HomeMy WebLinkAbout13.B.1. Long Term Capital Project FinancingTO: Mayor and Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Long Term Capital Financing
DATE: January 27, 2011
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
Introduction
This is a continuation of the discussion on capital financing from the January 18 meeting.
Background
Council directed that staff bring back options for capital project financing while keeping the tax
levy increase down to 1% per year. The immediate question is proceeding with the 2011
projects in a timely fashion.
The subsequent years' projects are heavily impacted by the County's Transportation
Improvement Plan. Staff does not have enough detail on the county's proposed city cost to
determine funding sources. After a future meeting with the County, Council will need to decide
how much funding they are willing and able to contribute to the proposed county projects in
order to plan for 2012 — 2016 in the budget process.
Alternatives 2011 Projects
1. 2011 Recon. See attached project sheet. Funding has been updated and revised to
maximize state turn -back funding and to use all of it for street vs using some for utility
work. The result is reducing the tax levy portion from $785,000 to $130,000.
A. Include $130,000 in a bond issue.
B. Use CIF fund for the $130,000.
C. Use General Fund —fund balance for $130,000.
D. Cancel the project (loss of state turn -back funds).
2. 2011 Overlay. See attached project sheet. Funding has been updated and revised.
A. Do not assess based on 2010 Council decision.
1. Use CIF for the project cost. Tax levy phased in to replenish the CIF.
2. Use General Fund balance over the 40% transferred to the CIF to pay the cost of
the project. Such transfer is consistent Council's use of fund balance for
financing capital items vs. operating costs.
B. Reverse decision and assess 30 %. City would need to do feasibility report and the
time line for the project would be delayed about 2 months and may result in higher
prices due to fuel and contractor scheduling. Engineering staff would recommend
that the project be delayed as the workload for CR 101 reconstruction and the 2011
reconstruction would be too great. It would be better to delay the project a year
than to assess for this year. Delaying the project would also reduce budgeted
General Fund engineering revenue from this project.
1. Internal financing using the CIF fund for the 70% of the project. Tax levy phased
in to replenish the CIF.
2. Bond issue and future tax levy for the 70% of the project. The project would need
to be assessed at least 20% and a MSA 429 bond issue would be needed which
would add about $30,000 to the cost of the project. Tax levy needed to support
the bonds would be higher unless council "buys down" the levy.
Recommendation
1.B. Proceed with 2011 recon project using $130,000 from the CIF in lieu of tax levy.
2.A.2. Proceed with 2011 Overlay project without assessing and using a 2010 transfer from
the General Fund to the CIF.
Actual motion to approve transfer from the General Fund to the Capital Improvement
Fund consistent with past practice would be brought to Council in subsequent months
pending more work on finalizing 2010 financials. Further action on 2012 — 2016 projects is
pending the 2/22/11 meeting with the County on its TIP.
Action
Move to proceed with 2011 recon project using $130,000 from the CIF in lieu of tax levy and
proceed with 2011 Overlay project without assessing and using a 2010 transfer from the
General Fund to the CIF
Gregg Voxland
Finance Director
H:budget /2011 /cip /LT finance II
City of Shakopee Capital Improvement Program 2011 -2015
Project Manager:
Bruce Loney
A. Expenditure Items:
Land & ROW
Construction
Improvements
Engineering /Admin.
Total
B. Funding Source:
General Fund
Capital Improvement Fund
Park Reserve Fund
Grants (specify)
Donations (specify)
State Aid (turn back funds)
Assessments
Sanitary Sewer Fund -Base
Sanitary Sewer Fund -Trunk
Storm Drainage Fund -Base
Storm Drainage Fund -Trunk
Tax Levy
Total
Project Type:
Street Construction
2011
4,288,460
650,000
4,938,460
129,840
713,900
2,200,300
626,890
477,400
790,130
4,938,460
2012
(SPUC)
PROJECT LOCATION
Project Title:
2011 Reconstruction Project
2013
2014
Total Project Cost:
$4,938,460
2015
Description:
Street, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and watermain reconstruction. Including old
TH 300.
Justification:
To continue with the rehabilitation of the City's infrastructure.
Other Comments:
Streets should be reconstructed with old T.H. 300. Turnback funds for T.H. 300
are available in 2011.
Operating Costs:
City of Shakopee Capital Improvement Program 2011 -2015
Project Manager:
Bruce Loney
A. Expenditure Items:
Land & ROW
Construction
Improvements
Engineering /Admin.
Total
B. Funding Source:
General Fund
Capital Improvement Fund
Park Reserve Fund
Grants (specify)
Donations (specify)
State Aid
Assessments
Sanitary Sewer Fund -Base
Sanitary Sewer Fund -Trunk
Storm Drainage Fund -Base
Storm Drainage Fund -Trunk
Tax Levy
Total
Project Type:
Street Construction
2011
430,000
80,000
510,000
510,000
510,000
2012
PROJECT LOCATION
Project Title:
2011 Bituminous Overlay
2013
2014
Total Project Cost:
$510,000
2015
Description:
Bituminous overlay of 2nd Avenue and 3rd Avenue, from Atwood Street to
Spencer Street; 1st Avenue, from Holmes Street to Sommerville Street; Atwood
Street, Fuller Street, Lewis Street and Sommerville Street, from 1st Avenue to
4th Avenue; and Holmes Street, from 1st Avenue to 3rd Avenue.
Justification:
Continuation of the City's Pavement Preservation Program to maintain existing
infrastructure.
Other Comments:
Bituminous overlays are much more cost effective than reconstructing
pavements. Streets will be evaluated each year and may be moved up or moved
back in the CIP.
Operating Costs:
City of Shakopee Capital Improvement Program 2011 -2015
Project Manager:
Bruce Loney
A. Expenditure Items:
Land & ROW
Construction
Improvements
Engineering /Admin.
Total
B. Funding Source:
General Fund
Capital Improvement Fund
Park Reserve Fund
Grants (specify)
Donations (specify)
State Aid
Assessments
Sanitary Sewer Fund -Base
Sanitary Sewer Fund -Trunk
Storm Drainage Fund -Base
Storm Drainage Fund -Trunk
Tax Levy
Total
Project Type:
Street Construction
2011
480,000
70,000
550,000
550,000
550,000
2012
PROJECT LOCATION
Project Title:
2011 Bituminous Overlay
2013
2014
Total Project Cost:
$550,000
2015
Description:
Bituminous Overlay of Ruby Lane, Ruby Circle, Granite Drive, Granite Court and
Sapphire Lane, from Vierling Drive to Murphy Avenue; Heritage Drive, from
Vierling Drive to Onyx Drive, Ramsey St., Dallas Dr., Swift Cir.; and Vierling
Drive, from Limestone Drive to Ramsey Street.
Justification:
Continuation of the City's Pavement Preservation Program to maintain existing
infrastructure.
Other Comments:
Streets will be evaluated each year and may be moved up or moved back in the
CIP.
Operating Costs: