HomeMy WebLinkAbout15.B.2. Final Plat for Riverside Fields 4th Addition, located west of CSAH 18 and north of Crossings Blvd.-Res. No. 6187
CITY OF SHAKOPEE IS. 8.:2,
Memorandum
CASELOG NO.: 05-022 CONSENT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Mark Noble, Planner I
SUBJECT: Final Plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition
MEETING DATE: February 15, 2005
REVIEW PERIOD: December 24,2004 to April 22, 2005
INTRODUCTION:
Centex Homes has submitted an application for final plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition,
located west of CSAH 18 and south of future CSAH 21 (Exhibit A). . This property is presently
legally described as Outlot C, Riverside Fields 3rd Addition, and has an area of 15.17 acres, with
0.04 acres proposed as outlot area, 2.9 acres proposed as public right-of-way, and 12.26 acres
proposed as lot area.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The applicant is proposing to develop the fourth phase of Riverside Fields, which would
consist of three (3) streets with 76 single-family reside'ntiallots. This 4th Addition is located
north of Crossings Boulevard, and west of the 3rd Addition and future commercial
development. As part of the preliminary plat approval, the development received approval to
have 50 foot lot widths and IS-foot structure separations for the lots north of Crossings
Boulevard, with no side yard setback being less than five feet. Several lots may not have 50
feet of street frontage, but they do exceed the required 50 foot lot width as measured at the
building setback line.
The submitted final plat is generally consistent with the approved preliminary plat, except that
they have requested a variance to allow Fescue Circle to be constructed as an over1~ngth cul-
de-sac (Exhibit B), rather than as a street that loops back to Crossings Boulevard along the
commercial development proposed adj acent to County Road 18 (Exhibit C). The developers
of these projects have proposed an emergency access connection between Fescue Circle and
the commercial development for public safety vehicles. At the February 3,2005 Planning
Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed a PUD Concept Plan for that commercial
development, and recommended that the commercial and residential projects develop without
a street connection (they did support an emergency access connection). However, their
recommendation only addressed the street layout, andJhat the overlength cul-de-sac request
was not part oftheir discussion.
Staff have reviewed the criteria for granting a variance, and have prepared findings as noted
below.
FINDINGS
Section 11.89, Subd. 2, of the City Code contains provisions for the granting of variances only if
all of the following circumstances are found to exist. Staff has provided draft findings on each
criterion. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals may use or modify these draft [mdings as it
sees fit:
Criterion I
The strict enforcement of the ordinance provisions would cause undue hardship because
of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Undue hardship
means the following:
1.A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under
conditions allowed by the official controls;
Finding J.A. The property can be put to a reasonable use under the official controls,
such that the construction of a public street could comply with the City Design
Criteria for cul-de-sac length, yet still provide the required street frontage and lot
widths for single:family lots and provide the recommended emergency access
connection.
1.B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property;
Finding J.B. The plight of the landowner is not due to circumstances unique to the
property. The property is presently vacant and the development/street layout can occur
without the need for an overlength cul-de-sac.
1.C. The circumstances were not created by the landowner;
Finding J. C. The circumstances were created by the landowner due to the desired
design and layout of the proposed public street.
1.D. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality;
and
Finding J.D. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The
recommended emergency access connection can be provided for with or without the
overlength cul-de-sac.
1.E. The problems extend beyond economic considerations. Economic
considerations do not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the
property exists under the terms of the ordinance.
Finding J.E. The considerations are not economic for this request.
Criterion 2
It has been demonstrated that a variance as requested will be in keeping with the spirit
and intent ofthis Chapter.
Finding 2 The proposed variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of Chapter 11. (Zoning).
Criterion 3
The request is not for a use variance.
Finding 3 The request for a setback variance is not a use variance.
Criterion 4
Conditions to be imposed by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals will insure compliance
to protect the adjacent properties.
Finding 4 (Not applicable since no conditions are proposed).
Criterion 5
Variances in the flood plain overlay zone also shall meet the following criteria: ......
Finding 5 (Not applicablf! since the property is not within the flood plain overlay
zone).
City Engineering has provided a memorandum (Exhibit D) recommending approval, noting a
number of conditions that shall be addressed prior to recording and construction. One specific
condition concerned the proposed overlength cul-de-sac, with staff recommending that the
length be shortened to comply with the City Design Criteria, that the lot lines at the end of
Fescue Circle be realigned, and that they work with City staff to provide an emergency access
at the end of Fescue Circle. Their recommended conditions have been incorporated into the
draft resolution.
The Building Official commented that temporary street signs are required prior to
construction.
The Shakopee Fire Inspector commented that a maximum of 100 units in this development
may be constructed without an approved second access for emergency use. The design ofthe
emergency access connection should be reviewed and approved by the Fire fuspector.
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission provided a memorandum noting that water,
underground electric and street lighting installation is available subject to their standard terms
and conditions. The applicant must pay the associated fees, and contact them regarding
installation/construction policies. Additionally, they noted that Rye Court and Switchgrass
Court watermains will have to be connected for looping purposes, and that Fescue Circle's
watermain will have to be extended through Outlot B (commercial area) of Riverside Fields
3rd Addition to County Road 18's watermain also for looping purposes.
The landscape plan approved with the preliminary plat proposed the planting of 468 trees for
the Riverside Fields development, with 306 required for mitigation. The submitted landscape
plan identifies the planting of288 trees north of Crossings Boulevard, and appears to be
generally consistent with the plan previously approved. Parks and Recreation recommended
approval of the plat, conditioned on the applicant modifying the tree replacement plan for the
Red Oak trees planned along Rye Court. Two (2) options were offered that the applicant
should explore to ensure compliance with this requirement.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve Resolution No. 6187, a resolution denying the variance request and approving
the final plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition, subjectto the conditions as proposed.
2. Approve Resolution No. 6187, a resolution denying the variance request and approving
the final plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition, subject to revised conditions.
3. Approve the variance request and Resolution No. 6187, a resolution approving the final
plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition, subject to revised conditions.
4. Deny the final plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition.
5. Table a decision in order to allow time for the applicant and/or staff to provideadditional
information.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer a motion to approve Resolution No. 6187, a resolution denying the variance and
approving the final plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition, subject to the conditions as
proposed.
~~.
Mark Noble
Planner I
RESOLUTION NO. 6187
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DENYING THE
VARIANCE FOR OVERLENGTH CUL-DE-SAC AND APPROVING THE FINAL
PLAT OF RIVERSIDE FIELDS FOURTH ADDITION
WHEREAS, Centex Homes, applicant and property owner, has made application for
Final Plat approval of RIVERSIDE FIELDS FOURTH ADDITION; and
WHEREAS, Centex Homes, applicant and property owner, has requested a variance for
an overlength cul-de-sac; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as follows:
Outlot C, RIVERSIDE FIELDS THIRD ADDITION;
WHEREAS, the Shakopee Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval
ofthe Preliminary Plat on August 7, 2003; and
WHEREAS, all required public notices regarding the public hearing were duly sent and.
posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shako pee reviewed and approved the
Preliminary Plat of Riverside Fields on August 19,2003; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee reviewed the Final Plat of
Riverside Fields Fourth Addition on February 15, 2005; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, as follows:
That the application for Variance is hereby DENIED, based on the following findings with respect to
City Code Sec. 11.89, Subd. 2, "Criteria for Granting Variances."
Criterion I
The strict enforcement of the ordinance provisions would cause undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Undue hardship means the
following:
Finding LA. The property can be put to a reasonable use under the official controls,
such that the construction of a public street could comply with the City Design
Criteria for cul-de-sac length, yet still provide the required street frontage and lot
widths for single-family lots and provide the recommended emergency access
connection.
Finding J.B. The plight of the landowner is not due to circumstances unique to the,
property. The property is presently vacant and the development/street layout can occur
without the need for an overlength cul-de-sac.
Finding J. C. The circumstances were created by the landowner due to the desired
design and layout of the proposed public street.
Finding J.D. . The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The
recommended emergency access connection can be provided for with or without the
overlength cul-de-sac.
Finding J.E. The considerations are not economic for this request.
Finding 2 The proposed variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of Chapter 11 (Zoning).
Finding 3 The request for a setback variance is not a use variance.
Finding 4 (Not applicable since no conditions are proposed).
Finding 5 (Not applicable since the property is not within the flood plain overlay
zone); and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKO PEE, MINNESOTA, as follows:
That the Final Plat ofRNERSIDE FIELDS FOURTH ADDITION is approved subject to the
following conditions:
I. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the
final plat:
A. Approval of title by the City Attorney.
B. Fescue Circle exceeds the maximum allowable length for a cul-de-sac as set
forth by the City of Shako pee's Design Criteria. The length shall be shortened
so as to comply with the requirements.
C. The lots lines at the end ofthe Fescue Circle cul-de-sac shall be realigned so as
to be more radial with the right-of-way.
D. Execution of a Developers Agreement which shall include provisions for
security for public improvements within the Final Plat, payment of engineering
review fees, and any other fees as required by the City's most current fee
schedule. .
1. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
2. Electrical system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of
the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
3. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
4. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City Engineer
and the Shakopee Public Utility Commission (SPUC) approve the Final
Construction Plans and Specifications.
5. Payment of Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges shall be made as required by
the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
6. Payment of Trunk Storm Water Charges and Trunk Storm Water
Storage and Treatment Charges shall be made as required by the most
current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
E. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer.
They shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
1. Provide a total of seventeen (17) feet of drainage and utility easement in
the rear of Lots 1-3 of Block 1.
2. Provide a total of seventeen (17) feet of drainage and utility easement in
the rear of Lot 4 of Block 1.
3. Provide a total of seventeen (17) feet of drainage and utility easement in
the rear of Lot 6 of Block 1.
F. Simultaneous to the recording of the plat, a deed restriction shall be recorded
on the following lots:
1. Block 1: Lots 1-4,7-10, 12-18,23-30,33-43,48-57 & 62.
2. Block 2: Lots 1-14.
The Deed Restriction shall appear as the following:
This conveyance is made conditioned upon and subject to the
following restriction. The Grantee, heirs, successors and assigns,
are restricted from erecting any fence or other structure within the
utility and drainage easements dedicated by plat over the above-
described property, except with the prior written consent of the City
of Shako pee. This restriction shall run in favor of and be
enforceable by the City of Shako pee.
G. The following variations are granted from the zoning code provisions:
1. 15 foot structure separations are approved for all lots, with no side yard
setback being less than 5 feet.
2. 50 foot lot width minimum requirement for all lots.
H. The applicant shall implement the use of Best Management Practices for
erosion control and stormwater management during construction.
I. The applicant shall verify that all items set forth by Todd Hubmer ofWSB &
Associates, Inc. in his letter dated September 16,2004 (Exhibit 1) have been
adequately addressed.
II. Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following conditions shall
apply:
A. Outlot A shall be incorporated into the commercial development proposed east
of Riverside Fields 4th Addition, at the time that development occurs.
B. This development shall comply with City Code Section 10.60, concerning
noise elimination and noise prevention. Responsibility for other noise
mitigation measures that may be required in the future shall rest with the
developer and/or its assigns.
C. Building construction, sewer, water service, fire protection and access will be
reviewed for code compliance at the time of building permit application(s).
D. The applicant shall work with City staff to design and provide an emergency
access (including easements) from the end of Fescue Circle through Outlot A
of Riverside Fields 4th Addition to a future drive in Outlot B of Riverside
Fields 3rd Addition.
E. Watermains to be installed in this development shall provide the necessary
looping connections, as required by Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
F. All existing easements are retained.
G. Final grading, utility connections and access to city streets will need approval
by the Engineering Department.
H. All outstanding fees will apply.
1. Temporary street signs are required prior to construction.
J. Provide a second remote access (including easements) in accordance with
International Fire Code Appendix D when the total count of lots accessing
Crossings Boulevard west of County Road 18 exceeds 100 units.
K. Landscaping shall be consistent with the submitted landscape plan, except that
the applicant shall modify the tree replacement plan for the Red Oak trees
planned along Rye Court, either by staggering the species along the cul-de-sac
to avoid having adjacent Red Oaks or by replacing the Red Oaks with another
species such as Ironwood, Blue Beech, Black Ash, Burr Oak or Swamp White
Oak.
L. The applicant should transplant healthy young trees on site whenever possible.
M. The developer shall install rain sensors for the irrigation system, and that all
sprinklers owned and operated by the Homeowner's Association shall have
rain sensors consistent with State Law requirements.
N. The applicant shall construct houses using construction materials and methods
for indoor noise mitigation.
o. The applicant shall include 6 inches of topsoil, meeting MNDOT
specifications, on the entire site.
P. Property addresses will not be released until the approved final plat is recorded
with Scott County Land Records.
Q. Provide electronic AutoCAD files of the Final Plat to the Engineering
Department.
R. Submit two (2) copies of the final plat (II" x 17"), and an electronic copy, to
the Community Development Department, as follows:
a. The final plat copies shall be labeled 'final' and include the Council
hearing approval date.
b. Submit paper copies to: Community Development Department, 129
Holmes Street South, Shakopee, MN 55379.
c. SYlld electronic copy (.dwg or .shp) to RecordedPlat@ci.shakopee.mn.us.
THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that approval ofthe Final Plat of
RIVERSIDE FIELDS FOURTH ADDITION does not constitute a representation or guarantee
by the City of Shakopee as to the amount, sufficiency or level of water service that will be
available to lots within the plat as they are developed.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
held the -----' day of , 2005.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
r~,~(\ ~
r
j
.
AG
~ N _ Subject Property
W.E
SHAKOPEE <t ...... Shakopee Boundary
COMMUNITYPRlDESlNCl: '1857 S [:J Zoning BOundal"lj
o Parcel Boundary
Final Plat Riverside Fields 4th
Addition
02/08/2005 08:33 FAX 8528367838 CEHTEX HOMES ~ UUl:/UUt;:
, 'E.~~\-Cn- ~
I:ENTEX HOMES
Minnesota Division
12701 Whtte:wllter Orlve
$u119 $00
Mlnnelonka. MN 55343
Phone:: 952-936-7633
February 8, 2005 Fax: 9S2-936-7639
Mr. Mark Noble
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street South
Shako pee, MN 55379
Re: Riverside Fields 4tt\ Addition
Dear Mr. Noble:
This letter is in response to our conversation February 7,2005 regarding a variance for the over length
cul-de-sac (Switchgrass Circle) for the above referenced project,
Centex Homes has revised the right of way at the North end of Switchgrass Circle in Riverside Fields 4th
Addition. The continuous right of way will allow the city to access to the adjacent property in case of an
emergency. Centex Homes and Shakopee Crossings Commercial would prefer to construct the cul-de-sac
with the emergency connection be via a bituminous path with knock down bollards to prevent the
commercial traffic from using Switchgrass Circle. By granting the right of way we would consider
Switchgrass Circle a thru street and not a cui-de sac.
Thank you for your attention to this matter, and if you have any questIons, or require any addItIonal
information, please call me at 952..912.5441.
Sincerely,
Ryan Lewis
-'-K
"...,...,
,
~
Centex Homes
~\~\,... D
City of Shakopee
Memorandum
TO: Mark Noble, Planner I
FROM: Joe Swentek, Project Engineer
SUBJECT: Final Plat - Riverside Fields 4th Addition
PID NO.: 27-366066-1
CASE NO.: 05022
DATE: February 9, 2005
The application indicates a Final Plat request for a single-family residential development to be
located in Outlot C of the Riverside Fields 3rd Addition.
After reviewing the above referenced application, we have the following comments for the
applicant and the planning department:
General
1. Execution of a Developer's Agreement, which shall include provisions for security for
public improvements within the Final Plat and the engineering reviewfees.
2. Payment of Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges shall be made, as required by the most current
City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
3. Payment of Trunk Storm Water Charges and Trunk Storm Water Storage and Treatment
Charges shall be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
4. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City Engineer and the Shakopee
Public Utility Commission (SPUC) approve the Final Construction Plans and
Specifications.
5. Provide electronic (AutoCAD) files of the Final Plat to the engineering department.
Final Plat
1. Fescue Circle exceeds the maximum allowable length for a cul-de-sac as set forth by the
City of Shakopee's Design Criteri(;l.' The length shall be shortened so as to comply with
the requirements.
c: IDocuments alld SeuingslMNoblelLocal SeltingslTemporary Internet FilesIOLK9\FinaJ.Plat.Review.Riverside.Fields.4th J .doc
Page I 0(2
2. The applicant shall work with City staff to provide emergency access from the end of
Fescue Circle to Outlot B of Riverside Fields 3rd Addition.
3. The lots lines at the end of the Fescue Circle cul-de-sac shall be realigned so as to be
more radial with the right-of-way.
4. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They shall
include, but not be limited to, the following:
. Provide a total of seventeen (17) feet of drainage and utility easement in the rear of
Lots 1-3 of Block 1.
. Provide a total of seventeen (17) feet of drainage and utility easement in the rear of
Lot 4 of Block 1.
. Provide a total of seventeen (17) feet of drainage and utility easement in the rear of
Lot 6 of Block 1.
5. Simultaneous to the recording of the plat, a deed restriction shall be recorded on the
following lots:
. Block 1: Lots 1-4, 7-10, 12-18,23-30,33-43,48-57 & 62
. Block 2: Lots 1-14
The Deed Restriction shall appear as the following:
This conveyance is made conditioned upon and subject to the following restriction. The
Grantee, heirs, successors and assigns, are restricted from erecting any fence or other
structure within the utility and drainage easements dedicated by plat over the above-
described property, except with the prior written consent of the City of Shakopee. This
restriction shall run in favor of and be enforceable by the City of Shakopee.
Storm Water Management Plan
The applicant shall verify all items set forth by Todd Hubmer (WSB & Associates, Inc.) in his
letter dated September 16, 2004 have been adequately addressed.
Recommendation
Engineering staff recommends approval subject to the comments listed above being addressed by
the applicant prior to recording of the Final Plat.
C:iDocumenlS and SeuingsiMNoble\Local SellingsiTemporary Inlemel FilesIOLK9\FinaI.Pla..Review.Riverside.FieldsAlh I.doc
Page 2 or2
A e-lC~\~\T 1
WSB
& Associates, Inc. September 16,2004
Mr. Joe Swentek
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street S.
Shakopee,1{N 55379
Re: Riverside Fields 3rd Addition
Review of Grading Plan and Storm Sewer System
WSB Project No. 1281-76
Dear Mr. Swentek:
We have reviewed the construction drawings and grading plan for the above-referenced project.
In particular, we have reviewed the following plans related to this particular request:
. Grading Construction Plans for Riverside Fields 3rd Addition development - dated
08/20/04, received 08/24/04.
. Stonnwater Management Plan, Riverside 'Fields 3rd Addition - dated 08/20104, received
08/24/04.
Based on our review ofthe final plans and calculations, we offer the following detailed
comments related to this application: ,
1. Extend catch basin south on Rye Court to Station 3+50 to capture additional drainage
discharging from the south.
2. The site appears to discharge into a flood prone area as identified in the City stonnwater
management plan. Please reduce discharge from site to 0.1 cfs per acre for the lOa-year
24-hour event. The hydrologic modeling information for the project indicates that
under proposed conditions, 24 acres will discharge into proposed north pond and off site
to the northeast.
3. It is not clear from the information provided if wetlands are located on site. Please
identify any delineated wetlands on grading plan.
4. Confirm invert elevation of 24-inch RCP located in northwest portion of site. Previous
development plans in the vicinity identify invert elevation at 748.69. Please also
confirm that the ultimate outlet for this development will be incorporated into the Blue
4150 Olson Lake watershed storm sewer tnmk system discharging to the west.
Memorial Highway 5. Verify exfiItration rate used in hydrologic calculations for north pond.
Suite 300
Minneapolis 6. Identify conveyanceway direction, capacity and ponding location for areas draining to
Minnesota the south in the southeast corner of the proposed development.
55422
763.541.4800
.,
763.541.1700 FAX Minneapolis. st. Cloud, Equal Opportunity Employer F:\WPWIMl 281 -76\091 504-b/.doc
'E"+l' f!:t ,,- L
Mr. Joe Swentek
September 16, 2004
Page 2
7. Widen emergency overflow located between Lots 33 and 34, Block 1, to 30 feet in
width to allow 1: 1.5 sideslopes on spillway into north pond.
8. Identify hydraulic parameters for emergency overflow overtopping Crossings
Boulevard at Station 18+50 and ultimately discharging into Proposed North Pond
through drainage swale located between Rye Court and Switchgrass Court.
9. Confirm cumulative off site area discharging to catch basins 404 and 501/503. The
detailed Micro drainage area map does not clearly identify all areas discharging to these
structures.
If you have any questions or items you wish to discuss, please contact me at (763) 287-7128.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
~(~
Todd Hubmer, P.E. /-<1:}-
Water Resource Engineer
cc: Bruce Loney, City of Shakopee
Doug Stahl - Pioneer Engineering
Jeff Weyandt, Pioneer Engineering
Phil Belfiori - WSB & Associates, Inc.
F:\WPWIM1281-76\091504-bl.doc
// jI'\lCCL "oe. f:i, C~. Pn.&!' '-I M , t-JA."-" PL.A-r-
, / ^ \ TOTAL AREA 79.8209 ACRES
r"'~
-< " .J/ \ TOTAL R.O.W. AREA _ _ _'4.3475 ACRES
r<j" ' "q, TOT",- LOT MEA -57.2052 ACRES
h) / .
(" f'lv . TOTAL CUlLOT AREA 8.2572 ACRES
-' ~'...S-<, / ~ \ TOTAL CUlLOlS __ __2
'- \ /' C
,/' 'Q v NUMBER OF' LOlS _ '"
,-'1:' .-/' ,\~, \ ~ARGEST LOT (RESIDENTIAL) 49,497 SO. FT.
,-C... ,\.-/' ',J
(~o.!J -.:; -' '; ~ \ SMALLES T LOT (RESlDENnAL) _5.640 SQ. FT.
,-,'~
--- - \) AVERACE ~OT (RESIDENTIAL) _11.810 SQ. FT.
(,r; r r
...0 \ V"'" --- ,"' v '" 0 ~o 100 200 GROSS DENSITY (EXCl.UDES OUlL015. ~DT 34. B~K. 2 Ie ~OT 65, BU<. .) _-3.4 RESIOENnAL ~OTS/AC.
,....';1:'" --- " ,(\ I ., I
SO'v ':..:- .,.. ': 65 "'~ V, NET DENSITY (EXCLUDES CUll.015. R/W. ~OT 34. BLK. 2 '" LOT 65. eu<. I) _4.4 RESIDENnA~ ~015/AC.
",\ \ JaUHsr '" .. ~/ '
- " " ...6-~ r./;' ~ " GRAPlllC SCALE IN FEET ZONING PRO
rev ~~ ",;/.... ')-'"
'" .t.p- ;/;", 'J. -^, ununES AVAII.ABLE
1\ ,~/", /,<,'>..':,
:...'("/;; ':' '" I,"
,., ", #/ ... .....1"
~ ,,';\'. /0....., I reAL rn:'~r.RIFI"nN rm PRF'IIUINARY PI Ai PURF'O!=iF.!=\ ONI Y
. ."\ - <,
.... ~ .. \...J. "" " All thal port of the Northwest Ouarter 01 Section 13. Township 115. Range. 2.0. Scott County
r</ ~ MinnuotQ l)'ing southwllsleny of Ih~ :!IDt1thwllst right ofwoy line 01 County Stole "'Ida Highway No.
... j"....r5l 18 4nd toul/tt'osterlyof the .Duth~CJsJ rJgh1 of way Jlne 0.1 Counly Road No.2!.
..... C~~
- Cb, ..... '1''0, .,.~::..~ ,'j
(.~ J;"'^ / r:'" <---
'.~", "" <," /_C;",' "(" PREPARED BY PIONEER ENGINEERING. PA.
,- . /.,() <.'v""
V(Y'J'-'/ JOHN C. LARSON
~:'>. rP REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
'--7, \. '''0 "(' 19828
<", REG. NO.
I~)
'-' >.
.....,", "
ti~, ...........~
, ....... '<;...')
.0,
, "" ,,,
,../:~ ... .. I
1;\. "0.,
.... " '>1.'- .....'.' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
~ ~17"~4" -)'/_ ..... EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS:
8 "44 II
~18lt.1JO~ U'J e.A1sr " . -t
121 128 ,,1/ '" 5 II
'0
....g~97~5F' 1:1 10 6.08tsr24c:o r;:;45'~"" ..... " H"
"" ~ ~ .. ..... - " -
tl8 liS" 0 125 ~ ,., _____J____.J L____l_____
il20',""''' Sl ..""2'>: ,-",... "'46'''''' Sl~ ....."49~ :;;,3'''''' ...-... 116 ".r \.
liB liB'" ~ 126 1Z6 11,3 '\.
: ,.., 7.1161 Sf' ~ein9 5 leet in wj~th. .on~ adjoining lot
.., <It' 7:551 sr <of" 7Me SF <of" 8.050 sr ....:e 1I.J21 sr.., 0 7,531!T 7.7&9!1';: ,.. "" Imes unless otherWise Indicated. and
'" "'21' "'. 22 '" 47 '" 48 '" ~ 14, 5 15 33111 10 feel in width and adjoining street
12!l 118 118 60 126 124 60 I 112 I 60 lines and rear lot lines unless otherwise
, '" indicated on 1heplot.
~ CROSSING <, BOULEVARD
~ 0'
~ m 118 liS 125 '25 "5 toS \0 60 126 '...
~ 60 83 82 eo 0 60 of' ".10) Ill'''' tD "-
" on on ,o.lt II. \1'1 ,"0:1, . n ~ 0 1,lIn ~. I\. 9 10.01.) 'If., tt. ID ~ IO.IOt tq. It. a'I l0.0n Iq. n, II) 10 G'I ,", ,
CD IlI.B2J Iq. fI, 10 G) "'" CD...'. ... IIlI 10 - 1 65 to 64 co 48 ~ c..l
8 12>' Zl "6 116 !!I 124 125 141 '" 116 125... I.'"'' ..,......._ ",
~ <l ~ Z 9 2 ~ ~ '" 46 l:: '.
\1'1 ~ 0::141 ,,,,_ It! 'lenS' '" W :2 &.D1$9':g tllUsr:g W :;: 7.788sr 1/'1 1,1l~)sr '" ~ 1fJ tl1U!;":2 156 ""
IP ".02!J9" . (.) en . 7 /0. 10 > > 66 to 6310 ~ 49
2 ~ :r:d '" 84 12\ ". Bl <( '24 125 <( 120 OIS 0 125 5 m
/:;!Ct: a: 8 3 Ct: 62 0:: ~ ..." ".4 '" \.
~o 0 I/"l U') ~ tn LOSS!; V) &112. sr ~ W If) 7.eos sr Il'l 714& sr If) W In 1t,12S sr 153 '.
It'J 112105F' Ul 7,'129" l.O 0 to to ~ "" <D' "",: c.D50
~' 85 ,>1 "S BO It 124 126 ~ 67120 ". g 125 .....
Z 7 4 z 61 t. \.
g 7.f1~sr.:2 ~ ~ J,03151" :g 4 1L2msr * ~ l2 7,&011&9' ~ 1.Il40St l2 ~ :251 e.S049" 'loeP .
79 12J 127 68121 117 t) \47 "-
118 "-
78 ~ :; 6 5 ~ :; 1413sr In 60 \It - ~
~ G,3'lI4 SF ...n.... 11.7~1I sr"", I.Ute!T 69' <0 7.Il'3] sr ""
2 I~ 117
D" 0.' "59'" r---;;-n-T-------,
65 65 1.llllsr .. I ~O. t" I I
fJ I p"O l ;:-~'( I . I
\19 - 100 ~'I ,.< I
! ~~~_~i~'~J III
' , ,
~ I" I " I
J ;-.:, ,-...:: I
, ' I ' I
\ or, I'" <. I
....~ -\ 'IT ~"...."" I C~l"'"
- '.. " ,.., .) "
JJ2.2!.8sr (I .9.'" '7 I I I
~ L I '
,<'.' -_____u_u--!
,
~ SECTION t 3. TWP _ 115. RGE, 20
247 LOCA TION MAP
NO SC~
UUj N
~7r\::""I"1 11/,.-'...... ^ t""'\i'\.!"Tj"1\J _ I
I J..\-'..;.......rll ,c_:.; rlL/UJ I/VI" ;~; =-::lr1, II I/Ii;:)r:~':.-
I ...... '-" r\r \\J, !.._L-
*'.... * * ~ ~ ,) "'"SEa .,e,,, e; WAYS (, La' UNES I
0/< PlDNE..." ,
)f. ~ln"'lng~" . '~=a::'M1ll1 , htl"~by cUlofy 11\01 1hi!! plon wo, prepor~d DY me 01" LJ"~t my dlteel !lame 1~1:~:~;::8-i'-03 Oat'! lJ-5-0:l SHEE'i Tl1L-b OWNEP.. PRO..~C'
*4*'<< -""-~..;.::..-=~~)~,..:;~- '",....;'"a".I"""'ma."'y"';"~.dP..'.."~a'E"'..'''".... 0.,,,,,,.. RELlMINARY PLAT RYLAND HOMES RIVERSIDE FIELDS 7 SHEETS
---- ~::..,::t'.7U-1I&J {/'Ie 10",3 (tf th~ Sto!~ 01 ')jnne"o!o r<e'l. tic _ 001" Oto...r,
"
--....--- ..... ,- --
RIVERSIDE, FIELDS ,4TH ADDITION. e )(.~\~ \T'"' c...
AREA SKETCH
AREA SUMMARY
TOTAL LOT A'REA =' 12.2588 lJeres
Ou TOTAL OUTLOT ,A.REA = 0.0365' acres
TOTAL RIGHT-OF~WA,( AREA = 2.8719 acres
/; TOTAL ,AREA = 15.1672 acres
"{OJ-
9.':': -<J
I
I
I
I
I
I
36
7.518 sq, fl.
13
10,009 sq,fl.
\ I-
~
::>
0
14 u
7 9,11~ sq. ft. t:l
6.244 sq.ft, '<(
CJ::
0
6 15 is
6.059 sq,fl. 7,685 sq. fl. J.c;;;.
~
C/)
5 16
6.045 sq, ft.
7,192 sq,n,
4 f- 17
a::
1:.,045 sQ.fl. ::>
0 6,681 sq.fl.
<.)
3 w 48 12
>- 18 6.036 sq, n,
6.04.;5 sq.ft, a:: 6.173 sq. n. ,6.505 sq.fl.
2 19 22 44 13
47 6,366 SQ.ft.
5,045 sQ.it.. 5.967 sQ.ft. 6,485 sq,f\, 6,5~2 sq.rl.
6.717 5Q.ft.
1 46 14
7,859 sq. H, 20 21 45 7.22;; SQ. ft 7,683 sq.fL
7,458 :;q.fl "i.40':' !:q.fl. 8,008 sq n
PI: NEERengineering
t:l\'Il.r:.r,I~lrr:f!$ 1..\~IOl'I.MISFJI~ I.MIllSIlI{\'I,WI:;.'. LA~;o~r."'f'r:^nCllnH:T:'I
...
R I VE R S I D E F I E L D S " 4 TH ADD I TI 0 N KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESEf,ITS: Thol Cent., Homes. a Nevada generaf partnership.
- - - - -.- - - - - - -,. .'. . . . f~.e owner of lh~ following described properly situaLed in the Count)' of Scott, Stot~ Ctf
r COUtli( RD . I . I .. Minnesota. to' Wtt:
/110.21 . . . .'
I,' I I
I ~,.. t I 'Outlot C. RIVERSIDE: FIELDS 3RO AODITIQt.I., according to the recorded plot thereof. Scott County,
, ~ ,,/ I ~'.:'=" ~\.:~ 'i" Minn'esolo.' . '. . .. .
Si!E '- Has caused the some to be surveyed and plottetJ os RIVERSIDE FIELDS 4TH ADDlTtt)1'l ond does
I I hereb}' dedicate to the public for public use forever th'!. Courts and CirCloe. ond ols(/ dedicol~s the
~' / 1,1l~' "\,.', ' , I easements os shown-on "this plot for drainage ond u\Hity.'purposes onty.
C,oSS"'05 . "'. + ~ II
eO~U;:V"'fiD ----- -----1 f'
I I I 'n witness wher.eof said Centex Homes. 0 Nevada general p ortnership, hos causad thes~ prl!sents
I I f to be signed by Centell . Reol Estate Corpora lion. 0 Nevada corporation. its monogin9 general
I :-OUI -1\' I ::::,=.,\...1 I portner this _ day of. . 20 _'
..,),Yf 1\~ _l... J \ r ..
I I I 8Y: Centex -Reol Eslate Corporation
I I I Its: . Managing Go;onc:rol Partnl!f
L_____-L_____-1 L) I BY:. '
SECTION 13, TV/P. 115. RGE. 22 J \ IS: r.-; Scott J. Ri(;hter, Division President
LOCATION MAP L-
110 SCALE. STATE OF'
~ COUNTY OF
Th9: foregoing instrument was aCknowledged before me this _ do)' cd
20-, byScottJ. Richter, Division President, on behalf of Centex Real Estate
Corporation, (J Nevoda corp9rotiQn, its managing general portner of Cent.e:t Homes, 0 Nevada
general partnership. .
No10ry Publi<: County.
M~' C~mmh~sion E:<~ires
.1 hereby eer1ify thot I hove surveyed and plotted the propert.y .deseriboed on this plot o~
RIVERSIDE FIELDS 4TH ADDITlON, thot this plot is 0 cOrrE~cl representation of the survey; thot
011 distances ore correctly shown on the plot ili feet and hundredths of 0 foot: that 011
monuments hove been correctly placed in the grouno os' shown, or will be correctly.placed in
the ground os designated: thot the outside boundary lines ore correctly designated on the
plot; and that there ore no wetlqnds os defined in Minnesota Stotutes, Section 505.02. Subd.
1, or public highways to be desig'no.ted olher ihan .os Sh.own:
John C. Lorson, Professional Land Surveyor
Minnes~to License No. 19828 .
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
The foregoing Surveyor's C~r1jfkote wos ocknowledQeod before me this _ do.", .of.
20 -.-0. by John C: Larson, Professional Land Surveyor, Minnesota Ucense No. 19626
'.lolor.y. PUblic County, Minnesota.
My Commission .ElIp"ires
~ CIl'( ArrORf~EY. CITY OF SHAI<OPEE.l.flNNESOTA
d . .
,... f hereby certify thot.t have exomined this plot of RtVERSIDE FIELDS 4TH ADDITION ond dc,
hereby recomm~nd this plot for opprovel os to form this _ do)' of
20_, '
., Cit.y Attorney. Shokopee, Minnesota
~ CITY COUNCIL. CITY OF SHAJ{OPEE. MINI/ESOT A
~ ,
rxi This plot of RIVERSIDE FIELDS 4TH. ADDITION wos approved and accepted by the City Council
L() of the City of Shokopee. Mirinesota,ot 0 regular meeting thereof herd this _
-.::t' day of 20---:....... ond pursuont to !.l.S,A.' 505.03,'
sub. 2. we ore in c:onformance.
r - - "I Moyor Clerk
1<') 01 5 18
'~I 10 scorr COUNT'! SURVEYOR
" on '"
111 UJ~2:~~'~ _1.fO~Q..J I'. Pursuont to Minnesota Slalute!), Chopter 389.09. - Subd. 1, os amended. this .plot ho~ been
l$ reviewed and approved thi:; day of . 20 _.
... r "I r S89'SO'37':W ' " ,
~ 81 4 I~ 81e> 1, '" ' 'B-/
~ gj I~ VI: . Scot.t County.Surveyor
z,!JJ 1'189'50'37"E 120.90 . OJ ~
w;..r, l!: - - - - - - _:.J _ -1 \ ;'; ~C\/ SCOTT cOUl.trr AUDITOR/TREASURER
~ ~ 16 r-- I rSB'9'50'37"W 128,51,'] liS,2/", '5'~~ ;~ I hereby <.rlHy that the <urrenl and delinauenl la,es on the lands described wilhin aro paid and
o g ~ I 3 I~ ~I . 18 :II .~fJf"" 1.2 ~he tronsrer it: entered this ---:....- doy of __ 20_.
~ b :fi I /:g ~I / . .
~ ~ l!:!~~~'L - !.?.O~O.J I' _ 60 30 0 60 Signed by Depuly
~ r I r589'SO'37"W - ',' ":: l1a:9'91 I, I
\ 0 I 2 18 81 ' '( 13 I~ I S I . F t scon COUNT"! RECOROER
...... ~ ci. ,'r7.68 ~/ I r- CO e In ee
g I, 110 :g, c.=OI'59'26~ ~"'.J I I hero:by certify thot this plot wos fil~d in thi:; office this _ doyef
l!:!~SS!:3..z:'S- - ~.o~O-.J L ..J\ .:W 20 _ ot ~ o'dock. --.:..- U. os Document No. .
r .., _ _ rs89'SO'37"W 119.331 f=r S89'SQ'37"\'/ 119.74J;"'! ~Ir 126.78 569'50':37"\'1 I ~rN89'50'37"E 122.19 -, fj
I 1 (, 10 ,,0 00 01 lo::ll ,...'~ ::;/.. 45 30 I _ .",1", 'I;;; ~ Seatt County Recorder
~ I _J I~ 11~1 20 IIli.OII 21 ::11f'J 30 I 30 ,,0 ;<~~ 14 r~:-
:g I ,:2, ~I I~ ~I '.ol~ I ~11O . . 1(0 g
15L .J I L -l ZL ..J<l ,I <)L________...J z
--i2o~o-- 30.00 30.00 --11"9."3'3-- .1 --i6~84-- 30.00 30.00 30.00. 30.00 123.19 _ _ 8EARlUGS ARE BASED ~H WEST llflE or THE "IORTliWEST
, NS9'SO'37"E 915.26 ~~A~Z~ ~'B~;~if'I~\~\";OOI'~;'2~~~ 22 WHICH IS I,SSUIAEO
, r. c> n. . , ", I r, , .::; .'" " , :-" ^' i:> '" '0 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
- I '" "~ " v -.c -.c I ,. " , t, 'J '..J L 'I"" L) '" EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS'
_? J '0 . '- . - , , . . 0 OEt-IOTES 1 '2 IJoICH BY 14 IJoIr.H IROI,I MOf'IIJI.~Ef.JT
C=J~ ! I SO At-JD I),ARI<ED 8"( UCEIlSE rJUM8Ep. 19825.
g"g:-~ - - _ -_ !;i-I
~o F=-- - - -- - -- - -l r- --'1 'r- I I
~ , W 1/4 COR, SEC, 1.;, 60 I 00 , I--s JoIO 1,'Of~VI.'EI.JT SYMBOL SHOVM AT Al-I'( STATUTE
I WE. 115, RGE. 22 . ("j 1 r") . 2 ~ REOUIRED LOCATION, II-lDIC/\TES " PLAT
\ I -- (fllD sccm CQ, C,f,i,' I ('", I I (;" I I 1, Jl MONUl.1Et-lT THAT WILL B~ SET ACCORD1I4G 70
.... ............ ;r J; _____L____f L_____ ___ f.{ll-JNESOT/\ ST/\TUC$ AND WHICH SHALL BE III
@~ :. :. ~ t. Pl.".CC WITH1~J ONE YEAR OF 1Hf~ FIUt.IG OF" THe
,. : -11\ Ir--j--lr."- I IJ:" LIJ I ,-,r-, r',~"" ')r, w-. I 1J':: LLJ I /I r'lr\I'Ir\h I I I PL:AT. SAID M01,JUMENTS SH/~lL 8t: 1/'::. B.JCH :':
I I r\l v C'J-\:;It...IL.. I :::::;::. I /- IL.L.U....;: ~1'jLJ ~_':;:;:~ nLlLJl1 IVI 'I I 14 1I.1CH IRQ": MO:.1UMUITS l,lARKED BY LICENse
~ ! I ::: ~c :::"'~C BEING 5 FEET II,! WIDTH, AII[, ADJOII'III'IG SIDE HUMBER ;9828,
f!'::::-<. :,) _..: () _..: LOT lIHES UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICP,TED. MiD
iili>: r~ ~ - I :~ - I iO FEET II'J WIDTH AND AD.JOINING STREET
~g I , I -,. ~~ LINES MID REAP LOT LIt'l[S UNLESS OTHERWISE PI.. NEER '. .
v.: S~' CO~< SE~, 1~" 1 (,~ Cl ItIDIC;"TED OJ.! THE FUT ~ . engzneerlng
. I "-. ", ,.. -. I I ,,,._._, ~.__ U"'""'_' "'_"0"_'
\...:::'___- (FI.ll) IPI