HomeMy WebLinkAboutNovember 18, 2025 - Council PacketSHAKOPE E
Shakopee City Council Regular Meeting
Tuesday, November 18, 2025
7:00 PM
City Hall, 485 Gorman Street
Vision: Shakopee is a distinctive river town with a variety of business, cultural, and
recreational opportunities in a safe, welcoming, and attractive environment. Our vision
is for Shakopee to continue being the place people want to live, work, and play!
Mission: Our mission is to deliver high quality services essential to maintaining a safe
and sustainable community. We commit to doing this cost-effectively, with integrity and
transparency.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Special Presentations
4.a Recognition of Show Off Shakopee Winners
5. Approval of Agenda
6. Consent Agenda
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these unless a council member or staff requests, in which event the item will be removed
from the consent agenda for separate discussion & action.
6.a Surplus Property
6.b Approve the Feasibility Report and Call for a Public Hearing for the 12th
Avenue Improvement Project
6.c Monthly Financial Report - October 2025
6.d Accept Proposal from Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) Proposal for Design
and In -Construction Services for the 2026 Downtown ADA, Lighting & Tree
Rehabilitation Improvements.
1
6.e Final Plat of Arbor Bluff Third Addition
6.f Change Order for SRF for West End AUAR Five Year Update
6.g Change order for Miller Dunwoodie Architects
6.h Approval of the October 1, 2025 City Council Minutes
6.i Approval of the November 5, 2025 City Council Minutes
6.j Preliminary approval to the issuance of revenue bonds for the benefit of
Reuter Walton Development, LLC (conduit debt) and application for LIHTC.
6.k Resolution approving documents in connection with the issuance of revenue
bonds of the City of Shakopee for the benefit of St. Francis Regional Medical
Canter and ratifying Resolution No. R2025-125
6.1 Change Order for Dog Park totaling $9,860.00
6.m Additional information to squad that was salvaged and authorized for disposal
from January 21, 2025 meeting
7. Public Comment
Individuals may address the City Council about any item not on the regular agenda. Speakers are
requested to come to the center table, state their name and address for the clerk's record, and limit their
remarks to three minutes. The City Council will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but
may refer the matter to staff for a follow up report or direct that matter be scheduled on an upcoming
agenda.
8. Business removed from consent agenda
9. General Business
9.a Ordinance Creating Standards, Rules and Regulations and Licensing of Towing
Companies.
10. Reports
Liaison and Administration
10.a City Bill List
10.b News and Announcements
11. Other Business
12. Adjourn to December 2, 2025, at 7:00 pm
2
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 4.a
November 18, 2025
Recognition of Show Off Shakopee Winners
Amanda Lillie, Communications Manager
Action to be considered:
N/A
Motion Type:
Informational only
Background:
The Communications Department hosts the Show Off Shakopee photo contest each
September, inviting community members to submit up to three photos taken in
Shakopee sometime in the last two years. New categories are chosen each year, and cash
prizes are awarded to the winners of each category, as well as a Grand Prize winner.
This year, Communications staff chose the finalists and posted the photos in each City
building, giving City staff an opportunity to vote for the winners. With more than 110
votes cast, the winners are:
Uniquely Shakopee - Christopher Straub
Fun in the Sun - Bill Schleper
Golden Hour - Kathleen Borka
Budding Photographer: Lucyana Gillson
Grand Prize - Jane Velde
Recommendation:
N/A
Budget Impact:
The Communications budget includes $500 annually for the contest - $50/each for
category winners; $100 for grand prize; and funding to buy frames and have the photos
professionally printed.
Attachments:
2025_SOS_Winners_Recognition.potx.pdf
3
a)
a)
O
4-)
co v)
4-J
ci) c
q_q- _c cu
oU
� o
0 0
ci) 0-
Lr)
_c _c
O
N
Nov. 5, 2025
Photographer: Aniket Nagdive
CO
Uniquely Shakopee Winner
N.
.
V)
V)
co
I..L
(j1
_c
4-J
a)
u_
hanie Wiegert
Photographer: S
ra
c
O
O
O
a)
a)
2
0.)
O
Co
CL3
a
cu
V
a
O
O
O_
ANIL
.
ro
ll_
O
a)
-O
aJ
�<
co
o
0
O_ 2
0
4
Golden Hour Winner
co
szu
4_,
0
co
Q)
s
0
ca
0
0
Lucyana Gillson
a)
0
0
0
e
U
0.1
r i
ii
I
0
ca
c0
u
CU
0
c0
0
0
s
c
O
V
co
C
C\
V
M
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.a
November 18, 2025
Surplus Property
Josh Davis, Sergeant
Action to be considered:
Declare six vehicles as surplus property and authorize disposal.
Motion Type:
Unanimous
Background:
The following vehicle was obtained through forfeiture proceedings and are described as
follows:
1. 2005 Pontiac Grand Prix, VIN: #2G2WP522951142803
2. 2004 Ford F150, VIN: #1 FTPW14524KC59043
3. 2007 Buick LUC, VIN: #1 G4H D57227U 110820
4. 2010 BMW 750, VIN: #WBAKC6C59ACL67857
5. 2016 Ford Fusion, VIN: #3FA6P0H74GR186830
6. 2006 BMW X5, VIN: #5UXFB53576LV25913
The vehicles suitable for resale will be sold at auction and the proceeds, if any, will be
distributed according to Minnesota State Statute. The vehicles not suitable for resale and
will be junked.
Recommendation:
Approve action as requested
Budget Impact:
None
Attachments:
14
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.b
November 18, 2025
Approve the Feasibility Report and Call for a Public Hearing for the 12th
Avenue Improvement Project
Henry Pagel, Graduate Engineer
Alex Jordan, City Engineer
Action to be considered:
Adopt Resolution R2025-128 Receiving a Feasibility Report and Calling a Public Hearing for
the 12th Avenue Improvement Project, CIF -26-001.
Motion Type:
Adopt
Background:
A Feasibility Report has been prepared to evaluate the full -depth pavement
reconstruction of 12th Avenue as part of the 2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
Project, as identified in the current adopted 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (see
attached project summary sheet CIF -26-001). The Feasibility Report has been completed
and is attached for Council review. The purpose of the report is to evaluate the existing
infrastructure (streets, utilities, sidewalks, street lighting and drainage) and make
recommendations for any improvements that are needed. The report also addresses the
estimated improvement costs, funding and the proposed assessments.
Resolution R2025-128 sets a date for the public hearing for this project on December 16,
2025. Approval of the resolution does not order the project and does not commit the
Council to construct any improvements at this time. Ordering the project will be
considered by the City Council upon completion of the public hearing.
A presentation of the project and feasibility report will be made to the public and the City
Council at the subsequently scheduled public hearing. The public hearing provides the
property owners adjacent to the project area and the general public an opportunity to
address the City Council on this project.
Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution R2025-128.
Budget Impact:
15
Based on the information in the Feasibility Report, the estimated total project cost is
$2,181,963.63. The following Costs and Funding Summary provides a breakdown of the
estimated amounts, comparing the CIP amounts to the current feasibility estimated
amounts. The CIP amounts only include the portion of the 2026 Full -Depth Pavement
Reconstruction Project attributed to 12th Avenue, as the remaining project areas will not
be specially assessed to benefitting property owners.
Table 1: Costs and Funding Summary
CIP Budget (12th
Avenue)
Feasibility Estimate
COSTS
Construction Cost
$1,495,000
$1,653,002.75
Contingency
$299,000
$165,300.28
Administration, Engineering,
Legal
$224,000
$363,660.61
Total Estimated Project Costs
$2,018,000
$2,181,963.63
Estimated Revenue
Special Assessments
$583,000
$601,168.21
Capital Improvements Fund
$1,356,000
$1,402,727.42
Storm Sewer Fund
$60,000
$152,275.20
Sanitary Sewer Fund
$10,000
$16,552.80
Shakopee Public Utilities
$9,000
$9,240.00
Total Estimated Revenue
$2,018,000
$2,181,963.63
Attachments:
CIP Sheet (CIF-26-001).pdf
Feasibility Report.pdf
Resolution R2025-128.docx
16
2026 thru 2030
Project Details
Shakopee, MN
Project #
Project Name
CIF -26-001
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
Total Project Cost $2,885,000
Department Capital Improvements Fund
Category Street Reconstruction
Status Active
Fund Capital Improvement Fund
Contact City Engineer
Type Improvement
Priority 1 - Have to do
Useful Life 25 years
Description
This project is for the full depth reconstruction of the bituminous roadway for Crossings Boulevard from Country Road 18 to approximately 710 feet west of
Foothill Trail and 12th Avenue from east of County Road 83 to Valley Park Drive. With this project, 12th Avenue will be converted from a 4 -lane to a 3 -lane section
as recommended by a transportation study that was completed in 2019. Additionally, the intersection of 12th Avenue and Valley Park Drive will be evaluated for
proper traffic control and configuration. Utility, curb and gutter repairs and improvements will be evaluated and included with this project.
Justification
This is a continuation of the City's Pavement Preservation Program to maintain existing infrastructure.
Prior
140,000
Prior
140,000
Expenditures
Construction/Maintenance
Engineering/Administration
Funding Sources
Capital Improvement Fund
Special Assessments
Sanitary Sewer Fund
Tota I
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
2,580,000 0 0 0 0
165,000 0 0 0 0
2,745,000 0 0 0 0
Total
2,580,000
165,000
2,745,000
Cost Sharing, SPUC
Storm Drainage Fund
Tota I
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
2,100,000 0 0 0 0 2,100,000
530,000 0 0 0 0 530,000
55,000 0 0 0 0 55,000
45,000 0 0 0 0 45,000
15,000 0 0 0 0 15,000
2,745,000 0 0 0 0 2,745,000
Budget Impact
Required ADA improvements are generally unfunded mandates to improve accessibility and to minimize liability.
48
Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software
17
2026 thru 2030
Project Details
Shakopee, MN
Project #
Project Name
CIF -26-001
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
Contact
Department
City Engineer
Capital Improvements Fund
49
Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software
18
November 2025
Feasibility Report
2026 Full -Depth Pavement
Reconstruction
SHAKOPEE
Street Improvements and Appurtenance Work Locations:
- 12t'' Avenue
County Road 83 to Valley Park Drive
19
20
FEASIBILITY REPORT
FOR
2026 FULL -DEPTH PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Micah Heckman
Date November 12, 2025 License No. 49589
Feasibility Report
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project CIF -26-001
Page 1
21
FEASIBILITY REPORT
2026 FULL -DEPTH PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION
Street Improvements and Appurtenance Work:
12th Avenue — CR83 to Valley Park Dr
City Project Number CIF -26-001
November 2025
Prepared By:
City of Shakopee
Engineering Department
485 Gorman Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
(952) 233-9300
(952) 233-3801 (Fax)
Feasibility Report
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project CIF -26-001
Page 2
22
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City's adopted 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan programs the reconstruction of
12th Avenue from County Road 83 to Valley Park Drive as a 2026 construction project.
The City of Shakopee Engineering Department has completed a feasibility report to
analyze the full -depth pavement reconstruction of 12th Avenue consistent with the
City's Pavement Management Program.
12th Avenue is a major collector roadway that provides access to the City's Valley Park
Industrial complex. The recommended improvements consist of full -depth reclamation
of the street, repair of a failing sanitary sewer main, and storm drainage improvements.
The estimated costs for the proposed improvements are $2,181,963.63.
Financing for this project would come from multiple funding sources, including special
assessments to benefiting property owners, as follows:
FUNDING:
Special Assessments
$601,168.21
Capital Improvement Fund
$1,402,727.42
Storm Drainage Fund
$152,275.20
Shakopee Public Utilities
$9,240.00
Sanitary Sewer
$16,552.80
This report has been prepared in accordance with the rules outlined in Minnesota
Statutes Chapter 429 allowing for the use of special assessments as a funding source.
Special assessment amounts for this project have been calculated in accordance with
the City of Shakopee's special assessment policy. As shown in the Assessment Roll,
proposed assessments include a per acre unit rate of $7,167.43.
Upon receipt of this report and in accordance with Minnesota State Statutes 429, the
City Council will need to call for and hold a public hearing to consider the
improvements, order the improvements, declare costs and call for and hold an
assessment hearing. Construction is anticipated to be completed in 2026.
Feasibility Report
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project CIF -26-001
Page 3
23
1. BACKGROUND
The City of Shakopee adopted 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) contains the
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction Project. This project is a continuation of the
City's Pavement Management Program to maintain existing infrastructure. The
improvements consist of full -depth reclamation of the roadways for the following
locations:
- 12th Avenue, from CR83 to Valley Park Drive.
All existing infrastructure elements (street, utilities, sidewalk & trails, street lighting,
etc.) within the project area were evaluated as part of this feasibility report.
2. ROADWAYS
A. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The proposed segments of 12th Avenue were initially constructed in 1985, meaning the
existing pavement base has been in service for over 40 years. Maintenance and
improvements performed on the existing pavement have included crack sealing (2018),
seal coats (2013), a mill and overlay (2007), and patching in some areas. A pedestrian
trail was constructed on the south side of the street in 2020. The trail was seal coated in
2024.
12th Avenue is constructed as a 44 -foot wide, four lane, undivided roadway, and
includes an 8 -foot pedestrian trail and 8 -foot grass boulevard on the south side. The
street was constructed with bituminous pavement, concrete curb and gutter, and storm
sewer for surface water drainage. The bituminous asphalt surface has deteriorated, and
pavement distresses include longitudinal cracking, alligator cracking, and rutting. The
curb and gutter is in fair condition.
The intersection of 12th Avenue and Valley Park Drive has an atypical stop sign control.
The movements between Valley Park and the west leg of 12th Avenue maintain right-of-
way, while the east leg of 12th Avenue has a stop sign control.
The trail was constructed with bituminous pavement, and concrete pedestrian ramps.
The trail and ramps are in good condition and are ADA compliant.
A geotechnical investigation was performed for the project to obtain and analyze soil
samples up to 14.5 feet below the street pavement. The geotechnical evaluation report
contains information regarding the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions and
includes appropriate design and construction recommendations. Soil borings indicate
there are generally suitable soils along the 12th Avenue corridor. The soils consist of
poorly graded sands, and silty sands. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the
borings. See appendix B for the geotechnical report.
Feasibility Report
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project CIF -26-001
Page 4
24
B. PROPOSED CONDITIONS
Based on the condition of the existing bituminous asphalt surface, complete
replacement of the street section with full -depth reclamation (FDR) is warranted and
will provide the most cost-effective long-term rehabilitation. FDR would grind, pulverize
and mix the existing aggregate base with the existing bituminous pavement. Reclaim
material will be stockpiled and the subgrade will be tested to determine the stability of
the underlying soils. Minor subgrade corrections will only be made in areas where poor
subgrade material is encountered. The recommended typical section includes 5 -inch
bituminous surface and a 10 -inch reclaimed aggregate base.
Portions of the existing curb and gutter will be replaced where significant cracks,
settlements or ponding of water occur.
In 2019, the City completed a traffic assessment along 12th Avenue to evaluate the
appropriate lane configuration along 12th Avenue, and traffic control at the intersection
of 12th Avenue and Valley Park Drive (Appendix C). Based on the results of this
evaluation, 12th Avenue will be converted to a 3 -lane roadway with a continuous center
left turn lane. The atypical stop sign control at the intersection of 12th Avenue and Valley
Park Drive will be updated to a standard control layout. The stop sign will be moved to
Valley Park Drive, and vehicle right-of-way will be the same as typical T -intersections.
The pedestrian trail will be protected during construction and not be altered. See
appendix A for an overview of the proposed layout.
Other improvements include the reconstruction of the ends of driveways, replacement
of landscaping elements and repairing irrigation systems that are impacted. Disturbed
boulevard areas will be restored with a compost -topsoil blend and sod.
3. STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM
A. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The project area along 12th Avenue includes 11 fiberglass streetlight poles with LED
fixtures that run along the north side of the proposed segments of 12th Avenue. All lights
are in good condition.
B. PROPOSED STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS
There are no proposed improvements to the street lighting recommended with this
project. There may be a need to relocate streetlights or underground wiring to
accommodate the reconstruction of the roadways or pedestrian facilities, so it is
proposed to include some budget for these minor relocation efforts. This will be
determined in final design and eliminated if relocation is not necessary.
Feasibility Report
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project CIF -26-001
Page 5
25
4. STORM DRAINAGE AND TREATMENT SYSTEM
A. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The existing storm drainage system on 12th Avenue consists of concrete curb and gutter,
storm sewer catch basins and reinforced concrete pipe. The existing drainage structures
do not meet the City's current design standards. The surface water on 12th Avenue is
collected in the storm sewer network that drains into ditches that eventually flow to the
Minnesota River. The system was constructed in 1985.
B. PROPOSED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Storm drainage improvements will be made to the existing system along 12th Avenue.
Non -conforming catch basins will be replaced with city standard drainage structures.
Minor drainage structure maintenance will be included, such as replacement of failing
grout on adjusting rings or around doghouses and inverts. See appendix A for an
overview of the proposed layout.
Stormwater treatment improvements are not required due to the scope of the
improvements.
5. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
A. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The existing sanitary sewer main on 12th Avenue consists of 12 -inch polyvinyl chloride
pipe (PVC) sewer main that runs east along the south side of the street in the boulevard.
Service laterals cross underneath 12th Avenue at several points and a sewer main
crosses 12th Avenue at the intersection with Park Place. Sewer inspections conducted for
preparation of this report have identified that the main that crosses at Park Place is
settling and has experienced a joint failure and developed a belly.
B. PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed sanitary sewer improvements include the repair of the sanitary sewer
main that crosses underneath 12th Avenue at Park Place. This includes the installation of
one new manhole between the undamaged section and proposed new section of pipe.
See appendix A for an overview of the proposed layout.
6. WATER SYSTEM
A. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The existing water main system on 12th Avenue consists of 16 -inch diameter ductile iron
pipe, located along the south side of the roadway in the boulevard. The water main in
this area was constructed in 1992. Multiple hydrants were relocated in 2020 with the
construction of the bituminous trail on the south side.
Feasibility Report
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project CIF -26-001
Page 6
26
B. PROPOSED WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS
The water department at Shakopee Public Utilities (SPU) reviewed the condition of the
water main system in the project area and has determined no major repairs or
improvements are required. Only regular maintenance and adjustments to surface
access points are required. See appendix A for an overview of the proposed layout.
7. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENT
All public infrastructure owned, maintained and operated by the City along the
proposed segments of 12th Avenue are located within City right-of-way or easements.
No additional easements for any existing or proposed improvements located within the
roadway will be needed for those areas.
8. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS - STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Consistent with the City's Special Assessment Policy (Appendix F), the costs to complete
the proposed pavement reconstruction along 12th Avenue improvements are eligible to
be assessed to benefiting property owners.
In accordance with the City's Special Assessment Policy, 30% of the project costs for the
roadway and streetlighting improvements are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting
properties. The remaining 70% of these costs are proposed to be funded by the Capital
Improvement Fund. All other utilities are proposed to be funded out of their respective
utility fund and are not assessed.
In accordance with the Special Assessment Policy, assessments have been computed as
follows:
All lots adjacent to 12th Avenue are proposed to be assessed on an area basis (see
Appendix D, Figure 3). Corner lots will have their total area divided in half, and the
portion adjacent to 12th Avenue is assessed. A corner lot is defined as a lot of record
with two sides adjacent to existing City streets.
12th Avenue Assessments
Total Roadway and Streetlighting Costs = $2,003,895.63
Assessment Ratio Per Policy = 30%
Assessable Roadway and Streetlighting Costs = $601,168.69
Total Assessable Area = 83.875 Acres
Roadway and Streetlight Assessments per Acre = $7,167.43
The calculated assessment rate has been applied to the individual properties and a
Preliminary Assessment Roll has been prepared. The Preliminary Assessment Roll is
shown in Appendix D.
Feasibility Report
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project CIF -26-001
Page 7
27
9. ESTIMATED COSTS & FUNDING
The total estimated cost of the proposed project is $2,181,963.63. The preliminary
estimate includes the cost for project administration, legal, engineering and
construction contingency. The following costs and estimated funding were prepared
using anticipated unit prices for 2026 construction costs and are subject to change,
depending on the final design of the project, bids received, and actual work performed.
Table 1. Cost & Funding Comparison of Original CIP and Amended Project Scope
Adopted CIP
Feasibility
Estimate
Estimated Expenditures
Estimated Construction Cost Street & Utility
$1,495,000
$1,653,002.75
Contingencies (20%/10%)
$299,000
$165,300.28
Administration, Engineering, Legal (15%/20%)
$224,000
$363,660.61
Total Estimated Project Costs (Feasibility)
$2,018,000
$2,181,963.63
Estimated Revenue
Special Assessments
$583,000
$601,168.21
Capital Improvements Fund
$1,356,000
$1,402,727.42
Storm Sewer Fund
$60,000
$152,275.20
Sanitary Sewer Fund
$ 10,000
$16,552.80
Shakopee Public Utilities
$9,000
$9,240.00
Total Estimated Revenue (Feasibility)
$2,018,000
$2,181,963.63
Feasibility Report
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project CIF -26-001
Page 8
28
10. PROJECT SCHEDULE
Table 2 below outlines the preliminary project schedule.
Table 2. Project Schedule
Action
Target Date
City Council Receives Feasibility Report, Calls for
Public Hearing
November 18 2025
'
City Council Holds Public Hearing, Authorizes the
Project and Orders Preparation of Plans and
Specifications
December 16, 2025
City Council Approves Plans and Specs, Authorizes
Advertisement for Bids
March 3, 2025
City Receives and Opens Project Bids
April 7, 2025
City Council Considers Award of Contract
April 21, 2025
Start Project Construction
May 2026
Construction Substantially Complete
September 2026
City Council Declares Cost to be Assessed, Calls for
Public Hearing
October 2026
Hold Assessment Public Hearing
November 2026
11. PUBLIC HEARING
In order to consider the use of assessments for financing a portion of the 12TH Avenue
Improvements Project, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 requires two public hearings be
held regarding the project.
Summary descriptions of the two required hearings are provided below. Additional
information regarding the hearings is contained in the City of Shakopee's Special
Assessment Policy.
A. IMPROVEMENT HEARING
The first public hearing is referred to as the "Improvement Hearing" and is called after
the Feasibility Report has been accepted and the City Council chooses to advance the
Feasibility Report
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project CIF -26-001
Page 9
29
project. Notice of the hearing is required to be made to the general public, as well as
specifically to those parcels proposed for assessment.
The information in the Feasibility Report is presented at the Improvements Hearing,
including the estimated project costs and the estimated assessments. After the hearing
is closed, if the City wishes to proceed with the project, the City Council then takes
action to officially order the improvements.
B. ASSESSMENT HEARING
The second public hearing is referred to as the "Assessment Hearing". The purpose of
the assessment hearing is to present the actual assessment roll to the properties
proposed to be assessed. Specific notice of the hearing is required to be directly sent to
those properties proposed for assessment; notice must also be made to the general
public.
To prepare for the Assessment Hearing, the City must have the final assessment roll
prepared with the actual assessment proposed to be levied against the properties. This
differs from the Improvement Hearing, where only the estimated assessments were
presented. Preparation of the final assessment roll must be based on actual costs from
the project. Minnesota Statute allows the assessment hearing to be held either before
the award of the contract and start of construction, or after construction has been
completed.
12. CONCLUSION
The overall condition of the City's street and utility infrastructure system is critical to the
operation, safety, welfare and economic health of the entire community. Because of
the infrastructure needs described and the proposed solutions and estimated costs
provided in this report, the proposed project is considered to be necessary, cost
effective and feasible.
Feasibility Report
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project CIF -26-001
Page 10
30
APPENDIX A
Proposed Conditions Figure
Feasibility Report
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project CIF -2026-001
31
Z£
IL
INE4
gy,
_t
i
� .
I I 4
Fn
Il II • �
UM I.
4
1
:I •
i
0
I
W
Q
SHAKOPEE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
12TH AVENUE FULL -DEPTH PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION
PROPOSED LAYOUT
APPENDIX B
Geotechnical Report
Feasibility Report
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project CIF -2026-001
33
the science you build on
Geotechnical Evaluation Report
12th Avenue Reconstruction
Canterbury Road to Valley Park Drive South
Shakopee, Minnesota
Prepared for
City of Shakopee
Professional Certification:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
ofess' w nal Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Bradley J,IcCarter, PE
Director, Snior Engineer
Licei6e-Number: 48478
October 23, 2025
'.► MOO 11
' F UCENKIOFESSIONAL
SED
! 7
- ENGINEER
- • 48478
rOr t ;"
rrI,I1
Braun Intertec Corporation
Project B2508547
BRAUN
INTERTEC
October 23, 2025 Project B2508547
Alexander Enyi
City of Shakopee
485 German Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
Re: Geotechnical Evaluation
12th Avenue Reconstruction
Canterbury Road to Valley Park Drive South
Shakopee, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Enyi:
We are pleased to present this geotechnical evaluation report for the 12th Avenue Reconstruction Project in
Shakopee, Minnesota. The following report contains the results of our evaluation and should be read in its
entirety.
Thank you for making Braun Intertec Corporation (Braun Intertec) your geotechnical consultant for this
project. If you have questions about this report, or if there are other services that we can provide in support of
our work to date, please contact Jesse Hill -Male at 763.248.0148 (jhill-male@braunintertec.com) or Brad
McCarter at 952.995.2268 (bmccarter@braunintertec.com).
Sincerely,
Braun Intertec Corporation
/./(6,4,7
Jesse O. Hill -Male, EIT
Staff Engineer
Bradley J. McCarter, PE
Director, Senior Engineer
952.995.2000
11001 Hampshire Ave. S, Bloomington, MN 55438 braunintertec.com
35
Bi
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Project Description 1
1.2 Site Conditions and History 1
1.3 Purpose 1
1.4 Background Information and Reference Documents 2
1.5 Scope of Services 2
2.0 Results 3
2.1 Geologic Overview 3
2.2 Boring Results 3
2.2.1 Existing Pavement Section 3
2.2.2 Soil Strata 3
2.3 Groundwater 4
2.4 Laboratory Test Results 4
3.0 Recommendations 5
3.1 Design and Construction Discussion 5
3.1.1 Pavement Subgrades and Utility Support 5
3.1.2 Full -Depth -Reclamation 5
3.1.3 Reuse of Pavement Materials 5
3.1.4 Reuse of On -Site Soils 6
3.1.5 Construction Disturbance 6
3.2 Full -Depth -Reclamation Rehabilitation Method 6
3.3 Site Grading and Subgrade Preparation 6
3.3.1 Pavement Subgrade Excavation 6
3.3.2 Excavation Oversizing 7
3.3.3 Excavated Slopes 7
3.3.4 Excavation Dewatering 7
3.3.5 Pavement and Exterior Slab Subgrade Preparation 7
3.3.6 Pavement Subgrade Proofroll 8
3.3.7 Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction 8
3.4 Pavements 9
3.4.1 Design Sections 9
3.4.2 Sand Subbase 9
3.4.3 Bituminous Pavement Materials 9
3.4.4 Subgrade Drainage 10
3.4.5 Performance and Maintenance 10
3.5 Utilities 10
3.5.1 Subgrade Stabilization 10
3.5.2 Corrosion Potential 11
4.0 Procedures 11
4.1 Penetration Test Borings 11
Braun Intertec Page i
36
Table of Contents (Continued)
Bi
4.2 Exploration Logs 11
4.2.1 Log of Boring Sheets 11
4.2.2 Geologic Origins 11
4.3 Material Classification and Testing 12
4.3.1 Visual and Manual Classification 12
4.3.2 Laboratory Testing 12
4.4 Groundwater Measurements 12
5.0 Qualifications 12
5.1 Variations in Subsurface Conditions 12
5.1.1 Material Strata 12
5.1.2 Groundwater Levels 12
5.2 Continuity of Professional Responsibility 13
5.2.1 Plan Review 13
5.2.2 Construction Observations and Testing 13
5.3 Use of Report 13
5.4 Standard of Care 13
Appendix
Soil Boring Location Sketch
Log of Boring Sheets ST -1 to ST -4
Descriptive Terminology of Soil
List of Tables
Table 1-1. Site Aspects and Grading Description 1
Table 2-1. Existing Pavement Section Summary 3
Table 2-2. Subsurface Profile Summary 4
Table 3-1. Engineered Fill Materials* 8
Table 3-2. Pavement Section 9
Braun Intertec Page ii
37
City of Shakopee
12th Avenue Reconstruction
Project B2508547
October 23, 2025
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Project Description
Bi
This geotechnical evaluation report addresses the design, construction, and rehabilitation of the 12th
Avenue Reconstruction Project, located in Shakopee, Minnesota. The project will include the rehabilitation of
12th Avenue East from Canterbury Road to Valley Park Drive South via a full -depth -reclamation (FDR) method
and will also include the installation of new utilities. Table 1-1 summarizes the provided and assumed project
details used to prepare this report.
Table 1-1. Site Aspects and Grading Description
Aspect
Pavement type(s)
Descriptions Source
Pavement loads
Grade changes
Bituminous
3,974,000 ESALs*
Less than 1 -foot
Utility improvements
Installation of approximately 6 new storm sewer
structures and the installation of a new sanitary
sewer manholes approximately 100 feet north
of the 12th Avenue East, along Park Place
Utility invert elevations 5 to 6 feet below the existing surface grades
*Equivalent 18,000 -lb single axle loads based on 20 -year design.
1.2 Site Conditions and History
City of Shakopee
Estimated from the MnDOT Traffic Data, our
discussions with the City of Shakopee, and
using the MnDOT State Aid ESAL Forecast
Calculator assuming the Rural pavement
loading default
Assumed
City of Shakopee
4 City of Shakopee
Currently, the project area serves as a four -lane undivided bituminous -surfaced roadway with curb and
gutter serving primarily commercial properties.
Current site grades are variable with a general downward slope from east to west with elevations ranging
from about 755 1/2 to 759 feet.
1.3 Purpose
The purpose of our geotechnical evaluation will be to characterize subsurface geologic conditions at selected
exploration locations, evaluate their impact on the project, and provide geotechnical recommendations for
use in the design and reconstruction of the 12th Avenue East roadway improvements.
Braun Intertec Page 1
38
City of Shakopee
12th Avenue Reconstruction
Project B2508547
October 23, 2025
1.4 Background Information and Reference Documents
We reviewed the following information:
Plate 3, Surficial Geology, from the Scott County Geologic Atlas prepared by the Minnesota
Geological Survey, dated 2006.
Bi
City of Shakopee Standard Detail No. 1002, revised in May of 2021 and approved in January of 2023.
Communications with the City of Shakopee regarding the proposed project.
In addition to the provided sources, we have used several publicly available sources of information.
We have described our understanding of the proposed construction and site to the extent others reported it
to us. Depending on the extent of available information, we may have made assumptions based on our
experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or interpreted the project details, the
project team should notify us. New or changed information could require additional evaluation, analyses,
and/or recommendations.
1.5 Scope of Services
We performed our scope of services for the project in accordance with our Revised Proposal for Geotechnical
Evaluation (Braun Intertec Proposal No. QTB222039) to the City of Shakopee, dated September 19, 2025. The
following list describes the geotechnical tasks completed in accordance with our authorized scope of
services.
Reviewing the background information and reference documents previously cited.
Staking and clearing the exploration location of underground utilities. Braun Intertec selected and we
staked the new exploration locations. We acquired the surface elevations and locations with GPS
technology using the State of Minnesota's permanent GPS base station network. The Soil Boring
Location Sketch included in the Appendix shows the approximate locations of the borings.
Performing the requested 4 standard penetration test (SPT) borings, denoted as ST -1 to ST -4, to
nominal depths of 15 feet below grade across the site. We note that Boring ST -2 encountered
practical auger refusal at a depth of about 13 feet below grade. Rock coring to advance the boring
beyond auger refusal was not included in our scope of work.
Performing laboratory testing on select samples to aid in soil classification and engineering analysis.
Preparing this report containing a boring location sketch, logs of soil borings, a summary of the soils
encountered, results of laboratory tests, and recommendations for utility and pavement subgrade
preparation and for use in the design and construction of the utility improvements and pavements.
Braun Intertec Page 2
39
City of Shakopee
12th Avenue Reconstruction
Project B2508547
October 23, 2025
Bi
Our scope of services did not include environmental services or testing and our geotechnical personnel
performing this evaluation are not trained to provide environmental services or testing. We can provide
environmental services or testing at your request.
2.0 Results
2.1 Geologic Overview
We based the geologic origins used in this report on the soil types, in -situ and laboratory testing, and
available common knowledge of the geological history of the site. Because of the complex depositional
history, geologic origins can be difficult to ascertain. We did not perform a detailed investigation of the
geologic history for the site.
2.2 Boring Results
2.2.1 Existing Pavement Section
The table below summarizes the pavement material thicknesses encountered at the ground surface within
each of the borings as measured to the nearest 1/2 -inch. The borings encountered bituminous pavements
over an apparent aggregate base layer. The aggregate base thicknesses should be considered approximate,
as the transitions between the aggregate base and underlying granular subgrade are sometimes difficult to
discern. We did not perform gradation analysis on the apparent aggregate base material encountered as part
of the pavement section in accordance with our scope of work. Therefore, we cannot conclusively determine
fi the encountered material satisfies a particular specification.
Table 2-1. Existing Pavement Section Summary
Roadway
12th Avenue
East
Direction Lane
WB
EB
WB
EB
Inside
Outside
Outside
Inside
Boring
Location
ST -1
ST -2
ST -3
ST -4
Bituminous
Thickness
(inches)
5 1/2
5
5
Apparent
Aggregate Base
Thickness
(inches)
Overall Section
Thickness
(inches)
6
7
11 1/2
11
12
15
2.2.2 Soil Strata
The table below provides a summary of the soil boring results from our investigation, in the general order we
encountered the strata. Please refer to the Log of Boring sheets in the Appendix for additional details. The
Descriptive Terminology sheet in the Appendix includes definitions of abbreviations used in the table below.
Braun Intertec
Page 3
40
City of Shakopee
12th Avenue Reconstruction
Project B2508547
October 23, 2025
For simplicity, we define fill to mean existing, uncontrolled, or undocumented fill.
Table 2-2. Subsurface Profile Summary
Bi
Strata
Soil Type -ASTM
Classification
Range of
Commentary and Details
N -Values
Pavement
Section
N/A
N/A
■ See Table 2-1 above for details.
Overall thicknesses range from about 11 to 15 inches.
▪ Bituminous thicknesses of about 5 to 7 inches.
N Apparent aggregate base layer of about 6 to 8 inches.
Existing Fill SM, SP-SM, SP 9 to 33
General consistency of medium dense.
Moisture condition generally moist.
Present at each boring location and varied from 4 to 7 feet below
grade.
Generally silty sand present directly underlying the aggregate base
layer.
General consistency of loose.
Alluvial SP-SM, SP 3 to 13 Moisture condition generally moist.
Generally light brown to brown in color.
Encountered within Boring ST -2 at an elevation of approximately
746 1/2 feet.
General consistency of dense to very dense.
SM with Apparent Auger met refusal at about 13 feet below the existing surface on
Residuum Dolostone 39 to 50+ apparent Dolostone bedrock. Rock coring is needed to confirm the
Fragments composition of refusal materials as the borings could have
potentially met refusal on boulders or limestone floats near the
bedrock surface. Rock coring to advance the borings beyond auger
refusal was not included in our scope.
2.3 Groundwater
We did not observe groundwater while advancing our borings. Therefore, it appears that groundwater is below
the depths explored. Project planning should anticipate seasonal and annual fluctuations of groundwater.
2.4 Laboratory Test Results
The boring logs show the results of the laboratory testing we performed, next to the tested sample depth.
Tests were performed in general conformance with ASTM Standards.
Braun Intertec Page 4
41
City of Shakopee
12th Avenue Reconstruction
Project B2508547
October 23, 2025
3.0 Recommendations
3.1 Design and Construction Discussion
Bi
At the time of this report, the recommendations provided herein are based on the plans and information
provided to us. As the project progresses into final design, elements of the project may be adjusted and as
such, our recommendations should be revisited and may require revision.
References to the MnDOT Specification in this report are to MnDOT's Standard Specification for
Construction, 2025 Edition.
3.1.1 Pavement Subgrades and Utility Support
Based on the results of the borings, we anticipate that the soils near pavement subgrade elevations will
primarily consist of silty sand soils and will be suitable for pavement support. We also anticipate that the
soils encountered near the proposed utility improvement inverts will consist of poorly graded sand or poorly
graded sand with silt materials, which also appear suitable for utility support. We recommend that the
pavement areas are prepared per Section 3.3, the pavement areas are proofrolled per Section 3.3.6 prior to
the placement of aggregate base, and that utilities are backfilled per Section 3.3.7.
3.1.2 Full -Depth -Reclamation
Based on the results of the borings, we anticipate that an FDR rehabilitation method is viable for the project
area, with the borings encountering overall pavement section thicknesses ranging from 11 to 15 inches, that
includes both the bituminous and apparent aggregate base thicknesses.
We understand that the City would prefer to reclaim the existing pavement section, stockpile the reclaim
material, and excavate 5 inches of subgrade material prior to backfilling the stockpiled reclaim material as
the roadway aggregate base layer. We anticipate this approach to be warranted and suitable for the project
area. Refer to Section 3.2 for FDR recommendations and refer to Section 3.3 for preparing the pavement
subgrade prior to backfilling the stockpiled reclaim material.
3.1.3 Reuse of Pavement Materials
From a geotechnical standpoint, milling or reclamation of the bituminous pavement material for reuse as
recycled aggregate base or as a component to the new pavements is acceptable, assuming the produced
product meets the applicable project specifications and these practices are acceptable to the design team.
Prior to reuse, the project should implement thorough quality control practices, including frequent sieve
analyses, asphalt contents and other tests, to achieve desirable characteristics for any reclaimed material
processed on site.
Braun Intertec Page 5
42
City of Shakopee
12th Avenue Reconstruction
Project B2508547
October 23, 2025
Bi
3.1.4 Reuse of On -Site Soils
Based on the results of the soil borings, we anticipate that the on -site existing fill soils are generally suitable
for reuse as engineered fill, provided they can be properly moisture conditioned and compacted as outlined
in Section 3.3.7. The project team should expect that adding moisture to the on -site granular soils should be
expected prior to reuse. Any materials to be used as engineered fill should be tested and approved by the
engineer prior to placement.
3.1.5 Construction Disturbance
The on -site, silty soils are highly susceptible to disturbance due to repeated construction traffic. Disturbance
of these soils may cause areas that were previously prepared, or that were suitable for pavement or utility
support, to become unstable and require moisture conditioning and compaction. Subcutting and replacing
the disturbed materials with crushed, coarse gravel, free of fines is also an alternative. The contractor should
use means and methods to limit the disturbance of the soils.
3.2 Full -Depth -Reclamation Rehabilitation Method
Based on the results of the borings, FDR method is suitable for reconstruction of 12th Avenue East within the
project limits. For pavement materials to be reused by reclamation, we recommend a 10 -inch FDR for 12th
Avenue East. This depth is intended to reduce the chance for extending the FDR through the aggregate base
and potentially disturbing the subgrade soils.
Variation of existing pavement depth and materials should be anticipated. The designer and reclaim
contractor should review our borings to evaluate if there are areas where an adjusted reclaim depth appears
necessary, and to note locations that may limit the reclaim operation. Conditions such as stripped pavement,
excessive bituminous thickness and soft or wet subgrades may require multiple passes with the reclamation
equipment or changes in speed that will affect production.
We recommend implementing thorough quality control practices, including frequent sieve analyses, to
achieve a desirable gradation of the reclaimed material. The number of sieve analyses required can be at the
Engineer's discretion and will also depend on the material specification and pay item used for the reclaim. As
noted above, the aggregate base varies in composition along with bituminous thickness, which will affect the
consistency of the finished product. We suggest that the contractor assume some contingency for importing
clean, crushed rock that can be blended with the reclaimed material to improve the uniformity of the
resulting gradation prior to any direct reuse as aggregate base. This will typically include Class 5 or a "clear"
coarse rock at an assumed proportion of the reclaim quantity.
3.3 Site Grading and Subgrade Preparation
3.3.1 Pavement Subgrade Excavation
To allow for a sufficient pavement section for the anticipated traffic along 12th Avenue East and the site
conditions, we recommend that after reclaiming has been completed all of the pavement materials, that the
reclaim be stockpiled, and we understand that a minimum of 5 inches of the subgrade will be excavated and
Braun Intertec Page 6
43
City of Shakopee
12th Avenue Reconstruction
Project B2508547
October 23, 2025
Bi
removed from within the roadway alignment. Following the minimum subgrade excavation, the subgrade
should be observed by a geotechnical representative to determine if the in -place materials meet the select
granular backfill MnDOT Specification 3149.2.D.3. If such materials are not encountered, it may necessary to
subcut and remove the in -place soils to allow for a 24 -inch thick layer of select granular subbase section
underlying the aggregate base and bituminous. If unsuitable materials such as wet or soft soils are
encountered after the referenced subgrade excavations, the excavations should be extended until suitable
soils are encountered, and we recommend a geotechnical representative observe the exposed subgrade
prior to the placement of engineered fill.
3.3.2 Excavation Oversizing
Although we do not anticipate unsuitable materials to be encountered below pavements, if soils become wet
or unstable during construction or zones of unsuitable soils are encountered, we recommend oversizing the
excavation to extend outward and downward at a slope of 1 H:1V (horizontal:vertical) or flatter.
3.3.3 Excavated Slopes
Based on the borings, we anticipate on -site soils in excavations will consist of granular fill or native soils.
These soils are typically considered Type C Soil under OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration)
guidelines. OSHA guidelines indicate unsupported excavations in Type C soils should have a gradient no
steeper than 1.5H:1 V. Slopes constructed in this manner may still exhibit surface sloughing.
An OSHA -approved qualified person should review the soil classification in the field. Excavations must
comply with the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, "Excavations and Trenches." This
document states that excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor. The project specifications
should reference these OSHA requirements.
3.3.4 Excavation Dewatering
We do not anticipate groundwater to be encountered in excavations for the proposed project, but if collected
rainwater runoff is encountered, it should be removed to facilitate proper backfilling or pavement construction.
3.3.5 Pavement and Exterior Slab Subgrade Preparation
We recommend the following steps for pavement and exterior slab subgrade preparation, understanding the
site will have a grade change of 1 -foot or less.
As discussed previously, once the reclaim material has been stockpiled and excavations have been
performed per Section 3.3.1, have a geotechnical representative observe the excavated subgrade to
evaluate if additional subgrade improvements are necessary.
Slope subgrade soils to allow the removal of accumulating water.
Scarify, moisture condition, and surface compact the exposed subgrade.
Place pavement engineered fill to grade and compact in accordance with Section 3.3.7 to bottom of
the pavement section.
Proofroll the pavement subgrade as described in Section 3.3.6.
Braun Intertec Page 7
44
City of Shakopee
12th Avenue Reconstruction
Project B2508547
October 23, 2025
Bi
3.3.6 Pavement Subgrade Proofroll
After preparing the subgrade as described above and prior to the placement of the aggregate base, we
recommend proofrolling the subgrade soils with a fully loaded tandem -axle truck. We also recommend
having a geotechnical representative observe the proofroll. Areas that fail the proofroll likely indicate soft or
weak areas that will require additional soil correction work to support pavements.
The contractor should correct areas that display excessive yielding or rutting during the proofroll, as
determined by the geotechnical representative. Possible options for subgrade correction include moisture
conditioning and recompaction, subcutting and replacement with soil or crushed aggregate, chemical
stabilization, and/or geotextiles. We recommend performing a second proofroll after the aggregate base
material is in place, and prior to placing bituminous or concrete pavement.
3.3.7 Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction
Table 3-1 below contains our recommendations for engineered fill materials.
Table 3-1. Engineered Fill Materials*
Locations To Be Used
Engineered Fill
Classification
Possible Soil Material
Type Descriptions Specification
Subgrade Soils
(≤3 feet below grading grade of road core)
Subgrade Soils
(≥ 3 feet below grading grade of road core)
Utility Bedding
(stable conditions)
Utility Bedding
(wet or unstable conditions)
Select Granular Backfill
Common Embankment
Select Granular Backfill
SP, SP-SM, SM
SP, SP-SM, SM,
CL, SC
SP, SP-SM
Coarse Aggregate Bedding j GP, GW
MnDOT 3149.2.D.3
MnDOT 2106.2.6.1
MnDOT 3149.2.D.3
MnDOT 3149.G.2
We recommend spreading engineered fill in loose lifts of approximately 8 to 12 inches thick. We recommend
compacting engineered fill in accordance with MnDOT 2106.3.G.1. The project documents should specify
relative compaction of engineered fill, based on the structure located above the engineered fill, and vertical
proximity to that structure.
The project documents should not allow the contractor to use frozen material as engineered fill or to place
engineered fill on frozen material. Frost should not penetrate under foundations during construction.
We recommend performing density tests in engineered fill to evaluate if the contractors are effectively
compacting the soil and meeting project requirements.
Braun Intertec Page 8
45
City of Shakopee
12th Avenue Reconstruction
Project B2508547
October 23, 2025
3.4 Pavements
Bi
3.4.1 Design Sections
Our scope of services for this project did not include laboratory tests on subgrade soils to determine an
R -value for pavement design. Based on our experience with similar silty sand soils anticipated at the pavement
subgrade elevations, we recommend pavement design assume an R -value of 30. Note the contractor may need
to perform limited removal of unsuitable or less suitable soils to achieve this value. Table 3-2 provides a
pavement section, based on the soils support and traffic loads.
Table 3-2. Pavement Section
Roadway
12th Avenue East
Material Thickness
(inches)
2
HMA Wear (1 lift)
HMA Non -Wear (2 lifts)
3
Specification
10
Aggregate Base/Reclaim
24
Sand Subbase
Approved Subgrade
MnDOT 2360 (SPWEA340C)
MnDOT 2360 (SPWEB330C)
MnDOT 2215/3138/2211
(FDR Requirements)
(Reclamation material permitted as
substitute for class 3, 4, 5, or 6)
MnDOT 3149.2.D.3
MnDOT 2106
3.4.2 Sand Subbase
We understand that a 24 -inch sand subbase section may be incorporated to improve the pavement's
performance life. Due to the granular nature of the site, we recommend the subgrade be exposed and
evaluated prior to excavating for the sand subbase section, as excavations may be able to be limited if
materials meeting the MnDOT Specification 3149.2.D.3 are encountered to a depth of 24 -inches below the
aggregate base layer.
In addition to the sand section, a separator fabric (MnDOT Type 5 or similar) should be placed along the
subgrade prior to backfilling with select granular backfill, when applicable. The subgrade should also be
crowned to further promote any collected water to drain away from the center of the roadway. The most
important aspect of the sand section, however, is drain tile placed through the subgrade and routed to a
suitable disposal source to remove any collected water from the subgrade. This would enhance subgrade
drainage efforts and reduce the potential for pavement subgrades to become saturated and heave upon
freezing; strength loss upon thawing will also be reduced.
3.4.3 Bituminous Pavement Materials
When placing pavement next to in -place pavement, we recommend providing a full -depth sawcut to ensure a
uniform joint.
Braun Intertec Page 9
46
City of Shakopee
12th Avenue Reconstruction
Project B2508547
October 23, 2025
Bi
We recommend that the bituminous wear and non -wear courses meet the requirements of MnDOT
Specification 2360. We recommend compacting the reclaim/aggregate base to meet the requirements of
MnDOT Specification 2211.3.D.2.c (Penetration Index Method for the dynamic cone penetrometer [DCP]). We
recommend compacting the bituminous pavements in accordance with MnDOT 2360.3.D.1 (Maximum
Density Method).
3.4.4 Subgrade Drainage
We recommend installing perforated drainpipes throughout pavement areas at low points, around catch
basins, and behind curb in landscaped areas. We also recommend installing drainpipes along pavement
edges where exterior grades promote drainage toward those edge areas. The contractor should place
drainpipes in small trenches, extended at least 8 inches below the granular subbase layer, or below the
aggregate base material where no subbase is present.
3.4.5 Performance and Maintenance
We based the above pavement designs on a 20 -year performance life for bituminous. This is the amount of
time before we anticipate the pavement will require reconstruction. This performance assumes routine
maintenance, such as seal coating and crack sealing. The actual pavement life will vary depending on
variations in weather, traffic conditions and maintenance.
It is common to place the non -wear course of bituminous and then delay placement of wear course. For this
situation, we recommend evaluating if the reduced pavement section will have sufficient structure to
support construction traffic.
Many conditions affect the overall performance of the pavements. Some of these conditions include the
environment, loading conditions and the level of ongoing maintenance. With regard to bituminous pavements
in particular, it is common to have thermal cracking develop within the first few years of placement and
continue throughout the life of the pavement. We recommend developing a regular maintenance plan for
filling cracks in exterior slabs and pavements to lessen the potential impacts for cold weather distress due to
frost heave or warm weather distress due to wetting and softening of the subgrade.
3.5 Utilities
3.5.1 Subgrade Stabilization
Earthwork activities associated with utility installations should adhere to the recommendations in Section 3.3.
We anticipate the soils at typical invert elevations will be suitable for utility support. However, if construction
encounters unfavorable conditions such as soft clay, organic soils or perched water at invert grades, the
unsuitable soils may require some additional subcutting and replacement with sand or crushed rock to
prepare a proper subgrade for pipe support. Project design and construction should not place utilities within
the 1 H:1V oversizing of foundations.
Braun Intertec Page 10
47
City of Shakopee
12th Avenue Reconstruction
Project B2508547
October 23, 2025
Bi
3.5.2 Corrosion Potential
A majority of the soil borings indicated the site predominantly consists of sandy soils. We consider these
soils non- to slightly corrosive to metallic conduits. If utilities extend through clay soils, we recommend
bedding the utilities in sandy soil free of any clay lumps or constructing the utilities with non -corrosive
materials.
4.0 Procedures
4.1 Penetration Test Borings
We drilled the penetration test borings with a truck -mounted core and auger drill equipped with hollow -stem
auger. We performed the borings in general accordance with ASTM D6151 taking penetration test samples
continuously within the upper 6 feet of each soil boring and at 2 1/2- or 5 -foot intervals at greater depths in
general accordance with ASTM D1586. We collected thin -walled tube samples in general accordance with
ASTM D1587 at selected depths. The boring logs show the actual sample intervals and corresponding
depths. We also collected bulk samples of auger cuttings at selected locations for laboratory testing.
4.2 Exploration Logs
4.2.1 Log of Boring Sheets
The Appendix includes Log of Boring sheets for our penetration test borings. The logs identify and describe the
penetrated geologic materials and present the results of penetration resistance and other tests performed.
The logs also present the results of laboratory tests performed on penetration test samples and groundwater
measurements.
We inferred strata boundaries from changes in the penetration test samples and the auger cuttings. Because
we did not perform continuous sampling, the strata boundary depths are only approximate. The boundary
depths likely vary away from the boring locations, and the boundaries themselves may occur as gradual
rather than abrupt transitions.
4.2.2 Geologic Origins
We assigned geologic origins to the materials shown on the logs and referenced within this report, based on:
(1) a review of the background information and reference documents cited above, (2) visual classification of the
various geologic material samples retrieved during the course of our subsurface exploration, (3) penetration
resistance and other testing performed for the project, (4) laboratory test results, and (5) available common
knowledge of the geologic processes and environments that have impacted the site and surrounding area in the
past .
Braun Intertec Page 11
48
City of Shakopee
12th Avenue Reconstruction
Project B2508547
October 23, 2025
4.3 Material Classification and Testing
Bi
4.3.1 Visual and Manual Classification
We visually and manually classified the geologic materials encountered based on ASTM D2488. When we
performed laboratory classification tests, we used the results to classify the geologic materials in
accordance with ASTM D2487. The Appendix includes a chart explaining the classification system we used.
4.3.2 Laboratory Testing
The exploration logs in the Appendix note most of the results of the laboratory tests performed on geologic
material samples. We performed the tests in general accordance with ASTM procedures.
4.4 Groundwater Measurements
The drillers checked for groundwater while advancing the penetration test borings, and again after auger
withdrawal. We then filled the boreholes or allowed them to remain open for an extended period of
observation, as noted on the boring logs.
5.0 Qualifications
5.1 Variations in Subsurface Conditions
5.1.1 Material Strata
We developed our evaluation, analyses, and recommendations from a limited amount of site and subsurface
information. It is not standard engineering practice to retrieve material samples from exploration locations
continuously with depth. Therefore, we must infer strata boundaries and thicknesses to some extent. Strata
boundaries may also be gradual transitions, and project planning should expect the strata to vary in depth,
elevation, and thickness, away from the exploration locations.
Variations in subsurface conditions present between exploration locations may not be revealed until
performing additional exploration work or starting construction. If future activity for this project reveals any
such variations, you should notify us so that we may reevaluate our recommendations. Such variations could
increase construction costs, and we recommend including a contingency to accommodate them.
5.1.2 Groundwater Levels
We made groundwater measurements under the conditions reported herein and shown on the exploration
logs and interpreted in the text of this report. Note that the observation periods were relatively short, and
project planning can expect groundwater levels to fluctuate in response to rainfall, flooding, irrigation,
seasonal freezing and thawing, surface drainage modifications and other seasonal and annual factors.
Braun Intertec Page 12
49
City of Shakopee
12th Avenue Reconstruction
Project B2508547
October 23, 2025
5.2 Continuity of Professional Responsibility
Bi
5.2.1 Plan Review
We based this report on a limited amount of information, and we made a number of assumptions to help us
develop our recommendations. We should be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the designs and
specifications. This review will allow us to evaluate whether we anticipated the design correctly, if any design
changes affect the validity of our recommendations, and if the design and specifications correctly interpret
and implement our recommendations.
5.2.2 Construction Observations and Testing
We recommend retaining us to perform the required observations and testing during construction as part of
the ongoing geotechnical evaluation. This will allow us to correlate the subsurface conditions exposed during
construction with those encountered by the borings and provide professional continuity from the design
phase to the construction phase. If we do not perform observations and testing during construction, it
becomes the responsibility of others to validate the assumption made during the preparation of this report
and to accept the construction -related geotechnical engineer -of -record responsibilities.
5.3 Use of Report
This report is for the exclusive use of the addressed parties. Without written approval, we assume no
responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation, analyses and recommendations may not
be appropriate for other parties or projects.
5.4 Standard of Care
In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar
circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty,
express or implied, is made.
Braun Intertec Page 13
50
Appendix
Soil Boring Location Sketch
Log of Boring Sheets ST -1 to ST -4
Descriptive Terminology of Soil
BRAUN
INTERTEC
51
'S (=MOH )12JVd A3l1VA
WV 91,6£:1.1, 9Z0Z/E 6/O6'yo01o00'6nnp Lb9809Z8\OVO\Lt9809Z8\9Z0Z\=d
BRAUN
INTERTEC
LOG OF BORING
the science you build on
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2508547
Geotechnical ical Evaluation
12th Avenue Reconstruction
12th Ave E, Canterbury Rd to Valley Park Dr S
Shakopee, Minnesota
BORING: ST -1
LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS.
DATUM: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Scott (US Feet)
NORTHING: 214151.6
EASTING: 461369.1
DRILLER: C. McClain LOGGED BY: J. Hill -Male
START DATE: 10/03/25
END DATE: 10/03/25
SURFACE
ELEVATION: 757.7 ft
RIG: 7514
METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA
SURFACING: Bituminous
WEATHER: Clear
Elev./
Depth
ft
—
as a
� J
Description of Materials
Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
Sample
Blows
(N -Value)
Recovery
qp
tsf
MC
o
/o
Tests or Remarks
- 756.7
PAVEMENT, 5 1/2 inches of
inches of apparent aggregate
bituminous over 6
base
15-12-7-7
(19)
18"
7-11-11-10
(22)
18"
3-4-5-6
(9)
18"
6-6-5
(11)
18"
3-5-5
(10)
18"
4-5-8
(13)
18
6
3
3
Water not observed while
drilling.
_ 1.0
755.7
/
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained,
Gravel, brown, moist
trace
- 2 0
-
- 753.7
/
FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND
SM), fine to medium -grained,
brown, moist
with SILT (SP- -
trace Gravel,
_ 4.0
—
-
_
—
-•
_
-
-
-••
744.7
:
:
:
: :
::
•
::. : • •
•
; •:•
::
•-
:: .
/
POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to 5—
medium -grained, light brown, moist, loose to _
medium dense (ALLUVIUM)
—
—X
10-
-
_ 13.0
— 743.2
POORLY GRADED SAND (SP),
grained, trace Gravel, brown,
Odense (ALLUVIUM)
fine to coarse-
moist, medium —
— 14.5
_
-
—
_
_
END OF BORING 15
Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings —
20-
25-
30—
B2508547
Braun Intertec Corporation
Print Date: 10/23/2025
ST -1
page 1 of 1
53
BRAUN
INTERTEC
LOG OF BORING
the science you build on
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2508547
Geotechnical ical Evaluation
12th Avenue Reconstruction
12th Ave E, Canterbury Rd to Valley Park Dr S
Shakopee, Minnesota
BORING: ST -2
LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS.
DATUM: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Scott (US Feet)
NORTHING: 214132.8
EASTING: 462323.0
DRILLER: C. McClain
LOGGED BY: J. Hill -Male
START DATE: 10/03/25
END DATE: 10/03/25
SURFACE
ELEVATION: 755.8 ft
RIG: 7514
METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA
SURFACING: Bituminous
WEATHER: Clear
Elev./
Depth
ft
—
as a
� J
Description of Materials
Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
Sample
Blows
(N -Value)
Recovery
qp
tsf
MC
o
/o
Tests or Remarks
- 754.9
PAVEMENT, 5 inches of bituminous over 6
inches of apparent aggregate base / —
10-9-10-12
(19)
18"
8-9-10-10
(19)
18"
3-4-5-5
(9)
18"
2-1-4
(5)
15)
8
7-13-26
(39)
18"
50/0"
(REF)
22"
4
4
4
9
P200=3%
No sample recovered at 13
p
feet
Auger met refusal at 13 feet
Water not observed while
drilling.
- 0.9
-
_
-
- 751.8
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace _
Gravel, brown, moist
-
_ 4.0
—
_
- 748.8
FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine-
grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist 5-
- 7.0
_::
—746.3
.• : .• :
POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to
medium grained, light brown, moist, loose —
(ALLUVIUM) -
- 9.5
-
742.8
::.
::
.
•:
::
:.
::
:.
SILTY SAND SM , fine to medium -grained, —
( ) g 10
with SILT layers, with apparent Dolostone
fragments, brown, moist, dense to very dense —
(RESIDUUM)- -
-
_ 13.0
—
_
—
—
—
_
-
END OF BORING
—
Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 15_
—
20-
25-
30—
B2508547
Braun Intertec Corporation
Print Date: 10/23/2025
ST -2
page 1 of 1
54
BRAUN
INTERTEC
LOG OF BORING
the science you build on
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2508547
Geotechnical ical Evaluation
12th Avenue Reconstruction
12th Ave E, Canterbury Rd to Valley Park Dr S
Shakopee, Minnesota
BORING: ST -3
LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS.
DATUM: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Scott (US Feet)
NORTHING: 214169.5
EASTING: 463295.1
DRILLER: C. McClain
LOGGED BY: J. Hill -Male
START DATE: 10/03/25
END DATE: 10/03/25
SURFACE
ELEVATION: 758.9 ft
RIG: 7514
METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA
SURFACING: Bituminous
WEATHER: Clear
Elev./
Depth
ft
Description of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
Sample
Blows
(N -Value)
Recovery
qp
tsf
MC
%Tests
or Remarks
- 757.9
PAVEMENT, 5 inches of bituminous over 7
inches of apparent aggregate base /
9-8-8-8
(16)
18"
14-15-18-20
(33)
18"
10-10-11-12
(21)
18"
2-3-2
(5)
5)
18
2-3-3
(6),
18"
3-3-3
(6)
18..
8
5
6
4
P200=8%
Water not observed while
drilling.
_ 1.0
756.9
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace
Gravel, dark brown, moist /
- 2 0
-
_
- 751.9
FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP- -
SM), fine-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist
5-
- 7.0
-•:
- 749.4
•
POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM),
fine to medium -grained, brown, moist, loose —
(ALLUVIUM) -
- 9.5
-
- 744.4
::
::
POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to
medium -grained, light brown, moist, loose
(ALLUVIUM) —
-
-
— 14.5
—
-
-
END OF BORING —
15
Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings
20 -
25 -
30 —
B2508547
Braun Intertec Corporation
Print Date: 10/23/2025
ST -3
page 1 of 1
55
BRAUN
INTERTEC
LOG OF BORING
the science you build on
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2508547
Geotechnical ical Evaluation
12th Avenue Reconstruction
12th Ave E, Canterbury Rd to Valley Park Dr S
Shakopee, Minnesota
BORING: ST -4
LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS.
DATUM: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Scott (US Feet)
NORTHING: 214151.4
EASTING: 464280.0
DRILLER: C. McClain LOGGED BY: J. Hill -Male
START DATE: 10/03/25
END DATE: 10/03/25
SURFACE
ELEVATION: 755.4 ft
RIG: 7514
METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA
SURFACING: Bituminous
WEATHER: Clear
Elev./
Depth
ft
—
as (
J
Description of Materials
Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
Sample
Blows
(N -Value)
Recovery
qp
tsf
MC
o
/o
Tests or Remarks
_
— 754.1
PAVEMENT, 7 inches of bituminous over 8
inches of apparent aggregate base —
13-12-13-15
(25)
18"
9-10-10-11
(20)
18"
4-6-6-7
(12)
18"
2-2-2
4
(4)
18
(3)
18"
2-2-2
(4)
18"
7
8
7
5
6
P200=14%
P200=3%
Water not observed while
drilling.
- 1.3
-
- 751.4
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace _
Gravel, dark brown to brown, moist
-
_ 4.0
- 748.4
FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-
SM), fine-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist 5-
_ 7.0
—
-10-z
-
-
- 740.9
POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to
medium -grained, brown to light brown, moist, —
very loose (ALLUVIUM)
102-2-1
-
-
-
— 14.5
—
-
-
END OF BORING 15—
Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings
20 -
25 -
30 —
B2508547
Braun Intertec Corporation
Print Date: 10/23/2025
ST -4
page 1 of 1
56
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Descriptive terminology of Soil
the science you build on
Based on Standards ASTM D2487/2488
(Unified Soil Classification System)
Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and
a
Group Names Using Laboratory Tests
Soil Classification
Group
Symbol
Group Name'
Coarse -grained Soils
(more than 50% retained on
No. 200 sieve)
Gravels
(More than 50% of
coarse fraction
retained on No. 4 sieve)
Clean Gravels
(Less than 5% finesc)
Cu ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3°
GW
Well -graded gravel'
Cu < 4 and/or (Cc < 1 or Cc > 3)°
GP
Poorly graded gravel'
Gravels with Fines
(More than 12% finesc )
Fines classify as ML or MH
GM
Silty gravel' F G
Fines Classify as CL or CH
GC
E F G
Clayey gravel
Sands
(50% or more coarse
fraction passes No. 4
sieve)
Clean Sands
(Less than 5% fines")
Cu, 6 and 1, Cc≤ 3°
SW
Well -graded sand'
Cu < 6 and/or (C, < 1 or C, > 3)°
SP
Poorly graded sand'
Sands with Fines
(More than 12% fines")
Fines classify as ML or MH
SM
Silty sandFG I
Fines classify as CL or CH
SC
Clayey sand'
Fine-grained Soils
(50% or more passes the
No. 200 sieve)
Silts and Clays
(Liquid limit less than
50)
Inorganic
PI > 7 and plots on or above "A" line'
CL
Lean clayKLM
PI < 4 or plots below "A" line'
ML
SiltKLM
Organic
Liquid Limit — oven dried
<0.75
OL
Organic clay K L M N
Liquid Limit — not dried
Organic silt I(L M o
Silts and Clays
(Liquid limit 50 or
more)
Inorganic
PI plots on or above "A" line
CH
Fat clay'
PI plots below "A" line
MH
Elastic silt'<LM
Organic
Liquid Limit - oven dried
OH
Organic clay '<L M'
<0.75
Liquid Limit - not dried
Organic silt I<L M Q
Highly Organic Soils
Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor
PT
Peat
A. Based on the material passing the 3 -inch (75 -mm) sieve.
B. If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add "with cobbles or boulders, or
both" to group name.
C. Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols:
GW-GM well -graded gravel with silt
GW-GC well -graded gravel with clay
GP -GM poorly graded gravel with silt
GP -GC poorly graded gravel with clay
D. Cu = Des / D10 Cc = (D30)2/ (D10 x D60)
E. If soil contains ≥ 15% sand, add "with sand" to group name.
F. If fines classify as CL -ML, use dual symbol GC -GM or SC-SM.
G. If fines are organic, add "with organic fines" to group name.
H. Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols:
SW-SM well -graded sand with silt
SW -SC well -graded sand with clay
SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt
SP -SC poorly graded sand with clay
I. If soil contains ≥ 15% gravel, add "with gravel" to group name.
J. If Atterberg limits plot in hatched area, soil is CL -ML, silty clay.
K. If soil contains 15 to < 30% plus No. 200, add "with sand" or "with gravel", whichever is
predominant.
L. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add "sandy" to group name.
M. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200 predominantly gravel, add "gravelly" to group name.
N. PI ≥ 4 and plots on or above "A" line.
O. PI < 4 or plots below "A" line.
P. PI plots on or above "A" line.
Q. PI plots below "A" line.
50
• 40
z
30
20
io
4
0
For classification of fine -drained soils
f
and fine-grained fraction of coax -grained
soils.
Equation of "A"—
Horizontal at PI
there PI = 0.73
Equation of 'Li"—
vertical at LL =
then PI = 0.9
line
= 4 to LL
(LL - 20)
line
16 to Pt
(LL - 8)
= 25.5,
= 7,
'
,' ,
�'
/
;
,
4 p'
,
/
Si -
t
t
iHORH
ML OR
OL
cr r L
- -
10 16 20 30 40 50 60
LIQUID LIMIT(LL)
DD
WD
P200
MC
OC
Dry density, pcf
Wet density, pcf
% Passing #200 sieve
Moisture content, %
Organic content, %
70
80
90
Laboratory Tests
qp Pocket penetrometer strength, tsf
qu Unconfined compression test, tsf
LL Liquid limit
PL Plastic limit
PI Plasticity index
10D
110
Particle Size Identification
Boulders over 12"
Cobbles 3" to 12"
Gravel
Coarse 3/4" to 3" (19.00 mm to 75.00 mm)
Fine No. 4 to 3/4" (4.75 mm to 19.00 mm)
Sand
Coarse No. 10 to No. 4 (2.00 mm to 4.75 mm)
Medium No. 40 to No. 10 (0.425 mm to 2.00 mm)
Fine No. 200 to No. 40 (0.075 mm to 0.425 mm)
Silt No. 200 (0.075 mm) to .005 mm
Clay < .005 mm
Relative Proportions', m
trace 0 to 5%
little 6 to 14%
with ≥ 15%
Inclusion Thicknesses
lens 0 to 1/8"
seam 1/8" to 1"
layer over 1"
Apparent Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils
Very loose 0 to 4 BPF
Loose 5 to 10 BPF
Medium dense 11 to 30 BPF
Dense 31 to 50 BPF
Very dense over 50 BPF
Consistency of Blows Approximate Unconfined
Cohesive Soils Per Foot Compressive Strength
Very soft 0 to 1 BPF < 0.25 tsf
Soft 2 to 4 BPF 0.25 to 0.5 tsf
Medium 5 to 8 BPF 0.5 to 1 tsf
Stiff 9 to 15 BPF 1 to 2 tsf
Very Stiff 16 to 30 BPF 2 to 4 tsf
Hard over 30 BPF > 4 tsf
Moisture Content:
Dry: Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch.
Moist: Damp but no visible water.
Wet: Visible free water, usually soil is below water table.
Drilling Notes:
Blows/N-value: Blows indicate the driving resistance recorded
for each 6 -inch interval. The reported N -value is the blows per
foot recorded by summing the second and third interval in
accordance with the Standard Penetration Test, ASTM D1586.
Partial Penetration: If the sampler could not be driven through a
full 6 -inch interval, the number of blows for that partial
penetration is shown as #/x" (i.e. 50/2"). The N -value is reported
as "REF" indicating refusal.
Recovery: Indicates the inches of sample recovered from the
sampled interval. For a standard penetration test, full recovery is
18", and is 24" for a thinwall/shelby tube sample.
WOH: Indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of
hammer and rods alone; driving not required.
WOR: Indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of rods
alone; hammer weight and driving not required.
Water Level: Indicates the water level measured by the drillers
either while drilling ), at the end of drilling ( 1E), or at some
time after drilling (r).
e
441
Sample Symbols
Standard Penetration Test
Modified California (MC)
Auger
Grab Sample
O
■
iso
a
Rock Core
Thinwall (Tw)/Shelby Tube (SH)
Texas Cone Penetrometer
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer
5/2021
57
APPENDIX C
12th Avenue Traffic Study
Feasibility Report
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project CIF -2026-001
58
voSpack
SOLUTIONS
Technical Memorandum
To: Micah Heckman, PE, City of Shakopee
From: Max Moreland, PE, PTOE
Date: October 31, 2019
Re: Traffic Assessment - Valley Park Drive & 12th Avenue
12th Avenue East in Shakopee is currently a four -lane undivided roadway between Canterbury Road and
Valley Park Drive. The intersection of 12th Avenue/Valley Park Drive on the east end of that corridor has
an atypical orientation. The primary purpose of this assessment is to determine the appropriate geometry
and traffic control of this intersection as well as to determine if 12th Avenue can be converted to a three -
lane road.
Study Area
The study intersection of 12th Avenue/Valley Park Drive is a three-legged intersection. There is a stop sign
on the westbound approach of 12th Avenue with southbound Valley Park Drive and eastbound 12th Avenue
free flowing. The eastbound approach includes a left turn lane and shared left turn -through lane. The
southbound approach includes a right turn lane and a left turn lane. The westbound approach has a shared
right turn -through lane. There is a 30 -mph speed limit on all approaches.
12th Avenue is a four -lane undivided road from Valley Park Drive to just east of the Canterbury Road
intersection. The eastern 12th Avenue leg at that intersection has one eastbound lane divided by a median
from two westbound lanes; a left turn lane and a shared through -right turn lane.
No sidewalks or trails are provided at the study intersection or along 12th Avenue.
No changes are currently programmed for this intersection or roadway.
Data Collection
To gain an understanding of current operations at the study intersection, various types of data collection
efforts were conducted.
Intersection video was collected at the study intersection under normal weekday conditions in October
of 2019. Using this video, a 48 -hour turning movement count was collected at the study intersection.
Based on this count, the peak hours in the study area were found to be from 7:15 to 8:15 a.m. and 4:00
to 5:00 p.m. These times encompass the a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour, respectively. Summaries of
the peak hour and daily volumes are provided in Figure 1. The complete traffic count is attached.
1 SE Main Street, #204, Minneapolis, MN 55414 • 888.859.9425 • www.SpackSolutions.com
59
Spack Solutions
2 of 8
Figure 1— Existing Volumes
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Traffic Assessment
Recent mid -block volume data was also provided by the City of Shakopee. Comparing counts at the study
intersection from 2018 to these newly collected counts, the overall daily volume around the study
intersection is just under four percent higher on the north and west legs and about 26 percent lower on
the east leg. With the east leg being a lower volume in general, the overall intersection volumes are similar
between the 2018 and 2019 counts.
In addition to traffic counts, sight distance observations were taken at the intersection. Proper sight
distance can reduce the possibilty of conflicts at intersections. According to the American Association of
State Highway and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO) A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and
Streets, 7th Edition (commonly referred to as the Green Book), the driver of a vehicle approaching an
intersection should have an unobstructed view of the entire intersection, including any traffic -control
devices, and sufficient lengths along the intersecting roadway to permit the driver to anticipate and avoid
potential collisions.
Intersection sight distances were observed at stop sign approach at the study intersection. Intersection
sight distance is distance provided at intersections and driveways to allow drivers to perceive the presence
of potentially conflicting vehicles and, when the appropriate gap in traffic is provided, to safely perform
their movement.
Intersection sight distance requirements are provided in terms of both a physical distance and a time gap
in the mainline traffic related to the speed of approaching vehicles. For approaching vehicles at any speed,
per Table 9-10 of the AASHTO Green Book, a passenger car stopped at an intersection requires a minimum
time gap of 7.5 seconds in either direction to complete a crossing movement across four lanes of traffic.
In other words, an average driver needs to see an approaching vehicle at least 7.5 seconds away to know
if they have sufficient time to complete a crossing movement. For single -unit trucks, the time gap rises to
8.5 seconds and for combination trucks, the time gaps increases to 9.5 seconds.
On the stop controlled east leg, five sight distance time measurements were made from a passenger
vehicle and it was found there is an average of 6.5 seconds of sight distance. This is shy of the minimum
time needed to make a through movement at the intersection. There is a monument sign and vegetation
on the northeast corner of this intersection that obstruct the view of on -coming traffic. Westbound
vehicles can pull forward beyond the stop sign to improve sight distance. The eastbound approach to the
60
Spack Solutions
3 of 8 Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Traffic Assessment
intersection has clear views of the other two approaches. The southbound approach has a clear view to
the west but the sign and vegetation impede the view to the east.
In addition to these measurements, the 12th Avenue corridor was driven in both directions. With no traffic
control between Canterbury Road and onto Valley Park Drive, no delays in travel time were recorded.
Based on information provided by the City of Shakopee, the 85th percentile speeds for vehicles on 12th
Avenue between Canterbury Road and Valley Park Drive are between 46 to 50 mph for eastbound vehicles
and 31 to 35 mph for westbound vehicles. On Valley Park Drive north of 12th Avenue, the 85th percentile
speeds are between 36 and 40 mph for northbound vehicles and 31 to 35 mph for southbound vehicles.
Crash Analysis
Crash information for the years 2017-2019 was provided by the City of Shakopee at the study intersection
as well as at the 12th Avenue/Canterbury Road intersection and the section of 12th Avenue between those
two intersections. Using this crash data as well as the traffic volumes at the study intersection, crash rates
were determined at each intersection. Volumes at the 12th Avenue/Canterbury Road intersection were
estimated based on available daily volume information from MnDOT.
At intersections, the observed crash rate is the number of crashes per million entering vehicles. This
formula uses the total traffic, crashes, and time frame to provide a standard format for comparison
between intersections. A measure to give context to a crash rate is to compare against the state averages
for similar types of intersections (in traffic control type and volume).
Another comparison tool is the critical rate, which is a statistically adjusted crash rate to account for the
random nature of crashes. An observed crash rate greater than the critical rate indicates that the
intersection operates outside the expected, normal range.
Table 1 summarizes the historic crash data and calculated rates at the two intersections.
Table 1— Intersection Crash Data (2017-2019)
Intersection
Intersection
Total
Crashes
Information
Entering
Vehicle
Volume
Observed
Crash
Rate*
State
Average
Crash
Rate*
Critical
Crash
Rate*
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
5
5,512
0.83
0.19
0.72
12th Ave & Canterbury Rd
12
19,425
0.56
0.40
0.93
*Rates are per million entering vehicles.
For roadway segments, the observed crash rate is the number of crashes per million vehicle miles. This
formula uses total traffic, crashes and segment length. It can also be compared against state averages for
similar types of roadways. Table 2 summarizes the crash data and rates along 12th Avenue.
Table 2 — Roadway Crash Data (2017-2019)
Location
Intersection
Total
Crashes
Information
Daily
Volume*
Observed
Crash
Rate**
State
Average
g
Crash
Rate**
Critical
Crash
Rate**
12th Avenue between
Valley Canterbury Rd & Park Dr
6
5,650
1.08
0.87
1.98
*Averaged between west and east ends of segment.
**Rates are per million vehicle miles.
61
Spack Solutions
4 of 8 Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Traffic Assessment
As shown in Tables 1 and 2, the 12th Avenue/Canterbury Road intersection and segment of 12th Avenue
between the two intersections have crash rates that are above state averages but within expected ranges.
The 12th Avenue/Valley Park Drive intersection has a higher than expected crash rate.
No fatal or incapacitating injury type crashes have been reported at any of these locations since 2017.
Daily Volume Analysis
While many factors contribute to a road feeling congested, the two biggest factors are volume, how many
vehicles are using the road, and capacity, how many vehicles the road can accommodate a day.
The City of Shakopee 2040 Comprehensive Plan classifies 12th Avenue and Valley Park Drive as collector
roads. Based on typical City of Shakopee roadway design guidelines listed in that same document, the
average daily traffic for an undivided four -lane roadway is 7,500 to 18,000 vehicles. For a three -lane
roadway, the average daily traffic is 4,000 to 16,000 vehicles.
Based on the Scott County 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the daily capacity of a three -lane road is 14,000 to
17,000 vehicles and the daily capacity of an undivided four -lane road is 18,000 to 22,000 vehicles.
The current traffic count at 12th Avenue/Valley Park Drive showed approximately 4,000 vehicles per day
on Valley Park Drive and 5,000 vehicles per day on 12th Avenue. The City of Shakopee 2040 Comprehensive
Plan forecasts year 2040 daily volumes of 4,400 vehicles on Valley Park Drive and 7,100 vehicles on 12th
Avenue.
Based on these volumes and the capacities listed, both 12th Avenue and Valley Park Drive are well under
capacity for four -lane roads. Their volumes are more in range with that of a three -lane road, while still
being under capacity for a three -lane road.
This suggests that both of these roadways would generally operate acceptably as three -lane roads (one
lane in each direction with a two-way left turn lane down the middle).
Looking at the crash history along 12th Avenue, two of the six crashes are potentially due to the four -lane
layout and could be avoided with the conversion to a three -lane road. Those two crash types were:
• An eastbound vehicle in one through lane sideswiping another eastbound vehicle in the other
through lane. With a three -lane road there would only be one through lane eliminating this type
of collision.
• An eastbound vehicle turning left into a business access being hit by a westbound through vehicle
in the outside lane after a westbound through vehicle in the inside lane stopped. With a three -
lane road there would only be one oncoming through lane for left turning vehicles to cross.
Peak Hour Analysis
To quantify traffic operations in terms of delays and vehicle queues capacity analyses are performed for
the study intersection.
Both existing and future operations were modeled. Existing operations used the existing turning
movement counts while future 2024 operations use forecast turning movement counts. To determine
future volumes at the intersection, the City of Shakopee 2040 Comprehensive Plan was referenced. Using
future traffic volumes for the area from that plan, a conservative annual growth rate of 1.0% was
determined for the intersection.
62
Spack Solutions
5 of 8 Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Traffic Assessment
The delay calculations were done in accordance with the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition using the
Vistro software package. The full calculations for each study scenario, including Level of Service (LOS)
grades and queue lengths, are attached.
Chart 1 shows the 95th percentile queue lengths on all approaches at the study intersection in the existing
and 2024 scenarios. Average delays are not calculated for intersections with side street stop sign control
because the vast majority of vehicles going through the intersection are on the main roadway and have
zero delay, which leads to low overall average delays. At side street stop sign controlled approaches to
busy roadways, the average delay for all vehicles on the approach often exceeds 60 seconds. This can be
the case for a few vehicles waiting at the stop sign where improvements would not be justified for the
low traffic volume. Based on our experience, improvements are not warranted at these types of
intersections until the 95th percentile queue at a stop sign is in the five to ten vehicle range.
Chart 1— Existing & 2024 Peak Hour Queues
12
1-51
v
X10 4.4.----4.4.4.4.4.4.4,4.4.4,4.4.4.4.4.-4.4.4.4.--4.4.4.4,--
LE
v
≥ 8
0
v
m
a) 6
(3
av 4
C
U • 2
Cr)
a •
_c 0
rn Southbound Left Southbound Right Eastbound Left Eastbound Through Westbound
AM Existing AM 2024
PM Existing
---1 PM 2024 --- Queue = 10 Queue = 5
As shown in Chart 1, with existing and forecast 2024 volumes, no significant queues occur or are forecast
to occur with the current intersection layout.
As previously mentioned, the current intersection layout is not typical. Looking at the crash history, three
of the five crashes are potentially due to the layout and could be avoided with a more standard
intersection. The five crashes recorded here were:
• Two southbound vehicles drover straight through the intersection into the culvert. If the
southbound approach were stop controlled and did not have two apparent through lanes, these
may have been avoided.
• An eastbound vehicle turned left from the outside lane and collided with an eastbound vehicle
going straight from the inside lane. If there were one eastbound left turn lane and a separate
eastbound through lane this type of crash is unlikely to occur.
• Two collisions with fixed objects (fire hydrant and snowbank). An intersection reconfiguration is
not likely to mitigate these crash types.
If the intersection layout were to be more typical with the eastbound approach having one left turn lane
and one through lane and the southbound approach having a left turn lane and a right turn lane, the three
crashes that were not with fixed objects could potentially have been avoided. That would put the crash
63
Spack Solutions
6 of 8 Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Traffic Assessment
rate of the intersection for the past three years in the expected range. Additionally, based on the daily
volume analysis, the number of lanes at the intersection could be reduced.
To test how the change in lane configurations would impact the study intersection, the forecast 2024
volumes were used in capacity analysis calculations. Figure 2 shows the existing intersection layout and
the layout used in this alternative analysis. The stop sign was moved to the north leg in the alternative
analysis to represent a more typical layout. Chart 2 shows the queue results of this alternative analysis.
12
L)
a)
LE 10
a)
a)
• 8
a)
a 6
a
• 4
au
• 2
rn ▪ 0
Figure 2 — 12th Avenue & Valley Park Drive Layouts
Chart 2 — 2024 Alternative Layout Peak Hour Queues
IM MI MI MD MI MI MD 41=1 MI MI MD
•
Southbound Left Southbound Right Eastbound Left Eastbound Through Westbound
AM 2024 - Alt PM 2024 - Alt
-- Queue = 10 Queue = 5
As shown in Chart 2, with the alternative layout at the study intersection, the future 2024 peak hour
queues are anticipated to be low suggesting no operational issues at the intersection.
Recommendations
12th Avenue/Valley Park Drive Intersection
Based on the analysis, it is recommended that the 12th Avenue/Valley Park Drive intersection be
reconfigured to have the alternative layout shown in Figure 2. This layout will still serve the
intersection volumes without significant queues or delays and will potentially reduce known collision
types at the intersection.
64
Spack Solutions
7 of 8 Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Traffic Assessment
Moving the stop sign to the north leg to have southbound traffic stop rather than westbound traffic
will make the control type more standard and recognizable to drivers. Though this will cause more
vehicles to have to come to a stop at the intersection than currently do, these southbound vehicles
are already slowing down to be able to turn at the intersection. Significant queues are not anticipated.
Based on sight distance needs, a relocation of the monument sign and vegetation on the northeast
corner of the 12th Avenue/Valley Park Drive intersection should be considered to allow good sight
lines between westbound and southbound vehicles at this intersection.
To make sure current drivers of the area are aware of these changes, it may be beneficial to include
temporary signage warning of the traffic control change as well as flashers on the new stop sign on
the north leg.
12th Avenue Corridor
Along with the intersection reconfiguration, it is recommended that 12th Avenue between Canterbury
Road and Valley Park Drive be converted to a three -lane roadway. This will tie into the new
intersection layout as well as be a more appropriate roadway layout for this section. With low volumes
and a number of driveways, a three -lane section will accommodate both through and left turning
vehicles. There are a number of closely spaced access points along this stretch of road that do result
in some overlapping left turn movements. See Figure 3 for an example of this. With a three -lane
section, overlapping left turns could result in vehicles using the center lane in opposing directions at
the same time. Without knowing the volumes of left turns onto the accesses along 12th Avenue, if it
is believed that there are areas with high volumes of opposing left turns making this type of head-on
conflict common, then the conversion to the three -lane section may not be appropriate.
Figure 3 — Overlapping Left Turns
A four -lane to three -lane change would not impact the 12th Avenue/Canterbury Road intersection as
12th Avenue becomes median separated with a westbound left turn lane at that intersection.
A three -lane roadway on Valley Park Drive could also be considered. With dual left turn lanes turning
onto southbound Valley Park Drive at TH 101, a transition period would be needed to the three -lane
section.
A concept level sketch of these recommendations is attached. The 12th Avenue/Valley Park Drive
intersection is shown with Valley Park Drive as both a four -lane and three -lane road.
65
Spack Solutions
Attachments
A. Recommendation Sketches
B. Traffic Count Data
C. Capacity Analysis Backup
8 of 8 Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Traffic Assessment
66
CD
Spack Solutions
N-
Q
J
Q
H
O
i-
OOOOO
OOOOO
OOOOO
OOOOO
OOOOO
coCcorNt coA
rLr,
N
M
1�
Cr N
r r
C)
M
.4-
.
Ci r
,-, Nr CC
r M
Eastbound
12th ave
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
o
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
0 0
0 0
O O
O O
O O
0 0
0 0
O O
O
O
0
0
O
O
O
CN N-
N
M
O
O O O
O O O
N,- N,
CO O,t
N N - N
O O O
O
O
O,
O
O O O O
O O O O
CO CO
r, 7r,co
CO N O,
O r O O
O
O
r
.- O O O
O O O O O
CO LO O N
co co
M.- CO N
O O O O O
Northbound
N/A
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O O O O
O O O O O
O O O O O
O O O O O
O O O O O
Westbound
12th ave
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
CO
If)
O
O
O O O
, , CO
In CO LC)
O O O
O O O
O
N
N
O
O
O O O O
N CO CO CD
M r r,-
O O O O
O O O O
O
O
O
O O O O O
CO CO CO N
CO M, .- N
O O O O O
O O O O O
Southbound
Valley Park Drive
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
O
0
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
,
N
O
CO
O
O O O
N In ,-
T T N,
O O O
CO T N- LO
O O O
O
LC)
O
O
O
O O O O
CO O) r,,
CO r CO r
O O O O
CO Ln CO
O O O O
O
O
O
N
O
O T O O ,-
CO
O) ,-, N-.
C, N CO
O O O O O
CO CO CO C'7
O O O O O
i=
2222
ui
o Ln o a
o -im ,r
00 CO CO CO
Hourly Total
9:00 AM
9:15 AM
9:30 AM
9:45 AM
Hourly Total
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
Hourly Total
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11:30 AM
11:45 AM
Hourly Total
12:00 PM
12:15 PM
12:30 PM
12:45 PM
Hourly Total
1:00 PM
1:15 PM
1:30 PM
1:45 PM
Hourly Total
2:00 PM
2:15 PM
2:30 PM
2:45 PM
Hourly Total
3:00 PM
3:15 PM
3:30 PM
3:45 PM
Hourly Total
Spack Solutions
r
W
a)
E
U)
a)
U)
U)
U
Ca
E
H
J
Q
H
H
CG O CO
CO O N O
r r r
r
L1
O
r O
r
t0 C)
C0LO
C)
i.,,,
0O C)
�p M
C) C)
M
I.
O
r
N N C) LC
M N N r
0O
d)
M r C)
LO N O r
N
O
r
M 0O
N r
M
N COO
r
r
r 0O
CON r
'
r
r
C) C)
r r
O
r 0
LO.
Lf)
c
O r O
C) L() CO
LA CO M N
N N N
O
Eastbound
12th ave
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 28 7 0 0
0 24 6 0 0
0 35 14 0 0
0 29 16 0 0
O
O
CO
CO
O
O O O O
O O O O
CO LO LO I`,
N, O CO
O O O O
O
O
N
N-
O
O O
O O
LC) ,
ON ,--,-
O O
O O
O O
, ,
O O
O
O
,_
O
O O O O
O O O O
, , LO CO
CO N N LO
O O,- O,-
O
O
.
T
O O O O
O O O O
r r r CO
I� O7 co
O O r O
O
O
CO
N
r
O O
O O
N_ Lo
r,
O O
O O
O O
, O
r N
O O
O
O
N
0O
O
O O O O
O O O O
, LO , r
r CO O O
O O O O
O
O
N.
O
O O
O O
CO CO
N r
O O
O O
O O
O O
r CO
O O
0 7 6 0 0
3 720 298 0 1
2 680 264 0 0
1 40 34 0 1
33.33% 5.56% 11.41% 0.00% 100.00%
Northbound
N/A
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
o
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
o O
O
O
O
O
O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O
O
O
O
o
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O O o O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
o O o O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
o
O
O
O
0
O O O OO
O
o o o o
O O O o
O O O o
0
O o O OO
O
Westbound
12th ave
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 0 24 10 0
0 0 13 9 0
0 0 12 5 0
0 0 13 13 0
O
c
N
CS)
O
O
0 0
N
CS)
r
O O
O O
0 0
, O
LO CS)
O O
O O
0
T
M
O
O
0 0
, r
O CO
O O
O O
0 0
CO O
O M
r r
O O
O O
0
O7
CO
O
O
0 0 0 0
LO N CO
COLO O r
O O O O
O O O O
0
r
O
o
0 0 0 0
T CO O N,
O N r CS)
O O O O
r o O o
0
M
r
O
r
0 0
O
M 0O
O O
o O
0 0
N r,
LO ,
O O
O O
0
CO
co
O
O
0 0 0 0
OT CO , LO
O7 O CS)
r r r
O O O O
O O O O
0
N
O7
O
O
0 0
N N
CO (S)
O O
O O
0 0
r O
r
O O
O O
0 0 19 5 0
1 0 384 220 0
1 0 360 162 0
0 0 24 58 0
0.00% 0.00% 6.25% 26.36% 0.00%
Southbound
Valley Park Drive
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 6 0 62 0
0 2 0 32 0
0 2 0 52 0
0 5 0 32 0
O
CO
r
O
LO
O
O O
0O
CS) N
O O
N O
O O
O O
LO O,
M N
O O
CO
O O
O
O
O
O
O O
r N
N r
O O
LC) N
O O
O O
N CS)
r r
O O
M M
O O
O
r
CS)
O
O
O O O O
Lc)r r
r
O O O O
N CO N
O O O O
O
r
N
O
O
O O O O
N co co co
N
O O O O
r co O r
O O O O
O
T
co
O
Lf)
O
O O
N O
O O
N N-
O O
O O
coN 0
O O
N LO
O O
O
N
O
O
N_
O
O O O O
LOM N,
O O O O
LO 0 0 0
O O O O
O
O
LO
O
O O
f�
O O
0 0
O O
O O
71" 71-
O O
0 0
O O
0 0 0 19 0
0 133 0 831 1
0 85 0 797 1
0 48 0 34 0
0.00% 36.09% 0.00% 4.09% 0.00%
C)
E
H
a a a a
cif, o Ln
o -im
Hourly Total
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
Hourly Total
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
Hourly Total
7:00 PM
7:15 PM
7:30 PM
7:45 PM
Hourly Total
8:00 PM
8:15 PM
8:30 PM
8:45 PM
Hourly Total
9:00 PM
9:15 PM
9:30 PM
9:45 PM
Hourly Total
10:00 PM
10:15 PM
10:30 PM
10:45 PM
Hourly Total
11:00 PM
11:15 PM
11:30 PM
11:45 PM
Hourly Total
DAILY TOTAL
Cars
Heavy Vehicles
Heavy Vehicle
Spack Solutions
N
2th Ave & Valley Park Dr
U o
o
4- i N
r
L- CO a Z N ,-
12)
i ca w o ce
>
CO o�a
}+aCZ • oQ
c
a) > Ts
E Q o
r t 2
iki
CO
N �
13;.'O,OOO
Wu
Osq O O O O
O c
p
O O
O O
O p
Op
p
o
O O
O c
O O
\ OJ
O O O
CU
Ma
s �
as OOoo
Northbound
O >o
a
O
O
o
O O
d
O O
dp L
E
Westbound
O
O
O O
O
O
H
-, O O O O
Ma
Eg
X 3 0 0 0 0
Southbound
O O
0 0
0
O
c; o
O O
PM Peak Hour
1� O O 0O
O N
T T
N �
73;.'O.OOO
W u
• O O O O
5
ora p f� CO CO
L
ti :4g
~
co Lo
- N N M N
O c
p
O O
s".""
O
O p
M ti M
O
O
O N �
r M M
O 4
O c
O O
•-z•,-; OJ
O O O O
ma
t
as �0000
O O
O
O O
d
O
▪ L O
5
O
OO
N
<,•) ti M
O
CO � •,rO
O 4
O
O
N
O O O O
a
m
NNNN
CO M Lo
oC �
N N
O O
O
O O
O
rn
o
X N
W �
N �.
U �
0
O
Southbound
U
� J o ti
To a�
U M
a
c
'1,3E .O
U Lo
> W
. O
2 U N
> W c
Westbound
7.
o
O
N
N
0O
CO
O
T
O
N
Lo OO
N
O
O
O
i
ca
U
N
.
O
CO
O
N-
O
1
r t
To
G
T
M
O
N
,
0O
O)
N
O
N
r
r
M
O
(6
U
O
N
W
CO
.
N
O
punognse3
c
u).O
N c r
U_ . N (NI
L N L O
> W r
c
g
to O
N 0O
U_
'X L N
> w N r
,.
go— iii,
2 U J M
H T . O N
L
c
Northbound
t
U
0
>
Spack Solutions
ler ii, Lulu
Northbound Eastbound
N/A 12th ave TOTAL
Straight Right Peds/ Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles Through Turns Bicycles
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 8
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 10
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 6
CD
N
CO CO
N r
N
U) MN
N
0
r r
N U)
N r
r
CO
O 0
r
O U)
r
M
O) r r N
r N CO
O Co,
N
r CO
CO ti
C
N
CO N
Lf) I,
N O
U) CO
N
O O
r d)
M N
r r
UD
O
lf)
O
O
CO
f�
O
O O O O
O O O O
CO . Lf)
r N
r ,— co LC)
O O O O
O
O
4
N
N
O
O O
O O
LC) N
r r
O O
O O
O O
,— LC)
r O
O O
O
O
M
M
O
O O
O O
M O
CO LO
O O
O O
O O
N— LC)
,— C9
O O
O
O
0)
Lo
O
O O O O
O O O O
CO N LO LO
O N. N
r CO
O O O O
O
O
Lo
CO
CO
O
O O O O
O O O O
, p� ,t ON
N— N
co LC) O,
N N
O O O O
O
O
LC)
CO
O
O O
O O
M
Op LO
r M
O O
O O
O O
O ti
LC)
N LC)
O O
O
O
(9.—
M
N
O
O O O O
O O O O
CA
.— N— N,
Lo O 0OLo
LC) LC) co ,
O O O O
O
O
00
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
I uesaay, ucto
Southbound Westbound
Valley Park Drive 12th ave
Straight Right Peds/ Straight Right Peds/
Time U Turns Left Turns U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles Through Turns Bicycles
12:00 AM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0
12:15 AM 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0
12:30 AM 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 0
12:45 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0
O
co
N
O
O
O O
N O
r r
O O
O O
O O
O N—
N N-
O O
O O
O
Cr)
LC)
O
O
O O
O O
CO N
O O
O O
O O
r 0,—
CO O
O O
O O
O
T
O
O
O O
.— N—
O N
O O
O O
O O
N— O
O O
O O
O O
O
CO
N
O
O
O O O O
0 0 0
ONO r
O O O O
O O O O
O
,-
CO
O
O
O O O O
O M.- .-
N r 0 LC)
O O O O
O O O O
O
LC)
0O
O
O
O O
, r
I"-
O O
O O
O O
r p
LC)
O O
O O
O
O7
N
O
O
O O
LC)
0O N
O O
O O
O O
N.
OO O,
O O
O O
O
N
O
O
O
O
r
O
O
O O
N LC)
O O
O M
O O
r O
O N
M
O O
N
O O
N-
O
M
O
O
O
O O
CO
O O
N r
O O
O O
T COM
r
O O
N N
O O
O
N
O
,
O
O O
O N
O O
N O
O O
O O
CD M
O O
O r
O O
O
O
CO
O
O O O O
N LC) CO O7
O O O O
O co
O O O O
O
N
N
O
O
O O O O
O CO CD
r r,
O O O O
co , Cfl
O O O O
O
'
O
O
O O
L[) CO
r r
O O
N M
O O
O O
r Cfl
r
O O
O N,
O O
O
O
LC)
O
O
O O O O
O M O CO
N N
O O O O
CO N.
O O O O
O
0O
CO
O
N
O
Hourly Total
1:00 AM
1:15 AM
1:30 AM
1:45 AM
Hourly Total
2:00 AM
2:15 AM
2:30 AM
2:45 AM
Hourly Total
3:00 AM
3:15 AM
3:30 AM
3:45 AM
Hourly Total
4:00 AM
4:15 AM
4:30 AM
4:45 AM
Hourly Total
5:00 AM
5:15 AM
5:30 AM
5:45 AM
Hourly Total
6:00 AM
6:15 AM
6:30 AM
6:45 AM
Hourly Total
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
Hourly Total
Spack Solutions
.M
W
a)
E
U)
U)
a)
U)
U)
U
Ca
E
F-
2th Ave & Valley Park Dr
ler ii, Lulu
Northbound Eastbound
N/A 12th ave TOTAL
Straight Right Peds/ Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles Through Turns Bicycles
0 0 0 0 0 0 51 27 0 0 131
0 0 0 0 0 0 45 17 0 0 101
0 0 0 0 0 0 25 9 0 0 61
0 0 0 0 0 0 30 19 0 0 75
CO CO
M
r t0
, ltd
, 0O
N
N
N
Co
M
O
M M
M
r M
If, C0
f�
CO CO
C)
0O
N
CO r
N r
r r
O r
O r
r r
M
l0
N f�
,,
f� CO
Co O
N
O
M
O Co
O ,
CO I,
O, CO
NNr
N d7
r C0
M CO
0O 0O
CO
M
O
O
LO
r
O
O O
O O
N
co r
O O
O O
O O
N —
LO M
r
O O
O O O
O O O
OA
07 0O N
CO,— r
O O O
O O
O O
co co
O M
r
O O
O
O
N
N
LC)
O
O O
O O
O
ti
r r
O O
O O
O O
r O
r O
M N
O O
O
O
CO
M
0O
O
O O
O O
,-,-
M N
M,
r O
O O
O O
O- ,-
tiLc>
M,
O O
O
O
COO
r
O O O O
O O O O
N- N N
N N— O
CO CO CO N
O O O O
O
O
CO
O
O O
O O
N
CO CO
O O
O r
O O
..—
N ti
LO ,
O O
r
O
CO
co
O
O O
O O
CO O
CO CO
CO r
O O
O O
O O
co N
CO 07
N N
O O
O
O
N
T
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
I uesaay, ucto
Southbound Westbound
Valley Park Drive 12th ave
Straight Right Peds/ Straight Right Peds/
Time U Turns Left Turns U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles Through Turns Bicycles
8:00 AM 0 1 0 22 0 0 0 20 10 0
8:15 AM 0 6 0 18 0 0 0 8 7 0
8:30 AM 0 3 0 10 0 0 0 11 3 0
8:45 AM 0 4 0 14 0 0 0 3 5 0
O
N
N
O
O
O O
r CO
CO CO
O O
O O
O O
LO CO
M
O O
O O
O
T
CO
N
O
O
O O
Lf) M
CD CD
O O
O O
O O
N M
CO
O O
O O
O
CO
07
T
O
O
O O
r N
r f�
O O
O O
O O
N N
CO r
O O
O O
O
LI7
C„
O
O
O O O O
CO L17
Lc, 0..— r
r O T T,
O O O O
O O O O
O
N
CO
O
O
O O
CO
co
O O
O O
O O
0O
N
CO r
O O
O O
O
N
M
N
O
O
O O
M
O ti
O O
O O
O O
CO
ti O
O O
O O
O
CO
CO
CID
O
O
O O
f� CO
CO CO
O O
O O
O O
CO Lf)
O
CO r
O O
O O
O
CO
N
O
O
O
CO
O
O
O O
rLc,
N r
O O
CO
O O
O O
r COL
r r
O O
LC) Ln
O O
O
O
CO
O
N
O
r O
r,
r
O O
N
O N
O O
O O,
r
O O
N
O O
r
M
O
,_
N
O O
O CO
N N
O O
O N
O O
O O
N O
CO
O O
CO N
O O
O
0O
O
O
O O
CO M
d'M
O O
O O
O O
M CA
M N
O O
M N
O O
O
,
O
CO
O
O O
07 CO
r r
O O
N LC)
O O
r O
0O O
r N,
O O
Or CO
O O
r
CO
O
O
O O
O7 CO
N N
O O
N
O O
O O
O N,
N r
O O
O O
O
CO
O
O
O O O O
CO O O O7
CDCOCOCO
O O O O
co CO M
O O O O
O
CO
O
co
O
Hourly Total
9:00 AM
9:15 AM
9:30 AM
9:45 AM
Hourly Total
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
Hourly Total
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11:30 AM
11:45 AM
Hourly Total
12:00 PM
12:15 PM
12:30 PM
12:45 PM
Hourly Total
1:00 PM
1:15 PM
1:30 PM
1:45 PM
Hourly Total
2:00 PM
2:15 PM
2:30 PM
2:45 PM
Hourly Total
3:00 PM
3:15 PM
3:30 PM
3:45 PM
Hourly Total
Spack Solutions
a)
E
U)
U)
a)
U)
U)
U
Ca
E
F-
2th Ave & Valley Park Dr
ler ii, Lulu
Northbound Eastbound
N/A 12th ave TOTAL
Straight Right Peds/ Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles Through Turns Bicycles
0 0 0 0 0 0 31 4 0 0 147
0 0 0 0 0 0 34 11 0 0 101
0 0 0 0 0 0 47 9 0 0 142
0 0 0 0 0 0 30 14 0 0 110
O
U)
CO
r 0O
O0O
ti 0O
M
Cn
CO
M 0
M M
CO f�
N M
f� CO0
r M
r
CO CO
Cf) r
CO CO
r r
NCO r
r N N
CA M
M M
N
r C)
U) N
N r
N r
%In
r
r N
O O
M r N r M 00 o
CO
U)117 `O CO
0O
O
O
co
co
N
.-
O
O O
O O
, co
CA N
, CO
O O
O O
O O
CA ,
N- N
O O
O
O
N
ti
N
O
O O
O O
C3) LO
r O
N
O O
O O
O O
N
CO ,
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
CO CO
, N
O O
O O
O O
CO O
, CO
O O
O
O
CA
N
O
O O
O O
r CO
N
T CO
O O
O O
O O
0
M
O O
O
O
CO
LO
N
O
O O
O O
N CO
CO
O O
O O
O O
, ,-
O O
O O
O
O
N
O
N
O
O O
O O
CO ,
N CO
O O
O O
O O
r r
O r
O O
O
O
CA
O
O O
O O
CO r
r
O O
O O
O O
O N
0 0
O
1 5 6 0 0
2 1879 792 0 1
2 1767 733 0 0
0 112 59 0 1
0.00% 5.96% 7.45% 0.00% 100.00%
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O O O 00
O
O O O 8
O
O O O 8
O
O O O 8
O
0
O O O 00
O
I uesaay, ucto
Southbound Westbound
Valley Park Drive 12th ave
Straight Right Peds/ Straight Right Peds/
Time U Turns Left Turns U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles Through Turns Bicycles
4:00 PM 0 6 0 71 0 0 0 22 13 0
4:15 PM 0 5 0 25 0 0 0 15 11 0
4:30 PM 0 4 0 56 0 0 0 18 8 0
4:45 PM 0 3 0 47 0 0 0 9 7 0
O
O
co
O
O
O
O O O O
Ln Ln N
co co N ,_N
O O O O
O O O O
O
O
(y)Li,
O
O
O O
M
CO CO
O O
O O
O O
N
CO CO
O O
O O
O
M
M
N
O
O
O O
N
CO
O O
O O
O O
r N
r
O O
O O
O
CA
O
O
O O
r
r
CO CO
O O
O O
O O
r r
CO ti
O O
O O
O
r
M
N
O
O
O O
LO O
O
O O
O O
O O
CO
r
O O
O O
O
N
N
CO
O
O
O O O O
O co co co
ti O O
r r r CO
O O O O
O O O O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O O O O
r co r O
N O LO O
O O O O
O O O O
0 0 16 5 0
0 0 645 367 0
0 0 598 278 0
0 0 47 89 0
0.00% 0.00% 7.29% 24.25% 0.00%
O
O
O
r
O
O O
COO M
O O
N r
O O
O O
CO
O O
O M
O O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
M N
O O
O O
O O
O O
M M
O O
O
O
O
r
O
O O
O O
r LO
O O
O O
LO CO
O O
M 0
r
O O
O
O
0
r
O
O O O O
N O N r
O O O O
N r N r
O O O O
O
N
O
O
O
O O
CO
O O
r r
O O
O O
Or CO
O O
M LO
O O
O
N
O
0
r
O
O O
CO
O O
CO N
O O
O O
M M
O O
O O
O O
O
O
LC)
O
O O
, CO
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O O
O r
O O
0 1 0 19 0
2 296 0 1528 3
1 231 0 1413 3
1 65 0 115 0
50.00% 21.96% 0.00% 7.53% 0.00%
Hourly Total
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
Hourly Total
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
Hourly Total
7:00 PM
7:15 PM
7:30 PM
7:45 PM
Hourly Total
8:00 PM
8:15 PM
8:30 PM
8:45 PM
Hourly Total
9:00 PM
9:15 PM
9:30 PM
9:45 PM
Hourly Total
10:00 PM
10:15 PM
10:30 PM
10:45 PM
Hourly Total
11:00 PM
11:15 PM
11:30 PM
11:45 PM
Hourly Total
DAILY TOTAL
Cars
Heavy Vehicles
Heavy Vehicle
Spack Solutions
MO
2th Ave & Valley Park Dr
(13
N M T T
CO N. CO O
T T T T
t• --
CO
^ to
O O
a)
O O O O
CU u
Csp O O O O
CL �
3 t FNN
ti
H � t
O c
p
O p
O O O
O p
N M
� � O
O
N •
O c
d p
\ pJ
O O O O
• m
s �
ap 50000
Northbound
O p
0
O
O p
00
O p
Up
Westbound
CO
LC) N
O
0 0
O p
H
• -, 0000
CU u
• 'm
O Cfl Nc▪ c
00
Southbound
O p
ti
M O
co
O 6
0
O
O
O �
O p
PM Peak Hour
b O O O O
cu
�, O O O O
a
m
1� T N
71. 0 71. %-
o O
O O • O
in O
O c
p
O p
co ti N
co O
LO
N
O c
d p
t
up 30000
6
C. 0
O p
00
O p
▪ L
3
O p
co ti (Y?
Lo
ti o
N
co
O
0
O p
H
N �
O O O O
a
m
t C r L[) CO I•-•
I� N LC)
CL �
71- CO
O p
0 0
CO L
M
co
co
O p
N
� O
�
W �
>
Southbound
CO
U
CO
(Ni
� o
To U J O
O LE
i— O .O N
c
u, a, .O
3 c U N
U 'i r
L yam+ L O•
U C r
> W C
u) o
N cp.0 M
U ., N OQ
X L O
N w O F
> C
Westbound
7.
C
H
ti
M
in
O
O
O
N
I
co
,
o
O
O
U
co
N
w
1.0
O
O
O
To
G
I—
T
N
O
eo
T
N
O
ti
0
N
I
N—
O
N
T
LS
O
i
(a
U
O
N
~
(,4
co
CO
0
punognse3
c
N � .O M
>W N N
LE
� .O
�:i
>w o N
E.
u) O
To co
U J ,
~ O c
O
Northbound
L
U
(a
O
Spack Solutions
J
Q
I—
H
M
CO O O
O CO CO O O~
CO N N Lf) N
T
O co co
N r r r
CO
01
r
N f�
r O
Lf�
CO r
N
r,
N N
N
N
N
CT, CO O.
CO LO CO
N
07
CG
r r..... r
f� LO O
0
N
N
O
r CO O
CD
`N
Eastbound
12th ave
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 3 1 0 0
0 4 2 0 0
0 2 2 0 0
0 2 2 0 0
O O O O O
O O O O O
r I�
fI-••••N r r
r co N O
O O O O O
O
O
C7
N
O
O O
O O
r
Ln
N r
O O
O O
O O
O M
0 LO
O O
O
O
CA
CO
O
O
O
Co
CA
O
O O O
O O O
O O r
f� r O)
O O O
O
O
N
O
O O
O O
Lo r
CO M
O O
O O
O O
Ln
M
O O
O
O
O
O
O
r
O
O O O
O O O
r N O
r r N
r N r
O O O
O
O
LCO
In
O
L.
O
O
O
r
O
O O O
O O O
O,r r r r
r
CO N CO co co
O O O
O
O
r
7,
r
O
O
O
O
N
O
O O O
O O O
N, r
CY) N CO
CO (7)
O O O
O
O
ti
O
N
O
Northbound
N/A
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O
O O O O O
O O O O O
O O O O O
O O O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O
O
O
O
O
Westbound
12th ave
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 0 1 0 0
0 0 2 1 0
0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 2 0
O O O O O
N r O O
M r CO O N
O O O O O
O O O O O
O
CO
O)
O
O
O O
r O
CO r
O O
O O
O O
r O
N N
O O
O O
O
N
CO
O
O
O
O
r
O
O
O O O
N r 0
O r O
O O O
O O O
O
CO
N
O
O
O O
O O
r CO
O O
O O
O O
O r
O r
O O
O O
O
r
LO
O
O
O
O
r
O
O
O O O
r r r
r N r
O O O
O O O
O
co
LO
O
O
O
CO
O
O
O O O
N r
CO CO CO
O O O
O O O
O
r
CO
O
O
O
7,
I..-
O
O
O O O
r N
O r O
O O O
O O O
O
O
O
Southbound
Valley Park Drive
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 1 0 2 0
0 1 0 3 0
0 1 0 0 0
0 2 0 1 0
O O O O O
CO f� CO CO N
O O O O O
LC) O CO LC) Lo
O O O O O
O
O
r
O
O O
I� CO
O O
r 0
O O
O r
r
O O
0 0
O O
r
N
O
r
O
O
CO
O
O
O
O O O
CO N M
O O O
O r
O O O
O
O
LO
O
O O
M M
O O
r r
O O
O O
r T
O O
CO
O O
O
CO
O
CA
O
O
CO
O
r
O
O O O
N
O O O
a) r r
O O O
O
O
N
O
O
N
O
LO
O
O O O
r r r
O O O
N N,
O O O
O
Lo
O
r
O
O
,-
O
O
O
O O O
N N LC)
O O O
CO C`7 I',
O O O
O
O)
O
r
O
a,
~
Q Q Q Q
N N N N
Hourly Total
1:00 AM
1:15 AM
1:30 AM
1:45 AM
Hourly Total
2:00 AM
2:15 AM
2:30 AM
2:45 AM
Hourly Total
3:00 AM
3:15 AM
3:30 AM
3:45 AM
Hourly Total
4:00 AM
4:15 AM
4:30 AM
4:45 AM
Hourly Total
5:00 AM
5:15 AM
5:30 AM
5:45 AM
Hourly Total
6:00 AM
6:15 AM
6:30 AM
6:45 AM
Hourly Total
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
Hourly Total
Spack Solutions
o
M
W
a)
E
U)
U)
a)
U)
U)
U
CO
L
F-
2th Ave & Valley Park Dr
J
O0
, Co CO co
r Co CO ti
C
Nr
r
CD Cr
f, 0Ch
cr
r
CO 11)r r
CO Cr Cr 1.0
r
O N
ID CD
r
CO COd0
0O
N
Nr r O
r O O
10
O O
O O
O
O O
O O
O
O O
O O
O
Eastbound
12th ave
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 61 27 0 0
0 31 14 0 0
0 36 12 0 0
0 26 18 0 0
O
O
r
O
O O
O O
O cD
0O
N r
O O
O O
O O
0O
Ln N
r r.
O O
O
O
M
07
O
O O
O O
N LO
M N
r r
O O
O O
O O
CO f�
M Ln
r r
O O
O
O
O
N
M
LC)
O
O O
O O
0p 0O
CO
r
r O
O O
O O
, M
r r
r O
N N.
O O
O
O
O
r
r
O O O O
O O O O
O,,r O,
r r r r
N CO CO M
CO M,,
O O O O
O
O
Lo
in
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
0 0
O O
O O
O O
O O
0 0
O O
O O
O
O
0
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
Northbound
N/A
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
Westbound
12th ave
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 0 16 10 0
0 0 6 12 0
0 0 8 7 0
0 0 9 7 0
O
O
CO
O
CO
O
O
O O
N r
N
O O
O O
O O
r M
N
O O
O O
O
0)
N
r
O
O
O O
r r
LC) I� L
O O
O O
O O
ti ti
O O
O O
O
0 r
O
N
O
O
O O
. r
r
O
O O
O O
O O
0.
O
r r
O O
O O
O
r
N
CY)
O
O
O O O O
CO CO N N
O 0O LO CO
r
O O O O
O O O O
O
M
O
CO
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
Southbound
Valley Park Drive
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 3 0 28 0
0 7 0 24 0
0 8 0 18 0
0 5 0 13 0
O
CO
CO
O
CO
O
O O
. M
r r
O O
M r
O O
O O
r ,
r r
O O
0O CO
O O
O
.
M
O
O
O O
LC)
O r
O O
Cfl
O r
O O
O M,
r r
O O
r M
O O
O
,
O
r
O O
M CO
N N
O O
r CO
O O
O O
O CO
M M`-
O O
CO
O O
O
N-
O
O
O O O O
Ln O r N
. M N
O O O O
Ln N CO
O O O O
O
CO
T
O
N
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
0 0
O O
O O
O O
O O
0 0
O O
O
O
O
0
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
H
o Lan o Lan
0, m ,r
00 CO 00 00
Hourly Total
9:00 AM
9:15 AM
9:30 AM
9:45 AM
Hourly Total
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
Hourly Total
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11:30 AM
11:45 AM
Hourly Total
12:00 PM
12:15 PM
12:30 PM
12:45 PM
Hourly Total
1:00 PM
1:15 PM
1:30 PM
1:45 PM
Hourly Total
2:00 PM
2:15 PM
2:30 PM
2:45 PM
Hourly Total
3:00 PM
3:15 PM
3:30 PM
3:45 PM
Hourly Total
Spack Solutions
)
M
W
a)
E
U)
U)
a)
U)
U)
U
ijE
Ca
E
F-
2th Ave & Valley Park Dr
J
O
H
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
N N N N
O
Eastbound
12th ave
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
O
O
O
O
O
00000
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O
O
O
O
00000
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O
O
O
O
00000
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O
O
O
O
00000
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O
O
O
O
00000
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O
O
O
O
00000
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O
O
O
O
00000
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
O
O
O
O
0
0000
O
c
O O o o
O
in co 0
o. co co
0
o
C . N°
r co
0
r r c, 8
O
Northbound
N/A
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O O O 00
O
O O o o
O O O o
O O O o
0
... 00
O
Westbound
12th ave
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
o O
O O
O O
O O
o O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O o o
O O O
O O O
O O O
O o o
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O o
O O
O O
O O
O o
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O o
O O
O O
O O
O o
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 265 131 0
0 0 240 97 0
0 0 25 34 0
0.00% 0.00% 9.43% 25.95% 0.00%
Southbound
Valley Park Drive
Straight Right Peds/
U Turns Left Turns
Through Turns Bicycles
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
0 0 0 0 0
1 181 0 768 1
0 146 0 701 1
1 35 0 67 0
100.00% 19.34% 0.00% 8.72% 0.00%
a•
E
H
a a a a
o is, o Ln
o m ,r
Hourly Total
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
Hourly Total
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
Hourly Total
7:00 PM
7:15 PM
7:30 PM
7:45 PM
Hourly Total
8:00 PM
8:15 PM
8:30 PM
8:45 PM
Hourly Total
9:00 PM
9:15 PM
9:30 PM
9:45 PM
Hourly Total
10:00 PM
10:15 PM
10:30 PM
10:45 PM
Hourly Total
11:00 PM
11:15 PM
11:30 PM
11:45 PM
Hourly Total
DAILY TOTAL
Cars
Heavy Vehicles
Heavy Vehicle
Spack Solutions
a)
E
U)
U)
a)
U)
U)
ijE
Ca
E
F-
2th Ave & Valley Park Dr
O
C)
4- i vi'
al RS N
L �Z t L
I- 02-0°
> • 0-0 o -O a
_v >5
i
co
nr
_c
W
E
U
> A
Q a
•
r O N
H
CO Ln O
N N I�
T T T T
O o
O O N
O
Ln
N �
O O O O
CU u
Csq O O O O
3 t dA
buD �
H � t
to
LO N O7
CO rn CO
to
O c
p
O p
O O O
O p
• M • M
r co
o
� � o
O Ln
N .
j
O c
O p
\ GJ
to
O O O O
cu
m
s
as 0000
Northbound
a �, o
a
m
O p
0 0
o
O p
,
O p
oa
O p
t C
r
C
to
to
N
CO
LO
O
co
Lc)
00 L.c)
N
O �q
0 0
O p
Southbound
▪ LA
LC, CO
NNNN
0C �
CO CO
PM Peak Hour
N �
�, O O O O
• O O O O
�O .da
ris O O O
N 00 CO LO
- CO CO
to
O c
p
O p
s".""
O
O p
ti M
Ln
o
M ti CO
LO CO O,
O
c
O p
-77., 3)
�, O O O O
a
m
t �
uo �0000
a • o
cu u
O p
0 0
O p
O p
oa
O p
t C
dA • E
to
to
N N
LC)
00
N
LO
O
CO
o
M LO
O N
0 0
O p
O \ \ O
Op 0 O O O O O
o O cu a u
m
� N
o
0
O p
O ti M
CO Ln
O O
O p
• Q Q Q Q
• Lf� o Lf ) o
7 M 7r. O
co
� LA
L[) O r N
CO ,r co N
0C �
LO N M
O p
0 0
CV
O L.
Cr)
O p
O
X �
W �
°'))
Southbound
Lc)
L U
N O
W L
O
O
U
L
>
ti
0
co
ti
>
ti
To N
U J O
c
N C U :�
N E U CO
L 2 .
> LT, LE'
L : W X COO
>
Westbound
73
r
Lo
C
C)
N
O
O
O
H
N
I
CO
N
O
O
O
U
1-
N
o
O
O
JIL•b4c4
t
(t)
7
r
Ali te
L3
G
i-
O
T
r
C
T
L()
O
Lf)
O
N
O
O
,
M
O
I
L
C3
U
O
r
a,
O)
co
o
o
punognse3
c
L LO
L t O
>LAS °' -
E
w °'`—
>
O
U J ,-
g t 00 N
L
U
O
O
Northbound
L
O O
C �
W
�
O
L
O
2`)
>
Spack Solutions
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VITRO
z:, s
SOLUTIONS
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Vistro File: C:\...\12th & Valley Park Vistro.vistro
Report File: C:\...\1 - AM Existing.pdf
Intersection Analysis Summary
Scenario 1 AM Existing
10/28/2019
ID
Intersection Name
Control Type
Method
Worst Mvmt
V/C
Delay (s/veh)
LOS
1
12th Ave & Valle Park Dr
Valley
Two-way stopHCM 6th
y Edition
WB Thru
0.155
15.1
C
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For
all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C1 Spack Solutions
82
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VITRO
z:1 Spack
SOLUTIONS
Control Type:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Period:
Intersection Setup
Two-way stop
HCM 6th Edition
15 minutes
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 1: 12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
Delay (sec / veh):
Level Of Service:
Volume to Capacity (v/c):
15.1
C
0.155
1 Name
Valley Park Dr
12th Ave
12th Ave
I
1 Approach
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
I
Lane Configuration
r
"ri
11".
Turning Movement
Left I Right
Left
I
Thru
Thru
I
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00 I 12.00
12.00
I
12.00
12.00
I
12.00
No. of Lanes in Pocket
0 I 0
0
I
0
0
I
0
Pocket Length [ft]
I
I
I
Speed [mph]
30.00
30.00
30.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes
Volumes
Name
Valley Park Dr
12th Ave
12th Ave
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
16
88
256
114
54
24
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
22.00
8.00
6.00
8.00
7.00
25.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
16
88
256
114
54
24
Peak Hour Factor
0.7910
0.7910
0.7910
0.7910
0.7910
0.7910
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h]
5
28
81
36
17
8
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
20
111
324
144
68
30
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C2 Spack Solutions
83
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VISTRO
z:, s
SOLUTIONS
Intersection Settings
Priority Scheme
Free
Free
Stop
I
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
I
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
I
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.02
I
0.15
0.05
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
8.46
I
15.11
12.86
Movement LOS
A
A
A
I
A
C
B
95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
0.06
0.03
0.00
I
0.00
0.76
0.76
95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
1.44
0.72
0.00
I
0.00
18.95
18.95
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
1.29
0.00
14.42
Approach LOS
A
A
B
d_l, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
2.27
Intersection LOS
C
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C3 Spack Solutions
84
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VISTRO
1.4 Spack
SOLUTIONS
Lane Configuration and Traffic Control
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C4 Spack Solutions
85
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VISTRO
z:� Spack
SOLUTIONS
Traffic Volume - Base Volume
;.;r �IJ ! "Rf� . r f �Ja vJ'� Jag J ,fir I Y sl
I
256 —'
114 —pi.
- 24
54
CO
co
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C5 Spack Solutions
86
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VITRO
z:, s
SOLUTIONS
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Vistro File: C:\...\12th & Valley Park Vistro.vistro
Report File: C:\...\2 - PM Existing.pdf
Intersection Analysis Summary
Scenario 2 PM Existing
10/28/2019
ID
Intersection Name
Control Type
Method
Worst Mvmt
V/C
Delay (s/veh)
LOS
1
12th Ave & Valle Park Dr
Valley
Two-way stopHCM 6th
y Edition
WB Thru
0.148
13.7
B
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For
all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C6 Spack Solutions
87
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VITRO
z:1 Spack
SOLUTIONS
Control Type:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Period:
Intersection Setup
Two-way stop
HCM 6th Edition
15 minutes
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 1: 12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
Delay (sec / veh):
Level Of Service:
Volume to Capacity (v/c):
13.7
B
0.148
1 Name
Valley Park Dr
12th Ave
12th Ave
I
1 Approach
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
I
Lane Configuration
r
"ri
11".
Turning Movement
Left I Right
Left
I
Thru
Thru
I
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00 I 12.00
12.00
I
12.00
12.00
I
12.00
No. of Lanes in Pocket
0 I 0
0
I
0
0
I
0
Pocket Length [ft]
I
I
I
Speed [mph]
30.00
30.00
30.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes
Volumes
Name
Valley Park Dr
12th Ave
12th Ave
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
17
189
129
41
63
38
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
22.00
8.00
6.00
8.00
7.00
25.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
17
189
129
41
63
38
Peak Hour Factor
0.8370
0.8370
0.8370
0.8370
0.8370
0.8370
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h]
5
56
39
12
19
11
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
20
226
154
49
75
45
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C7 Spack Solutions
88
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VISTRO
z:, s
SOLUTIONS
Intersection Settings
Priority Scheme
Free
Free
Stop
I
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
I
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
I
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.02
I
0.15
0.06
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
7.85
I
13.69
11.02
Movement LOS
A
A
A
I
A
B
B
95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
0.05
0.02
0.00
I
0.00
0.76
0.76
95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
1.19
0.59
0.00
I
0.00
18.99
18.99
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.64
0.00
12.69
Approach LOS
A
A
B
d_l, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
2.95
Intersection LOS
B
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C8 Spack Solutions
89
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VISTRO
1.4 Spack
SOLUTIONS
Lane Configuration and Traffic Control
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C9 Spack Solutions
90
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VISTRO
z:� Spack
SOLUTIONS
Traffic Volume - Base Volume
;.;r '�IJ ! "Rf� . r f IJa 1J4 Jag J ,fir I Y sl
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
010 Spack Solutions
91
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VITRO
z:, s
SOLUTIONS
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Vistro File: C:\...\12th & Valley Park Vistro.vistro
Report File: C:\...\3 - AM 2024.pdf
Intersection Analysis Summary
Scenario 3 AM 2024
10/28/2019
ID
Intersection Name
Control Type
Method
Worst Mvmt
V/C
Delay (s/veh)
LOS
1
12th Ave & Valle Park Dr
Valley
Two-way stopHCM 6th
y Edition
WB Thru
0.170
15.7
C
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For
all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 3: 3 AM 2024
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C11 Spack Solutions
92
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VITRO
z:1 Spack
SOLUTIONS
Control Type:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Period:
Intersection Setup
Two-way stop
HCM 6th Edition
15 minutes
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 1: 12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
Delay (sec / veh):
Level Of Service:
Volume to Capacity (v/c):
15.7
C
0.170
1 Name
Valley Park Dr
12th Ave
12th Ave
I
1 Approach
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
I
Lane Configuration
r
"ri
11".
Turning Movement
Left I Right
Left
I
Thru
Thru
I
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00 I 12.00
12.00
I
12.00
12.00
I
12.00
No. of Lanes in Pocket
0 I 0
0
I
0
0
I
0
Pocket Length [ft]
I
I
I
Speed [mph]
30.00
30.00
30.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes
Volumes
Name
Valley Park Dr
12th Ave
12th Ave
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
16
88
256
114
54
24
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
22.00
8.00
6.00
8.00
7.00
25.00
Growth Factor
1.0510
1.0510
1.0510
1.0510
1.0510
1.0510
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
17
92
269
120
57
25
Peak Hour Factor
0.7910
0.7910
0.7910
0.7910
0.7910
0.7910
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h]
5
29
85
38
18
8
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
21
116
340
152
72
32
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 3: 3 AM 2024
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C12 Spack Solutions
93
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VISTRO
z:, s
SOLUTIONS
Intersection Settings
Priority Scheme
Free
Free
Stop
I
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
I
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
I
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.02
I
I
0.17
0.05
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
8.52
I
I
15.72
13.33
Movement LOS
A
I
A
A
I
A
C
B
95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
0.06
I
0.03
0.00
I
0.00
0.85
0.85
95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
1.54
I
0.77
0.00
I
0.00
21.25
21.25
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
1.31
0.00
14.98
Approach LOS
A
A
B
d_l, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
2.37
Intersection LOS
C
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 3: 3 AM 2024
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C13 Spack Solutions
94
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VISTRO
1.4 Spack
SOLUTIONS
Lane Configuration and Traffic Control
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 3: 3 AM 2024
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C14 Spack Solutions
95
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VITRO
1.4 Spack
SOLUTIONS
Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 3: 3 AM 2024
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C15 Spack Solutions
96
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VITRO
z:, s
SOLUTIONS
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Vistro File: C:\...\12th & Valley Park Vistro.vistro
Report File: C:\...\4 - PM 2024.pdf
Intersection Analysis Summary
Scenario 4 PM 2024
10/28/2019
ID
Intersection Name
Control Type
Method
Worst Mvmt
V/C
Delay (s/veh)
LOS
1
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
Two-way stopHCM 6th
Edition
WB Thru
0.161
14.1
B
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For
all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 4: 4 PM 2024
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C16 Spack Solutions
97
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VITRO
z:1 Spack
SOLUTIONS
Control Type:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Period:
Intersection Setup
Two-way stop
HCM 6th Edition
15 minutes
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 1: 12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
Delay (sec / veh):
Level Of Service:
Volume to Capacity (v/c):
14.1
B
0.161
1 Name
Valley Park Dr
12th Ave
12th Ave
I
1 Approach
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
I
Lane Configuration
r
"ri
11".
Turning Movement
Left I Right
Left
I
Thru
Thru
I
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00 I 12.00
12.00
I
12.00
12.00
I
12.00
No. of Lanes in Pocket
0 I 0
0
I
0
0
I
0
Pocket Length [ft]
I
I
I
Speed [mph]
30.00
30.00
30.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes
Volumes
Name
Valley Park Dr
12th Ave
12th Ave
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
17
189
129
41
63
38
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
22.00
8.00
6.00
8.00
7.00
25.00
Growth Factor
1.0510
1.0510
1.0510
1.0510
1.0510
1.0510
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
18
199
136
43
66
40
Peak Hour Factor
0.8370
0.8370
0.8370
0.8370
0.8370
0.8370
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h]
5
59
41
13
20
12
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
22
238
162
51
79
48
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 4: 4 PM 2024
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C17 Spack Solutions
98
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VISTRO
z:, s
SOLUTIONS
Intersection Settings
Priority Scheme
Free
Free
Stop
I
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
I
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
I
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.02
I
0.16
0.06
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
7.87
I
14.14
11.28
Movement LOS
A
A
A
I
A
B
B
95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
0.05
0.03
0.00
I
0.00
0.84
0.84
95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
1.32
0.66
0.00
I
0.00
21.03
21.03
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.67
0.00
13.06
Approach LOS
A
A
B
d_l, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
3.05
Intersection LOS
B
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 4: 4 PM 2024
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C18 Spack Solutions
99
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VISTRO
1.4 Spack
SOLUTIONS
Lane Configuration and Traffic Control
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 4: 4 PM 2024
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C19 Spack Solutions
100
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VISTRO
1.4 Spack
SOLUTIONS
Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 4: 4 PM 2024
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C20 Spack Solutions
101
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VITRO
z:, s
SOLUTIONS
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Vistro File: C:\...\12th & Valley Park Vistro.vistro
Report File: C:\...\5 - AM 2024 Alternative Layout.pdf
Intersection Analysis Summary
Scenario 5 AM 2024 - Alt
10/28/2019
ID
Intersection Name
Control Type
Method
Worst Mvmt
V/C
Delay (s/veh)
LOS
1
12th Ave & Valle Park Dr
Valley
Two-way stopHCM 6th
y Edition
SB Left
0.099
23.8
C
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For
all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 5: 5 AM 2024 - Alt
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C21 Spack Solutions
102
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VITRO
z:, Spack
SOLUTIONS
Control Type:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Period:
Intersection Setup
Two-way stop
HCM 6th Edition
15 minutes
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 1: 12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
Delay (sec / veh):
Level Of Service:
Volume to Capacity (v/c):
23.8
C
0.099
1 Name
Valley Park Dr
12th Ave
12th Ave
I
1 Approach
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
I
Lane Configuration
1 r
i I
lh
Turning Movement
Left I Right
Left
I
Thru
Thru
I
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00 I 12.00
12.00
I
12.00
12.00
I
12.00
No. of Lanes in Pocket
1 I 0
0
I
0
0
I
0
Pocket Length [ft]
100.00 I
I
I
Speed [mph]
30.00
30.00
30.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes
Volumes
Name
Valley Park Dr
12th Ave
12th Ave
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
16
88
256
114
54
24
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
22.00
8.00
6.00
8.00
7.00
25.00
Growth Factor
1.0510
1.0510
1.0510
1.0510
1.0510
1.0510
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
17
92
269
120
57
25
Peak Hour Factor
0.7910
0.7910
0.7910
0.7910
0.7910
0.7910
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h]
5
29
85
38
18
8
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
21
116
340
152
72
32
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 5: 5 AM 2024 - Alt
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C22 Spack Solutions
103
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VISTRO
z:, s
SOLUTIONS
Intersection Settings
Priority Scheme
Stop
Free
Free I
Flared Lane
I
Storage Area [veh]
I
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
I
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
I
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.10
0.12
0.23
I
I
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
23.76
9.30
8.20
I
Movement LOS
C
A
A
I
A
A
A
95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
0.32
0.41
0.90
I
0.00
0.00
0.00
95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
8.10
10.34
22.56
I
0.00
0.00
0.00
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
11.51
5.67
0.00
Approach LOS
B
A
A
d_l, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
5.96
Intersection LOS
C
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 5: 5 AM 2024 - Alt
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C23 Spack Solutions
104
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VISTRO
1.4 Spack
SOLUTIONS
Lane Configuration and Traffic Control
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 5: 5 AM 2024 - Alt
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C24 Spack Solutions
105
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VITRO
z:� Spack
SOLUTIONS
Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
2 f IJ Jd as i J I •
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 5: 5 AM 2024 - Alt
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C25 Spack Solutions
106
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VITRO
z:, s
SOLUTIONS
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Vistro File: C:\...\12th & Valley Park Vistro.vistro
Report File: C:\...\6 - PM 2024 Alternative Layout.pdf
Intersection Analysis Summary
Scenario 6 PM 2024 - Alt
10/28/2019
ID
Intersection Name
Control Type
Method
Worst Mvmt
V/C
Delay (s/veh)
LOS
1
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
Two-way stopHCM 6th
Edition
SB Left
0.048
13.3
B
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For
all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 6: 6 PM 2024 - Alt
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C26 Spack Solutions
107
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VITRO
z:, Spack
SOLUTIONS
Control Type:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Period:
Intersection Setup
Two-way stop
HCM 6th Edition
15 minutes
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 1: 12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
Delay (sec / veh):
Level Of Service:
Volume to Capacity (v/c):
13.3
B
0.048
1 Name
Valley Park Dr
12th Ave
12th Ave
I
1 Approach
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
I
Lane Configuration
1 r
i I
lh
Turning Movement
Left I Right
Left
I
Thru
Thru
I
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00 I 12.00
12.00
I
12.00
12.00
I
12.00
No. of Lanes in Pocket
1 I 0
0
I
0
0
I
0
Pocket Length [ft]
100.00 I
I
I
Speed [mph]
30.00
30.00
30.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes
Volumes
Name
Valley Park Dr
12th Ave
12th Ave
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
17
189
129
41
63
38
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
22.00
8.00
6.00
8.00
7.00
25.00
Growth Factor
1.0510
1.0510
1.0510
1.0510
1.0510
1.0510
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
18
199
136
43
66
40
Peak Hour Factor
0.8370
0.8370
0.8370
0.8370
0.8370
0.8370
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h]
5
59
41
13
20
12
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
22
238
162
51
79
48
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 6: 6 PM 2024 - Alt
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C27 Spack Solutions
108
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VISTRO
z:, s
SOLUTIONS
Intersection Settings
Priority Scheme
Stop
Free
Free I
Flared Lane
I
Storage Area [veh]
I
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
I
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
I
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.05
0.25
0.11
I
I
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
13.34
10.15
7.83
I
Movement LOS
B
B
A
I
A
A
A
95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
0.15
1.01
0.38
I
0.00
0.00
0.00
95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
3.81
25.29
9.52
I
0.00
0.00
0.00
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
10.42
5.95
0.00
Approach LOS
B
A
A
d_l, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
6.63
Intersection LOS
B
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 6: 6 PM 2024 - Alt
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C28 Spack Solutions
109
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VISTRO
1.4 Spack
SOLUTIONS
Lane Configuration and Traffic Control
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 6: 6 PM 2024 - Alt
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C29 Spack Solutions
110
Attachment C - Capacity Analysis Backup
Generated with
Version 7.00-06
PTV
VISTRO
z:� Spack
SOLUTIONS
Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
2 f IJ Jd as i J I •
Valley Park Dr & 12th Ave
Scenario 6: 6 PM 2024 - Alt
Traffic Assessment
12th Ave & Valley Park Dr
C30 Spack Solutions
111
APPENDIX D
Preliminary Assessment Roll and Map
Feasibility Report
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project CIF -2026-001
112
PRELIMINARY -ASSESSMENT ROLL
2026 Street Reconstruction - CIF26-001
STREET
ASSESSMENT
$ 16,485.09
$ 69, 022.35
$ 86, 654.23
$ 16,771.79
$ 17,201.83
$ 19, 853.78
$ 34,188.64
$ 79, 522.64
$ 39, 922.59
Lo
co
•71-
C9
$ 9,174.31
$ 16, 843.46
$ 16,270.07
ASSESSED ACRES
co
N
co
co
O7
M
N
•71-.
N
N.
N.
N
4
p
.-
Ij
6
N
O
N
co
N
N
N
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
VALLEY PARK 12TH ADDN Lot 003 Block 002
RLS 175 Lot TCT Block 00A I EX P/O LYING W OF LINE COM
SE CO
VALLEY PARK 12TH ADDN Lot 001 Block 001
VALLEY PARK 12TH ADDN Lot 002 Block 002
VALLEY PARK 12TH ADDN Lot 003 Block 002
VALLEY PARK 12TH ADDN Lot 003 Block 002
VALLEY PARK 11TH ADDN Lot 001 Block 001
VALLEY PARK 11TH ADDN Lot 001 Block 002
VALLEY PARK 11TH ADDN Lot 002 Block 002
RLS 134 Lot TCT Block 00D I S 100' OF E 100'
CANTERBURY PARK 3RD ADDN Lot 002 Block 001
Block 001 Lot 002 VALLEY
Block 001 Lot 003 VALLEY
PROPERTY ADDRESS
4910 12TH AVE E
Shakopee, MN 55379
4250 12TH AVE E
Shakopee, MN 55379
4301 12TH AVE E
Shakopee, MN 55379
4870 12TH AVE E
Shakopee, MN 55379
4950 12TH AVE E
Shakopee, MN 55379
5200 12TH AVE E
Shakopee, MN 55379
4895 12TH AVE E
Shakopee, MN 55379
1187 PARK PL
Shakopee, MN 55379
5301 12TH AVE E
Shakopee, MN 55379
O 0
4241 12TH AVE E
Shakopee, MN 55379
4550 12TH AVE E
Shakopee, MN 55379
4600 12TH AVE E
Shakopee, MN 55379
PROPERTY OWNER
MICI HOLDING LLC
4910 12 AVE E
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379
FURN USA LLC
140 E HINKS N KS LN
SIOUX FALLS, SD 57104
CAPP INDUSTRIES LP
7951 12 AVE S
BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425
UD PROPERTIES LLC
4870 12TH AVE E
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379
AB GAGE SCHMITZ LLC
4950 12 AVE E
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379
BIRCH RIVER REAL ESTATE LLC
8708 WOOD CLIFF RD
BLOOMINGTON, MN 55438
OLP SHAKOPEE MN LLC
60 CUTTER MILL RD STE 303
GREAT NECK, NY 11021
DATACARD CORPORATION
1187 PARK PL
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379
INDUSTRIAL REALTY T
7505 METRO BLVD STE 520
EDINA, MN 55439
CENTERPOINT ENERGY RESOURCE
PO 1475
HOUSTON, TX 77251
STAG INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LLC
1 FEDERAL ST
BOSTON, MA 02110
SHRI DHAR HOTELS INC
2517 BRENTRIDGE ST W
SIOUX FALLS, SD 57108
SHAKOPEE HAWKEYE LODGING LLC
2706 JAMES ST
CORALVILLE, IA 52241
O
272120040
273170010
272120011
272120030
272120041
272120042
271760010
271760020
271760030
271480041
271550020
274220020
274220030
PRELIMINARY -ASSESSMENT ROLL
2026 Street Reconstruction - CIF26-001
STREET
ASSESSMENT
N
00
CV
N
CO
C
69-
CO
l• -
6
M
O)
N
N
69 -
$ 18,205.27
$ 69, 022.35
$ 56, 622.70
ASSESSED ACRES
N
co
Lo
N
co
co
O)
~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Block 00A Lot O -L VALLEY
Block 001 Lot 001 VALLEY
Block 001 Lot 002 VALLEY
VALLEY PARK 12TH ADDN Lot 001 Block 001
VALLEY PARK 19TH ADDN LOT 001 BLOCK 001
PROPERTY ADDRESS
O O
4300 12TH AVE E
Shakopee, MN 55379
4450 12TH AVE E
Shakopee, MN 55379
4241 12TH AVE E
Shakopee, MN 55379
5300 12TH AVE E
Shakopee, MN 55379
PROPERTY OWNER
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
485 GORMAN ST
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379
HHS LLC ATTN : AMY WEILER
140 E HINKS N KS LN
SIOUX FALLS, SD 57104
SRRT SHAKOPEE LLC
900 NORTH THIRD ST
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
STAG INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LLC
1 FEDERAL ST
BOSTON, MA 02110
QF 5 PARTNERS LLC
5300 12TH AVE E
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379
O
274220040
274360010
274360020
272120010
275200010
* 1/2 of total acreage is assessed on corner lots
N
CO
LCD
%-i
O
l0
IA-
LI)
N
00
M
00
714
„ 011011
IMP
r
4.-
t..
L.
N
N -
r
o
LI I
N
N
M
N
N
a
0_
LC)
O r
0
0
a)
O N
CN
0
£sa3) avow Aanaa3LNvo I
t
cc
a
0
4
C
4
DRAWN BY:
SHAKOPEE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
cf
Appendix E
Preliminary Engineer's Estimate
Feasibility Report
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project CIF -2026-001
116
City of Shakopee, MN
2026 FULL -DEPTH PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION
PROJECT: CIF -26-001
NO.
ITEM #
ITEM DESCRIPTION
UNITS
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
1
2021.501
MOBILIZATION
LS
1
$170,000.00
$170,000.00
2
2104.502
RELOCATE STREETLIGHT (REMOVE FROM SEQ BEFORE BIDDING)
EA
1
$3,000.00
$3,000.00
3
2104.502
REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
EA
8
$800.00
$6,400.00
4
2104.503
SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)
LF
300
$2.50
$750.00
5
2104.503
SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)
LF
800
$5.50
$4,400.00
6
2104.503
REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE
LF
72
$55.00
$3,960.00
7
2104.503
REMOVE SANITARY SEWER PIPE
LF
4
$50.00
$200.00
8
2104.503
REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER
LF
2285
$10.00
$22,850.00
9
2104.504
REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK
SY
10
$8.00
$80.00
10
2104.504
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
SY
20650
$5.00
$103,250.00
11
2104.504
REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT
SY
542
$17.00
$9,214.00
12
2106.507
EXCAVATION - COMMON (P)
CY
8605
$17.50
$150,587.50
13
2106.507
EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE
CY
1722
$33.00
$56,826.00
14
2106.507
SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)
CY
1722
$28.00
$48,216.00
15
2112.504
SUBGRADE PREPARATION
RDST
42.5
$400.00
$17,000.00
16
2211.509
AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5
TON
10325
$19.00
$196,175.00
19
2232.504
MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1" - 1-3/4")
SY
2161
$1.50
$3,241.50
20
2357.506
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT
GAL
1141
$3.00
$3,423.00
21
2360.504
TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2, C)(PATCHING)
SY
53
$34.00
$1,802.00
22
2360.509
TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C)
TON
6455
$88.00
$568,040.00
23
2401.503
TYPE J BARRIER CONCRETE
LF
60
$20.00
$1,200.00
24
2503.503
18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V
LF
72
$100.00
$7,200.00
25
2504.503
8" PVC PIPE SEWER
LF
28
$80.00
$2,240.00
26
2503.601
TEMPORARY BYPASS PUMPING
LS
1
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
27
2502.602
CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EA
3
$800.00
$2,400.00
28
2503.602
CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER
EA
9
$1,600.00
$14,400.00
29
2504.602
ADJUST VALVE BOX - WATER (ANY SIZE)
EA
7
$400.00
$2,800.00
30
2504.602
IRRIGATION SYSTEM REPAIR (INDUSTRIAL)
EA
16
$500.00
$8,000.00
31
2506.502
CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020
EA
6
$4,500.00
$27,000.00
32
2506.502
CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 60-4020
EA
6
$9,000.00
$54,000.00
33
2506.502
ADJUST FRAME RING & CASTING (ANY SIZE)
EA
3
$900.00
$2,700.00
34
2506.603
48" DIAMETER SANITARY MANHOLE
EA
1
$5,500.00
$5,500.00
35
2521.518
6" CONCRETE WALK
SF
150
$14.00
$2,100.00
36
2531.503
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (ANY TYPE)
LF
2285
$32.00
$73,120.00
37
2531.504
8" CONCRETE PAVEMENT
SY
111
$99.00
$10,989.00
38
2531.618
TRUNCATED DOMES
SF
19
$55.00
$1,045.00
39
2563.601
TRAFFIC CONTROL
LS
1
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
40
2564.618
SIGN
SF
100
$78.00
$7,800.00
41
2573.502
STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION
EA
16
$150.00
$2,400.00
42
2573.503
SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD CHIP
LF
200
$3.00
$600.00
43
2573.51
SEDIMENT REMOVAL VAC TRUCK
HOUR
10
$150.00
$1,500.00
44
2574.505
SOIL BED PREPARATION
ACRE
0.14
$5,000.00
$700.00
45
2574.507
TOPSOIL BORROW
CY
57
$66.00
$3,762.00
46
2575.504
SODDING TYPE LAWN
SY
683
$20.00
$13,660.00
47
2582.503
4" SOLID LINE PAINT
LF
107
$0.50
$53.50
48
2582.503
24" SOLID LINE PAINT
LF
210
$3.75
$787.50
49
2582.503
4" BROKEN LINE PAINT
LF
7656
$0.50
$3,828.00
50
2582.503
4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE PAINT
LF
1355
$0.75
$1,016.25
51
2582.518
PAVEMENT MESSAGE PAINT
SF
397
$4.50
$1,786.50
Subtotal $1,653,002.75
Contingency (10%) $165,300.28
Eng/Admin/Legal (20%) $363,660.61
Total $2,181,963.63
117
Appendix F
City's Special Assessment Policy
Feasibility Report
2026 Full -Depth Pavement Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project CIF -2026-001
118
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES
FOR
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
Adopted by Resolution No. 3735 on:
Amended by Resolution No. 3 802 on:
Amended by Resolution No. 3926 on:
Amended by Resolution No. 3991 on:
Amended by Resolution No. 4164 on:
Amended by Resolution No. 4244 on:
Amended by Resolution No. 4637 on:
Amended by Resolution No. 4787 on:
Amended by Resolution No. 4852 on:
Amended by Resolution No. 6333 on:
Amended by Resolution No. 6572 on:
Amended by Resolution No. 7025 on:
Amended by Resolution No. 7908 on:
January 19, 1992
May 18, 1993
December 21,1993
April 19, 1994
February 7, 1995
July 11, 1995
March 18, 1997
November 5, 1997
February 17, 1998
November 15, 2005
February 6, 2007
August 17, 2010
July 5, 2017
119
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I. General Policy Statement
SECTION II. Improvements Eligible for Special Assessment
SECTION 111. Initiation of Public Improvement Projects
SECTION IV. Public Improvement Procedures
SECTION V. Financing of Public Improvements
SECTION VI. General Assessment Policies
SECTION VII. Methods of Assessment
SECTION VIII. Standards for Public Improvement Projects
A. Surface Improvements
B. Sub Surface Improvements
SECTION IX. Policies of Reassessment
SECTION X. Assessment Computations
120
SECTION I
GENERAL POLICY STATEMENT
The purpose of this Assessment Policy is to establish a fair and equitable manner
of recovering and distributing the cost of public improvements. The procedures
used by the City of Shakopee ("City") for levying special assessments are those
specified by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 which provide that all or a part of the
cost of improvements may be assessed against benefitting properties.
Three basic criteria must be satisfied before a particular parcel can be assessed.
They are:
A. The land must have received special benefit from the improvement.
B. The amount of the assessment must not exceed the special benefit.
C. The assessment must be uniform in relation to the same class of
property within the assessment area.
It is important to recognize that the actual cost of extending an improvement past a
particular parcel is not the determining factor in determining the amount to be
assessed. However, in most cases the method for determining the value of the
benefit received by the improvement, and therefore the amount to be assessed,
shall be the cost of providing the improvement, as long as the cost does not exceed
the increase in the market value of the property being assessed. The entire project
shall be considered as a whole for the purpose of calculating and computing an
assessment rate. In the event City staff has doubt as to whether or not the costs of
the project may exceed the special benefits to the property, the City Council may
obtain such appraisals as may be necessary to support the proposed assessment.
The City must recover the expense of installing public improvements undertaken,
while ensuring that each parcel pays its fair share of the project cost in accordance
with these assessment guidelines. While there is no perfect assessment policy, it is
important that assessments be implemented in a reasonable, consistent and fair
manner. There may be exceptions to the policy or unique circumstances or
situations which may require special consideration and discretion by City staff and
the City Council.
This Assessment Policy is intended to serve as a guide for a systematic assessment
process in the City of Shakopee.
121
SECTION II
DEFINITION OF IMPROVEMENTS ELIGIBLE
FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
A. The following public improvements, authorized by Minnesota Statutes
429.021 are eligible for special assessment within the City of Shakopee:
1. Streets, Sidewalks, Alleys, and Curbs & Gutters
2. Watermain Systems
3. Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Systems
4. Street Boulevard Trees
5. Street Lights
6. Other Improvements
a. Acquisition and improvement of land and purchase of equipment for
parks, open space areas, playgrounds, and recreational facilities.
b. Acquisition and construction of parking lots.
c. Construction, reconstruction, extension, and maintenance of dikes and
other flood control works.
d. Construction, reconstruction, extension, and maintenance of retaining
walls and area walls.
e. Abatement of nuisances; including, but not limited to, draining and filling
swamps, marshes and ponds on public or private property.
B. The City of Shakopee also retains authority to recover, through special
assessment, the following maintenance costs:
1. Snow and ice removal from sidewalks.
2. Rubbish removal and litter pick-up from streets and sidewalks.
3. Weed elimination from street and private property.
4. Street lighting, sprinkling, dust treatment, surfacing and patching.
122
5. Care of trees and removal of diseased and/or unsound trees.
6. Removal of obstructions, signs or vegetation within the sight triangles of
intersections.
SECTION III
INITIATION OF PUBLIC IMIPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Initiation of public improvement projects can be undertaken in any of the three following
ways.
1. Public improvement projects may be initiated by petition of at least 35% of the
affected property owners.
Alley improvements require 50% of the affected property owners signing the
petition.
2. Public improvements also may be initiated by the City Council when, in its
judgment, such action is required.
A resolution ordering any Council initiated improvements requires a 4/5 vote,
rather than a simple majority.
3. Developer Request.
As allowed by the City of Shakopee Standard Developer's Agreement, a
developer of a proposed subdivision may petition the City Council to construct
the improvements and assess them. The City will not install improvements outside
the urban service area.
SECTION IV
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROCEDURES
The following is the general procedure which will be followed by the City Council for all
public improvement projects from initiation of such a project through certification of the
assessment role to the County Auditor. Formats for the various reports and resolutions
referenced in this section are made a part of the policies and procedures of the City of
Shakopee.
1. Staff reviews petition for submission to Council and submits petition to the
Shakopee Public Utility Commission for written comment on joint City/Shakopee
Public Utilities projects.
123
2. Council accepts or rejects petition. If accepted, Council orders preparation of
feasibility report. Projects are initiated upon Council's desire, citizen request or
other agency's request.
3. Staff prepares feasibility report, or reviews report submitted by other agency.
Sends report to the Public Utilities Commission for comment on joint City!
Shakopee Public Utilities projects.
4. Council accepts or rejects feasibility report. If accepted, Council orders public
hearing on the improvements.
S. Staff publishes hearing notice and mails notices to the affected property owners.
6. Council conducts public hearing and adopts or rejects resolution ordering
improvement to be constructed and advertisement of bids. Bonds to finance
project costs may be issued at any time after the improvements are ordered.
7. Staff prepares final plans, advertises for and opens
bids, prepares bid tabulation, and makes recommendation to City Council for
award.
8. Council awards contract based on the bids received.
9. Staff supervises construction, prepares payments, and once project is completed,
prepares assessment rolls.
10. Council reviews assessment schedule and orders assessment hearing.
11. Staff publishes hearing notice, malls notice of hearing date and proposed
assessments to the affected property owners.
12. Council conducts assessment hearing, adopts, revises, or rejects resolution
adopting the assessment roll. If adopted, Council authorizes certification of the
assessment to the County Auditor.
13. Staff certifies the assessments to the County Auditor.
124
SECTION V
FINANCING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
The City of Shakopee encourages public improvement projects as the area(s) benefiting
and needing such improvements develop. Examples of this policy can be seen through the
subdivision regulations, zoning ordinance, and building codes. New areas are required to
provide needed improvements and services before development, thereby not creating
unexpected hardships on the property owners purchasing such property nor on the general
public. However, it is recognized that certain areas of the City have developed without all
needed public improvements (e.g. - parks, water, sewer, and street improvements) and
that methods must be found to provide these improvements without causing undue
hardships on the general public or the individual property owner.
Special assessments are generally accepted as a means by which areas can obtain
improvements or services, however, the method of financing these is a critical factor to
both the City and the property owner. Full project costs spread over a very short term can
cause an undue hardship on the property owner and, likewise, City costs and systems
costs spread over a long period of time can produce an undue hardship on the general
public of the City.
It is the policy of the City to not defer assessments except in cases where senior citizens
are involved. The authorization for the senior citizen deferment and the criteria for
establishing eligibility are set forth in the Shakopee City Code, Section 2.82.
The City Council also may elect to defer assessments on undeveloped lands for a
specified length of time or until it develops. Terms and conditions of this deferral will be
established in the resolution adopting the assessments.
SECTION VI
GENERAL ASSESSMENT POLICIES
APPLICABLE TO ALL TYPES OF IMPROVEMENTS
The cost of any improvement shall be assessed upon property benefitted by the
improvements, based upon the benefits received. The following general principles shall
be used as a basis of the City's assessment policy:
1. The "project cost' of an improvement includes the costs of all necessary
construction work required to accomplish the improvement, plus engineering,
legal, administrative, financing and other contingent costs, including acquisition
of right of way and other property. The financing charges include all costs of
125
financing the project. These costs include but are not limited to financial
consultant's fees, Moody's fee, bond attorney's fees and capitalized interest.
When the project is started and funds are expended prior to receiving the proceeds
from a bond sale, the project will be charged interest on the funds expended from
the date of expenditure to the date the bond proceeds are received. The interest
rate charged will be the average interest rate earned by the City's investments
during the six months preceding the receipt of the bond proceeds. The interest
charged to the project shall be included as financing charges.
2. The "assessable cost" of an improvement is equal to the "project cost" minus the
"City cost".
3. The City of Shakopee will charge interest on special assessments at a rate
specified in the resolution. If bonds were sold to finance the improvement project,
the interest rate shall be two percent (2%) more than the average interest rate of
the bonds, rounded to the nearest quarter of a percent. If no bonds were sold, the
interest rate shall be set at the rate allowed by state law.
4. Property owners may pay their assessments in full interest free for a period of 30
days after the assessment hearing. After such period interest shall be computed
from the date specified in the assessment resolution. The City will certify each
year's collection (principal and interest) to the County Auditor by November 30.
Prior to the first certification of principal and interest to the County Auditor, a
property owner may make a partial pre -payment of the principal to the City of
Shakopee. Such partial prepayment must be at least $100.00. If the partial
prepayment is made after the 30 day "interest free" period allowed by state law,
interest will be charged on the amount of the partial pre -payment from the date
specified in the resolution and paid along with the partial pre -payment. After the
City of Shakopee has made the first certification of principal and interest to the
County Auditor, pre -payment will be accepted only for the total amount still
owing including interest. If a parcel has two or more separate special assessments,
pre -payment of the remaining principal balance may be made on one or more. Tax
exempt parcels such as churches and school properties may make a partial
prepayment at any time, with a minimum partial pre -payment of one half of the
principal balance. The tax exempt parcel will be allowed to make only one partial
pre -payment prior to the first certification to the County Auditor. The remaining
principal after the partial prepayment will be paid in equal installments over the
remaining term of the special assessments.
S. Where an improvement is designed for service of an area beyond that of direct
benefit, increased project costs due to such provisions for future service
extensions may be paid for by the City. The City will levy assessments to cover
126
this cost when a new improvement is installed as an extension of the existing
improvement. As an alternative, the City may assess these costs to the area of
future benefit immediately.
6. Where the project cost of an improvement is not entirely attributable to the need
for service to the area served by said improvement, or where unusual conditions
beyond the control of the owners of the property in the area served by the
improvement would result in an inequitable distribution of special assessments,
the City, through the use of other funds, may pay such "City cost" which, in the
opinion of the City Council, represents the excess cost not directly attributable to
the area served.
7. Because frontage roads along highways or other arterial streets are deemed to be
of benefit to commercial or industrial properties, the entire costs of any
improvement on such frontage roads shall be assessable to the benefitted
properties, even if only those properties on one side of such frontage roads are
benefitted.
8. If financial assistance is received by the City from the Federal Government, from
the State of Minnesota, the County or from any other source to defray a portion of
the costs of a given improvement, such aid will be used first to reduce the "City
cost" of the improvement. If the financial assistance received is greater than the
normal "City cost", the remainder of the aid will be placed in the Capital
Improvement Fund to be applied towards other City projects.
9. City -owned properties, including municipal building sites, parks and playgrounds,
but not including public streets and alleys, shall be regarded as being assessable
on the same basis as if such property was privately owned.
10. Improvements specifically designed for or shown to be of direct benefit to one or
more properties may be constructed by the City. The costs for these improvements
will be assessed directly to such properties, and not included in the assessments
for the remainder of the project. An example of this would be utility service lines
running from the main lines to the property.
11. Benefit Appraisals
In the event that City staff has doubt as to whether or not the proposed
assessments exceed the special benefits to the property in question (increased
property value as defined by State law), the City Council may order benefit
appraisals as deemed necessary to support the proposed assessments. As a general
rule, benefit appraisals shall be ordered when the proposed assessment exceeds
$5,000.00 for a standard Shakopee residential lot or $20,000.00 per acre
127
for commercial or industrial property. When there are extenuating circumstances,
additional benefit appraisals also may be ordered.
12. A property owner may elect to offset special assessments against condemnation
awards by executing a Net Assessment Agreement with the City Council.
SECTION VII
METHODS OF ASSESSMENT
A. GENERAL STATEMENT
There are different methods of assessment: per lot, adjusted front foot, and area.
For any particular project one of these methods will more adequately reflect the
true benefits received in the assessment area than the other methods. The City
Engineer, in his feasibility study to the Council, will recommend one or a
combination of these methods for each project, based upon which method would
best reflect the benefit received for the area to be assessed. The City Council will
select the preferred method of calculating the assessments at the time the project
is ordered.
B. POLICY STATEMENT
The following methods of assessment, as described and defined below, are hereby
established as the official methods of assessment in the City of Shakopee:
1. "Adjusted Front Footage" Method of Assessment
The "cost per adjusted front foot" shall be defined as the quotient of the
"assessable cost" divided by the total assessable frontage benefiting from the
improvement. For the purpose of determining the "assessable frontage", all
properties, including governmental agencies, shall have their frontages included
in such calculation.
The actual physical dimensions of a parcel abutting an improvement (i.e., street,
sewer, water, etc.) shall NOT be construed as the frontage utilized to calculate the
assessment for a particular parcel. Rather, an "adjusted front footage" will be
determined. The purpose of this method is to equalize assessment calculations for
lots of similar size. Individual parcels by their very nature differ considerably in
shape and area. The following procedures will apply when calculating adjusted
front footage. The selection of the appropriate procedure will be determined by
the specified configuration of the parcel. All measurements will be scaled from
128
A. Rectangular Interior Lots
The rectangular lot is defined as having no more than 2.0 feet difference
between the front and rear lot lines. The adjusted front footage is the
actual front footage of the lot. For rectangular lots whose frontage is
greater than its depth, the "odd shaped lot" method as explained next shall
be used.
B. Odd Shaped Lot
For odd shaped lots such as exist on cul-de-sacs and curved streets where
there is more than 2.0 feet of difference between the front and rear lot
lines, and where the lots frontage is greater than its depth, the "odd shaped
lot" method of determining the adjusted front footage shall be used. The
adjusted front footage shall be computed by dividing the area of the lot by
9,000 square feet to determine the equivalent number of front footage
units in the parcel. The number of units multiplied by 60 feet will give the
adjusted front footage. The area shall be computed to a maximum depth of
150 feet only. (Note: A standard City lot in the Original Plat of Shakopee
is 60' x 150' with an area of 9,000 square feet.)
C. Corner Lot Adjustment
Corner Lot Adjustment - Property zoned as Single/Twin Family corner
lots will only be assessed at a rate of 50% of the unit rate for the short side
of the lot in question for each street improved. If both streets are improved
simultaneously, 100% of the short side footage will be used. Property
zoned as Commercial, Industrial and Multi -Family will be assessed at the
unit rate for the side of the lot in question minus the front yard setback
distance, as stated for said property in Chapter 11 of the City of Shakopee
Code.
D. Zonal Assessment
When the street along the long side of a corner lot is improved, the cost
shall be assessed equally to all lots within 1/2 block in each direction of
the street improved. For this section, a block shall be defined as the
distance between adjacent, parallel paved or gravel streets. In the case
where there is only one parallel street adjacent to the street being
improved, the zonal assessment area shall be equal distance from the
improved street. This method may be selected rather than the corner lot
adjustment.
129
E. Double Fronting Lots
For double fronting lots, the lots will be assessed at 50% of the unit rate
for each street improved or 100% of the local street only.
2. "Area" Method of Assessment
When it has been determined to assess by the "area" method the area shall be
defined as the number of square feet or acres within the boundaries of the
appropriate property lines of the areas benefitting from the project. The
assessment rate (i.e. cost per square foot) shall be calculated by dividing the total
assessable cost by the total assessable area. On large lots, the City Engineer may
determine that only a portion of the lot receives the benefit and may select a lot
depth for the calculations equal to the benefit received.
For the purposes of defining assessable areas, all properties included in the
benefitted area, including other governmental areas, churches, etc. shall be
included in the assessable areas. The following items may not be included in area
calculations: public right-of-ways, natural waterway, swamps and lakes or other
wetlands designated by the MN/DNR. The City Engineer will make the
recommendation on the benefitted area in the feasibility report.
3. Per Lot Method
When it has been determined to assess by the "per lot" method, all lots within the
benefitted area shall be assessed equally for the improvements.
The "cost per lot" shall be defined as the quotient of the "assessable cost" divided
by the total assessable lots or parcels benefitting from the improvement. For the
purpose of determining the "lots" or "parcels" all parcels, including governmental
agencies shall be included in such calculations.
SECTION VIII
STANDARDS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS
The following standards are hereby established by the City of Shakopee to provide a
uniform guide for improvements within the City and also to be used by the City Engineer
in establishing "systems costs" as differentiated from "assessable costs" and "City costs."
Surface Improvements:
Surface improvements shall normally be interpreted to include all improvements visible
on or above the ground within the right-of-way, and includes, but is not limited to trees,
lighting, sidewalks, signing; street and accessary improvements such as surfacing, curb
130
and gutter, drainage facilities, grading, signalization; and other public improvements such
as drainage ponds and facilities, parking lots, parks and playgrounds.
Policy Statement
In all streets, prior to street construction and surfacing, or prior to resurfacing, all
utilities and utility service lines, (including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, water
lines, gas and electric service) shall be installed to serve each known or assumed
building location when practicable.
When practicable, no surface improvements to less than both sides of a full block
of street shall be approved except as necessary to complete the improvement of a
block which has previously been partially completed. Concrete curbing or curb
and gutter shall be installed at the same time as street surfacing, except that where
a permanent "rural" street design is approved by the City Council, curbs will not
be required.
Subsurface Improvements:
Subsurface improvements shall normally include such items as water distribution,
sanitary sewer and storm sewer lines and
electric and gas utilities.
For purposes of definition, main lines are defined as the publicly owned and maintained
lines such as trunk lines, interceptors, mains, laterals, etc. The service lines are those
privately owned service lines going from the main line to the property line.
Policy Statement
Subsurface improvements shall be made to serve current and projected land use.
All installations shall conform to City and Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
standards as established by those state and/or federal agencies having jurisdiction
over the proposed installations. All installations shall also comply, to the
maximum extent feasible, to such quasi -official, nationally recognized, standards
as those of the American Insurance Association
Service lines from the lateral or trunk to the property line for each known or
assumed building location shall be installed in conjunction with the construction
of the mains.
131
SECTION IX
POLICIES OF REASSESSMENT
The City of Shakopee in constructing or reconstructing any public improvement shall
design such improvement to last for a definite period. The life expectancy or service life
shall be as stated in the policy statement of this section, or if different, shall be as stated
in the Resolution ordering improvement and preparation of plans. When such project
needs renewing or replacement, the amount to be assessed against the property owner
shall be limited to an amount determined by dividing the actual life of the original
improvement by the expected service life of the original improvement.
Policy Statement
The following are hereby established as the "life expectancies" or "service lives"
of public improvements unless otherwise stated in the resolution ordering
improvement and preparation of plans, in which case, the life set forth in the
resolution shall govern.
1. Sidewalks - 20 years
2. Street improvements, including surfacing and curb and gutter - 20 years
3. Ornamental street lighting - 20 years
4. Water Mains - 30 years
S. Sanitary Sewers - 30 years
6. Storm Sewers - 30 years
SECTION X
ASSESSMENT COMPUTATIONS
A. STREET AND CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS
1. New Constructions
All new streets will be assessed 100% to the abutting benefitted properties.
Street and curb and gutter improvements will normally be assessed by the
adjusted front foot method, however other methods may be utilized if
conditions warrant it.
Cost of construction of streets shall be assessed based on the minimum
design of 36 feet wide, 7 -ton axle load in residential areas and 9 -ton axle
load in commercial and industrial areas. Oversizing costs which are
incurred in excess of the above may be paid by: (1) State Aid Funds, (2)
larger assessment rates to properties, (3) general obligation funds, or (4)
132
any other method or combination of methods authorized by the City
Council.
2. Collector Streets
Collector streets will be assessed to the equivalent local street costs. All
street oversizing costs associated with collector streets will not be
assessed.
3. Reconstructions/Reclamations
All street reconstructions and reclamations shall be 30% assessed.
4. Gravel Streets
a. Urban Areas
Upgrading an existing gravel street located in the Urban Service
Area by adding pavement, curb and gutter shall be considered new
construction and all costs assessed 100%.
b. Rural Areas
Only those items added to rural gravel roads by upgrading (i.e.
pavement, curb and gutter, etc.) will be assessed 100%, but not the
costs to replace the existing gravel roadbed. The City Council may
elect to revise the assessable areas to establish additional
assessment credits due to the large landowners abutting rural
gravel roads or for rural collector roads that have little or no direct
driveway accesses to it.
5. Overlay, Seal Coats
Bituminous overlay projects and bituminous sealcoats will not be
assessed.
6. Alleys
Upgrading existing gravel alleys by adding pavement will be assessed
100% to the block in question. Reconstructing existing paved alleys will
be 100% assessed also, except in the Central Business District (CBD).
For CBD alleys, the City Council will assess 30% of the alley
improvement.
133
B. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS
1. New Construction
New sidewalks installed adjacent to collector or arterial streets will not be
assessed. New sidewalks installed adjacent to local streets will be assessed
100% to the abutting property on which the sidewalk is located.
2. Reconstruction
Replacement sidewalks adjacent to local streets will be assessed 50% to
the abutting property owner and 50% City funded. Sidewalks that are
replaced next to collector or arterial streets will not be assessed.
3. Trails
Bituminous walkways or bicycle trails will not be assessed, but rather
funded 100% by the City.
4. New Plats
Sidewalks required within a new plat will be 100% assessed to the
developer.
C. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Storm sewer assessments shall normally be by the "area" method.
1. New Storm Sewer Construction
New storm sewer installed in conjunction with new street construction
where no storm sewer previously existed will be assessed 100% and be
included in the street assessment to benefiting properties. If the facilities
are oversized to accommodate drainage from areas outside the assessment
area, the City will pay for the oversizing from the Storm Drainage Fund.
2. Replacement of Storm Sewers
Any replacement costs or reconstruction of existing storm sewers will not
be assessed but rather funded 100% from the General Storm Sewer Utility.
134
3. New Plats
Storm drainage facilities installed by the City as a public improvement
project that serves developing property, shall be assessed 100% to the
developing properties. If
the facilities are oversized to accommodate drainage from areas outside
the plat, the City will pay for the oversizing from the Storm Drainage
Fund.
D. SANITARY SEWER ASSESSMENTS
This policy establishes the criteria for the determining the means of funding sanitary
sewer extensions through the application of assessments. The construction of sanitary
sewers within new developments may be funded privately with the application of trunk
fees and lateral connection fees applied in the Developer's Agreement. The Developer
may also petition the City for the construction of sanitary sewers within a new
subdivision as a Chapter 429 public improvement project.
In the case of petitioned improvements, 100% percent of the cost of construction of
laterals within the subdivision shall be assessed against the underlying property for the
proposed subdivision. In the event a sanitary sewer lateral provides trunk benefit the
City, the cost of the construction of an 8 -inch equivalent lateral shall be assessed to the
property receiving benefit.
The calculation of assessments shall be based on the following definitions:
• Trunk Sanitary Sewer — A trunk sanitary sewer represents an extension of the
City's sanitary sewer system across public and private property with the intent to provide
service across subdivision lines. A trunk sewer is intended to cross public owned or
undevelopable property without individual service or lateral connections.
• Lateral Sanitary Sewer — A lateral sanitary sewer shall be understood to be the
extension of a sanitary sewer (8 -inch) into a subdivision from the property line
connecting to the trunk sewer. A lateral sanitary sewer shall provide the opportunity for
the extension of other lateral lines and private service connections. In the case of a lateral
extension, it is the underlying property owner's responsibility to the extend the sanitary
sewer to the property line abutting the next upstream subdivision.
When it becomes necessary to provide a trunk sewer extension providing lateral benefit
to a property that requires installation of a pipe that is greater than the standard size and
deeper than 12 -feet at the property line for a respective development, assessments shall
be calculated for the installation of a standard pipe size and depth with the following
costs to be paid through the City's trunk fund.
• Oversizing — The incremental cost to provide the required pipe size greater than the
standard size as determined by the City shall be considered an oversizing cost and will be
paid for by the City from the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Fund. The cost to extend an 8 -inch
135
will be deducted from the total project cost and assessed to the property receiving lateral
benefit from the trunk sewer extension.
• Overdepth — The incremental cost to construct a lateral sanitary sewer to be
extended to another subdivision greater than a depth -necessary to serve the development
or 12 feet, whichever is greater, and the most upstream point of the lateral shall be
considered an overdepth cost and will be paid for by the City from the Trunk Sanitary
Sewer Fund. The cost of the installation of the pipe at a minimum depth of 12 feet will
be assessed against the property receiving benefit from the lateral extension.
In the event that a trunk sewer is to be extended across a new subdivision with the intent
to provide service to undeveloped property, lateral benefit shall be determined by the City
for determining the application of payment for that lateral benefit. Payment could consist
of an assessment or as a lateral connection charge.
In situations where a trunk sewer is extended across developable property that the cost
of the lateral benefit to that particular property be collected at the time of development
through a lateral connection charge or special assessment as approved by the City
Council.
In situations where sanitary sewers will be assessed, lateral sanitary sewers will be
assessed on a basis to be determined by the City Engineer.
Major trunk sewers or interceptors will be funded through charges to the entire drainage
basin benefited by the sewer. This will be collected as trunk charge or connection charge
in accordance with the City Trunk Sanitary Sewer Policy. Funds collected from this fee
shall be retained in the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Fund to be used for trunk related costs.
The replacement of existing sewers will not be assessed but rather paid for 100% by the
City using either the Sanitary Sewer Enterprise Fund or other funding sources identified
by the City Council. Should the nature of the development require upgrading of existing
pipes due to capacity limitations, the incremental cost between the existing pipe size and
the upgraded pipe shall be assessed to the development initiating the improvement.
Existing sanitary sewer service lines replaced, as part of a project that includes sanitary
sewer main line replacement, will not be assessed.
Individual service lines installed directly to specific properties will be fully assessed
directly to the benefited properties. Properties that have existing sanitary sewer services,
but do not have main line sewers adjacent, across or up to their property lines will pay
50% of the assessment rate for the new main line sanitary sewer with the cost associated
with replacing existing sanitary sewer service lines not assessed.
Any existing service line found to be defective, as part of a street reconstruction in which
the main line sewer is not being replaced, shall be replaced as part of the project and
assessed directly to the property.
136
E. WATERMAN ASSESSMENTS
Watermain assessment policies are established by the Shakopee Public Utilities
Commission and are not specifically addressed in this policy.
Generally, the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission policy indicates that new
watermains installed in areas that previously were not served by City water will
be assessed 100% to the benefited properties. The replacement of existing
watermains will not be assessed.
For new watermain, trunk watermain charges may also be added into the overall
project costs and assessed based on a determination by Shakopee Public Utilities
Commission.
Individual services installed to specific properties will be fully assessed directly to
the benefited property.
F. STREET BOULEVARD TREES
All street boulevard trees installed as part of new street construction or in
reconstructing existing streets shall be included as part of the overall project costs
and included in the assessment calculations.
G. STREET LIGHTS
All costs for new street lights installed as part of constructing new streets or
streetlights relocated as part of reconstructing streets will be included in the
overall project costs and included in the assessment calculations.
H. OTHER IMPROVEMENTS
Based on the City Council determination, all other improvements listed in Section
HA, Part 7 may be frilly assessed or assessed in part.
CITY COST PARTICIPATION ON COUNTY ROAD PROJECTS UNDER A
COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
On County Road Projects for which the City is required to participate in the cost of, the
following assessment rates will be applied to the abutting properties:
Street Construction 0%
Curb & Gutter 100% of City's Cost
Sidewalk 0%
Storm Sewers 0%
Utility Relocations (sewer/water) 0%
137
Driveway Entrances
Street Lighting
Bikeways/Trails
100% of City's Cost
0%
0%
J. BOX CULVERT CROSSINGS OF THE UPPER VALLEY
DRAINAGEWAY
Box culvert crossings of the Upper Valley Drainageway due to development will
be assessed to the developers at the local street equivalent. All costs necessary to
size the culvert at collector street width rather than local Street width shall not be
assessed.
K. TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
All costs associated with improvements constructed such as widening of a
roadway for turn lanes, additional driving lanes, diagonal parking and traffic
signalization shall be assessed 100% to the benefiting properties in commercial,
industrial and institutional zoned areas.
138
RESOLUTION R2025-128
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA RECEIVING A FEASIBILITY REPORT AND
CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE 12TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CIF -26-001
WHEREAS, a report has been prepared by the City Engineer, with reference to the 12th Avenue
Improvement Project, CIF -26-001, and this report was received by the Council on November 18th, 2025.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Feasibility Report for 12th Avenue Improvement Project, CIF -26-001, is approved.
2. The Council will consider the 12th Avenue Improvement Project and all appurtenance work in
accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting and benefited property for all or a portion of the
cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the
improvement for the 12th Avenue Improvement Project of $2,181,963.63.
3. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 16th day of December 2025,
at 7:00 P.M. or thereafter, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, at 485 Gorman Street, Shakopee, Minnesota,
and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law.
4. The work of this project is hereby designated as part of the CIF -26-001 Public Improvement
Project.
5. The City Council shall let the contract for all or part of the improvements as authorized by
Minnesota Statutes 429.041, no later than three years from the date of adoption of this resolution.
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 18th
day of November 2025.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Prepared by:
City of Shakopee
485 Gorman Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
139
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.c
November 18, 2025
Monthly Financial Report - October 2025
Nate Reinhardt, Finance Director
Action to be considered:
Review and October 2025 General Fund revenues and expenditures.
Motion Type:
Informational only
Background:
General Fund - October 2025 (see attachment)
Revenue variances (+/- 10% of target)
• Taxes will track below budget targets until the 2nd half tax settlement is received in
December.
• Licenses and permit revenues have exceeded their full year budget and are in line
with the previous year. This is primarily from building permits, as the city continue
to see growth.
• Charges for services have exceeded their full year budget primarily from
engineering fees related to private development. Recreation revenues are also
currently tracking ahead of their budget targets.
• Miscellaneous incudes interest earning on investments, have also exceeded their
full year budget amount.
Expenditure variances (+/- 10% of target)
• Total departmental expenditures are within the normal range and similar to last
year's percentage through October.
• Currently their are no departments that are over their budget target by greater than
10%.
Recommendation:
Informational only
Budget Impact:
N/A
140
Attachments:
2025.10 Monthly Financial Report- with Revenues.pdf
141
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Monthly Financial Report
01000 - GENERAL FUND
REVENUES:
* - TAXES
* - SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
* - LICENSES AND PERMITS
* - INTERGOVERNMENTAL
* - CHARGES FOR SERVICES
* - FINES AND FORFEITS
* - MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL REVENUES
EXPENDITURES:
11 - MAYOR & COUNCIL
12 - ADMINISTRATION
13 - CITY CLERK
15 - FINANCE
17 - PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
18 - FACILITIES
31 - POLICE DEPARTMENT
32 -FIRE
33 - INSPECTION-BLDG-PLMBG-HTG
41 - ENGINEERING
42 - STREET MAINTENANCE
44 - FLEET
46 - PARK MAINTENANCE
67 - RECREATION
91 - UNALLOCATED
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
OTHER FINANCING
* - TRANSFERS IN
* - TRANSFERS OUT
OTHER FINANCING TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
Key
YTD
2025
Budget
October October YTD Budget
2025 2025 Balance
Actual Actual Remaining
Percent
Used
23,446,450 13,244
17,000 0
3,810,750 393,031
5,430,000 893,032
5,236,800 288,164
325,200 22,712
537,100 2,455
38,803,300 1,612,639
(205,900) (7,028)
(2,726,280) (231,582)
(480,700) (31,723)
(1,166,950) (70,708)
(765,540) (78,192)
(694,300) (48,431)
(12,973,990) (990,705)
(4,448,100) (355,770)
(2,132,100) (146,405)
(1,430,500) (90,975)
(2,846,050) (128,918)
(607,800) (42,449)
(3,514,200) (268,085)
(5,558,990) (423,932)
(127,900) (715)
October YTD
2024
Actual
13,276,875 10,169,575 57% n, 11,701,648
11,859 5,141 70% 10,398
4,762,866 (952,116) 125% 4,700,111
4,567,202 862,798 84% 4,785,721
5,903,492 (666,692) 113% 4,569,202
273,368 51,832 84% 233,382
798,080 (260,980) 149% 657,198
29,593,741 9,209,559 76% 26,657,660
(155,898) (50,002) 76% (113,312)
(2,172,714) (553,566) 80% (2,021,207)
(344,772) (135,928) 72% (440,417)
(1,008,792) (158,158) 86% H (997,868)
(673,405) (92,135) 88% E (675,775)
(466,975) (227,325) 67% (483,852)
(10,341,972) (2,632,018) 80% _` (9,074,183)
(3,287,153) (1,160,948) 74% (3,372,919)
(1,935,921) (196,179) 91% (1,808,322)
(1,203,272) (227,228) 84% ::: (1,085,099)
(2,143,775) (702,275) 75% (2,099,752)
(404,999) (202,801) 67% (431,363)
(2,999,692) (514,508) 85% (2,760,121)
(4,755,803) (803,187) 86% (4,138,482)
(14,573) (113,327) 11% (12,829)
(39,679,300) (2,915,616) (31,909,715) (7,769,585) 80% (29,515,500)
876,000 0
0 0
750,000
0
126,000 86%
0 #DIV/0!
876,000 0
750,000 126,000 86%
0 (1,302,978) (1,565,974) 1,565,974
Varies more than 10% than budget positively
Varies more than 10% than budget negatively
Within 10% of budget
0
0
0
(2,857,840)
142
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.d
November 18, 2025
Accept Proposal from Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) Proposal for
Design and In -Construction Services for the 2026 Downtown ADA,
Lighting & Tree Rehabilitation Improvements.
Micah Heckman, Assistant City Engineer
Alex Jordan, City Engineer
Action to be considered:
Accept a proposal in the amount of $109,867 with Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) to
perform design and in -construction services for the 2026 Downtown ADA, Lighting & Tree
Rehabilitation Improvement Project (CIF -22-003).
Motion Type:
Approve
Background:
The 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) programs construction of the third phase
of the Downtown ADA, Lighting & Tree Rehabilitation Project, CIF -22-003, in 2026. In 2023,
the city completed a feasibility study that evaluated rehabilitating the City's downtown
lighting system, including replacement of street light poles, wiring and control panels. The
study also reviewed the downtown tree inventory for replacement and a condition
assessment of the existing paver maintenance strip along the back of the curb. As a
result, improvements have been further detailed and are proposed throughout
downtown Shakopee to reduce maintenance costs and eliminate safety concerns due to
deteriorating light poles. These improvements include lighting replacement, tree planting
and replacement of the pavers with concrete, matching recently completed
improvements in downtown.
Due to the size of the project, improvements will be constructed in phases. Phase 1,
which included Fuller Street and portions of 2nd Avenue, was completed in 2024. Phase 2,
which included Holmes Street from 1st to 3rd Avenue, is nearing completion. Phase 3,
which includes Sommerville Street from 1st to 3rd Avenue and a portion of 3rd Avenue
adjacent to the library parking lot, will be completed in 2026. The final phase will be
brought to council for review in a future year, consistent with the CIP.
SEH's proposal identifies scope of services and estimated costs to complete the
preliminary engineering, final design and in -construction services for the Phase 3
improvements. SEH has the experience, technical skill and capacity to provide the needed
143
services and is part of the City's approved consultant pool. The attached proposal
describes the scope of services and fees for their work on this project.
Recommendation:
Accept the proposal.
Budget Impact:
SEH's proposal to complete the design and construction services is based on a not to
exceed amount of $109,867. This work is budgeted in the approved 2026-2030 Capital
Improvement Plan and would be funded though the Capital Improvement Fund.
Attachments:
Downtown Lighting Improvements Phase 3 - SEH Proposal
CIP Sheet (CIF -22-003)
144
SEH
Building a Better World
for All of Us°
October 28, 2025
Mr. Micah Heckman, P.E.
Assistant City Engineer
City of Shakopee, Minnesota
485 Gorman Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Mr. Heckman:
RE: City of Shakopee, Minnesota
Downtown Lighting Improvements
Phase 3
SEH No. SHAKO 187469
Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal for providing electrical, lighting, and civil
engineering services for the third phase of the Downtown Lighting Improvements Project. This letter
serves as our understanding of the project scope and fee.
Scope of Work
The project described to us consists of providing construction documents that detail lighting and electrical
infrastructure design for the installation of new lighting systems along Sommerville Street from 1st Avenue
to 3rd Avenue and 2nd Avenue from Lewis Street to Sommerville Street.
The project will also involve associated civil work at the locations listed above, such as removal of existing
pavers, where present, and updating the pedestrian ramps to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Standards. In addition, pavers along the north side of 3rd Ave from Lewis Street to Sommerville Street will
be replaced with concrete. Tasks necessary for the solicitation of bids will be performed. Construction
observation will also be provided with the project.
The following items and/or tasks will be furnished and/or performed by SEH:
• Project kickoff meeting
• Provide topographic survey at southeast quadrant of Sommerville Street/1st Avenue intersection
to confirm ADA compliance of existing curb ramps and supplemental topographic survey at
Sommerville Street/2nd Street intersection and along north side of 3rd Avenue.
• Collect private utility mapping via Gopher State One Call
• Prepare CAD base files consisting of existing utilities, topography, surface geometrics, trees, and
above -grade infrastructure
• Coordinate with City to incorporate their tree replacement plan and details into construction
documents
• Coordinate with SPUC for locates and connections to electrical distribution infrastructure
• Prepare removal and proposed construction plans detailing the removal and installation of lighting
systems and permanent surfaces
• Prepare special provisions that incorporate standard City furnished front end specifications and
contract documents
• Prepare construction cost estimates
Engineers I Architects I Planners I Scientists
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 1 10650 Red Circle Drive, Suite 500 I Minnetonka, MN 55349-9229
SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com I 651.490.2000 I 800.325.2055 I 888.908.8166 fax
145
Downtown Lighting Improvements Phase 3
October 28, 2025
Page 2
• Provide 60% and 90% plan sets for City and SPUC review
• Prepare Advertisement for Bid and coordinate electronic bidding through Quest
• Conduct virtual bid opening, and tabulation of bids
• Attend preconstruction meeting
• Provide shop drawing and construction submittal review
• Provide construction staking for lighting
• Provide part-time construction observation for lighting installation (assumed at 10 hours per week
for 6 weeks)
• Provide final punchlist inspection and follow-up inspection
• Prepare asbuilt plans for new lighting systems
• Check contractor's applications for payment and change orders
It is our understanding that the following items and/or tasks will be furnished and/or performed by the City:
• Furnish as -built and construction plans associated with any known utilities along with recent and
original electrical systems within the project area
• Furnish available electronic base -plan and/or reference files (GIS and/or CAD files) including
geometrics and existing utilities to be used as background for plans
• Provide tree inventory plans and details for existing, missing, and proposed trees associated with
the downtown area for incorporation into construction documents
• Provide storm sewer structure inventory and recommended rehabilitation
• Determine and provide spot curb and gutter repair locations
• Engage with businesses as required during design and construction
• Provide signing plans as required for incorporation into construction documents
• Identify EV charging station locations and equipment if any
• Provide review and approval of construction documents
• Provide all construction observation, materials testing coordination, and punchlist inspection for
non -lighting construction
• Review, prepare, and process contractor's applications for payment and change orders
Assumptions:
• Topographic survey does not include storm and sanitary structure measuredowns
• Project will be locally funded only
• No private utility coordination tasks will be provided. Private utility maps received with Gopher
State One Call will be included in Project Manual appendix for Contractor's information only
• All meetings will be held virtually
• Attendance of City Council meetings is not required
• City reviews will be completed within one week of submittal
• Manhole and catch basin rehabilitation will consist of grouting structures or replacing adjustment
rings and castings only. Assumes full replacement of structures and/or main will not be required
• Lower Minnesota River Watershed District and NPDES Construction Stormwater permits will not
be required
• Weekly, on -site construction meetings are not included
• Construction materials testing services will be contracted by a third party directly with the City
146
Downtown Lighting Improvements Phase 3
October 28, 2025
Page 3
Schedule
Anticipated Project Schedule
Item No.
Item Description
Approximate Item Key
Milestone Date
1
Topographic Survey
November/December 2025
2
Submit 60% Plans
Late December 2025
3
Submit 90% Plans
Late January 2026
4
Bid Opening
March 2026
5
Construction
August -October 2026
Fee
The estimated not -to -exceed cost to the City for this scope of work is $109,867 and includes reimbursable
expenses. Please see the attached task hour summary.
Compensation for these tasks is based upon the actual hours worked for personnel assigned to the
project.
SEH will furnish Additional Services due to changes in the scope of services or as requested by the City.
We will provide an estimated fee for Additional Services as requested.
SEH can begin engineering services immediately upon receiving authorization to proceed.
We will provide these services in accordance with our Master Agreement for Professional Consulting
Services dated August 7, 2024.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide engineering services to the City. Feel free to contact me directly
at 952.912.2629, if you have any questions or comments regarding this proposal.
Respectively submitted,
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.
William Bauer, PE (fic. IA, MN, SD)
Project Manager/Client Service Manager
147
Downtown Lighting Improvements Phase 3
October 28, 2025
Page 4
Accepted on this day of , 2025
City of Shakopee, Minnesota
By:
Name
Title
c: Andrew Felber — SEH
https://sehincazure-my.sharepoint.com/personal/wbauer_sehinc_com/documents/documents/shakopee downtown lighting phase 3/downtown lighting improvements phase
3.docx
148
Prepared by: William Bauer
Reviewed By: Andrew Felber
SHAKO 187469
October 8, 2025
T
O
N
M
CO
--.9r-
in
M
O
O
M
O
QI:h
O
4
M
14
r-
O
N
M
U
CO
„-
Ilai
oes
= 0
3 N
0 =
_ O.
O x
v w
3
U)
I
H
=
E
a
N
c ,:,_
O '
a
._
M
co
s
,,
—
t
ui
3
�L♦
V IrD
ai s
V
V.
0
°°
.—
N
M
ao
N
v.
M
cc!
N
v.
CO
CO
=
w
-a
i
0
�)
_
w
-o
L
E
N
1
P
N
N
In
-
in
el
iii
,
T,}'
-
el
N.
1
H
'En
s
a�
H
L
N
T
M
E/}
N
N
N
N
ti
T
V
M
co
O
ti
co
i
.—
N—
N
N
W
Mi
_
5
u)
•L
2
Z
Kickoff meeting with Client
Kickoff meeting with SEH Staff
Design review meetings (60%, 90%)
Design team meetings
3
2
3
fn,
a�
LL
3
co
u)
L
U)
H
E
u)
gs
H
.
_
E
—
2
.2
c.)
C
0
Collect Data from Client (CAD, GIS, Photos, Reports, etc)
Design / Bid standards (recent proposal form, instructions to
bidders, general conditions, special conditions, standard
specifications, standard plates, CAD standards)
Utility Coordination Process
Conduct Utility One Call & Collect Utility Maps
Assumptions: Gopher State One Call maps will be included in
project manual appendix for information only. No utility
coordination tasks (meetings, relocation plans, etc) are
included.
3
2
3
a)
LL
3
Cl)
t
cn
:.:
O
O
O
H
Topographic Survey
3
.
3
a�
LL
3
V)
H
.CCD
m
E-
al
V
,U
O
Create project in accounting system
Develop PMP and QMP
Invoice management
3
2
a,
LL
a)
s.
4
149
Prepared by: William Bauer
Reviewed By: Andrew Felber
M
G)
y
R
a
a)
E
a)
O
Q
E
0)
0)
J
0
6-
c w
o.
o 0
R
• t
Q y
O ~
O
co O
SHAKO 187469
October 8, 2025
co
O
N
Lf>
co
v.
it
11>
O
O
r
20
�G
r
�O
r
O
r
I�
r
C7
N
r
O
CO
•
CD
MI
O
r
O
CO
r
CO
CO
•
O
N
CO
O
M
N
CO
CO
N
N
N
CO
CO
r
Cr,
r
CO
rco
•
CG
co
N
oes
C 0
3 N
C
Co.
O x
v W
3
U)
I
H
C
E
a
a)
c i
c D.
V c
V
a
s
V
1
co
L,
cL
V♦
V
a
co
0
c
L
CO
-
C?
N
CO
N
14
co
co
co
c
`�
6
�A
N
N
N
CO
N
N
N
Ch
o
0
Crc
co
C
w
L
('
co
O
M
O
to
N
M
M
O
Li
O
cr
Ce
CO
CO
CO
co
O
M
K}
M
CO
co
O
LA
EA
00
00
00
N
!OG
,
v.
N
O
CD
r
N.
O
CO
r
e.
L
iq
r
M
CO
V
H
U)
w
0
d
N
N
N
Cr,
M
O
to
I
N
N
O
M
O
r
CO
r
r
N
N
N
r
O
M
O
O
N
d
N
O
O
cc;
M
c
a>
.N
a3
0
I:
a
1,-)
ca
E
L
Reduce survey data into basemap (Create CAD BA file)
Incorporate available data info into basemap (Utility Maps, Data
Collection information, etc.)
Proposed Geometrics
ADA Compliance design
s
a>
J
L
N
Identify street lighting improvements
Identify connection points
Develop street lighting layout
Cost Estimating
60% Cost Estimate (based on quantity take off & bid items)
90% Cost Estimate
1
"-
co
E
L
3
2
N
H
cC
N
LL
N
H
c
C
EO
a
p
o
2
L
V
o
Title Sheet
Estimated Quantities, Notes, Standard Plates
Construction details/notes
Typical Sections
Removals, erosion control, and signing
Construction plans
_.
Sidewalk/Ped Ramps Intersection details
Quality control review
Constructability Review
Assumptions: Traffic control/phasing, SWPPP, and pavement
marking plans are not included
2
O
3
N
LL
O
3
V%
H
co
C
CT'
Review existing street condition
Review street lights condition and wiring configuration
Existing Conditions Photos, Video, etc.
m
150
Prepared by: William Bauer
Reviewed By: Andrew Felber
M
a)
y
R
a
a)
E
a)
0
0
E
0)
0)
J
0
6-
c
0
a)
C) y
0 0
0
CO O
SHAKO 187469
October 8, 2025
M
CON
r
r
CO
NCI
r
r
N
r
CO
ii.
tom
r
M
"titi
O
O
r
O
1p
CO
CO
NN
N
N
O
r
CO
r
06
= y
aN
=
_ O_
O K
v W
a
co
r
CNN
pp
CNN
s
V
a)
H
=
E
Q
N
N
N
r
r
a)
_ a
E 'c'e)
.)
a
1
i—
a
co
3
cVL♦ t
V
a
0
ar
w
12
O
N...,
p
0
I
•
N
00
VI
a1
_
w
LE
'^
V
p
CNCNCNCN
O
N
ch
O
co
r
N
co
s
H
L
CO
r
s
V
a)
H
L
w
N
•N
N
r
N
rPli
4
N
N
N
ID
in
I
O
419.
LiJ
a
r
r
CO
CO
agi
Prepare ad for bid & electronic bid docs
Respond to bid questions & prepare addenda
Attend bid opening
Prepare tabulation of bid and award recommendation letter
Prepare notice to proceed letter
2
"�
a)
LL
'�
i
g
I
E
a
N
g
N
2
a)
N
2
a)
.>
0
Q
=
0
0
i
c,)
a
Preconstruction meeting agenda, attendance, minutes
Review shop drawings
Create field quantity book
Create application for payment forms
Project management
Engineering Support
Review pay applications
a7
2
.Q
cn
u)
0
LL
s
cn
a)
i.
..
Front end documents
Bidding requirements
Contract forms
Conditions of the contract
Supplementary conditions
Special provisions
Technical specifications
Quality control review
'5
2
45
Z1
cn
t
a)
Lo L
15
s
cn
151
Prepared by: William Bauer
Reviewed By: Andrew Felber
SHAKO 187469
October 8, 2025
-$
O
r
0O
O
r
CO
O
O
b
co
O
O
O
r
CO
N
r
M
r`
M
Ln
O
M
0o
r
'�
CO
Ln
O,
N
CD
IS
O
r`
E
06
N
C C.
O �
2 W
3
U)
Z
O
CO
s
v
H
O
E
a
r
iG
M
r
EA
Ln
r
O
ti
in
EA
0)
C 0-
V c
V
a
s
H
CD
D
CO
N
O.
O
N
N
O
O
CN-
Eft
CO7
L
3
En
•:
C
w
•0
0
Eft
!Cr EA
co
Vi
EA
N
r0
r0
V.
N
O
CO
N
co
V'
0O
O
C)
0
W
L
O
M
CO
Eft
M
Q0
Eft
CD
_
CO
-'
r
r
r
ai N
CA
q.
O
0~O
R
r
3.
s
v
H
L
cA
V
a�
H
U)
LLI CL
d
N
N
C)
M
CO
EA
N
M
O
CO
0
icl:r
r
Eft
0
O
O
CO
M
EA
2
0
ig
4
O
O
C
O
Part -Time Observation
Assumptions: Assumes a 6 -week construction duration with
construction observation averaging 10 hours/week.
O
4,5
3
(/)(/)
C
U—
4,51
3
'p
L
a
Site closeout walkthrough & develop punchlist
Punchlist coordination
As built survey & structures
Complete as built drawings
Final application for payment & contractor closeout letter
1 year warranty walkthrough and follow up
O
To
3
cn
5
U—
To
r
3
cn
E
i
2
to
2
i-
O
cC
EU
V)
Gi
LL
N
2
i-
,
0
m
Create stakeout file / point files
Stake removals
Lighting & Electric
Curb and gutter
•
•
trgOL'
152
Prepared by: William Bauer
Reviewed By: Andrew Felber
M
G)
y
R
a
C)
E
C)
O
Q
E
0)
O,
J
cii-
o O
O
0
C) _
C) y
O `-
O
r..
CO V
SHAKO 187469
October 8, 2025
M
Tr
$7,884.331
00
CO
T
$30,620.36
206
$33,403.61
205
$37,958.71
642
O
O
r:
W
CO
CA
O
7,-
06
cs'su)
3 N
ii
c c,_
o v w
3
cn
cU
CI
H
C
.a
a
4 I I N/A
T
T
a
to
V/N
$1,036.65
V/N
V/N
$3,451.80
V/N
$4,488.45
N
$230.72
_
N
a
t0
T
c.1
$576.81
N
Tr
T
N
M
Trin
T
T
a
in
s
U
t
3
co
co
co
cco
E;
20
$2,951.20
N
$4,131.68
3
aL
L
a
3
0
C
a
L
0
Co
$1,210.67
N
$3,026.68
N
M
M
Tr -
M
$1,675.35 I $1,141.69 I $421.87
000Ch
$12,515.54
$9,703.06
40
$5,624.96
N
N
16
N
N
.
I
ti
M
M
6
3
35
M
co
a
Tr
$652.39
000
$13,047.84
s
v
H
U)
s V °'
Hr,
U)
W
a
0
M
$6,329.10
NN
$4,095.30
C
$17,870.40
_
O
T
$29,970.15
$1,441.57
ti
$1,441.57
N
N
M
to
M
$952.37
N
$634.92
,
N
N
N
E
0
$2,558.53 I $1,584.77
T
T
$1,936.95
41
$7,219.53
CO
T
$3,169.55
79 1
$13,910.79
T
co
$1,860.75
CA
T
$4,419.29
r�
CT'
Task Hours Summary
Task Fee Summary
.F
.
Task Hours Summary
Task Fee Summary
N
c
cu
a
Task Hours Summary
Task Fee Summary
as
cg
co
a
t.)
C
O
.4.
_.
co
(is
Task Hours Summary
Task Fee Summary
E
Project Hours Summary
Project Fee Summary
13.
;
f
,....
Jr,
E
153
2026 thru 2030
Project Details
Shakopee, MN
Project #
Project Name
CIF -22-003
Downtown ADA, Lighting & Tree Rehab
Total Project Cost $4,531,000
Department Capital Improvements Fund
Category Street Construction
Status Active
Accounting Code 5926/6926-2024, 5977/6977-2025
Contact City Engineer
Type Improvement
Priority 1 - Have to do
Useful Life 30 years
Fund Capital Improvement Fund
Description
Replacement of the pavers and pedestrian curb ramps in the downtown area as well as streetlights, pedestrian lights and trees. The project will be completed in
segments (block by block) annually beginning in 2024. Note: Multiple streetlights were replaced as part of the 2017 Downtown Streetscape Project and two
development projects - the style of lighting used for those projects would be carried forward to match the replacement of the streetlights throughout the
downtown area. It should also be noted that a planning study was completed in 2022 to develop a coordinated project scope meeting the goals of Envision
Shakopee, the Park and Trails Master Plan, and the river park master planning. A street lighting feasibility study was done in 2022 as part of the preliminary
design and is attributed to the Prior expenditures for the project.
Justification
A streetlight condition report was performed in 2015 for the downtown streetlights. Out of the total count of 231 streetlights, 45 were missing, 73 were in good
condition, 76 fair, and 37 poor. There are two different pole styles: 171 concrete poles and 60 Corten steel poles. Many streets light poles have fallen and have
not been replaced due to unavailability of the lighting style. In addition, the wiring system has aged and many areas have been patched together to maintain a
working system. The feasibility report completed in 2022 identified the scope of the lighting replacement and estimated cost of the improvements. Additionally,
ADA compliance needs to be completed in the Downtown that will include replacing many of the pedestrian curb ramps. Sidewalk repairs will also be included as
part of the City's Sidewalk and Trail Inspection, Replacement, and Maintenance Policy. The block pavers will also be removed and replaced with concrete.
Prior Expenditures
2026
2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
2,265,000 Improvements
Engineering/Administration
Prior
2,265,000
1,000,700
Funding Sources
Capital Improvement Fund
Tree Replacement Fund
Total
132,300
1,133,000
1,000,700
132,300
1,133,000
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
2,001,400
264,600
2,266,000
Total
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
1,100,000 1,100,000 0 0 0 2,200,000
33,000 33,000 0 0 0 66,000
1,133,000 1,133,000 0 0 0 2,266,000
Budget Impact
The street lighting, paver and pedestrian ramp improvements will be funded by the CIF and the tree replacement will be funded by the tree replacement fund.
42
Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software
154
2026 thru 2030
Project Details
Shakopee, MN
Project #
Project Name
CIF -22-003
Downtown ADA, Lighting & Tree Rehab
Contact
Department
City Engineer
Capital Improvements Fund
Downtown Lighting, ADA
Tree Replacement Project
43
Produced Using Plan -It CIP Software
155
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.e
November 18, 2025
Final Plat of Arbor Bluff Third Addition
Mark Noble, Senior Planner
Michael Kerski, Director of Planning and Dvelopment
Action to be considered:
Approve Resolution R2025-126, approving the Final Plat of ARBOR BLUFF THIRD
ADDITION.
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
U.S. Home, LLC (dba, Lennar), applicant, & DRP MN 1, LLC, property owner, have made
application for Final Plat of ARBOR BLUFF THIRD ADDITION, for property located south of
Valley View Road and west of Independence Drive (extended south).
The applicant is proposing development of their third phase of a single-family residential
subdivision (Arbor Bluff Third Addition). This Final Plat would create 68 single family lots
and 1 outlot area. There will be significant open space dedicated to the city for public use
adjacent to the north and east of this phase of the project. This open space is composed
of a wooded bluff area that will include a system of trails totaling approx. 5,000 linear
feet. The City will review a grading permit for this site, including area within the bluff area,
to be conditioned that the applicant/developer replace any trees subject for removal
within the bluff/open space consistent with City Code requirements.
The project received PUD and Preliminary Plat approval on August 15, 2023 and Final Plat
approval of the first phase in December, 2023, and are now requesting approval of this
third phase as it is generally consistent with those approvals. Lennar provided a narrative
(attached), stating that their homes will include varying amounts of stone on front
facades and siding materials consist of lap siding, shakes, or board and batten. Other
architectural features available on selected facades include columns, gables, shutters,
accentuated window trim and fascia, and decorative roof brackets and cornices. Lennar
has stated that they will carefully plan the color packages of each home to avoid
monotony and to ensure a visually appealing streetscape.
City departments and other outside agencies were given the opportunity to review and
provide comments regarding this application. City Engineering provided a memo/red
156
lined drawings/comments that have been incorporated into the draft Resolution. SPU
commented that the applicant shall work with them to connect to the existing water and
electric utilities to provide comprehensive services to this property and adjacent
properties. City Planning included conditions of tree preservation and landscaping as
mentioned above, and development of the trail plan consistent with city staff
requirements.
Recommendation:
Approve requested action. The Planning Commission reviewed and recommended
approval of the PUD & Preliminary Plat at their August 3, 2023 meeting. This Third
Addition Final Plat is generally consistent with the PUD and Preliminary Plat.
Budget Impact:
N.A.
Attachments:
FP Resolution - Arbor Bluff 3rd Add.docx
Site Aerial.png
ARBOR BLUFF THIRD F P_redlines.pdf
Arbor Bluff 3rd Add Utilities - Redlines.pdf
Arbor Bluff Landscape Plan (redlines).pdf
Arbor Bluff Narrative (6-30-2023)_vl .docx
FP Arbor Bluff 3rd Add - Engineering Memo.docx
Stormwater Review Memo 10-30-2025.pdf
Erosion Control Review Memo 10-17-2025.pdf
157
RESOLUTION R2025-126
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF
ARBOR BLUFF THIRD ADDITION
WHEREAS, U.S. Home, LLC (dba, Lennar), applicant, & DRP MN 1, LLC, property
owner, has made application for Final Plat of ARBOR BLUFF THIRD ADDITION; and
WHEREAS, the property is legally described as: Outlot D, Arbor Bluff Second Addition;
and
WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the
Planning Commission on August 3, 2023, at which time all persons present were given an
opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that the
Preliminary Plat be adopted as conditioned by Ordinance O2023-013 and Resolution R2023-090;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and approved the Preliminary Plat on August 15,
2023; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Final Plat of Arbor Bluff on December 5, 2023;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Final Plat of Arbor Bluff Second Addition on
September 3, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Final Plat of Arbor Bluff Third Addition on
November 18, 2025; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota that the Final Plat of ARBOR BLUFF THIRD ADDITION is hereby
approved subject to the following conditions:
I) The following procedural actions must be addressed prior to the review and release of
the recording of a Final Plat:
A. Approval of title by the City Attorney.
B. Park dedication fees in the amount required by the City Code and adopted City fee schedule
shall be paid prior to the recording of the final plat.
C. Tree removal and new landscaping shall occur consistent with City Code Sections 151.112
(Landscape Requirements) and 151.113 (Tree Preservation Requirements).
D. Site development shall comply with the conditions noted in the City Engineering memo
dated October 28, 2025 (including compliance with red -lined plan review comments which
have been provided on the plans and plat). A draft invoice for engineering charges, fees,
and securities has been uploaded and will be finalized once the engineer's estimate is
1 of 2
158
provided for the future extension of Independence Drive and the future trail through Outlot
B (Arbor Bluff 2nd Addition).
E. A Construction Management Plan must be signed by the contractor and developer prior to
start of construction.
F. Submit retaining wall easement agreements as identified in the Engineering staff review
memo prior to final plat recording.
G. Submit temporary construction easement agreements as identified in the Engineering staff
review memo prior to final plat recording.
H. Prior to street and utility construction a Grading -Utility Permit must be obtained.
I. Construction and development of lots shall comply with the design standards of City
Code Section 151.034 (Urban Residential Zone) and the design aesthetics as expressed in
the applicant's narrative, except as specifically approved by PUD Ordinance O2023-013.
J. Comply with SPU standard terms and conditions, which includes the following: 1.
Standard Terms & Conditions signed; 2. Trunk Water worksheet complete, commission
approved, and fee paid; 3. Engineers Estimate of Watermain worksheet complete, Plan
Review & Inspection Fee paid; 4. Any oversizing calculated and commission approved;
and 5. MN Department of Health permit approval presented. 6. Redline plan review
comments have been submitted for revision and resubmittal. SPU required
documentation and payments must be completed prior to plan approval.
K. SPU needs to purchase a lot from the developer for the purpose of building a water
booster station to provide adequate pressure to the higher elevation development area.
This includes domestic and fire services. The booster station must be established prior to
issuance of building permits.
L. Fire hydrants shall be placed in accordance with local requirements and the Minnesota
State Fire Code.
Passed in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held on
the 18th day of November, 2025.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
Attested:
Richard Parsons, City Clerk
2 of 2
159
Arbor Buff Third Addition
AlifillUarilirl Jr!Ili
Tiedr._ ,y _i ir—e .-17312 AP A
BRr; it MIK 0 IMS& PAS.:.:_. ti 11 �-
_�� ? ir1r.:
',mu cm Fr -"I ; ; .1
4
i Kt
Noperthosi 3. M5
O.
Orr el .
lia', e" • VAS
i.„14117.:"
mos 4,,...Ji .1.1r,:_ =Air
=i i.I
6 =lir In
..,_...r , dlill4PMET111-F' °raw! JO
y' 'Pill - 1 'ir4 77 P711 n
�—
Iii,1 _ , ...
_ , i , , 6--gaii - f -ii.... i La
.., I sill. r 1 • . k
1I giT i_ . .
Ai -I
02
160
N
z
0
0
0
0
I'
I i
Ii
0
CITY COUNCIL, Shakopee, Minnesota
of Shakopee, Minnesota at a
This plat of ARBOR BLUFF THIRD ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the
S.A. 505.03 Subdv.2, we are
regular meeting thereof held this
Outlots D, ARBOR BLUFF SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof Scott County,
Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as ARBOR BLUFF THIRD ADDITION and does hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public
use the public ways and also dedicate the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat.
In witness whereof said DRP MN 1, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its
plat has been reviewed and approved this
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this
on behalf of the compan
of DRP MN 1, a Delaware limited liability
Scott County Surveyor
My Commission Expires
� O
O- T
p a
certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown
COUNTY RECORDER, Scott Co
O
Licensed Land Surveyor
My Commission Expires
N
f0
N
H
W
W
S
N
W
O
N
H
W
W
S
N
Z£'S£'
N �
�;
00
(�IVN'id ONn,-'g ��
1N3Wf1NOW ,11Nf10�
110�S ZZ 39?J Sll
bZ '�3S d0 ?J3N?J0�
M
F
PLANT SCHEDULE
KEY I COMMON NAME/Scent& name I ROOT I QUANTITYIINSTRUCTIONS
F,'
N
M
M
M
M
o�
N
cD
d
o�
N
M
a0
N
I�
N
Kip,
O r
M M N
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
N
m
cl
m
a'
m m m
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
m
o
o
-°
O
O
w
U
O
-O
U
C
O
`
.N
>
N
JO
LL,
5
O
U
w
p
a
w-
o
m
°
Lg -8o
0 Z
OVl
O
N
-O
O
N
O
C
N
N
O
W O
E
g
O
C
�
1 �
"
U
U
\
_Q
U
N
U
U
N
O
�
X
V
�
U
N
O
�
�U' O
L --,'
N
E t�
N
� N
U
''',J
U
U7
OJ
>
�
Q
\
O
O
o+
N
U
�
J N
� O >
Oi
Q
W
~
\
U
O
p
Y
H
Z
J
Q
cA
�
c
o
U�'
\
W
U
U N
N � N
Q
O
p
H
�
O
Z
'EP',
O
}
U
H
W
m
Y
Q
=
Z
U
�
�
O
U
"r1,_
_
cn
J
�
O
H
p
d
W
g
H
�
O
Z
0
J
j
�
�
O
m
N
Q
E9
Z
�
Q
�
W
Z
Or
W
U
?
s
d
m
=
U
�
'3,,
�
W
L
'L)
~
=
�
d
�
4
A
(n
d
fn
J
J
=
U
J
m
W c
LJ
\ �
W d
Z
d � _
Q
W � H
~ � p
= O U
Z [n
cfl
N
0
H
U
U
D
Z
O
z
W
JCt
(/) Z O N
w O
Z
1'1 LL o_
WH O co OW �'w
V I Ct W Q w O Q 1.4
' 2
�, L_> r7 O
0 L �. W ›- Lu
.4- CL
WZ Cl. ~OW 2
in u_
0 . 0w �� OOO Z
00-cnz�?~ O <
ZZ.N 4W 0 H
_IN,P7 0OLn W
--1 z.-,..--i_ I
lomPrzammil
lig411
1 ��� lg11
2rlr ��i�llU
rainirki, Az
r moo, irol
5'iHIIIEiI
4n
IIPI 11GI
MINE
IIII NMI
CAM "711;
ill '4n
MN 1111
MP! RS
Lb 411P
mil lids
ill PR
O II
Nis
mi ii
1
24
T
1 ?
— •r„f
f:�faNfi�rfaN�ltafar� �u��nR�O���p�/_ ���
�IfaNfif:1�N�1faN�I�N n
INE
INRIORIVILTAPILlimMirlibeg- 1„.„„11,*& ■■t'SamitIo ��'�f mtru \m I\: � ►i\i wi:� %ice
r, III
„mator:
.141.144
1*1
l,
, tit.. -N_.
....,.. 141),,iii
Ni, tau :Nor'
14* -- , tr.. . _„
;.,...„.„...„0„.\\
i„..,W461 0141,EVE
LENNAR
NARRATIVE: Arbor Bluff Single Family Residential Community
U.S. Home, LLC, dba Lennar, is pleased to submit this request for the Planned Unit Development and Preliminary
Plat of a proposed single-family community to be known as Arbor Bluff.
Existing Conditions
The subject property is located at 2512 Valley View Road about midway between Marschall Road and Mystic
Lake Drive. The site is 81.34 gross acres in size and is currently farmed agricultural land with a wooded bluff
area in the central portion of the site and a stream surrounded by woods at the southwest and southwest edges.
Four wetlands have been delineated on the site totaling 1.02 acres in size.
Development Overview
• Homes: The proposed community will consist of 196 single family homes (approximately 4.01
units/acre) of varying size and style.
• Infrastructure: The neighborhood will be served by public street and utilities.
• Wetlands & Ponding: Of the 1.02 acres of existing wetlands on the property approximately 0.11 acres
will be fully impacted and replaced with the purchase of credits, and the remaining 0.91 acres will remain
undisturbed. Stormwater ponds will be created on site for purposes of stormwater treatment.
• Landscaping: Trees will be planted along Valley View Road and Independence Drive to provide a
landscape buffer for the homes backing up to those roads. Boulevard and yard plantings will also be
installed per City Code requirements.
• Parks/Open Space/Trail: Lennar is proposing park dedication through fees in lieu of land. Arbor Bluff
will have 13.11 acres of open space dedicated to the City for public use. These open space areas are
composed of a wooded bluff area centrally located in the middle of the site and a lowland wooded creek
area in the southeast corner of the site. A system of trails, totaling 4,900 linear feet, will run through
the open spaces and link up with public sidewalks connecting the entire neighborhood.
• Parking: The community will be served by public streets with a curb -to -curb width of 34 feet. These
homes will contain 3 -car, or 4 -car garages which will be served by a minimum 25 -foot long driveway.
This means each lot could park a minimum of four or five cars.
• Developer/Builder: Lennar will act as both developer of the property and builder of the homes.
Proposed Homes and Architecture
(please see exterior renderings and floorplans)
The Landmark Series are one-story and two-story single-family homes with 3 -car or 4 -car garages and will be
located on 65 -foot wide lots. The Discovery and Venture Series are smaller two-story single-family homes with
3 -car garages and will be located on the 55 -foot wide lots.
Landmark Series
Lot Width: 65 feet
Beds: 4 to 5 bedrooms
Baths: 3 to 5 bathrooms
Garage: 3 -car or 4 -car
Sq Feet: 1,920 — 3,436
**Price: $590K - $700K
Discovery Series
Lot Width: 40 feet
Beds: 4 to 5 bedrooms
Baths: 3 to 4 bathrooms
Garage: 3 -car
Sq Feet: 2,400 - 2,600
**Price: $475K - $525K
Venture Series
Lot Width: 55 feet
Beds:
Baths:
Garage:
Sq Feet:
**Price:
**Pricing is estimated and subject to change based on current market conditions at time of sales.
3 to 4 bedrooms
3 to 4 bathrooms
3 -car
1,550 - 2,500
$450K - $500K
171
Lennar homes include varying amounts of stone on front facades and siding materials consist of lap siding,
shakes, or board and batten. Other architectural features available on selected facades include columns, gables,
shutters, accentuated window trim and fascia, and decorative roof brackets and cornices. Architectural
renderings are included with this submittal. Lennar's design team will carefully plan the color packages of each
home to avoid monotony and to ensure a visually appealing streetscape.
The varying tiers of single-family homes proposed for this community will attract a wide range of
demographics, including first-time home buyers, young to middle-aged singles, small families, divorcees, and
empty nesters. The public open spaces with trails which will connect into a larger regional trail system in the
future will cater to all these demographics.
Tree Preservation and Landscaping
Given the long-term use of the property has been agricultural much of the site is void of trees. The majority of
trees that do exist on the site are clustered on the central bluff and in the southwest and southeast corners. As
with most new residential developments Lennar is proposing the removal of some trees from the site. It is
estimated that 129 significant trees on the site will need to be removed to accommodate development of the
proposed community. Approximately 154 significant trees will be preserved through the dedication of open
space and general construction avoidance. Furthermore, there are hundreds of trees located on the site that
do not meet the definition of "significant" that will also be preserved.
In addition to tree preservation efforts Lennar will be planting at least two trees on each residential lot, as well
as additional boulevard tree plantings throughout the neighborhood and buffer trees along Valley View Road
and Independence Drive for a total of 456 new trees.
Description of Requests
Lennar is requesting a rezoning of the subject property from RR — Rural Residential to PUD — Planned Unit
Development which will provide flexibility and creativity in the homesite configuration which will result in an
efficient use of land through the preservation of trees, wetlands and land for open space dedication.
Shakopee Special Provisions for Planned Unit Developments
The following summarizes how the proposed community meets the criteria for granting a PUD.
➢ Consistent in all respects with the comprehensive plan and with City Code:
The Shakopee Comprehensive Plan guides the subject property Suburban Residential which permits
single-family residential as a primary use allowing densities between 3 to 6 dwelling units per acre.
Therefore, our proposed plan is in conformance with the Shakopee Comprehensive Plan.
➢ Compatibility with surrounding land uses:
Land uses surrounding the subject property include:
• North — single family homes (Pheasant Run and Greenfield neighborhoods);
• West — agricultural land guided for Suburban Residential;
• South — wooded open space guided for Suburban Residential;
• East — agricultural land guided for Suburban Residential.
➢ Provides adequate open space, circulation, parking, recreation, screening, and landscaping:
See Parks/Open Space/Trail; Parking; & Tree Preservation and Landscaping sections above.
➢ Encourages development which will preserve and enhance the natural terrain, rather than developing
all portions of the site to force maximum density:
See Parks/Open Space/Trail & Tree Preservation and Landscaping sections above.
172
➢ Overall compatibility of land uses and architecture to surrounding development:
As a single-family residential neighborhood Arbor Bluff will be compatible with the neighborhoods to
the north. The subject property as well as the properties to the west, south, and east are all guided
Suburban Residential and were all envisioned together as a cohesive low density residential community
through the Southern Shakopee Alternative Urban Areawide Review.
➢ Affords a greater general public benefit than would be realized through the underlying zoning district:
Arbor Bluff will offer existing Shakopee residents, as well as various demographics of prospective buyers
looking to live in Shakopee, the opportunity to purchase a new home within the City. The new residential
properties will generate tax revenue, a significant increase from the current agricultural status of the
property. Through the development of this site Wood Duck Trail and Independence Drive will be
extended creating new connections and improving circulation for the overall community. Through the
dedication of more than 13 acres of open space containing trails the general public will now have access
to the sites wooded bluff and stream features.
Schedule
Site grading will likely begin in Fall 2023 with construction of utilities and streets possibly getting underway in
Fall 2023 and continuing in 2024. Model home construction will begin in Spring 2024. The overall project will
likely be developed in three to four phases. Lennar estimates full occupancy of the community will occur
approximately 48 to 60 months from the date sales begin.
Lennar has a long-standing history of building successful communities throughout the Twin Cities, including
similar communities under development at Laketown (Victoria), Timber Creek (Carver), and The Park
(Chanhassen). We invite you to visit any of these communities and our website at https://www.lennar.com/find-
a-home?market=MIN . We are looking forward to this opportunity to work with the City of Shakopee again and
thank the City for its support.
Regards,
Josh Metzer
Land Entitlement Manager
Lennar Minnesota
173
City of Shakopee
Memorandum
TO: Mark Noble, Senior Planner
FROM: Darin Manning, Project Engineer
SUBJECT: Final Plat — Arbor Bluff Third Addition
PROJECT: PLAT -000326-2025
DATE: October 28, 2025
The staff review indicates a request to review a Final Plat application for Arbor Bluff Third
Addition Development. Arbor Bluff Third Addition is located south of Valley View Road East and
west of County Road 83 (Mystic Lake Drive).
This review should be considered preliminary, as more comments will follow with additional
submittals. However, the Engineering Department offers the following comments at this time to
the applicant and to the planning department:
The following items need to be addressed/completed prior to release of the Final Plat for
recording:
1. Plan review and plat review redlined comments are attached to this memo and must be
addressed and approved by the City Engineer.
2. Refer to Shakopee Public Utilities comments for watermain.
3. Conduct a title search to confirm other interests on the property.
4. Easements will be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They include,
but are not limited to the following:
• Verify appropriate drainage and utility easements for public sanitary sewer, storm
sewer and watermain systems are provided. The minimum widths of drainage and
utility easements are set forth in Section 10.1.A -D of the City of Shakopee Design
Criteria.
• Increase drainage and utility easement between Lot 7 and Lot 8, Block 2 to 40 -feet.
• Increase drainage and utility easement between Lot 13 and Lot 14, Block 2 to 40 -feet.
C:\Users\ufc-prod\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@4C182282\@BCL@4C182282.docx
1 of 4
174
5. Outlot A shall be deeded to the City of Shakopee.
6. Execution of a Developer's Agreement, which needs to include provisions for a letter of
credit or cash security equal to 125 percent of the estimated total cost of the
improvements, plus 100 percent of the estimated costs of city inspection and
administration.
7. Pay all applicable fees/charges listed below, as required by the most current City of
Shakopee Fee Schedule.
• Street and Utility Fee
• Watermain Fee
• Trunk Storm Water Charge
• Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge
• Sign Installation Fee
• Wetland Conservation Act Fees
• Bituminous Sealcoat Fee
• Storm Water Management Plan Review Fees
8. At a minimum, obtain final approval of the development's storm water management plan.
9. Prior to discharging into a storm water basin, pretreatment must be provided.
10. The maximum allowable sanitary sewer depth is thirty (30) feet unless approved by the
City Engineer.
11. Submit two retaining wall easements for each retaining wall as follows:
• No -Build Easement: Equal to the length of reinforcement plus 2 feet.
• Access Easement: Equal to the reinforcement length plus the distance from the lowest
reinforcement to grade multiplied by 1.5.
12. Remove proposed trees located in the "No Build Easement Area" of the retaining walls
(see comments on landscape plans) and relocate on the lots, outside of the easement
areas.
13. Submit cash deposit for the west half of Independence Drive within the dedicated right-
of-way, including associated storm sewer improvements.
14. Submit cash deposit for future trail construction through Outlot B, Arbor Bluff 2nd
Addition.
15. Submit future grading plan for Lot 12, Block 4, and Lot 1, Block 5 when Basswood Lane is
extended. Provide temporary construction easements for these lots that will expire upon
extension of the road.
16. Submit final construction plans for the Bluff Access & Bluff Top Trails.
C:\Users\ufc-prod\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@4C182282\@BCL@4C182282.docx
2 of 4
175
17. Approval of the final plat does not constitute approval of the submitted construction
plans
18. Provide electronic files (AutoCAD and Portable Document Format — PDF) of the Final Plat
to be recorded with datum on the Scott County coordinate system.
The following items need to be addressed/completed prior to approval of a grading permit, a
street and utility plan and/or a building permit:
19. Obtain a NPDES construction site permit prior to any land disturbing activity. A copy of
the permit must be provided to the city.
20. Grade the entire site, as proposed on the approved plans, in one phase within one year
from the date of approval of the grading permit application. Grading is defined as bringing
the site to the proposed finished grade with materials deemed acceptable by the City of
Shakopee engineering department, providing topsoil per City requirements and applying
seed, mulch and/or sod per City requirements and providing an as -built record grading
plan per Section 2.5 of the City of Shakopee Design Criteria.
21. Provide the city with a copy of all applicable permits/approvals, including, but not limited
to the following:
• Minnesota Department of Health
• Met Council
• Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (Sanitary Sewer Extension)
• Shakopee Public Utilities
• Any other required
22. Submit detailed pavement design calculations.
23. Submit a small utilities joint trench design and detail.
24. Submit a landscaping plan in compliance with the most recent version of the City of
Shakopee's Easement Fencing and Landscaping Policy.
25. The contractor must submit a Construction Management Plan to the city prior to any
construction activities.
26. Record plans need to be provided per the City of Shakopee Design Criteria, Section 2.5
and Section 11.2 (A -L). The record plans need to be certified and submitted to the
engineering department. Provide a letter from the engineer of record certifying all
improvements were constructed per approved plans and under the direct supervision of
the engineer of record.
C:\Users\ufc-prod\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@4C182282\@BCL@4C182282.docx
3 of 4
176
Recommendation
The Engineering Department recommends approval of the application subject to the conditions
above being addressed/completed by the applicant.
C:\Users\ufc-prod\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@4C182282\@BCL@4C182282.docx
4 of 4
177
SHAKOPEE
ENGINEERING
MEMORANDUM
TO: Darin Manning, Project Engineer, PE
FROM: Kirby Templin, Water Resources -Environmental Manager, PE
SUBJECT: Arbor Bluff 3rd Addition - Stormwater Review Comments - 1
DATE: October 30, 2025
This memo summarizes the stormwater review comments for Arbor Bluff 3rd Addition (final plat
application). The following comments must be addressed prior to the issuance of a grading and/or
building permit.
The following documents were submitted for review:
• 03-123059 - Arbor Bluff 3rd Addition Utilities - Rev 00 - (02-07-25)_v1, Dated 2/7/2025
The following documents were also reviewed but were not provided as a submittal for this review.
These files were provided for a previous addition of the development or grading phase but are
relevant in the review of Final Plat and utilities for 3rd Addition:
• 01 -123059 -Arbor Bluffs PH 1 &2-GR - Rev 07 (07-03-2024), Dated 7/3/2024
• 123059 Hauer -Shakopee Stormwater 4-16-2025, Dated 4/16/2025
General Stormwater Comments
1. Provide a comment response memo.
2. Storm sewer calculations were not provided for review, however, the storm sewer
calculations previously provided for the 2nd addition were reviewed to provide comments
for the 3rd Addition storm sewer. Provide updated calculations for the 3rd Addition and
include corresponding figure. In addition, update calculations based on the following
comments.
3. The storm sewer calculations do not show the correct storm size for STMH-227 to STMH-
226, Update the calculations to match the 2nd Addition Utility Plan.
4. The storm sewer calculations do not appear to have the correct diameter compared to the
proposed utility plans for 3rd Addition. Update the calculations to match the utility plan.
5. Upsize the storm sewer pipe for segment (CBMH-282 to STMH-281) to a 21 -inch Pipe.
6. Upsize the storm sewer pipe for segment (CBMH-231 to STMH-230) to a 24 -inch Pipe.
7. Upsize the storm sewer pipe for segment (CBMH-230 to STMH-229) to a 24 -inch Pipe.
8. Upsize the storm sewer pipe for segment (CBMH-229 to STMH-228) to a 24 -inch Pipe.
9. Upsize the storm sewer pipe for segment (CBMH-228 to STMH-227) to a 24 -inch Pipe.
INNOVATING. ENTERTAINING.THRIVING.
Department of Engineering 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee, MN 55379 I Phone: 952-233-9300 Fax: 952-233-3801 www.ShakopeeMN.gov
178
10. The storm sewer calculations do not show the correct storm size for STMH-227 to STMH-
226, Update the calculations to match the 2nd Addition Utility Plan.
11. There are some comments on the plans provided by Darin Manning to add additional
storm sewer and catch basins to the rear of several lots. Update storm sewer calculations
and figure to reflect these changes. Update the Stormwater Management Plan with the
new storm sewer calculations.
INNOVATING. ENTERTAINING.THRIVING.
Department of Engineering 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee, MN 55379 I Phone: 952-233-9300 Fax: 952-233-3801 www.ShakopeeMN.gov
179
SHAKOPE E
MEMORANDUM
TO: Darin Manning, Project Engineer, PE
FROM: Lindsey Vugteveen, Water Resources -Environmental Technician
SUBJECT: Arbor Bluff 3rd Addition — Erosion Control Review Comments - 1
DATE: October 17th, 2025
This memo summarizes the erosion control review comments for Arbor Bluff 3rd Addition.
The following documents were submitted for review:
• 03-123059 — Arbor Bluff 3rd Addition Utilities — Rev 00 — (02-07-25)_v1, Dated 2/7/2025
Erosion Control
1. Use the MNDOT Standard Erosion Control Plans for erosion control details. It appears only
the detail for inlet protection is included in this plan set. Include all necessary details.
Include one per plan sheet.
2. Include a soils map in the SWPPP.
INNOVATING. ENTERTAINING.THRIVING.
IVING.
Department of Engineering 1485 Gorman St., Shakopee, MN 55379 I Phone: 952-233-9300 Fax: 952-233-38011 www.ShakopeeMN.gov
180
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.f
November 18, 2025
Change Order for SRF for West End AUAR Five Year Update
Michael Kerski, Planning and Development Director
Michael Kerski
Action to be considered:
Approve
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
There have been a number of unforeseen delays in moving this project to completion as
outlines in the attached memo from SRF staff. The AUAR will not likely be approved until
the first meeting in January. Staff and SRF have worked with the EQB staff on an
extension of time since the original was approved in November 2020 and there is a five
year time window.
Recommendation:
Approve Change Order for SRF for the West End AUAR Update in the amount of $25,000
Budget Impact:
Paid for out of AUAR Fees paid by development at $1,000/acre
Attachments:
JacksonAUAR_SRF_Amendment_Nov2025 (002).pdf
181
SRF
SRF Project No. 19234.00
November 13, 2025
Michael Kerski
Director of Planning & Development
City of Shakopee
485 Gorman Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
Direct 952-233-9346
Cell 864-360-5473
Subject: Amendment Number 1 to Proposal for Professional Services for the Jackson Township
Development Area Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Update
Dear Michael:
The original scope of services for the Jackson Township Development Area AUAR Update dated
June 17, 2025 included an SRF fee of $80,902 to develop a required five-year update to the
original 2020 AUAR document. SRF completed this update as scoped under the original timeline,
but subsequent events have extended the project timeline and required additional work beyond
the original scope. The original scope and schedule assumed that no agencies would file an
official objection to the draft. However, during the agency review comment period, the
Metropolitan Council (Met Council) submitted an objection letter to the draft document on
October 14. The objection outlined several major concerns related to the methodology used to
prepare both the original 2020 and updated 2025 documents, requiring significant additional
effort from SRF.
This process will extend the original project timeline by approximately two (2) months beyond
the initial assumption, in addition to requiring the following additional work:
• Extended communications with Met Council and the Environmental Quality Board (EQB)
throughout the objection resolution process, including formal and informal meetings
with both parties, development of a formal "approach memo," and documentation of the
City's "good faith efforts" to address the Council's objection in a timely manner for EQB
records.
• Development of an updated "Potential Cumulative Effects" section. The original scope
had assumed no changes would be needed, but major updates were required to address
Met Council comments, particularly in relation to the Highview Park Development which
exceeded the development magnitude that was reviewed in the 2020 AUAR. In addition,
Met Council commented that the total impact on the environment may also be
influenced by past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects outside of the
www.srfconsulting.com
3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 I Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 1763.475.0010
Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
182
Michael Kerski
City of Shakopee
November 13, 2025
Page 2 of 3
study area and the AUAR update needs to show the cumulative impact of previous
actions in adjacent developments. This triggered the need for a comprehensive review of
any documentation to date for recently planned or approved projects, as well as the
development of a large list of projects within and adjacent to the study area, by any
proposer that could have the potential to affect the same environmental resources.
• Updated the traffic analysis memo and main AUAR to correct 2030 Comprehensive Plan
references and align land use and transportation data with 2040 Comprehensive Plan
assumptions. This included converting employment -based data to retail and non -trail
square footage for consistency, and additional traffic model runs may also be required
based on Metropolitan Council feedback. This also involved incorporation of additional
land use assumption details to validate the decision to not increase the magnitude of the
land use scenarios (as was encouraged by Met Council but not required).
• Updated the greenhouse gas (GHG) analysis and memo to reflect updated land use
assumptions following edits to address Met Council comments.
• Additional coordination with City staff due to extended timeline and scope
• Coordination with Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (SPUC) to develop updated
water demand estimates for the Jackson Township area. Incorporate information the
SPUC's latest wellhead protection plan, comprehensive water plan, and aquifer study,
and incorporate information into the main document.
• Created a new cover types figure using 2024 National Land Cover Database information,
the latest Scott County parcel data, and highlighting/incorporating the 30.5 -acre bluff
protection area into the document.
• Developed formal responses to every agency comment that was received, including each
Met Council objection detail, for inclusion in a new appendix of the revised AUAR update
document.
• Updated the required mitigation plan to address Met Council comments and MnDOT
comments.
• Complete an additional consultant -led quality assurance/quality control review, then
address any comments the City may have prior to submitting the revised document to
Met Council.
• Once final AUAR update is adopted, an additional EQB Monitor publication will be
required.
Due to the additional tasks completed on the project as detailed above, SRF is requesting an
amendment for an additional $25,000, for a total budget of $105,902. This amendment assumes
SRF 183
Michael Kerski
City of Shakopee
November 13, 2025
Page 3 of 3
that SRF will work to complete one additional draft of the document, and that Met Council will
remove their objection following a review of that draft in December. This will allow the City to
adopt the updated document at a December or January City Council meeting.
If Metropolitan Council does not remove their objection or provides additional major comments,
the City will then be required to coordinate with EQB to determine the appropriate next steps,
and additional effort may be required. In that case, SRF will coordinate with the City on any
additional amendments that may be required.
Acceptance/Notice to Proceed
A signed copy of this Amendment, emailed to Lydia Statz at Istatz@srfconsulting.com, will serve
as acceptance of this Amendment and SRF's notice to proceed.
We appreciate your consideration of this Amendment and look forward to continuing to work
with you on this project. Please contact us if you have any questions or need additional
information.
Sincerely,
SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
Lydia Statz
Project Manager
LS/EH
r
Erin Hunker, PE, CFM
Director
Approved: City of Shakopee
(signature)
Name
Title
Date
SRF 184
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.g
November 18, 2025
Change order for Miller Dunwoodie Architects
Michael Kerski, Planning and Development Director
Michael Kerski
Action to be considered:
Approve
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
Miller Dunwoodie has completed the drawings and is working on several final items not
in the original scope including lighting for the parking lot and design of the dumpster
location along with changes to sewer and water design because of bedrock.
Recommendation:
Approve Change Order in the amount of $20,000 for design changes requested by the
SHPO, site lighting and dumpster enclosure.
Budget Impact:
Paid for out of Park Development Funds
Attachments:
185
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.h
November 18, 2025
Approval of the October 1, 2025 City Council Minutes
Rick Parsons
Action to be considered:
Approve the October 1, 2025 City Council minutes.
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
These are minutes from the October 1, 2025, joint session between the City of Shakopee
City Council and the Scott County Board of Commissioners.
Recommendation:
Approve the October 1, 2025 City Council minutes.
Budget Impact:
N/A
Attachments:
10-01-2025 City Council Minutes.pdf
n utes. pdf
186
SHAKOPE E
Shakopee City Council Special Meeting
Joint City Council &t County Commissioners Meeting
Wednesday, October 1, 2025
6:00 PM
Scott County Government Center, 200 Fourth Avenue West
Vision: Shakopee is a place where people want to be! A distinctive river town, with a
multitude of business, cultural and recreational opportunities in a safe, welcoming, and
attractive environment for residents and visitors.
Mission: Our mission is to deliver high quality services essential to maintaining a safe
and sustainable community. We commit to doing this cost-effectively, with integrity and
transparency.
1) Call to Order
2) Roll Call
PRESENT:
Mayor Lehman, Council Member Contreras, Council Member Whiting, Council
Member DuLaney, and Council Member Lara
ABSENT:
None.
ALSO PRESENT:
None.
3) Pledge of Allegiance
4) Approval of Agenda
Item 5.d was renumbered as Item 5.a and subsequent items were renumbered
accordingly. By unanimous consent, the agenda was approved as modified.
5
General Business
5.a) Ch 17 Neighborhood Meeting Update - (item moved up)
5.b) Solid Waste - Regional and County Plan
5.c) Co -Responder Program - Update on the Program and Moving forward
5.d) Housing/Homeless - Update - County to provide a quick update on
programs/construction
5.e) Sales and Use Tax Plan Update
5.f) Ren Fest - Traffic Update
5.g) LETG Update - for CAD/Mobile
5.h) Public's Expectation Working Together
5.i) Round Robin
6 Adjournment
Council Member Whiting made a motion to adjourn, second by Council
Member Lara and the motion passed. 5 - 0
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.i
November 18, 2025
Approval of the November 5, 2025 City Council Minutes
Rick Parsons
Action to be considered:
Approve the November 5, 2025 City Council minutes.
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
N/A
Recommendation:
Approve the November 5, 2025 City Council minutes.
Budget Impact:
N/A
Attachments:
11-05-2025 City Council Minutes.pdf
n utes. pdf
189
SHAKOPEE
City Council
City Hall
485 Gorman Street
Shakopee, MN, 55379
Wednesday, November 5, 2025
7:00 p.m.
Vision: Shakopee is a place where people want to be! A distinctive river town, with a
multitude of business, cultural and recreational opportunities in a safe, welcoming, and
attractive environment for residents and visitors.
Mission: Our mission is to deliver high quality services essential to maintaining a safe
and sustainable community. We commit to doing this cost-effectively, with integrity and
transparency.
1) Call to Order
2) Roll Call
PRESENT:
Council Member Contreras, Council Member Whiting, and Council Member
DuLaney
ABSENT:
Mayor Lehman, and Council Member Lara
ALSO PRESENT:
None.
3) Pledge of Allegiance
4) Special Presentations
4.a) Recognition of Show Off Shakopee Winners - (postponed)
5) Approval of Agenda
Council Member Whiting made a motion to approve the agenda, second by
Council Member DuLaney and the motion passed. 3 - 0
6
)
Consent Agenda
6.a) Operating Budget and Financial Reporting Policies
6.b) Surplus Property
6.c) Employee Handbook Updates Ec Changes 2025
6.d) 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - (pulled for separate
consideration)
6.e) Monthly Financial Report - September 2025
6.f) Issue a Negative Declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact
Statement for the Minnesota Riverbank Stabilization Project
6.g) Approval of the October 21, 2025 City Council Minutes
6.h) Walmart Foundation's Spark Good Local Grants Program Application
and Award
6.i) Approval of 2026 NEOGOV Contract Renewal
Council Member Whiting made a motion to approve the consent agenda with
the modification of pulling item 6.d for separate consideration, second by
Council Member DuLaney and the motion passed. 3 - 0
7) Public Comment
8) Business removed from consent agenda
6.d) 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).
9
)
Council Member Whiting made a motion to approve the 2026-2030
Capital Improvement Plan, second by Council Member Contreras and
the motion passed. 2 - 1
Nays: Council Member DuLaney
Public Hearings
9.a) Public hearing for the issuance of revenue obligations for the benefit
of St. Francis Regional Medical Center (conduit debt).
Council Member Whiting made a motion to open public hearing,
second by Council Member DuLaney and the motion passed. 3 - 0
Council Member Whiting made a motion to close public hearing,
second by Council Member DuLaney and the motion passed. 3 - 0
Council Member DuLaney made a motion to approve Resolution R2025-
125, authorizing the issuance of revenue bonds of the City of Shakopee
191
for the benefit of St. Francis Regional Medical Center and authorizing
the execution and delivery of documents in connection therewith,
second by Council Member Whiting and the motion passed. 3 - 0
10) Recess for Economic Development Authority Meeting
Council Member DuLaney made a motion to recess for the Economic
Development Authority Meeting, second by Council Member Contreras. The
motion was passed by unanimous consent.
11) Reconvene
12) Reports
12.a) City Bill List
12.b) News and Announcements
13) Other Business
14) Adjourn to November 18, 2025, at 7:00 pm
Council Member DuLaney made a motion to adjourn to November 18, 2025, at
7:00 pm, second by Council Member Whiting and the motion passed. 3 - 0
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.j
November 18, 2025
Preliminary approval to the issuance of revenue bonds for the benefit
of Reuter Walton Development, LLC (conduit debt) and application for
LI HTC.
Nate Reinhardt, Finance Director
Action to be considered:
Adopt resolutions R2025-129 and R2025-130 which will allow Reuter Walton
Development, LLC to apply for low-income housing credits. The project is contingent
upon receiving the allocation of tax credits in January 2026. If successful, a public hearing
on the issuance of revenue bonds for the benefit of Reuter Walton Development, LLC
(conduit debt) will be scheduled in 2026.
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
Reuter Walton has been exploring sites through out the city that could be possible
development sites for a workforce housing development that would include one, two and
three bedroom units.
The site that they are proposing, 1480 3rd Avenue West, is currently zoned B-1 and also
matches the 2040 Comprehensive Plan that allows up to 30 dwelling units per acre.
Reuter Walton has completed more than 40 multifamily developments in the region.
They recently received approvals for a workforce housing development in Burnsville, and
completed The Bridgewell, 65 units in Cambridge and the LICA, 60 units in Little Canada.
Rents for the Shakopee project are based on income and are estimated to be $1,490 for a
one -bedroom, $1,788 for a two -bedroom and $2,065 for a three -bedroom.
The project was presented to City Council on October 21, 2025. The developer is now
seeking City Council preliminary approval, which will allow them to move forward with an
application for low-income housing tax credits.
Recommendation:
193
Two separate resolutions.
Adopt Resolution No. R2025-129 providing preliminary approval to the issuance of
revenue bonds under Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 462C and 474A, as amended, for the
benefit of Reuter Walton Development, LLC, or an affiliate, successor, or assign, and
taking other actions in connection therewith.
Adopt Resolution No. R2025-130 approving the form and execution of a QCT preservation
letter for a multifamily housing project to be undertaken by Reuter Walton Development,
LLC, or an affiliate, successor, or assign.
Budget Impact:
The borrow agrees to pay out-of-pocket expenses of the City with respect to this
transaction as well as the City's administrative fee. The city will also receive building
permit revenue and park development funds from the project.
Attachments:
Shakopee Reuter Walton Preliminary Resolution R2025-129.doc
Shakopee Reuter Walton Resolution R2025-130 Approving QCT Preservation Desigantion
Letter.docx
Shakopee Reuter Walton QCT Preservation Letter.docx
194
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
RESOLUTION NO. R2025-129
RESOLUTION PROVIDING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ISSUANCE OF
REVENUE BONDS UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTERS 462C AND
474A, AS AMENDED, FOR THE BENEFIT OF REUTER WALTON
DEVELOPMENT, LLC, OR AN AFFILIATE, SUCCESSOR, OR ASSIGN, AND
TAKING OTHER ACTIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the "City") is a statutory city and political
subdivision duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Housing Act"), the
City is authorized to carry out the public purposes described in the Housing Act by providing for the
issuance of revenue bonds or other obligations to provide funds to finance multifamily housing
developments; and
WHEREAS, Reuter Walton Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, or an
affiliate, successor, or assign (collectively, the "Borrower"), has proposed to finance the acquisition,
construction and equipping of an approximately 175 -unit multifamily housing development for
occupancy by persons of low and moderate income and facilities functionally related and subordinate
thereto to be located at or about 1480 Third Avenue West in the City (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Borrower is requesting that the City issue one or more series of tax-exempt or
taxable conduit revenue bonds or other obligations (the "Bonds"), in the approximate maximum principal
amount of $34,500,000 in order to finance all or a portion of (i) the costs of the acquisition, construction,
and equipping of the Project; (ii) required reserve funds, if any; (iii) capitalized interest during the
construction of the Project, if necessary; and (iv) the costs of issuing the Bonds; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 146 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
"Code"), any Bonds issued on a tax-exempt basis (the "Tax -Exempt Bonds") must receive an allocation
of bonding authority of the State of Minnesota, and an application for such an allocation must be made
pursuant to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474A, as amended (the "Allocation Act"),
and the City Council must grant preliminary approval to the issuance of the Bonds to finance the Project
and authorize the submission of an application to the office of Minnesota Management and Budget for an
allocation of bonding authority with respect to the Tax -Exempt Bonds to finance the Project; and
WHEREAS, as a condition to the issuance of the Bonds, the City must prepare and adopt a
housing program providing the information required by Section 462C.03, subdivision la of the Housing
Act (the "Housing Program"); and
WHEREAS, under Section 147(f) of the Code, prior to the issuance of the Bonds, the City
Council must conduct a public hearing after providing notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the
City at least seven (7) days before the hearing, and under Section 462C.04, subdivision 2 of the Housing
Act, a public hearing must be held on the Housing Program after one publication of notice in a newspaper
circulating generally in the City at least ten (10) days before the hearing; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS
FOLLOWS:
4926-8013-5544.1
195
Section 1. Preliminary Findings. Based on representations made by the Borrower to the
City to date, the City Council hereby makes the following preliminary findings, determinations, and
declarations:
(a) The Bonds will finance a multifamily housing development designed and
intended to be used for rental occupancy.
(b) The proceeds of the Bonds will be loaned to the Borrower and the proceeds
thereof, along with other available funds, will be used to finance all or a portion of the costs of
the acquisition, construction, and equipping of the Project, capitalized interest during the
construction of the Project, if necessary, any required reserve funds, and the costs of issuance of
the Bonds. The City will enter into a loan agreement (or other revenue agreement) with the
Borrower requiring loan repayments from the Borrower in amounts sufficient to repay the loan of
the proceeds of the Bonds when due and requiring the Borrower to pay all costs of maintaining
and insuring the Project, including taxes thereon.
(c) In preliminarily authorizing the issuance of the Bonds, the City's purpose is and
the effect thereof will be to promote the public welfare of the City and its residents by retaining
and improving multifamily housing developments and otherwise furthering the purposes and
policies of the Housing Act.
(d) The Bonds will be special, limited obligations of the City payable solely from the
revenues pledged to the payment thereof, will not be a general or moral obligation of the City,
and will not be secured by or payable from revenues derived from any exercise of the taxing
powers of the City.
Section 2. Submission of an Application for an Allocation of Bonding Authority. The City
Council hereby authorizes the submission of an application for allocation of bonding authority with
respect to the Bonds in the approximate principal amount of up to $34,500,000 pursuant to Section 146 of
the Code and the Allocation Act in accordance with the requirements of the Allocation Act. City staff
and Kutak Rock LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, as bond counsel to the City ("Bond Counsel"), shall take
all actions, in cooperation with the Borrower, as are necessary to submit an application for an allocation
of bonding authority to the office of Minnesota Management and Budget.
Section 3. Public Hearing. The City Council shall meet at a date to be determined by City
staff to conduct a public hearing on the Housing Program, the Project, and the issuance of the Bonds by
the City. Notice of such hearing (the "Public Notice") will be published as required by Section 462C.04,
subdivision 2 of the Housing Act and Section 147(f) of the Code. Bond Counsel is hereby authorized and
directed to publish the Public Notice, in substantially the form attached hereto as EXHIBIT A, in the
official newspaper of and a newspaper of general circulation in the City, at least ten (10) days prior to the
meeting of the City Council at which the public hearing will take place. At the public hearing reasonable
opportunity will be provided for interested individuals to express their views, both orally and in writing,
on the Project, the Housing Program, and the proposed issuance of the Bonds.
Section 4. Housing Program. Bond Counsel shall prepare the Housing Program for the
Project on behalf of the City. Bond Counsel is authorized and directed to submit, on behalf of the City,
the Housing Program to Metropolitan Council for review and comment pursuant to Section 462C.04,
subdivision 2 of the Housing Act.
4926-8013-5544.1 2
196
Section 5. Preliminary Approval. The City Council hereby provides preliminary approval
to the issuance of the Bonds, subject to: (i) a public hearing as required by the Housing Act and
Section 147(f) of the Code; (ii) final approval following the preparation of bond documents; (iii) receipt
of an allocation of bonding authority from the office of Minnesota Management and Budget; and (iv) final
determination by the City Council that the financing of the Project and the issuance of the Bonds are in
the best interests of the City.
Section 6. Reimbursement of Costs under the Code.
6.01. The United States Department of the Treasury has promulgated regulations governing the
use of the proceeds of tax-exempt bonds, all or a portion of which are to be used to reimburse the City or
the Borrower for project expenditures paid prior to the date of issuance of such bonds. Those regulations
(Treasury Regulations, Section 1.150-2) (the "Regulations") require that the City adopt a statement of
official intent to reimburse an original expenditure not later than sixty (60) days after payment of the
original expenditure. The Regulations also generally require that the bonds be issued and the
reimbursement allocation made from the proceeds of the bonds occur within eighteen (18) months after
the later of: (i) the date the expenditure is paid; or (ii) the date the project is placed in service or
abandoned, but in no event more than three (3) years after the date the expenditure is paid. The
Regulations generally permit reimbursement of capital expenditures and costs of issuance of the Bonds.
6.02. To the extent any portion of the proceeds of the Bonds will be applied to expenditures
with respect to the Project, the City reasonably expects to reimburse the Borrower for the expenditures
made for costs of the Project from the proceeds of the Bonds after the date of payment of all or a portion
of such expenditures. All reimbursed expenditures shall be capital expenditures, costs of issuance of the
Bonds, or other expenditures eligible for reimbursement under Section 1.150-2(d)(3) of the Regulations
and also qualifying expenditures under the Housing Act.
Based on representations by the Borrower, other than (i) expenditures to be paid or reimbursed
from sources other than the Bonds, (ii) expenditures permitted to be reimbursed under prior regulations
pursuant to the transitional provision contained in Section 1.150-2(j)(2)(i)(B) of the Regulations,
(iii) expenditures constituting preliminary expenditures within the meaning of Section 1.150-2(x(2) of the
Regulations, or (iv) expenditures in a "de minimis" amount (as defined in Section 1.150-2(fl(1) of the
Regulations), no expenditures with respect to the Project to be reimbursed with the proceeds of the Bonds
have been made by the Borrower more than sixty (60) days before the date of adoption of this resolution
of the City.
6.03. Based on representations by the Borrower, as of the date hereof, there are no funds of the
Borrower reserved, allocated on a long-term basis or otherwise set aside (or reasonably expected to be
reserved, allocated on a long-term basis or otherwise set aside) to provide permanent financing for the
expenditures related to the Project to be financed from proceeds of the Bonds, other than pursuant to the
issuance of the Bonds. This resolution, therefore, is determined to be consistent with the budgetary and
financial circumstances of the Borrower as they exist or are reasonably foreseeable on the date hereof.
Section 7. Costs. The Borrower will pay the administrative fees of the City and pay, or,
upon demand, reimburse the City for payment of, any and all costs incurred by the City in connection
with the Project and the issuance of the Bonds, whether or not the Bonds are issued.
Section 8. Commitment Conditional. The adoption of this resolution does not constitute a
guaranty or firm commitment that the City will issue the Bonds as requested by the Borrower. The City
retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not to issue the
Bonds, or issue the Bonds in an amount less than the amount referred to herein, should the City at any
4926-8013-5544.1 3
197
time prior to issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the Bonds, or
to issue the Bonds in an amount less than the amount referred to herein, or should the parties to the
transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required
for the transaction.
Section 9. Effective Date. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage.
Approved by the City Council of the City of Shakopee this 18th day of November, 2025.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
4926-8013-5544.1 4
198
EXHIBIT A
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE APPROVAL OF A HOUSING
PROGRAM FOR A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND THE
ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES,
CHAPTERS 462C AND 474A, AS AMENDED, FOR THE BENEFIT OF REUTER
WALTON DEVELOPMENT, LLC, OR AN AFFILIATE, SUCCESSOR, OR
ASSIGN
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the
"City") will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, , 2026, at or after 7:00 p.m. in Council
Chambers at City Hall, located at 485 Gorman Street in the City, to consider a proposal that the City
approve and authorize the issuance of one or more series of tax-exempt or taxable revenue bonds or other
obligations (the "Bonds") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 462C and 474A, as amended (the
"Act"), for the purposes of financing all or a portion of the costs of (i) the acquisition, construction, and
equipping of an approximately 175 -unit multifamily housing development for occupancy by persons of
low and moderate income and facilities functionally related and subordinate thereto to be located at or
about 1480 Third Avenue West in the City (the "Project"); (ii) any required reserve funds; (iii) capitalized
interest during the construction of the Project, if necessary; and (iv) the costs of issuing the Bonds.
Reuter Walton Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, or an affiliate, successor, or
assign (collectively, the "Borrower"), will own the Project. The aggregate principal amount of the
proposed Bonds is estimated not to exceed $34,500,000.
Following the public hearing, the City Council will consider a resolution approving a housing
program prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Act and granting approval to the issuance of
the Bonds.
The Bonds if and when issued will be special, limited obligations of the City, and the Bonds and
interest thereon will be payable solely from the revenues and assets pledged to the payment thereof. No
holder of any Bond will have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the
Bonds or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment against any property of the City except money
payable by the Borrower to the City and pledged to the payment of the Bonds. Before issuing the Bonds,
the City will enter into an agreement with the Borrower, whereby the Borrower will be obligated to make
payments at least sufficient at all times to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds when due.
At the time and place fixed for the public hearing, the City Council will give all persons who
appear at the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. In addition,
interested persons may direct any questions or file written comments respecting the proposal with the City
Administrator, at or prior to said public hearing.
Dated: [Date of Publication]
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
/s/ William H. Reynolds
A-1
4926-8013-5544.1
199
City Administrator
City of Shakopee, Minnesota
A-2
4926-8013-5544.1
200
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
RESOLUTION NO. R2025-130
APPROVING THE FORM AND EXECUTION OF A QCT PRESERVATION LETTER
FOR A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROJECT TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY REUTER
WALTON DEVELOPMENT, LLC, OR AN AFFILIATE, SUCCESSOR, OR ASSIGN
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the "City") is a statutory city and political
subdivision duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Housing Act"), the
City is authorized to carry out the public purposes described in the Housing Act by providing for the
issuance of revenue bonds or other obligations to finance multifamily housing developments located within
the City; and
WHEREAS, Reuter Walton Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, or an
affiliate, successor, or assign (collectively, the "Borrower"), has proposed that the City, pursuant to the
Housing Act, issue its revenue bonds or other obligations (the "Bonds"), the proceeds of which will be
loaned by the City to the Borrower, and the Borrower will apply the proceeds of such loan to finance the
acquisition, construction and equipping of a multifamily rental housing development and facilities
functionally related and subordinate thereto to be located in the City (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Borrower has represented to the City that the Project is expected to qualify for
low-income housing credits ("LIHTC") under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the "Code"), based on the proposed issuance of the Bonds by the City and the loan of the proceeds thereof
to the Borrower, and the Borrower's use of such proceeds to acquire and construct the Project; and
WHEREAS, for purposes of calculating the LIHTC, in the case of buildings located in areas
designated as Qualified Census Tracts ("QCTs"), eligible basis may be increased up to thirty percent (30%)
from what it would otherwise be; and
WHEREAS, the Borrower has further represented to the City that the Project is located in an area
that is designated as a QCT in 2025 for purposes of the LIHTC under Section 42 of the Code, but will not
be designated a QCT in 2026; and
WHEREAS, as provided in a notice of the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development published at 89 Federal Register 73113 (Sept. 9, 2024) (the "HUD Notice"), the QCT
designation may be preserved for seven hundred thirty (730) days (two (2) years) if the Borrower submits
a complete bond application to the City, and a complete bond application means that no more than de
minimis clarification of the application is required for the City to make a decision about the issuance of
bonds requested in the application; and
WHEREAS, the Borrower submitted, and the City received, a bond application dated November
10, 2025 (the "Bond Application"), for the Project and the issuance of the Bonds by the City to finance the
acquisition and construction of the Project, and the Borrower has requested that the City execute and deliver
a letter, the form of which is on file with the City, for purposes of having the area in which the Project will
be constructed, continue to be treated as a QCT from and after January 1, 2026 under Section 42 of the
Code in accordance with the HUD Notice (the "QCT Preservation Letter"); and
4931-0710-0010.1
201
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS
FOLLOWS:
1. Based on representations made by the Borrower to the City to date, the City Council hereby
makes the following preliminary findings, determinations, and declarations:
(a) The City has received and reviewed the Bond Application and has determined that no more
than de minimis clarifications to the Bond Application (if any) would be required for the City to make a
final decision to issue the Bonds that are requested in the Bond Application, and, as such, the Bond
Application is complete for purposes of Section 42 of the Code.
(b) The City Council hereby authorizes the execution and delivery of the QCT Preservation
Letter by the City Administrator of the City, or his designee, in substantially the form now on file with the
City which is hereby approved, with such necessary and appropriate variations, omissions, and insertions
as are approved by Kutak Rock LLP, bond counsel to the City ("Bond Counsel"), as do not materially
adversely change the substance thereof with respect to the City, and as the City Administrator, in his
discretion, shall determine, and the execution thereof by the City Administrator shall be conclusive
evidence of such determination.
2. The adoption of this resolution does not constitute a guaranty or firm commitment that the
City will issue the Bonds as requested by the Borrower in the Bond Application. If, as a result of
information made available to or obtained by the City during its review of the Project, it appears that the
Project or the issuance of the Bonds to finance the costs thereof is not in the public interest or is inconsistent
with the purposes of the Housing Act, the City reserves the right to decline to give preliminary and final
approval to the issuance of the Bonds. The City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from
participation and accordingly not to issue the Bonds should the City at any time prior to issuance thereof
determine that it is in the best interests of the City not to issue the Bonds or should the parties to the
transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required
for this bond financing transaction.
3. The Borrower shall pay to the City any and all costs incurred by the City in connection
with the QCT Preservation Letter, the Bonds or the financing of the Project, whether or not the financing
of the Project is carried to completion, and whether or not the Bonds, if approved by the City, or operative
instruments are executed and delivered.
4. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage.
Approved by the City Council of the City of Shakopee this 18th day of November, 2025.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
2
4931-0710-0010.1
202
[LETTERHEAD OF CITY OF SHAKOPEE]
November 18, 2025
Reuter Walton Development, LLC
4450 Excelsior Boulevard, Suite 400
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Re: Preservation of QCT Status
To whom it may concern:
We have received your application for conduit bond project financing (the "Bond Application") for
a new construction project to be undertaken by Reuter Walton Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited
liability company, or an affiliate, successor, or assign (collectively, the "Borrower"), comprised of an
approximately 175 -unit multifamily rental housing development and facilities functionally related and
subordinate thereto to be located at or about 1480 Third Avenue West in the City of Shakopee, Minnesota
(the "Project"), which you intend to finance through the issuance of tax-exempt bonds (the "Bonds") by the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the "Issuer") in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $34,500,000.
As outlined in the Bond Application, and in conversations between you and staff of the Issuer, the Project
is expected to qualify for low-income housing credits ("LIHTC") under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), based on the proposed issuance of the Bonds by the Issuer and the
loan of the proceeds thereof to the Borrower, and the Borrower's use of such proceeds to acquire and
construct the Project.
Based on representations from you, the Issuer understands that (1) the Project is located in an area
that is designated as a Qualified Census Tract ("QCT") in 2025 for purposes of the LIHTC under Section 42
of the Code, but will not be designated a QCT in 2026, and (2) the Borrower has requested this confirmation
letter from the Issuer for purposes of having the area in which the Project will be constructed, continue to
be treated as a QCT from and after January 1, 2026 for purposes of Section 42 of the Code in accordance
with the notice of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development published at 89 Federal
Register 73113 (Sept. 9, 2024) (the "HUD Notice").
This letter confirms that we have received and reviewed the Bond Application and have determined
that no more than de minimis clarifications to the Bond Application (if any) were required for us to make a
final decision to issue the Bonds that are requested in the Bond Application, and, as such, the Bond
Application is complete. You have represented to the Issuer, and the Issuer hereby acknowledges, that prior
to the actual issuance of Bonds with respect to the Project, changes may occur as to information that is
included in the Bond Application.
This letter does not obligate the Issuer to issue bonds, nor does it serve as a grant of your application
to the Issuer as described herein or any other application to the Issuer with respect to the Project. This
letter's sole purpose is to confirm that we have reviewed the Bond Application and determined that the
Bond Application is complete within the meaning of the HUD Notice.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
By:
Name:
Title:
4915-4865-3930.1
203
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.k
November 18, 2025
Resolution approving documents in connection with the issuance of
revenue bonds of the City of Shakopee for the benefit of St. Francis
Regional Medical Canter and ratifying Resolution No. R2025-125
Nate Reinhardt, Finance Director
Action to be considered:
Adopt Resolution R2025-131
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
Following a public hearing on November 5, 2026 the City Council approved a Resolution
R2025-125. The resolution approved by City Council was based on bond documents
circulated prior to that meeting.
Since that City Council meeting it was determined by the working group that they wanted
to modify their approach to the bond sale using multi -model bonds, which allow various
options on how to purchase the bonds. The attorney for St. Francis Regional Medical
Center and the City's bond council have drafted a revised resolution and is seeking City
Council approval, which will allow this change to the language of the Bond Indenture and
Loan Agreement documents.
There are no changes to the proposed amount or uses of bond proceeds.
The conduit bonds will not constitute a general or moral obligation of the City and will not
be secured by or payable from any property or assets of the City and will not be secured
by any taking power of the City. The bonds will not be subject to any debt limitation
imposed on the City, and the issuance of the bonds will not have any adverse impact on
the credit rating of the City, even in the event the borrow defaults.
Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution No. R2025-131
Budget Impact:
204
There is no financial obligation (liability) or financial impact to the City of Shakopee, the
refunding bonds will be conduit debt of the City of Shakopee. Any costs associated with
the refinancing, including City legal fees, will be the responsibility of St. Francis Regional
Medical Center. The City will receive a fee as part of this transaction.
Attachments:
Shakopee SFRMC 2025 Document Approval Resolution R2025-131.doc
Resolution R2025-125 Authorizing the Issuance of Revenue Bonds - St. Francis.pdf
Shakopee SFRMC 2025 Ltr N Reinhardt re Bond Resolution.docx
205
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R2025-131
RESOLUTION APPROVING DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE
ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE FOR THE
BENEFIT OF ST. FRANCIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AND RATIFYING
RESOLUTION NO. R2025-125
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the "City") is a statutory city and political
subdivision duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.1655, as
amended (the "Act"), to issue revenue bonds for the following purposes: (i) to finance, in whole or in
part, the cost of the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement, betterment or extension of a
project, defined in the Act as any properties, real or personal, used or useful in connection with a revenue
producing enterprise, whether or not operated for profit, engaged in providing health care services,
including, without limitation, hospitals and related medical facilities; and (ii) to refund, in whole or in
part, bonds previously issued by the City under the authority of the Act; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting on November 5, 2025, following a duly noticed public hearing, the
City Council of the City approved Resolution R2025-125 (the "Bond Resolution"), which authorized the
issuance by the City of one or more series of tax-exempt or taxable revenue obligations (the "Bonds") in
the estimated aggregate principal amount not to exceed $70,000,000, for the benefit of St. Francis
Regional Medical Center, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the "Corporation"), to (i) refund the
outstanding Health Care Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (St. Francis Regional Medical Center),
Series 2014 (the "Prior Bonds"), issued by the City in the original aggregate principal amount of
$41,865,000, the proceeds of which financed or refinanced capital improvements to the acute care
hospital facilities of the Corporation located at 1455 St. Francis Avenue in the City, and the construction
and equipping of a new inpatient bed tower, the expansion, improvement, and/or equipping of the
Corporation's emergency department facilities, surgery department facilities, cancer center, diagnostic
and cardiopulmonary services, lab and pharmacy areas, support areas, including plant services and
administrative areas, and other improvements to the Corporation's acute care hospital facilities
(collectively, the "Prior Project"); (ii) finance the capital costs of the Corporation's Phase 2+ emergency
department expansion and renovation to include additional rooms, triage rooms, isolation rooms,
equipment storage and support space and the relocation and expansion of the ambulance garage, as well
as other improvements to the Corporation's acute care hospital facilities, including but not limited to
diagnostics equipment replacement, facilities replacements including roof top units, and a transfer switch
upgrade (collectively, the "New Project"); (iii) finance capitalized interest during the construction of the
New Project; (iv) fund required reserves, if any; and (v) pay costs of issuance of the Bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Corporation will own and operate the Prior Project and the New Project and has
represented to the City that it is exempt from federal income taxation under Section 501(a) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), as a result of the application of Section 501(c)(3) of the
Code; and
WHEREAS, DNT Asset Trust, a Delaware business trust and a wholly owned subsidiary of
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, has agreed to purchase the Bonds in accordance with the
terms of the Continuing Covenant Agreement between the Purchaser and the Corporation; and
4923-9632-0113.1
206
WHEREAS, in addition to approving the issuance of the Bonds, the Bond Resolution approved
the execution and delivery by officials of the City of a Bond Trust Indenture (the "Bond Indenture")
between the City and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., a national banking association, in its capacity
as bond trustee, and a Loan Agreement (the "Loan Agreement") between the City and the Corporation, in
substantially the forms on file with the City Council at its meeting; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the approval of the execution and delivery, the parties to the financing
determined the need to substantively revise the forms of the Bond Indenture and the Loan Agreement; and
WHEREAS, there have been presented to the City Council new forms of the Bond Indenture and
the Loan Agreement; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council hereby approves the forms of the Bond Indenture and the Loan
Agreement in substantially the forms on file with the City, and authorizes and directs the Mayor and the
City Administrator to execute and deliver the Bond Indenture and the Loan Agreement in substantially
the forms on file, with such omissions and insertions as do not materially change the substance thereof, or
as the Mayor and the City Administrator, in their discretion, shall determine, and the execution thereof by
the Mayor and the City Administrator shall be conclusive evidence of such determination.
2. The City Council hereby ratifies its approvals, findings, and determinations provided in
the Bond Resolution. The Bond Resolution shall remain in full force and effect.
3. The officers of the City, Kutak Rock LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, as bond counsel to
the City, other attorneys, and other agents or employees of the City are hereby authorized to do all acts
and things required of them by or in connection with this resolution, the aforementioned documents, and
the Bonds for the full, punctual and complete performance of all the terms, covenants and agreements
contained in the Bonds, the aforementioned documents and this resolution. In the event that for any
reason the Mayor is unable to carry out the execution of any of the documents or other acts provided
herein, any persons delegated the duties of the Mayor shall be authorized to act in the capacity of the
Mayor and undertake such execution or acts on behalf of the City with full force and effect, which
execution or acts shall be valid and binding on the City. If for any reason the City Administrator is
unable to execute and deliver the documents referred to in this resolution, such documents may be
executed by any person delegated the duties of the City Administrator, with the same force and effect as if
such documents were executed and delivered by the City Administrator.
4. The City understands that the Corporation will pay the City's administrative fee upon
issuance of the Bonds. In addition, the Corporation will pay all costs paid or incurred by the City in
connection with the transactions authorized by this resolution, whether or not the Bonds are issued.
5. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage.
4923-9632-0113.1 2
207
Approved by the City Council of the City of Shakopee this 18th day of November, 2025.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
4923-9632-0113.1 3
208
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R2025-125
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE FOR THE BENEFIT OF ST. FRANCIS REGIONAL MEDICAL
CENTER AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF
DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the "City") is a statutory city and political
subdivision duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.1655, as
amended (the "Act"), to issue revenue bonds for the following purposes: (i) to finance, in whole or in
part, the cost of the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement, betterment or extension of a
project, defined in the Act as any properties, real or personal, used or useful in connection with a revenue
producing enterprise, whether or not operated for profit, engaged in providing health care services,
including, without limitation, hospitals and related medical facilities; and (ii) to refund, in whole or in
part, bonds previously issued by the City under the authority of the Act; and
WHEREAS, St. Francis Regional Medical Center, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the
"Corporation"), has proposed that the City issue its one or more series of taxable or tax-exempt revenue
obligations (the "Bonds") in the estimated aggregate principal amount not to exceed $70,000,000 and loan
the proceeds thereof to the Corporation to (i) refund the outstanding Health Care Facilities Revenue
Refunding Bonds (St. Francis Regional Medical Center), Series 2014 (the "Prior Bonds"), issued by the
City in the original aggregate principal amount of $41,865,000, the proceeds of which financed or
refinanced capital improvements to the acute care hospital facilities of the Corporation located at 1455 St.
Francis Avenue in the City, and the construction and equipping of a new inpatient bed tower, the
expansion, improvement, and/or equipping of the Corporation's emergency department facilities, surgery
department facilities, cancer center, diagnostic and cardiopulmonary services, lab and pharmacy areas,
support areas, including plant services and administrative areas, and other improvements to the
Corporation's acute care hospital facilities (collectively, the "Prior Project"); (ii) finance the capital costs
of the Corporation's Phase 2+ emergency department expansion and renovation to include additional
rooms, triage rooms, isolation rooms, equipment storage and support space and the relocation and
expansion of the ambulance garage, as well as other improvements to the Corporation's acute care
hospital facilities, including but not limited to diagnostics equipment replacement, facilities replacements
including roof top units, and a transfer switch upgrade (collectively, the "New Project"); (iii) finance
capitalized interest during the construction of the New Project; (iv) fund required reserves, if any; and
(v) pay costs of issuance of the Bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Corporation will own and operate the Prior Project and the New Project
(together, the "Project") and has represented to the City that it is exempt from federal income taxation
under Section 501(a) of the Code as a result of the application of Section 501(c)(3) of the Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 469.154 of the Act, prior to the issuance of the Bonds by the
City, the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development
("DEED") must approve the costs of the New Project to be funded by the Bonds on the basis of an
application submitted by the City with all required attachments and exhibits (the "DEED Application");
and
4923-9632-0113.1
209
WHEREAS, pursuant to the regulations promulgated under Section 147(f) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), prior to the issuance of the Bonds, the City Council
must conduct a public hearing after a publication of a notice of public hearing in a newspaper of general
circulation in the City at least seven (7) days before the hearing, and pursuant to Section 469.154,
subdivision 4 of the Act, a public hearing must be held after a publication of a notice of public hearing in
the official newspaper of and a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least ten (10) days before
the hearing; and
WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing (the "Public Notice") was published in the New Prague
Times, the official newspaper of and a newspaper of general circulation in the City, with respect to the
public hearing to be held pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code and the regulations promulgated
thereunder and Section 469.154, subdivision 4 of the Act, on a date at least ten (10) days prior to the
regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City, and on the date hereof the City Council
conducted a public hearing at which a reasonable opportunity was provided for interested individuals to
express their views, both orally and in writing; and
WHEREAS, the Bonds are to be issued under the Act and a Bond Indenture of Trust (the "Bond
Indenture") between the City and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., a national banking association, in
its capacity as bond trustee (the "Bond Trustee"), and the proceeds derived from the sale of the Bonds are
to be loaned to the Corporation under a Loan Agreement (the "Loan Agreement") between the City and
the Corporation; and
WHEREAS, DNT Asset Trust, a Delaware business trust and a wholly owned subsidiary of
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (the "Purchaser"), has agreed to purchase the Bonds in
accordance with the terms of the Continuing Covenant Agreement between the Purchaser and the
Corporation; and
WHEREAS, in consideration of the loan by the City of the proceeds of the Bonds to the
Corporation and to secure the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds
when due, the Corporation, as the representative of the Obligated Group (the "Obligated Group
Representative") currently consisting of the Corporation (the "Obligated Group") under the Master Trust
Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2004, as heretofore supplemented (the "Master Indenture"), between the
Obligated Group Representative and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., a national banking association
and successor -in -interest to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, in its capacity as master trustee (the
"Master Trustee"), will issue a supplemental note (the "Series 2025 Obligation") to the City under a
supplemental master trust indenture (the "Supplemental Indenture") between the Obligated Group
Representative and the Master Trustee, which supplements the Master Indenture; and
WHEREAS, the Series 2025 Obligation will be in the same aggregate principal amount and bear
interest at the same rate or rates as the Bonds, will have redemption provisions corresponding to those of
the Bonds, and will be payable in installments equal to the maturities and mandatory redemption of the
Bonds; and
WHEREAS, the loan repayments required to be made by the Corporation under the terms of the
Loan Agreement will be assigned to the Bond Trustee under the terms of the Bond Indenture, and the
Series 2025 Obligation will be assigned by the City to the Bond Trustee under the terms of the Bond
Indenture and the Supplemental Indenture; and
WHEREAS, the Bonds and the interest and any premium on the Bonds: (i) shall be payable
solely from the revenues pledged therefor; (ii) shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of
4923-9632-0113.1 2
210
any constitutional or statutory limitation; (iii) shall not constitute nor give rise to a pecuniary liability of
the City or a charge against its general credit or taxing powers; and (iv) shall not constitute a charge, lien,
or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City other than the City's interest in the
Loan Agreement, the Series 2025 Obligation, and the Project; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City acknowledges, finds, determines, and declares that: (i) the issuance of the
Bonds is authorized by the Act; and (ii) the application of the proceeds of the Bonds to redeem and
prepay all or any portion of the Prior Bonds, finance the New Project, finance capitalized interest during
the construction of the New Project, if necessary, fund any required reserves, and pay all or a portion of
the costs of issuance of the Bonds is consistent with and furthers the purposes of the Act.
2. For the purposes set forth above, there is hereby authorized the issuance, sale and
delivery of the Bonds in one or more series in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $70,000,000,
subject to the approval of the costs of the New Project by DEED on the basis of information provided in
the DEED Application. The Bonds shall bear interest at fixed or variable rates and shall be designated,
shall be numbered, shall be dated, shall mature, shall be subject to redemption prior to maturity, shall be
in such form, and shall have such other terms, details, and provisions as are prescribed in the Bond
Indenture, in the form now on file with the City, with the amendments referenced herein. The City
hereby authorizes any or all of the Bonds to be issued as "tax-exempt bonds" the interest on which is not
includable in gross income for federal and State of Minnesota income tax purposes.
All of the provisions of the Bonds, when executed as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a
part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated verbatim herein and shall be in full
force and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof. The Bonds shall be substantially in the
form set forth in the Bond Indenture, which form is hereby approved, with such necessary and appropriate
variations, omissions and insertions (including changes to the name of the Bonds, the aggregate principal
amount of the Bonds, the stated maturities of the Bonds and the maturity dates of the Bonds, the interest
rates on the Bonds, and the terms of optional and mandatory redemption of the Bonds) as the Mayor of
the City and the City Administrator of the City, in their discretion, shall determine. The execution of the
Bonds with the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and the City Administrator and the delivery
of the Bonds by the City shall be conclusive evidence of such determination.
3. The Bonds (i) shall be special limited obligations of the City; (ii) shall be payable solely
from the revenues pledged therefor; (iii) shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any
constitutional or statutory limitation; (iv) shall not constitute nor give rise to a pecuniary liability of the
City or a charge against its general credit or taxing powers; and (v) shall not constitute a charge, lien, or
encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City other than the City's interest in the Loan
Agreement and the Series 2025 Obligation. The proceeds of the Bonds shall be disbursed under the terms
of the Bond Indenture and the Loan Agreement, and the principal, premium, and interest on the Bonds
shall be payable solely from the proceeds of the Bonds, the revenues derived from the Corporation
pursuant to the terms of the Loan Agreement, the revenues derived from the Obligated Group under the
terms of the Series 2025 Obligation, and other funds pledged under the Bond Indenture or the Loan
Agreement.
4. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City Administrator to
execute and deliver the Bond Indenture, and hereby authorizes and directs the execution of the Bonds in
accordance with the terms of the Bond Indenture, and hereby provides that the Bond Indenture shall
4923-9632-0113.1 3
211
provide the terms and conditions, covenants, rights, obligations, duties and agreements of the owners of
the Bonds, the City, and the Bond Trustee as set forth therein.
All of the provisions of the Bond Indenture, when executed as authorized herein, shall be deemed
to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated verbatim herein and shall
be in full force and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof. The Bond Indenture shall be
substantially in the form on file with the City, which is hereby approved, with such necessary and
appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as do not materially change the substance thereof, or as
the Mayor and the City Administrator, in their discretion, shall determine, and the execution and delivery
thereof by the Mayor and the City Administrator shall be conclusive evidence of such determination.
5. The Mayor and the City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to execute and
deliver the Loan Agreement. All of the provisions of the Loan Agreement, when executed and delivered
as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if
incorporated verbatim herein and shall be in full force and effect from the date of execution and delivery
thereof. The Loan Agreement shall be substantially in the form on file with the City which are hereby
approved, with such omissions and insertions as do not materially change the substance thereof, or as the
Mayor and the City Administrator, in their discretion, shall determine, and the execution thereof by the
Mayor and the City Administrator shall be conclusive evidence of such determination.
6. The Bond Trustee is hereby appointed as the initial Paying Agent and Bond Registrar
with respect to the Bonds.
7. The Mayor, the City Administrator, and the Finance Director of the City are hereby
authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, such other documents as are necessary or
appropriate in connection with the issuance, sale, and delivery of the Bonds, including one or more
certificates of the City, an endorsement to the Tax Certificate of the Corporation, an Information Return
for Tax -Exempt Private Activity Bond Issues, IRS Form 8038, and all other documents and certificates as
shall be necessary and appropriate in connection with the issuance, sale, and delivery of the Bonds. The
City hereby approves the execution and delivery by the Bond Trustee of the Bond Indenture and all other
instruments, certificates, and documents prepared in conjunction with the issuance of the Bonds that
require execution by the Bond Trustee. The City hereby authorizes Kutak Rock LLP, Minneapolis,
Minnesota, as bond counsel of the City, to prepare, execute, and deliver its approving legal opinion with
respect to the Bonds.
8. Except as otherwise provided in this resolution, all rights, powers and privileges
conferred and duties and liabilities imposed upon the City or the City Council by the provisions of this
resolution or of the aforementioned documents shall be exercised or performed by the City or by such
members of the City Council, or such officers, board, body or agency thereof as may be required or
authorized by law to exercise such powers and to perform such duties.
No covenant, stipulation, obligation or agreement herein contained or contained in the
aforementioned documents shall be deemed to be a covenant, stipulation, obligation or agreement of any
member of the City Council of the City, or any officer, agent or employee of the City in that person's
individual capacity, and neither the City Council of the City nor any officer or employee executing the
Bonds shall be liable personally on the Bonds or be subject to any personal liability or accountability by
reason of the issuance thereof.
No provision, covenant or agreement contained in the aforementioned documents, the Bonds or in
any other document relating to the Bonds, and no obligation therein or herein imposed upon the City or
the breach thereof, shall constitute or give rise to any pecuniary liability of the City or any charge upon its
4923-9632-0113.1 4
212
general credit or taxing powers. In making the agreements, provisions, covenants and representations set
forth in such documents, the City has not obligated itself to pay or remit any funds or revenues, other than
funds and revenues derived from the Loan Agreement and the Series 2025 Obligation which are to be
applied to the payment of the Bonds, as provided therein and in the Bond Indenture.
9. Except as herein otherwise expressly provided, nothing in this resolution or in the
aforementioned documents expressed or implied, is intended or shall be construed to confer upon any
person or firm or corporation, other than the City or any holder of the Bonds issued under the provisions
of this resolution, any right, remedy or claim, legal or equitable, under and by reason of this resolution or
any provisions hereof, this resolution, the aforementioned documents and all of their provisions being
intended to be and being for the sole and exclusive benefit of the City and any holder from time to time of
the Bonds issued under the provisions of this resolution.
10. In case any one or more of the provisions of this resolution, other than the provisions
contained in the first sentence of Section 3 hereof, or of the aforementioned documents, or of the Bonds
issued hereunder shall for any reason be held to be illegal or invalid, such illegality or invalidity shall not
affect any other provision of this resolution, or of the aforementioned documents, or of the Bonds, but this
resolution, the aforementioned documents, and the Bonds shall be construed and endorsed as if such
illegal or invalid provisions had not been contained therein.
11. The Bonds, when executed and delivered, shall contain a recital that they are issued
pursuant to the Act, and such recital shall be conclusive evidence of the validity of the Bonds and the
regularity of the issuance thereof, and that all acts, conditions, and things required by the laws of the State
of Minnesota relating to the adoption of this resolution, to the issuance of the Bonds, and to the execution
of the aforementioned documents to happen, exist and be performed precedent to the execution of the
aforementioned documents have happened, exist and have been performed as so required by law.
12. The officers of the City, Bond Counsel, other attorneys, and other agents or employees of
the City are hereby authorized to do all acts and things required of them by or in connection with this
resolution, the aforementioned documents, and the Bonds for the full, punctual and complete performance
of all the terms, covenants and agreements contained in the Bonds, the aforementioned documents and
this resolution. In the event that for any reason the Mayor is unable to carry out the execution of any of
the documents or other acts provided herein, any persons delegated the duties of the Mayor shall be
authorized to act in the capacity of the Mayor and undertake such execution or acts on behalf of the City
with full force and effect, which execution or acts shall be valid and binding on the City. If for any
reason the City Administrator is unable to execute and deliver the documents referred to in this resolution,
such documents may be executed by any person delegated the duties of the City Administrator, with the
same force and effect as if such documents were executed and delivered by the City Administrator.
13. The City understands that the Corporation will pay the City's administrative fee upon
issuance of the Bonds. In addition, the Corporation will pay all costs paid or incurred by the City in
connection with the transactions authorized by this resolution, whether or not the Bonds are issued.
14. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage.
4923-9632-0113.1 5
213
Approved by the City Council of the City of Shakopee this 5th day of November, 2025.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
v
4923-9632-0113.1
6
214
KUTAKROCK
Nathan Reinhardt, Finance Director
City of Shakopee
485 Gorman Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
Kutak Rock LLP
60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3400, Minneapolis, MN 55402-4018
office 612.334.5000
October 29, 2025
Julie Eddington
612.334.5013
julie.eddington@kutakrock.com
Re: Resolution approving the issuance of revenue bonds for the benefit of St. Francis Regional
Medical Center
Dear Nate:
St. Francis Regional Medical Center, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the "Corporation"), is requesting
that the City of Shakopee (the "City") issue one or more series of taxable or tax-exempt revenue obligations
(the "Bonds") in the estimated aggregate principal amount not to exceed $70,000,000 to (i) refund the
outstanding Health Care Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (St. Francis Regional Medical Center),
Series 2014 (the "Prior Bonds"), issued by the City in the original aggregate principal amount of
$41,865,000, the proceeds of which financed or refinanced capital improvements to the acute care hospital
facilities of the Corporation located at 1455 St. Francis Avenue in the City, and the construction and
equipping of a new inpatient bed tower, the expansion, improvement, and/or equipping of the Corporation's
emergency department facilities, surgery department facilities, cancer center, diagnostic and
cardiopulmonary services, lab and pharmacy areas, support areas, including plant services and
administrative areas, and other improvements to the Corporation's acute care hospital facilities
(collectively, the "Prior Project"); and (ii) finance the capital costs of the Corporation's Phase 2+ emergency
department expansion and renovation to include additional rooms, triage rooms, isolation rooms, equipment
storage and support space and the relocation and expansion of the ambulance garage, as well as other
improvements to the Corporation's acute care hospital facilities, including but not limited to diagnostics
equipment replacement, facilities replacements including roof top units, and a transfer switch upgrade
(collectively, the "New Project"). The Prior Project and the New Project (together, the "Project") will be
owned and operated by the Corporation.
The Bonds are proposed to be issued in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through
469.1655, as amended (the "Act"). Pursuant to the Act and Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, the City Council is required to conduct a public hearing on the issuance of the Bonds.
As authorized at a prior meeting, the City Council will conduct the public hearing at its meeting on
November 5, 2025. Following the public hearing, the City Council will be asked to consider the enclosed
resolution, which provides final approval to the issuance of the Bonds and authorizes the execution and
delivery of the financing documents.
If issued, the Bonds will be issued pursuant to the Act and secured solely by the revenues derived from a
loan agreement to be executed by the City and the Corporation and from other security provided by the
Corporation. The Corporation is a member of an obligated group (the "Obligated Group"). To secure the
4927-3848-5862.1
KUTAKROCK
Corporation's repayment obligations with respect to the loan of the proceeds of the Bonds, the Obligated
Group will issue an Obligated Group master note under a master trust indenture.
The Bonds will not constitute a general or moral obligation of the City and will not be secured by or payable
from any property or assets of the City (other than the interests of the City in the loan agreement) and will
not be secured by any taxing power of the City. The Bonds will not be subject to any debt limitation
imposed on the City, and the issuance of the Bonds will not have any adverse impact on the credit rating of
the City, even in the event that the Corporation encounters financial difficulties with respect to the Project
to be financed with proceeds of the Bonds.
Each year the City has the ability to designate up to $10,000,000 in tax-exempt bonds as "qualified
tax-exempt obligations" (sometimes referred to as "bank -qualified bonds") for purposes of
Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. In order to issue bank -qualified bonds, an issuer must not expect to issue
more than $10,000,000 of bonds (other than private activity bonds that are not qualified 501(c)(3) bonds)
in a calendar year. Because the principal amount of the Bonds exceeds $10,000,000, the City will be unable
to designate the Bonds or any other bonds to be issued by the City in 2025 as bank qualified.
The Corporation will pay the out-of-pocket expenses of the City with respect to this transaction as well as
the City's administrative fee.
I will attend the public hearing on November 5, 2025. Please contact me with any questions you may have
prior to the City Council meeting.
Sincerely,
Julie Eddington
4927-3848-5862.1
216
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.1
November 18, 2025
Change Order for Dog Park totaling $9,860.00
Bill Delaney, Senior Planner
Michael Kerski
Action to be considered:
Recommend payment of change order
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
Construction Drawings lacked detail about what electrical and plumbing connections
would be required for the irrigation system and how it would be connected to the
Shakopee public Utilities (SPU) street lighting system.
The contractor notified us of concerns at time of construction and adapted and made
connections to move project forward in cooperation with SPU. The work was completed
in a timely and professional manner and was out of the original contract scope.
Change order is less than 2% of overall project costs and is included in the project
contingency.
Overall the project was completed professionally and the dog park is now heavily used.
Recommendation:
Approve a change order in the amount totaling $9,860.00
Budget Impact:
$9,860.00 out of Park Development Funds.
Attachments:
217
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 6.m
November 18, 2025
Additional information to squad that was salvaged and authorized for
disposal from January 21, 2025 meeting
Derek Nordtvedt, Captain
Action to be considered:
On 1/21/25, Squad 233 (VIN 1 FM5K8ABXPGC19575) was declared as salvaged and could
be deposed of. Looking to have a 2025 Ford Explorer (VIN 1 FM5KSAB1 SGB45312)
approved as its replacement.
Motion Type:
Two -Thirds Vote
Background:
On 1/21/25, Squad 233 (VIN 1 FM5K8ABXPGC19575) was declared as salvaged and could
be deposed of due to being involved in a traffic accident. Looking to have a 2025 Ford
Explorer (VIN 1 FM5K8AB1 SGB45312) approved as its replacement.
Recommendation:
Approve
Budget Impact:
none
Attachments:
218
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 9.a
November 18, 2025
Ordinance Creating Standards, Rules and Regulations and Licensing of
Towing Companies.
Michael Kerski, Planning and Development Director
Michael Kerski
Action to be considered:
Approve ordinance
Motion Type:
Simple Majority
Background:
Shakopee Towing has had the city's towing contract for a number of years. There are a
number of other towing companies operating within the city limits that are towing from
private property including a number of businesses and apartment complexes.
These towing companies are currently operating without any regulation can can charge
literally whatever and can demand cash only. The city's Police Department has received
many complaints about towing services from private property including not releasing
cars, requiring significant cash payments, and damages.
This ordinance is modeled after a number of other cities that have experienced the same
issues. It will require Council to adopt licensing fees during the annual fee schedule
update in December 2025.
The police department will discuss issues they have been encountering at the Council
meeting. This Ordinance has been a joint effort between the city attorney and the police
department.
Recommendation:
Approve Ordinance O2025-023 Establishing a Towing Company Licensing Program and
Regulating Consensual and Non -Consensual Towing within the City of Shakopee.
Budget Impact:
Will be run under our current licensing software and fees will cover PD inspections. Fees
will be established in December 2025 Fee Schedule Update.
219
Attachments:
DOCSOPEN-#1057523-v7-Towing_Company_License_Ordinance.docx
220
ORDINANCE NO. O2025-023
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA ADDING CHAPTER 119
TO THE CITY CODE AND ESTABLISHING A TOWING COMPANY LICENSING
PROGRAM AND REGULATING CONSENSUAL AND NON-CONSENSUAL TOWING
WITHIN THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1.. Shakopee City Code, Title XI, is amended by adding Chapter 119 to read as follows:
CHAPTER 119 TOWING COMPANIES
119.01 Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this Chapter is to protect public health, safety, and
consumer rights by licensing towing companies operating within the City of Shakopee, ensuring
adequate insurance, fair and transparent rates, safe equipment, and timely release of vehicles and
personal property. This Chapter establishes operational standards for consensual and
non-consensual towing, storage facilities, and participation in police tow rotations, consistent with
applicable Minnesota law, including Minn. Stat. Ch. 168B, as amended.
119.02. Definitions.
Applicant means any entity making an application for a license under this Chapter.
Application means a form to be completed by the applicant as his or her request for a license,
furnished by the City and required as a prerequisite to the consideration of this issuance of a
license.
City means the City of Shakopee.
Consensual Tow means a tow authorized by the vehicle owner or person in lawful possession of
the vehicle.
Non -Consensual Tow means a tow not authorized by the owner or person in lawful possession of
the vehicle, including police -ordered or private -property ordered tows.
Drop Fee means a fee charged when a non-consensual tow is stopped at the scene and the vehicle
is released before removal from the property or public right-of-way.
Storage Facility means a secure location where towed vehicles are stored until reclaimed by
owner.
1
221
Tow Truck means a motor vehicle designed or used to tow, carry, push, or otherwise transport
another motor vehicle.
Towing Company means any person or entity engaged in towing or towing storage services within
the City.
Vehicle Owner includes the registered owner, lienholder, or person in lawful possession.
119.03. License Required; Exemptions.
A. License Required. No person may operate a Towing Company within the City without first
obtaining a City of Shakopee Towing Company License.
B. Existing Towing Companies. Existing towing companies operating in the City on the effective
date of this Chapter must submit a complete application within ninety (90) days and comply
fully with the requirements in this Chapter within one hundred eighty (180) days.
C. Exemptions. Government agencies performing towing with their own equipment and
employees and a repair garage that tows only vehicles of its own customers as an incidental
service are exempt from obtaining a license under this Chapter, but they must comply with
operational standards set forth in this Chapter when performing non-consensual tows.
119.04. License Term; Transfer Prohibited.
A. Licenses are annual, expiring on December 31 each year.
B. Licenses are non -transferable. Material ownership or control changes of a Towing Company
require a new license.
119.05. License applications, Investigation and Consideration, and License Term and
Renewal.
A. Towing Company License Application. An application for a Towing Company license shall
require the following information:
1. For all Applicants:
(a) Investigation: Provide a completed Background Investigation Application and
Consent for Release of Information for all Licensees/ Owners.
(b) Business location: Provide the street location, mailing address, and telephone
number of the Towing Company's primary business location.
2
222
(c) Storage lot: Provide the street location, address, and telephone number Towing
Company's storage lot(s).
(d) Hours of Operation: Provide the hours of operation of the Towing Company's tow
lot premises where motor vehicles are stored and released.
(e) Surety Bond. A surety bond of at least $10,000 payable to the City of Shakopee for
ordinance compliance.
(f) Rate Schedule: Provide a current schedule of fees or vehicle tow service charges.
(g) Vehicle Identification. Provide the year, make, model and Minnesota license
plate number for each tow truck vehicle used in the Applicant's business.
(h) Inspection. Provide a current copy of the approved Department of Safety and
Inspections documentation.
(i) Insurance. Provide a current Certificate of Liability Insurance with the terms and
limits identified in 119.05(B)(2).
(j) Tow Truck Inventory. A list of tow trucks and equipment (year, make, VIN//unit no.,
capacity) and proof of inspection/maintenance program.
(k) Policy Disclosure. Copy of written consumer information and complaint policy and
process, including how to request vehicle release and personal property retrieval.
B. Application Requirements, Investigation, and Consideration, and License Term
Renewal.
1. Filing. An application for a Towing Company license under this chapter must be filed
with the City.
2. Insurance Requirements.
(a) Each applicant for a Towing Company License shall file with the City a Public
Liability Insurance including General Liability and Automobile Liability policy
from a company authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota, insuring the
Applicant against any and all loss arising out of use, operation or maintenance of
the tow truck service enterprise.
3
223
(b) Commercial Auto Liability: not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per
occurrence;
(c) Garagekeepers Legal Liability (direct primary): not less than $100,000 per vehicle and
$500,000 per occurrence;
(d) General Liability: not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence;
(e) Workers' Compensation as required by law.
(f) Bodily Injury Liability in the amount of not less than $500,000 for injury or death of
any one person in any one occurrence, and not less than $500,000 on account of a claim
by any claimant in any other case arising out of any one occurrence.
(g) The policy of insurance shall be in limits of not less than $1,500,000 for property
damage and bodily injury without limit for any one occurrence. Such property
insurance shall include coverage for damage and theft of property in the care,
custody, and control of the tow truck motor vehicle service.
Failure to keep in full force and affect the insurance required by this Section is
grounds for suspension or revocation of the license.
3. Application and Investigation Fees. Upon submission of the application, Applicants
for a Towing Company license shall pay a non-refundable fee to the City which shall
be considered an application and investigation fee to cover the costs of the City for
processing the application and the investigation thereof. All application and
investigation fees provided for in this Chapter shall be fixed and determined by the
Council. Such fees, may, from time to time, be amended by the Council.
4. Current Information Required. An Applicant must promptly notify the City of a
change in the information or facts required to be furnished on the application for
a license, even after the license has been issued.
5. Renewal of License. Applications for renewal of a Towing Company license under
this Section shall be made at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration date of the
license and shall be in such form as required by the City. Within a reasonable period
after the completion of the renewal application verification process, the renewal
application shall be processed by the City for consideration. Upon denial of a renewal
application, notice shall be sent by regular mail to the Applicant which shall provide
the grounds for such denial. Upon approval of a renewal application, the Issuing
Authority shall renew the applicant's license.
4
224
119.06. License Issuance Procedure
A. Applications. Applications shall be submitted to the City Clerk and shall be accompanied by
the application fee. The City Clerk shall determine if an application is complete within two (2)
regular business days. An application shall be considered completed if all required information
is provided and the fee is paid. Upon determining that the application is completed the City
Clerk shall refer the application to the Chief of Police. The Chief of Police or designee, shall
review the application and conduct an investigation he/she deems necessary including but not
limited to, a criminal history and wanted persons check with the Bureau of Criminal
Apprehension, check with the Better Business Bureau, the Attorney General's office, and
shall approve or deny the application in the manner prescribed in this Section within a
reasonable period of time.
B. Issuance; Denial. If grounds exist under Section 119.06(C) for denying the license, the Chief
of Police shall deny the license; otherwise, the Chief of Police shall issue the license to the
applicant. In the case of denial, the Chief of Police shall notify the Applicant in writing that
his/her application is denied, the reason for denial, and that the Applicant has the right
to appeal the denial as set forth below. Notice shall be delivered in person or by mail to
the business address provided on the license application.
C. The following shall be grounds for denying a license:
1. Fraud or Misrepresentation. The Applicant has failed to truthfully provide any of
the information required by the City as part of the application or failed to pay the
license fee.
2. Criminal Conduct; Conviction. The Applicant has been convicted or is currently
engaging in any crime or crimes directly related to carrying on business that is
directly related to the occupation or business licensed as defined by Minnesota
Statues §364.03 Subd. 2, as it may be amended from time to time; where the applicant
has not shown competent evidence of sufficient rehabilitation and present fitness to
perform the duties and responsibilities as provided in Minnesota Statue §364.03, Sub.
3, as it may be amended from time to time.
3. Previous License Revocation. The revocation of any license issued to the Applicant
for the purpose of conducting business as a tow truck motor vehicle service within
the past five years.
4. Poor Business Reputation. The Applicant is determined to have a bad business
reputation. Evidence of a bad business reputation shall include, but is not limited
to, the existence of a pattern of substantiated complaints against the Applicant with
the Better Business Bureau, the Attorney General's office, or other similarbusiness
or consumer rights office or agency, within the preceding 12 months; a rating of C
5
225
minus (C-) or less with the Better Business Bureau or other similar business or
consumer rights office or agenda; or the existence of substantiated complaints
against the applicant with the City or with any other jurisdiction where the
applicant performed license activities within the preceding 3 years.
5. For any reason set forth in Chapter 110, Section 110.003(E) of this Code.
D. Appeal. An Applicant may appeal the denial of a license by filing a request for a
hearing with the Chief of Police within ten (10) days after the date of mailing of the
notice of denial of the license. If no request for a hearing is received in the time
prescribed, the license shall be deemed denied. If a hearing is requested within the
time prescribed, a hearing shall be scheduled before the City Council within 30
calendar days of the date of the request. Within 10 calendar days after the hearing the
City Council shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision and the reasons
therefore.
E. License Posting. The Applicant shall post the City issued license in the business location
listed on the license application. The City issued license shall be invalidated upon
suspension or revocation and shall immediately be surrendered to the City.
119.07 Private -Property - Non -Consensual Tows.
A. Authorization. No tow may occur without written authorization by the property owner or agent
in lawful control, signed at the time of tow, identifying the reason, date/time, location, and
authorizer's name and phone number. Standing contracts are permitted but a contemporaneous
authorization form must be completed per tow.
B. Signage. A Towing Company may not tow vehicles from private parking areas unless the
parking area contains conspicuous signs at each vehicular entrance stating:
1. Parking restrictions,
2. Unauthorized vehicles will be towed at owner's expense;
3. Towing company name and phone number;
4. The location/address where vehicles are stored; and
5. Towing and retrieval fees
C. Drop Fee. If the owner/driver returns before the vehicle is removed from the property and
requests release, the tow operator must release the vehicle upon payment of a posted drop fee.
D. Distance. Storage facilities for private -property tows must be within [15] road miles of the tow
origin unless otherwise approved by the City.
6
226
119.08. Suspension or revocation
A. Suspension or Revocation. A license issued under and pursuant to this Chapter may be
immediately suspended or revoked by the City by written notice if the license holder:
1. Uses fraud, misrepresentation or false statements during the course of permitted
activity,
2. Material violation of this ordinance, or applicable State law;
3. Has been convicted of any offense, or takes any other action, for which a license could
have been denied under this Chapter;
4. Conducts license activities in an unlawful manner or a manner as to constitute a breach
of peace, or constitute a menace to health, safety or general welfare of the public; or
5. Violates any part of this Chapter.
The suspension shall remain in effect until the license is revoked or the
suspension is lifted subject to the procedure set forth in Section 119.08(B).
B. Procedure. After the suspension or revocation of any license issued under this Chapter,
the City shall notify the license holder in writing of the alleged violation(s) and the
license holder's right to appeal the suspension or revocation.as set forth below. Notice
shall be delivered in person or by mail to the address listed on the license application.
A license holder may appeal the suspension or revocation of a license in the manner
set forth in Section 119.06.D.
119.09. General Provisions and Business Regulations
A. Identification. Tow trucks must display company name, City license number, and USDOT
number in letters ≥ 2 inches high.
B. Credit/Debit Acceptance. Licensees must accept major credit/debit cards for all charges
without additional surcharge beyond the posted rate.
C. Receipts. Provide an itemized receipt showing company information, truck/unit number, tow
location, date/time, itemized charges, payment method, driver's name/ID, and City license
number.
D. Property Release. Upon vehicle owner request, release personal property from a towed vehicle
at no charge during posted business hours; essential property (e.g., meds, IDs, car seats) must
be released at any time without charge.
E. Vehicle Release. Provide access to release vehicles during at least 8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m.,
Monday —Friday, exclusive of City holidays, and provide after-hours release within 60 minutes
of request; any after-hours gate fee must be within City maximums.
7
227
F. Records. Maintain tow and storage records for at least two (2) years and make available to the
City upon request.
G. Equipment and Safety. Trucks and equipment must be maintained in safe condition; drivers
must be properly licensed and trained.
H. Damage and Claims. Exercise due care; promptly process damage claims; maintain photos and
documentation per Subd. I.
I. Documentation. For every non-consensual tow, take time -stamped photos (or video) of
1. Vehicle position condition before hookup;
2. Signage at private property (if applicable);
3. Hookup; and
4. Vehicle at storage facility. Retain for two (2) years.
J. Prohibited Practices. Predatory or patrol towing without a call; payment to property owners
for authorization; misrepresentation; blocking a vehicle to coerce payment; charging unposted
fees; or violating private -property signage rules.
K. Storage Lot. Notwithstanding 119.07(C), all licensees shall, immediately upon hooking up
to a vehicle, be towed from private property, tow the vehicle directly to the storage lot
listed on the license application. Such towed vehicle shall not be temporarily dropped,
placed, or left at any other lot on any other property.
L. Posting Fee Schedule. The schedule of fees shall be posted at the business location. The
accepted method(s) of payment must be displayed with fee schedule.
M. Posting Hours of Operation. The hours of operation shall be posted at the business location.
119.10 Storage Facility Standards.
A. Security. Fencing at least six (6) feet high with controlled gate access, adequate lighting, and
surveillance or equivalent security measures.
B. Surface/Drainage. All-weather surface with proper drainage and snow/ice removal.
C. Access. Public reception area with posted hours, rates, and complaint contact and must have
an ADA-compliant access to the reception area.
D. Inventory/Notice. Tag and inventory of each vehicle upon arrival; comply with Minnesota
impound notice and lien procedures.
8
228
119.12 Inspections.
A. Licensed premises, records, and towing vehicles (i.e. tow trucks) are subject to inspections by
authorized City officials to verify compliance with this Chapter.
B. Authorized officials may enter the premises at any reasonable time. If the licensee objects to
the inspection, the City official shall obtain an administrative search warrant before conducting
the inspection.
C. Failure to respond to or allow an investigation of the premises, records, and vehicles, creates a
rebuttable presumption of a violation of this chapter which may be grounds for adverse action.
119.13. Violations. Violations of the above general provisions shall constitute grounds for
revocation of the license. Notice of the violations shall be served in writing. Three days
(following the date the notice was given) shall be given for the license holder to make the
require corrections. If, after three days, the area and/or activity remain in noncompliance, the
license shall be immediately revoked.
119.14 Enforcement; Penalties; Remedies
A. Criminal Enforcement. Any person, firm, or corporation who violates any provision of this
chapter shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a misdemeanor. The penalty of which may be
imposed for any crime which is a misdemeanor under this code, shall be a sentence of not more
than 90 days or a fine of not more than $1,000, or both.
B. Administrative Citations; Administrative Fines. Violations of this ordinance may be enforced
by administrative citation per city code. Administrative Fines are outlined in City Code and
established by the City Council. Each day a violation continues constitutes a separate offense
for purposes of calculating the fine.
C. Restitution. The City may order restitution or fee refunds to impacted consumers.
D. Penalties Cumulative. The penalties, remedies, and procedures provided under this Chapter
are cumulative.
119.16 Summary Suspension; Emergency Action.
When necessary to protect public safety or prevent consumer harm, the Chief of Police may
summarily suspend a license pending a hearing before the City Council, held as soon as
practicable.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and
publication.
9
229
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this 18th
day of Noevmber, 2025.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
Attest:
City Clerk
Published in the New Prague Times on the day of , 2025.
10
230
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 10.a
November 18, 2025
City Bill List
Becky Smith, Accounting Specialist
Action to be considered:
Review of City Bill List
Motion Type:
Informational only
Background:
The City Bill has been provided to the City Council.
Recommendation:
Review of City Bill List
Budget Impact:
N/A
Attachments:
231
SHAKOPEE
Agenda Item:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Shakopee City Council 10.b
November 18, 2025
News and Announcements
Rick Parsons
Action to be considered:
No action, item is informational only.
Motion Type:
Informational only
Background:
Announcements and Upcoming Events:
- Winter Parking Restrictions
• Winter parking restrictions are now in effect and run until April 1. No parking is
allowed from 2:00 am - 6:00 am on City Streets. certain exceptions apply within the
Calendar Zone. Please visit www.ShakopeeMN.gov/winterparking for more
information.
- Holiday Fest 2025
• Holiday Fest is Saturday, December 6, 2025, from 2:00 - 6:00 pm in Downtown
Shakopee. Holiday Fest is a celebration to kick-off the holiday season. There will be a
winter vendor marketplace, pictures with Santa, a tree lighting, and fireworks. Come
join in the holiday fun! More information can be found on the Shakopee Chamber of
Commerce website.
Recommendation:
Please review the information on upcoming news and announcements.
Budget Impact:
N/A.
Attachments:
232