The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About14.B. Retail Center PUD and Preliminary and Final Plat of Dean Lakes 3rd Addition-Res. No. 6213-Res. No. 6214 CITY OF SHAKOPEE J4f. f># Memorandum CASE LOG NO.: 05-029 TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Julie Klima, Planner II SUBJECT: Retail Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Preliminary and Final Plat of Dean Lakes Third Addition MEETING DATE: March 15,2005 REVIEW PERIOD: January 20 - May 20, 2005 Site Information Applicant: Ryan Companies Property Owner: Ryan Companies Location: South ofHwy 169, East/West ofCSAH 83 and North ofCSAH 16 Current Zoning: Highway Business(B 1)/ PUD Overlay #24 Adjacent Zoning: North: Highway Business (B 1 )/Retail Center PUD #25 South: Planned Residential District (PRD) East: Business Park (BP)/Medium Density Residential (R2) West: CSAH 83 MUSA: The site is within the MUSA boundary. CONSIDERATIONS Ryan Companies has made application for retail center PUD, preliminary plat and final plat approval of Dean Lakes Third Addition. The proposed development is located south ofHwy. 169, east and west ofCSAH 83 and north ofCSAH 16. The subject site is a portion of the overall Dean Lakes PUD. The retail center PUD request is only for that property currently described as Outlots N, 0, and Q, Dean Lakes First Addition. As a part ofthe retail center, the applicant is also requesting the approval of 5 conditional use permits (CUP's). Please reference the attached March 3 Planning Commission report for additional information regarding the PUD and plat applications. The Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat and retail center PUD at its March 3 meeting. A copy of the March 3 Planning Commission memo has been attached for the Council's reference. 1 At the March 3 Planning Commission meeting, the following items were discussed: 1. The recommended conditions of approval for the preliminary plat, include a condition requiring the removal of Outlot A from Dean Lakes Third Addition. Ryan Companies has agreed to remove this outlot from the proposed plat. 2. Removal of Outlot A would bring the total impervious surface area for Dean Lakes Third Addition to approximately 82% (where 75% is the maximum allowed by City Code). In response to this situation, Ryan Companies is proposing that impervious surface percentages be calculated over all the Highway Business (B 1) zoned property within the. Dean Lakes development rather than independently on the Second and Third Additions. While this approach is justifiable from a zoning perspective, it would require that the stormwater calculations for the First Addition be revised due to the fact that the stormwater from Second and Third Additions flow to different ponds. To address this issue staff has prepared Condition No. 11 in Resolution No. 6213 (Retail Center PUD) which states, "The maximum impervious surface percentage requirement shall be applied to the Highway Business (B 1) zoned property within the entire Dean Lakes development rather than individual phases, subject to the submission of revised stormwater calculations that meet the satisfaction of the City Engineer". Ryan Companies has submitted a spreadsheet and a memo regarding the tracking of'impervious surface percentages for the development as a whole. Please see attached Exhibits 1 and 2 for this information. 3. Since the Planning Commission meeting, Ryan has agreed to modify its signage request to eliminate one of its proposed area identification signs. Ryan is requesting that Condition No. 24 of Resolution No. 6213 be stricken as a result of its intent to comply with the requirements of the City Code. Staffhas not removed Condition No. 24 at this time because staff feels that the inclusion of this condition provides additional clarity that a variance has not been granted for area identification signage. 4. Lowe's expressed concern regarding the proposed conditions related to sidewalk and outdoor display areas. At Planning Commission review, staff recommended that sidewalk display not be allowed east ofthe main entrance for fire protection purposes. Lowe's has worked with the Fire Inspector and has proposed a revised sidewalk display plan. A copy of this plan is attached as Exhibit 3. Specifically, Lowe's is requesting that sidewalk display be limited to what is shown on Exhibit 3 which depicts sidewalk display of seasonal plant materials in front of the garden center and of materials under the canopy of the indoor lumber yard entrance. Staffhas modified Condition No.7 to reflect that compliance would be required with the revised sidewalk display plan. 5. Lowe's has also provided a communication (Exhibit 4) regarding their request for wall signage variance. Specifically, Lowe's is requesting 453 sq. ft. of wall signage on their front wall. Current City Code would allow a maximum of 400 sq. ft. Proposed Condition No. 25 would require compliance with the 400 sq. feet. 6. For Council's reference and comparison, staffhas attached a copy of the resolution and site plan approved for the Home Depot site. Please see attached Exhibit 5. The final plat is in substantial conformance with the proposed preliminary plat. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve Resolution No. ~213, ::ipproving the Retail Center PUD (PUD #26), subject to the conditions presented. 2. Approve Resolution No. 6213, subject to revised conditions. 2 3. Approve Resolution No. 6214, approving the Preliminary and Final Plat for Dean Lakes Third Addition, subject to the conditions presented. 4. Approve Resolution no. 6214, subject to revised conditions. 5. Do not approve the retail center PUD, preliminary and final plat and direct staffto prepare a resolution consistent with the direction of the Council. 6. Table the matter and request additional information from staff and/or the applicant. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative No.1, apptoval of Resolution No. 6213, approving the Retail Center PUD (PUD #26), subject to the conditions presented. Staff recommends Alternative No.3, approval of Resolution No. 6214, approving the Preliminary and Final Plat for Dean Lakes Third Addition, subject to the conditions presented. ACTION REQUESTED Offer a motion approving Resolution No. 6213, approving the Retail Center PUD (PUD #26), subject to the conditions presented., and move its adoption. Offer a motion approving Resolution No. 6214, approving the Preliminary and Final Plat for Dean Lakes Third Addition, subject to the conditions presented, and move its adoption. g: \cc \2005\03-15\retailcenterpudppfpdeanslakes3 .do 3 RESOLUTION NO. 6213 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, APPROVING DEAN LAKES RETAIL CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT #26 WHEREAS, Ryan Companies is the Applicant and Owner of said property; and WHEREAS, the property upon which the request is being made is legally described as follows: Outlots Nand Q, Dean Lakes First Addition, Scott County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee reviewed the request for the Planned Unit Development on March 3, 2005, and recommended its approval; and WHEREAS, all notices ofthe public hearing for the Planned Unit Development were duly sent and posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard . thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the request at its meeting of March 15,2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, as follows: That the Dean Lakes Retail Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 26 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the proposed Lots 1 through 5, Block 1 shall generally comply with the site plan prepared January 20,2005, attached as Exhibit F. The remainder of the parcels are not , required to comply with the schematic site plan illustrated on Exhibit F, however, development of those areas are required to comply with the requirements of the approved retail center PUD and City Code. Additional review process shall be necessary for Conditional Use Permits or request of approval for variations from the retail center PUD or City Code requirements. 2. Development of the Lowe's building shall be consistent with the elevation plans dated January 19, 2005. 3. A CUP allowing a use with a drive through facility is approved for proposed Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, subject to the following conditions: i. Shall be screened to a height of 6 feet from any adjacent residential zone. ii. Shall not have a public address system which is audible from any residential property; and iii. Shall provide stacking for at least 6 vehicles per aisle. The required stacking shall not interfere with internal circulation patterns or with designated parking facilities, and shall not be located in any public right-of-way, private access easement, or within the required parking setback. 4. A CUP allowing a Class II restaurant is approved for proposed Lots 2 and 4, Block 2, subject to the following conditions: 4 i. If serving liquor, shall not be located on a lot or parcel ofland adjacent to any RIA, RIB, or Rl C zone; and ii. If located within 100 feet of a residential use, shall limit its hours of operation to between . 5 am and 11 pm. 5. A CUP allowing an open sales lot in the form of a garden center on Lot 1, Block 1 shall be allowed, subject to the following conditions: i. Shall be screened from any adjacent residential zone; ii. Shall not have a public address system which is audible from any residential property; iii. Shall be kept neat and orderly; iv. Shall not have any uses in any required front, side, or rear yard setback or in any required parking area; and v. Shall not block any sidewalk. 6. No outdoor seasonal sales area shall be allowed on Lot 1 outside the identified perimeter of the garden center. 7. All items available for sale shall be limited to the interior of the principal Lowe's structure and the garden center. Sidewalk sales shall be limited to the areas and materials shown on Sheet 10 dated March 10,2005. No sidewalk display shall be 7.5 feet either side ofthe FDC for fire protection purposes. 8. Rental vehicles (including any motorized vehicle or trailers) shall be parked only within the striped parking stalls of the Lowe's parking lot. 9. No display of items shall be allowed on the exterior walls ofthe building. 10. Shall not have a public address system from any part of the retail center PUD which is audible from any residential property. 11. The maximum impervious surface percentage requirement shall be applied to the Highway Business (B 1) zoned property within the entire Dean Lakes development rather than individual phases, subject to the submission of revised stormwater calculations that meet the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 12. Multiple structures per lot shall be allowed within the PUD subject to the conditions outlined in Section 11.87, Subd. 2.K. 13. The retail center PUD shall allow a zero side yard building setback for Lots 6 and 7, Block 1. 14. The retail center PUD shall allow for zero foot parking lot setbacks from property lines along interior lot lines. 15. The retail center PUD shall allow the exclusion of interior utility easements. 16. Lots without public street frontage shall be allowed if proper cross easements are provided to ensure accessibility. 17. Landscaping requirements shall be verified at the time of building permit review. The applicant shall be required to submit to the City a landscaping bond in an amount equal to 115% of the value of the landscaping to ensure compliance with this section during the first year after planting. 18. Landscaping plans shall be revised to reflect the requested changes listed in the February 2, 2005 memo from the Parks and Recreation Landscape Designer and building permits submissions shall reflect those changes. 19. At the time of building permit review(s), shall submit a lighting plan for the projectarea to verify that on site lighting is not spilling over to adjacent properties and is in compliance with the lighting requireme11ts gfthe City Code. 5 20. All mechanical components, including but not limited to, rooftop components, on site shall be screened. Said screening can be accomplished through painting, paneling or other material as deemed acceptable by the Zoning Administrator. 21. Trash compactors shall be fully screened from view. Other trash receptacles, including but 'not limited to dumpsters, shall be stored in fully enclosed areas, including the top. 22. Building materials used on the sides and rear of the building(s) shall be of the same or similar materials and colors as the front ofthe building(s). 23. Project signage within Dean Lakes Third Addition is limited to the number, size, and height requirements for the project signage as proposed on Page 12 of the Project Narrative for Dean Lakes Third Addition. 24. The area identification signage for the overall Dean Lakes development shall be limited to number, size and height requirements ofthe City Code. 25. Wall signage within Dean Lakes Third Addition shall be limited to the number, size and height requirements of the City Code. 26. Shall provide an internal pedestrian access system to be reviewed at the time of building permit review. 27. Shall provide access points in locations approved by the City Engineer to ensure proper ingress/egress to the site. 28. Staff shall verify that the retail center is in compliance with its requirement prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy within the retail center. 29. Loading facilities shall comply with the requirements of Section 11.63. 30. The ownership, operation and maintenance of the private driveways within the PUD shall be the responsibility of the developer and/or its assigns and shall not be accepted by the City. 31. Irrigation system shall be provided for the landscape islands and perimeter landscaping. 32. Any required or desired noise mitigation, at time of development or some future date, shall be the responsibility ofthe developer and/or their assigns. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the 6th day of July 2004. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk PREPARED BY: City of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee, MN 55379 6 CERTIFICATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 6213 I, Judith S. Cox, City Clerk of the City of Shako pee, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 6213, presented to and adopted by the City Council of the City of Shakopee at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the 15th day of March 2005, as shown by the minutes ofthe meeting in my possession. Dated this _ day of ,2005. Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SEAL 7 RESOLUTION NO. 6214 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF DEAN LAKES THIRD ADDITION WHEREAS, , Ryan Companies, applicant and property owner, has made application for preliminary and final plat approval of Dean Lakes Third Addition; and WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as: Outlots Nand Q, Dean Lakes First Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Scott County, Minnesota;. and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed preliminary plat with conditions; and WHEREAS, on March 15,2005 the City Council reviewed the proposed preliminary and final plats. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota that the preliminary and final plat of Dean Lakes Third Addition is hereby approved subj ect to the following conditions; 1. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the Final Plat: A. The plat applications shall be revised to eliminate the proposed Outlot A from Dean Lakes Third Addition. B. Approval of title by the City Attorney. C. Execution of a Developers Agreement with provisions for Plan A and Plan B improvements, as well as payment of engineering review fees, and any other fees as required by the City's adopted fee schedule. 1. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 2. Electrical system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 3. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 4. Installation of sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems in accordance with the requirements of the Design Criteria and Standard Specifications of the City of Shakopee. 5. The developer shall be responsible for payment of Trunk Storm Water Charges, Trunk Storm Water Storage and Treatment Charges, Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges, security for the public improvements, engineering review fees, and other fees as required by the City's most current Fee Schedule. 8 6. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City Engineer and the Shakopee Public Utility Commission approve the Final Construction Plans and Specifications. 7. Developer shall pay existing levied special assessments ormay request with the application for the final plat, that special assessments be reapportioned against new lots. If request is approved, developer shall pay the current fee for reapportioning assessments and agree to the City Engineers reapportionment. 8. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approvals/permits for proposed improvements within the Scott County right-of-way. 9. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approvals/permits for proposed improvements within the City of Shako pee's right-of-way and drainage and utility easements. D. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. E. All proposed sanitary sewer and storm sewer shall be private. The survey data (length and bearings) shall be shown for each lot. F. Temporary street signs shall be provided until such time that permanent street signs are installed. G. Shall provide electronic (Auto CAD) files of the Final Plat to the Engineering Department. H. The applicant shall address all comments made by City staff on the submitted plan sets. The requested revisions will be forwarded to the applicant for their use. II. Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following conditions shall apply; A. Building construction, sewer, water service, fire protection and access will be reviewed for code compliance at the time of building permit application(s). B. Construction debris shall be contained. Any windblown construction debris shall be collected weekly. C. The developer and/or their assigns shall be responsible for any required or desired noise mitigation measures. D. The developer and/or their assigns shall be responsible for the maintenance of all areas held in common ownership. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the _ day of , 2005. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk 9 ~XHI8/r .1- RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. iYAH 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 BUILDING lASTING RELATIONSHIPS 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-30001ax MEMO TO Julie Klima DATE Mar. 9,2005 FROM Lee Koppy SUBJECT Dean Lakes 3rd Addition - Supplemental informantion for Council meeting CC Michael Leek The Planning Commission recommended approval of Dean Lakes 3rd Addition subject to the 32 conditions listed in the staff report. Thank you for taking the time to meet with us since that meeting to discuss these conditions. It is our understanding that the total aggregate development of the 44 acres of property in the Dean Lakes project that is zoned as Bl, may not exceed the City's maximum impervious coverage of 75%. We have prepared a spreadsheet that Ryan and the City will use to track the actual impervious coverage for each of the lots as they are developed to assure that this value is not exceeded. This spreadsheet could be introduced as Exhibit H Ryan has also agreed to remove Outlot 0, the conservation easement to the south of the proposed Retail PUD, from the proposed Dean Lakes 3rd Addition Plat. Ryan also agreed to remove the two "Area Identification" signs located on the northeast and southeast corners of County Road 83 and Dean Lakes Boulevard. Based on this discussion, we encourage staff to have a list of alternative conditions available for the Council, if they agree '-Vith this recent discussion. The conditions in the Planning Commission recommendation that conflict with this new information are: #1 and #11. We believe thatrevising the conditions as follows would accurately represent our discussion: 1.) Development of the proposed Dean Lakes Third Addition shall generally comply with the site plan prepared January 20, 2005, attached as Exhibit F. 11.) The maximum impervious surface for the Dean Lakes Third Addition will be evaluated using the table on Exhibit H. This table restricts the impervious coverage within the Bl-zoned property in the Dean Lakes development to 75% maximum. The maximum impervious surface percentage requirements shall be applied to the B 1 property as a whole, rather than individual lots. We also request that you suggest that Condition #24 be stricken, since we are proposing to remove the "Area Identification" signage from this application, and that an additional Condition #33 be added: 33.) Outlot 0, Dean Lakes First Addition, proposed as Outlot A, Dean Lakes Third Addition will be removed from the proposed plat. SITE DATA FOR B1 - HIGHWAY BUSINESS PROPOSED wI RETAIL PUD PROPOSED wI BUILDING PERMIT Lot Impervious Impervious Building Parking Stalls per Lot Impervious Impervious Building Parking Stalls per Area Area Percent Area Count 200 SF Area Area Percent Area Count 200 SF (Ac.) (Ac.) (%) (SF) (#) (#) (Ac.) (Ac.) (%) (SF) (#) (#) ..................................................................................... ..................................... ..................................... .....~.............................. ...................................... ...................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... Dean Lakes 2nd Addition ..................................................................................... ..................................... .............................-...... .....~.............................. ..................................... ...................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ...........~.................. ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................................................................... ..................................... ..................................... .................................- ................................... ...................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... Block 1 ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... t:Qt1................................................................. ..........................~:.~1. ..........................o:-ijij ....."'..............18...ijo/~ .......................5:500. ................42................ ...............i':'53............ ...........................3':3.i. ..........................0.:60 18.0% .......................5.)500 ................42............... ..............!.:?~............- ~~!:~C:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ..................................... ::::::::::::::::::::?~::~%: .:::::::::::::::::::::::~;~:o.:o.: ...................................... :::::::::::::::6.::!~::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::I~~. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::I~~ ::::::::::::::::::::::?:~:~% :::::::::::::::::::::::~;~:6.Q ................21................ 4.64 1.33 21 .......;......o..:!.~............. ..................................... ..................................... ...................................... ..................................... ...............................................-.................................... ..................................... ..................................... ......~............................. ..................................... ...................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... Block 2 ..................................... ..................................... ...................................... ..................................... ~!?U.........::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ..........................?:.~.13. ...........................1.:.11.:3. ::::::::::::::::::::?~::~%: ::::::::::::::::::::?Q;:o.:o.:o.: ...............1.Q~.............. ..............{.o.s............. ...........................2:46 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::I~? ::::::::::::::::::::::~t.;~% ::::::::::::::::::::?:6.;QQQ :::::::::::::::J::6.~:::::::::::::: ..............!.:.9.~............. ..................................... ..................................... Lot 2 1.48 ..........................Q:.~.9. 60.7% 4,200 25 1.19 1.48 0.98 66.2% 4,230 25 ..............1.:~.~............. ~~!I::::::::::::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~::::: ..................................... ::::::::::::::::::::~?~~~~ :::::::::::::::::::::::~;:?:Q:Q. :::::::::::::::::t.t.::::::::::::::: .......'"'"'2.""4.8............ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::I~? ::::::::::::::::::::::::::I?~ ::::::::::::::::::::::t.t.;?% :::::::::::::::::::::::~;QQQ ................68............... ...........................!.:.13.? ..........................~.:.~Q. ..................................... ..................................... ..............1.:!.Q............. ~!?~..~......................................................................... 1.68 ...........................!.:.?13. ....."..............?~:.9..r.? .......................~!.?QQ. ...............~.~.~.............. ..............~:.1l.1............. ............................!:!.!.0. ............................!:!.!~ ............................!:!.!!.': ............................~.ff.l: ..............!:!!.0............... ..............!:!!A.............. ..................................... ~!?!..?......................................................................... ...........................!.:.~.9. ...........................1.:.?1. ....."'.............~~:.?r.? .......................~!.?QQ. ...............~.Q~.............. ..............~:.~.?............ ...........................1.:~Q ...........................!.:?? ......................Il.!..:.!.J.? .......................!5.}.~gg. ...............!.?.9............... ..............~.:!.~............. ~!?!.f3.......................................................................... 2.55 1.73 ....................~.!.:.ll.r.? ....................~~!.13.O'Q. 122 ..............Q:.13.?............ N/A ............................!:!!~ ............................~!.~ ............................~.ff.l: ..............!:!!.6.............. ............Ji!.~............. ..................................... ..................................... ...................................... ..................................... ..................................................................................... ..................................... ..................................... ......~............................. ..................................... ...................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................................................................... ..................................... ..................................... .....~.............................. ..................................... ...................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... Dean Lakes 3rd Addition ..................................................................................... ..................................... ..................................... .....~.............................. ..................................... ...................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................-............... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................................................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..-............................ ..................................... ...................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... Block 1 ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... t:Qt1................................................................. ........................!.~:.g.? 11.43 ....................87...8%. ..................1.69)9.3. ...............579.............. ..............0:.68............ ............................NIA ............................NiA ............................N/A ............................N.iA ..............NIA............. N!A ~~!:?:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::Q::~:Q. ::::::::::::::::::::~~::~~~ :::::::::::::::::::::::~;:?:o.:Q: ...................................... ::::::::::::::?;:Q:~:::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~i.f.:. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~!.6 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::8'i.f.; ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::fJi.A ::::::::::::::B.i.f.::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::WA::::::::::::: ...........................!.:.~.1. ................13~................ Lot 3 ...........................!.:.?.9. 0.81 67.5% 3,500 35 2.00 N!A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ~~({:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::Q;:~:~ :::::::::::::::::::::?~::?%: ::::::::::::::::::::::::~;:o.:o.:o.: ...................................... :::::::::::::::I;:~T:::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::B:!.~' ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::f.!.i:f.: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::f.!.if.; :::::::::::::::::::::::::::H!~ ::::::::::::::B:!.~:::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::f.!.i.~:::::::::::::: ...........................!.:.?.9. ................~~................ ~!?!.?......................................................................... ...........................!.:.~.? ...........................!.:Q.ll. ....................?.1.:.1.~. ........................!.,.!.QQ. 85 2.21 ............................!:!!i~ ............................~.!:~ ............................!:!!.A ............................~!.A ............J'i!.~.............. ..............~!.A.............. ...................................... ..................................... Lot 6 ..........................~:.~.13. ..........................?:.~.~. 69.9% .....................?Q,Q'O'Q. 150 .=:::::::~::~:~:::::::::::: N/A NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A ~~(t.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:~::::::::: ..........................~:.?I!!. ..........................?:.13.? :::::::::::::::::::::~Q~~oj; ....................~Q,Q.O'Q. ::::::::::::::)~~:::::::::::= ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::B.i.f.: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::Hit; :::::::::::::::::::::::::::Hi.A ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::8iA :::::::::::::::~!.i;::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::~:!.~:::::::::::::: ............................................................................-....... ..................................... ..................................... ....~............................... ..................................... ...................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... !.~~.~!...~.~...~!..~.P.~~y................................ 44.30 30.16 68.1% ..................~~~1.~.~.~. 1714 0.94 14.91 7.04 47.2% ....................~~/.~~~. 391 1.61 ..................................... ..................................... ....~............................... ...................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ~ ::t --- ~ ....... '-i ~ . I . I fI (( . J) REVISIONS . I I I II): 0.-:::.': "'=~ (( )) """ OESCllPllC>< I I (( J) ~ I 1) (( J) . E.---:: =- . = ..... .... =- . F= E::: = E = . =>:.-'::.::' E= - -- - ----'- -,-- .' -,-- ~ . '-'-'-'-'-.: '.-.-.-.-.-. 6'\ ----,-. V <D STRIPING TO BE RED IN' '. .(1,0 . o'Q COLOR AND 2' O/C ~ o'Q - g: !' :<1. I ~ ~ -~... ~ o'Q - -jiJi I( '..-' . _ ~ .1.2 '& ~ < ~. - "'" ~ H . < ~. - nC\. ~ .. "iH ~ l.:;<> .-'~ > ' ~ . ~ "'" -.~ > :l! "'- ' ..,.. . .. Jl. ~ cr' ~ .-.-...,:,...-.-.'....-.':.-..-..:.::.::..-.-...- .- . ........ ..:.-'" . ...... . . .:".............:.-.- .-.-.- ...::......:::::. ::::':.. .'" ... . ,:.-....-:::.-.-. " I W ,P i w'j -+:4 . -+ ~ . ~. .. ._~*~. ...tt<... ..:-+. .. /.'=='~' ;::':1 .... .....;.=- . 'L' /Or NVYl ~ [l If! i i [l m ~ I..:::::::=.J II ' . I I I II n!~ . ;"...." .M . 'i~ ._._ ._. I ..... 0'\ ....v-'- ,.............. 1_______1 '! I . ;'.V =-=-===... I j ,~~ ~ . lfty1 '-~ [ v.v1 g:s'. ~ I ~.. _. " ~I': .~. .' ... . I -'---.:......... 0 . I -.~ en FIREDEfARTMENT . _ --c -.J ~"- . '-CONNE< nON (SIAMESE) I ~I ~J' W I "v a ~ '. I.. / / /./v.v. / /.../.././ '/'/ ././ / /././ /./, //. /.. '0 . . ", .... p~sw PLANT~.sw P~SW PlA~sw. PlANTTABlES-SW p~sw V .: - "r<.I;IAI1'4U'4_V -/IU:~IAININu' (I~.c._!J\1J.':1IJ'.Ju' (""~~~!N... (R-tI:AIN1Nu' r",,":.~I.~!N<..t. , WALL _VIALL WALL I WAlL WAlL WALL ::':: ENOCAP ':"FNDCAP ENOCAP ENOCAP ENDCAP END AP v. . . ~ ,: w <" w ::J: "" J: w w ui 2 '-'-::"''''I''I::r: ':"'T'I:r ~ ~ r- ~ ',-,', "'x 'TI::r:..:( If ~~ ?i~ I ~ "I ~ " ?i~ ~ll. I ::1' ~ ; .-:. r.- ~ r- ~-. I,: ~ V < ~ ~ ~ ~ I a. 1I ~ GnWERCATYl GROWER CARTS GROWER CARTS GROWER CARTS 1M GROWERCAlUS GRnOWERCA~RTS GR_-nOWERCARTS. is . ~ i~ I 'Q . 'Ill I 'QI 'Ill II 'Q 'QI I 'Q "" 'Q 'Q ~ '" 05. C'I"I >_ ml --:,m[ . nil l"tl >~ ,.., ._~., M . "... 0 LLJ ~ . . . g ..d~~~i~ ._:+. GARDEN CENTER DISIDLAY ~ .~~~Ii.~ '.' --==~ 10 rl:\ . ....n-a. .~ eXHIBIT 1- Lowe's Midwest Real Estate Office 1952 McDowell Road, Suite 101 Naperville, IL 60563 Phone: 630-548-7500 Ill1prO'lingQ!J1n~ 11l1provemf)nt. Fax: 630-527-8830 MEMO To: Julie Klima Date: March 10, 2005 From: Robert Fiebig III Subject: Lowe's of Shakopee - Supplemental information for Council meeting As per our discussion with you, we would like to request some changes to the conditions that were approved at Planning Commission on March 3, 2005. Please see below. Condition 6: Per our discussions yesterday we have determined that we will remove the outdoor seasonal sales area that was shown adjacent to the garden center. Due to these modifications, we recommend that Condition #6 be stricken as it does not apply to anything we show on our revised Outdoor Display Area Exhibit (sheet 10). Condition 7: Per our discussions we have reduced the amount of sidewalk sales display areas from what was originally presented at Planning Commission. We suggest that Condition #7 be revised as stated below. 7.) All items available for sale shall be limited to the interior of the principal Lowe's structure and the garden center. Sidewalk sales will be limited to the areas shown on Sheet 10 dated March 10,2005. No sidewalk display shall be 7.5' either side of the FDC for fire protection purposes. Condition 25: Given the importance of the Highway 169 frontage, Lowe's is proposing to place all wall signage on the front elevation. All three signs proposed total 453 SF. As discussed at Planning Commission, Lowe's is requesting a slight variation from the allowable 400 SF (53 SF Total). Please consider the Lowe's monument that is proposed along County Road 83 is much smaller than what is required. We have reduced that square footage knowing we are requesting a signage variation on the building signage. We suggest that Condition #25 be revised as stated below. 25.) Lowe's wall signage shall be limited to the number, size and height shown on the building elevations dated January 21, 2005. Wall signage within Dean Lakes Third Addition (excluding Lowe's) shall be limited to the number, size and height requirements of the City Code. We've attached the revised Outdoor Display Area Exhibit for your use. It is Lowe's intention to bring additional information on sidewalk sales (photos of existing stores with sidewalk displays and a perspeCtive showing what Low~'s proposes for sidewalk display). 3/10/05 1fOHh l?XHjBlT f) V6Po-r A~t. A RESOLUTION NO. 5858 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKO PEE, MINNESOTA, APPROVING SOUTHBRIDGE EAST RETAIL CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT #21 WHEREAS, Shakopee Crossings Limited Partnership is the Applicant and Owner of said property; and WHEREAS, the property upon which the request is being made is legally described as follows: Outlot A, Riverside Grove rt Addition, Scott County, Minnesota; and ~1-,35"t -04g-"/ WHEREAS, the Planning Commission ofthe City of Shakopee reviewed the request for the Plam1ed Unit Development on February 6, 2002, and recommended its approval; and WHEREAS, all notices of the public hearing for the Planned Unit Development were duly sent and posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council review~d the request at its meetings of February 18,2003. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, as follows: That the Southbridge East Retail Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 21 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the site shall generally comply with the site plan dated March 3, 2003, and received by the City on March 4, 2003, attached as Exhibit B. Development of the area identified as Outlot A is not required to comply with the schematic site plan illustrated on Exhibit B, however, development of that area is required to comply with the requirements of the PUD and City Code. Additional review process shall be necessary for Conditional Use Permits or request of approval for variations from the PUD or City Code requirements. 2. An open sales lot in the form of a garden center shall be allowed on Lot 1 subject to the conditions outlined as a part of the PUD approval and as generally depicted on Exhibit B. 3. No outdoor seasonal sales area shall be allowed except the garden center. 4. Open sales lots or any use having exterior storage of goods for sale shall be screened from any adjacent residential zone. S. Open sales lots or any use having exterior storage of goods for sale shall be kept neat and orderly. 6. Open sales lots or any use having exterior storage of goods for sale shall not have any uses in any required front, side or rear yard setback or in any required parking area. 7. Shall not have a public address system from any part of the facility that is audible fro111 any residential property. 8. Approval of the temporary and right in/right out access depicted on the site plan for the PUD is contingent upon the applicant receiving approval and access permits fro111 Scott County in the locations depicted on Exhibit B. Multiple structures per lot shall be allowed within the PUD subject to the conditions outlined in S~~tion 11.87, Subd. 2.K. 1 ....." exHIBlr~ , 9. Architectural design and building materials shall be as depicted 011 the drawing titled "GF A Project # 20020432, City Submittal- 03/05/03." 1 O. The orange stripe depicted on the front elevation for the Home Depot store shall be allowed, but shEllI be limited to twelve inches (12") in width. There shall not be an orange stripe 011 either the sides or rear of the building. . 11. All items available for sale shall be limited to the principal Home Depot structure, the uutdoor garden center as proposed to be expanded to 28,000 square feet more or less, alld the area designated "sidewalk sales display" area indicated on Exhibit B). 12. Rental vehicles (including any motorized vehicle or trailers) shall be parked only within the striped parking stalls ofthe Home Depot parking lot. 13. No display of items shall be allowed on the sidewalk except as indicated 011 the plans submitted with the original application, nor shall display of items be allowed on the exterior walls of the building. 14. Landscaping requirements shall be verified at the time of building pennit review. The applicant shall be required to submit to the City a landscaping bond in an amount equal to 115% of the value of the landscaping to ensure compliance with tIllS section during the first year after planting. 15. At the time of building permit review(s), shall submit a lighting plan for the project area to verify that 011 site lighting is.not spilling over to adjacent properties and is in compliance with the lighting requirements of the City Code. 16. All mechanical components, including, but not limited to, rooftop components, on site shaH be screened. Said screening can be accomplished through painting, paneling or other material as deemed acceptable by the Zoning Administrator.. . 17. Trash compactors shall be fully screened from view. Other trash receptacles, including but 110t limited to dUI!lpsters, shall be stored in fully enclosed areas, including the top. 18. Building materials used on the sides and rear of the building( s) shall be of the same or sin1ilar materials and colors as the front of the building(s). 19. Freestanding signage shall be limited to two (2) pylon signs 110t to exceed twenty (20) feet in height and two (2) monument signs not to exceed ten (10 feet in height. All pylon and monument signs shall be limited to the sign area permitted under the City's sign regulations. The design and materials for the pylon and monument signs shall be substantially similar to those depicted in the 2/14/2003 drawings submitted to the Council 20. There shall only be signage on the front ofthe Home Depot store, totaling 110 more than four hundred (400) square feet. 21. Shall.provide an internal pedestrian access system either along the center drive 01' along the southern perimeter of the development. There shall be no signage on the rear or sides of the building. 22. Shall provide acce~s points in locations approved by the City Engineer to ensure proper ingress/egress to the site. 23. Shall allow lots without public street frontage, if property cross easements are provided to ensure accessibility. 24. Uses listed as conditional uses in the underlying zoning district may be allowed within the retail center PUD upon approval by the City Council. Such uses shall be held to standards outlined in . Section 11.87 unless otherwise modified by the City Council. A separate CUP review process shall not be required when these uses are incorporated into the retail center PUD review. 25. Staff shall verify that the retail center is in compliance with its requirement prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy within the retail center. 2 tXffl Brr 5 26. Fellcing materials other than chain link shall be utilized for the fencing areas of the Home Depot garden center and seasonal sales area. 27, Loading facilities shall comply with the requirements of Section 11.63. 28. The ownership, operation and maintenance of the private driveways within the PUD shall be the responsibility of the developer andlor its assigns and shall not be accepted by the City. 29. Irrigation system shall be provided for the landscape islands and perimeter landscaping. 30. The trees along the east boundary of the Home Depot site shall be sized as follows at the time of installation: coniferous trees a minimum of 6 feet and deciduous trees a minimum of 2.5 inches and shall be placed on an 8 foot berm. 31. Delivery oflumber and similar materials to the northermnost loading area of the Home Depot store, as well as garbage removal shall be restricted to between the hours of 6anl and 10 pm. 32. The applicant shall provide the City with funds in escrow or a petition or development agreement for recording wherein the applicant agrees to pay the costs of a future traffic signal at the intersection ofCSAH 18 and Crossings Boulevard. The amowlt of this escrow or agreement to pay the costs shall be in an amount determined by the Public Works Director. Adopted in .~~'./11J' session of the City Council of the CityofSliakopee, Minnesota, held the is'' day of March 2003. b r1 1\ .. --- Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: (7 ~ J!J/ .1.Ia11/;(l?/.. o' !1?'707/.~-:'_./ i. . l~l1!t O(ty Clerk '......r~""V' PREPARED BY: City of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street Shako pee, MN 55379 ., :J . ( r=:"., 'I I ' ... IL- _..J I / " L__~_____________________________________________~______ I II I II F---------------------------------------9 ~~- rn-rfilTlr--rn GREENBERG FARROW ARCHITECTURE It fTnlTlfTnlTl r-, r-, fTnlTlfTnlTl r-, I '/ Ir-i LlLUIJLJ.U.Jl.J 1--.4 FUTURE 1--.4 LIU.Jl.JLlLUJ.J 1--.4: ARCHITECTURE ENCHNEERINO DEVELOPMENT ------ L --11 Ir-i LU.JIU1JLUJ . . . I II--J ~ENTlAL DEVELOEMENT. ... r-il 34!! SALT CREEK LANE surre 100. ARUNGrONHEIQl1S, Il 6000S !L.J rnlTTlfTnlTl ~~ ~~ fTnlTlnTrni ~~I 11--1 VOlCE 1471788.9200 FAA aQ1788.!1!37 f 11--\ fTrllTn,rTn LlLUIJLJ.LUIJ L....J L....J JILU.LJLJ.LUl.J L-j IL....J L,LUIU1JLLU i- I ~ I -=--- I f T nl T 1 rrll CROSSINGS BL YD. 'i '".~, ~:: ... "'" L1LU1J LLU -" :;., OUTlOT B rnlTrt 2.523.476.09 .q.fL LJ.UJIJ 57.93 ACRES . 77,000 S,F. 43,000 S.F. LOCATION MAP PROJECT INFORMATION SITE AREA THE HDME DEPOT :l: 12.11 }C. HOME DEPOT STORE DATA SASE BUILDING 102.513 SF OUTDOOR GARDEN CENTER 27.988 SF TOTAL BUILDING MEA. 130.501 SF PAR~NGCOUNTSUMMARY PROVIDED Il'( HOME DEPaT . <\81SP FROf'(l' I'lElJl C'lERFlOW 24 SP 1vr~ /1000 GFA) 505 SP REQUIRED Il'( CIlY 505 SP ;ZONING CLASSIFICATION EXISllNG B-1: BUSINESS HIGHWAY PROPOSED B-1: BUSINESS HIGHWAY PROJECT NOTES I. THIS CONCEPllJAL SITE PlAN IS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY: SITE SPECIFIC INFORl.II.llON SUCH IS EXISIlNG CONomoNS. ZONING. PARKING LANOSCAPE REDUIREI.lEIfTS MUST BE VERIFIED. 2. 'IHIS SITE PIAN IS IlASEO ON A SITE PLAN PROVIDED Il'( WES'IWOOOS PROFESSIONAl. SERVICES INC., RECElVEO 1!lt'&/02; AND A SITE PLAN FROId KlCE AACHrTECTS, DATED Wi 15, 2002- DRAWING ISSUE/REVISION RECORD DA N 07/18/0 INIT1AI. REl.E.oISE RCId 10/10/02 REVISED PARKING AND PROTOTYPE RCId . l~~~g~ ~ro...~~ r:tr:fff PROTOTYPE RCId ROloC 02/1..../03 REVISED GARDEN CENTER RCloC 03/03103 INSERlED CART CORRALS RCM -- . REAL ESTATE MANAGER PLATT SITE DEV. COORDINATOR lAAXWEU.. It. Eo MARKET' twIN emES (SUBURIlAN) R. l!.AGENDA NAME SlW<OPEE, loCN \ ElTHEHOME DEPOT \ SHAKOPEE, MN '-- (SEe) 169 Be 18 HOMS DEPOT STORE NUMBER 2841 GFA PROJECT NUMBER 20020432.2 E8 ifnrT~ I I I I 01004080 160 2010 300 FOR REVIEW MN-91fc:x;'; ...... qjJ~lH'tJ J PURPOSES ONLY ,'T~ f JV CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Shakopee Planning Commission FROM: Julie Klima, Planner II SUBJECT: Dean Lakes Third Addition Preliminary Plat and Retail Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) MEETING DATE: March 3, 2005 REVIEW PERIOD: January 20 - May 20,2005 CASELOG NO.: 05-029 Site Information Applicant: Ryan Companies Property Owner: Ryan Companies Location: South ofHwy. 169, East ofCSAH 83 and North ofCSAH 16 Current Zoning: Highway Business (B 1) Adjacent Zoning: North: Highway Business (Bl) South: Planned Residential District (pRD) West: CSAH 83 East: Business Park (BP)/Medium Density Residential (R2) Comp Plan: Commercial MUSA: The site is within the MUSA boundary. Introduction: Ryan Companies has submitted an application for Preliminary and Final Plat of Dean Lakes Third Addition and a Retail Center PUD. The Planning Commission is asked to consider the preliminary Plat and Retail Center PUD only. Final Plats are no longer reviewed by the Planning Commission. The subject site is a portion of the overall Dean Lakes PUD previously approved by the City Council. The specific area subject to this application is located north of CSAH 16, south of Dean Lakes Blvd. and west of Dean Lakes Trail (please see Exhibit A). The applicant has submitted a narrative explaining their requests. A copy of this narrative is attached for the Commission's reference. Attached as Exhibit B is a copy of the Overall Area Sketch for the whole Dean Lakes project. The preliminary plat and retail center PUD only addresses the originally platted Outlots N, 0, and Q. Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat proposes the creation of seven lots in what was originally platted as Outlots N and Q, and one outlot (originally platted as Outlot 0, but now proposed as Outlot A). Please see Exhibit C for a copy of the proposed preliminary plat. The proposed Outlot A does not propose any different use or configuration from the time it was originally platted. This outlot is subject to a conservation easement that was put in place with the platting of Dean Lakes First Addition. Staff has communicated with the applicant, its concern about the inclusion of this outlot in the plat (please see Exhibit D). Staff believes that this outlot does not need to be included in the plat application because no changes are being proposed to it. Staff believes that the issue of landscaping within this conservation easement area could be adequately addressed by the appropriate review b~ards and staff outside of the preliminary plat process. Staff is recommending a condition that this outlot be eliminated from the preliminary and final plat applications. If this 1.84 acre outlot is removed from the plat applications, the site, as proposed, does not meet the impervious surface requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, eliminating the outlot would require the applicant to revise the site plan to create more pervious area than currently exists in their application. Park dedication for this development was addressed with the final plat of Dean Lakes First Addition and does not need to be addressed with this plat. The Engineering Department has provided comment which has been attached as Exhibit E. Staffhas incorporated the appropriate conditions of approval into the recommendation contained within this report. The Finance Department has commented that the existing special assessments shall be reapportioned and the fee for reapportionment shall be applied. Shakopee Public Utilities (SPUC) has commented that all existing watermain stubs have to be looped together including the 12 inch watermain stub located on the south side of the site. The 12 inch watermain will have to be extended through the conservation easement area into the site. Time Warner Cable has commented that any adjusting or relocating of existing facilities is subject to reimbursement, to Time Warner Cable, applicable costs of relocation/adjustment and subject to scheduling of work requested. Staff has provided the following list of conditions for the Planning Commission to consider for the Preliminary Plat of Dean Lakes Third Addition: I. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the Final Plat: A. The plat applications shall be revised to eliminate the proposed Outlot A from Dean Lakes Third Addition. B. Approval of title by the City Attorney. 2 C. Execution of a Developers Agreement with provisions for Plan A and Plan B improvements, as well as payment of engineering review fees, and any other fees as required by the City's adopted fee schedule. 1. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 2. Electrical system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 3. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements ofthe Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. . 4. Installation of sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems in accordance with the requirements of the Design Criteria and Standard Specifications of the City of Shakopee. 5. The developer shall be responsible for payment of Trunk Storm Water Charges, Trunk Storm Water Storage and Treatment Charges, Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges, security for the public improvements, engineering review fees, and other fees as required by the City's most current Pee Schedule. 6. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City Engineer and the Shakopee Public Utility Commission approve the Final Construction Plans and Specifications. 7. Developer shall pay existing levied special assessments or may request with the application for the fmal plat, that special assessments be reapportioned against new lots. If request is approved, developer shall pay the current fee for reapportioning assessments and agree to the City Engineers reapportionment. 8. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approvals/permits for proposed improvements within the Scott County right-of-way. 9. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approvals/permits for proposed improvements within the City of Shakopee's right-of- way and drainage and utility easements. D. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. E. All proposed sanitary sewer and storm sewer shall be private. The survey data (length and bearings) shall be shown for each lot. P. Temporary street signs shall be provided until such time that permanent street signs are installed. G. Shall provide electronic (Auto CAD) files ofthe Pinal Plat to the Engineering Department. H. The applicant shall address all comments made by City staff on the submitted plan sets. The requested revisions will be forwarded to the applicant for their use. II. Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following conditions shall apply; 3 A. Building construction, sewer, water service, fire protection and access will be reviewed for code compliance at the time of building permit application(s). B. Construction debris shall be contained. Any windblown construction debris shall be collected weekly. C. The developer and/or their assigns shall be responsible for any required or desired noise mitigation measures. D. The developer and/or their assigns shall be responsible for the maintenance of all areas held in common ownership. Planned Unit Development The Retail Center PUD is proposed only for the area that are currently Outlots N and Q (Outlot 0, the conservation easement area, is not proposed for inclusion in the Retail Center PUD). Please see Exhibit F for a copy ofthe proposed retail center PUD. Section 11.50, Subd. 4 outlines the requirements of retail center PUD's. As a part of the retail center PUD, the applicant is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) for Lots 1 through 5. Specifically, the CUP requests are for: 1. An open sales lot in the form of a garden center on Lot 1 (the proposed Lowe's site); 2. Driveup or drive through window CUP for Lots 3 and 4; and 3. Class II restaurant CUP for Lots 2 and 5. The Retail Center PUD portion of the Code states that uses listed as conditional uses in the underlying zoning district may be allowed within a retail center PUD upon approval by the City Council. A separate CUP process shall not be required when the request for CUP is reviewed concurrently with the retail center PUD. Any future uses requiring a CUP in the underlying B 1 district would be required to go through the CUP process. Listed below are the standard conditions applied to Class II restaurants, uses having a drive through and an open sales lot. Staff has incorporated the standard conditions for these uses as conditions of approval for the PUD. The Commission may add any conditions it deems appropriate. Uses having a drive'-up. or drive through window: . Shall be screened to a height of6 feet from any adjacent residential zone. . Shall not have a public address system which is audible from any residential property; and . Shall provide stacking for at least 6 vehicles per aisle. The required stacking shall not interfere with internal circulation patterns or with designated parking facilities, and shall not be located in any public right-of-way, private access easement, or within the required parking setback. Class II restaurants: . If serving liquor, shall not be located on a lot or parcel of land adjacent to any RIA, RIB, or RIC zone; aIl4 4 . If located within 100 feet of a residential use, shall limit its hours of operation to between 5 am and 11 pm. Open Sales Lots . Shall be screened from any adjacent residential zone; . Shall not have a public address system which is audible from any residential property; . Shall be kept neat and orderly; . Shall not have any uses in any required front, side, or rear yard setback, or in any required parking area; and . Shall not block any sidewalks. The PUD drawing illustrates proposed uses on all lots within the retail center PUD. These uses represent the applicant's intentions at the present time. Because the applicant is requesting CUP's for uses on Lots 1 - 5, any development on these lots which would substantially deviate from this site plan may require further review through the PUD amendment or CUP amendment processes. It is the intention of staff to draft the PUD approval in such a way to allow development to occur on the remaining parcels of the site so long as the development meets the requirements outlined in the retail center PUD approval and other applicable design standards of the code (setbacks, building materials, etc.). Additional review of the retail center PUD would be required in instances where a CUP of the underlying zone is required or if a variation to the PUD or City Code was requested, etc. The City Code requires one parking space per 200 square feet of floor area within a retail center. Because the site is being reviewed as a retail center, parking is required to meet standards for overall parking provisions rather than individual site requirements. The parking facilities currently proposed by the applicant exceeds the 1 parking stall per 200 square feet requirement of the City Code. The parking requirements will be verified at the time of either CUP or building permit approval for individual users, as well as, the overall PUD. The City's Park and Landscape Designer has provided comments as attached on Exhibit G. Staff is recommending that the landscape plan comments be addressed as part of the landscape plan to be reviewed at the time of building permit review. The retail center PUD standards include a condition requiring a landscaped buffer 100 feet wide from any residential zone. The property proposed for the retail center PUD is separated from residentially zoned property by Dean Lakes Trail (with a right-of-way width of 66 feet), as well as the setbacks provided to the residential structures. Staff believes this separation meets the spirit and intent of the provision within the Zoning Ordinance. S Requested Variations 1) Imoervious Surface Area The applicant is requesting that as part of the retail center that they be allowed to apply the maximum impervious surface percentage requirements to the overall retail center as opposed to jndividual lots. Staff has interpreted that the maximum impervious surface percentage would be applied to the overall retail center PUD rather than with individual users. Use of this interpretation would require the developer to track with the development of each parcel, the amount of impervious surface percentage provided to ensure that upon completion of development, the requirement for impervious surface area is satisfied. If the Commission disagrees with this interpretation, it should revise or include a condition as necessary. 2) Siflnage The applicant. is requesting that a variation be considered to allow wall signage on the Lowe's building which would measure 453 square feet in size (over a total of 3 wall signs). The recent text amendment adopted by City Council allows developers the right to compile the total amount of signage allowed on their building (in this case, 400 square feet) and distribute it accordingly. The applicant is requesting to be allowed to exceed that requirement by 53 square feet. Staff has included a draft condition requiring compliance with the sign ordinance for wall signage. If the Commission disagrees with this recommendation, it will need to revise that condition accordingly. Commission members should also note the signage proposals listed on page 12 of the narrative. This portion of the narrative addresses in detail the project signs and area identification signs proposed for this develop~ent. The area identification signage proposed would exceed the number and size . required by City Code. Staff has incorporated conditions to address these proposals. Specifically, staff is recommending that the area identification signage be required to comply with City Code and that project signage be consistent with the proposal on Page 12 of the narrative. 3) Building Setbacks for Lots 6 and 7 The applicant is requesting that as a part of the retail center PUD, that construction on Lots 6 and 7 be allowed to occur with a zero setback on the common lot line. These lots propose the construction of buildings. for general retail purposes. Staff views this request to be consistent with the purpose and intent of the retail center PUD. 4) Parking Setbacks for Entire Retail Center PUD The applicant is requesting that as a part of the retail center PUD, that the parking setbacks not be required along property lines, but rather be allowed to cross property lines. Staff believes this. request is consistent with the intention of the provision for parking requirements to be calculated over the development as a whole, rather than on individual sites. 5) Drainage and Utility Easements 6 The applicant is requesting to be allowed to exclude the interior utility easements within the retail center PUD. The applicant has stated that this request would allow them the opportunity to relocate lot lines for secured users if necessary, without having to go through the formal vacation process necessary to vacate drainage and utility easements. The Engineering Department supports this request. Staff has inserted a condition that would allow the lots without interior drainage and utility easements. Staff proposes the following conditions be imposed as part of the Planned Unit Development: 1. Development of the proposed Lots 1 through 5, Block 1 shall generally comply with the site plan prepared January 20, 200S, attached as Exhibit F. The remainder of the parcels are not required to comply with the schematic site plan illustrated on Exhibit F, however, development of those areas are required to comply with the requirements of the approved retail center PUD and City Code. Additional review process shall be necessary for Conditional Use Permits or request of approval for variations from the retail center PUD or City Code requirements. I 2. Development of the Lowe's building shall be consistent with the elevation plans dated January 19, 200? 3. A CUP allowing a use with a drive through facility is approved for proposed Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, subject to the following conditions: i. Shall be screened to a height of 6 feet from any adjacent residential zone. ii. Shall not have a public address system which is audible from any residential property; and iii. Shall provide stacking for at least 6 vehicles per aisle. The required stacking shall not interfere with internal circulation patterns or with designated parking facilities, and shall not be located in any public right-of-way, private access easement, or within the required parking setback. 4. A CUP allowing a Class II restaurant is approved for proposed Lots 2 and 4, Block 2, subject to the following conditions: i. If serving liquor, shall not be located on a lot or parcel of land adjacent to any RIA, RIB, or Rl C zone; and ii. If located within 100 feet of a residential use, shall limit its hours of operation to between 5 am and 11 pm. 5. A CUP allowing an open sales lot in the form of a garden center on Lot I, Block 1 shall be allowed, subject to the following conditions: i. Shall be screened from any adj acent residential zone; ii. Shall not have a public address system which is audible from any residential property; iii. Shall be kept neat and orderly; iv. Shall not have any uses in any required front, side, or rear yard setback or in any required parking area; and r v. Shall not block any sidewalk. 6. No outdoor seasonal sales area shall be allowed on Lot 1 outside the identified perimeter ofthe garden center. 7 7. All items available for sale shall be limited to the interior of the principal Lowe's structure, the garden center, and sidewalk sales display shall be limited to the area between the main entrance and the entrance to the Indoor Lumber Yard, as depicted on Sheet 10 of the January 20,2005 plan set. No sidewalk display shall extend easterly ofthe main entrance for fire protection purposes. 8. Rental vehicles (including any motorized vehicle or trailers) shall be parked only within the striped parking stalls of the Lowe's parking lot. 9. No display of items shall be allowed on the exterior walls of the building. 10. Shall not have a public address system from any part of the retail center PUD which is audible from any residential property. .. 11. The maximum impervious surface percentage requirement shall be applied to the retail center PUD as a whole, rather than individual lots. 12. Multiple structures per lot shall be allowed within the PUD subject to the conditions outlined in Section 11.87, Subd. 2.K. 13. The retail center PUD shall allow a zero side yard building setback for Lots 6 and 7, Block 1. 14. The retail center PUD shall allow for zero foot parking lot setbacks from property lines along interior lot lines. IS. The retail center PUD shall allow the exclusion of interior utility easements. 16. Lots without public street frontage shall be allowed if proper cross easements are provided to ensure accessibility. 17. Landscaping requirements shall be verified at the time of building permit review. The applicant shall be required to submit to the City a landscaping bond in an amount equal to llS% of the value of the landscaping to ensure compliance with this section during the first year after planting. 18. Landscaping plans shall be revised to reflect the requested changes listed in the February 2,2005 memo from the Parks and Recreation Landscape Designer and building permits submissions shall reflect those changes. 19. At the time of building permit review(s), shall submit a lighting plan for the project area to verifythat on site lighting is not spilling over to adjacent properties and is in compliance with the lighting requirements of the City Code. 20. All mechanical components, including but not limited to, rooftop components, on site shall be screened. Said screening can be accomplished through painting, paneling or other material as deemed acceptable by the Zoning Administrator. 21. Trash compactors shall be fully screened from view. Other trash receptacles, including but not limited to dumpsters, shall be stored in fully enclosed areas, including the top. 22. Building materials used on the sides and rear of the building(s) shall be of the same or similar materials and colors as the front of the building(s). 23. Project siganage within Dean Lakes Third Addition is limited to the number, size, and height requirements for the project signage as proposed on Page 12 of the Project Narrative for Dean Lakes Third Addition. 24. The area identification. signage for the overall Dean Lakes development shall be limited to number, size and height requirements of the City Code. 25. Wall signage within Dean Lakes Third Addition shall be limited to the number, size and height requirement::; qf the City Code. 8 26. Shall provide an internal pedestrian access system to be reviewed at the time of building permit review. 27. Shall provide access points in locations approved by the City Engineer to ensure proper ingress/egress to the site. 28. Staff shall verify that the retail center is in compliance with its requirement prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy within the retail center. 29. Loading facilities shall comply with the requirements of Section 11.63. 30. The ownership, operation and maintenance of the private driveways within the PUD shall be the responsibility of the developer and/or its assigns and shall not be accepted by the City. 31. Irrigation system shall be provided for the landscape islands and perimeter landscaping. 32. Any required or desired noise mitigation, at time of development or some future date, shall be the responsibility ofthe developer and/or their assigns. Alternatives: 1. Recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat to the City Council subject to the conditions presented. 2. Recommend approval of the retail center PUD to the City Council subject to the conditions presented. 3. Recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat to the City Council subject to revised conditions. 4. Recommend approval of the retail center PUD to the City Council subject to revised conditions. 5. Recommend denial of the Preliminary Plat to the City Council. 6. Recommend denial of the retail center PUD to the City Council. 7. Continue the public hearing for additional information. 8. Table the request for additional information. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat and retail center PUD, as recommended or subject to revised conditions. Action Requested: Offer a motion to recommend to the City Council the approval of the Preliminary Plat and retail center PUD, as recommended or subject to revised conditions, and move its adoption. {' -~' -"1Ji~. ,~~ ..' e imt"" g:\boaa-pc\2005\03-03 \deanlakes3 pudprelimplat05029 .doc l..A'lanner II 9 Shakopee - Location Maps Page 1 of 1 oXHIB11A l AG ~ N _ Subject Property . SHAKOPEE w'-rvE ...... Shakopee Boundary COMMUNrrYPRlDESlNCE 18>7 S [=:J zoning Bound.ary [:=J Parcel Boundary Preliminary Platl Final Plat and Planned Unit Development for Dean Lakes Third Addition ... 11_:_ 1~...;" MrT/C'h<:lVAnpP!1n('MinnmRn/man.aso?title=Preliminary+Plat%2C+Final+Pla... 01/26/2005 CXlfIBrrs I HIGHWA Y 101/169 BY-PASS IYAN- BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPS ",.' Sy...PASS ADoJilv" ~ RYAN COMPANIESus, me. 101/169 .t' . 4~, 50 South Teath Sueet, Saite 300 t-fIGI'lWA y sECOI i.I MitmeopoIls, MN 55403-2Ol2 LAKES OUTLOT A OUTLOT 0 612-492-4000 tel 4 612-492-3000 &x 'l-<t',s- WWW.llYANCOMPANII!S.COM - OUTLOT I PlDJBCIlIllIE 1 .' 13 ,c;>-i'~.. OU7l.0T E DEAN LAKES '1< !'fIo,' .' V' 00' , THIRD ADDITION I"\~I()"'O 1 2 ~ V r: " 4-r.ts 5 OJ"'...., ~ VUllo. a OUTLOT J "0 ~ OUTLOT G ' q~, OUTLOT F LOCATION Shakopee Minnesota 'Q' ~ Sl!I!El: TITLI! II: ~.., OVERALL AREA PLAT ).. r 4-r~ . 6~ 1 \S' '~~ ' ,., "J 1 ... ....-:",., ~7.~ . IlImSl0NS """'-'-"""" A' ~~, 6 7 VVII._VI " " . lZ ~ o TLO A nl'T, /IT ,... VV/L.VI V CO. RD. NO. 16 LOWE'S HOMB CENTBRS, me. -~ r----- -.. H1\')'. 268 s.... EastDook -- -.. -- N. wm..boto, NC 28659 -- -.. -- - I I - 336-658-4000 tel 336-658-3287 fax I I WWW.LOWBS.COM AREA SUMMARY . AREA SUMMARY AREA SUMMARY I h=by certify that this plan, speci5catiOll, or "'port was ptcpued by me or und.. my DE:AN LAKES FIRST ADDITlON DEAN LAKES SE:COND ADDITION PROPOSE]) DE:AN LAKfS mlRD ADDI7lON ditect supenision..d that I IltI1 a duly BLOCK 7 = 446,629 S.F. ... 70.2532 Ai:: BLOCK 7 BLOCK 1 €;pL~_. BLOCK 2 = 96.557 SF. = 2.2765 AC. LOT 7 ... 177,638 S.F. . 4.07BD ACRE:S LOT 1 ... 567,317:1: 5oF. ... 13.024:1: ACRES BLOCK 3 = 92.578 5oF. = 2.1253 AC LOT 2... 168,537 S.F. ,. 3.8690 ACRES LOT 2 = 61,281:1: 5oF. ... 7.407:1: ACRES 8LOCK 4 ... 102,435 S.F. = 2.3516 AC. LOT 3 ... . 52,199:1: S.F. ... 1.798:1: ACRES BLOCK 5 = 247,170 5oF. = 5.6742 AC. BLOCK 2 LOT 4 = 52,329;/: 5oF. = 1.201:1: ACRES BLOCK 6 = 112,383 SF. = 2.5800 AC. LOT 1 ,. 107,359 $.F. ... 2.4<146 ACRES LOT 5 = 66,47S:J: S.F. = 1.525:1: ACRfS BLOCK 7 = 92,160 SF. = 2.1157 AC. LOT 2'" 64,396 5oF. = 1.4783 ACRES LOT 6 ... 155,279:1: 5oF. ... 3.565:1: ACRE:S BLOCK B ,. 160,117 5oF. = 3.6758 AC. LOT 3 ... 70,380 5oF. ... 1.6757 ACRE:5 LOT 7 ... 141.470:1: S.F. - 3.247:1: ACRE:S 250 0 250 500 750 LOT 4., 73,119 S.F. ., 1.6786 ACRES r- BEGlSl'RAnONNO. DATE OU71.0T A" 487,079 S.r. ., 11.1818 AC. (BLOCK Z DEAN LAKES SECOND ADDITION) LOT.5.. 60,853 s.F. ... 1.3970 ACRES OUTLOT A ... 80,032;1: S.F: ... 1.837:1: ACRfS Scale ,In feet OU71.0T B" 228,253 5oF: - 5.2400 AC. LOT 6 .. /10,973 S.F. ., 2.5476 ACRE:S REG. 11 120.43 01/20/2005 OU71.0T C .. 1,083,059 S.F. ,. 24.8636 AC. (BLOCK 3 k OUTLOT A DEAN LAKES SF:COND ADDITION) TOTAL AREA .. 7,176,J22:J: S.F:" 27.004:1: ACRE:S OUTLOT D .. 7.834,586 S.F. = 42.7163 AC. BLOCK 3 ClJ2l104 RY~ COMPAN1S3 US,tHCo OUTLOT E = 739,359 5oF. .. 76.9734 Ai:: LOT 7 .. 228,247 s.F. .. 5.2J98 ACRES OUTLOT F.. 688.064:1: 5oF. = 75.7958:1: AC. OUTLOT G .. 1.388.146:1: S.F. = 37.8674:1: AC. OU7l.0T A .. 854.812 SF, = 19.6238 ACRE:S JOBNU1dllIlRHlSTORY OUn.OT H .. 65,179 5oF. = 1.4963 AC. OU71.0T I = 206,374 5oF. ., 4.7377 AC. TOTAL ARE:A .. 1,916,308 SF. = 43.9924 ACRE:S OUTLOT J.. 984.055 SF. - 22.5908 Ai:: OUTLOT K .. 102.774 5oF." 2.3594 AC. OUTLOT L.. 146,39B S.F. = 3.3608 AC. OUTLOT M .. 56,358 S.F." 1.2938 AC. OUTLOT N .. 1,077,368 5oF. .. 24.7330 AC. (P/O PROPOSOD DE:AN LAKES mlRD ADDITION) OUn.OT 0 .. 80.032 s.F." 1.8373 AC. (OU7I.OT A, PROPOSEO DE:AN LAKE:S mlRD ADDITION) OUTLOT p.. 346,169 SF. = 7.9469 AC. (BLOCk 7, DE:AN LAKE:S SECOND AODITION) SEIEET NUMBER OUTLOT Q .. 18,922 S.F... 0.4344 AC. (P/O PROPOSOD OEAN LAKES mlRD ADDITION) SI7&: AREA.. 10,882,198:1: S.F. .. 249.8270;/: AC. 4 'l' Westwood Professional Services. Inc. DRAWN BY CllECBED BY 370'1 'l2thSt.North,Sta,206 SWK SAG $t. Clwd, MN lO303 Pbon<: J2D.2SH495 fa: 320-29.8737 JOB NlllllllER DATE 2IlD15088.03 0l/2Dl200S EXJ-IIBIT C. I (l VICINITY MAP - NOT TO SC~) IYAN- \ / \ 1 / BUILDING lASTING RELATIONSHIPS .', / I / I I / \SECOND I [ / RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. u.1<~ _ \ :! PROJECT LOCA 770N 50 SoIlCh Tenth Sucet, Suite 300 I '" MlaDeopolis,!.IN 55403-2012 OUTLOT P ) 6:\20492-1000 eel 612-492-3000 fax ---_--./ WWW.ll.YANCOHl'ANmS.CO:M: COUNTY ROAD NO. 16 ! DEAN LAKES BL~.! (EAGLE CREE/( BL ~,) ~ " ~'h .s:.t I a I PIOjI!CnlAIIB ~".g!.o>, I DEAN LAKES \ ......... - NSSO;U'03"E \ <" \ 17J THIRD ADDITION \ II .Of.,7tOT J ......... ' ...... 110 " , I ...:.:ZIl....~=~.lJ - \ .... ~ 3 "- I tAAD' FIRST ADt'Jt1lCN'~ "- I ~ DffaOPMENT INFORMA T/ON "- !-,I 5 {[J\ "- I '- ~ ~I! . ~\ CURRENT ZONING: '- 8-1 ~ '- ! Ii: , 8UIUJABLE LOTS = 7 '1 87 256 66 I LOCATION lil 212 197 roTAL SITE: ARCA = 25.167 ACRE:S I I Shakopee L____ ,.. _-_ 188 PROPOSED STREIT RIGHT OF" WAY ARCA '" 0 ACRE:S I ~ Minnesota I I LOT AREA'" 25.167 ACRES I I SHIlIlTTiTLE Q' I MINIMlJM LOT I'A07rl = 237 FEET I ~ I f-<P' PRELIMINARY PLAT I ~ MINIMUM LOT I'AOTH pm ZONING ORDINANCE '" 100 FEET Q: I I ).. i'=l a Oa MINIMUM LOT SlZI: '" 1,20 Ae. ~ ... I ~I - + MINIMUM LOTS SIZE pm ZONING ORDINANCE '" 1.0 AC. m -, IlIlVISlONS g'll O:"lTLOT N I ~: I ~ :c: I .~ ... : O(l72.0T cl ~ 27 I :i I I I ~ ~, III .fty,~ 1 I", _-1 " O"k I c::i I <.<' :c: I LOWE'S HOME CENTERS. INC. I l::I I 6 H...,.. 268 Boot, East Dock ~ I 7 OWNER It DEVaOPER N. W>lksbo"" NC 28659 I I RYAN COMPANIES Us. INC. Q: .50 South 10th Street I ~ I SUite 300 336-658-4000 tel I ~ Minneapolis, loiN 55403 336-658-3257 fax I ~ ! ~jl \ PLANNER-ENGINEER WWW.LOWllS.COM 8 RYAN COMPANIE:S Us. fNe. I I I~~ ~\ \ Ot.lTLOT.G 50 South 10th 5treet SUIte 300 I I ~~ \I \ Minneapolis, loiN 55403 1..-,' r hereby cccti!y that dlls plan, SpeciJiCltion, .-' or ""PO"..... ptepared by me Ot Wlder my ARCHITE:CT I I RYAN COMPANIE:S us. INe. direct SupenisloD and that I am 0 cloly }------- I!D -...--.... I 50 South 10th Street ~~~a{ I Suite 300 \ 165 625 A/fnnoapolls, loiN 55403 ) \ 205 ~.~r~ , 1025 AU. v QU1U1T 0 IS DfWIlAGt f SURVE:YOR: """"CCWSf:RVA7IQH~\ OUTLOT A o:-nOT 0 AND UmJ1'f I:ME1IEJIr PER ( lIf'S7lIOOO PROFESSIONAL SERVlC!:S. INe. __J OEAH tAXES FIRST A/:1QI1f('II 3701 12th Streel North Suit. 206 '-- 1095.60 589029'41"E SL Claud, UN 56303 320-253-9495 IlIlGISTllA.TIONNO. l.. DATE COUNTY ROAD NO. 16 REG.I12D43 0112012005 - LEGAl. DESCRIPl10N - e 200C RVNI COMPANIES us, IHC. - OuIJats N and Q, DEAN LAKES. according 10 the ..... '~Qrded plot thereot; Scott Count,); Minnesota. - --~ ~----------------- - JOSNl11dllER HISTOBY ~ ( ---- -- -- -~~~ --- I I I:ASEMENTS Il'ml: TAKEN FROM AN ALTA/ACSM LAND TlTIE - -- - SURVF:Y AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVF:Y PRFFARED BY weSTWOOO - - I I PROFE:SSlONAL StrRVlCI:S F"OR RYAN COMPANIE:S Us, fNe. OATf1J AREA SUMMARY - - 100 0 100 200 300 3/24/04. NO SEARCH FOR I:ASEMmTS HAS BffN OONE 8Y - - ~ - I I THE SURVE:YOR SINCE THAT OATE:. LOT 1 "" 567,317:J: S.F. "" 13.024:J: ACRES Scale in feel LOT 2 '" 61,281:J: S.F. "" 1.407:J: ACRES SllI!ET NllMIlllll LOT 3 = 52,199:J: S.F. "" 1.198:t ACRES Subjecl prop.rty app.ars 10 b. classified as Zona C (areos LOT 4 = 52,329:t S.F. = 1.201:J: ACRes 3 above Ihe 500 year ffood) whon scaled from Flood Insurance LOT 5 "" 66,415:t S.F. "" 1.525:t ACRes Rote Map Community - Panof Number 270434-0002 C. dated LOT 6 = 155,279:t S.F. "" 3.565:t ACRI:S '" Westwood Professional SelVices, Inc. Seplember 29, 1978. LOT 7 = 141,470:J: S.F. '" 3.247:i: ACRES DRAWN BY ClmlXEDBY OUTLOT A '" 80,032:1: S.F. = 1.837:J: ACRES ",,-""" SWK SAG !dol """'- MN l5a<4 l,176,322:t S.F. '" 27.004:t ACRES Phone: '520937-5150 Fa: 'SZ-937..sm JOB N1lldllEB. DATE TOTAL "" 20016DBU3 01/2012005 EXHIBIT D ~ SHAKOPEE February 22, 2005 Mr. Lee Koppy Ryan Companies US, Inc. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403 RE: Dean Lakes Third Addition Dear Mr. Koppy: City staffis in receipt of your February 1 th letter regarding the inclusion of the proposed Outlot A in Dean Lakes Third Addition. Your letter states that ".. .it seemed clear to everyone at the table that planning the conservation easement lot was integral to successfitlly planning the overall area. In particular, Lowe's and Ryan Companies were asked by City staff to bring forward a landscaping plan for the area as part of the plat submission, and to look at the area as a way to screen the southern elevation of the Low~ 's project." City staff does certainly believe that it is important to address the design of the conservation easement area in order to provide screening, and to address ecological sustainability and compatibility. However, addressing the landscaping needs of the conservation easement area could be met without replatting that outlot, since the configuration and purpose ofthe outlot are not proposed to change. The letter notes that the EAC unanimously recommended approval of the plan. Because the EAC reviews only for environmental aspects of the plat, the recommendation from the EAC and the inclusion of the outlot in the plat application are not directly related. The EAC would have the ability to review development of the outlot regardless of whether or not the outlot was included in the plat for the third addition. The concern raised by staff is that the inclusion of the existing outlot area brings the overall site into compliance with the impervious surface requirement. Without including the outlot area in the plat, the site would exceed the impervious surface requirement. The amount ofimpervious surface provided on the site is an issue that staffhas raised on previous occasions, requesting that Ryan/Lowe's propose alternatives to the excessive amount of impervious area in part because Dean Lakes is a development that is premised on sensitivity to environmental concerns. Sincerely, i1f1 klvivv-- ulie Klima Planner II CC: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director Caselog 05-029 2005 Correspondence File h:\j u 1 ie\pla(ltrs\dean lakes] .doc CO:'-I\llii\'In' PRIDE SI!':CE 1837 1:'" H,,:;"~; ;;lr,;cl S::;,:!h . SI1"k'>r~'~, :.ji:-.ncw:_; . ~5:""- ':'~:' ',5:-::'::-":":" . !:,.".:': 11:'':;.::;3-3.~';: . ,',..'..... c:.;h:li,:,>;'c~ mil '.b 8Xft/B rr6, City of Shakopee Memorandum TO: Julie Klima, Planner II FROM: Joe Swentek, Project Engineer SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat, Final Plat & PUD - Dean Lakes. 3rd Addition PID NO.: 27-371321-0,27-371322-0,27-371324-0 CASE NO.: 05029 DATE: February 25, 200S The application indicates a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat and Planned Unit Development request for a Highway Business (B-1) development to be located in Outlot N, Outlot 0 and Outlot Q of the Dean Lakes 1 st Addition. After reviewing the above referenced application, we have the following comments for the applicant and for the planning department: General 1. Execution of a Developer's Agreement, which shall include provisions for security for public improvements (watermain) within the Final Plat and the engineering review fees. 2. Payment of Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges shall be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 3. Payment of Trunk Storm Water Charges and Trunk Storm Water Storage and Treatment Charges shall be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 4. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City Engineer and the Shakopee Public Utility Commission (SPUC) approve the Final Construction Plans and Specifications. 5. All proposed sanitary sewer and storm sewer shall be private. 6. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approvals/permits for proposed improvements within the City of Shakopee's and Scott County's right-of-way and drainage and utility easements prior to construction. 7. The applicant ~hall revise Lots 1,.7 .1lS necessary to comply with the maximum allowable impervious surface percentage as set forth by the Shakopee City Code. C:\Documents and Settings\JKIillUllLocal SettingslTempormy Internet FilesIOLKAIPP.FP.PUD.Review.Dean.Lakes.3rd.doc Page I of2 EXfflBIT ~:{ Final Plat 1. Provide electronic (Auto CAD) files ofthe Final Plat to the engineering department. 2. The applicant shall remove Outlot A (Outlot 0 of the Dean Lakes 1st Addition) from the Dean Lakes 3rd Addition plat. 3. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. Storm Water Mana2:ement Plan 1. The applicant shall comply with the storm water management plan approved with the Dean Lakes 1st Addition. Transportation 1. The applicant shall submit a traffic analysis of the proposed impact this development will have on adjacent City streets (Dean Lakes Boulevard and Dean Lakes Trail). Recommendation Engineering staff recommends approval subject to the comments listed above being addressed by the applicallt and approved by the City prior to recording of the Final Plat. C:\Documents and SettingslJKlirna\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKAIPP.FP.PUD.Review.Dean.Lakes.3rd.doc Page 2 of2 JI. .\k;~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ \" I CXffl8>IT F;. SITE NOTES F ''-......r-""'- - r - - I~I N ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WIn; n;E CITY OF SHAKOPEE SPECIFICA l10NS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. I . REFER TO GRADING PLA.N FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES. DEAN LAKES B V BUILDING LASTING RaATlONSHIPS REFER TO CIVIL DETAIL FOR CONSlRUC110N DETAILS. I L D I RYAN COMPANIES US, INe. AlL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED I SO SoutbT.,,,b Sueer, Suile300 01HERWlSE. Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 ~ I BUILDING DIMENSIONS REFER TO OUTSIDE OF BUILOING FACE (nF.) AREA IOEN1IF1CAnOH 612-492-4000 lei UNLESS OTHERYtlSE NOTED. SIGN (SEE SHEET 24) 612-49z.JDOO!ax ALL CURB AND GUTTER TO BE CONCRETE B612 UNLESS NOTED WWW.RYANCOMPANIIlS.COM On;ERWlSE. nFlCAL FULL SIZE 90' PARKING STALL IS 9'X2Q' UNLESS NOTED PIOJECfN.!llll 01HERWlSE. DEAN LAKES THIRD ADDITION IS' PAR SElllA LOCATION SITE DATA: DEAN LAKES THIRD ADDITION SHAKOPEE MlNNESOTA ~.~ ~~ ~U~: '~.,~~~g SF -- - - OVERALL SITE PLAN PARKING: 579 STAlLS PROVIDED .PARKING: 5.00 STAlLS PER 1000 SF Dr BLOG <- IMPERVIOUS: B7.9:{ (11.43 AC = 49B,784 SF) l!f~ llEVISIONS LOT 2: ig ..." . LOT: 1.41 AC 15l: (....... ~ BLDG: 6.200 SF .,,::1 _.......;, I,'-" - PARKING: 64 STALLS PROVIDED . "'5 L~-'1 l 'PARKING: 10.3 STALLS PER 1000 SF Or BLOG"~ -T~ ~I~:C .' IMPERVIOUS: 63.B:{ (0.90 AC = 39.204 SF) - ~!D::I~ --1-- -I --I-- LOT 3: =-1== --I-- LOT: 1.20 AC 0 --1-- --,-- ~~~:IN~;~~ ~ALlS PROVIDED <( ==C= ==1== 'PARKING: 10.0 STAlLS PER 1000 SF OF BLOG 0 --i-- IMPERVIOUS: 67.2:{ (0.81 AC = 35,067 SF) --1-- --,-- LOT 4' "" ---- . u.. ,.....J..-1\ LOT: 1.20 AC 'l..~F'" ~~~N~;O~~ ~ALLS PROVlOED >- ==IE:: Ihcrcby=tifyth3tlbispWl,Spcci.6ClllioD, .PARKING: 7.3 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BlDG "" or <eportwas p"'pucd by me or under my IMPERVIOUS: 74.5% (0.89 AC - 36,967 SF) u.. cfuec:tsupervisioa",dtlathmaduly ~ Licen.ed PmCessioaal EDgin..., under the LOT 5: ...J laws 0 \he Stlte of MinnesObL LOT: 1.52 AC If"n BLOG: 7,700 SF L.LI PARKING: 85 STALLS PROVIDED "" 'PARKING: 11.0 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BlDG u.. . pp IMPERVIOUS: 71.1:{ (1.08 AC m 47,062 SF) W REGlSTllATIONNO. DATE LOT 6: L- . 41267 l/1JJ/2fJOS LOT: 3.56 AC r- BLOG: 50,000 SF Z "'....RYANCOMP""esus. INC, PARKING: 150 STALLS PROVlOED .PARKING: 3.0 STALLS PER .1000 SF OF BLOG ...". .....",. """ ,... '" . ,,.,,, ,., ...... ~ - ~ LOT 7: I () . .' ~~~/]5.tog SF I PR POSED CONCRETE ~ <i) PARKING: 136 STALLS PROVIDED ,..,... St RWAY WI HANO RAIL ~ . I .PARKING: 4.6 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLOG ..." '" IMPERVIOUS: 80.6:{ (2.62 AC = 114,163 SF) I tX) PR POSEU CONCRETE z LOWE 5 W !l RETAIL 'GO' ~:r4:6:: AC O' . ~ 30,000 SO FT LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC. BLOG: N/A I. RETAIL I!l H"'1.268 Easr, East Dock PARKING: N/A Z ",' SO,OOO SO FT N. Wllksboro NC 28659 .PARKING: N/A ' IMPERVIOUS: 07. . 3~8-40DO lei I 0 336-658-3257 r"" TOTAL: a:: 116K DEEP WWW.LOWES.COM TOTAL AREA PLATTED: 27.00 AC. I. F.F.e.-moo ~ ~g+~t ~~~IN~~9;i,~~ ~ALLS PROVlOED 0 33 0 . ... ..;:';;:;::..,::;;:<<. "'., _ 'TOTAL PARKING: 5:0 STAt.l.S PER 1000 SF OF SLOG :ti/<::~~(..:\t. Wii1:L. .... ......11I"".... TOTAL IMPERVIOUS. 20.24 AC - 74.97. I () ..... ........ ..... ........ ......................... 75:{ ALLOWABLE = 20.25 AC Civil Engl'ileering Inc. 'BASED ON 1 STALL PER 200 SF OF BlDG . . . . (OR 5 STALLS PER 1000 Sf" Of" BLOC) I \ RECEMNG ~I.;,~::"N; 7i71~' 51,. C I R60.00 \ '(479) 464.8850 (V) 1(479) 464.9040 (F) A-W~NO 1 Reolonal Offlett" 15022 West 106th Sl J Len.... KS 66215 I I (913) 310.0470 (V) I (913) 310.026\ (F) I -- ~ ------------ I SHEETNtJMBI!ll. I - - S' P~'N~ - ----=--- ........, OUTLOT A - C 60 8 SElllACK 1.84Ac. _ SllIVEYEllBY PRDJEClWNAGE! I SCAl:. IN WESTWOOD LEE R. KDPPY JOB NUllml!ll. DATE 0902-340 01120/2006 I ~ -..-';" . f}4" r I r · .~ ~"'_<li&a_:f4f;.{!f.ff''''"''" 1Jl.,I3.'~"'" =....1.\. '%. ~?-o,)~ ". ~'~'~It:~~::; ~\. .' ...,- ""'7 , * · t.iVISIOf\lS · SITE NOTES ili;#.;"~ll',;,~-~"'~-''''''~-,~..;~~-. ..=_:~~~~.~ -- ~ ,~~S....",~.fl _~.. "EGENERALNOTES:... 'O='&.'g 6~~~ _ - .....__~:.c-__ - _ ".%~~.s.....~",:.=-::~.:=~~~~~!7;.. ~;:~ ..... \.::;:: .~~1O \. COOIUJIN,\lIustSCFAh fMUl'WlAAlRXINFOlUAATlONANDCHlCClNCllUlllOEOHl.YrTlS " ~ @__..____.._ . . ~. ~ "~\"~!l' ~ _ \ ....._........'lIlTn>c.u<1lIAn_"......COCOllON<....""""... \\.011, ~.... 'l" DATE CESCRlP'I1ON lII't<<""'''''~''e '. - ~~~.",~"'~ ~.... -, ~....1ti ~ \, ....,I;1t.'.... n>ll.Il...".....""""""'''................CCNnAC1OlI................<=M<<..'''' , D,? -' -= ~ ~~"a!~"'SC.ffs,,",~ - _ ~~~~~.,,~ - _ ....-q.~ 6 'I ~.... .. _ COOIlDIN41VsttaM\lOHnlEPWUIUOU:CCNS1'RUc:rOUTAIt1S. '" . t;'\TAPEROJUTOMATCHEXImNG ~....~~~ .~~ 'Ii .,~... ::;:;;:;l~' "-';:dt:' ..~ ~~ . .-. ~"~.~ 1!lCCB'T1MiDlI1NOIl:II1IP0'I'HIRWULl'.WlNG5KW.nstANtlAlDIMYItftJMN)Uf....~." :~.... ~ d~ 'W:~" '=' 5t-~~~.....-.......;;w.::;! .=,..' ~ c,.&.. ~_ ~--'" '.' _-:;s.> . C9.: w .... . -s.~~~-*_e::~:".;.= ".", .'. .' .. .... .. "iP' ~ \' ~~ "."k~. ~ UNlSIcntUWlStHO'RO.AU.CUUIMDttATID.PWl1l2....CCNO:mCWANllca,ma. '" fl:i (:OJ . ~~ . - - . '~ . ..:~;.:.....-;. WItM'WGSHAU..IUOf1'AlLCZJ.,\o\lirIWOlD2WtMtDd~ ~ t;'\4WlOEPAlNTEDST1UPES.>lO.C.G4S' "~~ ~ ~ .- ~_\ \. . 1~1.'m. ..............................,......."""""'" ;J'., '=I J" ,,~- ~ .n' '. ~.=. . "'........ - "" ."... ~~.,. ~',,:~ 'I.i"'~ LF "".Il ~:;;.~~ . AU.~IHDICATm4lKAHOICAMD'l'ACUSHAU.UQMHANDICN'M\1MfHf1o'.WQhlCS t:I ~ - . . e . E.......WINCi~PlANFOR.LENGTHANDCO._. ~ ~~, ~~~ ,\' .~' ~ . ~:,.,,--;=-"'" ANDSlGNSAJINDlGloTmONMO!TAM.JHRBHll.Df1'A1LDJIS. st.uu.....am'V/IH'TONCB\Ie:A ""~1S"1 '" a 4 WIDE IAN ~I" 1...... .-..,. ~~:e:._ R :co A \ , 1 41 :s:e.&~~~ L_. """"N:CISIIN'x.NlNADOmCNl'O'ntiMCM. .(# "'" -~~ "'~, .' .~~~:;~~ CART~5HAU.nftlRJlSMEDANDINSTAU.EP""u;:I\IofS,.'~ ~" O 4.WIOEDOUBL!tANESTR1PING.PER.M.U.T.c.o. 1 20 Ac ~~~ ~ '. . '. - ~, __ .............,.,...........n>""AIlCHlJ1CTUIAl.......""'''''''''l/XA1lO>U'''''.......... I TAT tOO 60' 90' 120' (SEEJIt.AN FOR.UNGni AND COLOR) .. ""t - "'" 'I I -_,1:.~~ :.... ____... OI'lHl!\ISt'IME,CioW)f)olamP.AOP'm'AY\HQmt'.JO<<CHES.llAMI'S.lIUCClIOOL.P\lEOll! --- . .. -~ - \.........: 11: - ~~. ...-.............."""".........unurt........."'.... . . ..~ 4.WIDESklPLANESTRlPlNC&~WtDElANEsrRIPlNG CASUAL ,,~ ~ ~-~~ .... 'AJNTB)~MID01IANCI.w.JIGIG."'WUM1'M.AMlHGSrre.SHALl.n.llMDACCOaDWGTO SCALEINF!ET . ..,.,...." .~ - ~"9' ':eo O~ ~' ,. ~ ........"""""""....._n...CCMm"""........._'"""_.. SITE PROPOSED FEATURES e IT": stAUS ~ 0 A 'Yt" 1:J lSS :!J "='_"o:...4t~ PllOcrANO,AYAlLal!QUIll!OR!lAfGccm. 112 ENDOFCIJIlI tt~~";/~ ~ -'" l' ~ " /' i' ~ . ~ ~"'4'~ I ---- IOUNIlAAYUNE CI .:::::: ~~ ~ v.". ~ . -=k-~~it , . fOI.SlrtununB.SEIunurrPIAN. _____ R1C;HTOFWAYUNE ~ II ~-~ II c:::J 16.LPi1~111 ~ \'~~ "~\~./ ' . .';',,,,~DlIII\ 13 It, .,_ \\\~~\ ;;;.;.:=-~~_.ACf~M.""~_oa =-0-= ~i:~i.ANOwrm . ~ m-764.00 r~1 \.Ii _~ ~ l ,........... . ..:10~ . -- _~ AU.1IOIlIC.TORDCNl1NftIlC.TACCClRJMNl:fwrfttDMSlON2OFIDM'f JrROAlDstn RETA1NINGWAU Qi" c~~ "~ . ~ .... 35 -==="'" ~~ ~_.!":r.:_ SJIIQfItAT1CNL ... ... FIR!LANESTlUPING . . r2iz2 , . <>. ~ 0l07-R...'i" ....... I' '~ ~"'W~~ , ~ 1111 l;/"\ .1' ~ (j;z) III, ~., ~ ~ -~ ,,~ ~ \ ft. '\ .~ lllCATlONOI'BUlI.DlNGCONTROLPOINf L W IIIIII11 .eI ) l CI. III yw.ow . ~ ~ ~. \.-s . 2S PROPOSEDPAIlKINC;SPACiCOUNTER ,.!-I . _ r"/w"~ ~f"~ SITEO"'"AILS 1I1lllllllB OROPINLEfSlSElGRAOINGPlANfOIlTmj !!! ........., 16 '-= .., _~ :~W:~ 1_: ..t. SANrrARYSEWERMANH01.E .11111111"111^'--- ;~~--."" ..::::; ~*= t'~J \0 \. 'w. \ 1r.2!!!..==:.::~~=,:;::.-"'--, ~ F1IlEKYO\IANT"""'c;tIAAOPOSTS LI ..bif 11 j 'T-' ~ . - JJIO;F .~, .~3~1 \ r=71' 11 UT1UTYPOI.E _____. III ~~ .": ~~'- . \ .,. :![[]!:J~- -= \\ E~1 (][J TYPICAl.1lAAAICADE ~ c;tIAAOIWI.DETAIL E CA.TCOIlAAl.............""'....."...... JlIIIII1111 "II T 111111 r" 021 ; ~ + I U IlJ;.~ 121 "2b~111 r I \'0- ~~.~ II- == Ell;: :E: :E :E: ~. == \\ ~. . []!J CHAIN LINK FENa Immj!j!j!iii!1!i!iii!!!iHiii;ijfi!HiiiI HEAVYD\J1YASPHALWVEMENT ~ GiY' :'~ ~~ ~I ll, ___ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ f-II= = _ _ _ ~ ~."""::~ \ [E TlWFICFLOWAlUlOW IE PAIIEMENT....ICINC;STOPIAA I'. ~ . . .... ' .1 HEAVYDUTYCONC....EPAVEMENr c: ::::;) (11I1;; I. Jf,lI' 10.7]' ~ ".-- II. or 2T - r.. ~"""^. - - - \ 'l.' 'Ofi'~~ . __ -- &<-~ "". ~~ -=-~ =IE --l'":'S<-- -- - ~,-:.~ I Dl2,4 I FIIU! lANE Sl1UP"'" __. _~ _ _ __ """'-pim.~ ..~.:..!!...l!... r:J2:b!: :J!:I ..E....aL --.. _~. ==If.-- =:::.': = ~:"'. ~. - - -I-- - - - - - ~ = ~l1"'" - 64' -I-- 64' - - 64' - - 65.5' _ 2:::6?.5' - ~ 64' - -ji!t~ 65.5' - - 64' - ~"""'I"" '", []ii!] DOUBUllDED'NOPAIlI<IN......ELAN..SKlN SITE DATA __ _I-- - - -- -i-- -... ""...r<-- _.~. - - -f- - - -- -I-- .~~- -=-""'-. -~ =::j_g - - E =:i -~ - . ...-. - - - ~;lf: ~ \ . 1000000Il.O\WSROADO""OETAIL . Aaea~e: . I- - - ~I-- - - - -- =1= ~ ~;;'i - 'TYP. - - --tg. -~ - . DlO4 - \ "'.~ ~ . Lowe',Tracl 13.024 I- =-l:OT!!::1= = = -:i;:~7 -i--;';{ 20' _f-_24'~-J -- !-'TYP. -~ - - ........-'- \';;,,~n~ ~. [][]"""TRETUIlNIlACK~"''''''odbyl.owa) D<veloperTract 12.143 1= _ ::&66 ~f- _ - :::a:.~c. _ ~," 1YP. , ./ -H - ~ ~ ~~.,.,~ T..tal 25.167 I- - - -~ - - --_ -_r- ~~-:.- -_I -~~ DlOl_C ~ - _ - =1.: ....._I'IJ?!J '~I-- ljjiaj'T STANDARDDUTYASPHALTPAVEM!NTlECTIOI<1 Main Bul1dlnRl 117347SF . . I- _ _ -f- - - - _' .~_ _~ _~ 24' g "",.- ,." L::.I Sale. Floor . .. k C ...... ,...."'""'~-~ v -~ 1YP. - - - 1YP. - ~ ''':,\ r;;;.:;"1 .0000ceArea 3.B94S.F. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS lNC I-' - -,...-. ~ <>" 1YP. 1- __ '\. -I-- _ - - - ~-1';;:: "i8~~ a.!!iI HEAvynUTYASPHAl.TPAVEMENrSlCT1ONS RedevlnglSlOrage 13.663S.F. __ ___- _ _ __ _i--~1i:~_ _I-- _E -= i=- ->-- - 2ii' · ,";~<;~","\ii' Udlltylloom, 1.370S.F. HWY.268EAST,EASTDOCK t::. - - - - - - -~IT- =:l-:.==IEI -- - r- =E _~= E -~. :fff'~\ \f*i!t~~'. ... I][J HEAVYOUTYCONCllEfEPAVEMENTlECTION ~ ~'W1LKESBORO'NC22l65ll I- .~ - - - -- - - - -i--"",iii!- -li!l}"~lIL-f-1 m.wr.. __ _ -' DlII ...... .~~..~, ~ Main Entrance 1.049S.F. . I- - - - -_ _- -_ -_ -_ =i=BHI- _lPACE5_ __ ,... =t::: - - _ . - i~~4-~, '. __ I]l!] 24"CONCRErECUR8&W1TEllOETAIL MalilExlt 33lS.F: .658AOOOM336.6S&.3257(F) I- . - - - ,a~- - ~ .,lU' I, ,g, _~ _ . _ _ _ !!;!JI!j'g~'f1if~ ..---. Lumber 48DS.F, . . I- .. ii;. = = = = ~ or- 9E'w-:~ ::-1 -1--: -- - ill:..~ .~~ -~ - -l, - - ~ IIJl . \~~~'J~~~,., ...:::;;;'%\&1 (]l!] CONCIlETECUaB&oumIlOOW!l.EDJOI>lTOETAIL MarnBundingTQ!a1 138.134 S.F. [.;;::'~===-I ~ '? ~ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~-! la _~~ _ -(I>> ~ - L.- . - r - - - %~~4'S~':K~~~~{ml~ Garden Center: ==~=~.=. . "..." _ _ _ _~ -.,1;- -----Il --i, . I . . Dl~ - -. - -c. ~. '::":Vw..;:'it1~~1?~~'~":~ IIllC9 I CONCIlETEPAVEMENTJOINTDETAIlS ShadeStruclUre 5.930S.F. =...-............ . ~ "" -=- -=- '" _ _ - - I"~ ~ I DlOl j.w:.,. - - I - .1t2.r ..,.... .,'$1!!iif"-""''''~'<.<\j . >,. Covered Area 6.798 S.F. . . ~ ~ ,a.. 0' .....9. "7 ~ ---...J .:'E#.:$t"-4'......:::~~1:-~~.if.oh~ ",.,:,." ~~"-.~i,., 18931 SF ~ 1YP. ."""~"'~~~~~""1li,"... []EJ JOlNTnETAlU [E[) CONCllETE\l.IiEELSTOPDETAR Open Area 31 i\S9 S'F' . .- 1/ M, --=- ' ~ illi-:'"' : J, "r.. r~. ':'.~.~~_'~'/;>::' .':.~/:: ;;.~::.:., ~r'.,;> ..:. 0214' .l.'~;" [!E) STOPOCNDETAIL mo HANOKAPPAllKINc;~ON S!a:g;~~;;~; 19;::~i:~; @ ,0" "" :. VI ,I. 1" ~ T 1, .. . .;;~ lIC~ r!!-<!iJ-"',j_ Parkln~ReQulremenU: '" ....)~1.~ j1o:r l / ~ AI "'-"I . ~ I P= '" !1l \.'~ '<N'~ hf-::','" ". J '7~1~~~ ( . Lowe', Parking Reqlred 610 _ ~ t;,- ~ ~ .11-'I m 'tELLOW I ~:. ..... ;"[~~.M Standard f- Ii $f" PAlNTElHOUO..J PAlNTED:r-1 PAINTEOyw.owJ ~SNJAU<. I .. ~::: \ ~:WE~~f~~ Handicapped 12 ___ r- t .;,. YE""';'.u,~ WHITESIU~-' 1.....O.01NC;ZON". PAlNTEDSOUO ~AINTEtl S1RtJCTU8E!L_-' ~ > @~\1,~~';i!l;liW~' T..tal ParldngReQlred 622 III :--- t" . '" PAlNTEDSO~J - G 10Q'O.C. YEU.OWUNE CROSSWA1X r- - ~HP....~. ~~(st~~ Rado-4"{splcesllOOOd) ,--(;. ~ . T!1J.OWUNE 24" HIC;H..... @"O.C.84S' I ~ '. '. ,. ~ !.ffi.'~\i~,," Local Parking Required a = ~ .. w. , 4.Ul' IIS'TO FENCE ~. . .;. I :: '1 -V.tt~~ Standard" ~ I ~t . I 2.S ~.s:.: ~ ...!!!... + ~~~~tJ.~ Handicapped: -~~, I r:", .... {C~ ~~<<-~. \ TotalParldngReqlred RETAIL --- .",."" - .J r'. .'ll' . .... '-"i'b:J,,,,,,,,..,.' "".-XJ< ''''.....00001) ""ODD "'" -li!~, . ~ lJ11 . - - . .:'. ~..Y. {~f,,~~J.%t \ Parking Provided 568 CI ". sr..... - llit"'",.. \".,/ I DlIO I=' I:.i..':' . ,,'.. ".Z~ Standard """000 ST) _ ~, !;l!' . ..!: S4LSAR.S4 ........ I"" . 1! . · .:. ~~~ Handicapped 12 !:~T~I~ f~~' L. ~ ~"". ':'" ~ TotarParklngProlllded 580 -.I d~,,~,}, ~It. D WE. S. ~ -, . ~:~: -f.. .'X'~ "'~;;~~' ""0-4.2'",-,,00001) r- f""~'. I Ill! YElLOW -' . . V\.. ~'i<;r;",.~->}, - ~.~ .. . I ~ ; : . .r...... ~ \&: ~~~. , ~ t=il, 116K DEEP L_-1 ~::.~<. <~~~c;~ \~. ~.. '\ ENLARGED CUSTOMER LOADING CANOPY · z · .1itJ ~~';C" F.F.E.-m.OO CO~ARSII h'~""::rJ" ..~' ~ wI~1;, SCALE-1"=20' '7 ~ 0 Ii ;~.~ ': J T-7-"" ... .... '.~1' 268LF fi~~~' I .,'. ':-:':':::. :.:-:.:<-:.:- ttl :.c: (""t..: PAO MOUNTf!l TAANIPOIlMEIl 1- .....".' y 1Dl)\, "'-ftE!;.,,,.,, I:). ....... .... ..:>1 - 0. \ ~ ~ "'= 'I<E AACH. '''''''''\ AlLOOWNJPOUTllHAU.l fill!} ~. . '; . ..... \ '..;'. - ~ }\';:'.~':~~ '\ 1(. .:::::: :':::::,1 ~ ., ~:,~>- GEN~TOA :~~E7:~5 1'-"., : .'oJ .~. '. '4 ~j~~1i ::. .::.'.:.~:.: ..:-:.:-:::. < e ~;;':" lEEAACH.PIANlI\ ATCONNecnONtO I '.1>.. t-;.. t~ <",,~"~,v., V 1 ~ ~ I I."..... ... .., - :I: ~ I II .~. :.,.~ ~ 'IHUIJILDINGUNUSS \II . .... ....-;-J_.:~.. ! ..~. ~~ ~r~~? ~. .::.:.:.:.:-:. .:-:-::-:. :: i . ~l' .J....l. on'EIl''''''''EOPIEll... '. __. ..... ., '.,. . ., '. , <.~~.#r,.,. I:.~ ......... ..... ",., '" v ~ . L2SJ LlSI STORAGE RECEMNG i: .':/ '.'. '.. .... ',~ XE '." .r.f. a ~~*=i~ v.: . :.::. ..:::. ';;? t- = I... :.. STAGING J TIlASHCOMPA 0. TRlICKWELI. '.~ .; p.'.:'. '~'~:.'.; :.:. ~ : .J~. ~ ~~;~l%' PAINTEOWHfTE I I v. -:::.~Ati rEO'YE~ ~ ~d -t I' [ ~"'IU:H.'jAN>; I.:..... .'. '.'" I P; '. =[]jE]. ~ ~:"'-fi'k!. 'STOP'ANOSTOP jiPAINTEOYELlOlXl rPAINTEDYEUOW .. ~...tO IhlG~...J ,. ,,!JJ';~~~ r:' <. . M')( ". .. DIm."'" . . ::J ~~/.'~.!r':~~~~.i'::':::;':':"fo:<:>: .~ 111: fi72~~~~:.::: ::'110'SKI~P / ARROW~sOlIO :-::':':-:-:"::'::-::::/\:~~\:':::I &: ~. ~ i I I '. ., . .' I.,.... ".. . ., .. . '" . ~ . '. P...'/ ~ \. 'icS' ~~ .., .. ~..,.:2l r,.....y~....,..;;;:....~ -+- ........ .......... ...... ~ 1......- W i< .'. r." . .... 'P..II. ". ..........__. 'P'" . .' . . .... .... '..:'::;".&~","-:"; ............ .. . .... ... ... .... r- It I ~ . .,..... ~ . ". . '. .... . :~.. ...... ~.. . .., '" " . .~... .t~.;;r..... ..I t,;;"'~...y.".., I ~.. ......... .... 0'10 CONCRETE PAVEMENT ... ...C> ..... .... .....1 - Q " EOO5 TYP .' . i:: ....:".. ."... .:- ~. :..>.~. i.. .'.~:. ~ ~:'.~ .~. .::,::'~'.;:'.~'\, -: .ti .... ':;: ~;~,,: ;..~. ~~; .~~:~.:'~,:." ::'. .:.',.. i.: '.:;:. . ..,""::' ~t .1" f il!~t:t: . .:' :.... . .,::-. /::::.:.-::-:::::-::::.:.::. _ ~"'UW~l~ -Ft'.': ':":~.~':' ....:..: : :'-::'.:: V'& ill ~ 0309 I ... i .~,..... '" ...". .. .1'. . ".. ......-. l' '.tJ1 · .,.,~.''''''''."' ... ';?A ........ ..... <0 I .. 0 "" 10 '. ..... ,..... ...... ....!"... .... .... ..... P..... ..... ". ..' fP""" p. 0J05 . ~~~~~~~ ::.: ~ >.?::..:.: ':.iK.H. NItD~~ .: ::.0.:::.:..:.. ::':.. u.. 0.. > ~ >_.._n .............. ~ ~ ~ _. 1 wo< ~ ~ 'i;o'~ ,..~ W -,. : .....:....:.:.... .. ~..:.:...:......::.:~r'~ 1:::...:::~;;;;;.;;.;;u;.'1 0 0 ~ , fW,.t\(7\.rR . / r~VISIONS . .............. - ............. - <> =:g:ET 6 =~~ ............. DAlf: DESCRIPTION " ............... ............. .............. ............. .............. .............. .............. ............. .............. ............. .............. E::: .............. .............. ............. "E: E: E: .............. . ............. E: E: .............. ............. \ " I E: .............. ............. .............. .............. .............. ............. .............. . .............. .........-..... ............. .............. ............. ............... ............. .............. ............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. ............. .............. ............. .............. ............. ..~ . . .. .. . . . . . ............. . .............. @ ............. .............. ............. .............. ............. .............. ............. ............... ............. .............. ............. .............. ............. ............. ................................................................................................ ... ':.:.:- e - - :: lOWE'S HOME CENTERS INC ... HWY.268 EAST, EAST DOCK W N. W1LKESBORO, NC 28659 P' 336.658ADOO M 336.658;3257 (F) e. . 0\ l-_m_"""~M-- I . ................-......- ~ "YIMlIUIOII.PMflSl'ftOM&naDwnHOUTTHI Pl'llBSmWlUTftHCONIINtOl'LOI'.ntlClMi .... ... ....,. =::'WC,comaaKT2CD1INJ.ItIONTS -~,.- STORACE 9UILDINC DISPLAY I . . J'-ONUIlID -, I @ '" r---~ - SEASONAL 1&1 I DISPLAY AREA a 451.33' 11 ' TO FENCE CI I 2.5 ...I I __-1 . z ~ 0 w ~ w ~ ... ~ t 0:: < 0 <( :x: \:! '" v ~ -' l! c:: v l- e.. ~ ~ {\J V\ :s Ii 0\ O. ~ ~ q -l 0:: 0 Q 0 0 W'-lS I ..WQ~ 0 u.o..~~ I- o 0 ~ ~ ::> I 0 Y'~~ w :s.. .~ ~-<z! 1:=__, i> v o I ~!;! 1:9 ....J\rto~ e e ORlGINA!. ~ ISSUE DA.TE: OI.19~S I PERMIT lET 1S5UEOA.TE: i ;I> : CONrrP,UCTlON m I UNE DATE: i DRAWING NUMB.II: 10 I I v e . 1\4.I\4,"J"O C:X.fllBrr G- , CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum To: Julie Klima, Project Manager From: Andrea Weber, Parks and Recreation Landscape Design ,f;!E (:~ r;~ ~~ '~r ::"; i" Subj ect: Dean Lakes Third Addition including Lowe's Site Plan "', ".... ,) l~:::.:, ; 1".' ",.. . , ~ ~.", r.! ,,1 ~; ...:~~~{(3 Date: February 2, 2005 INTRODUCTION The following is a list of review comments and recommendations for the Dean Lakes Third Addition, which includes the Lowe's Site design. Comments regarding site design, planting plans and specifications are included. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS The following comments are listed referencing sheet pages of the current drawing set submitted dated January 20, 200S. 1.) Sheet 8-9: Overall Site Plan and Lowe's Site Plan. . The final Lowe's site plan has added a center row of islands across the site; which were not shown on previous plans review by staff on 10-06-04 and 01-04-05. The addition of these islands with trees to provide shade is beneficial to the site plan. . A continuous island has been' added along the internal drive to separate the parking bays from this drive lane. This both makes the circulation safer, and provides a long island space which has the capacity to hold significant tree plantings with a larger continuous root zone area, which benefits tree growth. . There was no design response to staff s request at the 0l-04-0S meeting with the Developer to try to implement "green" parking lot strategies. The long continuous islands along the internal drive could potentially be used for storm water detention and/or sediment filtration if they were designed as "rain gardens" with appropriate planting, soils, grading, controlled water entrances and outlet structures. Staff encouraged this type of design strategy due to the fact that the Dean Lakes Development was designed as a "Conservation Development." Staff feels that this implies that more than the typical "sea of parking" should be designed in this development in order for it to fulfill its promise to the city. This has not been shown onthe plans submitted. Information was provided by staff directing the Developer to the MN Arboretum Web site parking test site . Another method of "green" parking construction suggested by staff was the use of areas of permeable pavement. None of this material is shown on the plan either. . An additional long parking island was shown on previous plans at the property line shared between Lowe's site and Lot 7 has been removed. This island was "bxmPIr ~ beneficial in breaking up the expanse of parking and controlling traffic. It also could have been designed with a sidewalk to lots 2-4. There is no pedestrian access across the site in the N-S direction through the large parking lot. This' island also could have been designed with a rain garden as described above. . There is no pedestrian access to the site at either the north or south entry from Dean Lake Trail. Current development plans show a trail at Coneflower Lane across from the Lowe's south entrance, but there is no walk provided to connect this trail to the storefront. In addition, this entry drive is a 6% slope which exceeds ADA guidelines for an accessible route so that if a trail were provided to the Coneflower trail, it would not be considered accessible. Part of the Dean Lake Development Parks and Open Space Plan indicates that sidewalks and pedestrian connections are desirable from an ecological standpoint, among others. Pedestrian access between the multiple lots in tIns development is poor overall. There are connections to the restaurants on lots 2-4 from the sidewalk along Dean Lakes Blvd., but that is it. . The overall parking space count, at 4.2/1000SF is lower than the Lowe's standard 4.5/1000 SF which lowers negative environmental impacts, as any reduction in the amount of impervious surface will. 2.) Sheet 20. Overall Landscape Plan. Note: I did not verify the quantities of Landscape Units as per ordinance. Plant List Recommended Changes: . Replace Green Mountain Sugar Maple, Acer saccahrum 'Green Mountain' with a red or cultivar of silver and red maple native species. City maintenance has had poor results with Sugar Maple species on boulevards, so they should be avoided in this type of location. . Replace Flame Amur Maple, AceI' ginnala 'Flame' with a native ornamental shrub. Amur Maples have been shown to "escape" into natural areas, therefore in this development with nearby conservation areas, this tree species is not desirable. . Move Swamp White Oaks, Quercus bicolor near the intersection of Dean Lakes Blvd. and Dean Lakes Trail so that they will not drop acorns onto public walks or roadways OR substitute another non-fruit bearing or very small fruit bearing species in this location. 3.) Sheet 21, Planting Plan for Outlot A (Conservation Area). . I would like to see a direct and complete reference to the Ecological Restoration Management Plan (ERMP) on any sheet which mal<es reference to anything in it. . I would also like to see a reference to the complete Specifications section from the ERMP. The reference should be similar to the following: see Ecological Restoration and Management Plan, Dean Lakes, Shakopee, MN, January 2004, by Applied Ecological Services. Listing who to contact at Ryan Co. Inc should also be noted in this reference. . The plant list and notes should refer to the ERMP for a list of Cover Crops for seeded areas as well as mulching for seeded areas. Planting dates and types of e'XfI./BIT b-3 planting methods should be briefly listed in the notes and a reference to the ERMP should be given. . The ERMP also states on p.12 that "High visibility areas should be enhanced with dry prairie and savanna plugs." The Specifications Section in the ERMP supplies species lists and quantities and this should be added to the planting plan. . The plant list "Remarks" column should have all notations of "(distance) o.c.~~ and "space evenly" removed, as this planting area should look "natural" and should NOT be evenly spaced, it should be irregularly spaced. . Plant materials are generously sized according to the requirements of the ERMP, which requires "all woody materials to be 1 "~2" caliper" on p. 36. Trees are listed as 2.5" and the omamental tree, Choke ChelTY (incorrectly labeled Quercus Macrocarpa in the botanic name column), Prunus virginiana is listed as 2.S". I question whether this species would be available in this size. 4.) Sheet 22, Lowe's Landscape Plan. . Two GA are mislabeled as sa in the NE parking island. . There is a seriously limited shrub palette and non-native shrubs are the extent of the 2 species listed. I would recommend a higher diversity of shrub species which would include some native shrubs which are hardy to parking lot conditions. Red twig dogwood, viburnum and Gro-Low sumac are a few choices that could be successful. S.) Sheet 27, Details. . See the comment on referencing the ERMP as on sheet 21, above. . I prefer wood mulch planting beds to omit landscape fabric. This is a more ecological planting method, as the wood mulch will be able to break down and eventually enrich the soil. Also, if weed barrier is ever removed from existing plantings is does significant damage to the fine surface root system as these roots grow up to and into the fabric seeking moisture. Finally, weeds will grow on top of the weed fabric, so the addition of this material does not actually reduce maintenance. I I I I DEAN LAKES I Third Addition I Shakopee, Minnesota I PROJECT NARRATIVE I SUBMITTED BY: I IVAN RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. 700 International Centre 900 Second Avenue South I Minneapolis, MN 55402-3387 612-336-1200 lei 612-337-5552 fax BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPS WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM I I I I ImpfO\f;ingHi,ome I mprQyement' I Gi I ~a~ : ~c..;)i '1:,,(~C~', - - -- I -j .,.' ': II ....., I.. , "-" '.-, - - -')1",- ?"'. '-j Civil Engineering Inc. ~. . . '. 1.- ..~ ., ,,',. . ". ~,' If:",il"'. I January 20, 2004 I I --- --.- -~- I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS I I. Introduction I A. General. Project Description 1 B. Background 1 I C. Project Team 2 I II. Application Requests A. Preliminary Plat 4 I B. Final Plat _4 C. Retail Planned Unit Development 4 D. Conditional Use Permits 5 I E. Variations 5 F. Permit Applications 7 G. Common Interest Community Documentation 7 '1 III. Consistency with Previous Approvals I A. Overall Dean Lakes P.U.D. 8 B. Overall Dean Lakes Final Plat Resolution 8 I C. Alternative Urban Areawide Review 9 D. Dean's Lake Area Master Plan 10 E. Ecological Restoration ManagementPlan 11 I I IV. Signage 11 V. Schedule 13 I VI. Conclusion 13 I APPEDIX Traffic Memo ,I Lighting Details Sample Pict~res of Lowe's I I I I I. INTRODUCTION I General Project -Description . Ryan Companies is pleased to present the attached application$ for Dean Lakes I Third Addition. These applications include a concurrent review of the Preliminary and Final Plat applications, as well as a Retail Planned Unit Development (PUD) application. This is the third phase of development of th~ Dean Lakes proje~t, I and the second phase of commercial development. This application. proposes platting of the southerly 27.0 acres of the Highway I Business (B1) zoned property currently platted as Outlots N; 0, and Q, Dean Lakes First Addition. The proposed plat subdivides'25.2 acres (Outlots N andQ) into sevel1lots for retail development, and implements landscaping of1.8 acres I of conservation easement (Outlot 0) along the south portion of the platted area. The overall Deah Lakes project area is 282.8 acres of mixed-use development I that includes the following proposed land uses: . Business Park (BP) 89.6 Acres I . Highway BusineSs (B 1) 44.2 Acres . Medium Density Residential 32.5 Acres . Open Space. 83.5 Acres I . Street Right-of-Way 33.0 Acres I The proposed land uses are generallyretail in nature and are consistent with allowable land uses within the Highway Business (81) district. Some proposed uses require Conditional Use.Permits. This applicatioh includes requests for I approval of these conditional uses. The proposed project is fully consistent with the Dean Lakes Alternative Urban I Areawide Review (AUAR), Overall PUD, and conditions set forth in the Resolution approving the Dean Lakes First Addition plat. I Background In Augustof 2003, the City adopted the FinaLAUAR and mitigation for the Dean Lakes project (officially referred to at the time as the Valley Green Corporate I Center/Dean Lakes Residential Development). ' On December 9, 2003, the City of Shako pee approved the overall Planned Unit I Development, followed closely by the City's approval of the Final Plat for Dean Lakes First Addition on January 20, 2004. I The First Addition plat subdivided the 282.8 acres of land south of Highway 169 between Canterbury Road and Dean's Lake into residential lots, right-of-way, large tracts of open space protected by conservation easements, and large I outlots that would eventuglly be subdivided for commercial development. > I R:\_ CIVI L \PROJECTS\Dean Lakes\1 ndividual Lots\3rdAddn\_ Engineering Data\Dean-Lakes-Narrative.doc 1 I I In the. sprihg of 2004, construction began on the publicimprovement~ and mass I grading of the future development areas. The. construction was substantially complete by fall of 2004. .. I In the spring of 2004, the Dean Lakes Second Addition platwas submitted by Ryan Companies to plat 43~0 Ac. ofthe large commercial outlots. This platted eight 81 lots and one BP lot and left a remnant BP parcel as outlot reserved for I future commercial developmeht. In total, the B110t8 measured 18.1 Ac., including 7..9.Ac. platted into two lots on I the west side of County Road 83, and 11.2 a.cres ,east of c;ounty.Road 83. Th~ 11.2 Ac. parcel was platted into six lots and was approved as a Retail PUD. The 24.9 acres of B 1 property was platted into one 5:2 acre lot, with the remaining I 19.7 acres re-platted as outlot. . The Second Addition final platwas recorded in the fall of 2004. Construction is in I process.on the medical office building on Lot 1, Block 2, and will begin soon on Lots 2,3, and 5 of BlocK2. Goodyearand Holiday purchased lots west of County Road 83, and both plan to begin construction spring of 2005. I Project Tearn I Owner/ Applicant/Developer/General. COhtractor/Desiqners Ryan Companies US, Inc. is the Owner and MasterDeveloper of the project. Ryan is also the Applicant and Designer for Lots. 2 through 7 of the 25.1 acre I submitted for platting and included in the Retail PUD in this application.. The primary contacts for the project are listed below: I Ryan Companies US, Inc. Telephone: 612-492-4000 50 South Tenth_Street, Suite 300 Fax: 612-492-3000 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 I Mark Schoening, Director of Development Email: mark.schoeninq@rvancompanies.com I Marie McCallum, Environmental Coordinator Email: marie.mccallum@rvancompanies.com I Genevieve McJilton, Project Manager Email: qenevieve.mciilton@rvancompanies;com Lee Koppy, PE, Project Engineer I Email: lee.koppy@rvancompanies.com PeterMcEnery, ASLA, Landscape Architect Email: peter.mcenerv@rvancompanies.com 1- Judy Hermanson, Real Estate Legal Assistant Email: iudy.hermanson@rvancompanies.com I 2 I R:'- CIVI L\PROJ ECTS\Dean Lakes\lndividual Lots\3rdAddn\_ Engineering Data\Dean-Lakes-Narrative.doc I I Developer of Lot 1 I Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.will purchase and develop Lot 1. Lowe's has included plans in the submittal package that were prepared by their consultant to construct a 116,000 SF home improvemEmtstore. Primary contact is: I Lowe's, Inc. Telephone: 630-548-7514 . 1952 McDowell Road, Suite 101 Fax: 630-527-8830 I Naperville, I L 60563 Robert R. Fiebig, III, Site Development Manager I Email: robert.rJiebeq@lowes.com Land Surveyor , I Westwood Professional Services is the registered land surveyor forthe Dean Lakes Third.Addition. The contact information and primary contacts for the project are: I Westwood Professional Services Telephone: 952-937-5150 7599Anagram Drive Fax: 952-937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 I Scott Gyllen, RLS Email: scott.qyllen@westwoodps.com I Shannon Klundt Email: shannon.klundt@westwoodps.com I Co-Applicant's Consultant Enqineer Ozark Civil. Engineering, Inc. is the design civil engineer for the Lowe's parcel. They have designed and prepared plans for construction of the site elements on I Lot 1. Contactinformation is listed below: Ozark Civil Engineering, Inc. Telephone: 913-310-0470 11285 Strang Line Road Fax: 913-310-0261 I Lenexa,KS 66215 Scott McGee, PE, Regional Vice President I Email: smcqee@ozarkcivil.com Co-Applicant's Architect I Boice-Raidle Rhea Architects are the architects for Lowe's on the project. They' have prepared the building elevations andsignage plans for Lot 1.- I BRR Architects, Inc. Telephone: 913-262-9095 6700 Antioch Plaza, Suite 300 Fax: 913-236-3497 I Merriam, KS 66204 John E. Quinton, Jr., AlA I Email: jquinton@BRRARCH.com 3 I R:\_ CIVI L \PROJECTS\Dean Lakes\1 ndividual Lots\3rdAddn\_ Engineering. Data\Dean-Lakes-Narrative.doc I I II. APPLICATION REQUESTS I The attached Dean Lakes Third Addition application requests approval of a . ,l ,........ PreliminaryPlat and Final Plat forOutlots N, 0, and Q, Dean Lakes First . I Addition, and a RetaiLP.U.D. for the parcels currently platted asOutlots N andQ. The Retail P.U.D. includes requested variations from City standards. I The application also requests approval of Conditional Use Permits for Lots.1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the proposed Retail PUD. A complete list of applications, variations, and calculated fees are summarized below. I Preliminary Plat Application Ryan Companies is requesting approval ofa Preliminary Plat for the subdivision I of Outlots Nand Q of Dean Lakes First Addition into -seven lots, and a re-plat of Outlot O. I . Lot 1 is .13.0 acres and is the proposed site for a future Lowe's home improvement store. . Lot 2 is 1.41-acres and is the proposed site for a Class II Restaurant. I . Lot 3 is 1.20 acres and is the proposed site'fora Fast Food Restaurant that would include a drivethru. . Lot 4 is 1.20 acres and is the proposed site for a small retailbuildingthat I would include a casual food user with a drive thru. . Lot 5 is 1.52 acres and the proposed site for a Class II Restaurant.. . Lot 6 is 3:57 acres and the proposed site for a general retail site for a I 50,000 SF user. . Lot 7 is 325 acres and the proposed site for a general retail site for a I 30,000 SF uSer. . Outlot A(Former Outlot 0) is 1.84 acres and is a conservation easement. I Final Plat Application Our application requests a concurrent review of the preliminary and final plats for this project. This request is being made in an effort to expedite the review I process to allow construction to begin as early as possible in 2005, a factor of key importance both to Ryan Companies and Lowe's Home Improvement. I This process worked well for the Dean Lakes Secon9 Addition,.and given-our increased familiarity with the City process and the existence of documents that can now be used as templates for the Third Addition, we would expect the I process to be straightforward, Retail Planned Unit Development I We are requesting to have the retail portion of this project reviewed as a Retail PUD. The process is central to the overall development of Dean Lakes in that it allows flexibility in design standards to maximize efficiency of drive lanes, parking I lots, and internal setbacks. 4 I R:\_ CIVIL\PROJECTS\Dean Lakes\lndivtdual Lots\3rdAddn\_Engineering Data\Dean-Lakes-Narrative.doc I I The process is also central to the development of Dean Lakes in that it allows the . I development of this large 27 .0 acre parcel of land to occuras a cohesive unit with complimentary uses rather than as a collection of independent lots. Specific operational and maintenance documents will be filed that will assure the private maintenance of common areas. I Conditional Uses I Under the Retail PUD process, we are requesting the following conditional uses: Lot 1 - L()we's is requesting approval for a conditional use under Sec. . . I '11.36, Subd~ 3, D."Open sales lots or any use having exterior storage of goods for sale." A plan sheet included in the submittal package identifies specific locations for the storage of goods. I . Lots 2 and 5 - Under Sect. 11.36, Subd. 3~; F., -Class lI.Restaurants are a conditional use in the 81 district. We are requesting approval ofthese uses within this Retail PUD. ' I . Lots 3and4 - Under Sect. 11.36, Subd. 3.,J., Uses with a drive-up or drive-thru window require a condition use permit. We are requesting approval ofthese uses within this R~tail PUD. I Variations . Ryan Companies is requestingjhe approval of the following variations from the I . standard City ordinances: . Required Number of Parkinq Stalls I Parking counts are shown on the attached. Site Plan drawings for both individual lots and the overall project The overall parking count is 1.04 stalls I per 200 SF, which meets the Retail PUD requirement of 1 stall per 200 SF (Sect. 11.61.", Subd.4., Table 2,3.11. shopping centers). I The parking stalls have been intentionally distributed to meet the demands of the proposed uses. For example; Class \I restaurants are designed with a I higher ratio of parking stalls to building SF, whereas the mid-size retail uses on Lots 6 and 7 are less heavily parked. I This is consistent with both the spirit of the overall PUD for Dean Lakes, and the Retail' PUDapplied for here. Considered individually, rather than as parts of a whole, some lots would contain far more parking spaces than their users I require, given the shared nature of the plan design. Impervious Surface for Lots 1 and 7 I Ordinance Sect. 11.36., Subd. 6., 8. permits maximum impervious coverage of 75% for a lot in the 81 District. On an individuallot-by-Iot basis, Lots 1 and 7 exceed this amount. However, on an overall basis, the proposed 27.0-acre I Dean Lakes Third Addition plat is proposed to be 74.9% impervious. 5 I R:I_ CIVI L \PROJECTSIDean Lakesll ndividual Lotsl3rdAddnl_Engineering DataIDean-Lakes-Narrative.doc I I BuildinQ Setback for Lots 6 and 7 . I . Ordinance Sect. 11.36., Subd. 6:, C. requires 20-foot side yard building setbacks. The proje9t proposes a zero building setback between Lots6and 7, standard for the sort of retail uses that are proposed for that area and I central to the_ efficiency of those lots.. Parkinq Setbacks for all lots within Retail PUD I Ordinance Sect. 11.36., Subd. 6., C. This project proposes contiguous parking and access roads with zero setbacks. By doing so, the efficiency of the parking lot circulation is maximized, thereby encouraging shared parking I between uses and maximizing green space in larger contiguous areas.' DrainaQe.and Utilitv Easements I There are the existing public drainage and utility easernentsalong the adjacenfpublic rights-of-ways along the west, north, and east prqject boundaries. The easement is 12-feet wide along County Road 83 and 10-feet I wide along Dean Lakes Blvd. and Dean Lakes Trail. These easements around the perimeter of the project provide an adequate corridor for private utilities to serve the seven proposed lots within this proposed plat. I Therefore, we are proposing to exclude interior utility easements that the City generally r~quires around the perimeter of each of the seven lots. Since six I of the proposed lots has frontage on a public right-of-way, private utilities. (phone, gas, electric, cable, etc.) would serve each building from main feeds in the easements along the public right-of-way. I When private utility lines are forced to cross one lot to reach another, such as the case would be to serve Lot 6, services would be installed-behind the curb I and gutter, not along the .5-foot perimeter drainage and utility easements that are generally located down the centerline of roadways or parking surfaces. I Also, within this retail development, drainage between lots is handled by an overall shared private storm sewer drainage system, not by channelized flow I down lot lines as is generally the case in residential subdivisions. . Although we are confident in our proposed lotsizes, we may need to shift a I lot line slightly in the future to accommodate a specific project. If the interior easements are not platted, this could be accomplished administratively vs. coming before council at a public hearing for an easement vacation. I SiQnaQe This application also requests a variation for the Lowe's building signage. I Please review "IV.. Signage" section of this narrative for more information. I 6 . I R:'- CIVI L \PROJECTS\Oean Lakes\1 ndividual Lots\3rdAddn'-Engineering Oata\Dean-Lakes-Narrative.doc I I Permit Applications I Each of these projects will be brought before the City staff again for approval of construction permits either in the form of a grading permit, Litility permit, or. buildingpermitbefore beginning construction. We understC!nd that the City will - review the proposed plans in greater detail at that time, including conformance to I . . ... - the conditions of approval are set forth in the approval ofthis application. I Additionally, the final plat check list suggests that the following permits al'sobe addressed with this application: I Scott COunty permit to work within the riqht-of-way We have submitted plans currently to Scott County public works for their review. Our proposed construction includes grading, connection to public I utilities, and construction of a segment of sidewalk within the County Road 83 right-of-way. We expect that the approvafofthese plans by Scott County would be a condition of approval. I Minnesota Pollution C6ntrolAqencvNPDES Permit Ryan Companies has kept its original permit open forthe mass grading of the I overall 282.8 acre site. As lots are sold to other parties, Ryan has been transferringthe permitintothe new ownership. This trahsferwill be completed for the, Lowe's lot and for any other lots within theard Addition that I are developed by outside parties. We expect that this would be address at the time of grading permit or building permit review. ' I City street cut permit for utility installation' As required, we will submitright-of-way permit applications for any work that I is proposed within the City right-of-way. This includes Connections to the public storm sewer,' sanitary sewer, and water main. Propo~ed construction will not require any cutting into the recently constructed public roadways. I We do not anticipate submitting permitsto MnDOT. All sanitary sewer will be private, so we will notbe submitting permit application to the MPCA for sewer extension. We are not petitiohing for any work to be completed under Chapter I 429 for this project. Common Interest Community Subdivisions I Ryan Companies and Lowe's will prepare a declaration document that assures that perpetual access is provided to each lot in the PUD,assures that utilities are I provided to each lot, as~ures that stormwater drainage will be conveyed from each lot into the public storm sewer system, and establishes an association to maintain common areas. I We intend to use the Dean Lakes Second Addition declaration document as a basis for this document and expect that the approvals would be conditional upon I this document being exec;uted. 7 I R:\_ CIVI L \PROJ ECTS\Dean Lakes\1 ndividual Lots\3rdAddn"- Engineering Data\Dean-Lakes-Narrative.doc I I III. CONSISTENCY WITH PREVIOUS APPROVALS I ~ Prior to submitting this application, Ryan Companies and Lowe's met with City . staff to review the project and its consistency ,^"ith the overall spirit of the Dean Lakes develQpment. We have reviewed the previously approved documents and I are confidentthat the projectis fully consistent with previous approvals. Overall Planned Unit Development I We have reviewed the overall Dean Lakes PUD Agreement as well as Resolution 5986 approving the Planned Unit Development Overlay District No. 19, Dean Lakes on December 9, 2003. I The resolution included twelve conditions of approval. Most conditions have already been satisfied. The exceptions are items #3,5,6,7, and 8. These I~ items will be either addressed during the approval of this project, or during subsequent stages of review as described below: I 3. Landscape requirements will be verified at the time of building permit review, and the applicant will submit a landscaping bond for 115% of the value of the landscaping. I 5. Lighting plans: Resolution 5986 required lighting plansto be approved at the' time of buildingpermitapproval. However, City policy requires lighting plans to besubmitted with Retail PUD review; therefore,these plans are included I with the application. 6. Screening: mechanical rooftop units are proposed to be screened from the front of the Lowe's and the adjacent retail buildings by parapet across the I front building elevation.' Screening of these units from County Road 16 will be _ partially accomplished by landscaping near the top of the conservation easement ana partially by painting the units to match the color of the roof. I Additionally, Lowe's is proposing tube steel fencing, along with a 100% opaque mesh around the staging area, and painting of the upper third of the south building elevation. Lowe's is also proposing a screening wall for their I trash compactor and truck well. Screening of trash compactors, receptacles, and/ordumpstersthroughout the remainder of the development will meet requirements. Details will be submitted during the building permit review. I 7. Building Materials: Lowe's has presented building elevations to staff and based on feedback received, they expectthat the proposed building materials I satisfy City requirements. Ryan's building designs for Lots 2-7 will be of similar materials and architectural theme as other projects within the development. Detailed building elevations will be submitted during,building I permit review. 8. Signage: Overall project signage and buildingsignageJor the proposed Lowe's building are included in this application. Please refer to the "IV. I Signage" section of this' narrative. I 8 I R:\_ CIVI L\PROJECTS\Dean Lakes\lndividual Lots\3rdAddn\_Engineering Data\Dean-Lakes-Narrative.doc I I Resolution Approving the Dean Lakes FirstAddition Final Plat I We havealso reviewed Resolution 5987, which approved the Dean Lakes plat This resolution included 25 conditions (I. items A. thru G., and II. itemsA. thru R) All of the conditions have been satisfied, with the exception ofthose listed below: I II. A. Building construction, sewer, water service, fire protection and access will be reviewed for code compliance at the time of building permit application. I F. Work within the Scott County right-of-way on both the east side of Co. Rd. 83 and the north side of Co. Rd. 16 will require a Scott County permit J. All irrigation systems proposed with. this project will utilize rain sensors and I comply with the City'swater restrictions. N. Proposed drainage & utility easements are shown on the final plat includedwith this application. Watermain easements will be prepared I and filed as a separate document for segments of water main as they are constructed. P. Under the variation request above, we propose to plat without interior I drainage and utility easements. However, there is an existing drainage and utility easementaround the perimeter of the property. Therefore, if the overall development is considered to be a "building cluster", this I variation would not violate condition II. P. which reads, "Applicant shall provide 10. feet of total easement between building clusters." I Alternative Urban Areawide Review We have reviewed Resolution 5930. adopting the Revisionito the Final AUARfor the Valley Green Corporate Center/Dean's Lake R~sidential project Specifically, I we. have reviewed both traffic and stormwater impacts and have concluded.that they are consistent with the development that was evaluated in the AUAR I Traffic Proposed land uses within the Dean Lakesdevelopmentthatwere used to I prepare tne 20.0.3 AUAR estimated 16,982 trips per day coming from this site. This estimated total was less than a preceding AUAR that was prepared in 20.0.0.. . The 20.0.0. AUAR calculated a total of 31,760.trips per day. . I The land uses within the fully-developed Dean Lakes development, including those proposed In the Dean Lakes Third Addition, generate an estimate.9 23,929 I trips per day. While this estimate is greater than the 20.0.3 AUAR, it is less than the daily trip total that was published in the 20.0.0. AUAR ~ the report that was the basis for the design of the recently constructed County Rd83 and County Rd 16. I The PM Peak Hourjs the event that would govern design constraints for this site. Similarly, the proposed design generates an estimate of 2,724 trips/hr, the 20.0.3 I AUAR estimated 2,147 trips/hr, and the 20.0.0. AUAR estimated 4,180. trips/hr. I 'I 9 R.:\_CIVIL\PROJECTS\Dean Lakes\lndividual Lots\3rdAddn\_Engineering Data\DeanoLakes-Narrative.doc _ -I I In summary, the proposed land uses generate traffievolumes less than the I volumes that were used as the basis for the design of adjacent roadways. A detailed traffic n,lemo is included in the Appendix. I Stormwater The overall stormwater runoff rates from the proposed development within the project area are.less than the designed rates designed for in the final Stormwater I Report prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, dated January 23, 2004. Runoff.from the site is-conveyed offsite through a public storm sewer system I collec!edbyfour storll1 sewer stubs accepting rates of 11.76,10.30,67.89, and 23.52 cfs, fora total offsite peak flow of 113.5 cfs for a 1 O-year storm event. Runoff is conveyed offsite to the ecological storm sewer ponding system that is I located within the existing conservation'easements and landscaped with native plantings. I The offsite rates proposed are 7.5 cfs, 8.6 cfs, 66.6 cfs, and.18.9 cfs respectively through the four existing storm sewer stubs for a total offsite rate of 101.6 cfs. I MasterPlan The City of Shakopee developed the "Dean's Lake Area Master Plan" in July of I 2001. From the City's perspective, the objective defined in the master plan was to maximize the community values associated with the development of this area to exceed that which is already provided under City ordinance. I In 2001-02, the City's consultant, Brauer& Associates, Ltd. (with Applied Ecological Services, Inc.) worked with Ryan Companies on behalf of the City to I prepare a development plan consistent with the conservation development approach to planning defined earlier by the "Dean's Lake Area. Master Plan." I The keyvalues of this document were: 1. Maintaining an ecological ~rotection zone and adjoining buffer zone along the lakeshore. I 2. Preserving as much natural open space along thewest side of the iake as possible. I 3. Providing a linear trail corridor along the west side of the lake that links to other trails defined under the master.plan. 4. Expanding natural open spaces and trails into and through the I development area in a meaningful way. . 5. Using ecological-based approaches to stormwater management. 6. Reducing the extent of impervious surface to the extent possible. I 7. Establishing an ecological stewardship program for natural areas. From these established goals came the development plan that included: I establishing the buffer zone along the west shore of Dean's Lake; preserving I 10 R:\_ CIVI L \PROJ ECTS\Dean Lakes\lndividual Lols\3rdAddn\_Engineering Data\Dean-Lakes-Narrative.doc I I 83.5 acres of conservat,ion easement throughout the development, constructing . I an extensive system of public trails through the project area in a meaningful way, and restoring native ,landscaping throughoutthe, project, including in the areas . reserved for stormwater ponding. The "Ecological Restoration and Management I Plan" summarized below developed a specific plan design to accomplish the key values of the "Dean's Lake Area Mater Plan" within the Dean Lakes project. I Ecological Restoration and Management Plan In late 2003, Applied Ecological Services, Inc. prepared the above-referenced plan to establish the design criteria for restoring and managing native prairie, I savanna, woodland andwetl.and vegetation on the Dean Lakes property. This plan wasdesigned to meet the following objectives: I 1. Restore conservation areas oUhe property to native prairie, savanna, woodland and wetland vegetation, and to enhance aesthetics and ecosystem health. I 2. Develop a public trail system throughout the property to provide access to restored areas for educational and passive recreational use. 3. Improve aesthetic appearance and ecological function of the site's open I space by integrating ecological restoration and native landscaping into the dev.eloPrnent. I 4. Develop' a long-term ecological stewardship program for the natural open space. I The Dean Lakes Third Addition project will implement the landscaping plan for the conservation easement Outlot A (formerly OutlotO). The I~mdscapingdesign Was provided by Applied Ecological Services, Inc. This native planting theme is I also carried into the developed lots by proposing similar species throughoutthe project. < The plan also proposes new trail segments to each of the lots from the extensive public trail system. I 'IV. SIGNAGE I This application includes project signage, area identifications signs, and building signageforthe Lowe's.store. I Proiect Siqnaqe The Dean Lakes Third Addition project area has frontage on four public rights-of- way: Co. Rd. 83, Dean Lakes Boulevard, Dean Lakes Trail, and Co. Rd. 16. I. Since multiple retail establishments are proposed within the overall project area, one free-standing business complex sign is allowed per street frontage, for a total of four project signs. (Per condition #8 of Resolution 5986, also by City I Ordinance, Sec. 11.50, Subd. 4., I.) I I 11 R:\_ CIVI L \PROJECTS\Dean Lakes\1 ndividual Lots\3rdAddn'- Engineering Data\Dean-Lakes-Narrative.doc I I , We are however, limiting our project to two project signs described as fOllows: I . A sign along Co. Rd. 83 identifying Lowe's and retail users on Lots 9 and 7. This sign is proposed tobe20-feet tall, and includes a totalof92.74 I SF, which is 32.26SFless that the 125 SF thatis allowable under Sect. 11.70, .Subd. 8, "Highway Business Zone", B. . The sign is proposed to be a tall monument style sign that will be constructed 'of materials similar to I . the existing Ryland Savannah Point Sign.. Refer to the sign plan included in this package for details. . A monument sign along Dean Lakes Parkway identifying retail/restaurant I uses in Lots 2-5. This sign is designed to be consistent with -Ryland'~ . Savannah Point sign, arid prqposes 72 SF, which is 53 SF less than the allowable 125 SF. I Area . Identification Siqn We also propose an Area Identification Sign perSect.11.70, Subd. 8., "Highway I Business Zone". D. Adetail of this proposed monument-style sign is included in the application. The sign would serye as the identification of the overall 282.8 acre Dean Lakes development. I The Area.ldentification Sign is proposed to be located in southeast corner of the intersection of Co. Rd. 83 and Dean Lakes Parkway, with a matching sign I proposed in the northeast corner ofthe same intersection. The matching sign is located within the Dean Lakes Second Addition and will be applied for under a I separate application. This will be a monument sign for the purpose of identifying the entire Dean Lakes mixed use development, and would also match the look and feel of the Ryland Savannah Point sign. . I Buildinq Siqnage Lowe's is also proposing building signage for their store, details of Which are I included in the application package. Based on Ordinance Sec. 11.70, Subd. 8, "Highway Business Zone", A., recently adopted City Ordinance allows a total of 400 SF of bljilding signage: (200 SF along the front building face, 100 SF along I the eastfrontage to Dean Lakes Trail, and 100 SF along the south frontage to Co. Rd. 16). I Given the importance of the Highway 169 frontage, Lowe's is proposing to place all wall signage on the front elevation. There are a total of three signs, each located .above an entry way into'the store. All three signs total 453 SF in area. I As discussed above, Lowe's would be allowed 400 SF under the new ordinance. Lowe's is requesting a slight variationfrom the allowable 400 SF (53 SF). Please consider that the two monumentsigns proposed are a total of 85.26 SF less than I the allowable SF for these signs. In addition, the monument signs will be constructed of similar, attractive building materials, which will match the overall Dean Lakes Development. I I 12 R:\.. CIVI L \PROJECTS\Dean Lakes\lndividual Lots\3rdAddn\.. Engineering Data\Dean-Lakes-Narrative.doc 1 I V. SCHEDULE I Lowe's would like to begin construction of their new home improvement store as soon as possible. They are pursuing the following schedule: I' Lowe's ProjectKick-Off Dec. 9,2004 Initial Meeting with City Staff Dec. 15,2004 Ryan/Lowe's Refine Site/Building Design Dec. 28, 2004 I Follow-up Meeting with City Staff , Jan. 4,2005 Preliminary/Final Plat/Retail PUD Application Date: Jan. 19, 2005 - Submit Final Plat to Scott County Jan. 19,2005 I Environmental Advisory Committee Meeting Feb.. 9, 2005 Staff. Review. Meeting: Feb. 16,2005 Revise/Resubmit Preliminary Plans: Feb. 28,2005 I Parks and Recre'ation Board: Feb. 28,2005 Receive Final Plat Comments from County: Mar. 3,' 2005 Planning Commission Preliminary Plat Hearing: Mar. 3, 2005 I City Council Preliminary/Final Plat Hearing: Mar. 15, 2005 City Staff Review Meeting . Mar. 23,2005 I Ryan/Lowe's Re-Submitto Satisfy all Conditions Apr.4, 2005 Get Signatures on Plat/Submit for Filing: Apr. 8, 2005 Building Permit Application Date: Apr. 15, 2005 Start Construction: Jun. 1,2005 I Ryan Companies hopes to begin submitting building permit applications for Lots I 2 thrdugh 7 in spring of 2005. The entire build out of Lots 2 through 7 is expected to take 24 to 36 months. I VI. CONCLUSION Ryan Companies is excited to have partnered with Lowe's, Inc. to be proposing I to construct one of the first Lowe's Home Improvement stores in the Twin Cities inthe.Cityof Shakopee. This anchor store, and other future retail development that will follow, will provide convenience aswell as ernployment opportunities for I Shakopee residents. I I I I I 13 R:L CIVI L \PROJ ECTS\Dean Lakes\I ndividual Lots\3rdAddn\_ Engineering Data\Dean-Lakes-Narrative.doc I I ~' " ~ I I ' ~ " ' , I ~ I . . TRAFFIC .1 " - c I . MEMO I . I . I I I 1 I I I I I I,', '~ ' I ' , - . - ." . -,-,", '. ,..,. '. . ,- . RI-K... Engineering; -PlannJng .. Surveyi,ng. Landscape Architecture I' e KUUSISTO ,J-,TD ) .~ I' MEMORANDUM I I TO: Mark Schoening, Ryan Companies Lee Koppy, Ryan Companies 1- COPY: Nick Erpelding,EIT FROM: I; Vem Swing, PE I DATE; January 18, 2005 I RE: Trip Generation Estimates for Currently Proposed Land Uses Dean Lakes - Shakopee,JVlN I RLK Project No. 2005-_-M I Introduction: A trip generation analysis. was undertaken to estimate the amount of traffic the currently proposed Dean I Lakes development. will add to ~he area, roadway network. The amount' of site-generated, traffic is compared to that estimated in the approved 2003 and 200Q AUARs. It is noted the traffic estimated for the 2000 AUARwas the basis for the recent improvements,to roadways surrounding the site. I;~ Trip Generation: The numbers of vehicular trips to and from the site during the AM and PM peak hours were estimated I using the ~ata and methodologies contained in the 7th Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Table 1 sUmn:larizes the estimated numbers of trips. As referred to on Table 1, "Net" Totals refer to the amount of new traffic using the site after deducting 'shared trips. A 15% deduction for shared trips was assumed. I I As shown on Table 1, the currently proposed land uses are estimated to generate 23,929 trips on a d.aily basis, after adjusting for shared trips. In comparison, the number of trips, to be generated by the 'land uses I as l;l.nalyzed for the 2003 and 2000 AUARs are 16,982 and 31,760, respectively, as shown in Tables 2 and 3, below. On a peak hour basis, the currently proposed land uses will generate 1,780/2,315 trips for the AMI PM peak periods, compared with 1,721 / 1,718 and 3,252 / 3,528 for the 2003 and 2000 AUAR1and I uses. 0 /1 , Offices: Hibbing . MinnelOflka . Ham Lake, . TWltlPorts (952) 933-0972 . 6110 Blue Circle Drive' Suite 100 . Mirme.tohka. MN55343 . FAX (952) 933-1153 , E'qtl(ll Opportunity Employer I I I MarkSchoeriing, Lee Koppy .' January 18, 2005 ~ . , Table 1 I' ... :Trip GenerationEstimat~s - Currently Proposed Land Uses. . AM ' AM PM . Daily Land Use Size Enter Exit Enter PM Exit , ToJal '.' " , .' I Single Family Housing. 201 units 38 113 " 128 75 '. 1,924 Condominium/Townhouse 364 units 27. 133 127 62 .'. 2,133 Medical-Dental Office Bldg. 20,000 s.f. 39 . 10 20 54 723 I ' Specialtv Retail Center ' 18,000 s.f. 0 0 21 ' 27 798 HTO (Sit-Down) Restaurant 5,400 s.f. 32 30 .36 23 687 . Drive-in Bank 4,400s.f. 30 'I 24 101 101 1,085 . ,I. , Hotel 90 rooms 31 20 28 25 735 .' Quality Restaurant 8,000s.f. 3 3 , 40 . 20 .' 720 HTO(Sit-Down) Restaurant '5,900 s.t 35 33 39 ' 25 750 . Fast Food - w/Driye Tliru 3,500 s.f. . 95 91 63 . 58. 1,736 I HTO (Sit-Down) Restaurant. 6,000 s.f. ,36 33 40 26 763 Specialty Ret.ail Center 65,000 s.f. 0 0 95 121 3,546 Home Improye. Sunerstore 116,000sJ. 75 .64 . 134' . 151 3,457 . I. Warehousing , 736,500 s.f. 272 60 87 260 3,653 General Office Building 494,500 s.f. 674 92 125 612 5,444 Gross Totals 1,388 706 . 1,084 1,640 28,152 ,I 2,094 , 2,724 . .' .... . 15%'Reduction for Shared 208. ,I.' 106 '163 246 4223 ' Trips . 314 409 .. I NefTotals 1,180 600 921 1,394 23,929 . 1,780 ' . 2,315 I Table 2 Trip Generation Estimates - 2003 AUAR Land Uses Land Use Size AM AM . PM PM Exit Daily I Enter Exit Enter Total Single Family Housing 201 units 38 . 113 130 73 1,924 . Condominium/Townhouse 364 units 27 . 133 132 65 2,133 I . Hotel . 90 rooms 35 25 31 '. 33 803 Specialty Retail Center 7,500 s.f. 0 0 9 11 . .305 HTO (Sit-Down) Restaurant 18,000 s.f. 87 80 118 78 2,346 , Drive-in Bank 4,000 s.L 29 22 110 ' 110 1,061 I Gas/SerViCe w/Convenience 10 fuel pos. 51 . 51 67 67 1,628 Warehousing 736,500 s.f. 272 59 90 286 3,653 General Office Building 494,500 s.f. . 679 92 125 612 5,445 . I Gross Totals - 1,218 ' 575 812 1,335 19,298 1,793 2,147 - I . Reduction for Shared Trips. . 4% 20% 12% Net Totals 1,169 552 650 1,068 16,982 1,721 1,718 . I I RLK-Kuusisto,Ltd. Page 2 of3 Dean Lakes G:llTeam Swing\project shortcutslpendinglryan - dean la)<es trip gon comparisonlTrip Gon Comp.doc 200S-.:.........-M I I ,,~ '.1. Mark Schoening, Lee Koppy January 18,2005 I ~ Table 3 Tri) Generation Estimates - 2000 AUAR Land Uses. " , I ' Land Use Size AM AM PM PM Exit Daily I Enter Exit Enter Total Bldg. Materials kLumber . 70,000 s.f. 124 61 135 153 2,506 I Conv. Store w/ Gas 5,000 s.f. 114 114 . 152 152 4,235 Sit Down Re'staurant 5,000 s.f. 24 22 33 21 647 Hotel 125 rooms 33 ~ 21 . - 32 28 1,035 Fast Food Restaurant 5,000 s.f. . 127 122 87 80 2,428 I General Retail 40,000 s.f. -56 36 165 179 3,776 , Office , 1,100,000 s.f., , 1,245 170 236 1,236 9,553 I Office/Warehouse 1,650,000 s.f. 1,323 233 '. 309 1,153 13;128 - 3,046 780 1,178 " 3,002 Gross Totals 3,826 4,180r 37,365 . , 15% Reduction for Shared 457 I 117 ' '172 . 450 5,605 I Trips . . 574 622 2,589 663 , 976 I 2,552 Net Totals 3,252 31,760 . , 3,528 , I , Summary: I Alth(:mghthe currently proposed land uses are estimated to generate approximately 41%niore trips on a daily basis than the land uses approved in the 2003 AUAR, they will generate 25% less traffic than the I land uses approved inthe 2000 AUAR, on which the design of area roadways, including CSAH 83 and CR 16, were based. I Thank' you for the opportunity to address your traffic engineering concerns. If you have any questions, . please call either Nick Erpelding or Vern Swing at 952~933-0972. I I I I I I RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd. Page 3 00 ' Dean Lakes G:IITeam Swinglp,.oject shortcutslpendinglryan . dean lakes trip gencomparisonlTrip Gen Comp.doc 2005--.:--M I I . I I I' I I . LIGHTING I I DETAILS I I I I I I I I - I I I I MAGNUSQUARE@ II SERIES Vertical Lamp MSV Flat Glass I . I I I B I T ""...,,""""''''''''''''''''''', I A ,..'......,....,........."'.....,11.; 1 I Housing Rugged, one piece aluminum, formed and welded,allows no MSV access to weather. A B Lens 1 Door Frame I 14.9" 21.0" sq. Extruded aluminum door with sealed tempered flat glass lens. Door 378 mm 533 mm is hinged and has gasketed seal to housing when secured with two Hubbell Gard@ Fasteners, Ballast I . Mounted to a galvanized steel end support, which ties intoi\rl11.~9r secure support. Optical ,Full cutoff performance with maximum uniformity. Segmented I reflector system produces excellent pole spacing capability. Additional Featur~s Lektrocote@ powder coat finish provides protection to aluminum, construction and lasting appearance. ,AU units supplied with lamp , " I for installation convenience. UL and CSA NRTUC certified for wet ' locations. Multiple optical capabilities and mounting accessories are available. ;., "< , , . . . . . ~ .-:~; ': :;,',,;' :;;-~Gs~:~.,. ?~.::l,.;:.Ordering:lnformati.c;n.;y.' ..:; /~~~~ ~~~;~\~' ~ ~ ;7~W,/'B< )" , , '1 < ~ ~ 1~ 0' /'h ... ~'4$ I O' " x oR. \, "-'''0 ,"" . '0 voltage series mounting wattage source distribution finish options I - I MSV I A I I I I I I I .' SERIES DISTRIBUTION LEKTROCOTE FINISH , MSV Magnusquare@ II Series FI Type I 1 Bronze I Vertical Lamp. Flat Glass FP Type III 2 Black FT Forward Throw 3 Gray MOUNTING fW Type V sq. 4 White A IArm mount I VOLTAGE OPTIONS WATTAGE 1 SOURCE 5 480V 10" arm shipped in fixture 400 H Metal Halide A1 6 347V carton 1000 H Metal Halide QuadTap@ (120, 208, 240, A4 4" arm shipped in fixture cartor! I 1000 P Pulse Start 8 277V) Twist~Lock photocontrol 400 S High Pressure Sodium E 50 Hz 220/240V C ' 1 receptacle (specify voltage) P R(X) (photocontrol ordered separately) I F(X)1, Fusing (specify voltage) Note: E.P.A. .2.8 Sq. Fl. (Fixture only) R42 4"round pole adapter shipped in fixed carton I RS2 5" round pole adapter shipped in fixed carton 1. Substitute voltage for "X" (1.120V;2.208V;3.240V;4-277V;5480V;6.347V) 2. Must select option A 1 or A4 Accessories must be ordered separately. See Accessories. I Comments _ See back for II -\5" ....~ Photometries .., I ~q~~~@ :~::~;:igb~:ng, Inc., 2000 Electric Way. Christiansburg. Virginia 24073, (540) 382-6111' Fax (540) 382c1526 Architectural Cutoff om 2- 5/01 MSV/FIat ~ - I MAGNUSQUARE@" SERIES Vertieal Lamp MSV . Flat Glass 1- Photometries I TEST NO D: HP - 08637 DATE I 2-22-2001 CAT. NO..: MSVAIOOOH-FPx-x I LUM I NA I RE LAMP CLASS I F ICAT I ON SOCKET pOS.: FI XED TYPE: 1 aaaw MET. HAL. D] STR I BUT] ON: SHORT REFLECTOR:ALUMINUM ANSI: MIOOO/U/BT37 I .D.: OS-I t TYPE: I I I SPECULAR ENVELOPE: BT 37 , L. C. L. :7.0 I NCHES CONTROL: FULLCUTOFF I ENCLOSURE:CLEAR, FLAT GLASS I LAMP'Sl at LUMENS/LAMP: 110000 GENERAL . r---21.000~ . JEST DISTANCE: 36 FEET I' . . '. I LIGHT FLUX VALUES '. . '. . LUMENS PERCENT To approx i mate perrormance ror I -r OF LAMP simi lor lamps with dirrerent . ..... DOWNWARD 39091 35 5 Lume. ns., multiply. Lumens,. Lux STREETSIDE . and Footcandles by this ratio: L.C. ' DOWNWARD ~ 14.870 HOUSES I DE 33052 30.0 I'd'.' · . ST~~~~~?DE 0 0.0 ;.' . . UPWARD 0 0 0 RATIO _ SELECTED LAMP LUMENS c HOUSESIDE . - 110000 G.C. TOTAL 72143 65.6 I I I SOLUX' DIAGRAM II I SOFOOTCANDLE DIAGRAM I MOUNTl NG HE I GHT: ) 0 . 67 METERS MOUNTl NG HE I Gf-jT: 35 FEET I . -- - -- Ha I r Max i mu. mCand I epower Tr. ace - - - - - Coef'f' i c i ent of' Ut i I i zat i on Curves . Maximum Candlepower. 180. 3 MAXIMUM AT H=56.20 V=65.50 0.1 0.2 0.3 0." 0.5 0.8 0.7 ~ )1 if ' ~V -~ ~ ~t--r-.r....r-... '" \ 1\ I ~ 2 'If / /): ~ . ~ L- -~,,"'"'i'- )1\ ~\ \ ~ (V/"/J/8~~/ ~~~,~~~~ ~~ j: (~/ 11 :r 1'-. ; ,'\" I) I ~ I " ( ): I ! j.... n h~IC 1\ ::?o 0 ) 1 : r' { Crrs:J ,') \ I I ~Ol. [, I . I _ qj ~...- _ .' , , II '1, ."'.J~~ ....... I I 'I' ~ ... ~ ILRL I I \ , \ !!l \ \~:I '* '. ' I J 1 '/ :J.75LfiL- _ - - - \-\_ - _~ - - \~P~~~ w "'-', L/iI I J. II, ) I 1m2 .;\ ~~, c " , , ~'75LB--- ___ _ ~~~~~-:~::~~ :~I~L~I~ /1/ I ~ 3 . ,,~..;; K-r-~ ~ "- ~'/ ~ r~.o~ .// h.... I i-o.~~;\r-.... -....v ...1-0 ot-I o .. ""-- ....., / o I I ~ -to"".- _../ I - I I I ~ ~I ~I ~ I ~ 5 -, 7 8 . 5 .. ' 3 i.2 I 0 0 I 2 3 .. 5 8 7 3.75 2.Z5 ,0. . . RATIO OF LONGITUDINAL DISTANCE TO.MOUNTlNG HEIGHT I . MOUNT I NG HE I GHT CORRECT I ON FACTORS He,MO,;'tnt_iF~et 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 HeiMho~n:l;'e~er-s 6.10 7.62 9.14 10.6712.1913.7215.24 Factor 3.06 1.96 1.36 1.00 0.77 0.60 0.49 I TESTED TO CURRENT IES AND NEMA STANDARDS UNDER STABILIZED LABORATORY CONDITIONS. VARIOUS OPERATING FACTORS CAN CAUSE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LAB DATA AND ACTUAL FIELD MEASUREMENTS. I ~~u.";.".,,, I Hubbell Lighting,. Inc., 2000 Electric Way, Ch.ristianSburg, Virginia 24073, (540) 382-6111' Fax (540) 382-1526 . httP:/.Jwww.hubbell-ltg.comt Hubbell Canada, Inc., 870 Brock Road South, Pickering, OntarioL 1W1Z8, (905) 839-1138 . Fax (905) 839-9108 . http://www.hubbell-canada.comt I MAGNUSQUARE@ II SERIES Vertical Lamp MSV Flat Glass I ~ , " Photometries I TEST NOD: HP-08635 DATE I 2;';21-2001 CATD' NOD: MSVAIOOOH-FWx-x I LUMINAIRE LAMP CLASSIFICATION SOCKET POS.:FIXEO' TYPE: 1000W'MET. HAL. DISTRIBUTION: SHORT REFLECTOR:ALUMINUM ANSI: MIOQQ/U/BT37 LO.: OS-II TYPE: v-so SPECULAR ENVELOPE:BT 37 L.C.L.:7.0INCHES CONTROL: FULLCUTOFF I ENCLOSURE: CLEAR. FLAT GLASS I LAMPIS) 'ot LUMENS/LAMP: 110000 GENERAL r-21'OOO~ JEST DISTANCE: 36 FEET LIGHT FLUX VALUES LUMENS bfRE~~~ To approximate performance for I ~ simi lor lamps.withdifrerent s~~~~~~~gE 38981 35.4 Lumens. multiply Lumens, Lux and. Footcandles by this ratio: L.C.~ 14.870 HDJl~N:s^I~E 3898 J 35.4 I ~ UPWARD 0 STREETSIDE 0.0 UPWARD 0 0.0 RATIO = SELECTED LAMP LUMENS HOUSES IDE 110000 ,0, AL 77963 70..9 . I I . ISOLUX 0 I AGRAM I I ISOFOOTCANDLE DIAGRAM I MOUNTING HEIGHT: 10.67 METERS MOUNTING HEIGHT: 35 FEET - - - - - Ha I r Max i mum Cand I epower Trace - - -- - CoerI' i c ient or Ut i I i zat i on Curves I ~ Maximum Condlepower 180. 3 MAXIMUM AT H=45.2o V=6406O 0.1 0.2 0.3 o.~ 0.5 0.8 0.7 ~ // II:) Vr; gj - " t-- ""'" \i \ \ , C) ~ - ~ 1JI W ' ) ,...... V '" ~ t"'\ , (\,,' f\ \ 1\ I J: 2 ~ II{ 1/:// ~~) r '"'t"", -. - .) " '\ \ \ \ C) ..... i"\ z w I I- , j ~ .,,-..... ~ , ~ I . ,- & I"') I 0 ... I '" :::E ; \ ",' o. :, , '- -; .... .' > 1-00 WID '/ / / -....-\ ~ - -... ...) ) , . l.J I '" \ l '\ I z j \ < .RL 1-1 I I ~~ 1~~ / 1JI - " -\- " ........._, , 0 I-ffl.- _ '\' ,,~~ cA\ r. 1.1 ( J j 7 I tJ.75 - -- 1\1- - ~ / \1 I""" - Ul 2 -\~ r\~ rx\.1 f~ U-- - ......... V I !s" J \ 1/ / 17 / I a: 1JI I"-' .....0 W J > L!:[l.._ _ ,:- - ~. 1'0. - foo.. /' ) j ~.75 - -- Ii\. - -- ..- / .~ J < 3 \ I.~ ....... ..; I....... b.o' V I / " I!: , ~ ~ , .~ 1JI I ~ I . .......' ""'- ./ [.....c. o~ j ~ 0 ,V. I..... ~ I'--. -' V I........ 1,,0. V I- , V ~p' < ~I t-- ~ ....... a: .-' I 5 7 8 5 ~ ' 3 '2 I o 0 I 2 3 ~ 5 8 7 3.75 2.25 O' R^Tl0 OF LONGITUD1N^L DI5T^NCE TO t.1OUNT1NG HEIGHT MOUNTING HEIGHT CORRECTIONF^CTORS I He iMOh~t_ i ?PeGt' 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 He i MOt'~t U'e~~rs 6. 10 7.62 9. 14 JO; 67 12. 19 J 3 . 72 15.24 Factor 3.061.96 I.36 1.00 0.77 0.60 0.49 TESTED TO CURRENT IES AND NEMA STANDARDS UNDER STABILIZED LABORATORY CONDITIONS. VARIOUS I OPERATING FACTORS CAN CAUSE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LAB DATA AND ACTUAL FIELD MEASUREMENTS. I ~~~~~~@ Lighting, Inc. I Hubbell lighting, Inc., 2000 Electric Way, Christiansburg, Virginia 24073, (540) 382-6111 . Fax (540) 382-1526 . http://www.hubbell-ltg.com/ Hubbell Canada, Inc., 870 Brock Road South, Pickering, Ontario L 1W1Z8, (905) 839-1138 . Fax (905) 839c91 08' htlp:/Iwww.hubbell-canada.coml I MAGNUSQUARE@ II SERIES Vertical Lamp MSV Flat Glass I Ordering Information I ACCESSORY - Must be ordered separately Weight EPA Catalog Number Description Ibs kg tt2 m2 FLUSH MOUNT HARDWARE I MAL-FM Flushmount hard\:Vare - must order when no arm or adapter is desired on a pole. .25 .1. - - ARMS MSV-4-X 4" rigid arm 2 .9 .2 .02 'I MSV-10-X 10" rigid arm 5 2.3 .5 .05 MAL-KF-X Adjustable arm for flat surfaces. (10" Length) 5.7 2.6 .5 .05 KNUCKLE MAL-K-X 2 3/8" 00 tenon slipfitter for one fixture 5 2:3. - - I MAL- TK-X 2 3/8" 00 tenon slipfitter for two fixtures 1800 7 3.2 - - TENON ADAPTERS SSP-90~X Square - slipfitterfor 23/8" or 2 7/8" 00 tenons - drilled for. four fixtures 20 9.0 .4 .04 I . (10" arm required for 900 configurations) RSO-3120-X 23/8" - 2 7/8" 00 slipfitterfor max. three fixture (1200) (10" Arms Required). 20 9.0 RSD-90-X . For 10" arms only - four fixtures mai<o 900 - 4" 00 (must orderRSD-04 for each.luminaire) 20 9.0 2 3/8" or 2 7/8" 00 tenons. I WALL PLATE MAL-WP-X Cast wall plate with fixture hardware, mounts over recessed 4" outlet boxes - 5.7 2.6 - - lag hardware by others. POLE ADAPTER I RSD-04-X Nominal 4" OD pole adapter provides a flat surface for arm of fixture mounting. 1.5 .7 RSO-05-X Nominal 5" OD pole adapter provides a flat surface for arm offixture mounting. 1.7 .8 1.1 .11 GLARE SHIELD MSV-FGGS-2 Extreme glare shield for flat alass units onlv. Mounts to housing. Restricts Iighitng to anyone. 1.8 .8 1.1 .11 - I side of fixture. Black finish is standard. Note: Specify Finish - Replace X = 1 - Bronze, 2 - Black, 3 - Gray and 4 - white I '~J.' I~~~ ~ 'I 'JI I MAL-FM MAL-KF-X MSV-4-X MAL-K-X MAL-TK-X MSV-10-X I, I . I ~~ ~. I . ~ SSP-90-X MAL-WP-X RSD-04/05-X MSV-FGGS-2 I I I I ~~~~.~~ @ Lighting, InC. I Hubbell Lighting, Inc., 2000 Electric Way, Christiansburg, Virginia 24073, (540)382-6111 . Fax (540) 382-1526' http://www.hubbell-Itg.com/ Hubbell Canada, Inc., 870 Brock Road South, Pickering, Ontario L 1W1Z8, (905) 839-1138 . Fax (905) 839-9108' htlp:/Iwww.hubbell-canada.coml I I I I I I SAMPLE I I OF I I LOWE'S I I BUILDINGS I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . ~.~ " .~:.) ; . ~ ~'f j" - .. '" , ..\" ~: ~~:~~ ~ ~ .~- ~ .~ ~~~~.~ 1. ,. ,-, .... r ~ . ,-' #,t->. It. . -:-:) ~. -;;r ... .'. , . . "...f .~7... , , ~.. \' . t' ~. ~ ,""t .*,<:;I - - t','f'~~ ~ . - . ;.. I' :-'t , - /i;fA-..:~ ~ 'r ~ , ..---.;..~ ...., .......f 01 - . ~ ,IT . -"""~"". <s:.l'" I - .- ".-, l~ I~ _____ - - - :: =' ill M .~ - -- == ==-- ~ ~."-'"- ~ or~'~';"-- ---. - ~------..;:::-~ ;;-- - - ---';;"=""~-:.....- - = -- - - --- -;:::...~_ __ -.w-~ - ,.;W'<~... ~.._,...~ -~ ~,. ~-~ -, ,;'-w ..;. ~ ~ ,. .: .. .:; ~-.. .:. ,. ~ ,;, .. ., ~-... w ..: ....:(,.... ./ ,~ . ''t ,~~ II IIlI > ---- -- ---'-'-- - ---- -"--.---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ,.--- .-- - --- -- - ..-- - ~ . -;;:~..:-~.:~" :,.' ~-- :.:----~~ ;.-~:- ~ :;....:. ~ -~ ~:: ~~~_----~_ .:---::::;;::. t . I t f . -~ - h_~,t:;-: ~ -'"-~0i " ;.~:~~---.-. 4.:==:;-~- '.: .' -. - >., , _. .; "'.... '":,.-.. _.,.J.....,. . --' __.......'f- ...J~ --...~-_~..-t. J-:--,",,-- ~ ~_:.....~-...I"...~... -"'"'"'-.... ....~ -,.... i_ ~ - - __________n ----.-.- ~, 'n~._ --~--- _.~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . -- ---~-- - .,. -- - I -- . +:' . . -- ~c; ~.- - - F. - t tT:> - ~ ~ - ---- ---. -- ----.- ------------------- ..... .....r ! ' I , .. -- - - ... ~~~~,..:. == . -~ - . --." ':' ":: ~~ ~- '" ~ --~ '-.j"?J:~$-' ~.,;,;.~".;m.~~..,""-> ,~~~f~~;~~~'~, ~"~ '..-"!'" _"",,"'~~:::;y., ....:"'It,., ~'i'J' v;...~ "" 'Z;/':s."" ""~'''' ....'"'*' l_~~______.. __ ._~__.________.______ _______ ____ - - .. - .- - .. - - - - .. - . i I .... ~~- """'. '," ~ I - [ .::: .~ --- -- --~-~ I - - - I BLACK TUBUlAR STEEL FENCING WI BLACK [INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED VINYL COATED CHAINLlNK FABRIC] SIGNAGE -[lJY'~~ ~ _ _ _ E.LF.S. (4'X4' SCORE PATTERN) o 5 20 40 (LOW[$ BLUE) ",- I I 31'-4' I I ; IT (,~D(~ : ~ I U ]]}[ill~ ~ :., ~ SIGNAGE SQUAR::'~:TAGE: 34B.44 ~ Tenant ~'I~;;~I! o ~ ;" .~~;f N #f.!1 f!"e:. ~ ~ :C. .: .TE..m.ant.f.'~~.c:r....~. <0 -F.';;;t.' .. ...~~~:.. "~~'~~~~' . i _ "'~~ OO"AA"OO,^~ MOO , f.'~~_ - >~,-:~ ~~_ _ -:~ ". .'~ :',-.::'. :~-~.~~--_ .~.~~ . ~~~~::'.::;'.~ :~~~:"~~:.: ~~ ~:?;, _;~-:~;~f:?i~~-~~\~~:~~\~~<-:~';::~~[~ 1 t ~!I 10, 5' -; I "- : ,;":-;;,':. - .',-,- ,,~> . '~'-'-~;.-., - <:~'P'>;'_':_'.:3;;'-_:~ '_&,?:;;':}':",:~--:',:~'.;-.-:-,~ "-,:,':::':J:~"",~.5.,,-,::r~' ~:_...[~J0@@I___~_~ ,---:- MONUMENT SIGN NOT TO SCALE :~: i II-U--I/V.\\ ~-\ ~rD~ m=U\.~,jvtJ_)_.~ j.... T-:;:::= ,mv,-- SIGNAGE SCHEDULE ~ ~ A I 0 D 1 SIGNAGE S~E AREA - L~j~0 1. 'LOWE'S' LOGO 39.40 SF SIGNAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE: 60.11 2. 'TENANT (2) 3',4' x B', 0' ~. s 3. 3'i TOTAL SIGNAGE: -=. &f ~.1 c; TOTAL SIGNAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE: 452.61 NOTE: DASHED LINE DEPICTS AREA USED FOR SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS ta REPRESENTATION ONLY Sh k MN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION a opee, BUILDING IMAGES SHOWN ARE A REPRESENTATION OF THE DESIGN INTENT AND MAY NOT REFLECT ANY SUBTLE VARIATIONS IN COLOR. 116D 115 GeL MATERIAL OR CONSTRUCTION THAT MAY OCCUR DUE TO LOCAL MATERIAL DIFFERENCES AND FINAL DESIGN DETAILING. 01/19/2005 / I / r - ~ i BLACK TUBULAR STEEL FENCING WI BLACK VINYL COATED CHAINLlNK FABRIC _ _ _ E.LFS.("X4' SCORE PATTERN) o 5 20 40 (LOWE'S BLUE) I - - ---, . I [EXPOSED AGGREGATE PRECAST PANEL WI4' X 4' [ STD BLDG LIGHTING FIXTURES [FRONT PARAPET WALL [ R T.U 'S [GUTTERS & DOWNSPOUTS IMPRINT PATTERN (PTD. LOWE'S LT BEIGE) (OK BRONZE) (BEYOND) ~ IPTD "WHITE") (PTD LOWE'S LT. BEIGE) . , l' ~~~ 1 > _ _ 22 - 0 ~ ~ --:- :-::::: ~ ~_____ -f:::::...-- __ - - ~:::::_ - ~:::=:- -F:::. --_ I -~: :::_ ~ _ ___ _ ___ ~t.:: j " ". [)"... U. . < ~. ,i:' '. < iL~~il" [) In - '\ .. ~ bil .. "iJt==__ ~'4i'" ',~ , ~mcc"''''w~" r=", -~m' L~,_ooco,"'''^'' L.."'"oon"~""",,,~,_, o 5 20 40 60 REAR ELEVATION VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK FABRIC AND 100% OPAQUE (PTD. TO MATCH SIERRA RED) IPTD. TO MATCH SIERRA RED) PANEL WI BRICK IMPRINT PATTERN WI VERT. MTL DECKING GATES BLACK SCREENING FABRIC (SIERRA RED) (PTD. TO MATCH SIERRA RED) I - - - I . I II r PRE,FIN METAL ROOFING f PRE-FIN METAL COPING [E I F S (4'X4' SCORE PATTERN) EXPOSED AGGREGATE PRECAST PANEL WI 4' X 4' I. ' (SIERRA TAN) (SIERRA TAN) (LOWE'S LT. BEIGE) . IMPRINT PATTERN (PTD LOWE S LT BEIGE) 1 ~ '" L [ ""r8 -- - , '- -. -- .. ..---.. . ~ - .< - - - . . -, f I I I I t lf~ .. \_ _ ~ " .. ... _ _ _ RIGHT ELEVATION INTEGRAL COLOR PRECAST 16'- 0- H. BLACK TUBULAR STEEL FENCING WI BLACK VINYL COATED o 5 20 40 60 PANEL WI BRICK IMPRINT PATTERN (SIERRA RED) CHAIN LINK FABRIC AND 100% OPAQUE BLACK SCREENING FABRIC r- - - - - EXPOSED AGGREGATE PRECAST PANELl OVERHEAD DOOR f PRE-FIN METAL COPING [INTEGRAL COLOR PRECAST !I PRE-FIN METAL ROOFING W/4' X 4' IMPRINT PATTERN (PTD. (MANUFACTURER'S STD. WHITE) (SIERRA TAN) PANEL WI BRICK IMPRINT PATTERN (SIERRA RED) r--l (SIERRA TAN) LOWE'S LT BEIGE) . i ~ t TOC ~ ~ TOC , I 'l--t-L 29',0" 24',4- I..!.. t I - - - LEFT ELEVATION o 5 20 40 60 ~ REPRESENTATIONONLYdrD .-/-/~~--~ Shakopee MN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ,'-- . , BUILDING IMAGES SHOWN ARE A REPRESENTATION OF THE DESIGN : INTENT AND MAY NOT REFLECT ANY SUBTLE VARIATIONS IN COLOR. :'. g 116D 115 GC L MATERIAL OR CONSTRUCTION THAT MAY OCCUR DUE TO LOCAL : 01/19/'"' 005 MATERIAL DIFFERENCES AND FINAL DESIGN DETAILING . L. ~ __~~_____ .~__w,~_.____ ___