HomeMy WebLinkAbout4. Visioning Briefing Papers
fY
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor Schmitt, Councilors Lehman, Helkamp and Menden --
FROM: Councilor Terry Joos
SUBJECT: Visioning Briefing Papers
DATE: April 12, 2005
Attached are briefing papers on six areas that have been drafted by students ofthe
Humphrey Institute. The students are the individuals who are helping the Steering
Committee and Anne Carroll identify broad themes that resulted from the community
conversations, open houses, and other activities that have been scheduled to gain input on
Shakopee's future.
1'd appreciate it if you would review these prior to the end of the week, and e-mail to
Mark McNeill and me any questions or responses that you might have, so that the
students can prepare responses for you when they give their update at the April 19th
workshop meeting. (The workshop meeting begins at 5:00; the update on the Visioning
Initiative will begin about 6:00, and should last for 45 minutes.)
Based on input that you give, the Steering Committee will draft a "Visioning
Framework" at its meeting on April 21 st. This will then be the basis of discussion for the
City Council and Steering Committee joint meeting to be held from 6:00 PM to 9:00 PM
on April 28th, at the Police Department Training Room.
Terry J008
Steering Committee
Council Liaison
Sports and Recreation
This Brief includes outdoor activities, entertainment options (commercial such as Valley Fair and
community organized such as those for seniors), team sports, and indoor community-based opportunities
for sports and recreation such as the Enigma Teen Center and the Shakopee Community Center. The
information was gathered from a series of focus groups, community conversations, surveys, and an open
house, and then clarified and refined through extensive communication with the Steering Committee
who brought Shakopee's unique voice to the work. Overall, the community feels that sports and
recreation in Shakopee helps connect people with each other and the broader community, and promotes
a healthy lifestyle. People comment on the community investment in local activities and the high level
of "boosterism" to be found. While there is not an overwhelming deman<k;fpr changes or to address
issues, several specific recommendations were made by the communit.J'~e that river issues are
discussed in separate brief.) .'=::i::..
Outdoor recreation opportunities need publi~ ~vest~Bt to move into the
future ~=-"" ~ =. ............
- --
~. -
While Shakopee residents may not all agree on impro~~!!ents to tgeir outdoor r~tioDal system, they
do have a strong awareness and appreciation for the Ifammbbeaut~laf the area. Bot1i:tlire city's 2003. Park
and Recreation Survey and community conversations indlc~~b.~i~y1rse and suppoft of walking and
biking trails as well as mid-size neighborhood parks: ''Nice wlitl;Ii!}.g and bike paths; trails/regional trail
system; parks, river paths, etc.," are some o:t1h~really good thi~S::about living in Shakopee. In
addition, both summer and winter outdoor recr~tii~il options are~<ifind available.
~,-' ; -..:::: _ ,', _ _2>~-
The community is aware that it is growing and c~giI~g;;flfi~1;)n~h this growth is the concern that
outdoor areas may become OveQl~ij$:.2J: neglected.1\4~"Y are als~are that the community is becoming
more diverse and recognize !hKf'oumiacommunalli:eas are affavenue to create and maintain
community among group~.;t.y reco~end steps bci\ak~p. to preserve and manage outdoor recreational
areas and to foster healthy cO~llnity ~wth in Shak~~. The following suggestions are common
concerns and bear n~;;ttgg~ . ... ~~;:; .. . .. "w.J
~;;?E?:3~;;~w; .-.~0~t'~> ~~~~_ ._,~
. Follow u~the cormiiitMeTIt to e~ce !Iuber Park
. Maintajf1f;_eappropriate mtEer ofP$Wstaffto population
. Focus on fore~!~~ and green ~es f
. Outdoor recre~~al areas ne~"ito become more family friendly with better amenities (such as
restrooms) and pla~und ecjfpment for children
. Require new develop.~s;:s install and maintain communal green spaces
Community highly values sports, and indoor recreation needs balance
Much of the community of Shakopee agreed that sports matter to all ages and are important to civic life.
The community rallies around its teams and supports an active lifestyle through recreational activities of
all kinds, much of it revolving around the Community Center's athletic and workout facilities. Many of
the comments point to a desire for more balanced indoor recreational development with comments like,
"an indoor recreational pool should be a higher priority than a second indoor ice arena," and many feel
indoor tennis courts would be a positive addition. They also asked for more options to the existing
opportunities such as open hockey at the ice arena and keeping the recreational center open longer. And
more than just the teens noted the importance of Enigma Teen Center, and several asked that it be left in
its present location.
Judith Spanberger, 4/12/2005 Page 1
Entertainment options could include more fine arts and a wider range of
culturally specific events
Residents value the centrality of entertainment options in Shakopee and feel that "you can do most
anything right in town." Entertainment options are varied and plentiful within the Shakopee area, but see
a lack of the culturally specific activities that recognize and celebrate the diversity that is the history and
legacy of Shakopee. The community is aware that it is shifting culturally and they see a need for
community-wide and well-supported cultural activities. They also point out that while there is incredible
participation by the Shakopee community in the school-centered arts, there is a need for more arts that
would involve the entire community; specific suggestions included adding this to the Community Center
to broaden the nature of the Center as an important gathering place.
--
Shakopee is seen as an entertainment magnet to the surrounding area tl!titidmg the Twin Cities with
such appealing options as the Renaissance Festival, Valley Fair, M~im:T,ake Casino and Canterbury
Downs. Suggestions were made for more publicly sponsored faIJ!~ a~unity-building
entertainment options with broad enough publicity to attract as milch oft~mmunity as possible.
~"'" "<$,' ,'~
,~"* ~~
~.----.~ --
Conclusion ,;.~? "" ... ........."'~
-~ % ""'~~- ,
It is through knowing neighbors and fellow community ~a~Ilbers .1 Shakopee'sU1'tk~ and prized
small-town feel will survive future challenges, and there i~m~~areness that~tlie community's
extensive recreational and entertainment options are excellelftiJilys to build and unite the community.
Capitalizing on this value to build commonali:i.es through sportS::!mi recreational venues may prove
invaluable as Shakopee continues to grow an<h!:e~~more divers~.,,:
~ ~~~,'~.."
Shakopee values its place and the people they s~ it"~l:_~~"-highly aware of the natural beauty
within their community, opportl:lB._for a healthJSiiistyle, aifi?ine increasing diversity of their
population. They strongly SU1i!l1bii op~i~ns that fostei;communiry and a healthy lifestyle for all. Citizens
of Shakopee appreciate aI19~ue the irljI quality of'ii!e they find in Shakopee, and are sincerely
committed to maintaining thi~~;::li~ o~ :~a sharing it with their neighbors.
--
-
Judith Spanberger. 4/12/2005 Page 2
Close but Not Too Close
The information in this brief is drawn from a series of community conversations, surveys, focus groups,
interviews, input from Steering Committee members, and an open house for the Shakopee community.
We know that Shakopee is a place that values preserving its small community while welcoming the
conveniences that are associated with living in a large urban area. Most community members are not
anti-development. Although some community members express some concern over encroaching
development, many of those who participated in community conversations and focus groups reported
that they also enjoy some ofthe benefits associated with commercial development.
It should be noted, however, that the community does see a need for conscientious development that
focuses on the community. This has been neglected in the past and ther~S-c:a fear that while community
members were once very much connected with each other and to the ~ they are not now engaging as
they used to. There is a strong desire for managed growth and dev~~st.ntthat will consider the
individual needs ofthe community first. ~ ~....i~
Balancing "small-town feel" with "big city amsffifr~\' . ...~~.
Shakopee residents enjoy access to "big city amenities'anid the II1!1ltiple opporti.iii"~~ 9Jretail shopping
and entertainment, while deriving the benefits of living~small ~~. There are 6iThts for shopping,
dining, and various entertainment venues such as Valley Fa5ilCS'terBUry, and the lfenaissance Festival.
They describe Shakopee as a "self-sufficient city" where you~l~:atR.do most anything you want right in
town" while still being "far enough away fro~be city to enjoyllisfresh air and open spaces."
Community members take pride in identifyin~~i_~iee as a free-~~ community, and there is a
desire to preserve what defines Shakopee and rrlll<:es::;;iii1ilt~. ~
~~ ~~=~~': . A?
One of the most frequently cit~4;;,t~~ents was th~ifAl)ortan;;~"maintaining a small-town feel." (See
more on small-town feel in '!i~~paiat~~f). Commiihity memoers feel a strong sense of pride in
Shakopee's historical "rog,_ess" ansek to prese~ it."Residents find value in both the added
"convenience and accessibilityt&urbq,i"s,ervices afforeBnem while preserving Shakopee's "small-town
feel." Although community mem0i1ilraiffi~EmrQ~s&d nature and density of future development,
there is consensl;l~~niiji~~balan~betweenremning a sense of history and identity, and
accessibility tQ:$lrge city coh\~ynces:i~~oth~ words, balancing the old and the new.
.....,:':~: _,;"tf~_ w=~o":~~<;~
People are ri.~ connecfmt as tm;y once were and could be, and are not
engaging as m-iihin the cwmunity
The Shakopee commuml'a:finds c~ections between people and communities very important. The town
was built on personal relat:.iil:~~ilrs with each other as well as with their neighborhoods. Some residents
fear that this lifelong interc(f~ctedness that has been built over the years is gradually diminishing due
in part to less people-oriented development. Some residents are concerned that there is insufficient
encouragement and support for development that actively promotes community-building and
connectedness to the city - a core Shakopee value.
Comments drawn from a survey of approximately fifteen real estate agents who work in Shakopee, as
well as from various community conversations, highlight this concern:
. Shakopee is more car-oriented than people-oriented
. There are no sidewalks
. New housing construction does not promote community-building (houses with no front doors or
front yards and garages that serve as entranceways)
Jena Min, 4/10/05 Page 1
. Residents in some parts of Shako pee don't even really know they are part of the city
. Poor use of open space
. Lack of good public transit options
While Shakopee residents reported being satisfied with accessibility to roads and highways and reaching
their destinations with relative ease (in large part due to Highway 169), residents have expressed some
concern over the lack of consideration for people's movement, especially in newer developments. The
community expressed a desire for more "community directed" developments that include as standard
features such as sidewalks, small playgrounds for children, front yards and front doors, and less
prominent garage doors.
, ~
For the most part, residents share a mutual concern that community me~a.will continue to be
disengaged and eventually Shakopee will become completely fractur€ At th~ same time, there is a
clear hope and in some cases an expectation that keeping these "~Eakes" in mind will help spur
more awareness of these issues and that future development ~il1i'e requi~tUo better respond to the
community's need for more connectedness and engagement1~ , · .~,
-w;&W<W ~ ~.i~
There has been little management of the r:t@~tive eflects of un~tL,C)lIed growth
One of the foremost set of concerns for the Shakope[c~W1ity~ negative inii1i~t of rapid growth
and development. As previously mentioned, community m~-See some benefits to development
such as big box retailers and accessibility to~ds but only if itit~~pntrolled. The following comments
made by residents reflect some of the negativ~~equences of gr&th thc~.t have been observed:
___ __A>>>'
- ~. . 0~=,>: , ~~;=~
. Need for proactive management for congestii~ ana~J~~elop~t
. Importance of retaining cOnununity values alo~ ~h the"~h
. There is a need for a bette=ir~lefhousing ~ign and tIre quantity built
~.'~ """*'
,"~, ~ -
. ,"W~ ,~= ~_
Community members suggeste~that de~lopers be manclated to meet minimum standards in
consideration of public interests~a. gri~r~a$ and ~~n spaces. Such directives would ensure that any
future developme!1~.~~~M~-lt~ nee~~~Jhe co~y, not the developer.
ConclusioS~i~:" . '_t~:~~ ....::;r=:~ _
%F~ "'" ':,;~;. ' ~~0i', ~;~;,#
Shakopee valu~t~ng in a smallBmmuui1:y with its own identity and roots while welcoming the
conveniences usulfr~a~tributed to ling in larger cities.
The community largely ai~s tll#1he problem is not development, per se. In fact, people enjoy much of
the added value that come~;;expansion. The community does, however, see a need for carefully
guided "people-oriented" d~~lopment in its housing design and consideration for public spaces. Past
developments did not always promote community-building in the city, which residents view as
contributing to people's overall disconnectedness. They do see many opportunities for "thoughtful
growth" that would require prioritizing and planning to successfully preserve Shakopee's core values
and sense of identity.
The challenge will be to maintain the "small-town feel" in tandem with future development. Residents
believe that focusing on community priorities and values in future development considerations will avert
past problems, allowing the community to benefit from living in a small town while enjoying city
convelllences.
Jena Min, 4/10/05 Page 2
Economic Opportunities and Challenge of Growth
Shakopee has historically been a self-sufficient community with a rich supply oflocal jobs and housing,
which allowed the city to operate relatively autonomously. With growth in housing and job
opportunities, as well as increased access through new highway development, the economic situation in
the community has changed. With increased access, more residents are working outside ofthe
community and new retail and commercial developments no longer serve just the community of
Shakopee.
Economic decisions are a key component in determining the health of the ~unity based on tax base
created from development as well as how choices affect the livability aI!~pporttimties available to
residents. As population and business growth continues it is paramo1!!!~t~i&ddress how the changing
environment has affected Shakopee, and the decisions the city mUSca:ifak~aping own future to
achieve the stated and desired community values and priorities:;, ""~.: .'0~_
*"- -- -,~
~. -. ~
~ - ~
~,"<' ~
In addressing the economic opportunities and challenges tS!1~owtiiin Shakopee, ivit3mportant to
remember that the community is dynamic and does not~~lst in a va~,!um. In addition.~<2it>>has the
ability to affect the nature and rate of growth within tfie'e1\.li;2ased ort~e community's ~nterests.
The following issues articulate how growth has or will affeiit~~e~~e,ope and scale ~ retail and
residential development, and the role that Shakopee plays as ~@art ofthe Twin Cities region and as
an autonomous municipality.'" ... ~;".>^"
Community development choices~[R;~j:7,l>_e made pT9it;eti:tfely to avoid costly
infrastructure changes after devel.,mYrffSitlas occur~0rd
Residents value the fact that Shakopee is "a fisca~ se~uffi(>t:~ni!~1hat does not spend money
frivolously." To respect thi~;~ity value, it is~ntial that .. city is "able to sustain and maintain
community infrastructur~thoufi~~~l:lificantly inc~.~sing taxes:To do so, city leadership must decide
to what extent they wa6~direct thtiIture developi\\mt must be designed to include the amenities that
residents desire - as 5PP6~~~Q implgtenting them a~ds, if possible, at the community's expense.
~~"-7:(~'~~:", ' ~~~:/~. .~~
Specific exam~~~.m~comm~i:,,:inplltl~timodal transportation options such as trails,
sidewalks,;;!!s>'aas, 'an~tlt!~:;~ transiiimt facilitate ''Interaction between residents and neighborhoods and
help to,n!fmote small to~~l" - afi;imarc,bing value in this community. While "big box" retail
establ4'B&nts grow in nun1"liEand hou~evelopments stretch farther from the city center, there is
also ~a de'Iiil~or housing ana::iiPppin&Jirat is "more people-oriented and less car-oriented." To reduce
future costs"fif~eating a built'SS'ironment that.reflects and support local values, these preferences
must be considen~~dvance Ithe city sets development standards and expectations.
New housing st~J~~;?shakopee is changing from affordable to exclusive
ill both absolute and regiial terms, Shakopee has historically offered very affordable housing options.
Recent and dramatic increases in housing prices threaten this status and have also changed what is
considered affordable. There is a stated desire for a mix of multi-family and single-family housing as
well as housing options that appeal to all socioeconomic groups. Beyond that there are varied
perspectives. Some residents would like to see "low-cost really affordable housing - under $125,000"
while others would like to see "less multi-family development." It would be helpful to further unpacking
and promote thoughtful discussions about what these mean to people and the implications of various
choices. Balancing these desires is a difficult task yet is essential if Shakopee wants to remain a "warm,
welcoming, friendly community" for all people.
Kelly Betteridge, 4/1212005 Page 1
Residents expressed a strong desire to maintain a community where residents can live and work locally
means that it is essential to align the types of jobs available with the housing stock in the region.
Shakopee is seen as a community with a "strong employment base." Historically the area was home to
many "farmlblue collar workers" and "now there is a mix of employment opportunities including
executive level positions." If the city would like to offer residents the convenience ofliving and working
locally, the mix of employment options must align with housing options. In addition, it is essential that
the housing market offer lifecycle housing that allows for families and households of all ages, sizes and
socioeconomic groups to live in the community. In order to achieve this there must be housing stock that
caters to:
.~"'''''-
--- -
. Young families with limited economic means ,d!!:ff!: =;
. Families with school-age children that require more family-frieEly~~nities like parks and
playgrounds ~ ~
. Empty-nesters who would like smaller housing units wit~u~lunenities ......
. Executives who prefer historic buildings with characteer=tatliti6nal suburbE,m-ge lots with high-
end housing units ~--~_
. Seniors who would like to either age in place or jil\1.o Shakop~e to live in faci1It@la.m cater to
their basic needs such as mobility, relationships, acti~, and a:e~s to services '5!f:'77
:~~~~~;;;? -~ :
Housing in Shakopee be balanced to serve ;1 range of family unlt~~th a diverse needs. Recent
development has been unbalanced, with a to:ai~on townhouses tliat:i~Jlot cater to multiple sectors of
the housing market. Balance in Shakopee's h~jg::stock is necessatffll?th~community to maintain
the support oflong-term residents, attract new(ime~hakopee's sm1E!imwn feel, and retain the
ability to function as a standalone community. ...-::. : ... :=~ ~ ",';;"
Recent retail develqmmll!1~cope an~~ale cre~le a difficult economic
climate for sustai!jfig sriiill~r, locally',~ned businesses
The development of~15i~elOC' retail tShakopee has ta:'k,e~"Jl1arket share from previously existing small
businesses. There is a desi~hin tS f/ommunity for ~;:convenience and savings that this type of
development provides, with at10~\;};j;Fl1Y'S~Bi{~ee that "locally-owned businesses are
successful"~~l~di~l~an undeI'i~ing that"'SmaIler shops cannot compete with big companies."
_-7 . - '-,--~n<" "~~~~;t~
Locall~iiYned businesses'FH~ase "iif~efit" in the community because local dollars stay local.
curi~i1ti~;:ti~~e are "a lot of fiGii:ly-owne~usinesses" that nearby residents value and where they enj oy
shopping.1:~Urvive, these tYPeofbusfuesses must capture enough of the community's market share
to remain via15I~Q. profitable.5is the number of existing small-scale developments decrease, so will
neighborhood ari1ijii}ies and aCi!~ss for nondriving residents including seniors and youth. Depending on
the size and numbe~ger~ail options available in Shakopee, sustaining both "big box" and locally-
owned businesses will'(5:~;iriicult. Addressing the challenge of sustaining businesses that cater to the
diverse needs and desin~!~8fthe community will require serious municipal commitment and active
tapping into the strong community perception that locally-owned businesses add value to the
community.
Current development and commute patterns threaten to change the nature
of Shako pee from a standalone entity to a suburb of the Twin Cities
Increased access to and from the cOillIl1unit)' through new highway development has increased the
opportunities for people to live in Shakopee and work elsewhere. As more of the population works
outside the community, Shakopee's "standalone" status may be threatened and eventually could lead to
Kelly Betteridge, 4/12/2005 Page 2
the city becoming a suburb rather than having a "sense of identify." Shakopee needs to make policy
decisions about how to balance market forces working to increase efficiency with the community
commitment preserving the value of a "small town feel" that has characterized the city in previous
decades. As the metro region expands and access to and from Shakopee increases, the community must
decide what its role will be in the region.
Development decisions must address projected local and regional growth while proactively developing
considering policy and design standards that allow the Shakopee to grow in alignment with the
community's values, expectations, and vision for the future.
Kelly Betteridge, 4/12/2005 Page 3
Small Town Feel
The community visioning process has produced a set of issues stemming from the desire to maintain,
encourage, and foster a small town feel in Shakopee. Residents value the sense of place and history that
characterizes Shakopee and its traditional town center. They see their community as more than a
bedroom community; it's a place to shop, work, live, and enjoy hobbies and activities. Residents also
value many close and trustworthy relationships among residents. Shakopee has a strong sense of
community where people care about each other and there is a warm and strong sense of belonging and
cohesion. Many residents moved to Shakopee - and stay - because of the small town feel. Shakopee can
be a place where multiple generations live, and where people spend their enyre lives.
~ .~. ~
..............................a .8'
Drawing on the connectedness of the physical environment and t~mrecti~ong people, small
town feel is something people know and recognize when they e4erience it. ;iesiSetlts expressed
concern, however, because they see the small town feel diminis~ with~gress~~ develepment
and changes to Shakopee's makeup.ii. ff .ii ..... A
.-'m__ ,',..___ ~ =
-~
The following issues are gleaned from comments and concerns oii#fi.~ residents who participated
in community conversations, focus groups, surveys, the communITy OpeiiWihse, and the Steering
Committee throughout the community visioning process. _ ..... .. ....i..i.i..i.......... _ ""
~- ~',"" ij
~
The concern for maintaining small town feel is at the~.o~flict over ~h and change.
People see much of the new development as lackin~at spesft~to'in feel. These issues stem from
the concern over neighborhood design and the.lackgersqfll co~:;to Shakopee.
--~ ~:= ~:----
~ _~ .8#- ,
There is tension about the dhQdreetwee. '~w" and the "old"
Shakopee residents value the connectios'iltlng neighbors~~'5wn with a "homespun feel"where
"people have roots." There isa co~~in the resideniinput that describes Shakopee as a
"generational town" .~~lJ.iTow u~li.1 their own children, and retire. "People care about
people" in Shak~arnr"pl~~ each ~.. T4ey want new residents to feel welcome and part
of the commulllfHowever, ther.~~f.ion bec"'hile people feel they are making efforts to
welcome n~esidents, not all resi~eellike ~ community makes an effort to include them. Some
people s~akopee is "not very we~ing for newcomers." While most residents feel that Shakopee
is "a j;gfll~~mmunity," this may ~ld less involvement" from newer residents because it is
difficult to ~al part of the relat_hips that already exist in the community. Even people who
have lived in ~ for 30 or 40.ijf;.rs open acknowledge that they're "not really from Shakopee -
not like the old-ti~ And w~hey may laugh as they say it, clearly some underlying tension
remams. ~
~
~
The nature of growth hasiranged Shakopee demographics, and tensions arise from differences in
culture, age, and religio~eliefs. While some people feel "there is a balance between old and new" and
note that both history and progress are assets, other Shakopee residents would like to see more cohesion
among all community members. There is a desire to see a "deeper connection to [Shakopee's] history"
and also to "retell Shakopee's story all over town." Maintaining and strengthening close relationships is
essential to fostering small town feel.
There is also a divide between older and newer parts of the city. There are few physical or social
connections that link historic Shakopee with the new developments, and this disconnect has perpetuated
the lack of relationship building. The necessity td drive on the highway to reach each side of Shakopee
divides the community and makes it more difficult to maintain the small town feel.
Breanne Daines, 4/12/2005 Page 1
There is a desire for increased participation in continued civic involvement
Whether it is attending community events like Derby Days and Shakopee Showcase or volunteering at
schools or the hospital, Shakopee residents feel the high rate of community participation is a testament
to the value the residents place in their town. This is not necessarily the case for all residents, however.
There was some concern expressed about the need to be more inclusive of newer residents in community
events, as well as a need for increased volunteerism across a broader spectrum of the community. Some
specifically noted the need to include people of different ethnic backgrounds on appointed boards and
commISSIOns.
There is also a concern about participation in government. With fast~h1l!d th~sulting school and
community center referenda, residents expressed a need for more ~~ ~cuss emerging
issues as well as participation in decision-making processes. Inc!flling all Sh~~residents in
community gatherings, volunteering, and civic forums is very il:l!laQrtant tOM,ai1itfl~lit~hakope~'s small
town feel because, as one resident says, "it provides a sense of eElded..4lihily an~e of1iings
greater than oneself." . .i.....i-=*i'.45
.~',""" ""',~.,
There is a desire to maintain and strengthen thtfgc,iI1it!ix of land uses in
Shakopee ...i . .f
Shakopee residents appreciate the variety ofland uses all.~ire to maintai~e-standing
community." With thousands of jobs, shopping choi,=f;and~ty ofhousigrtypes, Shakopee stands
out in the Twin Cities. There is "access to multiple ~ortunife~e plceorwhere residents can shop,
recreate, and work. There is a "good retail mix withiiilae cil, big~a main street, yet not too big
and congested." This appreciation for divers~ uS'e'ls iljportant I>~ember when continuing to
develop the land. Residents would like tq" serems mix con5iiuedilBhe future. There is a not-so-obvious
tradeoff between having a good mix ofli&iess and havi~veniences and affordable prices of
big grocery and retail chains. While t~~eniences are iil'rlSortant and must be recognized as
attributes that the cO~!~llIll1es, 1esideii5J:l.:Lust be aware that there is a tradeoff.
~
~ A.
~. ,~
Furthermore, ~pee residents~iverse h"~~ixes and choices. While some people focus on
the value o~ilding low-cost, reaiiiilordable !JfUsing,',' others suggest that "building high-end town
homes"~ld be good for the comm\ilr. These'?' are choices with clear implications that the city needs
to car~~ider as decision poinIH~'J1erge.
AiWY ~
"" -
== ,
Residents wan~ble to shop. re=ate. and enjoy life within their community. The ability to do this
creates a stronge~o Shakop~d fosters community pride and cohesion by increasing the
likelihood of chanC6lJM"II~fl"l;1Jter~h neighbors and fellow community members. Cultivating community
pride and cohesion is a~~iifial to preserving small town feel.
,~
~
--
~
~
F
Jii.W"
J:7
Breanne Daines, 4/12/2005 Page 2
Social Opportunities and Challenges of Growth
Shakopee has long placed great value in the connectivity that comes from community. Many members
of the community have lived in Shakopee for generations, and throughout the decades have cultivated a
sense of place that is firmly rooted in family, friendship, a strong work ethic, and the pride that comes
from personal investment in the place and in each other. As the community grows, Shakopee continues
to be greeted by a variety of people who have moved to Shakopee with the expectation that they can be a
part of a community that not only satisfies their needs but maintains the unique and historic qualities that
initially attracted them to Shakopee.
New residents present new social challenges for Shakopee. In particular, new residents of diverse
backgrounds present new: social challenges for Shakopee. New residents also present new social
opportunities for Shakopee. This brief will discuss those social challenges and opportunities that new
residents to Shakopee bring, including issues related to diversity, services, and the city's relationship
with its tribal neighbors.
Desire for community intimacy conflicts with the ability to welcome new
residents
Community members overwhelmingly value a small town feel and there is tremendous commonality to
what that means. The conflict arises, however, when existing residents become fearful that the
community's positive attributes may be diminished or changed by the influx of new residents. For many
community members, the small town feel is highlighted by a traditional downtown center, local
ownership of businesses, and gathering places within the larger community such as the community
center. This dynamic has given community members the opportunity to build and maintain connections
with each other and to develop a trust that enables some to "do business with a handshake."
For some community members, the small town feel is threatened by new residents, particularly those
residing to the east, or outside of "Old Shakopee." The fear is that new residents may place priorities of
convenience and accessibility to Twin Cities amenities over maintaining a tight-knit community. Those
sharing this fear point to the fact that some eastern Shakopee residents don't even know that their home
is located in the City of Shakopee - they hold the mistaken belief that their homes are located in
adjacent cities. There is also concern that new residents may not share the same moral values or strong
work ethic as some of the older residents.
Interestingly, many of the newer residents say they moved to Shakopee for the same reasons the long-
time residents love it, and most talk of being very involved and engaged in community activities related
to school, family/extended family activities, and church. And while some note that Shakopee is "not a
welcoming community," many others feel their neighborhoods are warm, welcoming, and safe, and their
relationships with their neighbors mean a lot to them. Their points of connection with the physical
community may differ from others, however, as more of them shop, dine, and play in nearby
communities rather than within Shakopee.
Shakopee is mostly a welcoming community but Shakopee is also a fearful
community
In addition to a growing economic diversity of housing, business and industry, Shakopee has faced a
significant change in population as it relates to etOOicity, culture, and race. The community has
expressed a broad spectrum of opinions regarding the population changes. For some residents, the
changes in population have come as a pleasant surprise, causing some to say "we are more diverse than
we thought!" Another resident indicated that "Shakopee is becoming a melting pot with an eclectic mix
Nick Wallace, 4/12/2005 Page 1
of people. Shakopee had a long history of diversity with various religions, languages, and cultures and
now history is repeating itself." Additionally, some residents see diversity as an opportunity to add new
members to the longstanding tradition of civic participation and community investment.
Others have expressed concern that diversity may bring "culture clashes" and they are "not sure that
they want [Shakopee] to be all things to all people." Most community members have noticed the
changes in population and by and large say they value diversity as an asset, but there is still a fear that
changes in community population may lead to changes in long-held values.
As different populations continue to grow, there are concerns among other community members that the
new populations are not integrating into the existing community. Whether by choice or as a result of
various barriers, the perception of autonomy among the new populations can be troubling to long-time
residents, leading to further divides.
One resident expressed this sentiment in stating, "diverse communities are staying relatively
autonQmous, and this is disconcerting to long-time residents; some resent this and become defensive and
insecure - they feel displaced." There is also concern among long-time residents that cultural differences
are contributing to emerging community problems, such as youth gangs. With these concerns, however,
there is also a widespread acknowledgement that racism remains largely unaddressed. Unable to truly
tackle such a contentious issue, many community members are guided by the sterile principle of
"Minnesota nice." I
In addition to ethnicity, culture, and race, diversity in Shakopee has manifested itself in areas of religion
and faith. Shakopee has long valued faith and religion with residents noting, "we care about a moral
community," "traditional values are still important," and "there are lots of faith-minded people and that
is manifested in the way people do things." In Shakopee, religious diversity used to mean German
Catholics lived next door to Irish Catholics, but today's Shakopee is home to a variety of churches, with
some catering specifically to the growing Russian and Latino populations.
The explosive growth of different types of churches, while adding to Shakopee's religious diversity, also
adds to the fear that the new are and distinct communities from the rest of
As more urban-based "storefront" churches, evangelical
churches, and other religious organizations begin to thrive in Shakopee, this difference in approach and
the associated variations in needs and expectations may become more noteworthy.
As the community grows more diverse, the need for a truly community-based decision-making process
grows more important. A number of community members have expressed a desire to see diverse
populations taking part in the decision-making process via community boards and commissions. This
desire may become more important as the number of children belonging to diverse populations enrolled
in Shakopee schools continue to outnumber the number of adults belonging to diverse populations.
Representation of these populations may become an even greater issue in the decision-making process
for city services and whether those services will make supportive accommodations for ethnic and
language differences.
Nick Wallace, 4/12/2005 Page 2
Shakopee's relationship with the Mdewakenton (Dakota) Sioux community is in
need of initiation I renewal
The Mdewakanton Sioux community has a deep historical connection with the city of Shakopee.
Revenues generated by the tribe foster ancillary support for local business and help promote Shakopee
as a regional tourist destination. The tribe has found much of its success, however, without having a
substantive relationship with Shakopee. This is especially noteworthy because of the tribe's ownership
of a major chunk of land wedged between "Old Shakopee" and the newer development to the east.
Although the tribe's sovereign nation status influences the nature of the relationship with Shakopee, the
tribe's ability to purchase additional land beyond the existing parcels is reason enough to continue
efforts to cultivate relationships with the tribe. Additionally, potential competition for gaming may
affect Shakopee's relationship with the tribe as Minnesota considers expanding gaming at Canterbury
Park. Although many decisions are made on the state level, there should be local exploration at what can
be done to initiate / renew a positive relationship with the.tribe.
Nick Wallace, 4/12/2005 Page 3
Shakopee's River Roots and Sense of History
Shakopee rightfully claims a rich history as a Minnesota river town, andfor over 150 years the economy
and culture of Shakopee have focused on the river. Once a transportation corridor and barrier to
Minneapolis and St. Paul trading centers, the Minnesota River was the major reason Shakopee
developed as a freestanding community with a largely independent economy. Early native peoples and
later settlers naturally congregated along early trade routes that converged where traders found agreeable
river landings and the land supported increasing agriculture. With its location on the river away from
major trading centers yet close enough to serve as a destination, Shakopee has long been a gathering
point that fueled an independent economy. With its success, Shakopee was&ventually chosen to become
the Scott County seat which again increased its value as a focal point and:SSp~d development.
",",'-
Shakopee residents told us that economic independence and long-t~iifi:i~,ess has led to a culture that
values business and community connections as well as hard wor~esid~~~ all ages and backgrounds
value their history and the sense of place provided by their histMic"%ructur~~iihey love Shakopee's
small town fee1.People value the environment and natur~;!3tj1ibit.rt~or wildlife ;r~Jhe riverfront and at
all community conversations connections to the Minn~~Qta River w~re a high pria'flit'ias. S.hakopee looks
toward the future. ~w · ..~ :.." '" ....
Unrestricted growth risks Shakopee's histofi'Giae~~ ofPlace~nd small
town feel _. ...
~;;;;'~>;(""" .~
With Shakopee's rapid growth has come a foc~~i~~~w business,"n~h~msing, and for some a fear
of new community culture. Shakopee residents lk1dt'Hi'imill:yes tom bySlle economic advantages of
growth and the loss of small town feel. Many reii(ents ~limtiI"ltfed commitment to creating a
vibrant downtown area, speciflllit1i!,in relation to ~oric d~town roots. Accomplishing such a
vision requires understandi!!#1fieF~history in If:IDr specific atea and making conscious decisions for
incorporating history into::1mUuture :flililic of the conitaunity. Some suggestions can be found in
examining how other river t~ haveiadressed thes~e questions, including Hastings,. Red Wing,
Stillwater, Winona, Dubuque, ~~L~~U 9ffeunspiration as well as ideas for the future of
Shakopee's river~E;:;:;>" · .. .. ._-
Mf!!f!1:- ..;~~~. ...~ -
Key questL<2Blremain: . ................ .. ... ~
~w~ .______.-~
~><:....~ -"":!fff'
~ ~-
-- ~ ~
. How can ~wntown evome to reSndle economic growth during a period of expansion that
focuses on new~deavors a~ from the river?
. More important~ew should it evolve, and what sort of development can be sustained under
current economic tre~1~, .'. ,.
Historic reuse of physical Pfoperties offers one tangible way to retain Shakopee's small town feel, yet it
requires great creativity and a determined vision from developers and city officials. Historic preservation
through designation of properties and neighborhoods as historic assures longevity of Shako pee's roots,
yet comes at a higher cost than demolition and new construction. Incorporating Shakopee's history into
Shakopee's future will require assessing where and how history should fit. It will mean assessing market
needs of the community and driving in a direction to meet those needs while maintaining a firm grip on
historic structures and design standards -- all while creating the creative culture needed for businesses to
succeed.
Lynn VanDervort, 4/12/2005 Page 1
This type of specific, vision-oriented development departs radically from development driven totally by
independent market forces. Rather than allowing others to shape Shakopee, Shakopee could instead
choose to shape the riverfront and downtown around small-town values and a clear vision for the future.
Redeveloping Shakopee's historic downtown and riverfront areas into a burgeoning center focused on
the river would require considerable effort and resources on the part ofthe city to find investment
opportunities, partnerships, and developers who not only choose to share the vision, but have the
resources, experience, and integrity to follow through. It would also mean creating the amenities and
experiences that draw both residents and visitors to these areas.
Shakopee must decide how to balance riverfront econc;>mic development
with conservation of the riverfront habitat #=-~_
~- _.
While Shakopee residents return their focus to the river, the challeng~=iEead will prove difficult to
balance. The current growth climate in Shakopee points toward cOJ!IDel!ei~1 and residential expansion
along the river, and a significant number of Shakopee residents wilt to s~ilis riverfront economic
development. An equally impressive number of residents el11~ize.d how ~!hey value the
riverfront as a unique ecosystem, one prone to flooding, s_~~'fc)l1alactivity, hom~tii~ountless species of
wildlife, and in need of protection for the enjoyment ofKture resi<lents.> . .d;
~ -. ----.....;;;::::?'
,,<= ---~ ~- ~,,'w'
-- ~- ~
Providing balance in a future vision will require compromt~ ~etlne needs ofvas:try different and
competing interests for a finite resource. History provides a le~ in balance, as Native peoples and
early settlers depended on the river and the sm~mnding ecosyste~!tr both sustenance and economic
opportunity. "~~~ im~'" . ..~
~",%q, .......,,;;..... ~-
· How can Shakopee honor these river roots ~ile d~rliit1g mo~ewfobs?
· How can competing interest~:::Pf developers anit ~~onmell_1:sts peacefully coexist in support of
community values and B.~imirj~~~ ";~ iF'
· Can Shakopee find sn~]ainable n~conomies th1!t will honor its river roots?
. Can Shakopee prote"ct~abitaabr river wi1dlife~'j'~'
~ ~" "WfflfWi>'
::,,%,~'., F
Nothing will cre~~~1:~~at",f,r chal~~~"c~hairtIi~::_ies faced when looking at the river. The riverfront is
a finite resourpand(l~.t:qent cn@J:ees will impact the ability of future residents to enjoy something
that Shako~~residents saiQ~valu~m&y:j:he ability to work and play in their hometown.
Competitig1met:ests have viablS!~,~es in';~riverfront, and historically, both economic development
and access to fR~atural enviro~nt ha\€ their places on the waterfront.
The challenges willlf~:t8t decideifiere each should exist, in what form and to what extent, and how to
transition between the'~arJ'iijg interests. Shakopee residents are interested in boat access to the river,
places to play, places for fiiiites to connect, and wild riverbanks where residents and visitors can enjoy
the river in its natural stato/At the same time residents believe businesses should have access to the
river, whether as a magnet to draw customers or as a resource to use as part oftheir business.
Either developing or conserving any riverfront property represents the loss of other uses, and is
particularly true in places where land meets water and state and federal regulations come into play. How
to ensure that the riverfront's future reflects community values will require a deeper level of planning
and communitywide support, and will challenge the entire community to find collaborative and
innovative solutions.
Lynn VanDervort, 4/12/2005 Page 2
Creating Shakopee's future that will challenge the community's capacity
for embracing change and creativity
Shakopee's history as a river town offers a number of potential pathways to the future. Balancing
historic preservation and reuse, riverfront economic growth and conservation, will increasingly require
public creativity and a higher tolerance - and support for - change. Some long-time community
members have a sense of hopelessness and fear around change, and are worried that growth will
inevitably destroy Shakopee's small town feel. By contrast, some relative newcomers expect community
leaders to take a more active stance to manage growth to preserve what they, too, value about Shakopee:
the sense of connectness, strong relationships, and the perennial small town feel.
Meeting competing interests will require a high level of creativity, and ~o~e's fast-growing
population offers an increasing wealth of creativity. Utilizing this cr~!4ty will mean embracing new
cultures, new ways of thinking, and innovative strategies. In shoI1~1litaean change. Fortunately,
embracing forward progress runs at the very heart of the history ai[U cultureitShakopee. With
community values in hand and a clear vision in sight, staki~g~i tff$ soul anQ~grity of Shakopee as
an independent center of creative thought and change wilWelp to drive entrepr&sw~hip and enhance
Shakopee's already unique sense of place. g ~ ~~''''''' ..:;
.~.~ ~~
.~ -- ---
Lynn VanDervort, 4/12/2005 Page 3
.. Agenda . Process Update
~ShakOl"ee
....... · .YiSion(iJg.lniti~ti~~ . Process Update . Stakeholder analysis, data collection
beginning last summer with community
. Issue Briefs residents, businesses, and later with
City Council Update . Challenges and Opportunities Steering Committee
19 April 2005 . Next Steps . Over 25 community conversations and
. Questions focus groups
Anne Canon, Carroll, Franck & Associates . City-wide open house
HlI11phrey Institute of Public Affairs Graduate Students: . Realtor and industry surveys
Jena Min. Judith Spanberger, Kelly Betteridge, Nick Wallace, . Five Steering Committee meetings
katherine Farnham, Breanne Daines. Lynn Vandervort . Related research
2 ,
. Process Update . Process Update .' Process Update
'.. ,
. Documented residents' values, priorities, . Issue Identification in February and . Created Live Issues February-April
concems,and ideas March with Steering Committee and with Steering Committee
. Special attention to voices not often heard: citywide Open House participants - Small town feel
- Newcomers who are new immigrants - River roots/history and environment
(Latinos, Russians) - I see Shakopee as a place where... - Sports, recreation, and arts
- Other newcomers - Connectivity, .close but not too close"
- Seniors - Shakopee would be a better - Social opportunities and challenges of
- Families with young children community if... growth
- Renters - Economic opportunities and challenges of
- Religious groups (traditional and new) growth
4 5 .
1
.;:'
. Process Update . Issue Briefs . Small Town Feel
' ~.
. Search for solutions in April and May . Small Town Feel . Sense of identity, place, and history
with City Council, Steering Committee,
consultant and students . Community - People feel this is at risk, and don't like that
- Steering Committee meeting to articulate . Close but Not Too Close . Traditional town center
preliminary vision for Council, April21Sl . River Roots, Environment, and Historic - Part of the identity, and at risk
- City Council/Steering committee goals and Downtown . Close and trustworthy relationships valued
strategies workshop, April 28th by both long-standing and new residents
- Growth brings less citywide cohesion
- Attention shifting to more personal
7 connections, and people unsure of meaning
8 8
.. Small Town Feel g: Community CD' Community
. Safety and security . Expressed desire to welcome newcomers and . Volunteerism
- Fears that growth and change risks this embrace diversity - Deep and long-standing support
. Community where people care - Yet newcomers don't always feel welcomed
- Widely held across all stakeholders - Tendency toward neighborhood/personal vs. citywide - Newcomers are involved in new ways that
- Long-standing residents believe that connections poses challenges may be invisible or confusing to others
newcomers may not share this value . Religion . Strong support for youth and school
. Multiple generations - Long tradition of extensive religious connections system
- Primarily the focus of long-standing residents - Increasing number and variety disconcerts some - Long-term strategies to keep youth engage
- Housing, local employment, and development . High level of "boosterism" and local support have a major impact on the city's future
choices may not support this in the future - Rec options not inviting or relevant across all groups
10 11 12
2
.. "Close but Not Too Close" g; "Close but NotToo Close" .; River R?ots: Environment, and
.... ... Hlstonc Downtown
. Small town feel with "big-city" amenities . Broad range of employment opportunities o River defines history, economy, and
. Entertainment, shopping, dining options - Mismatch between socioeconomics (low and recreational choices
o "Can do most anything you want right here high) and available housing + holes in life- o Natural habitatfor wildlife
cycle housing reduce tenure and community
in Shakopee" connections - Development, recreation, and conservation
. Pride in community values and distinct o New highway access expands outward compete for finite riverfront resources
personality focus, threatens free-standing nature
- Concern that what makes Shakopee attractive -Impersonal housing (no front doors,
to both new and old will be lost if growth isn't monotony) conflicts with desire for building
managed better connections
13 ,. 15
.. River Roots, Environment, and 'aX Challenges and Opportunities . Challenges and Opportunities
Historic Downtown
. Traditional community gathering place o Commonality of values and priorities across o Growth resulting in shift from citywide to
- Rapid commercial growth along highways diverse stakeholders is astounding personal or neighbOrhood focus
threatens historic roots and downtown vitality o Perceptions of old vs. new are prOblematic - Confusing and subject to misinterpretation
- Historic and adaptive reuse, infill development, - Long-standing residents think newcomers don't o Sense of hopelessness and inability to
and responding to local needs challenges care about small-town feel, and community- shape the future is growing significantly
current development models, demands but they do, too o Questions remain regarding city
creativity, and requires commitment to a vision - Newcomers think long-standing residents are leadership's role in Shaping the future
afraid of change and have different standards
- but they aren't and don't - Public investment vs. private expenditures
- Tension around notion of "public good"
,. 17 ,.
3
. Next Steps . Next Steps . Next Steps
" "N
. Now that issues and questions are defined . April 29, 6-9pm: . Thousands of Shakopee residents are
more clearly, the City Council is the body - Goal/strategy-setting workshop with City aware of the Visioning Project:
best equipped to begin addressing the Council and Steering Committee - Nearly 25 community conversations and focus
issues . May - June '05 groups, surveys, Steering Committee
. Council has the authority necessary to turn - Vet draft vision and goals with the public - Citywide calendar, press, open house,
. June - August '05 cablecast Council updates; school fliers
the issues into actionable policy - Detailed comments from hundreds of people
- "Toolbox' workshops with City Council, recorded and published for public review
Steering Committee and Department Heads. . Many city and personal resources have
. September '05
- Finalize vision and documents been expended
,. 20 21
.. Questions? Comments?
f'GirrOIJ;
. We are confident that Shakopee will .. : :>&.~
continue to thrive thanks to your
commitment!
Anne Carroll
651-69M162
carrfran@qwest.net
Humphrey Institute of Public AffaIrs Graduate Students:
Jena Mln, Judith Spanberger. Kelly Betteridge, Nick Wallace.
Katherine Farnham, Breanne Daines. Lynn Vandervort
22
4