HomeMy WebLinkAbout15.B.2. Final Plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition-Res. No. 6187
CITY OF SHAKOPEE IS.G. ~.
Memorandum
CASELOG NO.: 05-022 COi~SENT
I
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Mark Noble, Planner I
SUBJECT: Final Plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition
MEETING DATE: April 19, 2005
REVIEW PERIOD: December 24, 2004 to Apri122, 2005
INTRODUCTION:
Centex Homes has submitted an application for final plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition, located
north of Crossings Boulevard, and west ofthe 3rd Addition and future commercial development
along CSAH 18. This property is presently legally described as Outlot C, Riverside Fields 3rd
Addition, and has an area of 15.17 acres, and would consist ofthree (3) streets with 74 single-family
residential lots. This item was tabled most recently at the March 15,2005 meeting to allow staff and
the applicant additional time to review design issues.
CONSIDERATIONS:
Since Council's last review of this project, the applicant has resubmitted plans that are generally
consistent with the approved preliminary plat. They have proposed Switchgrass Circle to be
constructed as a cul-de-sac (750 foot max. length, consistent with City Code requirements), rather
than as a street that loops back to Crossings Boulevard along the commercial development proposed
adjacent to County Road 18. At the February 3,2005 Planning Commission meeting, the
Commission reviewed a PUD Concept Plan for that commercial development, recommending that
the commercial and residential projects develop without a street connection (they did support
constructing an emergency access connection between the developments).
Tom Pitschneider, City Fire Inspector, has commented that Riverside Fields 4th will still need to
provide a temporary emergency vehicle access road for the entire Riverside Fields development.
Conditions of approval are as follows: 1) provide an emergency fire apparatus access road from
Switchgrass Circle to Southbridge Parkway; 2) the access shall be constructed with a Class 5 surface
with a minimum driving width of 12 feet; 3) the access road shall include the installation of
barricade devices that are approved by the City of Shakopee; and 4) appropriate easement
agreements shall be recorded prior to recording the final plat. He has also noted that if the plat is
approved, the design, installation, maintenance and easement agreements of this emergency access
road shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Inspector. The developer has submitted a plan
which shows the design and specifications of the proposed access road. Mr. Pitschneider also
commented that a maximum of 100 units in this development may be constructed without an
approved second access for emergency use.
Joe Swentek, Project Engineer, has provided a memorandum.recommending approval ofthe final
plat, noting a number of conditions that shall be addressed prior to recording and construction. The
recommended conditions have been incorporated into the draft resolution.
Planning staff commented that the City's sewer plan contemplates that the adjacent "Riverside
Bluffs" area (the property just west of Riverside Fields 4th Addition) would be served by sanitary
sewer extended from the Prior Lake Interceptor to the west, through the former Eagle Creek Stables
property, and then to the south to serve the areas on the south side of CR 16. In the event that the
Council chooses to allow Riverside Bluffs to be served by a connection to Riverside Fields, it
should be conditioned on 1) the developer being responsible for all costs of installation,
maintenance, and future removal of the connection, and 2) a clear understanding that service to the
south will only become available once the Prior Lake Interceptor connection is made.
Bruce Loney, Public Works Director, provided a memorandum'that addresses the sanitary sewer
issue, noting that Engineering staffis recommending that the extension of temporary sewer be
denied since the permanent sewer may be available in a year or two. Mr. Loney noted in his
memorandum the number ofissues that need to be resolved prior to approval ofthe Riverside Bluffs
plat. lfthe Council were to approve the temporary sewer extension, it should be contingent on
compliance with the conditions outlined in Mr. Loney's memorandum.
Planning staff notes that the applicant ispresently discussing the sanitary sewer service connection
issue with the proposed developer of Riverside Bluffs. There currently is not a provision for this
connection to occur in Riverside Fields, and at this time there is not a final resolution to this issue
between the developers; however, staff has determined that this is not a reason to deny the Riverside
Fields 4th Addition Final Plat request.
Chris Enger, Ryland Homes, has submitted a letter addressing the proposed sewer connection,
requesting that the sewer connection be left in the approved plans for Riverside Fields 4th Addition,
with several reasons supporting the request. Mark Themig, Parks, Recreation, and Facilities
Director, provided a memorandum that addresses an incorrect statement in Mr. Enger's letter.
Additionally, it should be noted that the Planning Commission did review the Riverside Bluffs
Preliminary Plat at their March 3rd and April 7th meetings, but that they continued the public hearing
to the April 21, 2005 meeting, citing the need for comments to be received from City Engineering,
Scott County Public Works, and other reviewing agencies.
The Building Official commented that temporary street signs are required prior to construction.
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission provided a memorandum noting that water, underground
electric and street lighting installation is available subject to their standard terms and conditions.
The applicant must pay the associated fees, and contact them regarding installation/construction
policies. Additionally, they noted that Rye Court and Switchgrass Court watermains will have to be
connected for looping purposes, and that Switchgrass Circle's watermain will have to be extended
through Outlot B (commercial area) of Riverside Fields 3rd Addition to County Road I8's
watermain also for looping purposes.
The landscape plan approved with the preliminary plat proposed the planting of 468 trees for the
Riverside Fields development, with 306 required for mitigation. The submitted landscape plan
identifies the planting of288 trees north of Crossings Boulevard, and appears to be generally
consistent with the plan previously approved. Parks and Recreation recommended approval of the
plat, conditioned on the applicant modifying the tree replacement plan for the Red Oak trees
planned along Rye Court. Two (2) options were offered that the applicant should explore to ensure
compliance with this requirement.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve Resolution No. 6187, a resolution approving the final plat of Riverside Fields 4th
Addition, subject to the conditions as proposed.
2. Approve Resolution No. 6187, a resolution approving the final plat of Riverside Fields 4th
Addition, subject to revised conditions.
3. Deny the final plat of Riverside Fields 4th Addition.
4. Table a decision in order to allow time for the applicant and/or staffto provide additional
information.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer a motion to approve Resolution No. 6187, a resolution approving the final plat of Riverside
Fields 4th Addition, subject to the conditions as proposed. k
~ /
Planner I
RESOLUTION NO. 6187
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT
OF RIVERSIDE FIELDS FOURTH ADDITION
WHEREAS, Centex Homes, applicant and property owner, has made application for Final Plat
approval ofRNERSIDE FIELDS FOURTH ADDITION; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as follows:
Outlot C, RIVERSIDE FIELDS THIRD ADDITION;
WHEREAS, the Shakopee Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the
Preliminary Plat on August 7,2003; and
WHEREAS, all required public notices regarding the public hearing were duly sent and posted and all
persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee reviewed and approved the Preliminary Plat of
Riverside Fields on August 19,2003; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee reviewed the Final Plat of Riverside Fields
Fourth Addition on April 19, 2005; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, as follows:
That the Final Plat ofRNERSIDE FIELDS FOURTH ADDITION is approved subject to the following
conditions:
I. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the final plat:
A. Approval of title by the City Attorney.
B. Execution of a Developers Agreement which shall include provisions for security for public
improvements within the Final Plat, payment of engineering review fees, and any other fees
as required by the City's most current fee schedule.
1. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission.
2. Electrical system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
3. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission.
4. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City Engineer and the
Shakopee Public Utility Commission (SPUC) approve the Final Construction Plans
and Specifications.
5. Payment of Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges shall be made as required by the most
current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
6. Payment of Trunk Storm Water Charges and Trunk Storm Water Storage and
Treatment Charges shall be made as required by the most current City of Shakopee
Fee Schedule.
7. The extension of sanitary sewer to temporarily serve the property generally
located to the West of Riverside Fields shall require City Council approval.
C. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They shall
include, but not be limited to, the following:
1. Provide a total of seventeen (17) feet of drainage and utility easement in the rear of
Lot 5 of Block 1.
2. Simultaneous to the recording of the plat, a deed restriction shall be recorded on lots
as designated by the City.
The Deed Restriction shall appear as the following:
This conveyance is made conditioned upon and subject to the following
restriction. The Grantee, heirs, successors and assigns, are restricted from
erecting any fence or other structure within the utility and drainage easements
dedicated by plat over the above-described property, except with the prior
written consent of the City of Shakopee. This restriction shall run in favor of
and be enforceable by the City of Shako pee.
D. The following variations are granted from the zoning code provisions:
1. 15 foot structure separations are approved for all lots, with no side yard setback
being less than 5 feet.
2. 50 foot lot width minimum requirement for all lots.
E. The applicant shall implement the use of Best Management Practices for erosion control and
stormwater management during construction.
F. The applicant shall verify that all items set forth by Todd Hubmer ofWSB & Associates,
Inc. in his letter dated September 16,2004 (Exhibit 1) have been adequately addressed.
II. Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following conditions shall apply:
A. This development shall comply with City Code Section 10.60, concerning noise elimination
and noise prevention. Responsibility for other noise mitigation measures that may be
required in the future shall rest with the developer and/or its assigns.
B. Building construction, sewer, water service, fire protection and access will be reviewed for
code compliance at the time of building permit application(s).
C. The applicant shall design and provide an emergency fire apparatus access road (including
installation, maintenance and easement agreements) from the end of Switch grass Circle to
Southbridge Parkway.
D. The access shall be constructed with a Class 5 surface with a minimum driving width of 12
feet.
E. The access road shall include the installation of barricade devices that are approved by the
City of Shakopee.
F. Appropriate easement agreements shall be recorded prior to recording the final plat.
G. Provide a second remote access (including easements) in accordance with International Fire
Code Appendix D when the total count of lots accessing Crossings Boulevard west of
County Road 18 exceeds 100 units.
H. Watermains to be installed in this development shall provide the necessary looping
connections, as required by Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
1. All existing easements are retained.
J. Final grading, utility connections and access to city streets will need approval by the
Engineering Department.
K. All outstanding fees will apply.
L. Temporary street signs are required prior to construction.
M. Landscaping shall be cansistent with the submitted landscape plan, except that the applicant
shall madify the tree replacement plan far the Red Oak trees planned alang Rye Caurt,
either by staggering the species alang the cul-de-sac to' avoid having adjacent Red Oaks or
by replacing the Red Oaks with anather species such as Iranwaod, Blue Beech, Black Ash,
Burr Oak ar Swamp White Oak.
N. The applicant shau1d transplant healthy yaung trees an site whenever passible.
O. The developer shall install rain sensars far the irrigatian system, and that all sprinklers
awned and aperated by the Hameawner's Associatian shall have rain sensars cansistent
with State Law requirements.
P. The applicant shall canstruct houses using canstructian materials and methads far indaar
naise mitigatian.
Q. The applicant shall include 6 inches af tapsail, meeting MNDOT specificatians, an the
entire site.
R. Property addresses will not be released until the approved final plat is recorded with Scott
County Land Recards.
S. Pravide e1ectranic AutoCAD files af the Final Plat to' the Engineering Department.
T. Submit two' (2) capies afthe final plat (11" x 17"), and an electranic capy, to' the
Cammunity Develapment Department, as fallaws:
a. The final plat capies shall be labeled 'final' and include the Council hearing approval
date.
b. Submit paper copies to': Cammunity Develapment Department, 129 Holmes Street
South,Shakapee,1f.N 55379.
c. Send electronic capy (.dwg ar .shp) to' RecordedPlat@ci.shakopee.mn.us.
THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that appraval afthe Final Plat of RIVERSIDE
FIELDS FOURTH ADDITION daes not constitute a representatian or guarantee by the City af Shakapee as
to' the amount, sufficiency ar level af water service that will be available to' lats within the plat as they are
develaped.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
held the _ day of , 2005.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
.
. =-== _.j.~(~L- ~~~ / ~ , . ~ .
g [_Nml~ ' -mq -: 'I '/ \ ~I1f _ ~ UI ,:.
~ -; b>J R1B' RHt&1i'11 I I - -
gf~~.;;. = 'I ~E8f!gJ= ~- U-l! /.1,-
~~~ ". 8i ' I ~.=:IJ..I1. 11 ~.'
. . , .71: _ ODl'J'tl.., ~ !]"ld: I ~ ~""
~1Wj 'TITI~"^ - I, ~ -
II"~ 1(;(1\ jl D";~ ~Or" Y!:~~'-~' A ~s..~
,t (.. 'Y,\W) ~- 'e,..,p. '. ~.t}j... : "" :;" -
~ t K ~~\[~~w~;rit\~$':' r~ .:i ~1 I1
:c'~ ~ <>.~~ ~,~. Il"- 11
. ~ _~ rIA ~ 1\~1 }.:!:"-.
11 1[1 1(11 ". ~Be \~L >-.
G......... O$lM '11 '0.--..... -
"~~ ,.. J, l _ .~: ~ /i[::, ---
1. 'tH- ... p~ I. · """ ,'Ip. r- .,L~
~ 1 L RIB i(G /.'1l1TI'.,i7\'-" '" y "~,' -I. t{t!:J~' .
~--~ ~a I . ''\~ ~~(
- ... l' I iRR InT,-VJ._
:.ii j '- I J:U: ,.~.. -- .)-
AG ;:... l[J:~~fJ~{V::::-= ~ - - r ~ ~
=1~'I:l JarJ , ~m~/
~ f~
PV" . '" -..-. ~v
.- . " ' .G' ot--
.. - AG . ' ~-
-@ ~\ D~,,;. .fc;; '<<s.'4~
AG .: j: I-?~~~I l/li 1\ / I /~rt
~ ,Jb.. ~ Subject Property
SHAKOPEE \V~WE .....,. ShakopeeBoundaf)'
CCM""UNlTYt'RlDaSlNCU11~7 S U Zoning Boundary
, D Parcel Boundary
Final Plat Riverside Fields 4th
Addition
City of Shako pee
Memorandum
TO: Mark Noble, Planner I
FROM: Joe Swentek, Project Engineer
SUBJECT: Final Plat - Riverside Fields 4th Addition
PID NO.: 27-366066-1
CASE NO.: 05022
DATE: April 13, 2005
The application indicates a Final Plat request for a single-family residential development to be
located in Outlot C of the Riverside Fields 3rd Addition.
After reviewing the above referenced application, we have the following comments for the
applicant and the planning department:
General
1. Execution of a Developer's Agreement, which shall include provisions for security for
public improvements within the Final Plat and the engineering review fees.
2. Payment of Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges shall be made, as required by the most current
City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
3. Payment of Trunk Storm Water Charges and Trunk Storm Water Storage and Treatment
Charges shall be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
4. The extension of sanitary sewer to temporarily serve the property generally located to the
West of Riverside Fields shall require City Council approval.
5. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City Engineer and the Shakopee
Public Utility Commission (SPUC) approve the Final Construction Plans and
Specifications.
6. Provide electronic (Auto CAD) files ofthe Final Plat to the engineering department.
C:\Docurnents and Settings\MNoble\Local Settings\Ternporary Internet Files\OLK9\Final.Plat.Review.Riverside.FieldsAth.#2 - Revised
CDS,doc
Page 1 of2
Final Plat
1. The applicant shall work with City staff to provide emergency access from the end of
D\; (e Circle to Outlot B of Riverside Fields 3rd Addition.
"$Wlich:t"'s'S
2. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They shall
include, but not be limited to, the following:
. Provide a total of seventeen (17) feet of drainage and utility easement in the rear of
Lot 5 of Block 1.
3. Simultaneous to the recording of the plat, a deed restriction shall be recorded on lots as
designated by the City.
The Deed Restriction shall appear as the following:
This conveyance is made conditioned upon and subject to the following restriction. The
Grantee, heirs, successors and assigns, are restricted from erecting any fence or other
structure within the utility and drainage easements dedicated by plat over the above-
described property, except with the prior written consent of the City of Shakopee. This
restriction shall run in favor of and be enforceable by the City of Shakopee.
Storm Water Mana2:ement Plan
The applicant shall verify all items set forth by Todd Hubmer (WSB & Associates, Inc.) in his
letter dated September 16,2004 have been adequately addressed.
Recommendation
Engineering staff recommends approval subject to the comments listed above being addressed by
the applicant prior to recording ofthe Final Plat.
C:\Docurnents and Settings\MNoble\Local Settings\Ternporary Internet Files\OLK9\FinaI.Plat.Review.Riverside.FieldsAth,#2 - Revised
CDS.doc
Page 2 of2
.. t\G-W \ ~\T i
w..SB
~
& Associates, Illc. September 16, 2004
Mr. Joe Swentek
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street S.
Shakopee,MN 55379
Re: Riverside Fields 3rd Addition
Review of Grading Plan and Storm Sewer System
WSB Project No. 1281-76
Dear Mr. Swentek:
We have reviewed the construction drawings and grading plan for the above-referenced project.
In particular, we have reviewed the following plans related to this particular request:
. Grading Construction Plans for Riverside Fields 3rd Addition development - dated
08/20/04, received 08/24/04.
. Stormwater Management Plan, Riverside Fields 3rd Addition - dated 08/20/04, received
08/24/04.
Based on our review of the final plans and calculations, we offer the following detailed
comments related to this application:
1. Extend catch basin south on Rye Court to Station 3+50 to capture additional drainage
discharging from the south.
2. The site appears to discharge into a flood prone area as identified in the City stonnwater
management plan. Please reduce discharge from site to 0.1 cfs per acre for the 100-year
24-hour event. The hydrologic modeling infonnation for the project indicates that
under proposed conditions, 24 acres will discharge into proposed north pond and off site
to the northeast.
3. It is not clear from the information provided if wetlands are located on site. Please
identify any delineated wetlands on grading plan.
4. Confinn invert elevation of 24-inch RCP located in northwest portion of site. Previous
development plans in the vicinity identify invert elevation at 748.69. Please also
confirm that the ultimate outlet for this development will be incorporated into the Blue
4150 Olson Lake watershed stoml sewer trunk system discharging to the west.
Memorial Highway 5. Verify exfiltration rate used in hydrologic calculations for north pond.
Suite 300
Minneapolis 6. Identify conveyanceway direction, capacity and ponding location for areas draining to
Minnesota the south in the southeast comer of the proposed development.
55422
763.541.4800
7f'ii,541,1700 FAX Minneapolis' St. Cloud ' Equal Opportunity Employer F: \ WPWlNi I 281-76',09 / 504-bl,doc
Mr. Joe Swentek
September 16, 2004
Page 2
7. Widen emergency overflow located between Lots 33 and 34, Block 1, to 30 feet in
width to allow 1: 1.5 sideslopes on spillway into north pond.
8. Identify hydraulic parameters for emergency overflow overtopping Crossings
Boulevard at Station 18+50 and ultimately discharging into Proposed North Pond
through drainage swale located between Rye Court and Switchgrass Court.
9. Confirm cumulative off site area discharging to catch basins 404 and 501/503. The
detailed Micro drainage area map does not clearly identify all areas discharging to these
structures.
If you have any questions or items you wish to discuss, please contact me at (763) 287-7128.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, lltc.
~~
Todd Hubmer, P.E. /.<8-
Water Resource Engineer
cc: Bruce Loney, City of Shakopee
Doug Stah1- Pioneer Engineering
Jeff Weyandt, Pioneer Engineering
Phil Belfiori - WSB & Associates, Inc.
F:I WPW/NI/28/-76\09/504.bl.doc
-
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mark Noble, Planner I
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Approval of Riverside Fields 4th Addition Final Plat
DATE: March 11, 2005
This memorandum is in regards to the extension of temporary sanitary sewer .from
Riverside Fields 4th Addition to the proposed Riverside Bluffs plat. A request has been
made by Ryland Homes to extend sanitary sewer to Riverside Bluff proposed plat to
serve this site until the permanent sewer from the west can be installed. Attached is a
map showing the sanitary sewer service districts in this area.
Engineering staff has recommended that the extension of temporary sewer be denied
since the permanent sewer may be available in a year or two. A temporary sewer
extension can be provided with several conditions as follows:
. Developer of Riverside Bluffs pays for the sewer extension and escrows funds for
the future abandonment of the temporary sewer line.
. Developer acknowledges that the extension of sewer from Riverside Fields 4~h
Addition does not constitute any approval of any kind to Riverside Bluffs.
. Developer enters into an agreement with the city for the additional operation and
maintenance costs associated with the diversion of sewage to the Southbridge lift
station with the developers agreement of Riverside Bluff.
. Developer agrees that a connection. to the temporary sewer line cannot be done
until the spring of 2006 assuming a preliminary plat approval of Riverside Bluffs.
In my view, the proposed plat of Riverside Bluffs has several issues that need to be
resolved before approval. These issues include the following:
. CSAH 21 EIS
. Relocation and design of Prior Lake outlet channel
. Revised JP A between the City of Shakopee and Prior Lake-Spring Lake
Watershed District for cost sharing of improved channel
. Greenway corridor design in this area
. CSAH 16 roadway improvements for access to plat
. Revised wetland delineation in the spring of 2005
. Relocation of park from Riverside Fields
With the number of issues associated with this plat and others nearby sites, in my
opinion, this plat should not be approved until 2006 construction season. Also with the
amotmt of work in progress such as Countryside development and the new Public Works
building project and lots in inventory already, it would be difficult for staff to properly
review and inspect this development in 2005.
ill summary, staff did not recommend the temporary sanitary sewer line to Riverside
Bluffs proposed plat for orderly extension of utilities and for growth management. If
council wants to approve the temporary sanitary sewer line connection, it should be done
with conditions outlined in this memo.
~?tI
Public Works Drrector
BL/pmp
Riverside 4th addition
RYLAND
the Ryland Group, Inc.
March 1,2005 7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Controctor', Lie # 20035443
www.ryland.com
Mayor and City Council
Shakopee City Hall
129 South Holmes Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
Re: Riverside Fields 4th Addition, conditions of Final Plat
Honorable Mayor and City Council members:
Riverside Fields 4th Addition Final Plat approval is before you this eyening for your
approval. As part of the City Engineering staff comments on the plan, they have asked
that the sewer cOIll1ection from this property, in Crossings Blvd. to property further west
be eliminated. We respectfully request that the sewer connection be left in the approved
plans for Riverside 4th Addition for the following reasons:
1) The original City Resolution for Riverside Fields and the current Resolution
approving Riverside Fields 3rd Addition, require the connection.
2) Ryland Homes has an agreement with Mark Liesner,the property owner of the 46
acres west and adjacent to Riverside Fields, to develop the property as single
family.
a. Together with the property owner, we have been working with the City
staff since last September in preparation of plans for a single-family
neighborhood, in reliance upon this connection.
b. Prior to the first of the year the City Engineering staff indicated that if
there was sewer capacity for the Liesner property to be served temporarily
to the east, it could be done. However, more recently, City staffhas
indicated the City Council would make the determination whether the
Liesner property could be served temporarily through Riverside Fields.
3) We have met withCentex Homes, and they have no objection to leaving the
cOIll1ection in their plans.
4) The temporary connection supports the orderly and sequential single;.family
development oftbis area of the City, also supported by the logical extension of:
Crossings Blvd.; water mains; storm-water systems; park, trail, and open-space.
S) The Liesner property is in an area of the City identified by the City Council as
appropriate for current development.
6) The Liesners and Ryland Homes has been working with the PRAC and the EAC
and designed a preliminary plat that:
a. Conforms to all City Ordinances.
b. Proposes a single:-family neighborhood of high-value homes comistent
with City land-use wishes.
c. Provides park and trail systems consistent with City standards.
i. Ryland will dedicate additional developable easement area usable
for parks and trails as a part of the approved plat.
d. Completes a connection from existing Crossings Blvd. to County Road 16.
Ryland Homes has appeared before the EAC twice and the PRAB and will be at the
March 3 Planning Commission. We believe we have resolved all questions from the
EAC and the PRAB and we hope to be to the City Council in March or early April.
We ask that you leave the sewer connection in the Riverside Fields 4th Addition Final Plat
approval and allow the temporary service of the Liesner property through Riverside 4th
Addition.
sEnger Mark Liesner
Land Resources Manager Joel Liesner
Ryland Homes Twin Cities Division Eagle Creek Blvd.
Shakopee, MN
CITY OF SHAKO PEE
MEMORANDUM
To: Mark Noble, Planning
From: Mark Themig, Parks, Recreation, and Facilities Director
Date: March 7,2005
Subject: Clarification on Letter from Chris Enger, Ryland Homes on Riverside
Fields 4th Addition '
I wanted to comment on the letter that Chris Enger from Ryland Homes distributed at the
March 1 City Council meeting, and correct one of his statements.
In the second to last paragraph, Mr. Enger references the proposed Riverside Bluff
development and states that:
"Ryland Homes has appeared before the EAC and PRAB and will be at
the March 3 Planning Commission meeting. We believe we have resolved
all questions from the EAC and the PRAB and we hope to be to the City
Council in March or early April."
Ryland Homes presented their preliminary plat for Riverside Bluffs to the Environmental
Advisory Committee on February 9. The EAC tabled action due to unresolved questions
regarding the location of proposed greenway corridor. The EAC set a special workshop
to discuss greenway corridor criteria for March 2, at which time they developed various
considerations in identifying greenway corridors.
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board reviewed the Riverside Bluffs preliminary plat
at their February 28 meeting and also tabled action on the plat, pending additional input
from the EAC on potential greenway corridors, and how those corridors relate to park
needs.
Mr. Enger's statementthat all questions have been resolved is not true. The EAC is
scheduled to continue the discussion on March 9, and the PRAB will continue discussion
on March 28. Depending on the outcome of these meetings, there may be a
recommendation for the Planning Commission in time for their April 7 meeting.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
· .R E eEl \I E D APR 0 7 2005
k RIVE R SID E FIE L D S 4 TH ADD I TI 0 N KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Cent.. Hom... a Nevada general portnenhlp.
~i ~.Fl,.. - - T - - - - -l ~:::r.. ~~ ~ following described property lIluoted In tho County 01 Scott. Slot. of
I I CluUot e. RMRSIOE RELDS 3RD AOOlnON. oc:ccrdlng to the recorded plot thereof. Scott County.
.,~ .\ , ~ Minnesota.
...e. I,..t
I I Has causod tho sarno to be .......~ ...d plotted as RIVERSIDE RELDS 4TH ADDlnQN and _
Ym' "1" A I I hereby dedicote to the public fot pubnc use farever the Court. and C!rcIeo ond also dedicot.. the
r~r-~::~\~-+----- --1 easements 01 shown on thr. plot for drctlnCJO'l ond utmty purpog.es on)~
: : : In witness whereof aold CenteK Homes. a Nevada general partnership. hoa caused these presents
I '"'UI ,,' A I ....r;:"'..,.. I to be.ttlgned by Cent.. Real Estate CorporoUon. a Nevada corparatton, Its manoglng general
:::.. I ,..t ~'- I,..t portner this _ da)' of 20_
: : : BY: Cenlex RooI Estoto Corponrtlon
L _ _ _ _ _ -L _ _ _ _ _ .J _ Its: Managing Gooorol Portn...
r~ I B~
SECll0N 13, '!\\P. 115, RGE. 22 I ::-:: I f"\ Scott J. Rlcht.... OMolon ~t
~OO~ ~ I U
NO SCAlE
_ STAlE OF
....) COUNTY OF
'The foregoing instrument WOI acknowledged before me this _ do)' of
2D~ by Scott J. Rlcht.... OMolon ProoIdont, on behalf 01 Cent.. RooI E&loto
Corporation. a Newdo corporation. Its managing general portn.. of Centex Hames" 0 Nevada
gen...oI partnership.
Notary Public County,
My Cornmlnlon Explroa
63
I hereby certify thot I how surve~ ...d plotted tho property described on this plot os
RI\'EIlSlOE RELDS 4TH ADDInON, thot thl. plot Is a _ repr.....tation 01 th. _ !hot
- - - - - - - - - all distances ore correctly shown on the plat In feet and hundreclth. of 0 foot: that all
S89,?,OWE ;.:'=~ ::est;;:t=-~e:r ~:C::~th::~ :::,.~ c:.'::yb:es= ~o;:. In
plot; and that there ore no wetlands os defined In "'innesoto Statutes. Section 505.04 Subd.
1. or public hlghwo,. to be designated other than al shown.
64
John C. Lorson, Prol_oI lAnd Surw)'Ol'
"'lmesota Ucense No. 19828
STAlE OF lIINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
Th, foregoing SuMyor.. CertIficate was odcnowtedged before me thls _ day of
20 ~ by John C. Larson. Professlonaf Land Surveyor. MInnesota Ucen.. No. 19828
Notary PubIlc County, Minnesota
My Comm_ Explroa
o
~ CITY A TlORNEY. CITY OF SHAKOPEE. MINNESOTA
I hereby cortIIy thot I how """",lned this plot 01 RIVERSIDE FIELDS 4TH ADDInQN ond do
hereby recommend this plat for approval os to form thIs _ day of
2D~
8 CIty Attorney. Shokopee. Minnesota
"*' g
~ CITY COUNCIL. CITY OF SHAKOPEE. MINNESOTA
DO
10 this plot of RIVERSIDE FInDS 47H ADDfllON w.. opproYed and accepted by the City Councl
V of tho CIty of Shakopee. Minnesota. ot Q regular m"tlng thereof held this _
day of 20__ ond pursuont to ....5.A. 505.03.
sub. 2. we ore In conformance.
2 ~ ~
~ SCOtT COUNTY SURVEYOR
I
~ I Pursuont to ......nesoto Statutes. Olapter .389.09. SUbd. t. os amended,. thls plat hot been
... 17 r I r S89'50'37"W ._ed and _owd this day 01 2D ~
~ Ii! I 4 I~ 81D r\ By:
~ 0 I llil V' '
~ ~ on l!l~~'~~ _1~,~ J :..1... ~ Scott County Surveyor
;o!'l r I ~/~:;: SCOtT COUNTY AUDlTOR/TREASURER
~ g: 8 I 3 18 !2':::~ I hereby cortIIy that the current ond delinquent tox.. on tho lands deso1bed within .... paid and
~ b g I Ig , ~/J: the transfer Is entered thfa _ doy of 20_
~ ~ 1!!81.'5.!!:3.rt.. _ g,0:!!,0 J.:..L. - _ _ I
~ _ - I 60 30 D 60 SIgned by Deputy
,r I rS89'50'37"W _ ~ I
',_ l:! I 2 Iii! 8/ 22 ,/ SCOtT COUNTY RECORDER
~ lil I llil ' 476B ,-f I Scale in Feet
1!!81.'5.!!:JIIL _ g,O:!!'OJ 6-01'59'28"<-4 I I hereby certlfy that this plat ... filed In this olllce this _ dor 01
-J\ ~ 20 ~ at _ o.dock _ ... os Document No.
r I r S89'50';srW 11974--" t26.78 I "I
8 I 1 r-'8 30 30 I ' L~ S89'50';srW 128,4t '''0 I ."1
I '...) I lil ... ....,.. Scott County Recorder
lli tri.1 30 I 30 46 ql;t; 30 30 r
~71 \00 I ~I I Inl... I g
L_______J L_______~ z
120,90 30,00 30,00 119,33 30, 0 30,00 125,21 30,00 30,00 _ _ BEARINGS ARE BASED ON M:ST LINE OF THE NORTHM:ST
I N89"50'37-E 91526 OUARlER OF SEC, 13, nw>, 115. RGE, 22 WHICH IS ASSUMED
I . TO HAVE A BEARING OF SOO'09'23'E.
~ I '" " i:> ^ _ _ , " " ~ ^ ,., I ,..." ^ -) '"' '" DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
...:" J '" v I \ v.::.:: I " " ~ D v U L. C. v n r\ U '" EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: 0 DENOTES 'Ill INCH BY '4 INCH IRON MONUMENT
~~""'S.. I I SET AND ARKED BY LICENSE NUMBER 19828,
"g F- - - - - - - - - - - - 5-1 . DENOlES FOUNO IRON MONUMENT,
z I Wl/4COR,SECI3 T j 60 I j 60 I II
I TWP, 115, RGE.:22 . NO MONUMENT SYMBOl SHOWN AT ANY STATUlE
, J,. ,- (FHO SCOTT CO, C,I.M,) . (() (() e I 1--51 e REOUIRED LOCAnON, INDICAlES A PLAT
\ ,/' (,') (,') L J MONUMENT THAT Will. BE SET ACCORDING TO
<( <( _____ ___..J L_____ ___ MINNESOTA STATUTES AND WHICH SHAll. BE IN
" I C)I\ lr-e)~II""'\. .1.1 1""'\::-", I I ~ I'" PLACE WITHIN ONE. YEAR OF THE FJUNG or THE
I I I \1 V '-I \...)ll.Ic.. .- IL...L.U""'" eH\ IC""C:>C::II""'\C"" 9~ hd C"IC"I r"'\~ ')1\'1""\ I IL ~d I ^ ......"ITIA...I PLAT. SAID MONUMENTS SHALL BE 1/2 INCH X
~ J I \1 V LI '_ItJL ....'" 4~ I IL-L.LI..,) "-I ~LI C) c::~ "LILli I lvl... . 14 INCH IRON MONUMENTS MARKED BY UCENSE
:;;~"S... ~ST ADDIT:G~~ :::: <( :::: <( BEING 5 FEET IN W1DlH, AND ADJOINING SIDE NUMBER 19828,
gill r () --' () --' LOT LINES UNLESS OlHERWlSE INDICATED. AND
l!lg . I I t: I I ~- I 10 FEET IN W1DlH AND ADJOINING SlREET
lJ) : :: : > LINES AND REAR LOT LINES UNLESS OlHERWlSE
\~__"~:~~.S~&'b e;) e:l INDICATED ON lHE PLAT. r!.!~~~~~~2!
~
; RIVERSIDE FIELDS 4TH ADDITION HErEI WED APR o '( 2aos
- - -
AREA SKETCH
AREA SUMMARY
TOTAL LOT AREA = 12.4337 acres
TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY AREA = 2.7335 acres
TOTAL AREA = 15.1672 acres
61
12,413 sq.fL
64
13.740 aq,fL
36
7.518 sq.fL
13
10.009 oq.fL
I-
~
0
14 ()
7 9.112 sq.fL l8
6.244 sq.fL ~
6 13
6.059 aq,fL 15 is
7.686 sq.fL f;;;;.
~
CI)
5 16
6,045 sq.fL
7.192 sq.fL
4 I- 17
6,045 aq,fL 0::
::::>
0 6.681 aq,ft.
U
3 ~ 48 72
6.045 aq,ft. 18 6.036 aq.ft.
0:: 6.173 aq,fL 6.506 sq.ft.
2 19 22 44 73
6.045 aq,fL 47 6.366 aq,ft.
5,967 aq,ft. 6.486 sq.ft. 6.552 oq,fL 6.717 oq.ft.
1 20 21 45 46 74
7.859 aq,fL 7.222 aq.ft. 7.683 sq.fL
7.458 sq.fL 7.404 sq.ft. 8.008 sq.ft.
PIaNEERengineering
CMLENGINEERS LANDPl.ANNER$. LANOSURVEYORS UNDSCAPEAACHrmCTS