Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.A. Park Naming Policy . --:-, '-t.~. . CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum To: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board From: Andrea Weber, Parks and Recreation Landscape Design Subject: Park Naming Policy Date: September 27,2004 INTRODUCTION The current Park Naming Policy dates from approximately 1983. There are several parks which have been recently developed and several more which are proposed for the next year which do not yet have official names. Names also are needed in order to plan a park signage prototype which will be used as a new city. standard. This is a good opportunity to review how names have been given to city parks in the past, to view other organizations policies on naming, and to discuss amending the current policy to reflect current views and standards which are commonly used and how they can achieve greater goals of the community by reinforcing a sense of place. BACKGROUND The current Park Naming Policy gives the Park and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) sole discretion onthe naming of parks and may do so however it chooses. Names are then approved by th City Council..Names designated while this policy has been in effect are not typically well documented as to how the process was done. Preference is stated in a policy memo from 1983 for names commemorating individuals with historic influence on the city's history, another document stated a preference for Native American words or names. There are not many other stated guidelines. In addition, there is little provision for community input or preference for names shown to have community support. see attachment 1. A non-comprehensive search on the internet provided a few other examples of naming policies, which will be summarized below. Two are from other cities in the U.S., Seattle W A, and Arlington, TX and one is a federal naming policy, from the USGS. Contact with other local cities has also produced information, including a policy from the city of New Hope and one from the Ramsey County Commissioners, see attachments 2, 3. A discussion of the out of state resources follows below. Arlington Texas has a Park Board Naming Policy divided into four sections: Purpose, Process, Guidelines, and Procedure. It is a short and straightforward policy. It is based on an application process for initiating a name, new or changed. Park staff reviews the application and a committee of the Park Board reviews the application and makes a recommendation to the Park Board. The park board has a month to consider the application, and then presents a recommendation (or no recommendation) to the City . .. . Council. Guidelines include: adjacent street names, Physical Features, Subdivision Names, Historic Features or Events, or individuals or groups who have made significant contributions to the City, excluding current elected officers and board members. The application requests information on the reasons for the naming, evidence of community support and petitions as part of the process. The City Council ultimately makes the decision on the name request. Seattle Washin2:ton's policy is overseen by two people (or their designees): the Chair of the Park Board and the Chair of the City Operations Committee, who together constitute the Naming Board. The Naming Board has the authority to establish criteria for naming as well. Their policy is also broken down into four parts: Procedure, Criteria, Process, and Guidelines. Procedure is to solicit names from outside sources-media, organizations, etc., make a recommendation and justify the choice, then the superintendent makes the final decision. Criteria include: due care and consideration, avoidance of similarities to existing names, appropriateness, geographic or historic or cultural significance. Names commemorating people may be made with the conditions that the person be deceased a minimum of two years, and that the person made a significant contribution to Parks and Recreation There is a statement that timing of a naming action is important, as 'temporary names tend to become permanent, therefore they use a numeric designation for all new parks. until a final name is chosen. The process is by application. Applicants receive copies of naming guidelines. Applications are then reviewed by staff and put on the Park Board Agenda, where the Board will then have 1 month to consider the name before voting on it. Naming guidelines include adjacent streets, geographic features, subdivision names, significant historic feature or event, or individuals or groups who have made exceptional contributions which may include: donating significant amounts for park development or acquisition, providing direct & significant volunteer service benefiting the public. Persons holding elected office or Board Members may not be considered. The United States Geolo2:ic Service (USGS) is in charge of mapping for the Federal Government. Their policy is a very thorough standard used for naming geologic features on government maps. They do not hold authority on local naming procedures, but are an example of a longstanding legal policy. The following is a very brief summary. Their policy is also an application initiated one. The application requires information on the name, location (scaled to a standard USGS scale) drawing, origin of name, reason for naming, and documentation that the feature is not named. If the proposed name is commemorative, the person's full name, birth and death dates, and a short biography must be submitted. A person considered must also have been deceased at least 5 years, and have had a direct, long term association with the feature or be a national or international person without a direct association to the feature. It is also noted in the policy that, "Experience shows that local citizens and other name users often resent and even resist using names that commemorate people." [This may be an attitude more applicable to a Federal naming issue than a local one, but it bears consideration.] A review may be expedited if additional documentation of local support is provided. This may include letters from other levels of government administration, petitions signed by local residents, and newspaper articles and/or letters to the editor. Other guidelines discuss uniqueness and appropriateness of names as well as standardizing spelling and grammar of names. There are codes specifying preference for existing local usage historic usage and common usage. Legal usages also have precedent. When proposing to use Native American names, whether they are common names, person's names or names taken from meanings in Native languages, it is important that the local tribe be consulted. The overall policy aim is to ensure that there is one name for one feature, and that the name is going to have local support for the purpose of accuracy, clarity and consistency for map documents. In summary, the above three Naming Policies have several similarities: . First, there is a defined application process, which ensures documentation of all naming proposals. . Second, there is a procedure for review to ensure all applications are officially recognized. -< Third, there are guidelines on what types of names may be considered, and - Fourth, there are clear opportunities for public input and involvement, so that those who will ultimately use the name can 'take ownership' of the place which is named. These opportunities are important in giving citizens and residents ties to their communities, they help create citizens who feel more invested in their community and hopefully have more satisfaction in knowing that they have a say. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Park and Recreation Advisory Board propose a formal Park Naming Policy to the City Council. The benefit of having a policy would be to have a clearly defined, open process for making the important decision on what to name new parks. The following are a series of four steps to develop: Purpose for a naming Policy, an Application Form, Naming Guidelines, and Review Procedure. DRAFT POLICY 1. The Purpose of the naming policy is threefold: A. Unique. Uniqueness indicates that names be identifiable to a specific place and not duplicate.or become confused with existing names in City of Shako pee as well as neighboring areas. This includes names for developed parks of all classifications as well as open spaces and natural areas. Trails may be named uniquely if they make connections between more than one public place, as well as if they are on land which is not only adjacent to city streets. B. Meaningful. Names which are meaningful will help to strengthen community identity and reinforce a sense of place. They may have meanings associated with site natural or constructed features as well as local historic events which strengthen the identity ofthe City of Shakopee as a whole. C. Inclusive. Names which are inclusive have been adopted through a process which allows for public input and review. They are also respectful of all people and cultures and reflect positive vallles acceptable to the community as a whole. . " 2. Naming Request Form for a naming a new, improved or existing unnamed park should include the following: A. Location of Park to be named (development, neighborhood and adjacent street frontage( s)). B. Person/organization requesting the name and their contact information. C. Proposed name and list oftwo alternates D. Explanation of name meanings, including translation, if applicable, and the reason for its choice. E. Description of process involved in choosing the proposed name which may be from one of the following: . a neighborhood meeting, including how the meeting was advertised and the names of attendees . a naming contest procedure and its results . a developers proposal in which the proposed parkland is located . a Director of Park and Recreation recommendation 2. Naming Guidelines for all Naming Request Applicants. The following guidelines are presented in order of descending preference: a. General guidelines. . Names should not duplicate existing park names, nor shall they be similar enough to be confused with existing parks, public or private places. . They should not be longer than four words, with two words preferred. . They should not use numbers, or use adjectives such as east, west, big, long, etc., whenever possible, unless an adjacent feature uses the same descriptor [this guideline is to encourage more specific, unique names rather than generic ones]. . The last word(s) of the name shall be an appropriate designator of the type of park, i. e. Neighborhood Park or Mini Park. [this may require modification to existing park names-i. e. Lions Community Park) b. Names recognizing specific site features, local geographic features, wildlife and other natural themes are encouraged when appropriate to the site. c. Names recognizing historic places, events and cultural ideas as well as names using Dakota language or concepts shall be appropriate to the site and proposed use, and should follow standard current spelling ofthe Dakota language. d. Names to commemorate persons who have made significant contributions to Shako pee parks, trails, and open spaces may be considered only if the person has been deceased for at least one year and with the permission of remaining immediate family members or designated representative, if any. Names to commemorate other local born or raised persons of national importance may also be. considered with the same conditions as above. f. Naming Rights are discussed separately in the Donor Naming Policy. . '. 3. Standard Review Procedure. Applications shall be submitted to the Park and Recreation Director, and reviewed for completeness and accuracy. The applicant shall be informed of the date at which the Naming Request will be heard at a subsequent PRAB meeting. Park staff shall make a recommendation ofthe Naming Request to the PRAB. The PRAB shall discuss the Naming Request and approve or deny the Application. They may also table the request until the next regular meeting date before voting on it. If the PRAB approves it, the Naming Request shall move forward for final acceptance by the City Council. If it has been denied, the applicant may request that the Application be reviewed by the City Council. The City Council will hear and vote on the PRAB recommendation. The City Council shall have final authority on all Park Naming Requests. There is no designated route for appeals of Naming Request Applications decisions by the City Council other than to submit a new application at a later date. When a naming request is made as a part of the development process, a developer may submit the Naming Request Application with an exemption as stated in 2.E. above. If there is more than one park site within a single development, they shall temporarily be designated by development name and letter, Le. "Highview Park A" until the naming process has been completed. The Park and Recreation Director may alternately submit the complete Naming Request Application him or herself for an undeveloped park, only after a preliminary plat approval has been given by the City Council showing a defined park area to be granted to the city, for which the developer has not made a Naming Request. A Naming Request Approval shall only take effect after the land has officially been transferred to the city's ownership and the city retains legal title to the land. DISCUSSION 1. Decide whether the current Park Naming Policy still produces desired community outcomes regarding the dedication of new park names and whether it shall be retained. 2. Decide whether the Recommended Naming Policy should be revised or endorsed as is and sent to other departments for review. 3. Discuss how to begin the naming process for existing parks which have no official names-Leo Southbridge Park #11, Whispering Oaks Park and Trail, and others. . ATTACHMENT 1 - MEMO TO~ Members of the Park and Recreation Advisory Board FROM~ Mark McQuillan SUBJECT: Park Naming Considerations DATE~ February, 14, 1992 INTRODUCTION When a new city park, trail or special recreation facility is added to the park system, the Park and Recreation Advisory Board may recommend a name to the City Council. To make the process work faster, the Park and Recreation Advisory Board should establish some simple guidelines to follow when deciding on a facility name. BACKGROUND The City of Shako pee currently has no policies or guidelines regulating the naming of city parks. In fact, staff has checked with several other communities and found that they too, have no such guidelines. Perhaps naming parks is not an issue in most communities. In most cases, streets are named by the developer of a particular subdivision. However, there will be occasions when the community wishes to honor a certain individual who has made significant contributions to the community by naming a street or park after that person. Many of Shakopee's streets and parks were named after certain individuals who lived here and were very active in the community. For example, Huber Park was named after Edward J. Huber, a former president of First National Bank. Mr. Huber was very active with the local scouting programs and various community functions. There are two major considerations to be addressed before the P.R. A.B. begins naming park facilities: when is it appropriate and when is it not appropriate to take action? In many instances, the Board Alay find itself just -rubber stamping- a name given to a park by the developer who has dedicated the land. When i. it appropriate tor the P.R.A.B. to na.. park.? . When the park land is purchased by the City using funds from either the park reserve fund, bonds, and/or grants. . When park property abuts or traverses through several different subdivisions. However, if the park land was dedicated by just one developer, they should be allowed to name the park, if they so choose. * When property is donated or bequeathed to the City for park purposes. . When an existing park is to be renamed in honor of a particular individual, organization or event. * When a developer who 1s dedicating park land requests the City to name the park. Wh.n i. it not appropriate tor the P.R.A.B. to nalll. park.? * When the City does not have complete or partial title to the property. * When the public property is owned by another governmental agency. * When the name of existing park has a historical value and tradition associated with it. . When developers dedicate land for a park, they generally want the park to assume the same name as the subdivision. For example, .if the housing development is called Canterbury Estates, the park will most likely be called Canterbury Park. 1 . CONSIDERATIONS FOR NAKING PARKS When it is appropiate for the Park and Recreation Advisory Board to name parks, they should take into consideration the following questions: 1- How was the park acquired? -Were City funds used? (Park Reserves, Capital Funds, bonds) -Was the land acquired through park dedication? -Was it donated or bequeathed to the City? -Did the city receive the property through tax-forfeiture? -Is the property being leased from public or private organizations? 2. Where is the park geographically located? -Is it in a residential subdivision, business district, industrial. park or rural area? -Is it near woods, hills, Ilountains, schools, rivers, lakes, celletery or airport? 3. Are there any significant features within the park boundaries that .ay easily lend itself to a certain name? -What is the topography like? -Is there a pond, a lake, a marsh or prairie grass in, around or near the park? -What kind of plant life exist in or near-by park? -What kind of air-flow is there through the park? -What kinds of wildlife exist? -What are the known geologic features? -Is there a lot of open space? -Is there any historical value to the land? ego A former Native American village, early settlers, farM, city dump, brewery, famous dignitary lived or visited there etc. 4. What types of usage is planned for the park facility? -Will it be used as a youth or adult sports complex? -Is it geared for passive use such as picnics, biking or nature hikes? -If there is lake shore property, will it be used for swimming, boat launching, sailing or ice skating in the winter? -Will it be turned into a golf course, theme park or downhill skiing? 2 . PARK NAMING GUIDELINES A. The Shakopee Park and Recreation Advisory Board should not take action naming parks when: 1. The City does not have cOMplete or partial title to the property. 2. The public property is owned by another governmental agency. 3. The naMe of existing park has a historical value and tradition associated with it. B. The Shakopee Parks and Recreation Advisory Board should take action naming parks when: 1. The park land is purchased by the City using funds from either the park reserve funds, bonds, grants or a combination of several. 2. Park property abuts or traverses through several different subdivisions. Hoyever, if the park land yas dedicated by just one developer, they should be allowed to name the park, if they so choose. 3. Property is donated or bequeathed to the City for park purposes. 4. An existing park is to be renamed in honor of a particular individual, organization or event. 5. A developer who is dedicating park land requests the City to name the park. . . Memo to: Members of the Park and Recreation Advisory Board From: Mark McQuillan, Recreation Supervisor Subject: Renaming of two parks Date: April 17, 1992 Introduction The Park and Recreation Advisory Board appointed a sub-committee at its March meeting to meet with the old Eastside (lEl) Park Steering Committee to come up with a new name for that park and the newly constructed tot-lot on the corner of Emerald Lane and Diamond Court. Background On April 16, 1992, the sub-committee of Paulette Rislund, Ann Seifert, Mark McQuillan (staff) and Sherry Dvorak (staff) met with Jim Cook of the Eastside Park Steering Committee to decide what to name the new parks. Bob Tomczik, a member of the sub- committee, was not able to attend because of a prior commitment. Several names were suggested for each respective park site. They were as follows: STAFF SUGGESTIONS FOR NAMING OF PARKS EASTSIDE PARK: HAUER'S EDITION TOTLOT: .FRIENDSHIP PARK -DIAMOND PLAYGROUND dEWEL PARK *EMERALD PLAYGROUND -DRAINAGE DITCH PARK -VALLEY VIEW PLAYGROUND -UPPER VALLEY PARK -HAUER'S TOT LOT -VALLEY PARK *KID'S PLAYLOT .SHAKOPEE PARK .GEMSTONES PLAYGROUND -HIGHLAND PARK -RUBY PARK The committee narrowed each list down to two or three most preferable choices. From there, the committee choseathese names: 1. Old New Eastside (JEJ) Park Scenic Heights Park Rationale Scenic Heights vas chosen because the area, when it was first platted, was refered to as Scenie. Heights. In fact, many af the residents living in the vac1n1ty o~ Easts1de Park have their property tax statements referring that area as Scenic Heights. 2. Old New Hauer's Edition Totlot Emerald Lane Totlot Rationale The totlot is located on the corner of Emerald Land and Diamond Court. Between the two, Emerald Lane is the more traveled street and it serves as a good reference point for directions to the park. Alternatives 1. Accept the sub-committee's recommendation 2. Choose a different name. 3. Do nothing Recommendation . Alternative #1 - Accept the sub-committee's recommendation Action Requested Move to recommend to the City Council to rename Eastside (JEJ) Park to Scenic Heights Park and change the name of Hauer's Edition Totlot to Emerald Lane Totlot. . . g.,llukopcc ([OllHlluuitU ~CrUi(C5 129 Levee Drive Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone 445-2742 Community Education · Parks · Recreation · Adult Education April 28, 1983 Memo To: John K. Anderson, City Administrator From : George F. Muenchow Subject: Procedure For Naming Shakopee Parks Date : April 28, 1983 Introduction The Shakopee City Council at its April 19, 1983 Meeting expressed its desire and intent to develop a policy for naming parks in Shakopee. The Council furthermore indicated a preference for names of people with early origins both Indian and Pioneer. Staff is to respond. Background There seems to be two reasonable alternatives for naming parks in this community. l. City Council initiative. 2. Involve the community in this decision by mean~__of a Park Naming Contest. This latter method can be used if the Council declines to name a park by its own determinatiori. Either way the Council should be the final authority in this matter. Recommendation The City Council shall first determine if it wishes to name a park upon its own initiative. If it declines to do this it shall then request the Shakopee Community Services Board to conduct a Park Naming Contest. This contes~ shall be of an impartial nature and shall be restricted to names of early origins, either Indian or Pioneer. Action Move to institute a Procedure For Naming Shakopee Parks with the City Council having first opportunity to do this. If it so declines it shall request the Shakopee Community Services Board to conduct an impartial contest in the community only considering names of early origins, either Indian or Pioneer. A COOPERATIVE EFFORT OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE AND SCHOOL DISTRICT 720 SINCE 1954 . 09/21/2004 10:44 5514502490 PARK @ REC PAGE 02 ~1:.1-'-lb-.o::l!Jl!J4 104.'::;( U::'H1A1.II:' L,.Jr 1"11'1 \,., 1.1 ! C;~ . -.. .. - -... - - .._" . ---. -- . ATTACHMENT 2 "/~ NAMING OF PARKS AND FACILITIES City of New Hope June 2002 '.0 POLlCV These eriterion will be used as general guldellnes when naming or renaming parks. park trails. recreational facilitie$. and oity fllcmties. 2.0 , Q8G~N]ZATIQNt::l A~r;CT!;D: Community-wide. 3.0 PROCEDURE: S., The naming of city parks and city facilities will be given consideration. by the City Council based o,,~ . Geographic l.ocation ~ a name representatiVe of neighborhood. street. subdivision, natural habitat, outstanding feature, neatby landmark, or other characteristics of the site. . Contributor _ an individuill or organi%ation who has donated Ia.nd or made a slgnlfloant financial contribution (50% or greater) towards a park or facility. . Famous American or Occasion - state or federal leaders or a historical event. 3.2 ConsIstent with the CouncIl recommendation In 19S!S, recognitIon of an individual, business, or organization can be made in the form of a memorial (i.e. trees. park banch, flag pole. plaque, or art ollject displayed on city property). The donor Is responsible for the cost of the objeot, installation, and .any Do-going maintenance costs. Plaqu'9s shall not Bxoaed 22S square Inches. other memorials ~iIl also be limited in size dependent upon the item and location. 3.3 Renaming of a city park will only be con$idered if the neighborhood changes in natura either by composition of residants or the compositIon of the surrounding area. 3.4 The City Council has authority tD make exceptions to the policy, .._ - - - - _. _01 - - ,- .- -"- - - ---.- ... 7811 t:... tf Fait # 1:/At!/fninia1MElnIN~rolngl!!'li1c::I;(lliIlil.q~ oMl7fi!DOD TOTAL P.01 . - f ATTACHMENT :3 , Reso~uti'on ' Board of Ramsey County Commissioners Presented By Commissioner Reinhardt Date October 20, 1998 No. 98-417 Attention: d' dt . Bu getlng an Accoun lng P 1 f 3 b 1 . l' age 0 Monte Ollen urger, Po lCY & P annlng Jolly Mangine, Property Management Greg Mack, Parks and Recreation WHEREAS, In the near future, Ramsey County will be constructing or reconstructing several buildings or facilities; and WHEREAS, Ramsey County currently has no policy on naming County facilities; Now, Therefore, Be It RESOLVED, That the Board of Ramsey County Commissioners adopts the following Policy on Naming Facilities to ensure an orderly and consistent process that seeks citizen input, and to clarify responsibility for naming: POLICY ON NAMING FACILITIES I. Ramsey County facilities, including buildings, parks, and open space generally shall be named or renamed according to the geographical or natural features in which the site is located. The, name should include a reference to the kind of public service being" provided at the facility. A. The County may consider naming facilities after i nd i v idu a 1 s., _ , bu t'jP);};l;~{,$1c.:i'~1~~""J~'a':S~!lli~~~~~fil;;;::~:t~~~?:;;ififi...dfiiV:d~_ttuaitrL~ ha'~' d' _.. ;;v-..."",.,-~". '1":~+;"""' ' '<<"'o4\'"t'''''P.,' "A""'-tl;\ '~''''1k.;'...'~,''''' 'J! '-""";~" ~'","...w;.."'='-1r;-~......' \, ma _e'ii'~'r:iU~,'t:',.e,-^, e:e'yc J:.:OH'a~X~" C\;/n:'t::.:l?~1:J1.1'0:F',EH1!illi'-:, d:t:~".'_'l:liu="'.::e4..,,==V':i3::!ii::e;;'J..'Ufg;i'P1l!!! 'iB;~g,~~~@l}d~,;wwJJ~~~;~,_blH~l?$i,.q.Q,I,ftt..:Ltj;,i;.)u-w;kQP~jzA;;'iii.~~'!i~~~l51*",€1,"~nl1~",'Gi~ ~;:;;:td::re~{;hel'le,f,..i;;:t!t:t::O,t'~~'i!'ser&'1h-n1:!':i!}:tillg-:t1"1;:till.etT'1ima-rz.;i:llh~i:S:~~iid:t~ . B. It is strongly recommended that Ramsey County parks be named after geographical or natural features in which the site is located. This is to ensure easy identification of the park location by citizens. Buildings contained within the parks may be named after individuals using the same criteria noted in A. above. C. An existing facility that is reconstructed will retain its original name unless there is a proposal to rename the facility. AMSEY COUNTI' BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS YEA NAY OlliER ony Bennett _ _ Susan Haigh. Chair ino Guerin _ ~ Jet' ' h _ _ (Continued) afal.. .1ega _ _ By___ ___ ictoria Reinhardt _ _ Bonnie C. Jackelen nice Rettman _ _ Chief Clerk - County Board n Wiessner _ _ . I;'. ... II... t ~ . Resolution ' Board of Ramsey County Commissioners Presented By Commissioner Reinhardt Date October 20, 1998 No. 98-417 Attention: Budgeting and Accounting Monte Ollenburger, Policy & Planning Page 3 of 3 Jolly Mangine, Property Management Greg Mack, Parks and Recreation The commission, board, advisory board, or CIPAC may recommend (1) accepting the proposed name, (2) not accepting the proposed name, or (3) conducting a broader citizen participation process. The recommendation shall be submitted, along with justification, to the commissioner in whose district the facility is located for review and comment. The recommendations of the commissioner and the commission, board, or .advisory board will be forwarded (by the department whose services will be provided in the proposed facility) to the County Board for consideration. III. Changing the Name of an Existing Facility A. When citizens, elected officials, or public administrators recommend that an existing facility be renamed, they shall submit a request and justification to the appropriate commission, board, or advisory board directly connected to the department whose services are being provided in the facility, or the CIPAC. The commission, board, advisory board, or CIPAC may recommend (1) accepting the proposed name, (2) not accepting the proposed name, or (3) conducting a broader citizen participation process. The P-lllffi'IID.nenrm,trill..:On~I;.8is:ha'Ji'ltl o~~~!t\{s.tu:bmm7t:t!:~:cm-j;:'l('i~i:;;a{J::D'ngj;rY,'k'l\i.w,'Jbt? tt8~';")"~"9..u:;S:t!lf'flI':(ia1!:;;l:t5rrrj@'ff;g;-1f(jK0Q~i5:~he' Q~~,jg:;;$~.j::j;[~;1-'i",;!.~n'i;;:YBIe~s:..8j'0Q..it~t~E&-,(]ij:;J;:;;:.tha1!:;;fro:c:djT~~t:j0i;:i~f.;:,:1:JJ:e:.~t"e~o]gt. ~e.M);'~~8~,;<,~~,PAWl~n}~ . Th~ recommendations. of the commlSSloner and the commlSSlon, board, or advlsory board will be forwarded (by the department whose services will be provided in the proposed facility) to the County Board for consideration. RAMSEY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS YEA NAY OTHER Tony Bennett _ _ Absent Dip" Guerin X ~ Sl ligh -----x- _ I :I; ?/. . Rafael Ortega X _ __ B .' ~4.1-9c~~:-- Victoria Reinhardt ~ _ Bonnie C. Jac!,:clen Janice Retunan _ -L ChiefCler /Co ty Board Jan Wiessner ~ _