Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJanuary 02, 2024 Council PacketFE. Shakopee City Council January 2, 2024 7:00 PM City Hall, 485 Gorman St. Vision: Shakopee is a place where people want to be! A distinctive river town, with a multitude of business, cultural and recreational opportunities in a safe, welcoming and attractive environment for residents and visitors. Mission: Our mission is to deliver high quality services essential to maintaining a safe and sustainable community. We commit to doing this cost-effectively, with integrity and transparency. Key strategies: 1. Financial stability 2. Enhancing community strengths 3. Effective public services 4. Communication Mayor Matt Lehman presiding 1. Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Consent Business - (All items listed in this section are anticipated to be routine. After a discussion by the Mayor there will be an opportunity for members of the Council to remove any items from the consent agenda for individual discussion. Those items removed will be considered following the Public hearing portion of the agenda. Items remaining on the Consent Agenda will not be discussed and will be approved in one motion.) A. Administration *4. A.1. *City Council Minutes *4. A.2. *Designate individuals authorized to perform certain banking transactions *4. A.3. *Designation of Official Newspaper B. Engineering *4. B.1. *2024 Tree Pruning Contract *4. B.2. *Cooperative Maintenance Agreement - Traffic Signals C. Planning and Development *4. C.1. *Set Public Hearing Date for Proposed Vacation of Public Sanitary Sewer Easement Page 1 of 213 *4. C.2. *Set Public Hearing Date for Proposed Vacation of Sommerville Street Right -of -Way *4. C.3. *Award of Contract to 106 Group for Creation of the Shakopee Riverfront Cultural Area National Register District D. Police *4. D.1. *Surplus Property *4. D.2. *Captain Appointment 5. RECOGNITION OF INVOLVED RESIDENTS BY CITY COUNCIL- Provides an opportunity for the public to address the Council on items which are not on the agenda. Comments should not be more than five minutes in length. The Mayor may adjust that time limit based upon the number of persons seeking to comment. This comment period may not be used to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to make political endorsements or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with citizens, and questions from Council will be for clarification only. This period will not be used to problem solve issues or to react to the comments made, but rather for informational purposes only. 6. Business removed from consent will be discussed at this time 7. Recess for Economic Development Authority Meeting 8. Reconvene 9. General Business A. Administration 9. A.1. Discuss Partnership with CDA on Affordable Housing Funds 10. Workshop 10.A2023 Community Survey Update 11. Reports 11.A.City Bill List 11.B.Liaison and Administration 12. Other Business 13. Closed Session to discuss Labor Negotiations according to MN Statutes 13D.03, subd. (b) 13.A.Closed session to discuss union negotiations 14. Adjournment to Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 7 p.m. Page 2 of 213 *4.A.1. Shakopee City Council January 2, 2024 FROM: Lori J. Hensen, City Clerk TO: Mayor and Council Members Subject: City Council minutes from December 19, 2023. Policy/Action Requested: Approve the minutes of December 19, 2023. Recommendation: Approve the minutes of December 19, 2023. Discussion: Budget Impact: ATTACHMENTS: a December 19, 2023 Page 3 of 213 Shakopee City Council Minutes December 19, 2023 7:00 PM City Hall, 485 Gorman St. Mayor Matt Lehman presiding 1. Ro11 Ca11 Present: Mayor Matt Lehman, Council Members Jay Whiting, Angelica Contreras, Jim DuLaney, Jesse Lara Staff Present: City Administrator Bill Reynolds, Assistant City Administrator Chelsea Petersen, City Attorney Jim Tomson, Finance Director Nate Reinhardt, City Engineer Alex Jordan, City Clerk Lori Hensen, Planning/Development Director Michael Kerski, Public Works Director Bill Egan, Human Resources Director Alissa Frey 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of Agenda Reynolds 9.A.3. remove from agenda to be brought back at a later date. Council Member Jesse Lara made a motion to approve the modified agenda, second by Council Member Jay Whiting and the motion passed. 5-0 4. Consent Business - (All items listed in this section are anticipated to be routine. After a discussion by the Mayor there will be an opportunity for members of the Council to remove any items from the consent agenda for individual discussion. Those items removed will be considered following the Public hearing portion of the agenda. Items remaining on the Consent Agenda will not be discussed and will be approved in one motion.) Council Member Angelica Contreras made a motion to approve the consent agenda, second by Council Member Jim DuLaney and the motion passed. 5-0 A. Administration *4. A.1. *City Council Minutes Approve the minutes of December 5, 2023. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) *4. A.2. *2024 Fee Schedule Page 4of213 Adopt Ordinance 02023-016, establishing fees for 2024. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) *4. A.3. *Monthly Financial Review - November 2023 Review of November 2023 General Fund revenues and expenditures, and Community Center, Ice Arena and SandVenture year -over -year comparison. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) *4. A.4. *Approve Pawnbroker License Renewals for 2024 Approve a Pawnbroker Business License Renewal for Excel Pawn Inc. dba Excel Pawn & Jewelry. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) Approve a Pawnbroker License Renewal for Pawn Xchange LLC. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) *4. A.5. *Approve a Tobacco License for JNS Liquors dba Southbridge Liquor Approve a tobacco license for JNS Liquors dba Southbridge Liquor, located at 8071 Old Carriage Court North. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) *4. A.6. *Scott County Public Health's Statewide Health Improvement Partnership Grant Application Adopt Resolution R2023-153, approving an application to the Scott County Public Health's Statewide Health Improvement Partnership (SHIP) grant. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) *4. A.7. *Donation of N-95 Masks Adopt Resolution R2023-154, accepting a donation of surplus N-95 masks. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) *4. A.8. *2023 Miscellaneous Donations Accept Resolution R2023-156, a resolution accepting the gifts and donations received from outside organizations as presented. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) B. Engineering *4. B.1. *Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Bidding for Eagle Creek/Vierling Drive Roundabout Project Adopt Resolution R2023-149, approving plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for bids for the Eagle Creek Boulevard and Vierling Drive Roundabout Project, CIF-23-014. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) *4. B.2. *Lateral Sewer Connection Charge for the West End Lower Bluff Utility Extension Project Page of 213 Adopt Ordinance 02023-017, amending the City's Fee Schedule by adding lateral sanitary sewer connection charges for the West End Lower Bluff Utility Extension Project Sewer-24-001. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) *4. B.3. *Engineering Project Coordinator Promotion Approve the promotion of Alex Enyi to Engineering Project Coordinator, Pay Grade 180, Step 7 ($102,190, Exempt). (Motion was carried under consent agenda) *4. B.4. *Professional Engineering Consultant Pool Extension Adopt Resolution R2023-151, extending the term of the preapproved professional engineering firms for 2021, 2022 and 2023. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) *4. B.S. *Eagle Creek Boulevard and Vierling Drive Intersection Improvements - Authorize Condemnation Initiation Adopt Resolution R2023-150, authorizing the initiation of potential quick -take condemnation for the Eagle Creek Boulevard and Vierling Drive intersection improvements, CIF-20-014. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) C. Fire *4. C.1. *Surplus Property The Fire Department is seeking Council approval to declare SCBA equipment which includes 13 air packs, 19 air bottles, and 20 face pieces surplus property and authorize their sale to the City of Manchester, MN for the amount of $14,200. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) D. Parks and Recreation *4. D.1. Acceptance of Donations and Sponsorship Funds Approved Resolution R2023-157, accepting Donation and Sponsorship Funds for Recreation Programs and Donations from the Heart. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) E. Planning and Development *4. E.1. *Resolution Accepting Grants for Fitness Court in the Amount of $90,000 Approve Resolution R2023-155 accepting donations in the amount of $90,000 for the construction of a Fitness Court in Scenic Heights Park. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) *4. E.2. *Contract with HTPO for Pickeeball Designs for Scenic Heights Park Approve contract with HTPO for $42,200 for Pickelball Court Designs along with associated engineering needs including storm water, survey and oversight. (Motion Page 8of213 was carried under consent agenda) *4. E.3. *Playground Purchase and Installation for SandVenture with Kompan Approve contract with Kompan using the OMNIA Purchasing Contract for a playground at SandVenture in the amount of $92,964.80 including installation. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) *4. E.4. *SBA Lender Agreement for Tommy's Malt Shop at SandVenture Approve Acceptance of SBA Lender's Agreement for Tommy's Malt Shop. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) *4. E.S. *Contract with Confluence for Jackson Commons Designs Approve a contract with Confluence for an amount not to exceed $255,750 for construction plans for Jackson Commons Park. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) *4. E.6. *Acceptance of Grant from State of Minnesota for Building Official Training Grant Adopt Resolution R2023-152 accepting grant and authorizing the hiring of a Building Inspector Apprentice in the 2024 budget (Motion was carried under consent agenda) F. Police *4. F.1. *Surplus Property Declare two firearms as surplus property and authorize disposal. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) G. Public Works *4. G.1. *Vehicle and Equipment Purchases Approve the purchase of four John Deere mowers and equipment from Kibble Equipment and Midwest Machinery Co., in the total amount of $86,650.96; one Ford cargo van from Morrie's Buffalo Ford in the amount of $66,771.04; John Deere Gator from Kibble Equipment in the amount of $5,566.20, Sportsraq G.P.S paint striper from Tragnology North America in the total amount of $63,100.85; and the declaration of equipment as surplus. (Motion was carried under consent agenda) 5. RECOGNITION OF INVOLVED RESIDENTS BY CITY COUNCIL - Provides an opportunity for the public to address the Council on items which are not on the agenda. Comments should not be more than five minutes in length. The Mayor may adjust that time limit based upon the number of persons seeking to comment. This comment period may not be used to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to make political endorsements or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with citizens, and questions from Council will be for clarification only. This period will not be used to problem solve issues or to Page of@13 react to the comments made, but rather for informational purposes only. 6. Business removed from consent will be discussed at this time 7. Recess for Economic Development Authority Meeting Council Member Jim DuLaney made a motion to recess to the EDA, second by Council Member Jesse Lara and the motion passed. 5-0 8. Reconvene 9. General Business A. Administration 9. A.1.2024 EDA Special Benefit Levy and Budget Council Member Jay Whiting made a motion to adopt Resolution R2023-146 approving the proposed special benefit levy of the EDA of $500,000 collectible in 2024., second by Council Member Angelica Contreras and the motion passed. 3-2 Nays: DuLaney, Lehman 9. A.2. Approval of the 2024 Property Tax Levy and the 2024 Annual Budget Council Member Jay Whiting made a Motion to call the question, second by Council Member Jesse Lara and the motion passed. 4-1 Nays: Lehman Council Member Jay Whiting made a motion to adopt Resolution R2023-147 and R2023-148, approving the property tax levy collectible in 2024 and the 2024 annual budget, second by Council Member Jesse Lara and the motion passed. 5-0 9. A.3. Discuss Partnership with CDA on Affordable Housing Funds Removed from the agenda 10. Reports 10.A. City Bill List Informational only 10.B. Liaison & Administration Reports Informational only Page 8of@13 11. Other Business 12. Closed Session to discuss Labor Negotiations according to MN Statutes 13D.03, subd. (b) 12.A. Closed session to discuss union negotiations Council Member Jay Whiting made a motion to recess to closed session to discuss labor union negotiations according to MN Statutes 13D.03 subd. (b), second by Council Member Angelica Contreras and the motion passed. 5-0 13. Adjournment to Tuesday, January 2, 2024, at 7 p.m. Council Member Jay Whiting made a motion to adjourn to Tuesday, January 2, 2024, at 7:00 p.m., second by Council Member Angelica Contreras and the motion passed. 5 - 0 Page 8of f313 *4.A.2. Shakopee City Council January 2, 2024 FROM: Nate Reinhardt, Finance Director TO: Mayor and Council Members Subject: Resolution designating individuals authorized to perform certain banking transactions. Policy/Action Requested: Adopt Resolution R2024-001, a resolution designating individuals authorized to perform certain banking transactions. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council on an annual basis authorize individuals to sign city checks and perfotur certain financial transactions and designate financial institutions to serve as depositories. Discussion: This resolution does not change the current authorized positions who are designated to perform investing and banking transactions. Currently the Mayor and Finance Director sign all checks. While not legally required, it is considered a best practice to formally adopt a resolution of authorized individuals annually. Additionally, banks often require a formal action of the City Council recognizing the staff authorized to sign checks and authorize certain bank transactions. The attached resolution also identifies the authorized depositories for City funds. This includes banks the City works with on a regular basis as well as those that may become a depository during the fiscal year. All brokers must file an appropriate Broker Certification Form, a requirement of Minnesota Statutes, to transact business with the City of Shakopee. All documentation is reviewed by the City's auditors during the financial audit each year. The resolution will become effective with adoption. Budget Impact: There is no direct financial impact on the City. Page 10 of 213 ATTACHMENTS: a R2024-001 Annual Authorized Signer Resolution Page 11 of 213 RESOLUTION R2024-001 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING INDIVIDUALS AUTHORIZED TO PERFORM CERTAIN BANK TRANSACTIONS WHEREAS, Old National Bank is designated as a depository of city funds; and WHEREAS, the following named institutions and brokers are hereby designated as additional depositories allowable for investment purposes; a. U.S. Bank; b. RBC Capital Markets, LLC; c. Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund (4M Fund); d. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc; e. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC; f. Moreton Capital Markets, LLC; g. HomeTown Bank. WHEREAS, U.S. Bank Institutional Trust Services is hereby designated as the safekeeping depository for investment instruments in the City's investment portfolio and as clearinghouse for the City's investment portfolio transactions. WHEREAS, the city must designate individuals authorized to sign checks, transfer funds and approve transactions on behalf of the city; WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute Section 471.38 allows the use of electronic funds transfer, provided certain policy controls are in place, including that the governing body annually delegates the authority to the appropriate individual, for the following types of payments: a. for a claim for a payment from an imprest payroll bank account or investment of excess money; b. for a payment of tax or aid anticipation certificates; c. for a payment of contributions to pension or retirement fund; d. for vendor payments; and e. for payment of bond principal, bond interest and a fiscal agent service charge. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: that checks, drafts or other withdrawal orders issued against the funds of the city on deposit with said bank shall be signed by both Matt Lehman, Mayor and Nathan Reinhardt, Finance Director. Page 12 of 213 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that William Reynolds, City Administrator, Nathan Reinhardt, Finance Director, Melissa Schlingman, Accounting Manager, Kimberly Weckman, Accounting Clerk, are authorized to act for the City in all of its business activities including investments, payroll withholdings, electronic funds transfers, debt service payments and other banking transactions as deemed appropriate. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Alissa Frey, HR Director, Patti Kent, HR Specialist, and Jaime Nelson, HR Specialist are authorized to act for the City in banking transactions related to payroll including payroll withholdings and payments of payroll and related costs. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that effective January 1, 2024 this Resolution supersedes all prior and conflicting resolutions, including Resolution No. R2022-145. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this 2nd day of January 2024. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Page 13 of 213 *4.A.3. Shakopee City Council January 2, 2024 FROM: Lori J. Hensen, City Clerk TO: Mayor and Council Members Subj ect: Designation of the Official Newspaper for 2024, and Website for transportation project notice purposes in 2024 Policy/Action Requested: Designate the Shakopee Valley News as the official newspaper for the City of Shakopee in 2024, and designate the city website (www ShakopeeMN.gov) as the official notice and advertisement venue for transportation project bids in 2024. Recommendation: Approval of the requested action. Discussion: State statute (MN Stats. Ch. 331A) requires the city to designate an official newspaper to publish certain matters over the course of the year. This includes council minutes, ordinances, resolutions when required by law, notices of public hearings on planning matters and public improvement projects and advertisement for bids. To be qualified as a medium for the official and legal publication, a newspaper must meet certain minimum qualifications which include for the city's purposes being printed in English; distributed at least twice a month; circulated in the city and regularly delivered to at least 400 residents; have its office in Scott or a neighboring county, and file a copy of each issue with the State Historical Society. Under the state criteria, the Shakopee Valley News is the only viable option. In addition, state statute (MN Stats. Ch. 331A.12) allows the designation of a city's website as the official notice venue for transportation projects. Publication on the website may be used in place of any other required form of publication. To comply with state statutes, the city must publish in a qualified newspaper in the city and on the website, notice that the city Page 14 of 213 will publish any future advertisements for bids on the city site. All notices under this section must be posted in substantially the same format and for the same period of time as required for publication in an official newspaper, and ensure that a permanent record of publication is maintained in a form accessible by the public. Budget Impact: The Shakopee Valley News currently charges $7.68 per column inch to the city. This will be increased to $8.06 per column inch in 2024, which is a 5% increase to the rate charged in 2022. Staff will continue to review cost saving options due to the increased costs associated with printing. There is no additional expense for publishing transportation bid information on our website. ATTACWVIENTS: o S VN Letter Page 15 of 213 SHAKOPEE VALLEYNEWS December 19, 2023 Mr. William Reynolds, City Administrator City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mr. Reynolds, Please consider our request for appointment of the Shakopee Valley News as the official newspaper for the City of Shakopee in 2024. We feel very strongly that the publishing of legal notices in the newspaper is of vital importance to local residents who wish to stay informed about the decisions being made by your elected body. The rate submitted by the Shakopee Valley News for 2024 is $8.06 per column inch. The new rate reflects a 5 percent increase from that charged in 2023 and is needed to cover the rising costs for paper and labor, in addition to several postal increases initiated by the U.S. Postal Service over a 14-month period of time. Notices submitted by the City of Shakopee will continue to be posted on our newspaper website, www.shakopeenews.com and the Minnesota Newspaper Association's statewide public notice website, mnpublicnotice.com, free of charge. The legal notice deadline for the Shakopee Valley News is at noon on Monday, preceding the fol- lowing week's publication date; during holiday weeks the deadline may be advanced. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you in the past. We hope that relationship can be continued in the coming year. Respectfully, Laurie A. Hartmann General Manager Shakopee Valley News 1221 East Fourth Avenue, Suite 155, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 ■ (952) 445-3333 Page 16 of 213 *4.B.1. Shakopee City Council January 2, 2024 FROM: Kirby Templin, Water Resource/Environmental Engineer TO: Mayor and Council Members Subject: 2024 Tree Pruning Contract Extension Policy/Action Requested: Approve a contract with Precision Landscape and Tree in the amount of $119.10 per hour for the 2024 tree pruning project. Recommendation: Approval as requested. Discussion: The city hired Precision Landscape and Tree to complete tree pruning in 2022. That contract agreement has a provision to extend the contract for up to two additional years at the city's sole discretion. Based on the quote and the satisfactory of work performed in 2022 and 2023, it is recommended to extend the pruning contract with Precision Landscape and Tree for 2024 which would be the last year the contract can be extended. Precision Landscape and Tree from Little Canada, Minnesota, has the capacity and experience for the work and are prepared to begin the work in January 2024 with a completion date of December 31, 2024. The 2024 hourly rate is $119.10 which is the 2023 rate ($117.70 per hour) adjusted by 1.2%. The proposed rate adjustment is within the allowable increase per the contract to account for inflation. See attached for the 2022 quote tabulation. It should be noted that one of the city's contract requirements prescribes that only an ISA Certified Arborist may perform pruning and that all ANSI standards shall be met while performing work. Additionally, the contractor is required to notify adjacent property owners of the activity in their area a minimum of 48 hours in advance, with a letter provided by the city. Page 17 of 213 The trees proposed to be pruned in 2024 include the mature trees, young trees and general right-of-way clearance in Zone D, and only young trees in Zone A (see attached maps). Budget Impact: $55,000 is budgeted for the 2024 Tree Pruning project within the Parks Maintenance Operating Budget. ATTACHMENTS: O 2024 Contract Extension • 2022 Quote Tabulation o Figure - Zone D o Figure - Zone A Page 18 of 213 CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into this day of , 2024 by and between Precision Landscape and Tree, hereinafter called "Contractor", and the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "City." WITNESSETH: That Whereas, the Contractor has become the lowest responsible bidder for furnishing the supervision, labor, tools, equipment, materials and supplies and for constructing the following City improvements: 2024 TREE PRUNING NOW THEREFORE, the parties to this contract agree to the following: 1. Manner for Completion. The Contractor, at his own proper cost and expense, shall perform all work and furnish all supervision (needed beyond that provided by the City Engineer), labor, material, tools, supplies, machinery and other equipment necessary for the construction of the 2024 TREE PRUNING for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, in a workmanlike and substantial manner, as outlined in the Request For Quotation (RFQ). 2. Due Diligence. The maintenance of a rate of progress in the work which will result in its completion in a reasonable time, is an essential feature of this Contract, and the Contractor agrees to proceed with all due diligence and care, at all times to take all precautions to insure the time of completion as defined in this Contract. The Contractor shall fully complete the work called for under the Contract in accordance with the RFQ. 3. Payment. The City will pay the Contractor those prices stipulated in the Contractor's Quotation, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Contract, which shall constitute full and complete compensation for the contractor's work provided hereunder. The parties specifically agree and understand and the Contractor specifically waives any claim for additional compensation for any changed condition whether arising out of a physical condition at the site of an unusual nature, differing materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character and at the location provided for in the Contract or arising as a result of any force majeur. 4. Contractor's Responsibility for Subcontractors. It is further agreed that Contractor shall be as fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as Contractor is for the acts and omissions of persons it directly employs. Contractor shall cause appropriate provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts relating to this work, to bind all subcontractors to Contractor by all the terms herein set forth, insofar as applicable to the work of subcontractors and to give Contractor the same power regarding termination of any subcontract as the City may exercise over Contractor under any provisions of this contract. Nothing contained in this Contract shall create any contractual relation between the subcontractor and the City or between any subcontractors. 5. Payment to Subcontractors. The Contractor shall pay any subcontractor within ten days of receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. If City of Shakopee — Contract 2024 TREE PRUNING Page 19 of 213 Contract - Page 1 of 2 the Contractor fails to pay within ten days, the Contractor shall pay the subcontractor interest at the rate of one and one-half percent per month or part of month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor, in accordance with Minn. State. Sec. 471.425, Subd. 4a. 6. City Instructions. The City may declare the contract forfeited, should the Contractor persistently disregard instructions of the City or fail to observe or perform any provisions of this Contract. 9. Duplicate Originals. This Contract shall be executed in two copies; one (1) copy being retained by the City, one (1) to be delivered to the Contractor. 10. Nondiscrimination. The Contractor agrees in the performance of this Contract not to discriminate on the ground or because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation or age, against any employee of Contractor or applicant for employment, and shall include a similar provision in all subcontracts let or awarded hereunder 11. Jurisdiction. This agreement and every question arising hereunder shall be construed or determined according to the laws of the State of Minnesota. PRECISION LANDCAPE AND TREE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA By jaat,G�be�y By Matt Lehman/Mayor Josh Hielsberg, Sales Arborist By dv� 2dGe�¢ By Jason Groholski, Owner City of Shakopee — Contract 2024 TREE PRUNING Bill Reynolds/City Administrator Page 20 of 213 Contract - Page 2 of 2 City of Shakopee — Specifications 2022 TREE PRUNING Page 21 of 213 Appendix A - Page 1 of 1 Quotation Results 2022 Tree Pruning January 21, 2022 City of Shakopee Bidder Amount Precision Landscape and Tree $ 110.00 Shadywood Tree Experts $ 125.00 Ostvig Tree, Inc $ 128.00 Pro -Tree Outdoor Services $ 156.00 Page 22 of 213 EDEN PRAIRIE AINCIO3 N1d3NN3H lip 0 fig‘'�lll,,Illll/IlI%I/llli,,1, toOf w Illll rr % %I/I/II////0%% ai1f1111%,I' „f,, rrirri�llllllllllllll th,thp 1011 ir- / 1110!"111 Alllllll j /%r,l ti ice'`IIIIIIIIIIO%//Illli ";lllllll/I/llllllli� fllllllllllll101Gr�, WO �lllllll/I%Jill%i lllllll/IIIJf 11%llllilll�; '1llllllllllllllll%li, 0 f 011111/I/l%0///, rir°r'/f IIIIIIIIIII/I/ill /�lll/ll% r%ulllll/l/llll��, �� ill, lllllllllllllull '1 �IIIIIIIIlOI/%ll/lll�, , %,,0111101011%0% %-° llflf%; Fla � IIIII ;)JJ� � ,ill%I//I//%/ W11110 Jill„ �,llllll////I/I%I1;, 11JJJJ11111(((f(� tf011A lulllll//0ll//l�r lllllllll0/I/0l,' �1 % ...... lllllllllll/I%/1, �> ���� ioai rrriiiD, l//i% 0 lull �,,,,�00011I10I//l ia>,�lllllllllllllll ,' r0rr�a�,i�r�i �f l�l°°r°,1111111111111111I1i f fff/f/ff//fJ//1>ra�rir�i�� J(;i irrrrrrllr , , larraoir, , a ,/aa /iori ifti, ,;,luof l,�'a Ill, � ,/ 111[,}/oa��a, lllllllllllll i j ll0/ll//llll' 1/ r r r,%r ���lrl�lllll"Of����i„I�f„��i/�� a o N p J y C N N Q a)U O ,,/"' 2 c c O. CC D F N T FCC O i1Gf � . . 0 o O ,rl% 00%%%%%%%1l ai;; - %// i/;"%//O//O/%/G;!1t ia/%%%%%%%+Illlriq;;;;; ♦«... Other Q m U ❑ w � a)m m m m 0 c c c c c c N N N N N N SVI( •.; S VIO)IVQ OSUNMITAI Ian ©S IN 2 2 *4.B.2. Shakopee City Council January 2, 2024 FROM: Micah Heckman, Assistant City Engineer TO: Mayor and Council Members Subject: Agreement with Scott County for routine maintenance of city owned traffic signals Policy/Action Requested: Approve a Cooperative Maintenance Agreement between Scott County and the City of Shakopee for city owned traffic signals. Recommendation: Approval of the agreement. Discussion: The city currently owns and operates three (3) traffic signal systems at the Old Carriage Court/Southbridge Parkway, Vierling Drive/Tasha Boulevard and Vierling Drive/Heather Street intersections. City staff does not have the expertise or experience performing routine maintenance on these signal systems. Routine maintenance includes, but is not limited to, annual preventative maintenance, modifying existing signal timing plans to address observed operational issues, updating signal component firmware, replacing failed pedestrian and vehicle signal indicators, and repairing/replacing Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) devices. Scott County and the City of Shakopee do not currently have a cooperative maintenance agreement for the traffic signal systems but Scott County has been assisting with the required maintenance without a foiiiial agreement. This agreement codifies the routine maintenance tasks for all three (3) intersections. Budget Impact: There is no budget impact as a result of this agreement. Scott County currently performs routine maintenance on the three (3) city owned traffic signals and the cost is budgeted for in the Street Maintenance budget. Upon execution of this agreement, routine maintenance will continue to be paid out of the Street Maintenance budget. Page 25 of 213 ATTACHMENTS: a Cooperative Maintenance Agreement Page 26 of 213 City of Shakopee County of Scott COOPERATIVE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, is entered by and between the County of Scott, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County" and the City of Shakopee, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City". RECITALS: A. City currently owns and operates three (3) existing traffic signals at the Vierling Drive/Tasha Boulevard, Vierling Drive/Heather Street, and Southbridge Parkway/Old Carriage Court intersections (hereinafter referred to as the "Signals"). B. County currently assists City in providing routine maintenance of the Signals. C. County and City currently have a cooperative maintenance agreement that addresses County management of signal operations at the Southbridge Parkway/Old Carriage Court intersection. D. County and City agree it is in the best interest of the traveling public that routine maintenance of the Signals is provided by the County. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED: 1. The recitals above are hereby restated and incorporated herein. 2. This agreement shall apply to routine signal maintenance only. It does not apply to the integral street lights/luminaires at the Signals. City shall maintain the integral streetlights including the luminaire and all its components at the sole cost and expense of the City. 3. County shall perform routine maintenance of the Signals subject to City oversight. County routine maintenance shall include performing an annual preventative maintenance review of the Signals, modifying existing signal phase timing to address observed intersection operational issues, updating signal component firmware, replacing failed pedestrian and vehicle signal indications, repairing and/or replacing Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) devices, repairing and/or replacing signal or electrical components determined to be causing operational issues, and other routine maintenance required to provide satisfactory operation of the Signals. County shall obtain written City approval prior to performing routine maintenance work anticipated to cost five thousand dollars ($5,000) or more. 4. City shall perform major maintenance of the Signals including development of signal timing plans, painting of poles and mast arms, planned signal cabinet, pole and mast arm replacement, signal cabinet, pole and/or 1 Page 27 of 213 City of Shakopee County of Scott mast ann repairs due to wind, vehicle or other source induced damage, maintenance or replacement of loop detection devices and other maintenance the County determines is not routine maintenance. 5. City shall be responsible for providing initial response when any of the Signals default into a failure mode of operation. City shall be responsible for responding to signal repairs outside of normal working hours. Normal working hours shall be defined to be from 7:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. County holidays that occur on Monday through Friday shall not be considered normal working hours. 6. If routine maintenance is performed and costs are incurred, City shall reimburse County quarterly. City payment to County shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of a proper invoice from County. 7. This agreement does not include maintenance of any other Signal system hardware, which shall remain a City responsibility. 8. The City shall provide the electrical energy for the operation of the traffic control signal system and integral street lights, all at the sole cost and expense of the City. 9. City shall be responsible for all striping and markings at the Signalized intersections. 10. Either party may terminate this agreement upon sixty (60) days written notice to the other party. 11. Since each party is a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, each party shall maintain general liability and automobile liability coverage protecting itself, its officers, agents, employees and duly authorized volunteers against any usual and customary public liability claims to the limits prescribed under Minn. Stat. Sec. 466.04 and Workers' Compensation in accordance with the Minnesota statutory requirements. Said policies shall be kept in effect during the entire term of this Agreement. 12. All records kept by the City and the County with respect to this Agreement shall be subject to examination by the representatives of each party. All data collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose by the activities of the County or City pursuant to this Agreement shall be governed by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as amended, and the Minnesota Rules implementing such Act now in force or hereafter adopted. 13. Neither party, its officers, agents or employees, either in their individual or official capacity, shall be responsible or liable in any manner to the other party for any claim, demand, action or cause of action of any kind or character arising out of, allegedly arising out of or by reason of the performance, negligent performance or nonperformance of the described maintenance, restoration, repair or replacement work by the other party, or arising out of the negligence of any contractor under any contract let by the other party for the performance of said work; and each party agrees to defend, save, keep and hold harmless the other, its officers, agents and employees harmless from all claims, demands, actions or causes of action arising out of negligent performance by its officers, agents or employees. 2 Page 28 of 213 City of Shakopee County of Scott 14. It is further agreed that neither party to this Agreement shall be responsible or liable to the other or to any other person or entity for any claims, damages, actions, or causes of actions of any kind or character arising out of, allegedly arising out of or by reason of the performance, negligent performance or nonperformance of any work or part hereof by the other as provided herein; and each party further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense and indemnify the other party for any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising in connection with or by virtue of performance of its own work as provided herein. Each party's obligation to indemnify the other under this clause shall be limited in accordance with the statutory tort liability limitation as set forth in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466.04 to limit each party's total liability for all claims arising from a single occurrence, include the other party's claim for indemnification, to the limits prescribed under 466.04. It is further understood and agreed that the Parties' total liability shall be limited by Minnesota Statute Section 471.59, Subdivision 1(a) as a single governmental unit. 15. It is further agreed that any and all employees of each party and all other persons engaged by a party in the performance of any work or services required or provided herein to be performed by the party shall not be considered employees, agents or independent contractors of the other party, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged shall be the sole responsibility of the employing party and shall not be the obligation or responsibility of the other party. 16. The provisions of Minn. Stat. Sec. 181.59 and of any applicable local ordinance relating to Civil Rights and discrimination and the affirmative action policy statement of Scott County shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. 17. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. Sec. 16C.05, subd. 5, the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the County and City pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to examination by the County, City and the State Auditor. Complete and accurate records of the work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be kept by the County and City for a minimum of six (6) years following termination of this Agreement for such auditing purposes. The retention period shall be automatically extended during the course of any administrative or judicial action involving the County or the City regarding matters to which the records are relevant. The retention period shall be automatically extended until the administrative or judicial action is finally completed or until the authorized agent of the County or City notifies each party in writing that the records no longer need to be kept. 3 Page 29 of 213 City of Shakopee County of Scott 18. The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations between the parties and performance under it. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation hereunder shall be those courts located with the County of Scott, State of Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involving the parties shall be in the appropriate federal court within the State of Minnesota. 19. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid and unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall be valid and binding upon the parties unless such invalidity or non -enforceability would cause the Agreement to fail its purpose. One or more waivers by either party of any provision, term, condition or covenant shall not be construed by the other party as a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same by the other party. 20. The County's Authorized Agent for the purpose of the administration of this Agreement is Mark Callahan, Traffic Engineer, or his successor. His current address and phone number are Scott County Government Center, 200 Fourth Avenue West, Shakopee, MN 55379, (952) 496-8367. 21. The City's Authorized Agent for the purpose of the administration of this Agreement is Alex Jordan, City Engineer or his successor. His current address and phone number are 485 Gorman Street, Shakopee, MN 55379, (952) 233-9361. Any change in name, address, or telephone shall be noticed to the other party. 4 Page 30 of 213 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF SHAKOPEE By Ma Date • o ot Sian - via Adose Si electronic si ill se sent n to collect natures. a And Date Wil o ot Sisn - via Adobe Si electronic si a ill se sent n to collect natures. a COUNTY OF SCOTT By Le'2- Date o ot Sion - ill be sent via Adobe Sion to collect electronic si natures. • Upon proper execution, this agreement will be legally valid and binding. By Jear o ot Sign - ill be sent via A obe Sign to collect electronic signatures. RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL: By Antho Date Date o ot Sion - ill be sent via Adobe Skin to collect electronic signatures. Page 31 of 213 *4.C.1. Shakopee City Council January 2, 2024 FROM: Amanda Schwabe, Planner TO: Mayor and Council Members Subject: *Set Public Hearing Date for Proposed Vacation of Public Sanitary Sewer Easement Policy/Action Requested: Adopt Resolution R2024-002 setting the public hearing date for vacation of a public sanitary sewer easement on PID 270550051. Recommendation: Approve the action requested. Discussion: Site Information: Site Address: 550 Valley Park Drive Zoning: I-2 (Heavy Industry) Comp Plan: Mixed Use Employment Center Property Owner: Brambilla Family Limited Liability Limited Partnership No. 1 Applicant: Bryce Huemoeller of Huemoeller, Gontarek and Cheskis, PLC Discussion: Bryce Huemoeller of Huemoeller, Gontarek & Cheskis, PLC on behalf of the property owner, Brambilla Family Limited Liability Limited Partnership No 1, is requesting a vacation of a sanitary sewer easement on property at 550 Valley Park Drive. The easement is 35 feet wide and runs west to east parallel to the north property line on this 10.13 acre parcel. The easement was established by Quit Claim Deed dated August 10, 1973, filed August 22, 1973 as document T11939, in favor of The Metropolitan Sewer District Board. The easement was transferred initially to the Metropolitan Council and subsequently to the City of Shakopee by Agreement, dated January 11, 2007, as amended by Agreement, dated May 25, 2012. Per the applicant, allowing the subject easement to remain constitutes a title defect which is Page 32 of 213 required to be completed to finalize a pending sale of the property. The attached Resolution R2024-002 sets a public hearing date of Tuesday, January 16, 2024, to consider the vacation of the public sanitary sewer easement. On that date, comments from staff members and utilities, as well as a recommendation from the Planning Commission, will be presented to the City Council for consideration. The Planning Commission will consider the request at its January 4, 2024 meeting. Budget Impact: N/A ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution R2024-002 • Site Aerial • Easement Vacation Sketch • Applicant Narrative • Engineering Memo Page 33 of 213 RESOLUTION R2024-002 A RESOLUTION SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF A CERTAIN PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT LOCATED ON 550 VALLEY PARK DRIVE (PID 270550051) WHEREAS, Bryce Huemoeller of Huemoeller, Gontarek and Cheskis, PLC, on behalf of the property owner Brambilla Family Limited Liability Limited Partnership No. 1, has made application proposing the vacation of a certain public sanitary sewer easement at 550 Valley Park Drive; and WHEREAS, it has been presented to the Shakopee City Council that a certain sanitary sewer easement recorded as Document Number T11939 on PID 270550051, is no longer of public use or interest; and WHEREAS, a public hearing must be held before an action to vacate can be taken and two weeks published and posted notice thereof must be given; and WHEREAS, the proposed vacation is a 35-foot wide sanitary sewer easement as depicted on Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, two weeks published notice will be given in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS and posted notice will be given by posting such notice on the bulletin board in the Shakopee City Hall. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that a hearing be held in the Council Chambers on the 16th day of January 2024, at 7:00 p.m. or thereafter, on the matter of the vacation of a certain public sanitary sewer easement depicted in Exhibit A. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the 2nd day of January, 2024. ATTEST: Lori Hensen, City Clerk Mayor of the City of Shakopee Page 34 of 213 r j ; / EXHIBIT A IT.HTT7.171 ;;47)17 1117 T 11.1.00" tl IP NI it n, ..rrrerTrThrr . hregmtrbrrtror.tr,rtrmr, 4 Page 35 of 213 Shakopee Municipal Boundary 1111 00111, 0000,0000,000110110111011110,1,,, '111'1011100011110000000000 000011111111111001111111110,0000,000,000100,00100100. 11111,1110011100,01010,11,,,, 11111111111111111111111IIIIII'llo 111111111 II, 111111111111,1 11111001101I1111111 0010000000,01011111100,„000 1111111 io,,,00y,yyyyyyyyyyyyy00000000000000000000000000000000000,y,, 111111111111111111111 „1101,11111,1„1,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,1„11111111111111111111111111106u1 „00111,111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111100yll 1,11111011 00JI100011,10H Agri' SFIAKOPEE December 26, 2023 1111111111 1,011111111111111111111111111111111 111 11",,,i1,011111' poill 11 .1_11 1111'111111111 11111 ,11,110 „ 11000000001011r111111.1.00trotrr.,,,„1„,„ 000,00010111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111Er" 01,1,0111111110001111111101111,,,,,, 111111111111111111 fffl0Yryto 00111111111111111111,01,000 111111111101101ophol volor000frosfel,(/# 11011161000000111111111110 04,„„4 004, 00,0dry/fe, litiMe#1(iii,y,„,1111111111111 4 gi 11, ff 11111111111111 1000000v111111111,,,,,,11111111111111111,1 000ortre,, 1111 Easement to be Vacated Ili 111111111111111111110, 1 11111 1,11,11,11,1111111°p1111111111,1111,11111111°,111,1,11001:11100001111? )1111111,011111111,11111,011111111111111111111111111 10001010111111111111 11111111111111111111 11111111111 111 111111111 111111111111111111111111111111,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I1,11111,I,I,I,11111111111111111111P 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 ''''°1IIII°1,1°101°1111111111111 °I, 1!0\1100110110111110011111001,10111111101,01,11,,,,,,,,0000000,,,,, 1 III 111111111'111111, '11:,,,,,11111111110110111111111111111111II 1, IIIII°I°I''I''iiiilIlliIllIllIllIl°°ll,„II,,,10'1° 011110001000010000c g 1110 0°10"1 10101 01111* "11,001•01100 HI 010 1111 11 1 1)0 11 111111111111111111111111111111110( 00000,0000000,0111110001111000111040011 L00,11 11 I 4,000,1111 I, 101011110000111011111111111 100 „ 1,11111,11 1111111111111111111111111111 Ill1111111l1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 000000000000000111,10 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1„,,1111111,00000000000000000000000000000000000,,,,,,,,,Nouneueneuelooneueneuelooloor 1„,01, 1, 0111 110 1,01111 111 11'1111111111,11111,1111111,111111111111,,,,, 11111111,11,111,1111111,11 1 III 1 1' ,1,11111 1111l1 1111 bet 10 1W7111#411 1111111111111 I 11I,1,11111 550 Valley Park Drive Page 36 of 213 1111111111,11,11,:,, 1001011111,11110,1,1101,000„ 1111111 00110 111111111111011101000011000000000000011'1°1110 ,1,11110001111111000IIIIIIII00000 10,01,01,0111,0001 10000 111111111100,,,,, II.0.,111110I11011111111111101,1011 11 ire 10110111111111119 11 110 1100100000010y 0111 0111 irpo 0‘0,0„,000 0,10,,„'00400,0400 10111111111111111111111 0000,111111,00i000°100000 '10000,10110011000000000 110 1 11 $00010A0 1000 0 10, 1 „,)12Zy111 A 0100000, 1 0 Ill 100 4t,c1,11111 ,1 1 11' ,1,11111111111111114 00001000010010111111010 00000100101,1. 101111111111111111 01010111111111111111111 01 000100110 111111111111111111101 ' 1111111111 in ill111111111,l1l111 11111111 11,11111110111 11111111 1111111,11 111111 11111111111111111111111111111111,111:111111111111,1111,11,111,1,111,1,111,111,111,1111,11111,11111,1111 ,1111,1111,11111111111,1i1,11,11,111,11,11,111111111,1I 11111,110111„111111111,1111 1110111111111111111111'11 01,611,111,0100„0„0„00„00001„000„000„00„y0,q,0,,1,00 11,01110:1011111111,111111?1 1 H111i11l1l11?1111111?11111111111?1I11I11?1I11I11?1I11I111110111111111111111111111111111111011111111011011111011111101111 ,,111 1 111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 01111,111 11, 001 1111 1111111'1'1'1'11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11 „,,0y 111111111,11,1,1,1,1,1,111111111111111 1,1'1IIII11111111101111,1000 '11"111111111'111111 1101111011111111111111111, ''111, 111111111111.. 1 I 11111111111111111nr1111111110,0000000 ,, 11111111111111111111111111 111,111 11 III n1111111111 1;101I,, °,,,,,11111111'1 11111'1111111111111111111111 11 ,1,1111, 1111111111111111111 0011111111111111111111100,0 111111 1,101.10,, 111111,11 1111111111 0 0.0175 0.035 mi Now or Formerly: rr,at ammrz uv m� xwssoiaa Cr PMwP PRPPPPRP-. I / 1 / 1 / / / / 1 / 1 1 / 1 / I /1 -x/aer,,.A7, /4Is el7x0. } 51,149 5O, F/1 5P VAtISP PAY PAW (PPSI[P) Now or Formerly'. Malt/ PAY I70 SNAPP 11 IAYa Maeda Now or Fomnr/y: agLvf.A 1441,X I RVA' IIIEYP/F:t ,llaa,4 lxa IAY1N1A4te Page 37 of 213 BLOCK 4 11111111) 111111111 101!PI01Iuk,P[ The Sewer Easement was transferred initially to the Metropolitan Council and subsequently to the City of Shakopee by Agreement, dated January 11, 2007, as amended by Agreement, dated May 25,2012. The City Engineer has affirmed that the Sewer Easement is not currently in use and the properties it was intended to serve are now permanently connected by alternate accesses to the main interceptor pipe. The vacation of the Sewer Easement is in the public interest because it is no longer needed for a public purpose and interferes with the full use of Lot 1, since a portion of the Brambilla building is located over the Sewer Easement and the easement constitutes a title defect that needs to be corrected to complete a pending sale the sale of the property.. The applicant recommends that as a courtesy the Metropolitan Council be notified of this proceeding and the findings reflect that appropriate notice was given. Page 38 of 213 City of Shakopee Memorandum TO: Amanda Schwabe, Planner FROM: Darin Manning, Project Engineer SUBJECT: Vacation of Public Sanitary Sewer Easement PROJECT NO.: VACA-000182-2023 DATE: December 19, 2023 The application indicates a request to vacate a public sanitary sewer easement. The reason for this request is to clean up outdated information as the sanitary sewer easement is no longer needed for public purposes. The Engineering Department has completed its review of the vacation request and offers the following comments at this time for the applicant and for the planning department: 1. Conduct a title search to confirm other interest from utility holders in any existing/underlying easements on the property. 2. There is an existing stormwater, drainage, and ponding easement located within the sanitary sewer easement proposed to be vacated. This easement must remain. Recommendation Should the City recommend approval of this request, the Engineering Department suggests the items listed above be attached as conditions of the approval. C:\Program Files(x86)\neevia.com\docConverterPro\temp\NVDC\2118AA86-0288-4FBA-810B- 3 F68A87924EC\Shakopee.15505.1. Engi neering_M emo_Vacation_of_Easements_12_19_23.docx Page 39 of 213 *4.C.2. Shakopee City Council January 2, 2024 FROM: Mark Noble, Senior Planner TO: Mayor and Council Members Subject: * Set Public Hearing Date for Proposed Vacation of a Segment of Sommerville Street Right - of -Way Policy/Action Requested: Adopt Resolution R2024-004, setting the public hearing date for vacation of a segment of Sommerville Street Public Right -of -Way. Recommendation: Approve the action requested. Discussion: The City of Shakopee has requested vacation of a segment of Sommerville Street Public Right -of -Way which would allow for the city to consolidate property associated with the River City Center (RCC). Presently, there is a segment of Sommerville, located north of 1st Avenue and south of County Road 101 that is still dedicated public right-of-way but is actually used as a driveway for the RCC (see attached site aerial). The EDA and the city, as owners of the RCC and the land around the building, would like to clean up some of the outstanding properties and once completed, replat the property into a single legal parcel as part of the creation of the condominiums for the building. The attached Resolution R2024-004 sets a public hearing date of Tuesday, January 16, 2024, to consider the vacation of this public right-of-way. On that date, comments from staff members and utilities, as well as a recommendation from the Planning Commission, will be presented to the City Council for consideration. The Planning Commission will consider this request at their January 4, 2024 meeting. Budget Impact: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Page 40 of 213 a Resolution R2024-004 o Site Aerial Page 41 of 213 RESOLUTION R2024-004 A RESOLUTION SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF A SEGMENT OF SOMMERVILLE STREET PUBLIC RIGHT- OF-WAY WHEREAS, it has been presented to the Shakopee City Council that a segment of Sommerville Street public right-of-way is no longer of public use or interest; and WHEREAS, a public hearing must be held before an action to vacate can be taken and two weeks published and posted notice thereof must be given; and WHEREAS, the proposed vacation is described as: Sommerville Street Public Right -of -Way located north of 1st Avenue East and south of State Highway 101 bypass, as shown on the attached site aerial; and WHEREAS, two weeks published notice will be given in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS and posted notice will be given by posting such notice on the bulletin board in the Shakopee City Hall. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that a hearing be held in the Council Chambers on the 16th day of January, 2024, at 7:00 P.M. or thereafter, on the matter of the vacation of a segment of Sommerville Street Public Right -of -Way. Adopted in Regular Session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the 2" a day of January, 2024. ATTEST: Lori Hensen, City Clerk Mayor of the City of Shakopee Page 42 of 213 111,,u1 0i(1 /01 +11f1 01,1; eiter r ,,, 0000000000000010000000001100 0000 00000 1000000000000000000000000000;001 0000 000000. 009 0 00 11 11 011110011111,111 11 1111111111111111111111111111110000000000000000000000000000001,0001000000010111 Hos 000000110000010 000000000000000110111111111111111111 tri!Ft 110111111111111111111111111 1000000000000000000000000000000011.......1 001100000000111141111111111110101000000000000000 000000000000000001000,1 ill111111000001111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111/111/111/1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111? ;100,00000,0400 00110,101 000001 000 000000011001 ,1101110,00000000p0000011 001100 ,,, „ 11„,1010000,,,,,„„t, (rifte(el,,,h,,fit„,( iiih(1010100 h „,10 oomm0000h 01111111111° 000mo00(10000,101,0,000000111,,,, 100(00,0 u„,„,000000000 o010111,, 11 111111111 h00,,,,,,11 11111(1(1 01100101000100..„, polooloolool000,00000000iilth(((pf,„„0,„,,,,,,, 70„0„fiIIII 010000000000,00010h0100, 0000001000000IIIII01000000000000000100:10I71 .111111111111111 h 11111111111111111111111111 00000000 0110100000000000000000000000000010000000000000000000000000100000000000010,10010000000000000000000000m000i 1101000000010000000000000000000000 0,10000- tr,Ilms111111111111111111111111111111111111 10000000000.00000011111111111100 11 °V°°°V1U"""°11111' 000 700 10000000,0,000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000111100000000000looi000000 0000000001„„„„„„„00.00001,0„0„ 101000000 00011 nu' 111,0111'111,111,1111 111111111,1111111111111111 1100 0011,1if 010000000000000000000000000000011,11111111111111111111111111111111111111 10111 01111 00010 111001 100rI 00011 00°1 10006 0000011 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111III 0000000000000000000000001111111111111111111110000000000101: ..00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000001010101010101 1,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00 0000000000000000000101 00000000000000000000 0000000000010 100000001 00000000000011101000000000000000000000000000000 111111111111 000 '11!uuluuuluu0. ououoluuuuhuuuuuuuuuuuluuuuuuu 010100000000000000000000111111,11 100 010000000000000000000000 0000000011.11 u000011 U11111111101000uuu 111000100,1 t,rouu yuuuuuu 10000000000000000000010 0101 Iluouluououuuuul 1001 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111i10 II 4 II 00000000, 10000 111,11,00 100000000000,000000000000000000,0000 00,000000000000000polool0000000ool 1„„„„„„„„„„1000000000000000000 1,0 „„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„,0000000000000000,0000,00,0,000,0,0000,1 """""""""""""""""""""""00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,"0",000, ,00,00 010000 00000001 0,0000,0,00,0000, 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111 00olooloolooloolloolommookolo ool0000000000 m0000000000000000 i000 111111111111111111111111110:00.111 „, „„ A1000010 111 11100:0 141 01 0000- 11'1011111110111000010110000000111111 000000011 iiiiiiii000000000000 00000001 000000; 1011101001111 1111010011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111100 00000000000000000 0000001111000 ' 010001 11 101,1me "11111"1°1111141111101°: i0000001000101001100100000 100000101011,1011 00000[111111\11'1'111'1:1!111111111 00000000000 000000,00000000000111111111111111111111111111011111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111 11 11 1111111 111111111111111 01011 II 10 110 11(1 (1 (1 (1 (1 (1 (1 1000101 4).;;,1.,,I ;0,0 ;100;000000000 11 011 11 11 11 000' 111111111111111111111111111111 1 111110001111111111111111111111 100000000000000000111111110001000000001111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111111111111110000000000 00000000000 01111111111111111111111111111111111 1 u1000000000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000 111 11111111 III "III, 1000000 0,00,10,111111h10000000000 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110000000 11'1111111111!111111111 :0100001o, 11111 1011111001111111111 1 101111111 ,Juu 11 111 II 1 100 00000000000 000001 1gf00 fIr°1 frruu c 1111111111111111111110101111111111111111111111111110010111110,h0iffilhhillIc;11„,„,,, „ , 0 100000001("1 W1 °III °I111/1 ?1,0„0"10°1010„ 111111111111111111111111111 1 1 0,0000000IIIIIIIII 1000000000000000000000000000 //o Shakopee Municipal Boundary 1111111111 1 uppoppoppoppouppouppou ou01000111,101011111°,1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111000000000000000100111°1 °°Ill1;lul11111i1111111111„ Ihooholihoi II0000000011 111,10.1pulpuppppipupppop 11000110000000000001000000011111111111 0'10'01'1 111111 000000000001111111000001 000000000000 111111,1101 1010000000000000000000000111000010000000000000000000000000 1111111111111111111111111111110 uutru0011. up,pupupupupupupupuppuppp c' UP100000000000 000 10000001000000000000000000000000 111000011111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111100000 0100001,0010000000 1 0000 0000000001111111111111111111111 11101000000000000000000000000111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1001000000P0p 0111,00111111111111111111101111111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111111 0,11,111PuppIuulu III 1 111 00111111 00 ,t,,,,u1110100 01111111111111001.0100000up 1,100000100000000000000,00001111111111111111111111111111111111,111111111111111 011111100000111111000000000111111111111110 00000000000011111101111111111111111111000 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111 Olio 11111111 000000000000001100000010000,1 ihi000,10,000000,0000000000011 111111110 01111 '11111111111111111 ;11111111111111111111111111011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110110010001 g go 00 10,0 0000001010010000000111111,V, II 0 111111111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1" 011111111111111111111111110101100,„0„„„0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000100 " 0000000000000000010000011 ,,, 111111111111111111111111111 171111111111111111111110 1111 01111011110100111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111000000000000 00000000000000000000001'1'1'00 1,01111010010:00000000111111111111111111111111111111111111111PPIP0111111111111,111111110010 1i1111 0 VI 1111100 o0Iho0hhh,00,00,00,0„10,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,0000hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh0h'hh((1(hhhh((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((000000 H1101:111:1111 Ililii111111111111111111111 H(0001000,00000000IIIII1101 111110111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111000 „ 1111111111,1111111111,1111111111111111 0111 0001111111111110011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110010000 111119,kky1111111111111.111111111111111111111111111111111111”... 1111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111J11111 1111111110111111"011101111111 00000 1111111111101011111010101010101010101'01010111010101010111 , III 11111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111,11,11,11,1101'11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111 1111 1111 0000111000i° I „„,„„ 11111111111111 0111P10110000000001110001111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111 0001111111111111111111111111111111111111111111uu 11 1 1111111111111111 1110 """"11 1111 11111111111 11111111111111,111111111111 001000111111111111111111111111100000; 1010 00000 0 00„„.. 111111111111111111101 1 111111111111111111111111100 1111111111 0000000 11"1,00000000000h00000001111""""""""""""""'""'"'"" 01100000000.0000000000000„„„„„„4„„00e c Ell 111111000100111 11 111111111111111111111111111111111111 °I„.....!.1110111111111111111111111111111 1 PP rroo100000pop11111111111111111111PP111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110111111111111l11P00011111111111111111p11P11!1111111111 11111 000000000000 0 11111100 1111111111111111111111111111 111111110 „ 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111 1111111111111111111111111111 ppipppipppipppppkippillip1101111UIPUPPIII I II 1 111111111111111111111111111111111,1'1111111'111111'111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,0111111 .0.0 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 1100100010001111 0001010101011110001,00trilIIIIIIII 1111010 I 11111111111110 1 101100 000000000000000im $1. u011111111111111111111111111111111P1P11,1110uppoppoppos000000000 ‘'u" 11111111111111111110110 I111"""""""""""""000 00 1111111111111111111 000 popopoPpupp,„10,1111111 01111111111pupp 0000k uppuk „ 0011,0001, uuuuu,,11,0110000000100000000000000 1111111111111 ,,,,,..„01.o„,_..,„.„,„70,oro 110P1f0'14110910e,v101,101110r0°/1* 001 00 0, 000101010 00000001 0000000000000000000"111 uumilINEU 110111,11011 001 000000000000111111111111110111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111101111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1110111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110 11000 1111110,0000000111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11 11 1 111111111 01101100 0, 00000 00 0 01 II 111111 10000110i 1101 11111111U000011111101UpP0 011111111111111111111100000pop 0 00 001,101111111111Hu 111111111111111111 111111111111 'I 11111111111 110111111 0110h)1,1, op•pirup pipppipppip0 ppipppppp0000000100 1 111111111111111111110010.0000000i10110'0111100000000 111 1000,00 0000,, 000 00 ,00,,0,„„„„ ovoyolill11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110111111111111 u I 1 110001011000000000000000 1111111111111111111111111111 0000000100000000000000010 11 100100111111 11, 11111111111111111111'1111111111111170 11111'1111'111111tt 11111111110111,1 uuu000111' 111111111111111111111111 11001111111111111111111% 111 1 111°101 ruP111111P1 11 1110'1 11000;1101 100 1 ' i 00 )241 o r ;111 I Jon 1, ,Iv 11 1 1 „III, 01101 0 0/ , 0 ,/u , 1; ' ' ,,, '7'u '1 01111111111111111110100010001101111111 ) ' ' 'V./J 1111111111 )1/10)ii/OliUUI'l 1 111,1 fY.J 111111111 11111111, III 111111111111111111111111111 0111100010,011101110 ,0 100 1111111111111111111111111 1111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111'IIIII ,00000011111 1 E 0111.11111010111111111$111111100000 111 00o001011110 11 11 111111111'1'1111 0;;11.1-11111-1001n1 010000000000000000111111 11,10000000000000000000100 101111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110! op 11 „ 0c„ I 11° 000000001011101111111111111111111111111111,11,111111111111 111111111111111 AA' Si IAKOPE E December 27, 2023 001111111111111111111111111100000 111111111Eiti1p 111 ER ER, IETU kluk 100000000000011IIIIIIWik001),, 10111[111 11111111 „k1 000100001111IN 11111U 1 14.011r:11:0000001010000tfiroq 1.11.0001p y 00000 """""' Inuu 00000110010011111111111011010100 1111p1p11111111111111 upp011 111111111111111111111111111111111 PIE UPUUUUu,, ,Upplp11100,1111111111111110000000p "1,011111111101111111100000000 1, 01011pp1111111ppluul,uppuuk, 111111111111111'1, 111111111 111::011h1111..,,,111 '10011111111111111111111111,100 111,11 1111 1111111111110100000000 1111111111111,1A1A111111111 u1uuuu1' 01Hu00000000000000000' 0000000000000000000000000 011111101c 01 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1000000ooloolool0000ll000000000lo00 00111111100000 ""Iyitp01111,111101101000""""" 1600 1111 1111111111111111111111 1'1'1000111110 111111111111111 '''1,1),1!Illif11,c / ru ,0A,„0;",,,',j1i0I000,,i00 •‘0 1 i oO1111.12.1-NU100 yqui0p,po i pupPI10„0, ur i / '111111111111111111 0 0001111Ipppp pu101111111111111'111111111111111 11 0100 111,1„111111110111001111110111111°1111110110110011 1111111111111 0 0 0 01,01101'1P: ip 1101011101111111°01111111111111°1 Iii IIIII11111111111111 , 1 u ol111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111 111111111 0 00111 10110111111111111111111upppp , 1 siu 0,00000,;000011111111111101111111 2 III / I 1111111111101111111,o,1,11 11 101110100000111 11111111 11110 il 4 110Uk„ u,,,,,110uppipluiltpuiplptilpplipp 011111111111111111111111110000000001001, 0 111111 up \11111111111111111111 11111111111111 01111 )11'1IIIIII,111000,0,11111 11111111111' 1111111111111111111111111111111, 1111 11111111111111111111111 ) uu 00000 000 0000011100000111100, \\Iuuu.111111101111111111, 001100u uuluu11,11,01,11,011110111111111110111R00 ‘Fu 00111111111 1100000000 1011111111110111111 111111111 1111111111111111 11111111111 1111111111111111111111 400 00011111111:r„0/011100 , /0(ia 11111111 / 1111111011 0,10 110 01017/ I 11 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 (ii(u(e 1 P1)1\1 t P111111 0000000001000000000000000001101 111)t), )1011 111000000000000000000000000000000 III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1000 11p Ip0 1000000000000000000000000000000 A 11110000 jtY7 471/(i ffi 111111*°1100 11111111111110001111111 01 111101100110\ I 1111111111111111 t 0111000000000011goo pFrCE 0000000011111111111111111111111110 101) )111111111111111111 1110 II II 1 „ 1$°P0 10 000\1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111110 111111111111111111 011111111111111111111111111 1111111,1111111 11111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIh 11111111111111 Sommerville Right -of -Way Vacation Page 43 of 213 000111,1,1111111111111111111111111„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„,„„„„ 11111111111111111111111111111 11111111 1111 1,011111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111 e ,t11,i1111111:illoiki1;111, u„00101111111,111111101h1‘11,11.1,1.,00, 11111111111111111111111111 '11111111111111111111 1p11111„111111111pppp111111111II1PP II1111111 111111111111111111111 000000 01011010I1110000 00010 000000 oiollooloio011 11111111111111111111111,1i 1„ 1111 1 1:111111111111111111111111111111111:11111111 111111111111111111"11 11111111 ',111,1, ;111111111111111111111111‘11111i110111111111111111111111111'1,,,, 1°1111111111111111111' 11111,00 0 111111111'1'111111 uu, 0c11111111100,,uu „00toitii111#40001111111011101 fuldfoheo 111/V u1,1 )H111111111111111111111111111 111111111111 uu 111111111001 110'011111101110 111111111111111111111111111111 1 "'I 1111AI 1111 111111111 In11,,,111,1,11111,11 iktf/4.41.4,1111114,11111 11 1 111111111 '411111111111111 011.1 1111 „„1111111111111111101111140 '11111 111011110,11011111,11111;1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 0„„„00,0,01,00,00,00,00,00,00u 0011111111111111100111111111000110. 1,111 1101111110111 !lk$101011 10° ,(110 °11I, 0Uo 1,111i,010,,!11,I1 0 0.0075 0.015 *4.C.3. Shakopee City Council January 2, 2024 FROM: Michael Kerski, Planning/Development Director TO: Mayor and Council Members Subject: Approval of Contract with 106 Group for preparation of the Shakopee Riverfront Cultural Area Multiple Property Documentation Forms (MPDF). Policy/Action Requested: Approve execution of a contract with the 106 Group for $143,381 plus a contingency of $10,000 for preparation of MPDF for the Shakopee Riverfront Cultural Area Multiple Property Forms to create a National Register District. Recommendation: Approve contract with 106 Group. Discussion: The city received a grant of $77,500.00 from the Minnesota Historical Society towards completion of a Multiple Property Documentation Form and ultimately, creation of the Shakopee Riverfront Cultural Area National Register Nomination. The city advertised a RFQ/RFP for qualified firms to prepare the forms and nomination and solicited directly ten firms for proposals. The only firm that responded was the 106 Group. They are an award -winning firm with a passion for history and culture. For over 30 years, they have developed innovative solutions to protect resources and uncover powerful stories. Among the many awards they have received includes the 2023 American Institute of Architects Preservation Award for the adaptive reuse of structures at Fort Snelling; 2022 American Association for State and Local History Award for Excellence for Leadership in History; 2020 National Association of Environmental Professionals Environmental Excellence Award for the NEPA for Flying Cloud (CDAH 61) reconstruction. 106 Group will complete its work using Guidelines for Local Surveys: A Basis for Preservation Planning, National Register Bulletin 24; The Secretary of the Interior's Page 44 of 213 Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation as Amended and Annotated; and the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) Historic and Architectural Survey Manual by experienced architectural historians, historians, and archaeologists who meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards. The MPDF will be prepared according to the National Register Bulletin How to Complete the National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form. Once complete, 106 Group will work with you as the MPDF is shepherded through the various stages of formal review (ex., SHPO review, MN State Review Board, National Park Service review, etc.). The 106 Group is also currently working on completing the fmal plans for the Cultural Corridor in cooperation with Scott County Historical Society, Scott County, City of Shakopee, Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community, MNDNR and the Shakopee Heritage Society. The Multiple Property nomination will start at the Lewis Street Bridge and end at and include the The Landing operated by Three Rivers Park District. There are a number of properties and structures, including the bridge and the Schroeder House and Livery that are already listed on the National Register of Historic Places. This larger nomination will include those properties currently listed and will examine other potential properties and archeological sites that could also be included. As part of this project, they may also identify additional sites that may require archeological work, which is not covered under this contract. Should these be found, staff will bring back a cost estimate for approval. While National Register listing does not prohibit a property from being demolished, projects undertaken, funded, licensed, or permitted by Federal agencies are reviewed by the Preservation Office to determine if they will affect properties which are listed in the National Register or eligible for listing in the National Register. The Preservation Office also reviews projects undertaken, funded or licensed by State departments and agencies which may affect a property which is listed in the National Register. It is the responsibility of the Federal or State agencies to notify the Preservation Office of proposed projects. Ways are then discussed to protect the property or mitigate the effects of the project on it. Budget Impact: Funding for the city's portion will be out of funds budgeted for professional services. ATTACHMENTS: Page 45 of 213 a 106 Proposal Page 46 of 213 hwaliiuruo oelo t' ce 1;'95 II croon uirnzn II el11v(.1 111"4 ME311113wmbu II u1u,u 55 a:P:r December 18, 2023 Michael Kerski, Director of Planning & Development City of Shakopee 485 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Shakopee Riverfront Cultural Area MPDF Proposal Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota Dear Michael: 106 Group is pleased to present our proposal for preparing a Multiple Property Documentation Form (MPDF) for the Shakopee Riverfront Cultural Area, which spans the south bank of the Minnesota River from the Holmes Street Bridge through The Landing — a unit of Three River Park District. We appreciate this opportunity to build upon the many cultural resource surveys we've completed with you and your partners throughout this corridor, as well as our current interpretive planning and design work to develop robust visitor experiences for the Shakopee Riverfront Cultural Trail (SRCT) corridor. As you know, a MPDF serves as the basis for evaluating the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligibility of related properties and is not a nomination in its own right. For this project, the MPDF will be used to identify relevant existing historic contexts and develop up to four custom historic contexts related to properties within the corridor. It will identify properties that are representative of the themes outlined in the contexts and provide criteria for the evaluation and future nomination of thematically related properties. The preparation of this MPDF will serve as an important foundational tool for identifying, evaluating, and nominating significant historic and cultural resources on the Shakopee riverfront to the NRHP. Beyond identifying and providing the basis for evaluating resources, the MPDF and its associated contexts will provide a critical framework that may further assist with the development of interpretive storylines, and will provide guidance and recommendations for agencies, groups, and landowners to make informed planning decisions. The MPDF will aid in describing and evaluating heritage resources along the Minnesota River in Shakopee that are worthy of protection and preservation. Page 47 of 213 Background research, context development, architectural history survey, and reporting will be conducted in accordance with the Guidelines for Local Surveys: A Basis for Preservation Planning, National Register Bulletin 24; The Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. for Archeology and Historic Preservation as Amended and Annotated; and the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) Historic and Architectural Survey Manual by experienced architectural historians, historians, and archaeologists who meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards. The MPDF will be prepared according to the National Register Bulletin How to Complete the National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form. Once complete, 106 Group will work with you as the MPDF is shepherded through the various stages of formal review (ex., SHPO review, MN State Review Board, National Park Service review, etc.). Scope of Work: The MPDF Scope of Work will include the following tasks: M ) q::::::,,,eS Kick -Off CaII l We'll begin with a kick-off call with you, our project manager, and our principal investigators for archaeology and architectural history to discuss the MPDF, sites of interest, geographic scope, and potential context studies. Following the call, we will prepare an informal research design document that outlines key research questions, areas of study for the MPDF, research materials to obtain, and repositories to visit. We will submit it to you for your review before commencing the study. Research Our research will build upon previously conducted architectural history and archaeological surveys, previously established NRHP contexts, and existing NRHP nominations and listings. We will complete a comprehensive literature review and synthesis of available cultural resource studies previously conducted in the area; identify the key themes to be presented in the MPDF and properties that should be included; and recommend a physical boundary for the properties included in the MPDF. Page 48 of 213 Supplemental research for this MPDF will be conducted at several repositories, including: • The Minnesota Historical Society and University of Minnesota to locate historical maps, aerial photographs, and local histories in order to further aid in the development of the historic contexts. • Local libraries, government offices, Tribal cultural centers, and historical societies, including the Scott County Historical Society, Scott County Library, and Scott County Government Center, to gather additional information related to the sites of interest and surrounding area. • Other repositories as needed. Given the large number of architectural history properties and archaeological sites present within the project area, this scope of work assumes a maximum of 178 total person -hours of dedicated research time for MPDF preparation. St k `ey After completion of research tasks, and concurrent with our initial drafting of the context narratives, an architectural history survey will be conducted of buildings/structures and landscape features located within the Shakopee Riverfront Cultural Area. Resources will be documented with detailed notes and digital photographs. The survey will provide current photographic evidence of historic and cultural sites and provide the foundation for the MPDF property type descriptions. Physical conditions will also inform the appropriateness of the recommended MPDF boundary. Survey will be conducted in all areas that we are permitted to access. This may require some landowner coordination by the City. Depending upon their interest in participation, up to two ten-hour days will be spent visiting sites of importance identified by representatives from the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community (SMSC). Documentation of these sites will be at the discretion of Tribal representatives, but may include general geographic boundaries, digital photographs of current conditions, and digital notes capturing observations of current and past characteristics. Archaeological field survey is not included at this stage of the project. Should the MPDF research task described above identify specific areas where the execution of archaeological survey methods will substantially contribute to the robusticity Page 49 of 213 or utility of the final MPDF document, then those efforts will be recommended, and a scope of work amendment can be prepared. M Preparation We will draft the MPDF according to the National Park Service's template. Our in-house GIS analyst will create maps depicting all properties that were surveyed as part of the MPDF; depict geographical boundaries for the context narratives; and prepare other figures and graphics, if applicable. Up to six (6) individual National Register nomination forms will be prepared for properties meeting the criteria outlined in the MPDF. Additionally, we will provide the GIS shapefiles to SHPO of all maps created for this project. Once the draft MPDF is prepared, an electronic copy will be submitted to you for review and comment. We will address your comments and prepare a revised draft for submittal to SHPO for review and comment. It is assumed that two rounds of review will be necessary in order to prepare a final MPDF for the State Review Board. We will prepare a final hard copy archival submission and an electronic MPDF and all required supporting documentation for your records and for submission to the Keeper of the National Register. Meetings & Coordir- Lien Public Meetings We recommend that the City, with our guidance and support, organizes and facilitates one public meeting near the start of the project to introduce the project to residents and stakeholders, introduce the consultant team, solicit input on relevant research materials and properties to be studied, and answer questions. To reach the widest audience, we recommend that this meeting be held virtually, if that has been an effective method of engagement for the City in the past. We recommend that the City holds a second virtual public meeting in the early stages of drafting the MPDF to provide an update, share new information, and keep the public informed about the effort. The City will lead the meeting and we will prepare presentation materials to summarize what has been done to date and what is still to come. Finally, we recommend that the City holds a third virtual public meeting near the end of the project to report results and share next steps. The City will lead the Page 50 of 213 meeting and we will prepare presentation materials to summarize the results of the project. If you would like our participation in additional public meetings beyond those outlined above (ex., additional community outreach sessions, City council presentations, etc.), we can bill additional hours on a time -and -materials basis, or revise this scope of work to include greater public engagement, as desired. Upon completion of the MPDF, 106 Group will work with you to shepherd the MPDF through the various stages of formal review, including: • SHPO Review & approval • State Review Board • National Park Service/NRHP Keeper Review Cost & Schedule The 106 Group can complete this MPDF in the manner outlined above for an amount not to exceed $143,3811. Typically, an MPDF is developed over the course of a year, from onset to approval at a State Review Board meeting, which occurs quarterly. However, we understand that this project is funded in part with grant dollars, which may impact the timeline of certain deliverables. As outlined in the RFP, 106 Group can complete all research, public meetings, preparation of inventory forms and draft submission of the MPDF packet to the City and SHPO by June 1, 2024. If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me at Bill Wallker0 Il06 rrwow r°mnl„ or 651-403-8711. Sincerely, Bill Walker Proposal Manager & Cultural Resources Planner 106 GROUP 1 The price quoted in this proposal is guaranteed for six (6) months from the date of submission. If more than six months elapse between submission and acceptance of this proposal, 106 Group reserves the right to make appropriate adjustments to the price. Page 51 of 213 Additional Submission Requirements: The team we've assembled for this project is comprised of the following individuals who exceed the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for History, Architectural History, and Archaeology. Resume's for the following team members are attached: • Adam Kaeding, Archaeology Manager • Madeline Bray, Senior Archaeologist • Lindsey Wallace, Senior Architectural Historian • Steve Gallo, Senior Historian Examples of previous National Register nominations, with an emphasis on Multiple Property Nominations, if available. Our team has extensive experience surveying and evaluating a wide variety of cultural resources — from buildings and landscapes to archaeological sites and traditional cultural properties - for NRHP eligibility. This includes a thorough understanding of Multiple Property Documentation Form (MPDF) guidelines, completing NRHP nominations (example: Herman Schroeder House and Livery), nomination amendments, and National Historic Landmark nominations (example: Fort Snelling National Historic Landmark) throughout the U.S. Complete copies of the items listed above are available upon request. Examples of previous archaeological studies. We have successfully completed thousands of archaeological projects for federal, state, local, and tribal governments as well as private developers and individuals. Whether complying with regulatory obligations, pursuing research interests, or conducting small- or large-scale surveys and excavations, we ensure fast and accurate data management with the highest level of accuracy, efficiency, and technical standards. The team we have assembled for this project has explicit experience conducting archaeological field work and preparing archaeological studies within the Shakopee Riverfront Cultural Area (Memorial Park, The Landing: Minnesota River Heritage Park, etc.). Previous work if applicable with Minnesota Indigenous people and Tribal Nations. Over the past three decades, 106 Group has specialized in working with and for Tribes and other Native communities, both in Minnesota and nationally. Our projects include collaboration with Dakota people and other Native partners around cultural resource preservation, heritage interpretation, and public education. Whether working with tribal leaders, tribal historic preservation officers, artists, Elders, or other knowledge keepers, we have developed lasting relationships built on trust and respect. We know that it is essential for non -Native people to better understand Indigenous peoples' past, while also recognizing their ongoing presence. Page 52 of 213 III Connecting People * Place # Time A .A ADAM KAEDING m ' " MIA" i,. rI Summary of + ualifications Adam's experience in archaeology spans North America, Central America, and Asia. For over a decade, he has been supervising teams comprised of up to 20 archaeologists, students, and seasonal workers in nearly all aspects of archaeology. He is experienced in conducting reconnaissance surveys, evaluations, and mitigation/data recovery in the United States, including excavation work across seven states. Adam has presented his work at professional conferences; has worked closely with Dakota, Ojibwe, and Cherokee Tribal Historic Preservation Officers, monitors, elders, and community members; and led public outreach and education efforts among rural Maya descendant communities as well as in elementary, middle, and high school classrooms. elevant Experience Project Manager I Twin Ports Interchange, Duluth, MN (2023-present) Oversaw and provided osteological and artifact identifications to Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa during a MnDOT highway reconstruction project. Provided guidance in the development of a repository on the Fond du Lac reservation, managed by tribal members and staff. Project Manager I Thumper Burial Assessment, MN (2022) Oversaw the execution of and associated agency coordination for a burial site and human remains assessment of a private property abutting known sites. Project Manager I Fish Hatchery Trail, MN (2022-2023) Oversaw the research and drafting of an archaeological literature review, assessment, burials/human remains assessment, and Phase I investigation for a 1.4-mile proposed trail reconstruction. Senior Archaeologist I Fond du Lac Archaeological Investigation Training, MN (2022) Oversaw the development and implementation of a four -day archaeological investigation training program designed for tribal cultural and natural resource management staff members. Modules included: CRM standards and guidelines; regulatory information and processes; fundamental concepts in archaeology; archaeological methods and investigation types; archaeological data documentation and collection; human and nonhuman bone identification and protocols; GIS overview; conducting archaeological literature reviews and assessments of archaeological potential; and writing archaeological reports. Principal Investigator I Spring Lake Park Reserve, Ravine Stabilization, Cultural Resources Literature Review and Archaeological Assessment & Phase I Survey, MN (2021) Oversaw completion of a cultural resources literature review and archaeological assessment and Phase I Survey in anticipation of ravine stabilization and erosion control. The study and survey assisted Dakota County with applicable state cultural resources laws compliance, and included coordination with the Upper Sioux Indian Community. Page 53 of 213 C:onrr sting People * Place #Time A .A ADAM KAEDING m ' " MA "° G Principal Investigator & Project Manager Hentges Industrial Park, MN (2021) Supervised archaeological literature review and assessment, monitoring plan development, and coordination with OSA/MIAC prior to and during monitoring for a development project. The City of Shakopee (RGU) determined that development must comply with the Minnesota Private Cemeteries Act. Principal Investigator I Cherokee Heritage Center, MN (2020-2023) Worked with the Cherokee Nation to ensure appropriate archaeological and historical documentation and mitigation to cultural resources surrounding the demolition and new construction of the Cherokee Heritage Center. Part of the original building rests on the site of the 1851 First Female Cherokee Seminary. Completed a range of services including mitigation documentation and photography (to HABS standards), and prepared an organizational and site history for the original visitor center. Prepared an Archaeological Management Plan and Materials Salvage Plan in preparation for demolition to guide demolition specifications, and performed archaeological investigations. All work informed the Master Plan and future planning and site development. Project Manager I Historic Fort Snelling Revitalization, MN (2020-2021) Supervised the archaeological monitoring of construction associated with the Minnesota Historical Society's Historic Fort Snelling Revitalization Project, in order to comply with the Programmatic Agreement that was executed as part of Section 106 compliance. Senior Archaeologist & Principal Investigator I Sweeney Property & & Brick House Cultural Resources, MN (2020) Supervised a Phase I survey and Phase II archaeological evaluation survey of the Sweeney Property and Schroeder Brick House, to help inform the City of Shakopee's development of a cultural corridor along the Minnesota River. Senior Archaeologist & Project Manager I Flying Cloud Drive (CSAH 61) Reconstruction, MN (201 3present) Supervised and conducted extensive Phase I survey and geomorphological testing for a proposed road reconstruction project adjacent to the MN River Valley and associated wetlands in Hennepin County. Planned, supervised, and performed intensive Phase II evaluation for nine sites and six NRHP eligible sites. Analyzed and interpreted data, performed literature review and background research, and authored reports. Education • Ph.D. Archaeology Boston University • B.A. Anthropology with Archaeology Emphasis University of West Florida • NEPA Compliance & Cultural Resources National Preservation Institute Certifications & '"registrations • Registered Professional Archaeologist • Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for Archaeology (prehistoric and historical) • OSHA HAZWOPER Certified • Red Cross Adult First Aid, CPR, and AED Certified Page 54 of 213 III Connecting People * Place # Time MADELEINE BRAY 0 Summary of o ualifications Madeleine is a cultural resources specialist and Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) with 16 years in cultural resources management and 23 years of survey, excavation, and project management experience in the United States, Greece, and Israel. She is experienced in conducting Phase I surveys, Phase IT evaluations, prehistoric and historic archaeological site documentation, historical research, mitigation recommendations, Native American outreach, and construction monitoring. A skilled writer, Madeleine authors and provides senior -level review of documents in support of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). elevant Experience Principal Investigator 1 Historic Fort Snelling Revitalization, MN (2019-Present) Prepared a monitoring plan and oversaw construction monitoring, in order to comply with the Programmatic Agreement that was executed as part of Section 106 compliance. Managed documentation of hundreds of significant archaeological features during construction in consultation with MNHS, NPS, contractors, and agencies. Currently overseeing artifact inventory and final reporting. Principal Investigator State Capitol Cultural Resources Assessment and Historic Context, MN (2020- 2022) Prepared a literature review and archaeological assessment, historic context, and research design for the Minnesota State Capitol Area to inform future planning and development within this significant historic area. Co -Principal Investigator & Project Manager Water Works Park, MN (2016-2021) Prepared an archaeological assessment and research design for four historical mill and railroad sites within in the NRHP-listed St. Anthony Falls Historic District, supervised Phase II and Phase III archaeological investigation and construction monitoring, and provided regulatory process support. Senior Archaeologist 1 Point State Park, PA (2018-2022) Co-author of the Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) for this large urban park. The CRMP provides an overview of the park's significant cultural resources and lays out an organizational and regulatory framework for addressing protection and regulatory needs of those resources to inform park planning and management. Senior Archaeologist Flying Cloud Drive (CSAH 61) Reconstruction, MN (2016-2019) Conducted Phase TTT data recovery and laboratory analysis at six NRHP-eligible sites for a proposed road reconstruction project adjacent to the Minnesota River Valley. Planned and supervised ceramic analysis and co- authored chapters of the final report. Principal Investigator 1 Northern Natural Gas Improvement, Multiple States (2017-2019) Oversaw literature searches and assessments of archaeological potential, as well as Phase 1 surveys if necessary; prepared letters providing determination of project effects for use in Section 106 consultation. Sites located in Minnesota, Wisconsin, South Dakota, Iowa, and Nebraska. Page 55 of 213 III Connecting People # Place +Ti, y MADELEINE BRAY A Principal Investigator 1 I-90 Exit 406 Interchange, SD (2016-2017) Supervised an archaeological assessment and Phase I and II (Level III) surveys. Conducted background research and on -site assessment of archaeological sensitivity, authored a research design, supervised Phase I survey and Phase II evaluation of a precontact site, and authored the technical report. Archaeologist & Project Coordinator Highway 42 Improvements, SD (2016) Coordinated cultural resources literature review and assessment for a 15.1-mile segment of highway in South Dakota in compliance with Section 106. Cultural Resources Project Manager Santa Susana Field Laboratory, CA (2013-2016) Authored an Archaeological District Evaluation and oversaw a geoarchaeological study at a 2,850-acre former rocket engine testing and nuclear research facility. Coordinated with United States Department of Energy (DOE), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), state agencies, and tribes regarding impacts to archaeological sites, including significant rock art, and a Traditional Cultural Property. Senior Archaeologist and Field Director 1 Path 46 Clearance Surveys Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP), CA (2013-2016) Supervised and led pedestrian archaeological survey of 77 proposed grading areas, staging areas, and roads throughout the Mojave Desert. Prepared a work plan for submittal to the BLM. Authored a report documenting the results of the surveys and providing recommendations for the dozens of sites recorded. Senior Archaeologist & Field Director Cadiz Groundwater, CA (2009-2012) Supervised and led Phase 1 archaeological survey, including literature review, pedestrian surveys of the 2200- acre project area, and Native American outreach. Prepared a technical report that evaluated the NRHP and California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) eligibility of over 90 archaeological sites. Senior Archaeologist & Field Director Abandoned Mine Land Whitmore Archaeological Inventory, CA (2012) Supervised and led pedestrian archaeological survey and prepared an inventory of 184 historic abandoned mine features. Coordinated with two BLM offices, performed archival and historic research, led a team of surveyors in the documentation of the features, prepared site records, and authored a report providing significance recommendations, in compliance with Section 106. Field Director l East Branch Enlargement Project, CA (2009-2010) Supervised and led pedestrian archaeological survey of a 98-mile project area along the California Aqueduct. Drafted a survey strategy for agency approval, coordinated with California Department of Water Resources, prepared the survey report and completed site records for more than 100 archaeological sites identified during survey. Education Certifications ' egistrations • M.A. Archaeology University of California, Los Angeles • B.A. Classical Archaeology Macalester College • Registered Professional Archaeologist • Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for Archaeology • OSHA HAZWOPER Certified Page 56 of 213 III Connecting People * Place # Time LINDSEY WALLACE AG Summary of ualifications Lindsey is an architectural historian and planner with 15 years of professional experience working at the intersection of historic preservation, cultural resources, grant management, and community development. She is an expert in reviewing and evaluating compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and local processes for issuing certificates of appropriateness. She collaborates frequently with federal, state, and local preservation and community development officials and partners. Lindsey brings a keen attention to detail, complex problem -solving skills, conscientious management and organization of information, and excellent customer service to all her work. elevant Experience Principal Investigator, Architectural Historian, & Project Coordinator I Kalorama Cottage, MN (2023 present) Provided the private property owner expert architectural history analysis related to the current historical integrity of the locally landmarked Kalorama Cottage in Excelsior, Minnesota. Principal Investigator & Project Coordinator' Duluth International Airport, MN (2021-present) Led the development of an reconnaissance architectural history survey for portions of the hangar area at the Duluth International Airport to support a master plan, which will inform future planning and redevelopment of the hangar area. Future development at the airport will require approval from the Federal Aviation Administration and, therefore, would need to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, as well as applicable state mandates governing cultural resources. Project Manager I CR 44 Sherburne CR, MN (2023 present) Managed technical staff during the preparation of an Archaeology and Architectural History Literature Review and Archaeological Assessment of reconstruction of approximately 1.4 linear miles of CR 44 from Elk Lake Road to US Highway 10 in Elk River, Minnesota. Led communication and coordination with client. Oversaw budget and project schedule. Project Manager & Architectural Historian I Northfield Design Review, MN (2023) Led project and supported design review for the City of Northfield, Minnesota. on several historic preservation projects. Led communication and coordination with client. Oversaw budget and project schedule. Page 57 of 213 III Connecting People * Palace #Titre LINDSEY WALLACE Ills. 8 Project Manager 1 Blue Line Lake Street Station Section 106, MN (2023-present) Managed technical staff during the preparation of an architectural history survey and assessment of effects for a new light rail transit station. Led communication and coordination with client. Oversaw budget and project schedule. Architectural Historian & Project Coordinator 1 Schmid Ruins, MN (2023-present) Provided technical assistance for architectural history and supported team on the development of a monitoring plan to address State Historic Preservation Office concerns. The monitoring plan established protocols and provided guidance for archaeological monitoring during rubble removal and stabilization of NRHP-listed farmstead ruins. Architectural Historian & Project Coordinator 1 Mankato Airport, MN (2023-present) Supported the development of an Archaeological Literature Review and Assessment and an Architectural History Reconnaissance survey for the siting of a new air traffic control tower at the Mankato Airport. This project required compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as well as state laws governing cultural resources. Principal Investigator & Technical Lead 1 Blue Line LRT AH Survey, MN (2022-present) Leading research and development of architectural history reconnaissance and intensive architectural history survey, and assessment of effects analysis for an approximate 13-mile long Light Rail Transit (LRT) guideway corridor from downtown Minneapolis to Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. Work was completed on behalf of the project's lead agency, Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and the project proponent, Metropolitan Council. Principal Investigator & Technical Lead 13030 Nicollet Ave Historic Review, MN (2022-2023) Prepared an area of potential effect (APE) rationale, architectural history survey, and assessment of effects for a proposed housing development in Minneapolis. Director of Strategic Projects and Design Services 1 National Main Street Center (aka Main Street America), Chicago, IL (2014-2022) Led all preservation and design services and strategic projects. Evaluated the historic significance of historic properties and helped determine if properties met the criteria for the National Register of Historic Places and/or National Historic Landmark Designation. ducation • M.A. Historic Preservation Planning Cornell University • B.A. History, magna cum laude The Ohio State University (2005) Certifications & :''registrations • Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards in Architectural History Page 58 of 213 III Connecting I People # Place # Time STEVE GALLO Summary of o ualifications Steve is a published historian, with a PhD in American & Canadian Studies from the University of Nottingham, England, whose work focuses on built environments of the United States. He brings skills in researching neglected histories, such as the removal of a Freedpeople's settlement from what became Chimborazo Park in Richmond, VA, to his work in cultural resources. His doctoral thesis entitled "A Central Park of their Own: Urban Parks and the New South Movement, 1865-1920," was an extensive study of historic landscapes located in cities of the U.S. South that pays particular attention to their cultural and social significance. Steve is a skilled researcher and excellent communicator whether speaking at community events, teaching students in the classrooms, or writing for academic journals. elevant Experience Project Manager and Architectural Historian l Ely Municipal Airport Section 106, MN (2023 present) Oversaw preparation of an archaeological literature review and assessment and architectural history reconnaissance survey for the proposed acquisition of roughly 24.5 acres of land adjacent to the Ely Municipal Airport. Led communication and coordination with client and SHPO. Oversaw budget and project schedule. This project involved compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as well as compliance with state laws governing cultural resources. Architectural Historian Cargill East River Dredge Site Access Road and Culvert Improvement Project for the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District, MN (2023 present) Conducted reconnaissance and intensive survey, research, evaluation, and assessment of effects analysis for the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD) access road and culvert improvement project at the Cargill East River Dredge Site along the Lower Minnesota River. This project involved compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as well as compliance with state laws governing cultural resources. This project involved compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as well as compliance with state laws governing cultural resources. Historian 1 Fort Snelling NHL Nomination, MN (2022-Present) Supported the National Park Service in preparing an updated nomination for the Fort Snelling National Historic Landmark (NHL). The updated NHL nomination addresses all relevant historic contexts, areas of significance — beyond the current military significance, provided boundary justification, and clearly defined all contributing and noncontributing resources within the boundary. Architectural Historian Cargill East River Dredge Site Access Road and Culvert Improvement Project for the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District, MN (2023) Conducted research and development of an Architectural History Literature Review and Assessment for the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD) access road and culvert improvement project at the Cargill East River Dredge Site along the Lower Minnesota River. This project involved compliance with Page 59 of 213 III Connecting People * Palace #Titre STEVE GALLO Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as well as compliance with state laws governing cultural resources. Architectural Historian 1 Flying Cloud Airport, MN (2023) Completed architectural history reconnaissance survey related to the proposed demolition of five existing hangars at the Flying Cloud Airport, as part of the review process under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Historian Cherokee Heritage Center, OK (2022 present) Worked with the Cherokee Nation to ensure appropriate archaeological and historical documentation and mitigation to cultural resources surrounding the demolition and new construction of the Cherokee Heritage Center. Part of the original building rests on the site of the 1851 First Female Cherokee Seminary. Tasks included development of an organizational and site history for the Cherokee Heritage Center and preparation of mitigation documentation and photography (to HABS standards) for the original Cherokee National Museum building and Tsa-La-Gi Amphitheater. All work informed the Master Plan and future planning and site development. Architectural Historian 1 La Crosse Preservation Plan, WI (2022-present) Assisted in the development of a Heritage Preservation Plan that will be integrated into the City of La Crosse's Comprehensive Plan in order to ensure that future development is carried out with consideration for historic and cultural resources. Tasks included research, facilitating stakeholder interviews, drafting report, and review and report of project budget. Historian George Stoppel Farmstead, MN (2021-2022) Completed a historical research report on the European American settlement and development of the George Stoppel Farmstead in Rochester, Minnesota, and its relationship to Dakota presence to inform future site interpretation. Tasks included conducting historical research, drafting research report and annotated bibliography, and project coordination. Architectural Historian Cleary Lake Master Plan Support, MN (2021-2022) Conducted architectural history literature review and research and authored report in order to support master plan development for Cleary Lake Regional Park. Education Certifications & ,'registrations • PhD American & Canadian Studies • Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications University of Nottingham Standards for History • MRes American & Canadian Studies University of Nottingham • B.A. History • "Grant Park, Atlanta: An Old South Landscape for a Belmont University New South City." Southern Cultures. Publications • "Parks over Pasture: Enclosing the Commons in Postbellum New Orleans. " The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era. Page 60 of 213 *4.D.1. Shakopee City Council January 2, 2024 FROM: Josh Davis, Sergeant TO: Mayor and Council Members Subject: Declare Forfeited Firearms as Surplus Property Policy/Action Requested: Declare three firearms, ammunition and accessories as surplus property and authorize disposal. Recommendation: Approve policy/action as requested. Discussion: The three firearms with ammunition and accessories were obtained through forfeiture proceedings and are described as follows: 1. Nitro Hunter Shotgun 2. Walter PPQ45 Handgun and accessories 3. Glock 19 Handgun with magazines and ammunition Budget Impact: None. Page 61 of 213 *4.D.2. Shakopee City Council January 2, 2024 FROM: Jeff Tate, Chief of Police TO: Mayor and Council Members Subject: Appointment of Derek Nordtvedt to the rank of captain. Policy/Action Requested: Appoint Derek Nordtvedt to fill the vacant captain's position. Recommendation: Appoint Derek Nordtvedt to the rank of captain. Discussion: The police department has one vacant captain position due to the retirement of Captain Jason Arras. The Police Civil Service Commission has conducted the necessary testing and established the police captain eligible register. I recommend the appointment of Derek Nordtvedt to Police Captain at grade 210, Step 6 of the non -union pay plan. Budget Impact: Funds exist in the police budget for this position. Page 62 of 213 9.A.1. Shakopee City Council January 2, 2024 FROM: William H. Reynolds, City Administrator TO: Mayor and City Council Members Subject: Discuss Partnership with CDA on use of State -Supplied Affordable Housing Funds Policy/Action Requested: Provide feedback on CDA proposal. Recommendation: None. Discussion: The Scott County Community Development Agency would like to propose managing our future state -supplied affordable housing funds. They will make a presentation on one way this could work. The CDA has affordable housing as one of its core missions and has the manpower and expertise to assist managing these funds. The City of Shakopee does not have affordable housing as a core competency and does not employ those who have expertise in the effort. Budget Impact: None. ATTACHMENTS: o Presentation Page 63 of 213 OIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIId OP111111IIIIIII 111111111111111111 111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIII uu lllllllllllllllIII 1111111/ 111 dlllllllllllIII OP111111lllllllllllllllllll/ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111111111111111111 ORIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII L11111llllllllllll/ 01111111111111111111 INN 11 I•V INV irt INA ow. Page 64 of 213 Statewide Local Housing Aid (SAHA) • Minnesota Statutes Section 477A.36 • • State Appropriation M N O N i r1 N • c N O 4- J 4-1 N U 4-1 > O CO U • • Local Affordable Housing Aid (LAHA) • Minnesota Statues Section 477A.35 0.25% sales and use tax in metropolitan are Tax began collection October 1, 2023 Aid first paid in 2024, July and December ' < aU ca Q .> -2 c —1 ct o ' �r, (RS 0<0 � = Q •IIfiirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrIIIIII ,,,,, cu o E c a) O-2 ro U C0 _O a) c4-) a) L• L O L •� C " c O E 0- c cn O Q W c (i) 4' • cn c CIO . v / 0 CU CU E O uW1IIiiriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii111111"!��� in section 473.1: -0 o co o +. ro 0 a) o_ r1 co E - -0 CD '-I-+ CD CC C a) 'a -0 w o N c Page 67 of 213 1.1 • Based on available funds collected in June • Amounts distributed T O N E c cu o u CO O -a households in the community J- U -0 (1.) I - O Q cu = >-0 c 0 CO V • Page 68 of 213 0 O -co 0 O • Q c O " QO E • C c O> . (3) U O - • O & c E u O O o UO ' o . 0 • Permaneni . Refinancin . 0 U 3 N O N a) c O O O O D O O O v' X O S E O c o O U O 0 O E l00 lT U • LO O co vi U O ' O Q . � O �E O OU t O LL OE • Must be affordable to the local work • Emergency rental assistance • Support to nonprofit affordable housing ci ,,,,11•IIIIrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!,<-;; 0 0 Priority may be given to project Reduce disparities in home owners Improve the habitability of homE Create accessible housing Create more energy- or water -efficient Page 70 of 213 to 11' 1r1 %omiru1loom 1111111➢IIIII m/mttut Tut tool o 11)11111161, 3330 MOA444w Ilt ��g1am"tmol wMlllllllllll �c�11 mutll pr/rrr„»rm%" two a6411llU Nttt nn114M" .1411M1UUtiY 10Ittllluq 'll)rrrrlllll 01111111 31111116„11 ""omi�111U11g77 �;,Nm4ltllmi�� �oluirll tommtt40�� u UMIMIVV � amot tNn""o"t tlll mu I��I ""MIIM"Mltititi� ort tut mon 11�������111� Obt 1. rot f mllm,)1I f'61111?;\ %/J%lil i�dd 111111111 1J//ADI �llll mumuk � fl fl 10 7V e°rermmi 7''77778gIII11 �ll, rI1, m!l�UIUUM bIIIIell IIY N i ibn�llliiild41)111 l/%r LM, . 01uullI vol✓11 3�4 11 b1 3000 ),0033 NIIII�3 I LP 111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111 1,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11 111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 )1111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111) 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111 uuuullllllllllllllllo 10 6llllll 000iuuul IIIIIIII 0000000p0000000 r 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 pultnn MM I 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 ullllllllllllllll luuggq1..��. urns ) IVtuuuom11llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Pand 1111111111111 11111111�1���1'1111111 tool 11111111111111111111111111111 "lr ,,,: Preservation of existing units 2 Q 0 z I tio c E L O to 2 2 L _o c co 0 c O NJ Q a tlA _c c U _C 0 N ▪ j Q 7 L LE L z c co" N Q) Q L c a)" N 0 0_ C6 0 c, ▪ E c Q) N N to CT) a) 0 0 0 0 c- o c- o a- ) a, v oc oc cc Acquisition and rehab of existing rental units Land Acquisition Development, redevelopment (blighted areas) and construction of new affordable housing units Gap financing Homeownership Downpayment assistance • • Community Land Trust Page 72 of 213 I( 4:7; 11) 0 0 11111111111111111111 0 w CL ar) '11 I .1 cu a) a) E CI) 0 C. 0 C. CO ci) eu c— E cr 0D w C. 1111 (r) (.0) 0 C. 0 • NO u t and Housin E 0 10 o L) ('0I.) C. U1,— LL.V c:L. ..> 0 E 0 w L) 0 w 6 6 0 0 E c w 0 .. E 00 Page 73 of 213 +-1 i (%) S D 1- O V 4- ✓ vi IL_ st .0 CU . 0 C . — co +1 co .0 - u_ c0 +-1 = a a s = N 0 CCD 73-Q >o 2 N U ,= c _ c� v' O 4) 1- _ i .0 -0 _1 = c . = -0 is_ st 0- CO 0 CU 4 �O CO 1110 O >` L- -c _c -0 O H +-J • • Page 74 of 213 +-'-C > .in O O •0- CO 4A L O CO CU 0 a c +-' C . 4) c f6 CO L L cam) d.) co , V - co CAA O L co co c CU _ O • cNn 4-1C — O ▪ c- /i v + E c _c -0 a--N > O CT3v •O L C vi c L C -C CO 0 +-1 .- -0 L 0_ 0 V) taD o _C0 Q. �c d)CU -C > CO > cD L O 2 -ow 2 0 CI- 4-1 Q) O E +-+ 0 O d) Q Q) d) ca L 4J 0 f6 • Aut orize• ex•en•iture ,,,,«rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!o.!,! viCU 4-J C �O N N .E = CIA N }+ +, O CD •c 4) U v N 4--+ co > co 0_C6 . N c — co � C6 U Q c O to O E CD 0 •X cn co +, •E -0 c 0_+., bJD a.)cu m > co v ' — C Q '� c6 ' c ateJ Cli dJ U O a) N C bn E 0. u co O> W O • +_+ _cv ✓ > CD E co 0 D Q) TO ca gm Oc CU q_ 4a) O > N M• � Itt) 'i O : v N> o a a .`�° I - '� ag CD I CIA (.4 a v C Q ate.+ - aJo a) c E 4-I NI •— CO 0 • •20 L TS v TS 2 > > .W (D▪ C O O .� ai U= a E 3 a= � 0 0_ a 0_ u (1) CU cu m ,,,111111111111111111111111111111111 cu U Identify funding source/s • 1101\11\0\\0\\\\\\\\ • Identify an administrator • • CO L1J ,,,,«rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr",<-;; LHTFs sources include, but are not limited to: • a v cc • • Bond proceeds, ,,,,11•II«rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!�,, fit 414 Iltpt 000000000 111111111111111 0111111111111111 ,h11111111111 °1a�stiti»1�7 1reIIl4 1111111111111 4411 10000 V mal011 uuuuullw a�0\m vvn pmuuulolp m01111W. ���lllllll,�� 111111111111 oououu 611111111� uuuuuN1 v�Illlllllll 11111111111111111 tfit IIliil� 11 III tt4uu4411111 mu»m I ��11114111111111 IIIIIIfilgl u411111111�1 u,re„ttIIItt1 �11111IIIIN�� �1111i�44titititititititil W�mnvs ,mlllnlllll pmuo m ml III 1lslllnlo 1111 111111111 "�IIIII'� Wre„„ � IIIN 111 mu pullllolllmlllq Ill��lllili�l� IIII� ` II �� r �Ni r murrrr[ �IIIII m IIIIIIIII � Duuum 00Nno'Il�l 'rimu�u uuuull� 111 NhdnV 1NNNNN II,ttIIIllllu f NNHijVfl IU Nd'I e�1 mlvv NNtttt@ ruNNN Iarcremo u nmmom i1vV h1 vtl nl IoIUI 11 re �� eMNgr �N�fll il���tt l u�aa�a usV IuuuNOflflN mapNN �nnnN� �ttANI � '�NNNN ,l'Ivillilvilvilivil(Ivilvilvi(Ivill!, Ph Ills NNN �1 tOt? brere ill uun. 'NNNN� sttWll ouuuwo wm ,I yll�yu„ IIIIIII N reel �1�"+ iloulu IIU;�N\!fii11l1°l �Hi, Io°ii uEl 00 IIIIIIIIII Imofl� Il���1 Nr u I 116 IIIIIIIIIIIIII uAHuwl IuuuluU ;t;�IBJ MIIIIII�Illiiitill II NNN wuttml NINIIIII mlNmu Nrvremo attttttuuu Nttnk . aoU ��������������IIIIIIIIII� Sllllllllllllllllllllll Page 79 of 213 -0 Page 80 of 213 10.A. Shakopee City Council January 2, 2024 FROM: Chelsea Petersen, Assistant City Administrator TO: Mayor and Council Members Subject: 2023 Community Survey Update Policy/Action Requested: N/A Recommendation: N/A Discussion: Every two years the City of Shakopee engages in a survey through The National Community Survey. The most recent survey was conducted between August 17, 2023, and September 28, 2023. Surveys were mailed to 3,000 residential addresses in the community, and 400 were completed and returned. When adjusting for those that were returned due to being undeliverable Shakopee had a 14% response rate. Selected addresses had the option to fill out the survey and mail it back or complete it online. In addition, once the randomly selected addresses had the opportunity to participate, an open participation option was posted on the city's website and advertised through our social media platforms in order to solicit additional participation. All responses are anonymous, and for purposes of statistical significance the results were kept separate by grouping (randomly selected vs open participation). There are two significant benefits of using the same survey tool each time: we are able to see trends over time, and we are able to compare to similar benchmarks over time. Shakopee has used this same tool five times since 2014, and there are over 600 communities that use the same tool so the comparable group continues to grow. The full report is attached and examines many aspects of community livability including the safety, economy, mobility, natural environment, community amenities, and other aspects that make Shakopee a desirable place to live. The report will also be available to the Page 81 of 213 community along with previous surveys under the "Living Here" tab of Shakopee's website. While there is a lot of information in the reports, the following were outlined as Key Findings: Residents appreciate the overall quality of life in Shakopee, and the opportunity to be involved within the community: • 84% rated Shakopee as an `excellent' or `good' place to live • 89% are 'very likely' or `somewhat likely' to recommend living in Shakopee if asked • 87% are 'very likely' or `somewhat likely' to remain in Shakopee for the next five years, which is the highest rating Shakopee has obtained in that category Many aspects of the local economy received positive reviews, but residents show some concern about general affordability and their own economic outlook: • 65% rated the overall economic health of Shakopee as `excellent' or `good' • 59% rated the vibrancy of downtown/commercial area as `excellent' or `good', which is the highest rating Shakopee has obtained in that category • 54% rated the employment opportunities in Shakopee `excellent' or `good' • 23% responded that the impact on their family is likely to be 'very positive' or `somewhat positive' over the next six months. While this is quite low, it is similar to national benchmarks. Mobility continues to be a community strength, with usage rates for alternative transportation on the rise: • 65% rated the overall quality of the transportation system as `excellent' or `good'. This was a new benchmark added in the last few years so we can only see limited trends on this item so far. • There are several areas that Shakopee rated higher than the national benchmarks: traffic flow on major streets, ease of travel by car, ease of travel by public transportation, street repair, and bus or transit services. In addition to the standard set of questions, Shakopee typically utilizes custom questions in order to solicit community feedback on areas of particular interest. This year questions were asked about communication methods, parking in the downtown, and the organized refuse collection system Shakopee has had in place for many years. • When asked about the primary sources of communication respondents indicated their primary sources are the city's website, Hometown Messenger (now named Shakopee Snapshot), news media, postcards and flyers, and utility bill inserts. • When asked about support for installing parking meters utilizing a property tax expenditure, 81% were `somewhat opposed' or `strongly opposed'. When asked about installing a parking structure using the same funding method 57% were `somewhat Page 82 of 213 opposed' or `strongly opposed'. • When asked about the organized collection system currently in place, 72% of respondents said they'd prefer to keep a single hauler and utilize the savings provided by the city's contract, 20% had no preference, and 8% wished to change the practice to allow for multiple haulers. The open participation option was open for two weeks beginning on September 14, 2023 and received 127 responses. While the open participation are displayed separately, they do generally reflect the trends of the randomly selected sample. One major difference is how the open participants obtain their city information — social media and city emails play a much larger role in how these participants stay informed on city events. Given how they likely obtained information on the survey this does make sense. Additionally, the open participants `somewhat oppose' or `strongly oppose' (85%) the installation of parking meters, but `somewhat support' or `strongly support' (59%) the installation of a parking structure in the downtown area. When asked about the organized collection system in Shakopee, 78% said they would favor keeping the current system, 15% had no preference, and 6% would prefer the practice to change to include additional haulers. Budget Impact: N/A ATTACHMENTS: o Community Survey Page 83 of 213 THE NCSTh THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY SURVEY" Shakopee, MN The National Community Survey Report of Results 2023 Report by: National Research Center POWERED BY POLCO POICO Visit us online! www.polco.us ala0e,Menthe, .A.A iransnarencv itlitiali e POIXM,M,HCL,ON National Research Center at Polco is a charter member of the AAPOR Transparency Initiative, providing clear disclosure of our sound and ethical survey research practices. Page 84 of 213 Alb ut The II C sirm The National Community SurveyTM (The NCSTM) report is about the "livability" of Shakopee. A livable community is a place that is not simply habitable, but that is desirable. It is not only where people do live, but where they want to live. The survey was developed by the experts from National Research Center at Polco. Great communities are partnerships of the government, private sector, community -based organizations and residents, all geographically connected. The NCS captures residents' opinions considering ten central facets of a community: • Economy • Mobility • Community Design • Utilities • Safety • Natural Environment • Parks and Recreation • Health and Wellness • Education, Arts, and Culture • Inclusivity and Engagement The report provides the opinions of a representative sample of 400 residents of the City of Shakopee collected from 3,000 randomly selected households between August 17, 2023 to September 28, 2023. The margin of error around any reported percentage is 5% for all respondents and the response rate for the 2023 survey was 14%. Survey results were weighted so that the demographic profile of respondents was representative of the demographic profile of adults in Shakopee. Arts, & Culture / Fiinvitu' llneslt Safety Istobatty U7ri]Ptia�,.. Ecnosmammn,y° 511.1111111ty „le„SYICI. cxi+riay 11 n o, ti II°Mw the results are rep rted For the most part, the percentages presented in the following tabs represent the "percent positive." Most commonly, the percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, etc.). On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer "don't know." The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab "Complete data." However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in most of the tabs. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. CI. rm"mll benchmarks NRC's database of comparative resident opinion is comprised of resident perspectives gathered in surveys from over 600 communities whose residents evaluated the same kinds of topics on The National Community Survey. The comparison evaluations are from the most recent survey completed in each community in the last five years. NRC adds the latest results quickly upon survey completion, keeping the benchmark data fresh and relevant. The communities in the database represent a wide geographic and population range. In each tab, Shakopee's results are noted as being "higher" than the benchmark, "lower" than the benchmark, or "similar" to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Shakopee residents is statistically similar to or different (greater or lesser) than the benchmark. Being rated as "higher" or "lower" than the benchmark means that Shakopee's average rating for a particular item was more than 10 points different than the benchmark. If a rating was "much higher" or "much lower," then Shakopee's average rating was more than 20 points different when compared to the benchmark. The survey was administered after the COVID-19 pandemic, a time of challenge for many local governments. While we provide comparisons to national benchmarks, it is important to note that much of the benchmark data was collected prior to or during the pandemic. This may impact how your City's 2023 ratings compare to other communities' ratings from the past five years. 2 Page 85 of 213 Trends ver time Trend data for Shakopee represent important comparison data and should be examined for improvements or declines*. Deviations from stable trends over time represent opportunities for understanding how local policies, programs, or public information may have affected residents' opinions. Changes between survey years have been noted with an arrow and the percent difference. If the difference is greater than seven percentage points between the 2021 and 2023 surveys, the change is statistically significant. * In 2020, The NCS survey was updated to include new and refreshed items. Consequently, some of the trends may be impacted due to wording modifications that could have potentially altered the meaning of the item for the respondent. 3 Page 86 of 213 IMetlh° 411 5 ntliiuru,, survey r°liipliients All households within the City of Shakopee were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within the zip codes serving Shakopee was purchased from Go -Dog Direct based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service. Since some of the zip codes that serve the City of Shakopee households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the exact geographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipal boundary file. Addresses located outside of the City of Shakopee boundaries were removed from the list of potential households to survey. Each address identified as being within city boundaries was further identified as being within one of the six subareas. From that list, addresses were randomly selected as survey recipients, with multi -family housing units (defined as those with a unit number) sampled at a rate of 5:3 compared to single family housing units. An individual within each household was selected using the birthday method. The birthday method selects a person within the household by asking the "person whose birthday has most recently passed" to complete the questionnaire. The underlying assumption in this method is that day of birth has no relationship to the way people respond to surveys. This instruction was contained in the introduction of the survey. Conduction the survey The 3,000 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on August 17, 2023 and the survey remained open for six weeks. The first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate in the survey. The next mailing contained a cover letter with instructions, the survey questionnaire, and a postage -paid return envelope. All mailings included a web link to give residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online. All follow-up mailings asked those who had not completed the survey to do so and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again. About 3% of the 3,000 mailed invitations or surveys were returned because the household address was vacant or the postal service was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 2,922 households that received the invitations to participate, 400 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 14%. The response rate was calculated using AAPOR's response rate #2 for mailed surveys of unnamed persons.* It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a "level of confidence" and accompanying "confidence interval" (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is 95%. The 95% confidence interval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the survey results because some residents' opinions are relied on to estimate all residents' opinions. The margin of error for the City of Shakopee survey is no greater than plus or minus five percentage points around any given percent reported for all respondents (400 completed surveys). In addition to the randomly selected "probability sample" of households, a link to an online open participation survey was publicized by the City of Shakopee. The open participation survey was identical to the probability sample survey with two small updates; it included a map at the beginning asking where the respondent lives and a question about where they heard about the survey. The open participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on Septmeber 14, 2023. The survey remained open for two weeks. The data presented in the following tabs exclude the open participation survey data, but a tab at the end provides the complete frequency of responses to questions by the open participation respondents. 4 Page 87 of 213 Analllyzing thedata Responses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a "key and verify" method, where all responses are entered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from surveys completed on Polco were downloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses. The demographics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2020 Census and 2022 American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Shakopee. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the survey respondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, housing type, housing tenure, and area. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated using an iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.* The results of the weighting scheme for the probability sample are presented in the following table. NRC aligns demographic labels with those used by the U.S. Census for reporting purposes, when possible. Some categories (e.g., age, race/Hispanic origin, housing type, and length of residency) are combined into smaller subgroups. Unweighted Weighted Target* Age 18-34 8% 32% 32% 35-54 3 6 % 42% 42 % 55+ 56s 26% 26% Hispanic origin No, not of Hispanic, (Latino/a/x, or Spanish - 98o 93% 93 % Yes, II consider myself to be of Hispanic, La..,. 2 % 7% 1 Housing tenure Own 88% 84 Rent 12% 26% 26% Housing type Attached 41 o 41$ Detached 66% 59° 59% Race & Hispanic Not whine aione 9` 3 - 31 % origin vlllhite allone, not Hispanic or Latino 91 % 69% 69% Sex Mani 4 7`, 47% Woman 585„ 535535 Sex/age Man.18-3rf 15>r, 1 >< Man35-54 :14 20`i; 20 Man 55+ 24% 1.3% 1.3% \Alormen.18-34 4% 1.80 18% Woman 35-54 22% 22% 22% Woman 55+ 32% 1.3% 13% 5 Page 88 of 213 The survey datasets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), R, Python and Tableau. For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the "percent positive." The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, essential/very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating "yes" or participating in an activity at least once a month. On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer "don't know." The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab "Complete data". However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. C.iitet The City of Shakopee funded this research. Please contact Chelsea Petersen of the City of Shakopee at cpetersen@shakopeemn.gov if you have any questions about the survey. Study ns All public opinion research is subject to unmeasured error. While the methodologies employed for this survey were designed to minimize this error as much as possible, these other sources of potential error should be acknowledged, and can include non -response error, coverage error, recall bias and social desirability bias. Non -response error arises when those who were selected to participate in the survey did not do so, and may have different opinions or experiences that survey responders. For general resident surveys, where the results are meant to be generalized to the entire adult population living in households, the mailing lists based on the Delivery Sequence File from the United States Post Office may exclude certain types of housing units, such as those in multi -family buildings where mail is addressed to a named resident at the address rather than to a specific unit or where residents only receive their mail at a post office box and the geographic location of a residence cannot be determined, there may be a coverage error, although for most locations, this is minimal. Respondents may not perfectly remember their experiences in the past year (such as participation in social or civic events), and for some survey items they may answer in ways they think cast their responses in a more favorable light (recall bias and social desirability bias). Survey alllliidiity See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity at http,„//info.pol c u /Ils',.no u * See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at * Pasek, J. (2010). ANES Weighting Algorithm. Retrieved from hittps r;;, ^un p uf20t Mfg. Fullll �rarr�w,uake-ppd)po a Ip * Targets come from the 2020 Census and 2022 American Community Survey 6 Page 89 of 213 II (ey Ilf iii iirm 11 11 eslii oeunts aplprecliito the overallllll qulll"ity of III"ife liiurd Shakopee and the opportunity tbe liinv Flllved MOM the community. Overall, residents continued to give positive ratings to many measures of quality of life in Shakopee. About 8 in 10 favorably evaluated Shakopee as a place to live. Over three-quarters were pleased with their neighborhood as a place to live, Shakopee as a place to raise children, and the overall quality of life in Shakopee. Additionally, most residents positively evaluated the neighborliness of residents (58% excellent or good), the city's overall image and reputation (63%), and Shakopee as a place to visit (76%). Finally, nearly 9 in 10 respondents reported that they planned to remain in the city for the next five years and would recommend living in Shakopee to others. These relatively strong results are likely correlated with the positive ratings provided by residents regarding opportunities for engagement within Shakopee. At least 6 in 10 residents provided excellent or good marks for the opportunities to participate in community matters, opportunities to volunteer, and opportunities to participate in social events and activities; each of these results showed a steady upward trend over the past three survey implementations. The opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities (57%) and the opportunities to attend special events and festivals (69%) each saw statistically significant increases since the last survey, rebounding from the brief decline experienced in 2021. o�s"it"iv� , reviews, but re�sliident�s show some concern Ihou ��iauruy aspects of the oca ��nc�nnou�ny received Ilp gemera aft nd their onn ecirc uok. Residents offered high ratings of importance (88% essential or very important) to Shakopee's overall economic health when asked to assess priorities for the coming two years. A majority of residents (65%) positively rated the quality of the city's overall economic health, in line with benchmark comparisons. At least 6 in 10 praised the overall quality of business and service establishments and the overall level of economic development in Shakopee. The vibrancy of the downtown/commercial areas saw a statistically significant increase from 2021, with 59% providing excellent or good scores this year. While most evaluations related to Shakopee's economy were similar to the national benchmarks, results indicated that residents were less optimistic about their own personal economic outlook and the affordability of resources within the city. When asked what impact the economy would likely have on their family income in the next six months, only 23% anticipated that it would be very or somewhat positive. The cost of living in Shakopee received positive marks from less than half of respondents (41%). Other measures of affordability also showed signs of resident concern. Assessments for the availability of affordable quality housing (37% excellent or good) decreased significantly, scoring almost 20% lower than the previous survey iterations. The availability of affordable quality food (61%), the availability of affordable quality health care (69%), and the availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool (52%) also all declined from 2021 results but remained in line with national benchmarks. Overall, residents were generally satisfied with the current local economy in Shakopee; however, the high rankings for importance and low rankings for affordability and other forward -looking indicators suggest that this is an area warranting the City's continued focus. ran "ity continues to be a cu° run"ity strn tlh, lh use e rates fr alllternatiiive transport t"ion on the rise. Nearly two-thirds of respondents positively evaluated the overall quality of the transportation system in Shakopee. Many ratings related to mobility within Shakopee came in above national benchmarks, including traffic flow on major streets (66% excellent or good), ease of travel by car (87%), and ease of travel by public transportation (52%). Assessments of the city's street repair and bus or transit services also surpassed comparison communities, each garnering positive reviews from 6 in 10 respondents. Additionally, many measures for alternative transportation modes saw statistically significant increases from the 2021 survey, with a higher proportion of respondents reporting they had used public transportation instead of driving (21%), walked or biked instead of driving (68%), and carpooled within other adults instead of driving alone (47%). In items unique to this survey, residents were asked numerous questions about parking in Shakopee's downtown area. About 7 in 10 residents reported that they were very or somewhat satisfied with parking downtown. When asked to evaluate some potential downtown parking initiatives, only 19% supported the installation of parking meters, while 43% supported the building of a parking structure using property tax expenditures. 7 Page 90 of 213 IF alcets of I Iva i 11 iy Resident perceptions of quality and importance for each of the facets of community livability provide an overview of community strengths and challenges that are useful for planning, budgeting and performance evaluation. The charts below show the proportion of residents who rated the community facets positively for quality and the priority (importance) placed on each. Also displayed is whether local ratings were lower, similar, or higher than communities across the country (the national benchmark). Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole. (% excellent or god) 2015 20.17 20.19 202.1 2023 Overall economic health Overall quality of the Urarnsportatiion system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement vviith their community muu • 14411tiY 65% E..... (vs,, Iba:sic Ihirmarlk'') r444t arrA.:r.r tIIIIIVr 5 % 69% 4% 1tiw fillll4 ; ma Imfi ou 4 A 6.�rrrw.. 8 Page 91 of 213 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Shakopee community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. (% essentiiall or very important) 20.15 20.17 2019 202.1 2023 Overaill economic health Overaill quail ity of the transportation system Overaill design' or Ilayout of resildentilall and conrimerciall areas Overaill quail ity of the utiiiiity infrastructure Overaill feelling of safety Overalli quality of naturall environment Overalli quail ity of parks and recreation' opportunities Overaill health and welliness opportunities Overaill opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their commurility * Cornparison to the national benchmark is shown.. If no comparison is available, this is left blank., • 110 • 66% S 72 % 84 % s m a % 82 % s 1.. a 74 % at 71 % s111r 9 Page 92 of 213 IC, alll,an liiing performance and rtance Every jurisdiction must balance limited resources while meeting resident needs and striving to optimize community livability. To this end, it is helpful to know what aspects of the community are most important to residents and which they perceive as being of higher or lower quality. It is especially helpful to know when a facet of livability is considered of high importance but rated as lower quality, as this should be a top priority to address. To help guide City staff and officials with decisions on future resource allocation, resident ratings of the importance of services were compared to their ratings of the quality of these services. To identify the services perceived by residents to have relatively lower quality at the same time as relatively higher importance, all services were ranked from highest perceived quality to lowest perceived quality and from highest perceived importance to lowest perceived importance. Some services were in the top half of both lists (higher quality and higher importance); some were in the top half of one list but the bottom half of the other (higher quality and lower importance or lower quality and higher importance); and some services were in the bottom half of both lists. Services receiving quality ratings of excellent or good by 67% or more of respondents were considered of "higher quality" and those with ratings lower than 67% were considered to be of "lower quality." Services were classified as "more important" if they were rated as essential or very important by 74% or more of respondents. Services were rated as "less important" if they received a rating of less than 74%. This classification uses the median ratings for quality and importance to divide the services in half. The quadrants in the figure below show which community facets were given higher or lower importance ratings (right -left) and which had higher or lower quality ratings (up -down). Facets of livability falling closer to a diagonal line from the lower left to the upper right are those where performance ratings are more commensurate with resident priorities. Facets scoring closest to the lower right hand corner of the matrix ( higher in importance and lower in quality) are those that may warrant further investigation to see if changes to their delivery are necessary to improve their performance. This is the key part of this chart on which to focus. Facets falling in the top left hand corner of the chart (lower in importance but higher in quality) are areas where performance may outscore resident priorities, and may be a consideration for lower resource allocation. CY 80% 70% an 60% 50% Inclusivity and engagement Mobility Parks and recreation Safety Natural environment Health and wellness �.. Community design Education, arts, and culture 0 Utilities 0 Economy Median 60% 70% 80% 90% Importance 10 Page 93 of 213 ua iity of II Measuring community livability starts with assessing the quality of life of those who live there, and ensuring that the community is attractive, accessible, and welcoming to all. Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee. (% excellent or good) 20.15 20.1'7 ht Shakopee as a piace to (five The overallll qualliity of (life Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. (% very or somewhat likely) 20.15 20.17 (Recommend Iliiviing in Shakopee to someone who asks (Remain in Shakopee for the next fiive years Please rate each of the following in the Shakopee community. (0/% excellllent or g ood) Overall( image or reputation �Ia IU The overall quality of Iliife iin Shakopee, 2023 2019 2021 2023 goo 2019 • ,u1 lIliL 8 4 % S :Lad a vs. benchmark* �fUu 7 7 2021 2023 wuw .. k5555�'8 9 p i ,a6.nr�.al.a;mdrr fit' 8 7 % z°Ns,:N 20.15 20.17 2019 2021 2023 V 10 6 3 rz.`L111 l a.1`: Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is atra'i'able, this is left blank., 11 Page 94 of 213 Oveirallll confidence iin Shakopee govermmerat, 22:3 ovelrlinla Ilnlce Strong local governments produce results that meet the needs of residents while making the best use of available resources, and are responsive to the present and future needs of the community as a whole. Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee. (0/0 excellent or good) 20.15 2017 it Overall customer service by Shakopee eimplloyees aW IPublliic information services Please rate the following categories of Shakopee government performance. (% excellent or good) The vallue of services for the taxes paid to .Shakopee The overall direction that Shakopee is taking The job Shakopee government does at wellcormiing resident invollvement 111111111 Bxcei I e Zia 2019 quo 2021 muu 2023 1VIIt7 7 a hb a6.aLt.C.:M.;tm. dr:° vs. benchmark* 20.15 2017 2019 2021 2023 6 54 I i Mu �v:11.. r AP m,. Overall confidence iiira Shakopee government Generalllly acting iirn the best interest of the community Being (honest ms ma fVliu 55% moi fVIIIVu 5 "7 % 4IIII0u 5 ° �.t rr i,�N.:r° Page 95 of 2l3 Being open and transparent to the publlic linformiing residents about issues facing the community Treating all residents fairly Treating resiidents with respect 44. Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? (%/® excellent or good) The CO of Shakopee The FederalGovernment 4 6% S 4 6% -1511: 53% mou .40 63% in 2015 2017 20.19 2021 2023 68 % 37 % * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown.If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 13 Page 96 of 213 Oveirallll economiic health of Slhalkopee, 2023 IEcoirnOImy Local governments work together with private and nonprofit businesses, and with the community at large, to foster sustainable growth, create jobs, and promote a thriving local economy. What °impact, if any, do you thiink the economy wlillll (have on your family iincomme iin the next 6 months? Do you thiink the iimpact wiillll be:: Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole. (% excellllent or god) 0verallll economic health Very Iposli'tiive Somewhat posit live Neuter it Soirnevv hat negative Very neggatiive 40 20.1.5 2017 2019 2021 2023 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee. (0/0 excelIlleirrit or good) 20.15 20.1'7 Shakopee as a pllace to woirk Shakopee as a pllace to visit Please rate each of the following in the Shakopee community. (% excellllent or god) 0verallll quallity of business and service establlishments Variety of business and service es' tablliishrnents Vibrancy of downtown/coirnmerciiall area aiu 20.15 2017 miu mn 4116,5 vs. benchmark* 2019 2021 2023 2019 mu, miu t .1. . ..muu irrir,ar tititiU "7 6% lay: 2021 2023 wuu - tititi7 6 9 ww muw Page 97 of 943 Employment opportuni tiles Shopping opportunities Cost of living �s�AD, ------- Please rate the quality ofeach ofthe following services inShakopee. Ecomomicdeveoll oua 41 47% _ o�uJac 41% o�u�ar 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 so* �--41062� a3 mzaz What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: (9/6weiryar sornewhat positive) What impact, ilf any, doyou think the economy v,iUUhave nm youirfamnilUyincome inthe next 6nmamtllDoyou think the * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. ~~23%~ �1� Over allll quallity of the transportation system E n Shakopee, 2023 M o II 11 III'y The ease with which residents can move about their communities, whether for commuting, leisure, or recreation, plays a major role in the quality of life for all who live, work, and play in the community. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole. (% excellent oir good) Overallll quail ity of the transportatiion system E cce lent 2015 201'7 20.19 2021 2023 Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community. (% excellent or good) Traffic flow on major streets Ease of public parking (Ease of travel) by car lEase of travel) by public transpoirtatiion lEase of travel) by bicycle lEase of wallk'ing 06. 4 vs. benchmark* 20.15 2017 2019 2021 2023 • �IW a�iw n �qo„ you ti nII rug auu gum .n• 66% Higher 1111pVu .7 1 o -11f 7% ligher �IIIIU 52 % 63% 16 Page 99 of 213 Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (0/0 yes) 20.15 20.17 20.19 2021 2023 Used pubiic transportation instead of driving Carpoded with other adults or chndren instead of driving aione 1 I a Waiked or biked instead of driving Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee. (9/0 excellent or good) Traffic enforcement Traffic signai timing Street repair Street cieaning Street iighting Snow removai Sidewaik maintenance Bus or transit services 4\1', • 21% Yr d "r 68% 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 rI no, a! 60% 4IIII, ' ( il ',''., 1 ilr I ,I ei r ID 57% r,:, I ()I I ,I. e Y• 1' 62% • 41) 77% .4169% 111, S • 415. 73% 63% 4111, 1111111 L rill 1,11 62% Comparison to the national benchmark is shown., If no comparison is available, this is left blank., Page 100 of113 verallll desiign or Ilayout of Shakopee's resiidentiiall and commerciiall areas, 2023 Community das'ii in A well -designed community enhances the quality of life for its residents by encouraging smart land use and zoning, ensuring that affordable housing is accessible to all, and providing access to parks and other green spaces. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole. (% excellent or good) 20.15 20.17 2019 Overallll design or Ilayout of resiidentiiall and commelrciall areas Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee. (% excellent or god) 20.15 201'7 Your neighborhood as a pllace to hive Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community. (% excellllent or good) Wel111-pianned residential) growth 1111e1111•-pllanlrned commercial) growth 04111-designed neighborhoods 2019 2021 2023 AO 5 9 % vs. benchmark* 2021 2023 III 455titiv "7 9 s :11pax 20.15 2017 2019 202.7E 2023 sw lu md44 5 8 62 % a u I Iri A I e�ti:r' 18 Page 101 of 213 Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Public places where people want to spend time Variety of housing options Availability of affordable duality housing Overall quality of new development Overall appearance Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee. (0/0 excellent or good) Land use, planning and zoning Code enforcement 65% • 57% S 8.8 4, 54% • .44166% 20.15 2017 20.19 202.1 2023 4 9 -----------, 54% Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 19 Page 102 of 213 Oveirallll quualliity of the utility infrastructure in Shakopee, 2023 U'tiI it lies Services such as water, gas, electricity, and internet access play a vital role in ensuring the physical and economic health and well-being of the communities they serve. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole. (% excellent or good) 20.15 20.17 20.19 2021 2023 �o. °671 % S.C.rr�.a6. Overall quality caf the utility iinfrastructure Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee. (a% excellent or goy d) Affordablle high-speed Internet access Garbage collection (Drinking wateir Sewer services !Storm water management (Power (ellectriic and/or gas) ut'illiity vs. benchmark* 20..15 20.17 2019 202.1 2023 40 52% r ti.m l a mug 40 % Page 103 o? 13 Utility billing 6 5 % S :r Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 21 Page 104 of 213 Oveirallll feelliing of safety iin Shakopee, 2023 Sa fety Public safety is often the most important task facing local governments. All residents should feel safe and secure in their neighborhoods and in the greater community, and providing robust safety -related services is essential to residents' quality of life. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole. (% excellent or good) Overall° feelliiirng of safety Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: (% very or somewhat safe) Iln your neighborhood during the day Iln Shakopee's downtavvn/commerciiall area during the day From 'property crime From violent crime From fire, flood, or otheir natuirall disaster 20.15 2017 po 2015 20.17 20.19 20.19 2021 2023 2021 Flallt "7 7 i X.If11 A r Mk r vs. benchmark* 2023 1i44rt 9. S,r.� r rx •. 92 a fillllu 7 2 % kl, 7% e,r ��IIIUr 8 fiiS:f. irn:'11.. 22 Page 105 of 213 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee. (9/0 excellent or good) 20.15 20.17 20.19 202.1 2023 IPollice/Sheriff services Crime prevention control Ambulance or emergency rnedilcall services Fire services Fire prevention and education Emergency preparedness -41) "7 8 % 71% S r -4W 6 6 % s m 8 5% -111 8 "7 % 7 5% 6 5% a.r Comparison to the m ional benchmark is shown.If no comparison is available, this s left blank., 23 Page 106 of 213 Overallll qualllity of irnaturall enviironment lin Shakopee, 2023 Natural environment The natural environment plays a vital role in the health and well-being of residents. The natural spaces in which residents live and experience their communities has a direct and profound effect on quality of life. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole. (% excelllleirnt oir good) 20.15 20.17 Overall° quallity of natural) enviironmenrt Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community. (% excellllent or god) 20.15 20.1'7 Clleanllillness Water resources Airqualliity Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee. (To excelIlleirnt or good) IPreseirvatiion of natural) areas 2019 2019 • 202.1 2023 i afi dY1 h aY'C 202.1 • vs. benchmark* 2023 mS�yv "7 3 >r 20.1.5 201'7 2019 2021 2023 555�f 4% r��r,,� 24 Page 107 of 213 Shakopee open space Recyclling Yard waste pick-up 52 % -411 s r 6 "7 % 65 % * Comparison tone national benchmark is shown.If no comparison is available, this is left blank., 25 Page 108 of 213 1Palrlks and recreation "There are no communities that pride themselves on their quality of life, promote themselves as a desirable location for businesses to relocate, or maintain that they are environmental stewards of their natural resources, without such communities having a robust, active system of parks and recreation programs for public use and enjoyment." - National Recreation and Park Association Overallll quallity of parks and recreatiion opportunities, 2023 hoot Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole. (0/m excelIlleirnt or good) Overallll quallity of parks and recreation opportunities 111111111111111 2015 2017 2019 202.1 2023 Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community. (% excellllent or good) Ava'illab'illity of paths and wall k'ing trails Fitness opportunities Recreational) opportunities 4 °' "4II180 vs. benchmark* 2015 2017 2019 202.1 2023 mm Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee. (%/% excellllent or good) City parks Recreation programs or classes • so "7'7 % .rrr� laxr. a kiUu °7 3 h.rii l s.:Nr 2015 20.17 2019 2021 2023 �lliioi4 7 4 o raar: „;;c,,ar;tc.:3.,a ...ir. 26 Page 109 of 213 Recreation centers or faciiities 411 * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown.If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 7 4% S m r 27 Page 110 of 213 veirallll heallth and wellllness Heal th and e ness The characteristics of and amenities available in the communities in which people live has a direct impact on the health and wellness of residents, and thus, on their quality of life overall. olplportuniitiies iin Shakopee, 2023 v Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole. (% excellllent or good) 20.1.5 20.17 M' 0vera1111 heallth and wellllness opportunities Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community. (% excellent or good) Availability of affordablle quall'ity food Availability of affordablle quality heallth care Availability of preventive heallth services Ava'illab'illity of affoirdablle quall'ity merrtall heallth care 2019 2021 2023 mU� flllt^69 4 s Luria. vs. benchmark* 20.15 2017 2019 2021 2023 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee. (% excellent or good) IHkallth services ou .. 41, 1tititi11. 6 1 s �kti5f>� � •.72 wri:.. a 4 % S�ri�il:G° 20.15 20.17 2019 2021 2023 a6.w r.'L aM.�� drr 28 Page 111 of 213 Please rate your overall health. Please. rate your oveiralI health. °R * Corn pari son Lo Lhe nationa I bench rn ark is shown. If no comparison is a%/ai I able, th is is I eft blan k. 7�% on Page 112ofzm Education, arts, an t c U tul Ire Participation in the arts, in educational opportunities, and in cultural activities is linked to increased civic engagement, greater social tolerance, and enhanced enjoyment of the local community. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole. (0/m excellllent or good) Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Overall)) opportunities for educatiion, culture and the arts, 2023 00000000000000000000000 Irixcel eflt', 14°/a. 20.15 20.17 20.19 202.1 2023 Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community. (% excellllent or good) Opportunities to attend cullturall/art.:,/irnusiic activities Community support for the arts Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool IK-12 education' Adult educational) opportunities Opportunities to attend special events and festiivalls 54% +1Uil¢ sins. zip -era vs. benchmark* 20.15 20.17 20.19 2021 2023 oh mm 0 5"7 4 4 1UIIIVu s 520 t1 UUIVu "7 3 % 1UIIUlu 6 5 9 30 Page 113 of 213 Please rate the quality ofeach wfthe following services inShakopee. Public library services 2021 u«»*___~_� *Comparison to the nadona I bench mark is shown. If nocomparison is avai I a b1p, this is I eft bI a nk. 2023 _«118 3 % m�maa�r 31 Page 114vfz1n Residents' connection and engagement with their community, 2 u2. II usiiviity and elnlgaemlent Inclusivity refers to a cultural and environmental feeling of belonging; residents who feel invited to participate within their communities feel more included, involved, and engaged than those who do not. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole. (% excellent or good) 20.15 20.17 2019 202.1 2023 •110 4 9% °1 Residents' connection and engagement vviith their community Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee. (0/0 excellent or g*god) Shakopee as a pllace to raise children Shakopee as a pllace to retiire Sense of community vs. benchmark* 20.15 20.17 2019 2021 2023 -s�v . .1111, " 8 ' i mw OVU 41, fi4ta 5 4 % 32 Page 115 of 213 Please rate the job you feel the Shakopee community does at each of the following. (070 excellent or good) IVIaliding all residents feel vvell come Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Taking care of vulnerable residents 20.15 20 17 2019 2021 2023 6 5% S i„rni„1„ r •'"ssssssss I7v131:g%hez,.., —le 6 7 % r Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community. (0/® excellent or good) Sense of civic community pride Neighborliness of residents Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Opportunities to volunteer Opportunities to participate in community matters Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds '1111 5S 7...m96d„ 2015 20.17 2019 2021 2023 4 9 % 0 63 % 6 8 % 41, Comparison .to.the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 62 % 6 4 % s 1 a r 33 Page 116 of 213 Residents' participation I evel s Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes) Contacted the City of Shakopee for hell p or Information Contacted Shakopee ellected offilcilalls to express youir opilnilon Attended a ocall publlic meeting Watched a ocall public meeting Vollunteered your time to sorne group/activity Campailgned or advocated for a ocall issue, cause, or candidate \/oted In youir most recent ocall dection In general, how many times do you: (°/0 a few tiimes a week or more) Access the Internet from your home Access the Internet from your ce1111 phone 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 37% 9 6 111 vs. benchmark* %, • 10 % 110 s 1. 4119% s'Arri,:1„ar 20% 32% 20.15 2017 2019 2021 2023 se 9 4 % s r (0 9 6 % :I r 34 Page 117 of 213 Visit sociai media sites Use or check emaii Share your opinions online Shop online 6 S r --1110 97 % * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown.If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 35 Page 118 of 213 Custom questions Below are the complete set of responses to each custom question on the survey. By default, "don't know" responses are excluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter below. Include "don't know" No Ililow much of a source, iif at all, City socliiall media clhaunnneils are each of the follllowiing for you for gettiing information about the Ciity government and iits activities, events, and services? Ciity weIbsiite iilolnnetov n (Messenger News Ime°dllia City Ce>u,unc::iill Irnneet nngs annct it her pulblliic meet:lllrigs (Olive streamed or lin person) City elrnnaiills l::bostcards alrnd fllyers Major source Mllinor source Not a ^:souurice Mlallolr so0lrce 41 ii Iru 01 so au Irce Not a source Major source MI li n o Ir source Not a source Major source nor sou lrc:e Not a soulrice Major source V1linor soulrce Not: a )ulrice Major source nor source Not: a source Major source Mllinor source Not a ^sou,ulrce ty'tGlliit:y Ibiillll iiinserts liMajor source nor sou.urce Not a sou rcew Word of IrmaoLit lh Major saraulrce Mllinor source 25% 33% 42% 30% 43% 27% 32 44% 24% 30% 44% 26% 7% 37% 56% 18% 35 46% 2 9% 50% 21 29% 48% 24% 2 6 % 44% 36 Page 119 of 213 Jot a .source 30% nter actions with City staff (lin Iperson, 1p hone, IIVIajor source ema ill, or web) IMinor source Not as source 16% 34% 50% The City of Shia 11«ipee as contracted .A/ t h tlhirdhparty waste ha LiIiiiq companies to prey lide trash coillectlion to clity reslidents since roughiy 1968, Si Ince 1.993, the city has contracted with a slingie waste haulling comp_ II would prefer that the City continue the current practice w.. II would prefer that the City change their practice to allow Not sure no preference 72% 8 20% Please rate how satisfied, f at I 1, you are Very sat:lisflied yrilitlh pa r kling lin gener a 0 in downtown Shakopee (based on the tiilmes when you Ineed Somewhat satisfied 50 1.11 e wlhat Very dlissatishied 23% 49% 18% 10% Please indicate your level of SU pport for the following Potential initiatives in downtown Shakopee:: nstall parking meters, linci wiling a property Stronglly support tax expend lit to for H tial n st 0 0 at ion and ongoling costs for users nstall rig a parking structure, wthi constrttJctlion funded via property tax expenditure Sorne hat suPPort Somewhat oppose St rongiy oPPose St Tong y sup po rt Somewhat: sj pport Somewhat oppose Stronigly oppose 4% 15% 14% 67% 7% 36% 18% 39% 37 Page 120 of 213 National belrnclhlm irlk tables This table contains the comparisons of Shakopee's results to those from other communities. The first column shows the comparison of Shakopee's rating to the benchmark. Shakopee's results are noted as being "higher", "lower" or "similar" to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Shakopee residents is statistically similar to or different than the benchmark. The second column is Shakopee's "percent positive." Most commonly, the percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good). The third column is the rank assigned to Shakopee's rating among communities where a similar question was asked. The fourth column is the number of communities that asked a similar question. The fifth column shows the percentile for Shakopee's result -- that is what percent of surveyed communities had a lower rating than Shakopee. Please rate each of the Shakopee as ,.3 pllace to (live following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee. Your 'neighborhood as a pllac o hive Shakopee as a place to raise children Shakopee as a pace to work Shakopee as a pace to visit Shakopee as a place to retire The overall quality of life Sense of community Please rate each of the Overall economic health following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee Overall quality of the transportation sy as a whole. Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. ern Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overallll feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community Recommend Hiving in Shakopee to someone who asks communities i UJ a liar 84% 224 356 3/ liar 79% 208 318 34 Similar 78% 192 360 46 Similar 60% 1%5 352 50 _imi_lar 760 92 316 71 Similar 58% 237 357 33 Similar 77% 230 374 38 S:im:i:Lar 54% 219 325 32 ar 65% 168 310 46 ar 65% 61 254 76 rnilar 59% 149 303 51 S:izn:Liar 71% 98 245 60 n:i..1ar 77% 210 345 39 Sim:i.lar 76% 203 312 35 Similar 80% 140 251 44 Similar 69% 168 305 45 Similar 54% 199 307 35 Similar 49% 138 248 44 Similar 89% 113 310 63 38 Page 121 of 213 C Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Remain in Shakopee for the next five years Please rate how safe or Iln your neighborhood duriing the day unsafe you feel: Iln Shakopee's do ntovvn ommerciall area during the day From property crime From viollent crime From fire, flood, or other natural) disaster Please rate the job you feel Making allll residents feel) wellcome the Shakopee community does at each of the following. Attracting people froirn diverse backgrounds \/alluin_y Ip ing residents from diverse backgrounds Taking care of vulnerable residents Please rate each of the Overall quality of business and service establishments following in the Shakopee community. Variety of business and service establishments Vibrancy of downtown/commerciiall area Emplloyment opportunities Shopping opportunities Cost of (living Overall image or reputation Please also rate each of the Traffic flow on major streets following in the Shakopee community. Ease of public parking Ease of travel) by car Ease of travel) by publl'ic transportation Ease of tiraveill by Ib'icyclle Ease of vvallking VVellll•-pllanned residential) growth VVeIIII••pllanned commercial) grovvtlh 11Vellll•-designed neighborhoods communities Si_rn_l.ar 87% 83 308 73 S imil. ar 91 % 222 327 32 Si_m_lar 920 164 317 48 Simi. r 720 149 256 42 Similar B7`o 148 256 42 c=imi:L,a:r B8 0 53 247 78 S:im:i:La:r 65% 131 253 48 Higher 71% 37 250 85 Similar 67 % 87 251 65 Similar 57% 105 247 57 Similar 69% 155 312 50 Similar 55% 134 248 46 Similar 59% 116 292 60 Similar 54% 93 323 71 Similar 47 % 185 315 41 lilac 41% 103 303 66 ac 63% 231 351 34 higher 66% 50 326 84 nilar 71% 76 292 74 Hi her 87% 43 320 86 Higher 52% 45 294 85 Similar 63`, 87 320 73 Similar 77% 74 323 77 Similar 58% 58 249 77 S:imi.lar 58% 58 249 77 S:i.mia.a:r 620 90 247 63 39 Page 122 of 213 v o = o O Z V 0- Similar 65% 103 246 58 Similar 58% 143 298 52 Similar 57% 85 310 72 Simia.ar 37% 117 331 64 Similar 54% 123 321 61 Similar 660 224 330 32 S:im:i:La:r 73% 207 327 37 Similar 55% 155 229 32 Similar 72% 218 299 27 Similar 77 % 118 323 63 Similar 69% 162 300 46 Similar 73% 151 317 52 Similar 61% 157 297 47 Similar 69% 77 304 75 Similar 72 % 79 291 73 Similar 54% 66 295 77 Similar 57% 139 313 55 Similar 49% 153 246 38 Similar 52% 104 306 66 Similar 73% 147 308 52 Similar 650 104 299 65 Similar 49% 172 247 30 Similar 58% 171 299 43 Similar 63% 129 308 58 S:imi.lar 690 99 302 67 S:i.mia.a:r 68% 168 303 44 II Please also rate each of the Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the following in the Shakopee community community. Public places where people want to spend time Variety of housing options Availlabiillity of affordablle quallity housing Overall quallity of new devellopment Overallll appearance Cleanliness Water resources Air quallity Availlabiillity of paths and wanking tiraills Fitness opportunities Recreatiionall opportunities Availlabiillity of affordablle quallity food Availlabiillity of affordablle quallity health care Availlabiillity of preventive health services Availlabiillity of affordablle quallity mental) health care Opportunities to attend cullturall/arts/mmusiic activities Community support for the arts Availlabiillity ofaffordablle quallity chilldcare/preschool) K•-.12 education Adult educational opportunities Sense of civic/community pride Nlleighborll'iness of residents Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Opportunities to attend special) events and festiivalls Opportunities to vollunteer 40 Page 123 of 213 Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee °PI community. o +� a) e a, o o S a_ E E co Z ° a Similar 62% 168 304 45 Similar 64% 96 321 70 Similar 37% 281 326 14 S_imi.Lar 10% 265 296 10 Similar 19% 145 300 52 Similar 200 196 289 32 S:im:il.a:r 32% 148 303 51 Similar 140 227 293 22 Similar 81% 76 246 69 Similar 21 % 99 278 64 Similar 47% 94 295 68 Similar 68% 72 297 76 Similar 64% 135 312 56 Similar 62% 94 307 69 Similar 60 % 157 346 54 Similar 57% 107 304 65 Higher 62% 50 345 85 milar 77% 82 313 74 S-i_rni_lar 69% 113 334 66 Similar 73% 107 262 59 Similar 63% 114 313 63 Higher 62% 53 284 81 Similar 540 66 315 79 Similar 41% 189 338 44 S:imi.lar 52% 114 243 53 S:i.mia.a:r 71% 268 324 17 ll ortunities to participate iin community matter Openness and acceptance of the community tovvard peoplle of diverse backgrounds Please indicate whether or Contacted the City of Shakopee for hellp or in formation not you have done each of the following in the last 12 Contacted Shakopee ellected offic.ialls'to express your opinion months. Attended a Ilocall public meeting Watched a Ilocall p ibllic meeting Vollunteered your time to some group/activity Campaigned or advocated for a Ilocall issue, cause, on candidate Voted in your most recent Ilocall election Used publlic transportation instead of driving Carpooled with other adults or clhilldren instead of driving alone WNallked on bilked instead of driiv'ing Please rate the quality of Public information services each of the following services in Shakopee. Economic devellopment Traffic enforcement Traffic signal timing Street repallr Stireet cleaning Stireet II ghtiirig Snow re_movall Sidewalk maiinteruance Bus or transit services Land use, pllanniing and zoning Code enforcement Affordable high-speed internet access Garbage collection 41 Page 124 of 213 communities 0 N N a Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee. Drinking water Sewer services Storm vvater management Power (electric and/or ryas) utility Utility billing Pollice/Sheriff services Crime prevention Animal control Ambulance or emergency medical services Fire services Fire prevention and education Enroergency preparedness Preservation of natural areas Shakopee open space Recycling Yard waste pick-up City parks Recreation programs or classes Recreation centers or facilities Health services Public library services Overall customer service by Shakopee employees Please rate the following The value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee categories of Shakopee government performance. The overall direction that Shakopee is taking The job Shakopee government does at welcoming resident involvement Similar 62% 219 311 29 Similar 78% 17% 309 43 Similar 78% 104 320 6% S=imi.Lar 76% 12% 269 53 S:imil .r 65 % 159 288 45 Similar 780 206 36% 44 S:im:i:La:r 71% 182 344 4% Similar 66% 161 321 50 Similar 85% 206 315 34 Similar 87 % 230 334 31 Similar 75% 177 308 42 Similar 65% 167 310 46 Similar 54% 205 298 31 Similar 52% 196 296 34 Similar 67 % 188 328 42 Similar 65% 1%0 291 41 i_lar 74% 202 323 3% i_lar 70% 13% 318 5% Simliar 74% 103 306 66 Similar 75% 72 284 75 Similar 83% 199 320 3% Similar 77` 191 353 46 Similar 54% 1%5 358 51 Similar 55% 162 33% 52 S:imi.lar 57% 102 334 69 Overall confidence in Shakopee government 42 Page 125 of 213 52% 146 306 52 :4-3 o x a_v = E ▪ E o ce Z Ou d ll Please rate the following categories of Shakopee similar 54% 173 310 44 government performance. Generally acting in the best intelrest of the community Being honest Being open and transparent to the public 'Treating all residents fairly Similar 52% 1%2 301 43 3i-m-lar 46% 158 253 37 Ilnformiing resident. about Tissues facing the community ,,_imi. r 46 % 1%2 258 33 Similar 53% 166 30% 46 'beating residents with respect Simil.a:r 63 0 129 250 48 Overall, how would you The City of Shakopee S:im:il .a:r 68 % 1%3 353 51 rate the quality of the services provided by each The Federal) Government S:i.mi.l.a:r 370 123 293 58 of the following? Please rate how important, Overall economic health Similar 88% 173 286 39 if at all, you think it is for the Shakopee community Overall quality of the transportation system similar 66 % 175 245 28 to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall design on (layout of resiidentiall and commercial) areas similar 72 % 197 287 31 Similar 84% 203 245 17 Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall fed ing of safety Overall quality of natural) environment Similar 91% 144 287 50 Similar 82% 218 287 24 Overall quall'ity of parks and recreation opportunities Similar 74 % 229 246 7 Overall health and wellness opportunities similar 74 % 196 287 31 Overall opportunities for educatiion, culture, and the arts s irrti lar 71% 219 286 23 i-lar 63% 261 286 8 kesiidents' connection and engagement nnr'ith their community In general, how many times Access the' Internet from your horne sireliar 94% 141 245 42 do you: Access the' Internet from your cell phone Similar 96% 60 247 76 Visit social) media sites Similar 76 % 194 246 21 Use or check email) similar 97 0 126 247 49 Share your opinions online Similar 21 0 229 247 7 Shop onlllline Similar 58% 96 246 61 Please rate your overall heallth„ S:imi.lar 71 % 125 293 57 What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your 23 % 117 295 60 family income in the next 6 (months? IDo you think the Impact wi1l1l1 be: 43 Page 126 of 213 Custom elnlclhilnmalrlk to Ales This table contains the comparisons of Shakopee's results to those from a custom set of communities selected by the City. This cohort includes other Minnesota communities with similar demographic characteristics as Shakopee. The first column shows Shakopee's rating compared to the benchmark: results are noted as "higher" or "lower" if the average rating given by Shakopee residents is at least 10 points above or below the benchmark, and "similar" if it is within 10 points. The second column shows Shakopee's "percent positive", which is the combination of the most positive response options (e.g., excellent/good). The third column shows Shakopee's ranking in comparison to other communities where a similar question was asked, and the fourth column shows the number of communities that asked that question. The fifth column shows the percentile for Shakopee's result (the percent of communities that had a lower rating). j O a) � � C OY V g, C £ a m O au Similar 84% 22 27 22 S:imi.:Lar 79% 22 26 19 llar 78% 21 27 25 Similar_ 60% 19 27 33 Similar 76% 4 25 88 Similar 58% 22 27 22 Similar 77% 24 28 17 Similar 5466 22 27 22 Similar 65% 20 26 26 :lar 65% 11 23 56 nilar 59% 21 25 20 Similar 71% 18 21 19 Similar 77% 21 27 25 Similar 76% 24 26 11 Similar 80 % 17 21 23 Similar 69% 20 26 26 Similar 54% 21 26 23 Similar 49% 16 21 28 Similar 89% 16 26 42 Please rate each of the Shakopee as a Ipllace to Iliive following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee. Your neighborhood as a pace to (live Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole. Shakopee as a pace to raise chilldren Shakopee as a pace to work Shakopee as a pace to visit Shakopee as a Ipllace to retire The overall)) qualliity of Rife Sense of community Overall economic health Overall)) quallity of the transportation system Overall design on (layout of resiidentiiall and commercial) areas Overall)) quallity of the ut illity infrastructure Overall)) feelling of safety Overall)) quall'ity of flatiron environment Overall)) quallity of parks and recreation opportunities Overall)) health and wellness opportun'itiies Overall)) opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement riith their community Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do Recommend II'iving in Shakopee to someone who asks each of the following. 44 Page 127 of 213 Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Remain in Shakopee for the next five years Please rate how safe or Iln your neighborhood during the day unsafe you feel: Iln Shalkopee's downtown/commerc'iall area during the day From property crime Frorn violent crime From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Please rate the job you feel Making all residents feel welcome the Shakopee community does at each of the Attracting people from diverse backgrounds following. Please rate each of the following in the Shakopee community. Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Taking care of vulnerable residents Overall quality of business and service establishments Variety of business and service establishments Vibrancy of down town/commerciiall area Employment opportunities Shopping opportunities Cost of living Overall image or reputation Please also rate each of the Traffic flow on major stireets following in the Shakopee community. Ease of public parking Ease of travel by car Ease of tiravell by public transportation Ease of tiravell by bicycle Ease of vvallking \Nell((• -planned residential growth \/Vellll•-planned commercial giro In Well -designed neighborhoods Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the comrmuniity Public places where people want to spend time Page 128 oft 13 communities 0 N N a Similar 87% 14 26 50 Si_m_lar 91° 23 26 15 Similar 92% 18 26 34 S:i.znia.ar 72° 19 22 18 Similar 87% 18 22 22 Similar 88% 15 21 33 Similar 65% 16 23 34 1 ar 71° 6 22 77 S:imi. .l.ar 67% 12 23 52 S im_lar 57° 16 21 28 ;_i_mI_l.ar 69% 18 27 37 S:i.znliar 55 % 13 21 42 Si_rn il.ar 59% 7 22 72 Similar 54% 14 26 50 Sir nii 47% 16 26 42 Similar 41% 11 24 45 Si_mliar 63% 23 28 21 S.rmi:l.ar 66% 13 26 53 Similar: 71 19 24 25 :r 87 % 15 27 48 Similar 52% 5 25 84 Similar 63% 17 26 38 Similar 77% 12 27 59 Si_m_lar 58° 12 21 47 Similar 58% 12 21 47 62% 15 20 30 Similar 65% 11 20 50 Similar 58% 18 25 32 Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee Variety of housing options community. Availlabiillity of affordable quallity housing Overall)) quallity of view devellopmerrt Overall appearance Cleanliness Water resources Air quallity Availlabiillity of paths and wanking trains Fitness opportunities Recreatiionall opportunities Availlabiillity ofaffordablle quallity food Availlabiillity of affordablle quallity health care Availlabiillity of preventive health services Availlabiillity of affordalblle quallity mental) health care Opportunities to attend culltunall/arts/rmnusiic activities Community support for the arts Availlabiillity ofaffordablle quallity chilldcare/pireschooll K•.12 education Adult educatiioriall opportunities Sense of ciiv'ic:/cormmuniity pride Nlleighborll ines.s of residents Opportunities to participate iin social events and activities Opportunities to attend special) events and festiivalls Opportunities to vollunteer Opportunities to participate iin community matters Openness and acceptance of the community toward peoplle of diverse backgrounds Please indicate whether or Contacted the City of >hakopee for hellp or iinforrnation not you have done each of the following in the last 12 Contacted Shakopee elected officials to express your opinion months. Page 129 of4i13 o v 4-5 01 v � � O V n E c Similar 57% 20 28 32 mi:Lar 37% 21 27 25 Similar 540 17 24 33 3iml_.1ar 66 % 22 25 16 Lower 73% 24 27 14 Lower 55% 17 21 23 immle r 72% 25 25 4 Similar 77% 22 27 22 Similar 69% 21 26 23 r 73% 17 26 38 S-i_rnliar 610 16 24 37 Similar 69% 14 25 48 Similar 72% 13 24 50 Similar 54% 11 24 58 Similar 57% 13 25 52 Similar 4939 17 21 23 Similar 52% 17 23 30 :i.m:i.1a:r 73 % 16 25 40 Similar 650 15 24 41 Similar 49% 17 21 23 Similar 58% 15 23 39 Similar 630 13 24 50 Similar 69 % 11 24 58 Similar 68% 16 25 40 Similar 620 16 24 37 S:i.rtu_.l.a:r 64 % 10 25 64 Similar 370 22 25 16 S-i_mi_lar 10% 17 23 30 rr it a) 4 0 o U = - N Q = E i '8 ce Z d ll Please indicate whether or not you have done each of Attended a Ilocall publliic meeting the following in the last 12 months. Watched a Ilocall public meeting Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee. Vollunteered your time to some group/activity Campaigned or advocated for a Ilocall issue, cause, on candidate Voted in your most recent Ilocall election Used publl is transportation 'instead of driving Carpooled with other adult. or children instead of driving alone \/Vallked or biked instead of driving Public information services Economic development Traffic enforcement Traffic signal timing Street repair Str t cleaning Street Iliightiing Snow removal) S'idewallk maintenance Bus or transit services Land use, planning and zoning Code enforcement Affordable high• -speed internet access Garbage collection Drinking water Sewer services Storm water management Power (electric and/or gas) utility Utility biilllliiing Pollice/Sher''iff services Similar 19% 6 24 79 S.rm- a 20% 16 24 37 Simil. ar 32 % 10 25 64 S:i.mi:1.a:r 14% 11 23 56 Similar 81% 5 21 80 S-i_mil. ar 21% 7 23 73 S:im:ilair 47% 5 23 82 fi_mil.ar 68° 4 23 86 Similar 64% 18 26 34 -1ar 62% 14 26 50 S•i_mil. ar 60 ° 21 26 23 ;imi_lar 57% 17 26 38 ._,_i.m' - r 62 ° 6 28 82 S-i_mil. ar 77% 16 27 44 S:im:ila:r 69% 18 28 39 £Sm_1.ar 73° 23 28 21 Similar 63% 19 26 30 Simi .l.ar 62% 7 24 75 Si_mil. ar 54° 14 27 51 Similar 41% 22 26 19 Sinti..L 52% 15 22 36 11ar 710 22 24 12 S:im:ila.:r 62% 22 28 25 Sm_l.ar 78° 21 27 25 Similar78% 19 27 33 Simi .l.ar 76% 17 21 23 S i_mil. a r 65% 22 25 16 S-i_mi_l:ir 78% 23 28 21 Page 130 0#713 Number of communities v v tl Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee. Crime prevention Animal) control) Arbullance or emergency medical services Fire seirviices Fire prevention and education Emergency preparedness Preservation of natural) areas Shakopee open space Recycll'ing Yard vvaste pick-up City parks Recreation programs or classes Recreation centers or facilities Health services Public library services Overall customer service by Shakopee emplloyees Please rate the following The vallue of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee categories of Shakopee government performance. The overall direction that Shakopee is talking Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The job Shakopee government does at wellconning resident invollvement Overall confidence in Shakopee government Generally acting in the best in rt st of the community Being (honest Being open and transparent to the public Ilnforrniing residents about iissues facing the community ere Treating all residents fairly Treating residents with respect The Ciity of Shakopee Tlhe Federal) Government Si_m_lar 71% 22 27 22 S.rmj.i r 66% 21 27 25 Similar 85% 21 26 23 Similar 87% 23 28 21 Similar 75% 24 26 11 Similar 65% 22 25 16 Lower 54% 29 25 8 Similar 52° 24 24 4 Similar 67% 24 26 11 r 65% 14 23 43 Similar 74° 24 26 11 Similar 70% 17 26 38 Sii.l r 74 ° 8 25 72 Similar 75% 11 23 56 Similar 83% 17 23 30 Similar 776 24 27 14 Similar 54% 20 28 32 Simi:18.r 55% 19 26 30 Similar 57% 17 27 40 Similar 52% 19 25 28 Simi..L 54% 21 25 20 l.ar 52° 20 23 17 Lower 46% 19 21 14 Similar 4686 21 21 4 Similar53% 20 25 24 S:i.m11ar 63% 17 21 23 Similar 68% 22 28 25 Similar 37% 17 23 30 Page 131 oft 13 j O' a) O C E o Z d SiMi. .1ar 88% 5 23 82 Similar 66% 10 21 57 S i nilr r 72 0 8 23 69 nJ.Ln.L 84% 15 21 33 Similar 91% 1,1 23 43 Similar 82% 18 23 26 S:im:i:Lar 74% 21 21 4 1 a 74' 9 23 65 Similar 71% 13 23 47 Similar 63% 20 23 17 6.1 :Liar 94% 11 21 52 Similar 96% 2 21 95 Si_rn_lar 76% 15 21 33 Similar 97% 9 21 61 S:im:i:La:r 210 17 21 23 1 58% 6 21 76 Similar 71% 9 23 65 Simi:Lar 23% 5 24 83 II Please rate how important, Overall economic health if at all, you think it is for the Shakopee community Overall quality of the transportation system to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overalldesign on Ilayout of nesiidentiall and commercial) areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural) environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall Iheallth and wellness opportun'itiies Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community In general, how many times Access the Internet from your home do you: Access the irnternet fro m your cell phone Visit social media sites Use or check ernaill Share your opinions onlline Shop onlline Neese rate your overall heath. INhat impact, if any, do you think the economy vviillll have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: 49 Page 132 of 213 Fud IrenUs This table contains the trends over time for the City of Shakopee. The combined "percent positive" responses for each survey year are presented (e.g., excellent/good or yes). If an item was not included during an administration of the survey, no percentage will be shown in the table. If the difference between the 2021 and 2023 surveys is greater than seven percentage points, the change is statistically significant. It is important to note that in 2020, The NCS survey was updated to include new and refreshed items. Consequently, some of the trends may be impacted due to wording modifications that could have potentially altered the meaning of the item for the respondent. CO C ri M (V d O b in N N N N Please rate each of the following Shakopee as a pllace to Iliive aspects of quality of life in Shakopee. Your neighborhood as a pllace to °five Shakopee as a pllace to raise children Shakopee as a pllace to work Shakopee as a pllace to visit Shakopee as a pllace to retire The overallll quualliity of Iliife Sense of community 85% 80 88% 84% 79`0 774 83% 79% 77% 70`-<, 80% 78% 61% 60% 74% 60% 69`,:> 65 71% 76% 52% 44% 52% 58% 77% 53`f> 50% 57% 54%• Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole. Overall° economic heallth Overall° qualliity of the transportation system Overall design or Ilayout of iresiidennt'iall and commerciiiall areas Overall° qualliity of the ut'illiity infrastructure Overall° feell'irng of safety Overall° qualliity of natural environment Overall° qualliity of parks and recreation opportunities Overall° health and wellllness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, cullture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community 6 6 61% 6 9 6 5 7, 62`r> 65' 61% 59% 65 59 73% 71 9 64`#r 781 77 76% 72% 76% '76`<s 78%, 80% 77% 698 79% 69 66% 59`t, 52% 54`, 51% 495 Please indicate how likely or Recommend Iliiviing in Shakopee to someone who asks unlikely you are to do each of the following. Remain in Shakopee for the next five years 50 Page 133 of 213 84% 80 87% 8996 83% 7'7% 79% 87% I.0 0 m C NI 0 0 0 0 \ C \ C \ C•1 Please rate how safe or unsafe you II n your neighborhood during the day feel: In Shakopee's downtown/commerciiall area during the day From property crime From violent crime From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Please rate the job you feel the Malkng all residents feel welcome Shakopee community does at each of the following. Attracting people from diverse backgrounds tlilluing/respectiing resiidents from diiverse backgrounds Takiing care of vulnerable residents Please rate each of the following Overall quality of business and service establishments in the Shakopee community. Variety of business and service establishments Vibrancy of downtown/coimrnerci al area Emplloyment opportunities Shopping opportunities Cost of II iiviing Overall image or reputation 92% 93% 94% 91% 89% 86% 93% 92% 72% 72% 81% 87% 89% 88% 68% 65% 75% 71% 72% 67% 66% 57% 57% 53% 77% 5.3 57% 55% 32% 41% 46% 52 63% 56% 58% 54% 45% 45% 49% 47% 51% 42% 53% 4.L 48% 62% 63% Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community. Traffic flow on major streets Ease of public parking Ease of travel by car Ease oftravel by public transportation Ease oftravel by bicycle Ease of wallkiing Wellkrflanned residential growth Well -planned commercial growth VVellkdesgned neighborhoods Preservation of the hiistoricall or cultural character of the community Public places where people want to spend time 78% 66% 73% 62% 77% 71% 83% 80% 38% 40% 47% 52% 59% 66% 72% 63% 65% 72% 7c 77% >. 59% 58% 66% 62% 67% 65% 62 69% 62% 58% 51 Page 134 of 213 CD at r+ M N 0000 N N N N Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community. Variety of housing options Availability of affordahlle quality Ihousiiirng Overall quality of new devellopmruent 63 6.1 68 57 539 5= o 63`€> 55% 67 54"r Oveirallll appearance 68% 7372`i 66% Cleanliness S`u; 'r`,`€; 7 3`t, 73% Water resources 66% 55% Aiir qualliity 78% 71`is 85% 72" Availability of paths and wallkiing trails 639% 71% 86`o 772 Fitness opportunities 62=; 6.5 < 73% 69 , Recreational opportunities 63 0 62% 74 0 73 Availability of affordablle qualliity food 59° 64 s 76% 61 Availability of affordable quality health care 75% 73 77 0 69 Availability of preventive health services 76`0 76% 82 0 72 Availability of affoirdahlle quality irnentall health care 57% 54% 60 o 54 Opportunities to attend cullturall/airts/music activities 41 0 53`0 45 0 57% Community 4r% 49 Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool) 55° 6. 59% 52% K-.12 educatiion 70% 67`<, 58% 73% Adult educational opportunities 510 49° 61% 65 0 Sense of civic/community pride 50 % 49° Neighborliness of resiidents 54 % 48% 61 % 58 s. c s 47-% 53% OIPIPoirtu.une� to part'iciilPate iiin �ociiall events and ac:t'iviitiie_� Opportunities to attend special events and festiivalls 57 0 6. 56 0 69% Opportunities to volunteer 59% 55% 62'; 66`, Opportunities to participate iin community matters 51% 55% 58% 62 0 Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diiver... ` 8% Please indicate whether or not you Contacted the City of Shakopee for hellp or information have done each of the following in the last 12 months. .... 62 64 41 3.:3 :38% 37% 52 Page 135 of 213 LC) N N 0000 NNNN Please indicate whether or not you Contacted Shakopee elected officials to express your opinion 1.3% 12% have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Attended a local public meeting 16% 12% 13% 19% Watched a local public meeting 21% 21% 20% 20% Volunteered your tirne to some group/activity 31% 35% 23% 32% Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate .1 19% 13% 14% Voted in your most recent local election 86,-; Used pubilk transportatibn instead of driving 14 1.C:51 2 Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving allone : 7 33% VVallked or biked instead of driving 53% 4 59% 68% Please rate the quality of each of Public iinformation services 61% 65% 70% 64 the following services in Shakopee. Economic development 68% 64% 66% 6296 Traffic enforcement 74% 66 70% 60% Traffic si gnal ti m i ng Street repair 56% 55% 59% 62% Street cleaning 74% 68% Street Ilighting 58% 61% 75% 69% Snow removal l 73% 67% Sidewdk maintenance 68% 64% Bus or transit services Land use, planning and zoning 49% 57% 51% 54% Code enforcement 52% 57% 53% 41% Affordable high-speed internet access Garbage collection 84% Drinldng water 60% 62% Sewer services 82% 83% 83% 78% Storm water management Power (electric and/or gas) utility 53 Page 136 of 213 LC) N N 0000 NNNN Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee. Please rate the following categories of Shakopee government performance. Utility billing Polliice Sheriff services 85% 85% Crime prevention 75% 70% 80% 71% Anirnal control l 69% 75% 82% 66% Ambulance or emergency mediicall services Fireservices 91% 90% 93% 87% Fire prevention and education 82% 80% Emergency preparedness 58% 61% 81% 65% Preservation of natural areas 63% 54% Shakopee open space 59%. 62% 64% 52% Recycling 84 80 71% 67% Yard waste pick-up 66% 65% City parks 82% 79% 82% 74% Recreation programs or classes 69% 70% Recreation centers or facilities 66% 80% 76% 74% Health services Publiclibiraryseirvices Overall customer service by Shakopee emplloyees The value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee 47% 43% 56% 54% The overall° direction that Shakopee is taking 61% 54% The job Shakopee government does at welcoming resident involve. 46 47% .5 % 07% Overall confidence in Shakopee government Generally acting iin the best °interest of the community Being honest Being open and transparent to the public nformiing residents about issues facing the community Treating a°11 residents 53% 47% 55% 51% 59%. 54% 55% 48% 52% 46% 53% 46% 58% 52% 67% 53% 54 Page 137 of 213 Please rate the following categories of Shakopee Treating residents with respect government performance. Overall, how would you rate the The City of Shakopee quality of the services provided by each of the following? The FederalGovernment Please rate how important, if at Overall economic health all, you think it is for the Shakopee community to focus on each of the Overall quaky of the transportation system following in the coming two years. Overall design or Ilayout of residential and commercliall areas Overalill quallity of the uti Iiiity iinfrastructure • fe0ing of safety • quallity of natural enviironment Overall quaky of pairks and recreation opportunities • health and wellliness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, cuhture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community In general, how many times do Access the Internet from your home you: Access the Internet from your cell phone Visit social mediia sites Use or check email Share your opinions onlirie Shop onlliine Please rate youroverall health. LD 1-1 r-1 N N 0 0 0 0 NNNN 74% 63% 71% 76% 69% 68% 4 43% 4 37% 9. 86% 92% 88% 62% 66% 78% 66% 75% 72 88% 84% 94% 92% 78% 79%. 85% 82% 82% 74% 71% 74% 78% 71% 64% 71% 82% 75% 61% 63% 97% 94% 95% 96% 88% 76% 98% 97% 33% 21% 56% 58% 72% 60% 76% 71% What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your fa„. 30 % 28 6 . 23 55 Page 138 of 213 Meth s (*pen parti iii ii tli firm As part of its participation in The National Community SurveyTM (The NCSTM), the City of Shakopee conducted a survey of 3,000 residents and received 400 total responses. Survey invitations were mailed to randomly selected households and data were collected from August 17, 2023 to September 28, 2023. The results from this main survey effort represent the most robust estimate of your residents' opinions. After the above data collection period was underway, a link to an online open participation survey was publicized by the City of Shakopee. The open participation survey was identical to the probability sample survey with two small updates; it included a map at the beginning asking where the respondent lives (shown on next page) and also a question about where they heard about the survey. The open participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on September 14, 2023. The survey remained open for two weeks and there were 127 responses. The open participation survey data were not collected through a random sample and it is unknown who in the community was aware of the survey; therefore, a level of confidence in the representativeness of the sample cannot be estimated. However, to reduce bias where possible, these data were statistically weighted to match the demographic characteristics of the 2020 Census and 2022 American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Shakopee. The characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, housing type, housing tenure, and area. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated using an iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.* The results of the weighting scheme for the open participation survey are presented in the following table. * Pasek, J. (2014). ANES Weighting Algorithm. Retrieved from t .p /l,;ar . uur.urii.ia7 l r' Tura Bn.^orB'aufrollr r i,L'ceNq i/.' "LII f„,..1 11,-a roe Unweighted Weighted Target* Age 18••34 8` ; 33` , 35-54 55+ Hispanic origin No, not of Hispanic, (Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin Yes, II consider mysellf to be of Hispanic, Latilno/a/x, or Spanis••. Housing tenure Own Reim Housing type Attached Detached Race & Hispanic Not whiite allone origin Sex Sex/age White allone, not Hispanic or Latino Man Woman Man .18••34 Man 35.54 Man 55+ Woman .18-34 Woman 35••54 48`'s 44s 32` 4 1 `; 42 27` 2 6 % 9 6 `-3; 9 3 7 9 4 % 74 6° 15% 8 5 ` 89 46` 5 4 % 4 179 2 5i 4 26`€ 2 6 % 41 % 41 % 59`r, 5 9 % 29`'s 31% 1`, 6 9 % 46`s 47` 5 4 % 5 3`�, 1.5 1.5 18`- 20` 1 3 % 1.3 % 18`r, 1 8 % 2 2 `'s 2 2 %; Woman 55+ 2(1 Page 139-of 213 56 141; 13`o 5 MN shakoPe- Area 5 Areas of Area 3 Area 6 Area 1 Area 4 Area 2 3 1, 1,01. 1,0 r , f1,1,11,Y Mkt, 111b a 6 4 wee 2.5 5 1'1 57 Page 140 °f 213 Open participation siuIry 1 y results This dashboard contains a complete set of responses to each question on the open participation survey. By default, "don't know" responses are excluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter to the right. In some tables, the percentages may not sum to 100%; this is either because the question permitted the respondent to "choose all that apply", or for a question that asked the respondent to select one answer, it is due to the customary practice of rounding values to the nearest whole number. Iln which area of Shakopee do you live? (Refer to map above,.) 4 i None of these/II don't live in Shakopee 21 N--26 47' N=60 15% N=19 7 % N=9 9% N=212 0% N= Please rate each of the following Shakopee as a piace to live aspects of quality of life in Shakopee. Excellent Good Fair Poor 25% N-32 59% N-=74 13% N=-17 3% N=3 Your neighborhood as a piace to live Excellent Good Fair Poor 34% N-43 54 N=68 5% 76 11= 9 Shakopee as a piace to raise chilldren Excellent Good Fair Poor 30% N=32 44% N==43 19% N=-2 0 6% N=6 Shalkopee as a pllace to woirk Excellent Good Fair Poor 19% Ns16 33% N==2 8 40% N=-33 8% N=3 Shalkopee as a piace to visiit Excellent Good Fair Poor 28% N==33 47% N-=5 5 18% N==21 7% N Shalkopee as a piace to retire Excellent Good 6° N- 5 34% 58 Page 141 of 213 N=26 Please rate each of the following Shakopee as a pllace to retire aspects of quality of life in Shakopee. Fair Poor 35% N-26 25% N-19 The overall quality of life Excellent Good Fair Poor 14% N-17 59% N-68 24% N-28 3% N-3 Sense of community Excellent Good Fair Poor 13% N-16 5195 61-61 26% N-30 10% N-11 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole. Overall economic health Excellent: Good Fair Poor 13% N-13 52% N--54 30% N-31 4% 14-4 Overall quality of the transportation system Excellent Good Fair Poor 46% N-56 28% N-1:34 17% N-21 Overall design or Ilayout of residentialand commercialareas Excellent Good Fair Poor 9% N-12 44% 28% N--35 20% N-25 Overall quail ity of the ability infrastructure.? Excellent Good Fair Poor 31% N-38 49% N-60 12% N 14 8% N-10 Overall feeling of safety Excellent Good Fair Poor 31% N=46 49% N-62 166 66-20 4% N-5 Overall quail ity of natural environment Excellent 356 N=42 59 Page 142 of 213 Good 38% N-46 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole. Overall quality of natural environment Fair Poor 22% N-27 6% N=7 Overall quail ity of parks and recreation opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor 43% 19-65 32% N= 4 22% N-28 3% N=4 Overall health and wellness opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor 25% N-30 52% N=62 1-7 N-20 6% Overall opportunities for education, cukure, and Excellent: the arts Good Fair Poor 6% :11-8 51% N=60 24% N-28 18% N=22 Residents' connection and engagement with their Excellent community Good Fair Poor 6% N-7 56% N-65 27% N-:32 Please indicate how likely or unlikely Recommend flying in Shakopee to someone who you are to do each of the following. asks Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely 19-38 18% N-60 18% N-23 N-4 Remain in Shakopee for the next five years Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely 53% N:=65 39% N-48 5° N= 6 N-4 Please rate how safe or unsafe you Iln your neighborhood during tlhie day feel: Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe 80 102 15% 2% 0% 3 = 4 Iln Shakopee's downtoan/cornrnerciaIl area during the day Very safe 74% 9 60 Page 143 of 213 Please rate how safe or unsafe you 1 n Shakopee's downtown/commercial area during feel: the day Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe 20% N=25 2% N=3 1% N=1 3% N=3 From property crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe 34% N -6644 36% N=46 13% N=16 10% N6613 6% N=8 From violent crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe 63% N=79 30% N=38 6% N=8 1% N=1 0% N= From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe 58% N=74 37% N=4 5% N=6 0% N= 0% N= Please rate the job you feel the Making all residents feel welcome Shakopee community does at each of the following. Excellent Good Fair Poor 28% N=33 52% N=62 16% N 6,19 4% N=4 Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor 42% N 6,44 52% N=53 6% N=6 0% Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor 32% N=35 Taking care of vulnerable resildents Excellent 61 Page 144 of 213 20% N 61 Please rate the job you feel the Taking care of vulnerable residents Shakopee community does at each of the following. Good Fair Poor 27% N=22 38% N=3 16% N. Please rate each of the following in Overall quality of business and service Excellent the Shakopee community. establishments Good Fair Poor 12% N=1.5 56% N-7 1 17% N=22 15% N8819 Variety of business and service establishments Excellent Good Fair Poor 16% N=20 42% N 30% N= 3 8 12% N-15 Vibrancy of downtown commercial area Excellent Good Fair Poor 12% N=15 44% N.853 27% N=3 1 7 % N=21 Employment opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor 9% N:= 8 47% N=44 36% 8% N-8 Shopping opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor 1 0 N 1 3 23°5 N-28 45% 22% Cost of living Excellent Good Fair Poor 6% N-7 33% 44% N:::::54 18% N = Overall image or reputation Excellent Good Fair Poor 26% N-32 13% N9-16 Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community. Traffic flow on major streets 62 Page 145 of 213 Excellent 18% N 2 3 Please also rate each of the following Traffic flow on major streets in the Shakopee community. Good Fair Poor 38% N-48 35% N=45 9 N-11 Ease of publlic parking Excellent Good Fair Poor 15% N=19 42% N-52 23% N=29 20% N-25 Ease of travel by car Excellent Good Fair Poor 29% N=3b 50% N-62 15% N-418 6% Ease of travel by public transportation Excellent Good Fair Poor 5% N=3 31% N-20 31% N=19 33% N-21 Ease of travel by bicycle Excellent Good Fair Poor 9% .14=-8 56% N-49 24% N=21 N-9 Ease of walking Excellent Good Fair Poor 15% 63'2, N-71 12% N=13 10 N=12 VVell-planned residential growth Excellent Good Fair Poor 13% N=416 26% N=29 42% 18'6; N=20 Well -planned commercial growth Excellent Good Fair Poor 31% N=33 37% 21% N=2 2 Well -designed neighborhoods Excellent 63 Page 146 of 213 18% Please also rate each of the following Wellkdesigned neighborhoods in the Shakopee community. Good Fair Poor 43% N=47 22% N=24 18% N=19 Preservation of the historical or cultural character Excellent of the community Good Fair Poor 23% N='26 46% N=51 15% N=17 17% N=18 Public places where people want to spend time Excellent Good Fair Poor 8% N= 0 53% N=65 32% N=40 7% N=9 Variety of housing options Excellent Good Fair Poor 18% N=22 31% N=38 38% N=48 13% N=16 Avaabillity of affordable quallity housing Excellent Good Fair Poor 4% N=4 31% N=26 42% N=36 23%, N=20 Overall quality of new development Excellent Good Fair Poor 16% N=1 / 51% N=56 18% N=20 16% Overall appearance Excellent Good Fair Poor 16% N=21 58% N=72 19% N=23 N=9 Clleanlliness Excellent Good Fair Poor 22% N=28 56% N=,70 15% N=19 N=9 Water resources Excellent 64 Page 147 of 213 12% Please also rate each of the following Water resources in the Shakopee community. Good Fair Poor 42% N-50 33% N=4%) 13% N -16 Air quallity Excellent Good Fair Poor 20% N=24 65% N-80 7% N-9 Availlabillity of paths and vvallking trains Excellent Good Fair Poor 41% N=4 43% N .50 8% N=10 8% N-9 Fitness opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor 28% N=32 51% N-58 9% N=11 12% N-14 Recreational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor 14% N=1 58% N-69 18% N-21 10%, N-12 Avaabillity of affordable quallity food Excellent Good Fair Poor 17% N-21 51% N-62 20% N-25 11% N=13 Availlabillity of affordable quality health care Excellent Good Fair Poor 21% N-21 48% N=48 22% N-22 8 N =8 Availlabillity of preventive health services Excellent Good Fair Poor 26% N-26 56% N=57 14% N-15 11 4 Availlabillity of affordable quality mentalheallth care Excellent 65 Page 148 of 213 11% N=6 Please also rate each of the following Availlabillity of affordablle quality mentalIlleallth care Good in the Shakopee community. Fair Poor 43% N-23 31% N-516 14% N-8 Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Excellent Good Fair Poor 17% N-18 47% N-19 26% N-2 / 9% N-10 Community support for the arts Excellent Good Fair Poor 17% N-119 41% N-12 27% N-227 15% N-16 Avaiiabillity of affordable quallity chilldcare/preschooll Excellent Good Fair Poor 10% N-6 42% N-26 28% N-17 21% N-1:3 K-12 education Excellent Good Fair Poor 10% N-9 55% N-54 13% N-13 22% N-21 Adult educational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor 14% N-13 49% N-46 25% N-24 12% N-11 Sense of civic ,omimunity pride Excellent Good Fair Poor 17% N-118 42% N-45 29% N-31 12% N-13 Neighborlliness of residents Excellent Good Fair Poor 15% N-18 45% 66=54 31% N-37 10 N=212 Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Excellent 14% N-116 66 Page 149 of 213 Please also rate each of the following Opportunities to participate in social events and in the Shakopee community. activities Good Fair Poor 60% N-66 20% N=22 6% N-6 Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Excellent Good Fair Poor 21% N=26 48% N-57 23% N=2 / 8% N-9 Opportunities to volunteer Excellent Good Fair Poor 9% 14=8 56% 24% N=22 Opportunities to participate in community matters Excellent Good Fair Poor 18% N=19 48% N-52 18% N=19 15% N-16 Openness and acceptance of the community toward Excellent people of diverse backgrounds Good Fair Poor 12% 14=-13 59% N-64 22% N-24 7% N-8 Please indicate whether or not you Contacted the City of Shakopee for hellp or have done each of the following in the information last 12 months. No Yes 39% N-49 61% N-77 Contacted Shakopee elected officials to express No your opinion Yes 79% =99 21% Attended a local public meeting No Yes 75% N-94 25° N=31 tNatched a local public meeting No Yes 66% N-8.3 34° N:=42 Volunteered your time to some group/activity No Yes 76% =96 24% 58=30 Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, No or candidate Yes 14% N=,18 Voted in your most recent local election No 67 Page 150 of 213 18% N:-=22 Please indicate whether or not you Voted in your most recent local election have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Yes P..02 Used public transportation instead of driving No Yes 70% N=88 30% N=38 carpooled with other adults or children instead of No driving alone Yes 51% N=63 49% N=62 Walked or biked instead of driving No Yes 48% N = (.) 52% N=65 Please rate the quality of each of the Publlic information services following services in Shakopee. Excellent Good Fair Poor 20% N=20 48% N .50 23% N=2 4 9% N= 9 Economic development Excellent Good Fair Poor 17 N=1 6 33 N=33 36% N=3 14% N 1 4 Traffic enforcement Excellent Good Fair Poor 1 7 % N=1 45% N=43 28% N= 2 7 1 0 N 0 Traffic signal timing Excellent Good Fair Poor 15% N = 1 9 42%, N=51 33% N=39 1 0 N=12 Street repair Excellent Good Fair Poor 50% N=63 22% N=27 16% N=20 Street cleaning Excellent Good Fair Poor 32% N=41 49% N-=61 16% N=20 N=3 Street lighting Excellent 68 Page 151 of 213 17% N = 2 Please rate the quality of each of the Street lighting following services in Shakopee. Good Fair Poor 45% N=56 27% N =34 11% N=14 Snow removall Excellent Good Fair Poor 37% N=46 50% N=03 7% N=9 6% Sidewalk maintenance Excellent Good Fair Poor 24% N=28 60% N 0 10% N =12 6% N=7 Bus or transit services Excellent Good Fair Poor 7% N =5 54% N=377 19% N=13 21% N =15 Land use, planning and zoning Excellent Good Fair Poor 8 N=8 44% N=42 19% N=1 8 29% N=28 Code enforcement Excellent Good Fair Poor 5% N= 37% N=32 48% N=42 10% N:=8 Affordable high-speed Internet access Excellent Good Fair Poor 17 % N9419 52% N=58 17 N=20 14% N=16 Garbage collection Excellent Good Fair Poor 29% N=36 49% N:55 9 14% N=17 Drinking water Excellent 69 Page 152 of 213 35% N= 411 Please rate the quality of each of the Drinking water following services in Shakopee. Good Fair Poor Sewer services Excellent Good Fair Poor Storm vvater management Excellent Good Fair Poor Power (ellectric and/or gas) utility Excellent Good Fair Poor Utility billing Excellent Good Fair Poor Poll ice/Sheriff services Excellent Good Fair Poor Crime prevention Excellent Good Fair Poor AnimaII controll Excellent Good Fair Poor Ambullance or emergency medicall services Excellent 70 Page 153 of 213 Please rate the quality of each of the Arnbullairke or emergency rnedicall services following services in Shakopee. Good Fair Poor 51% N-38 6% N=4 1% N-1 Fire services Excellent Good Fair Poor 48% N=42 50% N-43 2% N=2 0% Fire preventionand educatilon Excellent Good Fair Poor 41% N9-796) 29% N-26 21% N=18 9% N-8 Emergency preparedness Excellent Good Fair Poor 21% N=16 53% N-42 10% '1 13 16% N-13 Preservation' of naturalareas Excellent Good Fair Poor 14% N==14 57% N-5'7 18%, N-19 Shakopee open space Excellent Good Fair Poor 12% N=714 42%, N-46 27% N=729 20% N=22 Recyclling Excellent Good Fair Poor 22% N=728 59% N=7 3 15% N=718 5% N=6 Yard waste pick-up Excellent Good Fair Poor 23% N=723 55% N=754 16% N=716 City parlks Excellent 71 Page 154 of 213 40% N=49 Please rate the quality of each of the City parks following services in Shakopee. Good Fair Poor 44% N=54 14% N=17 3% N=3 Recreation programs or classes Excellent Good Fair Poor 32% N=33 46% N=48 14% N=14 8% N=9 Recreation centers orfacilities Excellent Good Fair Poor 30% N=34 43% N=49 19% N=21 8% N=9 Health services Excellent Good Fair Poor 20% N=18 73% N=63 N=2 4% N=4 Publlic Ilibrary services Excellent Good Fair Poor 58% N:::::60 36% N=38 N = 3 3%, N=3 Overall customer service by Shakopee employees Excellent Good Fair Poor 46% N:::::48 N=44 10% N=10 3% N=4 Please rate the following categories The vallue of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee Excellent of Shakopee government performance. Good Fair Poor 10% N=12 42° 35% N=41 12° N=14 The overall direction that Shakopee is taking Excellent Good Fair Poor 13% N=15 44% 26% N=30 17% 'The Job Shakopee government does at wellcorning resident invollvernent Excellent 12% N=13 72 Page 155 of 213 Please rate the following categories of Shakopee government performance. The job Shakopee government does at wellcoming resident invollvement Good Fair Poor Overall confidence in Shakopee government Excellent Good Fair Poor Generally acting in the best interest of the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Being honest Excellent Good Fair Poor Being open and transparent to the publlic Excellent Good Fair Poor informing residents about issues facing the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Treating aII residents fairiy Excellent Good Fair Poor Treating residents with respect Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The City of Shakopee 73 Page 156 of 213 Excellent Overall, how would you rate the The City of Shakopee quality of the services provided by each of the following? Good Fair Poor 62% N-75 18% N-22 4% N-4 The Federal Government Excellent Good Fair Poor 8% N=9 41% 31% N=36 20% N-23 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Shakopee community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important 4995 N=60 37% N-46 14% N-17 0% Overall quality of the transportation system Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important 25% N-31 45% N-56 29% N-35 1% N-1 Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important 39% N-48 48% N-58 0% N- Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Essential Very important Somewhat important 48% N99:59 43% N-53 9% N-11 Overall feeling of safety Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important 50% N=62 44% N=b4 3% N=4 N-3 Overall quality of natural environment Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important 20% N=25 56% N-69 18% 66-22 6% N=4/ Overall quality of parks and recreation Essential opportunities 24% 55% 74 Page 157 of 213 Very important N-67 Please rate how important, if at all, Overall quality of parks and recreation you think it is for the Shakopee opportunities community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Somewhat important Not at all important 14% N"-17 7% N=8 Overall health and wellness opportunities Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important 47% N--`.)8 30% N-3 "1 Overall opportunities for education, culture, and Essential the arts Very important Somewhat important Not at all important 18% N--22 48'% N-=.'. 9 29% 6% Residents' connection arid engagement vvith t:heiir Essential community Very important Somewhat important Not at all important 36 N=-43 5% 14- 6 How much of a source, if at all, are each of the following for you for getting information about the City government and its activities, events, and services? City social media channels Major source Minor source Not a source 19% N-'23 10% N=-12 City uvebsite Major source Minor source Not a source 50% 40% N=-59 10% N---12 Hometown Messenger Major Source Minor source Not a source 34% N=-43 54% 12% N: °' 1 `i News media Major source Minor source Not a source 28% N- _5 44% 29% N-- 36 (City Council meetings and other public meetings (live streamed or in person) Major source Minor source Not a source 20% N=-9 `i 38% N __r48 42% City emaills Major source Minor source Not a source 53% N ---66 29'% N :.36 19% N=23 75 Page 158 of 213 How much of a source, if at all, are each of the following for you for getting information about the City government and its activities, events, and services? Postcards and flyers Major source Minor source Not a source 24% N-30 49% N=61 27% N-34 Utility bill inserts Major source Minor source Not a source 18% N=22 52% N-64 30% N=38 Nord of mouth Major source Minor source Not a source 27% N-33 55% N=68 18% N-23 interactions with City staff (in person, phone, email, or web) Major source Minor source Not a source 14% N-318 44% 42% N=52 The City of Shakopee has contracted with third -party waste hauling companies to provide trash collection to city residents since roughly 1968., Since1993, the city has contracted with a single waste hauling company for residential bras._ would prefer that the City continue the current practice w.. would prefer that the City change their practice to allow Not sure/no preference 78% -97 6% N=8 15% N-19 Please rate how satisfied, if at all you are with Very satisfied parking in general in downtown Shakopee (based on the times when you need it): Somewhat satisfied Somewhat dissatisfied Very dissatisfied 30% N=3 / 36% N-45 19% N=23 14% N-18 Please indicate your level of support lnstailling parking meters, inciuding a property tax Strongly support for the following potential initiatives expenditure for initial installation and ongoing in downtown Shakopee: costs for users Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose 5% N=6 10% N-12 25% N 2,30 60% N=73 installing a parking structure, with construction Strongly support funded via property tax expenditure Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose 18% N 2,22 41% N=50 19% N 2,2.3 22% N=27 In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your home Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks 1061; 2% 7% N=9 Access the internet frorn your cell phone Several times a day 76 Page 159 of 213 In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your cell phone Once a clay 3% N-4 A few times a week 1% N=1 Visit social media sites Several times a day Once a day A few timesa week Every few weeks Less often or never 79% 599 15% N=19 1% N-2 1% N=1 4% Use or check email Several times a day Once a day A few times a week 4% N-66 0% Share your opinions onlline Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never 2% N=3 8 N-10 27% N. 52% N-65 Shop online Several times a day Once a day A fe ti es a week Every few weeks Less often or never 17% N-20 11% N-14 27% 14::=33 40°, N-49 4% N:=5 Please rate your overall heallth., Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor 18% N-23 51% N-64 25% N=31 6% N-7 0° N= What impact, if any, do you think the economy will Very positive have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will Somewhat: positive Neutra Somewhat negative Very negative 0% N-1 25° N=32 38% 51-47 326 N=40 4% N-5 How many years have you lived in Shakopee? Less than 2 years 10'6 N=12 2-5 years 77 Page 160 of 213 14% N-18 How many years have you lived in Shakopee? sanyea rs ��2v'ears More than amyears Which best describes the building you live in? Single-family detached home fownhOUse o,duplex (may sharewansumnovni/sauove- conuummiumuranortment (have units above or bplow you) Do you rent or own your home? Rent Own About Ihiowmuch nsYour mmnthllyhousing cost for the place you live (including rpmt mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance and hornemwne,s'ansoc)atinm(HVA)fees)r ms Are you nrany other members ufyour household No aged *so,olluen ns How much do you anticipate yourhousehold's totaULess than$2S,000 incorne before taxes wnUUuefor the current year? (Please include inyour totaUincome money frornaUU $25.000tu$4e'9ee sources for "UUpersons living inyour hovseooldJ Are you of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin? No, not mHispanic, Launo/a/, o,Spanish origin Yes, nconsider myself mueof Hispanic, uxmn/a/x,wrsnanis- What )syour race? (Mark one ormore races to indicate what race YOU consider vomrseUftob�) Ame io`nn^uianmAlrska Native Pago1s1 vfz1a What 'is your trace? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be,) Black or African American White A race not listed 6 4 Iln which category is your age? 18-24 years 25'-34 years 35-44 years 45• 54 years 55-64 years 65-'74 years 75 years or older 4% N- `.; 29% N-3 6 19'% N'24 22% N=-2 8 10% N=-12 3% N=4 What: is your gender? Woman Man Ildentify in another way 54% N-68 45% N-35 7 Ilf you identify tin another way, how would you desc, Non -binary How did you hear about this survey? (Select all that the City's website apply.) The City's social media (Facebook, Twitter, Iln.stagram,.. Received an email from the City Iln a City newsletter or utility bill Iln my Facebook feed Saw it' in a newspaper article o ad (hard copy or online) Heard about it from a family mernber, friend or neighbor Polco's weekly email Polco social media post Other 3% N:=-4 23% N--29 67 % 9 --8 5 4% N=5 13, N=-17 1% N==1 0% N- 0% N 0% 0% N 79 Page 162 of 213 Complete set of .firequeln dies This dashboard contains a complete set of responses to each question on the survey. By default, "don't know" responses are excluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter to the right. In some tables, the percentages may not sum to 100%; this is either because the question permitted the respondent to "choose all that apply", or for a question that asked the respondent to select one answer, it is due to the customary practice of rounding values to the nearest whole number. Please rate each of the following Shakopee as a pllace to (live Excellent aspects of quality of life in Shakopee. Good Fair Poor 30% N=-11 8 54% N==211 16 N=61 15 IA- 3 Your neighborhood as a pllace to live Excellent Good Fair Poor 38° N=148 41 N=-16.3 18 N =-= 7 0 3% N=12 Shakopee as a pllace to raise chilldren Shakopee as a pllace to work Shakopee as a pllace to visit Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor 37 3J: 118 40% N=12 8 20% 3J: 6 3 2% 18 % N-52 421 N=119 35 N=100 51 N=14 275 N =102 49' N-°1887 19% N =74 5% N-=17 Shakopee as a pllace to iretire The overall quality of life Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor 21% N= 5 6 37% N=98 291 N=78 12`3 N'=-33 25% N==99 51% -19 9 20 3% N=12 80 Page 163 of 213 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee. Sense of community Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole. Overall economic health Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor 16% N==62 38% N-=146 37% N=143 4% N•--13 Overall qualliity of the transportation system Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall design or )layout of iresidentiall and comrnerciall areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feelling of safety Overall qualliity of natural) environment Overall gualliity of parks and recreation oppoirtun'itiies Excellent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair 14% N=52 51% N-188 27 N=101 N-a0 14% N=- 5 2 46% 32% N=-.1 2 1 9% N=-=34 20% N--72 51 N-=187 21% N==76 8% 1 28 23% N-90 540 [ 211 18 N=69 6% N-22 20% 55% N•=210 18 N=--69 6% N=-25 30% 50% N-190 14% N52 81 Page 164 of 213 Please rate each of the following Overall qualliity of parks arid recreation characteristics as they relate to opportunities Shakopee as a whole. Overall health and wellness opportunities Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall opportunities for education, culture, and Excellent the, arts Good Fair Poor Residents' connection and engagement with their Excellent community Good Fair Poor Please indicate how likely or unlikely Recommend living in Shakopee to soimeone who Very Ilikelly you are to do each of the following. asks Remain in Shakopee for the next five years Somewhat likely Somewhat unllikelly Very i.mllikelly Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely 6% 14=24 20% 49% N-18'7 26% N-=9'7 5% N-18 14% N--50 40% N-=144 37% N=-1 5 9% N-=32 13% N=46 36% N--=126 43% N 151 8% 1 2`-7 43% N-166 46% --.17 4 7% N 2'7 4% N 63% N-=232 24% N-90 6% N-23 7% N=26 Please rate how safe or unsafe you II n your neighborhood during the day feel: Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe 44//a1:,202 21% N=81 4% N--15 N=-=8 3% N-13 Iln Shakopee's downtown/commercial) area during Very safe the day Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe 58 14 33% N=-122 5% 3% N -10 1% N-4 82 Page 165 of 213 Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: From property crime From violent crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe 32% N=124 4C)% N-154 14% N=55 116, N -42 3% N=13 43% N-166 44% N=-1 /C) 6% N-24 4% N-13/ N=1 0 From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe 55% N=208 33% N=126 10% N-36 2% N-88 Please rate the job you feel the Making all residents feel welcome Shakopee community does at each of the following. Attracting people firom diverse backgrounds Valuing/respecting residents firom diverse backgrounds Exceillent Good Fair Poor Excel lent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor 24% N=86 41% N-149 29% N-103 7% N=24 27% N=9C1 44% N=149 25% N-85 4% N=14 23% 44% N=1414 26% N-87 N-23 "faking care of vulnerable residents ExceJlIent Good Fair Poor 18% 39% N-106 30% 13=83 13% N-35 83 Page 166 of 213 Please rate each of the following in Overall quality of business and service Excellent the Shakopee community. establliishment s Good Fair Poor Variety of business and service establishments Excellent Good Fair Poor Vibrancy of downtown/comrnerciall area Employment opportunities Shopping opportunities Cost of IIiiviing Overall image or reputation' Please also rate each of the following Traffic flow on major streets in the Shakopee community. Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair 21% 16-3833 47% N-=184 23% N=91 8 N=31 38 N •=-.14 4 33% N-=12 6 12% N--44 13 N-34 9 46% 16 1.71. 31 N =11'7 10% N=3'7 17% N=-50 37° N=109 35% 1Q=.10 4 11% N=-=32 15% N 59 31 N-=122 34% N 1.31. 20% N=-='78 8% N=30 33% N==124 44° N=164 15 N-5F3 15 48 N•=-180 31 7 N=-25 27% N=104 84 Page 167 of 213 Please also rate each of the following Traffic flow on major streets in the Shakopee community. Poor 7 N=2 / Ease of public parking Ease of travel by car Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor 20% 50% N=190 23% N-88 7% N=26 32% N-124 55% N=-215 12% N-48 1% H-33 Ease of travel by public transportation Ease of travel by bicycle Ease of wall king Well -planned residential growth Well -planned commercial growth ExcAllent Good Fair Poor Exc&Ilent Good Fair Poor Exc011ent Good Fair Poor Excel lent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Well -designed neighborhoods Excellent Good 13% N=25 39% N-073 33% N=61 15% N-28 19% N=53 45%, N-125 25% N-070 12% N-33 29% N-106 48% N-179 16% N-60 7% N=2 / 16% N-50 4-1% N=11 30 32% N-101 11% N=33 14% N-41 43% N-126 25% N-73 17% N-51 15% 14=51 47% 85 Page 168 of 213 Please also rate each of the following Well -designed neighborhoods in the Shakopee community. Fair Poor 29% N=100 Nur:34 Preservation of the historical or cultural character Excellent of the community Good Fair Poor Public pieces where people want to spend time Excellent Good Fair Poor Variety of housing options Avaiiabillity of affordable quallity housing Overall quality of new development Overall appearance Cleanliness Excel lent Good Fair Poor Excellient Good Fair Poor Exceillent Good Fair Poor Exceillent Good Fair Poor Excel lent Good Fair Poor 18% N=56 46% N-145 26% N=82 9% N-29 17% N=62 41% N-155 34% N-126 8% N=32 16% Nr-58 41% N=146 28% N-100 15% N =55 N-25 3()% N=97 93% N-109 30% N-98 8% N-2 45% N 8-155 41% N=140 6% N-20 11% N=42 55% N-2 15 29% N=115 5% N-21 \Nater resources Excellent 11% N-41 86 Page 169 of 213 Please also rate each of the following Water resources in the Shakopee community. Aiir quality Availlabillity of paths and wanking trails Fitness opportunities Recreational) opportunities Availlabillity of affordablle qu..uallity food Good Falr. Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Availlabillity of affordablle quality Iltealltlh care Excellent Good Fair Poor Ava'illabillity of preventiive health services Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor 44% N-160 3Uo N--=111 15% N=-=56 18% N-=-70 54% N 205 25% N-95 2% N-=9 33% N-=-126 44% N- 16'7 18% N=67 5% N`2(1 24% N-=92 44% N---168 26% N-100 5 20% N=76 53% N---200 22 Nur81 5% N °21 15% N-=56 46% N=1'74 28% N--=105 11% N=41 20% N -- 7 1. 49% N= 1'/ £3 28% N-102 3` N-11 18% N-=-63 54` N--193 24% N-=87 4% N--=14 87 Page 170 of 213 Please also rate each of the following Ava'illabillity of affordable quality mental) health Excellent in the Shakopee community. care Good Opportunities to attend culltuirall/arts/rnusiic activities Community support for the arts Availlabillity of affordablle quallity chilldcare/preschool) K-112 education Adult educatiionall opportunities Sense of civic/cornrrnunity pride Neighborlliness of residents Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair 14% N=-=30 40% N =-- 8 7 30% N=64 16% N - 3 5 16% N=5'7 41% N•=-142 34% N-=118 9% • 3 1%% N=52 32 % N=101 38% N=118 13% N=41 36% N-'76 31% N 65 18% N=-=3'7 25% N 66 48% N-=124 19% N=49 8% N=22 13% N=3'7 520 N-=14'7 24% N=6>8 12 % N-33 11' N-39 37% N•=-1 32 39` -139 12% N=-42 19% N- 74 38% N--148 33% N-=128 88 Page 171 of 213 Please also rate each of the following Ne'ighborlliness of residents in the Shakopee community. Poor 9% N=-=35 Opportunities to participate in social events and Excellllent activities Opportunities to attend speciiall events and festivalls Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor 17% N--=65 45% N=16'1 328 N=-119 6% N=21. 25% N•<I4 44% N--=162 27% N 9FS 4% N-`14 Opportunities to vollunteer Opportunities to participate in community matters Openness and acceptance of the community toward peoplle of diverse backgrounds Please indicate whether or not you Contacted the City of Shakopee for help or have done each of the following in the i nfonmatiion last 12 months. Excellllent Good Fair Poor Excellllent Good Fair Poor Excellllent Good Fair Poor No Yes Contacted Shakopee elected officials to express No your opinion Yes Attended a local public meeting No Yes Watched a local public meeting No Yes \/ollunteered your tiime to Borne group/activity No Yes 16% N=46 51 N-=143 26% 6% 13% N=41 49% --149 28% N=°85 10% N--31 29% N-9 3 7% N=22 63% -24'7 37% N-146 89 Page 172 of 213 Please indicate whether or not you Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, caaa.sFx, No have done each of the following in the last 12 months. or candidate Yes Voted in your most recent local ellect'ion No Yes Used publlic transportation instead of driving No Yes Carpooled with other adults or chilldren instead of No driving all one, Yes wallked or bilked instead of driving No Please rate the quality of each of the Publliic information services following services in Shakopee. Yes Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor 38 14% N -55 52% 1 206 48% 6 .t 7 18% N-60 45% N=149 34% N=9111 3° N=10 Economic devellopment Traffic enforcement Traffic signal timing Street repair Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor 15% N-45 47% N=143 29% N--89 9% N--=2 6 17% N=-58 43% N--146 30% N=104 10% N--35 13 N-51 44% 6 6/ 30% N=11:.3 13 N=50 15` N-59 46% N=-180 33% N--=126 6% N=23 Street cleaning Excellent 21% N--80 90 Page 173 of 213 Please rate the quality of each of the Street cleaning following services in Shakopee. Good Fair Poor 55% N=206 20% N=--73 4% N=-=1.6 Street lighting Snow removal) Sidewalk maintenance Bus or trairus'it services Land use, planning and zoning Code enforcement Affordable high-speed Internet access Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor 198 N=- 7 0 50% N,-189 22% N 84 9% N-=3_i 218 N.--- 8 0 53% N 201 19% N=72 8% N=--30 26% N=9'/ 11% N--40 15% N-31 46% N 92 43% 33% N 87 13% N-33 30% N-7 34% N-87 24` N=--62 18% N=65 33% 28% N==98 20% 15 2 91 Page 174 of 213 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee. Garbage c(Allect'ioin Drinking water Sewer services Storm water management Poweir (eIlectric and/or gas) utility Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor 26% N=99 450 N-=16 21% N=80 N=-28 20% N=74 42% N--15`-, 30% 9% N--32 23 N-984 55% N=',00 20% 23% N=-82. 55% N=19:3 21% N=72 2% N=6 28% N--10( 48% N °18'7 21% N=80 3% N--=12 Utiillity billing Poll ice/Sheriff services Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Crime prevention Excellent Good Fair 23% N-88 42 N =158 28° N=106 N-27 29% N- 91 50% N=-168 19` N-6`.; 23% N--'74 92 Page 175 of 213 Please rate the quality of each of the Crime prevention following services in Shakopee. Poor 7% N==2: Animal) contrail Ambulance or emergency rnedicall services Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor 20% N-=51 46% N=11'7 31% N=-"/ 8 3% 35% N 98 51% N=14:.3 12% N--)5 2% N= 6 Fire services Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor 40% N---113 48% N-=136 12% N=33 1% N--3 Fire prevention and education Emergency preparedness Preservation of natural areas Shakopee open spare Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Fxcellllent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Recyclliing Excellent Good 33% N=81 42% =.104 17% N=4:.3 8% N--21 19% N-243 46% N=1.01. 25% N==54 10% N=21 14% N-4t_ 39% N- 12 3 34% N=-10 "7 12% N=38 16% N-54 35` 116 39% N=-127 9% N-=31 22% N-° 8 3 44% N-=1_65 93 Page 176 of 213 Please rate the quality of each of the Recyclliing following services in Shakopee. Good Fair Poor Yard waste pickup Excellent Good Fair Poor City parks Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreation programs or cllasses Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreation centers or facilliities Excellent Good Fair Poor Heallth services Excellent Good Fair Poor Publliic IIiibrary services Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall customer service by Shakopee ernplloyees Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate the following categories of Shakopee government performance. The vallue of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee Excellent 94 Page 177 of 213 Please rate the following categories The value of service or the taxes paid to of Shakopee government Shakopee performance. Good Fair Poor 44% N=153 31% N=105 15% N=-=52 The overall direction that Shakopee is taking Excellent Good Fair Poor 12 ', N=-4 2 43% N=144 35% N•=-119 1 0 % N-=34 The job Shakopee government does at welcoming Excellent resident invollvement Good Fair Poor 16% N--45 41% N--116 N=93 11% N=--30 Overall confidence in Shakopee government Excellllent Good Fair Poor 10% N=32 43% N--144 35% 13% N--43 Generally acting in the best interest of the community Excellllent Good Fair Poor 11% N=38 43% N•=-145 30% N-=102 16% N-°54 Being honest Excellllent Good Fair Poor 12% N 37 41% N=129 35% N-=110 13% N-41 Being open and tiransparent to the Ipublliir. Excellent Good Fair Poor 35% 35% N=-11.5 19` N 60 informing residents about issues faciing the Excellent community Good Fair Poor 9% 1a 37` N 125 30% N =102 23% N--79 95 Page 178 of 213 Please rate the following categories of Shakopee government performance. Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Shakopee community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Treating all residents fairly Treating residents with respect The City of Shakopee The Federal Government Overall economic health Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent Good Fair Poor Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at ill important 12% N=-=36 42% N-=126 36% N=108 11% N-33 18 N=60 45% N•=-150 30% N=101 7% N.-__> 2 21% N-='l 46% N-170 28% N=101 5% 11% N=39 25% 36% --126 27% N=-=94 46% N•=-177 42 N-=159 11% N°43 1% N=4 Overall quality of the transportation system Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall design or layout of residential and Essential commercial areas Very important Somewhat important Not at allll important Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Essent'iall Very important Somewhat important 31% N-120 350 N--13' 7 28° N=108 6% N-22 29% N=114 43 N=170 24` N=94 4% N=-14 15% N-58 96 Page 179 of 213 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Shakopee community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Not at all important 1% 4 Overall feeling of safety Overall quallity of natural environment Essentiall Very important. Somewhat important Not at all important Essentiall Very important Somewhat important Not at all important 57% N-225 34% N=133 5% N-22 3% N=13 33% N-130 48% N-191 Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Essentiall Very important Somewhat important Not at all important 25% N-9E4 49% 93 23% N=90 3% N-13 Overall health and wellness opportunities Essentiall Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall opportunities for education, culture, and Essentiall the arts Very important. Somewhat important Not at all important Residents' connection and engagement with their Essentiall community Very important Somewhat important Not at all important 27% N=106 47% N-185 22% 4% N-16 25% N -98 46% N-180 24% N-94 5% N=20 1 % N -67 46% 14=1 /9 34% N-134 3% N=13 How much of a source, if at all, are each of the following for you for getting information about the City government and its activities, events, and services? City social media channells City website Major source Minor source Not a source Major source Minor source Not a source 25% N-95 33% N-128 42% N-163 30% N-117 43% N 4-1 69 27% N-104 97 Page 180 of 213 How much of a source, if at all, are each of the following for you for getting information about the City government and its activities, events, and services? Hometown Messenger News media Major source Minor source Not a source Major source Minor source Not a source City Council meetings and other public meetings Major source (live streamed or in person) City emaills Postcards and flyers Utility bin inserts Word of mouth interactions with City staff (in person, phone, email, or web) Minor source Not a source Major source Minor source Not a source Major source Minor source Not a source Major source Minor source Not a source Major source Minor source Not a source Major source Minor source Not a source 32 N=124 44% N=174 24% N=94 30 N-119 44% N=1 '74 26% N-101 7% N=27 N. 56% N=220 18% N=72 35% N:=138 46% N=182 29% N=113 50% N=195 21% N-84 29% N=114 48% N-187 24% N=93 26% N-101 44% N=173 30% N=118 16% N=62 34% 50 N-197 The City of Shakopee has contracted with third -party waste hauling companies to provide tirash collection to city residents since roughly 1968.Since 1993, the city has contracted with a single waste hauling company for residential tra.., would prefer that the City continue the current practice vv.,., would prefer that the City change their practice to allow.. Not sure/no preference 72% =286 8% N-30 20% 1', /8 Please rate how satisfied, if at all, you are with parking in general in downtown Shakopee (based on the times when you need it): Very satisfied Sornevvhat satisfied Somewhat dissatisfied Very dissatisfied 23% N-8 6 49% N=17 8 a % N ---67 10% N=35 98 Page 181 of 213 Please indicate your level of support installing parking meters, iinclluuding a property tax Stronglly.support for the following potential initiatives expenditure for initial installation and ongoing in downtown Shakopee: costs for users Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose installing a parking structure, with construction Strongly support funded via property tax expenditure Somevvhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose In general, how many times do you: Access the Internet from your home Several) times a day Once a day A tew times a week Every few Weeks Less often or never 4% N==13 15% N 5 14% N==53 Y„„„„, II N -2 4 5 3% 4% N=`-14 Access the Internet from your cell phone Several) times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few VA/eeks Less often or never F4 3% N--13 4% N 14i 1% N --2 4 N=15 Visit social media sites Several) tirne.s a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Use or check email) Several) times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never 60% 19 -239 10% N=38 6% N-2 3 3% N==13 21% N83 3 N-11 13 6 Share your opinions online Several) times a day Once a day A few times a week 9% 4% N--27 99 Page 182 of 213 In general, how many times do you: Share your opinions online Every few weeks 13% N=49 Less often or never 67% N3--2b5 Shop online Pllease rate your overall health., Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few vveeks Less often or never Excel lent Very good Good Fair Poor 16% N=62 6% N-24 36% N=143 28% N-111 14% N. 22% N-87 49% N-195 27% 13=-106 2% N-1 0% N=1 What impact, if any, do you think the economy will Very positive have on your .farnilly income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be:: Somewhat positive Neutral Somewhat negative Very negative 4% N-16 19% N=75 40% N-157 31% N=121 6% N-25 How many years lhave you lived in Shakopee? Less than 2 years 2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years More than 20 years 11% N-44 27% N=1 (J6 29% N-114 Which best describes the budding you live in? Single-family detached home Townhouse or duplex (may share walls but no units above Condominium or apartment (have units above or bellow you) Mobile home Other 58% N=232 24% N-94 17% N=66 0% N N-5 Do you rent or own your home? Rent Own 26% N-10:3 74% -294 About how much is your monthlly housing cost for Less than $300 the pllace you bye (inclluding rent, mortgage payment, property :tax, property insurance and $300 to $599 homeowners' association (HOA) fees)? 3% N=12 6% N-25 100 Page 183 of 213 About how much is your monthly housing cost 'for $600 to $999 the [Aare you Ilive (inclludiing rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance and $1,000 to $1,499 homeowners' association (HOA) fees)? $1,500 to $2,499 $2,500 to $3,999 $4,000 to $6,999 $7,000 to $9,999 5% N=21 20% N-78 4 6% N=182 15% N-60 3% N=11 N-4 Do any children .17 or under five in your No householld? Yes j 66% N "" 212 34% N-135 Are you or any other rnernbers of your household No aged 65 or Oder? Yes How much do you anticipate your householld's Less than $25,000 total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in yourtotal income money $25,000 to $49,999 from all sources for all persons hying in your householld.) $50,000 to $74,999 $75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 to $199,999 $200,000 to $299,999 $300,000 or rnore N-28 9% N=36 15% N-56 16% N= 6 0 24% N-94 18% N=68 7% N-28 4% N-14 Are. you of Hispanilc, Latilno/a/x, orSpanish origin? What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yoursellf to be.) No, not of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin Yes, II consider mysellf to be of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Span's.. American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Bllack or African American Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Ilsllander White A race not Ilisted N-26 N=13 14% N6-54 7 N=25 2 II n vvhich category is your age? 18-24 years 25-34 years 35-44 years 45-54 years 55-64 years Ji 5 N-18 28% 14 -11 0 13% N 6-52 3(J% 146-117 10% N 6-38 101 Page 184 of 213 II n which category is your age? 65-74 years 75 years or older 8% N=32 8% N=30 What is your gender? Woman Man Identify in another way 31% N=201 46% N-181 4% N=14 Ifyou identify in another way, how would you descriibe your gender? Agender/II don't identify ‘ivith any gender Non -binary Transgender woman Identify in another way 22% 24% N. 35% N-5 14% N-22 102 Page 185 of 213 The City of Shakopee 2023 Community Survey Please complete this survey if you are the adult (age 18 or older) in the household who most recently had a birthday (the year of birth does not matter). Your responses are confidential and no identifying information will be shared. 1. Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know Shakopee as a place to live 1 2 3 4 5 Your neighborhood as a place to live 1 2 3 4 5 Shakopee as a place to raise children 1 2 3 4 5 Shakopee as a place to work 1 2 3 4 5 Shakopee as a place to visit 1 2 3 4 5 Shakopee as a place to retire 1 2 3 4 5 The overall quality of life in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 Sense of community 1 2 3 4 5 2. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know Overall economic health of Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 Overall design or layout of Shakopee's residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Shakopee (water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) 1 2 3 4 5 Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of natural environment in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities 1 2 3 4 5 Overall health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts 1 2 3 4 5 Residents' connection and engagement with their community 1 2 3 4 5 3. Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don't likely likely unlikely unlikely know Recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks 1 2 3 4 5 Remain in Shakopee for the next five years 1 2 3 4 5 4. Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: Very Somewhat Neither safe Somewhat Very Don't safe safe nor unsafe unsafe unsafe know In your neighborhood during the day 1 2 3 4 5 6 In Shakopee's downtown/commercial area during the day 1 2 3 4 5 6 From property crime 1 2 3 4 5 6 From violent crime 1 2 3 4 5 6 From fire, flood, or other natural disaster 1 2 3 4 5 6 5. Please rate the job you feel the Shakopee community does at each of the following. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know Making all residents feel welcome 1 2 3 4 5 Attracting people from diverse backgrounds 1 2 3 4 5 Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds 1 2 3 4 5 Taking care of vulnerable residents (elderly, disabled, homeless, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5 6. Please rate each of the following in the Shakopee community. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know Overall quality of business and service establishments in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 Variety of business and service establishments in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area 1 2 3 4 5 Employment opportunities 1 2 3 4 5 Shopping opportunities 1 2 3 4 5 Cost of living in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 Overall image or reputation of Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 The National Community Survey M • © 2001-2023 National Research Center, Inc. Page 1 of 5 Page 186 of 213 THE NCS" The National Community Survey" Please also rate each of the following in the Shakopee community. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know Traffic flow on major streets 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of public parking 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by car in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by public transportation in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by bicycle in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of walking in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 Well -planned residential growth 1 2 3 4 5 Well -planned commercial growth 1 2 3 4 5 Well -designed neighborhoods 1 2 3 4 5 Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community 1 2 3 4 5 Public places where people want to spend time 1 2 3 4 5 Variety of housing options 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality housing 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of new development in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 Overall appearance of Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 Cleanliness of Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 Water resources (beaches, lakes, ponds, riverways, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5 Air quality 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of paths and walking trails 1 2 3 4 5 Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5 Recreational opportunities 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality food 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality health care 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of preventive health services 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality mental health care 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities 1 2 3 4 5 Community support for the arts 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool 1 2 3 4 5 K-12 education 1 2 3 4 5 Adult educational opportunities 1 2 3 4 5 Sense of civic/community pride 1 2 3 4 5 Neighborliness of residents in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to participate in social events and activities 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to attend special events and festivals 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to volunteer 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to participate in community matters 1 2 3 4 5 Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds 1 2 3 4 5 8. Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. No Yes Contacted the City of Shakopee (in -person, phone, email, or web) for help or information 1 2 Contacted Shakopee elected officials (in -person, phone, email, or web) to express your opinion 1 2 Attended a local public meeting (of local elected officials like City Council or County Commissioners, advisory boards, town halls, HOA, neighborhood watch, etc.) 1 2 Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting 1 2 Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Shakopee 1 2 Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate 1 2 Voted in your most recent local election 1 2 Used bus, rail, subway, or other public transportation instead of driving 1 2 Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone 1 2 Walked or biked instead of driving 1 2 The National Community Survey " • © 2001-2023 National Research Center, Inc. Page 187 of 213 Page 2 of 5 The City of Shakopee 2023 Community Survey 9. Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know Public information services 1 2 3 4 5 Economic development 1 2 3 4 5 Traffic enforcement 1 2 3 4 5 Traffic signal timing 1 2 3 4 5 Street repair 1 2 3 4 5 Street cleaning 1 2 3 4 5 Street lighting 1 2 3 4 5 Snow removal 1 2 3 4 5 Sidewalk maintenance 1 2 3 4 5 Bus or transit services 1 2 3 4 5 Land use, planning, and zoning 1 2 3 4 5 Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5 Affordable high-speed internet access 1 2 3 4 5 Garbage collection 1 2 3 4 5 Drinking water 1 2 3 4 5 Sewer services 1 2 3 4 5 Storm water management (storm drainage, dams, levees, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5 Power (electric and/or gas) utility 1 2 3 4 5 Utility billing 1 2 3 4 5 Police/Sheriff services 1 2 3 4 5 Crime prevention 1 2 3 4 5 Animal control 1 2 3 4 5 Ambulance or emergency medical services 1 2 3 4 5 Fire services 1 2 3 4 5 Fire prevention and education 1 2 3 4 5 Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations) 1 2 3 4 5 Preservation of natural areas (open space, farmlands, and greenbelts) 1 2 3 4 5 Shakopee open space 1 2 3 4 5 Recycling 1 2 3 4 5 Yard waste pick-up 1 2 3 4 5 City parks 1 2 3 4 5 Recreation programs or classes 1 2 3 4 5 Recreation centers or facilities 1 2 3 4 5 Health services 1 2 3 4 5 Public library services 1 2 3 4 5 Overall customer service by Shakopee employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5 10. Please rate the following categories of Shakopee government performance. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know The value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 The overall direction that Shakopee is taking 1 2 3 4 5 The job Shakopee government does at welcoming resident involvement. 1 2 3 4 5 Overall confidence in Shakopee government 1 2 3 4 5 Generally acting in the best interest of the community 1 2 3 4 5 Being honest 1 2 3 4 5 Being open and transparent to the public 1 2 3 4 5 Informing residents about issues facing the community 1 2 3 4 5 Treating all residents fairly 1 2 3 4 5 Treating residents with respect 1 2 3 4 5 11. Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know The City of Shakopee 1 2 3 4 5 The Federal Government 1 2 3 4 5 The National Community Survey M • © 2001-2023 National Research Center, Inc. Page 3 of 5 Page 188 of 213 THE NCS" The National Community Survey" 12. Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Shakopee community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Very Somewhat Not at all Essential important important important Overall economic health of Shakopee 1 2 3 4 Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 Overall design or layout of Shakopee's residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) 1 2 3 4 Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Shakopee (water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) 1 2 3 4 Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 Overall quality of natural environment in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities 1 2 3 4 Overall health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee 1 2 3 4 Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts 1 2 3 4 Residents' connection and engagement with their community 1 2 3 4 13. How much of a source, if at all, are each of the following for you for getting information about the City government and its activities, events, and services? Major Minor Not a source source source City social media channels 1 2 3 City website 1 2 3 Hometown Messenger 1 2 3 News media 1 2 3 City Council meetings and other public meetings (live streamed or in person) 1 2 3 City emails 1 2 3 Postcards and flyers 1 2 3 Utility bill inserts 1 2 3 Word of mouth 1 2 3 Interactions with City staff (in person, phone, email, or web) 1 2 3 14. The City of Shakopee has contracted with third -party waste hauling companies to provide trash collection to city residents since roughly 1968. Since 1993, the city has contracted with a single waste hauling company for residential trash collection. Contracting with a single hauler allows Shakopee residents to pay significantly less for the same level of trash collection services than those in communities that allow multiple haulers ($71.64 in Shakopee vs. $111.69 for the same level of service elsewhere, a 65% reduction in costs). However, the current system does not allow Shakopee residents to choose their waste hauler of preference. Please indicate the ONE option you most prefer: O I would prefer that the City continue the current practice with a single waste hauling company. O I would prefer that the City change their practice to allow multiple waste haulers, and understand this would likely come with an increase to my service fees. O Not sure/no preference 15. Please rate how satisfied, if at all, you are with parking in general in downtown Shakopee (based on the times when you need it): 0 Very satisfied 0 Somewhat satisfied 0 Somewhat dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 Don't know 16. Please indicate your level of support for the following potential initiatives in downtown Shakopee: Strongly Somewhat Somewhat Strongly Don't support support oppose oppose know Installing parking meters, including a property tax expenditure for initial installation and ongoing costs for users 1 2 3 4 5 Installing a parking structure, with construction funded via property tax expenditure 1 2 3 4 5 The National Community Survey " • © 2001-2023 National Research Center, Inc. Page 189 of 213 Page 4 of 5 The City of Shakopee 2023 Community Survey Our last questions are about you and your household. Again, all of your responses to this survey are confidential and no identifying information will be shared. D1. In general, how many times do you: Several Once A few times Every Less often Don't times a day a day a week few weeks or never know Access the internet from your home using a computer, laptop, or tablet computer 1 2 3 4 5 6 Access the internet from your cell phone 1 2 3 4 5 6 Visit social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Nextdoor, etc. Use or check email Share your opinions online Shop online D2. Please rate your overall health O Excellent 0 Very good 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 Good 0 Fair 0 Poor D3. What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: 0 Very positive 0 Somewhat positive 0 Neutral D4. How many years have you lived in Shakopee? O Less than 2 years O 2-5 years O 6-10 years O 11-20 years O More than 20 years D5. Which best describes the building you live in? O Single-family detached home O Townhouse or duplex (may share walls but no units above or below you) O Condominium or apartment (have units above or below you) O Mobile home O Other D6. Do you rent or own your home? O Rent O Own D7. About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance, and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)? O Less than $300 O $300 to $599 O $600 to $999 O $1,000 to $1,499 O $1,500 to $2,499 About how much is your monthly housing D8. Do any children 17 or under live in your household? O No O Yes D9. Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older? O No O Yes O $2,500 to $3,999 O $4,000 to $6,999 O $7,000 to $9,999 O $10,000 or more 0 Somewhat negative 0 Very negative D 10. How much do you anticipate your household's total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.) O $100,000 to $149,999 O $150,000 to $199,999 O $200,000 to $299,999 O $300,000 or more O Less than $25,000 O $25,000 to $49,999 O $50,000 to $74,999 O $75,000 to $99,999 D11. Are you of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin? O No O Yes D12. What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) ❑ American Indian or Alaskan Native ❑ Asian ❑ Black or African American ❑ Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander ❑ White ❑ A race not listed D13. In which category is your age? O 18-24 years O 25-34 years O 35-44 years O 45-54 years D14. What is your gender? O Woman O Man O Identify in another way 4 go to D14a D14a. If you identify in another way, how would you describe your gender? O Agender/I don't identify with any gender O Genderqueer/gender fluid O Non -binary O Transgender man O Transgender woman O Two -spirit O Identify in another way O 55-64 years O 65-74 years O 75 years or older Thank you! Please return the completed survey in the postage -paid envelope to: National Research Center, Inc., PO Box 549, Belle Mead, NJ 08502 The National Community Survey M • © 2001-2023 National Research Center, Inc. Page 5 of 5 Page 190 of 213 11.A. Shakopee City Council January 2, 2024 FROM: Nate Reinhardt, Finance Director TO: Mayor and Council Members Subj ect: City Bill List Policy/Action Requested: None Recommendation: Informational Only Discussion: These reports reflect the expenditures as recorded for 2023 activity. The following transactions are notable for this reporting cycle: • Global Specialty Contractors Inc: Pay Voucher 1, SandVenture Aquatic project. $483,213.70 • Miller Brothers Excavating: Pay Voucher 1, Windermere Neighborhood Park. $89,668.41 • Nuss Trucking: Purchased 2 Mack Snowplow trucks. $186,045.3 8 • RJM Construction: Pay Voucher 1, General contractor for SandVenture Aquatic project. $266,881.04 The following are PAYG TIF and Tax Abatement payments for 2023 2nd Half Tax Settlements: • All Saints Senior Living of Shakopee LLC $67,439.67 (Final Payment) • Entrust Datacard $46,957.00 • KEB America LLC $12,589.50 • Oatey Company $16,724.50 Page 191 of 213 • Rosemount -Emerson $289,940.00 (Final payment includes previous amounts held pending tax petitions) • Scott Co Treasurer $142,087.21 (Amazon final payment) • Shakopee Crossings Limited Partnership $10,908.87 Included in the check list are various refunds, returns, and pass through. Budget Impact: Operating and capital expenditures within the 2023 budget ATTACHMENTS: o Council Check Summary o Council Check Register ▪ Bill List Transfers Page 192 of 213 12/28/202314:35:36 CITY OF SHAKOPEE O 0) 0 J N CO 0 Council Check Summary e actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Payment amount may not r ai Z 0 O E N (D I,- CD 0 0 N 1� O O 1,- O 0 (D O CO I,- ( 7 0 O) O CO CO CO CO O 1` 7 CD O O N CO (O (D (D CO CO 1` OD 7 7 CO 1` CO O OD O) N co; (- OO O) V M (O (D W (O O) N N (D V t O Cr) CO (D V CO O CO N W (O V (D to co co (7 O 1 (A (O O) (O N V V Cr) O) O O) (O I"- C) M CO V CO O) N V N COO (D COI' (D ti D O CD. O) N O N CO (O ( CO (!] 7 (O 7 N N r r O) co V co V r r r OO co 0) N N O) CO N I� co GENERAL FUND 0 O O 02120 FORFEITURE 02180 LODGING TAX 02190 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RIVER CITY CENTRE PUBLIC SAFETY FUNDING PARK DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND TIF DIST#15ALL SAINTS/TRIDENT DATACARD ABATEMENT EMERSON ABATEMENT TIF DIST#17AMAZON TIF DIST#21 SHAKOPEE CROSSING KEB ABATEMENT CHERNE ABATEMENT SEWER FUND SURFACE WATER FUND EQUIPMENT I.S. FUND INFO TECH I.S. FUND BUILDING I.S. FUND SELF INSURANCE I.S. FUND SW METRO DRUG TASK FORCE ESCROW FUND O O 0 r N 1— O V (D CO O O O CO 0 0 (D 0 O O N N h N- 1` co co co co O O O co r N N V 0) (D O O O O O O O O O r 0) CO CO CO OD O O N N t V V V V V V V t 1— N- N- N- N- CO CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,601, 560.46 Page 193 of 213 Council Check Register 0 C O Total Amount PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CODE ENFORCEMENT 0319.6327 ANIMAL CONTROL PD/CITY 3,000.00 4 PAWS ANIMAL CONTROL 0 0 O O M TIF DIST#15 ALL SAINTS/TRIDENT 4071.6624 2023 2ND HALF TIF PAYMENT 67,439.67 ALL SAINTS SENIOR LIVING OF SH OFFICE SUPPLIES UNALLOCATED 119.95 AMERICAN MAILING MACHINES EQUIPMENT LEASES SWMDTF - STATE GRANT O N O CO m O 0 Z 855.00 APPLE FORD OF SHAKOPEE INC 0 0 W OFFICE SUPPLIES SWMDTF - STATE GRANT 5,979.50 ARMOR RESEARCH CO O 00 O7 00 w D SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT N O N m 0 0 20.00 ARROW HARDWARE & PAINT SHAKOPE PARTS FOR BRINE TANK. 0 O O N UNIFORMS/CLOTH ING W LL N N N 00 0 209.93 ASPEN MILLS 01 O N SERVICE AWARDS PERSONNEL - PAYROLL 250.00 AWARDS NETWORK 0 0 N BUILDINGS COMMUNITY CENTER 0674.6730 AGE -FRIENDLY MN GRANT PATIO INSTALL FOR GRANT 13,844.00 AXEL H OHMAN INC W V J 0 d O m 0 LANDRY AND ALESSI-AXON 845.00 AXON ENTERPRISES INC MINOR EQUIP (NOT CAPITALIZED) TRIBAL SERVICES 0352.6204 AXON ENTERPRISES INC MINOR EQUIP (NOT CAPITALIZED) TRIBAL SERVICES 0352.6204 AXON POLICE DEPARTMENT AXON ENTERPRISES INC 0 O O O O O • O O • O O co O O O N N 0 0 O O O UNIFORMS/CLOTH ING N N (71 O 0 BOOT ALLOWANCE - SCOTT B 225.00 BLOM,SCOTT 0 O N N ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSULTANTS SAN24-001 W END LIFT STATION N M w CO 00 w 832.50 BOLTON & MENK INC C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND O r on N 0 0 w BLDR 012481 7462 WATER ST 2,500.00 BRANDLANDERSON HOMES C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2370 BLDR 014183 7653 WATERS EDGE 2,500.00 BRANDLANDERSON HOMES C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2370 BLDR 013427 7620 WATERS EDGEF 2,500.00 BRANDLANDERSON HOMES EROSION CONTROL PAYABLE ESCROW FUND oo 0 m N 0 O BLDR 012481 7462 WATER ST 1,500.00 BRANDLANDERSON HOMES 00 4- 0 v aq 0_ Page 194 of 213 Council Check Register 0 f) O O C 01 Total Amount EROSION CONTROL PAYABLE ESCROW FUND EROSION CONTROL PAYABLE ESCROW FUND RESID LANDSCAPE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND N 00 00 0 M M M N N O O O ▪ v 0 o o 00 00 00 BLDR 014183 7653 WATERS EDGE 1,500.00 BRANDLANDERSON HOMES BLDR 013427 7620 WATERS EDGEF 1,500.00 BRANDLANDERSON HOMES BLDR 012481 7462 WATER ST 3,000.00 BRANDLANDERSON HOMES RESID LANDSCAPE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2372 BLDR 014183 7653 WATERS EDGE 3,000.00 BRANDLANDERSON HOMES RESID LANDSCAPE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2372 BLDR 013427 7620 WATERS EDGE 3,000.00 BRANDLANDERSON HOMES 0 O 0 O 00 w J a a 0 0 0621.6202 AGE -FRIENDLY MN GRANT 752.11 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS N n 2301.6765 BLINDS FOR RCC PURCHASE/INSTAL 14,186.48 BUDGET BLINDS co co 7 PAVEMENT PRESERVATION r w LLJ 00 0421.6322 JPA ADMIN FEE 2023 3,125.63 BURNSVILLE, CITY OF WAGES TASK FORCE SWMDTF - STATE GRANT 8025.6003 M O u LLJ 0 CARVER COUNTY WAGES TASK FORCE SWMDTF - STATE GRANT M O 0 z CARVER COUNTY WAGES TASK FORCE SWMDTF - STATE GRANT 8025.6003 M N 0 u 0 CARVER COUNTY OFFICE SUPPLIES SWMDTF - STATE GRANT 8025.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES CARVER COUNTY CONFERENCE/SCHOOL/TRAINING-ALL SWMDTF - FEDERAL FORFEITURES N 00 00 CO BCA TRAINING- THEIS CARVER COUNTY CONFERENCE/SCHOOL/TRAINING-ALL SWMDTF - FEDERAL FORFEITURES 8828.6472 MICROTEL LODGING- THEIS CARVER COUNTY M 0 0 0 0 0 0, O 0 0 0 0 h N O O O O lf) N 0 0 0 M r, 00 M 00 Ln In N M M M M M 00 0 0 0 Q Q Q Q l7 C7 l7 l7 RIVER CITY CENTRE 2300.6365 SUITE 275 MAAZ GAS RCC CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVCIES IN RIVER CITY CENTRE 2300.6365 SUITE 275 MAAZ GAS RCC CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVCIES IN RIVER CITY CENTRE 2300.6365 SUITE 225 RCC GAS CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVCIES IN PR19-002 SHAKOPEE MARINA 6876.6365 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVCIES IN T O M 00 In O co N M O 00 O 00 00 M 1 N z • z z z z FORMS/CLOTH FORMS/CLOTH FORMS/CLOTH FORMS/CLOTH FORMS/CLOTH z z z z z DDDDD SEWER MANAGEMENT SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT N N N N O O O V NH M V V O N O O O N N JT BT BG BE CS LL CR TS MR GH TS SB TM TK KW DB JS MF JF 00 00 U a w w 0 a CC CC CC CC CC O 0 0 0 0 Q Q Q Q Q z z z z z UUUUU r, O O CO d- 00 O O O O 00 00 r 00 ▪ O N f0 O • LD z z z z z FORMS/CLOTH FORMS/CLOTH FORMS/CLOTH FORMS/CLOTH FORMS/CLOTH z z z z z DDDDD SEWER MANAGEMENT SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT NNNCNN O O O O O V N M V O N. N. O O O N JT BT BG BE CS LL CR TS MR GH TS SB TM TK KW DB JS MF JF d 0 0 0 a CL CC CC CC O 0 0 0 0 • UUUU Q Q Q Q Q zzzzz UUUUU N 00 ▪ O CO N 00 O O O O0 00 00 h 00 Lf) O N 0 0 M Page 195 of 213 Council Check Register 0 z 00 0 0) B d a 0 co f) O 0 O 0 Lam 1C w 0 m Total Amount PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC SAFETY FUNDING 2500.6327 Lo 0 0 CO 8,500.00 CNH ARCHITECTS EQUIPMENT LEASES LU 3- LL 0321.6420 0 u 2 0 u COMCAST BUSINESS w a 0 0 INFO TECH I.S. FUND CITY HALL CABLE COMCAST BUSINESS 0 M N O • M N 00 N 0 EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 7731.6240 596.53 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC M 0 N BA22-015 SANDVENTURE RENOVATIO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6931.6327 12,361.50 CONFLUENCE 0 m N ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES 0 (1,447.58) CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU FILING FEES LODGING TAX 00 O 00 CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU LODGING TAX LODGING TAX 2180.6320 CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU CO 00 00 0 Cr 0 ` 00 00 N 0 O O N PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PERSONNEL - PAYROLL 00 00 00 0 0 W W W 00 00 V V V V V Ce • CC • CC CC CC w w w w w Lil VI In VI Lil Q Q Q Q Q Z Z Z Z Z O 0 0 0 0 UJ VI til V) 00 VI VI VI w w 00 00 00 VI VI J J W W W 00 00 as as 0 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 - LL 0 0 cc cc CC 3- 3- 0 00 (0 a 6_ a a 6_ v) 0.n In 00 00 00 00 00 00 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q V V V V V V V V Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O • 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 CONFERENCE/SCHOOL/TRAINING-ALL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MISCELLANEOUS CONFERENCE/SCHOOL/TRAINING-ALL w w V V Z Z Z Z Ll LT_ O 0 PLANNING BUILDING MAINTSUPPLIES 00 00 VI VI <n 00L/1 • VI V) 00 00 00 w w w w w w 00 00 w w J J J J J J J J J J J J a CL a a CL a CL a a 0 a a a 0 0 a 0 a 0 3 a CL CL a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VI N N VI V) 0 VI w H 00 00 w w w w w w 00 00 w w 7 V V V V V V V V V V V U J J J J J J J J J J J J < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL LL 0_ CL LL LL LL 0 LL 0 CL LL LL 00 N N 00 00 00 0 00 O N 0 N 0 O N N N N N N N N N N N 00 NOONNNNN 00 01 0 00 M O O O O O O O O O O O O M 00 N M M M M M V 0 00 V V N 00 N N Ni N N N N N N N N O O O O ▪ O O O O O O O O O O O O M Lf1 V1 V1 00 Lf1 V) 00 0.f) O N N N N N N N N N N V1 LC) 0 00 M M M M M rn M M M (0 M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS SHOW OFF SHAKO PHOTO FRAMES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS SOS PHOTO PRINTS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 00 00 00 00 00 UUUUU CC • CC • CC CC CC w w w w w • 00 V) V) O 0 0 0 0 0 u u • u u u CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS SURVEY MONKEY SUBSCRIPTION CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS z z 0 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0 00 0 ▪ 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N O V1 0 O • O O lfl 0 M M N 3RD QTR REBATE (1,926.64) CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CPA LICENSE - REINHARDT CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS APA NOBLE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS MULTIFOLD TOWELS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS OLSON NOTARY STAMP CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS PHONE CHARGERS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS KERR SUPPLIES/ CALENDAR CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS SOAP FOR DISPENSERS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS RECORDS AREA SUPPLIES FOR KITC CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS AXON MOUNTS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS AXON MOUNT TRUTNAU CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS SHADOWBOX FOR JK57 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS TRAINING AIRGUNS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS ICR 23-25048 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CODY BINDER FOR FTO CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS c-) N O co 0) w � cc 0d 0 0 u CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS O O O V1 N CO 0 0 0 0 0, 0 M 0 0 0 0 00 v 00 0 N 0 00 O CT, CS, h CO 0 Ni o0 lf) O M O 00 0 O N 61 61 N 00 61 O 0 0 Ln 00 M O O N 00 Ln 0) N O 0 N 00 4- 0 m v aq c0 Council Check Register 0 0 O Total Amount OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 l7 z uJ EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE CONFERENCE/SCHOOL/TRAINING-ALL CONFERENCE/SCHOOL/TRAINING-ALL CONFERENCE/SCHOOL/TRAINING-ALL CONFERENCE/SCHOOL/TRAINING-ALL TRAVEL/SUBSISTENCE TRAVEL/SUBSISTENCE TRAVEL/SUBSISTENCE TRAVEL/SUBSISTENCE 0 Lu BANK FEES- NSF FEE BANK FEES- NSF FEE BANK FEES- NSF FEE W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U LilVI VI VI VI 0 0 VI 00 VI 0 0 0 utVI W W Lu W W w W W W z z z z Z Ja a a a a a a a a 7 7 7 7 J a a a a a a a a a W W W W w W W W W 00 Vl Vl In in Vl V) Vl Vl LL BUILDING MAINTSUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTSUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONFERENCE/SCHOOL/TRAINING-ALL CONFERENCE/SCHOOL/TRAINING-ALL W W W W W V U U U U Z Z Z Z Z H H F H H 0 0 0 0 0 VI VI VI 0 0 CO 00 CO CO 00 DDDDD 0 00 0 00 J J J J J ga Q Q Q CC CC CC HHHHH J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a cC cC DC a a a a cC a cC a c cC a DC a cC a a cC a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL O O O Cr) O O N O N N N N in Vl Vl Vl O O C. O N N N N N N N N N CO M 00 M N O O N N N Vl Vl 00 in Vl 7 M r N N n N r r r W i0 O 0 O O O O O O O O 00 N 0 M N I, r r r N r r N N N N N N M V V V V V V 7 V V l0 00 u.0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M V NY V V V V V LO L O O O O O O LC> QD , O O O O O O VD LID ID LO L O O O ,0 O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N COMCOMM M M M M M M M M CO M M M CO CO M M M M M M M M M M M CO M M M M M M M M M M CO CO M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMUNDSON MONITOR STANDS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CALENDAR CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS NOTEBOOKS FOR POLICE OFFICERS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS INVESTIGATIONS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS ADHESIVE PRODUCTS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS ADHESIVE PRODUCTS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS STAMPS FOR OFFICE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS ARLO FOR PD CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS STOCKMANN DMT RECERT CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS EVERS GUN TRAINING CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS KEGLEY TRAINING CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CRITICAL ISSUES TRAINING CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS ICAC CONFERENCE 45/44 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CH80 FTO TRAINING CO CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CH80 FTO TRAINING CO CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS DEPOSIT FOR HOTEL ROOM CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS TATE IACP DUES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 7r in 00 M N in 0 rn 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 l0 O 0, LO W Ol O O O O lfl 0, M N 0 Ol V O Ni Ni Vl LriO O 00 N O Vl N N LC ) V1 I� N O M M lO 0 Q1 N iO REFUND OF CHARGE -FRAUD (19.99) CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS BENGTSON FRAUD CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS REFUND OF FRAUD CHARGE 10-28 (19.99) CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS STATION 1 SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 00 J 0 0 N K CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS AND 2 BALLAST CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS DOOR SWIPES @ FIRE #2 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 00 M 0 CO N 0 0 l0 LO CO N N 0 Vl 0, CO N 0 0 M 0 0, 0 0, VI O 00 M O h l0 N N O 00 N M O 0, O O 0 CO 00 00 N N 00 M N 0) 00 00 N M N r N V O O t0 O O O 0) M N M 00 M 00 N I� O 00 O N N 00 00 N M 00 4- O v aq Page 197 of 213 Council Check Register 0 z t0 Total Amount TRAVEL/SUBSISTENCE TRAVEL/SUBSISTENCE 0 0 w w w CC CC LL LL LL 0321.6475 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0321.6475 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CREDIT CARD FEES INSPECTION 0331.6650 PAYPALS BLDG CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CONFERENCE/SCHOOL/TRAINING-ALL CONFERENCE/SCHOOL/TRAINING-ALL Z Z Z Z Z 0 0 0 0 0 UUUQU w w w w w 0_ LL LL LL LL Z Z Z Z Z C7 O C7 C7 C7 ZZZZZ 0 0 0 0 0 DDDDD m 0 m 0 0 0333.6213 FOOD FOR ALL CITY MEETING CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0333.6472 SCOTT, JIM, JAY CONTINUING ED CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0333.6472 JAY CONTINUING ED CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS O M M 09 LIGHTENING MATS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0333.6740 LIGHTENING BED COVER CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CONFERENCE/SCHOOL/TRAINING-ALL TRIBAL SERVICES 0352.6472 LANDY - RASMUSSEN CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS Ln 0 0 0 LT) w w w w w J J J J J a a w a a a a w a o DDDDD Ln 0 0 in in PRINTING/PUBLISHING O C7 C7 O O Z ZZZZZ BUILDING MAINTSUPPLIES w w — w Q w Q w Q a a O 0 O m N 0 VI CC K C LL CC CC w w w w w w w w w w w w Z Z Z Z Z Z w w w w w w w w 0 VI SNOW & SAND w TRUCK WASH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES RECREATION RECREATION CONFERENCE/SCHOOL/TRAINING-ALL RECREATION N N N N N LO 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 I. N N N O O O O O M M 0 M 0 N 0 0 N N N N N N M N V N V N N V M N N 'Sr O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N V 0 N N O 04 n 0- 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FILTERS FOR CARRIER UNIT CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS APWA ACCREDITATION SOFTWARE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS REFLECTORS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS APWA ACCREDITATION SOFTWARE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS NEW THERMOSTATS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS APWA ACCREDITATION SOFTWARE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS OFFICE SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS HOLIDAY FEST SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CHAMBER MEETING CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS BUILDING MAINTSUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTSUPPLIES VI VI In 0 0 VI Ln Ln Ln VI VI VI w w w w w w w w w w w w J J J J J J J J J J J J LL a a LL w a a a a a a a LL a a LL w a CL CL a CL a s DDDDDDDDDDDD Ln Ln VI Ln Ln Ln Ln VI w w w w w w w w w w w w H H H H H H H H H H H H Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z w w w w w w w w w w w w UUUUUUUUUUUU F H H H H HH H HH H Z ZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZ >>>w w w w wH DDDDDD w w w w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0673.6202 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0673.6202 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0673.6202 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0673.6230 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6202 0674.6202 Y Y U U 0 0 J J U U CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS N N O O N N O O r 0' O O 0 0 CLOCK AND BATTERIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS U 0 J U CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6202 REAGENTS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6202 REAGENTS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6202 REAGENTS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS POOL SIGNS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS Cr, 0 0 V1 0 0 0 O N 0 O O O Cr, 0 N O O O M O O or.] O W 00 N O N O O N N N O l!1 O O LO O O N O O M O CS, CT, N O N 00 00 00 LO 00 O O O O Cr, r O O T O N In O M O M O O O O M O O Lf1 O N V Ln Vl 00 V O Ln Ln Ln 00 N (0 V 00 00 M I4 N L; I4 N N O O M V7 O N N O I- M O LP O Cr, O M N O M a1 N M CO N Vl V M N N 00 (0 M I- N r N O L!1 N N N N 0674.6202 TAX REFUND (16.81) CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6202 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6202 Ln Ln VI w w z z H H LL LL CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 00 4- 0 ifl aq Page 198 of 213 Council Check Register 0 z t0 O E O VI VI VI VI VI W W W W LU J J J J J w CL CL 0 W w 0 00_ W DDDDD H H H H H Z Z Z ZZ VI Vl VI VI VI Vl VI l7 (7 l7 l7 l7 w w w w LU w w w Z Z Z Z Z J J J J J J J J CIO 0 0 0 0_ CL 0 0 CL 0 0 a J J J J J 0_ W w 0_ 0 w 0 w 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 00 in 00 00 00 0 00 0 0 00 00 00 00 CO CONFERENCE/SCHOOL/TRAINING-ALL CONFERENCE/SCHOOL/TRAINING-ALL Vl Vl VI VI V1 Vl V1 V1 VI Vl VI 0 V1 Vl Vl V1 VI VI Vl V1 VI VI 0 LU w w w LU w w w w w w w LU w w w w w w w LU w w J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J V1 w a w a 0 0 0_ 0_ 0 W w 0 0 w 0 w w 0 00_ 0_ 0_ a w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0_ 0 0 0 w 0 0 00_ 0_ 0_ o o v 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 n CC Ce CC CC CC CC CC CC w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU F F- F- F F- F F- F- E- H F- F F- F H Z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U V V V U V V V U U U U V 0674.6202 REFUND FOR BROKEN BOX (26.82) CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6202 JOB FAIR GAMES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS O N w 0 0 0 BIRTHDAY SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6202 BIRTHDAY SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6202 BIRTHDAY SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6202 BIRTHDAY SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6202 CPR MANIKINS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS N O 0 0 0 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6230 DRY MOP CLEANING CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6230 SHUT OFF VALVE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6230 VACUUM BATTERY CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6230 WATER LEVEL SENSOR CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6230 CLEANER SPRAY BOTTLES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6472 STAFF CPR CERTIFICATES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0674.6472 LG RECERT, X4 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS LICENSE FOR TERRY CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS PARK SERVICES 0675.6202 HUBER ELCTC CORD CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS PARK SERVICES 0675.6202 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS PARK SERVICES N O N 00 0 0 0 PICKLEBALL COURT SIGNS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRAVEL/SUBSISTENCE VI Vl VI VI VI V) VI Vl V] VI VI VI VI VI VI VI V) VI V) Vl Vl V) Vl Vl 1.11 00 00 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 l7 l7 l7 l7 l7 l7 l7 l7 0 C7 l7 l7 l7 l7 l7 l7 l7 l7 l7 l7 U O U l7 l7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 C 00 0 00 CC 00 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 CL CL CL CL w w W w 0 CL w a w w a w o_ W w a w w W w a Z z z z ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q LU w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w U U U U O U U U U U U U U U CC U U U U U CC U U V V U V V U V U V U U U U U U V V V U V V U U LU LU w w w w w w w LU w w w w w w w LU w w w w w w w 0679.6202 CPR CERT- PROGRAM CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0679.6202 SANTAS POOL PARTY SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0679.6202 SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0679.6202 STUFF AND FLUFF SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0679.6202 STUFF AND FLUFF SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0679.6202 SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS O N 0 0 0 SPOOKY FAMLY EVENT CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0679.6202 SPOOKY FAMLY EVENT CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0679.6202 STUFF & FLUFF PROGRAM CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0679.6202 SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0679.6202 SPOOKY FAMLY EVENT CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS O of 0 0 0 WVB SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0679.6202 STUFF & FLUFF PROGRAM CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0679.6202 PROGRAM SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS N fV O O N N 00 ai 00 0 0 0 0 0 PRIZES FOR PROGRAM CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOOD FOR PROGRAMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0679.6202 PROGRAM SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0679.6202 PROGRAM SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS AGE FRIENDLY GRANT SUPPLIES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS M a 00 0- 0 0 AOA SNR LOUNGE COFFEE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0679.6327 AOA DECAF COFFEE SNR LOUNGE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0679.6327 COFFEE SNR LOUNGE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS AOA MYSTER LUNCH CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0, CT, T T l0 0 CT) 00n N T CS,0 0 0 0, N T 0 T ( l0 T CO CT,T 0 T Cs, T 00 0 0 CO CT, CSI N O T M M 0- t0 T N T T M V O O t0 N T O N O N h O M M 0- r T M V1 0- 0 T L 70 N M 00 N O 0- n O O CO O l0 N N N 00 0 CO 0 0 M 00 M T M 0- N 0O 0- N 00 O N 00 M 0 M In N T M M 0679.6475 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0 O 00 4- 0 Lo v aq c0 J J J J J J Q Q Q Q Q Q 1 Z • Z Z Z Z Z Council Check Register 0 z 00 0 C N Total Amount RECREATION PROGRAMS 0679.6480 USA ARCHERY RECERTIFICATION CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FORFEITURE 2120.6202 BAGS FOR EVIDENCE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS EDA MANAGEMENT EDA MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDA MANAGEMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES SEWER MANAGEMENT Z Z Z Z Z Z CC • 0 0 0 g g tttt O 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 ✓ V V V V V w w w w w w V V V V V V w w w w w w Q 00 C 00 CC 00 CC W W W W W W LL Ll LL Ll LL Ll LL Z Z Z Z Z Z O 0 0 0 0 0 0 SEWER MANAGEMENT SEWER MANAGEMENT SEWER MANAGEMENT SEWER MANAGEMENT SEWER MANAGEMENT SEWER MANAGEMENT SEWER MANAGEMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT W W W CV)V)VIV)CCCY J J J J W W W W 0 0 0 0 0 > > > > 0 0 00 00 00 00 0 N 0 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT M M N O 0 N N N N N N O O O N N M N V V V • N '77 N N N io w a w v w m lO LIDa w o a Cr, Cr, Cr, M M r r r r r r r N r r r NNNNNNN N N r N N N N LUNCH WITH CDA CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS NOV ENTRE MEETING CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS APWA ACCREDITATION SOFTWARE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS WASTEWATER CONFERENCE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS WASTEWATER CONFERENCE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS WASTEWATER CONFERENCE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS SEWER CONFERENCE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS SEWER CONFERENCE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS SEWER CONFERENCE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS APWA ACCREDITATION SOFTWARE CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z DDDDDD u_ LL Ll LL Ll LL In U1 V1 In VI _ _ _ _ _ _ V V V V V V H H H H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 z z z z z z CHARGING CABLES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS w 00 Q V 0 0 CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 2023 IT OPERTIONAL EXPENSES O 0 co N USB EXT CABLES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS PHONE EXTENSION CABLES CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS O 0 O 0 N N CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS 0 00 NN0 ▪ 0 0 0 0 0 0 `0 Cr m 00 LI) CO0 0 Cr 0 0 00 rn m O i0 O 0 O 00 7i O O O 00 M 00 N 00 0 00 00 N 00 l0l N C- 00 00 N l0 00LC1 m ▪ N M r l0 M 7r NM `Cr 00 W 0 0 SWMDTF - STATE GRANT O w 0 0 CO 3,288.40 COVERTTRACK GROUP, INC C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND BLDR 001655 2204 ARAGON D R HORTON C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2370 D R HORTON C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2370 BLDR 001632 2220 ARAGON DR D R HORTON C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2370 BLDR 1870 ALOHA AVE D R HORTON C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2370 BLDR 001899 1880 ALOHA AV D R HORTON C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND w W w w w w J J J J J J W W W W W CO CO CO CO CO CO J J J J J < < < < < < 00 00 0] C0 C0 Q Q Q Q Q Q } } } } } LL LL LL LL LL LL Q Q Q Q Q 0_ 0 0 W W O 0 0 0 0 0 w w w w H H H H H H 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z V V V V V O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZZZZ0 0 g g g g g w 0 N 00 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 vi vi 00 vi vi CC 00 00 00 00 00 w w W w w w w w w w w 00 CC CC CC CC ESCROW FUND ESCROW FUND ESCROW FUND ESCROW FUND ESCROW FUND ESCROW FUND O r r N r r N r m m m 00 m m m NNNNININN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 BLDR 001650 1874 ALOHA AVE D R HORTON BLDR 001655 2204 ARAGON D R HORTON BLDR 001620 2251 ARAGON D R HORTON BLDR 001632 2220 ARAGON DR D R HORTON BLDR 1870 ALOHA AVE D R HORTON BLDR 001899 1880 ALOHA AV D R HORTON BLDR 001650 1874 ALOHA AVE D R HORTON ESCROW FUND 8040.2372 BLDR 001655 2204 ARAGON D R HORTON ESCROW FUND BLDR 001620 2251 ARAGON D R HORTON ESCROW FUND 8040.2372 BLDR 001632 2220 ARAGON DR D R HORTON ESCROW FUND 8040.2372 BLDR 1870 ALOHA AVE D R HORTON ESCROW FUND ry r •71- 0 0 O CYJ CO N Q O < O = O O N J N Q co O 00d 00 co 0 O CC 0 J 00 D R HORTON 0 N 00 N N CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O • l0l 0 M N N 00 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Ni O O O Ni i0 O O O O O O O O O O O co 0l r O l0 00 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 Vl l0 00 V1 Vl On 1.11 Ln O O O O O M r r r r r r r r M M M M M 00 4- 0 N 0) Council Check Register 0 Total Amount RESID LANDSCAPE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2372 BLDR 001650 1874 ALOHA AVE 3,000.00 D R HORTON CO 0) 0) LO BUILDING MAINTSUPPLIES COMMUNITY CENTER 0674.6230 992.80 DALCO INC UNIFORMS/CLOTHING INSPECTION 295.00 EDGE TEK HOCKEY LLC 0 0 Lei WELLNESS PROGRAM PERSONNEL -PAYROLL WELLNESS 149.80 ELEY, GIA W W CC CC LL LL 0321.6202 L L w LU J J a 0 a 0 Ln W LU CC CC LL Ll 0321.6202 0321.6202 ABATEMENT SETTLEMENT DATACARD ABATEMENT 4072.6625 2020 SETTLEMENT REVISED- COUNT 11,333.00 ENTRUST DATACARD ABATEMENT SETTLEMENT DATACARD ABATEMENT 2023 2ND HALF TAX ABATEMENT 35,624.00 ENTRUST DATACARD EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 131.60 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS INC EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 0311.6240 46.96 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS INC EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 0421.6240 124.86 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS INC EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE W a. CC EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE Ll Ln 0321.6240 48.80 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS INC (32.00) FACTORY MOTOR PARTS INC 0421.6240 109.45 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS INC N N N EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 0421.6240 7.99 FLEETPRIDE 0) W EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SNOW & SAND 0424.6240 841.87 FORCE AMERICA INC CO CO UNIFORMS/CLOTHING cc 0 d 0621.6212 BOOT ALLOWANCE - JF 225.00 FRIENDSHUH,JESSE 0 0 N N 6931.6760 POOL WORK 483,213.70 GLOBAL SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS I 00 4- 0 00 v PCS aq 0_ Page 201 of 213 Council Check Register 0 z m 0) O Total Amount 0 W J a a ENGINEERING 00 O 476.95 GS DIRECT N rn ATTORNEY RIVER CITY CENTRE 2300.6310 V V cc 232.50 HELLMUTH &JOHNSON N N J J w w u_ u w w 0421.6222 2 CYCLE GAS HENNEN'S AUTO SERVICE CTR HENNEN'S AUTO SERVICE CTR 00 00 00 M M 00 W O BUILDING REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE w w 0 162.12 HUEBSCH CO Cal N O BUILDING REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE z z W LU O HUEBSCH CO BUILDING REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE COMMUNITY CENTER 0674.6315 HUEBSCH CO BUILDING REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE PARK SERVICES 0675.6315 HUEBSCH CO N ▪ 7 O if) O O n co n N OFFICE SUPPLIES INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS, L OFFICE SUPPLIES INSPECTION INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS, L OFFICE SUPPLIES UNALLOCATED 0911.6210 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS, L n N N N N 0 0,CD OFFICE SUPPLIES SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 144.37 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS, L PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDA MANAGEMENT 2191.6327 FOUNDERYMN WEBSITE 9,999.00 INTEGRATED MARKETING & DESIGN 0 0 0 Oi OFFICE SUPPLIES SWMDTF - STATE GRANT 8025.6210 1,705.00 J&N TACTICAL LLC 0 0 ti C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2370 BLDR 001493 1717 CHATEAU AVE 2,500.00 JOHNSON REILAND BUILDERS & REM EROSION CONTROL PAYABLE ESCROW FUND BLDR 001493 1717 CHATEAU AVE 1,500.00 JOHNSON REILAND BUILDERS & REM RESID LANDSCAPE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND BLDR 001493 1717 CHATEAU AVE 00 w dS 0 w O _J 00 0] 0 z a _J W cc z 0 z 0 O O o O O O O O O M UNIFORMS/CLOTHING w w 136.00 KASALLIS, DANN 0 O ABATEMENT SETTLEMENT KEB ABATEMENT LC) N Lri O co 0 2023 2ND HALF TAX ABATEMENT 12,589.50 KEB AMERICA LLC 00 4- 0 0) v aq Page 202 of 213 Council Check Register 0 c Total Amount O N 6909.6760 3,847.50 KELLER FENCE INC 6909.6760 3,686.00 KELLER FENCE INC 0 M DAMAGE DEPOSIT PARK SERVICES oo Ln REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSITS 500.00 KELZER-ANDERSON,PATRICIA 0 0 C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND BLDR 006579 2135 BROOKVIEW 2,327.68 KEYLAND DEVELOPMENT LLC EROSION CONTROL PAYABLE ESCROW FUND BLDR 006579 2135 BROOKVIEW 1,500.00 KEYLAND DEVELOPMENT LLC RESID LANDSCAPE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2372 BLDR 006579 2135 BROOKVIEW 3,000.00 KEYLAND DEVELOPMENT LLC CO CO CO f0 w a V 0 LL 0311.6202 PEPPERBALL SUPPLIES FOR PD 1,719.45 KIESLERS POLICE SUPPLY CO CAN EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE LU LL 0321.6316 930.53 KIRVIDA FIRE, INC M AWARDS & DAMAGES WORKERS COMP SELF INS I.S. 7821.6610 717.61 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE n UNIFORMS/CLOTHING INSPECTION DAVE LEMKW HEARING PROTECTION 217.28 LEMKE, DAVID C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2370 EFFERSON CT C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND EROSION CONTROL PAYABLE ESCROW FUND EROSION CONTROL PAYABLE ESCROW FUND RESID LANDSCAPE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND O N M rn N N m N N N N N N 0 0 71- 0 0 co co CO W EFFERSON CT EFFERSON CT EFFERSON CT EFFERSON CT RESID LANDSCAPE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2372 EFFERSON CT BLDR 002797 1274 BLDR 003796 1286 BLDR 002797 1274 BLDR 003796 1286 BLDR 002797 1274 BLDR 003796 1286 V V V V V V z z z z z z z z z z z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V 0 0 0 DDDDDD E 10 10 10 10 10 Z Z Z Z Z Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y Y Y Y Y Y z z z z z z J J J J J J CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 N 10 Ln O O O O 00 0 V1 Ln 0 0 r — M 00 LU LU LU UJ LU LU LL, LU LU LU CC a a Q Q Q Q Q¢ a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PERSONNEL - PAYROLL LU LU LU LU LU V LJUUU z z z z z C7 Z Z Q LL LL Ll LL LL 0 ENGINEERING INFO TECH I.S. FUND 2023 LOGIS SERVICES INFO TECH I.S. FUND 2023 LOGIS SERVICES 0 0 0 O O O 0 O 0 0 (0 O O N LP Ln L0 Ln Ln N O O V 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 N e-property Web Host Special Assessments Fin C OJ 10 bO Special Assessments Ping 25% Special Assessments Engr Ln Ln Ln In In 10 V1 V1 Ln V1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J J J J J J J J J J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O M O h O .4 O V 7i Ln 0 N O M O N 0 10 10 Csi V 00 4- 0 0 v 00 Council Check Register 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 w w w w LU w w w w w w w LU w J J J J J J J J J J J J J J a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0- 0- a a a a a a a a a a a a a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Lalin V z z z z z z z z z z z z I- z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z zzzzzzzzzzzzzzwww w J IDO D O _J 0 0 0 0 0 _J 0 0 J 0 J J a J J J J J J J J J J J J J a J a a DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 00 0 0 ADMINISTRATION 00 00 w w H H w w w w w J J V o V V V YYYYY J J J J J a 0 0 0 0 00 o a a a 0 a LL Li_ a a a a a LL a a a a a DOWNTOWN N O O O O O O O O O O O O O N 0 COMM M M M M M COMM COM O N N N N N N N N N N N 00 N 00 N O 00 0 L 0 O 0 0 O lc) 00 O N 00 CO N N N N N N M M M M M M a a 0 00 00 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CHRISTMAS FLOAT 29.42 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC FLEX SEAL AND GLOSS PAINT 20.39 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC HARDWARE FOR HANGING ITEMS 36.91 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC CLEAR LACQUER/ BODYCAM BOARD 13.26 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC BOARD FOR BODYCAM WALL/SUPPLIE 43.59 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC WATER LINE FOR NEW SINK 11.04 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC DRAIN FOR NEW SINK 40.06 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC BOARD FOR BODYCAM WALL 19.89 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC 52.11 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC SOUTHBRIDGE BUILDING 13.21 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC HIAWATHA BUILDING 161.48 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC HIAWATHA BUILDING 77.90 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC RIDGE CREEK CORN CRIB 19.94 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC GREEN MEADOWS BLDG 0.65 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC DOWNTOWN CHRISTMAS LIGHTS 19.13 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC COMMUNITY CENTER 0674.6230 74.57 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 7731.6202 CATCH BASIN REPAIR SUPPLIES 42.39 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 7731.6202 CATCH BASIN REPAIR SUPPLIES 25.71 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC O O r ADVERTISING COMMUNITY CENTER 0674.6338 110.00 LYN-MAR PRINTING O O EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE a a SNOW BLOWER REPAIRS 25.00 MID COUNTY FABRICATING INC O O N z 5 a w BUILDING INSPECTION 64,880.69 MIDWAY FORD 0 0 01 00 1,045.00 MILLER BROTHERS EXCAVATING 6909.6760 88,623.41 MILLER BROTHERS EXCAVATING CONFERENCE/SCHOOL/TRAINING-ALL MAYOR & COUNCIL 0 00 LMC ELECTED INSTITUTE 350.00 MINNESOTA MAYORS ASSN 0 O h M UNIFORMS/CLOTHING INSPECTION 194.91 MOE,AMANDA 0) 0) CLEANING SERVICES RIVER CITY CENTRE 2300.6326 RCC CARPET CLEANING 285 -255 539.00 MULTI -SERVICES, INC 0 O M O CO 4- 0 v Page 204 of 213 Council Check Register O `O l3 c Total Amount BUILDING REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE NAC UPGRADE TO AUTOMATION 6,800.00 NAC MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL SE EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 0311.6240 EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 0421.6240 EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 0421.6240 01 00 00 M M Y Y NAPA GENUINE PARTS CO NAPA GENUINE PARTS CO NAPA GENUINE PARTS CO 0 LIl O N O LIl 00 0I1 O Ni = r O M N W cO N N EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE w w Ce LL LL 0321.6240 00 00 M tn NAPA GENUINE PARTS CO 0321.6240 NAPA GENUINE PARTS CO N 0 00 I< U1 O C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2370 BLDC009905 2750 WINNERS CIR 18,567.04 NEXT STEPS LEARNING CENTER 0 CD W UNIFORMS/CLOTH ING UNIFORMS/CLOTH ING SEWER MANAGEMENT UNIFORMS/CLOTH ING SEWER MANAGEMENT N N N N N N LO 0 w CO N N o N N 2 00 NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY SWEATSHIRTS NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY 00 Lu v NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY V) w J a a 0 00 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 7731.6202 GLOVES AND SAFETY GLASSES NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY O CO CO CO LIl N al Ln 0l (Ni O Lr1 O N CO • CO N 00 UNIFORMS/CLOTH ING 00 w J V LL 00 0 Ln K x 00 NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY uJ LL 0321.6202 NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY SEWER MANAGEMENT MARKING PAINT NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY O 0 l0 Tr co Lrl IMPROVEMENTS/INFRASTRUCTURE SAN24-001 W END LIFT STATION LI1 oi N 00 00 00 77,199.52 NORTHERN LINES CONTRACTING INC H H Z Z Lu Lu 2 a a 0 a a w w EQUIPMENT I.S. FUND STREET INTERNAL SERVICE O r co N EQUIPMENT I.S. FUND M N CO CO 00Ul 01 Y Y NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT N 01 01 LD CD 0) N N O r 00 00 r iri o 01 O1 03 ABATEMENT SETTLEMENT CHERNE ABATEMENT 4086.6625 2023 2ND HALF TAX ABATEMENT 16,724.50 OATEY COMPANY 1- r PROFESSIONAL SERVICES w J 0 LL 0311.6327 INTERPRETATION SERVICES FOR PD 785.40 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2370 BLDC 001355 2900 WINNERS CIRCL 132,894.95 OMRY CANTERBURY LLC C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND BLDR 014508 2063 BROOKVIEW ST ONE TEN TEN HOMES LLC C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2370 BLDR 013723 7648 WAVERLY AVE ONE TEN TEN HOMES LLC Page 205 of 213 Council Check Register 0 i) O O Total Amount C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2370 BLDR 013353 7487 WATER ST ONE TEN TEN HOMES LLC EROSION CONTROL PAYABLE ESCROW FUND BLDR 014508 2063 BROOKVIEW ST ONE TEN TEN HOMES LLC EROSION CONTROL PAYABLE ESCROW FUND BLDR 013723 7648 WAVERLY AVE ONE TEN TEN HOMES LLC EROSION CONTROL PAYABLE ESCROW FUND BLDR 013353 7487 WATER ST ONE TEN TEN HOMES LLC RESID LANDSCAPE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2372 BLDR 014508 2063 BROOKVIEW ST ONE TEN TEN HOMES LLC RESID LANDSCAPE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2372 BLDR 013723 7648 WAVERLY AVE ONE TEN TEN HOMES LLC RESID LANDSCAPE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2372 BLDR 013353 7487 WATER ST ONE TEN TEN HOMES LLC 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln Ln LC) Ln O o O fV N M M C/1 w J 0 d 0311.6202 SQUAD PAPER - POLICE 1,199.60 PAPER ROLL PRODUCTS DAMAGE DEPOSIT PARK SERVICES O 00 V1 O REFUND DEPOSIT 300.00 PEARSON, RHONDA O O M OFFICE SUPPLIES w J 0 d 0311.6210 PAPER FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT 1,027.50 PERFORMANCE OFFICE PAPERS 0 N O UNIFORMS/CLOTH ING INSPECTION 0331.6212 129.95 PETERSON, SCOTT EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE INSPECTION 0331.6240 1,023.76 POMPS TIRE O N O EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE MAINT - FUEL SYSTEM 0456.6316 601.50 PUMP & METER SERVICES, INC 0 O O O C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2370 BLDC 003122 5300 12 AV E 81,818.37 QUALITY FORKLIFT SALES AND SER C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 27,630.00 RJ RYAN CONSTRUCTION AWARDS & DAMAGES SELF INSURANCE I.S.FUND O 0 O N W N BODY REPAIR TO SK1358 2,567.74 REFERRAL COLLISION AWARDS & DAMAGES SELF INSURANCE I.S.FUND O oo O O N r 21,624.09 REFERRAL COLLISION O7 N O N DAMAGE DEPOSIT PARK SERVICES O Lri 0 O REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 300.00 REIN, PATRICK 0 O 0 Co) 6931.6760 SANDVENTURE CM INSURANCE ETC 266,881.04 RJM CONSTRUCTION 00 4- 0 m v 00 Page 206 of 213 Council Check Register 0 z m c Total Amount uJ w a a z z cc Lu 0673.6202 SOFTENER SALT 528.66 ROBERT B HILL CO ABATEMENT SETTLEMENT EMERSON ABATEMENT 4077.6625 2022-1ST CITY SETTLEMENT 41,191.00 ROSEMOUNT-EMERSON ABATEMENT SETTLEMENT EMERSON ABATEMENT 4077.6625 2022-1ST COUNTY SETTLEMENT 32,201.00 ROSEMOUNT-EMERSON ABATEMENT SETTLEMENT EMERSON ABATEMENT 4077.6625 2022-2ND CITY SETTLEMENT 41,190.00 ROSEMOUNT-EMERSON ABATEMENT SETTLEMENT EMERSON ABATEMENT 2022-2ND COUNTY SETTLEMENT 32,200.00 ROSEMOUNT-EMERSON ABATEMENT SETTLEMENT EMERSON ABATEMENT 4077.6625 2023-1ST CITY SETTLEMENT 39,378.00 ROSEMOUNT-EMERSON ABATEMENT SETTLEMENT EMERSON ABATEMENT 4077.6625 2023-1ST COUNTY SETTLEMENT 32,201.00 ROSEMOUNT-EMERSON ABATEMENT SETTLEMENT EMERSON ABATEMENT N 0 2023-2ND CITY SETTLEMENT 39,379.00 ROSEMOUNT-EMERSON ABATEMENT SETTLEMENT EMERSON ABATEMENT 4077.6625 2023-2ND COUNTY SETTLEMENT 32,200.00 ROSEMOUNT-EMERSON a O) W 6931.6760 0 uJ w 32,910.61 S M HENTGES & SONS INC 0 01 M FINES & FORFEITS DWI FORFEITURE 23023405- TOLLER 150.00 SCOTT CO ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 0 z o_ 5 w ELECTIONS 0132.6740 34,232.50 SCOTT CO TREASURER ATTORNEY v J 0 d 0311.6310 CITY COURT COSTS 76,885.43 SCOTT CO TREASURER TIF DIST #17 AMAZON 4080.6624 2023 2ND HALF TIF PAYMENT 142,087.21 SCOTT CO TREASURER N co O a w w w w w w w LJUVIJULJLJ z • z z z z z z F- F- LULU LU F- F- z z z z z z z cc • cc cc cc cc cc cc d • d d d d d d LU cc cc UJ UJ UJ cc z z z z z z z w w w w w w w 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 a a a a a a d DDDDDDD a a a a a a a w w w w w w w ADMINISTRATION O `71- LLD N 2024 TAX EXEMPT TABS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 0126.6240 2024 TAX EXEMPT TABS INSPECTION w w RECREATION 0 0 0 0 0 N▪ N▪ N▪ N W m V I� m rn v a 0 0 0 0 0 2024 TAX EXEMPT TABS 2024 TAX EXEMPT TABS 2024 TAX EXEMPT TABS 2024 TAX EXEMPT TABS 2024 TAX EXEMPT TABS • 4t it it it 20.25 SCOTT CO TREASURER DEPUTY REG 20.25 SCOTT CO TREASURER DEPUTY REG 40.50 SCOTT CO TREASURER DEPUTY REG 20.25 SCOTT CO TREASURER DEPUTY REG 121.50 SCOTT CO TREASURER DEPUTY REG 40.50 SCOTT CO TREASURER DEPUTY REG 60.75 SCOTT CO TREASURER DEPUTY REG 0 0 EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING 0411.6240 #2 2024 TAX EXEMPT TABS 162.00 SCOTT CO TREASURER DEPUTY REGI EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE RECREATION 0671.6240 #2 2024 TAX EXEMPT TABS 121.50 SCOTT CO TREASURER DEPUTY REGI 0 CO N 00 w V z z 1 z v • 00 2 CO • CL a LU 1- z w 5 w 0621.6240 #3 2024 TAX EXEMPT TABS 425.25 SCOTT CO TREASURER DEPUTY REGI Page 207 of 213 Council Check Register 0 c 0 O E O EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE w cc 0421.6240 #4 2024 TAX EXEMPT TABS 405.00 SCOTT CO TREASURER DEPUTY REGI 0 0 N 0 EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE F w 1- F 0421.6240 #5 2024 TAX EXEMPT TABS 162.00 SCOTT CO TREASURER DEPUTY REGI EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SEWER MANAGEMENT #5 2024 TAX EXEMPT TABS 162.00 SCOTT CO TREASURER DEPUTY REGI EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 7731.6240 #5 2024 TAX EXEMPT TABS 101.25 SCOTT CO TREASURER DEPUTY REGI N N N EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION #6 2024 TAX EXAM PT TABS 20.25 SCOTT CO TREASURER DEPUTY REGI EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE w cc 0421.6240 #6 2024 TAX EXAM PT TABS 40.50 SCOTT CO TREASURER DEPUTY REGI O co EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE W J 0 0 0311.6240 TABS; SK1028-TABS VIN: 2407 16.25 SCOTT CO TREASURER DEPUTY REGI PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 7731.6327 1,500.00 SCOTT SOIL & WATER CONSERVATIO 0 0 TIF DIST #21 SHAKOPEE CROSSING 4084.6624 2023 2ND HALF TIF PAYMENT 10,908.87 SHAKOPEE CROSSINGS LIMITED PAR IMPROVEMENTS/INFRASTRUCTURE CIF22-002 TH 169 PED. BRIDGE 6,498.42 SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS/INFRASTRUCTURE SAN19-001 L-16 DEMO 2,695.28 SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES 0 n M O of C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND BLDC 012356 8021 OLD CARR CT N 14,500.00 SHAW LUNDQUISTASSOC INC 0 0 O O PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PERSONNEL -PAYROLL m Ori 5.91 SHRED RIGHT- A ROHN INDUSTRI PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECORDS IMAGING 0134.6327 5.91 SHRED RIGHT- A ROHN INDUSTRI PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LL U z z LT_ 0151.6327 5.91 SHRED RIGHT- A ROHN INDUSTRI 0621.6202 AGE -FRIENDLY MN GRANT 66.00 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 0 UNIFORMS/CLOTHING W W V _V J J 0 0 d 0 0311.6202 AMMO FOR POLICE 936.00 STREICHER'S 0311.6212 KRICHBAUM VEST 1,563.00 STREICHER'S OFFICE SUPPLIES SWMDTF - STATE GRANT Lri O 00 2,496.90 STREICHER'S OFFICE SUPPLIES SWMDTF - STATE GRANT 8025.6210 182.98 STREICHER'S CO 4- 0 v a0 Page 208 of 213 Council Check Register 0 z m 0) O Total Amount 0 w 0 W J 0 0_ 0311.6202 SUPPLIES FORAED 542.88 STRYKER CO CO C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2370 BLDR 000443 582 PENINSULA PT 2,500.00 SUSTAINABLE 9 LLC EROSION CONTROL PAYABLE ESCROW FUND m O 0 oo BLDR 000443 582 PENINSULA PT 1,500.00 SUSTAINABLE 9 LLC RESID LANDSCAPE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2372 BLDR 000443 582 PENINSULA PT 3,000.00 SUSTAINABLE 9 LLC O 0 0 EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 00 0421.6240 102.47 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RIVER CITY CENTRE 2300.6327 DE-ICE RCC SIDEWALKS 767.00 THE GROUNDS CREW LLC EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SWEEPING 7733.6240 TITAN MACHINERY EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SWEEPING 7733.6240 TITAN MACHINERY 0 00 O1 O t 01 h 7 0 BUILDING REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE ICE ARENA 0673.6315 HEATER REPAIR TRUE MECHANICAL LLC BUILDING REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE COMMUNITY CENTER O 0 0 THERMOSTAT REPAIR TRUE MECHANICAL LLC N O O 00 0 01 O BUILDING INSPECTION 1,600.00 TYLERTECHNOLOGIES O m EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 221.16 UNITED LABORATORIES O N UNIFORMS/CLOTHING LU LL m 0 680.00 VALLEY SPORTS TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 0 TELEPHONE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 0126.6334 TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE DATALINES/INTERNET DATALINES/INTERN ET V1 W_ • U V V • V V V V V < • 0 0 ▪ 0 ▪ 0 0 ▪ 0 0 0 LL LL 0_ LL LL 0_ 0_ LL 0_ 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 01 01 m m m m 00 m m Cr) m M m M m M m M Cr) m a m m m m m (0 m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w _ F J u Crime Prevention 0 O O N 0 tie 71- N a 0 v u u > o 0 U C d 0_ Victim & Crime Coord 4G Sim Card 0 V 0 VI V7 V1 VI 00 V1 V) 00 1/1 00 10 00 V1 10 V1 V) V1 VI 10 V1 V1 10 J J J J J J J J J J J 00 00 00 00 00 W 00 00 00 00 00 Ce Ct CC CC CC CC CC CC CC > > > > > > > > > > > z z z z z z z z z z z O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NJ NI NJ NJ NI N NI N N NJ NI 00 00 L 0 0 0 L 0 0 L w w w w w w w w w w w > > > > > > > > > > > 0 M N l0 M M M M l0 M 00 Q N 01 d- N N N 01 cr N O O 0Ni Ni Ni 6 6 co• N 00 • 7r O 00 7 • O toNIN N 00 4- 0 LO v 00 co Page 209 of 213 Council Check Register 0 0 O Lam x w Total Amount DATALINES/INTERNET DATALINES/INTERNET DATALINES/INTERNET TELEPHONE DATALINES/INTERNET DATALINES/INTERNET DATALINES/INTERNET DATALINES/INTERNET TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE DATALINES/INTERNET DATALINES/INTERNET DATALINES/INTERNET DATALINES/INTERNET TELEPHONE TELEPHONE DATALINES/INTERNET DATALINES/INTERNET DATALINES/INTERNET DATALINES/INTERNET TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE DATALINES/INTERNET DATALINES/INTERNET TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE DATALINES/INTERNET 0 0 0 0 L 0 z z z z z z z z z z z z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 uJ uJ uJ uJ uJcC F F w w w w w w w w w V V V V V V V w w w w w w r r r r F I— V V V w w w w w w w Z Z Z Z Z Z w w w w w w 1— F Y Y Y w w w w w w 0 0 0 CC CC CC CC cc in in in `n in in `n Z Z Z Z Z Z I— I— I— I— I— I— J J<<< LL 0_ Q LL LL Ll LL U Z Z Z Z Z Z Z w w w w w LU Vl V7 V1 Ln V1 In LL LL Q 0_ 0_ 0l dl m rn m rn m O1 ro 7 7 0l m D1 dl 7 rn m Q1 cn 7 7t dl m 7 41 m M m m M m M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M MMMMM M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M w D w LID D ID w LSD w m i0 LD a w lO a a w w w V0 D )D D D lO w LID a ID w w N N N N N M M MMMM M N N N N N N "7 V N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M V V V V V V V V V V V V �D iD iD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park Camera 4G Sim Card Data card IP Gtec 0 0 L VI Building Inspector Rental Inspector Camara Data Card b.° N 0 w Engineering Water Resource 4G Sim Card Darin Manning b00 b.0 v N N 4) Q fl C V N N 'd bA b0 i 2 2 C C C N N inw w Q (n in in I IPad 6th Generation 0 0_ Mechanic - Shop Mechanic -Shop 0 N v IPad 6th Generation DATALINES/INTERNET SANDVENTURE POOL 0672.6339 Data Card for !pad TELEPHONE COMMUNITY CENTER 0674.6334 Comm Ctr Facility TELEPHONE COMMUNITY CENTER DATALINES/INTERNET COMMUNITY CENTER DATALINES/INTERNET DWI FORFEITURE DATALINES/INTERNET DWI FORFEITURE TELEPHONE EDA MANAGEMENT TELEPHONE SEWER MANAGEMENT DATALINES/INTERNET SEWER MANAGEMENT DATALINES/INTERNET SEWER MANAGEMENT TELEPHONE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT TELEPHONE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 7 D1 d> 0l 7 7 01 cr,771- M M M M M M M m M M M M M M M M M M M M M )D VD a w D a LID l0 w w N n r r r r 0 0 N N N 0- N r N r Community Ctr Facility Street Display Sign Community Development IPad 6th Generation iPad 9th Generation V (0 !n (0 (0 V) V) VI V) VI N 10 V) V N VI V) VI VI V) N N VI N (0 (0 !n 10 10 VI V) VI V) VI N L V) N VI V (0 (0 VI V) N N VI N N N M M N N N N V N N (0 N N M VI N N N N N N VI N N N M M N N N N N VI M VI N N M M w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J w CC w w w w CC w w CC w w w w CC w w CC w w w w CC w w W w w w w CC w w CC w w w w CC w w CC w w CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC IY CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC Ct CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > z z z z z Z z Z Z z Z z z z z z Z z Z z z Z z z z z z z z Z z Z Z z Z z z z z z z z Z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Lc", D_' O_' 0' CC O_' CC CC uJ C< D_' K d' Lc", 0' OL Cr CL 0_' CL CC Q' CC K Lc", D_' O_' 0' CC O_' CC CC uJ C< �' K K K 0' CL 0' CL w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > l0 10 N 10 l0 (0 l0 M N (0 l.l1 M M M l0 In N M M M M M N M l0 N M l0 O O O O M l0 N O O O O l0 O O O O N N N CY O O l0 N LC/ N O O N N O CO O N cr O O N V In O O O O O 01 M 0- O O O O CO N In O (0 '0 (n O t0 W In O L0 (0 O O N N O N M ( N O N CO V CO O CO M M M 7 OO O N M 7 7 V M CO 00M CO CO l0 N 7 N N N N 00 4- 0 N v 00 co Page 210 of 213 Council Check Register 0 c Total Amount DATALINES/INTERNET SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 7731.6339 iPad 9th Generation VERIZON WIRELESS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SWMDTF - STATE GRANT 8025.6327 VERIZON WIRELESS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES 0661.6327 VINELAND TREE CARE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES 0661.6327 VINELAND TREE CARE O O O ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSULTANTS SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT WSB & ASSOC INC N O M C.O. CHARGE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2370 BLDR 007623 1119 CUBASUE YORWAY CUSTOM HOMES EROSION CONTROL PAYABLE ESCROW FUND BLDR 007623 1119 CUBASUE YORWAY CUSTOM HOMES RESID LANDSCAPE PAYABLE ESCROW FUND 8040.2372 BLDR 007623 1119 CUBASUE YORWAY CUSTOM HOMES EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SWEEPING 7733.6240 SK1393 M6 SWEEPER 468.00 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 0 CO EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SNOW & SAND 0424.6240 PREWET TANK FITTINGS 31.42 ZIEGLER INC 2,601,560.46 GRAND TOTAL 00 4- 0 00 v 00 Page 211 of 213 Funds transferred electronically December 20, 2023 to January 2, 2024 PAYROLL $405,796.96 FIT/FICA $119,141.19 STATE INCOME TAX $25,968.39 PERA $126,342.28 HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN $15,120.30 HEALTH SAVINGS ACCT $11,075.59 NATIONWIDE DEF COMP $7,878.03 MISSION SQUARE $4,923.03 MSRS $6,551.93 JOHN HANCOCK $3,298.75 Tax Levy (MN Revenue) $0.00 Child Support $338.71 ALERUS $2,468.77 Medica $207,256.26 AFLAC $4,720.70 NIS $4,059.09 METLIFE $11,011.95 Total $955,951.93 Page 212 of 213 13.A. Shakopee City Council January 2, 2024 FROM: William H. Reynolds, City Administrator TO: Mayor and Council Members Subject: Closed session to discuss union negotiations. Policy/Action Requested: None. Recommendation: None. Discussion: None. Budget Impact: None. Page 213 of 213