Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/1/1994 MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items DATE: October 28, 1994 1 . Attached is a memorandum from the City Clerk regarding increasing liquor license fees. A hearing has been set for Dec. 6, 1994 . 2 . Attached are the agendas for the November 3, 1994 meetings of the Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment & Appeals . 3 . Attached are the minutes of the October 20, 1994 meetings of the Planning Commission. 4 . Attached is correspondence from the City Attorney to Mr. Spurrier regarding apparent confusion in his letter of October 12, 1994 . 5 . Attached is correspondence from the Mn Pollution Control Agency regarding a permit for construction and operation of a disposal system. 6 . Attached is the September Monthly Progress Report from the Planning Department. 7 . Attached is correspondence from the Mn Dept . of Employee Relations regarding notification of compliance with the Local Government Pay Equity Act . 8 . Attached is a memorandum from the Metropolitan Council regarding 1995 SAC Rates . 9 . Attached is correspondence from the Mn Dept. of Transportation regarding Notice of Release of a portion of H.H. No. 169 . 10 . Attached is a memorandum from the Planning Director regarding Land Acquisition of I .S.D. 720 . 11 . Attached is a memorandum from the Planning Director regarding the Scott County Comp Plan Update. 12 . Attached is the Police Newsletter for Council review. 13 . Attached is a calendar of upcoming meetings . 14 . Attached is the November Business Update from City Hall . 15 . A 16 . Attached is the monthly progress report from the Assistant City Administrator. 17 . Attached is a memorandum from the Assistant City Administrator regarding Mid American Festivals Lease - Former City Hall Building. MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SUBJECT: Increasing Liquor License Fees DATE: October 28, 1994 At the Committee of the Whole meeting on August 30th, City Council discussed increasing the liquor license fees to help pay for an additional police officer budgeted in 1995. State law does require a public hearing and at least 30 days notice to all affected license holders. A public hearing is being scheduled for December 6th. All liquor, beer, wine, and set-up licensees will be notified of the public hearing. Any increases ordered by Council at that time can then be included in the 1995 fee resolution for Council consideration on December 20th. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PROPOSED INCREASE IN LIQUOR LICENSE FEES TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Pursuant to State law, the City Council of the City of Shakopee will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, December 6, 1994, at 7 : 15 P.M. , or thereafter, in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 129 Holmes Street South, Shakopee to consider increasing license fees for intoxicating liquor, wine, 3 . 2 beer, and set-up licenses. All persons desiring to be heard regarding the proposed increase will be heard at this meeting. Dated this 4th day of November, 1994. Judith S. Cox City Clerk TENTATIVE AGENDA • PLANNING COMIVIISSION f ' Regular Session Shakopee, MN November 3 , 1994 Chairperson Terry Joos Presiding 1 . Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 . Approval of Agenda 3 . Approval of the October 20, 1994, Meeting Minutes 4 . Recognition by Planning Commission of Interested Citizens. 5 . Approval of Consent Agenda - (All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. ) 6. 7 : 40 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance map which would rezone nearly the entire City into compliance with the new Zoning Ordinance text adopted by the City Council on June 7, 1994 . Applicant: City of Shakopee 7 . Final Development Plan: Minnesota Valley Health Campus PUD Applicant: St. Francis Regional Medical Center 8 . 7 : 45 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider the Preliminary and Final Development Plans for the Valleyfair PUD, located north of TH 101 and west of Valley Park Drive. Applicant: Cedar Fair Limited Partnership 9 . 7 : 50 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow retail sales on a property in the Light Industrial (I-1) district, located south of 13th Avenue and west of Maras Street. Applicant: MCA Investments 10. 7 : 55 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 624 for Mineral Extraction and Land Rehabilitation upon the property located on the north side od Valley View Road, midway between CR 17 and CR 83 . Applicant: Raymond Ames Action: Resolution No. 624 11. 8 : 00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider a text amendment which would modify the hours of operation for mining as a conditional use in the Heavy Industrial (I-2) district. Applicant: City of Shakopee 12 . DISCUSSION: Shakopee Comprehensive Plan (1994 Update) Residential Phasing and MUSA Expansions. *13 . VACATION - To consider the vacation of a portion of the alley located on Block 31, Original Shakopee Plat located in the block surrounded by 2nd and 3rd Avenues and Fuller and Holmes Streets. Applicant: Stans Foundation *14 . Review: Model Stone CUP 15. Other Business A. B. 16. Adjourn Lindberg S. Ekola Planning Director NOTE TO PLANNING MEMBERS: 1. If you have any questions or need additional information on any of the above items, please call Terrie on the Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting at 445- 3650. 2. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the Planning Department prior to the meeting. TENTATIVE AGENDA BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Regular Session Shakopee, MN November 3, 1994 Chairperson William Mars Presiding 1. Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 . Approval of Agenda 3 . Approval of October 20, 1994, Meeting Minutes 4 . Recognition by Board of Adjustment and Appeals of Interested Citizens. 5. 7 : 30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for a four (4) foot variance from the twenty (20) foot sideyard requirement in order to construct an addition on the property located at 1586 County Road 18 . Applicant: Roger Gross Action: Resolution No. 702 6 . 7 : 35 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for the appeal of a decision by the City Administrator with regards to dance studios not being a permitted use in the Light Industrial (I-1) district. Applicant: Shari Heitz 7 . Other Business a. b. 8 . Adjourn Lindberg S. Ekola Planning Director NOTE TO THE B.O.A.A. MEMBERS: 1. If you have any questions or need additional information on any of the above items, please call Terrie on the Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting. 2. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the Planning Department prior to the meeting. OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE PLANNING COMMISSION Special Session Shakopee, Minnesota October 20, 1994 MEMBERS PRESENT: Joos, Mars, DuBois, Link, &Bladow MEMBERS ABSENT: Madigan& Christensen(arrived late) STAFF PRESENT: Lindberg Ekola, Planning Director Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer Paul Bilotta, Senior Planner Lisa Anderson, Recording Secretary I. ROLL CALL Chrmn. Joos called the meeting to order at 7:31 p.m. The roll call was taken as noted above. H. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. III. APPROVAL OF THE OCTOBER 6, 1994, MEETING MINUTES The minutes of the October 6, 1994, meeting were approved as presented. IV. RECOGNITION OF INTERESTED CITIZENS Chrmn. Joos recognized anyone in the audience wishing to speak on any item not on the agenda. There was no response. V. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Item 9, Review: Land Acquisition - Independent School District 720, was taken off the Consent Agenda. VI. PRESENTATION: SCOTT COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE, MR. JOHN SHARDLOW OF DAHLGREN, SHARDLOW, UBAN, INC. Chrmn. Joos opened the floor for discussion regarding this matter. Mr. John Shardlow, 300 First Avenue North,Minneapolis, MN, approached the podium and provided a summary regarding this matter. (See attached Exhibit A). He stated that the . County has been very supportive on getting a handle on the growth management issues. He Minutes of the Page- 2 Shakopee Planning Commission October 20, 1994 projected that by the end of this year, 1994, the plan should be ready for a public hearing. Comm. Christensen took a chair at 7:53 p.m. Chrmn. Joos asked if there was a moratorium on this project and if so, how long would it be in affect. Mr. Shardlow responded that there is a moratorium in affect and it is up to the County to decide when the plan is to be adopted. The Planning Director asked what type of growth is expected in terms of housing projections. Mr. Shardlow responded that within the next thirty years or so, the state is projecting Scott County to be the fastest growing county in the seven county metropolitan area, with a projected growth of sixty-six percent over the next thirty years. VII. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: TO CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE MINNESOTA VALLEY HEALTH CAMPUS PUD. LOCATED EAST OF COUNTY ROAD 17 (MARSCHALL ROAD) AND SOUTH OF THE FUTURE TH 101 BYPASS. APPLICANT- ST. FRANCIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER(SFRMC) Chrmn. Joos opened the public hearing regarding this matter. The Asst. City Planner provided a brief summary regarding this matter. She stated that at the October 6th meeting, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing regarding this request. Due to the size and complexity of this project, the public hearing was continued to 1 allow time for the applicants and staff to get together to resolve some of the issues. The applicants have since met with staff to discuss these issues, and staff has generated a number of preliminary conditions of approval. These conditions are included in the staff report. She stated that a letter from Mr. Richard Wicka .was placed on the table for all the Commissioners. It states that, after reviewing the recommended conditions, the applicants found themselves in disagreement with many of them. However, after discussions with staff this morning, the applicants feel that they have either resolved their issues, or plan to meet with staff next week to resolve them prior to the Commission's review of the Final Development Plan for the PUD. She stated that staff is recommending approval of the Preliminary Development Plan to the City Council, subject to the conditions discussed in the staff report. Chrmn. Joos stated that a real concern of his is that there should be a traffic signal in place on County Road 17. Minutes of the Page- 3 Shakopee Planning Commission October 20, 1994 Mr.Richard Wicka, 1882 Dayton Avenue, St. Paul, MN, approached the podium. He stated that a lot of the issues, as stated in the letter, have already been resolved or will be during the next meeting with the City staff Mr. Dick Copy, RLK Associates, 922 Main Street, Hopkins, MN, approached the podium. He stated that he has had discussions with the County to have a traffic signal put in place on County Road 17. He stated that the traffic study indicated that, for Phase One and Phase Two of the project, a traffic signal at the intersection is warranted. If development in the area takes off like it is forecasted in the traffic study, then the signal will be warranted. He stated that, even if the development doesn't take off, he feels a need for a traffic signal at the entrance to the hospital and has already prepared a Signal Justification Report and has submitted it to the County for their review. Motion: Comm. Mars/Christensen offered a motion to close the public hearing regarding the Preliminary Development Plan. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Motion: Comm. Mars/DuBois offered a motion to continue the public hearing regarding the Preliminary Plat to December 8, 1994. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Motion: Comm. Mars/Bladow offered a motion to recommend approval of the Preliminary Development Plan to the City Council, subject to the following conditions: 1. The following variances are approved: A. (1) Section 11.28, Subd. 5.A, regarding Front Yard Setback of 50 Feet. The applicant is proposing a 50 foot variance to the.50 foot front yard setback requirement is approved for attaching (zero setback) the St. • Francis Regional Medical Center to the Park Nicollet Medical Center. B. (1) Section 11.28, Subd. 5.A, regarding Rear Yard Setback of 40 Feet. The applicant is proposing a 40 foot variance to the 40 foot rear yard setback requirement is approved for attaching (zero setback) the St. Francis Regional Medical Center to the Park Nicollet Medical Center. (2) The applicant is proposing a 20 foot variance to the 40 foot rear yard setback requirement is approved for the lot for the Long Term Care facility to be located 25 feet from the rear lot line. C. (2) Section 11.28, Subd. 5.A, regarding the Side Yard Setback of 15 Feet. The applicant is proposing two 15 foot variances to the 15 foot side yard setback requirement are approved for attaching (zero setback) the St. • Francis Regional Medical Center to the Park Nicollet Medical Center. Minutes of the Page- 4 Shakopee Planning Commission October 20, 1994 2. The following requirements regarding right-of-way and street construction shall be required: A. A 60 foot wide right-of-way dedication will be required for the north street, 40 feet wide for the east street, and 80 feet wide for the south street. B. The applicants shall submit a petition for public improvements for the north, south and east street projects and waive their rights to appeal any assessments. 3. The following requirements regarding open space and Park Dedication shall be required: A. The 15.6 acres of open space shall not be reduced in area without approval by the City Council. 4. The following requirements regarding landscaping and wetlands shall be required: A. The PUD shall comply with Section 11.60, Performance Standards, Subd. 8, of the Zoning Ordinance adopted by the City Council on June 7, 1994 for Landscaping Requirements, including: 1) Fifteen percent (15%) of the lot must be landscaped. It must be concentrated between the principal structure and any adjacent street right-of-way, or other areas which are visible from the street; 2) A minimum of, five units of landscaping are required for each 1,000 square feet or fraction thereof of gross building area up to 10,000 square feet. An additional three units of landscaping hall be required for each 1,000 square feet or fraction thereof of gross building area over 10,000 square feet and up to 50,000 square , feet. An additional unit of landscaping shall be required for each 1,000 square feet or fraction thereof of gross building area over 50,000 and up to 100,000 square feet. An additional one unit of landscaping shall be required for each 5,000 square feet or fraction thereof of gross building area over 100,000 square feet. Using these requirements, the applicant would be required to plant a minimum of 252 units on the PUD site. 3) Landscaping;materials must meet the following minimum size requirements. Each constitutes one unit of landscaping. Not more than 50 percent of the landscaping units shall be composed of shrubbery. a) Overstory Deciduous Trees 2 inch diameter b) Ornamental Trees 1-1/2 inch diameter c) Coniferous Trees 6 feet d) Shrubbery 5 gallons Minutes of the Page- 5 Shakopee Planning Commission October 20, 1994 4) If healthy landscaping of acceptable species exists on a site prior to development, the Zoning Administrator may allow credit if it is left in good condition. One unit of mature existing landscaping may be credited as two unit of new landscaping. Each existing mature hardwood tree may be credited as three units. 5) All landscaping shall be properly maintained and any dead or diseased material shall be removed and replaced with material meeting these requirements. The City shall require submission of a landscaping bond in an amount equal to 115 percent of the value of the landscaping to ensure compliance with this section during the first year after planting. 5. The following requirements regarding easements shall be required: A. Each property shall have its own water service, and sanitary and storm sewer services. B. All private utility easements that cross private property shall have a recorded easement. This easement document must be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording by the Scott County Recorder. C. The stormwater detention pond shall be covered by a public drainage easement. 6. The following procedural actions must be taken: A. A Development Agreement stating the conditions of approval of the PUD must be filed with the Scott County Recorder. B. Approval of the Preliminary Development Plans is contingent upon receiving a Certificate of Exemption from the Wetlands Act of 1991. C. Approval of the Final Development Plan is contingent upon the approval of the following by the City Engineer: 1. The Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan; 2. The Erosion Control Plan; 3. The Stormwater Management Plan, including the stormwater calculations; and 4. The Final Construction Plans for all public improvements. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. VIII. DISCUSSION: SHAKOPEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (1994 UPDATE),REVIEW OF COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL AREAS. The Senior Planner provided a presentation regarding this matter. The first item for • discussion was the farm located at the intersection of 10th Avenue and Hwy. 169, north of Minutes of the Page- 6 Shakopee Planning Commission October 20, 1994 County Market. He stated that staff is proposing that this parcel be zoned commercial. It is currently located outside of the City limits. Comm. DuBois stated she feels strongly about having it zoned commercial, but Comm. Christensen stated that she feels strongly that it should not be zoned commercial. Chrmn. Joos stated that before a decision is made regarding this parcel of land, he feels the design of the intersection should be changed instead. Comm. Christensen stated that the people living in that area should have an opportunity to voice their opinions at a public hearing before a decision is made. A consensus was made by the Commission that when this property is annexed, the City will take it through the zoning process. The Senior Planner provided a brief summary regarding the proposed plan for the intersection of County Road 17 and the Bypass. He stated that staff is recommending changing this area from a commercial designation to residential. Some discussion was had regarding having a gas and grocery store put in this area and what the projected traffic flow would be. Comm. Joos and Christensen stated that they feel this area should be zoned single family residential. Comm. DuBois agreed, but said that she would prefer mid-density residential. Comm. Mars stated that he disagrees, and would like to have some of the area zoned commercial in order to accommodate residents living within this area, and to cut down on cross traffic traveling through their neighborhoods to get to the downtown. A split decision was made by the Board regarding changing this area from a commercial to a residential designation. Comm. DuBois, Bladow and Link stated that they would like it designated for commercial use, and Comm. Mars, Joos and Christensen stated that they would like it designated for residential use. The Senior Planner provided a brief summary regarding Gorman Street. He stated that staff is proposing that with the upgrade of Gorman Street, this area could become a viable multiple family residential area with good transportation access for the future residents. There would be easy access to many retail services and with a re-orientation to Gorman Street, this area could be more attractive to residential developers and future residents. A consensus was made by the Board to concur with the staffs proposal. The Senior Planner provided a brief summary regarding the Race track area. He stated that Minutes of the Page- 7 Shakopee Planning Commission October 20, 1994 staffs proposal is intended to remove some of the development constraints on the area, while also leaving enough flexibility that the Racetrack area could spin off track-related development. A consensus was made by the Board to concur with the staffs proposal. Ms. Gloria Vierling, 1461 County Road 79, Shakopee, MN, approached the podium. She stated that she was concerned about the parcel of land in the northwest corner of the intersection of County Road 17 and Marschall Road. She stated that when this was put in the Comprehensive Plan originally, it was to be buffered by mid-density residential development, as well as the Upper Valley Drainage-way. She stated that Wal-Mart has agreed to purchase both the areas on the north and on the south of Vierling Drive. They plan to construct their retail operation south of Vierling Drive, but wanted control over what kind of retail operation goes in on the north side of Vierling Drive. She stated that if the Comprehensive Plan is changed, it will impact a lot of people, A consensus was made by the Board to stick to the existing Comprehensive Plan. There was a brief discussion regarding the south side of the bypass. Staff is proposing to change the southwest corner to a residential designation. A consensus was made by the Board to concur with staffs proposal. The Senior Planner provided a brief summary regarding East Dean Lake area. He stated that staff is proposing in the Comprehensive Plan that the "Regional Commercial" land use designation correspond to a totally new Regional Commercial Zoning Ordinance classification that will have to be created at a future date. This will allow additional control to ensure that the City's concerns are addressed. • •Mr. Steve Soltau, representative for Shakopee Crossings, 3601 Minnesota Drive, Suite 880, Bloomington, Minnesota, approached the podium. He expressed concern for taking this property out of the industrial zone. The Senior Planner responded there should be enough commercial areas available in the future. • A consensus was made by the,Commission to concur with staffs proposal. IX. REVIEW: LAND ACQUISITION- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 720. The Planning Director,stated that, at a recent City Council meeting, the Council authorized the acquisition of land located southwest of CR 78 and CR 79. MN Stat. 462.356, Subd. 2, requires that a local planning Commission review all City land acquisitions: He added that Minutes of the Page- 8 Shakopee Planning Commission October 20, 1994 staff is requesting that the Planning Commission review the proposed land acquisition for ISD 720. The City has been asked to purchase the property since it can take action in a more timely fashion. Comm. Joos and Dubois stated that it is difficult to vote on something that is out of the City's jurisdiction, since this land is located in Jackson Township. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Bladow offered a motion to recommend to the City Council the proposed land acquisition for ISD 720 is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Vote: The motion carried four to two with Comm. Christensen, Link,Bladow and Mars voting in favor and Comm.DuBois and Joos voting against the motion. X. OTHER BUSINESS: There was no other business discussed. XI. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10:25 p.m. • EXHIBIT 1 A SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: • Scott County has experienced significant, unsewered, large lot residential development in its townships, well beyond the Metropolitan Urban Service Area boundary. • Substantial vacant land remains within several of the incorporated cities, between the MUSA Line and the developing townships beyond, thus creating a "leap frog" development pattern. • The development that is occurring within the townships is not being organized.in accordance with any adopted long range master plan. • The subdivision of lots within the townships has evidenced an over reliance on the County road system for providing direct access to individual parcels. This pattern, along with the related lack of an internal street system to provide direct land access, will cause inefficiencies in the future use of internal parcels. The .large number of curb cuts on the County roads will add to the cost of future County highway improvement projects. Scott County Comprehensive Plan Update Findings and Recommendations September 22, 1994 2 • Development within the "Urban Expansion Areas" immediately south of Savage and Prior Lake has occurred with no planning for the extension of urban services. Consequently, (according to representatives of both cities) the cost of extending municipal services will exceed the value of some of the properties to be served, thus, presenting a major obstacle to the orderly extension of urban services. • The large number of lots that have been created and the amount of unsewered development that has occurred has caused adverse effects related to land economics within the County. The abundance of large lots has inflated land values and threatens the long term viability of agriculture within the County. • The current populations within Credit River and New Market Townships exceed the population within the Cities of Savage and Prior Lake 15 years ago. Both of these townships desire the-ability to develop entirely with non-agricultural uses. Neither township currently has a comprehensive plan to guide this growth. • While there has been some recent annexation from Jackson Township to theCity of Shakopee, there is no plan for the future urbanization of the remainder of Jackson,and Louisville Townships: Neither township desires further annexation. • Scott County Comprehensive Plan Update Findings and Recommendations September 22. 1994 3 SUMNIARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS: To respond to these findings and to accomplish the" Goals and Objectives adopted by the Scott County Planning Committee, the Consultants and County Staff recommend the following: • The County's Comprehensive Plan should strongly endorse the expansion of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area within the remaining undeveloped portions of the incorporated municipalities. The County should work with the cities and the Metropolitan Council to accomplish this change. • The Plan should strongly encourage those townships that are experiencing intense development pressure to consider incorporation, consolidation with adjacent cities, or meaningful annexation agreements with adjacent cities. . 1r • Outside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area, the County should strive to comply with the Metropolitan Council's 64 per 640 acres density standard. Where existing development patterns and densities preclude compliance, the townships should be allowed to complete the development of the area with densities compatible with the existing development. However, the completion of the necessary steps to complete an effective Scott County Comprehensive Plan Update Findings and Recommendations September 22. 1994 4 official map shall take precedence over achieving consistency with surrounding densities. • • The Plan should strongly encourage and support clustering, with appropriate compliance with, the adopted official map and required urban overlay plats. Minimum lot sizes within clusters should be governed by the requirements for providing for successful on-site sewage disposal and to facilitate the efficient future subdivision to urban densities. e Before additional large lot subdivision is permitted in _th'e urbanizing townships, they should prepare and adopt an official map for future streets, parks and open space and future community facilities. When future subdivisions are approved they should be consistent with the official map, provide access from a township roadway system and include the filing of an urban _overlay plat._. The location of the house should be on one of the future, urban sized lots, and sufficient right of way and all necessary easements should be provided to facilitate the eventual transition of these areas from rural to ;,urban densities. - • Scott County Comprehensive Plan Update Findings and Recommendations September 22. 1994 5 • The County should adopt new ordinances, definitions, and/or stronger standards for the following: On-site sewage disposal systems; need better maintenance & inspection Mining Operations; need an improved ordinance Home Extended Businesses; need better standards • Interim Uses (Including School Bus Services); need a new ordinance Woodland Preservation; need a new ordinance Accessory Structure Sizes; need better standards Design Standards (Parking, Signs); need better standards • Scott County Comnrehentcive Plan Ilndnte Pindinvc and Rornntmonrintinnc .Contomhor 77 100.1 L+ SHAKOPEE October 13 , 1994 Mr. H. R. Spurrier 1717 Presidential Lane Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mr. Spurrier: I have reviewed your letter of October 12, 1994, and apparently there is some confusion. The letter suggests that the City is taking corrective action on the lot in question. The City is not taking any action; rather we have requested the developer to respond to the concerns you have raised, and the differences in elevation we have discovered. You indicate that no trespassing is approved, but argue that the City must resolve this issue. As I understand this issue, the problem is the developer' s for grading improperly, not the City' s . If you have information that indicates otherwise, please let me know. Please contact the developer, as I suggested in my October 10th letter. The contact person is Paul Cherne, Pioneer Engineering, 2422 Enterprise Drive, Mendota Heights, MN 55120 . His phone number is (612) 681-1914 . If you have further concerns, please let me know. Sincere y, Karen Ma ty City Attorney cc : Mayor Laurent Members of the City Council Mr. Kraft Mr. Nummer COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee,Minnesota 55379-1351 612-445-3650 FAX 612-445-6718 it 5- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency October 13, 1994 The Honorable Gary Laurent Mayor, City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 Dear Mayor Laurent: ao Enclosed is a copy of Permit Number 19362 for the construction and operation of a sanitary sewer extension system to be located in Shakopee, Minnesota. Please carefully review the permit including any Special Conditions, General Conditions (No. 1-20) and information relative to plans and the permit application. Please let us know if you have any questions regarding these documents. If you do have questions, you may contact me at the address listed below or call me at (612) 296-7762. If you like, you may also use our toll free number, which is 1-800-657-3864. Sincerely, 06-071j) "1/11-61)- Irsd Donald K. Perwien, P.E. , Staff Engineer Compliance Unit 1 Municipal Section Water Quality Division DKP:j ae Enclosures: Sewer Extension Permit cc: mommilINAPINWOMMOMMOMMIMPINIMMINftstor Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Metropolitan Council-Wastewater Services, c/o Don Bluhm Metropolitan Council-Technical Services, c/o Marcel Jouseau 520 Lafayette Rd.N.; St. Paul, MN 55155-4194; (612)296-6300(voice); (612)282-5332(TTY) Regional Offices: Duluth•Brainerd•Detroit Lakes•Marshall•Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer•Printed on recycled paper containing at least 10%fibers from paper recycled by consumers. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A DISPOSAL SYSTEM CITY OF SHAKOPEE Scott County Pursuant to authorization by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) , and in accordance with the provisions of Minn. Stat. chs. 115 and 116, plans are approved and a permit is hereby granted to the above-referenced Permittee for the construction and operation of a sanitary sewer extension in Shakopee, Minnesota. The facilities will consist of 3,189 linear feet of 8 inch sanitary sewer pipe. The facilities are further described in MPCA approved plans and specifications designated as: "Prairie Bend Utility, Street Construction & Grading Plan" received September 16, 1994, prepared by Pioneer Engineering, P.A. for the city of Shakopee. It is the Permittee's responsibility to assure compliance with any special conditions and the general conditions that are required by this permit. This includes taking all necessary measures needed to comply, including, but not limited to, the notification of contractors or others who may be carrying out this work. PERMIT NUMBER: 19362 V flc Lurie H. Martinson DATED: October 13, 1994 Acting Supervisor, Compliance Unit 1 Municipal Section Water Quality Division 520 Lafayette Rd. N.; St. Paul, MN 55155-4194;(612)296-6300(voice); (612)282-5332(TTY) Regional Offices: Duluth•Brainerd•Detroit Lakes•Marshall•Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer•Printed on recycled paper containing at least 10%fibers from paper recycled by consumers. Monthly Progress Report Planning Department September 30, 1994 PROJECT START COMPLETE STATUS COMMENTS Administration 1. 1995-1999 CIP 3/01/94 9/30/94 100% CC Approval on 10/18/94 2. Planning Secretary Hire 9/25/94 11/15/94 10% In progress 3. Project Managment Database 7/15/94 12/15/94 50% In progress 4. Computer Purchase 3/01/94 9/30/94 100% Installed Long Range Planning 1. Jack. Twp. Comp Pln Amend 3/01/94 10/04/94 95% Met Council approved 2. Jack. Twp. Annex. (north) 3/01/94 11/09/94 95% Effective after election 3. Downtown Riverfront Plan 5/01/94 11/01/94 60% CDC, Parks Board review of alt.'s 4. Comp. Sanitary Sewer Plan 8/20/91 10/18/94 90% COW Review 5. Comp. Stormwater Plan 7/21/91 10/18/94 90% COW Review 6. Comp. Plan Goals, Policies 4/01/94 10/25/94 90% COW Review 7. Comp. Plan Land Use Plan 7/15/94 12/01/94 60% PC Review/Research 8. Chaska Int. Agreement 7/01/93 2/01/95 30% Rural Density Current Planning 1. Building Permits 8/01/94 8/31/94 Ongoing 26 Residential permits 1 Commercial permits 2 Industrial permits 2. Planning Reports 8/01/94 8/31/94 Ongoing 0 Variances 0 Appeal of BOAA 1 CUP 0 CUP Reviews 4 Preliminary Plats 3 Final Plats 0 PUDs 0 Rezoning 0 Vacations 0 Minor Subdivisions 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 1 Text / Official Map Reviews 1 Site Plan Review 3. Enforcement 8/01/94 8/31/94 Ongoing 5 Zoning Code Violations 4 Resolved Violations Management Information Systems (MIS) 1. GIS Stage One 10/01/93 12/31/94 10% Awaiting Digitizing 2. Evaluate Scheduling Software 5/01/94 10/01/94 25% In progress 3. Network Security 5/01/94 10/01/94 5% Waiting on Input 4. Quarterly Staff Work Program 5/20/94 9/15/94 50% In Progress 5. MIS Database Development 7/7/94 12/31/94 10% Beginning 6. Project Mgmt. Database 8/01/94 12/31/94 25% Building Forms 7. Windows Training/Evaluation 8/15/94 10/01/94 10% In Progress 8. Install Windows (City wide) 8/01/94 3/01/95 15% In Progress Monthly Progress Report Planning Department Continued BOAA / PC Meeting 9-08-94 PC Meeting 9-08-94 The Meadows West Preliminary Plat Continued to 9/22 Monnens First Addn. Preliminary Plat Continued to 9/22 Monnens First Addn. Final Plat Continued to 9/22 Zoning Text Amend. Mining Hours Continued to 9/22 Comp. Plan Amend. Stormwater Mgmt. Continued to 9/22 Comp. Plan Amend. Sanitary Sewer Plan Rec. Approval The Meadows 9th Surveyor's Correction Rec. Approval St. Francis Site Plan Concept Discussion Other Items Before the Planning Commission Set Special Planning Commission Meeting September 22, 1994 PC Meeting 9-22-94 The Meadows West Preliminary Plat Rec. Approval The Meadows West 1st Final Plat Rec. Approval Monnens First Addn. Preliminary Plat Rec. Approval Monnens First Addn. Final Plat Rec. Approval Zoning Text Amend. Mining Hours Continued Comp. Plan Amend. Stormwater Mgmt. Rec. Approval {WP51\DOCS\TERRIE1PCREPORT.SEP} 9/30/94 ri N linnesota Department of Employee --- Relations Leadership and partnership in human resource management October 19, 1994 Barry A. Stock Shakopee 129 Holmes St. South Shakopee, MN 55379- Dear 5379 Dear Barry Stock: Congratulations! I am very pleased to send you the enclosed notification of compliance with the Local Government Pay Equity Act. Since the law was passed in 1984, jurisdictions throughout Minnesota have been working diligently to meet the requirements of the act, and I commend your hard work and commitment to achieving compliance. As you know, our department adopted a rule specifying procedures and criteria for measuring compliance, and information about your situation is enclosed. If you have any questions about the materials or about pay equity in general, please contact Pay Equity Coordinator, Faith Zwemke at 612-296-2653. One of the things the rule requires is that our department notify each jurisdiction when the next pay equity report is due. In your case, this date is January 31, 1997, and we will be sending you forms and instructions at a later time. Also, this notice and results of the compliance review are public information and must be supplied upon request to any interested party. Again, congratulations on a job well done! Sincerely, FFU,f.G`t'T. , Bruce H. JohnsA Acting Commissioner Enclosures 200 • • , MN 55155-1603 • l 297-2003 • _���:cnrennial otticc Rl�l�. • 6�8 C:r.3,ir 5t. • tit. P.+ul, _ TDD((�I�) .-fin equal uppornmit\empl+,�er Metropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future Wastewater Services October DATE: 17, 1994 TO: ALL CITY MANAGERS SUBJECT: 1995 SAC RATES The Metropolitan Council - Wastewater Services has established the 1995 SAC rates. Effective January 1, 1995, the SAC rate will be $850 for most communities, and $755 for communities who do not have metropolitan interceptor service. These communities are Cottage Grove, Hastings and Stillwater. The 1995 rates reflect an increase of $50 and $65, respectively. SAC is collected by your community as users connect to the Metropolitan Disposal System or as a user's potential or peak sewage discharge increases. The SAC funds collected pay for the reserve capacity portion of the debt service incurred to expand and improve sewer facilities. These facilities provide the sewer collection and treatment service stipulated for your community in the Metropolitan Council's comprehensive sewer plan. If you have any questions, please contact Sandra Selby at 229-2118. ' Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, r,; d Lois I. Spear Controller LIS:SLS:kme SACRATE.SLS cc: Building Inspections Department Sandra Selby, MCPS Donald B l uhm, MCLS • 230 East Fifth Street St.Paul,Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 222-8423 Fax 229-2183 TDD/TTY 229-3760 fCI I• a.� ' a Minnesota Department of Transportation Is, Transportation Building of 395 John Ireland Boulevard , Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 • f October 10, 1994 296-6967 Mr. Dennis Kraft City Admin. of Shakopee C. Hall: 129 Holmes Street Shakopee, MN 55379-1376 In reply refer to: 7300 State Proj. No. 7009 County of Scott Notice of Release of a portion of Trunk Highway No. 169 Release No. 1043 Dear Mr. Kraft: Attached is a Notice of Release of a portion of Trunk Highway No. 169. This will be effective November 1, 1994, and the description reads as follows: Beginning in the City of Shakopee at a point on the southerly side of the state highway right of way of New Trunk Highway No. 169, said point is located approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of the centerlines of Holmes Street and First Avenue; thence easterly along the centerline of said First Avenue for approximately 1080 feet and there terminating. The subject portion of road reverts to the jurisdiction of the City of Shakopee in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 161.16 and 161.24 (and Acts amendatory thereto). If you require additional information, call Mr. Neal Bartels, Office of Right of Way and Surveys, at the above number, or write this office. Sincerely, AZJ ' trs ,, K. F. Rasmussen, Director Office of Right of Way and Surveys Enclosure: Release No. 1043 R22219G.R1 - r-c;. al oD Or?uflity emcloye;r • ' Minnesota Department of Transportation ' Transportation Building . °" 395 John Ireland Boulevard • ' Saint Paul.Minnesota 55155 1899 . ?i 296-6967 1 ^{ ' Y, s a ) ii Maint. Area No. Metro Release No. 1043 • t State Proj. No. 7009 R22219G.R1 )NOTICE OF RELEASE OF TRUNK HIGHWAY To: Mr. Dennis Kraft City Admin. of Shakopee C. Hall:'`129 Holmes Street Shakopee, MN 55379-1376 • e" You are hereby notified that portions of Trunk Highway No. 169 have been definitely designated and located by Order No. 76393 and that the portions of trunk highway not included within the right of way of said definite location are hereby released to the City of Shakopee as follows: , r , Beginning in the City of Shakopee at.a point on the southerly side of the state highway right of way of New Trunk Highway No. 169, said point is located approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of the centerlines of Holmes Street and First Avenue, thence easterly along the centerline of said First Avenue for approximately 1080 feet and there terminating. This release to be effective as of November 1. 1994. Dated Oct /3)/4/74' *' a I. '. Denn , .._-I Co es missioner of Transportation (This notice is being sent to the County Auditor and to all affected governing bodies within the county in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 161.16 and 161.24 and acts amendatory thereto). • ty' • An equal opportunity employer ' ' • S1:ATE OF. MINrII:SOIA COUNTY OF RAh.'SEY u :yi The undersigned, being a duly appointed agent of the Commissioner for tho purpose cf <r riifyin9 copies of dh ders issued by the Commission^r orf t.nnsr+ortaliun herrabti certifies that th.s is a true and corrort copy of tho Com- miss oner' Order in tl a Tilos of the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation. Dated this d o , ,19 # Io MEMO TO: Shakopee City Council FROM: Lindberg S. Ekola, Planning Director RE: Land Acquisition for Independent School District 720 DATE: October 26, 1994 NON AGENDA INFORMATION ITEM: At the October 20, 1994 meeting, the Shakopee Planning Commission passed a motion which found the proposed land acquisition for Independent School District (ISD) 720 being in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Attached are Exhibit's A and B which provide a description of the property in question. At a meeting earlier this year, the City Council authorized the acquisition of the identified land on Exhibit B. This is a parcel which the school district desired but was unable to purchase as quickly as the City could. City staff will pursue the closing of this property in the next few weeks. If you have any questions, please contact Karen Marty or Dennis Kraft. Thank you. LSE/pmp ISD720 "1"- sg• �. — :tialjEaaae5a - - -EXHIBIT A ' "e tirotttl fit.. L]�._D A�E3'EVE--ii-E3E-:- i 5 ®I® If ictal I \� D 4. -- . • "A 111171 [ii1111111NICIiii.h. 'it,',It• i 1 'IC' '' ' t 7155Egrirs ,,,,./: . .- v., . -`-ite ..?:,:n...: .1.,44c'W .1-;:d 1. ,_ ., .E=3! ... 1! ,-.i".. 'll EF"--me int.f-' . a ".,S. L•ft l." '*.''. . 1471"EL a\fr41,00, 4) I i ..- 747/._ , _____T , :::.„, . . „ow , - ..--- rii.. - �Y .77 tcli - ' -+-- u< i R1 . .-,1-041110110111.111.1111 MATCH UNE I • AG :4h1 • R4 CJ LIMITS a • AG Y_ AG AGRICULTURE CCKD ANC a„ �. JCL 7 I- R 1 _RURAL _RESIDENTIAL Ri r: R2-_-URBAN4 RESIDENTIAL R3: MID DENSITY,• RES.. 1 R4 MULTI-FAMILY RES. SbEtraLT r I B1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS , "� B2 COMMUNITY BUSINESS S nr. ...,_/„....,..i.' 1 , B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS :- 11 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL s I-112 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL A O'DOWDQs) RTD RACETRACK DISTRICT FA i4jLAKE I-1 S SHCRELAND : : :' FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT - - - MANDATORY PUD hieNo 94114 L-,..,...,!,)•••• ` EXHIBIT B Bio Shakopee School District — RopeiglldGus' 13030.Townline Avenue. . --- -_...._ . . — •, ' City__Shakopee _•_ Count Scott StaN nn __ [puma upuouu 22ifY ender lShakopee School District C ' ROA. L 1, 1 , - ye • ssv ,, reties ssNp ': • 14N:0 • . •e ��� - • . . . • • • A :ND(p(NO(Nr $CNo01, astawT N• 728 :as.a» • 4C • 4. , . • • r • • • • NOM s " • { 4? ) • EXHIBIT "A' . II,' .•;•'''•,:',....•- , , Parcel A: All that part of the Northeast;Quarter of the Northeast Quarter INC 1/4 of NE 1/4) Sectten•Twenty:four",•1241, Township One Hundred fifteen (115) North, Range•Tw!nty;.three (231 Vest. Scott County, Minnescorner of Sectione2d, Township,13...Ringsd as ning at 23; thenceSouththeNortheast ,'. the East line of said Section 24, 241.81 feet. thence Northwesterly parallel with the North line of said Section 21. 241.81 Sectionfe24. thence 241.81North fest parallel. the northerly line of Section line s Section24; thence Southeasterly on said North line 241.81 feet to the place of beginning; excepting therefrom the Northerly 33.0 feet and the Easterly 33.0 feet for county road right of way, Also. the South 50 feet of the North 291.81teat of the East 241.81 feet of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4, excepting therelrillthe Easterly 33.0 Leat thereof for county road right of way: in Section 24. Township 115, Range 23, Scott County. Minnesota. Parcel B: ._ ,' , �••, All that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24. Township 115, Range 23. Scott County. Minnesota. described as follows: Beginning at a point on the north 1 line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter. distant 241.feet wet 8 parallels with fthe heast line asof cornert said Northeast CQuarter hence Southerly of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 241.81 feet; thence westerly parallel with the north line of said Northeast Quarter of the .?:ortheest Quarter a distance of 405.12 feet; thence northerly parallel with the east line of said Northeast Quarter of t:I. Northeast Quarter a distance of 241.81 feet; thence easterly '`,.'•' the point of beginning. except the northerly 33 feet thereof :..: milt? Road No. 77. • . leek M,r,Monk 0:21013114 k. 4 it MEMO TO: Shakopee City Council FROM: Lindberg S. Ekola, Planning Director RE: Scott County Comprehensive Plan Update John Shardlow Presentation DATE: October 26, 1994 NON AGENDA INFORMATION ITEM: At the October 20, 1994 meeting, Mr. John Shardlow of Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban, Inc. gave a presentation to the Shakopee Planning Commission on the Scott County Comprehensive Plan update. Attached is a copy of the material that he distributed to the Planning Commission for their review. In his presentation, Mr. Shardlow noted that the focus of the County planning effort was to establish a better process growth management. His presentation included a brief overview of the detailed inventory in which Mr. Shardlow's firm has prepared for the planning process. The inventory included several topics including land ownership patterns, environmental features including wetlands, the number of houses per square mile, as well as the existing land uses in the County. He also presented the proposed Land Use Plan for the County's Comprehensive Plan. The plan proposes that there be urban expansion areas for those township areas adjacent to Shakopee, Prior Lake, and Savage. The proposed urban expansion areas would allow a rural density of less than one dwelling unit per ten acres. The plan is proposing that urbanizing townships prepare and adopt an official map for future streets, parks, open space, and future community facilities prior to additional large lot subdivisions occurring. The attachment includes a summary of findings and recommendations on County planning process. LSE/pmp COUNTY 1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: • Scott County has experienced significant, unsewered, large lot residential development in its townships, well beyond the Metropolitan Urban Service Area boundary. • Substantial vacant land remains within several of the incorporated cities, between the MUSA Line and the developing townships beyond, thus creating a "leap frog" development pattern. • The development that is occurring within the townships is not being organized in accordance with any adopted long range master plan. • The subdivision of lots within the townships has evidenced an over reliance on the County road system for providing direct access to individual parcels. This pattern, along with the related lack of an internal street system to provide direct land access, will cause inefficiencies in the future use of internal parcels. The large number of curb cuts on the County roads will add to the cost of future County highway improvement projects. Scott County Comprehensive Plan Update Findings and Recommendations September 22, 1994 2 • Development within the "Urban Expansion Areas" immediately south of Savage and Prior Lake has occurred with no planning for the extension of urban services. Consequently, (according to representatives of both cities) the cost of extending municipal services will exceed the value of some of the properties to be served, thus, presenting a major obstacle to the orderly extension of urban services. • The large number of lots that have been created and the amount of unsewered development that has occurred has caused adverse effects related to land economics within the County. The abundance of large lots has inflated land values and threatens the long term viability of agriculture within the County. • The current populations within Credit River and New Market Townships exceed the population within the Cities of Savage and Prior Lake 15 years ago. Both of these townships desire the ability to develop entirely with non-agricultural uses. Neither township currently has a comprehensive plan to guide this growth. • While there has been some recent annexation from Jackson Township to the City of Shakopee, there is no plan for the future urbanization of the remainder of Jackson and Louisville Townships. Neither township desires further annexation. Scott County Comprehensive Plan Update Findings and Recommendations September 22. 1994 3 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS: To respond to these findings and to accomplish the Goals and Objectives adopted by the Scott County Planning Committee, the Consultants and County Staff recommend the following: • The County's Comprehensive Plan should strongly endorse the expansion of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area within the remaining undeveloped portions of the incorporated municipalities. The County should work with the cities and the Metropolitan Council to accomplish this change. • The Plan should strongly encourage those townships that are experiencing intense development pressure to consider incorporation, consolidation with adjacent cities, or meaningful annexation agreements with adjacent cities. • Outside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area, the County should strive to comply with the Metropolitan Council's 64 per 640 acres density standard. Where existing development patterns and densities preclude compliance, the townships should be allowed to complete the development of the area with densities compatible with the existing development. However, the completion of the necessary steps to complete an effective Scott County Comprehensive Plan Update Findings and Recommendations :September 22. 1994 4 official map shall take precedence over achieving consistency with surrounding densities. • The Plan should strongly encourage and support clustering, with appropriate compliance with the adopted official map and required urban overlay plats. Minimum lot sizes within clusters should be governed by the requirements for providing for successful on-site sewage disposal and to facilitate the efficient future subdivision to urban densities. • Before additional large lot subdivision is permitted in the urbanizing townships, they should prepare and adopt an official map for future streets, parks and open space and future community facilities. When future subdivisions are approved they should be consistent with the official map, provide access from a township roadway system and include the filing of an urban overlay plat. The location of the house should be on one of the future, urban sized lots, and sufficient right of way and all necessary easements should be provided to facilitate the eventual transition of these areas from rural to urban densities. Scott County Comprehensive Plan Update Findings and Recommendations September 22. 1994 5 • The County should adopt new ordinances, definitions, and/or stronger standards for the following: On-site sewage disposal systems; need better maintenance & inspection Mining Operations; need an improved ordinance Home Extended Businesses; need better standards Interim Uses (Including School Bus Services); need a new ordinance Woodland Preservation; need a new ordinance Accessory Structure Sizes; need better standards Design Standards (Parking, Signs); need better standards Scott County Comprehensive Plan Undate Findings and Rpcnmmondntinnv ,Contomhor 27 1004 t i � 1994 0 lc c 1 0 1 994 Fleeting Schedules SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SRT Oct 30 Oct 31 Nov 1 Nov 2 Nov 3 Nov 4 Nov 5 7:00pm City 7:30pm Planning Council Commission Residential Phasing/Phase 2 Zoning P.H. Nov 6 Nov 7 Nov S Nov 9 Nov 10 Nov 11 Nov 12 4:30pm Public General Election 5:30pm COW - City Hall Closed Utilities Zoning Map - Veterans Day Review (Phase 2) Nov 13 Nov 14 Nov 15 Nov 16 Nov 17 Nov 10 Nov 19 7:00pm City 5:30pm 7:30pm Planning Council Community Commission Zoning Map Development Approval Commission Nov 20 Nov 21 Nov 22 Nov 23 Nov 24 Nov 25 Nov 26 5:30pm COW - City Hall Closed City Hall Closed Land Use - Thanksgiving - Holiday Review MUSA Nov 27 Nov 20 Nov 29 Nov 30 Dec 1 Dec 2 Dec 3 7:00pm Park & 5:30pm COW - 7:30pm Planning Recreation Comm Center Commission Phase I - Public Hearing Final Report Comp Plan Dec 4 Dec 5 Dec 6 Dec 7 Dec O Dec 9 Dec 10 4:30pm Public 7:00pm City 7:00pm Public 7:30pm Planning Utilities Council Hearing Tax Commission Levy Public Hearing If Needed • • BUSINESS UPDATE FROM CITY HALL Volume 8 No. 11 # Dear Chamber Member: November 1, 1994 Administration Park and Recreation On Tuesday,October 25, 1994 the Shakopee City Council Lifetime Fitness is currently in the process of completing a appointed Jon Brekke to fill the unexpired City Council term market analysis,construction cost estimates and conceptual of Kris Dirks. Mr.Brekke has been a resident of Shakopee design for the proposed community center facility. A for 2 1/2 years. Mr. Brekke was selected from a list of 10 Committee of the Whole meeting has been scheduled for candidates who expressed interest in the position. Tuesday,November 29, 1994 at 5:00 P.M. in the Shakopee City Council Chambers. The purpose of the Committee of Earlier this year the City initiated annexation proceedings for the Whole meeting will be to allow Lifetime Fitness a portion of Jackson Township North of the Southerly representatives to make their fmal presentation to City bypass. The effective date for annexation will be November Council with respect to their findings. City Council will use 9, 1994. The rezoning of the properties in the annexation the information gathered by Lifetime Fitness to determine areas will become effective on Thursday, November 10, whether or not to proceed with the construction of a 1994. The properties will be rezoned to urban residential as community center. established in the annexation agreement. Planning Earlier this year the Shakopee HRA undertook the relocation and remodeling of a home in Shakopee that was given to PC Meeting 10-06-94 them by the Stans Foundation. The relocation and remodeling project was completed in early October. The MV Health Campus Preliminary PUD Continued to 10/20 then listed for sale with Dave Brown Realty. MV Health Campus Preliminary Plat Continued to 10/20 property was West View 7th Preliminary PUD Rec.Approval Prior to listing the property,the HRA specified that the home West View 7th Final PUD Rec.Approval must be sold to a first time home buyer with an adjusted Jack Brambilla CUP Amendment Approved income not to exceed$34,500. Within one week of listing, OneComm Corp. Zoning Map Amend.Rec. ApprovalOneComm Corp. CUP:Over 45' ht. Approved the property was sold at the original listing price of$79,000. Northstar Auto CUP: Move in Office Approved Closing is scheduled for December 15,1994. City of Shakopee Zoning Text Amend.Rec. Approval Fischer Aggregates CUP:Annual Review Approved City Clerk Other Items Before the Planning Commission Valley Fair PUD Conceptual Site Plan Discussion On October 4th City Council adopted resolutions of City of Shakopee Transportation Plan Discussion appreciation for Eugene Pass and Charles Ries for their years PC Meeting 10-20-94 of dedicated service on the Shakopee Fire Department. MV Health Campus Preliminary PUD Rec.Approval MC Health Campus Preliminary Plat Continued to 12/8 On October 4th City Council approved a currency exchange license for Shakopee Check Cashing, 1147 Canterbury Road. Other Items Before the Planning Commission Scott County Comp. Plan Update Presentation City of Shakopee Comp. Plan Review Discussion Ind. School Dist. 720 Land Acquisition Review Police How does it affect meas a property owner? • The Special Incident Response Team has completed five Zoning ordinances are laws which regulate the uses of land. They also control the placement, height, bulk, and the coverage days of tactical training at Camp Dodge,Iowa. This years ofproperties within each zone. The location of zones within the training stressed close-knit team work to accomplish City are established on a zoning map. All property owners are scenarios involving hostage rescue and victim rescue. required to follow the laws adopted in the Zoning Ordinance and Officers also practiced special firearms training on four the Zoning Map. ; different ranges. Shakopee's team was declared the most improved tactical team over this past year. What is happening to the zoning on my properly? On September 21, 1994, agents from the Office of The Shakopee City Council adopted the new Zoning Ordinance Immigration and Naturalization Services were in Shakopee text on June 7, 1994. The previous Zoning Ordinance, which searching for illegal aliens. Ten illegal aliens were arrested was adopted in 1979, was seriously out of date with current in Shakopee on that day,and in an eight day period a total of development trends. 168 people were apprehended in Minnesota. The illegal aliens were given three options. They could post bond and In the process of updating the ordinance, some new zones were await an immigration hearing; go to jail pending their created. A zoning map for the city needs to be adopted to hearing,or voluntarilyreturn to Mexico. INS agents advise reflect these:changes. The new zoning map proposed to be g adopted generally follows the same zoning patterns established that all chose to return to Mexico. on the old map. The new zoning map basically translates the zones from the.old ordinance into very similar zones on the new Public Works/Engineering map. Few significant changes in the property uses are proposed. Vierling Drive from C.R. 15 to Presidential Lane is under How can I find out more details about my property? , construction and progressing smoothly. Information on both the new and old zoning ordinances and The Downtown Streetscape Project is basically completed on their respected maps are available in the lobby of Shakopee City First Avenue between Holmes and Sommerville Streets Hall. Property owners and residents are invited to review this except for the installation of the light poles and clean-up. material during City Hall office hours, Monday through Friday, The parking lot expansion at Second Avenue and Lewis 8:00 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. Street is ready for paving. When will the meetings be held on the new zoning? New subdivision projects that are under construction or just beginning are Minnesota Valley 8th Addition, Meadows The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the new West and Prairie Bend. zoning map on Thursday, November 3, 1994, at 7:00 P.M. in the Shakopee City Council Chambers in City Hall. The City Council is scheduled to review the new zoning map on ZONING FACT SHEET Thursday, November 15, 1994. Adoption of the new Zoning Map If you have any questions, call the Shakopee What is Zoning? Planning Department at 445-3650 and ask for the staff planner. Thank You. Zoning began in the early 1900s when people in parts of the United States decided they wanted to keep certain noises, odors, traffic, dust and other objectionable things away from their homes. Over the years, cities like Shakopee have been divided DON'T FORGET TO VOTE NOV. H'I??t t into areas or zones in which only certain activities could take place. * 1(2 Monthly Project Report - Submitted by Barry Stock October 26, 1994 Project Start Complete Status Comments 1. Clinic RFP's ? ? 0% Intern Project 2 . AWAIR Program ? ? 0% Intern Project 3 . Perform Employee 11/1 12/15 0% Evaluations 4 . Develop Pay for Perf. Program 4/1 12/1 50% Intern Project 5. Complete Dept. Reorganization Plan 3/1 9/1 100% 6. City Newsletter 8/2 9/8 100% Issue #2 7. Stan House Project 2/15 8/1 98% 8 . Downtown Utlility 3/24 ? 5% On hold until Easements after new Public Hearing 9 . Seek Alternatives to 7/1 9/15 0% identify Downtown Development Interest 10. City Residents Guide 4/15 7/1 25% 11. Complete steps to 8/21 10/15 25% create Econ. Dev. Auth. 12 . Complete Lifetime 8/22 10/1 100% Due Diligence 14 . Implement new Transit 7/1 10/1 100% Fixed Route Service 15. Building Dept. Permit 9/10 11/15 5% Survey 16. Complete Comm. Center 10/10 11/29 30% Analysis - Phase 1 17 . Complete 1995 Rec. Fee 10/15 11/21 75% Schedule 18 . Complete City Nesletter 11/1 12/1 0% Issue #3 Mail12/6/94 19 . Complete Warming House 10/15 12/15 10% Remodeling 20. Complete Contract Negotiations a. Sergeants 11/9 ? 0% b. Police ? ? 0% c. City Hall ? ? 0% 21. Complete 1995 Non-union 12/2 1/15 0% Pay Plan 22 . Develop Employee Training 12/1 12/31 0% Program MEMO TO: Shakopee City Council FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Mid American Festivals Lease - Former City Hall Building DATE: October 25, 1994 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Approximately two weeks ago staff presented to City Council a possible tenant for the former City Hall building. (Mid American Festivals) Unfortunately, Mid American Festivals has established a lease agreement with Canterbury Inn. It appears that Canterbury Inn agreed to an exchange of Renaissance Tickets in lieu of rent collections . Staff will continue to seek possible tenants for the former City Hall building. 402 RESOLUTION NO. 4114 V A RESOLUTIOI APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF JON BREKKE TC, SERVE AS COMMISSIONER FOR THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee on September 27, 1994. accepted the resignation of Commissioner Dirks fromethe Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council that members serve as commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority concurrently with their council terms; and WHEREAS, Jon Brekke was appointed to fill the unexpirediterm of Councilmember Dirks on October 25, 1994 . NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1 . That Jon Brekke is hereby appointed as Commissioner of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority until December 31, 1995. 2 . That the above-named person will serve until a new Council member has taken the oath of office as a member of the City Council and is qualified as a Commissioner by taking the Commissioners' oath. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 1st day of November, 1994 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney TENTATIVE AGENDA REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 1, 1994 LOCATION: City Hall, 129 Holmes Street South Mayor Gary Laurent presiding Oath of Office of Newly Appointed Official , 1] Roll Call at 7: 00 P.M. 2] Appointment to Housing & Redevelopment Authority - Res. 4114 3 ] Approval of Agenda 4] Recess for H.R.A. Meeting 5] Re-convene 6] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 7] Mayor's Report 8] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS 9] Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. ) 10] Approval of Minutes: October 4th, 12th, and 18th, 1994 11] Communications: None 12 ] PUBLIC HEARINGS: a] 7 : 00 P.M. - Proposed undergrounding of overhead electric and pavement to the Downtown Alleys, Project No. 1993-9 - Res. No. 4111 b] 7 : 30 P.M. - Proposed assessments for the 1993 Reconstruc- tion Project, 1993-7 - Res. No. 4110 13 ] Recommendations from Boards and Commissions: a] Huber Park Development TENTATIVE AGENDA November 1, 1994 ` Page -2- 14] Reports from Staff: a] Downtown Alleys Consultant Contract *b] Pawnbroker's Employee License - Mark Allen Saurer *c] Farm Lease for 1995 d] Murphy's Land Sublease, - memo on table e] Sanitary Sewer Rates,'- tabled 10/18 *f] Approve Bills in the Amount of $154, 305. 82 g] Westside Sanitary Sewer Flow Allocation Study *h] 10th Avenue Stop Sign Warrant Study i] Minnesota Police Recruitment System j ] CR-77/Fuller Street Update 15] Resolutions and Ordinances: ' *a] Res. No. 4109 - Establishing Procedures Relating To Compliance With Reimbursement Bond Regulations Under The Internal Revenue Code *b] Res. No. 4112 - Setting Public Hearing on Street Light at Valley Park Drive & Valley Industrial Boulevard So. *c] Res. No. 4113 - Setting Public Hearing on Improvements to CR-16 from CR-17 to Approximately 1000' East of CR-83 *d] Res. No. 4117 - Setting Public Hearing on St. Francis Regional Medical Center Watermain Improvements, Project No. 1995-2 16] Other Business: a] b] c] 17] Adjourn to Tuesday, November 15, 1994 at 7 : 00 P.M. Dennis R. Kraft City Administrator Next Committee of the Whole meeting is November 9, 1994 at 5: 30 pm TENTATIVE AGENDA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Regular Session November 1, 1994 1 . Roll Call at 7 : 00 P.M. 2 . Approve minutes of the October 4, 1994 . 3 . Other Business a) b) 4 . Adjourn Dennis R. Kraft Executive Director OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 4, 1994 Chrmn. Lynch called the meeting to order at 7 : 05 p.m. with Comm. Beard, Sweeney and Mayor Laurent present . Also present : Dennis Kraft, City Administrator; Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator; Lindberg Ekola, Planning Director; Karen Mary, City Attorney; Dave Nummer, City Engineer, and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk. Beard/Sweeney moved to approve the minutes of September 6, 1994 . Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock stated that staff was previously directed to solicit proposals from realtors within the Shakopee area for listing the sale of the house, located at 1126 east 2nd Avenue. He stated that three proposals had been received, that each had completed a market analysis consistent with H.R.A. direction. He stated that commission rates varied from 4 .7% to 6%. The proposed property listing values also varied from 72 . 9 to the mid 80' s . Mr. Stock stated that staff recommends going with Dave Brown Realty, who submitted the lowest commission rate of 4 . 7% . Comm. Beard asked if Dave Brown Realty would have trouble cooperating with other brokers at this rate or attracting prospects from other brokers. Mr. Stock stated that Mr. Brown said in his proposal, that the selling agent would be paid a commission of 2 .7%. He did not think that there would be a problem finding other realtors to participate in marketing the property. Comm. Laurent asked how the market analysis varied between them. Mr. Stock stated that they all used a market approach. Mr. Brown , was the only one to also use a cost and income capitalization approach. Beard/Sweeney moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into an agreement with Dave Brown Realty for the disposition of the property located at 1124 east 2nd Avenue. Motion carried unanimously. Chrmn. Lynch adjourned the H.R.A. meeting at 7 : 10 p.m. Dennis R. Kraft Executive Director Esther TenEyck Recording Secretary OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 4, 1994 Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 7 : 00 p.m. with Cncl . Lynch, Beard, and Sweeney present . Also present : Dennis Kraft, City Administrator; Barry Stock, Ass' t . City Administrator; Lindberg Ekola, Planning Director; Karen Marty, City Attorney; Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer; and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk. Items added to the agenda: 15a) The Downtown Streetscape' s Special Provisions, Project No. 1993-12 . Sweeney/Beard moved to approve the agenda as modified. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent recessed the City Council Meeting for an H.R.A. Meeting at 7 : 05 p.m. Mayor Laurent reconvened the City Council Meeting at 7 :10 p.m. Liaison reports were given by Councilmembers . Mayor Laurent gave the Mayor' s report . Mayor Laurent asked if any members of the audience would like to address the City Council on any item not on the agenda. Cletus Link, 1216 Jefferson St. , Shakopee, MN, approached the podium. He stated that sometime ago he asked City staff about obtaining some building permits on his subdivision and was told that it is City policy that building permits are not issued until curb, gutter and rock are in place. However, he later observed that approximately four building permits had been issued. He asked what the City policy was. Mr. Nummer stated that it is City policy that building permits are not allowed until emergency vehicle access can be provided to the site; that is having a gravel base. He stated that in order to do that, utilities must be put in. As for the four. lots Mr. Link spoke of, those are directly adjacent to already paved surfaces that were left off in previous developments. They were meant to be extended in this development, and a note has been placed on those building permits that a temporary access be maintained off of the paved road into those permitted areas at all times. He stated that this is not a new practice, it has been done on several occasions. Discussion followed. Mr. Stock encouraged Mr. Link to apply for his building permit immediately and that it would be reviewed at that time . Added to Consent : 13b) Lion' s Park Warming House Improvements, 13m) Resolution No. 4101 Establishing a Cost Participation Policy for the Downtown Alleys Project, Project No. 1993-9 . Official Proceedings of the October 4, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -2- Sweeney/Beard moved to approve the Consent Business as modified. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Beard moved to approve the minutes of the September 6, 1994 . (Motion approved under consent business) Mayor Laurent opened the public hearing on the proposed assessments for Valley Park 11th Addition, Project No. 1993-10. Mr. Nummer stated that this has been finalized and pointed out that there was a typing error on the first page in the second paragraph. The final costs should be as noted on the back of the page. Mayor Laurent asked if anyone in the audience would like to address the City Council on this issue. There being no one interested Mayor Laurent closed the public hearing. Lynch/Sweeney offered Resolution No. 4095, A Resolution Adopting Assessments for the Valley Park 11th Addition, Project No. 1993-10 and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Ms. Cox stated that Frank Marzario of Shakopee Check Cashing had made application to renew his currency exchange license. She stated that the license was approved by the Minnesota Department of Commerce and that state law requires the municipalities where the application is going totake place to hold a public hearing and take action approving or denying the licensing. She stated that the Chief of Police advised her that there was no reason for the application not to be approved, and that Mr. Richards was present on behalf of Mr. Marzario and available for any questions. Cncl. Beard asked Ms. Cox how often the license had to be renewed. Ms. Cox replied "yearly" . Mayor Laurent asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak to this issue. Having no one interested the public hearing was closed. Beard/Lynch offered Resolution No. 4098, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, MN, Approving The Application of Shakopee Check Cashing for A Currency ,Exchange License at 1147 Canterbury Road, and moved its adoption. i Motion carried unanimously. Official Proceedings of the October 4, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -3- Beard/Sweeney moved to remove Item 12a) Amendment to the Zoning Map - Amend the Boundaries of the Floodplain to Exclude Portions of Valleyfair from the table. Motion carried unanimously. Cncl .Sweeney asked which zoning map was being amended. Ms . Marty stated it was the existing zoning map with the old ordinance. Sweeney/Beard offered Ordinance 383, Fourth Series, an Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map to Exclude Certain Portions of the Valleyfair Amusement Park from the Floodplain District, and move its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Beard offered Resolution No. 4102, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending the 1981 Comprehensive Plan to Reflect the Proposed Expansion of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area to Include Certain Lands North of the Shakopee Bypass and West of County Road 79, and moved its adoption. (Motion approved under consent business) Sweeney/Beard offered Resolution No. 4093, A Resolution Approving the Final Plat for Prairie Bend 1st Addition, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business) Mr. Ekola stated that the Meadows West development is located in an R-2 zoning district and the Planning Commission recommends the approval. He stated that there City Council needs to look at trail crossings. In the staff report they have identified four alternatives. They recommend that there be some connections of trails between the subdivision and the Upper Valley Drainage Way. He stated that there are crossings needed to provide access for the subdivision to the Upper Valley Trail . Mr. Ekola stated that the developer is proposing that a street be constructed in alignment with the MnDOT easement . Cncl . Sweeney stated that he was not sure he understood the location of the trail crossings . Mr. Ekola approached the podium and explained on the map, the location of the trails . He stated that one of the things required of the developers along the Upper Valley Drainage Way with the subdivision plats are pedestrian easements at mid-block locations tb provide access to the drainage way itself. Mr. Ekola stated that iL was acceptable to the developer to construct and provide easements for the trails and to the lots within his subdivision. Official Proceedings of the October 4, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -4- However, this section of the Upper Valley Drainage Way was acquired by MnDOT. Mayor Laurent asked if the issue was that the pedestrian pathways between the lots and crossing the Upper Valley Drainage Way, or whether they were not discussing what was going on between the lots . Mr. Ekola stated that between the lots was not an issue for the developer, that he is willing to pay for those facilities of the trails within the Upper Valley Drainage Way. Mayor asked if the developer would not only be providing easements but would also be constructing a trail there. Mr. Ekola stated that that was correct . Cncl . Sweeney asked if in saying trail crossings, are they talking about a bridge. Mr. Ekola stated that it would be a trail on the surface at ground level . He stated that there are trails on one side or the other and in order to get from a neighborhood or a park or a school there are trail crossings that have to go down into the drainage way and back up. Cncl . Sweeney asked who provided the other crossings. Mr. Ekola stated that both City projects have been constructed for the trail crossings as well as for the developers . Wayne Fleck approached the podium and stated he went to the end of their plat and that is where the trail stopped. He stated that the City has put the trail system in ,all the way through the Meadows and into Meadows West . His concern was that the State owns the land and he didn' t have a right to go on to the land and he didn' t feel the slopes were compatible to a trail. He stated he didn' t feel the trail would stay because the drainage way is made for water, not for a trail system in the bottom. He stated if he was forced to construct the trail he would construct it once but wanted no liability for washing out what soever. • Cncl . Sweeney stated that there are trail crossings which go down into the drainage way and come out and asked if there have been any problems with them washing out. ' Mr. Ekola stated that there had been but that it takes time for sod and vegetation to take root to establish a drainage way. Mayor Laurent asked how access to the trail was obtained and who constructed it . • Official Proceedings of the October 4, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -5- Mr. Nummer stated that access to Vierling Drive was constructed by the City, that the City constructed most of them and the developer was required to construct one. Mayor Laurent stated that this issue raised policy questions . He stated that his concern was that just because someone' s development ends up in a place where an amenity is needed, that ends up providing benefits to an area, should that developer be forced to incur all of the benefits of that or whether that is something that all of the developers should be paying for. Cncl . Sweeney stated that he understood Mr. Fleck' s opinion to be that he can' t put a trail in that will stay there. He stated that he felt it was unreasonable to ask someone to put in something that he' s convinced won't stay there and that he isn' t willing to accept liability for. Mr. Ekola stated that one of the reasons alternative No. 3 was identified was to provide a vehicle for the developer to provide for financial obligations. Cncl . Lynch stated that she was not sure if people would enter the trail in other places that everything had to meet A.D.A. requirements. She asked whether there were other trail crossings on other parts of the drainage way, and if there are, who paid for them. Mayor Laurent asked if there was any policy within the trail mapping that dictates who paid for what . Mr. Ekola stated that the trail plan development focused on the overall system. Mayor Laurent stated that requiring a developer, because he happens to be in an area of an amenity, places more merit in what we might be asking him to do when we don' t have a limit as to what this financial obligation would be because we don' t have a clue as to what kind of trail has to be built . Cncl . Sweeney stated he didn't think we could require the developer to provide an appropriate financial guarantee for the reason that we don' t know what it would be. Cncl . Lynch asked who was to maintain and repair the trails . Mayor Laurent stated that Mr. Fleck didn' t like the possibility of building these on state property in a situation that he views as a tough situation to build them# in. Mayor Laurent stated that if the position is that they would be willing to take park dedication fees, why not take the money and Official Proceedings of the October 4 , 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -6- then decide how to build these things and do it ourselves. Otherwise, by the time they get this figured out Mr. Fleck would be on to some other development . Cncl . Lynch stated if it is taken as a part of the dedication fee they would be setting policy and they need to think about that . Mayor Laurent stated that policy should be set at a Committee of the Whole Meeting. Sweeney/Lynch moved to not require the developer to construct the trail crossings in Meadows West . Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Lynch offered Resolution No. 4086, A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Plat for the Meadows West and the Final Plat for the Meadows West 1st Addition, and moved its adoption. Cncl . Sweeney asked Mr. Fleck if he was aware of the problems with some lots in Meadows 4th. Mr. Fleck stated that he was aware of them and they will be taken care of. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Lynch moved to hire an appraiser to perform an appraisal of the parcel (Meadows West) for the purpose of determining the park dedication fee and for the appraisal to be funded by the Park Reserve Fund. Motion carried unanimously. Cncl . Lynch requested that a discussion about policy on how the trails will be'handled be held at a Committee of the whole meeting in the near future. Cncl . Sweeney asked that this might be part of a modified or re- written subdivision ordinance. Ms. Marty stated that she expected to have this in place by January or February. Sweeney/Lynch moved to approve the Preliminary and Final Plat of Monnens First Addition, Resolution No. 4076 . (Motion carried under Consent Business) Mayor Laurent, having an interest in item 12f) Resolution No. 4092, a Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Approving the Preliminary Plat for Orc1ard Park, abstained from discussion and Official Proceedings of the October 4 , 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -7- turned the gavel over to Vice Mayor, Beard. Mr. Ekola stated that Laurent Builders has submitted an application for Preliminary Plat for Orchard Park, located east of County Road 77 and south of Vierling Drive. It covers approximately 32 acres and is currently in Jackson Township which is in the process of annexation. It is anticipated that the property would be zoned R-2 Urban Residential . He stated that the developer has proposed that the 10% twin home concept be waived for this subdivision. The proposed twin homes are located along the proposed highway 101 bypass project . The Planning Commission reviewed the request and are recommending approval of the preliminary plat subject to several conditions . They are not recommending that the 10% requirement on the number of twin homes within the overall subdivision be applied due to its location to the bypass. Cncl . Lynch asked how many twin homes they would be looking at if the 10% requirement were left out . Mr. Ekola state that there are 115 dwelling units . About 50-50 twin home, single families. Cncl . Sweeney asked if the R-2 that was being addressed was the old R-2 or the new R-2 . Ms . Marty stated that the only R-2 in effect is the old R-2 . Cncl . Sweeney stated since this wouldn't go into effect until the annexation is completed he thought the developer might be contemplating the new R-2 . Mr. Laurent approached the podium and stated that the zoning was not of importance to him. They looked at other development within the City and followed some of the guidelines that indicated that increasing densities along the bypass right of way was something that made sense and felt that it also made sense for this development . He stated that it would be acceptable if this area was designated as a twin homes and then you knew exactly which lots they would be on. He stated that one of the problems with just having 10 % is where twin homes are placed in a development has as much impact as to how many of them there are. Mr. Laurent stated that they have made an attempt to designate exactly which lots are twin home lots and which lots are single family lots . He stated that there are 115 units, 28 twin home lots but each lot is two units . Vice Mayor Beard asked Mr. Iraurent if he intended to put the twin homes on Apple Blossom Lane. Mr. Laurent stated "Yes, " that it made sense to have both sides of the street the same because then you get a feeling of a neighborhood if both sides of the street are the same. Official Proceedings of the October 4, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -8- Sweeney/Lynch offered Resolution No. 4092, A Resolution of The City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Approving the Preliminary Plat for Orchard Park, subject to the annexation process, and moved its adoption. Vice Mayor stated that the resolution did not have No. 9 of the staff recommendations . Mr. Link approached the podium and asked what the difference is between a single family lot, or a duplex, or a twin home next to a highway, because they are both lived in by people. He stated that it was his understanding that there was a rule of 10 to 1 ratio for duplexes in single family developments in the City of Shakopee. He also stated that if you want to change that you should be able to show a hardship and noted that there is none here. He pointed out that this could create a problem because every developer might say they want 50% duplexes in their single family development, and asked how can you deny them if this is approved. Cncl . Sweeney stated that this would be permissible under the new zoning ordinance if the mapping were completed. Vice Mayor Beard asked Mr. Ekola to explain why high-density next to urban traffic is a good idea. Mr. Ekola stated two reasons. The first is that multi-family lots are larger in dimension, and the second being that they tend to be clustered and share parking facilities . Often buildings can be used to create quiet spaces. He also stated that the annexation agreement with Jackson Township specified old R-2 zoning for this area and that the City would be limited to that . Motion carried unanimously. Vice-Mayor returned the gavel to Mayor Laurent. {,' Mr. Stock stated that staff was previously directed to pursue a police and financial background check on Lifetime Fitness . The Springsted report listed some areas of concern which related to Lifetime Fitness, which is a private company doing business in a public setting. The results of both investigations reveal that Lifetime Fitness is a good company and that the people that would be dealt with 'are of good character and therefore, staff is recommending to go ahead. However, Mr. Stock ' recommended one change to the action requested, that this is really a consultant contract and not a memorandum of understanding. He recommended authorizing the appropriate City officials to execute a consultant contract incorporating the elements of the • memorandum of understanding for the planning and design services for the proposed community center project . He stated that the cost for phase one is $25, 000 . 00 . . Official Proceedings of the October 4 , 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -9- Cncl . Sweeney stated that there are risks in going forward with this company, in that it is a new company. Mayor Laurent stated that he liked the fact that this is a small commitment and how they perform in phase one will be a better test of their abilities than what has been done so far. Cncl . Beard stated that through his personal experience with Mr. Akradi' s activities he has delivered what he has promised. He stated that for a company that has properly built and operated approximately 13 companies his level of confidence would be very high and stated that he was comfortable with the risks that Springsted noted in phase one. Lynch/Beard moved that the appropriate City officials be authorized to execute the Consultant Contract by and between the City of Shakopee and Lifetime Fitness for planning and preliminary design services associated with the proposed Community Center project . Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Beard moved that the former ice bubble equipment/storage building be remodeled to serve as a warming house with funding to be allocated from the 1994 Parks Division Budget ($2, 000) and Park Reserve Fund ($3, 000) and authorized staff to obtain cost quotations and proceed accordingly. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Beard moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the necessary documents associated with the Quit Claim Deed for the transfer of Murphy' s Landing property to the City from Scott County, (Motion carried under consent business . ) Discussion ensued on the proposed sublease between Murphy' s Landing and Paper Warehouse and the fact that the lease is for 25 years. Ms . Marty stated her concern about the fact that the City may eventually step into a lease that they are not a party to at this point . She stated that there are two ways of dealing with the concerns of Paper Warehouse. The first is to have a signed agreement with them, the second is to tell them that as the landlord the City is going to butt in on the agreement between Murphy' s Landing and Paper Warehouse and it would just be a 3-party agreement. Mayor Laurent stated he is not comfortable entering into this until the City knows what the lease is. Sweeney/Lynch moved to direst the City Attorney to review and where appropriate, modify the lease between Paper Warehouse and Murphy' s Landing. • Official Proceedings of the October 4, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -10- Cncl . Sweeney stated that the City has a responsibility to the taxpayers of the City of Shakopee and requires that they hold a greater degree of control because of the 25 years that are involved. Mr. Kraft suggested that this be discussed at the Committee of the Whole Meeting on October 12th. Sweeney/Lynch moved to table Murphy' s Landing, Recognition and Non- Disturbance Agreement . Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Beard moved to authorize the City Administrator to sign Fischer Aggregates, Inc. EAW Report as required. (Motion approved under consent business. ) Sweeney/Beard moved to direct staff to send a letter to the MPCA, indicating support for a negative declaration on the need for an EIS for the proposed Chaska Interceptor Phase I and II . (Motion carried under consent business. ) Lynch/Beard moved to remove Item 13g) Calling 1988A GO Improvement Bonds from the table. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent stated that by this action the City would be , capturing about $500, 000 . 00 . from the bonds. Lynch/Beard moved to direct staff to proceed with the process of calling the 1988A GO Improvement Bonds on February 1, 1995 . (Motion carried unanimously. ) Sweeney/Beard moved to approve bills in the Amount of $140, 869 . 26 . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Beard moved to approve the application and grant a Pawnbroker' s Employee License to Sevin Patrick Aksamit, Shakopee Pawn & Cash Company, 1147 Canterbury Road. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Sweeney/Beard moved to declare items listed herein as surplus property and authorize the City Administrator to sell or otherwise dispose of these items . [CC DOC #212] (Motion carried under consent business..)' Sweeney/Beard moved to direct staff to respectfully inform Mr. Griffin that the City is not interested in accepting responsibility for the street light at this time. (Motion carried under consent business . ) J Lynch/Sweeney moved to direct staff to prepare a report for removing snow on sidewalks adjacent to collector or higher status • streets. Official Proceedings of the October 4, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -11- Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Beard offered Resolution No. 4101, A Resolution Establishing a Cost Sharing Policy for the Downtown Alleys Project, Project No. 1993-9, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Beard offered Resolution No. 4075, a Resolution Setting the Public Hearing Date to Consider the Vacation of the Remainder of the Alley Located in Block 31, Shakopee Plat, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Beard offered Resolution No. 4087, A Resolution of Appreciation to Eugene Pass, and moved it adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Beard offered Resolution No. 4088, A Resolution of Appreciation to Charles Ries, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Sweeney/Beard offered Resolution No. 4091, A Resolution Apportioning Assessments Among New Parcels Created As A Result Of The Platting of Minnesota Valley 8th Addition, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business. ), Sweeney/Beard offered Resolution No. 4089, A Resolution Accepting the Public Improvements for Beckrich Park Estates, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Beard offered Resolution No. 4099, A Resolution Amending Resolution 3913 Adopting the 1994 Budget, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Syveeney/Beard offered Resolution No. 4100, A Resolution Appointing Judges of Election, and Establishing Compensation, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Sweeney/Beard offered Resolution No. 4094, A Resolution Receiving a Report And Calling A Hearing On The St. Francis Regional Medical Center Sanitary Sewer Improvements, Project No. 1995-2, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business. ) ' Sweeney/Beard offered Resolution No. 4096, A Resolution Calling A ' Hearing On An Improvement To The Downtown Alleys, Blocks 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 29, 30, And 31, Project No. 1993-9, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Sweeney/Beard offered Resolution No. 497, A Resolution Declaring The Cost To Be Assessed And Ordering The Preparation Of Proposed Assessments . For The 1993 Reconstruction Project No. 1993-7, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Official Proceedings of the October 4, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -12- Sweeney/Beard moved to amend Item 12 in the Downtown Streetscape' s Special Provisions, Project No. 1993-12 to allow paving in calendar year 1994 if conditions warrant, and as determined by the Engineer. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Mayor Laurent adjourned the meeting to Wednesday, October 12, 1994 at 5 : 00 p.m. The meeting adjourned at 9 :10 p.m. u ith S . Cox C ty Clerk Esther TenEyck Recording Secretary OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ.REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA• OCTOBER 12, 1994 Mayor Laurent called the meeting to, order at 5:07 p.m. with Councilmembers Lynch, Beard, and Sweeney present. Also present: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator; Mark Erickson, Assistant City Attorney; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer; Lindberg Ekola; Planning Director; Paul Bilotta, Senior Planner; Gregg Voxland, Finance Director; and Frank Ries, Fire Chief. There being no action to come before the City Council, Mayor Laurent adjourned the meeting to Tuesday, October 18, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. Meeting adjourned at 7:08 p.m. uteacj dith_ S. Cox ' •ity Clerk Recording Secretary Official Proceedings of the October 18, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -3- Beard/Sweeney move to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the Revised and Restated Joint Powers Agreement Establishing the Shakopee Basin Water Management Commission. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Beard/Sweeney move to accept the quotation and authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the Memorandum of Understanding with Peter Patchin &Associates. , Inc. for performing appraisals for right-of-way. for Sarazin Street and Roundhouse Street, Project No. 1994-10._.._ (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Beard/Sweeney move to authorize theappropriateCity officials to execute a contract for consultant services for remedial investigation following underground fuel storage tank removal, not to exceed $20, 000. 00. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Shirley Olson, Executive Director of Murphy's Landing, approached the podium to clarify that the agreement between Murphy's Landing and Paper Warehouse is signed and approved, that there is an amended sublease with the City and Murphy's Landing allowing this. She stated in reference to snow plowing, that Paper Warehouse would pick up all direct cost of utilities during October. Ms. Olson suggested that the City Council discuss the 13 points raised by the City Attorney in her memo of October 12, 1994 relating to the sublease between Murphy's Landing and Paper Warehouse. City issues raised bythe CityAttorneyand made Council discussed the changes. Sweeney/Lynch moved to direct staff to bring a revised Recognition and Non-Disturbance Agreement (between the City and Paper Warehouse) incorporating concerns addressed by the City Council for consideration at the November 1st Council meeting. Motion carried nanimously. Beard/Sweeney move to approve Interfund Transfers: $43, 036. 61 from Capital Equip. Fund to General Fund; and, from the TIF Trust: $20, 000. 00 to 1992B TIF Ref. Debt Service, $100, 000. 00 to Community (\, Center Capital Proj . , $290, 000.00 to Downtown Streetscape, and � $51, 200. 00 to Downtown (Hotel Parking Lot) . (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) .- - -• /Sweeney move to approve bills in the Amount of $792,807. 00. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Beard/Sweeney moved to approve the 1995-99 Capital Improvements Program. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Mr. Voxland, Finance Director, approached the podium. He discussed the financial projections for the Storm Drainage Fund and the Sanitary Sewer Fund. Discussion followed on alternatives for increasing the storm drainage rates. OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL ADJ.REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 18, 1994 Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 7: 00 p.m. with Cncl. Lynch, Beard and Sweeney present. Also present: Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; Mark Erickson, City Attorney; Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer, Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; and Gregg Voxland, Finance Director. Items added to the agenda: 13b) Former City Hall - Lease Agreement Proposal, 13c) Surplus Property. Beard/Lynch moved to approve the agenda as modified. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent recessed for an H.R.A. Meeting at 7: 03 p.m. Mayor Laurent reconvened the City Council Meeting at 7:24 p.m. Liaison reports were given by Councilmembers. Mayor Laurent gave the Mayor's report. Mayor Laurent asked if anyone present in the audience wished to speak on any item not on the agenda. Mr. H.R. Spurrier, 1717 Presidential Lane, Shakopee, Minnesota, approached the podium to address a letter he had received October 15, 1994 from Council Member Sweeney. He requested that the letter and his response to the letter be included in the permanent record of the meeting. Mr. Spurrier stated that he had been corresponding with city staff for several months in an attempt to resolve an ongoing problem regarding the property at 527 Mint Circle. He stated that he and the property owner were willing to meet and discuss what resolutions were needed. Discussion followed. Doug Bell, 1501 East First. Avenue, #15, Shakopee, Minnesota, approached the podium. Mr. Bell asked that he be provided with documents supporting a memo from Ms. Marty and that he wanted public statements made against his reputation to be corrected. Mayor Laurent stated that this subject matter was related to the ongoing litigation betweenMr. Bell and the City and that it could not be discussed at this time. Items added to Consent Business: 11b) Shakopee Basin Water Management Organization Joint Powers Agreement, lld) Fuel Tank Leak, and 11h) 1995-99 Capital Improvement Program. Beard/Sweeney moved to approve the Consent Business as modified. • Motion carried unanimously. Official Proceedings of the October 18, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -2- Beard/Sweeney moved to approve the Minutes of September 20th and 28th, 1994 . (Motion carried under consent business. ) Beard/Sweeney move to receive and file the letter from Harold and Carol Armstrong regarding the realignment of Fuller Street South of 10th Avenue and direct staff to respond. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Beard/Sweeney move to receive and file the letter from John and Joann Tieben, dated 10/3/93, regarding the realignment of Fuller Street South of 10th Avenue. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Beard/Sweeney move to receive and file the petition received 10/11/94 regarding the realignment of Fuller Street (CR-77) and the community center. (Motion carried unanimously. ) Mayor Laurent asked if anyone in the audience would like to speak on item 8d) Resolution No. 4106, A Resolution Supporting The Passage Of The Off-Track Wagering Amendment To The Minnesota Constitution. Stan Bowker, General Manager, Canterbury Downs, and Sheila Evertz, Media Relations Director, of Canterbury Downs approached the podium and stated the importance of off-track betting to the industry as a whole. Sweeney/Lynch offered Resolution No. 4106, A Resolution Supporting The Passage Of The Off-Track Wagering Amendment To The Minnesota Constitution, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Sweeney offer Ordinance No. 388, Fourth Series An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending the Zoning Map to Rezone a 4 . 63 Acre Site Located South of 4tha,` Avenue and Approximately 1, 000 Feet East of Shenandoah Drive from Racetrack District (RTD) to Light Industrial (I-1) and Deleting the Mandatory PUD Requirement and move its adoption. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Beard/Sweeney offer Resolution No. 4105, A resolution Approving the Preliminary and Final Development Plan for the West View 7th Addition Planned Unit Development and move its adoption. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Beard/Sweeney move to 1. Direct staff to proceed with obtaining permission to establish a- school speed zone on Dakota Street adjacent to Pearson Elementary School. 2. Direct staff to perform a stop sign warrant study for the intersection of Dakota Street and Shakopee Avenue. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Official Proceedings of the October 18, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -3- Beard/Sweeney move to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the Revised and Restated Joint Powers Agreement Establishing the Shakopee Basin Water Management Commission. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Beard/Sweeney move to accept the quotation and authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the Memorandum of Understanding with Peter Patchin & Associates. , Inc. for performing appraisals for right-of-way for Sarazin Street and Roundhouse Street, Project No. 1994-10. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Beard/Sweeney move to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute a contract for consultant services for remedial investigation following underground fuel storage tank removal, not to exceed $20, 000. 00. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Shirley Olson, Executive Director of Murphy's Landing, approached the podium to clarify that the agreement between Murphy's Landing and Paper Warehouse is signed and approved, that there is an amended sublease with the City and Murphy's Landing allowing this. She stated in reference to snow plowing, that Paper Warehouse would pick up all direct cost of utilities during October. Ms. Olson suggested that the City Council discuss the 13 points raised by the City Attorney in her memo of October 12, 1994 relating to the sublease between Murphy's Landing and Paper Warehouse. City Council discussed the issues raised by the City Attorney and made changes. Sweeney/Lynch moved to direct staff to bring a revised Recognition and Non-Disturbance Agreement (between the City and Paper Warehouse) incorporating concerns addressed by the City Council for consideration at the November 1st Council meeting. Motion carried ,'unanimously. Beard/Sweeney move to approve Interfund Transfers as listed. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Beard/Sweeney move to approve bills in the Amount of $792,807.00. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Beard/Sweeney moved to approve the 1995-99 Capital Improvements Program. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Mr. Voxiand, Finance Director, approached the podium. He discussed the financial projections for the Storm Drainage Fund and the Sanitary Sewer Fund. Discussion followed on alternatives for increasing the storm drainage rates.# Official Proceedings of the October 18, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -4- Sweeney/Beard move to raise the City-wide storm drainage fee to $6. 00 per quarter for the residential accounts and proportionately increase fees for other accounts. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Voxland was asked to include on a Committee of the Whole agenda, discussion on the use of storm sewer funds within that fund; i.e. : maintenance, new infrastructure, replacement of existing structures. Mr. Voxland discussed the Sanitary Sewer Rates, stating that the projections show dangerously low cash positions for five years. Discussion followed. Mayor Laurent asked if anyone in the audience wished to comment on the Sanitary Sewer Rates. John Alsap, President of Rahr Malting Co. , approached the podium. He stated that Rahr would represent approximately 36% of the dollars and approximately 41% of the flow as opposed to 25% referred to earlier. Mr. Alsap stated that he would like the City to consider a mix of flat rate and flow charge. , Discussion followed. Cncl. Beard stated that he would like to see projected cost scenarios based on flat rates figured at $6. 00, $7 . 00, $8. 00, $9. 00, and $10. 00. Sweeney/Beard moved to table the discussion on the Sanitary Sewer Rate structure until additional information is obtained. Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Sweeney move to authorize the proper City officials to sign the Consent of Drainage and Utility Easement Holder To Sanitary Sewer Easements for the Shakopee/Chaska Interceptor MWCC Project Number 920601, for Parcel Numbers 29 and 31. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Beard/Sweeney move to authorize the proper City officials to release the agreement between the City and Scottland, Inc. dated August 19, 1986 recorded with the County Recorder as Document No. 35276. (Motion Carried under Consent Business. ) Beard/Sweeney offer Resolution No. 4104, A Resolution Declaring Adequacy Of Petition And Ordering The Preparation Of A Report For Vierling Drive, Between County Road 79 And County Road 77 and move its adoption. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Official Proceedings of the October 18, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -5- Beard/Sweeney offer Resolution No. 4107, A Resolution Approving A Premises Permit For The Minnesota Multiple Sclerosis Society, and move its adoption. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Beard/Sweeney offer Resolution No. 4103, A Resolution Calling 1988A GO Improvement Bonds For Redemption and move its adoption. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Beard/Sweeney offer Resolution No. 4108, A Resolution Accepting Public Improvements For Milwaukee Manor 1st Addition, and move its adoption. (Motion carried under Consent Business. ) Mr. Stock suggested a Committee of the Whole meeting date of December 14, 1994, to discuss planning issues with other governmental units. Mayor Laurent stated that Jackson Township and Louisville Township should be invited to attend. Mr. Stock stated that there has been some interest in leasing space at the former City Hall Facility from Mid-American Festivals. He stated that staff is proposing a monthly lease rate of $2,200.00 per month, and recommended that staff be authorized to execute a lease agreement between Mid-American Festivals and the City. Beard/Lynch move to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute a lease agreement by and between Mid-American Festivals and the City of Shakopee for approximately 3,700 square feet of office space at the former city hall building ,for a six month period with the option to rent monthly thereafter effective November 1, 1994 at a rate of $2 ,200. 00 per month with the tenant responsible for all telephone costs and refuse collection. Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Lynch move to declare items listed in the memo from the Chief of Police, dated 10-18-94 (CC DOC //213.) , as surplus property and authorize the City Administrator to s0.1 or otherwise dispose of these items. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent adjourned to October 25, 1994 at 5: 30 p.m. The meeting adjourned at 9 : 10 p.m. JALJ J ith S. Co Cy Clerk Esther TenEyck Recording Secretary MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer PMN SUBJECT: Downtown Alleys Project DATE: November 1, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 4111, a resolution ordering an improvement and the preparation of plans and specifications for the Downtown Alleys Project, Project No. 1993-9. BACKGROUND: On October 4, 1994 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 4096 which sets a public hearing for the Downtown Alleys Project for November 1, 1994. Originally, a public hearing for this project was held on April 20, 1993, at which time the project was ordered. On April 12, 1994 bids were publicly opened, with only one contractor bidding. On April 19th, the City Council rejected the bid due to excessive costs and lack of bidders. Since more than one year has elapsed since the original public hearing without a contract awarded for constructing this project, a second public hearing is required to proceed with the project. This project involves relocating the existing overhead electrical lines to underground duct banks, and reconstructing the alley in the Downtown area (see attached map). At the recommendation of the Community Development Commission and Shakopee Public Utilities Commission(SPUC), Block 21 has been added to the area to be undergrounded. The original scope of the project included Block 21 for alley reconstruction only. The total construction costs for this project are estimated at $771,250.00. This includes $724,000.00 for electrical work and $47,250.00 for alley reconstruction. The cost breakdown is as follows: CITY: Non-Assessed Alley Construction $ 36,000.00 Street Lighting 23,000.00 Underground Duct Bank 299,000.00 Cost Split with SPUC 32,500.00 TOTAL $390,500.00 SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES "Value" to SPUC for Electrical Work $272,000.00 Cost Split with City 32,500.00 TOTAL $304,500.00 ASSESSMENTS Alley Construction $11,250.00 Electrical 65,000.00 TOTAL $76,250.00 The costs as defined above were calculated using the criteria set forth in the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and SPUC, and Resolution No. 5001 which defines a cost sharing process for this project. The estimated costs do not include engineering and administrative costs. When the project is completed, these costs will be proportioned out as specified in the Memorandum of Understanding. The consultant for this project has indicated that additional engineering costs will be needed to complete the project. These costs are addressed as a separate item on the November 1st agenda. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 4111. 2. Deny Resolution No. 4111. 3. Table the decision for more information from staff. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4111, A Resolution Ordering an Improvement and the Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Downtown Alleys; Blocks 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 29, 30, and 31, Project No. 1993-9 and move its adoption. DMN/pmp MEM4111 • • N N N N N N N N N N-4 N I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I Z) til O O O. 0 0 O o O O co O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, # j CO tr 1.14 AA W� N i - O CDD CO CO WV OW) - 01 • 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 O O ' v co — D (A -� D m (n DCA 00 CO CA '-' CO rt C) Co -' C) Co -' C) CD -• O ) - C) CD -' 2 O - N ,-. ? N ^ 7 N < 7' N ? ? C7) C ? N 0. 7 N _ - .? N _. = N _. 7' N — M. W A co k 00C W< CD x WC c° Ocii — 7 00) v x Cc 7 x --1 N~_ oi W Co`< x- O co o x O . x. O o x WCDo x fA v v O N (D O N (D o a r CD 2 0 W 2 -1 o m Sto co 2 CO o I Co cp 2 Co m 2 V) .< cc, D m So o. v, a o) $ Q y Co o m IXQ, m E xi m o P9- ,UP O g m 0 m g cn io Qo Q° n cc) 7 CDC f 2 m o o m o m e . y m 3 cD Cn 3 cc) Cr) O V1 co 3 co - 3 Y C ? co a 3 co 'O O co 'O 7 CA 'O 7 Cl, -o 3 al coCO al CD Cco In co co (A cocmaicm . A. (Tl CD (CTI 7 O C ? co (D co� CD (J) (D CC O CD 01 CO• CD CO CW xi CO CD W CDS CO CD CO CD CO Q cCD p Coo p " -4 C CD X CVD r CVO .. . _- (co coD CVD co o z LTJ cm m w ? Xi y O fn Sn co r fn co r, Co m c, r co r co o g (n to (n co co Z Z c!) co r- 'Co r t--4 fo X j N' A co 70C A x V A- 11)C O A 70C- A. (OD co, 0.1 7tu 0C. A A A" ---f C co O - O 0 W 0 0 O 0 co o 0 - O - O 0 0 v -6- to 1�,, V O V N pe CD -' ¢° CD r C 0 C O CD " CDNa " C C r m CD i Z m co co m j �J 'V O -0 W -0 O. .. X. 7c '0 pp� (fl '0 W " (T - CD• O RI p: F. 67 _ 94 I .0 p: ... N A ? ^ CI CA N Cn - ^ Q ' Z O C 0 A °o° �' rn co rn 03 CO A N A A m t0 D N N COW O 1 ¢0 0 CTI - Z co co O CO 'y O oz Cil P co N o _, 0 0 0 o N �Om N O CNJI co O O CO co CO A W am E1 A E_. Co n ��ya 69 69 69 69 69 69 O (OD V CAo CO 0) 0) O O CO OAD A g - CO (O CD P -' 1 CTI A A CO 0 O co A UI CO CD N CJI W co O Z D OD O co O O CD N N O co A r � CoCD ti 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 N ,—> ,�;J O j N N 69 _ ry_ W co P O P P O A -' V P m v2 N CO N —OCOOCOCV V V OA c) > V* 69 69 69 m 'i N N CO 6469 Eft N A 69 Com) W Co O C C)1 CO C CO CD V o co co G) D N CO CO P CD co 71 co (n V V m r CCD CO io co V V CAD CVD CO .0) -N+ Z • N N N N N . N N N N N N N D . V V V V - V V - V V V V V V `r+, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 m v, O 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` O O O O O O O O O O O . ^j - - ( - ( - CT CTt N (J1 C. (Ti J (TI cn A A A A CD m V a) CT A W Ii Nco V O O co(D 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 _ 1 1 I I I O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O v0 cnN (7 (nN0cn � 'v W V au) i D m .VCOCD � a COA0Cn1 --Icnf �- cl) . cnrnm N) 1.4 y S C.) - ? W ? m- N - CIC) 3. N a t� ^ 3' .3. _ to 7 ? A ? = N CCD 0 7' '' c N V ) a) V N a, A R" w_ CTI p w A Q° CD +' O y 0 3 0 W �. a, A o co A w a, d O C0 ' oo ," w Cm3 0 -oo' * m . 3 o KM 3 (D 1) o (713 0 9) 9" Ko o a) N y a) 0 y a) j CD a) a c Q° m a y o 0 m 0 C) a3) CD .< y CD = n CD o CD 0 cD •- m D m m m a) g m to m ¢1 ccoo R° soca _ w o a) s co o w co s o m < � O e• d o e m o e 0 a 3 ? m M C� m ? cD 0 ? K ? cn on ? m ? (n < m rLi) 3 3 7 7 5. 2 3 < 0) (n 3 • 7 33 v, us (}I _ N (Tt c U1 Z CD tri c 7 n a (A Ca 3 _ (p v1 Ca (0 c.n CTs c cn r_ V CD co gC.) � m m w - (Ay y w v wCD w � w v, CA r V U1 n V CD V V V O liti (D (n CD y CD O a) CD WA O CD W-� CD CD CD CD �.-. (o m • °) o X m 3 kl CnD * Cncor Cnrtorzcn0 z (nCom (ncocoz cncz NCncncozcncoCnCncoZ O ? _ s O o- O So S 3 3 _, 3' R N ID is 0 � x- A CD A- co N . A- co N 7,C x N N PC ) 0 PC 7C'LP O 7c , O 7C A- N 7C_ j� N Na111 ^ CD O' �CD Q° p CD (O 0 N O O .0 N) O N O o N D N O 13 co N m to co CD m V m m r m Cl) o co m CD CD co o tD o o Z cp (n 0 m -00 ° -o Ny v - D D - v c D rn it7 p, W CT1 22--i 0))) n, N Q., a) 7C Cn p: ° ¢: N N a:. W p: A fl: fl: o m . 0 - 0 C b r 0 oro NI rV ci) 0 8 ccn r r () m O N p N m ` r 7C N l2 O N co UVl Z X O Z 0 cn N A al _ r N z R° 0 V o or cn Z 4'... o °) O Z h � m - o o 0 0 P P P P 0 0 9 m N co O coN - co VO coNN co no NW N (n am Cn 69 69 61 49 69 Co 4 r n b N 69 '' -' 69 69 69 EA 69 Cn - W N A co - O N W N N co E O A CO P N co co 9 V 01 V V (T, m n CD O in CT) Co in co A OD A A 00 Z D CO N O co N CTI CT) N W N o) co -j r 1�11�� > Ca cn Lk] ma N 6-9 N 69 6-9 N 69 69 69 69 in in C) r y co CTi N CT, a) -+ -` CA A CA T A r� CD A O) CT1 P O 9' P CD P W co m �l - A N A co co V V co V V V R --, > 0) Cn 69 6_9 699 EA EEA m 0 N E� C.) -� V C71 N C A Ca A A W (n D -' O 01 0 A W N CD 00 CD CD 0, A N P co A P N O Cn P P C,1 m r A V A V CO VW (D V Z N CT CD 0) co , CT1 N co O co (D 0 ., N N N Ni N N N N N N N ZI M V V V V V V V V V V V m C/1 I I I I I I. I I 1 I - I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 yy O coOOW V 0O) UO1 O CO N CD CO 0 1 1 l 1 I 1 1 I I I I O O O O O O O O 0 0 O VO m (n ce to 1 0 L7 u) - m (n -' -1 V) A 77 0) -+ r (n 8 -1 fD .L 1_ cn z w (/) 8 CA O K1 14.4yyy a i O ? N -. D- W'N 7' W'C ? 0 _. - d 7' G) C S . O 7 N C::-...• S W _. N � l`,J± co at y N Q CD ID N p, N .... N C N 0 N , N N .-•. d CJ1 ? p) CA W 00 = W CD K \ V w W 10 a m > o O w o . o o m s o . o PC m . o o * o r r o r 3 oo 2 cn 'o O O 3 Q 'a 10 j vi V v <-o i.y a r, � 'a c 'o �. K w T cD » cT O m o),< m 0 m 10 _om o a m » c m Q° m C K m o 'o igo w 73 C/Z ,..01 � � m < � 17 m D is < m > 5' g ai'.= < 9° —la 7� to o m'rn m _m � o o C o °i c o, N c w m cn c =. cn o v, m cr, m m v, - o CD DO rU_2 cn N N (fin CD N C 0 cOr,_CD = W co cru co cn CD = (n n "0 (n CD Cn CD y Cn CD vyj CO CamoCO CO W .. CO W � -0W CO ,rWCD %,1.1 09 CO V V q V V V V V CD V V V Q C CD CO co CO. CO CO CD CO (D - C) CD O co Z Z. ' aS m " 'y I. cn 03 leo g sCO CO m • :m gcn co mcn w m cn 03 5_,:. cn coo. Coco co z cn co z cn m rcno r �( • . • 0 A O C so AA p O OCOO O QCAN O ONCNC 4 1.� 'C3 N O Qo 13 N O 'O O 'O N O 'p N O 'O N O o 'O O O 'O N 2. 'C N 2. y N co'O A ' +1 CD G) — CD CA CD CD W CD CO CD Ca (D CD C+) CD CACD W CD N O ▪ t7? CD .or+ CD r CD Or CD Z CD pa C m W Z CD r CD A (D t1o1 m p_w CO 1�., 'U O A '0 13 o -0 -0 .J 'U m — -0 co - U Qo X o A f� O N c' f W c; V (u Vm o) O co (j7,, O co T _O co C co CO p: p: X m 1� ;5- D X O Qp N Qo N z N co y w fn co N O W 0r 0 (O m p m Or CO N co co O N 37 {f11'l N 71' (7! O CT C? z O D O co O N O O— 41. CO Q r �} co q. o vz Z O Nz y co N o -.1 O O OZ C O O O o O o o O o 1 (,, om h7 W O coWO COal co A 000 D m , CI) b yg EA 69 69 69 p� i) w N /� V A CT A CO A A A O A • N O CO J 91 A A CO CNO W W CD O N m n in N V CO CD V CO A •V A W Z 9 COiii W O O N N A CO O N -4 r a CD CD ,L41 m > 69 69 H 69 69 69 N V CO r y J .(A7-, CD W .00) .vA, 0N) CO CNO COO A m V V A A A A 0 V A Co A -I a CO CD 69 69 69 69 N) 69 A61 C A • CO O N COD OW N V V co V O co N E P 00 N (71 O (n W (n C)) W m r V V O CO N CA A CD Cn N CD Z CT CA CD 0 A a) N 0 N V 0 • N N N N N N N N N N • N N Z1 her V V V V V - V V V V V -V V � �+1 ` I I I I I I _ I I I I I I o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - f _. J _, _. '. J COril CO CO (VD CoVV C) 01 A W N •O 0 I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I O O O O• O O O O O O O O •s CA m • J D V/ 'J v 7' • =• W � C) .0- N) V/ N i/ V/ =. 0 C V/ 0 C 7' -••• 5 = -a W tv 1.4 vl5. •`_a O co C ? N C S A N S NN • ? N ? CD 3 CD ? CD ID O L ? 0 C_ 0 A CD t a C to A- * . x Co X CO.0 CO o _A- CO.o A- (D.0 x CO o x O = - N o 0 CO V CC'f _ _. 0 o o o o ZD' O •In O. 'e to O o . o o • O o • O o m o O . " o 0) 0 < o A CO CD V .+ V - V V , V V V V V V N 0 V N G) 13 K. O o o = 3 ¢o = O' r4 S o' c) 0_ g' o 2 g CD 2 g' o a fM m y Q° o m O m o ID ? < m o ` o DI �, o m .ca o w m °— ami m o D1 m m m 3 m m 3 O tom D 2 o o m o m o o < °i < °^.' o _KC co COn m N 7 < p z — o z y W •7 u) 0 3. co) '0 (Locoo ca 0 ? N 0 o cO cO fD O cD cD n• ? D fp co y m CW CD O O C < O CD .CT) O NCD cn N o O -0. O N cD O _ CD O CC G UI C fA O W 8. O , c N 7 W O 3 01 .< W .00. W f W 0 w a:, W co 03 W CD V ? w C CO W -, < CVD CDVCD = t00 CVO CVD CVO (VD CVO m O 0 CD m CD CO m CD 0 CD Z �1 a 33 y k/ fn r Cr) co Z cn 07 r (n 03 'd"'fn CO CO CO � Z CO T1 Z CO CO Z CO CO M CO CO * Ch CO * CO CO * O s o z s o o s o o s o ch = V• co V N -- V N 511 -0 N V N 0 V -0 V - -v N 0 -0 N cn O0 N 1 '0 N -• v° N o CD co A N CD •A ^ CD ? Q° m A CD O co O O co A co co O co W co W CD W O 8 co O CD Z CD A CD .Or. co In O CD CD CD ^? CD CD m O 'V x' -0 O) -0 Qe "0 y -0 N co -0 N Cn -o r It O O -o N Ab Q+ N ¢+ N ¢+ A •�• m 'eEr. ,. 07 (n n: 07 •j p: -+ ?: o w r A: r Q: Oo m b A iv. R° O `i f� o 0 0 r co rn C) Po o z r4 ' N ^ � r O � D O m ° m Av, ° m ^ � r W N —a 1 — 0 o go • go 0/ Z y cn O N N O O N N 0 o ry o (0� 0 0 o O O O -1 m O cn (An N - A COC (w71 CD A N •O' N 73 I'l Dm �p9 0) m Ib v, W 69 �' tWa W CWO tropp cV.� CSD vCi O CTI U1 (O W (n N A A W U1 V 9D n O N V -. N V A N Co V OD Z D O Cr) O O O O O UI N CO A O r 6 D c M D N) Eft 60 r 60 69 60 6, ,C,ww y N 1 f .A � 1 J J V/ N N 0 O DD Vo V O A -+ CO rr__ 01 A N V CJ V Co t0 -+ CAV O m vl Oo V 0 CO -•O 0 - W 0 O NV co Z � A � > Cl) CO j9 N �j 40 N q -CO V Qom) V -+ A Off) A A coBV Cin Co n CO COO N+ co CD ,COO W co (Oil O cn O m r co0NCO) (ten co w v - cCDD N cin — v Z -i CO • • N • N N N N N N N N N N Z3 Ry V V V V V V V V V - V V V m �r_J - - I I 1 . I I I I I I I I I to) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y I J J J �► - J - - 1 J? W N O O ` (00 00D 0 .0 co A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o O O O o O o o O o O -4 (nwpCDNK (7Npc 4% 07cnwcDZN3) CDco * en --, -I0 -, 3. U) CaocnNKcnN � N N CO 7 O 0 m y CON _< a CO ,'• -y V Q° = N O 0?) -- N 0 N n N-1 0 N 0 phi N = c. t O m a 0 ... 7 X. i0: 6)OCC41' " G r Z ' o n o t_ o 7C .r N O •en N O I•ll O� O •IT1 2 A 13 0 O P < 03 m p 0 m 17 r 0 13(D n o D LI a (V r I) (lD _, '0 _, r_ CD -o p - M - w •' o m m y m a a) '°o w 1.o p m y p. S. a = D E w SD - y m p 0 v $ < 6 5. toa •7 N7m U, 7- in Ko o $. 9. 'v g f� KS I . m Ky N K < o K < � v 7 (D C ? , (7, Ill > 7 T> 7 c_ ? cA a ? m u, 13 < ? c0 7 p co p (D o m ,41 (1 o m v, y 01 w y ^� (n p co cin m v, cD y U, 7 w g' W cn m cn o at o y CA w CC () p a, cn , 00 CD (ICD ,- (A, m CD -• (n wCD (0 CTI v c, o w w * C O m CO C (n CO "' CO 0 7 CO CO CO X CO m V V • y V m V V '0 V CO V V O V n 0 CO (O W (O CO m c0 Q° < (D (O m (O >v g a) 2 kl 03 r- cnr enrcnmrcococncnmzcncocncD03Z cnr cnrcno _g00om , r4 = 2 ? o 7� o ? Q— O 7- — o- — 7' — 7' — ? o m• 0 7- 7' �T. O) 77C U, X- . X- jC y.. x • X x u1 7C x - . X• O? X- (0 M CD M O N X• x V l O O O O O U, O A O 0 O O O O O '0 07 'O W V 03 '0 N ' "0 N (J.'0 CO 0 V N o v N 0 '0 _W '0 co 'C V Ip -0 N I> 611 o () o o c U, N (D 4!•• (D ? a) P O ? (D co 0) (D A cn O cD ca o A O m O O O CO Z (D 0 cc. (D 8 D 07 Z (D a -0 A- 13 x. -ox• -0 w � r• -0 -0 A � -0A- T1A- 170 8 -0 p+ (N7, Q: (N7, Q: (Nj, w.. ¢: 0 D'1.. o A+ V a+ O 0 A c7 A o o O O O mC, c u_ ° No — in CO b o 0 �' * coxiO a ... O m o Z V 0 Z O c h w o 0 0 0 o o r c k 0 o O O A N . . O pp N4 CCD y `1 O O O O N 0 U, OD O o ? cn Ca am �, 62, N 69 699 n A (CO COCCOCV A N N .. '.. a)j at EA cfl cn /OV w w w (O OD co V O 0 o N CO P w w (O (n OD w V (n .0 w 1 0 O O O O . V N (OO O V W a 0 0 0 0 0 UI UI o 0 0 0 o r a Ca ma Z EA EA EA Eft CD r N N N N (�� N N N O 3 rr__+ N3 P a) O al 9)) w O O) 9 N A• m v, in 0 O) O N CA O co O) 0 . N OD Oo co co O V 0 0 OD co V a a CD 69 69 EA El, 69 69 m -I co 69 69 69 69 f 69 69 UI 0 UI V CO0co 0 . OD CO co A W 2 a (O (D (O (D P co V oD -� O) (n m r (7) Z 00D cooco0W O N (Nn O 000 000 -+ V ,.,,I N N N N N N N N N N N ]1 • V V V V V V V - V V V V m `r_, . I I I I - I I I I I I , O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `, O O $ O O O O 0 O O SI `fY '`"�. W W CN.) CN.) _. W -- W W CD CD CO CD Q 0 co CO CJI A w N O co co V. CA , Ii I I I I I I I I I I I O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 v0 cn00cA0 C.) cmoDDemo _Dccn -80CD -LOCOG30cnwzcnCa N) 0 C 0 tly y o m` Al M g m c 3 2 m °.3 .....m 0 .... 0 ,con o o N o o m c: c •m 3 c m m c m 'w_ a L • 0. a) w fp m -i o fn w fa o chi y o N a 0 2 CO 0 = tom » n'am " 7 30 ^ (n � 00, a m o fn c to c pp 0) c coo ? coo ? m R° m D m Co m oxi ym > O o y o 0 3 3 Dt� DRe D Dpi Pa) =. ? < n o c Cho c n o o vmi v° y v° °= m T. � � � m `�1y 7 o m O c x o c x O c X. m m 7 ? O A) 7 7 m `�+ N m c- � c com co 00 CD � � m � Nm � cm CD gym cv'nm CA = w m o o o al w w w a, w m w w . CD CD -L." . K j `G CO CD cD 0 CD K CD CO o 0 0 • 7 m P) 0 37 z z z co 4 cn0 zrcI) m tn0 tnAz tno cntnoortnCCI r CD r- tnr tnr u) r- O ? ? O? ? ..., ? O 0 ? 0 7- 0 ? 0 ? 0 ; aa) r m y w al r -- al co r w 5i a1 cS a1 w a1 al rc mo - A- -w c, 7< O N 7C O co A- O �? X -m Cfl m x A A- -• 7C c0 woo A- --.1 . O •t " 0 33 w 0 o C o _ o O O 0 O O O V N CT R0 V O 0 CD O O r o V V O '0 N •O N ,r V W a W d W m 1 m m m 0 co m CO co c0 m m m m m co -m• N m Q I m k ^ m V r m w 0 m D m m co g m g m 0 O cn a;) N R° I- Ps N Ro O O in co r co wm D Qo z c0 � 33 33 � � O r N Q cm0 O co m O m Z o A o w m oo Oy O Z P r .a r O O O (��� t0 N .r U1 CD c0 w -. at al O O O V O O Dm Cr) m 'ZJ o V p 0 69 SS /00 CO to CD CO CO P pa 0oT � wl'.3 o wo o w ww m n CA V co V o O O O O O z D 0 co V V w o 0 0 0 O o r D y b9 69 Efl 69 (fl d! 69 N N N N r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a) rn rn a) m vj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oZ 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0o co co co _1 > Co Jto 69 69 v► fo M O -• J 69 di 69 -. CD V 03 -. -. - Cl) D J al cn OD p N P ca O O •ccD co co coNm r O cco V V W O 0 OD COBO OD _1 N N N N N NN N N N N r by V V V V V V V V V V V m a 1 I I I I I I I I I I O 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 yaN a .. a a a a — vy N N N 1 N N N N N N N • A A A A A AA A A co CJ 0 _ 00 V C) to I A W N -a 0 CO W 1'c�l I I O O I I 0 0 I 0 I I i.► '9) — C) cnca 'T'Icn --.m '0-.P --4 CO .'nnCO1C) CO ^•..* cn -' "0COOnCO T. cnyN0 N y O cn a) = 0) ? N a7 '.7' . = N = S N —• 7' c0 -. 7' N 0 7' Ln w = -• co S N so O) c N - N O Id a7 cO„Z. cd .O".m :N c0.< O, -CO.`<' a1`'N = 0 C a7 Q1 < 137 W 7 a7 0 C.) < ;O b 7 V O >r c >r 7' °w �N �c' {n o A coo . a' Dr A' � • � m 7 Ac- co o: I r. Fl; n f)-0o d 0 � -0 m • a V V v0 m 3 v0 (n 12° v0 7 °o m V o • PO 7 m w 0 D a 0 w o o CD o s C o co a m = o p o m a p c, o . y• w = nw D n ° 0 mo a) o 5 � w o oa) m -o n cp 3 7 7' - 7 < cD a1 w C: 7 N '0 7 V7 0 D 7 cd a 0 y y 7 O) 7 u 7 m N O = v7 w r •u7 3 0 co O 0. a cn• cn co al m cn 3 '< cCD 01 i7 7 6 cn 3 CTI c (o vI • o < 01 3) co 01 o fie j CO ?; 01.cp top cn p co to = cn m a7 cn o cn CD O � � m CD 0. CO _ 0 a 3- CO � CO COo o 0 o w CD cVn `-� '< CO CO m co” 0 CO m CD 0 * 7 M CD c� y cn CO w to cn < r cn r co r cn co < r En r cn co Eo cn co r C rN Oo cn co 0 0 a. 7' - - 7' D) O 7' 0 0. 0 0-,- D) -O 7' 0 7•..— .7- — 0 7' O 7' — 7' — - , x`O< O 7wc. at 0 70c- N . a y A N . O 7C A -W fk n• O O^ DI �1 O DI 1 O ca) 0 0 0 CD 0 0) 0 0 0 0 O ( n `< 1�, CD '� C N o (n 0 - 0 -c 0 „ CD o Q° a) O 0 m O Z a - 0 O m j i J o O O O Q° cD g 0 $ 0 Ro CD V m » 0 oD cD g O m O oo o. - O 'D 3 co -0 x "0 x -0. W .a -D 0 -0 -0 Pr " O '0 8 a7 0 •_ � wooco n o a Z w co c o ' -• Mim 0 O Q° op� N t0 N 0 cn N Z Re a co 0 n 0 ¢° O m GN° 0 r y rnZ o m ; Oy N 0 C ,._ o co rhy O W . W N O -a . O O -1 m ` V co O O O O N o O 0 *"••1 ^I D m En m 7b Cz 14 42, J CO O 69 69 i� 69Eh 61 gy=p• W W V au CO 0 0 ,c0ii1 ,"i /� O N V V o o O co croo N a) Z D w co C) rn o o � co 0 cn rn ,-� r D h7 CO r co r y 69 Eh 69 69 69 69 EA 69 69 En 69 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 P P P o m Vj o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a > WW 6AW9 En OOD A A A J 0) O O O CA V (.4 0 m coOOND CV) co) o o co cco o ccnn C) • I I I I I I R1 0 0 0 0 •_ y 1 to CD CO 0 0 NI NI N) rn 1 W 0 0— N � COO CAO •O 0 1 I I I I I I I �1 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 v0 146' 1.9 tnN) NC� CO -aC� cn0 0 (71g _N2 0) �j . w (O < w �K wtoCZ w �. wCA 0 No 000 b C • O p • O 0 U) O p Cn O 0 !A O.• W N O m fi o m o o CO o omWwP mWm CD 5 = s m 0 W 11 024' 770 (el 7. m o Em o Em o Km mK �,± - sag3 2 N 'O 3 co 'O p 0 'O ? CA j ? (A j (A m 2 3 N m co CD m 0 a s (/1 CTI - m CTI m CTI - O CT CO CD CTI CO-- (D N O O CA r�, Cri• V m v W V v m OC11 v O O.O V cp 0 - CO CO CO CO 3 CO O N CO a) Z Z z O a CDoRpCOWCCpOCOCOCO 33 -4 37 -i 13 -1 CD r- 'CD- r0NrCO WZ rt 07 C A A C A A C C wOw 0) OO wD CI x777C77C7CI) ACr) nCAA co O qk * qt O 0 O O Q° O X I 71 W W N N N N N Na -' ) i CO •-• a v v CO 'O r 'Cco z + o ' OOC1 A W N —' W W C.) CD W 1 (D CD .9. -0 CD ' N(T' CO (T' p mmmmmmmm -0 6 ' 2 � � � � � � � � Fii sr) Wwnm b - j »� � rb 000000000 n 0nynaas. ag. 0) 7) 0 mmmmmmmm -. m V 3 X C .Or. .Or. r .Or. .Or. ^ C 10 SC Z C A A p g A q A O m 7 0 m N r coA Z 49 (� 69 �y9 bl499 � H0 C N AA(� 1 A CO -' —' 0n SiC N) CO OAiV AO W TCO OCO P P N fOm V0 (0iOO O co23 hl O) 00000t0 + C.) O O -V am o, r M C) pO i! A cocA . A W CO xi O pOco A CO A C.) A ,p m n O OO) O O OV) 0)VOV) . _4 ra' a CD - mrr- cn y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m wl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a .Zi So Cl) 69 N 69 EA 49 61 Ci, 0 cin jD v Coo Aw C.) C.) O O A P A A m 0 OO) O 0 QV) T OV) A RESOLUTION NO. 4111 A Resolution Ordering An Improvement And The Preparation Of Plans And Specifications For The Downtown Alleys; Blocks 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 29, 30 And 31 Project No. 1993-9 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 4096, adopted on October 4, 1994, fixed a date for Council hearing on the proposed improvement of the downtown alleys by electrical undergrounding and alley reconstruction; and WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held on the 1st day of November, 1994, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. That the improvement is ordered as hereinafter described: Electrical undergrounding and alley reconstruction on Blocks 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 29, 30 and 31 of the Original Shakopee Plat. 2. Bret Weiss, Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Assoc., Inc. is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement, and shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney w I's-1 Clittill ) _ w W -co'M08'13St2121VH w., w r (� ` , O &Qt0 0-tram w •jr, -�� CC) tio s•-••1 q i' 3 m t00 W �� a3)f3a3� ...I ny o-osetoo o and J3AOIN 0 q0 -� ;o I Q 0-199 100 .-' w Cg N r a.1ouziij3 w w - � � ` q> in D W q q I' � 1 w - IJoilit-1 i 02 4n t I. 0-9Z01.00' I ,NI Mid O I *& I O_90bt„° II o 0 - Nix 612121014 0 0 AM (5 - .�aauads Esi 44 r , � � j� „,.� .,a1 ♦A.Z\L.A 1 .1.,,,.. �; 1.0 wW _ �,,i v, t':,. 41 I 1 i'i'i I \��``` �' � Alin F " o ~ iiiii) 1 \ •r 1• r 7,k, iiumso . ---lee MO AMID • 110011 , , - N ' 7,717•"•••- 4"..."•'7474 r i r7 1411 , • • �. --.1 6111 0000 ••••t•O1•,•••0.•.•:1•••1•••0 •• •8 ` AaMOrtvn -- "� \ i iiiiii -rte iii '''''\li111 „iiim _ POO 0-110t00 ��\lt, i`• 1111••••• e,.1111•,0011 0 ■ n • : �� \ `,ti'L iiiw�i rs•r r•w L r'7 _ 1 1 • " • .1. \�, 1 12••z•••1 i8� [ -asotoo ,ham \ 11.11•••• •••0•r••• in r_� 1-� K\\ •••c 1•••x•••1 Jim mai Alla t-011111,�� lla 4 float ? WF � •••••••• •••.1�i•"'•••• �/� *KM a� :a. �,♦s 11••••••"1*11♦ •••Ln�R'+ • o-11►Ot ��\`�� 1. i y i s^( � 11l 1 '� Oft '�'a`a�`a.:1.4 `` i 1•••61.•e J w „ \`�` 1110•• 0011►111111••►ff 1� �:=Y�.tY �! !11�, ���,\ i•••Vi••1•11•,1^0'...'.^J1 14 ^V I •I.•) ] ��-�. `•t \ I•••••••tu •0 ,0.11 ,.....„, - \\ I _ fri14 . 1tt FllWifAMV i••t.47 1- CC `ij A .N.•�4......1,:....% \,` j: w$i� A\\\\� %• �•• ntnn,0TTn, a►+owdlo•d 114 �� !'� rr.r >ua. ar �'• € \ i• \II 1 NN. - . ' '.u�EJ�.111111,�acuus� .1,114VNI.lell C.) wry ,� ♦ ate.\;..♦ •rrrrrrr►•r.rrrrr w w L , _ , - r , , _ 1.T0 1 1� — r — — — — . — . — On i)JI .. 1 \ '%`a'.:..,...\11 Nil:, to 0-NZIOOt Loa. 1/40 EA Er4 E....4 �,7o-o°cot� �iL 1\ `� aavis30 -ssii� N A CA Q tONN00,0 ���� ;,`\A. \ 0-8SZt00_ResONUN3IN to o-691111111 ���� I wt� o tisZtoo 0 0 0 o-esoio0 \\\\ \�\\ o-o o 0-£si"� 114 �: N N poo. �T Ip �' �' _s .; 111 all arztoo rtJ g i 03 14 SI �a O rn CI) .` 11 R Ig 0 x I,IOIZVZS rn s',.....—.'"CD. ~ MU 0 U • ,� I CO •t N. N. N. CO CO r N CO W N. O N N CO CO O 0 0 N J g 00) ((0 ._ O6_ N. N N N coO (MO i... H N N .- - 1n (O r69 OW 69 49 E9 N9 6,,-; 49 U) tQ co W O N N. co0 (00 O O O N CO N. ..- ,_ O (L) (D O O O CM [� co O N. N N N. co CO - 69 CA to b9 69 Jfe 69 W ¢ W CO COQ w J ~ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11►' ..:C Z O 0 O O O O O O O O O O W o O O O O O O O O O O QO (n 0 69 69 69 69 0 0 O O O Oto W (W (A 9 (9 d E9 E9 (9 J U W Q Cr co c n d' M O O n N O N. W W 0 CV O O O C r r O cj 6 d '� zo OM i0 �, M pr cWno J 1 N - U a- aS N f1) 0 7 e - 36 N coO CV io N NY OO UU CO Z M J Uco MW r OmA J w m U W co OODON E D O � Z0 � 0 0 be, � �M CCy N CO Lir 0 22 MlC :cif L7OC0 0_ D- D_ O W0.m 0. 0. Y D. a. OD. a. O 0. ,}OWOC) ZmWJCD comNO OJNr Jm .I rcoX p ( r m O C) s r N N d O Z 1.... r g 0N 7:3 � N o 0 0 ppaa o N O - a O. 0- O. Oo. W OYOLOMO 6J0 ^OC p L C+) L fllN CC CU Os. 'ISNUIT/ w OM d coCJ o0ZZU ) DUOUJU) JU) WUJ n UJ ET) min Q C) LU m W Zo rn o) a) 0) o) � 0) Y 0) o) _ N. N. N. N. l•-• n m N. n � N rn r^ O M N M C) CO m Cl m M CC M Y 7 C')Lr) N M r N. n rrv��J,,, 0 `) 0 ` ,LP, `O 0 •`O Ln 0. m •0C C) N C Cl) O y N to y C) N +, D. d Cn U) m co O c > (n CO C C LO W CO o g o ami o CNi o m o Ea) C c� C L 3 a) c C Q U > c > c O o o 5e E � E � E2 cm o2D: o2 0 E2 •C) m e6 ¢ 2o6 ¢ 2 1 0- U Q m U) Z a cn = ai 0 2 ami co I it cd u. g)_ `° aa) c 2 0 3 z o m N °) m N °) a a a a _ a a CD o c o _ 3 a C) a q a r U *6 � •R "6A Y o U Y o U Y >, � -Y r„ 0, C U Y c r m CO - m > x w V L • N L N = Y N L N t R GO co N. C O > r 0) CO C .. CO C CV CO L L N L > N C N L T L C \ 0: U) U r U) U U) U U) U U) co U) c5 r U) Cr) C0 CO Q (n W Q r CT) Q U) k 7. 41 A 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I hl I I I i i O u)ffiq 14 Ci COCO N.co COco CJ)cl ONr r N M In NI- / r r r r r r r r a: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 CC N. r-- N. n n N. N. N. N. N. n NCV N N N NCV N N N N 4 N. U) co^ co^ O n coO .,- N J 2 v CMD CMO � CMC Ili C O vi co O) Q 0 O O O O O O N Cr0 O N to N I— 4 W b9 to ER- fA 69 t9 V) to 69 Q Cl) U) O^0 C^0 U) COO ..-- N v▪ , 01 C• MD CMO C U O O U) CD d' 0) J CI) 69 69 69 69 t9 NKA CO rff369. CNI Ntfl NE9 Q W W N Q ul J FO O O O O O O O O O O Q Z 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O U W o 0 d 0 d 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q: Cn o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O J CO W Q N c0 co N 00 N. M r O O (0 N CC Cl) N N N N N O O ti N O co M LI-1 m O 0 C O O C C G O O r C J Z• O O to d' Z N J b N.: O �_ os Q �_ In ca- ca N O N Z�X CO Z - CA N O O Oz cm A J 0 J J O J ts W J n N o Y J U O O _ _ 0) _ O _ p 06 N U O p 0 ��// 21 N ! O _R _A O N NO N ` N O N N CD Y ct co m C6 N iC (O c0 Zn 0] c0 ^V CD 0. O. o a 0. r 0. r 0_ 3 a y 0. W a Y a M a N- 0 0. O N d Z N d "J N co J N co N d W N y J CO N w -j m N O n 0 O co m co r m O N Oa O N C O N Oa p o O N o O N o O O N o 0 p) o co Oco o m n N n. O J 0. N _V co _Y8 co O V to 0 co O YU co O Y co N -- U cC -- co N ~ N N O n) O 0 M O N M O L O t N O L M L [t O L N _O L r r O L r W .c CV p .c p .c O _ L = L NO Z 0] co Cn m co Z 0] Cn co co Z 0] co Z 0] co co W 0] co Z O co Z J Cn J co J 0] co . Q co 64 C m C W Y o 0) Z In o c c 0 c � • n d co j- It n 0 M °) J _ Cn .0 N- .0 co U J Co n C, n M cc) M co ) M In co O m m u� m In In IC to coCn y m u7 ct m m ,n v m ,Mn to ,Mn rw C • In C to — N - > O C _ c `m O C i C O In m Z U 7 In RI — CO CO - O rT, w p to c c o c CB 0 c O =y • V� c d U C c o .p d '5 T. d J t° d 'V a ~ = t) Q2 u) ° 20 me m = 2m c m � Q2 > cr = � Q � /- � i2 earl O m -> a o 2 :° o > tits m •c co cu a'f a CD 0 c a g W o oO. m In CD O C = C W Oa , U n' Q r o. - m ¢ID CD r o. m 2 o m 2 0 A 1- = OCO L - OL a) N113 tL � LLN CO = y � 13 „x .;i• Oco •� � Nrt °n° R N � CC W \ W CD CO LL Cn r co F- .- co U v- 00 Q co co co W 0_ r U) Q N- 03 r Cr) U N Cr) U N Cn • 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O Q I I I I I I I I I I I 1 CD !� co a) O N M to co I� W .�- .In In In In to to 1� r^ - _ _ r r r r r 64 •�/ 0. O O O 3 O O O 3 O O 5 5 rw O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O ` I 1.1.1 I I I I t I I I 1 I I I 41 CC N- n N- N. N- N- n N- N- N. n I. N N CV N N CV N N N N CV CV a 4 N. Z O N (00 Off) coom .-- C') o J W •r CA CA r (O tri 6 C') N:tri a .. CO O) N co N nr co r O) NI- I„- n N. o O 69 .. 0. S .-- S• r (n r r r r r r W69 69 E9 C9 E9 H9 r r E9 69 C9 b9 U) a Z Cb orEi Tr n N. d' CO O) M r N. 'a• N.o CC W • r O) O) r (C lig CO of N: tri 11 J (U) n N 69 4N9 69 r 49 r 64 •�- Q U) 69 69 u9 (fl b9 W kittl 0) U) a J¢ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o O W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci 0 ct ccn 0 0 0 069 0 0 0 0 0 0 �1/ (n r r r r r r r r r W (W b9 G9 fH (9 69 fA (9 f9 fA E9 LAI w < a \ co co v M (O CO o co 0 co v H`C cC m CO 0 r co to N M O CO N w O M r O O O C O O O C O • J a6. D U- Z 01.0 b Co iv co yNo '5 n r n r _ _ J 0 m O O N O N O a �_ O Z CO tO CO to Y N 0 W N O O co io N m O W 8 r 4 J U ' M (n N _ Z _ NN M U) O N J (� W O 0 o Y ° n N 75 (1.1 m o co n o (o coO Io� 8aua , -n. FoCo 8 a 0 Wr ao an a oa O . v o a J J r4 M c0 m In a .y. CD CD Z C9 J ,d a) ZCD tD J a) J m (O "�1 N co co M d M O M m co M m M N M C 9 M N . ‘;1' O. N O. p N p NQp O O 0 CO N Q p N O. p N a. O O. p Na cd l0 M ONw r O Y O - O Y O O -vC O Y O Y O ` Y Y Y N 4 Y Y a ca J N h OU co .� O co R O ° J CO CM) -J O CO N O O 8 CO r CO N 8 Co " W 8 Co 0 O (n J m co Z m (n Z m co (n O co co O m co W co (n W m (n 5 co W m co as m (n NQN W c C r" z d c > ro "V t > yNy _ ` N N N n • m M Y M co n- i co M M co co a) M M m 11) i N ti) N In O = O m 14) a) N — It) 7 an lA co In W W} to a) N In a) to n- V O '` a) O m In CD In 'C a) In 0 C IC) to U M a Zvi c in c u) aa) C C cn c > c o m c c > c ac) c o E N 0. Y � 2 a) ca N2C7 a�i2Qg � � 2 c) a2Q2 '� t2 � mQ2 2 c COC. fa •- aaJ anJ a °t3 J am -- a `cJ a I-c .- am4- a. .5 ao c � 2,3 u. 70 .. A O (n y co Y -1 Y -- a Y a) W Y > (n Y 2 W Y a) w . u- Q) Y o ¢ W Y N C O) O = CD co `- CO O . O co t N co i N co �9 In ca ... N as N co a) O N Co to M W N .0 C') -C N N .0 O -C 7 M L Co .0 o ' 7 C'M .0 l0 t[) .0 N. 4‘1 .0 O r 17 U r (n s• .- (n m r 0 .- (n I- r (n J r (n C_ 'a (n I- r (n W r (n 0 O r CO -) to W •9C 0 0 o O o o O O o 0 0 `.-1 O I I I I e1� I I I I I I '�J`-YI ',. 0 Ion U) (ND CMO (O CSO COO CCO CO Cco OO N C W J r r r r r r r r ,-- E--.1 [� v/ 0. O OO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO O0 "J I I I I I I I I 1 I I 4.1 Cr N. n n n n n n n n n N. N N N N N N N N N N N 4 • Z coo cocN. 0 A Cr, o ii; co o ccoo CDD W • N- u) O) c0 h ch h CV CG Q y O .T- -a- O N. O N. co In O N 0 �, Cl) a Zti n O v r N. r a) o n co co w o co co ao o co 0 0 o co C � W C t!) .1. c= CN. O N.: c+i N: c..1CC C� " b09 O_ 69• Co co O N J• W b9 69 to E9 i,-; to 69 �W CO 'moi a Q Z o 0 o O O o 0 o O O o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o O U W o d 0 0 0 d d 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 049 49 69 64 49 0 0 0 l J W Q �} co co .�} C/) N (D M (0 (0 CA N d� N O w W O 0 C C C O O O C N O O a mu. u. a Z O Q N N In 0 N N 0 C_I N OZ O 0. J Q W TX *SOJ c�TN W O N N COZ @O rn N NJ 0 Y N 0 06 A J UiN tc- 0 cI. 8 _ co - n0 N _ im ` i .- iN cco cN T 3 Nco co N cN% N CL Q W M N -. M a - c27 d 0 cn CID) J er 0 0 0 0 - 0 a) J d N 0 .r N Z�x m N Tr d d 144 O N O. r N Cl r N 0.- N 0. `O N 0.- - O. `O - 0. N fl. N 0. W N 0. N Cl Co O. `1 U O I O I O to O O to r O T O O U uj x Bo -Ne O O X 0 0 r- 0 O "� N O L _8 L _O L N O = N O co Com') Wx = N , co 1A _O ca la L p `' co 0 L p 0 co •r O •t p L O > C] co m co 3 m co W m CO Z E co Z W CO Z W co co m co J m co J Co co Z Co co J co C4 C N CC �JJ Y m w Z Y y d O) O T `O O CU C)) O) C)) O) 0) co L CD CO CA Q N ^ m E nn n N. O E ^ N. ... c9 p) 0 co L n i M — co 0 co O co 0 co d co co C 0J to ot) C I!. J > Y 7 c� CD in_ CD m m N 0) CD m > C in O N C`�') W W y 2 C C ¢ C .` d C O Cd d 0. u) C Cl O C co d d C tD CD 03 O. U) C () .rz C 0 Q C d (n co O cmc Er- 2 � < . as < .. e x E � -2 -6 ai cv E � x E � .x73 ai E � -, a) � 2L_ � 0_ L_ c 0. 0 co G O W N uZS T 0 W T 0 co = 0 co = 0 C� = m coV = 0 co = N5 ai go -L. - 0 CU = 0 0 ai 0 N O • O a _ a a a _ a a a •' O m U Y r Y 7 W y C W Y 0 co• y 0 UJ y 0 Cn y 0 CO Y D Y d o) Y r0. Y N A w2 c" L a s L >� 0 L . 0 L '' cN t '' 0) L '' N L N L "' N L Io - L S' N L 7 0) 0 C \ CO r co Y r co > T co C3 r Cr) U T co CU T Cn U r co U T co U r co O r co Q r co W co -) lel O O 0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 O O ` D I I I I I' I I I I I I ISGI N M - N- co f- co CA O N U.IQ I� .^-- N. N. N. n n .^- n CO CD CO 6.4 CJ) T r r r- T r r T vJ /� T T 'c; r r r T T T T T �- " O O O O O O O O O O O O rw O O O O O O O O O O O c7 ` I 11.1 I I I I I I I I I I I I N. N. N N. N- N. N N. N- N. N N N N N N N N N N N N I- N. T CD CO 0 0 n 0 M CO CO 00 Z N d' CO CO CO O CD N 0 CD cD CO Q 2 O N N cc; eO cc; 0) CO ci N co N �,, �(/n� N N O O O O CD N N N 0 V) r r T T T T T T T r T CO 69 69 69 69 f9 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 CO Q n r O CO 0 O N. 0 C+) Co CO O VIE. r N V CO CD O 0 CD N 0 CO CO CO r-c W co - N CO N N cS 3 69 co LA 6699 COD cli N CO N N Q co 63 to W 69 69 69 69 49 69 Q J - O O O O O O O O O O O O Q Z o O O O O O O Oa O O O U W G O C O O O O O O O G O O O 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O Q _cc (n O O O O O O O O O O O O ,„,IX � r69 CrA 69r T T CTH 63T CTfl Cr 6r 67CT WCW W Q CC 0)LIJIl) 0 0 T CM 0 O O 0 �T, 0 0 0 � co O O O r T O O O O Ch T T T Z• O 3 0 n O w O W O J o 0 J C -C,) O O Q 0._ p J 0 W g Co o `o A J U W c N J O 0 �/ W O 4-, '- U _N N tti 01' t6 - - .-- *cis 0) t0 O _N E. N to N — N clT "�I C) CL Or O O_ Y O. Y CL O. 14 CL Cn O. J O. M n. Y O. Y O. Y O_ O .4- co m Z m m o a) 0 m J a) Z m O N O a) °� m a) a) a) (* m a) a) m a CD a) v m - v CD N O 0 a) a) a) "�1 N a 06 r` a CO a CO a p Na p N O. O CM 0. U) NC1 . N a CO a co a 5 a N _O cb r J c0 O t1! CA O (08 ,4 - 0 ,40g ,00) 8 (4 ,48 ,41• 0 N _ _ _ YO CYO c° 1 L L p L p L L t L L O L p L p L p L O W mCn > OCoJCo .J CD ZO] CncnmcoZCOCoCnmcoJCOCnJCI) JCI) -3 CD m W W ZCD ami ma) o rn rn .2 ,� CD m rn m Cn m o) rn rrte�,,, • w � Y N. mCD c jC') co N. � � m CD C') N. "J m N 0 m to O m O C .- 0 a) I[) J m Il) 0 0 C • If) a) y r _ to 0 to rw CC ON C cn CL C Cn N� In .Ca Cn C In ; N lA ` m til m co m N� L to H N LC) m C t[) W w O a) C m s= c co C > In m C Q Cn c . co C a c C Cn In U W .` C O m C/a 0. m > O > > '„ 2 _ . I o205 .-9 ami m � 2 to_ .c � � cQNm Ram '� r a D_ r a m -� a C7 m a m J m Y ?� m E m `a iii >O N ?� In m cn rn m Q, CL c W Y p •W Y 7.a) •Cn Y ^ h a) ,' O C) O C 0 J O �i - ed Y C : O 76 r a W °. O C•c)) t 0 el L L N L V ON L 1- L cc O c•3 .0 O c) 0 ° N .0 03 pD 13 0 co L m .0 O C') .0 C \ -) N Cn M N Cn U CO V) CC r U F- T- CO CO CO CC N Z CO r Cn CO W C) N U 2 N Cn 0 M Cn CSC • T 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I _ M IA CO aO 0) O N c') 0) C!) 1 y C] p0 aO CO CO CO p0 CA ON CA (7) a) r r r r r T r r r r T r O. O TO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO OOrw, i i I I I I I I I I I I N N N N N N N N N N N N • 0 co o co 0 0 0 0 o 0 o CO CD CO CO 0 O O o O o 0 aW Co to cc co 06 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N 69 69 EA 0 69 0 O O W (9 E9 6 9 47) E9 69 6 9 2 Q co O CO co 0 0 0 o O O O co Co CO co 0 0 0 O o 0 0 W CCi Ct7 CC7 co O O O O O d O 0, N N N N 69 69 69 69 69 t9 f9 J Cn Ff?• W f9 69 E9 CO rai Q o 0 0 o O o 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o U W co 0 0 0 0 0• 0 0 0 0 0 NQ 0 0 0 069 69 69 o69 0 0 n W LUU 6 t9 i9 A H A f9 J < W Q 1.4 ,� m• O0 0 co O O O O .�- CND N Wr r r r O O O r r O a Z O _ Z `t W - o .... 0 _O W ° N J O W J O b Q D_ N co• N CO� V O W O CC O A WU Q CZ N Y O3 Q — Ln6 J CO _ _ In O J to n 04 0 N Y. N Ca N _R Y cp 0 ca Z ca (0 U CO O m• _N n _ c3 0) V t6 C x t,1 c6 644 --.8 .0 D. YC� CL. YU CL U LI O d O 5 m0 0. J n O. d 5 O d J LU O a Q OCD O O O) N 0) co m Jtb J N r m m a m a m aCD co 0 a J N . N a ° n a ° J a 0 0) 0. 0 a °eS Ln N a n le co he co . O d' Y x In Y O Y O 5 Y N O Y n D: o ,- >. Y OJ ca CO r 4.J ca C>� •X CO CO O J CO J co J CO J CO J m co J m co co O co Z• co Cn �i O co W Cn J Z O Cl) Q1=/ Z Z O 2 O O O O LU Y T W Z O w * a * co O 0) 0) CD U 0) 0) 0) T ,- ar ar 0) cz 0) n n m n n n n ro m ca n = n co co C/l a) 'n min c mini ° ° a din mlin Amo 3: ZS 3: ZS � � � a) In In ° In o In '� ° In d In m n d m m ° i) fa n Ln W W 6 m c d C c Y C c L C c a 0 c o. j c O U ° in O U ° CO O U ° > c .V m e O ca CD fn _ _ ad _ ro ca y �. " �. v ° to �, a D-WI cc 1 In a ti a ° to' a U N a co 2 a c� Z a to co . 2 rn N O y ca o F- _ a .5 c, a YOmYYm YEU1Y .0 • YO Yo mJY > —. YiIL UJ . UJ fn UV im2o m C A . C) ONNCO ClOcoC) 0 Cr0 o c, .0 toO Cj L 0 L O CO 0 CO N CO N L ) " C COCC V) = nO W ^ C] oCn -7co co Z CO n O CO CO U r CO U r n D Q a W D Q Co W D Q C0 W CC n 0 C CC�� Z. + O O O O O O O O O O o O I I I I I I I I I I I co n O co N CI d in co co O CA CA co 0) Co co co co Co co co Co r r r r N N N N N N N r r r r r r r r r r D. O O O O O O O O O O V) O O O O O O O O O O co _JLij I I I I I I I I I I I n n n n n n n n n n n N N N N N N N N N N L.T. N I- o 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 0 Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W •J O O O O O O O O O O Q 0 O 69 49 O0 0 o O o oo 69 0 W 49 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 Ci) Co Q O 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O W o 0 0 06 0 06 0 0 0 d9 d9 69 to b9 69 69 69 fA 69 69 E"..4 J CCW W.� QW COCOQ al _.) O 0 O O O O O O O O O Q Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 Q y 0 0 0 0 049 69 0 0 0 49 WW v9 v9 6iT9 d9 d9 W Q N 0) O M N 0 O O O O T UI U) N. N0 N O O 0 O O n W m O 0 O T T C CV M T T ri O J a.15 zo O N E".I T O Z T M E- O_ aD '' O Y J h. N W O y Q C. Z N N O 01 N_ .6 O O W O O O co r 0 m CO A J U h O p J J Y Z >. >. In Cn p >. M °6 li ��// W J _m YUU N O is ?) l0 o _N M A m _I 0 T _0 C j N Cry is W co m J 0) is "�I O IQ O 0. 0 Y 0. T 0. 0. T m a. Y D. Y Y. m ' a. C c a, O r m m m W m m co m J O N- CD Qa m 8 a) a) °� a) 21.0 - a) r' a) O N m Z 0 m _ 0 m CD CA p N m a) u) a) (V 7 T a) "V >. V 0 O CL O M O CO 0. 0 0. °a tM,,) O O co O CD O 00 - MUU 0 m 0 m 0 M 0 2 a T CE ,, 0 W > L L O L O o t O t O co o 0 o t O L O t co co co O ca t M o co L NO Z O O m Co m co J C/) J m Co co m Co J Co J > m V) J co J Co J > co co To m Co et W 3 com co W Z a m N c O O COm CA N m O O Cn c to CA 19 0 C)) �rww O • m � � 3 mn m � m � m � o � o � IS ,,,-c cM mao VI O d N m N tl) Z Co M to m ID m N Pc- m °� m Cn D: in '.= N VI cc 2c U c)) c 111 mcLU 111Co 0c LO > > U a)0 CDin � . o ) U mem `n COQ wVI aci m 0 m > O m R - ate) s o m ° ami g o ca ci c ¢ C -C R E m to O s a ¢ c ca J T c to LL ° U oc y = 0: Y c x m 0 v m 06 D a n i c m T m t o m .c o m 2 U c i C7 a); c Ia ami W iL- c 0. 02 O QM aJ2 aO: Cn a � W 0. 0) amt Q ea CD a. a `a � CLUN ., • m Y c W 111 Y C co Y _ T Y N Lc) y 0 Co y 0 U)• y c Y Z CO• Y O N c A • M Q A C M N Co N (D ca =_ N Q) ca C) N a) 0 U) ' p) ca 0 CC N O W 0 Na_ COY � CO0a)) V) O. - Co3 - CI) U .- COU - to 1- ccna. W .- 1) u. a°) 000 ,- ti t T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O (, DO C7) O I CV co' I $1) CD h co. IU O M M d •a• V• •41' I'CO -: N N N N N N N N N N N T T T T T T T T T T T 0. O O O O O O O O O O 0 OO O O O O O O O O O cn kJ I I I I I I I I I I I W cc N. N. n N- n f` C N. N N N N N N N N N N N i ZO 0 O O O0 0 0 0 0 00 • Q G O O O 69 69 0 69 U) , 2 0. O O O CV 1_ W 69 69 69 t9 ei Cl)W 49 Q I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 2 69 6969 6699 6699 d d d d y a W 4, [T � H JZ 0 Od Od O O O Od O d ON ,�� O O O 00 40 69 O �1 W UJ 69 49 69 6699 4, W Q 1� O O O OO P .- 0) 000000 CD CO W H O O O O 0 0 C) N C)) K) CC) O O CC) ") h CD W O N M C 6 CC C)f 1ri ri r cD h.l DO r. ca � ,,m7t , N ~ z Q 69 b9 69 69 N co N W I-- 0 to 0 ININININ15 _j I-- �X m O W J J J J J J J J 0. a � � � aaacaaa . a Aw"i )o 0 Y y g r W a) 00000000 N ,-, T, O -6 ,13 _....9 ,1,' m m M CA. W N W W W W C) W W 4,4 ,- 60. °o J O a O O Q m U N N N N N N M Q . .. .200 .6- 202 v -r Y Y88888888 Y YUU Y YUU YUU Yvv YUU T 0 0 = 0 0 L ctl 0 .c p co - J Ca J C J O 8 O 0 0 0 0 NO Zmw ...1NUJU JC/) I•- m I- m I- m m mmmm mmm Q W Z co W o C) c rn 0) 0) rn rn I, > . y m 0 e m N m N d 0 m dri o 5n in 'nco ¢ 72inl" gu) "' min ") mcnU) min 's' W W cE ° gy c cSo c a o c a m c a m c ' h = 2 = ° ' Y6EDE ' E ' E ' YEE '' ~a = o m = m 2 a n = W.. = a c = n aVcv a a CnyO ^ .O / yOV) YCnYCC) Y _CcY 1NLN ' NW - R1j0Rpaapt LL 2N1Ur- LLaAn2OCUr- W01 61 \ A 0 O 0 O O O O Q I 1 I I I I 1 CA O N N A W N N N N 0 0 O E-.4 -s— rd a 3 00 v a v, 1J I I I I I I I W N N N N N N N �o_ TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator City of Shakopee FROM: Bret A. Weiss, P.E., Acting City Engineer` �r d RE: Assessment Hearing 1993 Street Reconstruction Program, Project No. 1993-7 DATE: October 27, 1994 Introduction Attached is Resolution No. 4110, a resolution adopting the special assessments for the 1993 Street Reconstruction Program, Project No. 1993-7. Background The 1993 Street Reconstruction Program was a compilation of six individual streets located as follows: • Naumkeag Street, between 2nd Avenue and 4th Avenue • 4th Avenue, between Naumkeag Street and Fillmore Street • Fillmore Street, between 2nd Avenue and 4th Avenue • Atwood Street, between 4th Avenue and 5th Avenue • Spencer Street, between 1st Avenue and 3rd Avenue • Spencer Street, between 4th Avenue and Shakopee Avenue • 8th Avenue, between Spencer Street and Atwood Street All construction work on these streets has now been completed and the final project costs have been identified. The assessments for this project should be certified to Scott County by November 30, 1994, as noted on the attached assessment roll. The final project costs are summarized as follows: Construction Costs $1,359,707.58 Engineering/Administrative Costs 296.286.16 Total Project Cost $1,655,993.74 H:\CIVIL\NM\BAW\102794.DC Dennis Kraft City Administrator City of Shakopee, MN October 27, 1994 Page 2 As was noted in the Feasibility Report, the total project cost can be separated by funding sources as follows: Capital Improvement Fund $777,423.37 Street Assessment 165,570.42 Sanitary Sewer Service Assessment 55,556.00 Shakopee Public Utility Commission 301,858.99 Sanitary Sewer Fund 271,842.54 Storm Sewer Fund 83.742.43 Total Project Cost $1,655,993.74 Funding Sources Capital Improvement Fund: The Capital Improvement Fund is intended to fund the project costs for the street construction costs that cannot be assessed according to the City Special Assessment Policy. This fund will utilize State Aid Funds collected from the Spencer Street and 4th Avenue construction projects. The actual State Aid Funds collected are anticipated to exceed the Capital Improvement Fund expenditures. This project includes all reconstructed streets and, therefore, the special assessments are proposed at 25% of the project cost of a 36-foot wide street. All of the streets, with the exception of Fillmore and Naumkeag Streets, were constructed to a 44-foot width. The Capital Improvement Fund will pay the increased cost of oversizing these streets from the 36-foot Shakopee standard. The project Feasibility Report recommended assessing the removal and replacement of sidewalk for all streets. However, in accordance with the revised assessment policy, sidewalk is no longer assessed on collector streets. Therefore, no sidewalk assessment is proposed for 4th Avenue or Spencer Street. Any other sidewalk reconstruction for the remainder of the project is being assessed at 25% of the project cost. Street Assessment: This funding source consists of the special assessment of street costs to the residents abutting each particular reconstructed street. As previously mentioned, all reconstructed streets are proposed to be assessed at 25% of a 36-foot wide street. This project utilizes two methods of assessing residential street construction as follows: Zonal Assessment: In accordance with the City Council Special Assessment Policy,all north/south streets(Atwood Street, Spencer Street,Fillmore Street, H:\CJ VIL\NM\BAW\102794.DC Dennis Kraft City Administrator City of Shakopee, MN October 27, 1994 Page 3 Naumkeag Street) shall be assessed on a zonal basis using an assessed area of one-half block on each side of the north/south streets. All lots within the zonal areas were assessed equally on a per lot basis. In addition, each street was constructed independently from the others so that construction costs could be accurately assessed to each particular street. This is the reason for the difference in the lot assessment for each street. The 25% assessment rate lot cost for each street assessed on a zonal basis is as follows: Final Project Cost Feasibility Report Cost Atwood Street $478.39/Lot $891.37/Lot Spencer Street $757.98/Lot $1,229.24/Lot Fillmore Street $368.45/Lot $545.02/Lot Naumkeag Street $595.54/Lot $601.27/Lot The final assessed per lot costs are all lower than what was estimated in the Feasibility Report due to changes in the project scope and better than anticipated construction costs. Front Footage Assessment: It has been Shakopee policy to assess east/west streets on a front footage basis, as identified in the Special Assessment Policy. Therefore, both 8th Avenue and 4th Avenue are proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis. Again, these streets were individually constructed and calculated for the final project costs. The 25% assessed portion front foot rate is as follows: Final Project Cost Feasibility Report Cost 4th Avenue $13.10/FF $15.48/FF 8th Avenue $13.23/FF $12.84/FF The final assessed front foot costs are lower for the 4th Avenue project and approximately 3% higher for the 8th Street project than what was estimated in the Feasibility Report. H:\CML\NM\BAW\102794.DC Dennis Kraft City Administrator City of Shakopee, MN October 27, 1994 Page 4 Sanitary Sewer Fund: The total sanitary sewer mainline project cost is $271,842.54. This includes the replacement of sewer mains that are not assessed according to the assessment policy, in addition to one-half of the cost for the new sanitary sewer main constructed along 8th Avenue from Sommerville Street west 200 feet. This new sanitary sewer main was constructed to replace a long service line existing in the boulevard area. According to the assessment policy, one-half of the project cost for the new sanitary sewer main construction will be assessed to the affected property owner and one-half to the sanitary sewer fund. The total costs of the one new sanitary sewer main is $3,674 to be split 50% to the property owner and 50% to the sanitary sewer fund. The remaining project costs are for sanitary sewer main replacement. Sanitary Sewer Services Assessment: This funding source includes the sanitary sewer service construction proposed to be assessed to the individual residents. The $55,556 project cost proposed for assessment includes all individual service replacements with the addition of one-half of the sewer mainline that was constructed along 8th Avenue, as previously mentioned. The sewer service assessment consists of the actual footage of service line replaced, as measured in the field. All defective service lines or improper service lines, such as shared services (not allowed by building codes), were corrected and replaced as part of this project. The service lines were replaced from the mains to the property lines. It is my understanding that, at the original public hearing, the City Staff indicated that the estimated assessments did include service line replacement costs for the affected properties. The attached assessment rolls include all necessary watermain service assessments, as identified by Shakopee Public Utilities. This project included only three water shut-off box replacements,all located along the Spencer Street reconstruction project. These are noted under the sewer service column on the assessment roll and were assessed at $75.00 each. Shakopee Public Utilities: The total watermain project costs are $301,858.99. This entire cost will be funded by Shakopee Public Utilities (SPUC). No new watermain or watermain services were constructed with this project and, therefore, the only proposed assessments are the three water shut-off boxes noted in the sewer assessment description. In addition, because there are no new water services constructed with the project, no trunk water charges are being assessed. The SPUC portion includes the Fuller Street reconstruction project costs. This street reconstruction was completed so that the watermain could be connected and looped along Fuller Street and, therefore, was a direct benefit to SPUC. In addition, any rock removal costs for lowering the watermain throughout the project is included in the watermain project costs. HACIVIL \BA W\102794.DC Dennis Kraft City Administrator City of Shakopee, MN October 27, 1994 Page 5 Storm Sewer Fund: The storm sewer project costs for the project amounted to $83,742.43, all of which will be paid for from the storm sewer fund. Special Assessment Credits The assessments, as noted on the assessment rolls, include any and all special assessment credits, as identified in the City of Shakopee Special Assessment Policy. These special assessment credits pertain to two particular areas as noted: Service Life: If an assessment anticipated for any item has not reached its anticipated service life, but was removed and replaced, the assessment would be credited based on the percentage between the service life at the time of replacement versus the service life expectancy. For example, sidewalks and street improvements all have a 20-year life expectancy and removal prior to that time would result in a credit to the adjoining property owner. This project has a few credits for concrete curb and gutter and sidewalk that have been accounted for in the assessment roll, and noted as such. Front Footage Adjustment: Several of the streets proposed to be assessed with this project include corner lots, which also receive an adjustment. Corner lots proposed to be assessed at the rate of 50% of the unit rate for the short side of the lot in question for each street improved. These adjustments are noted on the assessment roll under the front foot designation for the 4th Avenue and 8th Avenue assessment rolls. Assessment Appeals By law, anyone who wishes to appeal their assessment must file a written notice prior to or on the day of the public hearing. In the attachments are copies of all the appeal letters received by City Staff prior to the time this memo was mailed to the Council. After the public hearing, the persons who filed the intent to appeal have 30 days to officially initiate the legal appeal process. Summary Since the original assessment notices were sent out, the City Staff has continued to refine and adjust the proposed assessments based on discussions with SPUC (watermain portion), the City Attorney, other City Staff, property owners, and additional file research. Therefore, the assessments listed in the attached assessment roll may be different than the amount listed in the notices received by the property owner. H:\CIVIL\NM\BAW\102794.DC Dennis Kraft City Administrator City of Shakopee, MN October 27, 1994 Page 6 Upon the conclusion of the public testimony, attached is Resolution No. 4110,which adopts the assessments for this project. If the Council continues the public hearing, it should be continued to a date prior to November 30, 1994 in order to certify these assessments to the County. Action Requested Offer Resolution No. 4110, a resolution adopting assessments for the 1993 Reconstruction Project, Project No. 1993-7, and move its adoption. nm H:\CIVIL\NM\BAW\102794.DC To: City of Shakopee OCT ]-81994 C/Ty Harriet Pink • OF SHA b.. 27-001723-0 �� 735 South Atwood Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 I was assessed $277.46 for new sidewalk on the above property in 1993. This was paid in full. Also I had the apron on our driveway replaced in 1993 which was ' $340.00 (see attached) and this was paid in full. In 1994 all sidewalk on property and apron was dug out and replaced. and I was told by the City Engineer to submit an appeal of this assessment. Please consider this matter. _ Respectfully submitted, /a /7, y - /4 di+ A V/ S sus sr-►--F. Cis . , &w ,n, i t 9 ci cl •' ...- - . . .,. tiri:z) ... - .„... . ....: . , DEA-P___ Ivt1 , ... -*- 1 ,., • , 1.11-r-, 1 itcia aierriki& ;Al 44)11-45"ra i,73 . Pg-csaE.)C:r 4t 1993 -1 ..f.i. 149 OcrAJCER-M f 7ti-44" (Acr 41674-4 77t6. jrV Ze PLArCED Z- Elz:ri.op..Ns i:t, Mq Z 10 6 ti.)&Lk (AT PAltriAt-MC ixs-itAe) MO (ReFlikeZ,C1 meitA -e=o-n+ hestkiN Tai.5 ye-A-g_ As f): d- ....;.!,,, eY1ihi5 PR-0 .E.C::r t I Gex.ED -rite ckti c.i.L.e.r.:5 o01 _,E, Nab tiiti6 1-0UN -t- 6 PP-0?0,Z e.b CAST Ta M6 U.14(,)(.„1 ZE ki•.-.- , fk4:011si-eb... ACCAP-13 ING-Lvt , , ,..,,,,, , . , .., ._ _ _ --4 coRmi-r-E0 -ro 6arzokic-6 /12vo_ P-t,66- ic-r TO vault Mem-I-kr-0 e ' :::,•,'„ -ribt7VK- Vat) 4,- r., ,.. kr, , , s .._ . ,_ . f.---: ,. "Z.I_O t.131 Sill- A-VE 14*K. 6 !-. j , te; -":-- C S I 0,,. 9 / 1--(- iF---i4A-- ff-4-s I ,•...- ,.. . /43 1 (--(--(_- /-y( , CrTYOFSHAKOPEE . ..... irrn- D OCT 2 7 1994 r) . . , i_i,7_5. ECEIVE t_b , .. -- el . .. , ...- RESOLUTION NO. 4110 A Resolution Adopting Assessments. For The 1993 Reconstruction Project Project No. 1993-7 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council of the City of Shakopee met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessments of: • Naumkeag Street, between 2nd Avenue and 4th Avenue • 4th Avenue, between Naumkeag Street and Fillmpre Street • ' Fillmore Street, between 2nd Avenue and 4th Avenue • Atwood Street, between 4th Avenue and 5th Avenue ♦ ' Spencer Street, between 1st Avenue and 3rd Avenue • Spencer Street, between 4th Avenue and Shakopee Avenue ♦ ; 8th Avenue, between Spencer Street and Atwood Street The improvements consisted of pavement, curb& gutter, sidewalks, storm sewer, utilities and all the necessary appurtenances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. That such proposed assessment together with any amendments thereof,a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein and each tract therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvements in the amount of the assessments levied against it. 2. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1995, and shall bear interest at the rate of 8.0 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added the interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1995 and to each subsequent installment when due shall be added the interest for one year on all unpaid installments. • 3. The owner of anypropertyso assessed may, at anytime prior to certification of the p assessment to the County Auditor,pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of this resolution; the owner may thereafter pay to the County Treasurer the installment and interest in process of collection on the current tax list, and may pay the remaining principal balance of the assessment to the City Treasurer. 4. The Clerk shall file the assessment rolls pertaining to this assessment in her office and shall certify annually to the County Auditor on or before November 30th of each year the total . amount of installments and interest on assessments on each parcel of land which are to become due in the following year. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney OCTOBER 3, 1994 NA UMKEAG STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL 2ND AVE. TO 4TH AVE. AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED.STREET PORTION=$11315.28 'i LEGAL NUMBER STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 27-004128-0 THOMAS MARSCHALL LOT 3,BLK.26:;: 0.50 $297.77 $0.00 $297.77 1019 E.3RD AVE. EAST SHAKOPEE_ SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-004129-0 DELPHINE GOOD LOT 4,BLK 26 ''1.00 $595.54 $0.00 $595.54 1025 E.3RD AVE. EAST SHAKOPEE SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 _ 27-004130-0 BARBARA DELLWO LOT 5,BLK.26 1.00 $595.54 $0.00 $595.54 234 NAUMKEAG ST. EAST SHAKOPEE SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-004131-0 ROBERT SHAW,JR. LOT 6,7&E 1/2 OF 2.50 $1,488.85 $435.00 $1,923.85 8204 NICOLLET S. 8,BLK 26 i MPLS.,MN 55420 EAST SHAKOPEE 27-004135-0 DALE&LEANN MEYER LOT 4,BLK 27& 1.00 $595.54 $0.00 $595.54 1019 E.4TH AVE. P/O VACATED ALLEY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 EAST SHAKOPEE ' 27-004136-0 RICHARD SCHNEIDER LOT 5,BLK 27& 1.00 $595.54 $364.00 $959.54 336 S. NAUMKEAG ST. P/O VACATED ALLEY , SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 EAST SHAKOPEE 27-004139-0 PATRICK ADAMS LOTS 1-5,BLK 28 2.50 $1,488.85 $420.00 $1,908.85 SUNDANCE CLINIC &N 1/2 VAC 4TH AV 4TH&NAUMKEAG W OF BLK 35&E SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 OF NAUMKEAG&P/O VAC SHAWMUT ST EAST SHAKOPEE 27-004142-0 ROGER&LINDA BOECKMAN LOT 8,BLK 28 0.50 $297.77 $0.00 $297.77 1118 E.3RD AVE. DOC145864 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 EAST SHAKOPEE 27-004143-0 ROGER&BARBARA MONNENS LOT 9,BLK 28 1.00 $595.54 $0.00 $595.54 1110 E.3RD AVE. DOC149796 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 EAST SHAKOPEE 27-004144-0 DARRELL SWARTWOOD&WIFE LOT 10,BLK 28 1.00 $595.54 $0.00 $595.54 1108 E. 3RD AVE. EAST SHAKOPEE SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-004145-0 BUDLERGAN ENTERPRISES LOTS 1 &2, 2.00 $1,191.08 $65.00 $1,256.08 3936 NATCHEZ AVE. SO. BLK 29 MPLS.,MN 55416 EAST SHAKOPEE 27-004146-0 LINDA FOSS LOT 3 0.50 $297.77 $0.00 $297.77 1115 E.3RD AVE. BLK 29 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 EAST SHAKOPEE 27-004151-0 TODD D. &CRYSTAL L. HOLMAN S 1/2 OF LOTS 9 1.00 $595.54 $39.00 $634.54 217 NAUMKEAG ST. &10,BLK 29 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 EAST SHAKOPEE 27-004152-0 SHAKOPEE HRA LOT 8,BLK 29 0.50 $297.77 $0.00 $297.77 129 S. HOLMES STREET EAST SHAKOPEE SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-004152-1 DAVID MCGOVERN N 1/2 OF LOTS 9 1.00 $595.54 $26.00 $621.54 205 S. NAUMKEAG &10,BLK. 29 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 EAST SHAKOPEE 27-101001-0 GWENDOLYN&JEROME OLSON LOT 1, BLK 1"• 0.50 $268.52 $39.00 $307.52 300 S. NAUMKEAG ST. LINK'S 2ND ADDN SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 OCTOBER 3, 1994 _ NAUMKEAG STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL 2ND AVE. TO 4THAVE. • AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED STREET PORTION=$11315.28 LEGAL NUMBER STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 27-101002-0 ARDEN&BARBARA KVAM LOT 2,BLK 1"' 0.50 $268.52 $26.00 $294.52 308 NAUMKEAG ST. LINK'S 2ND ADDN SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-101003-0 JURI SOKOLOV LOT 3,BLK 1"' 0.50 $268.52 $52.00 $320.52 316 NAUMKEAG ST. + LINK'S 2ND ADDN SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-101004-0 DOROTHY WEED LOT 4,BLK 1*** 0.50 $268.52 $39.00 $307.52 324 NAUMKEAG ST. LINK'S 2ND ADDN SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 • TOTALS= 19.00 $11,198.28 $1,505.00 $12,703.28 r COST PER LQt= $595.54 "' THIS PROPERTY CREDITED FOR EXISTING CURB GUTTER LESS THAN 20 YEARS OLD . OCTOBER 3, 1994 4TH AVENUE ASSESSMENT ROLL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FOR STREET PORTION=$50066.10,:. FRONT STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOT ASSESSMENT SERVICE ASSESSMENT 27-001824-0 Florian L. &Donna Dressen Lot 1 Block 166 , , 60.00 $785.78 $495.00 $1,280.78 337 S. Fillmore St. Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 • 27-001825-0 Elsie B. Stemmer Lot 2&W.40'of'Cot 3 100.00 $1,309.63 $540.00 '$1,849.63 515 E.4th Avenue Block 166 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 27-001826-0 Terry Heckman E. 10'of 3,All of 4& 80.00 $1,047.71 $442.00 $1,489.71 523 E.4th Avenue W.30'of 5 Block 166 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 27-001827-0 Todd A&Lynn M Anderson E.20'of 5&W.50' of 6 70.00 $916.74 $540.00 $1,456.74 537 E.4th Avenue Block 166 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat. 27-001828-0 Evelyn R Lehman E. 10'of 6&All of 7 70.00 $916.74 $429.00 $1,345.74 545 E.4th Avenue Block 166 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 27-004024-0 James R&Alice Pfleghaar Lot 1 Block 4 60.00 $785.78 $39.00 $824.78 603 E.4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-004025-0 Cynthia J.Randall Lot 2 Block 4 60.00 $785.78 $585.00 $1,370.78 613 E.4th Avenue East Shakopee.Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 _ 27-004026-0 Alan A Marschall Lot 3 Block 4 60.00 $785.78 $600.00 $1,385.78 619 E.4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-004027-0 Ronald Schmidtbauer Lot 4 Block 4 60.00 $785.78 $600.00 $1,385.78 627 E.4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn., 55379 27-004028-0 Robert A&Kimberly Kessler Lot 5 Block 4 60.00 $785.78 $533.00 $1,318.78 637 E 4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-004034-0 Joe G&Paulette Meuffels W. 1/2 Lots 1 &2 71.00 $929.84 $494.00 $1,423.84 329 Market Street S. Block 5 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-004035-0 Esther M Marrinan E.71'of Lots 1 &2 71.00 $929.84 $546.00 $1,475.84 713 E.4th Avenue Block 5 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-004039-0 John A Roepke&Wife Lot 6&W.25'of 7 85.00 $1,113.19 $520.00 $1,633.19 725 E.4th Avenue Block 5 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-004040-0 Bernard Goehring&Wife Lot 8&E.25' of 7 85.00 $1,113.19 $500.50 $1,613.69 735 E.4th Avenue Block 5 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-004072-0 Fred J Kaley&Wife Lot 1 &W. 1/2 of 2 90.00 $1,178.67 $442.00 $1,620.67 805 E.4th Avenue Block 12 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-004073-0 Kevin T Hennes E. 1/2 of 2&All of 3 90.00 $1,178.67 $468.00 $1,646.67 815 E.4th Avenue Block 12 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat OCTOBER 3, 1994 4TH AVENUE ASSESSMENT ROLL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FOR STREET PORTION=$50066.10 FRONT STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOT ASSESSMENT SERVICE ASSESSMENT 27-004074-0 Katherine&Taylor Poston Lot 5 Block 12 60.00 $785.78 $525.00 $1,310.78 835 E.4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-004074-1 Lyle&Sharon Johnson Lot 4 Block 12 60.00 $785.78 $910.00 $1,695.78 825 E.4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-004080-0 Scott D&Susan M Marker Lot 1 Ex.N.8'for Alley 60.00 $785.78 $364.00 $1,149.78 903 E.4th Avenue Block 13 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-004081-0 Steven D&Francis Haeg Lot 2 Block 13 60.00 $785.78 $97.50 $883.28 913 E.4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-004082-0 Donald C Anderson&Wife Lot 3 Block 13 60.00 $785.78 $494.00 $1,279.78 921 E.4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-004083-0 Jerome L Schmidt&Wife Lot 4 Block 13 60.00 $785.78 $494.00 $1,279.78 927 E.4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-004084-0 Alfred Pudil Lot 5 Block 13 60.00 $785.78 $520.00 $1,305.78 937 E.4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-004134-0 Scott L Theis Lot 3&P/0 Vacated Alley 60.00 $785.78 $494.00 $1,279.78 1017 E.4th Avenue Block 27 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-004135-0 Dale R&Leann E Meyer Lot 4&P/O Vacated Alley 60.00 $785.78 $448.50 $1,234.28 1019 E.4th Avenue Block 27 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-004136-0 Richard J Schneider Lot 5&P/O Vacated Alley 60.00 $785.78 $0.00 $785.78 336 S. Naumkeag Block 27 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-005001-0 Jerome J&Verna C Rein Lot 7&E 10'of 8 60.00 $785.78 $598.00 $1,383.78 638 E.4th Avenue Block 208 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Leremondis Addn. 27-005002-1 Steven W&Jayne Edmundson Lots 8&9 90.00 $1,178.67 $507.00 $1,685.67 630 E.4th Avenue Ex E. 10'of 8 Block 208 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Leremondis Addn. 27-005003-0 Thomas F&Cathy J Odenthal Lot 10&E 30'of 11 80.00 $1,047.71 $540.00 $1,587.71 618 E.4th Avenue Block 208 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Leremondis Addn. 27-005004-0 Paul R&Lisa Gehrke W 20'of 11 &E 15'of 12 35.00 $458.37 $546.00 $1,004.37 612 E.4th Avenue Block 208 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Leremondis Addn. 27-005005-0 Michael J&Judith M Gappa Lot 12 Ex. E 15' 35.00 $458.37 $520.00 $978.37 604 E.4th Avenue Block 208 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Leremondis Addn. 27-005007-0 State of Minnesota E 7'of N 130'of Lot 9 7.00 $91.67 $0.00 $91.67 C/O Scott County Auditor Block 209 428 S. Holmes St. Leremondis Addn. Shakopee,Mn. 55379 • OCTOBER 3, 1994 4TH AVENUE ASSESSMENT ROLL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FOR STREET PORTION=$50066.10 FRONT STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOT ASSESSMENT SERVICE ASSESSMENT 27-005008-0 Gary A&Janice M Steffi N 130'pf w 50' of Lot 9 62.50 $818.52 $520.00 $1,338.52 724 E.4th Avenue &E 121/2'of N 130' Shakopee,Mn. 55379 of 10, 'Block 209 Leremmondis Addn. 27-005009-0 John J&Rose I Mertz N 130'of 10 Ex. E. 12 1/2' 62.50 $818.52 $533.00 $1,351.52 714 E 4th Avenue &E 25'of N 130'of 11 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Block 209 Leremondis Addn. 27-005010-0 Donald R Plekkenpol N 130'of 12&N 130'of W 75.00 $982.22 $585.00 $1,567.22 706 E.4th Avenue 25',of 11 Block 209 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Len§m ondis Addn. 27-097001-0 Nancy Nguyen Lot 1 Block 1 59.85 $783.82 $0.00 $783.82 407 Minnesota Street Macey 2nd Addition Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-097013-0 Ian G.&Kay D.Gamble Lot 1 Block 3 92.96 $1,217.44 $0.00 $1,217.44 406 Minnesota Street Macey 2nd Addition Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-106001-0 David M&Michelle Towers Lot 1 Block 1 41.50 $543.50 $39.00 $582.50 1001 E.4th Avenue Links 3rd Addition Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-106002-0 Donna Hartmann Lot 2 Block 1 41.50 $543.50 $58.50 $602.00 1003 E.4th Avenue Links 3rd Addition Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-106003-0 Ethel F Anderson Lot 3 Block 1 41.50 $543.50 - $468.00 $1,011.50 1009 E.4th Avenue Links 3rd Addition Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-106004-0 Mabel M Jorgenson Lot 4 Block 1 41.50 $543.50 $442.00 $985.50 1011 E.4th Avenue Links 3rd Addition Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-906035-0 City of Shakopee 11.52 A. in N1/2 of SW1/4 178.12 $2,332.72 $615.00 $2,947.72 129 S. Holmes Street &all of vacated RR Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Sect 61115 R22 27-906039-0 Lyle A&Corby Jo Bakken P/O NE1/4,SW1/4 Corn. 668.3' 60.00 $785.78 $520.00 $1,305.78 4376 Hickory Hills Trail SW of NE Cor SW 20.32'to Prior Lake,Mn. 55372 BP 144.3'SW 45.75' N to PT 60' SW of beg. NE 60'to beg.&parcel S of above N of Macey Plat Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906040-0 Clyde D&Debby L Harrison DOC147938 P/O NE1/4,SW1/4 60.86 $797.04 $520.00 $1,317.04 938 E.4th Avenue Corn 668.3' SW of NE Cor,SW Shakopee,Mn. 55379 22.32', 144.3',SW 149.61', N 30'to P-O-B,NE 60.86', N 112',SW 60.86',S112'to Beg. Sect 6 T115 R22 OCTOBER 3, 1994 4TH AVENUE ASSESSMENT ROLL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FOR STREET PORTION=$50066.10 FRONT STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOT ASSESSMENT SERVICE ASSESSMENT 27-906041-0 Alfred R&Marie V Gamauf P/O NE1/4 SW1/4 Com 668.3' 55.22 • $723.18 $494.00 $1,217.18 1004 E.4th Avenue SW of NE Cor,SW 20.32',SE Shakopee,Mn. 55379 144.3',SW 45.75'to POB, Sw 43',N 142',NE 55.22', S to POB&Parcel Lying Between S Boundary of Above &N Boundary of Macey Plat, Between S Ext of E&W Boundaries of Above Parcel. Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906058-0 Douglas E&Carol J Snell P/O NE1/4 SW1/4 Beg.Extens 60.00 $785.78 $546.00 $1,331.78 906 E.4th Avenue S Line 4th&E Line of S Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Ext Dakota St.,S 142',E 60',N 142',W 60'to Beg Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906059-0 Joseph W&Myrtle Ruetten P/O NE1/4 SW1/4 Beg 60' E 60.00 $785.78 $520.00 $1,305.78 914 E.4th Avenue of Intersect E Line S Ext Shakopee,Mn. 55379 of Dakota St. &S Line 4th, S 142',E 60',N142',W 60' to Beg. Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906108-0 Richard F DeMers&Wife 60'x 130'in,NW1/4 SW1/4 60.00 $785.78 $487.50 $1,273.28 538 E.4th Ave. Sect 6 T115 R22 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-906118-0 Richard R Allison&Wife 60'x 142'in NE1/4 SW1/4 60.00 $785.78 $520.00 $1,305.78 926 E 4th Avenue &10.55'x 60 x 8.78'x 60' Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Adj. Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906119-0 Mark B.Oman P/O NE1/4 SW1/4 Beg S Line 60.00 $785.78 $500.50 $1,286.28 922 E 4th Ave. 4th St 120' E of Dakota St Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Inters,S 142',E 60', N 142',W 60'to Beg Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906120-0 City of Shakopee P/O NE1/4 SW1/4 Corn S Line 49.80 $652.20 $0.00 $652.20 129 S Holmes Street of 4th St 657.1'SW of NE Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Cor,S 208',E 49',N 216.9',W 49.8'to POB. Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906128-0 Mathias Mather P/O NW1/4 SW1/4 Beg 117' E of 160.00 $2,095.41 $705.00 $2,800.41 520 E.4th Avenue Range Line,S 205.5', E160', Shakopee,Mn. 55379 N 205.5',W 160' Ex.17 Ac Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906129-0 Sheila Culver P/O NW1/4 SW1/4 Beg 121'W of 60.00 $785.78 $442.00 $1,227.78 530 E.4th Avenue NW Cor Blk 208,Leremondis Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Addn W 60',S125.5',E 60', N125.5'to Beg Ex RR ROW Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906130-0 Michael J&Judith M Gappa P/O NW1/4 SW1/4 Beg 10.1'W 10.10 $132.27 $0.00 $132.27 604 E.4th Avenue • of NW Cor BIk 208,S 130',E Shakopee,Mn. 55379 10.1',N 130',W 10.1'to Beg Sect 6 T115 R22 OCTOBER 3, 1994 4TH AVENUE ASSESSMENT ROLL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FOR STREET PORTION=$50066.10 FRONT STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOT ASSESSMENT SERVICE ASSESSMENT 27-906131-0 Dean R Woodbridge&Wife P/O NW1/4 SW1/4 Beg 10.1'W 51.00 $667.91 $500.50 $1,168.41 548 E.4th Avenue of NW Cor BIk 208,W 51',S Shakopee,Mn. 55379 130',E 51',N 130'to Beg Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906136-0 Merrill E Mobley&Wife P/O NE1/2 SW1/4 Beg Inters 120.00 $1,571.56 $1,092.00 $2,663.56 838 E.4th Avenue S Line of 4th&W Line of Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Dakota S 142',W 120',N 142',E to Beg. Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906137-0 Lance J Hespenheide P/O NE1/2 SW1/4 Beg. 120'W 60.00 $785.78 $559.00 $1,344.78 820 E.4th Avenue of Intersect 4th&Dakota, Shakopee,Mn. 55379 W 60',S 142',E 60',N to Beg. Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906146-0 Mildred Unze P/O NW1/4 SW1/4 Beg.60' E 60.00 $785.78 $559.00 $1,344.78 810 E.4th Avenue of E Line Minn St on S Line Shakopee,Mn. 55379 of E 4th,S 142',E 60',N 142',W 60'to Beg. Sect 6 T115 R22 TOTALS= 3822.91 $50,066.10 $26,057.50 $76,123.60 COST PER FRONT FOOT= $13.10 OCTOBER 3, 1994 FILLMORE STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL 3RD AVE. TO 4TH AVE. AND 1/2 SOUTH BLOCK BEETWEEN 2ND AND 3RD AVE. AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FOR STREET PORTION=$7689.53 LEGAL NUMBER STREET SEWER _ TOTAL PID# OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 27-001210-0 JOHN&GWENDOLYN HENNEN LOT 3,BLK 27 0.50 $184.22 $0.00 $184.22 421 E.3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001211-0 DALE DUFF LOT 4, BLK 27 1.00 $368.45 $0.00 $368.45 429 W.3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001212-0 JAMES F. LINDQUIST LOT 5,BLK 27 1.00 $368.45 $0.00 $368.45 437 3RD AVENUE E. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001378-0 COLE&RUTH VANHORN LOTS 3&4 1.50 $552.67 $0.00 $52.67 437 E.4TH AVE. BLK 52E SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001379-0 STANLEY&ARLEN STEJSKAL LOT 5-7440 SQ. 0.87 $320.55 $442.00 , $762.55 326 FILLMORE ST. FT. IN N OF RR SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 BLK 52 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001380-0 HELMER&NANCY HALVERSON LOT 6,BLK 52 1.00 $368.45 $0.00 $368.45 13624 SPRING LAKE RD. SHAKOPEE CITY MINNETONKA,MN 55345 • 27-001381-0 ROHN&KAREN PRECHT ' LOT 7,BLK 52 1.00 $368.45 $0.00 $368.45 430 E.3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001382-0 CHARLES&VICTORIA EVERETT LOT 8,BLK 52 0.50 $184.22 $0.00 $184.22 424 E.3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001824-0 FLORIAN&DONNA DRESSEN LOT 1,BLK 166 1.00 $368.45 $0.00 $368.45 337 S.FILLMORE SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001825-0 ELSIE STEMMER LOT 2&W 40'OF 1.50 $552.67 $0.00 $552.67 515 E.4TH AVE. 3,BLK 166 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001826-0 TERRY HECKMAN E 10'OF 3,ALL 1.50 $552.67 $0.00 $552.67 523 E.4TH AVE. OF 4&W 30'0F 5 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 BLK 166 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001827-0 TODD&LYNN ANDERSON E 20'OF 5&W 50' 1.00 $368.45 $0.00 $368.45 537 E.4TH AVE. OF 6,BLK 166 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001828-0 EVELYN LEHMAN E 10' OF 6&ALL 0.50 $184.22 $0.00 $184.22 545 E.4TH AVE. OF 7, BLK 166 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001829-0 BERNICE LEBENS LOT 8,BLK 166 0.50 $184.22 $0.00 $184.22 548 E. 3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001830-0 JEROME WAGNER&WIFE LOT 9,BLK 166 1.00 $368.45 $0.00 $368.45 538 E. 3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 ' OCTOBER 3, 1994. FILLMORE STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL 3RD AVE. TO 4TH AVE. AND 1/2 SOUTH BLOCK BEETWEEN 2ND AND 3RD AVE. AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FOR STREET PORTION=$7689.53 LEGAL NUMBER STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 27-001831-0 DAVID&WANDA MAKIS LOT 10,BLK 166 1.00 $368.45 $0.00 $368.45 520,E.3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001832-0 EUGENE NETZBANDT&WIFE LOT 11-12, 2.00 $736.90 $0.00 $736.90 518 E.3RD AVE. BLK 166 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001833-0 JAMES&MARY MEISINGER LOT 13,BLK 166 1.00 $368.45 $0.00 $368.45 596 E.3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001834-0 DELILAH BOLZ LOT 1,BLK 167 1.00 $368.45 $0.00 $368.45 563 E.3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001835-0 JESSICA&KRISTINE SAMES LOT 2,BLK 167 1.00 $368.45 $0.00 $368.45 511 E.3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001836-0 LLOYD F.&COLLEEN J. LOERZEL LOT 3,BLK 167 0.50 $184.22 $0.00 $184.22 519 E.3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 TOTALS= 20.87 $7,689.53 $442.00 $8,131.53 COST PER LOT= $368.45 • OCTOBER 3, 1994 • ATWOOD STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL 4TH AVE. TO STH AVE. AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FOR STREET PORTION =$4783.90 LEGAL NUMBER PID# OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT 27-001433-0 ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL W1/2 OF 9 &ALL OF 5 $2,391.95 325 W. 5TH AVE. W1/2 OF BLOCK 57 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001434-0 ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL ALL OF BLOCK 58 5 $2;391.95 325 W. 5TH AVE. . , SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 TOTALS= 10 $4,783.90 COST PER LOT= $478.39 �' OCTOBER 3, 1994 - SPENCER STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL • (1ST AVE TO SHAKOPEE AVE. - EXCEPT FROM 3RD AVE. TO 4TH AVE.) AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FOR_STREET PORTION=$64428.71 LEGAL NUMBER STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT SERVICE ASSESSMENT 27-081192-0 BART PARTNERS LOT 3,BLK 25 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 4804 W.60TH ST. SHAKOPEE CITY EDINA,MN 55424 27-001193-0 DAVID&JANE CHASE LOT 4,BLK 25 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 228 HWY.212 E. SHAKOPEE CITY CHASKA,MN 55318 27-001194-0 MELVIN&ARLIS WALEN LOT 5,BLK 25 1.00 $757.98 $615.00 $1,372.98 2401 165TH ST.W. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001195-0 DONALD SPRAGUE LOT 6,BLK 25 1.00 $757.98 $517.50 $1,275.48 f 338 E. FIRST AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001196-0 DONALD SPRAGUE LOT 7,BLK 25 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 338 E.FIRST AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001197-0 JOELLE SAWVEL LOT 8,BLK 25 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 320 E. FIRST AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 _ 27-001200-0 BETTY LOU MACALLISTER LOT 1,BLK 26 1.00 $757.98 $585.00 $1,342.98 403 E.2ND AVE. SHAKOPEE CIT Y SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001201-0 MERLE NELSON LOT 2,BLK 26 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 411 E.2ND AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001202-0 LAURA BJORKLUND W 50'OF LOT 3 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 419 E.2ND AVE. BLK 26 - SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001205-0 HOLIDAY STATIONSTORE,INC. LOT 6,7&8,BLK 26 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 P.O. BOX 1224 SHAKOPEE CITY BLOOMINGTON,MN 55440 27-001206-0 HARMON HARRISON,JR. LOT 9,BLK 26 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 4141/2 E. 1ST ST. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001207-0 R. KATHLEEN MORRIS LOT 10,BLK 26 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 2615 SPRING LAKE RD. S.W. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001208-0 JOHN L.&KAY E.GLUTH LOT 1,BLK 27 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 403 E.3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001209-0 MARVIN&GLORIA GUSTAFSON LOT 2,BLK 27 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 413 E. 3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001210-0 JOHN&GWENDOLYN HENNEN LOT 3,BLK 27 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 421 E. 3RD SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001215-0 RONALD&BETTY OTTO LOT 8,BLK.27 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 418 E.2ND AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 • OCTOBER 3, 1994 SPENCER STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL (1ST AVE. TO SHAKOPEE AVE. - EXCEPT FROM 3RD AVE. TO 4TH AVE.) I AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FOR STREET PORTION=$64428.71 LEGAL NUMBER STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT SERVICE ASSESSMENT 27-001216-0 GERALD&MARY KAY FELTMANN ' LOTS 9&10 2.00 $1;515.97 $570.00 $2,085.97 9509 DAKOTA ROAD BLK 27 MPLS.,MN 55438 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001220-0 LEROY D. &LEONE E. LISTRUDE LOT 3& W 1/2 1.00 . ' $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 323 E.3RD AVE. OF 4,BLK 28 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001221-0 LUKE LUND LOT 5&E 1/2 1.50 $1,136.98 $0.00 $1,136.98 337 E.3RD AVE. OF 4,BLK 28 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001222-0 STEVEN THOMAS LOT 6,BLK 28 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 336 2ND AVE. E. SHAKOPEE CITY i SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001223-0 STEVEN E.&KELLY J. NELSON LOT 7,BLK 28 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 328 2ND AVE. E. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001224-0 ROBERT&BETTY DRURY LOT 8,BLK 28 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 P.O. BOX 193 SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 i 27-001385-0 EDWARD SIEBENALER S 1/2 OF LOT 1 & 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 322 E.5TH AVE. S 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 2,BLK 53 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001386-0 EDWARD SIEBENALER N 1/2 OF LOT 1 & 1.50 $1,136.98 $0.00 $1,136.98 322 E.5TH AVE. N 1/2 OF W 1/2-2 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 E 1/2 OF 2&ALL OF 3,BLK 53 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001392-0 CHRISTIAN BARLAGE&WIFE LOT 8,BLK 53 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 420 E.4TH AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001393-0 DWIGHT D. BROWN E 55'OF 9, 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 412 E.4TH ST. BLK 53 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001394-0 RODNEY&JOYCE CLEMENS LOT 10&W 5' OF 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 402 EAST 4TH AVE. 9,BLK.53 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001397-0 VIOLET JOHNSEN LOT 3,BLK 54 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 RT. 1,BOX 320 SHAKOPEE CITY ST.MARIES,ID 83861 27-001398-0 MARIE REIN LOT 4, BLK 54 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 329 E.5TH AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001399-0 WILLIARD FORSTER&WIFE LOT 5,BLK 54 1.00 $757.98 $600.00 $1,357.98 335 E.5TH AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001400-0 AUDREY MONNENS E 45' OF 6 0.75 $568.49 $0.00 $568.49 18200 HUMMINGBIRD RD. BLK.54 WAYZATA,MN 55391 SHAKOPEE CITY OCTOBER 3, 1994 _ SPENCER STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL (1ST AVE. TO SHAKOPEE AVE. -EXCEPT FROM 3RD AVE. TO 4TH AVE.) i AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FOR STREET PORTION=$64428.71 ', LEGAL NUMBER STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT SERVICE ASSESSMENT 27-001401-0 THOMAS SCHMIDT W 15'OF 6&ALL 1.25 $947.48 $0.00 $947.48 330 E.4TH AVE. OF 7,BLK 54 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001402-0 RAYMOND WINKEL&WIFE LOT 8,BLK 54 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 322 E.4TH AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001571-0 STEVEN&CHERYL TUTTLE LOT 3,BLK 76 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 319 E.6TH AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001572-0 EDWARD&TAMA VOHNOUTKA LOT 4,BLK 76 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 327 E.6TH AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001572-1 RICHARD&TAMATHA CARLSON LOT5,BLK 76 1.00 $757.98 $507.00 $1,264.98 532 S.SPENCER ST. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001573-0 WAYNE&MARY WINKELS LOT 6,BLK 76 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 334 E.5TH AVE SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001574-0 EDWARD SIEBENALER&WIFE LOTS 7&8 1.50 $1,136.98 $0.00 $1,136.98 322 E.5TH AVE. BLK 76 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001577-0 VIRGIL F.STIER LOT 1 &W'ERLY 23' 1.50 $1,136.98 $520.00 $1,656.98 537 S.SPENCER ST. OF 2 EX N 8' FOR SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 ALLEY,BLK 77 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001578-0 ARTHUR SKAUGE&WIFE LOT 3 EX W ERLY 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 423 E.6TH AVE. 25.5'OF 4&5& SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 FRACTIONAL LOTS EX N 8' FOR ALLEY BLK 77 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001579-0 HAROLD KOLLASCH&WIFE LOT 2 EX W'ERLY 23'& 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 415 E.6TH AVE. W'ERLY 25.5'OF 3 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 EX N 8' FOR ALLEY BLK 77 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001582-0 LINDA DOEPKE LOT 8 EX S. 8' 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 420 E.5TH AVE. FOR ALLEY,BLK 77 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001583-0 LINDA DOEPKE LOT 9 EX S.8' 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 420 E.5TH AVE. FOR ALLEY,BLK 77 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001584-0 ESTHER JOHNSON LOT 10 EX S.8' 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 404 E.5TH AVE. FOR ALLEY,BLK 77 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001585-0 CATHERINE PASS S 60'OF LOTS 1 1.00 $757.98 $507.00 $1,339.98 639 S.SPENCER TO 3 EX EAST 16' $75.00 WATER SHUT SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 BLK 78 -OFF BOX SHAKOPEE CITY OCTOBER 3, 1994 SPENCER STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL ' (1ST AVE. TO SHAKOPEE AVE. - EXCEPT FROM 3RD AVE. TO 4TH AVE.) f AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FOR STREET PORTION=$64428.71 LEGAL NUMBER STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT SERVICE ASSESSMENT 27-001586-0 HAROLD CASTLE&WIFE S 60'OF E 16' 0;00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 507 E.7TH OF BLK 78 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001587-0 SEAN&CHAROLOTTE LAUGHLIN N 60'OF S 120'OF ' 1.00 $757.98 $520.00 $1,277.98 629 SPENCER ST. 1-2-3&N 22'OF SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 --- S 142'OF E 16' OF BLK 78 • SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001589-0 CLEMENS MENDEN&WIFE N 22'OF LOTS 1.00 $757.98 $520.00 $1,277.98 619 SPENCER ST. 1-2-3&7-8-9 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 EX E 16' &S 22' 1 OF BLK 78 ' SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001590-0 EUGENE MENDEN&WIFE S 60'OF N 120' 1.00 $757.98 $429.00 $1,186.98 615 SPENCER ST. OF7TO10EX SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 E 16',BLK 78 • SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001591-0 BERTRAND GOEMER&WIFE N 60'OF LOTS 7 i 1.00 $757.98 $520.00 $1,352.98 603 SPENCER ST. TO 10 EX E 16' $75.00 WATER SHUT SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 BLK 78 -OFF BOX SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001595-0 DAVID&JOANNE BLOCK E 50'OF 3& 0.75 $568.49 $0.00 $568.49 3097TH AVE. E. W25'OFS71' SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 OF 4,BLK 79 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001596-0 RONALD GRATZ S 71'OF LOTS 4& 0.75 $568.49 $585.00 $1,153.49 335 E.7TH AVE. 5 EX W 25'OF S SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 71' OF 4, BLK 79 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001597-0 STANLEY DELBOW N 71'OF LOTS 4& 1.00 $757.98 $540.00 $1,297.98 626 SPENCER ST. 5,BLK 79 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001598-0 RAYMOND G SCHMITT&WIFE S 71'OF LOT 6 0.50 $378.99 $520.00 $898.99 614 S.SPENCER ST. BLOCK 79 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001599-0 MARJORIE R HENDERSON N 71' OF LOT 6 0.50 $378.99 $520.00 $898.99 905 S.HOLMES ST. BLOCK 79 1 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001600-0 SANDRA K COZINE LOT 7 BLOCK 79 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 330 E.6TH AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001601-0 DUANE J&DARLENE F RANDALL LOT 8 BLOCK 79 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 322 E.6TH AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001760-0 CYNTHIA ERICKSON LOT 3 BLOCK 102 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 21482 PARK BLVD SHAKOPEE CITY JORDAN,MN. 55352 OCTOBER 3, 1994 SPENCER STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL (1ST AVE. TO SHAKOPEE AVE. - EXCEPT FROM 3RD AVE. TO 4TH AVE.)_ 1 AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FOR STREET PORTION=$64428.71 LEGAL NUMBER STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT SERVICE ASSESSMENT 27-001761-0 JACK A&VENETTA M ANDERSON S 71'OF 4&5 1.00 $757.98 $26.00 $783.98 13550 TOWNLINE AVE. BLOCK 102 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001762-0 TIMOTHY P. BISEK N 71'OF 4&5 1.00 $757.98 $39.00 $796.98 726 SPENCER ST. BLOCK 102 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001763-0 JOHN A&SUSAN B BERENS N 71'OF 6&7 1.00 $757.98 $520.00 $1,277.98 706 S.SPENCER ST. BLOCK 102 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001764-0 WALTER F RUHLAND&WIFE S 71'0F 6&7 1.00 $757.98 $645.00 $1,402.98 716 SPENCER ST. BLOCK 102 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001765-0 HERBERT DALLMANN&WIFE LOT 8,BLK.102 0.50 $378.99 $b.00 $378.99 320 E.7TH AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-001768-0 RODNEY L JOHNSON S 71'OF 1 &2 1.00 $757.98 $600.00 $1,357.98 735 S.SPENCER ST. BLOCK 103 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001769-0 SCOTT J.FIEBELKORN N 71'OF 1 &2 1.00 $757.98 $600.00 $1,357.98 727 S.SPENCER BLOCK 103 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001770-0 EDMUND H MOSSER&WIFE LOTS 8 TO 10 EX S1/2 71' 1.00 $757.98 $630.00 $1,462.98 404 E.7TH AVE. OF SAID LOTS BLOCK 103 $75.00 WATER SHUT SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY -OFF BOX 27-001771-0 ELIZABETH T GREEN S1/2 OF LOTS 8,9& 1.00 $757.98 $507.00 $1,264.98 715 SPENCER ST. 10 BLOCK 103 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001772-0 LEO A&AURELIA HOEN N 1/2 OF LOT 4 0.00 $0.00 $546.00 $546.00 827 SPENCER ST. BLOCK 104 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001773-0 OLIVER V WITTENBERG PART OF S1/2 OF 1 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 845 SPENCER ST. BLOCK 104 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001774-0 LAVERNE J KOTSMITH PART OF S1/2 OF 1 0.00 $0.00 $533.00 $533.00 839 S. SPENCER ST. BLOCK 104 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001775-0 DAVID 0 DEDEKER S 1/2 OF LOTS 9&10 0.75 $568.49 $520.00 $1,088.49 815 S. SPENCER BLOCK 104 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001776-0 JERRY E ENGLAND N 71' OF LOTS 7&10 0.75 $568.49 $520.00 $1,088.49 805 S.SPENCER BLOCK 104 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001779-0 PETER E SULLIVAN&WIFE N 71'OF LOTS 4-5 1.00 $757.98 $533.00 $1,290.98 826 S.SPENCER BLOCK 105 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001780-0 HILLARD&MURIEL BACHMANN S 71'OF LOTS 4-5 1.00 $757.98 $570.00 $1,327.98 836 S.SPENCER ST. BLOCK 105 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY OCTOBER 3, 1994 SPENCER STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL (1ST AVE. TO SHAKOPEE AVE. -EXCEPT FROM 3RD AVE. TO 4TH AVE.) t AMOUNTITO BE ASSESSED FOR STREET PORTION=$64428.71 LEGAL NUMBER STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT SERVICE ASSESSMENT 27-001781-0 FRANCES E BOHLINGER S 71'OF LOTS 6-71.00 $757.98 $546.00 $1,303.98 814 SPENCER ST. BLOCK 105 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001782-0 RUSSELL COYER N 71'OF LOTS 6-7 1.00 $757.98 $559.00 $1,316.98 336 E.8TH AVE. BLOCK 105 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001783-0 VALENTINE G PINK&WIFE E 50'OF LOT 8 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 324 E.8TH AVE. BLOCK 105 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-010001-0 LEROY M STOCKER&WIFE LOT 1 BLOCK 298 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 508 E.7TH AVE. WERMERSKIRCHEN'S' SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 2ND ADDN. 27-010002-0 JOEL A.&KERRI R. KABES LOT 2 BLOCK 298 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 513 E.7TH AVE. WERMERSKIRCHEN'S SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 2ND ADDN. 27-010006-0 HAROLD G CASTLE&WIFE LOT 1 BLOCK 299 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 507 E.7TH AVE. WERMERSKIRCHEN'S SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 2ND ADDN. i' 27-010015-0 LORIN B PULKRABEK W 60'OF LOT 9- 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 506 E.6T1-1 AVE. BLOCK 299 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 WERMERSKIRCHEN'S 2ND ADDN. 27-010018-0 KORY BEIREIS LOT 1,BLK.300 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 507 E.6TH AVE. WERMERSKIRCHEN'S SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 2ND ADDN. 27-023008-0 MARK L&KARI S HOUSER LOT 5(EX. E 20') 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 417 SHAKOPEE AVE. E. , &LOT 6 BLOCK 2 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 CLETUS LINK ADDN. 27-901017-0 HARRIETTE J STEIN P/O SE1/4 SE1/4 BEG SE COR 1.00 $757.98 $455.00 $1,212.98 852 S.SPENCER ST. BLOCK 105 S 125.5',W 152.6' SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 N 98.7',E 150'TO BEG SECT 1 T 115 R23 27-901020-0 MYRON C&GLORIA A ASPER COM 48.4'W SE COR N 150', 1.00 $757.98 $495.00 $1,252.98 335 SHAKOPEE AVE E. W 47.5',S 147.4', E 75'TO SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 BEG IN SE1/4 SE1/4 SECT 1 T 115 R23 27-901028-0 JOHN E&JANICE A PLOOF P/O SE1/4 SE1/4 COM 183.4' 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 319 SHAKOPEE AVE. E. W OF E LINE,N 147.4',W 60' SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 S 147.4',E 60'TO BEG SECT 1 T 115 R23 27-901029-0 STEVEN A KERBER P/O SE1/4 SE1/4 BEG 123.4' 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 327 SHAKOPEE AVE. E. W OF E LINE SE1/4 SE1/4, SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 N 147.4',W60',S 147.4' E60'TOBEG SECT 1 T 115 R23 27-906071-0 OLIVER V WITTENBERG 21/100 A. IN SW1/4,SW1/4 1.00 $757.98 $546.00 $1,303.98 845 SPENCER ST. SECT 6 T115 R22 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 OCTOBER 3, 1994 SPENCER STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL . (1ST AVE. TO SHAKOPEE AVE. - EXCEPT FROM 3RD AVE. TO,4TH AVE.) AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FOR STREET PORTION=$64428.71 , LEGAL NUMBER STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT SERVICE ASSESSMENT 27-906072-0 LAVERNE J KOTSMITH P/O SW1/4 SW1/4 BEG 316.55' 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 839 S.SPENCER ST. • N OF INTERS OF SPENCER AND SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SHAKOPEE AVE,NW 60.15',NE 34.4',E 130',S 45',SW 154.4'TO BEG. SECT 6 T115 R22 27-906076-0 DAVID O. DEDEKER P/O SW1/4 SW1/4 STARTING SE 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 815 S.SPENCER ST. COR OF LOT 10 E 57.9',N SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 72.1',W.57.9',S 72.1'TO BEG SECT 6 T115 R22 27-906077-0 LEO A&AURELIA HOEN 115.8'x72.1'IN SW1/4 SW1/4 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 827 SPENCER ST. SECT 6 T115 R22 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 27-906079-0 MARK E GRUETZMACHER 36/100 A.IN SE1/4 SE1/4 1.00 $757.98 $690.00 $1,447.98 1026 S.SCOTT STREET SECT 1 T115 R23& SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 .33 A.IN SW1/4SW1/4 EX.03 A SECT 6 T115 R22 27-906082-0 MARK P.&KELLI M.JOHNSON P/O SW1/4 SW1/4 BEG 57.9' E 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 512 E.8TH AVE. OF NE COR BLK 104,E 57.9', SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 S 144.2',W 57.9',N 144.2', TO BEG SECT 6 T115 R22 , 27-906085-0 CHERYL J HABECK P/O SW1/4 SW1/4 BEG ON S 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 522 E 8TH AVE. LINE 8TH ST, 115.8' E OF NE SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 COR BLK 104,E 57.9',S 144.2',W 57.9',N144.2'TO BEG SECT 6 T115 R22 27-906087-0 JERRY ENGLAND 72.1'x57.87' IN SW1/4 SW1/4 0.50 $378.99 $0.00 $378.99 805 SPENCER STREET STARTING NE COR OF BLK 104 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SECT 6 T115 R22 27-906088-0 FRANCES M SPIELMAN P/O SW1/4 SW1/4 BEG 57.87' 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 511 E.8TH AVE. E OF SE COR 2 BLK 103,E SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 57.87',N 142.9',W 57.87', S143.5'TOBEG SECT 6 T115 R22 27-906090-0 PAUL SCMIDT&WIFE P/O SW1/4 SW1/4 BEG SE COR 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 503 E.8TH AVE. LOT 2 BLK 103,E 57.87',N SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 143.5',W 57.87',S 144.2' TO BEG SECT 6 T115 R22 27-906106-0 WALLACE G&GENEVIEVE BASTIAN 33/100 A. IN SW1/4 SW1/4 EX 1.00 $757.98 $39.00 $796.98 869 SPENCER ST. N 55'THEREOF SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SECT 6 T115 R22 27-906107-0 WALLACE G&GENEVIEVE BASTIAN 14/100 A.IN SW1/4 SW1/4 1.00 $757.98 $0.00 $757.98 869 SPENCER ST. BEING TH N 55'OF DESC 109 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 SECT 6 T115 R22 TOTALS= 85.00 $64,428.71 $18,919.50 $83,348.21 COST PER LOT= $757.98 OCTOBER 3, 1994 REVISED 10/26/94 8TH AVENUE ASSESSMENT ROLL . ATWOOD STREET TO SPENCER STREET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FOR STREET PORTION s$27,403.90 LEGAL FRONT STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# < OWNER DESCRIPTION FOOT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 27-001723-0 Harriet M Pink S 71'of Lots 1 &02 120.00 $383.73 $0.00 $383.73 ••• 735 Atwood Street Block 98 .. USE 71' Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee PlatFOR ASSESS. 27-001725-0 James W Kralik Lot 3 Block 98 60.00 $793.89 $52.00 $845.89 223 W.8th Avenue Shakopee Plat - Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-001726-0 Norman R&Anita A Stevens Lot 4 Block 98 60.00 $793.89 $52.00 $845.89 213 W.8th Avenue Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-001727-0 St.Johns Evangelical Luth. Lot 5 Block 98. 60.00 $793.89 $0.00 $793.89 119 W. 8th Avenue Shakopee Nat, Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-001733-0 St.Johns Evangelical Luth. Lots 1 &2 Block 99 120.00 $1,587.79 $0.00 $1,587.79 119 W.8th Avenue Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-001734-0 St.Johns Evangelical Luth. Lots 3-4-5 Block 99 180.00 $2,381.68 $0.00 $2,381.68 119 W.8th Avenue Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 ' 27-001741-0 Julie D Bjelland S 1/2 of Lots 1 &2 120.00 $939.44 $0.00 $939.44 735 S.Holmes Street Block 100 USE 71' Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR ASSESS. 27-001742-0 Steven Menke Lot 3 Block 100 60.00 $793.89 $645.00 $1,438.89 121 E. 8th Avenue Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-001744-0 Robert H&Sharon L Navarre S 1/2 of Lots 4&5 120.00 $469.72 $0.00 $469.72 736 S.Lewis Street Block 100 USE 71' Shakopee;Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR ASSESS. 27-001751-0 Isabel E Beckrich S 66' of Lots 1 &2 120.00 $436.64 $0.00 $436.64 735 S.Lewis Street Block 101 USE 66' Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR ASSESS. 27-001751-1 Isabel E Beckrich W 40'of Lot 3 40 $529.26 $0.00 $529.26 735 S. Lewis Street Block 101 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 27-001752-0 Arthur P&Ardis C Hoen E 20' of 3&All of 4 80.00 $1,058.53 $442.00 $3,337.53 227 E. 8th Avenue Block 101 $1,837.00 50%SEWER Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat MAIN 27-001753-0 Charles H Lonto Lot 5 Block 101 60.00 $793.89 $0.00 $793.89 736 Sommerville Street Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-001758-0 Tammy Jo Mason S 71' of Lots 1 &2 120.00 $939.44 $0.00 $939.44 735 Sommerville Street Block 102 USE 71' Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR ASSESS. 27-001760-0 Cynthia Erickson Lot 3 Block 102 60.00 $584.82 $26.00 $610.82 ••• 21482 Park Blvd. Shakopee Plat Jordan,Mn. 55352 27-001761-0 Jack A&Venetta M Anderson S 71' of Lots 4&5 120.00 $939.44 $0.00 $939.44 1 13550 Townline Avenue Block 102 USE 71' Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR ASSESS. OCTOBER 3, 1994 REVISED 10/26/94 871.1-1 AVENUE ASSESSMENT ROLL . • ATWOOD STREET TO SPENCER STREET , AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FOR STREET PORTION-$27,403.90 ' LEGAL FRONT STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# OWNER DESCRIPTION FOOT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 27-001782-0 Russell Coyer N 1/2 of Lots 6&7 120.00 $939.44 $0.00 $939.44 336 E.8th Avenue Block 105 USE 71' Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR ASSESS. 27-001783-0 Valentine G Pink&Wife E 50'of Lot 8 50.00 $661.58 $520.00 $1,181.58 324 E.8th Avenue Block 105 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat • 27-001784-0 Mary Dixon W 10'of 8&N 82'of 9 70.00 $926.21 $767.00 $1,693.21 314 E.8th Avenue Block 105 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 27-001786-0 Patrick J. &Mary B. Fleming Part of Lot 10 60.00 $793.89 $0.00 $793.89 807 Sommerville Street Block 105 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat , 27-001791-0 Gary R&Jean M Deschane N 75'of Lots 6&7&N 142.00 $992.37 $0.00 $992.37 804 Sommerville Street 75'of E 22' of Lot 8 USE 75' Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Block 106 Ex S 6"Thereof FOR ASSESS. Shakopee Plat 27-001793-0 Roger W. &Vicky J. Knudson E 16'of W 38' Lot 8 16.00 $211.71 $0.00 $211.71 821 S.Lewis Street Block 106 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 27-001795-0 Robert B Rademacher&Wife N 90' of W 22'of 8& , 142.00 $595.42 $0.00 $595.42 809 S.Lewis Street N 90'of Lots 9&10 USE 90' Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Block 106 FOR ASSESS. Shakopee Plat 27-001803-0 Ralph L&Barbara L Johnston N 71' of Lots 6&7 120.00 $335.39 $0.00 $335.39 ••' 804 S.Lewis Street Block 107 USE 71' Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR ASSESS. 27-001805-0 Steven H&Jane M Clay Lot 8 Block 107 60.00 $485.04 $645.00 $1,130.04 ••' 120 E.8th Avenue Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-001806-0 B F Pearson&Wife N 71'of Lots 9&10 120.00 $939.44 $0.00 $939.44 805 S. Holmes Street Block 107 USE 71' Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR ASSESS. 27-001813-0 Daniel Fehring N 54' of 6&N 54' of E 100.00 $293.72 $0.00 $293.72 ••• 806 S. Holmes Street 40' of 7 Block 108 USE 54' Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR ASSESS. 27-001815-0 Melvin H&Donna M Hennen Lot 8&W 20' of N 100' 80.00 $941.74 $520.00 $1,461.74 ••• 120 W. 8th Avenue of Lot 7 Block 108 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 27-001816-0 John T Otto&Bartholomew, Lot 9 Block 108 60.00 $631.85 $630.00 $1,261.85 ••• Virgina C. Shakopee Plat 130 W.8th Avenue Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-001817-0 Linda C Hegreberg Lot 10 Block 108 60.00 $793.89 $546.00 $1,339.89 132 W. 8th Avenue Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 27-001818-0 Patrick M&Annette C Glynn E 45' of Lot 6 Block 109 45.00 $504.95 $455.00 $959.95 ••• 204 W. 8th Avenue Shakopee Plat Shakopee,Mn. 55379 OCTOBER 3, 1994 REVISED 10/26/94 8TH AVENUE ASSESSMENT ROLL • ATWOOD STREET TO SPENCER STREET,, AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FOR STREET PORTION-$27,403.90 LEGAL FRONT STREET SEWER TOTAL PID# OWNER DESCRIPTION FOOT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 27-001819-0 Brad P Anderson W 15'of 6&E 35'of 7 50.00 $545.84 $494.00 $1,039.84 ••• 210 W.8th Avenue Block 109 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee plat 27-001820-0 John E.&Rochelle C. Bauman W 25' of 7&E 30' of 8 55.00 $606.70 $507.00 $1,113.70 ••• 218 W.8th Avenue Block 109 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 27-001821-0 Leslie A.&Elaine M.Schultz W 1/2 of 8&All of 9 90.00 $1,190.84 $494.00 $1,684.84 228 W.8th Avenue Block 109 Shakopee,Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 27-001822-0 Clair E&Virgina Sheffer Lot 10 Block 109 60.00 $793.89 $0.00 $793.89 Shakoped Plat S.Atwood Street � 815S t P Shakopee,Mn. 55379 See Also Desc.#14A TOTALS= 3000.00 $27,403.90 $8,632.00 $36,035.90 COST PER FRONT FOOT= $13.23 • INCLUDES CREDIT FOR SIDEWALK INSTALLED IN 1992 SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT PROGRAM October 31 , 1994 We object to the proposed total cost assessed to parcel# 27- 001577-0 located at 537 S . Spencer Street , Shakopee, Minnesota . 1) We were assured by Jeff Swenson, City of Shakopee, that total assessments would be no more than $1, 200 .00 . Therefore, we have budgeted this amount to cover a $1 , 200 .00 assessment . 2) There was extensive damage done to our driveway: Several skid loader marks cover the entire driveway and we were told by Jeff Swenson, City of Shakopee, that it would be fixed. After several phone calls , to this day absolutely nothing has been done about it . Not only the boulevard, (the part the city owns) , is damaged, but our personal property (the sidewalk to our garage) , money that we paid outright to finish our driveway in concrete looks awful . Again there are several skid loader marks , • etc . all over the driveway. We feel that a dollar compensation is in order for the extensive damage done to our personal property. 3) City of Shakopee was responsible for the 1st 30 days of watering the sod after it was laid. If we would not have watered our sod ourselves , within this 30 day period, there would have been extensive damage. We took our own personal time , effort , and water expense to do this . After the above stated complaints , we feel $1, 200 .00 is a fair assessment for the damage , time, and labor we have endured. :71-% dav Received b Ai. I.9A 6Q/7 Date / - 3/ - / 3/ "/ /`3 a) MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Huber Park Development DATE: October 25, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Earlier this year the City Council authorized the hiring of Brauer and Associates to complete a conceptual design plan for Huber Park. The consultant has completed three separate conceptual design scenarios for the park which have been reviewed by the Community Development Commission and the Park & Recreation Advisory Board. It would be appropriate at this time to review the CDC and Park Boards recommendations in terms of design concepts and provide direction to the consultant accordingly. BACKGROUND: Over the past 30 days, the CDC and Park Board have reviewed the three conceptual design plans as prepared by the consultant. Both committees have reached consensus with respect to the design considerations to be incorporated into a final design plan. They are as follows: 1. The old Highway 169 bridge should be retained and developed at it's current height into a linear park and gathering area. The consultant should also look at the feasibility of constructing a second level on the bridge that could be used for the bicycle/pedestrian trail and for fishing. On the north end of the bridge, a significant entry monument should be constructed. 2 . The City should try and locate ponding facilities in the design to control run off into the Minnesota River; improve aesthetics (both from the land and river) ; eliminate some of the blighted drainage outlets; and pursue the possibility of obtaining grant funds for pollution reduction projects. 3 . The location of the boat landing should be relocated to the east end of the park in order to maximize the functional park area. The landing should be recessed so that the boaters will not have to contend with the rivers current during launching. The staging area should also be large enough to minimize congestion. 4 . Demolition of all or a portion of the old park & recreation building should be investigated. The design should look at constructing a building at the same site that can be leased to a private business person for the rental of recreation equipment. The City should try to coordinate this project with SPUC since the facilities currently include electrical substation equipment. 5. A curved ramp structure should be constructed on the west end of the old Highway 169 bridge that allows pedestrian/bicycle traffic to move between the DNR trail/lower level of the bridge, Levee Drive, the City parking lot, and the upper level of the bridge. 6. Critical entry points should be visually enhanced as shown on the design plans. 7 . An attempt should be still made to redevelop Blocks 3 and 4 with a significant commercial development project. 8. The park design should allow for the possible future extension of Levee Drive to connect with Bluff Avenue. The three alternative design schemes will be available for review at the Council meeting. If Council concurs with these design considerations, it would be appropriate to direct the consultant to incorporate them into the final design plan. The consultant would then prepare a final plan design and cost estimates which would be presented upon completion to City Council for review and comment. The completion of this plan will be useful to us in preparing grant applications for funding improvements in this park. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the design components as recommended by the CDC and Park Board and direct the consultant to incorporate them into a final design plan. 2 . Amend the design components and direct the consultant accordingly. 3 . Table action pending further information from staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to approve the design components as recommended by the CDC and Park Board and direct the consultant to incorporate them into a final design plan for Huber Park. BAS/tiv MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer SUBJECT: Downtown Alleys Consultant Contract DATE: November 1, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Staff is seeking permission to amend the consultant contract for the Downtown Alleys Project No. 1993-9. BACKGROUND: On June 1, 1993 the City Council of the City of Shakopee authorized utilizing HDR Engineering to design the electrical portion of the Downtown Alleys Project. The existing contract is for a design fee not-to-exceed $55,000.00. Over the past six months, staff and HDR Engineering have been working to redesign portions of the project with the goal of reducing the overall project cost. The redesign(which is preliminary at this time) will reduce the estimated project costs by $113,000.00. During this same time period, a preliminary design for Block 21 was also completed. As of the September billing, the design charges from HDR Engineering total $54,298.51. This leaves $701.49 to complete the redesign, design Block 21,revise the plans and specifications, and prepare bid documents. Attached is correspondence from the project engineer from HDR Engineering regarding engineering costs to complete the project. The total cost to complete the project is $34,552.00. This cost includes $3,052.00 for work performed during the month of September. This contract amendment would set the total design fees at a not-to-exceed figure of$89,552.00 (including the original $55,000.00) This design fee represents 12% of the construction costs for the electrical portion of the project. The feasibility report for this project estimated the construction costs at $312,000.00. The bid received last April totaled $917,319.82. The current cost estimate (including Block 21) is $771,250.00. This project has increased in scope significantly since the original design was ordered. For comparison sake, the original design fees constituted 20% of the electrical portion of the project. Staff feels that the increase in the scope of the project, the additional cost to redesign (which reduced the project cost significantly), and the addition of Block 21 warrants an amendment to the current design contract. The anticipated completion date for the plans and specifications is December 20, 1994. This would allow for a January - February bid opening and construction commencing as soon as the frost is out. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the appropriate City officials to amend the existing contract with HDR Engineering to include a not-to-exceed design fee of$89,552.00. 2. Direct staff to obtain proposals from other consultants to complete the project. 3. Reject the proposal from HDR Engineering and authorize payment in the amount of $2,350.51 to cover work done to date in excess of the original contract. 4. Table for more information from staff. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend Alternative No. 1. Alternative No. 2 would provide the City an opportunity to compare between several consultants. However, a request for proposal, reviewing qualifications and soliciting a new consultant (a process required by Shakopee Public Utilities) would take several months and possibly delay the project. Even without obtaining other quotes, there is no guarantee of getting lower prices. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to authorize the appropriate City officials to amend the existing contract with HDR Engineering to include a not-to-exceed design fee of$89,552.00. DMN/pmp CONSULTANT 'October 26, 1994 arPoitimpq Mr. David NummerOp City of Shakopee /9t OCT 129 Holmes Street South 7 1994 Shakopee, Minnesota 55379C Re: Shakopee Downtown Alley Conversion Cost-to-Cotnplete Estimate • HDR Project 03650-014-164 Dear Dave: This letter describes our understanding of the scope for engineering services based on our meeting of October 25, 1x994. The engineering can be broken down into two parts, completion of specifications and drawings and engineering support during bidding and construction. The following is a detailed summary of each part: Completion of Specifications and Drawings 1. This task will include meeting with SPUC to clearly define what labor and material they are going to provide and what is to be supplied by the contractor. We will also discuss and develop drawings to show typical installation details of transformers and secondary connection cabinets. 2. Redo exiting underground drawings showing new duct and cable layout. Existing background is to be used. Add work for Blk 21 and Blk 20. Confirm with City, lighting requirements in underground area. Design to be based on proposed right-of-way drawings which have been provided. 3. Revise existing written specification to correct for change of scope, coordination, bid tab sheets, etc. 4. Final specification and drawing review with City and SPUC prior to City putting together complete package. The above scope-of-services are based on the following: Utility coordination is to be by others Construction management and daily inspection by others Right-of-way and existing conduit locations are obtained by November 10, 1994 No assistance will be provided during the public hearing process or on the questions of service/voltage conversion As built drawings will be done by others Review drawings and specifications will be available about December 6th. City and SPUC to have one week to review; final drawings and specifications to be done about December 20, 1994. The above schedule is based on a notice to proceed received by November 4, 1994. HDR Engineering, Inc. 300 Parkdale 1 Bldg. Telephone 5401 Gamble Drive 612 591-5400 Minneapolis, MN 55416-1518 • For the above scope-of-services we are pleased to provide you with a not-to-exceed price without prior authorization price of$26,000. This amount is basedton the following estimates of labor: Senior Engineer 119 hr Senior Engineer, QC 13 hr Designer 164 hr Clerical 22 hr Attached is a sheet showing our hourly rates and expenses. Engineering Support To include answering questions during bidding, bid evaluation and shop drawing review, engineering support during construction and three(3) site visits. At this time we have no way to accurately predict the exact number of engineering hours it will take to perform the above task, therefore we propose this work be done on a time and expense basis. Senior Engineer 60 hr(est.) Based on the estimated number of hours and an estimate of the expenses, we propose a budget of $5,500 for the engineering support task. You asked me to add our October invoice(for work done in September)to this letter. Attached is a copy of this invoice and the backup letter you requested. Therefore the total engineering effort from September 1, 1994 to the completion of the project is: Completion of Specifications and Drawings $26,000 Engineering Support $ 5,500 October Invoice $ 3,052 Total $34,552 If you have any questions or comments please contact me. Sincerely yours, HDR Engineering, Inc. .14/ 71(c7 Pete Malamen, P.E. Project Manager cc: Mr. Lou VanHout, SPUC CONSENT /4/ Jo MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Pawnbroker's Employee License DATE: October 27, 1994 INTRODUCTION: The City has received an application for an employee license from an applicant desiring to work in a pawnshop licensed in the City of Shakopee. BACKGROUND: Mark Allen Saurer has submitted an application for an employee license to work at Shakopee Pawn & Cash Company, 1147 Canterbury Road. On June 7th, City Council approved a pawnshop license for Shakopee Pawn & Cash Company and approved employee licenses for employees. Mr. Marzario wishes to add an additional employee. The Police Department has conducted the customary background investigation on Mark Allen Saurer. The investigation disclosed nothing to prohibit the issuance of an employee license to Mr. Saurer. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Grant a license. 2 . Deny a license. 3 . Table for additional information. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the application and grant a Pawnbroker's Employee License to Mark Allen Saurer, Shakopee Pawn & Cash Company, 1147 Canterbury Road. CONSENT • CONSENT Memo To: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator From: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director Re: Farm Lease for 1995 Date: October 25, 1994 Introduction Gene Hauer has inquired about renewal of his farm lease for 1995. Background The Hauer family has farmed the land in the north part of Memorial Park for many years. Since the City acquired the land for a park, it has leased the north part to the Hauer family for continued farming. A few years ago, the City checked around for other interested farmers and found none. There are no current City plans to use the area being farmed. A lease form has been sent to Gene Hauer for his signature and it is to be returned for City official's signatures. Mr. Hauer pays the taxes on the land and $250-$500 in rent depending upon flooding conditions. Action Requested Move to authorize proper City officials to execute a farm lease with Gene Hauer for 1995 under the same terms as 1994. Gv:mmr FARM.LEZ iy ci MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Karen Marty, City Attorne0 DATE: November 1, 1994 RE: Murphy' s Landing Agreement BACKGROUND Murphy' s Landing desires to enter into a long-term contract with Paper Warehouse, Inc. , for a Halloween themed event . Paper Warehouse will be making a large investment in preparation for this annual event, and wants some assurance that their right to use the property will not be terminated in three years when the lease between Murphy' s Landing and the City comes up for renewal . Therefore, Paper Warehouse has asked the City to enter into a Recognition and Non-Disturbance Agreement. The Recognition and Non-Disturbance Agreement allows Paper Warehouse to remain on the site even if the lease between the City and Murphy' s Landing is terminated. It is structured to place the City in the place of Murphy' s Landing of that main lease ends. Therefore, the City must be comfortable with its potential role as landlord to Paper Warehouse. Several comments regarding this were submitted at the last City Council meeting, and excellent direction was provided to staff for making revisions to the Recognition and Non-Disturbance Agreement. Attached is the revised Recognition and Non-Disturbance Agreement . This has been reviewed and approved by the attorney for Paper Warehouse. ALTERNATIVES: 1 . Authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into the revised Recognition and Non-Disturbance Agreement. 2 . Make additional modifications to the revised Recognition and Non-Disturbance Agreement, and authorize signature of the Agreement as modified. 3 . Do not authorize signature of the revised Recognition and Non-Disturbance Agreement . RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into the revised Recognition and Non-Disturbance Agreement. RECOGNITION AND NON-DISTURBANCE AGREEMENT This Agreement, made and entered into as of the day of November, 1994, by and between the City of Shakopee (hereinafter referred to as the "lessor under the Primary Lease" or the "Primary Lessor") , Minnesota Valley Restoration Project, Inc. ,__ d/b/a Historic Murphy' s Landing (hereinafter referred to as the "lessee under the Primary Lease" or the "Landlord") and Paper Warehouse Inc. , a Minnesota corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Tenant under the Sublease" or the "Tenant") . WHEREAS, the Primary Lessor has entered into that certain lease with the lessee under the Primary Lease dated March 18, 1994, and all amendments, modifications and supplements thereto (hereinafter referred to as the "Primary Lease") for the Premises described in the attached Exhibit A (hereinafter referred to as the "demised premises under the Primary Lease") ; and WHEREAS, Landlord has subleased to Tenant a portion of the demised premises under the Primary Lease (hereinafter referred to as the "Demised Premises") pursuant to the terms of that certain Sublease Agreement dated October , 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the "Sublease") ; and WHEREAS, the Tenant under the Sublease will make a substantial investment in the improvement of the Demised Premises; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to allow for the Tenant under the Sublease to remain on the Demised Premises for a period beyond the term of the Primary Lease in the event of its termination or non-renewal prior to November 15, 2000 . NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual rights, responsibilities, and covenants herein set forth and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows, to wit : 1 . The Primary Lessee hereby consents to and recognizes the validity of the Sublease Agreement and agrees not to disturb the tenancy of the Tenant thereunder as long as the Tenant pays its rent and otherwise is not in default of the Sublease. 2 . Notwithstanding paragraph 7 of the Primary Lease, in the event of default by the lessee under the Primary Lease, or in the event the Primary Lease is terminated or not extended for any reason, the Primary Lessor hereby agrees that it shall continue to recognize the Sublease as a direct lease between the Primary Lessor and the Tenant and that the Tenant' s use, possession and enjoyment of the Demised Premises shall not be interfered with for a period of twenty-five (25) years from the date hereof, so long as no default exists under the Sublease. However, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the right of a Landlord under Article 8 of the Sublease. 3 . Further, the Primary Lessor agrees that for a period of two (2) years following the termination of the Sublease that the Demised Premises will not be used for the purpose of a Halloween themed event as conducted by the Tenant on the Demised Premises. 4 . In the event that the Primary Lessor becomes the Landlord in the Sublease, the Sublease will be amended as follows : a. The first paragraph in Article 2 shall be revised to read as follows: "TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same for Tenant' s exclusive use commencing the last full weekend in September of each year and during the month of October for a term of twenty-five (25) years commencing at 1:00 a.m. on Saturday, September 23, 1995, and at 1 : 00 a.m on the Saturday of the last full weekend in September in each year thereafter during the term hereof, subject to the provisions governing early termination contained in Article 8 . " b. The following paragraph will be added to Article 6 : "Tenant shall submit to Landlord, not less than thirty (30) days prior to opening for business on the Demised Premises each year, a safety plan which will include Tenant' s provisions for fire, flame retardant, security, and first aid. Such plan must be approved by the Landlord prior to the Tenant opening for business each year, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. " c. In Article 8, after the term "right" , the phrase "for any reason" shall be inserted. d. In Article 9, the following language shall be added: "For utilities being used by and billed to Landlord, Landlord shall pay the utility and then bill Tenant for services provided to Tenant . For other services, Tenant shall pay all costs directly to the provider of said services . In the event Tenant shall fail to pay its bill to a service provider under this paragraph, Landlord may pay such bill, and Tenant shall promptly reimburse Landlord for such payment . Tenant shall pay all bills to Landlord within 30 days after written notice to pay. Tenant shall not permit the discontinuance or termination of any services to the Demised Premises. " e. At the end of the first paragraph of Article 10, the following language shall be inserted: "Tenant also shall remove and clean up all debris, if any, caused by its occupancy of the Demised Premises. In the event Tenant shall fail to remove its improvements and clean up the Demised Premises by November 20th of each year, Landlord may, but shall not be required to, remove and clean up the improvements and debris. Landlord shall be reimbursed promptly by Tenant for the costs of removal and clean up, and Tenant shall pay such costs within 30 days after written notice to pay. " f. The first sentence of Article 14 shall be deleted. g. The first paragraph of Article 17 shall be deleted and replaced with the following: "Tenant shall defend, indemnify, and hold Landlord harmless for any and all damage to persons or property during the time of Tenant' s exclusive use of the Demised Premises. " h. Article 24 shall be deleted. i. Article 25 (a) shall be modified to provide that notice to Landlord shall be addressed to : "City Administrator City of Shakopee City Hall 129 S. Holmes Street Shakopee, MN 55379" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE MINNESOTA VALLEY RESTORATION PROJECT, INC. By Gary Laurent, Mayor By Shirley Olson, Exec. Director By Dennis Kraft, City Admin. PAPER WAREHOUSE, INC. By Judith S. Cox, City Clerk By President [1MURPHY] .e) TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Sanitary sewer Rates For 1995 DATE: October 27, 1994 Introduction Council requested additional sample rates for sanitary sewer service following discussion at the 10/18/94 Council meeting. Background Attached is a sheet showing additional sewer rates as requested by Council. is the original memo from the 8 94 council meeting. Attached i 10 1 c g / / g MWCC calculated the total flow for 1993 for Shakopee at 916 million gallons. Staff calculated the city billed flow at 771mg. According to SPUC records, Rahr was billed for 317mg. Rahr flow was 35% of treated flow and 41% of billed flow. Data on Rahr is included to illustrate the size of the billing difference between the largest account and small residential accounts. Action Requested Discuss and give staff direction on the sanitary sewer rate structure and amount to include in the 1995 fee resolution. rt O O N O O O cC N r O O N M M r O M 0° - C1).- ) II() r w [f co L. U- 0 0 0 0 0 0 C0000000 O Oi ili ti' 00 co m O r N N CO cTt f) r 06 CO U C') r c O LL LL CO 0 0 0) 0 0 ✓ n V' OD O O O O 4 r On M o n r r N N CO Nr LO n 3 CO Cr0 OS O E LI co 0 0 0 0 0 M co V 0 O co r co 4 cA N Ch 0 c• r r N N N- U) 3 M Cr0 (15 O LL. LL co cn O O O 0 D 0 N r cv) CO O O 0 r• N n lA O O M oi �) r r N r N 11 O N n LL LJ.. M r 0 Lo r CO � 00) O O O p T M n N M r m r I� r r N 0 LO II 3 N a' � + LL tL a) 0 0v.On NI' 0 CO00) 0 0 0 CO N r r r- Co COnf� et 0 l) II r N t!) it LL M N. M St 0 0 n O O 5 r O r N CO 0 n 3 co ••. c0 r � n c0A N O C r N n w67$ 0 Tm M RS M r as N. >. 0 U CC J5 m o 5 ns ov r >Nm I To- o c al > - eis co a)+r > as a) c c m ` `v °) o o a) c os CD oL. t 00M0Wm :!(00 - c? a) •EccW00crD a) LF- NAr@N co tW m@OOtW 0 5 aa))) n3 Rf U o O Q = CCC E o J a) a) Ea F_ a = m E E aci Z fn N fA •0 7 O as as N a) O v) v) 2WMCCMJ ~ QQU TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Utility Rates DATE: October 12, 1994 Introduction This issue is brought to Council at this time because of the magnitude of the changes needed in the utility rates as a result of the expenditures projected in the CIP. Actual rate adoption will be by the annual fee resolution normally adopted in December. Background Sanitary Sewer The 1992 Metro average for residential accounts was $11.53 per month, Shakopee was at $9. 10. The 1993 Metro average was estimated at $11.88 while Shakopee was at $9.80. For 1994 Shakopee is at $11. 10. There are an estimated 3 ,700 sanitary sewer accounts currently. The flat charge per month per account is $4. 00. This generates - (3 ,700 x $4. 00 x 12 months =) $177, 600/yr. In the past, the flat charge was considered to support the fixed costs of the sewer fund (all costs except treatment charges) . Increasing the flat part of the rate impacts the residential (senior citizen) harder than the commercial accounts. One dollar per month increase equals $44,400 per year. The flow charge is currently $1.42 per 1, 000 gallons and was estimated to generate $1, 100, 000 in 1994 . Increasing this part of the rate impacts commercial accounts harder (Rahr is 25% of the flow) . One cent equals $7, 750 per year. One option mentioned is to increase sewer rates by 30% for 1995. 30% is estimated to be $381, 770. If this is to be generated by the flow charge, it would be a rate increase of $0.49 or 35% of the flow charge. The problems for the sewer fund are "non flow" financing and raising the flat rate to generate the needed funds would be a rate increase of $8.60 per month. Attached is a chart showing sample accounts and rates. One option shows putting all of the increase on the flat part of the rate and another is to put the increase all on the flow part of the rate. There are infinite options between these two. A recap of rates of surrounding cities is: Flat Rate Flow Rate Shakopee $4 . 00 $1.42 Prior Lake $0. 00 $2 . 30 Chaska $0. 00 $2. 22 Savage $4 .40 $1.75 Storm Drainage Staff is not aware of any comprehensive survey of metro storm drainage rates. The few cities that staff has knowledge of have rates in the $2 . 00 to $3 .00 per month range for a residence. Shakopee is at $1. 15 per month. The current city wide fee is estimated to generate $278, 000. Attached is a chart showing sample accounts and rates. Alternatives Sanitary Sewer Rates 1. Status Quo. 2 . A. Increase flat rate to $6.00 per month. B. Increase flat rate to $12 . 60 per month. C. Increase flat rate to some other amount. 3 . A. Increase flow rate to $1.79 per 1, 000 gallons. B. Increase flow rate to $1.91 per 1, 000 gallons. C. Increase flow rate to some other amount. Storm Drainage Rates 1. Keep city wide fee unchanged. Current rate is $10. 32 which equals an annual residential bill of $13 .76/yr. 2 . Raise city wide fee 45% to residential bill of $5. 00 per quarter. 3 . Raise city wide fee 75% to residential bill of $6. 00 per quarter. Recommendation All of the above scenarios leave both funds with a lower than recommended cash position after 5 years. The recommendation from the city auditor's is to have a cash position which is at least as much cash on hand as accumulated depreciation to provide for replacement. While the storm fund has large percentage increases shown, the dollar amounts are relatively small and the start of the new billing process (SPUC billing) will coincide with the rate increase. Many accounts will have significant dollar increases for sanitary sewer. An increase in the flat rate portion of the sewer rate will impact the majority of residential accounts more than increases in the flow part of the rate. Conversely, increases in the flow part of the rate will affect commercial account more than the flat part of the rate. Action Requested Discuss and give staff direction on the size of utility rate increases to include in the 1995 fee resolution. Jif CONSENT The normal bill list that Council usually receives is unavailable. The bill memo along with the normal bill list will be on the table Tuesday night. H rn 1 al 4.1 • G4 • U 'CI . -H 1.1 M 0 O1 0 0 0 O I alE I-4 I 1 01 1 O A 'CS 'C) 'CS 'CS b 'C) H N a! a) a) a) E a) DC O CO CO U) CO CO CO w • CO CO U) W UI CO V 0 0O 0 O X O $a )-I -4 f 4 P 3-I w 0 04 04 04 04 04 a E-I N A DG a) b b b CO CO U) CO CO U) H C) .L.) •H -H •r1 .SC .!C g aC g .SG wU •• Z 0 0 0 Uai m a) a) a) a 0 O U 0 0 0 0 0 9G I•+ E-i • (J 01 4-4 4-1 4a 4-1 4-I 4-1 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 m A A A A A A A 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 a 04 a 04 E E E E E E CA oo1 II C H -1 I-II H H 1H. H 2H I-I •H I-I I-I 000000 z z z z z z N E. 1 I-I Ct. .1J 1 0 O O CO O Ln In rn r- o In 10 O o 01 0 o O 01 \ 0 I O O O 01 to CO co to 10 O 01 0v O O N O O O N tN 01 0 O O O O m O1 to O O' 4-1 O O 4-4 O O O ri E+ 01 e 1 H r- Ln V1 N H O 10 O 01 01 •j.. HI to ri e-I r-i CO N N O el to to w ri 1 co • U 1 r- i N H Hl0 d' 1W0 a o A •n U 1 w 1 I Ea 1 1 1 VV' VV' V 1 1 V' .41 V'1 V' V' V' V' V- H 1 101 01 01 O1 01 01 01 01 O1 01 01 01 1 w• C) 1 01 rn 01 01 01 m CA rn m rn cn cn . `lam 0• I-4 n I 4-IH H H H H H H ei i r r •I r-1 H W I O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 1 ri r-1 ri r-I ri ei H H r♦ r-1 H H x w 1 1 . 1 CS U 1 a) • I A •r1 E ca 1 a w cilf'-1 11 G x • i C4 H a EEzt Ea a 3 y a) i U U U cxn b4 2 D B .4 3 . ai v Z I a) E E O O O •'-I Ii 4) V• w I .0 4 .0 w g H U U E• 4 'C) 3 1J CO '0 CA w I C) U U x CO E-1 C) C) U 0 -4-i ri E �a I a u a 4 4 O 0 rt E P b rm rx 3 >.I'CS 4d E HU0 >a> Xx U ri HHI H ri 1d Id 0 rt111J 4i a ?, iib rib 4 01 • OEHHO , - A 4 w O cn CE E-1 E.1 o a II > > > 4 oal X a co A A A •• 11 O a ri II Epic E-I (E+ A 11 w 01 H 11 UI CO In • W m E 11 ', a r-1E n C1 -C1 C) m In in • O >I n H H I-I Ln H N 01 in to r- en m . X ... 1t) it O '0 0 O O N LI) r'1 O1 N • O 0 . Pe01 a II 'J '> •. 0 .-1 M M w V1 1.C1 ri H I ri to II to 10 ' t.• N 01 0 H N t•1 w In 10 EI •II OD CO ao aD CO 01 01 01 O1 01 01 01 CI C.1 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w O II N 'N NNN N NN N N- N N .k 11 V' ' VI cN d• VI VI V sr V1 V V' iI '1 - 011000000000000 Et A a) n -- HC) 4 IIx x X X x x x x x X x x C) 3 0 n cn cn x to- Cl) Cl) to Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) H II I II _ m C aw a U TS •4 S.1 0 u a) SI I In I N I O A H N AG O W • a H Ic4 v • g W o E•I N P-I-I U 4..) b •I b °w 0.. Z 0 0> aal o o SC Sa EL U RI W r^i Z a) U a co A a a a a a a a a a a a a a 04 04 04 a a a 04 a a O H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H C 10 a) U t‘; 1111 EEIIIIIIIIIIEEEEE ' ElP3 a 4# L1 n O O O N N O O O O 10 N ep O 91N el O In O O O O e-I \moi dI 0 11 O O O O l0 O O Lel O O r N O N CO Ul N O O O O M • O 0 11 O 0 0 M CO O l0 CO N U) 0) In O N 0 H in VI O N O N El ei U 0 N VI CO el VI VI VI Ul N 01 H e-1 ri Ill '-I N e-1 Z W H II 0 Cn CO H M H H VI N 10 V' H .2 1 H N VI H i-I '` •• U 1 .*#.4.i a• .la a) 1 ^ rr`• -n U I - W 1 1 EI I 04 1 1 w V' ''' VI VI V• V' V• V. V. VI VI VI VI VI V. VI VI VI VI VI VI Ti. H I 1 O1 01 I Cil 01 01 01 01 01 al 01 01 01 01 01 01 - O1 01 CA 01 01 01 01 A W a) I \ \ --, \ \ . \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W Ua) 1 H H H r-1 H H H H H e-I H H H H H : H H H 1-IH r l 1 H XZ (CI I 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H A I \ \' .\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ H w I H H H H H H H 1-1 e-1 H i-I H H e-1 H . H H H e-I H H r-1 I U e-I H H i-I H H H H H H H H H H H i-I i-I H H rk H H Cl) II n n O II O 11 ! - H II II II 1 II II W 11 0 U' 0 U i U) 0 ,0 Ln U Z n a) a) a) A E-4 U 0 3 cn 0 VI W II .0 A .0 U) 9 El Z U U E1 Z U . H u) 01 W n U' U U H a' H r7 - \a n a w U W A H z x " w w . .in H n S.I I-I S1 4 co V) U 1-3 o 0 E a . .-1 X e21 N W U a) (1) a) 0 a' W U Z u) EI \ U a) .1.) a) a 0 U vcn a w H FC EI W z 0 z H 01 a) II RS 0 0 " Z H C) Z z 0 ,.� 0 H W ra; Cl) ccnn a) E n a) a) a) W a z U W H 1 14 al n U) m, ' U) W H W ex 0 0 a p H A Z A H w I z U x a W a A U . C) x w A 1 U I , ; I I EI o a 0 H Z Cl)W x a 0 01 >4 Z a 7i 1 0 U a Cl) a W C! a H A U W H a >' II b b b 0 \ A rW Z g a a U) z a W U x Z EE•I a rl a U > > > N a VI 01 ao a C) u u U ca) c.) . C A H 0 0 A W w . .. 11 : II II E4 FI E. i A II 4 1 vs V'o W 01 17-1II U) Cl) U) W 01 (1) 11 • • m l0 VI In ?..r :• a H 0 II A A A H N h• O 10 O 0 0 • ',-" O >'. II H H H M H U1 N l0 1-1 l0 N M m 10 O . O l0 l0 10 10 N 01- It U O 0 0 0 l0 l0 in .10 0 CO 01' 01 01 O in N 0 0 N N U1 a II > ' r. 0 H H' H El_ 0 H 0 0 N 0 H H EI H El EI rl O N U) U N O 01 0 -e-I N M VI in l0 _ N co 01 O H N 1,1 e' Ifl 10 N CC U 01 01 01 - O o O o O O o o O O r♦ i e-I r i r-I H H H e-f 1 - W 11 O O O r1 r1 rI H H H e-I e-I H H H H H - H H ,1 H .1 H O O U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N .!4 II VI dI VI V V VI dI dI VI dI dI VI. VI VI dI VI VI dI V VI V ep W C 11 II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O . O 0 0 0 0 0 0 HO .0 II = x x x x x x x x x x x. x x x x x x x x x x 0 EI U II U) fn fn CO V) Cn Cl) Cl) to U) Cl) Cl) U) U) U) Cn U) Cn co co to - U) N II - ., I II Ir 1 11 m0 u a W u • 0 N II U 11 11 I b 11 •r1 11 II J.) 11 /-I II O II w 0 a) 0 k II I 11 1 11 In 1 N N 1 11 o n n rl t` N 54 0 N w • u a ri u a v n u C4 o N w O N E N II Cl) X a) N H O i) II CI O u Utn z n O on U p/ E+ u w .-1 11 Z O n O a n 01 II ▪ 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a N H H H 1-4 H H H H H H H H 1-4 H H H H H H H H H U) N to m u t; VilliiiiiIIIIIIIIIIIEIii N II 1> III 3e a) n el •r CO o a m r In in o 0 0 o el o o s 0 0 0 0 0 \ 0 II l0 CO Ol O w r- V1 r1 CO O 0 0 O 0 10 O t•- O 0 O el 0 • O O N H C•1 N o to N 1) 01 O N r- N O N N O N O O r O E rl e N t1l CO H In I` 10 H o V' r- H I'1 rl m N r1 H t11 O u1 In w H N N r1 H V1 rn t' I el V• I1 11 ,!G II rl N •• U 11 r1 P.• O AII •n 0 N C21 1 II E1 1 I II V1 Vd1 1 V1 V1 ll V1 d1 V1 V1 s' Vs1 VVI 1 1 V1 V1 sr I, V1 V1 V1 N 01 (A 01 I N 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0) 0l of ON 01 01 01 01 1 01 01 01 Aw 0 N \ . S \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ . \ \ \ W U JJ 11 r1 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 'rl H H EH Ani H W 11 .-I H H H rl H H H H H H H H H .-1 H H H. H H H H I OH ri H H H H rl H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H x Cl) n u u U u o n ri II • 11 x 1 u II 0 Zrzi' Z Z OH to 9 1:4 0 W N .r w II w rz E E• Z . H U 01 w n to E a w w z H E1 CO 0 A NZ 4 a to a U >1 H to C4to H u w C7 0 Cil w a E U w E-1 N OE-1 w U E1 A a x H a 2 4 Z u z u to r4w WE-1N w H U 0 w w o •• N >1 CJ d a a H H w .] A E' H H 0 H O' a) u to v w 0 Ey w H C E a U) w a 0 � rt u a/ a >I 0 ran 0 1 2A 04 Z 4 w 4 0,+.' w , A 1 2 N E. a E+ > 4 H A A A 0 01 E. E to ►� I N H w IX a a .7 a • Z Z w Z vi H H I a) N a x w w w 0 Z E-1 w w H w ; .O E. Z � a0 " 4H100E44UMO al UH . � � HCJCil H 44Uas H00 • N .-1 II rl 0 • II A n V� H u w m n W 01 a) N N In CO 01 Cl. r1 a) n N el .1 N 01 •r In' 01 0 H H 0 1/40 0 w 0 • O >. u N m H 111 sr 0) N In. V. /+1 to 10 N 10 to In N 1c o In m In X 10 0 H - V. N 10to V1 In l0 .N 0 0 0 1n O t0 t-- 030 01 l0 01 10 41/1 a N H H r4 rI H r1 H N H E1 E-, H E H N N E N r1 N H , N V1 11 01 0 rl N r•1 sr In l0 I\, 00 01 0 r1 N el C In t0 N 00 01 O II H N N N N N N N N N N f11 t11 1.1 1.1 m r) M P'1 m m V• k. N H r1 H -H H - r4 H r♦ H H H H H rr H ri H H r1 H H rl O 0 u N N N N N N N S N N N N N N N N N N N N N N x N V w w a w a sr w V w w w •4. of v' a .r v1 w cr w .r >1 U N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Es al 0 0 U 1-. 0 0u) to Cl) Cl) to rn to v) Cl) rn. to CO CO CO CO CII rn u) Cl) u) CI) ti) m a) Is I ItS0 as X U • 1'i 0 a a) 1 Ln I (NI 1 O A rI N • o w • a H r.0 v ao w 0 H N cox a) H O JJ O 0 w z at o 0 X )4 H U CL GT) H U a W ,q a a a a Cu a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a O H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H Cn `; IIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEE ' l*- EI N E. I f] a 4.4 4.) I co 01 O o o O co M N O O N O 01 H O O N 01 O O O VI S I VI h 10 O O o Ln 01 Ln Ln O M Ln CO H O O H CO In O W. 0 O O I N 10 r U1 O CO H CO M N O M CO CO 01 O sr U1 O CO 10 M El H 5 I ri co to N U1 sr H VI co co o 01 l0 Ul o CT CO In M w 1.-1 A,I I H N CO M M N N H in H to N U1 U I O Ln r1 H ID N CO ` 1 A a) '4, = 1 a 0 .0 I ',we" •n U 1 w I I 0:4 1 I VI VI sr VI sr VI VI sr sM sr VI sr sr VI VI V• VI VI VI VI VI sr H I I 0\ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0) 01 01 01 I01 01 01 0) 01 01 01 01 01 M I:1 w a) Is. \ \ \ \ S \ S \ \ , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W U 1J I .-I H H H H H H H H H H H H ' H H H H H H ri H H ' z• H I I \ \ \ ' \ \ o \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ S. \ \ \ \ \ o H Gs, I H H H '-1 H H H H H H H rl H H H H H H H H H H - • I IH H H H H H r♦ H H H H H H H H H H H H H H ri x Cl) I I CO I:4 H I 0 , . It u U H U a I E. v) Z Cl) x w Tr w I Z U w a UU) 1 E4 Cl) w z \1w-1 I x w z a w W a U Shy H I Ln H I > H U H cn • a O C.) OF� H 2� - N w I U Cr) 'J 0 U I./. Ea > w O J I Z a cn 0 E l m U as 1.1 I� a z H a ZZOW o •• I H a Z H A aL >+ w a Q W a Cr) \ x H 01 (1) I 0 W 0 HH G$ U > AC a 0 H U) Cr) H U) I- pa U a) E .I E U 0 H U) w41 a El a ' Z 0 H 0 a a ca • $i Iti 1 mg `a Z x a w H wC Ix X MO w I z a 0 Ic H w 0 H U Cr. m 2 h:-'-� O F. I 04 w I I 1..4U 0 a H = O I O ' . Cr)W Z W >4 a Z Z U a I (I) I H w Cx) >4 3"'I a X m ' w,: H 0) 2 E-I o 0 0 0 M a I Z H H £ 2. X z z 0 0 04 0 a 0 Cl) co) 04 Cl) U U) w - U ,u) . a • •• r♦ I 'i 1 ! A sN H I w m I wT a) 1 10 O H N , M. • '`, ....:• a H a) I - H H H N N III .ri H • CO 0 N ri E 0 >, I CO ' H N H 10 10 10 N 0 10. In 10 10 VI 10 H In Ln In 10 M sN • td I In M M N 0 0 0 CO 01 0 V' 0 0 N U7 ri 10 10 10 0 0 0 In a I M M M M H H El m m H H H E-I w r1 in H H : H El in Ln . . N O I H N M VI - U1 10 CO 01 0 H -N M VI In 10 h CO 01 O ' .H N . E-I I dI '. VI VI sr sll - V VI VI In in in U) U1 In in U1 U1 U1 10 10 10 W U IHHHHHH H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H - O O I N• N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N x I VI V• V' sr sr VI VI VI V• V• V' V' VI VI VI sr s11 VI VI V• V' sr >4 1 0 I_ -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • til HA 4I .i. x x x x x .x x x x x x x x = X x x x x x x U H U 1 O u) O O O v) O co co co co co co co co O Cl) u) u) Cl) Cl) Cl) , ,'4' I - . I I - - w I IM I I ro0 I alwI 1 U 1 I b 1 •.I I 1 N u m o N o O o O II N aa)) f1 ' . $4 a ) u I u in i II NI II .. .. .. .. .. .. HNII "1/3 "0 w am v ACO II W N U) U) CO N W • II U) U) N N U) U) a. H II w w w w G) w V u • U 0O 0 O Wo i a a a a a a H N ll H O 11 ,4 •4 .4 .4 .N x CD W •• Z n aa)cU au) aa u) U) a) M UUUUU00O n O• pl E u 44 LI-I 4-I 4-I 4-I 4.1 x N n 0 0 0 0 0 0 E.) a n cl 14 $a 14 3./ 14 a) a) a) 7aC1) a) • VI 11 n0)) 1 H H H H H H H H •H H H H H H 00000 a 0))r� n 3� 'l.. z Z z z z ID 0 II N t+ n 2: E E E E 23�: E E I I I 2: I I I, CU 4e aJ II N 0 0 U1 CO CO 0 0 CO 0 r') N a IA 0 0 N 0 0 0 N \ g n as 0 0 N r1 10 rI U1 N 0 a PN N 0 0 In 0 0 O U1 04 O 0 II 0 ID ID a Cl N 0 CO 0 V' el 0 ID 01 0 0 N 0 0 0 N E rl g a rl m N as N M In N 0 a U1 H ID a 'd' Z N 04 n N H Cl Cl In r1 01 10 0 0 - 0 O n H co O a O 41 it tq n •P1 V II W I a E4 1 04 I n a a ' a d' ' V' V•I V' a a V a a H I a 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 Cl 01 01 01 A w w n • U1) a H H H H H H H H; H H H H H H z 0000000000000000 H A n \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ H W a H H H H H H H H H H H H H H I OH P4 HHHH H H H, H H H H H M Cl) U II u 0 u II w ) . 0 rl n ' ) 0 II 4 Z Cl)V) •1a 1) O .4 II Z H a 3 H a.) a) I.7 II H H C9 CJ w $4 1) O r 11 0 0 Z Z 4 0 3 •-I w 0 Q Z II 0 al > 1.4 1 0 H H .1 ) aw a a , A W x w E .'~ b 3 4) co b ' E at a n cn 0 CO Z a) ZZ a z 0 rt al w 34 b H 0 In H n ) C9 H H E' 0 W z x a 3 m H ' N W OH 11HU) 104.1 E d CN-' W W W X E 'a b 'd N Cw) E H o' w 11 •H °o Cl) a H a aC . z 0 >a E CD 0 0 0 U 0 w Ind w E n 3 E E H 4 a E' a ' w a D U) as > > E x a u U) I•I w ll U) 0 u1 W U) h M w In E IZ a 'Z Z Z, -;-' b H r-I H H ri H - 0 0 >' >+ >"' O O Id ro rt n3 I w n 3 I aG D C) U') 0 WW W w U) ai u 1t 4.) as X w it Ix a. ' w U W I H E+ a a 17 E O O O O O 0 a, >r n W KC D 0 a. U W I-I O E+ H H H E' H Cl a u a) Uz) EEn a) EEn En E Ex-' . g > > > > 3 Tr II H a H II 'j A a - ) V' H a W as II w as w it V' CLH w n Cl H . H H • O >1 II U1 In co ao Cl N In ID o as as m O o ' • 1IIII r1 V' 0 H r1 N ID 0 D) as Cl ID O Cl • In al n In U1 In In 111 IA H E In U1 H H ID ID N U) II r1 >d' I11 ID N CO Cl 0 H N Cl as In ID E a ID ID ID ID ID lD lD IN N Is N Is N N W CJ IIHHHHHH H H H H H H H H O 0 a N N N N N N N N N N N r N N aC a s a a a a a a a a a a a a Sr U n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I-1-1 . a x x. x x x x x x x x x x x x O O II U) U) U) Cl) U) Cl) Cl) U) Cl) U) U) U) U) to alk H Q) I b1 I ' <o O aw a X U 11 k m o N o 0 0 0 04 a) Sa i i %.0 I N Ili 'd 'd 'd b b o n H � a) a) a1 a) a) a) W • Cl) a) W co W co gg v 0 0 0 x o a a a0 a a a w o E. N N Cl) cA N a) 01 Cl] O -41).IJ •d -d -H U U C) U U U a - 0 0 0 0 a) a) a3 v a) a) UUUUUU O O U a1 El w 4-1 4-I 4-4 w w W HI 0 0 0 0 0 0 X a $4 Si Sa )i $-I I•i (1) 0) a) a) a) v m .� •� .0 .0 .0 a a a a a a a a a a Cl] H H H H H H H H H H 00000 Z Z Z Z Z Z N El h a i* JJ 0 0 o 0 d' 10 N 01 0 U1 0 0 I.0 0 0 0 W \ 0 0 0 0 0 N N H t0 to t0 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 N 0 0 0 0 01 N in Cl] t0 01 t0 0 0 10 0 0 0 t0 `l.. N 45 '4N .-I N N H N t0 t0 H N H t0 t0 W rl m a al C'' a0 .0 •n U W I E I f4 I d' d• d' d' d' d' d' e. d! d' H I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 Cl w a1 \ \ S. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W U a1 t0 10 to to to to to W to to ZZ CIS N N N N N N N N N N H A • � H Cr... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I HHHHHHIHHHH X - •• 0 U I . a) O HI 4_,4 a) co Cl) ca w Cl) 3 y w 0 .4 x x Cr) a a a )0I 0 a Z C) a0) a) 4 0 W r 3 I 1 C) Q d' w .0 .0 4 Z H A w El 4 'd 3 11 to "0 El 01 W U U U H CI) C/) Z • x C) 0 •'i H 13) \0 X H 'J 0 OS IC (1) S•I b .-I 0 to H $a 3a N W > W C. • C/) E x .di 3 CO v E W 101 ,moi 1�.1 co w 4.3 U W E 'd 'd .0 'd a) 0 0 •• 31 $1 31 W Z a D a •ri •d-I 0 0 > 0 H CO a) RS c0 Cd U 0 Z El 0 0 IO RS a) rt v E 4.) 11 1.1 CO w 4 c0 > > X x a: u W Sa Z CO CO Cl] E E+ ElEO 4U J H ri H H .-4 H .� I I I I a+ Z �Cd E-I co rtS Cd O Cd Cd Cd I a) W 'J W a El C/) 1.1 1.1 41 11 1J 41 U1 ' il Z a) 'd d W ,.a � a Z El 0 0 0 0 0 0 a >.. •.4 •.-+ -d - , Z W 0 El E El E El El 1 uUX Ew a > > > U Cu n d' 0 E E E 't ' A El El E W 01 Cr) Cl) Cl) • '''4:1--. ,;C:r O •{ H H H U`1i r) 01 N 0 u3 a' - M , a0 O H H w rn 0N to m 01 4 to a > > > H o H m r'1 .44 N co t- co 01 o H N m d' to w - E N N N m co co m OD CO OD - - C14 V H H H H H HI H H HI HI O O N N t` N N N N N N N •.X d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' >+ C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H• W . x x x x X x '.0 X = x U $ C.) Cr) c4 co Cl) co co co U) co u) CONSENT Attached is a print out showing the division budget status for 1994 based on data entered as of 10/28/94. The HRA Fund is experiencing costs that will exceed the budget as it currently stands. Costs are related to the Stans House project, TIF studies and land registration. The Assistant City Administrator will be preparing a budget amendment for these items. The General Government Building Division appears to be going over budget. Included in the attached bill list is the below listed educational reimbursement for employees. Employee Class Cost Gerald Poole Abmormal Psychology $193 . 32 Not included in the attached bill list but included in the total amount of bills shown on the agenda are the below listed subsistence reimbursements for employees. The employee(s) were away from their normal work site for a business purpose but the meal itself was not a "business purpose meal" or there was no receipt and therefore needs to be paid through payroll as taxable income. Mark McQuillan $30. 10 Marilyn Remer 5.46 Vernice Takumi 4.98 f ,- CITY OF SHAKOPEE EXPENSES BY DEPARTMENT 10/28/94 CURRENT YEAR ANNUAL MONTH TO PERCENT DEPT DEPT NAME BUDGET ACTUAL DATE EXPENDED 00 N/A 0 1,353 1,352 0 11 MAYOR & COUNCIL 67,420 2,098 41,196 61 12 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 194,060 12,759 143,223 74 13 CITY CLERK 116,690 9,417 89,334 77 15 FINANCE 278,660 15,308 221,664 80 16 LEGAL COUNSEL 185,970 11,784 125,543 68 17 PLANNING 408,130 34,893 309,170 76 18 GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 115,790 8,723 95,432 82 31 POLICE 1,389,520 94,413 1,089,919 78 32 FIRE 865,310 27,082 794,600 92 33 INSPECTION-BLDG-PLMBG-HTG 187,120 11,350 139,514 75 41 ENGINEERING 355,480 13,577 245,124 69 , 42 STREET MAINTENANCE 586,820 28,238 327,070 56 44 SHOP 185,050 7,875 163,478 88 46 PARK MAINTENANCE 307,270 18,488 254,650 83 61 POOL 150,300 5,464 142,389 95 64 RECREATION 209,380 17,449 161,140 77 91 UNALLOCATED 73,610 713 23,970 33 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 5,676,580 320,984 4,368,768 77 17 PLANNING 360,860 16,912 252,548 70 TOTAL TRANSIT 360,860 16,912 252,548 70 • 12 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 64,870 12,144 134,338 207 TOTAL HRA 64,870 12,144 134,338 207 00 N/A 785,700 0 704,265 90 TOTAL CAPITAL EQUIP REVOLVING FUND 785,700 0 704,265 90 ' ►.a P4 a a s P4 P4 ai P4 a a a- a s - P4 P4 4 H H H H H - H H H. H. H H H H H H %-1 Z co oaa i • 0 A4 N w Z ra O H .t H In .0 r` 00 O. 0 .--I N N N I a. 0 CO 00 00 CO CO a. O. a. a. O. O a. > in in in In in in in in in in in N Z .-1 .--1 N r• .-1 N e-1 '-1 '-I r-) r-1 r-1 r-1 N a. H 0 0 .-1 .-1 0 r-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. 0 0 0 N N 0 N 0 O O O O O O 00 a #f: N .0 .-1 an n M r-1 O 00 00 0 .-I O 0 O n N N N N 00 CO N N r` CO N . 1 .--1 a. i .-1 4--1 .-1 4-1 1-1 .--I .-I Co) .-1 .--I M Cr) M M M z N N N N N N N N N -Nt NI. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 N N NCV N Cl N ra N N st st Cr) N U rl r-1 .1 r-I rl I-I r-I Cr) r•1 r-1 00 CO CO N .--I U a. O. a. O. a. a. O. .-I O. O. r-1 .--1 .-1 .t Cn 44 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O w 00 W H 0 U HEl Z 4 4 d Cl) a' g 0 00 . a d W U Cl) Cl)WaC wa P4 > U X a a Cl) H 04 0 zzvi 0 - Ocn W W Cl) co 1.4 Z H0 d A Z A W H 0 Z Z W '.>+ 0 .0 W .>4 0 W Cl) W A C4 I 4 g 0 M 0 H x W Cl) 05 W o. a W I a. 44 a. POP444 H a ta W W 0 .-1 d 0 co N E-I 0 w a r=3 a a a z in , Ea U Z N .o C1) .-I W H o 0 Z H H in 0 0 c+� W H W 04 P4 0 U U W W 0 N U P4 N A A H a a 0 W W W El El N oo Cl) g Z 0 gel 0 0 0 VI V) H V U El H H c4 H UW � NIn p d d d •• z-iw t - NClCD ww wCD U .- 0 00 o0 0 .9 H AAA Z H r4 4.1 ri3 RI N 'W 0 H H 0 Cl) W 1-1oW W W W H W H Z IA U U 'WJ a' H a 0 U 41)-1 1-1 •-1 r] t/) [Oa 1 43 as CO o t/)• C 000 � w ,-3 00 U • Cl) Co 0 0 0 U a. 4 W X a Cl) o 0 o N N N CO .-I .-I • * * -X * * . -X is 4: 3c 4C # ch H 00 00 o O .t H In In In cn Mr` rN 0 0 In In 0. .O N 0 0 N N N0 0 Z O. o. in In NO co. 00 00 In In .0 .0 0 0 a. O. O. O. 0 0 0 O .0 .0 0 0 ✓ r• �0 00 00 Nin N c•9M O. O. in IA 00 00 r4 r4 C', 00C' 0000 00 0 1 .-I r-1 r. P.- r-I in .tit NN .-i r1 00 .0 .0 00 .0 .0000 N N .7' In in .-1 .-I in .0 r-i r-1 .--I CO CO N N N N 0 0 M M .-1 N r` O M b1 V>V> r., V>Cl). . . . . . V>V> • • V>V> . . . . . . C> </} . . • O 'iG .t .t an .--1 In 4-1 .-I .-1 r-1 .0 .0 .t .t .-1 N N Z U r-1 1-1 r- 4-4 N .--I r-I V>V> V>V> V>V> V> V>V> CO V>V> v>V>V> V>V> x a' U W Cl)/ CO a. O. a% a% a% o% a% a% a% a. ra .-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 H H r4 .-I r-I .-I .-I ri r-1 .-1 r-1 .-I 0 0 0 0 0 04 I;A o 0 O o 0 0 o 0 0 0 r-1 r-1 .-4 .-I r•l r-1rl r-1 r4 r-1 r4 ri r-1 r4 r-1 r-I pI r4 .-1 r-1 !>4 . . \ �� \ \ \ \ �\� • U .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t U .CO o% o% o% a% a% o% o% o. ai a% o. ON o% o. o. CO x a% oh a. o% a% o% a% o% a% a% o% o% o• a% o. x .U .-t .-1 .-I r-1 r-1 ' .-I r-I .-1 r-I 4--1 .-1 r-1 1-4 .--I 4-1 0 , O ►-a ,Z 00 a. 0 r-I N M .t 0 In . O .-4 N H CO CO a% a% a% a• a% a. a. 0 0 0 U W 0 0 O O O - 0 0 0 O .--1 r•I ra Z 0 N r• N - N l's N I+ - N - N N N N O W Ni' �t *7 .t .t .7 .t .7 �t .t .t .t 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U •U ,..a Pa a P4 P. Pa Pa 04 P4 w P4 04 P. Pa P+ Pr P4 w N- - .�ti. - H H H H H H H H H H H H H H - HH H Z d COCO Z P4 •N Z O Pa W .0 .0 O N N N H e-1 M .t .t vl v1 O. O. .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 n 00 0. O r-1 0. 0% 0% 0% ON n n 0. 0% 0% 0. 0. 0. 0% 0. 'J O vl in In v1 In 0 0 in v1 in v1 v1 CO v1 v1 v1 Z O .-4 r-1 .-1 .--1 r-1 0 0 r4 •-4 .-1 .-1 .--1 0 .--I .--I r-1 H N O 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 O .--1 O 00 00 00 00000 0. O O O 4k O n in to 0 0 0 o r-1 .-4 .-1 .-1 .-1 0 0 in 0 r4 n .-1 .--I .--1 .--1 .t .t N N N N N r4 .t .--1 r4 HM .t N N N N N N M MCel C' M N N N N z - 07 -t .t .t -4 s -t -t st st -t N -t st � O I I I I I I I I I , , , I I I I I 0 in to n .0 .--I r-1 .-1 .-1 r-I .-4 .-1 .-1 .-4 0 .--I Ncr) O n O N N .--1 .--1 v1 0.0 N .t 0% N 0--1 .t t N 00 U r4 00 .t .0 0% Ch .--I r-1 r01 .0 .--I Cr) M CO .t .t r4 4 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. O 0 0 W W Z Z C01 zH 0 co H 04 P4 ZZ 4 Z P. E-, E 04 P4 H H 44 H 04 H d D CI) 41 co U Z H coco C9 C9 H H W W W W W U E CO 0 CO H U 0-1 0-1 ZZ ZZ ZZZZZ Z ,-] Z A CO HH HE M 22222 U M P4 F4 H El W x p4 P.+ PCP, P+ P4P+ P4Pa P4 04 O o HH 43 ,14 - a,o• NNN43 NN o ce H H w P4 > 00 00 W W H E H E E 0 W g O W CD H Cl) co) 0 d. 0 W. A A H H Z Z 41 0 In 0 1-) OO O H ow .•t C.. co P, ow W W W W W 0 H 4' H .-1 0 CO ZZZZZ D4 0 0 0 A d Z 'ara00 0 0 0 00 Z ti .a it1 CV Z ..3 Z O O 0 CCD ��jj ��jj ppyj ,f4 44 Ha '.D H Z .-1 ' . W a P4 A A U U Cj �j Qj 0 4' WC� z rZ e4 C4 H H rr"�D ,t'.-.7.-11 ►►,D 'i 'J .D U H d <4 E E 0 0 0 0 0 H H , 0 .t o W >4 >4 Pa PC 00000 4.1 0 0 o. a4 P4 e4 A A w W W W W 0 0 0 0 o. co a4 Aas e...) c., 0 UUUUU U U U U r-i • C'7 El 00 00 v1v10 .00 .0 00 .104 NNN .0N .t 00 .t .7 0101 00 Z 00 IYvl Nn0 000 .--Iv1n CA 0. 0. .ION 00 NN 0000 v1 In Ci• 0 1/40 .0 CO 00 N .t n v1 0 141 IN .-1 CO 0 0 0 00 .t u1 0 0 N N 0 0 r-1 .-1 O Z 00 CO CO-V} n .0 CI .0 N .7 C') .-1 .7 .-I -1 r4 C"1 n -t In vl n n 0% 0% r4 r- 00 CO 00 N r-1 C'1 V>C') CO.r-1 .-I V}V}V>V}V>.-I .t .t N N V}V} 0>0> P," - - V}V} - V} 1 V>• V}V} V} W.V} V}V} o 4 .t .t .-1 Z 0 V}V} Cl). x W , V) W .-1 r4 r4 r4 .-1 r4 .-1 r4 r4 r-I r4 .-1 r-I r-1 r-I ,.4 ra H E O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 -4 \ \ \� \\ . \\ \\\\\ \ \ -- - PW4 A r 1 .-1 .-1 r-1 .-1 .-1 .-1 .-1 r•1 r-1 ,-1 ra r-1 .1 r-1 .1 r-1 r4 .4 .--I .--1 r-1 r4 r-1 r4 - r-1 r4 rA r-1 .-1 r-1 r-1 .--I .--I W ' \ 4 5-\ \N ss,N., \\\�� \ \ \ \ • 0 .t .7 .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t U W 0. 0.,- 0% 0. 0% 0% 0% 0. 00 0. 0% 0% 0% 0. 0. 0. 0. 43 x 0. 0% 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 07. 0. 0. 0% 0. 0. 0. 0. 0% X• C.) .--1 r4 r4 r 4 .-1 .-1 .-1 r4 r4 .-I r4 r-4 r4 .-4 .-I .-I .-1 o ,.a Z . 01 .t v1 .0 N 00 0. O .-I N . - H 0 .0 0 0 0 0 O .-1 .--1 r-I U .moi. r--I r-I r-I r-I - 0-4 - 1-1 0--1 - r-I r4 r4 Z 0 n n n n - n n n - n . n n 0 C4 .t . .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t o x O O O O O 0 O O O 0 0 U ' .a a a P a a a s a a - P4 a a a a a -4 H H H H H H H H H H -H H H H H a1 z 00 a i 0 P4 1$ U .-1 ch j H O .O .--I N C) en .t en .0 CO n n n o O co 0 O O O O O O co N 0 0 0 > .O O. N .O .0 .O %0 ,--1 '0 .D .O O .O .0 .O Z .--1 O. .t i--1 .-1 .--I r-1 0 .-I .--1 .-1 U1 .--I .-1 r4 H 0 r-I O O O O O Co O O O In O O O o a H O o 0 o Co 0 0 0 .t o 0 0 # 0 0 o n o ' o0 0 In o O o 000 .-'1 .t r-i n .t .-1 CO In 4-4 .t C'1 4--1 ‘-4 .t .-1 .7 N9 CV CV .t CV CV CV in N N CV CV CV CV .t .t CV C'1 - .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t I I I i I I I I i I I I I I o r-1 r-1 O to .-1 C'1 in 4-1 n r-t v-I .-1 .-1 rl v-I O K1 r-1 .t 0 r-1 N CV N CV CV O .t in .t .--1 C., v-I C') CO CO Cr) .t .O .-1 .t C') 0 .0 .-1 Ni" CO d 0 O CT 0 O O O 0 O co O. 0 O O O Z a Z Q Cl) PI Z H Z H W Z W 0 N E+ >4 W E .-7 F ►-7 rH-1 E .H-1 z d H Z a E Z a a Z Al as a7 H a H H H H CO 04 04 p p A H 04 A P4 Z 0 H N g CO CO N y 0 0 E E E 0 E Cl) E Z 0 U' E 0 Cl) CH/) Z Q Z H Z Z d Z H H Z H A ca MW a 0 x P g .7 a W a w g g 0 O 0 O O W H O ,E O V) W W A W P4 a • O a a A a O' H a a as a w 0 r w ow w w Z 0 Otil o Z to W 0 0 0 0 H 0 in 0 0 Z H >4 04 04 v-I . � V)0 H W SPC. HHH w # d d dawa Z Cl)) a Cn A4 P� guts •.3 w co o - 0 H Z 0 E . 0 0 >4 0 a P4 a 0 A g 1 d y Co tCO 0 14 aw 0A 0wd OC C DCN 1 ' ww >4 04 0v) 000 r-4 w Z Z Z H W cdcd P4 P4 • d z d d d rl x w w w 0 0 0 L4 H 0 x Z >4 wry Cl) x z a �' c' �' O% a H A 0 A w w w H 44 w 0 0 0 0 ra r-+ -k '3C * ie '# * IC 9: 'k .C 9C is C'1 E en In 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O. CV .--1 M M .t .t CO CO 0 0 .T .7 co C'1 co O. Z n N 00 O0 00 00 K) .OM .0O. CO co O. O. a .t .t co en C' N 1-1 O . . • O 0 In In .t .' 0O nn 0O C'1 C'-en .-4 .-I MM NN O0 en en r-4CV000V 0 1 .--1 .-1 1-1 r-I In en .-1 .-1 CV CV 0 1-1 .-1 C'1 VI CO CO r-I .--I u1 In IN IN .-1 .t V}.O N V> .0 .0 .4' .t CO-CO. V>(I> n .t .--I C/}CO. CV CV V}C/> CO V) .-1 v-I V}C/} C/} V}V> V}V} C/ O• a4 }t/> V>C/} .-1.-I V}C? Z 0 N V}V> W x P4 0 W E Cl) W r-1 r-1 r♦ ..-I r1 r-I .-I r♦ .-I 1-1 .-I .-1 r-I r-1 .-1 H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d N \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ .s. \\\ P4 A .-I .-1 .-1 .-1 r-1 I .-I .-I .-I r-1 .-I .-I 0-1 .-1 .-1 rd r-1 r-I .-1 r♦ .-1 ri .-I r♦ .--1 r-1 .-I r-I .--I 4-1 .--I 0• w O. 0% CT 0% 0% CT CT CT 0' CT 0% O. 0% O% 0' W = O. O. CT O. O. O. O% 0% 0' O. O. 0% O. o. 0% . O 0 v-I .-1 .-1 r-I ' .-1 . r-1 r I .-1 .-I .-I r-I v-I .-I .-I .-1 0 .a ' Z CO .t en - .0 n , Co 0% O - v-I CV en .t H r-1 .-I .-1 0--1 .-I .-1 ri CV CV CV CV CV 0 '.14.- .-1 .-1 r-1 - .-I v-1 9-1 r-I r-1 r-I rV '1-1 _ 5-4 Z C.) n IN IN IN IN IN n IN IN n n N - O 14 .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .7 .t .t .t 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C7 P-3 a a a w a a a a a a a a a w -a 4 H H H H H H - H H H H-H H H H H C - 00 0 CIa i 0 a W 0 H CO O, IN IN O r-1 N M .7 1n .0 0 O o n n r-1 .a .-i r-1 0 0 o r i .--1 H .o .v .o .o .0 0 0 0 .o .o .o . 1 e I M M 9-1 . 1 CO 9-1 9-19-I .-i r-i H O O .7 4- O O O O O LG '.L' `.0 O O O O O O O O O in 0 O CO CO Cl) O O O * O O O O M n O O O O O O O O n M .7 O. .--1 M n r-1 .7 In r-I - .-1 r-I 4 N E- M CV MCV 4 4 CV CV 4' M M M M CV .- z .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 M .7 4- M .7 -7 .7 .7 -7 M I I I I . I I I i i i i I t I 0 .--1 N .--1 .--I .--1 In 9-1 r'i 9-1 M N .7 .--I r--I In U M r-i H 9-1 M 0 r-1 CV 4 4' 4 4 M .7 0 O M M M M 1-1 CO M M n r-i r-I .-i M .7 CO Q,' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W Z\ N Cl) Z El H HH H H 4 U z P-3 01 W z DDD > z Z Z W O H CO H W 04 a s a' W CO O W E-4 O a W a H W W W W E W H H Z 0 a H a Z co co co co Co Z H E+ a) H 0 a H a H W H El P4 H OA H A , aaa a H H CO \v) J CO d' d •d d U0H 0000 H. H 0 0 0 H F CO CO Z Z Z U Z Z U H H H H Z 0 a aH COC 'A Z M W CO WWCl) WW Hj H + g CO0 F' g H W W P4 O z W W p Wo W O O O O O 00' oa o a 0' w axa a 0' O H W 0 O A -7+ 0 W a' a a a a W >4 0 ZZ H U U Fl C4 Z -I0HW aF .- 0 H E-+ W 4-4-.3 A >4 � � r w CO CV W '- ` . z Z 4 W W W 4 A - ra > a s z A WA AAA 0 w pWZ .7 a Z H Z Z 0 CO 0 A rl Z Z Z O Z O. W W H 4, a A H H H H C� �j �j O. .'�". .Z"+ 'r7".+ H f 7 I7 �7 W r0i 'JG 0 '�4 M-. H .--I .--1 - -k - -�C -: * *. * 4: -3C M H nn IIn Ino i 00 00 00 00 MM MM .7O 00 nn O Z .7 .7 ' .-i r-1 9-1n00 00 00 00 00 CO CO in inlet '0 00 nn 0 1.1 0 - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - . • - C) 0 .O .O O. O, I C'M 0 In M n IN N N 0 0 CV Cs3 n N. I CV 0 0 N N N O 1 .-1 .--1 0 O .--1 Cs] 4 n n .-4 r-1 IN N M M .-4 .-1 CV N CV CO N N M M .-1 CO.4Y - 4' 4--1 4Y.-1 CO 43- .CA 4.0. CO.VY N CO. CO.CO. .--1 ra r-I M - .7 40.43. Cl). 43-CO- 43- 4Y 45.CO.4Y 4Y N CI> • • W z O U W co W r-I .-1 .--1 H .-1 r-1 .--I r-1 .-I .-1 .-1 H r-1 r-i .--i H H O O O O O O O O O 0 0 o O O O 0 4 \ \ \\ \ \ \ - \ \\\ \ \ W A .--1 'j 9-1 .-1 r-I 9-1 - .-I r-1 9--1 r♦ .--1 .--1 r4 9--1 9-1 r-1 9-49-1 r-1 .--1 .-1 r-1 e--1 9--1 9-1 9-4r-1 .--1 9-4 .--1 9-1 04 \ i \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ .W. 0 .7 .7 4 4 4 .7 4 4 4 .7 4 4 4 .7 4 0 W O, o. O. O. O. O. O. O. O, a` a. CA O. CA O. W x a, o, CA CA a, o, o, o, o, a, o. as a% a% a. LL' 0 r-1 , ra .--I r-1 9-4 9-1 .-4 .-C .--i r--1 .--i .-d .--1 r-1 9-1 0 O a .Z 1n , .0 n CO - cos O r-1 N M 4 YT . _ H N N CV N N - M M M M M M U - pl. .--1r-I .-i r-1 r-1 r-1 -r-1 .-1 .-1 e--1 9-1 0 n n n n n N N n - n - n n W .7 .7. 4 .7 4 .7 .7 .7 .7 4 4 O 0 O O O O O O 0 O O O O 0 0 - ►-7 a a a P4 a aaaaa aa04134a.4a4a a a H H ' H H H - H-H H H H H H H H H H H H H in 0 - a1 z 00 CCI a •N z 0 a w o z H N 00 0% 0 0 0 0 0 -4 .-1 .-I r-I .--I .--1 .-1 N H 0 r1 .--I in 00 .--I NNNNCs" Cs! NNNNNN N I > %0 VO 0% in '.0 '.0 %0 '.0 '.0 '.0 %0 %0 '.0 '.0 'D %0 %0 %0 M Z .--1 r1 M el rt r1 1--1 .-1 .--I r1 .-1 rl 9-1 ,.4 r-4 .-i .--1 .--1 N H O O O O O 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O O .-I .--I O 00000 0000000 O 0 % O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl O 0% .--I r1 rl cn -1 4 .-i r1 r1 00 00 co c0 CO 00 CO N r1 H M 01 N N M C. C M cn0I eh 01 M eh en M en N M zZ .7 st N N -t -t - 4' 4' -• 4' 4' - . .t .t .t .t .t .t I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 0 r1 CO 0 0 r1 i-I 0-1 N r1 .-1 CO ri .-4 rl r1 111 N r1 N U .-1 M .t .t .t N 1-1 N 4 N N rl N .--1 00 N CO N 0% U 01 .t co co '.0 ra co) r1 .t .t '.0 eh M '.0 ri .t r♦ st 4-1 4 0 0 a 0 a 0% O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O H til .1414.14.14.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 a > 00 00 0 > > > > > 0 Z 0 c4 4 4 z xxxxx A x 0 o w >4 >+ 00 14434144W414.14.114141414 •-7 w H x CO 4 4 El 000COCOV) 0000000 CO H U a (14 CO H H H H H H H . a CO .a H 1-.11-3L-3 ,-11-3 > > > > > > > .] H \ 4 w w co 44444 axxxx04x z c4 w z 0 c9 co zzzzz 434343434343430 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V) Vl V) V) CO V) U w 0 CO Z H co H H H H H A H w00 Cn \ C/1 V) C/2 U N >• >• >. >• >. >. >. 14 CO A M cn 0 U •-7 cn CO cO cn U) H H H N H H H CO w w w wwwww H-1-IHHHHH 04 w w w ad,D rs+ Ex. wwwrl .a •-ararlra .1 0 44 0 • aaaa H 0 a 0 0E- w " 000 a z CO 0 H E-1 EH CO M00 14 Z •• a 0in Z co zzzzz �a CO r1 0 H H 0 H H H H H c4 O A W 04 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 Z w Z EEEEE 0000000 0 H .N-1 > ,` 0 Z COCn 1 0 000 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 H 00 1 w H H 4 1-7 U0zUzz0 U C90C-00000 a H .t 0 w 0 0 a ZZZZZ ZZZZZZZ A ; 0% H 0 0 0 H H H H H H H H H H H H c a a Z z ZZZZZ ZZZZZZz M M .--1 * * * * is -k . * * en E-' O 00 00 00 00 0000 N9-1N04N0% Cs1 Nl's 0% G% M .--I0 00 00 Z O O O O O 01 M O O 4' 4 N a% N N N N- .0 00 N M .•4 N CO '.0 O O O 0 1•I • • • • • • • C) 0 N 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 N N N In N n N '.0 e+1 0. r1 C7 VD 0% 0% N in in O O 0 r1 en eh O O in in in in .-1 r-1 e/} in 0}4}V}CO in N N N '.0 in co-'.0 N N in in . cc> V}V} an in C_9 M 4 - r1 r1 e/} VY N N VY V}M co- in N co. 00 00 g 1. - - V}V} V}V} V}N I U> N - - O N N 00 00 Z U, ri .--1 N q} w N e/} Cd U w coEa w r1 1-1 r1 r-1 ri r1 r♦ r1 r1 rI r1 .-1 .-1 ri r1 r1 r1 r1 .--1 H H 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O C., .4 \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ \\\\\\\ \ \ 00 A r1 r1 r1 r1 r-1 r1 r1 r1 r1 r1 'I r1 r1 I-4 r-1 r1 r1 r1 r1 r-1. 1 r-1e-1r-11-4v-1 .--I r-1r-1v-1rl vs-1rl .-1 .4 v-4 .-1 v-1r1 D4 \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ # \\\\\\\ \ \ X 0 4 4 .t .t .t .t .t .t .t .t 4' s 4' 4' 4 4' 4 - - U w 0% 0% 0% 0% Oa O% Oa 0% Oa 0% 0 0% 0. 0% 0% 0` 0a 0% 0% 0A w x 0% a% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% , x U .-1 .-1 r1 i-4 .-1 .-1 ri .-1 .-4 ri .-1 .-1 .-1 .-1 r1 ra rl r♦ r1 0 - O ' Z % n 00 .a 0% o .--I N en - in H M C7 01 el .t _ 4 4' _ 4 4' 4 U .'14 .-1 .-d r1 .-1 r1 r1 rl rl .-1 rI Z 0 . N n n N N n - N n n N O w .t .t - .t .t .t - .t .t .t •41- 0 t0 Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 01 a a- a- a aa - a a, a a a a a 41 -, H . H H . H H ' H H H - 'H - H H H H % U t - - _ d 00 a a i 0 a W U H M N) 4 to .O N 00 a\ 0 H N M 0 N 0 N N N N N N M M M M > w M .--1 .O .O .O 0 .O .O .O .O .O .O Z .-1 M N .-I .-1 .-i .-I .-1 .-I ..-1 .I .-1 .--1 H O .I .-I 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 1� O O O O O O O O O O ik O O O O O O O N O O O O O .-I .--i .--i .-i M .I a% N in .-i M •.4 . I H M N M N N M M 4 u) N - N N Z 4 4 4 N 4 4 4 M .I 4 4 4 4 0 I t I I t t I I t t t t I o 00 .-1 N O .-i O .-1 u) .I .I .-4 H .--1 U M .-1 4 4 00 N .-1 O O 4 .-1 4 4 U 4 M .-I 00 .-1 4 M 00 0 .O - M .t .O d' a. O O CT 0 CI. O 0 a. 0 0 0 0 HH >w A 0 w CO w Z 2 H 04 d 04 O cn H H H o w a w >4 w 0w CO ►-a t-7 1-1a. H CO , CO . H CO x H w a a a H a a Z 0 H 0 a CO P4 a a t-] O a H a cn H 0 O O O H d Cl) .44 w d \ D CO O CO CO U O co O U O U H U 0 Z co CO CO H Z H 0 H Z 0 Z Z Z W H CO Z CO W 4 A H t-1 H H A W W U A W W x d W. O W O O H O Z 'o' W W CO W W p4 a w • A a 0 0 RS a H a a a o a U A a U >+ a o z 0 0 0 U 0 0 44 H Z , M H ti > ' 0 44 CO in H cn o � 0 U C7' M 0 H Co U .2f t-I 0 ut$ a Z H .-1 0 Z H A W >4 W t-] AW o4 0 A H H 00 U 'J = O H Cl) W H Z CO Cl) •W oG H Z O H O, 0 a N W O Z x )4 W H W CZi` D4 CO .I > O H 0 ,ki CO Z ') - CO H I - 00-1 H H '''J Z '0J" O Z 0 0 3 d U aa. Z 2 Z o a a w CO cn cn cn .-I .3C .3 •C it * is iC dC .0 .3c ". M H 00 00 00 MM NN 00 00 NN 00 0% 0% .I .-i 00 00 N 44 D Z 00 u) to o% a% u) in in to 0 0 M Min to 00 00 .I .I 0.0 00 .-I • • • • • • . . • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 00 00 .--I .4 00 00 MM NN 00 M M 00 00 00 00 a. a% 00 44 u) 0 > 44 .-41.4 44 00 00 00 00 00 O. a. NN %), Y, t!) u) 00 CT a. 00 NW- Cl)-N MM .MM NN NN .--i .-i inin N N %--1 .-4 u) u) N ' • N</> - co.co- NN 4,4. o 1�! u) In .--1 .-1 .-1 .-1 .O..O NCV --I,.-1 N N N N AA NCl> Z 0 .N N Ci U , CO W .4 .4 r-4 . ' .--1 4-1 .-1 .-1 .-I 'r-4 .-I .I .--I .-I H H 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 4 \ \ \ ,`\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Lx) A •-I .-I .-I .-I .-I .-1 .-i .-I .-I .I .--I'� .-I .-1 .I .-4 .I .--I .--1 .-I .-I .-I .I .-i .I .-I .-I M \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ • S. \ \ \ AG 0 4 4 , 4 4 .t 4 .7 .t .7 4 '4. .t 4 U W a. Ch , C o. o% a. a. a. a. oi a., a. a. W x a% a% a% a% o. o% o. o. a. a. o. o. a. A 0 .-1 .-i .-1 .-1. .-I .a .-I .--1 .--1 .-I .-I, 4-4 .4 U O 0 Z .O r A m 0 .-I N M 4 in ,•D n H .t 4 4 .7 to u) u) ut to in In u) U M H - .-1 .--1 .-1 .-1 - .I .-1 .-1 - -.I ..I .I .-I Z 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 W .7 .7 .7 .7 4 4 4 4 .7 4 4 4 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 • • /4 _ a aP4 P4 P4 . w P4 P4 _ aa . - a a a. . ^ . H H H • H - HH H H H H H H - H - z - - - - . .- N.00 Q' PS a • z O a w U H 4t v) vO 1. co O. 0 .•-1 N N M 4 CD M ch cn c+) c7 cn .t 41. 4' 4' 4' '.0 .t .0 .O VO VO VO VO VO �O %D %O %.01n �O .-1 .-1 4-1 .-•1 .-•1 .--I r-1 r-1 .--1 .-1 H O .-1 H 0 0 O 0 O O 0 O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O .-1 0 * 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 N 0 N .-•1 r', ch 4' r-1 r-I in .-1 M M N '-1 i� E N st VI N N N M M c'7 M N N 4t 1 z -t cn .1. 4- 4 .1- - N M 4 4' 4t O 0 in '.o .•1 M .-1 .-i v-4 CO .--1 N 0 u) U N 0 N 4t N -t 4' N cr) N .-I �t O U 4 co .-I 4 4 4 .0 c') 4 ,-1 C' a0 CO d a. O O 0 O O O O O. O O 0% O U W 0 cf, 14 to C4 U UH 14 14 H N W U Z W W Z 'J 0 0 H co Z H CO Z W H H x C4 Z Z A d CO 0 1-1 W 14 H .1 ►.a Cl) W W W .-1 >• W H a H H Z a a H co H H d H H a H Cl) H a a .] to to ats a H P4 A H H A CO 1-1 H H H H CO P4 H 10 COC/2 0 CO a Z CO 1C1 1-7 CD H U 0 H A H C7 C9 \ 0 A A W H co Z U V) Z Z Z C9 H Co CO A U W H d \ W H H Z V) \\ 174 d A H H 14 H H H H H CO W v-1 C4 U x a 0 a� 0. 04 P H 0 ag Cg 0 0• 0 0 >4 H w 0 0 P4 a H H Z 0 >+ '.0 z ./H W 0 U U a A in H 14 , Z co 0 PIH 0 '' CD H 4• a c4 14 0 14 H CO A a '4 4 d 0 .-1 0 14 d \ x .1 0 to 0 A Z O z CO HA Co 0 3 H E . H d d Hp�, H 0 0Z Z H U O W d ,p 4, 0 O lx) U H 14 O% 14 x Z -0 H H H A 0 ON CO CO V) CO co Cl) co CO N CO CO H H r4 • .a 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 . PI liN O% O% 0 0 0 0 0 0. N N 0 0 0 0 In In 0 CO 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 .-1 00 Co In In O 0 Vo Wo O. O% O"O O O N r` 4 O. ch .o '.o r-1 v4 u1 In 4.1 . . ✓ 0 inO O co CO .0 %0 eh C' 0 O %0 %0 '.0 '0 4 4 .-1 N O% N N 0 0 CO CO 0 1 Co In 1n N co- co-N> ch r) .-1 .-1 eh t'1 N N O. O% H .-•1 N C') M in In V>V> N LA IA N V> V>V> N N ..-1 .-I C') CI V>N V> V>V> e•) C') x o• o N V> C4 U 14 ' CO Iz1 .••1 .-1 .--1 .-1 r4 .--1 . : ,H 9--1 .-I .-I .--I 4♦ .••1 H H O O O O 0 0 O O 0 O O O 0 0 d \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ M A .-1 r•1 .--I .-•I .-1 - .-1 - .-1 - .-1 r-$1 .-I ,-I .-I .-1 ' v-$1 .1 .-1 r 1 r-1 .I .-1 4-1H . I e-1 .-1 H i W \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ D4 U 4 4 4 4 4 .t .t -7 4 4 4 4 4 U W 0% 0% a 0' 0% O% O% O. a% 0% O% O% O. 14 x a• O% 0' O% 0 O% O% 0% O% CN O. CN a' V U r-1 H .--1 H r-1 .-1 . .-1 .-1 H r-1 1 .-1 r.1 O 1.1 Z CO- . CP 0 11--1 N PI 4 in .0 ' r- co O% . 0 H in in .0 .o '.0 %0 '.0 %O -'.O %0 '.0 e0 r•- 1., b4 .-•I •.-1 .-I .--1 .- 4-1 .-•1 4-1 .-1 •.-1 •.-1 •- H .-i Z U N N 1... N N N N N N N N N N W 4 4 4 -4 4 4 4'• .t 4 4 4 4 • 4 O x 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 O U a a s P4 .Q/ a _ a a W a a a a a P4 P4 P4 - H H H H H H H . H H H H -H - H H H H 0 00 i - a • O P4 W U H in in in in in .O N 0 00 0' 0 .l N c') In 0 4 4 4 4 .7 4 I 4 4 4 in in in in Ie1 ›. .O .o .o .O .O .o e7. .O .c .O .O .O .O .O .O Z H .-i rl .-1 .--I .--1 .o .-4 .-1 .-1 .--1 .-1 .-4 .--1 00 rl H 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 O O 0 O O .--1 O 0 0 0 0 0 O .O 0 O O O O O O N O # 00000 0 O 00 0 0 0 .--I O M N .-1 .-1 .--1 c') c') .-I .-I .-1 .-I e') CO 0'. N .-1 1", 4 H N N C'4 C' N N Cr) c7 c') M M M M eh .--I 1-1 2 .7 .7 .t .7 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 N 4 O 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O .-1 .-4 .-1 .-1 .-I .-I .-1 .-1 .--I .-1 .-1 .-1 I-4 .O CV .-1 U 4 N N .i N 4 0% -1 n u1 4 N N n H n O 4 4 .O cn .7 .O .-I e'1 .4 .-1 n .--I .-I .-I O. .-I d 00000 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 41 41 43 o4 41 1-3 CII CO C) a) H H H W \ H d W W W W D i- ›. U 0 ' . 9+ Z HHH H Gi a' r4 Z 0 04 d O a .a ►-7 a W W W W W o W a H aaaHH a CO Ci) a) E 0 ]C CA H � � � HH 0 a as Cl) H C a ` H H tiCOCn0 0en Z Z 2 coo W 00 Z 0 Z O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .) 0 0 W O H CO 2 2 2 0 0 Z H H H Cl) Z, Z H A Ca A El H H HH H -4 Cl)) CA C014 4. 41 0 a H A 0 CO Cs� H H W O 0 0 H 4.1 2 ►] 0 d 1142 aaa00 a tx c404 04 E O W 0 H 0000000 0 . a as H 0 U H P4 w 00000 H H "+ W ZZZZZ Ca H H H H H0 CD I O 2 2 2 Cl) O c4 f4 >4 c4 1:4 , G+0 H* w H Z H A 4314141414 0 W W H H Cl) V) in OV) yNV) Z <4 d-I 0 Z W - D 94 W 4 1-11-10 •41-1 Cl) , D+ CO V) 0 X Cl) Z • w d d d d d El W W W W d 0 I .-i 0 E H H E E-1 1x > a s w 0 A4 Z 00 0 O A 22222 0 A 22 C9 d 0 O 2 2 4341414443 W W W z -' H r . 00 E .N-1 000 Chi 04 04 04 CO ,, . Cl) N H ^ �. 0 0 C7 0 0 'D+II D+ 9+ 'i1 2 C4 1 2 W V) 00000 yW� W W W W W 0 W A W HHEE+ HZ i.7'. 0-1 as El W 11 D 0' Z 4 H ZH2 H zZ z .. d d d 0 d W O0 H 0% A D D > > D 3 U 0 0 X .-1 , ,--1 - 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 -4C 3 3 C' H - CV N 0 00 .0 CO 0 0 Ce1 c') N 0 N 4 4 in In 0 0 .7 .7 .O .D (SI N o. O. Z .-1 CT 4 N in N 0 O 4 4 at 00 n 01 n n 0 0 n n N'CV .-I 4--1 4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • - C) O n01000 .--10 44 en in .70 .O .O O. o. O. o. nn In in c'') en .4:. %I') 0 I is. O in In eh CV 0 0 4 4 00 .D 141 .--1 .-i .0 .0 .4' 4 .-4 .-1 CV Nr. n .-1 .-I N c-I .-i a>c/> in C'1 .eh O. O. .-1 4 .O V>co. 0 0 co v> v>V> .-i .-1 N N co co N Cl> e/> V>V> V>N N V>V> V>C/5- 0• g Oa4 .-I .-I 0% 0% X 0 Cl y' v> > N>N W 0 Cl)/ W .-1 .-1 .-4 ri .4 .-I .-1 .-I .-I .--I .-1 `.o. .0 .O .0 .o H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 N N N N W d \\-\\\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 04 A 1-1 .-1 .-1 .-I .-I .-I .-I .-1 11-1 .-1 .-1 O 0 0' 0 0 .-I .-1 .V .-1 r1 • .V /-4 .a e-1 .a .-1 .I .V I-1 I rI .-1A4 \\\\\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \i \ ... 'r><i U .7 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 U W o. 0% 0% 0% er 0% o. CT o. 0% 0% 0% CT o.; 0% 0% W x o% 0% O. oh o% o% o% C% o% o% o% o. 0% o. o% CT 'S. U .-1 .-1 r1 .-i .-1 .-I H .--1 ,-4 .-1 .-I .-I .-I .-1 .-I .-1 0 - O 2 .--1 N ch 4 in .o 0 .-a CV e') 4 H n n n C• n n CO 00 .CO CO 00 0g - .--1 .-1 .--I - .d .-I . -1 1 .. .-I .-I .-1 i--1 0 - n n n n r. r. c• 1N r.• n n W .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 3 .7 .t .t .7 0 pq O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 - 0 0 0 U U • .a a a - .4 - H H O• Z 0 00 4 0 a O a w U H r•- 0 `O in '.O co H H .-1 0 N 0 4k M vo co 1-4 E .-1 M r7. N 1 'J 1 O N .-1 U r-1 t+1 4 O O z 0 H E a H t/1 Cd W C.) rs) 0 W W .-t A Ln 0 1 Z co H r- a to H r•-• W W g U$ Cl) --+ 0 a o A E •• z .N-1 >Q c.)o Cd E w' 0 c% 0 • o. a Cl) .-1 .••1 do * . c+) E 0 0 In in N z in In •0 %0 to O 0 co co %o %o to 0 1 N N vs CI> 0 .-1 r4 M O .• '+r+ Vitt N • .� 1 ' zo �n +;': Cd C) N W E Cl) W %o %.o H 0 Q \ \ A 0 0 c>a 54 \ \ 94 C.) C) 1*7 0' OT Wx a. 0% Z C.) .-1 -e-•i 0 . r7 z in uo . H co co �j0 A4 .-1 .-1 o 0 .Z 0 O C.) C) a) • 00 - cda • I in •• in in N 0' 0 co N N .-1 r1 in c'7 c0 .7 in 0% c0 o , •• .O .-I .7 0 0% N 0 an N in c7 0 in in co .7 0 • . 1 0% n CO n in 0 .7 c.i 1' .--1 in a% N .-1 , cn .7 '' 0 .-1 Cl) Vf .-1 V} V} u1 - .7 .-1 V} V} 4--1 0' V} V} . . 0% r1 C.1 1- ✓ A O W O 03 41 X Z a 01 w cf) cd n r 1 ►-a H 14 U CA W '3 1.74 Z g- r3 g g m 44 U C/) 0 E-I x o+ 0 CL W 0 .-1 .7 in 0 c0 0 0 W 0 r-1 .-1 c4 cn .7 .7 0 O .••1 .-1 .7 .7 r-- 00 1-1 1k * # # # # 1t 0z z z- zoJ 0 k. W W W W W W ly MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer AVJ SUBJECT: Westside Flow Allocation Study DATE: November 1, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Attached is a proposal from Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. for performing a study on the sewer capacity limitations for the west side of Shakopee. Staff is seeking permission to proceed with the study. BACKGROUND: In 1977, the City of Shakopee adopted an ordinance allocating maximum sanitary sewer flows for an area on the westside of Shakopee near the Shakopee Town Square Mall (see attached map). The flow limitations were established because the downstream sewer did not have enough capacity to allow for unrestricted development in the westside area. Since 1977, several infrastructure improvements in the area downstream of the westside area have increased the capacity of the sewer system, thus reducing the need for restrictions. Although these improvements have improved the situation, staff does not believe the capacity is available that would allow the restrictions to be removed. In addition to the sewer improvements,the construction of the V.I.P. Interceptor Sewer to Tahpah Park, and the subsequent extension of sewer with the current Vierling Drive Project may provide a second sewer outlet to the westside area. This second outlet point could reduce the burden on the sewer which currently serves the westside area. The focus of the study will be to determine the impacts of the sewer improvements since 1977, and the possibility of diverting flow to the V.I.P Sewer on the current flow restrictions. Staff feels that the combination of these two factors may allow for eliminating the restrictions altogether. This would allow the undeveloped lands in the westside to develop in accordance with the current R4 zoning (R3 under the new ordinance). Staff has received inquiry from developers interested in constructing multi-family housing in this area. Staff is proposing to fund the project out of the Sanitary Sewer Fund. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Accept the proposal and authorize the appropriate City officials to execute a contract with Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. for performing the Westside Flow Allocation Study for a fee not-to-exceed $7,000.00. 2. Do not accept the proposal. 3. Table the decision and direct staff to obtain other proposals for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Accept the proposal and authorize the appropriate City officials to execute a contract with Short- Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. for performing the Westside Flow Allocation Study for a fee not-to- exceed $7,000.00. DMN/pmp FLOW OCT-27-1994 14 26 FROM SEH-MPLS TO 4456718 P.02 ,sal 5909 BAKER ROAD.SUITE 590.MINNETOW KA.MN 55345 612931-9501 FAX 6?2 931-1 we ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION October 27, 1994 RE: Shakopee, Minnesota Fee Proposal West Side Flow Allocation Study $1311 No.: P-SHAK09502.00 Mr. David Nummer Staff Engineer City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee MN 55379-1376 Dear Dave: We are pleased to submit our proposal to perform a detailed study of the sanitary sewers in the "Watson area" generally lying west of County Road 15, east of Trunk Highway 169, and north of the Trunk Highway 101 Bypass. The purpose of the study is to determine if restrictions on sewer allocation need to be continued as required by City Code Section 3.21. Our proposal is based on our understanding of the project gained through review of previous materials and meetings with you.The attached Work Task Plan outlines the tasks necessary to complete the study process.Based on this work task plan, we estimate that the study will cost $6000, based on our standard hourly rates and reimbursable expenses. Unless the scope of work is changed by the City, we agree that our fee will not exceed $7000. We will proceed with the study upon receipt of your authorization to proceed.We anticipate completing the study within approximately a month of authorization,pending receipt of the remaining information necessary to complete the study. We appreciate the opportunity to provide the City of Shakopee with our proposal for this project. We will be available at your convenience to answer any questions you may have considering this submittal. Sincerely, 4‘2010,LA.,:440 Daniel R. Boxrud, P.E. Brunch Manager ymb SHORT ELLIOTT HEN RICKSON INC. ST PAUL.WI sr CLOUD.MAW CMPPEwA FALLS N? MADISON,W/ OCT-27-1994 14:27 FROM SEH-MPLS TO 4456718 P.03 West Side Flow Allocation Study Work Task Plan SEH No. SHAKO9502.00 I, Review existing information. A. September 24, 1975 "Report on West Side Sanitary Sewer Extension" prepared by Suburban Engineering. B. City Code Section 3.21, which is based on this report. C. "Existing Sanitary Sewer System Database" prepared by SEH, dated March 1994. D. Design flow data included in the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan prepared by SEH, dated July 8, 1994. II. Analyze VIP sewer extension possibilities. A. Determine possible limits of extension based on cover,route,topographic mapping,and pipe grade requirements. B. Determine the amount of land which could be diverted from Watson area to the VIP. C. Review excess capacity available in certain reaches of the VIP. D. Compute a new design flow through various reaches of the VIP assuming the additional land served is zoned R4. E. Determine the profile of surcharging during the design flow conditions for those existing reaches of the VIP (near County Road 16) which are known to be under capacity for the design flow conditions. F. Based on surcharging profile,determine possible basement impacts. III, Determine sewage generation rates for remaining Watson area , A. Based on rates in the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan or 1975 report as appropriate for single family residential. B. Obtain and review water records for other properties in this district C. Determine average and peak flow rates for developed non-single family residential parcels. IV. Meet with city staff to review. A. Confirm detailed information on the existing sewer system. B. Discuss acceptability of VIP extension. C. Confirm land to be served by the VIP. D. Confirm applicability of sewage generation rates for Watson area. V. Determine design flows for Watson area. A. Based on agreed upon generation rates and acreages. B. Route the resulting peak flows. OCT-27-1994 14:27 FROM SEH-MPLS TO 4456715 P.04 A VI. Determine impact on downstream sewers. A. Surcharging,if any. B. Need to continue flow limitations, if any. VII. Meet with staff to review results. VIII. Write report. • • TOTAL P.04 I I I ca N a a i ,,1 4. y cr 4 Mt X EQ W 1 it 1- / . at. 41 z a. >. tiw i9 i4 ,�� o.of w thJl Via' � N 3 44. 0 : . 0 . . - 1 /..1 ,940• flan-A. fry w. 11111111P011111111, 11111D1111i1 �, *ow, x � ,Dr -• (J uiiiiIiiiii M it ' �T,......„ a.... t ..-- t... ci...A111111111 A. 1•11 litall1 ifitwil a cirkNA,„ r Emir mom" • - 0 im gain , 1.410,10 _ Pgv,.....3,371 ,...,c,. r t SP* ,411111 f, I I .J ... . -••• __••, ..__. ... ��; i . • ` . J .. rl , ____-- -\.Jz.t - nfr .,- Q 4aiiipa, ....t\I V , - 1114 l. dP . vik\lm,14!11i•Wii0* i11i-R- NIliliflhl X !IIL . lM cf2Y �, rTrT 1. rTilAI Inin � Alziki , id „ . III P 0 . \ o11III11�IM111 I4Ia V . _ / r. I- oiiiiiiiP f 1 tz, s 1 N illi KtI ' , 4M UI1IUIUIL 11111111111 lij01111.1111 -1 t* rr !rwrr['i 1 IN 411 .: 101111111111. 11111111111 III E 1iiuimnmiiJ `MIS' .•.2\ 0 . k co 111111111110 in •r 0 /,„... i , - „,i:j..„„„, .i.,..lt1'ST ........1 liMiliNigini la 1 !tri (11) •,,• • 0 a r .J Q Uzi:. Z . 4, I \ 0 le NxNNNN:N. .\\N ..., ,..) . ._ W 2 . - - ).... x .., „„., , lit 0 ..., ;;• -4•,,, co W Pm › co , _ .7401:„ \ ca Q '•0i (s) ti -_ a Ln 4 46, 0 \ _ • r \ IllkNN . 4114/. , . 1 S... 111 1 111 ms' • s, \ . MI i . 1 , -41:414k \ „ •••• 1 CD . a J 1 1 16 ' I . . \,. k CONSENT ' TA MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer PiYld SUBJECT: 10th Avenue Stop Sign Warrant Study DATE: November 1, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Attached is correspondence from Mr. Don Reed, 1833 10th Avenue E., requesting stop signs on all intersections on 10th Avenue between Marschall Road and Shakopee Avenue. BACKGROUND: The request from Mr. Reed includes six intersections(Sibley,Ramsey, Swift, Miller,Merritt, and Shakopee Avenue). The attached letter sites excessive speed and vision limitations, as well as numerous accidents as the basis for the stop sign request. The warrant study evaluates the accident rate, traffic volume, and site conditions (visual limitations). Traffic speed is not effectively controlled with stop signs, so the traffic speed is not considered in the study. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Direct staff to perform stop sign warrant studies on all the intersections on 10th Avenue between Marschall Road and Shakopee Avenue. 2. Direct staff to perform stop sign warrant studies on only certain intersections. 3. Direct staff to respectfully inform Mr. Reed that the City will not perform warrant studies along 10th Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to direct staff to perform stop sign warrant studies on all intersections on 10th Avenue between Marschall Road and Shakopee Avenue. DMN/pmp STOP October 19, 1994 D � City of Shakopee �� S ''clitt Mr. Dave Nummer 2 199, Engineering Department 129 S. Holmes Street / Shakopee, MN 55379 p Dear Dave: I had an accident at the intersection of Ramsey and Tenth Avenue on 10/13/94, due to excessive speed and visual limitations at this intersection. I was moving at 20 to 25 miles per hour got stopped before the center of the intersection and still got hit by a truck which left 52 feet of skid marks. I feel all intersections between Shakopee Avenue and County Road 17 on Tenth street should have stop signs. I have lived in the same house - 1833 E. Tenth Avenue for 18 years and have seen accidents on Tenth several times. Tenth Avenue is designated as a emergency snow and pedestrian route and this length of road is the only one without stop signs at intersecting roads. I feel Tenth is the main through fair and in being such should have stop signs at all intersecting streets plus a stop sign at Shakopee Avenue on Tenth Avenue. At the intersections of Miller and Tenth, there are drainage dips. I have seen cars go airborne when they hit these due to excessive speed. Just go up there and look at the gashes in the street.. It seems as though the last few years Tenth Avenue and Shakopee Avenue have become a race track. Something is going to have to be done before a child or adult is killed on these streets. Being a dead end street used to help our neighborhood but not anymore. Government moves slow but in this case due to safety this can not be an excuse. Let's get some action before a skater, bicyclist or child is hurt or killed. erel • Don -ee 1833 E. 10th Avenue Shakopee, Mn 55379 n 1\ .g (*�eR 1�Q �� S , ri ,\ '� #VIy � TO: Mayor Laurent and Members of the City Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator Tom Steininger, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Minnesota Police Recruitment System DATE: 10 24 94 INTRODUCTION: It is the opinion and recommendation of staff that between now and December 31, 1994, it will be in the best interest of the City to terminate its membership in the Minnesota Police Recruitment System (MPRS) . This requires a resolution by Council and 30 days advance notice to the MPRS. BACKGROUND: The MPRS was formed in 1979 in response to challenges being directed at police hiring practices, most notably the physical and agility testing of applicants for employment. At that time, the Metropolitan Council received a $238, 000 Federal Grant to validate an instrument which would fairly test the knowledge, skills and abilities of applicants for police employment without discriminating against female or minority candidates. Working with the Met Council and the Metropolitan Area Management Association, approximately 36 political subdivisions in the metro area, including Shakopee, formed the MPRS. The theory behind the MPRS was that a consortium of cities pooling their resources would be more effective than the sum of its parts. Although working with other cities remains desirable, the City has been faced with escalating membership costs. The process has become too expensive for the city to continue its membership in the MPRS. A resolution by Council and 30 days notice to the MPRS are necessary to terminate membership. ALTERNATIVES: #1. Withdraw from membership in the MPRS. #2. Remain a member of the MPRS. RECOMMENDATION: Alternative #1. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution # 4118 , a resolution authorizing the City Administrator and Police Chief to terminate the City's membership in the Minnesota Police Recruitment System. /5446 RESOLUTION NO. 4118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AUTHORIZING THE WITHDRAWAL FROM MEMBERSHIP IN THE MINNESOTA POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM. WHEREAS, on January 18, 1983, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2104, authorizing participation in the Minnesota Police Recruitment System; and WHEREAS, the City now desires to withdraw from the Minnesota Police Recruitment System in order to effect a cost savings . NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: That the City of Shakopee hereby gives notice that it is withdrawing from membership in the Minnesota Police Recruitment System at the end of 1994 . Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest : City Clerk Approved as to form: 0 • 4,4 City Attorney G/ [1MEMO] 41 (4 J MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer r SUBJECT: County Road 77/Fuller Street DATE; November 1, 1994 INTRODUCTION: At their last meeting, the City Council requested an update on the status of the County Road 77/Fuller Street Project. BACKGROUND: In July of 1994, staff brought a request to the City Council to contract with Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch (SRF) to design the roadway connecting existing Fuller Street to County Road 77 (the Fuller Street realignment). This request was tabled due to the fact that a cost sharing agreement between the City and Scott County had not been finalized. The County was proposing that the City design and construct the Fuller Street realignment and turn this roadway over to the County. In return, the County would reconstruct the existing County Road 77 (Apgar Street) as a City street and turn this road over to the City. The County wishes to have County Road 77 run along Fuller Street north to 1st Avenue, where the signalized intersection is. The City Council was hesitant to accept the proposal from the County as it is not in conformance with the current Scott County cost participation agreement. Since then, Gold Nugget Development (Novak-Fleck) has submitted a concept plan for the area between Apgar and Fuller Streets. Their plan shows a large portion of the existing County Road 77 being vacated and platted into lots (see attached map). No formal submittal has been made by Gold Nugget, although staff has reviewed the concept plan and provided comments. I spoke with Brad Larson (County Engineer) this week concerning the County's position on this project. Mr. Larson stated that the County had funding to reconstruct the existing County Road 77, and that they planned to do so next spring to coincide with the Southerly Bypass construction in that area. Mr. Larson also stated that he is waiting for the City to commit to constructing the Fuller Street realignment, and that the City and County should come to an agreement on the costs. When I asked Mr. Larson what his position was in regard to the Novak- Fleck proposal, he stated he was open to the idea. Furthermore, Mr. Larson indicated that vacating the existing County Road 77 in the Novak-Fleck Development would free up funding the County had designated for reconstructing that roadway, and that their funds could be applied to the Fuller Street realignment. Staff is seeking direction on how to proceed. To this end, several alternatives have been prepared. The costs associated with each alternative will be available at the November 1st Council meeting. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Construct Fuller Street as a City project next spring (as shown in Attachment). With this alternative, the County will construct Apgar Street separately from the Fuller Street Project, and the City will be required to participate in the County project according to the existing cost share agreement. City Costs - Alternative 1 100% of Fuller Street (Assess 50% to Novak-Fleck) Cost Share on County Project Note: Alternative 1 would be equivalent to accepting the draft cost sharing agreement which was proposed by the County for this project. 2. Request that the County vacate existing County Road 77 through the Novak-Fleck parcel, and accept the Draft Cost Sharing Agreement as proposed by the County with the City constructing the Fuller Street Project as shown in Attachment No. 1. With Alternative No. 2, the City saves the cost of participating in the County project (Apgar Street). In addition, the money that the County would have spent on reconstructing Apgar Street would be used to construct Fuller Street, thus reducing the City cost for Fuller Street. City Costs - Alternative 2 100% of Fuller Street Less County Contribution Assess 50% of the Project Costs No Cost Participation as a Result of Apgar Vacation 3. Negotiate some other Cost Sharing Agreement with the County. City costs to be determined. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 2. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to request that the County vacate existing County Road 77 through the Novak-Fleck parcel and authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the Draft Cost Sharing Agreement with Scott County. .1 . , r " r ♦F�J{tsJa, 1 r , Y Ati N i Y- , ▪ t tf f yte 1 �. . f r '1 , .1. J 1 C; r`r{,':"•�n rS.r '1 ,• h / ' r ti=.rs' i, / y 4t '•t a hp:r !pot ,s) ,• I.-%-i ,. 1, y 4 0 + f�th r, I.„•. J r til. S' `S. 1 ,,'1', _ —i`• ,i, ! ''.y,:.,ri;4'�}, 4(\ +({�, + P'rr14, IYj•ti'�.��'�7i 1':-hVf rc• e,!1• ':I S1-x„i♦ ti i• 1(� t .„ 4,,71.•. �'Gt \ 1�w�Jt�- ,: • • Y . y•••::.'+' w � ' •y � n ✓ \ \0� 4 )1` qIj1,9 Lp 1.•I I . ''';11‘4"-Tr' :. C :� t.t ✓ `r0..., .i: /o^.g'I* pf, A •1• I , � a , ; !r ' .; t I i,\\C� Y•▪ tSF>. . . ,' / K �I i4 \., _ L\-1 � � .+ Y1'':f\\ 'I �4P/ yf /1 i' t 1 1 � • .L 17 . r ` . J A 1 •\ K c / ' 1.. S i • YA f1['ir„\ to k. / \ ivA, ' . a 1. r � • C �n � e W . I.1.:4 Is -'% J. ',04 /. I'i�l '1' S'\5 , /!'IN, :,}Ir , .,p .' �\:'C' Y • �. .x;� WrY 1' \ � •N ^{, t ..,• < °I�uE J fR h d "7, •d•, / \ • ,{fit �/ (R�Xf v , , • 4;:' •�, � ,, / i ,•�' .» r ';\ 1 ,' .i'. §: ; i ,/h\\ , i 0i 4�\\ `4•a'�! C{tfygi;;4',' Mr \ ••f ,> f ) t Mr , , oft:.5,!.. N . \ J� n ,'�. p ? , • �. -:•,,";'••••:"..4 vt,e -u i • \` * f G`'1''\a�.j�11 ` ,"w 4,,/ vkl.'« tr',,.: BVI` 1•, i!4 r\�,p\ AN�r�i rd .+ ./ \ oT!^ 1p ,V y I:R V \ �k 1\ �Y i1/ 11,- �./l (¢' VII, ' �� �1 Iwo,.i1 \ • ,. I 1 • '+1,\\ 4//a�1+P'* Gb� �Iy 'ti. •'�� { ' \4 .0}41 i\\ ''', i 0 V `y W , 1 .14 ! ' ♦ °¢ ( . 1.r i ;1 i ,n. \\j NU '4' \S'1 >.6 '\ �' ♦ ' ' f r !"jl V ' • /b'' s `_i$. +?, �� , 9 ,,. � •• ' `'t7r�`\t,`drf.A ''' •' 9 r;,` •'.e4 r • 1a LL r �� G ,,c17.4;',1 ✓* .�trfS ,,. \ Y �+ , r-4t v Tr .. • O f k�u t I�x;,\w �it• 4 ,.,.�. , +. ' +. , ,,."7 hy')v /1. -,:,\� :N 4, 1 \ `� �', \ N t:',..;.::,,' 1 1 1 t a,\ s 7 • ,yti:4—.1.11, , R 0./ C• \I\ i I • , ,',/ • I.• , 1,,..:2,p 1 "•;1 I `\ +rN • / ��yy \]y �. t,.,A.!� \ r h�.f t 4'C�a\\i. .%1>_, -.`V' 1, ie. '"'11 `Ariry •w�\ 4s Ir r '� .'Y A• It;•F`¢'int: ,ot � <N:1-, 'opd / /� ' �Y . �•� : Iw 7f ':4r LI- \ 4 " . ,,, rs,fiti,i,,\\ �7�/e.`�"i \\1N. ! ,� +t 1 y I Ic i }•"! s" :t$ Q; 'i++,1/,L..J,y\ y/, 44, •h{'44,.,14 .'1d' .+ �':. .; ,..1 \ �r 1, fly a r,,,al �.4 ',, 01 \// J 7.. ( !tri. '/ A\'' I , a N� Y ' //CY N�a �.\:''tts M ‹ ' M �>.'—,.-T---'/ i••. �� tai f. l. ./ 4� d ,• '\/ r / ^Id \ ` ' R� i, .Y11Fy1 4 �1fiw� <{I \��L�% tj1 �� � fAr1�t ' K� \\!}�/ ) i .n A. 1 cyte rt / \ ',;a "if ' / \\ . I • 1 ,. \\'ys^•.t4"v, , ,\ //a ,4 r . �\ i, N d \\ / �h , I, t ,.lI1 `.c'•E. . }` r4 \\yj;} • e�.▪ .Y•slt><it':1'.."'"•,....• "...;41.4.5%, ./ 'Q .r /)..,, ,\\`' ,,,,... ..„4:::,, , /..•� y ' • -, \ '' p,4:, • •e4, �,V:, �..'•11..44.4../ f.s•••••.4.4) Q'/r k• / + r`\ \, a,(`/ 1 a '• . : 1.-2 f.I IIIA$ 11 "t - ,,..,,,,N N\o+• t /t '•.,h,_t y I,� „,••,;.,;'• r /• '\ M"It �). '0 \\ '- s lh, v. r \ {�t,,4/ • . ”, i 'r i'' ., \a g ' / \\S� .T D L..�OIiI-a L., 5.. :.1.) 1.::. ,sJ19'. a•':.%• 0;It,. `'1 •i r tr� 0.0 ;' d \ J C ' o! ` ''/ ' 4+ .43 j 444"' 9! i '�F' r /., 1 lj P . s F 7,{ r-to �? r-•-�6--'1 r 71 . s i sYr ./'., <;' o.// q ^ �!`-a-.' %..‘ `-s: f 1 t '.4 r.,.... ;i l,r74l fit'-1..I Itu.,044)`,,flyyo�y, ,•/"..,▪ �I .`,r� i.„,,,,,,4,:••!.:„... . 4 /^ V ':ti\ `44 ,4P \ C%.sli• d � • , „I G• '.....g, 1 r-., '.I (Ti • In • 1' I J II3--1-144 '��r((���� iI +1.1 tio. / •--i--,,I 1 '�"•':y41 1.t . • ip4 ��,,t'„,,•,..,..• ,119v• ?, \. 1 a '/ i•1.. \\; a \\ • L u:.a J L:..a0...A LII.iOE:-}J(•••..36.':- ;Ni j,7'! �ti•.` < <'• I •N •, - k 4 '-.4441 ,1 ,i•�I!S.'�..I;,�;'X. -,,,. •.4.1-1-1-..v.y ..ei.i;+1r}rllf'll1'4IAy , `�1' A+. �. X:.�4 r. 1.l�A"• !•.J �'1 SBI. ___N ._____ n, "ti..:.0,4.,,,,4;". V,1. 3''f' '''' ... '":6.,1"'�tj,{"6 j1�'!.• .. y4 4�r,' t•R ' 'EL'LZZIf- .0 C81.V0 N c 8 01, ) LL 'ON •Otl '00 v S`•, ,t ,,, r=' .:'1.Y 'R \,.:• •I V II ,"`S u. !.-7---44,-;,,,',-. • Yik e 'b+ f..� yl t ' • �\ J. * Il .,i F. '•X11 t „ t a' Af �+r. ( , r .,I x 4• w�, r •, ' { } ,;r+t�J M ZiILNSlL.L-•Zl fV01133S 4 • , /13N Z/LS.3N11 1S3M 'a ?I I II ,C I ri ns CC, 1^1 /•� n ti1>I1v Ir t— I —.�.I . 1 nrn . n,,, e I ,A ,I\I ., i t , I t co: ENTSCL • TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Resolution Number 4109 DATE: October 20, 1994 Introduction Council is requested to adopt Resolution Number 4109. Background The U.S. Treasury has passed final rules covering reimbursement bonds. We have been operating under temporary or non-final rules for several years. Bond counsel has prepared Resolution Number 4109 for the city to be in compliance when issuing reimbursement bonds. Action Requested Offer Resolution Number 4109, A Resolution Establishing Procedures Relating To Compliance With Reimbursement Bond Regulations Under The Internal Revenue Code, and move its adoption. RESOLUTION NO. 4109 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES RELATING TO COMPLIANCE WITH REIMBURSEMENT BOND REGULATIONS UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the "City") , as follows: 1. Recitals, (a) The United States Department of Treasury has promulgated final regulations governing the use of proceeds of tax-exempt bonds, all or a portion of which are to be used to reimburse the City for project expenditures paid by the City prior to the date of issuance of such bonds. Those regulations (Treasury Regulations, Section 1.150-2) (the "Regulations") require that the City adopt a statement of official intent to reimburse an original expenditure not later than 60 days after payment of the original expenditure. The Regulations also generally require that the bonds be issued and the reimbursement allocation made from the proceeds of the bonds within 18 months (or three years, if the reimbursement bond issue qualifies for the "small issuer" exception from the arbitrage rebate requirement) after the later of (i) the date the expenditure is paid or (ii) the date the project is placed in service or abandoned, but (unless the issue qualifies for the "small issuer" exception from the arbitrage rebate requirement) in no event more than three years after the date the expenditure is paid. The Regulations generally permit reimbursement of capital expenditures and costs of issuance of the bonds. (b) The City desire to comply with the requirements of the Regulations and to establish certain procedures relating thereto. 2. Official Intent Declaration: Delegation: Procedures. (a) The Regulations, in the situations in which they apply, require the City to have declared its official intent (the "Official Intent Declaration" or the "Declaration") to reimburse itself for previously paid project expenditures out of the proceeds of subsequently issued debt. This Council hereby authorizes the City Finance Director, or in the event of his or his absence or disability, the City Administrator ("the officer") , to make the City's Official Intent Declarations. (b) The following procedures shall be observed by the Officer in making Official Intent Declarations: (a) Each Declaration shall be made by the Officer substantially in the form of Exhibit A attached hereto, which is hereby incorporated herein and made a part of this Resolution. (b) The City Clerk shall maintain a file in his or her office in which all Declarations shall be kept. Promptly after making a Declaration, the Officer shall deliver the Declaration to the City Clerk for filing. (c) The Officer shall endeavor not to make Declarations in cases • where the City will not ultimately be issuing reimbursement bonds to provide long-term financing for project costs, and the Officer is hereby authorized and directed to 'consult with the City's financial advisor and bond counsel concerning thefrequirements of the Regulations in general and their application in particular circumstances. (d) The Council shall be advised from time to time as to the Declarations made and on the desirability and timing of the issuance of reimbursement bonds relating to project expenditures for which Declarations have been filed, including recommendations on the timing of the issuance of such bonds so that the "reimbursement period" requirement described in the Regulations can be met. 3. Reimbursement Allocations. The Officer shall also be responsible for making the "reimbursement allocations" described in the Regulations, being generally the transfer of the appropriate amount of proceeds of the reimbursement bonds to reimburse the source of temporary financing used by the City to make prior payment of the costs of the projects. Each allocation shall be evidenced by an entry on the official books and records of the City maintained with respect to the bonds or the projects and shall specifically identify the actual prior expenditure being reimbursed. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form City Attorney CONSENT is 6, MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer SUBJECT: Street Light at Valley Park Drive and Valley Industrial Blvd. South DATE: November 1, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 4112, a resolution calling a hearing for installing a street light at the intersection of Valley Park Drive and Valley Industrial Boulevard South. BACKGROUND: The request for a street light at this intersection was originally made by Council Member Dirks last June. Pursuant to Council direction, staff has obtained a cost estimate from Shakopee Public Utilities for installing the light. The estimated cost for the light is $897.00 (see attached estimate). The Special Assessment Policy allows for assessing new street light installations 100% to the benefitting property owners. In the past, the costs of assessing these type of projects have very nearly outweighed the income generated by the assessment. This happens mostly in residential areas where numerous property owners benefit. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 4112 which sets the public hearing for December 6, 1994. 2. Direct staff to have the street light constructed and fund the expense from the General Fund Contingency (no assessments). 3. Deny Resolution No. 4112 and do not install the street light. 4. Table the decision to obtain more information from staff. RECOMMENDATION: Being that this light will be installed in an industrial area, with relatively few benefitting property owners, staff feels that costs to assess the project are not likely to outweigh the income. Therefore, staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4112, A Resolution Calling a Hearing on the Installation of a Street Light at the Intersection of Valley Park Drive and Valley Industrial Boulevard South, Project No. 1995-4 and move its adoption. DMN/pmp MEM4112 ST. LIGHT CO. RD. 83 & VALLEY IND. BLVD. SO. COST ESTIMATE 1 10 ' ST. LIGHT ARM @ $106 . 00 106 . 00 1 250 WATT HPS LUMANAIRE @ $109 . 00 109 . 00 1 250 HPS LAMP @ $ 12 . 00 12 .00 1 PHOTO EYE @ $6 . 00 6 . 00 1 1 KVA 7200 VOLT TRANS. @ $277 . 00 277 . 00 1 CUT OUT 15KV 100 AMP @ $44. 00 44 . 00 1 LIGHTNING ARRESTER 10 KV POLE MOUNT @ $28. 00 28. 00 6 MAN HOURS @ $35 . 00 210 . 00 3 TRUCK HOURS #614 @ $35 .00 105 . 00 TOTAL $897 .00 /o 79Y -n1 • RESOLUTION NO. 4112 A Resolution Calling A Hearing On The Installation Of A Street Light At The Intersection Of Valley Park Drive And Valley Industrial Boulevard South Project No. 1995-4 WHEREAS, a cost estimate has been prepared by the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission outlining the City's cost for installing the street light; and WHEREAS,the City Council of Shakopee desires to assess this project. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the installation of a street light at the intersection of Valley Park Drive and Valley Industrial Boulevard South and assess the abutting and benefitted property for all of the cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of$897.00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 6th day of December, 1994, at 7:30 P.M. or thereafter, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, at 129 S. Holmes Street, Shakopee, Minnesota, and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. 3. The work of this project is hereby designated as part of the 1995-4 Public Improvement Program. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney CONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer AYIN SUBJECT: County Road 16 Improvements DATE: October 25, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 4113, a resolution calling a public hearing for the improvement to County State Aid Highway 16, from County Road 17 to approximately 1,000 feet east of County Road 83. BACKGROUND: The County is proposing to reconstruct the above mentioned roadway in 1995 to a four lane urban section. The cost sharing policy with Scott County calls for the City to pay for 50% of the curb and gutter costs. The City's Special Assessment Policy allows for assessing the City cost for the curb and gutter 100% to the abutting property owners. A public hearing is required prior to the County awarding the construction contract in order to assess this project. Earlier this summer, a public hearing was held for utility improvements in the County Road 16 corridor. The curb and gutter was not addressed at that hearing and likewise, the utility improvements will not be addressed at the hearing on December 6, 1994. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 4113. 2. Deny Resolution No. 4113. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4113, A Resolution Calling a Hearing on an Improvement to County State Aid Highway 16, from County Road 17 to Approximately 1,000 Feet East of County Road 83, Project No. 1995-3 and move its adoption. DMN/pmp MEM4113 • RESOLUTION NO. 4113 A Resolution Calling A Hearing On An Improvement To County State Aid Highway 16, From County Road 17 To Approximately 1,000 Feet East Of County Road 83 Project No. 1995-3 WHEREAS, a cost participation agreement has been prepared by the Scott County Engineer outlining the City's cost participation on the County State Aid Highway's Project in accordance with the Scott County Cost Participation Agreement; and WHEREAS,the City Council of Shakopee desires to assess part of the City's cost for this project. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of County State Aid Highway 16,from County Road 17 to approximately 1,000 feet east of County Road 83 by addition of curb &gutter and assess the abutting and benefitted property for all of the cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of$65,800.00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 6th day of December, 1994, at 7:30 P.M. or thereafter, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, at 129 S. Holmes Street, Shakopee, Minnesota, and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. 3. The work of this project is hereby designated as part of the 1995-3 Public Improvement Program. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney /5- MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer DA NI SUBJECT: St. Francis Trunk Watermain DATE: November 1, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 4117, a resolution receiving a report and calling a hearing on an improvement for watermain to serve the proposed St. Francis Regional Medical Center area. BACKGROUND: On July 6, 1993 the City Council ordered the preparation of a feasibility report for extending sanitary sewer and water services to the proposed St. Francis Regional Medical Center site. Due to the timing of the sewer and water portions of the report, the report was split into two separate reports, one for each utility. The watermain report was prepared by Shakopee Public Utilities consultant, Schoell and Madson, and is attached for Council review. The assessment roll is still being prepared, and will be available for the December 6th public hearing. The report recommends installing watermain from Vierling Drive east of Marschall Road south to the proposed regional medical center site. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 4117. 2. Deny Resolution No. 4117. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4117, A Resolution Receiving a Report and Calling a Hearing on the St. Francis Regional Medical Center Watermain Improvements, Project No. 1995-2 and move its adoption. DMN/pmp MEM4117 • • RESOLUTION NO. 4117 A Resolution Receiving A Report And Calling A Hearing On The St. Francis Regional Medical Center Watermain Improvements Project No. 1995-2 WHEREAS,pursuant to Resolution No. 3828 of the City Council adopted July 6, 1993, a report has been prepared by the City Engineer, with reference to the improvement by installation of watermain to serve the St. Francis Regional Medical Center and this report was received by the Council on November 1, 1994. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of installation of watermain to serve the proposed St. Francis Regional Medical Center in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting and benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of$269,000.00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 6th day of December, 1994, at 7:30 P.M. or thereafter, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, at 129 South Holmes Street, Shakopee, Minnesota, and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. 3. The work of this project is hereby designated as part of the 1995-2 Public Improvement Program. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney - SCHOEL . Ss,MADSON, INC. - EttNGIF\fEER S•Sa-LIRVEY€lRS'PLANNERS SOIL EST1NG.EIVVIR©NMENTAL-SERVICES 105E0 WAYZATA ]ULEVARE. •M{N,ETET©NKA.MN 55343-5482 I 1 FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR CSAH 17 / ST FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER TRUNK WATERMAIN 1 1 1 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my ' direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. X444a doastej Date /0- /4 941 Registration No. 12048 1 OCTOBER, 1994 1 I 4111111 ' — — SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. ENGINEERS •SURVEYORS• PLANNERS SOIL TESTING •ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ' I 10580 WAYZATA BOULEVARD • SUITE 1 • MINNETONKA, MN 55305-1525 0692) 546-7601 • FAX C6123 546-9000 October 13, 1994 1 The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 ' Subject: CSAH 17 - St. Francis Medical Center Trunk Watermain Ladies and Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is the Feasibility Report for extension of trunk watermain from Vierling Drive to the St. Francis Medical Center site. As engineers for the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission, we were authorized to prepare this report. The report was reviewed and approved by Shakopee Public Utilities Commission at their October 3, 1994 Commission ' meeting. We will be available to present this report to the City Council and at the public hearing. Very truly yours, SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. Kenneth Adolf ' KEA/cj cc: Lou Van Hout, SPUC AFFIRMATIVE ACTION • EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER I I TABLE OF CONTENTS I 1 DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. I IIntroduction 1 Scope 1 I Background g 1 IProposed Water Improvements 1 Cost Estimate 4 I Special Assessments 4 ISummary and Conclusions 6 I I I I I 1 I I I I I INTRODUCTION I IBy Resolution No. 3828, the City Council of Shakopee ordered the preparation of a feasibility report for the extension of sanitary sewer and watermain to the St. Francis Regional Medical ICenter. The sanitary sewer improvements were included in a separate report. I I I I I SCOPE This report evaluates the feasibility of extending trunk watermain from Vierling Drive to the proposed St. Francis Regional Medical Center. See Figure 1. This report provides recommended improvements, cost estimates, possible funding sources and an estimated assessment rate. BACKGROUND In June of 1993, representatives of the St. Francis Regional Medical Center r petitioned for sewer and water services for the proposed Medical Campus adjacent to County State Aid Highway 17 I 111I I I l and south of the Trunk Highway (T.H.) 101 Bypass. The campus would be built in several phases with the first phase to be completed by fall 1995. The water service will be needed for the first phase of the construction. Initial discussions with representatives of the Medical Center regarding siting of a water booster station on this site started in December 1993. The initial draft of this report was completed in April 1994. The site plan for the Medical Center was revised several times. The trunk watermain alignment was dependent on the booster station location and completion of the report was delayed until the site plan was finalized. PROPOSED WATER IMPROVEMENTS The St. Francis Regional Medical Center site is located south of the boundary for the municipal water system's normal elevation service (NES) district. This means that the ground elevations of the site are too high to receive water service at acceptable pressure from the existing water system. The district boundary is at elevation 825 and the site elevation ranges from 836 to 849. This would be the first development outside of the normal elevation service district. 1 1 1 ' The Comprehensive Water Plan dated April 1993 presented preliminary concepts for the extension of municipal water into the first high elevation service (1-HES) district with specific ' discussion on the proposed Medical Center site. The components of the system to supply water to the 1-HES district consist of a 16-inch watermain along CSAH 17 and a booster station with a temporary hydropneumatic(pressure)tank. The booster pumps and hydropneumatic tank would 1 increase the water pressure from the NES district to service the 1-HES district. Ultimately, the first high elevation service district would require its own storage tank. However, as water service is initially extended into the district, it may not be feasible both from an operational or economic perspective to construct the storage tank. As a temporary system, water pressure to the first high elevation district would be provided by the hydropneumatic tank. This ' method was utilized at pumphouse No. 4 prior to the Valley Industrial Park water system connection to the Shakopee system. The Medical Center site and other lower elevation areas in the 1-HES district can obtain fire flow at sufficient pressure from the existing or normal elevation service district storage tanks. In order to convey the water from the present system south to the first high elevation service district at minimal pressure loss, we recommend installation of a 16-inch diameter watermain on Marshal Road. Under normal demand conditions, the booster pump would pump from the 16-inch watermain and provide the increased pressure required for higher elevation. However, in the event of a high fire flow demand which exceeds the capacity of the booster pump, a bypass valve could be opened to provide additional flow. This works because fire flow demand can be provided at a minimum of 20 psi, while consumer demand requires a minimum of 35 psi. The Comprehensive Water Plan proposed that the booster station site be located on the Medical ' Center campus. The Medical Center has agreed to provide a site located in the northeast corner of the development, however the conditions for this acquisition have not yet been negotiated. The intent is that the site would also be used for a future well for the 1-HES district. The site would need to be a minimum size of 100 feet by 100 feet. This feasibility report includes only the 16-inch trunk watermain which will involve assessment of lateral watermain benefit to adjacent properties. The booster station and future well would be funded by Shakopee Public Utility Commission's Water Connection Charge with no costs to be assessed. ' Thero osed trunk watermain consists of a 16-inch diameter watermain from the existing16-inch P P ' watermain on Vierling Drive south to the booster station site in the northeast corner of the Medical Center campus as shown on Figure 1. The route crosses the 101 Bypass. This trunk watermain can provide water service to the area within the NES district. The watermain within ' the 1-HES district is a transmission main with no lateral benefit. The intent of this alignment is to cross the Bypass east of the interchange ramps to reduce the length of the Bypass crossing and to maximize the lateral benefit provided by the main. 2 I IThe initial draft of this report included an alternative alignment adjacent to CSAH 17. The proposed booster station site location makes the easterly alignment the most feasible and the Iwesterly alignment by CSAH 17 has been deleted from the report. Easements will be required for the entire watermain route except for the Bypass crossing. 1 Concept planning for the property between Vierling Drive and the Bypass and the property between the Bypass and the Medical Center site is in process. The intent would be to obtain the easements by dedication as part of the development review and approval process, if possible. I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 3 I I COST ESTIMATES I The estimated project cost is summarized below. A detailed cost estimate can be found in the IAppendix. IEstimated Water Construction Cost $196,000 Plus 10% Contingencies 19,600 ISubtotal 215,600 IPlus 25% Engineering & Administrative Cost 53,400 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $269,000 IThe above estimates do not include any easement acquisition costs or fiscal fees and interest. I SPECIAL ASSESSMENT/FUNDING The areas receiving lateral watermain benefit from the proposed watermain are shown on Figure I1. The properties receiving benefit are zoned commercial or multi-family residential. Shakopee Public Utility Commission's policy requires these zoning districts to install an 8" watermain in I a grid type layout north-south through the proposed development. In this case, the properties on both sides of the watermain route are wide enough in the east-west direction that each individual property would be required to provide an 8-inch diameter watermain. The two 8-inch mains are I combined to one equivalent 10-inch diameter watermain. The cost for a 10-inch watermain would be assessed to the properties adjacent to the trunk watermain within the NES district. The assessment area includes the developed Dalles Townhome Addition. This property is responsible I for providing a watermain in the north-south and is therefore included in the assessment area. The frontage within the power line easement on the south side of the Bypass was excluded. The costs for oversizing the watermain from 10-inch to 16-inch diameter would be paid by SPUC and ' funded by the trunk water charge. SPUC has agreed to fund 100 percent of the Bypass crossing cost. The trunk watermain within the 1-HES district provides no lateral benefit and all related costs would, therefore, be funded by SPUC or could be assessed to the Medical Center site. 1 I4 1 1 1 Following is a tabulation of the various cost components: ' Estimated Cost Bypass Crossing cost $94,200 1 Oversizing Cost in NES district 49,000 Watermain Cost in 1-HES district 31,000 Subtotal - SPUC Costs 174,200 1 Lateral Watermain Costs 94,800 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $269,000 The proposed alignment has 3,100 feet of trunk watermain frontage which provides lateral water benefit. 1 Based on the lateral watermain benefit frontage and the lateral watermain cost, the estimated lateral watermain assessment is: 1 Alternate No. 1 - $94,800 = $30.58 per foot 3100 ft. 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 i5 1 I RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS I Municipal water service to the St. Francis Medical Center site can be feasibly provided by I proposed alignment shown on Figure 1. A booster station will be required to provide adequate pressure to the Medical Center site. The booster station will be funded from SPUC trunk water fund and is not included in this report The total probable project cost is $269,000 of which I $94,800 is lateral watermain cost which is assessed and the remaining $174,200 is SPUC cost for the Bypass crossing, oversizing and watermain in the HES district. The entire watermain route except the Bypass crossing is on easements. The intent would be to obtain the easements by Idedication as part of the development review and approval process, if possible. Costs for easement acquisition or fiscal fees and interest are not included in the cost estimate. IThe St. Francis Medical Center proposes completion of the first phase by fall 1995. Water supply to the site is required during construction for fire protection. The project should be Ischeduled to start construction in early spring. I 1 1 1 1 III 1 1 6 1 I i FIGURE 1 I ASSESSr/ ENT• I • '--"-;-1--- iratitA 142• V , V I IJ 0�qe�: as i�� t 0 1iI giv a % - mo` -„,+'1 - ,'gm.. iesrrt• �� gr. F�•- - i gin .r►. a. .ct�t*C - irg iritic..., . M� I nj ” �►iA o•�w ., • //tau/IvuOU ia•r •ltd*•tl ez �: vI �► :c�''7 c `, �_ 1 er.i�.11taIV,. sIf s, /L1D Fe r ��+ 1Ik1v, q } +j-e wl c Gsr wh a Lila ' t- +''v 'lir `l.' " ijam .1 �-- la �_ "42-i h?�r�r3 6`� 1 '! ■:I[:.i�ys`��, ,,_<A;r —� r.1C••-s ! =WM= ii�1j l — NC, DRI`/ 6- ► �t�1�;`��jt; VIES I o a ie..#i�416 ���h,� 91111`1111171 r�R ea!18111;111P��llti� r ss►moi tg ---- --1 'VICE DIST Its .ci INDI•• • JO ilii .1 I `�' ; ll1l PROPOSED ALIG MENT 825 Eii 16" WATERMAIN U I, I x , --�-- ._ 825 �� 1ST HIGH EI1.EV. / . -..,,. SERVICE DISTRICT •• T. I ___,E E R ~ r' 1 IT ! . I i LEGEND L_____. LATERAL BENEFIT 1 ASSESSMENT AREA I • PROPOSED WATERMAIN I I ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER WATER UTILITY IMPROVEMENT I PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST I 16-INCH DIAMETER TRUNK WATERMAIN VIERLING DRIVE TO BOOSTER STATION SITE I1. Mobilization Lump Sum $9,190 2. 16" DIP 2,660 LF @ $36.00/LF 95,760 3. 16" GV w/MH 4 EA @ $3,100.00/EA 12,400 4. 8" DIP Service Pipe 120 LF @ $20.00/LF 2,400 5. 8" GV 6 EA @ $450.00/EA 2,700 6. Hydrants 7 EA @ $1,700.00/EA 11,900 1 I 7. Fittings 5,500 LB @ $1.50/LB 8,250 8. 30" Steel Casing 300 LF @ $140.00/LF 42,000 with 16" DIP I 9. Connect to Ex. WM 1 EA @ $1,000.00 1,000 10. Erosion Control Lump Sum 2,500 11. Traffic Control Lump Sum 1,000 I12. Bituminous Restoration Lump Sum 3,500 13. Seed and Mulch Lump Sum 3,400 ITOTAL PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST $196,000 I I I I I I I 1 7 I