small dogs. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 36 SRF 244 Project Timeline or Type Transportation Precreational, Development Other (e.g., energy, utilities ' etc.) • 17th Ave, received Preliminary Plat approval in December 2024 to construct 83 new homes. Windermere Development Project o Six different additions of single-family home neighborhoods south of US 169, between Marystown Rd and Old Brick Yard Rd. Construction in summer 2025. • Miracle Field of Shakopee, within Tahpah Park o Opening in Fall 2025; an adaptive baseball field that will ensure that children and adults with disabilities can play baseball in a safe, welcoming, and inclusive environment. Present (being constructed) • • Marystown Road Improvement Project (at US 169) CR 16 Extension (partially) • • Blakely Apartments o Located in the southwest quadrant of the US 169/Marystown Rd interchange; a 205 -unit market rate apartment building by Roers Companies. The building is currently under construction. Gateway Townhouses Located north of US 169 between Lincoln Street, Vierling Drive West, and Taylor Street, which consists of 43 units that have been approved. Construction began Summer 2024. N/A / Reasonably foreseeable (planned, programmed, and/or permitted, p , but construction has not started) N/A • LaTour r Development a ou o 120 dwelling units; concept p plan only. N/A Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 37 SRF 245 Highview Park Development Project Since the original AUAR, a new development has been under construction, known as the Highview Park Development Project (within Subdistrict C), with homes built by D.R. Horton, Inc., on land newly annexed by the City of Shakopee. The proposed project included 601 total homes (509 single-family homes and 92 twin homes), and a neighborhood clubhouse on approximately 234 acres with associated public roads, utilities, site amenities, and stormwater ponding, located south of CR 78 (130th St W) and west of CSAH 15 (Marystown Road). The 92 -unit twin home sub -neighborhood was planned for the northern portion of the site. Ponds and wetlands are scattered throughout the entire site. Comparing the original and current (2025) land use assumptions indicated that the proposed residential densities increased from the original AUAR assumptions. At the April 18, 2023, Shakopee City Council meeting, there was approval to Adopt Resolution R2023- 043, approving the Preliminary Plat of Highview Park. It was noted that the applicant D.R. Horton Inc., and property owners William & Jean Luers, LaTour Farms LP, David Brown, and Harriet Plekkenpol, applied for a rezoning and preliminary plat of property located south of CR 78 and east and west of Zumbro Avenue. The developer planned to grade the property in two phases beginning spring/summer 2023. The first phase would be the northern portion of the site encompassing about 100 acres. The remaining phase would be graded in subsequent years. The street and utilities would be built in four phases with the first phase started in summer 2023. Depending on market conditions, the entire site would be developed over the next five years. The final plat for Highview Park consists of five additions across the development. • On July 5, 2023, Shakopee City Council adopted Resolution R2023-080, approving the first addition of Highview Park consists of 106 acres and 172 units, including 122 single family homes and 50 twin homes. This property was rezoned to R-2 Medium Density Zone, in the northwestern portion (which consists of the twin homes), with the balance rezoned to R-1 B Urban Residential. • On April 2, 2024, Shakopee City Council adopted Resolution R2024-045, approving the second addition of Highview Park consists of 39 single family lots and 42 twin home lots developed in three locations within Highview Park. The northern portion consists of the 42 twin homes. The east side of the development consists of eight single family lots on the extension of Elbert Drive. The western side consists of 31 single family homes west of Zumbro Avenue. • On June 4, 2024, Shakopee City Council adopted Resolution R2024-087, approving the third addition of Highview Park consists of 42 single family homes. This property is zoned R-1 B, Urban Residential Zone. • On April 15, 2025, Shakopee City Council adopted Resolution R2025-005, approving the fourth addition of Highview Park consists of 115 single family homes. This property is zoned R-1 B, Urban Residential Zone. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 38 IRF 246 • On April 15, 2025, Shakopee City Council adopted Resolution R2025-036, approving the fifth addition of Highview Park consists of 73 single family homes. This property is zoned R-1 B, Urban Residential Zone. Traffic Study The Highview Park Residential Development Traffic Study37 was completed in 2023 to understand the impacts from higher density development. In addition, access assumptions have changed since the original AUAR, as it was unknown when the proposed development will have a roadway connection to CR 69 (Old Brick Yard Road). Existing Conditions Existing conditions were reviewed to establish a baseline to identify any future impacts associated with the proposed development. The evaluation of existing conditions included a review of traffic volumes, roadway characteristics, and an intersection capacity analysis, which are summarized in the following sections. It was found that all study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall Level of Service (LOS) A during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, with the existing geometric layout and traffic control (see Table 14). Table 16: Pre Highview Park Development (Existing) Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay CR 78 / CR 69(1) A/A 7 sec. A/A 9 sec. CR 78 / CR 73(1) (Zumbro Avenue) A/A 6 sec. A/A 5 sec. CR78/CR 15(2) A 9 sec. A 9 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst side -street approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. (2) Indicates an all -way stop control, where the overall LOS and delay are shown. 2030 Build Conditions To identify potential impacts associated with the proposed development, traffic forecasts for year 2030 conditions (i.e., the anticipated year of full build) were developed. The year 2030 conditions accounted for planned adjacent developments, general background growth, and traffic generated by the proposed development. To account for general background growth in the area, an annual growth rate of one and a half (1.5) percent was applied to the existing peak hour traffic volumes to develop year 2030 background forecasts. This growth rate was developed using a combination of historical average daily traffic (ADT) volumes from surrounding roadways as published by MnDOT, traffic forecasts from the Scott County 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and engineering judgment. SRF's traffic study of Highview Park further indicated that there were multiple known residential developments planned and/or expected to develop north of the proposed development, as shown in Exhibit 1. These include the Windermere development, which was under construction in 2023, as well as the Breeggemann, LaTour, and Bauer property developments, which are adjacent to the Windermere development, and expected to develop in conjunction with the CR 16 roadway extension to CR 69. In 37 SRF Consulting Group. Highview Park Residential Development Traffic Study; Shakopee, Minnesota. Memorandum provided by SRF Consulting to Mike Suel, Land Development Manager, DR Horton. February 2023. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 39 SRF 247 addition, approximately 450,000 SF of industrial development was expected west of CR 69. For the purpose of this 2023 traffic study, all developments, along with the CR 16 extension, were assumed to be completed by 2030. Therefore, to account for the adjacent development traffic, trip generation estimates were developed using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition and distributed to the adjacent roadway network. These adjacent developments accounted for approximately 95 a.m. and 115 p.m. peak hour trips along CR 78. Exhibit 1: Residential developments planned and/or expected to develop north of the proposed Highview Park Development (as included 2023 Highview Park Residential Development Traffic Study) Indirstria CR 7 CC BMW Deridopment La Tour DOVEdoprnon Fur Devirplopment LEGEND • Assumed v -loped by 2030 - Assumed Developed by 2040 CR 16 Epyiisiun P Mme. Devolopment iirtreute Southeast Dovehripment Table 17: 2030 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis To determine how the study intersections will operate under year 2030 build conditions, an intersection capacity analysis was completed using Synchro/SimTraffic software. It should be noted that a single - lane roundabout was assumed in the analysis at the CR 78/CR 69 intersection. In addition, the northbound/southbound approaches of the CR 78/Zumbro Avenue intersection were assumed to be configured as a shared thru-right and left - configuration. Results of the analysis, summarized in Table 15, indicate that all study intersections were expected to operate at an overall LOS B or better during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In general, side -street stop delays and queuing were expected to slightly worsen as area development occurs (i.e., from adjacent developments, background growth, and the proposed development). However, no operational or queueing issues were expected within the study area. Intersection A.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay P.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay CR 78 / CR 69 (3) A 6 sec. A 7 sec. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 40 SRF 248 Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay y CR 78 / RI RO Access (1) A/A 3 sec. A/A 7 sec. CR78/CR73 (Zumbro Avenue) () A/A 9 sec. A/B 13 sec. CR 78 / CR 15 (2) B 11 sec. B 13 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst side -street approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. (2) Indicates an all -way stop control, where the overall LOS and delay are shown. (3) Indicates a single -lane roundabout, where the overall LOS and delay are shown. 2040 Comp Plan Review In addition to a year 2030 analysis, a 2040 Comp Plan scenario was also reviewed to determine if any additional long-term improvements were necessary to accommodate the current development proposals. The 2040 Comp Plan traffic forecasts documented within the Jackson Township AUAR were modified to reflect the updated land use and access for the Highview Park development, as well as adjacent residential developments to the west and southeast. These adjacent residential developments were not expected to be constructed by 2030, but were assumed to be completed by 2040, and therefore, were included in the sensitivity analysis. The 2040 Comp Plan scenario forecasts were modified, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to determine if any additional long-term improvements are necessary to accommodate the current development proposal. The detailed sensitivity analysis tests were completed using Synchro/SimTraffic software. Note a single - lane roundabout was assumed at the CR 78/CR 69 intersection and the 2040 Comp Plan mitigation was assumed at the CR 78/CR 15 intersection (which was previously identified to be left -turn lanes on each approach). Results of the review, shown in Table 16, indicate that the updated land use assumptions may accelerate the need for traffic control improvements at the CR 78/CR 15 intersection. In addition, side - street stop control movements at the CR 78/Zumbro Avenue may be challenging during the p.m. peak hour. Table 18: 2040 Comp Plan Update - Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay CR 78 / CR 69 (3) B 10 sec. B 16 sec. CR 78 / RIRO Access (1) A/A 3 sec. A/A 8 sec CR78/CR73 (Zumbro Avenue) () CR78/CR15(2) A/B 13 sec. A/D 34 sec. E 37 sec. F N3 min (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst side -street approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. (2) Indicates an all -way stop control, where overall LOS and delay are shown. Assumes left -turn lanes have been constructed on all approaches. (3) Indicates a single -lane roundabout, where overall LOS and delay are shown. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 41 SRF 249 Results of the analysis indicated that the updated land use assumptions may accelerate the need for traffic control improvements at the CR 78/CR 15 intersection, and side -street movements may become challenging at CH 78/Zumbro Avenue intersection. Improvement recommendations were identified (e.g. ensure that a direct connection is made to CR 69 as part of future development west of Highview Park, and that traffic control improvements are expected to be needed at the CR 78/CR 15 intersection by 2040). A review of the proposed site plan was completed to identify any issues and recommend potential improvements regarding internal roadways, access, traffic controls, and circulation. In general, all roadways within the proposed development were expected to function adequately as two-lane facilities. Internal intersections were expected to operate adequately with side -street stop control. As development occurs, it was recommended that internal intersections should be reviewed to determine if a higher level of traffic control (i.e., an all -way stop) should be considered. It was recommended that special consideration should be made to limit any sight distance impacts from future landscaping and signing along Zumbro Avenue, and at all internal and external intersections within the study area. Wetland Impacts In terms of permitting for the Highview Park Development Project, the USACE provided project authorization on September 19, 2023, with a determination that the project would be authorized by a Nationwide Permit (NWP) or a Regional General Permit (RGP), specifically NWP 29, Residential Developments. The project proposed 36,267 SF (0.83 acres) of permanent impact to five wetlands for construction of the project. The Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) met on July 11, 2023, to review the project and agreed with the avoidance and minimization efforts provided. Replacement was proposed via the purchase of 1.67 acres of wetland credits from Wetland Bank No. 1682 in Scott County. It was indicated in the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision that the replacement met the siting criteria. Land Use Change, Farmland, and Vegetation Impacts This property was rezoned as an Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone. The developer's request was to rezone the northwestern portion (which consists of the twin homes) to R-2, Medium Density Zone, with the balance to be rezoned to R-1 B, Urban Residential Zone. This property is guided Suburban Residential (3-6 dwelling units per acre) and Suburban Edge Residential (0.01 — 3 dwelling units per acre), which was noted as consistent with their proposed concept plan. It was indicated that the developer would propose homes compliant with the design and performance standards for those zoning districts. The developer noted that trees were generally clustered around the homesteads and mainly consisted of Oak, Ash, Boxelder, Cottonwood and Spruce, among a few others. Impacts to the previous land use include conversion to impervious, as well as reductions in natural vegetative cover. Based on a GIS analysis, farmland impacts were approximately 220 acres within the development area and vegetation impacts were approximately 12.4 acres. City, County, and SPUC staff spent considerable time discussing details of this project with the applicant, their consultant, and Jackson Township representatives. As part of this project, the developer provided a significant amount of park dedication fees that the City utilized to create improvements to the Township's Jackson Park (located at the southwest corner of CSAH 78 & CSAH 15/Marystown Road). The design of the park improvements was a joint effort between the City, developer and Jackson Township. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 42 IRF 250 Additionally, City staff were in discussion with county staff, the applicant, and Jackson Township on design options for a pedestrian crossing of CSAH 78 at Zumbro Avenue with a final design to be developed as part of the final plat should their application be approved. This specific development exceeded the magnitude that was reviewed in the original AUAR; therefore, an additional measure was added to the end of the mitigation plan update (Appendix J) to prevent this occurrence in the future. Windermere Development Project The Windermere Development, located within Shakopee, but outside the AUAR study area, is a large, mixed -use neighborhood located on the west side of town near US 169 and Marystown Rd, featuring a variety of housing, parks, and commercial spaces. This property was part of the West End Study Area, which City staff, the public, the Planning Commission and the City Council reviewed and approved. The Windermere Development includes commercial properties and about 600 housing units ranging from senior apartments to townhomes and single-family homes. The development also includes senior living communities like Benedictine Living Community as well as Windermere Park. Windermere Park is part of the overall Windermere neighborhood development. It features a variety of innovative playground equipment, natural areas, a hammock grove, and an observation tower. As noted in the Shakopee 2040 Comprehensive Plan, initial phases of the Windermere Development began in 2017, coinciding with the initial phase of the 17th Ave extension which is planned to ultimately connect to CR 69. Retail uses were planned near the Marystown Rd/US 169 interchange with potential additional smaller retail nodes near the intersections of Chestnut Blvd and CR 69 and Marystown Rd. Six total additions make up the Windermere development as listed: • On August 8, 2018, Shakopee City Council adopted Resolution R2018-082, approving the final plat of Windermere South. The property is approximately 69 acres and is located south of 17th Ave, west of Marystown Rd, north of CSAH 78. It consists of 31 single family homes. Additional phases included approximately 158 total lots. • On August 21, 2018, Shakopee City Council adopted Resolution R2018-094, approving the second addition of the Windermere Development. It consists of mixed senior residential properties on 9.2 acres, including 144 independent living, 40 brownstones, 43 assisted living and 24 memory care units (251 total). The property is zoned R-4 High Density Residential. • On July 21, 2020, Shakopee City Council adopted Resolution R2024-087, approving the third addition of the Windermere Development. It consists of 33 single-family residential lots and a lot for the Existing Friendship Church. The lots would be accessible off Astoria Dr and CSAH 78. The development generally appears as two separate neighborhoods, with a trail connection between the two cul-de-sacs. The population density is within the requirements of single-family residential and R-1 B zoning. • On March 16, 2021, Shakopee City Council adopted Resolution R2025-005, approving the fourth addition of the Windermere Development. It consists of approximately 53 acres with a new development area of 40.2 acres. The development includes 126 single-family residential lots, 75 lots that would be 55 feet wide and 51 lots that would be 65 feet wide. The population density is within the requirements of single-family residential and R-1 B zoning. • On July 20, 2021, Shakopee City Council adopted Resolution R2025-036, approving the fifth addition of the Windermere Development. It consists of 39 acres and 57 single-family residential Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 43 SRF 251 lots and an out lot for future residential construction. The population density is within the requirements of single-family residential and R-1 B zoning. • On July 19, 2022, Shakopee City Council adopted Resolution R2025-036, approving the fifth addition of the Windermere Development. It consists of 14 acres and 43 single-family residential lots. The proposed lots would be accessible from CSAH 78 and Zumbro Avenue via Arcadia St. The population density is within the requirements of single-family residential and R-1 B zoning. Traffic Study SRF's Highview Park Residential Development Traffic Study accounted for this development, which at the time of the study was under construction but largely completed. The traffic study noted that Scott County had partial funding allocated to extend CR 16 from CR 15 to connect with CR 69 as part of their 2021-2025 Capital Improvement Plan. The extension of this roadway is developer driven as it provides access to development in the area but also provides a more direct and continuous facility. A portion of this roadway was built in 2018 to facilitate the Windermere Development. The Willows Apartments On April 17, 2018, Shakopee City Council approved a comprehensive plan amendment to change the land use from medium density residential to high density residential, as well as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment for a 60 -unit affordable apartment complex and preliminary plat. CommonBond proposed 60 apartments on one lot, and an out lot for future commercial development. In relation to a multi -family lot, the R-4 zoning district was adopted by the City Council in December 2015, which would allow (with a density allowance) 14-28 units/acre. The proposed density of this project was 18.5 units/acre. The out lot to the north would be further platted as commercial lots in the future. This property was part of the West End Study Area, which City staff, the public, the Planning Commission and the City Council reviewed and approved. A smaller higher density development was approved originally in the West End plan, but when the final plan was approved, the project was replaced with a lower density townhome project. Since that time, D.R. Horton found less of a potential demand for townhomes and was in the process of reconfiguring the original concept with this development. It was indicated that the project as proposed for approval as part of the PUD does not create a hardship on the City and County long range plans for this area nor create a hardship on the specific neighborhoods of this development; and therefore, there was support for granting approval of their requests. Windermere EAW Update As discussed at an August 21, 2018, Shakopee City Council Meeting, Metropolitan Council requested that D.R. Horton complete an update the original EAW. D.R. Horton, Inc., Westwood Professional Services, Inc., WSB & Associates, and the City of Shakopee worked together to prepare an EAW Update for the Windermere development. This EAW Update included current information pertaining to the Windermere development, and how it relates to the previously approved Bluffs of Marystown EAW from 2006. The site area for the project was calculated at 323 acres, while the Bluffs of Marystown EAW identified a total net site area of 264 acres consisting primarily of commercial development (10.4 acres), single family development (470 lots) and multi -family development (456 units), with an overall density of 3.5 units/acre. The Windermere Development, as proposed, comprised of 12.8 acres of commercial development, 590 single family lots, and 350 units of multi -family, with an overall density of 4.3 Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 44 SRF 252 units/acre. This incorporates the Windermere South development, which had a proposed density of approximately 3.0 units/acre, which was considered consistent with the current comprehensive Ian guiding for this area (and is mandated by the Metropolitan Council in order to receive approval of sewer permits for the project). After distribution to the EQB distribution list for review and responses to comments for additional information, it was determined by City staff that the EAW Update for the Windermere Development is consistent with the approved 2006 Bluffs of Marystown EAW, as no significant environmental impacts associated with the project (based on an analysis of a variety of topics including land use, geology, stormwater, wildlife habitat, traffic, water use, wastewater generation, cultural resources, and noise) were found. It was noted in the EAW Update cover letter that the proposed project results in less impact to natural resources than the approved 2006 EAW, and changes to public infrastructure are negligible. Countryside 3rd Addition Project The Countryside 3rd Addition Project, also referred to as Lusitano St (Property ID 279131002), by Link Construction, Inc., is located immediately south of Cubasue Ave on a new street called Lusitano St. The development consists of single-family homes by Donnay Homes. On March 7, 2024, the Shakopee Planning Commission had a public hearing for the preliminary plat of Countryside 3rd Addition. Donnay Homes and Link Construction submitted a preliminary plat for 5.44 acres in the area that is by 17th Ave and Marystown Rd. This area was annexed by the City and granted MUSA by the Metropolitan Council. It is zoned Urban Residential (R-1 B). The preliminary plat was for 17 single family lots on the extension of Lusitano Street. Lusitano St would end in a temporary cul-de-sac. The development was noted to exceed the Metropolitan Council's required three dwelling units per acre. Homes were noted to be generally similar to those constructed to the north. The development to the east is existing rural residential homes located within Jackson Township. City staff shared stormwater and landscaping plans. City staff recommended the planning commission support the approval at city council. As of 2025, several of the homes have been built. Wetland Impacts According to a Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision sent on December 28, 2023, Jacobson Environmental delineated the site located at Property ID 279131002 on behalf of the applicant and determined no wetlands exist on the parcel. The TEP field -reviewed the site on November 1, 2023, and agreed with the determination of no wetlands. River Valley Business Park Opus Development Company proposed development at 2175 Colburn Drive (Property ID 279150390) for a new River Valley Business Park, which includes industrial buildings intended to accommodate a large variety of tenants. The development is located at the southwest corner of US 169 and Old Brick Yard Road (CR 69) with current addresses of 3000 and 3050 Emery Way. This development added substantial impervious cover to the site (10.3 acres in just impervious related to the buildings). A December 13, 2021 Concept Site Plan showed that the total site area would consist of 147.6 acres. On January 1, 2023, a Phase 1 Site Plan from Kimley-Horn indicated that the total land area was 64.1 acres for the (Phase 1) Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 45 SRF 253 Business Park. Construction was completed in December 2023. There are two large speculative industrial buildings that have been constructed. Wetland Impacts According to a Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision sent on November 9, 2022, the applicant completed an offsite hydrology and wetland determination and on -site verification of the area. The offsite investigation did not reveal any areas meeting wetland criteria. The onsite verification supported this assessment. It was noted that development by the applicant will not impact wetlands because none exist on the site. The site area is approximately 51 acres. Breeggemann Development Project (Bluff View Addition) The Breeggemann Development Project, also known as the Summergate-Shakopee-Breeggemann project, or Bluff View Addition, was also noted as a future development project in SRF's Highview Park Residential Development Traffic Study. In February 2023, Summergate Development (the applicant) and R & J Breeggemann Partnership (the property owner) proposed a PUD District and a preliminary plat for property located north of LaTour Ave (adjacent to the SPUC water tower in the Windermere neighborhood) and west of Zumbro Ave. The applicant proposed a single-family residential subdivision (Bluff View Addition) that would develop approximately 85 acres with a net development area of approximately 60 acres. City council meeting notes from March 2025 state that the development would consist of 247 single family lots, 176 with reduced width lots, and 189 lots with reduced six foot side yard setbacks. The property is guided suburban residential and park/open space. The open space requirement was noted to be met with the proposed land and trails located along the north area of this project, adjacent to the bluff which has been earmarked as a future linear/open space park and trail corridor as part of the regional trail and park system presently being implemented in this area of the community. The City has already acquired the land to the east (Property ID 279140201). This will be a passive/open space park since there are known threatened and endangered species in the bluff area and there is an upper and lower trail. The amendment matches the bluff condition that was previously approved in 2022. The property was presently zoned Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone and guided Suburban Residential (3-6 units/acre) and Park/Open Space. The proposed project was consistent with the existing guidance for that zoning. As of March 4, 2025, the property is zoned PUD at 222 lots with 127 reduced width lots and five foot side yard setbacks. The updated amendment would allow 247 single family lots as previously mentioned. Wetland Impacts A letter from the USACE, dated July 29, 2022, provided approved jurisdictional determination for this project area. The review area contained no waters of the United States subject to USACE jurisdiction. According to a Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision sent on July 27, 2022, a wetland delineation was performed at the project site, and no wetlands were identified. Members of the TEP field -reviewed the delineation on June 13, 2022, and agreed with the assessment that no wetlands were present. Palomino Trail Development (Tamarack Road) Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC (the applicant) and Randy & Lisa Kubes (property owners) applied for a preliminary plat of the Palomino Trail Development. The property is located north of CSAH 16/17th Ave, Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 46 SRF 254 west of Windermere Way, and south of US 169. The applicant proposed a plat that would consist of 83 single-family residential lots on 31.8 acres, with the City owning the adjacent 23.6 -acre open space parcel (Property ID 279140201). The proposed lots would primarily be accessible off 17th Ave (CR 16), with the northern section tying into Windermere 2nd Addition and the southern section tying into Windermere South 4th Addition. The development was considered compliant with the requirements of the single-family residential guiding and the R-1 B zoning. The plans included a proposed substantial stormwater pond located just north of the trail along 17th Ave (CR 16), and another trail connection from lots along Linwood Cir to the east. Multiple trails as part of a greater greenway are planned within this area. City departments, Scott County, and other agencies (external to the City) were given the opportunity to review and provide comments regarding this application. The City Council approved of the preliminary plat for Palomino Trail at a December 2024 meeting. Construction was noted as expected to begin later in 2025. The final plat for Palomino Trail was approved at the April 1, 2025 meeting. Wetland Impacts According to a Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision sent on November 7, 2024, Kjolhaug Environmental Services completed a wetland assessment within the project area. One area was investigated and determined to be upland. This site was previously reviewed and a 'no wetland' decision was issued in 2020. TEP members did not have any comments on this assessment. LaTour Development Project The LaTour Development is adjacent to the Windermere Development and is expected to develop in conjunction with the CR 16 roadway extension to CR 69. D.R. Horton refers to this development as "Amberglen Express Premier." An 80 -acre Jackson Commons Park, a nature -centered park that includes the Farmstead Bike Park, was created for this area, with most amenities completed by spring 2025. The park includes both active and passive areas developed in partnership with Jackson Township. The LaTour Development also includes 121 mixed residential homes, across a 33.2 -acre site area, including a 4.2 -acre park. Bauer Property Development The Bauer Property Development was noted in SRF's Highview Park Residential Development Traffic Study as a future development and is located immediately north of LaTour Development and west of the Breeggemann/Bluff View Development. The Bauer Property is located east of Old Brick Yard Road (CR 69) and south of 125th St in Jackson Township. No development has occurred yet. As of October 2025, there's a 29.1 -acre parcel (Property ID 069140120) and 9.45 -acre parcel (Property ID 069140130) at this location that is planned to be developed in the reasonably foreseeable future. Louisville Township Some extent of additional development is also anticipated in nearby Louisville Township. The City of Shakopee currently does not have an orderly annexation agreement with that township and therefore does not have jurisdiction with the community's land use or development. Though development in Louisville Township is not reasonably foreseeable (planned, programmed, or permitted), it is worth mentioning for the long-term landscape of cumulative potential effects. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 47 SRF 255 As noted in the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the land use discussion and designation for Louisville Township is not intended to be the official land use designation. It is described as a Rural Transition Planning District consisting primarily of agricultural, residential, and natural open spaces. The MUSA does not extend centralized sewer to this area, and therefore only development supported by well or septic exists. A concentration of agriculture is in Louisville Township where farmland and farmsteads are prominent. The MUSA is not planned to extend to this area during the life of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan; it indicated that agricultural uses should be maintained, and that development should be discouraged until other portions of the planning area are built out. Much of the land has been purchased by the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community (SMSC). As noted in the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan, SMSC is a federally recognized sovereign tribal nation. The SMSC is governed by the General Council, which consists of all adult members of the SMSC, and the Business Council, which is responsible for enacting the vision, values, goals and direction of its people. Adjacent to the AUAR study area, SMSC has already purchased land up to 150th St. The SMSC holds significant land areas within Shakopee, in surrounding Scott County, and adjacent communities. Much of the SMSC lands are held in trust, with minimal intent for development. The City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan notes that Marystown is an unincorporated community in Louisville Township along Marystown Rd. The community is centered on the Marystown Catholic Church, built in 1882. The Catholic Church is on the National Register of Historic Places, and the community offers a rural style of living. Recommendations for the Louisville Township area include incorporating farmsteads into future residential design, screening future development from right of way with landscaped buffers, preserving ridge line along bluffs and providing public access, clustering new residential development to preserve open space, and preserving the rural character of Marystown. 24. OTHER POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: No change from the original AUAR. Jackson Township Development Area — 2025 AUAR Update 48 SRF 256 Appendix A Figures • Figure 1 — State Location • Figure 2 — Study Area • Figure 3 — USGS 7.5 Minute • Figure 4 — Wells (Minnesota Well Index) • Figure 5 — Cover Types • Figure 6 —Zoning Jackson Township Development Area — AUAR Update SRF 257 ilom4 • "I troporo ••••modriao Imipawmairsk mia.kiimmhk Study Location Shakopee Scott County, MN O O • O Otsego MINN SOT 241 101 Rogers Ramsey Dayton \And ka Andover am Lake ANOKA COUNTY Champlin , Coon Rapids Blaine INHESOTA Corcoran Map : Grove —HENNEP COUNT Medina Victoria 41 Chalk f-/ Plym+ th Mi. Lino Lakes Brooklyn Pa �• I Shoreview [MRIESOTAI North NEI Oaks ,F idl�.yI i 1 4 1 n Ce er( F •. Vadnais Heights Gold • n Saint Loui • rk '[MIN,ESOTA rr YINXESOT. [MINNESOTA Eden Prairie [ MINNESOTA. 101 Shakopee MI.NESOTA �'MNHESOTA SCO SIBLEY U �, `s `��/� Be rMIHYESTA C O U IVT 1 CC Plaine Legend 0 Study Area Municipalities p - J County Boundary Highways Interstate Highway US Highway State Highway Streams Lakes State Location J f Ct--� [WINNESOTA 93 LE SUEUR COUNTY [MINNESO , El 169 Prior Lake TT TY Bloomin on avage u sville R seville I e [MINNESOTA RAMS Y COUN Y 'Saint Pa MINNESOTA [EaXXEsorA 62 [MINNESOTA ' [WIN NESOTA ,[MINNESOT IMINNESO 14 gan Apple Valley L I/ DAKOTA Lakeville COUNTY a e e Farmingtoi cL4,1 I RICE OUNTY [MINNESOTA EI 0 5 10 Miles Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update City of Shakopee Figure 1 258 Giffor, Louisville Legend Study Area Park Boundaries —+— Railroad DNR Public Water DNR Public Watercourse ,_=_l Municipal Boundary L! ' County Boundary L -J PLSS AUAR Study Area Mobile Manor VINEM Q b R23W Chanhassen - Sec. 2 � ; . TN RAGUETy�P ' 1115N ---- - R23W VII, LD I FE .,R23W *, MANAGEMENTAREA ..� -.� Shakopee Ri erview Vierling Tahpah Park/Schieper Jackson Township Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update City of Shakopee Sec. 1j3 Tfl5N 130th Jackson Figure 2 259 Legend Study Area USA Topo Maps USGS Topographical Map Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update City of Shakopee Figure 3 260 cc 0_ cti co 0 AL LL CD a (O 0 cra N 145th cit a Legend Q Study Area 1500ft Buffer Drinking Water Supply Management Area Vulnerability - High Low Moderate MI Very High - Very Low Minnesota County Well Index (CWI) Jackson - Heights Mobile Home Park Wells By Use • Domestic G. Monitor Well • Test Well Industrial Railroad DNR Public Water DNR Public Watercourse i= Municipal Boundary I_1 County Boundary Mobile Manor Mobile Home Park Brookhaven Shakopee 0th Avenuh West Jackson Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update City of Shakopee Shakopee 2024, Scott aldolA County 2024 Figure 4 Curve 261 LO CNA u) 0 u) L cp Louisville Legend Study Area Parcels Railroad ;:=:I Municipal Boundary L - County Boundary Proposed Protection Area USA NLCD Land Cover 2024 Open Water Developed Open Space Developed Low Intensity Developed Medium Intensity Developed High Intensity Barren Land Deciduous Forest Evergreen Forest Mixed Forest Shrub/Scrub Grassland/Herbaceous Pasture/Hay Cultivated Crops Woody Wetlands Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands Chanhassen 12th Avenue Shakopee DJIrr,j HI AUAR Cover Types 10th Avenue 3oth!Street Jackson Miles n 2024 mage Source: Carver County 2024, ScottlCou ty Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update City of Shakopee Figure 5 262 Path: L:\Projects\19900\192341GI5_ProjectslArcGI5_ProlShakopee AUAR Update251113.aprx Legend I:I Study Area DNR Public Water DNR Public Watercourse L_: Municipal Boundary Shakopee Zoning Districts - 2025 Agricultural Preservation Business Park Community Commercial I High Density Residential Highway Business Light Industrial Medium Density R esd t" I Park and Open Space Planned Unit Development Rural Residential Urban Residential Scott County Zoning - 2025 General Commercial Rural Industrial Heavy Industrial Urban Business Reserve Urban Expansion Reserve Urban Expansion Reserve Cluster 0.5 I d1l11l111111tk e+!JUl1,11#1 1 Imageispurce:fprygnapunty 2024* 5cv�t ountyl,2U24 Land Use and Zoning Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update City of Shakopee Figure 6 263 Appendix B Mitigation Plan Jackson Township Development Area — AUAR Update IRF 264 SRF SRF Project No. 19234 From: Date: Subject: MEMORANDUM Mark Noble Senior Planner, Planning Division City of Shakopee Lydia Statz, AICP, Sustainable Planning Project Manager, SRF Consulting Group Jana Guseynova, Environmental Planning Project Manager, SRF Consulting Group Alicia Bock, Environmental Planning Lead, SRF Consulting Group 12/11/2025 Mitigation Plan Update for Jackson Township Development Area - AUAR Update Mitigation Plan Introduction This Mitigation Plan has been prepared as part of the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the Jackson Township Development Area, completed for the City of Shakopee to review the potential comprehensive impacts from the development of the City's Orderly Annexation Area in Jackson Township. The AUAR identified the impacts anticipated to result from the development planned within the City of Shakopee 2040 Comprehensive Plan (also referred to as Envision Shakopee). The mitigation plan identifies the steps to be taken by the City and/or other responsible parties to avoid or minimize environmental impacts and to mitigate for unavoidable impacts. This Plan was prepared in accordance with the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board's Environmental Review Program, Minnesota Rules 4410.3610. This Plan addresses the mitigation methods to be implemented for impacts that could result from the study area development scenario examined in the AUAR. The AUAR determined that impacts related to traffic, surface water, ecologically sensitive resources, utility infrastructure, and potential environmental hazards could result from planned or proposed development. The section below summarizes the impacts and the specific mitigation measures to be implemented to avoid, minimize, or alleviate impacts. A table is included that identifies the potential impacts, proposed mitigation efforts, and responsible parties. www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 I Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 1763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 265 Mark Noble City of Shakopee 12/11/2025 Page 2 of 16 Responsible Parties The implementation responsibility for many of the mitigation methods identified in this plan will lie with the City of Shakopee. The City's review and approval of developer plans, permits, and other approvals will serve a checkpoint to identify measures to avoid impacts and/or mitigation plans. City approval of development plans will be dependent upon reaching agreements with the developer(s) regarding plan elements to reduce environmental impacts, mitigation to be performed for unavoidable impacts, and financial and regulatory assurances that the mitigation plan will be implemented. In addition, the City will inspect the development as it is constructed, or will, through other means, ascertain that the prescribed measures are implemented. However, developers are ultimately responsible for implementing mitigation measures in accordance with plan review and permit requirements. Agencies other than the City of Shakopee also have authority for determining compliance with the regulations within their jurisdiction as part of the approval and permitting requirements. These agencies include, among others: Scott County; Metropolitan Council; Lower Minnesota River Watershed District, Scott Watershed Management Organization; the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA); the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT); the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR); and the Minnesota Department of Health. The AUAR and this mitigation plan list permits and approvals required by these and other governmental regulatory agencies. Responsibility for obtaining all required permits and approvals and for providing mitigation required as part of those approvals lies with the developer(s). Identified Impacts and Proposed Mitigation Plan The following italicized text is from the Environmental Quality Board guidance document, Recommended Content and Format Alternative Urban Areawide Review Documents: 1 Mitigation Plan. The draft and final AUAR documents must include an explicit mitigation plan. It must be understood that the mitigation plan is a commitment by the RGU to prevent potentially significant impacts from occurring from specific projects. It is more than just a list of ways to reduce impacts —it must include information about how the mitigation will be applied and assurance that it will. Otherwise, the AUAR may not be adequate and/or specific projects may lose their exemption from the individual review. The RGU's final action on the AUAR must specifically adopt the mitigation plan; therefore, the plan has a "political" as well as a technical dimension. 1 Environmental Quality Board (EQB). Recommended Content and Format: Alternative Urban Areawide Review Documents. 2008. Accessed 2 September 2025 and available at https://www.egb.state.mn.us/sites/eqb/files/documents/AUAR%20guidance%20%28form%29%20-9-09.pdf. SRF 266 Mark Noble City of Shakopee 12/11/2025 Page 3 of 16 Based upon the mitigation plan guidelines summarized above, the following table identifies the resource area, anticipated impact, mitigation action, and responsible party. Status is included in the table as ongoing (from the original 2020 AUAR), complete, new (added with the AUAR update), or not applicable (N/A). SRF 267 O Ni Mark Noble LO 0 a) n6 a_ City of Shakopee a W •_. " 0 _ O 43 _ Q can O 0 Z Z O O1 2 Summary of Impact Resource Area O 0 a) z 'O 0 o) O 0 C C >, a) •— O }' a) o_ co a, 0 N O •- C - c6 O }' V 5 O L_ a) 0 a) a) 0 L_ a) 0 a) a) 0 L_ a) O a) a) 4- -a vI a) O E .D C = a) o o u '5 0 0 Q •- .'- a) 0 C (0 co co a, Vu D LE c 0_ o O a) -I-1 o • ≥ (7)O (V C N a) E 0 a) }, 0 o X Q a) C C Z CD 0 L 4- 4 ._ Q 75 a) a) a) 4-1 U 4- a) E a) co C 2 a) co O t/) O r 2 J a C 0 4- co C co 0) L_ 0 a) C .(0 4- 0 a) +-;0 ' cu § E 4 0 E CU a) vI N a) : a3 D V ID _O 7) 0_ oz E ._ S- (1) w +. }' U CU L- CD_ Q L) +-, -0 U § Q („, u CD O_ � ��av) c a) C C O v0 ro co .471 S - N O _c 4- 0 c6 +a U V O L 0 f 0 U ro CD • 0 > •ca •+7, u a) D 2 cu ,-+ C c6 > E O O v E C Q+� •O ca - Q 0_ O o > _ CU 73 0 +O > � C N � � � . -> ca Ol 73 •� C ca — O C N 73 w c6 N no DI CU C 73 u 0_ E u(0� vvi U< N 4-+ -o C , a) a3 Q O O •- v) O • N N O 75 c6 i) ,_ ca) O V o_ >, . (0 -o - o o_ C � V = 0 � N a) }, t4= .O O ca Q }' v V Q O O 04ru> — '-o._O the wetland. 0 vI c0 0- E 0 C� O >, +-► (0 C a) a) +.0 v V) 0 -o E 0) _ 73 W 4 O °73 O W3 v) o a) DE a) N u L Q 73 .- 0 the wetland. 4- C a) F 0- O a) .(1) a) a) 0 oc Erosion and Sedimentation DNR public waters -o (0 4- a) a) D cu 73 C vi •O o 5; 2 t O O 73 O Q C a) C 3 no 0 4- >, CU 75 ro V_ CU O •7, C 0 C v) LL W (/) a) 73 C : a) 0 75 V_ a) O •7, C O C u- W (/) O Ln 0 C6 a_ Mark Noble a a; = a o .-C z VI 0 12.•O tnn�VZZ CY) 0 Ongoing DI .p 0 O) 'O cn 0 a) .12 •N Co W (5 Wa L_ _O a) 0 City of Shakopee ' O- 0- Q O O Tu a_ _c N Liv)a Q _O cu N a Mitigation Best management practices will be deployed during construction for areas that drain to the Minnesota River. Bluff areas within Subdistrict A should be preserved in accordance with local long-range plans. Future development in close proximity to the Minnesota Valley State Recreation Area must not interfere with enjoyment of the natural resources/ recreational uses (e.g. noise issues). Future development should avoid/minimize impacts to native plant communities and wetlands within and in the vicinity of the Minnesota Valley State Recreation Area. At the time that development is proceeding, consult with the DNR regarding potential botanical survey requirements. 4.1 La O caU E VI ': v) a) ; E p p U v)D DC G pV .-• a) ca a--, N . O Q _ .4=' u r6 c a) E 'Q N S— The build scenario includes potential development near existing bluff areas. The build scenario preserves the land within the Minnesota Valley State Recreation Area as a natural/recreational resource area. Potential noise, visual, etc. impacts may from development in close proximity. CVI o V 0 ' X N O O) N •— v) to Q LE O a--+ _ O V V >, CD S — CU > E C13 O in a) 2 Bluff Area (X3 C 0 O }, a) >, cD N 2> v) ce Q V) a--+ CU c6• C O_ D CU E > z ra u w i 3 C — 5, u V VI a) 3 0 oc > a) Fish, Wildlife and Ecologically Sensitive Resources a) C 0 — oc V • >cu . — V a) C CD 73 v . — V a) L_ 0 oc CU a..) Mark Noble City of Shakopee a W _ O " �O = eg) E sc7 v, . uZZ Summary of Impact Resource Area O E N N • • • • • I- DI 'O cm O Q 0 Tu a) 0 minimization measures are o c :a a) � ca E -o o N cu Q 0 a) 0 Lco L O V)L .C a) O 0 O a) cu .�o Qa) Q +� .�co C 4 4-' D _O v) N O > Q N 0 C 'D oQ a) n a) ^ C CU Q 4) a) Q — v viO 03 ' n co O v Q _O •— cn CU O a L.) O O O> v CU CU p s_ a; O '+ , N C }, ��CD .N� �� (13 Q>� u E �N a) }' �' — cn v Q C •— 0 C ca `) O Q CU L.- . Opa,pCQ0 0v,•CC 0 4 4- • co L c6 C 4- 4- CD a) 0 a) 0 � LA 0 Cl V) CU u E Q • vI fu a) L_ c6 a) vI vI a) .a) Q > co C 4- .p a) 0 4- vI fs 4- > ce • L_ a) — co 0 0 co co LE co 0 a) a) co a) 0 .� vI Q vI (13 C 0 4- s_ vI C 0 L.) -o a) -o a) vi 'O cn 0 vi a) '0 a) 4- 4— O v) 73 LE a) cD a) C 0 a) L— a) ra D I v CU " CU CL >,p C O 3 L X • co .C O o V 4- > C 0 V C co v) co V .C 0 4- O -o 0 a) co a--, co v) a) .V a) vi .� 03 ._ 0 c6 co v) a) . Q .C 4- co E a) 0 0 Q co CD -o c6 73 .L a) E E O vi 03 a) L_ C Q 0 a) 0 4- 73 R-.3 O CL) 4 E E Q. O x0 a)2 > Q 73 -O 0 v v O C -' 0 D v o ca E v) a) 4- m 2 m c675 O � v — CD 01 >, > C _O cn C O "a) m cn v) a) -oL_ C : co 0 a) v) >,� a3 a, 5. o •) O C u' v a) UwV) Mark Noble O I --- W (6 O_ a) a) O (6 Cn 0 O L 0 _ 4 = F E 1 V RS CU O V Z cy, C O Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing CU _ CL VI i. Ce a I. V a) CU Q _O - N -C > (f) 0 0 Developer, City of Shakopee Developer, City of Shakopee Developer, City of Shakopee Developer, City of Shakopee C (13 • Calcareous fens may not be filled, drained, or otherwise degraded, wholly or partially, by any activity, except as provided in a management plan approved by the commission of the DNR per the MN Wetlands Conservation Act. • Any activities that might affect groundwater flows, including groundwater pumping or discharge should be avoided. • Any adverse effects to calcareous fens, including indirect impacts through the alteration of hydrological conditions, must be reported to the DNR. • Tree removal must be avoided within Silver Maple - Green Ash - Cottonwood Terrace Forest native plant community (T 115N, R 23W, Sec. 9). • Consult with the DNR at the time that future development is proceeding to determine if a rare species survey is required. Tree removal must avoid the bat pupping season (approximately June - July). • Future development should avoid disturbance to undisturbed grassland areas. • Tree and shrub removal from May 15th through August 15th should be avoided. Tree removal must avoid the bat pupping season (approximately June 1 - August 15). Commitment to winter clearing (November 1 - March 31) is recommended. V co 0. E (13 E v, C D +-' N V L V a) v, 4O 11_cn 0 a) Q V .-O a O c ci a) s • x V v, Proposed development within or near the Cottonwood Terrace Forest. Required tree removal for infrastructure and development. Required tree removal a n d ground disturbance for infrastructure and development. Required tree removal for infrastructure and development. cn C a) u_ tn D O a) L_ ('3 V (, U Butternut Little Brown Bat and Big Brown Bat Lake Sparrow and Purple Martin Northern Long - Eared Bat ns Q CU U O CC a) >, 4— (13 cn -OV_ a) a) O O (7, O C -0 O C LA iiw Li) CC Fish, Wildlife and Ecologically Sensitive Resources Fish, Wildlife and Ecologically Sensitive Resources Fish, Wildlife and Ecologically Sensitive Resources Fish, Wildlife and Ecologically Sensitive Resources N O NI co a) N (0 .—a- Mark Noble DI C 'O 0 DI C O cn 0 a) a) Q E O C O cn 0 C O 0 DI C 'O cn 0 a) a) Q E O z z a) I. a) Q E O z z V a) a) 5 Q Q O _O Co N _c > Vi D O i- 0 0 2 cu cu O Co v) a) O Co v) 4— O c) cu Q >, O 'w C C O V) U C 0 O V) Scott County C Oo u O O > v) D C O O V) Scott County C o O u O O > v) D • Consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to c)hiO _CU aci) -0 O E E +7, D Q a) _0 a) C -0 a--' a--, a Co y O N Co O (a v) Q +>'+ .c : 73 v) O N O v) CT Ca v a; a) D Q O cU 4) F N • _MT ca Tu C •Cru a) O >, c o a, a, O > +, LE a) 0 c m cu F O > 73 a) 4— C Co Construct a 4 -Lane Divided Co cn z 2 O Co vi CU O s_ Q Q Co a) L i � cu V) C Co S- a) L - V) O U C O N ai .� CU 4— S- 0 ra Q Construct a traffic signal (1) Construct a traffic signal or roundabout (1) Co a) E w a) I I Co a) C C 4 — CU C O I' 0 V) Co U L- -I-, V) C O U intersection (1) Construct a traffic signal or roundabout (1) a) CZ O F F O V V Co 0 a) c Co I, — C i a) +-, a) i > O E 73 C O V) CU > a CU O Construct a westbound Construct left -turn lanes at the side -street approaches (1) Construct a traffic signal or roundabout (1) a) Co O F F O V V Co 0 c Co +, — C i a) a--' a) I > O o E 73 C O V) CU > a CU O Construct a westbound Cocu 0 Q Ca Co Construct left -turn lanes on Required tree removal a n d ground disturbance for infrastructure and development. cn C a) CoC cu v) LA N a) - E v, N a) ›N - ca O CO Ti O E _c•� N v Co V) C CU C O O N 4- v, co ' o CO +-' a) - 72 E E D a) D v, +J U +� +-, cn o E C (IS E N > V W 0 oC „co o v ' N U 73 om L- c .C N u w a) .' N= E N> w _ vI O W L- O CU O Q = VI v' < a) O D O Co 2 < _0 O Co § p p Q .— .— .— Rusty Patched Bumble Bee MN 41 and Rail Frontage CR 78 and Emery Way CR 78 and CR 69 CI I, - CC V 73 C Co CO N. CC V a) Li- -o i..� v cU v .� : O L O -0 O C co w cn r Mark Noble O a) na a_ a) a) a 03 V) 0 O L 0 71 a = a e (in O V Z Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Complete Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing w Scott County Scott County Scott County Scott County, Developer Scott County, Developer Shakopee, Scott County Shakopee, Scott County Shakopee, Scott County Shakopee, Scott County, MnDOT Shakopee, Scott County, MnDOT Shakopee, Scott County, Developer Shakopee, Scott County, 0 o VI 1. CU W a C Construct a traffic signal or roundabout (1) Construct a southbound right -turn lane and a westbound right -turn lane (1) Construct left -turn lanes on all approaches (1) Construct eastbound and westbound left -turn lanes (1) Construct a southbound right -turn lane and eastbound left -turn lane (1) Reconstruct Chaparral Avenue to align with 10th Avenue to create a 4 -leg intersection (1) Construct a traffic signal or roundabout (1) Construct a traffic signal or roundabout (1) Construct a traffic signal or roundabout (1) Construct a traffic signal or roundabout (1) Construct a northbound and southbound left -turn lane on CR 69 (1) Construct a traffic signal or roundabout (1) CO 2 CO a) O) (6 , c v; cum a) a,) _ L- cz E 2 c 4- O .- > V O a, v, a, - > — O Q . _ � — _ O O 'a-=, 4i v- c > 2 O w ozi ca E 41 � ma, N 2 ca N § cu E N 0 >-O c .C D E N > c DC v v 0O v a) a) - cn O Era _G) (ll> Q a) v 4- L-. a) = O a) Q Q 3 cn cn cup o (a a p p Q -O Q _O 4_, 0 [a '§ Q . . .— CR 78 and CR 15 CR 78 and CR 73 CR 78 and CR 77 CR 69 and 10th Avenue/ Chaparral Avenue CR 69 and Vierlin Drive CR 69 and US 169 North Ramp CR 69 and US 169 South Ramp V _C C 'E i c6 n 0 cn O1 •- Z -O m u V cr Q Q ca aw 1. Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Q C) La 1. 3 0 v c- 0 W (13 F- Mark Noble 0 CU C6 a_ City of Shakopee 3 Vn Summary of Impact Resource Area V '4- '4 - CD F - Q 0 .Q 0 0 cu 4--+ a) 0 E VO z z 0 0 a) N 0 al cu 0 cn a) 0 CU - 0 O i C N > V) V 0 cu 0 cn 4- 4— 0 cn 5 O '4, C 0 o V o F- o O 0 CD C cs 2 o O - p C6 C v) 2 Scott County o O 0 C6 C &i 2 o O 0 CD C v) 2 Construct a northbound and southbound left -turn lane 0) L0 CZ 0 Construct a traffic signal or roundabout (1) Construct a northbound and southbound left -turn lane cL V 0 Construct a traffic signal or roundabout (1) Construct a traffic signal or roundabout (1) Construct a traffic signal or roundabout (1) Construct Westbound Right -Turn Lane Construct Northbound Right -Turn Lane 4- a) E : cn • v) D CD vi "' • v • a) all C ▪ — N • -0,13 a s a) C CL LE : cu'ACL) t,L) 1 5 ai - E Q c a) }, CD v a--+ N . — • CD - O c� .a--' - • -6 >,•—-0 F >,>N> C c a) a) O cu - C 3 CD O • 0) •2 C (t) • 0 -t ate, 0 O - . N a) /3 N D N co 2 C a• s--+ • V Q N Q 0 4- aD co oc V 4- c 4- 0 CD >,75 o 2 cc 4- zo- E 0 co CDo 2 cc 4- 0 V) L0 0 F cc LO V 75 oc V -0 t C 0 0 � z C 61 LO 0 D 03 75 2 CD ci E cc 0 F ce V 4 - CD F - V 4 - CD F- Mark Noble l- 0 l- na a_ N O 03 0 O L 0 6 a) •- _ v1 0 ^ 3 cil 4 _ E 5 vl Ca 8 Z N Z N Z C •O O C •O O Ongoing 70 .N = 0. v1 I. CL Scott County, Developer Developer Q 0 a > 0 Q 0 a� > cu Developer in coordination with Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (SPUC) 0 co 2 Restrict to a 3/4 access or construct a traffic signal or roundabout Provide direct connections to CR 15 and CR 69 Implement dust control measures (e.g. apply water to exposed soil and limit the extent and duration of exposed soil conditions). Limit construction noise to daytime hours in accordance with the City's noise ordinance per City Code 130.45. Construction equipment house be fitted with mufflers and properly maintained. Noise mitigation measures should be identified as future development occurs (e.g. installation of noise barriers). Extend trunk water main and other water distribution features to accommodate expansion. U CO 0. E 0 (5 E 3 cil Various construction activities will be required to achieve the development proposed within the Build Alternative. The range of activities are unknown at this time, though there is a potential for noise and dust from activities. As a result of the planning development within the AUAR study area, and forecasted increases in background traffic levels, traffic volumes will increase on roadways in and adjacent to the study area. This increase in traffic may result in increased volumes in the study area. As a result of future development, the existing water supply system will need to be extended to provide service to new areas. CR 78/CR 73 (Zumbro bro Ave) Subdistrict C C O U D Q) +7 0 Li V Q N �O z U 4- CO F- Water Supply (5 4C - U 0 VI a cc Traffic Traffic O(13 U z o C C uo co -o izu 4z (I) N • o i-z Infrastructure and Public Services Mark Noble O CD O_ a) a) O (6 Cn 0 O L 0 c._ _� *+ t OCan E 0 (inn o Z Complete N E O u Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing w 70 sitt CL a V D Cn V D V) Developer in coordination with SPUC Developer in coordination with the City of Shakopee Developer in coordination with the City of Shakopee City of Shakopee C CO Construction of additional supply well #23 (Well #23 needed to support development outside of study area) Construction of a 500,000 -gallon elevated storage tank Extend city water service as development occurs. Extend sanitary sewer service as development occurs. Construct force main and gravity mains throughout study area to provide sanitary service to development areas and allow for future extension Construct lift stations to service study area and future development areas. Two lift stations are identified within study area, of which one was recently completed (West End Lower Bluff LS). Two additional lift stations will be needed beyond the study area to service adjacent growth. U CO 0. E 0 E E cn New development areas will increase the water supply need, along with increased needs from surrounding development areas. New development areas will increase the water supply need, along with increased needs from surrounding development areas. As a result of future development, the existing water supply system will need to be extended to provide service to new areas. As a result of future development, the existing sanitary system will need to be extended to provide service to new areas. As a result of future development, the existing sanitary system will need to be extended to provide service to new areas. >, Q a D N a) a) c0 +� Cn 03 aw Q C) V 3 0 C) w Infrastructure and Public Services Infrastructure and Public Services Infrastructure and Public Services Infrastructure and Public Services Infrastructure and Public Services Infrastructure and Public Services Mark Noble l - O M C O_ N 0 MI Cn 0 O L 0 .3 O1 _ a) ci Oco�z 0 V Ongoing N z N z N z CU .N _ 0 C�Ga , o_ 0 0 Vv Developer in coordination with the City of Shakopee Q 0 - 0 CU 0 -0 `~ S Cra - Q a •O- - c3 O L- 0= 0 - 0 0 0 •� <auv-o C 0 c v cU D -' nD° Developer, in coordination with City of Shakopee 0 co 2 Expansion and water quality improvements of the Upper Valley Drainage Ditch (regional facility). Continue to employ City policies and regulations for onsite surface water management. Stormwater runoff will be permitted through the LMRWD or SWMO. Consult with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), Office of the State Archeologist (OSA), and the Minnesota Indian Affairs Council (MIAC) regarding existing data and any requirements/recommendations regarding cultural resource evaluations and field surveys. Consult with the Minnesota SHPO under Section 106 of the Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (36 CFR 800) when using federal funds, permits, or authorizations in a federal undertaking. Should archeological materials be discovered at a project site, communicate with SHPO, OSA, and other agencies as appropriate. Any land acquired or developed with LWCF monies cannot be converted to anything other than outdoor recreational use unless replacement land of at least equal fair market value and reasonably equivalent 4, V co 0. E _ (5 E E VI As a result of potential development, stormwater water runoff rates may increase with increased impervious surface in the study area. Increased volumes may impact existing facilities. As a result of potential development, stormwater water runoff rates may increase with increased impervious surface in the study area. a) L (3 a) allt N LE cO U Z N Vn c3 0 v Q -' ca 0 V) Q.ca _O N O O co j 4 v < 0 0 N ,_ O cn N As a result of potential development, there may be potential impacts to parks funded by the LWCF. The L_ ra N D +a 0 ca � O a3 0 C c") oC >1 ca 0) L - 0 � 0 v 4- >, co — O v v v Q Q 2 Section 6(f)/Land and Water Conservation (5 i Q i C) CC N v cn (O cn Infrastructure and Public Services Infrastructure and Public Services V U. 2 o Infrastructure and Public Services O O Mark Noble L O a at = : 42 ca' E (in o z O sr) Z w a c 0. •- o L) ° C- o - • (a ucn °• o O *; CO �� �, usefulness is provided. Guidelines to submit a conversion request are available on the DNR website.2 4- Q _C a) - _ ca a--, • ca �, C C O N �, a) ,•-. a, D' —O ~ C 03 O ca a) > E 5 -c - O N cn N _ vi .v > ra N> Q C O ra }' a) v a) a, w E a) (13 a— u a) ca O > O `nCY) v L.n >, cV ca 0 O •� •� •E Q a) a) L O ra u O a) `n -, • — a, -O a3 N •• - C a) r6 a, — a) `f' -O a) +, a) -i a) c -O ' cn C N — U O D ra E '5 O O E c ca c a) ( >, •- a) cn a) C •v, rE3 }, c }' >, _C ra DI N v ca -, NO N _C - ' v) + - I- L 0) C' O N a) "3 D i_• ELI2 cn O p O -O 2 p a) C v > `� • E a) cm > • — ra c -O C� L- _o ra O ra = v Q •}' a, Q E L' L7 a O._ it •— : '�, a) C _L O IA — Q ca p ca O X N O v_45 'cn 'cn > ca v, }, v, , D - - • — — O= a) a) cu , • a3 LI 03 . 7) v L) •� I- Q O _ ra •E _ a) a) •0 p •� u a) . > > • • • .-. .� - co +� — O O u . _ • +� c a) E -O C E -O O ra cn C a3 F- • +-, cn C a 1 �' cn � 0 (Lis +J +J 0 O -O a) c ? +� C _ N E 0 c 4- N a) CU E u }, • �n a) c (a a) - O -O a, a) ca a) ra v D cn v c v, v N Do o .� . c Q a) ,_ a) +� cn ca (0 .C '— Q ca • — O- J O- O Z N a) -C • • • • F- 4 co O E E VI MN Valley State Recreation Area within the study area is on the Minnesota DNR list of grant funded parks. a) v, _73 Q ra 4-+ a) D "+ 0 O2 4-1U O_O O > v ro i c i O C Q c a 8_.2 E v) > C Q 4- ra C CU 0 . O C _ +-, a) a) O >, o >, ra E D • C ra a) r6 r6 C = � a) CU Q 0' a _+ 0i O-) I F COm aLE < Fund (LWCF) Act V CO o_ () F E — a) I 0 < (5 (1)s_ Q i O UI cC _0 a)V � v)^ 'L O Q = c a) .� O - � w (3 O E X a) C C O co C ca vi www.d n r.state. m +�I c'3 a) co co co Ln N O L(1) 0 E v a) V V Lr1 N O N Mark Noble x- 0 V) x- 0 CZ a) o r6 v) O O e3 e3 VI L O a aW = a cn E _ w ,(.)z a) z • w _ OW 1. cea L a) c C • O O a) +� a) N C N O c O uv, °s C 01 2 GHG emission project impacts and offset.3 If a development exceeds what was reviewed in this AUAR update, and the City would like to approve the development, then an update to this AUAR must be made prior to development approval/construction OR an individual EAW or EIS must be completed, depending on the mandatory category thresholds that are exceeded. An individual EAW is required if a proposed project meets or exceeds any of the mandatory thresholds outlined in Minnesota Rules 4410.4300, unless the project is consistent with the AUAR Update that specifically addressed that type and magnitude of development. An individual EIS is required if a proposed project meets or exceeds any of the mandatory thresholds outlined in Minnesota Rules 4410.4400, unless the project is consistent with the AUAR Update that specifically addressed that type and magnitude of development. V ca) E O RS E E cil a) C CU IA iii a) -o -o o C a) a) Q co _a a) O D C — ;� Q 4-1 W C C -0 a 4_,— N N vi o_ —D•+7, c -0 aj O O o E }, ra N a+ Q a) 0_ • — c LA a) - -1 -o Q E oO o- D VD r6 cay) 4-, +-, w C a--' C W C +' -0 a) +-� v) a) E a) a) C E c -0 Co c _ O o to .-. o V F _c .� LA o .50 a w c E Q> c v)w 4-'w — V)I- ca i Q C i 0 CC V) +-, N w _ _� ., V 0_ C L n V C a) E 0 L si To Cl) O a a) L a) (7, C 0 V a) 0 + -, Cl) L co C 0 V Cl) v, v, LE C Cl) F C a) 7 N C a) E Cl) > O L 0 .E Cl) C CO O 0 CD • C C CD 0 co a) 0 C CO a) E c 0 co C 773 > a) n 0O X co 2 a) + a-,3 a) O a) ID o 73 Cl) CD O C Cl) L co N C 0 C C 03 Cl) n N L n 0 N C a) E 0 O _ a) > a) N CO Cl) Cl) .> Cl) L a) ID 0 N C co 0 N LE 0 0 4j a) c. c Cl▪ ) 7 v, c 0 V co c co 0) E a) F- ai cB E v, v E _C O > L, ca C CO vi C CD 0_ c Cl) E _O v v assessment.htm www.dot.state.mn.us 3 MnDOT. Capacity Expansion GHG Emissions Impact Assessment Procedure Guidance. Accessed 30 October 2025 and available at htt Mark Noble City of Shakopee 12/11/2025 Page 16 of 16 Future Environmental Concerns or Impacts Not Anticipated in this AUAR and Mitigation Plan Although steps have been taken to identify potential future conditions based on the best information currently available, as development plans are completed and more information becomes available, or as regulatory requirements change, environmental concerns or issues that differ from those addressed in the AUAR or Mitigation Plan may be identified. Also, new information or mitigation methods may be developed after the approval of this Plan. In these instances, the development plans would be reviewed to identify measures to avoid, minimize and mitigate for impacts consistent with the new information, while maintaining the basic intent and process identified in this Plan. Action(s) Beyond the Scope of this AUAR and Mitigation Plan The City is responsible for permits/approvals and related mitigation for regulatory issues and impacts under its local jurisdiction (e.g., traffic improvements). Private developers are responsible for obtaining all permits necessary from all governmental agencies having jurisdiction over their development. www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 I Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 1763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 280 Appendix C Wastewater Management Memo Jackson Township Development Area — AUAR Update SRF 281 SRF To: From: Date: Subject: MEMORANDUM SRF Project No. 19234 Alex Jordan, P.E. City Engineer, City of Shakopee Alicia Bock, Lead, Environmental Planning 9/12/2025 Wastewater Memo — Jackson Township Development Area - AUAR Update Wastewater Memo Introduction You (Alex Jordan, P.E., City Engineer, City of Shakopee) provided a review of sewer system information to SRF on September 10, 2025, indicating that the AUAR update is consistent with the original AUAR and the City's Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. A figure was provided (see Figure 1, Enclosures) showing sewer that has been installed within the study area since the original AUAR. Enclosures • Figure 1 — Planned and Completed Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extensions 1 City of Shakopee. City of Shakopee Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. Adopted by the Shakopee City Council under Resolution R2019-135 on December 17, 2019. Accessed 12 September 2025 and available at https://cros2.revize.com/revize/shakopee/Documents/Government/Department/Public%20Works/Sanitary%20Sewer/Sanitary%20Se wer%20Master%20Plan.pdf. www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 I Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 1763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 282 £■■■IIILL liriP may. p U U A A l A A 0 p 1` lithr•IL - if" i 7-7 0 unnol • • Appendix D Stormwater Management Memo Jackson Township Development Area — AUAR Update SRF 284 -SRF From: Date: Subject: Kirby Templin, Environmental Engineer Alex Jordan, PE, City Engineer City of Shakopee Erin Hunker, PE, CFM SRF Consulting Group, Inc. September 3, 2025 Jackson Township Development Area — AUAR Update Stormwater Memo Introduction MEMORANDUM SRF Project No. 19234.00 The Jackson Township Development Area AUAR was developed by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. (SRF) in February 2020 (hereon referred to as the 2020 AUAR). The Stormwater section in the AUAR still applies to this update. Stormwater Improvements All built or approved developments are consistent with the City's 2040 Planned Land Use map and have followed the design and permitting requirements for stormwater management in the project area. Figure 1 shows the stormwater BMPs and infrastructure that have been added along with associated developments since the 2020 AUAR. The portion of the AUAR area located north and west of TH 169 will need to be further studied and understood as development occurs. 19234 Jackson_AUAR Update StormwaterMemo www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 I Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 1763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 285 LEGEND - Built/Approved - Estimated by 2040 - No Change Expected by 2040 1= - Subdistrict Area - Storm Detention Areas - Updated since 2020 1500 ft 4500 ft Open Space/Palk 10 Open Space/Park 2 Open Space/Park 1M SF Business Park 19 21 Corms 10 KSF Expansion Boat Dealer 190 KSF Business Park 4 eloped 0 24 50 Xcel Sri station 29 Mobile Home Pads 500 KSF Business Parr Nyssens Lake 30 Single Family (not expected to sell) / 15 14 300 KSF Irw'ustrial 130 DU Residential 32 150 KSF Office 37 38 39 42 43 44 45 46 47 750 KSF skies Perk Open Space /Bluff to 22 23 2 130 DU ResttleMlal......... 25 280 DU Residential 120 DU Residential 85 DU 4.5 KSF Expansion Vete., ainic 225 DU .......... ......................... kesidential 290 DU Residential F Park 14 KSF Medical Office 24 KSF Retail 138 DU R sidentai Fully Developed (Residential) €10 588 DU Residential X71 1]85 Torres 15 16 Not Este 30 DU Residential Until"' 30 DU widest„,, 14 209 DU Residential 31 DU Residential 17th Avenue r 17 DU Realdenflal 82 DU Residential (3 DUA) CR 78 S RF Updated Land Use Assumptions Shakopee AUAR Transportation Analysis Update 02519234 October 2025 City of Shakopee Figure 2 286 Appendix E Contamination Review Memo Jackson Township Development Area — AUAR Update SRF 287 SRF To: From: Date: Subject: Mark Noble Senior Planner, Planning Division City of Shakopee Alicia Bock, Environmental Planning Lead SRF Consulting Group 9/26/2025 MEMORANDUM SRF Project No. 19234 Desktop Contamination Review for Jackson Township Development Area - AUAR Update Contamination Review Introduction Potential environmental hazards and agricultural chemical contamination sites were reviewed as part of a desktop contamination review for the Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Study Area on July 31, 2025, using the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and Minnesota Department of Agriculture's (MDA) What's in My Neighborhood? (WIMN) Interactive mapping tool. This desktop contamination review is not intended to replace a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) performed by ASTM Standard E1527-21. SRF did not verify the database information for accuracy. Therefore, further environmental review is recommended as needed for specific projects prior to performing any follow-up investigation work (e.g., subsurface borings) to verify WIMN source information. The data from WIMN is not considered sufficient for meeting environmental due diligence requirements. The data is also not considered survey quality and should not be used as the basis for legal decisions. Sites that are located outside of the study area but within the 500 ft buffer zone are indicated within the table with an asterisk. Study Area Sites Table 1 and Table 2 identify potentially contaminated sites found within the study area based on information available from the MPCA and MDA databases, respectively. Figure 1 in the Enclosures shows the 57 MPCA sites and 2 additional MDA sites located within the study area with the adjacent 500 ft buffer area consisting of 21 MPCA sites. There are a variety of site types across this study area including hazardous waste, stormwater, water quality, feedlots investigation and cleanup, solid waste, and tanks. Figure 1 in the Enclosures depicts the locations of these sites. www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 I Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 1763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 288 Mark Noble City of Shakopee Table 1: MPCA Known or Potentially Contaminated Sites 9/26/2025 Page 2 of 5 Site Name ID No. Site Type giti:til Site No. 2008 Airport Improve - Granit Falls C00026334 Stormwater No 6 Ace Auto LLC MNS000307856 Hazardous Waste Yes 28 Allen Advertising MNR000042820; MNRNE3586; MN RN E39JV Multiple Programs Yes 68 Anderson Bus Co MN0000692228 Hazardous Waste Yes 9 Appliance Service MND082520461 Hazardous Waste Yes 73 Arasan Apartments C00059191 Stormwater Yes 64 Autumn Acres C00006117 Stormwater No 27 Basset Cultured Marble & Granite LLC 13900111; MNS000102483 Multiple Programs Yes 55 Bonnevista Terrace Manufactured Home Com MN0051985 Water Quality Yes 53 Cargo Van -Go Inc MNR000067181 Hazardous Waste Yes 2 Chaska Forcemain Phase III* C00005351 Stormwater No 75 Chaska Lime Sludge (PVP180)* VP29380 Investigation and Cleanup Yes 45 Circle K Store 2746246 LS0007887; LS0015811; LS0019058; TS0014398 Multiple Programs Yes 50 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC LS0014168; MND982221194; MNR0533G6; R0533G6; MNR05384X R05384X Multiple Programs Yes 70 Countryside 2nd Addition C00050923; SU B0052855; SUB0053389; SU B0054704; SU B0054706; SU60055154; SU B0055393; SU B0055837; SU B0059314; SU B0060558; SU B0060822; SU B0063215 Stormwater Yes 13 Diemold Tool Inc MND985687144 Hazardous Waste No 46 Ditch Witch Of Minnesota TS0119741 Tanks Yes 39 Ditch Witch of Minnesota Inc — Shakopee MNR000077263 Hazardous Waste Yes 38 Dueco TS0054629 Tanks Yes 48 DUECO — Shakopee C00027546 Stormwater Yes 65 SRF 289 Mark Noble City of Shakopee 9/26/2025 Page 3 of 5 Site Name ID No. Site Type Active Site No. DW Auto/Truck Service LLC* M N R000105510 Hazardous Waste Yes 76 Econo Used Cars MN0000341271 Hazardous Waste Yes 10 Ed Breeggeemann Farm 139-61019 Feedlots Yes 15 Former SuperAmerica #4439 LS0014045; LS0020854; MNR000019281; R000019281; TS0019404 Multiple Programs Yes 22 Garza Motors* MN0000289363 Hazardous Waste Yes 58 Gopher State Truck Stop* MND985712744; SA-gen; VP4510; VP4511 Investigation and Cleanup Yes 67 Hardrives Inc MND981201114 1 14 Hazardous Waste No 5 Highview g hvi ew Park C00066791 Stormwater Yes 41 Indy Specialty* MN0000124636 Hazardous Waste Yes 14 Jackson Elementary School* TS0125309 Tanks Yes 29 Jackson Heights Mobile Home Park* MN0057967 Multiple Programs Yes 37 Jimmys CRC - Shakopee MNR000057026 Hazardous Waste No 57 Johnny's Auto Sales & Repair MNS000205765 Hazardous Waste Yes 4 Kevin Lusignan Co MNS000132449 Hazardous Waste Yes 7 Ladybug Childcare Center* C00046800 Stormwater Yes 31 Lex Motors LLC MNR000052795 R000052795 Hazardous Waste Yes 36 Master Motorworx MNS000115725 Hazardous Waste Yes 49 MN River Valley Industrial Park - Modspa C00027966 Stormwater No 51 MN Ryan Shakopee Site LS0017006; VP23820 Investigation and Cleanup Yes 24 MnDOT Residential Acquisition LS0006551 Investigation and Cleanup Yes 60 MnDOTT Theis Auto SA-gen; VP17830 Investigation and Cleanup Yes 63 Mobile Manor Drive C00046323 Stormwater Yes 42 Mobile Manor Park MN0056197 Water Quality Yes 17 Moms Landscaping & Design LLC MNS000159657 Hazardous Waste Yes 40 New Horizon Academy* C00049744 Stormwater Yes 56 Norbert And Larry Theis* PRE000022 Investigation and Cleanup Yes 71 SRF 290 Mark Noble City of Shakopee 9/26/2025 Page 4 of 5 Site Name ID No. Site Type Active Site N o. OTI Inc Yard Waste and SSOM Facility PBR000957; PBR001401 Solid Waste Yes 44 Park Place Storage Condominiums C00049349 Stormwater Yes 32 Patriot Auto Sales LS0015522 Investigation and Cleanup Yes 30 Pcocs Pero Locos Autobody MNR000067026 R000067026 Hazardous Waste Yes 74 Plehal First Addition* C00055247 Stormwater Yes 25 Powers Second Addition C00056739 Stormwater Yes 21 Quality Heating & Air Services Inc MNS000166058 Hazardous Waste Yes 78 R&R Marine C00052986 Stormwater Yes 77 Randy LaTour Farm 139-60863 Feedlots Yes 18 River Valley Business Park C00064989 Stormwater Yes 35 Roger Plekkenpol Farm 139-104488 Feedlots Yes 43 Ron's Mechanical Inc MNS000162172 Hazardous Waste Yes 72 Scott County Substation C00038127 Stormwater Yes 12 Shakopee Veterinary Clinic MNS000158618 Hazardous Waste Yes 54 Shakopee Vet Clinic C00053451 Stormwater Yes 47 SP 7005-107 (CP T169-03) C00035820 Stormwater No 16 SP 7005-57 (TH 101) Bypass C00003313 Stormwater No 61 SPU West Shakopee Sub C00062539 Stormwater Yes 20 Tbk Auto Body MNR000024489 R000024489 Hazardous Waste Yes 52 TH 169/TH 41/CSAH 78 DDI 147th St. Overpass C00048331 Stormwater Yes 1 TH 169 Crossovers C00048755 Stormwater Yes 8 The Preserve at Stonebrooke* C00004544 Stormwater No 33 Theis Farm Site* MN5000129908 Hazardous Waste Yes 26 Twin City Concrete Pumping Inc* M N 5000199646; PBR001071; T50131128 Multiple Programs Yes 80 Urzua Auto Repair Inc MNS000170456 Hazardous Waste Yes 62 Water Tank 8* C00056856 Stormwater Yes 66 Weidt Property* MNR000055517 Hazardous Waste No 69 West End Lower Bluff Utility Improvements* C00062748 Stormwater Yes 34 SRF 291 Mark Noble City of Shakopee 9/26/2025 Page 5 of 5 Site Name ID No. Site Type Active Site N o. Wheeler Consolidated Inc LS0019945; TS00552005200 Multiple Programs Yes 79 Wheeler Consolidated/Wheeler Lumber MN D985742295; MNR0536VR; M N R0538TY Multiple Programs Yes 23 Windermere South 4th Addition* C00059760 Stormwater Yes 59 Windermere South 5th * C00060905 Stormwater Yes 11 Source: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. What's in My Neighborhood Geospatial Data. 2025. Accessed 8 August 2025 and available at https://www.pca.state.mn.us/about-mpca/whats-in-my-neighborhood. *Denotes sites that are located outside the study area but within the 500 ft buffer zone of the study area. Table 2: MDA Known and Potential Sources of Agricultural Contamination Case File Name Case File No. Investigation Type Contaminant Status UNKNOWN PLK101000540 Emergency Unknown Closed MMCD PLK101063294 Emergency Pesticides Closed The potential for soil contamination from residential, retail, and office/warehouse uses is considered relatively low. To date, storage or handling of hazardous materials or chemicals is not known or anticipated within the study area that could contaminate groundwater. For any structures or uses involving hazardous materials, all applicable federal, state, and local regulations for their handling must be followed. Conclusion Prior to redevelopment in the vicinity of the sites listed in this desktop analysis, it is recommended that a subsurface environmental investigation is completed by a qualified team of environmental professionals (trained, licensed staff of geologists and engineers) to determine if contaminated soil and/or groundwater may be encountered during a project. In some cases, a full Phase II ESA may be needed to evaluate the presence or absence of petroleum products, hazardous substances, or other environmental contaminants in the site's subsurface per the ASTM E1903-11 Standard Guide. Furthermore, a Response Action Plan / Construction Contingency Plan (RAP/CCP) should be in place prior to disturbance sites in order that contaminated materials (if encountered) are managed in accordance with all relevant local, state, and federal regulations. Enclosures • Figure 1 — MPCA/MDA What's in My Neighborhood Sites SRF 292 CO CN a a3 co 0 N Cr) a Gifford Lake Louisville Legend Q Study Area 1500ft Buffer Railroad DNR Public Water DNR Public Watercourse L T) Municipal Boundary Ell ll County Boundary What's in My Neighborhood Sites - MPCA Feedlots El Hazardous Waste Investigation and Cleanup Multiple Programs Solid Waste Stormwater Tanks Water Quality What's in My Neighborhood Sites - MDA APesticides AUnknown MPCA What's in my Neighborhood Avenue Shakopee 10th Avenue West V ierling A 130th * Stree Wes Jackson mage Source: Carver County 2024, Scott County 2024 Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update City of Shakopee Figure 1 293 Appendix F IPaC and DNR Information • Minnesota -Wisconsin Federal Endangered Species Determination Key • Whooping Crane and Monarch Butterfly Determination Key • Northern Long Eared Bat and Tri-Colored Bat Determination Key • Rusty Patch Bumble Bee Determination Key • DNR Natural Heritage Review Jackson Township Development Area — AUAR Update IRF 294 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Minnesota -Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office 3815 American Blvd East Bloomington, MN 55425-1659 Phone: (952) 858-0793 In Reply Refer To: Project Code: 2025-0133323 Project Name: Jackson Township Development Area - AUAR Update 08/08/2025 16:26:07 UTC Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: This response has been generated by the Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPaC) system to provide information on natural resources that could be affected by your project. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) provides this response under the authority of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543), the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668-668d), the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703-712), and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.). Threatened and Endangered Species The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirement for obtaining a Technical Assistance Letter from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. Consultation Technical Assistance Please refer to refer to our Section 7 website for guidance and technical assistance, including step-by-step instructions for making effects determinations for each species that might be present and for specific guidance on the following types of projects: projects in developed areas, HUD, CDBG, EDA, USDA Rural Development projects, pipelines, buried utilities, telecommunications, and requests for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from FEMA. 295 Project code: 2025-0133323 08/08/2025 16:26:07 UTC We recommend running the project (if it qualifies) through our Minnesota -Wisconsin Federal Endangered Species Determination Key (Minnesota -Wisconsin ("D -key")). A demonstration video showing how-to access and use the determination key is available. Please note that the Minnesota -Wisconsin D -key is the third option of 3 available d -keys. D -keys are tools to help Federal agencies and other project proponents determine if their proposed action has the potential to adversely affect federally listed species and designated critical habitat. The Minnesota -Wisconsin D -key includes a structured set of questions that assists a project proponent in determining whether a proposed project qualifies for a certain predetermined consultation outcome for all federally listed species found in Minnesota and Wisconsin (except for the northern long-eared bat- see below), which includes determinations of "no effect" or "may affect, not likely to adversely affect." In each case, the Service has compiled and analyzed the best available information on the species' biology and the impacts of certain activities to support these determinations. If your completed d -key output letter shows a "No Effect" (NE) determination for all listed species, print your IPaC output letter for your files to document your compliance with the Endangered Species Act. For Federal projects with a "Not Likely to Adversely Affect" (NLAA) determination, our concurrence becomes valid if you do not hear otherwise from us after a 30 -day review period, as indicated in your letter. If your d -key output letter indicates additional coordination with the Minnesota -Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office is necessary (i.e., you get a "May Affect" determination), you will be provided additional guidance on contacting the Service to continue ESA coordination outside of the key; ESA compliance cannot be concluded using the key for "May Affect" determinations unless otherwise indicated in your output letter. Note: Once you obtain your official species list, you are not required to continue in IPaC with d -keys, although in most cases these tools should expedite your review. If you choose to make an effects determination on your own, you may do so. If the project is a Federal Action, you may want to review our section 7 step-by-step instructions before making your determinations. Using the IPaC Official Species List to Make No Effect and May Affect Determinations for Listed Species 1. If IPaC returns a result of "There are no listed species found within the vicinity of the project," then project proponents can conclude the proposed activities will have no effect on any federally listed species under Service jurisdiction. Concurrence from the Service is not required for no effect determinations. No further consultation or coordination is required. Attach this letter to the dated IPaC species list report for your records. 2. If IPaC returns one or more federally listed, proposed, or candidate species as potentially present in the action area of the proposed project — other than bats (see below) — then project proponents must determine if proposed activities will have no effect on or may affect those species. For assistance in determining if suitable habitat for listed, candidate, or proposed species occurs within your project area or if species may be affected by project activities, you can obtain Life History Information for Listed and Candidate Species on our office website. If no impacts will occur to a species on the IPaC species list (e.g., there is no habitat present in the project area), the appropriate determination is no effect. No further consultation or coordination is required. Attach this letter to the dated IPaC species list report for your records. 2 of 17 296 Project code: 2025-0133323 08/08/2025 16:26:07 UTC 3. Should you determine that project activities may affect any federally listed, please contact our office for further coordination. Letters with requests for consultation or correspondence about your project should include the Consultation Tracking Number in the header. Electronic submission is preferred. Northern Long -Eared Bats Northern long-eared bats occur throughout Minnesota and Wisconsin and the information below may help in determining if your project may affect these species. Suitable summer habitat for northern long-eared bats consists of a wide variety of forested/wooded habitats where they roost, forage, and travel and may also include some adjacent and interspersed non -forested habitats such as emergent wetlands and adjacent edges of agricultural fields, old fields and pastures. This includes forests and woodlots containing potential roosts (i.e., live trees and/or snags ≥3 inches dbh for northern long- eared bat that have exfoliating bark, cracks, crevices, and/or hollows), as well as linear features such as fencerows, riparian forests, and other wooded corridors. These wooded areas may be dense or loose aggregates of trees with variable amounts of canopy closure. Individual trees may be considered suitable habitat when they exhibit the characteristics of a potential roost tree and are located within 1,000 feet (305 meters) of forested/wooded habitat. Northern long-eared bats have also been observed roosting in human -made structures, such as buildings, barns, bridges, and bat houses; therefore, these structures should also be considered potential summer habitat and evaluated for use by bats. If your project will impact caves or mines or will involve clearing forest or woodland habitat containing suitable roosting habitat, northern long-eared bats could be affected. For bat activity dates, please review Appendix L in the Range -wide Indiana Bat and Northern Long - Eared Bat Survey Guidelines. Examples of unsuitable habitat include: ■ Individual trees that are greater than 1,000 feet from forested or wooded areas, ■ Trees found in highly developed urban areas (e.g., street trees, downtown areas), ■ A pure stand of less than 3 -inch dbh trees that are not mixed with larger trees, and ■ A monoculture stand of shrubby vegetation with no potential roost trees. If IPaC returns a result that northern long-eared bats are potentially present in the action area of the proposed project, project proponents can conclude the proposed activities may affect this species IF one or more of the following activities are proposed: ■ Clearing or disturbing suitable roosting habitat, as defined above, at any time of year, ■ Any activity in or near the entrance to a cave or mine, ■ Mining, deep excavation, or underground work within 0.25 miles of a cave or mine, ■ Construction of one or more wind turbines, or ■ Demolition or reconstruction of human -made structures that are known to be used by bats based on observations of roosting bats, bats emerging at dusk, or guano deposits or stains. If none of the above activities are proposed, project proponents can conclude the proposed activities will have no effect on the northern long-eared bat. Concurrence from the Service is not required for No Effect determinations. No further consultation or coordination is required. Attach this letter to the dated IPaC 3 of 17 297 Project code: 2025-0133323 08/08/2025 16:26:07 UTC species list report for your records. If any of the above activities are proposed, and the northern long-eared bat appears on the user's species list, the federal project user will be directed to either the northern long-eared bat and tricolored bat range -wide D - key or the Federal Highways Administration, Federal Railways Administration, and Federal Transit Administration Indiana bat/Northern long-eared bat D -key, depending on the type of project and federal agency involvement. Similar to the Minnesota -Wisconsin D -key, these d -keys helps to determine if prohibited take might occur and, if not, will generate an automated verification letter. Additional information about available tools can be found on the Service's northern long-eared bat website. Whooping Crane Whooping crane is designated as a non -essential experimental population in Wisconsin and consultation under Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act is only required if project activities will occur within a National Wildlife Refuge or National Park. If project activities are proposed on lands outside of a National Wildlife Refuge or National Park, then you are not required to consult. For additional information on this designation and consultation requirements, please review "Establishment of a Nonessential Experimental Population of Whooping Cranes in the Eastern United States." Other Trust Resources and Activities Bald and Golden Eagles - Although the bald eagle has been removed from the endangered species list, this species and the golden eagle are protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to survey the area for any migratory bird nests. If there is an eagle nest on -site while work is on -going, eagles may be disturbed. We recommend avoiding and minimizing disturbance to eagles whenever practicable. If you cannot avoid eagle disturbance, you may seek a permit. A nest take permit is always required for removal, relocation, or obstruction of an eagle nest. For communication and wind energy projects, please refer to additional guidelines below. Migratory Birds - The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibits the taking, killing, possession, transportation, and importation of migratory birds, their eggs, parts, and nests, except when specifically authorized by the Service. The Service has the responsibility under the MBTA to proactively prevent the mortality of migratory birds whenever possible and we encourage implementation of recommendations that minimize potential impacts to migratory birds. Such measures include clearing forested habitat outside the nesting season (generally March 1 to August 31) or conducting nest surveys prior to clearing to avoid injury to eggs or nestlings. Communication Towers - Construction of new communications towers (including radio, television, cellular, and microwave) creates a potentially significant impact on migratory birds, especially some 350 species of night -migrating birds. However, the Service has developed voluntary guidelines for minimizing impacts. Transmission Lines - Migratory birds, especially large species with long wingspans, heavy bodies, and poor maneuverability can also collide with power lines. In addition, mortality can occur when birds, particularly hawks, eagles, kites, falcons, and owls, attempt to perch on uninsulated or unguarded power poles. To minimize these risks, please refer to guidelines developed by the Avian Power Line Interaction Committee and the Service. Implementation of these measures is especially important along sections of lines adjacent to wetlands or other areas that support large numbers of raptors and migratory birds. 4 of 17 298 Project code: 2025-0133323 08/08/2025 16:26:07 UTC Wind Energy - To minimize impacts to migratory birds and bats, wind energy projects should follow the Service's Wind Energy Guidelines. In addition, please refer to the Service's Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance, which provides guidance for conserving bald and golden eagles in the course of siting, constructing, and operating wind energy facilities. State Department of Natural Resources Coordination While it is not required for your Federal section 7 consultation, please note that additional state endangered or threatened species may also have the potential to be impacted. Please contact the Minnesota or Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources for information on state listed species that may be present in your proposed project area. Minnesota Minnesota Department of Natural Resources - Endangered Resources Review Homepage Email: Review.NHIS@state.mn.us Wisconsin Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources - Endangered Resources Review Homepage Email: DNRERReview@wi.gov We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species Please feel free to contact our office with questions or for additional information. Attachment(s): ■ Official Species List ■ Bald & Golden Eagles ■ Migratory Birds OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action". This species list is provided by: Minnesota -Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office 3815 American Blvd East Bloomington, MN 55425-1659 (952) 858-0793 5 of 17 299 Project code: 2025-0133323 08/08/2025 16:26:07 UTC PROJECT SUMMARY Project Code: Project Name: Project Type: Project Description: 2025-0133323 Jackson Township Development Area - AUAR Update Residential Construction The Shakopee AUAR was originally prepared to provide a complete understanding of the cumulative impacts of planned development in seven growth areas that are either currently part of the City of Shakopee or are planned to be in the future as part of the City's orderly annexation agreement with Jackson Township. The AUAR Study area is divided into seven Subdistricts, A through G, that correspond with the areas defined in the orderly annexation agreement and an area of Shakopee poised for new growth. They are contiguous and are generally located to the southwest of current Shakopee city boundaries. Two development scenarios were included with the original AUAR, in compliance with the AUAR process. This included the No Build (Shakopee 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Scott County 2030 Comprehensive Plan) Scenario and the Build (Shakopee 2040 Plan) Scenario. Project Location: The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/@44.7731483,-93.56009769512806,14z Counties: Scott County, Minnesota 6 of 17 300 Project code: 2025-0133323 08/08/2025 16:26:07 UTC ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. 1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. 7 of 17 301 Project code: 2025-0133323 08/08/2025 16:26:07 UTC MAMMALS NAME STATUS Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045 Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515 BIRDS NAME Whooping Crane Grus americana Population: U.S.A. (AL, AR, CO, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, MI, MN, MS, MO, NC, NM, OH, SC, TN, UT, VA, WI, WV, western half of WY) No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/758 INSECTS NAME Endangered Proposed Endangered STATUS Experimental Population, Non - Essential Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743 Rusty Patched Bumble Bee Bombus affinis finis There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location overlaps the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9383 General project design guidelines: https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/project/S6V765SBNJD6RJHXLV3OWLIXWA/documents/ generated/9225.pdf Western Regal Fritillary Argynnis idalia occidentalis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/12017 STATUS Proposed Threatened Endangered Proposed Threatened CRITICAL HABITATS There is 1 critical habitat wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. NAME STATUS Rusty Patched Bumble Bee Bombus affinis finis Proposed https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9383#crithab 8 of 17 302 Project code: 2025-0133323 08/08/2025 16:26:07 UTC BALD & GOLDEN EAGLES Bald and Golden Eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act 2 and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) 1. Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to Bald or Golden Eagles, or their habitats, should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate avoidance and minimization measures, as described in the various links on this page. 1. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. 2. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. 3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a) There are Bald Eagles and/or Golden Eagles in your project area. Measures for Proactively Minimizing Eagle Impacts For information on how to best avoid and minimize disturbance to nesting bald eagles, please review the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. You may employ the timing and activity -specific distance recommendations in this document when designing your project/ activity to avoid and minimize eagle impacts. For bald eagle information specific to Alaska, please refer to Bald Eagle Nesting and Sensitivity to Human Activity. The FWS does not currently have guidelines for avoiding and minimizing disturbance to nesting Golden Eagles. For site -specific recommendations regarding nesting Golden Eagles, please consult with the appropriate Regional Migratory Bird Office or Ecological Services Field Office. If disturbance or take of eagles cannot be avoided, an incidental take permit may be available to authorize any take that results from, but is not the purpose of, an otherwise lawful activity. For assistance making this determination for Bald Eagles, visit the Do I Need A Permit Tool. For assistance making this determination for golden eagles, please consult with the appropriate Regional Migratory Bird Office or Ecological Services Field Office. Ensure Your Eagle List is Accurate and Complete If your project area is in a poorly surveyed area in IPaC, your list may not be complete and you may need to rely on other resources to determine what species may be present (e.g. your local FWS field office, state surveys, your own surveys). Please review the Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles, to help you properly interpret the report for your specified location, including determining if there is sufficient data to ensure your list is accurate. For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to bald or golden eagles on your list, see the "Probability of Presence Summary" below to see when these bald or golden eagles are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. 9 of 17 303 Project code: 2025-0133323 08/08/2025 16:26:07 UTC NAME BREEDING SEASON Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626 PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY Breeds Dec 1 to Aug 31 The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence (-) Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during that week of the year. Breeding Season ( ) Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. Survey Effort ( ) Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. No Data ( ) A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Bald Eagle liiiliii III liii liiiliii liii Ha 11" 11'+'11+ III Non -BCC Vulnerable Additional information can be found using the following links: • Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management • Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/ collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds 10 of 17 304 Project code: 2025-0133323 08/08/2025 16:26:07 UTC • Nationwide avoidance and minimization measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/ def ault/f Iles/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf • Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/ media/supplemental-inf ormation-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur- proj ect-action MIGRATORY BIRDS The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) 1 prohibits the take (including killing, capturing, selling, trading, and transport) of protected migratory bird species without prior authorization by the Department of Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service). 1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. 3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a) For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the "Probability of Presence Summary" below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. NAME American Golden -plover Pluvialis dominica This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10561 Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus BREEDING SEASON Breeds elsewhere Breeds Dec 1 to This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Aug 31 because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. https://ecos.fws. gov/ecp/species/1626 Black Tern Chlidonias niger surinamenisis This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3093 Black -billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9399 Breeds May 15 to Aug 20 Breeds May 15 to Oct 10 11 of 17 305 Project code: 2025-0133323 08/08/2025 16:26:07 UTC NAME Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9454 Canada Warbler Cardellina canadensis This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9643 Cerulean Warbler Setophaga cerulea This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974 Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9406 Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10678 Golden -winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8745 in the continental USA in the continental USA in the continental USA in the continental USA in the continental USA in the continental USA Grasshopper Sparrow Ammodramus savannarum perpallidus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8329 Henslow's Sparrow Centronyx henslowii This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3941 Le Conte's Sparrow Ammospiza leconteii This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9469 Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679 in the continental USA in the continental USA in the continental USA BREEDING SEASON Breeds May 20 to Jul 31 Breeds May 20 to Aug 10 Breeds Apr 22 to Jul 20 Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25 Breeds May 1 to Aug 20 Breeds May 1 to Jul 20 Breeds Jun 1 to Aug 20 Breeds May 1 toAug 31 Breeds Jun 1 to Aug 15 Breeds elsewhere 12 of 17 306 Project code: 2025-0133323 08/08/2025 16:26:07 UTC NAME Long-eared Owl asio otus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3631 Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9481 Pectoral Sandpiper Calidris melanotos This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9561 Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9398 in the continental USA in the continental USA in the continental USA in the continental USA Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9478 Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris pusilla This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9603 Short -billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9480 Upland Sandpiper Bartramia longicauda This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9294 Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9431 PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY BREEDING SEASON Breeds Mar 1 to Jul 15 Breeds May 1 to Jul 31 Breeds elsewhere Breeds May 10 to Sep 10 Breeds elsewhere Breeds elsewhere Breeds elsewhere Breeds May 1 toAug 31 Breeds May 10 toAug 31 The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental 13 of 17 307 Project code: 2025-0133323 08/08/2025 16:26:07 UTC Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence ( ) Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during that week of the year. Breeding Season ( ) Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. Survey Effort ( ) Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. No Data ( ) A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC American Golden - plover BCC Rangewide (CON) Bald Eagle Non -BCC Vulnerable Black Tern BCC Rangewide (CON) Black -billed Cuckoo BCC Rangewide (CON) Bobolink BCC Rangewide (CON) Canada Warbler BCC Rangewide (CON) Cerulean Warbler BCC Rangewide (CON) +++-i ++++ i-++++++I ++++ +++ +++i ++iii+++i+++++++ F+++ IIIliIIIIIII����� +++ f+++ ++++ I ui ■ �u �u I I ■ III+ Hu +AI H 14++ IIII ++++ ++++ Im.11-- ---- ---- == ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++++++++++++++++*1!!!!.I IIII 40+ 4-4+ ++++ ill ++++++++ ++++ immmi -+++ +—+ ++ Ii -III III + ++++ + Mi 14 of 17 308 Project code: 2025-0133323 08/08/2025 16:26:07 UTC Chimney Swift BCC Rangewide (CON) Eastern Whip -poor - will BCC Rangewide (CON) Golden -winged Warbler BCC Rangewide (CON) Grasshopper Sparrow BCC - BCR Henslow's Sparrow BCC Rangewide (CON) +++++++++++ii L+++11 I E+ i I I++I 'HI +++0 III 7 �F ++++ ++++ ++++ -4++ ±+±±÷++÷±++++++++•*+ +++I +if+ -4++ ++-Fo +-Fig!) 10++ ++++ ++++ ++++ I I +1 II 1111 IIIIim 000m IIII illl IIII SPECIES JAN Le Conte's Sparrow BCC Rangewide (CON) Lesser Yellowlegs BCC Rangewide (CON) Long-eared Owl BCC Rangewide (CON) Marbled Godwit BCC Rangewide (CON) Pectoral Sandpiper BCC Rangewide (CON) Red-headed Woodpecker BCC Rangewide (CON) Rusty Blackbird BCC - BCR Semipalmated Sandpiper BCC - BCR Short -billed Dowitcher BCC Rangewide (CON) FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL ++++ -++- -+++ ++++ ++++ I III III I I III IN++ ++++ ÷±+÷ ++++ I I f -4++ ++++ ÷±+÷ ++++ III } }++-I III AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC IIII II + +++- ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++11111 *+++ -4++ -4++ 41+ ++++ ÷+++ ++++ ++++ ++++ I I I 11 I I I I IIII +-FE+ ++++ +++4 I -FE+ +Iii I I iii 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-i++++++ ++++ I++ I II I ++++ ++++ +++-I ++++ I +*-E FH I I ++++ +++I -+++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++ I ++*+ -4++ +++-I 4++ ++++ 111+ ++++ ++1+ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++ I 4++ ++++ -4++ II++ ++++ ++++ ÷+++ ++++ IIII Upland Sandpiper ++++ +++ 1-+++ +++-I-+ -I-+++ I I I I I I I I I-+++ ++++ ++++ +-++ BCC - BCR 15 of 17 309 Project code: 2025-0133323 08/08/2025 16:26:07 UTC Wood Thrush BCC Rangewide (CON) ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ Mk I III+ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ MME Additional information can be found using the following links: ■ Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management ■ Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/ collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds ■ Nationwide avoidance and minimization measures for birds ■ Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/ media/supplemental-inf ormation-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur- proj ect-action 16 of 17 310 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Minnesota -Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office 3815 American Blvd East Bloomington, MN 55425-1659 Phone: (952) 858-0793 In Reply Refer To: Project code: 2025-0133323 Project Name: Jackson Township Development Area - AUAR Update 08/12/2025 13:36:24 UTC Subject: Technical Assistance letter for 'Jackson Township Development Area - AUAR Update' for specified threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location consistent with the Minnesota -Wisconsin Endangered Species Determination Key (Minnesota -Wisconsin DKey). Dear Alex Gaber: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) received on August 12, 2025 your effect determination(s) for the 'Jackson Township Development Area - AUAR Update' (Action) using the Minnesota -Wisconsin DKey within the Service's Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) system. The Service developed this system in accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C 1531 et seq.). Based on your responses to the Service's Minnesota -Wisconsin DKey, you made the following effect determination(s) for the proposed Action: Species Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus) Whooping Crane (Grus americana) Listing Status Determination Proposed No effect Threatened Experimental No effect Population, Non - Essential Determination Information Thank you for informing the Service of your "No Effect" determination(s). No further coordination is necessary for the species you determined will not be affected by the Action. Additional Information Sufficient project details: Please provide sufficient project details on your project homepage in IPaC (Define Project, Project Description) to support your conclusions. Failure to disclose important aspects of your project that would influence the outcome of your effects determinations may negate your determinations and invalidate this letter. If you have site -specific information that leads you to believe a different determination is more appropriate for your 311 Project code: 2025-0133323 IPaC Record Locator: 257-167857630 08/12/2025 13:36:24 UTC project than what the Dkey concludes, you can and should proceed based on the best available information. Future project changes: The Service recommends that you contact the Minnesota -Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office or re-evaluate the project in IPaC if: 1) the scope or location of the proposed Action is changed; 2) new information reveals that the action may affect federally listed species or federally designated critical habitat in a manner or to an extent not previously considered; 3) the Action is modified in a manner that causes effects to listed species or designated critical habitat; or 4) a new species is listed or critical habitat designated. If any of the above conditions occurs, additional consultation with the Service should take place before project changes are final or resources committed. For non -Federal representatives: Please note that when a project requires consultation under section 7 of the Act, the Service must consult directly with the Federal action agency unless that agency formally designates a non -Federal representative (50 CFR 402.08). Non -Federal representatives may prepare analyses or conduct informal consultations; however, the ultimate responsibility for section 7 compliance under the Act remains with the Federal agency. Please include the Federal action agency in additional correspondence regarding this project. For projects that intersect with or are adjacent to Tribal lands: The Service has federal Trust responsibilities and a strong commitment to working with Tribal governments to help sustain fish and wildlife resources for future generations. Tribal governments should be provided with sufficient opportunity to express their perspectives and/or concerns for proposed projects. If your project intersects with Tribal lands or impacts culturally sensitive resources, please engage with the federally recognized Tribe to ensure they have an opportunity to provide input on this project. Species -specific information Bald and Golden Eagles: Bald eagles, golden eagles, and their nests are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (54 Stat. 250, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 668a -d) (Eagle Act). The Eagle Act prohibits, except when authorized by an Eagle Act permit, the "taking" of bald and golden eagles and defines "take" as "pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, molest or disturb." The Eagle Act's implementing regulations define disturb as "... to agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle to a degree that causes, or is likely to cause, based on the best scientific information available, (1) injury to an eagle, (2) a decrease in its productivity, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior, or (3) nest abandonment, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior." Additional Species Requiring Review In addition to the species described above, the following species or critical habitats may also occur in your project area and are not covered by this conclusion: ■ Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Endangered ■ Rusty Patched Bumble Bee Bombus affinis finis Endangered ■ Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus Proposed Endangered ■ Western Regal Fritillary Argynnis idalia occidentalis Proposed Threatened DKey Version Publish Date: 08/11/2025 2 of 8 312 Project code: 2025-0133323 IPaC Record Locator: 257-167857630 08/12/2025 13:36:24 UTC Coordination with the Service is not complete if additional coordination is advised above for any species. DKey Version Publish Date: 08/11/2025 3 of 8 313 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Minnesota -Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office 3815 American Blvd East Bloomington, MN 55425-1659 Phone: (952) 858-0793 In Reply Refer To: Project code: 2025-0133323 Project Name: Jackson Township Development Area - AUAR Update Federal Nexus: no Federal Action Agency (if applicable): 08/08/2025 17:09:05 UTC Subject: Technical assistance for 'Jackson Township Development Area - AUAR Update' Dear Alex Gaber: This letter records your determination using the Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) system provided to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on August 08, 2025, for 'Jackson Township Development Area - AUAR Update' (here forward, Project). This project has been assigned Project Code 2025-0133323 and all future correspondence should clearly reference this number. Please carefully review this letter. Your Endangered Species Act (Act) requirements are not complete. Ensuring Accurate Determinations When Using IPaC The Service developed the IPaC system and associated species' determination keys in accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA; 87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and based on a standing analysis. All information submitted by the Project proponent into IPaC must accurately represent the full scope and details of the Project. Failure to accurately represent or implement the Project as detailed in IPaC or the Northern Long-eared Bat and Tricolored Bat Range -wide Determination Key (Dkey), invalidates this letter. Determination for the Northern Long -Eared Bat and Tricolored Bat Based on your IPaC submission and a standing analysis completed by the Service, you determined the proposed Project will have the following effect determinations: Species Listing Status Determination Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) Endangered May affect Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis sub ffavus) Proposed May affect Endangered 314 Project code: 2025-0133323 IPaC Record Locator: 257-166749656 08/08/2025 17:09:05 UTC Other Species and Critical Habitat that May be Present in the Action Area The IPaC-assisted determination key for the northern long-eared bat and tricolored bat does not apply to the following ESA -protected species and/or critical habitat that also may occur in your Action area: • Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Proposed Threatened • Rusty Patched Bumble Bee Bombus affinis Endangered • Western Regal Fritillary Argynnis idalia occidentalis Proposed Threatened • Whooping Crane Grus americana Experimental Population, Non -Essential Critical Habitats: • Rusty Patched Bumble Bee Bombus affinis Endangered You may coordinate with our Office to determine whether the Action may cause prohibited take of the species listed above. Conclusion Further coordination with the Service is voluntary for those species with a determination of "May Affect." A "May Affect" determination in this key indicates that the project, as entered, is not consistent with the questions in the key. Not all projects that reach a "May Affect" determination are anticipated to result in adverse impacts to listed species. Through the technical assistance process, the Service might be able to provide information that either indicates incidental take is not reasonably certain to occur, or the Service might be able to provide recommendations that enable the project to be conducted in a way that avoids the likelihood of incidentally taking listed bats. Please contact our Minnesota -Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office for more information. The Service has developed interim voluntary guidance for non- federal actions involving forest habitat modification that may affect the northern long-eared bat. Review the guidance posted here for more information for NLEB: https://www.fws.gov/species/ northern-long-eared-bat-myotis-septentrionalis and TCB: https://www.fws.gov/species/ tricolored-bat-perimyotis-subflavus Federal agencies must consult with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) when an action may affect a listed species. Tricolored bat is proposed for listing as endangered under the ESA, but not yet listed. For actions that may affect a proposed species, agencies cannot consult, but they can confer under the authority of section 7(a) (4) of the ESA. Such conferences can follow the procedures for a consultation and be adopted as such if and when the proposed species is listed. Should the tricolored bat be listed, agencies must review projects that are not yet complete, or projects with ongoing effects within the tricolored bat range that previously received a NE or NLAA determination from the key to confirm that the determination is still accurate. Projects that receive a may affect determination for tricolored bat through the key, should contact the appropriate Ecological Services Field Office if they want to conference on this species. DKey Version Publish Date: 08/05/2025 2 of 11 315 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Minnesota -Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office 3815 American Blvd East Bloomington, MN 55425-1659 Phone: (952) 858-0793 In Reply Refer To: Project code: 2025-0133323 Project Name: Jackson Township Development Area - AUAR Update Federal Nexus: no Federal Action Agency (if applicable): 08/08/2025 17:12:11 UTC Subject: Technical Assistance letter for 'Jackson Township Development Area - AUAR Update' for rusty patched bumble bee that may occur in your proposed project location consistent with the Rusty Patched Bumble Bee Range Wide Determination Key (RPBB DKey). Dear Alex Gaber: This letter records your determination using the RPBB DKey within the Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) system provided to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) on August 08, 2025, for 'Jackson Township Development Area - AUAR Update' (here forward, Project). This project has been assigned Project Code `2025-0133323' and all future correspondence should clearly reference this number. Please carefully review this letter. Your Endangered Species Act (Act) requirements are not complete. Ensuring Accurate Determinations When Using IPaC Determination Keys The USFWS developed the IPaC system and associated species' determination keys in accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA; 87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). All information submitted by the Project proponent into the IPaC must accurately represent the full scope and details of the Project. Failure to accurately represent or implement the Project as detailed in IPaC or the RPBB DKey, invalidates this letter. Determination for the Rusty Patched Bumble Bee Based on your answers and the assistance of the USFWS' RPBB DKey, you made the following effect determination for the proposed Action: Species Listing Status Determination Rusty Patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis) finis) Endangered May affect 316 Project code: 2025-0133323 'PaC Record Locator: 257-166749828 08/08/2025 17:12:11 UTC Consultation with the USFWS is not complete. Your agency's ESA section 7 consultation requirement for rusty patched bumble bee with the USFWS is not complete, and further consultation with the USFWS is required. Review the Rusty Patched Bumble Bee technical assistance for Surveyors and Researchers and obtain an Endangered Species Act permit, if recommended by the technical assistance. Contact the local USFWS Ecological Services Field Office as needed. Other Species and Critical Habitat that May be Present in the Action Area The IPaC-assisted determination key for the rusty patched bumble bee does not apply to the following ESA -protected species and/or critical habitat that also may occur in your Action area: • Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Proposed Threatened • Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Endangered • Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus Proposed Endangered • Western Regal Fritillary Argynnis idalia occidentalis Proposed Threatened • Whooping Crane Grus americana Experimental Population, Non -Essential Critical Habitats: • Rusty Patched Bumble Bee Bombus affinis Endangered Coordination with the USFWS is advised for any species and/or critical habitat listed above. You should coordinate with our Office to determine whether the Action may affect the species and/or critical habitat listed above and if further consultation is required. Note that reinitiation of consultation would be necessary if a new species is listed or critical habitat designated that may be affected by the identified action before it is complete. If you have any questions regarding this letter or need further assistance, please contact the local Ecological Services Field Office and reference Project Code `2025-0133323' associated with this Project. See the top of this letter for the Project Code. Additional Information Sufficient project details: Please provide sufficient project details on your project homepage in IPaC (Define Project, Project Description) to support your conclusions. Failure to disclose important aspects of your project that would influence the outcome of your effects determinations may negate your determinations and invalidate this letter. If you have site -specific information that leads you to believe a different determination is more appropriate for your project than what the Dkey concludes, you can and should proceed based on the best available information. Future project changes: The Service recommends that you contact the local Ecological Services Field Office or re-evaluate the project in IPaC if: 1) the scope or location of the proposed Action is changed; 2) new information reveals that the action may affect rusty patched bumble bee in a manner or to an extent not previously considered; 3) the Action is modified in a manner that DKey Version Publish Date: 07/18/2025 2 of 6 317 Project code: 2025-0133323 1 PaC Record Locator: 257-166749828 08/08/2025 17:12:11 UTC causes effects to rusty patched bumble bee; or 4) or critical habitat is designated. If any of the above conditions occur, additional consultation with the Service should take place before project changes are final or resources are committed. Species -specific information Bald and Golden Eagles: Bald eagles, golden eagles, and their nests are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (54 Stat. 250, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 668a -d) (Eagle Act). The Eagle Act prohibits, except when authorized by an Eagle Act permit, the "taking" of bald and golden eagles and defines "take" as "pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, molest or disturb." The Eagle Act's implementing regulations define disturb as "... to agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle to a degree that causes, or is likely to cause, based on the best scientific information available, (1) injury to an eagle, (2) a decrease in its productivity, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior, or (3) nest abandonment, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior." If you observe a bald eagle nest in the vicinity of your proposed project, you should follow the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (May 2007). For more information on eagles and conducting activities in the vicinity of an eagle nest, please visit our regional eagle website or contact the local Ecological Services Field Office. If the Action may affect bald or golden eagles, additional coordination with the Service under the Eagle Act may be required. DKey Version Publish Date: 07/18/2025 3 of 6 318 Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update (SRF Project #19234) MCE-2O25-OO646 Page 1 of 6 wok DEPARTMENT OF Ili NATURAL RESOURCES Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Ecological & Water Resources 500 Lafayette Road, Box 25 St. Paul, MN 55155-4025 September 18, 2025 Alex Gaber SRF Consulting Group, Inc. RE: Natural Heritage Review of the proposed Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update (SRF Project #19234), T115N R23W Sections 2-3, 9-11, 13-16, and 22-24; Scott County Dear Alex Gaber, For all correspondence regarding the Natural Heritage Review of this project please include the project ID MCE- 2025-00646 in the email subject line. As requested, the Minnesota Natural Heritage Information System has been reviewed to determine if the proposed project has the potential to impact any rare species or other significant natural features. Based on the project details provided with the request, the following rare features may be impacted by the proposed project: Ecologically Significant Areas • A calcareous fen (Seminary Fen, Fen ID No. 20977) with state -listed threatened plant species has been documented in the vicinity of the proposed project. A calcareous fen is a rare and distinctive peat - accumulating wetland that is legally protected in Minnesota. The Wetlands Conservation Act (WCA), authorized by Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.223, states that calcareous fens may not be filled, drained, or otherwise degraded, wholly or partially, by any activity, except as provided for in a management plan approved by the commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources. Many of the unique characteristics of calcareous fens result from the upwelling of groundwater through calcareous substrates. Because of this dependence on groundwater hydrology, calcareous fens can be affected by nearby activities or even those several miles away. For more information regarding calcareous fens, please see the Calcareous Fen Fact Sheet. To minimize stormwater impacts, please refer to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's General Principles for Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. Please note that calcareous fens are "Special Waters" and a buffer zone may be required. Calcareous fens may be impacted by activities within the fen, activities that affect surface water flows (e.g., stormwater flow, erosion), or activities that affect groundwater hydrology (e.g., groundwater pumping, contamination, discharge, or excavation). The DNR would have concerns regarding any activities that might affect groundwater flows, including groundwater pumping or discharge. 319 Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update (SRF Project #19234) MCE-2O25-OO646 Page 2 of 6 To ensure compliance under WCA, please contact the Calcareous Fen Program Coordinator, Keylor Andrews (Kevlor.Andrews@state.mn.us). If it is determined that the project will adversely affect the fens in any way, including indirect impacts through the alteration of hydrological conditions, you will need to contact EMAIL before the project is initiated to discuss rare species survey process (see below in State -listed Species). • The Minnesota Biological Survey (MBS) has a Site of Biodiversity Significance (MBS Sites) within the project boundary. MBS Sites have varying levels of native biodiversity and are ranked based on the relative significance of this biodiversity at a statewide level. Factors taken into account during the ranking process include the number of rare species documented within the site, the quality of the native plant communities in the site, the size of the site, and the context of the site within the landscape. o Nyssen's Lake— Moderate MBS Site — Sites ranked as Moderate contain occurrences of rare species and/or moderately disturbed native plant communities, and/or landscapes that have a strong potential for recovery. o Gifford Lake Unit and Jackson 10— Below — These areas were determined to be Below the minimum biodiversity threshold for statewide significance. These areas may have conservation value at the local level as habitat for native plants and animals, corridors for animal movements, buffers surrounding higher quality natural areas, or as areas with high potential for restoration of native habitat. Several DNR Native Plant Communities (NPC) are within the vicinity of the proposed project. NPCs are given a rank that reflects the relative rarity and endangerment of the community type in Minnesota. Ranks range from critically imperiled (S1) to secure, common, widespread, and abundant (S5). NPCs with a rank of S1, S2, or S3 are considered rare within Minnesota. As currently proposed, the following DNR Native Plant Communities have been delineated in the direct vicinity of the proposed project: o MRn93b: Spikerush - Bur Reed Marsh (Northern) — imperiled (S2) o FFs59a: Silver Maple - Green Ash - Cottonwood Terrace Forest — vulnerable to extirpation (S3) o MHs38c: Red Oak - Sugar Maple - Basswood - (Bitternut Hickory) Forest — vulnerable to extirpation (S3) o MRn93a: Bulrush Marsh (Northern) — vulnerable to extirpation (S3) o WMn82b: Sedge Meadow — uncommon but not rare (S4) o WMn82a: Willow - Dogwood Shrub Swamp — secure and abundant (S5) The DNR recommends that the project be designed to avoid impacts to these ecologically significant areas. Actions to avoid or minimize disturbance include, but are not limited to, the following recommendations: o As much as possible, operate within already -disturbed areas. o Avoid MBS Sites and rare NPCs (ranked S1, S2, or S3). o Retain a buffer between proposed activities and the MBS Site. o Minimize vehicular disturbance in the MBS Site (allow only vehicles/equipment necessary for construction activities). o Do not park equipment or stockpile supplies in the MBS Site. o Do not place spoil in the MBS Site or other sensitive areas. o If possible, conduct the work under frozen ground conditions. 320 Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update (SRF Project #19234) MCE-2O25-OO646 Page 3 of 6 o Use effective erosion prevention and sediment control measures. o Inspect and clean equipment prior to operation and follow recommendations to prevent the spread of invasive species. o Revegetate disturbed soil with native species suitable to the local habitat as soon after construction as possible. o Use only weed -free mulches, topsoils, and seed mixes. Of particular concern are birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and crown vetch (Coronilla varia), two invasive species that are sold commercially and are problematic in prairies and disturbed open areas. Ecologically Significant Areas can be viewed using the Explore page in Minnesota Conservation Explorer (MCE) or their GIS shapefiles can be downloaded from the MN Geospatial Commons. Reference the MBS Site Biodiversity Significance and Native Plant Community websites for information on interpreting the data. To receive a list of Ecologically Significant Areas in the vicinity of your project, create a Conservation Planning Report using the Explore page in MCE. • If the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) is applicable to this project, please note that native plant communities with a Conservation Status Rank of S1 through S3 or wetlands within High or Outstanding MBS Sites of Biodiversity Significance may qualify as Rare Natural Communities (RNC) under WCA. Minnesota Rules, part 8420.0515, subpart 3 states that a wetland replacement plan for activities that modify a RNC must be denied if the local government unit determines the proposed activities will permanently adversely affect the RNC. If the proposed project includes a wetland replacement plan under WCA, please contact your DNR Regional Ecologist for further evaluation. Please visit WCA Program Guidance and Information for additional information, including the RNC Technical Guidance. State -listed Species • State -listed endangered and threatened plant species have been documented in the vicinity of the proposed project. Minnesota's Endangered Species Statute (Minnesota Statutes, section 84.0895) and associated Rules (Minnesota Rules, part 6212.1800 to 6212.2300 and 6134) prohibit the take of endangered or threatened plants or animals, including their parts or seeds, without a permit. o Butternut (Juglans cinerea), a state -listed endangered tree, has been documented within the proposed project boundary. This species occurs in mesic hardwood forests with loamy or alluvial soils or in sandy soil if the water table is relatively near the surface. It is perhaps most common on river terraces elevated several feet or more above the active floodplain, where it is protected from siltation and flood scouring. This species is susceptible to a lethal fungal disease called butternut canker (Sirococcus clavigignenti-juglandacearum). Nearly all of Minnesota's butternuts are dead or dying from the fungus, triggering the protected status of this tree within the state. To demonstrate avoidance, a qualified surveyor will need to identify any trees that are proposed to be removed. o Kitten -tails (Synthyris bullii), a state -listed threatened plant, has been documented in the vicinity of the proposed project. Habitat includes oak savanna communities, dry prairies, and oak - dominated fire dependent forests. The Minnesota populations are largely restricted to the bluffs and terraces of the St. Croix, Mississippi, and Minnesota River valleys, with many populations 321 Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update (SRF Project #19234) MCE-2O25-OO646 Page 4 of 6 occurring in the greater Twin Cities area. Plants show a preference for partial shade to full sunlight and upper slopes. Soils are most often, well -drained sandy to gravelly soil. To demonstrate avoidance, a qualified surveyor will need to determine if suitable habitat exists within the activity impact area and, if so, conduct a survey prior to any project activities. o Hooded arrowhead (Sagittaria montevidensis var. calycina), a state -listed threatened plant, has been documented in the vicinity of the proposed project along the shores of the Minnesota River. Hooded arrowhead is found along large silt and sandy areas that are exposed in May and June. Their habitat is very dependent on rainfall which means they may not appear every year. To demonstrate avoidance, a qualified surveyor will need to determine if suitable habitat exists within the activity impact area and, if so, conduct a survey prior to any project activities. Surveys must be conducted by a qualified surveyor and follow the standards contained in the Rare Species Survey Process and Rare Plant Guidance. Visit the Natural Heritage Review page for a list of certified surveyors and more information on this process. Survey proposals should be submitted to Reports.NHIS@state.mn.us prior to initiating survey work. Project planning should take into account that any botanical survey needs to be conducted during the appropriate time of the year, which may be limited. Please consult Review.NHIS@state.mn.us if you have any questions regarding this process. • Black buffalo (Ictiobus niger), a state -listed threatened fish species, have been documented within the Minnesota River in the vicinity of the proposed project. This species is found in the sloughs, backwaters, and impoundments of large rivers and spawns from April through mid -June. Minnesota's Endangered Species Statute (Minnesota Statutes, section 84.0895) and associated Rules (Minnesota Rules, part 6212.1800 to 6212.2300 and chapter 6134) prohibit the take of threatened or endangered species without a permit. If the project area contains suitable spawning habitat, work within the water needs to be avoided from April 1 through mid -June. Contact Review.NHIS@state.mn.us if this is not feasible, as further action may be needed. • Mudpuppy (Necturus maculosus), a state -listed salamander species of special concern, have been documented within the Minnesota River in the vicinity of the proposed project. Submerged structures, such as rocks, logs, or boards are essential habitat components for this species. This species is particularly vulnerable to deterioration in water quality, especially increased siltation. As such, it is important that effective erosion prevention and sediment control practices be implemented and maintained during construction and operation of the proposed project. We recommend avoiding work within water from May through July to protect nesting mudpuppies. • Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus), both state - listed species of special concern, have been documented in the vicinity of the proposed project. During the winter these bats hibernate in caves and mines. During the active season (approximately April - November) they roost underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees; and in human structures such as buildings and bridges. Activities that may impact bats include, but are not limited to, wind farm operation, any disturbance to hibernacula, and destruction/degradation of habitat. Tree removal can negatively impact bats by destroying roosting habitat, especially during the pup rearing season when females are forming maternity roosting colonies and the pups are not able to fly. To minimize impacts, we recommend that tree removal be avoided from June 1 through August 15. 322 Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update (SRF Project #19234) MCE-2O25-OO646 Page 5 of 6 • Lark sparrow (Chondestes grammacus) and purple Martin (Progne subis), both state -listed bird species of special concern, have been documented in the vicinity of the project. Lark Sparrows are found in open, grass land areas with scattered trees and shrubs. They build their nest on the ground, in a shrub or a small tree. Purple Martins nest in colonies and typically near water. In urban areas, they nest almost exclusively in nest boxes; while in rural areas they can be found nesting in cavities, such as woodpecker holes. If feasible, avoid disturbance to undisturbed grassland areas and tree and shrub removal from May 15 through August 15 to avoid disturbance of nesting birds. • Gophersnake (Pituophis catenifer), a state -listed species of special concern, has been documented in the vicinity of the proposed project and may be encountered on site. These nonvenomous snakes prefer grassy areas with sandy and gravel soils. Given the presence of these rare snakes, the DNR recommends that the use of erosion control mesh, if any, be limited to wildlife -friendly materials. • Sessile -flowered Yellow Cress (Rorippa sessiliflora), a plant species of special concern, has been documented in the vicinity of the proposed project along the shores of the Minnesota River. It is an annual species that occurs in early successional habitats along the Mississippi and Minnesota rivers. It occurs on seasonally exposed river sediments. If feasible, avoid suitable habitat. • Please visit the DNR Rare Species Guide for more information on the habitat use of state -listed species and recommended measures to avoid or minimize impacts. • Please report incidental sightings of state -listed species via the DNR Plant and Animal Observation Form. Federally Protected Species • To ensure compliance with federal law, conduct a federal regulatory review using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) online Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool. Please note that all projects, regardless of whether there is a federal nexus, are subject to federal take prohibitions. The IPaC review will determine if prohibited take is likely to occur and, if not, will generate an automated letter. • The northern long-eared bat is federally listed as endangered, please see USFWS Northern Long-eared Bat for additional information. • The area of interest overlaps with a U.S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Rusty Patched Bumble Bee High Potential Zone. The rusty patched bumble bee (Bombus affinis) is federally listed as endangered and is likely to be present in suitable habitat within High Potential Zones. From April through October this species uses underground nests in upland grasslands, shrublands, and forest edges, and forages where nectar and pollen are available. From October through April the species overwinters under tree litter in upland forests and woodlands. The rusty patched bumble bee may be impacted by a variety of land management activities including, but not limited to, prescribed fire, tree - removal, haying, grazing, herbicide use, pesticide use, land -clearing, soil disturbance or compaction, or use of non-native bees. If applicable, the DNR recommends reseeding disturbed soils with native species of grasses and forbs using BWSR Seed Mixes or MnDOT Seed Mixes. The USFWS RPBB guidance provides guidance on avoiding impacts to rusty patched bumble bee and a key for determining if actions are likely to affect the species; the determination key can be found in the appendix. 323 Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update (SRF Project #19234) MCE-2O25-OO646 Page 6 of 6 Environmental Review and Permitting • Given the potential presence of state protected species, we encourage submission of Natural Heritage Review requests to ensure avoidance of take for these species and to determine survey needs as individual projects are planned. • Please include a copy of this letter and the MCE-generated Final Project Report in any state or local license or permit application. Please note that measures to avoid or minimize disturbance to the above rare features may be included as restrictions or conditions in any required permits or licenses. The Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS), a collection of databases that contains information about Minnesota's rare natural features, is maintained by the Division of Ecological and Water Resources, Department of Natural Resources. The NHIS is continually updated as new information becomes available and is the most complete source of data on Minnesota's native plant communities, rare species, and other rare features. However, the NHIS is not an exhaustive inventory and does not contain the locations of all rare features in the state. Therefore, ecologically significant features for which we have no records may exist within the project area. If additional information becomes available regarding rare features in the vicinity of the project, further review may be necessary. For environmental review purposes, the results of this Natural Heritage Review are valid for one year; the results are only valid for the project location and project description provided with the request. If project details change or the project has not occurred within one year, please resubmit the project for review within one year of initiating project activities. Resubmit by selecting Clone Project as Draft on the project page in MCE. The Natural Heritage Review does not constitute project approval by the Department of Natural Resources. Instead, it identifies issues regarding known occurrences of rare features and potential impacts to these rare features. Visit Natural Heritage Review for additional information regarding this process, survey guidance, and other related information. For information on the environmental review process or other natural resource concerns, please contact your DNR Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist. Thank you for consulting us on this matter and for your interest in preserving Minnesota's rare natural resources. Sincerely, Digitally signed by Molly Barrett 771016y, 30,44,ett Date: 2025.09.18 13:32:56 -05'00' Natural Heritage Review Specialist molly.barrett@state.mn.us Cc: Melissa Collins, Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist, Central (Region 3) Cc: Amanda Weise, Regional Ecologist, Central (Region 3) Cc: Jennie Skancke, Wetlands Program Coordinator Cc: Keylor Andrews, Calcareous Fen Program Coordinator 324 Appendix G SHPO, MIAC, and OSA Information Jackson Township Development Area — AUAR Update IRF 325 SRF To: From: Date: Subject: MEMORANDUM SRF Project No. 19234 Mark Noble Senior Planner, Planning Division City of Shakopee Alicia Bock, Lead, Environmental Planning Jana Guseynova, Project Manager Environmental Planning SRF Consulting Group 11/26/2025 Cultural Resources — Jackson Township Development Area - AUAR Update Cultural Resources Introduction A review request was sent to the Minnesota SHPO on July 24, 2025. Due to capacity constraints, SHPO indicated that they were unable to provide updated information for the study area (see Attachments). As an alternative, SHPO recommended using the Minnesota Statewide Historic Inventory Portal (MnSHIP) online public map as a starting point (see Figure 1).' A review of the project area in the MnSHIP map identified 11 MnSHIP points within the project boundary, along with inventoried polygons and lines. These are shown in Figure 1 and listed in Table 1. The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank. 1 Minnesota Department of Administration. MnSHIP GIS Data Portal. Accessed 2 September 2025 and available at https://mnship.gisdata.mn.gov/. www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 I Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 1763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 326 Mark Noble City of Shakopee Figure 1: MnSHIP Online Application Review of the Study Area (boundary in black) Table 1: MnSHIP Property Listings within the Study Area 11/26/2025 Page 2 of 3 Historic Inventory Number Property Name Property Type MnSHIP ID Address SC-JAC-00015 commercial building Building 94169 12706 Chestnut Blvd SC-JAC-00016 Auto Depot Building 94170 12701 Johnson Memorial Dr SC-JAC-00006 Jackson Town Hall Building 94160 Off Co. Hwy 15 SC-JAC-00005 Farmstead Building 94159 Off Co. Hwy 15 SC-JAC-00013 Weckman House Building 94167 2183 Colburn Dr SC-JAC-00011 Ferrozzo House Building 94165 2130 Colburn Dr. SC-JAC-00012 Koesters House Building 94166 2140 Colburn Dr SC-JAC-00010 ECSY Partnership House Building 94164 1181- Bonnevista Dr SC-JAC-00009 Macllister Housse Building 94163 2500 Strunks Rd SC-JAC-0000 Stone House Building 94161 Unknown SC-JAC-00003* Strunk-Nyssen House Building 94157 Off U.S. Hwy 169 *Denotes National Register Listed or Eligible SRF 327 Mark Noble City of Shakopee 11/26/2025 Page 3 of 3 There are several restricted polygons for townships within the study area, which MnSHIP does not offer additional detail for those with public access level only. Restricted polygons may include information about archaeological sites, burials, traditional cultural places, or other property types that have protected information under state or federal law.2 In addition, the OSA maintains an online public map; however, it does not allow project location files to be uploaded. For specific projects within the study area, it is recommended that the OSA be contacted directly, and a project review form be submitted. Conclusion This review does not constitute adequate identification or a complete project review under state or federal historic preservation laws. Project -specific evaluations must be conducted as individual projects within the AUAR study area advance, in consultation with the Minnesota SHPO under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (36 CFR 800), when federal funds, permits, or authorizations are involved in a federal undertaking.3 Additional coordination may also be required with the OSA,4 the MIAC,5 and other appropriate organizations. Attachments 1. SHPO response email (August 21, 2025) 2 Department of Administration State Historic Preservation Office. Minnesota Statewide Historic Inventory Portal (MnSHIP) User Guide. Accessed November 2025 and available at MnSHIP User Guide. 3 Minnesota Department of Administration. Submitting a Project for Review. Accessed September 2025 and available at https://mn.gov/admin/shpo/environmental-review/submit/. 4 Minnesota Department of Administration. Your Role -Government. Accessed 2 September 2025 and available at https://mn.gov/admin/archaeologist/government/your-role/. 5 Minnesota Indian Affairs Council. Project Review Form Instructions. Accessed 2 September 2025 and available at https://mn.gov/indian-affairs/cultural-resources/project-review-form jsp. SRF 328 Alicia Bock From: Sent: To: Subject: GraggJohnson, Kelly (ADM)<kelly.graggjohnson@state.mn.us> Thursday, August 21, 2025 12:27 PM Alicia Bock RE: Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update - SHPO Review Request External Sender Warning: This message was sent from an external sender. Do not click on any links or open any attachments unless you know and trust the sender. Hi Alicia -we recommend you include the information you gathered from MnSHIP in the AUAR update, so that this information is included in the public document. We do not have the capacity to provide technical assistance on these types of planning documents. Thanks, Kelly rnI" DEPARTMENT OF III ADMINISTRATION STATE HISTORIC PRESEPVATL{ H OFFICE Kelly Gragg-Johnson (she/her/hers) I Environmental Review Specialist 50 Sherburne Avenue, Suite 203 Saint Paul, MN 55155 (651) 201-3285 I kelly.graggjohnson@state.mn.us This message may be from an external email source. Do not select links or open attachments unless verified. Report all suspicious emails to Minnesota IT Services Security Operations Center. Greetings, I am following up with some additional schedule information regarding the AUAR update and the data request (below email from July). Would it be possible to receive a response back by September 20 at the latest? Here's the full schedule to be able to meet the 5 -year update deadline: a. SRF drafts update —July 15- Sep 5 b. City reviews draft - Sept 8-12 c. SRF Revises — Sept 15-19 d. Submit AUAR to EQB - September 23 i. SRF submit on behalf of City e. Public comment and agency review period — Sept 30 -Oct 14 1 329 f. Planning Commission Meeting- October 9 i. Use public hearing portion as public meeting g. Final updates/edits after public comment period - October 13-17 h. Final City Council meeting -October 21St i. EQB Monitor notice - October 28 j. EQB Publish Date - November 4 k. Final deadline November 7 (fully accepted) Sincerely, Alicia Alicia Bock She/Her/Hers Lead, Environmental Planning SRF Consulting Group 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 Direct: 763-340-1824 I abock@srfconsulting.com SRF srfconsulting.com I Facebook I Linkedln I Twitter I Vimeo I Instagram CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email message and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. This transmission is sent in trust, for the sole purpose of delivery to the intended recipient. *Why are pronouns important? From: Alicia Bock Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2025 11:08 AM To: MN ADM ENV Review SHPO <enreviewshpo@state.mn.us> Subject: Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update - SHPO Review Request Greetings, Please see the attached review request form and project description for the Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update. Project figures and the previous inventory forms (for reference) are available for download here: El 250724_Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update_Attachments Sincerely, Alicia Alicia Bock She/Her/Hers Lead, Environmental Planning SRF Consulting Group 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 Direct: 763-340-1824 I abock@srfconsulting.com 2 330 IRF srfconsulting.com I Facebook I LinkedIn I Twitter I Vmeo I Instagram CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email message and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. This transmission is sent in trust, for the sole purpose of delivery to the intended recipient. *Why are pronouns important? 3 331 Appendix H Transportation Memo Jackson Township Development Area — AUAR Update SRF 332 �SRF Mark Noble, Senior Planner To. : City Shakopee Shako ee Brent Clark, PE, Project Manager From: Eric Wurst, EIT, Engineer II Date: 12/1/2025 Subject: Jackson Township AUAR Transportation Analysis Update Introduction MEMORANDUM SRF Project No. 19234 The Shakopee Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Transportation Analysis was developed by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. (SRF) in February 2020 (hereon referred to as the Jackson Township AUAR). This comprehensive study evaluated the transportation impacts and mitigation measures associated with development within the southwestern orderly annexation area of Jackson Township. The study area is generally bounded by MN Highway 41 to the west, County Road 78 to the south, County Road 79 to the east, and US 169 to the north. Since completion of the Jackson Township AUAR, the following studies have been conducted within the AUAR development area: 1) Highview Park Residential Development Traffic Study, SRF Consulting (February 2023) a. The Highview Park residential development proposed a higher density than assumed in the Jackson Township AUAR, prompting a traffic study to determine if additional mitigation would be needed prior to site development. The study recommended future internal connections to CR 69 and CR 15, monitoring of the CR 78/Zumbro Avenue intersection, potential early traffic control improvements at CR 78/CR 15, and identified pedestrian crossing alternatives for CR 78. 2) Marystown Road Corridor Study — Design Update, SRF Consulting (April 2024) a. The Marystown Road Corridor Study, originally completed in 2020, was updated to reflect post -pandemic travel patterns and current development conditions along the corridor. The update supported final design efforts for a 2025/2026 roundabout reconstruction project, which includes two study intersections within the Jackson Township AUAR area, to improve safety, capacity, and multimodal connectivity. While these studies have helped determine specific geometric design improvements and monitor individual development parcels, the Jackson Township AUAR is required to be updated every five (5) years until the site is fully developed. Therefore, the purpose of this transportation analysis update is to collect updated traffic data, provide a comprehensive overview of current land use assumptions and mitigation status, and evaluate whether previous mitigation remains sufficient or if additional improvements are necessary. The following sections provide the assumptions, analysis, and recommendations for consideration. www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 I Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 1763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 333 Jackson Township AUAR Transportation Analysis Update 12/1/2025 Page 2 of 15 AUAR Assumptions The Jackson Township AUAR was reviewed to identify key assumptions associated with land use, evaluation scenarios, trip generation, and infrastructure improvements. The evaluation scenario assumptions, as well as infrastructure mitigation status, are summarized in the following sections. Evaluation Scenarios/Land Use As part of the original AUAR, two future scenarios were evaluated and summarized below: • 2040 Comp Plan Scenario: This scenario reflected land use and staging assumptions consistent with the adopted Scott County 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the City of Shakopee 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which were considered aligned. It represented a growth scenario based on officially adopted planning documents and was used as the baseline or "no -build" alternative. • Max Build Scenario: This scenario reflected the City of Shakopee's full build -out potential based on feasible and expected development within the AUAR study area. Land use assumptions were developed in coordination with City staff using parcel -level planned land use and developable acreages. The Jackson Township AUAR evaluated and developed mitigation improvements for both the 2040 Comp Plan and Max Build scenarios. The current land use proposal, referred to as the "2025 AUAR Update" scenario, is based on the most up to date land use projections for the AUAR development area. Note these projections take into account developments that have recently been constructed, developments that have gone through and/or are going through the City of Shakopee's approval process, as well as future land use predictions, including parcels that are not expected to redevelop by 2040 based on discussions with City staff. A detailed summary of the specific parcel assumptions and differences in trip generation is provided later in this document. A summary of the previous and current land use assumptions within the Jackson Township AUAR is shown in Table 1. Residential projections have increased and now exceed the Max Build scenario. Conversely, both retail and non -retail employment projections fall below the Max Build scenario, with retail employment even slightly lower than the original Comp Plan assumptions. These differences indicate a shift toward more residential -driven growth, with overall development intensity remaining within the bounds of what the AUAR process is intended to evaluate albeit with a heavier emphasis on housing and less on employment uses than originally envisioned. Land Use Type Comp Plan Max Build AUAR Update 1 Residential DU Retail Employment Non -Retail Employment 1,154 141 1,366 2,013 1,610 8,392 2,918 52 3,499 1 Employment estimates were based on square footage assumptions and conversion factors discussed later in this document. Note these projections also include existing land uses to be consistent with the previous scenarios. SRF 334 Jackson Township AUAR Transportation Analysis Update 12/1/2025 Page 3 of 15 Infrastructure Review Several improvements were identified as part of the Jackson Township AUAR. The specific mitigation associated with each scenario are summarized in Table 2. Note the table also summarizes whether the improvement has been or is planned to be implemented (highlighted in blue) and corresponds to Figure 1. The remaining mitigation that has not been implemented ranges from turn lane modifications to traffic control (i.e. roundabout/signal) improvements. Table 2 Jackson Township AUAR Infrastructure Improvement Review Intersection Improvement Summary Implementation Status 2040 Comp Plan MN 41 Construct 4 -lane divided roadway Not Implemented MN 41/Rail Frontage Rd Construct turn lanes on side -street approaches Implemented in 2024 Marystown rystown Rd/US 169 RampsConstruct signal or roundabout Implementation Planned for 2025/2026 CR 15/CR 16 Construct signal or roundabout Implemented in 2022 CR 15/CR 78 Construct left -turn lanes on all approaches Not Implemented Max Build MN 41/Rail Frontage Rd Construct a traffic signal Not Implemented CR 78/Emery Way Construct signal with turn lanes or roundabout Not Implemented CR 78/CR 69 Construct signal with turn lanes or roundabout Implemented in 2024 CR 78/CR 73 (Zumbro) Construct EB and WB left -turn lanes Implemented in 2021 CR 78/CR 15 Construct signal with turn lanes or roundabout Not Implemented CR 78/CR 77 Construct SB right- and EB left -turn lane Not Implemented CR 78/CR 79 Construct signal with turn lanes or roundabout Implemented in 2025 CR 69/10th Ave/Chaparral Ave Construct signal or roundabout. Reconstruct Chaparral Ave to align with 10th Ave Not Implemented p CR 69/Vierling Drive Construct signal or roundabout Not Implemented CR 69/US 169 Ramps Construct signal or roundabout Not Implemented CR 69 Subdistrict AB 69/Subdistrict Access signal with turn lanes or roundabout. g Implementation Planned When East Leg Constructed CR 69/CR 16 Extension Construct signal or roundabout 2 Not Implemented CR 15/128th Street Construct NB and SB left -turn lanes Not Implemented 2 Note that southbound left -turn and northbound right -turn lanes are anticipated as part of the CR 16 extension project. However, the west leg of the intersection is no longer assumed in this study, which may affect the need for future traffic control improvements. SRF 335 CO M peon uMoJsit.JeW L Cfl � o 0 0 I• • I U N U • •, • • • • • • • • I II I LL HO V S • GNL N N O s R U 6L HO 96 HO £L HO 69 HO LLI LLI J CD -0 cp a) N E E EO a> a7 o a) a O O L L Q Q co E a) N O L CL 11 U) co CD CO 0_ (13 O co F Q LE O ca City of Shakopee Jackson Township AUAR Transportation Analysis Update 12/1/2025 Page 5of15 In addition to infrastructure improvements, there have been updates to access assumptions within the study area. As part of the planned extension of CR 16 (17th Avenue) to CR 69, a west leg of the intersection is no longer assumed, removing a potential access point to Subdistrict B that had been included in the original AUAR. Instead, Subdistrict B is expected to rely on the future internal roadway connection between Emery Way and the current "Optum" intersection directly south of the US 169 interchange, which was previously assumed in the original study. A development parcel in the southeast quadrant of Subdistrict B may also have direct access to CR 78. In addition, while not included in the original AUAR or listed in Table 2, a pedestrian underpass was constructed just west of the CR 78/Zumbro Avenue intersection. This improvement was constructed to enhance pedestrian safety and connectivity, particularly for nearby residents accessing the new Jackson Commons Park. 2025 AUAR Update Scenario The 2025 AUAR Update scenario land use and trip generation were reviewed and compared to the original AUAR assumptions. The following sections outline the current land use, trip generation data associated with the updated assumptions, and whether previous mitigation remains sufficient or if additional improvements are necessary. Land Use As mentioned previously, the 2025 AUAR Update scenario is based on the most up to date land use projections within the Jackson Township AUAR development area. These projections take into account developments that have been recently constructed/open, developments that have gone through and/or are going through the City of Shakopee's approval process, as well as future land use predictions, including parcels that are not expected to redevelop by 2040. A detailed breakdown of the land use assumptions per parcel are shown in Figure 2. Note that developments that have been constructed or have been through/currently going through the City of Shakopee's approval process are highlighted in purple, future land use predictions are highlighted in blue, and parcels not expected to redevelop by 2040 are shown without color. Note these uncolored parcels are assumed not to redevelop by 2040 due to a variety of factors, including being already fully developed (captured in existing counts) , not eligible for annexation until 2050, designated as park, open space, or bluff land, located in areas considered undesirable for development, owned by users not expected to sell by 2040, or reserved for other infrastructure uses such as utilities or cell towers. Labels on the map indicate the specific reason for a parcel's exclusion. Each specific subdistrict land use assumptions were compared to the original AUAR assumptions and are shown in Table 3. The updated land use projections show notable shifts primarily in Subdistricts A, B, C, and D. Subdistrict A has increased residential development but reduced employment compared to original assumptions. Subdistricts B and D have significantly lower employment than the Max Build scenario, yet their projections remain between the Comp Plan and Max Build levels. Subdistrict C shows a substantial increase in residential development beyond prior Max Build estimates. Meanwhile, Subdistricts E, F, and G generally align with the Max Build assumptions. SRF 337 1-0 may Open Space/Park 4 10 Open Space/Park Open Space/Pa'. 24 50 29 1M SF Business Pads 19 21 Corms 10 KSF Expansion Boat Dealer 190 KSF Business Park Xcel Substation Mobile Home Pads 500 KSF Business Parr 14 32 Nyssens Lake 30 Single Family (not expected to sell) 15 37 38 39 42 43 44 45 46 47 70 KSF skies Perk 300 KSF Open Space Industrial 150 KSF Office 18 17 Single amilv 19 20 21 280 DU Ap Residential 245 DU Residential # 22 to sell) 23 130 DU Residential 24 130 DU ResttleMlal......... 25 120 DU Residential 225 DU ...................................... kesddential ...................................... 290 DU Residential 7 85 DU Residential LEGEND - Built/Approved - Estimated by 2040 - No Change Expected by 2040 - Subdistrict Area Park 4.5 KSF Expansron Veterinary sink 14 KSF Medical Office 24 KSF Retail 138 DU Resdential Fully Developed (RResidential) 5 31 DU Residential 6 Not for Annex- Until 2O50 0 10 588 DU Residential :......................... X11 Scott Towel. 15 16 Not E.. forArme�ration Urrs12050 30 DU 'esklentiel 14 209 DU Residential 17th Avenue 17 DU Residential 82 DU Residential (3 DUA) CR 78 SRFUpdated Land Use Assumptions Jackson Township AUAR Transportation Analysis Update 02519234 December 2025 City of Shakopee Figure 2 338 Jackson Township AUAR Transportation Analysis Update 12/1/2025 Page 7 of 15 In addition, while not explicitly expressed in the data, the composition of non -retail employment has shifted between the original AUAR and the 2025 update. Previously, non -retail employment consisted largely of general office uses (approximately 60 percent) , whereas in the 2025 AUAR Update, non -retail employment largely consists of industrial and industrial -type uses. Table 3 Land Use Comparison Subdistrict Land Use Type 3 Land Use Comparison LComp Plan Max Build AUAR Update 4 A Residential DU Retail (Emp) Non -Retail (Emp) 304 0 990 334 539 1,003 505 0 750 B Residential DU Retail (Emp) Non -Retail (Emp) 361 422 341 0 709 0 160 4,958 1,507 C Residential DU Retail (Emp) Non -Retail (Emp) 30 450 0 4 1,372 63 0 0 2 D Residential DU Retail (Emp) Non -Retail (Emp) 238 339 209 34 188 34 117 2,344 1,191 E Residential DU Retail (Emp) Non -Retail (Emp) 15 113 123 7 11 0 7 0 7 F Residential DU Retail (Emp) Non -Retail (Emp) 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 G Residential DU Retail (Emp) Non -Retail (Emp) 200 355 368 100 100 18 87 87 42 3 DU = Dwelling Unit 4 Bold italics indicate land uses that exceed the original Max Build assumptions, while bold italics in red highlight land uses that substantially exceed those assumptions. SRF 339 Jackson Township AUAR Transportation Analysis Update 12/1/2025 Page 8 of 15 Conversion Factors Note the original AUAR relied on socio-economic (SE) data, such as residential units and retail and non -retail employment, while the 2025 AUAR Update scenario is based primarily on square -footage assumptions provided by the City of Shakopee. To maintain consistency between these two data frameworks, conversion factors were applied to convert employment to square footage (SF) and vice versa. The following conversion factors, carried forward from the original AUAR, were applied: • 0.75 retail employees per 1,000 SF • 1.5 industrial employees per 1,000 SF • 3.0 office employees per 1,000 SF Although these values were generally consistent with the 2025 AUAR Update Scenario, the update scenario applied a rate of 1.0 industrial employees per 1,000 SF to better align with City Code requirements. These conversion factors were used throughout the AUAR to make SE data and square footage interchangeable for comparison and documentation purposes, given the differing forecasting methodologies, which are further detailed in the Trip Generation section. Trip Generation The forecasts developed for the original Jackson Township AUAR were largely based on the Scott County Regional Travel Demand Model, supplemented by NCITE trip rates applied to socio-economic datasets to estimate trip generation by subdistrict. However, for this AUAR update, a more simplified forecasting approach was utilized. Note the regional travel demand model is now outdated, and with increased clarity around current and planned development in the AUAR area, it was deemed more appropriate to apply ITE trip generation rates directly to land use assumptions. While the forecasting methodology differs, both approaches generate daily trip estimates by subdistrict, allowing for a direct comparison between the original AUAR scenarios and the updated projections. This comparison is summarized in Table 4, while Figure 3 illustrates where daily trip generation has increased or decreased compared to the Max Build scenario. Given that routing patterns can be heavily influenced by the parcel location, identifying trip generation differences at the subdistrict level can help pinpoint where potential impacts to the roadway network may occur. SRF 340 mer LEGEND 48% 29% 51% 267% - Over Max Build (>120%) - Near Max Build (80-120%) - Under Max Build (<80%) - Not Developable (0%) XX% - % of Max Build Daily Trips - Subdistrict Area - Study Intersection 94% 100% 17th Avenue CR 78 Estimated Daily Trip Comparison SRFJackson Township AUAR Transportation Analysis Update 02519234 December 2025 City of Shakopee Figure 3 341 Jackson Township AUAR Transportation Analysis Update 12/1/2025 Page 10 of 15 Table 4 Daily Trips Comparison Subdistrict ll Daily Trip Comparison I Comp Plan Max Build AUAR Update 5 A B C D E F G 6,201 3,809 284 3,011 254 58 3,455 13,793 30,723 4,901 13,793 1,166 0 4,850 7,044 8,763 13,071 6,596 1,165 0 4,552 Total Daily Trips 17,071 69,224 41,191 Key findings of the trip generation comparison are summarized in the bullets below: • The 2025 AUAR Update falls between the Comp Plan and Max Build Scenarios: The total daily trips projected in this AUAR Update fall between the 2040 Comp Plan and Max Build Scenarios, but with notable geographic shifts in trip density: o The south side (Subdistrict C) shows a significant increase in projected trips. o The east side (Subdistrict G and E) remains generally consistent with the Max Build scenario. o The west side (Subdistricts A, B, and D) aligns more closely with the Comp Plan scenario, and reflects less intensive development than previously assumed in the Max Build. • Subdistrict C Surpasses Max Build Assumptions: Subdistrict C is the only area where projected daily trips in this AUAR Update exceed the Max Build scenario, at more than 2.5 times the previously forecasted volumes. While the Highview Park Traffic Study previously evaluated potential traffic impacts from increased development in this area, the current land use assumptions go beyond those studied, indicating a need to review infrastructure and operations in this subdistrict and surrounding roadways. Therefore, the following section evaluates whether previously recommended mitigation measures remain necessary given the updated trip forecasts, and identifies where prior improvements may no longer be needed, or where new improvements may be required to address changes in development intensity and traffic patterns, particularly in Subdistrict C. 5 Bold italics indicate trip generation that exceed the original Max Build assumptions, while bold italics in red highlight trip generation that substantially exceed those assumptions. SRF 342 Jackson Township AUAR Transportation Analysis Update 12/1/2025 Page 11 of15 Infrastructure Review Based on the changes in both trip density and location, future peak hour turning movement counts were developed, and intersection operations were reviewed to determine whether previously identified infrastructure mitigation remains necessary, or if additional improvements are warranted. As previously discussed in the Trip Generation section, the traffic forecasting methodology was refined as part of this AUAR update. Accordingly, future peak hour turning movements were developed based on new existing turning movement counts, a general background growth rate, and trips generated by the AUAR development area, as detailed below. The updated peak hour forecasts are included in Attachment 1 of this document. • Existing turning movement counts were collected in May 2025 at several study intersections (shown in Attachment 1) to establish a new base volume set for the AUAR study area. Counts were collected while area schools were in session to reflect typical weekday conditions. However, it should be noted that some localized road closures by Scott County occurred near the time of the counts, which may have slightly influenced travel patterns. • A general background growth rate of one half (0.5) percent was applied to the existing peak hour traffic volumes. This growth rate is consistent with previous studies within the area, and represents a conservative estimate, given the AUAR development area is expected to account for a majority of future growth within the study area. • Trip generation estimates for the proposed land uses were developed for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours and daily basis using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. These trips were distributed to the adjacent roadway network based on existing travel patterns and engineering judgement. To evaluate future traffic operations, an intersection capacity analysis was completed using Synchro/SimTraffic software. All infrastructure improvements that have already been implemented or are planned to be implemented were assumed within the model. The focus of the analysis was to determine whether any remaining mitigation measures from the original AUAR are still warranted under the updated traffic forecasts. Results of the analysis, summarized in Table 3 and illustrated in Figure 4, indicate that several mitigation measures identified in the original AUAR may no longer be needed based on the updated traffic forecasts, while others remain necessary to accommodate development through 2040. Additionally, a few new mitigation measures have been identified in response to changes in projected traffic patterns and development assumptions, as further discussed below. It should be noted that the updated mitigation measures are solely based on future traffic volumes and peak hour operations; other factors such as safety, warrants, or policy may also necessitate future improvements. SRF 343 Jackson Township AUAR Transportation Analysis Update 12/1/2025 Page 12 of 15 Table 3 Jackson Township AUAR Infrastructure Improvement Update Intersection Improvement Summary May No Longer Be Needed CR 78/Emery Way Construct signal or roundabout CR 69/10th Ave/Chaparral Ave Construct signal or roundabout. Reconstruct Chaparral Ave to align with 10th Ave. p g CR 69/Vierling Drive Construct signal or roundabout CR 69/CR 16 Extension Construct signal or roundabout CR 78/CR 77 Construct SB right- and EB left -turn lane Comp Plan/Max Build Mitigation Still Needed MN 41 Construct 4 -lane divided roadway 6 MN 41/Rail Frontage Rd Construct a traffic signal CR 69/US 169 Ramps Construct signal or roundabout CR 78/Emery Way Construct SBL Turn Lane CR 78/CR 15 Construct signal with turn lanes or roundabout CR 15/128th Street Construct NB and SB left -turn lanes New Mitigation Marystown Road/US 169 Ramps Construct turn lanes CR 78/CR 73 (Zumbro Avenue) Restrict to 3/4 access or construct signal or roundabout Subdistrict C Provide direct connections to CR 69 and CR 15 6Although a 4 -lane divided river crossing is still expected to be needed long term, the City of Chaska recently reconstructed its downtown segment from a 4 -lane divided roadway to a 2 -lane divided roadway with turn lanes. Similarly, the MN 41 intersection at the MN Rail Frontage Road was recently rebuilt as a 2 -lane roadway with turn lanes. Given the limited number of river crossings in the area, the long-term capacity of this corridor will require further discussion and evaluation by area stakeholders. SRF 344 E E cn a) E N O C. W V A� W CU a) ca CL co a co 0 Co co I..1� Q LE 0 co City of Shakopee Jackson Township AUAR Transportation Analysis Update 12/1/2025 Page 14 of 15 Several mitigation measures identified in the original AUAR under Max Build scenario may no longer be needed. This is due to the following: • These mitigation measures were largely associated with the Max Build scenario, and the current development proposal is less intensive, particularly near the affected intersections. • Access changes have occurred that reduce demand at certain intersections. For example, the west leg of the CR 69/CR 16 Extension intersection is no longer planned. Additionally, most development in Subdistrict D is expected to access the system via the MN 41/Dem- Con intersection, rather than through CR 69. The "new" mitigation measures have largely been identified in previous studies, as summarized below: • Marystown Road/US 169 Ramps — Based on the findings of the Marystown Road Corridor Study — Design Update, the project team prioritized safety for both vehicles and pedestrians. As a result, additional turn lanes/circulating lanes were not desired by the project team unless they were essential from a traffic operations perspective. Therefore, the roundabout designs allow for future modifications if needed, including the following. Additionally, the potential for two southbound circulating lanes will be evaluated as part of future roadway rehabilitation projects. o A westbound right -turn lane at the US 169 North Ramp o A northbound right -turn lane at the US 169 South Ramp • Subdistrict C — As outlined in the Highview Park Residential Development Traffic Study, direct connections are recommended from future residential developments in Subdistrict C to CR 69 and CR 15. These connections would provide alternative routes for local traffic and reduce demand at the CR 78/Zumbro Avenue intersection. • CR 78/Zumbro Drive — The intersection should be monitored and, if traffic volumes or safety concerns warrant, either restricted to a three-quarter access or upgraded to a traffic signal or roundabout. o It should be noted that while a signal or roundabout may meet current County spacing guidelines based on the existing CR 78 classification as a minor arterial, the Scott County Comprehensive Plan projects CR 78 will be upgraded to a Principal Arterial. Under this classification, traffic control improvements require a minimum spacing of 1 mile; therefore, the current 1/2 -mile spacing would not meet those requirements. Note that these infrastructure improvement updates are based on the latest development assumptions and operations, and other factors such as safety, policy, or warrants, may also necessitate future improvements. All mitigation alternatives should continue to be monitored over time to determine if and when improvements are needed. In addition, intersection/signal warrants should be evaluated and met prior to implementing any traffic control improvements. SRF 346 Jackson Township AUAR Transportation Analysis Update 12/1/2025 Page 15 of 15 Summary SRF has completed an updated transportation analysis for the Jackson Township AUAR, located in the southwestern orderly annexation area of Jackson Township, MN. Key findings of the transportation analysis update are summarized below. • Infrastructure Review: Several mitigation measures have been or are planned to be implemented, as shown in Figure 1. • Land Use Changes: Residential growth has increased beyond the original Maximum Build projections, while retail and employment growth has remained similar to the Comp Plan ("no build") assumptions, indicating a shift toward more housing -focused development. • Trip Generation: Updated daily trip generation falls between the original 2040 Comp Plan and Max Build scenarios, with notable increases in the southern subdistrict (Subdistrict C), warranting further evaluation of infrastructure needs. • Updated Mitigation Needs: Based on updated traffic forecasts, the revised mitigation needs are summarized in Table 3 and Figure 4. Note that these mitigation updates are based solely on projected traffic volumes and operations; other factors such as safety, warrants, or policy may also necessitate future improvements. Key takeaways include: o Most remaining mitigation measures remain valid. o Some improvements may no longer be needed due to reduced traffic volumes or changes in access. o New mitigation measures have been identified at the following locations. These are consistent with previous studies completed within the area. • Construct right -turn lanes at Marystown Road / US 169 Ramps • Restrict or implement traffic control improvements at CR 78 / Zumbro Avenue; note that traffic control changes may not meet County spacing guidelines due to potential future changes in CR 78's classification. • Provide direct internal roadway connections in Subdistrict C to CR 15 and CR 69 Overall, this AUAR transportation update reflects current development conditions and provides refined traffic and infrastructure guidance through 2040. All mitigation measures should continue to be monitored to determine if and when implementation is needed. 19234 Jackson Township AUAR Transportation Section Update 251201.docx SRF 347 ATTACHMENT 1 SRF 0 0 a) a, Cll co CZ U) > ca Cll Q -o CZ ciTs C/) O 7 -0 0 U U o Q Ca ▪ co N- Q O 0 N - On n= Co Cf) > C!) U _ co F- co a) a) DC a) 00000 a) N O co (/) .. O U) C ca .O 0 � J ca c V O J ; -t = O VU co 43 0_ CD 0 O swept,' pd umwsAJeL 0. end IeaaedegO 0 0 OO CR 16 (17th Ave) ocge �, O LL dO O 128th Street W 0 co e O 0 env oaquinz 69 dO 0 0O v O ap uoO cua p 6L dO 9L dO £L dO X La CL 0- a) co C/) .U) Ca ca � o O U) co 12 O ~ < O0 LE cs c ca H . o L City of Shakopee LO N O N M a, N sa O7 E LD 0 N N O a 0 M A.M. Peak Hour Volume P.M. Peak Hour Volume 000 O ca c- a O a> U- CR 16 (17th Ave) 5s (ss) r' M Egg (SL£) 11,* 4- 9 (5) (vzz) EOE (ccs) zoz o N / Pd uMWSitieL IL do 6180 51. HO IL HO a) Q 0 ca C.) a) (1) ca 0_ U) U) a) a) 0 U- ✓ a) N a) a) 0_ a) co CD - co co a) 0 0 Ca F Q f!1 ▪ N N o_ 0 i 0 u) o ▪ U N M � O � � U O O Appendix I GHG Emissions Memo Jackson Township Development Area — AUAR Update IRF 351 -SRF MEMORANDUM SRF Project No. 19234.00 To: From: Date: Subject: Mark Noble, Senior Planner City of Shakopee Derek Tollette, Environmental Planner, SRF Consulting Group December 2, 2025 Jackson Township Development Area — AUAR Update Introduction Since the Next Generation Energy Act was signed into law in 2007,1 it has been important for Minnesota Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) documents to include information about the potential effects of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and carbon footprint of proposed projects. The original Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the Jackson Township Development Area was completed in 2020. This memorandum serves as the 5 -year update to the GHG emissions and carbon footprint analyses for the Development Scenarios, as described in the AUAR document. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions/Carbon Footprint a. GHG Quantification: For all proposed projects, provide quantification and discussion of project GHG emissions. Include additional rows in the tables as necessary to provide project -specific emission sources. Describe the methods used to quantify emissions. If calculation methods are not readily available to quantify GHG emissions for a source, describe the process used to cometo that conclusion and any GHG emission sources not included in the total calculation. GHG emissions for each Development Scenario were quantified using the methodologies for developing a carbon footprint laid out in the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board's (EQB's) Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Guidance (June 2024)2 and the EQB's Climate Calculator Tool (May 2025).3 GHG emissions from the Development Scenarios consist of operation emissions that include building energy consumption and hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) leakage, 1 Minnesota Legislature. 2024 Minnesota Statutes. Chapter 216H: Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Accessed 4 September 2025 and available at https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/216h. 2 Environmental Quality Board (EQB). Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) guidance: Developing a carbon footprint and incorporating climate adaptation and resilience. Updated by EQB staff June 2024. Accessed 20 August 2025 and available at https://www.eqb.state.mn.us/sites/eqb/files/2024 eaw climate guidance 2.pdf. EQB Climate assessments. Climate Calculator Tool. Updated by EQB staff May 2025. Accessed 18 August 2025 and available at https://www.egb.state.mn.us/environmental-review/climate-assessments. www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 I Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 1763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 352 Mark Noble, Senior Planner City of Shakopee December 2, 2025 Page 2 of 3 construction emissions that include material inputs, transportation of material inputs, employee commuting, construction equipment, construction land use change, and construction waste, and additional on -road vehicles as a result of development. Analyses for GHG emissions for the Development Scenarios are included in Attachment A. GHG Assessment i. Describe any mitigation considered to reduce the project's GHG emissions. Development plans are concept -level during this phase of site planning, however the following design strategies and sustainability measures would be considered to reduce GHG emissions: • Encourage and integration of alternative modes of transportation. • Energy efficient building shells. • Use of energy efficient appliances, equipment, and lighting. • Implement waste best management practices, including recycling and composting appropriate materials when applicable. • Utilize native landscaping and trees to improve local air quality, absorb GHG emissions, and reduce local urban heat island effect. • Provide electric vehicle charging infrastructure. • Include solar photovoltaic installations. • Compact, mixed -use development patterns which allow residents to minimize vehicle miles traveled. Implementation of the above strategies would be evaluated on a case -by -case basis based on feasibility, code requirements, schedule, and tenant considerations. ii. Describe and quantify reductions from selected mitigation, if proposed to reduce the project's GHG emissions. Explain why the selected mitigation was preferred. In addition to the mitigation measures listed above, the proposed Development Scenarios would increase residential and commercial density within the project area. Table 1 shows a summary of existing land use under the Development Scenarios. Table 1: Development Scenarios for the GHG Analysis 2040 Comp Plan Max Build 2025 AUAR Update Land Use Dwelling Units Area (sq. ft.) Residential 1,154 2,885,000 Commercial - 463,000 Industrial - 368,000 Units Area (sq. ft.) 2,013 5,032,500 - 3,827,000 - 2,241,000 Dwelling Units Area (sq. ft.) 2,918 7,295,000 - 99,000 - 3,066,000 SRF 353 Mark Noble, Senior Planner City of Shakopee December 2, 2025 Page 3of3 Residential density would remain consistent with existing development in the project area (approximately 3 units per acre for single family homes) and include a 130 -unit apartment complex. Commercial spaces would allow for the creation of mixed -use zones that allow residents to drive less and thus emit fewer GHGs. It is also assumed that future development would incorporate trail and sidewalk connections to the surrounding network, allowing for a reduction in single -occupancy vehicle travel. iii. Quantify the proposed projects predicted net lifetime GHG emissions (total tons/# of years) and how those predicted emissions may affect achievement of the Minnesota Next Generation Energy Act goals and/or other more stringent state or local GHG reduction goals. Minnesota's Next Generation Energy Act requires the state to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the state by 80% between 2005 and 2050, while supporting clean energy, energy efficiency, and supplementing other renewable energy standards. The City of Shakopee 2040 Comprehensive Plan includes a recommendation to establish a climate action plan with clear, realistic GHG reduction goals and strategies.4 Any development will utilize GHG reduction strategies outlined in the City's climate action plan to help support the City's and state's goals of GHG emissions reduction. Table 2 shows the predicted emissions of the Development Area for each Development Scenario over the lifespan of 50 years. Table 2: GHG Emissions Summary for the Development Scenarios without Mitigation Strategies Scenario Total Emissions (tons/year) Net Total Emissions (tons/year) Building Area (sq. ft.) Total Emissions per Building Area (tons/sq. ft.) 2040 Comp Plan 31,472 - 3,716,000 0.47 Max Build 136,765 105,293 11,100,500 0.68 2025 AUAR Update 165,335 133,863 10,460,000 0.87 Developments may also implement any applicable state or local GHG goals as determined by the City or project proposers. Project proposers may also explore additional sustainability measures such as examples listed in Section i above to reduce operational emissions to the extent practicable. The proposed developments would be constructed in compliance with state regulations and city building codes. 4 Envision Shakopee. Shakopee 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Updated by the City of Shakopee 2019. Accessed 22 August 2025 and available at https://cld.bz/6IkEdse/368/. SRF 354 i O L V co -o 4-• V a) �O a nformation a) O 0 L O I i (13 a) a) CD U U CtINI v) a) ct U O (a 0 O §. a) oi a) U L co (13 E 0 0 O co z z 0 z -45 a) a) 0 0 0 O a) 0 Q �Iv a) a) a) L a) E 0 a) TD Q C 0 F- 0 Co a) . O L Q U a) E E 0 1 Co U) -▪ o -o Co a) 7 a) CNr) si (/) Subp. 36, Land use conversion, including golf courses Project Name Project Category (primary Project Category (secondary Location (County Cn Building Construction Project? uu - M O C3) co CO CO CO N N - ILO ILO ILO N N CO N 1.0 Construction Start Date Operational Year Operational Lifetime (Years U) C O U 0) C O 0) C6 U O_ co > co -o co O 0) C a) ca 0) co U 0) Q 0 0 C O C -o co 0 0) cc U) 0 O co Co N rt It It It 463,000.0 O O CO M 4- 4 Cr a) L a) L 4- a,aa La Cl) L 'a go Q C.) a m m S:12 m c .O }' L ca O = d d S m T 7co co L- a) a) 7 Electricity Provider a) O L a) Q O c a) I.f. CO 0 a) a) a) O u cell] O fi � V O C. • W . d d W CM CD O m N 45 s C) C L • cl-O d Portion of Building Natural Gas Consumption to be Supplied from Renewable Sources V) a) C.) s- 0". a) a) O O Please specify the preferred unit in which to present emissions in the Results tab. O O _N � N ,0 0 N N ,U N O) O- U N i z O O O � O O , = - z , -0)Q) O = L O -4-, 4O Q. O 0) Ca o 2 co o (13 .0 0 N Q. N a3 2 O Ca $P.,N O CO Ca Ci) Q Uco O • CO z O ,2 ,� E O o 5 O O cu - U 2 U Q 0) Q O N v) CB '� 0 N Include Emission Applicable to Project Phase Emission Source Source? Project Category? Cl) >_ N N N N Cl) O >_ >_ >_ >_ >_ z O z O z >_ O z >_ O z O z >- O z N >_>_>_>_>_>_ N N N N N O z O z O z>_ O z>_ O z O z O z O z Construction Material inputs Construction Transportation of material inputs Construction Employee commuting Construction Construction equipment Construction Land use change (construction) Construction Construction waste Operation Building energy consumption Operation Coal production Operation Natural gas and oil products Operation Industrial processes Operation HFC leakage Operation Land use change (operations) Operation On -road vehicles Operation Treatment of waste on -site Operation Treatment of wastewater on -site Operation Treatment of waste off -site Operation Enteric fermentation Operation Manure management av O v H ca QJ ca 0 Coal Production a A Employee Commuting Construction Phase To V C 1-E O O C, Unknown Domestic oltsawoa uMouNuf uMOUNuf uMouNuf uMouNuf uMouNuf uMouNuf c g C C C it C C C C C C R 3 a 766.00 4,293.00 6,050.00 106,160.00 2,217.00 1,154.00 674.00 8,353.00 19,435.00 a) a Aluminum Asphalt Glass Insulation (residential) Insulation (commercial) Steel Wood Products H C� C a> N U U O m U Construction Stage O E m N 0_ N CD O U F c U 31 c O R � a O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 R L y v =1 Eo EU 41 c c m � O U 3 m O O O, O N W o O O O O O N o0 a> O c ROOOO�OOcoOOOcoC°,°O 'L^ V C O i O i a in O O O O O O O O O O O N O coN, O c 0 •p E N 0 O O. O N o O O O O O 0 0 0 3 i E. NOOOO0000C°,°,°oOOO R d J L N V C � •4 20 vU Q I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c O r O 211 y 2 i U m o C.) O O O, O N m O O O O O O N co O ii 2 • C 3 R xO L g 0 a, 0 0 0 0 0 0 ao O O O ao ( O t Z .. L EL a 45 O O O O O O O O O O O N O O C 0 p E d 0 o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O as y, 1— 7 LL m m 2cn N N 0 0 m m N 2 N N 0 0 m m N N N N 0 0 m m)7 N N N N 0 0 m N N N 0 0 m m (n (A N N 0 0 m m m N N N N N N 0 0 0 a H C d .5 W Air Compressors Cement and Mortar Mixers Concrete/Industrial Saws Cranes Excavators Forklifts Generator Sets Graders Pavers Paving Equipment Rollers Rubber Tired Dozers Scrapers Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Welders Defaults are only applicable to building construction projects. Values are dependent on the number of project acres. O w 3 N ) N mO a 204.40 415.00 o o O q., O °9 000, iE O O O O O O O O O O O 552.90 0.00 QO 0 V O O O O O � O O i U a vor� O- N v v ti8.c aoo 0000rn0g'0N 000c0 0 0 0 0 Cfl O a Wetlands, forested Wetlands, not forested Forest Rivers and streams Brush and grassland Cropland Livestock rangeland/pastureland Lawn/landscaping Green Infrastructure: Constructed wetlands, paved Green Infrastructure: Constructed wetlands, vegetated Green Infrastructure: Constructed green roofs Green Infrastructure: Constructed permeable pavements Impervious surface Stormwater pond (wet sedimentation basin) H N N g C O J • E Number of mature trees removed Number of new trees planted Loss Rate (%) O e, O O O O O O O O O O O O E F Q Q 92 �ti a - Operational Phase \ % \ \ / E / E 6 E \ � $ \ 7 / / \ / '5 \ - wE 2. '15 'S a'5 \ k % \ . 2 / a $ 9 0-7') a a) a) O Z Enter notes into the yellow cells below to document assumptions, data sources, notes for reviewers, special circumstances, or other helpful information specific to your project, if desi O U) N L co 0- U) Q Q Q L() co co N ii 45 0_ m m N L co m 0- U) Q Q IC) N O N cm a) • z co 4• 2 C N U L (B C U) U) .C Q n Q Q Ln M r Q 4 r C N � C E Q O 41.5 co 0 D U) .N co C a FD U) O o_ co C U) L F- a) C 0 m •C O L -( L O U co LL C O .N L U) C 0 0 N 0) C .U) Q) _c U ca U N L a) U) co • 02 42 2 L L U 0- 0 _C Q -0 Q C co _U) Q (o (Y) U I6 E • U Construction Average material inputs for one 2,500 square foot home: 60 tons concrete, 15 tons wood, 3 tons aspallt, 3 tons steel, 3 tons brick, 1 ton glass, 1 ton insulation, 0.5 ton aluminum. Average material inputs for Commercial Building: 0.04 tn/sf concrete, 0.003 tn/sf wood, 0.001 tn/sf asphalt, 0.005 tn/sf steel, 0.004 tn/sf brick, 0.0015 tn/sf glass, 0.0009 tn/sf insulation, 0.00025 tn/sf aluminum. 84 acres of new development. Assumed 21 acres (one-fourth) from brush/grassland and 63 acres (three -fourths) from cropland. No differentiation between open water and stormwater ponds. U) C .— cc E C a.+ E a- ._ C o ++ c. w ice+ N C o fa Eoo m C U)ci o ' cc ca I 2 L o a cn co H c W U cn J N V Operation Building energy consumption .2 ). o o_ 7O c ca V -a caw O o U 2 L 13 17 z Summary Results (Step 4b) Cumulative and annualized GHG emissions are shown for all applicable emission sources in the table below. Results are calculated using AR5 global warming potentials and are shown in short tons, metric tons, or kilograms based on the unit selected in the Project Background tab. Emission sources indicated as not applicable in the Project Background tab that are excluded from the calculations are listed below. Emission sources excluded from alculations and hidden below: Coal production, Natural gas and oil products, Industrial processes, Land use change (operations), Treatment of waste on -site, Treatment of wastewater on -site, Treatment of waste off -site, Enteric fermentationmii Lifetime Emissions Go to Charts Go to Operation Generate Summary Report Unit: MEM Project Lifetime: Mal Phase Cumulative CO2e Emissions Annualized CO2e Emissions Construction 166,999.46 3,036.35 Material inputs 55,361.25 1,006.57 Transportation of material inputs 2,287.68 41.59 Employee commuting 10,049.57 182.72 Construction equipment 99,026.08 1,800.47 Land use change (construction) 11.74 0.21 Construction waste 263.14 4.78 Operation 1,563,940.88 28,435.29 Building energy consumption 1,280,887.63 23,288.87 HFC leakage 113,601.75 2,065.49 On -road vehicles 169,451.51 3,080.94 Total 1,730,940.35 31,471.64 Emissions Equivalencies To contextualize emissions, input emissions data into the ..P4 ('HG (using corresponding units) to convert emissions into equivalent measures for communication purposes. Below are some example equivalencies for both cumulative and annualized emissions. Cumulative emissions are equivalent to... Emissions from Emissions from Emissions avoided by 3,995,630,243 176,694,350 554,870 Annualized emissions are equivalent to... Emissions from Emissions from Carbon sequestered by miles driven by an average gasoline -powered passenger vehicle gallons of gasoline consumed tons of waste recycled instead of landfilled 6,655 gasoline -powered passenger vehicles driven for one year 3,832 homes' energy use for one year 28,551 acres of U.S. forests in one year 362 Q -o 4-• V a) �O a nformation L O I i (13 a) a) CD 4_ U U E a) ct U O (a 0 O §. a) a) U s- 0 (13 ccs O 0 0 a) a) 0 0 0 O co a) 0 Q �Iv a) a) O co a) L a) E 0 TD a) Q C 0 F- 0 Co a) .O L Q U a) E E 0 I Co U) co Co a) 7 a) CNr) si (/) Subp. 36, Land use conversion, including golf courses 0 (I) Project Name Project Category (primary Project Category (secondary Location (County U) Building Construction Project? uu - M O C3) co 00 CO CO N N — ILO ILO ILO N N CO N Construction Start Date Operational Year Operational Lifetime (Years U) C O U C) C O 0) U O_ cc > C O 0) C co a) co 0 co U 0) Q 0 0 C O C -oC 0 0) co co O oi'I-1. rt 4 4::tt It lt 'I-1. It It �,aa �c��a�CD L V a 'O °- O ,_ ca a) 'a m ''' 2:ci a) ...._ - i �_ m 5 L E O La C ii � m To 4(I) C ,_ a) L 5 m co C O S. C 4- Cl) Q E -a 5 L- ♦"' 0) a) 7 C9 Electricity Provider Portion of Building Natural Gas Consumption to be Supplied from Renewable Sources Please specify the preferred unit in which to present emissions in the Results tab. O O _N � N ,0 0 N N ,U N O) O- U N i z O O O � O O , = - z , -0)Q) O = L O -4-, 4O Q. O 0) Ca o 2 co o (13 .0 0 N Q. N a3 2 O Ca $P.,N O CO Ca Ci) Q Uco O • CO z O ,2 ,� E O o 5 O O cu - U 2 U Q 0) Q O N v) CB '� 0 N Include Emission Applicable to Project Phase Emission Source Source? Project Category? Cl) >_ N N N N Cl) O >_ >_ >_ >_ >_ z O z O z >_ O z >_ O z O z >- O z N >_>_>_>_>_>_ N N N N N O z O z O z>_ O z>_ O z O z O z O z Construction Material inputs Construction Transportation of material inputs Construction Employee commuting Construction Construction equipment Construction Land use change (construction) Construction Construction waste Operation Building energy consumption Operation Coal production Operation Natural gas and oil products Operation Industrial processes Operation HFC leakage Operation Land use change (operations) Operation On -road vehicles Operation Treatment of waste on -site Operation Treatment of wastewater on -site Operation Treatment of waste off -site Operation Enteric fermentation Operation Manure management O v H ca ca 0 Coal Production a A Employee Commuting Construction Phase T.., C LL t. O C, Unknown Domestic oltsawoa uMouNuf uMOUNuf uMouNuf uMouNuf uMouNuf uMouNuf c C C C C C C C C C Z. R 0 a 2,412.00 12,107.00 25,829.00 285,910.00 O O O O 6 C,-3 a O N 5,013.00 40,861.00 46,157.00 a H C� C Aluminum Asphalt m N Y U U O m U Glass Insulation (residential) Insulation (commercial) Steel Wood Products Construction Stage O E N N 0_ CD U C U C, Transportation Mode ti Sinale Occupancy Vehicle 0 CO rn g. ft � Rs - R c o R I O O O O O O O O O O O O R L v y � s o E 41 c c m � O U 3 m 0 0 0 f� O N W o O O O O O N of a> O E c ROOOO�OOooOOOaoC°,°O 'L^ V C O i O i a in O O O O O O O O O O O N O p O O p E N 0 O O oo O N O O O O O O 0 0 0 i En NOOOOOOOOC°,°,°OOOO q L N V C � •4 mo vU l'`' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c O r O 211 y 2 i U m o U O O O, O N m O O O O O O N N O d k 2 C 3 R xO L g 0 a, 0 0 0 0 0 0 co O O O co ( O t Z .4 L d a 45 O O O O O O O O O O O N O p O C O p E d 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 as y, 1— 7 LL m m N N 22 0 0 m m N 2 N N 0 0 m m 2 (n N N 0 0 m m)7 (n (n N N 0 0 m (n (n N N 0 0 m m () (A N N 0 0 m m m (p (p (n N N N 0 0 0 Als C d .5 W Air Compressors Cement and Mortar Mixers Concrete/Industrial Saws Cranes Excavators Forklifts Generator Sets Graders Pavers Paving Equipment Rollers Rubber Tired Dozers Scrapers Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Welders Defaults are only applicable to building construction projects. Values are dependent on the number of project acres. i 3 C N mO a QO 0 V O i� U a 204.40 415.00 o N' o 0 O O 0° O o 0 O O 0 0 O O 1,882.70 0.00 O q. 0 O LnN� N v N. s O O V 0 0 , M (+�j00000 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 2 O v 0 N Q H N N g C O J Wetlands, forested Wetlands, not forested Forest Rivers and streams Brush and grassland Cropland Livestock rangeland/pastureland Lawn/landscaping Green Infrastructure: Constructed wetlands, paved Green Infrastructure: Constructed wetlands, vegetated Green Infrastructure: Constructed green roofs Green Infrastructure: Constructed permeable pavements Impervious surface Stormwater pond (wet sedimentation basin) E Z Number of mature trees removed Number of new trees planted 2 Loss Rate (%) N C O r c 4 O O O O O ti O O O O O O E F Q Q 92 �ti a - Operational Phase \ % \ \ / E / E 6 E \ � $ \ 7 / / \ / '5 \ - wE 2. '15 'S a'5 \ k % \ � . 2 k \ $ 9 0-7') a a) co a) O Z Enter notes into the yellow cells below to document assumptions, data sources, notes for reviewers, special circumstances, or other helpful information specific to your project, if desi To. O N N N L WU U) O O LO N CO O L ii .C 45 0 N N N L co m 09- c) O c.i. O N re calculated using the Conversion Factors outlined in the Transporation Analysis Update. 2 N > `� t (a N 7 i'Dc= U (B (n g -2 .. 0 U) O O D . N.-.. CO N O -0 N _M N (a (� tB N ii U . . N , T O D o O O U ct U Construction Average material inputs for one 2,500 square foot home: 60 tons concrete, 15 tons wood, 3 tons aspallt, 3 tons steel, 3 tons brick, 1 ton glass, 1 ton insulation, 0.5 ton aluminum. Average material inputs for Commercial Building: 0.04 tn/sf concrete, 0.003 tn/sf wood, 0.001 tn/sf asphalt, 0.005 tn/sf steel, 0.004 tn/sf brick, 0.0015 tn/sf glass, 0.0009 tn/sf insulation, 0.00025 tn/sf aluminum. 1,445 acres of new development. Assumed new development is from brush/grassland, cropland, and livestock rangeland/pastureland. U) C .— co C E C o ++ C) 46 C =._ E m w En C N co o fa oo c cm o ' cc I L cm cuw c Vic N ca 2 as H E U J V Operation Building energy consumption .2 V.i So o 7O c is O o U 2 L 13 17 z Summary Results (Step 4b) Cumulative and annualized GHG emissions are shown for all applicable emission sources in the table below. Results are calculated using AR5 global warming potentials and are shown in short tons, metric tons, or kilograms based on the unit selected in the Project Background tab. Emission sources indicated as not applicable in the Project Background tab that are excluded from the calculations are listed below. Emission sources excluded from alculations and hidden below: Coal production, Natural gas and oil products, Industrial processes, Land use change (operations), Treatment of waste on -site, Treatment of wastewater on -site, Treatment of waste off -site, Enteric fermentationmii Lifetime Emissions Go to Charts Go to Operation Generate Summary Report Unit: MEM Project Lifetime: Mal Phase Cumulative CO2e Emissions Annualized CO2e Emissions Construction 314,745.60 5,722.65 Material inputs 196,891.04 3,579.84 Transportation of material inputs 7,918.63 143.98 Employee commuting 10,049.57 182.72 Construction equipment 99,026.08 1,800.47 Land use change (construction) 193.83 3.52 Construction waste 666.45 12.12 Operation 7,207,327.16 131,042.31 Building energy consumption 6,576,722.49 119,576.77 HFC leakage 290,934.41 5,289.72 On -road vehicles 339,670.26 6,175.82 Total 7,522,072.76 136,764.96 Emissions Equivalencies To contextualize emissions, input emissions data into the P4 ('HG (using corresponding units) to convert emissions into equivalent measures for communication purposes. Below are some example equivalencies for both cumulative and annualized emissions. Cumulative emissions are equivalent to... Emissions from Emissions from Emissions avoided by 17,363,637,885 767,853,009 2,411,276 Annualized emissions are equivalent to... Emissions from Emissions from Carbon sequestered by miles driven by an average gasoline -powered passenger vehicle gallons of gasoline consumed tons of waste recycled instead of landfilled 28,921 gasoline -powered passenger vehicles driven for one year 16,654 homes' energy use for one year 124,071 acres of U.S. forests in one year 370 i O L V co -o 4-• V a) �O a nformation a) O 0 L O I L (13 a) a) CD U U E v) a) ct U O co 0 O §. a) oi a) U L co (13 E 0 0 O co z z 0 z -45 a) a) 0 0 0 O a) 0 Q �Iv a) a) a) . O L Q U a) E E 0 1 Co U) -▪ o -o Ca a) 7 a) CNr) (/) Subp. 36, Land use conversion, including golf courses Project Name Project Category (primary Project Category (secondary Location (County U) Building Construction Project? uu - M O C3) co CO CO CO N- N - kge ILO ILO ILO N N CO N 1.0 Construction Start Date Operational Year Operational Lifetime (Years Cn C O U C) C O a) C6 U O_ Ca > co co O 0) C a) Co 0 co U 0) Q 0 0 C O C -o 0 0) co co O c) C3) 00 N rt It * It It c) O O s C3) 07 It It It It It i i a)aa L C.) a .., •O Cl- To as a) 'a m }' -2), '7) 4- 0 i m L E E L C s co 1-1) 13 4 O - a, L a c m O S. fi) 4- Cl) as cp Q ., c = f.cu a) a) 7 C9 Electricity Provider a) O L co Q O a) CD I.f. CO O a) CD a) a) u • W O fi v O C. • W . d m a) d W cm CD O m N 45 s C) L E. O d Portion of Building Natural Gas Consumption to be Supplied from Renewable Sources V) a) C.) s- 0". a) a) O O Please specify the preferred unit in which to present emissions in the Results tab. O O _N � N ,0 0 N N ,U N O) O- U N i z O O O � O O , = - z , -0)Q) O = L O -4-, 4O Q. O 0) Ca o 2 co o (13 .0 0 N Q. N a3 2 O Ca $P.,N O CO Ca Ci) Q Uco O • CO z O ,2 ,� E O o 5 O O cu - U 2 U Q 0) Q O N v) CB '� 0 N Include Emission Applicable to Project Phase Emission Source Source? Project Category? Cl) >_ N N N N Cl) O >_ >_ >_ >_ >_ z O z O z >_ O z >_ O z O z >- O z N >_>_>_>_>_>_ N N N N N O z O z O z>_ O z>_ O z O z O z O z Construction Material inputs Construction Transportation of material inputs Construction Employee commuting Construction Construction equipment Construction Land use change (construction) Construction Construction waste Operation Building energy consumption Operation Coal production Operation Natural gas and oil products Operation Industrial processes Operation HFC leakage Operation Land use change (operations) Operation On -road vehicles Operation Treatment of waste on -site Operation Treatment of wastewater on -site Operation Treatment of waste off -site Operation Enteric fermentation Operation Manure management O ca ca O E LL Coal Production U A Employee Commuting N 2 L Construction Phase L LL O C, Unknown Domestic oltsawoa uMouNuf uMOUNuf uMouNuf uMouNuf uMouNuf uMouNuf c g ggggggggg 2,097.00 9,160.00 O 0 O O 6,133.00 2,918.00 000 R RA (3 .5P; N O O a Aluminum Asphalt Glass Insulation (residential) Insulation (commercial) Steel Wood Products H C� C m N Y U U 0 m U Construction Stage E N o_ CD O U P U N � Rs - R c o R � a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R L y v =1 � � s o E 41 � C' C' C' C• � C• C• C• C• C' C' Ct C' C' c c ',72„,,...,,,,,,,,,- m � O U 3 W O O O O O O N of a> O c R0000�000000oaoC°,°0 'L^ V C O i iiO a in O O O O O O O O O O N .coN, O O •p E N 0 O O o0 O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 i E. N000000ooC°,°,°0000 q L N 7 V C � •4 vU E,''' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c O E. O 211 y 2 i U m o C.) 0 0 0, o N m O O O O O O N co O ii , C 3 R xO L g 0 a, 0 0 0 0 0 0 co O O O co ( O t Z .. L EL a 45 O O O O O O O O O O O N O p O C O F. p E d 0 ............... as y, 1— 7 LL m m cc/I))cn N N 0 0 m m N 2 N N 0 0 m m N N N N 0 0 m m)7 N N N 0 0 m N U N N 0 0 m m (A N N 0 0 m m m N N N 0 0 0 H C d .5 W Air Compressors Cement and Mortar Mixers Concrete/Industrial Saws Cranes Excavators Forklifts Generator Sets Graders Pavers Paving Equipment Rollers Rubber Tired Dozers Scrapers Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Welders Defaults are only applicable to building construction projects. Values are dependent on the number of project acres. V 3 t N mO a 204.40 415.00 8 q 8. 4i"2 2. °o/O O O O O O O O O O 824.90 0.00 QO O V O O O O O � 0 0 ivor� O O v ao 00000 8 �+�j00000 0 0 0 0 0 rn 0g'0N 0 V a N 4 a Wetlands, forested Wetlands, not forested Forest Rivers and streams Brush and grassland Cropland Livestock rangeland/pastureland Lawn/landscaping Green Infrastructure: Constructed wetlands, paved Green Infrastructure: Constructed wetlands, vegetated Green Infrastructure: Constructed green roofs Green Infrastructure: Constructed permeable pavements Impervious surface Stormwater pond (wet sedimentation basin) H N N g C J • c E Number of mature trees removed Number of new trees planted Loss Rate (%) O O r c lf; O O O O m O O O O O O N co O O E F Q 3 Q 92 �ti a - Operational Phase \ % \ \ / E / E 6 E \ � $ \ 7 / / \ / '5 \ - wE 2. '15 'S a'5 \ k % \ . 2 5- ;-• $ 9 0-7') a a) a) O Z Enter notes into the yellow cells below to document assumptions, data sources, notes for reviewers, special circumstances, or other helpful information specific to your project, if desi co 0 D U) .N co c a O El L O 0 U) 0 LL U) L O N �--I N 2 L 3" O U O i O O U L(5 CO 0) LL N C I, II .N L L • O U o_ o Z. m 2 C U g n o- U) 2 O c, s I..' co N - • O N co N U Ti, S 0 C• AL; CO p O • - O -0 cr,N 0) p co co73 (o `. U .0 . . O N '7 E • E A`jN 0 -o O Q O U Construction Average material inputs for one 2,500 square foot home: 60 tons concrete, 15 tons wood, 3 tons aspallt, 3 tons steel, 3 tons brick, 1 ton glass, 1 ton insulation, 0.5 ton aluminum. Average material inputs for Commercial Building: 0.04 tn/sf concrete, 0.003 tn/sf wood, 0.001 tn/sf asphalt, 0.005 tn/sf steel, 0.004 tn/sf brick, 0.0015 tn/sf glass, 0.0009 tn/sf insulation, 0.00025 tn/sf aluminum. 356 acres of new development. Assumed 89 acres (one-fourth) from brush/grassland and 267 acres (three -fourths) from cropland. No differentiation between open water and stormwater ponds. U) C .- cc C C o ++ C) 45 =._ w N E m C ci o fa oo o U) o ' L cuw IC cc cri 2 a as H c E Vic U J N Operation Building energy consumption .2 V.i o a 7O C ca O o U 2 L 13 17 z Summary Results (Step 4b) Cumulative and annualized GHG emissions are shown for all applicable emission sources in the table below. Results are calculated using AR5 global warming potentials and are shown in short tons, metric tons, or kilograms based on the unit selected in the Project Background tab. Emission sources indicated as not applicable in the Project Background tab that are excluded from the calculations are listed below. Emission sources excluded from alculations and hidden below: Coal production, Natural gas and oil products, Industrial processes, Land use change (operations), Treatment of waste on -site, Treatment of wastewater on -site, Treatment of waste off -site, Enteric fermentationmii Lifetime Emissions Go to Charts Go to Operation Generate Summary Report Unit: Project Lifetime: Mal Phase Cumulative CO2e Emissions Annualized CO2e Emissions Construction 286,972.74 5,217.69 Material inputs 170,440.99 3,098.93 Transportation of material inputs 6,687.32 121.59 Employee commuting 10,049.57 182.72 Construction equipment 99,026.08 1,800.47 Land use change (construction) 49.74 0.90 Construction waste 719.05 13.07 Operation 8,806,435.54 160,117.01 Building energy consumption 8,310,913.70 151,107.52 HFC leakage 267,017.87 4,854.87 On -road vehicles 228,503.97 4,154.62 Total 9,093,408.29 165,334.70 Emissions Equivalencies To contextualize emissions, input emissions data into the P4 GHG (using corresponding units) to convert emissions into equivalent measures for communication purposes. Below are some example equivalencies for both cumulative and annualized emissions. Cumulative emissions are equivalent to... Emissions from 20,990,843,040 Emissions from 928,254,902 Emissions avoided by 2,914,983 Annualized emissions are equivalent to... Emissions from Emissions from Carbon sequestered by miles driven by an average gasoline -powered passenger vehicle gallons of gasoline consumed tons of waste recycled instead of landfilled 34,962 gasoline -powered passenger vehicles driven for one year 20,133 homes' energy use for one year 149,989 acres of U.S. forests in one year 378 Appendix J Agency Comments and Responses Jackson Township Development Area — AUAR Update IRF 379 SRF SRF Project No. 19234 From: Date: Subject: MEMORANDUM Mark Noble Senior Planner, Planning Division City of Shakopee Lydia Statz, AICP, Sustainable Planning Project Manager, SRF Consulting Jana Guseynova, Environmental Planning Project Manager, SRF Consulting Brent Clark, PE, Development & Urban Mobility Studies Project Manager, SRF Consulting 12/23/2025 Agency Comments and Responses on the Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update Agency Comments Received The following comment log includes a list of all comments received and responses. Agencies that sent letters to the City of Shakopee included: • Metropolitan Council (October 14, 2025) • Minnesota Department of Health (October 14, 2025) • Scott County Transportation Services Division (October 14, 2025) • Minnesota Department of Transportation (October 29, 2025) • Metropolitan Council — Objection Withdrawal (December 19, 2025) www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 I Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 1763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 380 O N N O rCN m N N N cN 01 Mark Noble City of Shakopee vt 0 - CC Comment V o. 0 H a--+ S.- +, c a) 0 -c a) O }, CL 0 SZ -0 a) a 0_ _ 0 0 p[ N Q m (U D L.) cB � CU C co O '0 - . +� te--+ • — a) F- 4- 4- a) 4- 0 4- 0 -C15 2 E O Council will not take formal action on the V) a) •cn 0 O v .O Q C ≥ V C a) 0 -c 0_ C a, a CU o_ cu a o 0 cn N CU > cn - O U C C N 1z +-' 0) Z 4) cc o a) a --IS .� a) 5, ,F) szT) • -G, "z5 Q L CU Q CU +-' N N v) O S Si,' ' a) 0 C LL p� 0 a, E z � � o 0 Q � � � Q, • ii - 0 E o•=�z a,�Q q)CL Ln a E a)<sa) °.'mss ��ss cm LI- Z .4-' ...Z Q.) LD ..,Z • Z....., ...§ L. O m E o L. N Cr a' ' _' V Q ow 0.) CU .O 0 .,_ N1Z%Ct) v � .� Q > N •-� . :4:-1 .14 (f) ca +�-' O_ - Z Oa. 0 U N 0 z •_ L OC O ,— N c O N Q — ° C : D E O a) a, (T3° a) m -0 O D 0 a) 0 3 Q Q N D> c6 (U a) C C - - Q> • 0 .0) 0 c6 ca C -0 0 - — •— D V O O m '— pC a>, O OO Q D 0 § v) Q cn a) U — 0 0 co C C u a) V }' L) 0 N aC --+ (U a) c0 ate--, O •5 O a v, •> U c No a, o a) •U a) a) O N � N ate-' •� 61 E E N ("• 6 C -C 0 N a) N a) � N O O .D - O U a✓ a) co v LE O N O M v 2 4- U a) 4- a) 0 a) a) a� 0 0 4- a� CU a� a) 0 cc C 0 CU a� a) a� 0 0 C 0 a) a) 4- E a) 0 a) a) a� a) 0 E O 0 Q a) ca ca a) 4— a) CN CN O .c DC C Ol 4' O a) 0 0 a) a--' a� 4— a) 4— V 0 C u LE a) u a--' CN CN O O M N L.) c6 2 did not adhere to Minn. a) a) N L_ 0_ a) O a- U a� 4- a✓ a) a� 0 V 0 C a) C 0 ca 0 N O u -o C CU .E c s O •D .q O -C > m a� a� CU r - ca ca a) N W O_ —I—, L.) C rs.r) (7) —C a) a) ra cu _≥ u Q CO = C • ' 0 *i c% Q O Q O O o a, D 0_ CU -I- 73 , Q (U 4-< s N V ca N M O < a) O v)i— V Q O 2 D '— .O 4- C O O M O V .cn Q (U c6 N a) .73: .11(1)— a� O — Q u Mo pC . �' D a) a) C • D V) 0 N oC 4) r6 C Q C, C Q.) Q C ca c6 Q7:3 all a) . - c E O_ a) a) .0) o N U }' _O _c 76 C C>1:1 O > C O V .C '' - C c6 s_ v 4—.- O o N s 0 Of O a)O .C a) a) V O c6 .� co .� +�-, C% U C ( a) a✓ F a) CL a� C a) E o o O a) E > a) a) D v) C a✓ 0 = o u a✓ � a) o V C a✓ O • o u a✓ � a) o V Mark Noble City of Shakopee vt 0 o_cu Comment Z a-' C Z Q No Ct p< ° 0 Zs .O +-, < •Ln O ca O Q � .C_ E .o ° E 0 °) O }' a) O s E .: a) s (1)Z O }' >, ,z3 E 2 —g. O' 'Q ca _' .- N v, . 0 u Co Q.,v, L. (I) P 1:3 7 eL a S s v .-s. —5-..< z ,z. 03 Q Q o E >s o OL a) CL�v E- U O 0) 73 E Co Q O (13 a) L_ a) a) a) -o O a) 4- a) C v 0 vi ca 0 Q E V VI OIM .O a C Nos Q C +-, O I —v 5 -0 u .. a N Q C §E v) CU ca a) < D a3 ._ N Q C o a a) I- O a) > u CC C -0 a) a) Q C o (13 -0 a) 0-D a3o E a) 0 Q ,— c c a) Oa) cu s v) a) a) _c 4--, a) Co _0 v) Co Cu s v.)C o s a) . u Co a) a--+ n, v) = a) V C N v) 0) Q CU D s O C ca _C O I- U ca Q u C u 4- Co a--� c/) 4- ca ca ca C .03 O CU 4- 03 Co v s a) >, C ca C .0) 0 C .C 0 O E o O •� U m d- o C L DC M C U L ca •C a) E D C E D a) a) N no ca CU rc3 C 0 c OC +-, .7) E O O (13 a) o "' V) ca (Du i +Jr%) cum X Ln Q D Q C cu D +-' D U O N Q - ' ci, I N 4_ N I- -0 ,_ E U 0 previously planned. C 75 CU 03 N Co>� },� L.) _ CD C a) 0 a) — 03 U -o c:a c •5 4- a) •v) ca m C C CLDoo)z s Q O a) - E Q a) a) Q U C s a) o E O D Q v +-' C •'� O E `n N N U 0 N • i N _C > CU v) oD }'c fa E≥'°C0-00 O 0 'j N }, O E o O -,,DV) Co m > Ou C U N }' a) t C- C Co Q v) a) O s_ a) . _ a) V) C O CU u s a) ,_ a) O 0 .O O >, a) a) 'no 0 0 CC a -I-, I- .2 C 7 N D O CCU N _Co }' Ou ca < 0 can v Q a) O O O 0 V Co 0 O a� a) 2 a) a✓ 0 a) s a✓ (13 Co ar E O z O 4- U a) a� a) a✓ O 73 ca ca 03 O m N Co 4- a 4- a) 03 O O 4- O U 4- 4- O ca u Co a) C a) CU a✓ O Co u O O Co L.) Co L.) 4- 4 - a) a) O O .v) Co a- O O referenced. CC CO ca a) Co Q v_' O-0 N O rrj u cn z Q Q ID ca + u oc C D 4- (3) N < p N V) O 0 u D +_' O c< N C o O 4- rJj a) v) O MC - ate--' -O CU cu Co , u a) CU _0 0 a3 a) _0 cn O U • U • LA u a) Co s73 E a) DC 4 0 N Co O U Co .C +' OC CL O O n3 CU CU CU 0 •_ O 0 C v) }' — a) p .ocm CU > a) ca -0 Q 0 > N N C C O < E o 4- can Ou O U CoCC/ Vi - .L a) Co cu D 0 O a) C 0 a) 4 O 0 C a O CU i 03 w C 0 > a),_ >,22 0- E 0- a, O s_ a) v) }, O o a) '- u O •ro v) o O o C DU N a) >, . v) Ol QC • - ro a) ca N 0 ` D C O a) < 'c7 u .C N i _C C C C v +- : a) 03 C p u 3 O Co O C V) O +-' v) a) > .C cc Co 4- 0 C C D 4 a✓ N N Q v) u O 0 O 0 a) 73 •• O co 2 O N N NO L.. - M t N N O1 10- Mark Noble City of Shakopee 0 0_ cu CC a--, cn c 7:2 1E MT D c6 a) - ra a--, V N +J aC ra ro ra > Q D D a) C a ' � oc O o O L._ Q - Q . r6 0 ca Q O O t C -o 4 4 a) O O C O . v, �, > a) Q :+-+ C ate--+ C D c VI Vi O ra O O E -0 03 >> .V X -0 C CU U cU N N Jfu N v, ra _ Q c N a) .D }, V) C a) 4-1 I- 4 >, w c cv = c a) 'L-- O -o o - a) u a) X- O V ca O . ID N C CD •LE CU if) > cu CU - ,� 0 -0 Q V _ i a) C O CD N p O 2 E CD Q o o u- C a� a-=, Item/Section 11 An additional detailed measure has also rD 0 O 4- ai a) 4- 2 been added to the v, CU U 0 Q N O O 0 O X N Q Q .C -o a) a) cu N EL) ru VI -o fu E a-, a) E O >cu a) C .E cu al 0 0 7.3 C 03 C a) ai a) 4- cu a-, .0 cu -,--, co ce Q D Q O cu .> 4) 7 .> -o .C co cu a) C (13 0_ a) 2 � U v, D MT L E 0 4) L V D O V +, .C MT 4- a, C CU CD C C Q _ N O N _o > co 0s N O 73 0 s 4) 0 N E a) 4- ) cD O CD O X 0_ Q Q CD 0_ O .4- -R, 2 4- O a) 73 r6 rs 0 ca ai a) a, :> E 4C N 4D C > N ca 0 - 4) N E CU N U X 73 L a) O O a) 4-, L_ CU N _C O -o -o U }, ( C C O Em -c O � VI C cu" 73 N N D n. a3 _ cu a) 73 O vi • — a) CD a, v, a) F- C 4 .C -0 v' J •- ca O a) 4 a) 0— a) D c) C a) C Q ' No o • — rn •v, ra CU p Q a) O `~ w 72 Cr CD E E +-, N O N E ti)O cu c O N C 2 W N D r6 1) .+71 -I-, O V C M C E_o_0 }' v, Q ro N co : _ � N Qa) CU 0-0 •: C o a) E cu > al -E a) E - . C 0 -C a) Q) CD r6 -I-, C •O D OO N CD CD .X < CI c0 v) E ca a J- (CT E• C p v) rD ca C 4 C O co p cp _c +-+ C c6 N ca •DI U E C C - O � � � Q o o 4- a) •}, a) Q a) CD D C a) ( L a) E a) ra a) ra c I L -n v, a) ra I' L7 N O CI 73._ +I-+ O D CD -(f) ED 4- fu 4- a) a) L_ a) 73 co U O v, a L_ ro 4 - CD O 0 cu -o .C CD E v, p� D I- < 4- a) C C 4- a, >s a) CDCUate -+ a) E al O r6 73 V ai E V D E N •X ") O ca E O c6 a) Q— C o a) -,--, Q E ! O 4 LA O O • O r6 a3 a) E 0 .C a) 0 a7, ac) a✓ Q cu 4- v, cu v, ca >5 4- D CU 4- s 4- .O C v 0 CD -o C 4- v, E cu D ce a D Q 4 - vi a✓ CD Q ._ O cu 4- L., 0 4- N E O 73> E .E CD E cu a--+ a✓ cu -ci O L To V)C a) a) a) m �' o E � cnszu � 1 a✓ c -g W a) O }, .2 03 - E CE LE s •O '' v, - Q +-, c6 ( Q O >, > c cu •> 0 O 5 N 4 c6 73 ° CLA 0' v' a, .- E 15 O `) 4-,E O }, CC Q -C o •- -I-,I-> s '� c6 � DC N }' I }, > 4, Q a-, 73 CZ O s +' C 0- cu N .- aV) 4 •� O —O DC V v, C a) > < .w E O - a) D ° °C .vi O Q CD N : Q N-0 N r, O 4- O I CU U V) VI U 0 - c ra 0 aU s v, ca 4- ii > v, O ce Q D Q s 4- 7 a) ate-, O N IN O r CN O Ml -r) N CU N O1 d Mark Noble City of Shakopee Comment o I— w al review or AUAR update is needed). -0 LI CU .O C O C a) +, E c6 V C V, .O te N C a-, a) •aC -o > D "3 0 .V) C O c vI > - a) 0 a) C N a� a) VI a) ca -0 D C 0 N 0 CU N _C E -_CD > CU OM - 0) N C3:0 � N � � .V = 0 Q - C C C �' CI) O .X L �-o L ca .C . a) a) a) N O V) V N CCU Q N CU CU cu 0 ate--+ LI C C _ E Q F o d - CD N- Z- 4- 2CO 0 V) C .D CO CO 2 vI LI C ca a--+ V) CU (0 V) C CU 0 — CU oC Q D Q N M a) r6 � E CU O o a-' a) Q •c cz o v a-, _C CU . O v' 0 N 00 aw C 73 O 4-, a) aJ 0 v) o_ (Da) +-a C IA- -I-, C a) (0 cu -o a) cu a-, C .� CU a-, Q cu F 0 a-, a s_ 75 ai no ru a, O C c0 ra +a') vi .LI >, co V 4- 4— +_, vI co c0 (0 C 0 c LE C 73 c E CU E • L.5 -O ,..- T1 03 1.1) CU Li -05 CU 0 , C E 2 cN or allowed under the land use of cu x 0 cu U -o cu C CU 0 0- 0 (13 cu co vi 0 (0 Li cc cU C 0 Li CU SD 0 CU > c6 LI .V CU ai CU 0- 0 C cu U 4 - co 4- C no C CU fu TD ru TD O N N O rCN 0 m D NJ CU N O1 Mark Noble City of Shakopee vt 0 0- CL Comment V .- 0- 0 I- a) al a An additional detailed measure has also been added to the v) aJ a) C c6 O O Q C +-' O N ' L - R3 L- 2 o 0 O X E Q Q .C a) -o aJ v N N a) -o CU F E F O _ aJ a) C C .F aJ -o O O N aJ 4- a) 4-1 cn 4- -o Q D Q a) ra O a) .> a) ca 7 .> C . a) a) a) aJ >'+ C U D O C O N +-' +' E Oa O v� Q -o Li N C - N c�a CD S 'U N V) C � C N a) O ID O - U O S a--' V a -0O CU m a) ca *+7, _ c.4 •0O aJ co Q N o ) o F 73 •v +-' U c Z D }, 2 c •> C o o E- U ._ V ca cC Q D Q a) O U 0 v 0 s_ Q ca C E C a) o : a--' C V cm cn I. _ > U _0 .a) O -0 a) Q Q I. O c -o 22 (0 a) cc Q D Q -0 (13 •O •� Q O � O CN I- O L N O •� _c c a) ra 2 > a) sp i- a)a) O � NJ _0 O N a-, dl V) f3 V COM a) C -0 C Q s_ D O Q C � O N ii coce }, w c a) c in •— U a) te C a__, a) -o h. ro I N O s_ Q cC Q D Q C CM O CU I V) -o 4— O -o (13 _ U CU V) a) O C v CA .D co s +-' .C v) C s 4— C. LA C a--' a) -o a) a) 4— L.) 'O Q U AUARs are meant to be an alternate form of +-' >, c cn ca a) a) C c -o = Q N a"cu o) a) a) CU Ct5 (i.,(13 41: E 735 § = O V) r aJ +sa O -C ca �1 — .— > Q •— O O c6 v O F Q •`—' C °° O X Q ca v s ca Or — ca +-' �' D . — _c -0 L a)a) < '. w O (AD a) •— N v c V- w Q N C a) X OcX3 o a Q F aJ cu O V) C Q 4-1 O O N O O Q O Ce D V C (1) ow ca ra I QQ Q V • N a.)Q < - 0_0 w aJ V Q ra caID O CD }' a) }' s +� Q O QCO 4— O . C5 'AD .C5 E O O� 8 _2 N O O a) F a) O Q Q V ca v) -0 (AU cn < Q (0 a) O cz O 4- U a) -o ca .C O U a) a--+ CU O 4- 4— ca F a) .4- L.) L_ ro -o O Q N 4— L_ 4- O 4- C 4- L_ O O c6 t. co VI . .C O U CU > ID c6 CU aJ Q a) v) a) DC C 2 O 4— cu L_ Q ce Q D Q CU +-' O C O +-- Li •- O V) CD C ca O) C O 0 a) O -o a) (13 Ln Q cn O LO O a) 4— aJ V) LE . -o aJ C O C O CO -5 v .V a) O O cn O N IN O r CNI Cr) - N CU 01 d Mark Noble City of Shakopee 0 vt - CU CC Comment V 0- 0 V more formal 0 C +� v) Q) C 0 0 (� Q a) v) a--' � N cu (6 - - C O .c - 4--, +, �C 0 § O ra U 0 4-1 a) a) a)cu 2 '> O vi i V L._u Q) (6 O C L) Q _ c .0 0 0_ C u s_ c6 O O _c Uu +-1 +-, a) C a) ate--+ a--+ a--+ a) a--+ v LE CU E 0 z a) v) a) ate--+ O a) > a) ra F 0 (0 a) a) 0 whether Met Council will withdraw the 0 4- L.) 0 CU a) -0 4— o C O o - C > +� (6 o F c O O c _o a) O t (6 c }, a) o 0 -o (74SS 4S a) C u (� (6 C Q 0 -0 oC u 0_ •O Q E CI) G) E inconsistent data for review. c C 0 .— O a) ate-+ _ ate--+ LI-N ' L +�-+ Q) ate+ (6 U +-, -0 (6 >1 U • — Q CI C LA U u c a 7 in N 073 v,7a) o +, a) O a) a) a) — a)ft5 v) - U a) - N O — '� t.) v,—cn +� •— cn a� - O u Q (�a) _O- ' (0 c6 a� O `� 4- c a) °' (a 0 a) C D O +-+ O <O`� te--+ }' 0 O Q 4- O CU O (6 (6 a) C C C C a3 0 +d ' E -Ccij CU § >N v) c u _C a) E E cu cicu g o_ a) -c cu qT- , 2 ai '— vui Q DC O }' >, p •— a)L - 4—C u 0 E 0_ r6 a) a) . E '4C Q c a) oc a) C • v, U a) >, a--+ 4-, cu CU }' ≥ O P P O -0 v) Q — . > • c E -O a) -o cu 'x no 4 E a) Q o cu ca C u +J -C — u O a) N— O Eu > O E D > E u }, Q) Q 05 a - cn (a a) L DI cnro O ra Q -O -O u C+ C N > a +J v N cC3 cn -0 u C O " >, u a) a) C >, V cu CD C Cs U CU CU . Ecf 7:373, 7..)C to_ ,:j ray) ro (6 C CUD C)- S ' ffiN O Q X v) -0 'ate +, Q a) . � N : p : u, OO u 'cn N Q CO E° •E O� 73-C O a) vvi 'v) a) a) > Q 0 O vui > u OUaJ C Qucn r6 C C O CU CU I--O-O Q U - ro-O Q -O 0 v) O I- Qu � +�-+ can I- C Mark Noble City of Shakopee vt 0 cu 0- Comment V 0- 0 cn >_ U L D C cn s a) Q CU U CU c +' O a) u Q O oC Q D a) cu F a--� a) 4- L 0_ >, -o a) CT ca (13 0 a) (13 s +-� N E L.) -o L 4- (13 0 (13 4- E 0 • — L.) E 4- O .C a) a--+ Q 0 .C a) ca (13 0 L -o aJ aJ L 0 CC 4- ca vi 0 4- co •E 0 L Q (13 L_ -o _o .a) L a) � 4, s C L -a O E c6 L cu c6 E D O D DIU C•O ,L_ CU> v) 0- C ca a) 'v, L aW. ) a) -o 'v) cu a) o •O_ 'w v) Cl 4- a) (13 CU Q D U s "'cc% o_ Di— c a) a) a) 0 .� � Q 0� � D— C o -o +-� a) .+,(:)c — +-� 2 < •cU N LLJ co N Q c> cn ' - vs a) 4- E .o E_CD U 0D Q Q a) L D c6 > . C ) L a) a > i vi - C C s O a) C • O7 ca a) 0 +-,L 4 -cu im +_+ N v)-0 Q• X V 4 v) Vs s 4- 4- a) > O Q a) ca a) ca 0 4- ca O avi s cn < 0) o 2 s 4- cn a) -o > a) s +-, cm s +-,a) +, ca O - s .2 •— Q-0-Ci N o o 0) -0 a) > 0.)co L Vs Q c O O Q x cu a) ) Q C a) >N Q Es CU O � m C ca -0 co > D W tea) 0 0 i.L 0 > L L O o O c >, c6 4 c6 E a) a D E -0 O a) < .C s 4- Q (73 a) c6 4- s Q) _ -o L '7 a) 4- 4- cu L ca -a O D (13 lzu°C a • 0 L C CU Cll -0 o VS - 4- -o V C O a) '0 -a Q }, L a) a) 0-0 V O - O _ Q +-+ each scenario is in line with the water demand L VS C ro u o_ a) O Q E C a) L O a) u ca L > a) CU u Q O vs a_ ca a) a) s a) a) v Q Cl CX3 (13 as ) s a) C CD C ca o O Q Q >, 0 Qa) *O Q > CU Q v) -0 -o C o_ C ca 4- a) VS a 0 4- a L E s 4- 4- 0 O CU C s 4- a) 4- F 4- O 4- a) a) O 4- VS OS OS VS 0 a) vi 0 0 a- ca a) ca 0 (13 4- L 0 z 0 s 4- ca -o 0 co can 4- OS 0 0 a) -o C 03 4- (73 vs 0 (13 a ca 4- (13 ca 0 4- a) 4- a •o L Q CC G3 4- vs 4- a a) ca 0 CU co csII a) o.� L a) 4- s z c6 s Na Q Q c+� c6 -0 al F c6 C it) s a, ro s 2 O a, D 0)L }, s 0Ce ca ca CU > C CU N C o 2 -0 a) s= Q a).0 F q- Q V > Q D O ca v) NO = O- L 0 .v FL a) a) L -o N N vs � O a) 4 � vs C U >,n 054- ._ U' CC . a3(f) 8 .C 0.)_ cCU _ C_ `'D•L a,0 a) C •0 Q O I V)> }' +- -I-, L •, -I-, - Q L s a) Q L +� a) +4-,-o O O L 5 ca -0 a) U < Q > > O U a) vi ca 0 0 4- N +.6 Q s N L 0 4- Groundwater VS C Mark Noble City of Shakopee H 0 0cu - Comment V 0 H O ca cc) i - N _O aa)� co 0 > O N -o •- - 2 a) ocu 3 = > a C : _c v) O •- cu c 1 r6 O a) Q C C -. v5 m -oN C +:,"N •u -c ru E cu N O-) Q Q vi v) DO .- O ( a) N � cn .-, +, r6 0 Q Q O o_ c a> E V ) o v °' r6 `6 o 0 DC Q a,�, Q a) :0E( s O - -o C a) }' a) s N . a- O Q s vi Nate-+ O }' S- -I-, V) C ≥ vn a) •CL� a) a) O C O E O O C u O cu a3 Eu a) N u +�cm -+ (6 C O .� r N N ca _ V)n) 0 N fC C V) +7, = a) cu O O C c6 a) u a) C O o _ :v)>: a, Q v `n N s <uO °_ °) a) a) ( O) - te C a) 4-, a) ca O _c a) ca L u = 73c6 ~ cm c6 N O •c x 0 cu C O D O a) ° O O E C - c •— � a V) a) L .� •L_ O L C O a) O O O a) N +_+ Vra a) a) cu ra N 4-,c v) ate--+ O a� 5 D a) _c v E +a C Cu C ~ ca a) `r' — , a) O O •o .p a) °n . E2 cu •, cu a) E u CU r6 • O c6 O V) a a) a) L_ ru L_ O a) .— • a) a) i Q a✓ O O .V) .E O vi - Q.) E a) -o a) -o O CU F- fa) O -o a) CU CU c O CU N O �' 4-, v) L 0 a) ru C r6 v) _E -0 N a-, Q ca a-, c6 E c6 E .- O •C O O V) c (1) 73 O C O O N CU v) c +J O r6 OC a) c a) C O D a� D c '� -O� '>cu , a3 a) cu sp L N C Q.) O ca O 0 CO >, O u > O a 0:3` a) a) w ca Q O c c a) cu .— c E O Q-' E cu a) La 0 co - p Cu O '> Q E > L) ru V C C _C : a) X > Q a) ca a✓ u 73 a) a) We believe that the inaccuracies and inconsistencies in ca >, O V) Cu O .§ O : E m O • C n O N >' a) O a� aI ' � +-, cn CO vi >, u V Q 0 D c6 •( s -I-,Oa >, >s Lr a; > . c ai I. Q +� +� c6 O ) ru � (13 4- • L v) N -I-, 1 v •E O v vI O +� +-+ N M N a) }, 5 CU a) a) tirn E C O CD- c�a �, a /Qa r' L_ _ a) O � 92 CY) ai u C V) LO i C ca ,__ O) a, D C _ O vi s >, O CU a>-. L- -O cn E c6 c6 c6 • N C - a) a) O : u '� s a) v, O ra _E O- CT cn '> E cu > 2 • V N Q L 0) a) Q e� 0 Q N V v) a 0) Q O Z o -a Olacs i o Z Q Z O 13 � •C v v, a �� s -t3 o CLL aO 'Q V>, t O Q V • C ( C - N E a) 0 ri o O ar L. V) N o1,1 • z o13 o a Q v a s a s attachment to their 2025 letter. a) L.rj c O al a) a a) -O .C N ca O) a) O •E a-, N D •- > O N }' U -I-,U V' a) a) fu CU a✓ O C a3 N _ L_ a) c N O 0 U CU C 0) c6 CU O r6 0- N V) O Q 2 CU Cu O u Cu C a51 U a� S- 0 V) 1 a -a V) O a� •v 0- v S - a) C L_ a✓ c C O a) '+7, E O a) U �C Wastewater C Cu a� O Q O a-, N O 2 U Mark Noble City of Shakopee vt 0 vt CC Comment V .- 0- 0 H statement that has been added to Item/Section 14 (Water Resources) was =v CD 0 o V o L._ +� 0 N a) -C C V +' 4--' c6 C C O 0 -O = Q) v C C ` Q) E O � V co E cu O cu O c) 'v 73 Q CU O v) 4-1 � O c O cu 73 t -c statem a) C C +' c6 v) CL N a) cD cp C CU N N _C O U N Q Q N N 0 5 E V C O O in = N ra O V CU a) -c 0 N O O L- CU V) C O V o a Q -o a) Q s�g0 cu c6 O C .c) • _ no v Q CU a v _C Q C v O 0 ra C C }, O O V x .O = a) Q, ca n C4-1 `~ C O oc < CZ V L> O D O cu Q a) ti < 73 in C C Lf) -O '- +� ) C O v c a) �j .v c E — 0 o c 'O Q a) a •) ' a) a) ai V C ',_ V CD " 0 N +J — N > N V . - v) ca -o O a) r. CU C 0 a) ce cu Q ca N cu p D D >, C O a) 0 c13 -O = 0 Q D L_ ca v) c a) =- _, DCcu >, co m CD C Q7is , 2 O D cu CD 0-r(3 CD Q) CC • - O Q DC -g CD vC CD • 7) Q) < V N (13C)ate-+ O 0 D_ L Q) = Q O 0 N i- r6 •≥ •V _ m Q V L_ v) c C L_ D C V vi vi C D N a) a) CD .4-, -' O N C a) O O D N N N Q Ln i N N U E 4-1 > a) a) ca >, O - 0 Qate--+ C .O N U OC O QO N ro O N N •X N O O 0 Tu v) cu Q •> o > > F- 0 D_ Qc) CD V 0_ V O O 0 V 0 73 • CU V 0 CD v) .0 C V Comprehensive Plans. Since the No Build scenario must reflect the (13 0 CU 4- a) .C a V CD CU N a O_ E O Ln O N cu O 0 0 L) Q) 0 (13 -o cu O ca .L O V V) V) 0 -C 0 U CD N C O) 0 0 • .+7,- � V a) — cu Q) N C •� C a) • O Q O I C }' C U CU .V O E E C O O_ O- O 0 0 +3 > > C Q) Cl.) CU CD -O -O D a) • - v) >, C C 0 C : V C N 0 v) CD V 'gin C O •c C co c CD -o 0 0 C O }' V1 ' s N D D r V -O a) O) CD a) O CD CU C >, CU CU 0- Q O) Q v; Q) ate) N E a cu O L a� C cu a) 0 V ca (13 0) O) CD 0 0 CD cu -o V cu aa) a) cu a� a E ate) v) a-) C a) E O O O .L7 TD > a) a, 0 cn C 0 V a) a) E Q v Ln a) O O CD CD Mark Noble City of Shakopee ...0 H 0 0- cu Comment V_ 0- 0 a --- L_ (13 L/) rB a--, c a) E E O V vi a) 4-,-0 i N -a D O Q V D — < • +-+ a) V - CU +-, I— O 4- N C O Iv) fp a) -o O C 0:5 C VD co Q .-E C O 4- O +, +- }, C V C D CU O O N co � ca a) >> o -o O C N V) C O a) CL O1 U a < C L_ D v) O Q 0 V > a) cp a) -O co a� rp N O O ra - v = 4- CU CU C '- V C a� —O ra O 0 C -o V Q r6 ra C O N .O i Q O 4- ra E O C. Q O 0 —o r0 cm a--+ N E CU — 4- a) v) a) Q 0 4— vI .C 0 V a) 0 Ln O O M 0 0 v) 0 (13 U LA 4_, a) E O a) a) -o 4a) _, cm o) a) i U C 0 V N Q C C6 ate--+ a- V CU a-, a) 72 .> 0 Q C co vI C 0 .+, N .O L_ Q C (13 0 O1 CD C 0 CD +a N a) Q O 4- C s_ Q O a) C N 4 = O L 'v -o v) E N a) -o a) a) -o o -' O ro Q73 a) D > L. < 22 D < ra 7 a) v) V) +—, a) c Ea" i Q E O O v) E 2 O O ._ V CD O_ a) .� a) a) L Q E o cp ra CU C v O N a 2025 AUAR -o ra O C U V) .D ca rD 2 co O .C C U () .O C CU V) ro CU It is now clear to Council staff that the number of O L O = C O ra C a) v) C D i a--, U U -o LA V) C 0- a) a) coo v a) 4— -o O > C % r6 +� $3 L_ CD Q v,L OCT CU Cl.) L7 0 C (13 }, +, a) •- D >> (LA 0 O - V C 'E a) a) C E C O -' Q a) a O v) 4— r( > }' N 4- : 'a E •_ 0_ vI O ca C C }, O 0 a) c > V 4- 4--- a) a) CD O -O ra v) Q E as CU .� C L_ Q F o AUAR Process (Shawn James, 651-602-1233) vI -O LE -O N O -O -O C �> 4— ( O V v) L a) L_ Q O - N Q C O � .,7 -O ra rD C C ,,, ra v%, I = -O v, v N C C C ra C : ro 0- V Q > V .v) CD -I-, a) a) C 0 : -O Cl v) N E C co O — ID V -o v, '5,:?_ O O ra v) E a) C .+7,_c a) vi r6 a_ a) .� N a) Q E o cp v) > o co v) 4- V a) 4- (13 a) L_ v) O C 0 4- Q CU ra (13 vI 0 v) > 0 C CU a--, > N 0 4- a) C ra CU CU C D v) a--, L C understanding that it will be developed under the City's AUAR Process C .O aD-+ L_ V . c6 O O j5 o V ( O 4:7 C V Ln _C ......,. 2 V 2 Mark Noble City of Shakopee w vt o o_cu Comment V_ 0- 0 — w al a O C C o •c +-+ 3 V O v) C co O N }' Q cu Q DCU v) C CD O > 4 4 _C V }' _C O a) .� C a) a) L Q E O V O Ln O NJ a) 4- O C 0 cD E Q a) ca Q 0_ O Vi S - X - CD -O = +-, , C > N Ln O ate--+ ca _C> a) --+ .� •- ate) -o N C , o c2 E 0 - 0 0- 0_= N CU C O O CU a) a) C 4- > -0 - , CD C v C C CU C V) a) �a `a E o — q- a) o Q Q •� a) •. 0 D V) I. ca N C a) O a) a) v)V .0 v) -0 -0 D _ V +-,,� C 0 C co o O V a) c o_ ci a) E o a) D a) -I-,v S- 0 •- C Q D > Q Q ._ D .-, Todd Graham, 651-602-1322 The AUAR describes three scenarios: a 2040 O •E O c6 ' E C ca a) c v v -0 c/) •D a) X 0- 2 o D c a °e C Q O a) Q •c v C V) C cu a) N -0 O Li) C c6 D - +-, 0_ CC a; > Q D c .v.) < CU CU Ln q5, N N Q ai a3 E -0O C -c V Ca E - al Q (13 O 4- 0- 0 0 O N. Li C .VI 0 00 Ol N V) a) C . C .CD V) .C co 'V a) F F O L_ a) 0 O 4 - CU CO Cr C 0 F m a) CD 0 .co 0 L.r) m -o c6 v Q s_ 0 0 v O S- 0 V) v a) 0 O 0 L) 0 C a� a) 2 a) a) a) V) a� a) ai ai F- a) va +-+ CU O C 0 CD 0 CD N Q CD a) L_ Q a) 0 > ru .C 0 a� a) 2 N 4- ca a-, C a) E 0 > a) 73 CD a N a) i- 4-; v a) 0 O Ln NJ co N Q 73 c6 a) co L- 0 0 L) O 03 a) 0 N Q a) the citywide forecast. Specifically: 0 v) •- N 0 — CD N CD ti m m 0 O Q 0 C ' O = 73 f v) rn ca a) N � V -0 V a) V = V) u 0 L - -0 D OC O o L a co 0 2 2 a) < ° CD a) v) a C a) 0 a) a) C pC _c N = a Q N •c a D ryl00 D c l— o -Co O 00 O O N a) N Q .C No N D Q O O < •� Ln C 0 E N a3 N V D O 0)v, 0 r6 0)_C N C N a) •C O v)O : O O • _C CD 4- v, _C a--, tn cD V a) 0 C CD a--+ O +a : a) 2 V L_ CU CU CU C 0 +, V a) > ro O" LI1 C N a-, O i CU N O N M N N Mark Noble O N O M Q) DI 03 d City of Shakopee aw H C CP- CC Should future water demand in the project area surpass current water supply capacity, the City will work with the DNR to obtain necessary appropriation permit(s) when they wish to drill a new well. The City will purchase additional capacity in the interceptor, after flows within the interceptor, at Townline Avenue, reach 3 cubic feet per second peak flow, or 571,000 gallons per day (gpd) averaged. The Metropolitan Council's concerns will receive further consideration during C E 0 V • The 2025 AUAR Update scenario discusses 3,551 jobs and more commercial, industrial, and office floor space than has previously been discussed. The AUAR Update focuses 98.5% of the nonresidential development in subareas A and B (TAZ 2177) and subarea D (TAZ 2116). Met Council's allocation assigns employment growth of 1,691 jobs in affected TAZs from 2022 to 2050. The floorspace analysis in the AUAR Update implies substantially more employment and households by an order of magnitude. Met Council staff advise a discussion of TAZ allocations of growth to align expectations during the City's preparation of a 2050 Plan Update. Lilia Franklin, 651-602-1179 Should future water demand in the project area surpass current water supply capacity, the City should work with the DNR to obtain necessary appropriation permit(s) when they wish to drill a new well. Roger Janzig, rogerjanzig@metc.state.mn.us The Updated AUAR includes the 2040 Comp Plan Scenario, Max Build Scenario, and 2025 AUAR Update Scenario. The City must purchase additional capacity in the interceptor, after flows within the interceptor, at Townline Avenue, reach 3 cubic feet per second peak flow, or 571,000 gallons per day (gpd) averaged. Based on the submitted revisions and the City's assurance that the Council's concerns will receive further v 0 Water Appropriation L_ a) r'3 ra Objection Withdrawal u _ an an Metropolitan Council (December 2025 Objection Withdrawal Letter) C o }, s_ v ro p 7v E O C U Ln C N t a) o }, a a' o 0 Metropolitan Council Ln o N N o (NI o m "71 - NJ Mark Noble City of Shakopee Comment V_ 0- H 0 C 0 .� -0 M 0) C >, C cu TM a--+ c c v 0 Q O E CO vn C O v) v v La,' vi 0 v O `n +' a) cu r y a) a) a 0 -I-, -C a) O .+7,.+7,C O aJ cu o -I-,C � v, f3 • C _0 E .>CL) c C -0 LA E O N 2C3I a3 Q '� C CIC2 C a) v� c a) N .O *f cE3 0 ro N D m c6 O D c c� +E � L cia o '� - 0 O)a, 0 Q: oC D ii- O �._ru C O_ N 0_ E V O O 0 0 V 4-1 0 4-1 0 - 0 VI VI 0 CU CLI ai -o DC a a E 0 > 0 Q LE 0 0 v 0 }' _Q C C c6 ru n a) a cU c 2 2 N c L }' 'C C -, C V NO L N 0) = -' a 0 L +� c CO ca a3 N — N - — 0 v) . _ ca c 113 a.) OW 2a3 170 Ea) mai> .(,)(7 'erv)— ruw •_63 7:32 03 C I cn Q 0 p }' C.- Q(0 O M E CU O m •� o CZ o v O j �' +� C O— CU C > .— >N C13 CU - a3._� a) Q c O a) 0_O < D c 0_ > CU CU CU ._ v, •� -o oO a) •C - +-r Q _c ora O= a `n a) a a) O CU I p a LE N D +�-, O m ca • - C �,73LE m >0 Q- O >•o a, ° L_ . >, O +� C ra vii = i.i a= p Q cn 2 a v Section 14 states there has been C O a) J O c p a) 2 E C Q (6 a) a) 0 I N O N M N N Mark Noble O N O t n Q) DI 03 d City of Shakopee Response This information has been added to the Water Appropriation Section. Additional information has been added regarding risks to public supply wells. In response to this comment, the City of Shakopee reached out to Shakopee Public Utilities to obtain up to date information on water supply. The groundwater section was updated to reflect the latest information. The City's Comprehensive Water System Plan Update indicates 19 total municipal wells. Information was added regarding the City's Spill Response Plan under Item/Section 14 under Water Supply and Water Quality. Information was added regarding coordination for stormwater management planning (e.g., with the Watershed District). Comment The tabulation of wells is incomplete. There are other public water supply wells within the project area. Exact locations of public supply wells are non-public, but consider reaching out to MDH to mitigate risk to public supply wells. Additionally, there are likely domestic wells not in the County Well Index. Any homes not connected to a public water supply can be assumed to have a well. This should be noted in the plan. Shakopee now has 16 primary water supply wells, not the eight as specified in the plan. The wells mostly use water from the Jordan Sandstone aquifer, not the Prairie du Chien — Jordan aquifer. Consider working with Shakopee Public Utilities to ensure the most up to date information on water supply is included in the AUAR. Stormwater management and spill response should consider the nearby public water supply wells and domestic supply wells. Public water supply wells are within the site. Spill response plans should include notification of nearby well owners, both public and private. Because part of the site is in a high vulnerability DWSMA, there are limits on where infiltration can take place. There is no discussion of where the ponds or infiltration areas may be located to limit potential impacts to drinking water supplies. V '0- 0 H cu a3 I cu ' : E o a) a) }' ,C a) ft5 I cu ,— D E o a.)a) }' ,C a) a3 I cu � D E o a, a, }' ,C u = w I 0 I 0 I 0 Ln O N N O \ O M o NJ N O1 ca d Mark Noble City of Shakopee w H 0 0 - LA W W Understood. Text has been added to Item/Section 22 of the document (Transportation) and the Transportation Memo (Appendix H) to clarify what the mitigation measures are based on and provide additional factors that may also necessitate future improvements. Text has been added to Item/Section 22 of the document (Transportation) and the Transportation Memo (Appendix H) to clarify county spacing requirements with future classification changes. Text has been added to Item/Section 22 of the document (Transportation) and the Transportation Memo (Appendix H) to discuss warrants. Acknowledged and understood — the City of Shakopee will coordinate with MnDOT as specific projects move forward. 4a C cu E E O V The County appreciates the City's efforts in continuing to understand the needs of future County Road improvements in the annexation area. While some previous mitigation options now say "mitigation may no longer be needed," it should be clear in the document text that these mitigation recommendations are only based on volume assumptions. Other factors like safety or policy may require or necessitate future improvements. The CH 78 and Zumbro Avenue intersection will be monitored, and mitigation will be implemented in the future if necessary. However, a signal or roundabout would not meet our spacing requirements for the planned Future Principal Arterial. Any signalization will need to meet signal warrants. It is assumed that a future signal will be constructed at Vierling and CH 69 when warrants are met. Thank you for the opportunity to review the Jackson Township Development Area AUAR. Please note that MnDOT's review of this AUAR does not constitute approval of a regional traffic analysis and is not a specific approval for access or new roadway improvements. As plans are refined, we would like the opportunity to coordinate with our partners and to review the updated information. MnDOT's staff has reviewed the document and has the following comments: .V O I— C O +_, ca O Q VI cz IL Transportation Transportation `- O VI N .� E > O O u _ c Oo oO 4- ci .� .° Scott County Transportation Services Division Scott County Transportation Services Division t- 0 C(1:5 o Ln O N N O ' CN O m r• -- NJ Q) O1 ca O_ Mark Noble City of Shakopee w vt 0- vt Comment u w al a 4 - Li co Q E 0 I 0 N C N 0) C CO 0) a) 22 4- N I - Assessment 0 L_ Co u v) C 0 .- v) v) .E w O I. N CO C a) a) in Co V) C N L.9cu _ N o o- O N cV c O U Li) E cu C Co O_ C 0 Co cm 2 m X C a) Q Q CoC C Q 0 0 of o) Co V a) co E > co a)Co F (13 C .C 2 cr O cV a) C (7) v) 0 E N C v3 ._ co DI w a) 0) V3 C 3 co O - L.) N cu L_ D N N c o_ Co v 5 - N O ca r v N -C _ 0) Co L n -0 Co 0 a) C U N L 0 a) Co V) a) S- 0 Co CoO 0) C () • a) o) .C Co v) Co N E -C I - 05 O S - (t) a) a) v) 0 .� .E a) C Co I 0 F Co -C a) vI N N vI 0 .� .F a) 0 C 0 F Co be removed from the air. 0 O Co I Q Co O C 0 .� vI .E E 0 a) o) •.� N cc • s_ v) s_ V F 0 Li - v) 0 .- v) vI .E N o) .D a) L_ 0 v) o) L_ cz ate-+ co L_ L) vi v L_ 0 vI 0 L_ Q v) L_ a) 0 Co -o •v Q V a) LE > v) N L C vI N O Q co 0 Co 2 .> Co N vI 0 .� vI .F N 0 0 in N vi a) ro -,--, Co Co F N O s_ 0_ a) 0 (13 0 v) C .C 2 0 0 .� Co Q vI CU 0 Q cc Q D Q vI ra Li a) m a) 0 0 Q C co C 0 Co F V) O S - CU 0- V) Co Co I Co Q F 0 I 0 Co a) o) cm _-0 0 C 0 .cn C a) Co o) LE N 0 F O +?; Co Co N Co vI -o ro -o (13 N O Q Q a) F N a) a) o) C cu I .C C ro vi a) L L 0 O L.n N .F ro Li - Co a) Co a) V) V) vI Co 0 CD C Ez a) V) V) Co 0) LE CU C 0 • F 2 > Co N .E a) > -o (13 v) 0 .� .E N Q Coa-+ a) vI (13 C vI vI vI Co Ez vI N • O L_ Q C 0 .LA Co Q Co Co V L 0 C Co a) Co -o a) - 2 > a) vI N L_ C F 0 Li - v) 0 .� .F a) N F 0 a) ol .� D vi N O L > 0 a) a) a) o) CoEz a) U ate-+ C . a) N CoC Co -C Vis S- 0 VI C 0 0- E a) co LE Cll - C E vI a) co a) O -o •c N N 73 Q 73 N ca F a) 0 a) Ti LE a) under the build scenario. 0 .E N a) ate-+ Co 0 Projects can offset GHG/VMT using any of the following Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions i- 0 0 C 2 Ln O N N O (NI O M CO N N ca d Mark Noble City of Shakopee w vt O- vt Comment V .- 0- o I- V w al a 0 a) -o -o ra .E a) a) I. Li — _a) cc, I. ca O- O II nine offset categories identified by the legislature: • Transit expansion CD 0) C 4) Lr) }, L C V) Cl.) CU E`— Cl.) . C O C L O Q }, ate-, • L CD 0 U Q • L Ln ra in ,_ C ; C a-+ S— V —' Q CZ • • • Micromobility lity • Transportation demand management a) E o) ra CD E ai C CD L a--, CIS - V) CU X .E CZ C a) a) cD V cu• c- 4— CU I. 0 CU Oa CU V) C CD E cu Q .E 4) ate-, V V) N E C �.4=1 C L 2 a) c a) .E — Q O • 0 Natural systems I. C o 4LALA 0 E 7 a) c6 I L) Q E ro N O .O }, L cu QV N D CD 0 N D CU 1 U O iii Q _C N V N a3 U- O 0_ C (13 (1) C L v) 0 }, a) � V = a) Q L Q �5 ca 0 -,, a) E v.) I Q cu Q ~ v) a) L- o) V c 0 -o cu O E Q �O Tu 2 > < 73 i- 0 0 G cn C ate-, C CU 0 C ate-+ i ) 0 +-+ co +-+ te a-+ CD 0 E cu 73 not increase. CD 0 0) L 0 C V) F ate-+ cu vi 73 a--+ V .C C 0 CD V Q CD +-, F Q cn C I- 0 C C 0 -o a) a--+ E -o 0 v) 0 a) 0 a-+ c6 E 0 ._ c i a) V L 0 / (f) 1 N' Ii I- 0 O C Ca C Cl,. v, n v, www.dot.state.mn.us +,I co a) ra co > -o ra Ln cts O N i v o L.., O O M v 0 0 a) v L.) Q Q; U 0 LD Qo i U O v E v, v v, Q U E v, C O •'VA v I •Cy^V_ V U C O C Q W • V • c5 E y V +; c a) O E D N c 2 a, Cl,— Ln o N N O CN O Cr) al NJ a) O1 ca Mark Noble City of Shakopee w vt 0 o_ 11 W Comment u 0- o H u w al a DC Q D O < +, a) 73 a) 73 ca a) vJ _O (C3 ro O > C ca O O E Q u 0 Q a) E +' C N E coN }' a) QE +-1 V) " -0 LE c Q F : 3 VI LE 4-1 0 0- D a) O 0 J 0 a.dot.state.mn.us letter with the drainage permit application. 0 + ca v Q 03 cu o CU O ca a) — v ca 73 73 C ca vi (a Q o) C vi (a Q cm f3 0 .- 0 0 0 0 Q a--+ O) C a-, V) C 0 F 73 vI C 0 v cm I. v) 'a) ca a) F ru vi a) I. C .� F a) ca O O) l- 0 0 C 7i CD N N ca 0 C 0 0 L...) 0 ate--+ V) ca a) L ca a) o) C 73 a) Q 0 Q 73 C ca C T< N a) a--� 4- vI 73 C a) L_ 0 L) a-, a) a) ra 73 C 0 L_ (13 vi 0 + ca v CO E O v) O N a) a-, L_ O a-, o_ a-, 0 O LL 0 O_ 73 C (13 a) 0 F 0 Q V 0 m vi 4- a) a) E 0 v) Q L_ a) 0 73 ca C C ( ca - O I (a --+ C ( 'a§ O +-' v a1 E I -I-,m ( 0 ca I. L) v) C M N N. - ca v)• � N 0 a) �n ai Q)C 73 • - �� L Li Q CD WC 0 = Q O a3 D v C a) Cr '- F E L_ O ai a) a� Q § _ DC a) ra a) c�•� a--' C > L C L 0 vi O) cz( D c 0 N 0 . a) 0 C C n 5 D O+—,.— Li) . 0— a) .n a) L ca O o) l- 0 0 C v) 4- L.) ca ca 0 C Q 73 C ca a) O ra .> ca a) ca vI 4- E a) Q Q F Q .a) 0 s_ Q C (13 ai 0 v) C F 4- 4- v) a-+ 0 73 ca _Q O vi co a) Q ( 0 a--+ v) E vi a-, F a) L_ 0 o) .0 (13 a L_ 4- a� a) 4- 0 O_ D vis a) E a) .—D CT E O .4— E o_ cm fu 0 .4- a) CT O a--+ v) 0 O a--� a) 2 i- 0 0 2 O V L.) D 4- 4 - O a) v) a) O_ state.mn.us or 651-775- ca 0 + L.) v) E Lri O .a— F L_ a) O i- 0 0 C 2 Ln O N N O ' (NI O M O NJ N N O1 ca d Mark Noble City of Shakopee w H 0 o_ H cu W Comment V. 0 I- u w al a Acknowledged and understood. (13 - 7 75 D .� U 4) 73 U c (0 N O U c M >, • >6 U a) • TC Li— a--' Z 4) 0 +a L _ o a) : L .5 N v, N N > O 0 N >C a •u Q Q N O U c6 +-, •• a) c( '0 • `n ca " a) a) L o0 E C v V) 5 o L 0 O - Ct V) a) 0 vi U U . • c• o O N materials may be submitted as: 0 V▪ I (0 Q 1. Email documents and VI • 4_, L', (0 C E a) v, E a, +a L) CU U C E 0 a) _c L U = c6 + moo (0 V1 E N D (0 -0 E v) metrodevreviews.dot cu ca > ca 2 c6 a) c) a)Nj mu 0_0) 0) ' N L U 0) Q) CU a O co : C U C v) i- 0 0 2 O N 0 Q CD 0 cn 713 U m 2 O L > 0 cn a) u_ cV vi C F I. I. vn a-+ O 73 E Web Transfer Client site: htt 4- CZ -I-, VI C CZ VT D C F ai vi 0 vi N .a) L N 73 0 L I. a, F 4— ro 0 V will create a shared folder in which files can be ra a--+ .( E a) .C o_ E 0 cz ra CO CD 0 6 a) co 0 Q N F 0 N N 73 S▪ .- 0 > a L C i- 0 0 C 2 From: Dingle, Sandi <sandi.dingle@metc.state.mn.us> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:38 AM To: Mark Noble <MNoble@ShakopeeMN.gov> Cc: Env.Review@state.mn.us; Tod Sherman <tod.sherman@dot.state.mn.us>; Barajas, Lisa <Lisa.Barajas@metc.state.mn.us>; Young -Walters, MacKenzie <Mackenzie.Young- `alters@metc.state.mn.us>; James, Shawn <Shawn.James@metc.state.mn.us>; ReviewsCoordinator <ReviewsCoordinator@metc.state.mn.us> Subject: Shakopee 2025 Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update Objection 22373-3 The attached letters are being sent to you electronically on 10/14/2025. METR0POUTA hf Sandi Dingle Program Technical Specialist I Regional Planning sandi.dingle@metc.state.mn.us P. 651.602.1312 I C. 651.329.0373 390 North Robert Street I St. Paul, MN I 55101 I metrocouncil.org CONNECT WITH US 400 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL October 14, 2025 Mark Noble, Senior Planner, Planning and Development City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: City of Shakopee - Jackson Township Development Area - Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Update Metropolitan Council Review File No. 22373-3 Metropolitan Council District No. 4 Dear Mark Noble: Metropolitan Council staff received the Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update (AUAR Update) on September 30, 2025. The AUAR Update represents the 5 -year update required under environmental rules, encompassing a study area of approximately 2,889 acres located west and south of City of Shakopee limits, and analyzes the potential for development of up to 2,918 residential units; 3,108,550 square feet of office; 1,939,408 square feet of manufacturing; 1,939,408 square feet of warehouse; 399,679 square feet of neighborhood retail; and 2,527,265 square feet of highway retail. Metropolitan Council staff reviewed the Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update to determine its adequacy and accuracy in addressing regional concerns. Pursuant to Minn. Rules 4410.3610, subp 5D, we have objections with the AUAR Update. Upon receiving the AUAR Update on September 30, 2025, Met Council staff discovered that the City prematurely adopted the original AUAR on March 17, 2020. The Revised AUAR (original AUAR) was noticed in the Environmental Quality Board's (EQB) Monitor on March 9, 2020, and the 10 -day response period (not including weekends or holidays) ended on March 23, 2020. In accordance with Minn. Rule 4410.3610 subp. 5 (E), the earliest the City could have adopted the AUAR was March 30, 2020, which is 15 days after the City's distribution of the AUAR. Therefore, the City erroneously adopted the original AUAR before the 10 -day review period was complete. The premature adoption of the original AUAR in 2020 resulted in a lack of City response to the Met Council's comments, dated March 23, 2020 (attached), which indicated that the AUAR was incomplete and did not adhere to Minn. Rules 4410.3610, subp. 3 as it did not include at least one scenario consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. In both the original AUAR and the AUAR Update, there are two development scenarios. The No Build scenario is based on the Shakopee 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the Scott County 2030 Comprehensive Plan - which is in conflict with Minn. Rule 4410.3610, subp. 3 and therefore invalid. There is no change to this scenario from the original AUAR to this AUAR Update. The Build Scenario presented in the AUAR is based on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and the project magnitude numbers have been adjusted in the AUAR Update to account for more intense residential development than previously planned. It is clear from the information and correspondence contained in the submittal that the AUAR Update and Mitigation Plan do not assess the impacts of an adequate number of development scenarios, and the Metropolitan Council (Regional Office & Environmental Services) 390 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101-1805 P 651.602.1000 I F 651.602.1550 I TTY 651.291.0904 metrocouncil.org An Equal Opportunity Employer 401 AUAR Update does not comply with the AUAR review process outlined in Minnesota Rules. The No Build scenario must reflect the comprehensive plan that is currently in effect, not a previous version of the City's plan. The City of Shakopee's 2040 Comprehensive Plan was authorized by the Metropolitan Council on October 23, 2019, and adopted by the City on November 19, 2019. Therefore, the 2030 Plan is no longer in effect and cannot be referenced as such. Similarly, Scott County's 2030 Plan is no longer in effect and cannot be referenced. According to Minn. Rules 4410.3610, subp. 3, an AUAR must specify more than one scenario of anticipated development, one of which needs to be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan. Since the No Build scenario is invalid as described, the AUAR Update continues to be incomplete because it only presents one development scenario based on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. According to the AUAR guidance on the EQB's website, "Whenever a certain impact may or may not occur, depending on the exact design of future developments, the AUAR should cover the possible impacts through a "worst case scenario" analysis or else prevent the impacts through the provisions of the mitigation plan. Failure to cover possible impacts by one of these means risks the invalidation of the environmental review exemption for specific development projects."The project magnitude data based on the 2040 Plan does not assess the maximum impact of potential development based on the planned land uses. For instance, Subarea E projects 123 residential units, but the 2040 Plan's Land Use guiding requires a minimum of 156 units and allows a maximum of 394 residential units and the maximum allowable density. The projected magnitude in this Subarea E as well as other Subareas A through G are well below the maximum number of units allowed under the 2040 Plan's Land Use. The original AUAR underestimated the projected magnitudes for all the subareas to such a degree that development proposals which came after the AUAR was adopted were well above what was studied in the AUAR while still within the maximum allowed by land use. To adequately assess the potential for environmental impacts, the AUAR Update must include a scenario that represents the maximum development expected or allowed. The AUAR is only a valid form of environmental review for projects that are within the geographic boundaries and consistent with the projections of the development scenarios in the AUAR. The EQB's guidance on page 38 states, "In defining development scenarios, the RGU should keep in mind the fundamental principle that if actual development — in total or in any subarea — is proposed to exceed the maximum development studied, the AUAR loses its validity as a substitute for an EA W and EIS...", which is consistent with Minn. Rule 4410.3610 subp. 2(A). The AUAR Update revealed that development was built or approved in Subarea C that exceeded the projected magnitude or development studied in the AUAR. The revised project magnitude numbers in the AUAR Update should have been studied before this development was built or approved. Also, the scenarios and projected magnitudes in the traffic study differ from those described in the project description. The traffic study includes a 2040 Comp Plan Scenario and a Max Build Scenario, but the project description includes a 2030 Comp Plan Scenario and a 2040 Comp Plan Scenario. It appears that the Max Build Scenario in the traffic study is consistent with the 2040 Comp Plan Scenario in the project description. However, as mentioned above, the Max Build Scenario is not consistent with the maximum development expected or allowed under the land use of the 2040 Comp Plan. The scenarios provided in the studies need to be consistent with the AUAR scenarios. Inconsistencies across the Final AUAR, the City -adopted AUAR, the AUAR Update project description, and the AUAR Update traffic scenario prevent Metropolitan Council staff from determining the correct development scenarios. The original AUAR adopted by the City on March 17, 2020, provides different project magnitude numbers than the Final AUAR that was distributed by the City in the EQB Monitor dated March 9, 2020. The distributed original AUAR projected 1,753 residential units in the Build Scenario, whereas the City -adopted original AUAR projected 1,613 residential units in the Build Scenario. Page - 2 I October 14, 2025 I METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 402 AUARs are meant to be an alternate form of environmental review to facilitate development and must provide the foundational assurance that environmental impacts to regional systems are unlikely or mitigated as part of development proposals. This provides a shared understanding by which development proposals and future comprehensive plan amendments can be reviewed. As referenced from EQB guidelines above, "if actual development — in total or in any subarea — is proposed to exceed the maximum development studied, the AUAR loses its validity as a substitute for an EAW and EIS."The Metropolitan Council is unable to assess potential impacts to regional system and policy plans due to inadequacies in the AUAR Update process and insufficient information provided in the AUAR Update itself. To give the Council and the City of Shakopee an opportunity to further explore and rectify the matters expressed above, the Council is filing an official objection to the AUAR pursuant to Minn. Rules 4410.3610, subp. 5.D based on the following and as outlined in this letter: • The AUAR Update and Mitigation Plan do not assess the impacts of an adequate number of development scenarios and include out-of-date information and inconsistent data for review. • The project magnitude data based on the 2040 Plan does not assess the maximum impact of potential development based on the planned land uses. The AUAR Update must include a scenario that represents the maximum development expected or allowed by the City's current comprehensive plan. • Inconsistencies across the original AUAR, the City -adopted Final AUAR, the AUAR Update project description, and the AUAR Update traffic scenario prevent a clear determination of the correct development scenarios under review. • Documentation provided is not sufficient to assess any subsequent potential comprehensive plan amendments or to implement development plans. The Council's responsibility is to fully assess impacts on the regional system and policy plans as well as carefully consider impacts on the environment as a result of growth and development within the region. To do this, the Council needs to fully understand the scale and scope of potential development within the study area. This issue may be resolved by correcting the scenarios analysis as described to meet direction outlined in the Minnesota Rules referenced throughout this letter. Groundwater Analysis (Lila Franklin, 651-602-1179) The projected number of residential units nearly doubled in the AUAR Update. In the AUAR Update, please provide updated water demand information for the outlined scenarios and ensure that the demand for each scenario is in line with the water demand projections described in Shakopee's current local water supply plan. Since Shakopee's local water supply plan is developed by the Shakopee PUC, we recommend working with them directly to ensure that any planned development will not be limited by the need for additional water appropriations. We also suggest working with Shakopee PUC and the DNR for any additional water appropriations that are needed to serve additional residents in the AUAR project area. Consider noting in the "Groundwater" or "Water Appropriations" subsection of the AUAR Update that parts of the AUAR study area fall within a high vulnerability drinking water supply management area (DWSMA). The exact subdistricts that overlay a high vulnerability DWSMA may be verified on the MN Dept of Health's Source Water Protection Web Map Viewer. Consider reviewing your wellhead protection plan to ensure that any future developments on the site align with your wellhead protection goals. Cumulative Potential Effects (Shawn James, 651-602-1233) According to EQB guidelines, the total impact on the environment may also be influenced by past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects outside of the AUAR area. The AUAR needs to show the cumulative impact of previous actions in adjacent developments and as a result of developments that exceeded the development magnitude that was evaluated in the original AUAR. Page - 3 I October 14, 2025 I METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 403 We believe that the inaccuracies and inconsistencies in this letter can be readily addressed by the City. We look forward to working with you to resolve these issues as quickly as possible. We request that the City work with Shawn James, Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1233 or via email at Shawn.James(a�metc.state.mn.us to set up a meeting at the earliest opportunity. As always, you may also contact your Sector Representative, Mackenzie Young Walters at 651-602-1373 or via email at MacKenzie.Young-Walters@metc.state.mn.us. Sincerely, Angela R. Torres, AICP, Senior Manager Local Planning Assistance Attachment (Met Council response letter dated March 23, 2020) CC: Environmental Quality Board Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT Metro LisaBeth Barajas, Executive Director, Community Development MacKenzie Young -Walters, Sector Representative Shawn James, Principal Reviewer Reviews Coordinator N: I CommDev\LPAI Communities\Shakopeel Letters\ Shakopee 2025 Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update Objection 22373- 3.docx Page - 4 I October 14, 2025 I METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 404 March 23, 2020 Mark Noble, Senior Planner City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee MN 55379 RE: Shakopee Jackson Township Development Area Revised Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Metropolitan Council Review File No. 22373-2 Metropolitan Council District No. 4 Dear Mr. Noble: Metropolitan Council staff completed its review of the Jackson Township Development Area Revised Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) to determine its accuracy and completeness in addressing regional concerns. While we find that AUAR does not raise any major issues of consistency with council policies. the staff review has concluded that the Revised AUAR is not complete as it relates to the development scenarios. Council staff offer the following comments: AUAR Process (Raya Esmaelli, 651-602-1616) The Revised AUAR is incomplete. The No Build scenario needs to reflect the comprehensive plan that is currently in effect (Minn. Rules 4410.3610, subp 3). The Revised AUAR incorrectly asserts that the No Build scenario reflects the ..adopted Comprehensive Plan." The City of Shat opee's 2040 Comprehensive Plan has been authorized by the Metropolitan Council and adopted by the City on November 19, 2019. Therefore, the 2030 Plan is no longer in effect and cannot be referenced as such. Based on the above -referenced rules, an AUAR must specify more than one scenario of anticipated development. one of which has to be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan. At least one scenario must be consistent with any known development plans of property owners within the area. Since the No Build scenario is invalid as described. the AUAR essentially only presents one development scenario based on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Therefore. the AUAR does not comply with an AUAR review process. According to the AUAR guidance available on the Environmental Quality Board's website: "Whenever a certain impact may or may not occur, depending on the exact design of future developments, the AUAR should cover the possible impacts through a "worst case scenario:; analysis or else prevent the impacts through the provisions of the mitigation plan. Failure to cover possible impacts by one of these means risks the invalidation of the environmental review exemption for specific development projects. - The project magnitude data based on the 2040 Plan (Attachment B, Tables 2a through 2g), does not assess the maximum impact of potential development based on the planned land uses. 390 Robert Street North I Saint Paul, MN 55101-1805 P. 651.602.1000 I TTY. 651.291.0904 I metrocouncil.org An Equal Opportunity Employer METROPOL1T' c o u N c 405 Mark Noble, City of Shakopee March 23. 2020 Page 2 For example. in Attachment B, Table 2a shows 22 acres of Mixed Residential land in subarea A. The allowable density range for the Mixed Residential uses is 6-30 units per acre at 90% residential share. Therefore. in 22 acres. there is the potential for a minimum of 119 units and a maximum of 594 units. Table 2a identifies the number of units as 91. which is lower than even the minimum allowed. In order for the AUAR to adequately assess the potential for environmental impacts. it must include a scenario that reflects the maximum allowable development under the guided land uses in the 2040 Plan . The AUAR may also include a more moderate scenario that falls somewhere within the developable range. Wastewater (Roger Janzig, ro er. janzi @metc. state.f7111 . us) When Interceptor (9206) was constructed in 1995, a cost sharing agreement was entered into between the Metropolitan Council and the city covering additional trunk sewer capacity costs for the City. In accordance with the agreement, the city must purchase additional capacity in the interceptor. after flows within the interceptor, at Townline Avenue. reach 3 cubic feet per second peak flow. or 571,000 gallons per day (gpd) averaged. The Revised AUAR reflects the proposed development of an Orderly Annexation Area (OAA) that will trigger the purchase of additional capacity in MCES Interceptor 9206. Forecasts (Todd Graham, 651-602-1322) The AUAR describes 1,753 housing units and 9.9 million sq. ft. of commercial. industrial. and office floorspace added on a subtotal of 1.364 acres. These results far exceed Metropolitan Council's 2040 forecast for this area. The City explains: "For the purposes of the AUAR, the analysis assumed the full build of each development scenario. Therefore. the resulting socio-economic totals utilized within the AUAR are higher than those assumed within the 2030 and 040 Comprehensive Plans." However, these numbers do not match the information included in the detailed project magnitude data in Tables 2a through 2g. For example. Table 2a shows 91 units of Mixed Residential, 31 units of Mixed Employment Center, and 161 units of Suburban Residential. These units add up to 283 units and not the 334 units mentioned in this table. TAZ allocation of the 2040 forecast was included in the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Plan), adopted in 2019. The eventual development will affect the TA . forecast allocation for this area. and potentially the city-wide forecast. Specifically: • The AUAR discusses 400% more commercial, industrial, and office floorspace (9.7 million sq. ft.) in subarea D (TAZ 2116) and subareas A and B (TAZ 21 77) than has previously been discussed. The City's earlier TAZ forecast allocation assigns 2020- 2040 employment growth of 2.081 jobs to these combined subareas (zones). • The AUAR discusses 900% more housing (747 units) in subarea C (TAZ 2180) and subareas E and G (TAZ 2176) than has previously been discussed. The City's earlier TAZ forecast allocation assigns 2020-2040 households growth of 72 households to these combined subareas (zones). For development within the 2040 planning period. the City expects to prepare a comprehensive plan amendment. That amendment should explicitly discuss revision of the community -wide forecast and TAZ forecast allocations. and the Council can consider the request. 406 Park Noble, City of Shakopee March 23, 2020 Page 3 Land Use (Raya E r ae/i, 651-602-1616) If the City decides to move forward with the scenario currently identified as No Build, as noted under item 6, a comprehensive plan amendment to the 2040 Plan will be necessary to reflect the change in land use guiding based on the AUAR. The AUAR describes the proposed land uses of each subdistrict on page 9. It should be noted that subdistrict A also includes a Mixed -Use Center area in the City's 2040 PlannedLand Use, Moreover. subdistrict E is described as having a narrow strip of open space. which is not included in the 2040 Planned Land Use, and it also includes a small Mixed Residential area in the middle. A comprehensive plan amendment to the 2040 Plan may be necessary to reflect changes in land use guiding based on the AUAR. Cumulative Potential Effects (Raya Esmaeili, 651-602-1616) According to EQB guidelines, the total impact on the environment may also be influenced by past. present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects outside of the AUAR area. The AUAR needs to show the cumulative impact of previous actions in adjacent developments, specifically in the more recent development in areas between subareas A and E. The Council will not take formal action on the AUAR. If you have any questions or need further information. please contact Raya Esmaeili, Principal Reviewer. at 651-602-1616. Sincerely. Angela R. Torres. AICP. Manager Local Planning Assistance CC: Tod Sherman. Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT - Metro Division Deb Barber, Metropolitan Council District 4 Judy Sventek, Water Resources Manager Raya Esmaeili. Sector Representative/Principal Reviewer/Reviews Coordinator N.\CommDeviLPA\Communities\ShakopeelLetterskShakopee 2020 Jackson Twp Revised AUAR 22373-2. docx 407 From: Munsell, Anneka (She/Her/Hers) (MDH) <Anneka.Munsell@state.mn.us> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 7:38 PM To: Mark Noble <MNoble@ShakopeeMN.gov> Cc: Shea, Abby (She/Her/Hers) (MDH) <Abby.Shea@state.mn.us>; Bell, David (MDH) <david.bell@state.mn.us>; Woodside, John (MDH) <john.woodside@state.mn.us>; Robertson, Steve (MDH) <steve.robertson@state.mn.us> Subject: MDH comments on Jackson Township AUAR Good evening, Please see the attached comments regarding the AUAR update for Jackson Township Development Area. Please reach out if you have any questions. Anneka Munsell PE Hydrologist I Source Water Protection Minnesota Department of Health Office: 651-201-5841 mDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 408 m� DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Protecting, Maintaining and Improving the Health of All Minnesotans October 14, 2025 Mark Noble Senior Planner — City of Shakopee 485 Gorman St Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mark Noble, Thank you for providing the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) with the opportunity to comment on the Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the Jackson Township Development Area. The mission of MDH is to protect, maintain, and improve the health of all Minnesotans. The careful planning and development of projects such as this one supports this mission and is an important step in ensuring health in all policies. Section 14 states there has been no change in water supply and water quality from the original AUAR. However, the original data is out of date and should be updated. MDH has the following comments for Section 14 of this AUAR: Figure 3 shows Shakopee's wellhead protection area rather than the Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). Additionally, Bonnevista Terrace Mobile Home Park, Jackson Heights Mobile Home Park, Mobile Manor Mobile Home Park, and Brookhaven Development have all defined DWSMAs since 2020. These should be included on the map. A significant portion of the DWSMAs within the update area are highly vulnerable to surface contamination. There is no discussion on potential contamination and mitigation. Shakopee, Brookhaven Development, and Mobile Manor Mobile Home Park all have wells with significant nitrate contamination. This is not mentioned in the AUAR or plans to prevent increasing nitrate contamination. The tabulation of wells is incomplete. There are other public water supply wells within the project area. Exact locations of public supply wells are non-public, but consider reaching out to MDH to mitigate risk to public supply wells. Additionally there are likely domestic wells not in the County Well Index. Any homes not connected to a public water supply can be assumed to have a well. This should be noted in the plan. Shakopee now has 16 primary water supply wells, not the eight as specified in the plan. The wells mostly use water from the Jordan Sandstone aquifer, not the Prairie du Chien — Jordan aquifer. Consider working with Shakopee Public Utilities to ensure the most up to date information on water supply is included in the AUAR. An equal opportunity employer. 409 PAGE 2 OF 2 DRAFT ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW FOR THE JACKSON TOWNSHIP DEVELOPMENT AREA OCTOBER 14, 2025 Stormwater management and spill response should consider the nearby public water supply wells and domestic supply wells. Public water supply wells are within the site. Spill response plans should include notification of nearby well owners, both public and private. Because part of the site is in a high vulnerability DWSMA, there are limits on where infiltration can take place. There is no discussion of where the ponds or infiltration areas may be located to limit potential impacts to drinking water supplies. Health starts where we live, learn, work, and play. To create and maintain healthy Minnesota communities, we must think in terms of health in all policies. Thank you again for the opportunity to provide comments on this Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review for the Jackson Township Development Area. Feel free to contact Anneka Munsell at (651) 201-5841 or anneka.munsell@state.mn.us if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Digitally signed by Anneka Anneka Munsell Munsell Date: 2025.10.14 19:36:21 -05'00' Anneka Munsell, PE Source Water Protection District Hydrologist Environmental Health Division Minnesota Department of Health PO Box 64975 Saint Paul, MN 55164-0975 CC. David Bell, MDH, Environmental Review Coordinator John Woodside, MDH, Hydrologist Supervisor Steve Robertson, MDH, Source Water Protection Manager Abby Shea, MDH, Source Water Protection Planner 410 From: Jenson, Craig <CJenson@co.scott.mn.us> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 4:05 PM To: Mark Noble <MNoble@ShakopeeMN.gov> Subject: SH Shakopee Jackson AUAR Update Found a typo closing out... use this one please. 411 SCOTT COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION r / _ PROGRAM DELIVERY • TRAFFIC • HIGHWAY OPERATIONS • MOBILITY MANAGEMENT U GOVERNMENT CENTER EAST, 200 FOURTH AVENUE WEST •SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 (952) 496-8346 • Fax: (952) 496-8365 • www.scottcountymn.gov October 14, 2025 Mark Noble City of Shakopee 485 Gorman St. Shakopee, MN 55379 SUBJECT: Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update Dear Mark, We have reviewed the AUAR update and have provided the following comments: • The County appreciates the City's efforts in continuing to understand the needs of future County Road improvements in the annexation area. While some previous mitigation options now say "mitigation may no longer be needed", it should be clear in the document text that these mitigation recommendations are only based on volume assumptions. Other factors like safety or policy may require or necessitate future improvements. • The CH 78 and Zumbro Avenue intersection will be monitored, and mitigation will be implemented in the future if necessary. However, a signal or roundabout would not meet our spacing requirements for the planned Future Principal Arterial. • Any signalization will need to meet signal warrants. It is assumed that a future signal will be constructed at Vierling and CH 69 when warrants are met. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the AUAR. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Craig Jenson Transportation Planning Manager An Equal Opportunity/Safety Aware Employer 412 Alicia Bock From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Mark Noble <MNoble@ShakopeeMN.gov> Noble@ShakopeeM N.gov> Wednesday, October 29, 2025 5:09 PM Lydia Statz; Alicia Bock; Brent Clark; Jana Guseynova Michael Kerski; Alex Jordan FW: MnDOT Development Review I AUAR25-012 Jackson Township Development Area AUAR25-012 Jackson Township Development Area.pdf External Sender Warning: This message was sent from an external sender. Do not click on any links or open any attachments unless you know and trust the sender. Just received, but wanted to share for your info. Mark Noble Senior Planner, Planning Division 485 Gorman St., Shakopee MN 55379 (952) 233-9348 I mnoble@ShakopeeMN.govIwww.ShakopeeMN.gov From: Burstein, Regina (She/Her/Hers) (DOT) <Regina.Burstein@state.mn.us> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2025 4:38 PM To: Mark Noble <MNoble@ShakopeeMN.gov> Cc: Swenson, Jason (DOT) <Jason.Swenson@state.mn.us>; Craig, E (DOT) <buck.craig@state.mn.us>; Lundquist, Mark (DOT) <mark.lundquist@state.mn.us>; Ramic, Almin (DOT) <almin.ramic@state.mn.us>; Patel, Amrish (DOT) <amrish.patel@state.mn.us>; Ries, Natalie (DOT) <natalie.ries@state.mn.us>; Langenbach, Diane (DOT) <diane.langenbach@state.mn.us>; Gardner, Heather (DOT) <Heather.Gardner@state.mn.us>; Kowski, Michael (DOT) <michael.p.kowski@state.mn.us>; McCormick, Molly (She/Her/Hers) (DOT) <Molly.McCormick@state.mn.us>; Olson, Jordan (DOT) <jordan.olson@state.mn.us>; Sherman, Tod (DOT) <tod.sherman@state.mn.us>; Muhic, P Cameron (DOT) <cameron.muhic@state.mn.us>; Shaffer, Scott (He/Him/His) (DOT) <Scott.Shaffer@state.mn.us>; joseph.widing@metc.state.mn.us Subject: MnDOT Development Review I AUAR25-012 Jackson Township Development Area Hello Mark, Thank you for submitting the Jackson Township Development Area AUAR for review. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has reviewed the plans and has provided comments in the attached letter. Feel free to contact me with any questions. Thank you, Regina Burstein Senior Transportation Planner MnDOT Metro District regina.burstein@state.mn.us 651.234.7785 1 413 DEPARTME TRAhJSPOR 2 414 rnDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Metropolitan District 1500 County Road B-2 West Roseville, MN 55113 October 29, 2025 Mark Noble Senior Planner City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 SUBJECT: Jackson Township Development Area MnDOT DOT Review #AUAR25-012 NE and SE Quadrants of US 169 and MN 41 Jackson Township, Scott County Dear Mark Noble, Thank you for the opportunity to review the Jackson Township Development Area AUAR. Please note that MnDOT's review of this AUAR does not constitute approval of a regional traffic analysis and is not a specific approval for access or new roadway improvements. As plans are refined, we would like the opportunity to coordinate with our partners and to review the updated information. MnDOT's staff has reviewed the document and has the following comments: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions Since 2023, Minnesota lawmakers have made changes to state laws to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and fight climate change. The key changes include: • Setting a goal for the state to reach "net zero" emissions by the year 2050. That means balancing the amount of emissions released with the amount that can be removed from the air. • Requiring the Commissioner of Transportation to create targets for reducing emissions from cars, trucks and other transportation sources. • Making road projects that increase vehicle capacity take steps to offset the emissions and extra driving those projects may cause. Because this AUAR proposes expansion of Minnesota Highway 41 as part of its mitigation, any proposed highway expansion would trigger a GHG Impact Assessment. A project that adds lane capacity of more than a half mile (2,500ft) or creates a new interchange on the highway system will need to assess the added tailpipe emissions and vehicle miles travels (VMT). Capacity expansion projects will assess increased emissions from increased VMT that the added lanes or interchange will generate over 20 years. Using the same vehicle fleet assumptions for gas, hybrid and electric vehicles over the time period, the assessment will isolate the emissions added under the build scenario. Projects can offset GHG/VMT using any of the following nine offset categories identified by the legislature: • Transit expansion • Transit service improvements • Active transportation infrastructure (biking and walking) • Micromobility • Transportation demand management • Parking management Page 1 of 3 415 • Land use changes (residential, mixed -use, transit -orientated) • Infrastructure improvements related to traffic operations • Natural systems There is procedure guidance to assess GHG emission impact here: How to assess project impacts and offset (PDF) Water Resources A MnDOT drainage permit is required before any development occurs. The permit applicant shall demonstrate that the off -site runoff entering MnDOT drainage system(s) and/or right of way will not increase. The drainage permit application, including the information below, should be submitted online to: https://olpa.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/. Please upload this letter with the drainage permit application. The following information must be submitted with the drainage permit application: 1. Grading plans, drainage plans, and hydraulic calculations demonstrating that proposed flows to MnDOT right of way remain the same as existing conditions or are reduced. 2. Existing and proposed drainage area maps with flow arrows and labeling that corresponds with the submitted calculations. 3. Hydro CAD model and PDF of output for the 2, 10, and 100 -year Atlas 14 storm events. Once a drainage permit application is submitted, a thorough review will be completed and additional information may be requested. Please contact Jason Swenson, Water Resources Engineering, at jason.swenson@state.mn.us or 651-234-7539 with any questions. Permits Any work that affects MnDOT right of way will require an appropriate permit. All permits are available and must be applied at: https://olpa.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/. Upload this letter when applying for permits. For questions regarding permit submittal requirements, please contact Buck Craig of MnDOT's Metro District Permits Section at buck.craig@state.mn.us or 651-775-0405. Review Submittal Options MnDOT's goal is to complete reviews within 30 calendar days. Review materials received electronically can be processed more rapidly. Do not submit files via a cloud service or SharePoint link. In order of preference, review materials may be submitted as: 1. Email documents and plans to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us. Attachments may not exceed 20 MB (megabytes) per email. Documents can be zipped as well. If multiple emails are necessary, number each email. 2. Files over 20 MB can also be uploaded to MnDOT's Web Transfer Client site: https://mft.dot.state.mn.us. Contact metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us, and staff will create a shared folder in which files can be uploaded to. Please send an accompanying email with a narrative for the development. You are welcome to contact me at regina.burstein@state.mn.us with any questions. Page 2 of 3 416 Sincerely, Regina Burstein Senior Planner Copy sent via email: Jason Swenson, Water Resources Buck Craig, Permits Mark Lundquist, Right of Way Almin Ramic, Traffic Amrish Patel, Transit Natalie Ries, Noise Diane Langenbach, Area Coordinator Heather Gardner, Design Michael Kowski, Maintenance Molly McCormick, Ped/Bike/ADA Planning Jordan Olson, Surveying Tod Sherman, Planning Cameron Muhic, Planning Scott Shaffer, Planning Joseph Widing, Metropolitan Council Page 3 of 3 417 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL December 19, 2025 Mark Noble, Senior Planner City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: City of Shakopee — Jackson Township Development Area — Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Update Metropolitan Council Review File No. 22373-3 Metropolitan Council District No. 4 Dear Mark Noble: The Metropolitan Council received the Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update (AUAR Update) on September 30, 2025. The AUAR Update represents the 5 -year update required under environmental rules, encompassing a study area of approximately 2,889 acres located west and south of City of Shakopee limits. The AUAR Update analyzed two development scenarios, a Build scenario based on the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan and a No Build scenario based on the City's and Scott County's 2030 Comprehensive Plans. Since the No Build scenario must reflect the comprehensive plan that is currently in effect, not a previous version of the City's plan, the Metropolitan Council issued a formal objection on October 14, 2025. Metropolitan Council staff appreciates meeting with City staff and its consultants on October 21, 2025 to discuss adding another development scenario and ensuring consistency in development projections across studies, updating the water supply needs table, adding language acknowledging the Interceptor Agreement Statement between the City and the Metropolitan Council, and adding information to the cumulative potential effects section to account for past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects within and adjacent to the AUAR study area. The meeting and follow-up information provided on October 30, 2025 allowed Council staff to present specific concerns regarding the development scenarios and projections and provided the City with an opportunity to present additional background information. A revised AUAR Update addressing the Council's comments was received on December 12, 2025, which included a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Scenario, a Max Build Scenario, and a 2025 AUAR Update Scenario. It is now clear to Council staff that the number of development scenarios is adequate, and the scenarios are consistent throughout the AUAR Update. Council staff encourages the City to further explore and refine potential development scenarios as it develops its 2050 Comprehensive Plan. The Council also provides the following advisory comments: AUAR Process (Shawn James, 651-602-1233) The 2040 Comprehensive Plan scenario projects 30 households in subarea C. Council staff understand this estimate is based on the planned land uses provided by the City's and County's 2040 Comprehensive Plans. However, the County shows a large portion of subarea C under its Urban Reserve land use with the understanding that it will be developed under the City's planned land uses upon annexation. With the next AUAR Update, Council staff encourage the City to include projections reflective of potential full build -out under the City's future land use plan in each of its development scenarios and not limited by current jurisdiction or development likelihood within 5 years. Forecasts (Todd Graham, 651-602-1322) Metropolitan Council (Regional Office & Environmental Services) 390 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101-1805 P 651.602.1000 I F 651.602.1550 I TTY 651.291.0904 metrocouncil.org An Equal Opportunity Employer 418 The AUAR describes three scenarios: a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Scenario, a Max Build Scenario, and a 2025 AUAR Update Scenario. The last of these, the 2025 AUAR Update Scenario, includes 2,918 housing units, 70,000 sq ft of retail space, 3.1 million square ft of other commercial, industrial, and office floor space, and 3,551 total jobs (see table 11). These results exceed Met Council's 2050 forecast for this area. Met Council staff have prepared a TAZ allocation of the 2050 forecast. The eventual development will affect the TAZ forecast allocation for this area, and potentially the citywide forecast. Specifically: • The 2025 AUAR Update scenario discusses 2,918 housing units in the AUAR area. Met Council's allocation assigns a growth of 1,826 households in affected TAZs from 2022 to 2050. The difference is most substantial in subarea C (TAZ 2180), where the AUAR discusses 1,372 housing units; Met Council has allocated growth of 300 households in that zone. • The 2025 AUAR Update scenario discusses 3,551 jobs and more commercial, industrial, and office floor space than has previously been discussed. The AUAR Update focuses 98.5% of the nonresidential development in subareas A and B (TAZ 2177) and subarea D (TAZ 2116). Met Council's allocation assigns employment growth of 1,691 jobs in affected TAZs from 2022 to 2050. The floorspace analysis in the AUAR Update implies substantially more employment and households by an order of magnitude. Met Council staff advise a discussion of TAZ allocations of growth to align expectations during the City's preparation of a 2050 Plan Update. Water Appropriation (Lilia Franklin, 651-602-1179) Should future water demand in the project area surpass current water supply capacity, the City should work with the DNR to obtain necessary appropriation permit(s) when they wish to drill a new well. Wastewater (Roger Janzig, roger.janzig@metc.state.mn.us) The Updated AUAR includes the 2040 Comp Plan Scenario, Max Build Scenario, and 2025 AUAR Update Scenario. The City must purchase additional capacity in the interceptor, after flows within the interceptor, at Townline Avenue, reach 3 cubic feet per second peak flow, or 571,000 gallons per day (gpd) averaged. Based on the submitted revisions and the City's assurance that the Council's concerns will receive further consideration during the 2050 Comprehensive Plan Update, the Council withdraws its objection to the Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update. Sincerely, Angela Torres, Senior Manager Local Planning Assistance CC: Environmental Quality Board Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT Metro Deb Barber, Metropolitan Council District No. 4 LisaBeth Barajas, Executive Director, Community Development Angela Torres, Senior Manager, Local Planning Assistance MacKenzie Young -Walters, Sector Representative Shawn James, Principal Reviewer Reviews Coordinator N:ICommDevILPAICommunities\ShakopeelLetters\Shakopee 2025 Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update Objection Withdrawal 22373-3.docx Page - 2 I December 19, 2025 I METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 419 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 11.a January 6, 2026 City Bill List Becky Smith, Accounting Specialist Action to be considered: Review of City Bill List Motion Type: Informational only Background: The City Bill has been provided to the City Council. Recommendation: Review of City Bill List Budget Impact: N/A Attachments: 420 SHAKOPEE Agenda Item: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Shakopee City Council 11.b January 6, 2026 News and Announcements Rick Parsons Action to be considered: No action, item is informational only. Motion Type: Informational only Background: Announcements and Upcoming Events: - Shakopee Board and Commission Recruiting • The City of Shakopee is seeking volunteers to serve on its boards and commissions. Two seats will be available on the Planning Commission/Board of Adjustment and Appeals, one seat will be available on the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission, and one seat will be available on the Police Civil Service Commission. To learn more and apply, please visit www.shakopeemn.gov. Application deadline is Friday, January 16, 2026. Recommendation: Please review the information on upcoming news and announcements. Budget Impact: N/A. Attachments: 421