Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJuly 12, 2022Shakopee City Council July 12, 2022 6:00 PM Scott County, 200 Fourth Avenue W. Vision: Shakopee is a place where people want to be! A distinctive river town, with a multitude of business, cultural and recreational opportunities in a safe, welcoming and attractive environment for residents and visitors. Mission: Our mission is to deliver high quality services essential to maintaining a safe and sustainable community. We commit to doing this cost-effectively, with integrity and transparency. Key strategies: 1. Financial stability 2. Enhancing community strengths 3. Effective public services 4. Communication Mayor Bill Mars presiding 1. Ro11 Ca11 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Consent Business - (All items listed in this section are anticipated to be routine. After a discussion by the Mayor there will be an opportunity for members of the Council to remove any items from the consent agenda for individual discussion. Those items removed will be considered following the Public hearing portion of the agenda. Items remaining on the Consent Agenda will not be discussed and will be approved in one motion.) A. Planning and Development *4. A.1. *Set Public Hearing Date for a Vacation of Easements in Hentges Industrial Park 2nd Addition *4. A.2. *Set Public Hearing Date for a Vacation of Easements in Windermere South 5th Addition 5. General Business A. Administration A.1. Review of City County Partnership 6. Adjournment to Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 7 p.m. Page 1 of 15 *4.A.1. Shakopee City Council July 12, 2022 FROM: Mark Noble, Senior Planner TO: Mayor and Council Members Subject: Set Public Hearing Date for a Vacation of Easements in Hentges Industrial Park 2nd Addition Policy/Action Requested: Adopt Resolution R2022-084 setting the public hearing date for vacation of public drainage and utility easements in Hentges Industrial Park 2nd Addition. Recommendation: Approve the action requested. Discussion: Hentges Development, LLC has proposed development of their Hentges Industrial Park 3rd Addition, and with CT Realty proposing a CNG (compressed natural gas) facility on the proposed Lot 2 of that 3rd Addition. Since there was a realignment of the common line between Lots 1 & 2, new easements were required with the old easements required to be vacated. Should this Vacation be approved, the developer of the property will provide new easements in the Hentges Industrial Park 3rd Addition Final Plat consistent with City Engineering and SPU requirements. The attached Resolution R2022-084 sets a public hearing date of Tuesday, July 19, 2022, to consider the vacation of the public drainage and utility easements. On that date, comments from staff members and utilities, as well as a recommendation from the Planning Commission, will be presented to the City Council for consideration. The Planning Commission considered the request at its July 7, 2022 meeting. Budget Impact: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Page 2 of 15 a Resolution R2022-084 a Site Aerial a Vacation Sketch Page 3 of 15 RESOLUTION R2022-084 A RESOLUTION SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF PUBLIC DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS LOCATED WITHIN HENTGES INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, it has been presented to the Shakopee City Council that public drainage and utility easements as dedicated within Hentges Industrial Park 2nd Addition are no longer of public use or interest; and WHEREAS, a public hearing must be held before an action to vacate can be taken and two weeks published and posted notice thereof must be given; and WHEREAS, the proposed vacation is described as: public drainage and utility easements lying over, under and across Hentges Industrial Park 2nd Addition as depicted on the attached Vacation sketch; and WHEREAS, two weeks published notice were given in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS and posted notice were given by posting such notice on the bulletin board in the Shakopee City Hall. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that a hearing be held in the Council Chambers on the 19th day of July, 2022, at 7:00 P.M. or thereafter, on the matter of the vacation of public drainage and utility easements as dedicated within Hentges Industrial Park 2nd Addition. Adopted in Regular Session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the 12th day of July, 2022. ATTEST: Lori Hensen, City Clerk Mayor of the City of Shakopee Page 4 of 15 v1,01 11111111140111 tl uul iu 1111111111111111111111111111111 1101 IINI III � Il lsm Illil dll�l�,��u�;'iI�I,uV�llll 0,9r� % Jl/ Al0 � ming pl!ullu l)) Ilhq i,,)„iiiiiillll1,„1 'Il;,llpl�llllllll II � NII'i�h;R ..'ImllV,lll �II�IIi�IIV h III 'l 'V c.b 0110 j111 """IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII '1'111111IG HIT �lii 411111 I'I'IP';Ilpll I I'!Ili�llilll;;�lillll� „Il�;i�llul' ul li II II'I'il I ,r„1r' allhlpW°'I'igVu� III IIIIII� 1u61lill I ui�lli ll, IPI 1 11H "I� � I 'uaCY'kYV°oI'llllillll 'lulu, IIIV''v µllllllllllllll", 'Vlml" u � I11(11lllm is Liig1 IItl1IJII ,1 MmIIIWIIf"II NI(11°IiiiilW ,I,IIIIIm,,y es Industrial Park Easements Vacati a) 2 SKETCH & DESCRIPTION FOR: HENTGES DEVELOPMENT, LLC EASEMENT VACATION All those drainage and utility easements, originally dedicated on the recorded plats of HENTGES INDUSTRIAL PARK and HENTGES INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION, Scott County, Minnesota, and now to be vacated, which lie within Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot A, said plat of HENTGES INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed this 12th day of April, 2022 For: James R. Hill, Inc. By: Ma `us Hampton, Land - • - , - icense No. 47481 m O -n n -n 1 m James R. Hill, Inc. PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS 2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100, BURNSVILLE, MN 55306 PHONE: 952.890.6044 www.jrhinc.com Page 6 of 15 .C_ <-- -' \<� 0 Scale: 1"=30' -I EASEMENT VACATION Page2of2 SKETCH & DESCRIPTION FOR: HENTGES DEVELOPMENT, LLC 1` ll vim\ \ \c' \\ L P\--.)(N\ r J\ J % J k fir_ 1\1\.7C .i fl L_1 v 1 LOT 1 BLOCK 1 <i L1_ OUTLOT A k'. -r C� 1 n I. iyrD v k 1-1 \� LI) \ o sIZDll l f f�1Tl0k:i�. James R. Hill, Inc. I Page 7 of 15 *4.A.2. Shakopee City Council July 12, 2022 FROM: Mark Noble, Senior Planner TO: Mayor and Council Members Subject: Set Public Hearing Date for a Vacation of Easements in Windermere South 5th Addition Policy/Action Requested: Adopt Resolution R2022-086 setting the public hearing date for vacation of public drainage and utility easements in Windermere South 5th Addition. Recommendation: Approve the action requested. Discussion: D.R. Horton, Inc. - Minnesota is proposing development of their Windermere South 6th Addition. The parcel in question (Outlot A, Windermere South 5th Addition) has a blanket easement over the entire parcel. To develop this parcel, Vacation of that public drainage & utility easement is necessary. Should this Vacation be approved, the developer of the property will provide new easements in the Windermere South 6th Addition Final Plat consistent with City Engineering and SPU requirements. The attached Resolution R2022-086 sets a public hearing date of Tuesday, July 19, 2022, to consider the vacation of the public drainage and utility easements. On that date, comments from staff members and utilities, as well as a recommendation from the Planning Commission, will be presented to the City Council for consideration. The Planning Commission considered the request at its July 7, 2022 meeting. Budget Impact: N/A ATTACHMENTS: ▪ Resolution R2022-086 ▪ Site Aerial Page 8 of 15 a Vacation Sketch Page 9 of 15 RESOLUTION R2022-086 A RESOLUTION SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF PUBLIC DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS LOCATED WITHIN WINDERMERE SOUTH 5TH ADDITION WHEREAS, it has been presented to the Shakopee City Council that public drainage and utility easements as dedicated within Windermere South 5th Addition are no longer of public use or interest; and WHEREAS, a public hearing must be held before an action to vacate can be taken and two weeks published and posted notice thereof must be given; and WHEREAS, the proposed vacation is described as: public drainage and utility easements lying over, under and across Outlot A, Windermere South 5th Addition as depicted on the attached Vacation sketch; and WHEREAS, two weeks published notice was given in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS and posted notice was given by posting such notice on the bulletin board in the Shakopee City Hall. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that a hearing be held in the Council Chambers on the 19th day of July, 2022, at 7:00 P.M. or thereafter, on the matter of the vacation of public drainage and utility easements as dedicated within Windermere South 5th Addition. Adopted in Regular Session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the 12th day of July, 2022. ATTEST: Lori Hensen, City Clerk Mayor of the City of Shakopee Page 10 of 15 1111111111 I IIIIIII 11,,,,111111111I°I 91, Wl liiiiiiii i11 11111111111 I '01'i1,11i" ilV111111l '11111,�111 ��ml�mlw1111 Il 111I III IIII 11)1000001;011111100011111111111111 yy4Y,11rr IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIWW IIy11 IW'A'WIV W W'M'KIY u 11,1 „III 1111Ir111' II1W,uuo1 111 Y1 1;11 OIY11111111111111, m'I^4' ll mPlill'IIIIIIIII'YI rillluul uuuuuuuuulllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll1111111.1 ' 111111111 01/411111000000001 w d,� 11111111 H1101,11111111111110 hlll IIIII IIIII NMINWIWI hll 11IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII WI (6liaimili1116111111fkre1d li�I��,II I �IIIII�jhilllllllu I111111 IjIlI11 IIII III III�u1111 uI I IIIIIiIl�llllllli 11IIh II 11111 111111111111IIIII IIIIIIIu ullld 111I I tl111111111W111u �11 d'I 11111111IIIII III1III1111111 III llll,ll'11,11°I°'I III � � "1.1 II II VVVIVI IIII IIIIIII IIIII 1Ii11 uuuulll1IN" 11 ,ANNmtin 011 oli0111r,1111111 W Iu1l ';lll11'I'Illll� Q' 11 1„ II 1111111 vo"VI'1111'II" 111 �� 1111, uum1111111111I 11111 IIIII I I. 11111 (IIIIIII III iliidiiuuuuuuuul 111 II YIi''III16 uuuuuuul11111P1.1ii111i11111111111111111 IIII 11111111111111,1,1,,,,,1,11 IUGIIVGV +u9W �NI!411� l no' ,INNIIII IryI i,lluu IIIIII,Id1111uII Opel 11118 Windermere South 5th Addition Easements Vacation NoLuaav H19 H1f1OS iaiwa]ONIM © 2022 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 2 V) EASEMENT VACATION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 0 DANTLOWS3-S90'b£S6Z00\A3A?Jf1S\9M4\90'b£S6Z00\ N A.1. Shakopee City Council July 12, 2022 FROM: William H. Reynolds, City Administrator TO: Mayor and City Council Members Subject: Brief Review of the City/County Partnership Policy/Action Requested: None. Recommendation: None. This is an informational memo. Discussion: The City and the County have a broad range of activities and projects that they collaborate on. For decades, they have cooperated on mutually beneficial programs to be more efficient and save money. In addition to the "joint crown jewels" of countywide fiber optic connection, and the Scott Joint Prosecution Association, there are a host of other mutually beneficial collaborations between our organizations that help taxpayers. These include efforts in public works and engineering such as: fleet asset management software; County use of City fuel island, car and truck wash; equipment sharing; road improvements; trail sealcoat; City mowing of County ROW in the City; regional traffic management system; County inspection of City bridges; County data used for City GIS; City removal of graffiti from County bridges; and multiple grants/partnerships from the County including Clean-up Day, chloride reduction, sumps and baffles near River Bluff and BMP study for the West End. In addition, major partnerships/collaborative efforts have occurred in the area of economic development including joint efforts with the CDA and River City Center; Cultural Corridor Planning and Implementation; private development coordination on county highways; coordination with the First Stop Shop with project submissions to the State, City EDA sponsorship of the Fast Track Challenge, and County work on the seminal Housing Study and Commercial/Industrial Study. Page 13 of 15 But it is more than just projects and boots on the ground. The County has always been very helpful in information exchange especially in the areas of taxes and assessments. However, not every project is a success and not every action has its intended consequences. Even with good friendships, excellent partnerships, and great marriages — disagreements occur. Sometimes, this is just because our missions are often different. For example, Scott County is the human service delivery arm of the state. They employee and partner with hundreds of people to help with this effort. Shakopee in contrast, has no human service delivery mission and employs no one in such a capacity. Another example is the County wanting traffic to move swiftly along county roads with minimal disruption/access, and the city wanting more access to local roads. It is natural for disagreements to occur. And when they occur, they rise up to various levels of our governments as solutions are sought. As it stands, we have one real issue before us and a couple that City and County Administration have agreed to discuss. These include the use of the city -owned and county - managed library, the future of LETG (Law Enforcement Technology Group) software, and a discussion of construction on CH 83. LETG and CH 83 will be discussed first with a more in-depth recitation of facts on the library to follow. LETG — Almost from the beginning, LETG has been a major disappointment and unworkable in many instances. It doesn't provide what was promised and soon after it was installed, a competing company bought it out with the intentions to let it die on the vine. It is frustrating for both users and those seeking to access data. Scott County city administrators and managers have been trying for at least 5 years to find a solution to these issues. Our last attempt earlier this year included a request from the managers of Prior Lake, Savage, Jordan and Shakopee to once again sit down and discuss. The response was clear. The County would be willing to discuss, but there was going to be no changes to the plans for the future of LETG. The issue is essentially moot at this point as it is clear that we all need to start to discuss the end of the LETG contract in the next several years and what will take its place when the contract is up. CH 83 — The construction of CH 83 is complex and difficult to manage with the traffic from Canterbury and Mystic, and the intersection of 169. It was bumpy in the beginning, but the City recognizes the complexity of this project and thank the County for the partnership in rebuilding. The escalation of the City's portion from @ 1.4 M initial estimate to $3.5 M has caused some concern in the past. City Library Building — The City -owned building was designed and built to be a library. Page 14 of 15 The original agreement executed in 1977 wasn't fully clear and frankly the parties probably never suspected that the building would be used for anything other than delivering library services. The City essentially views this relationship as a tenant/owner relationship and to clarify that requested the city attorney draft an agreement to reflect it. There are also concerns of having non -profits using the facility to supplement the County human services delivery, as cities are restricted in their ability to provide support to non-profit entities — unlike counties. The city council passed the licensing agreement drafted by the city attorney to reflect their concerns. The County at this point has "declined to participate" in that agreement. The Future — As we continue to jointly work on those few areas of disagreement, we have several things on the horizon that offer an opportunity to partner and achieve even greater success. Some of the most important are in the realm of police services. These include the prospect of imbedding social workers with police to help address the significant mental health and social issues that arise during police calls. In addition, both the County and the City will receive opioid settlement funds in the future and coordinating the use of those funds is critical. Finally, the Regional Training Facility is in the process of looking to the future and both our Fire Chief and Police Chief are on the committee reviewing what it looks like in its next phase. Budget Impact: None. Page 15 of 15