The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12/21/1999 TENTATIVE AGENDA CITY OF SHAKOPEE ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 21, 1999 LOCATION: 129 Holmes Street South Mayor Jon Brekke presiding 1] Roll Call at 7:00 p.m. 2] Pledge of Allegiance 3] Approval of Agenda 4] Mayor's Report 5] Approval of Consent Business - (All items noted by an * are anticipated to be routine. After a discussion by the Mayor, there will be an opportunity for members of the City Council to remove items from the consent agenda for individual discussion. Those items removed will be considered in their normal sequence on the agenda. Those items remaining on the consent agenda will otherwise not be individually discussed and will be enacted in one motion.) 6] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS - (Limited to five minutes per person/subject. Longer presentations must be scheduled through the City Clerk. As this meeting is cablecast, speakers must approach the microphone at the podium for the benefit of viewers and other attendees.) *7] Approval of Minutes of August 10, August 17, and December 6, 1999 *8] Approve Bills in the Amount of$923,927.67 9] Public Hearings: A] Proposed vacation of easements within Westridge Lake Estates and Westridge Lake Estates 2°a Addition—Res. No. 5295 B] Proposed vacation of a portion of Lewis Street north of Mound Street—Res. No. 5296 C] 2000 tax levy and budget—Res. No. 5290 and Res. No. 5291 10] Communications: 11] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 12] Recess for an Economic Development Authority meeting 13] Re-convene TENTATIVE AGENDA December 21, 1999 Page -2- 14] Recommendations from Boards and Commissions: 15] General Business A] Police and Fire *1. Use of City Resources in the Event of an Emergency or Disaster—Ord. No. 564 *2. Replacement Fire Fighting Turn Out Gear *3. Purchase of Civil Defense Sirens 4. Police Department Staffing Presentation B] Parks and Recreation 1. Acquisition of Park Land East of Sun Path School *2. Facilities Manager Resignation C] Community Development 1. Amcon Construction (Precision Collision) Appeal of Denial of CUP—tabled 12/7 2. Continental 95 Fund Appeal of BOAA's Denial of a Sign Variance for Kmart Store *3. Execution of Covenant of Dedication and Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetlands in Southbridge *4. 2000 Electrical Inspector Contract 5. Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for Proposed Valley Green Corporate Cntr. D] Public Works and Engineering *1. Accepting Work on Southbridge Parkway, 1997-4—Res. No. 5292 *2. Accepting Work on Southbridge Landscaping, 1997-4A—Res. No. 5294 *3. Accepting Bid for Asphalt Patching Box 4. Design Criteria for Subdivision Regulations—Res. No. 5279 —tabled 12/7 5. Adams Street No Parking Restrictions E] General Administration: *1. Closing TIF District No. 9 (FMG)—Res. No. 5298 2. MnDOT Parcels 43 and 39 (adjacent to CR-69) Request for Proposals *3. Deferment of Special Assessments for Madge Tobias *4. Completion of Probationary Period—Lynette Walsh *5. 2000 Fee Resolution—Res. No. 5293 *6. Fire Relief Contribution—Res. No. 5299 *7. 2000 Workers Compensation Insurance *8. Bids for Full Size Squad Car *9. Fixed Asset Capitalization Level 16] Other Business 17] Adjourn TENTATIVE AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting December 21, 1999 1. Roll Call at 7:00 p.m. 2. Approval of the Agenda 3. Approval of Consent Business-(All items noted by an 4 are anticipated to be routine. After a discussion by the President,there will be an opportunity for members of the EDA to remove items from the consent agenda for individual discussion. Those items removed will be considered in their normal sequence on the agenda. Those items remaining on the consent agenda will otherwise not be individually discussed and will be enacted in one motion.) A.) 4 Approval of Minutes: Lk)O 4. Financial A.) 4 Approval of Bills B.) 4 Chaska Interceptor Payment 5. 4 Resolution No. 99-5, Resolution Decertifying Tax Increment Financing District No. 9 (FMG) 6. Other Business: 7. Adjourn cdagenda.doc CITY OF SHAKOPEE _., , Memorandum - J TO: President & Commissioners Mark H. McNeill, Executive Director FROM: Gregg Voxiand, Finance Director SUBJ: EDA Bill List DATE: December 16, 1999 Introduction Attached is a listing of bills for the EDA for the period 12/03/99 to 12/16/99 . Action Requested Move to approve bills in the amount of $148 . 76 for the EDA General Fund and $0 . 00 for Seagate (code 9450) . E-1 1 0000 0 0 0 O 11 H I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O II A 1 . . . . 117 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 11 V 11 CO CO O 0 1/40 t0 t0 t0 II 11 d1 d1 O O N N N N II E1 11 • • • • H II 000N CO CD CO CO II In II W II NN01rI rri r-I rr4 r-I II A it II W CE11 11 ✓ co rCcII lHH OO 01 01 rn o1 W . . en Co E In we E-ia rt) ZZQ 1 N 0 1 A A H I EI E4 rn r13 \\O x aaaa I w ON I zz > H Tr a O I x ° N a r•-+ w a s E1 w FC � Y1U7 U H 0 wz HV I H H z H cn 10 G7 I 4 4 ril El 1 ZZXA V g 1 OA 1 Z I 1 t0 t0 r-I MCr) tor-I I N N r 1 1.11 II II II 0 0 0 al C+L II NNCOM ✓ 11 CO CO CO 01 I 41 II Ce/ r/ MM 1 M O II \0 t0 t0 t0 ✓ Z 11 0 0 0 0 II II II CT ON ON C' II 01 01 01 O1 II rnONrnCl II ri r-1 r-I r-I II \\\\ II Q1 01 d1 d1 W II OO r-I r-I E+ it QII CNIC•10.1C4 II r1 r-1 H ri II * 11 II * II * II 1-4 in II 01 al r-I * II 1•1 rl r1 * II 0 i1 II ZO * ii I"] 11 N N O rI H o wVHii rww0 x 0 oII r1 ri r-I H a A 0 H CU 11 ii I-1 0 0 o O O p. W El A II r,-1 r�-I Hi rON �-1 r.1 1.1 E°'1 II "'1 a4� * * 2 11 r1 1-1 ri ri 0 0 * * W 11 H H ,-4 r I E-4 E-4 * * L\ 3 , CITY OF SHAKOPEE p v'VI lj Memorandum TO: EDA Board of Commissioners Mark McNeill, Executive Director FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director SUBJ: Chaska Interceptor Payment DATE: December 16, 1999 Introduction and Background There are sufficient funds in the TIF pool to make a principal payment on the Chaska Interceptor debt . TIF was cited in the contract and in the TIF Plan as a source of funding for the project . Action Move to authorize the use of $500, 000 of TIF money to make a principal payment on the Chaska Interceptor debt . 9ev Gregg Voxland Finance Director I:\finance\docs\taxinc\chintpmt \Z1 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: EDA Commissioners Mark McNeill, Executive director FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director SUBJ: Closing TIF District No. 9 (FMG) DATE: December 16, 1999 Introduction & Background Tax Increment Financing District No. 9, FMG has reached the end of its allowable life. Resolution No. 99-5 documents official decertification of the district . Action Offer Resolution No. 99-5, Resolution Decertifying Tax Increment Financing District No. 9, and move its adoption. )71 Gregg Voxland Finance Director I:\finance\docs\taxinc\close#9 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE RESOLUTION NO. 9I RESOLUTION DECERTIFYING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 9 BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of Commissioners ("Board") of the Economic Development Authority for the City of Shakopee("Authority")as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The City of Shakopee ("City") has previously established its Minnesota River Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project")pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 469.001 to 469.047("HRA Act");and 1.02. Within the Project the City has created Tax Increment Financing District No. 9 (the "TIF District")pursuant to Sections 469.174 to 469.179(collectively,the "TIF Act"). 1.03. The Project and the TIF District are now administered by the Authority. ("Authority"). 1.04. The Authority and City have determined that is in the best interest of the City to decertify the TIF District as of December 31, 1999. Section 2. TIF District Decertified;Filing. 2.01. The TIF District is hereby deemed decertified as of December 31, 1999. 2.02. Staff is authorized and directed to transmit a copy of this resolution to Scott County with instructions to de-certify the TIF District,it being the intent of the City that no collection of tax increment from the TIF District will be distributed to the Authority after December 31, 1999. Approved by the Board of Commissioners of the Economic Development Authority for the City of Shakopee this 21st day of December, 1999. President Attest: Secretary SJB-154371 SH235-1 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ. REG. SESSION 8HAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AUGUST 10, 1999 Mayor Brekke called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. with Councilmembers Deb Amundson, Cletus Link, Bob Sweeney and Jane DuBois (at 4:53 p.m.) present. Also present were Gregg Voxland, Finance Director, R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director, Bruce Loney, Public Works Director, Mark McQuillan, Parks and Recreation Director, Greg Sticha, Accountant and Judith Cox, City Clerk. Also present were Larry Meilleur, Planning Commission, Jeff Kaley, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, Dave Thompson, Shakopee Public Utilities, Chief Dan Hughes, Shakopee Police Department and Chief Mary Athmann, Shakopee Fire Department. Mayor Brekke noted that based on Bob Sweeney's suggestion, one member from each of the Planning Commission, Park & Recreation Advisory Board and Shakopee Public Utilities was invited to discuss the 2000 Budget. Sweeney/Link moved to approve the agenda. Motion carried unanimously. Gregg Voxland gave an overview of the year 2000 budget. Mr. Voxland stated that it was possible that the City could be looking at a 15% increase in the general levy. Mr. Voxland noted that the debt service levy was increasing by 3.3%, the Shakopee Public Utilities contribution would be decreasing by 3.6% and more employees would be needed. Mr. Voxland also noted that revenues would increase. He further noted that a tax capacity rate hearing would need to be held in October, which is a new requirement. Bob Sweeney noted that a tax capacity rate increase hits the hardest in the lowest value housing. The Five-Year Equipment List was reviewed. Chief Dan Hughes, Shakopee Police Department, approached the podium. Chief Hughes stated that four cars are requested, two being replacements, one patrol car and one K-9 unit. Chief Hughes stated that as more officers are hired, there will not be enough vehicles. He also stated that one K-9 unit would last seven to eight years. Chief Hughes stated that the City needed to look at a K-9 unit due to the growth and City's needs. Mayor Brekke questioned whether one of the cars being requested to be replaced could be used as a backup. Chief Hughes stated that the replacement cars are about four years old and have nearly 100,000 miles but are useable. Bob Sweeney noted that the Vehicle Evaluation Forms show that Units 962 and 960 are in pretty good shape. Mr. Sweeney suggested doubling up on officers in the vehicles. Regarding a K-9 unit, Mr. Sweeney stated that usually a K-9 unit begins at the county level and if the county did not feel it was necessary, the City would probably not need a K-9 unit Official Proceedings of the August 10, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 2 either. Cletus Link questioned whether one of the requested replacement vehicles could be outfitted to be a K-9 unit. Chief Hughes stated it would be possible if the vehicle was certifiable. Deb Amundson questioned the cost of the animal. Chief Hughes stated that the Crime Fund would pay for the animal and its training at a cost of about $2,000. Mayor Brekke stated he supported a K-9 unit from a safety standpoint as well as a public relations perspective. He further stated that he felt Unit 960 should remain in service. Mr. Sweeney stated that he read that K-9 officers receive overtime pay for housing animals in their home. Chief Hughes acknowledged that officers did need to be compensated for that role, however, there was a variety of ways to compensate. Chief Hughes stated that most cities elect not to compensate via overtime. Mr. Sweeney noted that having a K-9 unit would reduce the street hours by 25%. Mayor Brekke suggested Chief Hughes draft a cost justification report. Chief Hughes stated he would do this. Mr. Link stated that the growth of the City should justify having a K-9 unit. Chief Hughes stated that the Police Department needs eight cars. It was the consensus of the Council to purchase two new vehicles and keep Unit No. 960 in service. Jane DuBois entered the meeting at 4:53 p.m. Mary Athmann reported on the Fire Department vehicles. Chief Athmann stated that the 1974 Mack truck needs to be replaced. He also indicated that the Fire Department would like a small utility truck for the assistant chiefs. Chief Athmann noted that some assistant chiefs have to respond to fires in their individual vehicles so the liability is increased even though they try and obey the traffic laws. Chief Athmann noted that one of the pumpers was out of service after Derby Days. Bob Sweeney noted that the City cannot continue to provide fire vehicles at the rate it had previously. He noted that the City has more first line pumper trucks than other cities of the same size or larger. Mayor Brekke questioned whether it would be adequate to have four good frontline pumpers and no reserves and Chief Athmann replied that it would be adequate. Jane DuBois stated she would like to have more information as to the number of firefighters and also questioned whether the City had a reciprocity agreement. Chief Athmann replied that reciprocity was in effect, however, the response time can be a problem. Chief Athmann stated that the size of fire determines the number of pumpers needed. Deb Amundson questioned whether there was a standard number of pumpers based on population and square miles. Chief Athmann replied that the ISO rating is based on population and square mileage. Dave Thompson suggested using the 1974 truck as a backup for another year. Mr. Sweeney stated that if the waterpump system was replaced, the truck could be used as a backup. Mayor Brekke noted that other repairs will be needed as well. Jeff Kaley questioned whether used equipment would be available to purchase. Chief Athmann replied Official Proceedings of the August 10, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 3 that this type of useable equipment is not usually available. Mayor Brekke stated in light of other budget items, the City needed to conserve where it could. It was the consensus of the Council to postpone purchasing a new pumper in 2000 and repair the 1974 Mack for backup use. Chief Athmann stated he would find out how much the repairs would cost to bring the vehicle to a standby use standard. Jane DuBois noted that at some point it is not cost effective to repair vehicles. Mayor Brekke noted that the 1992 GMC also needs repair work which should be included in the budget. Mr. Sweeney stated that $25,000 for a utility truck seemed high. Chief Athmann stated that with lights and other equipment, the cost would be in the $25,000 range. Mayor Brekke suggested buying a minivan, however, Chief Athmann did not feel the vehicle would need to be used for driving to trainings, etc. It was the consensus of the Council that purchasing a utility vehicle would be approved. Bruce Loney approached the podium to discuss the Public Works Department vehicles. Regarding the street equipment, Mr. Loney noted that the single axle dump truck cab and chassis had already been ordered and included in the budget. Mr. Loney stated there was a long backlog on the cab and chassis. Mr. Loney stated that the department also needed a chipper and a one-ton pickup truck and tractor. He noted that the City could probably get as much in trade for the current unit, but that a larger unit was needed. Regarding the park equipment, Bruce Loney stated that a large mower is needed. He noted that a reasonable trade amount could probably be received for the current model, however, it needed to be replaced due to the amount of problems. Bob Sweeney questioned why Mr. Loney would like to replace the Toro mower with another Toro mower if problems are encountered. He stated that the City needed to be more aggressive in getting the warranties adhered to. Jane DuBois questioned whether extended warranties should be purchased. Mayor Brekke did not think it would be cost effective to do so. Larry Meilleur questioned whether the City should look at the privatization of mowing parks. Mr. Loney replied the City could look at that option if they were able to find a reliable service. Mayor Brekke asked Mr. Loney to perform a quick analysis of that possibility. Mr. Sweeney stated that in other cities, the public works employees submitted bids. Mr. Loney stated that the department needs a steady maintenance force and it would be difficult to have a department only dealing with snowplowing. Regarding the sewer equipment, Bruce Loney stated that the current one-ton truck was adequate for hauling light machinery but was otherwise underpowered. Regarding the storm drainage equipment, Bruce Loney stated that the City had been renting a tractor backhoe/loader. Bob Sweeney questioned whether the City could rent the equipment cheaper than purchasing its own equipment. Mr. Loney stated that the rental Official Proceedings of the August 10, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 4 cost would be higher next year due to the numerous ponds and ditches constructed the past few years. Mr. Sweeney questioned what the cost would be to buy the equipment used. Mr. Loney stated it would probably cost somewhere in the range of $35,000. Mark McQuillan approached the podium to discuss the Park & Recreation equipment. Mr. McQuillan distributed a brochure regarding a Showmobile which is a self-contained mobile unit brought to sites for summer concerts, plays, etc. Mr. McQuillan stated that a Showmobile is less costly to maintain and more versatile than a band shelter in addition to being easy to operate. Mr. McQuillan noted that other groups could rent the unit from the City. Mr. McQuillan estimated a band shelter would cost about $200,000 including seating and landscaping. Jane DuBois stated that if the City were to invest $85,000 for a Showmobile, it may be better to invest $200,000 and receive a permanent facility. Bob Sweeney stated that the other cities which have Showmobiles are much larger than Shakopee. Mr. Sweeney suggested removing a Showmobile from the 2000 budget. Mr. McQuillan stated that a Showmobile could probably be rented for about $1,500 per day. Mayor Brekke suggested including rental fees in the 2000 budget and see how the Showmobile works before purchasing. Jane DuBois questioned whether anything was going to be done to Huber Park. Bob Sweeney stated since the area was in a flood plain, it would be too costly. Ms. DuBois stated that she had researched the matter and that the problem could be fixed. Dave Thompson stated that he hoped Huber Park would be useable for future Derby Days. R. Michael Leek approached the podium regarding the Building Department vehicles. Mr. Leek noted that the department will have five positions and a lot of time is spent getting into difficult sites. Mr. Leek suggested purchasing a Ford Ranger Extended Cab 4 x 4. Dave Thompson thanked all departments present for their work during Derby Days. Bruce Loney reapproached the podium to discuss the General Fund Budget for 2000 as relates to the Engineering Department. Mr. Loney stated there were not a lot of changes. Some of the changes highlighted were an increase in professional services and replacement of a plotter. Regarding the street department, Mr. Loney noted that additional staffing was needed. Mr. Loney stated he prepared a memo which would be distributed at the next budget meeting. Mr. Loney also noted that the department was trying to become more computer savvy. Official Proceedings of the August 10, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 5 Bob Sweeney stated that the City may need to increase assessments to property owners for repairs and improvements. Mayor Brekke stated some of the repairs are minor and inexpensive and it would not be justifiable to perform the paperwork involved. Mayor Brekke suggested having a discussion of the City's assessment policy at a future Council meeting. Bruce Loney discussed the budget for the shop and noted it was pretty much the same as the previous year's. Regarding the park maintenance budget, Mr. Loney stated that another employee was needed. He stated that his department was the only one which requested an additional employee last year and did not receive it. Mr. Loney noted that the building maintenance was also increased. Jane DuBois stated that she did not have a problem with approving another park maintenance person. She noted she had received several complaints about the youth softball fields. Bob Sweeney suggested using Sentence to Serve people. Bruce Loney stated they are used as much as possible but are not going to make up the deficit of having another employee. Mayor Brekke stated he was not opposed to hiring another employee but that all available manpower should be used. Sweeney/Amundson moved to adjourn to August 17, 1999, at 7:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, 7.7.ol,(.�t� e). udith S. C x ity Clerk Janet Vogel Freeman Recording Secretary OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ.REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA AUGUST 17, 1999 Mayor Brekke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with Councilmembers Amundson, Link, DuBois and Sweeney present. Also present: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director/City Engineer; R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director; Gregg Voxland, Finance Director; Paul Snook, Economic Development Authority Coordinator, and Jim Thomson, City Attorney. The pledge of allegiance was recited. The following items were added to the agenda: 15.B.2 Park Bond Proposal; 15.D.1. . Sidewalk Replacement Panels; and 16.A. Discussion regarding the Muenchow Fields.. Sweeney/DuBois moved to approve the agenda as modified. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Brekke gave the Mayor's Report. The following items were added to the Consent Agenda: 15.B.1. Authorize Ad for Bids for the Municipal Swimming Pond; 15.C.1. Super America Appeal of Board of Adjustment & Appeals Decision Regarding a Sign Variance; 15.C.3. Vacation of Shawmut Street between 2nd and 3rd Avenues and Easterly Adjacent Alley - Res. No. 5200; and 15.D.1. Sidewalk Replacement Panels. The following item was removed from the Consent Agenda: 14.A. Final Plat of EverGreen Heights, located south of Vierling.Drive and east of Fire Station No. 51 Res. 5201. DuBois/Link moved to approve the Consent Agenda as modified. Link/Sweeney moved to amend the Consent Agenda by removing 15.E.4. from Consent. Motion carried unanimously. Motion carried unanimously on main motion as amended. Mayor Brekke asked if there were any interested citizens in the audience who wished to address the City Council on any item not on the agenda. There was no response. DuBois/Link moved to approve Bills in the amount of $1,044,990.75. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Official Proceedings of the August 17, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 2 Cncl. Sweeney reported that the CIP Plans which include $19 million over a 6-year period were adopted at the last Public Utilities Commission meeting. A recess was taken at 7:13 p.m. for the purpose of conducting the Economic Development Authority meeting. The meeting re-convened at 7:35 p.m. Michael Leek explained that the Final Plat of EverGreen Heights was removed from the Consent Agenda due to inquiries regarding possible regulation of tenancy in the proposed project. Chief Dan Hughes provided information relating to the ordinances and license regulations that the City of Minneapolis has with respect to felony convictions and occupation of multiple family housing. In addition, the management company for the proposed property has rules regarding occupancy of their rental housing project which are similar to those of Minneapolis but are not in the form of a City Ordinance or licensing procedure at this time. The management company's rules are stated in terms of a conviction felony level crime which allows them to reject a perspective tenant. Mr. Leek addressed another issue related to access to the proposed property. The proposed access is on Vierling Drive at.the western boundary. There is no second access off of the property. However, there is a continuous roadway connection to the proposed daycare. Scott County has stated that only one access would be allowed off of County Road 16, because the potential future daycare would need an access. They have also stated that they will not support or approve a connection from the townhouse project to the daycare facility; and, that if there were a connection that they would not allow the daycare facility to have access onto CR-16.. Concerns were also raised regarding the relationship between the access and the curve and slope of Vierling Drive. Michael Leek explained that the Final Plat is consistent with the Preliminary Plat and there are very limited access options for this property. He also stated that language regarding noise mitigation was incorporated in the proposed Resolution No. 5201, which states that future noise mitigation would not be the responsibility of the City of Shakopee as this is not a home owner's association project. Bruce Loney reported that the City is waiting for Scott County to review and accept the alignment plan for County Road 16. Negotiations as to the conditions of the turnback of County Road 17 will begin once that acceptance is received. Greg McClenahan, EverGreen Heights, approached the podium to address questions relating the a possible future connection on County Road 16. He said the slopes would not permit a road and there would be grade issues. He said the one access to Vierling Drive would be adequate, that the idea was to use the road to Vierling Drive. When asked if an access were possible on the west, he said that is where an access would work the Official Proceedings of the August 17, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 3 best. He said it is very likely that the Mn/DOT parcel will be purchased for use by the childcare center. A discussion ensued regarding differing opinions in relation to access. Sweeney/Amundson offered Resolution No. 5201, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Approving the Final Plat of Evergren Heights, and moved its approval. A discussion ensued regarding berms and fence height. Sweeney/Amundson moved to amend Resolution No. 5201 by stating that a 3'-5' fence shall be constructed on top of the proposed berm, as determined by elevation. Motion carried 4-1 with Cncl. DuBois opposed. Motion carried 4-1 on Resolution No. 5201, as amended with Cncl. DuBois opposed. DuBois/Link moved to accept James R. Kiecksee resignation from the Shakopee Fire Dept. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). DuBois/Link authorized an exemption from the "No Parking" restriction on 17th Avenue East near Sunpath Elementary School between August 18, 1999, and August 27, 1999, (inclusive) for final construction phase of the school parking lot. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) DuBois/Link offered Resolution No. 5207, A Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for Improvements to the Municipal Swimming Pond in Lions Park, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Mark McQuillan reported that two public forums were recently held by the Park and Recreation Advisory Board to gather public input on a possible parks referendum this fall. There was a general consensus of the Board members to ask the City Council to present another referendum to the voters. State Statute normally requires governmental agencies to wait 180 days before bringing back the same referendum. However, if the referendum is different it may be held within the 180 day period. Jeff Kaley, Chair of the Park and Recreation Advisory Board, approached the podium. He said the key points from those meetings included a lot of support for the Community Center, trail systems, community parks, and land acquisition. He said the big ticket items are not items that will be budgeted from a capital improvement standpoint, and the smaller projects will differ from the last referendum. Another item that was discussed from a Official Proceedings of the August 17, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 4 Community Center expansion point was tennis courts. This was calculated with a permanent building as well as with a bubble system over existing courts. Gretchen Theis,2134 Muhlenhardt Rd, approached the podium and stated that at the last two meetings people were very enthusiastic with a lot of participation. She said the biggest goal will be in educating the public as to the needs of the community and to move forward. Toby Berens, 5345 Holmes St., approached the podium stated that it is time for the tak payers to incorporate more tax dollars into the park system rather than relying on service clubs such as the Lions and the Jaycees. John Berens, 206 Spencer St., approached the podium and stated that he wants to see the city grow as a park system. He said the parks are neglected and it is time for the public to spend some money. Sean Laughlin, 629 Spencer St., approached the podium and stated that this is a good time to ask the public to look at the referendum again. He said this package is more aggressive and reflects what the community deserves. A discussion ensued regarding the previously failed referendum. There was some speculation that it failed because it was a special election and therefore the turnout was not what it should have been. Mayor Brekke explained that a study was conducted to determine how much money to spend on land acquisition for parks. That amount is approximately $23 million over 20 years. He suggested putting together a referendum package for land acquisition with the idea that this would ease the burden of park dedication fees. He then asked if park dedication fees might be used as a funding source for some of the Community Center improvements. Mark McQuillan stated that park dedications can be accepted as land or cash, and that the park dedication fees can be spent in a variety of ways. However, the funds are often not paid right away. He said if you depend on park dedication fees to build the Community Center you could wait a long time. Cncl. Sweeney stated that he would support any referendum that allows the public to determine how tax dollars will be spent. However, he cautioned that if this fails it will be along time before park and recreation referendums are presented again. Sweeney/Amundson moved to direct staff to meet with its bond counsel to provide an analysis of the bond amount for a park bond referendum. Motion carried unanimously. • Official Proceedings of the August 17, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 5 Sweeney/Amundson moved to direct the City Attorney to draft the appropriate language to be placed on the referendum ballot. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Amundson moved to direct staff to prepare the appropriate Resolutions for the City Council's next Regular Session. Motion carried unanimously. A recess was taken at 8:25 p.m. The meeting re-convened at 8:35 p.m. DuBois/Link offered Resolution No. 5212, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, overturning the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, and allowing the erection of a freestanding sign on CSAH 83, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). DuBois/Link moved to appoint David Kriesel to the position of Building Inspector at Step 1 of pay grade H, effective August 19, 1999, contingent on successful completion of a pre-employment physical. Upon completion of the 6-month probationary period, Mr. Kriesel would be moved to Step 2. Six months later,Mr. Kriesel would be moved to Step 3. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). DuBois/Link offered Resolution No. 5200, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee Vacating part of Shawmut Street and Alley Right of Way in Block 34, Original Shakopee City Plat, City of Shakopee, Scott County, 1Vlinnesota, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). DuBois/Link moved to approve expenditures in the amount of $85,325 to insure the City's computer systems are year 2000 compliant. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). DuBois/Link moved to authorize the Public Works Department to pay C.R. Fischer & Sons, Inc. an additional $7,674.57 for sidewalk panels, to be funded from the existing Street Pavement Preservation Budget. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). Five bids were received for the 1999 Street Overlay on 11th Avenue, from CSAH 17 to Merrifield Street, and Block 6 Alley Reconstruction. The low bid was submitted by W.M. Mueller & Sons with a bid total of$42,575.25. This compares to the feasibility study of $39,377.53. This bid is 11 percent higher than the engineer's estimate or $3000 overall. $40,000 was budgeted for overlays and patching in the 1999 City Budget. These funds will be used along with assessments to pay for the project improvements. A budget amendment of $13,000 is needed in order to fully fund the alley project, as it was not budgeted. If this project is awarded, staff will also request a 5% contingency to cover minor change orders or quantity adjustments that may occur. Official Proceedings of the August 17, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 6 DuBois/Sweeney offered Resolution No. 5208, A Resolution Accepting Bids on the 1999 Street Overlay (11th Avenue, from County, State Aid Highway 17 to Merrifield Street) and Block 6 Alley Reconstruction, Project No. 1999-6, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. DuBois/Amundson moved to authorize a 5%'contingency amount for use by the City Engineer in authorizing change order 'or-quantity adjustments on the 1999-6 Project. Motion carried unanimously. - DuBois/Amundson moved to direct the Finance Director to prepare a budget amendment in the amount of$13,000 to the Pavement Preservation Account in the Street Division for funding of the 1999-6 Project. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Amundson offered Resolution No. 5209, A Resolution Accepting Bids on Vierling Drive, from County State Aid Highway 17 to Miller Street Project No. 1999-5. Motion failed unanimously. DiBois/Sweeney moved to reject the bids received for Project No. 1999-5, Vierling Drive, from CSAH 17 to Miller Street and direct staff to prepare a revised feasibility report. Motion carried unanimously. DuBois/Amundson moved to direct staff not to proceed further with the appeal to the County for a right turn in off of Marschall Road to the K-mart site. Motion carried unanimously. • This motion does not countermand the condition in the resolution approving the Final Plat of Vierling Plaza requiring certain public improvements. DuBois/Link offered Resolution No. 5210, A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 5038, A Resolution Setting Fees for City Licenses, Permits, Services and Documents, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). • DuBois/Link offered Ordinance No. 552, Fourth Series, An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending Section 6.41, Subd. 1 of the City Code to Delete the Definitions of Masseur and Masseuse and Add the Definition of Massage Therapist, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). DuBois/Link offered Resolution No. 5211, A Resolution Accepting Work on Fire Station Number#2, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda). • Official Proceedings of the August 17, 1999 Shakopee City Council Page 7 Sweeney/Amundson moved to declare the following items surplus property to be sold: 1993 Ford Crown Vic #2FACP71W4PX155477 1984 GMC pickup #1GTDC14D8EJ514580 1988 Pontiac Grand Am #1G2NE54U3JC712962 Motion carried unanimously. • Mayor Brekke stated that recommendations from staff should find their way to the City Council Agenda rather than to the activity report. He wanted to make sure that the recommendation to install irrigation at the George Muenchow Field is on a future agenda. A recess was taken at 8:50 p.m. for the purpose of conducting an executive session to discuss pending litigation. The meeting re-convened and the Mayor stated.that there was no action taken during the executive session. The meeting was adjourned to August 19, 1999, at 4:30 p.m. The meeting concluded about 9:00 p.m. • t (� J iWJth S. Cox °A/6 ity Clerk Esther TenEyck Recording Secretary OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA DECEMBER 6, 1999 Mayor Brekke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with Councilmembers Link, Amundson, Sweeney and Dubois present. Also present were Mark McNeill, City Administrator; Gregg Voxland,Finance Director;R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director; and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk. Mayor Brekke announced that this is a special meeting to conduct a public hearing on the 1999/2000 tax levy and budget. Sweeney/Amundson moved to approve the agenda. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Brekke opened the public hearing on the 1999/2000 tax levy and budget. Councilmember Sweeney explained the various steps that are involved to determine the amount of taxes that is paid on a particular parcel of land beginning with the assessor's market value that is placed on each parcel until the taxes are collected by the county and the City's portion is given to the City. Included was an explanation of how residential property is treated differently than commercial and industrial property. Using the(truth in taxation) statement that he had received from the County on his property, Cncl.Sweeney explained how the tax capacity is arrived at. He explained that the amount of dollars certified to the County by the City for the 2000 budget has actually been reduced because it included the fire station and the referendum on the community center expansion, which failed. As a result, the taxes will be less than those on the statements. For most properties in Shakopee, the taxes for the City will drop. This will not be the case where there is new construction, however. With the use of a line graph, Cncl.Sweeney explained the residential levy impact on four parcels that have been tracked for the last five years. Although the market value of the property has gone up, the taxes have actually been reduced or are flat for three of the parcels and only up slightly on the fourth. Using a pie chart, Cncl.Sweeney explained the use of City tax dollars: 10%is debt service to pay for public improvements, 83%is for operations and 7%is to pay for debt service including the referendum for the fire station. With the use of a pie chart, he explained how the general fund tax dollars are apportioned among the various City departments: Police,Fire, and Inspections= 40%,Engineering, Street and Shop=20%, Park Maintenance and Recreation= 11%, Other= 3% and the balance is for general government including Council, Administration,Finance, Planning, etc. Cncl.Sweeney identified the various sources of revenue and identified the total expenditures proposed for 2000. At the end of the year 2000 there will be a budget surplus. The increase in tax levy dollars for 2000 over 1999 is approximately.9%. Official Proceedings of the December 6, 1999 December 6, 1999 Page -2- Cncl. Sweeney explained the various enterprise funds: Shakopee Public Utilities, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Drainage and Recreation. These Enterprise Funds are for a use base rate and if they are not used, then one does not have to pay into them. The Equipment and Building Funds were created to level off the City's needs over a number of years, i.e.: purchasing of fire vehicles and building City facilities. Using a pie chart, Cncl.Sweeney explained how the total tax dollars were spread out among the various taxing jurisdictions in 1999. Twenty percent went to the City of Shakopee, and that percentage will reduce in 2000. Cncl.Sweeney and Mr. Voxland responded to questions from members of the Council. Mayor Brekke asked if there was anyone in the audience who had any questions or wished to address the City Council regarding the proposed tax levy and budget. A gentleman in the audience had questions regarding the tax statement he had received. Cncl.Sweeney responded to his questions and invited him to speak with the Finance Director if he had further questions. Mayor Brekke asked if there were any additional questions from the audience. There was no response. Mayor Brekke announced that the tax levy and budget would be adopted at a hearing on December 21, 1999, at city hall as part of the regular Council meeting. Mayor Brekke closed the public hearing. Since the public hearing was concluded, he noted that there was no need to continue the meeting to December 13, 1999. Sweeney/DuBois moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 8:07 p.m. tah,d. a.lc J dith S. Cox City Clerk Recording Secretary IIS CITY OF SHAKOPEE ICONS .w :9`' Memorandum TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: City Bill List DATE: December 16, 1999 Introduction and Background Attached is a print out showing the division budget status for 1999 based on data entered as of 12/16/99 . Also attached is a regular council bill list for invoices processed to date for council approval . Included in the checklist but under the control of the EDA are checks for the EDA General Fund (code 0191) in the amount of $148 .76. Also included in the checklist but under the control of the S.W. Metro Drug Task Force (code 9825) are checks in the amount of $9, 180 . 56 . Not included in the attached bill list but included in the total amount of bills shown on the agenda is the below listed subsistence/travel reimbursement for an employee. The employee (s) were away from their normal work site for a business purpose but the meal itself was not a "business purpose meal" or there was no receipt/odometer readings and therefore needs to be paid through payroll as taxable income. Jeff Tate $29 .46 Action Requested Move to approve the bills in the amount of $923, 927. 67. CITY OF SHAKOPEE EXPENSES BY DEPARTMENT 12/16/99 CURRENT YEAR ANNUAL MONTH TO PERCENT DEPT DEPT NAME BUDGET ACTUAL DATE EXPENDED 11 MAYOR & COUNCIL 74,080 92 93,767 127 12 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 219,200 6,555 178,069 81 13 CITY CLERK 201,220 6,984 171,875 85 15 FINANCE 348,770 9,159 324,064 93 16 LEGAL COUNSEL 269,000 6,924 323,514 120 17 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 737,468 37,710 521,645 71 18 GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 232,230 6,878 179,344 77 31 POLICE 1,931,330 70,567 1,742,656 90 32 FIRE 618,420 3,749 479,149 77 33 INSPECTION-BLDG-PLMBG-HTG 340,962 14,811 319,493 94 41 ENGINEERING 507,620 17,544 450,415 89 42 STREET MAINTENANCE 827,730 16,121 660,132 80 44 SHOP • 145,330 7,000 134,101 92 46 PARK MAINTENANCE 492,090 23,273 425,008 86 91 UNALLOCATED 589,550 318 1,102,308 187 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 7,535,000 227,688 7,105,540 94 17 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 676,180 42,365 543,526 80 TOTAL TRANSIT 676,180 42,365 543,526 80 00 N/A 0 0 785 0 19 EDA 403,170 2,244 146,902 36 TOTAL EDA 403,170 2,244 147,687 37 H a) rn m P4 _ Q w aaa CU a w as as aawaa,aaalaawan,aaaaan,wawaalwaaaw H li H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H TV U) H _- x w 01 ow 01 a X 01 ri t U W 0 • O Z U 1 W 1.01p l0 w A N N N al 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 H C.) 01 0101 010101 0101 0101 0101 01 01 0101 0101 0101 0101 0101 0101 0101 01 01 0101 H 1 to to U) H H H [N co 0 N N N O In N N 01 01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. cr CA CA '-'iHi"itOr'1 CO dl dl 1.0 000000000000000>>>>>>>>>>>>>> co AAA 0 VI r 0101 00 1114141414141414.14141414141414100000000000000 M www o w In 1.0 ti) 00 AAAAAf]AC]AAAAfaAAzzzzzzzzzzzzzz H U5 TI4 CO rn co oN in CD r4 1-1 01 01 01 01 04 CV CV CV CV 01 CV CV 01 l0 lO 01 01 01 CV CV CV 01 CV 04 01 01 01 01 UD H O au0ap M r N COM CO CD MMMMMMMMMMMM01%I)UDMMMi1')MMMMMMMMMlO W' H HH rl [r ri N M5 rl ri H riHHH ri rl riH ri rl ri H H H H H H H H H H riHH riH rlH CD W d1 N N N Tr N M d1 M N N d1 d1 d1 d1 VI d1 d1 W d1 W d1 d1 VIN N d1 Tr d1 Tr d1 VI VI d1 d1 W VI VI VI N 0 t I I I 1 I I I I I I lit 1 1 1 l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U i In N N N H N H H O N N O O O O O ri O O O O O O O N N O O O O O H O O O O O O O N O N Hr-IH H ri O HH rl ri N M U)r 0001 H M ri N W N In ri H N M In Cs x001 H M H 01 TV N 01 gi 00 01 01 01 cr 01 O 5 r 01 01 H rl ri H H H M M VI d/d1 W0 N 01 01 H H H H H H M M Tr d1 VI 1.0 Cs 01 01 O O O O O 01 O 01 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ✓i ✓i 0 •.1 CO ill >4 EA z z a H CO 41 0 W 1 4 H EA ww 5 a ICJ X a qpc_ E 03 ri ri w w W - tr) w o 0 14.1-1 a 41 P4 I-I co A H AZa Cl)CCl or) CaAAAC1nalnAAAfaC]?1>IC]AnCialAC-IAAAA(zIC]?I rT4 WWa) O OD OO d1 HHH E+HHHHHHHHHr•CIQ;HHHHHHHHHHHHHIQ; EnX9 CO 14 NCO a a0aa0aaaaa0aaa0000000000000 s ° 03 Owwwwwww Uwm Cl) 10 U aa Hwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww C7 Cl0141.1 W to CA ' 04H HH WWWWP4114fs.0t.D4G4G444D4D4CLI f>:4D444D444D404aP404(14D4G4D4 FC H W 0 M H 0 41 0 0 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H zao A w z ox 00 00000000000000000000000000000 r. C4 HH En CD OD CO CO CO CO 0/CA OD O m CO OD CO OD CD CO CO CO m CO m VD CO CO CO CO CO `" wwww 41 41 41 CO CO > >>>>>>a >>�>>y�>�>>>>>>>>> 0 C4 a H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 000 a CO r4 1:4000 >1 EAEA�EAEAEHHHj1HAEAEAAEAEAEAEAAIHAHHIHAHIHAHHHIHAHIH�EHG�HG1HHH En HHH o4 LD HH C4 fat 44 P4F>~{xf>~fxP:4GfxWf>~L>'.PGf>rgggggggggPGgf>~P4f>~gg CO41 H HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HH U]EnCOCOCOCOCOu)EncnCO01COCOCO000OCOCO W CA CO CA CA CO CO CO CO CO a H W W W W H W DI a s H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 0 000 c z 00 zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 0 '-i H H H H W z a s a s HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH CI Z zH'�., ez4 r4 IX D�� Z HH^��Hj^ as (^X]�1 Zf�(^Z(^�'1111(f^Z�11X(^�Z]11CZ]gZq(^Xq�I Z(^Z�1 gZ(^Z11 gZZZZ(Z11Z ZZ ZZ1 qZ(^Z�IZZgZ X(^Z11 o cw/�CWi]Cwil (24 A OO Qcc/) IQIISI.WIQjQIQjQQQQW QQQIiiQQQQIQ�iQWIQ�iWQWQQW H w UU Cxxx4 99 aQaaQQQaQQQ QQaQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ 0 0 0 a [x W H H z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z W AAA w Cl) o0 M 00000000000000000000000000000 W W W a` HE.) U U H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H FA w g44444444g44444ag4a4 U [xi a,a '0 H Z EE zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz * * 11 i1 is * OD O0 OOU)U) 00 00 00 ("-05 000 CV un 00 OD O a00 d1 I-U)M U)I-00 C4 CA r.Tr 0 op 0 T h U)MU)[-O In U) td ri U)N 00 Cr dl 00 CD MU) U)O U) O1 In ri 0.-O cr M 01 M l0 N h U)O ap CA OD N Tr 0 cr M 01 M 10 NL`Ino 00 0NNLI) Intra in in 00 In01d1 lW NOD 10001Od1Orld10 Ns0OD03 CDTr10NN10TrC)HTV03N d'OOO o 00 CO Vl rl dl NN Hri Hri CDOD01 H10h TI M 1001 ri CV U)rHM N rl M M[r ina3N rI N N OIn rI M[-r1M 01 01 M co t/)-N t/}t? l0 10 HH 4.001 In N H M in.in-t/)-t/)•t/}t/I-In H H H t?4/1-H in-t/)•in-to-in-v)-in-tn-U)rl rl H t/}t/)-H t? - - .t? . 4/)-t/? in-r/} . . - 4/1-4/1.in- t?t/t t?t? 4/> 4/)-in-t?in- 4/)- MM ri N 10 TV 4.4 UC0-4/} t? t/} cr o In W H ri N r/1-vrt/r CL U W H CA W 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 at O1 01 01 H H 0 000 0 0 0 00 00 00000000000000000000000000000 0 4 \ \\\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\�\\\\\\\\\\\\\ W 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C4 H HrHH H H H HH HH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHr4 U 01 010101 01 01 01 0101 0101 T 01010101010101010101010101.010101010101010101010101010101 U w 01 01 01 01 CA 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0101 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 CA W .'ll 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 CA CA CA 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 U 0 H H H H H H H H ri H H H ri H H H ri r4 rl ri ri ri ri ri ri ri ri H H rH H rl H rl H ri H H H ri 0 F1 Z H N CO d1 In 40 5 O U H H HH H HH x a) A co A co A a0 A co A CO A a) A 00 - . F71Z U M* M 10 V 10 * M is Mk m 4, Mk M4. M 0CO V 10 V 10 V 10 V 1.0 V 1.0 V 10 U U N N t3) it CL Ri a a a a a Z ZWZZZZMW Z Z Z x Z Z x x Z Z Z x H H H H H H 0 00000000 000 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 w Ul H .. W 01 O GO al C4 H p H Z w0 A Z I N.0 W 01 H U 01 H O) O M t`l-t�t`t`t`t`t` d'U)M V' t0 d' tart- U2 0 0) O N t`t`Nl`Nl`Nt` CVNU) N N U) N N N M O H CON CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO OD M W CO CO N01 CO COO H H H 0 O 0 et. V' O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0) U) O O H 0 0 0 N Z O o vi V' O 00000000 000 d' tD o o UD 000 py W 0 fc) CO CO 0 HHHHHHHH 0 0 0 0 0 H N O 0 0 0 0 H�a H t0 m co t- N H NN NN NN NN MHH cN d' N N M HHH d' PUH dMM MM MM MM MN M d'1 H H ' NN N N N N N W W N d' N N N W V'V'd'V V'd'd'V' V'V'd' el V' d' M d' d'd'd' H 0 W I I I I I I l l l l l i l l i i 1 I l I l I I l I l U I N H CV N N d' d'NH0IHHHH Hd'd' H H H H M HHd' O U H W H H H CD NCD U)II M M N H tf N U) H N N O U1 H H U) CO 4 01 t0 0) 0) 01 H M H N W H M H M N N N M M M co tom. M H N N O to O O O 0 0 0 0 t0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t- 0 O O O 0) W W U U O W CO CO CO cn CO H H HH maw Z Z H Z at U aoq CO H vi cA H CO Ci En A X g ZZZZZZZZ mzz Z Z Z El 0 ZZZ Z '� W o OctW 00000000 ----HH W w 0 4 Z HHH W w > o 0 aaaaaaaa 1-4 El w a a W H HHH Z W a CON CD 14 01 d' Z aaaaaaaa 4 al al H H a 0 H al al al 0 lwl M M wWwwwwww as 01 01 w 0 0 aaa 01 14 H N N N HHHHHHHH H00 W W H 01 000 W W U • U al H H U H H el g H ElZ W 0 H Ei tO H H i I I 0 al u H H a Eiii a. C� U) H H a E+H H H H WZ 0 CO El w A zzz 0 z ^.4 Z U A A W t0!]c0q coq 0 0 0 W a al FC H H > HHHHHHHH A U r�C A a H 0 AC x a xuaGSuSudc$GSuN fes' °v w U zzz a H H Z al 0 x W 0 www w ZEl PG W U 0 0 HHHHHHHH aoqlcpnq U U U cO p;aI yi 0 a 0 0 0 44444444 QrCQ Q CO wwWWow0 0 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * O M 0 0 0 0 ON 0) U)U) N N to 10 CO 0)H U1 10 U)U) CO W O1 M 0 0 tit to W W 0 0 0 0 01 CO 1.11 N O HCDH O0 00 0)0) MM NN W HHt0U U)N10)t� 010010 OO MM MM 00 O0 MHM01 O d'V O 0 01 01 b t0 H H W t0 NCD CD O H 0 N 0 0) CO O N N U1 in M M t0 1.0 O O H H 0)O V'M U1 0 MU) 00 HH in in in in in in Hco-Ni/}i/ U)-WC10 d'U1MM MM HH HH HH 00 1'H0101 N L}01 0 0 LP U) H H V1-4/1- 01 01 LT i? 4/1-4.41.N i?t?i?H i/}i? 10 4.0 t?i? i?i? U)U) i/}i>in t/L- N N NN d•V' t0 t0 H X t? i?i? H H i?i? U t?i/? w i/r M OG U W El CO W 01 01 01 0) 0) to U)Ul Ul U)U)Ul U1 U) to in U1 U) in U1 U1 U1 U)U)U1 U) H H O O O O O H HHHHHHHH H H H H H H H H H H H H 0 A' \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ W A N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NNN N N N N N N N N . N GY. H H H H H H HHHHHHHH HHH H H H H H HHH H X \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ X U O) al al 0) O) 0) CN 0)01 01 01 01 01 01 0)0)0) O) 01 0) 01 01 01 O)al O) U W 01 0) 01 01 0) al 0)0)O)0)0)0)0)01 0)010) O) 0) O1 01 O1 01 01 01 01 W 'M 0) 0) 0) 0) O) 01 O1 0)0)O)O)O)O)0) 0)0)0) 0) 01 01 0) O) ON 0)O) 0) UU H H H H H H HHHHHHHH HHH H H H H H HHH H O a Z 0 H N M d' ill W. N Co al O H N M eN H N N N N N N N N N N CO co M M co C) x CD A ODA COA CO A CD A CD A CO A CO A CD A CD A CD A 0 A CD A Co A co U M* M* M* M* M* M* m * m * M* M* M* M* M* m * m toy toy t0 V toy t0 V toy t0 V l0 V toy toy toy to V l0 V W V t0 0 U m 0 trl n5 a x x x xxxxxxx x x x xx xxxx xxx xxxxxxx x H 0 0 0 0000000 0 0 0 00 0000 000 0000000 0 cr Ln H x w O, 0C Ol a I rn H L A oz I LO W 01 s H 0 01 N H CO CO Ol O1 01 01 O1 61 Ol Ol 0 LI)LI)to l0 O O O ri H H H N 0 LI) N N h NNNNL-L- N M NN 111 U1UlLn L'.0OU1 mmMMMmm Lf) H co W O CO 0 00 CO OD O 00 O\ M W CO CO CO H rl M 00 W 00 aD OD OD CO CO m N N NNNNNNN N • o Nt NNNN d1 d1 d1 NNNNNNN N H cr O O 0000000 0 0 O1 IDN 0000 dlcrCP 0000000 o H 0 0 0000000 0 1Z CA ri ri 0000 ,-Lriri 0000000 0 O O U) 0000000 O O Lit 0 0 M M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O EL H m H HrHHHH rlH m H rl un Ln W 0cr0 Hrl rl MMHHMmm rl pS N U) N N N N N N N N N m N N N N O N O N N N N N N N N N N N W N d1 d1 d d'd1 cr cr cr cr d d1 V1 d1 d M N M N N N N d1 d1 d1 d1 d/d'd1 d1 0 P9 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1111 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U I O 0 N cr rl ri riHH rl d1 Cr Cr Hri HMHM 000 r♦crri m Tr rl U d1 111 N 111 N r-1 1-1 U1 m C` LI) co N cr Cr M rl m ri cr cr d1 0 LI)CO LI)LI)H 00 N A1' CO lfl cr NMMOILSmH N H cr d1 cr mO1MOl 00 CO OD HN rl L.Nmri cr CI l0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0)Cl Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W C7 C7 U) W U U r.1 z i-1 U)U)ulWWU)U) H >10 0 aaa 0)CO U) O wwwwwww P Ism CO DI ill w H HHHHHHH PG „'� I L tQ,A',Q, HH H El >( aaaaaaa w El H yi>4>1 as a A. P14 aaa as as H U ICI HWH I�44 ElEiaaElElE+ a H a as aaa as z 8 aaa zzaazzz a 0g co C7 El U)U)U)U)U)U)En H WW aWW WWW HH�ulHHH W a0 z cncn waxa t7>7a7 A W , HZZZZZ HHHHHH Z (HJ) W HH OUAU CJCJzzUUC9 Z PGHAG H ZZHHZZZ H O > H HHHHHHH H U) H 0R:UR4 UUU HHHHHHH El • OPG g g g gIx g g A W 111 U U N O N O • • • a a g g A A A g O a H W[11[11414141 ill H 0 H PGR : oWNW 000 HHWWHHH fx) U H• Z 0000000 W a X XX NIll NW UUU U)al 0OPOPgall 0 En UUE)t) El U)U)U)U)U)U)U) HHHH 0 HHHHHHH g xxxa U) A 0000000 W > H H H H PG Z Q 0A888888 W H 0000 WaWaWaW00 x A 0U) lx w a calx alxrxa a H wwww WU)Cn d1 w w as a a a as a www wwwwwww Ln D. x 3333ZZZZZZZ x U wwwwwww Day U cn wwww 000 0000000 \ H g• 0 HHHHHHH FG W 0 HHHH '�77".�y��.' 'M"M"M"M"M"MM" 1 a z [..g D4 Ez4 44 CLI Ct4 a4 114 Ix..rt..f=.G.i Gi fs. U Ft H 0 0 RS W WCC FC 0000000 • C7 UUP HHH U]U]U)U)U)CnU) H 1 HHHHHHH x �� WWWW WWWggggggg H 11] A CO mmmamananaci U U U C)C.) UUUU UUU UUUUUUU U * * * * * * * * * * * * O 00 LI)LI) NN OlOOONMNNm NN 00 01 lOL-m 00000 0000 rid1lDLI)LI)0000N N O 00 d1 cr cr cr VD lD d1 ri m MO d1 MM 00 CA CA 0000) LI)LI)LI)Ln0 0000 H H m O LI)Cr)H L1 M LI) OO 1D l0 UD LI) H l0 rl O1 N H CO rl CO CO O0 Hri OD rl Cl N O N O LO OOOO LI)O d1 ri U)l0 Li)0 CO O N LI)LI) 0)0) M M cr N VD d1 rI Vf M co d1 d1 LO LD O O d1 M L, co CO-CO CO-LD Ln Li)LI)li) m r1 O L-r-i?N M N N d1 d1 H ri N N H irk M ri L? ri CO in-An- N N VD VD in-m M Vf L} rl d1 d1 Tr M in-En-H{1)-M- CA-01 N V>•V? (?d? (/f (/}in- (?(1> V?1/1- in-(/?• in-(? V} (?VI-(1- . VI- (? (/)- r1 N N H in d1 w in- U VT in.in - M M Lx 0 W H co W Li') to Ln U1 ti)U1 LI)LI)Li)in in Ln Li) LI)LI) Li)LI)N LI) LI)N LI) Li)Li)Ln Ln LI)Li)LI) in H H H H H ri H H ri rl H rl H H H ri H H H ri H ri H ri H H H rl H ri ri ri 0 i0 \ \ \ \\\\\\\ \ .. \ \\ \\\\ \\\ \\\\\\\ \ W A N N N N(NI N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C4 H ri H H H H H ri H H ri H ri ri H H ri H H ri H H H H H ri ri H ri ' H x \ \ \ \\\\\\\ \ \ \ \\ \\\\ \\\ \\\\\\\ \ • U al 0) Ol 01 CA 0l Ol 01 01 01 01 01 01 0)0) 01 01 01 0) 0)O1 01 01 01 01 0)0)CA 0) 0) U W O1 0) 01 0101 01010117101 01 01 0) al 0) 01 01 0)0) 0)0)0) 01 01 0)0)0)01 0) 0) W x 01 01 01 01 01 0)0l 01 O1 01 01 01 01 0)0) 0)01 0)al 0)0)0) 0)0l 0)0)0)0)01 01 M 0 H H H riHHH.-L riH H H H HH HHHH HHH HHHH ri ri r1 H 0 0 a z in l0 N CO 0) 0 H N M d1 U1 l0 H m M m M m W cr cP cr Cr d1 d1 O x A 00 A OD A COA CO A 0 A CO A CO A OD A OD A 00 A co A co Z U * m K m* M i. M * M K 1,1* M i1 M m is M M i1 M J W V W V l0 V lD V WV l0 V l0 V 1.0 V W V ID V 113V WV 1.0 O x O 0 nt., a, rn ro a xxxx x x x MX x MX x MX x x xxxxxXXX x x H 0000 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 00000000 0 0 w Ln H GI of o w O w H 0 A z H U H N N N N co N l0 N M 01 C\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 0 U)U)Ln U) U) M VD t.0 M M a)01 Ln N a0OOa0 CO c00003 H CO CO 00 CO a0 CO er V'l0 H M M co 00 O co N co a)CO 03 CO CO 00 CO VD N NNNN N N co to CV CO 1,1, N NN N N NNNNNNNN V' N H 0000 0 0 a1 U)l0 l0 1010 0 H H 0 l0 00000000 co U) 0 0 0 0 O 0 Vr H H M N N O N N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 01 0000 L[) in O 00 O 00 O 00 U) O 00000000 O O H H H M M H M H H H H H H M Ln H M H M M M M M M M M H H g N N N N N 14 N N N N N N M LIN er M N N N N N N N N N N P w w w w d' w w w d'w d' d'w V' V w ,,r al d'V V V'V w er d' w w 01:11 1111 1 1 1 ) 1 1 ii i ii I ) 11111111 I I U i H H H H N H 01 V4 V H H H H 0O H H H N HV'0OH0VV H H 0 V'NNH N H N 1.11 In H NN Ln NN H N COCONNHNMLn N H 4 V'W V'M V' V' Lo N r m V'l0 N er 10 V' H H H M CO M V 1.0 N M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 O 01 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 54 O p H H EA Q. H cn 0 0 W Z W CO r] W W N U) U)U) W U) ra H En En O W W al W W W W W W 0 W U) > W W 0 H H H H H H Z H Aa H H H as a a as a as w a a w a aaHH \ C4 aa, a as H C4 \ cn H HHHHHH C4 a H C4 a,zz co w C4 CU a as W CU CO �] 24�T.+ Cl 'r7"rOHH zi A 0 0 A r�7r0 H '0 z �i HHHHHHHH U'0] 0 0) HCa C/) 0 W U)U) U) CO CO CO 01 0U C7 HH Z 0 Xggggggg L7 rn C7 W C7 0 U) H 0 0 0 0 0 0 E A zzC70 aL Z Z Z Z M zz C4 H C70C)000 z z 00 H H z z 4 H HH H H H H \ W H H U) ',Z z z z z z z z H H HHaRRqH H 0 H HH H HH r-1 XH IX CO HHHHHHHH H H g F�raF7 W U) g g g g >GI Hg U0 ] w aAaaaAaa g i02 al Ell H a as a as g as 0 a HHHHHHHH a s 000)U) cn 0 00 0 00 H W0 U) a U)0)CO rnal alalal 0 0 0 0 0 0 (� 0 HH zz FZ H 00 H W >+ H H 0 U) U) H 0 a s 0 C.) 0 cif) H IX 0 0 M H m 03[13 oo U)cxn cgn4 cn w H O r� a4 W S 0 WWWWWWWW C) 41 �� O W co 0) (Y., 1H oo CO 41 54 CD CD CD CD cD C9 0 0 41 CO FA to 00000000 UU)) NNNN H CO O C)C.) x U)w z W CD 00 C7 C7 CD 00 C4 ' ' H H0 rk CO U) 44 H H U) r4 04 H E H W 0 '0 ZZ 00 H Ww W U) HHHHHHHH 0l .'ai HHg4g4 w H co ww w w axxxrxxxa w H al z HHHHHHHH H w wwwwwwww 0 H co co . coW H a NNNNNNNN W W HHHH 0 0 g ';0 AjO 'Ji 17 I'D 0 r74 G4 Z '< 0 0000 0 0 0 00 0 0A A 43 41 W W wrm.4afs,www4, Cr, w * * * * * * * 4, * * * * * 4k er 0001 V'N MM 00 NN 1001 Ln MM CO CO lO -Ln Ln 000 00 MM 0 Lf)M M 0000 H U)U) 00 HV'N l0 N 0 H H0 O CO CD N N U) N N d'V'01 V4 V' 0 0 0 O O er V' M H Ln H 0 N 0 0 01 0)O1 V'V• r0 N00U) NN 00 HH 0Oa010 00 U)Ln0 CA CA ill OU) U)Ln U)U) Nri100MO1C1PI Coon Ln Ln NN O a0O11O0)N Nb 1010 MM MU)01 r-r- NNN NN 'I) NH NN NN CAU)01MU)HHN W COO) 1010 .QFC, M.r1 in-M.N V)-i/? H H 0)0) L)•L}L>• +f}L} N N eon Lf LJ- O l0 N H H co-in- U)L-in-H 10 M N N 0 4/1-4/3. H H L} L} Ch-C/} (41-4/} L}L}L} VI-TA .4/} L}L}L}L} . t/} x m Ln a0 H H U) L} C4 un }L }L} L} VT(0. W M M 0 M H U] W to U)Ln Ln LnU) U) Ln U) U) U)in U) to U) U) to N Ln to U)N to N N LI) U) H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H HHHHHH H H H 0 Q \\\\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\\\\\\\ \ \ W A NNNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N . N C4 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H HHHHHH H H H g \\\\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\\\\\\\ \ \ g 0 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 al 01 01 01 01 01 01 al a1 01 a1 a1 T O1 a1 al a' 01 0 W 01 01 01 01 01 01 is 01 01 o1 01 01 01 01 01 a1 01 01 a1 a1 01 a1 01 01 01 01 0) W x alrn alal a1 al al aim al 01 01 al alal o1 al 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 al al W 0 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H HHHHHH H H H 00 r7 Z l0 N CO 01 0 H N M V' U) W N co O1 H V' V' V• V' N in U) U) -U) U) U) Ln 0 ?+L co A oo A 00A COA CO A 00 A CO A CO A CO A a0 A co A a) A CO A CO A 7z 0 M 4, M 4, M* M* M k M 4. m * m k m * M* M* m * M uk M+ W V WV W V WV W V W V W V WV W V W V WV l0 V W V l0 V 0 0 V (I) to ro P4 xxx xx xxx xxxxx xxx x xxx x xxxx x x xxx H 0 00 00 000 00000 000 0 000 0 0000 0 0 000 w X U1 H _- x w 01 Om 0) a I al H 1 0 o rn Al 0 M ON Ci Z 1 H W H01 d'01 H a H H 01 N 0) N d' d'd'd' 1 0 al H H H O o1 coH MN MMM NNNNN HHN tntnrr 1.0 £ 01000 CO r t.()to NM O010ao rrrrr 010)0) to U1Hao CO 0)0)10 l0 CO W aDaoao 01 di 01 �lfl rrr (,)01r)(.10) d'd'd' O1DM M tntn010) N 'J NNN H N N d' 0 0 0 0 0 d'W d'd'd' M M M 01 N N M N 00 CO CO CO O 0 O O O d' d'r 01 0) O O O H H H H H H H H r d'd'd• M d'd'd'd' O Z O O O 0 O O O O 0 0 0 to 111 H 1V M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 H H H H d' UI H d' V c0 d'al r H H H H a)CO CO M d'd•w w w H M M M C4 N N N N N N N N 0 N 0 0 N N N N Cr)M M U1 N N N N N M N N N W d' d•d' d'd' d'd'd• M N m N N ddd 'd' ' ' d'd'd' d' d'd'V d' d• d' d'd'd• 0W I ii ii Iii 11111 fit 1 fit 1 1111 1 t iii UI M aOCV 0)H HHH MM d'mc) HHH H NNN 0) HHRH H H Veno U U) r-r- NH d'd'N MHMHH HHH N N N N W HHHH N N LC/tnM A,' N H H H M d'w M M 01 M 01 01 M M M M d'd'd• o M M M M M d' N N W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Up� W FC r0 0 H0 U Wallin!) Cr) W Z U1 co co rn 0 H W W W w WZZ U) WWW W ZZZZ Z > H H H H H W H W W pG U) t HHH H WWWW W a H a as 1-1 El I-1 El 0+0HH I-1 1-11-1 a Www HHHH H w a a as aZ aZ U)HH aaa w 000 ZZZZ Z u) HHH H Cu a Cu a H - a H Pd t Z a a a a H H H HHHH H Z Z Z O u) u)[a W WU] HHWWM cnU)W u) a'L):PG Hx Q w cn ft4 alaw www Z z [� H C9 C9 C7 C7 U)U)U) W H HH H 0 O Z ZZ ZZ [Hq]C7[z'T...� PG ZZZ Z X ZZZZ Z H C9 C7 C7 O H HH HW ZHW 0104ZZZ HHH H >+>)>1 Cr) WWWW W U) ZZZ ,H ,H E-I E-' H X H H E-I E-1 E-i AHC H H H > ZZZZ X u) H H H w WW W0 (y .'� 3S H WWw W HHH Cl D0 0'J 'a 0 HHHH CU H DI AHA a as at01 wa01 w aa4 a a a a HHH £ 01010101 01 x 000 O 00 Ow XOW m3aa3 000 0 000 H WWWW w a oOIII GG as ZZZ 0 0 H H H U U)U) H• Z Z x x C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 W W W HH UU HHHHH HHH 0 U) ww xxxxx 7 C7 CO Z 0000 0 W U)U) HH 0 000 H ZZZZ Z Z H WW 000 (4(4(4'b44 U)Ci]U) Z aaa HHHH H 0 0 HO E ZZ mcnm ��0Cmw Z a aaa z ; as HH HHH 010101001 www a 000 0 HHHH 00 ay'�y000 0101010101 EEE 0 HHHH HHW a 0000 H >+>1 HH WW >1>1>1>1 WWW i 0 4 U) a xxx Z �4 as ZZZZ aaaxx 000 DC i iX H NESE Z X 000 O 33 iZI HHH UU0 H CA CO CA CA 44 [ ERE4 al www wwwww aaa �a aaa a � daw al wwai RI K K K K K K K K K K K K 0)O. Nd'W 111CO1,1 NM01d' 000000 0000 00 0000 11101 0100Cs/O 00 00 d'd'd' Hd'd' NON N1001 MOHU) OU)OU)00 OOU)U) 00 tod'kol0 w0) 0MOr0 U)U1 00 101001 g00 Mr0 MN0 rd'WN 00NONUI HU)d'O HH MUDON 0101 Na)d'0U) d'd' 00 d'd'0 O r r r r U1 N H 01 M 10 N N M V)U)Vr 01 r 10 M 01 0) r r co M M U) 10 10 H 0)d•01 d' H H 0 0 d'd•N XM M w N 01 M V>•m H in-H m in• H H M M V1•H U) HH V>•H H M 00 4fr in-Vr H M Vr V>- a)c0 t/1•to Vs` rac V!V? . . . V} V}V? 413- 4.11-4.1} Vf t?V? V}i? 4//-4/1-VT s s VA i? d'd'CO U1 U) 0 0 H H in-V}V? i? V? H H V)-4/). O H H w CA-41)- x a U w H U) W 11) U1 to U1 U) Ut 111 U) to U1 U1 U)U1 In U)U1 In 11)U1 U1 In U)U)U)to to U1 to U1 In H H H H H H H H H H H HHH H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H C7 4 \ \\ \\ \\\ \\\\\ \\\ \ \\\ \ \\\\ \ \ \\\ W 0 N N N N N N N N NNNNN N N N N N N N N NNNN N N N N N CG H H H H H H H H H HHH H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H -. .-� —� \\\ \\\\\ \\\ \ -.\\ \ \\-\\ - \ • 0 0) 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0101010/0/ 01 0)01 0) 0)01 01 0) 01 01 01 01 01 01 0)0)0) < U W 01 01 01 0)0) 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0)01 0) 0)0)0) 01 01 01 01 01 01 0) 01 0)01 .,. W x 0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0)0) 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0) 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0) 0)01 al M U H H H H H H H H H HHH H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 0 0 ,.) Z 0 H N m d' to to r m 0) 0 H N H W W W W W W W W 10 10 N N N U ".4 CO A CO A CO A 010 A a) A a) A CO A 03 A a) A 03 A c0 A c0 A CO 0 M K M K Cl) K M K M K M K M K Cl) K M K M K M* M K M 10 V W V 10 V 14) V W V W V t0 V W V l0 V W V 10 V 10 V W 0 O 0 to (1) EnnsEI) xxxxx x x x x x x x x x x x xxxxx x x x x x x H 00000 0 000 000 0 0 0 0 00000 000 00 00 0 tr H C4 GO 01 ow 01 a 01 H 1 U 0101010101 A0 01 01 01 01 01 1 N xxaCax H 0 o WW WWW H HHHHH H NNN 01 M N CO CO CIO MCQ 0101 MM M 0 tomaoa)C) to 191010 VLC)l0 N 1 aD XXXXX a001tr 0101 U)lID CO CO CO CO CO CO CO a0 CO CO N N N U) LD N CO W W W W w U)U)o M 1p CO CO CO NNNNN N SNN 000 O N O1 N >>>>> MtrLs) cV0 NN N H 00000 O 000 cr Vl tr 01 VI CO 0 00000 1`r-1 V'sTI HCs1 00 0 H 00000 0 000 HHH OD CA 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 N 0 O H M M M M M H H U)UI H H H Ln H Ifs M .-1 r-I.-i H H H H H H H N VI H g M N NN N N N N M M M M M N VI N in M M M M M N N N N N N N co ra W VI VI tr VI tr tr d1 V V/ VI V er VI tr VI ell tr tr VI V/tr N N N tr VI V w VI 0 CQ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 I I 1 1 1 0I VIr1trNH H r1Htr HHH H M H N Hl0r-1Ulri 000 Htr NH H U�7N N a0 CO CO H VI U)U11.0 r-1 H ',Tr l0 tr lip 1.0N U1 l0 O) VI•4.VI H U) H H M 4 MMHHH M trI-I- l0trtr tr M tr l0 Hl0lpl0H aOa0a0 MN MM m 00000 0 000 1p 00 O O 0 1p O 1.0 1p l00 01 01 01 00 00 0 CO H cn WWW WWWWW CU W C0 000 00000 WWW Hz U Z CO UnZZ HHH HHHHH co U) a'FC H H H Hxx aaa M1xMMM HH 0Erl M H s-i amen www wwwww >4>4>I ss aH w }ai 00000 a aaa CCCO COCCCOC 4KC4 as Z CO C14 CU CIT C14 au La H M HHHHH 0 0CQW Eco� gIgg 41 moo 0, zzz co CO z zzzzz C�7�C�7 oo �� CO z W C7 UI\- 000 H H W 00000 C00 CxiE-1 0 0 C0C0C0U' C9 Z ZC7C) HHH X HHHHH ZZZZZ H HZZ CO CO CO co W to co UfCoco HH CLT Z CO HHHHH H H1�H�-1H COU)U) > COCOUfU]CO 000 HH E CO 014004 lx ZZ. Cx,ICxiaa, 0 H U lx Cx.Cx MEx.ICx. • • • g g OH W 00000 HHHHH Cr) WHH 000 C>: Z C4 a 00000 000 WW E- 0 a talalall 0 0aa aaa X a Z Z as a as U0U 00 Xw a 0 Z HHHHH 0 0 0 0 Crr Ri M M L4 N N N a 0 0 H x xxx x NNN UUU O Z Z H El 00000 zzz 0 Cl) x ZZZZZ 22 M E-IElE-I HHH 1=C CO a wwwww K4 KC y1 H AAA zzz 0 a CO ��a cncncn w �aa�aa�.a� www W HHH 4 Z CO 0 00000 ZZ HH H 00000 aaa HHH H 0 U 000 U)til UUUUU 0 000 U)COCO CO x IxT QST•21t8 xxx O O O W W W z a H H D+>+�+y+� zz CC!) xxxxx 000 HHH ccocUnwmaoi CO cococo • • • CX � 00000H Cr]Ill Z HH MM 0 X al al cx7 R.R.� CO COHn Ix H 4 R�RCI1GZ Cis-I]IGya-I i CA PI 0O HHH ZHHH f] I, 17 .'� :r+.�4S1A4P PPP ."!.X * * * * * * * * * 91 * * * 01 N NN Vl 1p l0 SD 0000 0 N0 N 1010 00 -1010 U)U) N M ao OO U) 0000 01 co N N 0 N OO HNto(NI Nl0 co a0 OU)U)O 10M10U) HH 00 NN HH V101N00H 0000 NH0) 00N a% trtr n111 N CO 0)0 L) H H U)N N 0 M tr U1 M 0)01 0 0 01 01 0 0 VI l0 a0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N U)M N M O sI)SO 0 N N i/}H r-1 N VI VI M M to-n co H'til VI 0)O) U)U) M Cr) 00 0o (NI 01 r-VI 01 co U)U)U1 in N N O ri u)co VI VI 1£� in-trr H H d1 r-1 H L1-L} L? t?N 41'M H H tr tM tr tp H H 01 01 ri N L)•d1 tr d1 d1 M H L}N L}VJ•i? U)1p 41)-i/}V} i/}i/} i/} i/} i/)i/} i/}i/} i/}t/} .i/?i/}i/} i/}t/}i? . i/} t/} XU)U) 1p a) H MM i/}i/} i/} i/} i/} i?L} U W M M 0 w H CO W U)U)U)U)to U1 U1 U)Ln U)U1 UI U1 U) U) U) U)If)to in U1 U1 N cc) U1 IA LOU) LI) H H HHHHH H Ti riH HHH H H H H HHHHH HHr-I HH HH H C7 4 \\\\ . \ \\\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ \\\ \\ \\ \ W 0 N NNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N NNN N N N N N N N N . N C4 riHHHH H HHH HH r1 H H H H HHHHH HHH HH HH H \\\\\ \ \\\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ \\\ \\ \\ \ 0 01 0)01 0)0) 0) 0)01 0) 01 0)0) 01 0) 0) 0) 0)01 01 01 01 01 01 0) 01 01 01 01 01 0 W 01 01 CA 01 01 0) 0)01 0) 0)0)0) co 0) Ol 0) 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0) 01 W x 01 01 01 01 OA 01 0)01 01 ON 01 ON 01 01 co 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0) 01 0 0 HH,-IHH H HHH H HH H H T-1 H HHRH r-1 H HH HH HH H 0 a Z N m tr U) to N co al O H N M VI H N N N N N N N .N a0 co co co a) 0 a) A a0 A a0 A co A CO A CO A a0 A a0 A a0 A a0 A a0 A a0 A a0 A U Mal * M* m * m * M* M* M* M* M * M * M * M is M 0 l0 V l0 V l0 V l0 V l0 V l0 V l0 V 1p V TD V l0 V 1p V 1..0 V l0 V U U N a 'V rn La a H Z 00 00 0 0 000000000 0 00 0 0 000 000000 0 r z LI) H -- a w 01 0w 01 aI rn H 1 U 01 01 Cr) 0 m01 Q z - - tO Cil C4 04 H U w w M 01 H V' PO W 01 01 01 01 01 01 O1 CA 01 Lc) LO 0 V' t0 10 W N N Ul Ul Ul til O 10 X X N V 010101 CA 0101010101 V) NCD 10 a0 Lot0 10 1000000000 't,) ,,r1 r1 H el N CD CD CD CD CD C3 CD HHHHHHHI H CO N 0 10 001 CV 0 00 h CO CO 03 l,l�l� OD OD OD OD 03 OD t,l,lsI's l�N t0 H 0H 00 H N 00 Oy 000 aa4 00 NN N O 000 000000 N O H z Z H N 'Qi Qi'Qi N�F4 0 0 O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O Cl 0 0 0 H H H H H H O H HH COM M Ul HHHHHHHHH al LI)Ln V' Cl M01H NNNNNN H V'V' Za MM Cl 'VN N V'V'V'wwNCMCM Cl NN N N1MN MMMMMM N w V'V' V'M V' d' V'V'd'V'V• V'd'd' V' V'd' d' V' V'V' V'V'V'V'd'd' V' O W i i I l I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 0I HH NN '.0 H NMtOHNV'HODCV H HH V H UILI)H HHHHHH H U NN V'V' N V' UI UIUINNU)UINN H V'V Ln Cl LI)LI)U) HCONNNLC/ H Q, tO t0 H H t0 d' H H H H H L.H H H W V'V' t` Cl C`C`N M H H V'H l- Cl 00 00 0 0 000000000 0 00 0 0 000 000000 0 z z H H Z z H H CO CO cn CO ww ww g U Z H H UI H H \ w",..4.41 U1 O 9> WDD a z Uaw w H P4 P4 Hf:4P4 0 w 'Z.,OH H H 41 a) w awes O E4 4100 0 C4 U1 u? U H aCncn x z Hxa a H H CO Z a 0 H CO 0 a a vQQ aw H w cxn�� ww ai�ai Cl) Cl) zz &I CO Z w o)En rAw W 00 co EL. H C70O U HH 'JUC9 wwwwww t A HH C7 Z H H Z 11-4 z U1'Z.Z ZZZZZZ Z CO CO 'J+H Z CnU3UlUlU)U)HU)U1 w w �wH 000000 H al 0 H U E4E4E4E4EzQEz�'EQz+ G4 04 w UU H U1 �1Z 0.4 wwwwww g PO4a E+ COFA CO ICO 1I)O C4 O WW 0 ) C40a wwwwww a as H w Z P4 P4 lx P4 04 aoaa U Z CO Q HUO HHHHHH 0 Cn H H U > Z 'Ii: P4 P4 H CO A CO ril U)Cwn x a H E4 H H En 000000 q U z a .4 z UU U]U] H U) 4 AA w iii ZZZZZZ fl' '> H H CO a 0 M W Z H H H H H H 0 HH CO o coz��z� ' UU 33 w w zz CO '717'] 000000 co g44 a W al al .4.4.4 000000 H Om a s a v1 U1 Ul U1 W co co U1 03 rC O 4H H H x Fe '44 Z H 0000000000 Cla 0101 01 raCCI HHHHHH C.) y 4 .4a a a 00.4.1.1.4.1.1.1 a z * * * * * * * * * * * * NO N O LI)LI) UI UI NN U100000 Cl 000) 00 'q'N l0 00 00 N O H Cl N N N N N'.010 00 H7, , V'O V' tOL�OD V'V' MM MCD000001000 00 HHN 00 00 HO.4.un Mo0000d' MM .7 NON NOiN V'V' 0101 VI UD C`Li)C`CHOU)LI) 0101 UlHt0 0000 Ultra NU)000 tOl0 1.0 1/40 1/40 OD CD MM 0 r-01t0 HCON Nr HH N V'O V'V'OONt0Mt- NN CN u)V' HH HH UIMMC1 tOLT >4l)-CfHO NN VD Ul N CO CO t0 HH HH MN MO NNCel t0 Ll•V ClN H40-N NN i/f Lf V'VI-Ht0 H 41>N 40-40- . .4.0- . i/f CO- Lf 4/)- .in-CO- .VI-Lf CO- s s i/f i/f CO- CO- Lf CA- i/f in-CO- Cl)- 4.0- VI C4 1.11) fMNID H I O H N N CO .'�. 40-40-VI- N N C/f CO- 4.0- VI- C) /fU Vf (II- U.1 fW GL 0 ' CO H Cl) CO Ul tI) l.0 Ln Ill LI) un II)LI)un Ln U)U)LI)LI) Ln LI)LI) LI) Ln Ln LO LI) UI U)Ln Ln LI)Ln LI) H El H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H O Q \\ \\ \ \ \\\\\\\\\ \ \\ \ \ \\\ \\\\\\ w Q N N N N N N N N N N N Cl N N N N N N N N N N N NNNNNN N a H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H • U 0101 0101 01 O1 CA 01 CA CA 0101010/O1 01 0101 01 01 01 01 01 010101010101 01 U CO 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 Ol 01 Ol 01 T 01 01 O1 Ol 01 01 01 01 01 CA 01 • wx 0101 01 01 in 01 01010101 T 01 CA Ch CA CA 0101 01 01 010101 010101010101 01 Z U H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H U 0 a z LI) l0 N CO 01 0 H N CO d' in t0 H 00 00 OD CO co 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 O 00 A CO A 00 A CD A 00 A CO A CO A cot'. 00A O A CO A CO A Z 0 Cl * Cl * M* M* Cl * M* Cl * Cl')' M* Cl * M * Cl')' 1.0O V 1.0 V l0 V t0 V t0 V t0 V t0 V tO V l0 V lO V t0 V 1.I) V 0 U U co a) rn 0 C4 M x MMM x MM x x x x x MMM x MMM x x x H 0 0 000 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 000 0 0 0 V J H W m oco m ai m H U A 0z w W H U H 40 N aD aD aD m m t0 o N H N M 0 M M m m m O M a0 d' to m N V VN op V4 W d' d' aD co coco ao H a0 a0 co N.44 M N a0 U1 U)H 00 ap t0 a0 co W N Nt` H NN N .44alN N OOH N Nd�d� N N I- H 0 O 000 m O O O V H H V U)U)U) O H 0)0) O 0 O O O 000 H 00 O H N H H H H H 0 H V V O O O m U) 000 O O O O O aD O O 000 O 000 O O O E m c- m v H er mop H H )- H H H H M M HHH H H H Zi P. V' H N N N N MM M N d4 N N N N V M N N N N M N 0W er N V V V V' .41.t. er N M V, N VVer V' V'V' d' d4 st' 000 ) i i i i ) I ) ) I I ) I i I i ) I i i 1 1 ) U E H N HHH U) N N H 0 0 H O H VI H M er M V H H H U N H V N V N NN M V U) H Til H U)H N U)N U) H H 4 m m V+M er to VV H CO CO M aD H N H H N N N V M M O O 000 O O O O 0) N O 0) 000 O 000 O O O 0 U U Wcn w W W z W U? H a U, a U)w O W U)U)cn cn H U) 0 a zW Z a w 41410 U www w > w H (Y1 WH W 0 U] H i H H W Z HHH H a H H 4 Pa P WW w >4 w a >4 000 w aaa a W a a >4 Za Z UU cn 4 H a 4 aaU) H aaa a U) a H RI,' H04 H HH 04 H a a 040H U) 0004 04 04 )x a P> H 00Z H U w w WW w > U) w MM U) U U)U) cn w cn U) U) w W z C7 H 0 Q M z W W HHO H U]U) 0 E 0 00W 0 000 0 0 0 Q '.7 Irli Z H U Z 'Z.Z E U) ZZ'Z. Z H Z A W >1>1 Cl) .�i i H HH4 \ HHH H U) H ZH Z HE U) U P U HEz 0 HHH 194 C11ggg ,Ei U) H ZW H P cxi HH 0 0 0 cCA 4 0 WWM• w 0 w A ZWO W PP,000 a U 2 0 U 00A � 000 0 a 0 U Z U, a N a U CO cn 04 al D w o w Q Q A Ma W q In x Z U) a iii HHH 0 a 0 g z w w 0 H m z 04 Wai U) O UU U)U)cn Q H >4 M 333 H aa W W W W HEP U m Z W arx H W 444 HHH 3 H .7 ai H � E 0 0 0 O 04 04 Cy U P aaa U) Z H Z > M WNW AAA Q W E w MMM H z H w 000 rx 707070 0cn x 000cn P 000 H ZZ 0 0 PPP H 0404 a 04 ril a aaa a aaa a a a * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * O O O 0 01 t0 aD M N N op cr N co co O O 0 0. 0)0) O O er 01 M t0 M M O 0 U1 U) H H CM 01 0)0) EA 0 O O O U)H N U) 040 CO O 01 0 0)0) O O 0 O Cl H O O N N Um U) ) 0)0) H t0 t0 OD CO t0 t0 01 0) O O N N t0 M co co N N N H m N N O O OD OD N N O O N 0)H CO N N 0)O 0)0) OD OD VI.cf. 03 OD M M 0 N N M M 00 tD ll) O M t00 CO CO t0 N aD cn CM U)U) MM HH U)U) co-co-Lnl0 MM V'N N 0) to l0 CO OD MM U)V}t?l0 40-CAM V}V- cr er (?V? in-M-. V4 V4 CAM. L I). i?i/ /)M HH 0 V}V- LO L} . . L? L! 2/1-M- 4.0-411- 4.0.40- L}L} 4.0-M HH U W 0 I:4 U W H U) W U) U) m U)U) U) U)U) to. U) U) U) U) M M U) U) U)U)U) U) U) U) H El H H HHH H HH H H H H H HHH H HHH H H H 0 A,' \ \ \\\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \\\ \ \ \ W A N N NNN N NN N N N N N NNN N NNN N N N 04 H H HHH H HH H H H H H HHH H HHH H H ' H b4 U an 0) MMM 0) 0101 0) 01 01 01 01 010)0) 01 01010) 0) 01 m U W 0) 01 0)0)01 m mm m 0) 0) m m maim m mmm 0) m m w w m m mmm m mm m m m m m mmm m ' mmm m m m U U H H HHH H HH H H H H H HHH H HHH H H H 0 H Z N CO 01 N m m 0 H N M VN U). t0 N CO m O H N Q. 0 o 0 o O o O O 0 H H H aD A ao A CO A 01A 01 A 0) A 0) A 0) A CAA 0) A m A 0) A m A 0) A 0 A 0) A 0 en lM0 V tM0 V '00 V lM0 V '00 V lM0 V tM0 V W�/ tM0 V lM0 V '00 V W en V 110 V W V eel v en W V 0 U CA a) CTI RI a X x x x X x x x X x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x H 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 00000000000000000 0 w in H • x w CA ow al ai al H A zz H U H U1 00 d' 01 0 0 in co HH 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 O N 00 d' co 01 01 M d' l0 01 01 l0 l0 l0 l0 10 10 l0 l0 10 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 10 10 U) N M OD a0 a0 co co co CO aD CO a) O a0 a0 OD CO CO CO a0 a0 CO a0 CO OD OD a0 CO CO a0 a0 0 l- l� N (-l- l0 NN [�N HN[-l-l-l-l-l-N N N l-l-l-l-l-l-N l� H 01 O O O O O O O O O O H 00000000000000000 l0 01 O O O O 0 H O O O O ri 00000000000000000 M O O 0 l0 O O 0 0 0 O O U1 NCI 000000000000000 0 01 M H H d'W H ri U) U1 V' H N N a0 00 OD 0D OD OD OD O O a0 OD OD 0 CO CO I-I x M 111 N M NN Tr N M NN N 000101MM0101010101P101M010101 M Wd' d' V' d' d'Cr V' d' M W d' d' N N d'd'd't'cr d'd'd'd'd'V'V'd'd'd' W OW i , i I I II I I o ii I I 1111111111 111111 U H O ri H HH H H ri HN d' MMHNririd'ririNNd'aoONMd' ri O N N M NO In H H H ci'ri N HHN N N NCV U) H OD OD UI U)U) el 4 H l0 d' H M M M M 0 W M d' 01 01 ri ri M M M M V'V'1/40 l0 l0 l0 1,1,l" M 0 l0 O O O O O O 01 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Z H z • H ww w CO H UV U U H H O H W W H W W a H 0 0 HH 0 x H WWWWWWWWWWWWWWW W CU x a zz a H z m 000000000000000 Ul • H U a a w H H H H H H H H FA FA H H H H H H U)IX CO aaaaaaaaaHaaaaaaoca) Cl) w U] w Z w to z;wwwwwwwwwEll wwwwww Z W U W C) W HH C) A HH W HU]U]U]U]U]U]U]U]WU]U]U]U]U]U] 0 A z Z z 4.. Z Z H z OW H W W H W W CO H 4 Z W FC C)X 4 4>4 4>4>4>4>4>4>4 4>4>4>4>4 U) IX 9 H H(7 X H HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH 0 HP4 a (24 IX x 0 HH H g F vH 00 Z a W ,.a 0 0 Z W xC x x El HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH 0 OO H 0 W W W x 0 U] Z W g 3 3 000000000000000 a Z En EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE C.) v 4 00000000000000000 • H H W 00000000000000000 w w v aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa W 0] x H Z HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH H Z x W a U U H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 P: H co 0 0 ww >+ a HH a 00000000000000000 C7 O U 0 0 H H U] PG WH H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H Z '� H 0U ww w a 00 › aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa H rr�� POWWWWPOWPOWWWWWWWWW W U] U] W xx x H 00 u: 0000 D00000DD0 D 0 0 0 0 > x1 lx) w x mu] El CO w P4 04 (7 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa H 04 El x 0 00 0 w w ww w wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww w Z v v U v w w ww w wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww w w a s as a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a x H HH H 0 0 00 O 00000000000000000 0 UCi x• ti) 0) Cl) cnv] v] v] a) DO CO v] v]CO CO v]wri)v]0)v]U)cncnU)mv]0)v] cn # * * K # K K K * K # # 00 l-h 0000 00 000 0O 00 00 00101 NN 00000 M 0 OD 01UIM 01 l0 03 l0 d'U1 Ml- MM H 0 0 01 01 01 01 0 0 cr U)01 OD CO 0 0 0 0 U1 M 00 U1 U) O O ri N N M M U1 CO ri 011 M N CO l0 N V' sr V' R00 T)'cr d'cr CA CA U1l-N el rl UIUI SN 01001 MM 01 CD NNU101 yr CI OD V)Tr -01fr1 d'd'ri U1 OD OD O 00 U)in NN M M U1N OD ri ri ri ri 0101 riNM 1010 r11,01U1 M el M M O 001 ri 01 sr CO-CA aD 0 U)1.0 VD l0 N N ri ri V}4/} d'O cr d'd' 4/1.4/1- M M U1 M co Ul U1 a0 H O M M M aO CA•aO M 4n-v)-41)-(4)- d'OD L 4/f Lf i?i/} i/?4/)- i? . i/?4/)41} i/?i? .i?4/1-40?L! 41)- d'Cr ri H N N 0)01 H 01 H H M H H .^!. 01 01 L}i/} i?i/)• 111 111 111 i/}t? i/? ifr i?l"-- U �U i/}i/} i/}4} i? 4/f W X X U CA El Cl) W U1 in U1 U) LOU) U) U1 N U)U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U)1.11 U1 U1 U)U1 U1 U)U1 U1 U1 U1 U) H El H H H H H H H H H H H H rl ri H rl H H rl rl rl ri ri ri ri ri ri ri ri ri (7 x4 \ S. \ \ S_ \ S \ S \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ W 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N x ri H H H H ri ri ri ri ri ri H ri ri rl ri ri ri ri ri ri ri H H ri H ri ri ri ri X � .„ �� ,,�,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,�........�S5 D4 0 01 01 01 01 0)01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 U W 01 rn 0) 0) 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0) 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0) W x 01 01 01 01 0)0) (31 0) 0) 0)0) 0) 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 Z 0 H ri ri ri ri H ri ri ri ri ri ri H H ri ri ri ri ri ri ri ri H H H ri rI ri ri ' ri U . 0 a Z m Cr In l0 N CO 01 0 H N d' U) H H ri H H H H H N N N N N U ^.L 01 A 01A 01A CNA 01 A 0) A 01 A 0) A 0) A '01 A 0) A 01 A Z0 MK MK M* MK M K m* m* mi. M # m* M V V V V V V V V V i' M i' O rzl Wl0 l0 lD l0 V l0 l0 l0 10 l0 WV l0 V O 0 0 H a) b1 a. 0 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 00 O 000000000000 H d' X N H a — al 0 p 01 aZ rn rn H I rn 01 U 0 01 01 W Z . . A VD 0 w 41 c4 w r' H H 0 03 al H H N tO lO N a) Li1 MM N0) 01 000000000000 0s X X to r- VdU1 N b ' ' d'd' O N N a)O d' U1 N U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U11f1 U1 Ul a0 W W to a)a) a) a)a) O a0 a) to a0 a) N a) a) a0 a0 a0 a0 aD a0 aD 00 a)a0 aD CO t� UU d' NN t`N N r-r- .--1NN d's' t.NNt-NNNNt.NNN H 0 al W co 00 O 00 d' 00 d' 00 0)01 O 000000000000 o AA d' 00 0 00 H 00 H o0 0)0) 0 000000000000 11) HO O 00 O 00 M 00 0 N0 00 0 HrlHHHHH--HH H - HH H M O M H HH U1 HTr N HH H N M HN H N01NN 010101010401 NN za d' H cr N M N M N N O N N N N M N M N M M M M M M M M M M M M P W yr Tr 14 Tr Tr cr w w d' N w 4' Tr sr Tr Tr Tr w w Tr W Tr Tr Tr w Tr cr Tr Tr Tr 0W II I I II I I I I II I II I I I IIIiiilItiiiO U1 C)I H LH HH H HH M MW H NH HH M HHHHHHHHHHNM U N NN T' HH MH H H Ln III H HH NM U) a)MHNNH MU1o1 Nao U1 �i H co co ti' Md' H MM 0) NN M MM WI ts HriririHerCririsrHN 0 0)01 O O O 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 Mcn U zW� co U Z a 0 W H U) Z m U)U) Co x W U)Z U1 0 GO a W 9W H WZ WW W al C.) WH W H '.7 WH py'H x H W H H H 0Z H H H a U a 111 1-4 co aE as a .4 al am a a \ co a cna H az as a H au a H U) H w w a WH Pi au w L.Su) au.1 a I Z 0X A c2 CO D M 00 0 H Aai '.7 U) HH a A Z a Ul w coco co a al co a co W H W 0 O C9 \ C7 H H C7 C7 C7W.'7 C7\ C7 W W W W W W W W W W W W A O EE Z HZ CO ZZ W ZZ z O E`'U) Zz zzzzzZzzzzzz H Fi H WH Z HW Z HH H \ HZ H 000000000000 M Z H CAE H HX EE E a H04 alHH E ]Cxx�CxdC]C]Cx�CxAC coau Cw au C4 CU fai au au C4 au au au WH l w3 Z �H W �� 0 > rH 3 WWWWWWWWWWWW A 0U) W OW H WA H WW W Ei WH W aaaaaaaaaaaa CA 3A 0 a0 a Ow 3 00 0 XE-� Oa 0 HHHEW-+EWHHHHHHH UU U0 ZZ as H H a a 0 00 Z 44 U En In al 4#4 H H H H Z 00 0 00 10 al ali c4 04 HH HH �� ,`� H H 0 W >+>+ E E A 1 1 I-i 0 0UI CA cti 1.4 H El 0 00PI fil al au as xx 0 000000000000 '› D 0 as H cora U I a ww as co 000000000000 W WW AA M >t>t W W WW 3� 4 HEHHHHHEEHEH W W W Z W QFC x I-1 t-3 C7 C7 C7 CAU)U)CACAUICACACACAU]CA 0 00 O1 ) qq W ,.aa H ZZ' 333333333333 M cu 3 Ell'z 0 as H HH al H 41 113 4 i Wx�W x cACACACACACnCACAcnCACACn CO CU) CO CAU) CO CO CO CO U)U) U) EE EE E 000000000000 * * * * * * * * * * * * 00 01001 NN tO M 01 UI U1 N U1 N 00 t0 N 00 Into N0N O tO tO MM 00001 O N 0 d'00101("1 E' 00 000 00 tOOtO NN 0100 r1 00 01MN VD V3 NertO 01 MN Tr d' 0001 001-O0101 Tr co HnH Rtoto M oe rHH l0 CD tO MM COU1 cr NN 00 N ri Hri d'NH ONaCl LOU) tO NN 1n 01 riNH I-M 01N 0 NN 01 t0 U1 00 U1 N N tO tO L}rH 0101 tr in O 0101 HV}N N M U) 00 Oto H CO CO H 01 N ri m a00 4/1-00- N V}M N N N L}N N N Vf H rI V?N M H H Lf L? H H N H H H Lf Lf in-VI-N V?V1`L?N VT H L}L? L! L} . . V>•L} 4/1-L} i?V). V).L).t/} V}V? t/!. L? t? Lf V' d' HH Uin- L1- Lf L} W M l U W H U) W U1 N U1 111 U1 U1 U1 N U1 Lo U)U) U1 to 111 U1 U1 - U1 U1 N U)U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 H H H HH ri HH H HH ri HH ri HH HH ri riHHHHHHHHHHH 0 4 \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\ W A N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 01 N N N N N N M H H H H H H H H H ri H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\ U 0) 0)01 01 01 01 01 a1 0) 01 0)01 0) 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0)01 01 01 01 01 0)01 01 0) U W 0) 01 01 01 01 01 T 01 0) 0) CI ON 01 01 01 01 01 cn 01 0)01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 W pC Ch m0) 01 0101 01 at at 01 0101 01 0101 0101 Ch 0/010/01 O1 CA 0)01.010)m0) U U H H H H H H rH H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 0 a Z t0 N CO 01 O H N m d' to t0 N 01 H N N N N M M M M M M M M m U x 01 A 0) A CAA 01 A 01A 01 A 01 A 01 A 01 A 01 A 01 A CAA 01 U M* m * M* m * M* m * M* M * M* M * m * M* M 0 Ell t0 V 10 V tO V t11:11/o V t0 V tO V to V t0 V t0 V 10 V 191/ t0 0 U H H a1 01 CIS P4 xxxxx iX M x x M xxx x x x xxxxxxx x a a a 00000 000 0 00 000 0 0 0 0000000 0 H H H ri sr U) H 1:4 -- w OW rn a on rn H I M z I W al rn rn t0 U 01rn01 0 H H 0 0 0 0 0 v'v'v' H . . . Lfl N N 1..0 lfl 1.0 VD I.0 N H 0 LflLI)t!)LC)U1 NNN N CO H S N NNNNNNN O N CO CO 000000 CO OD co O a010 CO a0 v' U)UD00 aD O a0 a0 CO rf M CA NNNNN NNN N l0N U>E N N H NNNNNNN O VD v' H H 00000 000 0 sr v' N00 0 0 0 0000000 U) 0 H CA 00000 000 0 v'v' 0 Z 0 0 0 ri 0000000 N O H H H H H H H .-i H H 0 00 000 o in 0 0000000 o H O 0 E NNNNN NNN N HH CO a0 CO M H H 01HHr-IHriri H N H d' ZRS MMMMM M M M M MM M M M M N M N N N N N N N N M N l0 .7 W v'w v'v'v' v'v'v' v' Tr v' v'v w v' v' v' v'v'v w v'v'v' v' v' v' ri 001 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 0 " v'r1rH''H HNH H HrH MMM H N H HHHNH01H H In Ul O U UIHNNLI) LI)NH H MM v'Til w M N N NNHNMNH v' N N OD 4 r-MMM I- riHM M HrI ri ri r1 M v' H M0101\00/'.O[. v' CO CO N 00000 0 0 0 O O 0 O o 0 O o O 0000000 0 01 al " 01 mm m M w 'Zr HH W H mmmCUU) CO U) 0 > U > WWWWWW W W H 1:4 1:4 Z 1: HHHHHH H H E-1 ww www w w 000000 a 0 a mm 0 0 U E U) Eaaaaaa a a H HHH CO Zaaaaaa a a U Z Z W W W U Z 3 w will www www 00 mmm 0 U) 0 C7C7C7C7C)C7 C7 w 0 E 0H Z 00000 000 W mm >�>1 \ � U) ZHHHHHH H 00 H Z xxxxx xxx 0 mm EEE 0 H U) HEEr�Er�EEE E x E Z as a as 0aa 4 ww HHH w Cl w 034:1:333 g W 3 H wwwww www E wc�. 000 e> w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 H H H 3 E 0 H w w w w w w W 0-7 W 0 wwwww www 0 4:x EEE 1d 0aaaaaa a w a a EEEEE EEE a as 000 E 3 a /0000000 0 E 0 w M w m Cl: mm0) W m El 0 0 0 El 0U7. 3 x 0000i 0 00 0 U 0000000 0 E ZZ W m Z U000000 0 z W fHGHl E 's H 3333333 F W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E W W W U qqqqqq q 00 El D 00000 UUU El KC W 0 xxxxxxx H EEEEE EEE m mm 0 U U .1 0 m mmmmmmm 0 m07mmm mmm ZZZ a 4 0000000 E � W WWWWW WWW 0 >'>' HHH W mmmmmmm C7 P 33333 333 W W W x x mmmmmmCil m x H EL 0 -1 z ,0, Pi al(Di 000p;00py0p;0 DG 0 >1 CO M 00000 000 0 33 a>> 3 N 3 >4>I>1 N 4 0 0 i, i' i. # K # K K i. K K i. K U1100 O1 N N M l0 VD un 00 NON d•U)M N NN 0101 00 l0 a'M M O co N lO V'v' riH O1 O) CO OD ElCA CO PI l0 ri 141 r)ri v'N 00 U)N N N H M N Ul LI) M M O0 U1 M rI UlN N M co co up U1 U) C-r- 0000 co v'N co OD N 01 N U)l0 MM N al un to on N H CO OD 00 00 01 O ri N N a0 l0 M IO to MM MM 1010 C) d'v'N O l-UI U) O v'M OD l0 l0 H N d' H U)M H N N co co M M 01 un U)� � l0 in-rI v'v' M M r1 rI UI UI N ri H M-lD ri N LM M M M u)f l co 0 co co LALA l- M M v'v' v)-v)-co- M- N H H tf}4/4- (1 t? M M i?4/1-C/}L} t?C? LA i/A in- i/A i?i? CO-Cl)- CO-CO- C/A LA 44- N 510100 U CO- CO-C/A VA Cl)- 01 C//)- oFW M Cl 0 w E m W U)In U1 to Ul U1 In N U) Ln Li) LC)U)U) U) Ut UI Lf1 Lin U)in U)In Ln Ln l0 l0 l0 H E HHHHH HHrAH HH HHH H H H riHHHHHri ri ri ,-1ri C7 4 \\\\\ \\\ \ \\ \\\ \ \ \ \\\\\\\ --, \ \ \ W A N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 1:4 H rI H H H H H H H H H H r)rI ri H ri 1-1 H H H 1-1 rI rl H 1-1 H H g 0 01 01 01 O1 01 01 01 O1 O1 O1 01 01 O1 01 Co 01 O1 01 01 O1 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 W 01 01 Ol 01 01 01 01 O1 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 O1 O1 0101010101011,1 01 01 01 01 W x 0101010101 01 01 O1 Ol 01 01 O1 01 01 01 01 O1 01 01 01 01 01 01 O1 01 01 01 01 U U rI H ri H H H H rI H H H H H rI r1 H H H ri H rI H H H H H H H 0 0 Z 01 o H N M v' Ul l0 N OD 01 O H H M v' v' v' v' v' v' v' at v' v' Ill U1 0 �i rti01 A ON A O1 A 01 A O1 A 01A 01A 01A 01 A 01 A 01 A 01 A CA A 0 m i. M i. M K M K M i. M i. M i. M* M M M i. M i. Cr)i. 0 lD V l0 V l0 V l0 V l0 V l0 V l0 V \D V l0 V l0 V l0 V l0 V l0 V O U 04 H rn rts 04 0i 1:4 P4 P4 P4 asaaaaCUCuP4P4P4 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H cr z N H a -- w OW Ci a Ci Ci H C.) Z A i W CiCi CD U Ci Ci H H \\ m d' U1 t-- t0 VD t0 1/40 t0 tO t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 0 to Lo O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 r-Ir-1 HH H H ri riHH rHHHH r1HH \\ tO tO t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 tO t0 t0 ID t0 CO t0 H N N 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ri H O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 N H O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H MM d' N N N 00000CO 00 00 OO 00 CO000 a I'Tr t0 N M M MMi")MMMMMMMM 14 cr d' H d' V' d' Ai V'd'd'd'd'd'cN d'cr d' O PO i i i I I I I I I I I I I' I I_ I. I. U N d' 0 to U1 Hcr O CO ri F r{ri H N d'ri M U d'd' CO N N M N M N H N:tO N CO OD en Ln a'i d'cr N 00 0 H Mt0t0McrH01HrH000, 01 at 01 O l 01 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 O O W�L7 0 U z a a E4 C0 a WDWWWw4WWWw Cg UUUUUUUUUUU H H H H H H H H H H H aaaaaaaaaaa wwwwwwwwwww w HH U)UWWUWVU)V)U)WA z A z • Ft4 w w O w >4y+>4>4>4>4>4yi>4>4y4 zz X x U HHHHHHEAEAEAEA H 0 ED P4 a a Ft HHHHHHHHHHH HH H 0 W H .1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 U)U) 0 H a U) HHHHHHHHHHH AA W 0 H °P4 H�"H„�M'.H�Pa'.H�".HPPHa 0 a Z a w H U) • 00 0 0 UUUUUUU.UUUU Cs� zzzzzzzzzzz • W H HHHHHHHHHHH M HH 0 4Zzzzzzzzwzwzzz�Wz7 0 HH H W Cl) ZZXXXZ££zE£ Z AA Z a w wwwwwwal-al www DI H 0 H 00000 ED0EDEDEDt P .1a cn Ft 1111111111 �xx El4 H A1 0)c) x A z W WWWWWWWWWWW qqAq H W H H HHHHHHHHHHH HH z al CC4 C4 I) Cl)aFA cn 33CO 3353M3333 NON OO ri rI CO CO OO CV r-0%01 t0 1/40 N OOti,,CPO1 ri to Otn 00 M M NN 00 O1 is is t's Ul 0101 M to 0 COtn N Hd'tn 00 00 0101 mm r-(.4 cN 0N0) HONN is 00 0 b to N t�t- LA IN N N m m In in d't-N(sun O N co r-H 01 T-1 01 r-1 d'er i'V' cr d' V}i/} 4/ Vf N i/}N L}L}H in-t/}H r♦ 00 .it} . . . i/}V} 4/H0- t? i? - in- i? . M e' In N H m 0 V} in- cil-vMr N W Ci M M 0 M H U) W t0 1/40 1/40 1/40 1/40 1/40 CD t0 t0 tO tO t0 t0 CO tO t0 t0 Fi EI c7 4 \\ H H H H \\\\\\\\\\\ W AN N N N N N Ni`iNNNNNNNNN a H ri H H H H ri ri ri ri H H H ri H ri H \\ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\ X U in 01 01 01 a% O 1 01 01 CA 01 01 CA 01 01 CA 01 Ci - U W m Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci CA W W O1 01 01 0i 01 Ot cn 01 01 CA O1 01 C.CA 01 01 01 UU H H H H H H ri ri H H ri ri ri H H ri H 0 a Z N m i' u1 ID N H to In to to I . Lc') in 0 ?4 CA A CA A 01 A CA A O1 A 01 A U m * M. M* M* M 4' In ie O tO V t0 V lO V t0 V l0 V 1/40 V 0 U H (1) rn RS a N W U) H 01 01 01 H U w k H • i< U) N lO U) U) CO N 0 N N 0 N M CO tO 0 H tD U) N a) H al U) 0 V 0 VI N t0 a) U) 0 N m al CO V' O tD H V' ri Ol CO d' N H O O CO U) CO V H a) al N U1 U1 N N Ol U) 0 N U) 01 V CO H H H 01 H O1 cr H CO Ul 1.0 H H 0 a) i? in- 5 i? 5 in- CO H M U) CO UD N H H O O1 V CO Cl V' H i/} N M i? U) H a1 i? i? N N VI- H co- H N L} i? al w ii fx W HO H Z44 Ei El 1.4 H w Z Z U H w a a a w w 3 a > w a H Cl CO > hl w w ad >1 G4 w H H O'. Ot 0 Ul W 0 rEl i H PC RS Ol H H H H 4 Z El W 7Z H w A A H a0 Ol H a W X a Z IX Itq 0 4 01 H H f4 (A � l "W El '3 CO .. U O H w a U 1-1 El El w HH CO IX H U] 41 w M H V' U) 0 H N (V V• CO 01 N 0 0 0 U) 0 .. O 0 ri ri N N Cl V V V V U) H U) a0 N V 0 H r-1 d' V V d' d' V V' V' N N N a) a) .. a H 1t it 1 1# I* *k it 1# 4# 1* it 1* 4# #t it 11 U w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Jared D. Andrews, Planner I SUBJECT: Vacation of easement in Westridge Lake Estates APPLICANT: Steve Perlich MEETING DATE: December 21, 1999 INTRODUCTION: At its November 16, 1999 meeting the City Council set a public hearing to initiate the vacation of easements between Lot 1, Block 6, Westridge Lake Estates and Lot 5,Block 2 Westridge Lake Estates 2"d Addition. This easement needs to be vacated in order to accommodate a proposed Minor Subdivision. New easements will be required along the new lot line. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed vacation at its meeting of December 9, 1999, and recommended vacation of the easement with a unanimous vote. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve Resolution No. 5295, approving the requested vacation and move its adoption. 2. Deny the request to vacate the subject easement. 3. Table the proposed vacation to allow time to provide additional information. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer and approve Resolution No. 5295. �..,. Grp .4rar J d D. Andrews Planner I is\commdev\cc\1999\cc 1221\VACprlrs.doc RESOLUTION NO. 5295 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE VACATING AN EASEMENT ON LOT 1, BLOCK 6,WESTRIDGE LKAE ESTATES AND LOT 5 BLOCK 2 WESTRIDGE LAKE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION, CITY OF SHAKOPEE, SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA WHEREAS,it has been made to appear to the Shakopee City Council that the portion of easement as described in Attachment A, serves no public use or interest; and WHEREAS,the public hearing to consider the action to vacate was held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall in the City of Shakopee at 7:00 P.M. on the 215`day of December, 1999; and WHEREAS, two weeks published notice was given in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS; and by posting such notice on the bulletin boards on the main floor of the Scott County Courthouse, at the U.S. Post Office, at the Shakopee Public Library, and in the Shakopee City Hall; and WHEREAS, all persons desiring to be heard on the matter were given an opportunity to be heard at the public hearing in the Council Chambers in the City of Shakopee. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA: 1. That it finds and determines that the vacation hereinafter described is in the public interest; and 2. That the easement as described in Attachment A, serves no further public purpose. 3. That the easement as described above is hereby vacated. 4. That with the recording of the Minor Subdivision,new 10 foot easements will be acquired along both sides of the new lot line. 5. After the adoption of the Resolution, the City Clerk shall file certified copies hereof with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Scott County. RESOLUTION NO. 5295 Page 2 of 2 Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,Held the day of , 1999. Jon P. Brekke, Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk PREPARED BY: City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 e C •cription Sketch For: STEVE PE .ICH ATTACHMENT A / 4/... I P��90 e ° "Y........ ^ oo,+A y ^`Q /`.� �� it V- �Y n ` esO�R g1�1 / / „ \ r ` ��c. - C \ \ 0'0G \ y �`-- ' 1 ` P. C \\ 7t 1—', J uy,,--- c,..c.r0- ..- -. .. mss; co ,0 • ��o ]° , s°P \\ O \ r ';, c_ I l ',a{,, , <. L 0 T \ \ t �� `° %....—\ is. \ ats, , `!'�\F$O. \ ,\ J X9,7'9- t.:%." 0 o\ � `` ' iN$I. B L Q //moo, c; J .� �'�\ " 0-..,,,e). 1•;: EASEMENT TO ..-- , ++ \ i` T 0, k-. .. .=''BE VACATED .-- c: ' `- Q ` \ L O 1.,,,,:T., \ G \ 0 � G , \\ 6 �Q� - o 1E \ C K �� - 6_oc''o , a \ B L 0 -- N \ 0� \ /. \ O \ / / 25 �Ot •`; \ / M .o\\.•o� ��0I 146 . \ t Proposed legal description to vacate a drainage and utility easement All that part of Lot 1, Block 6, WESTRIDGE LAKE ESTATES FIRST ADDITION and that part of Lot 5, Block 2. WESTRIDGE LAKE ESTATES SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plots thereof, Scott County. -) .7)- Minnesota. lying 10.00 feet left of as measured at right angles to and parallel with and 10.00 feet right of as measured at right angles to and parallel with the following described line: Beginning at the northeast comer of said Lot 1: thence on an assumed bearing of South 38 degrees 38 minutes 30 seconds East, along the northeasterly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 316.03 feet. to the southeasterly corner of sold Lot 1 and there terminating. Except that part thereof lying within the southeasterly 10.00 feet of said Lots 1 and 5. • 1 Inch = 50 Feet • 2422 Enterprise Drive . -1‘4( * Mendota Heights. MN 55120 * (651) 681-1914 FAX:681-9488 *PIONEER ...o sue-t.as•oke e.r.eres E—moil: PIONEERENG.COM *engineering .Ya KAMM. k At r: 625 Highway 10 N.E. Blaine. MN 55434 . *. ** (612) 783-1880 FAX:783-1883 SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS E-moa PIONEER2CPRESSENTER.COM 1995185(11 nWc) i io=l o nn - 1;Q I CERTIFICATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 5295 I, Judith S. Cox, City Clerk of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 5295, presented to and adopted by the City Council of the City of Shakopee at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the 21St day of December, 1999, as shown by the minutes of the meeting in my possession. Dated this day of , 1999 Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SEAL 9, 6, CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Jared D. Andrews, Planner I SUBJECT: Vacation of a portion of Lewis Street Right-of-Way APPLICANT: Paul and Jo Ann Monnens MEETING DATE: December 21, 1999 INTRODUCTION: At its November 3, 1999 meeting the City Council set a public hearing to initiate the vacation of a portion of Lewis Street Right-of-Way in the P&V 2nd Addition. This portion of right-of-way is north of Mound Street. It has not been improved and dead-ends at the development to the north. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed vacation at its meeting of December 9, 1999, and recommended vacation of the right-of-way with a unanimous vote. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve Resolution No. 5296, approving the requested vacation and move its adoption. 2. Deny the request to vacate the subject right-of-way. 3. Table the proposed vacation to allow time to provide additional information. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer and approve Resolution No. 5296. Jared D. Andrews Planner I is\commdev\cc\1999\cc 1221\VACmonrs.doc RESOLUTION NO. 5296 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE VACATING A PORTION OF LEWIS STREET IN THE P&V 2ND ADDITION, CITY OF SHAKOPEE, SCOTT COUNTY,MINNESOTA WHEREAS,it has been made to appear to the Shakopee City Council that the portion of Lewis Street which is north of Mound Street all in the P&V 2nd Addition plat, City of Shakopee, County of Scott, State of Minnesota, serves no public use or interest; and WHEREAS,the public hearing to consider the action to vacate was held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall in the City of Shakopee at 7:00 P.M. on the 21s`day of December, 1999; and WHEREAS, two weeks published notice was given in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS; and by posting such notice on the bulletin boards on the main floor of the Scott County Courthouse, at the U.S. Post Office, at the Shakopee Public Library, and in the Shakopee City Hall; and WHEREAS, all persons desiring to be heard on the matter were given an opportunity to be heard at the public hearing in the Council Chambers in the City of Shakopee. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA: 1. That it finds and determines that the vacation hereinafter described is in the public interest; and 2. That the right-of-way over the following described property in the County of Scott, State of Minnesota, serves no further public purpose: That part of Lewis Street which lies north of Mound Street, all in the P&V 2nd Addition Plat, City of Shakopee, County of Scott, Minnesota. 3. That the right-of-way described above is hereby vacated. 4. After the adoption of the Resolution, the City Clerk shall file certified copies hereof with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Scott County. ti RESOLUTION NO. 5296 Page 2 of 2 Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Held the day of , 1999. Jon P. Brekke, Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk PREPARED BY: City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 3 � -- EXHIBIT A S # # *AO A 111111b% j 1111 Ilk % 4'4.41 iita AI iila :awl Piii4adrats MisfrAS ,. is' am 4 lam 11111110'' $`1" '-' 1 Ill MI6 . # a .., .. ... MI6111111111111 _ 1111111it Ain wi 11 it NP,10,;411111111 111111111111 II "-- ". lIeW .. II Illeun. - lig im 11111111.0. 4 oils . mar ....._ saw ionsiili 61 p Iipmm 0 ..„ 11111.11111111.1 drill . in imaivis A J 1 nimurilliat IE5::. Ili phohma DaDzz _I_ SHAKOPEE , Proposed Vacation of RIn6 +�- wo/ 1 I Parcels.shp CERTIFICATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 5296 I, Judith S. Cox, City Clerk of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 5296, presented to and adopted by the City Council of the City of Shakopee at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the 215` day of December, 1999, as shown by the minutes of the meeting in my possession. Dated this day of , 1999 Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SEAL 5- City of Shakopee Memorandum TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Hearing For The Adoption Of The 2000 Tax Levy And Budget Resolutions DATE: December 7, 1999 Introduction and Background The state requires that the tax levy and the budget be adopted at a hearing subsequent to the public hearing on the tax levy and budget which was December 6th. The Department of Revenue has indicated that the hearing may be held at a regularly scheduled council meeting. Resolution Number 55290 finally adopts the tax levy for payable 2000 . The total gross tax levy for 1999/00 is $30, 192 more than for 1998/99 due to changes in the General Fund Budget . It includes reimbursement to the General Fund for 1999/00 debt service levies transferred from the General fund in 1999 . Resolution Number 5291 adopts the 2000 Budget . The budget must be adopted after the tax levy. Action • Open the hearing and call for comments . • Offer Resolution Number 5290, A Resolution Setting the 1999 Tax Levy, Collectable In 2000, and move its adoption. • Offer Resolution Number 5291, A Resolution Adopting the 2000 Budget, and move its adoption. • Close the hearing. Gregg Voxland Finance Director n:\budget\budres00 RESOLUTION NO. 5290 A RESOLUTION SETTING 1999 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 2000 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, COUNTY OF SCOTT, MINNESOTA, that the following sums of money be levied as the tax levy in accordance with existing law for the current year, collectible in 2000, upon the taxable property in the City of Shakopee, for the following purposes : General Levy (net of HACA) $3, 234, 078 Transit Levy $ 357, 970 Debt Service - Fire Referendum $ 261, 760 (Market Value) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy to this resolution to the County Auditor of Scott County, Minnesota. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 21st day of December, 1999 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 5291 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2000 BUDGET BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA that the 2000 Budget with the estimated revenues and appropriations for the General Fund and the Special Revenue Funds as shown below is hereby adopted. Estimated Revenue Expenditures & Other Sources & Other Uses General Fund - (Personnel, Supplies & Capital Outlays) Mayor and Council $ 80, 130 Administration 249, 600 City Clerk 219,290 Finance 429, 990 Legal 298,500 Planning 574, 780 Government Buildings 253, 840 Police 2, 173, 740 Fire 705, 840 Inspection 428, 070 Engineering 541, 650 Street 904, 850 Shop 156, 240 Park 535, 430 Unallocated 209, 900 Transfers 347, 110 Total General Fund $8, 142, 140 $8, 108, 960 Transit Fund $509, 990 $509, 990 Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 21st day of December, 1999. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk AS: /9-. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum C 0 PU TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Dan Hughes, Chief of Police/Emergency Management Coordinator SUBJECT: Use of City Resources in the Event of an Emergency or Disaster DATE: December 16, 1999 INTRODUCTION: The Council is asked to approve the use of City equipment,personnel and expenditure of City funds in the event of an emergency or disaster. BACKGROUND: In accordance with State Statute and City Ordinance,the City Council is given the authority to manage city funds. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend the Council adopt Ordinance#564, authorizing the Mayor or his/her designee the authority to exercise discretion and make use of Shakopee City equipment, personnel and expend City funds in the event of an emergency or disaster. ACTION REQUESTED: If Council concurs,they should,by motion approve Ordinance#564, authorizing the Mayor or his/her designee the authority to exercise discretion and make use of Shakopee City equipment,personnel and expend City funds in the event of an emergency or disaster. 'V . 1 ' Dan Hughes 1,"'\ Chief of Police ORDINANCE NO. 564, FOURTH SERIES AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE USE OF CITY EQUIPMENT, PERSONNEL AND EXPENDITURE OF CITY FUNDS IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY OR DISASTER AND AMENDING SECTION 2.11 OF THE CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1 —Section 2.11 of the City Code is amended by adding a new subdivision to read: Subd. 12. Use of City Equipment and Personnel and Expenditure of City Funds. In the event of a disaster and when it is impossible or impractical to first seek City Council approval,the Mayor or his/her designee is authorized to exercise discretion and to use City equipment, supplies and personnel and to expend City funds as necessary to preserve and maintain the operation of City government and the safety and security of the public. Section 2—Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,held the day of , 1999. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members r- City Administrator From: Marvin Athmann,Fire Chief 74 Date: 12/11/99 Re: Replacement Fire Fighting Turn Out Gear Introduction The 2000 Fire Department budget has a line item under capital expenditures 4210 for replacement of fire fighter protective clothing for 15,000 dollars.The Fire Dept has been advised that there will be an 10 percent increase in cost for this gear if ordered after January 1st,2000.The Fire dept is proposing to order the Fire Fighting gear before January 1st.,2000.Then receiving the gear and paying for the gear in 2000. Discussion The Fire Dept has received two quotation for fire fighting turn out gear. They are:Fire Equipment Specialties$1,180.00 per set of gear and Lion Apparel$1,285.00 per set of gear. If the Fire Dept orders the gear before January 1st,2000 this would save the city approximately$118.00 per set of gear. Recommendation The Shakopee Fire Dept recommends the order of 12 sets of fire fighting at$1,180.00 per set for a total of $14,160.00 from Fire Equipment Specialties.With delivery and payment in the year 2000. Action Required City council to approve the order of 12 sets of fire fighting gear from Fire Equipment Specialties for $14,160.00. /5 3• CITY OF SHAKOPEE C O . 5 e AI 1—' Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor, City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator From: Dan Hughes, Chief of Police Date: December 17, 1999 Subject: Civil Defense Siren Purchase Introduction The Police Department is seeking approval to purchase 2 Civil Defense warning sirens to meet the growth needs of the City. Background The City's commercial and residential areas have expanded past the range of our existing siren placements. The new sirens will be strategically placed in areas of the City which will meet existing and future needs. Tentative plans are to place one of the new sirens near the new Fire Station and the second siren will be placed near Vierling Drive and Spencer St. to fill a void in the existing siren plat. We will continue to work with the Scott County Emergency Management to site our sirens in the most effective areas. Budget Impact The number of vendors available to provide bids on civil defense sirens is limited. Bids were received from two vendors; Front Line Fire &Rescue, Monticello, Mn and Fesler's Inc.,North Liberty, Iowa,both of which have supplied sirens to the City in the past. (see attachments) Front Line Plus Fire &Rescue Whelen WPS 2800-5 siren $14,635.00 MN sales tax $ 951.28 Shipping $ 500.00 Total $16,086.28 Fesler's Whelen WPS 2800-5 siren $15,200.00 MN sales tax $ 988.00 Shipping $ 750.00 Total $16,938.00 Front Line offers a 5% discount on the price of a siren if the invoice is paid within 10 days. Front Line's quote also includes no shipping fee if two sirens are purchased. Both vendors anticipate 18 weeks for delivery and a 7-10%price increase for sirens ordered after January 1, 2000. The 2000 Police Department budget has $35,400 identified for the purchase and installation of new civil defense sirens. If the sirens are ordered before January 1, 1999 and the invoice paid within 10 days of invoice date the City may save up to 15%in siren expenses for 2000. Action Requested If Council concurs, they should,by motion, authorize the appropriate City staff to purchase two Whelen Model WPS 2800-5 civil defense warning sirens from Front Line Fire &Rescue for$29,146.34. elk n Dan Hughes Chief of Police FRONT LINE PLUS FIRE& RESCUE 8004 Aetna Ave. N.E. Monticello, Mn. 55362 Metro Phone and Fax-295-3650 Outstate 1.800-878-3177 QUOTATION DATE;12-16- To;City at Shakopee Jerry Poole 416 Gorman St, Shakopee, Mn. 55379-2638 Shipping; FOB FACTORY Shipping Data ASAP/Approx 18wks, Terms NET 30 Days Invoice Date/See Early Pay Below Por Discount. QUANITY DESCRIPTION lea Whalen 2800-5119dB 100ft!Estimated 70Db range 8, t. Omni Directional Outdoor Warning Siren; Public Address Six Siren Warning Tones:Wail,Attack,Alert,Hi-Low,Pulsed, Airhorn,Slow Whoop. Local Controls. Battery Pawed with AC Battery Char+ger;(City to Supply Batteries). STP-089,Sci Test, Microphone. Tone Sequeich, RXTX, E-969 Encoder PRICE; (1)Siren, $14,835.00 Sales Tax; MN 115% $951.28 Shipping. City of Shakopee,Mn, ,OQ Total Above Price $18,088.28 Again if the City wishes to pay invoice within(10)days of invoice date,it may deduct off above price of siren only.$951.27(1)or$1.902.54 on(2)sirens purchased.Siren price then would be $13,883.73ea.Tax$889.44ea.Shipping$500.00ea. Should City decide to purchase(2)above#2800-5 Sirens,the total Purchase then would be with prepaymentdiscounts. $30,146.34 If city purchases(2)Sirens.We will ship direct(NO SHIPPING). We are pleased to submit the above quotation.This quotation is good for 30 days from the ave dat Thomas Greer Accepted by Date President fles/er s nc. Box 109-HWY 965 NORTH LIBERTY, IOWA 52317 December 16, 1999 Jerry Poole City of Shakopee 476 Gorman Street Shakopee,MN 55379-2638 By fax: 612-445-2313 Pesler's Inc. is pleased to provide the City of Shakopee with the following quotation for a Whelen WPS 2800-5 omnidirectional siren. This pricing is for one(1) siren and should be multiplied by the number of sirens that the City may desire to purchase. Fesler's Inc. does not have a Minnesota Retail Sales Tax license and therefore has not included the 6.5% MN sales tax. Sales tax would need to be paid by the customer. Qty Product Code Description Price Each 1 Whelan WPS 2800-5 119dBc omnidirectional siren $ 12,575.00 1 Whelan D864H10 One way radio control VHF High Band $ 975.00 1 Whelen STP666 Diagnostic Silent Test SI TESTI"' $ 295.00 1 Whalen WPSNCMIC Noise Canceling Microphone $ 85.00 1 Whalen CTCSS-R Tone Squelch $ 140.00 1 Whelen E969 35 function encoder $ 1,130.00 1 Freight Shipping for one siren from Chester, CT $ 750.00 Total Price $15,950.00 MN Sales Tax To be paid by customer $ 988.00 This quote is good for 30 days from date issued. Please contact Fesler's Inc. if we can be of any further assistance. ‘ZA1A4) Karen M. Pesler President Fesler's Inc. (319) 626-6520 • (800) 383-5483 • FAX (319) 626-2235 CITY OF SHAKOPEE ! . Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: Police Department Staffing Presentation DATE: December 16, 1999 INTRODUCTION: At its meeting of December 21st,the Police Chief will make a presentation on the status of staffing and other issues in the Police Department. BACKGROUND: Mayor Brekke has asked that Chief Dan Hughes present information on the status of several things at the December 21St City Council meeting: A. Staffing levels for year 2000. B. Status of training for officers. C. Status of K-9 dog use in the City. Chief Hughes will make an oral presentation, and may have some handout material. During that time,he is expected to report on 1998, 1999, and 2000 staffing levels. Included in that will be a status of grant receipts for those positions which are grant funded. ACTION REQUIRED: Unless there is direction from the Council,there is no action needed at this time. 7'LO Mark McNeill City Administrator MM:tw • 1 Police Department Staffing )4-y).11 1995-96 Allocated positions .5 seasonal Code Enforcement 3.5 Support Staff 16 Police Officers 3 Investigators 1 DARE Officer 12 Patrol Officers 3 Sergeants 1 Deputy Chief 1 Chief Total 21 sworn 4.0 FTE civilians **1 police officer position partially funded through Federal COPS Grant. 1997-98 Allocated positions .5 seasonal Code Enforcement 3.75 Support Staff 17 Police Officers 3 Investigators 1 DARE Officer 13 Patrol Officers 3 Sergeants 1 Deputy Chief 1 Chief Total 22 sworn 4.25 FTE civilians **2 police officer positions partially funded through Federal COPS Grant. COPS funding ended in late 1998 or early 1999. School District funds partial cost of DARE position. 1999 Allocated positions .5 seasonal Code Enforcement 3.75 Support Staff 18 Police Officers 2 Investigators 1 DARE Officer 1 Drug Task Force Officer 14 Patrol Officers 3 Sergeants 1 Deputy Chief 1 Chief Total 23 sworn 4.25 FTE civilians **DARE Officer position partially funded by School District. Cost for Drug Task Force Officer reimbursed by Task Force Grant. **In April Council accepted a COPS More Grant to fund 2 Community Service Officer positions. Local match of$13,350 funded through existing budget from Code Enforcement position. Total 23 sworn 5.75 FTE civilians 2000 Request 2 Community Service Officers 4.25 Support Staff 20 Police Officers 2 Investigators 1 DARE Officer 1 Junior High School Resource Officer 1 Senior High School Resource Officer 1 Drug Task Force Officer 14 Patrol Officers 3 Sergeants 1 Deputy Chief 1 Chief Total 25 sworn 5.75 FTE civilians **CSO funding through COPS More Grant. Local match from budgeted Code Enforcement dollars. **DARE Officer partially funded by School District. _ y **School Resource Officers—majority of funding from COPS In Schools Grant. Local Match funded by 1/3 School District contribution and 2/3 City contribution. **Task Force Officer cost reimbursed through Task Force Grant. O C6 N N }- O i N co Lis CD CD LOU) N"'"' (/) C 6 cl3 w .— 0 a) „7„....., sa. O Lc2 ow a) C I- - LO C/)O M L i N N CO ttS >- 4) - >1' c N Ln N >L co cl• a) 1 1 CC 14, d' M N r- 0 l To: Chief Hughes From: Sgt. Forberg Re: Assignments and the schedule for New Years Eve and New Years Day Friday, Dec.31, 1999 0700-1700 Officer Barney Clark 0700-1700 Officer Kevin Gulden 0700-1700 Sgt. John Flynn 1700-0300 Officer Cody Horner 1700-0300 Officer Les TenEyck 1700-0300 Sgt. Craig Robson 2000-0400 Det. Greg Tucci 2100-0700 Officer Ron Carlson 2100-0700 Officer Lisa Quick 2100-0700 Officer Jason Arras 2100-0700 Officer Clay Johnson 2000-0600 Officer Lynn Lipinski 2000-0400 C.S.O. Erin Lundy 2000-0400 Saturday, January 1, 2000 0700-1700 Sgt. John Flynn 0700-1700 Sgt. Bob Forberg 0700-1700 Officer Barney Clark 0700-1700 Officer Kevin Gulden 0700-1700 Officer Tom Crocker 0800-1600 Det. Molly Schrot 1600-0200 Sgt. Craig Robson 1600-0200 Officer Cody Horner 1600-0200 Officer Les TenEyck `, 2100-0700 Officer Jason Arras 2100-0700 Officer Clay Johnson 2100-0700 Officer Matt Conway � s As, 6. I, CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum To: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator From: Mark McQuillan,Parks and Recreation Director Subject: Park land Acquisition Date: December 15, 1999 INTRODUCTION The City Council is asked to direct staff to begin proceedings to acquire 10 acres next to Sun Path School for park purposes. BACKGROUND The current Comprehensive Park Plan indicates a major community park adjacent to Sun Path School. Sun Path School is an 18 acre site located on 17th Avenue south of the Shakopee by-pass. The 18 acres exceed the minimum guidelines established by the State for an elementary school. About 10 acres is used for outdoor physical education units and recreation. The City currently owns 10 acres of park property contiguous to the school property on the southern boundary. The City's long-range goal is to acquire another 20 acres to the east for a future youth athletic complex. Refer to drawing attached to this memo. The acquisition of the additional 20 acres will be done in two phases. Phase I is anticipated to consist of purchasing 10 acres from Gene Hauer. Mr. Hauer owns a 40 acre parcel of land adjacent to the school property and has received offers for the land from developers in the range of$50-52,000 per acre. Mr. Hauer is interested in selling the southwest quarter of his parcel to the City. At this time,the City has obviously not made a financial offer on the land. Typically, an appraisal would be performed, and the appraised amount would be offered to the property owner. Therefore, if the Council wishes to proceed, an appraisal will need to be ordered. For your information, Phase II is to acquire 10 acres south of Gene Hauer's property and east of existing park property. The land is currently own by Bob and Bill Schmitz who are farming the 70 acres they own. Rather than purchase Schmitz property now,the city should wait until the land is platted for development and acquire 7 acres from the developer through park dedication. The City would purchase 3 acres from the developer. BUDGET IMPACT: The 2000 budget provides for$500,000 in the Park Reserve Fund, for acquisition of parkland"south of the by-pass". ALTERNATIVES 1. Direct staff to have an appraisal done on the property. 2. Direct staff to look at different property. 3. Do nothing. RECOMMENDATION Alternative#1. ACTION REQUESTED Move to direct that an appraisal be performed, and that amount be reported back to the City Council prior to an offer being made. RoG Mark J. McQuillan Parks and Recreation Director I a 8 �.p1 I G' 6 6 W rSQ�{ ' O lilt' u f a grow - . J l i i i 2, a 11tH is o ....... I I N.1 �O � 1 ozo m _ ! - m� S w f - - O�� I6 D ,73 'n _ ;� :(13' 'tn < m I. O W -. org ,.. 111111),PP. ,1 : a --; r-�_ . .‘,4--, 4--, uNfWo I Z I p°Atp%-486 N`Ipript �„"9oc !� 1 4. V; UMW 0.¶4 : 41111t. Ike/ w 01.1111111.011111111tMilliffir Ink wing WS W O t 4e VI C. oc,c1-p;91-c`sgoo O I MM. w z �o LA I a . - II . , '1440A ' ... r--). T co z CD CD at I I m O i L 1 (01 I c A I 5 n ``J I • n fi I ( 0o CO o • g 4 a / 1 - MR , , , \ \ \ \\„, N \ i :Nal ....,, , 7777.7-v- 0 ...2,, \ „„--...\,_ \ .\ .,..., I , '% V I t.01 • IN I J $ '‘,_11-7ri C N (3 - 11---/- -• 1 n N *-, in 1 I I I i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 _ 1 1 S 1. IL t41 1N N I CITY OF SHAKOPEE C O N 5 € Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: Facilities Manager Resignation DATE: December 17, 1999 INTRODUCTION: The Council is asked to accept the resignation of Facilities Manager, Ron Stellmaker, and authorize the replacement process to start. BACKGROUND: On Friday, December 17th, Ron Stellmaker submitted his resignation. He has accepted a job in the private sector in Chaska,which will be a step up for him. His last day of work for the City of Shakopee will be January 7th . Ron was hired four years ago,just before the opening of the Community Center. He has been obviously the only Manager since that time, and has done a commendable job of operating the ice arena and City swimming facility. He will be sorely missed. We anticipate having a recommendation regarding his replacement to be shared at the City Council meeting on December 21st RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the resignation of Ron Stellmaker be accepted with regret, and that the Council authorize the replacement process to start. ACTION REQUIRED: If the Council concurs, it should,by motion, accept with regret the resignation of Ron Stellmaker as Facilities Manager at the Community Center, and follow up as appropriate with replacement action as presented at the December 21St meeting. Mark McNeill City Administrator MM:tw Is'. b. c2. Mark McNeill City Administrator City of Shakopee 12/17/99 This letter is to serve the purpose of informing you and the City of Shakopee of my resignation from my position as Facilities Manager for the City. My last official day will be Friday, January 7t`. I have greatly enjoyed the four years I have served the City as Facilities Manager and would like to thank the City for that opportunity. I am terminating my employment with the City to explore other career opportunities. I feel the Parks and Recreation Department has made great strides over the past four years and that there is a staff in place that will help the department grow and expand with the community. I would be more than willing to help in the hiring process of my replacement, by sitting on an interview committee or in any other way I can. I have been the only City staff member to oversee the Community Center since it was built and feel I could be an asset when it comes to choosing a candidate. Again, let me thank you and the City for the opportunity to serve the Community of Shakopee and I will do all I can over the final few weeks of my employment to make this transition go as smooth as possible for the rest of the Parks and Rec. staff. Sincerely, Ron Stellmaker Facilities Manager City of Shakopee /S . 8. 0 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: Item 15.B.2.—Facilities Manager Resignation DATE: December 21, 1999 The packet memo stated that more information would be provided regarding the replacement on this position tonight. After discussions with the parties involved, it is our recommendation that we take more time to investigate the possibilities. Therefore,no action other than accepting his resignation is necessary tonight. Mark McNeill City Administrator MM:tw • I . C. I . CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Jared D. Andrews, Planner I SUBJECT: Amcon Construction Appeal of Board of Adjustments and Appeals Denial of Request for a Conditional Use Permit MEETING DATE: December 21, 1999 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Line of Site Drawing Depicting Proposed Fence. INTRODUCTION: At its December 7, 1999 meeting the City Council heard the Appeal of Amcon for an auto body shop to be located northwest of Highway 169 and Marschall Road. The item was tabled to allow time for the applicant to resolve issues with the neighborhood association to the west of the site. Staff is in the understanding that the applicant met with the neighborhood association and agreements were made to install a wood fence for screening purposes in addition to the other conditions of the original staff report to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Staff has attached information from the neighborhood meeting for Council review. The attachment shows line of site drawings depicting the addition of a wooden fence in relationship to the three closest buildings. A portion of that fence is proposed to be higher than six feet to further block the view of the sign from the residents. Staff is expecting a letter from the association to be placed on the table. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Uphold the determination of the Board,and direct staff to prepare a resolution denying the requested conditional use permit for the consent agenda. 2. Uphold the appeal,and direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the request for the consent agenda with conditions as presented by staff. 3. Uphold the appeal,and direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the request for the consent agenda with conditions as modified by City Council. 4. Table the appeal for additional information. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer a motion directing staff to draft a resolution consistent with the Council's determination. Dec-16-99 10: 54A P-O2 ATTACHMENT A — › EA -0 aiL.) N _:r7) Z Z vl r'' 5 co Onz V1 D O C Si 13 Xm0 �o W C� � n Zx -10> o 4/.. D z r °m 0 5�� h -+ CD0I< to2 5r71nlO O D C7 Z `'- nmOO �*0 z rr1 5 -� __xim0 2= 1 Z O�� - '1 nmc m rr,gmmC)z r-i p -frn CD rn D = _ _ • .- -- -.- -- -- ..... i-:-;F. -- - ; \ - -.: • ' ;. • - • ; -Y_ z \ `. I In • n rte,, . �. • I 1 • cn C7 - c 1 • ) ., ...-\'... . > 0 . t; • .:Il i}-: t 0 \ O I o Z _ J.. rn ( tYl -,)0 , 1 t 1(1f1(1(;S).)19 1111 v1).1 ,IN(11 1)(1.'1111! qh;f 1 "I(l i ff-1'1•-110 Dec-16-99 10: 55A P.03 I N I N � < 73 i J ' or" n if I/ zzu1 -, Iy tO ca ca `n Zy f nIH z y Zlin U1Iri A C7 1 m rA —"E 0 I = o r I oig Z r rn IZ a Cl) z - n C7 0 O m i ,im O Z Z Sz TJ D Ii S Z z PRDPERTY LINE ROPERTY INE I ` I - ii U' \I R A a o_ C I 11 o ii O f '1 1 ', i \ I ' \\ 1 1 (r r I I0 IlZ�1 i� I it: Z I• I I 1411 1S , I � 133 O %,d • f IE. p (t 9 I le I p •I: I T `r 1 'o .z I s ' o ' I i o �•` t I I I I 1 I I - 1 I c231 I-nDAOE I rp I-no. xlm y0 I IRAKJ0 N Ovith u U . ICOn'v `I I Iz r- v I I in r, H ;-;; ,(II ' 1 f'rinnI1 c,'i(1 •nfl u1).1 A'lITI Nn1!J(1 9t-ni --1u1I l;f -tq -`l In Dec-16-99 1O: 55A P.04 cn v N >KTX) 0rn Or-- n HCl] �I ( � cn r ' � zzin � �j co m, � m m ; I CD rn O ! n Z No Cli m1I tn � m �I1 Cl m' V) o C at r tTICD m 73 �/ C V) z 0 0 t I rn O -0 z -II P•.PERTY UNE Pi- OPERTY SINE D Z 1 II Z --I `1 li II 0 O C s I. \ I I1 0 I I i 1 IV.? r I 4 li `� VI VI lm MI ii 33 IR lel 14 It, "' ‘v, 8 12 , IW, tiv T A iO t•o ,'Io ,e i0 1m I A i. I� .r O to 12 leen I i I2 \ .0 'i i i I i la ti nO�PO +r025 o 1m I"m y0 r� NO N I I N Q� ICOCO 111�� Ir z ,€j A ',r:I.P • I ,,onnnc;97141 •n!t "H.1 .0i(Y) wriiu IF:n1 ani RP a!-11n Dec-16-99 1O: 55A P.05 --1 D (n 1:1 N K = 73 n1 �r , \ npr- n w. N I u, ZZ (n crn rn C7 (0 Z � Z � Z I * Z iii acn I o m I zo -C z1m CO PRO'ERTY LINE P'OPERTY LINE Zrri 1, • � za \ ; 1',I I In 1 21n\ , ; II A ,In C 1 16. 0, ,1 L] f i Iti I ' 1, I1 I i .I iy �\S In 11N . 1 1=4 m Ir r rri Ir t r" rn `T �m ci 11 \� J i-n xi o ^ � t i �n ,o • !CoA `� 1n 10 to v/ l0 73 \3 1f -nI IS7 I� rn II Iz IZ t 1 -1 \ I ;1 1 W o Io o Z m 1r„mw0 zcI (nom +In rn caul 0 0 IC08D IF 1 0 r , (II•('O • I I-lI)npta?,Ir, 'OH "I4.1 ;WWI HfI.''ill ih:1)I in' 9R-hi '11 William J. Platto Attorney at Law Tel:(612)448-2005 218 Pine Street, P.O. Box 257 Fax:(612)448-4029 Chaska, Minnesota 55318 December 20, 1999 VIA FACSIMILE: 445-6718 Shakopee City Council Attn: Jared Andrews, Planning Staff Shakopee City Hall Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Application for Conditional Use Permit for Precision Auto Collision Center (PC-99-130) Dear Mr. Andrews: Enclosed herewith please find correspondence from the president of The Meadows South Townhomes Association dated December 16, 1999. As indicated, she is indicating that the Association Board unanimously approved a resolution strongly recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit in the above-captioned matter. Association president,Chanin Themes,has advised me that she will be present at the council meeting scheduled for tomorrow evening and will bring the original recommendation letter if you need the same for your file. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me Very truly yours, Pktir William J. latto WJPZ Enclosure cc: Joe Ryan iO'd dEI :EO 66-03-Daa • Mt.-eV-1777 1•+•1 i Mir,.I 1-11...P1111) rru. ••••� _� -- MEADOWS SOUTH TOWNHOMES ASSOCIATION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA December 16, 1999 Shakopee City Council Attn: Jared Andrews,Planning Staff Shakopee City Hall Shakopee,MN 55379 Re: Application for Conditional Use Permit for Precision Auto Collision Center (PC-99-130) Dear Members of the Shakopee City Council: I am writing in my capacity as President of the Meadows South Townhomes Association (hereafter "Association") in reference to the above application. As neighbors to the Crossroads Center, our Association is very interested in the type of development on the parcel in question. As you arc aware,the Association has previously voiced concerns about noise and lighting impacts on our neighborhood from the center. We have also voiced concerns over excessive foot traffic with some associated vandalism by people crossing our property going to and from the center. On Tuesday, December 14, our Association Board had the opportunity to meet with the applicant,Jeffrey Thomas.owner of the proposed Precision Auto Collision Center,his legal counsel, and Joe Ryan of Oppidan, the center developer. They provided us with a complete explanation of the proposed use of the property by Precision Auto Collision including a colored digital rendering of the building including the parking areas and landscaping plan. They also provided us with a siteline study which includes a newly added proposal to construct a six foot high white cedar fence on the top of the berm between our properties,together with a higher wood fence around the existing pylon Cub sign. I am enclosing a copy of this four page exhibit for your review. OurBoard was very impressed with the building,screening and landscaping plans proposed. We discussed all issues related to noise,visual aesthetics,lighting and air quality. We also discussed the impact of alternative uses of the property such as restaurants,hotels or two or more story office buildings. s As a Board. we are convinced that the use by the Precision Auto Collision Center, as proposed,will have the least impact on our neighborhood of any potential and probable uses. We believe that the visual impact from the site,with the addition of the six foot high white cedar fence is almost totally eliminated as documented by the siteline study. We are convinced that any negative impact to our neighborhood from noise, lighting of air quality will be minimal or non-existent. ZO'd dss=bO 66-9t-z'aa ZO'd d£L =£O 66-OZ-0aO ... b1CNib251b N.0�:"5d December 16, 1999 Page 2 In conclusion, our Board unanimously approves and recommends the granting of the Conditional Use Permit for the Precision Auto Collision Center as proposed. We look forward to having them as a good neighbor. Very truly yours, CL4,4N4k Chanin Metres Association President £O'd • TOTAL P,02 EO'd dtit =EO 66-OZ-tea❑ 1,112,•-•14-dd I Ur. 1 U%4U Ill It:Uf I I,UKI' I•N// I1U. ij 1(.0,10(11II)' I . de";ICJ _ 2 3 - J QI n \' ''� tii ( • mO ••:‘') W E ( - . ::\ Q U V w r V) \.Wf —l— a • � 1 ,,.,. . < rr(, . :w • , . . •• � • ... 1 1 wo1 - . . , . %. :„ . . ., .. ., .... .... ci , 1 I i.„:1,_,2, I • • . . • . . . . , . . , . ,_ . .... , . ..._ 4 z LLI ' . ' • • -4.;1 ', ' . . .. • mow. .},. • .\ZNZ• � \ ' J_ ]k SQ L.rrr �0 S W U�a� 0 (r Z[,7 W W .c L' U..1 wLJ IiI1--Z - 0 I 0 1_U '+- - Q Q z 'coLA- oC2 > U Q 7 3 4 4* O CO 0 V) L �� 0 Ii v O O wce ¢us Q H Z z V) 0 a, O � Ve� - in z z .- VCCI- 2 N Q_ to Q ib0'd &VC :£O 66-OZ-Da0 Ufa:- i4 d IOJh. 11;:4b ti11LU1i t.Uh;t' ► itn IIv, til U iUUlft) I • 0..5'1.1.., ,JZ a2O2i } n VIN W v � NLLc, i a0 O C I ccp am t ' \ I i \ i \ , 1 sr wicrI ::"Ji W,' 8' I i I Z 5 7.1 M. 1 - z I ol I f a\ U a � t N M1 ► �1 41 OI a�. ., 0 I L,1 Z! J 4 1 fir, ~1 I I N, N ►, 1 1 II f I 1 1. • , 1. 1 0 1,1 0 0 11 0 r 1 v a I' 0 3N►1 A18.3dOli j f 3P411ua7d0La w } Z 8 I U < z' 2 2 itZ O 0' 1 — U r o � j z IW z J q v LI0 2 ir 1 0 F-- c�i' W co U In n 2lo I a = i a � 0LIJcc �I ¢ n "-- 'arN � iCO2FWW z W I ZV)g � '" c71 0 I � ► V) ZZ i I Tt WW ° � II ► ( I CCr2 N 5O'd dt7i =£O 66-0Z-0aO ULU- l'I-:id iUr 1J. 1I tii'llkl t,UKI' 1.It,i Flu. b1d;iUUUbqi , u 1,u:. U, W 2' 4 4881 0-QSix0Z o �Giu►m� 4.t t.) ON'- I ao zor0a.1 0-1 n01110, nm 1 I 1 I ( 1 \ 1i. 0l 0 Z' $1 Vj Z 1 of U, C4 t`nl r'd` %k s( of UI la I Ell 'a N 1.11 WIrI „ .... Ni .4_,,,) SI 1 I • uInl A 1 i 0, 1 ` 11 i.tio `. - 1 1 \ c. o 8 If • Li 11 11 I— >- ` W 2 3Nn ua3d0 d3N11 .kitl3d•ad U n- I 1 Z g Q O V Lal z 0 0 —r- o I ti V/141 m mZ i��° @ m = Q D z oo ( I� m � H OZt� O � C0 CO U310 co'as V I 01H =, O < ( NI w w V � N cc t_-_ 90'd dtt :EO 66-OZ-Da0 al, l 4 jb ilk IU. ( Hi fUl1ll I,UKI I ttA NO. i,Irikiudk11,,F 1 , i,.;•tr, • W 0. sOZ1 6CCZ.JI 0. p7t I D 4V7@, WU ON IJI I n CC D Jha.O.ol 4m I I 1 3, \ 3I 1 of� � ZI , i ` 3il ta eel Ix! -J. O u' 0. p t at • ° Q T\ $ U ' UI • a in I a� � t CI, wt L �a� �i 1 1./ W' S 7) - , 9 j' I \ t tIt I ` I t \ C., �I o I ` I ! O J P v e II ; II I \ •- tr u J I � ` z Z ; \ 0 Q 3Nn 1�1213d0•d 3NI1 ,Ua3.08d a. Z I m J z I › o Q O 1 , W 0 0 Z O w_ 7 Z j 4ce W I I— F. 1— U m i U '07 c/7 T Z Z 0 ZV) O „,.....mal I I Z 0W (3 rn w ttin ' i0ll � (!) ZZ • Niii P CC r N ALO-d dST =£O 66-OE-�a0 CITY OF SHAKOPEE XS; C. Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Julie Klima,Planner II SUBJECT: Continental 95 Fund LLC Appeal of Board of Adjustments and Appeals Denial of Request for a Signage Variance MEETING DATE: December 21, 1999 INTRODUCTION: Tom Byland on behalf of Continental 95 Fund LLC has made application for a variance to the wall signage requirements in connection with the Kmart store under construction in Vierling Plaza. The public hearing on the request was held at the December 9, 1999 meeting of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals(the Board). The Board denied the request with a vote of 3-0,based on the following findings. Criterion 1 The strict enforcement of the ordinance provisions would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Undue hardship means the following: 1.A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls; Finding I.A. The property can be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The Board has not received any evidence to support the notion that increased signage is necessary for the site to be viable for development. 1.B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property; Finding 1.R The plight of the landowner is not due to circumstances unique to the property. The property is very similar to other properties guided for similar uses in the area. 1.C. The circumstances were not created by the landowner; Finding 1.C The circumstances are a result of the applicants desire to provide increased signage on site. 1.D. The variance,if granted,will not alter the essential character of the locality; and Finding 1.D. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. I.E. The problems extend beyond economic considerations. Economic considerations do not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Finding 1.E. The problems do not extend beyond economic considerations. Criterion 2 It has been demonstrated that a variance as requested will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this Chapter. Finding 2 The proposed variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of Chapter 11 (Zoning) in that there is no hardship or need to varyfrom the ordinance. Criterion 3 The request is not for a use variance. Finding 3 The request for a signage variance is not a use variance. Criterion 4 of Adjustment and A eals will insure compliance to Conditions to be imposed by the Board pp p protect the adjacent properties. Finding 4 (Not applicable if the application does not meet all the criteria for granting a variance) Criterion 5 Variances in the flood plain overlay zone also shall meet the following criteria: Finding 5 (Not applicable since the front of the property is not within the flood plain overlay zone). Also, please find attached (Exhibit 1) a copyof the appeal letter submitted byContinental 95 Fund PP LLC. In this letter,Mr. Byland proposes reducing his variance request from a total of 514 square feet of signage to 367 square feet. He suggests accomplishing this reduction by eliminating all signage other than the`BIG Kmart"and trademark. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Uphold the determination of the Board,and direct staff to prepare a resolution denying the requested variance for the consent agenda. 2. Uphold the appeal,and direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the request for the consent agenda. 3. Direct the Board of Adjustment and Appeals to review the variance application further. 4. Table the appeal for additional information. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer a motion directing staff to draft a resolution consistent with the Council's determination. lie Klima Planner II Jo, e/f , I i. ----- 1611 -- CONTINENTAL PROPERTIES December 14, 1999 COMPANY , INC. Julie Klima,Planner II D nn City of Shakopee CEON0 129 Holmes Street South DEb, Shakopee,MN 55379 1.9.99 RE: Kmart Store#9386 By Shakopee, MN Dear Julie: This letter is written to appeal the decision by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals (BOAA)to deny our request for a signage variance. Enclosed are the completed 3-part Appeal Application and the required$100.00 fee. As you are aware we asked for a variance to allow 514 square feet of signage on the west (front) side of the building. The BOAA stated that various reasons for the denial, but the leading cause was "too much signage". In order to facilitate the Signage Plan,we would like for the Council to consider granting an appeal that would allow erection of the sign as described on the enclosed drawing. This sign reads: "Big Kmart" and is their Copyrighted logo. The sign would be 36' 8 3/8"wide by 10' in height, for a total of 366.6 square feet(almost 34 square feet less than the allowed 400 square feet). Colors for this sign would be as follows: "BIG" letters are Blue Translucent Film. The"SWOOP"is Orange Translucent Film. The"K"is to match Pantone Red with"Mart" letters to be white. If the appeal were granted, Kmart would not install the illuminated signs on the north and south sides of the building as allowed under the current ordinance. In summary,this would allow almost 34 square feet less of total signage on the building and would eliminate the 100 square feet signs on the north and south sides of the building. The elimination of the sign on the north side of the building will obviously help satisfy the concerns of the neighbors. Please let me know if you should need anything further. Sincerely: CONTINENTAL PROPERTIES COMPANY, INC. Thomas E. Byland Development Director W133 N8569 Executive Parkway,P.O.Box 220•Menomonee Falls,WI 53052•Telephone 262.502.5500•Fax 262.502.5522 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Board of Adjustments and Appeals FROM: Julie Klima,Planner II SUBJECT: Wall Signage Variance MEETING DATE: December 9, 1999 SITE INFORMATION Applicant: Continental 95 Fund LLC Location: Vierling Plaza(south of Vierling Drive and east of County Road 17) Current Zoning: Highway Business(B1)Zone North: Hi wa Business 1 and Urban Residential 1B Zones Adjacent Zoning: gh y (B ) (R ) South: Highway 169 East: Medium Density Residential(R2)Zone West: County Road 17 and Highway Business(B1)Zone Comp.Plan: Commercial Attachments: Exhibit k Location Map Exhibit B: Applicant Correspondence Exhibit C: Signage Plans INTRODUCTION Continental 95 Fund LLC has made application for a signage variance in connection with Kmart store under construction within Vierling Plaza(for location see Exhibit A). Attached as Exhibit B is a copy of the applicant's correspondence explaining the request. Exhibit C is the plans for the proposed signage. CONSIDERATIONS The City Code would allow 200 square feet of wall signage along the front of the building. The applicant is proposing that signage on the front of the building include`BIG K'trademark along with "Garden Shop","Pharmacy"and"K Café". The total area required to accommodate the request of the applicant, according to Exhibit B,is 513.6 square feet. Therefore, a 314 square foot variance would be required to install the signage. The City Code would allow 100 square feet of signage on each of the north(facing Vierling Drive)and south (facing Highway 169) sides of the building. The applicant has stated that if the variance were granted, they would be willing to not install any signage along the north and/or south elevations of the structure now or at any time in the figure. FINDINGS Section 11.89, Subd. 2, of the City Code contains provisions for the granting of variances only if all of the following circumstances are found to exist Staff has provided draft findings on each criterion. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals may use or modify these draft findings as it sees fit: Criterion 1 The strict enforcement of the ordinance provisions would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Undue hardship means the following: 1.A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls; Finding I.A. The property can be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The Board has not received any evidence to support the notion that increased signage is necesscny for the site to be viable for development 1.B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property; Finding 1.R The plight of the landowner is not due to circumstances unique to the property. The property is very similar to other properties guided for similar uses in the area 1.C. The circumstances were not created by the landowner; Finding 1.0 The circumstances are a result of the applicants desire to provide increased signage on site. 1.D. The variance,if granted,will not alter the essential character of the locality; and Finding 1.D. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. 1.E. The problems extend beyond economic considerations. Economic considerations do not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Finding LE The problems do not extend beyond economic considerations. Criterion 2 It has been demonstrated that a variance as requested will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this Chapter. Finding 2 The proposed variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of Chapter 11 (Zoning) in that there is no hardship or need to vary from the ordinance. Criterion 3 The request is not for a use variance. Finding 3 The request for a signage variance is not a use variance. Criterion 4 Conditions to be imposed by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals will insure compliance to protect the adjacent properties. Finding 4 (Not applicable if the application does not meet all the criteria for granting a variance) Criterion 5 Variances in the flood plain overlay zone also shall meet the following criteria: Finding 5 (Not applicable since the front of the property is not within the flood plain overlay zone) ALTERNATIVES: 1. Direct staff to prepare a resolution, denying the valiance with findings as recommended by staff. 2. Direct staff to prepare a resolution,denying the variance with revised findings. 3. Direct staff to prepare a resolution, approving the variance with revised findings. 4. Continue the Public Hearing for additional information. 5. Table the decision for additional information. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that this application does not comply with Criterion 1A, B, C, E, and Criterion 2. Therefore, staff is recommending Alternative #1, directing staff to prepare a resolution denying a signage variance within the Highway Business(B1)Zone. ACTION REQUESTED Offer a motion directing staff to draft a resolution denying the request for a signage variance within the Highway Business(B1)zone with findings. I� NEM NM MIME F' MOM )� _l Ii . .rte — I C- _ _��`��6+ l I rill ..uuII•. ..� _: :az . • III 1111.j__,■..� ��► ilirr4inv Nizr 1 4 RIB 2ilfto tk- 1 we. ..,„ OmbellIIV'v 01011-+Iiirer 1.1 II° IF - 1B far-tra 010 ,�4 416�I1to 144 arili *Om pi ile , •. .... ...••= t;Sir* 0# � �I/; R3 = 111\ • �� #111,A, IA 44 i wan_ 11111111111111111111 MIL AN ,.. 1121112111111. 311ki 11.11110illgell UM MUM, 41 m 4401 CZ; lErr.: At IIIIIIIIIII VII UMW Ail, AI ��`�*�� I` !r iii ir —a ow 40. si► a: 112 i� iiiiii no, li I* **-- 4 - 111NrAr ' II1 it • 4 • AA.. A 1 anima witaiThomines ... =l��0 • �: 1 , R2 ii"%Ion�u►�� 1i� STH 169 R3 - 141011 ail .r AG \\ 0 D AG AG BI ®WA ----7 irFili N "IlLAI W E SHAKOY± moaMYr.sca$+aim S Proposed Sign Variance - Continental 95 Fund LLC EN Zoning.shp Parcels.shp 10/22/99 sm5rr A .411 ContinentalPro 'es Company,Inc. , Rif rarr '5 • October 15, 1999 Michael Leeks, City Planner • City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee,MN 55379 RE: Kmart Store#9386 Shakopee, MN Dear Michael: Please accept the enclosed application as our request for a variance to the Signage Code. We are requesting that wall sign area on the front of the Kmart building be increased from 200 square feet maximum to 514 square feet. 1. The strict enforcement of the 200 square feet maximum causes an undue hardship on Kmart because of the following: a. The BIG Kmart sign is a copyrighted trademark. Its area prevents the other three smaller signs ( K CAFE, PHARMACY, and GARDEN SHOP) from being approved. Without this means of advertising,Kmart would lose a reasonable use of these three aspects of its business. b. Kmart is sensitive to the residential areas on the north and east sides of the property. We realize that 100 square feet of signage can be placed on the north wall, however, we do not want to do this out of concern for our neighbors. We realize that we are allowed 100 square feet on the south wall as well. The residential zoning on two sides of the property render it unique. c. The circumstances regarding the zoning were not created by Continental or Kmart. d. Granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality, but will enhance it. The enhancement will occur due to the fact that no signage will be displayed on the residential zoned borders of the property. e. As stated in b. above,this unique problem extends beyond economic considerations. W133 N8569 EXECUTIVE PARKWAY. P.O.BOX 220. MENOMONEE FALLS. WISCONSIN 53052 TELEPHONE 414 502-5500 FACSIMILE 414 502-5522 • 1 2 2. We realize that the spirit and intent of the Zoning Chapter will be demonstrated if we are allowed to place all of the signage on the front wall of the building away from the residential zoning. We are willing to keep the north wall void of signage if allowed the variance. 3. This request is not for a use variance. 4. If the Board of Adjustment and Appeals allows this variance, it can be insured of compliance and will definitely protect the adjacent residential properties. In addition to the application, I have enclosed the following: a. Site Plan b. Names and addresses of property owners within 350 feet of Vierling Plaza. c. Evidence of ownership. d. The fee in the form of a check for$150.00. Please let me know if there is anything further needed. Sincerely: CONTINENTAL PROPERTIES COMPANY, INC. Thomas E. Byland Development Director cc. Douglas Kelley 10/26/99 15:08 FAX 1414 502 5522 . CONTINENTAL PROPERTIES ( J001 talPro Properties Company,Inc Contlnen p October 26, 1999 Julie Klima,Planner U City of Shakopee • 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee,MN 55379 RE: Sign Variance Application Kmart • Shakopee, MN Dear Julie: Thanks for your letter of October 21, 1999. We are updating the Property Owner List and will forward it to you soon. If the"6 month requirement"had been in the Variance procedures,we could have avoided this delay. the specific square footage areas for the signs proposed on the west elevation, q Regarding I offer: One set each of non-illuminated letters: "Garden Shop" 2'9" X 22'8" = 62.3 square feet «pharmacy" -2'9"X 19' = 52.2 square feet "K Café"-----2'9" X 11'10"= 32.5 square feet One set of illuminated channel letters and logo: "Big Kmart" ---10' X 36'8" = 366.6 square feet I have enclosed an elevation with these dimensions depicted. Confirming our intentions as to signage,if we are granted a variance for the above building signage,we do not intend to locate signage on any other elevation. If the variance is not granted,we intend to comply with the code,which allows 200 square feet • . on the west elevation and 100 square feet on each,the north and south elevations. It is also our intention to illuminate the latter. Should you have further questions,please let Inc know. Sincerely: CONTINENTAL PROPERTIES COMPANY, INC. Thomas E.Byland Development Director W133 N8569 EXECUTIVE PARKWAY, P.O.BOX 220, MENOMONEE FALLS. WISCONSIN 53052 TELEPHONE 414 502.5500 FACSIMILE 414 502-5522 • LI 'i g o ":41h VERUNG DRIVE . ti —ft 8 us u)g g 0 u) r---0 ........ ,. --g13 • . ., o i 2 . Am.§ IT S .. .. , • —r .. .. ,• ,, C) 0 1 0>3 g Ay N ' 1 z PYLON SIGN-----14] • i Frl ) i —I . O • 73 -rl 73 0 Z • t, • m O o Z 0 z -0 . (Li E. . 1 Y - ..... ,,-, , 1 AP,vs g . ; ,,.4...,i4,,,.,,,,., , i.,,,,-,,,,...„ cO' o- N Ov likp = ipill E F. , . ., N NO m C7)10. IN wI , . , . ,, ,..q sem .1.)m1 all w G, c., �. S o0 Of W ::',',..',..,,,,.;_.,,,,'3,''''''':": .'al 4 1 -%: �c , ,.. .. , ,. ., ,. ., , , t .. ., . , ,,., , ,...,: . I { : c O I c 1 0 r�WPROh➢ :: Z m { ' II • DRAWN I ' z� m � � X _L ,t `t9 � � __ b c)> ' (i) e -n o ?+OHO �` ' 1 r .. (n Os N j •""- 1 e 1 m 0O-ri co f Or } CONSENT CITY OF SHAKOPEE C Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Request by Valley Green Business Park for the City to Execute Covenant of Dedication and Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetlands MEETING DATE: December 21, 1999 INTRODUCTION: In the platting of Southbridge 1st Addition non-impact, impacted, and wetland mitigation areas were platted into "Park"lots. By virtue of their dedication to the City,the City has acquired an equitable interest in them. Under the Corps of Engineers permit, Valley Green is required to file the above-named documents related to the protection and preservation of said wetlands. Because of the City's equitable interest the City must authorize the filing of these documents. The documents have been reviewed by the City Attorney,who noted that the execution of the documents does not obligate the City to the Covenants or Declarations per se. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer and pass a motion authorizing the appropriate City officials to execute the Covenant of Dedication and Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetlands /?' 411P", R. Michael Leek Community Development Director SB1Cov.DOC/ML, 1 .. h Covenant of Dedication Valley Green Business Park Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, (hereinafter referred to as the "PERMITTEE") now stipulates to the following statements of fact; and further agrees to restrict the use and title of the realty described in Exhibit A to this document(hereinafter referred to as the "Land") in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein. Stipulations of Fact 1. That PERMITTEE is the applicant for Department of the Army permit number CENCSCO-R 98-02648-IP-GAE, to discharge fill material in wetlands adjacent to Dean Lake, in Scott County, Minnesota; and that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has regulatory jurisdiction over the discharge of dredged or fill material into said wetlands pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. (33 USC 1344). 2. That PERMITTEE is the owner of the real estate described in Exhibit A. 3. That PERMITTEE and the St. Paul district of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have reached an agreement whereby PERMITTEE will be permitted to discharge fill material in wetlands in accordance with the terms and conditions of Department of the Army permit number CENSCO-R 98-02648-IP-GAE; and that in consideration for said placement of fill in the wetland, PERMITTEE will provide mitigation for the adverse environmental effects resulting from the placement of fill material in the wetland by dedicating the realty described in attachment 1 for perpetual use as a conservancy area in accordance with the terms and conditions of this document and the above-mentioned permit. 4. That the above-mentioned dedication shall consist of the execution of this document by all parties necessary to restrict the use and title of the land; and that this document shall be recorded in the Office of the Registrar of Titles for Scott County, Minnesota. H:\Projects\Southbridge\Wetlands Info\Wetlands Monitoring Etc\CORP Covenant of Dedication for Southbridge.doc 1 5. That the Replacement Wetland is part of the property donated to the LGU for public park purposes in the Plat of SOUTHBRIDGE 1st ADDITION, and the LGU hereby consents to the terms of this Declaration for the purpose hereof. 6. That upon receipt of a certified copy of this document, as recorded in the Office of the County Registrar of Titles for Scott County, Minnesota,The District Engineer of the St. Paul District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will issue a validated permit,number CENSCO-R 98-02648-IP-GAE to PERMITTEE; and that said permit shall be issued in consideration for the execution of this Covenant. 7. That the terms and conditions of this Covenant of Dedication shall, as of the date of execution of this document, bind PERMITTEE to the extent of its legal and/or equitable interest in the land; and that this covenant shall run with the land be binding on PERMITTEE and its successors and assigns forever. 8. That the terms and conditions of this covenant shall be both implicitly and explicitly included in any transfer, conveyance, or encumbrance of the land or any part thereof, and that any instrument of transfer, conveyance, or encumbrance affecting all or any part of the Land shall set forth the terms and conditions of this document either by reference to this document or set forth in full text. Deed and Use Restrictions PERMITTEE hereby warrants that it is the owner in fee of the realty described in Exhibit A, and that the Land is hereby dedicated in perpetuity for use as a conservancy area. PERMITTEE hereby agrees to restrict the use and title of the Land as follows: 1. There shall be no construction or placement of buildings or mobile homes, fences, signs, billboards or other advertising material, or other structures, whether temporary or permanent, on the land. 2. There shall be no filling, draining, excavating, dredging,mining, drilling or removal of topsoil, loam, peat, sand, gravel, rock, minerals or other materials. 3. There shall be no building of roads or paths for vehicular travel nor any change in the topography of the land. 4. There shall be no removal, destruction, or cutting of trees or plants, spraying with biocides, insecticides, or pesticides, grazing of animals, farming,tilling of soil, or other agricultural activity. H:\Projects\Southbridge\Wetlands Info\Wetlands Monitoring Etc\CORP Covenant of Dedication for Southbridge.doc 2 5. There shall be no dumping of ashes, trash, garbage, rubbish, debris, vehicle bodies or parts,waste or other unsightly or offensive material. 6. There shall be no operation of snowmobiles, dunebuggies,motorcycles, all-terrain vehicles or any other type of motorized vehicle on the land. 7. This Covenant of Dedication may be changed,modified or revoked only upon written approval of the District Engineer of the St. Paul District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. To be effective such approval must be witnessed, authenticated, and recorded pursuant to the law of the state of Minnesota. 8. This Covenant is made in perpetuity such that the present owner and its heirs and assigns forever shall be bound by the terms and conditions set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Covenant has been executed , 1999. VALLEY GREEN BUSINESS PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota Limited Partnership, by VALLEY GREEN BUSINESS PARK, INC., a Minnesota Corporation, its General Partner By Wendell R. Kurtz, its Vice President STATE OF CONNECTICUT) ) SS. COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD ) On this day of , 1999, the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by Wendell R. Kurtz, the Vice President of Valley Green Business Park, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, as general partner of Valley Green Business Park Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, on behalf of the corporation and partnership. Notary Public H:\Projects\Southbridge\Wetlands Info\Wetlands Monitoring Etc\CORP Covenant of Dedication for Southbridge.doc 3 • Exhibit A Park 9, 10, 12, 13, 14 & 15, Southbridge 1St Addition, Scott County, Minnesota H:\Projects\Southbridge\Wetlands Info\Wetlands Monitoring Etc\CORP Covenant of Dedication for Southbridge.doc 4 . n CONSENT TO DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS FOR REPLACEMENT WETLAND This Consent to Covenant of Dedication ("Covenant") is made as of 1999, by the City of Shakopee, in Scott County, Minnesota, which address is 129 South Holmes Street, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (the "City"). The City is the Local Government Unit ("LGU") charged with approval of the Replacement Plan for the Replacement Wetland that is the subject of the Covenant to which this Consent is attached. The Replacement Wetland is part of the property donated to the City for public park purposes in the Plat of SOUTHBRIDGE 1St ADDITION. The City hereby consents to the the Covenant. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Mayor City Administrator City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF SCOTT ) On this day of , 1999, the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by , , and , the Mayor, City Administrator and City Clerk respectively of the City of Shakopee, a municipal corporation, on behalf of the City of Shakopee. Notary Public H:\Projects\Southbridge\Wetlands Info\Wetlands Monitoring Etc\CORP Covenant of Dedication for Southbridge.doc 5 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS FOR REPLACEMENT WETLAND THIS Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement of Wetland ("Declaration") is made this day of . 1999, by the undersigned Valley Green Business Park Limited Partnership,a Minnesota limited partnership, hereinafter referred to as the"Declarant." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Declarant is the fee owner of property containing a wetland (as defined in Minn. Rules par 8420.0110, subp. 52) that will be created or restored (hereinafter , "Replacement Wetland") and Declarant is also any other party defined as a Landowner under Minn. Rules par 8420.0110, subp. 29 who is seeking approval of(1) a replacement plan pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 1032G.222 and Minn. Rules part 8420.0530 or(b)a bank plan pursuant to Minn. Rules 8420.0740; and WHEREAS, the Replacement Wetland is located on the following described property of which Declarant is the fee owner,as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the Replacement Wetland is subject to the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991, Minn. Stat. §103G.222 103G. et seq., as amended, and all other provisions of law that apply to wetlands, except that the exemptions in Minn. Stat. § 103G.2241 do not apply to the Replacement Wetland, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 103G.222(h)and Minnesota Rules part 8420.0115; and WHEREAS, the Local Government Unit ("LGU") charged with approval of the Replacement Plan is the City of Shakopee, in Scott County, Minnesota, which address is 129 South Holmes Street, Shakopee,Minnesota 55379; and WHEREAS, the Replacement Wetland is part of the property donated to the LGU for public park purposes in the Plat of SOUTHBRIDGE 1ST ADDITION, and the LGU hereby consents to the terms of this Declaration for the purpose of; and WHEREAS, the LGU is hereby authorized to release from this Declaration any land contained in the above-described legal description if the LGU subsequently determines that non-wetland areas have been encumbered by this Declaration. M:\4271\941017\RAP\Declaration of Replacement Wetland.doc NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant makes the following declaration as to restrictions and covenants for the Replacement Wetland. The restrictions and covenants described below shall run with the land and shall be binding on the Declarant, its heirs,representatives, successors and assigns: 1. Declarant is responsible for maintaining the size and type of the Replacement Wetland, as specified in the replacement plan or bank plan approved by the LGU and on file at the office of the LGU. 2. Declarant is responsible for the costs of maintenance, repairs, reconstruction, and replacement of the Replacement Wetland which the LGU or Board of Water and Soil Resources may deem necessary to comply with the specifications for the Replacement Wetland in the approved replacement plan or bank plan. 3. Declarant hereby grants the proper authorities reasonable access to the Replacement Wetland for inspection, monitoring,and enforcement purposes. Further, Declarant shall be responsible for having a title search performed to determine any other parties who may have an interest in the land on which the Replacement Wetland will be located. Declarant acknowledges that it has obtained the consent of all such parties(e.g., mortgagees, contract for deed vendors or vendees, holders of easements, licenses, liens, etc.) and that the necessary consents are attached hereto. Further, Declarant shall record this Declaration and provide proof thereof to the LGU before proceeding with construction of the Replacement Wetland. Declarant shall be responsible for the costs of document recording. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Declarant has executed this Declaration. VALLEY GREEN BUSINESS PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,a Minnesota Limited Partnership, by VALLEY GREEN BUSINESS PARK, INC., a Minnesota Corporation, its General Partner By Wendell R. Kurtz, its Vice President ss STATE OF CONNECTICUT COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1999,by Wendell R. Kurtz, the Vice President of Valley Green Business Park, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, as general partner of Valley Green Business Park Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, on behalf of the corporation and partnership. Notary Public 2 M:\4271\941017\RAP\Declaration of Replacement Wetland.doc EXHIBIT A Legal Descriptions Park 9, 10, 12, 13, 14& 15, Southbridge 1s`Addition, Scott County,Minnesota M:\4271\941017\RAP\Declaration of Replacement Wetland.doc 3 r CONSENT TO DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS FOR REPLACEMENT WETLAND This Consent to Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland ("Consent") is made as of , 1999, by the City of Shakopee, in Scott County, Minnesota, which address is 129 South Holmes Street, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (the "City"). The City is the Local Government Unit("LGU")charged with approval of the Replacement Plan for the Replacement Wetland that is the subject of the Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland (the "Declaration") to which this Consent is attached. The Replacement Wetland is part of the property donated to the City for public park purposes in the Plat of SOUTHBRIDGE 1ST ADDITION. The City hereby consents to the submission of the Replacement Wetland to the Declaration. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Mayor City Administrator City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF SCOTT ) On this day of , 1999, the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by , , and , the Mayor, City Administrator and City Clerk respectively of the City of Shakopee, a municipal corporation, on behalf of the City of Shakopee. Notary Public 4 M:\4271\941017\RAP\Deciaration of Replacement Wetland.doc CONSENT CITY OF SHAKOPEE I($_; C • 5fe Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: 2000 Electrical Inspection Agreement MEETING DATE: December 21, 1999 INTRODUCTION: In 1999, the City contracted with Terry Krominga for electrical inspections. The contract expires December 31, 1999. Attached for the Council's consideration is a new contract with Mr. Krominga for 2000. There are no proposed language changes from last year in the contract. Because of the increasing cost to the City of electrical inspections, during the 2001 budgeting process, staff will review the option of bringing electrical inspections in-house ALTERNATIVES: 1. Renew the contract with Mr. Krominga as presented. 2. Renew the contract with Mr. Krominga with revisions. 3. Do not renew the contract and seek another source for electrical inspections. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the 2000 contract for electrical inspections with Mr. Krominga. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer and pass a motion authorizing the appropriate City officials to execute the electrical contract with Terry Krominga for the year 2000. R. Michael Leek Community Development Director FT FCINSP.DOC/ML 1 • CONSULTANT CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into this day of January, = by and between the City of Shakopee, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City" with offices at 129 S. Holmes St. , Shakopee, Minnesota 55379, and Terry Krominga, Box 91, LeSueur, Minnesota 56058, hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant. " WITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee desires to engage the Consultant to render electrical inspector services as more particularly described in Exhibit A; and .WHEREAS, the Consultant made certain representations and • statements to the City with respect to the provision of such services and the City has accepted said proposal . NOW, THEREFORE, for the considerations herein expressed, it is agreed by and between the City and the Consultant as follows : i . Services . The City agrees to engage the services of the Consultant and the Consultant agrees to perform the services hereinafter set forth as described in Exhibit A. 2 . Addition to Services . The City may add to the Consultant services or delete therefrom activities of a similar nature to those set forth in Exhibit A, provided that the total cost of such work does not exceed the total cost allowance as specified in Exhibit A hereof . The Consultant shall undertake such changed activities only upon the direction of the City. All such directives and changes shall be in written form and prepared and approved by the Building Official and shall be accepted and countersigned by the Consultant . 3 . Exchange of Data. All information, data, and reports as are existing, available and necessary for the carrying out of the work, shall be furnished to the Consultant without charge, and the parties shall cooperate with each other in every way possible in carrying out the scope of services . 4 . Term. This contract shall be for a period of one year. 5 . Pay. The City agrees to pay the Consultant in accordance with the terms set forth in Exhibit A, which shall constitute complete compensation for all services to be rendered under this contract. 6 . Termination. If, through any cause, the Consultant shall fail to fulfill in timely and proper manner Consultant' s obligations under this contract, including the requirement to have a bond and insurance in place, or if the Consultant shall violate y any of the provisions of this contract, the City shall thereupon have the right to terminate this contract by giving written notice to the Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least five (5) days before the effective day of such termination. Either party may, with or without cause, terminate this contract upon 30 days prior written notice. .Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any such breach of the contract by the Consultant. 7. Assignment . The Consultant shall not assign any interest in this contract, and shall not transfer any interest in the same, without prior written consent of the City thereto. None of the authority or responsibilities of this agreement may be transferred to another party. 8 . Confidentiality. Any reports, data, or similar information given to or prepared or assembled by the Consultant under this contract which the City requests to be kept as confidential shall not be made available to any individual or organization by the Consultant without prior written approval of the City. 9 . Interest . Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services to be performed under this contract . The Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this contract no person having such interest shall be employed. 10 . Discrimination. The Consultant agrees in the performance of this contract not to discriminate on the ground or because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation, or age, against any employee of Consultant or applicant for employment, and shall include a similar provision in all subcontracts let or awarded hereunder. 11 . Independent Contractor. The Consultant is an independent contractor and nothing contained herein shall constitute or designate the Consultant or any of Consultant' s agents or employees as agents or employees of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota. 12 . City Benefits . The Consultant shall not be entitled to any of the benefits established for the employees of the City nor be covered by the Worker' s Compensation Program of the City. 13 . Liability and Indemnity. The parties mutually agree to the following: 2 • a. In no event shall the City be liable to the Consultant for special, indirect, or consequential damages, except those caused by the City's gross negligence or willful or wanton misconduct. b. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City harmless from and against all claims, losses, and liabilities arising out of personal injuries, including death, and damage to property, which are caused by the Consultant arising out of or in anyway connected with this contract. Consultant further agrees to defend, indemnify, and hbld the City harmless from and against any claims, losses and liabilities arising out of the award of this contract to the Consultant . 14. Notices . All notices required or permitted hereinunder and required to be in writing may be given by first class mail addressed to City and Consultant at the address shown above. The date of delivery of any notice shall be the date falling on the second full day after the day of its mailing. 15 . Jurisdiction. This contract and every question arising hereunder shall be construed or determined according to the laws of the State of Minnesota. Executed the day and year first above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA By By Mayor By City Administrator By City Clerk Prepared By: The City of Shakopee 129 S . Holmes St. Shakopee, MN 55379 (KELEC] 3 .� r EXHIBIT A Description: The Electrical Inspector shall enforce the Minnesota Electrical Act, the Rules and Regulations of the State Board of Electricity thereunder, and the ordinances of the City of Shakopee pertaining to the licensing of electricians and electrical installations. All requested inspections shall be made within the City limits. Compensation: The rate of compensation shall be 80 percent of the electrical inspection fees collected by the City of Shakopee. The City shall remit this amount upon proper accounting for fees, on a bi-weekly basis . Security: The Electrical Inspector shall provide the City with an electrical inspector' s bond in the amount of $1000, payable to the City of Shakopee, in case of default. The bond shall be in effect until at least December 31, 1997. Insurance : The Inspector shall supply the City with a verification of automobile liability insurance on an acceptable form (e.g. Form 1927) showing insurance in amounts of not less than $50, 000 for any one person, $100, 000 for any one accident for personal injury, and $10 , 000 for property damage . Rules for Work: The Electrical Inspector shall comply with the following rules : 1. Report to the Building Official's office when called upon. 2 . Supply a monthly report of inspections completed. 3 . Deposit with the City any inspection fees received in the field. 4 . Have a Journeyman or Master electrician' s license in force at all times . Responsibility: The City is placing trust and authority upon the Electrical Inspector as an independent contractor qualified and certified as such to make electrical inspections on behalf of the City of Shakopee. [KELEC] CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Request to Order an Alternative Urban Areawide Review(AUAR) for proposed Valley Green Corporate Center MEETING DATE: December 21, 1999 INTRODUCTION: On November 16, 1999 Council acted affirmatively on a citizen petition requesting that an EAW be prepared for the proposed Valley Green Corporate Center. Subsequently, Council has approved the execution of an extension agreement with Bolton and Menk for preparation of the environmental review, and staff has met with the consultant to begin work. On Tuesday,December 7th staff met with the staff of the EQB,who suggested that the AUAR process might be particularly appropriate in this case ACTION REQUESTED: Offer and approve the attached resolution ordering the preparation of an AUAR for the proposed Valley Green Corporate Center. Ze71- e R. Michael Leek Community Development Director i:\commdev\cc\1999\cc1221\\AUAR.doc RESOLUTION NO. 5297 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE ORDERING PREPARATION OF AN ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW(AUAR)FOR THE PROPOSED VALLEY GREEN CORPORATE CENTER WHEREAS,the City of Shakopee received a citizen petition from the EQB requesting the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet(EAW)for the proposed Valley Green Corporate Center;and WHEREAS,on November 16, 1999 the City Council took action directing the preparation of an EAW;and WHEREAS, staff at the Environmental Quality Board(EQB)suggested that,absent a specific application for development on the proposed site,the Alternative Urban Areawide Review(AUAR) process would be an appropriate approach to conducting the environmental review of the proposed Valley Green Corporate Center; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA,that the City of Shakopee complete an AUAR for the proposed Valley Green Corporate Center; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the appropriate City officials be authorized to execute an agreement with Valley Green Business Park regarding the payment of costs incurred in preparation of the AUAR Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,Minnesota,held the day of , 1999. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk PREPARED BY: City of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee,MN 55379 /5-. O.- ), CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum C 0 ,V S e Al % TO: Mayor&City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Mike Huber, Engineering Tech. III SUBJECT: Southbridge Parkway Collector Street&Utilities,Project No. 1997-4 DATE: December 21, 1999 INTRODUCTION: Council action is required for a resolution accepting work and making final payment on Southbridge Parkway collector street,utilities and appurtenant work, Project No. 1997-4. BACKGROUND: All of the work for this project has been completed in accordance with the contract documents. Attached is a Certificate of Completion showing the original contract amount of$2,851,854.12 and the actual final costs of$2,977,237.64 for this project. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 5292, A Resolution Accepting Work on Southbridge Parkway Collector Street, Utilities and Appurtenant Work within the East Dean Lake Planned Unit Development, Project No. 1997-4 and move its adoption. C--a_____ XV Michael Huber Engineering Tech. III MH/pmp MEM5292 RESOLUTION NO. 5292 A Resolution Accepting Work On Southbridge Parkway Collector Street, Utilities And Appurtenant Work Within The East Dean Lake Planned Unit Development Project No. 1997-4 WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Shakopee on April 22, 1998, S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. has satisfactorily completed the Southbridge Parkway collector street, utilities and appurtenant work within the East Dean Lake planned unit development, in accordance with such contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,Minnesota,held this day of , 1999. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION CONTRACT NO. : 1997-4 DATE: December 14, 1999 PROJECT DESCRIPTION : Southbridge Parkway Collector Street & Utilities CONTRACTOR: S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. P.O. Box 69 Jordan, MN 55352 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 2 851,854.12 QUANTITY CHANGE AMOUNT $ (11,820.84) CHANGE ORDER NO, 1 THRU NO. 4 AMOUNT . , , $ 137,204.36 FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 2 977 237.64 LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS $ 2 977,237.64 FINAL PAYMENT $ -0- I, hereby certify that the above described work was inspected under my direct supervision and that, to the best of my belief and knowledge, I find that the same has been fully completed in all respects according to the contract, together with any modifications approved by City Council . I, therefore, recommend above specified final payment be made to the above named Contractor, Aiigr " 410''/l<af Professional Engi r 1,: a z CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum C 0 h/ 5 e TO: Mayor&City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Mike Huber, Engineering Tech. III SUBJECT: Southbridge Parkway Collector Street Landscaping, Lighting, Irrigation and Restoration Improvements,Project No. 1997-4A DATE: December 21, 1999 INTRODUCTION: Council action is required for a resolution accepting work and making final payment on Southbridge Parkway collector street landscaping, lighting, irrigation and restoration improvements, Project No. 1997-4A. BACKGROUND: All of the work for this project has been completed in accordance with the contract documents. Attached is a Certificate of Completion showing the original contract amount of$891,471.08 and the actual final costs of$889,924.13 for this project. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 5294, A Resolution Accepting Work on Southbridge Parkway Collector Street Landscaping, Lighting, Irrigation and Restoration Improvements, Project No. 1997-4A and move its adoption. /6c Michael Huber Engineering Tech. III MH/pmp MEM5294 RESOLUTION NO. 5294 A Resolution Accepting Work On Southbridge Parkway Collector Street Landscaping, Lighting, Irrigation And Restoration Improvements Project No. 1997-4A WHEREAS,pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Shakopee on August 20, 1998, Braun Turf Farms has satisfactorily completed the Southbridge Parkway collector street landscaping, lighting, irrigation and restoration improvements,in accordance with such contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,Minnesota,held this day of , 1999. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION CONTRACT NO. : 1997-4A DATE: December 14, 1999 PROJECT DESCRIPTION : Southbridge Parkway Collector Street Landscaping, Lighting, Irrigation and Restoration Improvements CONTRACTOR: Braun Turf Farms 2950 232nd Street E. Hampton, MN 55031 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 891,471.08 QUANTITY CHANGE AMOUNT $ ( 927.85) CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 THRU NO, 2 AMOUNT , , $ ( 619. 10) FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 889,924.13 LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS $ 889,924.13 FINAL PAYMENT $ -°- I, hereby certify that the above described work was inspected under my direct supervision and that, to the best of my belief and knowledge, I find that the same has been fully completed in all respects according to the contract, together with any modifications approved by City Council . I, therefore, recommend above specified final payment be made to the above named Contractor. Pro e sional Engine- /5;' D. 6 , CITY OF SHAKOPEE Q0 (\13 2 n1 -r- Memorandum TO: Mayor& City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Mike Hullander, Public Works Supervisor SUBJECT: Accepting Bid and Authorizing Purchase for an Asphalt Patching Box DATE: December 21,1999 INTRODUCTION: In the 1999 Equipment Acquisition Budget, the Public Works Department had identified a need for an asphalt patching truck. On September 17, 1999 our department requested and received authorization to advertise for bids for an asphalt patching box. This item is for Council to consider authorizing the Public Works Department to accept the bid from ABM Equipment & Supply, Inc. for the purchase price of$52,657.86 including sales tax. BACKGROUND: On September 17, 1999 the Public Works Department requested and received authorization to purchase a cab & chassis from North Star International Trucks, Inc., utilizing the State bid for a price of $37,775.55. The Public Works Department also received authorization to advertise for bids for the purchase of an asphalt patching box to complete the acquisition. The State and Hennepin County do not have an asphalt patching box on their bid list due to the difficulty in agreeing on one set of specifications. As an example of this difficulty, the Public Works Department chose specifications that would allow us to utilize this unit for other maintenance functions, such as placing gravel on the shoulders of roadways and adding ag-lime to the athletic field warning tracks. On December 14, 1999 sealed bids were opened and two bids were received. ABM Equipment & Supply, Inc. had the low bid for the purchase price of $52,657.86, including State sales tax. The total cost for the complete unit, (cab, chassis and asphalt box) is $90,433.41. The budgeted amount was estimated to be $90,000.00. The requested action is for Council to accept the low bid from ABM Equipment & Supply, Inc. and approve the purchase of (one) asphalt patching box for the purchase price of$52,657.86. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Accept the low bid from ABM Equipment & Supply, Inc. and approve the purchase of(one) asphalt patching box for the purchase price of$52,657.86. 2. Do not accept the low bid and do not approve the purchase. 3. Table for additional information. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council accept the low bid from ABM Equipment & Supply, Inc. and approve the purchase of (one) asphalt patching box for the purchase price of $52,657.86. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to accept the low bid from ABM Equipment & Supply, Inc. and approve the purchase of(one) asphalt patching box for the purchase price of$52,657.86. /vl • l• Michael ullander Public Works Supervisor /s-. o . V CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor&City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Design Criteria for Chapter 12 of the City Code Subdivision Regulations DATE: December 21, 1999 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 5279, a resolution adopting the attached and revised Design Criteria for the Subdivision Ordinance, which was adopted by the City Council at its September 21, 1999 Council meeting. BACKGROUND: The Subdivision Ordinance was recently revised and in this ordinance a section on Design Criteria was proposed to be approved by resolution, in order to more readily change technical standards as they change in the future. Attached to this memo is the December 7, 1999 Council memo on the Design Criteria, as well as the revised Design Criteria from comments received from the Council at that meeting. The changes received are as follows: • Section 2, Soil Erosion and Sediment Control, Subsection 2 - Rewording of the last sentence was necessary in order to clarify this statement. • Section 2, Soil Erosion and Sediment Control, Subsection 7 - The technical reference should be the City officially designates the Protecting Water Quality and Urban Areas as prepared by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as a technical reference for this section. • Section 7, Streets and Alleys, Subsection 2 - Street width and right-of-way width was discussed to maintain a street width of 36 feet for medium density and high density developments, due to the need of parking with those developments. Staff has revised this section, as per the direction of the City Council to incorporate those changes. Staff is recommending that this ordinance be adopted since the moratorium on plats has been lifted and the Design Criteria is need to work with the newly revised Subdivision Ordinance. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the proposed Design Criteria for the Chapter 12 Subdivision Ordinance as presented. 2. Approve the proposed Design Criteria for the Chapter 12 Subdivision Ordinance with revisions. 3. Do not approve the Design Criteria. 4. Table for additional information. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the Design Criteria for the Chapter 12 Subdivision Ordinance, as presented or as modified by City Council. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 5279, Approve the Design Criteria for Chapter 12 of the City Code Subdivision Regulations and move its adoption. nice Loney Public Works Director BL/pmp MEM5279 RESOLUTION NO. 5279 A Resolution Adopting Design Criteria For Chapter 12 Of The City Code, Subdivision Regulations WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Council adopted Ordinance No. 557, an ordinance replacing Chapter 12, Subdivision Regulations on September 21, 1999; and WHEREAS, the new Subdivision Regulations refer to adopted Design Criteria for the installation of public improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to revise the City of Shakopee's Design Criteria to reflect current construction and new technologies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: that it hereby approves and adopts the Design Criteria, a copy of which is attached hereto for use with Chapter 12 of the City Code, Subdivision Regulations. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: that copies of the Design Criteria shall be kept in the office of the City Engineer and open for reference at all times. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,Minnesota, held this day of , 1999. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk CityShakopeeof Design Criteria Adopted: December 21, 1999 City of Shakopee Design Criteria Page 1 Table of Contents Design Criteria - Grading, Street and Utility Improvements Sect. 1 Grading Sect. 2 Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Sect. 3 Storm Sewer Sect. 4 Sanitary Sewer Sect. 5 Utilities Sect. 6 Street Lights Sect. 7 Streets and Alleys Sect. 8 Sidewalks and Trails Sect. 9 Lots and Blocks Sect. 1 - Grading 1. Slopes/Grades. A. No final graded slopes shall be steeper than 3 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical(3:1). B. Driveway grades shall be less than 10%,and greater than 1.0%. Driveway grades shall not be greater than 6%within 10' of the street edge. Commercial and Industrial Driveways shall not be greater than 6%for any part of the driveway. C. Lots shall be graded so as to provide drainage away from building locations. 2. Topsoil - Sodding and Seeding. Topsoil moved during the course of construction shall be redistributed in turf establishment areas with a minimum of 4 inches of topsoil. Disturbed boulevard areas shall be seeded or sodded as required by the City Engineer. 3.Drainage. During the grading of the site,the natural drainage system shall be utilized as much as feasible for the storage and flow of runoff. 4. As-built Grading Plan. Upon completion of the grading of subdivisions, an as-built survey of the grading shall be submitted to the City. This plan shall show the existing grades of all lot corners,pads,and ponding areas. The plan shall certify that all ponding areas are within drainage and utility easements.Two benchmarks shall be shown on the as-built grading plan. No building permits shall be issued until this plan has been submitted and approved by the City Engineer. 5. Grading Permit. Grading Permits will be required, as described in Section 11.60, Subd. 6, of the City Code. City of Shakopee Design Criteria Page 2 6. Tree Preservation Fence. Existing trees which are to be saved, shall be protected with a tree preservation fence. This fence shall be installed at the drip line to protect the trees which are to be saved. No grading, construction materials,or equipment will be allowed beyond this fence. Sect. 2 - Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control 1. Purpose The purpose of this Section is to promote the public health, safety, property and general welfare of the citizens of the City and to conserve the soil, water and related resources and to control erosion and sedimentation caused by land disturbing activities. 2. Administration The Building Official or the City Engineer(depending on the land disturbing activity)shall be designated as the Administrator of this Section. 3. Activities Subject to Erosion Control Measures A. Any land disturbing activity in residential, multi-family, commercial or industrial zones shall be subject to erosion control measures provided that: 1. An area of 10,000 square feet or greater will be disturbed by excavation, grading, filling or other earth moving activities resulting in the loss of protective vegetation; or, 2. Excavation or fill exceeding 500 cubic yards; or, 3. The installation of underground utilities, either public or private, resulting in more than 300 linear feet of trenching or earth disturbance; or, B. Any subdivisions which require plat approval or a certified survey map. C. Agricultural lands used mainly for the production of food, general farming, livestock and poultry enterprises, nurseries, forestry, etc., are not subject to the provisions of this Section. D. Any other land disturbing activity for which the City Engineer determines to have the potential for substantial erosion. 4. Erosion Control Plans A. All land disturbing activities covered by this Section shall be required to have an approved erosion control plan on file with the City prior to any construction starting. B. The erosion control plan shall contain any such information necessary for the Building Official and the City Engineer to determine that adequate erosion control and sedimentation measures are proposed. As a minimum, a topographic map showing existing and proposed contours, location of any natural water courses and drainageways, the extent of the land disturbing activity and any erosion control measures shall be shown on the plans submitted and approved. C. In addition to the plans, a narrative report summarizing the proposed erosion control measures shall be submitted. This report shall include language discussing City of Shakopee Design Criteria Page 3 the timing of the installation, phasing, stabilization of all structures, maintenance and eventual removal of all structures. 5. Performance Standards A. General Standards. In general, this Section does not require the use of any particular type of structure to control erosion and sedimentation. The City Engineer or Building Official shall evaluate the proposed measures to determine if they follow current accepted design criteria and engineering standards. 1. The smallest practical area of land shall be exposed at any given time during development. 2. When soil is exposed, the exposure shall be for the shortest period of time. Within 30 days of the rough grading,the site shall be seeded and mulched. 3. All development shall conform to the natural limitations presented by the topography and soil as to create the best potential for preventing soil erosion. 4. Erosion control measures shall be coordinated with the different stages of development. Appropriate control measures shall be installed prior to development to control erosion. 5. The natural vegetation and plant covering shall be retained whenever possible. Temporary vegetation, mulching or other cover shall be used to protect critical areas and permanent vegetation shall be installed as soon as practical. B. Standards-Stormwater Runoff Erosion. 1. The natural drainage system shall be used as far as is feasible for storage and flow of runoff. Stormwater drainage shall be discharged to marsh lands, swamps, retention basins or other treatment facilities. Temporary storage area or retention ponds shall be considered to reduce peak flows, erosion damage and construction costs. If the drainage area is over five acres,a sediment basin shall be utilized. 2. Silt fence or hay bales shall be utilized to control erosion and prevent sedimentation from leaving the construction site. These structures shall be properly installed according to current standards. 3. If needed, sod shall be laid in strips at intervals necessary to prevent erosion and at right angles to the direction of drainage. 4. At existing storm sewer inlets, temporary sedimentation traps may be necessary to prevent erosion from entering the storm sewer system, and downstream waterbodies. City of Shakopee Design Criteria Page 4 5. Adequate provision shall be made to prevent the tracking or dropping of dirt or other materials from the site onto any street by the use of, gravel pads at all entrances. C. Exposed Slopes. The following control measures shall be taken to control erosion during construction: 1. No exposed slope shall be steeper in grade than three(3) feet horizontal to one(1)foot vertical. 2. Exposed slopes steeper in grade than ten (10) feet horizontal to one (1) foot vertical shall be contour plowed to minimize direct runoff of water. 3. At the foot of each exposed slope,a channel and berm shall be constructed to control runoff. The channeled water shall be diverted to a sedimentation basin (debris basin, silt basin or silt trap) before being allowed to enter the natural drainage system. 4. Along the top of each exposed slope, a berm shall be constructed to prevent runoff from flowing over the edge of the slope. Where runoff collecting behind said berm cannot be diverted elsewhere and must be directed down the slope, appropriate measures shall be taken to prevent erosion. Such measures shall consist of either an asphalt paved flow apron and drop chute laid down the slope or a flexible slope drain. At the base of the slope drain or flood apron, a gravel energy dissipater shall be installed to prevent erosion at the discharge end. 5. Exposed slopes shall be protected by whatever means will effectively prevent erosion considering the degree of slope, soils materials, and expected length of exposure. Slope protection shall consist of mulch, - sheets of plastic,burlap or jut netting, sod blankets, fast growing grasses or temporary seeding of annual grasses. Mulch consists of hay, straw, wood chips, corn stalks, bark or other protective material. Mulch shall be anchored to slopes with liquid asphalt, stakes, and netting or shall be worked into the soil to provide additional slope stability. 6. Control measures, other than those specifically stated above may be used in place of the above measures if it can be demonstrated that they will effectively protect exposed slopes. D. Dust Control Measures. 1. Temporary mulching or seeding shall be applied to open soil to minimize dust. 2. Barriers such as snow fences, commercial wind fences and similar materials shall be used to control air currents and blowing soil if the City Engineer determines it is necessary. 3. The exposed soil shall be watered to control dust, with frequency of watering repeated as necessary. City of Shakopee Design Criteria Page 5 4. Permanent vegetation shall be established as quickly as possible. Within 30 days after the rough grading has been completed the entire area shall be seeded and mulched. 6. Maintenance of Erosion Control Measures A. The owner or developer shall be responsible for maintaining all erosion control structures in a condition that will ensure continuous functioning of those devices. If, after the installation of the erosion control structure, the City Engineer determines that additional measures are needed, they shall be installed at the expense of the owner. B. Any erosion or sediment that runs off or blows off the site onto adjoining properties, City streets,.storm sewers, etc., shall be the responsibility of the owner or developer for clean up and restoration. If the owner fails to properly clean up or restore all areas affected by erosion the City will hire a contractor to complete the work and bill the owner for the expenses associated with the clean-up. 7. Technical Reference The City officially designates the "Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas" prepared by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as the technical reference for this Section. This reference will be used to ensure the proper placement and installation of any proposed erosion control structures. 8. Performance Bond The owner or developer shall submit to the City either a cash bond, an irrevocable letter of credit or other financial security to guarantee the faithful execution of the erosion control plan. This security shall be in the amount of 125% of the costs for construction of all erosion control devices, including the costs of City inspection and administration (as approved by the City Engineer). The City is authorized to draw against this security in the event the erosion control plan is not followed. 9. Unlawful Acts It is unlawful for any person,either by the owner or the occupant of premises,to violate, neglect or refuse to comply with the requirements of this Section. In addition, if the Building Official or the City Engineer determines that adequate erosion control measures are not being followed and there is little cooperation on the part of the owner to do so, a"stop work" order may be issued to the land disturbing activity until such times as adequate measures are implemented. In all cases, the owner may appeal the "stop work" decision to the Council for review. Sect. 3 - Storm Sewer 1. Design Criteria. The design criteria, policies, and objectives shall be those described in the City's "Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan". No existing ditch, stream, wetland, pond, drain or drainage canal shall be deepened, widened, filled, re-routed or filled without approval from the City Council. 2. Pond Slopes. Pond slopes shall not be steeper than 4 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical. All ponds shall have a "bench" at the normal water level. This bench shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and the slope of this bench shall not be steeper than 10 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical. City of Shakopee Design Criteria Page 6 Sect. 4 - Sanitary Sewer 1. General. The minimum diameter for public sanitary sewer mains shall be 8" diameter. sanitary sewer design must account for the study area and all areas outside the study area which would naturally drain through the study area. Natural drainage areas will be established by using the Comprehensive Sewer Plan and Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan adopted by the City. In no case shall the design velocity be less than 2.2 feet per second nor more than 10.0 feet per second as computed by Mannings formula for flow in open channels (Mannings shall be 0.013 for purposes of design). 2. Design Criteria. Sanitary sewers shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the most current edition of Recommended Standards for Sewage Works; a report of Committee of the Great Lakes-Upper Mississippi River Board of State Sanitary Engineers. Sect. 5 - Utilities 1. Public Water. Where a connection to the City water system is presently available at or reasonably near the boundary of the subdivision, water distribution facilities, including fire hydrants, shall be installed to serve all properties within the subdivision and shall be in accordance with policies of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. Public Water systems shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the standards and policies of the Shakopee Public Utility Commission. 2. Other Utilities. Electric service, phone service, and cable television installations to residential structures shall be underground from the main line to the residential structure except where extreme conditions prohibit and a variance from this requirement is authorized by the Planning Commission upon advice of the Utilities Commission. Provisions shall also be made for underground connections of street lights as required from main lines to the street line installation. Where telephone, electric and/or gas service lines are to be placed underground, conduits or cables shall be placed within easements or dedicated public ways, in such a manner so as not to conflict with other underground services, and in locations as approved by the City Engineer. All drainage and other underground utility installations which traverse privately-owned property shall be protected by easements. Sect. 6 - Street Lights Design Criteria. The subdivider shall provide for installation of street lighting and operation for a period of three (3) years as prescribed by the Utilities Manager. Street lighting shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the standards and policies of the Shakopee Public Utility Commission and the City of Shakopee. City of Shakopee Design Criteria Page 7 Sect. 7 - Streets and Alleys 1.General. A. The arrangement of thoroughfares and collector streets shall conform as nearly as possible to the Comprehensive Plan. Except for cul-de-sacs, streets normally shall connect with streets already dedicated in adjoining or adjacent subdivisions, or provide for future connections to adjoining unsubdivided tracts, or shall be a reasonable projection of streets in the nearest subdivided tracts. The arrangement of thoroughfares and collector streets shall be considered in their relation to the reasonable circulation of traffic, to topographic conditions, to runoff of stormwater, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed uses of the area to be served. B. Where the plat to be submitted includes only part of the tract owned or intended for development by the subdivider, a tentative plan of a proposed future street system for the unsubdivided portion shall be prepared and submitted by the subdivider at the same scale as set forth herein. C. When a tract is subdivided into larger than normal building lots or parcels, such lots or parcels shall be so arranged so as to permit the logical location and openings of future streets and appropriate resubdivision, with provision for adequate utility connections for such resubdivision. 2.Street Width and Right-of-Way Width. A. Two-way right-of-way widths and pavement widths(face to face of curb)shall conform to the City's adopted Transportation Plan, with the exception of the local roads. The local road width shall be as follows: Classification Right-of-Way Roadway Local(anticipated traffic of 200,or less,cars per day,as determined by the City Engineer) 60 Feet 32 Feet Local(more than 200 cars per day) 60 Feet 36 Feet B. All one-way right-of-way widths and pavement widths(face to face of curb)shall conform to the following minimum dimensions: Classification Right-of-Way Roadway Local 45 Feet 24 Feet Collector Streets 60 Feet 28 Feet Arterial Streets 60 Feet 28 Feet Alleys City of Shakopee Design Criteria Page 8 Industrial or Commercial 20 Feet 16 Feet Residential(where permitted) 16 Feet 12 Feet (Pavement Width) 3. Streets and Alleys. A. Public Streets and alleys shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the Construction Standard Specifications for Public Works. All street and alley construction shall be inspected by the City Engineering Department. B. The full width of the right-of-way of each street and alley dedicated in the plat shall be graded. The width shall comply with the surface provisions of this Chapter and Class V MN/DOT aggregate or other suitable base shall be required as prescribed by the Engineering Department. C. All streets shall be surfaced with a bituminous surface or portland cement concrete. D. Except where justified by special conditions,such as the continuation of an existing alley in the same block, alleys will not be approved in residential districts. Dead end alleys shall be avoided, whenever possible, but if unavoidable, such dead end alleys must provide adequate turnaround facilities at the closed end. E. Concrete curb and gutter may be required as a part of the required street surface improvement and shall thus be designed for installation along both sides of all roadways in accordance with the standards of the City. The City shall inspect all construction. F. Rural roadway sections, that do not include concrete curb and gutter, shall consist of roadside ditches and 5 foot gravel shoulders. 4.Grades. All center line gradients shall be at least 0.5 percent and shall not exceed the following: Classifications Gradient Percent Arterial Streets 5 Collector Streets 5 Local Streets 7 Marginal Access Streets 7 Alleys 8 The grades at intersecting state-aid streets shall not be greater than 0.5% for 50' on either side of the state-aid street, and not greater than 2.0% for an additional 50'. The grades at intersecting arterial streets shall not be greater than 2.0% for 200' on either side of the intersection. On local streets, the grade shall not be greater than 3.0% for 100' on either side of the intersection. The more important street at an intersection, as determined by the City Engineer,shall govern the through grade. 5. Street Jogs. Street jogs (intersections less than 330 feet apart) must be approved by the City Engineer. City of Shakopee Design Criteria Page 9 6. Local Streets. Local streets shall be so aligned that their use by through traffic will be discouraged. Dead end streets are prohibited, but cul-de-sacs will be permitted where topography or other conditions justify their use. 7. Cul-de-sacs. A. Maximum length of cul-de-sac streets shall be 1,000 feet for rural service areas and 750 feet for urban service areas measured along the center line from the intersection of origin to end of right-of-way. Cul-de-sacs shall have a dedicated right-of-way with a minimum radius of 60 feet, and shall be paved with a minimum radius of 45 feet (to face of curb). Lot lines abutting cul-de-sacs shall be radial except in extreme cases where special permission may be granted otherwise. 8. Temporary Cul-de-sacs. In new subdivisions where a future public street will connect to a temporary street stub, a temporary cul-de-sac will be required. The maximum length of temporary cul-de-sac streets shall be 750 feet for both rural service and urban service areas, measured along the center line from the intersection of origin to end of pavement. The minimum paved surface diameter shall be 60 feet, without curb and gutter. A temporary cul-de-sac will not be required for street stubs that serve less than 3 lots. 9. Service Roads. Where a subdivision abuts or contains an existing or planned service road or a railroad right-of-way,the Council may require a street approximately parallel to and on each side of such right-of-way for adequate protection of residential properties and to afford separation of through and local traffic. Such marginal access streets shall be located at a distance from the major thoroughfares of railroad right-of-way suitable for the appropriate use of the intervening land,as for park purposes in residential districts, or for commercial or industrial purposes in appropriate districts. Such distances shall also be determined with due regard for the requirements of approach grades and future grade separations. 10. Half Streets. Half streets shall be prohibited, except where essential to the reasonable development of the subdivision in conformity with the other requirements of these regulations; and except where the Council fmds it will be practicable to require the dedication of the other half when the adjoining property is subdivided. Wherever there is a half street adjacent to a tract to be subdivided,the other half of the street shall be platted within such tract. 11. Surface. All street surfaces shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the standard specifications and shall have a one-year warranty period after being completed and accepted by the City Engineer,before being accepted by the City for maintenance. Curb and gutter or shoulder and bituminous surfacing shall be constructed at the same time. 12. Reserve Strips. Reserve strips controlling access to streets shall be prohibited. 13. Hardship to Owners of Adjoining Property Avoided. The street arrangement shall not be such as to cause hardship to owners of adjoining property in platting their own land and providing convenient access to it. City of Shakopee Design Criteria Page 10 14. Access to Arterial and Collector Roadways. In the case where a proposed plat is adjacent to an arterial or collector road, the applicant shall not direct vehicle or pedestrian access from individual lots to such roadways. The subdivider will be required to provide access to all lots via public streets. Spacing of these public streets shall meet the requirements of the City's adoj,ted Transportation Plan. 15. Platting of Small Tracts. In the platting of small tracts of land fronting arterial roadways where there is no convenient access to existing entrances and where access from such plat would be closer than 1/4 mile from an existing access point, a service road 40 feet wide shall be dedicated across the tract. As the neighboring land is platted and developed, and access becomes possible to the service road,direct access to the thoroughfares shall be prohibited. 16. Deflections/Horizontal Curves . When connecting street lines deflect from each other at any one point by more than 10 degrees,they shall be connected by a curve with a radius of not less than 200 feet. This minimum curve radius does not apply to intersecting street lines (full street intersections)or to street lines connected at "1"intersections. Collector street horizontal centerline curves shall not have a radius of less than 455 feet. 17. Street Vertical Curves The following desired design speeds and minimum vertical curve lengths shall be used for street profiles: Design Minimum Speeds Vertical Curve Length Arterial Street 50 mph 150 feet Collector Street 45 mph 130 feet Local Street 35 mph 100 feet If the algebraic difference between grades within a vertical curve is less than 1.2 percent, the allowable minimum vertical curve length is 50 feet. 18. Angle of Intersections. The angle formed by the intersection of streets shall be 90 degrees. Any variance will require approval by the City Engineer. 19. Size of Intersection. Intersections of more than four corners shall be prohibited. 20. Curb Return Radius. Curb return radius at intersections shall conform to the following table: Curb Return Radius(feet)at Intersections Local(32') Local(36') Collector Arterial Local(32' wide) 20 Local(36' wide) 20 15 Collector 25 20 20 Arterial 30 25 25 25 Industrial 30 25 25 25 21. Crosspans. Double crosspans may be used at the intersection of residential streets only when necessary to prevent flooding of one side of the street. Crosspans are not allowed across collector City of Shakopee Design Criteria Page 11 or arterial streets. Crosspans are not allowed on streets with storm sewer systems or on other streets designated by the City Engineer. 22. Street Section Design The street section shall be designed as set forth in the "Road Design Manual" 5-291.523 and 5.291.524, as prepared by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. It shall be accompanied by a complete soils report certified by a Registered Professional Engineer. The following minimum pavement thickness and aggregate thickness shall apply to all streets: Minimum Minimum Bituminous Pavement Aggregate Base Arterial Street 4" 6" Collector Street (Residential) 4" 6" Collector Street (Commercial) 4" 6" Collector Street (Industrial) 4" 6" Local Street 3 1/2" 6" Sect. 8 - Sidewalks and Trails 1.Sidewalks A. The sidewalks shall not be located less than one foot from the property line,nor be adjacent to the curb except as determined in commercial areas. Sidewalks in industrial areas shall be located to conform to the anticipated pedestrian flow of the development. B. Sidewalks shall slope 1/4 inch per foot away from the property line and the profile grades shall conform to street grades. C. Planned unit development shall be subject to the location, widths, and grades set forth herein. D. The subdivider shall install sidewalks on both sides of an officially designated arterial street and on one side of collector streets, and walkways to schools; such collector streets and walkways to be determined by the Planning Commission and approved by the Council. If the street is along a designated trail route,a bituminous trail may be required in place of the sidewalk,as determined by the Planning Commission and approved by the Council. E. In blocks over 900 feet long,pedestrian crosswalks through the blocks, and at least 10 feet wide, may be required by the Council in locations deemed necessary to public health, convenience and necessity. F. Curb returns and intersections where sidewalk is required shall have handicap ramps. City of Shakopee Design Criteria Page 12 G. All sidewalks widths shall be 5 feet, except in commercial areas where the width may be wider,as determined by the City Council. Sect. 9 - Lots and Blocks 1. Easements A. Easements across lots or centered on rear or side lot lines shall be provided for utilities and drainage where necessary and shall be at least 10 feet wide for telephone or power line easements and 20 feet wide for drainage, sewer or water easements. Underground utility installation shall be required. B. Where a subdivision is traversed by a water course, drainageway, channel or stream, there shall be provided a stormwater easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with lines of such watercourse, and such further width or construction, or both, as will be adequate for the purpose. Parallel streets or parkways may be required in connection therewith. C. Drainage and utility easements shall be shown on the final plat, out to the 100-year high water level contour. D. Access easements, for future maintenance, shall be provided for ponding areas within subdivisions. 2. Blocks A. Block length and width or acreage within bounding streets shall be such as to accommodate the size of residential lot required in the area by the Zoning Chapter and to provide for convenient access,circulation control and safety of street traffic. B. Residential block lengths shall not exceed 1,300 feet. Blocks intended for commercial and industrial use must be designed as such, and the block must be of sufficient size to provide for adequate off-street parking, loading and such other facilities as are required to satisfy the requirements of the Zoning Chapter of the City Code. C. A block shall be so designed as to provide two tiers of lots, unless it adjoins a railroad or major thoroughfare where it may have a single tier of lots. 3. Lot Standards A. The lot dimensions shall be such as to comply with the minimum lot areas specified in the Zoning Chapter. ter. City of Shakopee Design Criteria Page 13 B. Side lines of lots shall be substantially at right angles to straight street lines or radial to curved street lines. C. In the subdividing of any land, due regard shall be shown for all natural features, such as tree growth, wetlands, steep slopes, watercourse, historic spots, or similar conditions, and plans adjusted to preserve those which will add attractiveness, safety and stability to the proposed development. D. All remnants of lots below minimum size left over after subdividing of a larger tract must be added to adjacent lots rather than allowed to remain as unusable parcels. E. Double frontage (lots with frontage on two parallel streets)or reverse frontage shall not be permitted except: 1. Where lots back on an arterial or collector street,in which case vehicular and pedestrian access between the lots and arterial streets shall be prohibited. Such double frontage lots shall have an additional depth of at least 20 feet in order to allow space for screen planting along the back lot line. 2. Where topographic or other conditions render subdividing otherwise unreasonable, such double frontage lots shall have an additional depth of at least 20 feet in order to allow space for screen planting along the back lot line. F. All lots must abut their full frontage on a publicly dedicated street. G. Rural service lots shall be designed in such a manner whereby septic tanks, drainfields and homes are located as to allow future subdivision of the land upon the requirement of the City Engineer where future urban service expansion is probable. The City may also require at the time of final subdivision approval that a covenant be recorded which requires the placement of future structures in accordance with approved preliminary plat design. Whenever a parcel of land is subdivided into lots containing one or more acres and there are indications that such lots may eventually be subdivided into smaller plats, the Council may require that such parcel of land be divided so as to allow for the future construction of streets and the extension of adjacent streets. Easements providing for the future opening and extension of such streets may be made a requirement of the plat. H. All lots or parcels shall have direct adequate physical access for emergency vehicles along the frontage of the lot or parcel from a public roadway 4. Buffering Residential Subdivision Adjacent to Intermediate and Principal Arterial Roads A. In all residentially zoned areas determined by the Administrator to have significant noise impact within 125 feet of the roadway right-of-way or areas of noise impact estimated to maintain ambient decibel ratings of 70 DbA or greater, one or a combination of the following design requirements shall apply: 1. Lots adjacent to the roadway right-of-way shall be sized wherein a 125 foot buffer strip be provided as additional setback to lot depth or width standards City of Shakopee Design Criteria Page 14 supplementary to the minimum lot size and setback of the zoning provisions of the applicable district. 2. An earth berm or other acceptable barrier technique shall be constructed to abate noise impact adjacent to roadway right-of-way equal to or below the 70 DbA standard accompanied by the following: a) A plan showing the existing and anticipated noise levels in DbA that are or will be expected on the site and in the immediate vicinity of the site. b) A description of the site plan construction techniques, architectural designs, and other measures expected to be taken to reduce ambient noise levels. Such description shall include sufficient plans and other drawings to enable the City to accurately identify the noise reduction measures expected to be taken. B. Prior to approving a preliminary plan as required by this Chapter, the City shall determine that the noise levels will be successfully reduced to meet the ambient 70 DbA standard. (Ord. 58, May 7, 1981; Ord. 233, December 10, 1987; Ord. 246, June 17, 1988; Ord. 287,January 16, 1990; Ord. 302,January 25, 1991; Ord. 338; August 6, 1992) Buffering Residential Dwellings Adjacent to Wetlands and Stormwater Ponds In all zoned areas where residential dwellings are adjacent to, or are within 100 feet of a wetland or stormwater pond,the following design requirements shall apply: 1. All residential dwellings shall be at least 15 feet horizontal from the 100-year high water level of the wetland or pond. 2. In commercial or industrial zoned areas where a stormwater pond is proposed to be within 100 feet of a residential dwelling, a fence shall be installed along the property line separating the commercial zoned (or industrial zoned) area and the residential property. City of Shakopee Design Criteria Page 15 i 5 V CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: Adams Street No Parking Restrictions DATE: December 16, 1999 INTRODUCTION: The Council is asked to consider action regarding a recent Scott County decision to remove the "No Parking"restrictions from the west side of Adams St., between Sixth and Tenth Avenues. BACKGROUND: Several years ago, County Road 15 (Adams Street)was widened to four lanes, using Federal Aid monies. Because of Federal requirements, it is two traffic lanes in each direction;no parking is allowed any where on that section of County Road 15. Earlier this year, requests were made to both the City and the County by a resident in that area to allow for parking on the west side of Adams Street(the east side is adjacent to the Minnesota Women's Correctional Facility). It is unclear as to how widespread the request for allowing parking on Adams Street is. The City deferred action on that, as it has no jurisdiction on this section of County Road 15. After some time researching this, the County did request of the State permission to be exempted from the requirements of CSA, and to allow for parking on the west side. The State agreed to allow this to happen. As such, in November,the County removed No Parking signs on the west side County Road 15 between Sixth and Tenth Avenues. Shortly thereafter, another resident contacted the Mayor and Councilor DuBois, stating concerns about safety. The expressed problems regarded traffic turning onto County Road 15 from Sixth Avenue, or proceeding south on Adams Street after cresting the hill southbound, and potentially running into parked cars which were not expected in what had been a traffic lane. In November,the City contacted the County, requesting that the signage be reinstalled, at least until the situation could be discussed. DISCUSSION: As the State is agreeable to having No Parking restrictions removed, it is a policy decision that needs to be made regarding whether parking will be allowed to remain. From a safety standpoint, City staff's concern is that the area in question is not properly striped for parking to be allowed on one side-typically in Shakopee,the current traffic markings would be interpreted as two traffic lanes, if what would become the parking lane and single traffic lane are separated only by a broken white traffic stripe. In response,the County Highway Engineer indicates that this type of striping is common for other areas of the Twin Cities, specifically Minneapolis and St. Paul, where parking is allowed at certain times in lanes that are otherwise used for traffic movement. However, this would be the first such case in Scott County. RECOMMENDATION: Because this is a County jurisdictional issue,we recommend that, at minimum, the Council pass a motion asking that Scott County replace the No Parking signs until the street can be restriped when warm weather returns in the Spring. An alternative would be to request that Scott County immediately and permanently replace the No Parking signs on the west side of County Road 15. ACTION REQUIRED: The Council should formally direct that a letter be sent to Scott County, outlining its desire for signage on that section of County Road 15. ak,0 14611011) Mark McNeill City Administrator MM:tw ....-- RI 5Wj1 Ills, or,„ 5TH AVE Iti '1111111111111111""-5v AVE *1*1 !tot 1 sto it RIVER VIEW PARK 5T AVE 01 1 AVE ti I I I rat M '1 FEI$itt1øø!! AVEtio I itsippy ori I i _ . iffaTaikQia: - , aL , 10TH AVE 10TH AVE >- r I 1- I- 8 0 U #. * 4 1 PROJECT AREA wk7N STREET PARKING CHANGE ALONG '-7--s — :',"2:3"316."4-= .°^�-:3 w�«- WEST SIDE OF ADAMS STREET '" ,wd W" " '� "- 1 SHAD (CO RD 15) FROM 6TH AVENUE �' 0210` TO 1 C1TH AVFNI IF c 0+c "' ,d, _ #-g SCOTT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS GOVERNMENT CENTER .,... 200 FOURTH AVENUE WEST SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1220 (612)496-8100 JOSEPH WAGNER,DISTRICT I Fax: (612)496-8180 DALLAS BOHNSACK,DISTRICT 2 http://www.co.scott.mn.us ART BANNERMAN,DISTRICT 3 BARBARA MARSCHALL,DISTRICT 4 ED MACKIE,DISTRICT 5 November 30, 1999 Mark McNeill Shakopee City Administrator 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mark: Brad Larson provided me a copy of your letter of November 29, 1999 recommending that No Parking signs on the west side of Adams Street be replaced pending discussion with residents in the area. I have considered your rationale for wanting the signs replaced and have the following comments. We have cars parked on streets all over town, many streets much narrower than this one, and it doesn't present any safety hazards. I also don't believe that it's necessary to change the striping. To eliminate street parking seems unfair to these residents when nearly everyone else in town is allowed to park on the street in front of their houses. Also, these residents lost a portion of their driveways when this street was widened. I would respectfully ask those who are making this recommendation if they would be amenable to no street parking in front of their houses. An Equal Opportunity/Safety Aware Employer- Mn/DOT and the county approved elimination of No Parking signs on one side of the street. I am opposed to reversing this action, especially considering the low traffic volume on this street. Sincerely, Art Bannerman Commissioner,District 3 c: Jane DuBois Jon Brekke Brad Larson #-g 4 SCOTT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS GOVERNMENT CENTER 200 FOURTH AVENUE WEST SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1220 (612)496-8100 JOSEPH WAGNER,DISTRICT I Fax: (612)496-8180 DALLAS BOHNSACK,DISTRICT 2 http://www.co.scott.mn.us ART BANNERMAN,DISTRICT 3 BARBARA MARSCHALL,DISTRICT 4 ED MACKIE,DISTRICT 5 November 30, 1999 Mark McNeil Shakopee City Administrator 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mark: Brad Larson provided me a copy of your letter of November 29, 1999 recommending that No Parking signs on the west side of Adams Street be replaced pending discussion with residents in the area. I have considered your rationale for wanting the signs replaced and have the following comments. We have cars parked on streets all over town, many streets much narrower than this one, and it doesn't present any safety hazards. I also don't believe that it's necessary to change the striping. To eliminate street parking seems unfair to these residents when nearly everyone else in town is allowed to park on the street in front of their houses. Also, these residents lost a portion of their driveways when this street was widened. I would respectfully ask those who are making this recommendation if they would be amenable to no street parking in front of their houses. An Equal Opportunity/Safety Aware Employer r SHAKOPEE November 29, 1999 Brad Larson Associate Administrator Scott County Highway Dept. 600 County Trl. E. Jordan, Mn 55352-9339 FAX: 496-8365 Dear Brad: To follow up on my phone message on November 24th,the City of Shakopee requests that the no parking signs on the west side of Adams Street be put back up until discussion can take place with all of the neighbors. It is my understanding that Commissioner Bannerman has been working with some residents in the area, but it is my further understanding that that may not be a unanimous consent. At minimum,the street should be restriped to two lanes, so that individuals turning south from west Sixth Avenue, or proceeding south on Adams after cresting the hill don't strike vehicles parked in the western most lane. This is especially a concern after dark. The City Council would like to review this and make a recommendation, although we realize that this is a County jurisdictional issue. Sincerely, AkQ Mark McNeill City Administrator MM:tw CC: Jon Brekke, Mayor Jane DuBois, Councilor COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 129 Holmes Street South• Shakopee,Minnesota• 55379-1351 • 612-445-3650 • FAX 612-445-6718 RESOLUTION NO. 3983 1 A RESOLUTION RESTRICTING PARKING ON COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 15 BETWEEN 13TH AVENUE AND 6TH AVENUE SP 70-615-06, SAP 70-615-07, AND SAP 166-020-06 i 1 WHEREAS, the County of Scott has planned the improvement of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 15 from 13th Avenue to 6th Avenue; and i WHEREAS, the County of Scott will be expending County State Aid Highway Funds on the improvement of this street; and WHEREAS, since this improvement lacks adequate width for parking on both sides of the street, approval of the proposed construction as a County State Aid Street Project must therefore include certain parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: That the City of Shakopee shall prohibit the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of CSAH 15 from 13th Avenue to 10th Avenue, _ and, on both sides of CSAH 15 from 10th Avenue to 6th Avenue so long as CSAH 15 is a County highway. Adopted in session of he City Counci of the ofShako ee M' ne o a held this 12 da of City p y . l/ 1994 . / I _; Ake . ti Mayor, ' :t+7 • Shakopee71 ATTEST: . :i filk •.44 ed . L_ Ci. Clerk Ci y Atto ey / y rw 77. '. 4"4..; .-4 .c."4.; '''. ,,, ' t:.,74t''s Y, .bl rt .-." }` p-;-v Zyq'x v � r '" ,p.. ...,_x z Tv v.y-,s,,, s,;_ % ,. ._. - $. �,..':*Y".-,a.P'h•�c ` `,`,,„` .- v _ _...ti >......._.:a �.__ _r � � ,e _` ri ....._``.�t '• w � "' _ `?i s.S`- _ �.�. IS', 5. l CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum .. .Y ir TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director SUBJ: Closing TIF District No. 9 (FMG) DATE: December 16, 1999 Introduction & Background Tax Increment Financing District No. 9, FMG has reached the end of its allowable life. Resolution No. 5298 documents official decertification of the district. Action Offer Resolution No. 5298, Resolution Decertifying Tax Increment Financing District No. 9, and move its adoption. Gregg Voxland Finance Director I:\finance\docs\taxinc\close#9 CITY OF SHAKOPEE RESOLUTION NO. 5298 RESOLUTION DECERTIFYING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 9 BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council ("Council") of the City of Shakopee ("City") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The City has previously established its Minnesota River Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project") pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 469.001 to 469.047 ("HRA Act");and 1.02. Within the Project the City has created Tax Increment Financing District No. 9 (the "TIF District")pursuant to Sections 469.174 to 469.179(collectively,the "TIF Act"). 1.03. The Project and the TIF District are now administered by the Economic Development Authority for the City of Shakopee("Authority"). 1.04. The Authority and City have determined that is in the best interest of the City to decertify the TIF District as of December 31, 1999. Section 2. TIF District Decertified; Filing. 2.01. The TIF District is hereby deemed decertified as of December 31, 1999. 2.02. The Authority is authorized and directed to transmit a copy of this resolution to Scott County with instructions to de-certify the TIF District, it being the intent of the City that no collection of tax increment from the TIF District will be distributed to the Authority after December 31, 1999. Approved by the City Council of the City of Shakopee this 21st day of December, 1999. Mayor Attest: City Clerk SJB-173378v1 SH235-1 /5E, c. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Paul Snook,Economic Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Request for Proposals for Development of Parcels 43 &39,Excess MnDOT Property MEETING DATE: December 21, 1999 Introduction&Background: Council is asked to approve the enclosed Request for Proposals for development of parcels 43 and 39,excess MnDOT property that the City is acquiring. Council directed staff to acquire the above parcels and offer the property for sale and development through a request for proposal (RFP)process. As you recall,the City's acquisition of this property was prompted by an interested developer/ end user offering$50,000 per acre for the 26.42 acres with the intent of developing a new automobile dealership.Rather than entertaining the interest of only one developer,you gave direction to seek other offers and developments through an RFP process,with the minimum purchase price being$50,000 per acre.It should be noted that the interested developer is also considering other sites in Shakopee. Since receiving authorization at the December 7th City Council meeting, staff has worked with MnDOT to provide assurance that the environmental clean-up issues will not create a problem in land transfer for redevelopment in the future(MnDOT will not normally enter into an agreement holding the City harmless from any future environmental claims that might be presented by a developer). The City Attorney is working on appropriate language;the City will not close on the purchase of these two parcels until we are satisfied that the environmental issue will not be a problem. Options 1. Approve the enclosed Request for Proposals document for seeking development of parcels 43 and 39,and direct staff to post in appropriate publications. 2. Do not approve the Request for Proposals document. 3. Table for additional information. Recommendation Option 1.Approve the enclosed Request for Proposals document for seeking development of parcels 43 and 39, and direct staff to post in appropriate publications. Action Required Offer and pass a motion to approve the Request for Proposals document for development of parcels 43 and 39, and direct staff to post in appropriate publications. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO DEVELOP A COMMERCIAL COMPLEX ON PARCELS 43 AND 39,AT U.S. HIGHWAY 169 and SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY 69 IN SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA Submit Response To: City of Shakopee Attn: Paul Snook Economic Development Coordinator 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee,MN 55379 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. General Objectives 3. The Redevelopment Property 4. The Price 5. Standards and Controls 6. How to Participate 7. Submission of Proposals rfpprc143.DOC Introduction The City of Shakopee is seeking proposals for development of an important site in the southwest portion of the City. The site is strategically located at the intersection of U.S.Highway 169 and Scott County Highway 69,with excellent access to the Minneapolis—St.Paul metropolitan area and southwestern Minnesota. The site is excess property that the City intends to acquire from the Minnesota Department of Transportation(MnDOT). General Objectives The general objectives of this request for proposal are two-fold: 1. The City of Shakopee desires to make known to the development community that the above referenced property is available for purchase and development. 2. The City of Shakopee wants to ensure that the potential buyer or buyers are capable and willing to develop the property in a manner that will-promote industry and provide employment, and will be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.As part of this transaction,the City will require the developer to comply with certain limitations and restrictions that ensure development of the property in accordance with the City's objectives. The Development Property Attached to this request for proposal is a site map showing the subject property. The property contains 26.42 acres and is zoned for highway business uses.The City of Shakopee has entered into an agreement with MnDOT to acquire the property. The Price The City prefers a cash sale of the property for not less than$50,000 per acre,totaling$1,321,000. Each proposal should include the following: 1. A detailed description of the type of commercial businesses and other uses which will occupy this development, including square footage and estimated market value; 2. The developer's acquisition and development costs, 3. Operating costs; 4. Anticipated debt service; 5. Expected return on equity presented in ten-year projections;and 6. Number of jobs to be created on the site,and estimated wages. The proposal should demonstrate the feasibility of the project and support the proposed acquisition price. Standards and Controls To assure the best utilization of the site in accordance with the City's comprehensive plan for development of this property,the following conditions are part of the offer: 1. The developer shall agree: a. To use all property for uses and purposes designated in the proposal; rfpprc143.DOC 2 b. To begin the development within a period of time which the City determines as reasonable. Specific milestones include: 1. Closing and execution of development documents. 2. Start of Construction- Within 12 months from the closing date of the City's transfer of interest to developer.If work has not started by the agreed upon timeframe,the City reserves the right to terminate any development agreements and re-purchase the property at the original purchase price and take other measures to ensure its development. Site preparation shallnot constitute "start of construction"within the meaning of this paragraph. 3. Project Completion-Within 24 months of start of construction c. That the legal documents shall incorporate such obligations of the developer as the City deems necessary,proper,or convenient to effectuate the provisions of this proposal. Such provisions shall be for the sole use and benefit of the City of Shakopee. 2. The City of Shakopee specifically reserves the right to review and approve the developer's plans and specifications for development. Such review and approval shall be concerned primarily with, but not necessarily limited to conformance with standards set in the City's zoning ordinance. 3. All applicable land use and zoning regulations of the City of Shakopee shall apply to the development area. How to Participate The submission of proposals will be in two specific phases.The information shall be in sufficient detail to enable the City to give adequate consideration to the developer's proposal for the property being offered. These include: 1. Letters of Intent-All parties interested in the proposed redevelopment project shall submit a letter of intent to the City of Shakopee which contains the following information: a. A detailed narrative statement describing the previous experience of the developer, especially with regard to projects that are similar in scale and character to the proposed development and emphasizing aspects in which the developer's qualifications are believed to be unique. b. A list of the names and description of the experience of the consultants who would be used,such as the architect, landscape architect,attorney,accountant,contractor,and real estate management firm. c. Financial information verifying that adequate net worth and/or liquid assets are available to the developer for the proposed project including the most current financial statement. (All financial documentation will be considered confidential until final approval of a purchase agreement and development agreement.) d. A statement explaining how the project would be funded including the sources and amount of debt and equity financing.If funds are to be obtained from sources other than the developer,a statement should be obtained from such sources expressing interest in providing the necessary funds. rfpprc143.DOC 3 2. Detailed Proposals-After reviewing the letters of intent the City will then select a maximum of four(4)developers to submit more detailed proposals. These proposals will include but not necessarily be limited to the following information: a. A proposed development plan showing utilization of the property.Include three(3) copies of graphic site plans and elevations,to explain development proposals. b. A schedule of design,construction and initial occupancy period. c. An itemized estimate of construction costs and complete development costs. d. A ten-year operating projection and assumptions. e. A narrative statement explaining why the proposed use is consistent with the General Objectives outlined above and economically feasible.A description of the market assumptions,which support your revenue projections.The opinion of qualified market analysts should be provided. f. Detailed jobs and wage projections. All proposal information shall become public information unless otherwise noted above. Submission of Proposals 1 Letters of Intent: All initial Letters of Intent,whether mailed or hand-delivered,must be received by the City of Shakopee no later than close of business,4:30 p.m., . Letters of Intent shall be mailed or submitted to: City of Shakopee ATTN: Paul Snook,Economic Development Coordinator 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee,Minnesota 55379 Ten(10)copies of the Letter of Intent and support documentation shall be submitted for our review. If you have any questions,please contact Paul Snook,Economic Development Coordinator at(612)496-9661;FAX(612)445-6718;E-Mail: psnook@ci.shakopee.mn.us. 2 Detailed Proposals: Those selected to submit detailed proposals will be notified by written correspondence from the City of Shakopee. The deadline for receipt of the detailed proposals by the City of Shakopee will be stated in this notification. The City of Shakopee will review the detailed proposals and offers after their submission and notify all proposers of the results. The City of Shakopee reserves the right to reject any and all proposals. The developer selected by the City shall proceed with due diligence, in cooperation with the City,toward the execution of a Purchase and Development Agreement. rfpprc143.DOC 4 /5. E. . , CITY OF SHAKOPEE C 0A1! S C. A Y Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SUBJECT: Application for Deferment of Special Assessments DATE: December 14, 1999 INTRODUCTION: The City has received an application from Madge Tobias asking that the special assessments for her homestead be deferred. BACKGROUND: The City Code allows for the deferment of special assessments for applicants 65 years of age or older when certain requirements are met. Ms. Tobias has completed an application and based upon the information provided, she does meet the requirements for a deferment. Ms. Tobias received special assessments in the amount of $3, 109 for improvements to 5th Avenue in conjunction with the 1998 Street Reconstruction Program. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the application from Ms. Madge Tobias, 138 West 5th Avenue, and grant deferment of special assessments to parcel #27-001566-0 for the 1998 Reconstruction Program, pursuant to the conditions outlined in Section 2 .82 of the City Code. H:\judy\deferment j. . Ck ,/ 1S, E , Y CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Successful Completion of Probation DATE: December 14, 1999 INTRODUCTION: The City Clerk and Community Development Director are taking this opportunity to notify the City Council that the services of Lynette Walsh have been satisfactory and recommend that she be retained in the position of Office Service Worker as authorized by Section VIII, Paragraph H-4 of the Personnel Handbook. BACKGROUND: • The City Council authorized the appointment of Lynette Walsh to the position of probationary Office Service Worker effective June 3, 1999. Ms. Walsh has performed the responsibilities of the position in a satisfactory manner over the past six months. ACTION REQUESTED: Acknowledge the satisfactory completion of probation and authorize the retention of Lynette Walsh as an Office Service Worker effective December 3, 1999. 1/014 --/ U ;144/91 lSr . S, CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum c a N 5 e ^I "I TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SUBJECT: 2000 Fee Schedule DATE: December 9, 1999 INTRODUCTION The City Council is asked to consider adopting the attached resolution setting fees for licenses, permits, services, and documents for 2000. BACKGROUND Prior to the end of each year, the City Council adopts a fee resolution for the ensuing year. The fee resolution includes the fees for all licenses and permits issued within the City of Shakopee. Department heads are asked to re-examine their fees and make appropriate recommendations for adjustments to the City Council. In the proposed resolution, the stricken language is deleted and the underlined language is inserted. City. Clerk - recommends adding a $150 fee for application and investigation for Off Sale and On Sale Beer Licenses, and a $55 initial Tobacco License investigation fee (pages 2 and 3) . Refuse Collection Rates are being moved from the Public Works to City Clerk (page 3) . Building Department - recommends increasing building permit fees for Certificate of Occupancy from $500 to $750 and moving permits from $50 to $100 (page 7) . Also adding a reroofing permit to be 1% of the contract amount, with $50 minimum fee. The SAC charge is being increased from $1,050/unit to $1,100/unit (page 8) . This ( is dictated by the Metropolitan Council. Finance Department - the City sewer area charge (SAC) is being raised from $410 to $420, the VIP connection charge should be changed from $712.08 to $770.83 and the VIP II connection charge should be changed from $268.58 to $290.74 (page 8) . The sewer service charges for monthly reduced from $7.00 to $6.50 and the charge for unmetered accounts from $15.70 to $15.20 (page 9) . See attached memo from the Finance Director. Police Department - recommends adding a fee for private vendor requests for State Accident Reports of $15.00 (weekly) and $40.00 (monthly) . Also changing Computer Researched Reports to a $5.00 plus hourly wage of individual doing research; and, decreasing the fees for taped audio and video statements (bringing the fees in line with area police departments. (page 9) . Public Works - recommends the deletion of certain equipment rentals where the items are no longer available for rent (page 10 and 11) . Planning Department - recommends decreasing an application to appeal an administrative decision (page 12) , relocating agendas and minutes to the City Clerk section, and adding language to the Environmental Review section (Page 13) . Before making recommendations for the park dedication fees, the Community Development Director would like to do some additional research. Engineering Department - recommends increasing the storm water drainage utility, the trunk storm water charges, and trunk storm water storage and treatment charges by 2.3% per ENR cost price index (page 15) ; increasing the trunk sanitary sewer charge to $1,485 per development acre (page 16) ; and increasing the permit to work in a r- o-w from $40.00 to $75.00 (page 16) and lot corner field search from $25 to $50 (page 16) . Increasing City's standard specification from $35 to $50 (page 15) . The Park and Recreation Department - recommends changing the pool admission rate from $3.50 to $4.00 for adults, the ice arena fee should read $55 - $140 per hour and the golf cage rental should read $3.75 per 30 minutes instead of 15 minutes. ALTERNATIVES 1. Adopt fee resolution as proposed. 2. Amend fee resolution as drafted. 3. Table for additional information. RECOMMENDED ACTION - after making any desired changes: Offer Resolution No. 5293, A Resolution Setting Fees for City Licenses, Permits, Services and Documents, and move its adoption. 1,44;44. J • S. Co , C'ty Clerk I:\clerk\judy\feereememo CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director SUBJ: 2000 Fee Schedule DATE: December 17, 1999 Included in the fee schedule changes are rate adjustments for the Storm and Sewer Funds. The city' s operational costs for the two funds is similar to 1999 . The capital expenditures for the funds were reviewed with the Capital Improvement Plan. Sewer Pending further information and experience with Rahr decreasing it ' s flow, it is recommended to not change the flow charge for sewer. The flow charge is $1 . 74 per thousand gallons, the same as 1998 and 1999 . There is a net loss in revenue from Rahr decreasing its flow. It is however, recommended to decrease the monthly base charge from $7 . 00 per month to $6 .50 per month. Metropolitan Council is lowering the treatment charge from $1, 257 per million gallons to $1, 200 per million gallons for a decrease of 4 . 5% . Last year their rate decreased 6 . 9% . The difference in their rate and our rate is to provide funding for some of the city costs involved and because the flow the city bill out is always smaller than the flow that Met . Council bills the city due to inflow/infiltration and unknown/unauthorized use of the sanitary sewer system. Storm The situation for storm drainage is the same as last year. The fund is below the minimum desired cash level . The rate for storm drainage could use a 10% increase to build up the balance in cash, however, like last year a smaller increase of 4% is recommended. Growth in accounts is helping to increase the cash balance. Trunk Fees The trunk fees for both funds are the amounts proposed by the Public Works Director. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 5293 A RESOLUTION SETTING FEES FOR CITY LICENSES, PERMITS, SERVICES AND DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, that the Fee Schedule dated January 1, 2000, attached hereto and made a part hereof is hereby approved and adopted in its entirety. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Fee Schedule attached shall become effective on January 1, 2000, unless indicated otherwise therein, and Resolution No. 4801 and all other resolutions inconsistent herewith shall be repealed effective January 1, 1999 . Adopted in Adjourned Regular Session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 21st day of December , 1999 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Adopted: Dec . 21, 1999 Res . No. FEE SCHEDULE Shakopee, Minnesota January 1, 2000 Fees are listed by department and are to be updated annually. CITY CLERK/Misc. Business Licenses FEES Commercial/Industrial/Mortgage Revenue Bond Fees 1 . Application fee for Commercial/Industrial/ 1/10th of 1% of Mortgage Revenue Bonds amount issued with a $2, 600 min\$6, 300 max. 2 . Legal expenses as billed in addition to above 3 . Application fee for refinancing Commercial/ 1/20th of 1% of Industrial/Mortgage Revenue Bonds amount issued with a $1, 300 min\$3 , 150 max. 4 . Legal expenses for refinancing as billed in addition to above Tax Increment Financing Fees (Authorized by Res. 3221) Application fee for Tax Increment Financing $5, 200 . 00 Movies and Theaters (Authorized by City Code 6 .42) 1 . Annual fee for showing 16 mm films $ 28 . 00 2 . Annual fee for showing 35 mm films (or larger $110 . 00 3 . Annual fee for conducting theatrical play(s) $ 28 . 00 Currency Exchange License Review State Law requires the City to review an application to the State for a currency exchange license. $ 40 . 00 Gambling/Bingo/Raffles Licensed through State Gambling Board, no City fees . Minnesota Home Finance Agency Rental Rehab Grant Application Fees (Authorized by Res . #3181) 1-4 Units $150 . 00 5-8 Units 185 . 00 - 290 . 00 9-16 Units 325 . 00 - 570 . 00 17-24 Units 605 . 00 - 850 . 00 25 or more 885 . 00 plus $35 for each unit in excess of 25 / License for the Sale of Beer, Liquor, Wine, Set-up License, Liquor License, Club License and Temporary Beer License (Authorized by City Code 5 . 06) 1 . Annual fee for On Sale Beer License $312 . 00 2 . Annual fee for Off Sale Beer License $100 . 00 3 . Temporary Beer and Liquor License $ 15 . 00 4 . Annual fee for Set Up License $125 . 00 5 . Annual fee for On Sale Wine License 1/2 of On Sale Liquor or $2, 000 whichever is less 6 . Annual fee for On Sale Club License $300 . 00 7. Annual fee for Sunday Liquor License $200 . 00 8 . Annual fee for Off Sale Liquor License $150 . 00 9 . Application and Investigation fee for Off Sale Liquor License, On Sale Liquor License, or Wine License a) If investigation within Minn. $330 . 00 b) If investigation outside Minn. City expenses up to $10, 000 with $1, 100 deposit 10 . Application and Investigation fee for Off Sale and On Sale Beer Licenses $150 . 00 11 . Annual fee for On Sale Liquor License: Customer Used Floor Area Under 1, 000 $3 , 705 . 00 1, 000 - 1, 999 $4, 390 . 00 2, 000 - 2, 999 $5, 080 . 00 3, 000 - 3, 999 $5, 765 . 00 4, 000 - 4, 999 $6, 445 . 00 5, 000 - 5, 999 $7, 140 . 00 6, 000 - 6, 999 $7, 820 . 00 7, 000 - 7, 999 , $8, 510 . 00 8, 000 - 8, 999 $9, 195 . 00 9, 000 - 9, 999 $9, 875 . 00 Over 10, 000 $10, 570 . 00 Fireworks Permit Application fee hereby set as follows : $20 . 00 Peddlers (Authorized by City Code 6 . 21) 1 . Weekly License Fee $30 . 00 2 . Annual License Fee $160 . 00 3 . Six Month License Fee $105 . 00 Taxicabs and Drivers (Authorized by City Code 6 . 22) 1 . Annual fee $275 . 00 2 . Annual taxicab driver' s license fee $ 35 . 00 3 . Annual fee for each vehicle $ 16 . 00 02 Tobacco (Authorized by City Code 6 .23) 1 . Annual fee for Tobacco License $175 . 00 2 . Initial license requires one time investigation fee $ 55 . 00 Show, Non-Transient Theme Parks, Amusement Parks, etc . (Authorized by City Code 6 . 24) 1 . Annual license fee equaling the number of rides x $50 . 00 $50 . 00/ride 2 . Show without rides $80 . 00 3 . Non-Transient Theme Parks As per agreement Outdoor Performance Center (Authorized by City Code 6 .42B) 1 . Annual license fee $520 . 00 Massage Center (Authorized by City Code 6 .40) 1 . Annual License Fee $315 . 00 $150 . 00 (Includes one massage therapist) 2 . Initial license requires one time investigation fee $345 . 00 $150 . 00 3 . Investigation fee for each new employee $ 55 . 00 Masseur and Masseuse License Fee (Authorized by City Code 6 .41) 1 . Annual registration fee $110 . 00 2 . Investigation fee $ 55 . 00 Pawnshops, Precious Metal Dealers, and Secondhand Dealers (authorized by City Code 6 .28) 1 . Annual License Fee $315 . 00 2 . Initial license requires one time investigation fee $345 . 00 3 . Investigation fee for each new employee $ 55 . 00 4 . Pawn Shop billable transaction fee $ 1. 50 Tattooing License (authorized by City Code 6 . 51) 1 . Annual License Fee $315 . 00 2 . Initial license requires one time investigation fee $345 . 00 3 . Investigation fee for each new employee $ 55 . 00 Refuse Collection Rates (Authorized by City Code 3 . 15) 1 . Annual fee for Refuse Collection License $110 . 00 3 Copies of Agenda/Minutes (Annual) 1 . City Council Agenda $15 . 00 2 . Planning Commission Agenda $15 . 00 3 . City Council Minutes $35 . 00 4 . Planning Commission Minutes $35 . 00 BUILDING INSPECTOR/ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR City of Shakopee electrical inspection fees shall be paid according to the schedule contained in the current State Board of Electricity - State of Minnesota - Laws and Rules Regulating Licensing of Electricians and Inspection of Electricl Installations " . With the following exception: 1 . The fee for single family dwellings shall be calculated by service size and number of circuits according to the State Fee Schedule subpart 3 and subpart 4, with a maximum fee of $110 . 00 for 0-200 amp service and $165 . 00 for 200-400 amp service. Plumbing Permits (Authorized by City Code 4 . 05) 1 . Alterations and Repairs - Minimum Fee $20 . 00 + $ . 50 State Surcharge Tax 2 . New Construction Residential - Minimum Fee $36 . 00 + $ . 50 State Surcharge Tax Commercial - Minimum Fee $60 . 00 + $ . 50 State Surcharge Tax 3 . Residential Plumbing Permit Fees All fixtures listed below will be figured at $6 . 00/each Water Closet Water Softener +$ . 50 State Lavatory (Basin) Bathtub Surcharge Tax Floor Drain Laundry Tub Sink Shower Stall Disposal Dishwasher Water Heater (Gas or Electric) Clothes Washer-Standpipe Permit fees for rough-ins for future bathrooms will be $5 . 00 per fixture. + $ . 50 State Surcharge Tax 4 . Residential - Replacements Only Water Heater - Gas $20 . 00 +$ . 50 State Surcharge Fee Water Softeners - New or replacement in other than homes under construction (installer must be licensed by the State Board of Health $20 . 00 + $ . 50 State Surcharge Fee 5 . Commercial Plumbing Permit Fees Water Closet, Lavatory (Basin) , Urinal, Individual Shower $ 7 . 00 Shower - Gang Type - Per Head 5 . 20 Drinking Fountain 7 . 00 Dental Unit 13 . 00 Sink - Service or Mop 7 . 00 Flat rim, bar, counter, laboratory 9 . 50 Pot or Skullery 9 . 50 Clothes Washer - First five units or less 19 . 00 Each additional unit 4 . 00 Floor Drain - 2 inch 7 . 00 3 and 4 inch 8 . 50 Catch Basin 9 . 50 Sewage Ejector 13 . 00 Sumps and Receiving Tanks 13 . 00 Water Softeners 19 . 00 Water Heater - Gas - Replacement Only 25 . 00 Commercial plumbing permits to be figured by the above fixture schedule but at the same time the permit is to be issued, the permitee will certify the contract price and the fee will be based on the above method or 1 .27% of the contract price, whichever is greater. 6 . Sewer and Water Connection - Residential Sewer Connection $ 20 . 00 +$ . 50 State Surcharge Fee Water Connection $20 . 00 +$ . 50 State Surcharge Fee Combination Sewer & Water Connection $30 . 00 +$ . 50 State Surcharge Fee 7. Sewer and Water Connection - Commercial/Industrial 1 . 27% of the contract price. Building Permit Fees (Authorized by City Code 4 . 05) Building Value Fees $1 . 00 to 500 . 00 $23 . 50 501 . 00 to 2, 000 . 00 $23 . 50 for the first $500 . 00 plus $3 . 05 for each additional $100 . 00 or fraction thereof, including $2, 000 . 00 2, 001 . 00 to 25, 000 . 00 $69 . 25 for the first $2, 000 . 00 plus $14 . 00 for each additional $1, 000 . 00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25, 000 . 00 S 25, 001 . 00 to 50, 000 . 00 $391 .25 for the first $25, 000 . 00 plus $10 . 10 for each additional $1, 000 . 00 or fraction thereof, to and including 50, 000 . 00 50, 001. 00 to 100, 000 . 00 $643 . 75 for the first $50, 000 . 00 plus $7. 00 for each additional $1, 000 . 00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100, 000 . 00 100, 001. 00 to 500, 000 . 00 $993 . 75 for the first $100, 000 . 00 plus $5 . 60 for each additional $1, 000 . 00 or fraction thereof, to and including $500, 000 . 00 500, 001 . 00 to 1, 000, 000 . 00 $3, 233 . 75 for the first $500, 000 . 00 plus $4 . 75 for each additional $1, 000 . 00 or fraction thereof, to and including $1, 000, 000 . 00 1, 000, 001. 00 and up $5, 608 .75 for the first $1, 000, 000 . 00 plus $3 . 65 for each additional $1, 000 . 00 or fraction thereof Other Inspections and Fees: Inspections outside of normal business hours (minimum charge - two hours) $47 . 00/hr. * Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of Section 305 . 8 of the Uniform Building Code $47 . 00/hr. * Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated (minimum charge - one-half hour) $47 . 00/hr. * Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved plans (minimum charge - one-half hour) $47 . 00/hr. * For use of outside consultants for plan checking and insepctions, or both Actual costs** * Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest . This cost shall include supervision, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. ** Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs . Plan Review Fee: 65% of building permit fee under provisions of Section 107 of the Unform Building Code. State Surcharge : Building Permits (These fees forwarded to the State Treasurer) Less than $1, 000 $ . 50 $1, 000, 000 or less . 0005 x valuation $1, 000, 000 to $2, 000, 000 $ 500 + . 0004 x (Value - $1, 000, 000) $2, 000, 000 to $3 , 000, 000 $ 900 + . 0003 x (Value - $2, 000, 000) $3, 000, 000 to $4, 000, 000 $1200 + . 0002 x (Value - $3, 000, 000) $4, 000, 000 to $5, 000, 000 $1400 + . 0001 x (Value - $4, 000, 000) Greater than $5, 000, 000 $1500 + . 00005 x (Value - $5, 000, 000) State Surcharge: Plumbing, Heating and Electrical Permits Permit fee less than $1, 000 $ . 50 Permit fee more than $1, 000 Fee x . 0005 Certificate of Occupancy (Authorized by Res . No. 2604) Commercial/Industrial - . 005 times the value of the project, or $500 . 00, whichever is greater Residential - . 005 times the value of the project with a $500 . 00 $750 . 00 maximum 90% of the fee shall be refunded when a final certificate of occupancy is issued. Fast Tracking Issuance of Building Permits (Authorized by Res. #2604) Fast tracking building permit process - City expenses up to 100% of building permit fee with a 30% deposit Moving Permit $50 . 00 $100 . 00 Fire Protection Equipment hereby set as follows : New construction, repair and miscellaneous work shall be computed at 1 .27% of the contract price plus State Surcharge. Individual On Site Sewer Permits hereby set as follows : Residential : $50 . 00 Commercial : 1 . 27% of Contract Amount Reroofing Permit 1% of contract amount, with $50 . 00 minimum fee. Heating, Air Conditioning, Refrigeration, and Ventilation Permits hereby set as follows : Minimum Fee $20 . 00 + $ . 50 State Surcharge Single Family Residence $40 . 00 + $ . 50 State Surcharge Central Air Conditioning (at the time $ 6 . 00 of new construction) + $ . 50 State Surcharge Fireplace - Includes Gas Permit $40 . 00 + $ . 50 State Surcharge (Included with new single family residence above) 7 Commercial fee shall be computed at 1 .27% of the contract plus State Surcharge. Tank & Piping Permits hereby set as follows : Underground fuel storage tanks and piping permit fee to be 1 .27% of contract plus State Surcharge. Lawn Sprinkler Systems - Residential $30 . 00 Lawn Sprinkler Systems - Commercial (This fee includes water connection from building piping to yard side of siphon breaker) $30 . 00 Gas Pipinq Permits hereby set as follows : Minimum Fee $20 . 00 + $ . 50 State Surcharge Residential - Each fixture or applicance $ 5 . 00 + $ . 50 State Surcharge Alterations and Repairs - Minimum Fee Commercial fee shall be computed at 1.27% of the contract plus State Surcharge. Appeal Fees Appeal to Building Code Board of Adjustment & Appeals $90 . 00 Appeal to Housing Advisory and Appeals Board $90 . 00 Appeal to City Council $90 . 00 Sanitary Sewer Service Availability Charge (SAC) Units for Various Residential, Commercial, Public, and Institutional Facilities will be applied as specified in the Metropolitan Council SAC Procedure Manual, latest edition. Metro SAC Charge (these funds are forwarded to the Metropolitan Council) $1, 050 $1100 City SAC Charge per Resolution No. 4165 $ 410 $ 420/Unit TOTAL $1, 520/Unit Water Availability Charge (WAC) (These fees forwarded to SPUC) Fees are set by Shakopee Public Utilities resolution. VIP connection charge to the benefited area for the first phase of phase of the VIP sewer project - per arce $71.2-0.8 $770 . 83 VIP II connection charge to the benefited area for the second phase of the VIP sewer project - per acre $2268-58 $290 . 74 ADMINISTRATION/FINANCE - hereby set as follows: Office Charges hereby set as follows : 1 . Assessment Searches $15 . 00 2 . Partial Release of Developers Agreement $15 . 00 3 . Photo Copy fee General Public $ .20 Other governmental/non-profit public service $ . 07 4 . Complete or Partial Assessment Rolls or other Assessment Reports $25 . 00 per report plus $5 . 00 shipping if applicable 5 . Service charge for each check returned $ 20 . 00 6 . Splitting special assessments when permitted instead of pay off $600 . 00 7. Fee for processing a replacement payroll check $ 20 . 00 To be waived if employee immediately signs up for direct deposit . 8 . Interest on past due invoices . . 1 .5% Sewer Service Charges (Authorized by City Code 3 . 02) 1 . Monthly service charge $7 . 00 $6 . 50 2 . For every 1, 000 gallons or part thereof of metered flow or water usage $1 . 74 3 . Charge for unmetered residential water accounts or new accounts $15 . 70 $15 . 20 POLICE/FIRE Report Copies hereby set as follows : 1. Up to 2 pages $5 . 00 2 . 3 and over pages $ . 25/ea. 3 . Taped Statements (audio) $15 . 00 $10 . 00 4 . Taped Statements (video) $35 . 00 $30 . 00 5 . State Accident Reports $ 5 . 00 6 . Drivers License Printout $ 5 . 00 7 . Computer Researched Reports 35 . 00 lot hour $5 . 00 & hourly wage of individual doing research (docs not include duplication costs) $20 . 00 for every hour ther after 8 . Private Vendor request for copies of State Accident Reports Weekly $15 . 00 Monthly $40 . 00 8 . Police Reports from City Attorney $10 . 00- 9 . 10 . 049 . Permit to carry handgun in public-background check $10 . 00 10 . Pawn Shop billable transaction fee $ 1 . 50 11 . Hourly rate for contracted police services $ 46 . 00 Towing and Impounding of Vehicles hereby set as follows : Towing and impounding is done by a private contractor having appropriate impounding facilities. Fees are set by contractor. Dog Licenses, Impounding Fees, etc. (Authorized by City Code 10 . 21) 1 . Dog Licenses (good for the life of the dog) $10 . 00 2 . Duplicate license $ 2 . 00 3 . First impoundment $20 . 00 4 . Second impoundment $50 . 00 1 5 . Third and successive impoundment within a 12-month period $100 . 00 6 . Amount charged per day when confined to the Pound $10 . 00 7 . In the case of an unlicensed dog or a dog for whom proof of a current rabies vaccination cannot be shown, there shall be an additional penalty of $10 . 00 . (Owner is responsible to furnish proof of license and/or rabies vaccination) . 8 . Large animal impoundment $35 . 00 9 . Large animal board per day $15 . 00 Large animals are defined as animals other than household pets ie; horses, cows, sheep. PUBLIC WORKS Equipment Rental hereby set as follows : (Minimum Rental Time 1 Hour. All drivable equipment rates include operator) Caterpiller Grader (private) $92 .50/hour Front end loader (Fiat-Allis) private $95 . 00/hour Front end loader (Case) private $95 . 00/hour Elgin street sweeper $86 . 00/hour Elgin swccper (Statc contract twicc/yr) $62 . 00/hour Roscue Side Broom $47 . 00/hour 2-1/2 ton dump truck (single) $58 . 00/hour 2-1/2 ton dump truck w/plow $75 . 00/hour 3/4 1 ton pickups (w/plow add 10 . 00) $47 . 00/hour Water tanker/flusher $52 . 00/hour Trash compactor $40 . 50/hour Mower tractor (turf type) Contract Rates Weed Mowing (rough) Contract Rates Asphalt roller (1-1/2 ton) $24 . 00/hour Bobcat $58 . 00/hour Raygo Gehl alley grader $41 . 50/hour Wood Chipper $47 . 00/hour IO Sign replacement/installation $110 . 00/sign (w/o post less $10 . 00) Street sign installation in new subdivisions (per each sign pole) $270 . 00 Traffic Control Signs in new subdivisions $110 per sign Vidco ocwcro (w/caaacttc add $20 . 00/tach) $106 . 00/hour Sewer jet cleaning $106 . 00/hour Vacuum Inductor $ 79 . 00/hour Barricades w/flashers $10 . 00/barricade/day Barricades w/o flashers $8 . 00/barricade/day Cones $2 . 00/cone/day Bituminous Street Repair Time and material basis only Asphalt or Cold Mix $35 . 00/ton PLANNING - hereby set as follows: I . INFORMATION/DOCUMENT FEES A. Long Range Planning Documents 1 . Comprehensive Plan $100 . 00 2 . 1995-1999 Capital Improvement Program $20 . 00 B. City Codes 1 . Chapter 11 Zoning Ordinance $25 . 00 2 . Chapter 12 Subdivision Regulations $10 . 00 $6 . 00 3 . City Code $100 . 00 C. Agcnda/Minutcs (Annual) 1 . City Council Agcnda $15 . 00 2 . Planning Commission Agcnda $15 . 00 3 . City Council Minutcs $35 . 00 1 . Planning Commiaaion Minutco $35 . 00 D. Maps 1 . City Map (small) $ 1 . 00 2 . City Map (large) $ 3 . 00 3 . Zoning (22"x34" ) $ 3 . 00 4 . Any Printed Maps (blueprint) 50/sq. ft . E. Services 1 . Zoning Verification Letter $25 . 00 /1 F. Recording Fees 1 . Document recording fees with County $1 . 00/page $15 . 00/min + $ 4 . 50 Surcharge G. Sign Permit Fees (Authorized by City Code 4 . 30) Permanent $30 + $ . 50/sq. ft Temporary $25 . 00 II . LAND DIVISION ADMINISTRATION FEES A. Major Subdivisions 1 . Preliminary Plat $330 + $6/lot or $200 + $4/acre, whichever is greater 2 . Preliminary & Final Plat Concurrently Preliminary fee plus final fee 3 . Final Plat $150 . 00 4 . Title Review Fee $100 . 00 B. Minor Subdivisions 1 . Lot Division/Lot Reassembly $100 . 00 2 . Registered Land Surveys $100 . 00 C. Vacations 1 . Vacations of Public Easements $100 . 00 2 . Vacations of Rights-of-Way $200 . 00 D. Park Dedication Fees (Authorized by City Code Sec . 12) Cash in lieu of land dedication fees - Residential Single-family/Duplex Units $1, 200 . 00 per unit Multi-family/Apartment Units $1, 000 . 00 per unit Commercial/Industrial Property $3 , 880 . 00 per acre E. Wetlands 1. Certificate of Exemption review process. $ 75 . 00 III . LAND USE ADMINISTRATION FEES A. Application for Appeal of City Administration Decision 1 . Appeal to Board of Adjustment and Appeals $100 . 00 $50 . 00 2 . Appeal to City Council $100 . 00 $50 . 00 B. Application for Variances 1 . Single Family Residential $ 85 . 00 2 . All others $150 . 00 3 . Appeal to City Council $100 . 00 l� C. Application for Conditional Use Permit 1. Home Occupations $200 . 00 2 . Home Occupation Renewals and Amendments $200 . 00 3 . CUP for Over-Height Fence $200 . 00 4 . All Other Conditional Use Permits $200 . 00 5 . All Other Renewals and Amendments $200 . 00 6 . Appeal to City Council $100 . 00 7 . Mineral Extraction & Land Rehabilitation Permit $200 . 00 + $2, 500 cash deposit * +all administrative costs ** + all consultant fees *** D. Application for Planned Unit Development 1 . Planned Unit Development Concept Review $100 . 00 Determinations by the BOAA $100 . 00 2 . Planned Unit Development $700 . 00 +$35 . 00/acre + $1, 000 cash deposit * +all administrative costs ** + all consultant fees *** 3 . Amendment to Planned Unit Development $300 . 00 + $1, 000 cash deposit * +all administrative costs ** + all consultant fees *** C. Application for Environmental Review - the project proponent will be required to sign an agreement to reimbursement the entire and actual cost of conduction an environmental review. 1 . Discretionary Environmental Assessment Worksheet No fee 2 . Required Environmental Assessment Worksheet $1, 000 . 00 3 . Required Environmental Impact Statement $4, 000 . 00 D. Zoning Ordinance Amendments 1 . Map Amendments Less than 2 .5 acres $250 . 00 Greater than 2 . 5 acres $500 . 00 2 . Text Amendments $500 . 00 E. Additional Notices - Applies to all types of applications 1 . Rezoning Applications : Per Published Notice, in excess one published notices for each of two hearings $ 25 . 00 Per Mailed Notice, in excess of 100 notices for each of two hearings $ 1 . 50 2 . All Other Applications Per Published Notice, in excess one published notice for one hearing $ 25 . 00 Per Mailed Notice, in excess of 100 notices for one hearing $ 1 . 50 /3 NOTES FOR THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEE SCHEDULE * Cash Deposits - Actions requiring cash deposits must be paid at the time of the application submittal . Cash deposits are held by the City to ensure adequate payment . A bill for the appropriate costs will be sent to the applicant and if not paid will be obtained from the cash deposit . The City Administrator has the right to amend the cash deposit requirements. Deposits will be place in escrow. ** Administrative Costs - Actions requiring payment for administrative costs may be billed to the applicant . Administrative costs may include but are not limited to the following: staff time, publishing costs, copying, printing and mailing. Department Fees Community Dev. Director $55 . 00/Hour Planner II $40 . 00/Hour Planner I $35 . 00/Hour Community Dev. Secretary $25 . 00/Hour Planning Technician $30 . 00/Hour *** Consultant Fees - Consultants may be required by the City to review development proposals including but not limited to traffic and water management issues . Consultant fees will be based upon a prior written proposal and agreement . Fees will be placed in escrow. ENGINEERING - hereby set as follows: Engineering Fees Department fees for Improvement Projects A. Private Developments The estimated construction costs for projects shall include, but are not limited to the following:utility construction including sanitary sewer, storm sewer and watermain; street construction including site grading and erosion control, sidewalks, boulevard trees and other appurtenances . The Development Fees include a lump sum of 5 1/2% of the estimated construction costs for site grading and erosion control and a lump sum of 8 1/2% for the remaining improvements listed above for the project using the following breakdown: REMAINING PUBLIC GRADING & EROSION FEE IMPROVEMENT FEE Plan Review & Administrave Fee-1 . 5% Administrative Fee - 1 . 5% Inspection Fee -4 . 0% Plan Review Fee - 2 . 5% TOTAL -5 . 5% Inspection Fee - 4 . 5% TOTAL - 8 . 5% Any direct costs incurred, such as material testing, are not included and will be billed back directly to the developer. SPUC inspection services are not included in this fee. B. City Projects The actual hourly rates of the employees will be used plus a multiplier of 2 . 5 for benefits, overhead, etc. A 1% project administration fee will be charged to all projects. C. Miscellaneous Engineering Work same as the City projects . D. City of Shakopee ' s Standard Specifications $35 . 00 $50 . 00/per copy. Other costs incurred will be added in using the actual costs (i.e. consultants fees, testing laboratories, etc. ) Grading Permits - Grading permit fees shall equal 5 . 5% of the estimated construction cost to perform the grading and erosion control work. Wetland Conservation Act Administration 1 . Certificate of Exemption $75 . 00 2 . Replacement Plan $75 . 00 plus hourly Storm Water Drainage Utility City-wide Fee $21 . 81 $22 . 71 per REF* acre/Qtr. *Residential equivalent factor Administrative Fee for Delinquent Accounts Certification $10 . 00 Flood Plain Verification $10 . 00 Trunk Storm Water Charges Charge of $ . 075 $ . 077 per developable square foot . The term —net developable acre " means the total acreage of a development within the city limits minus the portion of the development used for public right-of-way, lakes, wetland areas, storm water ponds and parks . Trunk Storm Water Storage and Treatment Charges : For any development that utilizes regional ponding systems, the storm water storage and treatment charge is as follows : $ . 012 $ . 043per sq. foot for a development having 3 or less lots per acre; $ . 075 $ . 077 per sq. foot for a development haivng more than 3 lots per acre; $ . 138 $ . 141 per sq. foot for a commercial, industrial, or institutional dev. /� Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge 1996 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge - $1, 319 . 74 per development acre. 1997 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge - $1, 360 per development acre. 1998 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge - $1,414 . 00 per development acre. 1999 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge - $1, 452 . 00 per development acre. 2000 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge - $1,485 . 00 per development acre as per Trunk Sanitary Sewer Policy. Permit to Work in Public Right-of-Way fees set as follows : Permit to work in public right-of-way -first inspection, $'10 . 00$75 . 00 plan review, administration and other multiple inspections - hourly rates When work in public right-of-way requires the submittal of plans and specifications, review of the plans shall be charged in accordance with the hourly fees approved for the Engineering Dept . Lot Corner Field Search (w/metal detector only) $25 . 00 $50 . 00 (non-refundable, no guarantees) This is not a legal survey or any verification that lot corners found are in the correct location, but simply an attempt to locate any existing lot corners that are in the ground. Topographic Maps Hard Copy Map & Electronic File $12 . 00/Acre Plus $40 . 00/Hour Rate for Computer File Processing Computer/Plotter Generated Maps $60 . 00/Hour with a Minimum 15 Minute Charge Street Index Maps $5 . 00 per Map PARKS AND RECREATION - hereby set as follows: METHODOLOGY FOR SETTING FEES The Parks and Recreation Department uses a variety of methods and strategies for determining fees. For instance, participants of seasonal sports programs are charged a Recreation Activity Fee. Each participant is assessed a flat fee which is paid directly to the City to cover administrative costs. The Merit Services approach classifies activities into three categories: Low (fees covers only 50% of direct costs), Medium (breakeven or 100% of direct costs) and Partial Overhead Pricing (recovers all direct costs and a portion of administrative costs:110-150% of indiredt costs). In some cases, staff uses the Market Place approach (what others are charging). RECREATION ACTIVITY FEE The Recreation Activity Fee is intended to recover a portion of the administrative cost associated with providing recreation services. The fee is assessed mainly to seasonal activities such as youth and adult sports programs. The current fee for a seasonal youth sports program is $16 and $23 for adult sports programs. Youth Activities Football, Basketball, Ski Club, Baseball, Softball, Wrestling, Baseball and Softball. $16 per participant. Adult Activities Adult teams have the option to pay the "Base Rate" (i.e. $322 softball) or the individual activity fee which is $23 per player. The non-resident fee is also assessed to those teams with players from other comunities. Team Base Rate Adult Softball $322 (14 player roster) Adult Basketball $184 (8 player roster) Adult Volleyball $184 (8 player roster) Church League Softball.. $ 25 Adult Baseball $322 (14 player roster) Legion Baseball $322 Over 35 Baseball $322 NON-RESIDENT FEE The non-resident fee: Youth $11, Adult $21. The non-resident fee for Jackson Township residents is $21 for those 16 years of age or older. The township subsidizes the non-resident fee for partcipants 15 and under. The non-resident fee Louisville Township residents is $11 for youth and adults. The township subsidizes $10 (per activity) of the non-resident fee for its residents. Prior Lake residents who live in the Shakopee School District are charged a $5 non-resident fee. MERIT FEES Another method for determining fees is using the Merit Services approach. This involves the classification of activities into three categories: Low Fee, Medium Fee and Partial Overhead Pricing. Low Fee-A fee is set to recover 50% of the direct costs of an activity. i.e. playground, special events, open skating arts & crafts. Medium Fee-the objective is to recover 100% of the direct costs of an activity. The idea is to recover the costs of instructors and supplies. i.e. swimming lessons. Partial Overhead Pricing- is a method most commonly used in our programs. This is a method which establishes a price which covers all direct costs and a portion of the administrative costs or fixed costs. i.e. aerobic exercise classes, gymnastics, t-ball, KIDS, trips and tours etc. Low Fee Medium Fee Partial Overhead Pricing Playground events($1) Cheerleading($20-25)Golf LessonsAduitNouth($35/25) Special Events($2-3) Volleyballl($20) Day Camp($56) Shakopee Showcase (5-40) Jr. Team Tennis($37)T-Ball/Nearball($28) Track& Field Meets($1) Dog/Puppy Obedience($35) KIDS/Tot-Time\($28/16) Teen Broomball($2) Trips(admission+transportation) Archery($21) 100/500 Mile Club($10) Gymnastics($5.00-per hour) Tennis Lessons Aduitnrouth($25) Fall Softball($260) Co-Rec Volleyball($70) Aerobics($2) Youth Camps($10) 3 on 3 Basketball League($25) PICNIC FACILITIES Shelter Rental: Residents $35 Shelter Rental: Non-residents $60 KITS Volleyball $5 Horeshoes $5 MUNICIPAL SWIMMING POND FEES Gate Fees (includes pond and waterslide for the day) Adults & Children (2 and over) $ 0 $4.00 Seniors (60+) & Children under 2 FREE Season Tickets Family Pass: Resident./Jackson Township $60.00 Family Pass: Township (Dist. 720) $71.00 Family Pass: Non resident $82.00 Individual Pass: Resident/Jackson Township $37.00 Individual Pass: Township (Dist. 720) $49.00 Individual Pass: Non resident $59.00 Swimming Lessons Swimming Lessons Resident/Jackson Township. $ 25.00 Swimming Lessons Township (Dist. 720) $ 36.00 Swimming Lessons Non resident $46.00 SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY CENTER Memberships: Membership does not include admission to paid events or recreation sponsored programs. This includes aerobics, skating lessons, gymnastics, High School games, or any Tournaments. Membership Card: Adult 19 & over $ 70 Youth 6-18 or Seniors 60+ $ 50 Family $110 Punch Card: (20 admissions) Adult 19 & over $ 35 Youth 6-18 or Seniors 60+ $ 17 Daily Admission Adult 19 & Over $ 3.00 Youth 6-18 or Seniors 60+ $ 2.00 Children 5 and under FREE WALKING TRACK FREE (users must be 14 or accompanied by an adult ) COMMUNITY CENTER RENTAL FEES SCHEDULE Meeting rooms(graduating scale)$25 first hour,$20 for hours 2-5 and$10 for hours 5-10 Gymnastics/Aerobics Studio(graduating scale))$25 first hour,$20 for hours 2-5 and$10 for hours 5-10 IS Multi-Meeting Room(graduating scale)$25 first hour,$20 for hours 2-5 and$10 for hours 5-10 Gymnasium(graduating scale)$25 first hour,$20 for hours 2-5 and$10 for hours 5-10 Ice Arena $55-$120$140 per hour Photo copying $.20 per page EQUIPMENT RENTALS(Daily Rates) VCR/Monitor $5 Coffee Maker $5 Wrestling Mats $50 Golf Cage $3.75 per-14 30 minutes. Locker rental $35 per year OUTDOOR ATHLETIC FIELD RENTAL FEE SCHEDULE These rates are applied to events held on City property and school property maintained by the City. Ball field(one day): $25 per field Ball field(two days): $35per field Ball field(three days): $45 per field Concession stand: $50 per day,plus a$50 cleaning/damage deposit Ball fields w/lights: $40 per night,per field Canopy Tent $30 per day Youth Building Rental $100 . 00 OTHER - hereby set as follows : 1 . Application fee for variance from or amendment to the cable franchise ordinance 25 . 00 PLUS Costs of consultants hired to assist the City in considering variance applications will be billed to applicant based on actual cost to the City. Notification will be sent to applicant that consultants will be utilized when that determina- tion has been made. ltri 15.E. S CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: 15.E.5.—Park Dedication Fees DATE: December 21, 1999 Jon Albinson noted that the fee schedule changes for 2000 was incorrect, in that it did not include the changes in the park dedication fees for 2000,that had been approved earlier. In order to list all items in the fee schedule,the approval should include these modifications: 1999 2000 Single Family/Duplex Units $1,200 $1,500 Multi-Family/Apartment Units $1,000 $1,250 This is part of a phased in approach, which will see these increased by$300, and $250, respectively, again,next year. My thanks to Jon Albinson for pointing this out. Mark McNeill City Administrator MM:tw / 1E CONN SeivT CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director SUBJ: Fire Relief Contribution DATE: December 15, 1999 Introduction Council is asked to review the city contribution to the Fire Relief Association for 1999 . Background Each year the Fire Relief Association is required to file the needed city contribution with the City Clerk by August 1st . In August 1998, the certified contribution for 1999 was zero. Consequently, no funds were budgeted. In August 1999, a corrected form for 1999 was filed certifying an amount of $32, 973 . The certified amount for 2000 is $52, 060 . Alternatives 1. Pay the original certified amount of $0 . 00 2 . Pay the revised certified amount of $32, 973 . Recommendation Alternative 2 . Paying the original certified amount of $0 . 00 will result in prolonging the deficit condition of the Association funds. Future city contributions will be larger to recover the —lost " contribution for 1999. Action Offer Resolution No5299 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION No. 5036 ADOPTING THE 1999 BUDGET and move its adoption. Move to authorize the payment of $32, 973 to the Shakopee Fire Relief Association as per the August 1999 corrected certification for the 1999 budget year. U 1. G egg Voxland Finance Director N:\budget\99bud3 RESOLUTION No. 5299 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION No. 5036 ADOPTING THE 1999 BUDGET BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, COUNTY OF SCOTT, MINNESOTA, that the 1999 General Fund budget is amended as follows: Expenditures Division Amount Fire Department $ 32,973 Unallocated—Contingency (32,973) Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 21st day of December, 1999. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: - City Clerk 6.... c CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum C �� TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director SUBJ: 2000 Workers Compensation Insurance DATE: December 13, 1999 Introduction The Workers Compensation policy for the city is up for renewal . Background This is a routine item that the work comp policy for the city renews on January 1. The renewal is with the same terms as last year, namely with a $500 deductible on medical coverage. The deposit premium last year was $68, 320 and this year it is $72, 762 . Actual cost is based on the actual figures calculated after the end of the year. The League of Cities Insurance Trust has an excellent program. There is probably nothing in the market place that can compare to this program. Action Move to affirm the renewal of the workers compensation with the League of Cities Insurance Trust for a deposit premium of $72, 762 . Gregg Voxland Finance Director is\finance\docs\insure\workcomp CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Bids For Full Size Squad Car DATE: December 10, 1999 Introduction The 2000 Internal Service Fund budget contains an appropriation request for the purchase of three squad cars. Background The 2000 budget includes an appropriation of $94,000 for the purchase of 3 squad cars. Funding is from the Capital Equipment Internal Service Fund. The vendor cost last year was $22,326.00. The one new car will replace a 1996 model. Two cars are additions. Additional costs include graphics, communications conversion and other equipment. The bid for a full size car is as follows: 2000 Base bid $20,237.00 Options: Deck lid light wiring 40.00 Drivers cloth power seat 360.00 Vinyl rear seat 58.00 Full rubber floor mat 23.00 Left side spot light 151.00 Single key lock system 40.00 Extended Warranty 1,530.00 Shop manual (one) 145.00 Total 22,584.00 Alternatives 1. Buy as per above. 2. Buy as per above but modify options. 3. Rebid on our own. 4. Don't buy full size squads. Recommendation Alternative number 1. Action Move to authorize the purchase of three full size police squads from Superior Ford in the amount of $67,4620.00, in accordance with the State of Minnesota automobile contract #421921. EA) Gregg Voxland Finance Director C:\gregg\memo\00squad lS. t , ?I CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum -44 TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director SUBJ: Fixed Asset Capitalization Level DATE: December 15, 1999 Introduction and Background Currently the city records items generally costing $2, 000 or more and that last more than a year as fixed assets. With the passage of time, few assets purchased between $2, 000 and $5, 000, and in preparation for conversion of fixed assets to the new software in 2, 000, it is requested to raise the threshold to $5, 000 . This will match Council ' s requirement for obtaining quotes. The state level for obtaining quotes is $15, 000 . Alternatives 1 . Keep at $2, 000 . 2 . Raise to $5, 000 . 3 . Raise to another amount . Recommendation Alternative 2 . Action Move to set the capitalization threshold for fixed assets at $5, 000 . regg Voxland Finance Director C:\gregg\memo\quotes /S- lv CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director SUBJECT: Special Assessment Redistribution DATE: December 21, 1999 Introduction and Background The purchase of part of a MDOT property by the Scott County HRA, resulted in a need to redistribute the remaining assessment balances . The attached resolution accomplishes the redistribution. This is a housekeeping item. Parcel 27-047001-0 is the new HRA parcel, 27-047002-0 is the new MDOT parcel and 27-047003-0 and 27-047004-0 are deleted. Assessments are being combined on to the HRA parcel . Action Requested Offer Resolution No. 5300, A RESOLUTION REDISTRIBUTING ASSESSMENTS ON EVERGREEN HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT PARCEL, and move its adoption. i.� Gregg oxland Finance Director RESOLUTION NO. 5300 A RESOLUTION REDISTRIBUTING ASSESSMENTS ON EVERGREEN HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT PARCEL WHEREAS, on November 19, 1996, Resolution No. 4568 adopted by City Council levied assessments against properties benefited for County Road 16 Curb and Gutter,Project 1995-3. WHEREAS, the platting of Evergreen Heights Development changed the legal description of some parcels. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the 1999 payable remaining balances of assessments of$515.25 for PID 27-047001-0, $315.00 for 27-047002-0, $301.86 for 27-047003-0 and $301.86 for 27- 047004-0 are hereby redistributed in the total amount of$1,433.97 against PID 27-047001-0. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all other parts of Resolution No. 4568 shall continue in effect. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of the Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 21st day of December, 1999. Mayor of the City of Shakopee A IThST: City Clerk