Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/04/2000 TENTATIVE AGENDA CITY OF SHAKOPEE REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 4, 2000 LOCATION: 129 Holmes Street South Mayor Jon Brekke presiding 1] Roll Call at 7:00 p.m. 2] Pledge of Allegiance 3] Approval of Agenda 4] Mayor's Report 5] Approval of Consent Business- (All items noted by an * are anticipated to be routine. After a discussion by the Mayor, there will be an opportunity for members of the City Council to remove items from the consent agenda for individual discussion. Those items removed will be considered in their normal sequence on the agenda. Those items remaining on the consent agenda will otherwise not be individually discussed and will be enacted in one motion.) 6] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS - (Limited to five minutes per person/subject. Longer presentations must be scheduled through the City Clerk. As this meeting is cablecast, speakers must approach the microphone at the podium for the benefit of viewers and other attendees.) *7] Approval of Minutes of Sept. 7, Adj. Regular Session and October 5, Regular Session, 1999 *8] Approve Bills in the Amount of$751,356.00 9] Public Hearings: 10] Communications: 11] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 12] Recess for an Economic Development Authority meeting 13] Re-convene 14] Recommendations from Boards and Commissions: TENTATIVE AGENDA January 4, 1999 Page -2- 15] General Business A] Parks and Recreation *1. Facilities Manager Resignation B] Community Development *1. Continental 95 Fund Sign Variance for Kmart Store—Res. No. 5301 2. Amcon Construction(Precision Collision) Conditional Use Permit for a Vehicle Repair Facility—Res. No. 5302 3. Cost of Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for Proposed Valley Green Corporate Center 4. Comments on EAW for Q Prime Site for Proposed Ampitheater C] Public Works and Engineering 1. Street Lighting on Sarazin Street for Shakopee Valley Marketplace 2. Traffic Control Signage Along 5th Avenue and Lewis Street D] Police and Fire 1. Deputy Police Chief Performance Pay E] General Administration: *1. Designation of Official Newspaper 2. Assistant Finance Director Appointment—memo on table 3. Appointment of Acting Mayor for 2000 4. Canterbury Card Club 16] Other Business 17] Adjourn to Tuesday, January 18, 2000 TENTATIVE AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Annual Meeting Tuesday January 4,2000 1. Roll Call at 7:00 p.m. 2. Approval of the agenda 3. Approval of October 5 & 19, 1999 Minutes 4. Approval of Bills-None 5. Election of Officers 6. Other Business 7. Adjourn to Tuesday January 18,2000 edagenda.doc OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION OCTOBER 5, 1999 Members Present: Brekke,DuBois, Sweeney,Link, and President Amundson Members Absent: None Staff Present: Mark McNeill, City Administrator and Paul Snook,Economic • Development Coordinator Others Present: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk and Tim Thomson, City Attorney L Roll Call President Amundson called the meeting to order at 10:29 p.m. Roll was taken as noted above. IL Anoroval of Agenda DuBois/Link moved to approve the agenda as presented. Motion carried unanimously. IIL Consent Business None IV. Minutes None V. Financial None VL Other Business None. VII. Adjournment DuBois/Link moved to adjourn to October 19, 1999. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. itott;tit j • ati., J dith S. Cox, E.D.A. Secretary Esther TenEyck Recording Secretary :.. OFFICIAL:PROCEEDINGS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA. ADJOURNED REGULAR SESSION October 19, 1999 Members Present Brekke,DuBois, Sweeney,Link, and President Amundson Members Absent: None Staff Present: Mark McNeill, City Administrator and Paul Snook,Economic Development Coordinator Others Present: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk;Jim Thomson, City Attorney; and Gregg Voxland,Finance Director. L Roll Call President Amundson called the meeting to order at 10:17 p.m. Roll was taken as noted above. IL Annroval of Agenda Sweeney/DuBois moved to approve the agenda as presented. Motion carried unanimously. IIL Consent Business Brekke/Link moved to approve the Consent Business. Motion carried unanimously. W. Minutes Brekke/Link moved to approve the minutes of September 7, and September 21, 1999. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Financial Brekke/Link moved to approve bills in the amount of$115.38 for the EDA General Fund. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). V. TIF Documentation and Analysis Gregg Voxland stated that the State Auditor will come to Shakopee at some point to audit in great detail the TIF plans/budgets/activity. In preparation of this, he suggested: 1) the establishment of separate TIF files to consolidate the documentation for each TIF district, using existing budgeted funds in the Finance budget; 2)retention of the City's auditors to analyze, document and tie the files to the Annual Report, TIF reports and TIF budgets; and 3)retain a financial advisory firm with TIF expertise to analyze this and TIF plans and developer's agreements for legal compliance, do a cash flow analysis and make recommendations for corrective action. Sweeney/DuBois moved to authorize staff to proceed with a full tax increment financing review with funding from Tax Increment. Motion carried unanimously. Official Proceedings of the - - : . -October 19, 1999 Shakopee Economic Development Authority Page 2 VI. Resolution No. 99-2 Establishing the Economic Development Advisory Committee Sweeney/DuBois offered Resolution No. 99-2,A Resolution Establishing the Economic Development Advisory Committee, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. VII. Adjournment DuBois/Link moved to adjourn to November 3, 1999. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned,at 10:25 p.m.. ,ff4A/Vi. j . 0/26 dith S. Cox, E.D.A. Secretary Esther TenEyck Recording Secretary .. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: EDA FROM: Mark McNeill, Executive Director SUBJECT: 2000 Officers DATE: December 27, 1999 INTRODUCTION: The EDA is asked to elect officers for 2000. BACKGROUND: As January 4th will be the annual meeting for 2000, a slate of officers should be elected for the EDA. Appointments by election may be done by motion. By-laws of the Economic Development Authority require that the terms of office for President, Vice President, and the Treasurer expire on the date of the annual meeting of the Board of the subsequent year. The offices of the Secretary and Assistant Treasurer do not expire unless specific action is taken by the Board. The Secretary's position is filled by Judy Cox; the Assistant Treasurer is by Gregg Voxland. Therefore, the President, Vice President, and Treasurer positions should be elected at the January 4th meeting. Mayor Brekke has asked that Deb Amundson serve as President of the EDA for 2000, and makes that recommendation to the Board. Nominations for Vice President and Treasurer should be made at the meeting. ACTION REQUIRED: The EDA should,by motion, elect officers for the positions of President, Vice President, and Treasurer of the Shakopee Economic Development Authority, for the year 2000. Mark McNeill Executive Director MM:tw OPPICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ. REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 7, 1999 Mayor Brekke called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. with Councilmembers Deb Amundson, Jane DuBois, Cletus Link and Bob Sweeney present. Those absent: None. Also present were Mark McNeill, City Administrator; R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director; Paul Snook, Economic Development Director; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; Gregg Voxland, Finance Director; Greg Sticha, Accountant; Dan Hughes, Chief of Police; Mark McQuillan, Park and Recreation Director; and Larry Meilleur, member of the Planning Commission. The Council entered the Work Session regarding discussion of the 2000 budget. Paul Snook approached the podium to discuss the EDA budget. Mr. Snook noted that Vision Shakopee undertook the process of envisioning downtown Shakopee. Mr. Snook noted that a record of accomplishments and successes of Vision Shakopee were available. He also noted that Vision Shakopee is about four years ahead of the usual timeline for similar organizations. Mr. Snook noted that Southwest Suburban Publishing was interested in moving to the downtown area. He suggested that the Council not look at Vision Shakopee as an expense but as an investment because the City has the opportunity to protect tax revenue and preserve capital investment in the downtown area. John Perry, 14540 Lakeview Circle, Shakopee, MN, approached the podium. Mr. Perry stated that he was concerned after attending the last budget planning meeting that there was not a working public/private partnership. Mr. Perry stated that he did not think that either Vision Shakopee or the Council was looking to the other for direction and better communication is needed between both parties. Mr. Perry stated he would like to see the City support Vision Shakopee. Mayor Brekke asked what the highest priority of Vision Shakopee is and Mr. Perry replied that while the organization would like to see some things now, its major goal is looking at the future to keep the momentum going. Paul Snook stated that there were three items the EDA was looking for support on which items were as follows: The Downtown 18 Avenue and Riverfront Master Plan; Market Analysis for the same area and the Vision Shakopee Operating Budget. Mr. Snook noted that a strategic planning meeting was held last spring to develop a consensus of direction. He stated that the three items will need to be implemented either now or in the future. Mr. Snook listed the reasons the City should be involved in the requested budget items which reasons included the City having a stake in the development area. Mr. Snook stated that having a successful revitalization program required a public/private partnership. Mr. Snook requested that the City fund $15,000 or 26% of the Vision Shakopee $57,000 operating budget with the rest of the funding to Official Proceedings of the September 7, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 2 come from the private sector. He noted that the organization would like a program manager to oversee the daily operations and be a communications link between the City and Vision Shakopee. Mr. Snook stated that without a full-time program manager, sustainable revitalization would not occur. Regarding the Downtown let Avenue Riverfront Master Plan, Mr. Snook estimated the cost to be $150,000 which included rendering and implementation plans. Mr. Snook requested the City pay $75,000 and the rest of the needed funds would come from the private sector. He noted that the City should be involved in the Downtown 18t Avenue Riverfront Master Plan for a number of reasons: to guide implementation for the district; to reposition the downtown area to compete in the metro retail services market; to overcome physical impediments and to provide a positive image. Regarding the downtown market analysis, Mr. Snook noted the cost to be $50,000 of which the City was being asked to fund half with the other half coming from the private sector. Mr. Snook noted that one of the reasons for the City to be involved in the market analysis was to invest in the City. Mr. Snook also stated that without a market analysis, the property would not be able to develop market strategies since physical improvements alone would not enhance the area. Mr. Snook noted that a market based comprehensive approach is needed. Mr. Snook also noted that market analysis and master plans are 100% funded by most cities. Mayor Brekke proposed funding $15,000 for a Vision Shakopee office, however, providing no funding for the other two items. Mayor Brekke stated that more discussion was needed regarding the other two items and should be revisited at an EDA meeting. Deb Amundson voiced her concern that there were no funds for any other potential economic development opportunities. Bob Sweeney stated that the City was already supporting the EDA in the amount of $100,000 which seemed adequate. Mr. Sweeney did not think the voters would be comfortable with funding positions not responsible to reporting to the City Council. Jane DuBois stated she was confused about the funding in that it appeared the EDA was asking to fund a concept. Ms. DuBois stated that the downtown area needed to be more viable. Cletus Link stated that Huber Park should be a project of Vision Shakopee and the EDA and Council should work together and redevelop the 15t Avenue and Spencer Street area. Paul Snook stated that a Master Plan has existed for Huber Park since 1995 but there is no implementation for financing. Cletus Link questioned whether the Master Plan could be revised and Mr. Snook stated that he would look into the matter. Jane DuBois stated a market analysis is important because the property cannot be marketed without one. Bob Sweeney noted that a market analysis was performed for the Blocks 3 and 4 development, however, a large portion of the cost was funded by TIF surplus which was now a thing of the past. Mr. Sweeney stated that funding Official Proceedings of the September 7, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 3 a market analysis could not be done without a referendum and he did not think a referendum would pass. Regarding the EDA Operating Budget, the Council was in agreement with the exception of Bob Sweeney. Gregg Voxland was directed to set up the same tax levy as last year and split it 50/50 between the HRA and EDA. Bob Sweeney suggested if there is a surplus, that nothing should be levied for the HRA and EDA. Mayor Brekke stated that he thought the City should levy for what it is spending because it makes it more difficult for next year. Mr. Sweeney stated that it was wise to not levy because when defending the budget, he would like to be able to say that the City looked at all possible reductions. Gregg Voxland gave an overall picture of the tax levy. Mr. Voxland noted that a lower priced home of $81,000 was now valued at $85,000 or an increase of 4.7% compared with a home valued at $117,000 which was now $122,000 or an increase of 2.1%. Mark McNeill discussed Murphy's Landing and stated that a committee had met and discussed the matter. Mr. McNeill noted that there were three suggestions which came out of the committee which do not impact the City's levy and encourage participation from other sources. Those recommendations were a one-time contribution of $30,000 to cover the shortfall in the present year's budget; sponsoring a full-time position to perform grant writing or take some or all of the long-term debt. Regarding the one-time contribution, Mr. McNeill stated that the City would have to make sure that the contribution would meet the public purpose test and the city attorney could research that question. Bob Sweeney stated that he would support the one-time $30,000 contribution taken out of the budget surplus which would not impact general levy. Mr. McNeill noted that plans are being reviewed for a possible renovation. Regarding the Transit Budget, Bob Sweeney noted that if the City does not levy, the Met Council will. Mr. Sweeney stated the if the Met Council levies, the debt will come out of the Shakopee taxpayer's pocket. Gregg Voxland noted that that may not be the case. Michael Leek confirmed that if the City opts not to levy for transit, then the Met Council will levy. He stated that the City opted to levy local transit tax for 2000 and it was not an option for the Met Council to levy the difference between the maximum levy and what the City chose to levy for transit. Mr. Leek stated that either the City or Met Council levies for transit and it cannot be a combination of the two entities. Bob Sweeney questioned whether the same level of service was available in this proposed budget and Mr. Leek replied that there was, however, there was a possibility of expanding the express service. Mr. Sweeney suggested looking into the concept of a transit hub. Mr. Leek stated that the Official Proceedings of the September 7, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 4 professional services budget could be looked at to research the question of when a hub would be appropriate. Regarding the Recreation Budget, Gregg Voxland noted there were increased programs. Mr. Voxland also noted that a transfer of $70,000 from the General Fund would result in a deficit. Bob Sweeney stated that the City would have to make up the $70,000 transfer in another area. Regarding the Police Budget, Chief Dan Hughes approached the podium. Chief Hughes thanked the City and Police Department. He stated that the 2000 Budget included requests for two school resource positions which were grant positions, the continuation of two community service officers which were also grant positions and a half-time staff support person. Chief Hughes also noted an increase in supplies and services due to rental for vehicles and equipment in addition to training. He further noted the need for two additional civil defense sirens, a trailer for tactical gear, a K9 squad and one marked police car. Mayor Brekke noted that he had no problem with the budget. Regarding the goals of the Police Department, Mayor Brekke stated that the first goal should name a percentage, the second and third goals should be more specific and a fourth goal of crime statistics be included. Bob Sweeney stated that he had a problem with an 11-12% increase in each of the last two years. Mr. Sweeney noted that the City cannot continue to fund 11% increases in coming years. Mr. Sweeney stated that if the budget proceeds, the City has to remember that grant positions end and then the City has the expense without any grant. Jane DuBois noted her concern over the increase and did not know whether the City could afford the K9 unit this year. Mayor Brekke stated that he remained an advocate for school resource officers which accounted for a large portion of the increase. Mr. Sweeney stated that Chief Hughes needed to recognize that there was not an endless amount of money. Chief Hughes stated that in the next couple of years, he did not anticipate an increase for sworn officers, but if the City continues to grow, more services will be needed. Cletus Link questioned if the population was increasing by 10%, then the City should have more funds coming in, however, Mr. Sweeney stated that increasing population does not necessarily mean more funds are available. Deb Amundson stated that future needs of the Police Department may include radio/computer technology. Chief Hughes confirmed that if the school resource officer grant is received, the officer would be assigned later in the school year. Regarding the Five-Year Equipment List, Mark McNeill noted that Chief Mary Athmann told Mr. McNeill that $5,000 should be sufficient to make repairs to the 1974 Mack fire engine to last a couple of years more. Bob Sweeney suggested increasing the Fire Department repair budget as the repairs may come to more than $5,000. Official Proceedings of the September 7, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 5 Regarding the General Fund Revenue Forecast, there were no disagreements regarding the revenue amounts. Regarding the General Fund Budget Expenditures, there were no disagreements regarding the expenditures. Gregg Voxland stated that the December 31, 1998, General Fund Fund Balance was below our target range. One item for Council consideration is the transfer of money from the General Fund to the Capital Fund to cover the deficits for the improvements to Sarazin Street in the amount of approximately $400,000. Mr. Sweeney questioned if Sarazin Street is designated a Municipal State Aid Street and if there is a shortage of funds, can you use Municipal State Aid Funds to make up the shortage. Mr. Loney responded that the City always spends Municipal State Aid Funds on Municipal State Aid streets. Usually we run short of funds and have to supplement a project with Capital Improvement Funds. Mr. Sweeney asked if we could adjust the timing for improvements to other Municipal State Aid projects so that Municipal State Aid Funds for 2000 could go for the shortfall for Sarazin Street as opposed to making it up from general levy? Mayor Brekke directed that research be done on Mr. Sweeney's suggestion and report back to Council. Mr. Voxland asked if Council wanted to use any of the $1,500,000 above the target General Fund Fund Balance to write down the tax levy or transfer it to the Building Fund. Mr. Sweeney suggested transferring the bulk of it to the Building Fund. There was consensus to transfer the funds above the 25% target to the Building Fund minus $400,000 which shall remain until funding for the Sarazin Street shortfall is identified. Mayor Brekke adjourned the meeting at 6:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, 4 Cli dith S. Co ity Clerk :221(.: Janet Vogel Freeman Recording Secretary - I OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 5, 1999 Mayor Brekke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with Councilmembers Sweeney, Amundson, and Link present. Councilmember DuBois arrived at 7:22 p.m. Also present: Mark McNeill, City Administrator; Bruce Loney, Public Works Director/City Engineer; R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director; Gregg Voxland, Finance Director; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; Paul Snook, Economic Development Authority Coordinator; and Jim Thomson, City Attorney. The pledge of allegiance was recited. The following items were added to the agenda: 15:B.2. Fire Inspector Job Requirements; and 15.E.14. Discussion of Health Insurance Premiums for City Employees. The following item was deleted from the agenda: 15.D.2. ISTS Ordinance. Link/Amundson moved to approve the agenda as modified. Motion carried unanimously. PP g Mayor Brekke gave the Mayor's Report and stated that he was pleased to report that Police Chief, Dan Hughes will be remaining with the Shakopee Police Department. The following items were removed from the Consent Agenda: 15.D.1. Amending Preliminary Plat Resolution for Pheasant Run (Barricades) - Res. No. 5242; and 15.C.2. Change Orders for Joe Schleper Baseball Stadium. Sweeney/Amundson moved to approve the Consent Agenda as modified. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Brekke asked if there were any citizens present in the audience who wished to address any item not on the agenda. Drew Stoffer, Shakopee Boy Scout Troop 218, approached the podium and presented letters concerning their Citizenship in the . Community merit badge. He then explained the requirements of the Citizenship badge. Sweeney/Amundson moved to approve the Minutes of June 15, 1999 and June 29, 1999. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Sweeney/Amundson moved to approve Bills in the amount of $228,907.11. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Mayor Brekke opened the public hearing on the proposed vacation of an easement located within the plat of Shakopee Valley Marketplace. Official Proceedings of the October 5, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 2 Michael Leek explained that upon review, at closing for this property, it was discovered that a blanket easement was granted to Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative in the 1940's. It was transferred to the City for the Shakopee Public Utility Commission's use in 1998. SPUC has indicated that it would be appropriate to vacate the blanket easement because easements needed are in the plat of Shakopee Valley Marketplace. The Planning Commission reviewed the vacation in September and unanimously voted 6-0 to vacate the easement. Mayor Brekke asked if there was anyone present in the audience who wished to address the Council on this item. There was no response. Mayor Brekke closed the public hearing. Sweeney/Link offered Resolution No. 5240, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee Vacating a Blanket Easement on Properties in the Shakopee Valley Marketplace Plat, City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Cncl. Sweeney reported that the Scott County Board considered an Economic Development proposal, which would require each governmental unit to have a plan that meets the requirements set forth in the statute, prior to backing any economic incentive to businesses. Cncl. Sweeney reported that there was an item on the Public Utility agenda relative to a lease between US West and the Public Utility Commission for a parcel on the pump house site at 10th and Spencer. The Public Utility Commission Director, Mr. VanHout, was directed to identify properties owned by SPUC as well as report on the pros and cons of their ownership of the properties. Cncl. DuBois entered and took her seat at 7:22 p.m. Bruce Loney reported that after City Council received a petition on June 2, 1999, from residents along T.H. 169, who live in the Hauer's 4th Addition area, David Brauslau Associates, Inc. was hired to conduct a Noise Assessment Study in the area to determine the noise reductions from various alternatives of berms and walls and the costs and benefits associated with these items. David Brauslau approached the podium and explained that because the housing development was constructed before the highway, there was no noise barrier design assumed for this area. He said he looked at the sound levels for the first row of homes on the north side of Vierling Drive closest to the highway and not shielded, as being the most impacted by the highway. Mr. Brauslau explained that noise levels were taken at the critical hours from 6:00-7:00 a.m. in August, which is considered nighttime as defined by the Pollution Control Agency. The critical daytime hours are 7:00-10:00 p.m. Mr. Brauslau noted that the traffic levels between Official Proceedings of the October 5, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 3 6:00-7:00 a.m. were not much different from the traffic in the p.m. When monitored, he said the traffic levels were very similar, only about 1 dba lower. The daytime hours had an L10 (dba) of 65, which means the level is exceeded 10% or six minutes of the hour. The L50 level for daytime hours was 60, which means the level is exceeded 50% or 30 minutes of the hour. The nighttime hours had an L10 of 55 and an L50 of 50. Mr. Brauslau explained that sound levels were predicted using the STAMINA 2.0 model developed by the Federal Highway Administration and adapted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Comparisons between the predicted and monitored sound levels show a relatively constant difference of approximately 4 dba. This is attributed to the tieing of the concrete pavement, which increases the noise from vehicles, especially trucks. Based on this, he used a 4 dba adjustment. Mr.Brauslau explained that the sound levels at the homes north of Vierling Drive are below the (L10) level of 70 dba identified by the City of Shakopee as requiring mitigation. However, nighttime levels during the critical 6:00-7:00 a.m. hour under the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Standards are exceeded by approximately 10 dba. The daytime levels are at or below the standards using the L10 descriptor and only 1 dba above the standards using the 150 descriptor. He said that the construction of a barrier 20 feet high at the edge of the slope north of TH 169 would not be sufficient to reduce the nighttime levels below the standards. However, a barrier 15 feet high would provide approximately 5 dba reduction in the peak hour sound level but would cost three times the amount deemed reasonable by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Therefore, construction of a noise barrier is not recommended. Mr. Brauslau recommended treating the pavement and encouraged development in this area, which would shield the homes at no cost to the city. Bill Christian, 2800 Jade Circle, approached the podium and stated that he has conducted his own noise study and agrees with Mr. Brauslau's results. He said the problem is what should have been done. He said he felt that Mn/DOT could have anticipated higher speeds, heavy traffic, and the possibility of homes built along highway 169. He suggested a compromise of 5 dba for commercial and 5 dba for residential. Bruce Loney explained that the Hauer's 4th Addition was platted in 1987 and did not abut the T.H. 169 right-of-way. An indirect source permit was applied for in April, 1990 by Mn/DOT and approval was received. He also stated that due to the Minnegasco line, a combination of earth berm and a wall would be necessary on the undeveloped property to make a difference. Sweeney/DuBois moved to receive the Noise Assessment Report for Vierling Drive and Jasper Road by David Brauslau Associates, Inc., dated September 22, 1999. Official Proceedings of the October 5, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 4 Sharon Ernst approached the podium stated that any housing development would require noise abatement measures, and asked for clarification relating to the lack of a requirement for noise abatement when the development was constructed. Bruce Loney explained that the development occurred before the highway was developed, therefore there was no requirement for noise abatement. Motion carried unanimously. DuBois/Amundson moved to direct staff to meet with the property owner to advise him of noise issues and the petition. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Amundson moved to terminate Todd Schumacher's probationary status. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Sweeney/Amundson moved to authorize staff to advertise for bids, as per specifications for an asphalt patching box, and approve the purchase of a cab & chassis from North Star International Trucks, Inc. for the purchase price of $37,775.55 utilizing the State Bid. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Sweeney/Amundson offered Resolution No. 5241, A Resolution Accepting Work on the River District Trunk Sewer Reconstruction Project No. 1999-1, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Sweeney/Amundson offered Resolution No. 5237, A Resolution Declaring the Cost to be Assessed and Ordering the Preparation of Proposed Assessments for 17th Avenue, From Sarazin Street To 1/2 Mile East of Sarazin Street and for the Extension of Sanitary Sewer, From Trunk Sewer SS-H Westerly; for the Extension of Watermain, From French Trace 1st Addition To 17th Avenue and Sarazin Street; and for a Trunk Storm Sewer From 17th Avenue To Mn/DOT Linear Pond Project No. 1998-5, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Sweeney/Amundson moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the transmission easement, No. 99-55, and release of Pipe line easements as prepared by Reliant Energy Minnegasco and subject to the City Attorney's approval. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Bruce Loney reported that Enebak Construction Company is requesting a suspension of the noise restrictions on the hours of operation on Saturdays to begin at 7:00 A.M. instead of 9:00 A.M. He recommended that if the suspension of hours is granted, that approval be subject to complaints received by residents. Official Proceedings of the October 5, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 5 Sweeney/Link moved to approve suspension of City Code Sec. 10.60, Noise Elimination and Noise Prevention, Subd. 3, Hourly Restrictions on Certain Operations, D, as requested by Enebak Construction Company, the contractor performing work on Valley Green Corporate Center, to work from 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on Saturdays, as per their letter dated September 30, 1999 and direct staff to publish notice of the suspension terms with the conditions as recommended by staff: 1. minimizing noise exposure near residential areas, 2. if excessive residential complaints are received by the City, the suspension can be revoked at the discretion of the Public Works Director, 3. blasting activities, if any, must be done from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. A discussion regarding tree preservation was held. Michael Leek explained that the Shore Land Ordinance prohibits intensive vegetation alteration within the shore impact zone. The language also allows judicious trimming and some cutting within a 75 foot zone back from the ordinary high water mark for Dean Lake. He said that current Woodland Preservation provisions are City Code. Motion carried unanimously. DuBois/Brekke moved to direct staff to come back with something addressing tree preservation or protection or replacement on commercial sites. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Amundson moved to declare approximately 50 bicycles as surplus property and authorize the City Administrator to sell or otherwise dispose of these items. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Regarding the Fire Inspector position, Mark McNeill explained that Scott County questioned whether the requirement to become a fire fighter would create problems in terms of establishing residency. He said State law says that cities may not require residency for their employees; however, the by-laws of the Shakopee Fire Department require that a fire fighter live within five miles of a fire station (and within the Shakopee fire protection district), and be within seven minutes of their place of employment for daytime calls. He said the City Attorney has determined that there is no legal impediment to the job requirement; the requirement that the fire inspector become a member of the Shakopee Fire Department within six months may remain. However, it will likely reduce the number of qualified candidates interested in the job. In addition, as a City employee who is also a firefighter, the Fair Labor Standards Act would require that time and one half pay for fighting fires beyond the normal 40 hours per week be made. He said it appears that a blended rate between what they make as a firefighter and a fire inspector would be an option, and would be the base for the time and a half. (This is yet to be determined) Official Proceedings of the October 5, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 6 Mark McNeill said the job description is written so that a candidate must become a member of the fire department within six months, or be a retired member of a Fire Department. An additional specification may be that the candidate shall have 10 years of fire fighting experience with any fire department. Fire Chief, Marvin Athmann approached the podium and stated that it was a mutual desire for both the Council and the Fire Department to have the Fire Inspector belong to the fire department. He said he was not aware of any of the surrounding cities that do not have this position, and did not feel this would reduce the number of candidates. Regarding the requirement that a candidate belong to the fire department within six months, Cncl. Sweeney stated he would move to strike the Fire Inspector position from the budget. He said this requirement would result in a situation in which the only candidates that will apply for the position would be local, presently or immediately retired from the Fire Department. He suggested that there might be a qualified candidate that is not in this group. Mark McNeill stated that someone willing to be a member of the Shakopee Fire Department would be a bonus and it would not be a minimum requirement. Sweeney/Amundson moved that the job description for the Fire Inspector be amended affirming the requirement for fire fighter status, experienced firefighter, and/or retired firefighter status while employed as a Fire Inspector; however, if less than three qualified candidates are generated from the advertisement, that this requirement be dropped. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/DuBois moved to direct staff to advertise the Fire Inspector position. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Amundson moved to terminate Michael Liesenfeld's probationary status and place Mr. Liesenfeld on full-time status with the City of Shakopee in the Park and Recreation Department. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Regarding the Change Order for Joe Schleper Baseball Stadium, Cncl. Link stated he would be against the 7% contingency fee of $33,418.00 because he feels enough money has been put into this project for the year. He also said there is no bidding process for change orders and questioned how one would know if the price were inflated. Mark McNeill explained that the request to add contingency was intended to make this similar to the engineer's contracts. He said he did not want to have a situation where council approval would be required before proceeding with something if time is critical. Sweeney/Amundson moved to approve the Change Order for minor changes to utilities for the Joe Schleper Baseball Stadium Project, ($16,920 minus a credit of $5,132 = $11,788) from Park Reserve Funds. Motion carried unanimously. Official Proceedings of the October 5, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 7 Regarding TIF and Park Reserve Funds and change orders for the stadium project, Cncl. Sweeney expressed concern that the CIP is viewed as a potential pool of funds to go beyond what was originally approved. Regarding the Amended Preliminary Plat Resolution for Pheasant Run, Michael Leek explained that the original resolution called for the construction of a temporary cul-de-sac precluding access to Valley View Road. He said Resolution No. 5242 deletes Condition No. 7, which relates to the temporary cul-de-sac. Dawn Kahnke, 2224 Valley View Road, approached the podium and stated concerns for safety at the intersection of Valley View Road and Marschall Road, and the lack of speed limit signs and traffic flow. Jean Marshall, 600 Hennes Avenue, approached the podium and stated that as a contractor for school buses, safety is their concern. She said the police department has requested that they not use the 17th Avenue intersection. She said Valley View Road is a public road and they must service this. She stated efficiency issues and economics in transporting students. She questioned the traffic problems on CR 17 and asked whether letting some of the traffic go east on Valley View Road wouldn't eliminate some of the safety issues on CR 17 by avoiding some of the traffic. As a citizen, she said this is a public road and she should have access. DuBos/Link offered Resolution No. 5242, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending Resolution No. 4907 Approving the Preliminary Plat of Pheasant Run, and moved its adoption; allowing barricades to be opened on Pheasant Run Street. Motion carried unanimously. A recess was taken at 8:55 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:06 p.m. Regarding the Bach Appeal of Board of Adjustments and Appeals denial of request for variance to front yard setback, Michael Leek explained that Paul and Ann Back `made application to allow a front yard setback of 26 feet instead of the required 30 feet for their property. The request was for an expansion to their dining area. The Board of Appeals reviewed the request, determined that the criteria was not met, and denied the requested variance on a vote of 5-0 with one abstension. Ann Bach, 1034 11th Avenue East, approached the podium and stated that it is too expensive to expand the garage. She said that as a day care provider, sitting down for meals is important and her kitchen is not large enough to do this, with seven day care children. She discussed other alternatives but due to a set of steps they would not work out. Official Proceedings of the October 5, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 8 DuBois/Link moved to uphold the Bach's appeal, and direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the requested variance for the consent agenda, for a 4-foot front yard setback variance at 1034 11th Avenue East. Regarding the motion to uphold the Bach's appeal, a discussion was held. Cncl. Sweeney stated that the structure of the variance requirement requires the denial of the variance. Mayor Brekke stated that this is a question of reasonableness, and added that overturning the Board's decisions is an on-going issue that the Council needs to address. Motion carried 4-1 with Cncl. Amundson opposed. Michael Leek reported that Joy Dressen has requested a waiver of the minor subdivision criteria. Her parents own two homes, joined by a breeze-way and she would like to purchase the front home from them. The property is currently considered as one legal description. Cncl. Sweeney stated that this property has a number of meets and bounds descriptions. He explained there have been a number of meets and bounds descriptions in his time on the Council, which had problems arising from those meets and bounds descriptions. There was discussion regarding an alley and access to the rear home. Joy Dressen approached the podium and stated that an alley exits from 3rd to 4th street. Michael Leek stated that the survey shows proposed legal descriptions for what would be parcel A and parcel B if the property were divided. The City Attorney stated that this is not a problem from a legal description viewpoint. Cncl. DuBois stated that there maybe financing limitations in the future for the home in the rear that would only have 13 feet abutting right-of-way. Link/Sweeney moved to approve the request of Joy Dressen to waive subdivision criteria for Lot 3, Block 5, East Shakopee Addition. Motion failed 4-1 with Cncl. Link in favor. Sweeney/Amundson moved to accept, with regret, the resignation of Shelly Bilotta from the position of Community Development secretary. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Sweeney/Amundson moved to approve the job description for the position of Community Development Secretary as outlined in the October 5, 1999 memo from the Community Development Director. (Doc. # CC-274) (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Sweeney/Amundson moved to authorize the appropriate City staff to post the Community Development Secretary position externally, if there are no internal candidates. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Official Proceedings of the October 5, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 9 Sweeney/Amundson moved to approve a donation of$30,000 to Minnesota Valley Restoration Project, Inc. d/b/a/ Murphy's Landing, with the understanding that this is a one time only contribution. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Sweeney/Amundson moved to direct staff to prepare a budget amendment for these monies to come from the City Council line item. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Sweeney/Amundson moved to approve the application and grant a Sunday on sale intoxicating liquor license to Pablo's Mexican Restaurant, Inc., 230 South Lewis Street, effective October 6, 1999. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Sweeney/Amundson moved to approve the application and grant a tobacco license to Speedway Superamerica L.L.C., 1195 Canterbury Road, effective October 6, 1999. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Sweeney/Amundson moved to authorize the release of the letter of credit for Longmeadow in the amount of$45,000 and the return of the escrow funds for Brittany Village in the amount of $18,750, plus interest as outlined in the Developer's Agreement, for the construction of Sarazin Street. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Sweeney/Amundson offered Resolution No. 5238, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee 1) Agreeing to Act as Fiscal Agent for Murphy's Landing for Grant Request, and 2) Agreeing to Provide a Portion of the Local Grant Match A Federal Transportation Enhancement Act (TEA- 21), and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Sweeney/Amundson moved to set a hearing for Tuesday, October 21, 1999, at 7:30 p.m., or thereafter, to review the action of the tobacco licensees: Tom Thumb #250, 590 S. Marschall Road, Canterbury Park Concessions, Inc., 1100 Canterbury Road, Budget Liquor, 6268 Highway 101, Koehnen's Amoco, 804 East 1st Avenue. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Sweeney/Amundson moved to set a hearing for Wednesday, November 3, 1999, at 7:30 p.m., or thereafter, to review the action of the alcohol licensees: Crossroads Liquor of Shakopee LLC, 1262 Vierling Drive East, Canterbury Park Concessions Inc., 1100 Canterbury Road, Magnum Management Corp. dba Valleyfair, One Valleyfair Drive, Turtles Bar and Grill, Inc. 132 East 1st Avenue, Tom Thumb Food Markets, 590 So. Marschall Road, and Sabroso Inc., 1120 East 1st Avenue. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Sweeney/Amundson offered Resolution No. 5239, A Resolution Appointing Judges of Election and Establishing Compensation, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Official Proceedings of the October 5, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 10 Sweeney/Amundson moved to authorize the proper city officials to execute an agreement with US West for telephone services contingent upon City Attorney review. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Sweeney/Amundson moved to authorize staff to pay off the assessment balance on the new fire station site (parcel 27-908069-2) in the amount of$44,958.35 and prepare a budget amendment in order to facilitate the sale of property for Evergreen Heights. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Regarding the Outdoor Heritage Education Center (OHEC) on 2-3 acres of land at Murphy's Landing, Mark LaBarbera, Chairman/President of OHEC approached the podium and asked for approval of the concept of the proposed center, and authorization to enter into an acceptable lease for OHEC with the City at Murphy's Landing. He described this center as primarily a fish and wildlife museum with an educational facility with classrooms, a multi- purpose room and a theater, an environmental learning site, as well as a tourist attraction and an economic cultural and civic asset. Mr. LaBarbera explained that the mission is to serve the community, the region and the country by becoming a fmancially independent facility for historic, cultural and educational efforts with a reputation for quality exhibits, materials and programs that encourage a better understanding, appreciation and sense of stewardship for the environment, natural resources, professional resource management and related activities. Mr. LaBarbera explained that construction would not begin until all the funds to build and operate the Center for three years are raised. Admissions, office rent, facility rental, and fund raising events are anticipated to cover the cost of operations beyond the three year time frame. He said the reliance on donations is very small. In addition, the Minnesota Deer Hunter's Association has already invested in feasibility studies and design of the display. They have also received a grant for up to $400,000 if they can match it. They have pledged to secure the funds to match that and to oversee the construction of the main exhibit area at the Shakopee location. The building will be 30,000 sq. ft. and the project will cost about $2.9 million. A discussion was held regarding operating costs and costs beyond the three years. Cncl. Sweeney stated that he would like to see a letter of credit for utilities and maintenance of the building for the life of the lease. Brekke/DuBois moved to direct staff to begin negotiations with OHEC and Murphy's Landing and to come back with a proposal for moving forward with an outdoor heritage education center, as well as a recommendation on a lease agreement. Motion carried 4-1 with Cncl. Sweeney opposed. Official Proceedings of the October 5, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 11 Paul Snook stated that the Council is asked to direct staff to acquire certain excess MnDOT right-of-way property located at the northeast corner of U.S. Hwy 169 and County Hwy 69, and initiate a Request for Proposal (RFP) process for the acquisition and development of the property by a private developer(s). Paul Snook reported that staff recently met with a commercial real estate broker and the broker's client/interested developer regarding the possibilities of the interested developer acquiring property through conveyance from MnDOT to the City, and then the City selling to the interested party. The property is a 23.52 acre tract of MnDOT excess right-of-way that was under consideration for the proposed Centres Group development back in 1996. At that time, work was initiated by the City for the property to be conveyed from MnDOT to the City. In December, 1996, MnDOT informed the City that the property could be conveyed at a value of $787,596 or $33,486 per acre. Mr. Snook said the interested developer has offered $50,000 per acre for this property. Paul Snook said that MnDOT has notified the City that it will not allow the City to take proposals on this unless the title is held by the City. If MnDot takes proposals, they will sell it to the highest bidder, and retain the proceeds. Therefore, the City will need to buy the property from MnDOT before seeking RFP's. He said MnDOT is still willing to sell the property to the city at the 1996 appraised value and has indicated a strong desire to get this sold as soon as possible. The funds for this would come from the General Fund balance. The minimum purchase price would be $50,000 / acre or $1,176,000 as offered by the interested party. Proceeds from the accepted proposal would be used to reimburse the City for the cost of acquiring the property from MnDOT. A discussion was held regarding possible contamination. Mark McNeil stated that MnDOT would provide a clean site. Amundson/Sweeney moved to direct staff to acquire the excess MnDOT right-of-way property, located at the northeast corner of U.S. Hwy 169 and County Hwy 69, and initiate a Request for Proposal process for both the acquisition and development of the property. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Amundson moved to authorize the appropriate City staff to enter into an agreement with DCA that is approved by the City Attorney to provide a flexible spending administration effective January 1, 2000. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Regarding the employee group health insurance, Gregg Voxland said that for 2000, the rates for the City are increasing 31.1%. He said that being in the South West/West Central Service Cooperative Pool has not yet influenced the rates upward or downward due to the rates for Official Proceedings of the October 5, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 12 other entities in the pool. He said the effect of the pooling was to set a minimum of 16% and a maximum of 49% increase in rates. The two biggest factors in the rate increase are the amount of claims and the increasing cost of medical care. A third factor is that the past two years Blue Cross/Blue Shield (Blues) has underestimated the increase in the amount of claims and increased cost of medical care. Gregg Voxland explained that the cost to employees with family coverage for 1999 was $151.86. For 2000 that cost will go to $297.78 for an increase of $145.92 per month. The City contribution for 1999 is $381.66 and with a $20 increase it would be $401.66 in 2000. He said to keep the City contribution at the same percentage as 1999, an increase of $120 per month would be needed. Gregg Voxland said staff will be meeting with Blue Cross to get more information on the factors that went into the rates for 2000. Information on alternative plans will also be obtained. Following that, input will be obtained from employees and the issue brought back to Council. A discussion was held regarding family and single coverage options and placing a cap on the rebate to employees with single coverage. A recess was taken at 10:29 p.m. for the purpose of conducting the Economic Development Authority meeting. The meeting re-convened at 10:30 p.m. Sweeney/Link moved to adjourn to Tuesday, October 12, at 5:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. rithS. Cox ityr Esther TenEyck Recording Secretary :// r CITY OF SHAKOPEE tAik '2 � Memorandum A TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: City Bill List DATE: December 29, 1999 Introduction and Background Attached is a print out showing the division budget status for 1999 based on data entered as of 12/29/99 . Also attached is a regular council bill list for invoices processed to date for council approval . Included in the checklist but under the control of the EDA are checks for the EDA General Fund (code 0191) in the amount of $0 .00 . Also included in the checklist but under the control of the S.W. Metro Drug Task Force (code 9825) are checks in the amount of $0 . 00 . Action Requested Move to approve the bills in the amount of $751, 356 . 00 . s CITY OF SHAKOPEE • EXPENSES BY DEPARTMENT 12/29/99 CURRENT YEAR ANNUAL MONTH TO PERCENT • DEPT DEPT NAME BUDGET ACTUAL DATE EXPENDED 11 MAYOR & COUNCIL 104,080 303 93,979 90 12 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 219,200 12,846 184,359 84 13 CITY CLERK 201,220 11,531 176,422 88 15 FINANCE 363,770 15,891 330,795 91 16 LEGAL COUNSEL 327,000 6,934 323,524 99 17 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 737,468 60,367 544,301 74 18 GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 242,230 15,569 188,035 78 31 POLICE 1,935,121 156,734 1,828,823 95 32 FIRE 618,420 67,997 543,396 88 33 INSPECTION-BLDG-PLMBG-HTG 340,962 28,201 332,883 98 41 ENGINEERING 507,620 35,132 - 468,003 92 42 STREET MAINTENANCE 862,730 32,326 676,337 78 44 SHOP 145,330 14,144 141,245 97 46 PARK MAINTENANCE 492,090 33,397 435,132 88 91 UNALLOCATED 3,301,950 -668,473 433,516 13 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 10,399,191 -177,101 6,700,751 64 = ==_ ======== ========= ==== 17 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 676,180 42,706 543,867 80 TOTAL TRANSIT 676,180 42,706 543,867 80 00 N/A - 0 0 785 0 19 EDA 403,170 4,344 149,002 37 TOTAL EDA 403,170 4,344 149,787 37 a) til it p4 _ �a C14 as aaa aaaa a as a as a a a a a xxxx x N H H H H H H HHHH H H H H H H H H H H H 0 0 0 0 0 H N H X w CA 0 Po m aX 01 H p z 0 A 0 . 000 0) W M M M N U M M M H CO LO LID '.OWO%O a0OOa0 0)N 0 HN ClJ d' NM sr Ln 0 N H H NNN 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H H H H H H H H CO In H.--I H H r-1 HH V' H H H '--I H 0)Ol 01 0) 10 N LD 10 N N N l0 t0 LID N l0 N LID l0 l0 LO N N N N N N L. M H AAAL. 0000 1'' 0 t0 0 00 0 0 sr sr amd 0 00 G..Gr1.1 I ' 0000 0) N O H Ln cr a0 O O O O a) O O O HH Cl t0 CO 0 Cl H Hr--1H 0 H N O N CO CO a0 N H H w N O H H CO CO CO H N N N N N N N H IX H N t0 H H H Cl N N N H t0 t0 Cl H H H Cl H H 0 Cl m m M Cl W N NM NNN sr sr sr sr N V'Sr sr NN N d' N N N d'W sr V' V' OPO I . I . I L 1 l1 1 . 1 . I . . . L . I . 1 1 L 1 . O I N 0 0 N N N HHHH N N H W N N N CO N N Cl HHHm H O H V'Ln Hr-IH MLID HH H V'H t0 HH H In H H H NNMt0 N 4 01 a00) Ol0101 HHMM 0) V'N Cl 0101 0) 10 0) al al r-1MMM V' O 0)al O O O 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 t0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r-I H o a GI >. 0 at u) Cl) CO U) Lti H W 0 U 0al W a m Hal I alHW HH P4 rx H a X E 00F IxZ w w a W W a a z a H Cl) En H al P4 P4 H U (a� c�ilv�i RI rC 0a co co U) Ty a 0 >� H H Z r-I Ln W W Z W >i HHa 00 E-' 0 0a) W 4 F WWWW 0 A gc al E. AZ ZiZiZi P4 P4 H 0001 W 0 W z'Zz"Z H at Fm WWN WHHW WW m COV' 0 W X 0000 U) HW Xfq'b 0HHX co co U) N0 0 C7 0 xxxx co 0 co cX Z-.-1 4 4 4 04 W 00 l . Z tx a a a a W A' O W OWN H u:H t0 F H W H O 00 H 01 d' W W W W W W 0 0H U]aa-1 mWWA to al al 0 HH N .-a 0 d' H .-a..a.afa 0 Go alZ HWZ 0aa01 m WW a 00 U) H Cl Cl FIC WWWW P4 .4 AH XAO a00W V. AA a 00 N [t. N N 3 HHRH a - xxxx Lrn as HE-' co U)U)U)U) V' WW Z.. 0000 41,44 U)U) WW HHHH 000 0000 � 00 CI. i i Ix Ix 1:4 P4 0 Z Z Z >1>4>+>+ x P4 P4 0 1=4 4 WWWW 0 HHH HHRH P4 HH as co co co co - U)U) HFHH F >i C4 a W W U)U)U) WWWW Z Z H H H w g co co cn co rk HH www aaaa. H ww H C4 r4 q 0 EnU)U]U) w 0q H H 0 0 0 •-•,,,,,,,PP ",d' U 0 0 rx H WWWW U) W IX as aaa c c w 00 Cl) P4 a, 0 UH) UH) N aPw4aPw4 Z P, 00 WWW aaaa a H U)W p4 W W0 HHHH H c4 r4 U)U)U) �C.>� '<y4 H 3 3 w 3 3 3 3 a as 0000 H0 00 0 0 AA O A A X H XXZ >»> w UU a as U H H FHHH rx U)cn 000 rx 4 HH X Z a H U WW AAA 0000 00 W xx P4 H \ \ W Qt.x tS '2S Ul '0 as,.a www c7 C7 C7 c7 FC I:4 I:4 n UU W H U X N HHFF W 4r.0 cr aaaa 0 WW H 0 U) t) N FC AA Ci.Ci.[=. C7C0C0C7 H XZ Z ZZ a cn p 3 4444 I * * * * * * * * * * * * * * SN0000) N Ovr va OO U)H t0 00 O t0 t0 00 000 00 L1)U) 0101 00 00 N N N M 01 0 H O0 O aV0 a0 ' NU)10 OONLf N 00 000 00 Lel 01) 1010 00 MM V'V' 00 Ln HU)0001 0 00 O1010 V'105(0 t001)0001 In Ln ONN NN tONa0 00 (000 LOW HH V'W HlOHHO N O MM OtOW N V'H0O 10 c-1 t? 0 HH OILS SN Ht0N 0)0) to l0 1)In Ns NN rimH-HHN 0) U)U) Ln 01 V' V'0 t/>-N tQt? tn- LOW 01414 N N N H M NI"- HH H r-I LOW to t0 in-in-in-in-i) N .t? t?t? t/}t/}t/). t?t? in-i/} t? HH N N U) H N 0 0 0 in U) t0 l0 t0 10 U)U) .'� t/}t/} H 4/)-H CO- t/)- 0 t0 10 t?i/} H H t?t/)- t/}t/} O 4/1- t/} to t/}in t?i/)- W i/} {11- N /}x C4 U w H U) W -N . SN NSN NNNN N NN N s N N N N N HHrtH H H El N N N N N N NNNN N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 O 0 µ \ \\ \\\ \\\\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \ W A N N N NNN NNNN N N N N N N N N N N N Hr-1HH .-I P4 H H H H H H HHHH H H H H H H H H H H H 0 0 0 0 0 ,4 U 01 01 01 01 O1 01 0/0/0101 0) 01 01 01 01 0) al 0) al 0) 0) O O O O O U W 01 01 01 01 01 O1 01 01 01 01 01 al al 01 01 01 01 a1 01 01 O1 O O O O O w N al 01 01 0,0)0) 01 01 01 01 01 ON 01 0) 0)0) 01 0) 0) 0) 0) O O O O O U U H HH HHH riHHH H HH H HH H H H H H NNNN N 0 0 Z 03 0) 0 H N Cl V' Ln to N a) 01 0 H N H U) U) t0 t0 - t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 L� N N 0 '4 01 A 01 A 01 A 01 A 01A 01 A 01A 01- A 01A 01A CAA O) A 01A 01 A 01 0 M* M * Cl * Cl * Mir Cl * M* M - * M* M* M* M* Mir Cl * Cl 0 ril t0 V l0 V t0 V l0 V l0 V t0 V WV t0 V t0 V l0 V WV t0 V t0 V t0 V t0 U 0 • N (1) U) m L1. .'7 x x M x M x x xxxxxx x x x x x x x M N Z 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 ri V H x C4 01 0 Cn 01 a X H p H z 0 Z 0) w N U in H N O 0 0\ 01 O O f` ' M d' 1.0 H co00 l0 01 6\O1 01 01 01 U) M Q1 co d' H ri l0 0 U)to V' N d' 01 CO ri'-i ri H r-I H V' M M a0 H N 010)0) M N M M co LOU) V' N l0 l0 l0 SIn M N H d' 1D N r H N O H H l0 LO N d' O H H H H H H N 01 O O 01 d' co O O 01 O N N W 1D 10 ri M V'd'd'V'V'd' N H in 0 0\ rL H 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln in O O O O H H H H H 01 d'Ln H 01 H rl H ri H H H V' H H H H M H H ''Z.Lx M N N N M N N N M N N N N N N M N M N N N Ln N N '.�W d' d' d'W d' d'd' N d' d'd'd'V'd•V V V' V' d' d' N V' d'V 0 W I I I . I I . . I III I I I I i I I I I I I U H H M M N H H 0 H H H N 0 ri ri H l0 H N d' O 00 H H U N U) Ln Ln in N d' W N CO H CO M N(V H N CO N N V' M N d' g. d' N N b b M d' co M rl M H 10 V'M M V' H V V 00 d' V'V' O O 0 0 O 0 0 0) O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 01 01 0 0 Z z H H z z H H CO 4 r4 U cn Cx CU W cn U W Z H Cl) U)CO \ x a H co co O u)U]Ul H C) a co co CO 1> w al al a Z a www www a Z 1 al al H 04 H HH 0 W 0 HHHHHH C4 W c4 HH H w a as CO H CO .1.1.1.4.1.1 w H w a Cl) a as x z 4 x aaaaaa CO Z Cl) as FA al ]C4 C) H Cu U aaaaaa H as MDOx�� as Cl) Z Cl) u,�n w � CO w cncnrnmwm z z al En z EEnEn W O C9 C7 C9 U H H Cx U C9 C7 0 C9 C7 C9 O H O Cl) Cl) W 0 C9 A H Z 'r Z.Z z '7-Z 7-i zi'T-�7.'z.�Tr'Zi H �f-a H Cl) H HH W W W HHHHHH CO W co X HH ill 0) LHl HH 124X U ix HHHHLH�H Cl) X Cl) H H U 1> HH W Lx PS P4 Ci. H U • GL. ��( D Ix ix. H G.. W W • c4 al C4 Ill CC C4 C) �P: 0 W WW Z JL4 0 Z WWWWWW 0 0 0 H H 0 C). WW 0. 0 00 0U WX U 0U 000000 a 01 a X V X 00 w Zz a H H 0 U • 00 0 z2 X x H U '7 H H co)HHH HH x III En H z HH H U U H C4 0 0 co a 0U C) C)0 a Z H cx H 0 H H 0 H zz A zH H H aaaaaa a z z a H Cl) C4 N� W Z W 00 al 000AAA Cl) H 1> H o HH x X I. Z 000000 xo Z acxrxo4cxa A ci ,wj `�`� ' OOZ oCto7o o 0 x W ) iZas x H aH UCl) , wwwwww w z a sC w u)m 43 41 a oo w CCCxicx)UCxi a CO 0 H H HH x H III o gc .�.� ���,� H H a >. x z o zz �� 2 x wwwaww Cl) co 0 X4W x HH ��� ��'� CO al 1:4 v U C.)C) * * * * * 0 0 ri ri 0 0 0 0 0 U)o Ln 0 0 0 0 d'N L-M d'V'O\ 0 0 V.x)' O O V.d' in L*n 0 0 0 0 Ln(V .7 0 0 N N N O 0 Ul Ln co Ln M 0 0 0 0 01 d'd'L-N N 0 d'V' ri H 0 0 N N H ri 0 0 0 0 ri 00 Ln N V'd' d'o V' N l- M N l0 0 0 d'V' N H ri 0 0 000 V.d' N b 0 0 CO 00 01 01 0 0 0 0 M H 0 M N V}V} CO-LO U) 0 0 d'01 M Ln U) 0 0 00 V'd'N N N N 0 0 ri ri 00 00 ri H 0 0 LU N 0 0 Ln M i41-44- Ln Ln N V}M d'd' Ln U) V}V)•Vf i/}V}V}N ri H i.0-4.0- 10 10 H rl l0 l0 V'd' M M M ri Vf V} V} V} Vf V} . . V} V}V} V?0)- V}V} V}V} i/}4.0- h a) H H HH H V).}V} V}V} V}V} W M Lx U W H Cl) W ra H riH H H H H H HHHHHH H H H H H H H H H H H 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 4 '- �� � �� ������ � ' � � � �,,, W A H H H ri H H H H ri r♦H H H H H H H H H H H ri H ri D 0 0 00 0 00 0 o 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 •4 U o 0 00 0 00 0 0 000000 O o 0 0 0 0 0 00 U W o 0 00 0 00 O o 000000 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 00 UW x o O 00 0 00 o O 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 I-1 z N M V' Ln l0 N co 01 0 H N M V U) l0 N H N S N N N N S t` co co co co co co co co C) .''4 01 A 01 A 01 A 01 A 01 A 01 A 01 A 01 A 01 A 0\ A 01 A 01 A 01 A 01 A 01 A 01 Z U M* M* M * M* M 41 M* M* M 91 M* M* M* M* M* M* M* M D U0 lx) %.0 V l0 V U) V l0 V l0 V l0 V 10 V l0 V l0 V l0 V l0 V 10 V W V W V 10 V 10 M s N fi RI D UUU) x x x UUUUXU M x M x U) x x x x Uxx r Z 000 0 0 0 000000 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 H N H M W M 0 U) al a X H p H z o 0 oZ W H CO N 0 N N 0 M N U1 H lL k0 W N d' O M m (Na) in l0 l0 a) N 0 H H H H al 00 ao CO 00 a)co 00 al 10 d'in a) H T to N a) N M d' al a)al al co CO N N.N N N al N M N 111 U1 OD N. 0 M N co M M M r C`N N C` N o 0 0 0 0 H d'a) i0'.0 C` a) N M U1 N H H H H 0 0 0 O O cN M M M M M M 0 O (1 O O 0 N 0 d' M O d'V d' 000 O 0 W d'd'd' r Wd' NN Z al01 0 Cl 0 H N 0 HHH 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ei HM M H H M .7..4'V.4.Latf1 in to H HH H U1 N H U1 H HHH Z 04 N N N N N N N N N N N in N N Cl N N N 1.11 V N M N M M M W d'd'sr d' d' V' d'd'd'd'd'H W d' V' d'd' d' H CO N d' d' V'd'd' 0 a i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i O Z HHH H H H In U)U1 l0 H H H H M Dao H H 0 0 H H H N H 0 0 N N H H N d' N N N N.y'0 W d' N N b C` 0 0 d' H H H IG H 4 Z VD', M d d' a' a V V sr d'0 sr sr H H H H 0 a) a0 al M d'l0 d' 000 0 0 0 0000 o al 00 0 00 o a) N an 0 0 0 loo z0C41 0 41 Ci) W W O al EnW W zzzz > W W W w H W >>> CD H W H H H H WWWW P: H H H Ul 4 x H P;!x rx El a a a EiE-iHH Ul W as a U) W >-I m a . W W W a aEIEi a a Ei ZZZZ W Ul aw a CDE,H a H al, cncnU) H aZZ na a( Z HHHH C7 Ul U) Ul cn H X X Z[x7 W W Q Ul co u) FC > W 0 M4 4 4 cn UlU Z x H 0 a ZZZ 4.1 0 0 0 EiHEaHH0 H H 0 007 0 U El 040 0 0 0 A ZOO Z Z 0 ZZZZ H ZZ Z U FG 0 Z HHH HZZ H H Z WWWW A Cl) HH H 0 FC Z Z H U]U]Ul EiHH E-. E-' H XXZX H CO HH H H U H H (ncnU) P.4 C) 4 g A aaaa 4 X W ig FC 4 x H WWW as cx a .a HHHHUa Ca Ea w tx cx a H Z cx Cx+EL.[xi WHH W W H M7MJP 41 a4 r4 O W W W W 0 0 H W 000 a 0 0 a a 0 OY 0100 0(W P: W W P; a s a od 0 p+ a Lx fx P: owoil o o w WWWwxa X z a oo O w ›i Cl a 0 aaa U Z s 0 Z UU 0� Cl) U] Ca Z 0 UI UI Z U U 0 H r a c4 o4 El 000 • 04 El0 wa W 00 a Cl) 0 H HHH O W W 000000 0 W W U) W O Ul 0 X FC 000000 0404 H ZZ H .l Z Z Ul H 000 00 > HH W W W 0 0 HHH X nn n 0 0 aaaaaa El E-' rx co W W x w • r`NN W H 0 HHHHHH 00 W ilx. Ft Z 000000 ul 0�y l En 4 0U)U)U) cn WWWWZzCOHH UX W wEA E-1 EA UUU - Z C1E4 as H FG fx O UUl0 . 444 0 S 0 c) cnU U) x 00 A 44 0 Ca EiHEi .7 U toUlUlmUlUl EA E-1 W Ea C) H .1 a Z EiE-(Ei Z Z Z ..i1 a a W W WWWW U U W PC a a 0 A (i]ul ul UUU A A A 000000 Pei Pei Cx. 00 x x x U) H H HHH K is K is # # is K K K * is # K N O M 00 U) a0 a0 l0 i0 o O N M U1 O 0 U)co M 0 O U1 a0 M d'd' H H 0 0 O O l0 l0 O O 0 0 0 E. H0.4.1.0 10 10 Mal d'd' 0000 d'o U) a)U)W d'd' r-H a) 01 01 0 o 0 o O o O o O o lO ao s in CO d'O N 0 o CA rn N N l0 VD l0 l0 OD U)r dfl H un HH N OD Ln l0 VD o 0 0 0 0•o H H U)U) U)o("1 0MO O N N N to U) Ul Ul H H d'd'M ao d' M d'N cc.co l-M H 4/)-v)- H H (NI N U)U) 10 10 d'V' d'%s)N N co-HOD [N d' H Hi/)-in- V}t/-H H N CA U1 C`4.11-r- H H U).V11-1/40 0 0 L}L? W V N N in- M 1/? t?V} 1?V? V VI- {/}4,/} L)- +? W.W- VD ii.)- 10-1/} .C/1- H )-H N d' d' d' alai 4 11)-VT VT V} VT VT(A- C) }U W M (x 0 W Ei Ul W HHH H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H ti 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C9 a' \\\ \ \ \ \\\\\\ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ W A HHH H H H HHHHHH H H HH H H H H H H H HH H 1x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 OOo 0 0 0 000000 00 0 0O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0aa 0 W 000 0 0 0 000000 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 W x 000 0 0 0 000000 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 M 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U 0 0 Z N co a) O H N M V U1 l0 N co a) O H HT A a1 A al A d\01 0 a0 a0 a) a1 an a) an a) a) a) a) a) 0 0 C) .�. d> AA al A al N -a) A Ol A 01A 01A MA al A OA 0 Z 0 M K M k M'K M K M * M is (1K M K M* M K M* M K M* d'* Tr lfl V 1p V l0 V l0 V l0 V l0 V l0 V l0 V l0 V l0 V l0 V 1D V l0 V l0 V ..0D 0 U U v' v 01 0. Qa xxx x x x x x x x xxxxxx x M xxxxxx x M s i 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 0 00 000000 0 00 H N H x w 01 0 M 01 a X H p H z 0 al 0 z rnrn . al rn fil N U WM H M 00 a) 01 OHNM V'in o\ ril a)41 Ln OILn 0 m to O 01 Ln 01 H Mcr0 W in r•-• 01 000000 H M Ln 1O Ln H M N to c0 O1 N N h V'N H co 10 co 01 O1 01 O1 01 O1 01 w 0 HHH 0 V 0 V' H N N NNN0omto N co at NNNNNN N >H H V.d'V' 01 '4. 0 c' M 0 O m m m m V'cr 0 to to 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 H H H 01 H N H 01 0 O HHHHHH 0 H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 0 00 000000 H 00 H HHri H H H H In m H HriHHHH 01 HH HHMHHM In HH Z 1:4 M M M m N N N N M m N N N N N N M m m N N M N V'M rl m m '.7 111 V'V'd' V' N V N V' V V' N N N N N N V V'V cr vi.VV VV cr V V V.d' 0 W i i 1 i i I I i i 111111 i i 111111 i i i OZ HHH H 0 r H 0 H H H 000000 H 0101 MM el MMM H HH 0 H H H co V' V' V' Ti. m m V'V'V'V'V'V' N l0 10 H H H H H H H ID 10 µ' V'V'V' H 00 cr O V' m m 00000000000 H <D\O H H M H H H M m m O O O O 01 0 01 O O O 01 01 01 01 01 01 O 19 l0 01010010101 0 0 0 z H z W14 14 ril HEl UUUUUU U w Ill 0 0U Z HHH H a U] 1p-1 W H aaaaaa . HH 0]U)[r]UO w H HH 0 aaa a4 r� H FC 0 a f�f�a4f�WW i-1 r> wwUw 0 H >9 F4 r;4 CA 4i'4 0 c4 c4 H H Z H Z 4 c4 E4 w w w w >i a >i w w >+>i>+>'>'>i 0 w w a a w a w to w w a u]cnv] w 4 a itt E-' Cl) 1444444 x u]m aa.Ha H Z cnu] H a a a Cl) a aaaaaa U a a f n a CO W ° U x) . w a] w w al FC wwwwww \ '7'�H'7 ` a m Z Z Z z C7 U Cl) a Z 0000oo w ZZ cnwa) Cl)o o zz WQ 000 O C7 f14 H ,D 0 fi4 0 00 U]z tom!] 0 00 W U]U] U] Z \ 0Hzz f] G7 W U] H H\H U]\ U] W U] u]ww Cl) U El U i a m UUUUUU a U]U] HHi-7H 1-7 C4 ww www w w w w ww w ,aw ww a w ls. Ci. • • 0 > w • • • • • • w a a 000 0 o w o a KC 0 000000 Z 00 w11w4RIZFx( a 00 aaa a U 0 U Z Eai a •0UUC�UU oU aw a.a. 0 as 0 z H El E-I ZZZ HNxxHzZH HH U >i HHHHHH 1-2 > > aCQO asqZZ W > W aa x 0 zEZH U] Z MaaaRU] w H H H H H Z H FC H 000000 U a 1-.11-1 a a a p > E'E-+E+ x U 0 a4 0 aaaaaa H KCfr4 N WW U]U]Ua)] U p x a a a) a a P Z H H HEwH 4 Z O 0 v] 1-7 C0 E1HEiHNEl a4 4 4 HHHHHH4 X w ccnnccnn 0 a z a' w z zzzzzz 0 P U cncncncntn z HHHH FC x a w Cl) H wwwwwwww zzzzzz H 14 1-1 HHH 1-1 Z 111 £ aa4aa4a4[>: x n HHHHHH w U >i wH 0 Ix) aaaaaa U III xaaaaa asaaaaaaHHH h h x) aa a ,X # i. .k i' is 4, i' is is is -k -K is N CO L.N V V 00 N N 00 0 In 00 00 OOLCI 000Ln 00 000 V'oOLNL-V'N 00 NN El BON 0101 HH 00 03 c0 00 00 V'cr IO IO OOI-OOON O0 000 ONO011n Om m m 1010 N 01 N 01 V'V' 0 O Ln Ln 0 0 0 0 N N 01 01 O O M 0 0 0 M 0 0 In Ln 0 N V 10 In 01 al h cr V' (CI IO 0 Ln m to co N N In Ln N N In mL-N m m N N N In 01 Ln in In V' m m O m V' tocr V]•M m H l N N H H N c4V' .44 V m H H ' H H Cr V' ri H V1-tf} 00 0o d'V'm V•V'V'lO N N 0 10 1/40 i?Lf in-H H m mm Ns V)-L? - - . . i?t? t?V? in.if} 7/}L? . . V?V)-i?L}i?if? . i?if} . . . V}i/}i? in-i? L}in- HN 1.0 In NN N H H N V}i? int V} V?t? V} V}V}in- W M a' 0 W H cn w Hri ri H H H H H H H HHHHHrl H HH HHHHriH H HH H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 QI ,' \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\ \ \\ \\\\\\ \ \\ W Q H H H H H H H H H H HHHHHH H H H HHHHHH H .H H I 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 U 000 O O O O O O O 000000 O 00 000000 O 00 0 w O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O w x 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 4 Z H N m V' in to N a) 01 0 H N m V' H 0 0 O O O 0 CD 0 O H H H H H U .Y. 0 A OA OA OA OA OA OA OA 0 A O A 0 A 0 A 0 A 0 Z 0 V' i. V'# V'i. V'* V'* V'* V# V'is V' w•11 0 . ID V l 1.1)0 V V lfl V lO V 10 V IO V l0 V 1.9 V l0 V l0 V 10 V IO V 10 U U U) a) trim a, a 4 0 0 0 00000000000 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 00 H E N H -- a W m O CQ m wX H H U Q z o1 W lD N U ko H N OD CO CO CO 03 CO CO CO a)03 CO O H M d' 0) 0 r H O U) 0 00000000000 N OH H 0 H N M (V al a) op 0) OCA 0)0)01 01 01 O1 0)01 01 a> 0) N N N N 0) 0) H rl T m CO Tr r o r r r r r r r r r r r r M O O O N r O O r M M H d• O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) co a0 a) O O O d' O d'd' H 0 a) 00000000000 O d' NN N 0 0 H a0 O H H O 0 0 00000000000 o U) 000 r o 0 0 0 00 H H m U) 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 CO CO CO CO co M d'd'd' r H ri H a0 H ri za N U) N MMMMMMMMMMM M d' N N N d' M N N M NN W N V' d' W d'd'd'W d'd'd'd'W W d' d• d'd'W Cl d' d' d' d' N N O a) i i I I I i I i I I 1 1 i i I I i I I I I I I I I I UX O coU) Ha0N rl ri NHO W Md' W H rl rlrl d• H H H r 00 0'fJ d' Cl N CVNU)rIN00a0MU)U)(NI N H Nd'H O rl Cl H N .4,‘1, aZ a0 d• W M lOr M d'rl rl lDNN M lD Cl Md'M a0 M H d• d' 00.10 on 01 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O O O O 0101 z 0 H H O UUU cn W W H Grl H U) �W-1 1 aElE H > H- WWWWWWWWWWW W 41 GI)H w w W ›>+ a, 4 U U U U U U U U U U U U - Z z z H cn a U 4 4 H a, HHHHHHHHHHH H U) HHH H a, H au au C4 Ul »9>99>>99l l Z r.C4X >r.0 H .1 U W El w aaaaaaaaaaa a 0 cn a WW U) C7 Z Cl) WWWWWWWWWWW W H H Z W C7 C7 W a W H UIU]UOU]WWUOU)V)U]U] Cl) H HHH H 0 0 U] 7U) O x W 1 >4 7+y+74>+>4>4 y+>4>i>+ yi H W W W FC U) H U > HHHHHHHHHHH El a XXX U) H H 0U O HHHHHHHHHHH H 0 GU GU a, x W H • C4 U .1.1.1.1.1.1.1.4.1.1.1 .1 U) HHH H I4 g U) .1 O W a HHHHHHHHHHH H U) D'..) J '`7 0 W W H 00 U H• X D D DJ:7:30t) D D U) WWW >4 LL 0 0 a UU IX U) O• 0 H U W U a M .1 H 0 zz U Ua. 0 Cu x x 0H a W a,a w a,Cu Cu Cu a,aa a a, >1 W W W H 0 a Z Z O W Z ����������-„ W aaa 4 a, 00 Z XH 4444a'iaia'iFC4FC4 FC z HHH Z C7 W aru) W 0 C7 a rz..G4ri.. z a alai M 0 Z 00000000000 0 0 l4 H ZX H W 00000000000 0 El >+)+>+ 0 U) a 00 O X U)U)EU)U)U)U)u)U)U)U) En H 444 ) 4 )x .1 H 84444 4 4444444 4 g4 H O H H HH r.0 cn Cz7 Cz7 Cz7 C7 CD z7 CD z7 Cz7 Cz7 CD z7 CD z7 CCD 0 z a x cn u) Z 41 4141414141414141414143 410 z 0 ZZZZZzzzzzZ E 0 000 Q a Cl. a au aa4 U• z H XXXZXXXXXXX H E XXX Z X z Oz z 00 * * * * * * * * * * 4, 4, * 4, d' 0 0 0 0 ri H N rl H N d'0 01 01 a0 OD a0 N l0 W 0 o O H Cl d' 0 0 0 0 a0 a) ri rl r r 0 O O H�i. Cl 0 0 0 0 H H U)N M M%.0d'0 d'lU H )H d' H H a0 c0 N al to lO 00 00 0101 0 0 U)U) 000 i--� Cl OO OO rH ri d'rrird•U)NWHWN O ri rl VD 0M CA 01 U)U) NN OO WW r'C' 000 O Cl U)U) O O d'd' ri r ri d'0)O O lD OD M ri U) r r co 00 M U)U)d' O O H rl N N op co U)U) 10 U)0 d• d'd' O1 01 i?t? d't?rl CO W ri 00 4/1-1111 01 r Cl H ri N N t/)-N rl d' N N t/}V)- t/}t/} W d• H H d'd'01 V}V} s s t? i?t/)- -t/}t/} ..1.1)- . t?i/} to-1/)- i/}in}L)- tn-t? 5 5 t?L? t/}i/}t/} ri lD to H - H N 01 H H t/} t/}{/} t/} i?t? t? d?{/} 0 W x a U W H U) W H H H ri ri riH ri ri rl rl riH rl H H HHrl H H H H H HH H H 0 0 0 00000000000 0- 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 00 U g4 ., ����������� ,,,,,, ' S �� W 0 H H H ri H ri rl rl ri ri ri ri ri ri H H rl H ri H H H H H H H a o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5- � ����������� 5- ��� � ,,. �� D4 U 0 0 0 00000000000 O 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 00 U W o 0 o 00000000000 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 00 W Z 0 0 0 00000000000 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 00 U 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U 0 1-1 Z U) W r al 01 0 H N Cl d' U) lD N H H H H H H N N N N N N N N U A ° A on OA 0 A O A o n 0 A OA OA on on on O A Z U * d'* d'* d'* d' 4, d'* d'* d' * d'* d'* d'* d'* d'* d' * a W V lD V VD V lD V W V WV WVW V WV WV WV WV WV W V O Z U U Io CD LIi a a Kt N z 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 Ho 0 00 00 q H W w 0, o w m ax H p H z U A z0 O, 41 N U HH 0 N H H HH H 0 N H N ) M N d� H rl l0 lO O N L� W U) NCO 7-. N N r N M N CO a0 lO aa O'l O\Oi M N NW H N [�N H M H O H H O Oo O V' H H t0 O r 5 5 0 O) r ri U) H V' O [� M;;II 0 L� o t0 0 t0 O O 0 d�er 01 O O ri rl N H O 0 cOV, M N rl l0 0 0 o 0 co �'di M NN NN H 9 0 N M M 0 H O O O00 d' O O O O O O O rl ri�-{ 0 0 0 O O HrL N M N N N N N M M rl H H N N N HH H MM HH N V N N MMM M M M N N N N O W d• d� I w�r w w Cr V� Tr w V' I -r Tr w V�w w I V�V� 0 H H H I I I I I I I ) ) U r1 in N U)U) Cr V' LU r1 N H H N M U)U) M MH HH LO ri rH1 HH �.'Zi M H M O O O O r M M M H W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O) 0 000 WhN 00 0 0 r M M M 00 O O W U CO W W co co U co2 En co z H H H U H H > W W H > z W W H H H U)U] H a WFAH H U H H rx a a WW HH i o Q z H H as a H aE-1 D-1 a mm W HH as A z 2 4 gg mu) H H r./) 6 cD Z W W 22 HH J,7 3 CD a H H W 22 HH R H z 2 2 z`Z+'Z'+ HH H 22 H W a H H H H H UU) U) 01 H H 000 U]U) U1 ED H H 1.I w g al al C C z w H E www ww w AA a� w 0 I:4 bD as a a 0 W a w a a a 00 O H H W 0 a r.� U)U) 00 a a W a 0 0 HHH as a :fl o0 2 Z • CO 00 H H U 2 a H 4 00 W Wal H H W v] 2 a w 0000 as HH 0 WH ff ID a ww 00 a 43 A as ID C7 a H 00 aU zz W H H H C4 H XX HH 0000W U) U) a 000 [*.WHH ,-1 HH 00 Ul 000 G4 G4 HH 00 H 0 H a HH HH 00 H H U U SCSC Z7, W 0 Izi W W HFH U)ci) Cm C7 iWww 00 U H WWW �>1 W asZ 0 a s I U) H f $$3 WW I U x Hv,-,,,X �� G4 a x 0 0 D U)UI as W W H mm' l U1 U1 22 O H o a a a U1 v! U]U] cp m H H H H D�� PD H �� 33 * * * * * * * * H H 010\ 00 M NU) N rV' 00 00 * * * * * * H in Ln MM 00 01O)do Ln MO1 00 00 MM WW 00 U)U) MN0001 "NU) U)U) Lfl co" e�74 NN HH 00 co co 00000N V U101 Nh MU)01 Ln[r0 NN Vr V' MM OOH HrU) Ln0 V'NON 01NW CO CO NO)O OM V' 1010 LOU) SN tOWN r-i�L� 0M HH MM 00 HH NN NN d'00 01HH OW Md'o7 10110 FCy i?L} GO CO 01 O) N N Ln N rl M H rl C4-4/} i?V� N N 0o co H H i?i?L�i? V�M co 01 0) (1i}M (15 H L}L} irin- i?i/?L} i?L} L?i/} L}i?X NNHHt?L}t? t?t/} yr Lr thL}U MMWt�U) UWH0 W H H H 0 0 0 H0 H H ri r1 r1 H 0 r1 H H H H H H C7 \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \CD CD CD CD CD". �\ 0 0 o a W 0 H ri Si H H H H H r1 H H rl ri H H H H H H H H \H x .�4 \ \ \ o\ o� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ \ \ o o \\\ \\ ...o.' \ \\ U o 0 c, 0 0 0 0 W 0 x 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0. 000 • 00 00 00 U U N N 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O • O O N N N N N N N N N N0 N NNN N N N N N N N a 2 NO NO) O H N M I. in t0 r H M M M M L) M al o H N M 0 ''4 O A O A O A 0 A cl O A O A O A O A O A O A O A O .41 «07r U d.* d•* d.* d. * 'dl * A O A O iA 0 A 0 A O U W V W V tO V t0 V t0 V t0 V l0 V W V W V t0 V W V 10 V l0 V t0 V l0 V 10 Kv N it a a M xxxxxxx x x r 0 0000000 0 0 0 H N H P4 W CA 0 01 0) a 1 rn H DI A 0 N Mw I H d'MM ri N ri rn W I I I II II rn N U OICI NWHriH 01 01 H 0 VD 1/40 W N 0 N 01 0 0 0 . . . • • • • O s O M Cr d'd'd'd'd'sr U) M M ri ri ri rirl CO M 0 H H H H H H H H H CO Z H O 0000000 O O Cl H ri HHriHHriH H H CO J C4 N M M M M M M M N CO H W d' Sr d'd'd'd'd'd' d' T' N 0 alI I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 UX w HOOON00 V' l0 N 0z N ri LnNNN to Ul N N H W d'l0 l0 l0 l0 V)W '.0 H O O l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 0 0 0 Z W 41 0000000 U O W D>9>DD W H H a'p4 C4 1:4 04 P4 R4 H P4 H a wwwwwWw a w a a cncncnmcncnEn as Cl) a a, PC 44 PC 44 Pc Cr) W c7 0000000 0 0 0 Z HHHHHHH Z H H UICs)UIUIUIU)UI H Ul H z CO UI UI CO W UI UI HH Cl] in w OD WW41 41 WWWWW w IX C4 Uas IX w 0 L(1 O aaaaaaa 0 a N` IX w x PI H U H a 0 H W H p, a H O 0 UI O a ZZZZZZZ 0 01 HHHHHHH w al H Z • F1o co co Ul U1 UI Cl]UI FC 0 w 8444444 a z 4 Cu xoaOf �a0axx a 41 x x CO CO coil CO coil ctrl coctrl up 41 0 w 3 3333333 al U a * * * * * * 1010 0000 UI OO LI] 00 00 00 0 El lO l0 O000NLOO N 00 OD OD 00 O ri ri NOO l0Hl0 d'N OO LOL(1 rlH l0 0 U1 LL) OMri OD l01001d' OO OD oa NN in Hri Mri on ril-M d'l0 00 MM CI CI M VI-V} VI- .V}V} .t?V} • HH d' N HH CO 0) x V} V} V} v)-v)- 4.r>4n- in U V} W M p U W WW H H ri ri H H H H 01 01 01 H H O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N 0 4 0 0000000 - 0 0 Cu) l H H H rl ri Hr-1 H N NN 1:4O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H - H U O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 01 01 01 U W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 01 01 W x 0 0000000 01 rn 01 M U N N N N N N N N H H H U F1 0 Z LO l0 N a) w d' w H d4 0 A 0 A OA O A OA 0 0 d'* d' * �* �* sr* W l0 V tD V l0 V l0 V l0 V O x O 0 r' a) 17) rtS a0 H N H 01 O1 O1 H U w n of N ' N 0i' to O 0 0 in H 0 OLn CO 0 H M O O O O lf1 O a0 O Ln N W O N H 0 N 0 0 O co LO L0 H M L0 L0 Ln 0 V' N 0 0 al LO si' Ol N d' 10 Ln H N LO 00 N 0 01 H d' d' to N 0) co co- . V} H N N V' CO 0 H H '.0 CO N H 'V i? V? V} CO- 0 VT LO CO- H L} Ln H an- H H H H H H C r z H a w a w �' 0C. C4 w H z H ti) 0 r H Z Ela a "" r40 cpc n H 0 Z H w � Q 0 H w a ��, H ao H X w O CO H 0 Q C4 C4 ril W Pc 4 H H al Cc. CO crl PC El W C/) Z U C7 121 fa' H w U U H CO CO LL' W H W 0 HH 1')H 0 H co N CO 01 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 H V' V' d' V' 'i' 'd' N N N a0 00 H it4:k it it4t1:k 4# 1# 4t it it 4t l EL. w w w w w w w w w w w w 15. A . I. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: Facilities Manager Resignation DATE: December 29, 1999 INTRODUCTION: The Council is asked to accept the resignation of Facilities Manager Ron Stellmaker. BACKGROUND: On Friday,December 17th, Ron Stellmaker submitted his resignation. He has accepted a job in the private sector in Chaska,which will be a step up for him. His last day of work for the City of Shakopee will be January 7th. Staff will research replacement options, and will have a recommendation at a future meeting. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the resignation of Ron Stellmaker be accepted with regret. ACTION REQUIRED: If the Council concurs, it should,by motion, accept with regret the resignation of Ron Stellmaker as Facilities Manager at the Community Center. �n. 1 iv4L L Mark McNeill City Administrator MM:tw CC: Mark McQuillan Is. 8. 1, CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum t r TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Resolution Upholding Continental 95 Fund's Appeal of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals(BOAA)Denial of a Request for a Variance in Sign Area MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 INTRODUCTION: On December 21, 1999 the Council heard Continental 95 Fund's appeal of the BOAA's denial of its request for a variance to allow 514 square feet of signage on the west side of the new Kmart store instead of the permitted 200 square feet. After the Board's decision,the applicant amended its request so that it was requesting only 366.6 square feet of signage. The Council directed staff to prepare a resolution upholding the appeal for possible action on January 4,2000. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve Resolution No. 5301, a resolution upholding the appeal of Continental 95 Fund L.L.C., and granting the requested variance with conditions, as presented. 2. Approve Resolution No. 5301,a resolution upholding the appeal of Continental 95 Fund L.L.C., and granting the requested variance with conditions,with revisions. 3. Do not approve Resolution No. 5301. 4. Table the matter for additional information. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer and approve the Resolution No. 5301 a resolution upholding the appeal of Continental 95 Fund L.L.C., and granting the requested variance with conditions. R. Michael Leek Community Development Director i:\commdev\cc\2000\cc14\\KMart.doc RESOLUTION NO.5301 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE UPHOLDING THE APPEAL OF CONTINENTAL 95 FUND L.L.C.AND GRANTING A 166.6 SQUARE FOOT VARIANCE TO ALLOW A 366.6 SQUARE FOOT SIGN,INSTEAD OF THE PERMITTED 200 SQUARE FEET, ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE KMART BUILDING AT VIERLING DRIVE AND CSAR 17. WHEREAS,the City of Shakopee received an application from Continental 95 Fund L.L.C. (the applicant)dated October 19, 1999,whereby it requested a variance to permit a 314 square foot variance to allow signage of 514 square feet instead of the permitted 200 square feet;and WHEREAS,the proper public hearing notices were sent,posted, or published,and on December 9, 1999 a public hearing on the requested variance was held before the Board of Adjustments and Appeals(BOAA);and WHEREAS,the BOAA denied the requested variance based on its findings that the request did not meet several of the variance criteria contained in the Shakopee City Code: and WHEREAS,the applicant appealed the decision of the BOAA, and its appeal was heard by the City Council at its meeting of December 21, 1999 NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA,that it adopts the following findings relative to the appeal of Continental 95 Fund L.L.C; 1. The property cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under the conditions allowed by the official controls. Specifically,the controls would allow illuminated signage on sides of the building that are visible from nearby residences. The applicant proposes to eliminate such signage in favor of a single sign away from the residences,which sign would have less area than the total sign area allowed for the property. 2. The plight of the property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property. The structure is set back quite far from CSAH 17 to the west, and is directly across from single family residences,both attached and detached, on the east and north. 3. The circumstances result from the location of this property and its zoning in relation to CSAH 17 and the adjacent residential properties,rather than having been created by the applicant. 4. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. 5. The problems extend beyond economic considerations to concerns about impacts on adjacent residential properties; 6. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of City Code Chapter 11 (Zoning)in that it would result in less impact on adjoining residential properties; 7. The request is not a request for a use variance. BE 1T FURTHER RESOLVED,that the appeal by Continental 95 Fund L.L.C.is upheld,and that its request for a 166.6 square foot variance to permit a sign with an area of 366.6 feet instead of the permitted 200 square feet on the west side of the Kmart building at Vierling Drive and CSAH 17 with the following conditions; a. There shall be no signage on the north,east,or south side of structure. b. The only sign permitted by this variance is the 366.6 square foot`Big Kmart" sign shown on the drawing dated 8/9/99. c. This approval shall not constitute approval of any other building,pylon,or freestanding signs on the subject property. d. This variance shall be void if the sign is not erected within one(1)year of the approval of this resolution. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,Minnesota,held the day of ,2000. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk PREPARED BY: City of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee,MN 55379 a. • lD 5 '. N 4. _ O n N ' —1,.1-- to N �� �yy M I lL � C; 4 . NN�w o Q -)Tm u Tr is r) nw _•- Z WOW 0 o 1 4: v - g 1.---.2.-1- . ; i.; 1„., ,,,, . 0, i .., 1. , H OM Q -41 i .. . 1 1!mai id: Oa ki; • ;1. . g soB Y:, FF p �Q 4 clskii `.`` c 8 T. o in j, c. r1 .. i • ` - -- . a ri Z O O , W W 1— Z • . O L O $� F— v o--NDIS NOUd (n - W I .°caw & m m lai 10 iilli:11 1 liltlt I— m122 \' 3NN0 EMerr 21 9Y 01/04/00 15:54 FAX 12625025522 CONTINENTAL PROPERTIES 10001/001 /5, ,3, ), CONTINENTAL PROPERTIES COM PANY. 1 NC. January 4,2000 Mark McNeil, City Administrator City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee,MN 55379 RE: Kmart Shakopee,MN Dear Mark: This letter is written to provide assurance to you that I will diligently pursue the cooperation and coordination with the Condo Owners Association located directly west of the Kmart. Due to the Holidays, communication has been difficult. In fact, Dave Benson left for Florida on December 22, 1999 (the day after his comments to the Council). It is my intention to communicate and coordinate with Jack Shindler,the association president. I have spoke with Mr. Shindler on previous occasions an am disappointed that he was not in attendance at the December 21, 1999 meeting. There are various options available to satisfactorily resolve this matter. It is my intention to do so. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you should need anything further. Sincerely: CONTINENTAL PROPERTIES COMPANY, INC. Thomas E. Byland Development Director • W 133 NS569 Executive Parkway,P.O.Boz 220•Menomonee Falls,WI 53052•'Telephone 262.502.5500•Fax 262.502.5522 • ss 8, z •N TwpLse CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mark McNeill, City Administrator CC. Shakopee Department Head Group FROM: R Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: AMCON CUP DATE: • January 3, 2000 INTRODUCTION: The attached information has been forwarded to the staff relative to air pollution issues for the proposed use. It is being provided to the Council so that they may review it before the regular meeting tomorrow evening, and be prepared with any questions they may have. In discussions with the attorney for Precision, it has been made clear that there are no federal or state permits required,but that Scott County Environmental Health would inspect the facility annually. Thus,the resolution could be amended to require compliance with conditions imposed as the result of those inspections. ACTION REQUESTED: There is no specific action requested at this time. The information is being provided for use at tomorrow evening's meeting. William J. Platto Attorney at Law Tel:(612)448-2005 218 Pine Street, P.O. Box 257 Fax: (612)448-4029 Chaska, Minnesota 55318 January 3, 2000 VIA FACSIMILE: 445-6718 Mr. Michael Leek Director of Planning City of Shakopee Shakopee City Hall Shakopee,MN 55379 Re: Application for Conditional Use Permit for Precision Auto Collision Center (PC-99-130) Dear Mr. Leek: Pursuant to your request, I am enclosing herewith the 27 page report received from the Environmental Lab at PPG Industries(Pittsburgh Paint and Glass). The report documents the lack of emission problems from the paint supplies utilized by the proposed owner. There are no permits required by the EPA or MPCA for a business such as this until 25,000 lbs.of materials per year are used. Precision Auto uses less than 3,000 lbs. per year. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, C40/ William J. Platto WJP:k , Enclosures cc: Jeffrey Thomas Joe Ryan ZO'd dLE: O 00-£O-Ler Table 5.2-7(Metric Arid English Units). EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS FROM GASOLINE SERVICE STATION OPERATIONS' Emission Rate rng/L Emission Source Throughput lb/103 gal Throughput Filling underground tank(Stage I) Submerged filling 880 7.3 splash filling 1,380 11.5 Balanced submerged filling 40 0.3 Underground tank breathing and emptyingb 120 1.0 Vehicle refueling operations(Stage II) Displacement losses(uncontrolled) 1,320 11.0 Displacement losses(controlled) 132 1.I Spillage 80 0.7 a Factors are for VOC as well as total organic emissions,because of the methane and ethane content of gasoline evaporative emissions Is negligible. b Includes any vapor lose between underground tank and gas pump. Based on Equation 6,using average conditions. A second source of vapor. emissions from service stations is underground tank breathing. Breathing losses occur daily and are attributable to gasoline evaporation and barometric pressure changes. The frequency with which gasoline is withdrawn from the tank,allowing fresh air to enter to enhance evaporation,also has.a major effect on the quantity of these emissions. An average breathing emission rate is 120 ntg/L(1.0 11,']000 gal)of throughput. 5-2.2.3 Motor Vehicle Refueling- Service station vehicle refueling activity also produces evaporative emissions. Vehicle refueling emissions come from vapors displaced from the automobile tank by dispensed gasoline and from spillage. The quantity of displaced vapors depends on gasoline temperature,auto tank temperature,gasoline RVP, and dispensing rate. Equation 6 can be used to estimate uncontrolled displacement losses from vehicle refueling for a particular set of conditions.13 e 264.2 ((-5.909) - 0.0949 ( T) r 0.0884 (ID) 0.485 (RVF (6) where: EA =refueling emissions,mg/L -T =difference between temperature of fuel in vehicle tank and temperature of dispensed fuel, °F TD =temperature of disyensed fuel, °F RVP=Reid vapor pressure,psia Note that this equation and the spillage loss factor are incorporated into the MOBILE model The MOBILE model allows for disabling of this calculation if it is desired to include these emissions in the stationer, 1/95 Petroleum Industry 5.2-15 dOO:EO 00-EO-wee 90'd 12/21,99 17:13 FAX 6128920_4 r1r'nua nu i'v Rvr.tivur� rc+3t--`~ 12/21/1999 15:13 614-362 33:' i area source portion of an inventory rather than in the mobile source portion. It is estimated that the uncontrolled emissions from vapors displaced during vehicle refueling avenge 1320 tng/L(11.0 lb/1000 gal)of dispensed gasoline.'•12 Spillage loss is made up of contributions from prefill and postfill nozzle drip and from spit-back and overflow from the vehicles`s Fuel tank filler pipe during filling. The amount of spillage lots can depend on several variables, including service station business chazactetisttes,tank configuration.5 2 operator techniques. An average spillage loss is 80 mg/1.(0.7 Ib/1000 gal)of dispensed gasoline. Control methods for vehicle refueling emissions are based on conveying the vapors displaced from the vehicle fuel tank to the underground storage tank vapor space through the use of a special hose and nozzle,as depicted in Figure 5.2-7(termed Stage II vapor control). In"balance"vapor control systems,the vapors are conveyed.by natural pressure differentials established during refueling. In "vacuum assist"systems,the conveyance of vapors from the auto fuel tank to the underground storage tank is assisted by a vacuum pump. Testa on a few systems have Indicated overall systems control efficiencies in the range of 88 to 92 percents.12 When inventorying these emissions as an area source, rule penetration and rule effectiveness should also be taken into account. Procedures For Emission Inventory Preparation, Volume IV: Mobile Sources,EPA•450/4-111-026d,provides more detail on this. SERY4Ci 9T�PotaPi11O5I RETUANEG'IAP0R5 DISPENSED iiA.sQt.I1E • Id YAPOflS •MOLINE Figure 5.2.7, Automobile refueling vapor recovery system. References For Section 5.2 • 1. C.B.Burklin and R.L. lianercanip,Revision Of Evaporative Hydrocarbon Emission Factors, EFA-450/3-76-039.U. S.Environmental Protection Agency,Research Triangle Park,NC,August 1976. 3. G.A.LaFlam,et aL,Revision Of Tank Track Loading Hydrocarbon Emission Factors,Pacific Environmental Services, Inc.,Durham,NC,May 1982. 3. G.A.LaFlam,Revision Of Marine Vessel Evaporative Emission Factors,Pacific Environmental Services,inc.,Durham, NC,November 1964. 4. Evaporation Loss From Tank Cars, Tank?rucks And Marine Vessels,Bulletin No.2514. 5.2-16 EMISSION FACTORS 1/95 zo•d d£o: o oo-Co-uvO 1 V t iyy li D -A O1"pyLu:91 at1.nv� a 4 1 b_ `�0 12 1999 1 :13 E;14-362-br • GPIrllltUitN 1 kL American petrela.ttu Institute.Washington.DC.1959. 5. C.E.Burklin,er al.,A Study Of Vapor Control Methods For Gasoline Marketing erearch asionngle Park, EPA-450/3-75-046A and-046B,U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, NC,'May 1975. 6. Bulk Gasoline Terminals-Background Information For Proposed Standards. EPA-450/3-80-038a,U.S.Environmental Protcction Agency,Research Triangle Park,NC, December 1980. 7. AnnasphertC Hydrocarbon Emissions From Marine Vessel Transfer Operations, Publication 2514A.American Petroleum Institute,Washington,DC,1981. 8. C.E.Burklin,et al.,Background information On Hydrocarbon Emissions From Marine Terminal Operarions,EPA-450/3.16-0384 and-038b,U.S.Environmental Protection Agency,Research Triangle Park,NC,November 1976. 9. Rules For The Protection Of The Marine EnvironmentRelating To Tank Vessels Carrying Oil In Bulk,45 FR 43105, June 30, 1980. 10. R.A.Nichola,Analytical Calculation Of Fuel Transit Breathing Loss,Chevron USA,Inc., San Francisco,CA,March 21, 1977. 11. R.A.Nichols,Tank Truc k Leakage Measurements,Chevron USA,Inc.,San Francisco. CA.June 7,1977. 12. Investigation Of Passenger Car Refueling Losses: Final Report,2nd Year Program,APTD-1453, U.S.Environmental Protection Agency,Research Triangle Park,NC,September 1972. 13. Refitting Emissions From Uncontrolled Vehicles,EPA-AA-SDSB-85-6,U.S.Environmental Protection Agency,Ann Arbor,MI,June 1985. • 1/95 Petroleum Industry 5.2-17 Eo-d dEo:Co 00-Eo-UEc • 12/21'1'359 15:13 614-:11:1-Ejt EW117-..n•N"ui'A' 4. mom-ems ems 141111141110 PPG Industries Ohio, inc. 7t.O Pittsburgh Drive, Delaware, OH 43013 740-363 -3610 • Facsimile Cover Sheet • • To: Jeffrey Thomas From; Tonya Myers Company: Precision Auto Collision Company: PPG Industries Ohio, Inc. Phone: 612-445-8500 Phone: (740) 368-7408 Fax: 612-445-8414 Fax: (740) 362-6837 Date: 12121/1999 Total # of pages, including cover: 25 Message: Hopefully this meets your requirements. Tonya THIS TRANSMITTAL IS CONFIDENTIAL AND IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE ADDRESSEE. IF YOU ARE NOT THE ADDRESSEE,ANY DISCLOSURie OR USE OF THIS INFORMATION BY YOU IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. CO'd dLE: ZO 00-CO-uEC —' L1/:lil�'jY iE:I� bi4--;61-bt7�7—`• � k01hfVOIe.rviwt. -- . e • Precision Auto Collision Amount of Product Product used an VOC of Product Poundof ods0 VO by 1pB x rayed OC) used on ave.repair average repairA.2 0.0656 2 oz DP5OLF oz.. DP402LF 5.2 0.0406 10 1 eDRC Color Basecoat 5.91 0.4617 20 oz. DT860 Reiyucer 6,56 1,025 15 oz. DCU2021 Clear 4.02 0.471 2 oz. DCX81 Hardener 1.44 0.0225 4 oz. DT870 Reducer _ 6.91 0,2159 54 oz.Total 2.3023 Total pounds sprayed per car per day=270 oz sprayed per day 5 cars sprayed par day 54r 2,11 X 5 carsp 11.51 pounds VOC sprayed per day or gallons sprayed total The concentration of all volatile constituents at 300 feet was calculated to be 41.08 ug/m3. (41 parts per billion) 1 part per billion is equivalent to 1 minute In 32 years. f part per billion is equivalent to 7 peanut M&M out of 2 million pounds of regular M&M'e. cm \'\\ ( vv:) 40 •k\-1-\ C1�c\ xa ss ' `'J dL£=ZO 00-E0-u'C 170'd +** SCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES **' *** TERRAIN HEIGHT OF 0 . M ABOVE STACK BASE USED DIST CONIC MOM USTK MIX H. F (M) (UG/M"'*3) STAG (M/S) (M/S) (M) 'HT 91. 41.08 2 3.0 3.0 960.0 1 100. 91.11 3 5.0 5.0 1600.0 200. 44 .50 5 5,0 5.0 10000. 0 1 300. 31.81 6 4.0 4.0 10000.0 1 400. 38.99 6 4.0 4.0 10000.0 1 500. '36.33 6 4.0 4.0 10000.0 1 600. 35.75 5 1.0 1.0 10000.0 2 700_ 35.26 S 1.0 1.0 10000..0 800. 33.84 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 2_._. _ . . 900. 35.20 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 22.26 30.98 13.47 00 1000. 35.56 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 22.28 34.07 14.41 00 1100. 35.05 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 22.2B 37.14 15.25 00 1200. 34.18 1.0 1.0 10000.0 22.28 40.17 16.06 :5C 1300. 33.10 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 22.28 43.19 16.86 02 1400. 31.90 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 22.28 46.19 17.63 00 1500. 30. 65 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 22.28 49.16 18.38 00 MAXIMUM 1-HR CONCENTRATIOE AT OR BEYOND 91. M: 144 . 14.79 5.0 5.0 10000.0 11.08 10.82 7.13 DC • TOO 30tid SflO I f1321d WONd 3f1N 11NOD i m •'• ��;•`.. ..•k Yi�'... ijC. ..... 1{. -41§t�7M•i' ."n Fro : Corcoran.,Michael Sent: Monday. December 20. 1999 3:07 PM To: Myers,Tanya Subject: emission modeling results Tonya, Attached is the output file from the EPA Screen3 Emission Modeling Software. The model was run using the following inputs. 1.Emissions are from a single stack. 2. Stack height= 32 feet 3. Stack Diameter=34 inches 4. Stack Velocity= 2037 fee`/minute 5. Building width= 126 feet 6. Building length=245 feet 7. Building height=22 feet 8. Exhaust temperature = ambient=68 F 9. Distance to fertceline = 3G0 feet The results from Screen3 are very conservative. If the model predicts concentrations that are t00 high there are more refined models available from EPA that can be used(alis would require the use of a consultant). The concentrations shown in the results are one-hour average concentrations. Also, the model runs using a variety of weather conditions end wind speeds to determine the worst case concentration. The model showed a maxim lm 1-hour concentration of 44.79 ug/m3(micrograms per meter cubed)occurred at 184 meters (604 feet). The concentration at 300 feet was calculated to be 41.08 ug/m3. `Please call if you have any questions_ Mike 6ODYStiOP.doc - .):10 ---c:DC`yR-- c- C c- r�z. • C\CV tC d8£=ZO 00-£0-war SO-d 11A0AVO DU14rJ\1Lt.0 o 12/2111999 15'13 624-362-6837 ENVIROt✓METJ7.^.t Pad 23 , r • s17, 7 . , • From: Frey.Ery Sent Friday, December 17, 1999 2:44 PM To: Myers.Tonya Subject: AP-42 Emission Factors Mike and I looked at some AP-42 VOC emission factors for various sources. Here are a few that we found that may be of interest to you. Dry cleaner-Average 1 ton/year Commercial and Consumer us,ars-9.2 Ib./yr./capita Gas stations-welt controlled-3.1 Ib./1000 gals. pumped -not well controlled 19 IbJi000 gals.pumped If you have access to AP-42 information,there are many other emissions factors available there. ext. 5557 • • VO'd d6S : ZO 00-£0-wer 12/21,18 16:13 614-362-6837 ENVIRONMENTt1_ PAGE 0 22 • a�. v! 11.• •yS,l �I.A�,Y { M�••moi r��j�i�-�jYg r. . , ., ...', ;.L`' .�'/tiF�::.::..'.'1' •,�r"��.��i+.°,.��i rt_, yr ��?.i',�i ;':k} .� s r� From- Corcoran,Michael Sent: Tuesday. December 21. 1999 7:49 AM To: Myers.Tonya Subject: FIN:AP-42 documents • From: Corcoran.Michael • Sent Monday,December 20.1999 9:00 AM To: Myers,Tonya Subject AP.42 documsnn. Tonya, Here are the AP-42 documents that provide emission factors for other sources. Hopefully you won't have any problems opening them_ The official name of the document that these sections were pulled from is: Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors A2-42,Fifth Edition,Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sources 1't R a C4510.PDF Typical Commercial/Consumer solvent use- !G�rt C4S01.P DF Dry Cleaners FBF' CO5S02.PDF Gasoline Service Stations (Table 5.2-7, page 15) Please tell me if there is anything else that I can do. Mike • SOd dOO:Et) OO-£O --' C' ' 12/L1 OO 1f .uf rtes ul.00cvc:� nAvnva uWwa.ir.a.a. VA...... 12/21/1999 15:13 614-362-6037 ENVIRONMENTAL Patti 08 . 12 PPG Industries, Inc. Environmental Data Sheet Friday,December 17, 1999 - PRODUCT': OLF LOW VOGREY EPDXY PRIMER �,...? REGULATORY INFORMATION BASED ON 1 GALLONS SUPPLIED: M LIQ° km, MS ValiLOA 100.41-4 ETNYL BENN IE ' .13 .Cb Yes Yes 1011-10-1 N11N11 I1105U71L klTONE .64 .29 rat Yee 106-16-1 TOLUENE .40 .22 rad Yet 1330-20-7 XYLENU .37 .17 Tao Yes 95-43-6 1.2.4.11100011 pE11LPME .23 .1 No Yea aeras+. GLYCOL ETNE1.S .52 .2L Yea Yes sada.. ZINC C0N90unoe 1. .45 no Yes *strait* 21NC 10 ZINC LC111'a1NOS .43 .z 110 TOt DISCLAIMER This LnvIroamultil Data Sheet is ret intended to replace the product's Material Safety Data Sheet. The data esahiued in OM ERlrlroameatal Data Skeet is based on Information provided to PPG by its suppliers and PPG',knowledge tsf:P?G pr'oductforesuletiaac. PPG mow no representation or warranty regarding the accuracy or shit iotormadoa or that the Information or data will not cheep. The inforsnetioa provided In this Environmental Data Sheet Is sot Inisaded es and dem not crepe keel rights or obhpdsse. This information is provided for the sole use of PPG euuOinere and to hot fir dieeteaere to compositors of PPG. PPG cestomer;have as ledepeedent eblIgaLSoa to detersine prepay us.of the Adenoid=and that their use of the iafermitiat le cenditalt with&dull,state and local laws,roles and regr4tiene. Trace eonetlturata present at levels lett than 0.1%by weight are not Included In the Regulatory I.(o►miUoe section of this Zmiroaa.ntat Data Sheet. Trow'Weide present at lerels ims sh=e 0.1'Y6 by weight ars Not Included 1.the S.iv.na 9.etien of the EnvlrenasestDsta Sheet. • atomics'composed.generated as a result of the tering preens of shit meting ere net Inelad.d on Wit Eaviroameatal Data Sheet 90'd dStt:ZO 00-EO-uve 12/21/99 11:07 FAX 8128920241 ,IR�NhiFJ��� rl2/'�1g9� 1 :13 614-�1��6637 J II PPG Industries, Inc. Environmental Data Sheet Friday,December 17, 1999 w Cuatom.r: Tonga Myers Quante plant PRODUCT; a P402LF LOW VOC I AMIXST PRODUCT wawa,CBARA TICS: weighUoe►Uou Product: 7.75 )bei>i Density of Organic saivcnt Blemd, 1.11 1b21ga1 WeIrh YAMS 32.80 Non Volatiia: % 27.31%• VoMile: 67.20'4 'T2.49 /o yi Wider; 00°% .00% VOC INFORMATION: VOC pot Gallon(calculated)lees water: 5.20 lbs/gal 622.9 ea VOC per gallon(calculated)with water. 120 lbs/gal 622.9 g/1Tr VOC per gallon of Solids: 18.9 lbs/gsI 2264. g/itr VOC pef pound of Solids; 2.05 Mb Pound of HAPS per Pound of Solidi t .480 PERCENT 01'TOTAL FORMULA: SOLVENT COMPOSITION: CAWNW Ynlum SE! Aeaoesldoa 32.80 �.4c 107-%-2 PAOFTLEAt GLYCOL MONOMCTHYL _10ER 13.44 .80 7il-93.1 MlTMYI ETHYL UTONE S.45 5.52 (10.43-0 NETm (M-MYL) OcTOve $.27 640 71-36.3 N-IUTYt. ALCOHOL $.13 0.50 67-67-0 ISOPA0PYL ALCOHOL 2.83 3.5 01 68230-35,7 . 030-8101.-ACETATE 2.8 - 2.05 ,o&.ea-3 TOWING 99 1.21 aA7a2-.8-9 80878A ..9O .01 1569-674 P6CPYLENE GLYCOL METHYL ITMER d917: E0 00-£O-u E' LO'd • 11 PPG Industries, Inc. • Environmental Data Sheet Friday,Dec.mber 11, 1999 Customer. Tony/Myers Delaware plant PR DUCT:DBCSOO COLOR BLENDER PRODUCT PHYSICAL CH RACTERISTICSt Wmght/OaUon Product: 7.71 lbs/sal Deoelty of Organic Solvent E1eltd: 1.30 siva Wsla�; yot'u oe Non-Volatile: 23.24% 18.94 • Yolatlle; 76.7o'r. - al.06 9.6 %wrec: .00% .00% vac><sw>F'oPa•t..mor: r:,e., a,.ili.i(talaulal+d)int water 5 91 IhA 11 700A W1II VOC per gallon(otdnttletsd)with water. 5.91 /gel 1.Mir VOC per gam of Solids: 331.2 1b/ el 30 eltr VOC per potted of Solids: Pound of AAPS per Pound of Solids: .543 SOLVENT COMPOSITION: PERCENT OF TOTAL FORMULA' raca�FI`nw�+atllnn Ht<W�ht LaNdIESI 12/21/99 17:08AX 6128920241 BINXOS BURl`1SV'ILL_E 12/21/1999 15:13 614-362-5837 FJWIRCNMEhtTAI. PAa T_ T O �3Jdd Sf10 I A d Wald 3f1N UNDO --=---- 12/21/1999 15:13 614-362-6337 EN 1Kunmert i►Y• TiaPPG Industries, Inc. Friday,Dumber 17, 1999 tnyiroumenwtl Data Sheet PRO I UCTI DP402LF LOW VOC DP CATALYST . PIGVLATOItY DalORMATION BASED ON 1 GALLONS SU?PLD!DI fil al WIA.4114nTee TM.00 Na Yee 71--61-3 T-RItTl.E .4 . tea Yea 71.36.3 Nn1.0401.,n1.0401., 10 1.04 .10 70-0-3 WM. EMU KETCH DISCLAIMER This Diviroenoatal Data Skeet U act intended to replete the product',Material Sfety n ieforotatiOn ided is is G by its The data tootaisod in this edge Environmental product Dt81 Sheet PPG tubes„ptenotatlon of yarraah seppitcre sod PPG',ttae of of,iU 0 vcgudtag do enemy of this lamrseatioa or that the yNonostiaa or ash Mit net change. set to The lofbrnutlen provided lo this Environmental odDM o a Sheet arm intended edto aed s d a for matosa el rights co petitlrs PGhis is PG meat'is o b� endsos obligation to determine proper uta arta! competitors of PPG. PPG suttetner s have se UdeP get sum and local laws,rub sad iof.nostioo sod that theft nts of Ship isforenedon is consisting with federal,sfa tegetenous. Trace constituents present at ievelt Mess Ursa 0.1%by weight are not Winded 1a the Rettttstory information section of this EoviroI,atatsl Data Sheet. Trees solvents prams silents less due 0.1%by welsht are notlnetudsd it the Solvents Sutton of the Eavir4aweet Dela Sheet- Centies1 soapoSmda generated ase result of the coring proem elthb costing are not indoded an this Zovlrooaebtel Data Sheet. 80'd d9b= 30 00-£O-uEC 12/21/1959 I5:13 514-362-5$37 gaJV1hfUN�r_14 AL 5020 • I PPG Industries, Inc. Environments!Data Sheet Friday,December 17,1999 Customer Tony*Myers Wotan Mat PRornl r; DT870 AUCER • PRODUCT PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS; Weight/131113n Product 6.91 lbs/gal Density of Organic Solvent H4xd: 6.91 lb3/gel Volume Non-Volatile: .00% .00%s Volatile: 100.00% 100.00% %Want: .00% .00% VOC INFORMATION: VOC per gallon(calculabod)ass water. 6.91 lbe/gal 127.11 g,lu VOC pee pa=(calculated)with water: 6.91 ibs/gal 527.E g/Itr VOC per gallon of Solids: 0 lbs/gal .00g/ltr VOC per pound of Solids: .00 lb/lb SOLVENT COM OSMON: PZIUMNI'T OF TOTAL FORMULA: CASH CamnosttUnr $Y„Wsjgi[ Itv Volume 75.034 meTATL ETMYL KE1OJE 32.41 33.0 104.65.6 1•METYOXY-a4g rL ACETATE 22.41 19.20 105.84.3 TOLUEME 19.00 15.21 5012.32-4 V.M. AND P. EAPMTMA 16.56 18.19 6474249-8 MANTRA 3.16 3.56 108.67-2 ME TNYLCYCLCNEYAltE 3.15 3.55 1A2.52.5 N-NEPTANE 3.1S 3.55 711657-10-4 2•METMOD(Y•1•P1t01'Yt ACETATE .11 .09 ZO'd d6S : ZO 00-£0-uEC` • 12/21/99 17:10 FAX 611$920241 ni:•nuJ Dv+u.J. PAGE 29 12/21/1999 15:13 614-362-683' F.NSIRON`1ENTHL 1 W PPG Industries, Inc. Envlronmentat Data Sheet Friday,December 17, 1999 PRODU DT8?0 R'a` F.DUCER REGULATORY INFORMATION BASED ON 1 GALLONS SUPPLIEDt CAe Csiti4oggpaIgnKGS S R 101.61-3 TOLUENE 1.31 6 Yee tee 76.93.3 NETWYL ETHYL KFTGWE 2.24 1.02 Yes Yes DISCLAIMER ?his Savtrsrtmentai Data Shoot la eat intended to mimeo she products Matsriai/.My Dole Sheet • The data restatnad la shim Am ino:motel Data Sheet is based ea informatics provided to PPG by its suppliers end P?C'e knowledge otl!'PG predict formulations. PPG mates is repr.eatatOoN or warrents reprdiog toe ancerser of t is lnfermattete or that tie lafertnetion or dela will not chases. The inform dam prevlded In{Lie Sevlrenmentai Dare Sheet L stet lntwsded to end does net create Ingot rights sr obllptions. This informable is provided for tt»sols we of PPG c .tamers sod is set for dh ctolq#to eempettsrs.1 PPG. PPG euatemers hays on independent oblillitlon to dettrlaitx proper ase of the ietermetlee nod that their use of the information le coesiltent with{edited,state end keel laws,rules and reptatnt's. Trace constituent'pregast at levels Ian thea Q.)%by weight are sat induded le the Relalstsry Intsamatoa eeetlon of thea£aviren,sental Data Sheet. Tram serener present at levels lest'Man 0.1%by weight are not Iocluded le the Solvents Section of the asvireantent Data Sheet. Chemical co.pouads•peereted ase result of the crrlsg prongs of this casting are not saddsded en this Esvironstenesi Dam Shoot. £O'd d6S : ZO 00—£0—uEr avAoo 12/21/98 17:UJ IAA 8122i112U241 ntonua ENVIRONMENTAL PAGE 04 12/21/195 15:13 614-362-685. 12/20/95 14:42:07 *x* SCREEN3r MODEL RUN *`* *** VERSION DATED 96043 *** PRECISION AUTO COLLISION ** 91.44 • SIMPLE TERRAIN- INPUTS: ' SOURCE TYPE = POINT EMISSION RATE (G/S) = .181437 STACK HEIGHT (M) = 9.1536 STK INSIDE DIAM (M) = .8636 STK EXIT VELOCITY (M/S)- 10.3460 STK GAS EXIT TEMP ( ) = 293.1500 AMBIENT AIR TEMP (K) a 295.0000 RECEPTOR HEIGHT (M) .0000 CBA'/RURAL OPTION = RURAL Br.ILDING HEIGHT (M) 6.7056 MIN HORIZ BLDG DIM (M) _+ 38.4048 MAX HORIE BLCG D!H (M) = 74.6760 THE REGULATORY (DEFAULT) MIXING HEIGHT OPTION WAS SELECTED. THE REGULATORY (DEFAULT) ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OF 10.0 METERS WAS ENTERED. 800Y. FLUX a .0_0 M**4/S**3; MOM. FLUX - 19.955 M'**4/S'*2. :rx FULL METEOROLOGY *; *. ---#4.<2."., *** SCREEM AUTOMATED DISTANCES *** _.0n9 C ...******....*..************40*w*ir *** TERRAIN HEIGHT OF 0. M ABOVE STACK BASE USED DIST CONC U1OM USTK MIX H: P (M) (UG/M**3) STAB (M/S) (M/S) (M) 'HI .--7- 1:)(::6:S=A„-- 91. 41.08 2 3.0 3.0 960.0 1 100. 41.11 3 5.0 5.0 1600.0 1 200. 44 .50 5 5,0 5.0 10000.0 1 300, 37.81 6 4 .0 4.0 10000.0 1 400. 38.99 • 6 4.0 4 .0 10000.0 1 • 500. '36.33 6 4.0 4.0 10000.0 1 600. 35.75 5 1.0 1.0 10000.0 2 700. 35.26 S 1.0 1.0 10000.0 2 800. 33.84 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 2_._. _ . . 900. 35.20 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 22.26 30.98 13.47 0.0 1000. 35.56 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 22.28 34.07 14.41 00 1100. 35.05 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 22.28 37.14 15.25 CO 1200. 34.18 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 22.28 40.17 16.06 :G 1300. 33.10 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 22.28 43.19 16.86 02 1400. 31. 90 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 22.28 46.19 17.63 00 1500. 30.65 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 22.28 49.16 18.38 CO MAXIMUM! 1-HR CONCENTRATICV AT OR BEYOND 91. fi: 184. 44.79 5 5.0 5.0 10000.0 11.08 10.82 7.13 CC ZO'd d1747: ZO 00-£0-uEC '1Z/Z1/1010 I f:04 rest OLLOWAVL41 nai.nuo vu .a.a• rr�'+�-•••u., z�zr7rsss-� r5=3--- 6Td=.:6L 68: --� 7 t"vvlrurit�tritr:�. DWA$H= MEANS NO CALC MADE (CONC = 0.01 DWASHA.NO MEANS NO BUILDING DOWNWASH USED AWASH=HS MEANS HUBER-SNNYDER DONNNASH USED pc(ASH=SS MEANS SCHCLMAN•-SCIRE DOWNWASH USED \. OWASR=NA MEANS DOWNWASH NOT APPLICABLE, X<34LB ax* SCREEN DISCRETE DISTANCES 4-1 1*+ *4* TERRAIN HEIGHT OF 0. M ABOVE STACK BASS USED FOR FOLLOWING DISTANCES *r+ DIST CONC U1CM USTK MIX HT PLUME SIGMA SIGMA (M) (U0/M**3) STA3 (M/S) (M/S) (M) HT (M) Y (M) Z ;M) GNASH ---^ 3.0 3.0 960.0 13.76 17.76 S.76 03 91. 41.4 4 183. 44 .79 5 5.0 5.0 10000.0 11.08 10.70 7-OB 00 274. 39.39 5 4.5 4.5 10000.0 11.62 15. 56 8.85 CO 366. 39.23 6 4.0 4.0 10000.0 12.41 13.49 7.87 CO DWASH= MEANS NO CALC MADE (COt-IC _ 0.0) DWASH=1.10 MEANS NO BUILDING DOWNWAS}t USED AWASH=HS MEANS HUBER-SN'YDER DOWNWASH USED DWASH=SS MEANS SCHULMPII-8CIRE DOWNWASa USED DWASH-NA MEANS DOWNWASH NOT APPLICABLE, X<3*LB *'** REGULATORY (Default) a** PERI'ORMING CAVITY CALCULATIONS WITH ORIGINAL SCREEN CAVITY MODEL (BRODE, 1996) .,* ****a** • *** CAVITY CALCULATION - 1 *** *** CAVITY CALCULATION - 2 **- CONC (UG/M**3) _ .0000 CONC (UG/M**3) = . 0000 CRIT PIS 910M (MIS) = 99.99 CRIT WS 110M (M/S) - 99.9999.99 CRIT WS 0 HS (M/S) = 99.99 CRIT wS 0 HS (M/S) DILUTION WS (MIS) - 99.99 DILUTION WS (M/S) = 99.99 6.71 CAVITY HT (M) 06.71 CAVITY HT (M} a CAVITY LENGTH (M) r 34 ,53 CAVITY LENGTH (N) = 27.642 .64 ALONGWIND DIM (M) 38.40 ALONGWIND DIM (M) CAVITY CONC NOT CALCULATED FOR CRIT WS > 20.0 M/S. CONC SET = 0.0 END OF CAVITY CALCULATIONS *** SUMMARY OF SCREEN MODEL RESULTS *** CALCULATION MAX CONC DIST TO TERRAIN PROCEDURE (CG/t9**3) MAX (M) HT (M) £O'd dSV:ZO 00-£0-uer 6228420241 KIN Ku U a ZFtOh ENTAL _ •12'21.99 17:o4 pa 12121/1' 9 1S:l:y s%4.-362-6637 SIMPLE TERRAIN 44.19 104, 0. *,;RY******.`** **t*.i**********, * t*** *'* REMEMBER TO INCLUDE BACZGROON0 CONCENTRATIONS " • 17O'd dStr: ZO 00-£0-wee '12/21/99 17:07 1.A1 isiZeUXUL41nAl,SVU.s YV•Y..I........ PAGE a? 12/2111993 15:13 S14-362-6637 ENVIRON h1ENTAL , • 12PPG Industries, Inc. Environmental Data Sheet Friday,December 17,1999 Ci ato *'; Tony*Myers 0Oawan ptt'tt PRODUCT: D SOLF LOW VOC GREY EPDXY PRODUCT PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS; WoVatlOalloa Prodncr. 11.49 1ba/gal . Pesky of Organic Solvent Blond: 7.03 lb3lgai.1S Volume No»_Volitilo: 62,63% 38.95 vclatilc: 39.37% 61.05 %Water: .00% .00% VOC INFVRMATION: VOC per gallon(calculated)less water: 4.29 lbs/SI 513.9 6/lu' VOC per gallon(calculated)with water: 4.29 gal 5117'. g/!tr VOC per gaol of Solids: 1. lb/lblbal VOC per pound of Solids: . Pound of HAPS per Pound of Solid,: 291 SOLVENT COMPOSITION: P11rACZNT OF TOTAL FORMULA: CAM CQ$llsli>i ��W tpayshim 110-43-0 I44TMCs IN 11.55 21.20 E 1 -AMYL) KETONE 5.5 .20 106-10-1 METHYL 110 UTVL (E706E 9.50 1 111_75-2 1-110102Y ETHANOL 1.5 4 1,51 6 g9 ton-aa-3 mune 3.97 6.14 6674244,6 ARO1A116 NAPNTOIA 3.21 5.51 L U t330-20-7 XLL Ei 3.00 3.15 URINE93-63-6 1,t.4.711PITNYNZFNE 1. 0 3.15 100-41-4 ETN% URINE 90'd dgb: ZO 00-£O-uEC 12/21/99 17:03 tAA1 61:88zuz.11 it 'iV* avuu•.2•++.+-s.— Nqj��' 11 614-36 12/21/1999 15:1 2-6837 ENVIRONMENTAL • , Id PPG Industries,Inc. ' - TnYironmcntal Data Sheet Friday,December 11, 1999 customer Tanya Myers DeUam plant PAODUC?: IIBCSOU COLOR BLU D R _ __....1 PRODUCT PHVSICAL CHARACTERISTICS: Weight/Gallon Product 7.71 ibslgal Density of Organic Solvent Blend; 7.30 lbs/gal 14,44i =Qs: • Naa-Volatfle: 23 24% 18.94% • Volatile: 76.1(.% 81.06% %Water. .0t% .00% VOC INFORMATION: VOC per gallon(calculated)labs water: 5.91 lb,✓gel 708.0 gilt VOC per gallon(oalaulatod)with water: 5.911bi/gal 701.0 gar VOC per Oleo of Solids: 31.21bslgal 3737. g/ttr VOC par pond of Solids: 3.30 lb/lb Pound of NAPS per Pound of Solids: .543 SOLVENT COMPOSITION: PERCENT OF TOTAL FORMULA' C i1 ___alai 123-66.4 11-UUTYt ACETA?! 63.67 47.14 1 9.751 50.20.7 XYLENES 0.9.11 19.25 71-36-3 6-MUtri WOOLcos . .91 02 106-6S•6 1•ME111011•1-PA0P1"L ACETATE 7 7 100-41-4 Inn 11/112/911 7.62 Z5I1 .91 1.0! io3-M-3 tOLUIIIE .92 .91 112-07-2 2-3J1'OXTETRYt. ACCTATt • ZO'd dZS : ZO 00-£0-uvr • Environmental Data Sheet Friday,December 17, 1999 PRODUCT: DBC500 COL R BLENDER PICGIILATORY INFORMATION BASED ON 1 GALLONS SUPPLIED; Gait Com /at NO li6JUI• 7O� 100-41-4 ETNOt, elN2tME .12 .06 Too Tai .03 Too Tea tel-4e-3 Totuom ..O0 .127 ten Yes 1333-20-T xTtsOfi .69 .31 No 'os gambit* QlScoi. TH U .07 .01 Tea Yea DISCLAIMER Tbit Environmental Doh Shat le cat Intended to replete the prodact'a Material Safely Data Sheet The data eentaia d In Ibis ltnvlrofinental Data Sheet is based on taformadof provided to PPG by its $Yppuars and PPG`'ksea4ed*e of PIG product formulattono. ?PG Mauna no reproseatatiss or warranty rglar illg tete aeenraey of this information or that the information or data will cot change. The latbraeation provided la this Environmental Dab Sheet is sot intended to and doss sot Mealy legal righ% or obtlp'tee.. This information as poevided for the sole ase of PPG cottnntars sad is set for disclosure to essspedtars efPPG. PPG manner,bane as Independent obligattes to determine proper sae of the i■f.rtsaens cad that their see of the information is consistent tit*federal.*sae and last 1a'r.>nM and regale anat. • Trace tasltitunte*resent at levels leas thin 0.1% by'Right an not lndaded h to Ragalatory Iafennadon section of this Ynrtreamsetal Dais Eissat. Trees wheat.pretest at levels lets Ilan 0.1%by weight ire not included le lb.slsivaats section of the Environment Data Sheet. Chemical eongeunda generated as s.'result of the curing process Of this coating are oat included on this Environmental Dab Shore £O'd d£S = ZO 00—£0—UEC 1L/L1AV 1/-VD lAA OILOYLV441 a1PaVJ DvAa2.L LL8 r ut 1, 12/21/1399 1399 15:13 614-362-6837 ENIIIRDt 1Eh1TAl- • i PPG Industries, Inc. , . Environmental Data Sheet Friday,December 17, 1999 J Customer: Tony!My t Mtwara Plant . PRODUCT: DTS60 REDUCER PRODUCT PHYSICAL CSAR1"CIBRISTICS: WelghbOalkei Product: 6.56 1bc/Qal Dadsi1Y of Orgaalc Solvent Bland: 6.55 lbs/gal Wigt4 Volume. Nos►Volsttle: .00% .00% Volatile: 100.0 .00%% 100,00% %Water: VOC INFORMATION: VOC per gallon(calculated)less water: 6.56 lbs/gal 785.5 gilts VOC per pike(calculated)with water: g 6.56 hs/ l 785-600�� VOC per gallon of Solids: .00 MbVOC per pound of Solids: 9OLVFNP COMPOSITION.. PEACSNT OF TOTAL FORMULA: OR Co $v Wt Veloma mgositlon l6.o1 45.94 67-64-IALUEha 11.30 19.35 108•5D-a rot. ME fl13.16 16.17 84181•8A-0xm_ •8♦•0 IErEUM D15TILLATE5 10.06 9.07 123-8s-1 W-turn. ICITATE 66742-89-8 !WMA 2.93 9.14 2.93 3.134 108.872 NETMTISONEXAIIE 2.92 3.13 142-62-3 N•NIPTANE VO'd dES : ZO 00-EO-wee 12/21/911 17:int res O1Lonzu.141 1►u•ntra au��at,,._a�aa.a.t. , .+.fit"+- 3 b'1 4-442-t_r4 r Eir111hUPrmtN t HL - PPG Industries, Inc. Environmental Data Sheet Friday,,December 17, 1999 PRODUCT: DTs 0 REDUCtR RIGv xTORY travORMATION BASED ON 1 GALLONS SUPPLE: CeiLV LAI C mtio'IL 1.+< .63 'fee Tn 108-46-3 TOLUENE DISCLAIMER ibIe Environmental Date Skoet la not intended to replace the product's Material Safety Data Dot The data centaioed is this Environmental Data Shod Is based on Mformatioo IDIOM is�by■/tItannty ssppfwrs and PPG's knstitiedge of]'PG product formaalatlens. PPG makes so rep RSardlog the sestina of this tan rmadam or that the information or data will not done. ■d loco eat cream legal rib "the i'termatle■provided In this Einviroemewtai Data Skeet It not Intended to .d sot for r lam lega rights sr ohllpddns. This information is provided for the sots vee of PK aure competitors stTPG. PIG cottomeo bays an ladepan dent obligation to determine _oand local r roles dm !atarmatioa add that their Mid Utile information is coeoismnt wits kderal, ra5ulatione. Trice tsnstltvaatt pasta at levels leas tin 0.1%by weight are not included in the RyuLtory Inhrmafion urtica dads ZavirenDaotal Data Sheet. Trate solvents present at levels leu than 0.1%by weight an net indadsd is the Solvents Section of obs Environment Data Shoat. 'Chemical cempoundc pmsriNM as a malt.1 Oa eaeisR prows of this Ming an stet laciudod on this Environmental Data Skeet. • SO'd d£S : ZO 00—£O—UC • CO.�4•�1VJ Li V"..JT♦yi.ii •.� 2 EN/IRDl4i NTAL rmE"jU 12/21/1999 1.+:13 514-36 -6837 1 I PPG Industries, Inc. Environmental Data Sheet Friday,December 17, 1999 Cusmmer. TonY`Myers Delaware plant PRODUCT: DCU2021 THANE CLEAR PRODUCT PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS: Weight/Gallon Product: 7.93 roe/gal Density of Organic Solvent Bland: 7.11 lbs/gal yisl&v. Vplume Non-Volatile: 49.30% 43.45 volatile: 50.70% 56.55 oh %Watar: .00% .00% VOC INFORMATION: VOC per gallon(calculated)less waw 4.021bs/gs1 4E1.6 g/Itt VOC par gallon(calculated)wi►h water: 4.02 Nigel 481.6 gilt VOC per gallon of Solids: 9.31bi1gal 1114. 2/1tr VOC per pound of Salida: 1.03 tb/lb Pound of HAPS per Pound of Solids: .725 SOLVENT COMPOSITION; PERCENT OF TOTAL FORMULAt Sault Campoaikion ELEgol >itLV81 1330.207 XYLENES 55.51 31.7Z 110.63.0 NETVYL (t-AM1L) ItTOME 14.44 16.84 100.41-4 /T$YL NIRSKE 6.43 7.06 90'd d£S : ZO 00-£0-wer • 12/21/1953 15:13 614-362-6537 __- •••• ENVIRONMIENTAL rr VHA.`, I PPG Industries, Inc. • E>dvlronmental Data Sheet Friday,December 17, 1999 P ODUCI: DCV2021 VRE1`13ANE CLEAR REGULATORY INFORMATION BASED ON 1 GALLONS SUPPLIED: S Com lS MBA 10Q-41-4 OtNrt uuauf .31 .23 Yes los Tei 100.42•S rind aOttONUt ,02 .01 Tea 1330-20-1 rrlIMEfa 2.29 1.04 Yes 1!1i $0-12-6 METHYL METMAC*YLA'f! .02 .01 Tea Tes DISCLAIMER Ma Environmental Data Sheet is not intruded to replete the product',Material Safety Data Sheet. Tha dm toalalned Ia this Eavlronureetal Data Sheet to based on Inlbretattsa provided to PPG by its *Wier:and PPt3's knowledge of PPG proda/t formulatieas. PPG auks/me rapfeentadea or warranty rapardln f fee accuracy of dila►aferotatbn or that the information or data will not dam. The tafoeautfea provided In We 2rtvirwa,Deotat Data Sheet is Dot Winded to tad does eat orate legal rights or obligations. 11th*formation U provided for the solo ase of PPG customers end Is cot tar disclosers to compitifers of PPG. PPG eadamers have an independent elongation to debrolbo paper see the taibrroatlos aid that their uses of the information is aonstataat with*dent,data and lout Isla,calm and rarylatioth. Trace coartitutate pewit at Wetting than 0.1%by weight are not Weirdest in the Ppu3atrry latonraltos sestism of Ole Enviswoeteatsi Data Sheet. Traea Womb plaint at levels less than 0.1%by weight ars not included to the Solvents Section of the Envlraasneat Data Sham. Chemical aawpearda venerated u a mutt of tea coins Bracco alibis coating are dot iactaded on tbh Eavfreanreaal Data Skeet LO'd dbS : ZO 00—£0—wet. _ vV YVN�J�jL1,E 12121/1593 15:13 614-362-6837 ENVIRGt1.4.4t L r.;, U18, PPG Industries, Inc. ' • Environmental Data Sheet Friday,December 17,1999 CUlltaner. Tony'Mye$ Delaware plant rRolwcr: DCX 1 LOW VOC HARDE j pRODUCT nristCA1 CHARACTSRLS'TICS: Weight/034M product: 8.9S Wise Nosily of Organic Solvent3knd: 6.10 1bVga1 ?ALIA Volume Notl•Volatita: 13.91% 78.11 Volatile: 16.09% 21.19% %Water. .00% .00% VOC INFORMATION: VOC par gallon(calculated)len water: 1A4 lbs/gal 172.5 6/la VOC per gallon(calculated)with water. 1.44 161/;t1 172.5 gar VOC per gallon of Solids: 1.1 lbs/gal 215.6 gilt VOC por pound of Solids: A9 lb/lb Pound of HAPS per Pound of Solids: .006 SOLVZNT COMPOSITION: PERCZNT OF TOTAL FORMULA: B yv ipil4 �� Compeaitlon . 1321111411 Ito-43-0 lellirI (W•AMYU KE:ton 16.07 zT.Ta 80'd d17S : ZO 00-Eo-uer VaC per gauan(OsiGYtaank,sagas It w••l --- --- VOC pet p11ao(calculated)with watts': ' 6.91 lbs/gal $27.3 gilts VOC per gallon of Solids; 0 lbs/p1 .00 dltr VOC per ped of Solids: .00 Vo/lb • SOLVENT CoMpOSMON: PERCENT OF TOTAL FORMULA: i� air Velnme C�By Cainno l 32.4.T 37.t3 'R•93-3 *ETHYL ETHYL KETONE 22.41 14.25 106454i•NETM07lY•Z-pRapCL ACETATE 19.00 13.21 100•011-3 TOLUENE00 13.14 103Z•32.' Y.M. AND P. )IAPt%TM4 16.3.56 3.19 6674.2•99-1 MOTH! 3.16 3.56 101•07-2 !6<TXYLCYG�oNt yA►tt? 3.15 3.55 142.620 K-MEPTAME •11 .09 70657-70-4 2•M[TMOxY•1-PRCPYt. ACETATE -- -- =lit imi mmr Tali AM,.-•44r4 A a T..e. TOO 30dd Sf O I f13Nd WOad 3flN I INOO • PPG Industries, Inc, Environmental Data Sheet Friday,December 17, 1999 PRODUCT: DCX61 LOW VOC HARDENER i REGULATORY INFORMATION RASED ON 1 GALLONS SUPPLIED: C.6,fit St nvitiop sal SAS szi_Q4_Q NaxanaTilYI.ENE•0I.rt0cTNe*TE .04 .02 rNs • ++ No Yes incl OtIsacYMATE5 DISCLAIMER Thu Environmental Data Shat is ant intended to replace the predect's Materiel Biddy Dots Sheet. The data eostsincd la this Eovlreninteltsl Data 9best is based as information presided to PPG by Its supplies aid irtirs knowledge orl'PG product forn'ulatleos. ?PG man Ao rapresentsttos or watraaty regarding the mural if Thar lafarrostien or that the information or data sill net ahseps. The Information provided in this Environmental Data abase Is oat Wooded to sad does not crate legal rights or obligates. This information is provided for the sole use of PPG evst nor.aid IS not for I'sltiatire to temlietttora of?PG. rPG customers have ss independent obligation to deterlala*proper use oftbe Winooski sad abet Mir use of the loformstioa is consuisteat with fedasnl,state sna local Low.rules lad regulations. Trace constituents present at levels less than 0.1%by weight ars not Included is the Regulatorylater/satioa iec4oe of Ibis Environmental Data Sheet. Trace setvsnte pracet at levels lees Ass 0.1%by welaht era not loshtded io the BoNents Section of the Iavirenmest Dela meet. tbesatcslsompeunds generated u s result of the corms proven'ofIbls coating are Net ineluded on thh IawheilsemulDaen Shoot 60 d dtt9 =ZO 00—EO—u' CITY OF SHAKOPEE /6; V Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Resolution Upholding AMCON Construction's Appeal of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals(BOAA)Denial of a Request for a Conditional Use Permit(CUP)for a Vehicle Repair Facility located in Crossroads Center at Vierling Drive and CSAH 17. MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 INTRODUCTION: On December 7, 1999 the Council heard AMCON's appeal of the BOAA's denial of its request for a for a CUP for a vehicle repair facility(i.e.body shop)to be operated by Precision Collision. At that meeting the Council heard from residents of the Meadows South Townhomes,who expressed a number of concerns about the proposed use. The Council provided direction to the applicants to meet with the townhome owners and association members to see if the issues could be satisfactorily addressed, and report back to the Council at its December 21, 1999 meeting. The report was made, and the townhome association went on record in support of the approved use with the conditions that had been discussed with the applicants,property owners,and their agents. Council directed staff to prepare a resolution approving the CUP with conditions. This item has not been placed on the consent agenda because of the attached request from Jay Lyle, 1463 Sage Court. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve Resolution No. 5302,a resolution upholding the appeal of AMCON Construction, and granting the requested CUP with conditions as presented. 2. Approve Resolution No. 5302,a resolution upholding the appeal of AMCON Construction, and granting the requested CUP with conditions as presented. 3. Do not approve Resolution No. 5302. 4. Table the matter for additional information. ACTION REQUESTED: 5. Offer and approve approve Resolution No. 5302,a resolution upholding the appeal of AMCON Construction, and granting the requested CUP with conditions as presented. o R. Michael Leek i:\commdev\cc\2000\cc14\\amcon.doc Community Development Director RESOLUTION NO.5302 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE UPHOLDING THE APPEAL OF AMCON CONSTRUCTION OF A DECISION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS,AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUP)FOR OPERATION OF A VEHICLE REPAIR FACILITY IN THE CROSSROADS CENTER WHEREAS,the City of Shakopee received an application from AMCON(the applicant) dated October 7, 1999,whereby it requested CUP for a motor vehicle repair facility on property legally described as Lot 1,Block 1,Crossroads Center Third Addition,City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota;and WHEREAS,the proper public hearing notices were sent,posted,or published, and on November 4, 1999 a public hearing on the requested variance was held before the Board of Adjustments and Appeals(BOAA);and WHEREAS,the BOAA denied the requested variance based on its findings that the request did not meet several of the criteria for CUPs contained in the Shakopee City Code: and WHEREAS,the applicant appealed the decision of the BOAA, and its appeal was heard by the City Council at its meeting of December 7 and December 21, 1999;and WHEREAS,it has been made to appear that the applicant,property owners,and their agents have been able to satisfactorily address the concerns of the City Council and residents of the neighboring Meadows South Townhomes. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA,that it adopts the following findings relative to the appeal of AMCON Construction Company, 1. The Council has received evidence that concerns about screening,noise, and pollution have been adequately addressed by the applicant, and that the proposed conditional use will not be injurious to the use and the enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes which are already permitted,nor would it substantially diminish or impair property values in the area. 2. The Council has received no evidence that the use would impede the orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses predominant in the area. 3. Adequate utilities,access roads,drainage and parking have already been or will be provided with the construction of the proposed facility to serve the site. 4. The use of the property is consistent with the purposes of the B-1 Zone in which the project is located with the attached conditions. 5. The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area for commercial use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the appeal by AMCON Construction Company is upheld, and that its request for a CUP for a vehicle repair facility on the above-described property is hereby approved with the following conditions; a. Landscaping must be installed according to plan received October 7, 1999. b. This CUP approval does not constitute approval of any signs for the proposed use, and a sign permit must be obtained for any and all signs, which in turn must comply with the City Code. c. This Conditional Use Permit is for vehicle body repair only. If a sales lot or engine service shop is proposed in the future, an amendment must be obtained for that use. d. Vehicles shall not be stored on the site except in the screened storage area located on the south side of the building as depicted on the site plans. e. No loudspeaker or public address system that is audible from any residential property shall be allowed. I. A landscaped buffer at least 100 feet wide from any residential zone as depicted on the site plans shall be installed and maintained. g. Trash enclosure structures must be fully enclosed, including a top. h. A white cedar screening fence shall be installed as shown on plans approved by the City staff. This fence shall not exceed six(6)feet in height, except that a higher fence shall be permitted to screen the existing pylon sign. The point on the Crossroads Center property where the six(6)foot fence shall terminate, as well as the height of the screening fence for the pylon sign, shall be subject to approval by City staff. i. The applicant, property owners, and their heirs, transferees and assigns shall be responsible for the maintenance of the above-described fence, and the area in and around the fence. j. Should the owner/operator of the motor vehicle repair facility change or any expansion of the facility be proposed, a new CUP must be obtained. k. Air pollution control equipment shall remove at least 98%of all contaminants before air is vented to the out of doors, such equipment shall be subject to any applicable state, county, or local standards, and may be subject random inspection. 1. This CUP shall become void Wit is not used within one year from the adoption of this resolution. m. The facility may only be opened for business and auto repairing may only take place from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays. No business or auto repairing may be conducted at the facility on weekends or holidays. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,Minnesota,held the day of ,2000. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk PREPARED BY: City of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee,MN 55379 I _ I 1 F!kill-411N`.$ ..a.L�.LI,I.,.,g 1 I J i' 11���1/1 ' !1! ifili l i ����I I riliNte Al P , 1119• 11, , ifidivilpila d i ii !j1iI„i � jil !1 I1I'% A i h. 4011 nr !iI l h . '{ : 1 ii SI i i ---- -------e040,404,-,.....0410...,14. -1 gati __=_ e-_ a i4, � � o42,1s - — � ;/ ii i— ----1 0 1 1 i 1 Ott.i Al 4 A i r- : k ' 'I 0 , U I S; ` e, 19:0 tom $ r I�O : a C �o ` f o 5 I 410, y 1 i 1 of i O7,5 1 , WWI(�-JClCl1� �A. III{ rI• t, i ri `J I i I p IA p Gu - o o co C.0 I glOro�OeveLal'I�ir .1 I I I I I i l 1 1 1 ;Ij1 10 r i 1 ; PRECISION AUTO COLLISION III I il(6 ill 1 i I . ■AKOPEE,I I 0 1 I 24 December 1999 Jay Collin Lyle _ 1 1463 Sage Court Shakopee, MN 55379 DEC 2 7 1999 day: 651-733-0885 home: 612-496-0791 jaylyle@excite.com By Michael Leek Community Development Director City of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mr. Leek: Enclosed, please find a copy of a letter sent to Joe Ryan of Oppidan Investment Company. This is a great opportunity to fix the few remaining problems with the Crossroads Center. Also, myself and a number of neighbors would like to speak on the issue. Can the Auto body shop CUP be removed from CityCouncil consent agenda? I will be contacting you later this week to discuss the issue. Regards, ?iriCesett-34, lin Lyle 23 December 1999 Jay Collin Lyle 1463 Sage.Court Shakopee, MN 55379 Mr. Joe Ryan President Oppidan Investment Company 5125 County Road 101 Suite 100 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Dear Mr. Ryan: Thank you for taking the time to discuss the Shakopee Crossroads/Fence issue with me on the 23rd. A fence extending to Vierling drive would solve most remaining issues we have with the closeness of the shopping center. Extending the fence down to Vierling Drive would: 1) Decrease garbage from blowingin our yards. 9 9 2) Attenuate noise. 3) Stop people from using our yards as a shortcut to the shopping center. If the fence were stopped behind Cub Foods, this would "funnel" the foot traffic to my back yard. Joe, garbage, noise and foot traffic has been a problem since the shopping center opened. Even though it is not a requirement in the pending CUP, extending the fence the short distance to Vierling Drive would be greatly appreciated by my family and neighbors. Regards, Jay Collin Lyle cc: Michael Leek /5, 8- Date: January 4, 2000 To: City of Shakopee Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator From: Members of the Shakopee Environmental Protection Association Subject: Concerns about the costs/process of Alternative Urban Areawide Review(AUAR) for proposed Valley Green Corporate Center In the memo from Mr. Michael Leek, dated January 4, 2000, it seems to outline the scope of the AUAR. Our concern is that if these are the parameters on which this AUAR is to be based, then where are the other citizens concerns some of which are outlined in the Petition for an EAW dated November 10, 1999. Examples are: the impacts on the wildlife, impacts of tree removal, the ecology of the area, rare plants and animals, Indian artifacts, impacts on infrastructure & public services to name a few. We are concerned that the scope of the AUAR may not meet the environmental concerns of our community. The Comprehensive Plan points out the sensitivity of the area and the need to limit development. None of the statements in the plan seem to be addressed. Data is to being gathered from various sources. No mention is made of the data that is available from the Lower Minnesota Watershed District and US Fish & Wildlife Services to name just two of many sources. Should or can a reasonable cost be place on the AUAR process? If a cost is placed on the process, what happens if the study goes beyond the cost estimate? Will the city be held to this figure and will the city be required to pay the rest? Where does the study go if these estimates are exceeded? Why does the city (its citizens) pay for the cost of the AUAR when the developer alters the landscape and especially in this case where it was known that this is a sensitive area and some areas should not have been altered? Why doesn't the developer bear the entire costs? What keeps the AUAR from favoring the developer versus the environment? Who determines what should be and what should not be studied? How do the citizens incorporate their concerns into the AUAR process? How will the citizens be kept apprised of the AUAR process? What will be the total ramifications of this process? Please consider our statements and questions in your approval to proceed with the AUAR process. The Shakopee Environmental Protection Association would appreciate a written response. Si erely, • David J Cz.1 Acting President of the Shakopee Environmental Protection Association 1- c CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R.Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Costs of Alternative Urban Areawide Review(AUAR)for proposed Valley Green Corporate Center MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 INTRODUCTION: On Wednesday,December 22, 1999 Bruce Loney and myself met with Ron Roetzel of Bolton& Menk to discuss the scope of an AUAR as opposed to the EAW that was originally ordered. A copy of the draft scope of work document with cost estimate is attached for the Council's information. Council may recall that the estimate for an EAW was$7,000 to$9,000. In the scope of services document,that equates to the$9,000 for the core AUAR document. Staff has communicated these cost estimates to Jon Albinson of Valley Green Business Park,and he has, at this time indicated,that he is still willing to share in the estimated costs on a 50:50 basis. Staff is requesting confirmation of Council's determination to proceed in light of the revised costs. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer and approve a motion,or direct staff by consensus,to proceed with the AUAR consistent with the scope of services outlined by Bolton&Menk,Inc. R. Michael Leek Community Development Director is\commdevkx\2000\ccO 104\WUAR.doc • BOSTON 8i. M ' N K , INC_ Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 1515 East Highway 13 • Burnsville, MN 55337-6857 December 22, 1999 Phone (612) 890-0509 • FAX(612) 890-8065 Mr. Bruce Loney Public Works Director City of Shakopee 1255 Fuller Street Shakopee, MN 55379-1351 a Re: Alternative Urban Areawide Review Document(AUARD) Valley Green Business Park Shakopee,MN BMI No. T11.20132 Dear Mr. Loney, In accordance with Section I-C-2 (Major Projects) of our Agreement for Professional services with the City of Shakopee,this extension agreement is written to provide you with an estimate of cost for professional engineering services for the above referenced project. In order to address all of the potential environmental issues for this project,we are proposing to use Braslau Associates for the noise and air quality analysis and indirect source permit; and Wenck Associates for the groundwater analysis of Shiely's gravel pit dewatering, and impacts of Dean's Lake. We are proposing to complete each of the following environmental review tasks on a cost reimbursable basis,with a maximum cost not-to-exceed as follows: 1. Kickoff Meeting/Review Existing Documents $2,500 ° � 3 e-t.2- 2. 2. AUARD Core Document $9,000 3. Noise Analysis $3,800 ,324, e .24e -`- 4. Air Quality Analysis $6,300 " 5. Indirect Source Permit Requirements $7,700 6. Shiely Gravel Pit Dewatering Impacts a. If Shiely uses surficial aquifer $5,100 b. If Shiely uses another aquifer $7,800 7. Dean's Lake Impacts $2,400 8. Public Hearing $2,500 1 MANKATO • FAIRMONT • SLEEPY EYE • BURNSVILLE • WILLMAR AMES, IA • LIBERTY, MO An Equal Opportunity Employer The above estimated costs are based upon the following conditions and data: 1. Kickoff Meeting/Review Existing Documents A meeting will be held with all key members of the project including the owner, developer, City and the Bolton&Menk team. This meeting will discuss the project scope, staging,needs of the AUARD study and transfer of existing documentation and reports. In addition, a meeting is planned with MPCA and the Bolton Menk team to discuss the parameters of the project and the scope of the indirect source permit requirements. Bolton&Menk will assemble the document,using the studies proposed under tasks 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7. The following data and reports will be furnished by the City of Shakopee: A Site Layout/Concept plan(in digital format), showing project staging. B. Wetland Delineation and Mitigation Plan and Report C. Traffic Impact study and plan(WSB and SRF). D. Aerial photos of those existing conditions(prior to commencing the grading operations), showing the location and density of trees. E. Previous reports on adjacent sites,including Shiely gravel mining impact study, South Ridge EAW, etc. F. Traffic Studies 1. Supplemental traffic analyses for the periods one year after the opening of each major phase of the project, assuming that the project will be phased over time. Normally,the analysis of traffic and air quality for two time periods is sufficient but three may be required depending upon how the project is phased. 2. For each phase,project traffic volumes(turning movements) at critical intersections for the PM Peak Hour and daily traffic(for the Indirect Source Permit Application)as well as roadway geometry and information on signal timing and level of service. G. Copy of Dean's Lake study by Itasca Engineering. 2. AUARD Core Document This document will be prepared following guidelines prepared by the Environmental Quality Board(EQB),dated April 2, 1999. 3. Noise Analysis Determine sensitive receptor identification;review impact of tree removal on noise levels;model of noise from project-related traffic,determine potential noise 2 impacts from on-site sources,develop mitigation measures; complete text for AUARD; respond to comments on noise. 4. Air Quality Analysis Develop CO background and limits for project;review receptor geometrics; complete modeling of key intersections; identify and develop mitigation measures;review regulatory issues; complete text for AUARD; and respond to comments on air quality . 5. Indirect Source Permit(ISP)Requirements Compile land use and zoning information;prepare draft ISP Application; review with client and City of Shakopee; submit application to MPCA; respond to questions; assist with fact sheet and draft permit. 6. Shiely Gravel Pit Dewatering Impacts a. Obtain groundwater use data from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for Shiely and any other major water users in the vicinity. b. Contact Shiely directly to inquire as to the existence and availability of any site-specific groundwater monitoring data or reports. The local transmissivity of the aquifer tapped by Shiely will then be estimated and reconciled with available.data. It is assumed that Shiely's source is the surficial aquifer. If Shiely draws its water from other than the surficial aquifer, then additional estimates will need to be made to characterize the hydraulic connection between the surficial aquifer and the aquifer used by Shiely. The effects on the water table of the cessation of Shiely's operations will then be calculated for the Valley Green business park area. c. Document the findings and conclusions of the evaluation. 7. Dean's Lake Impacts a. Contact and obtain any available relevant data from the DNR(in particular, lake level data if available) and the Met Council. The potential for the site grading to impair Dean's Lake's ability to maintain its water. level will then be assessed. b. Document the findings and conclusions of the evaluation. 3 • 8. Public Hearing This task will include preparation for and attending one(1)public hearing to present the results of the AUARD. BMI will prepare up to three(3) exhibits, provided the base drawing or map is furnished to us if the exhibit relates to a report to study,prepared by others(i.e.,traffic study,wetland impact study, etc.) Please note that Wenck's previous work for Shiely(actually for British-based CAMAS,now Shiely's parent company)was for the Grey Cloud Island operation and concerned the evaluation of potential environmental impacts there. We are available to commence with the AUARD study as soon as authorized by the City and would anticipate a draft report within 60 days. This scope of work can be modified to meet your needs and requirements. The City of Shakopee agrees to reimburse Bolton&Menk,Inc. (BMI) for these services in accordance with Section IV of the Agreement for Professional Services. If this extension agreement meets with your approval,please sign and return one(1)of the two (2) enclosed copies to our office. Sincerely, BOLTO &MENK,INC. City Administrator ona . . Roetze ,PE City Clerk Office Manager Enclosures (2) Mayor cc: Mike Leek Date 4 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Comments on EAW for Q Prime Site for Proposed Ampitheater MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 INTRODUCTION: The City has received the attached EAW for comment. Staff has reviewed the EAW,and intends to make comment on the traffic analysis specifically,and the likelihood of the needed roadway improvements being adequately funded or made. Council is asked to provide staff with any other comment it deems appropriate to include in the City's official comments on the EAW. ACTION REQUESTED: Direct staff to include additional comments in the City's response to the Q-Prime Ampitheater EAW. All/ s _ - R. N ichael Leek Community Development Director i:\commdev\c62000\cc0104\\QPrime.doc I 1 I I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT I WORKSHEET I (EAW) I IFor I I Q-PRIM [ AMPHITHEATER I I I I Louisville and I Sand Creek I Township/s I Scott County, Minnesota I I 1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET 1 (EAW) ' NOTE TO REVIEWERS: ' This EAW is also available for viewing on the Scott County Website at "hffp://www.co.scott.mn.us." If you have access to the Internet, viewing on the Website affords ease of accessing references and exhibits. ' The Environmental Assessment Worksheet provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW is prepared by the Responsible Governmental Unit or its agents to determine whether an Environmental ' Impact Statement should be prepared. The project proposer has supplied the data necessary to describe their project for this worksheet but this Worksheet was prepared by Scott County. Scott County is presenting the developer's analysis of critical elements such as traffic, noise and surface water runoff impacts. The developer's submittal was critiqued for completeness and appropriate level of detail and to assure that standard methods and computer models were used where required. Comments must be submitted to Scott County (see Item #3) during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of the information, potential impacts that may warrant further investigation, and the need for an EIS. If the EAW has been prepared for the scoping of an EIS (see Item #4), comments should address the accuracy and completeness of the information and suggest issues for investigation in the EIS. I. Project Title: Q Prime Amphitheater 2. Proposer: ,. ' Q Prime, Inc Contact Person: Marshal Braman ' Title: Senior Environmental Specialist Address: Schoell & Madson, Inc. 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1 ' Minnetonka, MN 55305 Phone: (612) 546-7601 Fax: (612) 546-9065 ' E-mail: marshalbraman@schoellmadson.com 3. RGU: Scott County ' contact Person: Allen Frechette Title: Environmental Health Manager Address: 200 4th Ave W, Rm. A102 ' Shakopee, MN 55379-1393 Phone: (612)496-8177 Fax: (612)496-8496 E-mail: .. afrechette@co.scott.mn.us 1 t 1 4. Reason for.EEAW Preparation (Check one): EIS Scarping, X Mandatory EAW, Citizen Petition, RGU Discretion, Proposer Volunteered): If EAW or EIS,is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number 4410.4300 subpart 34 and subpart nm ae_Construction of a new sports or entertainment facility designed for or expected to accommodate a peak attendance of 5,000 or more persons, or the expansion of an existing sports or entertainment facility by this amount. I And: 4410.4300 subpart 14 B._and subpart name_Construction of a new or expansion of an existing industrial, commercial, or institutional facility, other than a warehousing or I light industrial facility, equal to or in excess of the following thresholds, expressed as gross floor space: 1) unincorporated area, 100,000 square feet. 4410.4300 subpart 36. and-subpart name A.Golf courses, residential development I p _ Pa _ P where the lot size is less than five acres, and other projects resulting in the permanent!, conversion of 80 or more acres of agricultural, native prairie, forest, or naturally I vegetated land, except that this subpart does not apply to agricultural land inside the boundary of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area established by the Metropolitan Council , 5. Project Location: County: Scott Township/s: Louisville, and Sandcreek, ' Portions of Section 33, Township 115N; and of Section 4, Township 114N, both in Range 23W. Attach each of the following to the EAW: • County map showing the general location of the project. ' (See "Exhibit A") • U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating.the"-project boundaries. (See "Exhibit B") • Site plan showing all significant project and natural features. I 1 2 See the following exhibits: C. Existing Drainage Areas. ' D. Proposed Drainage Areas. E. Project Site Layout Plan. ' F. Soil Classification Map. G-1. Existing Flood Plain & Steep Slopes. tG-2. Proposed Flood Plain & Steep Slopes. H. Impervious Surfaces & Off-Site Drainage Route. tI. Well Location/s Map. J. Map showing Ground Water Susceptibility Areas. K. Map showing Bedrock Formations Underlying Site. L. Existing Wetland & Proposed Storm Sewer Outlet. ' M-1. County Zoning Map. M-2. Surrounding Properties Map. N. Minnesota Historical Society Letter. O. DNR Natural Heritage & Nongame Research Program Letter. ' P. Proposed Irrigation System. ' 6. Description a. Provide a project summary of 50 words or less to bepublished in the EQB"Monitor. The proposed facility is a 19,250 seat indoor/outdoor entertainment facility. The ' facility will accommodate 7,274 persons under a roof and 11,976 persons on the grassed area. The main performance season will run from Memorial Day to Labor Day. Smaller performances and activities will occur throughout the year. (see "Exhibit E") 1 1 3 1 1 1 a. Give,a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Emphasize construction, operation methods and features that will causephysical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes Include modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes and significantrdemol tion, removal or remodeling of existing structures. Indicate the timing and duration of construction activities. The site was previously owned by Scott County and was intended to be used for a ' solid waste compost and transfer facility. The site was never developed for that purpose and was subsequently sold to Oglebay Norton who intended to reopen the silica sand mining operation. Oglebay Norton decided to sell the property to Q-Prime rather than reopen the mining operation. Previous to the County's acquisition, the land was used for silica sand mining and processing. Previous to that it was a truck farm and a hog feedlot. The land was irrigated for crops with a large irrigation well due to the sandy soil conditions. Q-Prime owns 112.74 acres on which they propose to construct a 19,250 seat indoor/outdoor entertainment facility. Seating under the roof will accommodate 7,274 persons. The remaining 11,976 persons will be seated on the grassed area. The 111 performance season will generally begin around Memorial Day and run through Labor Day. Other performances and activities will occur from time to time either before of after these dates but on a less frequent basis. Because the seating areas will not be heated, weather conditions will restrict facility activities. Construction is proposed to begin as soon as permitted by the County, townships and other regulatory agencies to allow completion for the 2000 summer performance season. Construction is proposed to proceed during the winter months. Normal construction equipment such as backhoes, scrapers, bulldozers and dump trucks will be used to move soils around the site. Standard earthworking measures will be used to prepare the site for use as an amphitheater. All existing buildings will be removed from the site owned by Q-Prime as is shown on "Exhibit C." The existing buildings will either be moved off the site or demolished and hauled to a demolition debris landfill. the project will be cared out bya governmental unit., I b, Explain the project purpose,if p tett �� explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. The purpose of this project is to construct and operate an outdoor musical entertainment facility. c. Are future stages of this development including development on any outlots planned or likely to happen? Yes, X No 1 4 ' d. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? _ Yes, X No if yes, briefly=°describe`the past development,timeline and any past environmental review. 7. Project Magnitude Data: "Total Project Area(Acres) 112.74 ' Number of Residential Units 0 Unattached N/A Attached N/A ' Maximum units per building N/A Commercial,Industrial or 103,892 Institutional Building Area (Gross Floor (see Space):,`"Total Square Feet table below) ' Amphitheater Area (gross floor space): Backstage Building (26') 5,100 2 Restroom Buildings (26') 10,556 ' East Concessions (26') 3,972 West Concessions (26') 5,700 ' Administration / Box Office (26') 2,100 2 Lawn Kiosks (18') 640 2 Plaza Kiosks (18') 1,200 ' 3 Entry Kiosks (18') 750 Stage (80') 6,600 Seating Pavilion under roof (65') 60,000 ' Total includes All Area under roof 103,892 ' 5 1 8. ' Permits and°Approvals"Required: List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental-review of plans and all direct and indirect forms..of-public financial assistance including bond guarantees,Tax.Increment Financing and infrastructure.rtri ' bur° _a „fit State: MN Depart of Health Food Concession License (MDH) To be Submitted MDH Water WellPermit and Non Community Water.Supply License To be Submitted MN DNR Ground Water Allocation-' Water Appropriation Permit To be Submitted MN PollutionControl Storm Water Construction Activity Agency, National PollutionDischarge . To be Submitted (MPCA) Elimination System MPCA Indirect.Source.Permit To be Submitted MPCA Y,,Underground Storage Tank-Permit To be Submitted MN"Department of Highway Ams Permit-Turn Lanes, Transportation(MnDD ') Signal."Timing, Proposed To be Submitted Improvements Impacting IH 169 local: Scott County Building and Septic System":Permits° To be Submitted Scott County Plan"Appr nor val To be Submitted Scott County Conditional Use Permit To be Submitted Scott County Soil&Water Drainage/Erosion/Sedimentation Plan Conservation.District ", To be Submitted (SWCD) Sand Creek Township Road access permit To be Submitted Louisville Township- Project Review and Recommendation Sand Creel(Township , Developer's Agreement To be Submitted 9. Land Use: Describe current and recent past land use and development on:the.site and I on adjacent lands. Discuss project compatibility with adjacent and nearby land,uses. Indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify any potential environmental hazard due to past site uses,such as soil contamination or I abandoned storage tanks or proximity to nearby hazardous":liquid or.gas pipelines. The amphitheater activities will take place on a 112.74-acre parcel of land formerly ' owned by Ogelbay Norton (see "Exhibit/s A, E, M-1 & M-2"). Scott County owned the land prior to Ogelbay Norton and had intended to construct a solid waste processing facility on the site. Scott County decided not to proceed with the solid waste facility following decisions on several Federal Court cases involving solid waste flow control which greatly affected the economic viability of such facilities. 6 ' Between 1981 and 1986, approximately 100 acres of the parcel was used for silica sand mining and processing by the Shiely Corporation. Only about 10 percent of the site was actually mined. Since 1986, the land has lain dormant. Trucks have continued to haul previously mined and stockpiled sand from the site. Prior to 1981, the parcel was used for agricultural purposes. The Flood farm which lies within the center of the site will be demolished (some buildings may be moved). The existing wells may be used for the ' amphitheater. The Floods have operated a hog feedlot on this site in the past and most recently are operating an automobile parts salvage operation. The Flood auto parts salvage operation is licensed by Scott County as a hazardous waste generator. There is ' no evidence of any soil contamination on the Flood property. To the west of the parcel are a portion of the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge ' Area (MVNWR) and the Carver Rapids State Wayside Park. The MVNWR is managed and operated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. South of the parcel are several commercial businesses. A nursery tree farm is located east of the property on the east. 1 The remainder of the adjoining lands are used for agriculture. The property is zoned I-1, Industrial, as is the property to the north and south. An "outdoor ' commercial recreational use" is noted in the zoning ordinance as a conditional use permit in the I-1 zoning district. An outdoor commercial recreational use is recognized in the zoning ordinance as a compatible use of property in all zoning districts except the four residential zoning districts of the County (see "Exhibit/s M-1 & M-2"). Only the area between the two sets of railroad tracks will be used for the amphitheater. This acreage is entirely zoned for industrial development (see also response to EAW Item #27). ' Prior to the purchase of the property by Q Prime, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was performed in December 1998 by Schoell & Madson, Inc. As part of this assessment, a review of aerial photographs confirmed that the area surrounding the ' project site to the north, east and south has historically been agricultural, with the development of the tree farm to the east and the mining operations at the site occurring during the 1980s. In preparing the Site Assessment, Schoell & Madson, Inc., contacted ' the MPCA and Scott County to determine if there were any environmental concerns associated with the property. The primary results of this investigation were as follows: There was no evidence in MPCA records to indicate that the property was used as an ' open dump or landfill or as a disposal point for any type of hazardous waste. Furthermore, there was no evidence in MPCA records to indicate that there have been underground storage tank releases or spills of petroleum or hazardous substances at the • 1 property or within a one-mile radius of the property. Scott County licenses several generators of hazardous waste within a mile of the property. Bruce A. Liesch & Associates prepared a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment on this property in 1991. The assessment identified a monitoring well and two transformers. They also noted two above-ground storage tanks on the property that showed visible signs of soil contamination beneath them. Liesch recommended that a Phase II investigation be conducted to determine the magnitude and extent of contamination and ' that the monitoring well be sampled and analyzed for organic and heavy metal constituents. 7 1 I Liesch conducted the Phase II investigation, and soil samples were taken from under the I transformers and from the stained areas near the above-ground storage tanks. No PCB contamination was detected, while very low levels of fuel products were found near the tanks. The fuel contamination was probably due to spillage while refueling, and has I since been cleaned up by excavation and thin spreading of the contaminated soil. 10. Cover Types:Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following.cover types before and after development. '� -'.< ' .,. r .a x [`F r? a, y =i 6; Types'1 to 8:Wetlands' 0 0 Wooded/Forest 0 0 Brush/Grasastand 110.34 0 Cropland 0 Urban/S urban Lawn,Landscaping ' 0 10.66 Impervious-surface: Buildings, etc. .40 2.38 Other--e(describe): I Bituminous Pavement(on site) 0 7.32 Bituminous Pavement(off site) 0 1.22 Plaza (impervious) 0 5.75 Gravel Roadway and Parking 1 30.35 Grass Parking 1 36.41 Prairie 0 14.40 I Storm Water Pond, permanent pool 0 5.47 (Storm Water Pond, 100 year flood) 0 (7.02) I Totals: . 112.74 113.96 If Before and After totals are not equal,explain why. A total of 1.22 acres of additional bituminous is required for turning lanes off of the property along U.S. Highway 169 and on Bluff Drive. These modifications will be paid for by Q-Prime. This additional area is outside of the Q-Prime property boundaries but is directly associated with the project. 11. Fish, Wildlife,and Ecologically Sensitive Resources: I a. Identify fish and wildlife resources and habitats on or near.the site and.descaibe:l ow they would be affected by the project. Describeany measures to be taken to I . minimize or avoid adverse impacts. Essentially the entire project site has been previously disturbed by either agricultural or mining activities. Having lain dormant for approximately 10 years, the former quarry portion of the site has become sparsely vegetated with pioneer weedy species. I 8 I 1 ' Examination of the Jordan East National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map indicates that no wetlands are present on the proposed amphitheater site. Barr Engineering Company's biologist and wetland specialist also indicated the absence of wetland ' during a 1996 site visit. That site visit also indicated that the project site includes no native prairie land. A site inspection by Schoell & Madson, Inc., environmental specialists in 1997, and again in 1998, confirmed that neither native prairie nor wetlands are present on the site. The adjacent wetlands, MVNWR and Minnesota River provide important habitat for ' many birds, mammals and other species. No project work, except the stormwater outlet, will take place west of the west railroad tracks. Fish and other aquatic species within those wetlands and MVNWR should, therefore, be unaffected by the project. ' Numerous wildlife species including wild turkeys, eagles, hawks, owls, pheasants, deer, fox, coyote and raccoons are commonly observed on the project site and neighboring properties. The project will significantly alter this site and will result in changes to wildlife habitat and use of the property. Traffic, human activity and sound resulting from this project will likely have some impact on wildlife within neighboring U natural areas. Fencing will restrict movement of wildlife from entering onto and across the property, as well as human activity. ' A site visit was conducted on April 15, 1999, with representatives from: Q-Prime's consultant team, MN Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services and Scott County. The site visit was intended to provide an opportunity for a review of the natural features of the site and to acquire a first hand sense of the location of the proposed amphitheater and appurtenant features relative to on-site and adjacent natural areas. b. Are any state-listed(end angered,threatened, or.special-cor cern),sl res; rare plant communities or other sensitive ecological resources=such°as native prairie habitat, colonial water bird nesting colonies or regionally rare.plant communities on or near the site? ' X Yes No If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the pmject, 'indicate if a ' site survey of the resources has been conducted and describe,the results. if:the DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research program has been c ontacI:give the correspondence reference number: 980283. Describe measures tominimize or avoid adverse impacts, ' Because the entire project area has been disturbed by previous agricultural or mining activities, it is extremely unlikely that any rare or endangered species are present within the project area itself. However, the MN Department of Natural Resources ' (upon a review of their Natural Heritage database with reference to the project area) reports that a native prairie habitat is adjacent to the project area located west of the railroad tracks. This area will not be impacted; as shown on "Exhibit 0," all ' amphitheater activities will be confined to the area east of the closest railroad tracks. 9 1 Bald Eagle and Great Blue Heron nesting sites have been reported by DNR Officials to be present in the nearby Louisville Swamp Unit. The impact from this project to wildlife and human enjoyment of the adjacent natural resource area is acknowledged to be an aspect needing further consideration during the review process of this EAW. 12. Physical-impacts on Water Resources:;Will the project involve thephysical or hydrologic alteration dredging,filling,stream diversion,outfall structure,diking and impoundment =of any surface waterssuch as a lake, pond, wetland stream or drainage ditch? , X Yes No If yes,identify-water resource.affected and;give the DNR;Protected Waters Inventory I number(s) I the after resources affected are on the"MI 209P and 210P. Describe alternatives.casidered end proposed mitii3ation„rneasures to-minimize impacts.,,.. 1 Overall discharge rates and volumes are expected to be reduced to this wetland resulting from the use of the irrigation system (see "Exhibit P") in conjunction with the NURP , basins (storm water holding ponds designed to Nationwide Urban Runoff Program standards) (see "Exhibit/s D & H"). Two proposed storm water treatment basins have been designed to provide rate control and storage. These basins will meet NURP standards. Drainage from the site will be routed through these basins and then discharged through a sewer pipe, which will ultimately drain to wetland 210P (see "Exhibit L"). An outfall structure is included in the design and will terminate outside of the wetland and the existing ordinary high water level. When water is discharged, low levels of nutrients and solids are expected to be discharged to the wetland and from there to Sand Creek and wetland 209P. See Item #17 for further discussion. 13 ` Water Use: Will e: roject involve the installation:or abandonment-of any th ula 1 wells, connection to or changes in anypublic water supply or appropriation of ground or surface water(including dewatering). X Yes No If yes, as applicable,give location and purpose of any new wells; public super'affected, I changes to be made, and water quantities to be used;the source, duration, quantity and purpose of any appropriations; and unique well numbers and DNR appropriation permit I numbers, if known. Identify any existing and new wells orr the site map. Ifthere:are no wells known on site,.explain methodology usedto determine. Total combined water usage is estimated at below four million gallons per year. Seasonally, water needs are expected to be higher in the summer due to irrigation of the Plaza area and water needs for event attendees. The lawn area projected to be irrigated is I approximately 5.3 acres. The grass seating area and Plaza are included in this figure. Estimated irrigation water use is approximately two million gallons per year. (see "Exhibit I") for existing well locations). io ' ' Water usage at capacity events is estimated to be approximately 80,000 gallons. Water use at events below capacity are expected to correspond to attendance levels. Estimated usage per attendee is four gallons. According to Metropolitan Council ' Environmental Service's estimates, water use per day for office employees is 274 gallons for 14 employees. ' Three monitoring wells, numbered 178517, 178519 and 178520 have been properly sealed. A suspected fourth monitoring well, which records indicate was numbered 178518, has not been located. It appears that well was removed during the previous ' mining operation. No record of the abandonment was located by the Minnesota Department of Health. A condition will be placed on the Conditional Use Permit requiring the well to be properly sealed if it is found in the future. At this time, all reasonable ' attempts have been made to locate this well. All wells which remain unused on the site have been, or will be, properly sealed in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health regulations. Water is needed for the amphitheater operations for drinking, soft drink mixing, food ' preparation, dressing rooms with showers for performers, irrigation of lawn areas, sanitation and waste disposal. The required water will be obtained from one or two existing wells completed in the Franconia-Ironton/Galesville Aquifer. Both of these wells ' are located in the area of the amphitheater buildings. One well (not currently used) is a former irrigation well. The unique well number for the Irrigation well is 213577, drilled in 1973. The second well is the well currently used by the Flood Brothers operation and ' the Flood home on the property. No records are available on this well from either the Department of Health or the Minnesota Geological Survey. ' A third well is suspected to exist within a small outbuilding on the Flood Brother's property and if it has not yet been sealed it will be properly sealed. A video assessment of the former irrigation well was conducted at the request of the Minnesota Department ' of Health. This well was also test pumped and has an estimated sustained yield of approximately 500 gallons per minute. Based on the video assessment of the well and pumping tests, this well should adequately serve the needs of the facility. It is noted that the ro'ect p ) site is located within an area that is identified as highly susceptible to groundwater contamination (see "Exhibit J"). 14. Water-Related.Land Use-Management District: Does any part of theproject olve i' shoreland zoning distnct,:a delineated 100-year flood plain, or a state or-federally designated wild or scenic river land use district? ' X Yes No ' if yes, identify the district and discuss project compatibilitywith district landuse restrictions. ' The project site itself is outside of the delineated 100-year flood plain and the shoreland zoning district of Sand Creek. However, storm water runoff will be directed into Sand 1 1 1 Creek through property owned by Q-Prime, which is within the shoreland-zoning district of Sand Creek (see "Exhibit/s D & H"). The MN DNR may require a Protected Waters Permit for this project. A 21 inch storm sewer pipe will be installed west of the train tracks to allow for storm , water drainage. Part of the pipe will be installed below the 100 year floodplain elevation. Installation of the pipe will not result in a change in cross-sectional topography west of the railroad. Excess soils will be used on the amphitheater site. The surface will be reseeded after installation. 15. Water.Surface Use: Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body Yes X No 1 16. Erosion:and.S dimer ition: Give the,acreage to be graded or excavated and:the cubic yardsif soil to be moved: acres 110;cubic yards 5570,000.: Describe any steep , slopes or highly erodible soils.and identify themon the site map. Describe any erosion and sedimentation t control measures to be-used during and iter project`construction The fine sands of the Jordan sandstone and the Sparta soils on the site are subject to wind erosion. The Sparta soils are not suitable for terracing, top dressing in cuts and fills or for permanent pasture (see "Exhibit/s F & K"). However, no new large steep slopes are proposed. All exposed soils will be vegetated, except for limestone gravel covered parking areas. The steep slopes along the southwest property boundary (see "Exhibit/s G-1 & G-2") are vegetated, and will not be affected by amphitheater activities at the site. Prompt re-establishment of vegetation at the site is proposed to minimize wind or water erosion. Silt fencing will be installed in areas where erosion could impact surrounding I offsite land. Slopes on the project site are generally very gentle, with the exception of the amphitheater seating area and its backslope area. 17. Water Quality: Surface Water Runoff. a. Compare the quantity and quality of site runoffbefore and after the project. Describe ' I permanent controlsto manage or treat runoff. Describe any storm water pollution prevention plans. I Presently, the majority of the project site is vegetated and generally features mild (20:1 or flatter) slopes. Exceptions are the steeper slopes of the walls of the mined area on the south end of the site, and the steeper slopes along the west edge of the project area. There is currently no runoff from the mined area (see "Exhibit/s C & G-1"). The project site currently contributes drainage easterly to a railroad ditch and the low ' area adjacent to Trunk Highway 169, and westerly across adjacent properties and eventually to Sand Creek (see "Exhibit C"). ' 12 1 1 ' The proposed storm water management design will collect and direct all of the site runoff except for some runoff from fill embankments along the property boundaries to NURP basins (see "Exhibit D"). The primary NURP basin is located in the existing I quarry pit. The outflow from the primary NURP basin is routed to a second NURP basin. The outflow from the second NURP basin is storm sewered under an existing railroad bed and discharged into Sand Creek. (see "Exhibit H"). Water quantity control and water quality treatment will be provided by each of the two basins. The two basins were oversized to meet and improve upon NURP standard design criteria. Also included in the storm water management plan is an irrigation system for the grass parking areas (see "Exhibit P"). The source of water for the system will be the storm water runoff stored in the two NURP basins. By pumping from the two basins, water levels can be lowered below the actual outlet creating retention storage volume. Using the water stored in the basins for irrigation will reduce the post-development volumes of discharge to Sand Creek which, in turn, controls the peak discharges and reduces the nutrient loadings to Sand Creek in comparison to standard storm water pond design. The proposed irrigation system method of managing excess storm water is still being reviewed by the Scott Soil and Water Conservation District. All the runoff from the site will be directed to a new 21-inch storm sewer as opposed ' to the direction of runoff flow under current conditions depicted on "Exhibit C". A comparison analysis was performed by the developer's consultant on the "pre- and ' post-" development conditions for quantity and quality of site runoff(see "Exhibit/s C, D & H"). The results of this analysis are presented below. 1) Water Quantity Pumping water from the basin for irrigation purposes will lower the water levels so an estimated 80 to 100 percent of the storm water runoff volume generated from the site ' each year will be used for irrigation and 0 to 20 percent will be discharged to Sand Creek through a new storm water pipe. The intent of the irrigation system plan is to use all of the runoff water for irrigation and limit the Sand Creek discharge to zero; however, there will be a discharge during a 100-year event and potentially during wet periods when the irrigation system cannot keep up with the precipitation. During periods of discharge to Sand Creek, the outflow rate will be controlled by the NURP basins. ' Table 17-A summarizes the "pre- and post-" development conditions' runoff rates. The post-development detention analysis was performed using a set of three different water level elevations for each basin. These water levels represent the following conditions: • Normal water level - the irrigation system will pump until this level is reached in each basin. • High water level -the high water level of the pumping range for the irrigation system. At this water level, the basins have enough retention storage below the outlets to store the runoff from a 2-1/2" rain event. ' • Outlet elevation - at this level, the basins are full and water is discharging into Sand Creek. ' The water quantity analysis was performed using storm water modeling software based on Soil Conservation Service TR-55 methodologies. The modeling included 100-year, 10-year and 2-year design storm events. 13 I TABLE 17-A RUNOFF RATE COMPARISON A y a1 man % .. r Rai`€ ,t _ j I' `^ x'� /' r .� .+a.r ,t-„_� --r.::,:7' � ---i, �� Normal High Water Outlet Water Water Level level Level 100 Year 10.0 cfs 1.2 cfs 3.4 cfs 6.7 cfs I 10 Year 2.0cfs 0cfs 0.8cfs 1.2cfs 2 Year 0 cfs 0 cfs 0 cfs 0.7 cfs II Rate control is provided by the proposed NURP basins, which matches the existing I runoff flow rates to Sand Creek or discharges at lower rates. 2) Water Quality I The two basins will provide water quality treatment of the storm water runoff for the site. The basins are designed to meet the NURP standards presented in Table 17-B. TABLE 17-B NURP STANDARD DESIGN CRITERIA � ,3 �2"'n l� a s`3 . � tai $`__ .� .- R'1 1 !!Z !! Vegetation bench 10:1 10:1 10:1 Side slopes 3:1 3:1 3:1 I Skimmer Provide a skimmer 6" dia. orifice 6" dia. orifice volume Runoff volume from 2-1/2" 4.3 ac-ft 0.6 ac-ft I Permanent pool o required rain Proposed permanent pool I volume — 21.77 ac-ft 4.8 ac-ft Mean depth 3' to 4' 6.5' 4.4' I The proposed two NURP basins meet or exceed the standard NURP design standards. I A nutrient budget was performed to determine the impact on the water quality of the , , receiving waters, Sand Creek. The existing conditions and post-development conditions were analyzed for nutrient loadings using the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's guide - "Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas." An estimate of the yearly nutrient loadings generated by the existing conditions and proposed conditions is I presented in Table 17-C. I 14 1 I ITABLE 17-C ESTIMATE OF YEARLY NUTRIENT LOADINGS ZW- y.; ` ^fie .-T, € �i ci '' a >„x nt `$ a —7', I Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 3,345 lbs. 14,746 lbs. Total Phosphorous(TP) 6.8 lbs. 33.7 lbs. Total KjeldahlNitrogen (TKN) 40.1 lbs. 197 lbs. INitrate Nitrogen (N/N) 19.3 lbs. 90.61 lbs. The estimate of loadings indicates an approximate five time's increase in the amount I of nutrients generated in the proposed conditions. The NURP basin, acting alone, would remove enough of the total solids to match the existing conditions but not enough of the other nutrients. The addition of an irrigation system reduces the volume Iof runoff discharged to Sand Creek, which reduces the nutrient loading to the creek. The irrigation system will use an estimated 80 to 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated yearly by the proposed project, which reduces the nutrient loading by 80 to I100 percent. The runoff being discharged to Sand Creek flows through the basins. It will also receive NURP standard treatment, further reducing the nutrient loading to the creek. I The estimated nutrient budget to Sand Creek after treatment and irrigation 9removal of the storm water runoff is compared to the existing conditions nutrient loading in Table t 17-D. TABLE 17-D IYEARLY NUTRIENT BUDGET ESTIMATE Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 3,345 lbs. 80% - 100% 2,949 lbs. - 0 lbs. ITotal Phosphorous (TP) 6.8 lbs. 80% - 100% 6.7 lbs. - 0 lbs. Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) 40.1 lbs 80% - 100% 39.41 lbs. - 0 lbs. Nitrate Nitrogen (N/N) 19.3 lbs. 80% - 100% 18.1 lbs. - 0 lbs. IThe proposed storm water management plan will provide treatment to the surface runoff that limits the nutrient discharge to or below existing levels. I3) Erosion control and Best Management Practices In addition to the treatment of the storm water runoff by the NURP basins, source I control, best management and erosion control practices will be implemented. These measures will include: I a) Erosion control silt fence during grading construction. b) Temporary diversion ditches during grading construction. c) Temporary sedimentation basins at catch basins during grading construction. I d) Limit bituminous parking pavement and use gravel and grass surfaces to encourage infiltration. e) Grass surfaced parking will be maintained to encourage infiltration and reduce I runoff. f) Minimize parking lot slopes in gravel and grass areas to reduce erosion. I i5 I g) Temporary rock bed construction entrances will be installed to reduce the off-site ' transport of mud and sediment carried on tires by vehicle traffic. h) Revegetation of lawn and grass areas. i) Manage fertilizing at rates to reduce surface runoff and infiltration. I 4) Water Table and Bedrock Separation Based on the Ernest K. Lehmann & Associates, Inc.'s geotechnical report entitled, I"Geology and Ore Reserves of the Merriam Junction silica sand Deposit," Volume 1, 1980, the water table elevation below the proposed primary NURP basin ranges from 721 to 716 and below the secondary NURP basin from 714 to 712. This gives a I separation between the water table of eight feet to thirteen feet under the primary basin and thirteen feet to fifteen feet separation under the secondary basin. A three-foot layer of on-site topsoil, such as loamy sand to sandy loam will be used to I provide separation between the bottom of the NURP basins and the bedrock. This meets the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's standards for separation for on-site sewage treatment system as recommended in the Scott County Ground Water Protection Plan for areas that are highly susceptible to ground water contamination, as this site is. I 5) Irrigation System The proposed irrigation system will include NURP basin pumps, piping and sprinklers I such as "traveling guns" (see "Exhibit P"). Irrigation will be managed based on the water levels in the basins and the moisture needs of the grassed parking areas. The retention volume in the basins to be used for irrigation equals the runoff volume from a I 10-year frequency storm event (4.1 inches). It is estimated that this volume will be pumped out of the basin and the basin's full retention volume restored in two to three weeks. I. b. Identify routes=and diving water bodies for runoff from the ite; include or downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters.,Estimate impact runoff on the quality of receiving waters. The receiving body of water for runoff from the proposed project is DNR Wetland 210P I which flows into Sand Creek, then through Wetland 209P and eventually to the Minnesota River(see "Exhibit/s H & L"). I A proposed storm sewer will outfall at the edge, but outside of the Wetland Conservation Act delineation and DNR protected Wetland 210P, and includes a concrete flared end I section and riprap. The proposed onsite detention facilities keep the peak discharge rates low, under 7.0 cfs for a 100-year storm event, 1.2 cfs for a 10-year storm event and 0.7 cfs for a 2-year storm event. The riprap and a manhole junction just upstream ' of the outfall will provide the energy dissipation required to prevent erosion and scouring at the outfall. Since these flow rates match the existing discharge rates to Sand Creek, there will be no impact from the peak discharge flow rates on Sand Creek and I downstream receiving waters. 16 I 1 At certain times, the volume of outflow may exceed existing conditions, but the flow rate ' will remain low. The additional volume at 0.1 to 2.0 cfs for a long period will not have a detrimental impact on Sand Creek and the downstream waters and eventually to the Minnesota River. 1 18 . WateraQuatity-Wastewaters: Des i ourc , composition and:quantities of all sanitary municipal and industrialwasteNV ter.;produced.o .treated at the site. Seasonal facilities within Scott County have been allowed to utilize holding tanks for sewage management, since most other on-site sewage treatment options do not ' function well on a seasonal basis (see "Exhibit E"for rest room locations). The amphitheater activities will, at full capacity performances, generate nearly 60;000 gallons of domestic sewage. This sewage will be stored in on-site tanks, ' appropriately removed/pumped and transported to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Blue Lake treatment plant in Shakopee or other approved facility as needed. At average size events with 10,000 to 12,000 attendance, estimated sewage generation will be in the 30,000 to 36,000 gallon range. During non-event periods relatively small quantities of waste water will be generated by administrative and security staff. No other wastewaters will be produced. b. Describe ste treatment metbc is or po1lu#�on prevent ffc nd give estimates of man after.treatment .:Ideritif receiving waters,irtdu lir major downstream ' terbodies.and estirrlate the discharge impact on:the qualrt�r of mei wsterrs:-if the rnx l res on site sewage systems,discuss the suitab%lity of site cx ndltionr IC. 5.jcsystems• All sanitary sewage generated by the facility will be disposed of utilizing the storage tanks. There will be no discharges to local sewage systems or waterways. All ' wastewater will be transported to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Blue Lake treatment plant in Shakopee. Wastewaters treated at the Blue Lake facility are discharged to the Minnesota River. ' c. if wastes will'be discha ed into apublicly owned treatment°fa `I i the facility,:describe any.pretreatment provisions and discuss the abillbtto ' handle=the volume:and composition of wastes, identifying any improvements necessary. ' Wastes will be discharged via tanker truck to the Blue Lake treatment plant in Shakopee Minnesota. No pre-treatment is necessary; the only wastewater to be generated is domestic sewage. 1 17 d. If the project requires disposal of liquid animal manure,describe disposal technique andlocationand:discuss capacity to handle the volume and composition of manure. Identify any improvements necessary. Describe any required setbacks for land disposal systems. ' N/A 49. Geologic Hazards,and Soil:Conditions , a, Approximate depth (in`feet);to,groundwater: 18 feet minimum, 40 feet average; I to_bedrock; 0 feet minimurrt '15 feet average. Describe any of the followin9 9eologic site hazards to:mground water and also identify them f on the site map: sinkholes;shallow limestone formations orkarst conditions: Describe measures to avoid or minimizeeenvironmental problems due to any of these hazards. Geologic maps for Scott County (Scott County Geologic Atlas, 1982) do not indicate the presence of shallow limestone formations at the site (see "Exhibit K"). Although the Jordan East (USGS) quadrangle does not indicate the presence of karst topography or sinkholes at the site, quarry operations are indicated and low lying areas and swamps are located west of the site. The Scott County Geologic Atlas indicates that the site and surrounding areas are highly susceptible to ground water contamination due to the shallow, highly permeable cover over the bedrock aquifer (see "Exhibit J"). Project activities will be confined to the area east of the railroad tracks (see "Exhibit E"). I In addition, measures will be taken (see below) on site to prevent the possibility of spills and resulting contamination of the highly permeable sandstone aquifer. The depths to ground water and bedrock are estimates based on maps prepared for the original quarry operations by Ernest K. Lehmann and Associates Inc. According t to those maps, the phreatic surface elevation slopes from 723 feet MSL at the eastern edge of the site, to 712 feet MSL at the western edge. The Scott County Soil Conservation Service Soils Survey map shows that seven soils within the approximate 112 acres, primarily consists of Sparta (formerly called Hubbard)fine sands (HdA, HdB & HdC; 0-12 percent slopes) and sandstone outcrops on the southern end of the site (see "Exhibit F"). The proposed site is located in the southern region of the Twin City basin, with I underlying bedrock units generally dipping to the north (see "Exhibit K"). Several bedrock valleys are also present in the vicinity of the site. These valleys (along the East Side and south of the site)were formed by stream erosion and subsequently filled with glacial drift during periods of glaciation, resulting in the relatively flat landscape in the Scott County area. The glacial drift typically consists of sand, gravel and clay. The site is underlain by several bedrock aquifer systems, including, from shallowest to deepest, the Jordan, Reno Member of the Franconia Formation, Ironton-Galesville, and Mt. Simon-Hinckley. In addition to the bedrock aquifers, sand layers in the glacial drift are used as a source of water supply by some residents in the vicinity of 18 1 ' the site. The Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer is the most extensively used aquifer in the Twin Cities area. The Prairie du Chien dolomitic limestone element of this aquifer has been eroded in this part of Scott County. The Jordan sandstone is exposed in the southern end of the project site and is overlain by less than 50 feet of soil cover throughout the remainder of the site (see "Exhibit K"). ' Geologic maps of Scott County indicate that bedrock valleys in the vicinity of the site extend into the Ironton-Galesville aquifer, thus the Ironton-Galesville and Reno Member of the Franconia Formation aquifer systems could be hydraulically ' connected to surficial aquifer systems in this area. Hydraulic connection between these aquifer systems is dependent on the hydrogeologic characteristics of the glacial drift in the bedrock valleys, which varies in composition from clay to sand and gravel. ' Depths to ground water are expected to be shallow in the vicinity of the site, due to its location, with respect to Sand Creek, the Louisville Swamp, the Minnesota River and associated swamps located west of the site. Similarly, depths to bedrock are ' expected to be shallow at the site, as evidenced by Soil Conservation Service (SCS) maps and previous quarry operations. Increased depths to bedrock can be expected along the East Side of the site and south of the site in the vicinity of the bedrock ' valleys. The project site is located in an area that has been described by the Minnesota ' Geological Survey as highly susceptible to ground water contamination (see "Exhibit J"). The 1980 Barr Engineering report indicated surficial ground water discharges to Sand Creek and the Minnesota River, as evidenced by numerous springs west of the site. b. .Describe ae,soWon the site,giving NRCS(SCS)classifications, ifknown. Miscuss soil granularity Andpotential for ground;water contaminatiortfrom:wastes or ' chemicals spread or spilled onto the soils. Discuss any mitigation-measures to prevent such contamination. The 1959 Scott County Soil Conservation Service Soils Survey map and the "1997 Soil Survey of Scott County, Minnesota Advanced Manuscript Part Two" shows seven soil types within the approximate 112 acres. The soils primarily consist of ' Sparta fine sands (0 to 12 percent slopes) and sandstone outcrops on the southern end of the site (see "Exhibit F"). ' In addition, SCS maps for Scott County indicates mine and quarry operations in the vicinity of the sandstone outcrops, which are identified as "SS_G." Sparta (Hubbard) soils are typically dark-colored soils, which developed on sandy terraces along streams. Wind erosion is usually present when these soils are not protected by vegetation. Topography in these areas can range from nearly flat to undulating. Sandstone-bedrock is also exposed as outcrops in some areas at the site resulting in ' areas that can range from nearly level to steep. 1 ' 19 20. Solid Wastes;°Hazardous Wastes; Storage Tanks: a Describe the types, amounts and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes to be generated,.including solid animal manure, sludge and ash produced during construction and operation. identify.the method and location of disposal. For. I projects generating municipal.solid waste, iindicate if there is a source separaton plan, describehow'##ie project wilt be mod`fiied.for:recycling. if hazardous waste is generated, indicate if there is a hazardous waste minimization plan and routine I hazardous wastereduction assessments. Events are anticipated to generate approximately five tons of solid waste, from food and containers, when at full capacity attendance. Correspondingly lesser amounts would be generated at lower attendance levels. Current plans would not allow attendees to bring in food or beverages to events. Local waste disposal companies ' will be contracted to haul to licensed solid waste facilities. Efforts will be made to develop a recycling program for packing and paper. As other recycling technologies become available, other wastes will be considered for recycling. During non-event periods, a small quantity of normal office/domestic waste will be produced at the site. Any additional wastes (e.g. paint containers)will be disposed of in accordance with Scott County Solid and Hazardous Waste Ordinances. b.' Identify ani toxic or hazardous materials=to beus e i.:or present at:t a site and identify measures to be used to prevent them fromrc c ntaminating„ground.water. lf:the useof toxic or hazardous materials will lead to a regulated waste Edisc arge or emission, discuss any alternatives considered to minimize or elimin ,the waste, discharge.or 1 emissions No potentially hazardous substances are anticipated to be stored on the site. Lawn care will be contracted to a professional landscape maintenance company. c. Indicate the number, location, size and use of any above or.:°below ground.tanks':to be used for�storage of.petroleum products or other material;(except water). I Underground tanks will be installed southwest of the amphitheater facility to store domestic sewage generated from the restroom and food facilities. These tanks are indicated on "Exhibit E", Site Plan. Combined tank sizes will be in excess of 100,000 gallons. This will allow for two back to back near capacity performances before emptying the tanks would be necessary. , 21. Traffic: Parking spaces added: 6540* Existing space(If project Inva vas tsior)Y N/A. Estimated total average daily traffic generated: see below Estimated maximuveten m hour traffic generated (if known)and time of occurrence: see below . Provide-an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on affected roads and,describe.any-traffic improvements necessary. If the project is within the Twin Cities metropolitan area,discuss its;impact onthe regional transportation sys#em. Parking Spaces added: The development will have a total of approximately 6,540 parking I spaces. A bituminous surface for approximately 250 of the parking spaces will be provided for handicap and VIP parking. The remainder of the spaces would be divided between a gravel surface and a grass surface (see"Exhibit H"). 20 , ' Existing spaces (if project involves expansion): Not applicable. Estimated Average Daily Traffic (ADT) generated: The estimated ADT will vary depending upon the time of year and the event attendance. In ' order to establish the estimated ADT, information was gathered from other amphitheater venues across the country of similar size to the proposed amphitheater. From this information, the following operational assumptions were determined: ' • Amphitheater events would be scheduled primarily during the period between Memorial Day and Labor Day. • During this season, approximately 30 events would be held at the amphitheater. ' • Attendance at these events would range from a low attendance of a couple thousand persons to the maximum capacity of 19,250. • The average vehicle occupancy of customers attending events is expected to be 3.0 people per vehicle. Based on the above information, the ADT was estimated for three different scenarios; an ' off-season day, an in-season non-event day and an in-season event day. The in-season event day was also divided into three parts to reflect the different attendance levels. The following attendance levels were used for forecast and analysis purposes: ' • The 10,000 attendance level represents the average attendance level for an event. Approximately 15 shows per season would be at or above this level and 15 shows below this level. ' • The 18,000 attendance level represents the 85th percentile event. Approximately four events per season are expected to be at or above this level and 26 events below this level. • The 19,250 attendance level represents the maximum capacity of the proposed amphitheater. Two or three events per season are expected to be at this level. ' Added to this traffic was a small amount (150 vehicles) of miscellaneous traffic to account for trips such as drop off/pick up, arriving at the site without tickets and arriving at the site with the intention to sell event tickets. This accounted for all customer traffic attending an ' event. In addition to these vehicles from customers attending events, traffic is generated from other sources. The following sources were also considered for estimating the ADT during all three scenarios and attendance levels: • Full and part-time employee vehicles. • Band member and support staff and equipment vehicles. • Sanitation and delivery vehicles. ' • Police and State Patrol vehicles. Using information from these sources and the customer traffic established previously, the ADT ' for the various scenarios and attendance levels is presented below. owivivioeheiitio Off-season ' p )20 In-season non-event day. 50 ' In-season event day: • average capacity event (10,000 attendance) 6,967 • 85th percentile capacity event(18,000 attendance) 12,300 ' • maximum capacity event (19,250 attendance) 13,133 ' 21 In the case of maximum capacity, a standard procedure will be established in order to inform the public of the sold-out event(such as newspaper, radio and television public announcements). This will reduce the amount of vehicles from motorists who arrive to the site without a ticket and then must turn around. Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated (if known) and time of occurrence: To effectively address peak hour traffic implications, the three attendance levels representing I the average, 85th percentile and maximum capacity events (stated above)were examined. The peak hour was determined from the following: I• Friday and Saturday were the nights chosen to be examined based upon traffic counts taken at nearby intersections during the early fall period. The counts were higher at this time due to recreational travel leaving for the weekend and additional traffic generated by I the Renaissance Festival. • The peak hour was determined to be the hour before an event would start. Assuming an event begins about 7:30 p.m., the peak hour of entry would be from 6:30 to 7:30 p.m. The I peak hour of entry was chosen over the peak hour of exiting due to higher background traffic on the main roads. • From the information obtained on other amphitheater venues, approximately 60 percent of the customers were found to arrive to the site during the peak hour of entry. Based upon the information above, the peak hour trip generation for each of the three attendance levels was determined. The average event with an attendance of 10,000 is expected to generate 2,000 peak hour trip ends during the peak hour of entry. The 85th percentile event with an attendance of approximately 18,000 is expected to generate 3,600 trip, ends during the peak hour of entry. The maximum capacity event with an attendance of 19,250 is expected to generate 3,850 vehicles during the peak hour of entry. Provide an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. If the project is within the Twin Cities metropolitan area, discuss its impact on the regional transportation system: FRAMEWORK FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS All the analyses focused on a busy time period, the arrival period on Friday and Saturday I nights during the early fall season. This period includes recreational traffic leaving the Twin Cities for the weekend as well as traffic from the Renaissance Festival. Concerts held at lower traffic time periods, such as weekends without the Renaissance Festival or weekdays, would experience lower traffic volumes and better level of service results. As stated before, an average of about 30 events per season is expected to occur at the amphitheater. Of those, the 10,000 attendance represents the average event, which means about 15 would have higher attendance and about 15 events would have lower attendance. About four would be expected to reach 18,000 or higher attendance, of which two or three are expected to draw a maximum capacity crowd. , The purpose of the transportation analysis is to assess the traffic implications of the proposed amphitheater project. In order to accomplish this, the following parameters were used for the traffic analysis. • The amphitheater is assumed to be fully operational in the year 2001. • The traffic analysis focused on the year 2002, the first full year of operation. • The traffic analysis also examined the traffic conditions in the year 2020. 22 1 • A background growth factor of 3.0 percent per year was applied to current volumes in order to estimate volumes that would occur in 2002 and 2020 without the amphitheater. • Trip distribution to the site was split into six different routes for approaching traffic. For the ' purposes of this report, TH 169 is considered a north/south roadway with all intersecting roadways running east/west. This allows for consistency in descriptions despite the fact that the exact direction of TH 169 may vary depending on the intersection. • 5% for traffic approaching the site from the south on TH 169. • 65% for traffic approaching the site from the north on TH•169. • 10% for traffic approaching the site from the west on TH 41. ' • 10% for traffic approaching the site from the east on CR 14. • 9% for traffic approaching the site from the west on CR 69. • 1% for traffic approaching the site from the east on CR 78. • Five intersections were chosen for analysis: • TH 169 and CR 69. • TH 169 and TH 41/CR 78. • TH 169 and CR 14. • TH 169 and VIP access drive. • TH 169 and Bluff Drive. ' In order to better understand how the intersections operate from an overall traffic capacity standpoint, capacity analyses were performed using the methodology presented in the Highway Capacity U Manual. Capacity analyses determine how well or poorly an intersection is operating. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service, which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection and ranges from an A to an F letter grade. ' Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average ' delay per vehicle would be approximately ten seconds or less. Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some ' influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. ' Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and ' convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. ' Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 ' to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. For most agencies in the Twin Cities area, level of service D represents the minimal acceptable level of service for regular daily operations. ' Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. 23 Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the I intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include: long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. Capacity analyses were performed for the intersections with the following scenarios; 1998 existing conditions, 2002 no build condition, 2002 with a 10,000 attendance event, 2002 with an 18,000 attendance event, 2002 with a 19,250 attendance event, 2020 no build condition and 2020 with a 19,250 attendance event. The 1998 existing volumes represent intersection turn movement counts recorded at the intersections during the early fall season. Early fall is a busy time for traffic due to weekend trips leaving the area and traffic from the Renaissance Festival. The 2002 No Build scenario applies the growth factor to the 1998 counts to project volume levels in the year 2002 from non-specific growth in the area. The 2020 No Build scenario applies the growth factor to the 1998 , counts to projected volume levels in the year 2020 from non-specific growth in the area. These scenarios were examined on both the Friday and Saturday peak hour(6:30 to 7:30pm). Tables presenting the traffic movement volumes for each intersection and scenario are shown below. Tables 21-1 and 21-2 below provide summaries of all the level of service results for the five key ' intersections during the Friday and Saturday arrival peak hour. Each intersection is discussed in detail following these tables. TABLE 21-1 I LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS DURING THE ARRIVAL PEAK HOUR 6:30 to 7:30 • m. ON FRIDAY EVENING -2M:7;;°- 10,000 §,a A 10,000 18,000 19,250 19,250 Intersection- Existing No Build Attendance Attendance Attendance No Build Attendance I TH169&CR69 Base Conditions*(1) C C F F F E F Candidate Improvements*(2) N/A N/A E F F N/A N/A TH 169&TH41 Base Conditions*(1) D D F F F N/A N/A Mn/DOT Changes*(3) N/A C F F F E F Candidate Improvements*(2) N/A N/A E F F N/A N/A I TH169&CR 14 Base Conditions*(4) C C F F F F F Candidate Improvements*(2) N/A N/A D F F N/A N/A TH 169&VIP Access Base Conditions*(4) C C N/A N/A N/A F N/A Candidate Improvements*(2) N/A N/A B F F N/A F TH 169&Bluff Drive I Base Conditions*(4) C C N/A N/A N/A F N/A Candidate Improvements*(2) N/A N/A A B B N/A B *(1)Signalized intersection where level of service refers to the entire intersection. I*(2)Refers to mitigative measures taken to alleviate problems identified. Discussed in detail in each intersection discussion. *(3)Refers to specific programmed intersection changes intended by Mn/DOT. *(4)Unsignalized intersection where level of service is representative of the left turn movements off of TH 169 and movements ' from the side streets. N/A—Not Applicable 24 , I 1 I TABLE 21-2 LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS DURING THE ARRIVAL PEAK HOUR 6:30 to 7:30 •.m. ON SATURDAY EVENING 10,000 18,000 19,250 19,250 Intersection- Existing No Build Attendance Attendance Attendance No Build Attendance TH 169&'CR 69 IBase Conditions*(1) C C D F F F F Candidate Improvements*(2 N/A N/A B F F N/A N/A TH 169&TH 41 Base Conditions*(1) D E F F F N/A N/A Mn/DOT Changes*(3) N/A D F F F F F Candidate Improvements*(2 N/A N/A E F F N/A N/A l TH169&CR14 Base Conditions*(4) C C F F F F F Candidate Improvements*(2 N/A N/A C F F N/A N/A I TH 169&VIP Access Base Conditions*(4) C C N/A N/A N/A D N/A Candidate Improvements*(2 N/A N/A A F F N/A F TH 169&Bluff Drive IBase Conditions*(4) C C N/A N/A N/A E N/A Candidate Improvements*(2 N/A N/A A B B N/A B *(1)Signalized intersection where level of service refers to the entire intersection. I *(2)Refers to mitigative measures taken to alleviate problems identified. Discussed in detail in each intersection discussion. *(3)Refers to specific programmed intersection changes intended by Mn/DOT. *(4)Unsignalized intersection where level of service is representative of the left turn movements off of TH 169 and movements I from the side streets. N/A—Not Applicable I ANALYSES OF FIVE KEY INTERSECTIONS TH 169 and CR 69 are a signalized intersection with a fully actuated traffic signal, which allocates the green time in accordance with traffic demand. The south approach on TH 169 has two left turn lanes, I two through lanes and one right turn lane. The north approach consists of one left turn lane, two through lanes and one right turn lane. The east approach on CR 69 has one left turn lane, two through lanes and one right turn lane. The west approach on CR 69 consists of one left turn lane, Itwo through lanes and one channelized right turn lane. For the TH 169 approaches, the signal provides green light time for protected left turn movements I followed by green light time for through and right turn movements. The same two phases, protected left followed by through and right turn movements, are also provided for the approaches on CR 69. The analysis was first performed using this signal timing for the four scenarios. Level of service I difficulties were identified for both the Friday and Saturday evening scenarios. In an attempt to mitigate these difficulties, analyses were performed for a condition that involved use of police officers to increase the operational efficiency of the intersection. This may be achieved through one of two I ways; manual operation of the signal through push-button control or turning the signal off and directly controlling the intersection. Table 21-3 summarizes the analysis results. I I 25 TABLE 21-3 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) RESULTS DURING THE ARRIVAL PEAK HOUR (6:30 to 7:30p.m.) FOR THE INTERSECTION AND OF TH 169CR 69 Current Characteristics 1998 Existing 2002 No Build C C 2002 — 10,000 Attendance F D 2002— 18,000 Attendance F F 2002— 19,250 Attendance F F Push Button or Direct Officer Control at the intersections of TH 169 and CR 69 2002— 10,000 Attendance E B 2002— 18,000 Attendance F F 2002— 19,250 Attendance For the 10,000 attendance level, officer control would generally allow motorists to clear through the intersection on the first green phase on both Friday and Saturday evenings. For an 18,000 and 19,250 attendance event, the level of service F means that most motorists would experience considerable delay during the peak hour. Motorists travelling in different directions would generally experience the same amount of delay because officer control would attempt to equalize all movement delays. Thus, during the peak hour, most motorists on TH 169 and CR 69 would have to wait three or' four minutes before being able to travel through the intersection. Slightly less delay would be experienced with an 18,000 attendance event than with a maximum capacity event. This intersection was also examined in the year 2020 under no build and maximum capacity conditions using existing characteristics. During the Friday evening peak hour of arrival, this intersection is expected to operate at a level of service E under 2020 No Build conditions and a level I of service F under 2020, 19,250 Attendance conditions. During the Saturday evening peak hour arrival, this intersection is expected to operate at a level of service F for both the 2020 No Build and ' 2020, 19,250 Attendance conditions. The low levels of service during the 2020 No Build conditions suggest that this intersection may need upgrading in the future due to normal growth in the area. TH 169 and TH 41/CR 78 is also a fully actuated signalized intersection. Both the north and south I approaches have one left turn lane, two through lanes and one channelized right turn lane. The west approach on TH 41 consists of one left turn/through lane and one channelized right turn lane. The 111 east approach on CR 78 consists of one left turn/through lane and one right turn lane. Current phasing has separate green light times for movements from the west followed by movements from the east, commonly called a split phase. The left turns on TH 169 have a protected phase followed I by the through movements. The first analysis was run using these geometrics and phases. As with the previous intersection, level of service difficulties were determined. This intersection is included in Mn/DOT's current upgrade program. In the year 2002, the eastbound approach on TH 41 is expected' to be provided with two left turn lanes, one through lane and one channelized right turn lane. The westbound approach is expected to be provided with one left turn lane, one through lane and one right turn lane. No changes are expected on TH 169. Using these intersection geometrics, the operation of the intersection was improved, but difficulties were identified. A final option was examined that included officer control at this intersection —either through direct control or push-button control. The results of all these options are summarized in Table 21-4. I 26 I I I TABLE 21-4 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) RESULTS DURING THE ARRIVAL PEAK HOUR (6:30 to 7:30p.m.) FOR THE INTERSECTION I OF TH 169 AND TH 41/CR 78 .:', E ES'$': t4 ,. ���. "a:.. � `�' _=oi Current Geometrics and Phasing 1998 Existing D D I 2002 No Build D D 2002—10,000 Attendance F F 2002— 18,000 Attendance F F I 2002—19,250 Attendance F F Mn/DOT's Programmed Changes 2002 No Build D C I 2002—10,000 Attendance F F 2002—18,000 Attendance F F 2002—19,250 Attendance F F Push Button or Direct Officer Control at the I Intersection of TH 169 and TH 41 2002—10,000 Attendance E E 2002—18,000 Attendance F F I2002—19,250 Attendance F F Similar to the situation at TH 169 and CR 69, the level of service F will mean considerable delay for I vehicles at this intersection. Under this condition, motorists on TH 169 and TH 41/CR78 would often need to wait three or four minutes before proceeding through the intersection. The programmed changes by Mn/DOT will improve the traffic operations of the intersection, especially during the ISaturday evening period with Renaissance Festival traffic. Under 2020 No Build conditions, which assume the Mn/DOT changes will be in-place at this time, the I Friday evening peak hour of arrival is expected to operate at a level of service E. Under 2020 19,250 Attendance conditions, this intersection is expected to operate at a level of service F. During the Saturday evening peak hour of arrival, the 2020 No Build and the 2020 19,250 attendance conditions I are both expected to operate at a level of service F. The low level of service expected under 2020 No Build conditions suggests that future additional changes at this intersection may be needed to accommodate expected future general growth in the area even without the amphitheater. ITH 169 and CR 14 is an unsignalized intersection with stop sign control on CR 14. The north and south approaches on TH 169 consist of one left turn lane, two through lanes and one right turn lane. IThe east and west approaches on CR 14 provide one lane for all movements. An analysis was first run using these geometrics with stop sign control for the four scenarios. Level of service difficulties were identified for both days under those conditions. In an attempt to alleviate these difficulties, the Iintersection was examined with officer control. The results of these analyses are presented in Table 21-5. Under current characteristics, the level of service results are representative of the left turn Imovements off of TH 169 and movements from the side streets (CR14). Other movements are unimpeded by two-way stop sign control. Under officer control, any movement could be stopped by the officer controlling the intersection. Therefore, the level of service results are for the entire I intersection. 27 TABLE 21-5 ' LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) RESULTS DURING THE ARRIVAL PEAK HOUR (6:30 to 7:30p.m.) FOR THE INTERSECTION OF TH 169 AND CR 14 413',44z 7Ati Current Characteristics 1998 Existing 2002 No Build C C 2002— 10,000 Attendance F F 2002— 18,000 Attendance F F 2002— 19,250 Attendance F F Officer Control 2002— 10,000 Attendance D C 2002 — 18,000 Attendance 2002— 19,250 Attendance F F Under current characteristics with stop sign control on CR 14, level of service F means a IIconsiderable delay of several minutes would be experienced by motorists on CR 14 and motorists turning left off TH 169. Under officer control, the level of service results pertain to all movements through the intersection. Similar to the previous intersections, vehicles may be delayed three or four I minutes before being able to proceed through the intersection. This intersection was also examined in the year 2020 using the current unsignalized geometrics. ' With these characteristics, both the Friday and Saturday evening peak hours of arrival, under both 2020 No Build and 2020, 19,250 Attendance conditions, are expected to operate at a level of service F with considerable delay for motorists at this intersection. This low level of service suggests that this, unsignalized intersection may need improvements due to the general growth of traffic in this area. TH 169 and the VIP access drive is an unsignalized intersection with stop sign control on the site access drive. The south approach on TH 169 provides one left turn/through lane and one through/right turn lane. The north approach on TH 169 consists of one left turn/through lane and one through/right turn lane. The VIP access drive provides one lane for all movements on the west I approach. A field access drive is opposite the VIP access drive and also consists of one lane for all movements on the east approach. This field access has very little traffic use. These current characteristics were used to analyze the 1998 and 2002 no build scenarios. For the post- I development scenarios, the VIP access is expected to serve only VIP and handicap motorists during the entering period. When events are finished, general motorists may be allowed to use this driveway for exiting after preference has been given to VIP and handicap users. A left turn lane will be needed' on the south approach of TH 169 and a right turn lane will be needed on the north approach of TH 169. The VIP access driveway would also be expanded to three lanes, one permanent lane for each direction and one reversible lane in the middle. During the peak hours of entry before an event, this would allow two inbound lanes for entering traffic. Traffic cones could separate the inbound right and , left turns into separate lanes. This would allow the turns to proceed simultaneously without conflicts. The middle lane could then be reversed to an outbound lane for exiting traffic after an event. The intersection would need to have officer traffic control during the peak entering and exiting periods. The results of the analysis are summarized in Table 21-6. Similar to the previous unsignalized intersection, through and right turn movements on TH 169 are unimpeded under current stop sign control. Level of service results presented for the current characteristics are for the VIP access and ' field access movements and the left turns on TH 169. Level of service under officer control with new geometrics are results for the entire intersection. ' 28 1 ' TABLE 21-6 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) RESULTS DURING THE ARRIVAL PEAK HOUR (6:30 to 7:30p.m.) FOR THE INTERSECTION OF TH 169 AND VIP ACCESS DRIVE ;17774':ZaiW!:eattgpri Current Characteristics 1998 Existing C C 2002 No Build C C Officer Control &New Geometrics 2002— 10,000 Attendance B A ' 2002— 18,000 Attendance F F 2002— 19,250 Attendance F F Under officer control, it is important to note that high quality traffic operations will be provided for events at the 10,000 attendance level. For the others, level of service F means that all movements, except right turns onto and off of TH 169, would experience considerable delays. Both the 18,000 and 19,250 attendance scenarios were examined assuming that the minor movements (left turns from TH 169 and exiting movements [right turn only]from the VIP access drive)would be allowed time to proceed about once every four minutes. This results in delay for the through movement on TH 169 and the low level of service for the entire intersection. Mitigative measures will be examined in the traffic management plan to reduce these delays. ' This intersection was also examined in the year 2020 using the existing unsignalized characteristics for the 2020 No Build scenario and assuming officer control for the 2020, 19,250 attendance conditions. During the Friday peak hour of arrival, the 2020 No Build is expected to ' operate at a level of service D and a level of service F under 2020, 19,250 attendance conditions. TH 169 and Bluff Drive is also an unsignalized intersection with stop sign control on Bluff Drive. ' Current geometrics provide one left turn lane, one through lane and one through/right turn lane for the south approach on TH 169. The north approach consists of one left turn lane, two through lanes and one right turn lane. Both the east and west approaches on Bluff Drive provide one lane for all movements. The 1998 and 2002 No Build scenarios were analyzed with these characteristics. The development scenarios were examined with officer control and an additional right turn lane on southbound TH 169. Bluff Drive, west of TH 169, needs to be expanded from two to four lanes. For the peak period of entering traffic, three inbound lanes would be provided. This would allow each incoming lane from TH 169 (two right turn lanes and one left turn lane) to be serviced by a separate lane for simultaneous flow without conflicts. For the peak period of exiting ' traffic, it is expected that three lanes would be provided —two for left turns to the north on TH 169 and one for right turn movements. No through movements would be allowed onto Bluff Drive. The results of the analysis are presented in Table 21-7. Level of service results for the current ' characteristics are for movements on Bluff Drive and the traffic on TH 169 turning left. Other movements are unimpeded by this type of intersection control. Results under officer control and new geometrics are for the entire intersection. 1 29 1 TABLE 21-7 , LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) RESULTS DURING THE ARRIVAL PEAK HOUR (6:30 to 7:30p.m.) FOR THE INTERSECTION OF TH 169 AND BLUFF DRIVE �' q � �casaTp,t � ;lac* ' ,,,.�;�:� � � �^ :�. .,�f...: z. � �. .pea ,... �r. � ��� t�r.. .. .� i R .w e J:1. Current Characteristics 1998 Existing 2002 No Build C C Officer Control and New Geometries 2002— 10,000 Attendance A A 2002— 18,000 Attendance B B 2002— 19,250 Attendance B B There is a potential for queues and stacking on Bluff Drive into the site and on the turn lanes on TH 169. These items are discussed in a later section, titled "Queue Lengths and Stacking." At the intersection of Bluff Drive and the parking lot access drive, traffic cones as well as officer control during the peak hours of entering and exiting will be needed to help guide people into the correct lane and provide smooth traffic operation. Between the lot access and TH 169, Bluff Drive 1 would have four lanes, as described previously. West of the lot access, Bluff Drive would decrease to two lanes (the current geometrics), one lane in each direction. The TH 169 and Bluff Drive intersection was also examined with 2020 projected volumes. Current I unsignalized characteristics were used for the 2020 No Build conditions and officer control was assumed for the 2020, 19,250 attendance condition. During the Friday evening peak hour of arrival, the 2020 No Build condition is expected to operate at a level of service E and a level of service B during the 2020, 19,250 attendance condition. During the Saturday evening peak hour arrival, the 2020 No Build condition is expected to operate at a level of service F and the 2020, 19,250 I attendance condition is expected to operate at a level of service B. It is important to note this high level of service expected occurs while under officer control. TRAFFIC RESULTS AND MITIGATIVE MEASURES , All the analyses focused on the arrival period on Friday and Saturday nights during the early fall season, a busy time period that includes weekend recreational traffic and Renaissance Festival I traffic. Events staged during weekdays or on weekends without the Renaissance Festival would experience lower traffic volumes and better level of service results. This amphitheater is expected to operate similarly to other venues across the country, averaging about 30 events per season. The ' average event is expected to have an attendance of about 10,000, meaning about 15 events would have a higher attendance and about 15 events would have a lower attendance. About four out of the 30 events per season would be expected to have an attendance of 18,000 or more. Of those 1 four, two or three would be expected to reach the maximum capacity of 19,250. The 10,000 attendance level can be adequately accommodated with the following mitigative ' measures: • The TH 169/CR 69 intersection and the TH 169/TH 41 intersection would require a more efficient manner of operation during the peak hour. This could be accomplished by police ' officers manually controlling the signal through push-button control or turning off the signal and directly controlling the intersection. 30 1 1 • Officer control at the intersections of TH 169/CR 14, TH 169NIP access drive, TH 169/Bluff Drive and Bluff Drive/parking lot access drive (in addition to the intersections of TH 169 with CR 69 and TH 41), as mentioned above in the first bullet point. • The addition of one southbound right turn lane and one northbound left turn lane at the intersection of TH 169/VIP access drive. The access drive would need an additional lane for a total of three lanes, one permanent lane in each direction with a reversible lane in the middle. ' • The addition of a right turn lane for southbound TH 169 (a total of two would then be provided) for entering traffic at the intersection of TH 169/Bluff Drive. • Bluff Drive, between TH 169 and the parking lot access drive, would require two additional ' lanes to provide a total of four lanes. During the peak period of entering traffic, the two northern lanes would become inbound lanes from TH 169. This would provide three lanes for inbound traffic. During the peak period of exiting traffic, all four lanes would again be in use. ' The northern lane would service inbound traffic and the three southern lanes would service outbound traffic to TH 169. At the 18,000 and 19,250 attendance levels, considerable traffic delays would be experienced at key approach intersections. Attendance levels would be at or above 18,000 about four times per year, with the maximum capacity of 19,250 reached two or three times. To further mitigate traffic delays that would be experienced on these occasions, one or more of the following measures can be implemented: • Attempting to schedule near-capacity and capacity events at times when background traffic is lower. • Using buses to transport a significant number of customers. • Distribution of public information encouraging customers to arrive early to spread out the arrival time. • Joint promotions with other nearby entertainment venues for park and ride operations. ' Using 2020 projected volumes, the level of service for all key intersections are significantly reduced at the base condition. This suggests that these roadways may experience problems during the peak hours of arrival due to normal traffic growth expected in this area regardless of amphitheater ' traffic. This further suggests that improvements may be needed at some future point to mitigate these problems. However, such general improvements may or may not effectively reduce delays during amphitheater events. ' POST-EVENT CONDITIONS Although the peak hour of arrival traffic is expected to have the most traffic implications, the peak hour of exiting traffic, the hour immediately following the end of an event, was also examined. At this later hour, background traffic on TH 169 is approximately 60 percent less than the peak hour of arrival on Friday evenings and approximately 45 percent less on Saturday evenings creating fewer • ' conflicts in traffic operations. Exiting traffic is expected to use the same routes, in the opposite direction, as when travelling to the site, with most traffic heading to the north from the site. The greatest concentration of traffic will be experienced at the two site access points, where officer control will facilitate movements. While keeping traffic operations on TH 169 moving in an efficient manner, the parking lot is expected to empty in about 40 minutes for a maximum capacity event. Events with less attendance would be expected to empty faster. As most traffic travels to the fnorth, motorists heading east on CR 14 will have an easy right turn and will not experience much delay. Motorists turning left onto TH 41 will experience some delay while waiting for protected green time for that movement. Similarly, motorists turning left onto CR 69 will also experience some delay while waiting for protected green time. The traffic management plan will discuss the 31 exiting operations in greater detail and specific methods to insure adequate traffic movements on the roadway system. RAILROAD OPERATIONS Located west of TH 169 is a railroad track that runs parallel to TH 169. This track crosses both the VIP/handicap entrance to the amphitheater and Bluff Drive. From information provided by the railroad, this track is currently used twice per day—one southbound train during the a.m. hours and one northbound train during the p.m. hours. The train traffic does not have a set schedule. Although the a.m. train would not pose a problem to amphitheater operations, the p.m. train could cause back-ups in traffic if it arrives during the peak hours of entering or exiting. Currently, this train I generally consists of five cars and travels at about 30 miles per hour. Given current advance warning time and the length and speed of these trains, a train would be expected to block each crossing for about 40 seconds. Rail traffic potentially could increase, although there are no plans by the railroad to increase usage in the near future. The exact details of the crossing design and traffic operations will be provided in the traffic management plan. QUEUE LENGTHS AND STACKING The potential for queuing of vehicles increases as the attendance of an event increases. Queuing is a function of the arrival rate for vehicles and the processing rate at the traffic entrances to the I amphitheater. If the processing rate is less than the arrival rate for any significant length of time, a large queue of vehicles could form at the Bluff Drive entrance and, potentially, on TH 169. To achieve a sufficiently high processing rate, careful attention will be given to both the site traffic design and the site traffic management plan. Specific measures that will be addressed include: • Avoiding the need to stop vehicles for the purpose of collecting a parking fee or selling event tickets. • Providing sufficient entrance lanes. • Establishing and implementing a comprehensive traffic management plan that includes effective provisions for signs, markings, parking lot attendants and traffic control officers. • Designing the site entrances to provide significant queuing space on site in order to minimize queuing on TH 169. TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN A specific traffic management plan will need to be developed for the purpose of managing traffic operations during the arrival and departure periods for amphitheater traffic. This plan will be developed through close coordination with staff from Mn/DOT, State Highway Patrol, County Public Works County Sheriffs Department and with Township officials. Some specific items to be addressed in the traffic management plan include: traffic signing and markings, advance warning of I intersection control on TH 169, lighting of the controlled intersections, policy for officer control of the intersections and management of the parking lot by attendants. The plan will address overall strategies that pertain to all sizes of events and will present a series of sub-plans by size of event I that document specific operational measures to be applied for each particular size of event. The traffic management plan will be dynamic and adjustable based on the changing needs of the I amphitheater events and roadways. In the long term, base traffic volumes will continue to increase as more development occurs in the area. As volume patterns continue to change over time, the I roadways impacted by the amphitheater will need to be monitored. Through the monitoring of the roadways, the traffic management plan can be refined to account for future changes. 32 I ITABLE 21-8 TURN MOVEMENTS AT KEY INTERSECTIONS FOR THE FRIDAY PM PEAK HOUR OF ARRIVAL FOR AMPHITHEATER EVENTS - 2002 ANALYSIS I L I R L T R L T R L TR 1998 Existing 272 598 1 8 823 49 49 24 389 4 21 9 I 2002 No Build 2002 Scenario 1 307 676 1 9 930 55 55 27 440 5 24 10 307 676 1 9 2,230 55 55 27 620 5 24 10 2002 Scenario 2 307 676 1 9 3,270 55 55 27 764 5 24 10 1 2002 Scenario 3 307 676 1 9 3,432 55 55 27 786 5 24 10 L T R L T R L T R L T R I 1998 Existing 132 595 30 21 793 260 226 95 165 37 66 26 2002 No Build 149 672 34 24 896 294 255 107 186 42 75 29 2002 Scenario 1 149 672 34 24 2,376 294 255 107 386 62 75 29 2002 Scenario 2 149 672 34 24 3,560 294 255 107 546 78 75 29 I2002 Scenario 3 149 672 34 24 3,745 294 255 107 571 80 75 29 L T R L T R L T R L T R I 1998 Existing 0 688 24 10 945 2 3 0 1 21 0 14 2002 No Build 0 777 27 11 1,068 2 3 0 1 24 0 16 2002 Scenario 1 0 777 27 11 2,768 2 3 0 1 224 0 16 I 2002 Scenario 2 0 777 27 11 4,128 2 3 0 1 384 0 16 2002 Scenario 3 0 777 27 11 4,340 2 3 0 1 409 0 16 IL 1998Existing T R L T R L T R L T R 10 712 10 10 967 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 2002 No Build 10 805 10 10 1,093 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 I 2002 Scenario 1 2002 Scenario 2 21 805 10 10 2,779 224 10 0 10 10 0 10 21 805 10 10 4,299 224 10 0 10 10 0 10 2002 Scenario 3 21 805 10 10 4,536 224 10 0 10 10 0 10 IL T R L T R L T R L T R 1998 Existing 10 712 10 10 967 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 2002 No Build 10 805 10 10 1,093 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 I 2002 Scenario 1 99 816 10 10 1,093 1,696 10 0 10 10 0 10 2002 Scenario 2 179 816 10 10 1,093 3,216 10 0 10 10 0 10 2002 Scenario 3 191 816 10 10 1,093 3,454 10 0 10 10 0 10 I TH 169 is considered a north/south roadway with intersection roadways running east/west. 1998 Existing is taken directly from turn movement counts recorded at the intersection. 2002 No Build multiplies the 1998 counts by the growth factor for four years without traffic from the amphitheater. I 2002 Scenario 1 accounts for traffic from an attendance level of 10,000 people. 2002 Scenario 2 accounts for traffic from an attendance level of 18,000 people. 2002 Scenario 3 accounts for traffic from a maximum attendance of 19,250 people. L—left turn movements T—through movements R—right turn movements I I 33 TABLE 21-9 TURN MOVEMENTS AT KEY INTERSECTIONS FOR THE FRIDAY PM PEAK HOUR OF ARRIVAL FOR AMPHITHEATER EVENTS -2020 ANALYSIS E1@B S L T R L T R L T R L TRE 1998 Existing 272 598 1 8 823 49 49 24 389 4 21 9 2020 No Build 522 1,148 2 15 1,580 94 94 46 747 8 40 17 ' 2020 Scenario 1 522 1,148 2 15 2,880 94 94 46 927 8 40 17 2020 Scenario 2 522 1,148 2 15 3,920 94 94 46 1,071 8 40 17 2020 Scenario 3 522 1,148 2 15 4,083 94 94 46 1,093 8 40 17 ,g !. rmj, Wim L T R L R L T R L T R 1998 Existing 132 595 30 21 793 260 226 95 165 37 66 26 I 2020 No Build 253 1,142 58 40 1,523 499 434 182 317 71 127 50 2020 Scenario 1 253 1,142 58 40 3,003 499 434 182 517 91 127 50 2020 Scenario 2 253 1,142 58 40 4,187 499 434 182 677 107 127 50 I 2020 Scenario 3 253 1,142 58 40 4,372 499 434 182 702 110 127 50 *,e.,,,w a .._ •�, ae. <?• .. ,m,�••;4;«. ,, ts�+, # # d ,$_.- b.,,`A_ +a.�C�'. _:sd^ w�� # �. �A.a:s�q �.� a.��.#« -� ' L T R L T R L T R L T R 1998 Existing 0 688 24 10 945 2 3 0 1 21 0 14 2020 No Build 0 1,321 46 19 1,814 4 6 0 2 40 0 27 2020 Scenario 1 0 1,321 46 19 3,514 4 6 0 2 240 0 27 I 2020 Scenario 2 0 1,321 46 19 4,874 4 6 0 2 400 0 27 2020 Scenario 3 0 1,321 46 19 5,087 4 6 0 2 425 0 27 L T R L T R L T R L T R 1998 Existing 10 712 10 10 967 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 ' 2020 No Build 10 1,367 10 10 1,857 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 2020 Scenario 1 21 1,367 10 10 3,543 224 10 0 10 10 0 10 2020 Scenario 2 21 1,367 10 10 5,063 224 10 0 10 10 0 10 2020 Scenario 3 21 1,367 10 10 5,300 224 10 0 10 10 0 10 `ae s `. '' � .a ,_.. ,�:"..�# • -�s � ��'� �3g#9f } L T R L T R L T R L T R ' 1998 Existing 10 712 10 10 967 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 2020 No Build 10 1,367 10 10 1,857 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 2020 Scenario 1 99 1,378 10 10 1,857 1,696 10 0 10 10 0 10 I 2020 Scenario 2 179 1,378 10 10 1,857 3,216 10 0 10 10 0 10 2020 Scenario 3 191 1,378 10 10 1,857 3,454 10 0 10 10 0 10 TH 169 is considered a north/south roadway with intersection roadways running east/west. 1998 Existing is taken directly from turn movement counts recorded at the intersection. 2020 No Build multiplies the 1998 counts by the growth factor for 22 years without traffic from the amphitheater. 2020Scenario 1 accounts for traffic from an attendance level of 10,000 people. 2020Scenario 2 accounts for traffic from an attendance level of 18,000 people. 2020Scenario 3 accounts for traffic from a maximum attendance of 19,250 people. L-left turn movements T-through movements R-right turn movements 34 I TABLE 21-10 TURN MOVEMENTS AT KEY INTERSECTIONS FOR THE SATURDAY PM PEAK HOUR OF ARRIVAL FOR AMPHITHEATER EVENTS, 2002 ANALYSIS I . -.,..: -..''',::::..4.4:,,.....t.. .14-: s, s'. ' , ak k es : °j e. to s cs st.= „ . s a r' , ,€ .` are c t,;- , +....�s'1 sr�sr *+ce& :;✓.r,. ,a;3� .::fi ....,,,,44:4;:f..,4,,,d' L T R L T R L T R L �T` R 1998 Existing 282 1,367 0 12 476 47 37 22 224 3 12 10 I 2002 No Build 319 1,545 0 14 538 53 42 25 253 3 14 11 2002 Scenario 1 319 1,545 0 14 1,838 53 42 25 433 3 14 11 2002 Scenario 2 319 1,545 0 14 2,878 53 42 25 577 3 14 11 I2002 Scenario 3 319 1,545 0 14 3,040 53 42 25 600 3 14 11 T R L T R L TRL TR I 1998 Existing 164 1,228 88 19 566 124 447 72 158 30 61 73 2002 No Build 185 1,388 99 21 640 140 505 81 179 34 69 82 2002 Scenario 1 185 1,388 99 21 2,120 140 505 81 379 54 69 82 I 2002 Scenario 2 185 1,388 99 21 3,304 140 505 81 539 70 69 82 2002 Scenario 3 185 1,388 99 21 3,489 140 505 81 564 72 69 82 , „ a�. +�°. . a ',., :,�..:� LR L T R 1998 Existing 3 666 35 18 764 1 0 0 0 23 0 9 2002 No Build 3 753 40 20 863 1 0 0 0 26 0 10 I2002 Scenario 1 3 753 40 20 2,563 1 0 0 0 226 0 10 2002 Scenario 2 3 753 40 20 3,923 1 0 0 0 386 0 10 2002 Scenario 3 3 753 40 20 4,136 1 0 0 0 411 0 10 ,. s. � ...._i .., ro t, 3 .�. �� -::zx*:,�.m f x,:ai..�,. u.�,a+a.*e� , . ... L T R L T R L T R L T R I 1998 Existing 10 704 10 10 787 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 2002 No Build 10 796 10 10 889 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 2002 Scenario 1 21 796 10 10 2,576 224 10 0 10 10 0 10 I 2002 Scenario 2 21 796 10 10 4,096 224 10 0 10 10 0 10 2002 Scenario 3 21 796 10 10 4,333 224 10 0 10 10 0 10 ,5 C ,4 $ #! , ��.: y , 3gi*,:,72:-„, � � §-:',,,i f § ,T l�laB _ g . . a tea. ..... <..s., n... � „,,4:,,-,.- fes' .#< '� - 1° m � ,�;-;-' IL T R L T R L T R L T R 1998 Existing 10 704 10 10 787 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 2002 No Build 10 796 10 10 889 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 I 2002 Scenario 1 99 807 10 10 889 1,696 10 0 10 10 0 10 2002 Scenario 2 179 807 10 10 889 3,216 10 0 10 10 0 10 2002 Scenario 3 191 807 10 10 889 3,454 10 0 10 10 0 10 I TH 169 is considered a north/south roadway with intersection roadways running east/west. 1998 Existing is taken directly from turn movement counts recorded at the intersection. 2020 No Build multiplies the 1998 counts by the growth factor for 22 years without traffic from the amphitheater. I 2020 Scenario 1 accounts for traffic from an attendance level of 10,000 people. 2020 Scenario 2 accounts for traffic from an attendance level of 18,000 people. 2020 Scenario 3 accounts for traffic from an attendance level of 19,250 people. I L—left turn movements T—through movements R—right turn movements I I 35 TABLE 21-11 TURN MOVEMENTS AT KEY INTERSECTIONS FOR THE SATURDAY PM PEAK HOUR OF ARRIVAL FOR AMPHITHEATER EVENTS, 2020 ANALYSIS un i a;r #3 3 ar ? .5m• L TR L TR L �T R L T R 1998 Existing 282 1,367 0 12 476 47 37 22 224 3 12 10 2020 No Build 541 2,625 0 23 914 90 71 42 430 6 23 19 ' 2020 Scenario 1 541 2,625 0 23 2,214 90 71 42 610 6 23 19 2020 Scenario 2 541 2,625 0 23 3,254 90 71 42 754 6 23 19 2020 Scenario 3 541 2,625 0 23 3,416 90 71 42 777 6 23 19 • r,>^•.a5 £ • t� . L T R L TR L T R L T Ka 1998 Existing 164 1,228 88 19 566 124 447 72 158 30 61 73 2020 No Build 315 2,358 169 36 1,087 238 858 138 303 58 117 140 2020 Scenario 1 315 2,358 169 36 2,567 238 858 138 503 78 117 140 111 2020 Scenario 2 315 2,358 169 36 3,751 238 858 138 663 94 117 140 111 2020 Scenario 3 315 2,358 169 36 3,936 238 858 138 688 96 117 140 em" ° ,�p-° '�i "� • „,ate a' � ... ., L TR L TR L T R L T R 1998 Existing 3 666 35 18 764 1 0 0 0 23 0 9 ' 2020 No Build 6 1,279 67 35 1,467 2 0 0 0 44 0 17 2020 Scenario 1 6 1,279 67 35 3,167 2 0 0 0 244 0 17 2020 Scenario 2 6 1,279 67 35 4,527 2 0 0 0 404 0 17 2020 Scenario 3 6 1,279 67 35 4,739 2 0 0 0 429 0 17 T R L TR 1998 Existing 10 704 10 10 787 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 2020 No Build 10 1,352 10 10 1,511 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 2020 Scenario 1 21 1,352 10 10 3,197 224 10 0 10 10 0 10 2020 Scenario 2 21 1,352 10 10 4,717 224 10 0 10 10 0 10 2020 Scenario 3 21 1,352 10 10 4,955 224 10 0 10 10 0 10 • t, -T. - at ..<„ ,:k :<,., '. .,>, �� ,., 'gym. tto .. ...;, q.., .�s_ .>:o`�. x• L TR L T R L T R L T R 1998 Existing 10 704 10 10 787 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 I 2020 No Build 10 1,352 10 10 1,511 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 2020 Scenario 1 99 1,363 10 10 1,511 1,696 10 0 10 10 0 10 2020 Scenario 2 179 1,363 10 10 1,511 3,216 10 0 10 10 0 10 I 2020 Scenario 3 191 1,363 10 10 1,511 3,454 10 0 10 10 0 10 TH 169 is considered a north/south roadway with intersection roadways running east/west. 1998 Existing is taken directly from turn movement counts recorded at the intersection. 2002 No Build multiplies the 1998 counts by the growth factor for 4 years without traffic from the amphitheater. 2002 Scenario 1 accounts for traffic from an attendance level of 10,000 people. 2002 Scenario 2 accounts for traffic from an attendance level of 18,000 people. 2002 Scenario 3 accounts for traffic from an attendance level of 19,250 people. L-left turn movements T-through movements R-right turn movements 36 ' 22. Vehicle-Related Air Emissions: Estimate the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality, including carbon>monoxide levels. Discuss the effectof traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts. Note: If the project involves 500 or more parking ' spaces,consult:EAW Guidelines about whether a detailed:air quality analysis is needed. Carbon Monoxide emissions from motor vehicles and associated concentrations adjacent ' to critical intersections are based upon maximum attendance (19,250) projections for traffic that are presented in response to Item #21. For this study, one-hour concentrations at critical intersections have been estimated for traffic approaching the amphitheater between 6:30 and 7:30 p.m. on a Friday evening. Emissions for 2002 were estimated using the MOBILE 5A emissions model. Concentrations adjacent to the five critical intersections along TH 169 were estimated using the CAL3QHC dispersion model rfor receptor sites 100 feet from the intersection in each of the four quadrants although there are no existing receptor sites this close to these intersections. These receptors were selected to represent potentially worst case air quality impacts associated with the amphitheater. Assumptions for the emission and dispersion analysis are presented in Table 22-1. ' TABLE 22-1 Assumptions Used In CO Modeling Traffic Approach Speed: 25 mph on all roadways Signal Cycle Time: Varies by intersection Green Time: Varies by intersection ' Percent Cold Starts: 20% Vehicle Mix: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area mix ' Wind Speed: One meter per second Wind Direction: Direction yielding highest concentration ' In addition to concentrations near critical intersections, an estimate of air quality impact on the homes immediately south of the parking lot has been made for the one-hour period when 5,900 vehicles are assumed to depart within that period. ' Background concentrations of Carbon Monoxide were based upon readings taken near Lake Susan in Chanhassen in May 1996. This is the closest Carbon Monoxide background-monitoring site known to the MPCA. That site is approximately 10 miles north of the proposed amphitheater but in a more densely populated area of the Twin Cities. The one-hour and eight-hour background concentrations were adjusted to 2002 based upon emission changes and growth in overall regional traffic. The ratio of emissions was based upon an average speed of 25 mph in 1996 with Inspection/Maintenance and 2002 with no Inspection/Maintenance program. An overall regional growth of two percent in vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)was also assumed. Projected one-hour concentrations for the base case and with the amphitheater at the receptor site with the highest concentration at each intersection are presented in Table 22-2, ' which also shows the expected increase in concentrations. These concentrations include a one-hour background of 4.1 ppm or slightly lower at these intersections, the overall concentrations are well below the one-hour standard of 30 ppm. ' 37 I Table 22-2 1 Projected One-Hour Carbon Monoxide Concentrations Maximum at 100 feet -2002 (concentrations are in ppm - parts per million) I �� ,asr g�sx sCr�.c. 4R a ey TH:169at".CR69 2.6 6.7 4.1 TH 169 at TH 41 3.4 7.3 3.9 TH 169 at CR 14 2.9 6.8 3.9 TH 169 at North Access 2.6 6.3 3.7 TH 169 at Bluff Drive 2.6 6.6 4.0 MPCA one-hour standard 30.0 30.0 1 Projected eight-hour concentrations for the base case and with the amphitheater are presented in Table 22-3, which also shows the expected increase in concentrations. These concentrations include an eight-hour background of 1.7 ppm. The worst case eight-hour concentrations were estimated from one-hour concentrations based upon a I running eight-hour average of hourly traffic volumes on TH 169, plus the inbound amphitheater peak which occurs during the afternoon time period. The projected eight- hour concentrations are approximately one-half of the eight-hour 9.0 ppm standard, with I a maximum increase in eight-hour concentration of 1.9 ppm. Table 22-3 Projected Eight-Hour Carbon Monoxide Concentrations I Maximum at 100 feet -2002 (concentrations are in ppm - parts per million) I Via-11A F YSr t�$° , I;r ' �' � n- TH169atCR69 2.5 4.4 1.9 TH 169 at TH 41 3.3 4.8 1.5 TH 169 at CR 14 2.8 4.5 1.7 TH 169 at North Access 2.5 4.3 1.8 1 I TH 169 at Bluff Drive 2.5 4.4 1.9 MPCA 1-hour standard 9.0 9.0 1 The maximum expected one-hour Carbon Monoxide concentration at homes immediately south of the parking lot was estimated using the area source (parking lot) component of the EDMS model developed by the FAA for evaluation of airport emissions, including large parking areas. As a worst case assumption, it was assumed that 5,900 vehicles will exit the parking lot in a one-hour time period. (The longer the exit period the higher the concentration.) An average idle 1 time of five minutes per vehicle and travel speed of 15 mph was assumed. Under the worst meteorological conditions (wind from the northeast at one meter per second and a stable atmosphere)a maximum one-hour concentration of 14.5 ppm including a background I concentration of 1.9 ppm is predicted. This is approximately one-half of the 30.0 ppm one-hour standard. Since most vehicle activity in the parking lot takes place over a two-hour period (one- hour in and one-hour out), the maximum eight-hour average concentration, which includes both I periods, is estimated to be 5.0 ppm, which is below the 9.0 ppm eight-hour standard. This is 38 I based upon a concentration for inbound traffic as high as that for outbound traffic and hourly concentrations that are 0.2 ppm over the worst case eight-hour background concentration. ' Based upon the analysis of carbon monoxide emissions associated with motor vehicles accessing the site, and moving into and out of the parking area, no significant air quality impacts are anticipated with amphitheater operation. 1 23. Stationary Source Air Emissions. Describe the type,"souro s,quantities and ' compositionabfany;emrssions frominatipnary sources o air emissions such as boilers, eexhaustsiacks‘oriugitiverdust sources ;Include any hazardous,airpoilataritslconsult EAW CSwrierin a sb and any„greenh ruse:gasses.(such as carborillioxide,1pethane or nitrous o d e);and rezone=depleting chemicals(chloro-tluar rbons, ydircfluoroeerbons, <partlubrocarboni or sulfur trexafluoricle) Also describe:°art proposed pollution.prevention tec n q a nd peedfir pat utirn cnOblol devices,.-Describethe_impacts:on air quality. The only anticipated furnace emissions would be to heat office space for permanent staff of 15 or less. 1 24. Odors, Noise and Dust:10dors 'Will the project grateodor:s,noise ord st during'construction or ' wring°operation? .' X Yes No if es.:describe;sou =.characteristics, duration;quantities,oeinteniityanflanY, proposed measures; mit gate adverse impacts. :Also ons ilearbY t `sensitive receptors and estimate impacts on them. 'DISCuasTotential,impa on tiuman health or qualityoflife. (Note:fugitive,dust generated byeperations'may'be discussed at Item #23 instead of here.) Odors: ' The primary odor generating sources will be associated with the management of domestic sewage and solid waste. Domestic sewage will be collected in holding tanks which will be vented and may result in some odor problems in the immediate vicinity of the tank vents, but should not present a large enough source of odor problems to be noticeable off of the site. Trucks hauling the sewage away from the site may also present an odor problem if they fail to close their hatch or if there are any accidental spills. Solid waste also has the potential for odor problems; however, this waste will be managed to reduce litter and will removed within 24 hours after an event. Odors will also be associated with food processing and waste disposal. It is not anticipated that these odors will be noticeable off of the site. 39 1 1 1 Noise: Noise associated with the proposed amphitheater will be caused by the following sources: • Construction • Sound amplification and associated special effects of concerts and events • Crowds at major events • Traffic accessing and departing the site , Noise Standards: Minnesota State Noise Standards, presented in TABLE 24.1, have been established for residential, commercial and industrial land uses. These standards are expressed in A- weighted decibels (dBA), which is a commonly used measure for community noise. The standards are expressed in terms of L10 (the level not to be exceeded for ten percent, or six minutes of an hour) and L50 (the level not to be exceeded for 50 percent or 30 minutes of an hour). TABLE 24.1 1 MINNESOTA STATE NOISE STANDARDS .... '�a�ki.� �`•'��c��.''��'``�'�` ��. � ����;���aa;,w`": x?a-�� �rc y�... .. .A ,,:.�1�` ....:r,.'C* ....Y3.��. Classification Land Use L10 L50 L10 L50 NAC-1 Residential 65 60 55 50 NAC-2 Commercial 70 65 70 65 I NAC-3 Industrial 80 75 80 75 Source: Minnesota Rules Part 7030.0040 (1997). Vulnerable land uses include residential areas to the north and east of the amphitheater ' and the Louisville Swamp/Minnesota Valley State Recreational Area to the west of the amphitheater. The wing walls and stage structure are designed to provide substantial shielding for the area located to the rear of the stage. This structure is expected to provide from 20 to 25 dBA reduction in sound level, which is equivalent to shrinking the noise contour by 90 percent. Therefore, the most vulnerable land uses are located in front of the wing walls. The nearest residence in front of the wing walls is located 3,200 feet to the northeast of the amphitheater(#8 in Figure 24.1). The closest Louisville Swamp nature trail is located approximately 3,200 feet west of the amphitheater. Since concerts may extend past 10 p.m., both daytime and nighttime residential standards are used in this assessment to evaluate potential noise impacts from the amphitheater. 1 40 1 ' Based upon Minn. Statutes part 116.07, subdivision.2a, noise standards apply only to roadways within the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul. However, for compatibility planning and noise impact analysis, estimates of traffic noise levels along access ' roadways have been made. Ambient Noise Levels: During the evening hours, background noise will be dominated by traffic along TH 169 which passes along the east side of the Minnesota River Valley. Assuming minimal traffic volumes on TH 169 in the late evening hours (500 automobiles per hour in each direction), the estimated ambient noise levels at the homes closest to the amphitheater are presented in TABLE 24.2. Traffic noise levels are expected to be higher in the earlier evening hours. ' TABLE 24.2 ESTIMATED AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS AT CLOSEST RESIDENCES ' (Late evening hours) 2-- - ..tNorth' .:s.E .�,. o.T. North' 3,500 800 52 47 Northea 3,200 1,800 43 39 Southeast3 2,200 250 63 58 Southwest3 2,200 1,600 44 40 1#18 in Figure 24.1 2#8 in Figure 24.1 3Shielded by wing walls 1 1 1 1 41 i I FIGURE 24.1 I Projected L50 (50 dBA) Contour from Amplified Sound %0.25 mi 1 ' ' . ,--='!% : / ),), ,,i ,...., I :fff4.60.i.:::::::::":::`:::::::::::'::::!:::i:1:'::•:::::::•.. ''..N:/ \ I q' /d7.,>/(`. x t I_'+ !#:,. gyp..,:•;.:;:•...• , I �4t` P _ mt i a t Z`... • gas ", �`���� ''� .":".:.::: . I \ 4 ; " •%.:*3. i \ 1 t \ 1.-/t ,, , - ,�- ;A It 2 9 mi.: ■ 1: 11 \ f 'y" t + ' `\ \ 1 aha -.�� •......• i ` �� r,� � �� � 1 x;114// �/1/141/17i .111 "l'!M>56\• \ (` \ ' \ • --,2%). ;-''4441?. .). -, yo,, The expected L50 (50 dBA) noise contour associated with the loudest concert events is shown in Figure 24.1. The L10 (55 dBA) noise contour associated with the loudest I concert events is essentially identical to the L50 contour since the L10 level for typical concerts are five dBA above the L50 level. Therefore, when the L50 level is 50 dBA, the L10 level is 55 dBA. The right portion of the contour is larger than the left portion and I reflects potential impacts on the bluff and does not include any ground attenuation. The left portion of the contour reflects potential impacts on the valley floor and in the flood plain and includes some attenuation from vegetation. I For the two residences located 1,500 feet or more from the highway, ambient noise levels are projected to be similar to typical sound levels in a semi-rural environment. I Noise levels were monitored on Friday, 9 July 1999, at 15311 Minnesota Valley Bluff Drive, which are approximately 2,500 feet east of TH 169 and 150 feet above the roadway (#16 in Figure 24.1). After 11:00 p.m., the L50 sound level at that residence I was 41 dBA, which is slightly higher than predicted by the highway noise model. This could be due to higher than assumed traffic volumes, slightly less attenuation than included in the model or some noise from wind. The projected L50 at this home is I representative of homes along the bluff east of the proposed amphitheater. Noise levels were also monitored on the Mazomani Loop Trail at a location along the I centerline of the amphitheater approximately 5,000 feet from the proposed stage. 42 1 I I I Readings were taken on Thursday, 8 July 1998, both east (bench overlooking the swamp) and west (Elaine Buzzard memorial)of the trail connecting the loop with the parking lot. A typical ambient level of 40 dBA was recorded at those locations. The I predicted L50 level from the amphitheater of 45 dBA will be approximately 5dBA over the observed ambient. Assessment of Noise Sources: IConstruction Noise Noise from construction equipment will not be dissimilar to the mining equipment that had previously been operating on the site. Construction phases would include grading and Isite preparation, paving, berm construction, building and amphitheater construction. With typical noise levels associated with heavy construction equipment of 85 to 90 dBA at 50 feet, noise levels east of TH 169 during daytime construction periods will be similar to, or Ilower than, noise from automobiles and trucks travelling on the roadway during that time period. Although during grading and retention pond construction, equipment sound I levels may be as high as 75 dBA, noise levels at the multi-family building located approximately 250 feet east of TH 169 will be dominated by traffic along TH 169. The closest residences are located approximately 150 feet southwest of the site where I primarily grading will occur. The maximum expected sound level from equipment operating at the edge of the property is 80 dBA. However, since equipment will not be stationary on the site, average noise levels are expected to remain below the MPCA I daytime standards for residential land uses. As mandated by the Indirect Source Permit that will be required for this project, construction equipment and activities will have to comply with MPCA rules on air Iemissions and noise, including being properly fitted with adequate mufflers and complying with the State Noise Standards. I Sound Amplification of Concerts and Events The primary noise emissions from the amphitheater site will be associated with amplified sound for concerts and other events. Occasionally there may be noise from special I effects used in shows such as fireworks for a Fourth of July concert. Noise from such special effects is not being evaluated in this EAW due to the inability to model or predict the resultant noise impacts. The issue of special effects noise will be dealt with during Ithe Conditional Use Permit(CUP) process. An assessment of the highest expected sound levels associated with concerts has been I performed based upon data from similar concerts and standard computer modeling procedures. Sound level data from ten different groups performing at one of the last Riverfest events in St. Paul were analyzed to establish the typical sound level spectrum I and time history of amplified concert sound. Since a maximum sound level (L01) of 105 dBA at the mix location 100 feet from the stage was required at that series of concerts, the data are directly applicable to the proposed amphitheater where a maximum (L01) I sound level of 105 dBA will be established at the mix. Details of amphitheater and grass lawn/berm design were used to establish the potential for partial shielding of sound from the stage and roof loudspeakers. A maximum sound level at the rear of the back berm of 1 92 dBA has been used for the prediction of off-site sound levels. 43 I I 1 The terrain surrounding the proposed project is essentially flat along the East Side of the Minnesota River Valley at an elevation of approximately 750 feet above sea level. The bluff to the east of the river valley begins approximately 3,000 feet east of the amphitheater and rises about 150 feet in elevation to 900 feet. Eighteen homes have been identified from maps and aerial photographs along the bluff between the amphitheater and county road 14 and north of the amphitheater south of County Road 14 (see Figure 24.1). The Louisville Swamp is located within the Minnesota River flood plain and is approximately 700 feet in elevation or 50 feet below the valley floor to the east. Because the amphitheater will be used in the warmer months, some attenuation of sound by soil and vegetation has been assumed for receptor sites at the same or lower elevations than the amphitheater. No attenuation or natural terrain shielding is provided for homes situated on the bluff to the east. Noise level contours from the loudest expected concert have been used to generate noise r contours and establish an area of potential noise impact around the amphitheater. Some of the assumptions upon which the noise contours are based are: • The amphitheater is oriented approximately 20 degrees west of due north. • The roof structure extends over the seating area for approximately 200 feet from the stage and a 15-foot back wall (this varies from 6' at the sides to 20' in the center) drops from the roof around the perimeter of the roof to provide additional attenuation of sound from the stage speakers. This will leave an opening between the seating area and the back wall of approximately 18 feet. • The roof will be constructed with an acoustical steel deck and absorption will be placed on the interior of the back wall. • A reduction of 3 dBA has been assumed for sound levels emanating from speakers on the stage of the amphitheater by the back wall and acoustical material within the permanent roof structure. • The stage (touring) speakers are assumed to be suspended from the roof at an elevation of 30 feet above the stage. • Roof-mounted speaker and distributed lawn speakers are assumed to supplement sound levels from the stage speakers to maintain the sound level (L01) at 92 dBA at the back of the berm. • The stage structure walls and roof are continuous and solid. • The berm is 55 feet high with a 10-foot wall at the rear of the lawn area. As the berm drops to 18 feet at the wing wall, the perimeter wall increases to 20 feet in height, providing a sound wall 38 feet above grade. This analysis has been performed for a neutral atmosphere and assumes normal barrier performance. As noted below, wind can influence the overall level of sound at large distances from the source. Wing walls extend from the side of the stage to the perimeter wall on the berm. • Ground attenuation of sound due to vegetative cover is based upon theoretical estimates from published empirical data. • The sound level projections have been made for a neutral wind condition. This calculation does not take into account the effect of unfavorable winds or atmospheric I conditions. Prevailing winds in the summer are from the southeast(see FIGURE 24.2 through 24.4), which is generally away from adjacent residential areas. Atmospheric inversions, which could affect sound propagation generally, form in the early morning hours in summer. Wind and inversion could easily change the 44 1 1 ' predicted sound levels by as much as 5 to 10 dBA. However, it is standard procedure when evaluating noise impacts for comparison with state standards to perform the analysis under neutral (no wind) atmospheric conditions. Even if it were possible to predict sound levels upwind and downwind from a source for increments of wind speed and direction (for which no data is available), it is not possible to predict wind conditions during concerts or during those portions of concerts when the maximum sound level assumed here will occur. Figures 24.2 -24.4 are Windroses, which depict the direction from which the wind blows. The longer the radius the more frequently the wind is from that direction. Figure 24.2 June Wind Rose JUNE WIND ROSE MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL N Percent Frequency of 15-.- WindsMIHr-I(3.6MSec-1) • 10- 1 5- II IFA W ' 15 10 5 ! S 10 15 10— 15 1 111 45 1 1 r Figure 24.3 July Wind Rose JULY WIND ROSE MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL N Percent Frequency of 15 Winds'_8 Mi Nr- (3.6 M Sec-') r 10 5 *171 w 15 10 S 10 1�SE111 • 10 15 46 1 ' Figure 24.4 August Wind Rose ' AUGUST WINO ROSE MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL Percent Frequency of 15 N Winds�8 Mi Hr-I(3.6 M Sec- to— 111 5— ec-10- 5— Iw' ( „Alba I IE 15 10 5 ' 5 10 15 111 10--- 15 0-15 ' Controls have also been proposed to ensure that noise levels do not exceed the levels proposed. The controls proposed in addition to the construction and design mitigation include: ' • The sound level at the mix location (not greater than 100 feet from the stage)will be limited to 105 dBA. • A Grozier Concert Monitoring System, or similar system, will provide information at the mixing board to enable the sound engineer to monitor and limit the maximum level to 105 dBA . The system will also include three to five microphones at the property line or on the perimeter noise wall. Sound testing will establish allowable levels at these microphone locations to help achieve compliance with state noise standards at the nearby residential receptor sites. Data from the sound monitoring ' system will be provided to the County within five business days after each event(this can be a condition of the CUP). 47 1 1 1 1 • Q-Prime has offered to reimburse the County for sound level monitoring during four performances in each of the first two concert seasons. • Top of stage loudspeaker cluster will be limited to a height at least 20 feet below the top of the perimeter noise wall at the rear center of the lawn. • The facility will maintain a complaint hot line and publicize the number. From Figure 24.1 it can be seen that under standard neutral atmospheric conditions the ' L50 contour is not expected to reach homes to the east or the Louisiana Swamp trail to the west. Under neutral atmospheric conditions, no exceedances of the state noise standards are expected at any of the residences adjacent to the amphitheater either during the daytime hours ending at 10:00 p.m. or during the nighttime hours after 10:00 p.m. Because of the orientation of the amphitheater to the NNW and prevailing summer 111 winds in the area, an increase in sound level and hence contour area downwind of the amphitheater is not expected to cause exceedances of the state standards at adjacent homes or on any of the Louisiana Swamp nature trails. , Crowds at Major Events A peak crowd noise level of 101 dBA was monitored adjacent to the crowd of approximately 20,000 spectators at Riverfest in St. Paul. As noted in the assumptions above, there will be a perimeter wall around the entire berm and wing walls extending out from the stage. The largest concentration of attendees will be under the roof, with a less dense distribution over the lawn area. While maximum crowd levels may reach this level, sustained voice effort that could cause an exceedance of the L10 standard has not been recorded by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Therefore, the noise contours . developed for amplified sound will be the controlling factor for establishing a noise impact area around the amphitheater. Traffic Accessing the Site Traffic noise levels and changes in noise level were estimated for Saturday afternoon, for which the increase in traffic over baseline is expected to be greatest during the daytime , period. Traffic noise levels and changes in noise level were also estimated for a late evening period for which the increase in traffic over baseline (without the Renaissance Festival because it is closed at dark) is expected to be the greatest during the nighttime , period, as defined in the state noise standards. TABLE 24.3 shows the maximum predicted L10 noise levels at a distance of 100 feet from the critical access intersections on Saturday afternoon. Also shown in the table are the expected increase in noise because of the project. Applicable noise standards for commercial land uses, which surround these intersections, are noted in TABLE 24.1. An L10 of 70 dBA is applicable at these land uses both during daytime and nighttime periods. , 1 48 111 I 1 TABLE 24.3 ' PROJECTED TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS (Saturday Afternoon) (L10 in dBA) TH 169 at CR 69 69.9 70.6 0.7 TH 169 at TH 41 70.1 70.8 0.7 ' TH 169 at CR 14 67.3 69.2 1.9 TH 169 at Access 67.2 68.0 0.8 TH 169 at Bluff 67.4 68.9 1.5 At the northernmost intersection with higher traffic on roadways crossing TH 169, the levels are close to 70.0 dBA and increase less than 1.0 dBA. This is essentially the commercial noise standard. For the other intersections, the level remains below 70.0 dBA even with the project, but is above the 65 dBA residential daytime standard without the project. ' For the late evening hours, it has been assumed that traffic volumes at each of the intersections are relatively low, with an average of 500 vehicles per hour southbound on TH 169 and 200 vehicles per hour northbound. In the peak nighttime hour after a performance, a total of 3,200 vehicles per hour are assumed to be northbound on TH 169. A drop of five mph in average speed at these intersections is assumed for ' northbound traffic during this period. TABLE 24.4 shows the maximum predicted L10 noise levels at a distance of 100 feet from a typical intersection on TH 169 north of the amphitheater. Traffic noise levels at the access and Bluff Drive are expected to be low ' because of the relatively low traffic speed at these points. TABLE 24.4 PROJECTED TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS (Late Evening) (L10indBA) TH 169/Typical 69 72 3 ' The projected sound level at 100 feet from these intersections is estimated to be 2.0 dBA over the commercial L10 standard with an increase in L10 of 3.0 dBA. While the increase in noise level will be noticeable, it is not expected to have an adverse impact on the commercial land uses adjacent to these intersections. If traffic from the Renaissance Festival is included in the background, some further decrease in traffic speed is expected and an increase in the L10 level of less than 3.0 dBA are expected. Therefore, no significant impacts from noise related to traffic accessing the site are expected. 49 1 I I Dust: I The following dust producing activities and/or dust control solutions are: • Dust will be generated during construction. Efforts will be made to suppress and minimize dust production though the use of water trucks on haul roads and other I methods as agreed upon with the County. Public roads will be swept in accordance with MnDOT and County policies. • A limited amount of dust production will occur when cars are parking prior to ' performances and when departing the performances. • Dust will be produced only occasionally during dry conditions within the seasonal operations of the amphitheater(approximately Memorial Day through Labor Day). • When dry weather results in the potential for fugitive dust due to vehicular traffic on the gravel parking access roads, watering or other methods of the suppression may be used. Enforced traffic speed limits and controlled access to unpaved roadways • 111 will also help minimize vehicular dust production. During operation of the facility, some dust may be generated in the grassed parking areas. Access lanes to the grassed parking areas may be surfaced with gravel. Dust will be generated during I parking periods when dry conditions exist. • Q Prime has stated that they operate under a good neighbor policy. If there are reasonable concerns that develop as a result of operations at the site, the company will I make reasonable efforts to address the concerns quickly and amicably. 25. Nearby tesocurces Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to thesite.° , _, Archeological,historical,z r architectural resources? * "j ` I _Yes X No I Prime or unique farmlands or land within an agricultural preserve? Yes X No I Designated parks,recreation areas or trails?: I X Yes _ No III Scenic views and vistas?..„ Yes X No I I 50 II I I I Other unique resources? Yes X No IIf any t*Above-were:enswer lyes, desc,ibe.the resource and.identity any.project related impactsson;the r urce,'' ©escnbe any measures°to be taken to minimize or Iavoid adverse impacts 1 The project site is located approximately one-quarter mile east of the Minnesota Valley INational Wildlife Refuge Area and Carver Rapids State Wayside Park and the Louisville Swamp Unit Recreational Trail System. A 10-foot high wall will be installed around the perimeter of the lawn seating area to reduce sound levels. IThe Minnesota Historical Society was asked to identify and describe any designated historic structures or archaeological sites known to exist within one mile of the project site. Based on the Society's review, the project will not affect any historical or Iarchaeological properties. "Exhibit N" is a letter from the Minnesota Historical Society that summarizes the review findings. perat; p ° tbdv� �ti� dunrc�oZG, Viuttel t �creasih Ib a n ldern ar nlaI tVe n? �es'glare:fromintense ig ?visibleeu�esro I�,towarsor=exhaut stats . X Yes _ No i Lighting will be used to illuminate stage, seating and parking areas. All lighting will be I installed and operated in accordance with the County's Conditional Use Permit and Zoning Ordinance. Most lighting will be extinguished within two hours or less of performance completion. The lighting will be visible from the nearby wildlife refuge. Lights will be shielded and directed to shine away from the refuge and toward the interior of the facility. 27, compatibility With Plans and Land use RegulationsIS theProject`subject =an;adopt ! local comprehensive plan,°land use plan or regulation, or;other applicable-land:use,mater, or Iresource.management plan of-a local, regional,:state or federal agency. PSE,, X Yes No If yes, describe the '`Ian,discuss:the compatibility the 'Projectwith`the of the Pa itY P plan, discussits.compatibility with the project andexplain hour.any r li+ is will.be Iressolvec . if n©,explain. . I The project is allowed under the current zoning with a Conditional Use Permit(CUP). In addition, it will be subject to review for consistency with the local (Scott County) 51 I I comprehensive land use plan. The project site is located within an industrial area, ast 1 designated in Sand Creek and Louisville Township's land use plans. The County is the regulatory authority for the CUP. Sand Creek and Louisville Townships also have review responsibility for the CUP. No other land use, water or resource management plans I apply to this property. See also response in Item #9. 28. Impact on Infra ructuire'andePuiblic Services: will or expanded utilities, roads,.other I infrastructure, or pub lir services be required to serve the pr je X Yes No I If yes,des vibe the new or additional infrastructure or servicesneeded (Note: any I infra rta�that.is a connected action with respect to:the project must be assessed in the EAW,see 1Guidelines for.d€details-) Three right turn southbound and two left turn northbound lanes along Highway 169 will I be required. A single northbound and southbound turn lane will provide stacking and direct access to the amphitheater property at the VIP entrance. The single northbound I turn lane and double southbound turn lanes will provide additional deceleration and stacking space at the Bluff Drive intersection. Additional improvements will be necessary at Bluff Drive to accommodate increased traffic levels. These include two additionalII westbound lanes to the main entrance of the amphitheater and one additional eastbound lane, beginning near the main entrance. There is additional discussion of these improvements under Item #22. The rail crossings on the East Side of the site will also require widening. There are no other connected actions anticipated with the Amphitheater project. i 29. Cumulative �npa :k lir nesota Rule part 44113: 7 , subpart 7, item requiresat to RGU consider:the"c uiative potential effects of related orar ci + jects"w ' ' determining then need for an environmental impact state Gent Id any„ st, int or reasonably foreseeable future projects that may interact the` attire .s er EAW in such a way as to cause cumulative impacts. :Describe the nature or the cumulative impacts and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for,significant environmental effects due to cumulative imp(or'discuss each cumulative impact Wader appropriate items) elsewhere on this for}. I The developer has not indicated any interest in future stages of this project at this time. I Additional infrastructure will be needed to accommodate the traffic that this facility will generate. The RGU also anticipates that this facility has the potential to stimulate some supportive developments such as restaurants, hotels/motels and campgrounds. The I area along Highway 169 is currently zoned to accommodate such development, though lacks municipal sewer and water. I 52 i 30, Other P tential,:EEnvironmental Impacts: Ifihe project may cause any adverse ' environmental impacts not addressed by°Itemis.#1 to.28, identifyand discuss them here, along with.any:proposed:mitigation. ' The analysis of noise impacts presented in Item #24 was limited to a comparison of anticipated noise levels in relation to established noise regulations. The noise standards ' take into consideration only levels and not the impact on human health and the environment that might be related to the type of noise. There is limited, but growing, evidence to suggest that certain noises can have adverse impacts on human health and the environment at levels below the regulatory limits. Comments on the potential impact of noise, therefore, need not be restricted to a comparison of the regulatory standards alone; since the purpose of an EAW is to identify all potential environmental impacts, including those, which cannot be controlled by current regulatory programs. 31. SUMMA SUES: Do not complete this section if the EAW.is beim done for EIS sciprrt relevant issues ,chatScoping ScOPint7Decision docutin ##+ i!i'nus# accompany the-EAW%ListanY imPacts and issues identifiediabove hatFinay require further 1 investigationA fore:the prdiect is begun. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or'may be considered forfortheseimpacts,andissues,including those-that"have been xor mayirde as permit conditions. EAW Item #: 11. Fish, wildlife, and ecologically sensitive resources: The impact from this project to wildlife and human enjoyment of the adjacent natural resource area is acknowledged to be an aspect needing further consideration during the ' review process of this EAW. The County will rely on comments from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to develop any appropriate conditions for the Conditional Use Permit or for additional research in this ' regard. 17. Water quality and surface water runoff: The developer is proposing to reduce the quantity and improve the quality of surface water runoff by the use of an irrigation system, which would pump down the primary and secondary NURP ponds (see "Exhibit P"). This technology is subject to seasonal and 1 operational limitations and the developer has acknowledged that at certain times, the volume of outflow may exceed existing conditions, but the flow rate will remain low. The additional volume at 0.1 to 2.0 cfs for a long period will not have a detrimental impact on Sand Creek and the downstream waters and eventually to the Minnesota River. SWCD is still reviewing the proposed use of an irrigation system as a method of managing excess runoff. Comments are invited to assist the County in evaluating this proposed storm water management method. 1 53 1 1 19. Geologic hazards and soil conditions: The project site is in an area with exposed bedrock and is highly susceptible to ground water contamination. All surface water runoff will be directed into storm water ponds, one of which is a previously mined area where bedrock is exposed. Design and maintenance of the storm water ponds are critical to reduce the potential for ground water contamination. The exposed bedrock will be altered to avoid direct contact to bedrock. , 21. Traffic: The analysis of traffic conditions provided by the developer demonstrated that a specific traffic management plan will need to be developed for the purpose of managing traffic operations during the arrival and departure periods for amphitheater traffic. This plan will be developed through close coordination with staff from Mn/DOT, State Highway Patrol, County Public Works County Sheriffs Department and with Township officials. 24. Odors, noise and dust: This facility could result in exceedance of State noise standards as a result of weather conditions and excessive noise being generated at the facility. As noted in Item #30, the level of noise may not be the only impact on area residents and wildlife. Since the State noise standards are time weighted, and sound levels from music concerts fluctuate greatly, it is anticipated that noise bursts could exceed 50 dBA at nearby residents after 10:00 p.m.. Noise controls as noted herein will be addressed during the Conditional Use Permitting Process. 26. Visual impacts: Lights will be visible in the surrounding area, including the wildlife area west of the facility. Comments from the DNR and US Fish and Wildlife Service are expected to help develop any necessary controls as part of the Conditional Use Permit. 28. Impact on infrastructure and public services: Road and traffic management modifications will be necessary to accommodate the anticipated traffic from this facility. 1 1 I 1 54 I RGU CERTIFICATION: The Environmental Quality board will only accept SIGNED Environmental Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor. I hereby certify that: ' • The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. • The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this ' document, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9b and 60 respectively. • Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. (41.: 140.11VSignature: Date: /2-3-9 Allen Frechette Title: Environmental Health Manager ' This Environmental Assessment Worksheet was prepared by Scott County using the format provided by the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board as revised 2/99. Scott County made Non-substantive ' formatting changes to facilitate review, binding for distribution and publication on the County's Website. 1 55 1 I Maps and Exhibits 1 A. General Site Location on a County Map. B. USGS Map indicating the Project Boundaries. , C. Existing Drainage Areas. I D. Proposed Drainage Areas. E. Project Site Layout Plan. F. Soil Classification Map. ' G-1. Existing Flood Plains & Steep Slopes. G-2. Proposed Flood Plains & Steep Slopes. ' H. Impervious Surfaces & Off-Site Drainage Routes. I. Project Site Well Locations. J. Map showing Ground Water Susceptibility Areas. K. Map showing Bedrock Formations underlying site. L. Existing Wetland & Proposed Storm Sewer Outlet. M-1. County Zoning Map. 1 M-2. Surrounding Properties Map. N. Minnesota Historical Society Letter. O. Minnesota DNR Natural Heritage & Nongame Research Program Letter. I P. Proposed Irrigation System. 1 56 1 I 0 w 1N 7.7.13 1 < (0 t Tri co cu :ig, 4 _.,r . . •EL cli 13) o 1 = ._ 0 a Ce 2 Ce 0 CL C I ,f „ N :7:1 , . I maliali Iail) 41--------i ', litimage‘ Ammagil s '4 ' )111M1L IMPERIMMal ' CO 1Mill ti _ * t I" jiff III7 lulu ,_ /Lir I=ilMlIN 1 2 = w t mi,,. - til ,i +.• 0 r Ali: ' l' a` 7,140111L /- ,$). • 1 witilligilitaleaP:t- \ I ...c (..) ,, r' MINIPmac. 6_ NI= ,it.. 41111/Ciiil : Erdikirk AINlik A-ilIVANkr■ illartill114,1Wirgil C2. vi•di vVintz: 441444trillOr % 1041,kai la ,- ,,,, AMIN ),, ti � -- I E !:45141111' NVEZIP. ; ' or maxAmi ', t < t) U-J1 ilk ri INVICPum . . 1w (in _ z al- Atalopill i E F.._ _ w0 INNerl% )11, --, , ,, , 0 < W U ... eo IiliciAmm 0 _i r fr toi i LL egZ or-TA o --r viell 1 EXHI BIT A I I C >' c .o a W N13 O. . . ›, . . c v I �► O � / J o ca csil) o f I z —; - as c3c�a ' � L I z.. 2to0.) a) ZZZZ I 4)m co .... 1 ___) _)Li --v\) _.5 iflpou "tchr-ivi I i , 1 I a) (11) 6--3 - r.i444 t___-_ :i. ,,,, ,ri, n,_--74 1 -1,,,, A?Ay, c--,,s-, -,J 1 ),, -- 1 1 i /7 4ON1 MIME (Q. f • y p,„4.w77H0----=, -' -Y9 i i'",‘,‘ le.iit:C,j1,44,(1*-1t- „-. , __ CO a it /- 1, , ( )0,----y- I MC Q) \,.„I f \ CA 1 o''''''--1-- di Th? ( I 0 , CL 0 _ , fre ' _ .., A ,-,45, ,:, , , cioir , . , _,,., ,<,,,__,,,, ,-,-1.,0 (-, :, 14-1" * '' t`— ' rio ,i,,,,,.( ,1 1‘ 1 ,\,e,_.„1„ :,,,,,.. 4 As ,-. , ) .i,,,,,;-yd, ____, I 0 CT_) �, I �'J 41W-28,4, --04,,,b,---- 4 tif �r Lr_ ~ " I ° '. -Th .4°,'-',.......•.j.)\!•c?--""--- ---- / 04L 14---..rd 6 0 r'ci i 1 k 0 .'--.7- Ab ---' '.-L- ,--- -s,v"..11 ilh; w N....„4„.4. „__. 0 i ; __ .y v..40.. .. 4,„,,,ir,.,--\,,,tti 1 E 1, , ,,,, I C09L , • .II; -' . ci V ;‘;',' 14 sp.__ yr L ■ ■ ---------- , o * ‘;'”tet.Aii 44.):i''',, rC p I a. I CY 0 olY:, Jr ., _ O 1 gr. iiiiiroir .r., eft. , /l� 0 0 7e,Hreir 0 r-'- t ,Ai , / -- , - -CO / a, co 111 p OLL ' 0 ACf 14C I EXHIBIT B MO 11111 MN MN MS OM MN MN NM OM MI NM MN OW NM MI MI OM MO 1 -___/ ,i if 1 44 I ,k) Q :/ ____-j / / \ , \ \ 4. . r/, t 1 ii ( tit • ,�� \ 0 , '.- i ' ) ' ' iff .ih Par \\N, \\ -7 „ , 0 4. :/ i ,„ ,..,. ; A 0/4 A sik.„„,Aiii_ 'A ' 1 . / 1 , , iii If 1 1 / / i li\\\ 44// i A V I\ 1 0).57 4 k j \ I jf l/ 1 l' ":";;1 .' / . I / ' ) f 1 ED ; i , lifq / ( 1 , i k/ ../.• i / i f,f( ,, t-+ .i ,�, ! A , r?'2 „� R ) ) (I � ... \, ,,,,,, iili� ----p 1 / ;,TR' � M SI , ,- ��, Ii r `� .LTJ 1 ) ll ', i . .�,.,� , -41 Agra 1 ,,,. .,____w Jr r , r 1 ,.. 0 / ki 00 0 ° s � � CVI(ie/ � ( ( ( �j '°.8 P fir ' .. . '4." '2. 1 # r c :?:I ' :. a, 0. ,dig mi .. , I I i \ \ J ' il . I ' ,I.',/, (64 t i � i,' .,..2 7 u Q -- '06-r*, I , .� , r is :I /7j P 0 it o � ��� I I �g, f / I I . 11 I' 1 j 1 a•' kVA ° / \ \ pi / [ / i .... 11,f -‘soNpv_ / ! Tlill .... • ocxDo- \7 r / - i , ) , / , t- „ , 1 / / i fr,, . :, I (1,A i *., rf )1 . .... 0 / , / 7/ / ( 4. ,i z i aA - / /i ,* / / 4- / &1,// ( /4 /// ./114 ,-------) \ \' Ill/ '• 1 . 1 .1H ! / / 1 /11) 0 *. tat 'i 41 � ;/ 'Zr i; w _la , ' /.--\;` ......./' \-7f /7/ l o/ 4r \ ' ARIA 1 I ' D \144* Ili SOU N FEET 1Pr'.!:::.". I am am 1 IV fr) / . i / . . / /i / / i I, -\ .";;"; . %op. .. i„ h•. , ) 1 /441 I , b iv St , , I__. -- i �,o i LEGEND `r ! / N , ' EXIETMO 10 FT.CONTOUR I it / EXISTMO t FT.CONTOUR / AREA — �'-/ /I/ ! • —.._.._..—100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN 5 N'' ' / • �X ___.,--z-.."7-:,...‹:.740//„.." /,, —APPROXIMATE one OF DINT } r 188V—<" --,,..L. �` /' j/ ✓ PROPERTY LME • ��.. — — 1 DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY X ,�/� I / TREES 2 NMI NO OFF-SITE DRAINAGE FLOWS CD _/ cuENT LOCATION i SHEET TITLE \ ( I SCHOELL Dc MADSON, INC. /a„' a'wr w rvTvera rric a, 2 Q PRIME Q PRIME AMPHITHEATER EXHIBIT C rHOEL . .IAD ON HFa aleor 71POMMON NO ROT I MI A ow' m EXISTING DRAINAGE — — o*==" "ic' 1""e"' ` °'MINNOW& MEW YORK,NEW YORK SMD CREEK&LOUISVILLE TOWNSHIPS, NN ee300 SCOTT COUNTY,III AREA MAP Te12 ":-...1%....7..%."7.) MTE: AUGUST 1999/ J / \ ., I \ua[: Neo.Na an N MN NE IIIIII NM MI MN E 11111 NB V MI M 1111111 MI NM IIIII N 4 ,,( , . .6 ___/ : .// /41\_ii ;---,_y 1 1 : i pii� ( oil a / 0, VI .I. ,. 7/ lig - ii4 t \ . \ ihrN, j‘ 4' j 4 4 li:../..)/ I,/, I::bir; i_ :�� _,:s_._k, b 1 _7 :::(1\\\\ \\(1\ iN. 46 : i t t ! -,,c---,:„, -_-_-==.:1--,-,,, \ `, 1 , . , , , ' 7 ‘‘`Ak ' - .1 - I •-.\ /i4/ , „ , vi\ _\ , / ,,,,,!:::/,') � � I k t'.* .. .. ,i i iii :',, //fill / if i �� /� v i\k 111 ; , ,4,441.i. ,,,,,, ) , „.„ _/ ,it..... \A. I/ ---e• • -,_ , 11 \ 1 ' \ \..\ // ://1 / p Arl il'v ' 4 -- •,..., , III ; , ftZlik k \ t 7,,'‘-44 II CS : //i' ' 7--- _:, ��' . •!.. ..-1 iIT � ,����.�.� - _: I I �, r�� . \ III/ 1. "61--- oni,147 Oitliti. ‘fAtfr if- 417-7.All**:-.,:(0. • . ' // :if /7'11/9 �I. A � r-_ 15:.' � , Tri..4 iiiiiiitl IIS ri: ��� a1 i 1 : �: it l � �riA' n tf4' �' �4 0,‘ , i , , �d 4-0 l -sly,_" �' f � y,i i . i 1! l 1 ://y7. w i' i m( :' fir wirgit i i I , , , i 4 IA de r'''' ' ' ; i 1 1 Ill ' 1 i" , , / * I /.. , ./�. itANA A 1� .� ► _,;--• / pt. / to; 741i4== 1: fly rirp, f , i,„ ' ,z, / iii i i ziz / , /4.,/,'z it.L, .1/„ : ' 6 G o C)3(I/ 1 - 4 i,11 ilk/ ! il 1 11:A 1 4,1 1 C Si Ci /V l, II k,,,i ,.1. annraalra.MOWN HUI! �, � : &t /At/ ,/1,,t tit • / 11 'l�% ,V 4 tie, _ /,r /4/ // l'',,,* Sil t / t , ' I PA fik ' AvOir- ri--5--------1---77.2.7—=-7::"=".----7-----747K-N__,----------- -"-------'_N__---7-zza% A AferAdigr ti-Cri-',fir.-- •' irs w e r. ! .,. or_ , - ' . - {�: I .„ ,r - -,i... - �� � �!� "moi =l„ 4, /7 i /7 / / a ill. I 111 \ ri/ „, Is ildir:/ . 1/ I i SEE IN nu /// 7111 lilt /14 :L/1'1:'1 *16114 (j ! 1411;AlLf-ownvii.:11:4.4.-i::::7117-.—.'"":47.-1174:2 � , �:(1:rtij4"�)11:://7"r4:-. -7/ 1://:11::;;11/ LEGEND1 ftisi.444,44%, �=�- �I EXISTING 10 FT. CONTOUR 73 4// Orii lit. r � �'� . j / EXISTING z FT. CONTOUR . % ` •' PROPOSED 10 FT. CONTOUR 7dlit /'/`se �� '\1�/j;••� PROPOSED 2 FT.CONTOINi /I��I• 1� - / —..—..—10O YEAR FLOOD PLAIN, rn `'` �_ i/ / (` - — — APPRoxIMATE EDGE of DNR • .`1� " / /it MIETLA I 4'IOP X � ; / � - Z / 1 / PROPERTY LIlE \ DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY CO 0 :/ CUENT \ / LOCATION ( SHEET TTR.E / e. I SCHOELL ac MADSON, IN �alr w;nvTA,m w al "'"� Q PRIME 0 PRIME AMPHITHEATER EXHIBIT D ena.EL .s�Ar AD .nAnlno 1120141 a.a`aoll AIO 9MT LAM A 00Y PROPOSED DRAINAGE '°"`�"°'�" 'E"`504.11325 13103► 'T °1031113240114/MICE"�'� N�YOIMC,ISW YORK snip CREEK t LOUISVILLE TOWNSHIPS, — — '0660 MINE,ToiA 56306 ' CD wTe , ,� 1999_ scow COUNTY.NI J AREA MAP J I °'�'::'„ ,,,, �;°'°j �,E IEa. MS NB NM N = IIIIII NM IIIIII IIIIII 1 IIMO 11111 I E I n N 1. at ik Rio `i U E • 1 4' i i ; d / I' if 4144. �■fwwY, _ 1 , ° 100 200 300 4. / / 1 • ► • ► • ► • ► • ► • ► .. a. .,.e. . .0 .‘•► 4.2_</ / •• a / .' ••••••'�. •tl ' f• o o ' o .00 .o I ' ,tis • J 1 , `f� a 3 . 1 w Fw• w. 1 '21'w W w 1 IF ► ••;• a• •", • • • 4-•;''''w W W W.". - • ;a. W ,y- •i-K- 'k.3-, a 0 I t. 1 • 1 • 1`,•• • Et �W E�2i • �-F W 1e _� x�� •• 4 W.-'44,y w� w .l, lK '''-'.1,14,01'.2 y K-w' X- ,,44s.tz ►' 1 r' 1 �•A• '••i •*., .Kai�ie R.- i+i.eK' W W- ► •2 = Ww r a ° q.>< Wg _ �' K,4 K-4. �I' Ww'� • • WW4 41 WW AkKq a 0 •• , • ► • . • �' P ppq` •te :„..,45,4e, o�qq F-w v*"ia-,, , N'= �r-S-, K i•R 1 fiG•, • iWa,y P,� W-k'-N .� _`y w• k�w W 9101E NOHT / ( (� 1 1 4►:.. .' ,,_ '� �t vc -14. W tom- .4 ,4F 44- 4 I RIM lac 1 . v. W a `, ''" s a ff',A aX`q a•a"�W 7 I .-s ,_ W..„-.47,1„...4..K,yWK w,� tv,.-•.104 00. r, W ,y=F. ;-,,,�lwx`K, •,,;-,.,‘y'FK 1 _ 3 W. �7KW. ''..'4'..T.:`• 1 • .1.24E '1E / a. a .4.1*•i p� ` Kx�"� , • t K a1..'4,w•W�c�aK �l' I. . 1 •/t 1 I► _W ^8,-- 1'y. w4.-- "• .,x- ��7:. Y,4. •••••• 1.' 4.14,_'k '^yFK- .nt 1 ,J ollnwcc r w� w y- wfw j".4.. ww w- y" w,. • "��a N aw •f-.:••-f,„V „a i • 1,2 ''''',f1;41 .N • 1' •�v -ta �`j'+� W w•: y'_ / .Xaa y�" �I'..-w.- W w •6�� `"t ,., �°"' �KIK Yt./ � r.-" �F y'S -�t '4 .,w. • .0:14?"-2411.4,4.04,4i,, �,/04,: ..,,,,c,,,,,,..'♦ w w F'7' .•nw1 1 a p. .`� 3.5,17. 14,-- 77 ' -"4...,,,,,.....4,4-1:e lass . -.t, ,,‘.0.'-':=..-:s!.‘:: w: aW y;: �, • 1 • , .. � PPP }t e" E F E E ° ° a' 4A' .'O. a o o . o a 1.- E E "" / O O .O A t` Fai A O0 � O a " ° p )) E E EE " EE S i ; ! E E " 8p ; • E E * /a A MPHITH E A T E R EE E E F E ../ J BUILDINGS ► 7�'�it E E E E EEE E E E E 1 % / OETRY GATES OFIXED SEATING, RBOACKSaTATGEAGFEACRT M • 8 E E E E E� 6 P . , • , E E E 4 E * 4 E E E �_ • 4 ®REST ROOMS• ► 1 �E � E E E4E E E �� v ©FOOD & BEVERAGEE ©FFI0R0S0ADEYERAQE,E 4 E � �4 .� waEEE E / / / OADMINISTRATION OFFICE R,,�„9 �Yxx .�_�/E � E E 'E .y. Y� � � � / •// F r� E g ®GUARD HOUSE i!. OLAMI CHAIR RENTAL , I 10DEOP!0 TEAACSTERELASRES ZFI... .4.4it,... * KIOSK MNTROOM/ * ? DENOTESA88 PARKING� �) /1//1IEE//��/EF EE /. IwFy/k1�yEEEEEEEEEE E/y/: � E w �LEQND V, - x. (• / MIGHTnEIL /• E E 'a DENOTES ANE /r ,■ DEN14.4TAECSREGR8AVEL E ( � \ //FE EE E 80.88 ACRES • 1■vv F r /f NOW ror At I E, , '.--....-,-,4,-:24-;,,, DENOTES HARD SURFACEFEW as IW -------0151210 T 'LEFT TAW weIiii�. stn., 15.48 ACRES ` Ill N >C ——_ DENOTES POND -% 5.47 ACRES o CLIENT LOCATION SHEET TITLE / I SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.\ /1 ,�r,c ,�0�10`,W� 03 Q PRIME Q PRIME AMPHITHEATER EXHIBIT E •6 •^ ° °"`°"'"°'"'"""O"""'.■"DULY NEGOOTIED NNW YORK,WE YORK >�,Em10.nena.o/rK UNDER THE LAIN OF 11E EFATE OF ININED3TA. ,� SAND OEM a LOUISVILLE TOWNSHIPS, SITE PLAN — — ,ae00 0"a 00 OULEWAD.SLAM, 1111.1 SCOTT COUNTY, (012)x7001 FAX 148-1006 DATE: Aucusr 1999 \ / \ J \ I 'O0"' J \aae FEE w. J m I N 1 WI 1ni Z J t c1) p N a) a via �'� Q Q O as O O U) a) Qco rE I E. o WI i o o ,_.cV C CO N ° E o cu p NCD — Il > C 0 O � C6 ' c c c Q p L O C Cl)+ �(14$ .4 .O No Cr m � co Cl) co o �I i w •... as - if 73,:: 2 2 2 2 c::. (D> I cow cs JCD � �CL W O � n >. nID � cuoo ff- ma) a) -CI 17, (1) 4=1■� _ .- __ � oow222c� I mic y- •- ■� U) alla 0CCOD00cuCl) 0 < < 00W222 (0U) 1 MC t) \ / / —C2. VS1 1 Q _ . „___ ,_ ,„,,e,,, ____ _c.._ < ____ , __,.. ___ ._ 4,. ..,.......,I a) o z co _______________ ________ __________ „ ..,,_____, l'illitall, E ill q, 1 ■. - t - 0) _. 7 e, L Ia, •.... __________,__ 1Alla 0 .40..... _ � , cl v or .., I 0 L 'II( I OEN I EXHIBIT F MN NM OM MO MB NM MI MN N MN MB MI MN NM NM MN MN MN § . ____//1 i i 1,. xi i / 1 t 1 tki. 0 : / \--1\—.—i i A, A, ,- •' i; 4 j ' - i/A' ti .4( i ,;/,,,,, i , \\ \ O %7 ; ,. r► �i�.. '=� a► \�� 1 1\ i /i i i \ ,i, , i: . : : f i als .s6 1 I i 4 ) . t,t;\ \\ i ( / / \ \' i \ / 4111 I ll �n• / o I / '' i it lk, .11111Pr / , / ) ii if \i '4„: ,/:/ 11 : , . ; ;,,i',,,1 )11,\ '� �, ° III ) 1 / ,..//// ,:// / / , !j." ;I ...• , 0 II, \ ,( i i 8 . PI \ 1 I/1 jill 11 i e k ) .,,. , i , , I ,__/ 1,,,d , ,, \ i c., , ,,,,,, , , \ I. d/i/ L.„ ......:: :' ,,,,,, I :I/Aiwa" , \ 11,1, q ! , lift . 4 ,........, / / A...... .. ...........„...,... , ; . "� yy 00 O ° 6 I y am°` ° I dill I tio , fir i if b. 1 e..._.„ a \\\I „,,./7„.„,,,, /: „,%,. :f I ."--111 .. -•, •••••I 1 i * ) /\. :ill lit ' / el illi; . 0/ , , ° ,E ', tltl y ? o ! I . '� '1 9 I ,,ri / o. '''1 1 . ..” . , lailvi' - i 0 C:::=:) 0 000 0 --- . "--.23 ,. t , „ , ---/ ',1----Ir 10, r 0/ li 41 !. f1jiiiii -------J " ) ‘..„ 11 o ç 4,4 I IIQ y I //1 / / w4Rs•-e „„, , , t 1 Pr rff / , i,,,. ..... iAr ' / i , / s , / 0 100 700 300 it -fie/ 4, \TI 1111,,.,,-- . -•-k,--_ ._:-J____', .-.t., 1 ; 0 r__ _ _. `,....._ ------_,_) rititl I fy/ // '0 '. ;444,14, / 1 / O I // ±___,---"___.---;:----'"--2'jr) ,i. 1 . s „. 0 , , • i,L____s___,_____ ...._.....,_ i % / ///// rli ' j j c” LEGEND _ i - 1 EXISTING 10 FT. CONTOUR 1 I EXISTING 2 FT. CONTOUR �' � ..Niiii % —••—••—100 YEAR FLOOD PLAN, 0 1! .• / __.moo �� �,I�.,/ cr)ro i /� ,- ��� ( — — — —APPROXIMATE EDGE OF DNR /rd �� 7� WETLAND 210P 1 8 • .'��__ //'' ' PROPERTY LINE o X nai / TREES T ,„... ..-4,17:9 7 1 4, / ■ DENOTES STEEP SLOPE CD ( CLIENT LOCATION \ / SHEET I SCHOELL dt MADSDN, INC.\ /1;:t"�v ar..v'rw r 1 a uwm w� m 0 PRIME Q PRIME AMPHITHEATER EXHIBIT GI 0�•a •R»•«� 2.,.....,...:A;M MIMI EXISTING FLOOD PLAIN & '°"'�""'A 11OUL IO,SUM M u..OF M aac u.orn NEW YORK,NEW YORK SAND CREEK&LOUISVILLE TOWNSISPS, — , 1r� aunt SCOTT COUNTY,NII STEEP SLOPE PLAN ee�o. (.,z)��ao, FAX a.-.o.e / ` / 0 DATE: AUGUST 1999_,,/ J } I / \°� �" — MN 1 1 EN M M NM 111111 111111 MI r M NM ! NI r 111111 NM 1 1 Ct v 1 4, !I 11;( it 6 iiir 1 ala s. Nxi\\\1_ \. V ,\\ \ . • : ,- • ' j / ) r It i,-J- C)11111 Lioor' r, /, V\ ' ' ' \ l. ' / 1r / :, „.-- -(;:-.,---- — ____ '--__ -,,,.., , , / / ,,,,;;;-,=:_-_-;;-_-_-_-__:____:_-_:-_,,,::\'', ir ',. 'i ' ) t \ alb ,i-,* ,,, , , ___:::::___;-:.- ...,„,... 1,,,,,T. ,,,\i;,. .,, ...‘ a.i 1 \\,1 \ , \ .c--D . il '/1)/1'47(1 ,':`,‘;',(: 1\ ' . ' ,..\./././ � �.,- ISI ///// ,,iii ' <\//;., "_-- � III.11 1 i ,„„„, . ,,,,',\ ,:\..\. 41 ,,,ci /,/,„iyiiim . . , i s vt„. ,111 ) ,Ill \\ j ,t , ,1 rut --_ --- '/ atm t 171• -..e0-#17b=iw-=':.,. -_ -ir -it_it2-__---- -.=1 ri ,1 (: ,.r.,,,,,,, , „i ,,rill' � cam' --; '' ' ( i r *: , 111; i ' ! 1 i . . t, . i ,,,, ,, 41 ii ,/ 'i i f,,,, piapellIllk.00 . , ,!If TOQ,1-1-1- —; .1 _ I E / A Mr Walaill l' , ir A .7 lif 7 . ,,,,':! A \ O iir iti r �����>yigt,...... "4. ii- I i '..---,I 1 Majaill . \. / Anti \ : 1- � � , Ill I 1 I . 1111 �' �� iiii. /../.1 1 44, AWAY i 'i l4it ' i , 1I i i i i — !.Ir1 ,'-„ ; ' lippl ? ti , li '" ' �. r 0'6 14.R tij I i /,,(: ,fir ir,Cr,ii , I ‘: f TI) 4,"!.., . V 0, • i 4 I 1 q // / ik ; liZ ..4; /1/ 4 I ollitii �(14- , ./411,,,,„,„„s„ . 1,0,k. I IIIA''' 7 Y � ,�� Aik '" H':,litt,ii iff i A � �� �/ /1 11111466.ilt ,:0 I f 'i / ,' r J.4.6... - , ,, :i i.‘,. •-:;.-7-,,.., -, _111,, 1,-Wileari s'...=-;''-:--...---.-'7........r--,----7047-00-&---N,-.=-77:-.----="3?----Z4 1 ; it :4;1th. ' OA l // / / / //1 I IA ��' 111� - � / % p ipp zpo apo �l/ qp „, >' ,....... ,, ,..,00/,, ,,,h.„, ° RET 0�� • i• I �'r71 (iii / ./-i /: / _ _ ^ 4 �,17 ` // / / LEGEND 61:----0-1- I �ilk. v 1/11;1/111111114 � � �� � �� � / - EXISTNG 10 FT. CONTOUR i. i `! /a �� %% ' , �' //i/ EXISTING 2 FT. CONTOUR Il1 ; ���'� -l1 i/ PROPoaEo 10 FT. coNTouR / � �'`�:5 ' � PROPOSED s FT.coNTouR I J ` i _••_•._ 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAN, .� ELEY■726.0 a ; ;' ; / ice \♦_•- /P - - - •- APPROXIMATE EDGE OF / % / ��� o \ %�� DNR WETLAND 210P rn it PROPERTY LINE • t / �`� ......._..?_______ Y uy 1 / J IIIROCKTOUT CROPPINGI / _ MAXIMUM PROPOSED GRADING CO i / / SLOPE IS 2.6.1 TO SEI. J 0 — LOCA-nal I SHEET \ / SCHOELL do MADSDN, INC. /"4'Y 7.11”n 'ru" 'c"an°"� vT'N Q PRIME Q PRIME AMPHITHEATER _®_ °-' "MAC".8ETORS'"`55MC THE V ANNING COMET■"O°`"'°"NE TW I w DULY BAIL TESIEIo.WYNONaf.L , IEGISiERED FlIpR,lpNV.ENGINEER UNDER 4E PROPOSED FLOOD PLAIN 10580 wauTA■OULAWCI,SUITE 1 "E "'°F"` "h°E WE°O"` N!W YORK,N!W YORK SAND CRIDC&LOUIiYLIi TOWNSHIPS, WINEYONICA.■" 6 SCOTT COUNTY.Mw J & STEEP SLOPE MAP / (0 12)�'° J DATE: Aucusr ,999 I AIF:. REG.Na 1 N 11111 EN IN NM I 1 111111 En 11111 I I EN 1111 N 111111 I MI e = '\ /__-/ ‘ § t'), c, ---- ----------\\J--/ J1 J ..1.. ,'(� //// if 1 SSP 10 'IS i e14111* \\\I\ h 1 71 • ,,,li •\\% \\ \ - j ' ,..: ' 1 ,' �r ! � , / ft / „•-, „:::,-...,_-_,._,__. ::::_z_.-.,..... ., \ __ft, i , \ \ ,,,, A \ ,. ,-,, ,,.:-.-:....a.::: „, / \ \ T n ``�\ yyy \\\ IP+ , \\‘‘ 1 1.ki 7' '...4, 1 `1 ll��-�- ://,i1:111 l/ / /• ' ` 1 ,1,, \ \ l�/ rl I ' /' -_'' 'i„,..,41,..III `• \\\ , / f 0", ' 1---- ! h, I ,,,,,, 1) N11 i , ' / / / �� //! 'l,�ll i 1 k i-;, "An,F" yy +41,44,2 'g' $j. -.-��` 1 \ 1 \il 0.^- '� "lit llrl ,x .1/l 111 �/ 1,llll �\� ' •• "�. N wwxW�� \I �44�ywy �, ( IIIA 1 / / ` IV,' t �... 'wtx hex Yy * •se, � r .x- 'L l �l 5,., l „\ ' j wraz az ,f 1, Az s w 5,Fz :. ,.f^ o� / •„ 1.r.-�i' 4634t i .,L� m,•A K' v 1 II \ \ \ \' �� 1, � `� ,� .�yq y}�`= nPA-404- r Irk y`" ,,-.4,,,,,,t,..:, •3 �: � � nwi u1c TWEE MUT \ I ` '"z' y- y'y.w.41 . a, * -.4: rti IF i q � f' 'Th)11 ) r ,Fw Y._1w. "x )344' x.1 r �' i-.; j `_ �� I 17414,4 , t' w_•r ,.` N w ,filth ,.m �.<.rSt-:W.f3 .... ..5. _' 1,V '� tYw yr ro � 2 w :f/.S � ffim��a�aa�:•�+r"ss.. _ � ` . ‘Voi pr.Ili...4W „i r IT, r -7 ;44/ 1 �` r{,Vic: .,..1:1:7,,--x t a ��a,, Iz*a�� P ���"w''`'`w ,-.. .4��iitir ,--... `� � n IJ 1� � /I/ ,/ '� / ` � =�it!�/L���.� `...'�/� P�� �' 1� I �� "Eer __ it4 ,. /pi ," / . f 1 //, , 4 -e �_—tr. gAgmli., ��.1!_ xC I _ iit,,i,.��[!. 11 iI�I I ill / );41 II��. ihirr t 11 � � _�{� / nrwi:Q///{/, �7 Jill, �� 11 ,n� Tf�y. aL�� / ^..��,, w./� 1 la t 1;.41;4. ! A Uk�� fir i '' -401 .1 I , . .h.,.. i tk,a, . --....4.L.:„:„, 4/ 1 1 . Ili lil 1 i ! f ..... ,Ar".16 ill -:-111:7-: r ::-'' If 117 i ' - r) : ._-_ ,,,elo Q "ra I ' T-C7 1 fif i r IF ei FL* - -. v ))i) • , 5. V ' / r4LA' '''P'4". it. 1 "al 4 i 4// f ,,,,, 4,, 1 /. ! iti/ , 'Ai:: / ift IIICCNOW KW i 17. I A A ,1 0,....,..........Tr'44 ,, i , i i 4 1,4 A. , , ii,,,i s ?IL 1 \1\41,„4 if /,,„1' ` �R-may, y°e' �' .__ ' %. iikt,*.1��. __M-_=_ ^ =;ter 4/ ,, —It v ,t,mi rar. ..5,.. ..........-7----.0;:f-b-- --,„.------.2.________----_----_:_—:4_:--------fr...-_sl--,--1 ,„ / i ,.., ei ,---4-11-1,-.. k. ...t • il .4,______01,,, '"'''*p.'ilk„i. ', 1111 . / w c / I �4-4,1,4'4?-14140,Aktlir4",..,/,,,a, -c-'rfi 7 / ! „ „,,7i 1 I i v'ea i rr - - ,\--,-1--- ..',, .'...._,,;,....'-'--'_.....,---------(.7.4 -:,1 ;f1,14,4*, �I I i 1ji' :r , �it , o ,ao aoo 300 nu IN i .4 ' Vi.. i / la I . MOM Una.737.0 --'1 I I/ ^- ''' (f% Ar -0-4, ,,,,-; / , / ,_ '4--'1 I 1 icgralit / ' 0/4i ../ " , 1 i'— ,1 ,i(,,, i 1,ii'vrit, ( dp-,, 1 i , )„, 31, . / ‘I 1 /'I i __•�; 7 , 11::111 C\�� ' •/ / / f LEGEND o j1( I l j i �����flit,^- r / p/ EXISTING '10 FT. CONTOUR ✓�/ t//l ��ytx ' r / l1�� � � zf Ali ii ,' l / i f6EXISTING 2 FT. CONTOUR ' >* ;= J } PROPOSED 10 FT. CONTOIUR IF - �``� ��� ,// i73 PROPOSED 2 FT.CONTOUR or �s i / — — —100 YEAR FLOOD PLAN, Z / . _°",-* �-•-I/ : n wart niio,° icELEW726.0 rn l / A, i ce "�� ..k,1/4 r_ 0P OF DNR N / 1 L ',/ �f' 1 1 rn /! `� / � I /a - , . PROPERTY LINE ■ ' ■ �� `- At /' aAMW--4)--....„4„4., PROPOSED 8TORM SEWER /\ _ �� Kz PRCPOBED IMPERVIOUS 1 9 _ / / .�±w1# z .SURFACE J\ } mom -./ CLIENT / LGCATION SHEET TITLE \ SCHOELL & MADSON, INC\ iponr w ner�r�c a u' a,w� mmi = Q PRIME Q PRIME AMPHITHEATER EXHIBIT H o .l,.N[70,..PUNNING T3~51101,„0,0,40.27:4041,54,3-(1, m PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACES �`�" � nc MINNETONKA.101 50300 NTMI YOI1K,HEMI YORK SAID CMS i LOUISVILLE TOWNSItpNI, — — ,ae.osua, M um cc we saec or rworti J SCOTT COUNTY,101J A OFF-SITE DRAINAGE ROUTE J c•,� J \ om ITE: AUGUST 1999 IIIIII M 111111 MN M M M MO MN M UM MN S M IIIIII M IIIIII N M I tar • / / F` 1 / ,--_______/ 1 / . j •I � I / 1 •\c's."-----"'- ' '-' -----A, 1t ■ .-1\-•-.' 1:-. / • 4 '‘, ! i POSSUM •'- i „,,,o''''''':.>- 10 II MU is It / 1 I a I r • H I. I. 1 1 ,` 4 / n / 4 c IP / i A o ioo mo xo lVIE N rQS ,?. ./.2j /741,45y Ify LEGEND / PROPERTY LINE / 9 EXISTING WELL LOCATION • • i = /,.•""-------- `\ (/ 1 M � 11011. X . = o \ -� cum" \ 1 L�� � / ��TtTI.E \ // I SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.\\ ��r r�ra r�i i�arr'µic an m�w� _ Q PRi ME 0 PRIME AMPHITHEATER EXHIBIT I °'°'e°a'""""°'S'""""° °""""°�'°""'°"" '"" ,7,ThE NSW YORK,Rim YORK SAND CRTC ak LOIUYLLI TOWNSHIPS, — — wcTo VMYZA«� 06506 � .� WELL LOCATIONS (612)!/6-7001 era:are-6066 DATE: MAY 1999 SCOTT COUNTY,IN WELL JI •nra4c horr,x+w-oem / \‘....,ve1610.NM I = _ _ ,NM 0 I o II NM O _ I O 3 v •_ c 1:3s / _ ' L . 0 a� Z 30v) I C EOM I co E a) ac� ll t- C) 0 E .c / \ ci. L CD CD I I aS M � . 1.:1.1 Co "E; N 1111.. :1111.. C 1111.. 11111.,, =IC .1.101 :010,11 C 0 • ...111 .1.1111 0 .110111 1111111 11...1IMM , . . t;.„ i -I „It* •sik-e i I -1-0 (A) 111 • � �'' � ;� ti�iu 1:;iii,i ,,1114:411_ L L :y ,� r _ 14 !Fart1111 1 �1�'3 ►i 11 � 11 ' i .it1111 1,,�--�11 'l . , 411W W 1 Cli ali; d -iviritm�p�r= II».N,■• 1 roil 'I _. 40„. 1 = 1♦` 1 :► rm l• twin iii:i_ i,it ',rail! ���. �4•% go 1ito�mop 4•,%.71.k..”?�, 1:-2.• „ 1� 'T. 1 :a:y -7T .__1,1. 'tel= 1 9ai LL 1. � ' •� �, � ut��;{:1ii�c! i ..i' t� Li �� �, ma=r paimii..r � --_ 1 dEI , 11,11 lil'i li _.aRi i ..I��',111MN 1 ; ' "moria Nil:gaE 3_BIM`� _ ...1 - 1 hili �:, 1 11 sta {I iik, _ _ _ I I E 2 _ , digiill _,,kw,.... ....ir imporlvi . __ _. _ A1a.':• P1.;. _—_ yid 1 di oil. 1I r��5.:•� � �\II,.��� _ .�_�: is._I��_ nom■ =i L`�';1.giil.p r;:.•i� � iIIIN='` J- 1111 1111 41101. =i ''',0111 y------�II1'1',.., IIIiIII I{� - Lim :i • mi. >lik ': ''.:-,iii,ivi ti 'rr„ gy C .11 1 `_ _■ _ e � h '47161,111,,,,,,_ „rat'ILI a isagew— • i' I III 0... II... a iii 111:R'IIIIIIKIII' III, prill11:-; 11- . .�. m. - I Cf (1) C.) 1 gat s........ .-ii. r iii !:■ MD ra1Li :.. - I cr) EXHIBIT J I I = �0.. c O c ca o ° W O C� o o a 1 - 0 ca s a) Li 5 o 1 i \ •— = u) N 'Ec� L CD 5 -0 c 0 CO 1 = L 0 .0) ca co O U L. CO c -a —1 c g Z I CD Mo X1111111 m 4/0W a - ''6'I: 4- m En- 4111>141 1111 , W W W ji{ 11111111 I 0.0.1I I ch (14$(11 C3) Num. ,// / i / 1 sO • /lime _. a ..___ ,.1 ._ O , z-- _z_ S i I N CCi) I Ui ... �� � \, / y-- 1 C.) • Ui Ew 0 - �%a.)• .f. ,r ___.„ 111�111111111/1/1111 ,��111111111• .11�1/11111�11/1, I . .. ,,, \ ..._L , . li. cf-1 ‘, , 1� � '. 0 I I �> -11Z11*. n -- � 1 EXHIBIT K E UN E En 1 — i — 1 V M M 1 — 1 1 A MI 1 1 I 1 1 J ®R 1 ILL ' ', ,;1, I ,.,,im ... 4...:1---7 44 414 /i , „'''('''‘ / ''''.11M (ifif 44 al. 4.1. &,./ 4,i,)); /rif DNR ,4 t f iir WEILAND 210P 41., 44 i' / ,If 0 __- 4,14 411. 44 /.„ i , i,///1/ 11 ,,,,,,„. i /0 ,....„ , 16: . , ,,,, Ap.,,, gio 1111 1 4, I 4, //1,37/' i. 41 i ' Apr i II/ / AI . 4. 4, il / p.tir'. `..• .13 iff ,, ,,,,,,;:rft...;7_,.......,. 44 44 A1i2 r :s‘:10, '# d�// ,%I). . 4..1 ) • ,e} •qJJiii' ' t ' ' / //.' , f /l lVr !1 i 1 1� 40,,, "1 /! �e, /, jlr 1 . ( I ' l , 1 y i 7.,7 ' \\,` 4 _,,in 1,#- DNR ��. �;' in. WETLAND 210P 1 / ...4._.,`'/ i I ��If�/ ,ru)lri / .•lit ._. ill,,, 11 1 , ri . .... -- —w ; 1 f i 4 1I Cillik ,/ �: ' _ • rrf, � a /1 i , II;f ST Ili I It =Pr , E r If II!.; ir4,... A_ + A 1114?iii 0 100 270 300 lii oil/ ' . si ,, 11 V '' Oli ' ' ': #4 flitt, 1!1 1 • . #77 // i. <+ cik Altill LEGEND f' f l2� �s'% f ! �ll, , EXISTING 10 FT.CONTOUR /, !l , EXISTING 2 FT.CONTOUR )7,111.4i / PROPOSED 10 FT.CONTOUR _ 1f1/r1` ' `, I 41,01)/ t, PROPOSED2FT.CONTOUR Naoowr law ��! /,:: . J. : �I//IIh�kT j �.� — •— —100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN, 2liff ELEV=725.0 'f I I • �!I' 9 —APPROXIMATE EDGE OF DNR /f/ni'+` I ar r_ I �� I ii WETLAND 210P 'iiia; ` 141 1 1 � / ��PROPERTY LINE ca 71 ml X =. 2 = 000 2 i � �m ` / LOCA�N r SHEET ITU -. / I SCHOELL & MADSON. INC.\ /e�varrM a�it N^2 au�Ome Q PRIME Q PRIME AMPHITHEATER EXHIBIT L mime.i .{SI•..,a a.6'r.,7.ImI MC,,.R 1 AY A OILY NEW YORKEXISTING WETLAND&PROPOSED a'O 112 'mar• g'® a�"�nE vv _ nE TE ar nc•oac ar usmo� NEW YORK, SAND CREEK&LOUISVILLE TOWNSHIPS, SAND CREEK IMO 11202112 IMO \ AUGUST 1999 J \ SCOTT COUNTY,NIN J \ STORM SEWER OUTLET 2 \ 1 a,a � IC 0 C C tira I 0 0 •Ems vima co as 0 '- (1) 4.0 •IIIIIM RS >I u) 4a E ca Swim +WI i_ c) ct az Z% 2 a) I MI 1/0 0 2 0 = r 1::: .c A (1,) C ....1 nc • oz% a. (,) e tra 0 E lc I r C/D Eno -1-11 • 0 ... ,_ I I CZ$ AS . U) :0.14: 0 C113 M ' U) "CI cn AWN. C cu CD C 4•411414 ''.•:.Y.•:.:. = ._ I miC 0 WA? MM.: 0 L. ., , ._r -- 0 0 .40 .if , .., i-iilk n- o I "I—" 0 A - 1 I I I ----- 1141,16---- . filoreitoiii Ira1464,. ... , ,1„.„..., ,,, , :__ . ,.,. ,_?„ P ' '-)' pa' goalM Air fri IN mom Li, ip- . ' - st.. -,.` • II- a .'...;! - f k h,..• , lso •ei, ..., • I limic w 1 kiitylii-:•._„.4.cu.--._. hrooffiemil ot. , 1 -iri _ 1 A•2!,.. ,:t 1 1!-.- - - ; - - • •- .1ca..,.. ,t_...,....„:„. ,.. .,.,.„ ...„„.. ....._ ,7....iiilliriMialb:44trii Ei:illiata.inallia.7.-1 EIVI RI -1 1 _-. __ i : --- R;411111—Minel Miii -' - 11111Plia-I itil I I _, D' I •-"a' -.11."""", , • t 'V. . .III-11 • ' .- r'41L-Ir41 - Iffii, • 7.:0171'. 1 , hi w5 4111% •--- --- '. •°' I E C , Mal I UM et Igilk. IIII :11 41 111141-' .. III;4,..,.,.. ,111,PMIKI 111111111. 14' A....A: ' . 1 . .itIM:i..-.411 mi. - rui ri 0 r 4a P -: = ._ I • % ags.I .......- 7. , t.t.-.1. -4111,:41;.,41,110Hvisligt,6 .11601.24.1.:,.:7.. _.m7i,1 ilifil • ' fie. wile elm A it 1 .._ 44144.-aife.. ,......... . . w-rx-,... LEI i 1 1,rnimil iii 0.p.. , - . ,7.244 - 1,71,1 ti:- I (D 0 iffAriiri .111.64 pou h "-Tiiiift OR iiiik 4 1 li.11101 1 0 L°g I till Iii II J ' .1.--,--1 - i- -: ' _ 1 I E 2 ,._ , ... op 1 ,i0Thi 44.1111,44NE eitrveligsmiikalor . loin - r, iii , NA/ni ink_ nimbi I • •1111 >11) mlm• A Rililii.ir 1 m..„ pi 1 fir10 eli 11 0 • Egel - N 1 a A I I MINIUM N , tif.iiiiii J I IM I A- -17 @ilia:fins a ! .-211111tteitflell41 IIIP.i.her _ .PdP, Fr,..,- 74 - 1 1. • viva! ' ,st4;, it4s,.. . 1.• 7.1:4114•1410_ Al.... am h-\,. ,..ranarintegt, wi• Isla. Hopis . - ,_.., --, idi I om. •mi. XI • • 11-ei wimp ,- 'UNE , Ilir il VallkibillillilliiiiIILIM•ili%NY Lig -I _ 1111111.01110111111" D 111111.6.-'gang"; --I s mom 1.4.11WINIVIII 1111311figinlifilim 11,1111- IIIRL'Illill SEIffimplow wi 11.111 I I mIlma 0. L .....,, I *n.". Willi IPPIIIIII Pie Ili. 111 _ ---TF,74,1.1 imitzaP",.,all .-1.1 si 1.. ir 16 -i. --4,41:zzlitisi N re I 0 ci) c ) ,_ Ih. 401114111 -. __ wo _ Li, NON Mi. II iii'L. , kii....wm.7. .-0-. I Ull) = 1 p..!...._ ,,. ei, ,,-., Adier-- , _...„ ...„,,,.:.._ , . . I 0 EXHIBIT J I C co c O o co O ° c0-1' } ORS E ca ) v > Q a (. (,) LL o . E 1CA mili ° CE � � coLL3U= I Simi mlW (X CO 0 li 12 —1 g °-. = c a3 W MN -01- ri —9 ct Lit 2 LU 1 ,Ia4.14 vicuW 1 0. :=, g 4— 1.11 X1111111 M 1 O w W iu 1 CC >41 ►.1.1.1.1 1.1.1 c) _ w j ,_/ I . 077 - � _y1 = w c---„_ .... 0 ,.. _____ _____ _ __ , 1 , , N 1 CL 0 , /, / , Cin . / f , u j \i ... , , . ./ -\\\ \ ,„ , 4- 1j ) Iil„,,___________, _____ a) 0 �•,,,____,/ ___„ _ foWeNeo -\„ /77 E 13 , 111111411/ .1111111I 111 \...a 0) .111111111111, „ ,.. \\,\„ • 1 a. CO \, -.. • .,1 a LLI , . 1I I 1 /� EXHIBIT K I I LN SI i o •lttttl '� i J 11111.11 N /111111111•_111/ c �a I �11�1j�11/ O ai �♦ *.• N /�1(r1`4,4�i.11;1 G) r C1 C S.. C:Li J:11II) 0 a �, I /11�'��11/`/'s111 ¢ �r r x o &.%•••,x1.:•1111 o c) N_ v ♦1111.11 d; a ) (11) /114 '11" 1111 N r r a ,,, o N 0 c) / ‘10114 o N C I CrIS /100.11 11 , = n a 11111,.11 N C N N o o r 11111111ttr4/1 G r Id _ 3 V /111' 11111 O G o m `r-) L I 11***#44•0 •;F, r CU M 0 cu a :111/ iii cii L 011) 0 1cl N cis N CD r d d! US r CL CL 0 I .c ar) a 9 e I' otf n >' >+ V L E as ctS+��+ cci N G! aLa G LL. LL c 1 7 r z 41 d C 2 '' L� . N a ■ a 3 -a = Loi d II "'chi: X m •3 J c c UNi ■ re _ o .� a 0 ° ¢ Lu c 1 in �n ix 0 W fX C r N N M Z 1- n Q 1- N V ...0 I O a a a a Q m _ n. OM , , - z� rIU ■ II MrI 0 DI E N ,,,_,„,, __,_. „, 404 z __ Ia) ,s,\\,... I ? , . _ci,) 0 , _ 1 E ) ---(-r____” I ` _ ■ f"-' f S I L- \, -1 \, 1 I C3 - r-4---,J, .R I ....1 , , ,.., /" , „ 1 ( - W , mt, r, * v I z 1 EXHIBIT M-1 I 1 ....••.•...... ca ,.•.• .•• - d w 3 d as =I cu 0 al Z c/' ICLE .•�•1' p�•�• L Lcti O tQ L 15. Lam. / CU ,.. ,...... I > ZZ ''>:-1 I L __ ..._ ,„, 2 ..........t...:?:::.:',...;:::::::: _ ,-c , ..., ::::........:::::,:e.§3........., 1 , F I ill/1k , - " CU 43) . . , 0) ... i � p --,_______,------ 1 ..c t • r, 0) i •mo. 7 I 1 _ t c",,, 0 --------- 7 r ,. ) ___-- 1 [----- _ h ___E a. i------- 11-- 11 - „, i.7 , ii 1 I *I < .....;:::._j_._L...„ . • ,ui-------------- - 4 i Ia) C ------ - -7---- ---Ii I = 7:3 ,....goof-----------------;,';.. 7,-,...„-,- --- •II= pm . --- 14.40:01',....::::;•:+t, It i i 1 114 ll aml M ---'-'- -- "4'0004 vemee,'S/ISSIleisele)X ......""---........< ,. 1 0 a L --_-_--K:- ______,,, 0.....s..oiliiii2 .__.:____ / ,, __L 1 I lim ; - '''tzt:414iiiiiiiiii f --) = . N N - I Cr) ,. N, •‘., .•„,. , „,... , . 1 1 ci EXHIBIT M-2 f. tMINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE ' July 23, 1999 Ms. Meg Jeffery Schoell &Madson, Inc. 10580 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 1 Minnetonka, MN 55305-1525 RE: EAW for an amphitheater and associated grass &gravel parking area T114 R23 S4&T115 R23 S33, Scott County SHPO Number. 99-3018 ' Dear Ms. Jeffery: ' Thank you for consulting with our office during the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the above referenced project. ' Based on our review of the project information, we conclude that there are no properties listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places, and no known or suspected archaeological properties in the area that will be affected by this project. Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36CFR800, Procedures of the Advisory Council ' on Historic Preservation for the protection of historic properties. If this project is considered for federal assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, it should be submitted to our office with reference to the assisting federal agency. Please contact us at (651)296-5462 if you have any questions regarding our comments on this project. ' Sincerely, Dennis A. Gimmestad Government Programs and Compliance Officer I I ' 345 KELLOGG BOULEVARD WEST;SAINT PAUL.MINNESOTA 55102-1906/TELEPHONE:651-29646126 EXHIBIT N ' EXHIBIT 0 CF ��rqMinnesota Department of Natural Resources of5(lU L duqcttc R: xl it h`� St.Paul.Minnesota 55155.4G MAT14�'�. ' November 10, 1997 Meg Jeffery. Environmental Specialist Schoell & Madson, Inc. 10580 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 1 Minnetonka, MN 55305 ' Re: Commercial Development &Parking Lots in Scott Co., T115N R23W Sec. 33 and T114N R23W Sec. 4. Dear Ms. Jeffery : The Minnesota Natural Heritage database has been reviewed CO determine if any rare plant or animal species or other significant natural features are known to occur within an approximate one-mile radius of the above referenced project. Based on this review, there are 15 known occurrences of rare species or natural communities in the area searched. Two of these rare features have the potential to be impacted by this development. Near the northwest ' corner of the project area, on the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge, is a great blue heron (Ardea herodias) rookery (concentration of nests) . When last surveyed in 1995, this rookery contained approximately 73 active nests. Although great blue herons are not rare, rookeries are tracked by the Natural Heritage Program because loss of such a concentration of breeding individuals would have a significant impact on the population. There is potential for nest abandonment if human activity occurs in the vicinity(within 500m) of the rookery during the breeding season(February through June). Generally, a 300m buffer zone around the rookery is recommended, within which no 1 human activity occurs during the breeding season (Butler. R. W. 1992. The Birds of North America. No. 25.) On the southwest edge of the project area. between the railroad tracks and the Minnesota Valley NWR, is a rare community known as "dry prairie (southeast). sand-gravel subtype". This piece of prairie is locally significant, as very little of it still occurs in Scott County. We encourage you to consider including preservation of this site in your development plans. On November 3. John Baxter of your company called concerning the presence of eagles near the project site. We have searched our database, and to the best of our knowledge the nearest eagle nest is approximately 21/2 miles from the development, and should not be affected. ' The Natural Heritage database is maintained by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. a unit within the Section of Ecological Services. Department of Natural Resources. It is the most complete source of data on Minnesota's rare, endangered. or otherwise significant plant and ' animal species. plant communities. and other natural features. and is used in fostering better understanding and protection of these rare features. 'JNKllll.>rm:u .2'X7. I-Slut-?(d.-oliU;1 • Tr::hi_ '_`ii-i-.\.1 I-?il(inti'-i'!•" 1v0..1(1-it..I,uln.1,11,1,s, A ,'u.it..= •,li„.,I.:-1'.::;,,.nw,,.n,r, . '•Y h„b'.du.•,Ih, ,..,, to/ ‘11.1,111.1a.1 :. 1':1,,l %%J.: 1 The information in the database is constantly being updated, but it is not based on a comprehensive Pd rehensive P survey of the state. Therefore, there are currently many significant natural features present in the state which are not represented by the database. We are in the process of addressing this via the Minnesota County Biological Survey (MCBS), a county-by-county inventory of rare natural features, which is now underway. Because survey work is in progress for Scott County, our information about natural communities judged to be significant by our program is quite good for that county. The MCBS survey work for rare and endangered animals and plants is less comprehensive; it is therefore possible that occurrences of these features exist in the project area for which we have no records. In addition. because there has not been an on-site survey of the biological resources of the entire project area, it is possible that ecologically significant features exist for which we have no records. , Thank you for consulting us on this matter, and for your interest in minimizing impacts on Minnesota's rare resources. Please be aware that review by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program focuses only on rare natural features. It does not constitute review or approval by the Department of Natural Resources as a whole. An invoice for the work completed is enclosed. You are being billed for map and computer search and staff scientist review. Please forward this invoice to your Accounts Payable Department. I Sincerely, I Karen L. Cieminski 111 Data Manager I Ecologist Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program (612) 296-8319, FAX (612) 296-1811 karen.cieminskitoidnr.state.nm.us ES # 980283 ' end: Sand-Gravel Prairie Fact Sheet I I I I Travelling Gun Irrigation Systems: I Travellinggun systems consist of a large sprinkler (biggun) mounted on a wheeled cart Y 9 P which is mechanically moved across the field spraying water. The big guns typically Idischarge between 100 and 600 gpm and will irrigate a radius of 80 to 250 feet. There are two types of travelling gun systems, cable-tow travelers and hose-pull travelers. <� a Age dk t7,- 0.4::„.,,RY. Ddu .. ^dap- E — ' —...''' ''': '','"itlr'''''''Atz.::;^.2:44,„A,,ZF `''''' a i - .. .',..,'.,:', 4,4%,.. .,,I.T1.,:%;!........1 s'.;,.`" 2...4".'', a . IFigure 7. Cable-tow Traveler irrigation I Cable-Tow Traveler Irrigation System: A cable-tow traveler consists of a large sprinkler mounted on a gun cart and a large flexible hose, one end of which is attached to the gun cart and the other end to a pipe supplying I water from the water source. The machine propels itself through the field by winding a steel cable around a drum or pulley mounted on the gun cart. Power to propel the cable winch may be supplied by a water motor, water piston, water turbine or an auxiliary engine. The I depth of water application is varied by varying the speed of the cable winch. Hose sizes are available in diameters from 21/2 to 6 inches. Typical lengths available range I from 330 to 1320 feet. The maximum length of run is twice the length of the hose assuming the hose is connected to the supply pipe in the center of the travel lane. The cable-tow hose is flat when not in use and is stored by winding on a hose reel. IThe cable used to propel the machine is a multi-strand, high strength aircraft type. It must be attached to an immovable object at the edge of the field. A tractor can be used for this Ipurpose or you can install a "deadman" at the end of each travel lane. The cable-tow traveler is a versatile machine and can be used on a variety of crops and field Isizes and slopes. For most crops, except low growing crops like peanuts, an alleyway is required for the machine. This alley or travel lane may be as little as 6 feet wide for smaller machines or as much as 16 feet for larger machines. The travel lane should be cleared of Irocks and other abrasive materials that could damage the hose. I EXHIBIT P Hose-Pull Traveler Irrigation System: The hose-pull traveler is composed of four main components: a large reel mounted on a two or four wheel cart; a gun cart; a large volume gun type sprinkler mounted on the gun cart and a large semirigid polyethylene hose. The trailer mounted hose reel is parked at the end or in the middle of a travel lane. Water is fed through the hose to the sprinkler cart. The sprinkler t cart is pulled along by the hose as the hose is wound onto the trailer mounted hose reel. The hose reel is driven by a turbine, water bellows, water piston or auxiliary engine. Hose sizes available range from 2 to 5 inches inside diameter. The length varies from 600 to 1250 feet. These units use a large reel to wind the hose and therefore have a high profile with some of the larger machines having an overall height of 12 feet. This height tends to make the unit top heavy. You should always take care when transporting the machines to prevent them from tipping over. Design and operation is similar to the cable-tow traveler mentioned earlier. The following comparisons can be made between the cable-tow traveler and the hose-pull traveler. 1. The hose-pull traveler can be moved in a shorter length of time because there is no hose to reel in and no cable to unwind. 2. The hose-pull traveler will require slightly more pressure to operate at the same gpm and hose length because the friction loss through the hose and drive mechanism is usually greater. 111 3. The hose-pull traveler is usually more expensive, but it may be capable of irrigating more acreage because less time is required to reposition it. 4. Only the amount of hose that is needed must be wound off the hose-pull traveler, whereas all the hose of the cable-tow machine must be wound off the reel and stretched out so water can flow through the hose. This makes the hose-pull machine easier to use on short runs. 5. The hose-pull traveler does not require a separate anchor, such as a tractor or earth anchor to which the cable is attached. 6. The hose on the hose-pull machine is pulled in a relatively straight line. On the cable- tow machine, the hose is pulled in a loop. In areas with obstructions, this could result in more hose damage on the cable-tow machine. 7. A travel lane is not required for the hose of the hose-pull machine. Except in low growing crops, a travel lane is required for the cable-tow machine. Both systems use a large sprinkler that requires a relatively high operating pressure - 80 psi at the gun. Since pressure is lost traveling through the hose, mainline and drive mechanism, the pump operating pressure is usually high-as high as 150 psi on a typical 550 gpm machine. This requires more horsepower and thus more energy consumption than a comparable center pivot system. Also, labor requirements for travelling gun systems are considerably higher than for a center pivot system. 1 2 /5cm . ) CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor&City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney,Public Works Director SUBJECT: Street Lighting on Sarazin Street for Shakopee Valley Market Place DATE: January 5, 2000 INTRODUCTION: This agenda item is to consider the street lighting proposal from Oppidan, with the Shakopee Valley Market Place on Sarazin Street. BACKGROUND: With the Shakopee Valley Market Place site development, street lighting was included in the site plan for the Target building permit. Included in this site plan was the proposal to use the same lighting fixtures in the building site area on Sarazin Street adjacent to the development. The street lights proposed are not the standard street lights that Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (SPUC) has in the approved Street Lighting Policy, nor can these lights be powered or maintained by SPUC. In the Street Lighting Policy, street lighting fixtures that are different than the standards included in the policy can be established only under a Special Lighting District, when approved by the City Council and SPUC. In this case the street lighting fixtures proposed will not be maintained by SPUC and thus a Special Lighting District is not an option. The proposal from Oppidan is to enter an agreement between the City and the development for the operation and maintenance costs associated with the street lights on Sarazin Street. The alternatives available with this item is to either allow the street lights to be installed, as proposed by Oppidan, with an agreement on the operation, maintenance and replacement costs of the street lighting system on Sarazin Street, or to require the developer to remove the lighting system and to install the lighting system as per the Street Lighting Policy. One item of note with the proposed system by Oppidan is that there are more street lights along Sarazin Street than the Street Lighting Policy would require. These additional street lights will light the street area more than the normal street lighting standards. However, the light intensity does meet the zoning code. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Make a motion allowing the street lighting system as proposed at a site plan for Shakopee Valley Market Place in the Sarazin Street right-of-way, and authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into an agreement for the street lighting on Sarazin Street, as approved by the City Attorney. 2. Do not allow the street lighting system as proposed and the site plan for the Shakopee Valley Market Place in Sarazin Street and direct the developer to install the street lighting standards, as per the Street Lighting Policy. 3. Table for additional information. RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes that the current street lighting system by the developer is a benefit for the amount of traffic that would be using the street system. Another benefit for the City is that the maintenance and operation of the street lights would not be a cost that would be responsible by the City or SPUC, thus there would be savings to the taxpayer or rate payer. Staff recommends Alternative No. 1, to allow the street lights to remain with an agreement between the City and developer for the operation, maintenance and replacement for street lighting along Sarazin Street. ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion allowing the street lighting system and authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into an agreement for the street lighting on Sarazin Street, as approved by the City Attorney. 401 Bruce Loney Public Works Director BL/pmp LIGHTS 12/28/99 15:09 FAX 6129331153 RLK-KUUSISTO W1003 I "'l Z s 8 ><i �i !!1111 rt;t:7, r4 . ii' L!llilltU „ 1 co VA•WwIl 414 aI it 1 0 I i :::er i • • • • 2141 •• a a 31 I Berqlpt Ii:I 1hh: 1': iij, 114' •1: P. 1!1 II 1 lii I:1: 11 frigy Ilia 1 gg fig_1�_i at IHseihL 1 es: Ai ilillii"at I!IsAli”3A 110111"ae !1Itt hI .... . . i �--, drank t. t �F • InntnlnfluI II : \ - ( ix ii. • i r: :::J : : i �� G i •^ I 61 ` tr •T el . I 1 II IIS fill II I ID ;` ` ```� �`�� 1� moi , ; 1,:,.0.,,,.:t.,,., 1t . ,, i,,7:,., , M . . i i 1III} I1IID 1 ::. . .•, • ulnuiuuuululu 8 :< 1 ITIIIIUhI UIIIITIIIIIIIIIU.\ :,:, - - -, -- : ;v:-:-..: •1 , ( I : i \ I :r �- .- . ; . 0 III IIII�1111111111111D \ r 1 ; `31s 1 J I .i s A 't 11 t I 1 L I 1 tL .r I. • ...., _.. .._. _!_ !�.__. ._..._......... I A VA ---- ------------------- _ v— __ –_.- ..___.. _-. Ll ..__..-_ ..._ _....,__ ---_ `\ // 12/28/99 15:08 FAX 6129331153 RUC-KUUSISTO a 002 �f P UiM S& :A _ 101)00CAD 51OCL 1.141! w CAO fY110DL OD'E : 0 0. _ L�10216= t71tf000 WN . 0 Omilweby eta tir1 000041 Tppa:319 vw •e13'w +S�j 9 3w SIMOOL 112E: S ,p 5 FEMME: OM.O a A FRC t 1200 ill I C 1EOmf1111E:ID a e C 400 t101 20 0.iMli 0rYnw••OF w g CAD STIMIOL :50213111 fi[/MYE:0. EC91NQ.02i • WI[r6 • . . .1'2i WO ■ 0 • -iwow=:12 (M R, s - ` 400 INN 111 R./MSS•.umei•a sr w $ y E Z'a ' CAD TAM. 010 SY If4:: 5111 `a RI umilLoi 5• ]2 •) . -,i.ti seri - e ... .. TARGET _ LWII••Or:W-1 __ _ sr 126.200 S.F. 762 .OD 011.4 r IT ems.Iee1Ne/i>T w w.r r ..,��.•..� CADS :SOIplIM .•.•...,r r w■r .I�.rl. - CC SYMOOL f0!: 4 Sc AM.•\•r _ 1011 . 0 f.1- C2 LLI11101E:C WOO A p .••--.a, , . = J 4009111 OPE II• l 0 2090 ..._ ...;i1 - .. B _ a0 5110110L :22023111,..;...- CO PIM.ME 4 ' ��i.m. r. 11 — 1yPIM I.r+ R1 • o 7 _ 0000 :Ct _ 11th . G. ---, 400151N OPE FL 00 rrawsla0 II 300 Mill • 2 A IMEN\EnD NECIN.atEt _— r U111045. 40000 OPPIDAN — ,E•, W 101 : 0 _ euuer et eolroCretx of aua • ts► 7. �- Z tiLLJ -II} NOTES: Ny r 6340.000.00 r IIA(11111111 F.A •MOW+7111 AVENUE WIN EN11WQ CMA/Jeo •12.442 031 0:NORM wN2r MONO 0.0•1 Op •ADDED 1IDNTS ALONG OMNI AVE .r 8/17/99 .. .. •RAN 511U.1201102 11Y0 914E ION I.Iat a.r•..r w.�we rer...w. ... . . .... . ...... ....•.. .. . . . .... .... SMOG ON NOON ODE Of MIST e...,••+.....••11/NY..•,..v ..... ......... ••••r.e.•.,1..r•••••1•1••m..•w ,..._ _ .... .. ... .".I _.u� •f140/LOCO=OF CDNDu1rf MO 501 •.•.•.w.•...•11.1.•1 run ow- OF y� OF CONWxt01610•E v1E►MED A •••••or76• ,rToo w.r•.r•.- • .... .. I.-.. ••••••••••..•>••�•- 1.`—. .. .'.•...' ..a ELECTRICAL COMMCr�e•n•�mo�at wee ,•.+...•.I••••..,.••...•,.r•..• •1•1•1•1 •1•1•1•1... •1•1•1•1 •1•1•1•1. ..I .. .. •I US INC.C GNAC. .II 1 r•.••...W 11•11•• RETAIL'S"....'.'........ ..RETAIL T... e.•y.,r Hall..WI.IOW M Al• - 2.9908E.-1..'..' ... . . •1..•1•1•1 Lwow 1 .. .. ` •a•LL FORMS ON MIXT P$.MC 70 • .. •1•1•1•1... •1•1•1•1. ... •1•1•1•1.. ... .. •11•1•1. .. ... .. •1•1•1•1 •1•1•1•1 .. •1•1•1•1.. ... . i.' SE A PART Of 114E ARCISICTUNAL ... ......... •1•1•1•1... •1•1'•1'•1'.�.' .. ELECTION./4102112. KA 2.0,7, :"� .. ;•1•1•1•1 •1•1•1•1.. ... ........... .. •1•1•1•1... •1•1•1•1... •Al tams 940014 ON MN(MOM I.\ �r1rT.-r—� :...-.PHASE TWO UGHIII D :.. _..., tenleN 114E SIL a ALONG OWN •A o T -a .. Aro 01•O!• , ... .. •1•1•1•1MEMO)1n=KT =I MOM IIIIIIMIIIMIIIIII A mar MAK>b r 1'oeR1ED ■Et . . .. .. ©fir---rte . .. . ... •1•1•1•1 ..._ Ir.r�.� �..-.,r`'T SHAKOPEE VALLEY •1•1•1__•1._._ •1•1_•1•1_. w___ _:rx--•1•1•1__•1---.._. MARKETPLACE SHAKOPEE.MINNESOTA •1•1•1 •1_. _.__.. _.__ ., _•1•1•1•1_:..�•1•1•1_•1. �_...._...,_:.,::...__ ._�.. .. 4FINAL Z E- UGH TING PLAN ILI I ie r rs + r lar RLK PRO,ECT #99185M8 . IS, C , L CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor& City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney,Public Works Director SUBJECT: Approve Traffic Control Signage Changes Along 5t Avenue and Lewis Street for I.D.S. 720 DATE: January 5, 2000 INTRODUCTION: This item is for Council consideration for traffic control signage changes on 5th Avenue and Lewis Street, as requested by I.D.S. 720 BACKGROUND: Attached is a letter from Bob Greeley from I.D.S. 720 requesting signage changes around the block owned by the school for Central Elementary. The signage changes affect the parking along Lewis Street and 5th Avenue, and per City Ordinance Section 7.03, requires that no revised signs or signals shall be created or maintained for traffic or parking control until Council has approved and directed the same. The proposed traffic parking sign changes are as follows: 1. Remove the handicap parking sign on Lewis Street and relocate the sign on 5th Avenue to just north of the 5th Avenue building access for the School District building. 2. Remove the no parking signs from 2:00 P.M. to 4:00 P.M. along 5th Avenue, as the bus loading area is not needed in this area. Staff has reviewed the signage changes request and feels that these requests are acceptable and can be accommodated without much cost as there are existing posts for sign placement and removal of signs can be done at a minimal cost. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Direct staff to make the traffic parking sign changes on Lewis Street and 5th Avenue, as per the School District request letter. 2. Direct staff not to make the traffic parking sign changes. 3. Table for additional information. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the fact that the School District building along Lewis Street and 5th Avenue is operating differently, the traffic parking sign changes are appropriate and staff feels should be done. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to direct staff to make the traffic parking sign changes on Lewis Street and 5th Avenue, as per the School District request letter. Bruce Loney Public Works Director BL/pmp SIGNS S I AKOPEE Shakopee School Board Superintendent: Robert J. Ostlund Kathy Busch, Chair Director of Community Education Anne Tuttle, Vice Chair Robert W.Greeley PUBLIC SCHOOLS Jessica Geis, Clerk Lori Gillick,Treasurer Community Education Todd Anderson, Director Mary Romansky, Director Steve Schneider, Director December 29, 1999 Mr. Bruce Loney Public Works Director City of Shakopee 129 S. Holmes St. Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Bruce: The Shakopee School District is requesting the following items at our Central Family Center/District Office facility located at 505 S. Holmes St.: 1. Removal of four white "No Parking School Hours 2-4 p.m." signs & posts located on Lewis St. and 5th Ave. and; 2. Move and relocate one blue "Handicap Parking-Vehicle ID Required" Sign from Lewis St. to near the 5th Ave. E. facility entrance. If permission is required, we are also asking to be allowed to designate one street parking spot and appropriate painting at the 5th Ave. E. location with this sign. All signs are located in the public right-of-way of Lewis St. and 5th Ave. E. next to this facility. OZ41,Z Robert W. Greeley, Director Community Education 505 South Holmes •Shakopee, MN 55379 (612)496-5025 • fax: (612)445-8446 ALL SCHOOLS ACCREDITED BY THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER isD , CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: Deputy Police Chief Performance Pay DATE: December 28, 1999 INTRODUCTION: The Council is asked to consider adding performance pay for the position of Deputy Police Chief. BACKGROUND: Several years ago, in an effort to encourage continued professional development,the Sergeants union and Police union had added to the language in each contract an option which provides for performance pay. In this, an officer attaining certain educational, physical conditioning, community service, and skills improvement criteria would be eligible for additional pay per month. This was provided as an alternative to the standard longevity pay, which rewards only for the duration of time that they are in the job. As stated,both the Sergeants and Police Officers union have this option. When Chief Dan Hughes was hired,this was also negotiated as a benefit for him. At the time that Jerry Poole was appointed as Deputy of Police Chief,he gave up his longevity and sick leave accrual bank. This then makes that position as the only sworn officer position for which performance pay does not exist as an option. In discussing this with Chief Dan Hughes, we feel that in the interest of equity within the Police positions, this should be granted. Attached is language which is consistent with the Union contracts, and is proposed for adoption for the Deputy Police Chief. BUDGET IMPACT: If all aspects of performance pay are attained by Mr. Poole, it could mean another$3600 annual impact on the Police budget. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the performance pay system as attached be adopted, for the Deputy Police Chief position. ACTION REQUIRED: If the Council concurs, it should,by motion,authorize the Performance Pay System as an alternative for use by the Deputy Police Chief position. fVuQ_ )L9 Mark McNeill City Administrator MM:tw • PERFORMANCE PAY SYSTEM Employees may earn additional compensation based on the following criteria: B.1 Education/Training ($110/month or$1,320 year) Two Components 1. Education($55/month)-employees with a Bachelor's or Master's degree in job related field would be eligible to receive this additional compensation. -immediate eligibility 2. On-going education/training($55/month-annual requirement) (a) Academic-2 courses(minimum 6 credits),or (b) training-24 P.O.S.T. credits Academic courses must be from an accredited institution of higher learning and be approved by the Chief of Police prior to enrolling. The City would reimburse employees for college courses consistent with the City's tuition • reimbursement policy. Training sessions must be approved by the Chief of Police prior to attending. The City would pay for the training sessions. The training requirements are above and beyond the normal P.O.S.T. licensing requirements. - The courses/training sessions must be attended on off-duty time. - Eligibility after 3 years of service. B.2. Performance ($55/month or$660/year) Employees who perform at an above average level will be eligible to receive merit pay. Merit pay will be based solely on the employee's annual performance evaluation. - The City will not place restrictions on the number of employees that will be eligible to receive merit pay. • 14 - Employees that have received merit pay may lose it if their performance does not continue at an above average level. • Since the merit pay is based on annual performance evaluations, it may be grieved to the Police Chief and City Administrator,but is not arbitrable. Eligibility after 2 years of service. B.3 Community Service ($55/month or$660/year) - Employees who are actively involved in some outside community service (scouting activities,service clubs,youth athletics,church groups,etc.) would be eligible to receive additional compensation. - Community service does not have to occur in the City of Shakopee. - Community service activities are an excellent means of personal growth and development,and should result in the employee having substantial input into the community. - Community service activities need to occur on an annual basis. - Community service activities must be pre-approved by the Chief of Police and employee must show evidence of participation in the group/activity. • - Eligibility after 4 years of service. B.4 Wellness/Fitness ($35/month or$420/year) - Employee would need to make substantial progress on personalized wellness/fitness goals and objectives to qualify for additional compensation. Employee would receive a personalized wellness/fitness profile with certain goals/objectives. Employee would be required to make substantial progress toward meeting the various goals/objectives or to maintain a sound wellness/fitness profile. - Employee would be evaluated for compliance every year. - Eligibility after 2 years of service. B.5 Skill Assessment ($45/month or$540/year) - Employee must pass an annual written assessment that would be developed by the staff and administered by the Chief of Police to qualify for additional compensation. • 15 The assessment will be based on information from the Department's Policy &Procedures Manual,criminal code, City ordinances,traffic laws, IACP training keys,and other relevant criteria as determined by Employer. • - The evaluation will be 50 questions and score of 75%or above is considered passing. - Eligibility after 1 year of service. • 110 16 lS CITY OF SBAEOPEE CONS e Memorandum r TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SUBJECT: Designation of Official Newspaper DATE: December 30, 1999 INTRODUCTION: City Council is asked to designate the official newspaper for 2000. BACKGROUND: The City is required by law to publish certain matters in its official newspaper, during the course of the year. We publish the Council minutes(motions primarily), Ordinances,Resolutions when required by law, notices of public hearings on planning matters and public improvement projects, and advertisements for bids. It is appropriate that this designation be made at this time. To be qualified as a medium of official and legal publication, a newspaper must meet certain qualifications set forth by State law. To name a few, it must be distributed at least five days each week if a daily paper or be distributed at least once each week for 50 weeks each year if not a daily paper. News columns devoted to news of local interest to the community which it purports to serve must be 25%if published more often than weeldy and 50%if weeldy. It must be circulated in the City which it serves and meet certain circulation requirements. It must have its known office of issue located within the county or adjoining county of the City it serves. It must file a statement of ownership and circulation with the secretary of state each year. As long as I can remember,the Shakopee Valley News has been the City's official newspaper. The City has received the attached letter from Mr. Rolfsnid asking that the City consider appointing the Shakopee Valley News as its official newspaper. The 2000 charge for legal notices will be $9.25 per column inch. Previous years charges for legal notices were: 1999-$8.78/column inch for 1'` insertion 1998-$8.37/column inch for 1'` insertion 1997-$8.05/column inch for 1'` insertion 1996-$7.67/column inch for 1'` insertion Designation of Official Newspaper December 30, 1999 Page-2- During the middle of 1997,the City began submitting legal notice copies on floppy disk which resulted in a cost savings because the Shakopee Valley News staff did not have to retype the notices for publication in the newspaper. In 1999 we began transmitting our legal notices by e-mail. The 2000 charge for legal notices submitted in this manner will be $7.86 per column inch, reflecting a 15%cost savings to the City. The City has budgeted$18,000 for 2000 for legal publications. The City has had a very good working relationship with the Shakopee Valley News. They have been very accommodating in publishing notices that were sent to them after their deadline and have published them whenever possible. They have published items at no charge in their"In Brief' section as well as press releases. They have also written articles on matters when requested to get the word out. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Designate the Shakopee Valley News as the City's official newspaper. 2. Obtain quotes from other newspapers that may qualify as an official newspaper. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1. Residents of the City are more likely to look for legal notices pertaining to their community in a local publication. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to designate the Shakopee Valley News as the official newspaper for the City of Shakopee for the year 2000. ;:dyuayvsvx Shakopee Valley News � V December 7, 1999O« 2 2 1999 Ms.Judy Cox, City Clerk CIQFMAKOP� City of Shakopee F 129 Holmes Street Shakopee,MN 55379 Dear Ms. Cox, Please consider our request for appointment of the Shakopee Valley News as the official newspa- per for the City of Shakopee in 2000. Legal notices published in the Shakopee Valley News during this time period will be billed at the rate of$9.25 per column inch for the first insertion and $6.90 per column inch per subsequent inser- tions. The city can again take advantage of a lower rate if it submits legal notice copy on floppy disk in ASCII text format. The same rate would apply if the document is e-mailed in text format. This system worked well in 1999 and allows for a substantial labor savings if the Shakopee Valley News staff does not have to retype the notices prior to them being published in the newspaper. If the materials are sent over on disk,we would request that a hard copy accompany the disk in the event we have any difficulties transferring data files. The rate for the materials submitted in this manner would be $7.86 per column inch, reflecting a 15%cost savings to the City of Shakopee. In accordance with Minnesota Statute 331 A.02,the Shakopee Valley News has met certain qualifi- cations in order to become a legal newspaper to better serve the community.Some of the qualifica- tions we must meet to become a legal newspaper include: distribution of the paper at least once a week for 50 weeks out of the year; be circulated in the local public corporation which it purports to serve,and either have at least 500 copies regularly delivered to paying subscribers,or have at least 500 copies regularly distributed without charge to local residents; have its known office of issue established either in the county in which is lies in whole or in part,the local public corporation which the newspaper purports to serve, or in an adjoining county; file a copy of each issue immediately with the state historical society; etc. These are just a few of the stringent guidelines a newspaper must fulfill in order to become a certified legal newspaper. It is our goal to serve you as your legal newspaper for the coming year. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you in the past.We hope that relationship can be con ' ued in the coming year. --spcif_ "Rolfsrud Publisher SHR:bb enclosure 327 Marschall Road • Suite 125 •Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 •(612) 445-3333 INFORMATION FOR GOVERNMENTAL BODIES AND INDIVIDUALS USING THE LEGAL NOTICES SECTION OF THE SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS Deadlines Notices to be published must be received in the office of the Shakopee Valley News by 4:00 p.m.,on the Friday, preceding each publication date.This deadline must be observed to ensure accurate and timely pub- lication of important notices.We will not accept faxed notices as legal documents,as these copies are often unreadable.All hard copy notices should be clean and typed. Affidavits One sworn affidavit of publication will be provided,upon request,without charge for each legal notice.Addi- tional affidavits are available at$3.50 each.Additional clippings are available for$1.00 each. Late Fee Urgent legal notices which do not arrive at the Shakopee Valley News office before the specified deadline may be accepted,at the publisher's discretion,but will have a late fee or surcharge of 25 percent added for special handling. Publication Requirements Most specifications for legal notice publication,including the number of times a notice is to run,are set forth by statute.Interpretation of the statutes is the responsibility of the customer and its legal counsel,not the publisher. Guidelines for governmental bodies,prepared by the Minnesota Newspaper Association,are available upon request. Kill Fee Publication of scheduled notices may be stopped,depending on how far the printing process has advanced.If a legal notice is killed before the initial publication date,the customer may still be liable for a special typesetting fee,not to exceed 30 percent of the cost of the published notice.The customer must pay on a pro data basis, for that part of a series of publications that have been completed before interruption by the customer. Errors Publisher assumes no responsibility for errors in typesetting or scheduling of legal notices.In all cases,publisher's liability shall be limited to a"make good"of a defective notice if it can be demonstrated that the error was made by the publisher and that as a result of the error the legal notice was rendered invalid. Rates Effective January 1, 1985,the Minnesota State Legislature authorized legal newspapers to charge for legal notices in the same manner in which they charge their best commercial display classified customers.That means that legal notices are billed by the column inch,not by the"legal line."The law also restricts rate increases exceeding 10 percent per annum. SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users $12.00 Legal advertising,first insertion $9.25 Legal advertising,subsequent insertions $6.90 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor& City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director Marilyn Remer,Payroll/Benefits Coordinator SUBJECT: Hiring of Assistant Finance Director DATE: January 4,2000 INTRODUCTION: Interviews have been held with candidates for the Assistant Finance Director position. At this time, staff is recommending that the City Council authorize the hiring of Jason Bullard to fill this position. BACKGROUND: A vacancy was created by the termination of Greg Sticha, Accountant III effective November 5, 1999. City Council authorized upgrading the position to an Assistant Finance Director. Staff utilized the Scott County Employee Relations for the selection process which provided a certification list of nine candidates. Staff interviewed five candidates from this list. The interview panel consisted of the City Administrator,Finance Director and Payroll/Benefits Coordinator. After reviewing the results of the interviews and applications,the recommendation is to hire Jason D. Bullard. Mr. Bullard has twelve years accounting experience in previous positions as an Accounting Supervisor and as an Accounts Payable Manager in the private industry. He has prepared financial statements,performed audits, set up budget models, and presented various financial analysis and reports. His anticipated starting date is January 31, 2000 and would be contingent upon successful completion of the standard pre-employment physical, background and credit checks and a professional assessment. BUDGET IMPACT: The advertised starting salary range was $43,970 - $48,681/year exempt from overtime status. Staff is recommending and Mr. Bullard has agreed to the starting salary of$45,540/year, Step 2, Grade J of the 2000 Pay Plan with subsequent increases in pay occurring on the annual anniversary date of employment. All new hires are subject to a 6-month probationary period. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the hiring of Jason D. Bullard for the Assistant Finance Director position. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to authorize the hiring of Jason D. Bullard as Assistant Finance Director at$45,540 annually, Step 2,Grade J of the 2000 Pay Plan, effective January 31, 2000; subject to successful pre-employment physical,background and credits checks, and professional assessment. /5,E. 3, CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: Acting Mayor- 2000 DATE: December 29, 1999 INTRODUCTION: The Council is asked to affirm the appointment of Clete Link as Acting Mayor for 2000. BACKGROUND: Traditionally at the first meeting of January, officers for the upcoming year are appointed by the City Council. Included in this are Council liaison appointments to various Boards and Commissions. Mayor Brekke asks that the liaison appointments be deferred until January 18th, so that he has an opportunity to discuss the appointments more fully. However,the position of Acting Mayor should be appointed as soon as possible, so as to have a designated elected head should Mayor Brekke be unavailable. The Mayor recommends that Clete Link serve as Acting Mayor for the upcoming year. ACTION REQUIRED: If the Council concurs, it should, by motion, affirm Clete Link as Acting Mayor for the City of Shakopee for the year 2000. • U lAk Mark McNeill City Administrator MM:tw 15, E. Li CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: Canterbury Card Club Hearing—January 3rd DATE: December 29, 1999 INTRODUCTION: The City Council hosts a hearing on the Card Club Monday, January 3r1, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers. BACKGROUND: As part of a desire to provide opportunities for Shakopee residents to learn more about the proposed Card Club operation at Canterbury Park,the City Council scheduled a hearing in the City Council Chambers on January 3rd. At that time, presentations will be made by Canterbury Park representatives, and meeting attendees will have an opportunity to ask questions. The meeting will be cablecast. Note that notice of this has been provided in the Shakopee Valley News, and over channel 34. While it is advertised as a hearing, it is not officially a"public hearing", which connotes different notification requirements. This is a special meeting, and, as such,the City Council can take action at that meeting— for example, a position endorsing or not endorsing, or adopting formal comments which might be considered by the Racing Commission when it holds its meetings on the Card Club on January 10th, or January 19t. In addition,there will be an agenda item on this subject on the January 4th City Council meeting, so that if there is a desire to take action at that time, rather than on Monday,the Council could defer action until then. ACTION REQUIRED: The Council should hear information regarding the Card Club operation,take any public input, and give direction as to what, if any, action it wishes to take on this subject. )ittri-11"- Mark McNeill City Administrator MM:tw CC: Dan Hughes, Police Chief UPCOMING MEETINGS ON CANTERBURY CARD CLUB SCHEDULED The Shakopee City Council will be meeting on Monday,January 3, 2000, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. The purpose of this meeting is to hear a presentation by Randy Sampson, President of Canterbury Park, on the operations of the proposed Card Club and to give the City Council and the public an opportunity to ask questions about it and its impact of Shakopee. The Card Club was approved by the 1999 Minnesota Legislature, which would permit up to 50 tables to be operated at Canterbury for the purpose of operating card games of chance. Part of the revenues from the operation of the card games will go to benefit the horse racing industry. The Club is expected to add 200 full time, and nearly 100 part- time jobs at Canterbury. The Shakopee Police Department and the Minnesota Department of Public Safety have been working with Canterbury to establish rules to ensure a safe and beneficial operation. Those rules will be considered by the Minnesota Racing Commission in a meeting scheduled to be held January 19th, at 1:00 p.m. at Canterbury Park. On Monday, January 10, 2000, at 7:00 p.m. the Racing Commission will be holding a statutorily-required public hearing on the proposed Card Club at City Hall. Interested parties are encouraged to attend the meeting on January 3rd and share their comments with the City Council in order that the Council may have this information prior to the Racing Commission hearing on the 10a`. The public is also invited to attend that meeting. For further information regarding these meetings, contact City Hall 445-3650. 15—i 12 CITY OF SHAKOPEE o 1 w G K, Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: Card Club Issues DATE: January 3, 2000 After discussions with the Police Chief,we feel there are five issues which the City Council may wish to address, depending upon the information presented at the card club meeting this evening (Monday). 1. Back Line Betting—Back Line Betting is the practice of allowing people to "look over the shoulder"of gamblers actually seated at the table, and placing bets on how those hands will fare. If two back line betters are allowed per seated gambler, it triples the number of gamblers at each table. Canterbury had requested two back line betting positions be authorized per seated gambler; at its December 29th meeting,the Racing Commission discussed reducing that to one back line better each. Staff's concern is that any back line betting increases the potential for conflict between back line bettors, and seated gamblers, especially when the seated gambler plays his/her hand in a manner contrary to what the back line bettor felt was appropriate. In addition,the security cameras will be trained on each table; the back line betting positions may not be able to be monitored. The amount of back line betting may have an impact on the numbers of security personnel that will need to be on staff at any one time. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City take a position of having no back line betting authorized. The Racing Commission has discussed this; a possible compromise would be that while there would be no back line betting initially, it could be something for which Canterbury could make application in the future, after operations are established. 2. Betting Limits—Certain types of games are being proposed to have"spot" betting allowed. In this type of gambling, each card hand would be allowed to have separate bets placed on the table, in addition to what the better might have to his hand. The Legislature allowed$15.00 as the maximum opening wager by any player in any card game. In addition, State law says"no single si Id wager that increases the total amount staked in any card game may exceed $30.00." Canterbury had requested 20 spots per hand;the Racing Commission reduced that to 10 spots. The net effect of implementing the Racing Commission's authorizing is that each hand could have up to $315.00 bet upon it. Staff recommendation: We recommend no position on this,but to remind the Racing Commission that spot betting may invite this issue to be revisited by the Legislature to impose more restrictive limits. 3. Hours of Operation—Canterbury has requested 24 hour operation. This is consistent with the hours at neighboring Mystic Lake. Staff is aware that some casinos in California are allowing hours of operation only from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. It is the thought that the four hour closing time will force gamblers to go home; this may reduce the potential for addiction for those with compulsive behavior. If a 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. closing time is not enacted immediately,the Council should ask that this issue be allowed to be revisited annually,to determine if there is merit in imposing such closing restrictions in the future. See attached article. Staff recommendation: We recommend that the Racing Commission authorize the hours of operation issue to be examined annually during March,with a decision made by March 30t, beginning in 2001. 4. Age Limits—Currently, State law authorizes gambling at age 18. This is in conflict with the minimum age of 21 for alcohol consumption. Canterbury has stated that they will be allowing drinking on the premises,with some sort of identifying mark(wrist band, etc), to differentiate between those who are of age, and those who are under 21. Staff is concerned about this, but realizes that it will take an act of the Legislature to have the age of authorization for gambling increased from 18 to 21 years of age. Staff recommendation: Canterbury should be aware that the City will continue to do alcohol compliance checks, and that, if there are violations,there will be the potential for penalties, including administrative fines, license suspensions, and/or revocations. ,0011 5. City Expense Reimbursement—While the State Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division is responsible for monitoring the games,there will be other expenses that the City will incur as a result of the card club operation, either during its start up phase, or as it is ongoing. Staff recommendation: Staff recommends that an agreement be entered into prior to the opening of the card club, in which Canterbury agrees to reimburse the City in full for any card club-related start up or ongoing expenses incurred by the City. Such an agreement is currently being drafted by the attorney for Canterbury Park. If the Council chooses to take action on any of these recommendations, they can either do so tonight, or can direct that further information be provided, and that action could be taken at the January 4th City Council meeting. The Racing Commission will hold its public hearing on January 10th in the City Council Chambers at 7:00 p.m. The Commission is expected to consider the rules at a Racing Commission meeting to be held at 1:00 p.m. January 19`I'. Mark McNeill City Administrator I:jeanette/cardclubissues Sgnt- City of Shakopee; 612 445 2313; Dec-30-99 4:58PM; Page 2/2 1 J Vol.5• No. l2 5 i . , _. ACROSS THE STATES 1 a way to prevent new players from amount of risk." CALIFORNIA becoming addicted."There is no cure A hard-core gambler who has been for those already addicted to gam- coming to the casino says the restric- Cardroom Limits Ming," Loan Thuy Nguyen told the dons won't stop his desire to play but Designed to Stop Adds newspaper. Nguyen's anti-gambling he tells others not to start. "Don't At 4:00 a.m.there are 300 mea and efforts in 1995 included the first pro- become a gambler,"he warns a first- women filling San Jose's Bay 101 card posals to limit operating hours of time visitor. "I am addicted, I lost club. Their sole reason for l eing cardrooms. "But I think (cardroom $230,000 over two years."This gam- awake at this ungodly hour s to hour limits) can save those not yet bier worked for Intel as a technician gamble. But the San Jose City C)un- addicted. For instance, those who and graduated from UC Davis as an cii hopes to transform gambling rdm usually go to casinos after the night- engineer in 1996. Now hes unm- an obsession like this into a more clubs close at 2 a.m. will now have ployed and lives with a friend. recreational activity, and recently to go home," Nguyen said. placed limits on card games foi the The owners of the card clubs say CONNECTICUT first time in decades. The council the restrictions will hurt their busi- man Kinn In Casino voted to shut San Jose's two ra-d ness. But by delaying the impact of Parking Lot clubs for four hours each morning the betting limits until mid-2001,the and impose betting limits beginning city essentially gave the clubs 21 State police say an interview with in 2001. months to prove the measures will a man stabbed during a fight out- While some gamblers thought the unfairly cut into their profits, the side the Mohegan Sun Casino, may limit might help them cut the r News said. shed light on what sparked the al- losses,others vowed the game weld "Don't become a gambler," one tercation which left another man go on. "It's a joke. Gamblers will not • player told the News. "It's not really dead, the first apparent homicide at quit, they'll find a place.They're just worth it.I've lost a lot of money."An the American Indian Casino in Con- like smokers,"a Bay 101 patron told unemployed construction worker necticut, Gambling Magazine re- the San Jose Mercury News.All of :he who plays nightly at Bay 101, this ported. gamblers interviewed by the newts- player earns chips by giving advice Steven Baron of Killingly was shot paper asked not to be named. "The to newer players. He's what the gam- and killed in a casino parking lot. restrictions will onlystop chisbt,si in world calls a coach."I don't even Medics s from the casino found Baron spend my own money. I never come inside a black 1994 Saab after state ness, not the gambling. Give int a break,"the patron said. i here with money" police received a report of a fight in Bay 101 and it's competitor G tri Another coach-level player who the parking lot. Aldore Malboeuf of den City have been dogged by coin has been coming to Bay 101 every Sterling was admitted to a Norwich plaints of crime, harm to gambli.ll, day for two years said that "cutting hospital for stab wounds. addicts and deterioration of families, hours will bring back the happiness Lt. Lawrence Gibeault of the East- particularly among the city's Viet- to many Vietnamese families." The em District Major Crime Squad told namese-American community, .reason, he said, is that Vietnamese Gambling Magazine that it was un- which makes up a large part of Eke gamblers in particular play for much clear whether the two men had al- clubs'clientele, the News said. larger stakes. "They usually wager ready been inside the casino.A state The council's action was applaud(d several thousand dollars, so any police spokesman said investigators by Vietnamese-American activists es amount of time cut would lessen the were waiting to interview Malboeuf. • • He said it was also unclear whether Casino Crime Digest' December 1999 1 ' PNILAI \--)v_AN \ SI-IAKOPEE Vics0P3 January 4, 2000 Ms. Cynthia Piper Chair, Minnesota Racing Commission P.O. Box 630 Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Commissioner Piper and Members of the Commission: Thank you for the opportunity to present the City of Shakopee's issues regarding the establishment of the Card Club at Canterbury Park. Those of you who were in attendance at the City-sponsored meeting on January 3`d heard a good discussion on the establishment of the Card Club. We agree that it will be of benefit to the Minnesota Horse Racing Industry, and will also provide Canterbury Park with a good revenue stream. City staff, specifically the Police Department, has been pleased with the cooperative attitude shown by you as the Racing Commission, and Randy Sampson and his associates, in working to provide a safe and attractive facility here in Shakopee. The City of Shakopee does have five issues for which it would like to go on record as being of concern: 1. Back Line Betting—Because of the potential for conflicts between patrons, and a reduced ability to adequately monitor,the City's first preference would be for there to be no back line betting. However,the compromise proposed by Mr. Sampson,which would allow two tables to function with back line betting on a trail basis, is acceptable to the City provided there is additional camera security for those beators. 2. Betting Limits—This relates to those games where "spot betting" is a part of the game. While the City has no specific concern on this relating to policing, we do question whether it was the intent of the Legislature to allow this type of betting, where $15 was specified as the maximum opening wager by any player in any card game, and that no single wager that increases the total amount staked in any card game may exceed$30. COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 129 Holmes Street South• Shakopee,Minnesota• 55379-1351 612-445-3650 FAX 612-445-6718 The City's concern is that this may invite the betting limits issue to be revisited by the Legislature. 3. Hours of Operation—Canterbury has proposed a 24-hour/7 day per week operation, depending upon market demands. Information that has been provided to the City indicates that some California cities are imposing a mandatory Card Club closing from 2:00 AM to 6:00 AM,which then would require those problem gamblers to go home, or at least go to another location. It may also be possible, that, depending upon traffic, a"round the clock"operation may pose a problem to nearby residential areas. While the City will not push for these closing restrictions at this time, it would like the opportunity for the hours of operation to be examined on an annual basis. We propose that the rules contain a provision that the hours of operation issue be examined annually during March,with the decision to be made by March 30th, beginning in 2001. 4. Age Limits—There is an inherent conflict between the age at which gambling is permitted by State law(18), and the age at which alcohol like beverages may be consumed(21). It is the City's responsibility to enforce alcohol laws within the City. Oh while our preference would be for the State to change the law to allow for gambling not to begin until age 21, it lieu of that, Canterbury should be aware that the City will continue to perform alcohol compliance checks. If there are violations,there will be the potential for penalties, including administrative fines, liquor license suspensions and/or revocations. 5. City Expense Reimbursement—There have been expenses incurred by the City relating to start up costs, and there will continue costs for services above and beyond those normally provided by the City, especially in the provision of public safety services such as Police. The City asks that an agreement be entered into prior to the opening of the Card Club, in which Canterbury agrees to reimburse the City in full for any Card Club- related start up, or ongoing expenses, incurred by the City. Again,the City appreciates the spirit of cooperation that has been demonstrated by the Racing Commission and Canterbury Park in seeking to establish rules that will be acceptable to all parties concerned. Canterbury has been, and will continue to be, a major player in the City of Shakopee. We want it to do well, and that it will provide for a positive recreational alternative for residents and visitors. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Jon P. Brekke Mayor JB:tw CITY OF SHAKOPEE I l Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Canterbury Park Proposed 2000 Schedule of Events MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 INTRODUCTION: As a part of its PUD approval, Canterbury Park is required to provide the City with its proposed schedule of events. Attached for the Council's information is the proposed 2000 event schedule provided by Mary Pat Monson, Special Events Manager for Canterbury Park. ACTION REQUESTED: Receive the proposed 2000 schedule of events for Canterbury Park. •JHIY. J.cYJVJYJ ic•. rl'I l.H1YILKDUKT rHfGm r.c 75-7 11 ,N1 City of Shakopee Attn: Mark McNeil 129 S Holmes Street Shakopee, MN 55379 • January 3, 2000 Dear Mark, In accordance with our PUD, Canterbury Park must file a letter with the City of Shakopee every January regarding our special events for the upcoming year. The following list is the schedule at this time. January 7-9 Sno Jam 2000:Fri./Media Day, 11am-2pm, Open to Public, Sat. & Sun. 9am - 4pm • 13-17 NBA Jam Van: Thur. 3pm-8pm,Fri.4pm-9pm, Sat. 2pm-8pm, Sun. 12pm-7pm,Mon. 6pm-l Opm • 15-16 WSA SnoCross World Wide Championship: Sat. Racing loam- 8pm • Sun. loam- 5pm 21-23 The Super Computer Show: Fri. l Dam-8pm, Sat. l0am-7pm, Sun. 10am-4pm • • February 4 - 6 The.Minnesota Walleye Expo:Fri, 3pm-9pm, Sat, 10am-8pm, Sun. 10am-5pm 14-15 Arctic Cat Dealer Show&Public Preview of 2001 Snowmobiles Hours: TBD 19-21 PRIVATE DEALER SHOW-Bill Hicks,LTD 24-27 All Canada Show: Thurs. 5pm-9pm, Fri. 3pm-9pm, Sat. 10am-8pm, Sun. 10am-4pm March CANTERBURY PARK HOLDING CORPORATION • 1100 Coma:Dow RoeD P.O.Box 508 Si•IAKOPF.E,MINNESOTA 55379 Frx 612'496.6400 •:tLEPHoNE 612.445.7223 .Jru i. ...c_u(Ju 16.'JJI II �I Illi LI\ Ji JI♦ I iii'IS v.wa i . April 16 HAM Fest-Ham Radio Operators Show& Sale: Sun. 7am-2pm 17 Shakopee Showcase: Mon. 4pm-9pm May 6 123rd Kentucky Derby"Simulcast Party": Sat. 9am-lam May 20- September 4 Live Racing Thursdays, Fridays - 1st Post 6:30 p.m. Saturdays, Sundays&Holidays- 1st Post 1:30 p.m. Thursdays -"Corporate Night"-Ubetcha Bar&Grill Fridays -"Live Bands"-Ubetcha Bar& Grill Sundays -"Family Day" & "Senior Day" September 8-10 Chancellor Media Concerts: Fri. 3pm-lOpm, Sat. 10am-lOpm, Sun. l0am-9pm October 1 -31 Spooky World Wednesdays - Sundays: - y y bpm lOpm November 6 Breedersu - C p. Sat. gam lam The above events are similar in nature to the ones we have conducted in the past. If you need any additional information or if we need to make any presentation to the City Council,please advise as soon as possible. If any additional special events are booked we will provide an updated schedule. Sincerely, Mary Pat Monson Special Events Manager 612-496-6448 -2000 09: 17 FROM SHRKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES TO 4456718 P.01 _ r9 67-f--- /5-, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 44411,4>. MetroWaters- 1200Warner Road, St-Paul,h+iN 55106793 A641. Telephone: (651)772-7910 Fax: (651)772-7977 °• F4a1'J Ai December 10,1998 F.=Note 1/10 13 a',a 11 5io4.c.c. T•I/1ARiC Mc Nem c. fCtNovt- 1yS-&718 Aixet tom,, Mr.Louis Van Hout,Utilities Manager g4-14.4-s" Shakopee Public Utilities Commission Phones ,/y/� 1030 East Fourth Avenue C;"X 111LP.e Shakopee,Minnesota 55379 !sr c c(- • RE: SHAKOPEE ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY ANALYSIS . Dear Mr.Van Hout: DNR staff have reviewed the City of Shakopee Public Utilities Commission Alternative Water Supply .._.A,nalysis_wleich.accon>pmied.V.W._Septesnber-9, 19991e#ter to me. This plan was prepared by Your consultant;:Schoen&Madson,Inc.,in an effort to re ceive,Dl�R approval of appropriating'vaterfroniWell • ---#I0fromtheMt-Simon.Iffinckley squiferforblendmgwitk Wel1s6amd7 whicbrexperiencetniraxt .... 1evelineaiciiig.tlreiafe4rmldnTwatex nnaxcirnnum.•UnderlemnccotaStatutes.103G.27I,an applicant must .demonstrate that there are no feasible or practical alternatives before the DNR can consider authorizing :::::=.._-"ne roraddliticiml appropriation-from r.tbe Mt:.Si moa,friacidegtqui - authorized, . .. may only be for potable use. • . . .... • -. .. : _...: .• . . . . .: - • : .•..:_...::::._ What Mom is-a,summary of commas--I:racivedomxbe:plan-from several.agen y.stafE_---...::,-.,..-7.-,...-,...:,._..-•• . .• • .. . The nitrate data supplied by your consultant for Wells 6 and 7 has been reviewed, and that is agreement that,based upon trend,nitrate levels could continue to rise in these wells and to exceed the drinking water r standard of 10 mg/L We believe it is important to continue efforts to identify the source ofd and develop and. implement a wellhead protection program. Identifying the source and extent of nitrate contamination may allow for estimating the future trend in nitrate concentrations in your network ofwells. • We understand the immediate need is for blending water,not additional capacity. If Well#10 becomes a .. • ,---.14,4t.Simon-Irinckieywell;how wvuld-it bes utilizd#Ieablendingssnet-eeo t Would the Sbs!ioope e • .:....:.Public Utilities Commission(SPUC) consider ta3dng.alexisting Mt. Simon-Hinckley well(#2 or 3)out of service to offset a new Mt. Simon Hindley Well#10? We are interested in the demand reduction measures SPUC has implemented to date.Is there more than the odd.evuisp inkfmg restriction,which tends.to redia the peak,but not overall demand?Hasyourrate st:uctu e-been'modified tot te-tlee de block rate? If so,is it applied to both residential and non-residential users? Additional demand reduction efforts coupled with information/educationprograms could reduce the daily per capita use, and lessen the reliance on Wells#6 and 7 during the peak summer months when these wells are most heavily utilized. - • DNR Information:651-296-6157 -•'•t-888-646-6367 • flY:651-296-5484- • 1-800-657-3929 An Equal Opportunity Employer !_ Pifnfed on Recycled Paper Containing a Who values Diversity W Minimum of 10%Poe-Canecmwr Waste JAN-04-2000 09:17 FROM SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES TO 4456718 P.02 If _ • . . Lows Van Haut = December 10, 1999 PAZ We are not yet convinced the Minnesota River should be eliminated from consideration as a component in long-tam municipal water supply in the Metro area. While it is acknowledged there are additional treatment and seasonal availability issues,the river could well complement existing groundwater supply wells. There are also potential went issues associated with Jordan(nitrate), FIG(iron), and Mt. Simon-Hinckley(radium)aquifers. Development ofa cooperative regional surfacewatertreatment fealty warrants further discussion. Low Sows in the Minnesota River would likely have little to no impact to the floodplain lakes and wetlands in the Minnesota River Valley. The report indicates additional Jordan wells could be located in the"Second Efigli Elevation District" where thick overburden has minimized nitrate contamination. Has adequate consideration been given to siting additional wells there, or in the"First High Elevation District" above Dean Lake,for blending and future capacity needs? Would the capacity of existing Well#10 (completed in the FIG), coupled with additional demand reduction measures,meet immediate blending'needs until such a well is&actions!? �._. _reportindicates a Mt. Simon-Eine-14y well lapproxotnately-1500 gpm) would allow blending for nitrate levels in Well#6 and 7 of 14mg/l. How would SPDC respond if nitrate continued to rise above -Wliat u`raMt. Simon Hlncldey well only yielded 500-900 gpm, similar to existing Weils#2 and ___. ......3?The analysis does not indicate whether Well#10 would be used continuously or only when nitrates in Well 116 or reaicaeeded a certain nitrate concentration. The report addresses interconnections with neighboring Cres. Because of water supply issues in Prior Lake and Savage, it concludes interconnects with those communities is not feasible at this time. There may be opportunity, particularly with siting of wells south of the Minnesota River bh4 to uttbze additional Prairie du Chien-Jordan water. This is still being explored through ongoing groundwater' modeling efforts. Water supply issues with other communities in the area lends further support for consideration of a regional water system where strategic siting and coordinated pumping may benefit both .. the member communities and provide protection to the significant surface water features oftbeMmnesota River Valley. Industrial water use is significant in Shakopee. The vast majority is used for purposes not requiring potable . . quality water.The report suggests a delivery system for such users would be prohibitive at this time,but should be re-evaluated if the water demand increases, and it becomes harder to find low-nitrate Jordan water. Have cost estimates been prepared to eliminate this from consideration at this time? RahrMalting is identified as one such high volume user whose process water may be available for secondary beneficial .. use. Rehr has contacted me in the past expressing interest in discussing ways to utilize their spent process water. This may warrant further discussion. 14- WWW 16:1 F! I-NUM SHHKUI-tt t'UtJL 1 U 1 1 L 1 1 1 t5 IU 44'b('1C I-.IO S Louis Van Hout December 10, 1999 Page 3 Thank you for commissioning the preparation of theAvle Water Simply Analysis. I suggest we schedule a meeting at your earliest convenience to discus the results ofthe pump test ofWedl#10 and the items identified above, and the immediate needs of SPUC. We must be convinced the requirements of Minnesota Statutes103G 271,subd.4a.,are met,as it pertains to feasible and practical alternatives,before authorizing appropriation of water from the Mt. Simon.A'inckley aquifer. Please call me at 651-772-7917 to coordinate a meeting place and time. Sincerely, • gi)14--;47-1(1L.4,14)CKI-- . . •Patrick J.Lynch • _ Area Hydrologist a .. soba-I.i>ac Stirs DNR Waters .._ . . _� .._w.---- _. _:.. -.. Dale Aca> ; Oaal Hydrologist _. ._.. Tun Jspa,DNR Wares - . _.... Laura Reeves,DNR Waren �... . .- -- . ... Gary°beds,Metroxilitaa Come "=Jobn-Baxter,Scboell&Madam,Inc. • • • • • TOTAL P.03