HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/07/1994 TENTATIVE AGENDA
ADJ.REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 7 , 1994
LOCATION: City Hall, 129 Holmes Street South
Mayor Gary Laurent presiding
1] Roll Call at 7 : 00 P.M.
2 ] Open Public Hearing on 1995 Budget
3 ] Opening Remarks by Mayor Laurent
4 ] Budget Review by Councilor Sweeney
5] City Council remarks and questions
6] Citizen comments and questions
7] Close Public Hearing or continue to December 14th at 7 : 00 P.M.
8] Other Business
9] Adjourn to Wednesday, December 14th at 7: 00 P.M. , or Tuesday,
December 20th at 7 : 00 P.M.
Dennis R. Kraft
City Administrator
REMINDER: Committee of the Whole meeting December 14th at
7 : 30 P.M. Joint meeting with County and Township
officials to plan for growth in Northern Scott
County
TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Tax Levy & Budget Hearing
DATE: December 1, 1994
Introduction and Background
Council has a public hearing set for December 7, 1994 at 7:00 PM to
receive comment on the proposed pay 1995 property tax levy for the
City and the 1995 budget.
If the hearing runs long, Council has set a continuation date of
December 14 .
If the hearing is closed on the 7th, Council must announce that
there will be subsequent meeting on the 20th to actually adopt the
tax levy and the budget.
Action Requested
Open public hearing on the 1995 tax levy and budget, receive
comment, announce that there will be a [continuation of the public
hearing on December 14, 1994 in City Hall at 7: 00 PM] or [a
subsequent hearing on December 20, 1994 in City Hall at 7: 30 PM to
actually adopt the tax levy and budget] and close the hearing.
Materials for Tax Levy Hearing
12/7/94
dP
M
M
dP
0
0
coU
•
•
V
•
U1
P4 w
O
E-1
{ �
f
•.1,114
:>r
Ga
3 _ •y .res
E-4
AC'
H ,—I - -r
t ,x�
1/1 -4,
sYYj"
dP
CO0
0
0
dP
1-1
ui
N
0
dP
in•
.1
� r-I
0
do >al 4j
•
co
:.
V `-� r _
H •
w
., • t ++ •
114
X In
Exl
4.1 rti
l
PI
do
H co
i I
dP
•
C•1 O
N
U �
C4
W
a� O
ca �
A
rd
v
GI
•.a
CIL'Y OF SHAKOPEE
1995 GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY
1994 1995
Estimate Estimate
Revenue
Taxes $2,816,882 $2,854,504
Special Assessments 0 0
Licenses and Permits 344,700 444,600
Intergovernmental 809,480 821 ,250
Charges for Service 659,210 749,560
Fines and Forfeits 60,000 64,000
Miscellaneous 96,590 141 ,350
Total Revenue 4,786,862 5,075,264
Expenditures
General Government 1 ,366,720 1 ,536,770
Public Safety 2,441 ,950 2,098,670
Public Works 1 ,127,350 1 ,228,400
Recreation 666,950 668,580
Miscellaneous 177,000 136,000
Total Expenditures 5,779,970 5,668,420
Excess (deficiency) Revenues
over Expenditures (993,108) (593,156)
Other Sources 978,634 624,384
Other Uses 0
Excess (deficiency) Revenues
& Other Sources Over
Expenditures & Other Uses ($14,474) $31 ,228
Residual Equity Transfer
Fund Balance December 31 $1 ,490,376 $1 ,521 ,604
• CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
General Fund Budget Summary by Division
Division 1994 1995
Budget Proposed
Council 67,420 69,450
Administration 194,060 219,200
Clerk 116,690 121 ,170
Finance 278,660 302,310
Legal 185,970 212,090
Planning 408,130 464,430
Gov't Buildings 115,790 148,120
Police 1 ,389,520 1 ,490,650
Fire 865,310 410,240
Inspection 187,120 197,780
Engineering 355,480 357,100
Street 586,820 759,180
Shop 185,050 112,120
Park Maintenance 307,270 292,420
Swimming Pool 150,300 136,580
Recreation 209,380 239,580
Unallocated 177,000 136,000
TOTAL 5,779,970 5,668,420
NEW EMPLOYEE POSITIONS
BUDGETED FOR 1995
Police Officer #1
Police Officer #2
Planning Tech.
Code Enforcement
Comm. Dev.
3 Vol. Firefighters
All positions are less than full year.
Police Officer #2 is dependent on grant approval.
N
t0
to
N
a)
x
ui
H
tfl
W 4/
w =
P114IT,
C7 ON
t 1 :, i
tit. # .n.ay°. ' vt
f-1 01
H �. t t 'i�
Er 1 i 1 w-.r ir'lL i-, . .... = ,..r.qh' 1
g
n
a PI rx4
��Pa0 El
' �+ ?�, 4 w ry"
PI
00
PI
(. • _ x
v dP
cr
1-1
CO
-+a a 4 X '.'
F'
U v ,i ,. t t%. 00
.,-1 .\'
dP � dP CO
a) M {!
fI) H
\ v ^ N
N ........ a)
a) N N
a
x w °w w
V 0 N
o a)
W o
id '� o
-4.) H r1
o
a a
in
-,-1P a) Z
w a)
0
tnP
a)
4)
o
H
ciP
ri
N
N
a)
E
P
a)
o —
clo
o
O
w. '
w
m
Y:.
cdW
rrr7cn
v • w
H
T k
A g U
w4
tai
X Ln
�.
r
•
01
k, .w __________
} �wRz ' ;IIH afE- O ` i r 7 � ,g W
•
W H
a w
K }
.,
P
W r y -?. 'f 1 ' is
z .x;+ L:: s ;i: ' ..
/� a L
..-1
: $ . y
4.3
�'
rti
II) va /ter deo
U a
a)
(Y� N
ch, v
r
• a
,-AQ
N a)
Id
.se
w a)
3 vii
.,-i
U 2
H
A
o
a
0
N-
to
(O
N
C)
Q)
fC
a
H
W
P4
37.
L
W o/ .
rn `
Ih 1-1
H
r� G
a PI
OV T M'k i 'r. ` h'-• S s'
liitk1-1
Z 1St.
ly.. 4
•
ti
W R
co
Co
U,
C)
Q
— N- CO M N N
cn
.O N- CO CO CO co N
a
CIS Ln c
0O coo oo
C co .,—
c
.-
2
C
N LSC) CO M CC) N-
cn Cr) N It))_
Cti v
C
Cil
.0
0
CO CV CV 0 T Cr)
Y
In T In T a)
cn 0 CV Co
as L M d'
U
O CCD CO Lo
IC) S
CO
0)
ttf CO T CV
a)
co
J Nt 0 In r
O
�- CV 'd'
T
.0
a.
Q) CCD COO co CMoLU co
0. N. T LU
O CV
. T
c�
.0
a)
a) a)
a) >,
>+ O
O Ti.
N E W
W
a) Cl) N '" N a)
C N -0 a_
CD a) a)cu O a-
Y ( >, C 't3
>+ Oas
O a) O
cz .--' U)
L
.0 >_ oa c� O a)
+>+. -O co C3) a 0, . _
i- CT) a) a)
0 a T T T
Shakopee Assessed Value and Taxes Payable
Assessed Value Formulas Residential Properties - Homestead
1988/89 1st 68,000 @ 17.00% excess @ 28.00%
Tax Capacity Formulas Residential Properties
1989/90 1st 68,000 @ 1.00% 68-100K @ 2.00% excess @ 3.00%
1990/91 1st 68,000 @ 1.00% 68-100K @ 2.00% excess @ 3.00%
1991/92 1st 72,000 @ 1.00% 72-115K @ 2.00% excess @ 2.50%
1992/93 1st 72,000 @ 1.00% excess @ 2.00%
1993/94 1st 72,000 @ 1.00% excess @ 2.00%
1994/95 1st 72,000 @ 1.00% excess @ 2.00%
Assessed Value Formulas Commercial Properties
1988/89 1st 60,000 @ 28.00% excess @ 43.00%
Tax Capacity Formulas Commercial Properties
1989/90 1st 100,000 @ 3.30% excess @ 5.06%
1990/91 1st 100,000 @ 3.20% excess @ 4.95%
1991/92 1st 100,000 @ 3.10% excess @ 4.75%
1992/93 1st 100,000 @ 3.00% excess @ 4.70%
1993/94 1st 100,000 @ 3.00% excess @ 4.60%
1994/95 1st 100,000 @ 3.00% excess @ 4.60%
See examples on following pages.
Shakopee Assessed Value and Taxes Payable
Residential Tax EMV Tax Cap. City City
Parcel Year Value Value Tax Rate Tax
27-004147-0 1988/89 63,400 1,376 15.008% 206.51
1989/90 66,600 666 16.929% 112.75
1990/91 68,900 698 23.426% 163.51
1991/92 68,900 689 23.979% 165.22
1992/93 72,000 720 28.162% 202.77
1993/94 72,000 720 27.104% 195.15
1994/95 77,000 6.94% 820 13.89% 25.188% 206.54 5.84%
27-037013-0 1988/89 74,800 1,646 15.008% 247.03
1989/90 79,100 1,062 16.929% 179.79
1990/91 79,100 902 23.426% 211.30
1991/92 79,100 862 23.979% 206.70
1992/93 83,200 944 28.162% 265.85
1993/94 83,200 944 27.104% 255.86
1994/95 89,000 6.97% 1,060 12.29% 25.188% 266.99 4.35%
27-033005-0 1988/89 85,800 1,921 15.008% 288.30
1989/90 90,100 1,122 16.929% 189.94
1990/91 90,400 1,128 23.426% 264.25
1991/92 90,500 1,090 23.979% 261.37
1992/93 92,200 1,124 28.162% 316.54 C17A
1993/94 92,200 1,124 27.104% 304.65
1994/95 98,700 7.05% 1,254 11.57% 25.188% 315.86 3.68%
27-015004-0 1988/89 112,700 2,695 15.008% 404.47
1989/90 118,600 1,878 16.929% 317.93
1990/91 120,200 1,826 23.426% 427.76
1991/92 120,200 1,710 23.979% 410.04
1992/93 126,900 1,818 28.162% 511.99
1993/94 126,900 1,818 27.104% 492.75
1994/95 135,800 7.01% 1,996 9.79% 25.188% 502.75 2.03%
27-015006-0 1988/89 129,400 3,246 15.008% 487.16
1989/90 135,800 2,394 16.929% 405.28
1990/91 136,900 2,327 23.426% 545.12
1991/92 136,900 2,128 23.979% 510.27
1992/93 153,800 2,356 28.162% 663.50
1993/94 153,800 2,356 27.104% 638.57
1994/95 164,600 7.02% 2,572 9.17% 25.188% 647.83 1.45%
Pay 1994 Pay 1995 Change
City Tax Levy - Gross 2,805,925 2,805,925 0.0%
Less Fiscal Disp. Dist. (318,000) (280,610)
Net levy spread 2,487,925 2,525,315 1 .5%
Total City Taxable Tax Capacity 9,182,499 10,025,926 9.2%
City Tax Rate 27.094% 25.188% -7.0%
Assessor's Estimated Market Value $72,000 $77,000 6.9%
Tax Capacity
First $72,000 at 1% 720 720
Balance at 2% 0 100
720 820 13.9%
City Tax Rate 27.094% 25.188%
City Tax $195.08 $206.54 5.9%
• Pay 1994 Pay 1995 Change
City Tax Levy - Gross 2,805,925 2,805,925 0.0%
Less Fiscal Disp. Dist. (318,000) (280,610)
Net levy spread 2,487,925 2,525,315 1 .5%
Total City Taxable Tax Capacity 9,182,499 10,025,926 9.2%
City Tax Rate 27.094% 25.188% -7.0%
Assessor's Estimated Market Value $83,200 $89,000 7.0%
Tax Capacity
First $72,000 at 1% 720 720
Balance at 2% 224 340
944 1 ,060 12.3%
City Tax Rate 27.094% 25.188%
City Tax $255.77 $266.99 4.4%
• Pay 1994 Pay 1995 Change
City Tax Levy - Gross 2,805,925 2,805,925 0.0%
Less Fiscal Disp. Dist. (318,000) (280,610)
Net levy spread 2,487,925 2,525,315 1 .5%
Total City Taxable Tax Capacity 9,182,499 10,025,926 9.2%
City Tax Rate 27.094% 25.188% -7.0%
Assessor's Estimated Market Value $92,200 $98,700 7.0%
Tax Capacity
First $72,000 at 10/0 720 720
Balance at 2% 404 534
1 ,124 1 ,254 11 .6%
City Tax Rate 27.094% 25.188%
City Tax $304.54 $315.86 3.7%
Pay 1994 Pay 1995 Change
City Tax Levy - Gross 2,805,925 2,805,925 0.0%
Less Fiscal Disp. Dist. (318,000) (280,610)
Net levy spread 2,487,925 2,525,315 1 .5%
Total City Taxable Tax Capacity 9,182,499 10,025,926 9.2%
City Tax Rate 27.094% 25.188% -7.0%
Assessor's Estimated Market Value $153,800 $164,600 7.0%
Tax Capacity
First $72,000 at 1% 720 720
Balance at 2% 1 ,636 1 ,852
2,356 2,572 9.2%
City Tax Rate 27.094% 25.188%
City Tax $638.34 $647.83 1 .5%
Commercial Tax EMV Tax Cap. City City
Parcel Year Value Value Tax Rate Tax
27-001162-0 1988/89 46,200 1,525 15.008% 228.87
1989/90 47,400 1,564 16.929% 264.77
1990/91 53,500 1,712 23.426% 401.05
1991/92 52,100 1,615 23.979% 387.26
1992/93 52,100 1,563 28.162% 440.17
1993/94 54,000 1,620 27.104% 439.08
1994/95 59,400 10.00% 1,782 10.00% 25.188% 448.85 2.22%
27-001205-0 1988/89 256,400 11,511 15.008% 1,727.57
1989/90 265,400 11,669 16.929% 1,975.45
1990/91 302,700 13,234 23.426% 3,100.20
1991/92 291,900 12,215 23.979% 2,929.03
1992/93 288,100 11,841 28.162% 3,334.66
1993/94 293,600 11,906 27.104% 3,226.89
1994/95 323,000 10.01% 13,258 11.36% 25.188% 3,339.40 3.49%
27-087008-0 1988/89 270,500 12,251 15.008% 1,838.63
1989/90 281,100 12,464 16.929% 2,110.03
1990/91 295,900 12,897 23.426% 3,021.25
1991/92 284,300 11,854 23.979% 2,842.47
1992/93 332,000 13,904 28.162% 3,915.64
Income 1993/94 342,800 14,168 27.104% 3,840.09
" 1994/95 377,000 9.98% 15,742 11.11% 25.188% 3,965.06 3.25%
27-105001-0 1988/89 1,123,800 57,050 15.008% 8,562.06
1989/90 837,400 40,612 16.929% 6,875.21
1990/91 837,400 39,701 23.426% 9,300.36
1991/92 837,400 38,126 23.979% 9,142.23
1992/93 837,400 37,658 28.162% 10,605.25
1993/94 848,800 37,445 27.104% 10,149.09
1994/95 933,600 9.99% 41,346 10.42% 25.188% 10,414.05 2.61%
27-054001-0 1988/89 5,467,900 285,115 15.008% 42,790.06
1989/90 4,500,000 278,579 16.929% 47,160.64
1990/91 4,501,700 221,084 23.426% 51,791.14
1991/92 4,517,700 212,941 23.979% 51,061.12
1992/93 4,532,400 211,323 28.162% 59,512.78
1993/94 4,575,200 208,859 27.104% 56,609.14
1994/95 4,575,200 0.00% 208,859 0.00% 25.188% 52,607.04 -7.07%
.
in
a)
--4.--
a)
rn
- co
o)
o)
C/ T
w
H I el
el
CO) C I N
W
LUci_ T
i
O i
� i rn
DO..
N-
o)
H J i
I: r:
1
I
wccl
OaT
CO 1
wo
CC
CO
i r-
1 1
i
i
i a)
_co
0
a)
,-
o
o cb c o
oo C)) cohN- (co U) `T7 cv') N O
T t»
•
.
_I -,
,--+
ow
••1. E E £C+l Q
ti:. (L+_+. LU ccO
0 00 u fl.iC
If) C70
I.)..--1 0 Dal W zZ
(yi - I-- -.co +••+w C.Q 0 F'J
E .•CI:
U +� -i u .per t<+= W I-Z
I.) WO �" Z
r 0 w
i-.0 1_c) c•IZ 17¢Z 1.1.1.2 I'_I 0 ccW
('tr-, uiz G.W£ rIE Ch OE 0•+-'Z Z as
( <T 0Q -'CO tiU 0' G•U£ o4
moo--
,-.1(1. --
Ii.. £' (Dm
•+')W �JW ~UW �0__I W aw y
ILI Iii )I- i t:I(L, .,-'(� .r-,
Il0ti) < ,i •••017C0
0 ) ' W Fz z
I>_I T(-•+W p C! �Z �L F- If+C)d F z Z
LY.ti Z F-':.Z CL. N�
1-1-- W 0:3•T ;'J D : U(0< 01- 0 w W
ft IO WH= �� W
PC)'-'C CW]0) a01') 00 C0 WWI-
ECCO Z to' l3
(iIa.E
(tI tC Q ?
(r:(O(tI T ,-+ o V N nt•• ;8: d 1,,-
11.0iLLi) U • �. • F- ti
1-i irk
O e ILI 9, t i Ii i (,.1 ..-+ 1.. Z ID
Z r4 +_-)
03LC) 0. r rn 0 G r� C►J Itr. in
I C? ' c•'�l F
0
Q) t3-in rn • . . - +
C E W
CO r,. w F- N m ID I-O L.
w> '" (°.1 CC Z O
O CO 0 Iii
W UJ001
X > UW !t(t.+(!)
cc
I- 13• z0 OZwocco
I 113 0 to to 01 III' W • 41F
W 0 w w F- N• 0 Cr:CC, If' N t-
O = H WW Obi CO • -.-.,
Q. x x °�
=CC h- 0 t 1 W+ -�.+
• Id CO a) d� IC) r+ ~`J F...
G Q cc(rid p0 '<
W O 00� NLL
OZ � I a.I- •
ON >>- a to V+ to to cA 1 +}�
Icc .se
M M '" }}~ N CO (Ci Tt st If' 11
-J w o) ID {.`1 ,-+In It.'
1 x>call nw.°-'
• j a<.. 0o
~/-t'l a0
W N
wcc
so
00 tN b4F to N+ Hi• +t► +!F Ql
w
x
0 o •.1 m W
iii E
co C7• Eu. •• U uu'i N
J a z EE
(, f` t` Fes- F- Q ti,I,
w Z<
torn CR IU ¢rei k
CO in Uc2Ww ►!
w w 10 4) I- to ¢p cc_ p xx. -� 0 0
i > = F L7 H 0_, II_ t..0- 1.--c;. C7 Qx ON
c -- CO - CO Z ai COW co•- ZZ F-< Cl) 1• ..�
' Y z o r'W CO E CO E U C CO E O C.0 OI
1-, Lr-I- o+ t J IC.+
¢ aD ;1 COW JW CCwN W Z_wY_z 6
4<co C�J£W1IJFW �_wd-•£W >XC�Qw` Uaw c3i Las
` z 00JId t1<IJW cc2UJW Q Q 1--I W ' x
�I � TOCL ZOCL pcoz'-'+0fL F-0�c/» a_� w •L+ -
�o F-r=u I0 ow I0 Q��6a cnp0 -0) i
a c- I•-CC ..:- SG 0 V <o a. ir-1 Z —r 1110(1]
r` C+JCGQ Q1-C�'Q = u�14lQ Uwwc,)F- wU- ¢ ad•'- -
r-i- OOtJI Z•-cPJZ 0 W 01 .M cvcn I ..0 0 1C
tu¢O L'10 yr in 1.30•-1 Il 010(.0 0 0 - 1- d-I