The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About15.A.4. Publication of the Countryside Environmental Assessment Worksheet I~. Pc. l\ . CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum CONSENT CASE NO.: 04-067 TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R, Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Worksheet MEETING DATE: September 7, 2004 INTRODUCTION Tollefson Development has previously requested the preparation. of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W) for the development area it is calling Countryside. Countryside is located south of Highway 169 and east of County Road 79. WSB and Associates, on behalf of the City, has completed the preparation of the EA W. Staff is now requesting that the City Council approve the distribution of the EAW to agencies for review and comment. ACTION REQUESTED Move to approve the distribution ofthe Countryside EA W. ~4;~/~~L R. Michael Leek Community Development Director Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor, City of Shakopee City Council, City of Shako pee From: Ryan Hughes, WSB Andi Moffatt, WSB September 2, 2004 Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Worksheet WSB Project No. 1281-69 Attached,. please find a draft copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W) for the Countryside Residential Development for your review. The purpose of the EA W is to identify potential environmental impacts associated with the project and determine whether or not an Environmental Impact Statement is needed. Based on Minnesota Rules 4410.4300, the EA W for this project is mandatory due to the number of residential units. The EA W process is required to be completed prior to the City issuing any approvals for this project. The attached EA W evaluates the "full build" scenario for the Countryside Residential Development site and identifies potential environmental impacts and mitigation measures for these impacts. The full build scenario is evaluated as part of the EA W since impacts can generally be reduced by reducing density, but if density increases beyond what was evaluated in the EA W, a new EA W must be completed. The EA W is being submitted to the City Council for authorization for public distribution of the EA Was required by Minnesota Rules 4410. Upon authorization by the City Council, the EA W will be distributed for a 30-day public comment period. At the end of the comment period, responses to comments will be developed and a recommendation as to the need for an Environmental Impact Statement will be made to the City Council for consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to call one of us at (763)541-4800. Michael Leek, City of Shakopee Development Director Bret Weiss, WSB Don Sterna, WSB Matthew Weiland, Tollefson Development F:\ WPWlN\1281-69\090204citycouDcil. doc Minneapolis. S1. Cloud. Equal Opportunity Employer . .;; I I I I Countryside Residential Development RGU: SHAKOPEE EQB Publication Date: September 13, 2004 City of Shakopee EAW Comment Deadline:.october 13, 2004 Michael Leek 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 ~ WSB & Associates, Inc. WSB Project No. 1281-69 - '..I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Note to preparers: This form is available at www.mnplan.state.mn.us. EA W Guidelines will be available in Spring 1999 at the web site. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EA W is prepared by the Responsible Governmental Unit or its agents to determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared. The project proposer must supply any reasonably accessible data for - but should not complete - the final worksheet. If a complete answer does not fit in the space allotted, attach additional sheets as necessary. The complete question as well as the answer must be included if the EA W is prepared electronically. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and complet~mess of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. Tables, Figures, andAppendices attached to the EAW: . County map showing the general location of the project; . United States Geological Survey 7.5 minute, I :24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy acceptable); . Site plan showing all significant project and natural features. These items are attached in Appendix A and B. TDD (for hearing and speech impaired only); (651) 282-5332 Printed on recycled paper containing 30%fibersfrom paper recycled by consumers . '.; The City of Shakopeehas prepared an EA W for the Countryside Residential Development. This development includes construction of 449 single-family homes on 172-acres located in the southeastern comer of US Highway 169 and County Road 15. Tollefson Development Company is proposing a residential development consisting of 449 single family residences on 172 acres. All housing types will be owner occupied. The open space within the site is proposed to contain stonn water ponds, wetlands, public parks, and private open space buffers. Currently, the primary land use within the project site is agriculture. The site contains 120 acres of cropland, 3 acres of wetland, 1 acre of wooded area, 35 acres of grassland, and 2 acres of lawn/landscaping~ After construction, the site will include 87 acres oflawn/landscaping, 53 acres of impervious surfaces, 5 acres of new ponding area, 3 acres of wetland, and 24 acres of park/open space. It should be noted that the cover type amounts are only estimates and are subject to change as part of the plan review process. The project site is bounded on the north by Highway 169, on the west by County Road 15, and on the east by County Road 79. The project area extends approximately ~ mile south of Highway 169 and 1 mile east and west along Highway 169 at the greatest extent. The site is anticipated to be graded in one phase each to install sewer and water, construct streets, and building pads~ Prior to the commencement of each site grading operation, erosion control and other Best Management Practices will be implemented. The grading plan will incorporate on-site ponding for stonn water treatment and rate control. These erosion control measures will remain in place until all construction on-site is completed and the site is stabilized as required by MPCA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II constructionpennit requirements. The construction methods are anticipated to be the conventional earthwork methods for site grading that include earthmoving scrapers; bulldozers, backhoes, and vibratory compactors. The public utilities will, also be constructed with conventional practices utilizing l:>ackhoes, bulldozers, and compactors for excavation and backfill in the utility trenches. The streets will consist of a gravel base, with asphalt base and wear placed upon it and confined by sunnountable concrete curb and gutter. Project construction grading is anticipated to begin in 2005 and be completed in the spring of2006. Construction of the residential homes will follow this phase and is anticipated to be completed in 2009. The ultimate.development schedule will depend on market co,nditions. The purpose of the project is to provide residential housing within the City of Shakopee. A government unit is not carrying out this proj ect Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Shakopee,~ll1nesota 2 Worksheet . '"' Outlots are included in the development and will contain park, storm water ponds, and wetlands. The environmental assessment of these outlots. is included in this document. ~.I/Y< iDBJ!".' ,]~qY<1i,,,,,,,.1!:1:1,~ bk' ift3<'ftl"~*''''''1;1#qE*, . S,t&.II,,< d't",,~> ,I!II/Rlr #if' ",,,lt~' ",,!u. .~..< e ..~,=~tiPJl!~. ~J\elD; ;",\P'~,"i>F m~ll1Jl:~J},;:'$!Dm~_Jj~';J;l1~ill(n~~,l,~J . 4~' Not Applicable The Concept Development plan for the project site details the lot sizes and locations related to the ponds, wetlands, and open space. A copy of the plan is included in Appendix B. Unit of Government Type of Application Status Federal Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Permit To be obtained, if needed .. State MPCA .. NPDES storm water permit To be obtained MPCA Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit To be obtained MPCA Section 401 Certification To be obtained, if needed Minnesota DNR Water Appropriation To be obtained, if needed Minnesota Department of Health Water Main Extension Permit To be obtained , City/Local Scott County Access Permit To be obtained Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Shakopee, Minnesota 3 Worksheet . Ci ee/Scott Coun Plattin To be com leted ..... Ci Rezonin To be obtained Ci Buildin Permits To be obtained Ci Site Plan Review To be com leted WCA Permit To be obtained, if needed Gradin Permit To be obtained It is not the objective ofthe EAW preparation to develop all the detailed information required for construction permits. The project proposer will assemble the required information and apply for these permits when appropriate. Recent pastland use in the project area is primarily agricultural and a horse training facilities. According to the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (ML~CS) summary for northern Scott County, land cover for the area within theproj ect site is designated as planted or cultivated vegetation. Two residential single family homes are located within the project site. The residential homestead accessible from County Road 15 includes a single story house, horse barn/stable, and three garages. The residential home accessible from County Road 77 is part of the Shakopee Valley Training Farm. This farmstead site contains a two story farmhouse, equipment barn, and the following wood structures: garage, shop, shed, privy, hen-house, well house, an animal barn, and three horse stables. A Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment has been completed for both the Voxland Property/Shakdpee Training Farm located between County Road 15 and County Road 77 on February 14,2003 and the Theis Property located between County Road 77 and County Road 79 on January 30, 2003. According to the Phase I Environmental Assessment no known environmental hazards are present on the Theis property. The V O)dand Property/Shakopee Training Farm Phase I Environmental Assessment concluded that a solid waste dump and surficial staining was present within the areas evaluated. The solid waste dump and contaminated soil present on the site are to be removed from the site prior to grading and be dealt with according to state regulations. The City of Shako pee Comprehensive Plan (Updates 1999 and January 2004) City-Wide Land Use Plan has guided the project site and the surrounding area as Medium Density Residential and Commercial. The area guided as commercial is the western portion ofthe project site adjacent to County Road 15. Within the Comprehensive Plan Update the amount and pace of future urban growth is reliant on the regional sanitary sewer and the allocation of Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) from the Metropolitan Council. Most of Shakopee has been placed in the region's illustrative 2020 MUSA according to Metropolitan Council's Regional Blueprint. In this respect, expanded urban growth within Shakopee is consistent with regional policy. Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Shakopee, Minnesota 4 Worksheet - ... The areas are estimates and may change during the plan review process. Impervious surface calculated estimating area as 40% of each lot. A general site visit was conducted on August 10, 2004 of the project site. The following summarizes the wildlife resources and habitats observed during the visit. The wildlife on this site is a result of the plant communities present. The three prominent plant communities on the project site include wooded/forested areas, brush/grassland, and agricultural fields. W oodedIF orest The wooded areas are found in the surrounding wind breaks, erosion protection belts, and along the north side of the horse training farm. The dominant species observed within the tree strata was Eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides). The Eastern cottonwood provides an ecological function to the area by reducing the impacts of soil erosion and providing a visual barrier of Highway 169. According to the wetland delineation completed by Acorn Environmental Consultants the dominant tree strata species along the intermittent stream included boxelder, American elm, green ash, and basswood. The density of the wooded/forested areas does not function as a significant ecological corridor for other living organisms. Brush/Grassland The brush/grassland areas are located within the horse training farm and the Voxland property along County Road 15. These areas consisted of grazed open grassland. The vegetation observed on the site was disturbed from agricultural and residential activity. Vegetation within the horse training area was generally grazed to within a few inches of the ground.. According to the wetland delineation completed by Acorn Environmental Consultants the dominant vegetation within the wetland area included reed canary grass and wood nettle. Agriculture Land use for most of the project area during the site visit consisted of agriculture. Agricultural uses for the site included crops such as corn and hay. The area included the entire project site between County Road 77 and County Road 79 as well as the north side of the horse training farm along the west side of County Road 77 and the east side of the residential property along County Road 15. Wildlife Wildlife typical of agricultural and grazed grassland areas including pheasants, fox, rabbits, birds, gophers, chipmunks, mice, skunks, muskrats, raccoons, and squirrels, are believed to be in the vicinity of the project site. Birds observed during a site visit August 2004 include American crow, blackbirds, sparrows, Tree Swallows, and Barn Swallows. Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Shakopee, Minnesota 5 Worksheet . Reptiles and amphibians likely to be found on the site include garter snakes, ring necked snakes, .. frogs, and toads. Preservation of the buffer around the intermittent stream and wetland should aid in protecting this wildlife but only wildlife that can adapt to residential areas will remain. A reviewofthe Minnesota County Biological Survey was completed for the project site. No high quality natural areas or rare or threatened species were indicated within the project site. Based on the DNR Natural Heritage Database and site visit, there are no known endangered or rare species on or near the site. The letter from the DNR is included in Appendix D. The site does not contain any water bodies mapped on the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) or the Department of Natural Resources Public Waters Inventory (PWI). The site does contain approximately 2.7 acres of wetland as delineated by Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. on July 2, 2003 and January 30, 2003 (Report dated March 22, 2004). . The concept plan for the development includes approximately 0.1 acres of wetland impact. All delineated wetlands fall within the jurisdiction of the Local Government Unit (LGU) through the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). The LGU for this area is the City of Shakopee. The US Army Corps of Engineers (USCOE) may also have jurisdiction over some or all of these wetlands. A permit is required from the agencies having jurisdiction over the wetlands. The USCOE is beginning to require mitigation of wetland impacts at a 1.5:1 ratio with 1.5 acres of new wetland credit for every acre impacted. The WCA requires a minimum mitigation ratio of 2: I for jurisdictional impacts in Scott County, provided that sequencing has been completed. It is anticipated that the project sponsor will coordinate with the agency representatives having jurisdiction over these wetlands during the planning process. Wetland impacts for this project include filling part the wetland to construct the residential roads for the development. Measures have been taken to minimize wetland impacts to the greatest extent possible. The concept plan for the development is designed to preserve as much of the existing wetland as possible. The road (17ili Avenue) is necessary to provide two outlets from the development, connect County Road 15 to County Road 77, and to provide access to Highway 169 via County Road 15. It is anticipated that culverts will be placed where the impacts occur to provide conveyance of water within the stream. ~ Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Shakopee, Minnesota 6 Worksheet - '. , According to the Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessments completed for the project area two private residential wells are located within the site. The Shakopee Valley Training Farm parcel contains a well located north of the farmhouse that is enclosed in a small shed. The shed has a cistern approximately three feet in diameter. The well ,has reportedly been sealed. The V oxland parcel contains a well located west ofthehouse. No information regarding the status of this well was included in the report. All wells found within the project site w!ll be capped in conformance with state regulations. Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (SPUC) municipal water system currently consists of municipal wells that serve the City's urban water needs. The addition of new wells within the City of Shakopee is based on the City's population projections. Currently, SPUC averages one new well each year and projects that one new well will be added each year for the next five years to serve the City's growing population. The predicted future water demands for the Countryside Residential Development are based on estimating that each residential unit will use approximately 170 gallons/capita and a household of 2.5 persons/unit. This creates an estimated average daily demand of 190,825 GPD for the development and using a peaking factor of three the peak daily usage would be 572;475 GPD. The project site does not fall within the FEMA 100-yearflood plain or the Shoreline Zoning District according to the City of Shakopee Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan. No state or federally designated wild or scenic river land use district exists on the property according to the Minnesota DNR's Wild, Scenic, and Recreational Rivers map. Not Applicable The Soil Survey of Scott County, Minnesota (Index Map Sheets 3) shows the area soils that have steep slopes and/or are highly erodible as: . Dakota sandy loam, 6-12 percent slopes, moderately eroded (DbC2) . Hayden soils, 12-18 percent slopes, severely eroded (HcD3) Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Shakopee, Minnesota 7 Worksheet ~ . Hubbard loamy fine sand, 2-6 percent slopes (HeB) ~ . Waukegan silt loam, 2-6 percent slopes (WaB) These soils are discussed further in Question 19.B. of this EA W. The site is generally flat with gradually descending slopes towards the intermittent stream. The areas of concemduring construction arethe slopes around the existing wetland and intermittent stream. The developer will be required to provide additional stabilization measures when working on or near this area. These measures could include, but are not limited to, staggering silt fence, erosion control blankets, . temporary seeding, and the application of mulch. Erosion and sedimentation issues }\fill be addressed for the construction of the residential development during the MPCA NPDES Construction Permit application process: As part of this permit application process a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)will be required. The SWPPP will be required to address erosion and sediment control within the project site prior to construction until final stabilization or turf establishment on the site. According to the current City of Shakopee Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan, the project site is entirely located within the Mill Pond watershed basin. Surface water at the project site drains from the south to the north/northwest direction towards the Minnesota River. According to the Phase I Environmental Site Assessments completed for the project,. a creek located within the Shakopee Valley TrainingFarm parcel flows from the south to the northwest. .This creek flows onto the parcel from the south side and flows off the parcel at the middle of the west side of the parcel. A drainageway located at the east side of the V oxland parcel appears to drain surface water intermittently from the south to the northeast. The remainder of the project site located between County Road 77 and County Road 79 drains to the north under Highway 169 via a drainageway and culvert. Primary land use in this area is agriculture. The City's Comprehensive StormwaterManagement Plan states that the site is required to limit runoff rates within newly developing watersheds to 1/3 cfs per acre for the critical 1 OO-year storm or runoff event. The City's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan. also requires pretreatment of storm water in accordance with Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) guidelines prior to discharge from the site. These standards are required to be met by the project design. General ponding areas are shown on the figure in Appendix B. The City will also require the inclusion of skimmers in the construction of new pond outlets. Based on the storm water ~ management requirements of the City, storm water impacts will be mitigated on-site. The City is currently in the process of revising their storm water management plan to include more details on drainage requirements, ponding areas, and infiltration considerations for this site and others located within the Jackson Township Annexation Area. This site will need to meet the requirements of the plan revisions. Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Shakopee, Minnesota 8 Worksheet - ~ The City of Shakopee' s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan outlines storm water discharge directions and locations: The majority of the storm water from the site will be directed into on-site storm water treatment pond basins near Trunk Highway 169. The storm water treatment basins drain to culverts under Highway 169 and then enter the Shakopee upper valley drainageway. Discharge from the storm water ponds will be directed into the City's regional ponding system. The upper valley drainageway consists of regional ponds and an open ditch stormwater conveyance system that directs stormwater into the Minnesota River. The surface water outlet for the regional ponding system is located on the north side of the City near Cavanaugh Drive and Viking Steel Road. Currently, the peak channel flow for the 100-year event at this outlet is 716 cfs. The City's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan outlines policies for on-site retention and treatment. The City's policies for storm water infiltration, rate control, and treatment will minimize the impact of storm water on the water quality of receiving waters within the development and downstream, both now and in the future. Normal domestic sewage will be generated by the site and treated at Blue Lake Treatment Facility. It is estimated that this site will generate 123,026 gallons per day (GPD). The estimate assumes that each unit in the development will generate 274 GPD. Wastewater will not be treated on-site. Normal domestic sewage generated by the site will be treated at Blue Lake Treatment Facility. It is anticipated that sanitary sewer flow generated by the development can be accommodated by the City of Shakopee sanitary sewer system. The sanitary sewer system was constructed with the anticipation of future development in the area. Not Applicable Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Shakopee, Minnesota 9 Worksheet . ~ Based on the information from the Scott County Soil Survey, there are no known sink holes, shallow limestone formations, or karst conditions within the site. Groundwater in the area generally flows to the northwest. Information about groundwater and bedrock depths came from the Geological Atlas of Scott County, .MN. The Soil Survey of Scott County, Minnesota (Index Map Sheets 3) shows the following s?ils in the project area: . Dakota sandy loam, 0-2 percent slopes (DbA) Somewhat excessively drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace. The surface. soil granularity is a sandy loam. The soil permeability is very rapid and the available water capacity is low. Susceptible to wind erosion. . Dakota sandy loam, 2-6 percent slopes (DbB) Somewhat excessively drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace. The surface soil granularity is a sandy loam. The soil permeability is very rapid and the available water capacity is low. Susceptible to wind erosion and water erosion. . ^ Dakota sandy loam, 2-6 percent slopes, moderately eroded (DbB2) Somewhat excessively_drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace. The surface soil granularity is a sandy loam. The soil permeability is very rapid and the available water capacity is low. Susceptible to wind erosion and water erosion. . Dakota sandy loam, 6-12 percent slopes, moderately eroded (DbC2) Somewhat excessively drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace. The surface soil granularity is a sandy loam. The soil permeability is very rapid and the available water - capacity is low. Susceptible to wind erosion and water erosion. Potential for surface-water contamination. . Estherville loam and sandy loam, 0-2 percent slopes (EaA) Somewhat excessively drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace, outwash plain; or moraine. The surface soil granularity is loam. The soil permeability is very rapid and the available water capacity is low. . Estherville gravelly sandy loam (EaB) Somewhat excessively drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace, outwash plain, or moraine. The surface soil granularity is loam. The soil permeability is very rapid and the available water capacity is low. Susceptible to water erosion. Potential for surface- water cQntamination. Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Shakopee,~llrnesota 10 Worksheet . . Estherville loam and sandy loam (EaB2) . Somewhat excessively drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace, outwash plain, or moraine. The surface soil granularity is loam. The soil permeability is very rapid and the available water capacity is low. Previously eroded soil susceptible to water erosion. Potential for surface-water contamination. . Hayden soils, 12-18 percent slopes, severely eroded (HcD3) Well drained till soil characteristic of a moraine; The surface soil granularity is clay loam. A soil found on slopes containing limited organic matter, is'previously eroded, susceptible to water erosion, and the potential for surface-water contamination. . Hubbard loamy fme sand, 0-2 percent slopes (HeA) Excessively drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace. The surface soil granularity is.loamy fine sand. .The soil permeability is very rapid and the available water capacity is low. Limited organic matter content. Susceptible to wind erosion. . Hubbard loamy fine sand, 2-6 percent slopes (HeB) Excessively drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace. The surface soil granularity is loamy fine sand; The soil permeability is very rapid and the available water capacity is low. Susceptible to wind erosion. . Terrace escarpments (Ta) Variable glacial sediments characteristic of a terrace. . Waukegan silt loam, 0-2 percent slopes (WaA) . Well drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace. The surface soil granularity is silt loam. Soil permeability is excessive. . Waukegan silt loam, 2-6 percent slopes (WaB) Well drained outwash soil characteristic ofa stream terrace. The surface soil granularity is silt loam. The soil permeability is very rapid. Susceptible to wind erosion. Potential for surface-water contamination. Based on information from the Scott County Geological Atlas, the sensitivity of the, Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer to pollution is considered high in this area. The area is considered highly susceptible to contamination due to the thickness (<50 feet) of unconsolidated surficial material in the area. However, the proposed residential development is not anticipated to create the potential for groundwater contamination as hazardous waste will not be present on-site. Additionally, storm water will be pretreated prior to discharge to infiltration areas. Household municipal solid waste will be generated by this project. Municipal solid waste will be hauled away by local garbag~ haulers and residents will be encouraged to recycle. Countryside Residential Development Envrronrnentall\ssessment Shakopee, Minnesota 11 Worksheet . w . During construction, vehicles containing gasoline will be present on site. However, the potential for contamination is low and no toxic or hazardous materials will be present after construction. Not applicable Traffic Generation Dailv Traffic AM Peak PM Peak Countryside Site Single Family 449 units 4,297 337 454 Hioh School Site Phase 1 1,600 students 2,736 656 448 Expansion 800 students 1.368 328 224 Total Development Area 8,401 . 1,321 1,126 The estimated trip generation is based on information identified in the 7th Edition of the Institute of . Traffic Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip General Manual. Figures C-l and C-2, located in Appendix C, illustrate the traffic distribution for the proposed development, as well as the existing daily, AM peak, and PM peak hour traffic volumes on the impacted roadways. The existing traffic volumes are based on traffic volume counts conducted in August 2004. The traffic count worksheets are included in Appendix C. The proposed residential development is anticipated to be constructed and fully developed by 2009. In addition, the new proposed high school, including a future expansion, located adjacent to the proposed development, was also included as part of the overall traffic generation. The development impacts were analyzed for the year 2010 and 2025, assuming full build conditions for both time periods. The primary impacted roadways adjacent to the development are County Road (CR) 79 on the easterly border of the site, CR 77 running north/south through the center of the site, County State Aid Highway (CSAR) 15 on the western border of the site, andthe proposed 17th Avenue extension running east/west through the center of the site. The primary access to the development will be provided via access points on 17th Avenue, CR 77, and CR 79. The attached Figure C-3 shows the proposed 17th A venue alignment and the anticipated access points to the proposed development; as well as to the proposed high school. Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Shakopee, Minnesota 12 Worksheet . The proposed site traffic generation for the Countryside Residential Development and high school site . discussed above was distributed to the adjacent roadway system based on the site traffic distribution as indicated in Figure Cl. This traffic distribution is based on existing traffic patterns in the area and . preliminary traffic modeling prepared for the City's transportation plan update currently being prepared. The results of the traffic forecasting is shown on Figures C-4 and C-5 illustrating the AM and PM peak hour site generated traffic on the adjacent roadway system. . The 2010 and 2025 total traffic volumes were developed to include the proposed site-generated traffic from the adjacent development and high school site, as well as a background (non-site) traffic on the impacted roadways. This background traffic was developed based on the anticipated traffic growth from the preliminary Shakopee transportation plan update currently being prepared. Basedon that preliminary analysis, it is anticipated that there would be approximately a 3 % per year growth in traffic on CR 79, CR 77, and CSAH 15. The background traffic volume on the new extension of 17th Avenue was . developed based on the a.ssumption that the roadway would have an average daily traffic of 10,000 vehicles per day in 2010 and 15,000 vehicles per day in 2025. The proposed site-generated traffic was then removed from this number and the.remainder was considered the background traffic. Figures C-6 through C-ll in AppendixC show the 2010 and 2025 total projected traffic volumes on impacted roadways. 2010 and 2025 level of service analyses were conducted for the AM and PM peak hours on each of the impacted intersections. The following table illustrates the results of the level of service analysis. Level of Service Analvsis Results 2010 with 2020 with Intersection 2004 2010 MitiClation 2020 MitiQation AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM 17th Ave at: CR79 B B E F C1 C1 F F B2 B2 High School Entrance NA NA C C NA NA D C NA NA CR 77 NA NA C C NA NA C C NA NA Full DevAccess NA NA B B NA NA B B NA NA CSAH15 NA NA C D NA NA D F B2 B2 CSAH 15 at: M TH169 ramp B B B B NA NA C E A2 B2 S TH169 ramp C B D C NA NA F C C2 A2 1. Mitigation includes change from 2-way stop to 4-way stop. 2 Mitigation includes installation of a signal system when warranted/justified. The proposed baseline roadway geometries assumed inthe analyses include the following, and are illustrated in Figure C-3 found in Appendix C. 1. CR 79 - Widen to provide a right turn lane, through lane, and left turn lane in each direction at the intersection of17th Avenue. Widen to accommodate a right turn lane and left turn lane at the proposed high school site entrance south of 17th Avenue. 2. CR 77 - Widen to provide a right turn lane, through lane, and left turn lane in each direction at 17th Avenue.. Widen to provide a right turn lane at the residential development access north of 17th Avenue and a right turn lane in each direction at the development/high school access south of 17th Avenue. 3. CSAH 15 -.Widen to provide a bypass lane for southbound traffic and a right turn lane for northbound traffic at 17th Avenue. Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Shakopee, Minnesota 13 Worksheet . 4. 17th Avenue - New roadway with raised concrete median, with left turn lanes at all full movement . access points and right turn lanes at all access points. Full movement access will be provided at the main high school/residential development access between CR 79 and CR 77, and one full movement access betweenCR 77 and CSAH 15. In addition, right in/right out only access points will be provided between CR 79 and CR77 at two locations, and between CR 77 and CSAH 15at one location. The baseline intersection traffic control that was assumed for the analysis includes: 1. CR 79. at 17th Avenue - 2-way stop sign control stopping 17th Avenue. 2. 17th Avenue at High School/Development Access - 2-way stop sign control stopping the high school entrance/development access. 3. 17th Avenue at CR 77 - 2-way stop sign control stopping CR 77. 4. 17th Avenue at Site Development Access - 2-way stop control stopping site developmel)t access. 5. 17th A venue at CSAH 15 - One-way stop control stopping 17th Avenue. The results of the analysis indicate that all development right in/right out site accesses on 17th A venue and the development site accesses on CR 77 and CR 79 would operate at LOS B or better in 2010 and 2025 with the proposed lane geometries. The CR 79 at proposed 17th A venue is currently operating at an LOS B during the AM and PM peak hour. With the proposed development site traffic and the baseline intersection traffic control, the intersection would operate at level service E in the AM peak hour and F in the PM peak hour in 2010. With the installation of an all-way stop at that intersection, the level of service would improve to LOS C in the AM peak hour and PM peak hour for 2010. By the year 2025, the intersection would be operating at an LOS F in the AM and PM peak hours with the all-way stop condition. This intersection should be considered for signalization in the future, as development occurs in the area and traffic signal warrants are met and signal is justified. With signalization, the intersection would operate as a LOS B in the AM and PM peak hours. The full movement intersections at the high school/development entrance, CR 77 and the site development access on .17th A venue, would all operate at LOS C or better in 2010 and 2025, with proposed lane geometrics and intersection traffic controls. No additional intersection mitigation would be required in thefuttire. The Intersection ofCSAH 15 and. 17th Avenue would operate at an LOS C in the AM and D in the PM peak hour in 2010 with the proposed lane geometrics and intersection traffic control. By the year 2025, the PM peak hour would be at LOS F with these conditions. CSAH 15 is currently a 4-lane facility with turn lanes at the TH 169 ramps to TH 169. It is anticipated that as development continues to grow south ofTH 169, this roadway will be upgraded to provide, at a minimum, turn lanes at major intersections. In addition, this intersection would be a candidate for signalization in the future, should 17th A venue be extended to the west to CR 69. With potential signalization of this intersection and upgrading to provide a minimum left turn, through, and right turn lane in each direction, the intersection level of service in 2025 would improve toLOSB in the AM and PM peak hours. Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Shakopee, Minnesota 14 Worksheet ~ Regional impacts were also reviewed. The regional impacts for the proposed development are at the . CSAH 15 and TH 169 ramp intersections. As shown in the LOS analysis, the proposed development does not have an impact on the existing roadway system in 2010. However, by 2025, with the proposed site traffic and additional background traffic, signalization of these intersections may be justified. Approximately 20% of the proposed site traffic is anticipated to use these ramp intersections. Based on this data and analysis, the proposed site traffic now and in the futute will have a miriimal impact on the existing and proposed roadway system. With the anticipated extension of 17th A venue and the recommended roadway improvements, any impact should become negligible. Coordination is necessary between the developer, the City of Sha.kopee, and Scott County to ensure that the accesses are constructed as permitted. The proposed project will include the development of 449 single family housing units. A carbon monoxide analysis is not required for this project. It is anticipated that state and federal guidelines would not be exceeded. No stationary sources of air emissions will be constructed as part of the project. Noise Noise from construction activity is anticipated to temporarily increase. However, upon completion of construction of the site, only normal noise levels associated with a residential condition are anticipated. Dust During construction, particulate emission will temporarily increase due to generation of fugitive dust. The following dust control measures will be undertaken as necessary: 1. Minimize the period and extent of area being exposed or regraded at anyone time. 2. Spraying construction areas and haul roads with water, especially during periods of high wind or high levels of construction activity. Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Shakopee, Minnesota 15 Worksheet . 3. Minimize the use of vehicles on unpaved surfaces. . 4. Covering or spraying material piles and truck loads. Odors The construction and/or operation of this project is not anticipated to involve any processes or materials that would ge,nerate any odors. There are no known historical, archaeological, or architectural resources within this site according to the email received from the Minnesota State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO). The SHPO has recently determined that with regard to Environmental Assessment Worksheets (EA W), a negative known site/structure response from the SHPO databases is not necessarily appropriate information on which to base a "No" response to EA W Question 25a. It is the Responsible Governmental Unit's (RGU) obligation to verify the accuracy of the information contained within the EA W. A "No" response to Question 25a. without written justification should be carefully considered. The SHPO correspondence email is included in Appendix D. Based on information from the Scott County Soil Survey and information received from the Scott County Soil and Water Conservation District tlle following are Prime Farmland Soils: . Waukegan silt loam, 0-2 percent slopes (WaA) Well drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace. . Waukegan silt loam, 2-6 percent slopes (WaB) Well drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace. These soils are mapped on the Prime Agricultural Soils Map included in Appendix D. These areas will be converted from grassland to public park, open space, storm water ponds, and residential housing. Construction operations will be required to meet the City's ordinances related to duration of construction activities. Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Shakopee,Minnesota 16 Worksheet - . This project is subject to the following plans: . Scott County Comprehensive Plan The development of this site will be required to meet the policies of the County's Comprehensive Plan. This will be addressed during the plan review process. . City of Shakopee Comprehensive Plan (Updates 1999 and 2004) The development of this site is addressed in the plans. The requirements of the City's plan will be addressed as part of the plan review process. . City of Shakopee Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan The storm water management for the site will be required to meetthe policies ofthe City's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan. This will be addressed during the City's plan reVIew process. A review of the Scott County Comprehensive Plan, the City of Shako pee Comprehensive Plan Updates, and the City of Shakopee Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan was completed. The Countryside Residential Development plan will be required to meet the standards and policies in these plans; The City has concerns over utility easements necessary within the proposed project area. These issues will be addressed during the plan review process. The Comprehensive Plan (Updates 1999 and January 2004) for the City of Shakopee provides information on combined storm and sanitary sewer extension ratings as well as water service for the City. The storm and sanitary combined ratings for the project area are ranked high in ease of extension from existing locations. Storm sewer plans for the development will be required to be in conformance with City policies included in the Comprehensive Plan and Stormwater Comprehensive Plan. Water and sanitary sewer lines will be extended from existing developments east of the project area to serve the proposed development. Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Shakopee, Minnesota 17 Worksheet . . Construction of the new Shakopee High School is anticipated to occur in the area east of County Road 77 and south of the newly constructed 17th A venue. A separate EA W is being completed for the High School site. The fegionalland use conversion from open spa~e and agriculture to developed residential space is anticipated to have a cumulative impact on the area. Attempts to mitigate this impact will include providing open space in the developments, providing adequate storm water management facilities, and addressing traffic impacts. The City's current ordinances, standards, and policies are anticipated to be adequate to address these issues. No other environmental impacts are anticipated by this project. The recognized environmental impacts associated with the Countryside Residential Development project are as follows: 1. The land use will be converted from agric~ltural to residential: The development plans include park and open space to mitigate this impact. .2. Sanitary sewer flows and water consumption will increase: The Blue Lake Wastewater Treatment Facility has adequate capacity to handle the sewage volumes from this site. The increase in water will be mitigated by the expansion of the City's water supply, storage, and distribution systems. 3. Stormwater runoff volume will increase and runoff pollutant loads will increase: According to the Concept Plan approximately 5.1 acres of ponding/infiltration basins will he created to accommodate the increased stormwater runoff volume. . The impacts related to storm water quality and quantity will be mitigated by the use of the on-site storm water treatment ponds to reduce pollutant loads. 4. Based on the analysis, the proposed site traffic now and in the future will have a minimal impact on the existing and proposed roadway system. With the anticipated extension of 17th A venue and the recommended roadway improvements, any impact should become negligible. Coordination is necessary between the developer, the City of Shakopee, and Scott County to ensure that the accesses are constructed as permitted. Countryside Residential Development Environmental Assessment Shakopee,Mh1nesota 18 Worksheet . RGU CERTIFICATION. - I hereby certifY that: . The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. . TheEA W describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the projectas connected actions or phased actiqns, as defined at Minn. R. 4410.0200, subps. 9b and 60, respectively. . . Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. Name and Title of Signer: Date: The format of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet was prepared by the staff of the Environmental Quality Board at Minnesota Planning. For additional information, worksheets or for EAW Guidelines, contact: Environmental Quality Board, 658 Cedar St., St. Paul,MN 55155, 651-296-8253, or at their Web site http://www.mnplan.state.mn.us. Countryside Residential.Development Environmental Assessment Shakopee,11ilrnesota 19 Worksheet . APPENDIX . . APPENDIX A General Location Map, U.S.G.S. Quad Map, and Aerial Photo " / :; << '" o j . .' -,- )......, -f~l. . t;" 0 ~-,-~'1. -....sr.-Fr.4.lis. #' '" ~~ ., l4-:Be.lh~l" . . -. .' /V ~, : rt!,.""'!r ~ L ~ '" ~I't . ... · .. ~ ~ g '. . J .."'.......................1'.."'-.....-. .'.."......'..-........1....."'........ .. .. ...} .. OJ ,_. .....;..{ <;/G";;;.'I' " 1-.' . .. . i' ~ ~ ~.. . t.............l...........-...................:.....'...:......_...~... ........:.....:....'...........'....:....................Il.'.....;.................. /. ~.:......",j 4.....~. .Li~.~~Twp. ~ r.(, . _ 4.';:;1~;..~.".:.... 'E."'ls.!h.' ..,f ~. ~ r'~ Bu~.wp.,. ........../i!~..0a....~G...fO..~.:t:.;.2.#,. ".. ...-1./.... ". 'll . I."" '~...;.e/......g.._~';...;,.;.\?;.. ...., '2L ~ __.~~_... '~ ,_.' ",' ,-~f: "_<."._, ' " . .," u I;f 4 . .-'2:;::';J...;...:~~5fj-:-.- __.._...~~r., i .~ ~.......:....;....;I/... ....'" ::'-~.. c fiIlP -,:;,>/._:';,;-,l\-i;.{:"\-',,:',,.-','.:....o'-ot1'.:..: " ',: _^~. 0 "-'::'.i .y,."...{.<....";ltAnoKa Co.'~ . .-;; , . '\"VI... {. . ...., ""ilL -~ Ii;' . '" ~ ~ j "I {..~. .~ 1 ~l,ft;...~ ., '....": '- .,1 ,'j.. .. . ". .;;;2. ... ll" a ~rt J ~ ?;~ - .f! . I Aa"".y ,_ '.. i--41.td~ "".,. F ; .., bI ~ .~ f( ~~ "r-; Andover~~"'.. ~mlake ;; , ,- /-' IJ ~ ~~'. '! '!~.Jt "..~t~ ~l" .fI' "T:'" M. ~- l N.wSoandlaJ~ ~ '~(.\~:lJ.1 I . -, [' 9 . . -;--., It.' .1I...r- ~ ' ... 3i .. -. '.~j}. .ht'r":. .I I .. ) ~ ~ . "Lrm'" I . r-\.. Oa~on__...__'.'> I -'k I '.. . _..____+____.~I .. of' ~..Ili1~?a,a~\,~-' .~.,,{oh;;;:~.id:.l' "". '.- Washington Co. ~1 ".. tr':, ~ ' ' . ..- _B'a'n..L.._' ,. Hanover J, SIt ....11. III \ ,. '\ t~ . ~ In,eUikes'- Hugo ' ) - .,' I.' '. . ~..... ."-, ',1.. · ~ ) MavTwp. ~ .. . ~. r _"""~ '. I ....... I' _ '<j'.'i'" /' : ..~J'. , f---' .,..-, ..L'" ,,:f' . .'. '. . ". . ~~t:m. gj' ~ ,.....;, C<. ~.v7 n ~.C' (f ~. Co"",i'an :-A.e.J:SGrt\.:~-.. J~'smOJk'Ynpark '(Spr'mngLa""~~:s..;I-~. ~ l'ft. ...'1. ._.r-' { . " . , . ,'.\. Gr..n~i ,,~-=-_. ~r~1J"~ !iii--:'~ i"~- . ,.;- l~r Mo"~;.6t."- ~~~ tWh"e' .arT",,; -(', , " -','. ;',/1 -.IX~~. ':fII!if 10. -;: .~:_.~.~ ~ !~:':il ~ , ~~a~' :;,1I0.uwood Ii ~: ~ s""~'.rT:::," , .n. ~~..;.....:.... ~ \ -iI' 'I >--......1"1 ~~....:! \ nd'2.,- .......Sho'"'...... ." b! i \"--.L \ . ..; ... ... {_.,_ ",."1 ~ ..... ..-OISJ .."" ~~ Grant ;;;. "'....... "'.~'~8~'i '.......~:s,'... ,"Broo~lyn.,lCenler 1 Afi:lenHlUs'" . , .i.\.. ......,He~n.(lePI~cO... ,# ,II-.~ _\ -tlr~:-r l t~4N.iB~~h!On ~~~~ ~hil~,,:arLake . ~'1 '.J.'.tt.: '" . ; '~~"~ '1".1" ~ ~, :\ !.\.1 ..A71-....; ro- ,;-:,." - .------ --- --'--S"Uw..er' ~. ..., ,1~ma~:>' <(."".I-!,"": J..... \..~ CoI"",b1aH.OR"~I_V~l'~1 ~/ '",/,,3. ; : .' I A' 'n6S11'~:'.' <?:.....:-~~/i-~;,;;"'~t: '\-~. ~'~,;;~,:'~a.,.lj ~ ~'A~,h~~. '~Ir/i ~.LiW.C:J..d..~p,... ...,;;.sp"ng, _.U' ~~H.'9hts~~ .. I .j,~ ,~<<A~~ . .1 1 1l,. ..L..r.V n~ "iiiN'!~~:~,.",a.;~~~~T"l"." --. /1 '\ .. .~...:. '!f%'~",;'" ~ ..-' t - - ~i T/. __ _ Ao'.~II.. ~ : -~ '1.~Y\'Maf."w~d,Nli!fu'S' Paul )'.~ .. '",. ..,;....(\'" _ ' " ..,_".._ '._ I!!.II, . "" ;l.. . .-;' r Baytol'o11Twp . ....!.&..,"~. d'" '"",:, "'II c: l}tI,_ffi~, Ii'~ ,,Jml~&~;d?'~~tll.. rake'Elmo i \,', ~'L';~r ,;:>';-: . ~.:"""4"~'" _...' ','(~ . . Pl,h '-- ~. __ _~]cI~f~ Oakdal. ,.n a'ertown __. ' ,~.q'{ ;, ,Y,' __' Orono . Wayz.'a. ,m!. ," . " ~ ::: -<o:::J.~ -- -. --. .:.... .'. ,.1-\ \,~ t1B~'" 'f'~I~:"';{ , . ~,,,,,~'.~~~.~J~-t.t... '!.J/~lnn~,pOI" ~W, ~i r i. 5.f; ..... We"Lak.I.nd T';". "'\ ~ >L3.... e' . J ::("" ^ ~ (... .. ...t.. .,--== ,-___..J.. ~ ili;i:i' . ~SpnngPaH< .) s_~ '=' :Sl.l~UISP~k;S>-~j-" . __ _~ ' "' ~ -".- ..f~\ 1 ~ ~ q';' . ,~ I f" ~ -.: . ~~~ ~St P.aul . '. · '.4 ,.~ "'tiX0!(:s4!~~" oee;~';::~'M,nnatonka~' " __;L--Y )Jll ~~~ ....,Q ~,.....'I:, \ .".'v-~ , ,," \' ...;".t:,...... A~.:;;; - ,1'1. ,'- Hopk,n" ~ "",.~t - ~ -''''-; '-'::.il_ . ..,' ~ I,' >>'" . S'.'BornlaciJ: _ ,l..,' / .:';, __~ 'IF ., .....Ui ......--!--.: .'- -~ ;,.' 7 IOi', " _ .. . SIi~.WOOd..'......EX.....^"........,..c.....,...'...'......,...0....r.~.............~.........-.-'-t----"'I~,;s.1, I "~ "..' .rUm ~ f. . ......'........<.,...........'............ ......'... . ... .. / r i............................................'...~- , ~:~~.._i-..~ y,~...." ....;~ I ;.1 /. _8,- wolxlb ".J [..... . .. ~~.;;jt_.... ' . . roO . 1, y~ .W.,'.St. p", -- "ry. .,....,....Afton. ~ .~.$' . ....... .... 1&. . I -- . ,,>-(. . __r I 1 I.. B! ~J! . ....SUn~'h~k~ ! "N.wport "" ........;.;;-,-;. ~~O~T';'.~' .:t-~;'~~~ ~:-;~ .'~~~U~' I ~. i' '. "Irfj'~ \i\..~1 'I, ~ ;;; .,r::'J .:?.l . 15"~1~~\. ~'...I ''''j - -- . --" ._- [1f21~ ,-". - 1.,." ;,;,;:.: ...... ~~ ,...--...:..... ~~ '~L 1__~oo~lngtori" r/ .' \ 'I "-- ~l._ St Pauj'Park ~. .. ._ ! .J ""........ l~r''''i'7 .. ~.. ,,;t' 7}' I' ~",_' ....:.,... . ~ .. .Y _.. gan'" InverGroveHelghts!', ! . ",.. . ~ .....,.. .. .. ...... "Ir;,. . ..... ""',- --~. rtB;I ~.. ". i '\.:" Co.ag.Gi'D,. ...~........ ~k ....., ~ ~~, (_.r~.C~"d"'andTWP~~ 'T..". ... ... ..... .... . ~ ~ 'j:,; I:YR~!\ ~;.~ ~~;" "~~...l-:-'.. .. ....<. "",1<5 Soa'o"". ~ "'l'i-' ... "F~;\' \. . ~ P'7"'I'"Y.!;, , ) .r." '. ~ . , _ ',',. ..... :-e-.Jl.. "' BiJms~vdle . "-_!- !.:~" - ~,; \ _. .... .. ... ,.tf sa,eg. 1- -- ... .. . ) ,c>__:: . " If"" l. "J . S~. "':.. ............ ...............'....................... ...f:r~iak:_. ~.4J.. ~ ~ r~.,:h.~.j~.: Ao. :,eva"eyl ' A".",o~n'" Nlrnng.rTwp. ..". ",.. ............ ' ~".._ ""'L..':,.'H'" ... ....... .' ~'.'" 'f ~...... 1rtB--?"...'..' ..,..-..-,...----'.:' k0.:;..! HanoookTwp... " .. . I ~i...,:.:'......... '..'~ .:':lo ~~.. i ,'( .. '.~ :~~; //) , . ~. />:I]'.I.7'.~.,.....V~.. .,," ."..; . ...; - "I F'.."..... .... ".;"";.1-.....,7.-. .' ~:-.;i:'~r: . ................. ~..... . ...~..';;"4:(>... i--~--, ,'.. ~__:1 ..,.\..'.... . I l .............~...;.,;f.,..M,.,.:.;:..'!....i....:........'.'........... ;.;...Ba........nd....G......I.!V~...,..:................... .'.......................v?.....'.,;.~t.t,;.';........:........":~!'.... cr.e<l..' It A.."efTW:' l" 'i'"!t'~.- +....,.....................................'.......... .. . \ ~ A~ ,S:;~~i;~i~i"0!i"v..-qtJ....:!i~~':~t;~:~~~ \:_~.~'----1~,Jg~f..: / ... .. T MarnhanTwp ~. J.7' B6".P~lne ,- . . . 'tVI.1'~1 .. -- . i-..... ,'ii.".... ~~-\ _ ... .... ...~: - ~~s. >' ~.. .,...1 ~..' ~ ,. ~ .. ., f ~ \. T \.:.., ....,..,... ....... It'\' .."; .km., "wp. ". --r. Hel.nj Twp. ".1 c:dar Lak. Twp. .. . i. E".k, Twp. ;:0. ..l M.,."'" . 'k7,. c ~ ,. "r . l.t!. '. ..' -_........~. ..~----_.--'.-..f._..~1,.,-....... .. , '" .. ,....: }Do"",gt",TWP. .t'" ... 7"'.' ;>>'1. .\, " .-' ...:.., . ........ . L , .. zoo New Prag". "",. fI-l _ ! ~ I. ....:\.;..., " .J! ./ !-~. I--~_.~ ~'- .. .'" ..' ,'0, Solota Twp. -'~:j; ... "-1 i .("; ~ General Location Map N ~S...... Coutryside EA W 0 19,000 38,000 76,0~ W+. E A HAKOPEE City of Shakopee, MN eet ~ S &.A1>'<OCiut..~."u. ~ Aerial Map N Coutryside EA W 0 500 1,000 2,000 W+E ~B SHAKO PEE Cif of Shako ee, MN Feet s' ~ - - APPENDIX B Concept Design . )) ~' ) I \ ... - --' ~. . ",.. <' . ij . '......... -" _ ___ _ _ _ _ _' , "........ ./ ______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ___ - - - c.ngmeermg . nannmg . ..urveymg J -----./ ! '--------- . I == . , . . . ... _ _ I ~IG~Ar 1_6~ _ _ ___ -:: ~= ! r= r= _--- .- -.--,---- _ _ _ i CAS UHF; i! . -. .;j;;}i;-%t;..... ~ ..... _ _ "", ""'.;;:;? < ~!:;; -----' -- ~ -- -- - -' -- , _ _ 1 .A "......,....~. _\ _-1-+ .1"1-1 I """.~,_,_ . .._,=~,;I --AT-"\- r-- .~--- :.:7::~,'.?:;;::,;; --I ....---- -\" , I ',II I ::.;sr- ~.- 1 . ~ II {fT' .\~~~8~28~L30313~33~35/.y_ ..... ~:~r~~- .\3413313213113012912827128125124/ 150502JrdA_NorlII.",)I7HItlIh,_ta.55W 15 3 4 ,'''23.-1, 1-- r- f":' -1,36 ..'.. ~:~- 35 ).-t--j--t-j-,-t----j--r-,-" 23./ phone 76J/476-60IO _' ~ 76J/476-85J2 14 - ... , I 221 . .' '--- .,...,'~ ,........ Co Mal; mln1OnfnJ.ccm ". 16 5 I--:::L ~- - - -r:;;::;==~ \37 p.....,/., ~~~ 36 1 <<tTi= -=0- - -F2W ' 2 1 \ I ~. r 1I1-_~ IIry--r= . -. i!i@"",:--:=-" = ~'\I 22 . 13( /" I~ ii..>, \ \~ I' ~fli1F3t-45 611 l' 141 IE ::/.^~"::j-~:Jil,i~~~ 371 I 11 r;=r "!-1"2--; -4 ~ Chent - 121 '~/17 1 ~ +-:- I ~ lIt' I 12 13: ,~ . ,'~'. " ,'{/Jii~iii~ 38T I i 21sT, . I m r-i2O ~ /: ~ 7 19 12 11 10 9 8 7 , ! ~ n ' , " "~::. .!~ .~6J ]\\w..-;:-- 11t 1'1182021 ;.;;-::: ;;..-::~~~ I ,~,L.~~_ ---_ !3 121 1140 'f~~~~~~391 I 1314' [98765 \ \19 71 ,'i 119 ... "\--~~-~~~- -:'\ ~ ' ~, ~- - - - -~ 14 11 I I' ~ ~'.'.' -~:~'.M'itiliiii!-~ 40: I 14 13, ,'-- - - -~' ,18 Tollefson.Development CO. .~ ~ ~--, 5 \ , 9 I 17 ~ ',.,. .., , 1 T r--:::;:- - ....:-- --;t '.::::=:::::::~;;..-::~ ::ml i---~ 2 3 4 ......- 'I \ ; g -;;+ Ilti 2 -3 ;- --- - I i 5 10 T J 'l " / " p",r'i/\'i~~~",:>:,,'; 5 12 'e - I+=::- ~ 1177 Lakeville, MN 91 ti~ - ,1 h l-1--, I 16, ~ 56 I '-'"" . ",... -'---_ ..... ----!- - 5 7 10 J ,,' . '.,,' '~'" ' - h. ,'" 1 6 11 I c-- '118 .... - 8 6 9 .< -, . ..' . ',", 1 2 3 4 5 ~ ~I' -234 1--f;i'0 9 _ --lr:;~_- 1 ~1'll~11..!.0.!8 7/'1 I, -,.,"" '/", n:~SI:7 101 I 1i15 7 1 1 8 ,12 -I--j::. ~~II ,'4( :11-. -- -~-, i 7 8 II' .' , '.' ' >" I 8 , I 10 9 8 7 8 ~ ~ TYPICAL LOT SIZE: ...:J.. , 8 7 __ I --.t~~ ' T 11 j3i- [- - - _ r _ _ L ,.. , ~ . n , y, , 9 I L._ '""_ __ _ _ ,? . ~ 94 LOTS o 72'-60'x125' ~ I ~~ 9_ -~~~.,.a:'1~-~5"~ 6 \ +';-1 '-iit -I--!--- _ '!-_ 1-_ -;.._~ - ft_ - - _::T_ - -'1-- _ _ _~ 1'3 ProJect , 5! 1.:::::?=.~_;;"-::~\II~--1 2 3 4 L.-,J-- ',-!-- ,~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 11' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ~o,' 1 ~- 1-- - -1-- - /, - - --::=t'-::-JL1 112 o c--+- I~ _ - 5 I 1 ~ . \ 7 1'3 1 I, 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 ' 1 2 3 4 5/8111 Ti'1 . . U 4 I , - - 3 4 \\~ 9 ~_ _- '... I t-;ot :1,2 11 10 9 8 7 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 1312 I 1 I --r-;;:;- A TraditIOnal . ~ I r, ' · ";~'I ~ m.'::.j- - - -1-- ! !--- -f-- _ _ _ _~~ 1'~ 17 ~ 1514 1312 11 10 '1'2 11 10 9 81~1Ii ~ Single Family Plan .. ,--7-i- ,h 8 7 ~ \it-~~;;..-::~~ -" il~ - - -~_ _ _ _ _ _ J C -- -1--- ----- -,""--I---~ ~ .. 'III ~11l~~;v.~,~." ~'~'1' 1'll!~iwHEe!j}~;-, ~~'1~ ~ "........ '\11 ;;..-::~;:::::::: ;;:::::o-~_~ ~:\~\ ~\\~ ~~ - - -- - - - _ _ ~I.~ 17UL AYENllI 1'- - ! ~ SheelTltle i"'~__ ~~~ (- 7 6 ~ ~~ - - - _L-_ _ _ _ I \~~ I 8 ~............-r- ~ - - _ '_ M IJIIIII!:: -:--~-- ~1"(~~ 4\ 5 - - Concept Plan i\~ \JETLAND ~~~- ~~ 1 2_\-_ ....\-- 6 TYPICAL LOT SIZE: I TYPICAL LOT SIZE: 60' Lots East Site \\\\\ .---:: -"<>~ 44 J,-~ 46 \\\, - - t. ~ ~ 121 LOTS 0 60'-70'xl00'-125' I 114 LOTS 060'-70'xll0'-125' :J\~..:-",::::::--~" . "'..\.2" - )J\~~-::::::,;<,~.) (7 \ ___....L~ AVB._________ ---\-...- -'" '" . . 43 ( ..::::~ \ ~\ 1 <::~I 8 _,' III!"":""" '\ ~~ 12 ~. . . ~.on i . 14 , \ \ \ .. ' . '-.. ~\\~~ \ 1 101'~ - '~""":.. 42' ~ ~', I 2 \ ~ n--::-I 9 I hereby ~ that this plan was prepared by \ .o;39~ ! h- 13 J " m. IX" under my direct .~..-.lslan GIld that ' 2 . . . . . . 41 I I:" ..,-- I ern a 001 Ucensod PiOi~al En In.... ~ 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 21 \~~ ~9 \ l ~31'X. .~tl)ljli.' . Gat ,; ~~ I ~ . under tho raws of tho Stat. af MlnnJl..ta. 12 _^'--=I'- - - - - - - __..\~'\ \ 3 8 '\ I 14 . . . . . . -r- I. ; 4 ~', \ ! 11 51 at Ir;....;: ......37!,1 111 I-+-- ,CIIlU" ; - - - - - - -: I . . . ../ -1--,' (I j' 5 ~ I! 12 Nam. \ ' I 4 7 I 15 _ . J6 10 I 'r>-- 11 .~ ~ - - - - - - - \ 1 I . . i \ \ \ 6 I--=--i- I I 13 Dot. l1cense , ~~- 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 , ! 5 6 !"ll~\6 17 . . ~I ~\\', 7 ~ ''t7- ~~- - -~--~, ~~~~'\.,' ..... 8 I I ~ -, 18 ""-... - Desiqnod MJG Olockod ' ,--l I TYPICAL LOT SI?E:, ,~' ~ \ I 19 34 .~"'-.;;::- -~ I 15 Drawn JlG Awroved 120 LOTS 0 70 -60x125 '20 21 I.' .,/ 33 r-~ __ _-" _ h--- \ 2 ~....._ _ 22 I ..' .><.. . /32. 31 30 29 i I i 16 Oat. 7/20/04 3' '~- j<.f\~f123T;;T-J;'r--l , ~ 4' - - ~~::::-e,..~~:"+:5j ~ /2.7!; II! 18 Revisions 5 6 7 - ~"'----.:.~i::::t- I ~ 8 9 10 - ~~~Z( J 19 No. Dat. By Remarks 1112 - - ~ 13 14 - 15 16 - - 17 18 t; - SITE SUMMARY i I AREAS ACRES PERCENT UNIT TYPE I LOT/UNIT COUNT CITY DESIGN STANDARDS . ~~~t~8ffi::~s 10.5. AC. 6.4% TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY LOTS i 449 HOME SllES A. MAXIMUM DISlRlCT DENSITY: 5 - Dv.auNGS PER ACRE. I +22 HOME SllES B. PROPOSED DENSITY 449 + 164.7 AC. - 2.7 U/AC. FROM PREVIOUS C. MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE PERCENTAGE: 50%. SllE PLAN D. LOT SPECIFlCA TIONS: . PUBUC. MAXIMUM LOT WIDTH (SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED): 60 FEET. . PARKS 13.3 AC. 6.1% (EXISTING TWO FAMII,.Y DWEWNGS): 70 FEET. MINIMUM LOT DEPTH: 100 FEET. . - -------------- PROPOSED PIPE UNE MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK: 30 FEET. MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK: 10 FEET. r-':::j MINIMUM SID. E YARD SETBACK (CO.RNER): 20 FEET. WEllANDS 2.7AC. 1.6% MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK: 30 FEET. MINIMUM LOT AREA = 6,000 SQ. FT. Sheet Revision . ii!i ~'!'i "Am< a' AC. .,. . . ~ ~. o. ~ TOTALS 31.6 AC. 19.2% .. NORTH L{-.!.J i SllE TOTALS :!:164.7 AC. 100% ~ I If . MFRA FILE NO.: 14870 ~. 0 100 200 400 600 . . APPENDIX C Traffic Analysis " LO .... I <( en ()) (,) r-- 0 0::: r-- '- r-- 0 t~ 0 (,) or 0::: tl' 0 () -- ---- ----- ------_.~---- t~ ?ft. o. ?ft. ~ It) 0 It) ~ N ~'- '- ~ ~ .alt~ +- .alt'- +- 300/0 or or or ~ t I' J. 1\tl' J. 1\tt" 17TH AVE --.. --.. 0 "" "" 0 ~~ ?ft. ?ft. :c <( It) It) en () ~ ... 4150 Olson Memorial Highway COUNTRYSIDE EAW N Suite 300 WSB Minneapolis, MN 55422 xl,,; City of Shakopee Figure C-1 A 763-5414800 Trip Distribution &: A.tsociaLe.~. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 Scott County, Minnesota 11~lliI::f'J,."11 :(.t"III:~_.:I~[ttli'il=r.:+"""':I.~'N~I=:""'"t ;'\01281-69\ fig-01.dgn " LO T"" J: <C (/) 0> () r--. r--. 0 ..... ll'l NN c::: , N r--. 0 ON r--. () (') N 216 ~~ 0 84 c::: 0 () ~_._- _ _ ....0.....- ---'-- _ --.---.--- -oco - 010 ..... ..... Ol N<O ll'l N !~ t" ....."" COr-- ..... r-- ll'l..... 0 0 0 0 "<;f' T- T- T- CO 00' T- N ""'" Ol <ON ..... CO ll'l CO T'""."'- (') r-- ll'l0 NN "" 119 131 N ,,"0 o<or-- ~~ ONO +- 0 ""0 J!~ +- 0 J~~ r 15 44 3200 ro ro 0.Jl ,t" 17TH AVE t" 0.Jl ,t" 0--+ 0--+ O~ Oll'l.... ll'l0 O~ 0<00 ll'lN ll'l <0 .... ..... <0 CO <0 CO N ON <0 0 .... 00 LO (j) T"" C") J: <C (/) () 'AM - XX PM - XX ADT - XX COUNTRYSIDE EAW N A. 4150 Olson Mamonal Highway Figure C-2 A Suite 300 WSB Minneapolis, MN 55422 City of Shako pee Existing 2004 763.54141lOO & Associates. Inc. T FAX 763-541.1700 Scott County, Minnesota .1\'IliI:m....... :{.["I.I:f:.....;a~[C!h~I=-:m........:,I.~l~I\'Ili:I:.+.,' t'\01281-69\ fig-02,dgn . . Preliminary Concept Plan 17th Avenue Extension City of Shakopee, M in nesota SHAKOPEE -,- FAA=-<l4t_'1lIQ I +-0 -r 154 0-+ '" t' CSAH15 77~ co to LO...... ...... ...... N ~. 12 '<;J"NtO All~ +- 0 -r 35 21..)l",tt' COUNTRYSIDE 0.-+ 00 00 LO . COUNTRYSIDE DEVELOPMENT 12 ~ ...... ~ DEVELOPMENT co co I"!N AI~ ~4 30 ~ tt' oco co ...... '<;J" ~1 m ~4 C')0C') ......N...... AI ! ~ +- 10 AI~~ +-2 NN ~1 -rO -r 34 AI ~ +- 38 1..)l ",tt' 8..)l t CO. RD. 77 1..)l 10-+ '" t' 27-+ 5-+ LOOLO ~ l'-'<;J"co 34~ ...... ...... 5 LO...... ...... C') o LO 00 N AI~ ~ 14 15 ~ tt' C') LO co ...... 006 ...... C') 0 ~ 30 ~~N HIGH SCHOOL AI~ ~ +- 0 COUNTRYSIDE -r 91 SITE 92..)l '" t t' DEVELOPMENT 0-+ OCOLO 51 ~ ~ '<;J"...... N o C') '<;J"N AI~ ~ 16 30 ~ tt' LOa LO ...... N 00 ......'<;J"C') ~ 81 '<;J"......l'- co...... AI~~ +-34 '<;J"'<;J" ~ 95 CO. RD. 79 AI ~ +- 81 -rO 102 ..)l 14..)l '" t t' 14-+ . 14 -. ...... 0 0 27~. co ~ A 4150 Olson Memortal Highway COUNTRYSIDE EAW Suite 300 FigureC-4 WSB Minneapolis, MN 55422 ~Z 763.541-4800 City of Shako pee .AM Site Traffic & AssociaJe.... lnc. FAA 763-541-1700 Scott County, Minnesota .1~ll:I:J..}..'"tI:{I["I'I:I"":iI\l[tilill:ll:l~"""""':.I."ill~I::::I:~'"I 1'\01281-59\ fig.04.dgn +-0 -r 101 CSAH 15 O~ .... I' 50""- N LO CON ..- I'-- ~ <Xl' ~7 ..- ..- ..- AI!\.. +-0 . -r 21 14~ .... 1 I' o <O<OLO COUNTRYSIDE 9""- '<t<O..- COUNTRYSIDE ..- DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT ~ LO..- AI! ~3 19 ""- 11' '<t'<t NN N LO ~4 LO ~o NON LO..-O AI!\t.+-6 AI!\.. +-6 NN -r 10 -r 18 4J1 1 15 JI .... 1 I' co. RD. 77 10~ .... l' I'? 0 I'? 20 ~ (j) I'? ..- 11""- N N 1""- ~..- (j) LO'<t N..- AI! ~9 29 ""- tl' '<tLO '<t..- N 0<Xl0 ~ 17 I'? <Xl <0 AI!\.. +-0 -r 52 HIGH SCHOOL 137 JI .... 1 I' COUNTRYSIDE SITE DEVELOPMENT o~ <x)LOLO 72 ""- <0 ~ '<t N 00 ,......('\f AI! ~8 43 ""- 11' 00 ..- I'? N <0 LO'<t'<t ~65 N..-I'-- OlN Al ! \.. +- 10 <0<0 ~ 29 AI \.. +- 25 -rO CO. RD. 79 32J1 43 JI", 1 I' 43~ 21 ~ (j) N 0 41""- ..- ~ ... 4150 Olson Memorial Highway COUNTRYSIDE EAW Suite 300 Figure C-5 WSB Minneapolis, MN 55422 ~Z 763-541-4800 City of Shakopee PM Site T raffle &: A,IIi!iociate.v. Inc. FAX 76J..541.11oo Scott County, Minnesota .1~1~:l'~"t I :~'I'''''I:~=--''' :iI~rctl~l::I :I:..........:,! 1J..~i'I\lI:l :~.. t, \01281-69\ f'g- 05.dgn . ..- 63 - or 220 CSAH15 .184-+ 1\ I' 106~ 0> C'> o'<t .....N co '<tMCO '-.12 ~ I.~ +- 2 ~ or 35 21..Jl 1\ 11' 2 -+ co 0> LO 12 ~ ..... M COUNTRYSIDE ..... COUNTRYSIDE OEVELOPMENT N~ DEVELOPMENT 1Ii '-.4 30 ~ 11' coco C'>. C'> co .' C'>NC'> '-.1 ''<t~0> '-.7 ..I I ~ ..- 47 ..I I ~ ..- 28 N N '-. 1 ~ orz ~. or 44 .J ~"-77 1 ..Jl 1\ t I' 12..Jl 1\ 11' co. RD. 77 1..Jl 99 -+ 88 -+ . ,^ 133-:+- LO C'> LO LO' ~, co M~ ..... ..... V~ .....~C'> 0> OLO 00 C'> ..Ii '14 15 ~ 11' NLO co en oom ~ g3 ~ ~30 ..I I ~ "-2 ~ or 91 92 ..Jl 1 HIGH SCHOOL 2 -+ '1\ . I' COUNTRYSIDE o LO LO ' SITE 51 ~ ..... '<t ..... DEVELOPMENT NN co o en '<tC'> .Jt '-. 16 30 ~ t I' '<to LO..... '<t 0> M 00 '-. 133 '<tNOO ~ ~ '-. 95 ..I I ~ ..- 108 11 ~ ..- 181 ~ or 86 CO. RD. 79 102 ..Jl 49..Jl '1\ 11' ~. 258 -+ 198 -+ 0> N N ,-- Z 52 ~ I'- ~ ~ ... 415oo'sonMemOrials~fl.,hw~~ COUNTRYSIDE EAW Figure C-6 WSB Minneap~is~:~54::::.iiJ'h'i City of Shakopee 2010 TOTAL TRAFFIC &A....ociale..,'nc. FAX76J.541-1700 SHAK'.o"""'.E. .'E" Scott County Minnesota AM PEAK .1~liI:l'J"."'IIN..[MlIl:n:".:II\\(C'lI~m:l:ll::h"":I.':1~I~J:::I:J,.'"t P I t.\01281-69\ fig-06.dgn . +- 231 ~ r 250 CSAH15 81--' 1'\ r 100~ co C') C')CO ......N LO r--......co ~7 ......C')...... J! !~ +-2 , r 21 14..Jl 1'\ t r 2 --. co co LO 9~ '<I"r--...... ('t') COUNTRYSIDE 0 COUNTRYSIDE '<I" DEVELOPMENT LO C') DEVELOPMENT J!! ~3 19 ~ lr co '<I" ('t')N '<I" '<I" ~4 ............'<1" ~5 NNN NC')N J! ! ~ +- 128 J! ! ~ +- 98 NN ~3 r 10 r 33 J! ~ +- 134 4..Jl t 25 ..Jl 1'\ t r CO. RD. 77 2..Jl 53 --.:'\ r j 88 --. 51--' ('t') OLO 11 ~ ~ N ~ 3~ N~""" LO LON N M J!! ~9 29 ~ tr OlLO LO...... '<I" '<I" ocoo ~17 C')NCO J!! ~ +- 2 r52 137..Jl 1'\ t r HIGH SCHOOL 2--' COOLO COUNTRYSIDE SITE 72 ~ co~ '<I" ' DEVELOPMENT co o r-- ...... ('t') J!! '~8 43 ~ tr LOa NM '<I" C')CO 0'<1"...... ~ 119 CON...... OlN J! ! ~+- 231 coco ~ 29 J! ~ +- 334 r 181 CO. RD. 79 32 ..Jl 86 ..Jl t ~Z 107 --. 1'\ r 203 --. NaCO 72 ~ r-- ~ ~ A 4150 Olson Memorial HighWay COUNTRYSIDE.EAW Figure C,.7 Suite 300 WSB Minneapolis, MN 55422 763.541--4800 City of Shakopee 2010 TOTAL TRAFFIC &: Associa1e.~. fllc. FAX 763-541.1700 Scott County, Minnesota PM PEAK .lilliil:l.lo,.....I:~.r"lIm=-.:w..n~I:I:I:..~~:IIr..'ill\1I=:~'1I t'\01281. 59\ 1;9-0 7,d9n . co C<>O c<> c<>. c<> COCO LON !~ '- 74 306 ~ 34 130 tl' c<> I'- .~ N O~ I'- ..- N --.--.-- --- -- co 0) co N ~..- 1'-0 I'- N NC<> l~ tl' C<>~ NO NN CO LOCO NCO I/) .... :c <l:: CJ) () AM -XX PM -XX A. 4150 Olson Memorial Highway COUNTRYSIDE EAW Figure -8 N Suite 300 WSB Minneapolis, MN 55422 A 763-5414800 City of Shako pee 2010 T tal Traffic &: AS!fnciaJe.f, Inc. FAX 763-541.1700 S1iAK.OPEE Scott County, Minnesota TH 16 at CSAH 15 .I.:'II:"'~""II :..(ttl":I=-"W:ll~fetl~l:l:m..~"::iI':':1~I~lllI :....'"1 t'\01281-69\ Eg.OB.dgn . +-98 ~ r 256 CSAH15 285-+ "\ I' 122 "" '<t I"- ('t)..... .....('t) .co co " 12 '<t('t)co AI! \.. +- 2 r 35 21 ~ "\ t I' 2 COCOLO 12"" ..... ~ COUNTRYSIDE COUNTRYSIDE DEVELOPMENT ('t) DE;VELOPMENT ..... N'<t AI! "4 30 ~ tl' coco ('t) '<t '<t "1 N('t) "9 ('t)N('t) co'<t..... 11 ! \.. +- 67 AI ! \.. +- 42 NN "1 r2 r 50 " \.. +- 98 1 ..JI t 14 ..JI t CO. RD. 77 1..J1 151 -+ "\ I' 131-+ "\ I' 191-+ LONLO 24 "" ~ ~ ~ 34 "" ..... ..... '<t co 0..... CO'<t .J! "14 15 ~ tl' NLO I"- '<t co '<t .....mo " 30 ~N""'" " ! \.. +-.2 .. r 91 HIGH SCHOOL 92 ..JI "\ t I' COUNTRYSIDE SITE 2 -+ 0 LO LO DEVELOPMENT 51 ~ ~:Q"'" co om '<t('t) "! " 16 30 ~ tl' '<to co..... LO .....0 ('t)1"-0 " 162 LON..... CO.<r- " ! \.. ~ 149 '<t'<t " 95 AI \.. ~ 256 r 133 CO. RD. 79 1 02 ..JI 68 ..JI t ~Z 299 -+ "\ I' 392 -+ . m'<to 66 ~ co ~ g: .... 4150 Olson Memorial Highway COUNTRYSIDE EAW Figure C-9 Suite 300 WSB Minneapolis, MN 55422 .<F:: City of Shakopee 2025 TOTAL TRAFFIC i-, "~;';;:'."" 763.541-4800 &: As,fociaJes. Inc. FAA 763-541-1700 SHAKOPEE Scott County, Minnesota AM PEAK .1i'I:I:l'l..~I:tI[""I:~~"i'[etlilt..:::t:"""'.:I."~I~I;:f:{"""I t'\01281-69\ fig-09.dgn ~ +- 358 - r 332 CSAH15 126--+ ~ I' 128"'" I"- Ol 1"-('<) ..... ('<) '<I' ~~~ ~7 .JJ\a+-2 ... r 21 14 ~ ~t I' 2 <01010 9 ~ '<1'. ~ ..... COUNTRYSIDE COUNTRYSIDE DEVELOPMENT 10 ~ DEVELOPMENT .J~ ~3 19 "'" 11' M '<I' 10N 10 N NNN ~4 g~~ ~8 .J I \.. +-195 .J J \.. +-.149 N N ~. 3 .. r 10 .. r 41 .J\.. +- 194 4 .JC ~ t I' 31 .JC ~ t I' CO. RD. 77 2 .JC 77 --+ . 68 --+..... co ~ 121--+ M NM ,_ 11"'" N N 4"'" Mlri..... N 10N N'<I' .J~ ~9 29 "'" t I' 1"-10 I"- ..... 10 o co 0 ~ 17 MM<O .JJ\..+-2 .. r 52 HIGH SCHOOL 13~ ~ ~ t I' COUNTRYSIDE SITE 72 "'" ~ ~ ~ DEVELOPMENT '<I' 10 01"- .....'<1' .J~ ~8 43 "'" t I' MO '<I'M 10 <ON ~ ~ ~ ~ 149 ~ ~ ~ 29 .J. J \t.. +- 352 .J \.. +- 504 .. r 280 CO. RD. 79 32.JC 100.JC ~t I' ~. 291 --+ 155 --+ ..... 10 N ""...- Z 89"'" ~M~ .. 41500IsonMemorials~i~:;~~ COUNTRYSIDE EAW Figure C-1 0 IAft:'D Minneapoiis, MN 55422 YY~D 763-541-4800 ;I"4%i';;;;'",'l')( City of Shakopee 2025 TOTAL TRAFFIC &d.".ociale.',lnc. FAX 763-541-1700 s'. . C.: ,.k Scott County Minnesota PM PEAK .1~1;:l'J,..""I:-lIIIIIII:~=-"".~lethlt:l:l:~""":lIJ.'hlh'I;:::I:~"'1 liAKOPEE , .' .. . ... . ['\01281-69\ f;9-10.dgn . . W om wC'? ...... N'<I" ..... C'? !\a ~ 96 335 ~ 43 234 tl' o~ '<1"...... C'? lOW w...... C'? ------ -.-- -- NCO .....w w...... ..... ..... '<1"...... C'?'<I" !\a tl' to..... ......co C'?N co..... '<1"...... C'?...... 10 ..... J: < (J) u AM - XX PM - XX ... 4150 Olson Memorial Highway COUNTRYSIDE EAW Figure C-11 N Suite 300 WSB Minneapolis, MN 55422 A ."Co.;'':: City of Shakopee 2025 Total Traffic 763-541-4800 - ;F_';.""."~ &: As...ociale.... Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 SHAKOPEE Scott County, Minnesota TH 169 at CSAH 15 1l~~liI:l''''"1':'''lHI'':I=-''':::Ik'l,"l~l:l::l:+-'''''':l.~l~'~':::I:f,.''' t'\01281-69\ fig-l1.dgn WSB & Associates, Inc. , . 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 County Road 79 & 17th Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name: 79th& 17thave-8-26-04am 6:00-9:00 AM Turning Movement (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000003 Shakopee, MN Start Date : 08/26/2004 August 2004 Page ,No : 1 Start Time . Total Int. Total Factor 06:00 AM 17 8 0 31 06:15AM 15 25 0 50 06:30 AM 24 25 0 77 06:45 AM 32 29 0 79 Total 88 87 0 237 07:00 AM 0 9 13 22 25 0 3 28 2 23 0 25 0 0 0 0 75 07:15AM 0 14 21 35 26 0 2 28 8 37 0 45 0 0 0 0 108 07:30 AM 0 22 19 41 35 0 5 40 7 33 0 40 0 0 0 0 121 07:45 AM 0 17 19 36 33 0 5 38 4 62 0 66 0 0 0 0 140 Total 0 62 72 134 119 0 15 134 21 155 0 176 0 0 0 0 444 08:00 AM 0 12 20 32 20 0 6 26 7 28 0 35 0 0 0 0 93 08:15 AM 0 17 13 30 9 0 7 16 10 20 0 30 0 0 0 0 76 08:30 AM 0 8 27 35 19 0 3 22 4 15 0 19 0 0 0 0 76 08:45 AM 0 15 20 35 14 0 10 24 3 31 0 34 0 0 0 0 93 Total 0 52 80 132 62 0, 26 88 24 94 0 118 0 0 0 0 338 Grand Total 0 161 193 354 , 238 o. 46 284/ 67 314 0 3811 0 0 0 0.: I 1019 Apprch % 0.0 45.5 54.5 83.8 0.0 16.2 27.9 17.6 82.4 0.0 37.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 15.8 18.9 34.7 23.4 0.0 4.5 6.6 30.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '. ,,;r WSB & Associates, Inc. . , 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 79th& 17thave-8-26-04am (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000003 Start Date: 08/26/2004 Page No :2 ~U T ~o (:. o ~.J" U ",s. North -'N 0 ..... . ::Ttol " -'" QJ 0 Ec: O2 f-:;! I\)-:f m- ~-----t /26/2004 6:00:00 AM z 20 ",::l)> 0 /26/2004 8:45:00 AM .j>. < Z8U o- m .<: Unshifted ,.... ~~ n .r-~ ~ .j>.- '. , WSB & Associates, Inc. . , 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 79th&17thave-8-26-04am (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000003 Start Date : 08/26/2004 Page No :3 65 79 114 0 18 132 26 160 0 186 0 0 0 0 462 45.1- 54.9 86.4 0.0 13.6 14.0 86.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17 19 33 0 5 38 4 62 0 66 0 0 0 0 140 0.825 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM 5:45:00 AM 0 22 19 41 35 0 5 40 4 62 0 66 0.878 0.825 0.705 WSB & Associates, Inc. . < 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 County Road 79 & 17th Avenue Minneapolis,'MN 55422 File Name : 79th& 17thave-8-27 -04pm 3:00-6:00 PM Turning Movement (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000003 Shakopee, MN Start Date : 08/26/2004 August 2004, Page No : 1 Start Time . Total Int. Total Factor 03:00 PM 48 38 18 0 104 03:15 PM 60 31 26 0 117 03:30 PM 63 27 14 0 104 03:45 PM 71 28 17 0 116 Total 242 124 75 0 441 04:00 PM 0 34 33 67 25 0 4 29 4 18 0 22 0 0 0 0 118 04:15 PM 0 36 32 68 30 0 12 42 3 27 0 30 0 0 0 0 140 04:30 PM 0 50 30 80 33 0 7 40 4 22 0 26 0 0 0 0 146 04:45 PM 0 43 38 81 25 0 14 39 9 30 0 39 0 0 0 0 159 Total, 0 163 133 296 113 0 37 150 20 97 0 117 0 0 0 0 563 05:00 PM 0 42 36 78 32 0 9 41 6 28 0 34 0 0 0 0 153 05:15 PM 0 52. 36 88 33 0 9 42 2 25 0 27 0 . 0 0 0 157 05:30 PM 0 40 36 76 30 0 .9 39 8 27 0 35 0 0 0 0 150 05:45 PM 0 52 44 96 36 0 17 53 10 28 0 38 0 0 0 0 187 Total 0 186 152 338 131 0 44 175 26 108 0 134 0 0 0 0 647 Grand Total 0 494 382 876l 332 0 117 ' 4491 52 274 0 3261 0 0 0 0.:1 1651 Apprch % 0.0 56.4 43.6 73.9 0.0 26.1 16.0 84.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 29.9 23.1 53.1 20.1 0,0 7.1 27.2 3.1 16.6 0.0 19.7 0,0 0.0 0.0 WSB & Associates, Inc. , . 4150 Olson Memorial HwySuite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 79th& 17thave-8-27 -04pm (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000003 Start Date : 08/26/2004 Page No :2 o. R .79 Out In Total C]QID 876 I 14821 0 494 382 'ht Tt Left 4 J[J o~J T U'" ~o .... North ::T'" ,~ S. "D -/>> Ql 0 Ec: O2 (--:;I ..., <lI_ F:--) /26/2004 3:00:00 PM .J:lt.--S Z 20 ....'" 0 /26/2004 5:45:00 PM <D < ZaU o- lD .s: Unshifted r- n r'" ~ ~d ;::l!~ ..., ",10 "'- r Ri ht 52 WSB & Associates, Inc. . 4150 Olson MemorialHwy Suite 300 File Name .: 79th&17thave-8-27-04pm Minneapolis, MN 55422 (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000003 Start Date : 08/26/2004 Page No :3 . Total Int. Total 186 152 338 131 0 44 175 26 108 0 134 0 0 0 0 647 55.0 45.0 74.9 0.0 25.1 19.4 80.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 52 44 96 36 0 17 53 10 28 0 38 0 0 0 0 187 0.865 05:45 PM 05:45 PM 05:45 PM 2:45:00 PM 0 52 44 96 36 0 17 53 10 28 0 38 0.880 0.825 0.882 ! WSB & Associates, Inc. . 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 169 NB Ramps & CSAH 15 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 169ramp-nb&csah 15..8-25-04pm 3:00:6:00 PM Turning Movement (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000002 Shakopee, MN Start.Date : 08/25/2004 August 2004 Page No : 1 Start Time . Total Int. Total . Factor 03:00 PM 55 5 19 0 79 03:15 PM 40 5 16 0 61 03:30 PM 59 11 18 (j 88 03:45 PM 47 6 21 0 74 Total 201 27 74 0 302 04:00 PM 0 30 29 59 4 0 1 5 4 15 0 19 0 0 0 0 83 04:15 PM 0 48 27 75 2 0 2 4 4 13 9 17 0 0 0 0 96 04:30 PM 0 59 29 88 8 0 1 9 3 9 0 12 0 0 0 0 109 04:45 PM 0 53 23 76 8 0 0 8 6 14 0 20 0 0 0 0 104 Total 0 190 108 298 22 0 4 26 17 51 0 68 0 0 0 0 392 05:00 PM 0 43 32 75 9 0 0 9 4 22 0 26 0 0 0 0 110 05:15 PM 0 41 28 69 1 0 2 3 9 15 0 24 0 0 0 0 96 05:30 PM 0 33 26 59 11 0 1 12 9 20 0 29 0 0 0 0 100 05:45 PM 0 47 38 85 14 0 0 14 3 39 0 42 0 0 0 0 141 Total 0 164 124 288 35 0 3 38 25 96 0 121 0 0 0 0 447 Grand Total 0 473 314 787/ 80 0 11 911 56 207 0 2631 0 0 0 0.: I 1141 Apprch % 0.0 60.1 39.9 87.9 0.0 12.1 21.3 78.7 0.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 41.5 27.5 69.0. 7.0 0.0 1.0 8.0 4.9 18.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WSB & Associates, Inc. . 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 File Name: 169ramp-nb&csah15-8-25-04pm Minneapolis, MN 55422 (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000002 Start.Date : 08/25/2004 Page No :2 s[J T {:. 0~...J' U ~o ",s. -J North ::TO> o -' -0 en 0 <D ...", O2 /25/2004 3:00:00 PM -I c.,- j!:-+ f--- =f w /25/2004 5:45;00 PM "'0 8[J 0_ .s;: Unshifted ..... n ..r- ~ :: WSB & Associates, Inc. . . 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 File Name : 169ramp-nb&csah 15-8-25-04pm Minneapolis, MN 55422 (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 08/25/2004 Page No :3 164 124 288 35 0 3 38 25 96 0 121 0 0 0 0 447 56.9 43.1 92.1 0.0 .7.9 20.7 79.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 47 38 85 14 O. 0 14 3 39 0 42 0 0 0 0 141 0.793 05:45 PM 05:45 PM 05:45 PM 2:45:00 PM 0 47 38 85 14 0 0 14 3 39 0 42 0.847 0.679 0.720 WSB & Associates, Inc. . , 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy.Suite 300 169 NB Ramps & CSAH 15 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 169ramp-nb&csah 15-8-25-04am 6:00-9:00 AM Turning Movement (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000002 Shakopee, MN Start Date : 08/25/2004 August2004 Page No : 1 Start Time . Total Int. Total Factor 06:00 AM 53 2 16 0 71 06:15AM 63 2 29 0 94 06:30 AM 72 3 39 0 114 06:45 AM 74 2 32 0 108 Total 262 9 116 0 387 07:00 AM 0 13 83 96 5 0 0 5 22 12 0 34 0 0 0 0 135 07:15 AM 0 14 71 85 5 0 0 5 18 22 0 40 0 0 0 0 130 07:30 AM 0 14 59 73 8 0 0 8 17 24 0 41 0 0 0 0 122 07:45 AM 0 11 56 67 5 0 0 5 17 23 0 40 0 0 0 0 112 Total 0 52 269 321 23 0 0 23 74 81 0 155 0, 0 0 0_ 499 08:00 AM 0 9 41 50 4 0 0 4 10 14 0 24 0 0 0 0 78 08:15AM 0 18 25 43 0 0 1 1 9 9 0 18 0 0 0 0 62 08:30 AM 0 13 29 42 4 0 1 5 7 12 0 19 0 0 0 0 66 08:45 AM 0 18 31 49 5 0 1 6 7 15 0 22 0 0 0 0 77 Total 0 58 126 184 13 0 3 16 33 50 0 83 0 0 0 0 283 Grand Total 0 140 627 7671 45 0 3 481 171 183 0 354/ 0 0 0 0.: I 1169 Apprch % 0.0 18.3 81.7 93.8 0.0 6.3 48.3 51.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 12.0 53.6 65.6 3.8 0.0 0.3 4.1 14.6 15.7 0.0 30.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 WSB & Associates, Inc.. . 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name: 169ramp-nb&csah15-8-25-04am (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 08/25/2004 Page No :2 s[j i ~ o 'ii-.J" U! ~o <os. -' North ::r-l>. co ~ - th '" 0 <0 .,Jr:: O2 25/2004 6:00:00 AM i-:;! r::- ~--. W /25/2004 8:45:00 AM 20 8[j 0_ .s: Unshifled .- U r!!,,,, WSB & Associates, Inc. . . 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 169ramp-nb&csah 15-8-25-04am (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 08/25/2004 Page No :3 52 269 321 23 0 0 23 74 81 0 155 0 0 0 0 499 16.2 83.8 100.0 0.0 0.0 47.7 52.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 83 96 5 0 0 5 22 12 0 34 0 0 0 0 135 0.924 07:00 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 5:45:00 AM o. 13 83 96 8 0 0 8 17 24 0 41 0.836 0.719 0.945 WSB & Associates, Inc. , . 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 169 S8 Ramps & CSAH 15 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 169ramp-sb&csah 15-8-24-04pm 3:00-6:00 PM Turning Movement (763) 541-4800 Site Code :00000001 Shakopee, MN Start Date : 08/24/2004 August 2004 Page No :1. Start Time Int. Total Factor 03:00 PM 41 39 11 0 91 03:15 PM 41 73 12 0 126 03:30 PM 65 55 14 1 135 03:45 PM 40 64 21 0 125 . Total 187 231 58 1 477 04:00 PM 0 61 6 67 53 0 17 70 1 19 0 20 0 0 1 1 158 04:15PM 3 48 9 60 46 0 20 66 1 30 0 31 0 0 1 1 158 04:30 PM 0 56 8 64 61 0 22 83 0 19 0 19 1 0 0 1 167 04;45 PM 1 52 2 55 56 0 25 81 2 27 0 29 1 0 0 1 166 Total 4 217 25 246 216 0 84 300 4 95 0 99 2 0 2 4 649 05:00 PM 1 42 4 47 56 0 26 82 0 19 0 0 0 0 148 05:15 PM 1 39 7 47 57 1 24 82 0 21 0 0 1 1 151 05:30 PM 0 40 5 45 72 0 16 88 0 32 0 0 0 0 165 05;45 PM 0 45 1 46 50 0 24 74 1 30 0 0 2 2 152 Total 2 166 17 185 235 1 90 326 1 102 0 0 3 3 616 Grand Total 7 542 69 6181 608 1 248 8571 7 251 1 2591 2 0 6 0.: I 1742 Apprch % 1.1 87.7 11.2 70.9 0.1 28.9 49.2 2.7 96.9 0.4 25.0 0.0 75.0 Total % 0.4 31.1 4.0 35.5 34.9 0.1 14.2 0.4 14.4 0.1 14.9 0.1 0.0 0.3 , ., WSB & Associates, Inc. ,. 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name 169ramp-sb&csah 15-8-24-04pm (763) 541-4800 Site Code 00000001 Start Date:08/24/2004 Page No '2 -~ .l!l~ T ~~ 0 Ul'5i~ I- Um ~ North :TO m ~ -'" m co Ul "c: O2 +-:;1 "'- /24/2004 3:00:00 PM 0 F=-' a:: /24/2004 5:45:00 PM 2~ 8~ N_ .r::. Unshifted ,... U ,r-" I\) ;:1>'" , '" , , WSB & Associates, Inc, ( , 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 169ramp-sb&csah 15-8-24-04pm (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 08/24/2004 Page No :3 217 25 246 216 0 84 300 4 95 0 99 2 0 2 4 649 88.2 10.2 72.0 0.0 28.0 4.0 96.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 56 8 64 61 0 22 83 0 19 0 19 1 0 0 1 167 0.972 04:00 PM 04:30 PM 04:15 PM 04:00 PM 0 61 6 67 61 0 22 83 1 30 0 31 0 0 1 1 0.918 0.904 0.798 1.000 WSB & Associates, Inc. . , t-l 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 169 sa Ramps & CSAH 15 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 169ramp-sb&csah 15-8-24-04am 6:00-9:00 AM Turning Movement (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000001 Shakopee, MN Start Date : 08/24/2004 August 2004 Page No : 1 Start Time . Total Int. Total Factor .06:00 AM 54 18 5 0 77 06:15AM 59 13 14 1 87 06:30 AM 78 9 21 0 108 06:45 AM 66 24 19 0 109 Total 257 64 59 1 381 07:00 AM 1 90 8 99 8 0 6 14 1 16 0 17 0 0 1 1 131 07:15AM 0 74 6 80 16 0 2 18 0 23 0 23 0 0 0 0 121 07:30 AM 0 78 5 83 19 0 5 24 1 23 0 24 0 0 0 0 131 07:45 AM 0 60 3 63 19 0 5 24 1 31 0 32 0 0 0 0 119 Total 1 302 22 325 62 0 18 80 3. 93 0 96 0 0 1 1 502 08:00 AM 1 45 1 47 20 0 5 25 1 15 0 16 0 0 1 1 89 08:15AM 1 42 4 47 5 0 1 6 2 17 0 19 0 0 1 1 73 08:30 AM 0 30 3 33 9 0 2 11 0 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 58 08:45 AM 2 28 4 34 12 0 3 15 1 11 0 12 0 0 0 0 61 Total 4 145 12 161 46 0 11 57 4 57 0 61 0 0 2 2 281 Grand Total 7 687 49 7431 166 0 35 201/ 10 206 0 216/ 1 0 3 0.: I 1164 Apprch % 0.9 92.5 6.6 82.6 0.0 17:4 .17.3 4.6 95.4 0.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 Total % 0.6 59.0 4.2 63.8 14.3 0.0 3.0 0.9 17.7 0.0 18.6 0.1 0.0 0.3 r . ~ WSB & Associates, Inc. . . 4150 Olson Memorial HwySuite300 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 169ramp.;sb&csah 15-8-24-04am (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000001 Start.Oate : 08/24/2004 Page No :2 7 49 'hI Left 4 s~ T ~~ {!. "'~-.1 ~~ North CD ~ -' ::TO> 0> ~ ...0> CD "'c O2 ~:;! "'- /24/2004 6:00:00 AM 0 F=-----' a:: /24/2004 8:45:00 AM 20 8D ...- .s:: Unshifted r- U ..r~ ~ WSB & Associates, Inc. . . 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name: 169ramp-sb&csah15-8-24-04am (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 08/24/2004 Page No :3 302 22 325 62 0 18 80 3 93 0 96 0 0 1 1 502 92.9 6.8 77.5 0.0 22.5 3.1 96.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 78 5 83 19 0 5 24 1 23 0 24 0 0 0 0 131 0.958 07:00 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM 07:00 AM 1 90 8 99 19 0 5 24 1 31 0 32 0 0 1 1 0.821 0.833 0.750 0.250 . Station Name:Co.Rd 79 (N of.17th aye) Site ID:01281 0000690 Station Num:000000000003 . Description: City: Shakopee County: Start. DatelTime:08/24/04 00:00 End DatelTime:08/24/04 23:59 8/24/2004 Lane 1 (South) 00:00 39 01:00 . 13 02:00 11 03:00 10 04:00 11 05:00 87 06:00 203 . 07:00 430 08:00 292 09:00 204 10:00 225 11:00 281 12:00 306 13:00 314 14:00 334 15:00 441 16:00 561 17:00 576 18:00 469 19:00 358 .. 20:00 345 21:00 227 22:00 125 23:00 77 , AM Peak HoUl 07:00 - 07:59 AM Peak Value 430 PM Peak HoUl 17:00 - 17:59 PM Peak Value 576 .~ .. Total 5939 Percentaaes 100.00% Printedon 27-Aug-04 at 13:10 Daily Volume Page 1 of 2 ~ Station Name:Co.Rd 79 (N of 17th aye) Site1D:012810000690 Station. Num:000000000003 ~ Description: City:Shakopee County: Start Date/Time:08/25/04 00:00 End Date/Time:08/25/04 23:59 8/25/2004 Lane 1 (South) 00:00 49 .. 01:00 26 02:00 15 03:00 7 04:00 22 05:00 - 71 06:00 246 07:00 401 -- 08:00 276 09:00 . 227 10:00 ~ 240 . 11:00 306 12:00 .. 318 13:00 296 14:00 321 15:00 464 16:00 578 17:00 616 18:00 527 19:00 454 20:00 383 21:00 214 22:00 -~ 23:00 61 . AM Peak Hour 07:00 - 07:59 AM Peak Value 401 PM Peak Hour 17:00 - 17:5~_ PM Peak Value 616 .. Total 6254 Percentanes 100.00% ~ printed on 27-Aug-04 at 13:10 Daily Volume Page 2 of 2 . Station Name:Co.Rd 79 & (S of 17th ave) Site 10:012810000690 Station Num:OOOOOOOOOO04 Description: City:Shakopee County: Start Daterrime:08/24/04 00:00 End Datemme:08/24/04 23:59 8/24/2004 Lane 1 (South) 00:00 26 01:00 12 02:00 10 03:00 10 04:00 8 05:00 53 06:00 141 07:00 280 08:00 205 09:00 150 10:00 1.61 11:00 193 12:00 196 13:00 209 14:00 237 15:00 311 16:00 .. 365 17:00 381 18:00 322 19:00 206 20:00 210 21:00 . 140 22:00 90 23:00 58 AM Peak HoUl 07:00 - 07:59 AM Peak Value 280 PM Peak Houl 17:00 -17:59 PM Peak Value 381 Total 3974 Percentaaes 100.00% Printed on 27-Aug-04 at 13:07 Daily Volume Page 1 of 2 . Station Name:Co.Rd 79 &(S of 17th ave) Site 10:012810000690 Station Num:000000000004 . Description: City: Shakopee County: Start Datemme:08/25/04 00:00 End DatelTime:08/25/0423:59 8/25/2004 Lane 1 (South) 00:00 40 01:00 17 02:00 7 03:00 8 04:00 14 05:00 38 06:00 153 07:00 254 08:00 187 09:00 154 10:00 157 11:00 200 12:00 188 13:00 185 14:00 198 15:00 280 . 16:00 351 17:00 368 18:00 333 19:00 294 20:00 269 21:00 160 22:00 91 23:00 44 AM Peak HoUl 07:00 - 07:59 AM Peak Value 254 PM Peak Houl 17:00 -17:59 PM Peak Value 368 .. -, Total 3990 Percenta~es 100.00% Printed on 27-Aug~04 at 13:07 Daily Volume Page 2 of 2 . Station Name:Co. Rd. 77 (between 169&128th st) Site ID:01281 0000690 Station Num:000000000002 . Description: City:Shakopee County: Start DatelTime:08/24/04 00:00 End DatelTime:08/24/04 23:59 8/24/2004 Lane 1 (South) 00:00 4 01:00 6 02:00 2 03:00 3 04:00 2 05:00 9 06:00 48 07:00 88 08:00 61 09:00 40 10:00 54 11:00 55 12:00 61 13:00 54 14:00 ' 61 15:00 74 16:00 101 17:00 104 18:00 84 19:00 80 20:00 63 21:00 41 22:00 17 23:00 14 AM Peak Houl 07:00 -07:59 AM Peak Value 88 PM Peak HoUl 17:00 - 17:59 PM Peak Value 104 Total 1126 Percentaaes 100.00% _ Printed on 27-Aug-04 at13: 16 Daily Volume Page 1 of2 . Station. Name:Co. Rd. 77 (between 169& 128th st) Site 10:012810000690 Station Num:000000000002 . Description: City: Shakopee County: Start Dateffime:08/25/04 00:00 End Dateffime:08/25/04 23:59 8/25/2004 Lane 1 (South) 00:00 7 01:00 5 02:00 6 03:00 4 04:00 , 2 05:00 8 06:00 45 07:00 84 08:00 64 09:00 . 51 10:00 34 11:00 50 12:00 57 .13:00 64 14:00 53 15:00 63 16:00 103 17:00 126 18:00 89 19:00 70 20:00 76 21:00 46 22:00 29 23:00 19 AM Peak HoUl 07:00 - 07:59 AM Peak Value 84 PM Peak HoUl 17:00 - 17:59 PM Peak Value 126 Total 1155 Percentaaes 100.00% Printed on 27 -Aug-04 at 13: 16 Daily Volume Page 2 of2 . Station Name:CSAH 15 (S of 169 Ramps) Site ID:01281 0000690 Station Num:000000000001 . Description: City:Shakopee County: Start DatelTime:08/24/04 00:00 End DatefTime:08/24/04 23:59 8/24/2004 Lane 1 (South) 00:00 11 01:00 6 02:00 3 03:00 6 04:00 18 05:00 61 06:00 139 07:00 190 08:00 139 09:00 110 . 10:00 93 11:00 107 12:00 123 13:00 122 14:00 144 15:00 205 16:00 280 17:00 263 18:00 225 19:00 .. 167 20:00 134 21:00 111 22:00 53 23:00 37 I AM Peak HaUl 07:00 - 07:59 AM Peak Value 190 PM Peak Hour 16:00 -16:59 PM Peak Value 280 . Total 2747 Percentaaes 100.00% Pr,inted on 27-Aug-04 at 13:13 Daily Volume Page 1 of 2 . Station Name:CSAH 15 (S of 169 Ramps) Site 10:012810000690 Station Num:000000000001 . Description: City:Shakopee , County: Start Date/Time:08/25/04 00:00 End Date/Time:08/25/04,23:59 8/25/2004 Lane 1 (South) 00:00 19 01:00 10 02:00 5 03:00 7 04:00 14 05:00 62 06:00 149 07:00 205 08:00 149 09:00 108 10:00 85 11:00 111 12:00 .. 142 13:00 125 14:00 163 15:00 200 16:00 268 17:00 292 18:00 237 19:00 189 20:00 155 21:00 96 22:00 59 23:00 22 .. AM Peak Haul 07:00 - 07:59 AM Peak Value 205 PM Peak HaUl 17:00 - 17:59 PM Peak Value 292 Total 2B72 Percentaaes 100.00% Printed on 27 -Aug-04 at 13: 13 Daily Volume Page 2 of2 . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.ld - TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSBand Associates Inc Da te Performed: , 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: CR79 at 17th Avenue Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary , Analysis Year: Existing 2004 Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 79 Intersection Orientation:EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R . Volume 15 119 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate; HFR 15 119 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound . -"~-... Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 155 21 72 62 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 155 21 72 62 Percent': Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approac~: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 0 1 Configuration T R LT Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 LaneConfig L I T R I LT v (vph) 15 155 21 134 C(m) (vph) 1636 739 1091 769 v/c 0.01 0.21 0.02 0.17 95% queue length 0.03 0.79 0.06 0.63 Control Delay 7.2 11. 2 8.4 10.7 LOS A B A B Approach Delay 10.8 10.7 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4~ld . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY - Analyst: Chuck Rick'art Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: .9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CR 79 at 17th Avenue Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Existing 2004 Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 79 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T. R Volume 44 ,- 131 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 44 131 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 108 26 152 186 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 108 26 152 186 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: EXists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 0 1 Configuration T R LT Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I T R I LT v . (vph) 44 108 26 338 C (m) (vph) 1636 665 1091 735 v/c 0.03 0.16 0.02 0.46 95% queue length 0.08 0.58 0.07 2.43 Control' Delay 7.3 11.5 8.4 14,.0 LOS A B A B P...pproach Delay 10.9 14.0 Approach LOS B B . ,HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY - Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency /Co. : WSB and Associates lnc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 No Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units:U.S. Customary _ Analysis Year: Existing 2004 project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: TH 169 No Ramp, North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation:NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 93 3 22 302 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 . Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 93 3 22 302 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 18 62 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 62 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared-Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 22 18 62 C(m) (vph) 1510 674 1020 v/c 0.01 0.03 0.06 95% queue length 0.04 0.08 0.19 Control Delay 7.4 10.5 8.8 LOS A B A Approach Delay 9.1 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency /Co. :. WSBand Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time 2eriod: PM Peak Hour Intersectiop: CSAH 15 at TH 169 No Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units:U. S. Customary Analysis.Year: Existing 2004 Project ID: Country Side /.High School EAW East/West Street: TH 169 No Ramp North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Ma~or Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Move.ment 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 95 4 25 217 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 95 4 25 217 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided I RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 84 216 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1..00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 84 216 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage I I Lanes 1 .1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 25 84 216 C (m) (vph) 1507 707 1017 v/c 0.02 0.12 0.21 95% queue length 0.05 0.40 0.80 Control Delay 7.4 10.8 9.5 LOS A B A Approach Delay 9.9 Approach LOS A . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersection9 Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co. : WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at, TH 169 So Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Existing 2004 Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: TH 169 So Ramp North/South Street: CSAH15 Intersection Orientation: NS Stuc!y period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 81 74 269 52 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 81 74 269 52 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor. Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 23 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Gr.ade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v. (vph) 269 1 23 C(m) (vph) 1438 332 1029 v/c 0.19 0.00 0.02 95% queue length 0.69 0.01 0.07 Control Delay 8.1 15.9 8.6 LOS A C A Approach Delay 8.9 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 So Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Existing 2004 Project 10: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: TH 169 So Ramp North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.2q Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L. T R .1 L T R . Volume 51 17 190 108 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 51 17 190 108 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 4 22 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 4 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movemen.t 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 LaneConfig LT I L R I v (vph) 190 4 22 C(m) (vph) 1546 453 1050 v/c 0.12 0.01 0.02 95% queue' length 0.42 0.03 0.06 Control Delay 7.7 13.0 8.5 LOS A B A Approach Delay 9.2 Approach LOS A . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: CR 79 at 17th Avenue Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 79 Intersection Orie~tation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Maj or Street:' Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 88 231 49 79 282 142 Peak~Hour Factor, PI1F 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 88 231 49 79 282 142 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R 'L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 49 198 52 86 108 133 Peak Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 49 198 52 86 108 133 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade {I) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R~ L T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service App.roach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L T R I L T R v (vph) 88 79 49 198 52 86 108 . 133 C(m) (vph) 1146 1294 256 299 .921 202 334 888 vlc 0.08 0.06 0.19 0.66 0.06 0.43 0.32 0.15 95% queue length 0.25 0.19 0.69 4.37 0.18 . 1. 96 1. 37 0.53 Control Delay 8.4 8.0 22.4 37.8 9.1 35.4 20.8 9.8 LOS A A C E A E C A Approach Delay 30.3 20.2 Approach LOS D C . HCS200D.: Unsignalize~ Inte~sections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CR 79 at 17th Avenue Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S.Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project 10: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue ' North/South Street: CR 79 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 118 243 60 72 250 156 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 LOa LOa 1.00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 118 243 60 72 250 156 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- a -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T -R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 86 107 72 181 231 119 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 86 107 72 181 231 119 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / I Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration . L T R L T R Delay, Queue Length,andLevel of Servite Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L T R I L T R v (vph) 118 72 86 107 72 181 231 119 C (m) (vph) 1164 1269 148 282 913 249 313 909 vlc 0.10 0.06 0.58 0.38 0.08 0.73 0.74 0.13 95% queue length 0.34 0.18 3.00 1. 70 0.26 5.02 5.50 0.45 Control Delay 8.4 8.0 58.5 25.4 9.3 50.2 43.0 9.6 LOS A A F D A F E .A Approach Delay 31. 8 38.0 Approach LOS 0 E . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY S~OPCONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at HS Entrance Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project ID: .Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: HS Entrance Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Maj or Street:. Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 20 236 118 210 245 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 236 118 210 245 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- O. -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 92 2 51 91 2 30 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 92 2 51 91 2 30 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent G,rade. (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT R I LTR v (vph) 20 210 94 51 123 C(m) (vph) 1316. 1216 309 918 341 v/c 0.02 0.17 0.30 0.06 0.36 95% queue le~gth 0.05 0.62 1. 25 0.18 1. 60 Control Delay 7.8 8.6 21.7 9.2 21.4 LOS A A C A C Approach Delay 17.3 21.4 Approach LOS C C . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at HS Entrance Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project ID: CountrySide / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: HS Entrance Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 60 264 30 68 320 45 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 60 264 30 68 320 45 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street:. Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 137 2 72 52 2 17 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 137 2 72 52 2 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) . . 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT R I LTR v (vph) 60 68 139 72 71 C (m) (vph) 1205. 1279 405 899 434 v/c 0.05 0.05 0.34 0.08 0.16 95% queue length 0.16 0.17 1. 50 0.26 0.58 Control Delay 8.1. 8.0 18.5 9.4 14.9 LOS A A C A B Approach Delay 15.4 14.9 Approach LOS C B . Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d HCS2000: . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co. : WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 AnalysrsTime Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at CR 77 Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. s. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build ,proj ect ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 77 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 ) L T R I L T R . Volume 9 378 4 15 325 36 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 378 4 15 325 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Ra.ised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 12 88 17 44 28 7 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 88 17 44 28 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L T R I L T R v (vph) 9 15 12 88 17 44 28 7 C(m) (vph) 1209 1188 461 418 827 422 427 861 v/c 0.01. 0.01 0.03 0.21 0.02 0.10 0.07 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 0.04 0.08 0.79 0.06 0.35 0.21 0.02 Control Delay 8.0 8.1 13.0 15.9 9.4 14.5 14.0 9.2 LOS A A B C A B B A Approach Delay 14.7 13.9 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY .' Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co. : WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at CR 77 Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project ID: Country,Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 77 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Vo+umes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 24 314 21 23 430 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 24 314 21 23 430 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- a -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb I 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: . Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 25 51 3 33 98 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 25 51 3 33 98 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / I Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane.Config L L I L T R I L T R v (vph) 24 23 25 51 3 33 98 5 C (m) (vph) 1126 1236 379 386 867 396 387 796 vie 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.13 0.00 0.08 0.25 0.01 95% queue length 0.07 0.06 0.21 0.45 0.01 0.27 0.99 0.0.2 Control Delay 8.3 8.0 15.2 15.7 9.2 14.9 17.4 9.6 LOS A A C C A B C A F:..ppl:oach Delay 15.3 16.5 Approach LOS C C . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d ~ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSBand Associate.s Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at Dev. Entrance Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: Development Entrance Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 6 316 4 18 319 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 316 "- 4 18 319 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 21 2 12 35 2 12 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 2 12 35 2 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Gr'iide ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / LClnes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 6 18 35 49 C(m) (vph) 1247 1251 594 562 v/c 0.00 0.01 0.06 0.09 95% queue length 0.01 0.04 0.19 0.29 Control Delay 7.9 7.9 11. 4 12.0 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 11..4 12.0 Approach LOS B B . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTR01 SUMMARY - Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at Dev. Entrance Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project ID: Country Side/ High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: Development Entrance Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ~ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 1 T R I 1 T R Volume 18 315 17 46 378 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 315 17 46 378 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- a -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb /1 RT Channeli.zed? No No 1anes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration 1 T R 1 T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 1 T R I 1 T R Volume 14 2 9 21 2 7 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 2 9 21 2 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / 1anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration 1TR 1TR Delay, Qu~ue 1ength,and 1~vel of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 1ane Config 1 1 I 1TR I 1TR v (vph) 18 46 25 30 C(m) (vph) 1177 1239 538 473 v/c 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.06 95% queue length 0.05 0.12 0.15 0.20 Control Delay 8.1 8< 0 12.0 13.1 10S A A B B Approach Delay 12.0 13.1 Approach 10S B B . Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d HCS2000: . TWO-WAY STOP CONTR01 SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co. : WSB and Associates rnc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time period: AM' Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at CSAH 15 Jurisdiction: .,Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project ID:Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/Sout~ Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 1 T R I 1 T R Volume 184 106 220 63 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hpurly Flow Rate, HFR 184 106 220 63 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 0 1 Configuration T R 1T ' Upstream Signal?, No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 109 243 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.Q.o 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 109 243 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration 1 R Delay, Queue Length, arid Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config 1T I L R I v (vph) 220 109 243 C (m) (vph) 1283 .345 864 v/c 0.17 0.32 0.28 95% queue length 0.62 1. 33 1.16 Control Delay 8.4, 20.2 10.8 10S A C B Approach Delay 13.7 Approach LOS B HCS2000: . Unsignal~zed Intersections Release 4w1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analys.t: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at CSAH15 Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S.Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project ID: Country Side /High School EAW East/West .Street: 17th Avenue North/South Stree~: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) :. 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustment.s Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L. T R Volume 81 100 250 231 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 81 100 250 231 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 0 1 Configuration T R LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Vol.ume 136 263 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 136 263 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 250 136 263 C (m) (vph) 1407 289 985 v/c 0.18 0.47 0.27. 95% queue length 0.65 2.37 1. 08 Control Delay 8.1 28.1 10.0- LOS A D A Approach Delay 16.1 Approach LOS C . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection.: CSAH 15 at TH 169 No Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Buil'd Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: TH 169 No Ramp North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 . L T R I L T R Volume 243 . 7 26 563 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 243 7 26 563 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 34 74 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 34 74 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) - 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service .Approach NB . SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 26 34 74 C (m) (vph) 1327 444 913 v/c 0.02 0.08 0.08 95% queue length 0.06 0.25 9.26 Control Delay 7.8 13;8 9.3 LOS "A B A Approach Delay 10.7 Approach LOS B . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co. : WSB and Associates Inc /" Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 No Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build ProjectID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: TH 169 No Ramp North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R . Volume 270 14 30 336 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1..00 1.00 Hourly Flow .Rate, HFR 270 14 30 336 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided I RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 130 306 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 130 306 Percent Beavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared 'Approach: Exists?/Storage I I Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v. (vph) 30 130 306 C(m) (vph) 1290 495 895 v/c 0.02 0.26 0.34 95% queue length 0.07 1. 04 1. 53 ,Control Delay 7.9 lL8 11.1 LOS A B B Approach Delay 12.2 Approach LOS B - HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Rel~ase 4.1d , TWQ-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associat~s Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 So Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project ID: Country Side/ High School EAW East/West Street: TH 169 So Ramp North/Sout~ Street: . C,SAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound . Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R' I L T. R Volume 223 204 320 277 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 223 204 320 277 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 6 27 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 27 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lane::; 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound EastbOund Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 320 6 27 C(m) (vph) 1143 175 926 v/c 0.28 0.03 0.03 95% queue length 1.15 0.11 0.09 Control Delay 9.4 26.3 9.0 LOS A D A Approach Delay 12.1 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Un~ignalized Intersections Release 4.ld ~, TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 So Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: TH 169 So Ramp North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 258 86 129 466 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 258 86 129 466 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor. Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 15 26 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 26 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: ExistS?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 129 15 26 C(m) (vph) 1226 315 903 v/c 0.11 0.05 0.03 95% queue length 0.35 0.15 0.09 Control Delay 8.3 17.0 9.1 LOS A C A Approach Delay 12.0 Approach LOS B . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d .., . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates rnc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: CR 79 at 17th Avenue Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build Project ID: Country Side/ High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 79 Intersection Orient~tion: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 100 271 53 89 344 220 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 100 271 53 89 344 220 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 68 299 66 133 149 162 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 68 299 66 133 149 162 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R 1 T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 1ane Config 1 L I L T R I L T R v (vph) 100 89 68 299 66 133 149 162 C (m) (vph) 1018 1247 168 232 894 73 286 848 v/c 0.10 0.07 0.40 1. 29 0.07 1. 82 0.52 0.19 95% queue .length 0.33 0.23 1. 79 15.57 0.24 11.75 2.80 0.70 Control Delay 8.9 8.1 40.3 200.5 9.3 512.4 30.5 10.2 10S A A E F A F D B Approach Delay 146.2 167.5 Approach 10S F F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d w ~ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co. : WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CR 79 at 17th Avenue Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 79 Intersection Orientation:. EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 142 296 79 101 315 242 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. O~O 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 142 296 79 101 315 242 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- a -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L e T R Volume 110 155 89 280 352 149 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 110 155 89 280 352 149 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L T R I L T R v (vph) 142 101 110 155 89 280 352 149 C(m) (vph) 1024 1195 0 190 878 123 232 866 v/c 0.14 a.! 08 0.82 0.10 2.28 1. 52 0.17 95% queue length 0.48 - -0.28 5.74 0.34 24.00 21. 22 0.62 Control Delay 9.1 8.3 75.6 9.6 656.8 292.3 10.0+ LOS A A F F A F F B Approach Delay 369.1 Approach LOS F . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency / Co. : WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at HS Entrance Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units:U. S.'Customary Analysis Year:, 2025Full Build Project ID: Country Side /High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: liS Entrance Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hr s) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eas'tbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 -I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 20 294 118 210 355 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF LOO LOO 1.00 LOO LOO LaO Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 294 118 210 355 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 92 2 51 91 2 30 Peak Hour Factor, PHF LOO LOO 1. 00 1..00 1. 00 1. 00 HourLy FLow Rate, HFR 92 2 51 91 2 30 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percept Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT R I LTR v (vph) 20 210 94 51 123 C(m) (vph) 1200 1158 274 880 290 v/c 0.02 0.18 0.34 0~06 0.42 95% queue length 0.05 0.66 L47 0.18 2.02 Control Delay 8.1 8.8 24.8 9.3 26.3 LOS A A C A D Approach Delay 19.4 26.3 Approach LOS C D HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . - TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM .. Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at HS Entrance Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysi.s Year: 2025 Full Build Project tD: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: HS Entrance Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hr s) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound . Movemen t 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 60 30 68 438 45 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 LOO LOO 1.00 LOO Hourly Flow Rate, .HFR 60 30 68 438 45 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 137 2 72 52 2 17 Peak Hour Factor, PHF LOO L 00 LOO LOO LOO LOO Ho~rly Flow Rate, .HFR 137 2 72 52 2 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Length, and. Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT R I LTR v (vph).. 60 68 139 72 71 C(m) (vph) 1090 1179 343 838 366 v/c 0.06 0.06 0.41 0.09 0.19 95% queue length 0.17 0.18 1. 90 0.28 0.71 Control Delay 8.5 8.2 22.5 9.7 17.2 LOS A A C A C Approach Delay 18.1 17.2 Approach LOS C C . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at CR 77 Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analys,is Year: 2025 Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street:. 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 77 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound -Movemen t 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 13 424 6 19 419 47 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 Loo Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 424 6 19 419 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 14 131 24 50 42 9 Peak Hour Factor,PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly ~low Rate, HFR 14 131 24 50 42 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L T R / L T R v (vph) 13 19 14 131 24 50 42 9 C (m) (vph) 1106 1140 399 364 800 328 375 802 v/c 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.36 0.03 0.15 0.11 0.01 95% queue length 0.04 0.05 0.11 1. 60 0.09 0.53 0.38 0.03 Control Delay 8.3 8.2 14.4 20.3 9.6 17.9 15.8 9.5 LOS A A B C A C C A Approach Delay 18.3 16.3 Approach LOS C C ." .. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . - - TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB andAssociatesInc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at CR 77 Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 77 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 37 402 30 31 538 17 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 37 402 30 31 538 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 - 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 31 68 4 41 149 8 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 68 4 41 149 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared.Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L T R I L T R v. (vph) 37 31 31 68 4 41 149 8 C (m) (vph) 1026 1138 258 310 813 306 313 735 v/c 0.04 0.03 0.12 0.22 0.00 0.13 0.48 0.01 95% queue length 0.11 0.08 0.40 0.82 0.01 0.46 2.44 0.03 Control Delay 8.6 8.3 20.8 19.8 9.4 18.6 26.5 10.0- LOS A A C C A C D A Approach Delay 19.7 24.2 Approach LOS C C . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at Dev.Entrance Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build Project Ip: Count~y Side/ High School EAW East/WestrStreet: 17th Avenue North/South Street: Development Entrance Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major. Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 6 368 4 18 418 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 368 4 18 418 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 21 2 12 35 2 12 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 2 12 35 2 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade.. (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration. LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 6 18 35 49 C(m) (vph) 1147 1198 541 493 v/c 0.01 0.02 0.06 0.10 95% queue length 0..02 0.05 0.21. 0.33 Control Delay 8.2 8.1 12.1 13.1 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 12.1 13.1 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency ICo. : WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at Dev. Entrance Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build Project ID: Country Side I High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: Development Entrance Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 18 424 17 46 495 15 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, .HFR 18 424 17 46 495 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- a -- -- Median Type/Stor~ge Raised curb I 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 14 2 9 21 2 7 Peak Hour Factor,2HF 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 2 9 21 2 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Appro~c'h: Exists?/Storage No I No I Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR. LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 18 46 25 30 C(m) (vph) 1065 1130 462 398 vlc 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.08 95% queue length 0.05 0.13 0.17 0.24 Control Delay 8.4 8.3 13.2 14.8 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 13.2 14.8 Approach LOS B B . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency /Co. : WSB and Associates rnc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM .Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at CSAH 15 Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Ye.ar: 2025 Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 285 122 256 78 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flo~ Rate, HFR 285 122 256 78 P~rceQ~ Beavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 0 1 Configuration T R LT Upstream Signa11 No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 134 317 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1..00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 134 317 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration .L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 256 134 317 C (m) (vph) 1163 251 759 v/c 0.22 0.53 0.42 95% queue length 0.84 2.87 2.07 Control Delay 9.0 34.7 13.1 LOS A D B Approach Delay 19.5 Approach LOS C - HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at CSAH 15 Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: u. S. Customary Analysis Year:. 2025 Full Build Project ID: Country Side /.High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation:NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 126 128 332 358 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 126 128 332 358 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 0 1 Configuration T R LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor .Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 177 339 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly FlowRate,HFR 177 339 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 332 177 339 C (m) (vph) 1323 166 930 v/c 0.25 1.07 0.36 95% queue length 1. 00 8.86 1. 68 Control Delay 8.6 144.7 11.1 LOS A F B Approach Delay 56.9 Approach LOS F . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co. : WSB and Associates Ine Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 No Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: u. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build Proje.ct'ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: TH 169 No Ramp North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 340 11 34 721 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 340 11 34 721 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream $ignal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 43 96 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 43 96 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent,Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 34 43 96 C(m) (vph) 1219 332 851 v/c 0.03 0.13 0.11 95% queue length 0.09 0.44 0.38 Control Delay 8.0 17.5 9.8 LOS A C A Approach Delay 12.1 Approach LOS B . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.~d. - . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: . WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PMPeak.Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 No Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build Project ID: Country' Side /High School EAW Eas.t/West Street: TH169 No Ramp North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 366 16 39 606 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 366 16 39 606 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 234 335 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 234 335 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1. 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 39 234 335 C (m) (vph) . 1188 341 834 v/e 0.03 0.69 0.40 95% queue length 0.10 4.82 1. 95 Control Delay 8.1 35.8 12.2 LOS A E B Approach Delay 21.9 Approach LOS C . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d ~ ~ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates rnc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 So Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Uni ts: u. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build Project 10: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: TH 169 So Ramp North/South Street: CSAH15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 315 287 417 347 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 315 . 287 417 347 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 7 36 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 417 7 36 C(m) (vph) 985 86 866 vlc 0.42 0.08 0.04 95% queue length 2.14 0.26 0.13 Control Delay 11. 3 50.5 9.3 LOS B F A Approach Delay 16.0 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . . ~ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ~ Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 16~ So Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary. Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build Project ID: Couritry Side/ High School EAW East/West Street: TH 169 So Ramp North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 348 117 168 672 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 348 117 168 672 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 18 34 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Sto;rage I I Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 168 18 34 C(m) (vph) 1107 200 846 v/e 0.15 0.09 0.04 95% queue length 0.53 0.29 0.13 Control belay 8.8 24..8 9.4 LOS A C A Approach Delay 14.7 Approach LOS B ~ . .. ~ APPENDIX D Department of Natural Resources Letter, State Historical Preservation Office Letter, and Prime Agricultural Soils Map ~ IUI-G1, ., ~ " MinneS~fhQHJrl~tmN!!taQfR~~MK61la~~9SUrCeS 500 Lafayette Road , St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-40 Phone: (651) 296-7863 . Fax: (651) 296-1811 E-mail: sarah.hoffmann@dnr.state.rnn.us . F~f""' i"'!"'~ .~, .. r /' "'fF\ r i ~I -I"" t j ~~'. .:l\.~..) .':.. :;i.r.,,~ ':-:';\~ August 13,2004 AUG 1 6 ,~..4 Ryan Hughes WSB & ASSQCIATES WSR & Associates, Inc. 4150 OlsonMemorial Highway Minneapolis, MN 55422 Re: Request for Natural Heritage information for vicinity of proposed Countryside Residential Development, T115N R23W Section 13, Scott County NHNRP Contact#: ERDB 20050113 Dear Mr. Hughes, The Minnesota Natural Heritage database has been reviewed to determine if any rare plant or animal species or other significant natural features are known to occur within an approximate one-mile radius of the areaindicated on the map enclosed with your information requestBased onthis review, there are no known occurrences of rare species or natura.l communities in the. area searched. The Natural Heritage database is maintained. by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, a unit within the Division of Ecological Services, Department of Natural Resources. It is continua.lly updated as hew information becomes available, andis the most complete source of data on Minnesota's rare or otherwise significant species, natura.l communities, and other natural features. Its purpose. is to foster better understanding and protection of these features. Because our information is not based on a comprehensive inventory, there may be rare or otherwise significant natural features in the state that are not represented in the database. A county-by., county survey of rare natural features is now underway, and has been completed for Scott County. Our information about natural communities is, therefor.e, quite thorough for that county. However, because survey work for rare plants and anima.ls is less exhaustive, and because there has not been an on-site survey of aU areas of the county, ecologically significant features for which we have no records may exist on the project area. Please be aware that review by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program focuses only on rare natural features. It does not constitute review or approval by the Department of Natural Resources as a whole. If you require further information on the environmenta.l review. process for other wildlife- . related issues, you may contact your Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist, Wayne Barstad, at. (651)772-7940. An invoice for the work completed will be mailed to you under separate cover within two weeks of the date of this letter. You are being billed for map and database search and staff scientist review. Thank you for consulting us on this matter, and for your interest in preserving Minnesota's rare natura.l resources. ~:U~ if#(~ Sarah D.Hoffmann Endangered Species Environmental Review Coordinator DNR Information: 651-296-6157 . 1-888-646-6367 . TrY: 651-296-5484 . 1-800-657 -3929 An Equal Opportunity Employer ~. Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a ~1 Minimum of I O'7c Post-Consumer Waste ~ Page 10f2 ~ , ,Ryan Hughes ~ ~ From: Cinadr, Thomas. [thomas.cinadr@mnhs.orgJ Sent: . Tuesday, August 03,200410:44 AM To: Ryan Hughes Subject: RE: Information Request No archaeological sites or standing structures were identified in a search o:ftheMinnesota SHPO cultural resource databases for the requested search. A list of historic structures for the search area is attached. . The result of this database search provides a listing of recorded archaeological sites and historic architectural properties that are included in the currentSHPO databases. Because the majority of archaeological sites in the sta.te and many historic architectural properties have not been recorded, important sites or structures may exist within the search area and may be affected by development projects within that area. Additional research, including field survey, may be necessary to adequately assess the area's potential to contain historic properties. With regard to Environmental AssessmentW orksheets (EA W), a negative known site/structure response from the SHPO databases is not necessarily appropriate information on which to base a "No" response to EA W Question 25a. It is the-Responsible Governmental Unit's (RGU) obligation to verify the accuracy of the information contained within the EAW. A "No" response to Question 25a without written justification should be carefully considered. c If you require a comprehensive assessment of a project's potential to impact archaeological sites or historic architectural properties, you may need to hire a qualified archaeologist and/or historian.Pleasecontactthe SHPOby phone at 651-296-5434 or by email atmnsh12Q@mnhs.org for current lists of professional consultants in these fields. Tom Cinadt Survey and Information Management Coordinator Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office Minnesota Historical Society 345 Kellogg Blvd. West St. Paul,MN 55102 651-205-4197 (voice) 651'...282-2374 (fax) -----Original.Message----- From: Ryan Hughes [mailto:RHughes@wsbeng.com] ~ent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 12:33 PM To: Cinadr, Thomas Cc: Andrea Moffatt SubJect: . Information Request Hello Mr.Cinadr, Attached, is a letter to request a historical, archeological, and architectural review for a site in the City of Shakopee as well as an 'aerial photo and USGS map to aid in your research. Please forward any information you have concerning this site as soon as possible. If you have any questions feel free to email or call me at the number below. Thank you. 8/5/2004 r- '.I,i' l History/Architecture Inventory PROPERTY NAME ADDRESS Twp Range Sec Quarters USGS Report NRHP CEF DOE Inventory Number COUNTY: Scott CITY/TOWNSHIP: Jackson Twp. fllnnstead off Co. Hwy. 15 115 23 13 SW-SW-SW Shakopee SC.79-lH SC-JAC-005 .J Tuesday, August 03, 2004 Page 1 of 1 ~ Prime Agriculture Soils Map N +. Coutryside EA W 0 500 1,000 2,0~~et W E WSB SHAKO PEE Cit of Shako ee, MN s -:=: