HomeMy WebLinkAbout15.A.2. Scott County 2005-2012 Highway Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
IS'. ff.L ~
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor & City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Final Scott County 2005-2012 Highway
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
DATE: January 18, 2005
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is a Final Scott County Highway Department 2005-2012 Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) for Council review and discussion prior to the City
commenting to Scott County by January 21, 2005. Also attached is the previous letter
sent to Gregory Illka of Scott County on the initial draft of the County's Capital
Improvement Program.
BACKGROUND:
Scott County Highway Department conducts a 5-year TIP for the improvements of the
Scott County Highway System on an annual basis. County staff has been involving City
staff in the working and formation of the Draft Scott County Highway TIP, which was
reviewed by Council on June 1, 2004. Scott County has revised the TIP due to funding
shortfalls and has submitted a revised TIP for Cities to comment on, which is now an 8
year program.
Staff has reviewed the TIP and has attached a draft letter to be sent to Lez1ie Vermillion
of the Scott County Public Works Division on the original draft of Scott County Highway
Dypartment's TIP. Staff would like to present the Scott County 8-year TIP to the City
Council that affect the City of Shakopee for their review and comment on priorities for
the City. Comments need to be sent by January 21,2005 to Scott County.
AL TERNATIVES:
1. Provide staff direction and comments on the Final Scott County 2005-2012 TIP.
2. Do not provide any comments at this time.
3. Table for specific information.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No.1, to provide the County comments on the City of
Shakopee's concerns on the Scott County Highway Department's 2005-2012 TIP so
these comments can be considered by County staff and ultimately presented to the
County Board for consideration.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Provide staff direction and comments to be included in the response letter to Scott
County.
b4:6
Public Works Director
BUpmp
ENGRlEMPLOYEEFOLDERlPPENNINGTONCOUNClUCOUNTY C1P-2
DRAFT
January 13, 2005
Ms. Lezlie Vermillion
Public Works Director
Scott County Public Works Division
600 Country Trail East
Jordan,Mn 55352
RE: Final Draft Scott County Transportation Improvement Plan
2005-2012
Dear Ms. Vermillion:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Pinal Draft Scott County
Transportation Improvement Plan for the years 2005-2012. The following comments are
:from City staff and City Council from the January 18,2005 Council meeting:
2005
. The City of Shakopee supports the inclusion of c.R. 16 (1 ih Avenue), from C.R.
15 to c.R. 79. City staff believes the County should also include the
improvements of c.R. 79, from T.H. 169 to 2000 feet south of 17th Avenue, as
part of the improvement program for 2005. The City and County staff, along with
the school district and the developer of property along 1 ih Avenue have been
working with the County to put forth an improvement project which maximizes
the City, County and school district's dollars. It appears that the City and school
will be able to pay the County's portion for County improvements in 2005, with
the County reimbursing the City and school district in years 2006 and 2007. The
City and school district would prefer that the County find additional funds, if
available at the end of 2005 to pay their portion or provide these additional funds
to the 1 ih A venue segment to C.R. 83. Although C.R. 77 is technically a County
road today, it is scheduled to be turned back to the City. The City would request
turn back funds be provided to the City.
. 17th Avenue, from Southern Meadows to C.R. 83. This project is currently under
a feasibility study by the City of Shakopee. It is currently estimated that the
County's portion would be approximately 1 million dollars to pay for the
oversizing and improvements that the County wants to incorporate in this
roadway. There is no mention of this project or potential funding for this
improvement project.
. CSAH 21, from CSAH 18 to CSAH 42, the City of Shako pee is still on record for
supporting and proceeding with CSAH 21 improvements and the CSAH 21 EIS
be completed as soon as possible.
. Valley View Road and c.R. 83 intersection improvements and the associated cost
participation by the County is not shown as a safety improvement.
. The City supports the County in proceeding with a project on C.R. 101 east of
CSAH 17 using State turn back funds. The City and SPUC would replace its
utility lines if a major pavement restoration project is done. The City is planning
to replace the East River District Trunk Sewer line in this area in 2005, however,
can wait until 2006 if the county moves forward on a pavement restoration project
for 2006.
. The City of Shakopee would support traffic control signals at intersection that
meet warrants. Intersections of concern would be CSAH 16 & CSAH 18, 4th
Avenue and CR 83, and CR 79 and 1 ih Avenue.
2006
. Again, 17th Avenue, :from Southern Meadows to c.R. 83, there is no funding
shown in the Transportation Improvement Program for County improvements.
Staff believes the completion of this roadway segment will be an improvement for
the entire County system, particularly CSAH 17 and T .H. 169. Support :from the
County should be included in the 2005 TIP or the 2006 TIP.
2007
. The only City project is for the final year funding for the 17th Avenue, :from C.R.
15 to c.R. 79. If funds become available earlier, the City would request that this
project be funded.
2008 & 2009
. C.R. 21, :from C.R. 16 to C.R. 18 is shown in the 2008 year and from C.R. 16 to
c.R. 42 in 2009. The question is could these projects be done together, will they
be separate projects or how will the projects be constructed?
2012
. CSAH 17 improvements is moved to 2012 and the City feels that this may be
later than the improvements that St. Prancismay be needing for their medical
campus and the rerouting of roads in that area. Staff feels that this project should
be coordinated with roadway improvements in the St. Francis Medical campus.
From. the initial draft plan that was reviewed on June 1, 2004 to the Revised
Transportation Plan, which is now an eight year program, the County did not include any
im~rovements for c.R. 15, from T.H. 169 to the future 1 ih Avenue, c.R. 83, south of
17t Avenue to the City limit line, or C.R. 16, from c.R. 83 to c.R. 18. The City of
Shakopee understands the financial restraints that have arisen to the changes in the
Revised Transportation Improvement Plan. However, the City would hope that the
County would recognize the City's participation in recent projects such as C.R. 83 and
C.R. 16, and CSAH 17 south ofTH 169.
The City would also ask the County to revisit its storm water rules and its cost
implementations on highway projects.
In summary, the City of Shakopee supports the County's efforts in improving the
highways in the County, as identified in the Final Draft 2005-2012 Transportation
Improvement Plan, with our comments and modifications noted in this letter. In
particular, the City could like the County to reevaluate its funding to include its share of
improvements for 1 ih A venue by C.R. 83, and intersection improvements by c.R. 83 and
Valley View Road. If you have any questions in regard to this letter, please feel free to
contact me at (952) 233-9361.
Sincerely,
Bruce Loney, P.E.
Public Works Director
BIJpmp
ENGRlEMPLOYEEFOLDERlPPENNlNGTONIWORDITIP
Cc: Mayor & City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
I
June 2, 2004
Gregory Illka
Scott County Public Works Division
600 Country Trail East
Jordan,MN 55352
RE: Scott County Highway Department 2005-2009
Highway Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Dear Greg:
This letter in response to your letter dated May 5, 2004 and in regard to the City of
Shakopee's comments and recommendations on Scott County Highway Department's
2005-2009 CIP. Staff has reviewed the current County CIP with City Council and has
the following comments and recommendations for you to consider:
. CSAH 21, from CSAH 18 to CSAH 42 - The City of Shako pee has recently gone
on record for support in proceeding with CSAH 21 improvements and would ask
that the project remain in the 5-year CIP and CSAH 21 EIS be completed as
scheduled.
. 1 ih Avenue, from c.R. 15 to C.R. 79 - This extension of 17th Avenue is
necessary for recently annexed areas from Jackson Township to occur and support
the Shakopee School District's referendum of constructing a new high school and
secondary school along 17th Avenue between C.R. 77 and C.R. 79. This project
has not been included in Scott County's CIP and the City is requesting that it be
included.
. C.R. 79, from 11 th A venue to CR 78 - The City of Shakopee anticipates growth in
this area and a future high school and secondary school is anticipated to be built
west of c.R. 79 by 2007. The City requests that a study be done to determine the
necessary improvements for this road and for road improvements to be included
in the 5-year CIP.
. CSAH 17 and Vierling Drive Intersection Improvements for Improved Traffic
Circulation - The City of Shakopee would request that a study be conducted to
determine what improvements can and should be done in order to improve traffic
circulation in this very high volume and traffic movement area.
. CSAH 17 Improvements at 10th Avenue and 4th Avenue - The City has been
successful in obtaining Federal grants to improve these intersections and would
request a study be done to determine what improvements can be done within the
time frame and needed improvements. Preliminary indications are that Scott
County will look at possible signal improvements for these intersections, as the
current three lane design is performing well and a 5-lane intersection
improvement should be coordinated with an overall corridor study and
improvement schedule for C.R. 17, from C.R. 101 to Vierling Drive.
. CSAH 16, from C.R. 83 to CSAH 18 - The City of Shakopee anticipates further
development in this area and with the number of driveways off of existing CSAH
16 in the area from C.R. 83 to McKenna Road, the City believes these
improvements to CSAH 16 should be programmed in anticipating future traffic
increases and potential safety problems.
. c.R. 15 Improvements, from T.H. 169 to future 1 ih Avenue - The City is
anticipating commercial growth in this area and necessary improvements may be
warranted due to the traffic volume and growth in the area. The City of Shakopee
would request a County review and the need for this project and possibly included
in the CIP.
. 4th A venue and C.R. 83 Signal and Turn Lane Improvements - These
improvements would depend on the building of the Shenandoah Business Park
and future expansion of the Opus development, as described in the Shenandoah
Business Park and Opus AUAR. Staff believes these improvements will be
needed by the year 2006-2007.
. Traffic Control Signals for Intersection of C.R. 79 and Vierling Drive; and
CSAH 18 and CSAH 16 and C.R. 83 and Valley View Road - Staff believes these
intersections should be reviewed in the next 5 years for possible traffic control
signal warrants and justification for signal installation.
. CSAH 83 South of 1 ih A venue to City Limit Line - The City of Shakopee would
request a study and possible project for improving CSAH 83 in the future.
. CSAH 17, from St. Francis Avenue to C.R. 78 - The City of Shakopee supports
the improvement of CSAH 17 in this area and would request that these
improvements coincide with the possible relocation of St. Francis Avenue, future
signal at CSAH 17 and construction of Valley View Road, from Evergreen Lane
to Sarazin Street. These improvements will result due to the expansion of St.
Francis Medical Center plans.
This concludes my list of comments and recommendations for potential highway
improvements for the year 2005-2009. Please review this list and our attached map
showing the requests and if you have any questions in regard to my suggestions, please
feel :free to contact me at Shakopee City Hall.
Sincerely,
/Ju-~
Bruce Loney .
Public Works Director
BVpmp
ENGRlEMPLOYEEFOLDERlPPENNINGTONILETlERSIlLKKA
I:
Ii ~
I
I:
III CO
III
II
I HIGHWA Y
I
i
,I TRANSPORT A TION
III
i IMPROVEMENT
' I
I
I! PROGRAM
i
Ii ,
(TIP)
Ii
, I FINAL DRAFT
Ii
II
II
Ii !
I
I
II
I
II
I .. I
I l """'"
Stt SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
I ~".,.. COI:t- HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. 600 COUNTRY TRAIL EAST. JORDAN, MN 55352-9339
(952) 496-8346 . Fax: (952) 496-8365 . WWW.co.scott.mn.us
I LEZLlE A. VERMILLION
PUBLIC WQRKS DIRECTOR .-.......'--;
I December 14, 2004
Bruce Loney, Engineer
I City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street S
Shakopee,~ 55379
I Subject: Final Draft Scott County Transportation Improvement Program
I Dear Mr. Loney:
Attached you will find a draft Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) that was presented to the
I Board in a recent workshop and the County's response to agency requests. As part'of our ongoing
analysis of the County's transportation needs, we completed an evaluation of our 5-year Capital
Improvement Program (CIP). Currently the approved 2004-2008 HighwayCIP is $40 million over.
I programmed. Acknowledging the problem and providing leadership to address it, the County Board
approved a Preliminary Levy in September that included a 2.5% increase ($1 million) for highway
funding. This is a long way.from solving tl1eproblem, but it is a start. Working with our partners we are
confident we can find good solutions to the challenges we face. -
I 'c
In the process of trying to deal with a $40' million shortfall, we used the, criteria set forth in the
Transportation Plan (safety & capacity issues, traffic volumes, fundip.g, etc.) to prioritize our program. As
I you will see, the program extends the 5-year program (2005-2009) to an 8-year program (2005-2012)
without adding any new projects or requests from the community partners. ,In preparing this draft, we
made the assumption of a 2.5% increasein levy each year, $1QOK annual State;Aid i~crease, and 5%
I annual inflation. We also reviewed project schedules and needs according to safety, preservation, and
expansion and made changes basedonth(}se needs.
I We understand that our community partners are affected by these changes. We request your ideas, input,
and suggestions. To ensure proper time for incorporating changes prior to final draft presentation to the
County Board, we request comments be returned to us by January 21, 2005.
I
I We appreciate your cooperation and know that by working together we, as the Scott County community,
will move forward to meet these transportation funding challenges. If you have any questions, please
contact myself at 952-496-8062 or Mary Keen at 952-496-8491.
I 7ldIUL
I
Lezlie A. Vermillion
I Public Works Director
I W:\ WORD\C1P\2005-20 12\05-12_ dra ftcip _ citiesre\~ew ,doc
An Equal Opportunity/Safety Aware Employer
I
I TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
I Scott County Highway Department
The Scott County Highway Department is responsible for the plarining, design,
I construction and maintenance of roads, bridges and traffic control deviceson the
.',""',~ County Highway system. The department works with cities, tOwnship-s; adjacent
I counties, Mn/DOT, and Metropolitan Council to develop and maintain the county's
highway infrastructure.
I May 2001 Transportation Plan Goals
I Scott County is committed to providing a safe and efficient transportation system
for current and future residents and businesses in a cost-effective manner. The
Transportation Plan includes the following goals to carry out this commitment:
I 1.. To PRESERVe the existing transportation infrastructure, in order to protect
I the significant investment already made, and reduce unnecessary premature
costs of replacing of existing facilities.
I 2. To MANAGE the existing transportation system to maximize safety a.nd
efficiency.
I 3. To IMPROVE and EXPAND the existing transportation system as necessary to
meet current and future transportation needs. ,
I
4. To explore ALTERNATIVE MODES' OF TRANSPORTATION based on the ~
I needs of those who live, work, and travel in Scott County.
I .,,5;.;40 provide TRANSPORTATION PLANNING that results in a local
transportation system that will safely serve the needs of current and future
residents and businesses, support the County's development plans, and
I compliment the regional transportation system.
I Programming Strategies
Projects included in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) implement
I needs identified in the Scott County Transportation Plan. The plan also includes
, policies to guide the development of the Scott County Transportation System. The
I 2005-2012 TIP is organized by preservation, management, and expansion projects.
I
I
I The following program development criteria are used and are consistent with the
Transportation Plan policies.
I Program Development Criteria
I . Local agency requests
Structural. deficiencies S "--
. .-->-';:..
. Safety issues
I . Geometric deficiencies
. Capacity issues
I . Traffic volumes
. System connections / continuity
I . Balance staff workload / ability to deliver
. Funding partners
I Individual projects are then prioritized using the following criteria:
I . Maximize safety - correct existing peficiencies in geometry and capacity
. Reduce operating/maintenance cost - correct existing deficiencies. i.rt
structure.
I . Minimize social and environmental impacts in the most cost-effective
manner.
I . Maximize effective project size.
. Utilize all possible funding sources.
I The following process is used for gathering. public. inputfor developing the Annua!
TIP.
I . May Circulate latest TIP to local agencies for comments
I . June Receive comments from local agencies
. July VVorkshopwith County Board
. Aug. Circulate draft TIP to local agencies for comments
I . Nov. Summarize comments and prepare final TIP
. Dec. TIP presentation and County Board Adoption
I
I
I
I
I
I 2005 Highlighted Projects
I Preservation Projects
I Bridge Replacements - The bridges listed, identified as deficient, are programmed for
replacement. Tnese structureS are generally a large box culvert that meet the State's --
definition of a bridge, and are eligible for replacement using State Bridge Bonding funds.
I Generally, the projects wait for funding availability unless the bridge is in such critical
condition that it poses a danger.
I Management Projects
I CSAH 2 - Intersection Improvement at TH 13. J oint project with Mn/DOT is
planned as the construction of a roundabout.
I CSAH 42 - "Segment 8", Huntington/Glendale access and intersection improvements to
support the CSAH 42 Corridor Study.
I CR 64 - TH 169 Interchange - The County, is considering short term borrowing to
I expedite this important safety project that is in MnDOT's 10 year work plan. MnDOT
would reimburse the County in 2009 ~ 2010.
I CR 66 - City of Jordan has received MnDOT Access Management funding to consolidate
intersections along this area of TH21. c
I Intersection Lighting - The County Board has adopted a policy of installing intersection
lighting at rural county highway intersections that meet certain criteria.
I Expansion. Projects
I CSAH2 - Phase 1 is fhe upgrade of CSAH 2 from 1-35 to Church St. in New Market.
This section of CSAH 2 will be upgraded to a four-lane divided highway with turn lanes and
I shoulders, transitioning to a three lane section west of CSAH 91. Increased development
in the Elko-New Market area has increased traffic volumes on the highways in this area.
CSAH 2 is also an important east-west connection between Scott and Dakota Counties.
I CSAH 16 - Shakopee 17th Avenue - the City and County have agreed that 17th Avenue will
I become a County Highway in the future when connected to CSAH 83. As a County Highway
it needs to be constructed to an arterial highway standard which is greater than a city
collector standard. The County pays for the "oversizing" costs.
I
I
--- lilii- -~, -- -- -~ ....- -~ _c ...-- -~ -- -~ --- --- -~ ---, -" -----
!
Scott County, Minnesota l~"
2005 - 2012 S:tt
l\-~'CO-:'
Transportation Improvement
Program
LEGEND
2005 Ii':"T'''7",,',10?,y~ 2008 2011
~- 2006 ~fl',,~.. \,,'!\;:Z2-LS~'1iia 2009 2012
~C} 2007 2010
~1
0
86
N Map Date: October 8, 2004
w*" 8500 0 8500 17000
, Scale: R.F.: This ctavving is nenhera Iegal1Yfecaded tnSlp I1OJ' a survey and is not interned to be
used as one. This draVYing is a compilation of reoords, information. and dala located
S Feet 1 inch = 17,000 teet I: 204,000 in variouscil:y, county, and state offices. and other sources affecting the area smwn,
and is to be used for reffil"eTJce purposes OI'lly. Scott Cconty is not responsible for any
inaCGl.tBcles herein contained. If discrepancies are fcurd, please cortact the Scolt
CountySurveya-sOffice.
layout Name: ClP Revenue Madel (Layout) Project localion: S:\lOCAlGIS\OEPARTMENTS\TRANSPORTATION\PROJECTS\5yearC1P.APR
~
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2005 FINAL DRAFT
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Total
Road Type of. Project Other County Anticipated
No. Location Length Construction Cost Costs Costs Revenue
Levy 5,279,000
State-Aid 3,200,000
Belle Plaine Payment 100,000
PRESERVATION
-- County-Wide 10.00 Overlay/CIR 2,000,000 0 2,000,000
5 Belle Plaine Twp 0,10 Bridge Replacement - 92776 239.425 194,250 45,175
6 Blakeley Twp 0.10 Bridge Replacement - L2987 239,425 194,250 45,175
15 Helena 1;';"'p - Sand Creek 0.1-0 Bridge Replacement - L3049 239,375 194,250 45,125
I
51 Blakeley Twp 0.05 Bridge Replacement - L3040 221,125 136,5.00 84,625
MANAGEMENT
2 TH 13 -- Intersection Improvement (Roundabout) 221,025 221,025
17 Railroad Tracks - Shakopee -- Railroad Crossing Gates 150,250 122,625 27,625
37 TH 19 -- Traffic Signal & Intersection Imp 1,320,000 1,170,000 150,009
42 Huntington/Glendale (Segment 8) -- Signal/Access 1,389,340 694,670 694,670
64 TH 169 Belle Plaine Interchange Construction 20,000,000 19,000,000 1,000,000
66 TH21 -- Intersection Improvements 361,570 361,57()\
-- Intersection Lighting -- Install intersection lights 40,000 40,000~
-- Unspecified -- Traffic Signals 665,000 665,OQO
Spot Safety
Contingency
EXPANSION
16 CH 15 to CH 79 (17th Avenue) 1 4 Lane divided 350,000 350,000
2 NM Area Hall to Interstate 35 2.53. Reconstruct - 4 Lane Divided 8,580,000 220,000 8,360,000
36,016,535 21,926,545 14,089,99? 8,579,000
ASSUMPTIONS:
5% Annual Inflation
$100K annual State-Aid Increase
2.5% Annual Levy Increase 2005
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: 2005 Overlays Location Map
I Project Number:
~- --- -". -"::,..
Location: Various - Countywide Countywide Locations
I
I Description: Bituminous Overlays for pavement
preservation
I Purpose & Justification:
As part of an overall pavement preservation program
I overlays are needed on a regular basis to preserve.
the initial paving investment.
I
Prior To Beyond
I Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Federal Grants , 0
State Grants 0
I State-Aid ,'" 0
County 2,000,000 , 2,000,000
Other I City 0
Other , , 0
I Other , 0
Total 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 .0 0 2,000,000
I ,
Prior To Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006,. 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Desi2n - Staff 0
Desh!n - Consultant 0
Ri2ht-of-Wav - Staff 0
I Rh!ht-of-Wav - Consultant 0
Ri2ht-of-Way 0
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 2,000,000 2,000,000
I Total o 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000
I
I 05 Overlays
I
Scott County Highway Department
I 2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
,
I Project Title: Replace Bridge #92776 Location Map
I',' Project Number: 70-605-06 \\__1.._....(....'.----"'......-.-..-...__ "/"',.,:' , ~
'., w, ~ 25lllI>ST.W. .., \.,,;:'.. ,C ~_...
Location: CSAH 5 in Belle Plaine Twp 5 ~ ~ .' '.~r' '.' "...-' "
I . · a; <:",'s50hST. w.
%v-# 92776', ~
,. .
.. ,........_, 'l1. ;:
Description: Replace culvert (Bridge #92776) 260i. ST, Iw, t......_.....,1 .../-_...............i ~ \ "~ i
I on CSAH 5 ) I ~ ;:.;~,......,(
,-- / ~ I~ '; . "';
iL. 265tn ST w. 0 lA i,
t Purpose & Justification: : L\ ~ ~. 1
. "R'R~ 270lJl ST.
Replace a structurally deficient culvert (bridge). ,5TW.. ;
I
I
Prior To Beyond
I' Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Federal, Grants 0
State Grants 194,250 194,250
I State-Aid 0
County 550 44,625 45,175
Other I City 0
I OiliH .. 0
. . Other 0
'"
Total 550 238,875 0 0 0 0 0 239,425
I ~ 'Prior To Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I D~m-~ff 0
Desi2n - Consultant 550 550
Ril!ht-of- Way - Staff 0
I Ril!ht-of-Wav - Consultant 2.625 2,625
Ril!ht-of-Wav 15,750 15,750
Construction - Staff 0
I Construction - Consultant D
Construction 220,500 220,500
I Total 550 238,875 0 0 0 0 0 239,425
I
I 92776(CSAH 5)
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Replace Bridge #L2987 location Map
I Project Number: 70-606-010 ~~ 1'~$f:~~""
"='" ,........
~.., . "
.,.,....,. \3 / .
~ \ '
Location: On CSAH 6 in Blakeley Township ~. ~ ;' _! __""? ~ l(
" '^. aI ,:' ..-" .. .' /i,iii) ~.I
I
~C\ ~~' "\
1 ", ~ {.... ";" <.
,I t..... >
Description: Replace culvert (Bridge #L2987) } ",,",9-: "', (298 .':It... "'-"'c ",
I on CSAH 6 ~" ' \, )'1 ;/,-> -=~"_.- ~ -
Purpose & Justification: ,V-" ' 'I' , "1;f-
~ 00 .. ,
I 1 .,'... 4'.Al<E1.EV \ 1 ~ / '" ...)
" . \ ~ 0 .. ~
Replace a structurally deficient culvert (bridge). """. 1":: it "9/ ~ .'
';., . 1 :' / ..,
r. . .. . .
~,. ~
I
I Prior To .', Beyond
Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
.J Federal Grants -.0
State Grants 194,250 " ... " " 194,250
I State-Aid 0
County 550 44,625 45,175
Other I City 0
, ", ,
.1 Other
Other
"
I Total 550 238,875 '0 ", o ,.' 0 0 0 239,425
" , I
Prior To . C Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2,008 " ,2009 2009 Total
I Desil?;n - Staff .. 0
Desil!n - Consultant 550 550
I Right-of-Wav - Staff 0
Right-of-Way - Consultant 2,625 2,625
Right-of-Wav 15,750 15,750
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant . , 0
Construction 220,500 220,500
I Total 550 238,875 0 0 0 0 0 239,425
I
I L2987(CSAH 6)
I
Scott County Highway Department
I 2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Replace Bridge #L3049 Location Map
~, ~.~
I . ::!:::umber~nCSAH:::~:~:dcree~ ~ -~\~ :~S__:__;~ >
I' south ofCSAH 2 ~\ , 'i ~
r: /L3049 ~. ~
Description: Replace culvert (Bridge #L3049) ~,~~ :"$""),'.1 \}..'.'.j \
I on CSAH 15 g .Ul z;<lth J "\ ST w, ~ \"..,., "'
',r,'~ ~"'VE I ) i.. " i
. .'....r, c:::::>" ,,', "
" Purpose & Justification: ~ . 'd~ d r;.. f c. I '\".1
I :r ,t:::::;r, 37 ~wt....f\ ·
J;Y'~';: t'. " , ~.
'.. Replace a structurally deficient culvert (bridge). 21, \ I 37 J ..~ ~ " 89'1 ~I' //1""
,.'" " ,I'( ~ I
I
I Prior To Beyond
" ." ','
Project Financing: ' 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Federal Grants .0
. State Grants ,','. ' 194,250 ' 194,250
State-Aid 0
I County 500 44,625,' 45,125
Other I City " 0
Other .. "., · " '. 0
I Other .. .'. ',' , 0
Total " 500238,875 0 -,. .' 0 - 0 0 0 239,375
I Prior To .. Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005:. 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Desi1!n - Staff 0
Desi~n - Consultant 500 500
Right-of-Way - Staff 0
I Right-of-Way - Consultant 2,625 2,625
". Right-of-Way 15,750 15,750
Construction - Staff 0
I Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 220,500 220,500
I Total 500 238,875 0 0 0 0 0 239,375
I
I l3049(CSAH 15)
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Replace Bridge #L3040 Location Map
0'.~
Project Number: SAP 70-598-03 '..-..... .'" ';;.. 60 ~
I ' ""
/' '"'\
- '
'-~'''''''''.. ,';:<:'" . .~--'. "
Location: CR 51 in Blakeley Township '..- ,....." .'.$'"., ~ ""-~''\.o''",_.,- '. ~"- ./.~.......
. , . \.~.... .-'~) ~ \...~
I \.' . '-a. ..,rJ ~
Description: Replace existing bridge #L3040 ,,~, -"'''\, ~ ~ \.-..,-=
stone arch bridge. ..--~ t ,.", ~.. Sf
-- '. ~ """ ' ..
... ~ sr. '14-
I ~--1 ~:S
Purpose & Justification: L 3040 :" ..." ~ ;
'-. "--"'''''.., '\."",., , \'1_ __,:/ ~
Purpose is to replace a structurally deficient bridge. ~ ~.... -.,. !
I U~ l!: ..,. .. '"
This replacement will complete work needed for tumback .,..,-~ ..-/
'4~". ~. ~ /
ofCR 51 to Blakeley Township. ~. t .\....._..~..,/,.'. . .,..'>> ~1
. .:' / .~.}
I '~.._r--""-" ~ / """
.. ." ... t"'.
~' /'
~..' -'"
~ o. ~'. ~
I - "J .~ , '" ....
Prior To Beyond
Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Federal Grants 0
State Grants 136,500 , 1.36,50.0
State-Aid "'" 01
I County 40,000 44,625 84,625 I
Other / City~ " 0
Other ", .' 0
.1 Other , .' 0
, .. " - '
, Total ',' " 40,000 181,125 0 0 0 0 , 0 221,125
~I ". ---...'- 'c' _.. , .. , .
'-_ .._co " Prior To Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 '2009 Total -
. Design - Staff , -0
I _ r ~_ ._: ~. ~ ~_,.
Design- Consultant 40,000 40,000
-
Right-of- Wav - Staff 0
RighH>f-Way - Consultant 2,625 2,625
I Right-oC-Way 5.250 5,250
Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
I Construction 173,250 173,250
Total 40,000 181,125 0 0 0 0 0 221,125
I
I
I L3040(CR 51)
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005.- 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
'I Project Title: CSAH 2 @ TH 13 Roundabout Location Map
I Project Number: " !, 'f i '-~, S1Palric~
- ..~~ Ir i "''''-S6 &"
..- ,~ ~i;. ~l $1,. 2
'6_C~dM ~ .;$ f.s..! I~" 2i ""
..-. ~ ' t..ol W. .~.' ~ . ('
Location: CSAH 2 at TH 13 ~\ I~ :::. -, ~ -'
. M_. ... - -.. -.t.. .... -'l-,~ on! .....-. - ....~t:. ..'M ._M .._. ~.... ~.tf~.,.,,~~
I ' ~ ..g."", =.0,., ..
S , r .\
Description: Safety Improvement -'~T " V ," ! CEDAR
~:.~' ~~~ ~I ,'i LAKE}
l~ >"'-.-f ~ ~ il 2\'0" ~
I '- '-'" ' , i w!l:
'\ 31>).... ST,!!.! is :;;
Purpose & Justification: \ ~ ! .
fi ' <C.~ ...
~ ~ . ~ ,,,,.
. ~\, ~ .
! . ~.--- p
I Crash Rate indicates something must be done T ~ _....~..,.:l':''")':I, P. Z "...
i IY !
o ~
. ... ..-.. I-
Signal warrants were met, MnDOT has chosen a ) )~ ! ~, ! ~: /~~~
roundabout instead. ).~il 'i\ EP J--t-~\
I l~}"" \ I
I .'
Prior To I Beyond
Project Financing: 200S 2005 2006 . 2007 2008 2009 . 2009 Total
I Federal Grants .. ~O
State Grants 0'"
State-Aid 0
I County 221,025 c ..
, c' 221,025
Other / City "'.. 0
Other " ,
0
I Other / MnDOT , -C,' 0
, '.,.,c...c ,'.. ,,'.
Total 0 221,025 0 0 . 0 0 O' 221,025
I ,
Prior To . '. Beyond
"
"
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 . 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Desil!n - Staff 0
Desi2n - Consultant 0
Ril!ht-of-Wav - Staff , 0
I Ril!ht-of-Wav - Consultant 2,625 2,625
Ri!!ht-of- W av 10,500 10,500
Construction - Staff 0
I Construction - Consultant 16,800 16,800
Construction 191,100 191,100
0
I Total 0 221,025 0 0 0 0 0 221,025
I
I CSAH 2 @TH13
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Railroad Crossing Improvements Location Map
I Project Number: 70-617-0XX ./?:\,
II \
1'-. \ \ ... '.
Location: CSAH 17 and V.P. Railroad Crossing ,p.a ~) 3:: \\ "
-'--~-0'~;l ,.,_ \\_//
I Shakopee \l\~ -....c. ,.~..
~...::::~ y/ ' 10~j~'; -=
~' 'r
:::3: \
Description: Install Crossing Arms . ,;~v~
I Purpose & Justification:
I This project will improve the safety of this f "'11 Vi \' ~ -- ~ '
at grade railroad crossing. I " ~0Kg: 11;1 1'- "~
k" GJ ;1 I.-=-=t
.,c.OR ~ _ 7 i r-:\ ..&-...
I
I ,
Prior To Beyond
Project Financing: zoos 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Federal Grants 122,625 122,6-25
State Grants . I. ' . 0
State-Aid , .. 0
I Countv " " 14,000 ,.' 13,625 " 27,625
Other I City , .' 0
Other ' . 0
, " . .
I Other " " ", ", 0
" ' .,'.. ,',. " ' .
Total' C" ',' ' ..' 14,000 , "., 136,250 0 0 0 0 0 150,250
I '. " " "- ' , ,.,.,
Priot-To Beyond
Project'Expenditures: ,., ." . 2005 2005 2006 2001 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Desi2n - Staff 0
Desil!n - Consultant 14,000 14,000
Ri2ht-of-Wav - Staff 0
I Ri2ht-of-Way - Consultant 0
Ril!ht-of-Wav 0
Construction - Staff 0
I Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 136,250 136,250
I Total 14,000 136,250 0 0 0 0 0 150,250
I
I CSAH 17 RR X-iog
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
,
I Project Title: Intersection Improvements Location Map
CSAH 37@TH 19
~ ,. , ,~" ;:
Project Number: .Lr~:-. .,: 15 S 0
I w
'"
,- --- ",' i\ ~,.,~ ~ S
- _ ~_ 8 I 27Ol~, ST,
Location: CSAH 37 @TH 19, New Prague VI
I ~E, ) \
Description: Signal Installation and associated :i 15 ,r:0 1-\ s
~
w ~' ~ c<,,~
Intersection improvements. :r
~- 'J -- I T; tL r-;
I ,- ~I ~(37) r-- ~ i 89
Purpose & Justification: h\ HJ II J:.-L- ~ ST. W,
A signal installation at this intersection has been ~]jJnr\; i ~ J ~/
I warranted and MnDOT has programmed its
installation in 2005. ~(0)
I
I I "j r
I 1 1
I 1
I Prior To Beyond
,
Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009. 2009 Total
I Federal Grants , ' ... I" o _
State Grants , 0
,.'., .
State-Aid , .. 0
I County 150,000 " " 150,000
Other I City , . 0
Other' 0
I Other I MnDOT I City 1,170,000 , 1,170,000
, " .'
. Total . o 1,320,000 0 0 o ,. 0 0 1,320,000
I ., ...', . ,
Prior To Beyond ',' ,
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006, 2007 ...2008 ., .2009, 2009 . . Total
I Desil!n - Staff " ,,' 0
Design - Consultant 0
Ril!ht-of-Wav - Staff . 0
I Ril!ht-of-Wav - Consultant 0
Ril!ht-of-Wav 0
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 10,000 10,000
Construction 1,310,000 1,310,000
I Total o 1,320,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,320,000
I
I CSAH 37@TH 19
I,
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: CSAH 42 Segment 8 Implementation Location Map
I Project Number: 70-642-XXX
~ ~""_ .c., __~?'C""..v r ,."~ ..
, '",... 27,' ,". :.H" '<.:: ~
Location: CSAH 42 between Huntington
and Glendale .' ',. ". ....-.... ? ~,.
I /I' ",',.,: r::::.,:::<':'::.'
l-"
Description: Improve Access via frontage roads " \~ . - .. .
:'--J . , . '
":' :'" i
signal modifications ...... ",,;: '.' '.' '," i:~>J, ,.
.... . ; . ...~ . .... \\,..::;. "\
I Purpose & Justification:
I Project is a direct result of the CSAH 42 Corridor Study
and will improve the operation of CSAH 42, reducing
congestion and providing safer access.
I
I ,
" Prior To ' .' , < , Beyond
Project Financing: 2.0.05 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2.0.09 Total
I Federal Grants 0
State Grants 0
State-Aid , 0
I .. ,
Countv 694,670 ',' 694,670
Other / City .' 694,670 . 694,670
. -,-
Other . 0
I Other ' , 0
,... ~ .. 'H
, '"
Total ..., .. 01,389,340 ..'. ," '0' ..' .,", o ',,' . 0 ' 0 0 1,389,340
I ",
PriorTo I.. -." Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2.0.05 2005 2006 I .20.07 2.0.08 2.0.09 2.0.09 Total
I Design - Staff 0
Design - Consultant 66,300 66,300
Right-of-Wav- Staff 0
1 Right-of-Way - Consultant 55,000 55.000
Right-of-Way 552,000 552,000
Construction - Staff 0
I' Construction - Consultant 53,040 , .. . 53,040
Construction 663,000 663,000
I Total o 1,389,340 0 0 0 0 o ,1,389,340
I
I CSAH 42 Segment 8
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Belle Plaine Interchange I location Map
I Project Number: CP 64-XX ~---,.- ="/' /f,~;--1~~ ~ ~\ 31 \~ --..
\ 'I f;\\,.,~) 3.
.. '" ' .~ Ju );~'\~-- _.~'"
"\.' /S...~ 36 ~.
Location: TH 169@TH25/CR64b::I' - d~.~ _.,"" ",. 169
I ~'(el e, ... 25 "
I~ ", Q
D .. C t t t . t h -' 6' .~
escnption: ons ruc sys em In erc ange j:?I.a!n~ ~:.1: F~' "6 II "25 'n
I ... Gl: ff
:J L" ", .' ,"[:J-;-6~l0 '7'
Purpose & Justification: ' ./Vl!" ,::/:--- ~ c,:;:
I Safety improvement to replace at-grade crossing. . tft, I.;, 12/, ,'i..l...3 ., ',':',r,.0:' ,:~! I
<, i;,.,),..h ,~~1<~r~f ,,'J; .,', ,.1;
( LjJ(~::;;< '0,01'1:' .
I vKf1'... ','.. .,:O' ";~:">':"''':'
~._..,....,.._... ." . ">,'" .:..-,
~ . ::.:' ,.:. ".onis.Fw.... .... ~ ,_m .
I NOTE: Finan, cing exceeds construction
cost due to bonding.
.
. Prior To Beyond
I Project Financing: 200S 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 "" ,Total.
Federal Grants 0
I.~~ 0
State-Aid., " 0
Countv,1,100,OOO 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 270,000.. 1,730,000
I Other/MnDOT- -19,000,000 19,000,000
.. Other! City :, 100,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 270,000 730.000
Other.," ," " 0
'" '
I . ",Total ,.', 0 1,200,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 19,540,O~O. ~1,460,OOO ."
.,
>1" ,,' . ' - Prior To Beyond i '
'Project Expenditures: 200S' , 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Desien - Staff 0
I . Desi!!n - Consultant 0
Rieht-of-Wav - Staff 0
Rieht-of-Way - Consultant 0
I Rieht-or-Way 0
Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
I Construction 20,000,000 20,000,000
Total 0 2Q,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 20,000,000
I ".
I TH 169 Interchange
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Intersection Improvements Location Map
I Project Number: CP 2007-66-XX !~: ~ X" .d'l 21~J ~
! -' . i';!. oCK
--^, ' : '.....ST.w. ..#' ,. ". 282 r:+'"'+'"'' UseR ff "
~ ~~ ~ DA""S1~~"'u.-~ (~'"19'<'.~:~~t:...: "~-.;"M. ,09-'-20 ;
Location: CR 66 @ TH 2l/Hillside ~ J d- ,ot) "--n '
" or an ,>''''''<' i" ::h '; _ ' I
I "ACORNWAY .....,,~I".A.:~~ -',' .r I ,
I .~ ''''''~~f \. ~"" t-".:>.: AAAB~ 'Q~ : 2001
Description: Realign/consolidate intersections with -, . m. L""',""K~:OF~ ~:~-L'J'"
I "." . ~""' OR
TH21 : ~ I ,n~-;.,' ~. i,#r" \;; ~ VALU::O. ~
I ~ lS ... \,>~"-~ ~i ,-<?'~~
I I ,~ I, l\ , ""OAR VAtldY
,- , ~;
Purpose & Justification: I ....::' '" ' '!). "',,' " 'S<"'~:5
I. ~ ." 'I " ~ ' g
I ~ ~ I 2101hST.W.' . "p z
I -;- 0 --------" ----------~~---- -- s.~
City will take the lead on a cooperative agreement project R~NCE ~> ' '"': I
2141;1'o$1'IV . 'ti .......!' .
with MnDOT /County cost participation.
I (City did not request this, but should be county staff
recommendation. )
. .
I Prior To c-:- ., Beyond .'
Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 .: 2008 2009 2009 Total
I 2007 :
Federal Grants .0
State Grants " 0
State-Aid ! .0
I Countv i 361,570 " 361,570
Other I Citv I ., - ' d 0
,
Other '" ," 0
I , !.
Other '.' . 0
d
:.', -, "
I Total 0 361,570 0 c- 0 0 0 O' -0 361,570
", .
Prior To ... ' .:. I . ,. .." Beyond-
, , - -- -
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 ". 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Deshm - Staff 0
Desifm - Consultant 36,157 36,157
I Ri1!ht-of- W ay - Staff ,. 0
Ri~ht-of-Wav - Consultant 0
Ri1!ht-of-Wav 0
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 24,105 24,105
Construction 301,308 301,308
I Total ' 0 361,570 0 0 0 0 0 361,570
I
I CR 66@TH 21
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Intersection Lighting Location Map
,I Project Number: XXX
Countywide Locations -;..... .-..-...,''"'
Location: County-wide
I
Description: Install intersection streetlights on
I breakaway poles
Purpose & Justification:
I Install street lights on breakaway poles at intersections where
utility poles do not currently exist or cannot properly
accommodate intersection lighting needs. This will be dom
I only where intersections meet the County's streetlighting
warrants.
I c
,
, Prior To Beyond
I Project Financing: 2005 2005 ,2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Federal {;rants . . ' 0
I State Grants 0
State-Aid .- .,,'. ',"', ..: 0
County ~ ' ,,' 40,000 40,000
, , " i
I Other ICity . ,'. - " . ., , 0
Other -- --0 - ,,- " 0
Other . ,".. " - , 0
,'~ , '
I - ,.'. .., ,'... ", f., '-'" ,-
Total " , 0 ,40,000 ", , . 0 0 0 0 0 40,000
I -.,. ~ ~""" ~.'~ Prior To Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Desi!!n - Staff 0
I Desi!!n - Consultant . 0
Ri2ht-of-Wav - Staff 0
Right-of-Wav - Consultant 0
I Ri!!ht-of-Wav 0
Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
I Construction 40,000 40,000
Total 0 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 40,000
I
I Intersection lighting
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Unspecified Construction Location Map
I Project Number:
-- ., ....-.....
, ,., '. ol....~::r-'
Location: Countywide Countywide Locations
I
Description: Contingency for spot safety, traffic
I signals, and construction contingency.
I Purpose & Justification:
Annually, needs arise that require the County to respond
I to issues on the highway system and this funding enables
the County to do so. Additionally, there is a need to
budget for construction contingencies such as changes
I (Supplemental Agreements) and overruns of quantities.
Prior To ,,,. .' ,." Beyond . c, e_
I Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Federal Grants 0
State Grants " , 0
"1 State-Aid -c 0
County 665,000 " 665,000 -
,- ,
Other/City .. " " 0
Other " ," , 0
1- Other , 0
, , . -;:;c ~.
..-
, "Total 0 665,000 0 0 0 .,., 0 0 665,000 ! "
I " ,
Prior To ,- , Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005 200S 2006 2007 2008 ,2009. 2009 Total
I Desi2n - Staff 0
Desi2n - Consultant 0
Ri2ht-of-Way - Staff 0
I Ri2ht-of-Way - Consultant 0
Ri2ht-of-Wav 0
Construction - Staff 0
I Construction - Consultant '" 0
Construction 665,000 665,000
I Total 0 665,000 0 0 0 0 0 665,000
I
I 05 Unspecified
I
I Scott County Highway Department
I 2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: 17th A venue Extension Location Map
(Future CSAH 16) _..~~; ""/::'::,::.',-,' ir~: "r',~
I Project Number: 70-616-XXX
1'1 ~:,...,,~ " C),l:' , , ,"',"
~. ~ u . ",' '.):fn:n~
Location: Future CSAH 16 from CSAH l5 to CR 79 ""isr ~ :,[1 r:~'~, :,:"::-":~ ,~~.,.~:x., L~!:j0,i',:J-.;')."j:~;::!;
I 7~/':'>'" .'..:;:;':~';')I~~y ,;"<' ,...'"...,
, ,.....'.. "
Description: Construct new 4 lane divided highway 69'- 6~ :..~"":' "i(:!?:"::;';-::ii~ijl
~. ~ "" "", ,'C"',, ", " "
, " ", ::,..,;, ,"
--~ ~. " ,", ,<:,'~" ":, "
I . ~'. r -.., , ,.,., ;2:)1; . .
'~- C\::<?;::~: ..
9 ".:' ~ '.
6 .,. > ___.
251h : '. 77 oC(
Purpose & Justification: sr w .' -,...' <6~( 'D i~~q ':,' ;,'
I Implementation of City and County agreement for :' i "u ~ "8TH,! I~:~:':;"? ,.1""'"
130TH STW ~ ~3 ~~~'~'; ..~.I'I>.
swap of current CSAH 16 for 17th A venue, which . .j\\l.. 130", ST. w, ,:'~ fi},;";i; .
better supports the local and regional highway system. !<L ;~~~~SS".:~~ONDR w '",~.:,::.,:" ~I':'<"~ '
- OAK CI~~ 3. SOUTH SHANNON DR ~ '. ......: ,:E: . ,
I :t " I,S:::: "
OAK RO.J ROSEWOOD ;:. '. e . ,,:...
. Ii /. . ---! CIR, ~ ...... ~ f! ' .. ',', '."""_ ',.".:..,..:: ..,..
Prior To Beyond
I Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Federal Grants 0
State Grants " - .. ,',', - - 0
I State-Aid 0
County 350,000 350,000 350,000 1,050,000
-
Other I City 0
I Other " 0
Other :' ," .' 0
"
,:C ',-
I .'
Total 0 350,000 350,000 350,000 0 0 o 1,050,000
",' .",' .", ' ." , ,
I " PriorTo_ '," ,,' ...- .. Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005 ",200S ," 2006 ' 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
~ -;c" 0
Desie:n - Staff
I Desi!!n - Consultant ., ". ... ..:..' '.,:,...' . 0
Ri!!ht-of-Way - Staff .. , :, 0
Ri2ht-of-Way - Consultant 0
I Ri2ht-of-Way 0
Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
I Construction 1,050,000 1,050,000
..
Total 0 1,050,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,050,000
I
I
I Future CSAH 16
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORT A TION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Construct CSAH 2 Location Map
I Project Number: SAP 70-602-15 u l-~ V SOO1HEm~~~
!;( LN 24'R
Z
SOUT~N .~ "-,~
~,..,. .",~ ',,'~- OCA:~ g
CSAH 2 between CSAH 91 and 135 o <J 'l5! 2SOth oJ
Location: ... ' f-
I in New Market Township and Elko (1.8 miles). - <;T,___ ~_/
EW MARKET ........
22 23
I Description: Construct 4 lane divided highway. ~ - - - 41 fil ~
liS J 0-
X J~ is
~h S1. E \\
I Purpose & Justification: - :", tl ill3 ~ '/
-. ,....,.. Elko! ,
.: !!! '~ /..'.:... f ~
Upgrade the capacity and roadway to current f!l! <( 27 f'''---i ' I 26
__.i<C --I ~ -'T"-; , C) "l '-~ ~
standards. This will minimize traffic flow problems and I ~ ,,'.............,-1
I f u. C1 ..'
enhance safety. This project will position CSAH 2 for .--- '-' ' I ~
.~. ( ~ . -
tii 270tn I 51", E. f-,.E!
expected development in the area and the susequent traffic ) : 1_\ 8
I increases. 111 I iE "
~ ---1 d 27'3RD ST. E. ~-
I 35_ I"
.- $1 .
- -,--c Prior To Beyond
, . .,
I Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Federal Grants , o "
State Grants - o I~'
I State-Aid 2.700,000 2,700,000
County . " . 80,000 5,580,000 5,660,000
Other! City ,,', ,.' 220,000 220,000
I Other " " 0
Other' '. 0
, ,,' . -
" - . ".',' " [.. , . ,,'
I Total " 80,000 8,500,000 0 0 0 0 o 8,580,000
,.- . ,.,
Prior To Beyond
I . Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009. ..', Total
-
Design - Staff . o .
Design - Consultant 80,000 80,000
I Right-of-Way - Staff 0
Right-of-Way - Consultant 0
Right-of-Way 3,000,000 3,000,000
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant '0
Construction 5,500,000 5,500,000
I ,
Total 80,000 8,500,000 0 0 0 o , o 8,580,000
I
I CSAH 2 East
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2006 FINAL DRAFT
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORT A TION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Total
Road Type of Project Other County Anticipated
No. Location Length Construction Cost Costs Costs Revenue
Levy 6,354,000
State-Aid 3,300,000
Belle Plaine Payment 90,000
of
PRESERVATION ,)
.. County-Wide 10.QO Overlay/CIR 2,000,000 2,OOo,oOb
MANAGEMENT
.. Unspecified .. Traffic Signals/Spot Safety/Contingency 805,000 750,000
EXPANSION
16 CH 15 to CH 79 (17th Avenue) 1 4 Lane divided 350,000 350,000
82 CSAH 21 to CSAH 17 ,2.59 'Reconstruct - 4 Lane Divided' 16,846,000 7,200,000 9,646,000
20,001,000 7,200,000 12,746,OPO 9,744,000
}1
J
ASSUMPTIONS:
5% Annual Inflation
$100K annual State-Aid Increase
2.5% Annual Levy Increase
2006
I
ScottCounty Highway Department
I 2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: 2006 Overlays Location Map
.,I"~ Project Numbe~" ~.-:.:
Location: Various - Countywide Countywide Locations
I
I, Description: Bitumino~s Overlays for pavement
preservatIOn
I Purpose & Justification:
As part of an overall pavement preservation program
I' overlays ate needed on a regular basis to' preserve
the initial paving investment.
I
.
Prior To Beyond
'I Project Financing: 2005, 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 T.otal ;.
Federal Grants 0
State Grants 0
I State-Aid 0
County .,' , ,. 2,000,000 2,000,000
Other / City ,',' 0
I Other. .. " 0
Other .' . 0
Total .-.. 0 02,000.000 0 0 . 0 0 2,000,000
I ,,' PriorTo Beyond
, Project Expenditures: .,' 2005. 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I D~p-~ff 0
Design - Consultant 0
Right-of-Way - Staff 0
I Right-of-Way - Consultant 0
Right-of-Way 0
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant ' . ",.. 0
Construction 2,000,000 2,000,000
I Total 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 2,000,000
I
I 06 Overlays
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Unspecified Construction Location Map
I Project Number:
4;[:'. ,,"~~::;.' ",
Location: Countywide Countywide Locations
I
I Description: Contingency for spot safety, traffic
signals, and construction contingency.
I Purpose & Justification: -
Annually, needs arise that require the County to respond
I to issues on the highway system and this funding enables
the County to do so. Additionally, there is a need to
I budget for construction contingencies such as changes
(Supplemental Agreements) and overruns of quantities.
,
Prior To Beyond
I Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total -
Federal Grants 0
State Grants 0
I State-Aid .. 0
County 805,000 805,000 .
Other I City .. , 0
I Other . 0
Other . 0
,O'
,
" Total' .., , 0 0 805,000 0 0 ....,.-- 0 0 805,000
I
, Prior To " -..--c- Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 . ' 2009 2009 Total
I Design - Staff 0
Design - Consultant 0
I Ri~ht-of-Way - Staff .. 0
Ri2ht-of-Way - Consultant 0
Ri2ht-of-Way 0
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 805,000 805,000
I Total 0 0 805,000 0 0 0 0 805.000
I
I 06 Unspecified
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Upgrade CSAH 82 Location Map
I Project Number: SAP 70-682-001
'1"":' ~;.
,. __4"n:.", : " 'If'" "';/~ ., .:, If. CARfUAGE H~l
)___J' '~~!:: ....... . ~ l,,~~
Location: On CSAH 82 from CSAH 17 to
I CSAH 21.
, : ~j! ..: .,.,'....c\."V
, '- 83. '",' .... "''\.. ." _-~/I,)
I Description: Upgrade CSAH 82 to a 4-lane ~ .r ,.,.".,s4,..si,;~..,( /7'
divided roadway. 17) (d.. 'It> ' " "5........', ,::',-'1 -
or I \ "'~ /\'" L>)'~'~
I ~:::'--~~_..~:-~~-f?: lfl~,
I Purpose & Justification:
j- R, \ '-.J"" ,..,~.
Purpose is to increase the safety and capacity ? -McC"'~CT ~, c-/~:.~ ..) ..- /~!:..:_~.:,..: ;" r./ /.....
I of CSAH 82.
I
Prior'ro .-- - " ," .. Beyond
I Project Financing: 2005 " 2005 ' 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Federal Grants , 0''-
State Grants .,... 0
I State-Aid 0
County 600,000 850,000 8,196,000 9,646,000
Other I City . ,,'., 5,400,000 , '. 5,400,000
I Other , 0
Other . ,',",......... ..1,800;000 " . 1,800,000
. . , , '., " . .
I Total 600,000 850,000 15,396,000 0 " " .0 " 0 0 16,846,000
, ". .,'... '... . "".' ,..,.', '.,..
Prior To " , '. " Beyond
I Project Expenditures: 2005 2005; .2.006 ' 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Design - Staff 0
Design - Consultant 600,000 600,000
I Right-or-Way - Staff 0
Right-of-Wav - Consultant 0
Right-of- W av 850,000 850,000
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 960,000 960,000
Construction 14,436,000 " 14,436,000
I ,
Total 600,000 850,000 15,396,000 0 0 0 o 16,846,000
I
I CSAH 82
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
)
2007 FINAL DRAFT
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Total
Road Type of Project Other County Anticipated
No. Location Length Construction Cost Costs Costs Revenue
,
Levy , 5,709,000
State-Aid 3,400,000
Belte Plaine Payment 90,000
PRESERVATION
.. County-Wide 10.00 Overlay/erR 2,000,000 2,000,000
23 Cedar Lake Twp - County Ditch #2 . 0.10 Bridge Replacement. L3960 327,750 204,750 123,000
MANAGEMENT
-. Unspecified -- Traffic Signals/S'pot Safety/Contingency 862,750 862,750
EXPANSION
16 CH 15 to CH 79 (17th Avenue) 1 4 Lane divided 350,000 350,000
42 Huntington. Glendale (Segment 8) 1.00 Corridor Improvements 2,980,000 300,000 2,680,000
6,520,500 504,750 6,015,750 9,199,000
ASSUMPTIONS:
5% Annual Inflation
$100K annual State-Aid Increase
2.5% Annual Levy Increase
'" 2007
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: 2007 Overlays Location Map
I Project Number:
, ,~.'.
Location: Various - Countywide Countywide Locations
I
Description: Bituminous Overlays for pavement
I preservation
I Purpose & Justification:
As part of an overall pavement preservation program
I overlays ,are needed on a regular basis to preserve
the initial paving investment.
I
Prior To Beyond
I Project Financing: 200S 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 .2009 Total
Federal Grants , 0
State Grants 0
I State-Aid 0
County 2,000,000 - 2,000,000
Other / City 0
Other , '.. -. 0
1- Other 0
Total 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 b 0 2,000;000
I Prior To - 'C, - Beyond'
Project Expenditures: 200S 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Design - Staff 0
Desi2n - Consultant 0
Right-of-Way - Staff '- 0
I Right-of-Wav - Consultant 0
Right-of-Way 0
Construction - Staff 0
I Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 2,000,000 2,000,000
I Total 0 0 o 2,000,000 0 0 0 2,000,000
I
I 07 Overlays
I
Scott County Highway Department
I 2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Replace Bridge #L3960 location Map
~ ~ ~ iii It! ~ I I
~ Project Number: 70-623-008 ~ ''''ST~'', II<> "",: <9. 2'3<'sT,', 1 , '",
I L t' CSAH23 h fCSAH8 "'- ~~ ~
oca .on: sout 0 ;. ""'" ,,' sT -'". is < B "{if..
~""~i
~ .;to$'
I ~ _",tjj @o' --~ ' , ~:'" :7
_.... ....' L3'lS((.... ~ c Ct : ~~.-
Description: Replace Bridge #L3960 (culvert) . ~p e..SAC"', 23 '.. ..,-" , ,~
I (2301. ST,./'-..." : ~
~r- ~ ~
~ . ~ ~
. ~ ... ~ r;ocKl=ltDGE .0 sr. Eo >.
Purpose & Justification: CT --,r ",,,. ,~, ~ ,', .
I~~. .
I Replace a structurally deficient culvert (bridge). :4 ,", j vi,'" ""I_
I
I Prior To Beyond
'. ., . " .
Project Financing: '2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Federal Grants ' C
State Grants _, 204,750 204,750 .
State-i\id 0
I County ..,' 500 " 17,500 105,000 123,000
Other I City ,."." 0
Other '. " '., ,
I Other .,.'. -.' '. '.
Total ,.', ,500' 0 17,500 ',' 309;750 0 0 0 327,750
I . , ' ,,' Prior To" . " Beyond
Project Expenditures: . 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Design - Staff 0
Design - Consultant 500 500
Ri2ht-of-Wav - Staff ' 0
I Ri2ht-of-Wav - Consultant 2,500 2,500
Right-of-Wav 15,000 15,000
Construction - Staff 0
I Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 309,750 309,750
I Total 500 0 17,500 309,750 0 0 0 327,750
I
I L3960{CSAH 23)
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Unspecified Construction Location Map
I Project Number:
~ ,
Location: Countywide Countywide Locations
I
I Description: Contingency for spot safety, traffic
signals, and construction contingency.
I Purpose & Justification:
Annually, needs arise that require the County to respond
I to issues on the highway system and this funding enables
the County to do so; Additionally, there is a need to
budget for construction contingencies such as changes
I (Supplemental Agreements) and overruns of quantities.
Prior To .. Beyond
.1.. Project Financing: 2005 ' 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Federal Grants 0
State Grants - c'. _'~ ' - 0
I State-Aid - 0
County 862,750 .. ' 862,750
Other I City 0
1- Other 0
Other .. , 0
: " . ~ . '
- -.--. , " ,.' Tota!.', . 0 0 0 862,750 0 0 0 862,750
I . Prior To '. ' ,,-. ',.' " '."
Beyond I
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 . Total
I Desi2n - Staff 0
Desi2n - Consultant 0
Ri2ht-of-Wav - Staff 0
I Ri2ht-of-Wav - Consultant 0
Rh!ht-of-Wav 0
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant - .. 0
Construction 862,750 862,750
I Total 0 0 0 862,750 0 0 0 862,750
I
I 07 Unspecified
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Upgrade CSAH 42 to a 6 lane highway. Location Map
I Project Number: 70-642-XXX [T~~':' ;.\\~.'1
..,'-.::.-
Location: Huntington to Glendale
I '.1 ; . ,;; .: i. M .~... : .'.:~, i
Description: Add one through lane in each direction. G,,,~. ,'-,';':"f)~,:,l
I Purpose & Justification:
Frj ':i:, '" "., I
I Provide additional capacity for CSAH 42 in this segment .j, J/<"':~>:' "',,' '_,.>:,)'.~:~~'::",;.;:"P,!
Reduce congestion
I
I Prior To Beyond
Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 .. 2009 2009 Total
I Federal Grants 0
State Grants ' , .. .. 0
I State-Aid , ~ 0
County 180,000 1,000,000 1 ;500,000 .. 2,680,000
Other I City " 300,000. 300,000
" '
Other , , ,..
I 0
Other ,,' .. .- 0
. " - " .. "
I Total ','_" 0 I', 180,000 1,000,000 1,800,000 0 " 0 o 2,980,000
" ", ,,- ',' -' .' .... ,..- .',
Prior To Beyon,d
Project Expenditures: 20Q5.. 2005, , .. ..2006 ",,2007 2008 2009. 2009 Total
I Desi2D - Staff .' 0
Desi2:n - Consultant 180,000 180,000
Ri2ht-of-Wav - Staff ,
I . 0
Right-of-Wav - Consultant '" 0
Right-of-Way 1,000,000 1,000,000
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant , 0
Construction 1,800,000 , 1,800,000
I Total 0 180,000 1 ,000,000 1,800,000 0 0 o 2,980,000
I
I CSAH 42 Segment 8 - 6 lane
- - - - - - - ,- - - - - - - - - - - -
2008 FINAL DRAFT
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Total
Road , Type of Project Other County Anticipated
No. Location Length . . Construction Cost Costs Costs Revenue
Levy 6,784,000
State-Aid 3,500,000
Belle Plaine Payment 90,000
PRESERVATION
-- County-Wide 10.00. ,9verlay/CIR 2,000,000 2,000.000
MANAGEMENT
2 CSAH 27 TO NM Area Hall 1..47 Reconstruct. 2 & 3 Lane Segments 4,000,000 275,000 3,725,000
44 TH 13/Main Ave Intersection -- Intersection Improvements 100,000 100,000
86 CSAH 23 to CSAH 27 3.20 2 Lane Rural Reconstruction 3,000,000 2,332,500 667,500
-- Unspecified -- Traffic Signals/Spot Safety/Contingency 1,273,000 1.273,000
EXPANSION
21 CSAH 16to CSAH 18 1.40 4 Lane Divided 6,000,000 525,000 5,475,000
16,373,000 3,132,500 13,240,500 10,374,000
i'
ASSUMPTIONS:
5% Annual Inflation
$100K annual State-Aid Increase
2.5% Annual Levy Increase
2008
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORT A TION IMPROVEMENTS
I ,
Project Title: 2008 Overlays Location Map
I Project Number:
'- - ..'
~',:~
Location: Various - Countywide Countywide Locations
I
I Description: Bituminous Overlays for pavement
preservation
I Purpose & Justification:
As part of an overall pavement preservation program
I overlays are needed on a regular basis to preserve
the initial paving investment.
I
Prior To Beyond
_I Project Financing: 2005 ,2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 .. Total
Federal Grants 0
State Grants 0
I State-Aid 0
County 2,000,000 " - "" 2,000,000
Other I City '. , 0
I Other 0
Other .. , - 0
.
Total 0 0 0 o 2,000,000 0 0 2,000,000
I '. Prior To " , ,," ---, Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 .. 2008 ,,2009 2009 Total
I Design - Staff 0
Desi2n - Consultant 0
Rh?:ht-of-Way - Staff 0
I Right-of-Way - Consultant I 0
Right-of-Way 0
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 2,000,000 2,000,000
I Total 0 0 0 o 2,000,000 0 o 2,000,000
I
I 08 Overlays
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Reconstruct CSAH 2 Location Map
... ) ~ \
z
I-- Project Number: SAP 70-602-014 ~
~<>
;,.'--' '-'- 1'-
Location: CSAH 2 between CSAH 27 and t NEW Mfl
I CSAH 91 in the CitylTownship of New Market 20 25 H ST. E.
!l!' 21
Description: Reconstruct existing 2-lane CSAH 2 to a 4; ~ -----------r
i ~"--..,
I 2/3/4-lane rural/urban highway !;! o ""M" 2
2 "l ~
.( j L..,- 't-I-~ew ';"'\ 91
Purpose & Justification: 27 ~ - -;, MarK~r-
I 29 . 28 I !l!
!li' [~ ~ ..-"'" "'--,
< .
To upgrade this sub-standard road segmentto current <: ~ 1__1
I standards and an urban section in downtown New Market. 'I
E. , .L ).
This will minimize traffic flow problems and enhance n. .~ ,
$~ ~ tlI I
safety. This project will position CSAH 2 for expected ~ ~ ~ ,\-OTA I
~ --
t- 4 r--- ~
I development in the area and the subsequent traffic
increases.
Prior To Beyond
I Project Financing: 200S 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Federal Grants 0'
State Grants 0
I State-Aid , - 2,700,000 2,700,000
County , 284,000 550;000 191,000 1,025,000
Other I City '. 275,000 275,000
I Other ". 0
,
Other " 0
.
" .'. . - - ,-.
.' , .
I Total , ' - .' 284, Q(}(} -" --. 0 ,,-', ,'. Q 55.0,000 3,166,000 0 0 4,000,000
~"-
_ Ppo.r T<<;l ~eyond
I Project Expenditures: 2~O5 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Design - Staff 0
I Design - Consultant 84,000 84,000
Right-of-Way - Staff 0
Right-of-Way - Consultant 0
I Right-of-Way 200,000 550,000 750,000
Construction - Staff - 0
Construction - Consultant 0
I Construction 3,166,000 3,166,000
Total 284,000 0 0 550,000 3,166,000 0 0 4,000,000
, "
I
I CSAH 2 West
I
I Scott County Highway Department
, 2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Revise TH 131 CSAH 441 Main Ave Location Map
Intersection.
I P. N b" 70 644 OXX' ,....".~<!llllll..l->"~".....- '" ,'g < D Vlf
rOJect urn er. - - 'r'-co..""'" e' %.. "",~~:>Ii
(21Y ~ '; , ',~ ~~PI
. -~ .,.", :", :\ ~h~l
I Location: T~13/CSAH44MainAve. :7, ->: ;', iiV~ ~~
PnorLake B2~~ ,,' : ' (iJ'~~ ~
I Description: Re-alig~ Main A v~ and. C~AH 44 . ,',"& 'rIP _ ..-1""-:) !.. "-m ;. ~
to provide a safer mtersectIon.,'" .;.",-)' .....~.:~'~ ~ ,~~is
I ".. ',' ~=t =>< ~ ~~q n ~ ~
Purpose & Justification: r*' 'R,~~' .. 21 !'''',,'~~~ tl.~.J
Revising the intersection to provide better sight .,at (-'- :.:-- 1--" , i I rBJ..it! Cl
I' lin.es and stac~ing will make it a safer ~ntersect~on. ~~~~. @ 'l>' L? ~Y~I ~F
Pnor LakeIMhDOT are the lead agencIes on thiS
project:
I ," County ,costs only.shown ,
Prior To Beyond I",
'I Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007' 2008 2009 2009 ..Total- "
'... Federal Grants. _ ' 0
...' State Grants . 0
'I' State-Aid .,' - 0
" " County 100,000 ", 1QO,000
OiliufC~' .
'I Other '
.' ' Other' 0 '
, ...' ,
I Total'. 0 0 0 0 100,000 0.. 0 .100,000
Prior To Beyond -- ,,-
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 .. 2009 Total
I D~p~~ff 0
Deshm - Consultant 0
Ri2ht-of- Way - Staff 0
I Right-of-Wav - Consultant 0
Ri2ht-of-Wav 0
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant '0 .
Construction 100,000 100,000
I Total 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 100,000
I
I CSAH 44 @ TH 13
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005- 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Reconstruct CSAH 86 Location Map
I Project Number: SAP 70-686-XX l/,,(,~ " ,.
~ ~
..--.:-~. " -..... - ~~5
Location: CSAH 86 between CSAH 23 and %1'a. Sf. e.
I CSAH 27 (3.20 miles) in Cedar Lake and New Market I I~~i ~
~ " "
Townships and Rice County ~\
<0 0
I Description: Reconstruct CSAH 86 " 86
'-' ~
I Purpose & Justification:
Purpose is to upgrade the 2-lane rural roadway to current
I standards and legal load-carrying capacity. This will "
enhance safety and rideability. This project is under the
direction of Rice County with both County's sharing
,I equally in the construction cost.
I"nor To .." - ,., Reyon~
Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Federal Grants 2,000;000 .._h.. . 2,000,000
State Grants . - . , 0
I State-Aid " 0
County m , 500,000 .. 500,000
Other I City . 0
I Other ., , 0
Other I Rice County . " . " 500,000 500,000
, , .
Total 0 .0 0 " o 3,000,000 . " o " o 3,000,000
I - "
,..' .. " .,,- '. ,',' . "
Prior To c- Beyond'
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 .2006 .. , .,2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Design - Staff - . 0
Design - Consultant 0
I Right-of-Way - Staff 0
Right-of-Way - Consultant 0
Right-of-Way 200,000 200,000
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 2,800,000 2,800,000
I Total 0 0 0 o 3,000,000 0 o 3,000,000
I
I CSAH 86
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Unspecified Construction Location Map
i
i
Project Number: )
I
_~''':':7 ;
Location: Countywide Countywide Locations
I
I Description: Contingency for spot safety, traffic
signals, and construction contingency.
I Purpose & Justification:
Annually, needs arise that require the County to respond
I to issues on the highway system and this funding enables
the County to do so. Additionally, there is a need to
budget for construction contingencies such as changes
I (Supplemental Agreements) and overruns of quantities.
~ '
Prior To Beyond -'
I Project Financing: , 200S 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total _
Federal Grants 0
State Grants 0
I State-Aid -, 0
County , -.. 1,273,000 ' 1,273,000
..',
Other I City ", .' 0
Other '.'" 0
I ,
Other 0
Total ,'.., -, - 0 " 0' 0 0 1,273,000 0 o 1,273,000
,
I ,
,
, ,-' ,- " '''-'.', "Prior To' Beyond ,
,
Project Expen.ditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Desi2n - Staff 0
Desi2n - Consultant 0
Rh!:ht-of-Wav - Staff , 0
I Ril!ht-of-Wav - Consultant 0
Ri2ht-of-Wav 0
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant .. I,' Q
Construction 1,273,000 1,273,000
I Total 0 0 0 0 1,273,000 0 o 1,273,000
I
I 08 Unspecified
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Construct new CSAH 21 Location Map
I Project Number: SAP 70-621-XX ~, 1l~\
--"~. ~~\, -",,-,
-- ;'~'r 169
Location: CSAH 21 between CSAH 16 and
CSAH 18 (1.50 miles) in Shako pee r -=:J 0" 0,
I - ~'L~ .~.
Description: Construct a 4-1ane CSAH 21 on new /~- . ~ .'
I alignment. ~ . D!~t\
~" - ,. .. ., -'
..... _. ~_ i ' '.[
Purpose & Justification: -, ' TV
'''~;.: I..>- '-"
I Initial project to construct a 4-lane roadway connecting ~,j' T . ~ ~
[1\-, I ~, ~~(\.
CSAH 21 at CSAH 42 with CSAH 18/Shakopee Bypass.
I This will provide additional capacity to the highway systerr ,.
in order to handle future traffic due to growth in this area.
I Prior To Beyond
..., " " - ".. ... ','
Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 ,2008 2009 2009 Total
1- Federal Grants 0
State Grants ,. ,0, ",_ ,'" -.-. o .
State-Aid 577 ,500 577,500
I County 215,000 399,000 1,312,500 2,971,000 4,897,500
Other! City 525,000 , ,,' -:-:- 525,000
Other " ~ ,
0
I Other ,," 0
,"
Total 215,000 0 399,000 1 ,312,500 4,073,500 0 .. ' 0 6,000,000
I ' ',n ' .".... " ' .. ,-, ~
Prior To Beyond ..
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007, .,. 2008 L-.2009~ ' ,_, 2009 Total
I Design - Staff .. 0
Design - Consultant 215,000 399,000 614,000
Right-of-Way - Staff 0
I Right-of-Way - Consultant 0
Right-of-Way 1,312,500 1,312,500
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 4,073,500 4,073,500
I Total 215,000 0 399,000 1,312,500 4,073,500 0 o 6,000,000
I
I CSAH 21(16 to 18)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2009 fl' FINAL DRAFT
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ;
I
Total
Road Type of Project Other County Anticipated
No. Location Length ' Construction Cost Costs Costs Revenue
Levy 7,859,000
State-Aid 3,600,000
Belle Plaine Payment 90,000
,;
PRESERVATION
-- County-Wide 2,000,000 2,000,000
MANAGEMENT
-. Unspecified .. Tr;3ffic,Sig'nals/Spot Safety/Conting13ncy 1,337,000 1,337,000
EXPANSION
21 CSAH 42 to CSAH 16 1.50 ALane Divided 6,300,000 525,000 5,775,000
9,637,000 525.000 9,112,000 11,549.000
ASSUMPTIONS:
5% Annual Inflation
$100K annual State-Aid Increase
2.5% Annual Levy Increase
2009
'l
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: 2009 Overlays Location Map
I Project Number:
" - -._- .{j'~;'
Location: Various - Countywide Countywide Locations
I
I, . Description: Bituminous Overlays for pavement
preservation
I Purpose & Justification:
As part of an overall pavement preservation program
I overlays are needed on a regular basis to preserve
the initial paving investment.
I
,'. '.
Prior To Beyond
I Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009, Total -.
Federal Grants 0
State Grants . 0
In State-Aid , 0
County- 2,000,000 2,000,000
Other I City , 0
I: Other 0
Other 0
- "
Total' " , 0 0 Q 0 o 2,000,000: ,', 0 2;000,000
I
.' . " Prior To . ,'.' Beyond
. ,. ,ON Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total '
I Design - Staff 0
Design - Consultant 0
I Rif!ht-of-Wav - Staff 0
Rif!ht-of-Wav - Consultant 0
Right-of-Way 0
I Construction - Staff 0
"
Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 2,000,000 2,000,000
I Total 0 0 0 0 o 2,000,000 0 2,000,000
I
I 09 Overlays
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Unspecified Construction Location Map
I Project Number:
.... ~._' ~r""'_'
Location: Countywide Countywide Locations
I
I Description: Contingency for spot safety, traffic
signals, and construction contingency.
I Purpose & Justification:
Annually, needs arise that require the County to respond
I to issues on the highway system and this funding enables
the County to do so. Additionally, there is a need to
budget for construction contingencies such as changes
I (Supplemental Agreements) and overruns of quantities.
Prior To Beyond
I Project Financing: ,2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 .. Total
Federal Grants 0
State Grants 0
I State-Aid 0
County , , ,.. 1,337,000 ' 1,337,000
Other I City , , 0
I Other 0
Other 0
Total 0 0 0 0 .. 0 1,337,000 0 1,337,000
I Prior To '" , .. .. " Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Desi2n - Staff 0
Design - Consultant 0
Right-of-Way - Staff , 0
I Right-of-Wav - Consultant 0
Right-of-Wav 0
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
Construction , 1,337,000 1,337,000
I Total 0 0 0 0 o 1,337,000 0 1,337,000
I
I 09 Unspecified
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Construct new CSAH 21 Location Map
Project Number: SAP 70-621-XX I IrI ~~
I ~"",. ~ ~
' ','" ",..' ~)
~~ . , .
..-r;~ ~ ~ )-,-~
Location: CSAH 21 between CSAH 16 and
x (I--: .-".
I CSAH 42 (1.50 miles) in Shakopee & t ..,~
Prior Lake ~ ,.>-,.....'...'i,. . ,I
......,.., ~:--+- i/'~
Description: Construct a 4-lane CSAH 21 on new _ . ~-:,::yf, I>-\~
I ' ",...--. ....b" \\-1, ~,
alignment. "w 'r"
.- , . 0 '
.:: . '.~' I~~. . .')~, -t--f"
., r= .. ..
/~3) ~ ~ _'~" . ~ ~ 0=::;;
, 'f . 18 .:>---:E
I Purpose & Justification: i _ .' '
i _ 4,tw , ~~T q;~ ()~;
1..- \ , ~
Final project to construct a 4-lane roadway connecting
I CSAH 21 at CSAH 42 withCSAH 18/ShakopeeBypass.
This will provide additional capacity to the highway systen:
in order to handle future traffic due to growth in this area.
I Final phase ofCSAH 21 construction.
Prior To Beyond
Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Federal Grants .. 0
State Grants .. 0
State~Aid 2,835,000 2,835,000
I County " 215,000 199,500 199,500 1,312,500 1,013,500 2,940,000
Other I City , 525,000 525,000
Other. '" ",," .. " 0
I Other .. , 0
.... .' ..,. ," ,- ., . ",'
Total ,... 2..15,000 o "", 199,500 199,500 1 ,312,500 4,373,500 o 6,300,000
.. " .
I ' ,,'
Prior To , Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I })esign '"'Staff .. 0
Design - Consultant 215,000 199,500 199,500 614,000
Right-of-Way - Staff ' - 0
I Ril!:ht-of-Way - Consultant 0
Right-of-Way 1,312,500 1,312,500
Construction - Staff 0
I Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 4,373,500 4,373,500
I Total 215,000 0 199,500 199,500 1,312,500 4,373,500 o 6.300,000
I
I CSAH 21 (16 to 42)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2010 FINAL DRAFT
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Total
Road Type of Project Other County Anticipated
No. Location length Construction Cost Costs Costs Revenue
levy 8,934,000
State-Aid 3,700,000
Belle Plaine Payment 90,000
PRESERVATION
-- County-Wide 10,00 Overlay/CIR 2,000,000 2,000,000
MANAGEMENT
12 CSAH 17 to TH 13 2.50 Reconstruct - 2 Lane Urban 7,425,000 1,160,000 6,265,000
-- Unspecified -. Traffic Signals/Spot Safety/Contingency 1,404,000 1,404,0090, '.
EXPANSION
27 CSAH 44 to 0.30 Mi North 0.30 Reconstruct - 4 Lane Divided 2,975,000 586,000 2,389,000.
44 Prior Lake CL - CSAH 27 1.00 Reconstruct - 4 Lane Divided 3.166,500 542,000 2,624,500:~
16,970,500 2,288.000 14,682,500'. 12,724,000
J
ASSUMPTIONS:
5% Annual Inflation
$100K annual State-Aid Increase
2.5% Annual Levy Increase
2010
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: 2010 Overlays Location Map
I Project Number:
_..~..-.
Location: Various - Countywide Countywide Locations
I
I Description: Bituminous Overlays for pavement
preservation
I Purpose & Justification:
As part of an overall pavement preservation program
I overlays are needed on a regular basis to preserve
the initial paving investment.
I
Prior To Beyond
I Project Financing: 200S 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Federal Grants 0"
State Grants , 0
I State-Aid 0
County 2,000,000 2,000,000
Other I City , 0
Other , 0
I Other 0
Total 0 0 0.". 0 0 , 0 2,000,000 2,000,000
I Prior To Beyond
Project Expenditures: 200S 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Desi2n - Staff 0
Desi2n - Consultant 0
Ri2ht-of-Wav - Staff 0
I Ri2ht-of-Way - Consultant 0
Ri2ht-of-Wav 0
Construction - Staff 0
I Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 2,000,000 2,000,000
I Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 2,000,000
I
I 2010 Overlays
I
Scott County Highway Department
I 2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Construct CSAH 12 Location Map
I Project Number: SAP 70-612-XX 17)(2., ~'1-~" ' r-. /',,),< . ~~~~),-,,~,
~a~7 ,~ / \ f(~U{
Location: CSAH 12 between CSAH 17 and TH 13 ':;k,' .~.~~ ... fft~.
I (2.30 miles) in Spring Lake Township and Prior Lake. g -;'6'$lST.., Q r <:1'~ PrtorLake ,-
~ ci 5 Ul ~ 81 ~ ~ f~( \
Description: Reconstruct CSAH 12 to a 2-lane rural in ~ ~ J i.5 iz; 1 · ~... ~:::':.0 _~:
I the undeveloped area and a 2.1ane urban in the residential ...; - \ ',,;L...r..(_ cJ;,.L<;~.o t ,~
12}a"OREtINEBLVD, -rf--''', , r"T"i ;-.....j
area. Developing alternate alignments and possible - <#'. '\."\ ,.' -; ,{ ....
'urisdictional chang~s in cooperation ~ith property ownersl \jj~( Spnng Lake ORe- \.., ~~)LL/' ~ f~~
I developers, Three River Parks and Pnor Lake. ~ 1/ <i.r~~. ~.. ~~,... 13 ~ ~
cd- ~~, ,.,.'" ,,"Ih .0 0 'I.lg~~
~lo>e~/ Sf E, 8
Purpose & Justification: ~VIEWr:;~-=11}o; 9 O~O~"'>/ MAPLe I~
I r ' ~~ 1.Ati'i'~.... ~ ~ I~
Purpose is to restore the structural int,egrity of the roadway, ;~ ,:Iltni3!,\fiST.eo s:eo J ~ :5 li!~V
. ., ilJ ,,::> Ill' -,~ '<: ~ STE ~
provide adequate st~rmwater dramage and mcrease 17 1'6 . ~ i;, :S ~ J ~ ~ if"
I the safety and capacity of the road.
"PrIOr To Beyond
Project Financing: 2005 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009,., Total
I Federal Grants , , 0
. . 0 State Grants, 0 .
State-Aid 2,150,0002,150,000 I'
I County 325,000 200,000 3,590,000 4,115,000
Other I City 1,160,000 1,160,000
Other 0
I O~ _0
Total .325,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 6,900,000 7,425,000
I ,,'
" '
,. ," Prior To Beyond.""
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I,',' , Design - Staff 0
Design - Consultant 325,000 100,000 425,000
Right-of-Way - Staff 0
I Right-of-Way - Consultant 0
Right-of-Way 100,000 100,000 200,000
Construction - Staff 0
I Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 6,800.000 6,-800,000
I Total 329,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 6,900,000 7,425,000
I
II CSAH12
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Unspecified Construction Location Map
I Project Number:
, - ".,,~..
Location: Countywide Countywide Locations
I
I Description: Contingency for spot safety, traffic
signals, and construction contingency.
I Purpose & Justification:
Annually, needs arise that require the County to respond
I to issues on the highway system and this funding enables c ;
the County to do so. Additionally, there is a need to
budget for construction contingencies such as changes
I (Supplemental Agreements) and overruns of quantities.
Prior To Beyond
I Project Financing: 2005 ,2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Federal Grants , 0
State Grants 0
I. State-Aid . 0
County 1404000 1,404,000
Other I City 0
Other " 0
I Other .. 0
" "
, Total , 0 0 0 0 .. 0 .0 1,404,000 1,404,000
I "
Prior To Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
.1 Desil!n - Staff , 0
Desil!n - Consultant , 0
Rh!ht-of-Wav - Staff 0
I Rh!ht-of-Wav - Consultant 0
Right-of- Way 0
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 1,404,000 1,404,000
I Total 0 0 0 0 0 o 1,404.000 1,404,000
I
I 2010 Unspecified
I
Scott County Highway Department
I 2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: CSAH 27 Reconstruction Location Map
I Project N u:~er: 70-627 -024 ~~~.:::~.~<>~ ~-' ,~~~W' ',j! ';.;;; ,']:.r~2;~..
Location: From CSAH 44 north 0.3 miles ..:.<. . "r.;~.L, . ,./ ,~", __:' ',-1' .'...-..'~..~,j:.
) c~ ,. -."'. ,- '-. ,," .;
I Description: Complete CSAH 27 reconstruction ~)<~'~_Y;',:'~~)<;':~.j".: "il.'KV,;;~T' i ,. ,.,",.,
," 'il' ,/ - \ ~ '
to 4 lane divided highway L.e .~ :'H E t;;,-.;L-!g- ~l'OT'wt..------_..-
I ~ue '~,:i:;:~(::~t~l~ "-" ~ ~~~Jl~ <"" 10,;.<
Purpose & Justification: ,...;,',: !-,..."...t;:;:-, i'''' ~ ':"=--..,..,_._/ ,~... SH "\... ~/
~ ' .0::' !n[~. ill'i :; -2!'~~;~-::.~" ~l
..,,~ !~~ r?l~ i ~ ~ ~~~ \ ~f-- )'"
I Purpose is to increase the safety, structural integrity, and
capacity of this segment of highway which provides an
east-west corridor between TH 13 and CSAH 27.
I ':
I Prior To Beyond
,~ ~-.. '
Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Federal Grants 0
State Grants.' ., " .. , ., 0
State-Aid 0
I County 172,000 2,148,000 2,320,000
Other I City " ' , 586,000 586,000
Other ", 0
I Other I PLA 69,000 69,000
,
Total 241,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,734,000 2,975,000
I '< -.'
Prior To Beyond
ProjectExpcllditures: . '., 200S 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Desi2:n - Staff 0
Desi2:n - Consultant 141,000 141,000
Ri2:ht-of-Wav .. Staff 0
I Ri2:ht-of-Wav.. Consultant 0
Ril!ht-of-Wav 100,000 100,000
Construction - Staff 0
I Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 2,734,000 2,734,000
,
I Total 241,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,734,000 2,975,000
I
I CSAH 27 (@44)
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Upgrading ofCSAH 44 Location Map
I Project Number: SAP 70-644-002 ~: {~"'..t:"
. .. . ""~
Location: CSAH 44 from PriorLake City limits to .,.y.,P .\ L ,~ : , (- )'.
I CSAH 27 (1.0 mile) in the City of Savage and Credit Rive ?, /~;';,';:;\5~':~~;;'i'>' 1 "::?::"7:,<' ~-f': (',,1
] y.... '! ,~, .'
Township. y.r~'r":L'" "; ,i\!"._o. E ~;~";~
" ,~-- ....... ~~''J
I Description: Reconstruction of CSAH 44 to a 4-lane j~~i;'i~-~t::{'j~J', ~~~~:'
urban design roadway with channelization at major ," ,!,,,, ,..~" 21 -;::YT~ ,. JI'
intersections. I, ,;'/ '. ,.;,... '. " c.: ) i ~ ~ i!! 5 ~ ,.,.. ST \ .It
i. '. '. . i : ! 0 i far:l! w 169lh ST.E.
I f\,}" '.',' · 'h W -
. .....' . '., .....!.. I: Ul II. W
Purpose & Justification: ,\( ."'~ 11000ST e ~L:2a.eAFlVPL
I Purpose is to increase the safety, structural integrity, and
capacity of this segment of highway which provides an
east-west corridor between TH 13 and CSAH 27.
I Prior To Beyond
Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Federal Grants 0
State Grants ,
, 0
State-Aid .. ,.. .. 0
I Countv 322,000 2,233,500 2,555,500
Other / City 542,000 542,000
Other , 0
I Other /'PLA 69,000 69,000
-
Total 391,000 0 0 0 0 o 2,775,500 3;166,500
,.... ,
I Prior To Beyond . .
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 ' 2009 2009 Total
Desil!n - Staff , 0
I Desil!n - Consultant 141,000 ". . -'" 141,000
Ril!ht-of-Way - Staff 0
Ril!ht-of- Way - Consultant 0
I Rieht-of-Wav 250,000 250,000
Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
I Construction 2,775,500 2,775,500
Total 391,000 0 0 0 0 o 2,775,500 3,166,500
I
I
I CSAH 44
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2011 FINAL DRAFT
SCOTT C,oUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Total
Road Type of Project Other County Anticipated
No. Location Length Construction Cost Costs Costs ".:.i Revenue
Levy 11,514,000
State-Aid 3,800,000
Belle Plaine Payment 90,000
PRESERVATION
-- County-Wide ..,10.00 Overlay/CrR 2,000,000 2,OOO,ooq
8 CSAH 23 to Calmor Ave. 0.50 Intersection Improvements 1,785,000 1,785,000
MANAGEMENT
87 CH 56 to CH 8 ' ,3.00 Reconstruct - 2 Lane, Rural/Surface 2,000,000 2,000,000
-- Unspecified -- Traffic Signals/Spot Safety/Contingency 1,474,000 1,474,000
EXPANSION
42 Boone to Louisiana 1.00 6 Lane Divided Reconstruct 8,413,500 2,100,000 6,313,500
15,672.500 2,100,000 13,572,500 15,404,000
ASSUMPTIONS:
5% Annual Inflation
$1 OOK annual State-Aid Increase
2.5% Annual Levy Increase
2011
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: 20ll Overlays Location Map
I~, Project Number:
',-
"-<: "~' :-:..- "'..'.';,-.
Location: Various - Countywide Countywide Locations
I
I Description: Bituminous Overlays for pavement
preservation
I Purpose & Justification:
As part of an overall pavement preservation program
I overlays are needed on a regular basis to preserve
the initial paving investment.
I
Prior To Beyond
I Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009, TotaL
Federal Grants 0'
State Grants 0
I State,;,Aid 0
County 2,000,000 2,000,000
Other I City 0
I- Other , 0
Other , , 0
.,'
I, Total - 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 2,000,000
-c-
~ Prior To Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Desii!n - Staff 0
Desii!n - Consultant 0
I Right~of-Wav - Staff 0
Rii!ht-of-Wav - Consultant 0
Rii!ht-of- W av 0
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 2,000,000 2,000,000
I Total 0 0 0 0 0 o 2,000,000 2,000,000
I
I 2011 Overlays
I
Scott County Highway Department
I 2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Improvements to CSAH 8 Location Map
I' Project Number:, SAP70-608-XX Fi~h"",r'E(,,~ ~ i, ~1205"EsT.I~
! 206"5r ~206"'sr,.e. ~ .
_~ J..ake,<.~ ~
, L' V' I . i ~)- Eo 20r.. :T.E. !!! 208." 87 'll
ocatlon: anous ocatlons along CSAH 8 ----Y' :'iW'" ~ ?',.E~.. _ __ .... . s
-+-- ,. ..._ ,_ _ ... m .. .,... _ __ _ _2.. .. - -- _, ___ ...., __
I- , 1 ~ ~ HILLS TR.
i ~ HICKORY RAVEN {'o/IV
Description: Provide safety improvements/studies at : H '~ ~
,
. I . I C H 8 213"'ST E
vanous ocatIons a ong SA. I . . <>
I Example-RealignCSAH8atCSAH23 ~l a: ll~' If-~
. ~I ui ~ McMahon
. . ' ll! > I Lak
mtersectIOn. "; ST. \~E SI. 8 ,,<( ~he o+~'1P.~G-
I G Catherine 4 I ~ ~~ 1l1-1'1r0
Purpose & Justification: ~ Lake I -# V,
, Projects would improve safety and provide better : 8A~SpR' 23 I ",87
I >, w
, continuity to CSAH 8. E.! : 64 '.... _ .,..,~ ,_-,..,..., :,.. ..i:.,.J 230'" ST. E".
~ ST e.. a;
~ ROCKRrOGE .. ~
, ~ CT. - (I · / I ~
I ! 233ROST,E. / ~ ~ i"',oWLI
Prior To Beyond
I,' Project Financing: 2005 20.0.5 20.0.6 20.0.7 20.0.8 20.0.9 2009 Total '
, Federal Grants 0
State Grants - ' 0
State-Aid 0
I County ,,' 1,785,000 1;785,000
Other, I City
Other
I O~ 0
, "
I Total 0 0 ", 0 .,'..,'"" 0 ,.0.' 0 1,785,000 1,785,000
" "
Prior To ,,' Beyond
I", Project Expenditures: 2005 20.0.5 20.0.6.. 20.0.7 20.0.8 20.0.9 2009 Total
Design - Staff ' 0
Design - Consultant 0
I Right-of-Wav - Staff 0
Right-of-Wav - Consultant 0
Right-of-Wav 105,000 105,000
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 1,680,000 1,680,000
I Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,785,000 1,785,000
I
I C~8
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Grade and Surface County Road 87 Location Map
" ~ ,( ~ ~ ~ 21" ST. ' ul
I Project Number: CP 2006-87-XX /f-... .. ~I ~ lM;::h~~U ~~~
~~ ."-, -:;Z./
,..'......::'.'i. , C.lher;re' ~ ~~.f ~ -,- 00
.!i L"".e . 81 ..
Location: CH 87 between CH 56 and CSAH 8 .. I .
,
I (2.75 miles) in Cedar Lake Township. e.. ~3 Cedar k --I:L New Market
Twp. h twp.
2301 ST. e. . '2JOI $T.!..
64
Description: Project consists of the reconstruction of st, e. )r" "
I CH 87 to current 2-lane rural design standards. Bituminou -( ~l ..... 12
surfacing is in 2007 CIP. ~ p:' ~"~ ' ' ~
~ l\ L 1.ah: 8K ~
~ ',,- ":1 ,...
I ~ w~. ~ '---' rr
Purpose & Justification: ;;/ ~ u ~
i ~ t"
Project will upgrade the geometries to current standards. 1] " ~\ ~ ...
"~ ~ ) ~ ..st"...
I This will improve the safety and load-carrying capacity ~s ~ <8 r) g
= 1> "", 'i( i'<>~
of the roadway, reduce maintenance costs and resident 56 \ 11, 56 \
I complaints. .~~/-lJ ~ "
,.
,
Prior To ' " .. Beyond
Project Financing: 2005 '". 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Federal Grants 0
State Grants - , 0
,
State-Aid 0
I County . 2,000,000 2,000,000
, "
Other I City , 0
Other '. :, '" 0
I Other , .0
.. ,
,
Total ,. .'0 ..- 0 0 ,,'.., 0 0 o 2,000,000 2,000,000
I " -c- - ,','
'Prior:To . .. Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005 200S 2006 2007 ,2008 2009 2009 Total
I Desi~n - Staff ", 0
Desi~n - Consultant " 0
Ril!:ht-of-Wav - Staff , 0
I Ril!:ht-of-Way - Consultant 0
Ri~ht-of-Wav 0
Construction - Staff 0
I Construction - Consultant 0
Construction ' 2,000,000 2,000,000
I Total , 0 0 0 0 0 o 2,000,000 2,000,000
I
I CH87
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Unspecified Construction Location Map
I Project Number:
.' '- ---
Location: Countywide Countywide Locations
I
I Description: Contingency for spot safety, traffic
signals, and construction contingency.
I Purpose & Justification: ,
Annually, needs arise that require the County to respond
I' to issues-on the highway system and this funding enables
the County to do so. Additionally, there is a need to
I budget for construction contingencies such as changes
(Supplemental Agreements) and overruns of quantities.
,
I Prior To Beyond
Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009- - Total
Federal Grants , 0
State Grants , , 0
1- State-Aid- ," 0
County 1,474,000 1,474,000
Other I City . 0
1- Other , 0
Other , 0
. -
, Total -, - 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,474,000 1,474,000
1-
Prior To Beyond I", - .,
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Desh!n - Staff , 0
Design - Consultant 0
I Right-of-Wav - Staff 0
Right-of-Way - Consultant 0
Right-of-Way 0
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 1,474,000 1,474,000
I Total 0 0 0 0 0 o 1,474,000 1,474,000
I
I 2011 Unspecified
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Signal and Turn Lanes Location Map
I Project Number: 70-642-017
'S'.,..;.... ,.' : " ;
. I '.,', .... _
Location: CSAH 42 between Boone and ~ . i). .: ,~1~':'iY- .rh!",I:.
I Louisiana r,V '1":<,,. ,1;6, '\.;'~. t:}'
," ,....:.. ,..' ,(Z.,., 1"':::'<
L___ __uJ.,:..c ::':}"'-:, 'J\:' i_) .' .L..ru.L:
Description: Provide a permanent signal at Quebec ,.........,..... .1 ":..
16 :~ ::.:. ..,. :,:..~~>;.,J... '; :::::'tLl..
I and dual left turns at TH 13. Restrict I ..,.~) ,.<;b. ",' " '
I . -. ," . : ;.. ~
access at Commerce Ave. "i" .....;,42 ", ' ~\.; ,
-;:,',:;:'''' ;.. ,', i'-~' .,: .",' ....
, j: '.,'.: ::":-'(;,:::: ,'i ~ \, .';,:?,; i,
.. .. <,......-...,/ ""4:; '" 'M., , ".,
I Purpose & Justification: /~ ~0~-,,~ tf!' . "!' t ':
I Proposed developments in the north and south east
quadrants ofCSAH 42 and TH 13 have identified
existing deficiencies in this area.
I Prior To Beyond
Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Federal Grants , 0
"
State Grants , '. -, , , 0
I State-Aid 0
County 150,000 603,750 341,250 341,250 4,877,250 6,313,500
Other I City 2,100,000 2,100,000
Other " 0
I Other 0
Total 150,000 0 0 603,750 ", 341,250 341 ;250 6,977,250 8,413,500
I ,
Prior To , Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005 " 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Design - Staff 0
Design - Consultant 150,000 262,500 , 412,500
I Ril:!ht-of-Wav - Staff 0
Right-of- Way - Consultant 0
Ril:!ht-of-Wav 341,250 341,250 341,250 341,250 1,365,000
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 6,636,000 6,636,000
I Total 150,000 0 0 603,750 341 ,250 341,250 6,977,250 8,413,500
I
I CSAH 42 Boone to Louisiana
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2012 FINAL DRAFT
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Total
Road Type of Project Other County Anticipated
No. Location Length Construction Cost Costs Costs Revenue
Levy 12,,589,000
State-Aid 3,900,000
Belle Plaine Payment 90,000
PRESERVATION
-- County-Wide ,.,10,00 Overlay/CIR 2,000,000 2,000,000
MANAGEMENT
21 CH 82 to CH 87 3.50 Corridor Improvements 9,405,000 1,750,000 7,655,000
56 CH 23 to CH 87 1.50 Reconstruct.2 Lane Rural/Surface 1,000,000 1,000,000
-- Unspecified .. Traffic Signals/Spot Safety/Contingency 1,548,000 1,548,000
EXPANSION
17 St. Francis to CH 42 2.00 Reconstruct - 4 Lane Divided . 7,770,000 525,000 7,245,000
21,723,000 2,275,000 19,448,000 16,579,000
,.1
ASSUMPTIONS:
5% Annual Inflation \
$100K annual State-Aid Increase
2.5% Annual Levy Increase
2012
,.1
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005- 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: 2012 Overlays Location Map
Ie Project Number:
-
Location: Various - Countywide Countywide Locations
I
I Description: Bituminous Overlays for pavement
preservation
I Purpose & Justification:
As part of an overall pavement preservation program
I overlays are needed on a regular basis to preserve
the initial paving investment.
I
Prior To Beyond
I Projed Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Federal Grants 0
State Grants 0
I State-Aid , 0
County <2,000,000 2,000,000
Other I City 0
I Other 0
Other " - 0
I Total 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 2,000,000 2,000,000
Prior To Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008. -' 2009 2009 Total
I Design - Staff 0
Design - Consultant 0
I Right-of-Way - Staff 0
Right-of-Wav - Consultant 0
Ril!ht-of-Way 0
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 2,000,000 2,000,000
I Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 2,000,000
I
I 2012 Overlays
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Intersection & Corridor Improvements Location Map
I ~roject Number: ~. 70-621-XXX
Location: CSAH 82 to CR 87
I Description: Provide channelization and tom lanes }~ :t,.t-&". ..>'.:.".,,"' t'~~l' .
I . '. ~e~:~' ,,:)F;.~;{j'~~~j1~~;::~~.~;.~~Y~~'J1.~ ~,~~.;;;~: Us , ; ~~i ~~,7
Purpose & Justification. '", 'C I:J>"'",,:,:') , ,:, ; ,,', ,.,., , ",""v :, 'I...,:," .j9 ~I r.;,~ ~I.'C ~
~s);~{[:~fi~.:l1;{~rJ::_/:,;:::':Y? .;:,...,.>~,:...;:.....,.;~t ::i1?/r"'Y:";'; , ) ;.:.lj illi~..jf ID G)~
I Current intersections pose safety issues for traffic turning ""'~:$:f;:ri:'::..l~ f'~;~~lE ',.~~S~({,~~~~ii\'ii~. 87~~'
. . t~ '1'.' (23 ~;t' I "j;."
left off of CSAH 21. Project would prOVIde protected left ",/ir" :;:~ g [~ ' , ~. [,' ~ ..'" ',', ~,,~n
~ ~ 3'~<1 --l- ~ .
turn lanes. !I.. ~ I~. ~ ~ ~ " ',' ~ ~ &. 2'
I .. < I~ ~ ~ w , . fiJj ..'" ",< "~
L "I ~1...__1r ..I~. ~l!ir~: ~: .....0
l2... ~~~ _ "'11l1"d S1 E n'I~,' '/ ,
I Prior To Beyond
Project Financing: ' . 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Federal Grants ' , ' 0
State Grants " 0
State-Aid 5,400,000 5,400,000
I Countv160,OOO " 200,000 375,000 1,520,000 2,255,000
Other I City," 1,750,000 1,750,000
Other ",' 0
I Other. .._ 0
Total ,_ 160,000 ',' 0 0 -;:- ',' 0 200,000 375,000 8,670,000 9,405,000
I ',',' ".
, '. PriotTo I ", I,' Beyond
Project Expenditures: 2005 200S 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
I Desien - Staff' ..',. " , ". ., 1 0
, Desien - Consultant -160,000 ' 200,000 375,000 200,000 935,000
Rieht-of-Wav -Staff 0
I Riebt-of-Way - Consultant 0
Rieht.of-Wav 1.000,000 1.000,000
Construction - Staff 0
I Construction - Consultant 553,760 553,760
Construction 6,916.240 6,916,240
I Total 160.000 0 0 0 200,000 375,000 8,670,000 9,405.000
I
I CSAH 21 (13 & PL)
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Grade and Surface County Road 56 Location Map
I ~ '000011 -
I Project Number: 2006-56-XX f! Lake j
-"._" ,',- - 240th
l"'" "'<>sr DR, ,
Location: CH 56 between CSAH 23 and CH 87 242nd Sf.
I (1.5 miles) in Cedar Lake Township. ~ ~ ~
~
15 14 ~ W 13
MSllER ~ -'
--;~ '5
Description: Project consists of the reconstruction of \l! 0
PLo", 8
I ~ IMO 87 ....
CH 56 to current 2-lane rural design standards. Bituminous e, " ~ ff- ~
surfacing is included in 2007 CIP. 56 \ 56
I ' ~ ~ I1l Cedar lake Twp.
Purpose & Justification: 22 / -"L ~ ~
-=/' t - 24
Project will upgrade the geometrics to current standards. rr ". "" ,
f&lar ~3 I
This will improve the safety and load-carrying capacity a a ~
I ~
of the roadway, reduce mamtenance costs, and 26Ol/1 Sl. .
))
reduce resident complaints. ~
I ~ ~ ~
Prior To Beyond
I Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Federal Grants 0
-- State Grants - - ,_, .0
--
I State-Aid 0
County . 1,000,000 1,000,000
Other ICity
I Other
Other - 0
I Total' ..," 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ,000,000 1,000,000
. Prior To Beyond "
'-I Project Expenditures: . 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 ,.2009 Total"
Desil!n.... Staff 0
Design - Consultant , 0
Right-of-Way - Staff , 0
I Right-of-Way - Consultant 0
Right-of-Way 0
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 1,000,000 1,000,000
,
I Total 0 0 0 0 0 o 1,000,000 1,000,000
I
I CH56
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Unspecified Construction Location Map
I Project Number:
~, ' --. ~-
Location: Countywide Countywide Locations
I
I Description: Contingency for spot safety, traffic
signals, and construction contingency.
I Purpose & Justification:
Annually, needs arise that require the County to respond
I to issues on the highway system and this funding enables
the County to do so. Additionally, there is a need to
I budget for construction contingencies such as changes
(Supplemental Agreements) and overruns of quantities. '"
I Prior To Beyond
Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Federal Grants ,". .. ..., "' , 0
State Grants 0
I State-Aid , , 0
County 1548000 1,548,000
Other I City , 0
I Other -cc " 0
Other " " " ' " 0
I Total 0 " 0", -,- 0 , 0 0 '-" o 1,548,000 1,548,000
Prior To Beyond
I Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006.. ." 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Desil!n - Staff .. 0
Design - Consultant 0
I Ril!ht-of-Wav - Staff 0
Right-of-Wav - Consultant 0
Right-of-Wav 0
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 0
Construction 1,548,000 1,548,000
I Total 0 0 0 0 0 o 1,548,000 1,548,000
I
I 2012 Unspecified
I
I Scott County Highway Department
2005 - 2012 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
I Project Title: Upgrade CSAH 17 Location Map
'1'l V' ~9'~}('(/{ -
I Project Number: 70-617-XXX ~ "-"~~'___.~ ~'" - X~~
Location: Between St. Francis A venue and ~ ~ ~ ~ ; i
I CH 42 4V' 2,~ " .,-./"]D1"" ; ~
~~~ !Wi .J.l...C;f i ~
Description: Upgrade CSAH 17 to a 4-lane 11211 t 0 ~ ~ \
I divided roadway. :~~ST w~ ~ ~~.;. ~ ~ha:ob~e '.
. . ...::.., 'P~ ST:.E. rit : N rl--
Purpose &Justdicahon: 'ROOKE "'- ! '
I To increase safety and capacity of this segment of :r......u. ;?0RVE~; i sf
highway. TAL (JIO~:':' ...... ~ I ~
I /fE~~""
I ;I;>~ I~ak" '" : ", ~;LL--'
J 2'!::::2 I ~ g
lie I I"
~ M _, ,j.... I ~ .
I "
Prior To Beyond
I Project Financing: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Federal Grants - , 0
State Grants 0
I State-Aid 0
County 262,500 262,500 6,720,000 7,245,000
Other I City . 525,000 525,000
I Other " " ", 0
Other ,. 0
I Total, ,.". 0 0 0 0 262,500 262,500 7,245,000 7,770,000
,,' , ,,'
Prior To " ',,' Beyond
I' Project Expenditures: 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Total
Desit?;n - Staff 0
Desit?;n - Consultant 262,500 262,500 525,000
I Ril!ht-of-Wav-Staff 0
Right-of-Way - Consultant 0
Right-of-Way 1,575,000 1,575,000
I Construction - Staff 0
Construction - Consultant 420,000 420,000
Construction 5,250,000 5,250,000
I Total 0 0 0 0 262,500 262,500 7,245.000 7,770,000
I
,
I CSAH 17
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Scott County Public Works
TRANSPORTATION STUDIES LIST
COST
STUDY # ROAD LOCATION TYPE TIME RANGE RESOURCE COMMENTS
Studies Iu
Progress ,
Corridor Alignment ,
4 CSAH 8 TH \69toTH21 RJW identification MED MED CONSULT System continuirv and R/W nreservation. ,
5 CSAH 8 CSAH 23 Intersection Relocation SHORT LOW STAFF Safetv desien
Interchange Design & RJW
6 CSAH 9 TH I 69ffH 282 preservation MED LOW STAFF Started with MnDOT the lead
-
9 CSAH IS TH 13/1 9 to 270th Street Highway Realignment LONG MED CONSULT System continuitv and RJW oreservation.
$400,000-$500.000
2-year study. Scoping contract approved with SRF.
13 CSAH 21 CSAH 42 to Sltakooee Bvoass EIS LONG SPECIAL CONSULT Initial TAC meeting 3/28/02, ..
R/W preservation-long tenn
$250.000 MnDOT funds available for study
" TH4tl New Major River LONG- CONSULT & Consultant selected 8/02.
ZZ TH 169 TH 169toTH212 Crossing/Alignment 3 Years SPECIAL MNDOT Scoll County Cost Share. $25.000 Study start - Sentember 2002
Highway Design ,
Z8 CSAH 21 CSAH 82 to CR 87 R/W Identification SHORT MED CONSULT Need to address access <naeino and turn lanc issues alono CSAH 21
Study Needs: ,/
Corridor Alignment
1 CSAH 2 TH 169toCR61 RJW Identification MED MEn CONSULT Lon2 tenn needs
Future Interchange Design R/W
2 CSAH 2 135 Identilication MED LOW MNDOT & STAFF R/W preservation.
Conidor Alignment System continuity - study partially complete
8 CSAH 15 CSAH \0 to TH 282 RJW Identification, MEn LOW STAFF ON HOLD
Conidor Alignment! MNDOT. CITY & TH 169 study
14 CR61 CR 66 to TH 169 Intersection Location MED MED CONSULT R/W preservation
Conidor Alignment Continuily gap - Vergus to CR 81
16 CSAH 68 TH 13 toCSAH 23 RJW Identification SHORT LOW STAFF Study coordinated with development
Conidor Ali8nmenu MED. CONSULT &
17 CR 70 TH t6910 CSAH 17 RfW' preservation LONG MED STAFF Potential Future Counly Highway connection to TH 169
Future Interchange Design R/W
18 CSAH 78 TH I 69ffH41 identification " LONG LOW-MED CONSULT TH 169 IRC recommendation
Future Interchange Design R/W preservation-long tenn
20 CSAH 86 135 RJW identification MED LOW MNDOT & STAFF InvolVes ScoU. Dakota. & Rice Counties and MnDOT
CSAH 16 Corridor Alignment , R1W preservation and coordination with future annexation. Coordinate ~ith
26 17th Ave) CSAH 78 to CSAH 15 RiW'ldentilication' " MED MED CONSULT River Crossing study recommendations.
Feasibility Study ofLong-lenn "
29 CSAH 42 Louisiana A vc. to East County Lin improvements MED MEt> CONSULT Future congestion exoected based on 20.Year modeHng and recent studies
TH 169 in Sand Creek Twp (North Corridor Alignment CONSULT & Study to consider possibility of rerouting TH 282 north of Jordan to deal with
30 TH 282 of Jordan) R1W; Identification MED MED MNDOT existing and future access/mobility issues
Corridor Alignment " MNDOT. CITY & Study to consider possibility of extending CR 61 in Jordan 10 aUeviate the TH
31 CR66 TH21toCSAH 10 RfW ldentilication MED LOW STAFF 21 and TH .282 intersection
Canidar Alignment CONSULT &
32 CSAH 68 CSAH 2\ and CSAH 68 MV Identification: MED MED STAFF Studv to consider possibility of connecting CSAH 68 to CSAH 21
KEY: I1.Ilm.. om:.
SHORT: < 6 months LOW: < Si5,000 ,
MED: 6 - 18 monlhs MED: S25,OOO - $50,000
LONG: > 18 months HIGH: > $50,000
w:lwordlstudieslgenerallSlatus 9.o4,xIs
--------- I
I
I
I Scott County
I TRANSPORTATION
I STUDIES STATUS
I FOR 2005 BUDGET PROCESS
I Study Areas Legend ~
I .. Complete Early 2005 N
Ell In Progress
,--""",
I .. Future Study Need
I
I ----
I I ( l,o.
r
I
F
i L
I
I
I
I -
I
I --
I s: \1 oea I 9 is \d e pa rtm e nts \tra ns portati on \p ro j eets \stud i es . a p r
-.. _.~-- -- - -. -. -- .- --_.- -- -~ -..- - -
-------------------
I~ I 1 ~ I K. I . ~ 'J
-.:.. -> LJv '"""---~ _ _~\~. l)'~ --~'~. ~ -r \
"\.~'''' " " Scott County. :: ~ - '-.. ~_~71' ~~~,.~ ~V
IScott Minnesota I ~ ""'='"0"":- 69 14 .. "\), ~~hi ..=
/ ~, ' t. _ ,\ 'C, ~ ~ - - . N 'I, /"'" ~" #i
CommunityReque",to2005-2009 " -~ -J ~ ~_:, _~ - : - _ 'ro "[J';;;l., ~ Q Ib~-: :t; ~ f 8 ~~~
Hl'ghwayProaram ~....... ,,~ .;....'~.,,'3,r,'<" -I".1Ie' 113 .; ''''~,~;;' ,_
0' L, I 15~~ ~~))-i -' "11--- " I ~ f --
- 41'. 77 5 17 '~ v.~- - -u ! \ 1 2 -,...,--' ,/ _
l-CHI6be.weenCHI8andTII13.Reeonst.uello4Iancs ~ '\ ~, 0 ,,", 1 83 ~~~y_ ,~~,~ ,/
2-SignallnSlallation-CH 16(l~~CH27 i "'----- L~ 78 u :: 12 '~ r ,"" 111'10 \\~I ~----
3-ClI16beovccnClI83andCH 18. Re<onstll'ello 4 lanc:; J ~ "':l '/- 4~ 79 I f-r':1-Lll1, ~i.J;;;\ ~-:.,,' ~,~ (:;;;;1",,: y.~\ ~
4-CII79be.wccnll.hAvenueandCII78.rc"Con,,,uellOn .. " ' 1_ I - s...k l~ V ,\ ,j iT!.) Y "~-'?L 'r~c-~Y:J. l~) I../r Z
6 - CH 83@ 4th A,,~nue inlerse~tion hnprovcmcnls I( ~9 ~}~ '- ~ I~ 1\j I'" Jl~.:J1 - ~ '..N
7 - CH 83 Remainin.. 'eLonents between CII 82 f ~ "~ <-" ~L' J~I <l ~. It' .,.. \..., ,',' 27 ,J,~;'r"~ I ) I J'
.::> - i '\ I q ;'/''1 ....a: I "'?:;sY A
and Wilds Parkway and CH42 andCH 16. recOllStllu.:t lo-t lanes. 1 _ ./ I 14.. ~ 21 'II -.... ~-<.::- .., ...-,: _~.I -IT
8. Extension prqjecl from Lynn Ave.@ell 16 to Chowen Ave. (~I!. HI 13 I - (", r" I v.~c 82 ~f'"" Q, 'I S C
9-CSAHJ3 improvements and It.."quest fortumback I TI? J169l_ - /2..1: J ;'J ~.'" / I
b~ ~ 5L-" "b 44 b.,':J-- --1
81 '".., " ~'
Sludics: ~"\ ~ _ . 17 ;;..:(. ,>," '/-1-------- ~,; i--=L..
-~. ~ ~ u
IO-SigllaISludies-CH 16~!iVelllOllAvcnue.CI-I'27({!!C0l111el]yParkway. / I-- 70 '~\_<', 12 ~.,,: ~l ~ t=s:: f-
eIl27@Loftu,Lane,CII27@150.hSI.&CII n~" South PalX Dr, (when finished) \ L (-' 1 , ,t<3>- [7~"; ~):. "" 7T'~: '1: ~
fl_Cllf6@Cllf8f.c-.c...,F;../,::;;;jt\ - ~i ,,=, ,," Sf' 87 ~I~I ~ L-
",--.1/ If' -;,I 79 ~ ~ L.: '- '_~
12-CIIS3(ivValleyViewRoad V L I , 13 '/ ~<1f' I
13-CII17Qv4thAve.IO.hAve.&V.edll1<D, ) 9 ((51 'y :3J/ 1 -""",0-;, r
14 - CII 79@v'erhngDnve,m'e"eellon",:p'ovemen\>/)/fl..y_,<oJJ,rb:%J,CI r j' :IT fr If Ji(1" ~ \
15-CSAII15fi'omTII169'ofu',"'eI7.hAve :? J:5<-'i1.' 282 EC ~>- 81 :l-.
f6"Fu.",~Alignlllen'ofCH 15 and ClI89 / ./ I ti' ( , ..),J.j U~~
__~7 ./ "'_ . 71 I 68
be.wccn 270th St. W.aJldTHf9 ~~\/ ~ I oJ..:J I I - v-:. \
4" "J ,.. 10 /87 ,.:::0 , '1
IT' l~~"? q ,I 1 I ) ,_ \2
~_ I lii'1 r_~f!. _~~~~ ~.~:,;{ I ~i-"LP;:I>-- ~I 91 <J. ,,---.-L.
Z- ~1l'l, ,... - n r 231 c:C --J:f 1;-1: J
- ------ )_d)l) - I-- I - _ /'~\
'---l )~pe~ =- V-~ \ 61 -' \ ~. II I:; =.~. ~~:....I.: ,,8 ~/' iTl
~ ,,~/ 6 '!fIA5, ) I ~ l Af--- ~\ J [13 f' I~, 0 "' 0 f-J \ -.c" ~v
,,/ ~~j[:;:h:rUY.7) ~ ~ ,,64 / \.:/~~- -G; L: ~ r- ..1~ ~!
<F:,~ 60 ;,':f~;J~ \19 11 (',::". Jr 0:JrI I ~,1 -~ ~Ln-W<
~P' .... - "\-, I- y..- lJ ~ 64 ~ t- W....L.J-, -, 'Y J
~~ 1 5 I-- \21 \.. I 62 .
r! l ~ ~;. ^ ~ '-,P1 h i
~, -~..- I ~ - 89;' , I ~6 ~ ) I I,. " 46W-
-,.1 3 /L ~~ ~ 0 ,=- "1 I- 0 h I
"\j f:\ - I k) U.. Il;~=-'- I' .
tf~ 51 'I c?' 2;) I 2 r"-" I ,..... I
-~';~ V~ 53 IL _Lrf- Q ""~ ..._c.,15 [,-16 - IT >f ei~~~!.2L~ rrli
J r~ I-J Ir I I-- , ~ ~ ,9 85 ',.J '\{ (9';)~}.-J Ir= I
if~ J)~ \! I III r-rT\2?/i fr-. rl I ,..'-., -1 I I, I - I~
t~ . \ I I ( ~ I I I , I ~ ~ r I) I l 86 I I I t-I )' I
I~~_'_'~'___"'''_''~''_I J,_ I () I 2 3 4 Map Date, July26,2004
~gg~~~f;;~.:fi~~~~ \\-~ I ~l_ I I I J Scale: It,F.:
=::~;.::=~~~~.....--'"'....,_.~"~. A1iles I inch = 12,{XI(J li..~t I : 1..f..l,(XXJ
t..or<>ut _ 200S.:!009CQl..... R8<JU'I'I~IL;>y<I'ACl Ptqod L",,""'" S"l.OCAI.-GlS'OEPARTI.lENTS\lRAI'ISPU'lTAlION>PAO-ECT5'IXll.u.I-,<<OauESTSAPR.
I.,~ ____--'._._ ,___.__ __.___.._.___~.__
I ,
,
DRAFT
I Community Requests to 2005-2009 Highway Program
I MAP # AGENCY REQUEST COUNTY RESPONSE
I Savage Move the CSAH 42 & Huntington project into 2005 or possibly 2006, as this is the County will move to appropriate year.
earliest construction could start.
I Savage Coordination of sanitary sewer and roadway improvements along the CSAH County is moving project to the 2010 Construction TIP based on funding need allowing time for the City to
27/CSAH 44 project. The timing for the sewer extension could cause a delay for the fully evaluate sanitary extension options.
I roadway improvements.
I Savage Requests a meeting to review cost participation formulas on various projects: CouptY staff will continu"eto meef with Savage staff to discuss how costs have been estim'ated. It should be
CSAH 42 & Huntington (Access and signal revisions) noted that one of the elements ofthe County's upcoming Transportation Plan process is to discuss project cost
, CSAH 42 - Segment 8 (Widen to six lanes) participation with the Cities and Townships. County and City staff have already met to determine cost
I CSAH 42- Boone to Louisiana (Widen to six lanes) .. part:icipationfor CSAH42 and Huntington access improvements.
CSAH 27/CSAH 44 - 154th Street to Savage/Prior Lake border (Widen to 4-
lane divided)
I
8 Savage Requests the funding from the old CSAH 27 extension project between CSAH l6 County staffbeliey~s that theCSAH 27 extension funds have been re~allocated to the appropriate projects.
I and,TH 13 be reallocated to their current extension project from Lynn Ave at CSAH
16 to Chowell Ave at TH 13.
I Savage City would like the County to continue to monitor the following intersections to The TIP does not specifically schedule intersections that are proposed to be signalized. It is our policy to
detennine if signals are warranted: include a lump sum in each year of the TIP to accommodate justified traffic signals, spot safety improvements
I and contingencies. We will continue to monitor intersections and signalize intersections when a traffic study
2 CSAH 16 and CSAH 27 shows a signal is warranted and justified at each location.
10 CSAH 27 and Connelly Parkway
I 10 CSAH 27 and Loftus Lane CSAH 16/CSAH 27 - signal construction is in progress.
10 CSAH 16 and Vemon A venue
10 CSAH 27 & 150th Street CSAH 27/Vemon Ave - this intersection will be studied once the signal is installed on CSAH 16/CSAH 27.
i 10 CSAH 27& South Park Drive (when South Park Drive is complete) Signals are not yet justified at the remainder of the intersections based on current traffic conditions. These
intersections will continue to be monitored each year.
I 1 Savage CSAH 16 from CSAH 18 to TH 13 should be programmed in the TIP as a four-lane Based on current traffic volumes, this segment does not yet reach the threshold where staff would recommend a
I divided section in the near future. capacity expansion proj~~t. We will monitor",this as development occurs and will program an improvement
- .-.--.- ,"::hen needed. Based on current funding, the County is not adding expansion projects to the TIP.
I Shako pee City supports the current planning of CSAH 21 extension from CSAH 18 to CSAH County plans to complete DEIS in May 2005 and programmed construction, based on current funding, in
42 and would like to see the project remain in the 5-year TIP and have the DEIS 2008/2009.
I completed as scheduled.
I
I' MAP # AGENCY REQUEST COUNTY RESPONSE
I 3 Shakopee CSAH 16 between CSAH 83 and CSAH 18 - the City anticipates further Based on current traffic volumes, this segment does not yet reach the threshold where staff would recommend a
development in this area and believes this should be programmed into the 5 year TIP capacity expansion project. We will monitor this as development occurs and will program an improvement
I as this segment could develop potential safety problems. when needed. Based on current funding, the County is not adding expansion projects to the TIP.
1 13 Shakopee The City has obtained Federal grants to improve CSAH 17 at 10th & 4th A venues County has discussed with the City to not construct 10lh and 41h Avenue because the recent 3-lane conversion
and request the County to conduct a study to detennine what improvements can be seems to be operating well. We concur that the 3-lane conversion is not the long-term solution and will work
done with the grant time frame. Would also like the intersection of CSAH 17 and with the City to develop a scope in 2005 to study (in 2006) CSAH 17 from CSAH 101 to Vierling Drive to
I Vierling Drive to be studied. develop future needs. Staff has coordinated with the railroad and project is moving ahead as scheduled with
Union Pacific doing work.
I In the short-term (2005), Countystaffwill evaluate CSAH 17 from 1 ih Avenue to Vierling Drive for potential
operational improvements.
I 4 Shakopee CR79 between 11th Avenue and CR78...,. the city anticipates growth in this area arid In cooperation with the School, Developer, and City, County staff is wotkingondevelopingthe~future ,layout
I, a new high school and secondary school, which is anticipated to bebuiltwestofCR and needs for CR 79, CR 77, and future CSAH 16 (1 th Avehue). ,,'" ", ' .
79 by 2007, therefore, requests that a study be done todetenninethe necessary
improvements and include those improvements in the 5 year TIP.
I 5 17th A venue extension from CR 15 to CR 79 - request that this be included in the 5 County staff will need to resolve actual costs and develop a MOV/Agreement with the City in the next few
'I year TIP as this will become necessary with the recently annexed areas, from weeks. County will add this project to the TIP with funding for both CR 79 and .17th Avenue of $350,000 in
Jackson Township and the,Shakopee School District's referendum of constructing a years 2005, 2006, 2007.
new high school and secondary school along 1 ih A venue between CR 77 and CR
I 79.
I Shakopee The City requests that the County review and monitor the following intersections for CR 79/ Vierling Drive - this is included in the ongoing Shakopee High Schooll th A venue Traffic Study.
possible traffic control signal warrants:
CSAH 16 / CSAH l8 - We will continue to monitor intersection and signalize intersection when a traffic study
I 14 CR 79 and Vierling Drive shows a signal is warranted and justified.
11 CSAH 16 and CSAH l8
~ 12 CSAH 83 and Valley View Road CSAH 83 I Valley View Road - Road is being built. County staffwiIl monitor once the road is reconstructed.
I CSAH 83 south of 1 ih Ave to City Limit Line - Requests a study and possible County staff will continue to monitor this segment and program it for improvements when needed. Based on
7 Shakopee
I improvements to CSAH 83 in the future. current funding, the County is not adding expansion projects to the TIP.
I 6 ShakQpee,,: 4th Ave and CSAH 83 - the City believes that signal and turn lane improvements The AUAR..completed for the area shows that'long-tenn a signal and a left turn lane is needed.'~<This signal -~~"5':"<-
will be needed by 2006/2007, dependent upon the Shenandoah Business Park and revision will follow County policy with the developer being required to provide the needed intersection
future expansion of the Opus development. improvement which is consistent with "growth paying for itself',
I
15 Shakopee CSAH 15 from TH l69 to future 1 th Ave - The City is anticipating commercial County staff will continue to monitor this segment and program it for improvements when needed. To be
I growth in this area and requests the County to review the traffic volume and growth consistent with "growth paying for itself', development will be required to provide needed infrastructure.
to . detennine whether any improvements will be necessary and program those
improvements into the 5 year TIP.
I
I MAP # AGENCY REQUEST COUNTY RESPONSE
I Shakopee CSAH 17 from S1. Francis Ave to CSAH 78 - due to the expansion of St. Francis The project is currently programmed for 2012 in the TIP and is based on regional growth in the area.
Medical Center, the City supports improvements in this area in connection with the
I possible relocation of S1. Francis Ave, future signal at CSAH 17, and construction of
Valley View Road from Evergreen Lane to Sarazin Street.
-...
I 7 SMSC CSAH 83, upgrading to a four lane divided roadway from CSAH 16 to CSAH 42. County staff will continue to monitor this segment and program it for improvements when needed. Right-of-
Way will need to be preserved through development process. Based on current funding, the County is not
I adding expansion projects to the TIP.
I 16 New Prague , Due to possible development pressures along CSAH 15 within the next five years, Development of an MOD will determine funding and needs.>
the city would like Scott County to begin programming funds for the possible right-
I of-way acquisition an~ construction of the future extension of CSAH 15.
I New Prague . Request safety improvements artheintersection of CR 89 / TH 19 due to being off- The County is supportive'of this project as cdeteffi1inedbythe Study ahdwill work with City Staff and MnDOT
set from LeSueur County Road 164~With the current traffic volumes, the city feels over the next year to determine scope, schedule, and budgefofthe project.
this intersection has become very dangerous and would like to see the improvements
I programmed as soon as possible.
I 9 Elko Would like France A venue (CSAH 33) turned back to the City, after needed Staff is supportive of determining needed improvements and turning the road back.
improvements are made.
I mk-w:\word\cip\2005-2009\comm _request_slafCresponse.doc
I
I
I
I
"~I- :1~;>' '~'.~~:""
I
I
I