The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About13.A.1. Review of Draft Scott County 2007-2016 Transportation Improvement Program J 3. f}, L CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor & City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Review of Draft Scott County 2007-2016 Transportation Improvement Program DATE: November 8, 2006 INTRODUCTION: Attached to this memo is a Draft Scott County 2007-2016 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for the City to review and comment on before consideration by the County Board. BACKGROUND: Scott County Highway Department prepares a TIP every year similar to the City's Capital Improvement Program. Earlier in the. process, Scott County asked for Community requests for consideration into the 2007-2016 draft. "- Attached to the Draft 2007-2016 TIP is a list of Community requests and County response to those requests. The purpose of this item is to review the County's Draft 2007-2016 TIP and provide comments to the County. ill review of the County's TIP, staff would have the following comments: 1. CSAH 101, from T.H. 169 (west) to T.H. 169 (east), is programmed for improvements from 2007 to 2013 with the County using available State tumback funds. For 2007, pedestrian crossing improvements by First Avenue and replacement of the bridge over the Mill Pond are included. The segment of C.R. 101, from Spencer Street to CSAH 17, is shown in 2013 with the County wanting the City to provide input on the future "vision" of the roadway. 2~ CSAH 21 is programmed for improvements from CSAH 16 to CSAH 18.in 2008 and from CSAH 42 to CSAH 16 in 2010, pending a Decision of Adequacy on the Final EIS of CSAH 21. 3. CSAH 17 improvements for St. Francis Avenue to CSAH 42 has been moved back to 2013. Also a major study on the CSAH 17 corridor, from CSAH 101 to , T.H. 19, is proposed to be done in 2007 to determine the necessary improvements and future classification of CSAH 17. 4. CSAH 15, from T.H. 169 to 17th Avenue improvements is shown in 2014. However, this improvement could be moved up if an assessment project is done by the City and for commercial developments adjacent to this segment. 5. CSAH 16, from CSAH 83 to CSAH 21 improvements, did not make the 2007- 2016 TIP based on current values. The County states they would monitor this segment and potential funding may be available in 2015/2016. 6. Traffic signals are included in a lump sum amount in the TIP to accommodate signal locations that meet warrants. Example would be C.R. 79 & 17th Avenue signal in 2007, prior to the opening of a new high school. Staff will review the Draft 2007-2016 TIP with Council and County staff will be available to answer questions. Council can provide staff comments to send to the County Board prior to the County Board's consideration of adopting the 2007-2016 TIP. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Review the Draft 2007-2016 Scott County TIP and provide comments for. staff to submit to the County. 2. Table for additional information. RECOMMENDATION~ The Council should provide comments as to the schedule of improvements for C.R. 101, CSAH 21, CSAH 17 in the.City of Shako pee. These comments need to be submitted by November 10, 2006 prior to the County Board's consideration of adoption of the 2007- 2016 TIP. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve a motion to send comments on the Draft 2007-2016 Scott County Transportation Improvement Program to the County Board. ~~ Public Works Director BUpmp ENGR/EFIPPENNINGTON/COUNCIL.SCOTTCOUNTYTIP * ~4 l~~" " SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION Scott HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. 600 COUNTRY TRAIL EAST. JORDAN, MN 55352-9339 (952) 496-8346 . Fax: (952) 496~8365 . WWW.co.scott.mn.U5 LEZLlE A. VERMILLION PUBLIC WORKS DIREGOR MITCHELL J. RASMUSSEN P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER October 3, 2006 Bruce Loney, Public Works Director City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street S Shakopee,~ 55379 Subject: Draft Scott County 2007-2016 Transportation Improvement Program Dear Mr. Loney: Enclosed is the Draft Scott County 2007-2016 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) which was recently discussed with the County Board in a workshop session. In reviewing this document, you will notice a few changes. These changes include updated cost estimates, adjustment of construction years, and moving from a 7-year program to a lO-year program to accommodate funding constraints. Please review this draft and provide any comments to us by November 3, 2006. The final TIP will be presented to the County Board for consideration and approval at a Board meeting in late November/early December. Also enclosed is a listing of the community requests and staff recommendations that were presented to the Board. If you have any questions please contact me at 952-496-8491 or email at mkeen@co.scott.mn.us. Sincerely, ~ ~ Scott County Public Works Tech An Equal Opportunity/Safety Aware Employer () Printed on recycled paper containing 30% post consumer content 1311 - ,.-.- '[ r-~- !I ; 'I .."" .I~'.-:J ~.~J I J I~-P~ ~_. ~;:; c;' ~ -:' '; ';' ':" ::: ': = n -""...1 ".'" ..I I /,. . 0. 0. ,,., ,.., ,.., ,.., c ,.., . 0 ,. ~"", i :nrj r; '"": r: v: :r. :;:::; :r. :r. :;:::: ;;:: :;:::::I: ::J 11!;". J ,~, ..-.,.- ,/ '" '" '" 2: 2: oJ 2: 2:. oJ" ~O' -' ~\) "iff; 1~c='1I '.\\]\~ / I t;~ :;!==,~=:::::~"",::l ......: t~=;<; .~ ~ ~ __ ~ v. 0'''''' X ::;-. '3 >- ;c ~:= \...J: ' mw ~ \ - (r .. f J ~ ~ i ~ l ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~- 0' 1;-;:1 " r - ___________u___ -- - ;:.. -iC >- _ ,'"; 'I~ :r. n > ~ "'" Q "< ~ liBH ~ ~ ". t ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ! ~ ~ ~ "',>. ~r::I ~)r.--n 'r. c ~ ,. _ Co -; Co < =- ,.0 , ", -:~ I~" - g) ,,~_ ~ ~ i l t ~ ~;. ~ i ~ ~~ '- I-,~....~~.- . ~ cor. "2- _ I 'Dli7 l :: ~ ~ -a. B. 0 \:Y , ~-.~ .., _. ....- :.. N!;' N rv- ,J 1" ~,-,fr 0 r: ~ . --.-.. "r. 0 ;:;; 0 -- ~ .... \\.._ ~. ~ --.J ::l :::: I-- w 0> I -~_._~- J --..--- ~ l ~ ~ ~ ------~- .-! ~ 5 - ~3 ~ '....., / =- C\ Q) -< ~ w } - 00' "..~'i.L_.~-~- _~..~ - ,) ~'.. "\~ r I!.. /', ~'" =~ I I . I~- ~ -"L - -~ ! I r I:' J I ) .. ~ i'- ~ .__. -r- - 'T ........ I r ... I ) I ~ ..r f...- I /Fi '" ~ , I ~ I -l I i ~ ~ < '\:- r \,~ - : . , , (Jl :~ \ ,/J.... -- 1 ,~ / '+/_~~:?), ~ ~ k;\h- p, '~-=--~.::...-..--- i-I~. !. . ~~ '" H >~- L' \ ~ ~ I I":'.. ~ N. J _ ' eel . I L ...._1._. ) II ~ -!. ~ ~ ~ "f]"- / " ~ ~ l~ I~\'-~> I I J \. I ~ I - ~/ I ..:d I b / __ ~k,,;1 ~~-r- /", ".~~~h-~. ~"~\VI - ~ r~.'-" ~ -=~ T i- '~" - J' [;\ "' ~>- ~ == w ~ 1 i' ~ I _ I _ _~ ~~~~c;. \) . - ~~i.'~ ~ ~~~ r-~ \ ~I ~:~ ,;~~' . ~ ~>-l..:0-. ~'" l <(/;="" ., Y ';i'i\.'::... I~ '. ~"; -r~~:;:~ ~ ~0 ij ~~\~~<T ~fj;G!~ ' w I - .,7. .' ~ I '::..:'S..7~\ J ll. - .". - . ...,; - - ~ ;1 'v ~ <... <0 i ( -.::;- I~ r A ~"'>. ,,__;;:'. I .,.~ ~c:J,.3 Cl) -'- I YJ I'E< I - \ I .l~ -L '0 ~ i-" ..... ~-- t 0; ..d. ~ ~ \.~ ~ _, jjf;?~ >I,,or~o o ...J,....J ~~ ~ l ,l'i - ~ ;;3':"; 'J ~ b --~ _~ <9/T 'V t~l _ ~ L~}(, I~~J &. -- N, ? ' .., J /"_ --. -I" -y,~ I. .....~ i" l\~) , J O~'- / II '- --- ~D I 1 "-..{g: I 1\ ;' ~ -1::r ::T\'- '" - > , '. '-- --=-.J '-~ - 1.. 8 1 N .t.t) '" i...., ~ .- "-- ff I" i .+ rIJ" ~,~~~~.., ',-' ",:.... 't.i\ ~~ ~I---, r-~~f' fl1 l'" .' .' ~,~ ,7,:B, ! - ,I "'- '. ~ r r'_", \ 's':. I ,'('; ~@) 'V /. '7 / OJ. - Z': I--' I :1 '" 1- F!':: ~J ,~.-. -"~~ I _( ( ~ ~ .1 , ~" " .. N .:t ' . 1 "" i() .. ( r v 0; . -/":- L _t~ _ _ -.j." _ ~ _ \ _~ _ _ ... i~ '" ~_.. - - - 1 - 71.. O't zj , ~I"'w ~ ~ 1 ,~ .~ r' j;J-- c.... NC:[~~ ): .. ""\~~I- ~Rr=~IC" '-:>>.'" )~i~\I/ [ po I A,-rv-- ~l<:.tf'i l..... 0- W' _=f-J .~",-l,. ~ v~ Ie ~"';'P ~ L ~ ~ '\ \----T .= f "- r.,,' "~v- ~' f~ 2j:'! ':...(P .,PJ-Ci.--" ~~( I . --- t- ~ I, I I j~ ~ fj w ~. _ ~ ~_L \J' ( y 11 ~ _1_, _ _ _ _ /~ > I ~- '--1- w '-~ I~~~r.~ . -. ri':i)_ -. .' - --;::0-'{ ~\J t-ri '" ! 1 ^, (i." r [<5 \ I c--"-",..j - \.--r L U~i ; 1 1-8 . :; ~N r-- I! , - - r" \ : ~ P1 I ''', \ I -1 ~ JI~, ~7 l~:rn=-I)S'r~>"\ /,-',:J:.//'"_ cJ-~j JJt' \~~ ,. o t::J II;:::: r , ..r I - , ~ ~-~--T...\;- ~ -r:- -1 ~~~~~i t - -I. -- -J f__ \;1 I !.,--'l?i.~ ; I \ _ -_ I -- I~ I ZLrf i I rnj~t-~.'\ I 1 1. I . ~~ . .. . . Community Requests to 2007-2016 Transportation Improvement Program MAP # AGENCY REOUEST COUNTY RESPONSE I Jordan TH 169/282 / CSAH 9 Intersection - The City of Jordan is requesting the county The County is programming $40,000 for preliminary engineering as our cost share for this effort in 2007. to participate in the advanced preliminary engineering and official mapping for the CSAB 9 side of the intersection based UDDn a future l!rade seoarated interchanl!e. 2 Jordan CR 61 /66/ Aberdeen Avenue Trail Project - The City of Jordan is requesting The County is programming $85,000 for our total cost share for this ProFct in 2007. Scott County program their commitment of $85,000 into the TIP program Scott County has submitted an application to the Safe Routes to School Grant Program on behalf of the city. In the application, Scott County commits to putting $85,000 towards ProFct The City has agreed that if additional grant monies are able to be secured in the future, that they would be used to reduce or eliminate the County's $85,000 share. 3 New Market Jonquil Avenue @ Porter Creek Bridge Replacement - New Market Township is Based on the annual bridge inspection, this structure is not currently classified deficient and is therefore not Township requesting Scott County to provide the planning, consulting, engineering, and eligible for state bridge bonds for replacement The County will continue to inspect and monitor this structure replacement of the bridge located on Jonquil A venue at Porter Creek The bridge is and as soon as it meets the deficient structure criteria the County will work with the Townships to replace this located appro x Y:. mile north of CR 86. Jonquil Avenue is the division between structure. Cedar Lake and New Market townships. The bridge needs replacement because the road banks are being eroded and the road is very narrow causing a safety concern In the interim, the County Highway Department will evaluate the identified road bank erosion and recommend At present there are no guard rails at the bridge. The bridge replacement program measures that can be taken to minimize the problem In addition, a review of signage for the narrow roadway may assist with the cost and the remaining portion would be shared between New will also be provided to the townships. Market and Cedar Lake townshios. 10 Shakopee CR 79 and 17'" Avenue Signal (2007) - The City of Shakopee is requesting this The TIP does not specifically schedule intersections that are proposed to be signalized. It is our policy to signal due to the High School opening in the fall of 2007 and the anticipated high include a lump sum in each year of the TIP to accommodate justified traffic signals, spot safety improvements traffic levels. Previous studies done in this area (EA W) with the new high school and contingencies. We will continue to monitor intersections and signalize intersections when a traffic study and Countryside development have indicated that a traffic control signal would be shows a signal is warranted and justified at each location instified upon opening of the new high school. 9 Shakopee CSAH 15 from TH 169 to 17'" Avenue widening (2008) - This ProFct would This ProFct has been programmed for 2014, however, the County will work with the City to determine the have the added benefit of right-of-way being provided by commercial development needed improvements, estimated cost, and develop an MOU with the City to outline cost participation in the and assessments for the additional widening to be paid by the commercial event developer driven improvements are needed before 2014. developments in this area, thus a favorable cost ratio to the County could be obtained Shakopee CSAH 17 from St Francis Ave to Valley View Road widening (2009)- St CSAB 17 will be the subFct of a corridor study in 2007. This section of CSAB 17 is currently in the TIP in Francis Hospital has indicated that ilS expansion plans would need St Francis year 2013. If property owners/developers want to accelerate delivery the County will work with the City to A venue partially closed and an extension of Valley View Road, from Mooers determine the needed improvements, and estimated costs. The County will develop an MOU with the City to Avenue and Sarazin Street to CSAB 17 by the year 2009. This ProFct has added outline cost participation and timing. benefits in that the additional right-of-way could be provided by the two property owners in the area, being Beta-Seed and St Francis Hospital and may even have additional narticioation bv the hosoital for this imorovement oro ect . . . MAP # AGENCY REOUEST COUNTY RESPONSE Shakopee CSAH 21 from CSAH 18 to CSAH 42 extension (2009) - This long anticipated This project is currently in the TIP as two projects with the segment from CSAH 16 to CSAH 18 scheduled for four-lane roadway should be constructed in 2009 as the County has obtained Federal completion in 2009 And the segment from CSAH 42 to CSAH 16 in 2010/11. This schedule is dependent on a funds and has been in the program for several years, The Ci ty would support the Decision of Adequacy on the final EIS, construction of CSAH 21 from CSAH 18 to CSAH 42 to nrovide sYStem continuity. 8 Shakopee CSAH 101 from CSAH 17 to Spencer Street reconstruction (2008-2010) - This The County is fully supportive of this project and has programmed work in 2011 However, given the issues in project would be a favorable cost benefit ratio with the funding from State turnback this segment, particularly related to access and limited right-of-way, the County would like the City to lead a funds. The City would support the rebuilding of this corridor' and also would "Vision" study of this area which would identify the future of this roadway segment The County is willing to support this project by rebuilding its utilities in this area with the reconstruction of provide financial support to this study but feels it should be led by the City, this hil!hwav. 7 Shakopee CR 79@Vierling Drive signal (2009) - The City of Shako pee anticipates that this We will continue to monitor intersections and signalize intersections when a traffic study shows a signal is intersection will grow in traffic with development to the south particularly with the warranted and justified at each location. new hil!h school. 6 Shakopee CSAH 18 from CSAH 16 to Horizon Drive bituminous trail (2010).,. The project The County will participate in 50% of the trail base and bituminous costs with funding from the 2010 would provide a regional trail connection in the eastern part of Shakopee and would contingency. improve safety of pedestrians and bicyclists in this area. The City of Shako pee may be constructing a trunk sanitary sewer extension in this corridor and the regional trail could also serve as a maintenance trail for the sanitarv sewer pipe. Shakopee CSAH 17 from Valley View Road to CSAH 42 widening (201 2) - This project This project is included in the 2013 TIP project for reconstruction of CSAH 17 from CSAH 42 to St Francis has been identified in the TIP and would add caoaci tv bv wideninl! to four lanes, Avenue, . 5 Shakopee CSAH 16 from Dean Lake Trail to CSAH 21 widening (2013) - This project Based on current traffic volumes, this segment does not yet reach the threshold where staff would recommend a would improve safety of CSAH 16 as many of the individual residential road access capacity expansion project The County will continue to monitor this as development occurs particularly with points would be on a frontage road versus a County highway. Widening the the completion of 17th Avenue (future CSAH 16) to CSAH 83 and the future completion of CSAH 21 from roadway would also allow 'for additional capacity to the major regional corridor of CSAH 42 to CSAH 18, both of which will significantly influence traffic patterns in the eastern Shakopee area. CASH 21. Potential fundinl! available in 2015/2016. 4 Shakopee CR 79 from 11 th Avenue to TH 169 reconstruct to 3-lane (2013) - The City of There was no data presented to document that there is currently a congestion or safety problem with this Shakopee would like to the County to consider the future plans of this roadway highway segment Based on current traffic volumes, this segment does not yet reach the threshold where staff segment The additional widening would improve the safety and capacity of the would recommend a capacity expansion project It was the consensus of the TIP Scoring Committee that this roadway. segment of highway should be the sub ect of a plannin~ study, 12 New Prague CR 89 / Redwing Avenue @ tH 19 intersection - The City of New Prague There was no data presented to document that there is currently a congestion or safety problem with this requests safety improvement at this intersection. It currently is off-set from LeSueur intersection. Countv Road 164 and durinl! peak hours causes congestion and confusion. 11 New Prague Alton Avenue / CSAH 15 - the City of New Prague and the County have entered Based on funding availability, the County is programming this project in 2013. into a MOU regarding the construction of future CSAH 15. The project was intended to be primarily development driven but because Alton Avenue is essentially a road block to any future development in the northeast part of the city, the city believes it is necessary to begin programming these funds now. The City has incorporated this project into their 2012 Capital Improvement Program and requests that the County also add it to the TIP for 2012. The MOU states that the Countv be ~iven at least one vear advanced notice of the Drooosed construction. ~ 4 MAP # AGENCY REOUEST COUNTY RESPONSE New Prague TH 19/CSAH 37 signal-Currently programmed for 2006 construction in the TIP. MnDOT District 7 notified both the City and Scott County of their deferral of this pro~ct to 2007 Scott County The pro~ct has been delayed by MnDOT and is now scheduled for construction in is monitoring pro~ct developments, and is planning to include this pro~ct in the 2007 TIP. 2007. The pro~ct should be carried forward to 2007 to reflect MnDOT's current alan 13 Elko CR 33 (France Avenue) - The City of Elko requests the reconstruction of CR 33 County staff is supportive of the turnback of this road and for planning purposes is programming a $65,000 per (France Ave) between CSAH 2 and a point appro x 100 feet south of 265th Street year payment for 10 years starting in 2007. Discussions are ongoing regarding needed improvements and East It is proposed that the City would be the lead agency on the pro ~ct County cost participation A fonnal tumback agreement will be executed once consensus is reached Following completion of the improvements, CR 33 would be removed from the County system (turnback) and become a local street under the jurisdiction of the Citv ofElko. rnk.~:\word\clp\2007-201 G\cotnm_request_staffJesponse_finaLdoc I . , . I . . \ I i I i , I TRANSPORT A TION I I : IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) I i I DRAFT 2007 -2016 I I l "-~ -- -. ....---' TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Scott County Highway Department The Scott County Highway Department is responsible for the planning, design, construction and maintenance of roads, bridges and traffic control devices on the County Highway system. The department works with cities, townships, adjacent counties, Mn/DOT, and Metropolitan Council to develop and maintain the county's highway infrastructure. Scott County Strategic Initiatives Scott County Board of Commissioners adopted five Strategic Initiatives in September 2004. These strategic initiatives are direction provided by the Board to all County Departments in establishing priorities. The Scott County Highway Department helps meet these strategic initiatives by: . Create Safe/ Healthy and Livable Communities ~ developing the Transportation Improvement Program ~ maintaining the highway system ~ managing safety improvements . Develop Strong Public Partnerships and an Active and Informed Population ~ working with other city staff and officials, township officials, and other county staff and officials ~ developing newsletters ~ hosting open houses ~ creating project advisory committees . Manage the Challenges and Opportunities Derived from Growth and Development >- working with developers on preserving right-of-way ~ constructing bypass/turn lanes ~ determining future county roads with corridor studies . Sustain the Countys Excellent Financial Health and Economic Profile ~ delivering projects in the planned year ~ reviewing current program delivery processes ~ evaluating business processes May 2001 Transportation Plan Goals Scott County is committed to providing a safe and efficient transportation system for current and future residents and businesses in a cost-effective manner. The Transportation Plan includes the following goals to carry out this commitment: 1. To PRESERVE the existing transportation infrastructure, in order to protect the significant investment already made, and reduce unnecessary premature costs of replacing of existing facilities. 2. To MANAGE the existing transportation system to maximize safety and efficiency. 3. To IMPROVE and EXPAND the existing transportation system as necessary to meet current and future transportation needs. 4. To explore AL TERNA TIVE MODES OF TRANSPORTA TION based on the needs of those who live, work, and travel in Scott County. 5. To provide TRANSPOR TA TION PLANNING that results in a local transportation system that will safely serve the needs of current and future residents and businesses, support the County's development plans, and compliment the regional transportation system. Programming Strategies Projects included in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) implement needs identified in the Scott County Transportation Plan. The plan also includes policies to guide the development of the Scott County Transportation System. The 2005-2012 TIP is organized by preservation, management, and expansion projects. The following program development criteria are used and are consistent with the Transportation Plan policies. Program Development Criteria . Local agency requests . Structural deficiencies . Safety issues . Geometric deficiencies . Capacity issues . Traffic volumes . System connections / continuity . Balance staff workload / ability to deliver . Funding partners May.2001 Transportation. Plan Goals Scott County is committed to providing a safe and efficient transportation system for current and future residents and businesses in a cost-effective manner. The Transportation Plan includes the following goals to carry out this commitment: 1. To PRESERVE the existing transportation infrastructure, in order to protect the significant investment already made, and reduce unnecessary premature costs of replacing of existing facilities. 2. To MANAGEthe existing transportation system to maximize safety and efficiency. 3. To IMPROVE and EXPAND the existing transportati-onsystem,q'as necessary to meet current and future transportation needs. . 4. To explore AL TERNA TIVE MODES OF TRANSPORTA TION based on the needs of those who live, work, and travel in Scott County. 5. To provide TRANSPOR TATION PLANNING that results in a local transportation system that will.safely serve the needs of current and "", future residents and businesses, support the County's developmenf. plans, and co~mpliment the regional transportation system. ProgramminQ Strategies Projects included in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) implement needs ide.ntified in the Scott County Transportation Plan. The plan also includes policies to guide the development of the Scott County Transportation System. The 2005-2012 TIP is organized by preservation, management, and expansion projects. The following program development criteria are used and are consistent with the Transportation Plan policies. Program Development Criteria . Local agency requests . Structural defiCiencies Safety issues .-.",.," . . Geometric deficiencies . Capacity issues . Traffic volumes . System connections / continuity . ,Balance staff workload / ability to deliver . Funding partners Individual projects are then prioritized using the following criteria: . Maximize safety - correct existing deficiencies in geometry and capacity . Reduce operating/maintenance cost -correct existing deficiencies in structure. . Minimize social and environmental impacts in the most cost-effective manner. . Maximize effective project size. . Utilize all possible funding sources. The following process is used for gathering public input for developing the Annual TIP. . May Circulate latest TIP to local agencies for comments . June Receive comments from local agencies . July Workshop with County Board . Aug. Circulate draft TIP to local agencies for comments . Nov. Summarize comments and prepare final TIP . Dec. TIP presentation and County Board Adoption 2006 Highlighted Projects Preservation Projects Bridge Replacements - The bridges listed, identified as deficient, are programmed for replacement_ These structures are generally a large box culvert that meet the State's definition of a bridge, and are eligible for replacement using State Bridge Bonding funds_ Generally, the projects wait for funding availability unless the bridge is in such critical condition that it poses a danger. Management Pro jects CSAH 42 - Backage roads - This project is a direct result of the CSAH 42 Corridor Study. It will improve operation by reducing congestions and providing safer access. Expansion Pro jects Future CSAH 5/Kittson Blvd - This project is consistent with the MOU executed by the City and the County. The north-end of the project will construct a 4-lane divided roadway and will be a County led project_ The south-end will construct a 2-lane divided roadway and will be a City led project. CSAH 16 (17th Ave) at CSAH 83 - This is a City-led project that is being driven by development. This project completes arterial connection from CSAH 15 to Dakota County. CSAH 82 - This project will upgrade CSAH 82 to a four-lane divided roadway, which will increase the safety and capacity of this road. The City will also be installing utilities with this project. , . 2006 Hiahlighted Pro iects Preservation Pro jects Brid9~.Be.p!~cements - The bridges listed, identified as deficient, are programmed for replacement. These structures are generally a large box culvert that meet the State's definition of a bridge, and are eligible for replacement using State Bridge Bonding funds. Generally, the projects wait for funding availability unless the bridge is in such critical condition that it poses a danger. Management Pro Jects CSAH 42 - Backage roads - This projectisa direct result of the CSAH 42 Corridor Study. It will improve operation by reducing congestions and providing safer access. ~ Expansion Pro jects Future CSAH 5/Kittson Blvd - This project is consistent with the MOU executed by the City and the County. The north-end of the project will construct a 4-lane divided roadway and will bea County led project. The south-end will construct a 2-lane divided roadway and will bea City led project. ...~ ' CSAH 16 (17th Ave) at CSAH 83 - This is a City-led project that is being driven by development. This project completes arterial connection from CSAH 15 to Dakota County. CSAH 82 - This project will upgradeCSAH 82 to a four-lane divided roadway, which will increase the safety and capacity of this road. Th~qtywill also be installing utilities with this project_ , .--. Scott County, Minnesota 1 ;-...._"." . rScott 2007 - 2016 Transportation Improvement Program LEGEND _2007_2010_2013 _ 2008 c:::::::I 2011 2014 _2009_2012 -2015 "---"2016 . 2007 . 2010 . 2008 . 2013 DRAFT , "~I This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended ---y 0 1.25 2.5 5 7,5 10 Map Date: September 13, 2006 to be used as one. This drawing is a compilation of records, informabon, and \ Miles dala located in various city, county, and state offices. and other sources , affecting the cued shown. and is to be used for reference purposes only. Scott Scale: R.F.: County is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. If 1 inch = 17,000 fl. 1 :204,000 dscrepancies are found, please contact the Scott County Surveyors Office. Project Location; S:\gis\localgis\departmenls\transportation\p(Qjects\5 _Year _ CIP.mxd 2007 DRAFT SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Total Federal/State Road Type of Project Local County No. Location Length Construction Cost Funds Funds PRESERVATION - County-Wide Overlay/CIR 1,900,000 1,900,000 6 Blakeley Twp Bridge Replacement - L2987 197,975 156,800 41,175 8 Helen Twp Bridge Replacement - 5716 602,500 450,000 152,500 23 Cedar Lake Twp Bridge Replacement - L2998 224,500 185,000 39,500 56 Cedar Lake Twp Bridge Replacement - 92736 224,500 185,000 39,500 101 Bridge #5944 to CSAH 83 Bridge Replacement - 5944 / Overlay 2,600,000 2,600,000 MANAGEMENT 12 atTH 13 0.3 Re-alignment / Access Management 3,780,300 2,706,400 1,073,900 21 Franklin to Adelmann Intersections 0.75 Intersection improvements 5,111,318 5,210,400 (99,082) 33 CR 33 (France Ave) in Elko Turnback payment 65,000 65,000 37 at TH 19 Traffic Signal and Intersection Improvement 177,000 177,000 - Contingency - Traffic Signals/Spot Safety 346,500 346,500 21-68 Cress View Estates Collector road connection 95,000 95,000 66 CR 66 at CR 61 intersection Install trails 85,000 85,000 101 CSAH 101 at First Ave in Shakopee Pedestrian Improvements 206,500 60,000 146,500 EXPANSION 42 Huntington. Glendale (Segment 8) (6 Lane) 1.00 Corridor Improvements 2,898,925 1,736,770 1,162,155 ~ STUDIES 9 CSAH 9 @ TH 169 / TH 282 intersection Geometric layout for RNV preseNation 40,000 40,000 2&86 Intersections at 1-35 Geometric layout 40,000 40,000 2007 2008 Draft SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Total Federal/ State Road Type of Project Local County No. Location Length Construction Cost Funds Funds PRESERVATION -- County-Wide Overlay/CIR 2,000,000 2,000,000 7 Belle Plaine Twp Bridge Replacement - L2991 190,000 135,000 55,000 7 Belle Plaine Twp Bridge Replacement - L2992 190,000 135,000 55,000 7 Belle Plaine Twp Bridge Replacement - L2993 190,000 135,000 55,000 66 St. Lawrence Twp Bridge Replacement - L3071 245,000 185,000 60,000 MANAGEMENT 2 1000 ft west of Idaho Ave to Church St. 0.81 Reconstruction - 2 & 3 Lane Segments 2,962,000 2,645,000 317,000 86 TH 19 to CSAH 27 3.20 Reconstruction - 2 Lane Rural 5,418,000 4,875,250 542,750 -- Contingency -- Traffic Signals/Spot Safety 505,000 505,000 EXPANSION 21 CSAH 16 to CSAH 18 1.40 New Construction - 4 Lane Divided 12,273,045 11,859,916 413,129 2008 2009 Draft SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Total Federal/State Road Type of Project Local County No. Location Length Construction Cost Funds Funds PRESERVATION .. County-Wide Overlay/CIR 2,000,000 2,000,000 101 CSAH 83 to TH 169 Mill and Overlay - Turnback funds 1,505,000 1,505,000 MANAGEMENT -- Contingency -- Traffic Signals/Spot Safety 700,000 700,000 EXPANSION 2009 2010 Draft SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Total Federal/ State Road Type of Project Local County No_ Location Length Construction Cost Funds Funds PRESERVATION -- County-Wide Overlay/CIR 2,000,000 2,000,000 12 CSAH 17 to Stemmer Ridge 0.50 Reconstruction - 2 Lane Urban 4,315,000 2,815,000 1,500,000 12 SLRP to Walnut St 1.20 Reconstruction - 2 Lane Urban 5,010,000 3,010,000 2,000,000 MANAGEMENT -- Contingency -- Traffic Signals/Spot Safety 625,000 625,000 16 CSAH 16 @ Lynn Ave/Glendale Rd Intersection Reconstruction 1,154,480 793,512 360,968 EXPANSION 21 CSAH 42 to CSAH 16 1.50 New Construction - 4 Lane Divided 9,510,000 4,825,000 4,685,000 27 CSAH 44 to 0.30 Mi North 0.30 Reconstruction - 4 Lane Divided 3,759,900 430,605 3,329,295 44 Prior Lake CL - CSAH 27 1.00 Reconstruction - 4 Lane Divided 3,685,400 840,000 2,845,400 2010 2011 Draft SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Total Federal/State Road Type of Project Local County No. Location Length Construction. Cost Funds Funds PRESERVATION -- County-Wide Overlay/CIR 2,000,000 2,000,000 8 CSAH 23 to CalmorAve. 0.50 Intersection Improvements 2,384,000 2,384,000 69 TH 169 to CSAH 101 3.00 Reconditioning 5,000,000 5,000,000 MANAGEMENT - Contingency .- Traffic Signals/Spot Safety 700,000 700,000 EXPANSION 42 Boone to Louisiana 1.00 Reconstruction - 6 Lane Divided 10,586,800 1,045,170 9,541,630 2011 2012 Draft SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Total Federal/ State Road Type of Project Local County No. Location Length Construction Cost Funds Funds PRESERVATION -- County-Wide Overlay/CIR 2,000,000 2,000,000 MANAGEMENT 15 TH 169 to 6th Ave 1.00 Mill and Overlay 200,000 200,000 56 CSAH 23 to CH 87 1.50 Reconstruction - 2 Lane Rural/Gravel Surface 2,820,000 2,820,000 87 CH 56 to CSAH 8 3.00 Reconstruction - 2 Lane Rural/Gravel Surface 5,575,000 5,575,000 - Contingency -- Traffic Signals/Spot Safety 1,000,000 1,000,000 EXPANSION 2012 2013 Draft SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Total Federal/ State Road Type of Project Local County No. Location Length Construction Cost Funds Funds PRESERVATION -- County-Wide Overlay/CIR 2,500,000 2,500,000 101 CSAH 17 to Spencer 1.00 Reconditioning 1,000,000 1,000,000 MANAGEMENT 15 N from TH 19 through 270th Street 1.25 Realignment on Alton Avenue 1,700,000 1,700,000 68 At CSAH 91 intersection Roundabout 1,150,000 1,150,000 -- Contingency -- Traffic Signals/Spot Safety 1,000,000 1,000,000 EXPANSION 17 81. Francis to C8AH 42 2.00 Reconstruction - 4 Lane Divided 27,902,000 13,897,500 14,004,500 2013 2014 Draft SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Total Federal/ State Road Type of Project Local County No. Location Length Construction Cost Funds Funds PRESERVATION -- County-Wide Overlay/CIR 2,500,000 2,500,000 MANAGEMENT - Contingency -- Traffic Signals/Spot Safety 1,000,000 1,000,000 EXPANSION 15 TH 169 to 17th Avenue 0.25 Reconstruction - 4 lane divided 3,000,000 3,000,000 2014 2015 Draft SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Total Federal/ State Road Type of Project Local County No. Location Length Construction Cost Funds Funds PRESERVATION -- County-Wide Overlay/CIR 3,000,000 3,000,000 MANAGEMENT - Contingency -- Traffic Signals/Spot Safety 1,200,000 1,200,000 EXPANSION NOTE: Projects to be added once recommendations from studies are completed. 2015 , 2016 Draft SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT ~ TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Total Federal! State Road Type of Project Local County No. Location Length Construction Cost Funds Funds PRESERVATION -- County-Wide Overlay!CIR 3,000,000 3,000,000 MANAGEMENT -- Contingency -- Traffic Signals/Spot Safety 1,200,000 1,200,000 EXPANSION NOTE: Projects tobe added once recommendations from studies are completed. 2016