HomeMy WebLinkAbout15.D.1. Final Plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition-Res. No. 6187-tabled 3/1
CITY OF SHAKOPEE Js. o. } ,
Memorandum
CASELOG NO.: 05-022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Mark Noble, Planner I /
SUBJECT: Final Plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition
MEETING DATE: March 15,2005
REVIEW PERIOD: December 24, 2004 to April 22, 2005
INTRODUCTION: /
I
Centex Homes has submittedi;!lY"application for final plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition, located
north of Crossings Boulevard, and west ofthe 3rd Addition and future commercial development
along CSAH 18 (Exhibit A). This property is presently legally described as Outlot C, Riverside Fields
3 rd Addition, and has an area of 15.17 acres, and would consist of three (3) streets with 76 single-
family residential lots. This item was tabled at the February 15, 2005 meeting and again at the March
I, 2005 meeting to allow staff and the applicant additional time to review design issues.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The submitted final plat is generally consistent with the approved preliminary plat, except that they
have requested a variance to allow Fescue Circle to be constructed as an overlength cul-de-sac
(Exhibit B), rather than as a street that loops back to Crossings Boulevard along the commercial
development proposed adjacent to County Road 18 (Exhibit C). The developers ofthese projects
have proposed an emergency access connection between Fescue Circle and the commercial
development for public safety vehicles. At the February 3, 2005 Planning Commission meeting, the
Commission reviewed a PUD Concept Plan for that commercial development, and recommended
that the commercial and residential projects develop without a street connection (they did support an
emergency access connection). However, their recommendation only addressed the street layout,
and that the overlength cuHle-sac request was not part oftheir discussion.
The City's Fire Inspector has commented that a shorter emergency connection is more desirable
from a fire safety and access perspective. He has provided a memorandum (Exhibit D) that
addresses his recommendation concerning the proposed emergency fire apparatus access road,
noting that ifthe plat is approved, the design, installation, maintenance and easement agreements of
this emergency access road shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Inspector. The developer
has submitted a plan (Exhibit E) which shows the design and specifications of the proposed access
road. The Shakopee Fire Inspector also commented that a maximum of 100 units in this
development may be constructed without an approved second access for emergency use.
Joe Swentek, Project Engineer, has provided a memorandum (Exhibit F) recommending approval of
the final plat, noting a number of conditions that shall be addressed prior to recording and
construction. One specific condition concerned the proposed overlength cul-de-sac, with staff
recommending denial of the variance, and that the length be shortened to comply with the City
Design Criteria. Additionally, he recommended that the lot lines at the end of Fescue Circle be
realigned, and that the developer work with City staffto provide an emergency access at the end of
Fescue Circle. The recommended conditions have been incorporated into the draft resolution.
Planning staff commented that the City's sewer plan contemplates that the adjacent "Riverside
Bluffs" area (the property just west of Riverside Fields 4th Addition) would be served by sanitary
sewer extended from the Prior Lake Interceptor to the west, through the former Eagle Creek Stables
property, and then to the south to serve the areas on the south side of CR 16. In the event that the
Council chooses to allow Riverside Bluffs to be served by a connection to Riverside Fields, it
should be conditioned on 1) the developer being responsible for all costs of installation,
maintenance, and future removal of the connection, and 2) a clear understanding that service to the
south will only become available once the Prior Lake Interceptor connection is made.
Bruce Loney, Public Works Director, provided a memorandum (Exhibit G) that addresses the
sanitary sewer issue, noting that Engineering staff is recommending that the extension of temporary
sewer be denied since the permanent sewer may be available in a year or two. Mr. Loney noted in
his memorandum the number of issues that need to be resolved prior to approval of the Riverside
Bluffs plat. If the Council were to approve the temporary sewer extension, it should be contingent
on compliance with the conditions outlined in Mr. Loney's memorandum.
Planning staff notes that the applicant is presently discussing the sanitary sewer service connection
issue with the proposed developer of Riverside Bluffs. There currently is not a provision for this
connection to occur in Riverside Fields, and at this time there is not a final resolution to this issue
between the developers; however, staff has determined that this is not a reason to deny the Riverside
Fields 4th Addition Final Plat request.
Chris Enger, Ryland Homes, has submitted a letter (Exhibit H) addressing the proposed sewer
connection, requesting that the sewer connection be left in the approved plans for Riverside Fields
4th Addition, with several reasons supporting the request. Mark Themig. Parks. Recreation, and
Facilities Director, provided a memorandum (Exhibit I) that addresses an incorrect statement in Mr.
Enger's letter. Additionally, it should be noted that the Planning Commission did review the
Riverside Bluffs Preliminary Plat at their March 3, 2005 meeting, but that they continued the public
hearing to the April 7, 2005 meeting, citing the need for comments to be received from the
Environmental Advisory Committee, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, and other reviewing
agencIes.
The Building Official commented that temporary street signs are required prior to construction.
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission provided a memorandum noting that water, underground
electric and street lighting installation is available subject to their standard terms and conditions.
The applicant must pay the associated fees, and contact them regarding installation/construction
policies. Additionally, they noted that Rye Court and Switchgrass Court watermains will have to be
connected for looping purposes, and that Fescue Circle's watermain will have to be extended
through Outlot B (commercial area) of Riverside Fields 3rd Addition to County Road 18's
watermain also for looping purposes.
The landscape plan approved with the preliminary plat proposed the planting of 468 trees for the
Riverside Fields development, with 306 required for mitigation. The submitted landscape plan
identifies the planting of 288 trees north of Crossings Boulevard, and appears to be generally
consistent with the plan previously approved. Parks and Recreation recommended approval of the
plat, conditioned on the applicant modifying the tree replacement plan for the Red Oak trees
planned along Rye Court. Two (2) options were offered that the applicant should explore to ensure
compliance with this requirement.
Utilizing the information provided by the applicant and the numerous reviewing agencies, staff have
reviewed the criteria for granting a variance, and have prepared findings as noted below.
FINDINGS
Section 11.89, Subd. 2, of the City Code contains provisions for the granting of variances only if all of
the following circumstances are found to exist. Staff has provided draft findings on each criterion.
The City Council may use or modify these draft findings as it sees fit:
Criterion I
The strict enforcement of the ordinance provisions would cause undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Undue hardship means
the following:
1.A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under
conditions allowed by the official controls;
Finding 1.A. The property can be put to a reasonable use under the official controls, such
that the construction of a public street could comply with the City Design Criteria for cul-
de-sac length, yet still provide the required street frontage and lot widths for single-family
lots and provide the recommended emergency access connection.
1.B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property;
Finding 1.B. The plight of the 'landowner is not due to circumstances unique to the property.
The property is presently vacant and the development/street layout can occur without the need
for an overlength cul-de-sac.
1.C. The circumstances were not created by the landowner;
Finding J.e The circumstances were created by the landowner due to the desired design and
layout of the proposed public street.
1.D. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and
Finding 1.D. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The
recommended emergency access connection can be providedfor with or without the overlength
cul-de-sac.
1.E. The problems extend beyond economic considerations. Economic considerations
do not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the
terms of the ordinance.
Finding i.E. The considerations are not economic for this request.
Criterion 2
It has been demonstrated that a variance as requested will be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of this Chapter.
Finding 2 The proposed variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of
Chapter 11 (Zoning).
Criterion 3
The request is not for a use variance.
Finding 3 The request for a setback variance is not a use variance.
Criterion 4
Conditions to be imposed by the City Council will insure compliance to protect the adjacent
properties.
Finding 4 (Not applicable since no conditions are proposed).
Criterion 5
Variances in the flood plain overlay zone also shall meet the following criteria: ......
Finding 5 (Not applicable since the property is not within the flood plain overlay zone).
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve Resolution No. 6187, a resolution denying the variance request and approving the final
plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition, subject to the conditions as proposed.
2. Approve Resolution No. 6187, a resolution denying the variance request and approving the final
plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition, subject to revised conditions.
3. Approve the variance request and Resolution No. 6187, a resolution approving the final plat of
Riverside Fields 4th Addition, subject to revised conditions.
4. Deny the final plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition.
5. Table a decision in order to allow time for the applicant and/or staffto provide additional
information.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer a motion to approve Resolution No. 6187, a resolution denying the variance and approving the
final plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition, subject to the conditions as proposed. Ifthe Council
determines the cul-de-sac length variance should be granted, it should approve the resolution with
reVISIons.
RESOLUTION NO. 6187
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DENYING THE V ARIANCEFOR
OVERLENGTH CUL-DE-SAC AND APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF RIVERSIDE FIELDS
FOURTH ADDITION
WHEREAS, Centex Homes, applicant and property owner, has made application for Final Plat
approval of RIVERSIDE FIELDS FOURTH ADDITION; and
WHEREAS, Centex Homes, applicant and property owner, has requested a variance for an overlength
cul-de-sac; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as follows:
Outlot C, RIVERSIDE FIELDS THIRD ADDITION;
WHEREAS, the Shakopee Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the
Preliminary Plat on August 7,2003; and
WHEREAS, all required public notices regarding the public hearing were duly sent and posted and all
persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee reviewed and approved the Preliminary Plat of
Riverside Fields on August 19,2003; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shako pee reviewed the Final Plat of Riverside Fields
Fourth Addition on February 15, 2005, March I, 2005, and March 15,2005; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, as follows:
That the application for Variance is hereby DENIED, based on the following findings with respect to City Code
Sec. 11.89, Subd. 2, "Criteria for Granting Variances."
Criterion I
The strict enforcement of the ordinance provisions would cause undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Undue hardship means the
following:
Finding l.A. The property can be put to a reasonable use under the official controls, such that
the construction of a public street could comply with the City Design Criteria for cul-de-sac length,
yet still provide the required street frontage and lot widths for single-family lots and provide the
recommended emergency access connection.
Finding l.B. The plight of the landowner is not due to circumstances unique to the property. The
property is presently vacant and the development/street layout can occur without the need for an
overlength cul-de-sac.
Finding J.c. The circumstances were created by the landowner due to the desired design and layout
of the proposed public street.
Finding J.D. The variance would not alter the. essential character of the locality. The
recommended emergency access connection can be provided for with or without the overlength cul-de-
sac.
Finding J.E. The considerations are not economic for this request.
Finding 2 The proposed variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of Chapter
11 (Zoning).
Finding 3 The request for a setback variance is not a use variance.
Finding 4 (Not applicable since no conditions are proposed).
Finding 5 (Not applicable since the property is not within the flood plain overlay zone); and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA, as follows:
That the Final Plat of RIVERSIDE FIELDS FOURTH ADDITION is approved subject to the following
conditions:
I. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the final plat:
A. Approval of title by the City Attorney.
B. Fescue Circle exceeds the maximum allowable length for a cul-de-sac as set forth by the
City of Shakopee's Design Criteria. The length shall be shortened so as to comply with the
requirements.
C. The lots lines at the end of the Fescue Circle cul-de-sac shall be realigned so as to be more
radial with the right-of-way.
D. Execution of a Developers Agreement which shall include provisions for security for public
improvements within the Final Plat, payment of engineering review fees, and any other fees
as required by the City's most current fee schedule.
1. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission.
2. Electrical system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
3. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission.
4. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City Engineer and the
Shakopee Public Utility Commission (SPUC) approve the Final Construction Plans
and Specifications.
5. Payment of Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges shall be made as required by the most
current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
6. Payment of Trunk Storm Water Charges and Trunk Storm Water Storage and
Treatment Charges shall be made as required by the most current City of Shakopee
Fee Schedule.
E. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They shall
include, but not be limited to, the following:
1. Provide a total of seventeen (17) feet of drainage and utility easement in the rear of
Lots 1-3 of Block 1.
2. Provide a total of seventeen (17) feet of drainage and utility easement in the rear of
Lot 4 of Block 1.
3. Provide a total of seventeen (17) feet of drainage and utility easement in the rear of
Lot 6 of Block 1.
F. Simultaneous to the recording of the plat, a deed restriction shall be recorded on the
following lots:
1. Block 1: Lots 1-4, 7-10, 12-18,23-30,33-43,48-57 & 62.
2. Block 2: Lots 1-14.
The Deed Restriction shall appear as the following:
This conveyance is made conditioned upon and subject to the following
restriction. The Grantee, heirs, successors and assigns, are restricted from
erecting any fence or other structure within the utility and drflinage easements
dedicated by plat over the above-described property, except with the prior
written consent of the City of Shako pee. This restriction shall run in favor of
and be enforceable by the City of Shako pee.
G. The following variations are granted from the zoning code provisions:
1. 15 foot structure separations are approved for all lots, with no side yard setback
being less than 5 feet.
2. 50 foot lot width minimum requirement for all lots.
H. The applicant shall implement the use of Best Management Practices for erosion control and
stormwater management during construction.
1. The applicant shall verify that all items set forth by Todd Hubmer ofWSB & Associates,
Inc. in his letter dated September 16,2004 (Exhibit 1) have been adequately addressed.
II. Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following conditions shall apply:
A. Outlot A shall be incorporated into the commercial development proposed east of Riverside
Fields 4th Addition, at the time that development occurs.
B. This development shall comply with City Code Section 10.60, concerning noise elimination
and noise prevention. Responsibility for other noise mitigation measures that may be
required in the future shall rest with the developer and/or its assigns.
C. Building construction, sewer, water service, fire protection and access will be reviewed for
code compliance at the time of building permit application(s).
D. The applicant shall design and provide an emergency fire apparatus access road (including
installation. maintenance and easement agreements) from the end of Fescue Circle through
Outlot A of Riverside Fields 4th Addition to a future drive in Outlot B of Riverside Fields 3rd
Addition.
E. Watermains to be installed in this development shall provide the necessary looping
connections, as required by Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
F. All existing easements are retained.
G. Final grading, utility connections and access to city streets will need approval by the
Engineering Department.
H. All outstanding fees will apply.
1. Temporary street signs are required prior to construction.
J. Provide a second remote access (including easements) in accordance with International Fire
Code Appendix D when the total count of lots accessing Crossings Boulevard west of
County Road 18 exceeds 100 units.
K. Landscaping shall be consistent with the submitted landscape plan, except that the applicant
shall modify the tree replacement plan for the Red Oak trees planned along Rye Court,
either by staggering the species along the cul-de-sac to avoid having adjacent Red Oaks or
by replacing the Red Oaks with another species such as Ironwood, Blue Beech, Black Ash,
Burr Oak or Swamp White Oak.
L. The applicant should transplant healthy young trees on site whenever possible.
M. The developer shall install rain sensors for the irrigation system, and that all sprinklers
owned and operated by the Homeowner's Association shall have rain sensors consistent
with State Law requirements.
N. The applicant shall construct houses using construction materials and methods for indoor
noise mitigation.
O. The applicant shall include 6 inches of topsoil, meeting MNDOT specifications, on the
entire site.
p, Property addresses will not be released until the approved final plat is recorded with Scott
County Land Records.
Q. Provide electronic AutoCAD files of the Final Plat to the Engineering Department.
R. Submit two (2) copies of the final plat (11" x 17"), and an electronic copy, to the
Community Development Department, as follows:
a. The final plat copies shall be labeled 'final' and include the Council hearing approval
date.
b. Submit paper copies to: Community Development Department, 129 Holmes Street
South,Shakopee,NUN 55379.
c. Send electronic copy (.dwg or .shp) to RecordedPlat@ci.shakopee.mn.us.
THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that approval of the Final Plat of RIVERSIDE
FIELDS FOURTH ADDITION does not constitute a representation or guarantee by the City of Shakopee as
to the amount, sufficiency or level of water service that will be available to lots within the plat as they are
developed.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
held the _ day of , 2005.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
E~\e::,n- ~ ;
-:-
9
AG ~ Subject Property
N · hakopee Boundal)'
.- . s
&{f.:r E - dary
b zoning 60un
~ W~sr D Parcel Boundal)'
.S
SHAK05INC~'.'7
- h
~-- "e!ds 4t
Final Plat Riverside Fu
Addition
02/08/2005 O~:~~ r^^ i:l::l'i:l';'OIO"" """'., I .., "_0".--
. E~-T-\ \~\\ ~
c:eNTEX HOMes
Minnesota Division
, ~70' Wlmc:wStet Orlva
Sull; $QO
Mlnnetonka. MN 55343
Phonc:9S2-936.7e~3
February 8, 2.005 Fa~: 952.936.r939
Mr. Mark Noble
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street South
Shal<opee, MN 55379
Re: Riverside Fields 4tll Addition
Dear Mr. Noble:
This letter is in response to our conversation February 7,2005 regarding a variance for the over length
cul-de-saC (Switchgrass Circle) for the above referenced project,
Centex Homes has revised the right of way at the North end of Switchgrass Circle in Riverside FIelds 4th
Addition. The continuous right of way will allow the city to access to the adjacent property in case of an
emergenCY. Centex Homes and Shakopee Crossings Commercial would prefer to construct the cul-de-sac
with the emergency connection be via a bituminouS path with knock down bollards to prevent the
commercial traffic from using Switchgrass Circle. By granting the rIght of way we would consider
Switchgrass Circle a tl1ru street and not a cuI-de sac.
Thank you for your attention to this matter, and if you have any questions, or require any additional
information, please call me at 952..912.5441.
Sincerely,
Ryan Lewis
--K
...-".-
I
~
Centex Homes
E.><t-+, b,r b
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Shakopee City Council
Shakopee Planning Commission
FROM: Tom Pitsch neider, Fire Inspector
SUBJECT: Riverside Fields 4th Addition - Over Length Cul-De-Sac and
Emergency Fire Apparatus Access Road
DATE: February 21,2005
INTRODUCTION:
Within the final plat for Riverside Fields 4th Addition there is a variance request
for an over length cul-de-sac. The requested variance is to allow a cul-de-sac
with a length exceeding the City of Shakopee standard of 750 feet. The variance
is for a cul-de-sac 850 feet in length. This plat also includes provisions for an
emergency fire apparatus access road to be constructed northward from the
requested over length cul-de-sac.
BACKGROUND:
A condition has been included in each of the past plat applications for
developments within the Riverside Fields area. The condition states that when
more than 100 units are constructed, a second access shall be provided for use
as an Emergency Fire Apparatus Access Road. Through discussions with
Shakopee Crossings Limited Partnership, Ryland Homes and Centex Homes, it
was determined that the best location for such an access road would be to utilize
the existing construction access road between South bridge Parkway and the
Riverside Fields development. The original preliminary plat submittal for
Riverside Fields 4th Addition indicated that a road would extend from the
commercial area to the residential area. During preliminary plat discussions it
was determined that the City and developer preferred a separate access point to
the commercial area and that there should not be public roadway access
between the commercial and residential section. Discussion then continued on
how best to provide for a second temporary access to the Riverside Fields
development. The best solution is to provide a paved trail/access between the
commercial and residential portions of the development. At this time there are no
plans to construct the commercial portion. This means that the temporary
access will need to be gained from another area. Utilizing the existing
construction access road as an emergency fire apparatus access road would be
the preferred choice.
The developer will be providing appropriate documents to provide for the needed
easements and maintenance agreements needed to create and maintain the
emergency fire apparatus access road. The emergency apparatus access shall
be permanently maintained if the variance for the over length cul-de-sac is
approved.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the variance for an over length cul..de-sac within the Riverside
Fields 4th Addition plat and include appropriate conditions for the
easement agreements and installation and maintenance of the emergency
fire apparatus access road.
2. Do not approve the variance for an over length cul-de-sac within Riverside
Fields 4th Addition plat, thereby requiring the cul-de-sac not to exceed 750
feet in length. This will create an emergency fire apparatus road over 100
feet in length. An access of this length will have additional design and
construction requirements. Appropriate conditions will need to be included
in the plat for the easement agreements, installation and maintenance of
the emergency fire apparatus access road.
ACTIONS REQUESTED:
Staff recommends alternative #1 allowing an over length cul-de-sac within
Riverside Fields 4th Addition and including appropriate conditions on the plat for
the easement agreements, installation and maintenance of the emergency fire
apparatus access road.
~\e,\\ F
City of Shakopee
Memorandum.
TO: Mark Noble, Planner I
FROM: Joe Swentek, Proj ect Engineer
SUBJECT: Final Plat - Riverside Fields 4th Addition
PID NO.: 27-366066-1
CASE NO.: 05022
DATE: February 9, 2005
The application indicates a Final Plat request for a single-f8.1nily residential development to be
located in Outlot C of the Riverside Fields 3rd Addition.
After reviewing the .above referenced application, we have the following comments for the
applicant and the planning department:
Gener~
1. Execution of a Developer's Agreement, which shall include provisions for security for
public improvements within the Final Plat and the engineering review fees.
2. Payment of Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges shall be made, as required by the most current
City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
3. Payment of Trunk Storm Water Charges and Trunk Stonn Water Storage and Treatment
Charges shall be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
4. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City Engineer and the Shakopee
Public Utility Commission (SPUC) approve the Final Constmction Plans and
Specifications.
5. Provide electronic (Auto CAD) files of the Final Plat to the engineering department.
Final Plat
1. Fescue Circle exceeds the maximum allowable length for a cul-de-sac as set forth by the
City of Shakopee's Design Criteria. The length shall be shortened so as to comply with
the requirements.
c D.:,um~l'lIi:z1ld S~1:1ns.s .\.!!\oc:: L\i':ll S:aiiogs T~m;:~r:.~" Z;l:::"i~:: .~i;::s.Oi..;.:g .F;r.:l!.f'l:n R:n:w Rl\':rIi~: Fi:ldJ.J::. i d.:, "
:r::st : iJr:
.
.
.
2. The applicant shall work with City staff to provide emergency access from the end of
Fescue Circle to Outlot B of Riverside Fields 3rd Addition.
3. The lots lines at the end of the Fescue Circle cul-de-sac shall be realigned so as to be
more radial with the right-of-way.
4. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They shall
include, but not be limited to, the following:
. Provide a total of seventeen (17) feet of drainage and utility easement in the rear of
Lots 1-3 of Block 1.
. Provide a total of seventeen (17) feet of drainage and utility easement in the rear of
Lot 4 of Block 1.
. Provide a total of seventeen (17) feet of drainage and utility easement in the rear of
Lot 6 of Block 1.
5. Simultaneous to the recording of the plat, a deed restriction shall be recorded on the
following lots:
. Block 1: Lots 1-4, 7-10, 12-18,23-30,33-43,48-57 & 62
. Block 2: Lots 1-14
The Deed Restriction shall appear as the following:
This conveyance is made conditioned upon and subject to the following restriction. The
Grantee, heirs, successors and assigns, are restricted from erecting any fence or other
structure within the utility and drainage easements dedicated by plat over the above-
described property, except with the prior written consent of the City bf Shakopee. This
restriction shall run in favor of and be enforceable by the City of Shakopee.
Storm Water Management Plan
The applicant shall verify all items set forth by Todd Hubmer (WSB & Associates, Inc.) in his
letter dated September 16, 2004 have been adequately addressed.
Recommendation
Engineering staff recommends approval subject to the comments listed above being addressed by
the applicant prior to recording of the Final Plat.
e. D.,.:'Jri".-:nii :IV; So:u:ni-i .~.1~ook'.~:ie:' 3et:!:"ig5.Tt'i.".~,r:!';-I~ler:'<:1 FiJ:l o Ll(-;' rjn~l P:~! ?:",'::w P.i-.;,:,!;,: F:rJds.':l!1 ].d-:':
:';.:,:: ~i":
A -e,c ~ \ f!:>> \ T 1
WSB
&: A.ssociates. Inc. September 16, 2004
Mr. Joe Swentek
City of Shako pee
129 Holmes Street S.
Shakopee,~ 55379
Re: Riverside Fields 3rd Addition
Review of Grading Plan and Storm Sewer System
WSB Project No. 1281-76
Dear Mr. Swentek:
We have reviewed the construction drawings and grading plan for the above-referenced project.
Inparticular, we have reviewed the following plans related to this particular request:
. Grading Construction Plans for Riverside Fields 3rd Addition development - dated
08/20/04, received 08/24/04.
. Stonnwater Management Plan, Riverside 'Fields 3rd Addition - dated 08/20/04, received
08/24/04.
Based on our review of the final plans and calculations, we offer the following detailed
comments related to this application:
1. Extend catch basin south 011 Rye Court to Station 3+50 to capture additional drainage
discharging from the south.
2. The site appears to discharge into a flood prone area as identified in the City stonnwater
management plan. Please reduce discharge from site to 0.1 cfs per acre for the 100-year
24-hour event. The hydrologic modeling information for the project indicates that
under proposed conditions, 24 acres will discharge into proposed north pond and off site
to the northeast.
3. It is not clear from the infonnation provided if wetlands are located on site. Please
identify any delineated wetlands on gTading plan.
4. Confinn invert elevation of 24-inch Rep located in northwest portion of site. Previous
development plans in the vicinity identify invert elevation at 748.69. Please also
confirm that the ultimate outlet for this development will be incorporated into the Blue
Lake watershed storm sewer tnmk system discharging to the west.
4150 Olson
t./;emor;al Hji~WEY 5. Verify exfiltration rate used in hydrologic calculations for north pond.
;;,;i:: ;oc
j'l\iilrl~;:';;IjUs 6. Idel1tifv conveyancewav direction. capacity and pondin~ location for areas drainin~ to
. .I .I,... '-' .-
the south in the southeast comer of the proposed development.
f\I.:j;:I~~=~a.
=;~22
...
i~3.3~'; ;~aCfJ
-..~ ;:,'.' ",-;.-.~: ::.." i'l.:-:;.~:.~=:;~ :'\. c;.~~~. :=:.~!: O?:''':~:'J:-,;:Y :..7:;'~:j€:~ F':;~'~~J'V!:'./.j ].~ j.i6:.?'ji }(j':;-IJ!.d~.~
/ E)(~\!)\T "
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mark Noble, Planner I
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Approval of Riverside Fields 4th Addition Final Plat
DATE: March 11, 2005
This memorandum is in regards to the extension of temporary sanitary sewer from
Riverside Fields 4th Addition to the proposed Riverside Bluffs plat. A request has been
made by Ryland Homes to extend sanitary sewer to Riverside Bluff proposed plat to
serve this site until the permanent sewer from the west can be installed. Attached is a
map showing the sanitary sewer service districts in this area.
Engineering staff has recommended that the extension of temporary sewer be denied
since the permanent sewer may be available in a year or two. A temporary sewer
extension can be provided with several conditions as follows:
. Developer of Riverside Bluffs pays for the sewer extension and escrows funds for
the future abandonment ofthe temporary sewer line.
. Developer acknowledges that the extension of sewer from Riverside Fields 4th
Addition does not constitute any approval of any kind to Riverside Bluffs.
. Developer enters into an agreement with the city for the additional operation and
maintenance costs associated with the diversion of sewage to the Southbridge lift
station with the developers agreement of Riverside Bluff.
. Developer agrees that a connection to the temporary sewer line cannot be done
until the spring of 2006 assuming a preliminary plat approval of Riverside Bluffs.
In my view, the proposed plat of Riverside Bluffs has several issues that need to be
resolved before approval. These issues include the following:
. CSAH 21 EIS
. Relocation and design of Prior Lake outlet channel
. Revised JP A between the City of Shakopee and Prior Lake-Spring Lake
Watershed District for cost sharing of improved channel
. Greenway corridor design in this area
. CSAH 16 roadway improvements for access to plat
. Revised wetland delineation in the spring of 2005
. Relocation of park from Riverside Fields
With the number of issues associated with this plat and others nearby sites, in my
opinion, this plat should not be approved until 2006 construction season. Also with the
amount of work in progress such as Countryside development and the new Public Works
building project and lots in inventory already, it would be difficult for staff to properly
review and inspect this development in 2005.
In summary, staff did not recommend the temporary sanitary sewer line to Riverside
Bluffs proposed plat for orderly extension of utilities and for. growth management. If
council wants to approve the temporary sanitary sewer line connection, it should be done
with conditions outlined in this memo.
/b;n?ftl
Public Works Drrector
BL/pmp
Riverside 4th addition
Ek4-he:.rr \\
RYLAND
The Rylal1ld Group, Inc.
March 1,2005 7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Contractor's Lic # 20035443
www.ryland,com
Mayor and City Council
Shakopee City Hall
129 South Hohnes Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
Re: Riverside Fields 4th Addition, conditions of Final Plat
Honorable Mayor and City Council members:
Riverside Fields 4th Addition Final Plat approval is before you this evening for your
approval. As part of the City Engineering staff comments on the plan, they have asked
that the sewer connection from this property, in Crossings Blvd. to property further west
be eliminated. We respectfully request that the sewer connection be left in the approved
plans for Riverside 4th Addition for the following reasons:
1) The original City Resolution for Riverside Fields and the current Resolution
approving Riverside Fields 3 rd Addition, require the connection. /
2) Ryland Homes has an agreement with Mark Liesner, the property owner of the 46
acres west and adjacent to Riverside Fields, to develop the property as single
family.
a. Together with the property owner, we have been working with the City
staff since last September in preparation of plans for a single-family
neighborhood, in reliance upon this connection.
b. Prior to the first of the year the City Engineering staff indicated that if
there was' sewer capacity for the Liesner property to be served temporarily
to the east, it could be done. However, more recently, City staff has
indicated the City Council would make the determination whether the
Liesner property could be served temporarily through Riverside Fields.
3) We have met with Centex Homes, and they have no objection to leaving the
connection in their plans.
4) The temporary connection supports the orderly and sequential single;.family
development of this area of the City, also supported by the logical extension of:
Crossings Blvd.; water mains; storm-water systems; park, trail, and open-space.
5) The Liesner property is in an area of the City identified by the City Council as
appropriate for current development.
6) The Liesners and Ryland Homes has been working with the PRAC and the EAC
and designed a preliminary plat that:
a. Conforms to all City Ordinances.
b. Proposes a single-family neighborhood of high-value homes consistent
with City land-use wishes.
c. Provides park and trail systems consistent with City standards.
i. Ryland will dedicate additional developable easement area usable
for parks and trails as a part of the approved plat.
d. Completes a connection from existing Crossings Blvd. to County Road 16.
Ryland Homes has appeared before the EAC twice and the PRABand will be at the
March 3 Planning Commission. We believe we have resolved all questions from the
EAC and the PRAB and we hope to be to the City Council in March or early April.
We ask that you leave the sewer connection in the Riverside Fields 4th Addition Final Plat
approval and allow the temporary service of the Liesner property through Riverside 4th
Addition.
1S Enger Mark Liesner
Land Resources Manager Joel Liesner
Ryland Homes Twin Cities Division Eagle Creek Blvd.
Shakopee.N1N
E',(\-\\1:!>t, .I-
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
MEMORANDUM
To: Mark Noble, Planning
From: Mark Themig, Parks, Recreation, and Facilities Director
Date: March 7, 2005
Subject: Clarification on Letter from Chris Enger, Ryland Homes on Riverside
Fields 4th Addition
I wanted to comment on the letter that Chris Enger from Ryland Homes distributed at the
March 1 City Council meeting, and correct one of his statements.
In the second to last paragraph, Mr. Enger references the proposed Riverside Bluff
development and states that:
"Ryland Homes has appeared before the EAC and PRAB and will be at
the March 3 Planning Commission meeting. We believe we have resolved
all questions from the EAC and the PRAB and we hope to be to the City
Council in March or early April."
Ryland Homes presented their preliminary plat for Riverside Bluffs to the Environmental
Advisory Committee on February 9. The EAC tabled action due to unresolved questions
regarding the location of proposed greenway corridor. The EAC set a special workshop
to discuss greenway corridor criteria for March 2, at which time they developed various
considerations in identifying greenway corridors.
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board reviewed the Riverside Bluffs preliminary plat
at their February 28 meeting and also tabled action on the plat, pending additional input
from the EAC on potential greenway corridors, and how those corridors relate to park
needs.
Mr. Enger's statement that all questions have been resolved is not true. The EAC is
scheduled to continue the discussion on March 9, and the PRAB will continue discussion
on March 28. Depending on the outcome of these meetings, there may be a
recommendation for the Planning Commission in time for their April 7 meeting.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
--...... .. . ..... .-.... ----. -.--- -- -'--.---
e e RI V.ERSI D'E.. FlEL.D.S ;4TH ADD.IQN . E ~+-l\~ \\"'". 'c...
-
AREA SKETCH
AREA SUMMARY
TOTAL LOT A"RE:A ,,' 12.2588 'Jeres
Ou . TOTAL OUTLOT ~.REA, = 0.0365' acres
TOTAL RIGHT-OF..,.WAY ARE.1i = 2.8719 acres
/; TOTAL AREA = 15.1672 acres
~.z,,-~O l'
~9.-:: -<J
1
I
I
t
,
,
'" 1 O. .
.~m.,. 36
7.5'8 s~.~l.
..
9 '
8.647 sq.ll. "'-
"
13
10.009 sq.fl.
\ f-
g
0
14 ()
7 g.1t2 sq.'!' f:f
6.24.1 sq.ft.
~
6 ff
6.059 sq.'l. 15 is
7.66B sq.!!. ~
~
CI)
5 16
&./),15 sq.fl.
7,192 sq.n. I
4 I- 17 i.
e.Q4~ sq.lt. a::: 5.99:' :iq.lt.
::J 6.&e; ''=l.fl. fI
0 ~;
()
3 w 18 12
>- ,.
1~.OI'I~ ::itl..H. G.03F.i sq. H. w
a::: G.17~ :;q ft. I
2 19 22 44 ~ 13
;,.v';!i ::o.fl I 47 &.,JG6 :.c.fL
~.;~1 :!';\ fl. ,~.....e!- :oq H. ':'.:'::'2 :;0:::.11. 1
I '.7i7 !;Q H. f
! ! ,
I I ~,
1 46 14 t'
20 45 I f:
;.E.5~ !lO: H. I 21 i.eB;, sq.H. L
I 1.22: :;~ IL
i'':.~:' ~.:,.{! i '7..:~.: :;~ f:. ~.r.:;;;' :;r;l!~ ~
I
: :
l
l:~
,
F
t
r
j.
r~,~ NgE.R.engineering ~;
,
i
(.:1. .l.t....1 ..;,.~ .......n.l.... :,,1,. I.. rll'U-,.~ .1, 0:;:: :....:j~:"~r;....t.:,H..1:-
_._' . :."1:
R I VE R S I D E F I E. L D S : 4 TH . ADD I TI 0 N KN'" ; 0 n '. ,m... .vo 0 gonero par.ne"mp,
:S~~!Ti"RD--T-----: . H........ '.... '. ~~n:;~i~.Ol~.~~fl:'DIIOWin9cSescribedprOP'rt)'Situatedinthecounl}'orScot\.Slalo!'"
, (/, , -- 'e . e
~.A~/ I I . . . '~II?1 C, RIvt;RSlOt ~ltLDS . 17101"., a~cording 19 the-. recCl~ded plol there-of. Scot. 1. COUI"II)'"
...srte....... '"" 1\.:~ '1 .. .. . Minnesota. .) . . .
. ,,'.... I I' Has cau2eo th.a $om~ to bt' :.re.)'1ld D"d plaUe-'=' as R1YERSlDE flELOS 4tH AODITJOtl and does
~t 01;\" I I I hereb\' dl!dilcot~ 10 the public for publit USll: forever 11'1: CourtE Dnd CirC1t. and olse. dedic;ol!!s the
~~S~~fio""'" I~n I ,"r + -ill eosementl os ShQ~n'on'lhi& plat for.dralnQ~u~ and u\imY-'~urpCl5es ani)'"
VO:JlE -r:----- ----- ,
1 I. I I" wilness whereof said Cente): Homes. a Hcvado 9aner'ol ~artnership, he. f:(Jus~d these pre5~nts
I -Ul..'.1 " ~,... "',.. J to be sign.rd by Ceont..;.: ReoJ E.state Corporation, a foJevada corporation. its monogir\lJ general
I :;,. t ,"r ..:17. I ,-r 1 poMner thiS _ day of' 20 _ , ,
I I I S1': Cente7 .R~gJ Estate Corporo'joll
I I I Its:' MOr'loqing General Parlnp.t
Lu.___-L_____..J Cl J B....' .
I \ I.
. SECTION 13. TVIP, 115. RGEo 22 \ I ~ I r, Scott J. Ri,=htrr, Division "'r~5jdent
~~~ - I U
J~~ ~ S~~ ..
..; COUNTY OF
1h~ forcgCling instf\lmenl was a~".nowledgeQ before me this _ dei' C,r
20~ b}. Scott J. Rithhr, Division Prfsidenl, on bl!hotf of Cenle:c Real utate
Corporation. Q Ne'lodo c:orporalic,", its managing general portner of Centoex Homes, ~ foJ.,vQdQ
9~nerQI pattnel"5hip. '
Notory PubliC; Count)',
M). C~mmi5$ion E:f~ires
. I hereby certify thot I hl)ye sur\leyed and ploUed the prOP,rl1 'dftseribed ora thin pial a~
RIVERSIDE FIELDS 4lH ADOlnON. thai this pial is a cerrect representt.llion or the surve),: that
all djstcnces ore ~o"er;ll)' shown on lhe glat in tee-\. ond hundredths of 0 root.: that 011
monuments hove ~een correcU;I placed j~ the ground 1?'s. shown, or will be cornettY.I=.locedin
the ground as destgnated; that lh~ outSide boundary lines ore corrc!;Uy designaled on lhe
pial; end thal there ore no wetlQnds as di!fin~d in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.02. SUbd.
i, or pubris: highwoys to be: designu.l~d other than ,QS s~own: .
. John C. l.orson, Professionof L.and Surveyor
MinnC!S~1aLicense 1'10. 19628 . .
STATE OF MINIiESOTA
COUNTY OF
The 10r:090;n9 Surveyor'$" CerUfic.C1l~ wos ?d:nowledged "efor~ me lhi:i _ doy 'of.
20,~ by John C: Lorson. Profeuiond Land Surveyor, Mlnn~sClto Ueenslt tlo.19S28
Hal or)' Public County. Minntliolo
. Uy Commiuion .El(~irtl
o
~ CITY ATTORNEY" crN OF SHAKOPEE. l.tlllNESOTA
f hereby certify lhol'l hove e~omiMd 'nil plot of RIVERSIOe: FIELDS 4TH AD01T101'J and do'
hereby recomm~md this pial for opprovol os to tor"; this _ day of
20~ .
Cit.' Attorney, Sho~.opee, Wnnl!sota
;::: CITY COUI'Cll., CITY OF SHA1<OPtE. MlfolNtSOTA
~ This plot of RtVERSIDE flElDS4nf ADOITIOl4 YlOS approved and accepted by the! City Council
.q- of the City of Shi::lkopef. fAirif1esoto. at a regular meelin9 thereof hald this
day of 20--, and pursucnl to M.S.A.'S05.03,' -
sub. 2. we ore in conformanc:e, .
r ""1 Moyor CI.~;,
~ 81 5 18 . ~~
tJ lill llil SCOTT COutm SURVE'IOP. )
lX L.!:I89'SO' 37't 120. SQ.J . :;
Lo. - - - - - - - Pursuant to Uinnuoto Stolute::. Chopll:t 3B9.09. Subd, 1. Of. amended, lhl!i 'plol he: been '
<> r - -, r reviewed ond apJ:lroved thi:. doy of . 20 I.'.
.. S6S'50'J7'W . -,
" ~I 4 I~ 81;:1 . By I"
:- I. I S;;f Jan Scoll CtlUf\ly Survejlor
% ~ L!:1~'~=2:'~ _ ~O.2iU .'
iE ~ '~ SCOTT COUI'JTI AUOnOp./TREASIJRER
~ en 66 r jo 0 r 569'50'31"W t I her'1by cl:difj' that lht' o:urrenl ond d~linquenl tOf.es r;.n th~lond<; d'!:''Sc:ribed wilhin ore paid ~nt!
w p ~ 1 3 I~ C!l 18 12 r.-- thQ trcnsr~r i~ entered this _ de;.' of _~ ~O_'
z 0 on lon' iill .
~ v:: l!:!1!!5.2:~L _~OJ.O.J - 60 '0 0 60 ,i9nod "l C..ouly
~ r ., rs89'SO' :;7"Y: - Iii: 7! ., '~q m ' J 1 ., 1 I
\. ~ I 2 I~ 81 22 I I 47 ~ I . F t SCOTT CO'J/oITi RECOROE?
- 0 I IJi ' .- ;lce e In ee
1/'1 l.!:!eg'SJ/:;7"r 120.90-1 I I her~t:.l t,:rlifj' that lh~: &1101 wo:: fil~d in tn;~ ofliCf' lhi:; ~ .JQ:f t.r
------- I J.U 20 -" at _ ot;l(lc;, _1.1. os uo,;urttcnl Hei.
r ., r.;....C.J7.". 11" '" ",r <c..So.37..../ 119,7<" I ' . r N69'50"7"'< 100 19 ., ~
I 1 I 30 I .-. J .. C,J_ I :~I _.c -. I:;' I ~I ,- -., I :'
o r', '=' 0 0 .~l . ~ to "t _;., C'lI - r--. $:ot: (;:IUn\y Recorda:-
<< I ) J<< '!J 20 j'" .,1 21 ~IN '0 , ... 45 46 JO ~O .,/"! 14 I~-
tr. .... ", tl r. 0 ToJ;"'" ...~ . Jr"'1 rl .
.. I I'. '''1 I'" 81 ,'''111 I 1 l;1'" I'" 0
15L_______~ L_______~ %L_______~~ ~L________~ ~
:~r;_90 liS.~~ I. iI7.':;": ZO_OO 30.011 030.01).1 3000 ~2.z.19 _ _ eEARllJc,~ loRE' 2J..SEG 011 WES7LUlE lJi '''':. '-/QP1IiWCST
N89'-O'37"E g' 5 26 I)'J."'E? (\" SEe 1:;. 1\'IP. II:; p.ce 2: \'I';IC", '; :,SSIJIIEu
I :) I . j() HJ..I/! ./. EE/.FW.IG Oi SO{j'O~'2~ "j!
: '" r, ;:, r.:- ",' r'. :- _ .-\ ., 1 "" ;' _I ..... '" DRAIN,tI.GE AND UTILITY
"' , '" - ". " - ..:; I I', ., - 1, ....1 '.' L . 'I ,.... ;-" i..J .~ EAS-MENTS AR'" SHOWN THU~'
;::~. j - --. - . . t. ,I:. .,J. 0 C'~r-IOl::S 1/:: 1:'ICH S',' j..; IUr::H IPQ!1 1.ICl.:t;!.{::"Ul
~j~r~ ~Oc ~:, - - -- --- -1 a'. r- - - ~ ,0 _ _ _ _ ;-: ~ ,_ . . S~.~.~l:,I'~AF:l'":~~:..,~I~.~JSE..'l~':~:~ :"o"i
..../.., .c~ .,. , . ! I -;! '-c I,'J I..O,IU..,t.I, JII..8C!. ,..."". "' ~l'" """JT~
,~,._.,._.:i;;~zc~'~'cvT",!; ...__ .. i ~;~<. 1 .,,~ "'_ : ~:L. : _____L____:I~~____l___ ~~f~~~~~~~~;J~~~~~~~~tJ~~~~'h;~~"
I ." .. ., 11-." '--1.- ... I . ...... ,,-. J-:_ to- I """'r--\'-.r, I I J I"~-! ~~.lr'I.~rll.,IJI/."-lj -~I.~ ... i/ IlJI"',-: .
~~;_~. I.' 'i u.~,~c. '?:~ : ,c..,~:; ~: ';1..1 'J? ~~ ,~,~~: ; ..j", ~~~:~~!Ef:3i~J~~~~'~?',JFEi~i~~:.:~;~~i?~:';'I~~ ,"~!.~~~~ IF;~~;'\U;;ul.;~m$ """Rif:. e;: L':~;'~'
":2 ' ,. I" ..:". ..-' _.::. . ~'- ,..,;. . 1"1 :.:: .::~..-. .'-- PI -NE"""'D
10-:'. ~;- _...j-;' ;.,'1";..' ~:....-~ ~1"Ii L.'.,!.;.~ :,):_:..:.;;: ..)l..:,:",::,'.:.:!.;. ~.L-J
;"" '.";' :~t " ~:~ 1);:;:':",,;::1:; O!: ;,.,~ ;'LJ., . L1 \.en.oineerinO'
e--:-..--- :;'~~~. ::':~. P.t;~ 1: .~ I rl~'I~r.'''~I'.'Tf;'~ 1."':;l~Jo':..11'o' 1";'::I:;'I<:...;,;:~.P~..,.:.:'C.M; '.';':'I'";"1'g
. /' ..llVEf&. ,. toe. .t=i\ Cl..01a - P~I M UJ~IL" f'~"'"
, /' ^ \ TOTM. MEA 79.8209 ACRES
("'....
, 0< \ J' /' / \ TOTAL R.O.W. AREA _ _ _'4.3415 ACRES
\' / ~ 1M .
. rp /'. ~ TOTAl. LOT AREA 57.2062 ACIlES
(' /' n '
,.0< /' " \ TOTM. CU1l.OT AREA 6.2572 ACRES
....,.~\ /' ...'"
,: .. ,\,-' r: '\' TOTM. CU'll.O'lS --2
,/, ""
./ 'C.. NU~BER OF LOTS _ ?11
,I' _ " \
,. c:. .. 'i 4"" ...... . ~ ,.' WCEST LOT (RESIDENilAl.) 49.497 SQ. FT.
~,...-.;,....,.- ,.."
'.:,'i''-J........... ,4 S~AU.EST LOT (RtSlDENiI"L) ~.54Q SO. F'T.
.. .......- . ':J \ "valAGE LOT (RESlDEHilAL) _11,810 So. FT.
.... \ I""'{.;\::. (" r'"
....' .?rt \ ."J -- 'f~ '-J '\ 0 '0 \Oll zoo GROSS DENSITY (ExCl.UDES OU1LO'lS. LOT 3~. BU(. 2 '" LOT 65. BLK. I) _3.4 RESIDEl/i1"L LOTS/AC.
~,..' . \ r''''' -- ~ I I I I
::;v'-' __ .... ': 65 .:.~-!, NET DEl/SlTY (EXCLUDES OU1LOTS, R/W, LOT 34. BU<. 2 5: LOT 65. eLK. I) _4.4 RESIDEl/i1"L LOTS/"C.
___ ....\ \ .JIU91' '" ~_/ I'
,.. ...) ,~ ~~,(\ "'./;' ~ ., CRAPHlC SCALE IN FEET ZONING PRO
Co '-J <1J...,p "~~,, 'I'"
,~~ J..../" 'I- .~. UilUnES AV"'I.A!lLE
'\ '/" (' ,
l~~" 4 ~0
'& ''''':r-..,'' "',_1 '- I~~.f.
o ,.~ _ " '<1('" u:e., N'lI:;r.RIP'TIr.lN FM PRnJU1NAR'f PI iT Pl.JRPn1;F~ OJ./l Y
" .. \ -J. '" .. All lha\ part ar tht Nortnwett Ouorlcr 01 Section l~ township 115. Rang!! 1.0, Scott CClUfrty
1':(/ , Ylnn.,olo l)1n9 IOlollh-..t.tI)' IIr \he .lDuthw.st ''9hl 0' WIly I..., 01 tDloInt)' StoLl .Id. Hignwo)' No.
... :i'" ~~ 18 ancI laulhclISlcrly 0' thl sDUtheo.! 'Ight Df "01 line or Collnty Rood No. 21,
--- -, "'~~) -
LQ. "10, ..~.,:l "';
(,,~ "..-^ / r:,' <--
'~~", ,,<," /_C;,,) " "(" PREPARED BY PIONEER ENGINEERING, PA.
,-. ,.,0 <'~""~
V C)' ':;...../ JOHN C. LARSON
~;-), rP REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
, ...'
......... ''1> (' ~
~" REG. NO.
I~\,,~
")~'') ,
~~. ,,~~
, ",()
0,
, '\. ,},
,. "" , ,
;"'-,. '0
.>,. ~ ,~ ~
~ sm','"'' 11:_ ,,~ DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
8 12' ~'..'- '\. EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS:
:illS...." " II
~ '2' < ...., $-1
0:: .,''') , II
~1g~1l1~ v ~ ~ "001 #24~ :n.4S'.!l11 sr L 0 H 0
". II. 12. '" _ II _
:il20,,Illur S{ s.nu'2Jfq .--..'~. ~46f.2flJ. 0;1 ~Dsr ~ :;? S.UD.:;J "'", \16 "."-? _____J____J l____l_____
\ II. 118 g ~ 126 " '26 49 13 213 ~ . \.
= .. co 0 '" 7.1:IS1" ." beng 5 feet in width. and adjoining 101
2 UJ21'.>>1 rr : 7,b,CO Sf ~ L* Sf :;.... Ln' sr ~ ~ ',lI;n v ::: 7.168 SF;: ,.. J , Jines untess otherwise lndicoted. and
,,60 ". 21822 60 47'26 12' 46 60 14115 112 15, 60 :3'17 " ID teet In wldlh and adjoinIng st,.et
"" " lines and fear lot lines unless otherwise
:g ~i5 C~OSSlNG (, BOULEVARD '\., ind;ooled 011 \10. pial.
Ul ~il 0' '.
r-. I") 153 I\S I1S 125 lZS no 106 I 12&
fI) . 8063 82.0 80 GO ,
- :a 1un., n. ~ ;: lo.o7V... ~ : lo.OU.~ II. gJ i ur.s "'" It. i If.OtJ.e. n. is ~ ''-Iln flI. R. ... IDAn -.11. a ;- 1I.fOl "".'1. : ".
1 10' 6:> co 64 46 ...
8 \:!S ~ 118 116 W 124 12' W 1l~ 118 125 Iol ....
,.. < ,... ~ 9 2 ~ W \D t.'" SF' 46 ~ '....
" ,"'.. lG !l:w '" ",... on l.41:SI" V1.. W :I eml!7:a G,lusr:g W II'l 1,11111" '1.1>>". lit d Il'i e.1UV In 156 .... .
IQ' . <.:> .,,' '0" > > 10 63 '" a: ID 49 Ul '.
2 ~:r:d 84 121 118 81 0( '2' U< 0( 66'20 II. 0 1:~.. ill .....,
~l:i 0: 8 ::5 0::: 62 (t P. tUlot v45 "'" ~.IIIO ,. ~ '.~D' v- ........
~ 0 .,lOW Il"I "12!r' In ~ :a '~~':F ~ Llt1sr ~ W In 1.aQlSsr It'I 7,11111' .., 1.!J '" IoIUV 163 D .. .....
en WI... IG' Ul 0 ~ ~ lit 10;::"'50 12
.. 85 '" "e 80.... ,.. '2< ~ 67'20 '18 0 \2$ 13 '.
- \Z: 7 4 z. 6' ~ '0 17 .s "',
'" ,"" ~r ctl ::) In.. I.O~I V g A "714 V ~ :::> II) '....., on '''''':1 rn 8 '" "1O(:!r ""
liD . .. III V1 .,. C/) lD UI 0 'Cl 51 ~ '.
liB 79 12: 127 58 1'21 '11 \<17 41 "
'.
N t;8:!1 :; 6 5 ~ Of uu S, \1'1 60 \1'1 r - -
a"",,, Ir.'~.::r 0 1Z,1CilS., .- ., .. 01 69 '0 un sr \CI .
"" - -113 111
6! .' ., 59'" rh-:;::.--T-.-----,
t 7.'''5' 'eI,CJ' f I J
\ .~ ~~O. ( ;-.:<' ,I
~ "..' ~~. '/''{2-.,- I ,--...:" t
I~ I' \ ':'\~', \' I
$7 .,~ {.' "'/~\O, . :.C' I !
. /" // /" ,~ I
~ ~R~! I
'// // /.' ,/! . tl
I '-------llf1
Iii i J J J
r"I I _ ~.. i .... I
I '" _, ~_,
........\ 2-..msI It> I.,': t'.' I
" · .,. I ('.... . r.... I
- - '" .~ 1''/
""....." /.":? "....,- ".'''~ L_._..~..___-..i
';~ "1:i'7 c:- SECTIOI'} !:;. TWP. f 1;-. ?G::. 2~
~teC 1~~ !'; 2t" ..~.. LOCA TJONMAP
~ .. ~~
I "
I :::'~S~r1:":c:'3 ~:~8:-;-;8;'.: "'7":' ~~! ".l,.r':z:':." 1 I
...* *. :.../ -' I;-d ~ ._/, :...~ I
,. .,
"*' PIONEER 'i R[WS!O I'tClt' c:- W....fS I, \.t>~ LU.cO
of< -.rtln_lng.. ,............- I ...."J., 0" , '-"
:if- - ... _ _.... _ 1 ;;;.;-:,.':.;':'t,=~ I "f1'~~! ~CI"I,'! 11l~~ ~,".s, ::ll':.... w:: ~'t''''C'~C:f l"I"C :~ lI"'_~' ...'{ e,.t~\ l;t:"I'~ " D"'c e"'"Cr' _.0: '-. ....- 5H::t1 111:..r _ OWii~;: ?PC,l...i!~'
*.0:>1-1< ..._..;......_,~."'.""'~,..... 'u..,..."'."<"."'.m"u"_"'"~'''''''''''''''"'~'''u''''' ' . - ;0<""''' C;lR-! j'MINARV pi AT RY' AND H!"IM=-S R'V"'R'"'IDi:" i:"1~' r"'"' 7 .......
1mn-~:::,....!1J,o...-J \"~:O..3oll"'tr.to:l':~IJJ....I'Ingl~ ;'(1'jJic_DQI. r..=..,' l-t- 1:- \ L. I '",,1 ~ , .c. .:::>':.- I r..Li...I~ ':'"....1..
/ '&\-\ ~ E..
/
~ I t~~O% I
'" I "- 6" CLS AGGREG~ TE
"-
'" ACCESS ROAD
"'" (TYPICAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE)
"'"
~ ROW CO, RO. 18 .
~
24'
EDGE OF BIT TO EDGE OF BIT
6' 6' 6' 6'
r;BEVEL TO AT 30.
ALL FOUR SIDE
'( SAW CUT 2/3 DIA.
OF POST AND SEAL
SAW CUT WITH SlUCON
AT GROUr LEVEL
~
:;.-:; /.I".i'~
'XS"XS" PENTA
mEA TED WOODEN
BREAKAWAY POST
24' EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS
~
-:;?
~~.:+i~:\~D:
............... -z:
'!11iiii!i?:0, ~ T
~ GRAPHIC SCALE Dl FEE'l'
PI8NEERengineering
Clylt.'~"<GL'IEEIl5 UI'oOI'lA.~"'W L.\.'\1DSlJKVE'fOlU t..\."iO,SCANAllOIlltCJS 1tl320S-'\CCESSROADEXHIBIT
14:t! Enlttprise Dri\'C . 'JOI8SdlA\1~nueNW ~~e~b~CcrtifY~lthisP1M~~by Nll1lIC RC'\'binns Ollie 3.I.os
;'_~H""""IN"'2U Mendola HeIghts Office C"",..,i",.'L"S-<" "".~,,~~,:~:.~:;.::;.~J 0<';'00' DAS ACCESS ROAD EXHIBIT CENTEX HOMES RIVERSIDE FIELDS 4TH ADDITION I OF 1
(6.H)6IU-1914 h'c:6S1-94Jll1 (763) 7R3.IMHO Fax:7111-IRR3 umkttlu: bW$ orthc: SUlcofMiMCSUCI Rej!. No. ~ D:.IC~ Dr:lWh PC SHAKOPEE. MINNESOTA
--
!
, !
II I
~I
II
I It
~" L ,
I II I
I
- I
, I
I. j
~
JJ -.
)~ ~ 1
- ~
!
"
.... ~ , -
.- - ~ 011 -
?h,. Q -F!' - 1= ~~ L \ :If
..:)... J" ... I 1 ~ r1~ I'
I t" ~:j: "'''. :-. I
10" lIS" v~ <J. 1-
,,~ I' '-'1
~ ~ " /I
. J SEI-F /
I ~
1::- ,.. ,
"" . ~ '- I ~
. - 1
~ ~ . - 1 1
oc J-
/ r J ~ ~
SE.,.. L. ~ :,,\. I f ~_ -J.
. =""-...... ..
....-.d l"""l ~ J I I I I -II' I I ~
...6~~ II 1/11 /1, --
! " I. JI
I 1 II
I I' ,
I I I [- I \. ~ '" ')1~
LEGEND If st\-G II /
/ /
I >' Y /
Service Area PLI ~":,.-.( / / '(."' /
Service Area Southbridge Trunk 1/ 1'1' 'yu'
~ ... I /' ...,
...- - / ~ J
Proposed Trunk Sewers ::-. \. /:.'
\.
Existing Sanitary Sewer 'C... S~ .-\ 'T' '..(. 1-,.
/./ lr~ >,
Prior Lake Interceptor - "ry " I / 'X.
'/ ''" "< ~ \- I T1 1
Lift Station . I ~_ I' .
,/ 'r'l .
b ~ ~ ~.1 ,(' /' ~'< d: ~
!'/ -< /
/ fT.,_.._.,../ "
SEWER SERVICE AREAS
(SOUTHEAST SHAKOPEE DISTRICT)
---.--....--