HomeMy WebLinkAbout14.F. Comp Plan Amendment to Extend MUSA, and Rezone Property-Res. No. 6244, Ord. No. 731
1'1. F.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
CASE NO.: 05-042
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Mark Noble, Planner I
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Extend MUSA, and Rezone Property
from Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban Residential (R-lB) Zone
MEETING DATE: May 17, 2005
REVIEW PERIOD: March 25, 2005 - July 22, 2005
INTRODUCTION
Tollefson Development Inc. has made application to extend Metropolitan Urban Service Area
(MUSA) to the subject property, and to rezone the subject property from Agricultural Preservation
(AG) Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone.
DISCUSSION
The request pertains to that portion of the former Shutrop property that is presently owned by
Tollefson Development Inc. This property is approximately 38 acres in size and is located north of
Eagle Creek Blvd., south of the Southbridge subdivision, and west of Pike Lake Road (extended). The
adopted Comprehensive Plan identifies this property for single family residential development. The
applicant has provided a concept plan that identifies a single-family development with 39 lots and two
streets that would intersect with the proposed extension of Pike Lake Road.
The following Goals and Policies contain provisions for the granting of MUS A only if all ofthe
following circumstances are found to exist. Failure to comply with all goals and policies shall result in
the denial of the request.
GOAL #1:
Growth and expansion of that portion of Shakopee served by public services shall be controlled and
focused to maintain the City's fiscal soundness consistent with other community-wide goals.
GOAL #2:
Any future annexation shall be undertaken in an orderly, fiscally sound manner. Property in annexed
areas shall be treated fairly relative to taxes and the provision of service.
Policies:
a. New areas will be added to MUSA only when that designation is consistent with
Goal #1 above.
b. Areas to be added to MUSA shall be located where utilities and community
facilities can be efficiently located or extended.
.
c. Designation of MUSA areas will be timed to enhance the City's ability to plan for,
develop, and/or acquire new utilities and public facilities.
d. The addition of new MUSA areas shall either be timed to coincide with the
availability of utilities and community facilities, or be coordinated with plans to
provided utilities and community facilities.
e. The City will find that new MUSA areas will be suitable for development within
the timeframe being considered.
f. Designation of new MUSA areas shall be undertaken to better react to the
marketplace and to serve the community as a whole.
The criteria required for the granting of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment are listed below with
proposed findings for the Commission's consideration.
Criteria #1 That the original Zoning Ordinance is in error;
Finding #1 The original zoning ordinance is not in error.
Criteria #2 That significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place;
Finding #2 Significant changes in community goals and policies have not taken place.
Criteria #3 That significant changes in City-wide or neighborhood development patterns
have occurred; or
Finding #3 Significant changes in the development of this neighborhood has occurred,
suggesting that this area be zoned and developed for single family residential use.
Criteria #4 That the comprehensive plan requires a different provision.
Finding #4 Zoning of the subject property to Urban Residential (R-1B) will be consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan, provided MUSA is allocated for this property.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
After evaluating the proposed project based on the above noted policies, staff has determined that the
policies are met or will be met in conjunction with proposed improvements; therefore, staff
recommend that this request be approved. Planning staff note that the property to the east has received
MUSA and rezoning to single-family residential. If this request is approved, the applicant will submit
a preliminary plat application that includes an extension of Pike Lake Road consistent with the City's
plans.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission reviewed this item at their May 5,2005 meeting and by a 7-0 vote,
recommended approval of the request to extend MUSA to the subject property and to rezone the
property to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone. A copy of the Planning Commission's report is attached
for the Council's information.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve Resolution No. 6244, a resolution approving the request to extend MUSA to the
subject property.
2. Approve Ordinance No. 731, an ordinance approving of request to rezone the property from
Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone.
3. Deny the requests to extend MUSA to the subject property and rezone the property from
Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone and direct staff to
prepare the appropriate resolution.
4. Table the matter and request additional information from the applicant and/or staff.
ACTION REQUESTED
Offer a motion to approve Resolution No. 6244, a resolution approving the request to extend MUSA to
the subject property, and to approve Ordinance No. 731, an ordinance approving of request to rezone
the property from Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone.
,~*
Mark NOble. ... .
Planner I
g: \cc\2005\05-17\cmpplnrezshutropnorth0504 2.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 6244
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE APPROVING A REQUEST TO AMEND
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO EXTEND MUSA TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
WHEREAS, Tollefson Development Inc., applicant and property owner, have requested an
amendment of the Comprehensive Plan to extend MUSA to the subject property; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as:
(See attached Exhibit I)
WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the
Planning Commission on May 5,2005, at which time all persons present were given an opportunity
to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council heard the matter at its meeting on May 17, 2005; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Shakopee
hereby adopts the following findings of facts relative to the above-named request:
GOAL #1:
Development of this property shall be controlled and focused to maintain the City's fiscal
soundness consistent with other community-wide goals.
GOAL #2:
This property is currently within the City limits; therefore, this not a request for an annexation.
This property shall be treated fairly relative to taxes and the provision of service.
Policies:
a. Development of this property is consistent with Goal #1 above.
b. This property is located where utilities and community facilities can be efficiently
located or extended.
c. Extending MUSA to this property is timed to enhance the City's ability to plan for,
develop, and/or acquire new utilities and public facilities.
d. Extending MUSA to this property is timed to coincide with the availability of utilities
and community facilities, or shall be coordinated with plans to provided utilities and
community facilities.
e. The City has determined that in extending MUSA to this property, it will be suitable
for development within the timeframe being considered.
f. Granting MUSA to this prop~rty is undertaken to better react to the marketplace and
to serve the community as a whole.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the request to extend MUSA to the property is hereby
approved.
Passed in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shako pee, Minnesota, held this
day of ,2005.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
Attest: ,
Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
Case No. 05-042
E~,~ 'T :t.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That part of Government Lot 2, that part of the Southwest Quarter, and that part of the the
So~theast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, all in Section 14, Township 115, Range 22,
Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the northeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter;
thence South 0 degrees 18 minutes 14 seconds West, assumed bearing along the east line
of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of775.94 feet to the point
of beginning of the tract to be described; thence South 80 degrees 43 minutes 35 seconds
West 421.77 feet; thence North 74 degrees 02 minutes 39 seconds West 356.96 feet;
thence North 70 degrees 21 minutes 41 seconds West 440.67 feet; thence southerly
339.49 feet, along a non-tangential curve, concave to the' east, having a radius of 1255.54
feet, a central angle of 15 degrees 29 minutes 32 seconds, and a chord which bears South
27 degrees 47 minutes 07 seconds West; thence southerly 327.48 feet, along a reverse
curve, concave to the west, having a radius of 35121.16 feet, and a central angle of 0
degrees 32 minutes 03 seconds; thence South 20 degrees 34 minutes 24 seconds West,
tangent to said last described curve 399.67 feet; thence South 18 degrees 56 minutes 26
seconds West 80.14 feet to the center line of Eagle Creek Boulevard; thence easterly
441.46 feet, along said center line being a non-tangential curve, concave to the north,
having a radius of 4800.00 feet, a central angle of 5 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds, and a
chord which bears South 73 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East; thence South 76
degrees 24 minutes 21 seconds East, continuing along said center line, tangent to said last
described curve 1215.89 feet to the east line of said Southwest Quarter; then~e North 0
degrees 18 minutes 14 seconds East, along said east line, and along the east line of said
Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter 1287.42 feet to the point of beginning.
Subject to the right of way of Eagle Creek Boulevard, (County Road No. 16).
ORDINANCE NO. 731, FOURTH SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA,
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP ADOPTED IN CITY CODE SEe. 11.03 BY REZONING
LAND LOCATED NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD 16, SOUTH OF THE SOUTHBRIDGE
DEVELOPMENT AND WEST OF PIKE LAKE ROAD FROM AGRICULTURAL
PRESERVATION (AG) ZONE TO URBAN RESIDENTIAL (R-IB) ZONE
WHEREAS, Tollefson Development Inc., applicant and property owner, have requested the
rezoning of property from Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone;
and
WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as:
(See attached Exhibit 1)
WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the
Planning Commission on May 5,2005, at which time all persons present were given an opportunity
to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council heard the matter at its meeting on May 17, 2005; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Shako pee
hereby adopts the following findings of facts relative to the above-named request:
Finding No.1: The original Zoning Ordinance is not in error.
Finding No.2: Significant changes in community goals and policies have not taken place.
Finding No.3: Significant changes in the development ofthis neighborhood has occurred,
suggesting that this area be zoned and developed for single family residential
use.
Finding No.4: Zoning of the subject property to Urban Residential (R-IB) will be consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan, provided MUSA is allocated for this property,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the request to rezone the property from Agricultural
Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone is hereby approved.
Passed in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shako pee, Minnesota, held this
day of ' 2005.
Mayor of the City of Shako pee
Attest: ,
Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
Published in the Shakopee Valley News on the day of ,2005.
Case No. 05-042
E'~ \'to \T ~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That part of Government Lot 2, that part of the Southwest Quarter, and that part of the the
So~theast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, aU in Section 14, Township 115, Range 22,
Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the northeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter;
thence South 0 degrees 18 minutes 14 seconds West, assumed bearing along the east line
of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of775.94 feet to the point
of beginning of the tract to be described; thence South 80 degrees 43 minutes 35 seconds
West 421.77 feet; thence North 74 degrees 02 minutes 39 seconds West 356.96 feet;
thence North 70 degrees 21 minutes 41 seconds West 440.67 feet; thence southerly
339.49 feet, along a non-tangential curve, concave to the east, having a radius of 1255.54
feet, a central angle of 15 degrees 29 minutes 32 seconds, and a chord which bears South
27 degrees 47 minutes 07 seconds West; thence southerly 327.48 feet, along a reverse
curve,. concave to the west, having a radius of 35121.16 feet, and a central angle of 0
degrees 32 minutes 03 seconds; thence South 20 degrees 34 minutes 24 seconds West,
tangent to said last described curve 399.67 feet; thence South 18 degrees 56 minutes 26
seconds West 80.14 feet to the center line of Eagle Creek Boulevard; thence easterly
441.46 feet, along said center line being a non-tangential curve, concave to the north,
having a radius of 4800.00 feet,. a central angle of 5 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds, and a
chord which bears South 73 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East; thence South 76
degrees 24 minutes 21 seconds East, continuing along said center line, tangent to said last
described curve 1215.89 feet to the east line of said Southwest Quarter; then~e North 0
degrees 18 minutes 14 seconds East, along said east line, and along. the east line of said
Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter 1287.42 feet to the point of beginning.
Subject to the right of way of Eagle Creek Boulevard, (County Road No. 16).
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
CASE NO.: 05-042
TO: Shakopee Planning Commission
FROM: Mark Noble, Planner I
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Extend MUSA, and Rezone Property
from Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone
MEETING DATE: May 5, 2005
REVIEW PERIOD: March 25, 2005 - July 22, 2005
SITE INFORMATION
Applicant: Tollefson Development Inc.
Property Owner: Tollefson Development Inc.
Location: North of Eagle Creek Blvd., West of Pike Lake Road (extended)
Current Zoning: Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone
Proposed Zoning: Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone
Adjacent Zoning: North: Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone (wIPUD Overlay)
South: Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone
East: Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone/Light Industry (I-I) Zone
West: Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone
Area: 37.8 Acres
Compo Plan: Single Family Residential (Proposed)
MUSA: This site is presently outside the MUSA boundary
Attachments: Exhibit A: Location/Zoning Map
Exhibit B: Applicant Narrative
Exhibit C: Concept Plan
INTRODUCTION
Tollefson Development Inc. has made application to extend Metropolitan Urban Service Area
(MUSA) to the subject property, and to rezone the subject property from Agricultural Preservation
(AG) Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone.
DISCUSSION
The request pertains to that portion ofthe former Shutrop property that is presently owned by
Tollefson Development Inc. This property is approximately 38 acres in size and is located north of
Eagle Creek Blvd., south of the Southbridge subdivision, and west of Pike Lake Road (extended). The
adopted Comprehensive Plan identifies this property for single family residential development. The
applicant has provided a concept plan that identifies a single-family development with 39 lots and two
streets that would intersect with the proposed extension of Pike Lake Road.
Planning staff sent out plans to other city departments and numerous reviewing agencies for review
and comment. Shakopee Public Utilities did provide comments, noting that the subject property is part
of a planned route of trunk watermain extensions along Southbridge ParkwayIPike Lake Road and
County Road 16.
The following Goals and Policies contain provisions for the. granting of MUSA only if all of the
following circumstances are found to exist. Failure to comply with all goals and policies shall result in
the denial of the request. ,
GOAL #1:
Growth and expansion of that portion of Shakopee served by public services shall be controlled and
focused to maintain the City's fiscal soundness consistent with other community-wide goals.
GOAL #2:
Any future annexation shall be undertaken in an orderly, fiscally sound manner. Property in annexed
areas shall be treated fairly relative to taxes and the provision of service.
Policies:
a. New areas will be added to MUSA only when that designation is consistent with
Goal #1 above.
b. Areas to be added to MUSA shall be located where utilities and community
facilities can be efficiently located or extended.
c. Designation of MUSA areas will be timed to enhance the City's ability to plan for,
develop, and/or acquire new utilities and public facilities.
d. The addition of new MUSA areas shall either be timed to coincide with the
availability of utilities and community facilities, or be coordinated with plans to
provided utilities and community facilities.
e. The City will find that new MUSA areas will be suitable for development within
the timeframe being considered.
f. Designation of new MUSA areas shall be undertaken to better react to the
marketplace and to serve the community as a whole.
The criteria required for the granting of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment are listed below with
proposed findings for the Commission's consideration.
Criteria #1 That the original Zoning Ordinance is in error;
Finding #1 The original zoning ordinance is not in error.
Criteria #2 That significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place;
Finding #2 Significant changes in community goals and policies have not taken place.
Criteria #3 That significant changes in City-wide or neighborhood development patterns
have occurred; or
Finding #3 Significant changes in the development of this neighborhood has occurred,
suggesting that this area be zoned and developed for single family residential use.
Criteria #4 That the comprehensive plan requires a different provision.
Finding #4 Zoning of the subject property to Urban Residential (R-1B) will be consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan, provided MUSA is allocated for this property.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
After evaluating the proposed project based on the above noted policies, staff has determined that the
policies are met or will be met in conjunction with proposed improvements; therefore, staff
recommend that this request be approved. Planning staff note that the property to the east has received
MUSA and rezoning to single-family residential. Ifthis request is approved, the applicant will submit
a preliminary plat application that includes an extension of Pike Lake Road consistent with the City's
plans.
AL TERNATIVES
1. Recommend approval of request to extend MUSA to the subject property and direct staff to
prepare the appropriate resolution.
2. Recommend approval of the request to rezone the property from Agricultural Preservation
(AG) Zone to Urban Residential (R-1B) Zone and direct staffto prepare the appropriate
ordinance.
3. Recommend denial of the request to extend MUSA to the subject property and direct staff to
prepare the appropriate resolution.
4. Recommend denial ofthe request to rezone the property from Agricultural Preservation (AG)
Zone to Urban Residential (R-1B) Zone and direct staff to prepare the appropriate ordinance.
5. Continue the public hearing to May 19,2005.
6. Table the matter and request additional information from the applicant and/or staff
ACTION REQUESTED
Recommend approval of request to extend MUSA to the subject property, recommend approval of the
request to rezone the property from Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban Residential (R-1B)
Zone, and direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolution and ordinance.
g: \cc\2005\05-05\cmpplnrezshutropnorth05042.doc
€~~hSO\'- A
=="-.
'G
AG
AG
AI 0 0
~ + ~ Subject Property
SHAKOPEE ,,"'"5"" ShakopeeBoundary
COMMUNnYPJUDESJ:NCE11J$7 s c::J Zoning Boundary
c=J Parcel Boundary
Rezoning a,nd MUSA - Shutrop
North
Developers II Land Investment II Property Managers FxH'~'" f:),
March 22, 2005
City of Shakopee
129 Hohnes 8t 8
Shakopee, MN
55379
Re: 8hutrop North Property - Rezoning and MU8A
Dear City of Shakopee-
Tollefson Development is requesting rezoning and MUSA Allocation for the Shutrop
nOlih property legally described on Exhibit A. The purpose of the request is to develop
the property as a single family residential community. The development has been
designed as a conservation subdivision in order to preserve the natural features of the
property. The property is 37.81 acres in size and is located north ofCountyRd 16. This
property is a natural continuation ofthe growth in the area. There are adequate
transportation and utility systems in place to serVe this project. The property is currently
guided for low density residential in the adopted comprehensive land use plan. The
property is identified as a primary MUSA staging areaby the City's Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed zoning for the land would be Urban Residential Zone (R-IB). The
properties to the east and north ofthis property are currently zoned Urban Residential
Zone (R-IB). There is a proposed zoning map attached as exhibit B. This property is a
natural continuation of the growth in the area. There are adequate transportation and
utility systems in p lace to serve this proj ect
This rezoning request meets the City of 8hakopee' s development criteria based on the
following:
1. There is a significant change in neighborhood development patterns to the
south and east of this property. The proposed land use for this property is
a natural continuation of the neighborhood and growth pattern.
2. The current zoning ordinance is in error because it is not consistent with
the adopted land use plan for this property.
3. The property needs a zoning designation consistent with W s
comprehensive land use designation. Services are available to this
property allowing development.
4. Property to the east and north are currently zoned R-IB.
17271I(enyon Ave.[ Suite #103 e Lal<eville[ MN 55044 · Phone (952) 435-1010 e FAX (952) 435-1020
Email - info@tdi-mn.com
www.tdi-mn.com
F><+\ ,e:,,\ "01- .
l
5. The development of this property will allow the extension of Pike Lake
Road to County Rd 16, which is an important road connection for the City
of Shakopee. The development will also facilitate a new fire station site
and trail connections to a new City Park.
Please let me know what other infonnation I can provide. Tollefson Development looks
forward to working with the City of Shako pee on the development of the highest and best
use for this property.
S~~_.~
Matthe' Weiland, Project Manager
Tollefson Development
I
!
6
~
~
l . n . ~
I '>
~
11 , ~
/to
:..
l:
"
I>
l;'
i
S-
f'
In
~ .I. lD
...
a 0
n
a To
I
S !
0 !
i
j3!
1;),-..,
~~
!ip
~t.>
'(:!
t
a C)
.
i ~
I :~ i :J:
I ij
I
~~~Ig~;a r:~ I I j -
I . I .....
g~~... ~C)=<: I Ii
"!e le~~'" ~l;) I i i 0
~~~l;j~~ Me I i I
S:'"I'"I~",l;jo", .... i' r
~~1S ~~ Sl19 : : I~ m 1 ~
~ 5!:lO); ~ G> I
.:t ~ SSg:l m ,
~ I O:::~(j)b>
I I I C) i iZs' 0 =
( I I O'(')-c~
=,;:;:,:C :J:
en ~l:(T\o
~ too '" g ;g<!! :: ;!;' :;;0 ~
~ ~ :u ~~ yg Ul:r
a... ~ 2 m
~ - r:: I; Illm:-l6'
~ ~~l!lC;1g~ :>:'/' ~ ffl ~7 ! ' 8~ )> ~
q ~~~;,;!iJiJ ~Qj ~ !2~ j; J"I-Io.
"'-< I ~ tn+(T\-
'" ~ :8
.2 r:: I. 1.60,[
z i j
/1l 0;0 Z
t; m:::l [TJ
q !
)l' CJ
8 )>
'" 11 r
q
\~; SHUTROP 2nd Addtlon John Oliver & Associates, Inc. ~~= 'f:.raz.. ~~ ~':,.P:: ~~ DATE: 3/05/05 RI'.V DAn: I' OESCRIP7ION
NO. . !.
SHAKOPEE. MN -~. - ~ - r--.. wpervlsJon CIlId that I am a duly DESIGN BY: dOH I!
FOR: Ucensed Pn>fesslanol ":llneer under RAWN~' BRK ! :
6 :eot r. I'naJelna 2'raD" 8uUe !lOO the laws of the State Minnesota. D .
o o' TT' illIT:-'I)'\ ~ J/N lS688T CHECKED BY:~
... (BtiZ)BBof-B046 (YAZ)8B4-8(US DWG FlI.E: 156202C1
'~\ ~ g,.!, I ',\ I I I'. SIgned: I,
OfJ'i4.. in: .ell<: JN11trr, 11unururlla John C. Bertelsen mer FIlE: N/A i!
ancl B7'0a1:1Ur> Cll1ll.... JCmn..oCcl I Date: 11'24105 Reg. No 14950 IFI1.E NO.: 1562.10-03 g:= --:~L
CONCEPT PLAN .
, l' E')t"+\ l e \,.. C. Cell 48 Hours before digging
'","'11" \ GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
r TwIn Cities Area 651-454-0002
. I MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-:1166
, ~
\ ~
Dr" Ii!
11'\ \ DESCRIPnON: ~
< II', r \ That port or Government Lat.2 that part of the Southwest Quarter, and that part of
ill I ,\, the the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, all In Section 14, Township 115.
. '\ Ronge 22. Scott Count)! Minnesota, descnoed as follows:
), I \ "'" Commencing at the northeast ccrner of sold Southeost Quarter of the Northwest
111 i r ' Quarter; thence South 0 degrees 18 minutes 14 seconds West, assumed beorlng along
I . the <lOst line or sold Scutheast Quarter of the Northwest Quorter, a distance of 775.94
feet to the point of begfnnln9 of the tract to be descnoed; thence South 80 degrees
,'''---'''' ",-. ~" ...... 4J_mlnutes..:55 .seconds West 421.77 feet; thence North 74 degreell 02 minutes :59
'" seconds West 356.96 feet; thence North 70 degrees 21 minute!l 41 seconds West
441167 feet; thence southerly :539.49 feet, along 0 non-tangential curve, concave to
the east, having a radlulI of 1255.54 feet, a central angle of 15 degrees 29 minutes ~
32 seconds. and 0 chard which bears South 27 degrees 47 mlnute!l 07 secondS' West; is
thence southerly :527.48 feet, along 0 reverse curve. concaVe to the west, having a
radiUS of 35121.16 feet. and a central angle af 0 degrees 32 mklutes 03 seconds;
._ thenCe South 20 degrees 34 minutes 24 second !I West, tangent to !laid lost described j';jc:i
CUM 399.67 feet; thence South 18 degrees 56 minutes 26 seconds West 80.14 feet to a:Z
tM center line of Eagle Creek Bwlevarc/; thence eastsrfy 441,46 feet, 0/0n9 sold center
line beIng a nan-tangentiol curve. con~ve to the narth,. having 0 radius of 4600,00 ;:!: :<: ml ~ i ,.,
...--'--'.... feet. a central anl11e of 5 degreell 16 mInutes 10 seconds, and a chord which bears ~ ~ a: ~ ~ 0
'" South 73 del1rees 46 mfnutes 16 seconds East; thenCe South 76 degrees 24 mfnutes In m Co> Z 6
I 21 seconds East, contfnulng along sold center /fne. tangent to sold last descdbed curve 0 f;j ~
1215.89 feet to the east line of sold Southwest Ouarter; th/lflce North 0 degrees 18 ,., In lCl
minutes 14 seconds Eallt, along said east line. and oIonl1 the east lins of safd :;; In
\ Southeast Ouorter of Ite Northwest Quarter 1287.42 feet to the parnt af bel1inning. ili ili III ,~I ~.. -
\" !I. Subject to the rIght of way of Eagle Creek Boulevard, (County Road No. 16). F.l::J d
~~ .~~~~ Z
""..J~- 1!1 RJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
iSoc5a~~
NOTES TO SKETCH: .. It J~ ~ ;
~:6:; ~ II
.Thls is not 0 Boundary SlJlWy. 5 t? '0 Ii E U
-a. s; cr :!::i .!!!
Orlentatfon of this bearing system is based an tM .. l; E'~ {!
east nne of the Sir 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of SectIon ;.5] "Ifi" 18 !l
14 to have an assumed bean'ng of S 0018'14. W. 1'; ~;g~ d'
:5 ",s.!lCfl c l
~..'O~.. ,cf
'E E c....:5 ~
tj.t:J:-o
,., .2" III
.Q"\!'~"3: ..
I)t.c.; en" "tJ
l; s'X.i- ".s
,cl!!~u" e. 8
_ a...::J:5 V; .
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY:
tS
TOTAL PLATTCD AREA: 1,646.882 Sq.Ft. 37.81 Ac. oS
PROPOSlrD RIGHT OF WA Y ARCA ,,'
STREET A; 83,715 Sq.Ft. 1.92 Ac. ~ e
PROPOSCD RIGHT OF If A Y ARlrA .... lil 1 ~
STREET B: 102,879 Sq.Ft. 2.36 Ac. .S! 1 ~ I
PROPOSCD RIr;HT OF' WA Y AREA () -1 .
EAGlE CRlrJrl< BOUlEVARD: 66,272 Sq,Ft, 1.52 Ac. Of" i i J
PROPOSCD R/r;HT OF' WA Y AREA U) ... . '
PIKE LAKE ROAD; 77,547 Sq.Ft. 1.78 Ac. ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~
TOTAL PROPOSDJ I! :g l'i ill~. '
RIGHT OF WAYARE:A: 330,41:5 Sq.Ft. 7.58 Ac. ~] -!~! ~j'
TOTAL EXISTING '-. 8" 'l' l! ...
MAR Rlr;HT OF WAY AREA: 54.5135q.Ft. 1,25 At:. ~J t:t: .;I!
EXISTING KrnAND ~ ~~..: III
/" WITHIN PROJF.'CT BOUNDARY: 7J,113 Sq.F/. 1.68 Ac. (,) ;;:g ~'!l
( "l"l--' CIS
( NUMBER OF' UNITS: 40 .e ~ .w ,- "---
I, /" GROSS DENSITY: 1.06 Unfts/Ac. 0 I
, NIT DENSITY: 1.47 Unfts/Ac. ~ '
" GROSS DENSlTY~ TOTAL UNITS / TOTAL ACREAGE
NIT DENSlTY= TOTAL UNITS / (TOTAL ACREAGE - ROW - WET1.AND)
MAXIMUM eUIWING HEIGHT: 30 Ft.
>-
LOT SUMMARY: I I-
0:::
BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2
LOT 1 34,189 sq,ft. 0,78 acres LOT 16 17,493 sq"/' 0.40 acres
LOT 2 23,046 sq.ft. 0.5J acrell LOT 17 19.250 tSq.ft, 0.44 acres
LOT 3 25,861 sq,ft. 0.59 acres LOT 18 511.217I1q.ft. 1.36 acres
LOT 4 37,338 sq.f/' 0.86 acres LOT 19 22,446sq"l. 0.52 acres
B'LO"K 2 LOT 2D 21.1:50 sq.ft. 0.49 acres
v, LOT 21 27, 167 sq"t. 0.62 acrell
LOT 1 28,389 sq.ft. 0.65 acrell LOT 22 29,578 IIq.ft. 0.68 acres ZONING INFORMA nON: I
LOT 2 19,762 IIq.ft. 0.45 acres LOT 23 31.864 tSq.ft. 0.73 acretS
LOT 3 18,2:57 sq.ft. 0.42acrell LOT 24 27,004 sq.fl. 0.62 acres PROPOSED ZONING CLASS: R-1B
LOT 4 38.149 sq.ft. 0.88 acres LOT 25 27,891 sq"t. 0.64 acres AU-OWASLE DENSITY: :5 UNITS/ACRE
LOT 5 211.694 sq,ft. 0.68 acres LOT 26 27,1168 :sq.fI. 0.64 acres. - - - - - - FRONT YARD SETBACK; 20Ft.
LOT 6 51,5119 sq.ft. 1.18 acrell LOT 27 51,261 sq.ft. 1.16 acretS REAR YARD SETBACK; 30Ft,
LOT 7 29,672 sq.ft. 0.68 acrell LQT 28 47,747 sq.fI. 0.96 acres SIDE YARD SETBACK; 101'1.
LOT 8 211.6:50 sq.ft. 0.68 acres LOT 211 :54,872 sq.ft. 0.80 acres -------- - --. - - MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 80 FT
LOT 9 47,272 sq.1f. 1.09 acres LOT 30 25,:54(} tSq.fI. 0.58 acretS R UN MINIMUM LOT DEP7H 160 FT
LOT 10 45.855 sq.ft. 1.05 acres LOT 31 26.752 sq.f/' 0.61 acres CO B E Street Width (Interior) 60' ROW
LOT 71 26,:511:5 sq.f~ 0.61 acres LOT 32 28,149 sq,fI. 0.65 acres RETAlIlING WALL
LOT 12 27,079 :sq.1f. 0.62 <<retS LOT 33 54,939 sq.fI. 1.26 acres
LOT 13 24,243 sq.f/. 0.56 acres LOT 34 62,153 sq.ft. 1.43 acres SHEEr NO. ./
LOT 14 21.134 sq. fl. 0.49 acrell LOT J5 23,284 sq.fI. 0.53 acres I 100' 200' 300' 1 ,.,..-
LOT 15 20,488 sq,(/. 0.47 acres LOT 36 24.419 sq.ft. 0.56 acres ' . I OF
SCALE IN FEET / 1