The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About15.C.4. ISD #720 Environmental Assessment Worksheet IOIC,Y. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum COi~SENT CASE NO.: 04-074 TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R, Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: ISD 720 Environmental Assessment Worksheet MEETING DATE: October 5, 2004 INTRODUCTION: ISD 720 has previously requested the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W) for the new high school site. The site is located south of Highway 169 and east of County Road 79. WSB and Associates, on behalf of the City, has completed the preparation of the EA W. Staff is now requesting that the City Council approve the distribution of the EA W to agencies for review and comment. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to approve the distribution ofthe ISD 720 EA W. 44;~~~-6 R. Michael Leek Community Development Director Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor, City of Shakopee City Council, City of Shakopee From: Ryan Hilghes, WSB & Associates, Inc. t Date: September 30, 2004 .. .. New Shako pee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet WSB Project No. 1281-71 Attached, please fmd a draft copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W) for the New Shakopee High School for your review. The purpose ofthe EA W is to identify potential environmental impacts associated with the project and determine whether or not an Environmental Impact Statement is needed. Based on Minnesota Rules 4410.4300; the EA W for this project is(mandatory due to the gross floor space of the institutional facility. The EAW process is required to be completed prior to the City issuing any approvals for this proj ect. The attached EA W evaluates the "full build" scenario forthe New High School and possible expansion and identifies potential environmental impacts and mitigation measures for these impaCts. The full build scenario is evaluated as part of the EA W since impacts can generally be reduced by reducing the gross floor space, but if the gross floor space increases beyond what was evaluated in theEAW, a new EA W must be completed. The EA W is being submitted to the City Council for authorization for public distribution of the EAW as required by Minnesota Rilles 4410. Upon authorization by the City Council, the EA W will be distributed for a 30-daypublic comment period. At the end of the comment period, responses to comments will be developed and a recommendation as to the need for an Environmental Impact Statement will be made to the City Council for consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to call one of us at (763)541-4800. c. Michael Leek, City of Shakopee Development Director (no attachment) John McBroom, Shakopee Independent School District #720 (no attachment) David Braslau, David Braslau Associates (no attachment) Don Sterna, WSB & Associates, Inc. (no attachment) Andi Moffatt, WSB & Associates,.Inc. (no attachment) F:\ WPWIN\1281- 71 \090204citycounci1.doc Minneapolis. st. Cloud. Equal Opportunity Employer I I I I I ....., New SbakopeeHigb School RGU: SHAKOPEE EQB Publication Date: October 11, 2004 City of Shakopee EAW Comment Deadline: November 10, 2004 Michael Leek 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 ~ WSB & Associates, Inc. WSB Project No. 1281-71 . - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Note to preparers: This form is available at www.mnplan.state.mn.us. EAW Guidelines will be available. in Spring 1999 at the web site. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EA W is prepared by the Responsible Governmental Unit or its agents to determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared. The project proposer must supply any reasonably accessible data for - but should not complete - the final worksheet. If a complete answer does not fit in the space allotted, attach additional sheets as necessary. The complete question as well as the answer must be included if the EA W is prepared electronically. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an E~~. Tables, Figures, and Appendices attached to the EAW: . County map showing the general location ofthe project; . United States Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1 :24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy acceptable); . Site plan showing all significant project and natural features. These items are attached in Appendix A and B. TDD (for hearing and speech impaired only): (651) 282-5332 Printed on recycled paper containing 30%fibersfrom paper recycled by consumers Il - The City of Shakopee has prepared anEA W for the site of a new high school in Independent School District #720. This project includes the construction of a 310,000 square foot building as well as parking, athletic fields, storm water ponds, and providing open space for possible future expansion on . approximately 88 acres. The proposed site was purchased with funding approved by a referendum in 1997. The School District purchased the land for the proposed high school site in preparation for future population growth within Independent School District #720. The land has continued to be cultivated for agricultural purposes since that time. The proposed high school campus will consist of a new high school building, parking space for students, staff, and visitors, athletic and recreational facilities, and-storm water ponds. The. building will be three stories in height and occupy a foot print of approximately 189,000 square feet. This approximately 310,000 square foot building is anticipated to accommodate 1,600 students and 125 staff. In addition to teaching and laboratory classrooms, offices, and support space, the building will include a gymnasium and an 800-seat auditorium. The auditorium will support school as well as extracurricular functions for students and community functions for the public. The site will provide approximately 1000 parking spaces to serve students, visitors, and staff. The site will also provide parking for approximately 24 buses. As part of the residential development being constructed north ofthe high school campus, the inplace 17th A venue will extend west approximately 1 mile from County Road 79 across to County Road 15. The right-of-way required for the extension of 17th A venue will be deeded to the City of Shakopee. This road will provide three access points along the north edge of the proposed high school campus. Access to the proposed high school campus will occur along the western and eastern edges ofthe site, respectively. Student, visitor, staff, and bus parking will be located on the northern half of the site and will primarily be accessed from the .17th A venue extension. On site circulation drives will allow all traffic to circulate throughout the different parking ar,eas without leaving the site. The Concept Plan for the school is included in Appendix B. Given the proximity of the proposed high school campus to the existingShakopee High School, the School District plans to continue to use their existing outdoor Varsity athletic facilities. No playing fields are being designed for night lighting as part of this project. Athletic playing fields anticipated on the site include baseball, softball, soccer, and football. Also, tennis courts are anticipated to be created as part of the athletic features. Storm water retention/infiltration basins will be constructed to collect runoff from the new impervious surfaces for the building and parking areas to limit storm water flow from the campus. The City of Shakopee will require storm water to be treated to NURP standards. Discharge restrictions will follow the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. Construction methods of the proposed school building and related facilities are anticipated to include: New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee, Minnesota 2 . . Excavation! grading of soils for preparation of playing fields, pavement and building pad areas. - . Excavation for the installation of utilities and drainage features. . Excavation required for retention/infiltration basins. . The grading concept is intended to balance cut and fill to limit importing and exporting of soil material. . Grading required for the constructionoft~e 17th Avenue extension by Tollefson. . Paving of roadways, walks, and parking. . Poured concrete footings with block foundations. . Building construction, including the following components: Concrete block, brick, precast concrete, steel framing, and gypsum board. ,. Construction of the new high school campus is planned to begin in the spring of 2005 and be open for occupancy in the fall of2007. The project will involve the construction of a new high school with associated athletic and recreational fields to accommodate an increasing enrollment as the population within the District continues to grow. The new high school will accommodate 10th through 12th grade students when it opens in 2007. The facility is being designed to accommodate alternate grade configurations to allow the District flexibility for future needs. Flexibility to accommodate future growth in the School District is being considered in development of both the site plan and the building. A possible expansion of the building to accommodate anywhere from 200 to 800 or more additional students from 10th grade through 12th grade (or possibly 9th grade through 12th grade) is a potential in the future, and would include construction of expanded parking areas. In addition, acreage in the northellst comer of the site is being left to allow for flexible development for future growth at the present time. In the event that the. School District opts not to expand the high school facilities to accommodate an increased population, the potential exists that a possible elementary school could be constructed on the undeveloped portion of the site. However, neither of these improvements are phased as part of this project, firmly planned for the future, or are the environmental impacts of future expansions addressed in this EA W. Not Applicable New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee, Minnesota 3 ~ - The school will be bordered on the north, west, and east sides by residential homes. These areas are guided to be low to medium density residential homes. Currently, the project site is bordered on the south by low density residential development. The residential homes in this area range from two to three stories. The height of the school is anticipated to be mitigated by open space, ponds, and landscape architecture to be completed as part of the design. Unit of Government T lication Status Wetland Permit To be obtained, if needed State MPCA NPDES storm water ermit To be obtained MPCA Sanita Sewer Extension Pennit To be obtained Minnesota DNR Water A ro riation To be obtained, if needed Minnesota De artment of Health Water Main Extension Permit To be obtained Access Permit To be obtained Plattin To be com leted Buildin Permits To be obtained Site Plan Review To be com leted WCA Permit To be obtained, if needed Gradin Permit To be obtained New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee, Minnesota 4 w It is not the objective of the EA W preparation to develop all the detailed information required for . construction permits. The project proposer will assemble the required information and apply for these . permits when apprqpriate. Recent past land use in the project area is primarily agricultural. According to the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) summary for northern Scott County land cover for the area within the project site is designated as planted or cultivated vegetation. One residential single family home is located within the project site. The residential homestead accessible from CountY Road 79 includes a farmhouse, two barn/stables, and a garage. According to the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the new Shakopee high school completed April 9, 2004 no evidence of environmental hazards, as defined by ASTM, are present on this site. The review completed for the Phase I ESA did not indicate the presence of above ground storage tanks, unregulated waste dumping, or other activities with potential for environmental concern on the project site. If environmental hazards are encountered during grading, they will be dealt with according to state regulations. The City of Shakopee Comprehensive Plan (Updates 1999 and January 2004) City-Wide Land Use Plan has guided the project site as Public/Semi-Public. Within the Comprehensive Plan Update the amount and pace of future urban growth in this area is reliant on the regional sanitary sewer and the allocation of Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) from the Metropolitan Council. Most of Shakopee has been placed in the region's illustrative 2020 MUSA according to Metropolitan Council's Regional Blueprint. In this respect, expanded urban growth within Shakopee is consistent with regional policy. The areas are estimates and may change during the plan review process. Estimate includes approximately 4 acres of impervious surface for future expansion. The current land use on the project site is agricultural. The majority of the property is used for production of row crops; in 2004 wheat was grown. A small portion of the land is used for forag~ production. New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee,~Urrnesota 5 " The farmstead consisting of a house, barn, outbuildings, and livestock lots is located in the eastern - half of the parcel. . Vegetation on the farmstead is primarily planted and consists of lawn grasses, apple trees (Malus sylvestris), shrubs such as lilac (Syringa vulgaris) and Amur maple (Acer ginnala) and scattered mature trees including cottonwood (Populus deltoides), ash (Fraxinus spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.). The drainage ditch and field edges are predominately vegetated with grasses and forbs. Vegetation in these areas consists of species such as smooth brome (Bromus inermis),. quackgrass (Elytrigia repens), yellow foxtail (Setaria glauca), red clover (Trifolium pratense), alfalfa (Medicago sativa), curly dock (Rumex crispus), common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), horseweed (Conyza canadensis), common burdock (Arctium minus), and bull and Canada thistles (Cirsium vulgare and C. arvense). A small area of forest is found on the property. This forest is located on a steep hillside in the southeast comer of the site. The forest shows evidence of past disturbance because dominant trees are early successional species such as boX: elder (Acer negundo) and silver maple (Acer saccharinum) as well as basswood (Tilia americana) and green ash (Fraxinuspennsylvanica). Buckthorn (Rhamnus carthartica) is a common understory species that also indicates a disturbed forest ecosystem. Because of the thick forest canopy, understory vegetation is sparse and consists of native species such as red elder (Sambucus racemosa), moonseed (Menispermum canadense), Virginia waterleaf(Hydrophyllum virginianum), white snakeroot (Eupatorium rugosum), enchanter's nightshade (Circaea lutetiana), stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) and bedstraw (Galium spp.). A review of the Minnesota County Biological Survey was completed for the project site. No high quality natural areas or rare or threatened species were indicated within the project site. The wildlife habitat value of the property is limited. Relatively few wildlife species utilize cropland for habitat. The farmstead, drainage ditch, forage areas and cropland may provide foraging habitat for raptors, songbirds, small mammals, and snakes. However, none of these animals exclusively use cropland for habitat. The forest may provide habitat for wildlife species thadive in forest fragments and edges in agricultural areas. This includes mammals such as white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), eastern chipmunk (Tamius striatus), raccoon (Procyon lotor), gray squirrel (Sciurius carolinensis), cottontail rabbit (Sylvilagusfloridanus), woodchuck (Marmota monax), and red fox (Vulpesfulva). Bird species include American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), downy woodpecker (Dendrocopos pubescens), blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata), black-capped chickadee (Par us atricapillus), white breasted nuthatch (Sitta carolinensis), house wren (Troglodytes aedon), gray catbird (Dumetella carolinensis), brown thrasher (Toxostoma rufum),cedar waxwing (Bombycilla cedrorum), warbling vireo (Vireo gilvus), red-eyed vireo (Vireo olivaceous), northern cardinal (Richmondena cardinalis), indigo bunting (Passerina cyanea), chipping sparrow (Spizella passerina), white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicoWs) and American goldfinch (Spinus tristis). Reptiles and amphibians occurring in this area likely include garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis), ring-neck snake (Diadophispunctatus), and gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor). _ The surrounding land is primarily agricultural and residential. The forest on the southeast edge of the property is contiguous with additional forest off the property on a steep hillside. A siniilar forest is found southeast of the project area across Townline Avenue. The majority of the area on the project property is cultivated and a farmstead. A large drainage ditch intersects the property, and a small area of mixed hardwood forest is found on a steep slope in the southeast comer of the property . New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee,~ll1nesota 6 ..: . The proposed high school development will convert the agricultural and farmstead areas ta buildings, parking lots, athletic fields, and storm water pands. Any wildlife habitat value that currently exists will be permaneutly lost. The hardwood forest to the south is avoided by the. praposed praject and will retain value as habitat. Given the law value of the praperty as wildlife habitat, minimal impacts an fish and wildlife resaurces will result. Based an the DNR Natural Heritage Database and site visit, there are no known endangered or rare species an .or near the site. The letter from the DNR is included in Appendix D. The site does not contain -any water bodies mapped an the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) or the Department of Natural Resources Public Waters Inventory (PWI). An asSessment .of wetlands an the site perf armed fall, 2003 and summer, 2004 by Peterson Enviranmental Consulting, Inc. found no wetlands an the site and indicated that the ditch was created in upland soils, lacked wetland character, and was therefore notjurisdictianal. The U.S. Army Carps .of Engineers reviewed the wetland delineation completed far the site and has deterinined that no work will be done in a navigable water .of the United States, and na dredged .or fill material, including that incidental to mechanical land clearing, will be discharged in any water .of the United States, including wetlands. The U.S. Army Carps of Engineers letter and Peterson Enviroiunental correspandence is included in Appendix E. , ~ Accarding to the Phase 1 Enviranmental Site Assessments campleted far the praject area by STS Cansultants one private residential water supply well is located within the site. No informatian regarding the statu~ of this well was included in the report. All wells found within the project site should be sealed in canformance with Minnesata State Rules 7080 prior ta site develapment. New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee,~ll1nesota 7 '" Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (SPUC) municipal water system currently consists of municipal . wells that serve the City's urban water needs. The addition of new wells within the City of Shakopee is based on the City's population projections. Currently, SPUC projects adding two new wells in the next five years to serve the City's growing population. According to Schoell and Madson, Inc., a consultant for SPUC the Met Council criteria for secondary schools for sewage generation is one Service Availability Charge (SAC) unit per 14 students. One SAC unit equals 274 gallons per day. SPUC estimates that each student or staff member will use approximately 20 gallons/day. The projected school occupancy is 2,588 persons. This creates an estimated average daily demand of 51,760 GPD for the school and using a peaking factor of three the peak daily usage would be 155,280 GPD. SPUC has confirmed that this capacity will be available for the New Shakopee High School The project site does not fall within the FEMA 1 OO-year flood plain or the Shoreline Zoning District according to the City of Shakopee Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (1999). No state or federally designated wild or scenic river land use district exists on the property according to the Minnesota DNR's Wild, Scenic, and. Recreational Rivers map. Not Applicable .. The Soil Survey of Scott County, Minnesota (Index Map Sheets 3) shows the area soils that have steep slopes and/or are highly erodible as: . Dakota sandy loam, 2-6 percent slopes, moderately eroded (DbB2) . Estherville loam and sandy loam, 2-6 percent slopes, moderately eroded (EaB2) . Estherville loam and sandy loam, 6-12 percent slopes, moderately eroded (EaC2) . Estherville gravelly sandy loam, 6-12 percent slopes (EbC) . Hayden soils, 18-25 percentslopes, severely eroded (HcE3) . Hubbard loamy fine sand, 2-6 percent slopes, moderately wind eroded (HeB2) . Lester silt loam, 2-6 percent slopes (LcB) . Lester silt loam, 2-6 percent slopes, moderately eroded (LcB2) . Lester silt loam, 12-18 percent slopes, moderately eroded (LcD2) . Waukegan silt loam, 2-6 percent slopes (WaB) These soils are discussed further in Question 19.B. of this EA W. New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee,~Urrnesota 8 '" The site is generally flat with gradually descending slopes towards the open drainageway from the southeast . comer to the north of the site. The area of concern during construction is located in the southwest corner of the site. The developer will be required to provide erosion and sediment control during construction of the site. This could include, but is not limited to, staggering siltfence, erosion control blankets, temporary seeding, and the application of mulch. Erosion and sedimentation issues will be addressed for the construction of the new high school during the MPCA NPDES Construction Permit application process. As part ofthis permit application process a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required. The SWPPP will be required to address ero,sion and sediment control within the project site prior to construction until final stabilization or turf establishment on the site. The City of Shakopee's current Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan establishes storm water management practices within the City. The City requires the use of the MPCA Best Management Practices that utilizes Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) recommendations in the design of retention and treatment basins. Adherence to the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan includes the following storm water pollution prevention plans: . Skimmers in new pond outlets, . Provisions for coarse sedimentation and skimming floatable materials, . Encouragement of vegetative buffer strips adjacent to ponding areas, . Proper management of storm water discharges, . Storm water drainage system maintenance plan. Based on-the information contained in the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for the City, storm water impacts for the proposed high school cannot exceed the current storm water discharge rate for the project site. Adherence to the above mentioned plan and req~irements will control the runoff from the site during construction and help manage and treat runoff after construction. The created storm water ponds within the site are permanent storm water pollution prevention control structures that will aid in preventing pollution to the receiving water bodies further down the stOrnl water system. It is proposed that storm water runoff from the site be treated in three ponds located south of the proposed 17th A venue Extension, as set':n in Appendix B. The proposed site development contains 6-acres of ponding to treat storm water runoff. To satisfy NURP recommendations for the site, approximately 4 acre-feet of dead pool storage volume is required. The City is currently in the process of revising their storm water management plan to include more details on drainage requirements, ponding areas, and infiltration considerations for this site and others located within the Jackson Township Annexation Area. This site will need to meet the requirements of the plan revisions. NewShakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee, Minnesota 9 . w . The City of Shakopee' s Comprehensive Stonnwater Management Plan outlines stonn water discharge directions and locations. The majority of the stonn water from the site will be directed into on-site stonn water treatment pond basins near the 17th A venue Extension. The treated stonn water drainage will then drain into a trunk stonn sewer discharge pipe under 17th A venue Extension to the north through the Countryside Residential Development and through crossing No.3 ofTH 169 and continue north into the Shakopee Upper Valley Drainageway. The Upper Valley Drainageway consists of an open ditch stonn water conveyance system that directs treated stonn water into the Minnesota River. The surface water outlet for the Upper Valley Drainageway is located on the north side of the City near Cavanaugh Drive and Viking Steel Road and crosses under TH 101 before entering the Minnesota River. The peak channel flow for the 100-year event at this outlet is estimated at 716 cfs, The City's Comprehensive Stonnwater Management Plan outlines policies for on-site retention and treatment. The City's policies for stonn water infiltration, rate control, and treatment will minimize the impact of stonn water on the water quality of receiving waters within the development and downstream, both now and in the future. If the school is going to have its own irrigation well, then the water usage should be very much equal to the sewage generation. Data for the existing high school, which has an irrigation well for the athletic fields, reflects similar water usage to sewage generation. It is estimated by SPUC that the total water usage should be 51,760 gallons per day (GPD) for the facility. Nonnal domestic sewage will be generated by the site and treated at Blue Lake Treatment Facility. It is estimated that this site will generate 51,760 GPD. The estimate assumes that the proposed new high school and future expansion will occupy approximately 2,588 people that will each generate 20 GPD. Wastewater will not be treated on-site. All wastewater generated will be directed to the Blue Lake Treatment Facility collection system. Nonnal domestic sewage generated by the site will be treated at Blue Lake Treatment Facility. It is anticipated that sanitary sewer flow generated by the institution can be accommodated by the City of New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee,11ll1nesota 10 ~ Shakopee sanitary sewer system. The sanitary sewer system was constructed with the anticipation . of development in this area. Not Applicable Based on the information from the Scott County Soil Survey, there are no known sink holes, shallow limestone formations, or karst conditions within the site. Groundwater in the area generally flows to the northwest within the Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer. Information about groundwater and bedrock depths came from the Geological Atlas of Scott County, MN and the Scott County GIS - Environmental Mapping internet site. The Soil Survey of Scott County, Minnesota (Index Map Sheets 3) shows the following soils in the project area: . . Dakota sandy loam, 0-2 percent slopes (DbA) ( Somewhat excessively drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace. The surface soil granularity is a sandy loam. The soil permeability is very rapid and the available water capacity is low. Susceptible to wind erosion. . Dakota sandyloam,2-6 percent slopes, moderately eroded (DbB2) Somewhat excessively drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace. The surface soil sranularity is a sandy loam. The soil permeability is very rapid and the available water c!lpacity is low. Susceptible to wind erosion and water erosion. . ,Estherville loam and sandy loam; 0-2 percent slopes (EaA) Somewhat excessively drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace, outwash plain, or moraine. The surface soil granularity is loam. The soil permeability is very rapid and the available water capacity is low. . Estherville loam and sandy loam, 2-6 percent slopes, moderately eroded (EaB2) Somewhat excessively drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace, outwash plain, or moraine. The surface soil granularity is loam. The soil permeability is very rapid and the ,available water capacity is low. Previously eroded soil susceptible to water erosion. Potential for surface-water contamination. New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee, Minnesota 11 ~ . Estherville loam and sandy loam, 6-12 percent slopes, moderately eroded (EaC2) . Somewhat excessively drained outwash soil characteristic ofa stream terrace, outwash plain, or moraine. The surface soil granularity is loam. The soil permeability is very rapid and the available water capacity is low. Previously eroded soil susceptible to water erosion. Potential for surface-water contamination. . Estherville gravelly sandy loam, 0-6 percent slopes (EbB) An excessively drained soil characteristic of a stream terrace, outwash plain, or moraine. The surface soil granularity is gravelly sandy loam. The soil permeability is very rapid and the available water capacity is low. Soil susceptible to water erosion. Potential for surface-water contamination. . Estherville gravelly sandy loam, 6-12 percent slopes (EbC) An excessively drained soil characteristic of a stream terrace, ou~ash plain, or moraine. The surface soil granularity is gravelly sandy loam. The soil permeability is very rapid and the available water capacity is low. Soil susceptible to water erosion. Potential for surface-water contamination. . Hayden soils, 18-25 percent slopes, severely eroded (HcE3) A well drained soil characteristic of moraines. The surface soil granularity is clay loam. Soil contains limited organic material. The soil occurs on slopes, is previously eroded, susceptible to water erosion, and has the potential for surface-water contamination. . Hubbard loamy fme sand, 2-6 percent slopes, moderately wind eroded (HeB2) An excessively drained soil characteristic of a stream terrace. The surface soil granularity is loamy fine sand. The soil permeability is very rapid, available water capacity is low, and organic matter content is limited. The soil is previously eroded and susceptible to wind erosion. Potential for surface-water contamination. . Lester silt loam, 2-6 percent slopes (LcB) This well drained soil is characteristic of a moraine. The surface soil granularity is loam. The soil is susceptible to water erosion and surface 'Yater contamination. . Lester silt loam, 2-6 percent slopes, moderately eroded (LcB2) This well drained soil is characteristic of a moraine. The surface soil granularity is loam. The soil is susceptible to water erosion and surface water contamination. . Lester silt loam, 12-18 percent slopes, moderately eroded (LcD2) This we I! drained soil is characteristic of a moraine. The surface soil granularity is loam. The soil is located on slopes and susceptible to water erosion and surface water contamination. . Terrace escarpments (Ta) Variable glacial sediments characteristic of a terrace. . - Waukegan silt loam, 0-2 percent slopes (WaA) Well drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace. The surface soil granularity is silt loam. Soil permeability is excessive. New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee, Minnesota 12 .. .. Waukegan silt loam, 2-6 percent slopes (WaB) .. Well drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace. The surface soil granularity is silt loam. The soil permeability is very rapid. Susceptible to wind erosion. Potential for surface~water contamination. Based on information from the Scott County Geological Atlas, the sensitivity of the Prairie du Chien~Jordan aquifer to pollution is considered high within the project site; The area is considered highly susceptible to contamination due to the thickness of unconsolidated surficial material in the area ranging from less than 50 feet to 100 feet. However, the proposed high school is not anticipated to create the potential for groundwater contamination as hazardous waste will not be present on-~ite. Additionally, storm water will be pretreated on-site prior to discharge to infiltration areas. Commercial solid waste will be generated by this project. Municipal solid waste will be hauled away by local garbage haulers and the School District will be encouraged to recycle. - During construction, vehicles containing gasoline will be present on site. However, the potential for contamination is low and no toxic or hazardous materials will be present after construction. All waste and unused building materials shall be properly disposed of off-site and not allowed to be carried by runoff into a receiving channel or storm sewer system. Not applicable New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee,11~esota 13 . " Traffic Generation -:- .. ' Daily Traffic AM Peak PM Peak Hiah School Site Phase 1 1,600 students 2,736 656 448 Exoansion 800 students 1,368 328 224 Countrvside Site . ,. SinQle Familv 449 units 4.297 337 454 Total Develooment Area 8,401 1,321 1,126 The estimated trip generation is based on information identified in the 7th Edition ofthe Institute of Traffic TransportationEngineers (ITE) Trip General Manual. Figures C-t and C-2, located in Appendix C, illustrate the traffic distribution for the proposed new high school, as well as the existing daily, AM peak, and PM peak hour traffic volumes on the impacted roadways. The existing traffic volumes are based on traffic volume counts conducted in August 2004. The traffic count worksheets are included in Appendix C. The proposed high school development is anticipated to be constructed and opened in August 2006 with a future expansion completed by 2010. In addition, the proposed residential development located adjacent to the proposed high school, was also included as part of the overall traffic generation. The development impacts were analyzed for the year - 20 I 0 and 2025, assuming full build conditions for both time periods. The primary impacted roadways adjacent to the development are CO,unty Road (CR) 79 on the easterly border ofthe site, CR 77 running north/south thrqugh the center of the site, County State Aid Highway (CSAR) 15 on the western borderofthe site, and the proposed 17th Avenue extension running east/~est through the center of the site. The primary access to the high school will be provided via access points on 17th Avenue, CR 77, and CR 79. The attached Figure C-3 shows the proposed 17th A venue alignment and the anticipated access points to the proposed high school, as well as to the proposed residential development. The proposed site traffic generation for the high school site and Countryside Residential Development discussed above was distributed to the adjacent roadway system based on the site traffic distribution as indicated in Figure Ct. This traffic distribution is based on existing traffic patterns in the area and preliminary traffic modeling prepared for the City's transportation plan update currently being prepared. ' The results of the traffic forecasting is shown on Figures C-4 and C-5 illustrating the AM and PM peak hour site generated traffic on the adjacent roadway system. The 2010 and 2025 total traffic volumes were developed to include the proposed site-generated traffic from the adjacent development, as well as a background (non-site) traffic on the impacted roadways. This background traffic was developed based on the anticipated traffic growth from the preliminary Shakopee transportation plan update currently being prepared. Based on that preliminary analysis, it is anticipated that there would be approximately a 3% per year growth in traffic onCR 79, CR 77, and CSAR 15. The background traffic volume on the new extension of 17th A venue was developed based on New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee,~llrnesota 14 . the assumption that the roadway would have an average daily traffic of 10,000 vehicles per day in 2010 - and 15,000 vehicles per day in 2025. The proposed site-generated traffic was then removed from this number and the remainder was considered the background traffic. Figures C-6 through C-ll in Appendix C show the 2010 and 2025 total projected traffic volumes on impacted roadways. 2010 and 2025 level of service analyses were conducted for the AM and PM peak hours on each. of the impacted intersections. The following table illustrates .the results of the level of service analysis. Level of Service Analvsis Results 2010 with 2020 with Intersection 2004 2010 Mitiaation 2020 Mitiaation AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM 17'" Ave at: eR79 B B E F e' C' F F ..-- B~ B~ High School Entrance NA NA e e NA NA 0 e ' NA NA eR77 NA NA e e NA NA e e NA NA Full Dev Access NA NA B B N~ NA B B NA NA eSAH15 NA NA e 0 NA NA 0 F B~ B~ eSAH 15 at: M TH169 ramp B B B B. NA NA e E A~ B~ S TH169 ramp e i3 0 e NA NA F e, e~ A~ 1 Mitigation includes change from 2-way stop to 4-way stop. 2 Mitigation includes installation of a signal system when warranted/justified. The proposed baseline roadway geometrics assumed in the analyses include the following, and are illustrated in Figure C-3found in Appendix C. 1. CR 79 - Widen to provide aright turn lane, through lane, and left turn lane in each direction at the intersection of 17th/Avenue. Widen to accommodate a right turn lane and left turn lane at the proposed high school site entrance south of 17th Avenue. 2. CR 77 - Widen to provide a right turn through lane and a left turn lane in each direction at 17th Avenue. Widen to provide a right turn lane at the development/high school access south of 17th Avenue for northbound traffic. 3. CSAH 15 - Widen to provide a bypass lane for southbound traffic and a right turn lane for northbound traffic at 17th Avenue. 4. . 17th Avenue - New roadway with raised concrete median, with left turn lanes at all full movement access points and right turn lanes at all access points. Full movement access will be provided at the main high schooVresidential development access at the midpoint between CR 79 and CR 77, and one full movement access between CR 77 and CSAH15. In addition, right in/right out only access points will be provid~d between CR 79 and CR 77 at two locations, and between CR 77 and CSAH 15 at one location. The baseline intersection traffic control that was assumed for the analysis includes: 1. CR 79 at 17th Avenue - 2-way stop sign control stopping 17th Avenue. 2. 17th Avenue at High School/Development Access - 2-way stop sign control stopping the high school entrance/development access. New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee,11ll1nesota 15 . 3. 17th A venue at CR 77 - 2-way stop sign control stopping CR 77. 4. 17th Avenue at Site Development Access - 2-way stop control stopping site development access. 5. 17th Avenue at CSAH 15 - One-way stop control stopping 17th Avenue. The results of the analysis indicate that all development right in/right out site accesses on 17th A venue and the development site accesses on CR 77 and CR 79 would operate at LOS B or better in 2010 and 2025 with the proposed lane geometries. TheCR79 at proposed 17th Avenueis currently operating at an LOS B during the AM and PM peak hour. With the proposed development site traffic and the baseline intersection traffic control, the intersection would operate at level service E in theAMpeak hour and Fin the PM peak hour in 2010. With the installation of an all-way stop at that intersection, the level of service would improve to LOS C in the AM peak hour and PM peak hour for 2010. By the year 2025, the intersection would be operating at anLOS F in the AM and PM peak hours with the all-way stop condition. This intersection should be considered for signalization in the future, as development occurs in the area and traffic signal warrants are met and signal is justified. With signalization, the intersection would operate as a LOS B in the AM and PM peak hours. The full movement intersections at the high school/development entrance, CR 77 and the site development access on 17th A venue, would all-operate at LOS C or better in 2010 and 2025, with proposed lane geometries and intersection traffic controls. . No additional intersection mitigation would be required inthe future. The Intersection of CSAH 15 and 17th A venue would operate at an LOS C in the AM and D in the PM peak hour in20 1 0 with the proposed lane geometries and intersection traffic control. By the year 2025, the PM peak hour would be at LOSF with these conditions. CSAH 15 is currently a 4-lane facility with turn lanes at the TH 169 ramps to TH I (j9. It is anticipated that as development continues to grow south ofTH 169, this roadway will be upgraded to provide, ala minimum, turn lanes. at major intersections. . In addition, this intersection would be acandidate for signalization in the future, should 17th Avenue be extended to the west to CR 69. With potential signalization of this intersection and upgrading to provide a minimum left turn, through, and right turn lane in each direction, the intersection level of service in 2025 would improve to LOS B in the AM and PM peak hours. ',-- Regional impacts were also reviewed. The regional impacts for the proposed development are at the CSAH 15 and TH 169 ramp intersections. As shown in the LOS analysis, the proposed development does not have an impact on the existing roadway system in 2010. However, by 2025, with the proposed site traffic and additional background traffic, signalization ofthese intersections may be justified. Approximately 20% of the proposed site traffic is anticipated to use these ramp intersections. Based on this data and analysis, the proposed site traffic now and in the future will have a minimal impact on the existing and proposed roadway system. With the anticipated extension of 17th Avenue and the recommended roadway improvements, any impact should become negligible. Coordination is necessary between the developer, the City of Shakope_e~ and Scott County to ensure that the accesses are constructed as permitted. New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee, Minnesota 16 . - The proposed 'project will include the development of a new high school. A carbon monoxide analysis is not required for this project. It is anticipated that state and federal guidelines would not be exceeded. No stationary sources of air emissions are anticipated to be constructed as part of the project. Noise Noise from construction activity is anticipated to temporarily increase. However, upon completion of construction of the site, only normal noise levels associated with a residential condition are anticipated. Dust During construction, particulate emission will temporarily increase due to generation of fugitive dust. The following dust control measures will be undertaken as necessary: 1. Minimize the period and extent of area being exp~sed or regraded at anyone time. 2. Spraying construction areas~and haul roads with water, especially during periods of high wind or high levels of construction activity. 3. Minimize the use of vehicles on unpaved surfaces. 4. Covering or spraying material piles and truck loads. Odors The construction and/or operation of this project is not anticipated to involve any processes or materials that would generate. any odors. New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee,11ll1nesota 17 . Archeological, Historical, or Architectural Resources There are no known historical, archaeological, or architectural resources within the area according to the email received from the Minnesota State Historical Preservation Office (SHPOYThe SHPO has recently determined that with regard to Environmental Assessment Worksheets (EA W), a negative known site/structure response from the SHPO databases is not necessarily appropriate information on which to base a "No" response to EA W Question 25a. It is the Responsible Governmental Unit's (RGU) obligation to verify the accuracy of the information contained within the EA W. A "No" response to Question 25a without written justification should be carefully considered. The SHPO correspondence email is included in Appendix D. The City is not aware of any known archeological, historical, or archifectural resources on the site. Prime or Unique Farmlands Based on information from the Scott County Soil Survey the following are Prime Farmland Soils: . Waukegan silt loam, 0-2 percent slopes (WaA) Well drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace. . Waukegan silt loam, 2-6 percent slopes (WaB) Well drained outwash soil characteristic of a stream terrace. This area will be converted from agriculture to play fields, open space, and possibly storm ponds. A figure of the listed soils is included in Appendix D. Parks and Trails The closest developed city parks are located at least Yz mile northwest and northeast of the project site. These parks do not border the property, and are separated from the property by the four-lane Highway 169. Closer to the project site, a proposed city park will be located approximately 1000 feet northeast of the project site across Townline Avenue, on the south edge of 17th Avenue. This park is also undeveloped. The City of Shako pee hopes to acquire the property and develop the park in 2005. Three township parks are located within close proximity to the project site. South of the site, a park is located in the center of the Glen Ellyn Park hOUSIng development. The housing development is adjacent to the project site, and houses completely encircle the park. A second park area is located across Koepper Avenue southwest of the project area. A third park is located approximately Yz mile southwest of the high school site, at the corner of 15th Avenue and County Road 78. These township parks have no recreational developments and are maintained as grassy open areas. Two golf courses are, located approximately Yz to one mile south of the project site. Thole and O'Dowd Lakes are located approximately two miles south of the project site. Because these parks and recreation areas are not on or adjacent to the project site, no adverse impacts to parks are anticipated from construction of the high school. There are no trails currently on or adjacent to the property. Paved shoulder trails exist along 130th Street W (County Road 78) and Marschall Road (County Road 17) approximately Yz mile south and east ofthe New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee, Minnesota 18 property. A segment ofa Scott County regional trail is located north of the property. The trail originates - in the City of Shakopee and extends southward along Townline Avenue (County Road 79) as far as crossing Highway 169 with a pedestrian bridge. At the present time, it is assUJ,ned that regional trails will extend south across 17th Avenue along both.the east and west sides of the high school site. The trail may only be developed from the intersection of 17th A venue and County Road 77 to the high school access driveway approximately 1/8 mile south of this intersection. Final design of this trail will depend upon on how trails are planned to be developed south of the high school site. In addition, it is assumed that the high school site will include an east-west sidewalk along 17th A venue. A regional trail is planned along the north side of 17th A venue as part of the Tollefson residential development located north of the site. A grant-in-aid snowmobile trail exists north of the property. The trail is only maintained during the winter and runs east-west, parallel to Highway 169. The trail is located primarily inthe Highway 169 right-of-way and, to a lesser extent, on private land. When on private land, the trail is located within 50 feet of the highway right-of-way. The trail does not cross or border the high school property. Most trails in the vicinity of the project site an~ notin immediate proximity to the project site, so there should be no adverse impacts from construction and operation of the high school. When the regional trail is constructed along the high school property, traffic entering and leaving the property will cross the trail. The trail already intersects numerous streets, which require trail users to use caution when crossing. Viewshed The project area is located below a ridge to the south. The ridge provides a view northward towards Shakopee. Construction of the high school should not impact scenic views. Construction operations will be required to meet the City's ordinances related to duration of construction activities. This project is subject to the following plans: . Scott County Comprehensive Plan The development of this site will be required to meet the policies of the County's Comprehensive Plan. This will be addressed during the plan review process. . City of Shako pee Comprehensive Plan (Upqates 1999 and2004) The development of this site is addressed in the City's latest update of their Comprehensive Plan. The requirements of the City's plan will be addressed as part ofthe plan review and permitting process. New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee, 11h1nesota 19 . . City of Shakopee Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan . The storm water management for the site will be required to meet the policies ofthe City's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan. This will be addressed during the City's plan review process. A review of the Scott County Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan Updates, and the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan was completed. The New Shakopee High School plan will be required to meet the standards and policies in the comprehensive plans. The Comprehensive Plan (Updates 1999 and January 2004) for the City of Shakopee provides information on combined storm and sanitary sewer extension ratings as well as water service for the City. The storm and sanitary combined ratings for the project area are ranked high in ease of extension from existing locations. Storm sewer plans for the development will be required to be in conformance with City policies included in the Comprehensive Plan and Stormwater Comprehensive Plan. Water and sanitary sewer lines will be extended from existing developments east of the project area to serve the new- high school. Construction of the Countryside Residential Development and 17th A venue Extension is anticipated to occur in the area north of the proposed new high school. A separate EAW was completed for this development (EQB publication date September 13,2004). The regional land use conversion from open space and agriculture to developed residential space is anticipated to ha~e a cumulative impact on the area. Attempts to mitigate this impact will include providing open space in the developments, providing . adequate storm water management facilities, and addressing traffic impacts. The City's current ordinances, standards, and policies are anticipated to be adequate to address these issues. No other environmental impacts are anticipated by this project. New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee,11litnesota 20 . . The recognized environmental impacts associated with the New Shakopee HighSchool project are as follows: 1. - The land use will be converted from agricultural to Public/Semi Public: The plans include open space providing recreational athletic opportunities to the student body and public as well as numerous storm ponds to mitigate this impact. 2. Sanitary sewer flows and water consumption, will increase: The Blue Lake Wastewater Treatment Facility has adequate capacity to handle the sewage volumes from this site: The increase in water will be mitigated by the expansion of the City's water supply, storage, and distribution systems. 3. Stormwater runoff volume will increase and runoff pollutant loads will increase: According tothe Concept Plan approximately 9 acres of ponding/infiltration basins will be created to accommodate the increased stormwater runoff volume. The impacts related to storm water quality and quantity will be mitigated by the use of the on-site storm water treatment ponds to reduce pollutant loads. 4. Based on the data collected and analysis, the proposed site traffic now and in the future will have a minimal impact on the existing and proposed roadway system. With the anticipated extension of I 7th Avenue and the recommended roadway improvements, any impact should become negligible. Coordination is necessary between the developer, the City of Shakopee, and Scott County to ensure that the accesses are constructed as permitted. New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee, Minnesota 21 . RGU CERTIFICATION. . I hereby certify that: . The infonnation contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. . The EA W describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the projectas connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minn. R. 4410.0200, subps. 9b and 60, respectively. , . Copies ofthis EA Ware being sent to the entire EQBdistribution list. Name and Title of Signer: ,. Date: The fonnat of the Environmental Assessment W orkshee~ was prepared by the staff of the Environmental Quality Board at Minnesota Planning. For additional infonnation, worksheets or for EAW Guidelines, contact: Environmental Quality Board, 658 Cedar 8t., 8t. Paul, MN 55155,651-296-8253, or at their Web site http://www.mnplan.state.mn.us. New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet Shakopee, Minnesota 22 . . ,. APPENDIX . . .. APPENDIX A Gen.eral Location Map, U.S.G.S. Quad Map, and Aerial Photo - :; .. . ::l ," ~'" :g iO , ..'<t .. 0 0 '" .. ~ Miasville .' .- ~~ I ~ General Location Map N New Shakopee High SchoolEA W W+E . utsB SHAKO PEE Cit of Shako ee, MN 0 19,000' 38,000 76,000 Feet s ~ __ _ : .... '-J .. : '4.~. ';{~:l~~~~t~~\~~?<f~l~"" ~/y ~ 'I " :I"'"''''':-l;'''~''''''''' '" - i "". !A::;;~~:?~~:~~;;:~ ./ c~ i :: ~}.. I -."' :::';..I:.-,::..;_:~,',,j\,"'" ""y. ~_ _'. _ /.-/ ~ I ., r.. .":'J+~.... -,.. ... t .__ _ . I , ~) 1" "..( '- -~~~:fi'--' ~ I '--/ I '-'-'-/ 1f I -.~--.... - l ..... __ ~ r "', ( ......_"""'--- CJ i · ~ "..... ~-. - ____------:>"., 3 I Cl . --..... - -' ~f .', /- "_ .,) . I ~' r/-~:-<:-:~-'~L)]~~~;;~j --_, i-'\ ;, ,'- i \ I \ . .~ /.- ---.... ." ,.........._'-,.~..:.~~~J>> _J t--~J', '___ ~ i : ,-"-'" /' ~- -' '. ..,,[, f- -.-;;.~t; "'",; \ '--~ \' -. t · 3: v-~-' ':-. .'-.." I ., ". ..,1 I 0.. ,.-, i '-J ; . I / . . ' J '.-" rsJ \, ; I ("',; \ u: .---.; , \ "'-.. \ ......, j I · ~-~7~'-=-'-'-:.o..L..---'" ) \1 I '. l ( -:l - 'i- '-.j -----=:--- r~'--~HIGHWA-tY 169 .-"'. I. _' _'_ . ,/: : -- ,'F.---.-,... , _-=--!- - .- -.... I , --"""-.~ -..&..-.= _' ...........~_..... / ..... { - - - -... 1- . - II' ~ ..... -... ,. - ..~ - - ..- ...... ~. . ..-'- ~ '.-. . ...... ". ...- . .. -. ... _ oJ"" '-:Y .....-~_..... ..--.......-.--... - ---. 825 -.. "/ ;-., I . __ ........ '._-. -\(~--- -..L_____-....: . .- /...--___../ '1(-'~ I'-'-~-,,", r-..., '-----,I', ' ,--" --\ ,'--.v.-.../ (-' ,- -.--..,,' ".....l '\ -~-, :' ',., /" . I,. ,- 1'..--- -', '- '. ',-.--. I., __i ". \. 0 J I '.,.,j '''__~..) ..J ' - ". '.', ~- ---, .J 0 r. '-... '\ ,.~__, _ .'_ ~ " ( C~., '. i Project Location "'---, . -', -"\ \ ( ,- ..... i '.. \- \ '\ /------" \ \ \ : * \ ."\ '-~_ I \ \ \ --. ,.1 . , ... ... '-.. ., )' , .~ , \ I .<.~ .. ( i \~ . \ ' 1 " '-'" '~', I '. , ) .'''''. I '.......-..... ~ I '....,. "'.. " '. " c:9.s. '.. "- A:L " '.." .c::; .---,~. .:.\ '..--....-.......------.-- -- " ._-.) ~. - 0 I I -. - .~ I ... 0 500 1,000 2,000 WSB Feet S ~ ....-10......,..,.._,./.., .- --~ ..~-_.- -- -- ~,~-- ~,~_. ._,-- - &:~ 'J: '. ~ , '" ~ ! >"IV'" ~ ~ Aerial Map N New Shakopee High School EA W W+E ... 0 500 1,000 2,000 WSB SHAKO PEE eit of Shako ee, MN Feet s - ,'..1",-,..-"",-,/," ,. ~ .. -. APPENDIX B Concept Design - . - . w.., , - ,-- '-I -""I I ~III -rJn~~ I T -1II111-~I-:-I-:~DJ)!~'~ _~J Jll~~.~ 'e - ~ . _ _.. _. _ _ dK ~..;, , ., ~ ~ 'H rn .;&/~,.. . ~.;J;:" - , m1. I ~ '1'1- -~,: ~.~ ,J ~: :::!' ,:;~ ~~~,1I!' -""'-: ,'" 'II\-~~\hi'{ ~ ~, _ '" ~~ I.. -;- "'1" \ "- . '/ I" """ ' " ~:'V I . -- ".,~ · . 1 ~ _ ; " , :. , J' L: .. 'I --(~ j II. it. , P" ~tHtsif\n l "H .. I , \,'l,_ r ~ . . . , ,> _ , .'. ' , _. ~, --1.1 _. - ~- -.'0- ""'---.,--b._8J!l -- --,--,-_~ '. ,---.1. I '.-1,1, _______ ,>_ --;A-;: _ 'n" ,,_ _" ___._! .. ~='!L I - ,--;~~~~:...."".:::::..~-;&1i'~ -'" ~ --... .:>~iJ.i,!ii:"' ~~,~ ~<:.~~.;;;.i= '.;=.1 .~'" ~t ~ ,q, ,., -" '~-""- ~ _ '_~=_~" .,~ ' .. _ ~1 ~ -- "",-' ~ .--------;;:~l!lIiI:li~'liial;l:;~~~~ ~1il.:::Jr.lIliil:l .::l'.l'ti~ .....~ i III ..-~......- ...::. 1 "-= ~:i-~~'!!1l!,~~..:::~~,,~~! ' , ., ~"~ =',," '~'__" .-_.~___ ~ f rl::- !~l ~4f'~ 'f'Jlr "i~ FI,' .'.j ~~Ti ' "/y ,,"'" ,,;;. -- " i~ -. ~,7, '~/ :~\~'" ",' -: J!ri\' ~ "'~., l?~:JL.t }fo '~~ ~ \Ii i 1I:r'" ~. \ ; \ i I ", ~ ~ 11' ,it'" ....~~ ~~=: ~ ,'-. '-. ~ .- I",,; "':;':, ,~ " , ,I ' ,I ." -- · " ~~~ ~"" ""- ~_ 1 ,[ r 1/." f · oo"mY \ '", (X" . r---::::: :y? '/ ~~'~ ,\ '/ I : . " , \: ~"- "- " \ ~ II j " ~ ' , / W ,; ~ ' I i b~ ,,-, = A . , .,' .'''''' ~ . ,co ;.:.:-.. \"./-1' /.,;" ~'I: 1'1 .. v r'/ -;.z: / :!. r; 7 11~ '\.---" ., --------rll // , ~ ,J ~ ' t;;.~......./.. ~ " ' '\~ YJI'l. ~ ( ~'S~,/ /' 7 ~(n ' ' · I:V ~ 'I~ , , . 1~h''It '. . ~,,-'Ii~, ,., 'I '[L I r-l : f( ~ ( ~ \'t!",.r""',Jii>-",I'lo r(\ ~="'" 'I ~I I, ,III!' ~~ . ~ (\ li! '" ,..,." ,~, ~\" ~=l!'i! I r -h=lIr-,./ '---... - '"' )-l\ .- ./ lV ~ r r r - . ..( '-~:: ~ ~i "':'\0. I. 'Il! IT -" r - " - \ / OO"mY " ' ,\ ' I!' ~ il:iJ.!'l ' .,/ 5.. .. - ,5 11\ C "", j \ ~ n;;:'<r-o : Ir'n '" 1 ....------c :.--- ~ ::::=:: :t:-;:::::::::-:: =- ~ ' -----= / ~ 7 9 .. II" m,m - V ~ ( ~ =~ cC'c-~ " . ~ if _ ': . ~~l~ . /_~"- .f:/~7 .~-~l\~~~~^-~~.~ // '~_ "~., ',I '.. 11- J !ill ,- ~ L ". / L~ \ -..2---J'*= --- ~ . . II "~1 1 ....., ''',.. '" '.'" - , - XL--v ..""r.o......--~ ;;-;-:l'~ ,'" . <"~ I 'J,,1'~ s.:: - .' I ...",~ ;7.,.. k, ---.; , '. ,;,",..,., .,.r ,~, ' . ,,~'"~ _, ':;' ;_~. II ^', r-= \ " " - - , ~ l ,_ I W I \ ' t:J,..,r. \' ,. ' ., . "'l'i .. . I \ 1': ",6 L "'~. V~~.;-;_. f ..... ('... ....h ~'$A~ I~j _, r~! .;..~ ,r.". I ~-':......... ~. . '-' '---" I ~ - .. - J II, ~ ~ I!:l; ~. ".... J l , J '._ 't ,. I :'.~ ~ I 1S;~"1 .;.~'l':' . " . , ;"'cC' ,," '~Is?'" .' ~" '>---;';'f.";.'ilt. ~r-' ')'~',~, ',',. ' ~,e:, ~ ' < ,~/~~~~~ ;t', ~~ ~ J~' :~!J~/ 1, 'M~~I:;:"!A: If~jt"*' ~.. ,-"tef), '; 11 1 ~<~,. ", '--, ~ -- '0 .~ ~ '/'" J "'" ... 't;"'-~. ., . '. I, ",..,. J..': ,. ~,y.ii ~o;j. ~ ~ Z ;1"'" fI>'~,; ~"'~~r ". "',. -L.,ti ..' _, ...".;....1. i, '- ....J . ~~' - ~, .' .... ",.. f~ ' ~l . ~,\ ...ll':~'I\~p,_.[ . I' :.. · , ~-~ - ", ~" ~' .. <'" ."1" \..., 1i'..J,?f" -/! ,. '.', ' ! .... ~'" ,; %".}41!"!; ~,':~;;it;~~r,iJ'If' If!Se~~beri.21,_2004J I +/{~ "..--...., ~Jt ~~~~.....~. ~~~- ','.' ...-~ .. j~'I"I,"" Jf? "t, . .~..,r- :l. rz: ._" n.,u. _" I t'; '-rr,' .... . ';:~, "'_ "~;rnt'IIG2t ~ . ~~. ,tJ&;;",/,i.. , I ;;~... . . , " . _ ~ :h"::' .~ ~ ~~.~:' ..:..;:, ._ ----... ~- Preliminary Concept Plan ~'" ttsB ..":::;:; New Shakopee High School ~~o ':0 "~:::~~~7._.,,.. "'W.'" .,,, SHAKOPEE City of Shakopee, Minnesota . - .- APPENDIX C Traffic Analysis -~~~----'------------_._---'-_.~--~-'-~_.~----~-~--~ .~."-~--~---'._~'_.'---- 10 or- :c <C (J) 0> () r--. ci t~ ,0:: r-. c:j ~ r-. t\,., ci () or 0:: c:j () -- ~--_----: - - - - - -.-' - - _.-:...-- t\,., ~ ~ ~ .0 It) 0 It) 0 ~ N i'-- .~ .~. ~ ,.It\'" +- .Ji'-- +- 300/0 or or or .~ t rr ,,;j. "\trr ,,;j. ",tl'. 17TH AVE -+ -+ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~~ ~ ~ :c <C 10 - 10 (J) () ~ A 4150 Olson Memorial Highway NEW SHAKOPEE HIGH SCHOOL EAW N Suite 300 Figure C-1 WSB Minneapolis. MN 55422 ~ City of Shakopee A 763-541-1800 Trip Distribution &: AssociaJes. 1m:. FAX 763-541-1700 SHAKOPEE Scott County, Minnesota 1I~1;f:l'}""1J:tJI"llm:fIW..::j~l{ctIJI~~:J,."""":J.~'\ll~Il:4:f.,.'"1 t'\01281-69\hi9h school\ fig-01.dgn LO ~ J: <( U) Ol () r-- r-- 0 ......10 0:: NN N r-- d ON r-- () MN ~ 62 216 ci ~'*' ~ 18 84 0:: d () D Iii >~AlJ' ~'.. ------ ------------ .. - --0- lXl . 0)'0 ...... ...... 0) NCO ION !'*' 1, ......'</" lXl1'- ...... 1'- 10...... a a a a v ~ -c:- ~ m co ....... C\l v 0) CON ...... lXl 10 lXl ..- ..- frio 1'- NN ~ 119 131 N ~O OC01'- !'-- aNa +- 0 ~O "!'-- +- 0 "!'" ~ 15 44 3200 ~o ~o oJ! "'\t, 17TH AVE tl' OJ! "'\t, o .... o .... o")c 010"- 100 O")C OCOO LON LO CO ...... ...... CO lXlCO lXl N ON CO a ...... co LO en .- ('t) J: <( U) () AM - XX PM - XX ADT-XX NEW SHAKOPEE HIGH SCHOOL EAW N A 4150 Olson Memorial Highway Figure C-2 A Suite 300 WSB Minneapolis, MN 55422 ~ City of Shako pee Existing 2004 763.541-4800 & AssociaieS. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 SI-IAKOPEE Scott County, Minnesota lI~f;:hl-......I:ul"'ltl:H.,.,.=~'ctl\!I=4=l:f,..... ":I..'llrm#:~"":I t'\01281-S9\high school\fi9-02.dgn . Preliminal)l Concept Plan ^ 17th Avenue Extension City of Shakopee, Minnesota , 0 SHAKO.PEE -,- '.olI_fo!1X! -------------.-- ------ . ..-0 -r 154 O~ "'\ I' CSAH15 77~ co (0 lO.... .... .... N ~ 12 '3"N(o .J!'-- "-0 -r 35 21 ..)l "'\11' COUNTRYSIDE o ~ co co 10 COUNTRYSIDE DEVELOPMENT 12 ~ ...... ~ DEVELOPMENT (0 (0 NN. .':" , .J! ~4 30 ~ 11' 0(0 (0 ...... '3" ~1 en ~4 (')0(') ~N~ ..I! '-- +-- 10 .J!,--"-2 N N ~1 . .e" 0 .e" 34 ..I '-- ..- 38 1 ~ _",\ tl' 8...;'l 1 co. RD. 77 1...;'l 10 ~."'\ I' 27~ 5 lOOIO . t--'3"(o 34 ~ .... .... 5~ 10.... ...... (') 010 CON ..I! ~ 14 15 ~ 11' (')10- (0 .... coo .... (') 0 ~30 ............N HIGH SCHOOL .J!,--"-O COUNTRYSIDE .e" 91 SITE 92...;'l "'\ 11' DEVELOPMENT o~ 0(010 51 ~ N '3" .... N o (') '3"N ..I! ~ 16 30 ~ 11' 100 10 ...... N CO ......'3"(') ~ 81 '3"......t-- (0 ...... ..I l '-- ..- 34 '3"'3" ~ 95 CO. RD. 79 ..I '-- ..- 81 .e"0 102...;'l 14...;'l "'\ 11' 14~ 14 ~ .... 0 0 27 ~ (0 ~ A 4150 Olson Memorial Highway NEW SHAKOPEE HIGH SCHOOL EAW Suite 300 Figure C-4 WSB Minneapolis, MN 55422 ~ City of Shakopee ~Z 763-541-4800 AM Site Traffic &: Associates. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 SHAKOPEE Scott County, Minnesota 11~1'it:l'~"'1f;:{lr"tll;:~""::l~[CfI~!==;:.J,."""':J.'li'I~I::t::~.... t'\01281-69\high school\ jig-04.dgn . +-0 r 101 CSAH15 . O~ ."\ I' 50~ N I.() CON ..... CO !'--..-to ~7 oc- ~ T""" .J ~ \t.+- 0 r 21 14..1l, "\ t I' O~ co co I.() COUNTRYSIDE 9 ~ '<t CO ..-. COUNTRYSIDE ..... DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT ..... '<t I.() ..- ~:. .J~ ~3 19 ~ tl' '<t'<t N N N I.() ~4 I.() ~O NON I.()..-O .J~\t.+-6 .J~\t. +-6 NN ~3 r 10 r 18 .J \t. +- 22 4..1l t 15..1l "\ t l' CO. RD. 77 2..1l 10 ~ "\ l' 20 ~ 0'1 C'l ..... 29~ C'lOC'l 11 ~ N N 1~ ' ~..- 0'1 I.()'<t N ..- .JJ ~9 29 ~ tl' '<tl.() '<t ..- N OtOO ~ 17 C'l to. CO .J~\t.+-O r52 HIGH SCHOOL 137..1l "\ t l' COUNTRYSIDE SITE DEVELOPMENT 0-+ tOI.()l.() 72~ co~'<t C\l 00 ..-C\l .J~ ~8 43 ~ tl' 00 ..... C'l N co ~~~, ~65 O'lN .J ! \t. +- 10 coco ~ 29 .J \t. +- 25 rO CO. RD. 79 32 ..1l 43 ~ "\ t l' 43-+ 21 -+ O'lN 0 41 ~ ..... ~ A 4150 Olson Memorial Highway _ NEW SHAKOPEE HIGH SCHOOL EAW Suite 300 Figure C-5 ~z WSB Minneapolis, MN 55422 ~ City of Shakopee 763.541-4800 PM Site Traffic &= Associates. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 SHAKOPEE Scott County, Minnesota Illllit:l'].."'1. :tl[..tll:I_..=-J{t:1IJf:f:f:'-#........:l'.l"'f~ll~:f.."1 t:\01281-69\high school\ fig-05.dgn . .-63 (:"220 CSAH 15 - 184-+ "\ l' 106~ 0> C') o"<t ..-N co vC;:;co ~ 12 II !~ .- 2 (:"35 21~ "\ 1 l' 2 -+ W 0> LO 12 ~ ...... c;:; COUNTRYSIDE ..- COUNTRYSIDE DEVELOPMENT .co ~DEVELOPMENT NC') II! ~4 30 ~ 11' wco C') C') W ~1 I'- ~7 C')NC') "<tC')0> II ! ~ .- 47 II!~ .- 28 NN ~..1 (:"2 (:"44 Jl ~'-77 1 ~ 1 12 ~ "\ 1 l' co. RD. 77 1~ 99 -+ "\1' 88 -+ LO LO co 133-+ LOC')LO 34~ ..- ...... 17 ~ ...... ~ C') 0> OLO wC') AI! ~ 14 15 ~ 11' NLO co C') W co ...... C') 0 ~30 ......NN 1I!~'-2 - (:" 91 HIGH SCHOOL 92 ~ ~ 1 l' COUNTRYSIDE 2-+ 0 LO LO SITE 51 ~ N c:!i...... DEVELOPMENT W OC') VC') AI! ~ 16 30 .~ 11' vO LO ..- V ..- O>C')W ~ 133 VNW co...... II ! ~ .- 108 '<tv ~ 95 II ~ .- 181 (:" 86 CO. RD. 79 1 02 .J< 49.J< t ~Z ' 258-+ 198 -+ "\ l' O>NN 52 ~ I'- ~ ~ A 4150 Olson Memarial Highway NEW SHAKOPEE HIGH SCHOOL EAW Figure C-6 . Suite 300 WSB Minneapalis, MN 55422 ~ Ci~ofShakopee 2010 TOTAL TRAFFIC 763-5414800 &: Msociales. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 SHAKOPEE ScottCounty, Minnesota AM PEAK 11;11;t:7.:.~"1~ :ur~tll:r:::cl''lI~\'[ctl~l::!=~-J,.''''':J 1"'~h~I=:~"" t"01281-69'high school\ fig-06.dgn +- 231 r 250 CSAH15 81~ '" l' 100~ 10 ~ ~1O ....N LO ...........co .~.7 .... (') .... J ~..~ +-2 . r 21 14 ~ '" 1 l' . 2~ IOCOLO 9~ "<I"~..... COUNTRYSIDE 0 COUNTRYSIDE "<I" DEVELOPMENT LO~ 'DEVELOPMENT J~ ~3 19 ~ 11' 10"<1" ~N "<I" "<I" ~'5 ~4 ........"<1" NNN N~N J ~ ~ +- 128 Jt~ +- 98 NN ~3 r-lO r33 J ~ +- 134 4~ 1 .25 ~ ",11' co. RD. 77 2~ 53 ~ '" I' 51 ~ ~ 0 LO 88~ ~N~ 11 ~ N N 3~ N*.... LO LON N~ J~ ~9 29 ~ 11' C>>LO LO ..... "<I" "<I" 0100 ~ 17 ~NIO J~~+-2. r52 137 ~ '" 1 l' HIGH SCHOOL 2 ~ CO-O LO COUNTRYSIDE SITE 72~ 1O~"<I" DEVELOPMENT co 0...... ....~ J~ ~B 43 ~ 11' LOO N~ "<I" ~co 0"<1".... ~ 119 ION.... C>>N J ~ ~ +- 231 1010 ~ 29 J ~ +-334 or 181 CO. RD. 79 32.,.1l 86.,.1l 1 ~z 107 ~ '" l' 203~ NOlO 72~ ......~~ . 4150 Olson Memorial Highway NEW SHAKOPEE HIGH SCHOOL EAW Figure C-7 Suite 300 WSB Minneapolis, MN 55422 ~ Ci~ofShakopee 2010 TOTAL TRAFFIC 763-5414800 &: As.socicUe3. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 SHAKO PEE Scott County, Minnesota PM PEAK IIN#:1.'J.,..'"I' ~lIr~J'J:f_"~.,lIC1I\lI~:l::-J,."''':J.']lll~'=t:..""t t'\01281'69\high school\ fig-07.dgn . co C')O C')C') C') co co- lON !'- ~ 74 306 or 34 130 ..- il' C') ..... "'1", N 0"'1" ..... .... N ------ --.- -- coo> CON "'1".... .....0 .....N NC') !~ tl' C')"'I" NO NN ro 10 CO Nro 10 ~ :c <( en 0 AM - XX PM - XX A 4150 Olson Memonal Highway NEW SHAKOPEE HIGH SCHOOL EAW Figure C-8 N Suite 300 A WSB Minneapolis, MN 55422 ~ 2010 Total Traffic 753.541-4800 City of Shako pee & Associates. Inc. FAA 753-541.1700 S.HAKOPEE Scott County, Minnesota TH 169 at CSAH 1'5 11\'1;t':1.l.......:~lr~lIJ:~:fI'..:tJrC:1I~I~:t:+.~..:j.~1fHI=l:t..~ t'\01281-69\hi9h school\fig-08.dgn ~98 or 256 CSAH 15 285-+ '" I' 122"" '<l' I'-- C')..- ..-C') co (0 ~ 12 '<l'C')(O J/ !'- +- 2 or 35 21 ~ '" 1 I' 2-+ COCOLO 12 "" ..- ~ COUNTRYSIDE COl,JNTRYSIDE DEVELOPMENT C') DEVELOPMENT ..- N'<l' .'. J/! ~4 30 "" 11' (0.(0 (") '<l' '<l' (,,)NC') ~1 (0 ~.~ ..~ 9 11 ! '- +-67 J/! \.. +- 42 N-N ~1 or2 or 50 11 \.. +- 98 1...1l 1 14 ...1l 1 co. RD. 77 1...1l 151 -+ '" I' 131 -+ '" I' 191~ "" U)NLO 0l0l1'-- 34 ..-..- 24"" ..- ~ '<l' co 0"- CXl'<l' ..I! ~ 14 15 "" 11' NLO I'-- '<l' co '<l' ..-0l0 ~30 ..-NI'-- .J!,-+-2 or 91 HIGH SCHOOL 92...1l ~ 1 I' COUNTRYSIDE SITE 2-+ OU)U) DEVELOPMENT 51 "" N ~ ..- (0 o Ol '<l'C') .Jl ~ 16 30"" tl' <b~ U) ..-0 (")1'--0 ~ 162 U)N.... (0..... J/ ! '- +- 149 '<l''<l' ~ 95 J '- +- 256 or 133 CO. RD. 79 . 102 ...1l 68 ...1l t ~Z .. 299 -+ '" I' 392 -+ 0l'<l'0 66"" co ~ ~ ... 4150 Olson Memorial Highway NEW SHAKOPEE HIGH SCHOOL EAW Figure C-9 Suite 300 WSB Minneapelis, MN 55422 ~ City of Shakopee 2025 TOTAL TRAFFIC 783.541-4800 &: Associaies./nc. FAX 763-541-1700 SllAKOPEE Scott County, Minnesota AM PEAK '1~1~:l.~""":(l["lIl:I......~tC1IJI:t:t:io.""''';J!f~'~I~I:l:f..'''' l'\01281-69\high school\ fig'09.dgn .- 358 -r 332 CSAH 15 126-+- 'f\ I' 128~ ..... 0> .....c<> .....c<> '<I" ~7 .....NCO .~.~T"'" AI~\t.+-2 -r 21 14 ~ 'f\ 1 I' 2 -+- co 10 10 9~ '<I"~"- COUNTRYSIDE COUNTRYSIDE -DEVELOPMENT 0> DEVELOPMENT '<I" 10'<1" ~.. AI~ ~3 19 .~ 11' C<>'<I" 10 N 10 N ~4 00..... ~8 NNN C")'<I"C<> JI ~ \t. .- 195, All \,.. .- 149 NN ~3 -r 10 -r 41 AI \... +- 194 4,.jC 1 31..Jl 'f\1 I' CO. RD. 77 2,.jC 77 -+- 'f\ I' 68 -+- T- co ..... 121...... C<>NC<> 11 ~ N N 4~ C<>f2"- N IO.N N'<I" JI~ ~9 29 ~ 11' ..... 10. ..... ..- U') ..... ocoo ~ 17 <')c<>co AI ~ \t., .- 2 .r 52 HIGH SCHOOL 137,.jC 'f\ 1 1'. COUNTRYSIDE SITE 2...... <Xl <Xl 10 DEVELOPMENT 72~ CO~'<I" 10 0..... .....'<1" AI~ ~8 43 ~ 11' c<>o '<I"C<> 10 CON 0>0>'<1" ~ 149 .....N..- O>N AI~ \... +- 352 coco ~ 29 AI \... +- 504 -r 280 CO. RD. 79 32~ ,.jC 10Q,.jC'f\ 11' ~z 291 ...... 155 -+ ..... 10 N 89~ ~M~ ... 4150 Olson Memonal Highway NEW SHAKOPEE HIGH SCHOOL EAW . Figure C-10 Suite 300 WSB Minneapolis. MN 55422 ~ City of Shakop~e 2025 TOTAL TRAFFIC 763.541-4600 &: Associates, Inc. FAX. 763-541.1700 SHAKOPEE Scott County, Minnesota PM PEAK 11~liI:1.'l-'"1. :urttill:i_ ....~~lCiI~I~~~+-....:.I.~'~~I~I=I~~""I l'\01281-69\high school\ fig-IO.dgn 10 om 1OC') .... N"" l"'-C') ~\.. ~ 96 335 -r 43 234 ~~. t~ 0.... ""...... C') co 10 10.... C') ---"'""--'---- --- -- NO:> l"'-1O 10.- l"'-r- ""...... C')"" t\.. tt' LOr- ...... 0:> C')N O:>l"'- "" .- C') ...... Lt) ..... :r: <( en () AM - XX PM -XX A 4150 Olson Memorial Highway NEW~SHAKOPEE HIGH SCHOOL EAW Figure C-11 N Suite 300 A WSB Minneapolis, MN 55422 ~ City of Shakopee 2025 Total Traffic 763-541-4800 &: AssociaJ~, Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 SHAKOPEE Scott County, Minnesota TH 169 at CSAH 15 .It'I:I:I.:1--..,.. :tll~lIJ;,t=mr":I\I{C1I\'t=::r:f.,."'" "':lIJ~,~m=:f.,.-' l'\01281-69\h;gh school\ I;g-n.dgn WSB & Associates, Inc. 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 . . County Road 79 & 17th Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 79th& 17thave-8-26-04am 6:00-9:00 AM Turning Movement (763) 541-4800 .Site Code : 00"000003 Shakopee, MN Start Date : 08/26/2004 August 2004 Page No : 1 Start Time . Total Int. Total Factor .06:00 AM 17 6 8 0 31 06:15AM 15 10 .25 0 50 06:30 AM 24 28 25 0 -- 77 06:45 AM 32 18 29 0 79 Total 88 62 87 0 237 07:00 A~ 0 9 13 22 25 0 3 28 ) 2 23 0 25 0 0 0 0 75 07:15AM 0 14 21 35 26 0 2 28 8 37 0 45 0 0 0 0 108 07:30 AM 0 22 19 . 41 35 0 5 40 7 33 0 40 0 0 0 0 121 07:45 AM 0 17 19 36 33 0 5 38 4 62 0 66 0 0 0 0 140 Total 0 62 72 134 119 0 15 134 21 155 0 176 0 0 0 0 444 08:00 AM 0 12 20 32 20 0 6 26 7 \ 28 o. 35 0 0 0 0 93 08:15AM 0 17 13 30 9 0 7 16 10 20 0 30 0 0 O' 0 76 08:30 AM 0 8 27 35 19 0 .3 22 4 15 0 19 0 0 0 0 76 08:45 AM 0 15 20 35 14 0 10 24 3 31 0 34 0 0 0 0 93 Total 0 52 80 132 62 0 26 88 24 94 '0 118 0 0 0 0 338 Grand Total 0 161 193 3541 238 o . 46 284-1 67 314 0 3811 0 0 0 0.: I 1019 Apprch % 0.0 45.5 54.5 83.8 0.0 16.2 17.6 82.4 0.0 37.4 . 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 - 15.8 18.9 34.7 23.4 0.0 4.5 27.9 6.6 30.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ~~'. ^ <. ,,:i WSB. & Associates, Inc. 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 . . Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 79th&17thave-8-26-04am (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000003 Start Date : 08/26/2004 Page No. :2 B~ T ~o {!. Q~j UN mS- North a -' ".'" " -'" '" a E <: O2 111- ~~ 12612004 6:00:00 AM z (5 12612004 8:45:00 AM Z8~ o- J:: Unshifled n ~. WSB & Associates, Inc. . '.. 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 . Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 79th&17thave-8~26-04am (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000003 Start Date : 08/26/2004 Page No .:3 . Total Int. Total 65 79 144 114 0 18 132 26 160 0 186 0 0 0 0 462 45.1 54.9 86.4 0.0 13.6 14.0 .. 86.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17 19 36 33 P 5 38 4 62 0 66 0 0 0 0 140 0.825 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM 5:45:00 AM 0 22 19 41 35 '0 5 40 4. 62 .0 66 0.878 0.825 0.705 ~ ~~ WSB & Associates, Inc. 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 I I :ounty Road 79 & 17th Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 79th&17thave-8-27-04pm tOO-6:00 PM Turning Movement (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000003 3hakopee, MN Start Date : 08/26/2004 !\ugust 2004 Page No : 1 Start Time . Total In!. Total Factor 03:00 PM 48 38 18 0 104 03:15 PM 60 31 26 0 117 03:30 PM 63 27 14 0 104 03:45 PM 71 28 17 0 116 Total 242 124 75 0 441 04:00 PM 0 34 33 67 25 0 4 29 4 18 . . 0 22 0 . 0 0 0 118 04:15 PM 0 36 32 68 30 0 12 42 3 27 0 30 0 0 0 0 140 04:30 PM 0 50 30 80 33 0 7 40 4. 22 0 26 0 0 0 0 146 04:45 PM 0 43 38 81 25 0 14 39 9 30 0 39 0 0 0 0 159 Total 0 163 133 296 113 0 37 150 20 97 0 117 0 0 0 0 563 05:00 PM 0 42 36 78 32 0 9 4~ 6' 28 0 34 0 0 0 0 153 05:15 PM 0 52 36 88 33 0 9 42 2 25 0 27 0 0 0 0 157 05:30 PM 0 40 36 (. 76 30 0 9 39 8 27 0 35 0 0 0 0 150 05:45 PM - 0 52 44 96' 36 0 17 53 10 28 0 38 0 0 0 0 187 Total 0 186 152 338 131 0 44 . 175 26 108 0 134 0 0 0 0 . 647 Grand Total 0 494 382 8761 332 0 117 '4~91 52 274 0 3261 0 0 0 01 1651 Apprch % 0.0 56.4 43.6 73.9 0.0 26.1 16.0 84.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 29.9 23.1 53.1 20.1 0.0 7.1 27.2 3.1 16.6 0.0 19.7 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 ~~ WSB & Associates, Inc. 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 I . Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 79th& 17thave-8-27 -04pm (763) 541-4800 Site Code :00000003 .' Start Date : 08/26/2004 Page No :2 J~ o~~ i Uw ~o . ~ S. ...J North :rw 1:l -N - 41 0 Ec O2 -l .... 111- ~-t /26/2004 3:00:00 PM t-'--'- :r ...-9' z 26/2004 5:45:00 PM . 20 ..."). 0 '" < lI> Z8~ o- s: Unshifted . n ~"'- ~~ ;:1>- .... ",or w- .~:. WSB & Associates, Inc. , . 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 . Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 79th& 17thave-8-27 -04pm '(763) .541-4800' . Site Code : 00000003 Start Date : 08/26/2004 Page No :3 . Total Int. Total 186 152 338 131 0 44 175 26 108 O. 134 0 0 0 0 647 55.0 45.0 74.9 0.0 25.1 19.4 80.6 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 52 44 96 36 0 17 53 10 28 0 38 0 0 0 0 187 0.865 05:45 PM 05:45 PM 05:45 PM 2:45:00. PM 0 52 44 96 36 0 17 53 10 28 0 38 , 0.880 0.825 0.882 ..,. WSB & Associates, Inc. 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 I . 169 NB Ramps & CSAH 15 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 16'9ramp-nb&csah 15-8-25-04pm tOO-6:00 PM Turning Movement (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000002 ;hakopee, MN Start Date \ : 08/25/2004 \ugust 2004 Page No : 1 Start Time . Total Int. Total Factor 03:00 PM 55 5 19 0 79 03:15 PM 40 5 16 0 61 03:36PM 59 11 18 0 88 03:45 PM 47 6 21 0 74 Total 201 27 74 0 302 04:00 PM 0 30 29 59 4 0 1 5 4 15 , 0 19 0 0 0 0 83 04:15 PM 0 48 27 75 2 0 2 4 4 13 0 17 0 0 0 0 96 04:30 PM 0 59 29 88 8 0 1 9 3 9. 0 12 0 0 0 0 109 04:45 PM 0 53 . 23 76 8 0 0 8 6 14 0 20 0 0 0 0 104 Total 0 190 108 298 22 0 4 26 17 51 0 68 0 0 0 0 392 05:00 PM 0 43 32 75 9 0 0 9. 4 22 0 26 0 o. 0 0 110 05:15 PM 0 41 28 69 1 0 2 3 9 15 0 24 0 0 0 0 96 05:30 PM 0 33 26 59 ) 11 0 1 12 9 20 0 29 0 0 0 0 100 05:45 PM 0 47 38 85 14 0 0 14 . 3 39 0 42 0 0 0 0 141 Total 0 164 124 288 35 0 3 38 25 96 0 121 0 0 0 0 447 Grand Total 0 473 314 7871 80 0 11 911 56 207 0 2631 0 0 0 0.: I 1141 Apprch % 0.0 60.1 39.9 87.9 0.0 12.1 21.3 78.7 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 41.5 27.5 69.0 7.0 0.0 1.0 8.0 4.9 18.1 0.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ~-, WSB.& Associates, Inc. . 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 Minneapolis; MN 55422 File Name.: 169ramp-nb&csah 15-8-25-04pm (763)541-4800 Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 08/25/2004 Page No :2 c !~ o'iiJ T U ...J North :r0> 0 ~o ~c O2-4 /25/20043:00;00 PM -l c- f-:-:f w F. /25/2004 5:45:00 PM Co 8~ 0_ .z= Unshifted r- n ~~= ~ . WSB & Associates, Inc. , 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 . Minneapolis, MN55422 File Name : 169ramp-nb&csah 15-8-25-04pm (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 08/25/2004 Page No :3 164 124 288 35 0 3 38 25 96 0 121 0 0 0 0 447 56.9 43.1 92.1 0:0 7.9 20.7 79.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 47 38 85 14 0 0 14 3 39 0 42 0 0 0 0 141 0.793 05:45 PM 05:45 PM 05:45 PM 2:45:00 PM 0 47 38 85 14 0 0 14 3 39 0 42 0.847 0.679 0.720 ~~ WSB & Associates, Inc. 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 . . 169 NB Ramps & CSAH 15 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 169ramp-nb&csah 15-8-25-04am - 3:00-9:00 AM Turning Movement (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000002 Shakopee, MN Start Date : 08/25/2004 A.ugust 2004 Page No : 1 Start Time . Total Int. Total Factor 06:00 AM 53 2 16 0 71 06:15AM 63 2 29 0 94 06:30 AM '72 3 39 0 114 06:45 AM 74 2 32 0 108 Total 262 9 116 0 387 07:00 AM 0 13 83 96 5 0 0 5 22 12 0 34 0 0 0 0 135 07.:15 AM 0 14 71 85 5 0 0 5 18 22 0 40 .0 0 0 0 130 07:30 AM 0 14 59 73 8 0 0 8 17 24 0 41 0 0 0 0 122 07:45 AM 0 11 56 67 5 0 0 5 17 23 i 0 40 0 0 0 0 112 Total 0 52 269 321 23 0 0 23 74 81 0 155 0 0 0 0 499 08:00 AM 0 9 41 50 4 0 0 4 10 14 0 24 0 0 0 0 78 08:15AM .0 18 25 43 0 0 1 1 9 9 0 18 0 0 0 0 62 08:30 AM 0 13 29 42 4 0 1 5 7 12 0 19 0 0 0 0 66 08:45 AM 0 18 31 49 5, 0 1 6 7 15 0 22 0 0 0 0 77 Total 0 58 12{i 184 13 0 3 16 33 50 0 83 0 0 0 0 283 Grand Total 0 140 627 7671 45 0 3 481 171 183 0 3541 0 0 0 0.: I 1169 Apprch % 0.0 18.3 81.7 93.8 0.0 6.3 4.1 48.3 51.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 12.0 53.6 65.6 3.8 0.0 0.3 14.6 15.7 0.0 30.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 ~ 'r WSB & Associates, Inc. , . 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 169ramp-nb&csah15-8-25-04am (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 08/25/2004 Page No :2 !~ o ~-.J T W ~o CDS- ..J North . :r'" '" ~ - Ul U1 0 CD .." O2 (-;! z .,,- F=-:--t 25/2004 6:00:00 AM -Ill w /25/2004 8:45:00 AM 20 ...::> '" III 8~ 0_ 3 .c Unshifted .- ~~~ n r!!> Co> ",0 ...s- m- ~;-~ WSB & Associates, Inc. , . 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN55422 File Name: 169ramp-nb&csah15-8-25-04am (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 0812512004 Page No :3 52 269 321 23 0 0 23 74 81 b 155 0 0 0 0 499 16.2 83.8 100.0 0.0 0.0 .47.7 52.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 83 96 5 0 0 5 22 12. 0 34 0 0 0 0 135 0.924 07:00 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 5:45:00 AM 0 13 83 96 8 0 0 8 17 24 0 41 0.836 0.719 0.945 or; ~ WSB & Associates, Inc. 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 . . ,69 SB Ramps & CSAH 15 Minneapolis, MN55422 File Name : 169ramp-sb&csah 15-8-24-04pm ~:00-6:00 PM Turning Movement (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000001 ,hakopee, MN Start Date : 08/24/2004 \ugust 2004 Page No : 1 Start Time . Total Int. Total Factor 03;00 PM 41 39 0 91 03:15 PM 41 73 0 126 03;30 PM 65 55 1 135 03:45 PM 40 64 0 125 Total 187 231 1 477 04:00 PM 0 61 6 67 53 0 17 70 1 19 0 20 0 0 1 1 158 04:15 PM 3 48 9 60 46 0 20 66 1 30 . 0 31 0 0 1 1 158 04:30 PM 0 56 8 64 61 0 22 83 0 19 0 19 1 0 0 1 167 04:45 PM 1 52 2 55 56 0 25 81 2 27 0 29 1 0 0 1 166 Total 4 217 25 246 216 0 84 300 4 95 0 99 2 0 2 4 649 05:00 PM 1 42 4 47 56_ 0 26 82 0 19 0 19 0 0 0 0 148 05:15 PM 1 39 7 47 57 1 24 82 2 19 o. 21 0 0 1 ' 1 151 05:30 PM 0 40 5 45 72 0 16 88 0 32. 0 32 0 0 0 0 165 05:45 PM 0 45 1 46 50 0 24 74 0 29 1 30 0 0 2 2 152 Total 2 166 17 185 235 1 90 326 2 99 1 102 0 0 3 3 616 Grand Total 7 542 69 6181 608 1 248 8571 7 251 1 2591 2 0 6 0.:1 1742 Apprch % 1.1 87.7 11.2 35.5 70.9 0.1 28.9 49.2 2.7 .96,9 0.4 25.0 0.0 75.0 Total % 0.4 31.1 4.0 34.9 0.1 14.2 0.4 14.4 0.1 14.9 0.1 0.0 0.3 ~;~ .. \ WSB& Associates, Inc. . 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 File Name: 169ramp-sb&csah 15-8-24-04pm Minneapolis, MN 55422 (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 08/24/2004 Page No :2 ~~ i .l!l~ o. CO~j I- "W!0l ...J North :TO co -Ol "tic: O2 -::) 10_ ~-.. /24/2004 3:00:00 PM 0 1--2 ~ a:: /24/2004 5:45:00 PM 8~ N_ .c: - Unshifted .- n .,r-l1IN ~.j>. _ Ol , WSB & Associates, Inc. . . 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 169ramp-"sb&csah15-8-24-04pm (763 )541-4800 Site Code :00000001 Start Date : 08/24/2004 Page .No :3 . Tolal Int. Tolal 217 25 246 216 0 84 300 4 95 0 99 2 0 2 4 649 88.2 10.2 72.0 0.0 28.0 4.0 96.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 56 8 64 61 0 22 83 0 19 0 19 1 0 0 1 167 0;972 04:00 PM '04:30 PM 04:15 PM 04:00 PM 0 61 6 67 61 0 22 83 1 30 0 31 0 0 1 1 0.918 0.904 0.798 1.000 't~~ WSB & Associates, Inc. ~ 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 . . 169 8'e Ramps & CSAH 15 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 169ramp-sb&csah 15-8-24-04am 3:00-9:00 AM Turning Movement (763) 541-:-4800 Site Code : 000000Q1 Shakopee, MN Start Date :08/24/2004 t\ugust 2004 Page No : 1 Start Time Int.Total Factor 06:00 AM 54 18 5 0 77 06:15 AM 59 13 14 1 87 06:30 AM 78 9 21 0 108 06:45 AM 66 24 19 0 109 Tolal 257 64 59 1 381 07:00 AM 1 90 8 99 8 0 6 14 1 16 0 17 0 0 1 1 131 07:15 AM 0 74 6 80 16 0 2 18 0 23 0 23 0 0 0 0 121 07:30 AM 0 78 5 83 19 0 5 24 1 23 0 24 0 0 0 0 131 07:45AM 0 60 3 63 19 0 5 24 1 31 0 32 0 0 0 0 119 Total 1 302 22 325 62 0 18 80 3 93 0 96 0 0 1 1 502 08:00 AM 1 45 1 47 20 0 5 25 1 15 0 16 0 0 1 1 89 08:15 AM 1 42 4 47 5 0 1 6 2 17 0 19 0 0 1 1 73 08:30 AM 0 30 3 33 9 0 2 11 0 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 58 08:45 AM 2 28 4 34 12 0 3 15 1 11 0 12 0 0 0 0 61 Tolal 4 145 12 161 46 0 11 57 4 - 57 0 61 0 0 2 2 281 Grand Tolal 7 687 49 7431 166 0 35 201\ 10 206 0 2161 1 0 3 0.: I 1164 Apprch % - 0.9 92.5 6.6 82.6 0.0 17.4 4.6 95.4 0.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 Total % 0.6 59.0 4.2 63.8 14.3 0.0 3.0 17.3 0.9 17.7 0.0 18.6 0.1 0.0 0.3 I '\ WSB & Associates, Inc. . . 4150 Olson MemorialHwy Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 169ramp-sb&csah 15-8-24-04am (763) 541-4800 Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 08/24/2004 Page No :2 E~ i {!. ... 'ti;.J'" U~ ...J North :T0l - 01 ..,. "tic: O2 -l 10_ 24/2004 6:00:00 AM 1-- :T 0 ~--. a:: 24/2004 8:45:00 AM 2 - 0 8~ ~- .c: Unshifted r- n r!p:~ ":.~ WSB & Associates, Inc. . 4150 Olson Memorial Hwy Suite 300 . Minneapolis, MN 55422 File Name : 169ramp-sb&csah 15-8-24-04am (763) 541-4800 SReCode :00000001 Start Date : 08/24/2004 Page No :3 302 22 62 0 18 80 3 93 0 96 0 0 1 1 502 92.9 6.8 - 77.5 0.0 22.5 3.1 96.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 78 5 19 0 5 24 1 23 0 24 0 0 0 0 131 0.958 07:00 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM 07:00 AM 1 90 8 99 19 0 5 - 24 1 31 0 32 0 0 1 1 0.821 0.833 0.750 0.250 , Station Name:Co.Rd 79 (N of 17thave) . Site 10:012810000690 Station Num:000000000003 . Description: City:Shakopee County: Start DatefTime:08124/04 00:00 End Date/Time:08/24/04 23:59 8/24/2004 Lane 1 (South) 00:00 39 01:00 13 02:00 11 03:00 10 04:00 11 05:00 . 87 .- . 06:00 203 07:00 430 08:00 292 09:00 204 10:00 225 11:00 281 12:00 306 13:00 314 14:00 . 334 15:00 441 16:00 561 17:00 576 .18:00 469 19:00 358 20:00 345 21:00 227 22:00 125 23:00 77 AM Peak Hour 07:00 - 07:59 AM Peak Value 430 PM Peak Hour 17:00 - 17:59 PM Peak Value 576 .- Total 5:33:3 Percentaaes 100.00% '- Printed on 27 -Aug-04 at 13: 1 0 Daily Volume Page 1 of 2 & Station Name:Co.Rd 79 (N of 17th aye) Site ID:01281 0000690 Station Num:000000000003 . Description: City:Shakopee County: Start Date/Time:08/25/04 00:00 End Daternme:08/25/04 23:59 8/25/2004 . Lane 1 (South) 00:00 49 01:00 26 02:00 15 03:00 7 04:00 22 05:00 71 f'- 06:00 246 07:00. 401 08:00 276 09:00 227 10:00 . . 240 11:00 . 306 12:00 318 13:00 296 14:00 321 15:00 464 16:00 578 17:00 616 18:00 527 19:00 454 20:00 383 21:00 214 22:00 136 .23:00 61 . AM Peak Hour 07:00 - 07:59 AM Peak Value 401 PM Peak Hour 17:00 - 17:59 PM Peak Value 616 Total 6254 Percentaaes 100.00% printed on 27 -Aug-04 at 13: 1 0 Daily Volume Page 20f 2 . Station Name:Co.Rd 79& (S of 17th ave) Site ID:012810000690 Station Num:OOOOOOOOOO04 . Description: City:Shakopee County: Start Date/Time:08/24/04 00:00 Ene! Date/Time:08/24/04 23:59 8/24/2004 Lane 1 (South) 00:00 26 01:00 12 02:00 10 03:00 . 10 04:00 . 8 05:00 53 to .~. 06:00 141 07:00 280 08:00 205 09:00 150 10:00 161 11:00 . 193 12:00 196 13:00 209 14:00 237 15:00 311 16:00 365 17:00 381 18:00 322 - 19:00 206 20:00 210 21:00 140 22:00 90 23:00 58 AM Peak Hour 07:00 - 07:59 AM Peak Value 280 PM Peak Hour 17:00 -17:59 PM Peak Value 381 Total . 3974 Percentaaes 100.00% Printed on 27-Aug-04 at 13:07 Daily Volume Page 1 of 2 Station Name:Co.Rd 79 & (S of 17th aye) ... Site 10:012810000690 Station Num:000000000004 Description: ~ City: Shakopee County: . Start Date/Time:08/25/04 00:00 End Date/Time:08/25/04 23:59 8/25/2004 Lane 1 (South) 00:00 40 01:00 17 02:00 7 03:00 8 04:00 14 05:00 38 ...:" 06:00 153 07:00 254 08:00 187 09:00 154 10:00 157 11:00 200 12:00 188 - 13:00 185 14:00 . 198 15:00 280 16:00 351 17:00 368 18:00 333 19:00 294 20:00 269 21:00 160 22:00 91 23:00 '44 . AM Peak Hour 07:00 - 07:59 AM Peak Value 254 . PM Peak Hour 17:00 - 17:59 PM Peak Value 368 _. Total 3990 Percentaaes 100.00% Printed on 27 -~ug-04 at 13:07 Daily Volume Page2 of 2 ~ Station Name:Co. Rd. 77 (between 169&128th st) Site ID:012810000690 Station Num:000000000002 - Description: City:Shakopee County: Start Date/Time:08/24/04 00:00 End DatefTime:08/24/04 23:59 8/24/2004 Lane 1 (South) 00:00 4 01:00 6 02:00 2 03:00 3 04:00 2 . - 05:00. 9 06:00 48 07:00 88 08:00 61 09:00 40 10:00 54 11:00 55 12:00 61 13:00 54 14:00 61 15:00 . 74 16:00 101 17:00 104 18:00 84 19:00 80 20:00 63 21:00 41 22:00 17 23:00 14 AM Peak Hour 07:00 - 07:59 AM Peak Value 88 PM Peak Hour 17:00 - 17:59 PM Peak Value 104 Total 1126 Percentaaes 100.00% . Printed on 27 -Aug-04 at 13: 16 Daily Volume Page 1 of 2 ~ Station Name:Co. Rd. 77 (between 169&128th st) Site ID:012810000690 Station Num:000000000002 ~ Description: City:Shakopee County: Start Date/Time:08/25/04 00:00 End Date/Time:08/25/04 23:59 8/25/2004 Lane 1 (South) 00:00 7 01:00 5 ~02:00 6 03:00 4 .04:00 2 05:00 8 ir': 06:00 45 07:00 84 08:00 64 09:00 51 10:00 34 11:00 50 12:00 57 13:00 64 14:00 53 15:00 63 16:00 103 17:00 126 18:00 89 19:00 '. 70 20:00 76 21 :00 46 22:00 29 23:00 19 AM Peak Hour 07:00 - 07:59 AM Peak Value c 84 PM Peak HoUl 17:00 - 17:59 PM Peak Value . 126 Total 1155 ) Percentaaes 100.00% Printed on 27-Aug-04 at 13:16 Daily Volume Page 20f 2 Station Name:CSAH 15 (S of 169 Ramps) . SRe1D:012810000690 Station Num:000000OOOO01 . Description: City:Shakopee Coul1ty: Start Date/Time:08/24/04 00:00 End Date/Time:08/24/04 23:59 8/24/2004 Lane 1 (South) 00:00 11 . 01:00 6 02:00 3 03:00' 6 04:00 18 05:00 61 r'- 06:00 139 07:00 190 08:00 -- 139 09:00 110 10:00 93 11:00 107 12:00 123 13:00 I 122 14:00 144 15:00 . 205 16:00 280 17:00 293 18:00 225 19:00 167 20:00 134 21:00 111 22:00 53 ~ 23:00 37 AM Peak Hour 07:00 - 07:59 AM Peak Value 190 PM Peak Hour 1'6:00.. 16:59 PM Peak Value 280 Total 2747 Percentaaes 100.00% Printed on 27 -Aug~04at 13: 13 Daily Volume Page 1 of 2 . Station Na!'1e:CSAH15(S of 169 Ramps) Site ID:012810000690 Station Num:000000000001 Description: City:Shakopee , County: Start Date/Time:08/25/04 00:00 End Date/Time:08/25/04 23:59 8/25/2004 Lane 1 (South) 00:00 19 01:00 10 02:00 5 03:00 7 04:00 14 f~' 05:00 62 06:00 149 07:00 205 08:00 149 09:00 108 10:00 85 11:00 111 12:00 142 13:00 125 14:00 163 15:00 200 16:00 268 17:00 292 18:00 237 19:00 189 20:00 155 21:00 96 22:00 59 23:00 . 22 AM Peak Hour 07:00 - 07:59 AM Peak Value 205 PM Peak Hour 17:00 - 17:59 PM Peak ValUe 292 Total 2872 Percentaaes 100.00% I Printed on 27 -Aua-04 at 13: 13 n",ih, \/nll 1m", r""\ _ ~. _ '" ,. t"\ . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Rele~se 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY - Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSBand Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: CR79 at 17th Avenue Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Existing 2004 proj ect ID-: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 79 Intersection Orientation:EW '. Study period (hr;.s) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R . Volume 15 119 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 119 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT ~hannelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbourid Southbound - -'.~.... Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 155 21 72 62 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 155 21 72 62 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared ApproacH: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 0 1 Configuration T R LT Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB ' WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I T R I LT v (vph) 15 155 21 134 C(m) (vph) 1636 739 1091 769 vlc 0.01 0.21 0.02 0.17 95% queue length 0.03 0.79 0.06 0.63 Control Delay 7.2 11.2 8.4 10.7 LOS A B A B Approach Delay 10.8 10.7 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY - Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency /Co. : WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CR 79 at 17th Avenue Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Existing 2004 Project.ID: Country Side I High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 79 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hr,s) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T. R -' Volume 44 131 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 44 131 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided I RT Channelized? No . l . Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 -I 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 108 26 152 186 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 108 26 152 186 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage I / Lanes 1 1 0 1 Configuration T R LT Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I T R I LT >- v (vph) 44 108 26 338 C (m) (vph) 1636 665 1091 735 vlc 0.03 0.16 0.02 0~46 95% queue length 0.08 0.58 0.07 2.43 Control Delay 7.3 11. 5 8.4 14.0 LOS A B A B Approach Delay 10.9 14.0 Approach LOS B B . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.ld TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 No Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S.Customary Analysis Year: Existing 2004 Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/We~tStreet: TH 169 No Ramp North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS study period (hr.s) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T . R I L T R . , .- Volume 93 3 22 302 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 93 3 22 302 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 18 62 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1.00. Hourly Flow Rate, , HFR 18 62 Percent HeavyVehicle~ 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared.Approach: Exists? /S.torage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue, Length, and Level of &ervice Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound. Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 22 18 62 C(m) (vph) 1510 674 1020 v/c 0.01 0.03 0.06 95% queue length 0.04 0.08 0.19 Control'Delay 7.4 10.5 8.8 LOS A B A Approach Delay 9.1 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 No" Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Existing 2004 Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: TH 169 No Ramp North/South Street: CSAH15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hr.s) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Move;ment 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 95 4 25 217 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 95 4 25 217 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I. L T R Volume 84 21,6 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 84 216 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared ApprOach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 . Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length~ and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 '7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT 1 L R I v (vph) 25 84 216 C (m) (vph) 1507 707 1,017 vlc 0.02 0.12 0.21 r 0.05 0.40 95% queue length 0,.80 Control Delay 7.4 10.8 9.5 LOS A B A Approach Delay 9.9 Approach LOS A . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co. : WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 So Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Clistomary Analysis Year: Existing 2004 ProjectID: Country Side'/ High SchbOl EAW East/West Street: TH 169 So Ramp North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrS) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound' Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 81 74 269 52 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 81 74 . 269 52 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / .RT Channelized? No La,nes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No \ Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 .9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 23 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Gr:ade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / I Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 1,0 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v' (vph) 269 1 23 C (m) (vph) 1438 332 1029 v/c 0'.19 0.00 0.02 95% queue length 0.69 0.01 0.07 Control Delay 8.1 15.9 8.6 LOS A C A Approach Delay 8.9 . Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ,; Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time P~riod: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 So Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Existing 2004 ProjectID: Country Side I High School EAW East/West Street: TH 169 So Ramp North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hro$) : O.2~ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: . Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6, L T R '1 L T R . Volume 51 17 190 108 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1.'00 1. QO 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, ,HFR 51 17 190 108 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- MedianType/Storag~ Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 4 22 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade ( % ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 190 4 22 C (m) (vph) 1546 453 1050 v/c 0.12 0.01 0.02 95% queu~ length 0.42 0.03 0.06 Control Delay 7.7- J3.0 8.5 LOS A B A Approach Delay 9.2 Approach LOS A - HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ~ Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: CR 79 at 17th Avenue Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analys1.s Year: 2010 Full Build' Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 79 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (h~6) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major 'Street: Approach 'Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 1 T R I 1 T R Volume 88 231 49 79 282 142 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 88 231 49 79 282 142 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration 1 T R 1 T R UBstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 1 T R I L T R Volume 49 198 52 86 108 133 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 . 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rat'e, HFR 49 198 52 86 108 133 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R 1 T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement ,I 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L 1 I 1 T R I 1 T R v (vph) 88 79 49 198 52 86 108 133 C (m) (vph) 1146 1294 256 299 921 202 334 888 v/c 0.08 0.06 0.19 0.66 0.06 _0.43 0.32 0.15 95% queue length 0.25 0.19 0.69 4.37 0.18 1. 96 1. 37 0.53 Control Delay 8.4 8.0 22.4 37.8 9.1 35.4 20.8 9.8 LOS A A C E A E C A Approach Delay 30.3 20.2 Approach LOS D C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d '"'" TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY " Analyst: Chuck RickartC Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date PerfQrmed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CR 79 at 17th Avenue Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 79 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hr-s) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major,Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 118 243 60 72 250 156 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 118 243 60 72 250 156 Percent Heavy Vehicl~s O. -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L' T R Volume 86 107 72 181 231 119 Peak Hour Factor,PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 86 107 72 181 231 119' Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration . L T R L T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 . 9 I 10 11 12 . Lane Config L L I L T R I L T R v (vph) 118 72 86 107 72 181 231 119 C (m) (vph) 1164 1269 148 282 913 249 313 909 v/c 0.10 0.06 0.58 0.18 0.08 0.73 0.74 0.13 95% queue length 0.34 0.18 3.00 1. 70 0.26 5.02 5.50 0.45 Control Delay 8.4 8.0 58.5 25.4 9.3 50.2 43.0 /9.6 LOS A A F D A F E A Approach Delay 31. 8 38.0 Approach LOS D E - HCS2000: Unsignalizedlntersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY - Analyst: Chuck Rickart.' Agericy/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at HS Entrance Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: HS Entrance Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 20 236 118 210 245', 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 236 118 210 245 15 Percent. Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 92 2 51 91 2 30 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 ~ourly Flow Rate, HFR 92 2 51 91 2 30 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent G,rade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT R I LTR v (vph), 20 210 94 51 123 C(m) (vph) 1316 1216 309 918 341 v/c . 0.02 0.1 0.30 0.06 0.36 95% queue length' 0.05 0.6 1. 25 0.18 1.60 Control Delay 7.8 8.6 21.7 9.2 21.4 LOS A A C A C Approach Delay 17.3 21. 4 Approach LOS C ' C HCS2000: Uns~gnalized Intersect~ons Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY - Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency ICo. : WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at HSEntrance Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S~ Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: HS Entrance Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hr-s) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 60 264 30 68 320 45 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 60 264 30 68 320 45 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 -1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 1 L T R I L T R Volume 137 2 72 52 2 17 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 137 2 72 52 2 17 percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) , . 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage /, No / Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I - 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT R I LTR v (vph) 60 68 ' 139 72 71 C (m) (vph) 1205 1279 405, 899 434 'v/c, 0.05 0.05 0.34 0.08 0.16 95% queue length 0.16 0.17 1.50 0.26 0.58 Control Delay 8.1 8.0 18.5 9.4 14.9 LOS A A C A B Approach Delay 15.4 14.9 Approach LOS C B . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at CR 77 JUl::isdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build proj ect ID: Country Side / High .SchoolEAW- East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 77 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hps) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eas.tbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R . Volume 9 378 4 15 325 36 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 378 4 15 325 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuratio~ L T F, L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 12 88 17 44 28 7 Peak Hour Factor,. PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 88 17 44 28 7 _ Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Delay, Queue Length, and .~,evel of Service Approach EB WB Northbound ' Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L T R I t T R v (vph) 9 15 12 88 17 44 28 7 C (ni) (vph) 1209 1188 461 418 827 422 427 861 v/c. 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.21 0.02 0.10 0.07 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 0.04 0.08 0.79 0.06 0.35 0.21 0.02 Control Delay 8.0 8.1 13.0 15.9 9.4 14.5 14.0 9.2 LOS A A ,B C A B B .A Approach Delay 14.7 13.9 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSBand Associates Inc Da'te ,Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at CR 77 Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U.S. Customary Analysis Year: ," 2010 Full Build Project. 1,0: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 77 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hr<$) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 24 314 21 23 430 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 24 314 21 ' 23 430 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised'curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R --- Volume 25 51 3 33 98 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 25 51 3 33 98 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane COrifig L L I L T R I L T R v (vph) 24 23 25 51 3 33 98 5 C (m) (vph) 1126 1236 379 386 867 396 387 796 v/c 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.13 . 0.00 0.08 0.25 0.01 95% queue length 0.07 0.06 0.21 0.45 0.01 0.27 0.99 0.02 Control Delay 8.3 8.0 15.2 15.7 9.2 14.9 17.4 9.6 LOS A A C C A B C A Approach Delay 15.3 16.5 Approach LOS C C - HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency ICo . : WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at Dev. Entrance Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: Development Entrance Intersection Orientation: EW. Study period (hr-s) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 6 316 4 18 319 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 316 4 18 319 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 - 12 'L T R I L T R Volume 21 2 12 35 2 12 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 2 12 35 2 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent GrSl;de (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 6 18 35 49 C(m) (vph) 1247 1251 594 562 v/c 0.00 0.01 0.06 0-.09 95% queue length 0.01 0.04 0.19 0.29 Control Delay 7.9 7.9 11. 4 12.0 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 11.'4 12.0 Approach LOS B B . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d - - TWO-WAY'STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at Dev. Entrance ' . Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: u. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project ID: Country Side I HighSchooi EAW East/West street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: neve~opment Entrance Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hr.s) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments , Maj or' Street: Approach Eastbound - Westbound MoveII\ent 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 18 315 17 46 378 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 0 0- 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 315 17 46 378 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median~ype/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? 'No No Minor Street: Approach' Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 14 2 9 21 2 7 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00_ 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 2 9 21 2 7 Percent Beavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: ,Exists? /Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 18 46 25 30 C (m) (vph) 1177 1239 538 473 v/c 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.06 95% queue length 0.05 0.12 0.15 0.20 Control Delay 8.1 8.0 12.0 13.1 LOS A A B ' B Approach Delay ,12.0 13.1 Approach LOS B B . HCS2000: Unsignal~zed Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Ghuck Rickart Agency/Co. : WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM' Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at CSAH 15 Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High Scho.ol EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CSA.H 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hr'S) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach No.rthbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 184 106 220 63 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 184 106 220 63 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided I RT Channelized? No. Lanes 1 1 0 1 Configuration T R LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 109 243 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 109 243 Perc~nt Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach:' Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Appro.ach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 220 109 243 C(m) (vph) 1283 345 864 vlc 0.17 0.32 0.28 95% queue length 0.62 1. 33 1.16 . Control Delay 8.4 20.2 10.8 LOS A .C B Approach Delay 13.7 Appro.ach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY - Analyst: Chuck Rickart, Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour , _ Intersection: 17th Avenue at CSAH 15 Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 ,Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue ,North/South Street: CSAH15 Intersection Orientation: NS -Study period (hr-s) :. 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound -SouthboUnd Movement 1 2 3 j 4 5 6 L T R I L "T R , - Volume 81 100 250 231 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 81 100 250 231 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Med~an Ty~e/storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 0 1 Configuration T R LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 136 263 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 136 263 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length~ and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9' I 10 11 12 Lane Conf ig . LT I L R I v (vph) 250 136 263 C(m) (vph) 1407 289 985 v/c 0.18 0.47 0.27 95% queue length 0.65 2.37 1. 08 Control Delay 8.1 28.1 10.0- LOS A D A ,Approach Delay 16.1 Approach LOS C - HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency / Co. : WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 . Analysis Time period: AM Peak Hour ,Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 No Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build proj ect. ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: TH169 No Ramp North/South 'Street: CSAH 15 Intersection ,Orientation: NS Study period (hr-s) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments. Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 243 7 26. 563 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 LOO' 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 243 7 26 563 Percent Reavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1. 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal?" No No Minor street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 34 74 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 34 74 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: EXists?!Storage / / Lanes 1 1 ~ Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 26 34 74 C (m) (vph) 1327 444 913 v/c 0.02 0.08 0.08 95% queue length 0.06 0.25 0.26 Control Delay 7.8 13.8 9.3 LOS A B A Approach Delay 10.7 Approach LOS '8) HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d ,;, TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY - Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/co. : WSB arid Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 NO,Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Prbject ID: Country Sipe / High School EAW East/West street: TH 169 No Ramp North/South Street: CSAH 15 . Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach . Northbound Southbound. Movement 1 2 3 ~ I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 270 14 30 336 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 270 14 30 336 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstre~m Signal? No No, Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ,I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume' 130 306 Peak Hour Fact6r, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 130 306 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared'Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and,Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 30 130 306 C(m) (vph) 1290 495 895 v/c 0.02, 0.26 0.34 95% queue length 0.07 1. 04 1. 53 Control Delay 7.9 14.,8 11.1 LOS 'A B B Approach Delay 12.2 Approach LOS B . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency /Co. : WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH15 at TH 169 So Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Cu.stomary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: TH 169 So Ramp North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hI's) : 0.25 r Vehicle.Volumes.and Adjustments Maj or Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 223 _204 320 277 Pe~k-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 223 204 320 277 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement, 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 6 27 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 27 , Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage F / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 320 6 27 C(m) (vph) 1143 175 926 v/c 0.28 0.03 0.03 95% queue length 1.15 0.11 0.09 Control Delay 9.4 26.3 9.0 LOS A D A Approach Delay 12.1 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 AnalysiS Time period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 So Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. s. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Full Build Project 10: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: TH 169 So Ramp Nor~h/South Street: CSAH ~5 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hra) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 258 86 129 466 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 258 86 129 466 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 15 26 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 26 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/St;orage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R J ' V. (vph) 129 15 26 C(m) (vph) 1226 315 903 v/c 0.11 0.05 0.03 95% queue length 0.35 0.15 0.09 Control Delay 8.3 17.0 9.1 LOS A C A Approach Delay 12.0 Approach LOS. B .. HCS2000: Unsignalized Interiections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ~ Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency /Co. : WBBand Assoc~ates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: CR 79 at 17th Avenue Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. . S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build . proj ectID: Country Side / High Scho,ol EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 79 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Ma'j or Street: Approach Eantbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 ,L T R I L T R Volume 100 271 53 89 344 220 Peak~Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 100 271 53 89 . 344 220 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? ' No No Lanes 1 ,2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T, R I L T R Volume 68 299 66 133 149 162 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 68 299 66 133 149 162 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0, 0 Percent Grade (% ) O. 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / I Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Con fig L L I L T R I L T R v (vph) 100 89 68 299 66 133. 149 162 C (m) (vph) 1018 1247 168 232 894 73 286 848 v/c 0.10 _0.07 0.40 1.29 0.07 1. 82 0.52 0.19 95% queue length 0.33 0.23 1. 79 15.57 0.24 11.75 2.80 0.70 Control Delay 8.9 8.1 40.3 200.5 9.3 512.4 30.5 10.2 LOS A' A E F A F D B Approach Delay 146.2 167.5 Approach LOS F F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d " TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CR 79 at 17th Avenue Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High Schoql EAW East/West Stre~t: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 79 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hr6) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 142 296 79 101 315 242 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 142 296 79 101 315 242 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T' R Volume 11,0 155 89 280 352 149 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1..00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 110 155 89 280 352 149 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/StOrage / / Lanes I, 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Sou,thbound 1 4 I 7 8 9 I '"" Movement 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L T R I L T R v' (vph) 142 101 110 155 89 280 352 149 C(m) (vph) 1024 1195 0 190 878 123 232 866 v/c 0.14 0.08 0.82 0.10 2.28 1. 52 0.17 _95% queue length 0.48 0.28 5.74 0.34 24.00 21.22 0.62 Control Delay 9.1 8.3 75.6 9.6 656.8 292.3 10.0+ LOS A A F F A F F B Approach Delay 369.1 Approach LOS F ~, HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Rel~ase 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ~ Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: , 17th Avenue at HS Entrance Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units:U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: HS Entrance Ihtersection Orientation:EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound MOvement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 20 294 118 210 355 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 Hourly.~low Rate, HFR 20 294 118 210 355 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb I \1 RTChannelized? -No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 92 2 51 91 2 30 Peak Hour Factor,' PHF 1.00 1. 00 1.'00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 92 2 51 91 2 30 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 perceJ:lt Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / ,Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config' L L I LT R I LTR v (vph) 20 210 94 51 123 C(m) (vph) 1200 1158 274 880 290 vlc 0.02 0.18 0.34 0.06 0.42 95% queue len~th 0.05 0.66 1. 47 0.18 2,.02 Control Delay 8.1 8.8 24.8 9.3 ' 26.3 LOS A A C A D Approach Delay 19.4 26.3 Approach LOS C D HCS2000: Unsignalized IntetsectionsRelease 4.1d ~ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY - Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co. : WSB and Associates Inc Da.te Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at HS Entrance Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build Project ID: Count.ry Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: HS Ent,rance Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hr.s) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R -I L T R Volume 60 361 30 68 438 45 . Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 60 361 30 68 438 45 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 137 2 72 52 2 17 Peak Hour'Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 137 2 72 52 2 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Length, and'Level of Service Approach EE WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT R I LTR v (vph) 60 68 139 72 71 C (m) (vph) 1090 1179 343 838 366 v/c 0.06 0.06 0.41 0.,09 0.19 95% queue length 0.17 0.18, 1. 90 0.28 0.71 Control Delay 8.5 8.2 22.5 9.7 17.2 LOS A A . C A C Approach Delay 18.1 17.2 Approach LOS C C ~ HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co. : WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM, Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at CR77 Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build Project iD:Country Side / H~gh School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CR 77 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hr's) : 0.25 Vehi<;:le Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L .T R I L T R Volume 13 424 6 19 419 47 Peak-Hour Factor, 2HF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00. 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 424 6 19 419 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- a -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1- 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 14 131 24 50 42 9 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 ,1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 131 24 50 42 9 Percent Heavy Veh~cles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( % ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists,? /Storage / I Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Delay, Que,ue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L T R I L T R v (vph) 13 19 14 131 24 50 42 9 C(m) (vph) 1106 1140 399 364 800 328 375 802 v/c 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.36 0.03 0.15 0.11 0.01 95% queue length 0;04 0.05 0.11 1. 60 0.09 0.53 0.38 0.03 Control Delay 8.3 8.2 14.4 20.3 9.6 17.9 15.8 9.5 LOS A A B C A C C A Approa'ch Delay 18.3 16.3 Approach LOS C C HCS2000: Unsignalized Inte~sections ~elease 4.1d ~ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY - Analyst: Chuck Rickart. Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at CR 77 Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary 'Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build proj ect ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North!South Street: CR 77 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period~(hril) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 37 402 30 31 538 17 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 37 402 30 31 538 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal?' No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 31 68 4 41 149 8 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1. 00 .1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 68 4 41 149 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 .- Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 {'->,' Flared ..Approach: Exists?/Storage, / / Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach E13 WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I TO 11 12 Lane Config L L I L T R I L T R v (vph) 37 31 31 68 4 41 149 8 C (m) (vph) 1026 1138 258 310 813 306 313 735 v/c 0.04 0.03 0.12 0.22 0.00 0.13 0.48 0.01 95% queue length 0.11 0.08 0.40 0.82 0.01 0.46 2.44 0.03 Control Delay 8.6 8.3 20.8 19.8 9.4 18.6 26.5 10.0- LOS A A C C A C D A Approach Delay 19.7 24.2 Approach LOS' C C ~ HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersect~ons Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates .Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at Dev. Entrance Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build Project ID: Country Side j High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: Development Entrance Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Maj or Stree.t: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement I 2 3' I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 6 368 4 18 418 5 Peak-Hour Factor,PHE 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 368 4 18 418 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound. Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 21 2 12 35 2 12 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 2 12 35 2 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade._ (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 6 18 35 49 C(m) (vph) 1147- 1198 541 493 v/c 0~01 0.02 0.06 0.10 95% queue length 0.02 .0.05 0.21 0.33 Control Delay 8.2 8.1 12.1 13.1 LOS Pi A B B Approach Delay 12.1 13.1' Approach LOS B -B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d ~ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY - Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co. : WSB and AssociatesInc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at Dev. Entrance .Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build ProjectID: Country Sid~ / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: Development Entrance Intersection Orientati~n: EW Study period- (hr-s) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 ,3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 18 424 17 46 495 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, ,HFR 18 424 17 46 495 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9- 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 14 2 9 21 2 7 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 2 ~ 9 21 2 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade. (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 18 46 25 30 C (m) (vph) 1065 1130 462 398 v/c 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.08 95% queue length 0.05 0.13 0.17 0.24 Control Delay 8.4 8.3 13.2 14.8 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 13.2 14.8 Approach LOS B B ~ HCS2000: Uns~gnalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th.Avenue at CSAH 15 Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary 'Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High School.EAW East/West Street,: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hr-s) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T' R Volume 285 122 256 78 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 285 122 256 78 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 0 1 Configuration T R LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 134 317 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR ,~ 134 317 'Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent GFade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue. Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 256 134 317 C'(m) (vph) 1163 251 759 vlc 0.22 0.53 0.42 95% queue length 0.84 2.87 2.07 Control Delay 9.0 34.7 13.1 LOS A D B Approach Delay 19.5 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d ~ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY - Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co. : WSB and Associates .rnc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis ~ime Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 17th Avenue at CSAH 15 Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S.' Cus tomary, Analysis Year: 2025 full Build Project ID: ,Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: 17th Avenue North/South Street: CSAH 15 Inte~section Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Maj or Street:. Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 .L T R I L T R Volume 126 128 332 358 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 126 128 332 358 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided I RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 0 1 Configuration T R LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor _Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound ,~ Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 177 339 Peak Hour .Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 177 339 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0- 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage I I Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config' LT I L R I v (vph) 332 177 339 C (m) (vph) 1323 166 930 vlc 0.25 1. 07 0.36 95% queue length 1. 00 8.86 1. 68 Control Delay 8.6 144.7 11.1 LOS A F B ,Approach Delay 56.9 Approach LOS F . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY - Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH15 at TH169 No Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary AnalyslsYear: 2025 Full Build Project ID: Country Side / High School EAW East/West Street: TH 169,No Ramp North/South~treet: CSAH15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hr~) : 0.25 " Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T' R I L T R Volume 340 11 34 721 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 340 11 34 721 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 43 96 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 -, Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 43 96 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade ( % ) 0' 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage I I Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 34 43 96 C(m) (vph) 1219 332 851 vlc 0.03 0.13 0.11 95% queue length 0.09 0.44 0.38 Control Delay 8.0 17.5 9.8 LOS A C A Approach Delay 12.1 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d . TWO-WAY STOP ~ONTROL SUMMARY - Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency/Co.: WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/ 1/ 2 0 0 4 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 No Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build Project ID: Country" Side / High School EAW East/West Street: TH- 169 No Ramp North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6. L T R I L T R Volum-e 366 16 39 606 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 366 16 39 606 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T. R Volume 234 335 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 234 335 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1. 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12. Lane Configc LT I L R I v'(vph) 39 234 335 C (m) (vph) 1188 341 834 v/c 0.03 0.69 0.40 95% queue length 0..10 4.82 1. 95 Control Delay 8.1 35.8 12.2 LOS A E B Approach Delay 21.9 Approach LOS C L HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d ~ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency ICo.: WSB and Associates lnc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 So Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025 Full Build project ID: Country Side I High School EAW East/WestStreet: TH 169 So Ramp North/South Street: .CSAH 15 Interse~tion Orientation: ,- NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2' 3 I 4 5 6 L T, R I L T R Volume 315 287 417 347 Peak~Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 315 287 417 347 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- '-- Median Type/Storage Undivided I RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T- R I L T R Volume 7 36 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage I I Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level ~f Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I . v (vph) 417 7 36 C (m) (vph) 985 86 866 vie 0.42 0.08 0.04 95% queue ~ength 2.14 0.26 0.13 Control Delay 11. 3 50.5 9.3 LOS B F A Approach Delay 16.0 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.ld . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY - Analyst: Chuck Rickart Agency /Co. : WSB and Associates Inc Date Performed: 9/1/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CSAH 15 at TH 169 So Ramp Jurisdiction: Shakopee Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2025 Fuli Build ProjectID: Couritr'y Side/ High School EAW, East/West Street: TH 169.So Ramp North/South Street: CSAH 15 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 348 117 168 672 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 348 117 168 672 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 '0 2 Configuration T R LT T Upstream Signal?' No No Minor 'Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 18 34 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1. 00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (% ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists? /Sto,;rage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R -Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R' I v (vph) 168 18 34 C (m) (vph) 1107 200 846 v/e 0.15 0.09 0.04 95% queue length 0.53 0.29 0.13 Control Delay 8.8 24.8 9.4 LOS PI. C A Approach Delay 14.7 Approach LOS B . . " APPENDIX D Department of Natural Resources Letter, State HistoricalPreserVation Office Letter, and Prime Agricultural Soils Map ~ IUI-G,c; - MinneSqtir1uQffJJ~tm~;QtaQfRN~bW;6Mal,{Gd9prCeS 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul. Minnesota55155-40 Phone: (651) 296-7863 Fax: (651) 296-1811 E-mail: sarah.hoffmann@dnr.state.mn.us o~n.J"'~~\:;-- ;" .~ ~,::~ t', ~ .J 'f"" ~ j ~Ii.,', 'J..J""",.. "".-~..... August 13, 2004 AUG ! 6 ,~..4 Ryan Hughes WSB & ASSQCIATES WSB' & Associates, Inc. 4150 Olson Memorial Highway .' Mmneapolis,:MN 55422 Re: Request for Natural Heritage information for vicinity of proposed Countryside Residential Development, T115N R23W Section 13, Scott County , NHNRP Contact #: ERDB 20050113 Dear Mr. Hughes, The Minnesota Natural Heritage database has been reviewed to determine if any rare plant or animal species or other significant natural features are known to occur within an approximate one-miie radius of the area indicated on the map enclosed with your information request. Based on this review, there are no known occurrences of rare species or natural communities in the area searched. The Natural Heritage database is maintained by the NaturalHeritage and Nongame Research Program, a unit within the Division of Ecological Services, Department of Natural Resources. It is continually updated as new information becomes avaiblble, and is the most complete source of data on Minnesota's rare or otherwise significant species, natural communities, and other natural features. Its purpose is to foster better understanding and protection of these features. , Because our information is not based on a comprehensive inventory, there may be rare or otherwise significant natural features in the state that are not represented in the database. A county-by" county surveyof rare natural features is now underway, and has been completed for Scott County. Our information about natural communities is, therefore, quite thorough for that county. ' However, because survey work for rare plants and animals is less exhaustive, and because there has not been an on-site survey of all areas of the county, ecologically significant features for which we have no records may exist on the project area. Please be aware that review by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program focuses only on rare natural features. It does not constitute review or approval by the Department of Natural Resources as a whole. If you require further information on the environmental review'process for other wildlife- related issues, you may contact your Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist, Wayne Barstad, at (651)772-7940. An invoice for the work completed will be mailed to you under separate cover within two weeks of the date of this letter. You are being billed for map and database search and staff scientist review. Thank you for consulting us, on this matter, and for your interest in preserving Minnesota's rare natural resources. ~~~~(~ Sarah D. Hoffmann . Endangered Species Environmental Review Coordinator DNR Information: 651-296-6157 . 1-888-646-6367 . ITY: 651-296-5484 . 1-800-657-3929 An Equal Oppoltunity Employer ft: Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a \.~ Minimum of IO'if- Post-Consumer Waste . Page 10f2 B.yan Hughes From: Cinadr, Thomas [thomas.cinadr@mnhs.org] Sent: Tuesday, August03, 2004 10:44 AM To: Ryan Hughes Subject: HE: Information Request No archaeological sites or standing structures were identified in a search of the Minnesota SHPa cultural resource databases for the requested search. A list of historic structures for the search area is attached. -./" The result of this database search provides a listing of recorded archaeological sites and,. historic architectural properties that are included in the current SHPa databases. Because the majority of archaeological sites in the state and many historic architectural properties have not been recorded, important sites or,structures may exist within the search area and may be affected by development projects within that area. Additional research,inc1uding field survey, may be necessary to adequately assess the area's,potential to.contain historic properties. Wi.th regard to Environmental Assessment Worksheets (EA W), a negative known site/structure response from the SHPO databases is not necessarily appropriate information on which to base a "No" response to EA W Question 25a. It is the Responsible Governinenta1Unit's (RGD) obligation to verify the accuracy of the information contained within the EAW. A "Noll response to Question 25a without written justification should be carefully considered. If you require a comprehensive assessment of a project's potential to impact archaeological sites or historic architectural properties, you may need to hire a qualified archaeologist and/or historian. Please contactthe SHPa by phone at 651-296-5434 or by email at mnshI2Q@mnhs.org for current lists of professional consultants in these fields. Tom Cinadr Survey and Information Management Coordinator Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office Minnesota Historical Society 345 Kellogg Blvd. West st. Paul, MN 55102 651-205-4197 (voice) 651..282-2374 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: Ryan Hughes [mailto:RHughes@wsbeng.com] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 12:33 PM To: Cinadr, Thomas Cc: Andrea Moffatt Subject: Information Request Hello Mr. Cinadr, Attached, is a letter to request a historical, archeological, and architectural review for a site in the City of Shakopee as well as an aerial photo and USGS map to aid in your research. Please forward any information you have concerning this site as soon as possible. If you have any questions feel free to erriail or call me at the number below. - Thank you. .... ,,. ,-""" i , ""., History/Architecture Inventory PROPERTY NAME ADDRESS Twp Range Sec Quarters USGS Report NRHP CEF DOE Inventory Number COUNTY: Scott CITY/TOWNSHIP: Jackson Twp. . farmstead off Co. Hwy. 15 115 23 13, SW-SW-SW Shakopee SC-79-lH SC-JAC-005 . Tuesday, August 03,2004 Page 1 of 1 N W+E . 0 500 1,000 2,000 WSB Feet S ~ ------ ,. - ~ .' APPENDIX E Water Resource Information ~ DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ,. St. Paul District Corps of Engineers 190 Fifth Street East ~ St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1683 " REPLY TO ATIENTION OF: September 27, 2004 -< Construction-Qperations Regulatory (MVP-2004-159650-JKA) Mr. James Arndt Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. 1355 Mendota Heights Road, Suite 100 Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120-1112 " Dear Mr. . Arndt: We have reviewed your October 9,2003,. wetland delineation report, your July 2004 Addendum, and your September 24, 2004 Memorandum regarding the Shakopee High School site. The delineation site is in the S ~ of the NE ~ and the NW X of the SE X of Sec. 13, T. IISN. , R. 23W. , Scott County, Minnesota. Work proposed at the location stated is not within the regulatory jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers. No work will be done in a navigable water of the United States, and no dredged or fill material, including that incidental to mechanical land clearing, will be, dischClrged in any water of thE;l United States, including wetlands. Therefore, a Department of the Army permit is riot required to do this wOrk. This letter is valid only for ,the proj ect referenced above. If any change in design; location, or purpose is contemplated, contact this office to avoid doihgwork that may be in violation i of Federal law. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS CQNFIRMATION LETTER DOES I NOT ELIMI~ATE THE NEED FOR STATE, LOCAL, OR OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS, 'j SUCH AS THOSE: OF THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES OR COUNTY. The decision regarding th:LsacEi6n iabas'ed on information 1 I, fOlind in the administrative record which documents the District! s i I decision-making process, the basis for the decision, and the I I i final decision. j I i If you have any questions [ contact Jon K. Ah1ness in our St. I I Paul office at ( 651) 290-5381. IIi any correspondence 'or inquiries, please refer CO the Regulatory number shown above. Sincerely, i i / ~f~ j 1 j I -r', obert J, Whiting Chief, Regulatory Branch ~ I Copy furnished to: Peter Beckius1 Scott SWCD .... ....--_.."'''~---_......_.._..__......._...__.... ...... . ..... ,"' v....,. ,l""J..11,1J] _VJp~ V.k. L...U,2;5uu;c:.s:> , .. DISTRICT OFFICE: St. Paul District ~ FILE NUMBER: MVP-2004-159650-JKA ~ PROJECT LOCATION IN FORMA nON: ~ State: .Minnesota County: Scott Center coordinates of site (latitude/longitude): Lat: 44.7704225462126 Lon: -93.5254410111388 Approximate size of area (parcel) reviewed, including uplands: 97 acres. Name of nearest waterway: Unnamed Tributary Name of watershed: Minnesota 'Rjyer JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Completed: Desktop detem1ination fI Date: September 27, 2004 Site visit(s) II Date(s): ~. ,,,. . Jurisdictional Determination (JD): 11 Preliminary 10 - Based on available infom1ation,O there appear to be (or) 0 there appear to be no "waters oftbe United Stlites"and/or "navigable \Vaters of the United States"oil the project site. A preliminary 10 is not appealable (Reference 33 CFR par:t 331). .' iiApproved JD - An appr~ved JDisan appealable action (Reference 33 CFR part 331). CheCK all thafapply: ' lIThere are "navigaJle waters of tile United States" (as dc'tined by 33 CPR part 329 and associated guidance) within the reviewed area. Approximate size of jurisdictional area: ' fiiThere are "waters of the United States" (as deilned by 33 CFR part 328 and associated guidanc,e) wjthintlle reviewed area. Approximate size of jurisdictional area: 0 acres !i1r)lere are "isolated, non-navigable, intrd-staf.e waters or wetlands" wiihin the reviewed area. I!l!Decision sllPP0l1ed by SW ANCC/Migratory Bird, Rule Information Sheet for Dcterniination of No Jurisdiction. BASIS OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINA TlON: A~ Waters defined under 33 CFR part 329 as "navigable \\,aters oftbe United States": Ii The presence of waters that-ate subject tathe ebb and flow ofthetide andlot ate presently used, or have been used in , the past, Of may be susceptible for use to transportinterstate or foreign commerce. B. Waters deuned under 33 (;FR part 328.3(a) as "waters oUhe United States": III (1) The presence of waters, which are cllrrently used, or Were used in the PilSt, or niay be susceptible to usein interstate or foreign C0rru11erce, including all ,.vatetswhicb arc subject to the ebb and flow of the tide. II (2) The presence of interstate Waters. including interstate wetlands I. , ' .(3) The presepce of other waters such as intraslate I;ll<.es, rivers,strearr.is (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats. , . wetlands; sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds, the use, degradation or destruction of which eouid aff~ct interstate commerce including any such waters (check all that apply): D 0) which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelerS for recreational or .oth,er purposes. o (Ii) from \.vhichfish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign COmmerce. o (Hi) which are orcouJd be used'f(willdI,lSJrialpurpose~by indu~esini:rilerstateCQmmerce.. . 111(4) Impoundments of waters othel'\\4se defined as Waters of the US. lli (5) The presence of a tributary to a wilter Identified in (1)-(4) above. II (6) The presence ofterritorial seils. I! (7) The presence of wetlands adjacenr to other waters of the US, except for those wedandsadjacent to other wetlands. Rationa.lefor the Basis of .Jut'isdiction'a~ Dctcrmin>>tion (applies to any boxes checked above). lfthe)urisdictio/Jal,watel' or ~vetldndis (lot itself a navigable water of the United States, describe connectlon(s) to ihe dow.nstream navigable waters. If E(l) or B(3) is usedqsthe Basis of Jurisdiction, docl!ni.mtnavigability and/or imerstate coinnlerce comieczion (i.e., discuss site conditions, including why the waterbody is navigable and/or how the destnlction o[lhe waferbody COllldaffiet interstate orforcign commerce). If B(2, 4. 5. or 6) is used (IS the ~asis ofJUJisdiction, document the rationale used to make the determination. If B(7) is used as the Basis ofJwisdictioll, document the rationale used to make adjacency determination: .... ....... h ...~ .. . .........~.._..~._. .........................__, .......n...... ". ...... ......... ...._..... ........_........." ""H__'_" ... ................__.___,_.._..._...... .....n .._...._.....__....__......_..__..........._......_.........._........... . 2 Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction: (Reference: 33 CPR parts 328 and 329) !" I! Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: 11 High Tide Line indicated by: ~ 0 clear, natural line impressed on the bank 0 oil or scum line alol')g shore objects - 0 the presence of litter and debris 0 nne sh~ll or debris deposits (foreshore) ~ 0 changes in the character of soH 0 physical markings/characteristics .0 destruction of terrestrial vegetlltion 0 tidal gages o shelving 0 other: o other: II Mean HighWater Mark indicated by: Dsurveyto available datum; Dphysical markings; 0 vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types. . DWetland boundaries, as shown on the attached wetland deiin~ation map and/or in a delineation report preparlXl by: Basis For Not Asserting Jurisdiction: ilIThe reviewed area consists entirely of uplands. fI,unable to confirm the presence of waters in 33 CFR part 328{a)(J, 2, or 4-7). I!fHeadquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 33 CPR part 328.3(a)(3). liThe Corps has made a case-.specific determination that the following waters present on the site are not Waters of the United States: o Waste treatment systems, including treatment ponds or lagoons, pursuantt6 33GFR part 328.3. o AtificiaUy irrigated areas, which would revert to upland if the irrigation ceased. Arti'ficiallakesandponds created by excavatjng.-an.d/or dildng.d.I"J land to collecta.11d. '. . .... retain water and ",'bich are used exclusively for such purposes as stock watering, irrigation, settling basins, or rice growing. o Artificial reflecting or swimming pools or otber small ornamental bodies of water created by excavating an.dlor diking dry land to retain water for primarily aesthetic reasons. o Water-filled depressions created in dry land incidental to const11lction activity and pits excavated in dry land for the purpose of obtaining fill, sand, or grdvel \lnless and until the construction or excavation operation is abandoned and the resulting body of water meets the definition of waters of the United States found at 33 CFR 3283(a). o Isolated, intrastate wetland with nonexusto interstate cominerce. o Prior converted cropland, as detemiined by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. Explain rationale: o Non-tidal drainage or irrigation ditches excavated on dry land. Explain rationale: . 0 Other (explain): . . . ! DATAREVlEWED FOR JURSIDICTlONAL DETElUfLNATION (mark all that apply): I iii.' Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or Qn behalf of the applicant. ! '. Dutasheetspreparedlsubmitted by aron behalfoftheapplicant. i '[83" This office conctirs with the delineation report, dated October 9, 2{}(13, July 2004, and September 24,.201>4, i prepared by (company): I Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. I. 0 This office does not concur with the delineation report, dated prepared by (company): I.~:'-' Data sheets prepared by the Corps. . .... . Corps' navigable waters' studit:;s: , ~:; .n.S.Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ------Ii~2-~~+}~l;;;;!;Ii.;;~;t~$~..~ ~ -", . I.:. U.S.-GeologiCal Survey 15 MinuteHistoric quadrangles: ..... USDA Natural Resources Conservatiol1 Service Soil Survey; 11 National wetlands inventory maps: rI State/Local wetland inventory maps; II FEMAfFIRMmaps (MfW Name &. Date): II lOO-year Floodplain Elevation is: (NGVD) '11 Aerial Photographs (Name &. Date):FSA 2003 II Other photographs (Date): 1.'-....:..:....... Ad, "an. c.e.d...ldc~t..ificatjon Wetland maps: ':.; Site visitldetermination conducted o.n: : AppiicabIe/supporting case law: . "_ Other information (please specify): . 'W::Uimds are ldentllled and delmcated usmg thc methods and cntena estabhshca In me Corps Wetland DclmeatJon Manual (87 Manual) (I.e., occurrence of l1yili'ophytie vegetation, hydric soils and wetlanilhydr.ology). 2The term "adjacent" means bordering, contiguous, or neighboring. . Wetlands separated from .other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural .riverbcrms, beach dunes; and the like are also adjaCent. ,/II' O' L. .....IVY -I -;Z 7 - t> T ..~ . .. ....... ... ........-... "' .-.---." . .......- '" . Peterson Environmental " Gansu lti ng,lnc. MEMORANDUM TO: }Vlr Jon Ahlness, Regulatory Branch FROM: .Daniel DeJoode, Ph.D. and James Arndt, Ph.D. ," . . DATE: September 24, 2004 SUBJECT: Jurisdictional Status of the Drainage Ditch on the Shakopee High School Site . Questions have been raised regarding the jurisdictional status of a deeply incised drainage ditch on the site of the proposed Shakopee High School.'Afl assessment of wetlands on the site performed fall, 2003 and summer, 2004 (PEC reports dated October 9,2003 and July 29,2004, respectively) found no wetlands on the site and indicated that the ditch was created in upland soils, lacked wetland character, and was therefore not jurisdictional. However" data Pdints directly on the ditch were not included in the reports. This memorandum was prepared in response to the, Corp's request for further information on the jurisdictional status of the ditch in question as a potential water of the US that maybe subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. This memorandum is provided in support of a formal request Jar a letter of no jurisdiction acknowledging the absence of wetlands on the site that would be regulated under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Daniel DeJoode completed a site inspection of the drainage ditch on September 23,2004. The ditch is approximately 25~feetdeep within the site, flows northwest from its head at the stormwater pond just east of the southeast corner of the property, and ultimately discharges to the south of TH 169 north of the project site. Grade is from southeast to northwest in contradiction to the flow indicated in the, initial PEC wetland delineation report. It is likely that the ditch is deeply incised to provide a positive hydraulic gradient through elevated terraces where the natural flow is to the south (Figure 1). According to project engineers, the ditch is designed to be a temporary emergency conveyance for stormwater originating in the development to the east of the Shakopee HS site. Runoff would be, discharged to the Minnesota River to the north. However, the ditch is planned to be filled in under full development. Stonnwater will then flow north to the Minnesota River through storm sewers. Ditch Vegetation Throughout the drainage, the dominant vegetation consists of upland' ruderal and groundcover species. This includes timothy (Phleumpratense; wetland indicator status = FACU+), smooth brome (Bromus inermis; NI); white clover ,(Trifolium repens; FACU+), red clover (Trifolium pratense; F ACU+), and yellow foxtail (Setaria glauca; F AC). Subdominant associated species include prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola;F AC), common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia; FACU), curly dock (Rumex crispus; FAC+), and horseweed (Conyza canadensis; FAC-). Wetland species are minor components of this community and consist of a few isolated individuals or clumps of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea; FACW+), Pennsylvania smartweed (Polygonum pensylvanicum; FACW+) and barnyard grass (Echinochloa crusgalli; 1355 Mendota Heights Road, Suite 100 Mendota Heights, MN 55120-1112 Tel 651-686-0151 Fax 651-686-0369 '''....n'f. petersonenv.com ~' l';~k/ Mr. Jon Ahlness .' . September 24, 2004 .l\"" Page 2 PEC Project No. 2004-072 F ACW). However, these species are growing immediately adjacent to, or interspersed with, upland species such timothy, smooth brome and red and white clover. Ditch, Soils Sediments in the lowest portions of the ditch had dark A (lOYR 2/1) and C honzons(lOYR 2/2 or a mix of lOYR 4/3 and 10 YR 4/2). It should be noted that since the ditch has been excised 25-feet into the surrounding terrace, the surfaces exposed in and near the bottom of the ditch are more representative of "geological material" than soil. It is likely that the ditch was topsoiled during construction and that the soils as described reflects grading of subsurface glacial terrace sediments and subsequent topsoiling and planting for erosion control. Auger borings could not be complete beyond 24 inches due to auger refusal by gravel and cobbles that typically underlie surfacial terrace deposits. Ditch Hydrology No hydrologic indicators of jurisdictional wetland were observed in the drainage ditch. No water table was encountered in soil auger holes, and there were no primary or secondary indicators of inundation or saturation. There were no drift lines, sediment deposits, water marks, water stained leaves, oxidized rhizospheres or redoximorphic features. The fact that the bottom of the drainage has a nearly continuous cover of upland species indicates that significant hydrology is rarely present, and is probably limited during the growing season to runoff following heavy rainfall events. Wetland delineation data forms' are attached to this memo. Figure 2 shows the location of sample points, and Figures 3-5 present representative photographs of the drainage ditch. Based' on our field observations, it is apparent that this ditch does not meet criteria to be considered a wetland or a "Water of the United States'~. The ditch is, in fact, a temporary measure to ensure 'adequate stormwater protection for the development to ,the east and will be filled in under full development.