HomeMy WebLinkAbout4. Discussion: Special Election for the Issuance of General Obligation Bonds to Fund a Community Center Expansion
If,
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
MEMORANDUM "-
To: Mayor and City Council
Community Center Task Force
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
From: Mark Themig, Parks, Recreation, and Facilities Director
Meeting Date: March 22, 2005
Subject: Requested Community Center Expansion Feasibility Study
Information
INTRODUCTION
The Community Center expansion feasibility study was presented to City Council in a
work session with the Citizen Task Force and Parks and Recreation Advisory Board on
March 15. City Council requested additional information and set a follow-up workshop for
6:00 p.m., March 22.
DISCUSSION
City Council requested additional information related to costs associated with the
pr()posed expansion. The questions included:
. How would the projected annual. operating subsidy compare with the current subsidy
on the general fund levy?
. How will the proposed growth management policy impact the future reduction in per
household levy amounts?
. What is the total tax impact for the referendums that have been approved over the
past few years, plus the proposed Community Center expansion amount and a
possible future school referendum?
Mr. Voxland and Mr. Leek have helped me assemble the following responses to these
questions. The Task Force also met on March 17 and requested a comparison of
Shakopee's tax level compared to other communities analyzed in the feasibility study.
Annual Operating Subsidy
Buildinq Rental Charqe
In order to estimate the annual operating subsidy that an expansion would require, there
needs to be a discussion about the building rental charge. Following the proposed terms
for calculating the annual fee (30-year replacement period), the rental charge for the
proposed expansion would total $1 million annually.
In speaking with Mr. Vox/and, it appears that there wasn't a specific financial analysis
done in 1997 when the building fund was created. The fund was created to provide a
funding source for the construction and replacement of buildings. Over time, the purpose
of the building fund has evolved to provide for major maintenance items.
Annual fees for the building fund are based on the initial project cost, life expectancy, an
annual maintenance factor, and an inflation factor. The following are the amounts that
each building contributes to the building fund:
r
Buildin Annual Fee
180,910
Center 150,220
140,470
94,600
86,990
77,530
31 ,1 00
11 ,290
11 ,000
135,000
470,000
Total 449,110
1. City Council has decided to pay the annual bond payments from the
Building Fund in lieu of levying that amount. A decision to make the
bond payment from the Building Fund will need to be made on an
annual basis in order to cancel the levy for the subsequent year.
Annual Tax Impact
Councilor Helkamp asked for information on the subsidy impact. The amount of building
rental charge has a significant impact on the annual financial viability of the proposed
expansion, and the projected annual operating subsidy for an expanded community
center would depend on the decisions City Council makes regarding the building rental
charge. The following table outlines the subsidy for the Community Center, as well as
the entire Recreation Fund, which also includes recreation programs, the aquatic park,
park services, natural resources, and park development.
Annual Tax Avg Avg Avg
Subsidy House House House
2005 ExistinQ Expansion Total Chanfle Existinfl Expansion Total
Community
Center per BRS 399,773 (38,848) 360,925 -9.7% 27.36 (2.66) 24.70
Building Rent 150,000 850,000 1,000,000 10.27 58.18 68.44
549,773 811,152 1,360,925 37.63 55.52 93.15
Subsidy for
Remainder of
Recreation Fund 524,777 - 524,777 35.92 - 35.92
Total tax subsidy
with full building
rental 1,074,550 811 ,152 1,885,702 75.5% 73.55 55.52 129.06
Total tax subsidy
without building (38,848) (2.66)
rental 924,550 885,702 -4.2% 63.28 60.62
Growth Managen:-ent Implications
There were questions at the March 15 work session about how a proposed growth
management policy might impact increases in the total estimated market value, and
therefore, impact any reduction in the levy for a Community Center expansion over time.
For comparison, Mr. Voxland provided information on a property parcel that showed the
valuation nearly doubling, and the tax impact of the referendum decreasing by 55% due
to increases in the total estimated market value of the City:
Shakopee Fire Station Referendum Comparison - $3.4 million bond
Tax Year Total EMV Rate Property EMV Tax
1996/97 695,306,365 0.04245 $141,800 $60
1997/98 776,534,400 0.03237 $146,800 $48
1998/99 897,901,119 0.02909 $156,600 $46
1999/00 1,087,145,000 0.02497 $166,000 $41
2000/01 1,369,102,400 0.01980 $211,100 $42
2001/02 1,743,136,300 0.00764 $195,400 $15
2002/03 2,062,115,200 0.01189 $214,900 $30
2003/04 2,426,033,300 0.01189 $240,700 $29
2004/05 2,654,170,900 0.00969 $276,800 $27
City Council has discussed limiting residential growth to somewhere in the range of 500-
750 units per year. Using the same time period as above, the number of building permits
issued during these years were:
Year Residential Buildinq Total EMV of
Permits Issued1 Permits
1996 533 40,512,000
1997 548 39,121,000
1998 677 57,814,000
19992 916 121,255,000
2000 1,322 115,628,000
2001 1,191 123,252,000
2002 1,095 90,942,000
2003 1,580 154,010,000
2004 1 ,477 169,001,000
1. Includes all residential building permits (housing units, decks, etc.)
2. Development moratorium.
One factor that contributes to the increase in the total estimated market value for the city
is growth in commercial/industrial. Even if Council were to limit residential growth, there
would likely be some level of commercial/industrial development occurring in the city.
Michael Leek has helped prepare the following analysis of future commercial/industrial
growth opportunities:
Commercial Area A roximate Growth Quantit
Shakopee Crossings 40-50 acres east of CR 18
15 acres west of CR 18
Eastern Shako ee Commercial/Industrial Area 375 acres
Dean Lakes Development 1.4 million square feet of business park
U to 375,000 s uare feet of commercial
Areas Identified il1 the Scott County 2,258 acres commercial/industrial
Comprehensive Plan for Future Urban 995 acres commercial reserve
Expansion (see also March 2004 Shakopee 6,116 urban residential expansion
Com rehensive Plan U date
Referendum Amounts
The referendum amount included with your March 15 meeting packet was based on
beginning the levy in 2007. Councilor Menden requested information on other amounts.
The following analysis provides alternative options:
$25,940,000 in Project Costs. Lew Beqinninq in 2007
$ 4?',P$PiP(J(J
Residence
Total EMV 2005 Rate MV Tax Per Mo
$ 2,654,170,900 0.000847 $ 160,000 $ 135.55 11.30
187,000 158.42 13.20
213,000 180.45 15.04
277,000 234.67 19.56
513,000 434.60 36.22
590,000 499.84 41.65
$25,9401gQgi~~~()iect Costs. Lew Beqinninq in 2006
$" 4Q;$P(J;()(JP
Residence
Total EMV 2005 Rate MV Tax Per Mo
$ 2,654,170,900 0.000826 $ 160,000 $132.14 11.01
187,000 154.44 12.87
213,000 175.91 14.66
277,000 228.77 19.06
513,000 423.67 35.31
590,000 487.26 40.61
$25.00.0QQinPr()i~ct Costs, Lew Beqinninq in 2006
$ 4P;()(J0;PQP 95%
Residence
Total EMV 2005 Rate MV Tax Per Mo
$ 2,654,170,900 0.000784 $ 160,000 $ 125.37 10.45
187,000 146.53 12.21
213,000 166.90 13.91
. 277,000 217.05 18.09
513,000 401.97 33.50
590,000 462.30 38.52
$20,00.000 in Proiect Costs. Lew Beqinninq in 2006
$ 4(),(JOO;()(J()\ 76%
Residence
Total EMV 2005 Rate MV Tax Per Mo
$ 2,654,170,900 0.000627 $ 160,000 $ 100.30 8.36
187,000 117.22 9.77
213,000 133.52 11.13
277,000 173.64 14.47
513,000 321.57 26.80
590,000 369.84 30.82
Total Tax Impact
Councilor Lehman requested an analysis of total tax impacts. Various actions have
impacted the total property tax. The following is an analysis to show the impact of the
recently passed high school referendum, a future elementary school referendum, and
the proposed Community Center referendum.
2006 2005 2007 2007
Proposed
Community
Residence Center Tax HS - 47 HS - $18 New Elem
MV Tax Capacitv 0.059229 0.02268345 0.042201 Total
160,000 132.14 1,600 94.77 36.29 67.52 266
187,000 1 54.44 1,870 110.76 42.42 78.92 311
213,000 175.91 2,130 126.16 48.32 89.89 354
277,000 228.77 2,770 164.06 62.83 116.90 461
513,000 423.67 5,163 305.80 117.11 217.88 859
590,000 487.26 6,125 362.78 138.94 258.48 1,019
Tax Comparison of Other Cities with Community Centers
The Task Force requested information on how Shakopee compares with other cities that
have Community Centers. The following is information from the 2004 Citizens League
report, the most recent available.
City Average Tax Metro Area $195,000 Metro Area
Home Ranking EMV Tax Ranking
Value
Chaska $209,342 2,489 39 $2,293 37
Eden Prairie 283,440 3,301 13 2,155 54
Eagan 212,303 2,082 64 1,882 85
Inver Grove 202,100 1,891 77 1,812 91
Heights
Maple Grove 216,570 2,632 34 2,332 34
Maplewood 173,940 2,145 60 2,449 18
Shoreview 205,311 2,348 44 2,212 46
Shako pee 185,473 1,184 84 1,927 82
Source: Citizens League 2004 Report
REQUESTED ACTION
We have attempted to provide the information that was requested at the March 15 City
Council meeting in order to facility discussion among the City Council, Task Force, and
Advisory Board. Possible discussion items include the following:
. Proposed Expansion Components
. Construction Cost Estimates
. Financial Operations Analysis
. Building Rental Charge
. Determining whether or not to call for a special election. If so:
~ When to have the election?
~ What amount?
~ How does that impact the project and referendum costs?
~ Do you want to authori:z:e th~ 3-D video work?
If you desire to move forward with a special election, we have included a draft of the
resolution that would set the special election. This resolution can be amended as
necessary.
RESOLUTION NO, 6207
RESOLUTION DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS AND
CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION THEREON
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "City Council") of Shako pee, Scott County,
Minnesota (the "City") as follows:
1. The City Council hereby finds and determines:
a) That it is in the best interest of the health, welfare, and safety of the City and its
residents that the City construct and equip improvements to and the expansion of its
community center, including the addition of meeting rooms, an expanded fitness and
weight-training area, an activity center for seniors, a leisure pool, additional space for
aerobics and other fitness classes, a cafe and lounge, a multi-use turf field that converts
to an ice sheet during hockey and skating season, locker rooms, expanded walking
track, and a multi-use community room (the "Project");
b) That the City is authorized by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475
(the "Act") to issue its obligations to finance the Project in whole or in part and to pledge its
full faith, credit and taxing powers to the payment of such obligations; and
c) That it is necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of the affairs
of the City that the Project be financed in whole or in part by the issuance and sale of the
City's general obligation bonds pursuant to the Act in an amount not to exceed $
2. The proposition for the issuance of the bonds will be submitted to the voters of the
City at a special election to be held as part of the special election on Tuesday, May 24,2005. The
election will be held and conducted in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota relating
to special municipal elections.
3. The City Clerk is directed to cause a sample ballot in substantially the form shown
in SectioIl 5 and a notice of election in substantially the form attached as Exhibit A, to be posted,
published, and delivered as required by law as follows:
(a) The notice of election will be published once in the official newspaper of the City at
least two weeks prior to the election;
(b) The notice of election and a sample ballot will be posted in the office of the City
Clerk at least four days prior to the election;
(c) The sample ballot will be published in the official newspaper at least one week prior
. to the election; and
SH155-161(JAE)
259971v.l
(d) The notice of election will be delivered to the Scott County Auditor at least 53 days
prior to the election, together with a written request to notify the Secretary of State of the
election at least 46 days prior to the election pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
205.16, Subdivision 5.
4. The polling places, hours of election, and the respective judges for the election will
be those established by the City for special elections. The polls will be open from 7:00 a.m. until
8:00 p.m.
5. (a) The City Clerk is authorized and directed to prepare the ballot in substantially
the following form, subject to the terms of Section 5(b) hereof:
SH155-161(JAE)
259971 v.l
CITY QUESTION BALLOT
SPECIAL ELECTION
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS: To vote for a question, completely fill in the oval next to the
word "YES" for that question. To vote against a question, completely fill in the oval next to the
word ''NO'' for that question.
CITY QUESTION NO. 1:
ISSUANCE OF BONDS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF CITY'S CUMMUNITY CENTER.
Shall the City of Shakopee be authorized to issue its general obligation bonds in an
amount not to exceed $ to provide funds for constructing and
equipping improvements to and expansion of its community center?
C) YES
0 NO
The amount of taxes that would be raised in the first year of the property tax levy to pay the
principal and interest on the bonds is estimated to be approximately $ . The
maximum amount of taxes that would be raised in any subsequent year for the purpose is estimated
to be approximately $ . This maximum increase in property tax levy is estimated
to be.approxirnately _% of the taxable market value of property in the City.
BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A
PROPERTY TAX INCREASE,
SH155-161(JAE)
259971v.l
(b) The City Clerk is authorized and directed to prepare ballots pursuant to the
requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 206.61. The City Clerk will provide each polling
place with at least two sample ballots which are facsimiles of the card to be voted on in that
precinct to be posted at the polling place, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 206.62,
6. The City Council shall meet in the City Hall on Thursday, May 26, 2005, at
7:00 p.m., C.T. to canvass the results ofthe election and to declare the results thereof.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota on this 22nd day of March, 2005.
Mayor
City Clerk
SH155-161(JAE)
259971 v.l
EXHIBIT A
NOTICE OF SPECIAL ELECTION
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GWEN that a special election will be held in and for the City of
Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota, on Tuesday, the 24th day of May, 2005, at which the
following proposition will be submitted to the voters ofthe City for their approval or rejection:
CITY QUESTION NO.1:
ISSUANCE OF BONDS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF CITY'S COl\t1MUNITY CENTER.
Shall the City of Shakopee be authorized to issue its general obligation bonds in an
amount not to exceed $27,030,000 to provide funds for constructing and equipping
improvements to and expansion of its community center?
YES
NO
The polling places for said election are as follows:
Shakopee P-1 Valley View Baptist Church 1980 West 10th Avenue
Shakopee P-2 Shakopee Public Library 235 Lewis Street South
Shakopee P-3 Central Family Center 132 East 5th Avenue
Shakopee P-4 Fire Station 2788 Vierling Drive East
Shakopee P-5 Sweeney Elementary School 1001 Adams Street
Shakopee P-6 Community Center 1255 Fuller Street
Shakopee P-7 Faith Lutheran Church 150 West 130th Street (CR 78 and CR 79
Shakopee P.8 Calvary United Methodist Church 2488 Vierling Drive East
Shakopee P-9 Cross of Peace Lutheran 1506 E. Wood Duck Trail
Shakopee P.lO Red Oak Elementary School 7700 Old Carriage Court
Shakopee P-11 Shakopee Area Catholic Education 2700 17th Avenue East
Center
Shakopee P-12 Presbyterian Church 909 South Marschall Road
The polls for said election will be open at 7:00 a.m. and will remain open until closing at
8:00 p.m.
Any qualified registered voter of the City is entitled to vote at said election, and any resident
of the City not previously registered as a voter may register on election day.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Judith S. Cox
City Clerk
Dated: , 2005.
SHl55-161 (JAE)
259971 v.1
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF SCOTT ) SS.
)
CITY OF SHAKOPEE )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Shakopee, Scott
County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing
extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on March 22, 2005
with the original thereof on file in my office and the same is a full, true, and correct copy thereof,
insofar as the same relates to the calling of a special bond election for the issuance and sale of
$27,030,000 General Obligation Bonds of the City.
WITNESS My hand as such City Clerk and the corporate seal ofthe City this _ day of
,2005.
City Clerk
City of Shakopee, Minnesota
(SEAL)
SH155-161(JAE)
259971v.l
J
~{~~~ ~
~
'::''';I.:~,:."...... .......... .'.'. '.....~..........."'. Background
" '~ . .i, . ......
· 2003 Resident Survey
- City conducted resident survey in 2003 on parks and
'. . . .. ... .! City Qf $"akol'~e r~~reation services .
~ j proPtJ'SedComo/lJnifyCentetExpansion - CItIzen Task Force desIgned the survey
~~ i Marcfr22; 2QO!;"- <:;ityCouncil Work Session - Trails, parks, and community center enhancements
SI-JAKOPEE ~ ranked high in the survey
C<JM'MtJNtrYPRiDilSlNdll.851 1 - Trails and parks are being addressed through
. .... ..... .. ~ comprehensive plan update
~ - City Council created the Community Center Citizen
! Task Force to analyze options for the future of the
, ,- 'q' ,..1;iij Ii -~~~:",~":;". ~h", ..,... I' ~ .~4:fk;z Community Center
{H'l ~~ i?',--;~C',..,$'~"Xl'ci;j;,J': "",- !jf~~,'" ";I'{ ." ~"~'li;;:.
-_.' -\~ rP>. ~-,;:;''''".-<--;::->'''''~~' . "Jiji""it~1j:< ~ I ~ ,~~~.
""." .~ '" '"; . . , ,i",,:B;ir~:.::,..,.t;;;;, - .. .:,,: - 'i\:'l.~ . .:w-::;-'.....'
ft;> l' ., ~'-"""'>"";;':::'"~~~~'~I"....<<-\4..!~ ~.'~~m' ^~
. ;~,. ' , ~ I ~ ~ ~:l3.i:'{_" -- f '$~~';:\ '''''If.''''
I :;;~ /1:"l j l! ~"~~t~I "i< ,~ ;;u ~~~:: ~P} r::f~ ~~~ ~ Shako nsfon Good Health Good FrIends GreatComm
~ ~~""__~<_,.. ""~ "'~ "~M!Ji1 ~'1fi~ ~ .~ "'^""'"
Background Background
· 2004 Citizen Task Force Options: . Fall of 2004, City Council asked for
- Close the Facility additional work by the Citizen Task
- Privatize the Facility Force
_ Expand throughPublic/PrivatePartnership · Authorized a Feasibility Study
_ No Changes · Selected consultant team comprised of
_ Expand through Public Financing Barker Rinker Seacat, Baliard*King, and
Bonestroo Sports
. Task Force recommended expansion · ~pproxim~te:ly 40 residents participated
through public financing. In the feasIbility study
~ Shako nsTon Good Health Good Fri Great CORm"" ~ Shako nsion
~ ~
1
A
Feasibility Study Findings Feasibility Study Findings
. Market can support the proposed expansion.
. Components proposed from resident survey · Repairs to Existing Facility
and task force work - Water Infiltration
- Leisure Pool (warm water) with aquatic support - Ught Levels
areas
- Fitness Area: cardio and strength training - Energy Efficiency in Arena
- Aerobics Dance! Spinning Areas
- Dedicated Senior Center w! kitchen & meeting · Task Force Recommendation
rooms
- Indoor Playground for children - $25.9 million project
- Cafe, snack area and birthday party rooms - $26.35 million bond
- Short-term child care - May 24 Special Election
- Multi-Use Turf Facility! Second Ice Sheet
~ Shakooee Communltv Center EJaJanslon Good Health Good Friends Great CommrmlM ~ Shako Good Health Good Friends. Great Comm
~
Con~eptyal Site Plan Final Concept Plan
,..-----.
I Futu",
i ~
~----- L_' eJJI9
Lobby
0 Bolow
o ......~
IGymllQllcI
!~ Wt5& Wb & Fitness
I Fitness
: Belo... ..,-
r----- ExlsUng
, .- Gym
, ...
L__~=_, ..-
IBlInqlMl
, ....
t::.
Upper Lovel Plan
~ Shako GoOd Health. Good ~ Shako Good Health Good Friend Great Commun
,
2
'-"';;~
...
,~
(..:.
.
Final Concept Plan Concept Design Perspective Option
""!;II Shalro Good Heaflh Good Friend Great Comm ~ Shako nsian Good Health Good Frl
~ ~
Concept Design Perspective Option Concept Design Perspective Option
_Shak nslan _ Shako Center Ex nslon
~ ~
3
Program & Budget Summary Financial Operations Analysis
Expenditure - Revenue Comparison
Total of New and Renovated SpaCe (170,076 SF) $19,711,000 Proiection Expansion Existina Ctr. Total Buildina
Site DevEllopl'l1ent Costs . $1,014,000 Expenditures $2,099,152 $791,423 $2,890,575
Fixtures; Furnishings and Equipment (FF&E) $1,277,000 Revenue Projections $2,138,000 $391,650 $2,529,650
Desian and Construction AdministratiOn $1.865.250 DifferenCe $38,848 ($399,773) ($360,925)
Sub-total Project Costs $23,867,250 Recovery Percentage 101% 49% 87%
Add 10% Continaencv $2.072.500 Proiection Expansion Existina Ctr. Total Building
Total Project Cost $25,939,750 Building Rental $850,000 $150,000 $1,000,000
Total Expenditures $2,949,152 $941,423 $3,890,575
. Based on actual past project costs Revenue Projections $2,138,000 $391,650 $2,529,650
. Factors regional and inflation costs for 2006 Bid Difference ($811,152) ($549,773) ($1,360,925)
. Includes 10% contingency Recovery PerCentage 72% 41% 65%
""!;lI She" Good Good Fri Great Common ""!;lI Sheko~ Communltv Center Exoanslon Good Health Good Friends Great CommUl1ltvl
~ ~ .
Financial Operations Analysis Financial Operations Analysis
Significant Employment Opportunities 5-Year Revenue-Expense Comparison (no building rental fee) for Total Building
Staffina levels Exoansion Existina Staff Total Blda.
FTE (full-time equivalent) 9.25 4.95 14.2
Part-time (FTE) 46.5
Full-time $306,073 $895,690
Part-time $160.426 $1.024.213
Total $466,499 $1,919,903
~i_
.
on.
""!;lI She" nsfon Good Healfh Good Frfen<ts Gteal
~
~
4
0
Q
c'
"
.
Financial Operations Analysis Financial Operations Analysis
Comparison with other Community Centers
~ Shako ~Shak
~ ~
Financial Operations Analysis Referendum
Fees
Community Center Referendum $26.35 million levy
Household Cost
Residence MV TaxlYr. = Taxi Mo.
$160,000 $132.14 = $11.01
$187,000 $154.44 = $12.87
Average Value $213,000 $175.91 = $14.66
$277,000 $228.77 = $19.06
$513,000 $423.67 = $35.31
$590,000 $487.26 = $40.61
~ Shako nslon Good Health Good Friends Great Comm ~ Shako nsian Good Health Good Frlen Great CotmJun
~
5
Referendum Household Cost
Referendum + Subsidy
Shakopee Fire Station Referendum Comparison
$3.4 million bond
Tax Year Rate EMV Tax # Permits
1996/97 0.04245 $141,800 $60 430
1997/98 0.03237 $146,800 $48 381
1998/99 0.02909 $156,600 $46 603
1999/00 0.02497 $166,000 $41 1,105
2000/01 0.01980 $211,100 $42 773
2001/02 0.00764 $195,400 $15 788
2002103 0.01189 $214,900 $30 588
2003/04 0.01189 $240,700 $29 1,069
2004/05 0.00969 $276,800 $27 778
~ ShaM Commun Good Health Good ~ Shako nsion Good Health Good Friends Great Commun
~
Household Cost Household Cost
Proposed Expansion + Future Projects Comparison of Other Cities
~ Shako""'" CommunHv CenIer "~nslon Good Health Good FrIends. Great CommunlM ~ Shako...... Commun"" Center "'~nslon Good Health Good Friends Great Conwnunilvl
""!""" ~
"
6
::1 0
'"
c; c
.
.
Task Force
· Spokespersons
- Arvid Sornberger
- Ion Theis
~Sha Good Health Good Frien
~
7