Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/9/1994 TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ.REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 9, 1994 LOCATION: City Hall, 129 Holmes Street South Mayor Gary Laurent presiding 1] Roll Call at 6: 00 p.m. 2] Other Business 3 ] Adjourn to Tuesday, November 15, 1994 at 7: 00 p.m. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 9, 1994 1] Roll Call at 6: 00 p.m. 2 ] Other Business 3 ] ` Adjourn to Tuesday, November 15, 1994 at 7 : 00 p.m. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE NOVEMBER 9, 1994 1) Roll Call at 6: 00 p.m. 2 ) Approve Minutes of October 12th and 25th, 1994 3 ] Brief Housing Presentation - verbal 4] Comprehensive Plan Review: Goals, Objectives, and Policies - bring memo from October 25th meeting 5] Discuss Sewer, Transportation and Stormwater Plans - verbal 6) Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge Policy - bring memo from October 25th meeting, additional information will be on the table 7 ] Zoning Map Review 8] Other business 9] Adjourn Dennis R. Kraft City Administrator OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE OCTOBER 12 , 1994 Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 5: 08 p.m. with Councilmembers Lynch, Beard, and Sweeney present. Present from Shakopee Public Utilities: Jim Cook, President; Gloria Vierling, Commissioner; Terry O'Toole, Commissioner (arrived at 5: 25 p.m. ) ; Lou Van Hout, Manager; and Joe Adams. Also present: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator; Mark Erickson, Assistant City Attorney; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer; Lindberg Ekola; Planning Director; Paul Bilotta, Senior Planner; Gregg Voxland, Finance Director; and Frank Ries, Fire Chief. Beard/Lynch moved to approve the agenda as printed. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Beard moved to approve the minutes of August 30th and September 28th, 1994 . Motion carried unanimously. President Cook called the Shakopee Public Utility Commission (SPUC) meeting to order. President Cook gave a presentation on a number of issues relating to the Commission. President Cook updated the City Council on the SPUC acquisition of properties for the new substation and two wells. President Cook acknowledged the additional cost for the downtown electric undergrounding over that budgeted by SPUC. He thanked the City Council for their willingness to share 50/50 in the amount over the estimated cost. President Cook reviewed SPUC's acquisition of additional service area in 1991. He acknowledged the agreement that the City would forgo their share of profits for four years to help finance the acquisition. He stated that in 1995 the City would begin receiving revenue from this area and the residents in this area will realize a reduction in their rates. President Cook stated that Shakopee Public Utilities sold bonds in 1993 for capital improvements (60% electric, 40% water) and that they will have to sell bonds again in 1996 for water projects. President Cook explained the financial strain on SPUC because of the watermain replacement activity which has taken place in conjunction with the street reconstruction projects the City has undertaken over the past couple of years. He said that SPUC had decided to install new watermains when the City does a street reconstruction. As a result of their being so many street reconstruction projects, SPUC will need to sell bonds in 1996. He Official Proceedings of the October 12, 1994 Shakopee City Council (COW) Page -2- said that SPDC needs input into proposed street reconstruction projects before the City orders a project. President Cook reviewed the manner and formula for SPUC's contribution to the City's General Fund. He stated that SPUC contributed $435, 000 in 1992 for electricity, water and free electric service, and $548, 000 in 1993 . Commissioner O'Toole arrived and took his seat. Cncl.Beard asked the status of the street light at CR-83 and Valley Industrial Boulevard So. Mr. Adams stated that they are preparing an estimate. Discussion ensued on the future use of the old park and recreation building North of Hwy 101. Mr. Kraft stated that the building is isolated from view and is experiencing vandalism and deterioration. Mr. Van Hout stated that SPUC needs to retain about one-third of the building for their switching gear. Cncl.Sweeney suggested separating the switching gear from the rest of the area and giving it to the DNR because of its proximity to the trail. Discussion ensued on the reconstruction of CR-15 and the need to relocate the electric poles. Mr. Van Hout explained that there is a cross-walk signal located here and it is not clear who is responsible for fixing it. He said that it is being addressed. He explained that the redesign of this intersection is probably dependent upon what happens to the pedestrian crossing because the signal hangs on the wires that hold up the poles. Cncl.Sweeney stated that we can't afford not to have a crossing signal there; CR-15 is going to be a four lane county road. Consensus not to hang the crossing signal on a wire and that Mr. Nummer talk to the County about doing a warrant study to determine need for the signal. Considerable discussion ensued regarding the City of Savage's need for additional sources of water and the pumping of water at the Shiely Quarry. Cncl.Sweeney explained what transpired at a recent meeting where a lengthy report was presented regarding the options open to the City of Savage. There may be a need for a study and Shakopee may be asked to participate in the cost because of the impact on the City of Shakopee. There was a consensus that representatives from both SPUC and the City need to continue to attend meetings regarding this matter. Staff was directed to contact the Department of Natural Resources regarding their input into the matter. Mayor Laurent thanked the Shakopee Public Utility Commission members and staff for attending the joint meeting. O'Toole/Vierling moved to adjourn the SPUC meeting. Motion carried. . Official Proceedings of the October 12, 1994 Shakopee City Council (COW) Page -3- The City Council took a fifteen minute break at 7 : 00 p.m. and the SPUC members and their staff left the meeting. Mr. Bilotta explained that staff has outlined in the memo all of the major issues that it could identify regarding the preparation of the 1994 Comprehensive Plan Update. He stated that there is an aggressive schedule on the back of the status report and that staff is hoping to get things done by the end of the year. He said that the zoning map approval process will be starting in November. Discussion ensued on having a pro-active policy on affordable housing. Consensus to have a meeting to discuss a Council policy on affordable housing. Mayor Laurent asked if there were any other controversial areas that needed to be discussed. Cncl.Sweeney stated that if the City Council approves Comprehensive Plan Land Use policy 2.2.d, property outside of the MUSA line will not be rezoned for commercial, industrial, or urban residential uses, there will be sufficient policy direction to re-map the City. Discussion followed. Mr. Kraft stated that staff is looking for some direction so that they can put the zoning maps together for discussion. Staff was directed to advise Council of any problems that may exist at the October 25th meeting, if this policy is adopted. Mayor Laurent asked how people will be notified of the November 3rd public hearing on the rezonings. Mr. Ekola responded. Mr. Steve Soltau, Shakopee Crossings, expressed concern about down zoning of property in his area where they have industrial zoning located outside the MUSA. He stated that if the property in his area were rezoned to AG in the re-mapping process, they have concerns because they have to consider industrial as a possible use for the property. If industrial is not a fall back option for them, they would have to take a very serious look at the re- mapping. He would like to see this addressed by City Council. Mr. Jon Albinson, Valley Green Business Park, reminded Council that they negotiated an indemnification clause into the agreement with Met Council and Metropolitan Waste Control Commission because of the possible presumption of taking as a result of allowing only 4 lots per 40 acres in the R-1 zone. He asked City Council to give serious consideration to not adopting this particular type policy. He said there are issues, like Steve addressed, where rezonings could be construed as takings. Rezoning I-1 zoned property to AG removes any development potential for them. This action would also affect the property he represents. Mr. Kraft stated that staff would like to prepare a draft zoning map for discussion so that Council would have something specific to • react to. . Official Proceedings of the October 12, 1994 Shakopee City Council (COW) Page -4- Discussion ensued on future Committee of the Whole meeting dates. Council agreed to the Committee of the Whole meeting dates as printed on the calendar provided: October 25th at 5: 30 p.m. ; November 9th, November 22nd, November 29th at 5: 30 p.m. ; and December 7th and December 14th at 7: 00 p.m. Mayor Laurent adjourned the meeting to Tuesday, October 25th, 1994 at 5:30 p.m. Meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m. biJA Judith S. Cox ,City Clerk Recording Secretary OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE OCTOBER 25, 1994 Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 5: 33 P.M. with Councilmembers Lynch, Beard, and Sweeney. Also present: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator; Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator; Mark Erickson, Assistant City Attorney; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; Lindberg Ekola, Planning Director; Dave Nummer; Staff Engineer; and Paul Bilotta, Senior Planner. Mayor recessed the meeting for a meeting of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Mayor Laurent re-convened the meeting at 5:41 P.M. Mr. Bilotta explained the activities that have been undertaken leading up to the preparation of the draft Goals, Objectives and Policies for the Shakopee Comprehensive Plan. He suggested that the Council only discuss those areas where they do not concur with the recommendations of the Planning Commission or have raised concerns in their individual reviews. Economic Development Goal No. 4 . Maintain downtown Shakopee's p p function as the social and psychological center of the City. Discussion ensued on whether or not the downtown area should be treated differently than other parts of town. There was also discussion on 4 .2 .c. relating to encouraging higher density housing in the downtown through the use of financial incentives. Consensus to retain Goal No. 4 and to re-write 4 .2 .c. encouraging higher density housing in the downtown but de-emphasizing its significance for economic development. Land Use Goal No. 1. Identify and preserve the area's natural resources. Discussion ensued on Alternative 2 of 1. 1 Development shall be allowed in a pattern which minimizes disruption of prime agricultural soils, wetlands, forests, groundwater, viewlines and other natural resources. Consensus to retain Alternative 2 of 1. 1 deleting "viewlines" . Land Use Goal No. 2 . Discussion ensued on Alternative 2 of 2.2.a. recommended by the Planning Commission: "Future unsewered residential subdivisions shall be required to plan for resubdivision of land when sewer service becomes available. Clustering of houses on urban sized lots and transfer of density will be encouraged as long as the overall density of one house per 10 acres is maintained and safe septic tank operation is ensured. Official Proceedings of the October 25, 1994 Shakopee City Council (COW) Page -2- If the subdivider chooses not to cluster the development on urban sized lots, an overall density of one house per 40 acres shall be maintained. " Consensus to retain Alternative 1 of 2 .2.a. (which does not include the last sentence of Alternative 2 of 2 . 2 .a) . Land Use Goal No. 2 . Discussion ensued on Alternative 1 of 2 . 2 .d. "Undeveloped areas outside of the MUSA line will not be zoned for commercial, industrial, or urban residential uses. An exception to this policy would be if the site were to be used exclusively for mining purposes. " Consensus to retain Alternative 2 of 2 . 2 .d. (which does not include the last sentence of Alternative 1 of 2 .2 .d. ) and that staff alter the text so as to clarify that existing zoned property should not be downzoned. Sweeney/Lynch moved to approve Alternative 2, Land Use Goal No. 2 . 2.d: Undeveloped areas outside of the MUSA line will not be zoned for commercial, industrial, or urban residential uses. Motion carried unanimously. Land Use Goal No. 2 . Discussion ensued on 2 .2 .e. : In order to promote public safety and minimize loss of life, the Official Zoning Map shall be amended to prevent new urban-density residential developments outside of the Fire Department's 1.5 mile station service radius. Consensus to down grade the language by identifying it as an urban service. Land Use Goal No. 2 . Discussion ensued on the three alternatives for 2 . 3 .a. relating to where retail development will occur first: at the intersection of Marschall Road and the 101 Bypass or at the intersection of CR-18 and the 101 Bypass. Consensus to retain Alternative 3 of 2. 3 .a. and to delete the last sentence so that it will read: Large tracts of land will be identified for City-wide or region-wide retail development at the intersections of Marschall Road/101 Bypass and CR 18/101 Bypass. The meeting was recessed at 6:51 P.M. and re-convened at 7: 04 P.M. Mayor Laurent explained the process that has been followed by the Council in order to select a candidate to fill the vacancy on the City Council created by the resignation of Kris Dirks. He thanked everyone who had applied for the vacancy and stated that he felt that any one of the three finalists could work well with the Council. Official Proceedings of the October 25, 1994 Shakopee City Council (COW) Page -3- The three final candidates were present and drew numbers indicating the order in which they would make a three to five minute presentation to City Council. The candidates drawing numbers 2 and 3 were asked to leave the Council Chambers while the other presentation(s) were made. The three final candidates gave a five minute presentation to City Council in the following order: Jon Brekke, Terry Joos, and George Muenchow. Councilmembers asked questions following each presentation. Following the presentations by the three final candidates, Councilmembers voted by secret ballot for a candidate to fill the vacancy. The City Clerk announced the results. First Ballot: Mr. Brekke: Cncl.Sweeney and Cncl.Beard Mr. Joos: Cncl.Lynch Mr. Muenchow: Mayor Laurent Second Ballot: Mr. Brekke: Cncl.Sweeney, Cncl.Lynch, Mayor Laurent Mr. Joos: None Mr. Muenchow: Cncl.Beard Sweeney/Beard moved to recommend to the City Council the appointment of Mr. Brekke to fill the vacancy on the City Council. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent adjourned the meeting at 8:00 P.M. I ek ti4g)ail..). (0)() ' ith S. Cox 4 y Clerk i; 'ecording Secretary W-3 City of Shakopee Housing Data Source for all data(U.S. Census) Table 1: Housing Units by Type (1990) Units Percent SF Detached 2,777 64.0% Alt. Housing Types 1,563 36.0% TOTAL 4,340 100.0% Table 2: Home Ownership 1980 1990 Shakopee 68.52% 67.8% Metro 63.97% 64.4% Table 3: Value of Owner Occupied Units (1990) Shakopee Metro Less than $50,000 2.1% 3.9% $50,000-$99,999 75.7% 60.9% $100,000-$149,999 18.7% 23.1% $150,000-$199,999 2.8% 6.6% $200,000+ 0.7% 5.6% Table 4: Median Value of Owner-Occupied Housing (1990 Dollars) 1980 1990 Change Shakopee $99,852 $86,200 -13.7% Metro $102,542 $89,211 -13.0% Table 5: Median Monthly Rent Contract (1990 Dollars) 1980 1990 Change Shakopee $390 $445 14.1% Metro $377 $447 18.6% Table 6: Median Household Income (1989 Dollars) 1979 1989 Change Shakopee $39,925 $42,062 5.4% Metro $34,610 $36,678 6.0% Table 7: Household Income Breakdown(1989) Shakopee Metro Less than $17,500 18.8% 20.1% $17,500-$29,999 18.8% 19.1% $30,000-$42,499 21.8% 19.6% $42,500-$59,999 22.1% 20.1% $60,000 or higher 18.5% 21.1% Table 8: Poverty Rates (1989) Shakopee Metro Total Persons 5.1% 8.1% Under 18 Years Old 1.5% 3.0% Over 65 Years Old 0.9% 0.7% Below 200% of Poverty 15.1% 19.3% 2 Table 9: Percent of Households in Unaffordable Housing 1979 1989 Change Shakopee Owner HH's 19.0% 14.3% -4.7% Metro Owner HH's 19.3% 14.9% -4.4% Shakopee Renter HH's 48.2% 29.4% -18.8% Metro Renter HH's 46.3% 40.1% -6.2% (Unaffordable defined as households paying over 25% of income in 1979 or 30% of income in 1989 for housing cost--Federal Housing affordability standard) 3 MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Paul Bilotta, Senior Planner DATE: November 9, 1994 RE: Comprehensive Plan Review: Goals, Objectives and Policies The discussion that began at the October 25, 1994 C.O.W. meeting will be continued at the November 9, 1994 C.O.W. meeting. Please bring the memo and exhibits from the earlier meeting. Staff will also provide a brief summary of the statistics for the Comprehensive Plan section on Housing. This item was originally scheduled for November 22, however, Staff has moved it up in the schedule so that this background information will be available to the City Council as it reviews the Housing Goals, Objectives and Policies. MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer p/lIJ SUBJECT: Trunk Sewer Policy DATE: November 8, 1994 INTRODUCTION: In reviewing the comments on the Draft Trunk Sewer Charge Policy, a question of equity was raised regarding the inclusion of the Chaska Interceptor into the Trunk Sewer Policy. Staff is seeking direction on this equity issue. BACKGROUND: One of the comments received on the Draft Trunk Sewer Policy was that the entire 2040 MUSA area (the area proposed for trunk fees) was helping to fund the Chaska Interceptor, while only about half of that same area actually has access to the interceptor. This leads to a situation where half of the trunk sewer fee area is paying for a facility which they cannot use and do not benefit from. This portion of the Draft Trunk Sewer Policy would be in conflict with the current Special Assessment Policy, which only provides for assessing properties which benefit from an improvement. No assessment (or trunk fee) can be levied against properties which do not show increased market value (benefit). The City Attorney has also commented that this policy has questionable legal foundations, and would probably not be defendable in a court of law. A second problem with the draft policy has also been identified. By including the Chaska Interceptor in the Trunk Sewer Charge Policy the costs are spread out to all properties within the trunk sewer fee area(2040 MUSA area). This means that all the funds for the Chaska Interceptor will not be collected until all of the properties within the 2040 MUSA area develop, which is 50 years. The payment schedule for the Chaska Interceptor requires the City to pay off the debt in a 20 year time frame, with lump sum payments of 25% of the principal (± $1,000,000.00) due every five years. According to the Draft Trunk Sewer Policy, at the end of 20 years, the City would have collected 20\50 = 40% of the funds to pay for the Chaska interceptor, but would be required to have all of the debt repayed. The City would have to fund the remaining 60%, and recover that subsidy through trunk sewer charges from development until the year 2040. • 1 Another factor which further complicates the problem is that while staff believes development interest will be present in Shakopee to fill out the 2040 MUSA area, and generate the trunk fees from that area, there is no guarantee that this development will occur. This leaves the City in the position of relying on development occurring to fund the Chaska Interceptor, and recover the City's subsidy of that facility. Staff has formulated several alternatives to address this situation. ALTERNATIVE NO. 1 Alternative No. 1 is to include the costs associated with the Chaska Interceptor in the Trunk Sewer Fee Policy and apply this policy to the proposed 2040 MUSA area(equivalent to the draft policy). Discussion -Alternative No. 1 The drawbacks to this alternative are the same as those already identified for the existing policy, the possible "inequity" of the entire 2040 MUSA area contributing to the Chaska Interceptor costs, and the difference in the payment schedule (20 years) and the income schedule (50 years). The cost analysis for Alternative No. 1 is included on Page 1 of the attachments. This analysis shows that the City will have to subsidize$4,904,080.00 above and beyond the revenue generated by the trunk charges, to meet the payment schedule as shown in the agreement with the Metropolitan Council. The City's subsidy would then be recovered, from trunk charges in years 20 - 50 (the buildout of the 2040 MUSA area). The table on Page 1 also shows the estimated sewer flow rate increase that would be necessary for each five year period prior to lump sum principal payments. The advantages to Alternative No. 1 is that by spreading the costs of the Chaska Interceptor over a larger area, the impact on any individual property is reduced. ALTERNATIVE NO. 2 Alternative No. 2 allows for including the costs associated with the Chaska Interceptor in the trunk sewer charges for that area tributary to the interceptor. The remaining area outside of the Chaska Interceptor service area would be charged a trunk fee based on the trunk sewers in their area, without paying a portion of the Chaska Interceptor. Discussion -Alternative No. 2 Alternative No. 2 is basically following the current Special Assessment Policy which allows for assessing the costs for a facility directly to the benefitting area. In this case the assessments for the trunk and interceptor sewers take the form of a trunk fee. 2 • Although this alternative is in line with the Assessment Policy; it does not follow what has been done historically. The City currently has two interceptor sewers,the Shakopee Interceptor(from L16 to Blue Lake) and the Prior Lake Interceptor (see attached map). The "VIP Interceptor" is a City owned and constructed facility which, although is referred to as an interceptor, more closely fits the definition of a trunk sewer. For this reason the VIP Interceptor is not considered in this comparison. In the past, interceptor sewer service has been provided to properties in Shakopee at no direct cost to the property owners, as neither the Shakopee Interceptor nor the Prior Lake Interceptor costs were passed on to the City. The Metropolitan Council constructed and paid for both of these facilities. With the Chaska Interceptor the rules have been changed, and the City is required, for the first time, to pay for capacity in an interceptor sewer. The equity issue then becomes should the properties benefitting from the Chaska Interceptor have to pay for that facility, when no other properties in Shakopee have paid for an interceptor sewer. A financial analysis of Alternative No. 2 is included in the Appendix on Page 2. This analysis compares the trunk sewer charges in the area tributary to the Chaska Interceptor to those for the rest of the 2040 MUSA area. The trunk rates for the Chaska Interceptor area include all of the costs associated with the interceptor, as well as trunk lines to serve the area. The relatively high trunk rates for the Chaska Interceptor area pose a problem from a financial impact perspective as well as a logistics standpoint. In order to avoid the City subsidizing the trunk fees to meet the 20 year interceptor payback schedule, (as with Alternative No. 1) the Chaska Interceptor area will have to be fully developed in the next 20 years. The size of the area is roughly that one would expect to develop in 20 years, however, the availability of developable land adjacent to the Prior Lake Interceptor,with substantially lower trunk fees, would tend to pull development away from the Chaska Interceptor area. In order to ensure development in the Chaska Interceptor area, development outside of that area must be controlled by means of MUSA allocations, or a moratorium. Staff also believes that higher development costs will force more expensive housing into the Chaska Interceptor area. In addition, very little commercial/industrial development is anticipated in the interceptor area due to high trunk costs and availability of commercial/industrial property which is already in the MUSA. This would force the down zoning of commercial/industrial property (about 440 acres) within the Chaska Interceptor area if it is to develop in the next 20 years. 3 • ALTERNATIVE NO. 3 In Alternative No. 3, the costs for the Chaska Interceptor are removed from the Trunk Sewer Policy, and dealt with on a City wide basis. Discussion-Alternative No. 3 This approach reflects a policy that interceptor sewers costs are to be funded by the City rather than by a particular drainage area. This provides equity between the areas of the City which already have interceptor sewer service (at no direct cost) and the developing areas of the City which will utilize the Chaska Interceptor, which would also be at no direct cost. Alternative No. 3 has benefits in addition to providing City wide equity. The rates to be charged City wide can be predetermined so as to meet the payback deadlines for the Chaska Interceptor. Funding methods which utilize the Trunk Sewer Policy are dependent upon a certain amount of development occurring within a specific time frame, and provide no guarantee that the funds will be generated by the time the payments are due. Two possible methods of implementing City wide funding have been identified: a property tax increase, or sanitary sewer rate increase. With the property tax option, all properties within the City would be charged based on property value. This option would have the effect of taxing some Shakopee residents for a sanitary sewer who are currently using septic systems. With the sanitary sewer rate increase, the interceptor sewer costs would be spread over all sanitary sewer users, based on an actual generation of effluent. The financial impact of each funding option is shown on Page 3 in the attachments. DMN/pmp TSP 4 ALTERNATIVE NO. 1 Current Trunk Area. Cost Breakdown Principle $4,000,000 Interest $2,500,000 Total $6,500,000 Funding Summary Funds Funds Needed City Sewer Rates to Year Collected for Payment Subsidy Fund Investment 0 0 0 0 0 5 $317,910 $1,000,000 P $1,682,090 $0.44 For years $1,000,000 I 0 through 5 10 $366,760 $1,000,000 P $1,383,240 $0.36 For years $750,000 I 5 through 10 15 $423,120 $1,000,000 P $1,076,880 $0.28 For years $500,000 I 10 through 15 20 $488,130 $1,000,000 P $761,870 $0.20 For years $250,000 I 15 through 20 25 - 50 $4,904,080 N/A 0 Totals $6,500,000 $6,500,000 $4,904,080 ASSUMPTIONS * 50% of first 5 year period trunk charges are specified for Chaska Interceptor * Growth rate of 2.9% * Funds collected are Chaska Interceptor funds only. Trunk sewer costs have been excluded. * Sewer rates are based on dollars per 1000 gallons Page 1 ALTERNATIVE NO. 2 Chaska Interceptor Area Trunk Sewer Charges for the Chaska Interceptor Area Net Unit Flow Total Total Cost Acres Rate Capacity Cost Per Acre Single Family 1503.75 800.00 1203000 $6,979,262 $4,641 Milti-Family 110.99 2200.00 244178 $1,416,610 $12,763 Total 1614.74 3000 1447178 $8,395,872 Total Cost = $8,395,872 Cost per gallon capacity = $5.80 Note: Costs for the Chaska Interceptor comprise 56% of the total trunk charges. Trunk Sewer Charges outside of the Chaska Interceptor Area Net Unit Flow Total Total Cost Acres Rate Capacity Cost Per Acre Single Family 3103.83 800.00 2483064 $2,633,000 $848 Milti-Family 0.00 2200.00 0 $0 $0 Business 603.29 1500.00 904935 $959,578 $1,591 Total 3103.83 3000 2483064 $2,633,000 Total Cost = $2,633,000 Cost per gallon capacity = $1.06 Page 2 ALTERNATIVE NO. 3 City Wide Interceptor Funding Trunk Sewer Charges Without Chaska Interceptor Costs Net Unit Flow Total Total Cost Acres Rate Capacity Cost Per Acre Single Family 4169.66 800.00 3335728 $5,926,277 $1,421 Milti-Family 100.99 2200.00 222178 $394,723 $3,909 Business 1041.21 1500.00 1561815 $2,774,731 $2,665 Total 4270.65 3000 3557906 $6,321,000 Total Cost = $6,321,000 Cost per gallon capacity = $1.78 Page 3 ALTERNATIVE 3b Proposed Shakopee Residential Monthly Billing Increase over Monthly Condition Flow Rate Present Rate Rate Current Rates $1.42 $0.00 $11.12 Hold Status Quo - No Chaska Interceptor $1.43 $0.11 $15.15 Hold status quo - with Chaska Interceptor $1.88 $0.56 $17.40 Update San. Sewer fund - No Chaska Interceptor $1.77 $0.45 $16.85 Solvent San. Sewer fund - With Chaska Interceptor $2.21 $0.89 $19.05 Notes: 1. Current Rates include a $4.00 flat fee per month 2. Proposed Rates include an $8.00 flat fee per month Comparison with other Communities City Monthly Rate Flow Rate Flat Rate Burnsville $11.15 $2.23 ---- Chanhassen $17.33 $2.60 $4.33 Eagan $8.70 $1.61 $6.02 Farmington $18.33 ---- $18.33 Hopkins $12.50 $2.50 ---- Rosemount $13.12 $1.35 $6.37 Savage $12.90 $1.75 $4.40 Woodbury $12.21 $1.57 $8.55 Notes: 1. Monthly rates based on 5000 gallons per month. 2. Quarterly fees have been converted to monthly equivalents. Page 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 to O 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO CO 0 0 1-- T r CO 0) I. 0 N T Cr) 0 0 CD O N CO co N 6 CO 6 CO O O N O N. T CO if CD CO CO CD O) to CO 0) N. EA N. N_ N N N to to to to T T T T 64 EA EA 64 , ae 64 64 (04 00 0 0 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 to O O O O O O O co CO O O T CCS O) co_ to O r O T O O co 69 co n Cr) T CD O to to O a) O CO O CD CD N N. N CD CO d0• 0N r- 64 ER Eft te N.. T^ r r T^ 00 0 0 0 0 O to 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO co 0 0 .-- n n Cr) Cr) CO V' 0 0 CO CO 0 0 0 O) CL) I r CO T O O N N. to O) O CO c� O O cf d .-- O O N CO CO N O CO T CD ER CO r 0) N CD CO C Cr) to CO T T T 69 64 ER E9 r 64 EA EA 69- (� Ea L L)... O 0 0 0 0 0 O O to 0 0 a 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO CO 0 0 ‘- a) a) CO CA N. C.) 0 CD CO O O r 0 0 O O to N. to CO NI N. O) O r L a) co co CO Cr) I. N T CO CO to Cr) = a) T O 69 O r CD N 0) CD N to T /� +.. _ 69 EA 64 64 _ H} V C EA T T v 4- 4- co - al . CO 0 0 0 to 0 U) 0 to 0 0 U) CZ C/) CO 0 CO T 0 CO N CO 0 0 T '^ to CO O CO_ N 0 CO CO ck 0 O to V J .0 (7,97N. O N o to r to Ct O) O d• 0 to LO O O CO CO O) r to to O) CD Z3 0 T EA to T 0En 604 T O 0 2 Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o II N. 0 I. U) 0 CO 0 N O 0 CO to 0 to CD d [t Cr) CO O O r +••� d' N O N M CO O) to O O) O CO c ' 0 ti to N N N N N 0) d• O 0 CC Cr) N ER CO 0 to N N O) 0 O CD r r r Ea Ea T r te ER 0 64 Ef} Ef} Ef} Ej} LL trl C (.3 2T 0 C r 0 t/) O. C _j N C) as co N ^ r a) O O 1 A C `a, ca `- coa. C� a) Qami N Q. —' c O . O N L = X e i O N U U -p t� .0 a) y V C W CD a, ` 2) N C > a) U '- a) ' > C C C a) = a co Q td a) 3 u) „ a O c0 cd C `c y m v C H iii_ ctt Y Y .- C Cl) C E CCI C MI S. a13) -2 -C >_ 8x - I— ODUoC W IA 0 m QO m Page 5 0 0 O 000 O O N N O O 07 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 CO CO O O .-- co a) T O 1- O O O 1. 0 CO O O CO O C) N CO. N O' O O CO U) W 0) O O 0) a) co to d' O O co d' co Co a) U) co 0) r 69 N N O N N d' 0 1.0 U) U) U) r N N to 64 0 E E7 3 69 T}v(19 69 T9 T9 0 O O O O O O O N N O O 00 O O co co O O O O co CO co O .- xi d' N CO U) O O T O O O O CA 6g CO O) U) d- cc; O O CO CO U) O) O M 0) CO co N O O N d' CO co Oto O O 69 - N N'^ N �d' U) 0 d' U) 0 T N N +- 69 69 C!? E T T 69 T 69 a 69 69 64 69 O O 0 0 000 O N N 00 C70 O O 0 0 O O O 0 CO 00 O O v-- II 11 O) 1.0 d' d' O O O 0 0) 0) O O 0 0) N- CA O 6 T 666 T coN U 1� CD O O N as 0) CO cD to N- 000 N O ) d' Ir r C) 69 O r NEA co 69 CM 69 O U) co co T N r - `i T T T O �} 69 69 69 Cf? 69 ++ ti: CDO O O O O O O N N O O 0 V O O O O O O O co CO O O T s_ r_ C0 CO 0 0 to d_ 0) O O 0 O " CO U) C') 00 N- O 1 ctr U) N- O) O T O co co to co O N U) CO O co r = C r Co CA r NEA 609 O O N 1.11 69- 69 0T T T T T T Cti lfl cfl tf} 64 FA bF} (i) .. cn ate,, CO 1'- O N- to O O N 0 N O O 0 al ' CO N 0 N. T 0 0 CO N CO 0 0 T .4-+ „� CO O CO N 0 0 CO CO d_ O O to CO 0 ({- L0 V O d' 'a O to to to O) O N. O O U) to O O co co O) Cr;D U) to d CO 13 ...0 0) 69 co T N d' CA C) O - to CO O ++ 69 E!> 69 (d41 ^ v/ i Sy /1 O O 0 0 O O O O O O O 11 N O N. U) 0 co 0 N O O CO U) O U) CO d_ d^ Cf) CO O O r O ++ d• N O N C'r) CO Q) to to C) O Cr) co CA N- U) N N N N N O) d U) 0 CC CD N 69 M O U) NN O) 0_ U) CO i-4- 'T^ T 64 n T^ 'T^ V4 te 0 vT oT U) LL c cj c _ O c C45 T >+ co ca .O- N °- C_n us N_ U c0 a)a) y O O J U c a) Q. Q a) a) a) S n a) c 0 a) y c� O Q U U Q .0 CU _ O co 0 = W N N °) UU) U cd ate) U L a) to U c '5 c > ~ u' a) �c > c c c 8 5 0 cd < cU C) c co Y c co Co c E co O Q . _C >_ x X cd cd C.) O- CO F- ODUE W W U 00 < O m Page 6 O O 0 0 0 0 r T O O .r- 0 O O 0 0 0 0 CO CO O O CO CO N. U) N- 0 CO CO d_ O O Cr 0) O O T N O Co r O 0) O ,-- 0) O co 0) co d' co N. r 0) 0) U) d' O 0 69. r N N CO U) r U) U) K} T ^ N N T r N 1- 69. 69. 69 69 Ef3 Ea 69 0 O O 0 0 0 0 T T O O 0) 0 O O 0 0 0 0 (.0 CO O O CY) W N d' co U) O T U) CO O O CI) 1 EH T CD N. Cr; Or O T O) O 1- O 0) U) V O N. 1 . dr' CO U) N O) 69 O N N U) 0) U) �t U) U) T 69 69 T N T te 69 E9 T T 69 69 69 69 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 O T T 0 0 O O O 0 0 O O 0 CO CO O O CO II V' U) 0) O O U) 0 U) O O cl• (p CD 6 T O O O r O O O CD CI O O) N N. N. O O O d' N. U) CO C cc T CO 69 0) r 0) N 69-663 6699 N CO CO 664 69- Tri; 69 69 64 69 L.- LL O O ti OO O 0 0 0 r r 0 O 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 c0 co 0 0 CY) - a) 't CO N. CO 0 [t U) 0 O O 0) 0 O cO O CO 1� U) v• cDT D7 O R c i 0) O N. N C) N ED N. 4- co U) ti co 69 co r CD 69 r N Nu) U) LL l-' T T 69 T T T C 9 T ff3 E9 69 69 69 L N CO 0 CO U) 0 r 0 T O O Cn a) N U) 0 U) T 0 d• N CO O O CO O O O N O CO co co O O CY) T Yi 69 O O O r7 U) O U) CO U) O N CD U NA to N. 0 CO CO 0) N. U) U) CO co r N. 6 - T T 0) T T U) U) C _ 69 69 69 _ _ 69 63 0 69 Fi3 69 69 69 .i Ez O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O O ii N. 0 N. U) 0 CO 0 N O O CO U) 0 U) CO d' d' CO CO O O r- .92 92 d' N O N cr CO 0) U) U) O O CY) CSS 0) N U) N N N N N 0) tt U) 0 CC 0 N 69 COO U) N N 0) 0 U) CO ^ T T T 69e T 099 r 69 v 0 Ff3 Ef3 6} U, U, LL Y (7 C 0 C T r _ •` . >, O N p- C .1-, as N V as co CV s_ s_ sO J >+ c T ` N CV CV CV �O Q 0 0 Cl) 0 a) C2 0- a a) C X i N U U Ei 17 CCS .c U_ co U W ` 5 c > a) O ._. a) Y > c c c a) 5 0 c� Q c� 0) a`) a� � a) •� 0 Cts c :se"0 co m v .:P_ 0 L c E � c as p d .0 > x' X c� -cif U 0- cd F— O O O W W 0 CO < O m Page 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N. N- 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ct v 0 0 r CO 0) I- 0 0 0 Co N '0_ 0 0 [t CA CO CO . Cfl N O O O 6 0 O) O tri O) 0 CO.: M [t 0 0 CD CD M CD 0) tO r O tOr CD N O N N EA N r to tO Er) 1- CV EA N r '- EA. EA v N N r 'ft EA Ef3 EA EA EA EA. EA O O O O O O O 0 N- N- 0 0 N- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 'd' 0 0 d CD M N r tO 0 0 CO CO N 0 0 N EA M CD O CD O O M CD O O) 0 r C0)A Co Co N- 0 0 N. O CO M Co to A C r U) Eft Nr.. N N N N- tt N cr to r N N r EA EAT N .r-- EA EA 69 69 EA EA 63 EA O O O O 000 O N. N. O O M II 0 0 0 O O O O O .4- O O CO T.'' V. 0 0 0 M 0) CD 0 0 Cr) a) N O N M r O O O Co d Co CA O N ++ c. M N. co co N O O O O co N- tO CA C CC r N 69 M r N 0) N r tO ,:r co_ tO Q) 1.-, EA EA EA 63 to EA rEA TEA 6} 69 O a 00 0 0 co 0 0 N- N- 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 "0 0 0 d' nt 0 0 tO .� i co M 0 0) M 0 0 0 Cr) o) 0 0 0 N 0). r N O tO C) tO Cl) O • CO N. <') O N N r co tO N E1r EA N r N CO N Ch M N to N r N N r 69 69 EA r r r EA 69 EA Ef3 Ef3 EA 6? EA m 1 C r N 0 N too O N- O N. O O M Q) N 0 [t r 0 0 N N Nt O O tO N M 0 C) N 0 0 r Co 0) 0 0 0 0 EA In o) O 0 0 to O M to O M CD cl) M co O O O Co N O r tO tO CO 0) CD co O FAN r N [t M 0) M r tO CO • ++ T C\I N T CA EA EA FA T r Eft EA EA EA EA EA EA 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O II N- 0 N- to 0 Co 0 N 0 0 Co U1 O _ to ED rt [t M Co 0 0 r a) d' N O N M Co CA tO to C) O M CCS 0 N- tO N N N N N M 'd' tO 0 CCCS) N EA M 0 III N N 0) 0 tO CD r r EA v3 r EAr EA 69 O EA EA EA 69- 69 L N C a) ca C r T _ L .. L., M 0 . y d C N cd N "C) Cd co W `- `' J 5; 2 r G) C Q d o Cco C) , CV co U) C) p C) C) 2 C1 U) 0 a 0 C) L = x i ,_ cp c1) V U 'ea -o a) .c CD j V C W a) a) L.) C)) 6 C > a U a) .Y > c c c o 0 0 Es cam Cl) a) ` Q o t) U) c 5 co CO v c.)) 0 C I— 1- Cl) N C C) E C C I— ca 0 0 0 (C x x 0 m < O m Page 8 10 w • ■ o - i. - - 1 1 i I 11. :M. L, , / c-‘:1 iiiiil „ ...„, 1 , . ,,, , t., c,, ..„ , , tAl \ it --- f1' '\ h , c ' cr, 1 .� o �_ 0.1 . illiw 11. y11 I Cli / I 1 ift t ......___, h '',, rr : '..4• .,_._.__, .4 _ i ..., r 4,..,.. _,,r,,,-- It, Niar_ ,. . , , . .g..:, . ,,, __, A 1 • \ t/))) \I 1 \\ ,�!; „IFI•,N ., 1 / 1 / I1 Z 'It \ Ili0i4 1 lit'14, .i W--4-: l'' I ---- i;IiIii.All:iit .141N N - //,' 1 : - Iti; 0 4 ---- ---- :,01! 451. s 018s81 .1:::: A i - . 1 i 1/. 1- \. ►_!ter • 1..........C1) . \y/' ri ma ,i 7 NiLsml . .'"7:-. 0' F `t It'. 4/ss . t. p. Ifi,tor_. . 111:6,..d Atii.. NN 1 1 i 1111/4.111,44!,, p,.. k\ \-, i al4C<I,.ti':'” V4040- .. 1 '41'' *A l '41 , 4.,At ' 1 , ' \! (141 Tij i zcii: 4.,.. ;,&11,Akk, L , ;:." '" -4 -Ikk i/, _....., _ iiii,i. .i. Lt. .,..,._ '0A1ML.'. : 8 1 g 7 ki il biA ii.•Iii1;11.10..111",. pi( r LIM%A Ifb r4 i Tittirs‘ pp, _ . ,, _. ,,,._ ,, rj. .. .. . a►ir:'16.111:= ` � t r 4'1 [ \% 11. II 1,.,„„„\,..,..,,,..‘,,...,,.....,...„,1I :I ..I ♦ ♦• g • • • ! I1 I\ •Cr) ` '_ J \ O Yp5 �.11jj1• '11`li t �•1�1�t Q¢ 11`I '- ` ' 0\\l Z. V x,,,„1..1 ,���1►-.1 �IrC,. ! h \, "I!� c- it y .(( 1 � . 1 $ 1�11 '1�+fit, `� (S Y I 1-4--1 .-e'''llA 4 `,:,-..(a,--!Ii..q. Ifjk, 4S /22 8, ,+ ,� �i �` rat _ I11 / i . \ ''‘ dr: \\ I r: \/'' k vv\ , \ \ '',..... ,�� T (1 I ,I w ,••,.. O \ ilf / �� ` 1 w 7 „„m...... .„.....„me,t, CI ' w .. , v1 K• th96-111IOOMOi\ NRYIVIMW1'10 • MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Lindberg S. Ekola, Planning Director RE: New Zoning Map - Phase II MEETING DATE: November 9, 1994 INTRODUCTION: On June 7, 1994, the Shakopee City Council adopted Ordinance No. 377 which approved the new zoning ordinance text. In order to make the provisions in the new zoning ordinance text effective, a new zoning map for the City is needed. The Planning Commission reviewed the new zoning map at a public hearing at its November 3, 1994, meeting. The Planning Commission's recommendations are included in this memo. BACKGROUND: The new zoning ordinance text replaced the previous ordinance which was initially adopted in 1979. The old ordinance was seriously out of date with current development trends. Copies of the new zoning ordinance text have been distributed to the City Council. The previous or old zoning ordinance had eleven underlying zoning districts. The new zoning ordinance has thirteen underlying zones. The following is a list of the districts from the old zoning ordinance and the zones in the new ordinance: OLD ZONING ORDINANCE NEW ZONING ORDINANCE Ag Agricultural Ag Agricultural Preservation R-1 Rural Residential RR Rural Residential R-1A Low Density Residential R-2 Urban Residential R-1B Urban Residential R-1C Old Shakopee Residential R-3 Mid-Density Residential R-2 Medium Density Residential R-4 Multi-Family Residential R-3 Multiple Family Residential B-1 Highway Business B-1 Highway Business B-2 Community Business B-2 Office Business B-3 Central Business B-3 Central Business RTD Race Track MR Major Recreation I-1 Light Industrial I-1 Light Industrial I-2 Heavy Industrial I-2 Heavy Industrial 1 The old and new zones listed above are in an order which places comparable districts and zones on the same line. The abbreviation or prefix system for each district has changed primarily in the residential districts. For example, the old R-1 district is now labeled RR (Rural Residential) zone. The provisions in the RR zone were based on the old R-1 district regulations. The old R- 2,Urban Residential District,has been divided into three separate zones (R-1A,R-1B, and R-1C). A portion of the new zoning map for the City has already been adopted. Staff has referred to this as the Phase I portion of the City's new zoning map. The Phase I zoning for the existing Light and Heavy Industrial areas was adopted earlier to help meet the pressing needs of several projects in the industrial area. It should be noted that the two new industrial zones are similar in content as the two old zoning districts. No changes in zone locations occurred with the Phase 1 process. The Phase I zoning map was adopted by the City Council on August 16, 1994 and has since become effective after its publication in the official newspaper. Attached with this memo are several items for the consideration by the Committee of the Whole on the new zoning map: EXHIBIT ITEM Exhibit A District summaries from the old zoning ordinance (blue) Exhibit B Zone summaries from the new zoning ordinance (green) Exhibit C Existing zoning map Exhibit D Proposed zoning map Exhibit E 1980 Land Use Plan Exhibit F 1990 Land Use Plan Exhibit G Gilbertson Letter Amendments changing the boundaries of any zones on the zoning map or changing the regulations in the zoning ordinance text requires an affirmative vote of 4/5 of the City Council. Amendments to the zoning ordinance are to be based on several criteria. The criteria for map or text amendments are as follows: 1. That the original zoning ordinance is in error. 2. That significant changes in the Community goals and policies have taken place. 3. That significant changes in the City-wide or neighborhood development patterns have occurred. 4. That the Comprehensive Plan requires a different provision. 2 DISCUSSION: The new zoning map will translate the districts from the old zoning map into the appropriate new zones for all areas of the City (except the already completed Phase I areas). The following discussion will be broken down into those areas north of the bypass by land use as well as the areas south of the bypass. All areas identified in this listing have been recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. Areas North of the Bypass Industrial and Major Recreation: 1. I-1 North of CR 16, West of CR 17 The new zoning map is proposing to maintain the comparable I-1 zone for the parcels in this location which have an existing I-1 zoning designation. Some of the properties in this area include Shakopee Towing, the commercial self-storage facility, the forklift and auto repair businesses as well as several vacant parcels. 2. I-2 South of 3rd Avenue, West of Pierce Street There are two existing businesses along the south side of 3rd Avenue currently zoned I-2. The new zoning map would propose the same I-2 zone for both businesses. 3. I-1 North of the Shakopee Bypass, East of Phase 1 Zoning The existing zoning is I-1 and the new zoning map also would propose the new I-1 zone. 4. Shakopee Bypass Right-of-Way Staff recommends that entire Bypass right-of-way be zoned Agricultural in order to provide the City an opportunity to reconsider the appropriate land use controls for surplus MNDOT properties at a later date. The eastern portion of the Bypass right-of-way is currently zoned I-1. 5. Former Danny's Construction Site North of CR 16 The City Council adopted Resolution No. 4066 which approved the purchase of the remnant parcel of the former Danny's Construction site from MNDOT after the completion of the bypass project. The Comprehensive Plan guided the site for racetrack and commercial uses. The June 7, 1994 zoning ordinance provides a new zone, the Major Recreation (MR) zone, which will effectively implement the land use goals established in the Comprehensive Plan for the site. The new zoning map proposes MR for this site. 6. Canterbury Downs and surrounding Racetrack District (RTD) zoned properties Staff would recommend that all previously zoned RTD areas be incorporated in the new MR zone. The new zone provides more flexibility in terms of commercial and entertainment land uses for this area than the previous RTD. 3 7. Valleyfair Valleyfair is currently zoned I-2. Staff is recommending the Valleyfair site (approximately 230 acres) be zoned Major Recreation as discussed by the Committee of the Whole in the text review process. Valleyfair has submitted a PUD application to the City for review and approval. The timing and coordination of the new zoning map and PUD review process will provide Valleyfair and the City with the appropriate zoning direction. 8. Murphy's Landing Staff is proposing that this City owned property be placed in the Major Recreation zone. Public recreation is a permitted use in the MR zone. The MR zone would provide greater latitude in the recreational/entertainment opportunities than the current Agricultural zoning provides. Business: 1. B-1, General Business The new zoning text merged the old B-1 (Highway Business) and B-2 (Community Business) into one B-1 zone. The primary change from the old map onto the new map is to change the B-2 parcels located around the 4th Avenue/CR 17 intersection to B-1 zoning. Another B-1 zoning change is proposed for land up to the MNDOT ROW west of Taylor Street and south of the Shakopee Town Square Mall. Old B-1 designations under MNDOT acquisition for the Bloomington Ferry Bridge project are proposed to go to Agricultural. All other previous old B-1 parcels would be B-1 on the new zoning map. 2. B-2, Office Business The B-2 (Office Business zone) is a new zone in the City. The purpose of the zone is to provide areas within the City which allow offices and related services. General retail activities are not allowed. Two areas have been proposed on the new zoning map. One area would be for the old St. Francis Hospital and the Scott County Courthouse. The parking lot on Block 57 in between the Courthouse and the hospital would also be included. The second B-2 area is located east of CR 17 and south of the Junior High School. Other areas for B-2 zoning will be established after the Comprehensive Plan is completed. 3. B-3, Central Business The new zoning map proposes the same configuration for the new B-3 zone as on the old map. After the Comprehensive Plan update and the Downtown planning effort is established, the boundaries of the B-3 zone will be reconsidered. 4 Residential: 1. R-1A No R-1A zoning is proposed at this time. This zone will be used in areas south of the Bypass after the appropriate Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) expansions. 2. R-1B The new R-1B zone would cover the old R-2 areas generally south of 10th Avenue or east of CR 17. The old R-2 subdivisions east of CR 17 and south of CR 16 tend to have 80 and 85 foot wide lots. A large majority of the building permit surveys on file with the Building Department indicated that structures were built in conformance with the 10 foot sideyard setback requirement. The single family portion of the Prairie Bend PUD is proposed for R-1B also. 3. R-1C Exhibit D (Urban) illustrates the pattern proposed for the R-1C zone locations. The R-1C zone is proposed to be generally located north of 10th Avenue and west of CR 17. Staff analyzed existing lot sizes and the number of setback variance requests in the established residential neighborhoods to define the R-1C areas more closely. In addition, staff researched numerous building permit files for survey information on typical setbacks constructed in many of the urban area residential subdivisions. Since the Presidential subdivisions on the west side of CR 15 and north of 12th Avenue tended to have 75 foot wide lots with less than 10 foot sideyard setbacks, staff is recommending that the R-1C zone extend to these areas. A cursory count on variances from the current planning database revealed ten requests for sideyard setback variances for this area over the past 14 years. 4. R-2 The old R-3 (Mid Density Residential) district is being translated into the new R-2 zone (Medium Density Residential). Essentially all previous R-3 zoned areas are being zoned into the new R-2 zone. The twinhome portion of the new Orchard Park subdivision along the Shakopee Bypass is proposed as being in R-2 on the new map. This zoning would more accurately reflect the proposed development which was approved by the City Council for the Orchard Park preliminary plat. Other potential twinhome projects are being considered by developers along the Bypass where the old R-2 zoning exists. Since these projects have not received City Council approval or applications submitted for platting, staff recommends that these areas be zoned R-1B and be rezoned at a later date. 5. R-3 All the old zoned R-4 Areas have been translated in the new R-3 Multiple Family Residential zone. The multi-family portions of the Prairie Bend PUD have been proposed for the new R-3 zone. The old and new correctional facility sites have been included with the R-3 zone due to their size and configuration. 5 6. Cemeteries The three existing cemeteries in the urban area have been proposed for Agricultural zoning. Cemeteries are listed as a conditional use in the Agricultural zone as well as most of the residential zones. The Agricultural zoning will assist in the land supply calculations with the Met Council and should not interfere with the operations of the three existing cemeteries. Areas South of the Bypass Industrial: 1. I-1 East and West of Dean Lake At the October 25, 1994 COW meeting,the City Council members reviewed the proposed goals, objectives and policies for the 1994 Comprehensive Plan. The City Council established the direction that the existing I-1 industrial zoning in this location should not be replaced with the Agricultural zone due to legal implications. Staff was also directed to revise the Comprehensive Plan policies to state that no new areas of commercial or industrial zoning will be created in the rural service area. The new zoning map proposes to provide the comparable new I-1 zoning for the East and West Dean Lake areas. 2. I-1 North of 13th Avenue and East of CR 18 The RV campground in this location is currently zoned I-1. Staff is proposing that if the site is not purchased by MNDOT for Bypass right-of-way, the site should be zoned Major Recreation. Business: 1. B-1 North of CR 16, East and West of CR 83 Two parcels in this location are currently zoned B-1. Neither are in the MUSA at this time. Based on the City Council direction for the rural industrial (east and west of Dean Lake), staff is proposing the comparable new B-1 zone be provided for these parcels. Rural Residential/Agricultural: In an effort to implement the Metropolitan Council's rural density policy of one dwelling per ten acres, the Shakopee City Council adopted an interim ordinance on January 18, 1994. This interim ordinance limited land divisions in the rural service area within Shakopee to no less than ten acres in size. The interim ordinance will expire on January 18, 1995. Adopting the new zoning map for the rural areas is necessary before this expiration. The adoption of the new zoning map will satisfy one of the Metropolitan Council's principal concerns with the City. 1. Existing Rural Residential Developments The approach that staff has taken in the new zoning map has been to put all developed or platted parcels into the RR (rural residential) zone. Please refer to Exhibit D. 6 2. Rural Sections Exceeding 1/10 Density In all the rural sections where the density exceeds the Metropolitan Council's one dwelling per ten acres policy,parcels which have not been platted or developed in a rural residential development have been placed into the Agricultural zone. Since these sections exceed the density policy (Sections 9, 13, 18, 19,24,30,32) already,any further divisions of land will only exasperate the City's problems with the Metropolitan Council. 3. Rural Sections Not Exceeding the 1/10 Density, Properties Previously Zoned Agricultural The parcels of property previously in the Agricultural District have all been translated in to the new Agricultural zone. 4. Rural Sections Not Exceeding the 1/10 Density, Properties Previously Zoned Rural Residential The parcels of property previously in the Rural Residential District in sections where the rural density (1/10) has not been exceeded, have been placed into the Rural Residential Zone. Staff would advise the Committee of the Whole that Sections 17, 30 and 31 are nearing their density capacity of 64 units within the 640 acre sections. Overlay Zones: The new zoning ordinance text established five overlay zones including Floodplain, Shoreland, Mining,Planned Unit Development,and the Old Shakopee Business. Staff suggested that the Old Shakopee Business overlay zone be merged into the B-1 zone regulations. The Planning Commission needed additional time to review the Old Shakopee Business overlay. They will forward a recommendation at a later date. 1. Floodplain Staff proposes that the same Floodplain boundaries be provided for on the new zoning map as established on the current map. Staff would note that the floodplain map amendment for Valleyfair which deleted the floodplain designation within the dyke will be incorporated into the new zoning map. 2. Shoreland The old Zoning Ordinance established the Shoreline District as an underlying district.The new Zoning Ordinance establishes the Shoreland Overlay zone. There are four areas of shoreland on the old zoning map. Staff recommended that the Agricultural zone be established as the underlying zone with the Shoreland Overlay zone be placed with the same Shoreline boundaries. Mr. Jon Albinson requested that the Planning Commission continue discussions on the underlying and overlay zoning in the Dean Lake area. The Planning Commission agreed to this request and will address the issue at their December meeting. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the Agricultural underlaying zone and the 7 Shoreland overlay zone for the three other areas. 3. Mining There are three approved mining operations in the City including the Shiely quarry, the Fischer Aggregates mine west of CR 83, and the Ames mine on Valley View Road. The Planning Commission could either recommend that the new zoning map be drawn to include the existing mines within overlay zones, or, review the overlay zone requests at a later date as individual requests after the new zoning map is adopted. 4. Planned Unit Development (PUD) With the development of the Racetrack District in 1986, the City Council adopted an ordinance requiring mandatory PUD approval for all RTD zoned properties as well several surrounding parcels zoned B-1 or I-1 near Canterbury Downs. Staff is proposing a similar mandatory PUD boundary on the new zoning map at this time. Following the Comprehensive Plan approval, deletions of the mandatory PUD requirement may be considered with the appropriate zoning changes. Pending Development Areas: There are several properties in the urban service area which are currently in the Agricultural zoning district. The Planning commission reviewed these properties and provided a recommendation for each area. The recommendations are listed below: 1. Gilbertson Request Darwin and Arlis Gilbertson submitted a letter (Exhibit G) requesting that the Planning Commission consider the rezoning of their properties located along County Road 16. The old zoning map designation is Urban Residential (R2). They are requesting zoning which would allow up to a 4-plex facility or the new Mid-Density Residential (R2). The Planning Commission recommended to not include this request in the Phase II zoning map process. Rather, it would be more appropriate for this amendment to be submitted for formal application by the Gilbertsons so that a more thorough analysis of the request could take place. 2. 20 Acre Parcel Northwest of the Community Center The Planning Commission recommended that this property be placed into the R-1B zone. 3. Community Center/High School The Planning Commission recommended that these properties also be placed into the R-1B zone. 8 4. Homestead Ridge, Parcels Near the Bypass The City Council has proposed a preliminary plat for this subdivision. The preliminary plat indicated larger lots designed for mid density residential development on the portion of the subdivision closest to the Bypass. The Planning Commission recommended that these lots be placed into the R-2 zone. 5. Meadows Subdivision, Outlot A The Planning Commission recommended that this 8 to 10 acre parcel near the bypass be zoned R-2. 6. Undeveloped Outlots in Prairie Estates Subdivision The Prairie Estates Subdivision is located west of CR 17 and north of the Bypass. The outlot in this subdivision south of Vierling Drive is planned for commercial uses as is a smaller portion north of Vierling Drive. Mid density residential and single family residential were shown on the preliminary plat for the outlots north of vierling Drive. The Planning Commission recommended that the zoning for these parcels be reviewed at a later date under a separate application. Some concerns on the lack of information on the proposed zoning were raised by area residents at the Planning Commission public hearing. 7. Vacant Parcel South of Gorman Street, West of Shakopee East Apartments The Planning Commission recommended that the rezoning to the R-3 (Multi Family) for a pending project be processed at a later date. The old zoning is B-i, the new zoning translation would be the B-1 zone. 8. Shenandoah Ballroom The Planning Commission recommended that the property for the ballroom be placed into the B-1 zone. 9. Old Race Track District West of Shenandoah The Planning Commission recommended that the parcels west of Shenandoah be placed into the Major Recreational zone. This area will be reviewed after the Comprehensive Plan is complete. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval to the City Council of the proposed Phase II zoning map as recommended by staff. 2. Make specific changes to the proposed Phase II zoning map and recommend its approval to the City Council. 3. Table a recommendation on the zoning map for additional information. 9 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve a motion which would recommend to the City Council approval of the Phase II new zoning map. LES/pmp Zoning.CC 10 NEW ZONING MAP AREAS FOR ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATION COMMITTE OF THE WHOLE NOVEMBER 9, 1994 Murphy's Landing Old Zoning: Agricultural (Floodplain) Recommended New Zoning: Major Recreational (Floodplain) Alternatives: 1. Place site into the new Agricultural zone with the appropriate Floodplain Overlay zone. 2. Create a new Institutional zone for public uses in the City and place all public properties into this zone including the subject site. 3. Leave site in the Major Recreation zone and add appropriate use restrictions on the property at the time of a sale, if it is ever sold by the City. Canterbury Downs and Surrounding Properties Old Zoning: Racetrack District (Mandatory PUD) Recommended New Zoning: Major Recreation (Mandatory PUD) Alternatives: 1. Leave the old Race Track District zoning in place with the mandatory PUD until after the Comprehensive Plan update is completed and the new zoning pattern can be established based on the new land use plan. 2. Adopt a text amendment for the Major Recreation zone which would establish ampitheaters as a conditional or planned unit use and establish requirements for a minimum lot size and distance to residential uses. 3. Place only the Canterbury Downs site into the Major Recreational zone. Place all other surrounding parcels into the desired new residential, commercial and industrial zones. ((:\wp51\newzone.cow) 1 1 e 241' rti $ • ■ o • • A. 44 VI II • �, WWII 1 w ad s dr • • Als 1 ' w 1 1 3.,_E ; UIV , ..fi , 1\ it- o Cr-i 44 L llik14 t r'44 ‘_1-.4 ;6 r' Y Il O g 8 • ',,,,,. [l1Ili, \ 1 �i 1 ' II 1 4t 1 ,),,....,,.., „.,„,„ ,„ �` . -••••••r. �.. ,V.' 1 W / I /11 t 1 / W I 1 t t ___.________:. 'I i - 11 iqr" ' ' V i 11 7:::)\ OF) ‘• ' kl I * 41: / ' 1 1‘‘.‘• 1.t4ii`S§Iititt•,:m.--, - - '''' Ili Oka. . l'., . lot, :k 0 ,*,--,IN , 1 p.III A 4 it.1 ,40 4: , ii, . , .;;„ 1 ; ,i ,,-q ,k.* . _ _ _fi II:, ) :III I i, ; 111111 4k, . 1 . :11. • tg �I 1,1d 1 '9 ��`�: I I-- ,clip HUH ' Cf) ' ,,T73„„,,,, 1 . ,, • Aii-ikih . 1 . . 04A) i 11111110(tgAiiil " , ; . . - , T. , w.,-,;-.. -.. ,,14--.441-. v.. . , , (:::, § ,, ,,41.,, I \s'il:EN.' vii gt Iti „ ii ... g ( 1 I A'isi .:/?..•:' PT ','''.`14 IM O g ii ^i 4 _� t umlit -A .1N.iki . �a A 1 II► 1}� mg,/ h. •Ir4, 4 1 1;11:‘:‘,111.".11\i 1141,111Z tirik A A 44 I4?4,s4i. 1 iii, -'It ; (:"") 4,\ 4. ,.,„;:•.:•,/, .',!..,:e7=-9t 47,1,:,, 4.1 C �1 it f..'il`�' �i l.•• , :, .1-,43.0 .. 7 ` gi ) I,d ..At 1 . ` (f) 11 '1H+t'I''x:111! .IIIc— tilI\ �` O! /��` 1 \ 1111 �,I,ill 110L.— / - I \ • V1111 1 J=- --��[[ ___ / 1 • 0 :\',:i.1%,.. I ,.jj 1111 11. O 1 \ - / \ f4. .. 1':Aiit Ill.-= LLJ 14 N. �Ir\ i j 7 1 CCgr‘ 1,.) 11 _ _ .r C. LI FAB 1 I 1."4"1 i!liPiAL .\ R isi 8.. ..s,., ' .: . !...„, 4 yi4ii., ...ilitt 14 ,` , ,10114,,4:.1 jiii7..441.2kiss •I '-3 1 rg 1 0 \\ ' / r r J � 1 N W ` \` BMJ .,- -I ,. E•4 C4 / ' <.Ns.N 4/ • W r.Ci S6-90-I11030006L\ 7o1N11W Alava V\a EXHIBIT A Residential Summary Tables Old Zoning Ordinance City of Shakopee, Minnesota 1 . Residential Uses 2. General Requirements Adopted October 25, 1979 Ordinance No. 31 RESIDENTIAL USES X = Permitted AG R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 O = Conditional Agricultural Rural Res. Urban Res. Med.Den. Multi-Fam. Agricultural Land Use X X Agricultural Research 0 Airports 0 0 Animal hospitals and clinics 0 0 Bed & Breakfast Inns O O O Cemeteries 0 0 0 0 0 Churches 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Feedlots 0 Commercial Recreation 0 0 O Community Center X X O Community Residential Facility: 1-6 Persons X X X X 1-16 Persons 0 X Day Care. Class I 0 0 0 0 0 Day Care. Class II X X X X X Dwelling, Two Family X X X Dwellings. Single Family X X X X X Essential Services X X X • X X Farmstead Residences X X Farm Second Home 0 0 Forestry and Nursery X X Funeral Homes 0 0 , Home Occupations --- 0 0 0 0 Hospitals and Clinics _ 0 0 0 Kennels and Riding Academies X 0 Local Government Buildings 0 0 0 0 0 Multi-Family (3-4 Units) X X X Multi-Family (5-6 Units) 0 0 X Multi-Family (6 Units +) X Nursery Schools O Nursing Homes - 0 0 Private Clubs and Lodges 0 Public Recreation X X X X X Residential Group Homes 1-10 Persons 0 0 0 Retails Sales, Nursery 0 Schools 0 0 0 0 0 Seasonal Produce Stands X 0 • (Ord. 31, October 25, 1979) 1993 ed. 1345 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR AG DISTRICTS CITY OF SHAKOPEE pERi i i l ED USES: -Agricultural Land Uses -Farmstead Residences -Forestry & Nurseries -Seasonal Produce Stands -Essential Services -Kennels & Riding Academies -Public Recreation -Single Family Res.: 1 non-farm dwelling per -Class II Daycare Facilities 40 acres on a 2.5 acre lot CONDITIONADUSES: .. ... ...... .. -Commercial Feedlots • -Home Occupations -Cemeteries -Churches -Schools -Commercial Recreation -Airport -Second Home under certain conditions -Local Government Buildings -Structures over 35 ft.in height -Agricultural Research Facilities -Animal Hospitals & Veterinary Clinics -Retail Sales of Nursery & Garden Supplies -Class I Daycare Facilities ( PERT';feii-'AC SORYUSEE; -Any Incidental Machinery, Structure, or Building Necessary to the Conduct of Agricultural Operations or Other Permitted Uses. REOUMED SETBAC -Front Yard:30 ft.' -Lot Area -Side Yard:20 ft. -Farmstead Res.:None -Street Side Yard:30' -Non-Farm Dwelling:2.5 acres -Rear Yard:40 ft. -Building Height: 2.5 stories or 35 ft. -Lot Width (Single Family Detached): 150 ft. ACCFSSORY BUILDNG SETB ACKS:- -Side: 5 ft. -Rear: 5 ft. -Front: 30 ft.(but not closer than the principle building) -Height: 35 ft. (but no higher than the -A 20 ft.setback for a Garage Entrance Directly principle building)3 on an Alley or Street -Shall not be built before principle bldg. -Farm Buildings shall not be erected 100 ft.from -Intensively Used Facilities for Animal neighbor's property line Raising and Care shall not be located within 300 ft.of a neighboring property line FENCES: -Height: -Setbacks: Within front yard setback: 3 ft. On owner's side of property line Within side yard setback abutting a street :3 ft. Abutting a public alley:3 ft from prov.rty line On rest of lot: 6'maximum • 'Other requirements apply when properties abut Collector Streets,Minor Arterials.Principle and Intermediate Arterials "Cannot be located nearer the side or rear lot lines abutting a street than the principal dwelling or closer than the required setback for Rhe principal dwelling.whichever is less. 3Except barns.chimneys.silos. and other such towers NOTE: This summary is not part of the Shakopee 7.oninx Ordinance,and is only for convenience of reference. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR R-1 DISTRICTS CITY OF SHAKOPEE ERINti TED>USES: -Public Recreation -Single Family Detached Residences -Agricultural Land Uses -Forestry and Nurseries -Essential Services -State Licensed Community Residential -Class 11 Daycare Facilities Facilities for Handicapped Persons Cf FDI 'IUN .£: ST -Local Government Buildings -Commercial Recreation -All Home Occupations -Churches -Seasonal Produce Stands -Cemeteries -Schools -Kennels and Riding Academies -Airports -Livestock and Poultry (1 unit per 2.5 acres) -Horses (2 per 2.5 Acres) -Mobile Home (Farmstead-Sec.11.05,Subd.8) -Structure in excess of 35' in height -Animal Hospitals & Veterinary Clinics -Class I Daycare Facilities ?ERMITTED ACCESSORYUSES ...:.:............:...::........:...............::::::............:::.:.::.::::. -Garages -Gardening & Horticultural uses -Fences -Recreational Equipment -Farm Buildings -Stables -One Lodging Room per Single Family Dwelling RE ?UIREPSEITACIM -Minimum Lot Area:2.5 acres -Front Yard:30 ft. 1 -Minimum Lot Width: 150 ft. -Side Yard:20 ft. -Minimum Lot Depth: 200 ft. -Rear Yard:40 ft. -Max.Height: 2.5 Stories or 35 ft. itCCESSORYBUILDING ET AcKS? -Side: 5 ft. • • -Rear: 5 ft. -Front:30 ft. (but not closer than the principle building) -Height:35 ft (but not higher than the -20 ft.Setback for a Garage Entrance Directly on an principle building)' Alley or Street -Shall not be built prior to principle building -Farm Buildings shall not be erected 100 ft. from -Intensively Used Facilities for Animal neighboring property Raising and Care shall not be located within 300 ft.of a neighboring property line N'C -Height: -Setbacks: Within front yard setback: 3 ft. On owner's side of property line Within side yard setback abutting a street :3 ft. Abutting a public alley:3 ft from property line On rest of lot: 6'maximum 'Other requirements apply when properties abut Collector Streets,Minor Arterials,Principle and Intermediate Arterials 'Cannot be located nearer the side or rear lot lines abutting a street than the principal dwelling or closer than the required setback for the principal dwelling,whichever is less. 3Except barns,chimneys.silos, and other such towers NOTE: This summary is not part of the Shakopee.Zoning Ordinance,and is only for convrnience of reference. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR R-2 DISTRICTS CITY OF SHAKOPEE PERMTFTED USES -Two Family Residences -Single Family Detached Residences -Community Centers -Public Recreation -Essential Services -State Licensed Community Residential -Class II Daycare Facilities Facilities for Handicapped Persons CON DTITONAIMSESi -Churches -Local Government Buildings -All Home Occupations -Cemeteries -Hospitals & Clinics -Schools -Funeral Homes -Residential Group Homes' -Structures over 35 ft.in height -Bed & Breakfast Inns'-Class I Daycare Facilities PERMITTED ACCESSORYUSES . -Garages -Fences -Gardening &Horticultural Uses -Recreation Equipment -Off-Street Parking Spaces: Up to 3 per Dwelling Unit REO UTREI•S BA€I S_ -Front Yard:30 ft.3 -Lot Area with City Services: .............. -Side Yard:10 ft. -Single Family:9,000 sq. ft. -Street Side Yard:20 ft. -Two Family:5,500 sq. ft.per unit -Rear Yard:30 ft. -Lot Area without City Services: 20 acres -Height:2.5 Stories or 35 ft. -Lot Width (Two-Family):70 ft. -Lot Width (Single Family):60 ft. -Lot Depth: 100 ft. XeCESSORYIT DING'SETBAC -Side: 5 ft. -Rear:5 ft. -Front: 30 ft. -Height: 35 ft. (but no higher than the -A 20 ft.setback for a Garage Entrance directly on an principle building) Alley or Street -Shall not be built prior to the principal -Shall not exceed 10% of the lot area or exceed square building footage of main floor of principle bldg. FENCES: -Height: -Setbacks: Within front yard setback: 3 ft. On owner's side of property line Within side yard setback abutting a street :3 ft. Abutting a public alley:3 ft from property line On rest of lot: 6'maximum 'Subject to certain conditions "Subject to certain conditions 3Other requirements apply s.hen properties abut Collector Streets.Minor Arterials.Principle and Intermediate Arterials 4Canuwt be located nearer the side or rear lot lines abutting a street than the principal dwelling or closer than the required setback for the principal d%.tilling.whiches er is less. NOTE: This summary is not part of the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance,and is only for convenience of reference. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR R-3 DISTRICTS CITY OF SHAKOPEE PERMITTED USES: ..... ........................ ... . . -Public Recreation -Community Centers -Essential Services -1-4 family residences and townhouses -State Licensed Community Residential Facilities for -Class II Daycare Facilities Handicapped Persons CONI5MONAL U•SESi -Home Occupations -Hospitals and Clinics -Cemeteries -Churches -Schools -Local Government Buildings -Funeral Homes -Nursing Homes -Residential Group Homes' -Community Residential Facilities- -Buildings over 35 ft.in height -Bed & Breakfast' -Multi-Family Dwellings & Townhouses (5-6 units) -Class I Daycare Facilities PERMTE FED ACCESSQRYUSES -Garages -Fences -Gardening & Horticultural Uses -Off-Street Parking Spaces: Up to 3 per dwelling unit OR:ED SET'> ACIS -Single Family Detached -Two Family Dwelling -Lot Area:9,000 sq. ft. -Lot Area per unit: 5,500 sq. ft. -Lot Width:60 ft. -Lot Width:70 ft. -Front Yard:35 ft.' -Multi-Family& Townhouses -Side Yard:10 ft. -Lot Area per unit: 4,000 -Rear Yard:30 ft. -Lot Width: 100 ft. -Height: 2.5 stories or 35 ft. ACCESSORYBT ILDWG SETBACKS: -Side: 5 ft. -Rear: 5 ft. -Front:30 ft. -A 20 ft.Setback for a garage entrance -Height: 35 ft. (but not higher than the principle bldg.)` directly on an Alley or Street -Shall not be built prior to the principle bldg. -Shall not exceed 10%of the lot area or exceed square footage of main floor of principle bldg. PE PCPSi -Height: -Setbacks: Within front yard setback: 3 ft. On owner's side of property line Within side yard setback abutting a street :3 ft. Abutting a public alley:3 ft from property line On rest of lot: 6'maximum 'Subject to certain conditions 'Subject to certain conditions 'Subject to certain conditions 'Other requirements apply when properties abut Collector Streets,Minor Arterials.Principle and intermediate Arterials sCannot be located nearer the side or rear lot lines abutting a strget than the principal dwelling or closer than the required setback for the principal dwelling.whichever is less. `Except chimneys.church spires. and other such towers NOTE: This summary is not part of the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance,and is only for convenience of reference. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR R-4 DISTRICTS CITY OF SHAKOPEE PERNIfFi El)USES: -Townhouses -1-2 Family Residences -Public Recreation -Essential Services -Community Residential Facilities' -Multiple Dwelling bldgs. under 30 ft.in height -Class II Daycare Facilities CONDI TIONAI USES: -Community Centers -Nursing Homes -Nursery Schools -Accessory Offices Retail Sales -Churches -Commercial Recreation -Cemeteries -Hospitals & Clinics -Schools -Local Government Buildings -Residential Group Homes -Structures over 45 ft.in height -Bed & Breakfast' -Private Clubs & Lodges -Multiple Dwelling buildings over 30 ft.in height -Class I Daycare Facilities PERMITTE 7r ACCESSORY: SES -Garages -Fences -Gardening & Horticultural Uses -Off-Street Parking Spaces: Up to 3 per dwelling unit OMEDS BACi S -Front Yard:50 ft.4 -Lot Area (townhouses): 4,000 sq. ft. -Rear Yard:40 ft. -Lot Area(multi-family): -Side Yard:1/2 Height of Bldg.or 15 ft whichever is greater -1 Bedroom:2,400 sq. ft. -Lot Width:100 ft. -2 Bedroom:3,000 sq. ft. -Parking Lot Setback: 15 ft.within Front Yard Setback -3 Bedroom:4,500 sq. ft. -Highrise (30 ft.or Higher): 4 x the height of the structure from the nearest R-1,2,3 District line or principle structure 'ERFOR f.:.0 E STA DARDS 3 -Acceptable Building Materials -Landscaping Requirements -Screening CCESSOR BUI€D G SETBAC :6 -Side 5 ft -Rear:5 ft. -Front:30 ft. -A 20 ft.setback for a garage entrance -Shall not be built prior to the principle bldg. directly on an Alley or Street -Shall not exceed 10% of the lot area or exceed square footage of main floor of principle bldg. FENCES: -Height: -Setbacks: Within front yard setback:3 ft. On owner's side of property line Within side yard setback abutting a street :3 ft. Abutting a public alley:3 ft from property line On rest of lot:6'maximum 'Subject to certain conditions 'Subject to certain conditions 'Subject to certain conditions 40ther requirements apply when properties abut Collector Streets,Minor Arterials,Principle and Intermediate Arterials sSubject to certain conditions 'Cannot be located nearer the side or rear lot lines abutting a street than the principal dwelling or loser than the required setback for the principal dwelling,whichever is less. NOTE: This summary Is not part of the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance,and is only for convenience of reference. EXHIBIT A Business Summary Tables Old Zoning Ordinance City of Shakopee, Minnesota 1 . Business Uses 2. General Requirements Adopted October 25, 1979 Ordinance No. 31 BUSINESS USES X = Permitted 8-1 8-2 B-3 • 0 = Conditional Hiohway Business Community Business Central Bus. Animal Hospitals and Clinics 0 0 O Armory, Exhibition Hall X Assembly Operations - O Auto Sales, Services & Repair X Bed & Breakfast Inns 0 O- Bus Terminals and Taxi Stands O Car Washes- X 0 0 Churches - X . Commercial Recreation 0 O O Cultural and Fraternal Institutions 0 0 0 Day Care. Class I 0 0 0 Day Care. Class II X X X Drive-In Business X Dwellinas Combined w/ Permitted Use 0 0 X Essential Services X X X Essential Utility Ser. Structures 0 Funeral Homes 0 Hospitals and Clinics X Liquor Stores X • 0 X Medical, Dental Clinics X X Motels. Motor Hotels. Hotels X 0 Motor Fuel Stations 0 0 Multiple Dwellings O Newspaper Printing or Publishing 0 O Offices and Banks X X X Open Sales Lots 0 Parking Lots' 0 Private Lodges and Clubs 0 Physical Culture and Dance Studio X X Public Buildinas 0 0 X Restaurants, Class I X X X Restaurants, Class II 0 0 O Retail Business X X X - Service Establishments X X X Supniv Yards 0 Taverns 0 0 X Theater X X Wholesale Business X 0 Iss3 ed. 1346 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR B-1 DISTRICTS CITY OF SHAKOPEE PERMITTED USES: -Churches -Drive-in Retail Businesses -Retail Businesses -Restaurants, Class I -Liquor Stores -Essential Services -Offices & Banks -Car Washes -Service Establishments -Auto Sales, Service & Repair Businesses -Wholesale Businesses -Motels, Hotels, Motor Hotels, -Class II Daycare Facilities' (lots must be 400 sq. ft.per unit) CCINDITIONATUSES -Taverns -Animal Hospitals & Veterinary Clinics -Open Sales Lots -Funeral Homes -Supply Yards -Public Buildings -Motor Fuel Stations -Class II Restaurants -Cultural & Fraternal Institutions -Major& Minor Commercial Recreation -Bed & Breakfast' -Dwellings When Combined With a -Class I Daycare Facilities Permitted Use, But Not on First Floor -Class II Daycare Facilities' Y'ERI11TI"I'ED ACCESSGRYUSES -Private Garages, Off-Street -Parking,Loading Spaces -Decorative Landscape Features -Temporary Construction Buildings -Public Telephone Booths -Other Customarily Appurtenant Uses -Any Incidental Repair or Processing Necessary to Conduct a Permitted Principle Use REOUIRED SETBACKS: -Front Yard: 30 ft.` -Min.Lot Area: 9,000 sq. ft. -Side Yard: 20 ft.' -Min. Lot Width: 60 ft. -Rear Yard: 30 ft. -Height: 2 Stories or 25 ft. -Parking Lot Setback: 15 ft.within Front Yard Setback -Min. Setback from a Side or Rear Residential Zoned Area: 75 ft. PERFORNIANCESPANDARDS:6 -Acceptable Building Materials -Landscaping Requirements -Screening ACCESSORYBUILD NG SETBACKS? -Side: 5 ft.::.........._._. . .. ........... -Rear: 5 ft. -Front: 30 ft. FENCES: 20 ft.Setback for a Garage Entrance Directly on an Alley or Street. FENCES: -Required when across the street or abutting a R District (75% Opaque) -Height: -Setbacks: Within front yard setback:3 ft. On owner's side of property line Within side yard setback abutting a street :3 ft. Abutting a public alley:3 ft from property line On rest of lot: 6'maximum 'When located in home of provider 'Subject to certain conditions 3When not located in home of provider "Other requirements apply schen properties abut Collector Streets,Minor Arterials.Principle and Intermediate Arterials SOther requirements apply Isbell properties abut Collector Streets,Minor Arterials.Principle and Intermediate Arterials 'Subject to certain condition- i ?Cannot be located nearer the side or rear lot lines abutting a street than the principal dwelling or closer than the required setback for the principal dwelling,whichever is less. NOTE: This summary Is not part of the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance,and is only for convenience of reference. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR B-2 DISTRICTS CITY OF SHAKOPEE PE RMrrTED USESL -Retail Businesses -Office & Banks -Theaters -Service Establishments -Medical & Dental Clinics -Physical Culture & Dance Studios -Class I Restaurants -Essential Services -Class H Daycare Facility' CoNDiTIONAL USES& -Taverns -Private Lodges & Clubs -Public Buildings -Motor Fuel Stations -Liquor Stores -Car Washes -Buildings Over 35 ft.in height -Newspaper Publishing & Printing -Motels & Motor Hotels -Essential Utility Service Structures -Commercial Recreational Organizations -Class II Restaurants within a Hotel,Motel -Class I Daycare Facilities or Shopping Mall -Class II Daycare Facilities' -Animal Hospitals & Veterinary Clinics PERMIT`fEI ACCESSORYUSESs -Private Garages, Off-Street -Parking,Loading Spaces • -Public Telephone Booths -Temporary Construction Buildings -Decorative Landscape Features -Other Customarily Appurtenant Uses -Any Incidental Repair or Processing Necessary to Conduct a Permitted Principle Use RE6 RED.S 'BACKS Front Yard30 ft.' -Rear Yard:30 ft. .............. -Side Yard:15 ft. -Height: 35 ft. -Lot Area: 1 acre -Lot Width:100 ft. -Parking Lot Setback: 15 ft.Setback within the -Minimum Setback from Side or Rear Front Yard Setbacks Residential Area:100 Ft. PERFORMANCE STANI ARDV -Acceptable Building Materials -Landscaping Requirements -Screening ACCESSORYBUILDING SETBAOKSs -Side: 5 ft. -Rear:5 ft. -Front: 30 ft (but not closer than the principle building) -A 20 ft.Setback for a Garage Entrance Directly on an Alley or Street FENCES: -Required when across the street or abutting a R District (75% Opaque) -Height: -Setbacks: Within front yard setback: 3 ft. On owner's side of property line Within side yard setback abutting a street :3 ft. Abutting a public alley:3 ft from property line On rest of lot: 6'maximum 'When located in the home of provider 2When not located in home of provider 30ther Requirements Apply when Properties abut Collector Streets.Minor Arterials,Principle and Intermediate Arterials 1Subject to certain coiditioas SCannot be located nearer the side or rear lot lines abutting a street than the principal dwelling or closer than the required setback for the principal dwelling.whichever is less. NOTE: This summary is not part of the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance,and is only for convenience of reference. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR B-3 DISTRICTS CITY OF SHAKOPEE PERM i EDUSESi .... ...... ...... -Retail Businesses -Offices and Banks -Theaters -Service Establishments -Medical & Dental Clinics -Physical Culture & Dance Studios -Class I Restaurants -Essential Services -Liquor Stores -Public Buildings -Taverns -Armories,Exhibition Halls -Hospitals & Clinics -Churches -Dwellings, Combined with a Permitted Use -Class II Daycare Facilities' CONDITIONAL USES: -Commercial Recreation -Wholesale & Assembly Operations -Restaurants Serving Liquor -Bus Terminal & Taxi Stands -Multiple Dwelling Structures -Newspaper Printing & Publishing Shops -Parking Lots -Cultural & Fraternal Institutions -Animal Hospitals & Veterinary Clinics -Bed & Breakfast= -Buildings Over 45 ft.in height -Class I Daycare Facilities -Class H Daycare Facilities' PERI`IITTEUAC `ESSOR3r S4 -Temporary Construction Buildings -Decorative Landscape Features -Private Garages, Off-Street Parking -Repairs or Processing Necessary to Conduct a Permitted Principal Use REOUIRMSETBACKS: -Height: Maximum of 45 ft. -Side &Rear Setback when Abutting a a Residential District: 100 ft. € DI S bI G-S' -Side: 5 ft. -Rear:5 ft. -Front: Same as Principle Building -A 20 ft Setback for a Garage Entrance Directly on an Alley or Street 'ERFOI WANCESSTM fl 1 DS:s -Acceptable Building Materials -Landscaping Requirements -Screening FENCES: ..................... -Height: -Setbacks: Within front yard setback:3 ft. On owner's side of property line Within side yard setback abutting a street :3 ft. Abutting a public alley:3 ft from property line On rest of lot: 6'maximum 1When located in the home of provider '"Subject to certain conditions 3When not located in home of provider Cannot be located nearer the side or rear lot lines abutting a street than the principal dwelling or closer than the required setback for the principal dwelling,whichever is less. SSubject to certain conditions NOTE: This summary is Dot part of the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance,and is only for coareaienct of reference. EXHIBIT A Industrial Summary Tables Old Zoning Ordinance City of Shakopee, Minnesota 1 . Industrial Uses 2. General Requirements Adopted October 25, 1979 Ordinance No. 31 INDUSTRIAL USES X = Permitted I-1 1-2 0 = Conditional Light Industry Heavy Industrial Animal Hospitals and Clinics 0 0 Assembly/Storage of: apparel 0 X food products 0 X glass 0 X leather 0 X pottery 0 X light chemicals X lumber and wood products 0 X paper products 0 X rock and stone products 0 X textiles 0 X tobacco products 0 X fabrication metal oroducts 0 X machinery and aooliances 0 X transportation ecuioment 0 X heavy chemicals X explosives X residential accessory X Bus and Truck Maintenance Garages 0 Commercial Recreation 0 X Commercial Recreation, Minor 0 _ Commercial Recreation. Maior X Concrete and Ready Mix Plants 0 Construction and Special Trade Contractor X X Day Care. Class I 0 X Day Care, Class II X X Essential Services X X Foundry, Forge, Casting, Metal 0 Grain Elevators 0 Heliports, Airport 0 0 Landscaping Services 0 Manufacturing, Fabrication, Processing of: apparel X food products X class X leather X pottery X light chemicals X lumber and wood products X paper products X rock and stone products X textiles X tobacco products X fabrication metal products X machinery and aooliances X transportation equipment X 1 ssa.a 1347 heavy chemicals O explosives O Meat or Fish Packing O Mining and Excavating Industries O O Motor Freight Terminals X Offices X X Paper and Pulp Mills O Public Buildings X X Railroad Operations O X Research Laboratories X X Residential Accessory 0 Restaurants (Class I & II), taverns, private lodges, and clubs and supper clubs, but only when part of a Class A licensed horse racetrack as provided for in MSA 240.01 et seq. X X Retail Sales & Rentals of Recreational Vehicles 0 Retail Sales & Displays with Permitted Use 0 Rock Crushing or Gravel Work O Storage of Coal, Gas, Junk, Salvage, Scrap Metal. Paper and Raas 0 Warehousing and Wholesaling X X Water and Sewage Treatment O (Ord. 31, October 25, 1979) • (The next page is 1380.) 1993 W. 1348 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR I-1 DISTRICTS CITY OF SHAKOPEE -Warehousing & Wholesaling -Offices -Public Buildings -Research Laboratories -Essential Services -Construction & Trade Contractors -Class I & II Restaurants, Taverns, -Class H Daycare Facilities' Supper Clubs,Private Lodges & Clubs' CONDMONATAISESi -Assembly/Storage of certain products:' -Commercial Recreation -Residential Accessory -Heliports, Airports -Railroad Operations -Bus & Truck Maintenance Garages -Landscaping Services -Mining & Excavating Industries -Animal Hospitals & Veterinary Clinics -Buildings Over 45 ft.in height -Storage of Coal, Gas,Junk, -Class I Daycare Facilities Salvage,Scrap Metal, Paper & Rags -Class H Daycare Facilities4 OVIREI3S XCK.Sc -Front Yard: 30 ft. -Rear Yard: 30 ft.(abutting RR-20 ft.) -Side Yard: 15 ft. -Lot Area: Abutting R District: 50 ft. With City Services: 1 acre Abutting RR: 0 ft. Without City Services: 20 acres -Lot Width: 100 ft. -Floor Area Ratio: 1 to 1 -Height: 45 ft. -Parking Lot Setback: 15 ft.within Front Yard Setback -Acceptable Building Materials -Landscaping Requirements -Screening FECES: -Height: -Setbacks: Within front yard setback: 3 ft. On owner's side of property line Within side yard setback abutting a street :3 ft. Abutting a public alley:3 ft from property line On rest of lot: 6' maximum 'When located in home of provider 'When part of a Class A licensed horse racetrack 3Contact City for listing 'When not located in home of presider 5Suhject to certain conditions NOTE: This summary is not part of the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance,and is only for convenience of reference. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR I2 DISTRICTS CITY OF SHAKOPEE 'ERMT>TEU Offices -Warehousing & Wholesaling -Public Buildings -Research Laboratories -Essential Services -Construction & Trade Contractors -Class II Daycare Facilities' -Motor Freight Terminals -Railroad Operations -Commercial Recreation: Major -Class I Daycare Facilities' -Manufacturing,Fabrication, -Class I,II Restaurants, Taverns, -Processing, Assembly/Storage of certain products' Supper Clubs,Private Lodges & Clubs' CONDIT7f?N 4;L US -Paper & Pulp Mills -Meat or Fish Packing -Rock Crushing or Gravel Work -Concrete & Ready Mix Plants -Foundry,Forge, Casting, Metal -Heliports, Airports -Grain Elevators -Water & Sewage Treatment -Mining & Excavating Industries -Rental Sales & Displays' -Commercial Recreation: Minor -Animal Hospitals & Veterinary Clinics -Buildings Over 45 ft. -Heavy Chemical Storage & Mfg. -Mfg.,Processing or Storage of -Class I Daycare Explosive Materials -Class H Daycare' -Retail Sales & Rentals of Recreational Vehicles' REWIRED SE!BACKS: -Front Yard: 30 ft. -Rear Yard: 30 ft. (abutting RR- 20 ft.) -Side Yard: 15 ft. • -Lot Width: 100 ft. Abutting R District: 50 ft. -Min. Lot Area: 1 acre Abutting RR:0 ft. -Floor Area Ratio: 1 to 1 -Height: 45 ft. -Parking Lot Setback: 15 ft.within Front Yard Setback PERFOR% ANCE`STAND:RRDS? -Acceptable Building Materials -Landscaping Requirements -Screening FENCES: -Height: -Setbacks: Within front yard setback: 3 ft. On owner's side of property line Within side yard setback abutting a street :3 ft. Abutting a public alley:3 ft from property line On rest of lot: 6'maximum 1Wheu located in home of provider :When located in home of provider 3Ask City for listing **When part of a Class A licensed horse racetrack 'Subject to certain conditions `When not un home of provider location limitations and conditions 8Subject to certain conditions NOTE: This summary is not part of the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance,and is only for convenience of reference. ti EXHIBIT B Business Summary Tables New Zoning Ordinance City of Shakopee, Minnesota 1 . Business Uses 2. Lot Provisions 3. Setbacks 4. Design Standards Adopted June 7, 1994 Ordinance No. 377 PROPOSED USES COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS X = Permitted 0 = Conditional B_1 B-2 B-3 Animal Hospitals and Veterinary Clinics 0 0 Automobile or Boat Sales, Services and Repairs 0 Bed and Breakfast Inns 0 0 Bus Terminals and Taxi Stands 0 Car Washes 0 Churches 0 Clinics, Medical or Dental X X Day Care Facilities 0 0 0 Developments with more than 1 Principal Structure on Lot 0 0 0 Drive-up/Drive-through Windows 0 0 Dwellings, Multi-family 0 0 Dwellings, when combined with Permitted Use X Financial Institutions X X X Funeral Homes 0 0 Gas Stations/Convenience Stores 0 0 Hospitals 0 0 Hotels X Motels and Hotels X 0 Offices, Administrative, Executive, and Professional X X X Open Sales Lots (with exterior storage) 0 Parking Lots or Structures 0 Private Lodges and Clubs 0 0 Printing or Publishing Facilities 0 Public Buildings X X X Recreation, Commercial (Minor) 0 Recreation, Commercial (Minor, but limited to health and athletic) 0 Recreation, Commercial (Both Major and Minor) 0 Restaurants, Class I X X Restaurants, Class II 0 0 Restaurants/Cafeterias to serve employees on site 0 Retail Business X X Retail Uses Associated with a Permitted Use 0 Storage, Assembly or servicing incidental to perm. use 0 Services Associated with a Permitted Use 0 Structures, Relocated 0 0 0 Structures exceeding height limit (chimneys, towers, etc.) 0 0 0 Taverns 0 0 Theaters 0 0 Utility Services X X X Utility Service Structures 0 0 0 1 LOT PROVISIONS COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS DISTRICT DESCRIPTION MINIMUM LOT AREA WIDTH DEPTH GENERAL BUSINESS B-1 New Commercial 1 Acre 100' None B-1C Existing "Old Shakopee" 8000 sq 60' None Commercial OFFICE BUSINESS B-2 "Office and Related Uses" 1 Acre 100' None CENTRAL BUSINESS B-3 "Downtown Area" 3,000' sq 20' None 2 SETBACKS COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS DISTRICT DESCRIPTION FRONT SIDE YARD REAR GENERAL BUSINESS B-1 New Commercial 30' 20' 30' Old Shakopee Commercial 30' 10' 30' OFFICE BUSINESS B-2 "Office and Related Uses" 30' 20' 30' CENTRAL BUSINESS B-3 "Downtown Area" 1'' 1'' 1. The setbacks for the Central Business B-3 zone are maximum setbacks. 3 DESIGN STANDARDS COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS DISTRICT DESCRIPTION HEIGHT LOT COVERAGE F.A.R. GENERAL BUSINESS B-1 New Highway 35' 75% .50 Old Shakopee Commercial 35' 75% .50 OFFICE BUSINESS B-2 "Office and Related Uses" 55' 75% .50 CENTRAL BUSINESS B-3 "Downtown Area" 45' 100% 4.0 4 EXHIBIT B Industrial Summary Tables New Zoning Ordinance City of Shakopee, Minnesota 1 . Industrial Uses 2. Lot Provisions 3. Setbacks 4. Design Standards Adopted June 7, 1994 Ordinance No. 377 PROPOSED USES INDUSTRIAL AND MAJOR RECREATION ZONING DISTRICTS X = Permitted 0 = Conditional 1-1 II=2 MR Agricultural (Limited to Field Crops) X X Airport and Heliports 0 0 Clubs and Lodges, Private 0 Commercial Vehicle Rental Facilities 0 X Concrete, Asphalt Plants 0 Day Care Facilities 0 0 Development with more than one Principal Structure on the lot 0 0 0 Drive up / Drive through Window 0 Dwellings/Residences for Security Personnel 0 0 Elevators, Grain 0 Health and Athletic Facilities 0 Horse Care Uses (Boarding, Training, Showing, Grooming, Vet. Clinics) 0 Hotels, Motels, and Conference Centers 0 Junk yards 0 Landscaping Services and Contractors 0 X Manufacturing, Fabrication, Processing, & Assembly in Enclosed Building, except those involving those fitting in Mandatory EIS Category 0 X Manufacturing, Fabrication, Processing, Assembly, Storage, Sc. Research, that fits in Mandatory EIS Category 0 Motor Freight Terminals X Offices, Business, Corporate, and Professional 0 Offices within Principal Structure, and Associated with Permitted Use X X Public Buildings X X X Public Recreation X Recreation, Major or Minor 0 Recycling or Composting Facilities 0 Research Laboratories, except those fitting in Mandatory EIS Category X Research Laboratories within Enclosed Building X Restaurants, Class I X Restaurants, Class II 0 Restaurants/Cafeterias to serve employees on site 0 0 Retail Sales of Heavy Industrial Equipment, etc. X Retail Sales of Products Manufactured, etc. on site, etc. 0 0 Retail Uses and Entertainment Facilities 0 Schools, Industrial or Technical Training 0 Self-Storage Facilities 0 Supply Yards, Contractor's X Supplying Goods and Services to Industrial Uses X X {Continued on next page.) 1 PROPOSED USES INDUSTRIAL AND MAJOR RECREATION ZONING DISTRICTS Page 2 X = Permitted O = Conditional I_1 1-2 MR Structures exceeding height limit (chimneys, towers, etc.) 0 0 0 Structures, Relocated 0 Utility Services X X X Utility Service Structures X X 0 Vehicle Repair 0 0 Warehousing and Wholesaling X Warehousing and Wholesaling within Enclosed Building, Except those fitting within a Mandatory EIS Category X 2 LOT PROVISIONS INDUSTRIAL AND MAJOR RECREATION DISTRICTS DISTRICT DESCRIPTION MINIMUM LOT AREA WIDTH DEPTH LIGI-IT INDUSTRIAL I-1 "Light Industry" With City Services: 1 Acre 100' None Without City Services: 20 Acres 600' None HEAVY INDUSTRIAL I-2 "Heavy Industry" 1 Acre 100' None MAJOR RECREATION MR "Major Recreation" 10 Acres 300' None 3 SETBACKS INDUSTRIAL AND MAJOR RECREATION ZONING DISTRICTS DISTRICT DESCRIPTION FRONT SIDE YARD REAR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL I-1 "Light Industry" 30' 15' 30' HEAVY INDUSTRIAL I-2 "Industrial w. Services" 30' 15'2 30'2 MAJOR RECREATION MR "Amusement and Recreation" 50' (or 1/2 ht) 25' (or 1/2 ht) 30(cr IL 1. Light Industrial Zone- minimum side or rear yard adjacent to residential zone- 100 feet. 2. Heavy Industrial Zone- minimum side or rear yard adjacent to residential zone- 100 feet, minimum side or rear yard adjacent from railroad right- of-way - 0 feet. 3. Major Recreational Zone- rear yard adjacent to residential zone-50' (or 1/2 structure's height, whichever is greater). 4 DESIGN STANDARDS INDUSTRIAL AND MAJOR RECREATION ZONING DISTRICTS DISTRICT DESCRIPTION HEIGHT LOT COVERAGE F.A.R. LIGHT INDUSTRIAL I-1 "Light Industry" 45' 75% None HEAVY INDUSTRIAL I-2 "Heavy Industry" 45' 85% None MAJOR RECREATION MR "Amusement/ Recreation" Based upon 80% None Setbacks (PLANCOMMU NZOTABL LSf) 5 EXHIBIT B Residential Summary Tables New Zoning Ordinance City of Shakopee, Minnesota 1 . Residential Uses 2. Lot Provisions 3. Setbacks 4. Design Standards Adopted June 7, 1994 Ordinance No. 377 PROPOSED USES RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS X = Permitted 0 = Conditional AG RR R-1A R-1B R-1C R-2 R-3 Agricultural Uses X X Agricultural Research Facilities 0 Animal Hospitals and Veterinary Clinic 0 Bed and Breakfast Inns 0 0 0 0 Cemeteries 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 Churches and Other Places of Worship 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Day Care Facilities (12 or fewer persons) X X X X X X X Day Care Facilities (13 - 16 persons) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Day Care, Group Family Care (14 or fewer children) X X X X X Developments with > 1 building on lot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dwellings, New Single Family, Detached X X X X X Dwellings, Existing Single Family, Detached X X X X X X X Dwellings, New Single Family, Attached X Dwellings, Existing Single Family, Attached X X X X Dwellings, New Duplex X X X Dwellings, Existing Duplex X X Dwellings, Tri-plex X X Dwellings, Four-plex X X Dwellings, Five-plex 0 X Dwellings, Six-plex 0 X Dwellings, Multiple-family (more than to 6 units) 0 X Forestry and Nursery Uses X X Funeral Homes 0 Home Occupations 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hospitals and Clinics 0 0 0 Kennels 0 Riding Academies X 0 Nursing Homes 0 0 Public Buildings X X X X X X X Public Recreation X X X X X X X Recreation, Commercial (Minor) 0 0 Residential Facilities, Licensed (6 or fewer persons) X X X X X X X Residential Facilities, Licensed (7 - 16 persons) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Retail Sales, Nursery and Garden Supplies 0 Schools (Grades K - 12) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Seasonal Produce Stands X 0 Structures exceeding height limit (water towers, etc) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Structures, Relocated 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Windmills 0 0 0 Utility Services X X X X X X X Essential Utility Service Structures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Density is the number of dwelling units (D.U.) per gross acre. ZONING DISTRICT PROPOSED DENSITY AG 0.00 - 0.025 D.U. / Acre RR 0.00 - 0.10 D.U. / Acre R-1A 0.50 - 2.50 D.U. / Acre R-1B 1.00 - 4.00 D.U. / Acre R-1C 2.00 - 6.00 D.U. / Acre R-2 2.50 - 10.00 D.U. / Acre R-3 6.00 - 18.00 D.U. / Acre 2 LOT PROVISIONS RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS DISTRICT DESCRIPTION MINIMUM LOT AREA WIDTH DEPTH AGRICULTURAL AG Farm / Non-farm 40 acres 1000' 1000' RURAL RESIDENTIAL RR "Rural Residential" 10 acres 150' 200' URBAN, SEWERED, R-1A "Executive Lots" 15,000' sq 80' 160' SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R-1B "Existing R-2" Single Family: 9000' sq 60' 100' Existing Twinhomes: 11,000' sq 70' 100' R-1C "Old Shakopee" Single Family: 6000' sq 50' 100' Existing Twinhomes: 11,000' sq 70' 100' URBAN, R-2 "Medium Density" MULTI-FAMILY Existing Single Family: 9,000' sq 60' 100' RESIDENTIAL Duplex/Twinhomes 11,000' sq 70' 100' Tri-plex: 12,000' sq 100' 100' Four-plex: 16,000' sq 100' 100' Five-plex 20,000' sq 100' 100' Six-plex 24,000' sq 100' 100' R-3 "Multiple Family" Existing Single Family: 9,000' sq 150' 200' Existing Duplex: 11,000' sq 150' 200' Tri-plex: 12,000' sq 150' 200' Four-plex: 16,000' sq 150' 200' Five-plex: 20,000' sq 150' 200' Six-plex: 24,000' sq 150' 200' Greater than six dwellings 1 acre 150' 200' 3 SETBACKS RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS DISTRICT DESCRIPTION FRONT SIDE YARD REAR AGRICULTURAL AG Farm 100' 20' 40' RURAL RESIDENTIAL RR "Rural Residential" 50' 20' 40' URBAN, SEIVERED, R-1A "Executive Lots" 35' 15' 40' SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R-1B "Existing R-2" 30' 10' 30' R-1C "Old Shakopee" 30' or Average 5' and 5'or 30' 3'and 7' URBAN, R-2 "Medium Density" 35' 10' 30' MULTI-FAMILY R-3 "Multiple Family" 50' 15' (or 1/2 ht.) 40' 4 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS DISTRICT DESCRIPTION HEIGHT LOT COVERAGE F.A.R. AGRICULTURAL AG Farm 35' None None RURAL RESIDENTIAL RR "Rural Residential" 35' or None None 2.5 Stories URBAN, SEWERED, R-1A "Executive Lots" 35' or 50% None 2.5 Stories SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R-1B "Existing R-2" 35' or 50% None 2.5 Stories R-1C "Old Shakopee" 35' or 50% None 2.5 Stories URBAN, R-2 "Medium Density" 35' or 60% None MULTI-FAMILY 2.5 Stories RESIDENTIAL R-3 "Multiple Family" 35' or 60% None 2.5 Stories {PLANCO M M.REZOTAB LE.LST) 5 . . . _. . • ' , co ' . •, ., • • . ., ....) , ' ,. . . . . , . . . . • . . • )..04 - . ...1.101•=1•11• ),.....( • Pit:i.).:. . • Z . . &.. - ' • 'I, i f . . • do ; • • ..., fr4 • • .- .,. . . 1 i ! • .....:92. 1......--p.' • , ul ' , 7 --." -1 . - 1 i s ..•00 ..:::// 1 , I ,10 .- • ',-. • I I i ,•,\ , ! i • 1 , . • i ... .. ,' ...I...........08._:..,... .... . i . .....1.. i ,,,. ., , . • I C5 , . . ---.. • ,- '0. i 1 . I 5 ' . I EZ I . •C / '1i- I II § 1 i. ,/, ,, ., . ,, .:. , , , ,, 1 , .. ,,• , _ _. , , , 0.,.• ,.. - .,„( •_,.• _._. _...., _._....._ ... • • . •-. ,. ,. . -.:• .....,......„.....ii, .. , . .. _fil , .. , .._. i , ,.. • i i „' ' ss, -.k.. 4,1 i.1.1.111' ' ' • i i eti I . 11 i , ...... It : '-•'' 1 : rs., .ir :1 i :- k ', •I -... • . ,, . ...• .1 e. i \ I le 't .... .. : ,O. • , . I ' , ,., ' I.-===.., . '•'lit ' • ....- -- - ., I ‘ ..."''* :- .-470•,,; j.. .1' \ ' ' , a. ! . \ . ,.... ...,. „...,..„ ...... .,.„: 1 1 I i ' • I . I 1 I .. .. . ., I 1I I - •.- • ., ..1- • ' --.: .-.• !Mil , .',I • 11 I —71/ =El. I 1 !,.. I r, . - • ; - 1 itA 1 , t .x 0 . , • . • . • -- i :::----- 1-----••• • t71] ----- . . . . . . • . ,. 1 I 3 \ ; I „ T kii.J1 fitIM . 4 -7111111111111M 1 .. - •\. - . . - .......,., I ,4 / ATT[N EL-Ein ;ca" , , a . . ,._. , .44 I i E?Trii . , . . • 1 I.g .4'1111111111111H ; • 0NNIIII011111 4. -,.. II, cci:ild- r....,L..-c,,)T. .• )1 1,, , .t., ...r. ;EF;s7,.,,o,_.•• f „ i . i g A11111111111111... .- .., ill 1 , a a IIIIIIHHHIII ,. , ..•;J-0__1 . 0e,:e ri.;••• . ., No, 'Loll. - - ___ . i ,/ ,m,-...,:•.... 2z-1 I„„: .___....__I__.__111 rr i i 1 • • 1 2 • !111111111111111 ' , yie ll. vil ......... irri,16.411-:-.; . .........,....1 li s-\ ...._ , ,.. _ . . ". ;,.,19,\.o.oi rill /(11.' - • ',Jr: 1 7.- ECM_______1( 11 - - .1 ii ,.. . .. ,....„....,1 =.1 r. el I lit . 62:: 1,:e.:. 1444#111111......n„ ir Ig ! tlillr • • .!....j ......:.CC I 1 , I ' ,a$dli,Lk, - i teIRMI17/ E alum . . i . , , ,,Mz.),, lib-- r„Ex.v,•I iii_ ruillt1itinsy : .. /'',1 • , ! • . 11111- Ili II 1 ; - 1 ' A t'l*". ti I Mr•J Raj ai;iii•Ilr. MIMI -2'.:i •il ita •44.-. .:.-61. titliW/ Elk. tin LIIIIII0w. ' . -•. ..4 mi-m.. ff-A-1 .,_ _ • rtp-.9 i. _ •). . . 1 ,zi... gli . iiiii so- a trite EL,,, ._ =... _ it Tiffin _ L. ''-..:i:,ii:14:41 litlit::.:,.-y. ii.ilie tT, :dna - --- " • , , . 4 ii i i ii --- 13-- _ I I- " -- f -2 El 2 ". i«,is SS I I.. .111 eg; :7ILIZE121 I-I 1 1 1 " .1,-Li_.'_-`.. - ,Aliail.ridi ri..........„, 221 ..:1, 0- I- --- r- .,.. El .0 II .:,..... * • * „ ' .. ., .00 IiI"-.)• .—TA tree. ** . f..s•A mei rIEM: 32. I : -j1-1 7 pm] f•:-.-• 0 Itsqg ••••" .. ;111,1411 , I tre))074 rtz -;._,. 4-_ e 141.• or- z. ., . • . ,......! !!,... ,,.% sm. „Thlis .. tall . ..„11t....e, • , .: I i clitg - 751., Ix- ,-.-, :14 irrCill ' • ...Ir. - i -- 1'V i Era .-- owl%sN• ni ‘ s Pa • .e., 4, MAMsra 1.61I tg, ...to, -*is g'S ig v. • J" - ' LAJ % •I''• ... laS:Alls 4,1",„ it. ....a slog 5 h in • II. • i 1 • ' t Va S.' SI IP-- Los ;AS ss .%IL 5 5111 C •1 A ! a— I . 1 c) ,. ' .. 11;v411: ' ''-.1-4,_\t5),ciA111),;1,511211,1it:-...lictigggi 11111111111h, ell; . 1 . 1 , ...• PA till 116.0 ,.... ...Ail?Ibii„FETpj ItEak. •-1 I : 111411!1 '' 141**,4 r1/4-0.61 9,.% 54 ilV . wcz •at,v, a : . ! •. = , Ills'ildiAltreii EU" ..3'7". Ce4 lkftlro - *. la It '. 1 _ I. ' .: .:. • ., imi A ''° . • • .. It I milliwoil5 • ; I i Il I . 1 k * riA '•71.''. 0-V., ar.1, 33•1? ' .ilivr• • _TIIIIIII .. • ' . , C .11 .40“1. .,,;4...,.re gi V, ii. tliti, litrits •••• ...LA di g g. • . . '. . ' • . "'lr - t . I' '' lifelflip 71: ID it. ail;ti % : A >„, 4 •••111 ,TA\tr: VP* i. , . • r S.= . - 1111111Lliff 1 !it 11 ! • ,, . morn C=1 .. cm, . in4 • \*11 . i l'egi''' 11 L________.......______„=„_-...::. . ., 'w.•- 0."••• WI incioisg •Nis. [-Ty:::,-E]EMfgrir.E.13 r-Iti,(.....,__:.:nl, ' -• At .,..--ts ..- --a-a,\---:- wont. amts. 1/... mrm._Triri -‘•1--avumin Y, • A :„,,,e •:-.-•ig .........=-'\ . • • 01111.1:11LLI P• 1 h . j' A- '3,0 ""1131,r, hr.ig El..Z2--vn - -4 ': :'--1 .- i' • . . .. . . . . -.---- . _ • • . •' • . .*ai 114 4 -.. .11111' 1- (. 111 PLIMITtEd kii•i!...711. `%•1 I' i) ". 1 .11111P 14X •411 Alli MillifThr:g.[Vii.tet•.1 1 '1 .. . • • al remit' 1..,1/4,1, • i '. I i ' • II 11111111 I: • . \ \ 11'\\ ' ,:: "II III:. Aim expiudi [..,,:y;, ti 1, -./ . . . \A' \\\\\\‘ \ .\'‘'.-•., III. 5-ii•'4„.,.,-T'T; ,P,117-13,-.11-'5.6[-. '/.44.-- i,li `?, ,, 1 ,1 . .\ \\.• x, ...., \„:.r.1 kiiittitirmtiniti fr.,:nir-fr,1 la , . i , - -`4- -zt'.---e•',1: Z ,' 1 ",,.. ,rn,•r,I n. R. . *:•:•r:1 r.:.1,-::1 i-t•r: it t.1 . .. . ". ' - r:L1.111.1.0-111117.1.11. iairit. 11,14 1.' if•- ..__.g._'..C_-'' I - ...•4 • 1.1,- .1.• It. r---- i I ,,,,... \ N:•.\ .,. :1111T-riii)r. k 7 I • , . , ., Ai., .\ . . ,. .....; ' .• ' 44 it ,' . ...„ .. i i • ‘\ i.,,,-: • 1 ,,.‘ ) i y,/ ,, cc L., • i •• . . • . - A\ ,,__ 4. ,N,:•, ,-, /tot ; / _ • . *%\•\ - --c-.. -•5.....-... ._,../.... - ._-11littalklidi ‘ _, ..tictim.,1 i , . . \'•:..\ - • . . _ILI:ill . . . \\ 1 ... . .._.,::_.... "1:-r—, • • .0;.. i , , _ . . . ... ,..... ......, ,, .. . ,••i ,, , • . _ .'k..\`',\\ .12 ,••:.• . _ • . . . . . ..t. . . • . . • .. _ , I • • ' •, 4411111•111111111011~1114•11.11.11111111101, allISIMINIMIIIIMMEWOMOMMINIMMM -• ••..,• . • \ \ .\..,\..___.....;:...... ..".•N . • •• .. . • t • ----1 --;...„. .4.,\ , ( • • -• - -_-") E--.;-----_7 \,..- ., .,_ . • - _r - _ • . ' 1 . ;‘ 1 '1)-C\< 1 f 5 • ^. ..5 i • r I ' , 4," , • . --........,,,-- J,---•-'-'- /-----'tf --- -••-•11t - -Y-.- 1:- ' I . •( :4- ' \... 4 1 4 . t, ' ' , •',: .' . ,11 i .1%). ... S. ,p .' Zs 3 r''--r— A, 111111411444'-141111111 0: :f:x..11 .s ir• ..., ":..........t.C:1-0 j ,...---:....----- --.....-.......=••-- 12..1L.R. Imme I,-'••••.,.) /f 3 1 1 • 42 BS! 184! t ---,. s. •-tz..-.7m7_- ---- . • 14 ii rt. 111 !ill 1 • . . , .• ; , , ..,. , • i_ i . , wa% 0 1_,........i...._. 1 __., ; 4-_-_.. , IN i las IL"'li • i . 7 liliummevii ) 1 ( 1 --- -------1 Imr , e ... w. , IIIIIIIII El i4 . ,, ,,, , t• , 1 iii ---)7l\\ • . , , liiii .. 2 S c,, __:_,_.._. - ___.\ ......4........, ......_..)........_ „, i .. I . \%\ 111iiilli c. c ) ii , , _ : _ . __1 tt, ()) I U141 . N V(7 1111 111 i 1 \* oIIIIIIlit. ... • , li - . I111 • 2 . ti14" 44 ri agia ea et a 1113' \•. , r,7...V. ... ,--- . , dot \s— i ,, ., , „ , ix a vilet 61 I \. i • 1 1 i i . 1 I _ sabilli ' • I ' ' fq ii....7 I c H i I '14 ft s oras0021 us 4 (/ , . - ), -, . P . . '71- f . 4)1'.....4.4110.01111111‘.–st-lt t ' •.-- - •4 - ilell ii IMI,kik 15.34 1h6.11111 . • r-'•- "----,. 1 .4. ii ' , 0,5 -.....: 'ir 17! 12 111, or ...ii wok, a soiv, , 0001111111 SO. I • ;'I, ; . .. 0010!•of siont,aim" I ...I ; • zi 141Filips 1 . , , l Mil r: owl Am *i I,ilk sr 1 • At , „T.. • I. • ,, ' P ilns am. Po rs 'A'13 or.silo's,.14 sgi 1 All 1 ...._,..411-ligroi sow ‘ i -.lin+.0.mon• Ailiiis II ),‘ ' in it: . . i 0, 0 __ __,. /1 , •:- ../' i , , .. 0 , , 1 Illimidllifill 14.11111111113 \.v. i ; , . 01P.ii 11- . (r) ) • r,---" k 44.1 I! ', ,MEIN OR \ _5-- likilii4 rill , er 1 i ‘ , ,, ..41._.,.., , , i. ... , , , x .. , ir...........:Ii....z.., ) r •$\* —...-_ lf- - • I° r I ‘ . 0 . — .-•:-... IN t 1 It ) • 7/ r p , ) 7. , , 111 ', ,,i 1 •._ ; . -1 ' •, 1 WI .,,, , , ,, , „ , ,_______,_ rn I .• .. ,s, - , -•.- , iji,_ Rol% ,,k.' 1 • , \- (fr.-.!: • d , - ,,.<4, 1 . . Aiiii%rj, .... ......... 1 ‘!' .'"•-".., 1,; ../..;•) . - VTA I I,1.1)t*.. i f' - g , '• . , — it•I _ .k ' " Yiir 1, - -iv__ ;•-•!.. P.' , L L_LI I ML ' f 1 r MN t 1 r • / -..-. -I r• - -I i.....ir,,- Irly,41 / •,:ii,:. , , / ' 1- , , 1 1 i • „,, 1;,, •„,.:1 !, •• ' ,,, i if&t . 114 ----- , ...: , — er 1 ---1--- — —7171'• ,. . 4.,. , 1 , A .,...... iv ,. ... .• \ i i t , • i 1 ss • i 1 t 5. [rm iatiEgizeli; , , 7:. / ._I I f i 1 p Al . . 0 / - 1 . . i ii it . . i . iii d _ / o -•-±-- _ , f-----1----- --- - / / I 1 ........ / t, r I ri.- tit . . , i Alm / I . • g i q L••••,..•MOO \ ......-....1..........71. ............ ,„ il 044; ,%. 1 I 0, i ift W ill, 1 \ ..< • N 00 I lie,•,', , A fv,,,, , ( i T. , • ..... . ,., , , i ir , ---..— ii, At . ,„,!.sic , , -11 ' , , , , , , t ... • -r- - -,I .1.- - --I'm I NMI ........... .i Li):: - .. ^‘• i IL , ,.. . 1 0 "N'It]ti ' • ••, , ,e - , 41 ""P'.• , 1 • il if . 1,-'11 :. •.•fr,'.--,: NI . ,*- -„,-4, ):....!'el Altkih, !------'...."----' r•-- / . b• . ••• Pith% •-[,,,, 1. iii 1 / gb ' ivi li, 4.,,,orp 111' I 411 , 14"1.1 _ / raiN ' 1 Et Mai IK. la MI j= 1 hi ilf i I l , 144 i! ''''''' r • ........._ I t, pi 11 i , \ qt iiiigl _ 7: AT I NI1 r ( ..,,, , a,i ,....1 4 . ,1 \ • \NMI. - - 1 . P '• / I ., ., , , 1 " . ; kt : re/ '' • - • •:".1 of . / 41 .— : ,"' 1 . i, ,400.444. 4 0 = w. ==.111 I ‘.. , i1 1. : , , , -,f r..„.. /7) eiti'''''''', .' )1 ,' ,' , 011114011111111 arriii, 14- 4,... , CO i V 01 Pila / -,,,.4 1 • ' r; AI I *-.• 1 ' 1 I I AV=' ( ., • i I l\s It :$#.4N / , I i dire' 11611g,•• "fel ' I 10 / 1,1 03 • I i 1 • I / ...-...... -... - .. .... - W • )M{ 1~ •• -1 vlvsslww W ® 33dONVHS 40 AJ.I3 uooMYo7 7NKSAu: 3001YYa ,� I C "0.' .-/'-? \c1."" ........7.re • 1111111 �. • ' ° (,`y�'" li wawa= 1 ( I ._ utt ...............4I)/_1L! wvsnonstris Is Yw31ls ��" / l 1. . _ _ • , • 1 li• �� ' ' veld win Wel 0661 lana uo(lt7odwe� ;�; ! �7 / 1 .. . JSP -- a a - • 1 j um I \� _ ■ttt■ ttrtiltttlt ................... i„......._____ \ a , ov .--.) II • -r -- - kill .... . ;--; c;„..•.,..,r, 1 ALAI.. 1•••••-. rOilk- °a \ • _ `` �r 'Ll•, �U1.. 11 1�• NMI t h11. + • �rr� , ‘ 'it\irp.' .1,2'ril 44.4.4 w. •) . ?,...f, . ---..-;1. . . . ..,,.., ,_ kir e,__.....104..1.00.1;014,3 --ierk.\\.` - : I\....'il A4 d-- i - . • . : i.,...i...1 - 1 . +ma r \q„,-4.----". 1/4../''' \jr-------- • • • • 01 dew • • �A..S1.Y. iid0)Ib'HS �o AIlO mitt! d ....".11.- __ ill" - 331.4 Y3a7,res:! 1 MIN �'� /e NI..1-.2.1 1 bW11r1/Jr+w �� _ e/ 11(3.,4, f!!ll/plftllitJiiitllltfl 31111/151/17i:1•r.! a I t MI b11/07,$31 41IMI'1:.^.1 31 'r•r s I3.�sia• - • ---_-1/1:%171$31 Aa1SY37 d:3+ .Y - . - I� .. .. I • 1rUN371S3Y A1111N rn N .a Ir'■ -rr DY+11r 1 d + .�- ueld een PUeI 0661 elteum01 uot�eloavuel1 _J-- ... a —`q_ • tIr ;Id cc:_l_Fr. .� G1................*_. r - 1"- _.'�. - -�L n ''r '1q1-fin I �. I1 bd. - r4 Od �' ),�r-----/ ": Lit. ; C..: 1 r r I� QR "F . ff m ate fi :P. � a . ` _"... ' tOr* $ 1-.:.,.',, %� 11. I Od E 11 !, I I 1 . v „km a zi •......,0-3 ks. w - ���-.... .,,T iy"a; y1.,9-is is III rA, .�-�!/. 1 . -d - ,uvuc • co Its' 1111111:1111- -if r- t, „L......1 ,.fes 1. i --IliV•1..! "'"'" ---1-4. *liiii-",pit-.14,_' ...r...,,,ar*---‘ ailliffidgararigiallrill..,-, . .-7-41111111111111111r-i • •••••••\'‘ 11111? *ilia 0 117' loisitileei"&"61,... / I d (,/ ` -1 •• ... • . j ' • • •,••••••"•••••• • / \ • ,,/•‘) - • \ , '• p \ , 1 ,0 i- - , /-i ./ p \ .• -...-1.-k....1;;I'''' '•• i /,_._........._,..............,4,- u„.......1, •I Nti 11 •' _.. '' . OS ' •-•• ••-/.--•=. .... .. „ ••-••••---`... \I OS N k N OS ...)1, •.?•,'",. ' . sm. , .-\If- * _.........--1......:--------_.. ...........1 ...• •1 \I ......... • • 1 li •../. -z,----..-.....-.-:.---)4,......--- . 1.S.Is% .........7-•-•-•...... ...... • , • • ....., ....• .... ' I _.,...... .. ..'e o. k_'• ....r,,.--,-- :_=•rf. c ...._.,/,, .., ,v--- '''N., ...) -,e'"°.7•• *..., 'T Prieft : r„ --=--....-ii ..........-4...........\(\ .) . ..,......7•7... •I /''..-1-*.N., s•••7•7•''..Hirla --1,'''') ',. '''?-irie •••L'-•••----='•----.7-7'' • % c ir-.7-ir , , ......, . , , .I i -.... 4., _ ...... ..... .........__:,,c,,,.. ...... „ ,, , . ,,.. . , , os • .-.......--...___, ,,, ,,. ...,,)6,--5 :•-7'73L'....3` ion' II ....• .••••• 3. , \ _-- - - . I • .. . • -/•-: . •••• ..... ••,1,.. A r -......u.- •••.,•-• 7. -A • 7 . 5_377' ' c -.1 ceD3..:••°•14 -1„,,t-2,'"9,0-----.--. c 3Uu_)I ' ' . -: • ./...------a-,-.:--,-----7-7 --",--11.::,‘•-•;s-,\(:''.\•:--:-----ter7,-„,--rk,• ..ff,„ rrt-,, ...;•••••=1"=M7:17. 0 Z=M7•7:::.•••••e0••••••• =7•••==r0.4==r•MM%MOMO= 1 i.41 C 1 I . 1 4C er .7.77......' ' ,... .' r"-:-.7-71 1-,.A••r• . ...1.$4.1;:7'...: :.tirit,,'.."4..-....,k 1 .11__th .-J ,J , 1 • .. -.) 1. 1 • '• .„1.y.r. 0....• .. ., ,1:-.: •,-, ..,Irp Hi, ( rir •:.1 -.. - • %. • •,t lisTrturaikAt.t •..A,'.I "...Z.:sit. ' I o f D • 1 I .f t-,- ---eli RT ••••••••. 7• 4 sotioesia_„....) •' '''' ‘' 1 4 110u1440" J---1 -`4••.,' .I I. .." , °fn.? 7 .o „:„,•-• , s'. . •.,c c 1 non ,..........., II , ,I z--:-_:---riL jj-:----- rsi-11, .••• .. ....... ..-----'-f,..•\;,...,.. ,-.\•,-:.zkz iii '''....., .1(14'.- r-;,JL it, [ II , . , •.,,,,,„ • ,eir,..,m,-1,,..--,---Ar.:- , ,,•••• t----0,,-.,,,',...',!'"'...kt7';,.'.1;::, ,.---,7•••••F-1., tt,:-.:\‘`'.•-• Li;lir,;1-•'`,,. -,.. LisDn'l s.1( l---1.) II 4i/..,/ ,/ /4 P 3‘.....1‘MDR %I • •• '-,I'\V.:,'.' Kam*• -"V.,,,,y1',/.'1'.,,:',..'•'........-::,...'-,.•[ ii • „/• li.,.,1, ..: .. . r,.. • ii . . . . . . ... • , / / , ,, 1r-- i .... - .-; ,. ,• •ii.--.2-• k -II ' 1 . . I ...'' II ...,...i ... /r-------lk____24,.......),: ,,., ,.-..:,;,••.,.'. ...„•,• ;,,-,..,•-..•i,,,..:.,, ,...,..,, ..., ....1 ro.,;•:.13;1i...,,i,•• 1,.,• II 1 chlum_NIt\c.viLHDR* ,,..........),...•..,F,....c i /1,:c// ____,,, _.....,4! RT • --• ...... • .......... r / s / 'SFR,'t il pH ....:.; id' 0 4 " * 'Thi ' '' " dr3L-JL., IL . , . L_T---..=.-.•-•-%-..1, , ' . ••••/ I 4./..,....----„ii • ' . . 11.wovAlg., it' 41 •‘,• .. i, 1.!...•• .1 I.`41 fi if•-.411.0.1',01 i if !• 1-7.--1E,T ,c-....-7-1 ., . ... ,: N"......-4_, il ;•:•' HC 111 /4'1.711DR .'t 7 UL JL'l'LI' ' . ' • Ii 'Ll:.. .1111.1'.21J.' 0.1,11_,J. ' ES_JUIL.1-63J-Hon." : :. t*t. II j , i /4.,,,,,,.,.. ,...,_-_,...„,„..,-4- ,....-...- ..... ...2".1!..r.M...-.L..... .-... -... .A.... __t•-•-•-• '..\••%1 - RT ...„../ I I / y, -.--)rj[ 1-1 -1r--.77)pr-7---1r-7-7,7, • - •! r-‘k , 1 . I. SFR • '• . !***24."•••••,.......4%.4.4.,.. III ( I ES ' I 11 ' 1:, 'II" - • II I "S I Id 111. 1 ' 1 ., I •1 `v '; !, !: ', ( .;t't s`....;;4( ))/ • fit' • • .,' '`I .1 . ...,..._ I -II 111,.: . II c..1, Iimas4 '•, •' I . '• ' ' "=--tr'''""''% ''; • r mon I 1 .---i m .' • - -11 c II „. ) , I. :..1 411 '''t sr- --IL ,, ... . .Ts.?•m, + .. I SFR AM if-1-111 :'• ‘‘.4.41 \•:,•,.......,...... I / li ,..,. .• . .- . II rr..• Id,•••S I ; Oil !, E' ' . • . 1.0 I / ( C it\iii . ' ,'fr'"• ill , !J: . • --,r)--- ...., . ..... 1... gni ti • %---1 . I //1 , It p r.- • :•• ELI o-r------j Mall III P I . I.,• '•". I l& rri ' \ if I '" • ' • - ' F I ll -,-" ..........-=_-.. ---.., =.)) - • . .sna , • Lc i • V ' \ f HI ",• - ill --' 11 •"/ s't---. '-'-",,t11.. MDR MI lr • J , •••\._ // ' 1 / • ( MDR Ili •'. ., i • . . ' iil -I-1 .....•••••....•••• irl''''':•••‘.....,./.....0 I.) ......z.t....0. •JIL , ......• ............,_,...... ....„, ........i . l',...i , • • i L.,....,..._1_J 11 I /5/ 11 ' . i II \ JL........... ") C ......1'---".-------ir•-••••....11-_,,•=,=•,-1101- ......••••••••-"- \ 1 r----y ,i t---Nr• I Ctrr--'1 I I . C il -......... • ..... c .1 *-------'-'-'"'--li(--- sFF,. 0 ! v,-o . . . 1 sr AO ....is ra. j(......----- • •-• ' \ I \ .., I SFR II P l'i 1 II,I ' MDR I •••••••••• I k. I" am ( JL----- s 7 . gross I 1.0•0' I 111 ..... ,. .......- lam ....,JL___4 .... ....---___J l_----- - 1 L---- - • . . . . • • . 0 .. 1,i• . . • . _. . , • . Land Use Plan For Year 2010 -. • -.1 • CsnD Single-Family Residential Cg Commercial CO School Cap ChUrch Shakopee EA.D Mid-Density Residential E8D Central Business District CO Park Comprehensive Plan _; • CorD High-Density Residential 03 industrial C€) Public City of Shakopee.Minnesota 1989 , CHcp Heavy Commercial cip Race Track-Related C°s3 Open Space 1:1-,-111tWf1F-L_J • - (D• • •... .. ... • DI 16.4 • -- ------- . • 1 ' . f_. • . - • . • _ • '.-.. .... . _ . ••_. .• -..„,..,. . _ . .. • ,,•-••••\,. --!...; . . r , I. •: ' /.. s\ \ , ..... %., . ___,,/.% •4 i „•••• , ••• ,, ,;••-°- ‘.. ••• 'III,'... ''z' ' cm's; .....:,‘- • - r • \- ,... , ....,-,, 1 . ,..•„:-.. ,. ....... . 1- •- ,,,. ,..,„:.,..1.,./... c.,,,..,...,..:11...,....7 : :,...........:,-.\:, .\ \ ) . .. .' ,, ',V-yr:;\ ' ' ' N \ e ' ..... !.-. 1r7•17-nr N j• , 1' .c.e..% +.,. TV ,..--4.....==....n r ,•t41414::::.••-•...,,d,cT--, os 1 ..., \ 'I .1 j • -.4 :.,- ,...........,,..__k_ -- , i'd , • t s, • •• . ' ' ""•,....:,.1: 11A ....1 1- . I Pe • , ,. . ,.. , wi.....,..("•.... ,• ,,,..„....,... . ,,, -..."....„.110 1,. ,„.... ---%__ _/‘•••• ,. i • . . , ' , ',,',,a.,',.-11 IA ,-.*,•••%.„... ,. 1.0 "=.v...1•.•••••!,,,„,..) II -ler...,3„j,... ---t-7-•-ir..,N. „•:•••4°- ',' , .' ,.. • •,. • , .til. A. . .14 * ''.. 't•;1•,...... I il 1111 i t rtir4 - 1 . , f RT I •••- -4 i .• )" I It...FC . t.,'s • ' I • , jrf-------1(c -•--I 1 •.. -J r ..:••.• .., , •,,•• 1 ii. :, ' f•: ,". I 1 , ' 1., IL ltf.1 117 'ichbti,t,i.,•;<7.-....,,.. ,.: / ,.. t.___ ,,_______, , \ ,. \-0, •.,t..... I .,-• , , __IL, m.. '>. -• ' '"I . - - ' . ''. '''' •••'-i'''. .....''''. ' 4' [;/r77- 1 SP ittl. 1 i ••.. • ,, I 1 ............r............... .......4. ...... _ , ., • • ..•• \W.Cr.1 ...,4,....,....... i ==4....."...'-7- c--_*.r-c . • 4... =, •• I., r- '•- \ , '' •s:•.'1 is...in ,! , , ,- - -, , •_, 'i .. I . . .••• •..‘. ._..,_,, ,c 1 BP e 1 L.....is ' ' . ......--‘f r 1 ,j \.•,,,..,,\ A il---j -• "" - ' • .1 . -ricH-1C-----.1.1-3 •R...) ••• _Jip r..,.. .....,),,..17, 1 ,r-nral l --- ,-- lisER_Jird cli_10.il_ SFR /(°Ir 'sZi QIP j '7' .%.s 1 meaner my nein r--- • ,I t r __ .--__._r"...." Now,. ..,, „,,...j ..........,, %%I....4._ \\ 1 "...•....,2....._ ..,..-.*N.,.......----.=-...-.... \\ • Irr..-ir,-„-v- I, g.1 vi l4,41 ‘L•=b II 1 ...;..,-,.....„ RR ••••••:::,......0S.s•••••'••••.:...-=ora .11 in • . ••••••••,;...,„ •••••• •••••..--,.........,__ ,,,,. . .WA 1, I. ............_ ,I ,1 • 1, :.`-•I L_____I,..L........ 'FR II\-rxe- 1,1 I .......-z.„........_ _ Th lr---,...---0.:_' ..___ •I • I I - 11 1.. ." 1 I '•., II __ L_. JI •A .. nn . ... ..,,,, . , .,.«,Ili:is • r ji,A.2 ,-.._,-trA ....,.. .. i \\,.... • • • i\A II .z.:11 .„...., . n. ,.. 1 i orr7, yr' • • , II . ii,...„...„.._._.. ,,. 1 1 nit r_.,....„...).1L.....:;,,,......L._i_.,.......1 • •)1 •4 I t...k I I I \ , , ,.:. , • ;' p_5---s ..\ 1 • . , • . it.... . . I so.am et .' ' .,:.', p , ' .i 'f.' . i ...• .1::::.•).1 :I i ( s ; • t- . / ..:. ' : 1", Ispips.-• 1 " 1 . i• ; r • ' ,,I ) ,,....., •i j,,. • 3, Si • • .l'. I I-. I....,..• . '41 . • • , ' I/ I %* • • ..,., OS 1 • ;•,• RR 1"..7**11), Ril ,„ i,', „ i ,kl.) ,..., • X.\ OS) 'I . 0-""- I"'"1 r I ..:k*: - -- . ,???..) ...... v2 • , .. .,. 1 . ., , I 1 , , ,, • t1 , '• •-...,.1,,, .. N • jt -ii • :..---- I -= -irik,,. ... ) , I RR li • ,. • ' ' • •' . '.i• ti-1-,, ..... - ri'_Nv 1 • 1 tli . . , . . 1. r-.- fri - , ___I riC\-.\-2&"11/4.clsca.R.a .. I‘.... •-• .;.,;..x. ....:.....: -• ., i. • I • % - - F-4-' .• , .., • . . , • • Land Use Plan For Year 2010 )-( , .. trIJ '--• . • • Shak . opee . i •• CO Agricultural GD High-Density Residential CO Industrial )1°13 ,Gun Rural Residential CO Commercial Eip Race Track-Related Comprehensive Plan 1..4 ..._.., ,_ • LvD Single-Family Residential CH ) Heavy Commercial CO Park City of Shakopee.Minnesota 1989 •-41 , GD Mid-Density Residential CD Business Park OD Open Space . 171-,BRIV ri.r--1 (D 1 ', Wellooknoldielsks • •••no• Ow • V' u a a) giCt aT b M 'v • � a a M Zr�1N 0 to M '0 W ++ N .L: W r-1 o 1-1A o Oi a an u B I .-4 14 0 U 1.1 U b ' H CO 1a d N N Z o• O 0 []pa /4 '' N .a e (1 to a 4-1 M 4-1 "nn :V q • w a x O a + • 2�� o �, cd 14 u mo ..-i •.i „ al O N b N - D, 0 a m o '.sd • h ° rno• .a u 0 oCa O � 01 cr)aO ..1G O n D'O o = 14 'x3 w w `� 0 Mti z ox 1 .c ci ,-1 xf () w 3 14 0 0 pp PW a! �` w b . 'v • 0 , pa 0 a)O 0 1.4 a Hu � 0a D, N ..G 0 • U >, a G 14 N O '0 al al a c 3 •.-1 4.1 d al 0 N O 'd ,..) CO a � r1O m M ,-1 .a a) 0) a 41 a) a ~ • 4cn A 3 n 3 a ) a • 1 -4 s II II / . 1 AL, 1 .1 ii . ,II .- . . li • lig 1 it / 11 ca aadsvr u / ,,,, ,,,,40, 4k, di ,! il 1 1 . 1 . - iti' 4 • ' ,, . . . • . � ' 11 I 1t,,a*74:4144.1 r►'"1 II 14)1!1 ..k, *111111111.111 �� / /AIW -wr ©n - IV10l WIN 1112111g a �I I /•.. ,:. 0 i , .. ♦ 4tit5 „ ,,,,tii i i ! , = ► II , . :°441ittl l'ffl, -- II, / 'I 11 A '' A1.44"VLV .A°41 v /o nietioti . use Ai �© � iglir t + m latil , -♦ II 2-42 1 . r rr / li . vi, i'4 ix . - ` 11IiiQ� Aitj L,' 11 l'_g'4IUU `11 - e �`D mi. 1331S.94114A �,IA 7/ - ., • N •• -I i ~ a�� /, �a I) -v:lii4 II ��s ,IIT �� C� _—� _ '� I ' 'I 1S fl leins00 i i iAA1_*tat 1 11 wine I — 11114116/mapiAmiAim' N - el1k1l0 W �, Ill MI m4;1' • - —_ I -. -I” TI T - -�•> I ,• 1 TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Tax Impact 1994/94 Informational DATE: November 8, 1994 Staff has obtained the proposed tax rate from the Scott County Auditor. The city rate is 26.522 . The actual rate for pay 1994 taxes is 27. 104 . For a residential parcel with a current estimated market value of $89, 000 this means; Increase over last year $25.27 9.9% Increase over two years $15.28 5.7 2 .9% per year Increase over six years $34. 10 13.8% 2 . 3% per year Decrease in tax rate from last year 2 . 1% Attached are sample properties that have been tracked for years as part of the budget process. Shakopee Assessed Value and Taxes Payable Assessed Value Formulas Residential Properties - Homestead 1987/88 1st 68,000 a 17.00% excess a 28.00% Tax Capacity Formulas Residential Properties 1989/90 1st 68,000 a 1.00% 68-100K a 2.00% excess a 3.00% 1990/91 1st 68,000 a 1.00% 68-100K a 2.00% excess a 3.00% 1991/92 1st 72,000 a 1.00% 72-115K a 2.00% excess a 2.50% 1992/93 1st 72,000 a 1.00% excess a 2.00% 1993/94 1st 72,000 a 1.00% excess a 2.00% 1994/95 1st 72,000 a 1.00% excess a 2.00% Assessed Value Formulas Commercial Properties 1987/88 1st 60,000 a 28.00% excess a 43.00% Tax Capacity Formulas Commercial Properties 1989/90 1st 100,000 a 3.30% excess a 5.06% 1990/91 1st 100,000 a 3.20% excess a 4.95% 1991/92 1st 100,000 a 3.10% excess a 4.75% 1992/93 1st 100,000 a 3.00% excess a 4.70% 1993/94 1st 100,000 a 3.00% excess a 4.60% 1994/95 1st 100,000 a 3.00% excess a 4.60% See examples on following pages. Shakopee Assessed Value and Taxes Payable Residential Tax EMV Tax Cap. City City Total Total Parcel Year Value Value Tax Rate Tax Tax Rate Tax 27-004147-0 1988/89 63,400 1,376 15.008% 206.51 124.721% 1,716.16 1989/90 66,600 666 16.929% 112.75 101.304% 674.68 1990/91 68,900 698 23.426% 163.51 119.996% 837.57 1991/92 68,900 689 23.979% 165.22 135.370% 932.70 1992/93 72,000 720 28.162% 202.77 140.007% 1,008.05 1993/94 72,000 720 27.104% 195.15 146.446% 1,054.41 1994/95 77,000 820 26.522% 217.48 27-037013-0 1988/89 74,800 1,646 15.008% 247.03 124.721% 2,052.91 1989/90 79,100 1,062 16.929% 179.79 101.304% 1,075.85 1990/91 79,100 902 23.426% 211.30 119.996% 1,082.36 1991/92 79,100 862 23.979% 206.70 135.370% 1,166.89 1992/93 83,200 944 28.162% 265.85 140.007% 1,321.67 1993/94 83,200 944 27.104% 255.86 146.446% 1,382.45 1994/95 89,000 1,060 26.522% 281.13 27-033005-0 1988/89 85,800 1,921 15.008% 288.30 124.721% 2,395.89 1989/90 90,100 1,122 16.929% 189.94 101.304% 1,136.63 1990/91 90,400 1,128 23.426% 264.25 119.996% 1,353.55 1991/92 90,500 1,090 23.979% 261.37 135.370% 1,475.53 1992/93 92,200 1,124 28.162% 316.54 140.007% 1,573.68 1993/94 92,200 1,124 27.104% 304.65 146.446% 1,646.05 1994/95 98,700 1,254 26.522% 332.59 27-015004-0 1988/89 112,700 2,695 15.008% 404.47 124.721% 3,361.23 1989/90 118,600 1,878 16.929% 317.93 101.304% 1,902.49 1990/91 120,200 1,826 23.426% 427.76 119.996% 2,191.13 1991/92 120,200 1,710 23.979% 410.04 135.370% 2,314.83 1992/93 126,900 1,818 28.162% 511.99 140.007% 2,545.33 1993/94 126,900 1,818 27.104% 492.75 146.446% 2,662.39 1994/95 135,800 1,996 26.522% 529.38 27-015006-0 1988/89 129,400 3,246 15.008% 487.16 124.721% 4,048.44 1989/90 135,800 2,394 16.929% 405.28 101.304% 2,425.22 1990/91 136,900 2,327 23.426% 545.12 119.996% 2,792.31 1991/92 136,900 2,128 23.979% 510.27 135.370% 2,880.67 1992/93 153,800 2,356 28.162% 663.50 140.007% 3,298.56 1993/94 153,800 2,356 27.104% 638.57 146.446% 3,450.27 1994/95 164,600 2,572 26.522% 682.15 Commercial Tax EMV Tax Cap. City City Total Total Parcel Year Value Value Tax Rate Tax Tax Rate Tax 27-001162-0 1988/89 46,200 1,525 15.008% 228.87 124.721% 1,902.00 1989/90 47,400 1,564 16.929% 264.77 101.304% 1,584.39 1990/91 53,500 1,712 23.426% 401.05 119.996% 2,054.33 1991/92 52,100 1,615 23.979% 387.26 135.370% 2,186.23 1992/93 52,100 1,563 28.162% 440.17 140.007% 2,188.31 1993/94 54,000 1,620 27.104% 439.08 146.446% 2,372.43 1994/95 59,400 1,782 26.522% 472.62 27-001205-0 1988/89 256,400 11,511 15.008% 1,727.57 124.721% 14,356.63 1989/90 265,400 11,669 16.929% 1,975.45 101.304% 11,821.16 1990/91 302,700 13,234 23.426% 3,100.20 119.996% 15,880.27 1991/92 291,900 12,215 23.979% 2,929.03 135.370% 16,535.45 1992/93 288,100 11,841 28.162% 3,334.66 140.007% 16,578.23 1993/94 307,800 12,558 27.104% 3,403.72 146.446% 18,390.69 1994/95 223,000 8,658 26.522% 2,296.27 27-087008-0 1988/89 270,500 12,251 15.008% 1,838.63 124.721% 15,279.57 1989/90 281,100 12,464 16.929% 2,110.03 101.304% 12,626.53 1990/91 295,900 12,897 23.426% 3,021.25 119.996% 15,475.88 1991/92 284,300 11,854 23.979% 2,842.47 135.370% 16,046.76 1992/93 332,000 13,904 28.162% 3,915.64 140.007% 19,466.57 Income 1993/94 342,800 14,168 27.104% 3,840.09 146.446% 20,748.47 1994/95 377,000 15,742 26.522% 4,175.09 27-105001-0 1988/89 1,123,800 57,050 15.008% 8,562.06 124.721% 71,153.33 1989/90 837,400 40,612 16.929% 6,875.21 101.304% 41,141.58 1990/91 837,400 39,701 23.426% 9,300.36 119.996% 47,639.61 1991/92 837,400 38,126 23.979% 9,142.23 135.370% 51,611.17 1992/93 837,400 37,658 28.162% 10,605.25 140.007% 52,723.84 1993/94 848,800 37,445 27.104% 10,149.09 146.446% 54,836.70 1994/95 933,600 41,346 26.522% 10,965.68 27-054001-0 1988/89 5,467,900 285,115 15.008% 42,790.06 124.721% 355,598.28 1989/90 4,500,000 278,579 16.929% 47,160.64 101.304% 282,211.67 1990/91 4,501,700 221,084 23.426% 51,791.14 119.996% 265,291.96 1991/92 4,517,700 212,941 23.979% 51,061.12 135.370% 288,258.23 1992/93 4,532,400 211,323 28.162% 59,512.78 140.007% 295,866.99 1993/94 4,575,200 208,859 27.104% 56,609.14 146.446% 305,865.65 1994/95 4,575,200 208,859 26.522% 55,393.64