The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11/09/1999 TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 9, 1999 LOCATION: 129 Holmes Street South Mayor Jon Brekke presiding 1] Roll Call at 6:00 p.m. 2] Approval of Agenda 3] Discussion of Budget Revenue Change (Voxland) 4] Discussion of Ordinance Regarding Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS) 5] Worksession: A] Residential Platting Moratorium Wrap-Up B] Draft Revised Comprehensive Plan 6] Other Business 7] Adjourn to Tuesday, November 16, 1999, at 7:00 p.m. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director SUBJ: 2000 Budget Changes DATE: November 3 , 1999 Introduction Council is asked to review the development fee revenue for 2000 based on three quarters of experience for 1999 and potential expenditure changes . Background Revenue The development revenues for 1999 as of 9/30/99 are ahead of budget for 1999 and ahead of the projections currently in the 2000 budget . After reviewing the attached information, does Council want to change the 2000 budget forecast for development revenues and/or tax levy? Expenditures The expenditure changes for consideration are; Tree Grant - spend in 2000 $15, 000 Revenue - grants 7, 500 The tree grant just authorized will have expenditures continuing into 2000 . Finance - part time wages $15, 000 Addition to $5, 000 already in the 2000 budget for part time/temp wages . In order to provide for a regular part time position at the Accountant I level or below, additional funds in the budget are needed. This just provides funding, details, job description and authorization will follow later. Architect services $20, 000 Services authorized now will probably have most of the expenditures in 2000 . Security system - City Hall $ 5, 000 Does Council want to budget for a security system in City Hall to protect against break in, theft or vandalism? Vault fire protection $10, 000 There is a small risk of electrical fire in the vault, is a fire suppression needed? Fire alarm connection to dispatch $ 2, 000 The fire alarm system in City Hall is not connected outside of the building. The alarms could be sounding for hours before anyone is aware of them. Does Council want a connection to dispatch to protect city assets/property? Action Discuss and give staff direction. '``JV Gregg 4ox and Finan e Director N:\budget\revrev00 CITY OF SHAKOPEE 2000 GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY 1995 1996 1997 1998 Actual Actual Actual Actual Revenue Taxes $2,950,583 $2,873,265 $3,093,665 $3,102,353 Special Assessments 0 0 0 0 Licenses and Permits 589,104 711,190 746,705 1,182,851 Intergovernmental 779,276 876,219 955,070 1,368,529 Charges for Service 935,196 1,075,570 1,045,053 1,294,739 Fines and Forfeits 80,083 95,865 84,708 99,140 Miscellaneous 323,187 318,053 438,044 413,991 Total Revenue 5,657,429 5,950,162 6,363,245 7,461,603 Expenditures General Government 1,451,119 1,451,119 1,502,375 1,605,783 Public Safety 2,050,871 2,050,871 2,394,648 2,396,551 Public Works 1,123,556 1,123,556 1,222,062 1,549,421 Recreation 610,584 610,584 315,551 390,557 Miscellaneous 33,780 33,780 90,936 413,064 Total Expenditures 5,269,910 5,269,910 5,525,572 6,355,376 Excess (deficiency) Revenues over Expenditures 387,519 680,252 837,673 1,106,227 Other Sources 759,832 759,832 1,066,545 876,328 Other Uses (96,971) (96,971) (2,321,602) (1,791,309) Excess (deficiency) Revenues &Other Sources Over Expenditures& Other Uses $1,050,380 $1,343,113 ($417,384) $191,246 Residual Equity Transfer Fund Balance December 31 $3,278,126 $4,245,885 $3,828,501 $4,019,747 Expenditure projections for 2001 through 2004 assumes a 4%increase each year. Revenues and Expenditures for the Pool and Park&Rec.divisions are budgeted in the Recreation (Enterprise)Fund starting in 1996. 1 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate $3,213,008 $3,650,736 $3,862,309 $4,086,108 $4,322,796 $4,573,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 718,900 1,076,250 1,103,250 1,130,250 1,157,250 1,184,250 I 929,700 1,003,600 930,870 930,870 930,870 930,870 1,085,780 1,115,450 1,128,760 1,142,320 1,156,140 1,170,260 90,000 95,000 97,000 99,000 101,000 103,000 320,000 365,600 365,600 365,600 365,600 365,600 6,357,388 7,306,636 7,487,789 7,754,148 8,033,656 8,327,280 2,096,220 2,064,130 2,146,695 2,232,563 2,232,563 2,321,866 2,876,460 3,302,650 3,434,756 3,572,146 3,572,146 3,715,032 1,480,680 1,597,740 1,661,650 1,728,116 1,728,116 1,797,240 487,090 520,430 541,247 562,897 562,897 585,413 257,580 203,900 212,056 220,538 220,538 229,360 7,198,030 7,688,850 7,996,404 8,316,260 8,316,260 8,648,911 (840,642) (382,214) (508,615) (562,112) (282,604) (321,631) 925,000 825,000 849,750 875,243 901,500 928,545 (336,970) (347,110) (360,994) (375,434) (375,434) (390,452) ($252,612) $95,676 ($19,859) ($62,304) $243,462 $216,463 $3,767,135 $3,862,811 $3,842,952 $3,780,648 $4,086,414 $3,997,111 2000 GENERAL FUND BUDGET-REVENUES 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL YTD (6-30-99) Taxes Current Ad Valorem $ 2,532,961 $ 2,559,150 $ 2,480,420 $ 2,620,138 $ 2,601,008 $ 1,464,431 Tax Increment 31,605 511 9,894 Moblie Home Fiscal Disparities 319,487 276,001 272,708 317,008 333,345 143,605 Aggregate Tax - 26,160 10,965 Lodging Tax 99,384 115,432 120,137 124,553 141,329 55,900 Total Taxes 2,951,832 2,950,583 2,873,265 3,093,304 3,102,353 1,684,795 Special Assessment 80 Licenses&Permits Cable Franchise 40,680 51,568 42,852 - - Track Franchise - 13,888 10,663 8,503 8,652 Liquor Licenses 60,545 66,847 80,094 81,603 93,491 89,415 Beer Licenses 9,077 3,806 644 1,803 1,933 2,227 Cigarette licenses 645 2,590 3,342 2,300 6,242 292 Misc. Business Permits 5,108 3,326 5,443 3,690 3,579 1,078 Building Permits 201,983 323,876 428,871 431,498 722,665 415,804 Plumbing Permits 31,123 41,789 50,097 71,590 113,047 57,115 Mechanical Permits 26,372 36,159 28,839 70,337 126,237 32,323 Electric Permits 24,374 33,510 43,354 58,261 75,291 45,919 Septic Permits 1,500 1,802 1,550 1,450 1,800 560 Sewer Permits 5,253 5,981 8,232 9,067 20,774 7,344 Street Opening Permits 3,725 3,500 6,650 5,880 8,330 2,380 Dog Licenses 286 458 559 724 770 446 Misc. Non-Bus. Lic. 321 4 - - 40 60 Total Lic. &Permits 410,992 589,104 711,190 746,706 1,182,851 654,963 Intergovernmental Grants-Fed 13,306 23,332 47,016 287,668 62,759 State Grants&Aids 158,842 150,866 281,213 9,708 Local Government Aid 158,842 150,866 177,612 194,793 203,588 HACA 450,363 456,586 433,665 443,694 443,531 Mobile Home 593 1,070 928 361 - Local Performance Aid 15,506 18,943 PERA Aid 9,085 18,170 Police Training 5,911 6,168 6,449 5,406 - State Hwy Maint Aid 101,085 33,303 101,795 119,473 - Police State Aid 98,471 96,680 111,412 103,185 115,416 County Grants/Aid 98,471 96,680 - - - Aggregate Tax 15,807 12,497 21,026 16,912 - Local Grants/Aids - Total Intergovernmental 1,088,385 1,018,022 876,219 955,431 1,368,529 72,467 2000 GENERAL FUND BUDGET-REVENUES 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Budget EST. EST. EST. EST. EST. Taxes Current Ad Valorem $ 2,749,213 $ 3,168,216 $ 3,358,309 $ 3,559,808 $ 3,773,396 $ 3,999,800 Tax Increment - - - - - Moblie Home 700 400 400 400 400 400 Fiscal Disparities 315,095 329,120 345,600 362,900 381,000 400,100 Aggregate Tax 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 Lodging Tax 130,000 135,000 140,000 145,000 150,000 155,000 Total Taxes 3,213,008 3,650,736 3,862,309 4,086,108 4,322,796 4,573,300 Special Assessment Licenses&Permits Cable Franchise - - - Track Franchise 10,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 Liquor Licenses 80,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 Beer Licenses 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Cigarette licenses 3,300 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 Misc. Business Permits 4,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Building Permits 450,000 700,000 720,000 740,000 760,000 780,000 Plumbing Permits 70,000 100,000 105,000 110,000 115,000 120,000 Mechanical Permits 40,000 80,000 82,000 84,000 86,000 88,000 Electric Permits 45,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 Septic Permits 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Sewer Permits 7,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 Street Opening Permits 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Dog Licenses 600 750 750 750 750 750 Misc. Non-Bus. Lic. - - - - - - Total Lic. &Permits 718,900 1,076,250 1,103,250 1,130,250 1,157,250 1,184,250 Intergovernmental Grants-Fed 89,500 154,520 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 State Grants&Aids 5,600 14,760 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Local Government Aid 213,625 219,200 219,200 219,200 219,200 219,200 HACA 442,945 458,740 458,740 458,740 458,740 458,740 Mobile Home Local Performance Aid 16,600 - PERA Aid 11,930 11,930 11,930 11,930 11,930 11,930 Police Training 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 State Hwy Maint Aid - - - - - - Police State Aid 105,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 County Grants/Aid 38,500 - - - - - Aggregate Tax - - - - - Local Grants/Aids - 28,450 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Total Intergovernmental 929,700 1,003,600 930,870 930,870 930,870 930,870 I/ 2000 GENERAL FUND BUDGET-REVENUES 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL YTD (6-30-991 Charges for Service Administrative Fee 29,582 61,048 41,863 51,005 115,971 17,076 Plan Check 108,917 177,691 252,211 241,577 400,918 239,031 Sale of Documents 9,354 10,601 9,511 9,750 11,294 4,122 Assessment Search 4,010 4,453 4,431 4,834 9,685 3,200 Release of Dev.Agreeme 490 583 411 420 613 285 Comprehensive Plan Fee 2,470 194 87 175 - Land Division Administra 18,754 5,877 11,960 13,627 18,343 9,015 Land Use Administration 7,036 26,963 27,539 49,523 22,300 13,652 Radon Kit Sales 1,000 - Misc. Police Services 4,734 11,241 18,488 27,818 36,707 52,898 Fire Calls&Contracts 29,748 32,973 27,172 39,881 35,449 19,496 Pound Fines&Fees 2,998 2,190 3,260 3,100 3,605 1,210 Valleyfair 13,570 14,927 16,420 18,062 19,868 21,855 Snow Removal 6,228 3,943 5,712 8,737 - Street Repair 875 - - - - Public Works Rentals 803 - - - Misc. Public Works 8,194 10,401 30,618 19,455 29,039 13,254 Engineering Services 375,527 394,976 546,920 502,118 517,935 308,136 Engineering Grade Fee 2,850 2,401 78,967 53,970 73,012 57,143 Weed Removal 570 - - - Total Charges for Svs. 781,002 935,196 1,075,570 1,045,052 1,294,739 760,373 Fines and Forfeits Court Fines 64,914 80,083 95,865 84,708 99,140 54,583 Miscellaneous Miscellaneous 52,267 70,906 57,559 115,161 81,439 106,675 Interest 129,718 219,412 235,918 296,330 317,277 Rent 15,670 29,673 24,576 21,202 15,196 7,052 Contributions 1,635 3,196 - 5,350 - Total Miscellaneous 199,290 323,187 318,053 438,043 413,912 113,727 Total Revenues 5,496,415 5,896,175 5,950,162 6,363,244 7,461,604 3,340,908 Other Sources Sale Of Assets 2,059 342 2,462 75,000 400 Operating Transfers 218,885 - Capital Equipment 747,302 - - SPUC Contribution 286,197 759,489 789,232 772,660 875,927 360,000 Total Other Sources 1,035,558 759,831 791,694 1,066,545 876,327 360,000 Grand Total $6,531,973 $6,656,006 $6,741,856 $7,429,789 $8,337,931 $3,700,908 -5- 2000 GENERAL FUND BUDGET-REVENUES 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Budget EST. EST. EST. EST. EST. Charges for Service Administrative Fee 45,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Plan Check 290,000 350,000 355,000 360,000 365,000 370,000 Sale of Documents 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Assessment Search 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Release of Dev. Agreeme 400 450 450 450 450 450 Comprehensive Plan Fee 100 - - - - Land Division Administra 14,420 17,000 17,510 18,040 18,580 19,140 Land Use Administration 41,000 30,000 30,500 31,000 31,500 32,000 Radon Kit Sales - - - - - - Misc. Police Services 10,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 Fire Calls &Contracts 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 Pound Fines&Fees 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Valleyfair 21,860 23,000 25,300 27,830 30,610 33,670 Snow Removal - - - - - - Street Repair - - - - - - Public Works Rentals - - - - - - Misc. Public Works 20,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Engineering Services 525,000 490,000 495,000 500,000 505,000 510,000 Engineering Grade Fee 65,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Weed Removal - - Total Charges for Svs. 1,085,780 1,115,450 1,128,760 1,142,320 1,156,140 1,170,260 Fines and Forfeits Court Fines 90,000 95,000 97,000 99,000 101,000 103,000 Miscellaneous Miscellaneous 60,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Interest 245,000 275,600 275,600 275,600 275,600 275,600 Rent 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Contributions - Total Miscellaneous 320,000 365,600 365,600 365,600 365,600 365,600 Total Revenues 6,357,388 7,306,636 7,487,789 7,754,148 8,033,656 8,327,280 Other Sources Sale Of Assets - Operating Transfers - Capital Equipment SPUC Contribution 925,000 825,000 849,750 875,243 901,500 928,545 Total Other Sources 925,000 825,000 849,750 875,243 901,500 928,545 Grand Total $7,282,388 $8,131,636 $8,337,539 $8,629,390 $8,935,156 $9,255,825 4 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Major revenues Actual Actual Actual Actual 9/30/99 Budget Revise? 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2000 Building Permit $ 323,876 $ 428,871 $ 431,498 $ 722,665 $ 967,677 $ 700,000 $ 800,000 Plumbing Permit 41,789 50,097 71,590 113,047 102,606 100,000 Mechanical Permit 36,159 28,839 70,337 126,237 69,231 80,000 Engineering Services 394,976 546,920 502,118 517,935 617,147 490,000 590,000 Plan Check 177,691 252,211 241,577 400,918 569,780 360,000 460,000 $1,000,000 $900,000 - $800,000 - r •r• rr „• -Building Permit $700,000 r• �„ -i-Plumbing Permit �• • • " -h.-Mechanical Permit $600,000 - •�. _ -_--,-...,..--«. -, -Engineering Services ••• - ............ .. Plan Check $500,000 - -�t•. = -Log.(Building Permit) r ""'� -Log.(Mechanical Permit) ........ri Log.(Plumbing Permit) $400,000 - ♦ ..c"" - - - Log.(Plan Check) - - Log.(Engineering Services $300,000 ----0, $200,000 ---- $100,000 wrr..__ - • r.n......- 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 YEAR 1:53 PM 11/3/99 GENERAL.XLS revchart99b CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Ordinance regarding Individual Sewage Treatment Systems(ISTS) in the City of Shakopee MEETING DATE: November 9, 1999 INTRODUCTION: In July, based on information available to staff and the Council, the Council provided direction to develop an ordinance that would turn over management of existing ISTS to Scott County, but retain permitting of new systems. Subsequent to receiving that direction staff has completed its inventory of IST systems, talked with Al Frechette, Scott County Environmental Services. Mr. Frechette expressed a preference on the County's part to take over new systems as well, in order to be able to collect the permit revenue for new systems. The cities of Savage and Prior Lake have, or will shortly, turn over both permitting and management to Scott County. If the City were to turn over both new and existing systems to the County, the ordinance revision would be as shown on the attached draft ordinance. Once the City deletes its current ordinance referencing the County ordinance, management of existing systems becomes the responsibility of the County by operation of statute. The inventory compiled by Julie Klima and Beth Handrich of the planning staff shows that, as of July 1999, there were 417 IST systems in the City(not including those on section land). There appear to be about 232 systems on section land. As of the same time, there were 149 residential lots remaining in inventory that would be served by such systems. Thus the total number of potential IST systems in the City appears to be about 798 at this time. In the last 3 years, the City has issued between 15 and 25 permits per year for houses with ISTS. Thus,the number of persons who would be affected by turning over permitting of new systems to the County would be relatively small. Based on the information above Council is asked to review again whether to retain permitting of new systems or to turn permitting over to Scott County. Based on the Council's discussion and further direction, staff will present the Council with a draft ordinance at the next available regular meeting. ACTION REQUESTED: Affirm the Council's previous direction on the permitting of new IST systems, or direct staff to prepare an ordinance that turns permitting of new systems to Scott County as well. R. Michael Leek Community Development Director a t ORDINANCE NO.XXX,FOURTH SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA,AMENDING SHAKOPEE CITY CODE CHAPTER 4,BUILDING REGULATIONS BY AMENDING SEC.4.20.SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS WHEREAS,Minnesota Statutes require the permitting of new Individual Sewage Treatment Systems(ISTS)and the management of existing ISTS;and WHEREAS,Scott County has developed and put in operation a program for the permitting and management of ISTS;and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Shakopee has determined that it would be costly and duplicative for the City to issue permits for new ISTS and to manage existing ISTS. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA,DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1—That Shakopee City Code Sec.4.20.Sewage Treatment System shall be deleted,and replaced by the following: SEC.4.20.INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS. Subd. 1.Permit Required. Where public sanitary sewer is not available to serve a building,the building shall be connected to a private,individual sewage treatment system. No private,individual sewage treatment system shall be installed without a valid permit from Scott County. Section 2-Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,Minnesota held this day of , 1999. Jon Brekke,Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Judith S.Cox,City Clerk Published in the Shakopee Valley News on the day of , 1999. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Shakopee Planning Commission Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Residential Platting Moratorium Wrap-Up MEETING DATE: November 9, 1999 INTRODUCTION: On Tuesday, February 16, 1999 the Council approved Ordinance No. 540, an interim ordinance imposing a moratorium on new residential plats, conditional use permits (CUPs), and planned unit developments(PUDs)until December 1, 1999. A copy of the approved interim ordinance is attached for the Council's information. With the expiration date of the moratorium rapidly approaching, it is appropriate to summarize the process followed over the past several months, as well as the outcomes of that process. DISCUSSION: Process: Over the course of the past 9 months, the Council has met jointly with the Planning Commission to 1)identify critical issues, 2) develop general strategies for addressing those issues, 3)provide city staff with direction regarding those strategies, and 4)review specific proposals developed by staff. During that period, city staff contacted numerous other cities and reviewed volumes of current literature regarding development patterns and control mechanisms. Following is a summary of the scheduled meetings that were held during the moratorium period: Date Event/Subjects Addressed February 16, 1999 Ordinance No. 540 adopted March 23, 1999 Joint meeting of City Council and Planning Commission to discuss study process and expected outcomes April 29, 1999 Joint meeting of City Council and Planning Commission: Small group process Wksp1109.doc May 25, 1999 Joint meeting of City Council and Planning Commission to review outcomes of the April 29th small group process. June 22, 1999 Joint meeting of City Council and Planning Commission to review proposed ordinance amendments and provide specific direction to staff July 27, 1999 Tour of recent and current developments August 23, 1999 Joint meeting of City Council and Planning Commission to review additional proposals for ordinance and process revisions September 9, 1999 Joint meeting of City Council and Planning Commission October 12, 1999 Joint meeting of City Council and Planning Commission Strategies: Early in the study process, the City Council identified the following"priority action strategies" for the moratorium: • Develop better transitions to and from single family districts, ■ Insure better physical buffering between residential and other land uses, • Develop commercial district regulations that distinguish between types of commercial uses, and provide for a neighborhood commercial district, • Complete review and adoption of the new subdivision ordinance and design criteria • Provide for more PUD control • Provide better disclosure regarding proposed development • Proposed development signs • Develop and encourage mixed use development • Insure the provision of more open space Ordinance Revisions: Accompanying this memorandum are copies of the proposed zoning text amendments that have been or will be reviewed by the Planning Commission, and which will ultimately be considered by the City Council. On August 17, 1999 the City adopted the new subdivision ordinance. Signs have been placed on order that would be placed on potential rezoning sites(delivery is expected in about 6 weeks). The proposed text amendments fall into the following areas: Wksp1109.doc 1. Definitions of types of residences; 2. Amendments to residential district uses and design standards; 3. Amendment of screening standards; 4. Addition of new commercial zones; 5. Amendment of the conditional use permit process; 6. Addition of a planned residential district; 7. Tree preservation and replacement. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing at its October and November meeting on amendment items 1 —5 listed above. The Commission recommended approval of items 1 —4 with revisions. The revisions are italicized. The Commission recommended not adopting item 5, but rather staying with the current review process. Staff's understanding of the Commissions reasons for the recommendation are that 1)the current structure provides a better opportunity to more fully air the issues in conditional use applications, and 2)the proposed change would unduly burden the City Council with additional work. Items 6 and 7 are scheduled for public hearing before the Planning Commission on December 9, 1999. ACTION REQUESTED: Council, and the Commission, are asked to provide staff with any direction deemed appropriate before the attached ordinances are formally reviewed at a regular Council meeting. Wksp1109.doc DEFINITIONS: Section 11.02 (Definitions) Single Family Attached Dwelling- a dwelling sharing one or more common walls with an adjoining dwelling unit,which is designed for and occupied exclusively by one family. Single Family Detached Dwelling-a dwelling unit which has open space on all sides and is designed for and occupied exclusively by one family. Multiple Family Dwelling-a dwelling unit which shares one or more common walls, as well, as common ceiling and/or floor with adjoining dwelling unit(s), which is designed for and occupied exclusively by one family. Other definitions would be re-ordered as necessary. If these definitions were to be adopted as written,twin home and townhouse units would be classified as single family attached dwelling units. Structures such as apartment buildings would be classified as multiple family dwellings. The individual zoning districts would then need to be amended to allow for the revised language. Staff suggests that Single Family Detached Dwellings be allowed as/added to the lists of permitted uses in the following zones: • Agricultural Preservation(AG)Zone; • Rural Residential(RR)Zone; • Low Density Residential (R-1A)Zone; • Urban Residential(R-1B)Zone; • Old Shakopee Residential (R-1C)Zone; • Medium Density Residential(R2)Zone; and • High Density Residential(R3)Zone. Staff suggests that Single Family Attached Dwellings be allowed/added as permitted uses as follows: • Structures containing two attached dwelling units in the Old Shakopee Residential(R-1C)Zone, Medium Density Residential(R2)Zone; and High Density Residential(R3)Zone. • Structures containing two to four attached dwelling units in the Medium Density Residential(R2)Zone; and High Density Residential(R3)Zone. • Structures containing more than four attached dwelling units in the High Density Residential(R3)Zone. Multiple family dwellings could then be allowed as a permitted use in the High Density Residential(R3)Zone. Wksp1109.doc RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT USE AND DESIGN STANDARDS: City Code Sec. 11.50(Planned Unit Development District)currently allows the development of mixed use PUD's. In order to make that point more clear to the development community, it is proposed that the zoning districts be amended to include the following item as a"permitted use,"to-wit, Single and Mixed Use Developments which comply with Section 11.50 and have received approval as such from the City Council. It is recommended that the proposed language be incorporated into the following zoning districts: • Low Density Residential (R-1A)Zone; • Urban Residential (R-1B)Zone; • Old Shakopee Residential (R-1C)Zone; • Medium Density Residential(R2)Zone; • High Density Residential(R3)Zone; • Highway Business(B1)Zone; • Office Business(B2)Zone; • Central Business(B3)Zone; • Light Industrial(I1)Zone; • Heavy Industrial(12)Zone; • Major Recreation(MR)Zone; and • Business Park(BP)Zone. SCREENING STANDARDS: It is proposed that City Code Sec. 11.60, (Performance Standards) Subd. 7 (Screening), be amended by adding; H. Benning at a minimum height of 4 feet, with overstory deciduous and coniferous landscaping units shall be provided for 1)residential properties which adjoin existing or proposed residential developments with higher densities, commercial, industrial, or that abut collector and/or arterial roadways. and 2) higher density residential, commercial, or industrial developments that abut existing residential development. SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS: The original proposal was to convert the conditional use permit review process be to a site plan approval process, wherein the Planning Commission would make a recommendation to the City Council, which would then reach a final decision. The City Attorney has commented that the"conditional use permit" language should be retained to retain the greatest amount of discretion to impose conditions. The Planning Commission has recommended against the proposed change in process. Wksp1109.doc COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS: Wksp1109.doc SEC. XX.XX. Neighborhood Commercial (N-C) Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Neighborhood Commercial zone is to provide areas for the development of low-intensity, service-oriented uses for surrounding the immediate residential areas. `Immediate residential areas are understood to be those that are generally within five (5)minutes walking distance of a neighborhood commercial area. Subd.2. Permitted Uses. Within the Neighborhood Commercial zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: A. retail; B. administrative, executive, and professional offices; C. medical or dental clinics; : • . , • .• • . . • • ; (re-letter from this point forward) F. medical or dental clinics; G. services; H. public buildings. Subd.3. Uses Permitted with Site-Plan-Review a conditional use permit. Within the Neighborhood Commercial zone, no structure or land shall be used for any of the following uses except after site-plan-review approval of a conditional use permit: A. taverns; B. churches; C. animal hospitals and veterinary clinics; D. restaurants, class II; E. gas stations; F. bed and breakfast inns; G. uses having a drive-up or drive-through window Wkspl109.doc H. funeral homes; I. day care facilities; J. relocated structures; K. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot; L. other uses similar to those permitted in this subdivision, as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Subd. 4. Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the highway-busimessneighborhood commercial zone the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses: A. Any incidental repair or processing necessary to conduct a permitted principal use; B. parking and loading spaces; C. temporary construction buildings; D. decorative landscape features; . . . . .. • . F. other accessory uses customarily appurtenant to a permitted or conditional use, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd.5. Design Standards. A. Minimum lot area: 1 acre B. Maximum impervious surface coverage: 839675% C. Lot specifications: Minimum lot width: 100 feet Building setbacks: minimum front yard setback: 30 feet minimum side yard setback: 20 feet minimum rear yard setback: 30 feet minimum side or rear yard setback from residential zone: 50 feet Wksp1109.doc Maximum height: 35 feet Dumpsters, trash handling equipment, and recycling equipment shall be stored within the principal structure, or within a fully enclosed accessory structure constructed of the same materials as the principal structure. Exterior lighting fixtures shall be of downcast, cutoff type. parking or drive aisle setbacks: minimum side yard setback: 10 feet minimum rear yard setback: 10 feet minimum side or rear yard setback from residential zone: 20 feet Subd. 6. Construction Materials. In the neighborhood commercial zone only the following materials may be used for the exterior finish of any principal or accessory building: face brick, stone, glass, decorative concrete block, architecturally treated concrete, cast in place or precast concrete, stucco, and materials substantially similar to these as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Steel, aluminum, copper, or other high quality, durable metal, and wood may be used, but only as an accent,trim or frame, and not as siding for a substantial portion of any building facade. Wksp1109.doc SEC. XX.XX. Community Commercial(CC) Subd. 1. Purpose. The purposes of the community commercial zone are: • to provide areas that allow the concentration of general commercial development for the convenience of Shakopee residents and the greater Shakopee trade area; • to provide space for larger community facilities and institutions that may be appropriately located in commercial areas; • to provide adequate space to meet the parking spaces, loading, and traffic management needs of larger scale commercial development. Subd.2. Permitted Uses. Within the community commercial zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: A. retail; B. administrative, executive, and professional offices; C. medical or dental clinics; D. restaurants, Class I E. showroom facilities; F. medical or dental clinics; G. services; H. public buildings. Subd.3. Uses Permitted with a conditional use permit. Within the Neighborhood Commercial zone, no structure or land shall be used for any of the following uses except after site-plan-mview approval of a conditional use permit: A. taverns; B. churches; C. animal hospitals and veterinary clinics; D. restaurants, class II; E. gas stations; F. hotels and motels; Wksp1109.doc G. uses having a drive-up or drive-through window H. funeral homes; I. day care facilities; J. vehicle sales, service and repair K. relocated structures; L. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot; M. Structures taller than 45 feet in height; N. other uses similar to those permitted in this subdivision, as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Subd. 4.Uses Permitted by PUD. A. Retail centers, B. Multiple family dwellings C. [reserved] Subd. 5. Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the highway business zone the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses: A. Any incidental repair or processing necessary to conduct a permitted principal use; B. parking and loading spaces; C. temporary construction buildings; D. decorative landscape features; E. other accessory uses customarily appurtenant to a permitted or conditional use, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 6. Design Standards. D. Minimum lot area: 1 acre E. Maximum impervious surface coverage: 889675% Wksp1109.doc F. Lot specifications: Minimum lot width: 100 feet Building setbacks: minimum front yard setback: 50 feet minimum side yard setback: 20 feet minimum rear yard setback: 50 feet minimum side or rear yard setback from residential zone: 100 feet Maximum height: .151w. Dumpsters, trash handling equipment, and recycling equipment shall be stored within the principal structure, or within a fully enclosed accessory structure constructed of the same materials as the principal structure. Exterior lighting fixtures shall be of downcast, cutoff type. parking or drive aisle setbacks: minimum side yard setback: 20 feet minimum rear yard setback: 20 feet minimum side or rear yard setback from residential zone: 100 feet Subd. 7. Construction Materials. In the neighborhood commercial zone only the following materials may be used for the exterior finish of any principal or accessory building: face brick, stone, glass, decorative concrete block, architecturally treated concrete, cast in place or precast concrete, stucco, and materials substantially similar to these as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Steel, aluminum, copper, or other high quality, durable metal, and wood may be used,but only as an accent,trim or frame, and not as siding for a substantial portion of any building facade. Wksp1109.doc PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT: SEC. XX.XX. Planned Residential District Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Planned Residential District(PRD)is to provide areas for the mixed-use development; including single-family detached, medium-density, and high-density residential, as well as compatible neighborhood commercial and service uses. By allowing mixed-use development,the PRD provides a mechanism for providing a range of housing types and easy accessibility to services either within a single development or area of the City of Shakopee. Subd.2. Permitted Uses. Within the Planned Residential District,the following shall be permitted uses. A. single family detached dwellings; B. two(2)family dwellings; C. public recreation; E. utility services; F. day care facilities servicing twelve(12)or fewer persons; G. public buildings H. group family day care facilities serving fourteen(14)or fewer children; I. residential facilities serving six(6) or fewer persons; J. adult day care centers subject to the following conditions: The adult day care centers shall: 1. serve 12 or fewer persons; 2. provide proof of an adequate water and sewer system if not served by municipal utilities; 3. have outdoor leisure/recreation areas located and designed to minimize visual and noise impacts on adjacent areas; 4. the total indoor space available for use by participants must equal at least 40 square feet for each day care participant and each day care staff member present at the center. When a center is located in a multifunctional organization,the center may share a common space with the multifunctional organization if the required space available for use by participants is maintained while the center is operating. In determining the square footage of usable indoor space available, a center must not count: Wksp1109.doc a) hallways, stairways, closets, offices, restrooms, and utility and storage areas; b) more than 25 percent of the space occupied by the furniture or equipment used by participants or staff; or c) in a multifunctional organization, any space occupied by persons associated with the multifunctional organization while participants are using common space; and i) comply with all other State licensing requirements. Subd.3. Uses Permitted with Site Plan Review. Within the Planned Residential District,the following uses of structures or land may be allowed after site plan review and approval: A. medium density residential development as allowed under City Code Sec. 11.32,Medium Density Residential Zone, and according to the design standards contained therein; B. multiple family residential development as allowed under City Code Sec. 11.34 and according to the design standards contained therein; C. neighborhood commercial development as allowed under City Code Sec. XX.XX and according to the design standards contained therein; D. clinics; E. nursing homes; F. churches and other places of worship; G. public or private schools H. relocated structures; I. structures over two and one-half(2 'h) stories or thirty-five(35)feet in height; J. relocated structures; K. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot; L. developments containing more than one permitted use and/or use permitted with site plan approval; M. day care facilities serving thirteen(13)through sixteen(16)persons; Wkspl109.doc N. residential facilities servicing from seven(7)through sixteen(16)persons; 0. other uses similar to those permitted in this subdivision, as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Subd. 4. Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the Planned Residential District the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses: A. Any incidental repair or processing necessary to conduct a permitted principal use; B. parking and loading spaces; C. temporary construction buildings; D. decorative landscape features; E. other accessory uses customarily appurtenant to a permitted or conditional use, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd.5. Design Standards. Except as otherwise provided above, design standards in the Planned Residential District shall be as found in City Code Sec. 11.28,Urban Residential Zone(R-1B) Wksp1109.doc s3f CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Draft Revised Comprehensive Plan MEETING DATE: November 9, 1999 INTRODUCTION: The accompanying draft comprehensive plan is provided to the City Council and Planning Commission to collect any additional direction the bodies may have before the plan is sent to adjacent jurisdictions for review and comment, and submission of the plan to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment. DISCUSSION: Under an amendment to the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, all cities, townships, and counties in the seven-county Metropolitan Area are required to certify or revise their existing comprehensive plans or prepare new comprehensive plans. Because the City of Shakopee's current Comprehensive Plan was adopted in October of 1996, but the opening of STH 169 brought to light land use issues that had not been fully addressed in the current plan, staff proceeded with a revision of the Plan. The original deadline for submission of these plans was December 31, 1999. The Metropolitan Council has extended the deadline for submission of comprehensive plans to December 31, 1999. In order to meet that deadline, Council is asked to approve distribution of the draft Plan at this time to allow a 30-day review by adjacent and affected jurisdictions. From 1997 through March of 1999, several public meetings and public hearings were held on the Comprehensive Plan, or specific chapters of the Plan, including; A series of 3 public meetings on the Comprehensive Plan in 1997 December 18, 1997— Planning Commission workshop on the Comprehensive Plan March 19, 1998— Transportation Plan Workshop October 8 and November 5, 1998— Public Hearing on Surface Water Management Plan Chapter May 21, 1998— Town Hall Meeting on Comprehensive Plan(over 770 individual notices sent; attached notice published in Shakopee Valley News) January 21 and March 4, 1999— Public Hearing held on proposed Comprehensive Plan The Council has 2 alternative actions before submitting the Plan to the Metropolitan Council; 1) adopt a resolution to submit the Plan to the Metropolitan Council without preliminary approval, and 2) adopt a resolution of conditional approval subject to Metropolitan Council review and comment. Staff is aware of, and in agreement with,the Council's desire to provide yet another opportunity to review and comment on the document. However, because of the relatively short time before the submission deadline, Council may want to consider following alternative 1, and holding an additional public hearing subsequent to Metropolitan Council review. Council's direction is sought as to its preferred action. Finally, Council has provided staff with direction as to the terms under which it is willing to enter into an orderly annexation agreement with Jackson Township. Staff would appreciate further discussion and direction as to the timetable the Council would like to follow in completing discussions with the township officials, and when the Council would like to schedule ACTIONS REQUESTED: 1. Offer and pass a motion authorizing staff to distribute copies of the draft Comprehensive Plan for review and comment by adjacent jurisdictions. 2. Provide staff direction as to whether to schedule additional public hearing(s)before or after submission of the Plan to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment.